Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
042694 CC Agenda
AGENDA TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL A REGULAR MEETING COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER - 30875 RANCHO VISTA ROAD APRIL 26, 1954- 7:00 PM CLOSED SESSION: 5:30 PM, pursuant to Government Code §54957, Discussion of Public Employee/Independent Contractor - Public Employment/Evaluation of position of City Attorney and § 54956.95- Claimant Dennis Wise & Roseann Perazzo - Agency Claimed against - City of Temecula At approximately 9:45 PM, the City Council will determine which. of the remaining agenda items can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00 PM and may continue all other items on which additional time is required until a future meeting. All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 PM. Next in Order: Ordinance: No. 94-12 Resolution: No. 94-34 CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Ron Roberrs presiding Invocation: Pastor Ken Coil, Neighborhood Church of the Nazarene Flag Salute: Councilmember Birdsall ROLL CALL: Birdsall, Mu~oz, Parks, Stone, Roberts PRESENTATIONS/ PROCLAMATIONS Certificate of Achievement - Bob's Union 76 Station Water Awareness Month PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Council on items that are not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council on an item not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink 'Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk before the Council gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. R:~e~eenda%O428M I CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made at this time. A total, not to exceed, ten (10) minutes will be devoted to these reports. CONSENT CALENDAR NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar am considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll cell vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. Standard Ordinance Adoption Procedure RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. 2 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 Approve the minutes of March 22, 1994; Approve the minutes of March 29, 1994; Approve the minutes of April 7, 1994; Approve the minutes of April 11, 1994; Approve the minutes of April 12, 1994. 3 Resolution Aoorovina List of Demands RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO, 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A R:~a~endatO42eM 2 4 City Treasurer's Statement of Investment Policy RECOMMENDATION: 5 6 7 9 4.1 Adopt the Treasurer's Statement of Investment Policy as proposed by staff which provides safety, liquidity and yield for City funds. Out-of-State Travel Plans RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Authorize certain out-of-state travel plans. Strioing/Stencilino Contract Amendment RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Approve an increase in the contract with Orange County Striping in the amount of $10,000. Professional Services with Norris-Reohe. Inc. for the Design of John Warner Road RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Approve and authorize the Mayor to sign the Professional Services Agreement between the City of Temecula and Norris-Rephe, Inc. to provide Engineering Services for the design of John Warner Road, from Cabrillo Avenue to Santiago Road, for an amount not to exceed $50,051 pending approval of Service Level R funding source by the adjacent homeowners. Professional Services with NBS Lowry for Desian of Santiago Road RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 Approve and authorize the Mayor to sign the Professional Services Agreement between the City of Temecula and NBS/Lowry to provide Engineering Services for the design of Santiago Road, from 300 feet east of Vallejo Avenue to 1100 feet west of Avenida de San Pasqual, for an amount not to exceed $46,400 pending approval of Service Level R funding source by the adjacent homeowners. Aoorooriation of Funds for Pechanga Settlement RECOMMENDATION: 9.1 Approve appropriation of funds in the amount of $17,500 from the Temecula Redevelopment Agency fund balance to Account 280-199-802-5700. R:~4emie~O42eH 10 11 12 13 Financial Advisory Services for Issuance of Industrial Development Bonds RECOMMENDATION: 10.1 Approve the financial advisory services of Fieldman, Rolapp & Associates relating to · the proposed relocation/expansion of Tension Envelope to Temecula and authorize the City Manager and City Clerk to execute a contract. California Parks and Wildlife Bond Act (CALPAW '94) RECOMMENDATION: 11.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ENDORSING THE CALIFORNIA PARKS AND WILDLIFE BOND ACT OF 1994 (CALPAW '94| Sister City Trip, Nakayama Town, JaPan RECOMMENDATION: 12.1 Approve the out-of-state travel of Councilmember J. Sal Muftoz to Japan for City business-related purposes in conjunction with the formal signing of a Sister Cities agreement with Nakayama Town, Japan. "No Parkina" Zone - North Side of Rancho California Road between Lvndie Lane and Moraaa Road RECOMMENDATION: 13.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING A "NO PARKING" ZONE ON THE NORTH SIDE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD BETWEEN LYNDIE LANE AND MORAGA ROAD R:V;eda%O42eM 4 * 14 15 16 17 "No Parking" 7one on Maroarita Road from Rancho Vista Road to Pauba Road from 6:00 AM to 4:00 PM Weekdays RECOMMENDATION: 14.1, Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING A 'NO PARING' ZONE ON MARGARITA ROAD FROM RANCHO VISTA ROAD TO PAUBA ROAD FROM 6:00 A.M. to 4:00 P.M. WEEKDAYS Professional Services with Robert Bein William Frost and Associates for the desion of Walcott Corridor RECOMMENDATION: 15.1 Approve and authorize the Mayor to sign the Professional Services Agreement between the City of Temecula and Robert Bein William Frost and Associates (RBF) to provide Engineering Services for the design of Walcott Corridor, which will include Nicolas Road, Calla Girasol, Calla Chapos and Walcott Lane for an amount not to exceed ~ 118,800 which will be funded through Measure A. Professional Services with Norris-Reoke. Inc. for the Design of Liefar Road RECOMMENDATION: 16.1 Approve and authorize the Mayor to sign the Professional Services Agreement between the City of Temecula and Norris-Repke, Inc. to provide Engineering Services for the design of Liefar Road, north of Nicolas Road for an amount not to exceed $59,098 pending approval of Service Level R funding source by the adjacent homeowners. Temecula Senior Center PW 92-07 - Acceotance of a Grant of Easement - Sixth Street RECOMMENDATION: 17.1 Authorize the Mayor to execute the Agreement and Grant of Easement with the State of California, Department of Forestry and Fire Protection accepting an easement for public roadway purposes; R:~e~.~de~D42894 6 18 19 20 21 17.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE GRANT OF EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC ROADWAY PURPOSES AND ACCEPTING INTO THE CITY-MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM, A PORTION OF THE CUL-DE-SAC AT THE NORTHEASTERLY END OF SIXTH STREET Contract Amendment No. 7 to Community Facilities District 88-12 Engineering Services Contract with J.F. Davidson Associates, Inc, for the Overland Drive Overcrossino Improvement Project RECOMMENDATION: 18.1 Approve Contract Amendment No. 7 to provide additional engineering services for CFD 88-12 by J.F. Davidson Associates, Inc. (JFD) for the Overland Drive Overcrossing Improvement Project in the amount of $106,888. Conversion of City Vehicle to Alternative Fuel Source RECOMMENDATION: 19.1 Approve conversion of one vehicle to propane; 19.2 Appropriate $2,100 for the cost of conversion in the new AB 2766 Fund (account number 150-199-999-5250). Acceot Public Imorovements and Substitute Bond~ and AQreements in Tract No. 22715-F RECOMMENDATION: 20.1 Accept the Public Improvements in Tract No. 227i 5-F; 20.2 Authorize the reduction in Faithful Performance, Street, Water and Sewer Bond amounts; 20.3 Accept the substitute Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Bond riders; 20.4 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors. Accept Public Improvements and Substitute Bonds and Ac~reements in Tract No. 22715-2 RECOMMENDATION: 21.1 Accept the Public Improvements in Tract No. 22715-2; R:~a~ende~042014 8 21.2 Authorize the reduction in Faithful Performance, Street, Water and Sewer Bond amounts, Accept the substitute Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Bond riders; 21.3 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors. 22 Acceot Public Imorovements and Substitute Bonds end Aoreements in Tract No. 22716-3 RECOMMENDATION: 22.1 Accept the Public Improvements in Tract No. 22716-3; 22.2 Authorize the reduction in Faithful Performance, Street, Water and Sewer Bond amounts; 22.3 AccePt the substitute Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Bond riders; 22.4 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors. 23 Acceot Public Imorovements in Tract No. 21674-3 .RECOMMENDATION: 23.1 Accept the Public Improvements in Tract No. 21674-3; 23.2 Authorize the reduction of Faithful Performance, Street, Sewer and Water Improvement Securities; 23.3 Approve the subdivision agreement rider; 23.4 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Surety and Developer. PUBLIC HEARINGS Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing. 24 ProPosed Ordinance Renardina Charitable. ReliQious and Commercial Solicitation RECOMMENDATION: 24.1 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: 25 - ORDINANCE NO. 94, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA REPEALING PORTIONS OF ORDINANCE NO. 90-04 PERTAINING TO COMMERCIAL. AND CHARITABLE SOLICITATIONS AND ADDING CHAPTER 5.16 TO THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS FOR CHARITABLE, RELIGIOUS AND COMMERCIAL SOLICITATIONS 24.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING A NON-REFUNDABLE PERMIT APPLICATION FEE FOR CHARITABLE, RELIGIOUS, AND COMMERCIAL SOLICITATION WITHIN THE CITY OF TEMECULA Ordinance to Reduce Water Consumotion ThrouQh Efficient Landscaoe Desion Consistent with Provisions of AB 325 · RECOMMENDATION: 25.1 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: 25.2 ORDINANCE NO. 94- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING STANDARDS FOR WATER EFFICIENT LANDSCAPE DESIGN Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94° A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING A LIST OF PLANT MATERIALS WATER EFFICIENT LANDSCAPE DESIGN COUNCIL BUSINESS 26 ADoointments to Old Town Local Review Board RECOMMENDATION: 26.1 Review applications received and select five members and one alternate to serve as the Old Town Local Review Board. R:~t4ende%042684 8 27 28 29 30 31 32 Broadcast Soonsorshio of Council Meetings RECOMMENDATION: 27.1 Approve the attached guidelines for broadcast sponsorship of City Council meetings, or other City initiated programming... Procedures and Recommendations for Notice of Public Hearing (Continued from the meeting of 4/5/94) RECOMMENDATION: 28.1 Provide Direction to Staff regarding the Implementation of Notice of Public Hearing Procedures. Private Bus Benches in Public Riaht of Way (Continued from the meeting of 4/5/94) 29.1 Provide direction to Staff regarding the placing of benches in the public right-of- way. Status Reoort on Winchester Interchanae. Overland Bridae. Winchester/Nicolas Sionalization. Rioht Turn Lane at Pala Road/Highway 79 South. MarQarita Road Widenincl North of Rancho California Road (Continued from the meeting of 4/5/94) 30.1 Receive and file the status report on Winchester Interchange, Overland Bridge, Winchester/Nicolas Signalization, Right-turn lane at Pala Road/Highway 79 South, and Margarita Road north of Rancho California Road. Status of Prooosed Downsizin¢~ Ordinance RECOMMENDATION: 31.1 Receive and file status report on the preparation of the proposed' downsizing ordinance. Owl Rock Products. Wilson Creek Mine. Owl Rock Sand and Gravel Surface Mining Ooeration in the Aauanga Area RECOMMENDATION: ., 32.1 Receive and file report. DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT CITY MANAGER'S REPORT ADJOURNMENT Next meeting: May 4, 1994, 8:30 AM, Joint Workshop between City of Temecula/City of Murrieta/Temecula-Murrieta EDC. Next regular meeting: May 10, 1994, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. R:~,a, gende~042884 10 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SFRVI~;S DISTRICT MEFTING - (To be held ~ 8:00) eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee CALL TO ORDER: President Jeffrey E. Stone ROLL CALL: DIRECTORS: Birdsall, Mur~oz, Parks, Roberrs, Stone PUBLIC COMMENT: Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors, should present a completed pink 'Request to Speak' to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state Your name and address for the record. CONSENT CALENDAR I Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of March 22, 1994. 2 Contract for July 4th, 1994 Fireworks Show RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Award a contract to Robert Caran Productions to produce the City of Temecula's 1994 July 4th Fireworks Show. 3 Solicitation of Construction Bids for Kent Hindergardt Memorial Park (PW94-01CSD) and Loma Linda Park - Phase II (PW94-O2CSD)- RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Approve the construction plans and specifications and authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit public construction bids for Kent Hintergardt Memorial Park (PW94-01CSD) and Loma Linda Park- Phase II (PW94-02CSD). 4 Amendment to the Desiqn Contract for Pala Community Park - Project No. PW93-03CSD RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Approve Amendment No. 4 to the design contract with Wimmer-Yamada Associates (WYA) to provide additional engineering and architectural services for Pala Community Park, Project No. PW93-03CSD, in an amount not to exceed $9,700.00. ~ ~ R:~e~ende%0428~4 11 5 Professional Services Contract - Soorts Park Slooe Repair - Project No. PW93-06CSD RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Authorize an advance of $9,868.00 from the General Fund to the CIP Fund. 5.2 Appropriate $9,868.00 from the CIP Fund to Account No. 210-166-648-5804. 6 Award of Construction Contract for LonQ Valley Wash - Channel Repair - PW94-06CSD RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Award a contract for the Long Valley Wash - Channel Repair, PW94-06CSD, to Monteleone Excavating, Inc. for $53,000.00 and authorize the President to execute the contract; 6.2 Authorize the General Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $5,300.00, which is equal to 10% of the contract amount. 6.3 Appropriate $12,168 from the General Fund to Account No. 001-166-999-5401to provide the additional funds necessary to construct the project. PUBLIC HEARINGS Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing. Rancho California Soorts Park Improvement Project RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Approve the master plan for the Rancho California Sports Park Improvement project. 7.2 Adopt Negative Declaration for the project. 7.3 Authorize the preparation of construction documents and release a formal public bid for the project. R:~eenda~O42eB4 12 DISTRICT BUSINESS Temecula Town Association Lease of the Northwest SPOrtS Comolex RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 Approve lease agreement between the City of Temecula and the Temecula Town Association for the usa of the Northwest Sports Complex. Discussion of Master Plan for Park View Site (Placed on the agenda at the request of Mayor Pro Tem Stone and Councilmember Mur~oz) DEPARTMENTAL REPORT GENERAL MANAGERS REPORT - Bradley DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT - Nelson BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS ADJOURNMENT: Next meeting May 10, 1994, 8:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. "~ R:~e~ende%0428~4. 13 CALL TO ORDER: ROLL CALL: PUBLIC COMMENT: TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AnENCY Mt=ETINn Chairperson Ronald J. Parks presiding AGENCY MEMBERS: Birdsall, Mufioz, Roberrs, Stone, Parks Anyone wishing to address the Agency, should present a completed pink "Request to Speak" to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address for the record. Next in Order: Resolution No. RDA 94-04 CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of March 22, 1994. 2 RDA Commercial Small Business Loan RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve an RDA small business loan to A & K Communications. AGENCY BUSINESS 3 Authorization of Anreements for Consultinn Services for Old Town T.Z.B.G.. Inc. Redevelooment Project RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Authorize the Chairperson to execute an agreement with Tom Dodson and Associates not to exceed $78,500 subject to the approval of the Executive Director and the General Counsel as to the final form of the agreement. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT AGENCY MEMBER'S REPORTS ADJOURNMENT: Next Meeting: Temecula, California. R:%Aeende~O42eI94 May 10, 1994, 8:00 PM, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, 14 PRESENTATIONS/ PROCLAMATIONS City of Temecula Special Achievement Award The City Council of the City of Temecula, commends the outstanding achievement of Bob Grim and joins with the citizens of the City of Temecula in expressing sincere gratitude to him for taking the initiative to create and complete the landscaping and beauti~cation of Bob's Unocal at the intersection of Rancho California Road and Front Street. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto affixed my hand and official seal this 26th day of April, 1994 Ron Roberts, Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk The City of Temecula PROCLAMATION WHEREAS, Water Awareness Month is designated to raise the pubic's understanding of water distribution, quality and conservation; and to instffi the importance of wise water use; and WRrERE~, it iS incumbent on all citizens to be aware of water issues so that they may make informed decisions regarding the management of our precious water resources; and WHEREAS, the state of California continues to be in a water deficit condition, mating public education on conservation practices and the role each citizen plays in the availability, quality and future supply of water increasingly important; and WHEREAS, Rancho California Water District and Eastern Municipal Water District who serve the greater Temecula area consistently work with the Association of California Water Agencies, the California State Department of Water Resources, the California Water Awareness Committee and other water agencies to increase water awareness; NOW, THEREFORE, I, Ron Roberts, on behalf of the City Council of the City of Temecula, hereby proclaim the month of May, to be "WATER AWARENESS MONTH" IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City of Temecula to be affixed this 261h day of April, 1994. Ron Roberts, Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk ITEM 1 ITEM NO. 2 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL HELD MARCH 22, 1994 A regular meeting of the Temecula City Council was called to order at 5:34 PM at the Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Tamecula, California. Mayor Ron Robarts presiding. PRESENT 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Mu~ioz, Parks, Stone, Roberrs ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None Also present were City Manager Ronald E. Bradley, City Attorney Scott F. Field, and City Clerk June S. Greek. EXECUTIVE SESSION A meeting of the City of Temecula City Council was called to order at 5:36 PM. It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Birdsall to adjourn to Executive Session pursuant to Government Code § 54956.8 concerning property located at 41915 Business Park Drive. The negotiating parties are the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula and International Rectifier. Under negotiation: Terms and conditions of an Owner-Participation Agreement by which the agency will induce International Rectifier to expand its facilities on the property. EXECUTIVE SESSION: 6:00 PM, Closed Session of the City Council pursuant to Government Code §54956.9(a)Conference with Legal Counsel- existing litigation, Modaffare vs. the City of Temecula and R & D Corporation vs. Xerox Corporation (Class' Action). The meeting was reconvened in regular session at 7:06 PM. INVOCATION The invocation was given by Pastor Tim Buttery, Temecula Valley Christian Center. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The audience was led in the flag salute by Mayor Pro Tam Stone. PRESENTATIONS/ PROCLAMATIONS Jane Farmer, Riverside County Office of Aging, gave a presentation on the "Friends of the Family" program, which matches seniors with families of disabled children. She encouraged all interested parties to contact the Office of Aging at 1-800-400-4664. Minutee~3~22~94 -1 - O4114/94 CiW Council Minutea March 22, 1994 PUBLIC COMMENTS Morton Bender, 31684 Paseo Goleta, spoke in opposition to the proposed downsizing of models near Rancho Vista Estates, due to the economic impact it could have on surrounding property values. Susan Harris, 31672 Paseo Goleta, expressed her opposition to the proposed downsizing adjacent to Rancho Vista Estates, and further stated Mesa Homes did not inform property owners of plans. She requested the City Council adopt an ordinance limiting downsizing. Robert J. Danko, 31572 Paseo Goleta, requested an ordinance be adopted preventing downsizing and expressed opposition to the proposed downsizing near Rancho Vista Estates. Carmine A. Latrecchia, 31533 Corte Pacheco, asked that the Council not be governed by protests and stated the sizes of proposed homes in this area are comparable to he first phase of Rancho Vista Estates. Bill Butler, 27555 Ynez Road, Ste 200, President of Mesa Homes, gave an update to the Council and Community. He stated that he has met individually with Mayor Pro Tam Stone, Councilmember Mur~oz and Councilmember Parks regarding the concerns of the surrounding homeowners and announced a meeting to be held Thursday, March 24, 1994, to work toward resolution of the problem. Paul Serau, 31675 Leigh Lane, addressed the growing crime rate in Temecula, primarily in regard to gangs and asked what measures are being taken to eliminate gangs. Chief Sayre, Temecula Police Department, addressed the concerns of Mr. Serau, explaining that the Police Department has taken an aggressive approach to crime, however the ultimate answer lies in the community, with development of youth programs, facilities, churches and ultimately the family unit. Jerry B. Geller, 42450 Wilson Valley Rd, Aguanga, asked that the City Council of the City of Temecula, lend their support against the Owl Rock Sand mining project and its use of Hwy 79. Mayor Robarts asked that this be added to the agenda of April 5, 1994. Councilmember Mu~oz suggested a procedure be developed, whereby homeowners would receive notification if any changes are being planned for their particular area, with the City Council having the authority to intervene if necessary. Councilmember Parks stated he would like to see a cooperative effort between the community and the developer to work out these problems. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Mayor Pro Tam Stone stated he met with members of Kemper Development and homeowners .to work toward solving the downsizing problem. He also stated he and Councilmember Birdsall attended the Community Services Conference in Washington, D.C. and gained valuable Mioutea%3%22%94 -2- 04/14/94 Council Minute March 22, i 994 information regarding telecommunication. He reported the National League of Cities is concerned that there is no local control over telephone companies. He thanked staff for looking into, and responding to the traffic problem on the Winchester Bridge. Councilmember Birdsall reported she also artended the conference in Washington, D.C. and a new federal bill has passed which provides grant money for volunteer work. She stated she and Finance Officer Mary Jane McLamey would attend a conference in San Diego to obtain further information, and will report back to the Council. Councilmember MuAoz asked that the matter of traffic problems on Highway 79 and Pala Rd, LaPaz and Highway 79 and the Winchester Overpass be placed on the next agenda for discussion. He also reported that there is a bill proposed, AB 3167, that would preempt local control of graffiti and suggested taking an official position. Mayor Roberts reported he attend the League of California Cities Public Safety Committee, which supports a "no" vote on AB 3167, the graffiti bill. He also complimented staff on the excellent City Manager recruitment brochure that was put together. RECESS Mayor Roberts called a brief recess at 8:05 PM to change the tape. The meeting was reconvened at 8:07 PM. CONSENT CALr:NDAR Mayor Pro Tem Stone requested the minutes of March 8, 1994 be corrected on Item 2.2 to reflect his absence, and asked that Item No. 4 be removed from the Consent Calendar. Councilmember Mur~oz requested that Items 6 and 10 be removed. Mayor Roberts announced he would pull Item No. 11 from the Consent Calendar. It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Stone, seconded by Councilmember Parks to approve Consent Calendar Items 1, 2 as corrected, 3, 5, 8 and 9. The motion was unanimously carried. 1. Standard Ordinance Adoorion Procedure 1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances end resolution included in the agenda. 2. Minutes 2.1 Approve the minutes of February 22, 1994; 2.2 Approve the minutes of March 8, 1994. Minutee~3%22%94 -3- 04114/94 Citv Council Minutes 3. e 12. Resolution AoDrovina List of Demands 3.1 Meroh 22. 1994 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94-28 A RESOLUTION OF, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A "Stoo" Sion on Enfield lane at Riverton Lane 5.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94-29 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING A "STOP" SIGN ON ENFIELD LANE AT RIVERTON LANE Performina Arts Theater Status Report 8.1 Receive and file status report on performing arts theater concept for the City of Temecula. Solicitation of Construction Bids for Ynez Road Landscape Imorovements Project (PW94-04) 9.1 Approve the construction plans and specifications and authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit public construction bids for Project No. PW94-04, Ynez Road Landscape Improvements. Sister Cities Trio - Nakavama Town, Japan 12.1 Authorize the expenditure of up to $500 by Mayor Roberts for City business related expenditures in conjunction with the formal signing of a Sister Cities agreement with Nakayama town, Japan, to be conducted in Japan. Fire Svstems Insoector Position Mayor Pro Tern Stone asked for justification regarding the proposed position. Finance Officer Mary Jane McLarney explained that when the County of Riverside closed their Temecula office, response times for fire inspections became inadequate and a person on staff was needed to expedite this procedure. Minutes%3%22%94 -4- 04114/94 Ciw Council Minutes March 22. 1994 It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Stone to approve staff recommendation as follows: 4.1 Approve an amendment to the Fire Services contract with the County of Riverside for the addition of a Fire Systems Inspector Position and authorize fie City Manager/Mayor to execute the amendment. The motion was unanimously carried. 6. Calls Pins Colads Speed Undulations - FOllow-Up Reoort Councilmember Mu~oz asked that staff present a brief report for the benefit of the public. Director of Public Works Tim Serlet presented the staff report. Betty Pettit, 30642 Calle Pins Colads, addressed the City Council stating the speed · undulations have not solved the problem, but only made the street noisier.due to the slower speed of trucks going over the undulations. Heather Johnson, 30702 Calls Pins Colads, stated the speed undulations have not solved the traffic problems on Calls Pins Colads. Sam Cuckovich, 30767 Calls Pins Colads, stated he feels either the undulations need to be raised, or the street closed. Richard Green, 30707 Calls Pins Colada, asked that the City close Calls Pins Colads and stated the speed undulations have not been effective. Jayme Christian, 30762 Calls Pins Colads, spoke in favor of closing Calls Pina Colada. Councilmember Mufioz asked staff for a recommendation. Director of Public Works Ssrlet stated this is only a status report, however, if Council wishes, the speed undulations could be raised to 3". Mayor Pro Tem Stone asked that the Police Department do additional patrols on this street and suggested the height of the speed undulations be increased. City Attorney Field suggested that a recommended action be placed on the agenda of April 5, 1994 for action. It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Stone to place this matter on the agenda of April 5, 1994. The motion was unanimously carried. Minutee~3%22~94 -5- 04114/94 CiW Council Minutes- March 22, 1994 Amendment No. 1 to the Reimbursement Aoreement between the City of Temecula and the Rancho California Water District. for Water Main Imorovements Associated with the Liefar Road Bridge Project (PW93-0~) Mayor Pro Tam Stone asked for an explanation regarding the reimbursement percentages. Director of Public Works Tim Serlet, responded that Change Order No. 2 was split 50/50 with The Rancho California Water District to prevent any hold up of the bridge construction, however the City will be submitting application to FEMA for reimbursement. It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Stone, seconded by Councilmember Parks to approve staff recommendation as follows: 7.1 Approve and authorize the Mayor to sign Amendment NO. I to the Reimbursement Agreement with Rancho California Water District (RCWD) for 100% reimbursement of Contract Change Order No. 1, and 50% reimbursement of Contract Change Order No. 2, for improvements associated with the Liefar Road Bridge Project (PW93-02). The motion was unanimously carried. 10. Winchester Road Interchanoe Improvements- Caltrans Coooerative Desjan Agreement Councilmember Mur~oz questioned the length of time for plans and specs preparation. Director of Public Works Serlet answered that the procedure used has been on a faster track than the typical procedure and stated that the City is on schedule to advertise this project in December of this year. It was moved by Mayor Pro Tam. Stone, seconded by Councilmember parks to approve staff recommendation as follows: 10. 1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94-30 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT NO. 8-791, BETWEEN THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR DESIGN OF THE WINCHESTER ROAD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS' The motion was unanimously carried. Minutee~3~22%94 -6- O411 4/94 Ciw Council Minutes- Meroh 22. 1994 .11. ContractAmendment No. 6 to Community Facilities District 88-19 Enoineering Services Contract with J.R. Davidso(~ Associates. Inc. Mayor Pro Tam asked for an explanation of this item. Director of Public Works Tim Serlet explained that Caltrans increased the radius of the project, making this amendment necessary. It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Stone, seconded by Councilmember Parks to approve staff recommendation as follows: 11.1 Approve Contract Amendment No. 6 to provide additional right-of-way engineering services for CFD 88-12 by J.F. Davidson Associates, Inc. (JFD) for the Winchester Road Interchange Improvement Project in the amount of $15,500.00. The motion was unanimously carried. RECESS Mayor Robarts called a recess at 9:00 PM. The meeting was reconvened following. the previously scheduled Community Services District Meeting and the Redevelopment Agency Meeting at 9:25 PM. Mayor Roberrs reordered the agenda to take Item No. 19 out of order. 19. Review and Aooroval of the 20th Year FY 94-95 Communitv Develooment Block Grant ADolications Finance Officer Mary Jane McLarney introduced Financial Services Administrator Luci Romero, who presented the staff report. John Dedovesh, 39450 Long Ridge Drive, spoke in favor of funding St. Catherine Catholic Church, which provides emergency food, utility assistance and financial aide for the needy. Ben Novell, 29379 Rancho California Road, Ste 205, spoke in favor of support for Alternatives to Domestic Violence. Barbara Card, President of the Assistance League of Temecula Valley, spoke in favor of funding of the project known as "Operation School Bell", which provides clothing and school supplies for needy school age children. Alice Lacasse, spoke in favor of funding for St. Catherine's food bank project, stating the organization fed 8,000 people last year. Minutes%3%22%94 -7- 04114/94 CiW Council Minutes March 22, 1994 Councilmember Parks stated that in addition to CDBG funding, the City Council has discretionary funds from which projects of this nature are considered for funding. Finance Officer Mary Jane McLarney stated applications not recommended for funding from CDBG funds, could be rolled over for consideration of City Council Discretionary Funds. It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, 'seconded by Councilmember Parks to approve Alternate I as follows: Public Service Grants: Alternatives to Domestic Violence- $10,000, Assistance League of Temacula Valley- $2,500 to $7,250, Sr. Citizen Service Center of Temecula Rancho Area, Inc. - $10,000. It was further moved to award $125,000for the dasilting basin and the remaining funds for handicap access ramps. In the event a minimum of $10,000 is not available for the funding of the ramps, all of the remaining funds are to be awarded to the desilting basin project. It was further directed that the two requests that were not recommended for CDBG funding be included in the requests for City Council Discretionary Funds. The motion was unanimously carried. It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Mayor Pro Tam Stone to extend the meeting until 10:30 PM. The motion was unanimously carried. PUBLIC HEARINGS 15. Tension Envelooe Corooration Finance Officer Mary Jane McLarney presented the staff report. Mayor Robarts opened the public hearing at 9:55 PM. Hearing no requests to speak, Mayor Robarts closed the public hearing at 9:56 PM. It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Mayor Pro Tam Stone to approve staff recommendation as follows: 15.1 Read by title only and adopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 94-09 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THE NEED FOR AN INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, AND DECLARING THAT SUCH AUTHORITY SHALL FUNCTION WITHIN THE CITY Minutee~,3~.22\94 -8- 04114/94 City Council Minutes 15,2 15.3 Maroh 22. 1994 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94-31 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACKNOWLEDGING THE RECEIPT OF AN APPLICATION FOR INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT BOND FINANCING ON BEHALF OF THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA REGARDING THE TENSION ENVELOPE CORPORATION PROJECT AND APPROVING THE ISSUANCE OF BONDS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH Adopt e resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94-32 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DECLARING ITSELF TO BE THE BOARD-OF DIRECTORS OF THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA The motion was unanimously carried. COUNCIL BUSINESS 16. Consolidation of City Council Elections in November of Odd-numbered Years City Clerk June Greek presented the staff report. It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Stone to approve staff recommendation as follows: 16.1 Introduce an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 94-10 AN ORDINANCE .OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY. OF TEMECULA REQUIRING THAT THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTIONS OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA BE HELD ON THE FIRST TUESDAY AFTER THE FIRST MONDAY OF NOVEMBER IN EACH ODD-NUMBERED YEAR The motion wes carried by the following vote: AYES: 4 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 ABSTAIN: I COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsell, Parks, Stone, Roberts None None Muftoz Minutee%3%22~94 -9- 04114/94 ~, City Council Minutes March 22. 1994 RECESS Mayor Roberts called a recess at 10:06 PM to change the tape. The meeting was reconvened at 10:07 PM. 17. Selection of City Council Committee Assionments City Attorney Scott Field presented the staff report. It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Stone, seconded by Councilmember Parks to approve the City Council Committee Assignments as follows: 17.1 Appoint a member of the City Council to represent the City on the following: Riverside County Conservation Habitat Agency- Parks/Mu~oz (alternate) Riverside Transit Agency - Mufioz Riverside County Transportation Commission - Mufioz WRCOG (Western Riverside Council of Governments) - Roberrs/Parks (alternate) French Valley Airport Committee - Stone The Temecula Sister City Corporation Board of Directors - Roberrs Temecula/Murrieta Joint Transportation/Traffic Committee - Roberts 17.2 Appoint two members to each of the following Advisory Committees and approve the jurisdiction of the committee as contained in the staff report: Approved the recommended jurisdictions and added the following jurisdiction for the Economic Development committee: "To work with the City Manager and staff to promote business retention and new development". · · · · · Community Services Funding Review Committee - Stone/Birdsall Finance Committee -' Mur~bz/Birdsall Old Town Steering Committee - Parks/Birdsall Public Works/Facilities Committee - Roberts/Parks Economic Development Committee - Stone/Roberts 17.3 Appoint a member of the City Council to serve as liaison to each of the City · Commissions, to the Pechanga Tribal Council. Community Services Commission - Stone Planning Commission- Parks Traffic/Public Safety Commission - Roberts Pechanga Tribal Council - Muf~oz Minutes%3%22~94 - 1 O- 04114/94 City Counoil Minutes March 22, 1994 21. Allocation of Funds for Continued Conceot Study of Old Town Temecula Entertainment. Center "City Manager Ron .Bradley presented the staff report. The report was received and filed. 22. · Status Report on Winchester Interchanae. Overland Bridoe, Winchester/Nicolas Sianalization. and Rioht Turn Lane at Pale Road/Highway 79 South It was moved by Councilmember MuSoz, seconded by Councilmember Parks to continue this item to the meeting of April 5, 1994 and direct staff to add the status of the widening of Margarita Road north of Rencho California Road. The motion was unanimously carried. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT None. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT City Attorney Field announced that during the closed session the following items were added: Government Code §54956.9(a)concerning property on Diaz Road owned by Quicksilver Corporation, concerning terms and conditions of Owner Participation Agreement; and Government Code Section 54956.9(a) regarding Indian Child Welfare vs. City of Temecula. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Mayor Pro Tam Stone, seconded .by Councilmember Mu~toz to adjourn at 10:43 PM to a Joint City of Temecula/City of Murrieta City Council Meeting on March 29, 1994, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. The motion was unanimously carried. Ron Roberrs, Mayor ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk Minutes~3\22%94 -12- O4114/94 Citv Council Minutes Merch 22, 1994 20. 17.4 Retire the following standing committees: · · · · · RDA Committee Administration Committee Land Use Committee Integrated Waste Management Committee Cultural Preservation Committee The motion was unanimously carried. Ordinance Changino Place of City Council Meetinas It was moved by Councilmember Mur~oz, seconded by approve staff recommendation as follows: 18.1 Councilmember Parks to Read by title only end introduce an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 94-11 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING SECTION 2.04.010 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING THE TIME AND PLACE OF THE CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Mur~oz, Parks, Stone, Roberrs NOES: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None Consideration of Soace Availability'and Land Use Needs Assessment City Manager Ron Bradley presented the staff report. It was moved by Councilmember Muf~oz, seconded by Councilmember Birdsall to approve staff recommendation as follows: 20.1 Direct staff to conduct a space utilization analysis, develop a strategic plan for municipal office space and public works yard, review available sites and make appropriate recommendations. Staff is to report back within 90 days. 20.2 Approve an allocation of $20,000for professional services to Account No. 210- 649-5700, and authorize an operating transfer from the development impact fund reserves to the capital projects fund for $20,000. The motion was unanimously carried. ~ Minutes%3\22~,94 - 11 - 04/14/94 MINUTES OF A SPECIAL JOINT MEETING OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA WITH THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MURRIETA 'COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER - 30875 RANCHO VISTA ROAD HELD MARCH 29, 1994 A regular meeting of the Temecula City Council was called to order at 7:11 PM at the Temecula Community Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. Mayor Ron Roberts presiding. PRESENT 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Mufioz, Stone, Roberts ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None Perks, PRESENT: 3 ABSENT: 2 COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: Geisse, Walsh, VanHaaster Allen, Smith Also present were City Manager David F. Dixon, City Manager Jack Smith, City Attorney Scott F. Field, City Clerk June S. Greek and City Clerk Kay Vincent. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The audience was led in the flag salute by Mayor Jack VanHaaster, City of Murrieta. PUBLIC COMMENTS None given. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS None given. COUNCIL BUSINESS 1. Presentation on Murrieta-Temecula Labor Force Study David Wilcox, Economics Research Associates, presented a summary of the Labor Market Analysis for the Temecula-Murrieta Region. James Gibb, 26500 Scaramelia Circle, Hemet, Murrieta Chamber of Commerce/Business Development Committee, requested that they receive a copy of the study. Minutee%3~.93%94 - 1 - 04114/94 City Council Minutes March 29, 1994 2. Watershed Planning Director of Planning Gary Thornhill introduced John Meyer, City of Temecula Senior Planner and Fred Buss, Murrieta Advanced Planner, who presented the staff report. John Bell, 37527 Vineyard Knoll, Murrieta, asked that the MOU not be entered into at this time, since input from all parties has not' been received. Russell Rumansoff, 27349 Jefferson Avenue, Temecula, stated he feels it is important that the cities be involved in this plan, since with or without city participation, the plan will go forward. He requested that a representative from the land owners as well as the business community be a part of the policy committee. David L. Bartlett, 24197 Via Prima Vera, Murrieta, spoke in opposition to the MOU and stated a study has not been completed to see if the land owners are in favor of such a plan. RECESS Mayor Roberts called a recess at 8:45 PM. The meeting was reconvened at 9:04 PM. Alison Edwards, 29377 Rancho California Road, Temecula, representing Assemblyman Haynes read a letter asking that approval of the MOU be post-poned. The letter also expressed concern that land owners and business owners were not included in the policy committee and asked that he be given a seat on the policy committee. Councilmember Birdsall stated she supports appointing a member of the land owners group and the business community to the policy committee to receive needed input. Sharon Bolton, 35126 Tack Road; Temecula, President of the California Land Institute, suggested that two advisory boards be created, one business and one landowners. Each group would then choose a representative who 'would sit on the policy committee. She stated by so doing, interested parties would be kept better informed. Larry Markham, 41750Winchester Road, Ste N., Temecula, stated he feels that buy-in from the land owners, early in the process, would be beneficial. It was moved by Councilmember Muf~oz, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Stone to enter into the Memorandum of Understanding for development of a Santa Margarita River Watershed Management Program, that two committees be formed, one of business owners and one of land owners to make recommendations to the policy committee. Mayor Van Haaster stated he would prefer to wait until his entire City Council is present to make a decision. Minutes%3%93%94 -2- 04114/94 City Council Minute8 March 29, 1994 Councilmember Perks Stated he would support this motion if local Assembly and State' Senate representative, are extended an invitation to .sit on the policy committee. Councilmember Muf~oz amended his motion to recommend to the policy committee that they extend invitations to the local assemblyman and State representative. Mayor Pro Tam' Stone stated he would support the amendment with the understanding that Assemblyman Haynes would personally be the voting member on the .policy committee, not a proxy. The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: I COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: CITY MANAGER'S REPORT None given. CITY ATTORNEY REPORTS None given. ADJOURNMENT Mufioz, Parks, Stone, Robarts Birdsall None .. It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Stone to adjourn at 9:38 PM to a meeting on April 5, 1994, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rencho Vista Road, Temecula, California. The motion was unanimously carried. ADJOURNMENT ATTEST: Ron Roberrs, Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk Minutea~,3~93%94 -3- 04/14/94 MINUTES OF A SPECIAL MEETING HELD JOINTLY WITH THE CITY OF TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING COMMISSION THURSDAY, APRIL 7, 1994 A special meeting held jointly with the Temecula City Council and Planning Commission was called to order Thursday, April 7, 1994, 7:00 P.M., at the Temecula Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California, Mayor Ron Roberrs presiding. Councilmember Munoz led the flag salute. PRESENT: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Munoz, Parks, Stone; Roberrs ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None PRESENT: 3 COMMISSIONERS: Hoagland, Salyer, Ford ABSENT: 2 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Fahey Also present were City Manager Ron Bradley, City Attorney, City Clerk June S. Greek and Recording Secretary Gail Zigler. PUBLIC COMMENT None CITY COUNCIL REPORTS None COUNCIL BUSINESS 1. French Valley AirPort Master Plan Planning Director Gary Thornhill presented the staff report. Rod Murphy, Aviation Director for Riverside County, discussed the design process for the plan. Mr. Murphy said the plan before the Council and Commission is the County staff's plan, which they have chosen to present to the County Board of Supervisors. Jim Harris of Kaufman and Associates, the consultant hired to prepare the plan, provided an overview of the master plan. Mr. Harris said currently 107 aircraft are located at Frency Valley Airport and by the year 2013, this number will increase to approximately 200. Take-offs and landings are now at 58,000 and would increase ~ I/""' CC/PCMINO4/07/94 1 04/13/94 JOINT CITY COUNCIL/PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES APRIL 7. 1994 to 128,000. The increases in operations are based on an increase in the number of business end corporate aircraft using the airport. Mr. Harris said the study shows that a 6,000' runaway would best handle the demand and the preferrable instrument approach would be to the north. Mr. Harris said .the plan is a 20 year plan totaling just over $20,000,000. Councilmember Munoz questioned why the addition to the length of the runaway is proposed to the south and not the northern portion of the airport. Jim Harris explained that extending the runway to the north would have been very costly. He said the standards were applied to both conditions and found no negative conditions in extending the runway to the south. Councilmember Munoz expressed concern that no negative impacts were found in extending the runway south into an established city rather than to the north into a commercial area. e Pechanoa Indian Reservation Casino Prooosal Planning Director Gary Thornhill advised the Council and Commission that staff tried to have a representative from the indian tribe present to discuss the project, however, they decided that it is not appropriate at this time. Assistant Planner Matthew Fagan presented the staff report and provided an overview of the proposed project as follows: Phase 1 Casino (60,000 square feet) includes: Restaurant Child Care Facility Health Club Bingo and Card Games Off-Track Betting Mr. Fagan said there is a potential for an increase to 112,000 square feet if machine games are approved. The proposed amphitheater has been deleted from the project. Retail shopping center (50,000 square feet) 9 Hole Golf Course and 6,000 square foot clubhouse Recreational Vehicle Park Conference Center (10,000 square feet) Phase 2 Hotel (250 rooms) CC/PCMIN04107194 2 0411 3/94 JOINT CITY COUNCIL/PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - APRIL 7. 1994 Tom Montaldo, 46037 Clubhouse Drive, Temecula, expressed concern the proposed project will have a negative fiscal impact on the City of Temecula.. Carol Powell, 45884 Hopactong, Temecula, said she is opposed to the location of the proposed casino. She expressed her concern for potential increased crime, air pollution, traffic, property values, etc. Amy DiGiaiomo, 31319 Arebasca Circle, Temecula, said she is opposed to the proposed casino. Mayor Pro Tem Stone stated his opposition to gambling in the City of Temecula, and said he feels the indian tribe should be responsible for mitigating the negative impacts created by the project. It was moved by Commissioner Hoegland, seconded by Commissioner Salyer to adjourn The Planning Commission meeting at 9:00 P.M. The motion carried as follows: AYES: 3 COMMISSIONERS: Hoagland, Salyer, Ford NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: 2 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Fahey Councilmember Munoz said he would like to discuss the French Valley Airport plan prior to adjourning the Council meeting. He said he disagrees with the analysis that an addition to the airport runway end doubling the airport traffic will have no negative impacts on the Cities of Murrieta or Temecula. He said there is much more vacant land to the north of the airport and he feels the extension of the runway should be away from an existing and growing residential community. Councilmember Parks said he did not disagree, however, City staff has reviewed the plan and these issues were addressed and there is no significant impact on the city. Councilmember Munoz said he feels the County does not want to impose on any of their' potential developments as opposed to the already existing developments, in the City. Planning Director Gary Thornhill said staff can discuss this concern with the committee. Councilmember Munoz said he would the Council to make that recommendation to the committee. Mayor Roberts said he would support directing the committee to "examine extending the runway to the north". Councilmember Parks said he supports the direction, however, if the benefit is the same he would rather pay less. Councilmember Parks said he is concerned with an approved CC/PCMINO4/07194 4 O4/13/94 JOINT CITY COUNCIL/PLANNING COMMISSION MINtJTFS APRIL 7.1994 Mr. Fagan explained some the concerns staff has with the project as follows: Liquefaction and subsidence with the withdrawal of ground water (other water supplies are being explored) Deterioration of air quality Impacts to ground water basin, water quality, flooding and drainage Potential impacts to rare and endangered species Traffic safety and circulation (Most important issue) Noise, light and glare Land use compatibility Cost of providing governmental services (police, fire, etc.) Potential impacts to property values Director Thornhill explained a draft Environmental Assessment is being prepared at this time. He explained City Staff has responded to.a draft traffic study. He said once the final drafts are received, staff will be able to report on the overall impacts the project may have on the City of Temecula. Director Thornhill said once the Environmental Assessment is received, the City will have 30 days to respond to the report. Director Thornhill said the Indian Gaming Commission will determine whether there is no serious impacts or they will require a full E.I.S. Councilmember Stone asked if there have been any discussions with the indian tribe regarding mitigation of impacts. Principal Engineer Ray Casey said the indian band would not be able to contribute directly to the Assessment District, however, they have discussed being involved in some of the improvements needed. Councilmember Birdsall asked staff to look at designing the Pala Road Bridge as a toll bridge. Councilmember Munoz asked Director Thornhill to get the results from the marketing survey of the residents of the City of Temecula as directed by the indian tribe. Eric Brown, 45673 Clubhouse Drive, Temecula, representing several Homeowners Associations, asked staff to provide any information they are presented with to the homeowners. · Lyle Braun, 30370 Cupeno Lane, Temecula, expressed concern the Pala Road Bridge will not accommodate the traffic this project may generate. Jeff Stearns, 45835 Jeronimo, Temecula, said he is concerned about noise generated by the project and. flooding. He said a. hydrology .report, prepared at the request of the Wolf Valley Homeowners Association, indicates the creek bed wall would need to be reinforced to protect it from water runoff. CC/PCMINO4107/94 3 O4/13/94 JOINT CITY COUNCIL/PLANNINr~ COMMISSION MINUTFS apartment project at the end of the runway in the Silverhawk development. Mayor Pro Tem Stone said he supports the direction. City Manager Ron Bradley asked the Council to adjourn to a time certain to interview City Attorney candidates from the firm of Burke, Willlares and Sorrenson. The overall consensus of the Council was to meet on Monday, April 11, 1994, 7:00 P.M. at Temecula City Hall. APRIL 7.1994 ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Stone, seconded by Councilmember Parks to adjourn at 9:15 P.M. The motion was unanimously carried. The next regular meeting of the Temecula City Council will be held on Tuesday, April 26, 1994, 7:00 P.M., Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, · California. ATTEST: Mayor Ron Roberts June S. Greek, City Clerk /" CC/PCMINO4107194 6 INI13/94 MINUTES OF A SPECIAL MEETING OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL HELD APRIL 11, 1994 A special meeting of the Temecula City Council was called to order at 7:14 PM, in the Council Conference Room, Temecula City Hall, 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Mayor Ron Robarts presiding. PRESENT 5 COUNCILMEMBERS:. ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Muf~oz, Stone, Parks, Roberrs None Also present was City Manager Ronald E. Bradley PUBLIC COMMENTS No public comments were offered at this time. COUNCIL BUSINESS 1. Executive Session It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Mayor Pro Tam Stone, to adjourn the meeting to an Executive Session pursuant to Government Code Section 54957 to interview candidates from the Law firm of Burke, Williams and Sorensen for the position of City Attorney. The motion was unanimously carried. CITY MANAGER REPORTS No report given. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 8:43 PM to a Special meeting to be held at 10:00 AM on Tuesday, April 12, 1994 for the purpose of continued interviews of candidates for the position of City Attorney and to announce any decisions reached as a result of the interviews. ATTEST: Ron Roberts, Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk Minutee~4~l 1 ~94 * 1 - 04115/94 MINUTES OF A SPECIAL MEETING OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL HELD APRIL 12, 1994 A special meeting of the Temecula City Council was called to order at 10:12 AM, in the Council Conference Room, Temecula City Hall, 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Mayor Ron Roberts presiding. PRESENT 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Mu~oz, Stone, Parks, Roberts ABSENT: I COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall Also present was City Manager Ronald E. Bradley and City Clerk June S. Greek PUBLIC COMMENTS No public comments were offered at this time. COUNCIL BUSINESS 1. Executive Session It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Stone, seconded by Councilmember Muf~oz, to adjourn the meeting to an Executive Session pursuant to Government Code Section 54957 to interview candidates from the Law firm of Burke, Williams and Sorensen for the position of City Manager. The motion was unanimously carried. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was reconvened in regular session at-11:48 AM. It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Mayor Pro Te'm Stone adjourn at 11:50 AM to the regular meeting to be held at 7:00 PM on Tuesday, April 26, 1994 at the Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. ATTEST: Ron Roberrs, Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk Minutee~,4% 12%94 -1 - 04/15/94 ITEM NO. 3 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLIHION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN F_,XIn~IT A THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES P, ESOLVE~ D~TERMINt AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A have been audited by the City Manager, and tha~ the same are hereby allowed in the mount of $1,271,711.39. Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. APPROVFX) AND ADOFrED, this 26th day of April, 1994. ATTEST: Ron Roberts, Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS crrY OF TEMECLmA) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 94- was duly adopted 'at a rel~,ular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 26th day of April, 1994 by the following roll call vote: AYES: 0 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None COUNCILMEMBERS: None COUNCK,MEMBERS: None June S. Greek, City Clerk 16 2 ~ CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS 03/31/94 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 04/07/94 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 04114/94 TOTAL CHECK RUN: · 04126jIM TOTAL CHECK RUN: 64/07/94 TOTAL PAYROLL: TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 04/28/94 COUNCIL MEETING: DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND: CHECKS: ool GENERAL 100 GAS TAX 120 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FUND 165 RDA-LOW/MOD 190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ (CIP) /e=z~ TCSD-CIP RDA-CIP SELF-INSURANCE 310 VEHICLES 320 INFORMATIONS SYSTEMS 330 COPY CENTER 340 FACILITIES 380 RDA-DEBT SERVICE 390 TCSD DEBT SERVICE PAYROLL: 001 GENERAL (PAYROLL) 100 GAS TAX (PAYROLL) 190 · TCSD (PAYROLL) 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A (PAYROLL) 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B (PAYROLL) 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C (PAYROLL) 280 RDA-CIP 300 SELF-INSURANCE (PAYROLL) 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS (PAYROLL) 330 COPY CENTER (PAYROLL) 340 FACILITIES TOTAL BY FUND: "R/~ONALD E. 'BRADLEY, INTERIM CITY MANAGER ~_. S257,337.16 $145,303.89 181;075.79 S701,028.58 $106,~66.17 $1,271,711 1801,091.21 $115,228,70 $1,8t2.34 18,221 $1o,eae.ee 12~1,145.20 S84,584.47 $19,g63.27 $14,802.64 $15,647.48 $4,870,74 $a8,4o6,11 $1,164,745.22 $84,786.55 $17,248.22 116,85o.71 $,147.92 844.68 $1,755.70 886.64 S552.35 $1,339.88 $875.31 $1,611 .oo 1106,866.17 $1,271,711.3~ , HEREBY CERTIFY. THAT THE FOLLOWING I~ TRUE AND CORRECT. , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. VOUCHRE2 03/31/94 16:39 CITY OF TEffi;CULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PER]OOS FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 100 GAS TAX FUND 190 COleqUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND 250 CAPITAL PROJECTS - TCSD '320 INFORNAT]OR SYSTEMS 330 COPY CENTER FUND 340 FACILITIES TOTAL AMOUNT 1,611./~ 4,605.89 652.50 210,256.~, 2,64.3.07 2,99r3.60 ~9,780.55 257,337.16 03/ 16:39 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE 16216 03/25/96 16315 03/25/96 16335 03/28/96 16338 03/28/94 14343 03/31/94 16343 03/31/96 16363 03/31/96 16344 03/31/96 163~ 03/31/96 16345 03/31/94 14346 03/31/94 14347 03/31/94 14. 33/31/94 16348 03/31/94 ..14349 03/31/94 14349 03/31/94 14349 03/31/94 14349 03/31/94 14349 03/31/94 14350 03/31/94 14351 03/31/94 14352 03/31/94 14352 03/31/96 16352 03/31/96 14352 03/31/94 14353 03/31/94 14353 03/31/94 14354 03/31/94 14355 03/31/94 14356 03/31/94 16357 03/31/94 14357 03/31/96 VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 000542 D]SNEYLAND 000922 UNiVERSAL STUDIOS 001360 CALIFORNIA BUILDING COO 000216 LUNCH & STUFF CATERING 001357 ACTION COMMUNICATIONS, 001357 ACTION COMMUNICAT]ONS, 001357 ACTION COMMUNICAT/ONS, 000558 ADVANCED MOBILECOMB 000558 ADVANCED MOBILECOMB 001222 .000781 ALPHA COIqMUNICATIONS, I ASSOC. OF ENVIRONMENTAL 000765 AT & T - CELLULAR 001006 001006 BURTRON[CS BUSINESS SYS BURTRONICS BUSINESS SYS 000127 CALIFORNIAN - LEGAL 000127 CALIFORNIAN - LEGAL 000127 CALIFORNIAN - LEGAL 000127 CALIFORNIAN - LEGAL . 000127 CALIFORNIAN - LEGAL 000134 001195 CBCI PROFESSIONAL DEVIL CENTRAL SECURITY SERVIC 000137 CHEVRON U.S.A. INC, 000137 CHEVRON U.S,A. INC, 000137 CHEVRON U,S,A, INC. 000137 CHEVRON U,S.A. INC, 000138 000138 CITICORP NORTH AMERICA CITICORP NORTH AMERICA 000144 COSTCO' WHOLESALE 001366 CROWN CARPET & DRAPERIE 001317 DAVIS, MARY 000155 DAVLIN 000155 DAVLIN CITY OF TENECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOB ALL PERIODS ITEM ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION NLNBER TCSD TICKETS 1gO-183-~q-5340 TCSD TICKETS 1~0-183-~-5340 SEMINAR/BUILDING IBSPEC 001-162-~-5261 COUNCIL MEETINGS FOOD S 001-100-~-5260 PUBLIC SAFETY ,SERVICE L PREAMP BOX; POLICE DEPT TAX MARCH SERVICE:PALONAR MARCH SERVICE:ELSIMONE PAGER FOR TCSO DEPT, UORKSHOPIC. RU I Z 909-20~-1200-0 T,H. PAPER SUPPLIES PAPER SUPPLIES PUBLIC HOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICES · NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARIN NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARIN ENERGY SEMINAR INSTALLATION OF SECURIT GASOLINE CHARGES GASOLINE CHARGES GASOLINE CHARGES GASOLINE CHARGES PHONE LEASE PHT PHONE LEASE P~I' BBQ FOR TCSO DAY CAqP INSTALLATION OF FLOOR CLASS INSTRUCTON FEE AUDIO TAPE; PLANNING VIDEO/AUDIO TAPE - 001-170-~-5215 001-170-f~-5215 001-170-~-5215 320-1~-~-5208 320-1~-~-5208. 190-180-~-5238 001-161-~-5261 320-1~-~-5208 001-163-~-5220 001-163-~-5220 001-120-~-5256 1~0-180-~-5256 001-120-~-5256 001-161-~-5256 001-161-~-5256 001-162-~-5261 250-1~0-129-580~ 001-170-~-5262 001-110-~-5263 001-162-~-5263 001-161-~-5262 320-2800 320-199-999-5391 I~0-183-~-53A0 190-180-~-5212 1~0-183-~-5330 001-161-~-5250 001-100-~-5250 ITEM Ne3UMT 330.00 357.00 460.00' ~0.00 27.50 140.00 10.85 360.00 378.00 16.29 105.00 1.72 197.32 339.92 67.37 63.50 101.83 1,068.7~ 1.000.00- 260. O0 1,823.80 27~75 100.50 8.52 21.03 1,168.00 27~.57 200.00 /~0.00 8.00 150.00 701.67 PAGE 1 CHECK AROUNT 330.00 357.00 660.00 ~0.00 178.35 738.00 16.29 105.00 1.72 537.24 281.69 260.00 1o823.80 157.80 1,627.57 200.00 440.00 8.00 851.67 VCUCHRE2 03/31/96 14:39 CiTY OF TENECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUleER DATE NUMBER NAHE DESCR/PTION NUMBER 14358 03/31/~4 000518 DEL RiO CARE ANII~L HOS VET SERVICES FOR K-9 16359 03/31/96 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS EXPRESS NAIL 14360 03/31/96 0009~9 GKN RENTALS 14360 03/31/96 0009~9 GKN RENTALS SKIPLOADER RENTAL SKIPLOADER RENTAL 16361 03/31/96 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT NlSC. OFFICE PRODUCTS 16361 03/31/96 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PROIHJCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 14361 03/31/96 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-170-~-5327 001-110-999-5Z~0 100-1~-999-5~8 100-1~-999-5~8 001-140-999-5220 001-161-~-5220 Q01-161-999-5220 14362 03/31/96 000184 GTE CALIFORNIA iNCORPOR 909-699-0128 GENERAL US 320-199-~-5208 167~3 03/~1/94 000198 iNTERNATIONAL COUNCIL 0 HENBERSHIP JEFF STONE '001-100-~-5226 143(,3 03/31/94 000198 INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL 0 REGISTRATION NAY 94 CON 001-100-~-5258 143~53 03/31/96 000198 iNTERNATIONAL COUNCIL 0 REGISTRATION NAY 94 CON 001-110-~-5258 1/.7~4 03/31/96 000232 JOHN P. NEET, NAi PROPERTY VALUATiON(NICO 190-180-~-5250 14365 03/31/94 000886 KHALSA, ATNA KAUR CLASS iNSTRUCTOR FEE 16366 03/31/96 000206 KINKO'S OF RIVERSIDE, i STATIONERY 16367 03/31/96 000209 L & M FERTiLiZER, iNC. EAR MUFF & BRACKET 16368 03/31/94 001030 HINZ-GRAPHIC SYSTENS, I iNAGING SERVICE 16368 03/31/96 001030 HINZ-GRAPHIC SYSTEHS, I INAGING SERVICE 14368 03/31/94 001030 MINI'GRAPHIC SYSTENS, i INAGING SERVICE 14369 03/31/94 000883 HONTELEONE EXCAVATING EHERGENCY ROAD GRADING 14370 03/31/94 000587 NJNOZ, NARiO N. 14371 03/31/94 000231 NBS/L(NRY, iNC. 14372 03/31/9~ 001243 PALNQUIST, NARY 16373 03/31/96 001301 PLAYSAFE SURFACES, INC. CLEAR COAT PLAYSAFE NAT 190-180-999-5212 14373 03/31/94 001301 PLAYSAFE SURFACES, iNC. PLAYSAFE NATERiAL REPAZ 190-180-999-5212 14374 03/31/94 PUBLIC INTEREST PUBL]CA EHPLOYHENT PUBLICAT[OR 001-1/*0-~-5228 14375 03/31/94 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER WATER ACCTt02-7~-10100- 190-180-~-52/*0 16376 03/31/94 000678 RIVERSIDE COUNTY HEALTH INSPECTION FEE/CRC 250-190-129-5804 14377 03/31/9/* 000815 ROWLEY, CATHERINE CLASS INSTRUCTOR FEE 190-183-999-5330 16378 03/31/9/* 000385 SHELDON EXTINGUISHER CO 9 LB. HALOR FIRE EXTING 320-199-999-5242 14378 03/31/9/* 000385 SHELDON EXTINGUISHER CO TAX 320-199-999-5242 14378 03/31/9/, 000385 SHELDON EXTINGUISHER CO CRC FIRE EXTINGUISHERS 190-180-999-5212 1~0-183-~-5330 330-190-~-5220 100-16/*-~-5218 001-120-~-5250 001-120-9~9-5250 001-120-~-5250 100-164-~-5402 JANITORIAL SERVICES FOR 1~0-181-~-5250 ADDITIONAL LAND SURVEYZ 210-166-627-5802 CLASS INSTRUCTOR FEE 1~0-183-~-5330 iTEH NqOUNT 51.32 22.10 296.80 156.20- 53.17 9.53 3.93 305.51 50. O0 220.00 220,00 250.00 23.65 21.52 485.89 242.61 21,01 960. O0 200. O0 652.50 418.80 786.69 157.71 13.50 /,9.57 400. O0 146.80 125.50 9.73 389.50 CHECK ANOUNT 51.32 22.10 138.60 305.51 490.00 250.00 65 21.52 749.51 960.00 200.00 652.50 418.80 944.40 13.50 69.57 /*00.00 1/,6.80 VOUr 03~, .VOUCHER/ CHECK NLIHBER 14378 1437~ 1437~ 1437~ 14380 14380 14381 14381 14382 14382 14382 14382 14382 14382 14382 1438~ 14385 14385 14385 14385 14385 14386 14386 14386 14387 14387 14388 14389 14390 14391 14:39 CHECK DATE 03/31/W, 03/31/94 03/31/94 03/31/94 03/31/94 03/31/94 03/31/~, 03/31/94 03/31/94 03/31/94 03/31/94 03/31/94 03/31/~ 03/31/94 03/31/94 03/31/94 03/31/94 03/31/94 03/31/94 03/31/94 03/31/94 03/31/94 03/31/94 03/31/94 03/31/94 03/31/94 03/31/94 03/31/94 03/31/94 03/31/94 03131194 VENDOR NUMBER 000385 000706 000704 000704 0006~5 000645 000375 000375 000929 000929 000929 000929 000929 000929 000929 000305 000309 000319 000319 000319 000319 000319 000618 000618 000618 000326 0OO326 001065 001209 000342 000:~5 CITY OF TENECtJLA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM MAlE DESCRIPTION NUIIBER AMOUNT SHELDON EXTINGUISHER CO SKS, INC./INLAND OIL SKS, INC./INLAND OIL SKS, INC./INLAND OIL SMART & FINAL SMART & FINAL SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TEL SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TEL T.B. PENICK & SONS, lNC T.B. PENICK & SONS, INC T.B. PENICK & SONS, INC T,B. PENICK & SONS, INC T.B. PENICK & SONS, ]NC T.B, PEN[CK & SONS, ]NC T,B. PENICK & SONS, INC TARGET STORE TEMEOULA COPIERS TONARK SPORTS, INC. TONARK SPORTS, INC. TO/lARK SPORTS, INC. TONARK SPORTS, ZNC. TONARK SPORTS, INC. TRIGG INDUSTRIES WEST, TRIGG INDUSTRIES WEEST, TRZGG INDUSTRIES lIEST, UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE USCN/PEBSCO (DEF. CONP. VAULT, THE WINDSON PARTNERS - RANC XEROX CORPORATION B/LL/ CRC FIRE EXTINGUISHERS 190-180-~-5212 PETROLEUM DISTRIBUTORS PETROLEUH DISTRIBUTORS PETROLEUM DZSTRIBUTONS 001-162-;-5263 190-180-9~)-526S 100-164-;-52&1 FOOD AND PARTY SUPPLIES 1~0-182-~-5301 FOOD AND PARTY SUPPLIES 1~0'182'~9-5301 90~-202-4757 J.G. 001-120-;;5208 909-202-47&0 UNASSIGNE 320-1~-~)-5208 CRC PI~2-Z~B CONTRACT C CONTINGENCY FOR THE CON CONSTRUCTION OF THE CON CONSTRUCTION OF THE CRC CONTRACT CHANGE ORDERS RANCHO CAL SPORT PK WOR 2 STOP NOTICES F/LED 250-1~0-12~-5804 250-1~0-129-5804 250-1~0-12~-580~ 250-190-129-5804 250-1~0-129-5804 250-2035 250-2038 SUPPLIES FOR SR CENTER 1~0-181-~9~-5301 SERVICE CALL FOR'XEROX 001-140-~-5250 10245 - ANCHOR TOP PLAT 10350 - RECREATIONAL BU 10316 - RUBBER PLUGS (B FREIGHT TAX 1fo-183-~-53m) 190-183-999-5380 1~0-183-~q~-5380 190-183-999-5380 190-183-999-5380 1175 GRIP, ROAD TUBE (C FREIGHT TAX 100-164-~-5242 100-164-94,~-5242 100-164-~-5242 2 SETS OF UNIFORMS CLEA 100-164-~9-5243 UNIFONM RENTAL & CLEANI 1~0-180-~-5243 CON'TRIBUTIONS CONRECTIO 001-2080 STORAGE FON 02/15-03/15 001-120-~-5250 RENT FOR THE MONTH OF A 340-1~-~-523~ LEASE AGREEMENT; 5100 C 330-1~-~-5259 30.18 39.89 148.55 342.56 114.00 14.76 51.65 35.04 26,265.00 8,254.14 581,503.00 395,918.00- 17,325.77 5,654.28- 96 75.00 99.00 138.00 18.00 13.94 19.76 114.00 2.~ 8.~ 25.O0 16.10 190.00 186.02 29,780.55 PAGE 3 CHECK AMOUNT 554.91 531.00 128.76 208,032.64 96 .W, 75.00 288.70 125.76 39.10 190.00 186.02 29,780.55 TOTAL CHECKS 257,337.16 VOUCHRE2 0410819~ 13:06 CITY OF TENECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 100 GAS TAX FUND 190 CallUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 210 CAPITAL IHPROVEHENT PROJ FUND 280 REDEVELOPNENT AGENCY - CZP 300 INSURANCE FUND 310 VEHICLES FUND 320 INFORHATION SYSTENS 330 COPY CENTER FUND :540 FACILITIES TOTAL ANOUNT 65,818.21 14,417.27 16,255.48 200.87 1,815.13 25.00 30,756.51 1,426.99 902.31 4,691.89 7,938.41 145,303.69 vOl~ 04z - 13:0~ CITY OF TENECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR NIJ~BER DATE INllER NN~E ITEM ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION NUMBER IT~ CHECK AICUNT AIqOUMT 163:$9 03/30/9~ 001369 EURO DELl CATERZNG SERV./M;IIXHN. 001-150-999-5265 600.00 600.00 14392 04101194 CROSSROADS FURNITURE RDA LOAN PROCEEDS 280-1520 30,000. O0 30,000. O0 14393 04/0~/94 001376 TOYOTA OF TENEOULA VALL REPAIRS 310-180-999-5214 249.78 249.78 379672 04107/94 000283 FIRSTAX CIRS) 3?9672 04107/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 379672 0/,/07/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 379672 04/07/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IR$) 379672 04/07/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 379672 0/,/07/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 379672 04,/07/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 379672 04/07/94 000283 FIRSTAX {IRS) 379672 04/07/94 00028] FIRSTAX (IRS) 379672 04/07/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 379672 04/07/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 379672 04/07/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 379672 04/07/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 379672 04/07/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 379 04/07/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 37;A 0/,/07/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 379672 04/07/94 000283 F I RSTAX ( l RS ) 379672 04/07/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) .379672 04/07/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 379672 04/07/94 000283 F I RSTAX ( IRS ) 379672 04/07/94 000283 F I RSTAX ( I RS ) 379672 04/07/94 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 379672 04/07/94 O00z~4 FIRSTAX (EDD) 379672 04/07/94 000/,44 FIRSTAX (EDD) 379672 04/07/94 0004~ FIRSTAX (EDD) 379672 04/07/94 0004~ FIRSTAX (EDD) 379672 04/07/94 0004~4 FIRSTAX (EDD) 379672 04/07/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 379672 04/07/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 379672 04/07/9~ 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 379672 04/07/94 0004Z~4 FIRSTAX (EDD) 379672 04/07/94 0004~ FIRSTAX (EDD) 379672 04/07/94 00044/, FIRSTAX (EDD) 379672 04/07/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 37~672 04/07/94 OOe/:~/: FIRSTAX (EDD) 379672 04/07/94 O00ZHf4 .FIRSTAX (EDD) 379672 04/07/94 0004,~ FIRSTAX (EDD) 379672 04/07/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 379672 04/07/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 379672 04/07/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 379672 04/07/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 379672 04/07/94 OOO~.'~ FIRSTAX (EDD) 379672 04/07/94 000444 FIRSTAX (EDD) 379672 04/07/94 0004~ FIRSTAX (EDD) 000283 FEDERAL' 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 NED I CARE 00028~ NED l CARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 FEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 BED l CARE 000283 NED l CARE 000283 NED l CARE 000283 MED I CARE 000283 NED 1 CARE 000283 NED I CARE 000444 SDI O00t~t~ , SDI 000~/~/~ SD l 000/~-~ SD l O00z,~/; SD l O004z~ SDI 00044~ SDI O00/~f, SD l 0004/~ SDI 000444 STATE ~ STATE 000444 STATE O~ STATE 00044~ STATE 00044~ STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE 0004~,4 STATE O004M, STATE 0004/~ STATE 001-2070 100-2070 190-2070 191-2070 192-2070 19:$-2070 280-2070 320-2070 :$~0-2070 34.0-2070 100-2070 190-2070 191-2070 192-2070 193-2070 280 - 2070 300-2070 320-2070 330-2070 340-2070 001-2070 100-2070 190-2070 191-2070 192-2070 193-2070 280-2070 300-2070 320-2070 :~0-2070 001-2070 100-2070 190-2070 191-2070 192-2070 193-2070 280-2070 300-2070 320-2070 3:$0-2070 3/~0- 2070 8,927.4-1 3,048.85 2,384.35 88.48 44.11 252.27 131 77.87 246.24 89.27 76.07 2,466.93 656.92 608,90 17.70 26.54 62,04 31.70 20.43 54°08 52.00 1,094.95 294.47 7.93 11 27.81 14.20 9.15 24.25 10.25 23.31 2,248.35 737.82 519.98 22.72 1.26 50.79 29.50 25 55 15.71 24,891.67 VOIJCHRE2 CZTY OF TEMECUIJL 04/08/94 13:06 VOIJCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERZ(X)S VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ]TEN ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPT/OR . NUMBER ITEM N40UNT CHECK AMOUNT 14397 04107/94 000105 AEZ SECURITY, INC. ALAR!4 MONZTORING/CTY HA 340-19~-99~-5250 14398 04/07/94 000921 AETNA CASUALTY AND SURE INSURANCE/FIRE 300-199-999-52(X. 105.00 393.00 105.00 393.00 14399 04/07/94 001371 AOUIRRE, EDgARD VIDEO MEMORIAL 001-150-999-5250 90.00 90.00 16600 04/07/94 001375 AMERICAN CORSTRUCTIOR MEMIIERSHIP RENEUAL 001-163-999-5226 300.00 300.00 162,0104/07/94 001381 AUDIO-TECH BUSINESS BOO SUBSCRIPTION 001 - 140-~-5228 135.00 135.00 14402 04/07/94 AUSTIN DIVERSIFIED DIVERSIFIED-REFUND FOR 001-199-4056 35.00 35.00 14403 04/07/94 000116 AVP VISION PLANS PREMIUM APRIL 94 001-Z310 14403 04/07/94 000116 AVP VZSIOR PLANS PREMILIN APRIL 94 100-Z310 14403 04/07/94 000116 AVP VISION PLANS PREMIUM APRIL 96 190-2310 14403 04/07/94 000116 AVP VISION PLANS PREMIUM APRIL 94 191-2210 16603 04/07/96 Q00116 AVP VISION PLANS PREMIUM APRIL 94 193-2210 16603 04107194 000116 AVP VISION PLANS PREMIUM APRIL 96 280-2310 14403 04/07/94 000116 AVP VISION PLANS PREMIUM APRIL 96 300-2210 14403 04107194 000116 AVP VIS]OR PLANS PREMIUM APRIL 96 330-2210 14403 06/07/94 000116 AVP VISION PLANS PREMIUM APRIL 96 340-2210 14403 04/07/94 000116 AVP VISION PLANS PREMIUM APRIL 96 001-1180 385.04 131.92 97.15 4.14 5.06 9.45 3.94 15.75 15.75 26.93 14404 04/07/94 000623 BARB'S BALLOONING AFFAI BALLOONS FOR EASTER EGG 190'183'999'5370 96.97 · 96.97 14405 04/07/94 BART JORDAN JORDAN/REFUND 190-183-4982 71.00 70.00 14406 04/07/94 BIG AL'S FURNITURE REST BIG AL'S'REFUND FOR B.L 001'199'6056 35.00 35. O0 14407 04/07/94 000878 BOYS & GIRLS CLUB DRAg 21 001-1500 14408 04/07/94 000129 CAL gEST RENTAL CENTER RENTAL EQUIP. 190-180-999-5228 14408 04/07/94 000129 CALMEST RENTAL CENTER RENTAL EQUIP. 190-180-999-5238 14408 04/07/94 000129 CAL gEST RENTAL CENTER RENTAL EQUIP. 190-180-999-5238 33.51 34.48 21.33 89.32 14409 04107194 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, ANNUAL PREMIUM-EQ.FLOAT 300-19~-~-5200 588. O0 588.00 14410 04/07/94 000837 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TA 000837 FRAN TAX 001-2160 14410 04107/94 000837 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TA 000837 FRAN TAX 100-2160 1441104/07/94 000136 CBCI.PROFESSIONAL DEVEL SEMINAR FOR TONY ELi) 001-162-999-5261 14412 04/07194 CHRIS LUKER SHAVED ICE CHRIS LUKER-REFUND FOR 001-199-4056 14413 04/07/94 000662 CITY OF TEMECULA - FLEX REIMB. 04/07/94 OO1-1020 14613 04/07/94 000642 CITY OF TEMECULA - FLEX REIMB. 04/07/96 190-1020 14613 04/07/94 000662 CITY OF TENECULA - FLEX REIMB. 04/07/94 1OO-1020 14613 04/07/94 000662 CITY OF TEMECULA - FLEX REIMB. 04/07/94 300-1020 14613 04/07/94 000642 CITY OF TEMEOULA - FLEX RE]MB. 04/07/94 280-1020 14613 04/07/94 000662 CITY OF TEMECULA - FLEX REIMB. 04/07/94 330-1020 105.00 35.00 3,263.12 726.66 40.59 21.25 2.00 16.25 187.92 105.00 35.00 4,049.87 V~ CITY OF TEHECULA 04/ · 13:06 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NLJHSER DATE NUI4BER MANE DESCRIPTION NtNBER 14414 04107194 000~89 COBB GROUP THE INSIDE NETWARE JOURNAL 320-1~-9~-5228 14415 04107194 000140' COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN PREMIUM APRIL 94 0Ol-2330 14415 04/07/94 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN PREMIUM APRIL ~4 100-2330 14415 04/07/~4 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCZDEN PREMIUM APRIL 94 190-2330 14415 041071~4 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN PREMIUM APRIL ~4 191-2330 14415 04/07/94 000140 COLOR]AL LIFE & ACCZDEN PREMIUM APRIL 94 193-2330" 14415 04107194 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN PREMIUM APRIL 94 280-2330 14415 04107194 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN PREMIUM APRIL 94 330-2330 14415 04107194 000140 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN PREMIUM APRIL 94 340-2330 ITEM AHOUMT 126.85 9.75 132.00 11.48 14.02 3.90 19.50 25.50 CHECK AIIXINT 14416 04107194 001378 CONFORT INN BAND MENBERS/SEN,CTR 190-18,3-999-5370 375.84 375 14417 04107/94 001193 CONP USA, iNC. 84,3163 3 1/2 DSND DISICE 32Q-199-999-5221 14417 04/07/~ 001193 CONP USA, ZNC. 800/,22 PRAC FAXliEtSfiCH 320-1~-~-5221 14417 04/07/94 001193 COIqP USA, INC. FREIGHT 320-199-99~-5221 14417 04/07/94 001193 CONP USA, INC. TAX 320-199-~9~-5221 135.00 240.~ 7.50 2~.10 412.0~ 14418 04/07194 000447 CONTRORIX OF HEMET TK-930-HDK KEINOOD 800 320-1950 14418 04107194 000447 CONTRON]X OF HEHET $PC:-15R SPECO 15W OUTSI 320-1~50 1~'~' 04/07/94 0004~,7 CCI4TRONZX OF HEMET TG-1SPKR. SWITCH ~Y 320-'1950 14 04107194 000447 CONTRONIX OF HEMET 15615 HAXRAD NAX-8053 3 320-1950 14418 04107194 000447 COMTRONIX OF HEMET 14~04 NAXRAD MltL-CP~CAB 320-1950 14418 04/07/94 000447 CONTRONZX OF HEMET INSTALLATION LABOR 320-1950 14418 04/07/94 000447 CONTRONZX OF HENET TAX 320-1950 14419 04/07/94 001368 CROWN STERLING SUITES H HOTEL FOR 11550 SCHOOL 001-170-9~-5261 1,015.00 60.00 10.00 21.~0 26.20 150.00 87.7~ 5?8.88 1,370.59 5?8.88 14420 04/07/94 001370 DAVE HEABERLIN WELDING RACKS FOR STENCIL TRUCK 100-164-99~-5215 50,00 50.00 14421 04/07/94 000156 DENTICARE OF CALIFORNIA PREMIUM FOR APRIL '94 001-2340 14421 04/07/94 000156 DENTICARE OF CALIFORNIA PREMIUM FOR APRIL' '94 100-2340 14421 04/07/94 000156 DENTICARE OF'CALIFORNIA .PREMIUM FOR APRIL ~4 0O1-150-~-5250 -2f.86 15.00 59.79 14422 04/07/94 001125 DIGITAL TELECOMffiJNZCATI LAg CHG PHONE HOOK-UP 320-1~-ggg-5215 14422 04/07/94 001125 DIGITAL TELECOIe4UMICATI LABOft CHG PHONE HOOK-UP 320-1~-;-5215 14422 04/07/94 001125 DIGITAL TELECONNUN[CATI ETW-16DD-1(BK)'TELEPHON )20-1~-;-5242 14422 04/07/94 001125 DIGITAL TELECONNtJNICAT! HISC NARDWARE )20-1~-gg9-5242 14422 04/07/94 001125 DIGITAL TELECONffiJNICATI TAX 320-1~-;-5242 60.00 5~6.~) 7.50 46.80 8O0.70 14423 04/07/94 000~46 DISCOUNT FEED & TACK K-9 DOG FOOD 001-170-~-5327 53.85 53.85 14424 04/07/94 000523 E.M.W.D. SEllER SERV. K.H. PARK 210-1~0-1~-5802 25.0O 25.0O 14425 04107/94 000~3 FREEDOM COFFEE,/NC. MISt. COFFEE SUPPLIES 340-199-999-5250 136.31 13~.31 14426 04/07/94 001103 FREEDOM MATERIALS 14426 04/07/94 001103 FREEDOM MATERIALS 70 BAGS 100 LBS SILICA 100-164-~99-5218 TAX 10O-164-99~-5218 110.25 8.54 118.79 14427 04/07/94 000351 GILLIS, FlAX C.N. CRC ENTERTAINMENT 10O-183-999-5370 225.0O 225.0O VOUCHRE2 04/08/94 13:06 CITY OF TENECULA VOUCHER/CHECKREGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 14428 14428 14428 14428 CHECK DATE 04107194 041071~4 04107194 04107194 VENDOR NUMBER 00017/ 000177 000177 000177 VENDOR N/~IE GLENNIE$ OFFICE PRODUCT GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT ITEM DESCRIPTION OFFICE SUPPLIES OFF]CE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-140-999-5220 001-150-999-5220 001-150-999-5220 001-140-999-5220 ITEM ;T 52.56 7~.38 198.77 29.61 CHECK AI, MXJNT 360.32 14429 14430 14430 14430 14430 14430 14430 14430 14430 14430 14430 14430 14430 14430 14430 14430 14430 14430 14430 14430 14430 14430 14430 14430 14430 14430 14430 14430 14430 14430 14430 14430 14430 14430 14431 14431 14431 04/07/94 04107/94 04/07/94 04/07/94 04/07/94 04/07/94 04/07/~ 04/07/94 04/07/94 04/07/94 04/07/94 04/07/94 04/07/94 04/07/94 04/07/94 04/07/94 04/07/94 04107194 04/0?/94 04/0?/94 04/0?/94 04/0?/94 04/07/94 04/07/94 04/07/94 · 04/07/94 04/07/94 04/07/94 04/07/96 04/07/94 04/07/94 04/07/94 04/07/94 04/07/94 04/07/94 04107194 04107194 000711 000765 000765 000765 000765 000765 000765 000765 000765 000765 000765 000765 000765 000765 000765 000765 000765 000765 000765 000765 000765 000765 000765 000765 000765 000765 000765 000765 000765 000765 000765 000765 000765 000765 000430 OOO430 000430 GRAPHICS UNLIMITED LITH GROUP AMERICA GROUP AHERICA GROUP AMERICA GROUP ANERICA GROUP AMERICA GROUP AMERICA GROUP N4ERICA GROUP AMERICA GROUP AJ4ERICA GROUP AMERICA GROUP N4ER l CA GROUP ANER l CA GROUP AMER I CA GROUP AMERICA GROUP ANER[CA GROUP ANER[CA GROUP AMERICA GROUP ANERICA GROUP AMER [ CA GROUP ANERICA GROUP ANERICA GROUP ANERICA GROUP AMERICA GROUP AMERICA GROUP AMERICA GROUP AMERICA GROUP ANERICA GROUP AMERICA GROUP AMERICA GROUP ANER]CA GROUP ANER ] CA GROUP AMERICA GROUP ANER]CA GROUP AHERICA - VOLUNTA GROUP N4ERICA - VOLUNTA GROUP AMERICA - VOLUNTA BROCHURE/CITY likNAGER LIFE/AD&D FOR APRIL '94 LIFE/AD&D FOR APRIL '9/, LIFElAD&I) FOR APRIL '9~ LIFE/AD&D FOR APRIL '94 LIFE/AD&D FOR APRIL ~94 LIFE/AD&D FOR APRIL ~94 LIFE/AD&D FOR APRIL ~94 LIFE/AD&D FOR APRIL ~94 LIFE/AD&D FOR APRIL ~94 LIFE/AD&D FOR APRIL ~94 LIFE/AD&D FOR APRIL LTD FOR APRIL LTD FOR APRIL ~94 LTD FOR APRIL '94 LTO FOR APRIL ~94 LTD FOR APRIL ~9~ LTD FOR APRIL #9~ LTD FOR APRIL '94 LTO FOR APRIL ~9~ LTO FOR APRIL #9~ LTD FOR APRIL LTD FOR APRIL STD FOR APRIL STD FOR APRIL ~94 STD FOR APRIL #94 STD FOR APRIL STO FOR APRIL ~94 STD FOR APRIL #94 STD FOR APRIL #94 STD FOR APRIL ~94 STD FOR APRIL '94 STD FOR APRIL ~94 STD FOR APRIL'~94 VOL LIFE FOR APRIL '94 VOL LIFE FOR APRIL '9~ VOL LIFE FOR APRIL '94 001-150-999-5222 001-2360 100-2360 190-2360 191-2360 192 - 2360 193-2360 280-23450 300-2360 320-2360 330-2360 340-2360 001-2380 100-2380 190-2380 191-2380 192-2380 193-2380 280-2380 300-2380 320-2380 330-2380 340-2~80 001-2500 100-2500 1~0-2500 191-2500 192-2500 193-2500 280-2500 300-2500 320-2500 330-2500 340-2500 001-2510 100-2510 190-2510 731.62 526.30 128.25 133.00 4,28 9.50 14.72 5.70 6.75 9.50 9.50 19.00 833.28 226.99 19/,.67 5.89 8.25 20.91 13.29 7.76 18.67 8.72 18.42 182.78 69.50 42.82 1.30 1.81 4.60 2.92 1.71 4.1i 1.92 4.05 211.80 22.80 89.00 731.62 2,518.87 323.60 14432 14432 14432 04/07/94 04/07/94 04/07/94 000184 000184 000184 GTE CALIFORNIA ]NCONPON GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPOR GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPOR (909) 694-6400 TELEPHON (909) 695-3539 TELEPHON (909) 699-2309 TELEPHON 320-199-999-5208 320-199-999-5208 320-199-999-5208 570.30 22.91 24.21 617.42 14433 04/07/94 000186 HANKS HARDWARE MlSC. EOUIPNENT 100-164-999-5242 29.07 14433 04/07/94 000186 HANKS HARDWARE MISC. SUPPLIES 100-16~-999-5242 14.53 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 14433 14433 14434 14434 14434 14434 14434 14434 14434 14434 14435 14436 14437 14438 14 14~ 14440 14440 14441 14442 14443 14443.· 14443 14443 14443 14443 14443 14443 14443 14443 14444 1~ 14444 14444 14444 14445 13:06 CHECK DATE O4/O7/94 04/07/~ 04107/94 04/07'/94 04/07/94 04107/94 04/07/94 04/07/94 04107/~4 04107194 04/07/94 04/07/94 04107194 04107194 Q4/07/94 J4/07/94 04/07/94 04/07/94 04/07/94 04/07/94 04/07/94 04/07/94 04/07/94 04/07/94 04107/94 04/07/94 04/07/94 04/07/94 04/07/94 04107194 04/07/94 04/07/94 04107/94 04/07/94 04107/94 04/07/94 04/07/~ 0001~ 0001~. 000194 000194 000194 000194 O001W, 00019~ 001377' 000201 000206 000214 000214 000226 000226 000883 000731 000431 000/,31 00(031 000431 '000431 000431 000431 000431 000431 000431 000431 000727 000727 000727 000727 000727 000233 CITY OF TENECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITB4 NAME DESCRIPTION INllER N!OUIIT HANKS HARDMARE HANKS HARDMARE SUPPLIES AND EQUIPtENT 190-180-999-5212 SPORTS SUPPLIES 190-183-999-5380 ]CIqA RETIREIENT TRUST 4 00019~ DEF COW> 001-2080 ICP, A RET!RENENT TRUST 4 000194 DEF CONP 100-2080 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST 4 000194 DEF COMP 190-2080 ICNA RETIREMENT TRUST 4 000194 DEF COMP 191-2080 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST 4 0001~ DEF CCI4P 1~3-2080 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST 4 0001~ DEF CClIP 280-2080 ICNA RETIREMENT TRUST 4 0001W, DEF cee 300-2O80 ICKA RETIREMENT TRUST 4 0001~4 DEF COMP 340-2080 INLAND EMPIRE MANAGER'S JENNACO KINKO'S OF RIVERSIDE, I LA GRECA, JACK LUNCH & STUFF CATERING LUNCH & STUFF CATERING MICRO AGE COHPUTER CENT MICRO AGE COMPUTER CENT NONTELEONE EXCAVATING NATIONAL CAREER WORKSHO NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH, NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH, NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH, NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH, NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH, NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH, NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH, NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH, NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH, NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH, NATIONAL DENTAL HEALTH, NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTIO NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTIO NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTIO NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTIO NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTIO NELSON, SHA~N DUES MANAGERS AS$OC. 001-110-9~9-5226 CUSTODIAL MAINTENANCE 100-182-~-5212 MISC. PRINTING PLAN DEP 001-161-f99-5222 LA ORECA/REFUffi) 001 - 162-4266 CATERING/MEHOR]AL COUNCIL MTG CATERING 001-120-~-5250 001-100-~-5260 HP LASERJET Ill TONER C 320-1~-~-5221 TAX 320-1W-~-5221 SHOULDER GIL4DING ON N.G 100-16~-~-5402 SEMINAR/SUPERVISION 001-162-~-5261 DENTAL FOR APRIL '~ DENTAL FOR APRIL '~ DENTAL FOR APRIL '~4 DENTAL FOR APRIL '~/, DENTAL FOR APRIL '~ DENTAL FOR APRIL '~ DENTAL FOR APRIL '~4 DENTAL FOR APRIL 'W, DENTAL FOR APRIL '~4 DENTAL FOR APRIL '~ DENTAL FOR APRIL '~ 001-2340 100-2340 100-2:340 191-2340 lf3-23~0 280-2340 300-23~0 330-Z~0 340-Z3~0 001-1180 001 - 150JF~9-5250 FIRE ALARM 001-171-999-5228 9~ SPRINKLER CODE NAItUA 001-171-999-5296 NFPA INSPECTION MANUAL 001-171-~-5296 FREIGHT 001-171-999-5Z9~ TAX 001-171-~-5L~ CPRS CONF/2/3-2/5 1~0-180-;~-5258 6~.~8 7.01 1,965.20 554.4~ 4~ .~ '34.00 41 .(~ 5.00 25.37 50.00 20.00 400.00 40.21 45.00 450.00 80.00 395. O0 30.~. 98,00 538.72 1i'8.72 130.00 · 7.31 8.9/. 9.1'5 4.06 16.25 16.25 32.50 15.00 50 .~8 24.75 52.75 4.15 5.92 PAGE 5 CHECK AMOUNT 744.59 3,172.73 20.00 400.00 40.21 · 45.00 530.00 425.&2 ~00.00 98.00 957.5O 138.25 9.~ lz~6 04/07/94 0002]90LSTEN TEMPORARY SERVIC TEMPORARY SERVICESIOLST 001-162-999-5118 256.06 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TENECULA 04/08/94 13:06 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ZTEN NUHBER DATE NUI4BER NAHE DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUHBER ITEN AHOUNT CHE, CK AHOUNT 14446 04/07/94 000?.39 1~6 04/07/94 000239 14447 04/07/94 00136? OLSTEN TENPORARY SERV]C OLSTEN TENPORARY SERV]C ORANGE COUNTY SHERIFF TEI4PORARY SERVICES TEMPORARY SERVICES/OLST REGISTRATION FOR 11550 001-162-999-5118 001-162-999-5118 001-170-999-5261 107.94 36~.00 86,00 728.00 86.00 lz~8 04/07/94 000545 PAC TEL CELLULAR - S.D. 1075255031594/NJ 001-140-9~-5208 171.25 171.25 lzdd,9 04/07/94 000525 PARKS, RONALD J. REINB, FOR TRAVEL 1/26- 001-100-999-5258 17.00 17.00 14450 04107/94 000245 1/~50 04/07/94 000245 1/~50 04/07/94 000245 14450 04/07/94 000245 14450 04/07/94 000245 14450 04/07/94 000245 14450 04/07/94 000245 14450 04/07/94 000245 14450 04/07/94 000245 14450 04/07/94 000245 14451 04/07/94 000246 14451 04/07/94 000246 14451 04/07/94 000246 14451 04/07/94 000246 14451 04/07/94 000246 14451 04/07/94 000246 1~451 04/07/94 000246 14451 04/07/94 000246 14451 04/07/94 000246 14451 04/07/94 000246 14451 0/,/07/94 000246 14451 04/07/94 000246 14451 04/07/94 000246 14451 04/07/94 000246 14451 04/07/94 000246 14451 04/07/94 0002/,6 14451 04/07/94 000246 14451 04/07/94 000246 14451 04/07/94 000246 14451 04/07/94 000246 14451 04/07/94 000246 14451 04/07/94 000246 14451 04/07/94 000246 14451 04/07/94 000246 14452 04/07/94 0002~8 14452 04/07/94 000248 14452 04/07/94 000248 PERS (HEALTH ]NSUR,PREN PERS (HEALTH ]NSUR,PREM PERS (HEALTH INSUR,PREM PERS (HEALTH ]NSUR,PREN PERS (HEALTH INSUR,PREN PERS (HEALTH 'INSUR,PREN' PERS (HEALTH ]NSLJR,PREN PERS (HEALTH ]NSUR,PREN PERS (HEALTH INSUR,PREN PERS (HEALTH INSUR,PREN PERS EMPLOYEES' RETIREN PERS ENPLOYEES' RETIREN PERS ENPLOYEES~ RETIREN PERS ENPLOYEES~ RETIREM PERS ENPLOYEES~ RETIREN PERS ENPLOYEES~ RETIREN PERS ENPLOYEES# RETIREN PERS ENPLOYEES# RETIREN PERS ENPLOYEES~ RETIREN PERS ENPLOYEES~ RETIREN PERS ENPLOYEES~ RETIREN PERS ENPLOYEES~ RETIREN PERS EHPLOYEES' RET[REN PERS ENPLOYEES~ RETIREN PERS ENPLOYEES# RETIREN PERS ENPLOYEES# RETIREN PERS ENPLOYEES~ RETIREN PERS ENPLOYEES~ RETIREN PERS ENPLOYEES~ RET]REN PERS ENPLOYEES~ RET]REN PERS ENPLOYEES~ RET]REN PER$ ENPLOYEES' RETIREN PERS ENPLOYEES' RETIREN PER$ ENPLOYEES'RETIREN PETROLANE PETROLANE PETROLANE HEALTH INSJR FOR APRIL HEALTH INSJR FOR APRIL HEALTH INSJR FOR APRIL HEALTH [MSUR FOR APRIL HEALTH INSJR FOR APRIL *HEALTH INSUR FOR APRIL HEALTH INSUR FOR APRIL HEALTH INSUR FOR APRIL HEALTH [NSUR FOR APRIL HEALTH INSUR FOR APRIL 000246 PER REDE 000246 PER REDE 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERS RET 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR 000246 SURVIVOR FUEL B&S PETROLANE FUEL 001-2090 100-2090 190-2090 191-2090 · 193-2090 280-2090 300-2090 330-2090 340-2090 001-150-999-5250 001-2130 100-2130 O01 - 2390 1 O0 - 2390 190-2390 191 -Z~90 192-2390 193-2390 ?..80-2390 300-2390 320-2390 330-2390 34.0-Z390 O01 - 2390 100-2390 190-2390 191-2390 192-2390 193-2390 280-2390 300-Z390 320-2390 330-2390 3~0-2390 190-180-999-5263 001 - 162-999-5263 190-180-999-5263 12,244.08 3,861.81 3,981.04 135.95 469.74 252.93 143.88 302.11 422.93 119.55 107.35 107.35 10,349.07 2,732.33 2,467.14 80.06 96.5? 2~.40 155.58 95.94 232.35 104.86 222.10 54.8~ 12.54 13.02 .42 .93 .56 .46 .93 1.86 21,934.82 17,123.08 307.37 14453 04/07/94 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMB. 001-100-999-5260 9.6] 14453 04107/94 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMB. 001-163-999-5218 14.87 V(r CITY OF TBIECtJLA 04, ,, 13:06 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEH ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE NUliER NAME DESCRIPTION NUliER [TEN ANOUNT CHECK AMOUNT lz~,53 041071~ 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH RE[ll. 001-1d3-;-5260 14453 04/07/94 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH RE]IN. 001-160-999-5260 14453 04/07/94 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH RE]IN. 001-199-6070 14453 04107194 000249 PETTY .CASH PETTY CASH RE]NB. 001-150-999-5260 14453 04/07/94 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIIN. 001-161-999-5220 14453 04/07/94 000269 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIIN. 001-161-;-52(d) 14453 04/07/94 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REINB. 001-162-999-5260 14453 04/07/94 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REINB. 190-180-;-5222 14453 04/07/94 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REI!i. 190-180-999-5230 14453 04/07/94 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH RE]IN.' 190-180-999-5301 14453 04107194 000269 PETTY CASH PETTY CASHRE]IN. 190-181-999-5301 14453 04/07/94 OOO249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMB. 190-1~3-999-5370 14453 04/0?/94 000269 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REZIN. 329-199-999-5262 32.99 20.00 .10 17.87 9.10 12.00 12.00 25.86 7.05 22.94 49.60 2.69 8.60 245.30 ' 14454 04/07/94 001382 PFF CONCORDIA CASH DEPORZT RELEASE 001-2650 5,000.00 5,000.00 14455 04107/94 000251 PLANNING CENTER, INC. T JAN 1-JAN 30 TOWER CTR 001-161-99f-5248 2,125.00 2,125.00 14456 04/07/94 000992 RAIONA TIRE, INC. BREAK REPAIR/IN 310-164-~-5214 I 04107194 000266 RIGHT~AY RENT TOILET 100-164-~q~-573,8 652.53 57.39 652.53 57.39 14458 04/07/94 001169 RIVERSIDE COUNTY CLERK PROCESS FEE FOR S.H.PAR 280-199-805-5802 14459 04/07/94 001088 RORY RIECK TRACTOR idORK IdEED ABATEMENT/28613 PU 001-162-999-5440 78.00 240. O0 78.00 260.00 14460 04/07/94 ROSALINDA RICHARDSON RICHANDSON R.-REFUND 190-183-4982 43.00 1446104/07/94 001374 SECRETARY OF STATE UCC-1 FILING FEE 280-199-999-5250 1446104107194 001374 SECRETARY OF STATE RDA LOAN FILING FEE ' 280-199-999-5250 5.00 5.00 14462 04107/94 000403 SHAtlN SCOTT POOL & SPA POOL HAINTENANCE 190-180-999-5212 212.80 212.80 14463 04107/94 SHERRI NOSBUSCH NOSBUSCH S,-REFUND CANC 190-183-4'Ni2 30.00 30,00 14464 04/07/94 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR PEST CONTROL 190-181-999-5250 14464 04107/94 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR PEST CONTROL 340-199-999-5250 14464 04/07/94 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR PEST CORTROL 340-199-999-5230 29.00 42.00 42.00 113.00 14465 04/07/94 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2/23-03/23 190-180-999-5240 14465 04107/94 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 02/23-03/23 100-164-999-5240 14465 04/07/94 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2/23-0)/28 340-199-999-5260 14465 04/07/94 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 02/23-0~/28 193-180-999-5240 144~ 04107194 001212 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS 2/24-03/25 1fO-181-fff-5240 25.55 6,659.18 556.73 54.41 7,898.45 54.41 16467 04/07/94 000373 SOUTHERN CALIFONNIA TEL 14468 04/07/94 SUNGHEN 14469 04/07/94 0OO304 TAB PROOUCTS COt4PANY 909-202-4770/DD OO1-110-~9-5208 SUNCHEN-REFUND OF VITNE 001-199-6060 CONPUOOLOR LABELS 1277- 001-120-999-5220 201.71 80.00 19.80 201.71 H.~ VOUCNRE2 04/08194 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 16669 16669 14470 14471 1~r,73 14473 lz~73 1447'5 1/~,74 1447~ 14475 14475 14475 14.475 14476 14476 14476 13:06 CHECK DATE 04/07/94 04/07/94 04/07/94 04107/94 04/07/94 04/07/94 04/07/~ 04/07/94 04/07/94 04/07/94 04/07/94 04/07/94 04/07/94 04/07/94 04107194 04/07/94 04/07/94 04/07/94 04/07/94 04/07/94 VENDOR NUllER 000304 000304 000168 000668 000322 000322 000325 000325 000325 000325 000326 000326 001065 001065 001065 001065 001065 000389 000389 000389 VENDOR NAME TAB PRODUCTS COIlANY TAB PRODUCTS COMPANY TEMEOULA FLOWER CORRAL TINNY D. PRODUCTIONS UNIGLODE BUTTERFIELD TR UNIGLOBE BUTTERFIELD TR UNITED MAY OF THE IWLAN UNITED WAY OF THE INLAN UNITED gAY OF THE INLAN UNITED WAY OF THE INLAN UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE USCN/PEBSCO (DEF. COffi>. USCN/PEBSCO (DEF. COMP. USCM/PEBSCO (DEF. CONP. USCH/PEBSCO (DEF. COMP. USCM/PEBSCO (DEF. COMP. USCM/PEBSCO, (ODRA) USCN/PEBSCO, (OBRA) USCM/PEBSCO, (OBRA) CITY OF TENEOULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION COMPUCOLOR LABELS 1277- TAX FL(NERS FOR SALLY GILBE ENTERTAINMENT CRC OPENI CREDIT AIR FAIR FOR T.ALVAREZ 000325 UW 000325 tN 000325 tN 000325 LN 2 SETS OF UNIFORMS CLEA UNIFORM RENTAL 001065 DEF CONP 001065 DEF cOMP 001065 DEF COMP 001065 DEF CONP 001065 DEF COle 000389 PT RETIR 000389 PT RETIR 000389 PT RETIR ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-120-999-5220 001-120-~99-5220 001-150-~9-5265 190-18U-999-5250 001-140-999-5258 001-162-999-5261 001-2120 100-2120 190-2120 280-2120 100-164-999-5243 190-180-999-5243 001-2080 100-208U 190-2080 300-2080 320-208U 001-2160 100-2160 190-2160 ITEM AMOUNT 19.80 6.30 400.00 136.00- 161.00 78.90 1.00 17.00 .60 23.00 16.10 5,018.52 197.98 156.32 3.~6 312.50 43.98 ~6.00 156.72 CHECK AMOUNT 45.90 90.51 400.00 25. O0 97.50 39.10 TOTAL CHECKS 145,303.69 16:08 CITY OF TENECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 100 GAS TAX FUND 190 CONNUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 210 CAPITAL INPROVENENT PROJ FUND 250 CAPITAL PROJECTS - TCSD 280 REDEVELOP~ENT AGENCY - CIP 300 INSURANCE FUND 310 VEHICLES FUND 320 ]NFORIqAT]ON SYSTENS 330 COPY CENTER FUND 340 FACILITIES TOTAL AHOUNT 13,613.28 5,012.03 12,166.81 255.60 8,020.76 600.56 489.72 1,891.00 61.01 12.32 13,900.33. 3,121 1,2~3 687.15 61,075.79 VOUCHRE2 04/14/94 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 16,678 14482 144B 14484 1441~6 14484 14484 14484 14485 14486 14486 14487 14487 14488 14489 14490 14490 14490 14491 14492 14493 14494 14495 14495 14496 14497 14498 14499 16:08 CHECK DATE 04/12/94 04/14/94 04/14/94 04/14/94 04/14/94 04/14/94 04/14/94 04/14/94 04/14/94 04/14/94 04/14/94 04/14/94 04/14/94 04/14/94 04/14/94 04/14/94 04/14/94 04/14/94 04/14/94 04/14/94 04/14/94 04/14/94 04/14/94 04/14/94 04/14/94 04/14/94 04/14/94 04/14/94 04/14/94 04/14/94 04/14/94 04/14/94 04/14/94 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NLINBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER 000128 CAL'SURANCE ASSOCIATES, DEBIT ENDORSEMENT PREMI 000105 AEI SECURITY, INC. ALARM SYSTEM/CASHIER 000408 AGRICREDIT ACCEPTANCE C TRACTOR LEASE/APRIL 250-1~0-129-5804 ~40-1~-~-5242 190-180-999-52~9 000680 ANS-TMS RESTORE POSTAGE 001-100-~q~-5230 000680 ANS-TMS RESTORE POSTAGE 001-110-~-5250 000680 AMS-TMS RESTORE POSTAGE 001-120-~-52~0 000680 ANS-TMS RESTORE POSTAGE 001-140-~-5250 000680 ANS-TMS RESTORE POSTAGE 001-150-~9-5230 000680 AMS-TMS RESTORE POSTAGE 001-161-~-5230 000680 ANS-TMS RESTORE POSTAGE 001-1~0 000680 ANS-TMS RESTORE POSTAGE '001-16~-~-52~0 000680 ANS-TMS RESTORE POSTAGE 190-180-9~9-5Z$0 000680 ANS-TMS RESTORE POSTAGE 320-199-999-5Z~0 000474 ARBOR-PRO TREE SERVICE REMOVE TREE 0013~3 ARROWHEAJ) WATER WATER CHG. 001323 ARRONHEAD WATER WATER/SC 0001~5 AS{ON HASLER NAILING SY METER RENTAL 000195 ASCON HASLER NAILING SY METER RENTAL 000676 AUTOMOTIVE SPECIALTIES INSTALL TRAILER HITCH REIMB SUPPLIES FLOAT 001388 BERG, DONALD 000638 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT 0 FEES COLLECTED 000638 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT 0 FEES COLLECTED 000638 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT 0 FEES COLLECTED 000950 CALIFORNIAN - DISPLAY 000127 CALIFORNIAN - LEGAL 100-164-~-5402 540-1~-~-5240 190-181-999-5240 330-1~-~9-5239 330-199-999-5239 100-1~4-~-5215 190-183-~-5370 001-22~0 001-2280 001-162-4229 BUILDING TECH 03/20 001-150-~-5254 PUBLIC HEARINGS 000365 CASSIERE, KATHLEEN JAZZ TK REFUND 000429 CHESHER, RUTH 000137 CHEVRON U.S.A. INC. 000137 CHEVRON U.S.A. INC. 001193 COMP USA, INC. 001-161-999-5256 190-183-4992 RE]MB. SUPPLIES 190-183-999-5370 789-819-697-2 GAS CARD 001-170-~-5262 789-819-697-2 GAS CARD 190-180-~-5263 COMPUTER SOFTWARE & SUP 320-1~-~-5221 001275 CONPUSERV, INC. USAGE CHARGE 320-1~-~-5228 001014 COUNTRY SIGNS & DESIGNS 001387 CRC FOUNDATION CITY SEAL MONUMENT 210-190-131-5804 GOLD NUGGETT SUBMITTAL 250-1~0-129-5804 ITEM AROUNT 1,391.00 85.00 846.02 13.22 ' 82.76 109.10 372.56 2~1.41 370.33 81.03 219.8~ 261.82 6.84 250.00 67.88 38.50 7.50 242.25 140,82 53.04 3,336.43 212.92 177.47- 15.84 10.45 21.00 58.68 44.04 8.68 212.74 24.63 500.00 CHECK AIqOUNT 1,391.00 85.00 846.02 1,748.90 250.00 18 249.75 140.82 53.04 3,371.88 15.84 10.45 21.00 58.68 52.72 212.74 24.63 489.72 5J~O0 VC]~ CITY OF TENECULA 04/ 16:08 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR XTEM ACCOUNT NIJMBER DATE · NUI4BER RARE DESCRZPTIOR NUMBER ITEN ANOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 14500 04/14/94 000155 DAVLIN 14501 04/14/94 000946 DISCOUNT FEED & TACK 04105 CITY COUNCIL NTG 001-100-;-5250 INVOICE 449J7 001-170-;-5327 701.67 89.39 701.67 ' 89:39 '14502 04/14/94 001245 DISPOSAL CONTROL $ERVIC HAZ-NAT STORAGE 100-164-999-5430 861.33 861.33 14503 04/14/94 000161 EDEN SYSTEMS, INC. ACUCOBOL RUNTIRE; 2-8 U 320-199-999-5211 14504 04114194 000517 ENTENNANR-ROVZN & CO BADGE;' JEFFREY E. STORE 001-100-~M)-5220 14504 04/14/94 000517 ENTEliqANN-ROVIN & CO BADGE; RONALD H. RORERT 001-100-;-5220 14504 04/14/94 000517 ENTENNANN-ROVIN & CO 25; PRESIDENTS HALLETS 001-100-999-5220 14504 04/14/94 000517 ENTENNANN-ROVIN & CO FREIGHT 001-100-;-5220 14504 04/14/94 000517 ENTENNANN-ROVlN & CO T/J( 001-100-999-5220 577.00 61.20 61.20 62.00 4.70 13.51 577.00 202.61 14505 04/14/94 001002 14505 04/14/94 001002 14505 04/14/94 001002 14505 04/14/94 001002 14506 04/14/94 001389 14. 34/14194 0006~3 14508 04/14/94 000170 14508 04/14/94 000170 14508 04/14/94 000170 14508 04/14/94 000170 14508 04/14/94 000170 14508 04/14/94 000170 14508 04/14/94 000170 14508 04/14/94 000170 14508 04/14/94 000170 14508 04/14/94 000170 14508 04/14/94 000170 14508 04/14/94 000170 14508 04/14/94 000170 14509 04/14/94 000993 FIRST INTERSTATE BANK - FIRST INTERSTATE RANK - 'FIRST INTERSTATE BANK - FIRST INTERSTATE RANK - FLEET TOWING & STORAGE FORTHER HARDWARE FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY FRANKLIN QUEST COIqPAMY FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY FRANKLIN QUEST COHPANY FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY FRANKLIN QUEST COI4PANY FRANKLIN QUEST Ca4PANY FRANKLIN QUEST COHPANY FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY FRANKLIN QUEST CONPANY FRANKLIN QUEST COHPANY FREEDON COFFEE, INC. 5473666403910032 NJM HA 547366640~910040/PB 5473666403910081/RR 54736(kS403910~1/RR TOWING CHARGES MISC. SUPPLIES ADDRESS/PHONE .INDEX TAB ORE PAGE HONTHLY CALEND TOP-CUT TABS #4124 LINED PAGES PERSONAL COHMUNICATION PROJECT/TASK CALENDAR 1 CLOCK/CALCULATOR PAGEFI PAGEFINDER/RULER #10460 SHEET PROTECTOR ~IYeO CREDIT CARD SHEET PROTE FORtS FREIGHT TAX MISC. COFFEE SUPPLIES 001-140-999-5260 001-100-999-5258 001-100-999-5260 001-100-999-5258 190-180-999-5250 190-180-999-5212 190-180-999-5220 190--180-999-5220 190-180-999-5220 190-180-999-5220 190-180-999-5220 190-180-999-5220 190-180-999-5220 190-180-999-5220 190-180-999-5220 190-180-999-5220 190-180-999-5220 190-180-999-5220 190-180-999-5220 340-199-999-5250 42.94 1,450.84 18.84 113.70 35.00 194.30 4.95 4.95 3.95 8.25 2.75 1.25 19.95 1.50 .50 6.00 1.25 6.95 4.82 126.33 1,626.32 35.00 194.30 67.07 126.33 14510 04/14/94 000192 14510 04/14/94 000192 14510 04/14/94 000192 14510 04/14/94 000192 14510 04/14/94 000192 14511 04/14/94 000180 · 1451104/14/94 000180 14511 04/14/94 000180 14512 04/14/94 001355 GLOBAL COHPUTER SUPPLIE GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE GLO6AL COMPUTER SUPPL[E GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE GLO6AL COMPUTER SUPPLIE GRAYBAR ELECTRIC COI4PAN GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CONPAN GRAYBAR ELECTRIC.COHPAN GTE CALIFORNIA C2787 HP LJ lllsl TONER C~2 AVERY LABELS 2 5/ C92645 CLEANING WIPES FREIGHT TAX TROPEZ 900DLCORDLESS P FREIGHT TAX 03/28/94 320-199-999-5221 320-199-999-5221 320-199-999-5221 320-199-999-5221 320-199-999-5221 320-199-999-5221 320-199-999-5221 320-199-999-5221 320-199-999-5208 341.97 71.85 10.99 14.55 33.50 495.0O 7.25 38.37 350.00 472.86 540.62 350.00 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 0/./14/94 16:08 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCREPTZON NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK ANOUNT 14513 04/14/94 000184 GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPOR 909-699-8632 NARCH/APRI 320-199-999-5208 17.17 17.17 14514 04/14/94 000206 KIRKO'S OF RIVERSIDE, I MENOR]AL SERVICES BROCH 001-150-;-5222 14514 04/14/94 000206 KIRKO'S OF RIVERSIDE, I TAX 001-150-~-5222 14514 04/14/94 000206 KINKO'S OF RIVERSIDE, I STATIONERY SUPPLIES 001-16.3-~-5222 61.00 ).95 22.52 87.47 14515 04/14/94 KOONTZ, RICHARD TCSD REFUND/KOONTZ 190-185-4~2 15.00 15.00 14516 04/14/94 000214 LUNCH & STUFF CATERING JOINT COUNCIL/PLANNING 001-100-;-5260 100.00 100.00 14517 04/14/94 001142 PARKHAN & ASSOCIATES ENGINEERING SERVICES 1~0-180-;-5250 14517 04/14/94 001142 PARKHAN & ASSOCIATES GOOD PAY DISCOUNT 100-16A-999-5248 14517 04/14/94 001142 PARKHAN & ASSOCIATES HORSE TRAIL CROSSING 100-16A-999-52~8 401.06 21.25- 425.00 804.81 14518 04/14/94 000219 PARTIN 1-HOUR PHOTO PHOTO DEVELOPING 001-163-~-5250 14518 04/14/94 000219 PARTIN 1-HOUR PHOTO PHOTO DEVELOP/PW 001-163-~-5250 118.96 92.08 211.04 14519 06/14/94 000226 MICRO AGE COMPUTER CENT HP DESKJET 560C PR]NTER 320-1970 14519 04/14/94 000226 MICRO AGE COMPUTER CENT DESKJET COLOR INK CARTR 320-1~-~-5221 14519 04/14/94 000226 MICRO AGE COMPUTER CENT DESKJET BLACK INK CARTR 320-1~-;-5221 14519 04/14/94 000226 MICRO AGE COMPUTER CENT DESKJET GLOSSY PAPER (5 320-1~-;-5221 14519 04/14/94 000226 MICRO AGE COMPUTER CENT TAX 320-1970 14519' 04/14/94 000226 MICRO AGE COMPUTER CENT TAX 320-1~;~-;-5221 569.00 54.00 48.00 98.00 44.11 15.50 828.61 · 14520 04/14/94 000587 NUNOZ, PARIO N. JANITONIAL SERVICES 190-181-~-5250 200.00 200.00 14521 04/14/94 001248 PAPER DIRECT SPECIAL PAPER 190-183-999-5370 22.~5 22.~5 14522 04/14/94 000580 PHOTO MDRKS FILM/PRINTS/DEVELOPMENT 190-180-999-5301 31.41 31.41 14523 04/14/94 000253 POSTPASTER 92~62 EXPRESS PAIL 3/9 190-180-999-5730 14573 04/14/94 000253 POSTRASTER 922~62 EXPRESS PAIL 3/9 001-120-999-5730 14523 04/14/94 000253 POSTMASTER 92/~62 EXPRESS PAIL 3/9 001-163-999-5730 14523 04/14/94 000253 POSTMASTER 92~462 EXPRESS PAIL 3/9 001-140-999-5730 14523 04/14/94 000253 POSTRASTER 924462 EXPRESS RAIL 3/9 001-161-999-5730 23.90 37.85 9.95 33.85 13.95 119,50 14524 04/14/94 000516 PRENTICE HALL, INC. DICTIONARY 190-180-~-5228 37.61 37.61 14525 04/14/94 000254 PRESS-ENTERPRISE CONPAN JOB ANNOUNCEMENT 001-150-~-5254 14525 04/14/94 000254 PRESS-ENTERPRISE COIlPAN JOB ANNOUNCEMENT 001-150-~-5254 14525 04/14/94 000254 PRESS-ENTERPRISE CONPAN DISPLAY ADD TUESDAY 001-120-~-5254 14525 04/14/94 000254 PRESS-ENTERPRISE CONPAN DISPLAY ADD SUNDAY 001-120-~-5254 53.E 55.39 65.63 ~.~ 244.25 14526 04/14/94 000~2 RANONA TIRE, INC. REPAIRS 310-16~-;-5214 143.61 143.61 14527 04/14/94 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER 01-06-29610-0 SR CENTER 1~0-181-;'5240 14527 04/14/94 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER WATER CHARGES 190-180-999-5240 14527 04/14/94 000262 PANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER WATER CHARGES 193-180-999-5240 14527 04/14/94 000262 PANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER WATER CHARGES 1.9!-180-999-5240 14528 04/14/94 000426 RARCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL JANITON]AL SUPPLIES ~0-1~-~-5212 9.61 58~ .47 431.08 82.88 127.44 1,108.04 VOU/ CiTY OF TEMECULA 04/ 16:08 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUI~ER DATE NUI~R NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER 14528 04/14/94 000~26 RANCHO INDUSTRIAL $UPPL SR CENTER SUPPLIES 1~0-181-~-5212 14528 04/14/94 000426 RANCHO INDUSTRIAL $UPPL TC$1) JANITORIAL SUPPLIE 190-180-999-5212 14528 04/14/94 000426 RANCHO INDUSTRIAL $UPPL JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5212 ITEM AMOUNT 43.92 36.15 92.23 CHECK AqOUNT 299.74 14529 04114194 RENNIE, ROSE TCSO REFUND/RENNIE 190-183-4982 40.00 40.0D 14530 04/14/94 000281 SCHUNACHER AUTO SALE & CHEW S-10 EXT. CAB PlC 310-1910 12,70~.25 14530 04/14/94 000281 SCHUNACHER AUTO SALE & TAX 310-1910 98L97 14531 04/14/94 001122 SCOTCH PAINT CORPORATIO PAINT 100-164-999-5218 1453.104/14/94 001122 SCOTCH PAINT CORPORATIO PAINT 100-164-999-5218 48,~2 56.08 13,694.22 105.00 14532 04/14/94 000285 SIR SPEEDY ENVELOPES/TCSD NAILED N 190-180-999-5220 14532 04/14/94 000285 SIR SPEEDY TAX 1~0-180-~-5220 14533 04/14/94 00070/, SKS, INC./INLAND OIL FUEL 001-110-999-5263 14533 04/14/94 000704 SKS, INC./INLAND OIL FUEL 190-180-999-5263 14533 04/14/94 000704 SKS, INC./INLAND OIL FUEL 001~162-999-5263 14533 04/14/94 00070/, SKS, INC./INLAND OIL FUEL 100-164-999-5263 14r"" 04/14/94 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 03/04-04/04/94 190-180-999-5240 14. J4/14/94 000374 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 03107-04105194 191-180-999-5319 1455b 04/14/94 000374 .SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 03107-04105194 190-180-999-5240 14556 04/14/94 000374 SOUTHERN CAL]F EDISON 03/08-04/05 191-180-999-5319 14557 04/14/94 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED] 01/~1-02/28 191-180-999-5319 14557 04/14/94 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI 10/01/93-02/28/94 192-180-999-5319 14557 04/14/94 000537 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI .01/31-.02/28 191-180-999-5319 14558 04/14/94 000375 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TEL 909-202-4767 GT FEB 001-161-999-5208 586.25 45 .~ 64.06 125.85 42.70 492.29 1,449.01 30.55 4,104.82 37.08 3.~0- 8,016.62 10.06- 58.18 631 .~8 TZ4 .QO 5,621.52 8,002.66 58.18 14559.04/14/94 000291 SPEE DEE OIL CHANGE & T REPAIRS 310-164-999-5214 14560 04/14/94 00137Z STAR WAY PRODUCT]ORS SCXJND & LIGHTING FOR CR 190-183-999-5370 62.50 200.00 62.50 · 200.00 14561 04/14/94 000294 STATE COMPENSATION INS. MARCH 94 001'2370 4,486.22 1456104/14/94 000294 STATE COMPENSATION INS. MARCH 94 100-2370 2,671.35 14561 04/14/94 000294 STATE COMPENSATION INS. MARCH 94 190-2370 1,8/,0.89 14561 04/14/94 000294 STATE CONPENSATION INS. NARCH 94 191-2370 119.05 14561 04/14/94 000294 STATE CONPENSATION INS. NARCH 94 192-2370 4.14 1456104/14/94 000294 STATE COMPENSATION INS. NARCH 94 19~-2370 169./dl 1456104/14/94 000294 STATE CORPENSATION INS. NARCH 94 280-2370 61.01 1456104/14/94 000294 STATE CORPENSATION INS. NARCH 94 )00-2370 12.32 14561 04/14/94 00029~ STATE CONPENSATION INS. NARCH 94 320-2370 29.92 14561 04/14/94 000294 STATE CONPENSATION INS, NARCH 94 330-2370 13.46 1456104/14/94 000294 STATE CONPENSATIOR INS, NARCH 9~ ~40-2370 206.25 14561 04/14/94 000294 STATE COIeENSATION INS. NARCH 94 001-1182 197.91 1456104/14/94 000294 STATE COleENSATION INS. NARCH 94 001-1182 108.07 14562 04/14/94 001386 SYNANTEC CORPORATION SOFTWARE UPGRADE 320-199-999-5221 61.57 9,920.07 61.57 VOUCHRE2 04/14/94 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUNBER 14563 14563 14563 14563 14563 14563 14563 14563 145(~ 145&~ 1456~ 1456/, 145(>4 14564 14565 145(~ 14567 16:08 CHECK DATE 04/14/94 04/14/94 04/14/94 04/14/94 04/14/94 04/14/94 04/14/94 04/14/94 04114194 04114194 04114194 04114194 04114194 04114194 04/14/94 04/14/94 04/14/94 VENDOR NUHBER 000307 000307 000307 000307 000307 000307 000307 000307 000326 000326 000326 000326 000326 000326 001209 000345 VENDOR NAHE TEHEOULA TROPHY CO. TEHECULA TROPHY CO. TENECULA TROPHY CO. TENECULA TROPHY CO. TENECULA TROPHY CO. TENECULA TROPHY CO. TENECULA TROPHY CO. TENECULA TROPHY CO. UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE VAULT, THE 140LFORD, RUHL XEROX CORPORATION BILL[ CITY OF TENEOULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS [TEN DESCRIPTION P2~17 7)(9 TROPAR ENGRAV l NG TAX TROPHIES BRONZE PLAQUE TAX 6 KEYS/ATTACHED PINS TAX RENTAL & CLEANING UNIFORM RENTAL UNIFORH RENTAL UNIFORH RENTAL RENTAL & CLEANING RENTAL & CLEANING COURIER HOLFORD/REFUND NETER READING ACCOUNT NUNBER 001-17'0-999-5285 '001-170-999-5285 001-170-999-5285 190-182-999-5301 190-180-999-524~. 190-180-999-5244 001-100~999-5220 001-100-999-5220 190-180-999-5250 100-16~.-999-5243 100-16~-999-5243 190-180-999-5243 :~0-199-999-5250 340-199-999-5250 001-120-999-5250 001-2660 330-199-999-5239 ]TEN AHOUNT 36.00 13.80 3.86 25.86 508.00 39,37 99.00 7.68 43.50 64.49 23.00 75.35 39,75 ~..50 40.00 175.00 980.05 CH~ ANOUNT 753.57 280.59 40,00 175,00 TOTAL CHECKS 61,075,79 16:44 C[TY OF TENECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGZSTER FOR ALL PER[0O$ PAGE FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 100 GAS TAX FUND 190 COI, I, IJNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 210 CAPITAL ]IqPROVENENT PROJ FUND 250 CAPITAL PROJECTS - TCSD 280 REDEVELOPNENT AGENCY - C]P 300 INSURANCE FUND 320 INFORNATION $YSTENS TOTAL ANOUNT 416,866.05 94,187.96 12,372.32 1,135.00 8,473.00 58,295.02 81,997.76 3,766.95 18,5~3.96 5,390.56 701,028.58 VOUCHRE2 4/94 CITY OF TENECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK NUNBER CHECK DATE VENDOR NUtIER VENDOR ITEN ACCOUNT ITEN CHECK NANE DESCRIPTION NIJIEER ANOUNT ANOUHT 14571 14572 14572 14572 14572 14572 14572 · 1457'5 14573 14573 14574 14574 14574 14574 14574 14574 14574 14574 14575 14576 14577 14577 14577 14577 14577 14577' 14578 14578 14578 14578 14578 14578 14578 14578 14579 14579 14580 14580 14580 14580 14580 14580 04126194 04126194 04/26/94 04126/94 04126194 04126194 04126194 04/26/94 04/26/94 04/26/94 04/26/94 04/26/94 04/26/94 04/26/94 04/26/94 04/26/W. 04/26/94 04/26/94 04/26/94 0~/26/94 04/26/94 04/26/94 04/26/94 04/26/94 04/26/94 04/26/94 04/26/94 04/26/94 04/26/94 04/26/94 04/26/94 04/26/94 04/26/94 04/26/94 04/26/94 04/26/94 04126194 04126194 04126194 04126194 04126194 04126/94 000921 000101 000101 000101 000101 000101 000101 001294 001294 001294 000123 000123 000123 000123 000123 000123 000123 000123 001191 000126 000131 000131 000131 000131 000131 000131 000135 000135 000135 000135 000135 000135 000135 000135 000~79 000979 001056 001056 001056 001056 001056 001056 AETNA CASUALTY AND SURE APPLE ONE APPLE ONE APPLE ORE APPLE ONE APPLE ONE APPLE ONE BES14[CK, STEVE BESglCX, STEVE BESHICK, STEVE BURICE WILLIANS & SOREMS BURKE WILLIANS & SORENS BURKE WILLIANS & SORENS BURKE WILLIANS & SORENS BURKE WILLIANS & SORENS BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENS BURKE WILLIAM$ & $OREN$ BURKE WILLIAM$ & SORENS C & C GRADING & PAVING CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA CARL WARREN & CO., INC. CARL WARREN & CO., INC. CARL WARREN & CO., INC. CARL WARREN & CO., INC. CARL WARREN & CO., INC. CARL WARREN & CO., INC. CENTRAL CITIES SiGN SER CENTRAL CITIES SiGN SER CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER DEL RIO ENTERPRISE DEL RIO ENTERPRISE EXCEL LANDSCAPE EXCEL LANDSCAPE EXCEL LANDSCAPE EXCEL LANDSCAPE EXCEL LANDSCAPE EXCEL LANDSCAPE FIRE & INLAND NARINE 300-19~-~9~-5204 TENP/gE 3/12/94 FINANCE TEMP/ME 3/12/94 CLERK TENP/VE 3/23/94 CLERK TENP/WE 3/23/94 TENP/~E 3/26/94 TENP/~E 3/26/94 CLERK 280-1~-~ja~-5250 001-120-~9-5118 001-120-99~-5118 280-1f9-~-5250 280-199-999-5250 001-120-~-5118 PROJECT ENGINEER SERVIC gORKERS' CONP. FOR NARC IXtKERS CONP FEB. 94 100-164-999-5248 001-1182 001-1182 SERVICES THROUGH 1/31/9 190-180-999-5246 SERVICES THROUGH 1/31/9 300-199-999-5207 SERVICES THROUGH 1/31/9 001-130-999-5246 SERVICES THROUGH 1/31/9 001-1280 SERVICES THROUGH 2/28/9 280-199-999-5246 RETAINER SERVICES 001-130-999-5246 RETAINER BILLED WRONG 001-130-999-5246 SERVICES THROUGH 02/28/001-130-999-5246 k~3RK ORDER 93-94-92 100-164-99~-5402 LANDSCAPE INPROVENENTS/191-180-999-5415 PHILIPPA RIHA 05-17-~J JANES H. KENNINGTN 01-1 CAROL NOOAFFARE 08-14-9 NUT[ZGER/BEDFORD 08'02- RICHARD COLENAN 02-07-9 RANCHO CONHERCE 01-16- 300-1~-~-5205 300-1~9-9~-5205 300-1~-~9-5205 300-199-999-5205 300-1~-~-5205 300-1~-~-5205 STREET SIGNS STREET NANE SIGNS 10' QUICK-PUNCH POST 12' QUICK-PUNCH POST TAX NISC, HARDWARE SIGN ORDER SIGN ORDER 100-164-~9~-5244 100-164-99~-52/~ 100-164-999-5244 100-164-~-52z~4 100-164-999-522~. 100-164-9~-52U, 100-164-~-5244 100-164-~9-522~. I)RK ORDER ~93-94-93 EXTRAS 100-164-999-5401 100-164-~99-5401 LANDSCAPE INPROVENENTS: LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS: 2" NAINLINE REPAIR LARDSCAPE [NPROVENENT LABOR TO PREP AND REPLA DUCHESN]A - 15 ON EACH 193-180-999-5415 lrJ-180-~-5415 193-180-g99-5415 lf3-180-~-5415 193-180-999-5415 193-180-~-5415 7,059.30 103.20 1~.48 361.20 103.20 103.20 361.20 2,566.50 108.07- 62.23- 363.30 10,377.28 29,825.24 1,823.30 3,457.35 4,080.00 f30.00- 6,088.14 2,921.00 1,135.00 226.50 22.50 302.13 174.00 18&.50 195.73 77.58 64.65 1,917.50 950.00 222.23 96.98 212.81 129.30 9,088.00 800.00 3,320.00 3,750.00 91.00 27.00 280.00 150.00 7,059.30 1,176.48 2,396.20 55 ~'.1 2,921.00 1,135.00 1,107.38 3,671.05 9,888.00 04, · 16:66 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUNBER 16580 0~126196 001056 16580 0/,126194 001056 16580 04126/94 001056 14580 04/26/96 001056 14581 04/26/96 000178 14581 04/26/96 000178 16581 04/26/96 000178 16581 04/26/94 000178 16581 06/26/94 000178 14581 04/26/94 000178 16581 04/26/94 000178 14581 04/26/94 000178 14581 04/26/96 000178 16581 04/26/96 000178 14581 0/,/26/96 000178 16581 04/26/96 000178 16581 04/26/94 000178 16581 04/26/94 000178 14581 04/26/94 000178 lg''''~ 04/26/96 000178 14~ 06/26/96 000178 14581 04/26/96 000178 14582 04/26/94 000756 14582 04/26/94 000756 1458~ 04/26/94 000202 16583 04/26/94 000202 14584 04/26/96 000688 14586-- 04/26/96 000688 14584 04/26/96 000688 16585 04126/96 000217 14586 04/26/94 001207 14586 04/26/94 001207 16587 04126196 000224 16588 04/26/96 001339 16588 04/26/96 001339 16588 04/26/94 001339 14588 06/26/96 001339 16588 04/26/94 001339 14588 04/26/96 001339 14588 04/26/96 001339 16588 04/26/96 001339 14588 04/26/94 001339 14588 04/26/94 001339 VENDOR NN4E EXCEL LANDSCAPE EXCEL LANDSCAPE EXCEL LANDSCAPE EXCEL LANDSCAPE GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO IPS SERVICES, INC. IPS SERVICES, INC. J.F. DAVIDSON ASSOCIATE J.F. DAVIDSON ASSOCIATE LO-FAT CYCLES LO-FAT CYCLES LO-FAT CYCLES NARGARITA OFFICIALS ASS NARTIN J. JASKA, INC. HARTIN J. JASKA, INC. NELAD & ASSOC/ATES NORTON INTERNATIONAL, B NORTON INTERNATIONAL, B NORTON INTERNATIONAL, B NORTON INTERNATIONAL, 8 NORTON INTERNATIONAL, B NORTON INTERNATIONAL, B NORTON INTERNATIONAL, B NORTON INTERNATZONAL, B NORTON INTERNATIONAL, B NORTON INTERNATIONAL, B CITY OF TEMECIJLA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FON ALL PERZCOS ]TEN DESCRIPTION 5 GAL. RAPHIOLEPI$ TO R 5 GAL. PHOTINIA/VIA LA BACCHARIS/VIA LAVIDA PHOSTOXIN FOR VERTEBRAT 16BIT IOBASET ETHERNET PS/2-20(N IKNER SUPPLY FREIGHT TAX ANN SINN NENORY CHIP SE FREIGHT TAX 6860X-66 VISA WBIq PJUq TAX PC POKIER SUPPLY FOR FUL MICROSOFT NOUSE SERIAL FREIGHT FREIGHT TAX TAX BUS leOUSE FREIGHT TAX PUJOL & 1ST STREET RETENTION DESIGN SERVICE/RANCHO C DESILTATION LAKE PROJEC REPA/R]NG & REFURBISHIN TAX TAX ON LABOR/BILL INCOR OFFICIALS PALA PARK RETENTION PLAN CHECKS NARCH 94 5 GALS IJHZTE PAINT 2656 5 GALS YELLCN PAINT 265 5 GALS RED PAINT 257449 5 GALS BLUE PAINT 1865A 5 GALS STENCIL GUARD 56 100 LBS, #1 BEADS 19004 TAX 60 PALLS PAINT 5 GALS BLACK PAINT ?378 TAX ACCOUNT NUIIER 193-180-999-5615 193-180-999-5615 193-180-999-5615 193-180-999-5615 320-199-999-5221 320-199-~-5221 320-199-~9~-5221 320-199-999-5221 320-199-999-5221 320-199-999-5221 320-199-999-5221 320-1970 320-1970 320-199-~9~-5215 320-199-;-5221 320-199-999-5215 320-199-999-5221 320-199-999-5215 320-199-999-5221 320-199-;-5221 320-199-999-5221 320-199-~99-5221 210-165-628-5804 210-2035 210-190-137-5802 001-163-~-5250 GO1-170-999-5326 001-170-999-5326 001-170-999-5326 199-183-;~9-5380 210-1990 210-Z035 001-162-999-52~8 100-164-99~-5218 100-164-999-5218 100-164-999-5218 100-164-999-5218 100-1~4-999~5218 100-164-999-5218 100-164-999-5218 100-164-999-5218 100-164-999-5218 100-164-~99-5218 ITEN 200.00 100.00 75.00 ~80. O0 330;00 185.00 15.GO 39.91 640.00 5.00 49.60 3,470.00 268.92 90.00 210.00 1.50 3.50 6.98 16.27 50.00 5.00 3.88 12,398.16 1,239.81- 3,198.69 5,000.00 2,113.00 1(:3.76 46.50- 47, 153.GO 4,715.00' 4,839.92 510.00 1,650.GO 2,300.00 80.GO 350.00 31.00 381.38 1,198.00 96.50 PAGE 2 CHEC~ ANOUNT 8,473.0O 5,398.56 11,158.33 8,198.69 2,~0.26 2,783.00 62,438.00 4,839.92 6,686.43 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEIECULA 04/14/94 16:44 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR iTEM ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE NUNBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER iTEM AMOUNT CHECK AH(XJNT 14589 04126/94 000230 NUNI FINANCIAL SERVICES ASSESSIlENT ADMIN. 190-180-999-5370 14590 04/26/94 001007 NPG CORP. SLLIRRY SEALCOAT/STRIPE 190-180-999-5212 16590 0~/26/94 001007 NPG CORP. ASPHALT REPAIR 190-180-999-5212 14590 04/26/94 001007 NPG CORP. gORK ORDER t~3-94-88 100-164-999-5402 14590 04/26/94 001007 NPG CORP. PUJOL ST DRAINAGE REPAI 100-164-999-5402 14590 04/26/94 001007 NPG CORP. R&R ASPHALT ON ROADIJAY 100-164-999-5402 14590 04/26/94 001007 NPG CORP. MC)RKORDER #93-9~-97 100-164-999-5402 1,537.37 4,274.00 1,392.00 936.00 2,629.00 4,213.08 3,694.00 1,537.37 17,138.08 14591 04/26/94 000240 ORANGE COUNTY STRIPING NISC M)RK ON RANCHO VIS 100-164-999-5410 16591 04/26/94 000240 ORANGE COUNTY STRIPING INVOICED OVER PO 100-164-999-5410 12,381.97 2,786.13- 9,595.84 14592 04/26/94 000247 PESTIqASTER gEED CONTROL; 100-164-999-5402 14593 04/26/94 000251 PLANNING CENTER, INC. T NOV. 1-30 001-161-999-5248 14593 04/26/94 000251 PLANNING CENTER, [NC. T GENERAL PLAN CONTRACT 001-161-999-52/.8 14593 04/26/94 000251 PLANNING CENTER, [HC. T FEB. 1-28 001-161-999-5248 14593 04/26/94 000251 PLANNING CENTER, [NC. T FEB. 1-28 001-161-999-52/,8 14594 04/26/94 001046 REXON, FREEDMAN, KLEPET MARCH 94 PROF SERVICES 001-130-999-5247 14595 04/26/94 001365 RIVERSIDE COUNTY DEPART PLAN CHECK FEES 001-2210 i,350.82 1,000.00 1,365.00 4,312.64 2,493.21 2,952.00 1,350.82 9,170.85 2,9~0 1,~ ./5 14596 04/26/94 000678 RIVERSIDE COUNTY HEALTH ANIMAL CONTROL FEB 94 001-172-999-5255 5,434.64 5,43~.64 14597 04/26/94 000406 14597 04/26/94 000406 14597 04/26/94 000406 14597 04/26/94 000406 14597 04/26/94 000406 14597 04/26/94 000406 14597 04/26/94 000406 14597 04/26/94 000406 14597 04/26/94 000406 14597 04/26/94 000406 14597 04/26/94 000406 14597 04/26/94 000406 14597 04/26/94 000406 14597 04/26/94 000406 14597 04/26/94 000406 14597 04/26/94 000406 14597 0~/26/94 000406 14597 04/26/94 000406 14597 04/26/94 000406 14597 04/26/94 000406 14597 04/26/94 000406 14598 04/26/94 000270 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIF RJM DESIGN GROUP, INC. POLICE SERVICE JAN 199~ 001-170-999'5288 POLICE SERVICE JAN 1994 001-170-999-5299 POLICE SERVICE JAN 1994 001-170-999-5298 POLICE SERVICE JAN 199~ 001-170-999-5294 POLICE SERVICE JAN 1994 001-170-999-5290 POLICE SERVICE JAN 1994 001-170-999-5291 POLICE SERVICE JAN 1994 001-1230 POLICE SERVICE JAN 1994 001-170-999-5281 POLICE SERVICE JAN 1994 POLICE SERVICE JAN 1994 RATE ADJUSTMENT FY 93-9 RATE ADJUSTMENT FY 93-9 RATE ADJUSTMENT FY 93-9 RATE ADJUSTMENT FY 93-9 RATE ADJUSTMENT FY 93-9 RATE ADJUSTMENT FY 93-9 RATE ADJUSTMENT FY 93-9 RATE ADJUSTMENT FY 93-9 RATE ADJUSTMENT FY 93-9 RATE ADJUSTMENT FY 93"9 OVER BILLED RATE ADJUST 001-170-999-5282 001-170-999-5262 001-170-999-5288 001-170-999-5299 001-170-999-5298 001-170-999-5294 001-170-999-5290 001-170-999-5282 001-170-999-5281 001 - 170-999-5291 O01 - 1230 001 - 170-999-5262 001-170-999-5299 RANCHO CA SPORTS PARK 250-190-129-5802 207,678.12 19,027.42 21,560.08 3,636.64 6,513.76 5,921.60 5,921.60 18,809.07 2,798.32 14,836.65 73,416.26 4,268.19 2,314.58 1,130.94 461.76 458.50 5,566.47 278.07 278 · 07 31.74' 2,183.49' 2,630.44 3/.2,658.87 2,630.4~ 14599 04/26/94 001097 ROADLINE PRODUCTS, INC, PURCHASE OF STENCIL TRU 100-164-999-5608 44,816.24 14599 04/26/94 001097 ROADLINE PRODUCTS, INC. CALTRANS METRIC PAINT S 100-164-999-5242 1,132.25 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 145~ 14600 16601 16601 16601 14602 14603 14603 14603 14603 16:~4 CITY OF TENEOULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOB ALL PERIODS CHECK VENDOB VENDOB ITEM ACCOUNT DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRZPTION NUMBER 0~/26/9~ 0~/26/94 0~/26/96 04/26/94 04/26/94 04/26/94 001097 000271 000929 000929 0009Z9 000978 001342 00134,2 001342 001342 RON)LINE PRODUCTS, INC. TAX ROBERT BEIN, t~ FROST & T.B. PENICK & SONS, INC T.B. PENICK & SONS, T.B. PENICK & SONS, INC TRAilHA INTERVENTION PRO MAXIE SANITARY SIJPPLY WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY gAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY gAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 04/26/94 0~/26/9~ 04/26/94 04/26/96 100-164-999-5242 FEES FOB JANUARY 1994. 210-165-606-5802 CONTRACT CHARGE FOB CRC 250-190-129-5804 CONSTRUCTION OF THE CRC 250-190-129-5804 CONSTRUCTION FOB THE CR 250-2035 3RD QTR USER FEE 001-171-999-5274 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES CRC CRC HAlfiT SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 ITEM AMOUNT 87.75 1,500.00 3,030.91 85,155.00 8,818.59- 1,312.50 1,000,00 7"~2.81 13.41 276.43 PAGE 4 CHECK AMOUNT ~6,036.24 1,500.00 79,367.32 1,312.50 2,022.65 TOTAL CHECKS 701,028.58 ITEM NO. 4 CTTY Y~NAGER ~ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Mary Jane McLarney, Finance Officer DATE: April 26, 1994 SUBJECT: City Treasurer's Statement of Investment Policy RECOMMENDATION: That the. City Council adopt 'the Treasurer's Statement of Investment Policy as proposed by Staff which provides safety, iiquidity and yield for City funds. DISCUSSION: The California legislature has passed legislation imposing a State- mandated local program requiring the treasurer or chief fiscal officer to render an annual statement of investment policy to the legislative body of the local agency and to render a monthly report containing specified information regarding investments and deposits to the chief executive officer and the legislative body of the local agency. The Treasurer's Statement of Investment Policy, as presented herein, is in conformity with the State requirements and guidelines established by the California Municipal Treasurer's Association, the California Society of Municipal Treasurer's Association, and the California Society of Municipal Finance Officers. The monthly investment report is placed on the agenda each month. The legislated authority of the Fund is included in Sections 53601,53635, 53638, 53646, 53652, and 53653 of the Government Code. Enclosed are copies of the statutes which determine the maximum parameters of the Investment Fund. FISCAL IMPACT: ATTACHMENTS: None Proposed Investment Policy, Government Code Sections 53601, 53635, 53638, 53646, 53652 and 53653 CITY OF TEMECULA INVESTMENT POLICY INTRODUCTION The investment policies and practices of the City of Temecula are based upon State law and prudent money management. The primary goals of these policies are: 1. To protect the principal monies entrusted to this office. To provide sufficient liquidity to meet normal operating and unexpected expenditures. To assure compliance with all Federal, State, and Local laws governing the investment of monies under the control of the City Treasurer. To generate a maximum amount of investment income within the parameters of prudent risk management and consistent with the above policies. The monies entrusted to the City Treasurer (referred to as the "Fund" throughout the remainder of this document) will be invested, administered, and reported in a timely and prudent manner. The City Treasurer and staff will observe, review, and react to changing conditions that effect the fund. The authority to execute investment transactions that will effect the Fund will be limited to: City Manager or Assistant City Manager or City Clerk and Finance Officer acting together The above Finance Officer will meet on a regular basis with the City Manager to discuss the current market conditions, future trends, and to plan investment strategy to meetthe City's fiscal objectives. The policy stated below will also address risk management because it is such an integral part of the investment policy. To concentrate only on maximizing return would be dangerous; therefore, policy issues will be directed to: 1. Limiting the Fund's exposure to each. issue and issuer. of debt; and Determining a minimum credit requirement that firms must have in order to hold City money. II CITY OF TEMECULA INVESTMENT POLICY SCOPE In accordance with Ordinance No. 90-2 of the City Council of the City of Temecula and as prescribed by Section 41000 through 41007 of the Government Code of the State, the City Treasurer is responsible for investing the unexpended cash in the City Treasury. OBJECTIVES A. Safetv of Princi oal Safety of principal is the foremost objective of the City of Temecula. Each investment transaction shall seek to ensure that capital losses are avoided, whether from securities default, broker-dealer default, or erosion of market value. The City shall seek to preserve principal by mitigating the two types of risk: credit risk and market risk. Credit Risk. Credit risk, defined as the risk of loss due to failure of the issuer of a security, shall be mitigated by investing only with issuers whose financial strength and reputation can be verified to be the highest as rated by nationally known rating agencies (see Section VI for detailed limitations on credit risk), and by diversifying the investment portfolio so that the failure of any one issuer would not unduly harm the City's cash flow. Market Risk. Market risk, the risk of the market value fluctuations due to overall changes in the general level of interest rates, shall be mitigated by (a) structuring the portfolio so that securities mature earlier ,than or concurrent with the timing of major cash outflows, thus eliminating the need to sell securities prior to their maturity; (b) prohibiting the use of leverage and margin accounts; and (c) prohibiting the taking of short positions--that is, selling securities which the City does not own. It is explicitly recognized herein, however, that in a diversified portfolio, occasional measured loses are inevitable, and must be considered within the context of the overall investment return. B. Return on Investment The City's investment portfolio shall be designed to attain a market-average rate of return through economic cycles. The market-average rate of return is defined as the average return on three-month U.S. Treasury bills. Whenever possible, and consistent with risk limitations, as defined herein, and prudent investment principles, the Treasurer shall seek to augment returns above the market average rate of return. 2 III IV V VI CITY OF TEMECULA INVESTMENT POLICY SAFEKEEPING OF SECURITIES To protect against potential losses by collapse of individual securities dealers, all securities owned by the City, including collateral on repurchase agreements, shall be held in safekeeping by a third party bank trust department, acting as agent for the City under the terms of a custody agreement executed by the bank and by the City. All securities will be received and delivered using standard delivery versus payment procedures, i.e., the City's safekeeping agent will only release payment for a security after the security has been properly delivered. REPORTING Under provisions of Section 53646 of the California Government Code (attached), the City Treasurer shall render · monthly report to the City Manager and City Council showing the type of investment, issuing institution, selling institution, date of maturity, amount of deposit, current market value for all securities with a maturity of more that 12 months, return on the City's investment portfolio expressed as an annual percentage rate, yield to maturity, cash flow information demonstrating that the City can meet its upcoming financial obligations, and such data as may be required by the City Council. The report shall also state its relationship to this statement of investment policy, as directed under the Code. The treasurer shall annually submit an investment report and a recommended updated Investment Policy to be reviewed and approved by Council. QUALIFIED DEALERS The City shall transact investments only with banks, savings and loans, investment security dealers and the State of California Local Agency Investment Fund. The dealers must be primary dealers regularly reporting to the New York Federal Reserve Bank. Exceptions to this rule will be made only after thorough research and documented confirmation of financial strength and reputation and after approval by the C!ty Council. Investment staff shall investigate dealers who wish to do business with the City in order to determine if they are adequately capitalized, make markets in securities appropriate to the City's needs, and are recommended by managers of portfolios like the City's. The City shall at least annually send a copy of the current investment policy to all dealers approved to do business with the City. Confirmation of receipt of this policy shall be considered as evidence that the dealer understands the City's investment policies, and intends to show the City only appropriate investments. · AUTHORIZED INVESTMENTS Generally, investments shall be made in the context of the "prudent investor" rule, which states that: "Investments shall be made with judgment and care, under circumstances then prevailing, which persons of prudence, discretion, 3 CITY OF TEMECULA INVESTMENT POLICY and intelligence exercise in the management of their own affairs, not for speculation, but for investment, considering the probable safety of their capital as well as the probable income to be derived." The City is further governed by the California Government Code, Sections 53600 et seq (attached. Within the context of these limitations, the following investments are authorized, as further limited herein: United States Treasury Bills. Bonds. and Notes. or those for which the full faith and credit of the United States are oledged for oavment of orincio~l and interest. There is no limitation as to the percentage of the portfolio which can be invested in this category. Maturity is not to exceed the projected dates of the City's cash needs or five years, whichever is less. ObliQations issued by the Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA). the Federal Farm Credit Bank System (FFCB|. the Federal Home Loan Bank Board (FHLB). and the Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA). Although there is no percentage limitation on the dollar amount that can be invested in these issues, the "prudent investor" rule shall apply for a single agency name. Maturity is not to exceed the projected dates of the City's cash needs or five years, whichever is tess. Bills of exchanQe or time drafts drawn on and acceoted by a commercial bank. otherwise known as banker's acceotances. Banker's acceptances purchased may not exceed 270 days to maturity or 40% of the market value of the portfolio. No more than 10% of the market value of the portfolio may be invested in banker'$ acceptances issued by any one bank. Commercial oaoer ranked "P1" by Moodv's Investor Services and "A1 +" by Standard and Poor's. and issued by a domestic corooration havino assets in excess of $500.000.000 and havino an "A" or better ratino on its long-term debentures as orovided by Moodv's or Standard and Poor's. Purchases of eligible commercial paper may not exceed 15% of the market value of the portfolio.. No more than 10% of the market value of the portfolio may be invested in commercial paper issued by any one corporation. The City may invest in no more than 10% of a single corporation. The City may invest in no more than 10% of a single corporation's commercial paper. Maturity is not to exceed 180 days. Negotiable certificates of deoosit issued by nationally or state-chartered bank or a state or federal savings and loan association. Negotiable certificates of deposit (NCDs) differ from other certificates of deposit by their deposit liquidity, They are issued against funds deposited for specified periods of time and earn specified or variable rates of interest. NCDs are traded actively in secondary markets. When feasible, an independent trading service will be used as part of the evaluation process. If a rating service is used, the financial institution should maintain a rating equivalent to Keefe Bank Watch Service of "A/B" or better. To be .eligible for purchase by the City, the NCD must be issued by: 4 CITY OF TEMECULA INVESTMENT POLICY A California bank rated "A/B" or better by the rating service of Keefe, Bruyette and Woods, (Keefe) or equivalent); A major national or regional bank outside of California rated "B" or better by Keefe, (or equivalent); A domestic branch of foreign bank ("Yankee") rated I for country rating, II or better for peer-group rating, and II or better for dollar access by Keefe; or A savings and loan association operating in California rated "A/B" or better by Keefe. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section II-A-2 of this policy, the maturity of bank NCDs shall not exceed two years; the maturity of savings and loan association NCDs shall not exceed two years. Transactions in NCDs shall not collectively exceed 30% of the total portfolio in effect immediately after any such. investment is made. Reourchase Agreements. The City may invest in repurchase agreements with banks and dealers with which the City has entered into a master repurchase agreement which specifies terms and conditions of repurchase agreements. Transactions shall be limited to the primary dealers and the top banking institutions according to the rating agency based on liquidity, profitability, and financial strength. The maturity of repurchase agreements shall not exceed 30 days. The market value of securities used as collateral for repurchase agreements shall be monitored daily by the investment staff and will not be allowed to fall below 100% of the value of the repurchase agreement plus the value of collateral in excess of the value of the repurchase agreement (haircut)· In order to conform with provisions of the Federal Bankruptcy Code which provide for the liquidation of securities held as collateral for repurchase agreements, the only securities acceptable as collateral shall be certificates of deposit, eligible bankers' acceptances, or securities that are direct obligations of, or that are fully guaranteed as to principal and interest by, the United States or any agency of the United States. No more than 50% of the portfolio may be invested in repurchase agreements, and a "perfected security interest" shall always be maintained in the securities subject to a repurchase agreement. Local Aaencv Investment Fund. The City may invest in the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) established by the State Treasurer for the benefit of local agencies up to the maximum permitted by State law. Time Deoosits. The City may invest in non-negotiable time deposits collateralized in accordance with the California Government Code (attached), in those banks and savings and loan associations which meet the requirements 5 VII VIII IX CITY OF TEMECULA INVESTMENT POLICY for investment in negotiable certificates of deposit. Since time deposits are not liquid, no more than 15% of the portfolio may be invested in this category. The issuer firm should have been in existence for at least five years. The City may waive the first 100,000 of collateral security for such deposits if the institution is insured pursuant to federal law. In order to security the uninsured portions of such deposits, an institution shall maintain at least 10% in excess of the total amount deposited. Real estate mortgages may not be accepted as collateral. The maximum term for deposits shall be one year. In general, the issuer must have a minimum 6% net worth to assets ratio or the minimum ratio established by the Comptroller of the Currency. The issuer's operation must have been profitable during their last reporting period. I. Monev Market Funds. Investing solely in U.S. treasuries, obligations of the U.S. Treasury, and repurchase agreements relating to such treasury obligations. To be eligible, these companies must have an investment advisor with not less than five years experience and that is registered with the SEC, has the highest ranking available as evaluated by a nationally recognized rating service, and with assets in excess of $500 million. J. Ineliaible Investments. Investments not described herein, including, but not limited to, reverse repurchase agreements, mutual funds, zero coupon bonds, mortgage backed securities, common stocks and corporate notes and bonds are prohibited from use in this portfolio. SWAPPING OF SECURITIES A swap is the movement from one security to another and may be done for a variety of reasons, such as to increase yield, lengthen or shorten maturities, to take a profit, or to increase investment quality. The purchase transaction and the sale transaction must each be recorded separately and any losses or gains on the sale must be recorded. PORTFOLIO ADJUSTMENTS Should an investment percentage-of-portfolio limitation be exceeded due to an incident such as fluctuation in portfolio size, the affected securities may be held to maturity to avoid losses. When no loss is indicated, the Treasurer shall consider reconstructing the portfolio basing his decision, in part, on the expected length of time the portfolio will be unbalanced. POLICY REVIEW This investment policy shall be reviewed at least annually to insure its consistency with the overall objectives of preservation of principal, liquidity, and return, and its relevance to current law and financial and economic trends. The City Council shall be responsible for maintaining guidance over this investment policy to insure that the City can adapt readily to changing market conditions, and shall approve any modification to the investment policy prior to implementation. 6 CITY OF TEMECULA · INVESTMENT POLICY STATELAW The legislated authority of the Fund is covered in Sections 53601,53635, 53638, 53646, 53652 and 53653 of the Government Code. Enclosed are copies of the statutes which determine'the maximum parameters of the Fund. It is the policy of the City Treasurer to comply with the State laws governing the Fund. 7 ITEM 5 APPROVAT. , CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Manager/City Council Mary Jane McLarney, Finance Officer February 8, 1994 Out-of-State Travel Plans RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council authorize certain out-of-state travel plans. DISCUSSION: outlined below: The following council and staff have requested out-of-state travel as Mayor Pro Tem& City Manager Las Vegas, NV Intemational Council of Shopping Centers May 16,19 Amount: $1800 (registration, transportation, lodging) Justification: This conference is the largest gathering of shopping center professionals in the world. It hosts nationwide retailers and Temecula officials will be recruiting retailers to the City. Councilmember J. Sal Mufioz Chicago, IL Economic Development recruitment of retail tenant April 20 - 21 Amount: $1400 (transportation and lodging) Justification: This trip is to recruit a large retailer to Temecula; also to fulfill our part of the Kemper settlement. Director of Planning Denver, CO Successful Mgmt of June 9 - 10 Planning & Zoning Depts. Amount: $940 (registration, transportation and lodging) Justifica6on: The conference is designed to train department managers in the latest management concepts for planning and zoning departments including alternative methods and operational systems to achieve a higher level of success in the daily operations of the department. Chief Accountant Madison, WI GFOA Advanced Training July 17 - 22 Amount: $1700 (registration, transportation and lodging) Justification: The purpose of the institute is to provide participating state and local government financial officials an opportunity to examine the challenges they face in all facets of their profession. This type of governmental training is not offered locally and is important to Ms. Roberts' professional development. FISCAL IMPACT: Sufficient funds exist for the requested items. Attachment: December 1993 Government Finance Review article "State of the Art" ,,gTATE OF THE ART The 1993 Advanced. Government Finance Institute Forty-nine municipal, county and state finance officers from 23 states, two Canadian provinces and the District of Columbia gathered for the Government Finance Officers Association's (GFOA's) Advanced Government Finance Institute, July 18 through 23, 1993. This year the Institute marked its eighth anniversary and its fourth year on the Madison campus of the University of Wisconsin (UW). The lnstitute's week-long series of classroom lectures and colleague discussions gives participating state and local government finance officials the chance to escape their day-to-day activities and dilemmas to examine the challenges they face in all facets of their profession. University professors, GFOA staff, and public- and private-sector professionals lead Institute sessions. The program topics--the emerging global economy; ~t--nging demographics; developments in ice, budgeting and accounting; and .... aagerial concerns, such as leadership, motivation, ethics and communication-- surface outside as well as inside the classroom. Located in the heart of Madison's vibrant community and nestled on Lake Mendora, the UW campus provides a stimulating, academic setting for the Institute. Participants are housed in the Wisconsin Center Guest House and take aU meals together, a cohesive factor which adds significantly to the lnstitute's success: participants find it easy to linger over din- ner or have an ice cream on the lakeside terrace to continue discussions begun in Institute sessions. A short walk from the Guest House takes participants to the UW classroom facilities, the capitol square for a concert, or the shops and cafes of State Street. 1993 Participants and Faculty From the assistant city manager for finance and administration of a Missouri city of 23,100 people to the chief financial officer of Oregon's Department of Trans- portation serving 2.8 million people, parti- cipants' diverse backgrounds contribute to the exchange of innovative solutions to familiar predicaments. Most of the 1993 participants worked for a city, town or county. Others came from a state agency or a variety of special districts and authorities, including school districts, transit and port authorities, and retirement funds. While jurisdictions of all sizes were represented, nearly a third of the partici- pants' governments had populations of more than 500,000. Two-thirds of the participants served in the upper echelons of local government finance--chief finan- cial officer, treasurer/comptroller, budget director or chief accountant/auditor. The UW provided faculty memben from the schools of business and of jour- nalism, the UW's cooperative extension and applied population laboratory, and the counseling psychology department. The director of GFOA's Government Finance Research Center and a consultant in employee benefits policy and analysis supplemented the L1W faculty. GFOA members also serving on the faculty were John Gross, director of finance for' Aurora, Colorado, and Robert V. Stout, deputy finance commissioner for '~ Westchester County, New York, who chair, respectively, the' GFOA's Committee on Governmental ]~udge~ng and Manage- meat and the Committee on Accounting, Auditing and Financial Reporting. The Program The Institute began with an examination of U.S. and world economic trends by Dr. Ayse Somerun, international economist and dean of the UX~rs cooperative exten- sion. Insisting that participants with college textbooks on international trade or macroeconomics "throw them away; Somersan examined five recent funda- mental changes in the world economy: trade has grown faster than gross national product, the variability in interest and exchange rates has increased, a new food and agricultural system has emerged, the industrial production system has evolved. and markets have been globalized. Emphasizing the implications of these trends for state and local governments, Somersan encouraged participants to position their communities to constandy pursue the information they need to function in the globalized economy. Monday continued with a look at demo- graphic and employment trends--the aging of the population and the diversification of the workforce--by Dr. Paul Voss of the UXv/s applied population laboratory. Drawing attention to estimates that 85 percent of the year 2000's workforce is already in it, Voss emphasized the future need for retrainlag. Like Somenan, Voss detailed what issues state and local finance officers may face due to the trends he examined. Dr. Walter Farrell of the UW-Mil- waukee's educational policy and com- munity studies department concluded th~ day's coursework with a look at the causes of poverty in urban America and a call for state and local finance personnel to become involved in new proiects to com- bat the crisis of the cities. Examples of such projects were cited, including Mil- waukee's New Hope project, which is helping with innercity job placement and health and child care, and Wisconsin's "learnfare" program, which fights declining school attendance by reducing welfare payments to families whose children skip school. Secretary of Revenue for the State of Wisconsin Mark Bugher was the dinner speaker Monday, shedding light on Wisconsin's economic tribulations and triumphs while the sun set on the lake. The second day's program dealt with the tools of governmental finance: information technology, capital finance, accounting and budgeting. Dr. Bruce Mills of the UW-Madison's business school surveyed the latest developments in information technology and fielded a wide range of questions from participants. According to Mills, technological development can help finance officials measure performance by answering the question, "Is the taxpayer's money being spent well?" It also can present a host of new problems, however, with viruses, mismatched workers and skills, and information access issues. "Prepare for the future with investment, involvement and experimentation;' was his parting phrase. Tuesday morning continued with the director of GFOA's Research Center J.B. Kurish discussing short-term financing and long-term debt. Kurish also profiled vari- able and fixed-rate debt, presenting advan- tages, disadvantages and ideal situations for the use of each. Examinations of competitive versus negotiated sale of debt and the refunding of bonds concluded the session, which had been punctuated with participants' questions and experiences. Robert V. Stout's discussion covered a plethora of new issues in accounting and how state and local accountants and audi- tors will be affected by them. Such issues included the measurement focus/basis of accounting for governmental funds, the new definition of a reporting entity, service efforts and accomplishments (SEA), proprietary funds, and !andfill closure and post-closure costs. DECEMBER 1993 · GOVERNMENT FINANCE REVIEW Wrapping up the formal sessions for the day, John Gross examined trends in gov- ernmental budgeting. With an eye toward the future, Gross introduced Institute participants to the many issues being debated in the search for new directions in state and local government budgeting. He also looked at the impacts of tax and spending limitations on state and local governmental budgets. the Governmental Accounting Standards Board's service efforts and accomplishments initiative, and government rightsizing. Participants and faculty members spent Tuesday evening in roundtable discussions of the day's topics during a picnic on the deck overlooking Lake Mendora. Kicking off the third day of the Institute with a review of the participants' juris- dictions' retirement and health plans, Manha Priddy Patterson, director of employee benefits policy and analysis at KPMG Peat Marwick, discussed what participants indicated in a pre-lnstitute survey as the most troublesome aspects of administering retirement plans: funding, investments and complying with legal requirements. Patterson reviewed current and impending federal legislation affecting state and local government retirement systems and pension fund management. She also examined the approaching health care reform, stressing the important role states will play in reform. Dr. Denis Collins from the UW- Madison's business school used written case studies and a surprise experiment with participants as guinea pigs to examine the role of ethics within the organizational structure. Performing an ethical analysis of an organization, according to Collins, is one of the first steps to enhancing the ethical treatment of employees and taxpayers. A checklist for developing a code of ethics also was presented. Examining .the major functions of man- agement, Dr. Alma Baron from the UW- Madison's management institute con- trasted managers and leaders: managers cope with complexity, create an organiza- tional structure. and use control and prob- lem solving to reach a goal; leaders cope with change, communicate new directions, and achieve a vision through motivation and inspiration. Describing the importance of charisma. inspiration, intellectual stimulation and consideration of the individual, Dr. Baron emphasized the need for vision and commitment in state and local government organizations. Thursday morning was devoted to a session on motivating employees in a Roundtable dtscusstons alhm' Institute partacIpants to interact u,lth ,faculty and each other m an mlormal setting after a day humanistic environment. Dr. Charles Pulvino, a professor of counseling psychology at the UW-Madison, illus- trated his lecture on the cultural influences on perception with ambiguous drawings to show how people view the same picture differently. He stressed the need to be aware of the cultural diversity among employees and the potential for miscom- munication. To understand the employee's perspective is just the beginning of the communication process; Pulvino emphasized the role of managers as facilitators. Communication and interaction con- tinued to take center stage as the session on dealing with the media concluded Thursday's classroom work. Lewis Friedland, a UW-Madison professor of journalism and former ~xecutive producer for a television news program. offered an insider's view on why the media report government news items the way thev do. Searching for a hero to fight the bad- publicity beast, participants were offered suggestions on how to use honesty--as often as possible--to improve media relations. Concluding the Institute was Friday's session on executive identity and leader- ship, led by the UW-Madison's Dr. Buck Joseph. To complement the sessions on management, ethics and communication, Joseph's session added inspiration for new perspectives on personal leadership and vision to the mix of Institute topics. Case study exercises provided an addi- tional forum for interaction. Participants were divided into six teams, each receiving one of three problems: a revenue shortfall, a city-county merger or a pension fund portfolio report. The teams met informally throughout the week of the Institute to work through their situation, discuss differences and prepare a presentation. Friday morning, each team presented its solution and was critiqued by other teams. Reinvigorating Government As diplomas were distributed by GI- executive director Jeffrey L. Esser at Friday's luncheon, an aura of satisfaction, inspiration and exhaustion filled the room. Participants reflected on the Institute: lectures and discussions; speeches and roundtables; preparations and presenta- tions; even a trip to Spring Green, Wisconsin, to see the Frank Lloyd Wright Hillside School and plans for the Wright- designed Monona Terrace Convention Center in Madison. While "relaxing" may not have been a word that leapt immedi- ately to mind, participants looked forward to returning to their jurisdictions fueled with ideas for the future. ~ This article u'as prepared by NANCY GI.I-A~'}N qf GFO4 's Research Center. U 'ha assisted u 'ith the ad.tintstratto. of the 1993 Adranced Got,ernntent Ftnan(e htsttluh,. DECEMBER |993 ~* GOVERNMENT FINANCE R[VIE~I' '.. ITEM NO. 6 APPROVAT. CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Manager/City Council Mary Jane McLarney, Finance Officer April 26, 1994 Striping/Stenciling Contract Amendment RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve an increase in the contract with Orange County Striping in the amount of $10,000. DISCUSSION: On September 14, 1993 the City Council authorized a contract with Orange County Striping to provide street striping and stenciling. The fiscal year 1993-94 budget allocation was approximately $75,000 including encumbrances from fiscal year 1992- 93. When the budget was developed staff anticipated that the City's stenciling truck would be delivered December 1, 1993. However, the truck was not delivered until April 1994. Therefore, staff is requesting that the contract authorization be increased to $85,000 to complete the striping program for the year. (The new truck cannot be used for striping.) FISCAL IMPACT: The contract amendment will be covered by a transfer from account number 100-164-999-5402(Street Maintenance) to account number 100-164-999- 5410 (Striping/Stenciling). ITEM NO. 7 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROV/~T. CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFIC CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer April 26, 1994 Professional Services with Norris-Repke, Inc. for the design of John Warner Road PREPARED BY: ~> Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer. Capital Projects RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve and authorize the Mayor to sign the Professional Services Agreement between the City of Temecula and Norris-Repke, Inc. to provide Engineering Services for the design of John Warner Road, from Cabrillo Avenue to Santiago Road, for an amount not to exceed $50,051 pending approval of Service Level R funding source by the adjacent homeowners. BACKGROUND: A request for proposal (RFP) for Professional Engineering Services was developed for the preparation of plans, specifications and estimates for the interim road improvements on John Warner Road, from Cabrillo Avenue to Santiago Road. Norris-Repke, inc., was the highest ranking firm, among those submitted, to provide these professional services. The proposed John Warner Road improvements will be designed to provide for two (2) travel lanes (total 32' of pavement) within a 66 feet wide graded dedicated right-of-way. The total length of the project is approximately 3,400 feet. The consultant will perform utility research for the project and will provide topographic base maps; street improvement, storm drain, signing end striping plans; hydrology, 'hydraulic and soil reports; pot holing and utility coordination; project specifications, cost estimates, and obtain all necessary outside agency permits. The consultant's proposal also provides for preparation of legal descriptions and plats that will be required for the necessary drainage easements for the storm drain improvements and slope easements. The proposed schedule is for Norris-Repke, Inc. to start the preliminary design work in mid- June pending approval of Service Level R funding source by the adjacent homeowners. The total design cost of $50,051 includes the subconsultants for the aerial photography and geotechnical investigations. r:~gd~t%94~0426~wemerlejl, FISCAL IMPACT: The total design cost for John Warnet Road is ~50,051 which will be funded by Service Level R if approved. r:~agdrpt~g4~O42~warner/njp AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEERING DESIGN PLANS FOR JOHN WARNER ROAD THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 26th day of April, 1994; between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City" and Norris- Reoke, Into, a California Cornoration, hereinafter referred to as "Consultant". The parties her.to mutually agree as follows: SERVICES. Consultant shall perform the tasks set forth in Exhibit "A" attached her.to. Consultant shall complete the tasks according to the schedule set forth in Exhibit "A". PERFORMANCE. Consultant shall at all times, faithfully, industrially and to the best of his ability, experience and talent, perform all tasks described her. in. e PAYMENT. The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, at the hourly rates set forth in Exhibit "B" attached her.to, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. This amount will not exceed $50,051.00for the total term of the Agreement unless additional payment is approved by the City Council; provided that the City Manager may approve additional payments not to exceed ten percent (10%) of the Agreement, but in no event more than ~ 10,000. Consultant will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed. Invoices shall be submitted on or about the first business day of each month, for services provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice· SUSPENSION. TERMINATION OR ABANDONMFNT OF A~RFEMENT. The City may, at any time, suspend, terminate or abandon this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the Consultant at least ten (10) days prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Consdtant shall immediately cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. Within thirty-five (35) days after receiving an invoice from the Consultant, the City shall pay Consultant for work done through the date that work is to be ceased pursuant to this section. If the City suspends, terminates or abandons a portion of this Agreement such suspension, termination or abandonment shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement. e BREACH OF CONTRACT. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under the terms of this Agreement, the City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work performed after the date of default. Default shall include not performing the tasks described her.in to the reasonable satisfaction of the City Manager of the City. Failure by the Consultant to make progress in the performance of work her.under, if such failure arises out of causes beyond his control, and without fault or negligence of the Consultant, shall not be considered a default. -1 - r. V~eewiek~non, b.agrlejp e e ga If the City Manager or his 'delegate determines that the Consultam defaults in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the Consultant with written notice of the default. The Consultant shall have ten (10) days after service upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the Consultam fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement. TERM. This Agreement shall commence on June 1, 1994, and shall remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than June 1, 1995. Any disputes regarding performance, default or other matters in dispute between the City and the Consultam arising out of this Agreement or breech thereof, shall be resolved by arbitration. The arbitrator's decision shall be final. Consultam shall select an arbitrator from a list provided by the City of three retired judges of the Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services, Inc. The arbitration hearing shall be conducted according to California Code of Civil'Procedure Section 1280, etsea. City and Consultant shall share the cost of the arbitration equally. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS. Upon satisfactory completion of, or in the event of termination, suspension or abandonment of this Agreement, all original documents, designs, drawings and notes prepared in the course of providing the services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission of the Consultant. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. The Consultant is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent contractor. Neither the City nor any of its officers, employees or agents shall have control over the conduct of the Consultant or any of the Consultant's officers, employees or agents, except as herein set forth. The Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultam for performing services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Consultam for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES. The Consultant shall keep itself informed of State and Federal laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Consultant shall at all times observe and comply with all such laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Consultant to comply with this section. r:,~eewick~noffis.egrldp 10. 11. 12. NOTICE· Whenever it shall be necessary for either party to serve notice on the other respecting this Agreement, such notice shall be served by certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the City Manager of the City of Temecula, located at 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California 92590, and the Consultant at 33055 Vino Way, Temecda, California 9259~1 unless and until different addresses may be furnished in writing by either party to the other. Notice shall be deemed to have been served seventy-two (72) hours after the same has been deposited in the United States Postal Services. This shall be valid and sufficient service of notice for all purposes. ASSIGNMENT. The Consultant shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due her. under, without the prior written consent of the City. Upon termination of this Agreement, Consultant's sole compensation shall be the value to the City of the services rendered. LIABILITY INSURANCF. The Consultant shall maintain insurance acceptable to the City in full force an effect throughout the term of this contract, against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work her. under by the Consultant, his agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors. Insurance is to be placed with insurer with a Bests' rating of no less than A:VII. The costs of such insurance shall be included in the Contractor's bid. The Consultant shall provide the following scope and limits of insurance: A. Minimum Scooe of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as: Insurance Services Office Form No. GL-0002 (Ed. 1/73) covering Comprehensive General Liability and Insurance Services Office Form No. GL-0404 covering Broad Form Comprehensive General Liability; or Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage ("occurrence" Form No. CG-0001 ). Insurance Services Office Form No. CA-0001 (Ed. 1/78) covering Automobile Liability, Code I "any auto" and Endorsement CA-0025. Workers' Compensation insurance as required by Labor Code of the State of California and Employers' Liability insurance. 4. Errors and Omissions insurance. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Contractor shall maintain limits of insurance no less than: General Liability: $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage. e Automobile Liability: $1,000,000combined single limit per accident for bodily injury and property damage. e Workers' Compensation and Employers' Liability: Workers' Compensation as required by the Labor Code of the State of California and Employers' Liability limits of $1,000,000 per accident. 4. Errors and Omissions Insurance: e 1,000,000 per occurrence. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductible in excess of $1,000 must be declared to and approved by the City. Other Insurance Provisions. Insurance policies required by this contract shall contain or be endorsed to contain the following provisions: All Policies. Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days prior written notice to the City vie United States First Class Mail. ~eneral liability and Automobile Liability Coveraoes. The City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Consultant; products and completed operations of the Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by the Consultant, or automobiles owned, lease, hired or borrowed by the Consultant. The coverage shall contain no special-limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers. With regard to claims arising from the Consultant's performance of the work described in this contract, the Consultant's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall apply in excess of, and not contribute with, the Consultant's insurance. Any failure to comply with the reporting provisions of the policies shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its officers officials, employees or volunteers. The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. Worker's ComDensation and Emolovers' Liability CoveraQe. The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers for losses arising from work performed by the Consultant for the City. Verification of CoveraQe. Contractor shall furnish the City with certificates of insurance effecting coverage required by this clause. The certificates for each insurance policy are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The certificates are to be on forms provided by the City and are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. The City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, at any time. '4.- r.'tbeswick%non~s. sgrlajp Consultant shell include all subconsultants as insureds under its policies or shall furnish separate certificates for each subcontractor. All coverages for subcontractors shall be subject to ell of the requirements stated herein. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City. At the option of the City, either: the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects the City, its officers, officials and employees; or the Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense expenses. 13. LICENSES. The Consultant and subconsultant shall obtain all necessary licenses, including but not limited to City Business License. 14. INDEMNIFICATION. The Consultant agrees to indemnify and save harmless the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, losses, defense cost, or liability of any kind or nature which the City, its officers, agents and employees may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of Consultant's negligent performance under the terms of this Agreement, excepting only liability arising out of the sole negligence of the City. 15. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement and any documents or instrument attached hereto or referred to herein integrate all terms and conditions mentioned herein or incidental hereto supersede all negotiations and prior writing in respect to the subject matter hereof. In the event of conflict between the terms, conditions, or provisions of this Agreement and any such document or instrument, the terms and conditions of this Agreement shall prevail. EFFECTIVE DATE AND EXECUTION: after the date it is signed by the representatives in counterparts. This Agreement shall be effective from and of the City. This Agreement may be executed r:.~beewick~x~fte.egrlmjp IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CONSULTANT CITY OF TEMECULA By: By Norris-Repke, Inc. Ron Roberts, Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney, ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk EXHIBIT "A" TASKS TO BE PERFORMED SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "A" EXHIBIT "A" r.~b,wteVxxf,,.eer/aie EXHIBIT "A" J' 2 NoRRis-REPKE, INc. Consurcinf:l Civil EngineePs enc~ Lencl Sur'veyoPs _ 33055 VINO WAY · TEMECULA. CA 9P591 - [714) 676-5816 3a.auary 6, 1994 [714] 676-8488 ' Jact P. Norris. FE Warren W. Fleple. I~ Randy G. Bern/. PE Joseph M. L, oyol;ho. PLS' lVh-. Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer Public Works Department City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 Reference: RFP #22 - John Warher Road NRI P-749a Dear Mr. Spagnolo: We appreciate the opportunity to present this proposal to provide professional engineering services for the street improvements on the subject project. Norris-Repke is well qualified to provide the required services and offers the City the following: 1. A fnm with extensive experience in providing services to public agencies. 2. We specialize in street improvement projects and have successfully completed a long list of such projects. 3. Our entire project team brings a wealth of experience in the design of street improvemere projects similar to those in this project. This asset is essential to a successful project. Our history of successful projects and clients over the past nine years is additional insurance that the City will be satisfied with our approach, expertise, responsiveness and the final product. Soils investigation and pavement design will be performed by GeoSoils, Inc. of Murrieta. GeoSoils is a highly qualified geotechnical finn, well-respected in Southern California with specific knowledge of this locality. Hank Mohle & Associates will be the trafiSc engineering subconsultant. Hank has been practicing traffic engineering in Southern California for decades. He serves as the City of Murrieta's contract traffic engineer and is well acquainted with this area. We have a professional relationship with both firms dating back many years. Their discussions lump all four projects in RFP #22 together. MAIN OFFICE: 18231 IRVINE BLVD. · SUITE 204 * TUSTIN. CA 92680 * (714) 730-6410 * (714] 730-6396 Mr. Don Spagnolo City of Temecula January 6, 1994 NRI P-749a Page 2 We are a highly computerized firm and use modem methods in our approach to survey, design and plan preparation of street improvement projects. We keep well informed on the latest street rehabilitation and improvement methods and the design and construction requirements for those methods. It is our goal to provide the highest quality professional service. We want to be proud of each project. We recently completed the design of two road projects for the City of Murrieta involving new roadways, widerrings and rehabilitation, as well as drainage improvements. One project is under construction. The second smaller project under the same engineering contract is in review. Sruveying was performed by our own crew, and we subcontracted the soils engineering to GeoSoils, Inc. of Murrieta. We want very much to begin working with the City of Temecula and look forward to a successful project should we be selected. Thank you for the opportunity to submit this proposal. It is valid until August 1, 1994. We applaud your QBS approach. Sincerely, 'Ja . rris, PE JPN:mr c:\wp6~pro\749a.pro NORRIS-REPKE, INC. ' City of Temecula Engineering Services Proposal for Street Improvements on John Warher Road TARI ,F. OF CONTENTS PROJECT DISCUSSION. ................................... 1 THE FIRM ........................................... 5 PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND KEY PERSONNEL .................... 5 QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE ........................... 7 SCOPE OF SERVICES ..................................... 7 SCHEDULING ......................................... 13 -APPENDIX - · STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT LIST' · RIGHT OF WAY ENGINEERING & ACQUISITION LIST · STORM DRAIN PROJECTS LIST · RESUMES · FEDERAL FORM 254 · TABLE OF TASKS · HANK MOHLE & ASSOCIATES PROPOSAL · GEOSOILS, INC. PROPOSAL NORRIS-REPKE. INC. City of Temecula Engineering Services Proposal for Street Improvements on John Warher Road NRI P-749a January 6, 1994 Page. 1 of 13 PROJECT DISCUSSION: Approximately 2700' of the total 3400' of John Wamer Road is a graded dirt road on a 66' right of way (per AP maps) and requires full construction with some grading (Photo 32). The corridor is to be improved to a Local Mountain Residential SWeet per City Standard Plan #111: 28' of pavement on a 50' right of way; with a 4' shoulder, or an AC dike and 5' parkway. The block from Cabrillo to Jeramie, about 700', is already paved 24' wide (Photo 30) and so will need to be widened to achieve a 28' pavement width. The existing pavement appears on the surface to be in- good shape; its strength will need evaluation to determine if strengthening by overlaying is warranted. There are five intersections with other public roads. A significant watercourse crosses three times (Photo 31 ) but the upper two are through existing culverts. Another larger dry creek crosses near Santiago through a culvert (Photo 33). The alignment is curv'y and the grades gentle to steep. No additional fight of way should be needed, but possibly a slope easement near Jeramie. The design will involve smoothing the profile while matching or-qlightly lowering the grades at existing driveways. A new culvert will be required where the watercourse flows over the road. The existing culverts will be analyzed for adequacy. NORRIS-REPKE. INC; NR/P-749a January 5, 1994 Page 2 of 13 NORRIS-REPKE, INC. NRI P-749a January 5, 1994 Page 3 of 13 32: Looking Northeasterly NORRIS-REPKE. INC. NR/P-749a January 5, 1994 Page 5 of 13 THE FIRM: NORRIS-REPKE, INC., was founded in 1984 to provide professional civil engineering, land surveying and technical services to public agencies and the private sector in the Southern California area. We have served 35 cities, counties and districts in that time. Our philosophy is to determine, understand and satisfy the needs of our clients and act as an extension of their staff. Our prime objective is to provide the highest quality of professional and technical services in a cost-effective, timely and personaiized manner. Each project is personally managed by a principal of the firm assuring project continuity from start to finish. Due to the background of the principals and key personnel, we can offer the benefits of a wide range of knowledge and experience that makes us sensitive to the needs ofour clients. We understand the complete project process and are able to provide the necessary services to guide projects from the early planning stages through design and completion of construction. We are a growing and progressive firm. We use computer technology extensively for maximum project efficiency and maintain an array of computer hardware and sofhrare including CAD and an integrated electronic surveying system. The company is headed by its two principals. Jack Norris and Warren Repke, both registered civil engineers. Other registered civil engineers include Randall Berry who has been with us six years, Scott Jewett and, as of the new year, Noel Torkelson, formerly principal of GPS Consulting Engineers who closed their business at year end. Professional land surveyor Joseph Loyatho heads our surveying and mapping department. Our twelve personnel include a recent civil engineer graduate, surveyors, drafters, technicians, a civil ~nginee~ng student intern and administrative - people. PROJECT MANAGE~NT AND KEY PERSONNEL: NORRIS-REPKE, INC. believes that effective organization and management is vital to the successful completion of the project. Communication between us and the City must be at the highest level throughout all phases of the project. For this reason we propose to assign a Project Manager who will be responsible for execution of the work program and be the principle project contact. Jack Norris would be the principal in charge/project manager and contact person for city staff. He roans the Temecula branch office where the engineering would be done. Detailed design, drafting, estimating and typing would be performed in the Tustin main office. NORRIS-RED'KE, INC. NRi P-749a January 5, 1994 Page 6 of 13 Mr. Norris is a registered civil engineer (#C 15446) in California and a member of the American Society of Civil Engineers where he is actively involved in committee and technical group functions. During his public and private engineering career Ma'. Non-is has been involved with numerous street improvement, grading and drainage projects of all types including those listed on the street improvement project list included in the Appendix. Additional expertise is available from Warren W. Repke. Mr. Repke has been involved in public works planning; design and construction since 1965. During this time he was employed by the State Department of Water Resources and the cities of Buena Park, Costa Mesa and Orange as well as a Southern California consulting engineering firm prior to the formation of Nor~s-Repke, Inc. in 1984. Assisting Jack, detailed design would be supervised by Scott Jewitt, P.E. Surveying will be performed by Norris-Repke, Inc., crews under the supervision of Joseph Loyatho, Professional Land Surveyor. The resumes of Jack, Warren, Joseph and Soctt are included in the Appendix. In addition to the above key personnel, appropriate members of the Norris-Repke, Inc., technical, drafting and clerical staff will provide assistance where required to insure the project tasks are completed with high quality and on schedule. Our organizational structure for these projects would be as below: Jack P. Norris, P.E. Principal/Project Engineer Randall G. Berry, ~.E. Engineering Mananer [ I Joseph M. Lo.~mtho, P.L.S. ~ Survey Manager I Richard Msher [ [ Dave Hill Survey Technician $uvey Technician I lSconJewen, P.E- Assistant Project Engineer [ eer St. Drsftcr Technician NORRIS-REPKE, INC. NRI P-749a January 5, 1994 Page 7 of 13 QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE We believe Nonis-Repke, Inc., is well qualified to perform the requested services due to the following. 1. We have extensive experience in providing services to public agencies including many cities. 2. We specialize in street widening, rehabilitation, new construction and drainage projects and have successfully completed a long list of such projects. , Our entire project team brings a wealth of experience in the design of street and drainage projects and have successfully completed a long list of such pr{~jects. We understand the project design requirements and issues associated with developing a project of this nature and are aware of the unique areas of design and specifications development that must be addressed. We have prepared projects under Community Development Block Grant requirements, redevelopment agency requirements (although not Riverside specifically) and several more. 5. Our history of successful projects and clients over the past nine years is additional insurance that the City will' be satisfied with our approach, expertise, responsiveness and the final product. SCOPE OF SERVICES Based on the City request for proposal, our field investigation of the site, discuision with City staff and our prior experience, we have proposed a four phase work program that considers the project concerns and develops the appropriate designs and construction documents. The initial phases are concerned with data collection and developing the project concepts and elements and elements followed by a construction documents preparation and construction phase. These are further described below. PHASE I: ORiENTATION/DATA COLLECTION A. Orientation 1. Hold "kickoff' meeting with City staff. Our approach would be discussed and necessary criteria established. Information required from the City would be requested. 2. Obtain AP maps for (right of way) determination. 3. Revisit the site to refresh our memory of its features and to visualize the design. NORRIS-REPKE, INC. B. Soils investigation/Pavement design NRI P-749a January 5, 1994 Page 8 of 13 Conduct soils investigation. Prepare report with recommendations on grading, subgrade preparation and preliminary pavement design. This would be performed by GeoSoils, Inc. Please refer to their detailed scope of services in the Appendix. Final pavement design on Waleott fills may not be possible until near completion of rough grading. C. Topographic Survey 1. Establish centerline control and stationing based on control data provided by the City in the immediate area of the projects. Set and document horizontal control markers. 2. Establish vertical control and temporary project bench marks from local benchmarks. Locate all pertinent topographic features within the fight of way. Locate additional topography beyond fight of way where slope grading will be required, and existing dirt and paved driveways may need to be regraded or reconstructed to meet future fight of way grade. 4. Plot cross-sections of existing pavement. Obtain complete topography at locations of proposed drainage improvements necessary. for proper design. Return if necessary during the design phase to obtain additional information required by the project engineer. D. Utility Research and Initial Notification By letter, notify the utility companies of the upcoming project to aid their planning, and request utility locations. (Potholing may be requested later -- see "Project Analysis and Design".) Right of Way Research Obtain assessors parcel maps and any other documents in City files to determine existing fights of way. F. Drainage Research Obtain available design peak Q's of crossing watercourses from the City or RCFCWCD. Where Q's are not available, obtain topographic maps CLISGS minimum) to enable our own calculations. NORRIS-REPKE, INC. NRI P-749a January 5, 1994 Page 9 of 13 PHASE II: BASE SHEETS AND CONCEPT PLANS A. Topographic Base Sheets Plan and profile base sheets would be prepared on mylar sheets at a scale of 1 "=40'. These base sheets would be prepared using AutoCAD 12 and include the following: 1. Street right of way. Property lines from Assessor's Maps. 2. Centerline control and stationing. 3. Location of existing street improvements and topographic features obtained from field survey, including trees, shrubs, irrigation lines and fences. 4., Utility locations. 5. Profiles of centerline and existing curb, 'berm or right of way. 6. Contours with appropriate contour intervals. 7. The topography would be backgrounded or "screened."' B. Field Review Perform comprehensive field review of all street areas to determine the following: 1. Existing conditions that may affect design. 2. Drainage requirements. 3. Private property alteration (grade transition new right of way line). Develop Project Analysis and Design we would prepare conceptual plans and complete hydrology studies at this stage, with alternatives as appropriate. Included would be mush grading extents, preliminary earthwork quantities, and preliminary design of drainage facilities. We would request the proposed profile of Santiago Road from that consultant. NORRIS-REPKE, INC. NRI P-749a January5, 1994 Page 10 of 13 At critical locations additional underground utility information may be required. We realize the utility companies' record plans are somelimes deficient. In such instances we will arrange for potholing and will accurately survey the actual utility locations. We will meet with City staff to discuss our recommendations and reach concurrence on the final project design. PHASE III: CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS Based on the results of Phase II, the final construction documents would be prepared. The following is an outline of the scope of services for preparation and processing of the construction documents for the project. A. Construction Document Preparation 1. Complete project title sheet using AutoCAD 12. Prepare plan and profile sheets at a scale of 1 "=40' showing construction to conform to the approved concept plan. Construction elements would be clearly defined. New centerline profiles would be shown. Erosion control measures would be shown on these plans. 3. Prepare plans, profiles and details of drainage improvements, with all pertinent hydraulic information including HGL in profile, design frequency, Q, v, D, and De. 4. Prepare detail sheet for typical sections and details. 5. Prepare signing and striping plans. Prepare complete project specifications using City Special Provisions and "boiler plate", and the Green Book as the Standard Specifications, using WordPerfect 6. City to provide basic boiler plate on disk for our editing. Prepare itemized construction quantities and cost estimate for the present phase using Lotus 123. The underlying tales would be keyed to color-coded plans. Earthwork quantities would include subsidence and shrinkage (or swell). We would specify requirements for traffic control and for the preparation of a detour, phasing and traffic control plan. NORRIS-REPKE, INC. NR/P-749a January 5, 1994 Page 11 of 13 B. Right of Way Document Preparation 1. Prepare maps and legal descriptions of slope easements to be obtained. 2. Prepare letters of permission to grade on private property. 3. Provide miscellaneous services to assist the City in the process of obtaining above. C. Construction Document Processing 1. Upon completion of the preliminary plans, specifications and cost estimate, submit two sets of each to the City for initial review and comment. Submit all documentation (plans, specs, estimate, drainage reports, applications, letters of interest, etc.) necessary to obtain all required permits from the agencies and districts including federal (NPDES compliance, COE), state (Fish and Game) and water districts (MWD, EMWD, RCWD). Maintain communication with those entities to facilitate approval. 3. Meet with City staff to discuss results of City staff review. , Make agreed revisions and corrections to the plans, specifications and cost estimate and submit the original plans, specifications, survey data, and itemized cost estimate to City for bidding. D. Utility Coordination 1. Prepare preliminary utility notices and send preliminary plans to utilities at the same time we submit plans to the City for initial review. We will monitor responses from utility companies and coordinate with utility companies regarding relocation of facilities. This does not include the design of any utility relocations for the utility companies. · 3. Send final utility notice to each utility company. NORRIS-REPKE, INC. NKI P-749a January 5, 1994 Page 12 of 13 PHASE IV: BIDDING AND CONSTRUCTION Prepare bid specification package including: bidders' instructions, bid sheets, general specifications, special provisions and technical specifications using the City's boiler plate contract documents. Draft the report to the City Council for authorization to advertise for bids. Reproduce a number of bid documents for Contractors' pickup. B. Answer questions during bidding and issue addenda if necessary. C$ Attend bid opening. Review and analyze completeness. Check low bidder's references. council for contract award. bids for correct arithmetic, balance and Prepare bid summary. Prepare report to D. Attend pre-constmction meeting. E. View the progress of the work daily. Clarify plans and answer questions regarding the prepared designs and specifications during construction if necessary.. City Responsibilities The City would assume the following responsibilities: 1. Make available and provide all existing data and information relevant to the proposed project. 2. Provide copy of existing street construction plans. 3. Plan checking. 4. Construction management and inspection. 5. Right of way acquisition. NORRIS-REPKE, INC. NRI P-749a January 5, 1994 Page 13 of 13 SCHEDULING NORRIS-REPKE, INC. proposes to provide the services outlined in accordance with the following project schedule. The schedule is based on past experience in providing the services as outlined in this proposal. Our present work load would allow this. We have ongoing field and office work but desire a continual influx to sustain operations. Calendar Weeks End of Week #: Orientation/Data Collection · Soils Investigation Base Sheets and Concept Plans Meet with City (Concept Plans) Prepare PS&E Submit City Review Finalize PS&E .... 0 4 8 12 16 20 22 NORRIS-REPKE, INC. EXHIBIT "B" PAYMENT SCHEDULE SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT 'B" EXHIBIT "B" EXHIBIT "B" JOHN M~RI~ER RO~D NORI::IIS-R PKEE. INC. 676-5816 FAX: {3-4-41 676-8488 W.rren W. Repke. 1:6 Joaeph M, LoyeUto. PLS NORRIS-REPKE, INC. SCHEDULE OF STANDARD HOURLY RATF~ ............ 9110.00 .... 83.00 .... 10,00 .... e3, O0 31.00 37.00 17.00 Field Inspector - Licensed Land Surveyor ........................... Sun, ey Crew (3-man) ................................. lSO. O0 (a-man) ................................. t2s. oo Survey Travel Time I st one-half hour each way ................... · I/"2 crew rate After 1st one-half hour each way ....................... E/pe~ Teatimony (2 hour minimum) ..................... 160.00 The above fees will be escaJated 5% on each A, ugusl I beginning AuguSt l, 1994, for any work uncompleled ot titat time for reasons beyond Engineers control Outside agency fecs and rcproducUons arc not included in above fees and will be billed .at cost plus I o%, c,-wpe~mkd~eee3.e~ MAIN OFFICE: 18P31 IRVINE BLVD. · SUffE ;04 · TUBTIN, CA 9!~680 · (714) 73CLB410 * FAX: [714) 730-6396 ITEM NO. 8 ~PPROVAT. CITY ATTORNEY~~.~~ CITY OF TEMECULA AOENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: City Council/City Manager Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer April 26, 1994 SUBJECT: Professional Services with NBS/Lowry for the design of Santiago Road PREPARED BY: ~ Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve and authorize the Mayor to sign the Professional Services Agreement between the City of Temecula and NBS/Lowry to provide Engineering Services for the design of Santiago Road, from 300 feet east of Vallejo Avenue to 1100 feet west of Avenida de San Pasqual, for an amount not to exceed $46,400 pending approval of Service I:evel R funding source by the adjacent homeowners. BACKGROUND: A request for proposal (RFP) for Professional Engineering Services was developed for the preparation of plans, specifications and estimates for the interim road improvements on Santiago Road, from 300 feet east of Vallejo Avenue to 1100 feet west of Avenida de San Pasqual. NBS/Lowry was the highest ranking firm, among those submitted, to provide these professional services. The proposed Santiago Road improvements will be designed to provide for two (2) travel lanes (total 32' of pavement) within a 110' wide graded dedicated right-of-way. The total length of the project is approximately 8,500 feet. The consultant will perform utility research for the project and will provide topographic base maps; street improvement, storm drain, signing and striping plans; hydrology,'hydraulic and soil reports; pot holing and utility coordination; project specifications, cost estimates, and obtain all necessary outside agency permits. The consultant's proposal also provides for preparation of legal descriptions and plats that will be required for the necessary drainage easements for the storm drain improvements and slope easements. The proposed schedule is for NBS/Lowry to start the preliminary design work in mid-June pending approval of Service Level R funding source by the adjacent homeowners. The total design cost of $46,400 includes the subconsultants for the aerial photography and geotechnical investigations. r:~agdrpt%g4~O426~emntlegolmjp FISCAL IMPACT: The total desi~)n cost for Santia0o Road is ~46,400 which will be funded by Service Level R if approved. r:%mgdrpt~94~O42hmntbgolejp AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEERING DESIGN PLANS FOR SANTIAGO ROAD THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 26th day of April, 1994, between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City" and NBS/Lowrv, a California Corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Consultant". The parties hereto mutually agree as follows: e SERVICES. Consultant shall perform the tasks set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Consultam shall complete the tasks according to the schedule set forth in Exhibit "A". e PERFORMANCE. Consultant shall at all times, faithfully, industrially and to the best of his ability, experience and talent, perform all tasks described herein. PAYMENT· The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, at the hourly rates set forth in Exhibit "B" attached hereto, based upon' actual time spent on the above tasks. This amount will not exceed $46,400.00for the total term of the Agreement unless additional payment is approved by the City Council; orovided that the City Manager may approve additional payments not to exceed ten percent (10%) of the Agreement, but in no event more than $10,000. Consultam will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed. Invoices shall be submitted on or about the first business day of each month, for services provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice. SUSPENSION. TERMINATION OR ABANDONMENT OF AGREEMENT. The City may, at any time, suspend, terminate or abandon this Agreement, or any portion hereof,. by serving upon the Consultant at least ten (10) days prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Consultant shall immediately cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. Within thirty-five (35) days after receiving an invoice from the Consultam, the City shall pay Consultant for work done through the date that work is to be ceased pursuant to this section. If the City suspends, terminates or abandons a portion of this Agreement such suspension, termination or abandonment shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement. BREACH OF CONTRACT. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under the terms of this Agreement, the City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work performed after the date of default. Default shall include not performing the tasks described herein to the reasonable satisfaction of the City Manager of the City. Failure by the Consultam to make progress in the performance of work hereunder, if such failure arises out of causes beyond his control, and without fault or negligence of the Consultant, shall not be considered a default. -1 - r.~beswlek~erds.sgrle If the City Manager or his delegate determines that the Consultant defaults in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the Consultant with written notice of the default. The Consultant shall have ten (10) days after service upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the Consdtant fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement. TERM. This Agreement shall commence on June 1, 1994, and shall remain and continue in effect until tasks described her. in are completed, but in no event later than June 1, 1995. Any disputes regarding performance, default or other matters in dispute between the City and the Consultant arising out of this Agreement or breech thereof, shall be resolved by arbitration. The arbitrator's decision shall be final. Consultant shall select an arbitrator from a list provided by the City of three retired judges of the Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services, Inc. The arbitration hearing shall be conducted according to California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1280, et sea. City and Consultant shall share the cost of the arbitration equally. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS. Upon satisfactory completion of, or in the event of termination, suspension or abandonment of this Agreement, all original documents, designs, drawings and notes prepared in the course of providing the services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission of the Consultant. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. The Consultant is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent contractor. Neither the City nor any of its officers, employees or agents shall have control over the conduct of the Consultant or any of the Consultant's officers, employees or agents, except as her. in set forth. The Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant. for performing services her.under for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES. The Consultant shall keep itself informed of State and Federal laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Consultant shall at all times observe and 'comply with all such laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Consultant to comply with this section, 10. 11. 12. NOTICF. Whenever it shall be necessary for either party to serve notice on the other respecting this Agreement, such notice shall be served by certifie~l mail, postage prepaid', return receiptrequested, addressed to the City Manager of the City of Temecula, located at 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecule, California 92590, and the Consultam at 1545 West Rorida Avenue, P.O. Box 851, Hemet, California 92546-0851 unless and until different addresses may be furnished in writing by either party to the other. Notice shall be deemed to have been served seventy-two (72) hours after the same has been deposited in the United States Postal Services. This shall be valid and sufficient service of notice for all purposes. ASSInNMENT. The Consultam shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without the prior written consent of the City. Upon termination of this Agreement, Consdtant's sole compensation shall be the value to the City of the services rendered. LIABILITY INSURANCE. The Consultam shall maintain insurance acceptable to the City in full force an effect throughout the term of this contract, against claims for injuries to persons or damages. to property which. may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultam, his agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors. Insurance is to be placed with insurer with a Bests' rating of no less than A:VII. The costs of such insurance shall be included in the Contractor's bid. The Consultam shall provide the following scope and limits 'of insurance: A. Minimum Scooe of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as: Insurance Services Office Form No· GL-0002 (Ed. 1/73) covering Comprehensive General Liability and Insurance Services Office Form No. GL-0404 covering Broad Form Comprehensive General Liability; or Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage ("occurrence" Form No. CG-0001 ). Insurance Services Office Form No. CA-0001 (Ed. 1/78) covering Automobile Liability, Code. 1 "any auto" and Endorsement CA-0025. Workers' Compensation insurance as required by Labor Code of the State of California and Employers' Liability insurance. 4. Errors end Omissions insurance. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Contractor shall maintain limits of insurance no less than: General Liability: $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage. Automobile Liability: ~ 1,000,000combined single limit per accident for bodily injury end property damage. Workers' Compensation and Employers' Liability: Workers' Compensation as required by the Labor Code of the State of California and Employers' Liability limits of $1,000,000 per accident. -3- r. Uaswick~ords.sgrlsip De 4. Errors and Omissions Insurance: $1,000,000 per occurrence. Deductibles And Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductible in excess of $1,000 must be declared to and approved by the City. Other Insurance Provisions. Insurance policies required by this contract shall contain or be endorsed to contain the following provisions: ee All Policies. Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days prior written notice to the City via United States First Class Mail. General Liability and Automobile Liability Coveraaes. The City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Consultant; products and completed operations of the Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by the Consultant, or automobiles owned, lease, hired or borrowed by the Consultant. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers. With regard to claims arising from the Consultant's performance of the work described in this contract, the Consultant'a insurance coverage · shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall apply in excess of, and not contribute with, the Consultant's insurance. Any failure to comply with the reporting provisions of the policies shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its officers officials, employees or volunteers. The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. Worker's Compensation end Emolovers' Liability Coverage. The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers for losses arising from work performed by the Consultant for the City. Verification of Coverage. Contractor shall furnish the City with certificates of insurance effecting coverage required by this clause. The certificates for each insurance policy are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The certificates are to be on forms provided by the City and are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. The City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, at any time. -4. F.~eswick%ne~s.agr/alp Consultant shall include all subconsultants as insureds under its policies or shall furnish separate certificates for each subcontractor. All coverages 'for subcontractors shall be subject to all of the requirements stated herein. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City. At the option of the City, either: the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects the City, its officers, officials and employees; or the Consultant shall procure a bond guarenteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense expenses. 13. LICENSES. The Consultant and subconsultant shall obtain all necessary licenses, including but not limited to City Business License. 14. INDEMNIFICATION. The Consultant agrees to indemnify and save harmless the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, losses, defense cost, or liability of any kind or nature which the City, its officers, agents and employees may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of Consultant's negligent performance under the terms of this Agreement, excepting only liability arising out of the sole negligence of the City. 15. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement and any documents or instrument attached hereto or referred to herein integrate all terms and conditions mentioned herein or incidental hereto supersede all negotiations and prior writing in respect to the subject matter hereof. In the. event of conflict between the terms, conditions, or provisions of this Agreement and any such document or instrument, the terms and conditions of this Agreement shall prevail. - EFFECTIVE DATE AND EXECUTION: This Agreement shall be effective from and after the date it is signed by the representatives of the City. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CONSULTANT CITY OF TEMECULA By: By NBS/Lowry Ron Roberts, Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney, ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk EXHIBIT "A" TASKS TO BE PERFORMED SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "A" EXHIBIT "A" EXHIBIT 'A" NB OWRY R91-014.014 ENGINEERS & i545 Vcest Fi0riOa Avenue P.O. Box 853 heroes, Colilornia 92546.085; PLANNERS 909-658-7116 909-652-8804 fax March 23, 1994 Don Spagnolo City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula CA '92590 SUBJECT: SANTIAGO ROAD Dear Don: As requested we have prepared a preliminary engineer's opinion of probable cost and a scope of work/fee estimate for the. Santiago Road improvement project. Our opinion of probable cost has been separated into two parts: a) the entire project and, b) Vallejo to John Warner. We trust this information will suit your needs to further assess the project. We would like to have the opportunity to meet with you to discuss the scope of work/fee and opinion of cost prior to further action by the City so that you can feel comfortable with our understanding of the work entailed in this project. Please give me a call to establish a time. We look forward to working with the City on this project. Very truly yours, Michael J, Stearns Vice President MJS:bsv Enclosures SANTIAGO ROAD Scope of Work (Proposed Fee for 300' east of Vallejo to 1,100' west of Pasquel) Phase One Preliminary Investigation' and Design 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 Task Data Collection ($420) Surveying/Aerial Photogrammetry ($8,700) Geotechnical Investigations ($10, 150) Preliminary Design/Cost Estimate ($875) Agency/Public Coordination ($560) Description Gather and review relevant technical data, reference drawings, street improvement and utility plans, boundary and ownership records, City and applicable agency design standards and master plans. Conduct a site review, field surveys and aerial photogrammetric survey to locate relevant features, characteristics, topography and cul- ture. Cross-sections will be developed from the aerial mapping and submitted with the design plans. Soils and geotechnical investigation and reports will be prepared including an analysis and recommendation regarding "R" values of sub- grade materials, roadway structural sections, over-excavation, and slope grading. Using field survey data, aerial topo, and infor- mation obtained through data collection, prepare preliminary plans and details. Prepare a preliminary construction cost estimate to allow for adjustments as the design proceeds based upon City of Temecula preferences. Coordinate design issues with the City of Temecula, other affected agencies .and property owners as appropriate. Notify in writing, existing utilities of the proposed improvements, reques, ting their review and comment' concerning potential conflict/relocation. NB%WRF 1.6' 1.7 ,Task Permits (S420) 30 Percent Submittal Design Descrfption Investigate and process required permits and licenses from jurisdictional agencies, including the City of Temecula, utility purveyors and other affected agencies. Meet with the City of Temecula's project en- gineer to review project progress. Thirty per- cent (30%) submittal shall include horizontal alignment for both road and storm drain improvements. Phase Two Final Engineering Design 2.1 Easement Acquisition/ Permission to Grade Letter ($2,550) Prepare legal descriptions and plats for tem- porary/permanent slope and/or storm drain easementS. Prepare letters, descriptions and platS as necessary for grading outside of exis- ting right-of-way. Legal descriptions, plats and. letters will be prepared by NBS/Lowry for processing by the City. Title reports obtained by the City, will be used to establish ownership and for the preparation of formal legal descrip- tions and other documents for processing each impacted parcel. 2.2 Hydrology/ Hydraulics ($2,700) Prepare hydrology and hydraulic providing necessary calculations to installation of proposed culverts. report support 2.3 Final PS & E ($17,400) Based on comments received from City, utility purveyors and other agencies, prepare final construction plans, specifications and cost and quantity estimates. Construction-drawings will be prepared in ink, using AutoCad-Rel. 12 in conformance with City of Temecula standards on 24-inch by 36-inch mylar at a scale of one- inch equals forty feet horizontal (1"=40') and one inch equals four feet (1" =4') vertical. Storm Task 2.4 70% Design Meeting ($315) Descril~fion drain profiles shall include necessary hydraulic information. Specifications will incorporate City of Temecula standard specifications and provisions for street design, drainage and' culvert improvements, slope protection and ero- sion control using the City's boiler plat contract documents. Meet with the City of Temecula's project en- gineer to review project progress. Seventy percent (70%) submittal shall include horizon- tal/vertical alignment for both road and storm drain improvements. Easement documents and draft specifications shall also be submitted. Phase Three PS & E Approval and Project Bidding 3.1 Agency. Coor- dination/Plan Completion ($560) Receive agency comments and complete construction drawings, easements and permis- sion letters. 3.2 90% Design Meeting ($315) Meet with City of Temecula's project engineer to review progress. Ninety percent (90%) submittal shall include complete set of plans and specifications and estimates. 3.3 100% Submittal Upon acceptance and approval of the final P.S. & E., NBS/Lowry will provide the City with the following: · One set of survey notes on 8-1/2" x 11" NBS/Lowry logo paper. · Original copies of all permits and clearances, letters of permission, legal documents and plats. NB~OVQrRy 3.4 Task Project Bidding ($420) Description One set of completed original construction drawing mylars, in ink, signed by a California Registered Civil Engineer. Camera-ready master set of specifications, in hard copy and digital format for WordPerfect 5.1. · One set of all studies and reports related to design. recommendations. · One set of AutoCad file disks of the construc- tion drawings. Be available to answer questions during bid and issue addenda. 3.5 Reimbusible Costs ($700 budget) Plan reproduction, mileage, photocopying, etc. NB~EOWRy EXHIBIT "B" PAYMENT SCHEDULE SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT 'B" EXHIBIT "B" r. Ua.wick~nonb..er/dp NB WRy P.r...nF_ ~ RTRZBIT uBu SCHEDULE OF ElfedhsJaly 1, 1993 tq*:eerbrJPka-bt $:niof rdnc~l I'dndpat EngmNf/Iqonmr Sep~or En~m/Plmner EngiamjT~nnl Assis~ Er~.~/Mama HOURLY BILLING RATES $135.00 Senira I)e~gnw 115.00 hs~Qner t'LQO 5w~of ~ 85.00 ~ 70.00 [nginmb',g TedmidQn 55.00 S70.00 65.0o 55.00 45.00 40.00 tlLLD Coastadieu I qe,.,lyt rdncipot Efigineef./Coreslfudion Senior (~gin,r/Co,~tmctio, bsideat Engieeer,/Conslr~'fien EI~ Ansisee Conm'uc~m bgineer Insped~ 2.8xhtcrSokq. 2.8 x Ohd ~ay 2.8 x IXmd SQIQ~ 2.Bxm,,~ 2.8 x DiM Sd~y S95.00 85.00 7O.O0 45.00 175.0(] 140.00 .50/Mile SLRVI([5 AND [XPLINSL5 System s Anoiys't/Sr Fienoel Armlyst S85.00 Pm~mmmm/Finoncid Anc~st Se~r Tschnkian 55.00 TechnKtea 45.00 ExKvfWe SecremW/Admin Assbrunt 45.00 SectsroW 4O.QO WaKI P~esseT/Cled~OificeAib S5.O0 ~inh'ame C0nned Timl irakStmage (hrMb) Reeds: (525.1X3 ,V, mimum) Crd Time Other Expense S3O .O0/H~, lO.O0/!tm 15.SO/Ne,m .OZ/L .SO/S,c~ -.1olcow .32I~ aCost Cosl.+ 15~ Billing ;as i.dgde overhead and me subject to q .nfh year dn M uemn iKngainhg qRements onf[ cost of Ihing inmase. A into pr/ment FINANCE CHARGE will h O.:P~.~ m any Imt;Qid bdoaa, cmmncing tki~y (SO) dWs ;far 'the dm of ~he qlaei invoke, 'Of fill meadmum lutelest role oillied lW low. NBSIL 3-01 TOTi::L P. O2 ITEM NO. 9 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY~~ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Mary Jane McLarney, Finance Officer DATE: April 26, 1994 SUBJECT: Appropriation of Funds for Pechanga Settlement RECOMMENDATION: To approve the appropriation of funds in the amount of $17,500 from the Temecula Redevelopment Agency fund balance to account 280-199-802-5700. DISCUSSION: The settlement agreement and release for Pechanga v. City of Temecule regarding the Dendy property located at the Northwest Sports Complex states that the City of Temecula is to pay $17,500 to the Pechanga Reservation and California Indian Legal Services. This payment is to be made within thirty (30) days of the execution of the document. The document was signed by Mayor Roberts on April 6, 1994. Therefore, payment iS due by May 6, 1994. B'eT'F.~ AGM~'~Lr~i,~ ~1~ RRT.RZ~BR ~-iS Settlement Agreement and ~e~esse (~e ~e~en~) is made effective as of M~ 1, 1994, by and ~tween the Pechanga Indian Rese~ation, T~ecula Band of Luiseno Mission Indians ("Pechanga Rese~ation-), and ~e City of Temecula ("City"), (hereafter collectively "Pa~ies"). ~~S, Pechanga Rese~at~on filed a First ~ended Petition for Writ of ~ndate and Complaint for Injectire Relief against the City in ~e action entitled Pechanua Tndian Reservation. Temecu~a mand of T.-iseno Mission Tndians v. The City of Teme~a. et al. (Riverside Superior Co~t Case No. 234348) (the "Litigation"). ~~S, Pechanga Rese~ation's First ~ended Petition for Writ of Mandate and Complaint for Injunctive Relief sought; inter alia, to invalidate the Notice of Ex~ption for T~porary Event Pemit No. PA93-0039 issued by Defendant City of Temecula ("City") to Donald Shoemaker on April 20, 1993 for a motor sports park (hereinafter referred to as the "Project"). -Included wi~in the Project area is the archaeological resource area kno~ as "Riv 237." ~~S, on J~e 2, 1993, ~e Honorable Charles S. Field, Judge of~e Riverside Co~ty Superior Court, issued a minute order granting Pechanga Rese~ation's re~est for prelimina~injunction, 104~67.AOT 1 !o4~7A~r setting aside the City's Notice of Exemption associated with Temporary Event Permit No. PA93-0039. Following the Court's Order on June 2, 1993, the City and Donald Shoemaker met with representatives of the Pechanga Reservation, at which time the parties reached an agreement whereby the races would be moved off the Riv-237 site and held at a nearby non-sensitive location. WHEREAS, the City then conducted an Initial Study under CEQA of the proposed Project at the new location. The City's Initial Study included obtaining a comprehensive report from Dr. Chris Drover, archaeologist, regarding his archaeological investigation of both the old motocross site and the proposed new site. As a result of Dr. Drover's investigation, the project was modified to avoid the archaeologically sensitive areas and the race track was rerouted. Further, a fenced-off one hundred foot (100') "buffer zone" between the new race track site and the Riv-237 area was created by the City and Donald Shoemaker to avoid disturbance to the resource area. WHEREAS, on August 2,.1993, the City's Planning Commission approved the issuance of Conditional Use Permit No. PA-93-0125 to Donald Shoemaker for the remaining races. The City's Conditions of Approval for the project were approved by the Pechanga Reservation, through their counsel, at the Commission's meeting. WHEREAS, Conditional Use Permit No. PA-93-0125 is outside the scope of the Litigation and this Agreement. WHEREAS, the Parties desire to resolve the disputes among themselves in the Litigation. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above recitals and the mutual promises set forth herein, the Parties hereby agree as follows: 1. D~sbursement a. Within thirty (30) business days after execution of. this Settlement Agreement, the City shall pay to Pechanga Reservation and its attorneys of record, California Indian Legal Services, the sum of Seventeen Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($17,500.00). b. The Parties agree that the above sum represents the total amount of attorneys' fees and costs associated with the Litigation and the negotiation and execution of this Settlement Agreement incurred by Pechanga Reservation. 2. D~smissals and Releases After'the execution of-this Settlement Agreement, Pechanga Reservation shall execute and deliver to counsel for City, a Request for Dismissal with Prejudice of the Complaint in its entirety, for filing, An exchange for the disbursement of funds as provided in Paragraph 1 (a) above. City shall not file the Request for Dismissal until the funds have been delivered to the Pechanga lo4.~67.Aar Reservation ' s services. attorneys of record, California Indian Legal Notice of ~,t-re T~na Ume A~rov~.18 a. 'The City agrees that in any future plans for development on Assessor's Parcels No. 909-120-018 and No. 909-120- 014 which involve any kind of land use, grading or building permit issued by the City within one (1) year from the date this Settlement Agreement is signed, the City shall provide timely written notice of the proposed development to the Pechanga Tribal Council, P.O. Box 1477, Temecula, CA 92593 and to California IndianLegal Services, 120 West Grand Avenue, Suite 204, Escondido, CA 92025. Such written notice shall fairly describe the proposed development and identify the responsible City official(s) to be contacted for further information. b. The option to renew the above notice requirement for additional one (1) year periods shall be exercised by the Pechanga Reservation by filing a written request for such notice with the City Clerk of the City, no later than February let of each year. c. Both of the Parties do hereby acknowledge, understand, and agree t hat the sole remedy for breach of the notice requirements by the City is injunctive relief and that the City shall not be responsible or liable for any damages, including attorney's fees, related to any such breach. 4 4. Re~e~ee a. The Parties, and each of them, hereby release and forever discharge each other hereunder and, where applicable, each of their respective parents; subsidiaries; officers; directors; associates; predecessors; successors; heirs; assigns; agents; partners; employees; insurers; representatives; lawyers; and all persons acting by, through, under or in concert with them, or any of them, of and from any and all manner of action or actions, cause or causes of action, in law or in equity, suits, debts, liens, contracts, agreements, promises, liabilities, claims, demands, damages, losses, costs or expenses, of any nature whatsoever, known or unknown, fixed or contingent (hereinafter called sClaims-), which the Parties now have or may hereafter have against each other, or any of them, by reason of any matter, cause or thing arising out of, based upon, or.relating to the Litigation. b. THE PARTIES ACKNOWLEDGE AND AGREE THAT THEY HAVE BEEN ADVISED BY THEIR LEGAL COUNSEL AND ARE FAMILIAR WITHTHE PROVISIONS OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL CODE SECTION 1542, WHICH PROVIDES AS FOLLOWS: "A GENERAL RELEASE DOES NOT EXTEND TO CLAIMS WHICH THECREDITOR DOES NOTKNOW'OR SUSPECTTO EXIST IN HIS FAVOR AT THE TIME OF EXECUTING THE RELEASE, WHICH IF KNOWN BY HIM MUST HAVE MATERI~r~ AFFECTED HIS 'SETTLEMENT WITH THE DEBTOR. m THE 'PARTIES BEING AWARE OF SAID CODE' SECTION, HEREBY EXPRESSLY WAIVE ANY I~GHTS THEYrAND EACH OF ~IEM, MAY HAVE THEREUNDER, AS WELL AS UNDER ANY OTHER STATUTES OR COMMON LAW PRINCIPLES OF SIMILAR EFFECT, EXCEPT AS TO THOSE RIGHTS EXPRESSLY RESERVED IN THIS S~AGREEMENT. c. The Parties, and each of them, represent and warrant that there has been no assignment or other transfer of any interest in any Claim which they, or any of them, may have against each other, and the Parties agree to indemnify and hold each other harmless from any liabilities,. Claims, demands, damages, costs, expenses, and attorneys' fees incurred by the parties as a. result of any person asserting any such assignment or transfer. It is the intention of the Parties that this indemnity does not require payment as a condition precedent to recovery by any of the Parties against the others, or any of them, under this indemnity. d. The Parties agree that if they, or any one of them, hereafter.commence, join in, or in any manner seek relief through any suit arising out of, based upon, or relating to any of the Claims released hereunder, or in any manner 'assert against any other Party any of the Claims released hereunder,' then the responsible Parties, and each of them, shall pay to the other Parties, in addition to any other damages caused to the other 6 Parties thereby, all attorneys' fees incurred by the other Parties in defending or otherwise responding to said suit or Claims. e. This release shall not operate to release any claims the Parties may hereafter have for the enforcement of the obligation created by the Agreement. 5. Non~a~J~on of All Parties understand and agree that neither the payment of any sum of money nor the execution of this Agreement shall constitute or be construed as an admission of any liability whatsoever by any of the Parties. 6. ~fO~Ce~htl~ty This Agreement'shall not b e subject to attack on the ground that any or all of the legal theories or factual assumptions used for negotiating purposes are for any reason inaccurate or inappropriate. 7. Construction of Agreement This Agreement shall be construed as a whole in · accordance with its fair meaning and in accordance with the laws of the State of California. The language of the Agreement shall not be construed for or against any particular Party. used here are for reference only and shall not construction of this Agreement. The headings affect the 8. Role A-re~ent a. This Agreement represents the sole and entire agreement between the Parties end supersedes all prior agreements, negotiations, and discussions between the Parties hereto and/or counsel with respect to the subject matters their respective covered hereby. Any amendment to the Agreement must be in writing signed by duly authorized representatives of the Parties hereto and stating the intent of the Parties to amend this Agreement. c. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original, and shall be effective upon the signature and agreement of all of the' Parties. 9. Warranty of Authority The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the Pechanga Reservation warrants and represents that he/they has/have the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Pechanga Reservation and the individual members 'of the Pechanga Reservation and warrants and represents that he/they has/have the authority to bind the Pechanga. Reservation and the individual members of the Pechanga Reservation to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. 8 IN WITNESSWHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Settlement Agreement and Release on the dates indicated below, effective as of the first date written above. PECHANGA INDIAN RESERVATION TEMECULA BAND OF LUI S ENO INDIANS MISSION APPROVED AS TO FORM: CALIFORNIA INDIAN LEGAL SERVICES Attorneys for Pechanga Indian Reservation, Temecula Band of Luiseno Mission Indians 9 CITY OF TEMECULA: By Ron Rober~s, Mayor Dated ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSEN Scott F. F~eld'l, City Attorney City of Temecula Dated l o~ ~67 A crr 10 ITEM NO. 10© CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT APPROVAT. CITY ATTORNEY~ FINANCE OFFIC CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Manager/City Council Mary Jane McLarney, Finance Officer April 26, 1994 Financial Advisory Services for Issuance of Industrial Development Bonds RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the financial advisory services of Fieldman, Rolapp & Associates relating to the proposed relocation/expansion Of Tension Envelope to Temecula and authorize the City Manager and City Clerk to execute a contract. DISCUSSION: Fieldman, Rolapp & Associates was selected to serve as the City's financial advisor through an RFP process in connection with the issuance of the Temecula Community Services District end Redevelopment Agency bonds. Due to the short time schedule requested by Tension Envelope, Inc. for issuance of their Industrial Development Bonds staff recommends using Fieldman, Rolapp & Associates to serve as financial advisor. The scope of services is included on pages 2 through 5 of the attachment. FISCAL IMPACT: The cost of the services will be included in the bond issue and will be borne by Tension Envelope, Inc. Attachment: Scope. of Services document from Fieldman, Rolapp & Associates PRINCIPALS WILLIAM L. FIELDMAN THOMAS G. JOHNSEN R. MICHAEL MCNAMARA LAWRENCE G. ROLAPP SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA OFFICE 2100 S. E. MAIN STREET SECOND FLOOR IRVINE, CA 92714 714e660e8500 FAX 714e474e8773 March 28, 1994 Mary Jane McLarney, Finance Director CITY OF TEMECULA 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 Pieldman, Rolapp & Associates. INDEPENDI~NT FINANCIAL ADVISORS TO LC)CAL G()VERN~.tF.N7 ORIGINAL NORTHERN CALIFORNIA OFFICE 510-933,6096 FAX 510o933=6098 CHARTER MEMBER ONAL ASSOCIATION eNDEPENDENT PUBLIC FINANCi ADVISORS Financial Advisory Services FRA Project No.94223 Dear Mary Jane: Pursuant to your request, Fieldman, Rolapp & Associates is pleased to submit this letter agreement (the "Agreement") to the City of Temecula (the "City") for municipal financial advisory services to be performed in conjunction with the funding of the proposed relocation/expansion of Tension Envelope in Temecula (the "Project"). We understand that the funding of the Project will be accomplished with the proceeds of Industrial Development Bonds (the "Bonds ") to be issued by the City. We have extensive experience in handling this type of assignment. We offer to assist the City in a financial advisory capacity by utilizing and making available to you the research, statistical, and consultant staff of our organization to such extent as may be necessary and helpful. Ms. Katrina Heller, assisted by Mr. David Glasser and staff, will be directly responsible for providing financial advisory services to the City. Our firm acts strictly in an advisory capacity. We do not underwrite nor do we place securities. We are independent financial advisors and charter members of the National Association of Independent Public Finance Advisors. Our-approach is to provide objective advice on a fee for service basis and develop the most cost effective approach for our clients. SCOPE OF SERVICES We agree to provide the following advisory services in connection with any and all financing requirements as they pertain to the Project: I. Preliminary Survey We will confer with City staff, bond counsel, consultants, and other interested parties for the purpose of making a preliminary survey of the Project and to assist in the formulation of a coordinated plan to fund the Project. H. Attendance at Public Meetisis/Conferences We will attend meetings concerning the Project when deemed necessary and, in addition, be available to attend meetings and conferences to explain the effects of the proposed financing. IH. Consultation/Advice We will be available for consultation and advice. IV. Work Sessiom and Seminars We will be available to conduct and/or participate in work sessions and seminars, which may be held to discuss the Project and methods of public financing. Phase II services will commence upon appropriate action of the City directing the sale of the contemplated Bonds. Phase I services shall be deemed completed upon commencement of Phase H services. We will perform the following additional services in conjunction with the marketing of the debta). I. Municipal Securities Mm'ket Furnish the City with information concerning current municipal securities market conditions and make recommendations as to the technical details of the financing, including maturity schedules, funds, covenants, redemption futures, and other details (/) For purposes of this Agreement, debt and/or "Bonds" means Bonds, Certificates of Participation, Short-term Notes, Bond AnticOxttion Notes, Grant AnticOxuion Notes, derivative products or other evidence of indebtedness. -2- which will, in our opinion, make the proposed ~nan~ing most acceptable to prospective purchasers and, therefore, marketable at the lowest possible interest rate. Sale of Bonds At the direction of the City either assist in negotiating the sale of the contemplated Bonds or, assist the City in calling for competitive bids. A. N~otiated Sale If it is detamined to sell the Bonds by negotiated sale, we will: Selection of Undme'iters. Assist the City in. the seleaion of a qualified underwriter whose reputation, financial strength, and experience will best serve the interests of the City. Consultation/Advice. Attend any meetings concerning the Project when deemed necessary and, in addition, be available for consultation and advice with such time as all Bonds to finance the Project have been sold and thereafter upon request. N~l, otiatod Sale of Bonds. Assist the City in negotiating the sale of the contemplated Bonds to the underwriter selected and make appropriate recommendations to the City. Financial Review of Documents. Review the financial aSpects of all documents relating to the marketing of the proposed Bonds including any Official Statement or Disclosure Document and Bond Purchase Agreement. Due Dili~,ence Meetinl,. When a due diligence meeting is held, we will participate in such due diligence meeting and assist the City in the examination of pertinent financial data. Multiple Sales/Securil,y Review and Services to be Provided. In the event the authorized Bonds' are sold in more than one sale, we will review the financial terms and conditions of each offering to determine to what extent, if any, there is an impact on the security of each series of Bonds and we will provide services for eoch series of Bonds in accordance with this section. B. Sealed Competitive Bids If it is determined to sell the Bonds at sealed competitive bid, we will perform the following services: Official Statement. Accumulate and compile inw an Official Statement economic, financial, and statistical data pertaining to the proposed financing, which Official Statement shall be prepared on the City's behalf and will be satisfactory to the' City. The Official Statement will include the Notice of Sale. -3- Due Dili/enee MeOinl, s. Prior to the production and distribution of any Official Statement, the City agrees to h01d a due diligence meeting(s) to verify the accuracy of the data contained in the Official Statement and make full disclosure of all pertinent information concerning the economy and finances of the City. We will participate in such due diligence meeting(s) and assist the City in the examination of pertinent financial data. 3. Production of Official Statement. Under the supervision of the City, cause to produce said Official Statement. 4. Distribution of Official Statement. Distribute copies of the Official Statement to municipal securities underwriters. Updatiw, of Official Ststement. In the event the authorized financing is sold in more than one sale of Bonds, we will update and distribute copies of the revised Official Statement. Comultation/Adviee. Attend any meetings concerning the Project when deemed necessary and, in addition, be available for consultation and advice until such time as the Bonds to finance the Project have been sold and thereafter upon request. Contact of Bond Underwriters. Make direct contact with a select number of municipal securities underwriters in an effort to stimulate bidding on the Bonds. THE BOND BUYER Ad. Place an advertisement in THE BOND BUYER announcing the offering of the Bonds prior to the time bids are received for such issue. Attendance at Bid Opening,. Attend meetings of the City at which bids for the Bonds are received for the purpose of assisting in the computation and evaluation of such bids. If deemed desirable, work with recognized rating service(s) in an attempt to obtain an advantageous rating of the Bonds to be issued. IV. Insurance/Credit Facility If deemed desirable, we will assist the City in obtaining a letter of credit from a rated institution, a municipal bond insurance policy or other credit facility providing for guaranteed payment oi~ principal and interest on the Bonds. V. Attendance at C!osin[, We will compute closing figures, including accrued interest, and assist bond counsel in coordinating events of the closing. If a competitive sale is conducted, the City agrees to furnish the successful bidder, at the closing, a coni~cate, signed by the appropriate officials of the City, acting in their official capacity, to the effect that to the best of their knowledge and belief, and after reasonable investigation, a) neither the Official Statement nor any amendment or supplement thereto contains any untrue statement of a material fact or omits to state any material fact necessary in order to make the statements therein, in light of the circumstances in which they were m~d_e, not misleading; b) since the date of the Official Statement, no event has occurred which should have been set forth in such an amendment or supplement; nor c) has there been any material adverse change in the operation or financing affairs of the City since the date of such Official Statement. I. Investm4~t of Proceeds We will assist the City to arrange the investment of proceeds of the Bonds. This includes soliciting proposals from various investment service providers. H. Additional Work If the City desires additional work beyond the scope of this Agreement, it will be performed 'when authorized on a time and material expense basis in accordance with our then current fee schedule. -5- For all services to be rendered under Phases I and H of this agreement resulting in a negotiated sale of Bonds hereunder, the City will pay us a fee of Thirty Two Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($32,500). For all services to be rendered under Phases I and H of this agreement resulting in a competitive sale of the Bonds hereunder, the City will pay us a fee of Thirty Nine Thousand Five Hundred ($39,500). For all Phase HI services, the City will pay us on an hourly basis pursuant to our then current hourly fee schedule (see attn_ched Schedule "A" of current hourly fee schedule). However, if we are requested to execute a closing certificate relative to disclosure adequacy of either the preliminary or final official statement, we will be paid an additional lump sum fee of Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000) at the closing. The City will reimburse us for usual and customary out-of-pocket expenses, including, but not limited to, the cost of producing and distributing or updating .the Official Statement, costs of financial advertising and costs incurred in connection with travel if such travel is necessary in the furtherance of the Project and is authorized by the City. In connection with such travel, it may be that we will be called on to advance the costs of airfare, hotel accommodations, meals, and other related expenses incurred on behalf of the Project. It is understood that such advances will be considered as an advance to the City and not to any Agency official. Any advances shall be reimbursed to us within thirty (30) days after expenses are incurred. If the financing transaction closes within thirty (30) days after expenses are incurred, then expenses may be paid from the proceeds. District officials may be required to report any advances which are not reimbursed within thirty (30) days of expenditures on their ~nmicial disclosures statements. In addition, if it is possible to obtain a rating on the Bonds from Standard & Poor's Corporation and/or Moody's Investor Service and/or other rating service and/or if municipal bond insurance is available, the City agrees to pay for the costs of such rating and insurance unless it is determined that the cost of insurance shall be borne by the underwriter at the bidder's option. Payment for all services under Phases I and II of this agreement rendered and expenses incurred pursuant to this Agreement shall be paid at the closing. In the event of abandonment of the Project, abandonment fees shall be due and payable immediately after such abandonment. Hourly fees shall be due and payable monthly. In the event the Project is abandoned prior to the completion of financing, the City agrees to pay us a fee equal to the reasonable value of services rendered from the date of this Agreement to the date of abandonment Reasonable value for our services shall be determined by using our hourly rates in effect at the time of such abandonment, plus reimbursement for usual and customary out-of-pocket expenses. Attached hereto is Schedule "A" of our hourly rates in effect as of the date of this Agreement. This Agreement shall remain in full forco and effect until the financing contemplated herein has been completed or the Project is abandoned, whichever first occurs. It is expressly understood that this Agreement does not intend to and is not under any circumstances to be construed as requiring us to perform any services which constitute the practice of law; we are employed in an expert financial advisory capacity only. It is expressly understood that this Agreement does not intend to and is not under any circumstances to be construed as requiring the Consultant to perform any services which constitute the practice of law; the Consultant is employed in an expert financial advisory capacity only. It is further understood that the Consultant will not be requested to participate in, render an opinion or make any representation regarding full disclosure of matters which should or should not be included in the official statement, the adequacy of the source of repayment, investment of proceeds or the financial feasibility of the "Project". The City, landowners, developers, consultants and other.parties dealing with the City or involved in the Project will be furnishing to us various data, reports, studies, computer print-outs and other information and representations as to the facts involved in the Project which the City understands we will be using and relying upon in preparing the reports, studies, computer print-outs and other work products. We shall not be obligated to establish or verify the accuracy of the information furnished by or on behalf of the City, nor shall we be responsible for the impact or effect on its work products of the information furnished by or on behalf of the City, in the event that such information is in error and therefore introduces error into our work products. -7- If the foregoing Agreement is satisfactory to you, please take appropriate action to authorize its acceptance by signing and returning the original copy hereof. Respectfully submitted, ,FIE!.IIMAN, ROLAPP & ASSOCIATES Lawrence G. Rolapp ~ ~ President/Managing Principal LGR/tfd Executed on beh~f of the City of Temeculathis__ 1994. day of Title: Date: -8- SCHEDUI-i~-"A"' $175 Per Hour* Vice President $150 Per Hour Assistant Vice President $130 Pet- Hour Senior Associate $9~ Per Hour Associate $8~ Per Hour Administrative Assistant Per Hour Secretarial Staff $25 Per Hour *The rate for the Managing Principal will be $225.00 per hour. -9- PRINCIPALS WILLIAM L. FIELDMAN THOMAS G. JOHNSEN R. MICHAEL MCNAMARA LAWRENCE G. ROLAPP SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA OFFICE 2100 S. E. MAIN STREET SECOND FLOOR IRVINE, CA 92714 7140660eB500 FAX 714e474e8773 March 28, 1994 Mary Jane McLarney, Finance Director CITY OF TEMECULA 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92,590 Fieldman, Rolapp & Associates INDEPENDENT FINANCIAL ADVISORS T() LOCAL G()\,'ERN~4ENT DUPLICATE NORTHERN CALIFORNIA OFFICE 510,933,6096 FAX 510,933,6098 CHARTER MEMBER qONAL ASSOCIATION ~Jr INDEPENDENT PUBLIC FINANCE ADVISORS Financial Advisory Services FRA Project No.94223 Dear Mary Jane: Pursuant to your request, Fieldman, Rolapp & Associates is pleased to submit this letter agreement (the "Agreement") to the City of Temecula (the "City") for municipal financial advisory services to be performed in conjunction with the funding of the proposed relocation/expansion of Tension Envelope in Temecula (the "Project"). We understand that the funding of the Project will be accomplished with the proceeds of Industrial Development Bonds (the "Bonds") to be issued by the City. We have extensive experience in handling this type of assignment. We offer to assist the City in a financial advisory capacity by utilizing and making available to you the research, statistical, and consultant staff of our organization to such extent as may be necessary and helpful. Ms. Katrina Heller, assisted by Mr. David Glasser and staff, will be directly responsible for providing financial advisory services to the City. Our firm acts strictly in an advisory capacity. We do not underwrite nor do we place securities. We are independent financial advisors and charter members of the National Association of Independent Public Finance Advisors. Our .approach is to provide objective advice on a fee for service basis and develop the most cost effective approach for our clients. SCOPE OF SERVICES We agree to provide the following advisory services in connection with any and all financing requirements as they pertain to the Project: I. Preliminory Survey We will confer with City staff, bond counsel, consultants, and other interested parties for the purpose of making a preliminary survey of the Project and to assist in the formulation of a coordinated plan to fund the Project. H. Attendance at Public Meetinl~/Conferences We will attend meetings concerning the Project when deemed necessary and, in addition, be available to attend meetings and conferences to explain the effects of the proposed financing. HI. Consultation/Advice We will be available for consultation and advice. IV. Work Sessions and Seminars We will be available to conduct and/or participate in work sessions and seminars, which may be held to discuss the Project and methods of public financing. Phase II services will commence upon appropriate action of the City directing the sale of the contemplated Bonds. Phase I services shall be deemed completed upon commencement of Phase II services. We will perform the following additional services in conjunction with.the marketing of the debta). I. Municipal Securities Market Furnish the City with information concerning current municipal securities market conditions and make recommendations as to the technical details of the financing, including maturity schedules, funds, covenants, redemption features, and other details (1) For purposes of this Agreement, debt and/or "Bonds' means Bonds, Certificates of Participation, · ~hon-term Notes, Bond Anticipation Notes, Grant Anticipation Notes, derivative products or other evidence of indebtedness. -2- which will, in our opinion, make the proposed financing most acceptable to prospective purchasers and, therefore, marketable at the lowest possible interest rate. H. S~e of Bonds At the direction of the City either assist in negotiating the sale of the contemplated Bonds or, assist the City in calling for competitive bids. A. Nofotiated Sale If it is determined to sell the Bonds by negotiated sale, we will: Selection of Underwriters. Assist the City in the selection of a qualified underwriter whose reputation, financial strength, and experience will best serve the interests of the City. Consultation/Advice. Attend any meetings concerning the Project when deemed necessary and, in addition, be available for consultation and advice with such time as all Bonds to finance the Project have been sold and thereafter upon request. N~otiated Sale of Bonds. Assist the City in negotiating the sale of the contemplated Bonds to the underwriter selected and make appropriate recommendations to the City. Financial Review of Docummts. Review the financial aspects of all documents relating to the marketing of the proposed Bonds including any Official Statement or Disclosure Document and Bond Purchase Agreement. Due Diligence Meetinf. When a due diligence meeting is held, we will participate in such due diligence meeting and assist the City in the examination of pertinent financial data. Multiple Sales/Security Review and Services to be Provided. In the event the authorized Bonds'are sold in more than one sale, we will review the financial terms and conditions of each offering to determine to what extent, if any, there is an impact on the security of each series of Bonds and we will provide services for each series of Bonds in accordance with this section. B. Sealed Competitive Bids If it is determined to sell the Bonds at sealed competitive bid, we' will perform 'the following services: Official Statement. Accumulate and compile into an Official Statement economic, financial, and statistical data pertaining to the proposed financing, which Official Statement shall be prepared on the City's behalf and will be satisfactory to the City. The Official Statement will include the Notice of Sale. -3- Due Diligea~ Meefr~,. Prior to the production and distribution of any Official Statement, the City agrees to hold a due diligence meeting(s) to verify the accuracy of the data contained in the Official Statement and make full disclosure of all pertinent information concerning the economy and finances of the City. We will participate in such due diligence meeting(s) And assist the City in the examination of pertinent financial data. 3. Production of Official Statement. Under the supervision of the City, cause to produce said Official Statement. 4. Distribution of Official Statement. Distribute copies of the Official Statement to municipal securities underwriters. Updating of Official Statement. In the event the authorized financing is sold in more than one sale of Bonds, we will update and distribute copies of the revised Official Statement. Consultation/Advice. Attend any meetings concerning the Project when deemed necessary and, in addition, be available for consultation and advice until such time as the Bonds to finance the Project have been sold and thereafter upon request. Contact of Bond Underwriters. Make direct 'contact with a select number of municipal securities underwriters in an effort to stimulate bidding on the Bonds. ~ BOND BIYYgR Ad. Place an advertisement in THE BOND BUYER announcing the offering of the Bonds prior to the time bids are received for such issue. Attendance at Bid Opening. Attend meetings of the City at which bids for the Bonds are received for the purpose of assisting in the computation and evaluation of such bids. If deemed desirable, work with recognized rating service(s) in an attempt to obtain an advantageous rating of the Bonds to be issued. IV. Insurance/Credit Facility If deemed desirable, we will assist the City in obtaining a letter of credit from a rated institution, a municipal bond insurance policy or other credit facility providing for guaranteed payment of principal and interest on the Bonds. V. Attendance at Closing We will compute closing figures, including accrued interest, and assist bond counsel in coordinating events of the closing. If a competitive sale is conducted, the City agrees to furnish the successful bidder, at the closing, a certificate, signed by the appropriate officials of the City, acting in their official capacity, to the effect that to the best of their knowledge and belief, and after reasonable investigation, a) neither the Official Statement nor any amendment or supplement thereto contains any untrue statement of a material fact or omits to state any material fact necessary in order to make the statements therein, in light of the circumstances in which they were made, not misleading; b) sinco the date of the Official Statement, no event has occurred which should have.been set forth in such an amendment or supplement; nor c) has there been any material adverse change in the operation or financing affairs of the City since the date of such Official Statement. I. Investment of Proceeds We will assist the City to mange the investment of proceeds of the Bonds. This includes soliciting proposals from various investment service providers. H. Additional Work If the City desires additional work beyond the scope of this Agreement, it' will be performed when authorized on a time and material expense basis in accordance with our then current fee schedule. -5- For all services to be rendered under Phases I and II of this agreement resulting in a negotiated sale of Bonds hereunder, the City will pay us a fee of Thirty Two Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($32,500). For all services to be rendered under Phases I and H of this agreement resulting in a competitive sale of the Bonds hereunder, the City will pay us a fee of Thirty Nine Thousand Five Hundred ($39,500). For all Phase HI services, the City will pay us on an hourly basis pursuant to our then current hourly fee schedule (see attached Schedule "A" of current hourly fee schedule). However, if we are requested to execute a closing certificate relative to disclosure adequacy of either the preliminary or final official statement, we will be paid an additional lump sum fee of Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000) at the closing. The City will reimburse us for usual and customary Out-of-pocket expenses, including, but not limited-to~ the cost of producing and distributing or updating the Official Statement, .costs of financial advertising and costs incurred in connection with travel if such travel is necessary in the furtherance of the Project and is authorized by the City. In connection with such travel, it may be that we will be called on to advance the costs of airfare, hotel accommodations, meals, and other related expenses incurred on behalf of the Project. It is understood that such advances will be considered as an advance to the City and not to any Agency official. Any advances shall be reimbursed to us within thirty (30) days after expenses are incurred. If the financing transaction closes within thirty (30) days after expenses are incurred, then expenses may be paid from the proceeds. District officials may be required to report any advances which are not reimbursed within thirty (30) days of expenditures on their financial disclosures statements. In addition, if it is possible to obtain a rating on the Bonds from Standard & Poor's Corporation and/or Moody's Investor Service and/or other rating service and/or if municipal bond insurance is available, the City agrees to pay for the costs of such rating and insurance unless it is determined that the cost of insurance shall be borne by the underwriter at the bidder's option. Payment for all services under Phases I and H of this agreement rendered and expenses incurred pursuant to this Agreement shall be paid at the closing. In the event of abandonment of the Project, abandonment fees shall be due and payable immediately after such abandonment. Hourly fees shall be due and payable monthly. In the event the Project is abandoned prior to the completion of financing, the City agrees to pay us a fee equal to the reasonable value of services rendered from the date of this Agreement to the date of abandonment Reasonable value for our services. shall be determined by using our hourly rates in effect at the time of such abandonment, 'plus reimbursement for usual and customary out-of-pOcket expenses. Attached hereto is Schedule "A" of our hourly rates in effect as of the date of this Agreement. I This Agreement shall remain in full force and effect until the financing contemplated herein has been completed or the Project is abandoned, whichever first occurs. = :== ~=: i~DmON~:~=.~= ~ =: :~ = It is expressly understood that this Agreement does not intend to and is not under any circumstances to be construed as requiring us to perform any services which constitute the practice of law; we are employed in an export financial advisory capacity only. It is expressly understood that this Agreement does not intend to and is not under any circumstances to be construed as requiring the Consultant to porform any services which constitute the practice of law; the Consultant is employed in an expert financial advisory capacity only. It is further understood that the Consultant will not be requested to participate in, render an opinion or make any representation regarding full disclosure of matters which should or should not be included in the official statement, the adequacy of the source of repayment, investment of proceeds or the financial feasibility of the "Project". The City, landowners, developers, consultants and other parties dealing with the City or involved in the Project will be furnishing to us various data, reports, studies, computer print-outs and other information and representations as to the facts involved in the Project which the City understands we will be using and relying upon in preparing the reports, studies, computer print-outs and other work products. We shall not be obligated to establish or verify the accuracy of the information furnished by or on behalf of the City, nor shall we be responsible for the impact or effect on its work products of the information furnished by or on behalf of the City, in the event that such information is in error and therefore introduces error into our work products. -7- If the foregoing Agreement is satisfactory to you, please take appropriate action to authorize its acceptance by signing and returning the original copy hereof. Respectfully submitted, ~,FIELrsMAN, ROLAPP & ASSOCIATES Lawrence G. Rolapp ~ \ President/Managing Principal LGR/tfd Executed on behalf of the City of Temecula this __ 1994. day of Title: Date: -8- SCHEDUI~ "A" Principals of the Firm $175 Per Hour* Vice President $150 Per Hour Assistant Vice President $130 Per Hour Senior Associate $95 Per Hour Associate $85 Per Hour Administrative Assistant $45 Per Hour Secretarial Staff $25 Per Hour *The rate for the Managing Principal will be $225. OO per hour. -9- ITEM NO. I 1 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council City Clerk June Greek April 26, 1994 California Parks and Wildlife Bond Act (CALPAW '94) RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94-__ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ENDORSING THE CALIFORNIA PARKS AND WILDLIFE BOND ACT OF 1994 (CALPAW '94) DISCUSSION: The Executive Committee of the Western Riverside Council of Governments has adopted a resolution endorsing the California Park and Wildlife Bond Act of 1994 known as CALPAW '94, which will appear on the June 1994 ballot as Proposition 108. WRCOG has requested that the member agencies agendize e similar resolution of endorsement to bring this matter to the attention of the local voters. We have prepared a draft resolution (Attachment B) for City Council consideration and adoption. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A - Copy of Resolution 94-1 passed by WRCOG on March 7,' 1994. Attachment B - Draft City Council Resolution 94~_ /-~- R:~egeeda4~t~,N, PAW.94 I ATTACHMENT A C~mmyd~ive~jd~°C~y~nning°C~y~fB~um~nt°C~y~Ca~m~a°C~ydC~n~nLdm°~d~°~d~m~ CJtSs~'4dmlbbeu · CJly of MmVdby · Clly of imvbla · City of Nolo * City of penis · Cily of Rjvemjda * Cily of San Jacinto · CIly of Temeada March 16, 1994 Ms. June Greek, City Clerk City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, California 92590 Dear Ms. Greek: In regular session on March 7, 1994, the Executive Committee of the Western Riverside Council of Governments adopted Resolution 94-1 endorsing the California Park and Wildlife Bond Act of 1994 initiative; a copy of the Resolution is enclosed. Known as C.AI.PAW '94, the initiative will appear as Proposition 108 on the June 1994 California ballot. Our region is among the fastest growing areas in the state...our population is projected to double over the next twenty years, accompanied by rapid urbanization and development. The explosive population increases experienced in our area during the 1980's, along with rapid future growth, puts a strain on many of the areas open space and recreation resources; as well as our native wildlife species and habitats. Under these conditions, WRCOG supports CAt,PAW '94 because its passage will allocate funding to provide needed parks and recreation facilities and a variety of other open space and wildlife programs throughout the greater western Riverside County region for the enhancement and benefit of our respective communities and residents. The CALPAW '94 initiative provides' $ 79 million for allocation to specific projects in the WRCOG region. Our organization recognizes the importance of C.AI-PAW '94 in protecting and enhancing our parks, scenic open spaces, sensitive habitat areas, and historic and cultural sites. Your community.and citizens will also benefit from passage of Prop 108. CALPAW '94 provides funds to every city and county for needed local park and recr~tion facilities, including playgrounds, ball fields, swimming pools and other facilities. Our local cities and park and recreation districts would receive $ 4.7 million in Local Assistan~ Grants through this measure. We would appreciate your agendizing a similar Resolution of Endorsement before your City Council at the earliest convenience. Should you need any assistance or have any questions, please contact Mr. Steve Ruddick of our staff at (909) 787-7948; he will be happy to assist you; or contact Mr. Tim Dunbar- Statewide Campaign Coordinator of the Planning and Conservation League at (916) ~.~.~. 8726. Thank you for your cooperation in this important endeavor. -'AJ.Wiison Secretary of the Executive Committee 3737 Main Street, Suite 420, Riverside, CA 92501 *** (909) 787-7985 *'0 FAX (909) 787-7991 RESOLUTION ~H-1 ~'~ A RESOLUTION OF THE WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS ENDORSING THE CAt,n~ORN/A PARKS AND WTtnt,11~, BOND ACT OF 1994 (CAT-PAW '94) WltEP,.ZAS, the Western Riverside Council of Governments is a Joint Powers Authority agency comprised of the Cities of Banning, Beaumont, Calimesa, Canyon Lake, Corona, Hemet, Lake Elsinore, Moreno Valley, Murrieta, Norco, Perris, Riverside, San Jacinto, Temecula, and the County of Riverside; and, WHEREAS, the Western Riverside Council of Governments fin& that providing park and recreation services is of vital environmental, social and economic interests of the citizens of our communities; and, WHEREAS, a coalition of community and conservation groups, business and labor, historic preservation and other organizations have undemken a volunteer, community-based effort to place a park, recreation and wildlife General Obligation Bond Act on the June, 1994 ballot; and, WHEREAS, passage of the CALPAW '94 Bond Act by the voters will allocate funding to provide needed facilities throughout the greater western Riverside County region for the enhancement of our communities and residents, including local park and recreation facilities, historic preservation projects, hiSdug/jogging/equestrian trails, museums, senior day care and recreational centen, and a wide variety of other open space and wildlife programs; and, WRERE&S, CALPAW '94 also includes funding for at-risk youth facilities' in order to reduce crime, drug activity, and gang violence in our communities; and, WHEREAS, the western Riverside County region will receive an estimated $84 mi. lllon for development of park and recreation facilities, wildlife habitat acquisition, and other purposes if CALPAW '94 is approved by the voters; and, WHEREAS, the following specific pwjects bene~ting our communities are included in the CALPAW '94 Bond Act for the greater western Riverside County region: Designated Projects in the Western Riverside County Region ($79 million) ® Citrus State Historical Park 8 · ® Santa Rosa Phteau 13.5 · ® Shipley Reserve/Cactus Valley S · · Alkaline Plant Habitat 1.5 · · Conservation Demonstration .5 · · Indian Canyon Cultural 4 · · Victoria Avenue Restoration 1 Box Springs 6 Mystic Lake 6 Norco Hills .~9 Sycamore Canyon 1 EsteHe Mountain S Coachella Conservancy 'O · · · · · · · 1994 Bond Act Per Capita Allocations & Roberti-Z'Berg-Harris Block Grants ($4,734,807) (estimate based on 1988 population figures) City of Bnnning $ S3,000 · City of Calimesa To Be Determined · City of Corona $ 226, 17S · City of Hemet $138,700 · City of Lake Elsinore $ 38,000 · City of Moreno Valley $ 392,671 · City of Norco $107,747 · City of Riverside $ 892,884 · City of Temecula To Be Determined · City of Beaumont City of Canyon Lake Beaumont-Cherry Valley RPD Jurupa Area RPD Lake Elsinore RPD City of Muftieta City of Pen'is City of San Jacinto County of Riverside $ 30,000 ToBeDetmninnl $ 57,000 $ 269,846 $ 54,000 ToBeDamnimt $ 37,000 $ 56,998 $2,380,786 WHEREAS, thousands of jobs will be created with passage of this initiative; now, therefore, BE IT RESOLVED that the Western Riverside Council of Governments in regular session on March 7, 1994, does hereby endorse the CALPAW '94 initiative and the specific proposition that contains the measure as it will a~zar on the June 1994 ballot, and supports its passage by the voters of the Cities and County, and the Slate of California; and, BE IT FURTHER RF. SOLVED that the Western Riverside Council of Governments will join vith elected and appointed officials throughout the western Riverside County region in an ongoing effort to educate the residents of our communities about the benefits of the CALPAW '94 initiative when voters consider the proposition as it appears on the June 1994 election ballot. This Resolution shall take effect upon .adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED this March 7, 1994 by the Executive Committee of the Western Riverside Council of Governments. Ceni~o~ - Chair ~-~/A~~ilson - Secretary ATTACHMENT B RF~OLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF TFFE CITY COUNCIL OF THF~ CITY OF T~IECULA ENDORSING TNF~ CAt-wO~ PARKS AND Wrt,DLWE BOND ACT OF 1994 (CALPAW '94) WHEUE&S, the City of Temecula, is a member of Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG), a Joint Powers Authority; and WHEREAS, WP, COG finds that providing park and recreation services is .of vital environmental, social and economic interest to the citizens of the member communities; and WHEREAS, a coalition of community and conservation groups, business and labor, historic preservation and other organizations have undertaken a volunteer, community-based effort to place a park, recreation and wildlife General Obligation Bond Act on the June, 1994 ballot; and, WHEREAS, passage of the CALPAW '94 Bond Act by.the voters will allocate funding to provide needed facilities throughout the greater western Riverside County region for the enhancement of our communities and residents, including local park and recreation facilities, historic preservation projects, hiking/jogging/equestrian trails, museums, senior day care and recreational centers, and a wide variety of other open space and wildlife programs; and, WIIERIAS, CALPAW '94 also includes funding for at-risk youth facilities in order to reduce crime, drug activity, and gang violence in our communities; and, W~, the westm'n Riverside County region will receive an estimate $84 million for development of park and recreation facilities, wildlife habitat acquisition, and other purposes if CALPAW '94 is approved by the voters; and, thousands of jobs will be created with passage of this initiate; NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMIN'~ AND ORDER' AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the City Council hereby endorses the CALPAW '94 initiative and the specific proposition that contains the measure as it will appear on the June, 1994 ballot, and supports its passage by the voters of the Cities and County, and the State of California. Section 2. That the City Council of the City of Temecula will join with elected and appointed officials throughout the western Riverside County region in an ongoing effort to educate the residents of our communities about the benefits of the CALPAW '94 initiative when voters consider the proposition as it appears on the June 1994 election ballot. ._=- R:~soo~15 Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. APPROVEB AND ADOPTi~, this 26th day of April, 1994. ATTEST: Ron Roberts, Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF C.ALIFO~) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CiTY OF TEMBCULA) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 94-__ was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 26th day of April, 1994 by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCH,MEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: June S. Greek, City Clerk R:Xte. so,\lS ~--~ .ITEM NO. 12 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Harwood T. Edvalson, City Manager April 26, 1994 Sister City Trip- Nakayama Town, Japan APPROVAL RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the out-of-state travel of Council Member J. Sal Mur~oz to Japan for City business-related purposes in conjunction with the formal signing of a Sister Cities agreement with Nakayama Town, Japan. BACKGROUND: The City of Temecula is a member of the Temecula Sister City Corporation program, and currently has one official sister city, Voorburg, Netherlands. A second union with the City of Nakayama has also been proposed. If approved, Council Member Mufioz would join Mayor Roberrs in representing Temecula at the signing ceremony. As is the case for Mayor Roberts, the Temecula Sister City Corporation will pay a majority of the travel costs for Council Member Mur~oz to represent the City in the Sister City signing ceremony. There are some unfunded additional expenses, however, which the City may appropriately consider as an expense of an official representative of the City of Temecula. These additional expenses include two nights lodging/meals and official gifts of friendship representative of the City of Temecula, estimated to be approximately $500. FISCAL ANALYSIS: In a previous meeting, the Council authorized Mayor Roberts to expend up to $'500 for Sister City-related expenses. Council Member Mu~oz request is for a similar amount, $500. Staff would like to indicate to Council that travel expenses in Japan are quite high by our standards and Council representatives could face higher. costs than anticipated. If this turns out to be the case, staff requests Council approval to reimburse any reasonable travel expenses directly related to this trip for both Council representatives. Sufficient funds exist in the Council's travel account for this purpose. ITEM NO. 1'3 APPROV~L CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: . DATE: SUBJECT: City Council/City Manager Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer April 26, 1994 "No Parking" - North Side of Rancho California Road between Lyndie Lane and Moraga Road PREPARED BY: Martin C. Lauber, Traffic Engineer RECOMMENDATION: The Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING A 'NO PARKING' ZONE ON THE NORTH SIDE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD BETWEEN LYNDIE LANE AND MORAGA ROAD BACKGROUND: The Traffic Engineering Division of the Public Works Department received and investigated a request to eliminate parking on the north side of Rancho California Road adjacent to Lyndie Lane. The residents on Lyndie Lane observed that the parked vehicles on the north side of Rancho California Road obstruct visibility when looking east from Lyndie Lane. The Traffic Division Staff determined that by restricting parking on Rancho California Road, potential sight obstructions will be eliminated creating sufficient sight distance at Lyndie Lane. The Public/Traffic Safety Commission concurred with staff and requested staff to include any additional red curb needed to provide appropriate sight distance at the driveway east of Lyndie r:~,agdrpt~.g4~.O426~rmnohoel.prklejp Lane. An inventory of the existing off-street parking determined that it would meet the demand created by any displaced vehicles. FISCAL IMPACT: Funds are available in the Department of Public Works Striping/Stenciling Account Number 100-164-999-5410. Red Curb - 230 L.F. at $0.58 = ~133.40 Attachment: Resolution No. 94- Exhibit "A" Proposed Parking Restriction r:%agdrpt~94%0426%ranchcd.prk/ejp ~'~ RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RF.,~LUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF T~IECULA ESTABLISHING A "NO PAl/KING~ ZONE ON THE NORTH SH)E OF RANCHO C/KLI!?ORNIA ROAD Bp.;fWn4:N LYNDIE LANE AND MORAGA ROAD The City Council of the City of Temecula does resolve, determine and order as follows: Section 1. Pursuant to Seaion 10.16.160 of the Temecula Municipal Code, "No Parking" zone is hereby established in the City of Temecula on the north side of Rancho California Road between Lyndie Lane and Moraga Road as shown on Exhibit "A" . Sealon 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 26th day of April, 1994. Ron Roberts, Mayor ATTEST: June S. Greek City Clerk [SEAL] r:%egdrpt%94%O426%ranohcald~ork/ajp STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSmE ) CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temeeula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 94- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 26th day of April, 1994, by the. following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBEKS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: r:%agdrpt~94~O426~raneheel.prk/ajp Z F1 n," .¢ Z n/ h / O O l Z I 'F X I.I 7 I t.-- ITEM NO. TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEYp~ FINANCE OFFICE CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer April 26, 1994 "No Parking" Zone on Margarita Road from Rancho Vista Road to Pauba Road from 6:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Weekdays PREPARED BY: Martin C. Lauber, Traffic Engineer RECOMMENDATION: The Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING "NO PARKING" ZONE ON MARGARITA ROAD FROM RANCHO VISTA ROAD TO PAUBA ROAD FROM 6:00 A.M. TO 4:00 P.M. WEEKDAYS BACKGROUND: The Traffic Division of the Public Works Department has received a request to reduce the amount of red curb on the west side of Margarita Road between Rancho Vista Road and Pauba Road. The demand for parking exceeding the available parking after 4:00 p.m. due to sports activities. Currently there is approximately 615 feet of red curb from Rancho Vista Road southerly to a point 200 feet past the Sports Park driveway. Most of the existing parking restriction was placed to deter school traffic from I~arking on the west side of Margarita Road and jaywalking to and from school. By restricting parking from 6:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., school traffic will be forced to use the east side of Margarita Road. This would alleviate the need for approximately 300 feet of red curb. The remaining red curb is needed adjacent to the Sports Park driveway for sight distance. There is also red curb still required near Rancho Vista Road to make room for the existing northbound left turn lane. The Public/Traffic Safety Commission supported staffs recommendation to create a limited time parking restriction from 6:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. weekdays to avoid student jaywalkers and to provide additional sporting event parking. r:~agdrpt~g4~O426~margarita.prk/ejp FISCAL IMPACT: Funds are available in the Department of Public Works Signs - Account No. 100-164-999- 5244. No Parking Signs - 6 at $125.00 = $750.00 Attachments: Resolution No. 94- Exhibit "A" Proposed Parking Restriction r:%agdrpt%94%O426~nargarfta.prklajp RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMF_.CULA ESTABLIRt!ING "NO PARKING" ZONE MARGARITA ROAD FROM RANCHO VISTA ROAD TO PAUBA ROAD FROM 6:00 A.M. TO 4:00 P.M. WEEKDAYS The City Counc~ of the City of Temecula does resolve, determine and order as follows: Section 1. Pursuant to Section 10.16.160, of the Temecula Municipal Code, "No Parking" zone is hereby established in the City of Temecula on Margaxita Road from Rancho Vista Road to Pauba Road from 6:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. as shown on Exhibit "A" . Section 2. The City Clerkshall cefdfy to the passage and adoption of this Resolution. PASSE!}, APPROVED AND ADOFrED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 26th day of April, 1994. Ron Roberts, Mayor ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] r:~agdrpt~94~,O426~margarite.prk/ejp STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) CITY OF TEMECULA ) SS I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 94- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 26th day of April, 1994 by the foilowing roll call vote: AYES: 0 NOES: 0 ABSTAIN: 0 ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: CO.UNCK,MEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: June S. Greek, City Clerk r:%egdrpt%94%O426~nergeHte.prldejp LO Z [] 09 [] I Q) Z ql p, D >- o w W ~ p- > Z LJ 1.1 _J I z -n L~_ Z --J r-y' ITEM NO. 15 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA .REPORT City Council/City Manager Tim D. Serlst, Director of Public Works/City Engineer April 26, 1994 Professional Services with Robert Bein William Frost and Associates for the Design of Walcott Corridor PREPARED BY: v~ Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve and authorize the Mayor to sign the Professional Services Agreement between the City of Temacula and Robert Bein William Frost and Associates (RBF) to provide Engineering Services for the design of Walcott Corridor, which will include Nicolas Road, Calle Girasol, Calla Chapos and Walcott Lane for an amount not to exceed $118,800 which will be funded through Measure A. BACKGROUND: A request for proposal (RFP) for Professional Engineering Services was developed for the preparation of plans, specifications and estimates for the interim road improvements on Walcott Corridor which will include Nicolas Road, Calls Girasol, Calla Chapos and Walcott Lane. RBF was the higest ranking firm, among those submitted, to provide these professional services. The proposed Walcott Corridor Street Improvements will be designed to provide for two (2) travel lanes (total '32' of pavement) within a 66' wide dedicated right-of-way. The total length of the project is approximately 8,500 feet. The consultant will perform utility research for the project and will provide topographic base maps; street improvement, storm drain, signing and striping plans; hydrology, hydraulic and soil reports; pot holing and utility coordination; project specifications, cost estimates, and obtain all necessary outside agency permits. The consultant's proposal also provides for preparation of legal descriptions and plats that will be required for the necessary drainage easements for the storm drain improvements and slope easements. The proposed schedule is for RBF to start the preliminary design work in May and have the final plans and specifications ready by September. r:~egdrpt%94~0426~wal~4t/ejp The total design cost of $118,800 includes the subconsultants for the aerial photography and geotechnical investigations. FISCAL IMPACT: The total design cost for Walcott Corridor is; 118,800 which will be funded through Measure A. r:~egdrpt%94~O426%wal~ott/aJp AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR ~ CORR.~!~R THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 8th day of April, 1994, between the City · of Temecula, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as 'City" and Robert Bein, William Frost & Associates, a California corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Consultant". The parties hereto mutually agree as follows: SERVICES. Consultant shall perform the tasks set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Consultant shall complete the tasks according to the schedule set forth in Exhibit "A". PERFORMANCE. Consultant shall at all times, faithfully, industrially and to the best of his ability, experience and talent, perform all tasks described herein. PAYMENT. The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, at the hourly rates set forth in Exhibit 'B' attached hereto, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. This amount will not exceed $118,800.00 for the total term of the Agreement unless additional payment is approved by the City Council; provided that the City Manager may- approve additional payment not to exceed ten percent (10%) of the Agreement; but in no event more than $10,000.00. Consultant will submit invoices monthly for ac. tual services performed. Invoices shall be submitted on or about the fh'st business day of each month, for services provided in the previous month. Payment shaU be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice. , SUSPENSION. TERMINATION OR ABANDONMENT OF AGREEMRNT. The City may, at any time, suspend, terminate or abandon this Agreement, or any portion hereof~ by serving upon the Consultant at least ten (10)-days prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Consultant shall immediately cease. all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. Within thirty-five (35) days after receiving an invoice from the Consultant, the City shall pay Consultant for work done through the date that work is to be ceased pursuant to this section. If the City suspends, terminates or abandons a portion of this Agreement such suspension, termination or abandonment shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement. BRE~CH OF CONTRAC'r. In the event that Consultant is in default for Cause under the terms of this Agreement, the City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work performed after the date of default. Default shall include not performing the tasks descn'bed herein to the reasonable satisfaction of the City Manager of the City. Failure by the Consultant to make progress in the performance of work hereunder, if such failure arises out of causes beyond his control and without fault or negligence of the Consultant, shall not be considered a default. 2/tonm/ARG-0~ Ray. 1/22/92 1 psOl/almm/mmtms/O~ 01229~ If the City Manager or his delegate determined that the Consultant defaults in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shah serve the Consultant with written notice of the default. The Consultant shah have ten (10) days after service upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the Consultant falls to cure its default within such period of time, the City shah have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement. TERM. This Agreement shah commence on April 26 ,199/~ and shah remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, bu~'m no event later than April 26 , 19 95. Any disputes regarding performance, default or other matters in dispute between the City and the Consultant arising out of this Agreement or breech thereof, shah be resolved by arbitration. The arbitrator's decision shah be final Consultant shah select an arbitrator from a list provided by the City of three retired judges of the Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services, Inc. The arbitration hearing shall be conducted according to California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1280, et seq. City and Consultant shah share the cost of the arbitration equally. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS. Upon satisfactory completion of, or in the event of termination, suspension or abandonment of this Agreement, aH original documents, designs, drawings and notes prepared in the course of providing the services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shah become the sole property of the City and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission of the ConsultanL INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. The Consultant is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent .contractor. Neither the City nor any of its officers, employees or agents shall have control over the conduct of the Consultant or any of the Consultant's officers, employees or agents, except as herein set forth. The Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for performing services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder. L!~.GAI. R!:.SPONSrRrt .1TIF-~. The Consultant shall keep itseft informed of State and Federal laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Conm,b,mt shall at. all times observe and comply with nil such laws and regulations. The City, and its ot~ficers and employees, shah not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the COn~-d~nnt to comply with this section. 2/fonns/ARG-4~ Rev. 1/22192 2 p~ox/ama/mmm/o~ ou29i 10. NOTICE. Whenever it shall be necessary for either party to serve notice on the other respecting this Agreement, such notice shall be served by certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the City Manager of the City of Temecula, located at 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California 92590, and the Consultant at 28765 Single Oak Drive, Suite 250, Temecula California 92590 unless and until different addresses may be furnished in writing by either party to the other. Notice shall be deemed to have been served seventy-two (72) hours after the same has been deposited in the United States Postal Services. This shall be valid and sufficient service of notice for all purposes. 11. ASSIGNMENT. The Consultant shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without the prior written consent of the City. Upon termination of this Agreement, Consultant's sole compensation shall be the value to the City of the services rendered. 12. LIABII .ITY INSURANCE. The Consultant shall maintain insurance acceptable to the City in full force an effect throughout the term of this contract, against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, his agents, representatives, employees.or subcontractors. Insurance is to be placed with insurer with a Best's rating of no less than A:VII. The costs of such insurance shall be 'included in the Contractor's bid. The Consultant shall provide the following scope and limits of insurance: A. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as: Insurance Services Office form no. GL-0002 (Ed. 1/73) covering Comprehensive General Liability and Insurance Services Office form number GL-0404 covering Broad Form Comprehensive General Liability; or Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage ('occurrence' form CG-0001). u Insurance Services Office form no. CA-0001 (Ed. 1/78) covering Automobile Liability, code 1 'any auto' and endorsement CA-0025. 0 Workers' Compensation insurance as required by Labor Code of the State of California an Employers' Liability insurance. 4. Errors and Omissions insurance. Minimum Iimits of Insurance. Contractor shall maintain limits of insurance no than: General Liability $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage. Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 combined single limit per accident 'for bodily injury and property damage. 2/fonns/ARCa~ ik.v. 1/22/92 3 ~Ol/,Smn/mmm/04 0U2~ Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability: .Workers' compensation as required by the Labor Coda of the State of California and Employers Liability limits of $1,000,000 per accident. 4. Errors and Omissions Insurance: $1,000,000 per occurrence. Cs Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductible in excess of $1,000 must be declared to and approved by the City. .. Other Insurance Provisions. Insurance policies required by this contract shall contain or be endorsed to contain the following provisions: as All Policies. Each insurance polity required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days' prior written notice to the City via United States First Class Mail. General Liability and Automobile LiabilRy Coverages. The City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Consultant; p.roducts and completed operations of the Consultant; premises owned, oCcupied or used by the Consultant, or automol6lles owned, lease, hired or borrowed by the Consultant. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers. With regard to claims arising from the Consultant's performance of the work described in this contract, the Consultant's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees' and volunteers. Any insurance or serf-insurance maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall apply in excess of, and not contribute with, the Consultant's insurance. Any failure to comply with the reporting provisions of the policies shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers. The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suite is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. Cs Worker's Compensation and t:-mployers I-iabilily Coverage. RBF's liability coverage complies with the laws of the State of California as written. do Verification of Coverage. Contractor shall furnish the City with certificates of insurance effecting coverage required by this clause. The certificates for each insurance policy are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The certificates are to be on forms approved 2/ton~/ARO~ a~,. 1/221sr2 4 by the City and are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. The City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of aH required insurance policies, at any time. All subconsultants shah furnish separate certificates. All coverages for subcontractors shah be subject to aH of the requirements stated herein. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City. At the option of the City, either: the insurer shah reduce or eliminate such deductibles or serf insured retentions as respects the City, its officers, officials and employees; or the Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense expenses. 13. 1' .ICF. NSES. The Consultant and subconsultant shah obtain aH necessary licenses, including but not limited to City Business License. 14. INDEMNIHCATION. The Consultant agrees to indemnify and save harmless the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and aH claims, demands, losses, defense cost, or liability of any kind or nature which the City, its officers, agents and employees may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, 'or damage to property arising out of Consultant's negligent performance under the terms of this Agreement, excepting only liability arising out of the sole negligence of the City. 15. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement and any documents or instrument attached hereto or referred to herein integrate aH terms and conditions mentioned herein or incidental hereto supersede aH negotiations and prior writing in respect to the subject matter hereof. In the event of conflict between the terms, conditions, or provisions of this Agreement and any such document or instrument, the terms and conditions of this Agreement shall prevail EFFF-CFIVE DAT!:- AND F. XF. CUTION: This Agreement shah be effective from and after the date it is signed by the representatives of the City. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts. 2/fom/ARCI-0a~ Rc~. 1F~2/92 5 !m01/a~mn/masl~n/0~ ~i IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CONS,,U~/~ 2 By: ~ ~. ~ By Ronald H. Roberts, Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Scott F. Field, City Attorney June S. Greek, City Clerk 2/formqARG-04 Rev. 1122192 6 pO~/gma/maam/04 0X2292 ~ EXHIBIT 'A* SCOPE OF ENOINEERINO SERVICF~ J.N. 400617, Revision No. 1 WALCOTY CORRIDOR Consultant agrees to perform the following Scope of Services: In performing its services hereunder, RBF has or will receive information prepared or compiled by others, the accuracy and completeness of which RBF is entitled to rely upon without independent evaluation or verification. TASK DESCRIItrlONS Task 1.1 Ac~i~ra: A. R~ch, Investigation and Review Consultant shah 'conduct field walk-over of project area and photograph key project features. Consultant shall provide engineering services related to the research and investigation of existing Utilities; i.e., street improvement "as- built" drawings, and utility improvement plans. Collect and revi~, existing MWD and RCWD utility plans, street improvement plans, previous hydrology studies, and other reports to aid in the final engineering design. Consultant shah research available records and maps for existing street right-of-way and properly ownership. From the information obtained; 1) review and compile information, and 2) identify locations of potential conflicts or constraints which may govern the overall design of the project. - Task 1.2 Aa/~ae.t- Consultant shall prepare topographic base maps for the project area. New topographic base mapping will be prepared at a scale of 1" = 40' with one foot contour intervals based upon the limits of the Walcott .Corridor improvements that are identified in the Request for Proposal For purposes of this proposal, the limits of the new topographic mapping are assumed to be 8,500 feet long and 300 feet wide. Information will include scale, contour interval, name of firm, date of survey, method of contour determinations, coordinate control and referenced benchmarks. The work shah include field survey services to set ground control, aerial photogrammetric services, compilation of digital data from the stereo pair photographs, archiving of the digital data, plotting of the final topographic maps screened 60% on City of Temecula mylar base sheets at 1" = 40' horizontal scale, and completion of field survey check profiles. Aerial topographic base sheets at 1" = 40' scale with compilation of AUTOCAD digital data (Version 12). Task Cross-Sections/Utility Locations Consultant shah prepare a field topographic survey of the project site to determine location and elevation of above ground utilities and cross-sections of existing pavement within the project limits. Field notes indicating the location' of possible interfering surface improvements and utilities. Task 1.4 Aa/v///e$.- Gi.,otechnical Investigation (Subconsultant - Leighton & Associates) 1. Background review of pertinent maps and reports. 2. Coordination with Markout Services to locate any known underground utilities. 3. Geologic reconnaissance and mapping of surficial exposures along the alignment. 4. Subsurface investigation consisting of the excavation, logging and sampling of thirteen (13) borings to a maximum depth of 30 feet. within the proposed area of road improvement. 5. Laboratory testing to include 6 R-value tests, 5 consolidation tests, and 35 moisture density tests. 6. Analysis of the data with respect to the proposed development including determination of pavement sections. 7. Preparation of a final report presenting our fmdinga, conclusions and recommendations for development. Boring logs will be included in the final report. Geotechnical report with recommendations for development. 2/forms/ARG-04 Ra. 1/22/92 8 pwOl/al~u/ma~/O~ 0122~ task 13 Task L6 Aai~t~es: Utility Coordination (Subconsultant - Utility Specialist Support) Research and identify existing utility records within the project limits from available information. From the information obtained, 1) identify locations of potential potholing of potential conflicts between existing utilities and proposed repairs, and 2) coordinate the potholing of existing facilities between the City and affected utilities. Notify affected utility companies (via certified mail) of the subject project and request identification and location of facilities within the project limits. Submit street improvement plans to affected utility companies for their possible redesign and relocation. RBF will request potholing of affected utilities by the respective owners for inclusion on the plans. Costs to provide actual potholing consist of a budget of 16 hours of a backhoe to complete anticipated potholing. Additional potholing, if necessary, will be pedormed for an additional fee at the then current hourly rate schedule. Identj~ Relocation Notice Locations - In the event relocation of utilities is indicated; identify utilities to be relocated, notify, in writing, the affected agency, and provide information to the City for their processing of relocate notices. Notice to Relocate - Prior to project bidding assist City in the preparation of notices to relocate for transmittal to affected utility agencies as previously identified, requesting immediate relocation in accordance with the previously determined agreed upon schedule. Prepare a log of all utility related correspondence, including follow-up telephone calls. This log will be transmitted to the City regularly. Environmental Analysis Investigate environmental constraints and concerns of other agencies and identify the need for permits from such jurisdictions as the U.S. Corps of Engineers, California Department of Fish and Game and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board. Consultant shall prepare the "Notice of Intent" application for submittal to the appropriate agency. Consultant shall prepare a S.W.P.P.P. phn for the project for submittal to the appropriate agency. If additional detailed environmental studies are required, they will be provided for an additional fee. /torms/AaO~ R~v. l1221Se2 9 F,,Olla~atslmamm/04 ~ Obtain the necessary permits from said agencies. Task 1.7 Act/~/~e.t' Horizontal Control ConsUltant shah prepare a horizontal control map for 8,500 lineal feet of the Walcott Corridor. Task 1.8 A~: Street Improvement Plans Consultant shah prepare one mylar set of street improvement plans for the proposed Walcott Corridor at a scale of 1": 40' in accordance with the standard requirements of the appropriate governmental jurisdictional agency. The alignment of the corridor shah follow the existing right-of-way and accommodate a 30-35 mph design speed. The street cross-section shah consist of 32' of pavement with an A.C. herre. Design speed may be modified to conform with site constraints identified during development of the project. The street improvement plans shah include the necessary grading required for the proposed improvements. Grading plans shah be in accordance with the soils and grading report provided by Consultant and the City of Temecula Grading Ordinance. 2. 3. 4. 5. Title (1) Typical Section (1) Plan and Prof'de (8) Signing/Striping (3) Intersection Details (2) Task 1.9 L~gal Descriptioms Consultant shall prepare legal descriptions and plats required for acquisition of right-of-way for the Walcott Corridor along with the necessary drainage easements for storm drain improvements and slope easements for permanent and temporary construction, if required. Inasmuch as the scope of work cannot be identified, we anti,~pate upon dose review the need for the preparation of twenty-five (2.5) legal descriptions. If this number is exceeded, additional descriptions shall be prepared for an additional fee in accordance with the compensation described in Exlu'bit B for this task. 2/forms/ARO4)4 lk'v. 1/22/92 10 V-ox/asmm/mm/o~ otazsn Task 1.10 Hydrology/Hydraulic Report Consultant shall review existing. hydrology and hydraulic studies within the Walcott Corridor study area. The proposed drainage subarea boundaries, drainage patterns, concentration points and existing conveyance facilities will be identified during the development of the hydrology. Previous hydrology and master planning studies will be reviewed, updated to include presently planned land uses and incorporated into the overall hydrology analysis. Preliminary design flow rates will be developed for the purpose of locating and sizing the required storm drain facilities. A hydrology map will be developed which summarizes the local drainage, indicating the drainage subareas, storm drain facilities, drainage patterns and design flow rates. Hydrology/Hydraulics Report Task 1.11 Storm Drain Fadities Consultant shall design and prepare storm drain improvement plans at a scale of 1": 40' for the necessary culvert crossing and storm drain improvements for the Walcott Corridor resulting from the design of the street improvement plans and the hydrology/hydraulics report. Improvement plans shall be prepared in accordance with the requirements and criteria of the City of Temecula and incorporated into the street improvement plans. Storm Drain and Culvert Improvement Plans Task 1.12 Acavitia: Specifications and Bid Schedules Consultant shall prepare the special and technical provisions portion of the construction specifications and contract documents suitable for bidding and awarding of the contracts for the improvements to be constructed. These special provisions shall be incorporated into the City's standard construaion document package. The City shall provide the Consultant a standard *boilerplate" document utilizing a typical construction format. This work item specifically excludes development of the *boilerplate* portions of the specifications. Specifications shall include general instructions to the Contractors describing requirements for maintaining access to existing dwelling units for both emergency vehicles and owners during construaion. The fee for this work item is based on the preparation of one (1) master set of special provisions for the proposed improvements and excludes the development of specifications for multiple construction phases or additional specifications for bidding purposes. Specifications d the pwjea will conform with the most recent applicable standards and specifications from the following: 2/form~/AaC_~O4 R~. 1/22/92 11 · · · · · · City of Temecula Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction (Green Book) Applicable APWA State of California Standard Specifications and Standard Plans Riverside County Flood Control District Caltrans Standard Specifications (July 1992) Task 1.13 Aa/v/t/e$.- Final Construction Quantity and Cost Estimate Consultant shah provide engineering services for the preparation of a final quantity and cost estimate for this project. The quantities will be developed from the final construction plans approved by the City of Temecula. Unit costs will be based upon the most current cost information for recent similar projects in the area compiled .by the Consultant and approved by .the City. Quantities will be compiled using scales and planimeter measurements from the improvement plans and design cross-sections. Cross-sections will be prepared at 50' intervals and will be available to provide to Contractors for review. Costs will be presented in tabular form for review by the City. Work under this item specifically excludes preparation of cost estimates during stages prior to f'mal plan preparation or processing other than as provided in other tasks. The quantity and cost estimates will be prepared both at the initial agency plan review and final acceptance. Task 1.14 Projcct Meeting Attendance and. Coordination (RBF/City of Temecula) Consultant shah attend regularly scheduled meetings with the City to review profess of the work included within this contract. A budget for five (:5) project team meetings (32 hours) has been included within this scope of services to accomplish the task. In addition to the project team meetings, it is anticipated that coordination meetings With MWD, RCWD and SCE will be necessary for the successful completion of the project. RBF will schedule these meetings with the respective agencies for City attendance. It is anticipated'that three (3) meetings (40 hours) with each agency will be necessary. Additional meetings and consulting services in excess of this budget will be performed, if required, on an hourly basis for an additional fee after a contract addendure is executed. Additional Services: Services which are not specifically identified herein as .services to be performed by RBF or its consultants are considered "Additional Services" for purposes of this Agreement. Client may request that RBF perform services which are Additional Services. However, RBF is not obligated to perform such Additional Services unless an amendment to this Agreement has been fully executed setting forth the scope, schedule and fee for such Additional Services. In the event RBF performs Additional Services before receipt of such executed amendment, Client acknowledges its obligation to pay for such services at RBF's standard rates, within 30 days of receipt of RBF's invoice. 2/fortns/ARC~04 ik-v. 1/22/92 12 p*Ol/almm/mmm/0~ 0n~ ~ Exclusions Consulting services relating to any of the following tasks may be completed by Consultant if negotiated under a separate contract for an additional fee; but are presently specifically excluded from this Agreement: Geotechnical investigation, except as described herein. Hazardous wastes; Any other services not specifically set forth in the above Scope of Services. Assumptions Consultant's obligations hereunder are based upon the following understanding: 1. The Project services to be provided by Consultant will not require Specific Plan modification or amendment'. Client Responsibilities 1. Client shall provide access to the site. 2. Client is to provide any and all indemnification, abatement, disposal or other actions required by local, state or federal law regarding hazardous materials. 3. Client shall pay all governmental fees and costs. Client Initials Date F. xh~it A 2/torms/^F, O4N g,,,, I/-zz/9'z 13 p,,01/aSmm/mm,-/o4 mzgz EXHIBIT *B* J.N. 400617, Revision No. 1 COMPENSATION WALCOTr CORRIDOR CHent agrees to compensate Consultant for such services as follows: Consultant shall complete the work outlined above on a not to exceed time and materials basis in accordance with the fee schedule identified below and shall invoice Client on a monthly basis based on the percentage of completion. TASK WORK TASK FEE 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 1.10 1.11 1.12 1.13 1.14 Research, Investigation and Review .............................. $4,706 Topographic Base Maps ....................... . ................ 17,240 Cross-Sections/Utility Locations ................................. 4,094 Geotechnical Investigation (Subconsultant - Leighton & Associates) ..... 11,290 Utility Cbordination (Subconsultant - Utility Specialists Support) ........ 9,176 Environmental Analysis ......................................... 9,890 Horizontal Control ............................................ 2,636 Street Improvement Plans ..................................... '22,641 Legal Descriptions ............................................ 7,680 Hydrology/Hydraulic Report .................................... 5,986 Storm Drain Facilities .............................. ........... 6,940 Specifications and Bid Schedules ................................ :. 7,331 Final Construction Quantity and Cost Estimate ...................... 2,680 Project Meeting Attendance and Coordination (RBF/City of Temecula) 6.510 SUB'IXYf~ $118,800 The-budget amount shown for Item 1.14 is for .authorization purposes only. Should the total of the monthly billings reach eighty percent (80%) of the budget amount, Client and Consultant will review the status of the work to determine the need for an increase in the budget amount, and whether additional budget authorization to complete the project is appropriate. RF. IMBURSABT .F. F-X*P~,NSF-q RBF will provide the printing for the tasks included within this Scope of Work at direct cost. No additional costs will be charged for mileage, postage or telephone toil charges. 2/forms/AaG-0~ !l~t. 1/22/92 14 p*oVasma/ms~m/m ouzgz Progress billings will be fonvarded to the Client on a monthly basis. These billings will include the fees earned for the billing period plus aU direct costs advanced by Consultant. The Client shah make every reasonable effort to review invoices within fifteen (15) working days from the date of receipt of the invoices and notify Consultant in writing of any particular item that is alleged to be incorrect. The fees proposed herein shah apply unta August 1, 1994. Due to ever-changing costs, Consultant may increase those portions of the contract fee for which work must still be completed after August 1, 1994 by ten percent (10%). Work shall commence upon receipt of a signed copy of this Contract Agreement. Any work relating to, but not limited to, retaining walls, topographic mapping (except as provided herein), traffic signals, environmental documentation, sound studies or acoustical engineering, underground utility planning design or coordination; design for relocation of all underground facilities; detour plans, property title services, preparation of legal descriptions and exhibits (except as provided herein); staking of joint trench utilities, construction surveying, if required, shall be covered under a separate agreement. · . Fxh~it B Client Initials Date 2/forms/ARG-04 R~v. 1/22/92 15 p.,ox/ssm.-/mmm/o,s on292 II bezT c'Beill , tWilllain cFfost c ssociates PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS, PLANNERS & SURVEYORS HOURLY RATE SCHEDULE Effective August 1, 1993 OFFICE PERSONNEL Principal ..............................................................................................................................................$130.00 Project Director ............................................................................................................... ......................115.00 Structural Engineer ..................................................................................................................................98.00 Project Manager/Project Engineer ...........................................................................................................90.00 Corrosion Engineer ..................................................................................................................................85.00 Senior Engineer .......................................................................................................................................81.00 Senior Designer/Planner ..........................................................................................................................75.00 Design Engineer/Designer (CADD) ........................................................................................................70.(}0 Mapping Calculator .................................................................................................................................67.00 Environmental Mana..ger .......... ......................; .........................................................................................60,00 Senior DrafterFFechnician .......................................................................................................................56,00 Financial Analyst ....................................................................................................................................55.00 Designer/Planner .........................Z ........................................~ ..................................................................55.00 DraftedGraphic Artist .............................................................................................................................48.00 _,.. Environmental Analyst/Staff Planner ......................................................................................................45,0(' Engineerbig/Planning Aide .....................................................................................................................38.(L FIELD PERSONNEL 3-Man Survey Crew ...........................................................................................................................$192.(}0 2-Man Survey Crew ......... : ....................................................................................................................148.(}0 Field Supervisor .......................................................................................................................................88.0(I CONSTRLICTION MANAGEMENT Construction Manager ........................................................................................................................S 110.(}0 Field Superintendent ................................................................................................................................9).(}(} Resident Engineer/Project Manager ........................................................................................................85.(}(I Assistant Field Superintendent ................................................................................................................78.(}0 Senior Construction Inspector .................................................................................................................73.00 Construction Inspector .............................................................................................................................68.00 Field Office Engineer ........................: .....................................................................................................60.(}0 Construction Technicim~ ..........................................................................................................................55.00 COMPUTER & OTHER SERVICE FEES Computer Aided Design and Drafting ................................................................................................$ 35.(}0 P.C. Work Station ....................................................................................................................................15.00 Clerical/Word Processing ........................................................................................................................35.(X~ Consultation Relative to Legal Actions .................................................................................................225.(~ N ore: Blueprinting, reprtxluction. messenger service and other eateel cxpenRs will b~ charged at cost. A Subconsultam Managemcnl Fee of firlee'- percent (15%) will be added to the &reel cost of all subconsultant services to provide for the cost of adnUmslnUo:L subco,k~ultam consultalitnL and insurance. ~ 14725 ALTON PARKWAY · P.O. BOX 57057 ,, IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92619-7057 · (714) 472-3505 · FAX (714) 472-8373 OFFICES LOCATED THROUGHOUT CALIFORNIA ITEM 16 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager APPROV/~T. Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer April 26, 1994 Professional Services with Norris-Repke, Inc. for the Design of Liefer Road PREPARED BY:~' Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve and authorize the Mayor to sign the Professional Services Agreement between the City of Temecula and Norris-Repke, Inc. to provide Engineering Services for the design of Liefer Road, north of Nicolas Road for an amount not to exceed $59,098 pending approval of Service Level R funding source by the adjacent homeowners. BACKGROUND: A request for proposal (RFP) for Professional Engineering Services was developed for the preparation of plans, specifications and estimates for the interim road improvements on Liefer Road, north of Nicolas Road. Norris-Repke, Inc. was the highest ranking firm, among those submitted, to provide these professional services. The proposed Liefer Road improvements will be designed to provide for two (2) travel lanes (total 32' of pavement) within a 66 feet wide graded dedicated right-of-way. The total length of the project is approximately 5,000 feet. The consultant will perform utility research for the project and will provide topographic base maps; street improvement, storm drain, signing and striping plans; hydrology, hydraulic and soil reports; pot holing and utility coordination; project specifications, cost estimates, and obtain all necessary outside agency permits. The consultant's proposal also provides for preparation of legal descriptions and plats that will be required for the necessary drainage easements for the storm drain improvements and slope easements. The proposed schedule is for Norris-Repke, Inc. to start the preliminary design work in mid- June pending approval of Service Level R funding source by the adjacent homeowners. The total design cost of $59,098 includes the subconsultants for the aerial photography and geotechnical investigations. r:~agdela694~O426~eandmgoleJl; FISCAL IMPACT: The total design cost for Liefer Road is $59,098 which will be funded by Service Level R if approved. r:%egdrpt~g4%O42hentlegoleJp AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEERING DESIGN PLANS FOR UEFER ROAD THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 26th day of April, 1994, between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City" and Nords- Reoke, Inc., a California CorPoration, hereinafter referred to as "Consultant". The parties hereto mutually agree as follows: SERVICES. Consultant shall perform the tasks set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Consultant shall complete the tasks according to the schedule set forth in Exhibit "A". PERFORMANCE. Consultant shall at all times, faithfully, industrially and to the best of his ability, experience and talent, perform all tasks described herein. e PAYMENT. The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, at the hourly rates set forth in Exhibit "B" attached hereto, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. This amount will not exceed ~59,098.00for the total term of the Agreement unless additional payment is approved by the City Council; provided that the City Manager may approve additional payments not to exceed ten percent (10%) of the Agreement, but in no event more than ~ 10,000. Consultant will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed. Invoices shall be submitted on or about the first business day of each month, for services provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice. e SUSPENSION, TERMINATION OR ABANDONMENT OF AGREEMENT. The City may, at any time, suspend, terminate or abandon this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the Consultant at least ten (10) days prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Consultant shall immediately cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. Within thirty-five (35) days after receiving an invoice from the Consultant, the City shall pay Consultant for work done through the date that work is to be ceased pursuant to this section. If the City suspends, terminates or abandons a portion of this Agreement such suspension, termination or abandonment shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement. BREACH OF CONTRACT. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under the terms of this Agreement, the City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work performed after the date of default. Default shall include not performing the tasks described herein to the reasonable satisfaction of the City Manager of the City. Failure by the Consultant to make progress in the performance of work hereunder, if such failure arises out of causes beyond his control, and without fault or negligence of the Consultant, shall not .be considered a default. -1 - r:.~beewidcbtoffell.egrll~ e If the City Manager or his delegate determines that the Consultant defaults in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the Consultant with written notice of the default. The Consultant shall have ten (10) days after service upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the Consultant fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement. TERM. This Agreement shall commence on June 1, 1994, and shall remain and continue in effect until tasks described her.in are completed, but in no event later than June 1, 1995. Any disputes regarding performance, default or other matters in dispute between ,the City and the Consultant arising out of this Agreement or breech thereof, shall be resolved by arbitration. The arbitrator's decision shall be final. Consultant shall select an arbitrator from a list provided by the City of three retired judges of the Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services, Inc. The arbitration hearing shall be conducted according to California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1280, etseo. City and Consultant shall share the cost of the arbitration equally. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS. Upon satisfactory completion of, or in the event of termination, suspension or abandonment of this Agreement, all original documents, designs, drawings and notes prepared in the course of providing the services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission of the Consultant. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. The Consultant is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent contractor. Neither the City nor any of its officers, employees or agents shall have control over the conduct of the Consultant or any of the Consultant's officers, employees or agents, except as her.in set forth. The Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for performing services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of performing services her.under. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES. The Consultant shall keep itself informed of State and Federal laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Consultant shall at all times observe and comply with all such laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Consultant to comply with this section. rAbeswick~t~rddl.lsgrlajp 10. 11. 12. NOTICE. Whenever it shell be necessary for either party to serve notice on the other respecting this Agreement, such notice shall be served by certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the City Manager of the City of Temecula, located at 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California 92590, and the Consultant at 33055 Vino Way, Temecula, California 92591 unless and until different addresses may be furnished in writing by either party to the other· _ Notice shall be .deemed to have been sewed seventy-two (72) hours after the same has been deposited in the United States Postal Services. This shall be valid and sufficient service of notice for all purposes.' ASSIGNMENT. The Consultant shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due her·under, without the prior written consent of the City. Upon termination of this Agreement, Cormultant's sole compensation shall be the value to the City of the services rendered· LIABIIITY INSURANCF. The Consultant shall maintain insurance acceptable to the City in full force an effect throughout the term of this contract, against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work her·under by the Consultant, his agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors. Insurance is to be placed with insurer with a Beats' rating of no less than A:VII. The costs of such insurance shall be included in the Contractor's bid. The Consultant shall provide the following 'scope and limits of insurance: A. Minimum Scope of Insurance. ~Coverage shall be at least as broad as: Insurance Services Office Form No. GL-0002 (Ed. 1/73) covering Comprehensive General Liability and Insurance Services Office Form No. GL-0404 covering Broad Form Comprehensive General Liability; or Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage ("occurrence" Form No. CG-0001 ). Insurance Services Office Form No. CA-0001 (Ed. 1/78) covering Automobile Liability, 'Code I "any auto" end Endorsement CA-0025. Workers' Compensation insurance as required by Labor Code of the State of California and Employers' Liability insurance· 4. Errors and Omissions insurance. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Contractor shall maintain limits of insurance no less than: General Liability: $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage. e Automobile Liability: $1,000,000combined single limit per accident for bodily injury and property damage. Workers' Compensation and Employers' Liability: 'Workers' Compensation as required by the Labor Code of the State of California and Employers' Liability limits of $1,000,000 per accident. -3- r:.~beswk~k~tsll. egrlejl~ 4. Errors and Omissions Insurance: e 1,000,000 per occurrence. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductible in excess of ~ 1,000 must be declared to and approved by the City. Other Insurance Provisions. Insurance policies required by this contract shall contain or be endorsed to contain the following provisions: All Policies. Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by either party,-reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days prior written notice to the City via United States First Class Mail. General Liability and Automobile liability Coveraaes. The City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Consultant; products and completed operations of the Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by the Consultant, or automobiles owned, lease, hired or borrowed by the Consultant. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers. With regard to claims arising from the Consultarrt'e performance of the work described in this contract, the Consultant's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall apply in excess of, and not contribute with, the Conaultant'e insurance. Any failure to comply with the reporting provisions of the policies shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its officers officials, employees or volunteers. The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. Worker's Comoensation and Emolovers' Liability Coverage. The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers for losses arising from work performed by the Consultant for the City.. Verification of Coveraoe. Contractor shall furnish the City with certificates of insurance effecting coverage required by this clause. The certificates for each insurance policy are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The certificates are to be on forms provided by the City and are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. The City' reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, at any time. · 4- r:,~emNiek~nodlll.~grlmJl~ Consultant shall include all subconsultants as insureds under its policies or shall furnish separate certificates for each subcontractor. All coverages for subcontractors shall be subject to all of the requirements stated herein. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to end approved by the City. At the option of the City, either: the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects the City, its officers, officials and employees; or the Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense expenses. 13. LICENSES. The Consultant and subconsultant shall obtain all necessary licenses, including but not limited to City Business License. 14. INDEMNIFICATION. The Consultant agrees to indemnify and save harmless the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, losses, defense cost, or liability of any kind or nature which the City, its officers, agents and employees may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of Consultant'a negligent performance. under the terms of this Agreement, excepting only liability arising out of the sole negligence of the City. 15. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement and any documents or instrument attached hereto or referred to herein integrate all terms and conditions mentioned herein or incidental hereto supersede all negotiations and prior writing in respect to the subject matter hereof. In the event of conflict between the terms, conditions, or provisions of this Agreement and any such document or instrument, the terms and conditions of this Agreement shall prev. ail. EFFECTIVE DATE AND EXECUTION: This Agreement shall be effective from and after the date it is signed by the representatives of the City. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts. '5- r:.~beewiek~H~isll.sgrlsJp IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CONSULTANT CITY OF TEMECULA By: By Norris-Repke, Inc. Ron Roberts, Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney, ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk "6- r:.%hoswiok~no,vte~.aOr;aip EXHIBIT "A' TASKS TO BE PERFORMED SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "A' EXHIBIT "A" r.%lNiswick~a~fidLaOrlldp EX~NIBIT "A" j'~L"~~ NORRIS-REPKE, INC. I ' Ci il En ineers and Land Sur've ors January 6, 1994 (714) 676-8488 JackP. Norris, FE Warren W. Repke, PE Flandy G. Ben-/, PE Joseph M. Loyetho, PLS Mr. Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer Public Works Department City of Tcmecula 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 Reference: RFP #22 - Liefer Road NRI P-749c Dear Mr. Spagnolo: We appreciate the oppommity to present this proposal to provide professional engineering services for the street improvements on the subject project. Norris-Repke is well qualified to provide the required services and offers the City the following: 1. A firm 'with extensive experience in providing services to public agencies. 2. We specialize in street improvement projects and have successfully completed a long list of such projects. 3. Our entire projeet team brings a wealth of experience in the design of street improvement projects similar to those in this project. This asset is essential to a successfUl project. Our history of successful projects and clients over the past nine years is additional insurance that the City will be satisfied with our approach, expertise, responsiveness and the final product. Soils investigation and pavement design will be performed by GeoSoils, Inc. ofMurrieta. GcoSoils is a highly qualified gcotcchnical firm, well-respected in Southern California with specific knowledge of this locality. Hank Mohlc & Associates will bc the traffic engineering subconsultant. · Hank has been practicing traffic engineering in Southern California for decades. Hc serves as the City of Mur~cta's contract traffic engineer and is well acquainted with this area. Wc have a professional relationship with both firms dating back many years. Their discussions lump all four projects in RFP #22 together. MAIN OFFICE: 18231 IRVINE BLVD. · SUITE 204 · TUSTIN, CA 92680 · (714) 730-6410 · FAX: (714) 730-6396 Mr. Don Spagno. lo City of Temecula January 6, 1994 NRI P-749c Page 2 We are a highly computerized firm and use modern methods in our approach to survey, design and plan preparation of street improvement projects. We keep well informed on the latest street rehabilitation and improvement methods and the design and construction requirements for those methods. It is our goal to provide the highest quality professional service. We want to be proud of each project. We recently completed the design of two road projects for the City of Murrieta involving new roadways, widenings and rehabilitation, as well as drainage improvements. One project is under construction. The second smaller project under the same'engineering contract is in review. Sruveying was performed by our own crew, and we subcontracted the soils engineering to GeoSoils, Inc. of Murrieta. We want very much to begin working with the City of Temecula and look forward to a successful project should we be selected. Thank you for the opportunity to submit this proposal. It is valid until August 1, 1994· We applaud your QBS approach. Sincerely, · on'is, PE 3PN:mr c:\wp6\pro\749e,.pro NORRIS-REPKE, INC. City of Temecula Engineering Services Proposal for SWeet Improvements on the Liefer Road TABI .E OF CONTENTS PROJECT DISCUSSION .................................... 1 THE FIRM ........ , ............... ". ................... 2 PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND KEY PERSONNEL .................... 2 QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE ........... ........... : .... 4 SCOPE OF SERVICES ...................................... 4 SCHEDULING .................................. , ....... 10 APPENDIX · STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT LIST · RIGHT OF WAY ENGINEEKING & ACQUISITION · STORM DRAIN PROJECTS LIST · RESUMES · FEDERAL FORM 254 · TABLE OF TASKS · HANK MOHLE & ASSOCIATES PROPOSAL · GEOSOILS, INC. PROPOSAL NORRIS-REPKE, INC. City of Temeeula Engineering Services Proposal for Street Improvements on Liefer Road NR.I P-749c January 6, 1994 Page 1 of 10 PROJECT DISCUSSION: Liefer Road is a dirt road approximately 5000' long in a loop alignment. It is within (hopefully) a right of way 66' wide (according to the AP maps) with many driveways. The corridor is to be improved to a Local Mountain Residential Street per City Standard Plan #I 11: 28' of pavement on a 50' right of way; with a 4' shoulder, or an AC dike and 5' parkway. It appears a bridge or culvert is under construction on the west intersection at Nicolas Road. A south-sloping drainage course crosses Liefer near mid-length which will require a culvert or other drainage device (Photo 18). We do not anticipate significant changes to the profile. The design will involve smoothing the profile while matching or sligh~y lowering the grades at the existing driveways. Some angle points in the ali~ment have already been smoothed with curves; others have not, so some additional right of way will be needed at two locations. Also, three comer cut-offs at Nicolas may be required. This is a comparatively simple project but, like all, must be done with care and thoroughness. NORRIS-REDKE. INC. NRI P-749c January 5, 1994 Page 2 of 10 NORRIS-REPKE,'INC., was founded in 1994 to provide professional civil engineering, land surveying and technical services to public agencies and the private sector in the Southern Caiifomia area. We have served 35 cities, counties and districts in that time. Our philosophy is to determine, understand and satisfy the needs of our clients and act as an extension of their staff. Our prime objective is to provide the highest quality of professional and technical services in a cost-effective, timely and personalized manner. Each project is personally managed by a principal oft he firm assuring project continuity from start to f'mish. Due to the background of the principals and key persounel,-we can offer the benefits of a wide range of knowledge and experience that makes us sensifive to the needs of our clients. We understand the complete project process and are able to provide the necessary services to guide projects from the early planning stages through design and completion of construction. We are a growing and progressive firm. We use computer technology extensively for maximum project efficiency and maintain an array of computer hardware and software including CAD and an integrated electronic surveying system. The company is headed by its two principals. Jack Norris and Warren Repke, both registered civil engineers. Other registered civil engineers include Randall Berry' who has been with us 'six years, Scott Jewett and, as of the new year, Noel Torkelson, formerly principal of GPS Consuiting Engineers who closed their business at year end. Professional land surveyor Joseph Loyatho heads our surveying and mapping department. Our twelve personnel include a recent civil engineer graduate, surveyors, drafters, technicians, a civil engineering student intern and administrative people. PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND KEY PERSONNEL: NORRIS-KEPKE, INC. believes that effective organization and management. is vital to the successful completion of the project. Communication between us and the City must be at the highest level throughout all phases of the project. For this reason we propose to assign a Project Manager who will be responsible for execution of the work program and be the principle project contact. Jack Norris would be the principal in charge/project manager and contact person for City staff. He roans the Temecuia branch office where the engineering would be done. Detailed design, drafting, estimating and typin~ would be performed in the Tustin main office. NORRIS-REPKE, INC. NRI P-749c January 5, 1994 Page 3 of 10 Mr. Norris is a registered civil engineer (#C15446) in California and a member of the American Society of Civil Engineers where he is actively involved in eor~mittee and technical group functions. During his public and private engineering career Mr. Norris has been involved with numerous street improvement, grading and drainage projects of all types including those listed on the street improvementproject list included in the Appendix. Additional expertise is available from Warren W. Repke. Mr. Repke has been involved in public works planning, design and construction since 1965. During this time he was employed .by the State Department of Water Resources and the cities of Buena Park, Costa Mesa and Orange as well as a Southem California consulting engineering fn'm prior to the formation of Norris-Repke, Inc. in 1984. Assisting Jack, detailed design would be supervised by Scott Jewitt, P.E. Surveying will be performed by Norris-Repke, Inc., crews under the supervision of Joseph Loyatho, Professional Land Surveyor. The resumes of Jack, Warren, Joseph and Soctt are included in the Appendix. In addition to the above key personnel, appropriate members of the Norris-Repke, Inc., technical, drafting and clerical staff will pwvide assistance where required to insure the project tasks are completed with high quality and on schedule. Our organizational structure for these projects would be as below: IJack P. Norris, P.E. I Principal/Project Engineer Randall G. Berry, P.E. Engineering Manager I l Joseph M. Loyatho, P.L.S. I Survey Manager I I I . Survey Technician Suvey Technician I lScon Jewcn, P.E. Assistant Project Engineer I I I I NORRIS-REPKE, INC. NRI P-749c January 5, 1994 Page 4 of 10 QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERTENCE We believe Norris-Repke, Inc., is well qualified to perform the requested services due to the following. 1. We have extensive experience in providing services to public agencies including many cities. 2. We specialize in street widening, rehabilitation, new construction and drainage projects and have successfully completed a long list of such projects. 3. Our entire project team brings a wealth of experience in the design of street and drainage projects and have successfully completed a long list of such projects. " We understand the project design requirements and issues associated with 'developing a project. of this nature and are aware of the unique areas of design and specifications development that · must be addressed. We have prepared projects under Community Development Block Grant . requirements, redevelopment agency requirements (although not Riverside specifically) and several more. 5. Our history of successful projects and clients over the past nine years is additional insurance that the City will be satisfied with our approach, expertise, responsiveness and the final product. SCOPE OF SERVICES Based on the City request for proposal, our field investigation of the site, discussion with City staff and our prior experience, we have proposed a four phase work program that considers the project concerns and develops the appropriate designs and construction documents. The initial phases are concerned with data collection and developing the project concepts and elements and elements followed by a construction documents preparation and construction phase. These are further described below. PHASE I: ORIENTATION/DATA COLLECTION Orientation 1. Hold "kickoff' meeting with City staff. Our approach would be discussed and necessary criteria established. Information required from the City would be requested. 2. Obtain AP maps for (right of way) determination. 3. Revisit the site to refresh our memory of its features and to visualize the design. NORRIS-REPKE, INC. NRI P-749c January 5, 1994 Page 5 of I 0 B. Soils investigation/Pavement design Conduct soils investigation. Prepare report with recommendations on grading, subgrade preparation and preliminary pavement design. This would be performed by GeoSoils, Inc. Please refer to their detailed scope of services in the Appendix. Final pavement design on Walcott fills may not be possible until near completion of rough grading. C. Topographic Survey 1. Establish cente~ine control and stationing based on control data provided by the City in the immediate area of the projects. Set and document horizontal control markers. 2. Establish vertical control and temporary project bench marks from local benchmarks. Locate all pertinent topographic features within the right of way. Locate additional topography beyond fight of way where slope grading will be required, and existing dirt and paved driveways may need to be regraded or reconstructed .to meet future right of way grade. __, Plot cross-sections of existing pavement on Nicolas. Obtain complete topography at locations of proposed drainage improvements necessary for proper design. Return if necessary during the design phase to obtain additional information required by the project engineer. D. Utility Research and Initial Notification By letter, notify the utility companies of the upcoming project to aid their planning, and request utility locations. (Potholing may be requested later -- see "Project Analysis and Design".) E. Right of Way Research Obtain assessors parcel maps and any other documents in City files to determine existing fights of way. ' F. Drainage Research Obtain available design peak Q's of erossing watercourses from the City or RCFCWCD. Where Q's are not available, obtain topographic maps CtJSGS minimum) to enable our own calculations. NORRIS-REPKE, INC. NR/P-749c January 5, 1994 Page 6 of 10 PHASE II: BASE SHEETS AND CONCEPT PLANS A. Topographic Base Sheets Plan and profile base sheets would be prepared on mylar sheets at a scale of 1 "--40'. These base sheets would be prepared using AutoCAD 12 and include the following: 1. Street right of way. Property lines from Assessor's Maps. 2. Centerline control and stationing. 3. Location of existing street improvements and topographic features obtained from field survey, including trees, shrubs, irrigation lines and fences. 4. Utility locations. 5. Profiles of centerline and existing curb, berm or right of way. 6. Contours with appropriate contour intervals. 7. The topography would be backgrounded or "screened." B. Field Review Perform comprehensive field review of all street areas to determine the following: 1. Existing conditions that may affect design. 2. Drainage requirements. 3. Private property alteration (grade transition new right of way line). C. Develop Project Analysis and Design We would prepare conceptual plans and complete hydrology studies at this stage, with altematives as appropriate. Included would be rough grading extents, preliminary earthwork quantities, and preliminary design of drainage facilities. NORRIS-REPKE, INC. NRI P-749e January 5, 1994 Page 7 of 10 At critical locations additional underground utility information may be required. We realize the utility companies' record plans are sometimes deficient. In such instances .we will arrange for potholing and will accurately survey the actual utility locations. We will meet with City staff to discuss our recommendations and reach concurrence on the f'mal project design. PHASE III: CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS Based on the results of Phase II, the final construction documents would be prepared. The following is an outline of the scope of services for preparation and processing of the construction documents for the project. A. Construction Docment Preparation 1. Complete project title sheet using AutoCAD 12. Prepare plan and profile sheets at a scale of 1 "--40' showing construction to conform to the approved concept. plan.. Construction elements would be clearly defined. New centerline profiles would be shown. Erosion control measures would be shown on these plans. 3. Prepare plans, profiles and details of drainage improvements, with all pertinent hydraulic information including HGL in profile, design frequency, Q, V, D, and De- 4. Prepare detail sheet for typical sections and details. 5. Prepare signing and striping plans. Prepare complete project specifications using City Special Provisions and "boiler plate", and the Green Book as the Standard Specifications, using WordPerfect 6. City to provide basic boiler plate on disk for our editing. Prepare itemized construction quantities and cost estimate for the present phase using Lotus 123. The underlying cales would be keyed to color-coded plans. Earthwork quantities would include subsidence and shrinkage (or swell). We would specify requirements for traffic control and for the preparation of a detour, phasing and traffic control plan. NORRIS-REPKE. INC. NRI P-749c January 5, 1994 Page 8 of 10 Right of Way Document Preparation 1. Prepare maps and legal descriptions of right of way and slope easements to be obtained. 2. Prepare letters of permission to grade on private property. 3. Provide miscellaneous services to assist the City in the process of right of way acquisition. Construction Document Processing 1. Upon completion of the preliminary plans, specifications and cost estimate, submit two sets of each to the City for initial review and comment. 2.. Submit all documentation (plans, specs, estimate, drainage reports, applications, letters of interest, etc.) necessary to obtain all required permits from the agencies and districts including federal (NPDES compliance, COE), state (Fish and Game) and water districts (MWD, EMWD, RCWD). Maintain communication with those entities to facilitate approval. 3. Meet with City staff to discuss results of City staff review. 4. Make agreed revisions and corrections to the plans, specifications and cost estimate and submit the original plans, specifications, survey data, and itemized cost estimate to City for bidding. Utility Coordination 1. Prepare preliminary utility notices and send preliminary plans to utilities at the same time we submit plans to the City for initial review. 2. We will monitor responses from utility companies and coordinate with utility companies regarding relocation of facilities. This does not include the design of any utility relocations for the utility companies. 3. Send final utility notice to each utility company. NORRIB-REPKE, INC. NRI P-749c January 5, 1994 Page 9 of 10 PHASE IV: BIDDING AND CONSTRUCTION Prepare bid specification package including: bidders' instructions, bid sheets, general specifications, special provisions and technical specifications using the City's boiler plate contract docments. Draft the report to the City Council for authorization to advertise for bids. Reproduce a rimbet of bid documents for Contractors' pickup. B. Answer questions during bidding and issue addenda if necessary. Attend bid opening. Review and analyze bids for correct arithmetic, balance and completeness. Check low bidder's references. Prepare bid summary. Prepare report to council for contract award. D. Attend pre-constmction meeting. E. View the progress of the work daily. Clarify plans and answer questions regarding the prepared designs and specifications during construction if necessary. City Responsibilities The City would assume the following responsibilities: 1. Make available and provide all existing data and information relevant to the proposed project. 2. Provide copy of existing street construction plans. 3. Plan checking. 4. Construction management and inspection. 5. Right of way acquisition. NORRIS-REPKE. INC. NRI P-749c January 5, 1994 Page 10 of 10 SCHEDULING NORRIS-REPKE, INC. proposes to provide the services outlined in accordance 'with the following project schedule. The schedule is based on past experience in providing the services as outlined in this proposal. Our present work load would allow this. We have ongoing field and office work but desire a continual influx to sustain operations. Calendar Weeks End of Week #: Orientation/Data Collection Soils Investigation Base Sheets and Concept Plans Meet with City (Concept Plans) Prepare PS&E Submit City Review Finalize PS&E 0 4 8 12 16 20 22 NORRIS-REPKE, INC. EXHIBIT "B" PAYMENT SCHEDULE SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "B' EXHIBIT "B" R'X~T. BIT NORRIS-REPKE. INC. 676-581B . FAX: (3-q~J 675-8488 Jack P. Nor,r~,l~ Wen W. Rspke. J=ephM. LW.~.Pt.S NORRIS-RF, PKB, INC. SCHEDULE OF STANDARD HOURLY RATES Pdndpal Engineer ............................. $ ! 10.oo Englneetlnlg Mam~e,e ............................. 83.00 .......................... Des~ner/Senlo~ .......................... Junior Engineer ............................... Dmfter/Technldan ................. Technical Aidc/~r. Draficr ............. ' Clerical ...................... FIeld inspector .............................. Ucensed Land Surveyor ........................... Survey Crew 150.00 (3-man) ................................ 1 ;35. O0 (a -man) ................................. Survey Travel Time I st one-half hour each way ................... 1/1 crew rate · N/C Mtet I st one-hatf hour each way ............ .......... z60.Oo Expert Testimony (:a hour minimum) ......... 6S,OO 58.00 48.00 .......... 42,00 ........... 31.00 ............. 37.00 47°00 The above fees will be escidaled 5% on each Augurn I bcginrdna AuguSt 1, 1994, for any work uncompleted st titat time for reasons beyond E~gineer'S conttoL OutsMe agency fees and rcproduc~ons arc nol tnduded in above fecs and wUI be bUIcd at cost plus C:wpe~lnk~t'%r~ese3-94, MAIN OFFICE: 18231 BqVINE BLVD, · SUffE ~D4 · TUSTIN, CA 9~68Q · [7141730-6410 · FAX: [714) 730-6396 ITEM 17 APPROVAl TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer April 26, 1994 Temecula Senior Center PW92-07 Acceptance of a Grant of Easement - Sixth Street PREPARED BY: ~ Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer Dennis Armstrong, Assistant Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council; 1. Authorize the Mayor to execute the Agreement and Grant of Easement with the State of California, Department of Forestry and Fire Protection accepting an easement for public roadway purposes. 2. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94-_ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE GRANT OF EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC ROADWAY PURPOSES AND ACCEPTING INTO THE CITY-MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM, A PORTION OF THE CUL-DE-SAC AT THE NORTHEASTERLY END OF SIXTH STREET. BACKGROUND: During a review of the Temecula Senior Center improvement plans, the California Department of Forestry (CDF) discovered that a portion of the existing cul-de-sac improvements at the northeasterly end of Sixth Street had been constructed upon CDF's property. The Department of Forestry would like to grant an easement over that portion of its property to the City for public roadway purposes. The parcel .has been improved to City standards and lies adjacent to the parcel being leased .from CDF for parking at the Temecula Senior Center. pw 13~gdrpt%94't0426'tsixthst.acc Acceptance of the easement gives the City the legal right to use the parcel for roadway purposes and enables the City to accept the remainder of the cul-de-sac improvements into the City-Maintained Street System. Other portions of Sixth Street have been accepted into the City-Maintained Street System, including portions extending from Mercedes Street to the northeasterly terminus. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact has been identified in accepting the grant of easement for this road segment. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution No. 94- with Exhibits "A-B", inclusive. pwl 3~agdrpt~94%O426~ixthet.a;o I~g~OLUTION NO. 94.- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TI~fECULA, C~,LWORNIA, ACCEPTING A GRANT OF EAS~ FOR PUBLIC ROADWAY PURPOSES AND INTO THE CITY- MAINTAINED STI~RRT SYSTEM, A PORTION OF THF~ CUL-DE-SAC AT THE NORTHEASTERLY END OF SIXTH STl~ET. The City Council of the City of Temecula does resolve, determine and order as follows: WHEREAS, the State of California, Department of Forestry and Fire Protection has granted an easement to the City of Temecula for public roadway purposes, a portion of Sixth Street; WIIEREAS, the acceptance of.the casement for this portion of Sixth Street subjects the City of Temecula to the standard provisions set forth in Exhibit *A *, attached hereto;' WIIEREAS, the legal description for this portion of Sixth Street is set forth in Exhibit "A" and depicted in Exhibit *B", attached hereto; WHEREAS, this portion of Sixth Street has been improved to City of Temecula standards; WHEREAS, the .City desires to accept the grant of easement for public roadway purposes, this portion of Sixth Street; WHEREAS, the City desires to accept this portion of Sixth SWeet into the City-Maintained Street System; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Temecula as follows: Section 1. That the City of Temecula accept~ the grant of easement for public roadway purposes, that portion of Sixth Street as described in Exhibit *A* and depicted in Exhibit 'B* attached hereto. Section 2. That the City of Temecula accepts this portion of Sixth Street into the City- maintained street system at this time. Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution' PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 26th day of April, 1994. Ron Roberts, Mayor pw 13%egdrpt%94%O426%sixthst.ecc ATTEST: June S; Greek City Clerk [SF_ L] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, June S. ~k, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby ceffify that Resolution No. 94- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 26th day of April, 1994, by the following vote: CO~CII~~ERS: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: COUNCILlVlEMBERS: COUNC~ERS: COUNCILlVlElVIBERS: pwl 3~,agdrpt~S4t, O426%sixthst.acc EXHIBIT "A" TO RESOLUTION NO. 94- SUBJECT DEDICATION - PORTION OF SIXTH STREET ( Legal Description Attached) pwl 3%egdrpt%94~)426~eixthet,4mo WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO L_ AGREEMENT AND GRANT OF PUBLIC ROADWAY SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE Ag. ncy: Dept. of Forestry and Fire Protection EASEMENT project: Temecula Forest Fire Stalion FIle: '. TR93 133-E THIS AGREEMENT AND GRANT OF EASEMENT is made and entered into by and between the STATE OF CALIFORNIA, acting by and through its DIRECTOR OF GENERAL SERVICES, hereinafter called State, and CITY OF TEMECULA, hereina~er called Grantee. State, pursuant to the provisions of Section 14666 of the Government Code of the State of California, hereby grants unto Grantee, its successors and assigns forever, an easement to locate, relocate, construct, reconstruct, alter, use, maintain, inspect, repair, replace and remove a public roadway and appurtenances deemed necessary therefor by Grantee, over, on, under and across that certain real property situated in the City of Temecula, COunty of Riverside, State of California, being those portions of Lots 10 through 14, Block 1 of the Town of Temecula as shown on a map thereof filed in Book 15, Page 726 of Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, California, described as follows: Commencing at a point being the intersection of the southwesterly line and the southeasterly line of said Block 1; said point also being the most southerly comer of Lot 1 of said Block 1; and said southeasterly line of Block I being, for its entire length, identical to the northwesterly right of way line of Sixth Street; thence, from said point of commencement, North 44'21'15" East 237.5 feet along said southeasterly line of Block I to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence leaving said southeasterly line of Block 1, North 29'01'29" East 15.12 feet; thence North 28'05'38" East-50.00 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve, concave southeasterly, having a radius of 50.00 feet; thence northeasterly along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 62'12'03" an arc distance of 54.28 feet to a point o.n the northeasterly line of said Lot 14; thence South 45'31'15" East 4.77 feet along said northeasterly line of Lot 14 to its point of intersection with said southeasterly line of Block 1, said point of intersection being the most easterly corner of said Lot 14; thence South 44'21 '15" West 112.5 feet along said southeasterly line of Block I to said TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Basis of Bearings for foregoing described courses being: North 44'21'15" East for the centerline of Sixth Street; said street having 60.00 feet wide right of way comprising of 30.00 feet on each side of street centedine, measured perpendicular to street centedine. as shown on a Survey Plat based upon a field survey make by '~A/alker" in 1958 for State of California, Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CDF), a copy of which is on file at CDF Headquarters, Sacramento. California. THE PROVISIONS ON THE REVERSE SIDE HEREOF CONSTITUTE A PART OF THIS AGREEMENT Dated STATE OF CALIFORNIA Department of General Services By G1U, NTmS:CITY OF TEMECULA By APPROVED: IkTc. of Forestry ~ Fire Protection By By L RES - 600 (3/e2) PROVIDED, this Grant of Easement is Subject to the following terms and conditions: This Grant is subject to existing contracts, leases, licenses, easements, encumbrances, and claims which may affect said property and the use of the word "Grant" herein shall not be construed as a covenant against the existence of any thereof. 2. Grantee waives all claims against State, its officers, agents, and employees, for loss or damage caused-by, adsing out of, or in any way connected with the exercise of this Easement, and Grantee agrees to save harmless; indemnify, and defend State, its officers, agents, and employees, from any and all loss, damage or liability which may be suffered or incurred by State, its officers, agents, and employees caused by, adsing out of, or in any way connected with exercise by Grantee of the dghts hereby granted, except those arising out of the sole negligence of State. 3. State reserves the dght to use said real property in any manner, provided such use does not unreasonably interfere with Grantee's dghts hereunder. 4. This Easement shall terminate in the event Grantee fails for a continuous pedod of 18 months to use this Easement for the purposes herein granted. Upon such termina- tion, Grantee shall forthwith upon service of written demand, deliver to State a quitclaim deed, to its dght, title and interest hereunder, and shall, on State request, without cost to State, and within 90 days from wdtten demand byState, remove all property placed by or for Grantee upon said property and restore said premises as neady as possible to the same condition they were in pdor to the execution of this Easement. In the event Grantee should fail to restore the premises in accordance with such request, State may do so at the dsk of Grantee, and all costs of such removal and restoration shall be paid by Grantee upon demand. IIES-IOO (3182) -- REVERSE EXHIBIT 'B' TO RESOLUTION NO. 94- SUBJECT DEDICATION - PORTION OF SIXTH STREET {Map Attached) pwl 3%egdq~t%94%O426%ixthet.eoc M~R CEDE5 · SKETCH TO ACCOMPAtlY LEGAL DESCRIPTION 81A'TH ,5'TREE T C UL - DE- S, qC A T SENIOR 'el T/ZEAl CEN rEt~ STREET 4-0' SHEET ITEM NO. 18 APPROVAT. CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA · AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer April26,1994 Contract Amendment No. 7 to Community Facilities District 88-12 Engineering Services Contract with J.F. Davidson Associates, Inc. for the Overland Drive Overcrossing' Improvement Project PREPARED BY:~ Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve Contract Amendment No. 7 to provide additional engineering services for CFD 88-12 by J.F. Davidson Associates, Inc. (JFD) for the Overland Drive Overcrossing Improvement Project in an amount not to exceed el 06,888. BACKGROUND: The additional costs detailed in the following section for the Overland Drive Overcrossing Improvement Project were arrived at during the design review process with Caltrans. The following items of work are being performed as a result of a change in the approach grade to the bridge crossing at Jefferson Avenue, and other items of work. The following are the various items necessary to complete the engineering plans and specification for the Overland Drive Overcrossing. ITEM 1: Jefferson Avenue Improvements Due to the revised grade on Overland Drive at Jefferson Avenue approximately 1,000 feet of Jefferson Avenue north and south of the intersection will have to be revised. This will include revisions to the street improvement plans, drainage improvements for the property located on the southwest corner of the intersection, landscape improvements to the west side of Jefferson Avenue just southerly of the intersection, additional field design, and preparation of slope easement documents. Subtotal: $6,900.00 -1 - r:%egdrpt%94%O426%CFD88-12.Ad71ejp ITEM 2: EMWD Sewer Relocation The existing 12 inch sewer main crossing the I-15 is in conflict with the proposed construction of the Overland Drive bridge crossing. The sewer main which is approximately 800 feet long, is in an easement which is within the future alignment for the overcrossing and must be relocated. This work will be designed on separate plans to EMWD standards and will recluire minimal field design survey. The preparation and processing of easement documents is also included. Subtotal: $14,900.00 Item 3: ACS Parking Relocation The present right-of-way alignment for the overcrossing will require the reconstruction of Advance Cardiovascular Systems' (ACS) parking and on-site traffic circulation facilities. This area is adjacent to the northerly property line and is approximately 1,100 feet long. It is assumed that this work can be accomplished as a plot plan that will be prepared for City review. Subtotal: $3,700.00 Item 4: Alignment Revisions The alignment for the overcrossing was prepared based on the approved submittals to Caltrans. However, changes were requested to the geometrics by Caltrans from the approved PSR and previous plan submittals. The bridge structure over the freeway is partially in a curve, which Caltrans requested be removed. This will require detailed revisions to the layout, profile, and drainage plans. The amount of the contract revision is $30,000. The revisions to the structural design and Advanced Planning studies will also require an additional $10,000 to complete these necessary changes. Subtotal: $40,000 Item 5: Scope Expansion The base contract provided for 51 sheets at a .fee of $242,144. The actual sheet count is 61. A straight line interpolation of the revised contract amount is $289,624, · difference of $47,480. We agree to absorb a portion of the overage, however, an increase of $22,000 will be necessary to cover the cost for preparing the plan sheets. Subtotal: $22,000 Item 6: Existing Landscape Inventory A field inventory will be performed of the existing landscaping and irrigation systems at the project site due to the lack of existing as-built information. The information that was available was not adequate to complete our assignment. Our original scope of work assumed that sufficient as-built information would be available to us so that the landscape and irrigation -2- r:%egdrpt~94%0426~CFD88-12.Ad71ejp plans could be developed for the project. Therefore, field inventories and plans will be required to gain approval from Caltrens. Subtotal: $16,888 Item 7: Levd of Service Analysis Level of Service (LOS) analysis will be provided for all main lane sections, intersections, ramps, merge, diverge and weaving sections. This effort will include obtaining the necessary traffic count data (assuming it is all available without performing actual field counts), performing the evaluations for the various conditions, preparing data spreadsheets and providing the necessary tables and text. Subtotal: $2,500 TOTAL AMOUNT: $106,888.00 FISCAL IMPACT: All of the above costs are eligible for funding through Community Facilities District 88-12. Adequate funds are available within the budget of the District. The total cost of this element of the project is summarized below: A. Approved Contract $ 622,534 B. Amendment per CO #424 17,800 C. Amendment No. 5 9,320 D. Proposed Amendment No. 7 106.888 Total: $ 756.542 Attachment: Amendr~ent No. 7, J.F. Davidson Associates -3- r:%egdrpt~94%O426~CFD88-12.Ad71ejp AMENDMENT NO. 7 J.F. DAVIDSON ASSOCIATES CONTRACT ORDER NO. 0155 The Agreement dated December 13, 1990 between the City of Temecula, and J.F. Davidson Associates (herein referred to as "Agreement") is hereby amended as follows: RE: Professional Design Service for CFD 99-12, Overland Drive Crossing Section I The Scope of Work is hereby amended by adding the following activities: I. Scope of Services The additional costs detailed in the following section for the Overland Drive Overcrossing · Improvement Project were arrived at during the design review process with Caltrans. The following items of work are being .performed as a result of a change in the approach grade to the bridge crossing at Jefferson Avenue, and other items of work. The following are the various items of work the necessary to complete the engineering plans and specification for the Overland Drive Overcrossing. ITEM 1: Jefferson Avenue Improvements Due to the revised grade on Overland Drive at Jefferson Avenue approximately 1,000 feet of Jefferson Avenue north and south of the intersection will have to be revised., This will include revisions to the street improvement plans, drainage improvements for the property located on the southwest corner of the intersection, landscape improvements to the west side of Jefferson Avenue just southerly of the intersection, additional field design, and preparation of slope easement documents. Subtotal: $6,900.00 ITEM 2: EMWD Sewer Relocation The existing 12 inch sewer main crossing the I-15 is in conflict with the proposed construction of the Overland Drive bridge crossing. The sewer main which is approximately 800 feet long, is in an easement which is within the future alignment for the overcrossing and must be relocated; This work will be designed on separate plans to EMWD standards and will require minimal field design survey. The preparation and processing of easement documents is also included. Subtotal: $14,900.00 Item 3: ACS Parking Relocation The present right-of-way alignment for the overcrossing will require the reconstruction of Advance Cardiovascular Systems' (ACS) parking and on-site traffic circulation facilities. This -4- r:\agdrpt~.94~0426~CFD88-12.Ad71ajp area is adjacent to the northerly property line and is approximately 1,100 feet long. It is assumed that this work can be accomplished as a plot plan that will be prepared for City review, Subtotal: $3,700.00 Item 4: Alignment Revisions The alignment for the overcrossing was prepared based on the approved submittals to Caltrans. However, changes were requested to the geometrics by Caltrans from the approved PSR and previous plan submittals. The bridge structure over the freeway is partially in a curve, which Caltrans requested be removed. This will require detailed revisions to the layout, profile, and drainage plans. The amount of the contract revision is $30,000. The revisions to the structural design and Advanced Planning studies will also require an additional $10,000 to complete these necessary changes, Subtotal: $40,000 Item 5: Scope Expansion The base contract provided for 51 sheets at a fee of $242,144. The actual sheet count is 61. A straight line interpolation of the revised contract amount is $289,624, a difference of $47,480. We agree to absorb a portion of the overage, however, an increase of $22,000 will be necessary to cover the cost for preparing the plan sheets. Subtotal: $22,000 Item 6: Existing Landscape Inventory A field inventory will be performed of the existing landscaping and irrigation systems at the project site due to the lack of existing as-built information. The information that was available was not adequate to complete our assignment. Our original scope of work assumed that sufficient as-built information would be available to us so that the landscape and irrigation plans could be developed for the project, Therefore, field inventories and plans will be required to gain approval from Caltrans. Subtotal: $16,888 Item 7: Level of Service Analysis Level of Service (LOS) analysis will be provided for all main lane sections, intersections, ramps, merge, diverge and weaving sections. This effort will include obtaining the necessary traffic count data (assuming it is all available without performing actual field counts), performing the evaluations for the various conditions, preparing data spreadsheets and providing the necessary tables and text. Subtotal: $2,500 TOTAL AMOUNT: $106,888.00 -6- r:~gdrpt%94%O426%CFD88-12.Ad71ajp Section 2 Compension shall be for all services described in this Amendment and shall not exceed One Hundred Six Thousand Eight Hundred Eight-Eight Dollars ($106,888.00) All of the above costs are eligible for funding through Community Facilities District 88-12. Adequate funds are available within the budget of the District. The total cost of this element of the project is summarized below: A. Approved Contract $ 622,534 B. Amendment per CO #424 17,800 C. Amendment No. 5 9,320 D. Proposed Amendment No. 7 106,888 Total: $ 756,542 Section 3 All other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain the same. The parties hereto have executed this Admendment No. 7 to the Agreement on the Date and year above written. CONSULTANT CITY OF TEMECULA By: By: J.Fo Davidson Associates Ron Roberts, Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney, ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk -6- r:%agdrpt%94~O426%CFD88-12.Ad71ajp ITEM APPROVAL CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City-Manager/City Council Mary Jane McLarney, Finance Officer April 26, 1994 Conversion of City Vehicle to Alternative Fuel Source PREPARED BY: Genie Roberrs, Chief Accountant RECOMMENDATION: 1. Approve conversion of one (1) vehicle to propane. e Appropriate $2,100 for the cost of conversion in the new AB 2766 Fund (account number 150-199-999-5250). DISCUSSION: The City Council has directed staff to convert new city vehicles to propane fuel whenever possible. In the past, the City has converted five (5) vehicles to propane fuel. The conversion was performed by Petrolane, the only local company specializing in this service and City staff has been satisfied with the performance of the converted vehicles. The City has recently purchased a vehicle for use in the recreation division which could be converted to propane at a cost of $2,100. FISCAL IMPACT: The cost to convert one (1) vehicle to propane would be $2,100. Staff is recommending an appropriation in the new AB 2766 Fund to cover this expenditure in account number 150-199-999-5250. It is possible for the City to utilize funds collected from AB 2766 revenues which are disbursed by the Department of Motor Vehicles to agencies that adopt ordinances expressing a commitment to spend the revenues to reduce air pollution from mobile sources. The City has $69,913 available in AB 2766 fund balance to date. ITEM 20 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY~ FINANCE OFFIC CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City CounciUCity Manager Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer April 26, 1994 Accept Public Improvements and substitute Agreements in Tract No. 22715-F Bonds and PREPARED BY: ~ Albert Crisp, Permit Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council ACCEPT the Public Improvements in Tract No. 22715-F, AUTHORIZE the reduction in Faithful Performance Street, and Water and Sewer Bond amounts, ACCEPT the substitute Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Bond riders, and DIRECT the City Clerk to so advise the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors. BACKGROUND: On September 12, 1989, the Riverside County Board of Supervisors entered into subdivision agreements with: Tayco (Joint Venture of Taylor Woodrow Homes & Costain Homes, Inc.) 4921 Birch Street, Suite 110 Newport Beach, CA 92660 for the improvement of streets, installation of sewer and water systems, and subdivision monumentation. Accompanying the subdivision agreements were surety bonds issued by American Home Assurancey Company as follows: 1. Bond No. PB 30011345 in the amount of $432,000 to cover street improvements. e Bond No. PB 30011345 in the amount of $83,500 to cover water improvements. Bond No. PB 30011345 in the amount of $34,500 to cover sewer improvements. e Bond No. PB 30011345 in the amount of $275,000 to cover material and labor for street, water, and sewer improvements. pw01%egdrpt%94%0426%tr2271S-F 0413 5. Bond No. PB 30011346 in the amount of $15,000 to cover subdivision monumentation. Effective December 31, 1993, Costein Homes Inc. withdrew from the joint venture partnership. The name of the new partnership is Tayco, a California General Partnership (comprised of Taylor Woodrow Homes California Limited, a California Corporation, and Taylor Woodrow Real Estate, a California Corporation). A new agreement has been executed by the partnership and riders to the Bonds have been submitted for City Council acceptance. The following items have been completed by the developer in accordance with the approved plans. Street, drainage, sewer and water improvements within Tract No. 22715-F. Staff has inspected and verified the public improvements and the Public Works Department recommends acceptance of the work, reduction in bond amounts to the I O-percent warranty level, and initiation of the one-year warranty period. Therefore, it is appropriate to reduce the Faithful Performance Bond amounts as follows: Streets/Drainage $388,800 Water: $ 75,150 Sewer: $ 31,050 The subdivider is submitting riders to the Faithful Performance Bonds for warranty purposes in the following amounts: Streets/Drainage: Water: Sewer: Bond No. PB 30011345 $ 43,200 Bond No. PB 30011345 $ 8,350 Bond No. PB 30011345 $ 3.450 TOTAL = $ 55,000 The Monumentation Bond will remain in place until the Survey Monumentation is completed and approved. The developer was required to post Material and Labor Bonds to ensure payment to suppliers and workers. These bonds are maintained in effect for a period of time determined by statute after the Governmental Agency has accepted the public improvements. The affected streets are Corte Las Cruces and Corte Santa Catalina, and a portion of Butterfield Stage Road and Rancho Vista Road. Attachment: Location Map Riders to Faithful Performance Bonds Substitute Agreement pw01 ~gdrpt~94~O426~tr22715-F 0413 11~a,¢.~ ~0. 22'r~5'2 PROJFCT f TRACT NO. 22715- F Location Map ITEM NO. 21 APPROV~xT. CITY MANAGER TO: FROM:, DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer April 26, 1994 Accept Public Improvements and substitute Agreements in Tract No. 22715-2. Bonds and PREPARED BY: ~"Albert RECOMMENDATION: Crisp, Permit Engineer That the City Council ACCEPT the Public Improvements in Tract No. 22715-2, AUTHORIZE the reduction in Faithful Performance Street, and Water and Sewer Bond amounts, ACCEPT the substitute Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Bond riders, and DIRECT the City Clerk to so advise the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors. BACKGROUND: On August 1, 1989, the Riverside County Board of Supervisors entered into subdivision agreements with: Tayco (Joint Venture of Taylor Woodrow Homes & Cosrain Homes, Inc.) 4921 Birch Street, Suite 110 Newport Beach, CA 92660 for the improvement of streets, installation of sewer and water systems, and subdivision monumentation. Accompanying the subdivision agreements were surety bonds issued by American Home Assurance Company as follows: 1. Bond No. PB 30011134in the amount of $472,000to cover street improvements. 2. Bond No. PB 30011134 in the amount of $116,500 to cover water improvements. 3. Bond No. PB 30011134 in the amount of $100,500 to cover sewer improvements. e Bond No. PB 30011134 in the amount of $344,500,to cover material and labor for street, water, and sewer improvements. %pwO1%egd~pt%94%O426%tr22715-2 0413 5. Bond No. PB 30011135 in the amount of $24,600 to cover subdivision monumentation. Effective December 31, 1993, Costein Homes Inc. withdrew from the joint venture partnership. The name of the new partnership is Tayco, a California General Partnership (comprised of Taylor Woodrow Homes California Limited, · California Corporation, and Taylor Woodrow Real Estate, a California Corporation). A new agreement has been executed by the partnership and riders to the Bonds have been submitted for City Council acceptance. The following items have been completed by the developer in accordance with the approved plans. Street, drainage, sewer and water improvements within Tract No. 22715-2. Staff has inspected and verified the public improvements and the Public Works Department recommends acceptance of the work, reduction in bond amounts to the I O-percent warranty level, end initiation of the one-year warranty period. Therefore, it is appropriate to reduce the Faithful Performance Bond amounts as follows: Streets/Drainage ~424,800 Water: $104,850 Sewer:- ~ 90,450 The subdivider is submitting riders to the Faithful Performance Bonds for warranty purposes in the following amounts: Streets/Drainage: Bond No. PB 30011345 $ 47,200 Water: Bond No. PB 30011345 $11,650- Sewer: Bond No. PB 30011345 $10.050 TOTAL -- $ 68,900 The Monumentation Bond will remain in place until the Survey Monumentation is completed and approved. The developer was required to post Material end Labor Bonds to ensure payment to suppliers and workers. These bonds are maintained in effect for e period of time determined by statute after the Governmental Agency has accepted the public improvements. The affected streets ere Corte Coronado, Corte Chatada, and San Vincente, and a portion of Butterfield Stage Road, Rancho Vista Road, and Calle Resaca. Attachment: Location Map Riders to Faithful Performance 'Bonds Substitute Agreement. %pwO1 ~agdrpt%94%O426%tr22715-2 0413 ( #at /Z'3f'E (ZZ4S.4f) ?,27.~5-- ! P, OF PROJECT TRACT NO. 22715-2 Location Map ITEM NO. 22 APPROVAT. CITY 'MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager --~ Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer April 26, 1994 Accept Public Improvements and substitute Agreements in Tract No. 22716-3. Bonds and 0v- PREPARED BY: ~';'~'-AI f~ bert RECOMMENDATION: Crisp, Permit Engineer That the City Council ACCEPT the Public Improvements in Tract No. 22716-3, AUTHORIZE the reduction in Faithful Performance Street, and Water and Sewer Bond amounts, ACCEPT the substitute Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Bond riders, and DIRECT the City Clerk to so advise the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors. BACKGROUND: On October 24, 1989, the Riverside County Board of Supervisors entered into subdivision agreements with: Tayco (Joint Venture of Taylor Woodrow Homes & Costain Homes, Inc.) 4921 Birch Street, Suite 110 Newport Beach, CA 92660 for the improvement of streets, installation of sewer and water systems, and subdivision monumentation. Accompanying the subdivision agreements were surety bonds issued by American Home Assurance Company as follows: Bond No. P8 30011382 in the amount of $193,000 to cover street improvements. 2. Bond No. PB 30011382 in the amount of $50,000 to cover water improvements. 3. Bond No. PB 30011382 in the amount of $50,000 to cover sewer improvements. e Bond No. PB 30011382 in the amount of $146,000to cover material and labor for street, water, and sewer improvements. pw01 ~egdrpt'tg4'tO426'ttr22716.-3 0413 5. Bond No. PB 30011383 in the amount of ~13,700 to cover subdivision monumentstion. Effective December 31, 1993, Cosrain Homes Inc. withdrew from the joint venture partnership. The name of the new partnership is Tayco, a California General Partnership (comprised of Taylor Woodrow Homes California Limited, a California Corporation, and Taylor Woodrow Real Estate, a California Corporation). A new agreement has been executed by the partnership and riders to the Bonds have been submitted for City Council acceptance. The following items have been completed by the developer in accordance with the approved plans. Street, drainage, sewer and water improvements within Tract No. 22716-3. Staff has inspected and verified the public improvements and the Public Works Department ' recommends acceptance of the work, reduction in bond amounts to the I O-percent warranty level, and initiation of the one-year warranty period. Therefore, it is' appropriate to reduce the Faithful Performance' Bond amounts as follows: Streets/Drainage ~ 173,700 Water: ~ 45,000 Sewer: $ 45,000 The subdivider is submitting riders to the Faithful Performance Bonds for warranty purposes in the following amounts: Streets/Drainage: Water: Sewer: Bond No. PB 30011382 S 19,300 Bond No. PB 30011345 $ 5,000 Bond No. PB 30011345 $ 5,000 TOTAL = $ 29,300 The Monumentation Bond will remain in place until the Survey Monumentation is completed and approved. The developer was required to post Material and Labor Bonds to ensure payment to suppliers and workers. These bonds are maintained in effect for a period of time determined by statute after the Governmental Agency has accepted the public improvements. The affected streets are Corte Soledad, Corte Amalia, and Via Asturias. Attachment: Location Map, Riders to Faithful Performance Bonds Substitute Agreement pwO1~egdrpt~94~O426~tr22716-3 0413 II \ 1 PROJECT SITE TRACT NO. 22716-3 TRACT NO. 22716- 3 Location Map ITEM N O. 2 3 APPROVAL 'TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager -'//l~"~Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer April 26, 1994 Accept Public Improvements in Tract No. 21674-3 PREPARED BY: Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council ACCEPT the Public Improvements in Tract No. 21674-3, AUTHORIZE the reduction of Faithful Performance Street, Sewer and Water Improvement Securities, APPROVE the subdivision agreement rider, and DIRECT the City Clerk to so advise the Surety and Developer. BACKGROUND: On January 9, 1990, the City Council approved Final Tract Map No. 21674-3. Agreements and Faithful Performance and Material Labor Bonds were filed by: Mesa Homes (Now Kemper Community Development Company) 27555 Ynez Road, Suite 202 Temecula, Ca 92591 For the installation of street, sewer and water improvements~ Accompanying the subdivision agreements were surety bonds issued in the following amounts by: Lumbermane Mutual Assurance Company Bond No. 3S 687 481 00 in the amount of $310,500to cover street improvements. Bond No. 3S 687 482 00 in the amount of $42,000 to cover water improvements. Bond No. 3S 687 483 O0 in the amount of $53,000 to cover sewer improvements. -1 - pwO 1 ~,egdrpt'%94%O405%tr216743 Bond No. 3S 687 484 00 in the amount of $12,200to cover subdivision monumentation. Bonds No. 3S 687 481 00, 3S 687 482 00, end 3S 687 483 00 in the amounts of 9155,250.00, 921,000.00 end .926,500, respectively, to cover material end labor amounts for street, water and sewer improvements. The following items have been completed by the developer in accordance with the approved plans: Required street, sewer, and water improvements within Tract No. 21674-3. The affected streets are Corts Encinas, and a portion of Meadows Parkway and of Paseo De Las Olas. The inspection and verification process relating to the above items has been completed by the City Staff, and the Public Works Department recommends the acceptance of the work and the initiation of the one-year warranty period. Therefore, it is appropriate to reduce these security amounts as follows: Streets: .9279 ~450 Water System: 37,800 Sewer System: 47,700 The remaining 10% of the original Faithful Performance security amounts are robe retained for a one (1) year guarantee/warranty period: Streets: Water System: Sewer System: Total: 931,050 4,200 5,300 940,550 The Monumentetion security will remain in place until the Survey Monumentation is. completed. The Material and Labor Bonds will remain in place until the statutory period for filing liens for material and labor claims has run. City Council authorizes release of these bonds/securities as well. Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Subdivision Agreement -2- pwO 1 ~agdrpt~94~0405~tr216743 Project Site ~"' TRACT ~1_~ ZI~ 74~--,,= · ) Location Map AGREEMENT REGARDING SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENTS THIS AGREEMENT, is by and between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CITY", and Mesa Homes ,8 California corp. hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR." WITNESSETH · WHEREAS,.ths County of Riverside and CONTRACTOR have entered into a series of agreements and CONTRACTOR has submitted a series of bonds in connection with consideration by the County of Riverside approval of final map no. 2167z.-3 ; WHEREAS, the CITY incorporated on December 1, 1989; . WHEREAS, in order to expeditiously process the acceptance of improvements pursuant to the final map, CITY has permitted subdividers to use the existing County Subdivision Agreement and Bond forms in lieu of CITY forms; WHEREAS, certain references in the County forms incorrectly refer to County positions instead of CITY positions; NOW; THI~REFORE, it is agreed between CITY and CONT. RACTOR as follows: 1. All references to the "County of Riverside" contained in of the documents between CITY and CONTRACTOR concerning said tract number are now defined 8s referring to the "City of Temecula." 2. All references to the "Riverside County Road Commissioner" contained in any documents between CITY and CONTRACTOR concerning said tract number are now hereby defined to refer to the 'City Engineer.' -1- pwO2~gtntsVnlstm,e~mubdiv.lmp 080392 3. All references to any other Riverside County offices or positions contained in the Agreements or Bonds concerning said tract number now hereby refer to the equivalent CITY offices or positions. Dated: 3/10/94 CONTRACTQ ~mes By Si "" William M. Butler Print or Tyge NAME President Prim or Type TITLE Dated: C/TY OI~ TEMECULA By Ron Roberrs, Mayor Dated: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Dated: ATTEST: NOTARY JURAT: By June S.' Greek, City Clerk To be attached below or can be by separate sheet attached hereto. '2- PwO2~egmte~neeterm%,ubdivJmp 080392 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COLrNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) On March 10, 1994, before me Cynthia (3. Zajd, personally appeared William M. Butler, personally known to me to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity, and that by his/her/their signature on the instrument the person(s) or the entity upon behalf of which theperson(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature AGREEMENT REGARDING SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENTS THIS AGREEMENT, is by and between The City of Temecula, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CITY", and Mesa Homes ,8 California corp, hereinafter referred to as 'CONTRACTOR." WITNESSETH WHEREAS, the County of Riverside and CONTRACTOR have antered into a Series of agreements and CONTRACTOR has submitted a series of bonds in connection with consideration by the County of Riverside approval of final map no. 2.1_674-3. ; WHEREAS, the CITY incorporated on December 1, 1'989; 'WHEREAS, in order to expeditiously process the acceptance of improvements pursuant to the final map. CITY has permitted subdividers to use the existing County Subdivision Agreement end Bond forms in lieu of CITY forms; WHEREAS, certain references in the County forms incorrectly refer to County positions instead of CITY positions; NOW. THEREFORE, it is agreed between CITY and CONTRACTOR as follows: 1. All references to the 'County of Riverside" contained in of the documents between CITY end CONTRACTOR concerning said tract number are now defined as referring to the "City of Temecula." 2. All references to the 'Riverside County Road Commissioner' contained in any documents between CITY and CONTRACTOR concerning said tract number are now hereby defined to refer to the 'City Engineer." ol- ewO2%e~nts%rnestere%mabdiv.img 080392 3. All references to any other Riverside County offices or positions contained in the-,~ Agreements or Bonds concerning said tract number now hereby refer to the equivalent CIT~ offices or positions. Dated: 3/10/94. N~~~~rues William M. Butler Pdnt or Type NAME President Prim or Type TITLE Dated: CITY OI;: TEMECULA By Ron RoberrS, Mayor Dated: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Dated: ATTEST: NOTARY JURAT: By June S. Greek, City Clerk To be attached below or can be by separate sheet attached hereto. '2- PwO2~agmtm%rneetere~eubdlv.lmp 010392 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE on March 10, 1994, before me Cynthia G. Zajd, personally appeared William M. Butler, personally known to me to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity, and that by his/her/their signature on the instntment the person(s) or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature '~ CYNTHIA G. ZAJD ~ RIVERSIDE COUNTY ,.~ Notary Public California commission expires Oct. 140 1994 ITEM NO. 24 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: RECOMMENDATION: 1. City Manager/City Council City Attorney April' 26, 1994 Proposed Ordinance re Charitable, Religious and Commercial Solicitation That the City Council: Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 94-._ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA REPEALING PORTIONS OF ORDINANCE NO. 90-04 PERTAINING TO COMMER- CIAL AND CHARITABLE SOLICITATIONS AND ADDING CHAPTER 5.16 TO THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS FOR CHARITA- BLE, RELIGIOUS AND COMMERCIAL SOLICITATIONS 2. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94--- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING A NON-REFUNDABLE PERMIT APPLICATION FEE FOR CHARITA-. BLE, RELIGIOUS, AND COMMERCIAL SOLICITATION WITHIN THE CITY OF TEMECULA DISCUSSION: During last year, the City was contacted by s resident regarding city regulations of charitable and commercial solicitations. The resident requested the City consider adopting an ordinance prohibiting door-to-door solicitations after sunset. Upon examining the current County Ordinances regulating solicitation as adopted by the City, it was determined that the County Ordinances required updating because this area of the law has changed due to Court decisions imposing Constitutional limitations on R:~iee~l~.e~e~hmtty.e~l I Agende Report - Charitable, Religious Contributions Ordinance April 26, 1994 Page 2. solicitation ordinances· The attached Ordinance incorporates those standards established by the Courts for regulating commercial and non-commercial solicitation. The main feature of the'proposed Ordinance is the issuance of a permit prior to solicitation activity being conducted within the City. The information required to be on the application for such a permit conforms to Constitutional standards. In addition, the City Manager has no discretion to grant or deny a permit based on the purpose of the proposed activity· The proposed Ordinance also contains specific time limitations in which the City is required to act on the issuance or denial of the permit and sets forth an appeal process to the City Council in which an applicant can appeal the decision by the City Manager. This procedure satisfies due process requirements and is designed to minimize the legal challenges that often arise in this area of regulation· There is an application fee in an amount to be fixed by Resolution of the City Council to offset the administrative costs of processing the permit application. However, due to First revoked, and, upon expiration of the permit, the former perml~ hulder ,,ay apply for a new permit in the same manner as a new applicant. The information submitted on the application is forwarded to the Sheriff's Office for recommendation of approval or denial of the permit. However, the permit must be issued unless there are specific facts justifying a denial such as the applicant has submitted an incorrect or incomplete application and has failed to correct it when requested to do so or the applicant has, within the last five (5) years, had a judgment rendered against him or her as a defendant guilty of certain specified crimes (i.e., murder, robbery, assault, criminal battery, rape, arson, burglary or possession of a deadly weapon). The proposed Ordinance includes the following exemptions from the operation of its provisions: Any person having a fixed place of business within the City; Solicitation by any organization from its own members; Solicitation by a person when such activity occurs on premises owned or controlled by the solicitor or with the permission of the person-who owns or controls the premises; Solicitation conducted solely by means of radio or television broadcast or solely by means or newspapers or magazines or solely by direct solicitation by United States mail; R:~eendaup~hemy.ed 2 ~ Agenda Report - Charitable, Religious Contributions Ordinance April 26, 1994 · Page 3. 5. A volunteer who receives no compensation of any type from, or in connection with, a solicitation by a charitable organization which is tax exempt and who is eighteen (18) years of age or younger. (This exemption encompasses established organizations such as Girl Scout cookie sales and certain sports organizations which have non-profit status.); and 6. Solicitation for a political purpose. The manner of solicitation is regulated by incorporating and expanding the disclosure requirements contained in the State's Charitable Disclosure Law in the proposed Ordinance. Solicitation is also regulated by prohibiting solicitation at any house, apartment, dwelling, commercial establishment or any retail establishment under five (5) acres which posts a sign and a map indicating that no soliciting is desired on the premises. Our research indicates that large shopping centers are considered "public forums" by the Courts and thus, are subject to First Amendment Constitutional restrictions, Therefore, a total prohibition on solicitation in such centers would probably not withstand judicial scrutiny. The Ordinance also prohibits solicitation at any dwellings where a homeowner's association has posted "NO SOLICITING" notices and a map depicting the areas within the association. The proposed Ordinance does not include the type of restrictions requested by the resident regarding hours of solicitation because a California Appellate Court has ruled that a county ordinance restricting hours of door-to-door soliciting violated the solicitor's First Amendment rights. Finally, the proposed Ordinance requires that any individual receiving money or anything of value in excess of five dollars ($5.00) from any contributor by means of a solicitation must present, upon request, a written receipt to the contributor. A violation of the Ordinance constitutes a violation of the Temecula Municipal Code and is subject to the enforcement and prosecution procedures set forth in Sections 1.01.200 through 1.01.230, inclusive. FISCAL IMPACTS: ATTACHMENTS: Proposed Ordinance Proposed Resolution ORDINANCE NO. 94__ ~ AN ORDINANCE OF TV~ CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TI~IECULA REPE, a-LING PORTIONS OF ORDINANCE NO. 9004 PERTAINING TO COMMERCIAL AND CHARITABLE SOLICITATIONS AND ADDING CHAFIER S.16 TO THE ~ MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABI,ISI1TING REGULATIONS FOR CHARITABLE, RELIGIOUS AND COMMERCIAL SOLICITATIONS. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMF, C~ DOES HERBBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. City Ordinance No. 9004 adopted by reference certain portions of the non- codi~ed Riverside County Ordinances. On the effective date of this Ordinance, Riverside County Ordinance Nos. 217 and 542, adopted by reference by City Ordinance No. 90-04, rehting to regulating Charitable Solicitations and the Peddling of Goods, Wares, Merchandise, Fruits and Vegetables are hereby repealed. Section 2. The purpose of this Ordinance is to safeguard the public within Temecula against fraud, deceit and imposition, and to foster and encourage fair solicitations for charitable purposes wherein the person from whom the money is being solicited will know which organizations have applied for and received a valid permit for solicitation from the City of Temecuh. This Ordinance will promote legitimate solicitations for charitable purposes and, therefore, will promote the public's safety and welfare. Section 3. Chapter 5.16 is hereby added to the Temecula Municipal Code to read as follows: "CHAPTER 5.16 Charitable, Religious and Commercial Solicitations 5.16.010 DEFINITIONS. As used in this Chapter, the following terms shall have meanings as set forth below. A. "Contribution" means the giving of anything of value, including money, property or any other type of financial assistance, or the pledging of anything of value, including money, property or any other type of financial assistance, or the purchasing or offering to purchase anything of value or not, including, but not limited to goods, services, books, pamphlets, tickets, R:~Ords',64 1 '~'-,, subscriptions to publications, upon the implied or express representation that the proceeds, or a portion thereof, of the gift, pledge, or purchase will be used for a charitable purpose. B. *Charitable purpose* means the purpose of any nonprofit organization, including paU'iofic, philanthropic social services, welfare, benevolent, educational, religious, civic or fraternal, either actual or purported. The term "charitable purpose" does not include any bona fide political purpose. C. *Commercial solicitation' means the: 1. Selling, peddling, or the soliciting, canvassing or taking orders for goods, wares, newspapers, magazines, books, merchandise, services, including real estate, or any other items or exchanges of value; 2. Conducting a survey or poll; 3. Distribulion of advertising material or samples where the person distributing the material or samples enters the property of another or makes or attempts to make contact or discuss the material or samples with the person to receive it. D. "Permit Holder" means the person who has applied for a permit which has been granted and the orgavintion or group on whose behalf solicitations will be made. E. 'Peddling' means selling merchandise which is transported from place to place in the course of approaching prospective customers or selling merchandise or services from door to door. A 'peddler' is a person who engages in peddling. F. "Solicit" and "solicitation" means the request, directly or indirectly, for any contribution used for a charitable purpose or commercial solicitation as defined in this section, conducted door-to-door, in any phce of public accommodation, in any place of business open to the public generally, on the city streets and sidewalks, in the public parks, or in any public place. A 'solicitation* shall be complete when the request is made, whether or not the person making the request receives any contribution. G. *Person * means any individual, pannership, corporation, or association, including any finn, company, society, organization, church, congregation, assembly or league, and shall include any director, officer, trustee, receiver, assignee, agent or other similar representative thereof. ~ R:~Ords~64 2 H. *Fixed place of business* means any place where goods, wares, merchandise or service is offea'ed to the public or such goods, wares, and merchandise axe stored for commercial purposes providing the operation of such business is not in viohtion of any applicable Land Use, building, public health, or any applicable business license hw where such fixed place of business has been operated for a period of at least sixty' (60) days prior to application for any license for peddlin~ or soliciting on the site in question. I. "City Manager" means that person whose duties and responsibilities are described in Sections 2.12,030 and 2.12,080 of this Code, or any person designated by the City Manager as the person's representative. 5.16.020 PERMYf REQUIRED. Except as provided in Section 5.16.070, it shall be unlawful for any person to directly or indirectly solicit contributions in any open public place or door to door, in any residential area for any charitable, religious, or commercial purpose within the City of Temecula without first having secured a valid permit therefor as herein provided. 5.16;030 APPLICATION FOR P~.RM1T. Any person required by this Chapter to have a permit shall submit a written application in duplicate together with a fee in an amount to be fixed by Resolution of the City Council of the City of Temecula. The application fee is to compensate the City for the cost of administering this Chapter, and such fee is not refundable if the permit is not issued. Said application shall be verified and shah contain the foilowing information: A. The California drivcr's license number, full name, address, picture, telephone number, and date of birth of the applicant and the identity of each person doing the proposed solicitation. In the event there is .more than one person doing the proposed solicitation, then each person shall submit a separate application under this Section. There shall be a five ($5.00) dollar fee for each additional person doing the solicitation; B. If the applicant is not an individual, or will be soliciting on behalf of an organization or institution,. the names and addresses of the organiza~on's or institu~on's principal officers and executives, and the address of the national, state and local headquarters, if any; C. The purpose for which the proceeds of the solicitations are to be used; D. The amount, stated as a percentage of the Wtal gift or purchase price, that will be used for charitable purposes. E. If paid fund-raisen are paid a set fee rather than a percentage of the total mount raised, the card shah show the total cost that is estimated will be used for direct fund-raising F. If the solicitation is not a sale solicitation, the card may state, in place of the mount of fund-raising expenses, that an audited financial statement of these expenses may be obtained by contacting the org3niTation at the address disclosed. G. The non-m-exempt status of the organization or fund, if the orgsnintion or fund for which the money or funds are being solicited does not have a charitable tax exemption under both federal and state hw. H. The percentage of the total gift or purchase price which'may be deducted as a charitable contribution under both federal and state law. ff no portion is so deductible, the card shall state that 'This contribution is not tax deductible.' I. If the orgsnir-~tion making the solicitation represents any nongovernmental organization by any name which includes, but is not limited to, the term *officer,' 'peace officer,* *police,* *hw enforcement,* *reserve officer,' *deputy,* *California Highway Patrol,* *Highway Patrol,* or * deputy sheriff, * which would reasonably be understood to imply that the organization is composed of hw enforcement personnel, the soliciWr shall give the total number of members in the organization and the number of members working or living within the county where the solicitation is being made, and if the solicitation is for advertising, the statewide circulation of the publication in which the solicited ad will appear.. J. If the organization making the .solicitation represents any nongovernmental organization by any name which includes, but is not limited to, the term *veteran* or *veterans,' which would reasonably be understood to imply that the organization is composed of veterans, the solicitor shall give the total number of members in the organization and the number of members working or living within the county where the solicitation is being made. This paragraph does not apply to federally chartered or state incorporated veterans' organizations with 200 or more dues paying members or to a thrift store operated or controlled by a federally chartered or state incorporated veterans' organization. This paragraph does not apply to any state incorporated community based orga.ni~,-'~fion that provides direct services to veterans and their families and qualifies as a m-exempt organization under Section 501(c)(3) or 501(c)(19) of the Internal Revenue Code and Section 23701d of the Revenue and Taxation Code. K. The place and date of any court judgment rendered against the applicant as a ~ R.:XOrdsX64 4 defendant guilty of any serious felony as defined in California Penal Code Section 1192.7(c), theft as defined in California Penal Code Section 484 or attempt to commit any of the aforementioned crimes; L. A designation of the location or locations at which place or places the applicant proposes to solicit and the dates and time of the activity. M. Permits shall be issued for periods of ~ (2) months ~nless revoked, or suspended pmuant to the provisions of this Chapter. Upon exphaaou of'the permit, the former permit holder may apply for a new permit in the same manner as a new applicant except that if the permit holder applies for a new permit before the old permit expires, the old permit shall remain in force until the City either approves or denies the application for 'the new permit. N. Upon obtaining a permit issued pursuant to this section, the permit holder shall keep the application information current by notifying the City in writing of any change or occurrence in the information listed above which would affect or change the status of the permit. Permit holder shall notify the City Manager in writing thereof within 24 .hours after such change. O. Nothing set forth'in this Chapter shall be construed as granting to the City Manager any discretion to grant, deny, suspend, revoke or renew any permit by reason of disapproval or agreement with the philosophy, opinion or belief of the applicant.. 5.16.040 SHEKIFF'S OFFICE RECOMMENDATION: ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT LIM/TATIONS. Upon the filing of the application required by SECTION 5.16.030 together with the fee(s), the City shall transmit one (1) copy to the Sheriffs office. The Sheriffs office shall report to the City Manager in writing recommending the approval or denial of the permit and stating the reasons therefor. The Sheriffs Office shall recommend approval of the permit unless there are specific facts justifying denial. Such facts may include but are not limited to the grounds for denial in Sections 5.16.040(a) through (c). .The City Manager shall issue the pormit within twenty (20) days after the application is filed. The City Manager shall issue the permit unless he/she finds that: A. The applicant has submitted an incorrect and incomplete application, 'and the applicant fails to correct the application after being requested to do so; B. The applicant has, within the past five (5) years, had a judgment rendered again him/her as a defendant guilty of any of those crimes set forth at Section 5.16.030. C. The place of the proposed permit activities is not in acawdance with the regulations set forth herein. A permit issued pursuant to this Chapter will authorize the permit holder to solicit for the charitable, religious or commercial purpose, and at the locations desigrmted in the application only. There sbsn be no permit activity until the permit is actually issued. 5.16.050 NON-TRANSFR'P, ABII.ITY OF PERMITS. No permit issued under this Chapter shall be transferred or assigned, and, any attempt at assignment or transfer shall be void. 5.16,060 EXEMPTIONS. The following are exempted from the operation of this Chapter. A. Any person having a fixed place of business within the City of Temecula; B. Solicitation by any organization from its members; C. Sob'citation by a person when such activity occurs on premises owned or controlled by the soliciWr or with the permission of the person who owns or controls the premises; D. Solicitation conducted solely by means of radio or television broadcasts or solely by means of newspapers or magazines or solely by direct solicitation by United States mail; E. Solicitation by any volunteer who receives no compensation of any type from, or ' in connection with, a charitable organization which has furnished proof that it has qualified for a tax exemption under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, and who 18 years of age or younger as certified by the organization; F. Solicitation conducted for a pelltical purpose. 5.16.070 I~-VOCATION OF PERMITS. Whenever it shah be shown that any person to whom a permit has been issued ~ R:XOnls~64 6 violated any of the provisions of this Chapter, or where such person has exhibited a pattern of practice to violate any of the provisions of this Chapter after being requested by the City to cease such violation(s), the City Manager, shah suspend the permit after giving written notice to the permit holder, of not less than two (2) business days, in person or by registered special delivery, postage prepaid and addressed to the permit holder at the address specified in the permit application or any amendment thereto, of the suspension and proposed revocation, stating with speci~city the reason therefor. The permit holder may fie with the City Manager, within ten (10) days of the delivery of the notice of suspension and proposed revocation, a written request for a hearing, which request shall have the effect of staying the suspension until the City Manager has rendered his decision, except in instances where said suspension is necessary to protect the public safety. The City Manager shall hold a hearing within ten (10) days after the filing of such request. At the hearing, the City Manager shall hear all relevant evidence, shall consider the merits of the proposed revocation, including any actions which have been taken to cure the alleged violation, and shall render a decision thereon within one (1) business day after the hearing. Said decision shall be communicated in writing to the permit holder within two (2) days thereafter and shall' state with specificity the reasons therefor. In the event that the permit holder does not request a hearing within ten (10) days after the delivery of the notice of suspension and proposed revocation, the permit shall be revoked and the revocation shall not be appealable. 5.16.080 APpI~.AI. TO CITY COUNCU.. In a case where the City Manager denies, revokes or refuses to renew a permit, any applicant or permit holder, within ten (10) days of the date of written notification of the disputed action may appeal such to the City Council. The appeal shall be in the form of a letter, filed with the City Clerk stating therein where there was error in the City Manager's decision. Any appeal shah be accompanied by the appropriate appeal fee established by Resolution of the City Council. The filing of such an appeal with the City Council shah not stay the action of the City Manager. The Council shall hear the appeal at its next regular meeting. At the time of the appeal hearing, the Council shah hear all relevant evidence and shah determine the merits of the appeal, and it shah render a decision thereon within three (3) business days after the hearing. Said decision shah be communicated in writing to the applicant within two (2) days. thereafter and shah state the reasons therefor. The decision of the City Council shah be fmai and conclusive. 5.16.090 MANNh':R OF SOIJCITATION: DISCt OSURF. REQUIREMENTS. R:\OulaX64 7 ~ OrgnniT~tiOn by any name which includes, but is not limited to, the term *officer,* *peace officer, * *police," *law enforcement," "reserve officer, * "deputy, * "California Highway Patrol, * "ttighway Patrol," or *deputy sheriff," which would reasonably be understood to imply that the organization is composed of law enforcement persounel, the solicitor shall give the total number of members in the organiT_~_~_on and the number of members working or living within the county where the solicitation is being 'made, and if the solicitation is for advertising, the statewide circulation of the publication in which the solicited ad will appea~. 9. If the organization making the solicitation represents any nongovernmental organization by any name which includes,~but is not limited to, the term *veteran* or "veterans,* which would reasonably be understood to imply that the organization is composed of veterans, the solicitor shah give the total number of members in the organization and the number of members working or living within the county where the solicitation is being made. This paragraph does not apply to federally chartered or state incorporated veterans' organizations with 200 or more dues paying members or to a thrift store operated or controlled by a federally chartered or state incorporated veterans' organization. This paragraph does not apply to any state incorporated community-based organization that provides direct services to veterans and their families and qualifies as a tax-exempt org~ni7ation under Section 501(c)(3) or 501(c)(19) of the Internal Revenue Code and Section 23701d of the Revenue and Taxation Code. B. Knowing and willful noncompliance by any individual volunteer who receives no compensation of any type from or in connection with a solicitation by any charitable organization shah subject the solicitor or seller to the penalties of the law. C. When the solicitation is not a sales solicitation, any individual volunteer who receives no compensation of any type from, or in connection with, a solicitation by any charitable organization may comply with the disclosure provisions by providing the name and address of the charitable organization on behalf of which all or any pan of the money collected will be tlti]iTed for charitable purposes, by stating the charitable purposes for which the solicitation is made, and by stating to the person solicited that information about revenues and expenses of the organization, including its administration and fund-raising costs, may be obtained by contacting the organization's office at the address disclosed. The organization shall provide this information to the person solicited within seven CO days after receipt .of the request. D. A volunteer who receives no compensation of any type from, or in connection with, a solicitation or sales solicitation by a charitable organization which has qualified for a tax exemption under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, and who is 18 years of age or younger, is not required to make any disclosures pursuant to this section. E. Upon request by the person from whom a contribution is sought, a valid A. Prior to' any solicitation or sales solicitation for charitable purposes, the solicitor or seller shall exhibit to the prospective donor or purchaser a card entitled *Solicitation or Sale for Charitable Purposes Card." The card shah be signed and dated under penalty of perjury by an individual who is a principal, staff member, or officer of the soliciting organization. The card shall give the name and address of the soliciting organization or the penon who signed the card and the name and business address of the paid individual who is doing the actual soliciting. In lieu of exhibiting a card, the solicitor or seller may distribute during the course of the solicitation any printed material, such as a solicitation brochure, provided such material complies with the standards set forth below, and pwvided that the solicitor or seller informs the prospective donor or purchaser that such information as required below is contained in the printed material. Information on the card or printed material. shall be presented in at least 10-point type and shall include the following: 1. The name and address of the combined campaign, each organintion, or fund on behalf of which.all or any part of the money collected will be utili,_sl for charitable purposes. 2. If there is no org~iT=tion or fund, the manner in which the money collected will be utilized for charitable purposes. 3. The mount, stated as a percentage of the wtal gift or purchase price, that will be used for charitable purposes. 4. If paid fund-raisers are paid a set fee rather than a percentage of the total mount raised, the card shall show the total cost that is estimated will be used for direct fund- raising expenses. 5. If the solicitation is not a sale solicitation, 'the card may state, in place of the mount of fund-raising expenses, that an audited financial statement of these expenses may be obtained by contacting the organization at the address disclosed. 6. The non-tax-exempt status of the organization or fund, if the organization or fund for which the money or funds are being solicited does not have a charitable tax exemption under both federal and state law. 7. The percentage of the total gift or purchase price which may be deducted as a charitable contribution under both federal and state hw. If no portion is so deductible, the card shall state that 'This contribution is not tax deductible." 8. ff the organization making the solicitation represents any nongovernmental R:\OntsMt4 reproduction of the permit issued pursuant to this Chapter shall be shown by the person seeking the contribution. 5.16.100 POSTING OF *NO SOI-ICITORS" NOTICF-q. A. Solicitations pursuant to permits issued under this Chapter shall not be made at any of the following locations: i. Any house, apartment, or other dwelling to which is affixed a sign or notice indicating "NO SOLICITORS" or any similar indication that no solicitation contact is desired by the occupants thereof. 2. Any. commercial establishment to which is affixed a sign or notice indicating "NO SOLICITORS" or any similar indication that no solicitation contact is desired by the occupants thereof and a map depicting the area within the commercial establishment where soliciting is pwhibited. 3. Any retail establishment under five (5) acres to which is affixed a sign or notice indicating "NO SOLICITORS" or any similar indication that no solicitation contact is desired by the occupants thereof and a map depicting the area within the retail establishment where soliciting is prohibited. B. Solicitations shall not be made at any house, apartment or other dwelling within a homeowner's association where: 1. The homeowner's association has posted on each entry way to the subdivision a sign or notice in substantially the following form: "Solicitation or Peddling at. any house, apartment or dwelling unit within the area on the below map is prohibited and subject to criminal prosecution and a fine of up to $1,000.O0"; to the notice; and A map depicting the area within the homeowner's association is attached 3. The homeowner's association has requested in writing that the City extend the provisions of this Chapter upon the homeowner's association's property. 5.16.110 RECEIPTS. ,Any person receiving money or anything of value in excess of five ($5.O0) dollars from ----- R:~OtdsX64 10 any contributor by means of a solicitation made pursuant to a permit shall, upon request, give such contributor a written receipt showing the name of the permit holder and the solicitor, the permit number, and the date and mount received. 16.120 VIOLATIONS. Any solicitation conducted without obtaining a permit as required by this Chapter shall constitute a violation of Section 1.01.200 of the Temecula Municipal Cede and be subject to the enforcement and prosecution procedures set forth at Sections 1.01.220 and 1.01.230.' Section 4. SEVERABILITY. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any sentence, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remninlng parts of this Ordinance. Section S. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its pns-_~__ve. A summary of this Ordinance shall be published in a newspaper published and circulated in said City at least five (5) days prior to the City Council meeting at which the proposed Ordinance is to be adopted. A certified copy of the full text of the proposed Ordinance shall be posted at City Hall. Within fifteen (15) days after adoption of the Ordinance, the. summary with the names of those City Council members voting for and against the Ordinance shall be published again, and the City Clerk shall post a certified copy of the full text of such adopted Ordinance. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of ,1994. Ron Roberrs, Mayor ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORN~ ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss. C1TY OF 'rEMECLmA ) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 94--- was duly introduced and placed upon its tint reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on'the __ day of ,1994, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the __ day of , 1994, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIMEMBERS: COUNCH.,M~MBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: June S. Greek, City Clerk 12 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLIrI'ION OF ~ CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOFrING A NONREFUNDABLE PERMIT APPLICATION FEE FOR CHARITABLE, IIELIGIOUS, AND COMM!~CIAL SOLICITATION WITHIN THE CITY OF TI~MYL"ULA WHEREAS, City Ordinance No. 94- provides that the City Council may adopt by resolution a nonrefundable permit application fee for Charitable, Religious and Commercial Solicitation within the City of Temecula; WIn~RAS, a nonrefundable permit application fee for Charitable, Religious and Commercial Solicitation would compensate the City for the cost of processing applications for solicitation permits and for adminisWxing the City's Charitable Solicitation Ordinance; WHEREAS, a noticed public hearing has been held by the City Council at which time all interested persons had the opportunity to appear and be heard on the matter of adopting a permit application fee for Charitable, Religious and Commercial Solicitation within the City of Temecula; NOW, T!:H~EPORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF TITR CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City of Temecula hereby adopts a nonrefundable permit application fee for Charitable, Religious and Commercial Solicitation within the City of Temecula in the mount of Thirty Dollars ($30.00). Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and shall cause the same to be posted as required by law. PASSED, APPROVEr} AND ADOPTED this 1994. day of ATFEST: Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk R:Xt~,o~M I ~'~ ITEM 25 APPRO AL CITY ATTORNEY ~ FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Gary Thornhill, Director of Plannin April 26, 1994 An Ordinance to reduce water consumption through efficient landscape design, consistent with provisions of AB 325. PREPARED BY.' John Meyer, Senior Planner RECOMMENDATION: Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 94- AN ORDINANCE. OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING STANDARDS FOR WATER EFFICIENT LANDSCAPE DESIGN Adopt · Resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING A LIST OF PLANT MATERIALS WATER EFFICIENT LANDSCAPE DESIGN BACKGROUND California Government Code Section 65590 (enacted by AB 325) requires all Cities to adopt a local water efficient ordinance by January 1, 1993 or use the State's model ordinance. Currently, the City's landscape review consultant is using the model ordinance to review plans. In order to develop the most appropriate ordinance for the City, Staff and the landscape review consultant have reviewed the State's Model Ordinance and sample ordinances from many other local jurisdictions and water districts. Based on this review, the consultant provided the City with a draft ordinance which drew components from each of the samples ordinances. Staff then revised this draft to respond to community needs. R:LfFAFFRP~.CCI ~lg/9~ !db 1 The Planning Commission reviewed and recommended approval Of the draft ordinance at its February 7, 1994 meeting. The Commission directed staff to make a few changes to make the Ordinance which will make it a clearer document. The Planning Commission Staff Report has been attached for the Council's review. Since the Commission meeting, staff has contacted the Rancho California Water District. The District has reviewed the Ordinance and made a few recommendations that were incorporated into the Ordinance. The District supports the adoption of the ordinance· FISCAL IMPACT The City Council appropriated $12,000 in FY 93-94to complete the Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. The cost of the ordinance was only $800 for outside consulting services and $3,000 for staff time, resulting in a cost savings of $8,200. This savings was reflected in budget reduction done at mid-year. Attachments: Resolution No. 94- - Page 3 Ordinance No. 94- - Page 6 Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance - Page 9 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 ORDINANCE NO. 94- R:~TAFFRPT~WTRF, FF.CCI 4/18/94 lab 6 - ATTACHMENT NO. 1 ORDINANCE NO. 94- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE ~ ESTABIJ~H1NG STANDARDS FOR EFFICH~NT LANDSCAPE DESIGN CITY OF WATER water use. D. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMF.12ULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Findings. The Temecula City Council hereby makes the following findings: The City Council adopted the General Plan on November 9, 1993. The Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance is consistent with the General Plan. The Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance will encourage the conservation of The Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance will carry out the intent of California Government Cede Section 65590. E. The Planning Commission approved the Plan and recommended that it be adopted by the City Council on February 7, 1994. F. The notice of the proposed Ordinance was posted at City Hall, County Library, Rancho California Branch, the U.S. Post Office and the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce. G. A public hearing was conducted on January 25, 1994, at which time interested persons has an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition. Section 2. Chapter 9.12 is hereby added to the Temecula Design Municipal Cede to read as follows: Section 3. The Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance has been determined to be exempt from the California Environmental quality Act, pursuant to Section 15061 Co)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines. R:~TAFFRPT~WTREFF.CCl 4/18/94 klb 7 Section 4. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. The City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance and a certified copy of the full text of this Ordinance shall be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five days prior to the adoption of this Ordinance. Within 15 days from adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance, together with the names of the Councilmembers voting for and against the Ordinance, and post the same in the office of the City Clerk. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED, 'AND ADOFrED, this day, the _ day of__ 1994. ATTEST: RON ROBERTS MAYOR June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, HEREBY DO CERTIFY that the foregoing Ordinance No. 94- was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the' day of , 1994, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the __ day of ,1994, by the following roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: JUNE S. GREEK CITY CLERK RASTAFFRPT~WTREFF.CCl 4/18/94 klb 8 ATTACHMENT NO. 2 RESOLUTION NO. 94.- R:~rAPPRPT~WTR2~.CCI 4/1~94 klb 3 ATTACHMENT NO. 2 RESOLIYrION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMF_.,CULA ESTABLISHING A LIST OF WATER EFFICIF~NT PLANT. MATERIALS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the City Council of the City of Temecula hereby appwves the attached list of water efficient plant materials pursuant to Section of the Temecula Municipal Cede. Section 2. That the City Council of the City of Temecula further finds that the proposed Water efficient Landscape Ordinance is consistent with the General Plan by encouraging the use of drought tolerant landscaping in new development. Section 3. That the City Council of the City of Temecula further finds that the proposed Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance does not have the potential to cause a significant impacts on the environment and has determined that the pwject is exempt .from California Environmental Quality Act, as amended, pursuant to Section 15061 (b) (3). Section 4. That the City Council of the City of Temecuh hereby recommends to the City Council that the Council adopts the proposed Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. The Ordinance is incorporated into this Resolution by this reference. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, this day, the__ day of 1994. ATTEST: RON ROBERTS MAYOR June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA) R:~'TAFFRFI~WTREFF.CCI 4/18/94 klb 4 I, lune S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, HEREBY DO CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. 94- was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the day of , 1994, and that thereafter, said Resolution was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the day of ,1994, by the following roll call vote: COUNCmMEMBERS: NOES: COUNC~BERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: JUNES'. GREEK CITY CLERK R:k~TAFFRPT~WTREFF.CC1 4118194 ATTACItlV[ENT NO. 3 WATER EFFICIENT LANDSCAPE DESIGN ORDINANCE R:'~STAFFRFF~WTREFF.CCI 4/18/94 klb 9 DRAFT CITY OF TEMECULA Section 17.12.010 Puroose Purpose of this Chapter is as follows: BB To promote high quality, water-efficient landscaping, water use management and water conservation through the use of water-efficient landscaping, wise use of turf areas and appropriate use of irrigation technology and management; To reduce landscape water requirements without a decline in landscape quality or quantity; To retain flexibility and encourage creativity through appropriate design; To assure the attainment of water-efficient landscape goals by requiring that landscape not exceed a maximum water demand of eighty percent (80%) of its reference evapotranspiration (ETo); and To achieve water conservation by raising the public awareness of the need to conserve water through education and motivation to embrace an effective water management program. Section 17.12.030 APPLICABILITY Except as provided in Section 17.12.030 B, requirements of this Chapter shall apply to: All new and rehabilitated development projects including those by public agencies; 2. Developer-installed, common area landscaping multi-family residential development projects· This Chapter shall not apply to: elI · 2. 3. 4. R:%LSCAPL:~e~325.D1 4118194 Idb for single-family and Landscaping for a single family residence; Cemeteries; Registered historical sites; Ecological restoration projects that do not require a permanent irrigation system; Landscape projects that existed prior to the effective date of this Ordinance, unless such landscaping is rehabilitated; 1 Final landscape plans which have been approved prior to the effective date of this Ordinance, unless such landscaping is subsequently rehabilitated; Landscape projects with conditions which, in the determination of the Director of Planning, would reasonably or necessarily be exempt (i.e. users of reclaimed water). Section 17.12.040 GENERAL PROVISIONS All landscape plan approvals are subject to and dependent upon the applicant complying with all applicable City ordinances, codes, regulations, and adopted policies. Should any provision of this Chapter conflict with any other provisions already established by the City of Temecula, the more restrictive shall apply. If the water purveyor for a proposed project has adopted water-efficient landscaping requirements, all landscaping and irrigation plans submitted shall comply with the water purveyor's requirements. Said plans shall be accompanied by a written document from the water purveyor delineating each requirement. Landscape design shall facilitate the implementation of landscape maintenance practices which foster long-term water conservation. Said practices may include, but not be limited to, scheduling irrigation based on established industry standards, conducting water audits and establishing a water budget to limit the amount of water applied per landscaped acre. Section 9.12.050 PROCEDURES The submittal, review, revision and approval of all required landscape and irrigation plans shall be in compliance with already established City of Temecula procedures for land use entitlements. The requirements of this Ordinance shall be submitted jointly along with the required applications, plans and fees required for land use entitlement as required by the Director and on file in the Planning Department. Landscaping plans shall be prepared using the Water Budget Formula described in the Appendix Contract at Section 9.12.090. In addition, landscaping plans shall provide a water budget which includes estimated annual water use (in gallons/acre feet) and the area (in square feet/acres) to' be irrigated; and precipitation rates for each valve circuit. The Planning Director or List designee shall approve all landscaping plans. An applicant shall submit a letter .of substantial conformance, subject to field verification by the Planning Director or List designee, prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Use and Occupancy. Said letter of substantial conformance shall be prepared by the project designer and shall indicate that all plant materials R:~,SCAPt'~325.D1 4118/94 Idb 2 and irrigation system components have been installed in accordance with the approved final landscape and irrigation plans. If · Certificate of Use and Occupancy is not required for the project, such letter of substantial conformance shall be submitted prior to scheduling for the final inspection. Section 17.12.060 LANDSCrAPE DFSIGN REnUIREMENTS The design and installation of all proposed landscape improvements subject to this Section shall comply wit. h the following provisions: The landscaping plan shall incorporate trees, shrubs and ground covers that have low crop coefficiency categories of I and 2 or medium crop coefficiency categories of 3 and 4. The City Council shall approve by Resolution · list of approved plans materials to assist designers in obtaining the plant coefficient of many (but not all) plant materials. If other than those plants which are included in the Resolution is used, the designer shall submit plant coefficient numbers with backup information for use of the City in reviewing the I~lans. Landscape design shall provide for the grouping of plant materials having similar water demands (hydrozones) so as to facilitate appropriate and efficient water applications. Plants selected for non-turf areas shall be well-suited to the climate of the region so as to require minimal water once established. Other, more water consumptive plants should be grouped together and irrigated separately. Absent Planning Director approved Turf is not permitted without to be planted in areas that are less than 10 feet in width. Turf in areas of a lesser width is difficult to water efficiently, frequently resulting in excessive watering. Absent Planning Director approved Turf is not permitted on barmad areas due to the problem. of water run-off. Where turf is used on berms, it should be limited to the "public" side of the berm. The backside of the berm should be planted with less water-consuming shrubs and groundcover. A shallow swale should be designed at the toe of all berms which are adjacent to sidewalks or other impervious surfaces to "catch" any run-off. This will help keep water on planted areas and help prevent weathering of pavement. Irrigation of barmad areas should place the sprinkler heads at the toe of the berm, so as to water "from the bottom up." The use of turf should be limited to only those areas designated for .active recreational use or where irrigated by reclaimed water. Prior to installation of planting, applicants are encouraged to submit soil samples from areas proposed for planting to a soils laboratory for testing for soil fertility. Soil testing provides the designer with information regarding proper soil amendment, as necessary, to provide a healthy landscape environment. Healthier plants tolerate stress conditions better. Testing can also assist in the R:~SCAPt"~325.D1 4/18/94 design of the irrigation system by identifying the nature of the subject soil and thus amending the irrigation system to be as effective as possible. A minimum 2 inch layer of mulching is required to be installed over landscaped areas. The mulching should be in the form of shredded bark, bark chips of varying sizes, or other similar materials. The size and type of mulch used should allow for moisture to pass though the surface, thus .providing permeability and reduced erosion, particularly on slopes. Non-porous material should not be placed under mulch. Landscape design shall provide for the functional aspects of landscaping such as grading, drainage, minimal runoff, erosion prevention, wind barriers, provisions for shade and reduction of glare. Landscape design shall provide for the retention of existing mature landscaping that is in good, healthful condition, incorporating such landscaping into the landscape plan where feasible. The protection, preservation and enhancement of native species and natural areas are encouraged. Section 17.12.070 IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGN 'The design and installation of all irrigation improvements Chapter to this section shall be in compliance with the following provisions: All landscaped areas must be serviced by a automatic irrigation system. It is recommended that irrigation systems be operated by dual or multiple program controllers. Controllers should have at least two independent programs and be capable of initiating a watering cycle three times per day. They should contain default programs, a rain switch, manual and semi-automatic start capabilities, be UL listed, and have · circuit breaker. Controllers used for commercial and industrial developments should have water budgeting and testing capabilities and be contained in a vandal-proof case. These features insure that controllers will be suitable for the type of system they serve and provide proper amounts of water under varying climatic situations. Where possible and where it can be accomplished safely, water systems shall be made capable of utilizing non-potable water, if approved facilities are made available by the water purveyor. Provisions for the conversion to a non-potable water system shall be provided within the landscape plan should there be the possibility for future non-potable water availability. Water systems designed to utilize non-potable water shall be designed to meet all applicable standards of the City of Temecula, the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, State Department of Health Services, the Riverside County Health Department and the local reclaimed water purveyor. Separate valves shall be provided for separate water use planting areas, so that plants with similar water needs are irrigated by the same irrigation valve. Drip irrigation techniques shall be provided where appropriate (i.e., shrubs, massing R:~LSCAPE~AB325.D1 4118/g4 Idb 4 in-mulched areas) in instances where spray irrigation is not necessary. Valves and circuits are recommended to be separated based on water use. 'As an example, trees should be placed on a separate valve from other landscaping. During severe drought conditions, trees could be watered while watering for shrubs, groundcover and lawns could be cutback or eliminated. The irrigation plan shall incorporate appropriate irrigation equipment, drip irrigation, bubbler, spray head, and/or rotor irrigation heads in order to provide the most efficient water application. The irrigation system shall be designed with a minimum of 85% distribution uniformity. The spacing of spray heads within an irrigation system should be designed to provide triangular or .square spacing. Such spacing allows for head-to-head coverage proportionate with their designed specifications. Irrigation systems shall be designed, installed and maintained so as to minimize overspray and runoff onto streets, sidewalks, driveways, structures, windows, walls, and fences; Compliance with this provision will require consideration of the appropriate operating pressure, head/emitter location and spray patterns during the design phase. No overhead spray systems shall be used in landscape areas narrower than 4 feet in width or in road mediums less than 10 feet in width. The use of low head check valves shall be included in irrigation systems as applicable. Such valves prevent water from flowing out of sprinkler heads which are located at the low points of irrigation systems when the systems are not operating. Pressure regulation shall to be incorporated into all irrigation systems to prevent excessive pressure at sprinkler heads. Sprinkler heads should not operate at pressures that exceed their design capacity. Excess pressures can result in misting or fogging which wastes water. Also, excess pressures can damage heads causing excessive water usage. Pressure regulation can be accomplished through the use of a pressure regulator, or pressure regulating valves or heads. After establishment of the plant materials, the irrigation of landscaped areas should be limited to the hours between dusk and early morning in order to provide maximum benefit to the plant material and to reduce. unnecessary water loss through wind drift and evaporation, Drip irrigation systems are exempt from.this provision, A watering schedule which incorporates the specific water needs of the plants and turf throughout the calendar year, including water needs both before and after the plants and turf have been established, shall be included with the irrigation plans. The watering schedule shall take into account the particular characteristics of the soil; shall be continuously available on site to those responsible for the landscape maintenance; and shall contain specifics as to R:'~,SCAI:t'%~325.D14/16/64 kJb 5 optimum run time and frequency of watering, and irrigation hours per day. Section 17,12.080 RESIDENTIAL MODEL HOME REQUIREMENTS Thirty percent of all model homes in residential subdivisions, or at least one, whichever is more, shall comply with the provisions of this Chapter. The project applicant shall provide home buyers with sample water-efficient landscape and irrigation plans and additional educational material as approved by the Director of Planning, upon the sale of each dwelling unit within the project. The plans shall include a key identifying the common names of the plants used in the landscaping. Ce The project applicant shall distribute outdoor water conservation pamphlets provided by local water purveyors, if available, to buyers upon the sale of each dwelling unit within the development. A sign shall be displayed in the front yard of each model home which is clearly visible to home buyers. The sign shall indicate that the model home complies with a water-efficient landscape and irrigation design provissions of the local ordinance. R:~LSCAPE~AB325,D1 4/18194 Idb 6 Section 17.12.020 DEFINITIONS A. "Allowable, Percentage": Means allowable percentage for determining the maximum allowable water budget is 0.8. This represents a factor including consideration of an average landscape coefficient and irrigation efficiency. See page 10 for a more complete discussion. B. "Amendment" means additions to the soil, such as compost, leaf mold, peat moss, ground bark, which improve aeration and drainage of clay soils and help hold water in sandy soils. anti-drain valve: A valve located under a sprinkler head to hold water in the system so it does not drain out of the lower elevation sprinkler heads. application rate: The depth of water applied to a given area in one h'our, usually measured in inches per hour. automatic controller: A mechanical or solid state timer, capable of operating valve stations to set the days and length of time of a water application. backflow prevention device: A safety device used to prevent pollution or contamination of the water supply due to the reverse flow of water from the irrigation system. distribution uniformity: A measure of how evenly water is applied over an area. emitter: Fittings that deliver water slowly through small openings from the lateral line to the plant. established landscape: The point at which plants in the landscape have established themselves into the adjacent soil. establishment period: For purposes of this ordinance, the first year after installing the plant in the landscape. The actual establishment period varies depending upon the plant species, the development of the plant's root system, soil conditions, and other environmental factors. estimated water use: The amount of water the designer estimates that the project will need on an annual basis. The estimated water use cannot exceed the maximum allowable water budget. evapotranspiration: The quantity of water evaporated from adjacent soil surfaces, transpired by plants, and retained in plant tissue during a specific time. R:~LSCAPE~B325.D1 4118194 klb 7 flow rate: The rate at which water flows through pipe fittings and valves. hydrozone: A Portion of the landscape area having plants with' similar water needs that are served by a valve or set of valves with the same setting. A hydrozone may · be non-irrigated, for example, a naturalized area. irrigation efficiency: The measurement of the amount of water beneficially used divided by the amount of water applied. landscape coefficient: The functional equivalent of a crop coefficient in agriculture. When multiplied times ETo, it estimates the amount of water required to maintain landscape plants in good condition. landscape irrigation audit: A process to perform site inspections, evaluate irrigation systems, and develop efficient irrigation schedules. landscaped area: The entire parcel less the building 'pad, driveways, non-irrigated portions of parking lots, hardscapes- such a decks and patios, and other non-porous. areas. land use entitlement: Any legislative, discretionary or quasi-judicial review that requires city approval. lateral line: The water delivery pipeline that supplies water to the emitters or sprinklers from the main line. main line: The pipeline that delivers water from the water source to the lateral lines. mature landscape: See "established landscape" maximum allowable water budget: For design purposes, the upper limit of annual water use for the established landscaped area. It is based upon the area's average year climate and the size of the landscaped area. moisture sensing device: A device that measures the moisture conditions of the soil in a variety of ways. mulch: Any material such as leaves, bark, or straw left loose and applied to the soils surface to prevent evaporation. operating pressure: The pressure at which a system of sprinklers operates. (Static pressure minus pressure losses.) This is usually indicated at the base or nozzle of a sprinkler. overspray: When sprinklers deliver water beyond the landscaped area, wetting pavements, walks, structures, or other non-landscaped areas.' R:t.L-SCAPt'~B325.131 4118194 kJb 8 percolation: The movement of water through the soil. potable water: Water which is meant for human consumption. precipitation rate: The rate at which water is applied, usually expressed in inches per hour. pressure compensation bubbler: A sprinkler head useful for watering trees and shrubs with water basins: produces a reduced flow of water that bubbles on the soil. quick coupling system: A sprinkler system which uses permanently installed valves and sprinklers that can be moved from valve to valve. rain switch or rain shut off valve: Measures rainfall and automatically shuts off the irrigation system when water reaches a certain level. reclaimed water: Treated or recycled water of a quality suitable for nonpotable uses such as landscape irrigations; not intended for drinking. reference evapotranspiration (ETo): A standard measurement of evapotranspiration for a large field of 4- to 7- inch tall, cool season grass that is well watered. rehabilitated landscape: Rehabilitated Landscaping is a significant replacement of established landscaping and/or irrigation with a new landscaping and irrigation. For purposes or this ordinances, significant is defined as any replacement exceeding 50% of a landscaped area and at the discretion of the Director of Planning.. run off: Water which is not absorbed by the soil or landscape to which it is applied. Run off occurs when water is applied at toi~ great a rate or when there is a severe slope. soil texture: The classification of soil based on the percentage of sand, silt, and clay in the soil. sprinkler head: A device which discharges water through a nozzle. static water pressure: The pipeline or municipal water supply pressure when water is not flowing. station: An area served by one valve or set of valves that operate simultaneously. turf: A surface layer of earth containing grass with its roots. valve: A device used to control the flow of water in the irrigation system. R:~SCAFt"~B~B325.D1 4/18/64 kJb .9 valve: A device used to control the flow of water in the irrigation system. SOURCES This document is a compilation and modification of several water efficient landscape ordinances from other agencies. Information from the following sources is used: Riverside County: Water Efficient Landscaoe Ordinance Reauirements Eastern Municipal Water District: Procedural Guide and General Desian Reauirements for Procurina Water Service for On-Site Landscaoe Irrigation Systems City of Dana Point: Ordinance No. 92-13 R:'~LSCAPE~AB32S.D1 411ele4. k, lb 10 WATER BUDGET FORMULA Section 9.12.090 PROJECTED LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION WATER USE PROCESS Aooendix Process Step Number Formula Step # I The evapotranspiration for Temecula is 55.4"/year. Step # 2 Identify the boundaries of planting areas with similar water requirements (hydrozones) and measure their area. (sq.ft.) Step # 3 Obtain the plant coefficient (KC) for each hydrozone from Exhibit "B". Step # 4 Obtain the irrigation system distribution efficiency percentage from Table No. 1. Step # 5 Obtain irrigation system operation efficiency percentage from Table No. 2. Step # 6 Calculate the yearly plant water demand, in inches (Step #1 X Step #3), result in./year. Step # 7 Calculate yearly plant water demand by volume (0.083 X Step #2 X Step #6), result in cu.ft./year. Step # 8 Calculate irrigation efficiency (Step #4 / Step #5), unitless. Step # 9 Calculate hydrozone water demand (Step #7 / Step #8), result in cu.ft.lyear. Step # 10 Calculate the allowable project water demand (*0.083 X * *0.8 X Step #1 X Total sq.ft.), results in cu.ft./year. Step # 11 Compare the allowable project water demand from Step # 10, to the total of all hydrozone water demands. If the total projected water demand is higher than 80% of total allowable project water demand, then either select plants with less water demand or utilize more efficient irrigation equipment, or both. 0.083 is e conversion factor to convert inches to feet (1 / 12 = 0.083) 0.8 is e multiplier to obtain 80% of the evapotranspiration value. PROJECTED LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION WATER USE R:~SCAIt'~kB325.D14/18/84. klb Exhibit A - I EXHIBIT Hydrozone Number Evapotranspiration Rate (in./yr.) -- 55.0" Area of Hydrozone (scl.ft.) Plant Coefficient (KC) (Exhibit "B") Irrigation system Distribution Efficiency (Table No. 1 ) Proposed Irrigation Operation Efficiency (Table No. 2) Yearly Plant Water Demand (Step #1 X Step #3) result in (in./yr.) Total Area Water Demand (0.083 X item #6 X item #2) result in (cu.ft.) Irrigation Efficiency (step #4 X step #5) Hydrozone Water Demand (cu.ft.) (item #7 / item #8) result in (cu.ft.) cu.ft. per yr. cu.ft. per yr. Process I 2 3 4 Step # (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) Allowable Project Demand (10) (0.083 X 0.8 X step #1 X the total of all step #2's) Total of all areas water demands. R:~I.SCAI~'U~3325.D1 4118/94 klb Exhibit A - 2 PROJECTED LANDSCAPE. IRRIGATION WATER USE EXHIBIT TABLE NO. 1 TYPICAL IRRIGATION IRRIGATION · · · SYSTEM DISTRIBUTION EFFICIENCY FOR VARIOUS TYPES .OF Insert 0.7 ~ Step #4 in case of using spray heads Insert 0.85 @ Step #4 in case of using bubbler heads Insert 0.85 @ Step #4 in case of using rotor irrigation heads Insert 0.9 @ Step #4 in case of using drip irrigation system TABLE NO. 2 IRRIGATION SYSTEM OPERATION EFFICIENCY Insert 0.85 @ Step #5 if the system has Eto controls, such as moisture sensor, central controller. · TABLE NO. 3 CROP COEFFICIENT (KC} VALUES LOW WATER USE MEDIUM WATER USE HIGH WATER USE Insert 0.65 ~ Step #5 if the system does not have soil or weather driven controls. CATEGORY 1: KC -- 0 TO 0.25 CATEGORY 3: KC = 0.40 TO 0.60 CATEGORY 4: KC -- 0.60 TO 0.80 CATEGORY 5: KC = 0.80 OR GREATER ~U. SC, eJ~',4a2S.D~ 4~8/e4 ~ Exhibit A - 3 Source: PLANT LIST EXHIBIT "B" Riverside County Plant List ItlLSCAFt'~325.D1 4118/94 Idb 0, Commas Nanso Acacia bafieyana Purple Bailey Acacia Acacia b. 'Purl, urea' rurple-Ixaf Acacia Acacia decurrens · Green Wattle Amcia d. dealbata Acacia melanoxylon Black Acacia Aesculus callfornica C. alff0rnja Buckeye Peppermint Tree Albizia juh'brissin Silk Tree Arbutus unedo Strawberry Tree Brachychiton accrifolius Australian Flame Tree Brachychiton populncus Bottle Tree Callisiemon rigidus S~[f ttottlebru~h Weeping Bottlcbrush Calocedrus decurrens Castretina c,,~-;n,~hamiana ~a equisetifolia Horsetail Tree Fit Ca. KC 2o/Wst giv. Co. Guide . Category Native Native 4, 5, 6 2 5, 6 2 5, 6 2 5,6 2 4, 5, 6 5, 6 AU 5, 6 5, 6 4,5,6 4,5,6 5,6 1,2, ~ 3.5,6 4.5.6 4.5,6 2 2-3 2 2-3 2 2-3 2-3 3 X X X it~marks (TF~::~-~ 21 ft. Plus) lotsnatal& Come Nmmos Ctdr~ atlantiea AtlasC, edar Cedrus deodara Deodar~ Cenlonia s~iqua Carob Cm:idium fiorldum Blue Palo Verde C~maerop~ humills Mediterranean Fan Palm Floss S~k Tree Smoke Tree C~pressocypsris leylandii Elaeagnus angustifolja Russian Olive Eriobotrya defiexa Bron,~ Loquat Eriobotrya japonica Loqust Er~ea ms9 Mctican Blue palm Erythea eduli~ Cruadahl>c Palm Eucalyptus camaldulensis River Red Gum Enca!~tus globulus "Compacta" Dwarf Blue Gum l~uc~!yptus lei~nannii Bushy Yate 1,2, 3, 5, 6 4,5,6 3, 4, 5, 6 3,4, 5,6 All 2, 3, 4,5,6 t 4t t 4, t 6 4, S, 6 w 4t t 40 2 KC · 2-3 2-3 2 1-2 2 2-3 1 2-3 2 2-3 · ~-3 2 2 f~vst Native X X Native X Remarks Hardy to 12 - 15 degrees E Hardy to 17 - 22 degrees F. Hardy to i4 - 18 degrees F. ·, ~ 21 ft. Plus) I, etamkst & Common Name White Ironbark Eucalyptus macrocarps Big Fmited Eucalyptus Eucalyptus njchotii Nicbol's Wilkvw-Leafed Peppermint Eucalyptus niphophila Snow Gum Eucalyptus polyanthemos SOrer Dollar Gum Eucalyptus pulverulenta S0ver Mountain Gum Eucalyptus rudis Desert or Swamp Gum Eucalyptus s~deroxylon Pink Ironbark Eucalyptus sideroxylon "Rosea' Red Ironbark F_.m=lyptus viminalis Australian Willow Ginko biloba ~,!aidenhair Tree Ely. Co. Guide 4, 5, 6 KC 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2-3 2-3 So/Wst Nadve X Nadve X Remarks Hardy to 14 - 18 degrees F. Hardy to 8 - 12 degrees F. Har~' to 12 - 15 degrees F. Hardy to 0 - 10 degrees F. Hardy to 14 - 18 degrees F. Hardy to 15 - 21 degrees F. Hardy to 12-18 degrees F. Hardy Io 10 '- 15 degrees F. Hardy to 10 - 15 degrees F. Hardy to 12-15 degrees F. Deciduous (TREES 21 ft. Plus) Botaakal & Common Names Gteditsia triscsnthos Honey Locust GreWlies robusU Silk Oak Jugbus ctliJ'omicz California Walnut Koelreuteria bipinnata Chinese Flame Tree K~elreuteria paniculata Goldenrain Tree Lagerstreemia indic~ Crape Myrtle Laurus nobHis S~eet Bay Leptospermum iaevigatum Australian Tea Tree Leptospermum scoparium New Zealand Tea Tree Lyonothamnus ~on'bundus asplen. Fernleaf Catalina Ironwood Maytenus boarls Mayten Tree Melaleuca linariifolia Fittleaf Paperbark Mehleuca quinquenervia Cajeput Tree Melaleuca slyphelioides Olea europaea Otive Olea "Fruitless" Fruitless Olive Obeys tesota Desert bonwc, c<l liv. Co. Guide 4, 5, 6 2,5,6 3, 4, 5,6 4,5,6 516 4, 5, 6 4 4,5,6 5,6 5,6 4 KC 2-3 2 2 2-3 2-3 3 3 3 2-3 2-3 2 So/wst Native X X X Native Remarks Deciduous May Freeze Plus) Parkinsonia smleata 3, 4 Mezkzn Palo Verde 5, 6 Phoenix dactytifera Dale Farm 4, 5, 6 Knolx:one Pine C. au~ island Pine Pinus eoultetl Coulter Pine Pinus edulis Two Leaf Pinyon Pinus eldarica KC So/wst Category Nstiv~ 2 X Pinus halepensis A!eppo Pine Pinus pinea Italian Stone Pine Pinus torreyana Torrey Pine l'tslacis chinensi C~,,ese Pistache 2 PislK-ia veTa Pistacio Nut Pitmsporum rhombifolium 0ueensland Pitmsporum Platanus acerifolia London Plane Tree umum Cslifornis Sycsmore Popalas f. remontii Prosopis ch~cnsis Chilc~ Mesquite 2,5,6 2 X 2-3 All 2 X X 4, 5, 6 3,5,6 4, 5, 6 1-2 X 2 2-3 2 X '2 2 2-3 2-3 2 X Rjv. Co, Nstjve X 2-3 X X 2 Remarks # 5 ('FR~:r-~ 21 ft. Pin) Names Prunus csroliniana CaroKoa Laurel Cherry Prunus iyonii Catalina Cherry Pseudotsup macrocarpa B/g Case Spruce Quffcus agrifofia CoastLjveOak Ouercus chrysoleps Canyon Live Oak Blue Oak Quercus cngdmannfi Mm Oak Onerous Ua Holly Oak (~ercus kelioZ~i Cali~orni: Bla~k Oak Quacus iobat~ VaBcy Oak (~ercus subcr Cork Oak Quercus wislizenii Interior Live Oak Kbsmnus sisremus Itslian Buckthorn ~ Sumac Roblnia pseudor.~ia Black Locust Sambucus mc~cana ]~,akan F~lderberr~ ,~inus moBe C.~!ifornia Pepper Tree 5 4, 5,6 4,5,6 1, 2, 3,5,6 5,6 4,5,6 5, 6 3, 4, 5,6 1,2, 5,6 3,4,. 5,6 5,6 3,4, 5, 6 4,5,6 4,5,6 KC Catqor~ 2 3 1-2 1-2 1-2 2-3 2 2 2 1-2 1-2 ~so/Wst Na~vt X X X X X .X X X X X X X X X X X X 'Remarks ~/~:-~: 21 fi- Plus) ktaakal & C~. -~ Nam~ Schinus terebinthifolius' Brszillu Pepper sequoia sempavirens ( tiv,rs) Coast Redwood Sequohdendron giganteum G/sat Sequoia Umbelluhrh czlifornica Cali~oml, Bay Wuhingtonh California Fan Palm Washingtonia robusta Mctican Fan Palm ~a sin-rata Sawleaf 7,elkova Zizyphus jujuba Chinese Jujube ~jv. Co. 50 46 4, 5.6 3, 4, 5, 6 3, .4, 2,3, 4, 5, 6 3,4, 5, 6 2 3 2-3 2-3 2 Native X X llv. Native itemarks 7 (LARGE SI.mUBS ~! - 20 fi) LARGE SH]tUBS 11 * 30 ft, Bornaim! & Co u Nam~ Arabia farnulana Seeet A=acia Ad:acia gref, gii Catclaw A~acia Ancia Iougifolia Sydney Colden Wattle Ancia podalyriifolia Pearl ~a ;u:a~a verticflta~m Adenostoma spsrsifolium Red Shank Arctostaphylos glandulosa Rjv, Co, KC Sn/Wst llv. C~ GaMe Category Nativ, Native 4,5,6 2 4,5,6 2 4, 5, 6 2 3, 4, 5.6 2 5, 6 2 4,5,6 2 5,6 2 2,3, 5,6 1 X X X X 2,5,6 1 X X Arctostapbyios glauca Bigberry Manzanka 2, 5, 6 ,1 Bazhar~ pllularis con.~nguinea ~te Brush S, 6 2 !bn:haris v~,,,i,,ea 3, 4, Mule Fat 5, 6 2 4, 6 2-3 Cac. ulpiaia gelcsfi 3, 4, Bird of Paradise Bush 5, 6 1-2 Ceam~ puicberrima Dwarf Pobsciau C,~fi,~tcnx>n citrinus ~on ~t~sh 4,5,6 4,5,6 X X X 2 2-3 X X N~marks Will Freeze Troublexl with C~]orosis in Zone Csanothns "Ray Hanmu" Csanothus *Skrrs Blue" Cazidium floridurn Blue Palo Verde Ccrcls occldentalis Western Re~ud C~-~.~m.pus betuloides Mountain Mthogany ~us ledifolius Cud-Leaf Mountain Mahogany Chainscrop humills Mediterranean Fan Palm (::]~sis linearis Dean Willow Smoke Tree Dodonara vismsa Hops~,.d Bush Elaeagnus tugunifolia Russian Olive Elaeagnu pungens Silverberry lainapple Cmava Fr~:~nus tiipetala Foothill Ash 4,5,6 3,4, 3, 4, 5, 6 , 40 0 41 4,5,6 t 4s 3. 4. 5, 6 4,5, 6 , 4 KC 2 2-3 2-3 2-3 1-2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2-3 9 k/Wst X X X X X X X giv. ~ Native X X X X X Ramarks Hardy 'to 8-12 degrees F. (L~RGE SHRUBS 11 - 20 h) FrEmontodez:~,;,: mlifomka Common FlnEnEl ~ush Fremootodendron meficanum Sourban Flannel Bush Gsrrys flarestens Pale Tasselbush Heteromeles arbutifolia Toyon Jugtzns califomica California Walnut Juniperus species Melaleuca cHiptics Nerium oleander Oleander Olneya tuot~ Desert Ironwood Photinia fraseri Pbotinla serrulata {2tlnese Pbotinia Pinus edulis Tm~ Leaf Pinyon Prosopis glsndulosa torreyana Mesquite Prunus carollniana Carolina Laurel Cherry Prunus i]i~olla ~':oI~ Leaf Cberry Prunus lyonii Catalina Cberry ~m030 4, S, 6 931 4, S, 6 2,5,6 3,4, 5,6 2.5,6 4,5,6 3,4, 5,6 t 6 3,4, S, 6 3, 4, 5,6 9 4t 1 41 4,5,6 4,5,6 10 KC 1-2 2 1-2 2 2-3 3 2 2 3 3 1-2 2 2 X X X X X X X X X X X Native X X X X X X ~marks No Summer Water No Summer Water No Summer Water Red Bcrriu in Winter. Nice Small Tree. Will Ftr~ (lARGE ~-Igtm$ X~ - ~0 f~) I~aalml & C~ ;m His Firethom Ouercus dumosa California Scrub Oak Interior Live Oak ltalim3 Buclnborn Rhtmnus ilicifolia HolJy-Leaf Redberry Rhus intcgrifolia Lemonstie Berry Rhus ltncea African Sumac Rhus !aurina Laurel Sumac Rhus ovals Sugar Bush Suznbucus mezicana Metinn Elderberry Califofzda Pepper Tree Temma starts Yellow Bells Tecomada ca,portals Csnpe HoneysuckJe Umbellulada mlifornica C,.!ifornja Bay Vauquelinla californica ,:'~izona Rosewood Iv. Co. KC k/Wst Iv. Co. Cuid, ("*~lc-.f Nadve Native 4,6 4 S, 6 2 5,6 '2 5, 6 1 5,6 2 3, 4, ~,6 2 3, 4, ~, 6 1-2 5, 6 2-3 4,5,6 2 5, 6 1-2 5, 6 1-2 All i-9- 4, 5, 6 1-2 4, 5, 6 2-3 4, 5, 6 2 4, 5, 6 2-3 3,4 2 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Ixmarks Prefers Milder Climate, · Us~ Spafing.ly May Freez~ (LARGE mRU~S ~l - 2~ fi) Bot~l & Cammoa Nam~ IC ~Vst Native (M3~fUM Si~,UBS 4 - I0 ~) MEDIUM Ei/itU~ 4 - 10 tt. ~=,~b--1 & C. xxnmon Names Riv. Co. KC So/Wst Riv. Co. Guide Category Native Native Remarks Arctonaphylos 'Louis Edmuncts" Arctonaphyios 'Sentinel" Artunisia callfornlca Anemisla tridentata Atrip|~z csnuc.~ns Four Wing Saltbush Atriplez kntiformis Quil Bush Atripi,'- ientiforn~is breweft Brewer Saltbush Cal~ndra californica Call(-ndra eriophylla Fai~ Duster C4anothus 'Concha" 7-3 S, 6 2 X 5,6 2 X 5.6 2 X 5, 6 2 X X I X X All 2 X X 5, 6 2 X X t 6 3, 4, 5,6 3, 4, 5, 6 2 2 1 7-3 X X X X X X Cutoothus crusifolius Hoary-Leaf Cunothus Cm~thus cune. stus Cmnmon Buckbrush Curiothus greggii C=pluf Cuoothus C.~oothus integerriznus D~rbr~sh C~=anothus *Joyce Coulter' 2,5,6 4,5,6 4,5,6 5 6 2 '1 2 7.3 X X X X (MEDIUM SHRUBS 4'- 10 ft.) Boreal ,s, Cc~,~: Nines Curiothus *Julia Foe~ps' Ceanothus 'q~ytark" Cesnothus *Snawaurrf 2,5,6 2.5.6 4.5.6 4.5,6 4,5,6 3, 4, 5, 6 5,6 KC Category 2-3 2 2-3 3 2-3 2 3 3 So/wn Native. X X i~.Co. Native Remarks Daiea greggii Dalu pukhra Dslea s~inosa Smoke Tree Dendrom--,~on rigida Bush Poppy Diphcus iongifiorus Bush Monkey Flower Echium fasxuorum (i~tennial) Pride of Madeira J 6 4 All 2,5,6 5, 6 5,6 2-3 2-3 1-2 1-2 2 2 X X X X X Frost Tcnd:r 14 (MEDKTM SHRUBS 4 - 1o fz.) Fky-,,b-~ & C, tsmmon Names F--aSh pmd,:n Apache ~ume tslsnd Bush-Snap Dragon Isomeris arborea Bladder Pod Juz~rus sf~cies Juniper Lsrrca tridcntata Creosote Bush Leucoplytlum 'Green Cloud" Leucopby!Jum 'White Le~copbytlum frutescens Texas Ranger Le. ucophyllum zygophyllum Lupinus albif. rons S.~va Lupine Lapbus trboreus 'Mahozda aquifo~um marerams Mahonia sevinfi Nnrin Ms.honia Heavenly. Bamboo Nerlum oleander "Little Red" 4, S, 6 4, S, 6 3, 4, 6 3, 4, ~, 6 3.4 S, 6 3,4, 5, 6 2,5,6 3. 4, 5, 6 3,4, 5, 6 w 40 KC Catego~ 2-3 2 1-2 2-3 1 2 2 2 -2 2 2 3 2 3 2-3 So/wst Native X X .X X X X X Riv. Co. Native X X X Rcmarks Od tmYm S LmS - XO Botanical & Couuzmn Names N,rimn ele-,,der *Little White' !~tstemon antirrhinoidas To~ira Plumbago aurieulata Cape Plumbago !'yrscanths species F'sr~thorn Rh,m-us california Rhamnus californica *Eve Case' Rhxmnusiljcifolia Holly-Leaf Redberry Rhmm-us croc~a Redberry Rhus integrifotia Lemonade Berry Rhus hurina' (Malosma) Laurel Sumac Ribes sureurn Ribes m.nguiaium glutinosum Pink Flowering Currant Fnchsin-~ering Gooseberry IdatFtija Poppy Rmema~ Salvia "Allen O~ckering' Riv. Co. KC So~Wm Riv. Co. Guide Category Native Native 2-3 $, 6 1 X 2-3 4.5.6 2 3, 4 5, 6 2 $, 6 2 3, 4, 5,6 2 5, 6 1-2 X X X X X 5,6 I X X 5, 6 2-3 X 5, 6 1-2 X AH 2-3 X 5, 6 2-3 X $, 6 2 X X 3, 4, 5,6 2 16 .2 X X Remarks Prefers M,'lder Climale, Use Sparingly May Freeze (m~WM smvss 4 - so n.) Common Naunm Teucrium fruticans B-d, C_~ennander Theverb penndana Yellow Oleander Trichost~ma lariaturn Wooly Blue Curls Westringla rosmariniformis Woodwa~dia ftmbriata Giant ~ Fern Xyiosma rangesturn Xyksma n:mgesmm "~,ompaaa' Yu=a t, ioriosa Ym glodon 'Variepta" Yucca pendub glauca giv. co. XC so/wn R~v. Co. Ggids Category Native Nat/v, I X 3, 4, 5, 6 2 X 3. 4. S, 6 2 X 2,5,6 I X 3,4, 6 1-2 X 3, 4, 5,6 2 4, 5, 6 3, 4, 5,6 4 5,6 I X 6 4 2-3 2-3 4, $, 6 2'3 2'3 4,$,6 '3 17 X X X X X Rennzks (MEDIUM SitRUBS 4 - 10 ~) Ik-d=,,~'-~ & ~n Names Mobave Yun:a KC Category ~/wst Native X giv. Co. Native X Remar~ (SMALL ~4RUBS 1 * 3 ft.) Names Agapanthus africanus LDy of the Nile Appanthus africanus Agapanthus 'peter Pan' Agave americana 'Variegata' C.~ntury Plant Agave deserti D~n Apve Aloe vera Medicinal Aloe A!yogyne huege~ii Blue l-Libiscus Arbutus unedo °Compacta" Amtonaphyios "Carreel Sat' Ar~,~ # q:,byios 'Danville · Araostaphylos "F. mertld Carpet' /Id. aOStaphyloS "Litde Sur" Arctmuph~s 'Montaey Carpet" Ammtaphylos 'Pacilic Mist' Araostsphyios 'Point Reyes' SMILLSHRUBSI-3ft, Riv. Co. KC So/Wst giv. Co. Guide Category Native. Native 4, 5, 6 2 All 3 X X 4,5,6 2-3 4, 5,6 2-3 4, 5, 6 2'3 4,5,6 1 2,3, 4,5,6 1 4,5,6 1'2 3,4, 5, 6 2'3 3, 4, 5,6 2 X 5,6 2 X 5,6 2 X 5,6 2 5, 6 2 X 5, 6 -2 X 2 2 19 1,2 5,6 X Remarks X g (SMALL Si4~UBS 1 - 3 f%-) Common Ntmm Arctostapbyl~ "WinterStow" Argemone species l~'ick~ Poppy Armerla marllima Sea Pink Artemish mlifomics California Sagebrush ArtEmisln 'Canyon Grey" Artemish cau~ Silver Spreader Artcmish pl~socephals Sandbill Sage Atripla r, lsuca AXtipI~ seffu'baccata Anstrslian Saltbush lbccharis pi]ularis 'l'win ~ ~o2 Brush BK:chax~ piluhris "Pigeon Point' Ikkperone mllfomica Clmparosa Callisndra tweedii Trinidad Flame Bush 1,2 5,6 , 6 3, 4, 5,6 t 4 3,4, 5, 6 4,5,6 5 4 3,4,6 3,4,6 , 4 4,5,6 20 KC CateZoty 2 3 2' 3 2 2 2 3 -1 2 2 '1 2-3 X X X X X X !~v. Co. Native X X Remuks Freezes back, but recovers in zone 13 (SMA~ SItRUBS 1 * 3 ft.) Canman Names Carlssa Zrandifiora 'Tunic" Natal Plum Carpenteria mlifomica Bush Anemone Cassia artemisioides Festbery Cassia Cassia candoleana Cassia nemophDa Cs~a odorata Cassia wisl~v," Ceanothus grisius Carreel Ceanotbus C, eanothus grisiu s bofizo ntafis Carreel Creeper C, eanoth us Ccsnothus 'Yankee Point" Cmtauru cineraria Contrsnthus ruber Red Valerion ~mmmmsmmusmm Cistus crisp~s fnmummmm Cistus mrbsriensis 'White Rockrose Ci~tus salvi~olius Sageleaf Rockrose Riv. Co. 4,5.6 S, 6 4, 5, 6 4,5,6 4,5,6 , 6 3, 4, S, 6 4, 5, 6 4. 5, 6 4, 5, 6 21 3 3 2-3 2-3 2-3 2-3 2-3 2 2-3 2-3 .2-3 2-3 2-3 2-3 2 '2 So/Wst Native X X Riv. Co. Native (smAt~samVBs I -3 n-) Botnical & Comn~n Names Bur. h Mor-h,_~ Glory Coavolvuhs mauritanicus Mot-h,=- Gk:,ry Coreopsls hnceolau Coreopsis Loetcnnsal) Colot2easte~ buzU'otius Cotoneastct congeslus DaJu greg~i D~n wheeleri Dc~rt Spoon Diplacus puniceus Red Mookey Fbwer Dz~pteris erythrosora Aulumn F~rn Dcscn Brittlebush ~um arborescens Santa Cruz Island Buckwbu~ Eriogonum f, uciculatum Cal~ornia Buckwhut Ea'iogouum f-a'4r. tl,tum 'Wild~x~f' Efiorzum ~iputcum SL Catherine's Lace F. rlopbyilum m~ertiflorum Cmlden Yarrow Fdlcla tmdioides · Blue Marguerite Riv. Co. Guide 4,5, 6 4, S, 6 3, 4 5,6 , 6 KC 2 3 2 3 2-3 2-3 So/wn Na~e Riv. Co. Native 5,6 2 X 2, S, 6 1-2 X X All 3 5,6 .1 X X 2-3 X I X X 1-2 24 2-3' 4,5,6 34 X X X RemarB 22 (SMALL SHRUBS Common Names Hummin b d Bush Helisntbemum nummularium Sun Rose Hcmerocallb sp. hybrids Hcucbcra maxima Island Alumroot Heuchera stuguinea Ctral Bells Pscific Cmn Iris Ira hayesiana Hayes lva Juniperus species Jnniper Keckiclla oordifofia Heart Leaf Pcntstemon !iss'.mbo~a uvaria (Perennial) Red Hot Poker lavedub aaZuslifolia :F, ar, Jish lavender ZjVID,4,,I= Ck$$tata F~nch lAvenckr LepIodactylon c$1ifornicum 3,4, 5,6 2,5,6 1, 2 5, 6 4, S, 6 4, ~, 6 5, 6 4' KC Category 3 2-3 3 3 2 2 2-3 1-2 2 2 '2 23 X X X X X X Riv. Co. Native X Needs Shade Needs Shade D~er & Rabbit Repellant C, ood ~li sods, Erosion control May Freeze but ra:ovef (SMALL SHRUBS - 3 Lkum pererase Perennial B!uc Flax Liriope muscsri (perennial) Big Blue L~y Turf Ionicera subspicats C3up~rral Honeysuckle Lores bertbelotti Cpetennial) Psrrot's Lotus. scoptrius Msbonia zqui. compact~ Mshonis repens Creeping Mzbonia Morae., ~Bicolor° Buncrf]y Iris M~.u irrioidcs (Dietes) FormiXht Lily M)~xrum pszvffolium Nedurn oleander "Petite Pink" .mmm Nerium oleander "Petite Sslmon' Pzrry's Nolina Oemothers missoure~ Q~rennial) Riv. Co. Guide 4,5,6 All 4,5,6 4,5,6 3,4. S, 6 3, 4, 4,5,6 KC Category 2 2 3 3 2-3 2-3 .2-3 3 2-3 2-3 2-3 'l 2-3 Nstive X X X giv. Ca. Native X Remarks Averages 2 ft. tal] 24 SHRUBS 1 - 3 ft.) Botanical & Canmon Names Evening 1~ ~,, qmmmumsmm~ Freeway Daisy (~ Oueen) Pnnisetum s~ta~cum Fountain pcntsteznon *Cherry Giov? Pentstcmon gloziniodes Garden Pentstemon PearSlemon heterophyllus Pentsimon spectabilis Showy Pentstemon Pittosporum robira "Wbeelen' Wbeeler's Dwarf Pyrscsntba species Firethorn Raphiolepis indica 'Clara" Indian Hawthorn 'Clara" Rapbioicpis indica "Pink Lady" Indian Hawthorn "Pink L~dy" mdi Raphiolepis ' 'ca Ribes indecorum · ~'nite Flowered Currant ]b'bes Fur. bsia-F!o~ering Gooseberry Ev~rp'e~a Currant imamrams Rosm~rinus o~ "Prostratus" Dwarf 'Rosemary P~v. Co. Guide 3, 4, ~, 6 3. 4, 5, 6 5, 6 S, 6 5, 6 5, 6 5, 6 3, 4, 5, 6 25 Category 2-3 2-3 1-2 1-2 1-2 2 2 -3 So/wst Native X X X X X Riv. Co. Native X X X Remarks Several to choose from N. equirCs some shade_ giv. Co. KC . So/Wsl giv. Co. Guide Category Native Native t 40 3, 4, 5, 6 3, 4, 5, 6 2,5,6 2, 5, 6 All All All 3,4, 5,6 2 1-2 Society Carlie Trlchoslema lanztum W~ Blue ~r~ Xyionna ~onge~tum 'Compacta' Yua:a mdsipplei Our LortFs Candle Zauchner:,a nlifomica ' California Fuchsia 4,5,6 2 2-3 2 2 4, 5, 6 2-3 X X X X X X 5,6 I X 6 3, 4, 5, 6 2-3 4, 5, 6 '1 2,4, 5, 6 1-2 X X X X X X Remarks i~*";,'*~ & Ctsnmon Names Riv. Co. KC Guide Category CmCla~ 5,6 Native 4, 6 2-3 Cmnpsis radicans Trumpet DecOr An 3 Cissus tntm-ctlca ICanproo Vine 5, 6 3 Gt.l.t, cmium sempervlrens C. ttolinz Jessaznine 5, 6 3 KKkjclia mrdifolla Heart leaf Pentsimon Lonlcera ~p~al Hon~c~e 2, 5, 6 1'2 X X 2 X Rosa bank~ac Bank~ Rom 50.l-,,um jzsminoides Pouto Vine Teo>marla capcnsls ~ Hone~uckle 5,6 3 4,5,6 2 All 2 An 3 X Riv; Co. Native X X Sun to shade Deciduous, Shade De~duou~, Fazt growth Declduou~ 27 Common Names 14ybrid Bermudagrass Ojuodon dactylon Common ]~rtnuda~a-ss i:estuca e. latior Tall Fescue Lollurn perenne Percnnisl Ryegrass Stenotaphrum sr. cundatum SL Augus'line Grass Zoysia japonica iV, iv. Co. KC Guide Category An 2 All 2-3 All 2-3 All 4 All 5 4,5,6 3 All 3 So/wst Native giv. Co. Native Remarks O EDD O BIDDING PLANTS Common Names Ca'a~um Iomem[osum S~ow in Summer Cosmos bipimsatus Cosmos Cosmos sutphurcous Yellow Cosmos (annual) Eri~hytlum confertifiorum Golden Ytrrow Eschscholzia californica C. alilornia Poppy Gxilhrd;- grandifiora Lolsslafis msritima (annual) Sweet Alyssum Lszpinus runs (-,,-ual) Sky Lupine Oenothera berlandier[ (perennial) Mexican Evening Primrose Evening Primrose ' Portalsca grs~difiora S~2~in~hium helium ~luc-cyed Crrm Riv. Co. I~C $o/Wmt P, iv. Co. Cmidc Cmaegory Native · Native may vary w/species 2-3 All 2;3 2-3 5, 6 2-3 X 1-2. All 3 5, 6 2 An 2-3 All 2-3 An 2-3 5, 6 2 29 X X Remarks Annuals & perennials Yellow to red sun flowers water for compactness Summer Only in zones 2 & 3 .qevera]to annual, seed (GROUND COVZRS) Bo~-,,ical & Couu~n Names Amompbylos 'Can~ Sur' Arctostaphylos "DanYilJe' Arctostapbylos 'Emerald Carpet' Arctostapbyk:,s 'Little Sur' Arctonsphylos "Monterey Carpet' Arcioslapbylos 'Pacilic Mist' Arclostaphylos 'Poinl Reyes' Araoslaphylos 'Sea Spra~ Arctosuphylos uvs-ursi Arciossaphylos 'Winlerglow' Artemi,~ caucasica Saver Spreader Sandhall Sage Alr~|ex semfbaccata ~,stralizu Saltbush GROUND COVERS Riv. Co, KC So/Wsl Riv. Co. Guide Catqory Native Native All 3 X X $,6 2 X 5,6 2 X 5,6 2 5, 6 2 X 5,6 2 X 5,6 2 1, 2 5,6 2 5,6 2 1,2 5, 6 2 5,6 2 ~,6 2 All 2 5,6 3 5,6 1 4,5,6 1 X X X Remarks (GROUND COVERS) · Botanjc~ & ~a Names Bacchsris p~ularis 'Twin Peaks" Dwarf Coyote Brasb Bacr, hazis pihlaris "Pigeon Point" Cganotbus grisius horizontalis Cannel Creeper Ce, sootbus Ce, xnothus 'Y~ee Point' Ccr&~'fium tomentosum Snow in Svmmer Kangaroo Vme Cistus crisp-s Stus corbaricnsls .~hite Rockrose Convolvulus tmeorum Bush Morning Glory Couvolvulus mauritanicus Morning Glory Eriogonum fasciculatum "Wildwood" Fragaria cikiloens~s Ornamental Strawberry He, lianthcmum nummularium Sun Rose Heuchera mazima Island Alumroot Hcuchera sanguinea Aaron's Beard Riv. Co. Guide t 4 3, 4, 6 3,4, 6 , 6 4,5,6 4,5,6 4, 5, 6 3, 4, 5, 6 KC Category 2 2 2 2-3 2-3 2 2 3 I-2 3 3 3 3 So/war Native X X X X X X X Riv, Ca. Native Remarks Sun to shade Some shade in zones I 1 k 13 Needs Shade Needs Shade 0e (GROUND COVERS) Botaniml & Common Names Riv. Co. Guide KC Category 2 2-3 So/W~t Native X Riv. Co. Native Rzmar~ Deer ,t, Rabbit Repelhnt Good all sobs, Erosion Mahonia repens Cry-ping Mahonia Myoporum pacifica M)~porum pa~i~olium Ocnothcra bcrhndieri (perennial) Mcdcan Evening Primrose Oxtwspennum fruticosum Freeway Daisy (African Oueen) Phyh nodiIlora Lippla Pyracantha species F'trethorn I~'bes vibm-nlfolium Evergreen Currant Rosmarinus off. "Prostratus" Dwarf Rosemary Salvia reelMen T~raSeca Salvia sonomensis Creeping Sage l. mvandmr Cotton Sr, ntolina virens Gre~ Santolina ,*'-~um rubrotlnctum .~'ork -9-, ~e, ans '5,6 5,6 3,4, 5,6 5, 6 3, 4, 5,6 2,5,6 2,5,6 All All 5, 6 2-3 3 2-3 2-3 2-3 3 2 3 2 1 2 2 2 2 X X X Requires some shade 32 ~ ,_~GROUND COVERS) ~.~;.7,1~hium bellsun Blue-eyed Grass Trifolium fzqaif~ O'Connor's O'Connor's Legume vmris KC 2 2-3 2-3 So/wst Native X giv. Co. Native X Remarks ITEM NO. 26 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY~ FINANCE OFFICE CITY MANAGER TO: FROMi DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council June S. Greek, City Clerk April 26, 1994 Appointments to Old Town Local Review Board RECOMMENDATION: Review applications and appoint five (5) members and one (1) alternate to serve on the Old Town Local Review Board. BACKGROUND: The newly adopted Old Town Specific Plan calls for the reorganization of the Old Town Historic Review Committee. This committee will serve under the name of the Old Town Local Review Board. At the present time William Harker, Larry Markham, Bob Morris and Walt Allen make up the Historic Review Committee. All but Mr. Allen submitted applications to serve on the newly organized Local Review Board and Mr. Allen has requested that, although he inadvertently missed the deadline for submitting an application, he also be included for consideration. In addition, four other applications were received.' ATTACHMENTS: Applications for appointment: Rich Soltysiak Robert J. Lord Viola I. Sanchez William A. Harker Robert J. Gorham Robert D. Morris Larry R. Markham Walt Allen, (application submitted 10-7-91 ) JSG R:~agendm.rpt%A. ocdRev.App I CITY OF TEMECULA : APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO COMMIS ' ' Qualification ReQuirement: Resident of City of Temecula COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU WISH TO SERVE: NAME: Rich Soltysiak ADDRESS: 30519 Wailea Court HOME PHONE: 676-1470 OCCUPATION: OLD TOWN ADVISORY YEARS RESIDENT OF TEMECULA: Seven WORK PHONE: 676-1470 Wisconsin - 1979 Engineer, State of California - 1983 Civil Engineering Consultant EMPLOYER/ADDRESS: Self-employed EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND/DEGREES: BS/CE Marquette University, Milwaukee, Registered Civil LIST ANY RIVERSIDE COUNTY OR OTHER CITY COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU HAVE SERVED AND THE YEAR OF SERVICE: Temecula and Murrieta Coordinating Committee since 1991 ORGANIZATIONS TO WHICH YOU BELONG: (Professional, technical, community, service): Murrieta Chamber of Commerce / Temecula-Murrieta Economic Development BRIEFLY STATE WHY YOU WISH TO SERVE ON THIS COMMISSION, AND WHY YOU BELIEVE YOU ARE QUALIFIED FOR THE POSITION. BE SPECIFIC {Use additional paper if necessary): See attached Corp. I understand that any or all information on this form may be verified. I consent to the release of this information for public' ur o s. SIGNATURE: ' ~ DATE: 3/15/94 PL ations will be kept on file for consideration of future vacancies. Retum to: City Clerk's Office, 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, CA 92390 (714) 694-1989 2/forme/COM-OO 1 D~SI~ TO S~RVE ON OLD TOWN ADVISORY ~OMMISSION I consider myself fortunate to have lived and worked 'in the Temecula area since 1986. During this period I have developed a sense of civic pride and would be honored to serve on the Old Town Advisory Commission and assist in making decisions which play a role in the redevelopment of Old Town. Serving on the Old Town Advisory Commission would provide me the opportunity to contribute back to the community. My professional background qualifies me to contribute informed input on various issues Old Town will face. I believe well planned, realistic, and organized redevelopment combined with a historical sensitivity are essential elements to both improving and preserving Old Town. Old Town is a unique and valuable asset in many ways to our community. It provides a glimpse back into Temecula's history while also serving a commercial purpose. Old Town is a natural compliment to our beautiful wine country. With complex issues circulating from redevelopment financing, a new specific plan, and proposals from land developers; I believe it is essential that members of the Old Town Advisory Committee understand the technical, political, and fiscal impacts of these issues. OUALIFICATIONS TO SERVE ON OLD TOWN ADVISORY COMMISSION My professional background, centered around civil engineering, ranges from experience as a County Civil Engineer, to Director of Engineering in a consulting firm, to Project Manager in a land development company. Currently I am the sole proprietor of my own consulting firm. With previous experience as both a consultant and project manager in land development; I have addressed planning commissions, city councils, and county boards of supervisors on many applications for land development. I have extensive experience in the overall land development process from entitlements to construction. Recently I was nominated as a finalist for the planning commission seat vacated by Dennis Chiniaeff. During city council public discussions to make the final selection, it was disheartening to hear Councilman Sal Munoz make an independent determination that I would be faced with potential conflicts of interests if appointed. This uninformed determination was made without any interview or discussions with me. I trust this selection process will be more objective and consider each applicant's individual qualifications to serve on the Old Town Advisory Committee. CITY OF TEMECULA ..~ APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO COMMISSION .. c~v' Qualifmation Requirement: Resident of City of Temecula NAME: Robert J. Lord YEARS RESIDENT ADDRESS: 30120 :pechanga Dr. Mai._~ng address: :P.O. Box 69, Temecula 92593 OFTEMECULA: 20 plus HOME PHONE: OCCUPATION: Property Management and Development Co. owner(R.E. Broker/B contractor) EM PLO YER/ADDRESS: ~6~0 Fr~+ S± m~m.~m~l~, n~. 92~90(.Mai!in~ P.O. Bo~ 69) ED~eATIONALBAC~ROUNDIDE~REES: 3~ yrs HS, ~ED equmva-ency US2~U, approximately ~'s credit JC general. Have artended classes, taken courses, participated in seminars. and accomplished sel~ study ~o meet my need and satisfy my curiosity. Have participated in development and watched growth and shrinkage over forty years in Calilornia. See attached resume. YOU HAVE SERVED AND THE YEAR OF SERVICE: ;; o n e ORGANIZATIONS TO WHICH YOU BELONG: (Professional, technical, community, service): ~' ~ Town Temecula ch tssociation S~rved as Treasurer ior 1993 ~ ~ Her ants . . BRIEFLY STATE WHY YOU WISH TO SERVE ON THIS COMMISSION, AND WHY YOU BELIEVE YOU ARE QUALIFIED FOR E new specific plan. I attended all the Steering Committee meetings, although not an appointed member. I believe that the (re)development cf Cld Town must be controlled to achieee the goals of the plan, but ;hat development must be, not only promoted, but facilitated to achieve ;hose goa.,s. Having studied old western towns, I feel able to serve my community best in sitting on this board. I understand that any or all information on this form may be verified. I consent to the release of this Return to: C'~/E~C(lerk's Office, 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, CA 92390 (714) 694-1989 2/formsiC OM-O0 1 ROBERT J. LORD P.O. Box 69, Temecula, Ca. 92390 (714) 699-4264 EXPERIENCE 1981 - 1989 1979 - 1981 1978-1979 1976-1978 1973-1976 '>I':"7 "".""" CORTEZ MANAGEMENT COMPANY, VISTA Resident manager, Temecula Villas. Responsible for all onsite management of ninety-six unit project. Controlled landlord/tenant relations from rental negotiations to moveout. Originated certification for HUD section 8 and FmHA deep subsidy tenant assistance. Managed all onsite maintenance and repairs to preserve and improve asset and to insure the quiet enjoyment of tenants of the project. SELF EMPLOYED CONTRACTOR, TEMECULA Remodeled building, including renovation, demolition and repairs. Manufactured custom designed furniture. Performed maintenance. Developed market survey. area prospectus and format for specific offering presentation. GENERAL BUILDING CONTRACTOR AND REALTOR, TEMECULA Real Estate development and sales. MESA REALTY, SAN DIEGO Sales and sales management. Sold condominiums and single family homes. Managed sales office. Procured financing to insure success of sales operations. KAISER AETNA, RANCHO CALIFORNIA Residential sales manager. Managed new home sales department, model home show, and escrow oversight. Controlled maintenance, interior design, and finishing touches to product line. Processed all loans. Established systems and procedures to insure orderly processing of home sales. Managed design center. 1961-1973 1956-1961 REAL ESTATE, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA Salesman and sales manager with various firms. Marketed homes and estates. hired and trained sales personnel, prepared area studies, campaigns and advertising literature. Aided developers in design, interiors, features and landscape. PACIFIC AIRMOTIVE CORPORATION, BURBANK Material handler. Shipping and receiving clerk. Traffic rate clerk. Traffic dispatcher. Customer service representative. Salesman. Sold engines and engine overhauls to small airlines and corporate aircraft operators. Developed sales program, assisted in advertis- ing development, and corporate policy for processing warranty claims. LICENSES PERSONAL Real Estate Broker General Contractor A<Je, Sa4~ born 1934 Married CITY OF TEMECULA ~ APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO COMMISS . t'~ :::/= .i: - Qualification Requirement: Resident of City of Temecula COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU WISH TO SERVE: Old Town Temecula :~ocal Review Board NAME: Viola I. Sanchez ADDRESS: 45359 Tesiben Court Temecula, California 92592 HOME PHONE: (909) 694-0724 OCCUPATION: Property Manager/Real Estate Manager EMPLOYER/ADDRESS: 41593 Winchester Road, Suite 105, Temecula, CA EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND/DEGREES: BB~ Business Economics California Real Estate License YEARS RESIDENT OF TEMECULA: 2 years WORK PHONE: (909) 676-1500 92590 Real Property Administrator - Building Owners and Managers Association LIST ANY RIVERSIDE COUNTY OR OTHER CITY COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU HAVE SERVED AND THE YEAR OF SERVICE: None ORGANIZATIONS TO WHICH YOU BELONG: {Professional, technical, community; sewice): Arts Council of Temecula BRIEFLY STATE WHY YOU WISH TO SERVE ON THIS COMMISSION, AND WHY YOU BELIEVE YOU ARE QUALIFIED FOR THE POSITION. BE SPECIFIC (Use addMonal paper ff necessa~): It is my. intention to become mbre actively involved in the community, and I feel my extensive Real Estate and Financial background would be an asset to the local review board. As a manager of real estate, you must be familiar with and interact with various groups in the community where your properties are located. I have had experience in dealing with different city agencies as it relates to construction and environemntal issues. Also, understanding your busi- nesses and being sensitive to their needs, along with knowing the right tenant mix, is the key to successful Real Estate Management. The prospect of being in- volved with and Dart of thelocal review sparks my interest immenselY, and I am lunde~tandthmany or ~1 ~formation on thisformmaybeverified. Iconsenttothe ~lease of th~ information for publicity , oses. 2/fom'e/COM.-O01 very willing to devote my time and energy to the Board. CITY OF TEMECULA ~,; · APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO COMMIS~IpN.:~..~. E Qualif~,ation Requirement: Resident of City of Temecula COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU WISH TO SERVE: NAME: l~lu_, Ar~ ~, ADDRESS: HOME PHONE: OCCUPATION: EM PLO YER/ADDRESS: EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND/DEGREES: YEARS RESIDENT OF TEMECULA: ~ WORK PHONE: G'7(=- 4"7 I $ LIST ANY RIVERSIDE COUNTY OR OTHER CITY COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU HAVE SERVED AND THE YEAR OF SERVICE: ORGANIZATIONS TO WHICH YOU BELONG: (Profess~nal, technical, commune,' se~ice): BRIEFLY STATE WHY YOU WISH TO SERVE ON THIS COMMISSION, AND WHY YOU BELIEVE YOU ARE QUALIFIED FOR THE POSITION. BE SPECIFIC {Use 8ddaion81 paper ff I undemtand ~at any or ~1 ~fo~on on ~b fo~ may be verBed. I consent to ~e release of intormstion tor ' ' . SIGNATURE: ~~:P~~ DA~: M~ ~. ~, I~ ~ % P~SE NO~: Appl~ wil be kept on ~e for consideration of ~re vacancies. ReNm to: C~ Clerk~s Office, 43174 ~s~ess Park Drive, Temecula, CA 9~90 (714) 6~1989 2/forms/COM-O01 CITY OF TEMECULA ~ '.~i:. ' ( APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO COMMISSION .:/ ~y -=--~_,.,_:::~ .(,'~'-~ Qualif~,ation Requirement: Residem of City of Temecula "" COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU WISH TO SERVE: OLD TOWN TEMECULA LOCAL REVIEW BOARD NAME: ROBERT J. GORHAM ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 890040 TEMECULA, CA. 92589 HOME PHONE: 909 676-7797 OCCUPATION: PRESIDENT - THE GORHAM COMPANY, EMPLOYER/ADDRESS: YEARS RESIDENT OF TEMECULA: WORK PHONE: 909 736-1750 8 YRS INC. GENERAL BUILDING & ENGINEERING CONTRACTOR 110 N. LINCOLN AVE. SUITE 100 CORONA, CA. 91720 EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND/DEGREES: AA DEGREE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT & CONSTRUCTION TECHNOLOGY LICENSED BUILDING AND ENGINEERING CONTRACTOR ASBESTOS CERTIFIED LIST ANY RIVERSIDE COUNTY OR OTHER CITY COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU HAVE SERVED AND THE YEAR OF SERVICE: NONE ORGANIZATIONS TO WHICH YOU BELONG: (Professional, technical, community, service): STATE OF CALIF. CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ABC-ASSOCIATED BUILDING CONTRACTORS BRIEFLY STATE WHY YOU WISH TO SERVE ON THIS COMMISSION, AND WHY YOU BELIEVE YOU ARE QUALIFIED FOR THE POSITION. BE SPECIFIC (Use additional paper if necessary): SEE ATTACHED NARATIVE AND ENCLOSURES ,o o. ,,,. ,o,., .,..--...,.,...., ,o ,.. ,.,... o, ,,. :/~ : 3/9/94 SIGNAT::SE NO/E: A ions will be kept on fde for conaiD:er%on of future vacancies. Return to City Clerk : ' ' ' , ' ess Park Drive, Temecula, CA 92390 (714) 694-1989 2/forms/COM-OO1 The Gotham Co., Inc. Buildmg/Engineenng Contractors St I.;=. A.B & ASB .463472 110 N. Lincoln. Suite 100, Coronr~. Califorma 91720 (909) 736.1750, FAX (909) 736-6132, FAX (909) 736-1772 In am a resident of the City of Temecula and therefore concerned with the city's planned developments, especially Old Town. I have always felt Old Town was unique in nature and history rendering great potential. I was very excited when I heard about the proposed restoration and development of Old Town. I feel I possess many of the qualities required to fill a position on the Review Board. I have been involved in construction for the past 30 years. The Gorham Company has been involved in public works construction in Southern California since 1981. I have successfully completed over :$40 million in public works projects of all types and complexities. Some of these projects have included extensive historical restoration i.e.; The Old Orange County Courthouse Restoration, included interior restoration of a building constructed in 1902, including all the courtrooms, judges chambers, county clerks office and numerous other rooms. The Fullerton Museum Restoration also constructed in the early 1900's, The Fullerton Police Dept. renovation & restoration of the original city council chambers, and The City of Signal Hill, City Hall exterior building restoration are some of the other projects that I have worked on. Because of my extensive construction and restoration experience I understand the importance of preserving the historical value of a structure and incorporating current local and state building codes. I am very familiar with current costs of all types of construction including restoration. I would be able to provide value engineering which would be very important especially when trying to meet budgets on restoration work as well as new construction. Because I deal with public entities daily on large and small projects, I understand the complexities and problems that a project of this magnitude can encounter. I consider myself a team player and feel I would be an asset to the board. I am very interested and willing to fill this position if chosen. Thank you for your consideration. R E S U M E The Gorharn Company, Incorporated N. Lincoln Avenue · Suite 100 Corona, California 91720 (909) 736-1750 FAX (909) 736-6132 Contractor's License #4(~3472 Classifications: A, B & ASB. Certified COMPLETED PROJECTS KING/DREW MED. CENTER EMERGENCY ROOM ADDITION, NEW PEDIATRICS FACILITY, SITEWORK FOR TRAUMA CENTER County of Los Angeles 550 S. Vermont Los Angeles, CA AI Fathy (213) 738-2180 $3.2 Million · aILJ I 11"1 BLDG. 299 INTERIOR REPAIRS & EQUIPMENT INSTALLATION LONG BEACH NAVAL STATION ROICC Bldg. 5 Contracts Office Long Beach, CA 90822-5080 (310) 547-6875 Contract#N68711-91 -C-0446 WILSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL MODERNIZATION & AIR CONDITIONING Santa Ana Unified School District 1405 French St. Santa Ana, CA 92701 Jim Muhic (714) 558-5597 5450,000 PEARBLOSSOM WAREHOUSE EXPANSION Spec. 92-14 Contract -'C50964 Dept. of Water Resources P.O. Box 1112 Lancaster, CA 93584 George Dolaos (805) 946-1024 S600,000 FULLERTON POLICE DEPARTMENT REMODEL City of Fullerton 303 Com'monweattn Ave. Fullerton, CA Ken' Head (714) 738-6853 $513,134 OLD ORANGE COUNTY COURTHOUSE RENOVATION County of Orange/GSA 14 Civic Center Plaza Santa Ana, CA Cornelia Rasco (714) 834-5690 $900,000 C OMPLETE ontinued D PROJECTS IF't1 · aBLE I It-1 · 'elf I Ik__e-a SOUTHWEST SENIOR CENTER City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza Santa Aria, CA David Ip (714) 565-4042 $1,246,781 WINDEMERE PARK COMMUNITY CENTER City of La Miracla Michael Shea, AIA (818) 795-6474 $482,665 CITY MAINTENANCE FACILITY RESTORATION & NEW FACIUTY City of Brea John Olliver (714) 990-7642 $926,768 The Gorham Co.., Inc. BUILDING/ENt'~'EERING CONTRACTORS Our commitment to 'performandei quali~/,.int. egrlty, ._and hones~ are contributing"~.:" factors to the company~s immediate sti~:cess~' along with our highly 'e~erienced.' management staff'and Support te_,im,-".~.~'::L. ~-~.~ '.:--..""'... -- '--' .. .rid ne. aSni ' .nO.,,Wiai n. tS'of , . , . .. sizes, budgets, timetable_s; and complexitf.es~'~ori"i~rOjeCts'ranging from' straightforward, multipurpose buildings to complex and defied historical"""' · restoratiorls. " "' "' ' 'E: " ' - .... ,.-. :: .f ~ :. -.. .. _ "'.- .' - ,;' '..-T/". ":"" '- : ........ ' ...... ? ':'~: · . ... , -; . . , .~<. ' ..., -.. . '- OUr ability to meet the rigorous requirements' of agencieiS involved in the . '-: ,' E'L :-':'-..~ construction of pubnc sector .projects has consis.tently enabled us to produce .... facilities for clients wig their time frame and budget. '- ""' · ' · . '..~Z. .. ':-. ".:.:".7:..::~ Our Financial strength, bonding capacity and .experience, provide the stability,.. .: ;' '.~':.';~ .... '- dependability and construction performance that you, 'as clients, should. professionsHy expect of a general contractor that functions as an -'-: ""- extension of your interests. "" · '.- .' The Gorham Company. Inc. has.successfully completed hundreds of l~rivate'and ~' :.: .r :::'~ public works projects. ..-, - - ' '-.~... ;~i~' · 7';.. ;,~. · .... ' . Z- _ ' j..'~' ,.',T~ - . - . - - ,, .- .. ., .' .. '~,._T. CITY OF TEMECULA APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO COMMISS Qualification Requirement: Resident of City of Temecula COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU WISH TO SERVE: NAME: ADDRESS: HOME PHONE: OCCUPATION: EMPLOYER/ADDRESS: EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND/DEGREES: YEARS RESIDENT OF TEMECULA: WORK PHONE: LIST ANY RIVERSIDI~OUNT R OTHER CITY COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU HAVE SERVED AND I H R OF SERVICE: ORGANIZATIONS TO WHICH YOU BELONG: IProfessional, technical, community, service): BRIEFLY STATE WHY YOU WISH TO SERVE ON THIS COMMISSION, AND WHY YOU BELIEVE YOU ARE QUALIFIED FOR THE POSITION, BE SPECIFIC (Use additional paper if necessary): I understand ~at any or al ~form~ion on ~is form may be verified. I consent to ~e rele * PL~SE NO~: Applica~ons wi be kept on rde t~[consider~ion of ~re vacancies. Return to: C~ ~erk's Office, 43~74 ~siness Park Dr~e, Temecula, CA 9~90 (7J4) 69~J989 APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO COMMISS.: · - 5 L" Qualification Requirement: Resident of City of Temecula' - COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU WISH TO SERVE: Old Town Temecula Local Review Board NAME: Larry R. Markham ADDRESS: 30105 Cabrillo Avenue YEARS RESIDENT OF TEMECULA: 2 HOME PHONE: WORK PHONE: 694-8536 676-6672 OCCUPATION: Development Consultant - Self employed EMPLOYER/ADDRESS: 41750 Winchester Rd,, Suite N Temecula EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND/DEGREES: See attached LIST ANY RIVERSIDE COUNTY OR OTHER CITY COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU HAVE SERVED AND THE YEAR OF SERVICE: See attached ORGANIZATIONS TO WHICH YOU BELONG:(Professional, technical, community, service): See attached BRIEFLY STATE WHY YOU WISH TO SERVE ON THIS COMMISSION, AND WHY YOU BELIEVE YOU ARE QUALIFIED FOR THE POSITION. BE SPECIFIC (Use addMonal pa~r necessa~): I feel that my continued *partiCipation in the Review Board will bring the benefit of my engineering and construction experience and education to bear on the issues effecting the implementation of'the Old Town Specific Plan and the financial viability of the Old Town businesses. I understand that any or all information on this form may be ve~fied. I consent to the release of this information for publicity purposes. SIGNATURE: ,~ DATE: ~ ~ ' PLEASE, NOTE: Applications will be kept on file for consideration o Retum to: City Clerk's Office, 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, CA 92390 (714) 694-1989 2/formelCOIV~O0 1 LARRY MARKHAM PRINCIPLE EDUCATION: Master of Science Civil Engineering Virginia Polytechnic Institute Bachelor of Science Civil Engineering Virginia Polytechnic Institute LICENSE: Civil Engineer, California 1979 PROFESSIONAL ORGANIZATIONS: See Attached Mr. Markha~'s broad background in civil engineering, land planning, environmental planning, development management and governmental relations since 1970 provides a rich resource to the diverse clientele of Markham and Associates in obtaining project entitlements. The investment of public service to the communities of Riverside County allows for a level of insight into the various approval processes unsurpassed in the local development and building industry. MARKHAM & ASSOCIATES PRINCIPLE - 1981 TO PRESENT Responsible for ehe planning, approval and implementation of over 600 projects during the past 12 years, ranging from minor additions to full scale master planned communities. ALBERT C. MARTIN AND ASSOCIATES CIVIL PROJECT ENGINEER - 1978 - 1981 Responsibilities include supervision of site plans for a variety of residential and commercial developments. Coordinates design of drainage, 'grading, road alignments, horizontal and vertical controls and utilities. Coordination efforts encompass liaison with government agencies and estimation of budget and time frameworks. LARRY MARKHAM PAGE 2 LOCKHEED-CALIFORNIA COMPANY CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER - 1977 - 1978 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER - 1976 - 1977 Responsible for construction activity in a 4.6 million square foot manufacturing and office area, including contracting, coordination scheduling, budget compliance, inspection and variance negotiations. Projects include a variety of manufacturing and office facilities. Developed and programmed computer programs for optimum design and analysis of composite material and metallic structures. WOLFE AND FORMAN ENGINEERS, INC. ENGINEER IN TRAINING - 1970 - 1973 Construction responsibilities included surveying, field supervision and liaison during initial and final phases of site work.. Engineering duties included 'structural design, detailing and drafting. Participated in numerous material handling and material preparation. facilities during both design and construction. LARRY R. HARKHAM ORGANIZATIONS (Past and Present) -The Valley Group -The Murrieta Temecula Group, President -American Society of Civil Engineers -American Planning Association. -Urban Land Institute -Friends of Murrieta Schools -Friends of French Valley Airport, President -Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce -Murrieta Valley Chamber of Commerce -Wildomar Valley Chamber of Commerce -Temecula Town Association -International Congress of Building Officials -Building Industry Association -Audubon Society -Nature Conservancy -Rancho California Business Center Architectural Control Committee -Temecula Sunrise Rotary Club -University of California, Riverside - Extension Instructor -First Pacific National Bank, Director (Temecula Valley National Bank) -Bear Creek Greens Committee, Chairman -Bear Creek Golf Club, Director -Optimist Club -Ridgegate Homeowners Association, Director, President LARRY R. MARKHAM ORGANIZATIONS PAGE 2 -Los Ranchitos Homeowners Association, Director, President -Community Recreation Center Building Foundation, Board of Directors -County of Riverside Coordinating Committee -City of Temecula Coordinating Committee -City of Murrieta Coordinating Committee COMMITTEES AND COMMISSIONS 1985-1986 and 1989~1992 Murrieta Creek Citizens Advisory Committee, Vice- Chairman 1986-1989 South West Area Plan Citizens Advisory Committee 1987-1991 Temecula Redevelopment Citizens Advisory Committee 1991-Present Rancho California Water District Citizens Advisory Committee 1990-1993 County Service Area 143 Citizens Advisory Committee 1991-Present Old Town Historic Review'Committee 1992-1993 Old Town Specific Plan Steering Committee 1992-Present City of Murrieta, General Plan Citizens Advisory Committee, Vice-Chairman 1992-1993 City of Temecula, Land Use Technical Subcommittee to the General Plan 1992-Present City of Temecula, Development Code Advisory Committee 1993-Present French Valley Airport Citizens Advisory Committee CITY OF TEMECULA APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO COMMISSION Qualification Requirement: Resident of City of Temecula COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU WISH TO SERVE: NAME: ,~,~.,{.. HOME PHONE: OCCUPATION: EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND/DEGREES: ~C--~P- '~'o ~C--~tE~ YEARS RESIDENT OF TEMECULA: LIST ANY RIVERSIDE COUNTY OR OTHER CITY COMIV ITTEE OR COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU HAVE SERVED AND THE YEAR OF SERVICE: ORGANIZATIONS TO WHICH YOU BELONG: (Professioqal, technical, community, service): BRIEFLY STATE WHY YOU WISH TO SERVE ON THIS COMMISSION, AND WHY YOU BELIEVE YOU ARE QUALIFIED FOR THE POSITION. BE SPECIFIC (Use additional paper if necessaryh i understand that any or all information on this form may be verified. I consent to the release of this information for pu I ity purposes. SE kept on file for consideration of future vacancies," Return to: City Clerk's Office, 43172 Business Park Drive, Temecula, CA 92390 (714} 694-1989 2fiormslCOM-O01 October 7, i991 City Council City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, California 92590 Re: Appointment to Old Town Historic Review Committee Dear Members of the Council: Thank you for the opportunity to apply for this community service position. I am honored that you feel me to be worthy of consideration. Enclosed, please find the application you sent, accompanied by a brief but reasonably recent resume of my work history. I'hope that will suffice for your purposes. I am particularly pleased to have the opportunity to serve the Community in an area where I feel I have both some small amount of expertise and more than a passing interest. It is not often that one can separate business incentive from long developed technical knowledge and experience. But in this case, as a member of the Old Town Historic Review Committee, I feel I can bring both the technical/aesthetic expertise and an even-handed, fair-minded influence to the review table. - . As I mentioned above, much of my Dackground and expertise are in · the area of architecture. As'a student I was very 'interested in architectural history. Though'the history of architecture is very long and the history of American architecture is relatively short, the formative period of Western American architecture was very rich, indeed. In fact, there were probably more legitimate popular. styles in the 19th Century than in any century before ~(or since.) As a river tour guide and camper, I have had the.opportunity to see many..of.the old towns and cities~of the'West. There are several aspects that they all seem to-share,~while yet maintaining'their -own individuality. .There is a certain eclectic quality in both western public architecture and vernacular buildings of the 19th and early 20th Century. For this reason, I feel there are a number of ways to look at building and/or planning proposals. Perhaps there is one "appropriate" style for Old Town, as some suggest. But I sincerely doubt it. I think the flavor of the Old West can be maintained without stifling the creativity of good designers and planners of today. Finally, I ~m connected to no large development company or planning firm. I have little to gain by appeasing powerful developers. I am not particularly intimidated by money, and I feel no obligation other than to my conscience and the citizens of and visitors the to the City of Temecula. I am excited by some of the work which has been undertaken in Old Town during the past three or four years. I feel that, for the most part, the.work done recently has been tasteful and sensitive. The Review Committee has obviously worked hard to set the tone for development, rehabilitation, or renovation. But, as we are all aware, there are still problems to solve. A great deal of time and often thankless effort go with a position such as this. I am fully aware of the difficult, and sometimes awkward situations in which committee members find themselves. I am fully prepared to dedicate the time and make the commitment necessary to perform the duties required of me as a member of th~ Old Town Historic Review Committee. Again, I thank you for thinking of me and am pleased to offer my talents and energy to assist this very important committee. Yours, very truly, Walt Allen ITEM NO. 27 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY~,~ FINANCE OFFICE CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Harwood T. Edvalson, Assistant City Managery April 26, 1994 BROADCAST SPONSORSHIP OF COUNCIL MEETINGS RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the attached guidelines for broadcast sponsorship of City Council meetings, or other City initiated programming. BACKGROUND: Both Council and staff have been approached by business owners interested in providing sponsorship of Council Meeting broadcasts on Inland Valley Cablevision. The franchise agreement with Inland Valley allows for sponsorship of programming, but prohibits commercials. The attached proposed guidelines have been prel~ared with input from the City's attorneys and credit guidelines from KCET Public Television. FISCAL ANALYSIS: The City is currently paying approximately $700 per meeting for video taping services. Staff proposes to sell sponsorships based on the attached guidelines. It is the City's intent to recover, as much as possible, the full cost of video taping or broadcast of programming. CITY OF TEMECULA PROGRAM SPONSORSHIP GUIDELINES Sponsorships for' broadcast of programming initiated by the City of Temecula are subject to, the overall test of whether the sponsorship is consistent with the noncommercial character of government access television. Primary Soonsors - Acknowledgements run at the beginning and end of programming. No more than two primary sponsors will be permitted per program. A 10-15 second message will be allowed for each sponsor. Hourly Sponsors - Acknowledgements run at the conclusion of each hour of programming. No more than one sponsor may be acknowledged per hour of programming. A 10-15 second message will be allowed for hourly sponsors. Sponsorship Content- (1) The acknowledgement may consist of one or two slides, cards or character generator graphics. (2) The acknowledgement may include name, address, and/or telephone number of the sponsor. (3) Audio may be vocal or musical. (4) Audio may state information on card, but must contain the following lead announcement: Primary Sponsors - "This governmental access program has been presented through the assistance of... name, address, and telephone number). Hourly-Sponsors - "The preceding hour of governmental access programming has been presented with the assistance of ... name, address, and telephone number). (5) The content may: Describe your business, mentioning up to four target markets, products or services Show one product or generically depict up to four product lines Show company employees as an alternative to product depiction Use a company slogan (acceptable in most cases) (6) The content may not: Use a celebrity spokesperson Use language or slogans that: * are qualitative ("maker of the finest") * make superlative or comparative statements ("Temecula's largest retailer of...") * are a call to action or inducement to buy ("visit our showroom, or call... ") * include endorsements ("the choice of Chamber of Commerce members... ") Sponsorship Rates - Rates for sponsorship of Council Meeting programming are set to cover the cost of video taping, which is currently $700 per meeting. Rates may be adjusted as costs increase. The current rates are as follows: Primary Sponsors - $200 per meeting. Hourly Sponsors - $1 O0 per hour. ITEM 28 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPRO AL CITY ATTORNEY ~ FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning.]2~ April 26, 1994 Procedures and Recommendations for Notice of Public Hearing Prepared By: RECOMMENDATION: BACKGROUND Matthew Fagan, Assistant Planner Provide Direction to Staff regarding the Implementation of Notice of Public Hearing Procedures This item was continued at the April 5, 1994 City Council meeting. No discussion of the item occurred at the meeting. Attachments: 1. City Council Staff Report dated April 5, 1994- Page 2 R:\STAFFRPT\NOPH-3.CC 4/12/94 mf 1 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT APRIL 5, 1994 R:\STAFFRPT\NOPH-3,CC 4/12/94 mf 2 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: -~PPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning~'~' April 5, 1994 Procedures and Recommendations for Notice of Public Hearing Prepared By: Matthew Fagan, Assistant Planner RECOMMENDATION: Provide Direction to Staff regarding the Implementation of Notice of Public Hearing Procedures BACKGROUND Planning Staff was directed by the City Council to review present Notice of Public Hearing (NOPH) procedures. Staff conducted this review of the following issue areas: in-house generation of adjacent homeowner notification labels, a revised NOPH flyer, a-criteria for a standard exhibit for the vicinity map contained on the NOPH flyer, a new sign for posting the site, and additional exposure in the newspaper, posting the site upon application submittal and minimum number of residents to be notified. Staff presented an assessment of the current procedures for handling NOPH, as well as suggestions for improving the prbcess to the Planning Commission on March 21, 1994 (Planning Commission minutes are not available as of the date of this report). The Planning Commission concurred with Staff recommendations for the following items: in- house generation of adjacent homeowner notification labels, a revised NOPH flyer, a criteria for a standard exhibit for the vicinity map contained on the NOPH flyer, a new sign for posting the site, and additional exposure in the newspaper. Examples of new signs for po. sting the site have been included as Attachment No. 2. Two designs are for posting the NOPH (one has a map with the location of City Hall on it). Another design contains the hearing body and the date of the hearing. An exhibit has been prepared for a Notice of Application Submittal. The Planning Commission was split in terms of posting the site upon application submittal. They voiced concerns about potential length of time that signs could remain posted on the site (i.e., some Specific Plans could be .posted up to several years), the effectiveness of the posting at application submittal time and potential maintenance costs for the signs. The Commission recommended that Staff devise specific criteria for determining the minimum number of residents to be notified. Although the Commission felt that it was important to inform adjacent residents of pending hearings, they felt that to notify residents based on a specific number of residents was arbitrary. R:\STAFFRPT\NOPH-2,CC 3/29/94 ktb 1 FISCAL IMPACT Fiscal impacts listed below are based upon thirty-one (31) Planning Commission and twenty (20) City Council items that needed to be posted in 1993. Potential impacts from implementing the above referenced procedures are as follows: Cost for posting site for Notice of Application Submittal: e50.00 per posting (Add approximately 91 2.00 per sign for specific use) Total: 93162.00 Cost for fabricating/replacing Notice of Application Submittal signs: 9150.00 per sign. Assumption is that twenty (20) signs will be needed. Total: 93000.00. Cost for posting site for Notice of Public Hearing: $50.00 per posting (Add approximately 915.00 per sign for specific use and specific hearing date). Total: 93315.00~ Cost for fabricating/replacing Notice of Public Hearing signs: 9:150.00 per sign. Assumption is that twenty (20) signs will be needed. Total: $3000.00. Total approximate cost for new signs/posting for application submittal/Notice of Public Hearing: 912,477.00· Approximate cost for Staff to generate notification labels in-house: 9125.00 (to be · passed on to the applicant). Attachments: Planning Commission Staff Report March 21,1994- Page 3 Noticing Sign Exhibits - Page 4 R:\STAFFRPT\NOPH-2.CC 3/30/94 ktb 2 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MARCH 21, 1994 R:\STAFFRPT\NOPH-2.CC $/]0/~4 ktb 3 MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission FROM: Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning DATE: March 21, 1994 SUBJECT: Planning Department Procedures for Noticing Public Hearings and Recommendations for Improving the Noticing Process Prepared By: Matthew Fagan, Assistant Planner Linda Beaudoin, Planning Technician RECOMMENDATION: REVIEW the attached Staff Report on Current Notice of Public Hearing Procedures RECOMMEND a Notice of Public Hearing Procedure to the City Council BACKGROUND Planning Staff has been directed by the City Council to review present Notice of Public Hearing (NOPH) procedures. Staff has conducted this review and will present an assessment of the current procedures for handling NOPH as well as suggestions for improving this process. DISCUSSION Current NOPH Procedure The current procedure for NOPH is as follows: Notification Labels: Staff receives the notification labels as part of the application submittal. The guidelines for preparing the notification labels are included with the application and are attached as Attachment No. 1. These labels are typically prepared for the applicant by a Title Company and a certification letter must accompany the labels (Reference Attachment No. 2). Projects that will be heard by the Planning Director require property owners within a 300 foot radius from the project be notified. Those projects that will go before the Planning Commission and/or the City Council require property owners within a 600 foot radius from the project be notified· The labels are verified by staff to be accurate and that they reflect the correct area to be notified. Notices are mailed to the property owners within the proper radius from the site. This notice is also attached to the sign that is posted on the site. R:\STAFFRPT\NOPH.PC 3/15/g~, ktb 1 Notification of Homeowner's Associations Within the Project Area: Staff has recently started notifying Homeowners Associations (HOA) that may be affected by the project at the Development Review Committee (DRC) level. Staff. determines which HOA's are affected by the project by reviewing the City's HOA map and assessing those HOA's that abut the project or take access from the same road as the project. A letter is then mailed to the Association along with a copy of the proposed project. A City Staff contact person is named in the letter. Posting of the Site: The site is posted with a 4' high by 4' wide bright yellow sign prior to the date of the hearing body. Depending-upon noticing requirements imposed by state law, the sign will be placed upon the site 10, 20, or 30 days prior to the hearing. Additional Notification: In addition to the above methods of noticing property owners and HOA's that may be affected by development proposals, the project is also noticed at the following places: a. In front of City* Hall; b. At the Temecula Library; c. At the Temecula Town Association; and d. In The Californian Newspaper. Recommended Chanaes to the Current NOPH PrOcedure Alternative Sources of Notification Labels: Staff has looked into acquiring the notification labels from a source other than Title Companies. Two alternative sources of notification labels are discussed below. A third option would be to encourage the Title Companies to include a standard exhibit in their package that would afford Staff the opportunity to spot check the validity of the labels. In-House Generation of Labels. Staff has the capability of generating the notification labels in-house. The process would involve the time of the Information Systems Administrator, the Case Planner, and an Office Assistant. Materials would include the Assessor's Pages, labels and a form to fill out to give to the Information Systems Administrator. Estimated current cost for this process would be approximately $200.00 per application. Currently, it is also estimated that Staff will have the time to generate the labels. The benefit from using this process is that it would place the responsibility for this function on the Planning Staff to assure that the notification labels are correct and complete. Outside Contractual Service. Staff was contacted by an individual who will also provide the service of generating the notification labels. They have stated that they have started to provide this service for Title Companies. They currently charge 91 .00 per label with a minimum charge of 975.00 per project. The benefit from this service is that there is a specific individual that will be held responsible for the accuracy of the labels. The shortcoming of this system is that the cost could be expensive for applicants. R:\STAFFRPT\NOPH.PC 3/15/9~ ktb 2 Standard exhibit for radius package. One other option is to create new criteria for the Title Companies to follow that will assure that the correct information is supplied to Staff. One way to accomplish this would be to require them to provide an exhibit (the Assessor's Index Page) in the submittal that would show the parcel in question along with all of the parcels within the specific radius range. An example of this is included as Attachment No. 3. In addition to showing the radius and each parcel, they would also have to (identify on the exhibit) all of the Assessor's pages. Staff feels that this option would resolve the problems that we have been experiencing in the past. Revised NOPH Flyer. Staff has created a revised NOPH notice that is mailed to the affected property owners (Reference Attachment No. 4 for current notice and Attachment No. 5 for the revised notice). The new features are listed below. New layout. The new notice contains a much larger font for the words "Notice of Public Hearing." In addition, the words Notice of Public Hearing will be located next to the return address on the outside of the notice. The vicinity map is located in a box in the center of the notice. Bright color. Staff recommends that the notice be printed on bright paper that will over time automatically trigger a response in'people's minds that this is an important item that has been sent to them from the City of Temecula. Standard Criteria for Exhibit for Vicinity map. Staff has prepared standard criteria for the Vicinity map for the notice (see Attachment No. 6). The vicinity map will clearly call out the main streets in the area. In addition, the site will be shaded, with the word "site" in large print and an arrow showing the location of the site. New Sign. A new design for the sign that used for posting the site has been explored as another way of increasing the visibility for projects. Staff recommends that the sign continue to be the same size as previous used (4' high x 4' wide) and the same bright yellow color. The top of the sign should include in bold letters what is being proposed. This information should be in plain language and brief in its description (i.e., PROPOSED CHURCH or PROPOSED SHOPPING CENTER). This information should be visible to motorists while in their cars. Below this would be the words "Notice of Public Hearing." Also needed on the sign should be the City Seal, notice information, the City's address and phone number and a directional map to City Hall. Staff is requesting direction as to the type of sign that the Commission would prefer to see posted on the site. Typical costs and prototype signs for new signs have obtained from a sign company and are included as Attachment No.. 7. A $45.00 charge is cur.rently levied by the sign company that is under contract with the City to post sites. Posting of Site Upon Application Submittal. In addition to posting the site for a Notice of Public Hearing, the site may also be posted upon submittal of an application. The anticipated benefit from posting the site early in the process is that the adjacent property owners will be afforded additional notification and time to respond to the project before it goes to public hearing. A shortcoming of this is that the posting of R:\STAFFRPT\NOPH.PC 3/15/94 k[b 3 the site for application submittal will be more costly that posting the site for the Public Hearing. Additional Exposure in the Newspaper. The Californian was contacted to determine how and whether additional coverage may be provided for the Public Hearing items within the City of Temecula. Staff inquired into the possibility of including hearing information in the front page index: The spokesperson for the Californian is still in the process of determining if this is possible. A synopsis of the meeting agendas can be placed in the Government Meeting Section of The Californian if specific newspaper deadlines are met (Reference Attachment No. 8). Minimum Number of Residents to be Noticed. In some instances, the number of affected property owners within a 300 foot or 600 foot radius from a given project is a very small number (i.e., between 5-10 separate property owners). Some municipalities have a minimum number of property owners (approximately 30) to be notified. This will assure that a satisfactory number of affected property owners will be notified of projects in their area. Attachments: 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Required Property Owners Notification Information - Blue Page 5 Property Owners Certification - Blue Page 6 Standard Exhibit for Radius Package - Blue Page 7 Current Notice of Public Hearing - Blue Page 8 Revised Notice of Public Hearing - Blue Page 9 Standard Vicinity Map for Notice of Public Hearing - Blue Page 10 Costs for Types of Noticing Signs and Prototype Signs- Blue Page I 1 Example of Government Meeting Section of The Californian - Blue Page 12 R:\STAFFRPT\NOPH,PC 3/15/9~ ktb 4 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 REQUIRED PROPERTY OWNERS NOTIFICATION INFORMATION R:\STAFFRPT\NOPH.PC 3/15/9A kLb 5 REQUIR~n PROPERTY OWNERS NOTIFICATION INFORMATION The following items will be requixed at the time of filing of the above noted case application: TWO identical packages to be inserted in separate 9 1/2" x 12 1/2" manila envelopes. These envelopes shall indicate the case number and the word "labels," and shall contain the following: be One typed set of g.mmed labels indicating all the property owners' names and the mailing addresses thai ax~ within a 600-foot radius of the exterior of the proposed project (this list shall be ascermlned from the last eqnaliTed assessment roll). For Projects under 10,000 Squal~ feet in Si7.1~ ~ re~lni-r~g a planning Director's Hearing, a 300-foot radius package is needed A photocopy of the aforcmcntionecl labels. One label for the r~presentative andTot engineer. One label for the owner. Four typed sets of gummed labels of the owner, engineer, and representative with theix mailing addresses. Do not include duplicate sets where representative and owner, etc., axe the same. These should be inserted in a letter-sized envelope and stapled to the outside of one of the laxge manila envelopes mentioned in item 1 above. Certification by the title company, engineer, or surveyor that the above list is complete and accurate. The Tax Assessor' s Office will not prepare or certify the property owner list (see certification form attached). On a copy of your exhibit or tentative map show all parcels within 600/300 feet. On the map, print the names of all property owners within 600/300 feet as they are listed on the gummed labels. C Y OF TEMECULA PLANNING DEPARTMENT A3'rACHMENT NO. 2 PROPERTY OWNERS CERTIFICATION R:\STAFFRPT\MOPH.PC 3/15/94 k~b 6 PROPERTY OWNERS c~/~'ri~ICATION I, , cenif-'y that on , the attached (Print Name) (month-day-year) property owners list was Flzpax~t by (Print ~ompany or individual's ~*~e) pur~mnt tO at~plication requirements furnished by the Cky of Tcmccul~ plnnning Dcparllncnt. Said list is a complete and true compilation of owner of the subject property and all other property owners within 600/300 feet of the property involved in the application and is based upon the latest eq,,=li?,,H assessment rolls. I further certify that the information fled is true and correct tO the best of my knowledge. I understand that incon'ea or erroneous informalion my be grounds for rejection or deninl of the application. NAMB: TITr-~YREGISTRATION: ADDRESS: PHONE: (8 a.m. - 5 p.m.) SIGNATURE: DATE: CASE NO.: C. Y OF TEMECULA PLANNING DEPARTMENT ATTACHMENT NO. 3 STANDARD EXHIBIT FOR RADIUS PACKAGE R:\STAFFRPT\NOPH,PC 3/15/f~ ktb 7 ~1. I P ..~MIVIm-I~I I ,J ~( DIU c' A'i'i'ACHMENT NO. 4 CURRENT NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING R:\STAFFRPT\NOPH.PC 3/15/94 ktb 8 Notice of Public Henririo ~ CITY OF TEh~CUI~ 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 A PUBLIC FrgARING has been scheduled before the PLANNING COMMISSION to consider the ma~ter(s) described below. Case No: Applicant: Location: Proposal: Environmental Action: Planner: Case No: Applicant: Location: Proposal: Environmental Action: Planner: Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before the hearing(s) or may appear and be heard in support of or opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing(s) described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission at, or prior to, the public hearing(s). The proposed project application(s) may be viewed at the public information counter, Temecula planning Department, 43174 Business Park Drive, Monday through Friday from 9:00 AM until 4:00 PM. Questions concerning the project(s) may be addressed to the case planner at the City of Temecula pDnning Department, (909) 694- 6400. 7he time, place and date of the hearing(s) are as follows: PLACE OF HEARING: DATE OF FrRARING: TIME OF HEARENG: Vail Elementary School 29915 Mira Loma Drive Temecula, CA ,1994 6:00 p.m. ATTACHMENT NO. 5 REVISED NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING R:\STAFFRPT\NOPH,PC 3/15/9~ ktb 9 Public Hearing A PUBLIC TW. ARTNG has been scheduled before the CH'Y OF ~ COM1V~ON to consider the matter described below: Case No: Applicant: Location: Proposal: PIANNING Environmental Action: Planner:. Recommendation: Vicinity Map SEE ATTACHMENT NO. 6 PLACE OF tr!?.ARING: DATE OF wg. ARING: TIME OF nT. ARING: Any person may submit wril2n comm~'uts to the Pl---i-g Commission befot= the hearing(s) or may appear and b~ heard in aupport of or opposition to the aptxroval of the Foject(s) at the time of hearing. If you ehagenge any of the projeax in court, you may be limiXed w raising only those issues you or someone dse mixed at the public hearing(s) describd in this riotier, or in written correspottdettce _d_~_llvered to the Phtttttiltg COttttltiSSlO' lg at, or/w/or to, the pub//c henzing(s). The lm0posect project appllc~ion(s) may be viewed a~ the public information courttar, Temecula Planning Depamnent 43174 Busine~ Park Drive, Monday through Fziday from 9:00 AM until 4:00 PM. Questions conc~ning the project(s) may be addressed to at the Qty of Temenla P' :ug Department, (909) 694-6400. CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING DEPARTMENT 43 174 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE TEMECUI~, CA 91590 NOTICE OF PUBLIC }tF, ARING ATTACHMENT NO. 6 STANDARD VICINITY MAP FOR NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING R:\STAFFRPT\NOPH,PC 3/15/94 ktb 10 /.PROJECT AREA SHADED BOLD WORD ~ SITE . "AND ARROW NORTH' ARROW MAJOR .,,r~""~ · IDENTIFIED ATTACHMENT NO. 7 COSTS FOR TYPES OF NOTICING SIGNS AND PROTOTYPE SIGNS R:\STAFFRPT\NOPH.PC 3/15/9~ kLb 11 ATTAr?NO .:'=. 7: i=~= ' === ~: =:.'-~=: .': ~i7:: =: :!!:=ii,COSTSi,FOR~:,~~:OF:'NOTICINGSIGNS ;5:: ,:. = SIGN TYPE SINGI,I~, CASE COST ANNUAL COST SEMI- PERMANENT SIGN $150.00 Material & construction 50.00 planning Coilllnission posting 50.00 City Council posting (if necessary) 100 Signs 100 Signs 30 Signs appmx. PER MEETING POSTING $ 50.00 Planning Commission posting 50.00 City Council posting (if necessary) 10 Signs # .100 Signs 30 Signs appmx. PER MEETING POSTING (Meeting Date Posted in large letters) $ 50.00 Planning Commission posting 12.00 @ Large lettering for meeting date 50.00 City Council posting (if necessary) 12.00 @ Large lettering for meeting date 'sumes replacement rote of ten signs/year (may be less) 10 Signs # 100 Signs 30 Signs approx. $15,t300.00 5,000.00 1.500.00 $21,500.00 $1,500.00 5,000.00 1.500.00 $8,000.00 $ 1,500.00 5,000.00 1,200.00 1,500.00 1.200.00 $10,400.00 R:~PLANNING~SIGNS. CHT 3/1~19~ sdl SEMI-PERMANENT SIGN PlaOPOSED USE: 200,000 sf ¢emm. Hater. Zome Clanale: kids lUll diaI, te I:emmerct ll PublicHear'ing Notice 'CITY OF TErlECULA For inlorn~etion contact: Temecule Plannlng Deportment 43174 au=ine~ Part Drive Ternecele, r'A 92591 (g0g) 694-6400 a. Sign goes up at time of application. b. Planning Commission Meeting notice posted. c. City Council Meeting notice posted (if required). d. Sign removed after final action. SIGN COST Single Case Cost $150.00 Matedal &construction 1 O0 Signs 50.00 Planning Commission posting 100 Signs 50.00 City Council posting (if necessary)30 Signs (approx.) $250.00 Annual Cost $15,000.00 5,000.00 1.500.00 $21,500.00 Advantages: - Constant public information during review process. Disadvantages: - Vandalism and maintenance. - Higher costs to applicants. - Sign clutter around city. - Posting of hearing notices would largely go unnoticed. PER MEETING POSTING PROI~SED US~- 2GO,gO0 ~ c~m-~. c4mter. Zone Clam/e: Rtdde mtl81 kI. te CemmrctBI /- PUbliC Hearing Notice CITY OF TErlECULA For information contact: Tamecain Plenntng Departrenal 43 174 OuelnesG Part Drive Tamecain, CA 92591 (g0g) 694-6400 ae Sign goes up pdor to Planning Commission meeting, Planning Commission hearing notice posted. Sign removed after Planning Commission meeting. Sign goes up pdor to City Council meeting, City Council hearing notice posted (if necessary). d. Sign removed after final action. SIGN COST Single Case Cost* 10 Signs# 50.00 Planning Commission posting 100 Signs 50.00 City Council posting (if necessary)30 Signs (approx.) $100.00 Annual Cost $1,500.00 5,000.00 1.500.00 $8,000.00 *re-usable signs #Assumes replacement rate of ten signs/year (may be less). Advantages: - 'Up' time is reduced, minimizing potential for vandalism and sign clutter. - Signs are recycled, reducing costs to applicants. - Placement of sign structure catches attention easier than posting of notice on existing sign. Disadvantages: - Shorter overall window of time for public noticing. PER MEETING POSTING PgOPl!S[O USE: 2OO,OOO ,f serum. eater. bee CMalr.. Ilelliemllel-kl. te Cemmercill Public Hearing Notice CITY OF TEI'IECULA Citg Council fleeting, Feb, 8. 1994 For Information contact: Timecull Planning Department 43174 Business Perk Drive Terneculo, Ca 92591 694-6400 Sign goes up prior to Planning Commission meeting, Planning Commission hearing notice posted. b. Sign removed after Planning Commission meeting. Sign goes up prior to City Council meeting, City Council hearing notice posted (if necessary). d. Sign 'removed after final action. SIGN COST Single Case Cost* Annual Cost 10 Signs# $1,500.00 50.00 Planning Commission posting 100 Signs 5,000.00 12.00 @ Large lettering for meeting date 1,200.00 50.00 City Council posting (if necessary)30 Signs (approx.)1,500.00 12.00 @ Large lettering for meeting date 1 ;200.00 $124.00 $10,400.00 *re-usable signs #Assumes replacement rate @ option of ten signs/year (may be less). Advantages: - "Up' time is reduced, minimizing potential for vandalism and sign clutter. - Signs are recycled, reducing costs to applicants. - Placement of sign structure catches attention easier than posting of notice on existing sign. Disadvantages: - Shorter overall window of time for public noticing. ATTACHMENT NO. 8 EXAMPLE OF GOVERNMENT MEETING SECTION OF THE CALIFORNIAN R:\STAFFRPT\NOPH.PC ~/15/9~ ktb 12 A'l'lf .Z,H.M.E.N'I' P' j, B : - ally Upper, vice president "' ' ....... ' Upper made his commen~ dents at Unfleld School during a visit Tues- ' day, The students were treated to an exptana- STEVETHORNTONI~CaUforrm~ tlon of fire ~g:trUngtechniques as well as safety tips about what to do during a fire. iders anima! rescue policy and other --im al abel- Duesday, county adm/nis- '- officer Harry Phipps re- I that veteran Animal fi Chief ErnmeCt Gibson L.: s'~ffcombined with con- :': citizens to save all an/- ,. pssible during the recent ivate proper~yneed- "~e entered, i~ was,' said ~'.'- ~.. 'A no~ce was left for ~: net ~tatin~that their an- · ":d bean removed, )' they could be picked "on said rescue efforts ' hindered by the lack of ~- ch Permit' process -- a . ' ~ to be considered by the ::: Task Force for Domestic Breeding. In an emergency, a Ranch- Permit procured beforehand could be posted on a gate or fence, authorizing animal con- ~rol staff to enter the property as needed to rescue =nirnMs. Phipps, however, questioned the counters liabiZ/ty for ani- mals that may perish despite proper posting,and Gibson maintained that any disaster rescue plan should be flex/ble enough to allow his crew to deal with a ~hn-ging sin/at'ion Gibson did support mendAug the countT~s .n~rnal shelter con- tracts to provide for emergency situations, bn= aC some addi- tional cost. Supervisors cited their desir-' es to have shelters hold rescued ~*-a~s. for longer time periods :-- the California Parks .'.' ldlLfe Bond Act of 1994 :~ :oes to voters in June.' ;' pointed a task force to 'Z o cat population control :. :g a cat I/tensing pro- : ~he 1st District will be ~ ~ted by M/chelle Sheehe · D.iscrict byAnne Wash- .' ~roved the s/zfi change .- r l~e Mission Trail road : g pro~ecC in Lake l~.Lsin- ne board approved -~ 3 for M:BC Contractors ~ ~, rebuz7 ~nd pack ~- r e~is~/ng sewer ~ ~fission Trail fol- ; =~sidence pro. blems. , Change orders for the projec~ now total $178~80 or 8.23 per- cent of the orig~nnl project cost. [ Approved a memorandum of understanding between the Flood Conn-ol DisCr/ct and U.8. Army Corps oI Engineers re- gardring emergent7 response to potential lake flooding at Lake Eleinore the. year. [] Reappointed Joseph Phelps of Temecula to the District 7 Flood Control and Water Con- setration Com,~-sion. Phelps has sez~red on the comm~-sion for three yea_~ and will now serve to Oct. 31, 1996. _ Compiled Dy Chuck Harry/ so that the rightful' owners could have a better chance to cl.lm them~ Also, the board agreed that animals should be transported and held as near as possible to their points of res- cue. In the Winchester and Orte;a area ~res, most county-rescued animals were taken either to the Lake Elsinore Animal Friends Shelter, 29001 Bascron St., or Rhlnona A~imal Haven at 690 Hnr--ne Way in San Ja- cinto. Dozens more were saved by the ex~ensive rescue efforts of volunteer residents -- such as Debra John-on of Winches- ter, who used her own horse trailer to relocate and find tsm- po.rary boarding for several horses left homeless by fire. [] gOVERNME3JTMEETING J WTldomar Municipal Advisory Council WILDOMAR --The town Munici- pal AdvisoP/Council will meet at 7 p.m. today in the Wildomar Be- mer~ary Sct~ool, 2:L575 Palomar St. The agenda includes: [] County Supervisor Bob Busl:- er's reOort on a possible regional park in Wildomar. II Posting of Wildomar bound- arysigns. [] Establish liaison with county Planning Commission. I~1 Rood corm'ol planning com- mittee. [] Discuss s~an-uO of Neigl~Dor- hood Watch 13togram. r~ Joint Powers Commission for Marc~ Air Force 9ase. based on 'what appears a double-edged sword: the $32.2 mill;on increase is predicated on MSJC increasing itS per- class unit fee from $13 to $20 and taking back abbut $15 miI- lion by defunding students with bachelors degrees. Murrieta for morn A, LEE GRAHAM I ~ Cc~fornm M'LrP,3.IETA -- For the sec- ond time in two months, resi- dents are going to bat for a Murrieta woman suffering from a debilitating blood diseas~ This time they actually w~ll swing softball b~tS 'for Ma~orie Win~, whose battle with aplas- tic anemia made headlines in December and ushered in a flood of community support, "Everyone was so helpful, it was just unbelievable," said Pebble McCabe, who helped or- ganize the December fund'rais- ing campaign, Tn~ to community gener- osity, the effort netted holiday toys and clothing for the W'mn f~ily as well as $2,300 for a fmrnily tZllst fllnd at First Pacif- ic Bnnl~ on W'mchester Rosa Now, McCabe hopes for even more community outread~ The Murrieta Parks and Rec- reation Com-,~,qsion last week approved a two-day so~ball tournament forthe Wi~ calxse. The coed, double-ellm~ntion event is set for Feb. 5 and 6 at California Oaks Sports Park Area businesses atrsady have donated items for a game-relat- ed silent auction Money made from concession sales also will benefit the Winns, McCabe said. Organizers hope for 18 ATTACHMENT NO. 2 NOTICING SIGN EXHIBITS R:\STAFFRPT\NOPH-2.CC 3/30/94 ktb 4 Sign for Posting Notice of Public Hearing Proposed Use' · SHOPPING CENTER Public Hearing Notice NOPH Flyer CITY OF TEMECU LA For information contact: Temecula Planning Department 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 (909) 694-6400 :Notic, 2 Sign for Posting Notice of Public Hearing with Hearing Date Proposed Use: SHOPPING CENTER Public Hearing Notice City Council Hearing: April 5, 1994 Seal NOPH Flyer CITY OF TEMECULA For information contact: Temecula Planning Department 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 (909) 694-6400 3ign for Posting Notice of Public Hearing Proposed Use: SHOPPING CENTER Public Hearing Notice NOPH Flyer CITY OF TEMECULA For information contact: Temecula Planning Department 43174 Business 'Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 ~ _.,_, ( 909 ) 694-6400 &" --- Map to City Hall Sign for Posting Notice of Application Submittal Proposed Use: SHOPPING CENTER Notice of Application Submittal Application Information CITY OF TEMECULA For information contact: Temecula Planning Department 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 (909) 694-6400 ITEM 29 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: /i CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer April 26, 1994 Private Bus Benches in Public Right-of-Way RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council provide direction to Staff regarding the placing of benches in the public right-of-way. BACKGROUND: At the regular Public Traffic/Safety Commission meeting of January 28, 1993, the Commission agreed by consensus to support a Sunrise Rotary Club project to place forty (40) bus benches at existing bus stops on Ynez, Jefferson/Front, and Rancho California Road. The Rotary Club would sell advertising on the benches and use the profits to increase the funding of their local school scholarships and community projects. Subsequently, the Public Works Department issued an encroachment permit and the Rotary Club installed the benches. However, several benches were placed at locations that already had existing RTA benches and the difficulty in relocating them to new locations cause the following issues to surface for Council consideration. Establishment of guidelines and procedures for placing benches in the public right-of-way by organizations other than the Riverside Transit Agency (RTA). 2. The quantity of benches and their location. 3. Guidelines for permitting one organization over another to place such benches. 4. Coordination with RTA. 5. Relocation of duplicate benches at certain locations. Assumption of liability by the organization receiving permission to place such benches and time limits on monopoly by organization given the authority to place benches in the public right-of-way. r:\agdrpt\94\O426%busbenchlajp If the Council chooses, the Staff can prepare a formal policy addressing the above items and submit it for review at a subsequent meeting. FISCAL IMPACT: Approximately forty (40) hours of personnel time will be devoted to this project. Attachments: 1. Sunrise Rotary Report 2. Traffic Commission Minutes 1/28/93 3. Traffic Commission Letter r:\agdrpt%94%O426\busbenchlajp Project: lo build and Diace aDDro×imately 40 bus benches at RTD bus stoOs on the three major arteries in Temecula: Ynez, Jefferson/Front, & Rancho California Rd. these bus benches will have advertising on them. sold bv members of the club to businesses in the community, as a ta× deductable donation to our foundation, with Drnceeds from the oroJect returned to our community. The benches are rotated on ~ regular' Oasis so that advertisers are exposed to a variety of locations in the communltv. This DroJect will +it into two of RotarYts avenues of service: 1) Vocational Service? as it will reoulre the assistance of several vocations redresented in our club, such as: a) Attorney-to draw uD contracts for advertisers go sign. O> Sales- to organize a sales Drogram to sell the advertising? c> Engineering- to design the benches and arrange for their manufacture, d) AdvertiSing- to design advertising format for uniform Oesign to comOlv with City Sign Ordance/variance and arrange for painting of the signs, e) Insurance- to orotec~ advertisers and the Rotary club against liabilltv claims. 2) Communltv Service: a~To determine the most beneficial locations to place the benches to serve-the advertiser and the Dublic. b) to run the ongoing committee to move the benches (rotate) on a ouarterly/monthlv basis. ~oth o. these Avenues of Service will benefit +tom the oroJect as it is DroDoseo that: l) One-half of the Drofits from this pro.]act be used to increase our ~unOing o~ scnolarshlDs to loctl high school. continuation high school. and community colleOe oreduates and 2) one-half of the profits from the pro.]ec~ be used to fund our commt:nltv projects. le: Rotary Park? Community Recreation Center. Senior Center, vou'th sOorts Dragrams, etC, commlt~.ee should consist o$ memOers with the +oilowing resDonslbzll~v: ~na lrman ~ro.~ec~ Coord lnator ~Ign Criteria, Design & Palntinq Legal ano insurance ~contract w/advertisers) (:-. ......... - .... Sales · Pro.;ect facll iratoP (moving benches) issues for Consideration: Bench Design: ~I'D - ~lberglass seat and back on concrete legs-frame Hemet Ro~arV Club Benches: Plvwood seat & back on tube steel +rame-leg~ Commercial - 2"x'~" seats, plvwood back in aluminum frame on concrete Seg~-trame. On tne RTD and Commercial style bench, the back is removed and moved to tne next location (the advertlzlng rotates)? wheras on the Hemet kotarv Club bench, the entire bench is moved. Design considerations are time it takes to remove and install bench backs with added security of weight of bench vs ease in moving entire bench (by thieves as well). Location & Number of Benches: RTD has an established bus route in Temecula using several streets, but for ou~ ourDoses we need locations that will serve the greatest nunbet of peooie and have benefit to advertisers. Therefore it is recommended that only Ynez, Rancho California Rd. and Jef+erson-Front streets be used. Limiting benches to these streets will also make moving of the benches easier on a regular basis. City Aooroval Process: Sign Ordinance standard sign design: color, name, logo, address, phone. Permit Process City Staff, Planning Commission, City Council' ~'rlclng Considerations: host of building bench Cost of Sign Painting Standard fee per year mlus initial design ~ mainring Value to advertiser lax Deductable donation Contract: Fixed Location (extra cost vs rotating benchT) Rotating Bench F'rlce Liability Insurance (club to provide) blgn criteria Use of profit limited to scholarships and community projects Financial Impact: There will be a considerable cost associated with implementing this project, primarily in the purchase of the benches +tom a manufacturer or materials ourchased for the club to manufacture them as a club project. Additionaily, the cost o+ painting the advertisers sign onto the bench. ~ecause of the number of benches and prigping business for a sign comOany, we may be able to negotiate a +avorable rate. additionally, all or part of the initial sign painting may be charged to the advertiser when they first advertise. It is recommended that all malntalnce of the benches and of the advertising be the responsibility of the ~otarv Club. This will encourage advertisers to continue to advertise for multiple vear~. Fhere may be uofront costs for design and sign review by the City. Once the initial e:<~ense of ourchasing the benches and going through the permit ~rocess with the City and getting the benches painted, the program should enerate a significant ~profit' with which to fund our scholarships and community service projects as follows: 40 benches at ~300. each per year = ~12.0¢)0. gross. There is very little maintaince expense to these benches once thev are installed. Occasionally they may be vandalized with ~raffiti, or abused-broken which will reoulre constant inspection and repair. When the benches are moved, they can be cleaned bV the moving committee, or a company can be contracted to clean them on a regular basis. De~endin9 on the selection of bench design? the benches mav be stolen, ~hich reOu~res replacement so that the advertiser receives value ~or his donation-investment. Note: Rectangular can- opies are available for most park benches. (See page 15 J~r tiemils.) ,T~:L LEG )ur traditional Sted Leg park benches provide :ities and parks with the same solid durability and rtaintenance free beauty found in our fiberglass and teel combination tables. Wide seat and backrests ,rovide generous room for the weary user. l, lodei Length Seat lesttin Weight Finish (in.) (in.) (in Lbs.) 6PB 72 10 50 S W 7PB 84 12 55 StY8 % 12 65 s w 12PB 144 12 1oo S <)UBLE PEDESTAL ,ur traditional Double Pedestal park bench ofters a can look and a comfortable seat to the tired park sitor. Its pedestal legs make area clean-up around :e bench a snap. 12' length benches have a 3rd pedestal leg. Legs are either in-ground mg type or have leg plates for securemerit to >ncrete. (See page 26 for details.) Model tzngth Seaz Wid~ Weight finish (in.) (in.) (in Lbs.) 6PI~° 72 I0 48 ¢; w 7PII~ 8-t 12 53 S IlPBF % 12 63 S W 12PE, P 1,'4 12 98 S 7ONE LEG ~pular with city and park buyers due to its anti- ndal strength and durabi [i ty our traditional Stone park bench with its 4" cast molded, steel rein- reed concrete legs provide a urdt that neecls no choring... where you place this brute, is where it FIBERGLASS PARK BENCHES OurPark Benches learace filXTglaSS bac~ and seats with 1 ~ "squ~re steel cores on I~S '; 14 gauge galvanized steel flat feet with ground securement capabilities. Backs and benches are standard 12" widths, however 10" and 15" wide surfaces are also available on some models. Please inquire with factory. 12' length park benches have a 3rd center leg for all types. "t .:."",.:.'-, i i. ....... :-.:. .... - ....... '_,i BANK OF CC MERCE !R_ECEIVED'! .,~-..~i ,.Z' z' ,~. MARKHAM & ASSOCIATES' TEM~CULA. CA 923,'.K) January 19, 1993 Larry Markham 41750 Winchester Road, Ste N Temecula, CA 92590 RE: Rotary Bus Bench Project Dear Larry: Pursuant to our conversation, enclosed is a list of proposed bench locations. This list does not include all of the bus stops in Temecula orovided by RTA, on it's Route 23, but represents those most suitable 'or advertizing. We have asked RTA for permission to relocate it's ~xisting benches on Route 23 to those locations not provided by our project. I have'asked Tom Paradis to contact RTA for a letter expressing their position in favor of us taking on the responsibility of providing benches for the convenience of their customers. Tom will forward their correspondence to me within the next week or so. Ple&se call me if you have any questions. Sincerely, ~t v n D. Ahlquist e e First Vice President Manager 27280 JEFFERSON AVE., SUITE 100 · TEMECULA, CA 92590-5609 · TELEPHONE (714) 694-8566 · FAX (714) 694-1362 K II Winehamlet Hlght~ndi · Bumlilies Sen, in Downlown Temecula, Temecula Park'n'R;de Target, Palm ~L~za, To,vet Haze, Old Town, Heritage Mobi(e Home Park No service on weekends or on the following holidays: New Years Day. Memorial Day, Independence Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. Time Po~! . / Rouh: 23 Wemd:~o~nd Bu.s limb Rowe 23 Eas~:wmd Bus [] Tmm/'Tronsje~ Po;nl ~ Ink:ales AJmmmate Ro~:in9 I'W1 · ' Pelnt ~f Inlm~es&' .... Imjicam AJIttnai= Rm~ting (E) : Indicotes AJlernall Rou6n "; ;' when $chod is in mmssi~.tk~ Well Abrml~m ly Temeeull -. Plez. i E~mentary p,a~..f~~ Catitomi= Target ..._.- "" VIII Eletnermtary ecnoot 8a~1001 MarOaf~ta ' Home Pmk Palomit ~ VIibOrn Canlet ,, Areecho Vhlm Crmelcllde Apt& Old Town A Community Clr, · ./ Page68:: .~- .-: RIVERSIDETRANSIT AGENCY- ,. September 1992 >-.' Printed an IOO~ Reqded Pa#~ : : -: TEMECULA SUNRISE ROTARY BUS BENCH PROJECT PROPOSED BENCH LOCATIONS Through Street Rancho Calif Rd Ynez Margarita Front Front Front Front Front Jefferson Rancho Vista Rancho Vista Rancho Vista Rancho Vista Margarita Margarita Margari~a Margarita ,argarita Margarita 26040 Ynez Front Street Front Street Front Street County Center Drive Ynez Winchester Winchester Diaz Diaz Front 2nd Street Main Front Rancho Calif Rancho Calif Rancho Calif Ynez Ynez Ynez Ynez Ynez Ynez Ynez Rancho Calif Rancho Calif Cross Street Town Center Rancho Highlands Rancho Vista Rancho Calif Del Rio Del Rio Via Montezuma Via Montezuma Winchester Sports Park Sports Park Mira Loma Mira Loma Ave Barca Ave Barca Stone Wind Stone Wind Solana Solana Equity Drive Enterprise Cir S Ave Alvarado Dos Picos Rancho Calif Front Front Towne Center Car Wash Margarita Rancho Highlands Solana Mervyn's Koll Center Palm Plaza Mervyn's Entrance Toyota Margarita Moraga Plaza Description S Side/East Bound E Side at Duck Pond NE Corner At Chevron Station At McDonald's Restaurant SW Corner NE Corner SW Corner At Burger King South Side North Side North Side South Side NW Corner SW Corner NE Corner SW Corner At Apartments SW Corner At Bianchi At Old Adobe Del Taco At Walt Abraham Center At jefferson Med Center NE Corner SW Corner SW Corner SW Corner At Post Office N Side N Side Wherehouse West Side" NE Corner East Side SW Corner S Side S Side PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION JANUARY 28, 1993 Chairman Guerriero declared a recess at 8:00 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 8:10 P.M. Bus Bench Project Director Serlet presented the staff report. L:arry Markham', represe.nting the Sunrise Rotary Club, reported on the bus bench project being proposed, to build and place approximately 40 bus benches at RTD bus stops on the three major arteries in Temecula. The club proposes to sell advertising on the bus benches, which will be installed and maintained by the club members, and proceeds from advertising-sales will be returned to the community. Chairman Guerriero suggested that a shelter type bus bench be located at the senior center, The overall consensus of the Commission was in support of the Sunrise Rotary Club bus bench project. Western BYPass Corridor Alianment Study Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer, presented the staff report. Fred Weishaupl, representing NBS Lowry, 27450 Ynez Road, Temecula, the consulting firm hired to prepare the Western Bypass Corridor Alignment Study, presented an overview and discussed the alignment studies and diagrams of modified secondary highway section alternatives. It was moved by Commissioner Perry, seconded by Commissioner Sander to approve staff recommendation, recommending to the City Council the following Western Bypass Corridor Alignment Study recommendations: 1) Approve the Western Bypass Corridor alignment, as il!ustrated in Exhibit 7 of the Western Bypass Corridor Alignment Study report, dated December 1992 (Revised), as the Master Plan for this route and maintain its present classification of a four-lane divided arterial highway on the City of Temecula General Plan Circulation Element. 2) Approve the intersection design concept illustrated in Exhibit 3 of the report as the Master Plan for the Front Street' Intersection. 3) Approve the design concept of a grade separated interchange for the Rancho California Road intersection, as illustrated on Exhibit 4 of the report. PTSCOMMIN112BI93 -3- ' 2/5193 . x FEB I o., ..... >City of Temecula 4317~ Busine.~s P,3rk Drive · Temeculs. C~liforni~ 925~0 19091 69~-1989 · FAX 1909] 69~-1999 ~eb~a[y 8 ~ ~993 Mar. Larry Markham Markham. and Associates 41750 Winchester Road Temecula, CA 92590 RE: Sunrise Rotary Club Bus Bench Project Dear Mr. Markham: # Please advise the Sunrise Rotary Club' members that the City of Temecula Public/Traffic Safety Commission supports their involvement in the Community and is pleased to endorse the proposed bus bench project. Please extend to the club our appreciation for the interest the Sunrise Rotary Club has taken in this project. The City of Temecula Public/Traffic Safety Commission is certain that this project will be both successful for the Rotary Club and beneficial to the City of Temecula. Sincerely, Chairman Ron Guerriero. City of Temecula Public/Traffic Safety Commission 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA .92590 RG:gz co: Director of Public Works Tim Serlet City Council ITEM 30 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY ~~,. FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer April 26, 1994 Status Report on Winchester Interchange, Overland Bridge, Winchester/Nicolas Signalization, Right Turn Lane at Pala Road/Highway 79 South, and Margarita Road Widening North of Rancho California Road RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive and file the status report on Winchester Interchange, Overland Bridge, Winchester/Nicolas Signalization, Right-turn lane at Pala Road/Highway 79 South, and Margarita Road north of Rancho California Road. BACKGROUND: The following is a status report on the above mentioned projects. Winchester Interchanqe - Caltrans has completed their review of the plans and specifications and provided fourteen (14) pages of comments to our consultant. J.F. Davidson Associates anticipates re-submitti.ng the plans by the end of April, 1994. Caltrans has also completed their review of the Project Report and have requested a Level of Service Traffic Analysis for all main lane sections, intersections, ramps, merge, diverge, and weave sections. This additional effort will involve obtaining the necessary traffic count data and performing evaluations for various traffic conditions. The report will be re- submitted by April 21, 1994. The Structural Engineer has been notified to proceed with the widening' of the Santa Gertudis Bridge and is scheduled to submit the plan to Caltrans by the end of March, 1994. Relocation plans for sewer and water lines within portions of Palm Plaza that will be affected by the construction are being prepared and will be submitted to the respective utilities for approval. It is anticipated that the project will be advertised for construction in December, 1994. The current construction estimate is $7,775.240. The plans for the construction of the right-turn- lane on the south side of Winchester Road east of Jefferson Avenue have been reviewed by Caltrans and our consultant has addressed the comments and will re-submit the plans on April 22, 1994. r:\agdrpt%94\O426\winchester.updlajp II. Overland Overcrossing - The Project Report is being revised to reflect the Caltrans comments regarding the proposed alignment. The Structural Engineer has completed the Advanced Planning Report 'determining the type of bridge (cast-in-place pre-stressed concrete box girder) and submitted it to Caltrans. The pier and abutment locations are necessary to complete structural plans and their location will affect the limits of Caltrans right-of-way and configuration of the ACS parking lot. The plans and technical specifications are being revised to reflect the changes mandated by Caltrans during their initial review of the Project Report. The plans and specifications are 90% complete and will be re-submitted by the end of April, 1994. The current construction cost estimate is $12,020,727. III. Winchester/Nicolas Sianalization - The Traffic Signal Design was completed and submitted to Caltrans for their review on March 1, 1994. It is anticipated that Caltrans will return their first plan check comments within. six (6) weeks. Caltrans has requested additional information but has not returned the first check comments. IV. Riaht Turn Lane (EB to SB) at Pala Road/Hiahwav 79 South - Turning movement counts have been submitted to Caltrans for their review and preliminary design has been started. It is anticipated that the plans and technical specifications will be submitted to Caltrans by May 1, 1994. Trans Pacific Engineers of Temecula are the project designers. Marqarita Road Wideninc) - Staff is negotiating a Reimbursement Agreement with Kemper Real Estate Development Company to expedite the construction of full width improvements on the east side of Margarita Road. The City will provide a funding mechanism that will allow Kemper to construct the improvements prior to the time frames established through the Development Approval Process and reimburse the City for construction costs. The following items of concern will be addressed in the agreement. Agreement would provide for the completion of ultimate road improvements on the east side of Margarita Road from Rancho California Road northerly to La Serena Road. This is the frontage of the Temeku project. Kemper would construct the full street improvements to include curb, gutter, asphalt, base, sidewalk, roadway striping, public utilities and street lights as shown on approved improvements plans. Soils inspections and reports would also be provided. Kernper would obtain competitive bids for these improvements from at least three qualified contractors: Kernper, at its sole discretion, will award a contract to the lowest responsible bidder. 4. City encroachment fees, inspection fees, and utility deposits would initially be paid by Kernper and invoiced to the City for reimbursement at the end of the first month. Amount would however be included in surcharge. 5. The City of Temecula will reimburse Kemper for the full, actual cost of the improvements. Monthly payments will be made by the City to Kemper within 30 days after Kemper gives the City an invoice for the actual work accomplished each month. Kemper would then pay contractor(s). r:\agdrpt\94~O426\winchester.updlajp Kemper (or a succeeding owner of the Temeku project) would provide an agreement to pay to the City the total actual cost of the improvements (including fees and utility deposits) at the time the building permits are issued. The first 800 dwelling units would pay an additional fee, equal to the actual costs of the improvements (total reimbursement received by Kemper) divided by 800, at the time each dwelling unit permit is issued. This is an arbitrary number for calculation purposes and does not limit the actual number of units in the project. 7. The additional fee obligation would not be tied to the golf course property or occupancy of the clubhouse facility. 8. Prevailing wages may not be necessary due to the funding mechanism involving a loan. However, subdivision bonds will be necessary. Additionally, Rancho California Water District is currently designing a 20 inch steel water line that will serve the Temeku project and will be located in this reach of Margarita Road and La Serena Way. The District anticipates construction to occur in late or early spring. This proposed construction will delay the final paving course but will not prevent the installation of all other improvements or the use of the road with base course paving. r:~agdrpt~94\O426\winchester.updlajp ITEM 31 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY ~ FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning April 26, 1994 Status of Proposed Downsizing Ordinance PREPARED BY: John Meyer, Senior Planner RECOMMENDATION: It is requested that the City Council and Planning Commission: Receive and File this status report on the preparation of the proposed downsizing ordinance. BACKGROUND On February 22, 1994, staff received direction from the Council to prepare an ordinance to regulate the size of residential units in approved tracts. On March 7, 1994, staff presented a report to the Planning Commission to get its concerns and recommendations on the subject topic. Example ordinances from the Cities of Murrieta and Moreno Valley were also given to the Commission. COMMISSION DIRECTION Upon receiving input from staff and the general public, the Commission members provided staff the following comments: 1. Include criteria that considers the ratio of vacant lots to built lots. Consider reducing the average square footage of the homes in a tract, but not the minimum square footage. Be specific as possible when developing criteria for homes within a "transition area" between larger and smaller homes. 4. Consider a 10 to 15 percent limit on the reduction of homes sizes. 5. Require landscaping of the reduced home be identical to the built homes. 6. Get a clear legal opinion on the City's legal ability to regulate home sizes. R: \Staffrpt\downsizc. CCl It was the overall consensus of the Commission that the Murrieta Ordinance was favored over the Moreno Valley .Ordinance. CITY ATTORNEY The City Attorney has provided an opinion on the recent litigation involving the Moreno Valley Downsizing Ordinance. Staff has attached the attorney's opinion to this report for the Council's review. Briefly, the opinion indicates that a subsequent downsizing ordinance in the City of Temecula would not affect development that falls under an approved development agreement or vesting tentative map. This is significant because the majority of residential development in this community falls within approved specific plans with development agreements. In particular, the two projects, Chardonney Hills and Rancho Vista Estates, that brought the downsizing issue to light, fall under the same development agreement, PROCESS With the input received from the Commission, staff has begun to prepare a draft ordinance. Prior to bringing the draft ordinance back to the Commission, staff will present it to the Temecula Coordinating Committee and the local Building Industry Association chapter. FISCAL IMPACT Because this ordinance is being prepared in-hOuse, no expenditures of City funds is necessary. However, it is estimated this ordinance will require 28 staff hours to prepare at a cost of about 91000, not including the City Attorney's time. Attachment: 1, Status of Litigation on Moreno Valley Downsizing Ordinance Letter from Burke, Williams & Sorensen, April 1, 1994- Page 3 R: \Staffrpt\downs ize. CC 1 2 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 LETTER FROM BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSEN DATED APRIL 1, 1994 STATUS OF LITIGATION ON MORENO VALLEY DOWNSIZING ORDINANCE R:\Stsffrpt\downsize. CCl 3 981-3468 LAW OFFICES SUITE 640 COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA 92626 (714) 545-5559 CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNeY/CLIENT PRIVILEGE April 1, 1994 ° """"gECEIVED A.PR O 6 199z, Mr. Gary Thornhill Director of Planning City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, California 92590 Re: Status of Litigation on Moreno Valley Downsizing Ordinance Dear Gary: You have requested our office to determine the status of the recent' litigation involving the City of Moreno Valley's Downsizing Ordinance. At issue in the lawsuit was whether the downsizing ordinance applied to property subject to a development agreement. The development agreement gave the developer the right to build homes subject to the land use ordinances in effect at the time the agreement was approved. The city subsequently adopted a downsizing ordinance and tried to apply the ordinance to prevent the downsizing of the homes from the plans submitted. The development agreement included certain "discretionary rights" to be retained by the city. The city's position was that such discretionary rights in the development agreement gave it the right to restrict downsizing pursuant to the ordinance. The judge disagreed with the city's position and ordered the city to permit the developer to build the houses at the size he wanted to build. However, the judge also ruled that since the city's discretionary powers were involved, certain city immunities applied, and no damages were awarded against the city. We have been advised that Moreno Valley's downsizing ordinance is still in place and there are currently no direct challenges to its validity. Mr. Gary Thornhill April 1, 1994 Page 2 At this time, we do not know how the language of the development agreement involved in the Moreno Valley lawsuit compares to the development agreements used in Temecula. -. However, under the City's typical development agreement, the developer's rights vest according to the land use regulations existing at the time the agreement is effective with an exception for ordinances to protect the public "health and safety." In our opinion, it would be doubtful that a court would interpret the exception to permit a subsequently enacted downsizing ordinance to apply to those projects involving preexisting development agreements. We hope the foregoing information is useful to you. If you have any questions in this matter or if we may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact us. Very truly yours, cc: Scott F. Field, City Attorney John Meyer, Senior Planner do~nsi ze. LTR ITEM 32 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works\City Engineer April 26, 1994 Owl Rock Products, Wilson Creek Mine Owl Rock Sand and Gravel Surface Mining Operation in the Aguanga Area PREPARED BY: rLY"Raymond A. Casey, Principal Engineer - Land Development RECOMMENDATION: Receive and File. BACKGROUND: Surface Mining Permit No. 185 was scheduled as Public Hearing Item Number 6.0 of the April 13, 1994, Riverside County Planning Commission Agenda. As directed by the City Council, a staff member from the Department of Public Works artended the hearing and entered City of Temecula City Council's Minute Action from the April 5, 1994, hearing into the record. In addition, this staff member pointed out the following deficiency in the Environmental Impact Report (EIR). The Circulation Element of the EIR identifies the sub-standard truck turning radii at Interstate 15 and Highway 79 ramps, however no mitigation measures have been identified. After taking testimony, the Planning Commissioners unanimously denied the project. Staff feels there is a reasonable likelihood the applicant will appeal the decision to the Board of Supervisors. Staff will monitor the appeal process and inform the Council of any proposed County action. FISCAL IMPACT: None. -1 - r:\agdrpt%94%O426~owlrock.ll/ajp DEPARTMENTAL 'REPORTS CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT APPROVAL: TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Council/City Manager Anthony Elmo, Chief Building Official April 26, 1994 Building and Safety March 1994, Activity Report RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. DISCUSSION: The following is a summary of activity for March 1994: Building Permits Issued ............................................. 238 Building Valuation ......................................... ~ 13,514,471 Revenue Collected ............. ~ ........................... 9127,245.50 Housing Starts ................................................... 127 New Commercial Starts ................................ 2 = 41,446 Sq. Ft. Commercial Additions/Alterations ......................... 10 = 18,481 Sq. Ft. Building Inspections ............................................. 2,237 V:~TONY~REPORTS~MARCH94.RPT Agenda Repo~ April 26,1994 Page 2 Code Enforcement Actions .......................................... 330 Active Cases Pending .............................................. 278 Closed Cases .................................................... 47 V:~,TONY'~REPORTS%MARCH94.RFT APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY ~/ FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER TO.' FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning~ April 26, 1994 Monthly Report RECOMMENDATION: Receive and File Discussion: Caseload A;:tivitv: The following is a summary of the Planning Department's caseload and project activity for the month of March 1994: The Department received 5 applications for administrative cases and 8 for public hearing cases for the month of March as follows: Development Agreement 1 Minor Public Use Permit 1 Plot Plan (subject to CEQA) 1 Plot Plan (with CEQA) 1 Revised Permit 3 Specific Plan Land Use I Total 8 Ongoing Projects: Old Town Soecific Plan: Staff is working on the initial implementation measures identified in the plan. A request for proposal was distributed to regional planning and landscape architecture firms. For street scape improvements on April 15, 1994, we received three proposals. Old Town Redevelooment Project: Staff continues to meet with Zev Buffman to identify the scope, scale and approval mechanism for the project. Develooment Code: Staff has received a revised draft Development Code and is scheduling the industrial area workshops and the final Development Code Advisory committee meeting. R:~MONTHLY.RPT~1994~FEB 4118/94 vow 1 French Valley Airoort: The City Council and Planning Commission reviewed the ALUC's preferred alternatives on April 17, 1994. Water Efficient Landscaoe Ordinance The Draft Ordinance is scheduled for the April 26th City Council meeting. Temecula ReQional Center Specific Plan and Environmental Imoact Reoort: This Specific Plan was presented at a Planning Commission hearing on May 4, 1992 where the Commissioners gave direction to the applicant and staff. The Specific Plan was scheduled for a Planning Commission Hearing on March 21, 1994 for direction and was continued to May 23, 1994. Environmental Impact Report 340 prepared for the Temecula Regional Center was approved by the Planning Commission on June 21, 1993 and certified by the City Council on July 13, 1993. Winchester Hills and Camoos Verdes Soecific Plans and Environmental Imoact Reoorts: These Specific Plans were discussed at a Planning Commission Workshop on May 4, 1992 where the Commissioners gave direction to the applicant and staff. The Notice of Completion for the Campos Verdes EIR went to State Clearinghouse July 10, 1992. BotCh of these Specific Plans went to the DRC meetings on January 5, 1993. Campos Verdes Specific Plan was scheduled for a March 21,1994 Planning Commission Hearing for direction and was continued to May 23, 1994. Murdy Ranch Soecific Plan and Environmental Imoact Reoort: This Specific Plan was presented to the Planning Commission at a Workshop on April 6, 1992. The Commission provided Staff and the applicant direction relative to design issues. The applicant has incorporated these changes into the Specific Plan. This Specific Plan will be scheduled for a Planning Commission meeting upon completion of the Development Agreement and the Congestion Management Plan. An addendum to the EIR is currently being reviewed by staff. Johnson Ranch Soecific Plan: The Specific Plan has been to a Development Review Committee meeting and is currently being amended to incorporate staff's comments. The EIR has been submitted and is being reviewed by staff. Attachments: 1. Revenue and Status Report - page 3 R:~MONTHLY.RPT',1994~FEB 4/18/94 vgw 2 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 REVENUE STATUS REPORT R:\MONTHLY.RFT~1994~,FEB 4118/94 vgw 3 REVP~? O4 001 161 ACCOUNT 4101 4102 4103 4104 4105 4106 4107 4108 4109 4110 4111 4112 4113 4114 4115 4116 4117 4118 4119 4120 412 412. 41~ 4124 4125 4126 4127 4128 4129 4130 4131 413Z 4133 4134 4135 413~ 4137 4138 4139 4140 4141 4142 4143 4144 4145 4146 10:43:24 GENERAL FUND PLANNING DESCRIPTION AMENDED FINAL NAP APPEALS CERT. OF LAND D[V. CCl4PLIANCE EXTENSION OF TIE SINGLE FAH]LY TRACTS MULTI-FAMILY TRACTS PARCEL NAPS LOT LiNE ADJUSTREfiT HIMON CHANGE PARCEL RERGER (2'4 LOTS) RECORDABLE SlJBOIVISION NAPS REVERSION TO ACREAGE (5+LOTS) SPECIAL SERVICE LETTER SECOND UNIT PERMITS CHANGE OF ZONE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CONSISTENCY CHECKS GENERAL PLAN AMENDRENT PLOT PLAN PUBLIC USE PERMIT REVISED PERMIT SETBACK ADJUSTIqENT SPECIFIC PLAN SUBSTANTIAL CONFORNANCE TEHORARY OUTDC)CXt EVENT TEMPORARY USE PERMIT VARIANCE ZONING INFORMATION LETTER CEQA (INITIAL STUDIES) CEQA ENV[RONENT IMPACT REPORT DEVELOPMENT AGREEHENT GEOLOGY CEQA GEOLOGY ORD, 547 APZ' LAFCO PARCEL HAP/I/A]VER MERGER AMENDED FINAL TRACT/PAR, NAP CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION CONDO TRACT NAP REVERSION TO ACREAGE LOT REVISION AFTER CHECK LOT LINE ADJUST. PLAN CHECK CERT, OF CORRECT. PLAN CHECK CERT. OF COMPLIANCE PLAN CHECK COND, CERT, OF CONPL, PLN, CK, CERT, OF PAR, MERGER PLAN CK CITY OF TBIECULA REVENUE STATUS REPORT MARCH 199~ ADJUSTED ESTIMATE .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00. .00 .00 .00 150,000.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 HARCH REVENUE .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 274.00 .OO .00 .00 .00 .OO .00 .00 .00 590.00 .00 .00 6, 178.00 .00 1,180. O0 .00 29,5~5.00 185.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 1,166.00 .00 4,OOO.OO .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 1993-9~ REVENUE .OO 975.00 1,072,13- 2,5T/'.00 18,666.00 .00 6,255,29 2,500.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 260.00 6,715.75 10,575.00 .00 .00 8,4.66.75 3,707.00 1,453.00 500,00 29,525.00 4,174.00 582.00 .00 571.00 18.00 5,629.71 10,402.00 4,000.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 PAGE .00 975.00- 1,07'2.13 2,57'/'.00- 18,466.00- .00 6,255.29- 2,500.00- .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 4,715.75- 10,575.00- .00 .00 141,533.25 3,707.00- 1,453.00- 500.00- 29,525.00- 4,174.00- 582.00- .00 571.00- 18.00- 5,629.71 - 10,402.00- 4,000.00- .IX) .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ..XCOC 5,6 REVPR[N:; Q~/07/c~ 001 161 ACCOUNT iV 6147 4148 4149 4150 4151 4152 4153 4154 4155 4156 4157 4169 4180 4226 4260 4261 4~69 10:~):24 GENERAL FUND PLANNING DESCRIPTION VACATIONS PLAN CK D_n~__qqENT PROCESSING CONDEHNATION PLAN CHECK REVERSION TO ACRE. PLAN CHECK PARCEL MAP PLAN CHECK TRACT HAP PLAN CHECK ANENDED HAP PLAN CHECK 4TH & SUBS, SUgl4]TTALS FEHA STUDY REVIEU LOMA REV]EU DRAINAGE STUDY REVIEU IMPROVE INSPECTION ON-SITE /-RAT STUDY FEES FAST TRACK PLANNING FORHA FAST TRACK IN HOUSE PLAN CHECKS ANNEXATION FEES TEMPORARY USE PERMIT ACCESSORY ~IND ENERGY LARGE FAHILY DAY CARE HAZARDOUS UASTE FACILITY LAND DIV UNIT MAP LANDSCAPE PLAN CHECK PLANNING CITY OF TENECtJLA REVENUE STATUS REPORT HARCH 1994 ADJUSTED ESTIHATE .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 o00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 150,000.00 HARCH REVENUE .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 1,140.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 1,975.00 &6,193.00 1993-9/, REVENUE .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 5,000.00 .00 4,620.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 561.00 9,945.00 1~,~06.~7 ~ 2 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .O0 5,000.00- .00 6,420.00- .00 .00 .00 .0 561.00- *** 9,945.00- *"'* ~.15,793.6.$ 89.5 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL CITY ATFORNEY CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer April 26~ 1994 Public Works Monthly Activity Report RECOMMENDATION: Attached for City Council's review and filing is the Department of Public Works' Monthly Activity Reports for March, 1994. \agdrpt%O222%moactrpt CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS Monthly Activity Report APRIL, 1994 Submitted by: Tim D. Serlet Prepared by: Don Spagnolo Date: April 15, 1994 I. WORK UNDER CONSTRUCTION: 1. CRC: All work is complete except some minor punch list items. 2. Riverton Park: The 120-day maintenance period began on December 30, 1993. Maintenance of the newly landscaped planter and turf areas is ongoing and consists of scheduled fertilizing and weeding of the areas as necessary. It is anticipated that the contractor will have complied with the maintenance period requirements by the scheduled completion date of April 29, 1994. The City will accept the park site improvements at a dedication ceremony on May 19, 1994. 3. Pala CommuniW Park: During the initial rough grading operations, the contractor discovered that the site was unable to support construction equipment.. The bearing capacity of the soil has been reduced by an unusually high groundwater table. The contractor tested the feasibility of dewatering the park site so it can support construction equipment and it has been determined that the site can be dewatered. Because of the costs involved in dewatering the entire park site, construction of the ultimate improvements will be phased. The plans are being revised to reflect the proposed phasing, and the contractor is expected to begin construction in early May. 4. Pujol Street Imorovements: The project is 100% complete and a recommendation for acceptance may proceed to City Council on May 10, 1994. 5. MarcJarita Road Sidewalk Improvements: The project is 100% complete and a recommendation for acceptance will be on the City Council Agenda of April 26, 1994. 6. Sports Park Slope Repair: A construction contract was awarded to American Contracting, Inc. on March 8, 1994. The contractor was issued the notice to proceed on April 11, 1994. The City pwO4~moectrpt\cip~94\April 04113/94 Monthly Activity Report Aptfl, 1994 Page 2 is currently working with M.W.D. to ensure that the San Diego Pipelines No. I and 2, which run through portions of the project, are protected during construction. The project is expected to be completed by the beginning of June, 1994. The contract includes the reconstruction of a portion of the slope below Margarita Road, the installation of an irrigation system and landscaping on the reconstructed slope, and the reconstruction of a portion of the earthen channel meandering through the park. 7. Lon~j Valley Wash Channel: Informal bids were received April 4, 1994 and the low bid was received from Monteleone Excavation. A construction contract' is expected to be awarded during the April 26, 1994 T.C.S.D. Board Meeting. Construction is expected to begin in the beginning of May, 1994 and be completed by the beginning of June, 1994. The project consists of the removal of sediment from several desiliting basins and portions of the channel flowline, the reconstruction of portions of the channel's flowline and banks, and the rehabilitation of a rip-rap drop structures. I1. PROJECTS BEING BID: 1. Solana Way Street Improvements: The bids were opened on January 20, 1994 and once the CFD 88-12 reimbursement agreements are finalized by the adjacent owners, staff will recommend to City Council to award the project to Yeager Construction, the apparent lowest bidder. 2. Ynez Road Landscape Imorovements: Public bids will be opened on Thursday, the 28th day of April, 1994. schedule to start in early summer. III. WORK IN DESIGN Construction is 1. Winchester Road Interim Ramp Improvements: The second plan check comments for t!~e plans and specification for Project No. PW 94-03 have been returned to the engineer. The revised plans and specification should be returned to the City for the final plan check on April 13, 1994. 2. Winchester Road Loop: The consultant has submitted the revised Project Report to Caltrans and the plans pwO4\moectrpt~cip~94\April O4/13/94 Monthly Activity Report Ap~Yl, 1994 Page 3 were submitted to Caltrans on December 27 for their review. 3. Kent Hintergardt Memorial Park: Final plan check comments on the plans and specifications for the concession stand and rest room facilities at Kent Hindergardt Memorial Park, Project No. PW94-01CSD, have been addressed. Solicitation of bids is expected to take place in the beginning of May, 1994. A construction contract is expected to be awarded in the beginning of June, 1994 and construction is expected to begin in the beginning of July, 1994. 4. Loma Linda Park - I1: Final plan check comments on the plans and specifications for the improvements to Loma Linda Park - Phase II, Project No. PW94-O2CSD, have been addressed. Solicitation of bids is expected to take place in the beginning of May, 1994. A construction contract is expected to be awarded in the beginning of June, 1994 and construction is expected to begin in the beginning of July, 1994. 5. Liefer Road, John Warner Road, and Santiago Road: The City has selected a consultant for each of the three road projects. The consultants were selected and ranked on qualifications. Staff has notified all participants of the results. The funding method of the above road projects is scheduled for a public hearing on June 14, 1994. 6. Walcott Corridor: The City Council will consider awarding the project design to RBF & Associates at the April 26, 1994 Council meeting. Staff has conducted its kickoff meeting and the design may start on the first of May. 7. Pala Road/Route 79S Interim Improvements A contract has been entered into with Trans-Pacific Consultants to perform professional engineering services on Pala Road/Route 79S for a east bound to south bound right turn lane. The consultant will prepare improvement plans, engineer's estimate, and will obtain a Caltrans encroachment permit. pwO4~moectrpt~cip~94~April 04113/94 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager .. Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer April 26, 1994 Public Works Monthly Activity Report RECOMMENDATION: Attached for City Council's review and filing is the Department of Public Works' Monthly Activity Reports for March, 1994. ,, \agdrpt\0222\moaetrpt n UJ LAND DEVELOPMENT Monthly Activity Report Special Projects March, 1994 Submitted b~Tim D. Serlet Prepared by:Pl~aymond A. Casey Date: April 18, 1994 FEMA/OES REIMBURSEMENT: Staff is continuing to coordinate with the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the State Office of Emergency Services (OES) representatives in seeking reimbursement for costs incurred by the City due to the January 1993 floods and ensuing disaster declaration. OES has reimbursed the City a total of $246,297 to date. LIEFER ROAD/BRIDGE (PROJECT NO. PW93-02): The project is currently under construction. The bridge sections have been placed on the abutments, the bridge decking has been poured, and the forming of the concrete barriers is ongoing. The next construction activities will be grading the channel and constructing the bridge approaches. _ PARKVIEW SITE (PROJECT NO. PW93-09): The biological review for the Parkview Site is underway. No Gnatcatchers were observed during the first of three required site reviews. ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 159 (AD 159): The Temecula Creek Channel Improvements from Butterfield Stage Road west to the westerly edge of the Presley property are under construction with project completion now anticipated by mid-fall. The Supplemental Assessment District was presented to the Riverside Debt Advisory Council who requested more information before making a decision. De Portola Road and Butterfield Stage Road are scheduled for completion by May 10. ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 1 61 (AD 1 61 ): The construction of the Santa Gertrudis Creek Channel Improvements from Winchester Road easterly for about one-half mile, and the Nicolas Road Improvements easterly from Winchester Road for about one mile, are underway and on schedule. The Assessment District Staff is preparing a resolution for the formation of a Supplemental Assessment District to present to the Board of Supervisors for action. Seventy percent (70%) of the property owners' consent for the Supplemental District has been obtained. A schedule for the provision and priority of the improvements is also being prepared by Staff at this time. pw12~moactrpt\dev%94%February 041894 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: MEMORANDUM Tim D. Serlet, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Brad Buron, Maintenance Superintendent April 1, 1994 Monthly Activity Report - March 1994 The following activities were performed by Public Works Department, Street Maintenance Division in-house personnel for the month of March 1994: II. III. IV. SIGNS A. Total signs replaced B. Total signs installed C. Total signs repaired TREES A. Total trees trimmed for sight distance and street sweeping concerns POTHOLES A. Total square feet of potholes repaired CATCH BASINS A. Total catch basins cleaned RIGHT-OF-WAY WEED ABATEMENT A. Total square footage for right-of-Way abatement GRAFFITI REMOVAL A. Total locations A. Total S.F. VI. 15 50 5 35 225 92 13,900 49 7,918 Also, City Maintenance staff responded to 23 service order requests ranging from weed abatement, tree trimming, sign repair, A.C. failures, litter removal, and catch basin cleanings. This is compared to 21 service order requests for the month of February, 1994. The Maintenance Crew has also put in 85.5 hours of overtime which includes standby time, P.M. surveillance (weekends only), and response to street emergencies. pwO5~roads~actrpt\94\03 04113/94 MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT- March, 1994 Page No. 2 ORANGE COUNTY STRIPING AND STENCILING COMPANY has completed the following: · 0 L.F. of new and repainted striping · 0 L.F. of sand blasting · 0 L.F. of red curb · 0 new and repainted legends The total cost for Orange County striping services was $0.00 compared to $12,836.97 for February, 1994. PESTMASTER SERVICES has comoleted the foliowine: · 5 sites, 112,725 S.F. of right-of-way weed control, total cost 91,350.82 comparer $7,773.00 for February, 1994. The total cost for Street Maintenance performed by Contractors for the month of March, 1994 was 11,488.82 compared to $29,438.06 for the month of February, 1994. Account No. 5402 Account No. 5401 $10,138.00 $0.00 CC: Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects Raymond A. Casey, Principal Engineer - Land Development Martin C. Lauber, Traffic Engineer pw05\roeds~ectrpt%94~03. 04/13~94 MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT- March, 1994 Page No. 3 STREET MAINTENANCE CONTRACTORS The following contractors have performed the following project for the month of December. ARBOR-PRO TREE SERVICE Account No. 5402 Date: March 8, 1994 30603 Milky Way Remove and stump grind one tree Total Cost $275.00 Account No. 5402 Date: March 29, 1994 41819 Asteroid Remove and stump grind one tree Total Cost $250.00 NELSON PAVING AND SEALING Account No. 5402 Date: March 4, 1994 EMERGENCY STREET REPAIR FRONT STREET ~ SECOND STREET Remove approx. 100 sq. ft. of 3" asphalt material and haul to dump (2 loads). Excavate existing soils to depth of 3' to hit hard pan surface. Replace removed area with class no. 2 base material and recompact with vibratory roller. Furnish and place 3" A/R 4000 asphalt material in area approx. 100 sq. ft. Price includes 4 man crew, traffic control, dump truck with compressor, roller, tack rig, set up truck, asphalt and base material, with dump fees included. Total S.F. 100 Total A.C. 3 Tons Total Cost $2,100.00 pwOS\roeds\actrpt%94%03 04/13/94 MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT- March, 1994 Page No. 4 Account No. 5402 Date: March 28, 1994 Saw cut approx. 70 sq. ft. of asphalt, and dispose of legally. Grade and compact subgrade, place ground sterilizer, and asphalt patch removed section of approx. 450 sq. ft. to construct 12 asphalt swale. Furnish and place class 11 base on shoulder to match existing edge of pavement. Total A.C. 10 Tons Total S.F. 450 Total Cost $2,629.00 Account No. 5402 Date: March 29, 1994 Diaz s/o Winchester F/S/B/T Remove and replace 3 areas of asphalt roadway. Total sq. ft. 1184 sq. ft. Total A.C. 34.5 Tons Total S.F. 1184 Total Cost $4,213.00 MONTELEONE EXCAVATING Account No. 5402 Date: March 14, 1994 Repair and fill hole surrounding telephone pole. 9 hours. labor. Total Cost $900.00 ORANGE COUNTY STRIPING INC. Account No. 5402 Date: March 30, 1994 Ynez n/o Equity Repair 25 L.F. of Ribbon Barrier Total Cost $935.00 Rate includes materials, truck, tractor and pwOS~roade\actrpt~94%03 04113/94 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION I DATE 03-02-94 03-02-94 03-03-94 03-07-94 03-07-94 03-07-94 03-08-94 0 ~-94 03-10-94 03-10-94 03-11-94 03-14-94 03-'15-94 o3-15-94 03-16-94 03-17-94 03-21-94 03-21-94 03-24-94 03-25-94 03-29-94 03-29-94 (~' ~9-94 I LOCATION 29483 Cara Way 31168 Calle Aragon Ynez Road S/O R.Calif. Road 29662 Amwood Way 41197 Via Cielito 31177 Mariposa 31250 Corte Alhambra 31241 Corte Alhambra Bajia Vista Park 31900 Calle Chapos 41693 Ave. de la Reina Ynez @ Preece and Gatewood 31964 Corte Avalina Margarita & Moraga Road 30340 Colina Verde 31021 Via Gilberto 41819 Asteriod 29820 Avenida Cima del Sol 29662 Amwood Way 29779 Calle Pantano Ynez Road & Rancho Calif. Road 42650 Tierra Robles Place 28780 Front Street WORK COMPLETED MARCH 1994 SERVICE ORDER REQUEST LOG IREQUEST Sink Hole Tree removal Manhole cover missing Potholes Pavement repair Drainage concern Root pruning Root pruning Graffiti Requesting A.C. street instead of dirt. Water leak Graffiti Street repairs Weed spraying Pothole Drainage concern Tree removal Storm drain repair Dead tree Litter removal Graffiti Sweeper concern Request for cones TOTAL $.O.R'S. 23 WORK COMPLETED 03-03-94 03-03-94 03-03-94 03-07-94 03-07-94 03-07-94 03-08-94 03-08-94 03-10-94 03-10-94 03-11-94 03-14-94 03-16-94 03-16-94 03-16-94 03-17-94 03-21-94 03-21-94 03-24-94 03-25-94 03-29-94 03-29-94 03-29-94 pwO3~,roads~wkcmpltd\94~O3.svrq 040494 DATE 03-01-94 03-01-94 03-01-94 03-01-94 03-01-94 03-02-94 03-03-94 03-03-94 03-03-94 03-03-94 03-03-94 03-04-94 03-04-94 03-04-94 03-07-94 03-07-94 03-07-94 03--07-94 03-07-94 03-07-94 03-07-94 03-08-94 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION WORK COMPLETED MARCH 1994 GRAFFITI REMOVAL LOCATION Villa del Mar Condos Moraga L~ Margarita Southern Cross @ Rancho Vista Mira Loma ~ Rancho Vista McCabe @ Amarita Camino Dei Este @ Camino Verde Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed WORK COMPLETED 600 S.F. of Graffiti 18 S.F. 'of Graffiti 4 S.F. of Graffiti 10 S.F. of Graffiti 8 S.F. of Graffiti 78 S.F. of Graffiti Temecula Villas Apts. 28747 Pujol Street Winchester Creek Collection 28550 Pujol Street 28870 Pujol Street Villa del Mar Apts. and Channel Target Center NIE/O Linkletter Storage Rear of Target Center 42140 Lyndie Lane 27706 Jefferson 28475 Front Street Main Street L~ Mercedes 6th @ Mercedes 28410 Front Street 41920 Sixth Street Ynez N/O Rancho Vista Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed 4 S.F. of Graffiti 36 S.F. of Graffiti 36 S.F. of Graffiti 959 S.F. of Graffiti 36 S.F. of Graffiti 2,503 S.F. of Graffiti 104 S.F. of Graffiti 1,008 S.F. of Graffiti 770 S.F. of Graffiti 91 S.F. of Graffiti 6 S.F. of Graffil 4 S.F. of Graffiti 6 S.F. of Graffiti 10 S.F. of Graffiti 240 S.F. of Graffiti 10 S.F. of Graffiti -1 - pwO3\roads\wkcmpltd\94\O3.Graffili 041194 GR TI - April, 1994 03-08-94 03-08-94 03-08- 94 03-09-94 03-09-94 03-09-94 03-09-94 03-09-94 03-10-94 03-11-94 03-11-94 03---14-94 O~ ~94 03-14-94 03-15-94 03-15-94 03-16-94 03-16-94 03-17-94 03-18-94 03-22-94 03-22-94 03-22-94 03-29-94 03-29-94 03-29-94 03-31-94 Meadows Parkway @ Rancho California Road Meadows Parkway @ Rancho Vista Rancho Vista @ Ave. de la Reina 42081 Main Street 28522 Front Street Sport's Park C.R.C. Utility Boxes · Ynez Road @ Rancho Vista Ave. de la Reina 27300 Jefferson 27313 Jefferson Rancho Vista @ Camino Romo Rancho Vista @ Margarita Preece of Gatewood Rancho California Road @ Ynez Road Vons Shopping Center 28497 Pujol Montezuma ~ Jefferson Rancho Vista W/O Calle Aragon 42200 Pujol Street Rancho Vista N/O Via del Campo Meadows Parkway @ School E. Loma Linda Park Rancho Vista @ Ynez Road 28747 Pujol Street 28550 Pujol Street Rancho Vista @ Via El Greco Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed 2 12 15 10 3 2 50 180 6 35 15 54 125 30 60 '15 28 8 18 6 170 68 270 6 348 2 S.F. of Graffiti 1 S.F. of Graffiti S.F. of Graffiti S.F. of Graffiti S.F. of Graffiti S.F. of Graffiti S.F. of Graffiti S.F. of Graffiti S.F. of Graffiti S. F. of Graffiti S. F. of Graffiti S.F. of Graffiti S.F. of Graffiti S.F. of Graffiti S.F. of Graffiti S.F. of Graffiti S.F. of Graffiti S.F. of Graffiti S.F. of Graffilti S.F. of Graffiti S.F. of Graffiti S.F. of Graffiti S.F. of Graffiti S.F. of Graffiti S.F. of Graffil S.F. of Graffiti S.F. of Graffiti -2- pwO3\roads\wkcmpltd\94~O3.Graffiti 041194 GRAFFITI - April, 1994 49 TOTAL LOCATIONS 7.918 TOTAL $Q. FT. -;3- pwO3%roads\wkcmpltd%94~O3.Graffitj 041194 03-09-94 03-09-94 03-22-94 03-23-94 03-24-94 03-29-94 03=-29-94 C J-94 03-30-94 03-31-94 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION WORK COMPLETED MARCH 1994 WEED ABATEMENT Third Street @ Mercedes Front Street @ 6th Street Via Gilberto @ Cul-de-sac Rancho Vista E/O Mira Loma Rancho Vista W/O Mira Loma Vincent Moraga @ 6th Street Pujol ~ 6th Street Felix Valdez Front Street N & S of Rancho California Road Front Street @ 4th Street Abated 650 R.O.W. Weeds Abated 150 R.O.W. Weeds Abated 100 R.O .W. Weeds Abated 2,700 R.O.W. Weeds Abated 4,000 R.O.W. Weeds Abated 2,000 R.O.W. Weeds Abated 1,500 R.O.W. Weeds Abated 2,200 R.O.W. Weeds Abated 300 R.O.W. Weeds Abated 300 R.O.W. Weeds 13,900 TOTAL SQ. FT. WEED ABATEMENT -1 - pw03%roads~wkcmpltd~94\03.Weeds 041194 J DATE 03-08-94 03-08-94 03-25-94 I LOCATION Area #1 Areas #3 and #4 Areas #1 - #4 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION WORK MARCH 1994 CA TCH BASINS I WORK COMPLETED Cleaned and secured Cleaned and secured Cleaned and secured QUANTITY 50 basins 15 basins 27 basins TOTAL CATCH BASINS CLEANED AND SECURED 92 pw03%roads~wkcrnpltd~94~,.03%cb 040894 ~DATE 03-02-94 03-02-94 C 9-94 03-10-94 03-22-94 03-22-94 03-22-94 03-22-94 03-23-94 03-24-94 03-29-94 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION WORK COMPLETED MARCH 1994 LOCATION Monte Verde ~ Via Norte Via Puerta @ Camino del Este Rancho Calif. Rd. @ Asteroid Milky Way ~ Asteroid Margarita S/O Rancho Calif. Rd. Margarita N/O Rancho Vista Rancho Vista E & W Southern Cross Cabo Street @ Vallejo Rancho Vista E/O Mira Loma Saddlewood Channel Solana Way ~ Rycrest TREE TRIMMING ~WORK COMPLETED Trimmed I tree Trimmed 2 trees Trimmed I tree Trimmed 5 trees Trimmed 2 trees Trimmed I tree Trimmed 4 trees Trimmed 2 trees Trimmed 15 trees Trimmed I tree Removed I dead tree TOTAL TREES TRIMMED TOTAL TREES REMOVED 35 1 pwO3%roade~wkcmpltd~94%O3.tre 040694 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION WORK COMPLETED MARCH 1994 SIGNS DATE 03-01-94 03-02-94 03-02-94 03-07-94 03-07-94 03-08-94 03-08-94 03-08-94 03-09-94 03-11-94 03-14-94 03-15-94 03-15-94 03-16-94 03-16-94 03-16-94 03-16-94 03-17-94 03-21-94 03-21-94 03-22-94 LOCATION Club House - Masters-Loma Linda {i) Pala Road Vintage Hills ~) Resaca Avenida Barca N/O Margarita Avenida Barca-Los Noglas ~i) Del Rey Winchester {i) Jefferson Feb + Calle Ventis ~ Diaz C.R.C. County Center ~ Equity Rainbow Canyon Road @ Pala Mercedes ~ Main Street Ynez between Solana Way & Winchester Pina Colada N/O Del Rey N. Gen. Kerney E/O La Colima 41850 Moreno 6th ~i) Mercedes 6t L~ Front Via La Vida @ Margarita Rancho Vista ~ High School Margarita ~ Hwy. 79 Margarita ~i) N. General Kearney Margarita ~ N, General Kearney WORK COMPLETED Replaced 3 R-l's (Graffiti) Repaired R-1 Installed 5 R-260 D Repaired 2 R-l's Repaired "K" Marker Installed S.N.S. and repaired R-1 Installed 2 Spec. Signs Replaced R-1 (Missing) Replaced R-1 "Old" Repaired R-1 Installed 16 "K" Markers Installed Installed Installed Installed Installed Installed Replaced Replaced Repaired Replaced W-45 2 W-45 2 Carsonites 2 Specialty Signs 2 Specialty Signs S.N.S. & replaced R-1 "old" R-26 B.L. "T.C." W-11 "Stolen" G-5 W-7-A "Knocked do~ pwO3\road\wkcmpltd\94\O3\sgn 040694 SIGNS - April, 1994 C ?-94 03-23-94 03-23-94 03-28-94 03-31-94 La Serena E/O Calle Medusa Riverton (b Enfield C.R.C. Solana Way S/O Ynez Road Via El Greco ~i) Corte Pacheco Replaced W-31 & "N" Installed R-1 Installed 15 R-26-F Replaced W-41 "T.C." Replaced R-1 "old" Graffiti TOTAL SIGNS REPLACED 15 TOTAL SIGNS INSTALLED 50 TOTAL SIGNS REPAIRED 5 pwO3~road\wkcmpltd%94%O3\sgn 040694 ..2 0 0 uJ I- z o o ee ee O. O. O. O. O. 01 O. ~ 0 0 0 0 0 (~ 0 ., .. ,. ,,. ~ ;~ o ,,, ~ ~ ~ ,P. (~1 oo o o o m o ~o h~o oB o8 o o o J: (.) TRAFFIC DIVISION Monthly Activity Report For March, 1994 Submitted by:~m D. Serlet Prepared by: Marty Lauber 4//,~ Date: April 15, 1994 I. TRAFFIC REQUESTS · TRAFFIC; REQUESTS:::::: .... Jan' Feb".. March Completed 14 15 9 Under Investigation 7 9 10 Scheduled for Traffic Commission 2 1 4 II. ON GOING PROJECTS: Held the first meeting of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission's Jefferson Street Sub-Committee. The sub-committee was formed to study traffic operations along Jefferson Avenue from Via Montezuma to Sanborn Avenue. Inventorled traffic signal equipment in storage to appraise the financial impact of constructing a traffic signal for Margarita Road at Solana Way. Met with Temecula Valley Unified School District representative to fine tune the suggested route to school exhibit for Sparkman Elementary School. Staff is developing an Auto Cad file for plotting these new exhibits. Worked with Caltrans to expedite the addition of stops on State Highway 79(S) at Margarita Road. Re-striped a portion of Rancho Vista Road creating a left turn pocket into the main entrance to the Temecula Community Recreation Center. Submitted final grant application to the Office of Traffic Safety for a traffic device inventory. Grant approval could provide for a project start date this summer. r,~,moactq~t%traffic%94~marchlajp Traffic Division Monthly Activity Report For March, 1994 Page 2 Status of Design Projects " LoCation· ' ' ' ' "" ': ":" '~: Nicolas RdANinchester Rd - 100% Temporary Traffic Signal * Avenida Barca/Margarita Rd- 100% Traffic Signal * Margarita Rd/S.R. 79 (S) - 40% Traffic Signal ** Pala Rd/S.R. 79 (S) - Rt. turn 40% lane Emergency Vehicle Pre-Emption 100% System ···Design Drafting 95% 95% 0% 5% Prepared RFP Traffic Signal Submitted to Caltrans - February 28, 1994 On hold awaiting funding commitment from Caltrans for matching funds. Available funding will determine scope of project. r.\moactrpt\traffic\94\marchlmjp TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ITEM 1 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT HELD MARCH 22, 1994 A regular meeting of the Temecula Community Services District was called to order at 9:10 PRESENT: 5 DIRECTORS: Birdsall, Parks, Mu~oz, Stone, Roberrs PM. ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None Also present were General Manager Ronald E. Bradley, City Attorney Scott F. Field and June S. Greek, City Clerk· PUBLIC COMMENTS None given. CONSENT CALENDAR It was moved by Director' Birdsall, seconded by Director Parks to approve Consent Calendar Item No. 1. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Minutes 1.1 1.2 5 0 0 DIRECTORS: Birdsall, Mu~oz, Parks, Stone, Roberts DIRECTORS: None DIRECTORS: None Approve the minutes of February 22, 1994; Approve the minutes of March 8, 1994. GENERAL MANGER'S REPORT None given. CITY ATTORNEY REPORT None given. Minutes'/032294 -1- O4114/94 CSD Minutes - March 22. 1994 DIRECTORS REPORTS Director Birdsall announced the Community Recreation Center will hold its Grand Opening Friday, March 25, 1994, at 6:00 PMo ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Director Birdsall, seconded by Director Roberrs to adjourn at 9:12 PM to a meeting on April 5, 1994, 8:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. The motion was unanimously carried. Jeff Stone, President ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk\TCSD Secretary Minutes/032294 -2- 04114/94 ITEM NO. 2 APPR VAL CITY ATTORNEy' ~~ FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGE CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: Board of Directors FROM: Ronald E. Bradley, General Manager DATE: April 26, 1994 SUBJECT: Contract For July 4th, 1994 Fireworks Show PREPARED BY: Herman D. Parker, Recreation Superintendent~~ RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors: Award a contract to Robert Caran Productions to produce the City o~r Temecula's 1994 July 4th Fireworks Show. BACKGROUND: Plans are currently underway for the City of Temecula's July 4th, 1994 Fireworks Show. This year's program will be entitled "The Temecula Star Spangled 4th" and is scheduled to be held at the Rancho California Sports Park beginning at 9:00 p.m. sharp. Other planned events for July 4th include a parade in the Old Town area, band performances at the Sports Park, and music provided by local radio stations. Robert Caran Productions will produce one twenty (20) minute fireworks display/show synced to an audio soundtrack of the country's most patriotic musical scores, with playback via KGGI Radio 99.1 FM, and KRTM radio 88.9 FM at the Rancho California Sports Park. Robert Caran ProductiOns is the 'only fireworks display/show company that can produce a unique programming format that utilizes a custom-designed stereo soundtrack complete with computer-controlled synchronization for all electronically fired pyro sync-launch show elements. Their services also offer complete show design, all necessary on-site production personnel, and production of all on-air promotional advertisement venue for local radio stations. It is therefore recommended that Robert Caran Productions produce the City's 1' 994 July 4th Fireworks Show for the citizens of Temecula. FISCAL IMPACT: The total contract is ~ 17,000 and is included in the FY 1993-94 TCSD budget in account 190-183-999-5301. 3d~gendss\4thjuly.~gn 1994 JULY 4TH FIREWORKS DISPLAY CONTRACT Whereas, ROBERT CARAN PRODUCTIONS, located at 8555 Laurens Lane, Suite 1512, San Antonio, Texas 78218, (herein after referred to as RCP~, as a full service media production company, is desirous of serving as "PRODUCER" for the DESIGN and PRODUCTION of the July 4th, 1994 OUTDOOR Summer Fireworks presentation entitled "THE TEMECULA STAR SPANGLED 4TH" located on the property of the CITY OF TEMECULA known as SPORTS PARK, Temecula, California. And, Whereas, THE CITY OF TEMECULA, located at 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California 92590, [herein after referred to as "COT"], which manages, operates and mainatains the City of Temecula and is desirous of securing RCP to create, produce, install and operate sai,' presentation as described in Attachment "A" [the Proposal] and made part of this contract. IT IS UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED BY ALL PARTIES THAT: 1. RCP will produce for COT the following production: One, (l~-Twenty, (20) minute to Twenty-five, (25~ minute outdoor fireworks display/show s~nced to audio soundtrack with playback broadcast via FM radio station at the Sports Park show site as described in Attachment "A" and'made part of this agreement. Said presentation will be designed, produced, delivered, installed and played back in a pre-recorded format. 2. RCP agrees to deliver the presentation consisting of project management and supervision, creative development, show design, programmed stereo soundtrack, all necessary on-site production personnel and choreographed pyrotheatrics for the Sports Park show site according to the Production Schedule, Attachment "B", and made part of this agreement. 3. COT shall pay RCP the cost for the production, all materials, miscellaneous production equipment, services and shipping of show elements outlined below, which cost is SEVENTEEN-THOUSAND-DOLLARS [$17,000.00]' as detailed in Attachment "C" [the Budget] and made part of this agreement. 8555 LAURENS LANE, SUITE 1512, SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS, 210-804-1900 -2- 4.'RCP will supply the following materials and services toward the production, completion and installation of the above-mentioned presentation: * Overall Project Management, Supervision, Coordination, Operations * Overall project management and coordination with COT personnel for use of all COT equipment procurement and show site logistics. * Detailed site survey of display/show site. * All Creative development of proposed show elements. * One continuously running stereo soundtrack for display sync. * All choreographed pyrotheatrics [fireworks] for One [1] electrically fired display/show at the Sports Park display/show site. * Load-in, installation, set-up and strike of all production- presentation elements at the Sports Park display/show site. * Technical Coordination and supervision of all on-site load-in and set-up of all COT [client-supplied] equipment necessary for the successful operation/playback of said. display. * Consultation, design and coordination of all general public viewing areas and operations control areas for the presentation. * All necessary ON-SITE RCP/San Diego Fireworks production personnel to load, launch, perform and secure the display site. 5. The presentation will take place at the site agreed upon by both parties on the premises of COT property at Sports Park, Temecula, California. The official date for the show will be MONDAY, JULY 4th, 1994. Said show will be performed ONCE commencing at 9:00 P.M. ANY additional performances will be considered EXTRA above and beyond the above-mentioned cost as described in paragraph three, [3], and the overall show costs contained herein and said cost for these additional shows will be negociated by both RCP and COT and executed by approved Letter of Agreement. TOTAL NUMBER OF DISPLAYS/SHOWS: ONE, (1), Pre-programmed for sync to stereo broadcast playback. 6. All reasonable requests for information, advisory personnel, equipment, vehicles, aircraft, prints and plans of COT materials, show site or any advertising materials or activities relating to the project and access to the appropriate personnel at COT are to be made available upon mutual agreement of both COT and RCP and at no cost to RCP. 7. Any additional production or additional fireworks product requested by COT added to the above mentioned display set forth on July 4th, 1994 to be completed by RCP, will involve additional costs and will be covered by a separate agreement at rates to be negotiated. -3- CANCELLATION 8. A. Should the weather prove unfavorable on the date[s] set for said display, postponement may be arranged for display to be fired on the next following CLEAR date upon agreement by both parties, but such postponement shall be decided on and notice given to RCP no later than THREE O' CLOCK P.M. on the day on which the display SHOULD be held and COT agrees to pay RCP for any and all additional expenses made necessary by such postponement. Should the display be cancelled and not postponed, COT agrees to pay RCP for all costs incurred, up to and including the day of cancellation including all RCP operations personnel, Pyrotheatrics operators, permits and insurance. In addition to the above-stated cancellation charges, COT agrees to pay RCP a 10% restocking fee for pyro, equipment and services based on the contract price as described in paragraph three, [3] above provided that the compensation not exceed the total compensation due under this contract, and COT will not be liable for any and all unadvanced expenditures beyond the date of cancellation. B. COT agrees to ASSUME FULL RISK of weather or other causes beyond the control of RCP and/or its contracted pyrotheatric vendor, San Diego Fireworks, which may affect or damage such portion of the fireworks display at the show site as fireworks must be placed in position and exposed to a necessary time interval PRIOR to the scheduled commencement of the display. C. COT agrees to provide for the period commencing at 8:00 A.M. on SATURDAY, July 2, 1994 through TUESDAY, July 5th, 1994 at 2:00 P.M. adequate police and/or security personnel to PREVENT the general public from entering the immediate area designed for the firing of the display, the control and their fallout areas. Any COT or general public vehicles or COT or general public personal property located within the designated firing/fallout area shall be removed at COT'S expense. Any damage or destruction of said vehicles and/or residential/private personal property,. injury's or death to any persons left remaining within the designated firing/fallout areas shall be the sole responsibility and liability of COT. COT shall also be liable for any damage or theft of any RCP and San Diego Fireworks Company equipment caused by the general public or COT personnel while any such equipment is located at the designated firing area where RCP's, San Diego Fireworks or any other subcontracted vendors equipment secured by RCP for the successful operation and execution of the display is located. COT agrees to provide at their sole expense any and all fire protection equipment and personnel standby personnel so required by any local or state governmental authority. RCP and its subcontracted vendors agree to furnish to COT adequate insurance coverage in connection with the fireworks display only for the following amounts: SECTION 8, PARAGRAPH E, Cont'd. 14- Bodily Injury and Personal Property Damage including Products liability in the amount of $1,000,000.00 (One Million Dollars} or in an amount as required by COT not to exceed $1,000,000.00 combined single limits with COT and RCP to be named .as additional insured. The insurance coverage shall otherwise satisfy the term and conditions, and include the forms contained in Exhibit "A". COT will have ten, [10] days prior to the display to approve insurance submissions of additional vendors. F. In the event the display is cancelled or interrupted due to equipment failure or malfunction, water leakage, fire or other damage in/to the display/show site, fallout area and fireworks launch area as a result of inclement weather, fire, damage to equipment and/or show elements as a result of construction mishaps or interference by COT or the GENERAL PUBLIC, ALL operations of the presentation will CEASE. COT and RCP will notify each other immediately. Said causes for "down time" will be evaluated by RCP and COT, documented as to repair costs. Following evaluation and approval by COT, RCP will effect repairs as fast as possible and will detail and invoice COT upon approval by COT. Any and all expenses [operating personnel, maintenance, equipment rentals, permits, insurance, etc.], related to and incurred during the 'down time' of the presentation, will be the responsibility of COT. COT reserves the right to cancel the presentation at any time. 9. In the event the fireworks display is cancelled due to rain, high wind or inclement weather, the event will be rescheduled as described in Section 8, Paragraph A as agreed upon by both COT and RCP. RCP reserves the right to consult with COT and to upon mutual agreement cancel the pyrotheatrical display if the weather conditions in RCP's and San Diego Fireworks view present a danger to the general public,'show site, RCP production personnel and any and all RCP and subcontracted vendor property at the site. DELAY OF SHOW With respect to DELAY OF SHOW, RCP GUARANTEES that the pyrotheatric display will be fired at 9:00 P.M. on MONDAY, July 4th, 1994 and that COT allow for twenty [20], minutes each side of that hour should ANY delay' be necesssary so that RCP and San Diego Fireworks can effect repairs as a result of caused delay. This guarantee does not apply should any failure of the shows radio broadcast as a result of malfunction at Radio Station/stations occur, telephone communications link between control areas and show site be disrupted, breech of security resulting in damage to any and all show equipment by General Public, third party persons or unwarranted cancellation or delay by COT personnel, fire authorities and associated fire prevention personnel, Acts of God or as stated in Section 8, Paragraphs'A through F. SECTION 9, Cont'd. -5- 10. A. Should RCP fail to fire displays within the "window" of time as described above as result of its neglience than according to the payment schedule as detailed in Section 13, COT shall RETAIN final payment as compensation for delay of show. If the Pyrotheatrics display is cancelled due to the neglience of RCP, all payments made by COT shall be refunded to COT. RCP AGREES TO: Provide the pyrotheatrics display/show as detailed in Attachments A, B, C, D, and .E - Detail of pyrotheatrics to be utilized in the display/show. Provide all necessary production personnel and back-up production personnel to execute each assigned function in the production of the display as described in Attachment "A", EXCLUDING security personnel, fire prevention personnel load-out of any and all COT supplied elements, crowd control personnel and any other non-contracted personnel or equipment not identified in this contract in writing and submitted to RCP in advance. Through the subcontracted vendor, San Diego Fireworks, provide TWO (2~ licensed pyrotheatrics operators and all other licensed pyrotheatric support personnel necessary to safely execute said pyrotheatrical display. Obtain all necessary pyrotechnical permits and licenses for all display/show elements. REQUIRE all vendors to obtain and maintain a comprehensive general liability insurance policy as detailed in Section 8, Paragraph E. In addition, all vendors shall obtain and maintain policies of Worker's Compensation insurance covering their respective employees. VENDOR 'Certificates of Insurance' evidencing such liability insurance and Worker's Compensation insurance shall be filed with COT within 'thirty days prior to the commencement of the display. Provide at least (2), 2-1/2 gallon water pressurized fire extinguishers or their equivalent within the display area at all times. Store, transport from storage site, set up, launch and strike the pyrotheatrical display. Remove and safely dispose of all pyrotheatrical debris from the display site IMMEDIATELY following the presentation. Provide all necessary maintenance for RCP personnel and equipment. 11. A. 12. -6- Provide,.transport and utilize all necessary equipment, weather-proofing materials and internal communications equipment [for RCP production personnel only], required for the successful operation for the display. Provide reasonable training to employees of COT if requested by COT and/or RCP as deemed necessary for the successful execution and operation of shows. COT AGREES TO: Provide ALL additional permits and licenses if any [excluding pyrotechnical display permits & licenses] necessary to operate & perform display at the site. Further, COT will wave any and all business operations fees or taxes for RCP for this one day event. Provide site location[s] for display presentation. Provide one night "Safe Haven" pyro storage area on July 3, 1994. Provide all necessary COT technical and non-technical personnel for the load-in, set-up and strike of all COT production elements and installation of two, [2] separate telecommunications lines, plus [2] telephones, 2 COT 2-way radio's, for communications link between the radio station and Sports Park show site. Telephone installation provided by COT will be activated on or before THURSDAY, June 30th, 1994. In addition, all fire prevention equipment, COT equipment transport vehicles, water vehicles, staging platforms [if any], water hook-up and strike, prints andsplans for the successful installation of the show site will be provided by COT. COT will provide for all necessary power/water' hook-up and strike at show site for the duration of the project including: Load-in and set-up prior to display beginning at 8:00 A.M. SATURDAY, July 2, 1994 through TUESDAY, JULY 5th, 1994. To provide all on-site rigging equipment, mechanical services and sand necessary for the safe and successful load-in, set-up, installation and operation of the display beginning at 8:00 A.M. SUNDAY, July 3, 1994. COT shall furnish and set-up in conjunction with RCP designs all necessary personnel as described in Section 10, Paragraph B, and such restraining lines, stanchions, etc. as necessary for the protection of the public and operating personnel. COT will provide security throughout all Load-in, set-up, display and strike. Any costs in addition to the contracted price stated in Section "3" and on the attached breakdown in Attachment "C", will be incurred only with prior approval by COT in writing at rate to be negotiated. 14. 15. 16. -7- With regard to payment schedule, the first payment of $9,000.00 is payable from COT to RCP no later than MAY 13, 1994. The second payment of $4,500.00 from COT to RCP is payable by JUNE 1, 1994. The third payment of $3,500.00 from COT to RCP is due IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING THE SHOW JULY 4TH, 1994. Any additional approved costs or out-of-pocket expenses [if any] are payable within ten - [10] days following the completion~of the project or July 14th, 1994. COT recognizes that time is of the essence with regard to payment as set forth in the payment schedule outlined above. Should COT elect to supplement the pyrotheatric content of the display, the costs for the increased product will be evaluated and paid by COT as described in paragraph 7. COT designates SHAWN NELSON and/or HERMAN PARKER or any other designated COT representative to grant approval where called for during the production of all elements. This representative is authorized by COT to approve or demand reasonable appropriate changes of said elements where deemed necessary. RCP will be entitled to additional compensation should any significant changes, additions or deletions be necessary after the approval by the above-mentioned representative[s] of COT of any particular stage or element of production. All requests for changes, additions or deletions of any elements of the production not outlined within the context of this agreement throughout the course of the project, will submitted and approved by both parties in writing in the form of a PROJECT CHANGE NOTICE, "PCN". [Refer to Attachment "D"]. With respect to SPONSORSHIP, RCP will work closely with COT in soliciting and securing sponsorship for monetary involvement to increase production value for this event as detailed in the original proposal and budget. COT will provide to RCP a "LETTER of CONFIRMATION" endorsing RCP as PRODUCER for this event and detail in said letter that COT is actively seeking sponsorship for event involvement. RCP reserves the. right to charge any and all prospective sponsors whatever fee they elect for any additional creative, advertising or marketing involvement with respect to the Temecula Star Spangled 4th production. Should RCP secure a potential sponsor for active involvement with respect to additional creative, advertising and marketing interests, their involvement will be at the sole approval of COT following submission and aproval by COT within 48 hours of submission. of these suggested creative elements. COT acknowledges that RCP's ability to perform-its obligations under this agreement in a timely manner is directly dependent on COT's obligations hereunder and that COT agrees to perform such obligations in a timely manner and to fully cooperate with RCP in the performance of this contract. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. -8- It is understood that RCP owns all rights in and to the project including copyright interest therein. COT shall have the right to use any or all of the presentation for purposes of demonstration only. In the event that the project is cancelled by COT prior to its completion, COT shall be liable to RCP for all costs for said production incurred by RCP prior to and including the date of cancellation not to exceed the total compensation due under this contract. COT WILL NOT be liable for any and all unadvanced expenditures beyond the date of cancellation. RCP will deliver all materials and elements for the · above-mentioned presentation according to the attached Production Schedule (Attachment B~ provided that COT adheres to its obligations stated in said Production Schedule. It is further agreed that the said production schedule has been prepared by RCP and is to be considered part of this agreement. Any overtime costs resulting from late submissions, late availability of product by San Diego Fireworks, personnel or materials or late approval of any and all production materials or production elements provided by COT will result in additional charges to be approved COT. It is further agreed that nothing in this agreement shall be construed or interpreted to mean or define a partnership or joint venture between the parties, all parties hereto being responsible for their separate and individual debts and obligations related to this project. It is further agreed that all parties shall in all respects comply with the laws of the state of California and its municipalities in force during the term of this contract. RCP agrees to defend, indemnify and hold COT harmless against any and all liability for injury to any person or persons or damage to any property for or by reason of any condition, whether defective or otherwise, of any equipment, firework, apparatus, electrical equipment or fixture furnished by RCP, San Diego Fireworks or any vendor of RCP pursuant to this contract. COT agrees to defend, indemniy and hold RCP harmless from and against any and all liability for injury, including death, to any person or persons or damage to any property, equipment due to the sole active negligence or sole wilful misconduct of COT in performing any of obligations hereunder. The provisions of this paragraph shall survive the terminations or expiration of this contract. This contract constitutes the entire agreement of the parties. It may not be altered, amended or modified except by an instrument in writing executed by each of the parties. It includes all representations of every kind and nature made by each of us to the other. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. -9- This contract is binding upon the parties themselves, their heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns. If any action at law is necessary to enforce or interpret the terms of this contract, the laws of California shall govern and the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorney's fees and costs. Should any one or more of the provisions of this agreement be judged unlawful by any court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions of this agreement shall remain in full force and effect. RCP represents that no payments by RCP shall be made to an COT employees, contractors, agents, or associated personnel with respect to this contract. Each of the parties hereto is authorized to execute this agreement. IN WITNESS THEREOF, the parties have executed this contract this day of , 1994. ROBERT CARAN ROBERT CARAN PRODUCTIONS 8555 LAURENS LANE STE., 1512 SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 78218 BY: CITY OF TEMECULA City Manager BY: BY: June S. Greek City Clerk Scott F. Field City Attorney DOC:D/8COTCON94 ITEM NO. 3 APPROVAL CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: Community Services Board of Directors FROM: Ronald E. Bradley, General Manager DATE: April 26, 1994 SUBJECT: Solicitation of Construction Bids for Kent Hintergardt Memorial Park (PW94-01CSD) and Loma Linda Park- Phase II (PW94-02CSD). PREPARED BY: {~hawn D. Nelson, Director of Community Services Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects Dennis Armstrong, Assistant Engineer - Capital Projects RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors approve the construction plans and specifications and authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit public construction bids for Kent Hintergardt Memorial Park (PW94-01CSD)and Loma Linda Park- Phase II (PW94-02CSD). BACKGROUND: Kent Hintergardt Memorial Park was dedicated by The Presley Companies of San Diego to the Temecuia Community Services District (TCSD) to satisfy a portion of Presley's Quimby requirements for Tract Nos. 23267 and 26861. T. CSD accepted the improvements on January 24,1994, and is proposing to construct a concession stand and restroom facility at the 9.0 acre park site. The concession stand and restroom facility will enable TCSD to accommodate future athletic events. The project includes the construction of a 950 S.F. masonry building and a 225 S.F. concrete porch area. The building consists of men's and women's restroom facilities, a storage area and a concession stand for food preparation and sales. Both the building and concession stand will be provided with sewer, water and electrical services. The porch area provides a covered access to the concession stand. Also included in the project is the installation of a concrete sidewalk from the existing parking lot to and around the building and the reconfiguration of portions of the existing landscaping and irrigation system. Loma Linda Park - Phase II is the final construction phase of Loma Linda Park. The park site, which is located within Tract Nos. 19872-3 and 19872-4, was dedicated by two different development companies after the discovery of an earthquake fault rendered 21 recorded lots unbuildable. Phase I is comprised of 14 lots encompassing approximately 2 acres and was dedicated by H.R. Remington. Phase II is comprised of 7 lots encompassing approximately I acre and was dedicated by Silverwood Temecula. pwl 3\agdrpt%94%O426%pw94-01 .bid 4/18/94 TCSD obtained the deed for phase I of Loma Linda Park on October 20,1992and construction has since been completed. TCSD obtained the deed for phase II of Loma Linda Park on January 18, 1994. The delay was caused by liens which had been recorded against the property as a result of judgements against Silverwood Temecula. TCSD negotiated the removal of the liens before obtaining the deed. The project includes the installation of landscaping and an automatic irrigation system, a tot-lot play area with rubberized access, play equipment, barbecues, benches, bike racks, and picnic tables. The project also includes the construction of concrete sidewalks, mow strips and drainage facilities. Plans, specifications and bid documents have been completed and both projects are ready to be advertised for construction bids. The engineer's estimate for the Kent Hintergardt Memorial Park improvements is $92,863 and for the Loma Linda Park - Phase II improvements is $130,000. FISCAL IMPACT: Kent Hintergardt Memorial Park is being funded through Development Impact Fees which have been appropriated to Account No. 210-190-136-5804 and Loma Linda Park - Phase II is being funded through Quimby Fees which have been appropriated to Account No. 210-190-134- 5804. The construction budget for Kent Hintergardt Memorial Park is $125,000 and for Loma Linda Park - Phase II is $175,000. pwl 3~agdrpt~94\O426~pw94-01 .bid 4118/94 ITEM NO. 4 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY~ FINANCE OFFICE CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT Community Services Board of Directors Ronald E. Bradley, General Manager April 26, 1994 Amendment to the Design Contract For Pala Community Park Project No. PW93-03CSD PREPARED BY: _(~Shawn D. Nelson, Director of Community Services RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors approve Amendment No. 4 to the design contract with Wimmer- Yamada Associates (WYA) to provide additional engineering and architectural services for Pala Community Park, Project No. PW93-03CSD, in an amount not to exceed $9,700.00. DISCUSSION: On August 25, 1992 the Board Of Directors awarded a design contract of $185,400to WYA to provide design services for Pala Community Park. Martin J. Jaska, Inc. was awarded the construction contract and was issued the notice to proceed on November 29, 1993. During the rough grading operations, it was discovered that portions of the site were unable to support the contractor's equipment. Further examination of the onsite soil conditions revealed that ground water had risen to within 1.5 feet and 4.5 feet of the surface at the northerly and southerly ends of the park site respectively. The contractor was issued a change order to determine the potential for de-watering the site such that it could sufficiently support the contractor's equipment. The subsequent tests revealed that there is the potential to de-water the site for construction purposes. pwl 3\agdq}t~g4\O426~wyaamend.no4 0412 Staff has proposed de-watering end constructing the park site in a phased manner. De- watering the easterly end of the site will allow the contractor to construct a majority of the desired park site amenities, including the basketball, tennis, and volley ball courts, the concession stand and restroom facility, and a lighted soccer field. Staff is currently negotiating with the contractor, Martin J. Jaska, Inc., to define the area of improvement within the park site, determine a final scope of work to be performed within this area, and determine the final costs for the first phase of construction. This item will be considered by the Board of Directors at the May 10, 1994 meeting. Phasing the construction of the park will require that the improvement plans be revised accordingly. These revisions are beyond the scope of work listed in Wimmer-Yamada Associates original design contract. Amendment No. 4 to the design contract will add the improvement plan revisions to the scope of work for an amount not to exceed $9,700.00. FISCAL IMPACT: The original contract amount was for $185,400.00. The adjusted contract amount is $242,413.00. Amendment No. 4 will increase the contract by $9,700.00 for a revised total contract amount of $252,113.00.Sufficient funds are available in Account No. 210-190-120- 5802. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Amendment No. 4 pwl 3\agdrpt~94~0426~wyaamend.no4 0412 AMEND~ NO. 4 WIM1VrRR-YAMADA ASSOCIATES PURCHASE ORDER NO. April 26. 1994 The Agreement dated August 25, 1992 between the City of Temecula, and Wimmer-Yamada Associates (WYA) (herein referred to as "Agreement*) is hereby amended as follows: Design Services for Pala Community Park Additional Services Pala Community Park Section 1 The scope of work is hereby amended to include additional services as listed in exhibit "A" (attached). Section 2 Compensation for services shall be total of all services described in this Amendment and shall not exeeed Nine Thousand Seven Hundred and Zero Dollars ($9,700.00). All above costs are eligible for funding through Development Impact Fees. The total cost of this element of the project is summarized below: Original Contract Amount Amendment No. 1 Amendment No. 2 Amendment No. 3 Adjusted Contract Amount Proposed Amendment No. 4 $ 185,400.00 $ 17,000.00 $ 18,975.00 $ 21.038.00 $ 242,413.00 $ 9.700.00 Total Contract Amount $ 252.113.00 pwl 3%agdrpt%94%O426\wyaamend,no4 0412 AMRNDlV~=-NT NO. 4 WIMlV~R-Y~A ASSOCIATES PURCHASE ORDER NO. Apdl 26. 1994 Section 3 All other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain the same. The parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the dam and year above written. CONSULTANT CITY OF TEMECULA By: By: Joseph Y. Yamada, FASLA President Ron Roberts, President APPROVED AS TO FORM: Scott F. Field, City Attorney ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk : pwl 3\agdrpfi94\O426\wyaamend.no4 0412 ~-IIBIT "A" TO ~IV[ENT NO. 4 (Scope of Work Attached) pwl 3%agdrpt\94~O426%wyaamend.no4 0412 March 1, 1994 Mr. Don Spagnola City Engineering Department City of Temecula 43 172 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 RE: Pala Community Park - Update Existing Design For New Park Boundaries Dear Don, As we previously discussed, we are providing you with an estimate of fees for preparing a marked set of plans defining new project boundaries and any design modifications required. Since this work is beyond the scope of services in our original agreement, these fees should be approved as an amendment to the base fee schedule. As per our discussion, we will meet with you on Wednesday, March 9 to discuss this effort in further detail. SCOPE OF WORK: WYA will mark-up drawings relative to revising limits of work for 'Phase 1" area for all landscape and harriscape design. ACI (Irrigation Consultant) will modify irrigation design for distribution and monitoring of Phase 1 work only wi.th provisions for future connections to later phases of work. Rogers Engineering (Civil Engineer) will revise plans for modification of site grading and drainage along with recon~gnring access road with future access into Kingway's tract. Uffiity/infrastructure details will be noted for modification and provisions for current work limits as well as possible future phases of work. JOSEPH Y. YAMADA. FASLA - KEITH D. SIMO,',i. ASLA - PATRICK W. CAIjGHE!: ASIA · PRI,~C!I~ALS 516 FIFTH AVENUE · SAN DIEGO. C.~LIFORNIA 92101 · 619 2324004 · FAX 619 232-0640 CA REG. ~528. #2549 AND s2895 Mr. Don Spagnola March 1, 1994 Page 2 J-Rad (Electrical Engineer) will revise plans for modification of site lighting and electrical distribution system. Sportsfield lighting will remain for soccer field/multi-purpose field as pan of Phase 1 work. Delawie Wilkes Rodrigues Barker & Bretton (Architec0 - at this time we see no changes necessary for the main concession/restroom building. The smaller restroom building will be omitted for possible future addition in later phases. LIMITS OF WORK FOR PHASE 1: (As understood by WYA)(Refer to Exhibit 'A') All of site improvements for Temecula Lane from Loma Linda to park entrance. All slxeet improvements including parking and access road to current "nuckie bend" of road alignment. All hard courts including basketball and tennis. All sand play areas including play structures and volley ball. All picnic areas and pedestrian walks. All tuff areas within eastern soccer field. All riparian habitat restoration directly north of soccer field. Main concession/restroom building and surrounding paved plaTa with vehicle drop-off and site furnishings as indicated. We would need about 2 -3 weeks to make modifications and meet with appropriate staff to coordinate information. The final drawings will be reproducible so blueline sets can be run for the contractor's use. The fee for this work will be hourly with a not to exceed amount of NINE THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED DOLLARS ($9,700.00). Mr. Don Spagnola March 1, 1994 Page 3 The following hou~y rate schedule will be used for billing purposes: Principal ................................... $120.00/hr. Project Manager .................................. $ 75.00/hr. Draftsperson ................................... $ 55.00/hr. We will call upon our consultants are necessary to coordinate work on their areas of responsibility. If you have any questions regarding this information, please contact our office. PC/il ITEM 5 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT Community Services Board of Directors Ronald E. Bradley, General Manager April 26, 1994 Professional Services Contract - Sports Park Slope Repair Project No. PW93-06CSD PREPARED BY: Dennis Armstrong, Assistant Engineer - Capital Projects RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors: 1. Authorize an advance of $9,868.00 from the General Fund to the CIP Fund. 2. Appropriate $9,868.00 from the CIP Fund to Account No. 210-166-648-5804. BACKGROUND: During the storms of January 1993, the Sports Park suffered damage to the slope below Margarita Road and to the trapezoidal earthen channel meandering through the park. On March 8, 1994 the Board of Directors awarded the construction contract to American Contracting, Inc. A portion of the construction contract requires that American Contracting, Inc. re- construct the slope and portions of the channel and construct an energy dissipator to reduce the velocity of flows entering the channel from an existing reinforced concrete box culvert. The City has retained the services of Geotechnical & Environmental Engineers, Inc. (G.E.E.) to ensure that the contractor is constructing the slope and channel improvements upon competent soil. G.E.E. will also prepare a final compaction report summarizing the test results obtained during the re-construction of the slope and the grading of the channel. The term of the professional services agreement is from March 30, 1994 to March 30, 1995 for an amount not to exceed $9,868.00. The City is eligible for a reimbursement from FEMA and the State of up to 93.75% of the cost of the agreement. A request will be submitted to FEMA for their consideration upon completion of the project. - 1 - pw 13~agdrpt~94~0426%profsve.gee FISCAL IMPACT: The professional services agreement executed with G.E.E. is for an amount not to exceed $9,868.00. Funds will be advanced from the General Fund to the CIP Fund and appropriated to the project account. The City is eligible for · reimbursement from FEMA and the State of up to 93.75% of the cost of the agreement. The General Fund will be reimbursed for the remainder of the advance (6.25% of the cost of the agreement) through the fund Balance in the TCSD - Community Services, Parks, and Recreation Budget. -2- pwl 3~,agdrpt\94\0426%profevc.gee ITEM NO. 6 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT Community Services Board of Directors Ronald E. Bradley, General Manager APril 26, 1994 Award of Construction Contract for Long Valley Wash - Channel Repair PW94-06CSD PREPARED BY: Dennis Armstrong, Assistant Engineer - Capital Projects RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors: Award a contract for the Long Valley Wash - Channel Repair, PW94-06CSD, to Monteleone Excavating, Inc. for $53,000.00and authorize the President to execute the contract. Authorize the General Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $5,300.00, which is equal to 10% of the contract amount. Appropriate $12,168 from the General Fund to Account No. 001-166-999-5401 to provide the additional funds necessary to construct the project. BACKGROUND: During the storms of January 1993, the Long Valley Wash Channel suffered damage to the reach located adjacent to the southerly side of Rancho California Road between Butterfield Stage Road and Calle Tajol (see attached site map). The damage was surveyed by representatives from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and subsequently declared eligible for disaster relief funding. The City is eligible for a reimbursement from FEMA and the State of up to 93.75% of the costs associated with the project. -1 - pw 13%agdrpt~94%O426%pw94-O6 .awd The damage occurred within two separate reaches of the channel. The first extends from Ca!le Tajol to Meadows Parkway and the second extends from Vintage Hills Drive to Butterfield Stage Road. The damage consists of the deposition and accumulation of sediment within portions of the flowline and several desilting basins, the erosion of portions of the channel's banks adjacent to and below Rancho California Road and a residential housing tract, and the erosion and undermining of portions of the channel flowline and rip-rap drop structures. Five local contractors were invited to survey the damage, discuss the scope of work required to repair the channel, and submit proposals. The scope of work includes the removal of sediment from the channel and desilting basins to the pre-flood profile, the reconstruction of the channel banks and flowline to the pre-flood profile, and the reconstruction of a cut-off wall and placement of additional rip-rap to rehabilitate a drop structure. Four of the contractors accepted the invitation and submitted proposals to the City. The results are as follows: 1. Monteleone Excavating $53,000.00 2. Del Rio Enterprise $56,000.00 3. Murrieta Development Co., Inc. $66,000.00 4. Lewis Valley Contractors, Inc. $94,911.00 The City has previously contracted with Monteleone Excavating to perform work similar in scope to the Long Valley Wash Channel Repair and the work has been completed in a satisfactory manner. Work is expected to begin in early May, 1994 and be completed by the end of May, 1994. FISCAL IMPACT: The total project amount is $58,300.00, which includes the contract amount of $53,000.00 plus the 10% contingency of $5,300.00. The original reimbursement estimate prepared by FEMA in conjunction with the City totals $47,181. Of this amount, $46,132 has been appropriated to the General Fund. An amount of $12,138, the balance of the funding required to match the total project amount, must be appropriated to Account No. 001-166-999-5401. The City is eligible for reimbursement from FEMA and the State of up to 93.75% of the costs associated with the repair of the channel. The General Fund will be reimbursed for the balance of the funds required through T.C.S.D. Service Level "C" Fund Balance. ATTACHMENT: 1. Site Map 2. Construction Contract -2- pwl 3~,agdrpt~94~O426~pw94-O6.awd H ~.~H wA~ CITY OF TEMECULA CONTRACT THIS AGIt~-gMF-NT made this 26th-day of April, 1994, by and between the City of Temecula a municipal corporation, duly organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of California, hereinafier called referred to as *C1TY" and Monteleone Excavating, hereinaftcr referred to as *CONTRACTOR. * WITNESSETH 1. The Contractor, in consideration of the promises of the City heroinafter set forth, hereby agrees to furnish atl tools, equipment, labor and materials necessary to perform and complete in a worlana~llkc manner, all of the work required for the conslruction of the improvements described in Work Order No. attached hereto. The work shall be performed according to the City of Temecula's Procedures For Informal Bidding For Public Works Maintenance Work Orders For Emergency Repairs. Fiscal Year 1993-1994. ('Informal bidding Procedu~D. Where the Work Order or the Informal Bidding Procedures describe portions of the work in general terms, but not in complete detail, the latest version of the City of Temecula. Department of Public Works Standards Drawings for Public Works Construction (*Standard Drawings'), and Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, including all supplements as written and promulgated by the Joint Cooperative Committee of the Southern California Chapter of the American Associated General Contractors of California (hereinafier, ~Standard Specifications*) shall control. Copies of the Standard Specifications are available from the publisher: Building News, Incorporated 3055 Overland Avenue Los Angeles, California 90034 (213) 202-7775 In case of any conffict between the Standard Drawings and the Standard Specifications, the Standard Drawings shall control. Where the Work Order, the Informal Bidding Procedures, the Standard Drawings, or the Standard Specifications only describe portions of the work in general terms, but not in complete detail, it is understood that the item is to be furnished and installed completed and in place and that only the best general practice is to be used. 2. The City, in consideration of the performance of this Contract, agrees to pay the Contractor and the Contractor agrees to accept in full satisfaction for the work done hereunder the sum of Fifty Three Thousand and Zero dollars ($ 53,000.00 ), in accordance with the bid of the Contractor which sum shall be paid to the Contractor within the time and in the manner set forth in the Informal Bidding Procedures, final payment to be made within thirty-five (35) days after filing Notice of Completion of said work and improvement with the Riverside County Recorder. ] r:~ip~proj~ts~pw94-06~mtrsct.qr 3. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor code of the State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft, classification, or tylx of workman needed to execute this Contract from the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. These rates are on fie in the office of the City Clerk. Copies may be obtained at cost at the City Clerk's office in Temecula. Contractor shall post a copy of such wage rates at the job site and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. Contractor shah comply with the provisions Section 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.15, 1777.6, and 1813 of the labor Code. Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, Contractor shall forfeit to the City, as a penalty, the sum of $25.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any work done under this Contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of the Contract. 4. Contractor, by executing the Contract, hereby certifies: *I am aware of the provision of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which requires every employer be insured against liability for Workman's Compensation or undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this 'Contract.* 5. All work covered by this Contract done at the site of construction or in preparing or delivering materials to the site, shall be at the risk of Contractor alone. Contractor agrees to save, indemnify, hold harmless and defend City, its officers, employees, and agents, against any and all liability, injuries, or death of persons (Contractor's employees included) and damage to property, arising direcfiy or indirecfiy out of the obligations herein undertaken or out of the operations conducted by Principal, save and except claims or litigations arising through the sole active negligence or sole willful misconduct of the City. 6. Contractor and subcontractors shall obtain all necessary licenses, including but not limited to City business licen~. 2 r:~cip~proje~ts~pw94=O6~contract .agr IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City has caused its corporate name and seal to be hereunto subscribed and affixed by the [Mayor/City Manager] and attested to by the City Clerk, both thereunto duly authorized, and the Contractor has hereunto subscribed this Contract the day, month and year hereinabove written. CITY OF TEMECULA Monteleone Excavating (Contractor) By: By: Name: Ron Roberrs Name: Title: President Title: ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk (Date) APPROVED AS TO FORM: Scott F. Field, City Attorney r:~ip~ptoj~ts~ew94-06~.4nra~t.agr ITEM NO. 7 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: PREPARED BY: (~ Phyllis RECOMMENDATION: 1. 2. 3. CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT Board of Directors Ronald E. Bradley, General Manager April 26, 1994 Rancho California Sports Park Improvement Project L. Ruse, Senior Management Analyst~~'''' That the Board of Directors: Approve the master plan for the Rancho California Sports Park Improvement Project. Adopt Negative Declaration for the project. Authorize the preparation of construction documents and release a formal public bid for the project. BACKGROUND: On November 9, 1993, the City Council awarded a design contract to J.F. Davidson and Associates for the preparation of a master plan for improvements at Rancho California Sports Park. The project area is approximately 10 acres on the southwest corner of the Rancho Vista Road and Margarita Road intersection. A project committee was established with representatives from the City Council (Ron Roberts and Jeff Stone), Community Services Commission (Henry Miller and Claudia Walker), the skateboarding community, roller hockey enthusiasts, interested community members, the design consultants, and city staff. At the first meeting, opportunities and constraints of the site were discussed as well as the various uses and amenities the committee hoped to see incorporated into the final plan. The improvements identified by the project committee include parking to accommodate an additional 300 vehicles, a foot bridge affording access from the parking improvements over the flood channel, a pedestrian circulation element, group and individual picnic facilities, a restroom/snackbar facility, landscaping, irrigation, a roller hockey rink, and a skateboarding facility. Both the roller hockey rink and skateboarding facility are proposed to have lighting appurtenances. This project is designed to more cohesively link the existing sports fields and tot lot to the new improvements while providing additional parking and improved access from Rancho Vista Road and Margarita Road. r.%c\agendam~sptspark.ced 041294 Project committee members also conducted supplementary research for the skateboarding and roller hockey improvement components. This included a field trip to Northern California and a public workshop to receive additional comments and suggestions from all interested roller hockey and skateboarding members of the community. J .F. Davidson presented two tentative design concepts at the meeting and received comments and suggestions from the public. City staff was also available to discuss issues of interest and concern with the community. J.F. Davidson and Associates incorporated the information gathered at the project committee meeting, the public workshop, and from staff's research information and observations from other sites to revamp their original design. The design under went extensive modifications to best meet thegoals of the public. The redesign was presented to the project committee at their final meeting and was approved. On April 11, 1994, the Community Services Commission conducted a noticed public hearing for the project. The Commission approved and recommended to the Board of Directors to approve the master plan and adopt the Negative Declaration for this project. FISCAL IMPACT: The approved budget in the City's Capital Improvement Program for FY 1993/94 is $1,125,000, with $125,000 for design services and $1,000,000 for construction. The construction estimate for this project, including a 10% contingency, is $1.2 million. Therefore, staff is recommending that during the upcoming Capital Improvement Program process for FY 1994/95, sufficient funds be transferred from savings of other CIP projects to fund these improvements. F.%c%agendae%sptspafk.csd 041294 _City of Temecula ?l nning Department Initial Environmental Study I. BACKGROUND INFORMATION 1. Name of Project: Rancho California Sports Park Impwvement Project 2. Case Numbers: N/A Location of Proje_-'t: Southwest comer of Rancho Vista and Margarita Roads within the Rancho California Sports Park , Description of Project: Construction of a Roller Hockey Rink, a concession/restroom facility, skateboard facfiity, group picnic area and parking lot. 5. Date of Environmental Assessment: March 21, 1994 6. Name of Proponent: City of Temecula Community Services Depathuent Address and Phone Number of Proponent: 43 174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 (909) 694-6400 ENVIRONMENTAL IIVIPACTS (Explanations to all the answers are provided in Section HI) 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: Yes Maybe No a, Unstable earth conditions or in changes geologic substructures? Disruptions, displacements, compaction, or over covering of the soil? X X Ce Change in topography or ground surface relief features? X The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? X ee Any increase in .wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? X Changes in siltation, deposition or erosion? X g. The modification of any wash, channel, creek, river or lake? R:'~c~LANNING\SPORTSPR.IS 3121/94 ,dl YeS Maybe No Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mudslides, liquefaction, ground failure, or Similar hazards? Any development within an Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone? Will the proposal result in: Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? The creation of objectionable odors? Alteration of air movement, temperature, or moisture or any change in climate, whether locally or regionally? Water. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff?. c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to, temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? g. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions, withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? h. Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? i. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding? Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of any native species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)? X X X X X X X X X X X R:~PLANNING%SPORTSPR.IS 3121194 edl 2 Yes Maybe 10. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, threatened, or endangered species of plants? __ c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area of native vegetation, or in a barrier w the normal replenishment of existing species? -- d. Reduction in the acreage of any agricultural crop? ' _ Animal Life. Will the proposal Iesnit in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (animals includes all land animals, birds, reptiles, fish, amphibians, shellfish, benthie organisms, and/or'insects)? __ b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, threatened, or endangered species of animalS? __ c. The introduction of new wildlife species into an area? __ d. A barrier to the migration or movement-of animals? __ e. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? __ Noise. Will the proposal result in: a. Increases in existing noise levels? X b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? X c. Exposure of people to severe vibrations? X Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce or result in light or glare? X Land Use. Will the proposal result in: a. Alteration of the present land use of an area? X b. Alteration to the future planned land use of an area as described hl a COmmUnity Or general plan? __ Natural Resources. Will the proposal result hi: a. An increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? X b. The depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? X Risk of Upset. Will the proposal result in: X X X X X X X X X R:~:q,.ANNING\SPORTSPR. IS 3121/94 sdl 3 Ye~ Maybe No 11. 12. 13. 14. a. A risk of an explosion or the release of any hazardous substances in the event of an accident or upset conditions (hazardous substances includes, but is not limited W, pesticides, chemicals, oil or radiation)? b. The use, swrage, transport or disposal of any hazardous or toxic materials (including, but not limited to oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation)? c. Possible interference with an emergency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan? Population. Will the proposal alter the location, disu-ibution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing or create a demand for additional housing? Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? c. Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems, including public transportation? d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicycl ists or pedestrians? Public Services. Will the proposal have substantial effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? b. Police protection? c. Schools? d. Parks or other recreational facilities? e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? X X X X X X X X X X R:'~PLANNING\SPORTSPR.IS 3121/94 sdl 4 YP.~ f. Other governmental services: __ 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? __ b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources or energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? __ 16. Utililies. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to any of the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? __ b. Commullications systems? __ c. Water systems? -- d. Sanitary sewer systems or septic tanks? __ e. Storm water drainage systems? X f. Solid waste disposal sys.tems? __ g. Will the proposal result in a disjointed or inefficient pattern of utility delivery system improvements for any of the above? __ 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in: a. The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? __ b. The exposure of people to potential health hazards, including the exposure of sensitive receptors (such as hospitals and schools) to toxic pollutant emissions? __ 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in: a. The obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public? _ b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? __ c. Detrimental visual impacts on the surrounding area? __ 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recrealional resources or oppornmities? X 20. Cultural Resources. Will the proposal result in: Maybe NO X X X X X X X X X X X X R:~'t. ANN|NG~.~PORTSPR. IS 3/21/94 edl ,~ YeS MaYbe No C, The alteration or destruction of any paleontologic, prehistoric, archaeological or historic site? Adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehisWric or historic building, structure, or object?. Any potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? Restrictions to existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? X X X X R:~i:q..ANNINGXSPORTSPR.IS 3121/94 sdl (~ -qI. DISCUSSION OF THE ENVIRO~AL I1VIPACTS 1.a. 1.b. No. The proposal will not result in unstable earth conditions or changes in geologic subsumctures. The park will not require significant mounts of grading. Any unstable conditions will be mitigated through planting of slopes for erosion control (that is consistent with Uniform Building Code Standards and Ordinance No. 457) and through proper compaction of the soils. Consmxction and grading for this development will not be at depths which would affect any geologic substructures. No impacts are foreseen as a result of this project. - Yes. The proposal will result in the disruption, displacement, compaction, or overcovering of the soil. All grading activity requires disruptions, displacements, compaction and overcovering of the soil. The mount of disruption, displacement, compaction and overcovering of the soil will be the ralnimum mount needed to realize the project. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 1.C. Yes. The proposal will result in a change in the site topography and ground surface relief features. Although a majority of the site is relatively flat, a portion of the slope located at the southern portion of the site will be graded. Only the mlnlmllm amount of grading necessary to create the buildable area will be conducted. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 1.d. No. The proposal will not result in the destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features. No unique geologic features exist on the site. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 1 .e,f. Yes. Development of the site will result in increased wind and water erosion of soils both on and off-site and in changes in siltation, deposition, and erosion. Grading will occur during the construction phase for the project. The potential for wind and water erosions of soil will increase from the creation of manufactured slopes. Short-term impacts will be mitigated through grading techniques that are consistent with Air Quality regulations and best grading practices. Long-term impacts will be mitigated through site landscaping and the construction of hardscape. Erosion control measures will be implemented as a condition of approval for the-project and will have to be consistent with Unifom Building Code Standards and Ordinance No. 457. This will ensure that no significant impacts arise as a result of this project. 1.g. Yes. The proposal will result in minor modifications the existing drainage channel bsnk-~. The project will not result in modifications to any wash, creek, river or lake since none are located on the site. The channel currently traverses the site and will be slightly modified to accommodate the project. Prior to any modification to the channel, clearances will need to be obtained from the Army Corps of Engineers and the California Department of Fish and Game. This will assure that any potential impacts are mitigated to a level less than significant. The projea will not result in modifications to any w.ash, creek, river or lake since none are proximate to the site. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 1.h. Yes. Development of the site will expose people and property to earthquake hazards because the project is located in Southern California, an area which is seismically active. Any potential impacts will be mitigated through building construction which is consistent with Unifom Building Code R:~q, ANNING\SPORTSPR. IS 3121/94 sdl 7 1. i. Air 2.a,b. 2.c. Water 3.a. 3.b. 3.c. 3.d. 3.e. standards and proper ground compaction. The project will not expose people or property to geologic hazards such as landslides, mudslides, ground failure or liquefaction. No known landslides are located on the site or proximate to the site. The same is true for mudslides. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. No. The proposal does not include development within an Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone as identified by the State of California, Resource Agency Deparunent of Conservation Special Studies Zone Map. Therefore, no significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. Yes. The project will result in air emissions and deterioration of ambient air quality in the short- run. Air emissions and objectionable odors will occur during the construction phase of the project. These impacts will be of short duration and are not considered significant. There will be no air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality in the long run. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. No. The project will not result in alterations of air movement, temperature, or moisture, or in any change in climate either locally or regionally. The scale of the project precludes it from creating any significant impacts on the environment in this area. Yes. The proposal will result in changes to currents, to the course or direction of water movements in fresh waters. Reference response No. 1 .g. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. Yes. The proposal will result in changes to absorption rates, drainage patterns and the rate and amount of surface runoff. Previously permeable ground will be rendered .impervious by construction of buildings, accompanying harriscape and driveways. While absorption rates and surface runoff will change, impacts are mitigated through site design. Drainage conveyances will be required which will safely and adequately handle any of the runoff which is created by the realization of the project. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. No. The proposal will not resuk in alterations to the course or flow of flood waters. -The project is not located adjacent to the one hundred and five hundred year flood plain and is not located within an identified floodway. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. Yes. The proposal will result in a change in the amount of surface water in any waterbody. Landscaping on site will allow a significant mount of the water to drain into the ground. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. Yes. The proposal will result in discharges into surface waters or in any alteration of surface water quality. Prior to issuance of a grading permit for the project, the developer will be required to comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Con~ol Board. No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent has been fried or the project is shown to be exempt. By complying with the NPDES requirements, any potential impacts can be mitigated to a level less than significant. R:%PLANNING\SPORTSPR. IS 3121/94 edl 8 3.f. 3.g. 3.h. 3.i. Therefore, no significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this projea. No. The proposal will not result in an alteration of the direction or rate of flow of groundwaters. Construction on the site will not be at depths sufficient to have a significant impact on ground waters. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. No. The proposal will not result in a change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions, withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations. Reference response 3 .f. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. No. The project will not result in the reduction in the mount of water otherwise available for public water supplies. Water service will ultimately be provided by Rancho California Water District (RCWD) upon completion of financial arrangements between RCWD and the City. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. , No. The proposal will not expose people or property W water related hazards such as flooding. Reference responses 3.c. and 3.d. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. Plant Life 4.a. 4.b. 4.c. 4.d. No. The proposal will not result in a change to the diversity of species, or number of any native species of plants. The project is considered in-fill, with development surrounding it on all sides. In addition, the majority of the site being previously graded and subsequently improved. A small portion of the site will require additional grading;' however, it has also been previously disturbed. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. No. The proposal will not result in a reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, threatened, or endangered species of plants. Reference response 4.a. No. Development of the site will not result in the creation of a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species. Reference response 4.a. No. The proposal will not result in a reduction in the acreage of any agricultural crop. The City of Temecula Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) identifies the site as farmland of local imponce. The project is considered in-fill, and impacts from the loss of this land as farmland of local imponce is not seen as significant because the probability of it being used in this capacity is extremely low. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. Animal Life 5 .a.b.d.e. No. The project will not result in a change in the diversity of species, or numbers of species of animals. The project site lies within the Riverside County Stephens Kangaroo Rat Habitat Conservation Plan Preliminary Study Area. The project itself will not impact the habitat of the Stephens Kangaroo R~t (SKR) because the area is not a pan of the hiswric habitat of the SKR. The site has some development already. The project is considered "inf-tll" with development existing to the north, east and west. There is no potential for the change in the diversity and number (reduction) of the species, or in producing a barrier to the migration of Stephens Kangaroo Rat as well as to the deterioration of its habitat within the project area. SKR Mitigation Fees are not R:~PLANNINGXSPORTSPR.I$ 3/21/94 .dl required for the development of parcels used by local governmental entities (as per Section 10(e) of Ordinance No. 663). No other sensitive species have been identified upon the site. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 5.c. No. The proposal will not result in the introduction of any new wildlife species into the area. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. Noise 6.a. Yes. The proposal will result in increases to existing noise levels. A tot lot currently exists on the site with a portion of the site being utilized for parking. The project proposes to expand the park use to include a roller hockey arena, a skate park, a concession/rest room facility, a parking lot and a picnic area. The roller hockey arena is anticipated to be operational during the hours of 10:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. The skate park facility is anticipated to be operational during the hours of 12:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. (Sunday through Thursday) and between 12:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. on Friday and Saturday. They are not anticipated to create noise levels above those already generated by the ball fields and the Community Recreation Center that located to the west of the project site. In addkion, homes located to the north of the site are buffered by Rancho Vista Road and a landscaped slope. Temecula Valley High School is located to the east and is quite a distance form the project (beyond Margarita Road). The area to the south of the project is owned by the City of Temecula and is vacant. No significant impacts from noise are anticipated as a result of this , project. 6.b. Yes. The project will expose people to severe noise levels during the development/construction phase. Construction machinery is capable of producing noise in the range of 100+ DBA at 100 feet which is considered very nnnoying and can cause hearing damage from steady 8-hour exposure. This source of noise will be of short duration and therefore will not be considered significant. No significant impacts are anticipated either in the short- or long-run. 6.c. Yes. The proposal will result in the exposure of people to severe vibrations during the development/construction phase. The vibrations will be of short duration and therefore are not considered significant. No significant impacts are anticipated either in the short or long run. Lil'ht and Glare · Yes. The proposal will ultimately produce and result in light/glare, because development of the site will include new light sources. All light and glare has the potential to impact the Mount Palomar Observatory and surrounding development. The project is required to be consistent with Ordinance No. 655 (Ordinance Regulating Light Pollution). No impacts are foreseen from light and glare. Land Use 8.a. Yes. The proposal wili alter the present land use of the area; however, this alteration will be minor because the site is currently being utilized as a park. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 8.b. No. The proposal will not result in an alteration to the future plnnned land use of the site as R:~:~LANNING',SPORTSPR.IS 3121/94 ,.dl 10 described City's General Plan. The General Plan land Use designation for the site is Public/Institutional Facilities. The General Plan states: "The public and institutional facilities designation is intended for a wide range of public and private uses." The park is considered a public use. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. Natural Resources 9.a,b. Yes. The proposal will result in an increase in the rate of use of any natural resource or the depletion of any nonrenewable resource. Development of the site will result in an increase in the rate of use of natural resources (construction materials, fuels for the daily operation, asphalt, lumber) and the subsequent depletion of these non-renewable natural resources. Due to the scale of the proposed development, these impacts are not seen as significant. Risk of Upset 10. a,b. No. The proposal will not result in a risk of explosion, or the release of any hazardous substances in the event of an accident or upset conditions, since none are proposed in the request. The same is true for the use, storage, transport or disposal of any hazardous or toxic materials. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. lO.c. No. The project will not interfere with an emergency response plan or an emergency evaluation plan. The subject site is not located in an area which could impact an emergency response plan. The project will take access from maintained streets (IViargarita and Rancho Vista Roads) and will therefore not impede any emergency response or emergency evacuation plan-~. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. Population 11. No. The project will not result in altering the location, distribution, density or growth rate of the human population of the area. Projects of this nature do not cause people to relocate. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. Homing 12. No. Reference response 11. Projects of this nature do not cause people to relocate, and therefore, additional housing needs will not be created. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. Transportation/Circulation 13.a. No. The proposal will not result in the generation of substantial additional vehicular movement. The site is currently used as a park and this use will be continued. The roller hockey arena and the skate park compo.nents will not result in the generation of substantial additional vehicular movement since it these uses will be primarily drop-off or reached on foot during off-peak hours. No significant impacts are expected from development of the site. 13 .b. Yes. The project will result in an increased demand for new parking. Three hundred (300) parking spaces will be provided on site as a result of this project. This exceeds the mount R:~q_ANNING~SPORTSPR.IS 3121/94 ,dl 11 required under Ordinance No. 348; however, the additional parking spaces will benefit the remainder of the Sports Park site. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 13 .c. No. The proposal will not create impacts upon existing transportation systems, including public transportation. All of the streets surrounding the project have been improved to their ultimate full- width. A Riverside Tran-~it Agency'(RTA) route is currently available along Rancho Vista Road. The project is not anticipated to impact RTA's level of service. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 13 .d. No. The proposal will not result in alterations to present panems of circulation or movement of people and/or goods. The site is curren~y developed as a park and is accessed from streets that are already developed to their ultimate right-of-way. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 13.e. No. The proposal will not result in alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic since none exists currently in the proximity of the site and none are proposed. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 13 .f. Yes. The proposal will result in an increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians. Although the site will be developed more intensely than what currently exists, the traffic hazards will not increase greatly above the current conditions. These current condkions are typical conditions that exist at any interface between pedestrians, bicyclists and auwmobiles. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. Public Services 14.a,b. No. The proposal will not have a substantial effect upon, or resuk in a need for new or altered fire or police protection. The park facilkies will incrementally increase the need for fire and police protection, however, due to the scale of the proposed development, these impacts are not seen as significant. 14.c. No. The proposal will not have a substantial effect upon or result in a need for new or altered school facilities. Projects of this nature generally do not have effects upon the need for school facilities. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 14.d. No. The proposal will not have a substantial effect upon or result in a need for new or altered parks or other recreational facilities. The project will be beneficial to the City of Temecula as a whole because it will result in the enhancement of an existing park site. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 14.e. Yes. The proposal will result in a need for the maintenance of public facilities, including roads. Funding for maintenance of roads is derived from the Gasoline Tax which is distributed to the City of Temecula from the State of California. Impacts to current and future needs for maintenance of roads as a result of development of the site are incremental, are not considered significant. This is because the Gasoline Tax is sufficient to cover any of the proposed expenses. 14.f. No. The proposal will not have a substantial affect upon or result in a need for new or altered governmental services. The City of Temecula Community Services District will oversee the R:~LANNING\SPORTSPR.IS 3/21/94 edl 12 Energy 15.a. 15.b. Utilities 16.a 16.b. 16.c. 16.d. 16.e. 16.f. operations of the park. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. No. The proposal will not result in the use of substantial mounts of fuel or energy. As mentioned in responses 9.a. and 9.b. the proposal may result in an increase in the rate of use of any natural resource or the depletion of any nonrenewable resource. Development of the site will result in an increase in the rate of use of natural resources (construction materials, fuels for the daily operation, asphalt, lumber) and the subsequent depletion of these non-renewable natural resources. Due to the scale of the proposed development, these impacts are not seen as significant. No. The project will not result in a substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, nor will the project require the development of new sources of energy. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. No. The proposal will not result in a need for new systems or substantial alterations to power or natural gas. The project site is within proximity of existing facilities. Development exists to the north, west and east of the site and these services are already provided to them. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. No. The proposal will not result in a need for new systems or substantial alterations to communication systems (reference response No. 16.a.). No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. No. The proposal will not result in a need for new systems or substantial alterations to water systems. As mentioned in response 3.h., water service will ultimately be provided by Rancho California Water District CRCWD) upon completion of financial arrangements between RCWD and the City of Temecula. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. No. The proposal will not result in a need for new systems or substantial alterations to sanitary sewer systems. The project is located within Eastern Municipal Water District's (EMWD) sanitary sewer service area. Information contained in the. General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report (Certified November 9, 1993) states that adequate facilities exist (and are proposed) which will adequately service the projecL No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. Yes. The proposal will result in a need for new systems or substantial alterations to on-site storm water drainage systems. The proposal will result in changes to absorption rates, drainage patterns and the rate and mount of surface ranoff. Previously permeable ground will be rendered impervious by construction of buildings, accompanying bardscape and driveways. While absorption rates and surface runoff will change, impacts are mitigated through site design. Drainage conveyances will be re. quired which will safely and adequately handle any of the runoff which is created by the realization of the project. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. No. The proposal will not result in a need for new systems or substantial alterations to solid waste disposal systems. Any potential impacts from solid waste created by this development can be R:%PLANNING~SPORTSPR. IS 3121/94 rail 13 mitigated through participation in any Source Reduction and Recycling Prograrn.~ which are implemented by the City. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 16.g. No. The proposal will not result in a disjointed or inefficient pattern of utility delivery system improvements for any of the above. (reference response No. 16.a.). No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. Human Health 17.a,b. No. The proposal will not result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard. Projects of this nature do not result in the creation of health hazards or potential health hazards. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. Aesthetics 18.a. No. The proposal will not result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public. None exist on site, nor are any proximate to the site. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 18.b. No. The proposal will not result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view. The site is curren~y an undeveloped area within the Sports Park. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 18.c. No. The proposal will not result in detrimental visual impacts on the surrounding area. As mentioned in response 18.b., the site is currently an undeveloped area within the Sports Park. The uses that are being proposed {a roller hockey arena, a concession/rest room facility, skate park, group picnic area and parking lot) are typical uses that are expected to be located in a Sports Park. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. Recreation 19. Yes. The proposal will result in positive impacts to the quality or quantity of existing recreational resources or opportunities. The site. is currently used as a park site and this site will be enhanced via the plan. More recreational facilities will be developed on this site to serve the Commxlnity. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. Cultural Resources 20.a.b. Maybe. The proposal may result in the alteration or destruction of any paleontologic, prehistoric, archaeological or historic site or structure. The site has been previously disturbed. The City General Plan identified this area as an "Area of Sensitivity for Archaeological Resources". Any future impacts will be mitigated through the application of standard City paleontologic and archaeologic development conditions. In addition, if needed, onsite archaeologic and Native American heritage res6urce experts will monitor activities on the site." No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 20.c. No. The project will not have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values. No "unique" ethnic cultural values exist on-site or in proximity to the site. R:~PLANNING~SPORTSPR.IS 3/21194 sdl 14 20.d. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. No. The proposal will not result in restrictions to existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area. None curren~y exist on the site. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. R:~,PLANNING~SPORTSPR.IS 3121/94 edl 15 IV. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE Does the project have the potential to either: degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish, wildlife or bird species, cause a fish, wildlife or bird population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plat, bird or animal species, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? Ye~ Maybe No X Does the project have the potential to achieve short term, to the disadvantage of long term, environmental goals? (A short term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long term impacts will endure well into the future.) X Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but CUmulatively considerable? (A project's impact on two or more separate resources may be relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) X Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? X V. DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME "DE ~S" IMPACT FINDINGS Does the project have the potential to cause any adverse effect, either individually or cumulatively, on fish and wildlife resources? Wildlife is defined as "all wild animals, birds, plants, fish, amphibians, and related ecological communities, including the habitat upon which the wildlife depends on for it's continued viability" (Section 711.2, Fish and Game Code). Yes X No.. R:%PLANNING\SPORTSPR.IS 3/21/94 sdl 16 ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because the Mitigation Measures described on the attached sheets and in the Conditions of Approval that have been added to the project will mitigate any potentially significant impacts to a level of insignificance, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. X I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. · repared by: Name~d Title - - Date R:~oLANNINGXSPORTSPRJS 312'U9~, ,dl 17 ITEM NO. 8 APPROVAL CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: Board of Directors Ronald E. Bradley, General Manager DATE: SUBJECT: PREPARED BY: April 26, 1994 Temecula Town Association Lease of the Northwest Sports Complex Herman D. Parker, Recreation Superintendent ~ RECOMMENDATION: The Board of Directors: Approve lease agreement between the City of Temecula and the Temecula Town Association for the use of the Northwest Sports Complex. DISCUSSION: The City of Temecula Community Services Department is proposing to enter a Lease Agreement with the Temecula Town Association (TTA). This Lease Agreement will enable the TTA to use the Northwest 'Sports Complex to hold their annual Golden Harvest Month events which 'includes the Great Temecula Tractor Race, the Bruce Brill Memorial Chili Cook-Off and other activities between August 5th and November 5th of each year for the next three (3) years. The Lease Agreement would commence August 5, 1994 and terminate on November 5, 1996and may be extended by mutual agreement between both parties for up to one (1) year. The proposed Agreement was reviewed and approved by the Community Services Commission on April 11,1994. The Temecula Town Association will be required to pay user fees in compliance with the City of Temecula's Fee Schedule - Resolution No. 93-97. These fees will be determined and assessed after the Temecula Town Association has completed and submitted the required Facility Use form. A copy of the proposed lease agreement is attached for your review. FISCAL IMPACT: Fees collected from the use of this facility will be used to off-set the cost of repairs and upkeep by the Community Services Department. CITY OF TEME~ NORTHWEST SPORTSPARK CONCESSION LEASE This Concession Lease ("Lease") is made and entered into by and between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation ("City") and the Temecula Town Association, a California non-profit corporation ("TTA ") as of April _, 1994. WHEREAS, the City and 7FA desire to enter into this Lease to provide the terms and conditions upon which T'FA will operate various special events, collectively known as Golden Harvest Month at the Northwest Sports Park (the "Park"). NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above recitals, and of the mutual covenants, conditions and undenaldngs set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. Grant of Lease. City hereby lets to 'ITA and TTA hereby leases from City the real property, hereinafter referred to as the "Premises", described on Exhibit A, on the terms and conditions and for the uses hereinafter specified, including, without limitation, the exercise by TTA of the concession rights granted in Section 4. The Premises are located in the Park. Exhibit A includes a layout plan and legal description of the Premises and the Park, and includes a description of the improvements owned by the City, and included in the Lease to TTA. 2. Use Permits. This Lease is not in lieu of obtaining a Use Permit or Minor Outdoor Event Permit. TFA agrees to procure all permits and licenses requested by the City of Temecula to conduct special events and to comply with all governmental rules, regulations, statutes and ordinances. TrA agrees to pay all facility use fees applicable to its Use Permit, as established pursuant to Section 26 of City Ordinance No. 93-19 and Resolution 93-97. TTA may obtain a temporary Alcoholic Beverage Control License for use of the property, subject to any conditions imposed in the Special Events Permit. A Community Service Department "Facility Use" form listing the exact dates of use is also required by June 15th of each year. 3. Term. This Lease shall commence August 5, 1994, and terminate on November 5, 1996, and may be extended by mutual agreement between both parties for up to one (1) year, with the Director of Community Services (the "Director") acting on behalf of the City. TrA may utilize the Premises only between the dates of August 5 and November 5 of each calendar year. This Lease may be terminated by either party by providing one hundred and eighty (180) days written notice. 4. Concession Rights Granted. Except as specifically provided hereinafter to the contrary, TrA shall have the exclusive right and obligation to use the Premises during the lease period for recreational, entertainment, artistic and cultural activities, and the reasonably necessary office and storage purposes connected therewith. TTA shall not use the Premises for any other purpose without the prior consent of the Director. The attractions being offered by TYA shall include, but not be limited to the Great Temecula Tractor Race, the Temecula Professional Rodeo Cowboy Association Rodeo, the Bruce Brill Memorial Chili Cookoff and other related activities. Not later than ninety (90) calendar days before TEA's first scheduled event for each calendar year, TEA shall provide the Director with a schedule of all events. Should the Director object to the schedule, the Director shall notify TEA of such objections within ten (10) days. TEA shall promp~y respond to Director's objections and set forth a plan to mitigate and resolve the objections to the satisfaction of the Director. 5. Fixtures. The Premises has been improved with: (i) 3/4 inch water pipes, including valves and faucets; (ii) phone lines; and (iii) light poles and lights. These fixtures are the property of the City. City will provide these fixtures to TEA in good working order prior to August 5 of each year. TEA may use these fixtures, and will be responsible for maintaining and repairing said fixtures during the period it uses the Premises. 6. Limitations on Use of Premises. TEA shall not interfere with the use and enjoyment of the portion of the Park outside the Premises. 7. TEA Officers. Employees. Agents and Volunteers. TEA will use its best efforts to insure that its officers, employees, agents and volunteers shall at all times conduct themselves in a professional manner and that they will conform to all applicable ordinances and regulations now applicable to the Park, as well as all ordinances and regulations which may be adopted by the City. In the event of any conflict of between this Lease and the Park ordinances and regulations, the Park ordinance and regulations shall control. TEA shall maintain a staff adequate to operate and administer all facilities located on the Premises in a safe and orderly manner. TEA agrees upon due cause being shown, to take reasonable disciplinary action against its officers, employees, agents and volunteers. 8. Merchandise. TEA agrees to sell merchandise and provide services that are of good quality and condition. City retains the right to require TEA to discontinue sale or use of those items the Director reasonably determines are not acceptable, upon five (5) days written notice by the Director. For sales tax purposes, the point of sale for all food, merchandise, admission tickets, and services shall be the Park. 9. Third Party Agreements. TEA may, in conjunction with the operation of the Premises, enter into agreements with third parties concerning, among other things, advertising and signage at the Premises, operation of the concessions, and sale of food, beverage, and concession items at the Premises. All such third party agreements shall be subject to the terms and conditions of this Lease. The City reserves the right to review any and all such third party agreements entered into by 'IrA for compliance with the tens of this Lease. All contracts with such third parties shall clearly provide that this Lease controls all a~-'tivities of such persons on the Premises. Additionally, all contracts with such third parties shall contain insurance provisions to protect the City which are ac, c~table to the City and which are substantially similar to the provisions of Section 16. 10. Security and Traffic Management Plan. TTA shall be responsible for providing. security and managing traffic in all areas of the Premises under its exclusive control. IrA shall prepare a Security and Traffic Management Plan ('Security and Traffic Management Plan') setting forth the parking and traffic plans to be used to hold any authorized event at the Premises. The Security and Traffic Management Plan shall be prepared and delivered to the Director not later than ninety (90) days prior to the first event for each calendar year. TrA shall be responsible and properly handle all waste produced during any and all events on the Premises. The Director shall notify TrA of the Director's comments with respect to the Security and Traffic Management Plan within thirty (30) days of the Director's receipt of the Plan. Should the Director object to the Plan, IrA shall promp~y respond to the Director's objections and set forth a plan to mitigate or resolve the objections to the reasonable satisfaction of the Director. 11. Disorderly Persons. IrA shall permit no apparently intoxicated persons, profane or indecent language, or boisterous or loud conduct in or about the Premises and will call upon the aid of peace officers to assist and maintain in the 'Premises peaceful conditions. 12. Emergency Aid. IrA shall provide and staff an Emergency Aid Station consistent with the size of the crowds for all of IrA's events on the Premises to provide emergency medical aid to all persons on the Premises. All persons staffing the Emergency Aid Station shall, at a minimum, be currently certified in first aid and CPR. 13. Damage Provisions. IrA shall pay for the repair and/or replacement of all' damaged structures, equipment and facilities in areas occupied or used by IrA which are damaged through any act of IrA, its officers, employees, agents, volunteers, subcontractors, and persons attending or participating in any IrA event. This Section applies to, but is not limited to such items as exterior fencing, structures, drinking fountains, water spigots, irrigation equipment, trash cans, landscaping, including tuff, trees, scrubs and any other facilities, improvements or equipment on the Premises. 14. Liens. TrA shall not directly or indirectly, create or pennit to be created or to remain, and will promptly discharge, at its expense, any mortgage, lien, encumbrance, charge, or pledge of the Premises or fixtures or furnishings, or any pan thereof. 15. Improvements. Repairs and Maintenance. TFA shall make no substantial alteration or repair to the Premises without the prior consent of the Director, including but not limited to grading, carpentry, electrical, sewer, paving and painting. TI'A shall, at its sole cost and expense, repair and maintain in good order all utility lines inside the Premises. 16. Return of the Premises. Upon the termination of this Lease, TrA shall return the Premises in as good as condition and repair as the Premises now are or shall hereafter be put, reasonable wear and tear excepted. 17. Indemnity and Insurance. A. Liability. City shall not be liable for any loss, damages, or injury to person or property of any person occasioned by or arising out of any act of TTA or of anyone holding under TFA; nor the occupancy or use of the Premises or any part thereof by or under TrA; nor directly or indirectly from any state or condition of said Premises or any part thereof during the term of this Lease. B. Hold Harmless Agreement. TI'A shall defend, indemnify, and hold City and its officers, agents, volunteers, and employees harmless from any and all damages arising out of any act or omission of TrA, its officers, employees, agents subcontractors, volunteers and persons attending TrA events on the Premises, except as the same may arise from the City's sole negligence, gross negligence, recklessness, or intentional misconduct (or that of City's agents or employees). ** C. Liability Insurance. T'FA agrees to procure and maintain a policy or policies of comprehensive general liability and property damage insurance for the benefit of IrA and City, in mounts not less than that set forth below; and under and by the terms of which, are protected from and insured against any and all loss, damage or liability of whatsoever nature, arising out of any act or omission of IrA, its employees, agents, subcontractors, volunteers and persons attending TFA events on the Premises. The limits of liability on any policy of public liability and property damage shall be at least One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) combined single limit for bodily injury and property damage, including Liquor Liability. Additionally, IrA shall carry sufficient Fire Liability insurance for the benefit of City to cover replacement value of the permanent structures within the Premises as well as City owned contents thereof. The deductible on said policies shall not be more than Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000.00). D. Workers' Compensation. A program of workers' compensation insurance or a State-approved Serf Insurance Program in an amount and form to meet all applicable requirements of the Labor Code of the State of California, including Employer's Liability with $1,000,000 limits, covering all employees of TEA and all risks to such persons under this Lease. E. Evidence of Coverage. TEA shall deliver to City within ninety (90) calendar days of the first special event of each calendar year, a certified copy of the insurance policy or policies and all endorsements procured by TEA under the terms hereof. Prior to occupying the Premises, or any pan of it, TEA shall deliver certificates of the coverage from the insurance, which certificates shall, among other things, name the company writing the same, and list the policy number, amount of coverage, and provisions thereof. arising in provided. Premium Payments. TEA shall pay any and all premiums or other expenses connection with the furnishing of the insurance required by TEA as herein G. Additional Named Insured. Except for Workers' Compensation Insurance, City shall be an additional named insured under said policy or policies of insurance. TEA shall maintain in full force from August 5 to November 5 of each calendar year all insurance required under this Lease. TEA shall provide all required evidence of such insurance no later than July 1 of each year. TEA shall be required to inform City of any change, expiration or renewal of any insurance policy or policies at least thirty (30) calendar days prior to the effective date of change. Further, each policy shall provide the same shall not be eanceled until a thirty (30) calendar day written notice of cancellation has been mailed to the City. All insurance policies required hereunder shall contain language to the effect that (i) the insurer waives the right of subrogation against City and against any and all of the City's officers, agents, volunteers, and employees, and (ii) the policies are primary and non- contributing with any insurance that may be carried by City. H. Cancellation of Insurance. In the event City receives a thirty (30) calendar day written notice of cancellation concerning any of the required policies, or should TEA fail to have in effect the required coverage at any time during this Lease, City may give notice to TEA to reinstate or acquire the affected coverage, and TTA shall not conduct any events on the Premises until all required insurance is in effect. Should TrA fail to reinstate or acquire the affected coverage within five (5) days of City's notice to reinstate or acquire such coverage, City may reinstate or acquire the affected coverage, and TEA shall reimburse City for the necessary cost. If 'IrA does not reimburse City within ten (10) days after demand by City, City shall have the right to invoice TTA and TEA shall be responsible for paying said amount. I. General Insurance Provisions. 1. All insurance provided for under this Section shall be annually reviewed by the Director for the purpose of increasing the minimum limits of such insurance to amounts which may be reasonable and customary for similar facilities of like size and operation. 2. All insurance heroin provided for under this Section shall be effected under policies issued by insurers of recognized responsibility licensed or permitted to do business in the State, rated Best's at A-7 or better, and approved by the City Risk Manager. 3. Any insurance required to be maintained by TrA pursuant to this Section may be taken out under a blanket insurance policy or policies covering other premises or properties, and other insureds in addition to the Parties hemto. Any such policy or policies of blanket insurance shall specify therein, or supplemental written certification from the insurance allocated to the coverage to be provided under this Section and provided further, that in all other respects, any such blanket policy shall comply with the other provisions of this Section. 18. Assignment and Subletting. TrA shall not assign its interest in this Lease or in the Premises to any person or entity without first obtaining the Director's consent. Any assignment or sublease without the Director's 'consent shall be voidable and, at the Director's election, shall constitute adofault. No consent of the Director should be required for agreements with vendors, concessionaires and advertisers at the Premises, or booking or other performance agreements with entertainers. 19. Default and Ri~,ht to Terminate. A. If TTA should fail to perform, keep or observe any of the terms, conditions or covenants as set forth in this Lease, City shall give 'IrA notice to correct the failure within said thirty (30) days, and if such action is not cured by TrA within thirty (30) day period, TTA shall be in default of this Lease and TrA's rights hereunder shall at the option of the City, be terminated and forfeited. Such election to terminate shall not be construed as a waiver of any claim the City may have against TTA, consistent with such termination. 1. If, however, any failure is of such nature that it cannot be physically remedied within thirty (30) days, and if TrA hall have commenced the elimination of such failure promptly after the receipt of such notice, and shall continuously and diligently proceed in good faith to eliminate such default, then the period for correction shall be extended for such length of time as is reasonably necessary to complete such correction. 2. Upon any termination of this 1.ease, TrA covenants and agrees to surrender and to forfeit this Lease, and deliver up the Premises peaceably to the City immediately upon any such termination. If said TTA shall remain in possession of said Premises after any termination of this Lease, IrA shall be deemed guilty of an unlawful detention of the Premises. B. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Lease to the contrary, the City shall not be deemed to be in default until ~firty (30) days after notice of default is given by the TrA to the City. ff such default cannot be cured within such thirty day period, the City shall not be deemed to be in default provided that, within such thirty (30) day period, the City shall commence and thereafter diligently prosecute efforts to cure the default. 20. Temecula MotorSports Park. TTA acknowledges that City is a party to a Agreement, dated May 17, 1993, with Donald Shoemaker doing business as the Temecula Motorsports Park CShoemakerD. Pursuant to the Shoemaker Agreement, City has granted to Shoemaker certain specific rights with respect to the Park. TTA acknowledges that from the commencement date hereof through term of the Shoemaker Agreement, City is obligated to honor the terms and conditions of said Agreement. TrA agrees that it shall take no action which it knows or reason to believe will violate the terms of the Shoemaker Agreement. 21. Use. TFA agrees to maintain the property free and clear of garbage and debris and to permit only legal activities consistent with the staging of Golden Harvest Month. No dumping, storage of hazardous or toxic waste, nor the maintenance of any nuisance, public or private shall be permitted rights across any contiguous parcels and TrA agrees to secure all such required access at its sole cost and expense. Any grading or stockpiling of dirt on the property must be approved by the City Engineer. 22. Storage. TTA may store on the Premises the bleachers, booth, announcers stands and waste bins necessary and appropriate to the staging of Golden Harvest Month activities from the date of this Lease through November 5, 1996. The City may relocate this equipment when TTA is not using the Premises between November 5 and August 5 of each year, provided the City returns the equipment prior to August 5. 23. Utilities. City shall bill TTA for all utility costs between August 5th and November 5th for the duration of this Agreement. 24. Fencing. The City may require that the TEA, when not using the premises from November 5 to August 5 of each year, remove the fencing from the site and be responsible for any reinstallation of said fencing. 25. Noti~. All notices under this Agreement shall be made via United States First Class mail to the following: CITY OF TEMECULA 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 Attention: City Clerk THE TEMECULA TOWN ASSOCIATION P.O. Box 435 Temecula, CA 92590 Attention: Bill Harker 26. Attomey's Fees. In the event of any controversy related to the enforcement or interpretation of any term or condition of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attomey's fees and costs. 27. Entire Agreement. This Lease, and the documents attached hereW or mentioned herein, contain all of the agreements of the Parties hereto with respect to any matter covered or mentioned in this Lease, and no prior agreement or understanding pertaining to any such matter shall be effective for any purpose. 28. Amendments. No provision of this Lease may be amended or added to except by an agreement in writing. THE TEMECULA TOWN ASSOCIATION CITY OF TEMECULA By: Name: Title: By: Ron Roberts, Mayor ATTEST: By June Greek, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: By Scott F. Field, City Attorney ITEM NO. 9 DEPARTMENTAL REPORT APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY ~ FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: Board of Directors FROM: Ronald Bradley, General Manager DATE: April 26, 1994 SUBJECT: Departmental Report PREPARED BY: ~ Shawn D. Nelson, Director of Community Services DISCUSSION: The Community Services Commission discussed the installation of a memorial for Officer Kent Hintergardt to be placed in Kent Hintergardt Memorial Park. The Commission was extremely supportive of this idea, and staff is now in the process of designing the monument for this park. Paloma Del Sol Park is now being utilized for Adult Softball and Little League Baseball. The response by the youth and adult players to this facility has been excellent. The Community Recreation Center (CRC) Project is now open and has been greatly utilized by the community. Currently, many recreation classes, sports programs, and drop-in recreation programs are being offered, as well as cultural and theatrical performances in the multi-purpose room and the outdoor amphitheater. The swimming pool is expected to be open and operational in May, 1994. The firm of J.F. Davidson Associates INC., facilitated a public workshop regarding the skateboarding component of the Rancho California Sports Park Improvement Project on Monday, January 31,1994 at 7:00 p.m. at the Old Town Temecula Senior Center. Input was received in regards to skateboarding and roller hockey. A follow up meeting with the project committee was scheduled on March 1, 1994. As a result of this meeting, the Project Committee approved the master plan and forwarded it to the Community Services Commission on April 11, 1994. The Commission approved the master plan for this project, and this item will be considered by the Board of Directors on April 26, 1994. The construction of Riverton Park is now completed. It is anticipated that the 120 day maintenance period will end in April, 1994. The park will be dedicated to the community May 19, 1994. Staff has met with the Temecula Town Association to execute a lease agreement for the Northwest Sports Complex in the near future. This lease was approved by the Community Services Commission at the April 11,1994 Commission meeting. This item will be considered by the City Council on April 26, 1994. r:\a\agendae%deptOO6.ldn 041894 Staff is moving forward with the Loma Linda Park Project - Phase II. The plans are currently in for plan check and it is hoped that this project will be out to bid by the end of April, 1994. Staff is currently working on potential construction options concerning the Pala Community Park Project. During the past several weeks, test pumping occurred on the site to determine whether the underground water could be drawn down enough to allow equipment on the site for grading purposes. As a result of this process, it has been recommended by the soils engineer that a portion of the site can be developed using the de-watering process. Therefore, staff is recommending that the design plans be altered to accommodate phasing the project. An item to consider amending the design contract will be considered by the Board on April 26, 1994, and the new construction plan will be considered by the Board on May 10, 1994. Staff is currently interviewing for acluatics and day camp staff to provide summer recreation programs and activities. In addition, a summer concert schedule for the outdoor amphitheater is being prepared. Finally, the contract to provide a July 4th Fireworks Program will be considered by the Board on April 26, 1994. r:%a\agendae\deptOO6.$dn 041894 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ITEM 1 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY HELD MARCH 22, 1994 A regular meeting of the Temecula Redevelopment Agency was called to order at 9:12 PM. PRESENT: 5 AGENCY MEMBERS: Birdsall, Mur~oz, Roberrs, Stone, Parks ABSENT: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None Also present were Executive Director Ronald Bradley, General Counsel Scott F. Field and Agency Secretary June S. Greek. PUBLIC COMMENTS None given. AGENCY BUSINESS 1. Minutes 1.1 Approve the minutes of February 22, 1994; 1.2 Approve the minutes of March 8, 1994. 2. Aooroval of Funding Mechanism for Soecial Studies - Old Town Temecula Project Executive Director Ron Bradley presented the staff report, stating that staff introduced Mr. Buffman's proposal and explained the stipulated judgement amendment to the Redevelopment Advisory Committee last night. He stated the Committee expressed displeasure at receiving projects after the fact, and said in the future staff will bring these projects before the committee pri~r to action of the City Council. Mr. Bradley reported this is only an informational item and requires no formal action. The report was received and filed. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT Executive Director Bradley reported that at the meeting of April 5, 1994, a proposal will be forthcoming to hire a consultant to prepare the required low/moderate housing plan which conforms to RDA law. He announced the proposal. will include the training of in-house personnel to maintain and continue this work. P, DAM][H~032294 -1- 04114/94 Ternecula Redevelol~ment A~ency Minutes March 22. 1994 GENERAL COUNSEL'S REPORT None given. AGENCY MEMBER'S REPORT Agency Member Roberts reported he received a letter from Congressman Ron Packard, explaining rule changes with regard to sale of property to a public agency. The negotiations regarding the Rancho West Apartments will re-open in mid April. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Agency Member Stone, seconded by Agency Member Roberts to adjourn at 9:21 PM to a meeting on April 5, 1994 at 8:00 PM. The motion was unanimously carried. Ronald J. Parks, Chairperson ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk/Agency Secretary P, DAMIN\0322~I -2- 04114/94 ITEM NO. APPROVAL CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Executive Director/Redevelopment Agency Board Members Mary Jane McLarney, Finance Officer. April 26, 1994 Approval of RDA Commercial Small Business Loan RECOMMENDATION: That the Agency Members approve an RDA small business loan to A & K Communications. DISCUSSION: The City has received an application from A&K Communications for a loan in the amount of $29,000 over a 5 year term to finance the acquisition and/or repair of machinery or equipment. The business is owned by Marilyn Jean Avetta and Cynthia Ann Kelley and is located at 41743 Enterprise Circle No., Ste. 204, Temecula, CA 92590. This loan is in conformance with the criteria of the loan program and has been reviewed by our independent loan committee consisting of a local bank officer and a Certified Public Accountant. FISCAL IMPACT: To date the City has funded $80,400 of loans and has two loans approved but not yet funded pending execution of documents. ITEM NO. 3 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER ~ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Redevelopment Agency Board Members Ronald E. Bradley, Executive Director April 18, 1994 Authorization of Agreements for Consulting Services for Old Town T.Z.B.G., Inc., Redevelopment Project RECOMMENDATION: That the Redevelopment Agency authorize the Chairperson to execute an agreement with Tom Dodson and Associates not to exceed $78,500 subject to the approval of the Executive Director and the General Counsel as to the final form of the agreement. DISCUSSION: On March 22, 1994 an appropriation of $125,000 was authorized for the purpose of conducting feasibility studies as required by the Memorandum of Understanding between the City and Redevelopment Agency of Temecula and T.Z.B.G., Inc. (Zev Buffman). On April 5, 1994 a contract not to exceed $75,000 was authorized for a study of economic feasibility. The following centract is now required to complete the process. Environmental Impact RePOrt Tom Dodson and Associates will prepare an environmental impact report for a fee not to exceed $75,800. The EIR project is proposed to be completed within approximately six months. This schedule is subject to change based on environmental issues that may be added as a result of scoping sessions. The firm was selected based on their background and experience with similar projects and on the recommendation of Zev Buffman. In accordance with our Memorandum of Understanding, the consultant has been approved by T.Z.B.G., Inc., (Zev Buffman); T.Z.B.G., Inc., will be responsible for one-half of the fees. The scope of work for the firm is more fully described in the attached proposal. FISCAL IMPACT: Sufficient funds exist for the City's portion of the fees (one-half, not to exceed a total of $125,000). The balance will be billed to TZBG, Inc. Attachment: Tom Dodson & Associates Proposal TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES 463 N. SIERRA WAY SAN BERNARDINO, CA. 92410 (909) 884-9700 FAX (909) 889-8050 April 1, 1994 Mr. Ron Bradley City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 Dear Mr Bradley: On behalf of Tom Dodson & Associates (TDA), I would like to thank you and Mr. Zox; B.f-r'man for the opportunity to submit this proposal to assist the City of Temecula to comply with the California Environmemal Quality Act (CEQA) for entertainment projects designed to implement the Old Town Temecttla Specific Plan. In developing a scope of work to ensure compliance with the CEQA, I have reviewed the Specific Plan, the City General Plan and related documents that address the activities 'in the project area at a general level. Thi.q letter proposal outlines those tasks and the work effort that I believe will be necessary to ensure full compliance with the CEOA in'the shortest timeframe. Before proceeding with the proposal contents, it is appropriate to discuss the status of our information at the time this proposal is being prepared. We have not yet defined the specific scope of the environmental documentation that will be required to support a decision on the proposed project. This circum-~tance requires me to include a number of assumptions in the scope of work and the cost estimate that may need to be revised when the scope is finali,,ed in the near future. I have attempted to be conservative in my assumptions, but I expect we will have to make some adjustments to my contract immediately following completion of the Initial Study and NOtice of Preparation. Where appropriate, I have clearly stated assumptions in preparing thi_~ proposal. The final product of TDA's work effort, summarized below, will be a focused environmemal impact report (EIR) which can be used for individual project approvals as they are occur. In accordance with the State CEQA Guldelixtes, Sections 15153 and 15168, thl.~ EIR can be used by the City and developers as a program environmental document which provides the opportunity to mlnirniTe flitlife environmental reviews and/or to focus only on those new, specific project issues that my arise when a specific development under the Specific Plan is implemented. Given the City's decision to prepare an EIR, we believe that thi.q approach will be the most informative and efficient process for implementing the proposed project. The proposal that follows outlipes the specific tasks and subtasks .that will be performed to provide the EIR for the entertainment projects being proposed. The fees, schedule and other items follow the proposal text SCOPE OF WORK Task h Prepar~ Project Description Once authorized to proceed with thi,~ environmental document, TDA will review all of the information developed to date and prepare a project description with suffident detail that it can be used to prepare the Initial Study with full substantiation. Alternatives that will be considered in the EIR will be defined as part of tiffs effort. The project description will identify all proposed activities, location of individual entertainment facilities, proposed land uses, and type of activities at a level of detail commensurate with the current stage of pl---i-g. I will provide as much elaboration as poss~le to allow evaluation and forecast of environmental impacts. Graphics will be provided in support of the project description and I intend to rely upon Mr. Buffman and the City for some of the basic map materials. A total 30 hours is allocated to this tapir The project description is the deliverable product for this task. I have allocated ten hours to meetings with Staff and Mr. Buffman-on this task. The project description can be completed w~thln two weeks after authorization to proceed is received from the City . All work will be performed by TDA. · Task 2: Initial Study, Notice of Preparation, and Scoping Sessions ,~tcr reviewing the information provided to date by the City and Mr. Buffman, I have assumed that the EIR for this project may not have to address all of the 20 issues contained in the Cites Initial Study Environmental Chccidist Form. Some of the issues can be shown to bc non.~i~m~i~eant through preparation of a dctallcd Initial Study with extensive substantiation as proposed under thi_~ task. Therefore, TDA proposes to prepare an Initial Study with detailed substantiation for most cnviroumcntal issues. This 'Initial Study ~ rely upon existing technical data for the project area, interviews with utility and service system managers, and other rcaclgy available data sources pertinent to the proposed project. A draft of the Initial Study dill be completed and submitted to the City for review and comment Based on the comments from the City, the Initial Study v/dl be ~nalizcd and the issues that q-HI be addressed for this project EIR dill be identified. TDA dill work with the ~ to prepare and distribute the Notice of Preparation (NOP). The NOP ~ be trnn-~rnltted with the Ialitial Study and its findings to the interested public, partleularly the Old Town businesses and rcgulatory agendes. The final determination of issues that dill be addressed in the EIR wRl be made after receipt of co,-,~ents on the NOP and input during proposed scoping sessions, if the City wishes to hold such sessions. During the 30-day NOP review period I rcco,-,~cnd that the City hold both an agency and a public scoping meeting. The goal dill be to receive input directly from agency staff; such as South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) and the State Department of Ftsh and Game (DFG), and from the interested public regarding the issues of concan for the proposed project. TDA will participate in any role requested by the City in support of these gopilig meetillg.~ ran~n~ from compiling notes/minutes of meetings to raMring presentations. It is TDA's intent to proceed with preparation of the Draft EIR (DEIR) immediately following authorization to proceed with th;_~ project, but it vail not be completed until after receipt of NOP and scoping meeting issues have been compiled, evaluatcd and, where appropriate,, included in the scope of the DEIR. Any additional issues raised in NOP and scoping meeting comments dill be evaluated with the City for concurrence before including them in the scope of the EIR. This task dill be completed upon agreement with the City on the final scope of thc DI~-IR based on a joint rcvicw of comments and final content recommendations by City. 2 A total SO hours is allocated to thk task. The project description for this project will be uri|~7~-d as the basis for making impact forecasts as part of this task. TDA has allocated 12 hours to meetings with Staff and the applicant. The draft Initial Study can be completed within one week following completion of the project description. The completed Initial Study is the primary deliverable product under ~ task. The final scope of the Draft EIR will be determined within five days after receipt of the final NOP and scoping meeting comments. A memorandum identifying all environmental issues to be included in the DEIR will be the final work product delivered to the City under thk task. All work will be performed. by TDA. Task 3: Prepare Screencheck Draft EIR for Internal Review Under this task TDA will prepare the DEIR as an altrarive draft for internal review. The following subtasks will be completed: : Subtask 1: Develop the Environmental Setting Data Base Ut;l;~4ng the data generated specifically for this project, TDA will prepare the existing environmental setting for each of the issues being evaluated in the EIP.. I am assuming that the following environmental issues will require Ori~n~l data to be generated before they can bc fully addressed: traffic and circulation, biological resourcc~ cultural resources, noise, and air quality. Fees for preparing these technical reports for inclusion in the DEIR arc discussed at the end of this task discussion- It is anticipated that TI)A's effort for developing the environmental setting data base for thc EIR, including review and incorporation of the teehn;cal reports, will require approximately 80 hours. Subtask 2: Prepare the Environmental Impact Evaluation TDA will utilize thc data from the projca description and first subtask to forecast potential environmental impacts from developing and operatln5 the proposed entertainment facilities. The impact forecast will be as specific as possible for the proposed project and affected environanent Mitigation measures will be identified, as appropriate, for each environmental issue with potenriMly significant impacts. The impact analysis format used by TDA is a follows: project impact, Cnm-h6VC impact, mitigation measures, unavoidable adverse environmental impact (incha;-g any impam caused by implementing mitigation measures). To thc extent fcasiblc, potential environmental effects will be quantified; howcver, I anticipate that some impact forecasts will be qualitative. 'IDA has allocated a total of 80 hours W this complete this subtask, ass,tin;,,5 that no additional teeh.leal studies are require& Tom Dodson ~ prepare and edit all of the final tm for thi_~ section of the docunlcnt, Subta~k 3: Prepare All Remaining EIR Sections The CEQA mandated sections (Altcmafivea, Growth Inducement, Long-Tcnn vs. Short-Term, and a summary of Mitigadon Measure.% including monitoring requireram) will be provided under this subtask. The series of alternafive~ that wtl be evaluated in th~ document v/dl be defined as part of the project de,scrlptioa. I =,,rldpate evaluating the no project, alternative sites (locations to be determ;,,ed), and alter~stivc cntcP,,;nment faa'litics, as agreed to by the City. It is my intent to prepare a comparative alternative evaluation as outlinccl in the State CEOA Guidelines, Section ]312~ (d). A total of 50 horn are allocated to thi~ subtask. The end product d these three subtasks is the Screencheck DEIR for review by the City. It will be submitted to the City for review, comment, and approval I have conducted discnt~ions with my subconsultants and technical staff regarding the tcehn;cal studies that will be needed for this project. Initial cost estimates for each environmental issue, excluding traffic, arc: Biological Resources Cost Estimate: $10,000 (assumes 100 acre biological survey, including a Gnatcatcher Survey) Cultural Resources Cost Estimate: $5,000 (does not include any additional work within the Old Town area) · Noise Cost Estimate: $7,500 (includes traffic and event noise forecasts) Task 4: Air Quality Cost Estimate: $10,500 (includes a CO hotspot modeling analysis for the most affected intersection) Flnalize Dratt EIR, Publish, and Distribute TDA will meet with the City to coilca all comments on the Screencheek DEIR. These comments will be responded to and a Draft EIR for publie distribution will be compiled and printed for distribution. TDA will supply the City with 50 bound copies of the DEIR for distn'bmion and vail arrange to have copies delivered to the State Clearinghouse, if requested. I antidpate pUbG~h]ng a second volume of teehnlcal appendices that ~ be available upon request. Ten copies of the technical appendices will be provided to the City under thk proposal TDA has alloated 30 hours to this t,~de. inducting clerical staff support. At the end of thl, task, the DEIR w~l be distributed for the 45-day public review and comment period. Task 5: Prepare Responses to Comments TDA will meet with the City to review proposed responses to all comments received on the DEIR. Once general agreement on the content of responses is obtained, they will be prepared and a draft responses to comment document will be delivered to the City for final review and comment. Wc anticipate allocating 80 hours of effort to thk task, indueling 12 hours of mectl-~o~ with the City. If major new issues are raised that were previously not addressed and that the City concludes must be addressed in the Final EIR, 'IDA will pcffonn additional analyses based on mutual agreement on the scope of work and a modified fee. Thc end produa of thi.~ effort will be a Final EIR available for certification F~ty (60) copies of the F~nal EIR will be provided to thc City for use and distribution. These responses to comments wiI] be prepared in a separate volume, unless the City requests that a combined Final EIR document be prcparexL Task 6: Prepare Findings of Fact and Statement of OverTiding Consideration This is an optional task that will be performed ff ther~ arc ,dgnil~e~nt impacts identified h the EIR from implementing the proposed project that cannot be mitigated. Based on my past .experience with projects of this type and size, I expect that it will be nec=ssary to prepare a' findln~ and statements document. TDA has prepared numerous fmdln~ and statements documents which we believe are effective in allowing the local jurisdictions to approve projects with signiliesnt impact. This document would 'be prepared by Tom Doclson and requires approximately 40 hours of eftrot It will be prepared to support the City as "Candidate Findings" and will require approximately 8 hours of meetings with City as part of the total cfforL Task 7: Attend Hearings TDA will attend up to three public hearings as part of the proposal ahoy. A total of 1~ hours have been allocated for this task. Additional meetings will be billed at an hourly rate of $100faour. Thi,~ concludes the description of the scope of work and the tasks that will be performed to deliver a Final E[R to the City for use in making a decision on this project. 4 B. PROJECT MANAGEMENT TDA is the contractor for this project and Tom Dodson will serve as Project Director and primary author of all deliverable reports outlined above. Bill Gatlin will assist with efforts to assemble data and assist with preparing environmental impact evaluations. On behalf of TDA, Tom Dodson will make all final decisions regarding the content of the document for the contractor, excluding specific technical issues that require a registered professional to sign technical reports. Tom Dodson will also be the primary author and final editor of all written CEQA documents submitted to-the City. C, FEE PROPOSAL The following fee information is provided. Please keep in mind that numerous assumptions have been included in these estimates and they could change, increase or decrease, as more infomation becomes available and the specific scope of the EIR is defined. Task 1: Prepare Project Description All work under this task will be performed by TDA for a total fee of $3,000. If the project description is changed ~er it is initially accepted and ~d, the fee w~l have to be adjusted by mutual agreement between TDA and the City. Task 2: Initial Study. Notice of Preparation. and S.coping Sessions All work under this task will be pe~ormed by TDA for a total fee of $5,000. If impact forccasts must be conducted for a revised project description after the Initial Study is completed, the fee will have to be adjusted by mutual agreement betwccn 'IDA and the C. jty. Task 3: Prepare thc Scrccnchcck Di'aft EIR The work under thk task wiIl be performed by TDA and subconsultants. The estimated fees for this task are as follows: Technical Reports: $33,000 (subconsultants) Total fee for Task 3 is $48,000. Fnte copies d the Screencheck Draft EIR will be delivered to the City for review and comment- I will coordln~tc all technical studies to ensure that the information required is provide& My proposed subconsultants for th~ project are: · Biological Resources · Noise · Air Quality Tierra Madre Consultant-~ Brown-Buntin, Inc. AeroViromnent Mr. Michael Lerck TDA's staff archaeologist, will prepare the cultural resources investigation for this projecL 5 · Fro, I,' 4: l:rm,1~'~ Dr, f) ~ lP13'b'F,!k_ 8xld 6 ' D. PROPOSED SCHF,,DULF, TDA proposes to complete this project on the following schedule: Day 1: Day 15: Day 21: Day 28: Day 30: Day 60: Day 75: Day 90: Day 100: Day 150: Day 160: Day 175: Project is authorized by City/biological survey be~--~ Project description is submitted to the City for review and comment Project description is finalizcd/Other technical studies initiated Draft Initial Study is submitted to the City for review and comment Preparation of Sc~ccncheck Draft EIR be~n-~ Teclmical studies submitted to TDA]City for review and comment Technic, a] studies ~nMiT~d Screencheck Draft EIR is submitted for review and comment Draft EIR is publkhcd for public distn'bution, 45 day review Responses to comments arc submitted for review and approval F'mal EIR is completed and ready for certification F'mdings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considcrafions submitted to City for review and approval, hearing can bcheld on the project -, I believe thi.q is an achievable schedule, but an opfml.qtic one that may have to be modified to accommodate additional environmental issues after the scoping process. E. CONCLUSION TDA can provide support services to co,mplete the total CEQA review process for this project in a m~nner that is legally defensible. We can provide all of the technical investigations and compile these studies into a comprehemive, understandable EIR for the City Council to use in making its decision on the proposed project. We believe that the schedule and fee outlined above represent a realistic estimate of costs and time for preparing an EIR for the City; I look forward to working with the City and if thl.q proposal is acceptable, an authorized agent of the City can sign thi.~ letter proposal which is sufficient for TDA to initiate work on thi.~ project. Otherwise, it can be incorporated into a City contract or purchase order, as appropriate. If you have any questions regarding thl.q proposal or related issues, please feel fi'ee to give me a call_ sincerely, Tom Dodson Authorized to proceed, City of Temecula Contracting Representative 7