HomeMy WebLinkAbout022895 CC AgendaIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to I~articipete in
this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (909) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior
to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that
meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104ADA Trtle II]
AGENDA
TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
A REGULAR MEETING
COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER
30875 RANCHO VISTA ROAD
FEBRUARY 28, 1995 - 7:00 PM
5:30 PM - Spedel Meeting Clomld Seadon of the City Councg pursuant to Govemment Code
Sections:
1. §54956.9(b), Polemid Utigsdon, two matters.
2. 954956.8, CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR, Property: 43106 Business
Park Ddve; Negotiating pardes: City of Temectda and Grubb and B~s: Under negotiation: prim
and terms of payment.
At approximately 9:45 PM, the City Council will determine which of the remaining
agenda items can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00 PM and may
continue all other items on which additional time is required until a future meeting.
All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 PM.
CALL TO ORDER:
Invocation:
Flag Salute:
ROLL CALL:
PRESENTATIONS/
PROCLAMATIONS
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. 95-04
Resolution: No. 95-14
Mayor Jeffrey Stone presiding
Bishop Konrad Lee, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints
Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans
Lindemans, Mu~oz, Parks, Roberts, Stone
Commendation - Frank Hammersley, Community Pantry
R:~&eeede~0,121N$ I
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Council on
items that are not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited
to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council on an item not listed on the
Agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out
and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other agenda items a 'Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk
before the Council gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual
speakers.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made at
this time. A total, not to exceed, ten (10) minutes will be devoted to these reports.
CONSENT CALENDAR
2
3
Standard Ordinance Adootion Procedure
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in
the agenda.
Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve the minutes of January 30, 1995.
2.2 Approve the minutes of January 31, 1995.
Resolution Aoorovina List of Demands
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Adopt a resolution emitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 95-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING
CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
R:~/~emle~022116 2
4
Mid-Year Budget Review
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 95-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING
THE FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET
4.2 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 95-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA REVISING
THE SCHEDULE OF AUTHORIZED POSITIONS
5
Release Labor and Material and Monument Bonds in Tract No. 23267-1
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 Authorize the release of Labor and Material Bond for Street, Water, and Sewer
Improvements, and the Monument Bond in Tract No. 23267-1;
5.2 Direct the City Clerk to so notify the Developer and Surety.
6
Release Labor and Material and Monument Bonds in Tract No. 23267-4
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1 Authorize the release of Labor and Material Bond for Street, Water and Sewer
Improvements, and the Monument Bond in Tract No. 23267-4;
6.2 Direct the City Clerk to so notify the Developer and Surety.
7
8
Pro0ram Suoolement No. 005 to the Local Aoencv/State Aoreement for Federal-Aid
Projects for the Traffic Sional at Margarita Road and Avenida Barca IPW93-10)
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1 Adopt e resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 95-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING
PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT NO. 005, TO LOCAL AGENCY/STATE AGREEMENT NO.
08-5459, BETWEEN THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE
CITY OF TEMECULA FOR FEDERAL AID PROJECT NO. STPLG-5459(005),
MARGARITA ROAD AND AVENIDA BARCA
Comoletion and Acceptance of the Ynez Road Landscaoe Imorovements, No. PW94-04
RECOMMENDATION:
8.1
Accept the Ynez Road Landscape Improvements, Project No. PW94-04, as complete
and direct the City Clerk to:
File the Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a
one (1) year Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract;
Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after the filing of the
Notice of Completion if no liens have been filed.
Focused Model Develooment (Traffic - SWAPD)
RECOMMENDATION:
9.1
Approve the four (4) party agreement - Cities of Temecula, Murrieta, Westem
Riverside Council of Governments, and Hank Mohle and Associates Agreement for
Professional Services, Southwest Area Planning District (SWAPD) Traffic Study -
Focused Model Development.
9.2 Authorize the Mayor or his designated representative to sign the agreement.
9.3
Award of contract is subject to approval of Mid-Year Budget request of $12,500 for
that purpose.
10
11
Review and Aooroval of 21 st Year FY 95-96 Community Development Block Grant
AppliCatiOnS
RECOMMENDATION:
10.1 Review and provide direction to staff as to the funding of projects for the 21st Year
FY 95-96 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program.
10.2 Authorize staff to forward the selected CDBG project applications to the Riverside
County Economic Development Agency (EDA).
Professional Services for the Desion of an Interim Traffic Sional for the Intersection of
State Route 79(S) with Maraarita Road\Redhawk Parkway. Pal Road and La Paz Street
RECOMMENDATION: "
11.1 Approve Professional Services Agreements for the deign of an interim traffic signal
for the intersections of State Route 79{S):
· Margarita Road\Redhawk Pkwy BRW, Inc. $5,474.00
· Pala Road Albert Grover & Assoc. $5,230.00
· La Paz Street Transtech $5,065.00
12 Temecula Community Partnership
RECOMMENDATION:
12.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 95-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA TO ADOPT
AND SUPPORT THE PREVENTION GOALS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY
PARTNERSHIP
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before a public
hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of
the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court,
you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the
public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior
to, the public hearing.
13
Planning Aoolication No, PA94-0062. Pulte Home CORD,
RECOMMENDATION:
13.1 Read by title only and introduce an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 95-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING
SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 213, AMENDMENT NO. 2 (PA94-0062); AMENDING SPECIFIC
PLAN NO. 213 TO CHANGE THE ZONING FOR PLANNING AREA 11 (32 ACRES)
FROM VERY HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (14-20 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE
WITH A MAXIMUM OF 360 MULTI-FAMILY DWELLINGS) TO MEDIUM DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL (2-5 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE WITH A MAXIMUM OF 150
SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS), LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF
TOWN VIEW AVENUE AND MURRIETA HOT SPRINGS ROAD
14
City of Temecula's Vendor's Ordinance
RECOMMENDATION:
14.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 95-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA MAKING
CERTAIN FINDINGS IN CONNECTION WITH THE APPROVAL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA VENDOR'S ORDINANCE AND ADOPTING THE NEGATIVE
DECLARATION
14.2
Read by title only and introduce an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 95-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA PERTAINING
TO OUTDOOR VENDORS AND ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS FOR OUTDOOR
VENDING
R:V~ende%02,2196 ·
COUNCIL BUSINESS
15 School District Mitioation Fees
(Continued from the meeting of 2/14/95)
RECOMMENDATION:
15.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 95-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING
THE SCHOOL FACILITY IMPACT MITIGATION PROGRAM
16
17
18
Contract for User Fee and Develooment Imoact Fee Study
RECOMMENDATION:
16.1 Approve the contract with David M. Griffith and Associates (DMG) to conduct a
user fee and development impact fee analysis.
16.2 Appropriate $39,340 from General Fund fund balance to account number 001-140-
999-5248 (Consulting) to fund this contract.
Adhoc Committee for Communitv Services Funding
RECOMMENDATION:
17.1 Appoint two members of the Council to serve on an Adhoc Committee to review
Community Services Funding Applications.
Reouest for Funds for Temecula Valley Film Festival
RECOMMENDATION:
18.1 Consider a funding request for the Temecula Valley Film Council.
19
Discussion of California State Lottery and the Distribution to the City of Temecula
(Placed on the agenda at the request of Mayor Stone)
R:~ead,%022816 7
DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: March 14, 1995, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho
Vista Road, Temecula, California.
R:~a~gende~02219~ ·
TEMFCULA COMMUNITY SFRVI~;8 DISTRICT NFFTINn - {To be held at 8:00)
CALL TO ORDER: President Ronald H. Roberts
ROLL CALL: DIRECTORS: Lindemans, Mufioz, Parks, Stone, Roberrs
PUBLIC COMMENT: Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors, should present a
completed pink "Request to Speak" to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come
forward and state your name and address for the record.
CONSENT CALENDAR
I Swim Team Aoreement
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the Agreement between the City of Temecula Community Services
Department and the Temecula Tritons Swim Team, for use of the Community
Recreation Center Swimming Pool.
2 Review and Aooroval of the 1994-95 Mid-Year Budoet
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
3
RESOLUTION NO. 95-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY
SERVICES DISTRICT AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 ANNUAL OPERATING
BUDGETS
Parkview Site Proiect - Phase II
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Approve Amendment No. I of $66,300to the design contract with RJM Design
Group, Inc. to include the design, construction documents, and construction
administration for Phase II of the Parkview Site Project, described as the upper pond
and channel improvements adjacent to the Sports Park Desiltation Lake.
R:',l~gende~022116 ·
DISTRICT BUSINESS
4 Santa Gertrudis Creek Trail - Final Aoreement with Riverside County Flood Control
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Approve the Agreement between the City of Temecul8 and Riverside County Flood
Control to utilize the Santa Gertrudis Channel Improvements for Recreation Trail
purposes.
4.2 Appropriate $25,000 in Public Facilities - Development Impact Fees for the
necessary trail improvements.
GENERAL MANAGERS REPORT - Bradley
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT - Nelson
BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT: Next meeting: March 14, 1995, 8:00 PM, Community Recreation Center,
30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California.
R:~4e~e~02211i 10
CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Ronald J. Parks presiding
ROLL CALL:
AGENCY MEMBERS: Lindemans, Mufioz, Roberrs, Stone, Parks
PUBLIC COMMENT:
Anyone wishing to address the Agency, should present a completed pink
"Request to Speak" to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please
come forward and state your name and address for the record.
CONSENT CALENDAR
I Consideration of RDA Commercial Rehabilitation Small Business Loan
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1
Consider approval of an RDA Commercial Rehabilitation Loan to The Blind Pig
Brewing Co., Inc., located at 42387 Avenida Alvaredo, Suite 108, Temecula, CA
92590.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
AGENCY MEMBER'S REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT: Next Meeting: March 14, 1995, 8:00 PM, 30875 Rancho Vista Road,
Temecula, California.
R:%Aeende~D22196 11
ITEM
1
ITEM 2
MINUTES OF A SPECIAL MEETING
HELD JOINTLY WITH THE
CITY OF TEMECULA
CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING COMMISSION
JANUARY 30, 1995
A special meeting held jointly with the City of Temecule Planning Commission and the
Temecule City Council, held on Monday, January 30, 1995, 7:00 P.M., at the Temecula
City Hall Main Conference Room, 43174 Business Park Drive, Temeculs, California. Mayor
Jeffrey Stone presiding. Councilmember Roberts led the flag salute.
PRESENT: 5
ABSENT: 0
PRESENT: 3
ABSENT: 2
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
Lindemans, Mu~oz, Parks,
Roberts, Stone
None
Slaven, Webster, Ford
Blair, Fahey
Also present were City Manager Ronald Bradley, City Clerk June S. Greek, Planning and
Director Gary Thornhill.
PUBLIC COMMENT
Arthur Pelka, 43185 Mergerits Road, Temecula, representing the homeowners in the
Chaparral and Paloma Del Sol area, expressed opposition to the commercially zoned
property at the corner of Pauba and Margarita Roads. Mr. Pelka said the homeowners
understood from the Planning Commission meeting in December, 1994, that they cannot
have the proposed development stopped. He said that the homeowners would like the
opportunity to discuss what types of business will be allowed in the commercial center.
COUNCIL REPORTS
None
COUNCIL BUSINESS
1. Authorization to Award Informal Bids for Interim Fire Station
Community Services Director Shawn Nelson presented the staff report.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans to
approve staff recommendation as follows:
1.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
JOINT CITY COUNCILIPLANNINR COMMISSION MI::I:'rlNG
JANUARY 30, 1995
RESOLUTION N0.95-09
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO AWARD CONSTRUCTION
CONTRACTS FOR AN INTERIM FIRE STATION IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO
EXCEED $75,000 IN ACCORDANCE WITH MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION
3.32.050
The motion was carried as follows:
AYES: 5
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Lindemans, Muf~oz, Parks,
Roberrs, Stone
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
2. Introduction of the City of Temeculs Draft Development Code
Planning Director Gary Thornhill presented the staff report.
Senior Planner John Meyer advised on the current status of the Development Code.
Mr. Meyer said the Planning Commission will set aside the second meeting of every
month beginning February 27, 1995, to review the draft Development Code, and
anticipates the review to be completed in 3 or 4 meetings. The Development Code
will then be brought to the City Council for review and approval.
Commissioner Fahey arrived at 7:20 P.M.
Mayor Pro Tern Lindemans asked if the homeowners who Mr. Pelka is representing,
will have their concerns addressed about a certain business proposed for the
commercial center in their neighborhood.
Director Thornhill explained the designation is citywide. He said that whatever is
allowed at this neighborhood commercial center, will be allowed at all neighborhood
commercial centers throughout the City. He suggested the Commission and the
Council target those uses which they ere most concerned with and conditionally
approve them.
Planning Commissioner Marcia Slaven said when she looks at the Draft
Development Code for neighborhood commercial, she determines what would be
suitable for the neighborhood environment.
Mayor Stone said he would like increased advertisement for the Development Code
hearings.
JOINT CITY COUNCIL/PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
JANUARY 30.1995
Mark Telford, 33415 Little Red Place, Menifee, representing the Winchester Group,
41735 Winchester Road, Temecula, said the building at this address was designed
for a showroom type use. He said he receives a lot of calls for carpet and furniture
sales facilities however, the City does not allow this use. Mr. Telford said he would
like to see an amendment allowing service commercial uses in the business park
zone.
Planner John Meyer explained that the City has brought community commercial
zoning further west along Winchester Road however, the consensus from the
community workshops was to focus the community commercial uses along the
Jefferson corridor as opposed to the Winchester corridor.
Councilmember Mufioz said he feels grandfathering existing uses will satisfy the
concerns of existing business and property owners and accomplish what the City is
trying to achieve with the development code.
It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember Parks to
receive and file the report.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 5
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Lindemans, Mur~oz, Parks,
Roberts, Stone
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Planning Commissioner Andrew Webster advised Council that the Commission has
reviewed their first Village Center and continued the item to March 6, 1995.
Commissioner Webster said he would like s joint workshop with the Council to discuss the
Village Center concept.
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember Roberts to
adjourn at 8:15 P.M. The motion was unanimously carried.
The next meeting of the Temecula City Council will be held jointly with the RDA on
January 31, 1995, 7:00 P.M., at the Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista
Road, Temeculs, California.
The next regular meeting of the Temecula City Council will be held on Tuesday, February
14, 1995, 7:00 P.M., at the Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road,
Temecula, California.
Mayor Jeffrey Stone
ATTEST:
City Clerk June S. Greek
MINUTES OF A SPECIAL MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL/
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
JANUARY 31, 1995
A special meeting of the Temecula City Council/Temecula Redevelopment Agency was called
to order on Tuesday, January 31, 1995, 7:05 P.M., at the Temecula Community Recreation
Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California, Mayor Jeffrey E. Stone presiding.
PRESENT: 5
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Lindemans, Mufioz, Parks, Roberts,
Stone
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Also present were City Manage Ronald Bradley, Assistant City Manager Mary Jane McLarney,.
City Attorney Peter Thorsen and City Clerk June S. Greek.
INVOCATION
The invocation was given by Pastor Dave Belcher, Sunrise Community Church.
FLAG SALUTE
Agency Chairperson Parks led the flag salute.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Bonnie Reed, 42050 Main Street, objected to the findings of the poll taken by the Main Street
Association, stating many members of the organization do not reside or own a business in Old
Town.
PRESENTATIONS/PROC~ AMATIONS
Mr. Howard Chesher introduced NIs. Janet Roth who will serve as the Administrative Director
of Old Town Mainstreet Program.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Councilmember Mur~oz reported he visited Southern California Edison's facility in Menifee and
test drove the new electric vehicle. He suggested the rest of the Council test drive this
vehicle and asked that the City liegin to prepare for the introduction of this technology.
Mayor Stone reported he met wi~h Assemblyman Ray Hayes regarding Proposition 111 funds,
and reported that funds may be wailable in conjunction with the Winchester Bridge project.
TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL%RDA MEETING MINUTES
1131195
COUNCIL BUSINESS
1. Pale Road Bridae
City Manager Bradley presented the staff report noting Council has been provided with
an amended version of the Memorandum of Agreement. He explained this agreement
was made possible through the cooperation and initiation of the Pechanga Band, and
reported that it provides sufficient funds to complete construction of the Pale Road
bridge.
Mayor Stone asked for an explanation of the changes.
Public Works Director Joe Kicak outlined the changes as follows:
Item A-5 of the original agreement was modified adding a statement regarding
availability of funds. Second item modified, B-5 which adds the provision: The City
will provide monthly progress reports with invoice, progress payment to the Bureau
during construction of bridge.
It was moved by Councilmember Roberts, seconded by Councilmember Parks to
approve staff recommendation as follows:
1.1
Authorize the Mayor to sign the Memorandum of Agreement between the
Bureau of Indian Affairs and the City of Temecula.
The motion was unanimously carried.
JOINT COUNCIl/RDA BUSINESS
Amended and Restated Memorandum of understandina Between the City of Temecule
Redevelooment Aaencv of the City of Temecula. and T.?.B.G.. Inc.
Mayor Stone announced a conflict of interest on this item, based on his ownership of
property in Old Town, and turned the meeting over to Chairperson Parks.
City Manager Ron Bradley presented the staff report outlining the changes in the MOU.
Lots were drawn to determine the order of speakers. T.O.T.A.L. drew the first 10
minutes, with "Yes on Measure B" to follow. Private citizens wishing to speak were
drawn at random and given two minutes each.
Therese McLeod, representing T.O.T.A.L., voiced her objection to the revised MOU and
stated T.O.T.A.L's objection to the Old Town Entertainment Center is the project size,
scope and appropriateness for Old Town. She also objected to a change made in the
Old Town Specific Plan, on Section 2, Page 13.
TEMFCULA CITY COUNCIL~RDA MEFTING MINUTES
RECESS
Chairperson Parks called a recess at 8:04 PM to change the tape.
reconvened at 8:05 PM.
113 1195
The meeting was
Joan Sparkman, representing "Yes on B", voiced her support of the revised MOU and
the Old Town Entertainment Center, citing potential employment opportunities and the
revitalization of Old Town as points in favor.
Doug Davies, representing "Yes on B", voiced his support for the project listing
restoration of the economical viability of Old Town and the strengthening of the
financial base for the City. He also listed the need for funding of street and=
infrastructure improvements.
Ginger Greeves, representing "Yes on B", spoke in support of exposure for the arts
and the wholesome entertainment this project will bring.
Zav Buffman, representing "Yes on B" , showed slides of other projects he has worked
on and stated he will bring quality entertainment and quality restoration and
construction of buildings that will enhance Old Town.
Joseph Terrezas, 31160 Lahontan St., spoke in opposition to the Old Town
Entertainment Project. ,
Lauretta Olson, 41945 Koffenboom Ct., spoke in favor of the Old Town Entertainment
Center.
Dennis Frank, 27475 Ynez Road, #338, spoke in favor of Old Town Entertainment
Project.
Bill Harker, 31130-85 South General Kearny Road, spoke in favor of the Old Town
Entertainment Center Project.
Marvin Zeldin, 38027 Via Del Luigi, spoke in favor of the Old Town Entertainment
Center Project.
Dallas Gray, P.O. Box 457, representing the Old Town Redevelopment Advisory
Committee, informed the Council that the Committee had not had the opportunity to
review this document.
Bonnie Reed, 42050 Main Street, representing the Old Town Redevelopment Advisory
Committee, asked that the committee be informed in advance of action affecting Old
Town.
Art Beese, 41778 Bargil Court, spoke in opposition of the project.
TFMECULA CITY COUNCIL~RDA MEFTING MINUTI:S
1131195
Dennis Schare, 28730 Via Calusa, Murrieta, spoke in favor of the project, stating it
would provide an economic base, but suggested the City look at a "no growth" policy
on completion of the project.
Kenneth Dodd, 30097 Via Velez Place, spoke in favor of the Old Town Entertainment
Center Project.
Ann Buford, spoke in opposition to the project.
RECESS
Chairperson Parks called a recess at 8:54 PM. The meeting was reconvened at 9:07 PM.
George Buhler, 40265 Paseo Sereno, spoke in opposition to the Old Town
Entertainment Center Project.
Jim Meyler, President of Arts Council, 29930 Santiago Road, spoke in favor of the
amended Memorandum of Understanding.
Phillip Columbo, 2900 Front Street, gave his time to Zev Buffman.
Zev Buffman, responded to allocations made by Joseph Tarrazes regarding the sale of
his chain of theaters, stating he had been in the entertainment theater business for 26
years and simply decided to turn his energy in another direction, outdoor amphitheaters
and sporting events.
Sam Pratt, 40470 Brixton Cove, spoke in opposition to project.
Sandra Garcia, representing Employment Development Department, 40880-B Country
Center Drive, offered the Departments services to interview future employees.
Bob Kirpatrick, 27720 Jefferson, spoke in favor of project and the amended MOU.
Stewart and Pat Morris, 29734 Calla Pantano, spoke in favor of Old Town
Entertainment Center Project.
AI Spencer, 30542 Bag Hill Drive, voiced concern regarding the financing of the
Project.
Robert Felix, 39280 Calla Bellagio, representing Youth for Economic Development,
spoke in favor of the Old Town Entertainment Center Project.
Alice Sullivan, representing the Temecule Valley Chamber of Commerce, spoke in favor
of the Old Town Entertainment Center Project.
Jeffrey Horton, 24892 Ravensview Court, spoke in support of project.
TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL%RDA MEETING MINUT;S
113 1195
Neil Cleveland, 28465 Front Street, spoke in support of the amended MOU and the
Project.
Phila McDaniel, 42050 Main Street, No. B, spoke in opposition to the project and asked
that a moratorium be placed on rent increases in Old Town.
Frank Dagonese, spoke in favor of the amended MOU and the Old Town Entertainment
Center Project.
Councilmember Mufioz asked for clarification of the following items: wages, air quality
and other mitigation efforts, rent controls, number of jobs created during and after
completion of tie project, conduit financing, C.O.P.S. (Certificates of Participation),
how debt is retired, collateral, retail inside the hotel and how it relates to existing
merchants, parking and whether phasing should be used.
Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans asked for an explanation of the cost differential on the
Western Bypass, from 1.5 Million, to 11 million and on the Assessment District and
who would be assessed. He also asked how long the MOU would remain in effect and
whether the City is considering buying any of these bonds.
RECESS
Chairperson Parks called a recess at 9:52 PM. The meeting was reconvened at 10:02 PM.
City Manager Bradley responded that the City does not plan to buy any bonds and the
MOU extends through August 1, 1995 with one six-month extension.
City Manager Bradley explained that proposed retail located near the hotel and arena,
are designed to serve tourist needs and not to complete with existing merchants.
With regard to the possibility of phasing, Mr. Bradley explained Price Waterhouse
indicated the key to the success of the project is the scope and synergy and indicated
phasing is not considered · viable option.
Mr. Bradley explained that no existing Old Town land owners or residents will
participate in assessment for the Western Bypass. Only those landowners who get
direct benefit will be assessed.
City Attorney Thorson steed he does not have a definitive answer on the possibiliy of
commercial rent control, ~ would do further research if it is the will of the Council.
Council consensus was reached to bring this point back before the Council at a future
date.
TFMFCULA CITY COUNCIL%RDA MEETING MINUTES
1131195
City Manager Bradley introduced Associate Planner Dave Hogan to address air quality
and parking.
Mr. Hogan explained that based on Air Quality Management Districts standards, traffic
associated with the project is expected to exceed the air Quality standards. He stated
that the development anticipated in this area will have regional impacts which are not
considered significant. He stated Council will have the opportunity to adopt 8
statement of overriding considerations to the EIR.
Councilmember Muf~oz asked Mr. Buffman to share some ideas for mitigation of traffic
and air impacts. Mr. Buffman presented his ideas regarding use of non-polluting
vehicles and a possible light rail system. He reported that 811 vehicles used to bring
people in and out of the project will be non-polluting.
RECESS
Chairperson Parks called a brief recess at 10:17 PM to change tape. The meeting was
reconvened at 10:18 PM.
Planning Director Gary Thornhill responded to the question regarding added language
in the Old Town Specific Plan. He reported that this language was added at the
noticed public hearing of February 8, 1994, which provided for modification of the plan
should an entertainment complex become a reality in the future.
Public Works Director Joe Kicak responded that the Overland Bridge Crossing price
differential was because ~ 1.5 million is listed in the Capital Improvement Plan as a line
item for design, noting one source of funding. He stated that $11.5 is the estimated
cost of the completed overcrossing.
Assistant City Manager Mary Jane McLarney explained conduit financing and discussed
Certificates of Participation (COPS), explaining that in essence this is a sponsorship,
not a financial responsibility. She also indicated the number of direct jobs from this
project is estimated at 1,062. She explained using the multiplier effect, the total jobs
produced is estimated at 2500.
She explained that the title of property is held by the property owner, the bond holders
have financial interests in property and once bonds are issued, the City would have
no financial interest. She stated if revenues don't support the issue, staff won't
recommend it. Debt retirement is planned to come from revenues of project.
Mr. Buffman answered the question regarding wages, stating the average annual salary
would be e 19,600/year with jobs falling into the categories of talent, general and
administrative, operations, security, sanitation and parking, food and beverage. He
explained that the food and beverage category would be the lowest category averaging
$13,500\year or $6.50 hr., however 80% of jobs will pay either double the minimum
TEMFCULA CITY COUNCIL%RDA MEETING MINUTES 1131195
wage or higher.
Associate Planner David Hogan answered the question regarding parking, stating that
three parkinglots are planned. Planned locations are as follows: south end of Front
Street, 1000 to 1200 vehicles; behind the proposed hotel an area for 2,000 vehicles;
and a smaller lot to service the north end of Old Town, using the City-owned parcel on
6th Street.
Mr. Hogan explained that a traffic analysis was done for peak hour traffic, adding
maximum traffic from the project. He explained that the traffic does not deteriorate
except at South 79 and Interstate 15. He explained there is not a significant impact
from additional vehicle trips.
It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember Roberts to
approve staff recommendation as follows:
2.1 Approve the execution of the Memorandum of Understanding.
The motion was unanimously carried with Mayor Stone abstaining.
CITY MANAGER/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
None given.
CITY ATTORNEY/GENERAL COUNSEL'S REPORT
None given.
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Councilmember Roberts, seconded by Councilmember Parks to adjourn at
10:58 P.M. The motion was unanimously carried.
The next regular meeting of the Temecula City Council will be held on Tuesday, February 14,
1995, 7:00 P.M., Temecula Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road,
Temecula, California.
ATTEST:
Jeffrey E. Stone
Mayor
June S. Greek, CMC
City Clerk
(:~,~D~AAINUTE~!/21.~6 7 12j'Je~
ITEM 3
RESOLIH'ION NO. 95--
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND
DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EYi:HR1T A
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMF_I3ULA DOES RESOLVE,
DETERIvlINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A have been
audited by the City Manager, and that the same are hereby allowed in the amount of
$1,152,076.41.
Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 28th day of February, 1995.
ATTEST:
Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk, CMC
[SEAL]
P.~osSl
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
crry OF TEMF~ULA)
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do certify that the
foregoing Re,~lution No. 95- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the
City of Temecula on the 28th day of February, 1995 by the following x'x~ll call vote:
AYES: 0
COUNCH,MEMBERS: None
NOES: 0
COUNCILMBiBERS: None
COUNCK/~MBER~: None
June S. Greek, City Clerk, CMC
CITY OF TEMECULA
LIST OF DEMANDS
02/09/95 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
02/18/95 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
02/17/95 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
02/28/95 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
02109/95 TOTAL PAYROLL:
TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 02/28/95 COUNCIL MEETING:
DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND:
CHECKS:
001 GENERAL
100 GAS TAX
120 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FUND
140 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT
165 RDA-LOW/MOD
190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D
21 0 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ (CIP)
220 MARGARITA ROAD REIMB. DIST.
250 CAPITAL PROJECTS - TCSD
280 RDA4:~IP
300 INSURANCE
310 VEHICLES
320 INFORMATIONS SYSTEMS
330 SUPPORT SERVICES
340 FACILITIES
380 RDA-DEBT SERVICE
390 TCSD DEBT SERVICE
PAYROLL:
001 GENERAL
100 GAS TAX
165 RDA-LOW/MOD
190 TCSD
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
280 RDA4:~IP
300 INSURANCE
320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS
330 SUPPORT SERVICES
340 FACILITIES
TOTAL BY FUND:
RONALD E. BRADLEY, CITY MANAGER
$ 114,758.94
190,206.82
429,634.74
292,451.71
125,024.20
$ 1,152,076.41
744,035.10
18,073.07
0.00
0.03
497.28
53,718.41
9,060.65
23,936.56
20,648.29
0.00
42,368.53
0.03
0.00
90,033.12
6,100.01
0.00
11,625.34
3,928.80
2,029.07
0.00
0.00
$ 1,027,052.21
81,007.29
16,542.46
657.52
17,826.22
464.00
620.26
1,803.96
745.37
1,961.11
1,306.23
0.03
2,083.78
125,024.20
$ 1,152,076.41
, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT
, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT
VOUCHRE2
02/09/95
12:37
CITY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
100 GAS TAX FUND
165 RDA DEV- LOg/NOD SET ASIDE
190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND
280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CZP
]00 INSURANCE FUND
320 INFORIMT]OR SYSTENS
330 SUPPORT SERVICES
3~0 FACILITIES
TOTAL
ANOUNT
63,736.68
12,207.07
457.16
17,720.9~.
5/~..38
520
2,4.83.91
/,89.00
8,583.69
2,054.20
3,353.14
1,615.09
114,758.9A
vO
02/, J
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
21960
4~8221
,~1
4/,8221
448221
448221
6J,8221
448221
z~8221
4~,8221
~48221
~8221
~8221
~8221
454154
454154
454154
4F/'--~
454154
454154
454154
454154
454154
454154
454154
454154
454154
454154
454154
454154
454154
454154
454154
454154
22067
22068
22068
22068
22068
22068
22068
12:37
CHECK
DATE
01/30/~5
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02109195
02/09/95
02/09/95
VENDOR
NUMIIER
000128
000444
000~4
ooe~
000/.-44
ooe444
ooe444
ooc~
ooo~
000~
000~
000~
000283
000283
000283
00028S
000283
00028~
00028S
000283
00028~
000283
00028~
000283
000283
000283
00028~
000283
000283
00028~
00028~
000283
000283
000724
000116
000116
000116
000116
000116
000116
000116
000116
000116
VENDOR
NAHE
CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES,
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (El)D)
FIRSTAX (El)D)
FIRSTAX (El)D)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX ([RS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (/AS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (]RS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
F]RSTAX (]RS)
FIRSTAX (]RS)
A & R CUSTOM SCREEN PAl
A V P VISION PLANS
A V P VISION PLANS
A V P VISION PLANS
A V P VISION PLANS
A V P VISION PLANS
A V P VISION PLANS
A V P VISION PLANS
A V P VISION PLANS
A V P VISION PLANS
CITY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
BOND FOR BREATHING TRUCK
000~4 SO l
000,~ SOl
000~ SOl
00044~ STATE
O004z~e STATE
O00Z~,~ STATE
O004Z~ STATE
00044~ STATE
0004~ STATE
000444 STATE
000/~ STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
O004Z~ STATE
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 NED[CARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 NEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 NED/CANE
000283 FEDICARE
000283 NEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 NEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 NED[CARE
SPRTS PROGRAMS AWARDS
000116 AVP
000116 AVP
000116 AVP
000116 AVP
000116 AVP
000116 AVP
000116 AVP
000116 AVP
000116 AVP
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-171-999-5201
001-2070
100-2070
190-2070
001-2070
100-2070
165-2070
'190-2070
191-2070
192-2070
193-2070
280-2070
300-2070
]20-2070
340-2070
001-2070
100-2070
165-2070
190-2070
191-2070
192-2070
193-2070
280-2070
300-2070
320-2070
340-2070
001-2070
100-2070
165-2070
190-2070
191-2070
192-2070
193-2070
280-2070
300-2070
320-2070
340-2070
190-183-999-5380
001-2310
100-2310
165-2310
190-2310
191 -r410
193-2310
280-2310
300-2310
340-2310
ITEM
AMOUNT
2,08.00
37.81
16.9~
28.12
3,329.30
674.89
20.42
516.12
16.76
8.91
45
9.67
194.30
62.73
13.64
12,115.71
2,607.09
85.~
2,2~.55
49.60
213.80
5~.~
1~.~
2,961.~
598.40
17.70
22.~
~.10
18.29
82.~
57.~
905.82
395
91.18
6.68
52.90
4.39
5.36
3.34
2.~
16,70
PAGE 1
CHECK
ANOUNT
2,083.00
4,97~.47
22,992.68
905.82
VOUCHRE2
02/09/95
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
22068
22068
22068
22068
22069
22070
22071
22072
2207'~
22074
22075
22076
22077
22078
22078
22078
22078
22078
22078
22078
22078
22078
22078
22078
22078
22078
22078
22078
22078
22078
22078
22078
22078
22078
22078
22078
22078
22078
22078
22078
12:37
CHECK
DATE
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02109195
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
VENDOR
NLllER
000116
000116
000116
000116
001674
000400
000100
000427
000122
001718
000679
000679
000679
000679
000679
000679
000679
000679
000679
000679
000679
000679
000679
000679
000679
000679
000679
000679
000679
000679
000679
000679
000679
VENDOR
NAME
A V P VISION PLANS
A V P VISION PLANS
A V P VISION PLANS
A V P VISION PLANS
ADKINS, RONERT STEVEN
ALEXANDER HAMILTON ]NST
ALLIED BARRICADE CONPAR
AMERICAN CULTURE
ANTONIO, PENNY
ANTUZZI, HATT
ARTESIA IMPLEMENT, INC.
B s N SPORTS
BEJING LONGEyITY, INC.
BOGBAPHICS PRINTING PLU
BOGRAPHICS PRINTING PLU
BOGBAPHICS PRINTING PLU
BOGBAPHICS PRINTING PLU
BOGRAPNICS PRINTING PLU
BOGRAPHICS PRINTING PLU
BOGRAPHICS PRINTING PLU
BOGRAPHICS PRINTING PLU
BOGRAPHICS PRINTING PLU
BOGRAPHICS PRINTING PLU
BOGRAPHICS PRINTING PLU
BOGRAPHICS PRINTING PLU
BOGRAPH[CS PRINTING PLU
BOGRAPH[CS PRINTING PLU
BOGRAPHICS PRINTING PLU
BOGRAPHICS PRINTING PLU
BOGRAPHICS PRINTING PLU
BOGRAPHICS PRINTING PLU
BOGRAPHICS PRINTING PLU
BOGRAPHICS PRINTING PLU
BOGRAPHICS PRINTING PLU
BOGRAPHICS PRINTING PLU
BOGRAPHICS PRINTING PLU
BOGRAPHICS PRINTING PLU
BOGRAPHICS PRINTING PLU
BOGRAPHICS PRINTING PLU
BOGRAPHICS PRINTING PLU
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
000116 AVP COER
000116 AVP DED
000116 AVP
000116 AVP REVE
PAYMENT TO TCSD INSTRUCTOR
NANAGER'S LEGAL BULLETIN
NISC SUPPLIES FOR RD I~ORK
REFUND-ROOM RENTAL DEPOSIT
REFUND FOR TCSO CLASS
REFUND FOR TCSO CLASS
REPAIRS FOR TCND TRACTOR
TENNIS TOURNARENT TABLE
PAYMENT TO TC~D INSTRUCTON
BUSINESS LICENSE APPLICATIONS
BUSINESS CARDS/M. SLAVEN
BUSINESS CARDS/A. k/EBSTER
BUSINESS CARDS/H. MILLER
BUSINESS CARDS/K. LINDEHANS
TAX
TAX
TAX
TAX
BUSINESS CARDS: L.A.AHAVISCA
BUSINESS CARDS: J.CROeJE-PELLET
TAX
POLICE DEPT LETTERHEAD
POLICE DEPT ENVELOPES
COLOR WASH UP
TAX
GOLD FOIL LETTERHEAD
BUSINESS CARDS-R. RONERTS
BUSINESS CARDS-JEFFREY STONE
TAX
BUSINESS CARDS/POLICE DEPT
TYPESETT I NG
TAX
BUSINESS CARDS NOT REC'D/RR
BUSINESS CARDS NOT REC'D/JS
TAX
BUSINESS CARD NOT REC'D
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-1180
001-Z$10
001-2~10
001-2~10
190-183-999-5330
001-150-999-5228
100-164-601-5218
190-2900
190-183-4982
190-183-4982
190-180-999-5214
190-180-999-5301
190-183-999-5330
001-140-999-5220
001-161-999-5222
001-161-999-5222
190-180-999-5222
001-100-999-5220
190-180-999-5222
001-161-999-5222
001-100-999-5220
001-140-999-5220
190-180-999-5220
190-180-999-5220
190-180-999-5220
001-170-999-5222
001-170-999-5222
001-170-999-5222
001-170-999-5222
001-100-999-5220
001-100-999-5220
001-100-999-5220
001-100-999-5220
001-170-999-5220
001-170-999-5220
001-170-999-5220
001-100-999-5220
001-100-999-5220
001-100-999-5220
001-100-999-5220
ITEM
AMOUNT
9.75
1.52
1.52
1.52-
69.60
48.00
32.14
100.00
15.00
20.00
72.30
37.68
80.00
183.71
31.88
31.88
31.88
91.02
2.47
4.94
7.05
14.24
31.88
31.88
4.94
40.69
37.75
15.00
7.24
27, 02
91.02
91,02
16,20
31.88
12.00
2.47
91.02-
91.02-
14.11-
96.07-
CHECK
AROUNT
590.20
69.60
48.00
32.14
100.00
15.00
20.00
7Z.30
37.68
vd
VOUCHER/
CHECK
HUNBER
2207~
22079
22080
22081
22082
2208S
2208~
22085
22086
22086
22087
22089
22090
22090
22090
22090
22090
22090
22090
22090
22091
22092
22093
22093
220~3
220~3
22093
22094
22095
12:37
CHECK
DATE
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/0~/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
VENDOR
NUNBER
000839
000839
000128
001054
001528
001717
000131
000131
001195
001670
001670
001670
000980
000140
000140
000140
000140
000140
000140
000140
000140
001275
000155
000156
000156
000156
000156
000156
001056
001701
001701
VENDOR
NN4E
CELSOC
CELSOC
CSULBF~ATZON
CVJPIA
CAL'SURANCE ASSOCIATES,
CALIFORNIA BUILDING OFF
CALIFORNIA DEPT OF JUST
CALIFORNIA TRADE & COI4H
CARL gARREN & CO., INC.
CARL MARREN & CO., INC.
CENTRAL SECURITY SERVIC
CHAMBERS,
CHANBERS, BOB
CHAHBERS, BOO
COAST IRRIGATION SUPPLY
COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN
COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN
COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEH
COLONIAL LKFE & ACCXDEN
COLONIAL LIFE & ACCXDEN
COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN
COLONIAL LIFE & ACC]DEN
COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN
COHPUSERVE, INC.
DAVLIN
DENTICARE OF CALIFORNIA
DENT[CARE OF CALIFORNIA
DENTICARE OF CALIFORNIA
DENTZOARE OF CALIFORNIA
DENT/CARE OF OAL]FORNIA
EDNOFFo VANICE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL RENTAL CENTER
EXCEL RENTAL CENTER
CITY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERICOS
ITEN
DESCRIPTION
NAP ACT SEHINAR 2/ZS/95
NAP ACT SEMINAR 3117/95
GRANT gRITING klORKSHOP-PCNELL
RKSHP: ACCIDENT INVEST 2/16 DL
INSURANCE FOR SlO CHEW PU
DUES FOR A. ELNO FY 4195-5196
FINGERPRINT PROCESSING FEE
TRENDS 2000 SHOM 2/13-14/95
OLD VAIL PARTNERS' 11/12/93
CALLAHAN DANIELLE 08/24/94
SECURITY HONITORING t C.R.C.
RADAR HOLSTER FOR POLICE MTRCY
FREIGHT
TAX
PUIIP FOR CITY YARD
000140 600 A&S
000140 600 A&S
000140 CANCER
000140 CANCER
000140 CANCER
000140 CANCER
000140 CANCER
000140 CANCER
FEB 95 ACCESS CHARGES
TAPING OF 1/31 COUNCIL HEETING
000156 DEN-NqIN
000156 DENT-ADV
000156 DENTICAR
000156 DENT-REV
000156 DENTIOAR
REFUND FOR TCSD CLASS
REHOVEL OF gEED i $N)DLEMOCO
PUNP & HOSE RENTAL
PUMP & HOSE RENTAL
ACCOUNT
NUNHER
100-164-603-5258
001-163-999-5261
001-165-999-5260
001-150-999-5261
001-171-999-5201
001-162-999-5226
001-150-999-5250
280-199-999-5264
)00-199-9~9-5205
300-19~-999-5205
190-182-999-5250
001-170-9~-5242
001-170-9~-5242
001-170-;-5242
190-180-~-5212
001-7_330
190-2330
001-2330
100-2330
190-2330
191-Z330
193-2330
280-2330
320-199-999-5228
001-100-999-5250
001-23~.0
001-1180
001-2340
001-1180
001-Z.~0
190-183-4980
193-180-999-5415
100-164-601-5238
100-164-601-5238
ITER
ANOUNT
385.00
385. O0
150.00
50.00
239. O0
150.00
192.00
780.00
356,00
476.50
53.00
138.00
8.50
11.38
35,(X)
39.75
152.47
12.94
14.35
17.53
5.18
10,00
789.06
15.00
7.84
7.8~
7.84
10,00
345. O0
120.11
180,16
PAGE 3
CHECK
770. O0
150,00
50.00
239.00
· . 150.00
192o00
832.50
53.00
157.88
35.09
365.61
10.00
78~.06
30.68
10.00
345.00
300.27
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TENECULA
02/09/~5 12:37 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM
liIJMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
ITEM
AleXIT
CHECK
ANOUIIT
22097 02/09/95 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. EXPRESS NAIL SERVICE
22098 02/09/95 001511 FIELDNAN ROLAPP & ASSOC PROF SERVICE RE: LEIFER RD
001-162-999-5230
210-166-627-5802
15.25
435.00
: 15.25
435.00
22099 02/09/95 000803 FLAGHOUSE, INC. IGi!K KOLD (CASE/16)
22099 02/09/95 000803 FLAGHOUSE, [NC. FREIGHT
22099 02/09/95 000803 FLAGHOUSE, [NC. TAX
190-180-999-5301
190-180-999-5301
190-180-999-5301
63.75
7.01
4.96
22100 02/09/95 000643
22100 02/09/95 001)643
22101 02/09/95 000184
22102 02/09/95 001355
22103 02/09/95 000~81
FORTNER HANDMARE, ]NC.
FORTNER HARDMARE, INC.
G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYIq
G T E CALIFORNIA, INC.
GEOTECHNICAL & ENVIRORM
TCSD NAINT SUPPLIES
MISC. SUPPLIES FOR PM
909&99-6267GEM
FEB 95 ACCESS CHARGES
PROF. SERVICES FOR DEC 94
190-180-999-5212
100-16~-601-5218
320-199-999-5208
320-199-9~-5208
210-190-136-580~
78.40
57.90
32.40
350.00
54.00
136.30
32.~0
350.00
54.00
22106 02/09/95 000177
2210~ 02/09/95 000177
2210~ 02/09/95 000177
22106 02/09/95 000177
2210~ 02/09/95 000177
22104 02/09/95 000177
22104 02/09/95 000177
22104 02/09/95 000177
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENRIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENRIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
OFFICE SUPPLIES/BLDG & SAFETY
OFFICE SUPPLIES/BLDG & SAFETY
OFFICE SUPPLIES/TC$O
M[SC-OFFICE SUPPLIES/FINANCE
OFFICE SUPPLIES-CITY MGR DEPT
OFFICE SUPPLIES-CITY MGR DEPT
NISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES-CITY MGR DEPT
001-162-~-5220
001-162-9~-5220
190-180-999-5220
001-140-999-5220
001-110-999-5220
001-110-999-5220
340-199-99~-5262
001-110-9q~-5220
98.91
201.83
32.68
9.70
20.56
159.63
39.60
22105 02/09/95 000192
22105 02/09/95 000192
22105 02109195 000192
22105 02/09/95 000192
GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPL[E
GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE
GLOBAL COlqPUTER SUPPLIE
GLOBAL CONPUTER SUPPLIE
LASER TENT CARDS
3.5 D]SK LABELS
FREIGHT
TAX
320-199-9~-5221
320-199-9~-5221
320-19~-999-5221
320-19~-~-5221
19.99
30,99
6.98
4.28
62.24
22106 02/09/95 000178
22106 02/09/95 000178
22106 02/09/95 000178
22106 02/09/95 000178
GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO
GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO
GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO
GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO
10 KEYBOARDS
FRE I GHT
TAX
NISC COMPUTER SUPPLIES
320-19~-9(R-5221.
320-1q~-~4~-5221
320-1~-999-5221
320-1~-~-5221
200.00
10.00
15.50
310.26
22107 02/09/95 000430
22107 02/09/95 000430
22107 02/09/95 000430
22107 02/09/95 000430
22107 02/0~/95 000/,30
22107 02/C)~/95 000~30
22107 02/09/95 000/,30
22107 02/09/95 000430
22107 02/09/95 000/,30
22107 02/0~/95 000~30
22107 02/09/95 000430
22107 02/09/95 000430
GROUP AMERICA - VOLUNTA
GROUP ANER l CA - VOLUNTA
GROUP AMERICA - VOLUNTA
GROUP ANER I CA - VOLUMTA
GROUP AMERICA - VOLUNTA
GROUP AMERICA - VOLUMTA
GROUP ANER/CA - VOLUMTA
GROUP AMER/CA - VOLUMTA
GROUP NqER]CA - VOLUNTA
GROUP AMERICA - VOLUMTA
GROUP AMERICA - VOLUNTA
GROUP AMERICA - VOLUMTA
000430 VL ADVAN
000430 VOL LIFE
000430 VOL LIFE
000430 VOL LIFE
000430 VOL LIFE
000430 VOL LIFE
000430 VL REVER
000430 VOL LIFE
000430 VOL LIFE
000430 VOL LIFE
000430 VOL LIFE
000430 VOL LIFE
001-2510
001-2510
100-2510
190-2510
192-2510
3/,0-2510
001-2510
001-2510
100-2510
190-2510
192-2510
340-2510
190-18]-4982
190.80
138.91
15.1'9
29.69
6.00
190.80-
138.97
15.73
29.68
6.00
.4Z
15.00
22108 02/09/95 HAERR, DEMISE REFUND FOR TCSD CLASS
vd '1
02t, _/5
12:37
CITY OF TE14ECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERICl)S
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
22109
22110
22111
22111
22111
22111
22111
22111
22111
22112
22113
22113
22113
22113
22113
22113
22113
22113
22113
22113
22113
22113
22113
22113
22113
22113
22113
22113
22113
22113
22113
22113
22113
22113
22113
22113
22113
22113
22113
22113
CHECK
DATE
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02109/95
02/09/95
02109195
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
VENDOR
NUIiER
001697
000186
000186
000186
000186
000186
000186
000186
001536
001536
001536
001536
001536
001536
001536
001536
0015:56
001536
001536
001536
001536
001536
001536
001536
001536
001536
001536
0015:56
0015:56
001536
001536
001536
001536
001536
001536
0015~6
001536
001536
001536
001536
0015:56
000796
000194
VENDOR
NAME
HAICK, ROBERT
HALL, NANCY LEE
HANKS HARDWARE, INC.
HANKS HARDMARE, INC.
HANKS HARDMARE, INC.
HANKS HARDMARE, INC.
HANKS HARDMARE, INC.
HANKS HARDMARE, INC.
HANKS HARDMARE, INC.
HART, BETH
HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE
HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE
HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE
HARTFORD LiFE INSURANCE
HARTFORD LiFE iNSURANCE
HARTFORD LiFE INSURANCE
HARTFORD LiFE iNSURANCE
HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE
HARTFORD LiFE iNSURANCE
HARTFORD LiFE iNSURANCE
HARTFORD LIFE INSIJRANCE
HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE
HARTFORD LiFE INSURANCE
HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE
HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE
HARTFORD LIFE ZNSURANCE
HARTFORD LIFE ZNSURANCE
HARTFORD LZFE INSURANCE
HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE
HARTFORD LiFE iNSURANCE
HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE
HARTFORD LiFE INSURANCE
HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE
HARTFORD L]FE iNSURANCE
HARTFORD LiFE iNSURANCE
HARTFORD L]FE iNSURANCE
HARTFORD LiFE ]N~IJRANCE
HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE
HARTFORD LIFE IN$1JRANCE
HARTFORD LiFE INSURANCE
HARTFORD LiFE INSURANCE
HARTFORD LIFE INgJRANCE
HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE
]CBO
I c 14 A RETZREHENT TRUS
[TEN
DESCRZPTIOR
REFUND FOR TC$1) CLASS
PAYMENT TO TCSD INSTRUCTOR
NISC NAINT EQUIP SUPPLIES FIRE
TCSD NAINT SUPPLIES
NZSC MAZNT. SUPPLIES
TCSD NAiNT. SUPPLIES
MAINT. SUPPLIES-CITY HALL
TCSD NAINT SUPPLIES
NISC BUILDING NAINT SUPPLIES
REFUND FOR TCSD CLASS
001536 LIFE INS
001536 LIFE INS
001536 LIFE INS
001536 LIFE INS
001536 LIFE INS
0015:56 LIFE INS
0015~6 LIFE INS
001536 LIFE INS
0015~6 LIFE INS
001536 LIFE INS
001536 LIFE INS
001536 LTD
001536 LTD
001536 LTD
001536 LTD
001536 LTD
0015:56 LTD
001536 LTD
001536 LTD
001536 LTO
001536 LTD
001536 LTO
001536 STO
001536 STD
001536 STD
001536 STD
0015:56 STD
0015:$6 STD
001536 S113
001536 STD
001536 STD
001536 STD
001536 STD
SAN DIEGO CHAPTER FOR A. ELIO
000194 DEF CO~P
ACCOIJNT
NUMBER
190-183-4982
190-183-999-5330
001-171-999-5242
190-180-999-5212
001-162-999-524Z
190-180-999-5212
3/,0-199-999-5212
190-180-999-5212
:r~0-199-999-5212
190-183-498Z
001 -Z360
100-2~60
165-Z560
190-2360
191-2360
192-Z$60
193-2360
280-2360
300-2360
320-2360
340-2360
001
100-2]80
165-2380
190o2380
191-2380
192-2380
193-2380
280-2380
300-2380
320-2:380
3~0-2380
001-2500
100-2500
165-2500
190 - 25 O0
191-2500
192 - 25 OO
193-2500
280-2500
300-2500
320-2500
3~0-2500
001-162-999-5226
ITE14
35.00
72.00
38.33
19./x
10.18
19.38
182.45
75.89
1.92
15.00
597. O0
116.00
4.00
134.50
4.50
10.00
15.50
2.00
5.00
10.00
21.50
615.03
115.01
132.93
4.53
5.17
16.10
3.17
5.42
13.89
14.87
1,321.97
250.75
12.29
9.87
11.26
35.08
6.91
11.8~
30.28
32 .~.
25.00
1,470.97
CHECK
ANOUNT
"35. O0
72.00
347.38
15.00
3,864.33
25.OO
VOUCHRE2
02/09/95
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
2.2116
22116
22116
22116
22116
22116
22116
22116
22117
22118
22119
22119
22120
22121
22122
22123
22124
22125
22126
22126
22126
22127
22128
22129
22130
22131
22132
22133
22133
22133
22133
22133
22133
22133
12:37
CHECK
DATE
02/09/95
02/0~/~5
02/09/95
02/09/~5
02/09/~5
02/09/95
02109195
0210~195
02/0~/95
02/0~/~5
02/09/95
02/09/~5
02/09/~5
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/93
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/0~/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/0~/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/0~/95
02/0~/95
02/0~/95
02109195
02/0~/~5
VENDOR
NIJIER
000196
000196
000196
000196
000196
00019~
000194
00019/*
001429
001407
000199
000199
001651
000209
001607
001719
001513
001653
001653
001653
001311
001205
000239
O01171
O01243
0002/,6
000266
000266
0002/,6
000266
000246
000246
RETIREHENT TRUS
RET]REMENT TRUS
RETIREMENT TRUS
RET/REMENT TRUS
RET/REMENT TRUS
RETIREMENT TRUS
RETIREMENT TITUS
RETIREMENT TRUS
INACON INFORI4ATION SYST
INTER VALLEY POOL SUPPL
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVIC
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVIC
JIM DUKE SERVICE CONPAN
L & N FERTILIZER, INC.
L D D S COMMUNICATIONS,
L P A, iNC.
LEIGHLITER, SUSAN
LIBERTY AUTO CENTER
NAILER'S SOFTMARE
MAILER'S SOFTk~ARE
NAILER'S SOFTMARE
HANGUSING, STUART
MC DERNOTT, BRIDGET
MCDERMOTT, TIM K.
OLSTEN STAFFING SERVICE
ORIENTAL TRADING CO., I
PALNQUIST, N/tRY
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
00019/, DEF rOMP
00019/, DEF COMP
00019/, DEF COW
000194 DEF COMP
000194 DEF COHP
00019~ DEF COI4P
000194 DEF COle
000196 DEF COMP
UPGRD FOR i~PERFECT
MISC POOL SUPPLIES
000199 IRS GARN
000199 ]RS GARN
REPAIRS TO COFFEE BREMER
MISC EQUIP REPAIRS FOR TCSD
LONG DIST. SERVICE
DEVEL. OF CPRS AMARDS ENTRY
REFUND FOR TC$O CLASS
REPAIR/PAINT CITY MGR VEHICLE
ACCUNAIL SOFTgEAR UPDATE
FRE l GHT
TAX
ANNUAL BOOT ALL(NANCE REIME
REFUND FOR TCSD CLASS
MKSHP: CHTA 2/2-/,/95 TM
TEMP HELP M/E 1/8 GRACE
HOLIDAYS DECORATIONS,& PRIZES
PAYMENT TO TCSD INSTRUCTOR
0002/,6 PER REDE
000266 PERS RET
0002/,6 PERS RET
000246 PERS RET
000246 PERS RET
0002~6 PERS RET
0002/,6 PERS RET
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
100-2080
190-2080
191-2080
192-2080
193-2080
280-2080
300-2080
340-2080
320-199-999-5221
190-182-99~-5212
001-2160
100-21/.0
190-182-999-5212
190-180-~-5242
320-199-~-5208
1~)-180-~-5250
190-18~-6982
001-110-999-5216
320-199-~-5211
320-199-999-5211
320-199-99~-5211
001-163-99~-52/.3
190-183-6982
001-140-~-5261
001-162-~-5118
1~0-180-999-5301
190-183-999-5:530
001-2130
001-2390
165-2390
190-23~0
191-2390
192-2390
ITEM
AMOUNT
239.72
571.55
65.51
75.00
80.06
/.6.15
78.13
22.50
214.14
10~.86
88.71
88.71
61.03
156.33
1,108.09
629.7/,
35. O0
127.13
199.00
8,00
14.43
78.12
35.00
61.68
374.40
189.30
297.60
/,3.06
12,421.20
2,289.22
108,84
2,472.77
89.91
CHECK
AMOUNT
2,6~9.59
214.16
106.86
177.62
61.03
15/,.33
1,11v""'~
62~_4
35.00
127.13
221.43
78.12
35.00
61.68
374.~0
18~.30
297.60
02/, ~ ~
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUNB~R
12:37
CHECK
DATE
VENDOR
NUNBER
VENDOR
NN, E
CiTY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
22133 02/1~/~5 0002~ PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 0002~ PERS RET
22133 02/09/95 0002666 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 0002~ PERS RET
22133 02/0~/95 0002666 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 0002~ PERS MET
22133 02/0~/95 0002666 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 0002~ PERS RET
22133 02/09/95 0002666 PERS (EMPLOYEES' PET]RE 0002~ PERS RET
22133 02/09/95 0002666 PERS (EHPLOYEES' RETIRE 0002~6 SURVIVOR
22133 02/09/95 0002~6 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR
22133 02/09/95 00022~ PERS (EHPLOYEES' PETIRE 0002666 SURVIVOR
22133 02/09/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 0002'~ SURVIVOR
22133 02/0~/95 0002~ PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 0002~ SURVIVOR
22133 02/09/95 0002~6 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 0002~6 SURVIVOR
22133 02/09/95 0002~6 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIPE 0002~ SURVIVOR
22133 02/09/95 0002~ PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 0002~ SURVIVOR
22133 02/09/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 0002666 SURVIVOR
22133 02/09/95 0002666 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR
22133 02/09/~5 0002~ PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR
221:~ 02/09/95 0002665 PERS (HEALTH iNSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA SO
22134 02/0~/95 0002665 PERS (HEALTH [NSUR, PRE 0002665 AETNA SO
221:~ 02/0~/95 000245 PERS (HEALTH iNSUR, PRE 000245 BLSHIELD
.~"". 02/09/95 0002665 PERS (HEALTH INSUR, PRE 0002665 CIGNA
02/0~/95 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR, PRE 000245 CIGNA
2~ 02/09/95 000245 PERS (HEALTH iNSUR. PRE 000245 CZGNA
2212~ 02/09/95 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 CIGNA
22134 02109195 000245 PERS (HEALTH iNSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET
22134 02/09/95 000245 PERS (HEALTH iNSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET
221366 02/09/95 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET
22134 02/09/95 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET
221:54 02~09~95 0002665 PERS (HEALTH iNSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET
22134 02109195 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET
221:~ 02~09~95 0002665 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET
22134 02109195 000245 PERS (HEALTH iNSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET
22134 02109195 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSLIe. PRE 000245 KAISERSO
22134 02/09/95 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 KAISERSO
22134 02109195 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 KAISERSO
22134 02/09/95 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 KAISERSO
221:54 02/09/95 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PACIFICR
22134 02109195 0002665 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PACIFICR
22134 02~09~95 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PACIFICR
22134 02/09/95 0002665 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PACIFICR
22134 02109195 000245 PERS (HEALTH iNSUR. PRE 000245 PC
22134 02/09/95 000245 PERS (HEALTH/NSUR. PRE 000245 PERS CHO
22134 02109195 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS ClIO
22134 02109195 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS ClIO
22134 02109195 000245 PERS (HEALTH iNSUR. PRE 000245 PERS DED
22134 02109195 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS-ADN
22134 02109195 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 TArE(ARE
22134 02/09/95 0002665 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 TArE(ARE
~ 02109195 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR, PRE 000245 TAKE(ARE
02109195 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 TAKE(ARE
~, 02/09/95 0002665 PERS (HEALTH INSUR, PRE 000245 AETNA SO
ACCOUNT
NUNBER
193-Z~90
280 - 2390
300-2390
320- 2390
340- 2390
001-2390
100-2390
165-2390
1~)-23~0
191
192-23~0
280-23~0
300-23~0
320-2~0
3~0-23~0
001-2090
100-2090
001-2090
001-2090
100-2090
193-2090
300-2090
001-2090
1 O0 o 2090
165 - 2090
190-2090
191-2090
193-2090
330-2090
340-2090
001-2090
100-2090
190-2090
340-2090
001-2090
100-2090
190-2090
192-2090
001-2090
001-2090
190-2090
280-2090
001-2090
001-2090
001-2090
100-2090
280 - 20~
300-2090
001-2090
ITEM
AN(XJNT
319.65
61.17
149.51
268.21
301.05
57.95
10.78
.37
12.51
.662
1.44
.19
.~6
.93
2.00
824.25
39.81
6266.21
857.37
176.06
306.20
38.27
3,995.95
158.06
1,762.90
143,53
175
318.96
406.55
804.74
513.20
61
1,032.38
394.73
733.20
160.79
512.76
1,606.93
11.05
4.97
822.98
99.55
1,719.56
832.62
76.80
40.76
121.17
PAGE 7
CHECK
AHOUIIT
18,712,15
VOUCHRE2
02/09/95
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
22134
2213~
221:34.54
22134
22134
22134
22135
22135
22135
22135
22135
22135
22135
22135
22135
22135
22136
22137
22137
22137
22137
22137
22137
22137
22137
22137
22137
22137
22137
22138
22139
22140
22140
12:37
CHECK
DATE
02109195
02109195
02109195
02109195
02109195
02109195
02109195
02/09/95
02109195
02/0~/95
02/0~/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02109195
02109195
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/0o/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
VEMDOR
NUHBER
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000245
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000580
001537
001537
001537
001537
001537
001537
001537
001537
001537
001537
001537
001537
000255
000260
000260
VENDOR
NAME
CITY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
PEAS (HEALTH INSIJR. PRE 000245
PEAS (HEALTH INSlJR. PRE 000245
PEAS (HEALTH [NSUR. PRE 000245
PEAS (HEALTH [NSUR. PRE 000245
PEAS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245
PEAS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245
PEAS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245
PEAS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245
PEAS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245
PEAS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245
PEAS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245
PEAS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245
PEAS (HEALTH INSUP,. PRE 000245
PEAS (HEALTH INSUP,. PRE 000245
PEAS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245
PEAS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245
PEAS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245
PEAS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PHOTO ~IORKS
PRINCIPAL MUTUAL, INC.
PRINCIPAL MUTUAL, INC.
PRINCIPAL MUTUAL, INC.
PRINCIPAL MUTUAL, [NC.
PRINCIPAL MUTUAL, INC.
PRINCIPAL MUTUAL, INC.
PRINCIPAL MUTUAL, INC.
PRINCIPAL MUTUAL, INC.
PRINCIPAL MUTUAL, INC.
PRINCIPAL MUTUAL, INC.
PRINCIPAL MUTUAL, INC.
PRINCIPAL MUTUAL, INC.
PRO LOCK & KEY
PUGH, PAHELA
RAN-TEC RUBBER STAMP MF
RAN-TEC RUBBER STAMP MF
BLSH[ELD
HELTllET
HELTHNET
HELTHNET
HELTHNET
HELTHNET
KAISERSO
KAISERSO
KAISERSO
PACIFICR
PACIFICIt
PC
PEAS CHO
PEAS REV
TAKECARE
TAKECARE
TAKECARE
EMPLOYEE PAID PORTIOR(LITTELL)
PETTY CASH REIMB.
PETTY CASH REIMB.
PETTY CASH REII!.
PETTY CASH REINB.
PETTY CASH REINB.
PETTY CASH REIMB.
PETTY CASH REINB.
PETTY CASH REINB.
PETTY CASH REINIl.
PETTY CASH REINB.
FILM AND DEVELOPING
001537 DENT ADV
001537 DENTALlaN
001537 DENTALPI'I
001537 DENTALFq'I
001537 DENTALPIe
001537 DENTALPIe
001537 DENTALPN
001537 DENTALPM
OO1537 DENTALlaN
001537 DENTAL!aN
001537 DENTALIqR
001537 DENTALPH
CITY HALL LOCKSMITH SERVICES
REFUND FOR TCSl) CLASS
APPROVAL STANP/BLDG PLANS
TAX
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-2090
001-2090
100-2090
165-2090
190-2090
001-2090
190-2090
340-2090
001-2090
100-2090
001-2090
001-2090
001-2090
001-2090
100-2090
280-2090
001-1170
001 - 140-999-5220
190-183-999-5320
1 O0-164-60~-5220
001 - 140-999-5260
100-164-601-5261
1 O0 - 164 -602 - 5260
001-163-99q-5220
190-180-9<~-5220
001 - 100-9~-5220
001 - 100-(~9-5250
001 - 171-999-5250
001-1180
001-2340
100-2340
165-2~0
190-23~
191-2.~0
192-2340
193-2340
280-234,0
300-23~0
330-23~0
3~0o2340
:340-199-999-5212
190-183-4982
001-162-999-5242
001-162-999-5242
ITEM
AM(XJNT
20.45
277.18
14.11
7.81
55.18
8.10
5.92
17.87
3.15
35.26
23.32
121
43.05
822.98-
15.14
7.97
192.06
14.18
87.70
23.69
7.98
28.30
20.00
11.77
12.13
18.86
20. O0
29.82
69.5~
1,156.12
295.42
17.16
197.69
7.32
42.90
8.~
8.58
10.72
42.90
49.33
18.32
35.00
175 .SO
13.56
CHECK
MqOUNT
20,764.64
2/~.61
29.82
1,906.62
18.32
35.00
l&,..,o
02/~ ~
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
22141
22141
22141
22141
22141
22141
22141
22141
22142
22143
22164
22145
22145
22146
2c,,/
22147
22147
22147
22148
22149
22150
22151
22151
22152
22152
22152
22152
22152
22152
22152
22152
22153
22154
12:37
CHECK
DATE
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02109195
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02109195
02/09/95
02/O9/95
02/O9/95
Viii)OR
MUI!ER
000262
000262
000262
000262
000262
000262
000262
000262
000266
001169
000275
000275
000277
00070~
00070~
000704
000704
000704
00070~
000403
001546
000302
000302
001547
001547
001547
001547
001547
001547
001547
001547
000168
000307
00O876
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER
RANCHO CALIFORNIA gATER
RANCHO CAL/FORN]A MATER
RANCHO CALIFORNIA RATER
RANCHO CALIFORNIA MATER
RANCHO CALIFORNIA MATER
RANCHO CALIFORNIA MATER
RHODES, IRViN
RIGHTMAY
RIVERSIDE CO. CLERK OF
ROMERO, LUCI
Ra4ERO, LUCI
S & S ARTS AND CRAFTS,
S K S, INC/INLAND OiL
S K Se INC/INLAND OIL
S K S, ZNC/INLAND OIL
S K S, INC/INLAND OIL
S K S, INC/INLAND OIL
S K S, ]NC/INLAND OIL
SCHULTZ, VICKI
SHAtal SCOTT POOL & SPA
STRAIGHT LXNE GLASS
SYSTEM SOURCE, INC.
SYSTEM SOURCE, INC,
TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911
TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911
TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911
TEAHSTERS LOCAL 911
TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911
TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911
TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911
TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911
TEMECULA FLC/aER CORRAL
TEMECULA TROPHY CO.
TEMECULA VALLEY BALLOON
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
[TEN
DESCRIPTION
01-06-84300-1 12/14-1/16/95
01-08-18506-2 12/8-1/17/95
MATER SERVICE 12/12-1/12/95
MATER SERVICE 12/12-1/12/95
MATER SERVICE 12/12-1/12/95
MATER SERVXCE 12/12-1/12/95
MATER SERVICE lZ/12-1/12/95
MATER SERVICE 12/12-1/12/95
REFUND FOR TCSO CLASS
PORTABLE TOILET t YARD
NOT]CE OF DETERMINATION FILING
WHKSHP:PERF. NRASI. JItES 1/19 LR
WHKSHP:PERF. MEASURES 1/19 LR
SUPPLIES FOR 1401414Y & ME CLASS
FUEL EXPENSE
FUEL EXPENSE
FUEL EXPENSE
FUEL EXPENSE
FUEL EXPENSE
FUEL EXPENSE
REFUND FOR TCSU CLASS
POOL PAINT. SERVICES
]NSTALL MIRROR i CITY HALL
TABLE DESK
TAX
001547 UN DUES
001547 UN DUES
001547 UN DUES
001547 UN DUES
001547 ON DUES
001547 UN DUES
001547 UN DUES
001547 UN DUES
FLOWERS FOR EMPLOYEES
SPORTS PROGRAMS TROPHYS
TOURISM TENT SPOSORSH]P 1995
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
100-164-601-5240
190-180-999-5240
190-180-999-5240
190-181-999-5240
190-182-999-5240
191 - 180-999-5240
193-180-999-5240
7~0-199-999-5240
190-183-4966
100-164-601-5238
001-171-999-5470
001-140-999-5261
001-140-999-5262
190-183-999-5320
100-1990
001-165-999-5263
001-163-999-5263
190-180-999-5263
001-110-999-5263
001-162-999-5263
190 - 183 - 4982
190-180-999-5212
340-199-999-5212
001-140-999-5601
001-140-999-5601
001-2125
100-2125
165-2125
190-2125
191-2125
19~-2125
300-2125
320-2125
001-2170
190-183-999-5380
280-1990
ITEM
AMOUNT
16.45
39.14
701.71
432.O8
8~.39
11.27
12.00
57.39
78.00
113.00
45.60
6/,0.94
635.92
84.20
128.96
141.16
49.77
28.30
40.00
95.20
118.25
300.00
23.25
456.32
75.56
7.40
85.10
8.33
28.67
4.62
18.50
124.99
16.17
7,500.00
PAGE 9
CHECK
N~XlNT
2,207.60
12.00
57.39
158.60
640.9~
1,068.31
40.00
95.20
118.25
323.25
684.50
124.99
16.17
7,500.00
VOUCHRE2
02/09/95
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
22156
22157
22157
22157
22157
22157
22158
22159
22159
22159
22159
22159
22159
22160
22160
22160
22161
22161
22161
22161
22162
22162
22162
22162
22162
22163
22164
22165
22165
22165
22166
12:37
CHECK
DATE
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02109195
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02109195
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02109/95
02/09/95
02109/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
0Z/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
02/09/95
VENDOR
NUMBER
000306
000642
000642
000642
000642
000642
001065
001065
001065
001065
001065
001065
000389
000389
000389
000325
000525
000325
000325
000326
000326
000326
000326
000326
001076
000345
000345
000345
000346
VENDOR
NAME
TEHECULA VALLEY PIPE &
TEMECULA, CiTY OF - FLE
TENECULA, CITY OF - FLE
TE14ECULA, CITY OF - FLE
TE14ECULA, CITY OF - FLE
TENECULA~ CITY OF - FLE
TSCHANZ, PHYLLIS
CITY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
TCSD MAINT SUPPLIES
FLEX BENEFITS REINB.
FLEX BENEFITS REZNB,
FLEX BENEFITS REZNB.
FLEX BENEFITS REiNB.
JAN 95 ADJUSTMENT FOR P/R
REFUND FOR TCSD CLASS
U S C 14/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065
U S C H/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065
U S C N/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065
U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065
U S C 14/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065
U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065
u S C N/PEBSCO COBRA) 000389
U S C M/PEBSCO COBRA) 000389
u S C M/PEBSCO COBRA) 000389
DEF CONP
DEF CONP
DEF COHP
DEF CClIP
DEF COHP
DEF CONP
PT RETIR
PT RETIR
PT RET[R
UNITED gAY OF THE [NLAN 000325
UNITED MAY OF THE INLAN 000325 IN
UNITED MAY OF THE iNLAN 000325 IN
UNITED gAY OF THE INLAN 000325 UW
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
UNiTOG RENTAL SERVICE,
UNZTOG RENTAL SERVICE,
UNZTOG RENTAL SERVICE,
UNZTOG RENTAL SERVICE,
UNZTOG RENTAL SERVICE,
190-180-999-5212
laSSTERN WASTE, iNC.
001-1020
190-1020
100-1020
300-1020
001-1020
WRIGHT, NARLA
190-11G-4982
XEROX CORPORATiON B]LLI
XEROX CORPORATION B]LLi
XEROX CORPORATION BILL[
001-2080
1 O0- 2080
190-2080
300-2080
320-2080
340-2080
YATES, GRANT
001-2160
100-2160
190-2160
001-2120
100-2120
190-2120
280-2120
UNIFORMS NAINT FOR PW
UNIFORM NAINT FOR TCSD
FLOOR MATS RENTAL i CITY HALL
FLOOR MAT RENTAL t C.R.C
FLOOR MATS t SR CNTR
100-164-601-5243
190-180-999-5243
340-199-999-5250
190-182-999-5250
190-181-999-5250
PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL 8 PRKS 190-180-999-5Z.~
REFUND FOR TCSD CLASSES
190 - 183 - 4982
BLACK TONER ~f6R396 FON CSD 330-199-999-5220
LENS & MIRROR CLEANER FOR 5100 330-199-999-5220
TAX 330-199-999-5220
LUNCH REIHB FOR FINANCE OFFICE 001-140-999-5260
ITE14
N40UNT
22.81
3,372.12
95.00
30.25
12.50
8.52
40.00
2,122.08
132.25
271.50
5.01
312.50
50.00
285.54
127.06
210.98
59.35
10.05
17.00
.60
25.85
16.85
34.50
~.~
16.75
455.00
560. O0
26.00
45.42
60,00
CHECK
Nq0UNT
22.81
3,518.39
40.00
2,89'5.32
621.58
87.00
138.39
455.00
84.00
631.42
60.00
TOTAL CHECKS
114,758.94,
08:29
CITY OF TEHECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
100 GAS TAX FUND
165 RDA DEV- LOI,//ROD SET ASIDE
190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FLINO
280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP
300 INSURANCE FUND
320 ]NFORNAT]ON SYSTENS
330 SUPPORT SERVICES
3~0 FACILITIES
TOTAL
ANOUNT
66,206.53
2,916.00
60.12
9,213.90
7,757.30
20,528.13
89.43
75,105.05
508.8~
2,935.52
190,206.82
VOUCHRE2
02/16/95 08:29
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE
22167 02/14/~5
22168 02/14/95
22169 02/15/~5
22169 02/15/95
22169 02/15/95
22170 02/15/~5
22177 02/16/~5
22178 02/16/~5
22179 02/16/95
22180 02/16/~5
22180 02/16/95
22181 02/16/95
22181 02/16/95
22182 02/16/95
2218~ 02/16/95
22183 02/16/95
22183 02/16/95
2218.$ 02/16/95
22184 02/16/95
22185 02/16/95
22186 02/16/95
22186 02/16/95
22186 02/16/95
22187 02/16/95
22188 02/16/95
22189 02/16/~5
22190 02/16/95
22191 02/16/95
22192 02/16/95
221~J 02/16/95
CITY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VENDOR VENDOR
NUMBER NN4E
OVERSON, EUGENE
000740 PICCA DELl
001704
001704
001704
OLD TOgN TEMEOULA MAIN
OLD TOMN TEMECULA MAIN
OLD TOWN TEMECULA MAIN
0001~ COSTCO UHOLESALE CORPOR
000?24 A & R OUSTON SCREEN PRZ
001425 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR CORP.
000102 N~ERICAN FENCE CO. OF C
000101 APPLE ONE, INC,
000101 APPLE ONE, INC.
000622 BANTA ELECTRIC-REFRIGER
000622 BANTA ELECTR/C-REFRIGER
000402 BERG,/U~RK
000679
000679
000679
000679
BOGRAPH/CS PRINTING PLU
BOGRAPHICS PRINTING PLU
BOGRAPHICS PRINTING PLU
BOSRAPHICS PRINTING PLU
000128
000126
000126
000126
000127
001723
000489
001029
001673
001724
001722
ITEM
DESCR I PT l OR
REPLACE CK 13216 DATED 5/27/92
LURCH FOR SNYDER LANGSTON MEET
COOPERAT]VE AOREEMENT
ADVERT]NG COST-PROGRAM D[RECTO
ADVERT/NG COST-PROSRAN DIRECTO
CABINETS FOR FIRE DEPT.
SPORTS PROGRANS AgARDS
6015202 TH
TEMP FENCE RENTAL -FEB 95
TEMP HELP g/E 1/28 SUTTON
TENP HELP g/E 2/4 BUTTOM
ELECTRICAL MAINTENANCE
ELECTRICAL MAINTENANCE
ANNUAL MORK BOUT ALLCNANCE
2 SHEETS PHOTO READY LOGO 3"
2 SHEETS PHOTO READY LOGO 2"
1 SHEET PHOTO READY LOGO 1"
TAX
REFUND FOR TCSD CLASS
BOLLENS, REBECCA
CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES,
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA EXTRA VORK t NEIGHBORHOOD PRKS
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA EXTRA VORK t NEIGHBORHOOD PRKS
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA EXTRA M3RK i NEIGHBORHO00 PRKS
CALIFORNIAN, INC. -LEGA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEANINGS
CHACOR, DAVID
CO~B OROUP, THE
DATAIJICK, INC.
DIVERSIFIED TEMPORARY S
DORBS, ODLLEEN
EDMARDS, SALLY
ACCOUNT
NONBER
1~0-180-4060
001-110-~-5260
280 - 1 ~90
001 - 150-~-5222
001 - 150-~9-5254
'001-171 -~-5470
190-183-999-5380
320-199-9q~-5208
1~0-180-99~-52)8
330-1q~-~-5118
330-199-999-5118
190-180-9F~-5212
190-180-999-5212
001-162-99~-5243
330-1~-~-5220
5"50-199-~-5220
330-1F}-~-5220
330-1 ~-~)~-5220
190-183-4982
PUBLIC OFFICIAL BOND:R.BRADLEY 300-1~-~-5200
1~0-180-999-5415
190-180-~9~-5415
190-180-~9~-5415
001-161-~-5256
PNT FOR TCSD ]NSTRUCTOR 190-183-999-5330
INSIDE OUATTRO PRO: 12 ISSUES )20-1~-;-5228
FEB 95 ACCESS CHARGES 320-1~9-;-5250
TEMP HELP WE 1/26 FRITCHEY 001-161-~9~-5118
PMT FOR TCSU INSTRUCTOR 190-18)-~99-5330
Iq4T FOR TCSO INSTRUCTOR 1~0-183-~-5330
I T EM
AMOUNT
82.02
77.04
73,000.00
299.01 -
618.87-
290.~0
879.24
58.89
145.00
361.20
361.20
68.15
286.00
95.00
15.00
15.00
10.00
3.10
55. O0
500.00
454. O0
347.50
869.50
16.65
192.00
49. O0
85.24
14~.48
112.00
272.00
CHECK
AHOUNT
'.U.02
77.04
~,~2.12
2~.90
879.~
58.~
145.00
722.40
43.10
55.00
500.00
1,671.00
16.65
1~.~
1~.~
112.00
02/. ,~
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
2219~
22194
221~5
221~
22197
22197
22197
22197
22197
22197
22199
22200
22200
22201
2220'1
22201
22201
22202
22203
2220/,
22205
22206
22206
22207
22208
22209
22210
22210
CHECK
DATE
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VENDOR VENDOR ]TEN
NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION
000754 ELLIOTT GRCUP, THE
000754 ELLIOTT GROUP, THE
PLAN CK SERVICES FOR DEC 9~
PLAN CK SERVICES FOR JAN 95
ELLISON, VALERIE
REFUI) FOR TCSO CLASS
000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. EXPRESS PAIL SERVICE
001002
001002
001002
001002
001002
001002
FIRST INTERSTATE BANK C 5473 666~ 0391 0099 JS
FIRST INTERSTATE RANK C REFUND OPENING BALANCE
FIRST iNTERSTATE RANK C 5473 6664 0391 0172 RB
FIRST INTERSTATE BANK C 5473 6664 0391 0172 RB
FIRST INTERSTATE BANK C 5473 6664 0391 0115 JG
FIRST INTERSTATE BANK C 5473 6664 0391 0057 SN
000993 FREEDOM COFFEE, INC. COFFEE SUPPLIES CITY HALL
FREITAS, KRISTIRA
REFUND FOR TCSO CLASS
000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909 694-6400 GEM
00018~ G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909 695-3539 GRN
000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909 699-0128 GEM
00018~ G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909 699-2309 GEM
000178 GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO REPAIR PARTS FOR MONITOR
000178 GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO LABOR CHARGE FOR MONITOR REPAR
000178 GOLDEN STATE TRN)]NG CO FREIGHT
000178 GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO TAX
GRANA, KERRY
REFUND FOR TCSD CLASS
001517 HEALTH & HUMAN RESOURCE EMPLOYEE ASS/STANCE PROGRAM
IAEI
gKSHP: 1&2 FAMILY DgELLING JR
001429 ]MACON ]NFORPAT]ON SYST SOFTWARE: PRINT SHOP DELUXE
001123 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIE PAINT CREW SUPPLIES
001123 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIE TAX
000209 L & M FERTILIZER, INC. MISC PAINT SUPPLIES
0015:3~ LA PASTERS OF FINE TRAV R.RORERTS FLT RALTINORE 3/9-15
001658 LIENHARD CONSULTING ORO COleUTER TRAINING ON-SITE
000214 LUNCH & STUFF CATERING CITY COUNCIL MEETING 2/14/95
000214 LUNCH & STUFF CATERING ECONOMIC GROUP MEETING 2/14/95
001531 PALEK, SUSAN
PMT FOR TCSD INSTRUCTOR
001142 liARKHAN & ASSOCIATES PROF. SERVICES FOR JAN 95
ACC~_NT
NI. NBER'
001-161-999-5250
001-161-999-5250
190-18~-4982
320-199-999-5230
001-100-999-5258
001-140-999-5226
001-110-999-5228
001-110-999-5260
001-120-999-5258
190-180-999-5260
340-199-999-5250
190-183-4982
320-199-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
320-199-999-5215
320-199-999-5215
320-199-999-5215
320-199-999-5215
190-18~-4982
001-150-999-5248
001-162-999-5261
320-199-999-5221
100-16~-601-5218
100-164-601-5218
100-164-601-5218
001-100-999-5258
320-199-999-5250
001-100-999-5260
280-199-999-5250
190-183-999-5330
100-164-603-5248
ITEM
AMOUNT
1,210.00
3,~40.00
55.00
6.75
199.86
40.00-
60.45
42.00
131.73
40.38
132.20
55.00
~47.77
39.81
1,6~8.68
35.64
45. OO
210.00
20.00
3.49
35.00
328.25
129.00
69~.24
53.73
31.19
373. O0
900.00
80.00
32.50
168.00
62,13
PAGE
CHECK
AMOUNT
4,650.00
55. O0
6.75
434.42
132.20
55.00
2,161,90
278.49
35
328.25
129.00
89.73
7~6.97
31.19
373.00
900,00
112.50
168.00
62.13
VOUCHRE2
02/16/~5
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NU!eER
22213
22213
22213
22213
22214
22215
22216
22216
22217
22217
22217
22217
22217
22217
22217
22217
22217
22217
22217
22218
22218
22219
22220
22221
22221
22221
22221
22222
22222
22222
22222
222:r4
22223
22223
22224
22225
22225
22226
08:29
CHECK
DATE
02116/95
02116/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16195
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
VENDOR
NU!~ER
000219
000219
000219
000219
001242
001242
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000580
000580
000254
000947
000262
000262
000262
000262
0009O7
000907
000907
000907
000~26
000426
000353
000353
000~18
VENDOR
NAME
MARTIN 1-HOUR PHOTO
lIARTIN 1-HOUR PHOTO
MARTIN 1-HOUR PHOTO
MARTIN 1-HOUR PHOTO
MC DERHOTT, BRIDCtT
MOROZ, CONNIE
NATIONAL TECHNICAL INFO
NATIONAL TECHNICAL INFO
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PHOTOMIRKS
PHOTOMORKS
PRESS-ENTERPRiSE CONPAN
RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C
RANCHO CALIFORNIA MATER
RANCHO CALIFORNIA MATER
RANCHO CALIFORNIA MATER
RANCHO CALIFORNIA MATER
RANCHO CAR MASH
RANCHO CAR MASH
NANCHO CAR MASH
RANCHO CAR MASH
RANCHO INDUSTRIAL $UPPL
NANCHO INDUSTRIAL $UPPL
NANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL
RIVERSIDE CO NATIONAL D
RIVERSIDE CO. AUDITOR
RIVERSIDE CO. AUDITOR
RIVERSIDE CO. CLERK AND
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTZON
PHOTO DEVELOPING & FILM
PHOTO DEVEL. FOR LAND DIVISION
PHOTO DEVEL FOR CAPITAL PRJTS
PHOTO DEVEL FOR MAINT DIVISION
REFUND FOR TCSD CLASS
REIMB. FOR EXERCISE VIDEO
STANDARD INIXISTRIAL CLASS NANU
STANDARD INTRIAL CLASS MAIN
PETTY CASH REIMB.
PETTY CASH REIll.
PETTY CASH REIMB.
PETTY CASH REINB.
PETTY CASH REINB.
PETTY CASH REINB.
PETTY CASH REINB.
PETTY CASH REIMB.
PETTY CASH REINB.
PETTY CASH REIMB.
PETTY CASH REIMB.
FILM AND SLIDE DEVELO!~ENT
FILM AND SLIDE DEVELOPMENT
DISPLAY AD OLD TOgN PROJECT
BLUEPRINT REPRODUCTION
01-08-18505-2 1218-1117195
MATER SERVICE 12/22 - 1124195
MATER SERVICE 12/22 - 1/24/95
MATER SERVICE 12/22 - 1/24/95
CAR UASH & MAINT FOR LAND DEVE
CAR MASH & NAINT. FOR CIP
CAR MASH & MAINT FOR B & S
CAR MASH & MAINT FOR TCSD
SR CNTR BUILDING SLIPPLIES
SR CNTR BUILDING SUPPLIES
TCSD BUILDING MAINT SUPPLIES
TCSO FIELD TRIP - 02123195
PARKING CITATION ASSESS JAN 95
PARKING CITATION ASSESS JAN 95
NICROFICHE DUPLICATES
ACCOUNT
NUMBER'
100-164-602-5250
001-163-999-5250
001-165-999-5230
100-16~-601-5250
190-183-4982
190-183-~-5320
001-140-999-5220
001-110-999-5220
001-140-999-5220
001-161-999-5260
001-150-999-5265
001-150-999-5220
190-180-999-5260
001-100-999-5260
320-199-999-5220
001-162-999-5260
100-16/.-602-5260
100-164-604-5220
001-163-999-5242
190-180-999-5301
190-180-t~9-5301
001-120-999-5254
210-165-625-5802
190-180-999-5240
190-180-999-5240
191-180-999-5240
193-180-999-5240
001-163-999-5214
001-165-999-5214
001-162-999-5214
190-180-999-5214
190-181-999-5212
190-181-999-5212
190-180-999-5212
190-183-999-5350
001-2260
001-2265
001-163-999-5220
ITEM
AMOUNT
12.83
83.92
61.94
65.47
70.00
14.95
26.65
55.00
86.67
8.35
20. O0
2.00
21.14
4,8.47
30.00
40.9~
32.28
10.76
19.59
45.60
46.55
39.14
55.53
54.66
632.73
12.30
4.00
8.00
8.00
139.86
134.07
150.96
90.00
290.00
250.00
5.00
CHECK
AHOUNT
224.16
70.00
14.95
68.00
37'i ..~Y
30.35
45.60
~6.55
762.06
32,30
424.~
~.~
vC(
02/
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUllER
22227
22228
22229
22230
22230
22231
22231
22232
22233
2223/,
22234
22234
2223~
22234
22234
222.~
2223~
22235
22236
22236
22236
22236
22236
22236
22236
22236
22236
22236
22236
22236
22236
22236
22236
22236
22236
08:29
CHECK
DATE
02/16/~5
02/16/95
02/16/g5
02/16/~5
02/16/~5
02/16/~5
02/16/~5
02/16/~5
02/16/95
02/16/g5
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/~5
02/16/g5
02/16/~5
02/16/~5
02/16/~5
02/16/g5
02/16/~5
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
VENDOR
NLNBER
001169
000268
000269
000269
000277
000824
000537
000537
000537
000537
000537
000537
000537
000537
000537
000537
000537
000537
000~26
000375
000375
000375
000375
000375
000375
000375
000375
000375
000375
000375
000375
000375
000375
000375
000375
000375
000375
VENDOR
NANE
RIVERSIDE CO. CLERK OF
RIVERSIDE CO. HABITAT
RIVERSIDE CO. NATIONAL
RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY
RIVERSIDE OFFICE $tJPPLY
ROORIGUEZ, HECTOR & AlE
RODRIGUEZ, HECTOR&RNE
S & S ARTS AND CRAFTS,
SOUTHERN CALIF ASS(X: OF
SOUTHERN CAL]F ED/SON -
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON -
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON -
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON -
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON -
SOUTHERN CALIF BISON -
SOUTHERN CALIF EDZSON -
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON -
SOUTHERN CAL[F EDISON -
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON -
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON -
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON -
SOUTHERN CAL]F EDISON -
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHOR
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHOR
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CAL[F TELEPHOR
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHOR
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CAL]F TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CAL[F TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHOR
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
CITY OF TENEOULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIOOS
ITEN
DESCRIPTION
RESEARCH TR19872 PALA RD BRDGE
K-RAT FOR DEC 94/JAN 95
TCSD FIELD TR[P- 2/21/95
COLOR COPY PAPER STOCK
TAX
TCSD TAX REFUND FY ffe-95
TCSD TAX REFUND FY 94-95
lIPPLIES FOR NOMMY & lIE,
IKSHP: SCAG 3/2-3/95 RON PARKS
ELECT FOR ST L]GHTS 12/31-1/31
ELECT FOR ST LIGHTS 12/31-1/31
52-77-7W>-7050-02 1/4-2/2/95
52-77-812-gB&1-01 1/4 - 2/2/95
52-77-899-0011-02 1/4 -2/2/95
52-77-8~-1f35-02
52-77-8~-2622-02 1/4-2/2/95
53-77-800-1403-01 1/5-2/2/95
53-77-850-2948-01 1/4-2/3/95
53-77-850-57V5-01 1/4-2/3/95
56-77-755-0157-01 1/10-2/7/95
56-77-755-0169-01 1/10-2/7-95
lETALL ELECT i NARAGITA RD
t 202-4204 KL
909 202-4762 RP
~89 202-4758 RR
f09 202-4761 ge
989 205-4070 MJM
f89 202-4757 JG
989 205-7826 GR
~89 202-5153 GY
~89 202-476~ BB
el9 202-4765 BB
~9 202-4760 JH
989 206-0992 BH
re9 202-4755 CITY VAN
~8~ 202-4754 KH
I 312-0474 SN
~8~ 202-4759 TE
fO~ 202-476~ JS
fO~ 202-4770 RB
re9 202-4756 KRTM UNASSIGNED
ACCOUNT
NtAqBER
001 - 163-~-5220
001-2300
190-183-999-5350
330-1999- 999- 5220
330-199-999-5220
190 - 180 - 4005
191-180-4003
1~0-183-~q~-5320
001-100-~-5258
191-180-999-5319
192-180-999-5319
190-180-999-5240
190-180-999-5240
lg3-180-~-5240
lf0-180-~-5240
193-180-~-5240
191-180-~-5319
191-180-~-5319
191-180-~-5240
191-180-~-5319
191-180-~-5319
210-165-6~2-5804
001-100-~-5208
001-100-~-5208
001-100-~-5208
001-100-~-5208
001-110-~-5208
001-120-~-5208
001-140-~-5208
001-150-~-5208
100-164-601-5208
100-164-681-5208
100-164-683-5208
1~0-180-~-5208
190-180-999-5208
1~0-180-~-5208
1~0-180-f~-5208
001-162-~-5208
001-100-~-5208
001-110-~-5208
320-199-~-5208
ITEM
N~UNT
5.30
54,7~5.00
90.00
399. O0
30.92
246.38
15
42.97
60,00
7,252.61
20,520.17
729.62
16.55
15.95
6~.8,?.
15
39.69
46.25
16.50
206.27
6Z.Tg
42
52.78
83.72
54.64
141.35
114.95
43.49
92.90
179.68
56.27
111.01
53.33
52.~0
131,41
8O .30
71.25
40.22
36.35
PAGE 4
CHECK
· * 5.30
54,795.00
90.00
429.92
261.64
42.97
60.00
28,g86.17
42.88
1,533.25
VOUCHRE2
02/16/~5
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUHBER
22237
22237
22238
22239
22240
22240
222/,0
22240
22240
22240
22240
22240
22240
22240
22240
22240
22240
22241
22242
22243
22244
22245
22246
22247
22248
22248
22249
22250
22251
22252
22252
22252
08:29
CHECK
DATE
02116195
02116195
02116195
02116195
02116/95
02116/95
02/16195
02/16/95
02116195
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
02/16/95
VENDOR
NUHBER
000282
000282
000291
000293
000294
000294
000294
000294
000294
000294
000294
000294
00029~
000294
00029~
00029/,
000294
000A65
001497
000305
000307
001487
000320
000326
000326
000345
000345
000345
CITY OF TENECtJLA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PER[OI)S
SOUTHERN CALIF. NIJNICIP
SOUTHERN CALIF. INNICIP
SPEE DEE OIL CHANGE & T
STADIUM PIZZA
STATE FUND - SAN FRANCZ
STATE FUND - SAN FRANCI
STATE FUND - SAN FRANCZ
STATE FUND - SAIl FRANCI
STATE FUND - SAN FRANC/
STATE FUND - SAN FRANC/
STATE FUND o SAN FRANCI
STATE FUND - SAN FRANCI
STATE FUND - SAN FRANCI
STATE FUND - SAN FRANCI
STATE FUel) - SAN FRANCI
STATE FUND - SAN FRANCI
STATE FUND - SAN FRANCI
STRADLEY, MARY KATHLEEN
SUSIE'S OFFICE SUPPORT
T R g, INC.-INFORMATION
TARGET STORE
TENEOULA TROPHY CO.
TIERRA MECHANICAL, INC.
ITEN
DESCRIPTION
VOLLEYBALL RULEBCX:)KS
SOFTBALL RULEBOOKS
OIL CHANGE FOR B&S VEHICLE
STATE OF THE CITY LUNCHEON
WORKERS' COHP. FOR JAN 95
UORKERS' COMP. FOR JAN 95
WORKERS' C(NP. FOR JAN 95
UORKERS' CONP, FOR JAN 95
I)RKERS' COMP, FOR JAN 95
WORKERS' COI4P. FOR JAN 95
WORICERS' COHP. FOR JAN 95
tI)RKERS' COHP. FOR JAN 95
WORKERS' CCl4P. FOR JAN 95
UORKERS' COMP. FOR JAN 95
M3RICERS' C014P. FOR JAN 95
WORKERS' COMP. FOR JAN 95
MORKERS' COHP. FOR JAN 95
PHT FOR TCSD INSTRUCTOR
REFUND OF BUSINESS LICENSE
RDA CREDIT REPORTS INFORMATION
RECREATION SUPPLIES
SPORTS PROGRN~S AMARDS
SR CNTR HEAT SYSTEN EVALUATION
TOWNE CENTER STATIONERS OFFICE SUPPLIES/PW
UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE,
UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE,
VOLLINTH, MARY
WELLS, HEATHER
WHITEHEN), RNONDA
XEROX CORPORATION BILLI
XEROX CORPORATION BILLI
XEROX CORPORATION BILLI
UNIFORN MAINT FOR TCSD
UNIFONHS MAINT PW
REFUND FOR TCSD CLASS
REFUND FOR TCSD CLASS
PHT FOR TCSD INSTRUCTOR
HETER USAGE FOR 12/27-1/26/95
FAX IMAGING CARTRIDGE REFILLS
TAX
TOTAL CHECKS
ACCOUNT
NUNBER
190-182-999-5220
190-182-999-5220
001-162-999-5214
001 - 150-999-5265
:100-2370
165-2370
191-2370
192-2370
280 - 23 70
300-2370
320-2370
330-2370
340-2370
001-1182.
190-183-999-5330
001-199-4056
280-199-999-5250
190-180-999-5301
190-183-999-5:380
190-181-999-5212
100-164-60~-5220
190-180-999-5243
100-16~-601-5243
190-183-4982
190-183-4982
190-183-999-5330
330-199-999-5239
330-19~-999-5220
330-199-999-5220
ITER
ANOUNT
30.00
434.00
20.99
323.40
3,329.28
1,541.31
40.12
1,435.61
8~.27
7.96
118.49
22.55
8.84
21.41
281.78
56.90
320.00
35.00
50,00
43.11
19.40
135.00
14.71
16,85
23.50
65.00
35.00
1,389.27
321.00
24.88
CHECK
AMOUNT
464.00
20of9
323.40
6,952.47
35.00
50.00
43.11
19.40
135.00
14.71
40,35
~.~
35.~
304.00
1,735.15
v~/'''' ~
FUND
001
07:51
T|TLE
GENERAL FUND
TOTAL
CITY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PER[QOS
ANOUIIT
429,6.:.t4.74
429,634.74
PAGE
VOUCHRE2
02/21/95 07:51
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR
NUMBER DATE NI.14BER
22281 02/17/95 00179~
22282 02/17/95 001805
22283 02/17/95 O01
22284 02/17195 O01823
22285 02/17/95 001834
22286 02/17/95 001801
22287 02/17/95 001783
22288 02/17/95
22289 02/17/95
22290 02/17/95
22291 02/17/95 001849
22292 02/17/95 001797
22293 02/17/95 001861
22294 02/17/95 001773
22295 02/17/95 O01795
22296 02/17/95 0018~1
22297 02/17/95 001768
22298 02/17/95 O01832
22299 02/17/95 001791
22300 02/17/95 001777
22301 02/17/95 00177V
22302 02/17/95 0017~,G
22303 02/17/95 001756
2230~ 02/17/95 001820
22305 02/17/g5 001778
22306 02/17/95 001852
VENDOR
NAME
AFENIR, RICHARD k/& NIC
ALLEN, BURTON D & MARY
ALLEN, IJILLIAH E & CARO
ATKINSON, DAVID N
BABER, TERESE J
BAGSBY, SHEBALD
BALL, ALVIN R.
001856 BANK OF ARERICA NATL TR
001833 BARGIELSK[, SHEAR1A
001800 BASSLEA, JARES R & KATH
BECHTOLD, RUTH A
BEDELL, JARES A
BEDFORD DEVELOPNENT CO
BELLANY, ROBERT E & NYL
BELLAVANCE, DONALD
BLASCO, DAVID A & SUSAN
BOTTIN0, SUSAN C &gARR
BRISENDINE, SHIZU
BURGER, CHRIST]NA R
CAHACHO, NEWTON K
CARRASCO, ENRIQUE S & A
CARUSO, CHARLES A.
CLARK, PORTER A & LUCIL
CLARKSON, ANITA T
COHARD, DENNIS E & JANI
C(X3K, CARAlE L
CITY OF TEHECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
[TEN
DESCRIPTION
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASS]STANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASS]STANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASS]STANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
ACCOUNT
NUNBER
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
001-20]0
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
O01 - 2030
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
[TEN
AHOUNT
200.70
200.70
200.70
200.70
200.70
200.70
200.70
2,670.86
200.70
200.70
200.70
200.70
12,187.42
200.70
200.70
200.70
200.70
200.70
200.70
200.70
200.70
200.70
200.70
200.70
200.70
200.70
CHECK
AHOUNT
200.70
200.70
200.70
200.70
200.70
200.70
200.70
2,670.86
200.70
200.70
2F..-..~.
20u.~O
12,187.42
200.70
200.70
200.70
200.70
200.70
200.70
200.70
200.70
200.70
200.70
~ ....0
021, . .j 07:51
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK
NUNBER DATE
22307 02117195
27'400 02/17/95
22309 02/17/~5
22310 02/17/95
22311 02117195
22312 02/17/95
22313 02/17/95
22314 02/17/95
22315 02/17/95
22315 02/17/95
22316 02/17/95
02/17/95
22318 02/17/95
22319 02/17/95
22320 02/17/95
22321 02/17/95
22322 02117/95.001755
22323 02/~7/95 0018~0
22324 02/17/95
22325 02/17/95
22326 02/17/95
22~27 02/17/95
22328 02/17/95
22329 02/17/95
22~30 02/17/95
/---~.
02/17/95
VENDOR VENDOR
NUIIER RANE
001733 COUNTRY~IDE FUNDING COR
001749 DALLY TRUST
001761 DARRACH, gILL[AN J,
001735 DEL TACO RESTAURANT PRO
001793 DESCHAIR, JACQUES & L
001764 DIAZ, AUSENCIO & ELVA A
001789 DOERR, JOSEPH R
001830 DONALDSON, HILLARY H
001726 ELI LILLY & CONPANY
001726 ELI LILLY & CONPANY
001810 FINN, DANIEL F & NICOLE
001826 FINNEGAN, SCOTT R
001792 FUENTEZ, TRAVIS L
001818 GABBARD, KARYN L
00180~ GEBAUER, W[LLIAN A
001725 GORDON, SARA L.
GOSCH TRUST
GOULD, L]NMOOD P
001812 GREGORY, THONAS L
0018~& ORGAS, DOROTHY
001851 OUERRERO, ELISA N
001853 HARRISON, JOHN R & JUDY
001828 HATHCOCK, DONALD L & IS
00182Z HAZLETT, CHRIST]NE A
0017~ HENDERSON, DAVID & KATH
001817 HODGES, HARK S
CITY OF TENEOULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PER[COS
ITEH
DESCRIPTION
GALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX US]STANCE
GALES TAX ASSISTANCE
GALES TAX ASSISTANCE
GALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
GALES TAX ASSISTANCE
GALES TAX ASS[STANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASS]STANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASS]STANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
GALES TAX ASS]STANCE
SALES TAX ASS]STANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
GALES TAX ASSISTANCE
ACCOUNT
NUNBER
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
O01 - 2030
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
ITBI
NIOUNT
401.40
200.70
200.70
2,255.97
200.70
200.70
200.70
200.70
11,176.13
5,700.38
200.70
200.70
200.70
200.70
200.70
200°70
1,053.~6
200.70
200.70
200.70
200.70
6,327,09
200.70
200.70
200.70
200.70
PAGE
CHECK
NIXJIlT
'401.40
200.70
200.70
2,255 .~7
200.70
200.70
200.70
200.70
16,88~.51
200.70
200.70
200.70
200.70
200.70
1,053./,6
200.70
200.70
200.70
6,321.09
200.70
200.70
200.70
VOUCHRE2
02/21/95
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUI, IER
22~32
22333
22334
22335
22336
22337
22338
223~0
223~0
223~2
223~3
ZZ3~z,
223~5
22346
223~7
223~8
223~9
22350
22351
22352
22353
22356
22355
22~56
07:51
CHECK
DATE
02/17/95
02/17/95
02/17/95
02/17/95
02/17/95
02/17/95
02/17/95
02/17/95
02/17/95
02/17/95
02/17/95
02/17/95
02/17/95
02/17/95
02/17/95
02/17/95
02/17/95
02/17/95
02/17/95
02/17/95
02/17/95
02/17/95
02/17/95
02/17/95
02/17/~5
02/17/95
VEIl)OR
NUNBER
0017'~
001827
001835
001766
001775
001787
001737
001829
001858
001858
001762
001765
001846
001730
001838
001763
001850
001826
001728
001803
001774
O01Trl
0018~8
001739
001762
VENDOR
NANE
HONE SAV]NGS OF ANERZCA
HULL, NARK H & BETTE J
J/DOT, VALER]E S
JOHNSON, CAROL A
JOHNSTON, JOSEPH R & CA
ERR, BARBARA L
IOU, RT CORPORAT ! ON
KORNAY, STEVE D & CAR!~
KR PALN PLAZA LTD PARTN
KR PALM PLAZA LTD PARTN
KREUTZER~ KURT J & KELL
LEZSTEN, C[NDY R.
LUFKIN, DONNA L
I(ARUBEN! NOTOR SERVICE,
HAUCER], PAT
HAURICE, DAVZD
NCGUIRE, THOMAS P
MCKEONN, GREGORY S & TA
NERVYNS
NEYER, D[ANE E
NICHALEK, CHARLENE
NIMUTELLZ, VINCENT d &
NORRO~, PHYLL]S L
NUNOZ, JOSE &ARTURO
NYERS, VZCK/ 'TRUSTEE'
NORTH COUNTY BANK
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PER[OI)S
ITEM
DESCR]PTION
SALES TAX ASS]STANCE
SALES TAX ASS]STANCE
SALES TAX ASS]STANCE
SALES TAX ASS]STANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
O01 - 2030
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
001 - 2030
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
001-20~0
001-2030
001-2030
ITEM
AI~UNT
1,918.87
200.70
200.70
200.70
200.70
200.70
18,773.82
200.70
71,490.90
166.39
200.70
200.70
200.70
8,220.03
200.70
200.70
200.70
200.70
16,691.92
200.70
200.70
200.70
200.70
200.70
1,607.70
CHECK
ANOUNT
1,918.87
200.70
200.70
200.70
200.70
200.70
18,Tr5.82
200.70
71,6~7.29
200.70
200.70
8,220.03
200.70
200.70
200.70
200.70
16,691.92
200.70
200,70
200.70
200.70
V~ "
02f~_.t5 07:51
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK
NIJNBER DATE
22357 02/17/95
22358 02/17/95
22359 02/17/95
22~60 02/17/95
22361 02/17/95
22362 02117195
22~6) 02/17/95
22364 02/17/95
22365 02/17/95
2~ 02/17/95
22..?~5 02/17/95
' 02/17/95
22368 02/17/95
22368 02/17/95
22369 02/17/95
22)70 02/17/95
22371 02/17/95
22372 02/17/95
22373 02/17/95
22~74 02/17/95
22375 02/17/95
22376 02/17/95
22377 02/17/95
22378 02/17/95
2237~ 02/17/95
;a----', 02/17/95
Z,..__, 02/17/95
CiTY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VENDOR VENDOR
IitJI~ER NN~E
001814 MORTON, JOHN S & UALTER
001815 ONG, JERRY C
0018~5 OSBORNE, LOURENA K
001790 PACHECO, DAVID E
001808 PARSORS, TAINY L
001780 PATCHEN, DONALD L & DIA
001767 PHILLIPS, DALE B & KATZ
001831 PIERCE, JON & PATRICIA
001807 PORTILLO, JAINE G & ROI4
001759 RANCHO CALiF DEV CO.
001759 RANCHO CALIF DEV CO.
001854 RANCHO 140BILE HOHE ESTA
001860 RANCHO REGIONAL SHOPPIN
001860 RANCHO REGIONAL SHOPPIN
001760 RANCON REALTY FUND IV
001752 REEVES, DONNA L.
001811 RIDDLE, LOUIS W JR &
001750 RIVERSIDE FINANCIAL
0018Z,~ ROOK, MICHAEL C & TRACE
001776 ROTH, DONALD T & MINDY
001782 ROVE, THOHAS C & HELEN
001731 RUBI, FRED A & INA H &
001788 RUSSELL, BOBBY L & LAUR
001859 SAFEUAY STORES, INC,
001839 SALAZAR, RICHARD A & CY
001745 SAN DIEGO TRUST & SAVIN
001813
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTAliCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTAlICE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASS]STANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASS]STANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SANTY, ROBERT A & D]ANE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
ACCOUNT
NUHeER
001-2030
001-20~0
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
001-2~0
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
iTEM
N4OUNT
200.70
200.70
200.70
200.70
200.70
200.70
200.70
200.70
200.70
57,203.11
27,273.72
1,W~6,57
76,9'56.35
21,364.87
1,717,97
7,156,87
200.70
3,211.20
200.70
200.70
200.70
200.70
200.70
32,543.01
200.70
200.70
PAGE
CHECK
AIIOUNT
200.70
200.70
200.70
200.70
200.70
200.70
200.70
200.70
200.70
84,476.83
1,966.57
98,301.22
1,717.97
7,156.87
200.70
~,211.20
200.70
200.70
200.70
200,70
200.70
32,543.01
200.70
200.70
VOUCHRE2
02/21/95 07:51
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK
NUIqBER DATE
22382 02/17/95
22.383 02/17/95
2238,A. 02/17/95
22385 02/17/95
22386 02117/95
22387 02/17/95
22388 02/17/95
22.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'~902/17/95
22390 02/17/95
22391 02/17/95
22392 02/17/95
22393 02117195
2239/, 02/17/95
22395 02/17/95
22396 02/17/95
22396 02/17/95
22397 02/17/95
22398 02/17/95
22399 02/17/95
22~.00 02/17/95
22~.01 02/17/95
22/,02 02/17/95
22/,03 02/17/95
22/,0/+ 02/17/95
22/,05 02/17/95
22z,06 02/17/95
CITY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VENDOR VENDOR
NtNBER NANE
001821 SCARBOROUGH, TRACY A
001785 SCOTT, RYAN
001825 SEGURA, EDgARD
001847 SEgUE]RA, DARYL A & JOA
001772 SHERATON, ELIZABETH A,
001816 SHERROD, JANES S
001806 SICIL]ANO, CHARLES A &
O01T/'O SITZ, JANES
001729 SPEHAR, RAYNOND G & EST
001751 STALLING, CARLA
001802 STE~/ART, JOSEPH C & JEA
001752 STU~PH, KATHY
00179~ SUNDALE, ERiC S & RACHE
001753 TAVAGLZONE, NICHOLAS E
001738 TO~OND PROPERTIES
0017'58 TOHOND PROPERTIES
0018~7 VEASEY, KENNETH
001781
001786
001842
001784 UARDEN, CHESTER H
00175/~ gE[NGART, HAROLD V & RU
0017~8 I~ELD, LINDA N
00180/, gELLENBRINK, NDgARD t4 &
001857 tJELLS FARGO RANK RATL A
0018~ ~/ILSON, HAUREEN A
ITEN
DESCRIPTION
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
VEDENTI, JANES I. SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
VINCENT, CLAYTON P & TA SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
HALTER, HARVEY L & SUSA SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
O01 o 2030
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
ITEM
AMOUNT
200.70
200.70
200.70
200.70
200.70
200.70
200.70
200.70
2,852.38
200.70
200.70
200.70
200.70
1,20~..20
9,065.72
390.19
200.70
200.70
200.70
200.70
200.70
200.70
200.70
200.70
3,811.81
200.70
CHE~
AMOUNT
200.70
2~.70
200.70
200.~
200.70
200.70
200.70
2,~2.38
200.70
2,---~
20u.rO
200.70
1,2~.~
9,455.91
200.70
200.70
200.70
200.70
200.70
3,811.81
vd
o2/~ ./~ o?:51
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE
22407 02/17/95
22408 02/17/95
22409 02117/95
VENDOR
NUMBER
001757
0018~3
001819
VENDOR
NAHE
WILSON, RONALD P & VALID
WINCHESTER, NANCY G
YOUNG~ NANCY A
CITY OF TEMEOULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERZOOS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
ACCOUNT
NI. B4BER
001-2030
001-2030
001-2030
ITEM
AMOUNT
200.77
200,70
200.?0
PAGE
CHECK
ANOUNT
Z00,77
200,70
200.70
TOTAL CHECKS
429,6.t4.74
VOUCHRE2
02116/95
12:36
CITY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
100 GAS TAX FUND
190 COIIiUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
19] TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
210 CAPITAL IHPROVEHENT PROJ FUND
280 REDEVELOPtRENT AGENCY - CIP
300 INSURANCE FUND
320 [NFORNATION SYSTEHS
TOTAL
Ale3UNT
18~,457.15
3,~50.00
26,783.57
758.~5
2,888.03
17,381.26
41,788.10
6,3Z~4.38
3,536.97
4,563.30
2~2,451.71
02/, J
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUNBER
2?2.56
22256
22256
22256
22256
22256
22256
22257
22257
22257
22257
22258
22259
22260
22261
2226~
22263
22263
22263
2226~
2226~
22263
22263
2226]
22264
22265
22266
22267
22267
22267
22268
22269
22269
:
12:36
CHECK
DATE
02/28/95
02/28/95
02/28/95
02/28/95
02/28/95
02/28/95
02/28/95
02/28/95
02/28/95
02/28/95
02/28/95
02/28/95
02/28/95
02/28/95
02/28/95
02/28/95
02/28/95
02/28/95
02/28/95
02/28/95
02/28/95
02/28/95
02/28/95
02/28/95
02/28/95
02/28/95
02/28/95
02/28/95
02/28/95
02/28/95
02/28/95
02/28/95
02/28/95
02/28/95
02/28/95
02/28/95
02/28/95
VENOOR
NUMBER
000123
00012~
000123
000123
000123
000123
000123
000126
000126
000126
000126
000684
001714
001056
001056
000~81
000178
000178
000178
000178
000178
000178
000178
000178
000178
001186
000210
001658
001567
001567
001567
000231
001007
001007
001046
001046
VENDOR
N/elE
BURKE MILLIMIS & SOltENS
BURKE VILLIAHS & SO!tENS
BURKE VILLIANS& SORENS
BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENS
BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENS
BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENS
BURKE WILLIANS & SORENS
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HA
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HA
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HA
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HA
DIEHL, EVANS & COMPANY
DIX DEVELOPMENT, INC.
DREAM ENGINEERING, INC.
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
GEOTECHNICAL & ENVIRONM
GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO
GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO
GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO
GOLDEN STATE TRAOING GO
GOLDEN STATE TRADING GO
GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO
GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO
GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO
GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO
]RWIN, JOHN
LEAGUE OF CAL. CITIES -
LIENHARD CONSULTING GRO
HALEK GENERAL CORTRACTO
HALEK GENERAL CORTRACTO
HALEK GENERAL CONTRACTO
N B S/LOWRY, INC.
NPG ~P.
NPGCORP.
REXON, FREEDNAN, KLEPET
REXON, FREEDHAN, KLEPET
CITY OF TENEOULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
XTEN
DESCRIPTION
PROF. SERVICES FOR DEC 96
PROF, SERIVCES FOR DEC 96
PROF, SERIVCES FOR DEC 96
PROF. SERIVCES FOR DEC 96
PROF. SERVICES FOR DEC 96
PROF. SERVICES FOR DEC 94
INCORRECTLY TOTAL INV 21095
CRC LANDSCAPE HAINT 2/95
MEDIANS LANDSCAPE HAINT 2/95
NEIGHBORHOOD PRKS HAINT 2/95
SR CNTR LANDSCAPE HAINT 2/95
REVIEW FORM 393 BY PROF.
REFUND OF ADVANCED ENERGY FEES
DESIGN ATHLETIC FIELD LIGHTS
SLOPE HA]NT FOR FEB 95
SPTS PRK LANDSCAPE HAINT 2/95
PROF. SERVICES FOR DEC 94
HARD DRIVE (72 PIN)
FRE I GHT
TAX
2 COMPUTER COLOR HANITORS
FRE l GHT
TAX
HENOIlY CHIP (HAND DRIVE)
FRE [ GHT
TAX
PNT FOR TCSD INSTRUCTOR
95 DUES STARTING JAN
CORPUTER TRAINING OR-SITE
SERVICE FOR JAN 95 PW 96-01CS0
SERVICE FOR JAN 95 PW 94-01CSD
RETENTION W/H ON ]NVIII 005
DESIGN L]EFER RD CROSSING
PATCH WATER TRENCH t NICOLAS R
PATCH HORK i RANCNO CA RD
WAITING ON FINAL APPROVEL
PROF. SERVICES DEC9~
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-130-~-52z~
001-1280
001-130-999-52~6
300-1990
280-199-999-52~6
001-130-~-5266
001-130-999-52~6
'190-182-999-5615
191-180-999-5~15
1~0-180-999-5615
190-181-999-5415
001-130-~-5266
192-180-999-5319
210-190-161-5802
193-180-~-5415
190-180-9~9-5615
210-190-120-5802
320-19~-9~-5221
320-199-99~-5221
320-1~9-~-5221
001-170-~-5221
001-170-~-5221
001-170-~-5221
320-199-99~-5215
320-199-~-5215
320-199-999-5215
190-183-~-5330
001-100-~-5226
320-199-9~-5250
210-190-136-5804
210-1~0-17.5-580~
210-2035
210-166-627-5802
100-164-601-5402
100-166-601-5402
001-130-~-5267
001-130-~-5267
ITEM
AMOIJt/T
3,150.00
1,692.?0
19,655.9'5
3,536.97
6,5~,.38
2,129.07
2.90
1,619.00
476.97
12,471.36
175.00
5,300.00
2,888.03
6,007.50
17,381.26
6,877.81
2,598.00
600.00
5.00
66.50
z~O.O0
5.50
35.65
1,120.00
5.00
86.80
1,689.60
5,138.00
2,700.00
1,989,22
2,476.78
646.60-
1,165.00
2,650.00
1,500.00
476.35-
2,6.~.00
PAGE 1
CHECK
ANOUNT
36,311
14,760.3'5
5,300.00
2,888.03
6,007.50
24,259.07
2,598,00
2,36~.45
1 ,~8f.60
5,1::$8.00
2,700.00
4,017.60
1,165.00
3,950.00
2,157.65
VOUCHRE2
02/16/95 12:36
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR
NUMBER DATE NUMBER
22271 02/28/95 000267
22272 02/28/95 000354
22273 02/28/95 000406
2227~ 02/28/95
22274 02/28/95
22273 02/28/95 000302
22277 02/28/95 000302
22276 02/28/95 000929
22277 02/28/95
CITY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PER|OOS
RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF~S
R(X, ILANO, GEORGE &BEVER
RCY~LAND, GEORGE & BEVER
SYSTEM SOURCE, INC.
SYSTEM SOURCE, INC.
T B PENICK & SONS, INC.
000978 TRAUMA INTERVENTZON PRO
VENDOR Z TEM
NAME DESCR ! PT ! OR
RIVERSIDE CO. FIRE DEPT 1ST OTR 9/,/95 FIRE PROTECTION
RIVERSIDE CO. HEALTH DE ANIMAL SERVICE FOR DEC 9/,
NOV We BOOKING FEE
TCSO RATES REFUND FY 91-9~
TC$O RATES REFUND FY 91-94 L-A
HARPERS FURNITURE FOR B&S DEPT
TAX
RETENT]OR PAYABLE
2ND GTR AGENCY FEES
TOTAL CHECKS
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-171-999-5251
001-172-999-5255
001-170-999-5273
190-180-~-5377
191-180-999-5375
001-162-999-5601
001-162-999-5601
210-2035
001-171-999-5Z74
ITEM
AMOUNT
125,990.0Z,
5,707.36
9,494.40
4,150.80
28.:3.98
2,251.00
174.45
28,000 · O0
1,312.50
CHECK
AMOUNT
125,990.0/,
5,707.36
9,49/,.40
4,4:3Z,.78
-.
2,425.45
28,000. O0
1,312.50
292,651.71
ITEM 4
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEYk~
FINANCE OFFI
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
City Manager/City Council
FROM:
Genie Roberrs, Finance Officer
DATE:
February 28, 1995
SUBJECT:
Review and Approval of the 1994-95 Mid-Year Budget
PREPARED BY: Tim McDermott, Chief Accountant
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council:
1. Adopt Resolution No. 95- entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 95-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 ANNUAL
OPERATING BUDGET
2. Adopt Resolution No. 95- entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 95-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA REVISING THE SCHEDULE OF AUTHORIZED
POSITIONS
DISCUSSION: Each year the City conducts a mid-year review of its operating budget.
The purpose of this review is to conduct an analysis of revenues and expenditures to ensure
that the City maintains a prudent and healthy fiscal position. The Finance Department staff
has performed an analysis of revenues. Additionally, all City departments have reviewed their
operating budgets and have submitted year-end expenditure projections. The mid-year review
includes the General Fund, Gas Tax Fund, Internal Service Funds, and certain Special Revenue
Funds.
Activity in each of the funds is presented in accordance with the following schedules:
Schedule A - Fund Summary: Illustrates activity in terms of the current budget, year-
to-date activity as of December 31, 1994, and the recommended mid-year amended
budget. Schedule A presents the beginning fund balance, revenues, expenditures and
operating transfers, and the projected ending fund balance based upon this activity.
Schedule B - Revenue Detail: Illustrates revenue detail by source in terms of the
current projections, year-to-date activity as of December 31, 1994, and the mid-year
revised projections.
Schedule C - Expenditure Summary: Illustrates summaries of expenditures by each
department within the fund in terms of the current budget, year-to-date activity as of
December 31, 1994, and the mid-year revised projections.
GENERAL FUND
Based upon the recommended mid-year adjustments, the General Fund fund balance at June
30, 1995 is projected to be $12,717,579 (see attached Schedule A). Projected revenues
exceed projected expenditures and operating transfers out by $426,762for the 1994-95fiscal
year. Although the revenue projections have been revised upward by ~1,392,136, the
combination of proposed increased appropriations and previously approved adjustments to the
originally adopted budget impact the projected increase in fund balance. Significant previously
approved adjustments include the Parkview Site improvements (~267,000per the CIP budget),
and the Interim Fire Station ($256,400).
The projected General Fund revenues reflect e $1,392, 136 increase over the original budget
estimate (see attached Schedule B). Significant projected revenue adjustments are as follows:
Development Services - Increase in Building and Engineering revenues of $230,000and
$150,240 respectively. These increases are due to an improvement in general
economic conditions along with consistent housing sales and increased commercial
activity in the city.
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Reimbursements - $600,000 in
additional estimated revenue is reflected for FEMA reimbursements approved during the
year relating to the 1993 Murrieta Creek flooding.
Investment Interest - An increase of $342,000 is projected in investment interest
revenue. The rate of return on the City's cash and investments has been higher than
projected. In addition, cash and investment balances are larger than originally
anticipated.
Mid-year proposed appropriations reflect a net increase in expenditures and operating transfers
out of $458,384 (see attached Schedule C). Significant appropriation adjustments are as
follows:
Personnel Costs - Overall personnel cost savings of $101,382 have been identified.
This decrease in personnel costs is attributable to salary savings from vacant positions,
over-projected unemployment taxes, and the allocation .5 full time equivalent positions
in the Planning Department to the Redevelopment Agency.
City Council - A 84,500 increase is requested for the taping of council meetings.
City Manager - A $24,764increase is requested for costs incurred in accordance with
the provisions of the City Manager's contract.
City Attorney- A $6,000 increase is requested for unanticipated costs relating to
personnel issues.
Building & Safety - A $39,800 increase is requested for contract building inspection
and code enforcement due to the continued high demand for services.
Disaster Relief - A $200,000 appropriation is requested for drainage and street repair
costs incurred as a result of the recent heavy rains in early 1995. It is anticipated that
a substantial portion of these costs will be eligible for federal and state reimbursement.
Non-Departmental - A $130,000increase is required for the projected cost of the CFD
88-12 sales tax reimbursement.
Operating Transfer to Gas Tax Fund - The General Fund operating transfer out to the
Gas Tax Fund reflects a decrease of $225,176, primarily due to a remaining balance
of Local Transportation Funds which have been used to support Public Works activities.
Operating Transfer to Insurance Fund - An operating transfer of $361,994is requested
to eliminate the projected accumulated operating deficit in the Insurance Fund. This
deficit resulted from insurance-related costs not being fully charged to City
departments over the past four years and greater claims activity than anticipated.
GAS TAX FUND
The projected Gas Tax Fund revenues and operating transfers in reflect an increase of
$21,1 47 over the original budget estimate (see Schedule B). This increase is primarily due to
increased investment interest.
Mid-year proposed appropriations reflect a net increase of $10,853 (see Schedule C). A
$12,500 appropriation increase is requested for a Southwest Area Planning District traffic
study. This additional appropriation is partially offset by anticipated personnel cost savings.
INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS
Projected minor revenue increases are reflected for each Internal Service Fund, primarily in
investment interest (see Schedule B). A one-time operating transfer from the General Fund
is also reflected in the Insurance Fund as discussed above.
3
Mid-year proposed appropriations reflect a net increase of $36,258 for all Internal Service
Funds (see Schedule C), Significant appropriation adjustments are as follows:
Claims {Insurance Fund) - An increase of $50,000 is requested for anticipated litigation
costs.
Liability Insurance (Insurance Fund) - A decrease of $19,000 is reflected in liability
insurance costs,
Radio System Charges (Information Systems Fund) - An increase of $5,000 is
requested for the Emergency Operations Center (EOC) base station at the Community
Recreation Center.
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
Projected revenues have been increased in several Special Revenue Funds (see Schedules B).
Significant revenue adjustments are as follows:
Investment Interest - Projected revenues have been increased in the Development
Impact Fund, AB 2766 Fund, and Measure A Fund to include estimates for investment
interest,
Development Impact Fees - Projected revenues have been increased by $376,518 to
adjust the estimates for fire and signal mitigation fees and to include estimates for
public service and library fees.
AUTHORIZED POSITIONS
Exhibit I illustrates the City-wide allocation of personnel. The total number of authorized
positions remains unchanged. Currently there are 98.0 authorized positions.
It is proposed that an additional 30% of a Senior Planner's and 20% of an Associate Planner's
salary costs be charged to the Redevelopment Agency. This change is recommended because
of the adoption of the AB 1290 Implementation Plan.
Staff has determined that the needs of the Finance Department could best be met by reducing
the classification of two currently vacant positions prior to the positions being filled. It is
proposed that the Financial Services Administrator position be eliminated, and be replaced with
a Senior Management Analyst position. In addition, it is proposed that the Senior Accountant
position be eliminated, and be replaced with an Accountant position. These organizational
changes will result in salary savings to the City, and will meet the needs of the current Finance
Department structure.
4
FISCAL IMPACT: The mid-year adjusted budget projects a General Fund ending fund
balance of $12,717,579 at June 30, 1995. This represents an increase of $326,762 in the
fund balance during the 1994-95 fiscal year.
Attachments: Resolution
General Fund Schedules A through C
Gas Tax Fund Schedules A through C
Internal Services Funds Schedules A through C
Special Revenue Funds Schedules A and B
Exhibit I - Personnel Allocation By Department (City-wide)
Exhibit II - Schedule of Authorized Positions
5
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 1994-95
ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET
WHEREAS, each year a mid-year review is conducted of City operating budgets.
WHEREAS, the purpose of this review is to conduct an analysis of revenues and
expenditures to ensure that the City maintains a prudent and healthy fiscal position.
WHEREAS, the mid-year review has been completed and the recommended adjustments
are reflected in Schedules A through C of the City's General Fund; Gas Tax Fund; Internal
Service Funds; and Special Revenue Funds.
hereby
hereby
The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby resolve as follows:
Section 1. That the Fiscal Year 1994-95 General Fund Annual Operating Budget is
amended in accordance with Schedules A through C.
Section 2. That the Fiscal Year 1994-95 Gas Tax Fund Annual Operating Budget is
amended in accordance with Schedules A through C.
Section 3. That the Fiscal Year 1994-95 Internal Service Funds Budgets are hereby
amended in accordance with Schedules A through C.
Section 4. That the Fiscal Year 1994-95 Special Revenue Funds Budgets are hereby
amended in accordance with Schedules A through C.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOFrED this 281h day of February, 1995.
A'ITF, ST:
Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City
Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 28th day of February,
1995, by the following vote of the City Council:
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
SCHEDULE A
Revenue
Expenditures
Excess of Revenues Over Expenditures
Operating Transfers Out
Increase (decrease) in Fund Balance
Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 1894
Residual Equity Transfers
Est. Fund Balance, June 30, 1995
$
$
GENERAL FUND
001 FUND SUMMARY
FY 94-95
AMENDED
BUDGET
12,483,183 $
11,170,824
1,312,359
(1,81 9,349)
(506,990) $
12,390,817
(100,000)
11,783,827
FY 94-95
Y'rD@
12/31/94
6,546,035
3,988,819
2,557,21 6
(41 0,027)
2.147,189
FY 94-95
YEAR-END
PROJECTION
13,875:31 g
11,492,390
2,382,r2e
(1,956, 1
426.762
12,390,817
(100,000)
12,717,578
1~Feb-95
ACCT
NO
4119
4285
OO1 GENERAL FUND
DEPT 151 PLANNING
-Plot Plan
DEPT 162 BUILDING
-Building Permit
DEPT 163 ENGINEERING
4284 -Plan Check
4368 4mprove. lnspect. iOnsite
DEFT 166 (tip
4625 -GrBnts
DEPT 170 POUCE
4685 -Parking Cltadione
4060 -Mbc. Non Tile
4067 -Vehicle Impound Fees
4125 -Tempormy Outdoor Event
DEPT 171 FIRE
4010 .stna~ur81 Fire Tax
4686 -Fire Plan Check
4637 -Fire Inspection
DEPT 199 NON-DEPARTMENTAL
-Property Tax (Secured)
-Property Tax (Secured Prior Year)
~ -Property Tax (Usecured)
4013 -BupplementeJ Tax Prior Year
4014 -Supplemental Tax
4016 -Property Transfer Tax
4018 -Franchise Fees
4620 -Transient Occupancy Tax
4624 -Sales end Us Tax
4026 -Cigarette Tax
4028 -Homeowner Property Tax Relief
4032 -Candidate Fling Fees
4045 -Off Road Ve~icle In Lieu
4048 -Motor Vehicle in Lieu
4047 -Vehicle Code Fines
4048 -AB 2768
4050 -Pay Telephone Revenue
4051 -Contdbutimls
4053 -Bids & Pr~
4058 -Busbess LieN!sea
4057 -Promotbnel Materials
4058 -MieQelleneous
4060 -Miscellaneous Non Taxable
4051 -Returned Check Fee
4062 -RecmreW ~f Prior Yea Expense
4065 4nvatment Interest
4066 -Loan Inteest
4070 ~ Over & Shod
4075 -Rental In¢ome
4078 -Reimbursements
"'~. -Community Services District
-Redevelq~ment Agency
~_ ~., -Capital h,,prove.,,L~t Program
TOTAL GENERAL FUND
FY 94-65
BUDGET
PROJECTION
170,000
1.150,000
149,880
149,680
16.300
0
16,000
0
0
28,000
48,024
1,000,631
0
40,000
0
0
150,000
740,000
480,000
5,900,000
0
0
0
0
1,113,762
66,515
0
0
0
5,000
85,750
0
0
0
0
1
233,000
4,800
0
2,000
0
162,000
75.000
456,574
12,463.163
GENERAL FUND
REVENUE DETAIL
BY FUND SOURCE
FY 94-65
YTD~)
12/31/94
118,700
735,486
188,996
168,996
8,860
3,342
10,708
324
0
23,866
16.018
317,516
0
59,360
0
0
68,815
250,741
154,658
3,276,381
0
4,533
150
388
595,208
32.542
0
124
0
4,118
32,780
200
0
12,233
210
12,711
304,273
3,375
685
0
81 o000
37,503
0
6.546,625
FY 34-65
YEAR-END
PROJECTION
18O,000
225,OOO
225,000
16,300
3,342
19,680
400
31,200
28,624
1,680,63 1
0
6O,OOO
0
0
150,000
740,000
480,000
5.900.000
0
0
150
400
1,113,763
66,515
0
300
0
6,000
100,000
200
0
210
222,598
575,000
4,800
0
2,000
0
162,000
75,000
401.740
13,875.319
VARIANCE
INCREASE/
(DECREASE)
23o, ooo ..
75,120
75,120
0
8,342
3,68O
4OO
0
5,200
(20,0O0)
0
0
20,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
150
4O0
0
0
0
3O0
0
1,000
14,250
0
210
342,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
;4,534)
15-Feb.65
SCHEDULE C
PAGE 1
001 GENERAL FUND
CITY COUNCIL-DEPT 100
-Personnel Services
-Operating Expenditures
-Operating Expenditures
-Capital Expenditures
Total Department 100
.:ITY MANAGER-DEPT 110
-Personnel Services
-Operating Expenditures
-Operating Expenditures
-Capital Expenditures
Total Department 110
CITY CLERK-DEPT 120
-Personnel Services
-Operating Expenditures
-Operating Expenditures
-Capital Expenditures
Total Department 120
CITY AI'rORNEY-DEPT 130
-Personnel Services
-Operating Expenditures
-Operating Expenditures
-Capital Expenditures
Total Department 130
=INANCE-DEPT 140
-Personnel Services
-Operating Expenditures
-OperaUng Expenditures
-Capital Expenditures
Total Department 140
PERSONNEL-DEFT 150
-Personnel Services
-Operating Expenditures
-Operating Expenditures
-Capital Expenditures
Total Department 150
FY 94-95
ADJUSTED
APPROPRIATION
60,221
179,100
94,154
0
303,475 I
341,378
61,550
60,350
5,000
468,278
253,967
44,375
109,362
0
0
282,000
0
0
282,000 I
543,015
115,303
135,100
2,650
796,070
149,523
36,790
40,682
0
226,995
GENERAL FUND
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY
BY DEPARTMENT
FY 94-95
MID-YEAR
AMENDED BUDGET
32,254
114,653
16,038
0
60,376
165,600
54,154
0
310,130
165,554
25.598
15.087
0
227,249 I
366,142
61,550
60,350
5,000
493,042
117,391
31,523
27,340
0
176,254
246,870
48,810
109,362
0
0
127,685
0
0
127,665
0
288,000
0
0
288,000
228,925
66,395
33,774
2,623
331,717
510,158
129,525
135,100
2,650
70,212
15,657
10,171
0
149,770
38,990
40,682
0
229,442
VARIANCE
INCREASE
(DECREASE)
135
6,503
0
0
6,655
24,754
0
0
0
24.754 I
4,435
0
0
(2.662)
0
6,000
0
0
(32.657)
14,220
0
0
(18,337)
247
2~03
0
0
2,447
o~.
3.6%
0.6%
0.6%
7.3%
0.6%
0.6%
0.6%
5.3.w'
-2.8%
10o6%
-0.7~.
0.6%
2.1%
0.6%
0.6%
2.1%
-6.1.N
12.3%
0.6%
0.0%
-2.3%
1.1%
15-Feb-95
SCHEDULE C
F"""'2
001 GENERAL FUND
}LANNING-DEPT 161
-Personnel Services
-Operating Expenditures
-Operating Expenditures
.capital Expenditures
Total Department 161
9UILDING-DEPT 162
-Personnel Services
-Operating Expenditures
-Operating ExpendiNres
-Capital Expenditures
Total Department 162
.=NGINEERING-DEPT 163
-Personnel Services
~P--~ating Expenditures
tng Expenditures
::Y,,~jdal Expenditures
Total Department 163
=.W. PROJECTSrDEPT 165
-Personnel Services
-Operating Expenditures
-Operating Expenditures
-Capital Expenditures
Total Department 165
DISASTER REUEF-DEPT 166
-Personnel Servioes
-Operating Expenditures
-Opamting Expenditures
-Capital Expenditures
Total Deparlment 166
=OUCE-DEPT 170
-Personnel Services
-Operating Expenditures
-r"'~ting Expenditures
A Expenditures
Total Department 170
ADJUSTED
APPROPRIATION
GENERAL FUND
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY
BY DEPARTMENT
YTO@
12/31/94
FY C
MID-YEAR
AMENDED BUDGET
658,779
111,754
167,644
5,530
262,629
61,873
41,911
4,154
613,242
140,847
167,644
5,530
516,374
255,093
137,372
2,425
911,264 I
243.764
139,052
34,343
2,425
419,534
528,792
137J72
2A~
964,083
3~,064
50,6~
95,371
176,267
13,326
23.844
657
214,094
378,718
50,607
955,371
7000
525,396
436,574
13J99
75,082
0
525,055 I
171,045
3,662
18,770
0
1923,507
401,740
13~99
75,082
0
490,221
0
200,000
0
0
0
4,398,728
0
20,860
4,419,588
0
1,559,951
0
17,977
1,577,928
0
4,398,728
0
20,860
4.419,588
VARIANCE
INCREASE
(DECREASE)
(45,537)
29,093
0
0
(16,444)
12,419
40,400
0
0
52,819
(15,346)
0
0
0
(18,346)
0
0
0
(34,834)
0
200.000
0
0
200,000
0
26.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.4%
15.5
0.0%
0.0%
5.8%
-4.6%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
-3.4.~'
-8.0~.
0.0%
O.0%
0.0%
-6.6~/
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
NIA
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1S-Feb-95
SCHEDULE C
PAGE 3
001GENERALFUND
FIRE-DEPT 171
-Personnel Services
-Operating Expenditures
-Operating Expenditures
-Capital Expenditures
Total Department 171
ANIMAL CONTROL-DEPT 172
-Personnel Services
-Operating Expenditures
-Operating Expenditures
-Capital Expenditures
Total Department 172
NON-DEPARTMENTAL-DEPT 199
-Personnel Services
-Operating Expenditures
-Operating Expenditures
-Capital Expenditures
Total Department 199
TOTAL
GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES
OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT
-Public Works
-CIP
-Insurance
TOTAL GENERALFUND
FY 94-95
ADJUSTED
APPROPRIATION
0
775,61 6
0
85,184
0
95,000
0
0
25,771
340,0(X)
0
21,375
387,146
11,170,824
1,552,349
267,000
0
12,990,173
GENERAL FUND
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY
BY DEPARTMENT
FY 94-95
12/31/94
FY g4-95
MID-YEAR
AMENDED BUDGET
0
3,371
0
13,783
17,154
0
775,61 6
0
85,154
0
30,921
0
0
30,921
0
85,000
0
0
85,000
11,857
32
0
1,375
13,254
25,475
470, 100
0
21,375
516,950
3,958,819
11,492,3g0
388,087
21,940
0
4,395,846
1,327,173
267,000
361 ,gg4
13,448,557
VARIANCE
INCREASE
(DECREASE)
0
0
0
0
0
(10,000)
0
0
(10,000) I
(296)
130,100
0
0
129,804
321,566
(225,176)
0
361,994
458,384
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0~.
-10.5%
0.0%
0.0%
-10.5%
O.u~
0.0%
33.5%
-14.5%
0.0%
NIA
15-Feb-95
SCHEDULE A
Expenditures
Excess of Revenues Over Expenditures
Transfer from General Fund
Transfer from Local Trans. Fund
Increase (decrease) in Fund Balance
Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 1994
Est. Fund Balance, June 30, 1995
GAS TAX FUND
100 FUND SUMMARY
FY 94-95
AMENDED
BUDGET
605,161 $
2,167,804
(1,562,643)
1,552,349
0
(10,294) $
0
(10,294)
FY 94-95
YTD@
12/31/94
352,000 $
1,144,335
(792,335)
0
21 2,667
FY 94-95
YEAR-END
PROJECTION
2,178:657
(1,556,001)
1,327,173
228,828
0
0
0
15-Feb-95
SCHEDULE B
ACCT
NO
4076
100 GAS TAX FUND
'DEPT' 164 PUBUC WORKS
-Reimbursements
DEPT 199 NON-DEPARTMENTAL
4062 -Recovery ~f Prior Year Expense
4065 4nvestment Interest
40e0 -Operating Transfers In (G.F.)
40gO -Operating Transfers In {LTF)
4700 .Gas Tax 2106
4701 -Gas Tax 2105
4702 -Gas Tax 2107
4764 -Gas Tax 2107.5
ITOTAL GAS TAX FUND
GAS TAX FUND
REVENUE DETNL
BY FUND SOURCE
FY 94-05
BUDGET
PROJECTION
0
4,500
1,552,349
0
139,268
191,133
264,260
6,000
2,157,510
FY e4-e5
12/31/94
746
4,449
11,652
1,005,003
0
75,018
106,747
147,388
6,000
1,357,002 I
FY 94.~5
YEAR-END
PROJECTION
746
4,449
16,800
1,327,173
228,828
139,268
191,133
264,260
6,000
2,178,857
VARIANCE
INCREASE/
(DECREASE');'
746
4,440
12,305
(225,176)
228,828
0
0
0
0
21.147
15-Febe5
SCHEDULE C
100 GAS TAX FUND
PUBLIC WORKS-DEPT 164
-Personnel Services
-Operating Expenditures
-Operating Expenditures
-Maintenance Expenditures
-Capital Expenditures
TOTAL GAS TAX FUND
FY 94-95
ADJUSTED
APPROPRIATION
669,297
214,075
139,951
1,127,581
16,900
2,167,804
GAS TAX FUND
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY
BY DEPARTMENT
FY 94-95
12/31/94
FY 94-95
MID-YEAR
AMENDED BUDGET
299,921
99,779
34,889
693,037
16,709
226,575
139,951
1,127.581
16,900
1,144,335
2, 178,657
VARIANCE
INCREASE
(DECREASE)
12,503
0
0
0
10,853
-0.2~'.-.
5.8.N-'
0.0%
0.0~..
0.0~.
0.5.~.
SCHEDULE A
Revenue
Expenditures
Excess of Revenues Over Expenditures
Transfers from (to) Other Funds
Increase (decrease) in Retained Earnings
Beginning Retained Earnings, July 1, 1994
Est. Retained Earnings, June 30, 1995
INSURANCE INTERNAL SERVICE FUND
300 FUND SUMMARY ~',
FY 94-95 FY 94-95 FY 94-95
AMENDED YTD @ YEAR-END
BUDGET 12/31/94 PROJECTION
256,828 $ 137,21 0 $ 265.625
350,828 170,057 377,045
(94,000) (32,947) (111,420)
0 0 0
(94,0OO) $ (32,947) (111,420)
(250,574) (250.574)
(344,574) (3.61,994).
SCHEDULE A
RovoFIi.~
Expenditures
Excess of Revenues Over Expenditures
Transfers from (to) Older Funds
ncrease (decrease) in Retained Earnings
:retained Earnings, July 1, 1994
-'_~. Retained Earnings, July 1, 1995
VEHICLES INTERNAL SERVICE FUND
310 FUND 8UMMARY
FY 94-95 FY 94-95
AMENDED YTD @
BUDGET 12/31
$ 84,300 $ 43,850
82,800 19,753
1,500 24,097
0 0
1,500 $ 24,097
42,3~4
$ 43,894
FY 94-95
YEAR-END
PROJECTION
87,250
4,450
4,450
42,394
46,844
SCHEDULE A
Revenue
Expenditures
Excess of Revenues Over Expenditures
Transfers from (to) Other Funds
Increase (decrease) in Retained Earnings
Retained Earnings, July 1, 1994
Est. Retained Earnings, JuDy 1, 1995
INFORMATION SYSTEMS INTERNAL SERVICE FUND
320 FUND SUMMARY
FY 94-95 FY 94-95
AMENDED YI'D @
BUDGET 12/31/94
$ 364,872 $ 164,61 9 $
370,640 140, 127
(5,768) 44,492
0 0
(5,768) $ 44,492
62,630
$ 56,862
FY 94-95
YEAR-END
PROJECTION
367,637
379,068
(11,431 )
(11,431 )
51 ,lgg
SCHEDULE A
Revenue
Expenditures
Excess of Revenues Over Expenditures
Transfers from (to) Offier Funds
Increase (decrease) in Retained Earnings
Retained Earnings, July 1, 1994
iEst. Retained Earnings, July 1, 1995
SUPPORT SERVICES INTERNAL SERVICE FUND
330 FUND SUMMARY
$
$
FY 94-95
AMENDED
BUDGET
150,057 $
149,557
500
0
500 $
62,203
62,703
FY 94-95
m@
12/31/94
77,394
95,257
(17,8S3)
0
(17,86a)
FY 94-95
YEAR-END
PROJECTION
153,053
151:170
15-Feb-95
SCHEDULE A
Revenue
Expenditures
Excess of Revenues Over Expenditures
Transfers from (to) Other Funds
Increase (decrease) in Retained Earnings
Retained Earnings, July 1, 1994
Est. Retained Earnings, July 1, 1995
FACILITIES INTERNAL SERVICE FUND
340 FUND SUMMARY
FY 94-95 FY 94-95
AMENDED YTI:) @
BUDGET 12/31/94
$ 344,861
345,414
(553)
0
(553) $
17,370
$ 16,817
172,566
144,280
28,286
0
28,286
FY 94-95
YEAR-END
PROJECTION
345,111
345~414
17,370
17,067
15-Feb-95
ACCT
NO
INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS
FUND 300 INSURANCE
DEFT 199 NON-DEPARTMENTAL
4062 -Recovery of Prior Year Expense
4065 4nveBtment Interest
4076 .chmges For Sewices
4095 -Claims Recovery
Subtotal
Transfer from Gonered Fund
ITOTAL FUND 300
FUND 310 VEHICLES
DEFT 199 NON-DEPARTMENTAL
4065 4nveltment Interest
4076 -Charge For Servk:es
TOTAL FUND 310
FUND 320 INFO SYSTEMS
DEFT 109 NON-DEPARTMENTAL
-Recovery of Prior Year Expense
4,,,~&&b,~e~4 Interest
-Charges For Services
TOTAL FUND 320
FUND 330 SUPPORT SERVICES
DEFT 199 NON-DEPARTMENTAL
4062 -Recovery of Prior Year Expense
4065 -Investmerit Inteest
4076 -Charges For Sentlofts
.... I_TOT~N-_F~DS30_ .......
FUND 340 FACIUTIES
DEFT 199 NON-DEPARTMENTAL
4065 4nvestment Interest
4076 -Charges For Services
TOTAL FUND 340
TOTAL ALL INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS
INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS
REVENUE DETNL
BY FUND SOURCE
FY 94.05
BUDGET
PROJECTION
FY 94-05
YI'DG~
12/31/94
FY 94-05
YEAR-END
PROJECTION
VAPJANCE
INCREASE/
(DECREASE)
0 34 94 . 94
8,000 8.8 ,2."' "'
250,828 125,414 250,828 0
0 2,467 2,467 2.487
256,828 137,210
8,797
0 0 0 0
2,,8281 137,2~ol
265,625 I
8,797
1,500 2,450 4,450 2,050
62,800 41,400 82,800 0
84,300 43,850 87,250 2.950
0 265 265 265
0 1,918 2,500 2,500
364,872 182,436 364,872 0
364,872 164,61 g 367,637 2,765 ,
0 496 488 498
500 2,120 3,000 2,500
149,557 74,778 149,557 0
. I 150,057 77,394 153,053
250
' 344,861
345,111
1,21 8,678
o 136
344,861 172,430
344,861 172,566
1,200,91 8 615,340
2,Dee.
15.Feb.e5
SCHEDULE C
INTERNAL SERVICEFUNDS
INSURANCE-DEPT 199
-Personnel Services
-Operating Expenditures
-Capital Expenditures
TOTAL INSURANCE ISF
VEHICLES-DEPT 199
-Personnel Services
-Operating Expenditures
-Capital Expenditures
VEHICLES ISF
INFO SYSTEMS-DEPT 199
-Personnel Services
-Operating Expenditures
-Capital Expenditures
TOTAL INFO SYSTEMS ISF
SUPPORT SERVICES-DEPT 199
-Personnel Services
-Operating Expenditures
-Capital Expenditures
TOTAL8UPPORTSERVICESISF
FACILITIES-DEPT 199
-Personnel Services
-Operating Expenditures
-Capital Expenditures
TOTAL FACILITIES ISF
TOTAL ALL ISF
INTERNAL SERVICEFUNDS
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY
BY DEPARTMENT
FY 94-95 FY 94-95
ADJUSTED YTD {~
APPROPRIATION 12/31194
26,328
324,500
0
350,828
0
82,800
0
82,800
62,432
308,208
0
370,640
31,407
118,150
0
149,557
80,116
265,298
0
345,414
1,299,239
FY 94-95
MID-YEAR
AMENDED BUDGET
12,714
157,343
0
170,057
25,345
351,200
0
377,045
0
19,753
0
0
82,800
0
19,753
29,150
110,947
0
61,250
317,808
0
379,068
140,127
14,467
80,791
0
30,020
121,150
0
151,170
37,304
108,976
0
80,264
265, 150
0
144,280
345,414
1,335,497
VARIANCE
INCREASE
(DECREASE)
(4s3)
26,7O0
0
26,217
0
0
0
0
(1,172)
9,6O0
0
8,428
(1,387)
3,000
0
1,613
148
(148)
0
36,258
-1.8%
8.2%
0.0%
7.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
-1
3.1%
-4.4%
2.5.~
0.0%
1.1%
..0.1%
0.0%
15-Feb-95
8CHEDULEA
Revenue
Expenditures
Excess of Revenues Over Expenditures
Operating Transfers (Out)
Increase (decrease) in Fund Balance
Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 1994
Est. Fund Balance, June 30, 1 ~
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
140 FUND ,SLIMMARY
FY 94-95
AMENDED
BUDGET
219,521 $
10,000
209,521
(209,521)
0 $
(19,413)
(19._413~
FY 94-95
o
(78)
0
FY 94-95
YEAR-END
PROJECTION
219,.521
10,000
209,521
(209,521)
-- 0
(19,413)
(19,413)
15-Feb.-95
SCHEDULE A
Rivehue
Expenditures
Excess of Revenues Over Expenditures
Transfers from (to) Other Funds
Increase (decrease) in Fund Balance
Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 1 ~4
'Est. Fund Balance, June 30, 1995
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FUND
120 FUND SUMMARY
FY 94-95
AMENDED
BUDGET
2,562,260 $
2,562,260
(8,206,478)
(5,644,218) $
9,215.903
3,571,685
YTD@
12/31/94
1,661,006 $
(S43,S55)
1,117,151
FY 94-95
YEAR-END
PROJECTION
3,~8,R8
3,338,778
(8,206,478)
(4,867,700)
9,215,903
4.348,203
15-Feb-g5
SCHEDULE A
Bevenue
Expenditures
Excess of Revenues Over Expenditures
Transfers from (to) Other Funds
Increase (decrease) in Fund Balance
Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 1994
Est. Fund Balance, June 30, 1995
AB 2766 FUND
150 FUND SUMMARY
FY94-95
AMENDED
BUDGET
o $
87,713
87,713
FY g4-95
YI'D@
12/31/94
12,903 $
12,g03
0
12,g03
FY 94-g5
YEAR-END
PROJECTION
40,0(X)
40,000
0
.40,000
87,713
127,713
SCHEDULE A ~
ROVeRUe
Expenditures
Excess of Revenues Over Expenditures
Transfers from (to) Other Funds
Increase (decrease) in Fund Balance
Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 1994
Est, Fund Balance, June 30, 1995
MEASURE A FUND
170 FUND SUMMARY
FY94-95
AMENDED
BUDGET
662,097 $
1,495,1 92
2, 157,289
FY 94-95
Y'TD@
12/31/94
308,241 $
308,241
FY 94-95
YEAR-END
PROJECTION
722,097
1,495, 192
2,217,289
1 S-Feb-95
SCHEDULE A
Revenue
Expenditures
Excess of Revenues Over Expenditures
Transfers from (to) Other Funds
Increase (decrease) in Fund Balance
Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 1994
Est. Fund Balance, June 30, 1995
LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUND
180 FUND SUMMARY
FY 94-95 FY 94-95 FY 94-95
AMENDED YTD (~ YEAR-END
BUDGET 12/31/94 PROJECTION
27,680
(27,680)
0 $
228,828
228,828
0
(22e,e2e)
(228,e2.s)
27,68O
(256,5O8)
(228,828)
228,828
0
1~Feb-95
~CHEDULE B
ACCT
NO
4801
140
CDBG
-Community Development Block Grant
TOTAL CDBG
COMMUNrrY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
REVENUE DETAIL
BY FUND SOURCE
FY 94-85 FY 94-85 FY 94-85 VARIANCE
BUDGET YTD ~ YEAR-END INCREASE/
PROJECTION 12/31/34 PROJECTION (DECREASE)
219,521
219,521
219,521
219,521
15-Feb-85
8CHE~ B
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FUND
REVENUE DETAIL
BY FUND SOURCE
ACCT
NO 120 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FUND
DEPT 199 NON-DEPARTMENTAL
4085 4nvestment Interest
4221 -Public FecBitics
4223 -Pl~ks/Hlbltlt
4224 -Public Service
4230 -Pie
4235 -Signal Mitigation
4237 -Ubrey
4240 -Quimby
4241 -Ynez Traffic Mitigation
4250 -Road/Median Improvements
FY e4-e5
BUDGET
PROJECTION
0
1,840,454
296,8~1
299,282
80,744
44,88~
FY e4-e5
YTD~)
12)31/94
238,452
758,063
141,889
163,552
223,966
69,328
43,000
8,212
FY 94-e5
YEAR-END
PROJECTION
400.000
1,840.454
296,891
200,000
350,000
120,000
70,000
44.88~
VARIANCE
INCREASE/
(DECREASE)'
400.000
0
0
200,000
50,718
39,258
70,000
0
15-Peb-e5
SCHEDULE B
AB 2766 FUND
REVENUE DETAIL
BY FUND SOURCE
ACCT
NO 150 AB 2786 FUNF
]i~DEPT 199 NON-DEPARTMENTAL
4065 -Investment InteNt
TOTAL AB 2766 FUND
FY 94-e5
BUDGET
FY 9445
10,657
2.246
12,903
FYe4~5
YEAR~ND
36,000
4O,O00
VARIANCE
4,000
40,000
15-Feb-e5
SCHEDULE B
MEASURE A FUND
REVENUE DETAIL
BY FUND SOURCE
ACCT
NO 170 MEASURE A FUND
DEPT 199 NON-DEPARTMENTAL
4065 4nvestment Interest
4725 -Measure 'A'
TOTAL MEASURE A FUND
FY 94-65
BUDGET
PROJECTION
662,097
662,097
FY 94-65
12f31/94
39,851
268,390
308,241
FY 94-65
YEAR-END
PROJECTION
722,097
VARIANCE I
mlCREASE/
(DECREASe
15-Feb-65
SCHEDULE B
LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUND
REVENUE DETAIL
BY FUND SOURCE
ACCT
NO
4065
4828
180 LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUND
DEPT 199 NON-DEPARTMENTAL
-Investment Interat
-ArUcle 3 Revenues
TOTAL LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUND
FY 94-~5
BUDGET
PROJECTION
27,680
27,680
FY 94-e5
12/31/94
FY 94-85
YEAR-END
PROJECTION
27,680
27,680
VARIANCE
INCREASE/
(DECREASE)
1S-Feb45
PERSONNEL A~,LOCATION BY DEPARTMENT
(Full Time Equivalents listed)
Authorized Proposed
199495 Chan~es
Councilmemben 5.00 O.00
Department Total
Deoartment:
C1TY MANAGER
oty 2v~nager
AssisUmt City Manager
Human Resources Admlni.~rator
Executive Assistant
Personnel Specinli~
Admini-~rative Secretary
1.00 0.00 1.00
1.00 0.00 1.00
1.00 0.00 1.00
1.00 0.00 1.00
2.00 0.00 ZOO
1.00 0.00 1.00
Department Total
7.00 0.00 7.00 =
DeDartment:
oty c~rk
Deputy City Clerk
Office Speclnli~
Office Assistant
1.00 0.00 1.00
1.00 0.00 1.00
1.50 0.00 1.50
2,~ 0.00 2.00
Dcpartmcnt Total
5.50 0.00 5.50
Deoartment:
FINANCE
Finance Officer
Chief Accountant
Financial Services Admini,q:mtor
Senior Accountant
Senior lVtnnngement Analyst
Accountant
Accounting Specialist
Admini-~rative Secretary
Accounting Assistant
1.00 0.00 1.00
1.00 0.00 1.00
0.75 (0.75) 0.00
1.00 (1.~ 0.00
0.00 0.~ 0.~
0.00 1.00 1.00
3.00 0.00 3.00
0.~ 0.00 0.~
2.50 0.00 2.50
w~anm~t To~
10.00 O.oo ~
ExlUDxt J,
Page 1
Recommended
1994-95
5.oo o.oo 5.oo
ExlUbit
Page
pERSONNEL'ALLOCATION BY DF, PARTMF-NT
(Full Tune F, quival~nts listed, Continued)
Anthodzed Proposed
199495 Changes
Department: PLANNING
~ Of planning
Senior planner
AssocialB planner
Assistant planner
planning Technician
Admini.qllfive Secretary
~ Specinli~
Office Assistant
Recommended
1994-95
Department Total
1.00 0.00 1.00
1.80 (0.30) 1.50
1.60 (0.20) 1.40
2.00 0.00 2.00
2.00 0,00 2.00
1.00 0.00 1.00
1.00 0.00 1.00
1.00 0.00 1.00
Department:
~ (O.5m 10.90
BUH-DING AND SAI~TY
1.00
1.00
2.00
1'.00
1.00
2.00
1.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Q.O0
Chief Building Official
Senior Building ~n~ctor
Building InspecWr H
Code Enfowement Officer
Building Inspector I
Building Technician
Admini.~trative Secretary
Office Assistant
10.00
Department Total
ENGINEERING
0,30
0,35
0,30
0.45
1,00
1,05
0,90
0.85
0.85
0.50
0,25
1,20
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
O.O0
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Principal Engineer
Traffic ~n~ineer
Permit Engineer
Associate Engineer
Assistant ~ngi~ee.r
Senior Public Works Inspector
Public Works Inspector
Engineering Technician
Bngin~ring Aide
Admini.qa-ative Secretary
Department Total
1.00
1.00
2.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
1.00
1.00
10.00
0,30
0,35
0.30
0.45
1.00
1.05
0.90
0.85
0.85
0,50
0.25
Exhibit I
Page 3
PERSONNEL A~ J OCATION BY DEPARTMENT
(Full Time Equivalents listed, Continu~)
1994-95 Chanff, s
CIP ADh/IINISTRATION
~r of Public Works/City Engineer 0.30
Principal Engineer 1.00
Traffic Engineer 0.20
Associate Engineer 1.00
Assistant EnZin~*r 1.00
Senior Public Works Innpector 1.00
Public Works Inspector 1.00
Admini.~xative Secretary 0.25
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Department Total
Deoartment:
NON-DEPAR~AL
Senior Management Analyst
Non-Department ToUd
De~rtment:
PUBLIC WORKS
Director of Public Works/City Engineer0.40
Principal Engineer 0.65
Traffic Engineer 0.50
l%4nintelHnCe Superintendent 1.00
Permit Engineer 0.55
Senior Public Works Inspector 0.10
Assistant Engineer 0.95
Public Works Inspector 0.15
Engineering Technician 0.15
Traffic Technician 1.00
Lead lVhlnte4xance Worker 2.00
Engineering Aide 0.50
Administrative Secretary 0.50
MainWnance Worker 2.00
OffiCe AsSiStnnt 1.55
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1994-95
0.30
1.00
0.20
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.25
0.25
0.40
0.65
0.50
1.00
0.55
0.10
0.95
0.15
0.15
1.00
2.00
0.50
0.50
ZOO
1.55
~ DeVartment To~ ~2.00 O.00 12.00
ExtUbit I
Page 4
PERSONNBI, A ,LOCATION BY DEPAKTM -NT
(Full Time F. quivalcnts listed, Continued)
Authorized Proposed
1994-95 Changes
Deoartment:
COMlVRR~ SERVICES
Director of Community Services
Recreation Superintendent
Maint~nanc~ Superintendent
Sc~tior Manngcment Analyst
Landscape Inspector
Recreation Supervisor
Adminintrative SccI~ary
Recreation Coordinator
M~intcnance Worker
Volunteer Coordinator
Office Assisnnt
Recommended
1994-95
1.~ 0.~ 1.~
1.~ 0.~ 1.~
0.~ 0.~ 0.85
0.~ 0.~ 0.~
1.~ 0.~ 1.~
2.~ 0.~ 2.~
1.~ 0.~ 1.~
2.~ 0.~ 2.~
2.~ 0.~ 2.~
1.~ 0.~ 1.~
2.~ 0.~ 2.~
Department Total
Department:
Landscape Inspector
14.45 0.00 14.45
SERVICE LEVEL A
0.45
Detmrtment:
Office Assistant
SERV/CE LEVEL B
Deoartment: SERVICE LEVEL C
Management Assistant
Landscape Inspector
1.00
0.55
0.00
0.00
1.00
0.55
DeparUnent Total
1.55
1.55
COmmUlfi~y Services Total
Exhibk I
Page 5
PERSONNEl, AI J,OCATIO BY D .PARTlV[F, NT
(Full Time Equivalents listed, Continued)
1994-95 Changes
INTERNAL SERVICE
Deoartment:
INSURANCE
Financial Services Administrator
Senior Management Analyst
Admini.~rative Secretary
1994-95
Sub-total
0.25 (0.25) 0.00
0.00 0.25 0.25
0.25 0.00 0.25
0.50 0.00 0.50
Denartment: INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Information Systems Administrator 1.00
Deoartment: SUPPORT SERVICES
Administrative Technician ' i. O0
Denartment: FACH,ITIES
Maintenance Superintendent
lVhintenance Worker
CustOdinn
Sub-total
Internal Service Total
0.15
1.00
1.oo
2.15
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.15
1.00
1.00
2.15
Deoartment:
Senior Planner
Associate Planner
Redevelopmerit A~ency Total
TOTAL AUTHOlivzE~ POSITIONS
REBEV~O~ AGENCY
0,20
Q.40
0.60
pS.00
0.50
0.50
0.60
1.10
Exhibit I
Page 6
PERSONN~J- ALI ~OCATION BY DEPARTMENT
(Pull Tune Equivalents listed, Continued)
GENERAL FUND
Anthoxizl~ Proposed ,Recommended
1994-95 Cbnges 1994-95
City Council
City Mana~,er
City Clerk
Finance
planning
Buff dinE and Safety
Engineering l
CIP Administration
Non-Departmental
Public Works
5.00 0.00 5.00
7.00 0.00 '7.00
5.50 0.00 5.50
10.00 0.00 10.00
11.40 (0.50) 10.90
10.00 0.00 10.00
8.00 0.00 8.00
6.00 0.00 6.00
0.40 0.00 0.40
12.00 0.00 12.00
COMMUNITY SERVICES
Community Services
Service Level A
Service Level B
Service Level C
14.45 0.00 14.45
' 6.45 o.oo 0.45
1~00 0.00 1.00
1.55 O.OO 1.55
INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS
InsuIlnce
Information Services
Support Services
Facilities
0.50 0.OO 0.50
1.OO 0.OO 1.OO
1.OO 0.OO 1.OO
2.15 0.OO 2.15
I~EVELO~ AGENCY
planning
0.60 0.50 1.10
TOTAL AUTHO1H'zEB POSITIONS
9s.oo q.oo ~
RESOLUTION NO. 95-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA REVISING THE SCI~I}ULE OF
AUTHOI~IZED POSITIONS
WHEREAS, pursuant to the authority under Chapter 2.08.060 of the City's Municipal
Code, the City manager has the authority to hire, set salaries and adopt personnel policies; and,
WHEREAS, the City Manager has recommended and the City Council now wishes to
adopt the revised Schedule of Authorized Positions;
The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby resolve as follows:
Section 1. The attached Schedule of Authorized Positions (Exhibit II) is hereby adopted
pursuant to Section 45001 of the California Government Code. Such list is attached to this
Resolution and incorporated herein by this reference.
Section 2. The Schedule of Authorized Positions shall become effective March 1, 1995,
and may be thereafter amended.
Section 3. The City Manager shall implement the attached Schedule of Authorized
Positions and has the authority to select and appoint employees in accordance with the Cityis
personnel policies.
Section 4. All prior Resolutions in conflict with this Resolution are hereby rescinded.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 28th day of February, 1995.
ATTEST:
Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City
Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 28th day of February,
1995, by the following vote of the City Council:
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
POSITION TITLES
Accountant
Accounting Assistant
Accounting Specialist
Administrative Secretary
Administrative Technician
Assistant City Manager
Assistant Engineer
Assistant Rannar
Associate Engineer ·
Associate Planner
Building Inspector I
Building Inspector II
Building Technician
Chief Accountant
Chief Building Official
City Clerk
City Manager
Code Enforcement Officer
Councilmember
Custodian
Deputy City Clerk
Director of Community Services
Director of Ranning
Dir, of Public Works/City Engineer
Engineering Aide
Engineering Technician
Executive Assistant
Finance Officer
Human Resources Administrator
Information Systems Administrator
Landscape Inspector
Lead Maintenance Worker
Maintenance Superintendent
Maintenance Worker
Management Assistant
Office Assistant
Office Specialist
Permit Engineer
Personnel Specialist
Planning Technidan
Principal Engineer
Public Works Inspector
Recreation Coordinator
Recreation Superintendent
Recreation Supervisor
Senior Building Inspector
Senior Management Analyst
Senior Rannat
Senior Public Works Inspector
Traffic Engineer
Traffic Technician
Volunteer Coordinator
TOTAL'."
SCHEDULE OF AUTHORIZED POSITIONS
AUTHORIZED
POSITIONS MINIMUM MAXIMUM
I $2,573
2.5 $1,653
3 $1,978
6 $1,928
1 $1,435
I $5,936
3 $3,139
2 $2,539
2 $3,358
2 $3,139
I $2,305
2 $2,505
2 62,258
I $3,478
1 $5,393
1 $4,487
I $2,417
5 $ 300
1 $1,573
1 $2,487
I $5,393
1 $5,393
1 $5,936
1 $1,978
I $2,167
I - $2,487
I $5,393
I $3,478
1 $3,180
2 $2,305
2 $1,984
2 $3,526
5 $1,717
I $2,417
10 $1,435
2.5 $1,498
1 $3,358
2 $1,978
2 $2,258
2 $4,181
2 $2,505
2 $1,614
I $3,431
2 $2,080
I $3,031
2 $3,180
2 $3,526
2 $3,031
1 $4,181
I $2,167
I $1,498
$3,208
$2,062
$2,467
$2,405
$1,791
$7,404
$3,913
$3,165
$4,188
$3,913
$2,874
$3,123
62,817
64,338
$6,727
$5,595
$8,914
$3,014
$ 300
$1,962
$3 101
$6 727
$6.727
$7.404
$2.467
$2.705
$3 101
$6 727
$4,338
$3,967
$2,874
$2,474
$4,399
$2,141
$3,014
$1,791
$1,867
$4,188
$2,467
$2,817
$5,215
$3 123
$2 012
$4 279
$2 592
$3.780
$3.967
$4 399
$3 780
$5,215
$2,705
$1,867
98.0
RANGE
2006
1012
1028
1026
1000
4024
2024
2004
2032
2024
1044
2002
1042
3002
4016
4000
5000
1048
6000
1008
2000
4016
4016
4024
1028
1038
2000
4016
3002
2026
1044
1030
3000
1016
1048
1000
1004
2032
1028
1042
3014
2002
1010
3000
1034
2020
2026
3004
2020
3014
1038
1004
EXEMPT/
NONEXEMPT
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
E
NE
NE
E
NE
NE
NE
NE
E
E
E
E
NE
E
NE
E
E
E
E
NE
NE
E
E
E
E
NE
NE
E
NE
NE
NE
NE
E
NE
NE
E
NE
NE
E
NE
NE
E
E
NE
E
NE
NE
R:T,.ARCHEIL'tlS'T't, AUTHPOH.LST 2/21/96 Effmetjve Febeuer/26, 1996
ITEM 5
CII~Y~AN~M~AGO~ ~
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
City Council/City Manager
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
February 28, 1995
SUBJECT:
Release Labor and Material and Monument Bonds in Tract No. 23267-1
PREPARED BY: ;-4,-Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council AUTHORIZE the release of Labor and Material Bond for Street, Water,
and Sewer Improvements, end 'be Monument Bond in Tract No. 23267-1, and DIRECT the
City Clerk to so notify the Developer and Surety.
BACKGROUND:
On October 22, 1991, the City Council entered into subdivision agreements with:
The I~esley Companies
15010Avenue of Science, Suite 201
San Oiego, CA 92128
for the improvement of streets, bstallation of sewer and water systems, and subdivision
monumentstion in Tract No. 232b"/-1. Original bonds were posted by The American Motorists
Insurance Company.
On February 9, 1993, the City Cemcil accepted substitute bonds furnished by the American
Insurance Company as follows:
Category Subelitute Bond No. Amount
Streets 111 27 10 2791 $906,000
Water System 1112710 2791 102,500
Sewer System 11127 10 2791 111.000
Total = $1,119,500
Survey Monuments 111 4925 7167
$19,470
On August 23, 1994, the City !C. mmcil accepted the street, water and sewer improvements,
authorized reduction in Faithful P~eformance bond amounts, accepted the subdivision warranty
bond rider, end initiated the one.lear warranty period.
-1- pwO11agdrpt~5't0228%tr232671.mlm 0215
The developer is also required to post Labor and Material bonds to ensure payment to suppliers
and workers. These bonds ere maintained in effect for a period of time determined by the
Subdivision Improvement Agreement after the City Council has accepted the public
improvements. The contractual six-month claim period has run and no claims have been filed
with the City. Therefore Staff recommends that the following Labor and Material Bond posted
by the American Insurance Company be released:
Bond No. 111 2710 2791 in the amount of $560,000to cover labor and materials for
street, water and sewer improvements
The inspection and verification process relating to the survey monumentation has been
completed by the City staff, and the Department of Public Works recommends the release of
the Monument Bond. Therefore it is appropriate to exonerate this bond as follows:
Bond No. 111 1925 7167 in the amount of ~19,470to cover survey
monumentation.
The affected streets were accepted into the City maintained street system by City Council
Resolution No. 94-87. The streets within the subdivision are Corte Belle Donna, Corte
Carolina, and a portion of Redhawk Parkway, Via Cordoba, and Corte Zorita.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
Attachments:
Location Map
-2- pwO1~egdrpt~95%O228~tr232671.mlm 0215
CORTE ZORITA
TRA C T NO. 232 6 7-1
1" .R A C T NO ~ -:9 0 9 ~ - 6
M.B. 222/B4- 98
- r_,.oRTF, F_.AEOLI NA
Location
Map
ITEM 6
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
City Council/City Manager
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
February 28, 1995
SUBJECT:
Release Labor and Material and Monument Bonds in Tract No. 23267-4
PREPARED BY: ,/w~lbert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council AUTHORIZE the release of Labor and Material Bond for Street, Water
and Sewer improvements, and the Monument Bond in Tract No. 23267-4, and DIRECT the
City Clerk to so notify the Developer and Surety.
BACKGROUND:
On December 10, 1991, the City Council entered into subdivision agreements with:
The Presley Companies
15010 Avenue of Science, Suite 201
San Diego, CA 92128
for the improvement of streets, installation of sewer and water systems, and subdivision
monumentation in Tract No. 23267-4. Original bonds were posted by the American Motorists
Insurance Company.
On September 14, 1993, the City Council accepted substitute bonds furnished by The
American Insurance Company as follows:
Ceteoorv Substitute Bond No. Amount
Streets 111 2720 2809 $327,000
Water System 111 2720 2809 130,500
Sewer System 111 2720 2809 76.500
Total = $534,000
Survey Monuments 111 2716 9941
$11,650
On August 23, 1994, the City Council accepted the street, water and sewer improvements
authorized reduction in Faithful Performance bond amounts, accepted the subdivision warranty
bond rider, and initiated the one-year warranty period.
I %agdrpt%9~O228%tr232674.rrdm 0215
The developer is also required to post Labor and Material bonds to ensure payment to suppliers
and workers. These bonds are maintained in effect for a period of time determined by the
Subdivision Improvement Agreement after the City Council has accepted the public
improvements. The contractual six-month claim period has run and no claims have been filed
with the City. Therefore Staff recommends that the following Labor and Material Bond posted
by the American Insurance Company be released:
Bond No. 111 2720 2808 in the amount of $266,700 to cover labor and
materials for street, water and sewer improvements.
The inspection and verification process relating to the survey monumentation has been
completed by the City staff, and the Department of Public Works recommends the release of
the Monument Bond. Therefore it is appropriate to exonerate this bond as follows:
Bond No. 111 2716 9941 in the amount of $11,650to cover survey
monumentation.
The affected streets have been accepted into the City maintained street system by City
Council Resolution No. 94-87. The streets within the subdivision are Via Poquito, and a portion
of Avenida De Missions, Corte Veranos, and Calla Los Padres.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
Attachments:
Location Map
2 ~agdrpt%95%0228%tr232674.mlm 0215
..."I'EMECULA
Location
ITEM 7
APPROVAl,
CITY AlTOMY
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Cound/City Manager
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
February 2.8, 1995
Program Sul~lement No. 005 to the Local Agency/State Agreement for
Federal-Aid Projects for the Traffic Signal at Margarita Rd. & Avenida
Barca (PW93-10)
PREPARED BY: ~fDon Spagndo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects
Scott Harvey, Associate Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
lIESOLUTION NO. 95-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT NO. 005, TO
LOCAL AGENCY/STATE AGREEMENT NO. 08-5459, BETWEEN
THE STATE DEPAIITMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE
CITY OF TEMECI. A FOR FEDERAL AID PROJECT NO. STPLG-
5459(005), MARGNiTA ROAD AND AVENIDA BARCA
BACKGROUND:
The City applied for Federal Fun~mg to construct a four-way traffic signal at the intersection
of Margarita Road & Avenida 'Barca. The funds have been granted and allocated through
Program Supplement No. 005 to lbe Local Agency/State Agreement for Federal-Aid Project
No. 08-5459.
This program supplement is subject to all the terms and conditions established by Caltrans
which require that the local agerg/advertise, award, and administer the project subject to
Caltrans approval.
Funds for the construction of this lwoject have been allocated in the amount of $103,000and
will be administered by Caltrans, District 8,
-1 - pwO41r:~agdrpt~94%O228%pw93-10.eup
FISCAL IMPACT:
This is a Capital Improvement project and is being funded through the Federal Surface
Transportation Program (STP). STP funds have been allocated in the amount of $103,000and
will be administered by Caltrans, District 8.
Attachments:
Resolution No. 95-
Supplement Agreement No. 005
-2- pwO41r:%agdrpt%94%O228%pw93-10.sup
RESOLUTION NO. 9.5-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECUIA APPROVING PROGRAM SUP~
NO. 00~, TO LOCAL AGENCY/STATE AGREEMENT NO.
08-$4~9, BETWEEN THE STATE DEPAR~ OF
TRANSPORTATION AND THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR
F~DERAL AID PROJECT NO. STPIf~5459(005),
MARGARITA ROAD AND AVENIDA BARCA
The City Council of the City of Temecula does resolve, determine and order as follows:
WIlEREekS, before Federal-Aid will be made available for Project No. PW93-10,
Traffic Signal Instalhtion at Margarita Road and Avenida Barca, the LOCAL AGENCY and
STATE are required to enter into a Program Supplement Agreement.
WHEREAS, Program Supplement No. 005 allocates funding in the amount of $103,000
for the construction of said traffic signal project.
NOW, T!:~REFOR, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Temecula,
as follows:
Section 1.
That the City Council appwve and authorize execution of Program
Supplement Agreement No. 005 between State Depaxtrnent of
Transportation and the City of Temecuh.
Section 2. Authorize the Mayor to execute said Agreement
Section 3. The City Clerk shall codify the adoption of this resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecuh
at a regular meeting held on the 28th day of February, 1995.
ATTEST:
Jeffery E. Stone, Mayor
June S. Greek
City Clerk
-1 - pwO4/r:%egdq~fi94%O228~pw93-10.eup
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
crrY OF TI~/IECULA )
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that
Resolution No.91{- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 28th day of l~ebruary, 1995 by the following:
vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
COUNCn~MEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCIII~-MBERS:
-2- pwO4/r:~d rpt~94~O228%pw93-10 .sup
PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT NO. 005 Location= 08-RIV-0-TMC
to Project Number: STPLG-5459 (005)
LOCAL AGENCY-STATE AGREBM. F, NT E.A. Number: 08-411264
FEDERAL-AID PROJECTS NO. 08-5459
This Program Supplement is hereby incorporated into the Local Agency-State
Agreement for Federal Aid which was entered into between the Local Agency
and the State on 03/23/93 and is subject to all the terms and conditions
thereof. This Program Supplement is adopted in accordance with Paragraph 2
of Article II of the aforementioned Master Agreement under authority of
Resolution No. , approved by the Local Agency on
(See copy attached).
The Local Agency further stipulates that as a condition to payment of funds
obligated to this project, it accepts and will comply with the covenants or
remarks setforth on the following pages.
PROJECT TERMINI=
Margarita Road & Avenida Barca
TYPE OF WORK: Traffic Signal
PROJECT CLASSIFICATION OR PHASE(S) OF WORK
[ ] Preliminary Engineering [ ] Right-of-Way
[X] Construction Engineering [X] Construction
Estimated costI Federal Funds
103000 33T $ 103000
$ 0
LENGTH: 0.1 (MILES)
[ ]
Matching Funds
Local OTHER OTH~
05 05
CITY OF TEMECULA
By
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Department of Transportation
By
DISTRICT DIRECTOR OF TRANSPORTATION
DISTRICT 8
Date Date
Attest
Title
I hereby Certify upon my personat knowtedge that badgered funds are svsi tabLe for this encurbrance:
Accounting Office Date /'~7'~ff $
ChapterI stetu~es I Program Iscl Fund Source
139 1994, 2660-101-890 9/.95 20.30.010.810 C 2620~0 892-F
103000.00
103000.00
Page i of 2
08 -RIV-0-TMC
STPLG-5459 ( 005 )
SPECIAL COVENANTS OR REMARKS
DATE: 01/27/95
1. All maintenance, involving the physical condition and the
operation of the improvements, referred to in Article VI
MAINTENANCE of the aforementioned Master Agreement will be
performed by the Local Agency at regular intervals or as required
for efficient operation of the completed improvements.
2. The Local Agency will advertise, award, and administer this
project and will obtain the State~s concurrence prior to either
award or rejection of the contract.
3. The Local Agency agrees the payment of Federal funds will be
limited to the amounts approved by the Federal Highway
Administration in the Federal-Aid Project Agreement (PR-2)/Detail
Estimate, or its modification (PR-2A) or the FNM-76, and accepts
any increases in Local Agency Funds as shown on the Finance or
Bid Letter or its modification as prepared by the Division of
Local Streets and Roads.
4. In executing this Program Supplemental Agreement, Local
Agency hereby reaffirms the "Nondiscrimination Assurances"
contained in the aforementioned Master Agreement for
Federal-Aid Program.
5. Whenever the local agency uses a consultant on a cost plus basis,
the local agency is required to submit a post audit report cover-
ing the allowability of cost payments for each individual consul-
tant or sub-contractor incurring over $25,000 on the project.
The audit report must state the applicable cost principles utili-
zed by the auditor in determining allowable costs as referenced in
CFR 49, part 18, Subpart C - 22, Allowable Costs.
Page 2 of 2
ITEM 8
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Council/City Manager
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
February 28, 1995
Completion and Acceptance of the Ynez Road Landscape Improvements,
No. PW94-04
PREPARED BY: 0~/Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects
Scott Harvey, Associate Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council accept the Ynez Road Landscape Improvements, Project No. PW94-04,
as complete and direct the City Clerk to:
File the Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a one (1) year
Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract, and
Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after the filing of the Notice
of Completion if no liens have been filed.
BACKGROUND:
On May 10, 1994, the City Council awarded a contract for the Ynez Road Landscape
Improvements, Project No. PW94-O4, to Emerald Landscape Services for $188,962.00. These
landscaping improvements involved several areas in the parkway on the east side of Ynez
Road and in the new median islands. The work performed in the median island included the
installation of cobbles set in e concrete bed, root barriers, and river washed granite boulders.
Landscape plantings include roses, day lilies, mondo grass, ice plant, rosemary, crepe myrtles,
torrey pines, and scarlet oaks. The decorative Ioffel retaining wall on the east side of Ynez
Road, just north of Solane Way, was also planted with a colorful ground cover that will
eventually cover the entire wall.
On October 13, 1994 the construction of Ynez Road Landscape Improvements were
completed, which began a 90 calendar day landscape maintenance period· That maintenance
period has expired and the Contractor has completed ell items of work to the satisfaction of
the City Engineer· The construction retention for this project will be released on or about
thirty-five (35) days after the Notice of Completion has been recorded.
pwO41r. ~agd~pt~95M)228~w94-04 .a~
FISCAL IMPACT:
The contract amount for this project was ~188,962.00. Contract Change Orders No. 1
through 3 were approved for a total amount of $7,925.50. The total construction cost is
$196,887.50. This project is a Capital Improvement Project and is being funded from the
series of bonds which have been sold for Community Facilities District 88-12.
Attachment:
Notice of Completion
Maintenance Bond
Contractor's Affidavit
RECORDING REQUESTED BY
AND RETURN TO:
CITY ClERK
CITY OF TEMECULA
43174 Buekteee Peek Drive
Tememab, CA 82590
IPACE
NOTICE OF COMPLETION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT:
1. The City of Temecula is the owner of the property hereinafter described.
2. The full address of the City of Temecula is 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula,
Califomis 92590.
3. A Contract was awarded by the City of Temecula to Emerald Landscape Services to
perform the following work of improvement:
PIN94-04 Ynez Road Landscaping Improvements.
4. Said work was completed by said company according to plans and specifications and
to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works of the City of Tamecain and that said work was
accepted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on FebmaW 28,
1995. That upon said contract the EXPLORER INSURANCE COMPANY was surety for the bond given
by the said company as required by law.
5. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the City of
Temecula, County of Riverside, State of Califomis, and is described as follows: PROJECT PW 94-04.
6. The street address of said property is: YNEZ ROAD FROM RANCHO CAUFORNIA
ROAD TO WINCHESTER ROAD.
Dated at Temecula, California, this _ day of
· 1995.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )
CITY OF TEMECULA )
SS
JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California and do hereby certify under penalty of
perjury, that the foregoing NOTICE OF COMPLETION is true and correct, and that said NOTICE OF
COMPLETION was duly and regularly ordered to be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder of
Riverside by said City Council.
Dated at Temecula, California, this day of
· 1995.
JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk
Forna/CIP-O01 Roy. 12..~J~l pwO4%pw94-O4%complefn. not 021595
CM~ OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MAINTENANCE 10ND
:Bond No. 131
KNOW ALL MIN IY THEBE PRBIINTI THAT:
Eaerald ],Bodecape Sez'rLces - P.O. Box 63 ~lFaaa Juc]2, Ca 92652
N,4MI ANO ADDRE:~ OF CONTA4 CTOI/I
11 11
· T,,dt*rldual . hereirmfter called Principal, end
F,z~lozet :Loststance Compaz~ - 10140 Campus Point Dr., Sac Diego, Ca 92121
NAME,eND ,4DDIM'$~ OF $1,RETY
hereinafter called SURETY, am held and firmly bored unto CITY OF TEMECULA,
hereinatter eelled OWNER, in the penal sum of
_*s~z saw* I:)OLLARI end *sex sg, ov, 0Eirrl (l~8,896.20l in lawful money of the
United Sate, for the payment of which sum well and truly to be made, we bind ourelves,
meownora and auignl, Jointly and averally, firmly by them presents.
THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION LS such that whereee, the Prindpel entered into a certa; ~
Contract with the OWNER, dlted the 10tb day ef Nay ,11 ..94 , a copy of which k
hemto attached and made a pert hereof forthe conetalon of PROJECT NO. t4-04YIEZ ROAD
WHIRgAS, Mid Contract provide that the INncipel will furnish · bend condltioned to guarantee
for the period of aria year after approval of the final estimate on Mid job, by the OWNER, against
811 defects in workmermhip end materials which may become apparent during Mid period; end
WIllREAl, the aid Contract has been ecruplated, end we epproved on F~I~~ ~
19c~5. ·
NOW, THIRBFORI, THE CONDITION OF THIS OILIOATION 18 SUCH, that If within one year from
the date of approval of the aid Contract, the work done under the terms of aid ConTact shaft ·
disclose poor workmarmhip In the execution of aid work, and the carrying Out of the terms of Mid
Contract, Or it shall appear that deferde materials were furnished thereunder, then this obligation
shell remain tn full force and virtue, otherwia thLs instrumem tdall be void.
*EI~ THOUSAND EIGE~HBND]tED NJ_NWfZ STT&ED 20/100'
MAINTINANCI BONO Iv~l
Signed end mated this Z4t:b day of Yebr'uaz7 ,19 9.,._,.~5,
(SoliI)
8URk'TY Explorer T,~~any
Les
(Name)
ACt:orney in Yac~:
(T'~JO)
APPROVED AI TO IK)RM:
$aott F. Reid, City Attomly
:NCl~ld~ ~~,~~cape
:T,:~,.- d.. ~j-~,..~.L.-
{Name)
('rme)
(Name)
rr~o)
Services
CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
State of ca3_t,eoz~ta
County of oraz~e
On 2-1z,-95
DATE
personally appeared
[] personally known to me - OR - [] proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence
to be the person(;~ whose name(e;¢ is/mawr
subscribed to the within instrument and ac-
knowledged to me that he/Sr~e~eNf executed
the same 'in his/rfO~f~F~Uq~r authorized
capacity(ie$~ and that by
signature(x) on the instrument the person~;l),
or the entity upon behalf of which the
person(x) acted, executed the instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
OPTIONAL
Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent
fraudulent reattachment of this form,
CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER
[] INDIVIDUAL
[] CORPORATE OFFICER
DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT
Tn'LE(S)
[] PARTNER(S) [] LIMITED
[] GENERAL
[] ATTORNEY-IN-FACT
[] TRUSTEE(S)
[] GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR
[] OTHER:
TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT
NUMBER OF PAGES
DATE OF DOCUMENT
SIGNER IS REPRESENTING:
NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITY(IF.S)
Explorer Insuzance Company SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE
993 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION · 8236 Remmet Ave., P.O. Box 7184 · r,,~noga Park, CA 91309-7184
Explorer Insurance Company
HOME OFFICE: SAN DIEGO, CAUFORNIA
Certified Copy of
POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the EXPLORER INSURANCE COMPANY, I Corporation duly authorized and existing under the
laws ot the State of APIZONA and having its principal office in the City of San Diego, Calitomta, does hereby nominate, constitute end appoint:
Les Mantle
its true and lawful Attorney(s)4n-Fact, with full power and authority hereby conferred In its name, place and stead, to execute, seal, acknowledge
end deliver any and all bonds, undertakings, recognizances or other wrltlen obligations In the nature thereof.
This Power of Attorney is granted and is signed and sealed by facsimile under and by the authority of the following Resolution adopted by the
Board of Directors of the EXPLORER INSURANCE COMPANY at a meeting duly called and held on the 22rid day of JULY, 1985, which said
Resolution has not been amended or rescinded and of which the following is a true, full, and complete copy:
"RESOLVED: That the President or Secretary may from time to time appoint Attorneys-In-Fact to represent and act for and on behalf of the
Company, and either the President or Secretary, the Board of Directors or Executive Committee may at any time remove such Attorneys-in-Fact
and revoke the Power of Altomay given him or her; and be it further
RESOLVED:. That the Attorney-In-Fact may be given full power to execute for and in the name of and on behalf of the Company any and all
bonds and undertakings as the business of the Company may require, and any such bonds or underlakinga exeouted by any such Attomey4n-
Fact shall be as binding upon the Company as if signed by the President and sealed and attested by the Secretary.'
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, EXPLORER INSURANCE COMPANY has caused its official seal to be hereunto affixed and these presents to be
signed by its duly authorized officers this
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO SS:
7th day of August,
1990
EXPLORER INSURANCE COMPANY
~resident
On this 7th day of Au u 1990
g S t, before the subscriber, a Notary Publ; c of the State of California, in and for the County of San Diego,
duly commissioned and qualified, came Bernard Martin Feldman of EXPLORER INSURANCE COMPANY to me personally known to be the in-
dividual and officer described in and who executed the preceding Instrument, and he acknowledged the execution of the same, and being by me
duly sworn, deposeth and saith, that he is the said officer of the Corporation aforesaid, and that the seal affixed to the preceding instrument is
the Corporate Seal of the said Corporation, and that the said Corporate Seal and his signature as such officer were duly affixed and subscribed
to the said instrument by the authority and direction of the said Corporation.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my Official Seal, at the City of San Diego, the day and year first above
written.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
' e u oFFIciAL sEAL
' NORMA PORTER
olsry Put~ic-CNlfomla
.
......
SS:
I, the undersigned, James W. Austin, III, of the EXPLORER INSURANCE COMPANY, do hereby certify that the original POWER OF AI'rOR-
NEY, of which the loregoing is a full, true and correct copy, is in lull force a-d effect, and has not been revoked.
IN W1T. NESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my name as Secretary, and affixed the Corporate Seal of the Corporation, this
14thday of Feb~ ~9 95
EXP CAL 37
EXPLORER INSURANCE COMPANY
t~l | I UI' I[MC~ULA, PUI~LJ(,; WL)HK~ L)[I"'AHTMENT
CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT AND FINAL RELEASE
This is to certify that ,Tobo C. Croul , (hereinafter the * undersigned °)
declares to the C~/of Temecula, under oath, that it has paid in full for all materials, supplies,
labor, services, tools, equipment, end ell other bills contracted for by the undersigned or by any
of the undersigned's agents, employees or subcontractors used or in contribution to the execution
of its contract with the City of Temecuia with regard to the building, erection, construction, or
repair of that certain work of improvement known as PROJECT NO. 94-04 YNEZ ROAD
LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENT PLANS situated in the City of Temecula, State of California, more
particularly described as follows:
Project No, 94-04 - Ynez Road Landscape ~aprove~e~t Plan-
INSERT TITLE OF WORK HERE
The undersigned declares that it knows of no unpaid debts or claims arising out of Mid
Contract which would constitute grounds for any third party to claim a stop notice of any unpaid
sums owing to the undersigned.
Further, for valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the
undersigned does hereby fully release and acquit the City of Temecuia and all agents. and
employees of the City, end each of them, from any and all claims, debts, demands, or causes of
action which exist or might exist in favor of the undersigned by reason of the Contract executed
between the undersigned and the City of Temecula or which relate in any way to the work
performed by the undersigned with regard to the above-referenced construction project,
Further, the undersigned expressly acknowledges its awareness of, and waives the benefits
of, Section 1542 of the Civil Code of the State of California which provides: "A general release
does not extend to claims which the creditor does not know or suspect to exist in his favor at the
time of executing the release, which if known by him must have materially affected his settlement
with the debtor.'
This release is intended to be e full and general release of any and all claims which the
undersigned now has or may, in the future, have against the City of Temecula and/or its agents
and employees with regard to any matter arising from the construction of the above-referenced
project or the Contract between the City of Temecula and the Contractor with respect thereto,
whether such claims are now known or ~ d
unknown or ere suspe o~nsulnected.
NTRA F '
CO CTO
Dated: 2-14-95 By: ~ ~
S,
Print Name and Title
RELEASE R-1 v
C.8, LIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT .o. ~.o7
State of ca].~orn.ta
County of oranse
On 2-1z,-95 before me, sat7 ?. ~t~ - sota.=7 ?ub~i.c ,
DATE NAME, TITLE OF OFFICER - E.G.. 'JANE DOE. NOTARY PUBUC'
personally appeared 3olin c. crou.1. ,
NAME(S) OF SIGNER(S)
[] personally known to me - OR - [] proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence
to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are
subscribed to the within instrument and ac-
knowledged to me that he/she/they executed
the same ,in his/her/their authorized
capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their
signature(s) on the instrument the person(s),
or the entity upon behalf of which the
person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
OPTIONAL
Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent
fraudulent reattachment of this form.
CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER
[] INDIVIDUAL
[] CORPORATE OFFICER
DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT
TITLE(S)
[] PARTNER(S) [] LIMITED
[] GENERAL
[] ATTORNEY-IN-FACT
[] TRUSTEE(S)
[] GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR
[] OTHER:
TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT
NUMBER OF PAGES
DATE Of DOCUMENT
SIGNER IS REPRESENTING:
NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITY(IES)
Eaei~a.].~l ]-aadscape Sez'rJ.ces SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE
01993 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION · 8236 Reinmet Ave., P.O. Box 7184 * ~anoga Park, CA 91309-7184
RECORDING REQUEBTen BY
AND RETURN TO:.
CrrYQ.BIK
crrY of TBtaECULA
43174 Buebeee Perk Dde
Temeceale, CA 92~90
IPACE
NOTICE OF COMPLETION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT:
1. The City of Temecula is the owner of the Ixolarty hereinafter described.
2. The full address of the City of Temecula is 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula,
California 92590.
3. A Contract was awarded by the City of Temecula to Emerald Landscape Service to
perform the following work of imlxovement:
PW94-04 Ynez Road Landscaping Improvements.
4. Said work was completed by Mid company according to plane and specffications and
to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works of the City of Temecula and that said work was
accepted by The CiTy Council of the CiTy of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on FebmaW 28,
1995. That upon Mid contract the EXPLORER INSURANCE COMPANY was surety for the bond given
by the said company as required by law.
5. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the City of
Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, and is described as follows: PROJECT PW 944)4.
6. The street address of said property is: YNEZ ROAD PROM RANCHO CAUFORNIA
ROAD TO WINCHESTER ROAD.
Dated at Temecula, Califomia, this _ day of
· 1995.
JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )
CITY OF TEMECULA )
as
I, June S. Greek, C. jty Clerk of the City of Temecula, Califomis and do hereby certify under penalty of
perjury, that the foregoing NOTICE OF COMPLETION is true and correct, and that Mid NOTICE OF
COMPLETION was duly and regularly ordered to be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder of
Riverside by Mid City Coundl.
Dated at Temecula, Colifomia, this day of
·1995.
JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk
l:~'mdCIP-4)01Rev. 12-f,-91 pwO4%pw94-O4~m~letn.not 021595
CIT~ OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Bond No. 131 11 11
KNOW ALL MEI IV THEIE FltglINTI THAT: "
Fan=add/andscape SezTlce8 - P.O, 8oz 63 ],aFme ]~scb, Ca 92652
NAM/,4ND ADDRE:~ OF CONTRACTOR
e znaiviauat . hereirmfter called Principal, and
]Cxplore:~ T-euraalce Compass7 - 10140 Callms :~o~nt DEc, Seas D~e~o, Ca 92Z21
NAME AND ,A~ OF SURETY
heroinafter called SURE'r% Ire held end firmly bmald unto CITY OF TEMECULA,
hemlnafter eelled OWNER, in the penal sum of
*SRX SglJ)e* DOt/jUtS I~ *SRX. SalVIa* Gglrll (Is, 896.2q trl lawful money of the
United Suitel, for the peyrrleflt of whil~l Ilall well end truly tO be made, we bind ourselves,
successors end aledana, joimiy end eeverelly, firmly by them preeenta.
THE CONDITION OF THIS 01LIGATION Is such that v.h,,se, the larirmtpal entead into e cartab
Contract with the OWNER, dated the 10th day el Nay ,11.94 , a copy of which is
hereto etachad end made a pert hereof forthe conetruqdon of PROJECT NO. 9444 YNEZ ROAD
WHIRgAB, Mid Contact providel thee the Prtncllal will fumlah · bond eorglitjonecf to guarantee
for the padod of one year after approval of the final eatimam on said job, by the OWNER, against
all defects in workmanship end matedab which my beDcaw apparent dudn0 said pedod; and
WHIREAI, the e~ld Contact hew been completed, and wee approve on Feivu~r~ ct
NOW, THIREFORI, THE CONDITION OF THll OIUOATION 18 IUCH, that if within one War from
the deui of al~rovel of the setd Contreat, the work done urder the terme of Mid Contreat chill ·
diN:loll Door w0rkmeruhip in the exeoution of Mid work, 81xI the carryIno out of the tern of ,aid
Contract, ~ it shall appear thee dolecalve metedale were fumeabed thereunder, then this obligeion
· hell remain in full foroe end virtue, otherwlee thb irmrument ehell be void.
*RI~ TBOUSAND EI{~rr HUNDRED NINWL'I SIX A]]D 20/100'
MAImINAI~I 10140 Id-1
Signed 8hd seem fide Z~th dey of February
(Soil)
8UJ~TV Explorer Imm~mrf
Les P-ntZe
(NilTie)
A~torney in Face
fTjtJl)
S~Ott F:. I~leid, City Anomey
(Name)
mum}
CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
State of
County of o=ange
On 2-14-95
DATE
personally appeared
before me, Nat7 ~, )!attJ4po~ - liotac7 :eub::Ltc .
NAME, TITLE OF OFFICER - E.G., 'JANE DOE, NOTARY PUeUC'
T-eS !~ntle
NAME(S) OF SIGNER(S)
[] personally known to me - OR - [] proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence
to be the person(31~ whose name(B) isj~a~z
subscribed to the within instrument and ac-
knowledged to me that he/eaeFe~ executed
the same in his/r.=3~'/~l~ authorized
capacityOmaJci and that by
signature(=) on the instrument the personal),
or the entity upon behalf of which the
person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
OPTIONAL
Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent
fraudulent reattachment of this form.
CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER
[] INDIVIDUAL
[] CORPORATE OFFICER
DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT
TITLE(S)
[] PARTHER(S) [] UMITED
[] GENERAL
[] ATTORNEY-IN-FACT
[] TRUSTEE(S)
[] GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR
[] OTHER:
TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT
NUMBER OF PAGES
DATE OF DOCUMENT
SIGNER IS REPRESENTING:
NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTffY(IES)
Ex"pZorer 'rnsurance Cospansy
SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE
{)1993 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION, 8236 Rammet Ave., P.O. Box 7184, Canoga PAW,, CA 91309-7184
Explorer Insurance Company
HOME OFF1CE: SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA
Certified Copy of
POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the EXPLORER INSURANCE COMPANY, a CorporaUon duly authorized and existing underthe,,
laws of the State of ARIZONA end having its principal office in the City of San Diego. California. does hereby nominate. constitute and appoint:
Les Mantle
its true and lawful Attorney(s)4n-Fact, with full power and authority hereby conferred In its name. place end stead. to execute. cast, acknowledge
and deliver any end all bonds. undertakings. recognizances or other written obligations In the nature thereof.
This Power of Attorney is granted and is signed and sealed by facsimile under and by the authority of the following Resolution adopted by the
Board of Directors of the EXPLORER INSURANCE COMPANY st · meeting duly called and held on the 22rid day of JULY. 1985. which Mid
Resolution his not been amended of rescinded and of which the following is s b'ue, full, and complete copy:
'RESOLVED: That the President of Secretsty may from time to time appoint Attofneys-in-Fact to represent and act tor and on behalf ofthe
Company, and either the President of Secretst,/, the Board of Directors or Executive Committee may at any time remove luch Attomeys4n-Fact
and revoke the Power of Attorney given him or her; and be It further
RESOLVED: That the Attorney-in-Fact may be given full power to execute for and in the name of end on behalf of the C~mpany any end ell
bonds and undertakings as the business of the Company may require, and any such bonds or unclerteklnga executed by any much Attorney-In-
Fact shall be as binding upon the Company as if signed by the Resident and sealed and attested by the Secretary."
IN WiTNESS'WHEREOF, EXPLORER INSURANCE COMPANY has caused its official seal to be hereunto affixed and these presents to be
signed by its duly authorized officers this
7th day of August, 1990
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
EXPLORER INSURANCE COMPANY
1990
A g s t, before the subscriber. a Notary Pub, c of the State of CalifOrnia. in and for the County of Sen Diego,
Onthis 7th day of u u
duly commissioned and qualified, came Bomard Martin Feldman of EXPLORER INSURANCE COMPANY to me personally known to be the in-
dividual and officer described in and who executed the preceding Instrument, and he acknowledged the execution of the same. and being by me
duly sworn, deposeth and saith, that he is the said officer of the Corporation aforesaid, and that the seal affixed to the preceding instrument is
the Corporate Seal of the said Cofporation, and that the said Corporate Seal and his signature is such officor were duly affixed and subscribed
to the said Instrument by the authority and direction of the said Corporation.
IN WiTNESS WHEREOF, I hav_e_h_er_eu_n~ se_t _my h_a_nd a_nd_ aff!xe_d my Official Seal, st the City of Sen Diego, the day and year first above
written.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
OFFICIAL SEAL
NORMA PORTER
Notary Pubitc-Cellfoml8
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
My Comm. ExC. Jan. 8. 1992
SS:
I, the undersigned, James W. Austin, ill, of the EXPLORER INSURANCE COMPANY, do hereby certify that the original POWER OF All'OR-
NEY, of which the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy. is in full force a-d effect. and has not been revoked.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my name is Secretary, and affixed the Corporate Seal of the Corporation, this
14thday of February 19 95
EXPLORER INSURANCE C~.MPANY
EX~ CAL 37
~11 I Ut' |~,M*'L;ULA, PUI=ILIL; WL)PII~ L)I~IJAR'TMENT
CONTRACTORS AFFIDAVIT AND RNAL RELEASE
Thisistocertifythst Joim C. Czo.~ ,(hereinafterthe "undersigned*)
declare to the City of Temecula, under oath, that it has paid in full for all materials, supplies,
labor, services, tools, equipment, end ell other bills contracted for by the undersigned or by shy,
of the undersigned's agents, employees or subcontractors used or in contribution to the execution
of its contract with the City of Temecula with regard to the building, erection, construction, or
repair of that certain work of improvement known as PROJECT NO. 94-04 YNEZ ROAD
LANDSCAPE IMPROVEVIENT PLANS situated in the City of Temecula, State of California, more
particularly described as follows:
Project lio. 94~0~ - Ynez Road Landscape Improvement PI=n-
INSERT TITLE OF WORK HERE
The undersigned declares that it knows of no unpaid debts or claims arising out of said
Contract which would constitute grounds for any third party to claim a stop notice of any unpaid
sums owing to the undersigned.
Further, for valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the
undersigned does hereby fully release and acquit the City of Temecula and all agents: and
employees of the City, end each of them, from any end all claims, debts, demands, or causes of
action which exist or might exist in favor of the undersigned by reason of the Contract executed
between the undersigned and the City of Temecuis or which relate in any way to the work
performed by the undersigned with regard to the above-referenced construction project.
Further, the undersigned expressly acknowledges its awareness of, and waives the benefits
of, Section 1542 of the Civil Code of the State of Califomia which provides: 'A general release
does not extend to claims which the creditor does not know or suspect to exist in his favor st the
time of executing the release, which if known by him must have materially affected his settlement
with the debtor.'
This release is intended to be a full and general release of any and all claims which the
undersigned now has or may, in the future, have against the City of Temecula and/or its agents
and employees with regard to any matter arising from the construction of the above-referenced
project or the Contract between the City of Temecula and the Contractor with respect thereto,
whether such claims are now known or ~ ~;)
unknown or 8re suspe or nsulr}ected.
CONTHAGt'OF/R:
Dated: 2-14-95
S
Print Name end T'~le
RELEASE I~.1
CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT .o..o7
State of Cal~foZZLta
County of (:)z',,-,Se
On 2-14-95
DATE
personally appeared
before me,
3obo c. ct-oul
NAME, TTTLE OF OFFICER - E,G., 'JANE DOE, NOTARY PUBUC'
NAME(S) OF SIGNER(S)
MyCornre. t934597
[] personally known to me - OR - [] proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence
to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are
subscribed to the within instrument and ac-
knowledged to me that he/she/they executed
the same in his/her/their authorized
capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their
signature(s) on the instrument the person(s),
or the entity upon behalf of which the
person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
OPTIONAL
Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent
fraudulent reattachment of this form.
CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER
[] INDIVIDUAL
[] CORPORATE OFFICER
Tm~(S~
[] PARTNER(S) [] LIMITED
[] GENERAL
[] A'I'rORNEY-IN-FACT
[] TRUSTEE(S)
[] GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR
[] OTHER:
SIGNER IS REPRESENTING:
NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTTTY(ES)
beeza],4 ~mdsc~pe Sez'vJ. ces
DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT
TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT
NUMBER OF PAGES
DATE OF DOCUMENT
SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE
01993 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION · 8236 Itemmet Ave., P.O. Box 7184 ,, Canoga Park, CA 91309-7184
ITEM 9
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
February 28, 1995
Focused Model Development (Traffic - SWAPD)
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council:
Approve the four (4) party agreement - Cities of Temecula, Murrieta, Western Riverside
Council of Governments, and Hank Mohle and Associates Agreement for Professional
Services, Southwest Area Planning District (SWAPD) Traffic Study - Focused Model
Development.
2. Authorize the Mayor or his designated representative to sign the agreement.
Award of contract is subject to approval of Mid-Year Budget request of $12,500 for
that purpose·
BACKGROUND:
The Cities of Temecula and Murrieta recently received a grant for $100,000for the I-15/I-215
Corridor Planning. That study will address the problems on the local street system in the
proximity of the two (2) Interstate Highways.
In order to have adequate input into the sources and potential solutions to the existing corridor
problems, much larger area must be considered. This area, for study purposes, is Southwest
Area Planning District (SWAPD). The area includes the Cities of Temecula, Murrieta, Lake
Elsinore and Canyon Lake, as well as portions of unincorporated areas of Riverside County.
The primary objective of this study is to determine the impact of projected traffic volumes
within this area on the overall system to include I-15/I-21 5 Corridor. Therefore, much of the
information of the SWAPD Focused Model Development will be utilized for the I-15/I-215
Corridor Study.
SWAPD Focused Model will extensively address the traffic issues in the areas of Temecula and
Murrieta as well as the immediately adjacent county area. Existing information will be utilized
from the Cities of Lake Elsinore and Canyon Lake and superimposed on the SWAPD model for
this immediate area to determine the impacts, if any, of the traffic in those two (2) cities on
the areas of Temecula and Murrieta.
I r:%g5%O228%swepd.agnlejp
The participating agencies for this study and the obligation of each is as follows.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Western Riverside Council of Governments
City of Temecula
City of Murrieta
SCAG - Provides Information
City of Lake Elsinore - Provides Traffic Information
City of Canyon Lake - Provides Traffic Information
$25,000
$12,500
$12,500
It should be pointed out that there is a good possibility that our portion of the cost may be
funded by STP. Request for these funds ($12,500)has been submitted.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The maximum costs to the City of Temecula is $12,500· This is subject to the approval of ·
the Mid-Year Budget request for funds to be transferred from access revenues to Account No.
100-164-602-5248for the purpose of this study.
Potentially, there will be no cost to the City, if STP funding request is approved.
Attachment:
Southwest Area Planning District Focused Model Development;
Agreement for Professional Services
2 r:%95%O228%ewepd .agnlajp
AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
SOUTHWEST AREA PLANNING DISTRICT (SWAPD)
FOCUSED MODEL DEVELOPMENT
The WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS (WRCOG), CITY OF
MURRIETA, CITY OF TEMECULA, and HANK MOHLE AND ASSOCIATES, effective
1995, do hereby mutually agree as follows:
I. PARTIES:
The parties to this agreement are WRCOG, the CITY OF MURRIETA, and the CITY
OF TEMECULA (hereinafter collectively referred to as "AGENCIES"), and HANK
MOHLE AND ASSOCIATES, an engineering consultant firm acting as an independent
contractor corporation (hereinafter referred to as "CONSULTANT").
OBLIGATIONS OF CONSULTANT:
AGENCIES, pursuant to this agreement, hereby contract with CONSULTANT to act
on their behalf directly and indirectly and in conjunction with AGENCIES' staff in
providing the tasks as contained in the Scope of Work attached hereto as Exhibit A.
CONSULTANT shall be responsible for tasks designated "HMA" under Lead Agency.
The scope of services to be provided by CONSULTANT apply only to the area contained
within the area referred to as the "Southwest Area Planning District," as shown on the
map attached hereto as Exhibit B.
ADMINISTRATION OF CONSULTING CONTRACT:
AGENCIES hereby appoint the Executive Director of WRCOG (hereinafter referred to
as Executive Director), or his designee or designees, in the application of AGENCIES'
rights hereunder, and as AGENCIES' representative(s) in the review and administration
of the work performed by CONSULTANT pursuant to the terms of CONSULTANT's
Scope of Work. CONSULTANT and Executive Director, or his designee(s), shall meet
as necessary for the purpose of discussing the project.
PROJECT SCHEDULE AND SUBMITTAL DATES:
CONSULTANT shall perform the designated "HMA" tasks contained in the Scope of.
Work in accordance with the schedule included with the Scope of Work attached hereto
as Exhibit A.
,
TERM:
This agreement shall become effective upon execution as authorized by the Executive
Director and by the Directors of Public Works for both cities, or their designees as noted
above, and shall terminate, if not terminated pursuant to the provisions contained
hereinbelow, or otherwise extended by all parties, , 1995.
COMPENSATION:
CONSULTANT shall submit monthly invoices to the Assistant Director of WRCOG,
which shall be due and payable within thirty (30) days. The hourly rates for services
shall be as shown in Exhibit "C" attached to this contract and herein incorporated by..
reference. Notwithstanding the above payment schedule, all monies shall be due, except
as provided for hereinbelow with respect to cancellation at the convenience of
AGENCIES or for reasons of nonl~.rformance. The total amount payable to
CONSULTANT for services pursuant to this agreement shall not exceed fifty thousand
dollars ($50,000.00).
It is understood the cities of Murrieta and Temecula are each responsible for reimbursi.ng
WRCOG the amount of twelve thousand five hundred dollars ($12,500.00) from each
city in order to provide fifty percent (50%) funding for the CONSULTANT services.
WRCOG shall invoice each city within thirty (30) days of the effective date of this
agreement for twelve thousand five hundred dollars ($12,500.00). Each city shall
reimburse WRCOG within thirty (30) days of the receipt of the WRCOG invoice.
INTEREST OF CONSULTANT:
CONSULTANT may not conduct business for third parties that may be in conflict with
CONSULTANT's responsibilities under this contract. CONSULTANT may not solicit
any business during the term of this contract that conflicts with his or her responsibilities
under the contract.
HOLD HARMLESS:
CONSULTANT agrees to save, indemnify, hold harmless, and defend (with attorneys
approved by AGENCIES) AGENCIES, their officers, agents, employees, and
independent contractors from and against all liability, claims, costs, and expenses
(including, without limitation, attorney's fees) arising from loss of or damage to any
property whatsoever or injury to or death of any person whomsoever caused or
occasioned by the negligent or wrongful act or omission of CONSULTANT or any agent
or employee of CONSULTANT, arising out of or in connection with this agreement or
!malnsdsaane~laXttmm0194 .~f 2
10.
ll.
the work to be performed by CONSULTANT hereunder.
TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT FOR CAUSE:
If, through any cause, CONSULTANT shall fail to fulfill in a timely and proper manner
his obligations under this agreement, or if CONSULTANT shall violate any of the
covenants, agreements, or stipulations of this agreement, AGENCIES shall have the fight
to terminate this agreement by giving written notice to CONSULTANT of such
termination and specifying the effective date thereof. In that event, all finished or
unfinished documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, reports, and other
materials as stated hereinbelow prepared by CONSULTANT shall, at the option of
AGENCIES, become the property of AGENCIES, and CONSULTANT shall be entitled
to receive compensation in accordance with this contract for any work satisfactorily
completed on such documents and other materials up to the effective date of notice of
termination, not to exceed the amounts payable hereinabove, less any appropriate offset.
TERMINATION FOR CONVENIENCE OF AGENCIES:
AGENCIES may terminate this agreement at any time and without cause by giving
written notice to CONSULTANT of such termination at least fifteen (15) days before the
effective date of such termination. In that event, all finished and unfinished documents
and other .materials described hereinbelow shall, at the option of AGENCIES, become
AGENCIES' sole and exclusive property. If the agreement is terminated by AGENCIES
as provided in this paragraph, CONSULTANT shall be entitled to receive compensation
in accordance with this contract for any work completed on such documents and other
materials to the effective date of such termination. CONSULTANT hereby expressly
waives any and all claims for damages or compensation arising under this agreement
except as set forth hereinabove in the event of such termination.
ASSIGNABILITY:
CONSULTANT shall not assign or subcontract any interest in this agreement, shall not
transfer any interest in the same (whether by assignment or novation), and shall not
delegate any performance hereunder (including hiring or retaining use of any other
person or entity for any purpose) without prior written consent of AGENCIES, provided,
however, that claims for money due or to become due to CONSULTANT from
AGENCIES under this agreement may be assigned to a bank, trust company, or other
financial institution without such approval. Notice of such assignment or transfer shall
be furnished promptly to AGENCIES. Any assignment requiring approval may not be
further assigned without AGENCIES approval.
12.
13.
14.
15.
OWNERSHIP. PUBLICATION. REPRODUCTION. AND USE OF MATERIAL:
All reports, studies, information, data, statistics, forms, designs, plans, procedures,
systems, and any other materials or properties produced under this agreement shall be
the sole and exclusive property of AGENCIES. No such materials or properties
produced in whole or in part under this agreement shall be subject to private use,
copyrights, or patent right by CONSULTANT in the United States or in any other
country without the express written consent of AGENCIES. AGENCIES shall have
unrestricted authority to publish, disclose (as may be limited by the provisions of the
Public Records Act), distribute, and otherwise use, copyright, or patent, in whole or in
part, any such reports, studies, data, statistics, forms, or other materials or properties
produced under this agreement.
INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR:
AGENCIES are interested only in the results obtained, and CONSULTANT shall
perform as an independent contractor with sole control of the manner and means of
performing the services required under this agreement. AGENCIES maintain the right
only to reject or accept CONSULTANT's final work product as each phase of this
agreement is completed. CONSULTANT and any of CONSULTANT's agents,
employees, or representatives are, for all purposes under this agreement, an independent
contractor, and shall not be deemed to be an employee of AGENCIES, and none of them
shall be entitled to any benefits to which AGENCIES' employees are entitled, including,
but not limited to, overtime, retirement benefits, worker's compensation benefits, injury
leave, or other leave benefits.
CHANGES:
AGENCIES may from time to time require changes in the scope of the services by
CONSULTANT to be performed under this agreement. Such changes, including any
increase or decrease in the amount of CONSULTANT's compensation, that are mutually
agreed upon by AGENCIES and CONSULTANT shall be effective as amendments to
this agreement only when in writing, and no amendments shall increase the total amount
payable by more than ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00) without approval of the two City
Councils.
GENERAL CONDITIONS
CONSULTANT shall provide no services for any private client within the
corporate boundaries or sphere of influence of AGENCIF-_,S during the period of
this agreement that may constitute a conflict of interest. CONSULTANT shall
be bound by the requirements of the FPPC (and State law) with regard to
B,
Cm
disclosure of financial interests and prohibited conflicts of interest.
AGENCIES shall not be called upon to assume and CONSULTANT shall save,
defend, indemnify, and hold harmless AGENCIES against any liability or claim
for the direct payment of any salary, wage, or other compensation to any person
employed by CONSULTANT performing services hereunder for AGENCIES or
for any employee-related claims, including, but not limited to, worker's
compensation claims. The parties understand and agree that CONSULTANT is
acting strictly as an independent contractor under the terms of this agreement, and
this agreement is not intended to establish an employer-employee relationship
between AGENCIES, on the one hand, and CONSULTANT or any of its
employees, on the other hand.
If and when permitted hereunder, all officers, agents, employees, subcontractors,
their agents, officers, and employees who are hired by or engaged by
CONSULTANT in the performance of this agreement shall be deemed off'leers,
agents, employees, and subcontractors of CONSULTANT, and AGENCIES shall
not be liable or responsible to such personnel for anything whatsoever.
CONSULTANT agrees to indemnify, save, keep, and hold harmless AGENCIES
and all of their officers and employees from all damages, costs, or expenses tn
law and equity including, but not limited to, costs of suit and attorney's fees and
expenses for legal services that may at any time arise or be set up because of
damage to property or injury to persons received or suffered by reason of any
negligent or other actionable act or omission on the part of CONSULTANT or
any its agents, officers, employees, and subcontractors in the performance of this
agreement. Payment to CONSULTANT of compensation hereunder shall not be
deemed to waive AGENCIES' fights or CONSULTANT's obligations hereunder.
CONSULTANT agrees to and shall at its own cost and expense procure and
maintain during the term of this agreement general liability insurance in an
amount of not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) per occurrence and
annual aggregate. Such insurance shall be procured from an insurer authorized
to do business in California. AGENCIES shall be named as additional insureds,
and the insurance required hereunder' shall be primary and not contributing with
any other insurance available to or obtained by AGENCIES. In addition,
CONSULTANT shall obtain Worker's Compensation Insurance covering all of
its employees (where such employment or retention is approved by AGENCIES
hereunder) as required by law. CONSULTANT shall obtain professional liability
insurance in the amount of one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) per occurrence
and annual aggregate. CONSULTANT shall provide AGENCIES with satisfactory
evidence that such insurance has been paid. Certificates of Insurance shall be
filed with AGENCIES and shall contain provisions that AGENCIES will be given
p~31x3td~meculaXdm~Oi94.wpr 5
E,
H,
thirty (30) days' written notice in advance of cancellation of any policy of
insurance.
In the event any action is brought by either party to construe this agreement or
enforce any of its terms, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its
reasonable attorney's fees and costs incurred, whether or not the matter proceeds
to judgment.
Upon termination of this agreement as provided hereinabove, CONSULTANT
shall, within such reasonable period as may be directed by the Executive
Director, complete those items of work that are in various stages of completion
and that the Executive Director determines are necessary to be completed by..
CONSULTANT to allow the project to be completed in a timely, logical, and
orderly manner. Upon termination, all finished or unfinished documents, data,
studies, surveys, drawings, models, photographs, reports, and other material
prepared by CONSULTANT under this agreement shall be delivered to the
Executive Director upon request, as property of AGENCIES.
The rights and remedies of AGENCIES provided in this agreement are not
intended to be exclusive, and are in addition to any other rights and remedies
permitted by law.
CONSULTANT does not currently anticipate using subcontractors other than as
stated in Exhibit A for performance of its services under this agreement. In the
event subcontractors are anticipated in the future, CONSULTANT shall first
obtain the prior written consent of AGENCIES through the Executive Director.
CONSULTANT has provided a listing of personnel in the attached Exhibit A.
These personnel shall not be removed or replaced without the prior written
concurrence of AGENCIES through the Executive Director.
In performing all services hereunder, CONSULTANT shall comply with all
applicable laws and regulations of AGENCIES and/or all other relevant
government agencies. Also, CONSULTANT certifies and agrees that all persons
employed by CONSULTANT, its affiliates, subsidiaries, and related entities, if
any, will be treated equally by CONSULTANT, without unlawful discrimination
based upon creed, sex, race, or national origin. If AGENCIES find that any of
the provisions of this paragraph have been violated, such violation shall constitute
a material breach of this agreement upon which AGENCIES may determine to
cancel, terminate, or suspend the agreement. While AGENCIES reserve the right
to determine independently that the antidiscrimination provisions of the agreement
have been violated, in addition, a determination by the California Fair
Employment Practices Commission, or successor agency, or the Federal Equal
!malmsal'dnn~.ula~dmm0194.,tpf 6
L,
Employment Opportunity Commission, or successor agency, that CONSULTANT
has violated State or Federal antidiscrimination laws relative to this agreement
shall constitute a finding by AGENCIES that CONSULTANT has violated the
antidiscrimination provisions of this agreement.
Notices or correspondence relating to this agreement shall be in writing. Any
notices to be given hereunder shall be effective when personally delivered, or two
(2) days after placing in the United States Mail by certified mail, postage prepaid,
and addressed to the party to whom the notice is directed. The current addresses
of the parties are as follows:
AGENCIES
Assistant Director
Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG)
3737 Main Street, Suite 420
Riverside, CA 92501
CONSULTANT
R. Henry Mohle
Hank Mohle & Associates
901 East Imperial Highway, Suite A
LaHabra, CA 90631
Work to be performed by CONSULTANT hereunder shall commence
immediately, and upon commencement of such work, CONSULTANT's right to
compensation therefor shall thereupon accrue.
CONSULTANT agrees that AGENCIES or any of their duly authorized
representatives shall at any reasonable time during regular business hours have
access to and the right to examine, audit, excerpt, copy, or transcribe any
pertinent transaction, activity, time and work records, employment records, or
other records relating to this agreement. Such material, including all pertinent
cost accounting, financial records, and proprietary data, must be kept and
maintained by CONSULTANT for a period of at least four (4) years or for the
period required by law, whichever is greater, after completion of
CONSULTANT' s performance hereunder, unless AGENCIES' written permission
is given to dispose of same prior to that time.
Except as otherwise provided by law, all reports, communications, documents,
and information obtained or prepared by CONSULTANT in connection with its
work hereunder, shall not be published without prior consent of the Executive
Director, nor shall CONSULTANT issue any news releases or publish
information relating to its work hereunder without the prior consent of the
Executive Dii'ector.
p~uhXdmmO194.wpf 7
Oe
Qe
The invalidity in whole or in part of any provision hereof shall not void or affect
the validity of any other provision.
No waiver or breach of any provision hereof by either party shall constitute a
waiver of any other or future breach. Failure of either party to enforce any
provision hereof at any time or from time to time shall not be construed as a
waiver thereof.
This agreement is intended to be binding on the parties, and their respective
successors and assigns. The plural shall include the singular, and the singular
shall include the plural and neuter wherever the context so requires.
CONSULTANT will perform the services set out in this agreement, as
contemplated herein, in an efficient, timely, and professional manner and in
accordance with generally accepted standards for performing similar services. It
is understood that the AGENCIES, in entering into this agreement, are relying
on CONSULTANT's representations for quality and professional work performed
in a timely manner, and CONSULTANT shall perform in accordance with those
representations and standards.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have accepted, made, and executed this
agreement upon the terms, conditions, and provisions above stated.
CONSULTANT: Hank Mohle & Associates
By:
R. Henry Mohle
President
AGENCIES:
City of Murrieta
Western Riverside Council of Governments
By: By:
Ben Minamide
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
A.J. Wilson
Executive Director
pralxsuBtemcc uh~rhmoO 194 .wpf 8
City of Temecula
By:
Ronald E. Bradley
City Manager
ProPq:sul~temccuh\rlsm°O194-wPj~ 0
SW APD FOCUSED MODEL
SCOPE OF WORK
1.0 TAZ DEVELOPMENT
1,1 Realign Local TAZ's with Census
Geography
EXHIBIT A
SCOPE OF WORK
1.2 Develop Correspondence Tables
SW APD FOCUSED MODEL SCHEDULE
I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX
XXXX XXXX X
1.1,1 Adjust Local TAZ's to Census
Block Boundaries XXX
1.1.2 Adjust Local TAZ's to reflect 1990
and General Plan land use XX X
1.1.3 Provide maps for SCAG and local
agency review XX
1.1.4 Design centroid and centroid
connector system XXX
1.1.5 Provide WRCOG with TAZ Map in
.dxf format for conversion X
XXXX X
1.2.1 Use Polygon Overlay on Block ID's
to generate Table
1.2.2 Aggregate 1990 block data to
TAZ's
1.2.3 Add Geocoded data for 1990 o
1994 derived from permit data
XX
XX
X
LEAD AGENCY RESP. POSITION
HMA EJN
WRCOGISCAG JWISB/-SS
2.0 NETWORK DEVELOPMENT
2, 1 Road Network - Focused Area
2.1,1 Obtain Centerline coverage from
Riverside Co. I SCAG
2.1.2 Clip Coverage to SW APD
2.1.3 Select arcs for Model Network
2.1.4 Delete unnecessary arcs / nodes
2.1,5 Add Centroid and Zone
Connectors
2.1.6 Edit CTP network near SW APD
Boundary to match focus area
2.1.7 Create Check Plots I ArcView
views for Review
2.1.8 Edit final network and convert to
TranPlan
2.2 Road Network - Outside Focused
Area
2.2.1 Generalize Zones outside focus
area
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX
XXXX XXXX XXX
X
X
XX
X
XX
XX
X XXX
XXXXXXXXXXXX
SCAG
Page I
SW APD FOCUSED MODEL
SCOPE OF WORK
2,2.2 Drop all zone connectors,
primary/secondary roads from
LA,OR,VEN
2.2.3 Add back new zone connectors to
LA, ORA, VEN
2.2.4 Combine networks and check in
TranPlan
2.2.5 Create Plots and ArcView views
for review
2.2.6 Edit network and test in TranPlan
2.3 Transit Network o Outside Focused
Area
2.3.1 Create transit network outside
focus area
2.3.2 Add transit zone connectors - walk
and Park-and-ride connectors
24 Transit Network - Focused Area
,,~-.,,
,.2 Obtain transit networks from local
,~perators I TransStar (RTA/CTS)
2.4.3 Create focus area transit routes in
Arc/Info and TranPlan
2.4.4 Add transit zone connectors - walk
and Park-and-ride connectors
2.4.5 Merge and edit outside area and
focused area
2.4.5 Circulate maps / views for local
review
2.4.6 Make final edits
3.0 Network Attributes
3.1 Link Attributes
3.1.1 Create Maps/TableslArcView II
Views of focused Network
3.1.2 At Workshop in Southwest APD
distribute data and train staff
3.1.3 Local staff updates Link Attribute
data base
3.1.4 Create Check Plots and Review
3.1.5 Create Query to transfer data to
SCAG in TranPlan format
~.2 Capital Improvements Plans
(Alternative Future Networks
EXHIBIT A
SCOPE OF WORK
SW APD FOCUSED MODEL SCHEDULE
I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG
XXXX
XX
XX XXXX
XXXX
XX XXXX
XXXX XXXX
XXXX
XX XXXX
XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX
XXXX
XX XXXX
XXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXX
XXXX XXXX
XXXX
XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX
XXXX XXXX XXXX
XXXX
XXXX
XXXX XXXX
XXXX
XXXX
XXXXXXXX XXXX
LEAD AGENCY RESP. POSITION
WRCOGISCAG
JWISB
JWNRPA
SS
JW
Page 2
SW APD FOCUSED MODEL
SCOPE OF WORK
3.2 1 Create Maps/Tables/ArcView II
Views with TIP I CIP data
3.2.2 At Workshop in Southwest APD
distribute data and train staff
3.2.3 Create Check Plots and Review
3.2.4 Create QueryNiew to output
network for appropriate alternative
3.2.5 Transfer data to SCAG
3.3 Monitoring Data
3.3.1 At Workshop ID key facilities that
need to be monitored for both CMP
3.3.2 At workshop, train staff to enter
data for attributes needed to calc LOS
3.3.3 Use spreadshee'ddBASE program
to calc LOS. Insert LOS in dBASE.
3.3.4 Create Query to transfer data to
RCTC/SCAG
3.3.5 Establish schedule for annual
program
3.3.6 Create system for reviewing data in
Time Series.
4.0 Socioeconomic Data
4.1 1994 Base Year Data
EXHIBIT A
SCOPE OF WORK
4.2 Future Year
SW APD FOCUSED MODEL SCHEDULE
I 2 3 4 5 6 7
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL
XXXX
XXXX
XXXX XXXX
XXXX
XXXX XXXX X
XX
XX
X
X
X
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX
XXXX XXXX
XXXX
4.1.1 Complete permit data Collection
through June 30 DONE
4.1.2 Test and select most effective
Geocoding methods XX
4.1.3 Geocode permits / assign x,y value
to each permit XX
4.1.4 Produce Maps/TableslArcView II
views for review X
4.1.5 Write Query to produce data in
CTP format / Transfer to SCAG X
4.1.6 Aggregate to CTP Zones and
Regional Zones X
XX XXXX XXXX
4.2.1 Acquire 93 LU and new GP
Coverages from AISISCAG XX XX
4.2.2 Create Development Constraints
Coverage to help design (TAZ's) XXXX
4.2.3 Create Workshop Maps/Tables/
Views e.g. vacant land by GP LU XX
4.2.4 At workshop get input from
Planning Directors by block/taz X
8
AUG
LEAD AGENCY RESP. POSITION
JWNRPA
JW/VRPA
SS
JWISS
JW
WRCOGNRPA
WRCOG
JWISBNRPA
JWNRPA
JWNRPA
JW
JWNRPA
JWNRPA
KR
KR/JWISS
KR
KR/JWISS
KR/JW
KR/SSIJW
JWIKR
SS~RMIJW---,
JW/KRNRPA
Page 3
SW APD FOCUSED MODEL
SCOPE OF WORK
4.2.5 Transmit information to Terry Bills
in appropriate format
4.2.6 Use SAAM or alternative procedure
to distribute data
4.2.7 Create review maps/tables/views
for members
4.2.8 Create Query to transmit data to
SCAG in CTP format
4.2.9 Aggregate data to CTP Zones and
Regional Zones
4.2.10 Develop alternative SED's ???
EXHIBIT A
SCOPE OF WORK
SW APD FOCUSED MODEL SCHEDULE
I 2 3 4
JAN FEB MAR APR
X
XX
X
X
X
NOT PLANNED
5 6 7 8
MAY JUN JUL AUG
LEAD AGENCY RESP. POSITION
KR/JW
JJIKPJJW/TB
KR/JW
KR/JW
SSIKR
5.0 VALIDATION I CALIBRATION
51 Trip Distribution
5.1.1 Obtain trip length data (from O&D
for SW RSA)
5.1.2 Compare trip length Statistics from
~""-avity Model with O&D data
, .3 Introduce K-factors. if needed. to
adjust gravity model
5.2 Mode Choice
5.2.1 Compare base model mode choice
output with survey data
5.2.2 Adjust mode choice model
parameters to reflect survey data
53 Trip Assignment
5.3.1 Collect a.m.p.m. peak-hour and
24-hour count data at key locations
53.2 Work with SCAG and local
agencies to identify screenline locations
5.3.3 Work with SCAGNVRCOG to
create ArcView views of monitoring data
and model data
5.3.4 Adjust model to bring base year
model in line with count data
5.3.5 Repeat 5.3.4 to achieve NCHRP
255 standards
5.3.6 Review validation results with
SCAG / RCTC and local agencies
,~.~---,
..0 REFINEMENT OF VOLUMES
6.1 Link Volumes
X
X
XXXX XXXX XXXX
XX
X
X
XXX
X
X
XXXX XXXX
X
X
X
X
XXXX XXXX X
XXXX XXXX X
HMA/SCAG EJN
HMA EJN
Page 4
SW APD FOCUSED MODEL
SCOPE OF WORK
6.1.1 Compute delta between modeled
and counted volumes in dBASE
6.1.2 Apply delta to 2015 volumes to get
adjusted raw data
6.1.3 Convert Peak-Period volumes to
Peak-Hour volumes
6.2 Intersection Volumes
6.2.1 Work with RCTC and local
agencies to identify key intersections
6.2.2 Collect base year peak-hour
turning movement data needed for LOS
6.2.3 Use NCHRP 255 to convert
modeled volumes to turning volumes
7,0 DEFICIENCY ANALYSIS
(Cities of Mumeta and Temecula
Planning Areas only.)
7.1 Segment Analysis
7.1.1 Work with SCAGI RCTC to
identify critical segments
7.1.2 Build database necessary to
calculate LOS
7.1.3 Use AMLs (or an alternate
procedure) to calculate segment LOS
7.2 Intersection Analysis
7.2.1 Establish interface between Arclnfo
and the HMA CAPSSI program
7.2.2 Work with WRCOG et al. to put
data for LOS calcs in monitoring
database
7.2.3 Compute peak-hour LOS at key
intersections
EXHIBIT A
SCOPE OF WORK
SW APD FOCUSED MODEL SCHEDULE
1 2 3 4
JAN FEB MAR APR
5 6 7
MAY JUN JUL
X
X
X
X XXXX XXXX
X
X
X
8
AUG
LEAD AGENCY RESP, POSITION
XXXX XXXX XXXX
X
X
X XXXX XXXX
X
X HMA EJN
X
X
8.0 Alternatives Analysis (optional)
9.0 MODEL REVIEW AND
EVALUATION
9.1 Evaluate Model on Ability to Meet
CMP and Local requirements
9.2 Compare BeneFRs and Costs with
Alternatives
XXXX XX
XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX
XXXX
HMA/SCAG EJN
VRPA
Page 5
EXHIBIT C
SCHEDULE OF HOURLY RATES
EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 1995
Principal
Senior Civil Engineer (P.E.)
Senior Transportation Engineer (P.E.)
Construction Inspector
Systems Analyst
Transportation Engineer
Software Programmer
CADD Operator
Clerical
Expert Witness -- Principal (Deposition & Trial)
Subconsultants will be billed at cost plus 12%
$140.00
$110.00
$90.00
$75.00
$75.00
$60.00
$50.00
$45.00
$40.00
$250.00
Conditions of Usa~re: The above rates are typically effective for a 12-.tonth period. but HMA maintains
the right to change the billing rates at any ti.te for convenience of record keeping. Therefore. all billings
will always be at the then-current billing rates. This will not affect any agreed-upon total or not-to-
exceed fees.
INVOICES WILL BE SUBMITTED MONTHLY AND SHALL BE DUE AND
PAYABLE WITHIN 30 DAYS. A MONTHLY FINANCE CHARGE OF 1.5% SHALL
BE CHARGED ON UNPAID BALANCES.
8tno~rtsumtsL.'hmoO ! 94.doc
AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
SOUTHWEST AREA PLANNING DISTRICT (SWAPD)
FOCUSED MODEL DEVELOPMENT
The WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS 0gRCOG), CITY OF
MURRIETA, CITY OF TEMECULA, and HANK MOHLE AND ASSOCIATES, effective
1995, do hereby mutually agree as follows:
1. PARTIES:
The parties to this agreement are WRCOG, the CITY OF MURRIETA, and the CITY
OF TEMECULA (heroinafter collectively referred to as 'AGENCIES"), and HANK
MOHLE AND ASSOCIATES, an engineering consultant firm acting as an independent
contractor corporation (hereinafter referred to as "CONSULTANT").
OBLIGATIONS OF CONSULTANT:
AGENCIES, pursuant to this agreement, hereby contract with CONSULTANT to act
on their behalf directly and indirectly and in conjunction with AGENCIES' staff in
providing the tasks as contained in the Scope of Work attached hemto as Exhibit A.
CONSULTANT shall be responsible for tasks designated "HMA" under Lead Agency.
The scope of services to be provided by CONSULTANT apply only to the area contained
within the area referred to as the "Southwest Area Planning District," as shown on the
map attached hereto as Exhibit B.
ADMINISTRATION OF CONSULTING CONTRACT:
AGENCIES hereby appoint the Executive Director of WRCOG (hereinafter referred to
as Executive Director), or his designee or designees, in the application of AGENCIES'
rights hereunder, and as AGENCIES' representative(s) in the review and administration
of the work performed by CONSULTANT pursuant to the terms of CONSULTANT's
Scope of Work. CONSULTANT and Executive Director, or his designee(s), shall meet
as necessary for the purpose of discussing the project.
PROJECT SCHEDULE AND SUBMITTAL DATES:
CONSULTANT shall perform the designated "HMA" tasks contained in the Scope of
Work in accordance with the schedule included with the Scope of Work attached hereto
as Exhibit A.
,
TERM:
This agreement shall become effective upon execution as authorized by the Executive
Director and by the Directors of Public Works for both cities, or their designees as noted
above, and shall terminate, if not terminated pursuant to the provisions contained
hereinbelow, or otherwise extended by all parties, , 1995.
COMPENSATION:
CONSULTANT shall submit monthly invoices to the Assistant Director of WRCOG,
which shall be due and payable within thirty (30) days. The hourly rams for services
shall be as shown in Exhibit "C" attached to this contract and herein incorporated by
reference. Notwithstanding the above payment schedule, all monies shall be due, except
as provided for hereinbelow with respect to cancellation at the convenience of
AGENCIES or for reasons of non~rformance. The total amount payable to
CONSULTANT for services pursuant to this agreement shall not exceed fifty thousand
dollars ($50,000.00).
It is understood the cities of Murrieta and Temecula are each responsible for reimbursing
WRCOG the amount of twelve thousand five hundred dollars ($12,500.00) from each
city in order to provide fifty percent (50%) funding for the CONSULTANT services.
WRCOG shall invoice each city within thirty (30) days of the effective date of this
agreement for twelve thousand five hundred dollars ($12,500.00). Each city shall
reimburse WRCOG within thirty (30) days of the receipt of the WRCOG invoice.
INTEREST OF CONSULTANT:
CONSULTANT may not conduct business for third parties that may be in conflict with
CONSULTANT's responsibilities under this contract. CONSULTANT may not solicit
any business during the term of this contract that conflicts with his or her responsibilities
under the contract.
HOLD HARMLESS:
CONSULTANT agrees to save, indemnify, hold harmless, and defend (with attorneys
approved by AGENCIES) AGENCIES, their officers, agents, employees, and
independent contractors from and against all liability, claims, costs, and expenses
(including, without limitation, attorney's fees) arising from loss of or damage to any
property whatsoever or injury to or death of any person whomsoever caused or
occasioned by the negligent or wrongful act or omission of CONSULTANT or any agent
or employee of CONSULTANT, arising out of or in connection with this agreement or
~hhm~0194.~'!~f 2
the work to be performed by CONSULTANT hereunder.
9. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT FOR CAUSE:
If, through any cause, CONSULTANT shall fail to fulfill in a timely and proper manner
his obligations under this agreement, or if CONSULTANT shall violate any of the
covenants, agreements, or stipulations of this agreement, AGENCIES shall have the right
to terminate this agreement by giving written notice to CONSULTANT of such
termination and specifying the effective date thereof. In that event, all finished or
unfinished documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, reports, and other
materials as stated hereinbelow prepared by CONSULTANT shall, at the option of
AGENCIES, become the property of AGENCIES, and CONSULTANT shah be entitled:
to receive compensation in accordance with this contract for any work satisfactorily
completed on such documents and other materials up to the effective date of notice of
termination, not to exceed the amounts payable hereinabove, less any appropriate offset.
10. TERMINATION FOR CONVENIENCE OF AGENCIES:
AGENCIES may terminate this agreement at any time and without cause by giving
written notice to CONSULTANT of such termination at least fifteen (15) days before the
effective date of such termination. In that event, all finished and unfinished documents
and other .materials described hereinbelow shall, at the option of AGENCIES, become
AGENCIES' sole and exclusive property. If the agreement is terminated by AGENCIES
as provided in this paragraph, CONSULTANT shall be entitled to receive compensation
in accordance with this contract for any work completed on such documents and other
materials to the effective date of such termination. CONSULTANT hereby expressly
waives any and all claims for damages or compensation arising under this agreement
except as set forth hereinabove in the event of such termination.
11. ASSIGNABILITY:
CONSULTANT shall not assign or subcontract any interest in this agreement, shall not
transfer any interest in the same (whether by assignment or novalion), and shall not
delegate any performance hereunder (including hiring or retaining use of any other
person or entity for any purpose) without prior written consent of AGENCIES, provided,
however, that claims for money due or to become due to CONSULTANT from
AGENCIES under this agreement may be assigned to a bank, trust company, or other
financial institution without such approval. Notice of such assignment or transfer shall
be furnished promptly to AGENCIES. Any assignment requiring approval may not be
further assigned without AGENCIES approval.
12.
13.
14.
15.
OWNERSHIP. PUBLICATION. REPRODUCTION. AND USE OF MATERIAL:
All reports, studies, information, dam, statistics, forms, designs, plans, procedures,
systems, and any other materials or properties produced under this agreement shall be
the sole and exclusive property of AGENCIES. No such materials or properties
produced in whole or in part under this agreement shall be subject to private use,
copyrights, or patent right by CONSULTANT in the United States or in any other
country without the express written consent of AGENCIES. AGENCIES shall have
unrestricted authority to publish, disclose (as may be limited by the provisions of the
Public Records Act), distribute, and otherwise use, copyright, or patent, in whole or in
part, any such reports, studies, data, statistics, forms, or other materials or properties
produced under this agreement.
INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR:
AGENCIES are interested only in the results obtained, and CONSULTANT shall
perform as an independent contractor with sole control of the manner and means of
performing the services required under this agreement. AGENCIES maintain the right
only to reject or accept CONSULTANT's final work product as each phase of this
agreement is completed. CONSULTANT and any of CONSULTANT's agents,
employees, or representatives are, for all purposes under this agreement, an independent
contractor, and shall not be deemed to be an employee of AGENCIES, and none of them
shall be entitled to any benefits to which AGENCIES' employees are enti~ed, including,
but not limited to, overtime, retirement benefits, worker's compensation benefits, injury
leave, or other leave benefits.
CHANGES:
AGENCIES may from time to time require changes in the scope of the services by
CONSULTANT to be performed under this agreement. Such changes, including any
increase or decrease in the amount of CONSULTANT's compensation, that axe mutually
agreed upon by AGENCIES and CONSULTANT shall be effective as amendments to
this agreement only when in writing, and no amendments shall increase the total amount
payable by more than ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00) without approval of the two City
Councils.
GENERAL CONDITIONS
CONSULTANT shah provide no services for any private client within the
corporate boundaries or sphere of influence of AGENCIES during the period of
this agreement that may constitute a conflict of interest. CONSULTANT shall
be bound by the requirements of the FPPC (and State law) with regard to
disclosure of financial interests and prohibited conflicts of interest.
AGENCIES shall not be called upon to assume and CONSULTANT shall save,
defend, indemnify, and hold harmless AGENCIES against any liability or claim
for the direct payment of any salary, wage, or other compensation to any person
employed by CONSULTANT performing services hemunder for AGENCIES or
for any employee-related claims, including, but not limited to, worker's
compensation claims. The paxties understand and agree that CONSULTANT is
acting strictly as an independent contractor under the terms of this agreement, and
this agreement is not intended to establish an employer-employee relationship
between AGENCIES, on the one hand, and CONSULTANT or any of its
employees, on the other hand.
If and when permitted hereunder, all officers, agents, employees, subcontractors,
their agents,. officers, and employees who are hired by or engaged by
CONSULTANT in the performance of this agreement shall be deemed officers,
agents, employees, and subcontractors of CONSULTANT, and AGENCIES shall
not be liable or responsible to such personnel for anything whatsoever.
CONSULTANT agrees to indemnify, save, keep, and hold harmless AGENCIES
and all of their officers and employees from all damages, costs, or expenses in
law and equity including, but not limited to, costs of suit and attorney's fees and
expenses for legal services that may at any time arise or be set up because of
damage to property or injury to persons received or suffered by reason of any
negligent or other actionable act or omission on the part of CONSULTANT or
any its agents, officers, employees, and subcontractors in the performance of this
agreement. Payment to CONSULTANT of compensation hereunder shall not be
deemed to waive AGENCIES' rights or CONSULTANT' s obligations hereunder.
CONSULTANT agrees to and shall at its own cost and expense procure and
maintain during the term of this agreement general liability insurance in an
amount of not less than one million dollars ($1 ,000,0(X}.00) per occurrence and
annual aggregate. Such insurance shall be procured from an insurer authorized
to do business in California. AGENCIES shall be named as additional insureds,
and the insurance required hereunder shall be primary and not contributing with
any other insurance available to or obtained by AGENCIES. In addition,
CONSULTANT shall obtain Worker's Compensation Insurance covering all of
its employees (where such employment or retention is approved by AGENCIES
hereunder) as required by law. CONSULTANT shall obtain professional liability
insurance in the amount of one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) per occurrence
and annual aggregate. CONSULTANT shall provide AGENCIES with satisfactory
evidence that such insurance has been paid. Certificates of Insurance shall be
filed with AGENCIES and shall contain provisions that AGENCIES will be given
G,
thirty (30) days' written notice in advance of cancellation of any policy of
insurance.
In the event any action is brought by either party to construe this agreement or
enforce any of its terms, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its
reasonable attorney's fees and costs incurred, whether or not the matter proceeds
to judgment.
Upon termination of this agreement as provided hereinabove, CONSULTANT
shall, within such reasonable period as may be directed by the Executive
Director, complete those items of work that are in various stages of completion
and that the Executive Director determines are necessary to be completed by
CONSULTANT to allow the project to be completed in a timely, logical, and
orderly manner. Upon termination, all finished or unfinished documents, data,
studies, surveys, drawings, models, photographs, reports, and other material
prepared by CONSULTANT under this agreement shall be delivered to the
Executive Director upon request, as property of AGENCIES.
The rights and remedies of AGENCIES provided in this agreement are not
intended to be exclusive, and are in addition to any other rights and remedies
permitted by law.
CONSULTANT does not currently anticipate using subcontractors other than as
stated in Exhibit A for performance of its services under this agreement. In the
event subcontractors are anticipated in the future, CONSULTANT shall first
obtain the prior written consent of AGENCIES through the Executive Director.
CONSULTANT has provided a listing of personnel in the attached Exhibit A.
These personnel shall not be removed or replaced without the prior written
concurrence of AGENCIES through the Executive Director.
In performing all services hereunder, CONSULTANT shall comply with all
applicable laws and regulations of AGENCIES and/or all other relevant
government agencies. Also, CONSULTANT certifies and agrees that all persons
employed by CONSULTANT, its affiliates, subsidiaries, and related entities, if
any, will be treated equally by CONSULTANT, without unlawful discrimination
based upon creed, sex, race, or national origin. If AGENCIES find that any of
the provisions of this paragraph have been violated, such violation shall constitute
a material breach of this agreement upon which AGENCIES may determine to
cancel, terminate, or suspend the agreement. While AGENCIES reserve the right
to determine independently that the antidiscrimination provisions of the agreement
have been violated, in addition, a determination by the California Fair
Employment Practices Commission, or suece, ssor agency, or the Federal Equal
Employment Opportunity Commission, or successor agency, that CONSULTANT
has violated State or Federal antidiscrimination laws relative to this agreement
shall constitute a finding by AGENCIES that CONSULTANT has violated the
antidiscrimination provisions of this agreement.
Notices or correspondence relating to this agreement shall be in writing. Any
notices to be given hereunder shall be effective when personally delivered, or two
(2) days after placing in the United States Mail by certified mail, postage prepaid,
and addressed to the party to whom the notice is directed. The current addresses
of the parties are as follows:
AGENCIES
Assistant Director
Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG)
3737 Main Street, Suite 420
Riverside, CA 92501
CONSULTANT
R. Henry Mohle
Hank Mohle & Associates
901 East Imperial Highway, Suite A
La Habra, CA 90631
Work to be performed by CONSULTANT hereunder shall commence
immediately, and upon commencement of such work, CONSULTANT's right to
compensation therefor shall thereupon accrue.
CONSULTANT agrees that AGENCIES or any of their duly authorized
representatives shall at any reasonable time during regular business hours have
access to and the right to examine, audit, excerpt, copy, or transcribe any.
pertinent transaction, activity, time and work records, employment records, or
other records relating to this agreement. Such material, including all pertinent
cost accounting, financial records, and proprietary data, must be kept and
maintained by CONSULTANT for a period of at least four (4) years or for the
period required by law, whichever is greater, after completion of
CONSULTANT' s performance hereunder, unless AGENCIES' written permission
is given to dispose of same prior to that time.
Except as otherwise provided by law, all reports, communications, documents,
and information obtained or prepared by CONSULTANT in connection with its
work hereunder, shall not be published without prior consent of the Executive
Director, nor shall CONSULTANT issue any news releases or publish
information relating to its work hereunder without the prior consent of the
Executive Director.
The invalidity in whole or in part of any provision hereof shall not void or affect
the validity of any other provision.
O,
No waiver or breach of any provision hereof by either party shall constitute a
waiver of any other or future breach. Failure of either party to enforce any
provision hereof at any time or from time to time shall not be construed as a
waiver thereof.
This agreement is intended to be binding on the parties, and their respective
successors and assigns. The plural shall include the singular, and the singular
shall include the plural and neuter wherever the context so requires.
CONSULTANT will perform the services set out in this agreement, as
contemplated herein, in an efficient, timely, and professional manner and in
accordance with generally accepted standards for performing similar services. It
is understood that the AGENCIES, in entering into this agreement, are relying
on CONSULTANT' s representations for quality and professional work performed
in a timely manner, and CONSULTANT shall perform in accordance with those
representations and standards.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have accepted, made, and executed this
agreement upon the terms, conditions, and provisions above stated.
CONSULTANT: Hank Mohle & Associates
By:
R. Henry Mohle
President
AGENCIES:
City of Murrieta
Western Riverside Council of Governments
By: By:
Ben Minamide
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
A.J. Wilson
Executive Director
prop~alXtemecula'~thmoO!94.wpf 8
City of Temecula
By:
Ronald E. Bradley
City Manager
propotal~l~mecula~rhnmOI 94 .~pf
SW APD FOCUSED MODEL
SCOPE OF WORK
1,0 TAZ DEVELOPMENT
1.1 Realign Local TAZ's with Census
Geography
EXHIBIT A
SCOPE OF WORK
1.2 Develop Correspondence Tables
SW APD FOCUSED MODEL SCHEDULE
I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX
XXXX XXXX X
1.1.1 Adjust Local TAZ's to Census
Block Boundaries XXX
1.1.2 Adjust Local TAZ's to reflect 1990
and General Plan land use XX X
1.1.3 Provide maps for SCAG and local
agency review XX
1.1.4 Design centroid and centtold
connector system XXX
1.1.5 Provide WRCOG with TAZ Map in
· dxf format for conversion X
XXXX X
1 ·2.1 Use Polygon Overlay on Block ID's
to generate Table
1.2.2 Aggregate 1990 block data to
1.2.3 Add Geocoded data for 1990 -
1994 derived from permit data
XX
XX
X
LEAD AGENCY RESP, POSITION
HMA EJN
WRCOG/SCAG JWISBISS
2.0 NETWORK DEVELOPMENT
2.1 Road Network - Focused Area
XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX
XXXX XXXX XXX
2.1.1 Obtain Centerline coverage from
Riverside Co. I SCAG X
2.1.2 Clip Coverage to SW APD X
2.1.3 Select arcs for Model Network XX
2.1.4 Delete unnecessary arcs I nodes X
21.5 Add Centroid and Zone
Connectors XX
2.1.6 Edit CTP network near SW APD
Boundary to match focus area XX
2.1.7 Create Check Plots I ArcView
views for Review XX
2.1.8 Edit final network and convert to
TranPlan X XXX
2.2 Road Network - Outside Focused
Area
2.2.1 Generalize Zones outside focus
area XXXX
SCAG
Page I
SW APD FOCUSED MODEL
SCOPE OF WORK
2,2,2 Drop all zone connectors,
primary/secondary roads from
LA, OR,VEN
2.2.3 Add back new zone connectors to
LA, ORA, VEN
2.2.4 Combine networks and check in
TranPlan
2.2.5 Create Plots and ArcView views
for review
2.2.6 Edit network and test in TranPlan
23 Transit Network - Outside Focused
Area
2.3.1 Create transit network outside
focus area
2.3.2 Add transit zone connectors - walk
and Park-and-ride connectors
24 Transit Network - Focused Area
.2 Obtain transit networks from local
operators I TmnsStar (RTA/CTS)
2.4.3 Create focus area transit routes in
Arc/Info and TranPlan
2.4.4 Add transit zone connectors - walk
and Park-and-ride connectors
2.4.5 Merge and edit outside area and
focused area
2.4.5 Circulate maps / views for local
review
2.4.6 Make final edits
3,0 Network Attributes
3.1 Link Attributes
3.1.1 Create Maps/TableslArcView II
Views of focused Network
3.1.2 At Workshop in Southwest APD
distribute data and train staff
3.1.3 Local staff updates Link Attribute
data base
3.1.4 Create Check Plots and Review
3.1.5 Create Queq to transfer data to
,,_,.S. CAG in TranPlan format
.,2 Capital Improvements Plans
I(Altemative Future Networks
EXHIBIT A
SCOPE OF WORK
SW APD FOCUSED MODEL SCHEDULE
I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG
XXXX
XX
XX XXXX
XXXX
XX XXXX
XXXX XXXX
XXXX
XX XXXX
XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX
XXXX
XX XXXX
XXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXX
XXXX XXXX
XXXX
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX
XXXX XXXX XXXX
XXXX
XXXX
XXXX XXXX
XXXX
XXXX
LEAD AGENCY RESP, POSITION
WRCOGISCAG
JWISB
JW/VRPA
SS
JW
Page 2
SW APD FOCUSED MODEL
SCOPE OF WORK
3.2.1 Create Maps/Tables/ArcView II
Views with TIP / CIP data
3.2.2 At Workshop in Southwest APD
distribute data and train staff
3.2.3 Create Check Plots and Review
3.2.4 Create QueryNiew to output
network for appropriate alternative
3.2.5 Transfer data to SCAG
3.3 Monitoring Data
3.3.1 At Workshop ID key facilities that
need to be monitored for both CMP
3.3.2 At workshop, train staff to enter
data for attributes needed to calc LOS
3.3.3 Use spreadsheet/dBASE program
to calc LOS. Insert LOS in dBASE.
3.3.4 Create Query to transfer data to
RCTCISCAG
3.3.5 Establish schedule for annual
program
3.3.6 Create system for reviewing data in
Time Series.
4.0 Socioeconomic Data
4.1 1994 Base Year Data
EXHIBIT A
SCOPE OF WORK
'4.2 Future Year
SW APD FOCUSED MODEL SCHEDULE
I 2 3 4 5 6 7
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL
XXXX
XXXX
XXXX XXXX
XXXX XXXX X
XX
XX
XX
X
X
X
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX
XXXX XXXX
XXXX
4.1.1 Complete permit data Collection
through June 30 DONE
4.1.2 Test and select most effective
Geocoding methods XX
4.1.3 Geocode permits I assign x,y value
to each permit XX
4.1.4 Produce Maps/Tables/ArcView II
views for review X
4.1.5 Write Query to produce data in
CTP format / Transfer to SCAG X
4.1.6 Aggregate to CTP Zones and
Regional Zones X
XX XXXX XXXX
4.2.1 Acquire 93 LU and new GP
Coverages from AIS/SCAG XX XX
4.2.2 Create Development Constraints
Coverage to help design (TAZ's) XXXX
4.2.3 Create Woficshop Maps/Tables/
Views e.g. vacant land by GP LU XX
4.2.4 At workshop get input from
Planning Directors by block/taz X
8
AUG
LEAD AGENCY RESP. POSITION
JWNRPA
JWNRPA
SS
JWISS
, JW
WRCOGNRPA
WRCOG
JW/SBNRPA
JWNRPA
JWNRPA
JW
JWNRPA
JWNRPA
KR
KR/JWISS
KR
KR/JWPSS
KR/JW
KR/SS/JW
JWIKR
SS/RMIJW~-~
SS/RM/JW
JW/KR/VRPA
Page 3
SW APD FOCUSED MODEL
SCOPE OF WORK
4.2.5 Transmit information to Terry Bills
in appropriate format
4.2.6 Use SAAM or alternative procedure
to distribute data
4.2.7 Create review maps/tables/views
for members
4.2.8 Create Query to transmit data to
SCAG in CTP format
4.2.9 Aggregate data to CTP Zones and
Regional Zones
4.2.10 Develop alternative SED's ???
EXHIBIT A
SCOPE OF WORK
SW APD FOCUSED MODEL SCHEDULE
I 2 3 4
JAN FEB MAR APR
X
XX
X
X
X
NOT PLANNED
5 6 7 8
MAY JUN JUL AUG
LEAD AGENCY RESP, POSITION
KR/JW
JJIKR/JW/TB
KR/JW
KR/JW
SSIKR
5.0 VALIDATION / CALIBRATION
5.1 Trip Distribution
51.1 Obtain trip length data (from O&D
for SW RSA)
5.1.2 Compare trip length Statistics from
~ 3vity Model with O&D data
.3 Introduce K-factors, if needed, to
adjust gravity model
5.2 Mode Choice
5.2.1 Compare base model mode choice
output with survey data
5.2.2 Adjust mode choice model
parameters to reflect survey data
5.3 Trip Assignment
5.3.1 Collect a.m.p.m. peak-hour and
24-hour count data at key locations
5.3.2 Work with SCAG and local
agencies to identify screenline locations
5.3.3 Work with SCAG/WRCOG to
create ArcView views of monitoring data
and model data
5.3.4 Adjust model to bring base year
model in line with count data
5.3.5 Repeat 5.3.4 to achieve NCHRP
255 standards
5.3.6 Review validation results with
/~,SCAG I RCTC and local agencies
,,0 REFINEMENT OF VOLUMES
6.1 Link Volumes
X
X
XXXX XXXX XXXX
XX
X
X
XXX
X
X
XXXX XXXX
X
X
X
X
XXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXX
HMA/SCAG EJN
HMA EJN
Page 4
EXHIBIT A
SCOPE OF WORK
$W APD FOCUSED MODEL SCHEDULE
$W APD FOCUSED MODEL
SCOPE OF WORK
6.1.1 Compute delta between modeled
and counted volumes in dBASE
6.1.2 Apply delta to 2015 volumes to get
adjusted raw data
6.1.3 Convert Peak-Period volumes to
Peak-Hour volumes
I 2 3 4 5 6 7
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL
X
X
X
8
AUG
6.2 Intersection Volumes
X XXXX XXXX
6.2.1 Work with RCTC and local
agencies to identify key intersections
6.2.2 Collect base year peak-hour
turning movement data needed for LOS
6.2.3 Use NCHRP 255 to convert
modeled volumes to turning volumes
X
X
X
7.0 DEFICIENCY ANALYSIS
(Cities of Murrieta and Temecula
Planning Areas only.)
LEAD AGENCY RESP. POSITION
7.1 Segment Analysis
XXXX XXXX XXXX
7,1.1 Work with SCAG/RCTC to
identify critical segments
7.1.2 Build database necessary to
calculate LOS
7.1.3 Use AMLs (or an alternate
procedure) to calculate segment LOS
X
X HMA EJN
7.2 Intersection Analysis
X
7.2.1 Establish intertace between Arclnfo
and the HMA CAPSSI program
7.2.2 Work with WRCOG et al. to put
data for LOS calcs in monitoring
database
7.2.3 Compute peak-hour LOS at key
intersections
X XXXX XXXX
X
X
X
8.0 Alternatives Analysis ( optional )
9.0 MODEL REVIEW AND
EVALUATION
9.1 Evaluate Model on Ability to Meet
CMP and Local requirements
9.2 Compare Benefits and Costs with
Altematives
XXXX XX
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX
HMA/SCAG EJN
VRPA
Page 5
EXHIBIT C
SCHEDULE OF HOURLY RATES
EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 1995
Principal
Senior Civil Engineer (P.E.)
Senior Transportation Engineer (P.E.)
Construction Inspector
Systems Analyst
Transportation Engineer
Software Programmer
CADD Operator
Clerical
Expert Witness -- Principal (Deposition & Trial)
Subconsultants will be billed at cost plus 12%
$140.00
$110.00
$90.00
$75.00
$75.00
$60.00
$50.00
$45.00
$40.00
$250.00
Conditions of Usayee: The above rates are (vpicall. v effective for a 12-month period, but HMA maintains
the right to change the billing rates at an.v time for convenience of record keeping. Therefore, all billings
will always be at the then-current billing rates. This will not affect any agreed-upon total or not-to-
exceed fees.
INVOICES WILL BE SUBMITTED MONTHLY AND SHALL BE DUE AND
PAYABLE WITHIN 30 DAYS. A MONTHLY FINANCE CHARGE OF 1.5% SHALL
BE CHARGED ON UNPAID BALANCES.
genoff~resumasLrhmoO 194. doc
ITEM 10
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CTTY I~A~AGEI~ ~ \
'CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
Genie Roberrs, Finance Office~.
February 28, 1995
Review and Approval of the 21st Year FY 95-96 Community
Development Block Grant Applications
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Review and provide direction to staff as to the funding of projects for the 21 st Year FY
95-96 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program.
2. Authorize staff to forward the selected CDBG project applications to the Riverside
County Economic Development Agency (EDA).
DISCUSSION: The CDBG program is a federal grant program administered by the U.S.
Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) through which projects at the local
government level may be funded. This program is administered locally through the Riverside
County EDA.
The objectives of the CDBG program are to develop adequate housing, a suitable living
environment and increase economic opportunities in the community. In order to be considered
for funding, a CDBG grant application must meet one of the following national goals:
Low/moderate income persons ere primarily benefitted by the activity; or
The activity aids in the prevention or elimination of slums or blight; or
The activity meets an urgent (emergency) community development need.
A total of ten (10) applications for FY 95-96 funding were submitted to the City for
consideration. The funding requests total $258,186. The projects are listed in Attachment
A, which includes a brief description of each program.
The County of Riverside has informed the City that the funding allocation for FY 95-96 has
not been determined, however it is anticipated to be between ~200,000 and ~250,000.
Further, HUD specifies that not more than 1596 of the City's total allocation may be used for
projects within the category of public services. Given the range of the City's 21st year
anticipated CDBG allocation, the 15% available for public services projects will be between
$30,000 and $37,500. The funds remaining for other non-public service CDBG projects
would then be between el 70,000and $212,500. The County has also confirmed that there
is $45,527 carryover from the 20th year. This carryover may only be used for non-public
service projects.
The funding requests for Public Service projects total ~61,686. Except under certain
circumstances, County guidelines require that individual grant awards must be a minimum of
$10,000. The Finance Committee, Mayor Stone and Mayor Pro Tam Karel Lindemans,
reviewed all CDBG applications. After reviewing the Public Service applications, the Finance
Committee recommended funding of ~37,500, as outlined in Attachment A.
In addition to the Public Service funding requests, two non-Public Service applications were
submitted by the City. These projects total $196,500 and provide retrofitting to four existing
park sites to meet American Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements including play equipment
accessibility, picnicking accessibility and walkways with handicap access ramps and handicap
accessible public restrooms in Old Town Temecule.
The Finance Committee has recommended funding priorities which ere indicated on
Attachment A. If the City's total CDBG allocation does not provide for sufficient funding of
the non-Public Service projects, the City Council may wish to consider funding by priority.
FISCAL IMPACT: To the extent that CDBG funds are allocated to City projects, funds from
other City sources (i.e., General Fund, Community Services District) will not be required to be
allocated. The approval of CDBG funds for outside entities has no fiscal impact on the City
as these funds are received from an external funding source.
Attachment A
Project Summary
2
ATTACHMENT A
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT APPLICATIONS
FISCAL YEAR 95-96
PROJECT
CATEGORY
Public Service
Public Service
Public Service
Public Service
Public Service
Public Service
Public Service
Public Service
Public Facilities
Public Facilities
Public Facilities
Public Facilities
ORGANIZATION
Alternatives to Domestic
Violence
Assistance League of
Temecula Valley
Boys and Girls Club
St. Catherine Catholic
Church
Parent Center
Riverside County Dept of
Community Action
(DCA)
Senior Citizens Service
Center of the Temecula
Rancho Area, Inc.
Valley Intervention
Program for Tots (VIP
TOTS)
City of Temecula ADA
Park Project
City of Temecula ADA
Public Restroom Project
City of Temacula
Sam Hicks Monument
Park
City of Temecula
Sidewalk Handicap
Access Ramps
TOTAL
94-95 FUNDING FUNDING
FUNDING REQUEST RECMD'D
$10,000 $10,000 $2,500
$5,000 $10,000 $5,000
0 $10,697 $10,000
0 $10,000 0
0 $5,000 $5,000
0 $989 0
$10,000 ~10,000 $10,000
0 $5,000 $5,000
0 $161,500 $161,500
0 $35,000 $35,000
$179,521 0 0
$30,000 0 0
$234,521 $258,186 $234,000
PRIORITY
6
3
2
4
PROJECT SUMMARY
Name of Project: Altematives to Domestic Violence
Project Category: Public Service
Funding Requested: $10,000
Geographic Area to be Served: Countywide
Project Description: Funding is requested to continue serving victims of domestic violence and
their children. Services offered include counseling, information referral, 24 hour hctline, and
emergency shelters for victims of domestic violence. The Countywide 24-hour crisis line
responds to 13,000 calls per year. Approximately 1,600 of these calls come from the I-15
region which includes Temecula. Emergency shelter is provided to approximately 33
individuals from the Temecula region. The Program also provides 150 community education
presentations for increasing awareness of domestic violence and preventing domestic violence.
CDBG funding in the amount of $10,000 was approved for this project in the past two years.
Continued funding of this project will help sustain the present Crisis Line, Outreach and Shelter
service levels. This project qualifies for funding in accordance .with benefit to low and
moderate income persons.
Name of Project: Assistance League of Temecula Valley
Project Category: Public Service
Funding Requested: $10,000
Geographic Area to be Served: Temecula School District, Lake Bsinore School District, and
Murrieta School District.
Project Description: The project, known as Operation School Bell, provides clothing and
school supplies for needy school age children. A cost of ~85.00 is allocated to each child
served. Approximately 250 children will be served by this funding request, representing 120
families. Since September, 1993 Operation School Bell has clothed 257 children. Of these
130 have been from the Temecula School District. CDBG funding in the amount of ~5,000
was approved for this project in the past year. The project's documentation procedures to
verify service to low/moderate income persons were not fully implemented in the current year,
however, staff continues to seek compliance with these requirements.
Name of Project: Boys and Gids Club
Project Category: Public Service
Funding Requested: $10,697
Geographic Area to be Sewed: City of Temecula
Project Description: This proposed project addresses the needs for low income families and
through "A.M./P.M. Camp" which provides before and after school care, plus transportation
to and from all Temecula grammar and middle schools. The facility is open from 6:30 a.m.
to 6:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. The program coincides with the Track B schedule,
which is the largest percentage of children in school. The care will be provided for 354 school
age children from 1st through 8th grade. The program also offers "Power Hour", which is a -
homework assistance and tutoring program for the children. It also offers access to
computers for additional educational assistance through educational games.
Name of Project: St. Cathedne's Catholic Church
Project Category: Public Service
Funding Requested: $10,000
Geographic Area to be Served: Countywide
Project Description: This project provides emergency food, utility assistance and financial aide
for the needy. The program serves approx. 7,200 people per year. Funding is requested to
purchase food, provide utility assistance and pay for temporary lodging. Although income
information may be obtained from on-going clients, income verifications are not obtained from
one-time clients. Thus, there is no means of verifying that 51% of the clients are
low/moderate income individuals.
Name of Project: Parent Center
Project Category: Public Service
Funding Requested: $5,000
Geographic Area to be Served: Temecula
Project Description: The Parent Center's mission is to provide quality educational and personal
workshops, seminars, classes and support groups that will empower parents and assist them
in their efforts to build full-functioning families. Presently the Parent Center serves
approximately 500 parents and 200 children per month. To best maximize the Parent Center's
services, child care is available during workshops, classes and library use.
Name of Project: Riverside County Dept of Community Action (DCA)
Project Category: Public Service
Funding Requested: $989
Geographic Area to be Served: City of Temecula
Project Description: The Emergency Cold Weather Shelter Program (ECWSP), serving the
Temecula area, will open a life-saving shelter to homeless families and individuals from
November I through March 31 during periods of severe cold weather. The ECWSP in Hemet
provides 100 beds per night for the duration of the program. It is important to note that
ECWSP states that they never turn anyone away in need.
Name of Project: Senior Citizens Service Center of the Temecula Rancho Area, Inc.
Project Category: Public Service
Funding Requested: $10,000
Geographic Area to be Served: County-wide
Project Description: The program serves approximately 20,000 people per year within the
City's sphere of influence. Funding requested is to provide emergency food, utility assistance
and financial aide. CDBG funding in the amount of ~10,000 was approved for this project in
the current fiscal year. This project qualifies for funding in accordance with benefit to
low/moderate income persons. However, this organization may require staff assistance to
fully implement the required documentation to validate 51% service to low/moderate income
persons. Backup documentation from FY 94-95 is still outstanding.
Name of Project: Valley Intervention Program for Tots (VIP TOTS)
Project Category: Public Service
Funding Requested: aS,000
Geographic Area to be Served: Southwest Riverside County
Project Description: The Family Friends project coordinates senior citizen volunteers with
disabled/low income children and their families. This program collaborates with the Riverside
County Office on Aging to provide practical assistance to meet the demands of daily living
with a disabled or chronically ill child. The volunteer spends a few hours each week with the
children in their home, reading to a sibling, accompany a mother and child to medical
appointment, or be a good listener to an overworked, stressed parent.
Name of Project: City of Temecula - American Disabilities Act Park Rehabilitation Project
Project Category: Public Facilities
Funding Requested: $161,500
Geographic Area to be Sewed: City-wide
Project Description: This project will rehabilitate four existing City parks (Veteran's Park, Calla
Aragon Park, John Magee Park and Rancho California Sports Park) to meet American
Disabilities Act standards for handicap access to park amenities.
Name of Project: City of Temecula -Amedcan Disabilities Act Public Restroom Project
Project Category: Public Facilities
Funding Requested: $35,000
Geographic Area to be Served: City-wide
Project Description: This project will fund the acquisition of a portable handicap restroom
facility for Old Town Temecula that meets ADA requirements that are located in the
Redevelopment Area. Additionally, funds would be used to design and construct a western
facade so the facility will be compatible with Old Town. The funds will also be used to extend
a water hook-up to the facility.
ITEM 11
CITY MANAGER~
TO'-
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Joseph Kicak, Interim Director of Public Works\City Engineer
February 28, 1995
Professional Services for the Design of an Interim Traffic Signal for the ..
Intersection of State Route 79(S) with Margarita Road/Redhawk Parkway, Pala
Road and La Paz Street
PREPARED BY:
Martin C. Lauber, Traffic Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council approve Professional Services Agreements for the design of an interim
traffic signal for the intersections of State Route 79(S):
1. Margarita Road/Redhawk Parkway BRW, Inc. $5,474.00
2. Pala Road Albert Grover & Assoc. $5,230.00
3. La Paz Street Transtech $5,065.00
BACKGROUND:
The City of Temacula has received approval for $109,200 for the construction of an interim
traffic signal at State Route 79(S) and Margarita Road/Redhawk Parkway. The funding was
allocated through the Riverside County STP Formula Funds Program.
The intersection of State Route 79(S) and Margarita Road/Redhawk Parkway is currently
controlled by an all-way stop configuration. Three of the four roadway approaches are
constructed at their ultimate width. The east side of Margarita Road, north of SR 79 (S) is the
only side requiring future construction improvements to allow two northbound departure lanes.
The interim traffic signal plan will be designed to fit ultimate conditions with only minor future
alterations required.
Assessment District 159 plans to incorporate the ultimate traffic signal construction into final
roadway improvements. The timing of these improvements is uncertain due to the many
variables controlling project financing.
Staff has prepared Requests For Proposals (RFP) for Professional Engineering Services for the
preparation of plans, specifications and estimates for all three (3) interim traffic signal
improvements. Staff reviewed proposals from ten (10) firms.
r:.~agdrpt%gb'~022~trafig.h791atl~
All firms are required to submit plans for City review twenty (20) working days after awarding
the contract. The final construction documents should be ready for construction
approximately two (2) months after the Notice to Proceed.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The total design cost for all interim traffic signals as listed in the recommendation is $15,769.
Funds are available in Development Impact Fees/Traffic Signal Mitigation Account No. 210-
165-645-5802.
Attachment:
Agreements: BRW, Inc.
Albert Grover & Assoc.
Transtech
r.~gdrl~95%O228%trafeig .h791aip
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
This Agreement was made and entered into this 28th day of February, 1995, by and
between the City of Temecula ("City"), a municipal corporation, and BRW, Inc., a California
Corporation ("Consultant").
The parties her·to mutually agree as follows:
Services. Consultant shall perform the tasks set forth in Exhibit "A" attached
her·to. Consultant shall complete the tasks according to the schedule set forth in
Exhibit "A".
Performance. Consultant shall st all times, faithfully, industrially and to the best of
his ability, experience and talent, perform all tasks described herein.
e
Payment. The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, at the hourly rates set forth
in Exhibit "B" attached her·to, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks.
This amount will not exceed $5,474.00 for the total term of the Agreement unless
additional payment is approved by the City Council; orovided that the City Manager
may approve additional payment not to exceed ten percent (10%) of the
Agreement; but in no event more than $10,000.00.
Consultant will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed. Invoices
shall be submitted on or about the first business day of each month, for services
provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of
receipt of each invoice.
Amendments. This Agreement may be amended so long as such amendment is in
writing and agreed upon by both the City Council and Consultant.
Ownership of Documents. Upon satisfactory completion of or in the event of
termination, suspension or abandonment of this Agreement, all original documents,
designs, drawings, and notes prepared in the course of providing the services to be
performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City
and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the City without the
permission of the Consultant.
Termination. The City may terminate this Agreement without cause so long as
written notice of intent to terminate is given to Consultant at least three (3) days
prior to the termination date. In the event of termination, Consultant shall be paid
for the services performed.
Indemnification. The Consultant agrees to indemnify and save harmless the City,
its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from end against any and all claims,
demands, losses, defense cost, or liability of any kind or nature which the City, its
officers, agents and employees may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon
them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of
Consultant's acts or omissions under the terms of this Agreement, excepting only
liability arising out of the sole negligence of the City.
- 1 - r:%rfp%O34%brw.egrlajp
10.
11.
Status of Consultant. Consdtant is an independent contractor in all respects in the
performance of this Agreement and shall not be considered an employee of the City
for any purpose. No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in
connection with the performance of this Agreement.
Except as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other
compensation to Consultant for performing services hereunder for City. City shall
not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Consultant for injury or sickness
arising out of performing services hereunder.
Term. This Agreement shall commence on February 28, 1995, and shall remain and
continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later
than February 28, 1996.
nefs,~t. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under the terms of this -.
Agreement, the City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating
Consultant for any work performed after the date of default. Default shall include
not performing the tasks described herein to the reasonable satisfaction of the City
Manager of the City. Failure by the Consultant to make progress in the performance
of work hereunder, if such failure arises out of causes beyond his control, and
without fault or negligence of the Consultant, shall not be considered a default.
Any disputes regarding performance, default or other matters in dispute between
the City and the Consultant arising out of this Agreement or breech thereof, shall
be resolved by arbitration. The arbitrator's decision shall be final.
Consultant shall select an arbitrator from a list provided by the City of three retired
judges of the Judicial Arbitration end Mediation Services, Inc. The arbitration
hearing shall be conducted according to California Code of Civil Procedure Section
1280, 9t sea. City and Consultant shall share the cost of the arbitration equally.
Notices. Notices shall be given pursuant to this Agreement by personal service on
the party to be notified, or by written notice .upon such party deposited in the
custody of the United States Postal Service addressed as follows:
City:
Attention: City Manager
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
be
Consultant:
BRW, Inc.
620 C Street, Suite 300
San Diego, California 92101
The notices shall be deemed to have been given as of the date of personal service,
or three (3) days after the date of deposit of the same in the custody of the United
States Postal Service.
-2- r:\rfp%O34%brw.agrlajP
12.
Entire Aoreement. This Agreement and any documents or instrument attached
hereto or referred to herein integrate all terms and conditions mentioned herein or
incidental hereto supersede all negotiations and prior writing in respect to the
subject matter hereof.
In the event of conflict between the terms, conditions, or provisions of this
Agreement end any such document or instrument, the terms and conditions of this
Agreement shall prevail.
13.
Liability. Except as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages,
or other compensation to Consultant for performing services hereunder for City.
City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Consultant for injury
or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder.
Consultant agrees to indemnify, release and hold harmless the City, its officers,,
agents, employees, and representatives for all claims or losses the City may suffer
resulting from any negligent actions or omissions by Consultant.
Consultant shell secure workers' compensation insurance. Upon request of
Consultant, the City shall add Consultant to the City's workers' compensation
policy and the Consultant shall reimburse the City for the cost of said insurance
premiums. :
14.
Licenses. Consultant and subconsultant shall obtain all necessary licenses,
including but not limited to, City Business Licenses.
The parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date and year above
written.
CONSULTANT
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
By
Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
-3- r:~rfp~034~brw .agrlejp
EXHIBIT "A"
TASKS TO BE PERFORMED
INTERIM TRAFFIC SIGNAL
State Route 79 (S) at Margarita Road/Redhawk Parkway
Prepare a detailed list of the items of work to be performed by the consultant.
Conduct an investigation to confirm existing roadway geometrics and utility locations.
Prepare an Interim Traffic Signal plan, with Cover Sheet, on City title block sheets
which will accommodate future modifications required to match the ultimate
improvement to be constructed by County Assessment District 159. The roadway
improvement plans for the ultimate configurations will be provided·
Prepare a Signing and Striping plan to accommodate interim Traffic Signal. All plans will
need to be prepared on electronic media compatible with standard AutoCAD software.
Submit the project packet to the City of Temecula, Traffic Division, for review prior to
initial submittal to CALTRANS.
Submit to Caltrans for review and approval.
Respond to CALTRANS plan check comments in order to receive project approval.
Obtain a County of Riverside Cooperative Agreement, CALTRANS Cooperative
Maintenance Agreement and a Caitrans Encroachment Permit·
r:\ffp%034\grover.agrlajp
EXHIBIT "B"
PAYMENT SCHEDULE
HOURLY RATES FOR BRW/TRANSPORTATION GROUP
BY EMPLOYEE CLASSIFICATION
AFRIL 1, 19oA
CLASSIFICATION
HOURLY RATE
Principal $120.00
Vice President 115,00
Se~oz Associate 100.00
Associate 95.00
Seni~ Consu/tant 80.00
Consultant I 50.00
Staff Level V 6Z50
5t~ff I_~v~l I 27.50
r:%rlp%O34~.grover.mgr/ajp
PROFESSIONAL SERVIC;:S
This Agreement was made and entered into this 28th day of February, 1995, by and
between the City of Temecula ("City"), a municipal corporation, and Albert Grover and
Associates, an individual ('Consultant').
The parties hereto mutually agree as follows:
Services. Consultant shall perform the tasks set forth in Exhibit "A" attached
hereto. Cormultant shall complete the tasks according to the schedule set forth in
Exhibit 'A".
Performance. Consultant shall at all times, faithfully, industrially and to the best of
his ability, experience and talent, perform all tasks described herein.
8
Payment. The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, at the hourly rates set forth
in Exhibit "B" attached hereto, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks.
This amount will not exceed $5,230.00 for the total term of the Agreement unless
additional payment is approved by the City Council; provided that the City Manager
may approve additional payment not to exceed ten percent (10%) of the
Agreement; but in no event more than $10,000.00.
Consultant will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed. Invoices
shall be submitted on or about the first business day of each month, for services
provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of
receipt of each invoice.
Amendments. This Agreement may be amended so long as such amendment is in
writing and agreed upon by both the City Council and Consultant.
8
OwnersNo of Documents. Upon satisfactory completion of or in the event of
termination, suspension or abandonment of this Agreement, all original documents,
designs, drawings, and notes prepared in the course of providing the services to be
performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City
and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the City without the
permission of the Consultant.
Termination. The City may terminate this Agreement without cause so long as
written notice of intent to terminate is given to Consultant at least three (3) days
prior to the termination date. In the event of termination, Consultant shall be paid
for the services performed.
Indemnificaffi)n. The Consultant agrees to indemnify and save harmless the City,
its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims,
demands, losses, defense cost, or liability of any kind or nature which the City, its
officers, agents and employees may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon
them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of
Consultant's acts or omissions under the terms of this Agreement, excepting only
liability arising out of the sole negligence of the City.
-1 ' r:'trfp'tO35%grover.egrlajp
10.
11.
Status of Consultant. Consultant is an independent contractor in all respects in the
performance of this Agreement and shall not be considered an employee of the City
for any purpose. No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in
connection with the performance of this Agreement.
Except as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other
compensation to Consultant for performing services hereunder for City. City shall
not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Consultant for injury or sickness
arising out of performing services hereunder.
Term. This Agreement shell commence on February 28, 1995, and shall remain and
continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later
than February 28.1996.
I:)efe,at. In the event that Cortsultant is in default for cause under the terms of this -
Agreement, the City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating
Consultant for any work performed after the date of default. Default shall include
not performing the tasks described herein to the reasonable satisfaction of the City
Manager of the City. Failure by the Consultant to make progress in the performance
of work hereunder, if such failure arises out of causes beyond his control, end
without fault or negligence of the Consultant, shall not be considered a default.
Any disputes regarding performance, default or other matters in dispute between
the City and the Consultant arising out of this Agreement or breech thereof, shall
be resolved by arbitration. The arbitrator's decision shall be final.
Consultant shall select an arbitrator from a list provided by the City of three retired
judges of the Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services, Inc. The arbitration
hearing shall be conducted according to California Code of Civil Procedure Section
1280, etHo. City and Consultant shall share the cost of the arbitration equally.
Notices. Notices shall be given pursuant to this Agreement by personal service on
the party to be notified, or by written notice upon such party deposited in the
custody of the United States Postal Service addressed as follows:
City:
Attention: City Manager
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
bo
Consultant:
Albert Grover and Associates
211 East Imperial Highway, Suite 208
Fullerton, California 92635
The notices shell be deemed to have been given as of the date of personal service,
or three (3) days after the date of deposit of the same in the custody of the United
States Postal Service.
-2- r:\rfp%035~,grover.eOrlajP
12.
13.
Entire Aereement. This Agreement and any documents or instrument attached
hereto or referred to herein integrate all terms and conditions mentioned herein or
incidental hereto supersede all negotiations and prior writing in respect to the
subject matter hereof.
In the event of conflict between the terms, conditions, or provisions of this
Agreement and any such document or instrument, the terms and conditions of this
Agreement shall prevail.
Liabiliw. Except as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages,
or other compensation to Consultant for performing services hereunder for City.
City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Consultant for injury
or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder.
Consultant agrees to indemnify, release and hold harmless the City, its officers, -
agents, employees, and representatives for all claims or losses the City may suffer
resulting from any negligent actions or omissions by Consultant.
Consultant shall secure workers' compensation insurance. Upon request of
Consultant, the City shall add Consultant to the City's workers' compensation
policy and the Consultant shall reimburse the City for the cost of said insurance
premiums.
14.
Licenses. Consultant and subconsultant shall obtain all necessary licenses,
including but not limited to, City Business Licenses.
The parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date and year above
written.
CONSULTANT
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
By
Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
-3- r:%rfp%O35~grover.egrlejp
FXHIBIT "A"
TASKS TO BE PERFORMED
INTERIM TRAFFIC SIGNAL
State Route 79{S) at Pala Road
Prepare a detailed list of the items of work to be performed by the consultant.
Conduct an investigation to confirm existing roadway geometrics and utility
locations.
Prepare an Interim Traffic Signal plan, Project Cover Sheet, on City title block.
The roadway improvement plans for the ultimate configurations will be
available.
Prepare a Signing and Striping plan to accommodate for the interim Traffic
Signal. All plans will need to be prepared on electronic media compatible with
AutoCAD, Series 12, software.
Prepare a construction cost estimate for implementing your traffic signal and
striping and signing plans.
Submit the project packet to the City of Temecula, Traffic Division, for review
prior to initial submittal to CALTRANS.
Respond to all CALTRANS plan check comments.
Prepare all documents required for a Caltrans Encroachment Permit submittal.
r:~rfp~034\grover .agrlejp
EXHIBIT "B"
PAYMENT SCHEDULE
ALBERT
SCHEDULE OF HOURLY RATES
EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 1993
Principal
Associate
Vice president/Senior Engineer
Director of Project Development
Senior Design Engineer
Senior Transportation Engineer
Resident Engineer
Design Engineer
Transportation Engineer
Construction Inspector
Assistant Engineer
Designer
Assistant Transportation Engineer
Systems Analyst
Senior CADD Operator
Engineering Technician H
CADD Operator
Clerical/Engineering Technician I
Traffic Enumerator/Engineering Aide
Expert Wimess - Principal
Expert Wimess - Vice President
Subcomultants will be billed at cost plus 12%
$ 140.00
$ 110.00
$ I10.00
$ I10.00
$ 100.00
$ 90.00
$ 90.00
$ 85.00
$ 80.00
$ 75.00
$ 75.00
$ 60.00
$ 5S.00
$ 50.00
$ 45.OO
$ 45.00
$ 40.00
$ 4O.OO
$ 35.00
$ 200.00
$ 150.00
Att~dance at Evening (6:00 p.m. or later) Meeting, Hearings, ~c. will b~ billed at 150% of the hourly ate.
Conditions of Usaee: Iht above rates are typically effective for a 12 month period, bat AGA mainatin.v the ritht
W change the billing rates at any time for convenience of record ktepin8. Therefore, all billings will aiwayz be at
the then current billing rates. This will not affect any agreed upon total or not-to-acted fees.
INVOICES WILL BE SUBMri-i b.D MONTHLY AND SHALL BE DUE AND pAYABLE WrrHIN ~0 DAYS.
FINANCE CHARGES WILL BE ACCRUED DAILY ON UNPAID BALANCES BASED ON A 10% ANNUAL
PERCENTAGE RATE.
r:\rfp%O34\Orover.eclr/ejO
PROFFSSIONAL SFRVICFS
This Agreement was made and entered into this 28th day of February, 1995, by and
between the City of Temecula ("City"), a municipal corporation, and Transtech, a California
Corporation ("Consultant*).
The parties hereto mutually agree as follows:
Services. Consultant shall parform the tasks set forth in Exhibit "A" attached
hereto. Consultant shall complete the tasks according to the schedule set forth in
Exhibit "A".
Performance. Consultant shall at all times, faithfully, industrially and to the best of
his ability, experience and talent, parform all tasks described herein.
Payment. The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, at the hourly rates set forth
in Exhibit "B" attached hereto, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks.
This amount will not exceed $ 5,065.00 for the total term of the Agreement unless
additional payment is approved by the City Council; I)rovided that the City Manager
may approve additional payment not to exceed ten percent (10%) of the
Agreement; but in no event more than ~10,000.00.
Consultant will submit invoices monthly for actual services parformed. Invoices
shall be submitted on or about the first business day of each month, for services
provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of
receipt of each invoice.
Amendments. This Agreement may be amended so long as such amendment is in
writing and agreed upon by both the City Council and Consultant.
e
Ownsr~hio of Documents. Upon satisfactory completion of or in the event of
termination, suspension or abandonment of this Agreement, all original documents,
designs, drawings, and notes prepared in the course of providing the services to be
parformed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City
and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the City without the
permission of the Consultant.
Termination, The City may terminate this Agreement without cause so long as
written notice of intent to terminate is given to Consultant at least three (3) days
prior to the termination date. In the event of termination, Consultant shall be paid
for the services performed.
Indemnification. The Consultant agrees to indemnify and save harmless the City,
its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims,
demands, losses, defense cost, or liability of any kind or nature which the City, its
officers, agents and employees may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon
them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of
Consultant'a acts or omissions under the terms of this Agreement, excepting only
liability arising out of the sole negligence of the City.
-1 - r:~rfp%O36%transteo.agrl,,jp
10.
11.
Status of Consultant. Consultant is an independent contractor in all respects in the
performance of this Agreement and shall not be considered an employee of the City
for any purpose. No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in
connection with the performance of this Agreement.
Except as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other
compensation to Consultant for performing services hereunder for City, City shall
not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Consultant for injury or sickness
arising out of performing services hereunder.
Term. This Agreement shall commence on February 28, 1995, and shall remain and
continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later
than February 28, 1996.
Default. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under the terms of this-
Agreement, the City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating
Consultant for any work performed after the date of default. Default shall include
not performing the tasks described herein to the reasonable satisfaction of the City
Manager of the City. Failure by the Consultant to make progress in the performance
of work hereunder, if such failure arises out of causes beyond his control, and
without fault or negligence of the Consultant, shall not be considered a default.
Any disputes regarding performance, default or other matters in dispute between
the City and the Consultant arising out of this Agreement or breech thereof, shall
be resolved by arbitration. The arbitrator's decision shall be final.
Consultant shall select an arbitrator from a list provided by the City of three retired
judges of the Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services, Inc. The arbitration
hearing shall be conducted according to California Code of Civil Procedure Section
1280, et sea. City and Consultant shall share the cost of the arbitration equally.
Notices. Notices shall be given pursuant to this Agreement by personal service on
the party to be notified, or by written notice upon such party deposited in the
custody of the United States Postal Service addressed as follows:
City:
Attention: City Manager
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
Consultant:
Transtech
555 South Rancho Santa Fe Road, Suite 202
San Marcos, California 92069
The notices shall be deemed to have been given as of the date of personal service,
or three (3) days after the date of deposit of the same in the custody of the United
States Postal Service.
-2- r:%rfp\036\transtec .agrlajp
12.
Entire Aoreement. This Agreement and any documents or instrument attached
hereto or referred to herein integrate all terms and conditions mentioned herein or
incidental hereto supersede all negotiations and prior writing in respect to the
subject matter hereof.
In the event of conflict between the terms, conditions, or provisions of this
Agreement and any such document or instrument, the terms and conditions of this
Agreement shall prevail.
13.
LiabiliW. Except as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages,
or other compensation to Consultant for performing services hereunder for City.
City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Consultant for injury
or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder.
Consultant agrees to indemnify, release and hold harmless the City, its officers,..
agents, employees, and representatives for all claims or losses the City may suffer
resulting from any negligent actions or omissions by Consultant.
14.
Consultant shall secure workers' compensation insurance. Upon request of
Consultant, the City shall add Consultant to the City's workers' compensation
policy and the Consultant shall reimburse the City for the cost of said insurance
premiums.
Licenses. Consultant and subconsultant shall obtain all necessary licenses,
including but not limited to, City Business Licenses.
The parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date and year above
written,
CONSULTANT
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
By
Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
-3- r:%rfp%036%transtec .egrlajp
EXHIBIT "A"
TASKS TO BE PERFORMED
INTERIM TRAFFIC SIGNAL
State Route 79(S) at La Paz Street
2.
3.
4.
Prepare a detailed list of the items of work to be performed by the consultant.
Conduct an investigation to confirm existing roadway geometrics and utility locations.
Prepare an Interim Traffic Signal plan, Project Cover Sheet, on City title block.
Prepare a Signing and Striping plan to accommodate for the interim Traffic Signal. All
plans will need to be prepared on electronic media compatible with AutoCAD, Version
12, software.
Prepare a construction cost estimate for implementing your traffic signal and striping
& signing plans.
Submit the project packet to the City of Temecula, Traffic Division, for review prior to
initial submittal to CALTRANS.
Respond to all CALTRANS and City of Temecula plan check comments.
Prepare all documents required for a Caltrans Encroachment Permit submittal.
r:%rfp~O34'~grover.agrlejP
EXHIBIT "B"
PAYMENT SCHEDULE
Billing Rate Schedule
C~'AsStFIrATION
PRO~F, CT MANAGEIt
PROJECT BNGINEER
~ENIOR ENGLNF, ER
TRANSPORTATtONICIVIL BNGINEER
SEN~OR D~IGN ENGINBI~'R
DESIGN BNGINEER
TRANSPORTATION ANALYST
SENIOR DESIGNBR
INSPECFOR
CADD DRAFTER
DESIGNER
DRAFrB~GX~G TECIaN~CIAN
CLERICAL
ltOURt. Y RAT~
$90.00
S80.00
$70.00
$60.00
$70.00
$60.00
$SS .00
$5:5.00
$50.00
S50.00
$45,00
$40.00
S35.00
Reimtmrsables for deliveries, printing, reproduction, copying and duplicating shall be at cost plus ten (10)
percent. Coordination and administration of subcontracted servic=s will be at a ten (10) percent fee.
Travel costs ate charged at local prevailing rates.
r:%rfp%O34%grover.egrlajp
ITEM
12
APPROVAL E~
CITYATtORNEY
FINANCE OFFI
CITY MANAG
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Council
Mary Jane McLarney, Assistant City Manager
:;
February 28, 1995
Temecula Community Partnership
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 95-._
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA TO
ADOPT AND SUPPORT THE PREVENTION GOALS OF THE TEMECULA
COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP.
BACKGROUND:
The Temecula Community Partnership is a coalition of both public and private organizations
within the Temecula Community joining in the effort to promote the development of Iong-
range, comprehensive, community-wide drug use and alcohol abuse prevention planning and
program development. To increase Community awareness of drug abuse and prevention, the
following programs have been implemented:
Community Forums on Drugs and Youth
Neighborhoods In Action Parent Education Trainings
Community Resource Directory
Designated Driver Button Program
Reading Buddies Volunteer Program
Licensee Education on Alcohol and Drugs
Prevention Expo (in conjunction with the Temecula Valley Friendship Games)
Drug-Free Workplace Program
McGruff Truck Child Safety Program
Resource Library (videos, pamphlets and materials)
The Temecula Community Partnership has asked that the City adopt the attached resolution
in support of the program. In addition, the Assistant City Manager and Police Chief for the
City serve on the Board of Directors for the Community Partnership.
R:~JLNIEN)A'~TAFFO.M]S
The City is a designated drug-free workplace and has a substance abuse and prevention
program. In addition, an Employee Assistance Program (EAP) is offered to provide assistance
to employees and their families if the need arises.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
R:~AN~DA~TAR:6.M~ ~
RESOLUTION NO. 9~._
A RESOLIH'ION OF THE C1TY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECUIA TO ADOFF AND SlIPPORT ~
PREVENTION GOALS OF THE TEVIECULA CO~
PARTNERSHIP.
Wm~F~&S, the City of Temecula hereby resolves to support the following prevention
goals of the Temecula Community Partnership;
1.
2.
3. Increase the re~i_'llency and protr, ctive factors with youth and with families and
communities to reduce the use of alcohol and other drugs.
4. Coordinate and integrate community-wide agencies into a comprehensive,
multilevel program.
5. Increase the availability and accessib~ of prevention services for youth.
6. Implement, evaluate, and disseminate a *Uansponable model" program that other
communitie~ can' adopt/adapt to praytat abuse of alcohol and other drugs.
WHERe&S, the City Of Temecula further resolves to support the accomplishment of the
aforementioned goals through participation in the prevention planning and program development
activities;
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
federal dollars cease.
6. Encourage employees to participate in Parmership activities and trainings.
Decrease the use of alcohol and other drugs by youth and adults.
Reduce the risk factors for using alcohol and other drugs in the individual andTM
Disseminate information about Partnership activities.
Attend semi-annual coalition meetings.
Serve on family, school or community phnning committees.
Implement a. Drag-Free Workplace policy/program.
Help develop a self-sustaining funding program to continue project initiatives once
PASSI~, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of February, 1995.
Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk, CMC
STATE OF CAIXFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE)SS
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula DO I:r~]gRy CERTIFY that the
foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular
meeting thereof, held on the
wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
day of February, 1995 by the following vote, to
COUNTERS:
COUNTERS:
COUNCK34~MBERS:
June S. Greek, City Clerk, CMC
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMFLULA TO ADOPT AND 8UI'PORT THE
PREVENTION GOALS OF THE TIi~!ECULA COMMUNITY
PAR~.
W!n~REAS, the City of Temecula hereby resolves to support the following prevention
goals of the Temecula Community Partnership;
1. Decrease the use of alcohol and other drugs by youth and adults.
2. Reduce the risk factors for ~ng alcohol and other drugs in the individual and '.
environment.
3. Increase the resiliency and protective factors with youth and with families and
communities to reduce the use of alcohol and other drugs.
4. Coordinate and integrate community-wide agencies inW a comprehensive,
multilevel program.
5. Increase the availability and accessibility of prevention services for youth.
6. Implement, evaluate, and disseminate a "transportable model" program that other
communities can adopt/adapt to prevent abuse of alcohol and other drugs.
WBEB.EA$, the City of Temecula further resolves to support the accomplishment of the
aforementioned goals through participation in the prevention pls~nning and program dev~opment
activities;
1. Disseminate information about Parmership activities.
2. Attend semi-annual coalition meetings.
3. Serve on family, school or community planning committees.
4. Implement a Drug-Free Workplace policy/program.
5. Help develop a self-sust3_ining funding program to continue project initiatives once
federal dollars cease.
6. Encourage employees to participate in Partnership activities and trainings.
Section 1. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVEB AND ADOFrED by the City Council of the City of Temecula
at a regular meeting held on the day of February, 1995.
Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk, CMC
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE)SS
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula DO ~Ry CERTIFY that the
foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular
meeting thereof, held on the
wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
day of February, 199S by the following vote, to
COUNC~ERS:
COUNC~ERS:
COUNCu-MEMBERS:
June S. Greek, City Clerk, CMC
ITEM
13
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROV
CITY ATTORNEY~
FINANCE OFFICE
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning
February 28, 1995
Planning Application No. PA94-0062, Pulte Home Corp.
Prepared By:
Saied Naaseh, Associate Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council:
1. Read by title only and introduce an Ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 95-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 213, AMENDMENT NO. 2 (PA94-0062);
AMENDING SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 213 TO CHANGE THE ZONING FOR
PLANNING AREA 11 (32 ACRES) FROM VERY HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
(14-20 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE WITH A MAXIMUM OF 360 MULTI-
FAMILY DWELLINGS) TO MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL {2-5 DWELLING
UNITS PER ACRE 'WITH A MAXIMUM OF 150 SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS),
LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF TOWN VIEW AVENUE AND
MURRIETA HOT SPRINGS ROAD.
BACKGROUND
The proposed project is an amendment to Specific Plan No. 213. This amendment eliminates
360 multi-family units in Planning Area 11, replaces them with 150 single family dwellings,
and sets the Zoning and Development Standards to develop these houses. This amendment
pre-zones Planning Area 11 which may be annexed to the City at a later date. Since Planning
Area 11 is not contiguous to the City Limits, more property within the Silver Hawk Specific
Plan needs to be annexed to the City with the annexation of this Planning Area.
The Planning Commission recommended approval of this item to the City Council at their
January 23, 1995 meeting with a 4-1 vote with Commissioner Blair casting the dissenting
vote. All Commissioners were in support of the project; however, Commissioner Blair was not
in favor of deleting Condition No. 13 that required the developer to reach an agreement with
the School District prior to effectiveness of the Specific Plan.
R:\STAFFRPT\62PA94.CC 2/21/95 ktb 1
DISCUSSION
The Planning Commission had questions regarding how this project will impact the City's
Housing Element, the Quimby Fees the project is required to pay, the side yard setbacks, the
minimum lot sizes, the proposed zoning designation, and school mitigation.
Staff provided the following explanations to the Commission's questions:
· The project will not impact the Housing Element; however, future down zoning from
multi-family to single family residences may have impacts on the Housing Element.
The project will pay Quimby Fees consistent with the City's Quimby Fee Ordinance (5
acres per 1000) similar to the County standard at 'the time of the initial project
approval.
The side yard setbacks for the project are not to be less than 10 percent of the width
of the lot. In no case shall the setback is less than three (3) feet and it need not
exceed 5 feet. Encroachment to the side yards may be allowed consistent with the
Specific Ran Zoning Standards.
The proposed zoning designation for Planning Area 11 was Low Medium Density
Residential with a range of 4-7 dwelling units per acre and a target density of 4.7
dwelling units per acre. This proposed designation caused some confusion among the
Commissioners; therefore, Staff has recommended to change this designation to
Medium Density Residential with a range of 2-5 dwelling units per acre and a target
density of 4.7 dwelling units per acre. This designation will not change the merits of
project and still limits the number of dwelling units to 150.
The Specific Plan was originally approved by the County with a condition to mitigate
school impacts by reaching an agreement with the School District at the time of
reviewing the tract maps. In light of the approval of the School Mitigation Resolution
by the Planning Commission, Staff recommended Condition No. 13 to the Planning
Commission. Condition No. 13 reads as follows:
Approval of the Silver Hawk Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 is
contingent upon and shall not become effective, nor shall it vest,
until the applicant has reached and recorded a binding mitigation
agreement with the Temecula Valley Unified School District to
ensure the mitigation of the new students generated by this
project if the City Council adopts the School Mitigation
Resolution as recommended for approval by the .Planning
Commission. Refer to the Temecula Valley Unified School
District letter dated January 13, 1995.
At the Planning Commission hearing the applicant requested deleting the Condition
since there are provisions that make this project exempt for the Resolution, The
Assistant City Attorney recommended deleting Condition No. 13 since the originally
approved Condition of Approval by the County which requires the applicant to mitigate
the impacts to the School District at the development application stage in accordance
R:\STAFFRPT\62PAg/,,CC 2/21/95 ktb 2
with the District policies in effect at the time of tract submittal still applies to the
project.
Commissioner Blair opposed deleting Condition No. 13 since the City Council had not
taken an action on the Resolution and deleting the Condition would be premature as
the final form of the Resolution was not known.
FISCAL IMPACT
A Fiscal Impacts Analysis will be provided for City Council review with the Annexation
application.
Attachments:
Ordinance No. 95- - Page 4
Exhibit A of Ordinance No. 95-' (Conditions of Approval) - Page 8
Planning Commission Staff Report, January 23, 1995 - Page 13
R:\STAFFRPT\6?.PAg/,.CC 2/21/95 ktb 3
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
ORDINANCE NO. 95-
R:\STAFFRPT\62PAgA..CC 2/21/95 ktb 4
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
ORDINANCE NO. 95-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE C1TY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING SPF. C~IC PlAN NO. 213, AMENDMENT NO.
2 ~G APPLICATION NO. 94-4)62) AMENDING SPECIHC PLAN
NO. 213 TO CHANGE THE ZONING FOR PLANNING AREA 11 (32
ACRF_S) FROM VERY HIGHDENS1TY RESIDENTIAL (14-20 DWrJJJNG
UNITS PER ACRE WITH A MAXiMUIVI OF 360 MULTI- FAlVHLY
DW~JJJNGS) TO MEnRIM DENSITY RESID~ (25 DWELLING
UNITS FER ACRE WITH A ~ OF lS0 SINGLE FAMilY
DW~-LL~NGS), LOCATEB ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF TOWN
VIEW AVENUE AND MURB~A HOT SPRINGS ROAD.
WiP~REAS, Pulte Home Corp. filed PA94-0062 in accordance with the Riverside
County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted
by reference;
WIIERF_AS, Pulte Home Corp. has filed a request with the Local Agency Formation
Commission of Riverside County to annex the subject sites to the City of Temecula and has
requested the City through its application PA94-0062 to pre-zone the subject site prior to its
annexation;
WITERF-A,S, said Specific Plan Amendment application was processed in the time and
manner prescribed by State and local hw;
Wi~EREAS, the Planning Commission considered said Specific Plan Amendment on
January 23, 1995 at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support
or opposition;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commission
recommended approval of said Specific Plan Amendment;
WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing pertaining to said Specific Plan
Amendment on February 28, 1995, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify
either in support or opposition to said Specific Plan Amendment;
WHEREAS, the City Council received a copy of the Commission proceedings and Staff
Report regarding the Specific Plan Amendment;
NOW, THInEFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ~
DOES ORDAIN AS FOT,T~OWS:
R:\STAFFRPT\62PA9~.CC 2/21/95 ktb 5
Section 1. FindinV~. That the Temecula City Council hereby makes the following
fmdings:
A. The City' Council in aimproving the proposed Specific Plan Amendment, makes the
following findings, to wit:
1. The project is consistent with the applicable General plan.
2. The project is compatible with surrounding land uses which are future
residential and commercial developments.
3. The project site is located within the City's Sphere of Influence.
4. Mitigation measures in Bnvironmental Impact Report for Specific Plan No.
213 will reduce the impacts of the project.
5. The site of the proposed project is suitable to accommodate the land uses
permitted in Specific Plan No. 213 due to the fact that the development standards and Conditions
of Approval proposed within the Specific Plan and the mitigation measures within the FBIR
ensure orderly development of the site.
6. Said findings are supported by analysis, maps, exhibits, and environmental
documents associated with this application and herein incorporated by n,*ference.
Section 2. Environmental Compliance. According to Section 15182 of the California
Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, no further environmental analysis is required for this
pwject since an Environmental Impact Report was previously certified by the County.
Section 3. Conditioa~. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby appwves
Amendment No. 2 to Specific Plan No. 213 (PA94-(K)62) to change the ZOning for Planning
Area ll (32 acres) from Very High Density Residential (14-20 units per acre with a maximum
of 360 multi-family .dwellings) to Medium Density Residential (2-5 dwelling units per acre with
a maximum of 150 single family dwellings), located on the southwest corner of Town View
Avenue and Murrieta Hot Springs Road, as more specifically and set forth in PA94-0062, and
subject to the Conditions set forth in Exhibit A to this Ordinance and incorporated herein by this
reference.
Section 4. This Ordinance shall he in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its
passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. The City Clerk shall
publish a summary of thi.~ Ordinance and a certified copy of the full text of this Ordinance shall
be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five days prior to the adoption of this
Ordinance. Within 15 days from adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall publish a
summary of this Ordinance, together with the names of the Councilmembers voting for and
against the Ordinance, and post the same in the office of the City Clerk.
R:\STAFFRPT\62PA96.CC 2/21/95 k~b 6
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTEll this 28th day of February, 1995.
Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SSAL]
STATE OF CALIFO~)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss
crrY OF TEMECULA)
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the
foregoing ~ce No. 95-__ was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular
meeting of the City Council on the 28th day of Febnmry, 1995, and that thereafter, said
Ordinance was duly adopted and passed a regular meeting of the City Council on the 14th day
of March, 1995 by the following roll call vote:
COUNCILlVIItVIBlt~S:
NOES:
COUNCK2ViEMBERS:
COUNTERS:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
R:\STAFFRPT\62PAW,.CC 2121/95 ktb 7
EXHIBIT A
TO ORDINANCE NO. 95- , CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
R:\STAFFRPT\62PA9Z,.CC 2/21/95 ktb 8
EXHIBIT A
TO ORDINANCE NO. 95- , CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR PA94-0062
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Silver Hawk Specific Plan Amendment- Planning Application No. 94-0062
Project Description: A request for approval of Amendment No. 2 of Specific Plan No.
213, Silver Hawk, by changing the zoning of Planning Area 11 from Very High Density
Residential (14-20 dwelling units per acre with a maximum of 360 multi- family
dwellings) to Medium Density Residential (2-5 dwelling units per acre with a maximum
of 150 single family dwellings) and establishing Zoning and Development Standards to '.
allow the development of 150 single family dwellings.
Assessor's Parcel No.:
Approval Date:
914-2604)59 AND 914-260-062
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project
The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or
money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Seventy-Eight Dollars
($78.00) County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption
required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of
Regulations Section 15094 15062.
General Conditions
e
The developer/applicant shall indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless, the City
and any agency or instrumentality thereof, and/or any of its officers, employees and
agents from any and all claims, actions, or proceedings against the City, or any agency
or instrumentality thereof, or any of its officers, employees and agents, to attack, set
aside, void, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting from an approval of the City,
or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative
body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Specific Plan
Amendment which action is brought within the appropriate statute of limitations period
and Public Resources Code, Division 13, Chapter 4 (Section 21000 et seo., including
but not by the way of limitations Section 21152 and 21167). City shall promptly
notify the developer/applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding brought within this
time period. City shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. Should the
City fail to either promptly notify or cooperate fully, developer/applicant shall not,
thereafter be responsible to indemnify, defend, protect, or hold harmless the City, any
agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its officers, employees, or agents·
R:\STAFFRPT\62PA94.CC 2/21/95 ktb 9
e
10.
11.
12.
13.
All development within this site shall be in accordance with the requirements of
Development Agreement No. 9, including all City ordinances applicable under the terms
of Development agreement No. 9.
All Iondoooping oholl bo oonaiotont with tho Wator Effioiont Landooaping Ordinonoo.
This project and all subsequent projects within the site shall comply with all mitigation
measures identified in the Final Environmental Impact Report unless modified by the
Conditions of Approval.
Prior to issuance of grading permits, approval of development permits, recordation of
final maps, issuance of building permits and issuance of occupancy permits for any
subsequent projects or activities within the site, the applicant/developer shall
demonstrate by submittal of a wdtten report that all mitigation measures identified in
the Mitigation Monitoring Program-within the FEIR have been satisfied for the stage of
development that permits are being issued for.
The developer or the developer's successor-in-interest shall be responsible for
maintaining the undeveloped portion of the site including weed abatement and litter
removal.
The applicant shall deposit sufficient funds with the City of Temecula to retain the
services of a qualified consultant to administer and implement the Mitigation Monitoring
Program approved for this project as part of the Environmental Impact Report prepared
for Silver Hawk in compliance with Assembly Bill 3180.
If any of these conditions of approval differ from the Specific Plan text or map exhibits
or any other documents, the conditions enumerated her. in shall take precedence.
Any proposed amendment to this Specific Plan shall require public hearings end review
by the Planning Commission and City Council, and/or shall be reviewed in accordance
with such rules and regulations for the review of Specific Plan Amendments as may
have been adopted by the City and which are in effect at the time of any proposed
amendment is submitted.
The developer, Assessment DistriCt 161 or Community Facilities District 88-4 shall be
responsible to pay all the costs associated with providing the necessary infrastructure
for the project. The City of Temecula shall not be responsible to pay for any necessary
infrastructure improvements associated with this project.
A Mitigation Monitoring Program shall be submitted prior to approval of any
implementing applications.
Approval of the Silver I lawk Spooifie Plan Amondmont No. 2 ia oontingont upon and
ohall not booomo offootivo, nor oholl it root, until tho opplioont hoe rooohod and
rooordod o binding mitigation agroomont with tho Tomooula Volloy Unifiod S;ohool
Dietriot to onouro tho mitigation of tho now otudonta gonoratod by thio projoot if tho
City Counoil adopts tho ~ohool Mitigation Reoolution oe rooommondod for approval by
the Planning Commi~3ion. Refor to tho Tomooula Valloy Unifiod 8ohool Di,3triot lottar
datod January 13, 1001~. (Deleted by Planning Commission on January 23, 1995)
R:\STAFFRPT\62PAg~.CC 2/21/95 ktb 10
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
The following are the Department of Public Works Conditions of Approval for this project, and
shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions regarding the true
meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the appropriate staff person of the Department
of Public Works.
It is understood' that the Developer correctly shows on the tentative site plan all existing and
proposed easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage courses, and their
omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and revision.
General Requirements
14.
The additional access on Murrieta Hot Springs Road has not been reviewed and
approved by the Department of Public Works and should not be considered a part of '
this Specific Plan Amendment. In order for the Department of Public Works to support
this additional access to Murrieta Hot Springs Road, subsequent Traffic Studies will be
required.
15.
All street sections shall correspond with Typical Roadway Cross Sections and
requirements of the Circulation Element of the City's General Plan, City Ordinances and
standards.
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
16.
Pursuant to the City's park land dedication requirements (Quimby), the developer or his
successor(s), shall enter into an agreement and post bonds to dedicate park land, or
pay the appropriate in-lieu fee, prior to recordation of each respective final map.
17.
All park facilities, and/or other recreational areas, intended for transfer to the City "in-
fee" shall be dedicated free and clear of any liens, assessments, or easements that
would preclude the City from using the property for public park and/or recreational
purposes. A policy of title insurance and a soils assessment report shall also be
provided with the dedication of the property.
18.
All park facilities, slope areas, parkway landscaping, trails and medians shall be
improved in conformance with the City of Temecula Landscape Development Plan
Guidelines and Specifications.
19.
Bike lanes and recreational trails shall be designed to intercept with the City's Park and
Recreation Master Plan. Class II bike lanes shall be constructed in concurrence with
the with the street improvements.
20.
Construction of the public park sites, landscaping, trails and medians proposed for
dedication to the City sham commence pursuant to a pre-job meeting with the developer
and the City Maintenance Superintendent. Failure to comply with the City's review and
inspection process may preclude acceptance of these areas into the City's maintenance
program.
R:\STAFFRPT\62PAgA.CC 2/21/95 k(b 11
21.
22.
23.
24.
The developer, or his successor(s), shall maintain all perk facilities, landscaping, trails
and medians until such time as those responsibilities are accepted by the City.
All perimeter walls, interior slopes, and open space shall be maintained by the
individual property owner(s) or an established Home Owners' Association (HOA).
All parks, slope areas, parkway landscaping, trails and medians, identified as City
maintenance areas, shall be offered for dedication on the final map.
Landscape construction drawings for all project areas (slopes, streetscape, medians,
trails and parks) proposed for dedication to the City shall be reviewed and approved by
the Director of Community Services prior to recordation of each respective final map.
R:\STAFFRPT\62'PAW,.CC Z/Z1/95 ktb 12
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
EXHIBITS
R:'~STAFFRPT%62PA94.PC 1 I19/95 en 15
CITY OF TEMECULA ~I
/
/
.... +___
I
I
I
,,. ',TEMEC
"SITE
HOll Plaids
I
f
I
f
f
CASE NO. - PA94-0062
EXHIBIT- A
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE -
JANUARY 23, 1995
VICINITY MAP
R:~'TAFFRFT%62PA94.PC 1112/95
CITY OF TEMECULA
~'~ M t H/C~'
HUN~ER RD i_.
i-,L_' M ~cj .cc }
RH
O
!,1,1
_1
CASE NO. - PA94-0062
,.F-XHisrr- s GENERAL PLAN LAND USE
~,NNING COMMISSION DATE - JANUARY 23, 1995
R:\STAFFFlaT~62PA94.PC 1 I13/95 an
CITY OF TEMECULA ~--
· PU~LK~ FACILITY BITE
CASE NO. - PA94-0062
EXHIBIT- C APPROVED SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE MAe-,,
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - JANUARY 23, 1995
R:%STAFFRP'T~2PA94.PC 1/13/95 mn
A'I'I'ACHMENT NO. 3
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT, JANUARY 23, 1995
R:\STAFFRPT\62PA9/,.CC 2/21/95 k[b 13
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
January 23, 1995
Planning Application No. PA94-0062
Prepared By: Saied Naaseh
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Department Staff recommends the Planning
Commission:
RECOMMEND Adoption of Resolution No. 95-
approving PA 94-0062, based upon the Analysis and
Findings contained in the Staff Report and subject to the
attached Conditions of Approval.
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
Pulte Home Corporation
REPRESENTATIVE:
Sanford Edward
PROPOSAL:
A request for approval of Amendment No. 2 of Specific
Plan No. 213, Silver Hawk, to change the zoning of
Planning Area 11 from Very High Density Residential (14-
20 dwelling units per acre with a maximum of 360 multi-
family dwellings) to Low Medium Density Residential (4-7
dwelling units par acre with a maximum of 150 single
family dwellings) and establish Zoning and Development
Standards to allow the development of 150 single family
dwellings. This amendment will prazone this Planning
Area which may be annexed to the City of Temecula
along with other property within the Specific Ran at a
future date.
LOCATION:
Southwest corner of Town View Avenue and Murrieta Hot
Springs Road.
EXISTING ZONING:
Specific Plan (SP), Very High Density Residential (14-20
dwelling units per acre)
R:~STAFFRPT~62PA94.PC 1 I19/95 an 1
SURROUNDING ZONING:
North:
South:
East:
West:
Specific Plan (Town Center Commercial)
Specific Plan (Medium High Density
Residential, 5-8 dwelling units per acre)
Specific Plan (Very High Density Residential
14-20 dwelling units per acre)
Specific Plan (Open Space, Flood Control)
PROPOSED ZONING:
Specific Plan (Low Medium Residential, 4-7 dwelling units
per acre)
EXISTING GENERAL PLAN
DESIGNATION:
Very High Density Residential (13-20 dwelling units per
acre)
PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN
DESIGNATION:
N/A
EXISTING SWAP DESIGNATION: Specific Plan
EXISTING LAND USE:
VBcant
SURROUNDING LAND USES:
North: Vacant
South: Vacant
East: Vacant
West: Vacant
PROJECT STATISTICS
The approved Silver Hawk Specific Plan area includes approximately 1042 acres and permits
a maximum of 2478 dwelling units with a gross density of 2.37 dwelling units per acre. The
proposed amendment reduces the total dwelling units by 210 to 2268. This decrease is due
to the proposed reduction of multi-family units by 360 and addition of 150 single family
dwellings to Planning Area 11.
BACKGROUND
The Silver Hawk Specific Plan is located outside the City Limits and within the City's Sphere
of Influence. The Specific Plan was approved by the County Board of Supervisors in 1987.
A subsequent amendment was also approved in 1988. This amendment included the
Architectural and Landscaping Design Guidelines and the Zoning Standards. Specific Plan No.
213 and its subsequent amendments are vested by Development Agreement No. 9.
According to Government Code Sections 65450 and 65330, the City may adopt Specific Plan
Amendments outside of its City Limits and within its Sphere of Influence. The Specific Plan
Amendment is a replacement for traditional zoning and establishes a pre-zoning of a property
for future annexation to the City. This amendment does not become effective until the
annexation becomes effective. Therefore, if Planning Area 11 is not annexed to the City, its
zoning will remain Very High Density Residential (14-20 dwelling units per acre).
R:~STAFFRPT%e2PA94.PC 1 I19/96 en 2
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed project is an amendment to Specific Plan No. 213. This amendment eliminates
360 multi-family units in Planning Area 11, replaces them with 150 single family dwellings,
and sets the Zoning and Development Standards to develop these houses. This amendment
pre-zones Planning Area 11 which may be annexed to the City at a later date along with more
property within the Silver Hawk Specific Plan.
ANALYSIS
This amendment is essentially a down zoning of Planning Area 11 which eliminates 360 multi-
family units in Planning Area 11 and replaces them with 150 single family dwellings. The
applicant may annex any portion of the Silver Hawk Specific Plan that is contiguous to the
City Limits without pre-zoning by filing an annexation application. However, since the
applicant is requesting this down zoning, a pre-zoning of Planning Area 11 is necessary prior
to filing for an annexation application. Therefore, the approval of this amendment paves the
way for the potential future annexation of this Planning Area along with more property within
the Silver Hawk Specific Plan. The approval of this amendment does not bind the City to
annex this Planning Area or any other property within Silver Hawk. A separate annexation
application has to be filed with the City. At that time, a Fiscal Impact Analysis will be
prepared by the applicant to analyze impacts of this potential annexation on the City Budget.
Moreover, a Property Tax Agreement will be signed between the City and the County before
the annexation is complete. This agreement will specify the portion of the property tax that
the City will receive from the County.
Furthermore, at the time of annexation, the applicant needs to amend the Land Use Element
of the City of Temecula General Plan. The current General Plan designation is High Density
Residential (13-20 dwelling units per acre) which needs to be changed to Low Medium Density
residential (3-6 dwelling units per acre). The City Attorney has determined that this
amendment may be approved without the benefit of this General Plan Amendment since the
pre-zoning of Planning Area 11 does not become effective until the annexation is approved.
This down zoning from multi-family units to single family units may have impacts on the
Housing Element of the City's General Plan. Again, just like the General Plan Amendment and
the Fiscal Impact Analysis, this impact will be analyzed with the annexation application. The
General Plan states:
"The Housing Element is a comprehensive statement by the City of Temecula of its
commitment to facilitate the provision of housing that meets the needs of existing and
future residents. This commitment is in furtherance of the statewide housing goal to
attain decent housing and suitable living environment for every California family, while
remaining responsive to the unique concerns of the community."
The approval of the annexation will result in a reduction in multi-family units; therefore, it has
a potential impact on the Housing Element.
The approved Silver Hawk Specific Plan committed only a total of eight (8) acres of parks on
its Land Use Map. Since the eight (8) acres of parks do not meet the Quimby Act
requirements, the County conditioned the underlying maps to pay fees to satisfy these
requirements. This amendment has been conditioned to require the future maps to pay
R:~.STAFFRPT~62PA94.PC 1 I19/95 en 3
Quimby Fees in accordance with the City's Quimby Ordinance, if the property is annexed to
the City (refer to Condition 16).
Staff received a letter from the School District requesting a mitigation agreement to be signed
between the developer and the applicant prior to the public hearing. Staff has conditioned this
project consistent with the Johnson Ranch Specific Plan (refer to Condition No. 13).
EXISTING ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION
The existing County zoning for the site is Specific Plan (Very High Density Residential). This
amendment will change the zoning to Low Medium Residential and includes Zoning and
Development Standards to ensure proper development of the site. The project is consistent
with the applicable General Plan.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
According to Section 15182 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, no further
environmental analysis is required for this project since an Environmental Impact Report was
previously certified by the County.
SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS
The approval of this amendment will replace 360 multi-family dwellings with 150 single famRy
dwellings and will pre-zone the property for possible future annexation. At the time of
annexation, an amendment to the Land Use Element of the General Plan, a Fiscal Impact
Analysis, a Property Tax Agreement with the County and an examination of the Housing
Element of the General Plan will be necessary to implement the approval of this project.
FINDINGS
1. The project is consistent with the applicable General Plan.
The project is compatible with surrounding land uses which are future residential and
commercial developments.
3. The project site is located within the City's Sphere of Influence.
Mitigation measures in Environmental Impact Report for Specific Plan No. 213 will
reduce the impacts of the project.
The site of the proposed project is suitable to accommodate the land uses permitted
in Specific Plan No. 213 due to the fact that the development standards and Conditions
of Approval proposed within the Specific Plan and the mitigation measures within the
FEIR ensure orderly development of the site.
Said findings are supported by analysis, maps, exhibits, and environmental documents
associated with this application and her.in incorporated by reference.
R:~STAFFRPT~62PA94.PC 1119/95 an 4
Attachments:
PC Resolution - Blue Page 6
Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 10
Exhibits - Blue Page 15
A. Vicinity Map
B. General Plan Land Use
C. Approved Specific Plan Land Use Map
R:%STAFFRPT'%62PA94.PC 1 I19/95 sn 5
ATTACHMENT N0.1
PC RESOLUTION N0.95-
R:%STAFFFia~e2PA94.PC 1119/95 en 6
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
PC RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING CO1VI1V!IgSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA RECO~ING APPROVAL OF AMEND1V~NT NO. 2 OF
SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 213 (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 94-0062)
PROPOSING CHANGING THE ZONING FOR PLANNING AREA 11
FROM VERY tlIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (1420 DW~.LLING UNITS
PER ACRE) TO LOW MEnlUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (4-7
DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) AND SETTING ZONING AND
DEVI~.LOPMENT STANDARDS TO ALLOW THE DEVELOPMENT OF
~ SINGLI~- FAMILY DWF-LLINGS. THIS AMENDMENT WILL
PREZONE Tier PLANNING AREA W!~CH MAY BE ANNEXED TO THE
CITY OF TEMF_EUIA ALONG WITH OTHER PROPERTY WITHIN THE
SPECIFIC PLAN AT A FUTURE DATE. THE PROJECT IS LOCATED ON
THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF MURRIETA HOT SPRINGS ROAD AND
TOWN VIEW AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 914-260-059
AND 914-260-062
WHEREAS, Pulte Home Corp. filed said application in accordance with the Riverside
County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted
by reference and applicable State Laws;
WHEREAS, said application was processed in the time and manner prescribed by State
and local hw;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered said application on January 23, 1995
at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commission
recommended approval of said application;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMIRSION OF THE CITY OF
TI~VIECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Findings. That the Temecula Planning Commission hereby makes the
following findings:
A. The Planning Commission in recommending approval of said application makes
the following findings, to wit:
1. The project is consistent with the applicable General Plan.
2. The project is compatible with surrounding land uses which are future
residential and commercial developments.
R:%STAFFRP'I~62PA94.PC 1 ll 9/95 an 7
3. The project site is located within the City's Sphere of Influence.
4. Mitigation measures in Environmental Impact Report for Specific Plan No.
213 will reduce the impacts of the project.
5. The site of the proposed project is suitable to accommodate the land uses
permitted in Specific Plan No. 213 due to the fact that the development standards and Conditions
of Approval proposed within the Specific Plan and the mitigation measures within the FEIR
ensure orderly development of the site.
6. Said findings are supported by analysis, maps, exhibits, and environmental
documents associated with this application and herein incorporated by reference.
B. As conditioned pursuant to Section 3.
Seaion 2. l=-nvironmental Compliance. According to Section 15182 of the California
Environmental Quality Act Guidelines no further environmental analysis is required for this
project since an Environmental Impact Report was previously certified by the County.
Section 3. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby
recommends approval of Amendment No. 2 of Specific Plan No. 213 (Planning Application No.
94- 0062) located on the southwest corner of Town View and Murrieta Hot Springs Road.
A. Attachment No. 2, attached hereto.
Section 4. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOFrED this 23rd day of January, 1995.
STEVEN I. FORD
CHAIRMAN
R:%STAFFFIPT~e2PA94.PC 1 I19/95 an 8
I I~ZRF.,BY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 23rd day of
January, 1995 by the following vote of the Commission:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
G~Y~ORNHILL
S~RET~Y
R:~,STAFFRFT"~62PAg,4.PC 1 119/95 an 9
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
R:~STAFFRPT'~62PA94.PC 1119/95 .n 10
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Silver Hawk Specific Plan Amendment- Planning Applicatien No. 94-0062
Project Description:
A request for approval of Amendment No. 2 of Specific
Plan No. 213, Silver Hawk, by changing the zoning of
Planning Area 11 from Very High Density Residential { 14-
20 dwelling units per acre with a maximum of 360 multi-
family dwellings) to Low. Medium Density Residential (4-7
dwelling units per acre with a maximum of 150 single-.
fam~y dwe~ings) and establishing Zoning and
Development Standards to allow the development of 150
single family dwellings. This amendment will prezone this
Planning Area which may be annexed to the City of
Temecula along with other property within the Specific
Plan at a future date.
Assessor's Parcel No.:
Approval Date:
914-260-0 59 AND 914-260-062
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project
The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or
money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Seventy-Eight Dollars
($78.00) County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of
Determination required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California
Code of Regulations Section 15094. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the
applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required
above, the approval for the project granted herein shall be void by reason of failure of
condition, Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c).
General Conditions
The developer/applicant shall indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless, the City
and any agency or instrumentality thereof, and/or any of its officers, employees and
agents from any and all claims, actions, or proceedings against the City, or any agency
or instrumentality thereof, or any of its officers, employees and agents, to attack, set
aside, void, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting from an approval of the City,
or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative
body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Specific Plan
Amendment which action is brought within the appropriate statute of limitations period
and Public Resources Code, Division 13, Chapter 4 (Section 21000 et seo., including
R:%STAFFRPT~62PA94.PC 1119/95 an 11
10.
11.
but not by the way of limitations Section 21152 and 21167). City shall promptly
notify the developer/applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding brought within this
time period. City shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. Should the
City fail to either promptly notify or cooperate fully, developer/applicant shall not,
thereafter be responsible to indemnify, defend, protect, or hold harmless the City, any
agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its officers, employees, or agents.
All development within this site shall be in accordance with the requirements of all City
ordinances, except as expressly modified her. in, and State laws, and shall conform
with the approved Specific Plan. Regulations or procedures not covered by the Specific
Plan or appurtenant documents shall be subject to the City ordinances in effect at the
time entitlement is required.
All landscaping shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Landscaping Ordinance.
This project and all subsequent projects within the site shall comply with all mitigation
measures identified in the Final Environmental Impact Report unless modified by the
Conditions of Approval.
Prior to issuance of grading permits, approval of development permits, recordation of
final maps, issuance of building permits and issuance of occupancy permits for any
subsequent projects or activities within the site, the applicant/developer shall
demonstrate by submittal of a written report that all mitigation measures identified in
the Mitigation Monitoring Program within the FEIR have been satisfied for the stage of
development that permits are being issued for.
The developer or. the developer's successor-in-interest shall be responsible for
maintaining the undeveloped portion of the site including weed abatement and litter
removal.
The applicant shall deposit sufficient funds with the City of Temecula to retain the
services of a qualified consultant to administer and implement the Mitigation Monitoring
Program approved for this project as part of Environmental Impact Report for Silver
Hawk in compliance with Assembly Bill 3180.
If any of these conditions of approval differ from the Specific Plan text or map exhibits
or any other documents, the conditions enumerated her. in shall take precedence.
Any proposed amendment to this Specific Plan shall require public hearings and review
by the Planning Commission and City Council, and/or shall be reviewed in accordance
with such rules and regulations for the review of Specific Plan Amendments as may
have been adopted by the City and which are in effect at the time of any proposed
amendment is submitted.
The developer or Assessment District 161 shall be responsible to pay all the costs
associated with providing the necessary infrastructure for the project. The City of
Temecula shall not be responsible to pay for any necessary infrastructure
improvements associated with this project.
R:%STAFFFI:r~62PA94,PC 1119/95 .n 12
12.
A Mitigation Monitoring Program shall be submitted prior to approval of any
implementing applications.
13.
Approval of the Silver Hawk Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 is contingent upon and
shall not become effective, nor shall it vest, until the applicant has reached and
recorded a binding mitigation agreement with the Temecula Valley Unified School
District to ensure the mitigation of the new students generated by this project if the
City Council adopts the School Mitigation Resolution as recommended for approval by
the Planning Commission. Refer to the Temecula Valley Unified School District letter
dated January 13, 1995.
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
The following are the Department of Public Works Conditions of Approval for this project, and
shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions regarding the true-
meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the appropriate staff person of the Department
of Public Works.
It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the tentative site plan all existing and
proposed easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage courses, and their
omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and revision.
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
14.
The additional access on Murrieta Hot Springs Road has not been reviewed and
approved by the Department of Public Works and should not be considered a part of
this Specific Plan Amendment. In order for the DPW to support this additional access
to Murrieta Hot Springs Road, subsequent Traffic Studies will be required.
15.
All street sections shall correspond with Typical Roadway Cross Sections and
requirements of the Circulation Element of the City's General Plan, City ordinances and
standards.
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
16.
Pursuant to the City's park land dedication requirements (Quimby), the developer or his
successor(s), shall enter into an agreement and post bonds to dedicate park land, or
pay the appropriate in-lieu fee, prior to recordation of each respective final map.
17.
All park facilities, and/or other recreational areas, intended for transfer to the City "in-
fee" shall be dedicated free and clear of any liens, assessments, or easements that
would preclude the City from using the property for public park and/or recreational
purposes. A policy of title insurance and a soils assessment report shall also be
provided with the dedication of the property.
18.
All park facilities, slope areas, parkway landscaping, trails and medians shall be
improved in conformance with the City of Temecula Landscape Development Plan
Guidelines and Specifications.
19. Bike lanes and recreational trails shall be designed to intercept will the City's Park and
R:~STAFFRPT~62PA94.PC 1 119/95 en 13
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
Recreation Master Plan. Class II bike lanes shall be constructed in concurrence with
the with the street improvements.
Construction of the public park sites, landscaping, trails and medians proposed for
dedication to the City shall commence pursuant to a pre-job meeting with the developer
and the City Maintenance Superintendent. Failure to comply with the City's review and
inspection process may preclude acceptance of these areas into the City's maintenance
program.
The developer, or his successor(s), shall maintain all park facilities, landscaping, trails
and medians until such time as those responsibilities are accepted by the City.
All perimeter walls, interior slopes, and open space shall be maintained by the
individual property owner(s) or an established Home Owners' Association (HOA).
All parks, slope areas, parkway landscaping, trails and medians, identified as City
maintenance areas, shall be offered for dedication on the final map.
Landscape construction drawings for all project areas (slopes, streetscape, medians,
trails and parks) proposed for dedication to the City shall be reviewed and approved by
the Director of Community Services prior to recordation of each respective final map.
R:%STAFFRPl~62PA94.PC 1 I19/95 en 14
January 13, 1995
TEMECULA VALLEY
Unified School District
SUPERINTENDENT
Patricia B. Novotney, Ed.D.
BOARD OF EDUCATION
Rosle Van0erf~aak
Baroara Tooker
Lincla CamD0ell
Dr. David Eunch
Memoe,
RiChard Shater
Me<nee,
Saied Naaseh, Associate Planner
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
SUBJECT:
Planning area II
Specffic Plan 213 (Pults)
Dear Mr. Naaseh:
The Temecula Valley Unifmd School District provides the following comments on the subject
project, as you requested.
School Facilities Mitigation Agreement
The proposed development includes 150 residential units, generating the following approximate
number of students:
Elementary School: 58
Middle School: 36
High School: 38
Total 132
All existing school facilities near this project are at or over their permanent capacity.
A signed mitigation agreement will be required between the developer and the School District in
accordance with the Specific Plan No. 213 conditions of approval (see attachment), to ensure
adequate facilities for these new students.
Sidewalks
Adequate sidewalks must be provided, for students who would walk to school or bus stops.
The Temecula Valley Unified School District requests that the above issues be resolved prior to the
public hearing.
Director of Facilities Development
CC:
Patricia B. Novotney, Ed.D., Superintendent
John Brooks, Assistant Superintendent Business Services
Janet Dixon, Facilities Planning Analyst
Sanford Edward, Master Plan Development
31350 Rancho Vista Road /Ternecula, CA 92592 / (909) 676-2661
Spe~tflc Flee Ito, 223 keel No. ~
L" SpNtfiC Plan Jig. 21! ANnamet IW. ! shall coastal of the fellertrig:
~'b. Exhibit abe: SDeCtffC Plea Carnations Of ApPrOval
"348 and 444 end s'uSa le~s& Bad shall confine lubstantla11~fvt~h adoDied
l~grs udtor t~ reqV~rmets se~ feKk by these agencies It the
~ ;lead CentFelt IM eh 12. lgll see Pay 1~. :1987
. fleltk gelermeet~
!. l,Firill
i f~ ColIf,),/dlllellLrlthe Offtent ParCh ~, ~,988
: Tits Uhiell Selma1 O!lt,.* dlnulW IS, 1988
'~' 2~ % ell ~e the [1lieaPe mto~ Ht~h SchoOl Dill;rice and ~he Tell Uaton
S~0:1 Olinrice Slmll be mitigated at, r, he loreleiwet appliesglen stale
; mcseedince wtl;h ~he DIll;rice policies 111 effl~ m~ Ca ttm of ~rac~
' ~ eelillegal
.
ITEM 14
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROV
CITY ATTORNEY~
FINANCE OFFICE
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning
February 28, 1995
City of Temecula's Vendor's Ordinance
Prepared By: Debbie Ubnoske, Senior Planner
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council:
Adopt a Resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 95-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA MAKING CERTAIN RNDINGS IN CONNECTION WITH
THE APPROVAL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA VENDOR'S
ORDINANCE AND ADOPTING THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION.
Introduce and read by title only an Ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 95-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA PERTAINING TO OUTDOOR VENDORS AND
ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS FOR OUTDOOR VENDING.
BACKGROUND
The City of Temecula Vendor's Ordinance was unanimously recommended for approval by the
Planning Commission on December 5, 1994. At the Planning Commission meeting, a number
of comments were made by the Commissioners. These comments included: defining
"developed' and "courtyard" and adding language to the Ordinance that: 1 ) requires property
owners permission to operate a vending cart; 2) prohibits the sale of alcohol from the vending
carts, unless it is a special event; 3) prohibiting flashing lights or other similar potentially
"disturbing" lights on the carts; 4) requiring approvals\clearances from the Health Department
if food is to be sold; and 5) prohibiting the maximum height of the standto eight (8) feet with
no appurtenances exceeding the eight (8) feet height limit. These comments have all been
incorporated into the Ordinance.
R:XS'fAFFRF~V~qlX}R.ORD 2/21/95 Idb 1
Subsequent to the Planning Commission meeting, staff re-assessed the Iocational standards
requiring vendors to locate in a "recognizable plaza or courtyard area." Staff feels this
Iocational standard will preclude vendors from locating in areas that might be appropriate.
Therefore, staff changed the Ordinance to read that vendors should locate in areas where
there is "at least 200 square feet of useable area."
RSCAL IMPACT
While the exact fiscal impact is unknown at this time, it is anticipated that allowing vendors
to locate in developed areas of the City will result in increased sales tax to the City.
Attachments:
2.
3.
4.
Resolution No. 95- - Page 3
Ordinance No. 95- - Page 7
Planning Commission Staff Report dated December 5, 1994 - Page 8
Planning Commission Staff Report dated November 7, 1994- Page 9
it:',S'rAFFRR~VBNlX)R.ORD 2/21/95 Idb 2
ATTACHMENT NO. ~ ~:
RESOLUTION NO. 95-
R:~q'rA,q;RY~V~qDOR.OD :2/21/~G k.lb
3
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
RESOLUTION NO. 95-
A RESOL~ON OF THF~ C1TY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY
OF TI~MECULA MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN
CONNECTION WITH THF~ APPROVAL OF ~ CITY OF
TEMECULA VENDOR'S ORDINANCE AND ADOFFING
THY~ NEGATIVE DECLARATION.
WheREaS, THF- CITY OF TI~IECULA prepared the Vendor's Ordinance in
accordance with the City d Temecula General Plan and Rive~ide County Land Use and"
Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference;
W!~l~n~,S, The Vendor's Ordinance was processed in the time and manner prescribed
by State and local hw;
~ EA~, the planning Commission considered the Vendor' s Ordinance on November
7, 1994 and December 5, 1994, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which
time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or in opposition;
WFt!~lr.~kS, at the conclusion of the December 5, 1994 Commission hearing, the
Commission recommended approval of said Ordinance;
WI~:REAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing pertaining to said Ordinance
on February 28, 1995, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in
support or opposition to said Ordinance;
WItERIr. AS, the City Council received a copy of the Cornminion proceedings and Staff
Report regarding the Ordinance;
NOW, TH]~~, THF~ CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY OF ~
DOES I~'-~OLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOx.lOWS:
Section 1. Findi~. That the Temecuh City Council hereby makes the following
findings:
A. The City Council in approving the proposed Ordinance, makes the following
findings, to wit:
1. Vendors offer the citizens of the community an alternative service.
2. Vendors will promote the public imerest by contributing to an active
pedestrian environment.
~.:~'TAirFRN~VBNDOR.ORD 2/~!/95 Hb 4
3. The action proposed is consi._~'nt with the General plan Village Center
policies which call for pedestrisn oriented uses.
4. The action proposed complies with all other applicable requirements of
state law and local ordinances.
Section 2. Environmental Compliance. The City Council in adopting the Negative
Declaration of environmental impact under the provisions of the California Environmental
Quality Act, specifically fin& that the approval of the proposed Vendor Ordinance will have a
di minimls impact on fish and wildllfe resources. The City Council specifically finds that in
considering the record as a whole, the project involves no potet~tial adverse effect, either
individually or cumulatively, on wildlife as the same is defined in Section 711.2 of the Fish and
Game Code~ This is based on the fact that this all vendors will be located on improved
commercial property. The City Council further finds that the City of Temecula is the project '-
proponent and the site is located Citywide, Temecula, California. Furthermore, the City Council
finds that an initial study has been prepared by the City Staff and considered by the City Council
which has been the basis to evaluate the potential for adverse impact on the environment and
forms the basis for the City Council' s determination, including the information contained in the
public hearing records, on which a Negative Declaration of environmental impact was issued and
this di minimi,~ finding is made. In addition, the City Council finds that there is no evidence
before the City that the proposed project wffi have any potential for an adverse effect on wildlife
resou~, or the habitat on which the wildlife depends. Finally, the City Council finds that the
City has, on the basis of substantial evidence, xP. butted the presumption of adverse effect
contained in 14 California Code of Regulations 753.5(d). The Negative Declaration is hereby
approved.
Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Rr, solution.
R:~"TAPFRF~V!~/DOR.ORD 2t21/9~ Idb 5
Section 4. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTIn) this 28th day of February, 1995 .
Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor
ATTF. ST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF ~ULA)
I ~lmV. ny (~!~crtFf that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City
Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 28th day of Febnutty,
1995 by the following vote of the Council:
COUNCHIIEMBERS:
NO~S:
COUNTERS:
COUN~EP, S:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
R:~TAFFRF~VENDOR.ORD 2/21/95 lab 6
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
ORDINANCE NO. 95-
R:~S'TAFFRPI~VBNIX)R.ORD 2/'21/95 /LIb 7
ORDINANCE NO. 95-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMF_,CULA PERTAINING TO OUTDOOR VENDORS
AND ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS FOR OUTDOOR
VENDING.
WHERF_AS, the City Council of the City of Temecula hereby finds that Outdoor
Vending on private property promotes public interest by contributing to an active pedestrian
environment, and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Temecula further finds that reasonable
regulation of outdoor vending is necessary to protect the public health, safety, and welfare.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Finding. That the Temecula City Council hereby mak~ the following
findings:
A. The phnning agency and City' Council find, in appmving projects, adopting
land use regulations, and taking other actions, each of the foBowing:
1. That the regulations of outdoor vending activities set forth herein axe
consistent with the General Plan because the proposed action is consistent with the General
Plan Village Center Policies which call for pedestrian oriented uses.
2. The proposed use or action complies with all other applicable
requirements of state hw and local ordinances.
Section 2. "Purpose. The purpose of this Chapter is to set forth the development
standards for the siting of outdoor vendors within the City limits. The purpose of these
standards is to ensure that the design and location of these vendors are consistent with the
health, safety, and aesthetic objectives of the City.
It is a desire of the City that the design of this community be of the highest quality,
that new development be architecturally distinctive as well as homogeneous in design, and
that accessory facih'ties be compatible with the overall theme of the community.
Recognizing that outdoor vendors Offer the citizens of the community an alternative
service, the regulations of this Chapter are enacted W:
R:\STAFFRPT\VENDORS2.0RD 2/16/95 du
A. Promote public inter~t by contributing to an active pedestrian environment;
B. Set forth the conditions and requirements under which outdoor vendors may be
permitted to operate on private property.
Section 3. Definitions. For purposes of this Chapter, the following words, terms,
phrases, and their derivations, shall have the meanings given herein. Then, consistent with
the context, words used in the present tense singular include the plural.
A. 'Applicant' means any person 'who seeks to obtain a vending license pursuant
to the procedures and requirements of this Chapter.
B. 'Developed' means property that is fully improved.
C. 'Outdoor Vending License' means a license obtained pursuant to the
procedures and requirements of this Chapter which permits a vendor to sell food or
merchandise from a vending stand on private pwperty subject to the limitations of this
Chapter and any other applicable hws.
D. 'Outdoor Vendor' means any person who sells food or merchandise from a
vending stand.
E. 'Private Property' means privately owned, developed, commercial property
within the City limits.
F. 'Pushcart' means any device designed to be moved by human power,
including, but not lirnit{~l to, wagons, or other wheeled containers or conveyances.
G. 'Vending' means the sale of f~Dcl or merchandise from a vending stand
operating on private property within the City limits.
H. 'Vending Stand' means a pushcan, wagon, or any other wheeled vehicle or
device which may be moved without the assistance of a motor or which may be towed by
motor vehicle to the outdoor vending location and is used for the disphying, storing, or
transporting of articles offered for sale by an outdoor vendor.
Section 4. T,ieep~e and Application
A. Yicen ling. It shall be unlawful to sell, or offer for sale, any food, beverage,
or merchandise from a vending stand on any private property within the City limits without
first obtaining an Outdoor Vending License. Existing businesses which legally operate
outdoor disphys of merchandise prior to the adoption of this Chapter, are not required to
obtain an Outdoor Vending License for a period of one year from adoption of the Ordinance.
R:\STAFFRPT\VENDORS2.0RD 2116195 du -2-
B. Application. The application for an Outdoor Vending License sb~ll be signed
by the applicant and shall include the foliowing:
1. The name, home, and business address of the applicant, and the name
and address of the owner (if other than the applicant) of the vending stand to be used in the
operation of the rending business.
2. A description of the type of food, beverage, or merchandise to be sold.
3. A description and photograph (including signage and colon) of any
vending stand to be used in the operation of the business.
4. A site plan delineating the location of the vending stand.
5. A photograph or dra. wipg of the rending stand to be used for review
during the application approval process, showing materials, colon, and signage.
6. An application fee as eslablished by Resolution of the City Council.
Section 5.
Written consent of the property owner W make the application.
l-~mance.
A. Not hter than thirty (30) days after the filing of a completed application for an
Outdoor Vending License, the Director of Planning shall appwve, deny, or conditionally
appwve the application and notify the applicant of his or her decision.
B. Licenses to vend outdoor within the City limits shall be reviewed and appwved
by the Director of Planning in conjunction with the Business License Registration Program,
Building and Safety, and Public Works Departments.
C. There shall be at least two-hundred square feet (200 sq. ~.) of useable area for
each allowed vending stand. The vending stand shall be free of all obstructions within a six
foot (6') perimeter.
D. Locations for vending in the City shall be approved by the Planning Director.
Vending locations shall be designated based on the ability of the site to safely accommodate
the use by not interfering with pedestrian circ~tion and access or vehicle circulation or
parking. The Planning Director may require that the vending stand be removed from the
location and stored out of public view when not in use.
E. Vend_ing locations may change only upon written request by an applicant
and/or Outdoor Vending Licensee and approval of the Director of Planning.
R:\STAFFRPT\VEHDORS2.0P-D 2/16/95 du -3-
Chapter.
All vending locations shall be on private property as previously defined in this
Section 6. Term and Renewal.
A. All Outdoor Vending Licenses are valid for one year unless revoked or
suspended prior to expiration. An application to renew an Outdoor Ventling License shall be
made not later than sixty (60) days before the expiration of the current Outdoor Vending
Business License Registration Program procedures outlined in this Code.
Section 7. Prohibited Conduct and Hours of Operation.
conditions:
It shall be prohibited for any vendor to operate under any of the following
1. Operate between 10:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. of the following day unless
in conjunction with a special event as set forth in Riverside County Ordinance No. 348,
Section 19.51 as adopted by the City.
2. Leave any vending stand unattended.
3. Store, park, or leave any vending stand within any public right-of-way
or on any undeveloped or otherwise vacant property.
4. Sell food or beverages without appropriate Health Department permits
for immediate consumption or otherwise unless there is a litter receptacle available nearby
for public use. Alcohol sales shall not be permitted unless in conjunction with a special
event.
5. Leave any location without first picking up, removing, and disposing of
all Wash or refuse remaining from sales made from the vending stand.
6. Allow any items rehting to the operation of the vending business to be
phced anywhere other than in, or under the vending stand.
7. Set up, maintain, or permit the use of any additional table, crate,
carton, rack, or other device to increase the selling or display capacity of the vending stand
where such additional items have not been approved by the Director of Planning.
8. Solicit or conduct bUsihess with persons in motor vehicles.
e
Sell anything other than that which the Outdoor Vending License
R:\STAFFRPT\VENDORS2.0RD 2/16/95 du .-4-
10. Sound or permit the sounding of any device which produces a loud and
raucous noise, or use or operate any loud speaker, public address system, radio, sound
amplifier, or similar device to attract the attention of the public. Have any flashing, rotating,
or other similar lights or lighting to attract the attention of the public or in violation of the
California Vehicle Code Section 21466.5.
Section 8. Safety R~uirements.
A. All rending stands in or frOm'which food is prepared or sold shall comply
with the following requirements:
1. All equipment installed in any pan of the vending stand shall be
secured in order to prevent movement during Wansit and to prevent detachment in the event
of a collision or overturn.
2. All utensils shall be stored in order to prevent their being hurled about
in the event of a sudden stop, collision, or overturn. A safety knife holder shall be provided
to avoid loose storage of knives.
3. Compressors, auxiliary engines, generators, batteries, battery chargers,
gas fueled water heaters, and similar equipment shall be installed so as to be hidden from .
view to the extent possible and be easily accessible..
B. No vending stand shall exceed four feet (4') in width, six feet (6') in length,
and eight feet (8') in height, inclusive of signage, umbrellas, etc.
Section 9. Display of Outdoor Vend|no T~eense.
A. All Outdoor Vending Licenses shall be displayed in a visible and conspicuous
location at all times during the operation of the vending business.
Section 10. Advertising.
A. No advertising, except the posting of prices, shall be permitted on any vending
stand, except to identify the name of the product or the name of the vendor.
Section 11. Denial. Stmpenslon. and Revocation.
A. Any Outdoor Vending License may be denied, suspended, or revoked in
accordance with the procedures contained in this Code for any of the following causes:
1. Fraud or misrepresentation contained in the application for the Outdoor
Vending License.
R:\STAFFRPT\VEMDOeS2.ORD 2/16/95 clu - -5-
2. Conduct of the licensed business in such a manner as to create a public
nuisance, or constitute a danger to the public health, safety, welfare, or mornl__s.
3. Conduct which is conWary to the provisions of this Chapter.
B. Any person wishing to appeal any denial, suspension, or revocation of an
Outdoor Vending License may do so, pursuant to the authority and procedures of Chapter
2.36 of this Code.
Section 12. Penalty for Violation
A. Any viohtion of any of the requirements of this Chapter shall be an infraction
and any viohtor may be pUniS!g~d pursuant to Section 1.20 et l!~l- of this Code.'
Section 13. If any section, subsectiOn, subdivision, sentence, chuse, phrase, or
portion of this Ordinance, is for any reasons held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the
decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of
the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would
have adopted this Ordinance, and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, chuse,
phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections,
subdivisions, sentences, chuses, phrases, or portions thereof be declared invalid or ..
unconstitutional.
Section 14. The City Clest shall cause this Ordinance to be appropriately codified in
the Municipal Code.
Section 1f. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its
passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. The City Clerk
shall publish a summary of this Oniinance and a certified copy of the full text of this
Ordinance shall be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five days prior to the
adoption of this Ordinance. Within 15 days from adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk
shall publish a summary of this Olxlinance, together with the names of the Councilmembers
voting for and against the Ordinance, and .pq. st the same in the office of the City Clerk.
R:\STAFFRPT\VEII)ORS2.OP, D 7../16/95 du
Section 16. PASSED AND APPRO.VED this 28th day of February, 1995.
ATTEST:
MAYOR
June S. Greek, City Cl~rk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Gregory G. Diaz
Assistant City Attorney
[SEAL]
R:\STAFFRPT\VENDO!tS2.ORD 2/16/95 clu -'7-
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
CITY OF TEMECULA
x, , city 1~ m~ city of "~C:';: ,
do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 9~,!~was regularly introduced and
placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of thei.,Ci,'ty Council on the 28tli'day of
February, 1995. That thereafter, said Ordinance was d~.y adopted and passed ai'~a regular
meeting of the City Council on the 14th day of March,: by the following
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMI=-MBERS:
R:\STAFFRPT\VENDORS2.(ID 2/16/~5 du
-8-
to wit:
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DATED DECEMBER 5, 1994
R:~ST.a. kFI~.R~VINDOR.ORD :2/21/95 lr, lb 8
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBFr, Cr:
Planning Commissionea~
Gary Thornhill, Director of planning
December 5, 1994
Vendor' s Ordinance
Prepared By: Debbie Ubnosim, Senior Planner
BACKGROUND
The Vendor's Ordinance was on the Planning Commission's November 7, 1994 agenda.
However, due to the lateness of the hour, the Planning Commission did not hear this item, but
rather, continued it to the meeting of December 5, 1994.
Subsequent to the November 7, 1994 pknning Commission meeting, the Assistant City Attorney
made some minor changes to the Vendor's Ordinance. No substantive changes were made.
AT!'ACHMENT NO. 4
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DATED NOVEMBER 7, 1994
R:~STAYPRPI~VENDOR.ORD 2/21/95 Idb 9
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
November 7, 1994
City of Temecula Vendor's Ordinance
Prepared By: Debbie Ubnoske, Senior Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Department Staff recommends the Planning
Commission:
ADOPT the Negative Declaration for City of Temecula
Vendor's Ordinance; and
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
REPRESENTATIVE:
PROPOSAL:
LOCATION:
APPROVE the City of Temecula's Vendor's Ordinance.
City of Temecula
City of Temecula
An Ordinance pertaining to street vendors
establishing regulations for outdoor vending.
and
City Wide
EXISTING ZONING:
SURROUNDING ZONING:
N~A
North: N~A
South: N~A
East: N~A
West: N~A
PROPOSED ZONING: N~A
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: N~,
EXISTING LAND USE: N~A
SURROUNDING LAND USES:
North: N~A
South: N~A
East: N~A
West: N~A
R:~,STAFFRpT~VENDOR.PC 2116/95 klb 1
PROJECT STATISTICS
Total Area 26 square miles
BACKGROUND
At the July 12, 1994 City Council Meeting, during City Council reports, Mayor Pro Tam Jeff
Stone requested staff prepare an Ordinance to address transient and road side vending within
City limits for the purpose of assisting in enforcement. This matter was placed on the
September 13, 1994 City Council agenda to allow the City Council the opportunity to provide
direction to staff on the preparation of a vending ordinance.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
At the present time, the City of Temecula has no vending ordinance which would permit.
vendors to sell wares within the City limits. The Old Town Specific Plan does contain
language which allows vendors. This Ordinance has been modeled after the language
contained in the Old Town Specific Plan..
The purpose of this Ordinance is to set forth development standards for the siting of vendors
within the City limits. These standards will ensure that the design and location of these
vendors are consistent with the health, safety, and aesthetic objectives of the City.
ANALYSIS
Intent of the Ordinance
It is the City's belief that vendors offer the citizens of the community an alternative service.
Further, it is the intent of this Ordinance to promote public interest by contributing to an active
pedestrian environment. The Vendor's Ordinance will allow for stands (i.e. pushcarts,
wagons, etc.) to be located in areas that will safely accommodate the use by not interfering
with pedestrian circulation and access or vehicle circulation or parking.
Locational Characteristics
Locations for vending in the City shall be approved by the Director of Planning. There should
be at least 200 square feet of useable or recognizable plaza or courtyard area for each
permitted outdoor vending cart. The area should be free of all obstructions within a six foot
perimeter of the stand. All vending locations shall be on privately owned, developed,
commercial property within City limits. Vending locations may change only upon written
request by an applicant and approval of the Director of Planning.
Aoolication Issuance and Fees
Within, but no later than 30 days after filing of a completed application for a vendor's license,
the applicant shall be notified of the decision on the issuance or denial of the license. Fees
shall be determined by Resolution of the City Council and shall be paid with the submission
of an application.
R:~STAFFRFT~VENDOR.PC 2116/95 Idb 2
Term and Renewal
All vendor's licenses shell be valid for one year unless revoked or suspended prior to
expiration. An application to renew a license shall be made not later than 60 days before the
expiration of the current license. License fees and renewal procedures shall be established in
accordance with the Business License Registration Program procedures outlined in the
Municipal Code.
Prohibited Conduct end Hours of Ooeretion
The Ordinance regulating vendors has specific restrictions (reference Section 7 of the
Ordinance). These restrictions relate to the following: hours of operation; storage of the
vending cart; trash control; sale of items; solicitation with persons in motor vehicles; and
noise.
Enforcement
The Ordinance allows for the denial, suspension or revocation of a vendor's license in cases
of fraud or misrepresentation; public health, safety and welfare; and conduct which is contrary
to the Ordinance.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
A Negative Declaration was prepared for this Ordinance which found no significant impacts
as · result of the adoption of this Ordinance.
SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS
It is the intent of the City of Temecule to establish an Outdoor Vending Ordinance to promote
the public interest by contributing to an active pedestrian environment. It is further the intent
of the Ordinance to regulate outdoor vending in order to protect the public health, safety and
welfare. This Ordinance provides a mechanism whereby vendors may legally operate within
the City limits on privately owned, developed, commercial property.
FINDINGS
1. Vendors offer the citizens of the community an alternative service.
Vendors will promote the public interest by contributing to an active pedestrian
environment.
The action proposed is consistent with the General Plan Village Center policies which
call for pedestrian oriented uses.
The action proposed complies with all other applicable requirements of state law and
local ordinances.
R:'~STAFF!qPI'~VENDOFLPC 2116/96 klb 3
Attachments:
Ordinance No. 94- - Blue Page 5
Resolution No. 94- - Blue Page 13
Initial Study- Blue Page 17
I~STAFFRPT~VENDOR. PC 2116/96 Idb 4
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
ORDINANCE NO. 94-
R:%STAFFRPI~VENDOR.PC 2/16/96 Idb 5
ORDINANCE NO. 94-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA PERTAINING TO OI.rIIN3OR VENIX)RS
AND ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS FOR OUTDOOR
VENDING
WItERE~,S, the City Council of the City of Temecula hereby finds that Outdoor
Vending on private property promotes public interest by contributing to an active pedestrian
environment, and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Temecula further finds that reasonable..
regulation of outdoor vending is necessary to protect the public health, safety, and welfare.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Fintllngs. That the Temecula City Council hereby makes the following
findings:
A. The planning agency and City Council find, in approving projects, adopting land
use reguhtions, and taking other actions, each of the following:
1. That the regulations of outdoor vending activities set forth herein are
consistent with the General Plan foecause the action proposed is consistent with the General Plan
Village Center policies which call for pedestrian oriented uses).
2. The proposed use or action complies with all other applicable requirements
of state hw and local ordinances.
Section 2. "Purpose. The purpose of this Chapter is to set forth the development
standards for the siting of outdoor vendors within the City limits. The purpose of these
standards is to ensure that the design and location of these vendors are consistent with the health,
safety, and aesthetic objectives of the City.
It is a desire of the City that the design of this community be of the highest quality, that
new development be architecturally distinctive as well as homogeneous in design, and that
accessory facilities be compatible with the overall theme of the community.
Recognizing that outdoor vendors offer the citizens of the community an alternative
service, the regulations of this Chapter are enacted to:
A. Promote public interest by contributing to an active pedestrian environment;
R:%STAFFRI:rI~VENDOR.PC 2116/95 Idb 6
B. Set forth the conditions and requirements under which outdoor vendors may be
permitted to operate on private property.
Section 3. Def'mition.. For purposes of this Chapter, the following words, terms,
phrases, and their derivations, 'shall have the meanings given herein. Then, consistent with the
context, words used in the present tense singular include the plural.
A. 'Applicant' means any person who seeks to obtain a vending license pmuant to
the procedures and requirements of this Chapter.
B. 'Outdoor Vending License' means a license obtained pursuant to the procedures
and requirements of this Chapter which permits a vendor to sell food or merchandise from a
vending stand on private property subject to the limitations of this Chapter and any other
applicable laws.
C. 'Outdoor Vendor' means any person who sells food or merchandise from a
rending stand.
D. 'Private Property' means privately owned, developed, commercial property within
the City limits.
E. 'Pushcart' means any device designed to be moved by human power, including,
but not limited to, wagons, or other wheeled containers or conveyances.
F. 'Vending' means the sale of food or merchandise from a vending stand operating
on private p~ within the City limits.
G. 'Vending Stand' means a pusheart, wagon, or any other wheeled vehicle or device
which may be moved without the assistance of a motor or which may be towed by motor vehicle
to the outdoor vending location and is used for the disphying, storing, or wansporting of articles
offered for sale by an outdoor vendor.
Section 4. License and AllVlication
A. Licensing. It shall be unlawful to sell, or offer for sale, any food, beverage, or
merchandise from a vending stand on any private property within the City limits without first
obtaining an Outdoor Vending License. Existing businesses which legally operate outdoor
disphys of merchandise prior to the adoption of this Chapter, are not required to obtain an
Outdoor Vending License for a period of one year from adoption of the Ordinance.
B. Apl)lication. The application for an Outdoor Vending License shall be signed by
the applicant and shall include the following:
1. The name, home, and business address of the applicant, and the name and
address of the owner (if other than the applicant) of the vending stand to be used in the operation
of the vending business.
R:~STAFFRPT~VENDOR.PC 2/16]95 Mb 7
2. A description of the type of food, beverage, or merchandise to be sold.
3. A description and photograph (including signage and colors) of any
vending stand to be used in the operation of the business.
4. A site plan delineating the location of the vending stand.
Section ~. Imanee and Fees.
A. Not hter than thirty (30) days after the filing of a completed application for an
Outdoor Vendlag License, the applicant shall be notified of the decision on the issuance or denial
of the Outdoor Vending License.
1. Fees shall be established by Resolution'of the City Council and shall be.
paid prior to issuance of an Outdoor Vendlag License.
2. Licenses to vend outdoor within the City limits shall be reviewed and
approved by the Director of Planning in conjunction with the Business License Registration
Program, Building and Safety, and Public Works Departments.
3. There should be at least two-hundred square feet (200 sq. ft.) of useable
or recognizable plaza or courtyard area for each allowed rending stand. The rending stand
should be free of all obstructions within a six foot (6') perimeter.
4. Locations for vending in the City shall be approved by the Planning
Director. Vending locations shall be designated based on the ability of the site to safely
accommodate the use by not interfering with pedestrian circ~tion and access or vehicle
circulation or parking. The Planning Director may require that the vending stand be removed
from the location and stored out of public view when not in use.
5. Vendlag locations may change only upon written request by an applicant
and/or Outdoor Vending Licensee and approval of the Director of Planning.
in this Chapter.
All vendlag locations shall be on private property as previously defined
Section 6. Term and Renewal.
A. All Outdoor Vending Licenses are valid for one year unless revok~ or suspended
prior to expiration. An application to mew an Outdoor Vending License shall be made not
later than sixty (60) days before the expiration of the current Outdoor Vending License. License
fees and renewal procedures shall be established in accordance with the Business License
Registration Program procedures outlined in this Cede.
R:~,STAFFIqPT%VENDOR.PC 2116/95 Idb 8
Section 7.
A. It
conditions:
Prohibited Conduct and Hours of O!~erntion.
shall be prohibited for any vendor to operate under any of the foBowing
1. Operate between 10:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. of the following day unless in
conjunction with a special event as set forth in Ordinance No. 348, Section 19.51.
2. Leave any vending stand unattended.
3. Store, park, or leave any vending stand within any public right-of-way or
on any undeveloped or otherwise vacant property.
4. Sell food or beverages for immediate consumption unless there is a litter
receptacle available nearby for public use.
5. Leave any location without first picking up, removing, and disposing of
all trash or refuse remaining from sales made from the vending stand.
6. Allow any items relating to the operation of the vending business to be
placed anywhere other than in, or under the-vending stand.
7. Set up, maintain, or permit the use of any additional table, crate, carton,
rack, or other device to increase the selling or display capacity of the vending stand where such
additional items have not been approved by the Director of Planning.
8. Solicit or conduct business with persons in motor vehicles.
9. Sell anything other than that which the Outdoor Vending License permits.
10. Sound or permit the sounding of any device which produces a loud and
mucous noise, or use or operate any loud speaker, public address system, radio, sound
amplifier, or similar device to attract the attention of the public.
Section 8. Vendinl, Stand Requirements.
A. Every applicant shall submit a photograph or drawing of the vending stand to be
used for review during the application approval process, showing materials, colon, and signage.
B. No vending stand shall exc~d- four feet (4') in width, six fe~t (6') in length, and
eight feet (8') in height.
Section 9. Safety Requirements.
A. All vending stands in or from which food is prepared or sold shah comply with
the following requirements:
R:~STAFFRPT~VENDOR. PC 2116/95 kib 9
1. All equipment installed in any pan of the vendinn stand shall be secured
in order to prevent movement during transit and to prevent detachment in the event of a collision
or overttim.
2. All utensils shall be stored in order to prevent their being hurled about in
the event of a sudden stop, collision, or overturn. A safety knife holder shall be provided to
avoid loose storage of knives.
3. Compressors, auxiliary engines, generators, batteries, battery chargers, gas
fueled water heaters, and similar equipment shall be installed so as to be hidden from view to
the extent possible and be easily accessible.
SeCtion 10. D_hl~v of Outdoor Vendinl l ,ieense.
A. All Outdoor Vendinn Licenses shall be displayed in a visible and conspicuous
location at all times during the operation of the vendinn business.
Seelion 11. Advert|.~in~.
A. No advertising, except the posting of prices, shall be permiRed on any vendinn
stand, except to identify the name of the product or the name of the vendor.
Seelion 12. Denial. Sn~pen,~ion. and Revocation.
A. Any Outdoor Vendinn License my be denied, suspended, or revoked in
accordance with the procedures contained in this Cede for any of the following causes:
1. Fraud or misrepresentation contained in the application for the Outdoor
Vendinn License.
2. Fraud or misrepresentation made in the course of carrying on the business
of vendinn.
3. Conduct of the licensed business in such a manner as to create a public
nuisance, or constitute a danger to the public health, safety, welfare, or morals.
4. Conduct which is contrary to the provisions of this Chapter.
B. Any person wishing to appeal any denial, suspension, 'or revocation of an Outdoor
Vendinn License my do so, pursuant to the authority and procedures of Chapter 2.36 of this
Code.
Seelion 13. Penalty for Violation
A. Any w'olafion of any of the requirements of this Chaptex shall be an infraction and
any violator may be punished pursuant to Section 1.20 et seo_. of this Code.*
R:t, STAF~VENDOR, PC 2118/95 klb 10
Section 14. If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion
of this Ordinance, is for any reasons held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any
court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining
portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this
Ordinance, and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion
thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions,
sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions thereof be decbred invalid or unconstitutional.
Section 15. The City Clerk shall cause this Ordinance to be appropriately codi~ed in
the Municipal Code.
Section 16. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its
passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. The City Clerk shall
publish a summary of this Ordinance and a certified copy of the full text of this Ordinance shall.
be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five days prior to the adoption of this
Ordinance. Within 15 days from adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall publish a
summary of this Ordinance, together with the names of the Councilmembers voting for and
against the Ordinance, and post the same in the office of the City Clerk.
R:~STAFFRPT'%VENDOR.PC 211e/95 Idb 11
day of ,19
Section 17. PASSED AND APPROVED this
RON ROBERTS
MAYOR
A'ITEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Gregory G. Diaz, Assistant City Attorney
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
CITY OF TEMEC~
I, , City Clerk of the City of , do
hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. was regularly introduced and placed
upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the day of
,19 . That thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a
regular meeting of the City Council on the day of , 19 ., by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES: COUNC~ERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:
R:~STAFFRPT~VENDOR.PC 211e/gS Idb
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
RESOLUTION NO. 94.-
R:%STAFFRPT'~,VENDOR.PC 2/16/95 klb 13
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
RESOLUTION NO. 94-36
A RESOLIH'ION OF THE PLANNING COMRgtgSION OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING APPROVAL
OF CITY OF TEMECULA VENDOR'S ORDINANCE.
WHERIP-&S, THE CITY OF TEIVIECULA prepared the Vendor's Ordinance in
accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Riverside County Land Use and
Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference;
WHEREAS, The Vendor's Ordinance was processed in the time and manner prescribed
by State and local hw;
VV!~ER~, the Phnning Commission considered the Vendor' s Ordinance on November
7, 1994, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time interested persons
had an opportunity to testify either in support or in opposition;
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and
arguments, if any, of all penons deserving to be heard, the Commission considered sll facts
relating to the Vendor's Ordinance;
NOW, THEREI~RE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
Section 2. Findinffs.
A. The Planning Commission in recommending approval of the City of Temecula's
Vendor's Ordinance, makes the following findings, to wit:
1. Vendors offer the citizens of the community an alternative service.
2. Vendors will promote the public interest by contributing to an active
pedegai~ environment.
3. The action proposed is consistent with the General Plan Village Center
policies which call for pedestrian oriented uses.
4. The action proposed complies with all other applicable requirements of
state hw and local ordinances.
R:~,STAFFRFT'~VENDOR.PC 211e/95 Idb 14
B. The Planning Commission in appmving the certification of the Negative
Declaration of environmental impact under the provisions of the California Environmental
Quality Act, specifically finds that the approval of this Conditional Use Permit will have a di
minirnis impact on fish and wildlife resources. The Planning Commission specifically finds that
in considering the record as a whole, the project involves no potential adverse effect, either
individually or cumulatively, on wildlife as the same is defined in Section 711.2 of the Fish and
Game Code. This is based on the fact that this all vendors will be located on improved
commercial property. The Planning Commission further finds that the City of Temecula is the
project proponent and the site is located Citywide, Temecula, California. Furthermore, the
Planr~ng Commission finds that an initial study has been prepared by the City Staff and
considered by the Planning Commigsion which has been the basis to evaluate the potential for
adverse impact on the environment and forms the basis for the Planning Commission's
determma'tion, including the information contained in the public hearing records, on which a
Negative Declaration of environmental impact was issued and this di minimis finding is made.
In addition, the Planning Commission finds that there is no evidence before the City that the
proposed project will havc any potential for an adverse effect on wildlife resources, or thc
habitat on which the wildlifc depends. Finally, the Planning Commission finds that the City has,
on the basis of substantial evidence, rebutted the presumption of adverse effect contained in 14
California Code of Regulations 753.5(d). -
Section 3. Environmental Compliance. An Initial Study prepared for this project
indicates that the proposed project will not have a significant impact on the environment and a
Negative Declaration, therefore, is hereby granted.
Section 4. Not Applicable,.
R:~STAFFRPT~VENDOR.PC 2/16/95 klb '~ S
Section $. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 5th day of December, 1994.
STEVEN I. FORD
I tlERERY CERTIFY that the foregoing Re.~lution was duly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 5th day of
December, 1994 by the following vote of the Commission:
AYES: 4 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: FORD, FAHEY, SLAVEN AND
WEBSTER
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 1
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
BLAIR
GARY THORNHILL
SECRETARY
R:~STAFFIqP'RVENDOI=LPC 2/16/116 k. ib 16
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
INITIAL STUDY
R:~.STAFFRFI'%VENDOFLPC 211e/95 klb 17
City of Temecula
Planning Department
Initial Environmental Study
I. BACKGROUND INFORMATION
2.
3.
4.
Name of Project:
Case Numbers:
Location of Project:
Description of Project:
5. Date of Environmental
Assessment:
Name of Proponent:
Address and Phone
Number of Proponent:
Vendor's Ordinance
N~A
City Wide
An Ordinance to address transient and road side vending within City
limits.
October 19, 1994
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California 92590
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
(Explanations to all the answers are pwvided in Section
Yes No
1. Earth. Will the proposal result in:
a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes geologic substructures? _ _ X
b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction, or over covering
of the soil? __ __ X
c. Change in topography or ground surface relief futures? __ __
d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique
geologic or physical features? -- --
e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on
or off the site? -- --
f. Changes in siltation, deposition or erosion? __ __
g. The modification of any wash, channel, creek, river or lake? _ _
Maybe
R:~STAFFRI~VENDOR.PC 2116/95 k. lb 18
Yes Maybe
2. Air.
a.
b.
C.
Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as
earthquakes, landslides, mudslides, liquefaction, ground
fa~ure, or similar hazards?
Any development within an Al~qujst-Priolo Special Studies Zone?
Will the proposal result in:
Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality?.
The creation of objectionable odors?
Alteration of air movement, temperature, or moisture or any
change in climate, whether locally or regionally?
Water. Will the proposal result in:
Changes in currents, or the come or direction of water
movements, in either marine or fresh waters?
Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and
amount of surface runoff?.
c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waten?
Change in the amount of surface Water in any water body?.
Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface
water quality, including but not limited w, temperature,
dissolved oxygen or turbidity?
f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters?
Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct
additions, withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer
by cuts or excavations?
Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public
water supplies?
Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such
as flooding?
4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in:
Change in the diversity of species, or number of any native
species of plants (including trees,- shrubs, grass, crops, and
aquatic plants)?
X
X
X
X
X
X
R:XSTAFFRPT~VENOOR.laC 2/16/95 Idb 19
Yes Mayb~ No
Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, threatened, or
endangered species of plants? --
c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area of native
vegetation, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of
existing species? --
d. Reduction in the acreage of any agricultural crop? --
Animal Life. Will the proposal result in:
a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of
animals (animals includes all land animals, birds, reptiles, fish,
amphibians, shellfish, benthic organisms, and/or insects)? _
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, threatened, or
endangered species of animals?
c. The introduction of new wildlife species into an area? __
d. A barrier to the migration or movement of animals? __
e. Deterioration to existing fk~h or wildlife habitat?. --
Noise. Will the proposal result in:
a. Increases in existing noise levels7 --
b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels?
c. Exposure of people to severe vibrations? --
Light and Glare. Will the pwposal produce or result in light or glare?
Land Use. Will the proposal result in:
a. Alteration of the present land use of an area? X
b. Alteration to the future p|,nned land use of an area as described
in a community or general plan? --
Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in:
a. An increase in the rate of use of any natural resources?
b. The depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource?
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
R:~STAFFRF'I'~VmDOR.PC 2/le/ss klb 20
Yes Maybe No
Risk
a.
10. of Upset. Will the proposal result in:
A risk of an explosion or the release of any hazardous substances
in the event of an accident or upset conditions (hazardous
substances includes, but is not limits! to, pesticides, chemicals,
oil or radiation)?
b. The use, storage, tran~pon or disposal of any hazardous or toxic
materials (including, but not limited to oil, pesticides, chemicals,
or radiation)?
c. Possible interference with an emergency response plan or an
emergency evacuation plan?
11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density,
or growth rate of the human population of an area?
12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing or create a demand
for additional housing?
13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in:
a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement?
b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking7
c. Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems, including
public transportation?
d. Alterations to present panems of circulation or movement of
people and/or goods?
e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic?
f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or
pedestrians?
14. Public Serviees. Will the proposal have .substantial affect upon, or
result in a need for new or altered governxnental services in any of
the following areas:
a. Fire protection?
b. Police protection?
c. Schools?
d. Parks or other recreational facilities?
X
X
X_
X
X
X
X_
R:%STAFFRP'T%VENDOR.PC 2116/95 Idb 2 1 -.
Yes
e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? _
L Other governmental services: --
15. Ene*gy. Will the proposal result in:
a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? __
b. Substantial increase in demand upon existinf sources or energy,
or require the development of new sources of energy? __
16. Utilities. Will the proposal restfit in a need for new systems, or
substantial alterations to any of the following utilities:
a. Power or natural gas? --
b. CommvJnications systems? --
c. Water systems? --
d. Sanitary sewer systems or septic tanks? __
e. SWim water drainage systems? --
f. Solid waste disposal systems? --
g. Will the proposal result in a disjointed or inefficient pattern of
utility delivery system improvements for any of the above? _
17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in:
a. The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? _
b. The exposure of people to potential health hazards, including
the exposure of sensitive receptors (such as hospitals and
schools) to toxic pollutant emissions? __
18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in:
M ybe
X
X
X_
X
X
X
19.
a. The obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public? _
b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view?. _
c. Detrimental visual impacts on the surrounding area? __
Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or
quantity of existing recreational resources or opportunities? __
X
R:~STAFFRPT~VENDOP~PC 2116/95 Idb 22
Yes Maybe No
20.
Cultural Resources.
Will the proposal result in:
The alteration or destruction of any paleontologic, prehistoric,
archaeological or historic site?
Adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic
building, structure, or object?
Any potential to cause a physical change which would affect
unique ethnic cultural values?
Restrictions to existing religious or sacred uses within the
potential impact area?
X
X
X
R:~STAFFRPT~VENDOR.PC 2116/96 klb 23
HI. DISCUSSION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMAC'I~ ~
Earth
The proposal will not result in unstable earth conditions, changes in geologic substructures; disruptions,
displacement, compaction or ov~rcovexing of the soil; changes in topography; destruction, covering or
modification of any unique geologic or physical features; any increase in wind or water erosion of soils;
changes in silta~on, deposition or erosion; modification of any wash, channel, creek, river or lake. The
project(s) may result in the exposure of people to geologic hazards such as earthquakes since all of Southern
California subject to earthquake activity. No Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zones exist in the City. All
vendors will be located on commercial property that is fully improved. No sigm'~cant impacts are anticipated.
No mitigation is required.
Air
The proposal will not result in air emi~ions or .deterioration of ambient air quality; the creation of
objectionable odors, or any alteration of air movement, temperature or moisture, or any change in climate.
All vendors will be located on commercial property that is fully improved. No significant impacts will occur.
No mitigation is required.
Water
The proposal will not result in changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements; changes
in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff; alterations to the .course or
flow of flood waters; a change in the amount of surface water in any water body; discharge into surface
waters, or alteration of surface water quality; alteration of the direction or rate of flow of Found waters;
changes in the quantity of ground waters; reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public
water supplies; or exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding. All vendors will
be located on commercial property that is fully improved. No significant impacts will occur. No mitigation
is required.
Plant Life
The proposal will not result in a change in the diversity of species, or number of any native species of plants;
reduction in the numbers of any unique, rare, threatened, or endangered species of plants; introduction of new
species of plants into an area of native vegetation, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing
species; or a reduction in the acreage of any agricultural crop. All vendors will be located on commercial
property that is fully improved. No significant impacts will occur. No mitigation is required.
Animal Life
The proposal will not result in a change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals;
reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, threatened, or endangered species of animals; introduction of
new wildlife species into an area; a barrier to the migration or movement of animals; or deterioration to
existing fish or wildlife habitat. All vendors will be located in commercial areas that are fully improved. No
significant impacts will occur. No mitigation is required
R:%,STAFFRPT~VENDOR. PC 2n6/95 Idb 24
Noise
The proposal will not expose people to severe noise levels or vibrations. The proposal may result in increases
in existing noise levels. All vendors will be located on commercial property that is fully improved. Increases
in noise levels will be minimal due to the small size of the vending cart. Commercial areas are generally not
noise sensitive areas. All vendors will be located in commercial areas that are fully improved. No significant
impacts will occur. No mitigation is required.
Light and Glare
The project site is located within the Mount Palomar Observatory Special Lighting District. The lighting
standards within this district require that only low pressure sodium street and security lights be installed and
all other lighting must be oriented or shielded to reduce the glare in the night sky near the observatory.
Additional light and glare may result from the development of the site for a vendor. The impact of the
additional light and glare will be mitigated by following the standards of the Mount Palomar Observatory,.
Special Lighting District (Ordinance No. 6~5') and through the appropriate design of the lighting system. No
significant impacts will occur. No mitigation is required.
Land Use
The proposal will result in a minor alteration to the present land use of an area in that a vendor may be
introduced into a commercial shopping area. No alteration to the future planned land use of an area will
occur. All vendors will be located in commercial areas that are fully improved~ No significant impacts will
occur. No mitigation is required.
Natural Resources
The proposal will not result in the rate of use of any natural resources or the depletion of any nonrenewable
natural resource. All vendors will be located in commercial areas that are fully improved. No significant
impacts will occur. No mitigation is required.
Risk of Upset
The proposal will not result in a risk of an explosion or the release of any hazardous substances in the event
of an accident; the use, storage, transport or disposal of any hazardous or toxic materials; or possible
interference with an emergency response or evacuation plan. The vendors will not be dealing with hazardous
materials. All vendors will be located in commercial areas that are fully improved. No significant impacts
will occur. No mitigation is required.
Population
The proposal will not alter the location, distribution, density or growth rate of the human population of an
area. The size of the vending carts is of such a minor nature that it will not create impacts. No significant
impacts will occur. No mitigation is required.
R:~STAFFRPT~VENDOR.PC 2116/96 Idb
25
Housing
The proposal, due W its nature, will not affect existing housing or create a demand for additional housing.
All vendors will be located in commercial areas that are fully improved. No significant impacts will occur.
No mitigation is required.
Transi~ortation/Circulation
The proposal will not generate substantial additional vehicular movement; effect .existing parking facilities;
create a demand for new paricing; impact existing tt~an~portation systems, including public trn_~sportation; alter
present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods; alter waterborne, rail, or air traffic; or
increase traffic hazards. All vendors will be located in commercial areas that are fully improved. No
significant impacts will occur. No mitigation is required.
Public Services
The proposal will not have an effect on public services including fire, police, schools, parks or the
maintenance of any public facfiities. All vendors w~l be located in commercial areas that are fully improved.
No significant impacts wfil occur. No mitigation is required.
The proposal will not result in the use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy, 'substantially increase demand
upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy. All vendors will be
located in commercial areas that are fully improved. No significant impacts wfil occur. No mitigation is
required.
Utilities
The proposal will not result in the need for new systems or substantial alterations to power, communications
systems, water systems, sanitary systems, storm water drainage systems, or solid waste disposal systems. All
vendors will be located in commercial areas that are fully improved. No significant impacts will occur. No
mitigation is required.
Human Health
The proposal will not result in the creation of any health hazard or the exposure of people to potential health
hazards. All vendors will be located in commercial areas that are fully improved. No significant impacts will
occur. No mitigation is required.
Aesthetics
The proposal will not result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public or create an
aesthetically offensive site open to public view. Whfie the vending cans could possibly have detrimental visual
impacts on the surrounding area, the carts will be conditioned to be architecturally compatible with their
surroundings. All vendors will be located in commercial areas that are fully improved. No significant impacts
will occur. No mitigation is required.
R:%S'f'AFFilq~VENDOR.PC 21'~ems Mb 26
Recreation
The proposal will not result in an impact upon the' q~ality or quantity of existing recreational resources.
vendors will be located in commercial areas that are fully improved. No significant impacts will occur.
mitigation is required.
All
No
Cultural Resources
The proposal will not result in the alteration or destruction of any paleontologic, prehistoric, archaeological
or historic sites; adverse physical or aesthetic effects to prehistoric or historic buildings, structures or objects;
any potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values; or restrict existing
religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area. All vendors will be located in commercial areas that
are fully improved. No significant imp, acts will occur. No mitigation is required.
R:XSTAFFRPT~.VENDOR.PC 2116/95 Idb 27
IV. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
Does the project have the potential to either: degrade
the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish, wildlife or bird species, cause a fish,
wildlife or bird population to drop below self sustaining
levels, threaten to e,]iminnte a plant, bird or animal
species, or eliminate important examples 'of the major
periods of California history or prehistory?
Yes
Maltbe
X
Does the project have the potential to achieve short
term, w the disadvantage of long term, environmental
goals? (A abort term impact on the environment is one
which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of
time while long term impacts will endure well into the
future.)
X
Does the project have impacts which are individually
limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project's
impact on two or more separate resources may be
relatively small, but where the effect of the total of
those impacts on the environment is significant.)
Does the project have environmental effects which will
cause substantial adverse effects on human. beings,
either directly or indirectly?
X
V. DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME *DE MINIMUS" IMPACT FINDINGS
Does the project have the potential to cause any adverse effect,
either individually or cumulatively, on fish and wildlife resources?
Wildlife is defined as 'all wild animals, birds, plants, fish,
amphibians, and related ecological communities, including the
habitat upon which the wildlife depends on for it's continued
viability* (Section 711.2, Fish and Game Code).
Yes
No
X
R:~rAFFRPT~VENDOR.PC 211e/95 Idb 28
ENVIRONMENTAL DEfERMINATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I fred that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on
the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
X
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect
on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case
because the Mitigation Measures described on the attached sheets and
in the Conditions of Approval that have been added to the project will
mitigate any potentially significant impam to a leyel. of insignificance,
and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find .the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the
environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
Prepared by:
Signature Name and Ti~e
Date
R:~STAFRtq~VENDOR,PC 2116/96 Id~ 29
ITEM 15
TO.'
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROV
CITY ATTORNIR~
FINANCE OFFIC
CITY MANAGE
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning
February 28, 1995
School Mitigation Program Resolution
Prepared
David W. Hogan, Associate Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
It is requested that the City Council ADOPT the attached resolution entitled:
"A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING THE SCHOOL FACILITY IMPACT MITIGATION PROGRAM"
BACKGROUND
During development of the City General Plan, the"Temecula Valley Unified School District
requested that the City of Temecula require residential developers to fully mitigate the impact
of new development on school facilities. In response to their request, the City Council
included language in the Growth Management and Public Facilities Element stating that if
Proposition 170 failed to win voter approval in the November 1993 Election, the City would
establish a school mitigation resolution. A copy of the school facility related General Plan
Implementation Measures are included in Attachment No. 3.
The Resolution attached to this Agenda Report is the enabling legislation that authorizes the
School District to submit a mitigation plan to the City. A copy of the proposed School
Mitigation Resolution is included in Attachment No. 1. This item was continued from the
February 14, 1995 meeting to allow the School District and area residential development
companies an opportunity to discuss this issue and arrive at some form of consensus or
compromise.
DISCUSSION
Representatives of the City and the Temecula Valley Unified School District have been working
together since December 1993 to develop the attached resolution. The attached school
mitigation program will do the following:
Authorize the School District to prepare and submit a Mitigation Plan that addresses
the impacts on school facilities;
R:~"TA~HOLMIT.CC2 2/21/96 dwh 1
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
RESOLUTION NO. 95-
R:'tSTAF~Ot. MIT.CC2 2/21/95 dwh 3
WItERE/SiS, the City, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"),
has the authority to review development proposals for impacts on School Facilities; and
WFrEREA,q, pursuant to decisions reached in Mitt Devehlpment Corporation v. City of
San Diego, 205 Cal. App. 3d 1201 (1988), William S.. l~art I-Iigh School District v. Regional
Planning Co_mntissiotl, 226 Cal. App. 3d 1612 (1991), and Murrieta V~lley Unified School
Digrict v. County of Riverside, 228 Cal. App. 3d 1212 (1991) interpreting the School Facilities
Law of 1986, the City has the authority to condition legislative acts including general plan
amendments, specific plans and amendments thereto, and changes of zone, if it finds that the
impacts on school facilities have not been mitigated to a level of insignificance; and
WI~rEREAS, the provision of a quality school system to educate the residents of the City
of Tcmecula is important to the City's future; and
WInmE~S, the Temecula Valley Unified School District requested that the City of
Temecuh adopt a resolution providing creating a program to provide full funding for school
facilities from some types of development; and
WHEREAS, the City Council included language in the Growth Management and Public
Facility Element of General Plan concerning the mitigation of school facility impacts; and
Wt~a~AS, this Resolution is being adopted at the request of the District which has
agreed to indemnify and hold harmless the City from claims resulting from the adoption,
enforcement, or implementation of the Resolution; and
WItEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered the Program and recommends
that the Council approve this ~Eimion at its November 7, 1994 meeting; and
WIr~EA~, notice of the proposed resolution was posted at City Hall, County Library,
Rancho California Branch, the U.5. Pust Office, and Temecuh Valley Chamber of Commerce.
NOW, THEI~EFORE, ~ CITY COUNCIL FOR ~ CITY OF TEMECULA
DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOt.IK)WS:
Section 1. Mitigation of School Facility Impacts
A. Except as pwvided below, all development projects and applications that are
submitted to the City of Temecula and that require a General Plan amendment, zone change,
development agreement, pre-annemtion agreement or Specific Plan appwval or amendment
shall be reviewed for their potential school facility impacts and mifEatlon of such impacts.
B. No conditions of appwval on General Plan amendment, zone change, development
agreement, pre-annexation agreeram or Specific Plan approval or amendment shall require any
applicant or developer to provide mitigation in excess of the mounts authorized by Government
Code Section 65995 unless a School District Mitigati.'on Plan ("Mitigation Plan") has been
prepared by or on behalf of the District and approved by the City Council.
R:\$TAFFRFI'~SCHOLMIT.CC2 2/21/96 dwh 5
8. Any amendments to an approved specific plan or tract map that changes
only the layout of the project, make minor changes to design and development standards, or
make other administrative changes and does not increase the total number of residential housing
units in the project.
Section 3. Preparation of School Facility Impact lV~tigation Plans
A. The Mitigation Plan sbnll conthin documentation of the need for any level of
mitigation that exceeds the total of revenue anticipated to be received by the school from
Statutory School Fees and any other sources of funding available to or anticipated by the
District. The Mitigation Plan shall be adopted by the District Board of Trustees. At a minimum,
all Mitigation Plans shall contain the following information:
1. Student Generation Factors.
a household survey.
high school grades.
a. The District Student Generation Factor (SGF) shall be based upon
The SGF shall include peak student loading for all elementary, middle and
following:
The SGF Household Survey shall be based upon and consist of the
(1) A minimum random sample of 250 dwelling units that were
constructed in the preceding three years.
(2)
characteristics of the community,
characteristics of the community.
A representative sample of the current or anticipated future
including consideration for any resort or second home
(3) The survey slmll exclude senior citizen housing.
(4) A representative sample of the homing product types within
the district (i.e. single family detached, single family attached, or multi-family. rental properties and
mobile homes).
(5) The SGF shall-be based on an assessment of student "pass
through" from new homes over at least a five-year period.
c. The District may propose additional survey factors and conditions
to be included in the survey. The use of any additional survey factors and condition (that could
affect the SGF) must be approved by the City' s Director of Planning prior to doing the survey.
2. Typical School Land Cost Factors
a. The Typical School Land Costs Factor CFSF) shall be based on the
Statc's standard cost and shall be based upon a finished and improved, construction ready school
site, including the extension of necessary infrastructure.
R:~,ST~HOLMIT.CC2 2/21/95 dwh 7
'~" 6. Level of Sul~port From New Development
The Mitigation Plan may pwvide for total mitigation school facilities
impacts that arc shown to result from new residential developments from all potenti:d funding
sources. The Mitigation Plan shall not be used to provide for mitigation of impacts attributable
to existing development.
7. Coordination of Plsnninl, Review for School Site DevelOpment.
The Mitigation Plan shah include provisions for consultations between the
Distria and the City on school facility location and site development plans, in order to promote
compatibility with City land use, circulation, and other plans, and coordination on public
improvements, including streets, sidewalks, and traffic control mech~nigm~.
B. The District shah submit its adopted Mitigation Plan to the City for its review and
approval as to whether it conforms to these requirements and could reasonably mitigate the
additional impacts on the District sdmol facilities. Upon submittal of the Mitigation Plan to the
City the following procedures shall be followed:
1. The District shall submit the adopted Mitigation Plan to the Director of
Planning. The submittal shah be accompanied by fee to cover the City's cost of reviewing the
District's plan.
2. Within 30 days foBowing receipt of the District' s Mitigation Plan, the
Director of Planning shall review the plan to determine whether it conforms to the requirements
of this Section. After reviewing the Mitigation Plan, the Director shall take one of the following
actions:
a. Notify, by written notice to the superintendent of the District, that
the Mitigation Plan conforms to ~e requirements of this Resolution. The notice shall also
contain the anticipated meeting date for the plnnning Commission's consideration of the
Mitigation Plan.
b. Notify, in writing, the superintendent of the District that the
District's Mitigation Plan does not conform to the requirements of this Section and describing
the deficiencies that need to be coxzectni. Any major changes in the District's Mitigation Plan
must be approved by the DisU*ict's Board of Trustees.
3. Within 60 days foUowing the Director of Pinnnlng'S notification of the
completeness of.the District's ~iga~on Plan, the Planning Commission shall review and
consider the plan to determine whe~ller it conforms to the requirements of this Section and will
reasonably mitigate the impacts of m~w development on school facilities. After considering the
Mitigation Plan, the Commlssio~ shall recommend that the City Council approve, deny,
condition, or continue the approval of the District's Mitigation Plan.
R:~STAFFRPT~CHOLMIT.CC2 2/21/96 dwh 9
B. All residential development proposals that do not require a General PLan
amendment, zone change, development agreement, pre~annexation agreement, or Specific Phn
approval or amendment by the City shall be reviewed for their pote~tinl impact on school
facilities as pan of the Initial Ellvilx}nmolltal Study process. Nothing in this resolution restricts
the ability of the Director of Planning to determine that an otherwise exempt residential project
may have a significant impact on the environment and that an Environmental Impact Report
should be prepat~. No mitigation of school impacts beyond the mitigation identified in State
law will be required for these projects.
C. All residentis! development propo~ that require General Plan amendments,
Specific Plans, Specific Plan amendments, development agreements, pre-annexation agreements,
and changes of zone shah be reviewed for their potentinl impact on school facilities and the
environment and the mitigation of those impacts in accordance with the requirements of State
and Local law.
1. If a School Facility Impact Mitigation Agreement is required and an
Agreement has not been submitted, the Director of Planning shah notify the applicant that the
application is incomplete and that additional information (i.e. special study or elwironmental
impact report) is required to assess the impacts on and mitigation of the effects of the
development project on the DisU'ict's school facilities.
2. Within 30 days of the submitting an application, the Director of Planning
shall notify the applicant that either:
a. The proposed development project will not have a significant
adverse impact on the District's school facilities or the environment, and that no additional
special studies or supplemental mitigation agreement is required.
b. The proposed development project will not have a significant
adverse impact on the District's school facilities, but may have art adverse impact on the
envirooment and that a special study or environmental impact ~ is required.
c. The proposed development project could have an adverse impact
on the District's school facilities and that a detailed impaa assessment and mitigation study must
be prepared and/or a School Facility Impact Mitigation Agreement must be obtained.
d. The proposed development project could have an adverse impact
on the District's school facilities and/or the env'n'onment, and that a special study or an
environmental impact report must be prepared and/or an Impact Mitigation Agreement is
required.
e. The proposed development project will have an adverse impact on
the District' s school facilities and the environment and that a special study or an environmental
impact report must be prepared.
R:'~rI"AFFRPT',SCHOLMIT.CC2 2./21/SS dwh 11
1. District agrees that any claim, action, proceeding, etc., brought against the
City which challenges the method of calculation of impact on school facilities in excess of that
stamtorily mandated shall be the full and complete responsibility of the District. To that end,
the District shall indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless the City against any loss, cost,
expense, claim, damage, settlement, or judgment, resulting from a lawsuit or any part thereof,
pertaining to the mount or method of calculation of such impact.
2. The City and District agree to share the cost on 50-50 basis of any action,
challenge, claim, demand, or other legal proct~in~ brought against the City based upon the
authority of the City to impose school miU'gation in excess of that required by State law.
Section 6. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution.
Section 7. PASSED, APPROVE]), AND ADOFFED this 14th day of February, 1995.
JEFFREY E. STONE
MAYOR
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CAI-I!~ORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TIEMECULA
I HERI~,Ry CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City
Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 14th day of February,
1995 by the following vote of the City Council:
COlINCH -MEMBERS
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNTERS
COUNCnMItMBERS
R:XSTAFF~OI..MIT.CC2 2121/95 dwh 13
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
R:~"TAFF~HOLMIT.CC2 2/21/96 dwh 14
Establish a procedure for the Council's review and approval of a proposed
Mitigation Plan; and,
Establish procedures on how the approved Mitigation Plan will be implementeo
by the City.
The proposed program was provided to, and reviewed by, the Temecula-Murrieta Coordinating
Committee at their August 19, 1994 and September 2, 1994 meetings. The Coordinating
Committee had no comments on the proposed Program.
GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY
The proposed resolution would establish the school facility impact mitigation program outlined
in Implementation Measure C.3 of the Growth Management and Public Facilities Element. As
a result, adoption of the proposed program is consistent with the a0opted City General Plan.
A copy of the school facility related General Plan Implementation Measures are included in
Attachment No. 2.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
The proposed resolution does not have the potential to cause a significant and adverse impact
on the environment. Therefore, the Director of Planning has determined that the project is
exempt from California Environmental Quality Act, pursuant to Section 15061 (b)(3) of the
CEQA Guidelines.
Attachments:
1. PC Resolution No. 94- - Blue Page 3
2. Growth Management/Public Facility Element Implementation Measure C.3 - Blue Page 14
R:L%'TAF1;It.R'L~OLMIT.I~C 10/13/94 Ir. lb 2
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
MINUTES FROM THE NOVEMBER 7, 1994 MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
R:%STAF~CHOLMIT,CC2 2/21/95 dwh 15
pT-ANNI'N6 CO;'~fMISSION I',i'I'NYJTF-~; Noven-:~er 7. 1994
/m----l
Chairwan Ford r, q3mssed concern that the Commission did not receive a copy of :he
County Resolution 93-13 I.
Chairman Ford stated that he did not see a provision for an annual review. He
further stated that there was no joint nmendment clause, no recision, no suspension,
no supersede clause or subsequent clause. City Amy Diaz stated this is an
agreement not a contract and these features are not normally necessary. Chairman
Ford x?.iterated his concern and stated that the object was to structure an agreement
between the City and School District for a common good, and an anntlal review
should he inchIdeal in the agreemenL lVIr. Diaz stated it conld he added with no
problem.
Chairman Ford opened the public he~ring at 8:09 P.M.
David G~ll~gher, lapl'(S{ntntive for Temecula Valley Unified School District
CrVUCD) came befor~ the Commission to answer any questions.
Dennis Chlni~ueff, Kernper Community Development, 27555 Ynez Road, Suite 202,
Temeafia, stated he wanted to work with the community and the School District to
ensure facilities are in place.
Phil Oberbnndsley with Lorenz, P, lhn6eff, Cannon, and Rose represen~g Kernper
Community Development, requested that the Commission drier action at this time, to.
a workshop to discuss the language to be used.
Mr. Larry Markham, xcptz.v=nting Johnson Machinery, requested a continuance until
they have had time to review the document
Mr. Dave C-~ll~ghq- stated that the mitigation plan requires the School District to
pursue all avenues of funding.
Commi-~sioner Fahey asked Mr. Gallagher about the sunounding taxes for both new
and old homes. Mr. C~11~gb.-r ~ that the home pays for the schools.
Commissioner Ford asked Mr. Gallagher if the School District would have a problem
with a yearly review of the mitigation. Mr. Gnll,gher suggested a review on a
project by project basis.
Commissioner Ford ask ff time District would he willing to forward a copy of the
mitigation agreement. Mr. C,~n~gher responded that the City has a copy of the
County agreement which is nearly idensic~!.
Chainnan Ford closed the lmblic hearing at 8:37 P.M.
R:~um~II0794.N..N 7
DRAFT
ATTACHMENT NO. 4
PUBLIC FACILITY ELEMENT IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES
R:'~STAFFRPT'q~,CHOIJVlIT.CC2 2121/95 dwh 16
ITEM 16
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Council
Mary Jane McLarney, Assistant City Manager
February 28, 1995
Contract for User Fee and Development Impact Fee Study
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council approve the contract with David M. Griffith and Associates
(DMG) to conduct a user fee and development impact fee analysis.
That the City Council appropriate $39,340 from General Fund fund balance to account
number 001 - 140-999-5248 (Consulting) to fund this contract·
BACKGROUND:
When the City incorporated, the City Council approved the County of Riverside's public
facilities fee schedule. To date, the City has been collecting Development Impact Fees per this
adopted ordinance (Ord. 659), as well as, collecting a public facilities fee deposit from
developers with the understanding that the deposit accounts would be reconciled when the
City adopts an updated development impact fee schedule. However, some developments pay
development impact fees pursuant to specific development agreements, which were adopted
by Council. The public facility, or development impact fee, is required to ensure that City
facilities and infrastructure will be adequate to meet the needs of future development in the
City.
The City also collects fees for services rendered in planning, building and safety, engineering
and recreation. A comprehensive user fee study should be conducted to ensure that the City
is not overcharging in compliance with A.B. 1660 or undercharging for services rendered as
well as provide a cost allocation plan for determining overhead costs. This is a requirement
for federal and state funding.
In 1992, a consulting firm was retained to conduct both a user fee and development impact
fee study. However, the consultant never delivered an acceptable product, therefore, it was
never adopted. By selecting the industry leader, David M. Griffith & Associates, Ltd., and
requiring a very detailed scope of work (attached) with accurate cost figures, staff is doing
everything possible to ensure that the City will have a defensible, accurate report on which
to base policy decisions relating to fees and charges.
R:~.Ah'~IDAWrAFF$.MI$ 2~21~
FISCAL IMPACT:
The total cost of this contract, including expenses of ~7,900, is not to exceed ~89,340. The
Finance Department has budgeted $50,000 for this project; therefore, $39,340 must be
requested from the General Unappropriated Fund balance into the Consulting Services account
#001-140-999-5248.
In addition, if the City Council chooses Alternative Bid 1 and/or 2, an additional appropriation
from fund balance of ~5,000to $15,000, will be required.
R:XLAItlEI. DA'SFAFFS.M~ 2'21/95
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
This Agreement was made and entered inW this 28th day of March, 1995, by and
between the City of Temecula ("City"), a municipal corporation, and David M. Griffith &
Associates. Ltd. (DMG) a Professional Services Firm for the Public Sector ("Consultant").
The parties hemto mutually agree as follows:
1. Services. Consultant shall perform the tasks set forth in Attachment A.
2. Performance. Consultant shall at all times, faith~lly, industrially and to the
best of his ability, experience 'and talent, perform all tasks described herein.
3. Payment. The City agrees to pay Consultant for actual work performed at the
rates set forth in Attachment A. This mount will not exceed $10,000 for the total term of
the Agreement unless additional payment is approved by the City Council; provided that the
City Manager may approve additional payment not to exceed $5,000.
Consultant will submit an invoice at the conclusion of actual services performed.
.Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of invoice.
4. Amendments. This Agreement may be amended so long as such amendment is
in writing and agreed upon by both the City Manager and Consultant.
5. Ownership Of Documents. Upon satisfactory completion of, or in the event of
termination, suspension or abandonment of, this Agreement, all original documents, designs,
drawings and notes prepared in the course of providing the services to be performed pursuant
to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City and may be used, reused or
otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission of the Consultant.
6. Termination. The City may terminate this Agreement without cause so long as
written notice of intent to terminate is given to Consultant at least three (3) days prior to the
termination date. In the event of termination, Consultant shall be paid for the services
performed.
R:IJd~IIERDAx. AGR-05'B.MI~
7. Indemnification. The Consultant agrees to defend, inde~nnify and save
harmless the City of Temecula, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and
against any and all claims, demands, losses, defense cost, or liability of any kind or nature
which the City, its officers, agents and employees may sustain or incur or which may be
imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of
Consultant's negligent acts or omissions under the terms of this Agreement, excepting only
liability arising out of the sole negligence of the City.
8. Status of Consultant. Consultant is an independent contractor in all respects in
the porfonnance of this Agreement and shall not be considered an employee of the City for
any purpose. No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the
performance of thi.~ Agreement.
Exc~t as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay ~laries, wages, or other
compensation to Consultant for performing services hereunder for City. City shall not be
liable for compensation or indemnifi~tion to Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of
performing services hereunder.
9. Term. This Agreement shall commence on February 28, 1995, and shall
remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later
than December 31, 1995.
10. Subcontracts. The Consultant shall not enter into any subcontracts for servict~s
to be rendered toward the completion of the Consultant's portion of thi.~ Agreement without
the consent of the City. At all times, Richard L. Pearl shall be primarily responsible for the
performance of the tasks described herein. Consultant shall provide City with fourteen (14)
days' notice prior to the departure of Richard L. Pearl. Joseph Colfan or Robert V. Reed
from Consultant's employ. Upon such notice, the City shall have the option to immediately
terminate this Agreement. Upon termination of this Agreement, Consultant's sole
compensation shall be for the value of service rendered to the City.
11. Default. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under the terms of
this Agreement, the City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating
Consultant for any work performed after the date of default. Default shall include not
performing the tasks described herein to the reasonable satisfaction of the City Manager of
the City. Failure by the Consultant to make pwgress in the performance of work hereunder,
if such failure arises out of causes beyond his control, and without fault or negligence of the
Consultant, shall not be considered a default.
written.
Consultant shall secure workers' compensation insurance.
Licenses. Consultant warrants that it maintains all necessary licenses.
The parties hereto have executed thk Agreement on the date and year above
CONSULTANT
By:
Title
A1TF_,ST:
By:
Ronald E. Bradley
city
June S. Greek, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
R:~LANI]~DA~AOR-0$A.MI~ 1/218S
DAVID M. GR~ & ASSOCIATES, LTD.
5715 Marconi Avenue, Suite A · Carmichael, CA 95608 · (916) 485-8 102 · Fax (916) 485-0111
Ms. Mary Jane Mc Larney
Assistant City Manager
City of Temecula
43 174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
February 14, 1995
Dear Ms. McLarnq,
This document consolidates our separately submitted original qualifications
statement, bid proposal, and time line for the user fee/development impact
fee study, and the parks and streets future operating expense analysis.
1. General Qu~ltfications
DMG was founded 19 years ago and has grown inW one of the largest
consulting firms in the nation in its
fields of specialty. Since 1975, we have
grown from a single office with five
employees to a firm of over 275
professional staff operating in 25 offices
throughout the United States. We
currently senre about one-half of the
state governments and over 1,500 local
governments including cities, counties,
and special districts. In California, we
have provided consulting services to all
58 counties and over 225 cities and
spedal districts.
DMG HIGHLIGHTS
=> Largest firm providing
management & fmancial
advice exclusively to local
government
=> Experienced in operating and
capital cost/
=> revenue environment.
::> Knowledgeable consultants
~ Results oriented
Our Western Region Office is headquartered in Sacramento
(Carmichael), California. We also have offices in Pasadena,
Cupertino, and Olympia, Washington. Our Western Region staff
includes 34 professionals. The Region serves clients in California,
Oregon, Washington, Nevada, Utah, and Hawaii.
The firm is organized around a limited number of services. The
philosophy of the fwrn has been to specialize in a few areas and do
them extremely well. Our Westem Region is led by Mr. J. Bradley
Wilkes and is organized around specific areas of service:
NORTH BROOK, ILLINOIS · CARMICHAEL, CALIFORNIA · RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA · IRVING, TEXAS · COLUMBUS, OHIO · ATLANTA, GEORGIA
DENVER, COLORADO" MIDLOTHIAN. VIRGINIA · OLYMPIA, WASHINGTON · PASADENA, CALIFORNIA · PHOENIX, ARIZONA · TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA
Cost o.f Service and User Fee, AB 1600 Development Impact Fee
Analysis, Operations knprovement, State Mandated Cost
Reitnbursement, Disaster Grants Consulting, Utility Rate Analysis,
Executive Search, and Human Resources.
Scope of Services and Deliverable Products
DMG will analyze the following areas:
Overhead calculation - produce indirect cost allocation plans
that: (1) conform to OMB A-87 guidelines for charging federal
and'state grants and (2) a Full Cost plan for charging user fee
applications and the redevelopment agency.
Operations f~s - all current and potential fees in: planning,
building & safety, engineering, and recreation. DMG will
design building and safety fees that will conform to the
C_~!ifornia State Attorney General's Opinion (92-506)
4 Development 4,~paet fees - transportation, drainage, parks,
and community facilities.
At the conclusion of the engagement, DMG will submit formal reports
on our findings and recommendations, and present same to the city
council and citizen/business groups.
DMG understands that the final goal of the project is passage of a
viable fee program. We are attuned to the political reality that local
government must operate in. While our analysis of costs are straight
fortyard and clearly defensible, fee recommendations are tempered
with potential realistic accomplishments. DMG studies are
exceptionally effective because they are .ac_c.e.p.t.a___bl_e_ to management,
the city council, and the comm..unity.
2
SECTION I
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES
A. SCOPE OF SERVICE
In general, this study will require the consultant to prepare a report
documenting the need for City facilities required to support future
development in Temecula, and to calculate impact fees that equitably
allocate the capital costs of those facilities to new development in
accordance with the requirements of AB 1600 {Government Code 66000, et
seq.), and with applicable constitutional requirements. DMG will also
provide assistance and samples of documents required for adoption and
implementation of the impact fee program.
The preparation of a development impact fee program involves organizing,
analyzing and interpreting data relating to the impacts of development on
capital facility and infrastructure needs in the City of Temecula. DMG will
base its analysis on information provided by the City or readily available
from other sources.
The impact fee study proposal is based on the following assumptions
regarding the scope of work:
The consultant's work does not include legal or appraisal services,
preparation of land use surveys, facility master plans, planning or
engineering studies, detailed cost estimates, or analysis of raw data.
2. Impact fees will be prepared for the following types of facilities:
Transportation Facilities
Drainage Facilities
Park and Recreation Facilities
Community Facilities {City Hall and Corporation Yard)
All impact fees will be calculated on a Citywide basis, or for a
service area.
single
The City will provide the consultant with data on existing and
planned land uses, development projections, facility standards and
master plans, existing facilities, and estimated facility costs.
Data, assumptions and policy decisions relied on by the consultant
will not change in the course of the study.
The proposed cost includes two presentations to the City Council,
community groups, trade groups or others as directed by the City.
Those presentations would be in addition to the routine site visits and
meetings with staff, and others, which would occur in the course of
preparing the study. If additional presentations are requested, they
will be billed on a time and expenses basis.
In the event that impact fees adopted by the City as a result of the
impact fee study are the subject of legal action, the consultant will
make appropriate staff available to support the City in defending
those fees.' HoWever, involvement in such a legal action is beyond the
scope of this proposal, and would be billed on a time and expenses
basis at the then, prevailing billing rates.
Information resources typically needed from the City in the preparation of
this type of study include the following:
Use, Circulation, Housing and
, General Plan, especially Land
Public Facilities elements
, Development policy documents, specific plans, EIR's or other
planning studies
· Existing land use surveys and statistics
· Census data and other demographic and economic studies
· Facility master plans and engineering studies
, Inventory of existing capital facilities and equipment
· Capital Improvement Program and current City Budget
· Base maps of the study area and facility service areas
B. WORK PROGRAM
The following work program outlines in general the technical approach to by
used by DMG in the completion of this study.
4
1. PREPARATION OF DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE PROGRAM
Task 1. Project Initiation
To initiate the engagement in a manner that will assure a clear
understanding by the consultants of the City's goals and expectations and
establish the working relationship required for timely and successful
completion of the study, the DMG project manager will meet with key City
staff at the inception of the project to discuss the Citys goals and objectives,
refine the scope, work plan and schedule, identify staff contacts and
information resources, and discuss impact fee methodologies.
TASK/CONSULT
RATE HOURS COST
$ $ $
TASK 1
Colgan 110 12 1,320
Chinn 85 0 0
SUBTOTAL 12 1,320
Task 2. Fami!l--ization
In the early stages of the work, the Project manager will become familiar
with existing City facilities as well as the geography, road system, physical
characteristics, development patterns, and general layout of the study area.
DMG consultants will also review available planning documents,
demographic data, economic projections, facility plans and other relevant
information, and consult with the staff, to become familiar with City policies
and information resources relevant to this project.
TASK/CONSULT RATE
TASK 2 $
Colgan 110
Chinn 85
SUBTOTAL
HOURS
$
COST
$
8 880
0 0
8 880
Task 3. Land Use Assumptions and Development Projections
Information on existing and projected land uses and development must be
organized and analyzed to provide a basis for calculating impact fees. DMG
will assemble and correlate relevant information on land uses, population,
housing, employment and traffic, and document planning assumptions (e.g.
average residential densities, persons per household, jobs per household,
floor area ratios, etc.) to be used in assessing development potential.
5
TASK/CONSULT RATE_ HOURS COST
TASK 3 $ $ $
Colgan 110 40 4,400
Chinn 85 0 0
SUBTOTAL 40 4,400
Task 4. Level of Service Standards.
DMG will review level-of-sezvice standards used in establishing facility
needs and inco_rporate them in the methodology used to calculate the
impact fees.
TASK/CONSULT RATE HOURS COST
TASK 4 $ $ $
Colgan 110 16 1,760
Chinn 85 16 1,360
SUBTOTAL 32 3,120
Task 5. Define Improvement Needs Related to Future Development.
DMG will assist the City to identify improvement needs related to future
development, and determine costs eligible for impact fee funding.
TASK/CONSULT RATE HOURS COST
TASK 5 $ $ $
Colgan 110 48 5,280
Chinn 85 24 2,040
SUBTOTAL 72 7,320
Task 6. Calculate Impact Fees and Prepaxe Documentation.
In order to calculate impact fees that comply with AB 1600, DMG will define
an al~propriate method of cost allocation for each type of facility, calculate
fees, document the justification for each type of fee, and prepare an impact
fee report. That report will include fee schedules, summary of development
potential, explanation of methodology, and documentation of a "reasonable
relationship" between the fees and the impacts of future development. A
draft of the impact fee report will be submitted for review by the City.
TASK/CONSULT RATE HOURS COST
TASK 6 $ $ $
Colgan 110 60 6,600
Chinn 85 40 3,400
SUBTOTAL 100 10,000
6
Task 7, Implementation Assistance.
DMG will assist the City in implementation of the impact fee program by
providing samples of adoption documents, and recommendations on
procedures for adoption, collection and expenditure of fees, capital
budgeting, indexing and updating of fees, and accounting and reporting
requirements under the Government Code.
TASK/CONSULT RATE HOURS COST
TASK 7 $ $ $
Colgan 110 16 1,760
Chinn 85 0 0
SU BTOTAL 16 1,760
Task 8. Public Meetings and Presentations.
DMG will attend public meetings and make presentations to the City
Council or other groups as requested by the City.
TASK/CONSULT RATE HOURS COST
TASK 8 $ $ $
Colgan 110 24 2,640
Chinn 85 0 0
SUBTOTAL 24 2,640
The total projected cost for the development impact fee component is shown
below:
TASK/CONSULT RATE HOURS COST
GRAND TOTAL 304 31,440
TOTAL HOURS
Colgan
Chinn
224
80
304
In addition to the professional fees noted above, expenses will be billed at
actual cost plus a 10% administrative fee. Total expenses will not exceed
$2,900.
7
The attached schedule shows estimated Completion times for Tasks 1-6.
Tasks 7 and 8 would be scheduled at the City's convenience.
Project Schedule
City of Temecula Impact Fee Study
TASK; 'Month I ~ ' Month 2 " Month 3
'~E'~"'~ .... ' ...........................................' ......' ...............................~ ........
Task 2
Task 4
ra,k s ". 0. L.. i.... :I l' ;..' I"0 '.!' '1 . I~.~.!
Task 6
__! .... Month 4
Notes 0 in schedule indicates meeting with City staff.
<> in schedule indicates submittal of technical memo or report at completion Of task.
8
E. STAFFING
The impact fee study will be staffed by consultants based in DMG's
SacramenW office. Specific staffing for this project is described below, and
resumes of assigned staff, are provided elsewhere in this proposal.
PROJECT DIRECTOR o As indicated in the previous section on the
Operations Fees and Charges Analysis, the project director for this study
will be Richard L Pearl. Mr. Pearrs qualifications and experience are
described in that section.
PROJECT MANAGER - Joseph Colgan, AICP. The Project Manager is
responsible for the day-to-day supervision of the engagement. The Project
Manager for the impact fee study will participate directly and extensively in
the analytical work and report preparation, and will coordinate the work
with City staff, and present the findings and recommendations of the study.
The Project Manager for the impact fee study will be Joe Colgan.
Mr. Colgan is a Project Manager in the Sacramento office of DMG. He is a
professional planner with more than ten years experience in local
government planning agencies, and has extensive experience in capital
facilities planning and financing. He has been preparing impact fee studies
under AB 1600 since 1989, and during that time has managed more than
fifteen impact fee engagements for clients in California, Oregon, Utah and
Florida. Mr. Colgan has presented workshops and lectures on development
impact fees, and has broad-based knowledge of impact fee methodology and
documentation.
PROJECT STAFF - Additonal staff support for the impact fee study will be
provided as required by an experienced staff of DMG consultants. The team
assigned W the operational fee analysis will provide support in the area of
budget analysis. In addition, an engineering specialist will be assigned to
support the analytical effort.
ENGINEERING SPECIALIST - Robert U. Reed, P.E. is a Project Manager in
the Sacramento office of DMG. Mr. Reed specializes in the areas of impact
fees and utility rate analysis. He has managed both impact fee and utility
rate studies, including projects for major clients such as the dties of Los
Angeles and Seattle. Mr. Reed will provide support in the interpretation of
facility master plans, and the evaluation of service standards as require in
this study.
SECTION II
COST ALLOCATION PLAN/USER FEE ANALYSIS
SCOPE
The DMG fee and charges analysis includes two distinct components:
a cost allocation plan, and the user fee (fee-for-service)analysis.
Cost allocation plan - indirect (support) costs
This analysis distributes central service and other administrative
support costs to the users of those services. Typical service providers
include finance, dry manager, purchasing, facility maintenance,
personnel, city attorney, etc. The list is sometimes expanded to
include departmental administration, i.e. public works
administration, community development administration, etc.
The objective of the analysis is to determine the full costs of providing
"line" services. Indirect overhead allocations identified in the cost
plan are distributed to program direct costs to determine full costs.
An added benefit of the DMG approach is that management can now
also see how much it costs to provide staff services. This information
may be helpful in addressing the issue of contract services: fleet, data
processing, maintenance, payroll, among others.
Other uses of the plan are (1) to charge indirect overhead to federal
and state grants and {2) to charge redevelopment agencies and
enterprise funds their fair share of support costs. Examples of grant
cost recovery areas are: CDBG, gas tax, and SB 90 state mandated
cost claiming.
User Fee Analysis
The purpose of a user fee study is to determine the full cost of services
offered by the agency for which user fees are currently being charged
or could be charged. The full cost is then compared to current
revenues to determine the amount of subsidy {or occasionally,
overcharge). With this knowledge decisions can be made concerning
appropriate fee adjustments. DMG can assist in understanding
economic issues such as elasticity of demand and can provide
information on what others are charging. However, in the final
analysis, the actual decision to increase or decrease fees is a local
decision.
10
At the conclusion of the above analysis DMG will prepare a report of
our findings and present fee recovery recommendations. The report
will include current fees and recovery levels as a percentage of full
costs, full costs, recommended fees, and remaining subsidy. DMG
will provide a fee adoption schedule and plan. We will assist the City
with an implementation strategy.
DETAILED WORK PLAN
Following is our detailed work plan, time estimate,
and cost breakdown. Please note, however, that the
estimates are for planning purposes only.
PHASE I: DET.Art-ED ANALYSIS
During Phase I, DMG will conduct the service cost
identification and cost analysis. The specific
tasks involved are described in the following
paragraphs.
TASK 1: PROJECT INITIATION
In our first task we will carry out those activities required to begin the
engagement in a manner that will ensure timely and successful
project completion. Included are the following:
Meet with the City Manager, Finance Director, and others as
appropriate to discuss the goals, objectives, and overall scope of
the engagement. Our designated Project Manager will
represent DMG in this initial meeting. It is important that the
City be represented by individuals who will be most directly
concerned with the ultimate engagement results.
Based upon this meeting, we will fmalize the scope of the
engagement. Any significant variations will be documented in
writing and provided to the City.
· Establish project liaison requirements
11
TASK/CONSULTANT
RATE HOURS COST
$ $
TASK 1
Pead 150 8 1,200
Payton 95 6 570
Wakefield 85 6 510
SUBTOTAL 20 2,280
TASK 2: ESTABLISH PROJECT LIAISONS
The revenue related services to be analyzed are carried out in various
departments and budget units. DMG methods focus of efforts at the
department level. We stress a full understanding of all requirements
for providing each of the City's specific services. It is important to
have a departmental liaison within each of the major departments to
work with us during the engagement. This ensures our
interpretations are correct and assists us in finding the appropriate
records to review or individuals to talk to.
TASK/CONSULTANT
RATE HOURS COST
$ $
TASK 2
Pearl 150 0 0
Payton 95 4 380
Wakefield 85 0 0
SUBTOTAL 4 380
TASK 3: DEVELOP COST ALLOCATION PLANS
DMG will prepare two cost allocation plans: a Full Cost central service
cost allocation plan for use in determining overhead charges to all
City programs for primary use in calculating full costs for the user fee
study, and an OMB A-87 plan for use in intergovernmental grants.
The DMG cost allocation plan methodology is the double step down,
cross allocation methodology, which is the most rigorous and
comprehensive of the distribution options contained in Federal
Circular OMB A-87 (the "bible" of cost allocation distribution
systems).
12
TASK/CONSULTANT
RATE HOURS COST
$ $
TASK 3
Pearl 150 0 0
Payton 95 40 3,800
Wakefield 85 60 5, 100
SU BTOTAL 100 8,900
TASK 4: DEVELOP SCHEDULE OF SERVICE AREAS TO BE
ANALYZED
In task 4 DMG will develop a schedule of the City's current user fees.
In addition, a listing of potential user fees will also be developed. Our
experience in working with California cities will aid in the
development of this list. DMG uses "check lists" of fees found in other
cities m assist in identifying potential fee areas.
TASK/CONSULTANT
RATE HOURS COST
$ $
TASK 4
Pearl 150 0 0
Payton 95 8 760
Wakefield 85 0 0
SUBTOTAL 8 760
TASK 5: DEVELOP DIRECT SERVICE COSTS
For each activity, where a revenue producing service is being
performed {or a non-revenue producing service for which a fee could
be imposed), DMG will develop the direct costs of providing the
service.
Direct costs generally include salaries and benefits of those
individuals actually performing the service and any services and
supplies that can be directly attributable to the service. To the extent
possible, it is our desire to identify as many costs as possible as direct
and treat the remaining costs where appropriate as indirect. Based
upon our extensive experience, we know that most supervisorial and
service and supply costs will be treated as indirect costs. In any
13
case, a hallmark of the DMG approach is a fully substantiated cost
analysis.
TASK/CONSULTANT
RATE HOURS COST
$ $
TASK 5
Pearl 150 8 1,200
Payton 95 110 10,450
Wakefield 85 8 680
SUBTOTAL 126 12,330
TASK 6: DISTRIBUTE DEPARTMENT/PROGRAM OVERHEAD
COSTS
In Task 6, indirect costs will be distributed to each service or activity.
In general, these costs reflect supervision occurring at the
department/division/program level and associated services and
supplies. DMG's approach to this distribution depends on the
complexity of the governmental unit being analyzed. The overall
distribution of costs is accomplished using DMG's FASTR System.
This system is the most comprehensive tool available to analyze
governmental service costs.
TASK/CONSULTANT
RATE HOURS COST
$ $
TASK 6
Pearl 150 0 0
Payton 95 5 475
Wakefield 85 5 425
SU BTOTAL 10 900
TASK 7: MATCH SERVICE REVENUE WITH SERVICE COSTS
In this task, the total cost of each service is matched with the total
revenue received from each service. In its basic form, the resulting
table illustrates the total tax subsidy associated with each senrice.
The table provides a departure point for use in fee discussions and
the development of consultant and staff recommendations.
14
TASK/CONSULTANT
RATE HOURS COST
$ $
TASK 7
Pearl 150 0 0
Payton 95 5 475
Wakefield 85 5 425
SUBTOTAL 10 900
TASK 8: REVIEW COST, REVENUE, AND SUBSIDIES WITH
DEPARTMENTS
The cost, revenue and subsidy analysis developed by DMG are based
upon information supplied by the City's departments. In Task 8, we
ereturn to each department to review the preliminary results. We
believe this to be an extremely important step as it is the departments
that must ultimately be comfortable with DMG's cost analysis and
methods.
Based upon the departmental reviews, changes will be made as
appropriate.
TASK/CONSULTANT RATE HOURS COST
$ $
Pearl 150 8 1,200
Payton 95 16 1,520
Wakefield 85 14 1,190
SUBTOTAL-TASK 8 38 3,910
TASK 9: REVIEW COST AND REVENUE RELATIONSHIP WITH
CITY MANAGEMENT
In a simplistic approach, the City could raise its user fees in order to
eliminate the subsidy depicted in the subsidy table. There are a
number of issues associated with doing this that must be taken into
consideration. Among others, there are the following:
, It may not be politically feasible to raise a particular fee.
, It may not be legal to raise a particular fee.
15
An undesirable social consequence may result from raising a
particular fee (i.e. a group _may be excluded from a desired
service).
An undesirable economic consequence my result (i.e. an
increase in fee may result in less revenue due to decreasing
demand).
In Task 9 the possible consequences of each potential action will be
discussed with the Project Advisory Group and other management
individuals. Based upon these discussions and DMG's experience,
recommendations will be formulated.
TASK/CONSULTANT RATE HOURS COST
$ $
Pearl 150 12 1,800
Payton 95 16 1.520
Wakefield 85 6 510
SUBTOTAL-TASK 9 34 3,830
e
PHASE II: IMPL~'-M~'-NTATION
In Phase II of the engagement, DMG will
work with the City in the development of an
implementation program. Tasks required to
implement this program and close out the
engagement are described below.
TASK 10: DEVELOP IMPLEMENTATION
_ STRATEOY
;L
A hallmark of the DMG approach to all of our engagements is to
facilitate change. In terms of a user fee analysis, this generally means
fee increases that result in additional general fund revenues.
Despite our extensive experience in similar efforts, we fmd that each
client desires to proceed somewhat differently when it comes to
implementation. In Task 10 we will work with top management to
develop an implementation strategy that will reflect the City of
Temecula's needs.
16
TASK/CONSULTANT RATE HOURS COST
$ $
Pead 150 6 900
Payton 95 16 1,520
Wakefield 85 0 0
SUBTOTAL-TASK 10 22 2,420
TASK 11: PREPARE AND PROVIDE DRAFT EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
Our standard procedure is to provide our project report to our clients
in draft form. This step offers an opportunity to discuss individual
recommendations in detail. Based upon these discussions, the draft
report will be modified as required and submitted in final form.
TASK/CONSULTANT RATE HOURS COST
$ $
Pearl 150 4 600
Payton 95 24 2,280
Wakefield 85 16 1,360
SUBTOTAL-TASK 11 44 4,240
TASK 12: PRESENT FINAL REPORT
The product from the proposed engagement is often controversial.
The subject of fees for service raises many important considerations
within the governmental bureaucracy, at the political level, and with
the public.
We believe it is extremely important that all parties fully understand
the basis for and rationale behind the project findings and
recommendations. To this end, DMG is committed to providing all
interested parties with an understanding of our approach and results.
This typically requires:
A presentation to management with less emphasis on detailed
methodology, but greater emphasis on the impact of
recommendations and implementation strategies.
Engagement presentation to the City Council to provide an overview
of the project and its findings. Any questions concerning the project
will be answered at this time. For costing purposes we have assumed
17
that two presentations will be required. Additional presentations will
be charged on a time-and-expense basis.
TASK/CONSULTANT RATE HOURS COST
$ $
Pearl 150 12 1,800
Payton 95 9 855
Wakefield 85 0 0
SUBTOTAL- TASK 12 21 2,655
TASK 13: PROJECT CLOSE OUT
In the final task we perform those activities necessary to ensure
successful project completion. Included are:
Remaining questions are answered.
· Update requirements and strategies are discussed.
A recommended adoption resolution (actual resolution or
ordinance to be drafted by the dty attorney.
· Implementation strategies
The above tasks summarize the activities necessary to accomplish the
work described. We emphasize that we remain flexible in all of our
engagements. Consequently, ff this work plan does not specifically
meet your needs, please advise us so that we may revise our
approach as required.
TASK/CONSULTANT RATE HOURS COST
$ $
Pearl 150 6 900
Payton 95 6 570
Wakefield 85 0 0
SUBTOTAL- TASK 13 12 1,470
18
e
MAJOR PROJECT MILESTONES & PROJECT REVIEW
MEETINGS
The principal milesWnes of the engagement are described below.
These milestones also represent potential project review meetings.
Draft User Fee Report - DMG reviews draft findings with the
departments on a department by department basis. When
these have been completed an overall draft report is provided.
Upon review the draft report is fmalized.
Presentation to the City Council - The final step in the process
is the presentation of results to the City Council.
DMG anticipates approximately three months to present its findings
to management. Presentation timing of the final document to the city
council is a client decision.
The total projected cost for the cost plan/user fee component is
shown below.
TASK/CONSULTANT
TOTAL
Pearl
Payton
Wakefield
GRAND TOTAL
RATE HOURS COST
150 64 9,600
95 265 25,200
85 120 10,200
449 45,000
Expenses will be billed at actual cost plus a 10% administrative charge.
Expenses will be limited to $5,000. We expect to come under the limit as
Erin Payton, the project manager for this engagement, will also be working
concurrently on the Riverside County Building and Safety fee analysis.
C. ADDITIONAL TASK
The City has requested that DMG analyze the operating and maintenance
costs associated with future expansions of the parks and streets systems.
DMG will accomplish this task and issue a separate report on this subject.
This task will be charged on a time and expense basis with a maximum fee
of $5,000.
19
D. UPDATE OPTIONS
Due to the DMG analytical method used to determine fee for service
activities (standard costs) it is not typically necessary to recalculate the fees
for several (4-5) years. This is because the work efforts do not change from
year to year. It is important, however, to adjust fees annually based on the
C.P.I.'
DMG does offer its computer programs under a perpetual lease
arrangement ($5,000 for each system). We urge all our clients to wait
several years before making any lease decision. DMG also provides
technical assistance in the fee determination {with client support) at a
reduction from the original fee - depending on the client's level of input.
E. DMG STAFF
The combined user fee/development impact fee study will be under the
overall direction of Mr. Richard L. Pearl, a vice president of the company and
responsible for the Western Region's cost and revenue enhancement
division. The cost plan/user fee component will be managed by Ms. Erin
Payton, a project manager with DMG and Ms. Candace Bonney and/or Mr.
Jeffery Wakefield as additional support.
2O
ITEM
17
APPROVAL R~
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFIC
CITY MANAGE
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Manager/City Council
Mary Jane McLarney, Assistant City Manager
February 28, 1995
Adhoc Committee for Community Services Funding
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council appoint two members of the Council to serve on an Adhoc Committee
to review Community Services Funding Applications.
BACKGROUND:
Subsequent to awarding the Community Services Funding Grant Applications on November
29, the City received two additional applications, Assistance League of Temecula Valley and
the Riverside County Child Care Consortium. If the City Council desires to consider these
applications, staff requests Council to appoint two members to review the applications. The
committee will meet only one time.
FISCAL IMPACT:
As of February 28, 1995, $22,500 is available in the FY 1995 Community Services Funding
budget.
R:\eyerek\edhoc.cef
ITEM
18
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Mary Jane McLarney, Assistant City Manager
February 28, 1995
Request for Funding for the Temecula Valley Film Council
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council consider a funding request for the Temecula Valley Film Council.
BACKGROUND:
The Film Council has requested a $24,000 operating grant for the Fiscal Year 1994-95. The
detail of the operating budget is included in the attached application. The application was
originally submitted under the Community Services Funding Program and was referred to the
Economic Development Program. As the Film Council has not identified any other funding
sources, staff would only recommend a matching grant not to exceed $10,000. This would
provide incentive to the Film Council to establish and prove their fund raising ability. A
$10,000 grant would, in staff's opinion, be appropriate for the return the City could expect
to receive from film crews visiting the City.
In addition, the Film Council also requested $15,000 in funding for a Film Festival in
September 1995. Upon review of both requests, staff initially recommended a matching grant
of $ 5,000 for each purpose. However, the Director of the Film Council has requested that the
entire sum be allocated to the Film Council operating budget.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Staff recommendation would provide up to $10,000 in matching funds to the Film Council for
operations as described in the attachment.
ATTACHMENT:
Temecula Valley Film Council
Community Services Funding Application
CITY OF TEMECULA
COMMUNITY SERVICE FUNDING PROGRAM
APPLICATION (Please Print or Type).
(1) $3,500 (2) $5,000
Amount Requested: $ m~l -nm~.n~- · ~94.
1) Location Scouting/Library
Project Name: 4) Print Media Advertisin~
Project Sta~ing Date: JUly, 1994
June, 1995
Project Ending Date:
(3) $10,000 (4)
2 ) FAM Tours 3 )
5 ) AFCI Membership
i_"' --
$5,000 (5') $500.00
Trade Shows
ORGANiZATION'S BACKGROUND:
Name of Organization:
Mailing address:
Telephone:
(909)
Number of paid staff -0-'
Geographic area(s) served
699-6267
Temecula Valley Film Council
43174 Business Park Drive. Temecula, CA
November 1992
Year Founded
Number of volumeera 100f
Temecula Valley
92590
is this organization incorporated in California as a non-profit organization?
Yes x No
If "yes":
Date of incorporation as a non-profit
Federal identification number
December 10,
33-0539648
·
If "no":
Name of sponsoring organization
Its federal identification number
Its state identification number
application has been authorized by the organization's:
X Board of Directors
Executive Committee -
1992
State identification number 17 16345
Inctude a copy of your statement of non-profit status from the State of California
Members-at-large
TEHECULA VALLEY FILN COUNCIL
Financial Report
July 31, 1994
Support & Revenue
Current
Month
Year to
Date
Motocross Beverage Sales
City of Temecula
T-shirt Sales
Disco Fundraiser
Total Support & Revenue
15.00
15.00
25.50
8000.00
10.00
13A.00
8169.50
Expenses
Motocross ABC Permit
Promotional
Insurance
Disco Fundraiser
Copies
Postage
Total Expenses
Income less expenses
Balance at beginning of year
Total Balance
14.00
169.82
106.57
290.39
(275.39)
15.00
2721.49
1518.37
508.67
57.25
7.25
4828.48
3341.02
1965.50
$ 5306.52
Reconciliation
July 31, 1994-
Balance at end of prior month
Income less expense (current month)
Balance July 31, 1994
5581.91
(275.39)
5306.52
/Bank of America..,
~Z--~EMECULA VALLEY FILM COUNCIL
O Daily Balance
Amount Dale
Date
06/20 $ 6,083.26 06/22
06/21 5,784.16 06/24
C;] Bank of America: In Balance
To assist you in reconciling your account, we have prepared
this personalized tool for you to use. Use it each month to
balance your statement with your checkbook register. We
have filled out'certain information to make it even more
convenient for you!
· Mark off each deposit, withdrawal, and check shown on this
statement in your checkbook register.
· Make sure that all transfers are written in your checkbook
register, including automatic deposits. automatic payments,
or transfers you made between accounts.
Statement Period: June 18 through July 18, 1994
Account Number. 07239-03546
Amount Date
5.617.61 07/07
5,581.91 07113
1 Your ending balance from
this statement
2 List deposits and credits that
do not appear on this statement
Oatt Amount Date Amount
Total from 2:
3 Subtotal by adding I and 2
4 List outstanding checks, withdrawals. and
debits that do not appear on this statement
CIt~CI~ ;~ Amount ChiCK ;~ Amount
5.490.34
5,320.52
5,320.52
Total from 4:
5 Subtract 4 from 3. This should match
the .balance in your checkbook register
· '//""
oote4u.0o~2, Page 2 of 2
Briefly describe the goals and objectives of your organization and the major
community services it provides. Include discussion regarding the specific ways your
organization meets the city*s criteria listed on page 2,
The mission ofthe Temec, dq Valley F'llm Council is to market Temecttla as a desirable,
cooperative, efficient and mutti-fnct, z~ location desfinMion for the film, television and
advertising industry by focusing on the unique and varied locations and services available.
The goal is to further the imerests of Teznecula economic development by attracting the
film industry' to our area, to act as a liaison between the film industry and the community,
to provide a focal point for all film related inquiries, to prepare and provide a location
library, production and service information to the industry, to educate local merchants to
the opportunities of servicing the film industry and to promote the relocation of film
companies to the area to generate new jobs.
Criteria
A. Does the organization provide community service excellence?
The Temecttht Valley Ftlm Council has only been in existence since November,
1992 and offi_c-ln!ly incorl~rated as a non-profit corporation last December 10, 1993.
1993 was quite a year of accomplishments for the ~im Council. Through a lot of
volunteer help and seed money from Eve Craig, Bob & Jeanne Burns, loSistics support
from the Chamber of Commerce, and valuable funding from the City Council we were
able to become a member of the Aasociation ofFHm Cotmnism'onen International, create a
4-color Locations postcard, create a TV/Film/Video Production Guide, produce 4 one-
hour episodes of the Community Variety Show showcasing area talents, area events, area
schools, area politics and area business. From the two marketing tools- locations postcard
and production 8uide, the Fthn Council was able to generate interest, attention and actual
production work in the area bene~tin$ not only the city and the business community but
some of its residents as well. Based on ~t'es ~iven to the Fdm Council by Creative
Alliance (Dunlop/Japans Golf Video), Vid-Co (Toyota, USA Car Commercial), Vamos
Photography (Honda Civic'94) and Shoemaker Productions (Motocross), an estimated
$96,000 was spent in our hotels, restaurants and support service-related businesses.
Shoemaker Productions is still in Teaneath and has actually leased an office in town, and
expanded not only to include Motocross racing but also Legends stock car racinF~
For 1994, with a grant from the city for $8,000, we were able to mail more production
guides and postcards to production companies and location scouts, and attend the
ShowBiz Expo at the Los Angeles Convention Center held last June 11-13, 1994. Below
are some of the of inquiry calls, location requests, location scouting and actual location
filming activities the film council has generated so far, for 1994:
1. Paramount Pictures location filming of *'Star Trek-The Next Generation" at
Callaway V'meyards. This one ( 1 ) day filming shoot was a concerted effort between the
localion scout, Callaway Vineyards, l~-mbossy Suites, Best Western and the Film Council.
Portions were also shot in Idyllwild. l~.stimnted spending forthis shoot was $15, 860.
11. Still photo shoot for the rock band, Lstter Rei~'s album cover. Thornton W'mery
and Howard Kauch's ~host town property on Pujol St. were used. Band members and
crew had breakfast at Desmy's, lunch at Kosa's Canfinn, bread & wine at Thornton W'me~
and dinner at Claim Jumper.
12. Video FootaSe request of the Temecula W'meries from the Director of Sales
Production Co. They are producinS a tourism protoo film for the California Division of
Tou~snL This film will be distributed to tour operators and travel agen~es wo~dwide.
The Film Council is aggressively working on convincin~ the production company to
include other Temecula assets like Old Town, golf courses, lakes, etc. in their project.
1 :}. Inquiry and request for our Production Guide from Robert Curran of MGM
Wo~dwide Television for future MGM film projects (see attached).
14. Photo Presen~tion request by Lynn Adelstein and F, mest Martin of Hollywood F~m
Production for vineyards with woodedrustic muctures. We sent them pictures of
Temecula Crest W'mery and Mount Palomar W'mery. This was a ShowBiz Expo lead.
B. What is the size and make-up of the community based organization:
The Temecula Valley Film Council consists of a Board of 11 Directors, and a
Liaison Board which is represented by almost every selFnet of the community. There are
no paid staff members.
C. What is the public and crific~ea~tion to the group: Very positive.
D. Does the organization have a high quality of fmcal management:
Jim Meyler is the Film Council accountant. He is the Manager of the CP A firm of
Donald McClean and Co., a regional accounting Fm Eve Craig, an active community
resident is the Film Council treasurer.
E. Will the organization have longevity in the City of Temecula:
h is our intent to be a permanent and effective entity in the City.
F. Is the CBO a non profit organization?
Yes.
G. Is there evidence of satisfactory service provided to city's citizen:
Please see Item A.
IL The CBO does not discriminate based on race, color, creed, nationality. sex,
marital sums, disability, religion or political affdiafion.
The Film Council does not discriminate.
, City of Temecula
Community Service Funding Program
Project(s) needing funding
How will your organization use any funding awarded? Give the project's objectives, number of persons
served, area where services are provided, and number of volunteers involved. Be specific. Note any
equipment or services that the award money would purchase and why it is needed. Please include a detailed
budget and a schedule of significant activities' related to this project. Please attach a maximum of one
double-spaced typewritten page of information if you need to expand your answer beyond this space.
Please see attached
Ci1T of Temecula "
- Community Service Funding Program
~ =cstion Page 5 · .
""' ~/e hereby certify the information contained in this application is true to the best of our knowledge and
belief.
(Sign both if same)
JO MOULTON, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
NAME AND TITLE (Please Print or Type)
(Signatur of ir~dividual preparing application form)
AND
JO MOULTON, EXECUTIVE DTRRCTOR
NAME AND TITLE (Please Print or Type)
and
(Sig zed Officer)
TEMECULA VAL-LEY FILM COUNCIL
(Organization Name)
43174 Business PArk Drive, Temecula, CA 92590
(Address of Organization)
(909) 699-6267 Aug, 20, 1994
(Telephone) (Date)
Return Completed Application to:
City of Temecula
Finance Department
Community Service Funding Program
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92590
(909) 694-6430
ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
OF
TEMECULA VALL~.Y FILM COUNCIL
FILt-'.D
DEC 8-19 2
N, ARCH FONG EU, Secre'~ry of
I
'The name of ~his corporation is Temecula Valler Film Council-
II.
· corporation is a nonprofit mutual benefit corporation
A. This under the Nonpru~it Mutual Benefit Corpora=ion Law. The
organized ,. ·
purpose of this corporation is to engage in any lawful act or
activity for which a corporation may be org&nized under such law.
B. The specific purpose of this corporation is to promote the
Temec~la Valley area of Riverside County to the entertainment and
advertising industries as a setting for shooting of films and
relaUed activities. '
III
The name and address in the State of California of this
corporation's initial agent for service oZ process is:
Christopher Willjams
CHRIS WILLIAMS & ASSOCIATES
41689 Enterprise Circle North, Suite 114
Temecula, CA. 92590
IV
Notwithstanding any of the above statements of purposes and
powers, this corpora=ion shall not, except to an insubstantial
degree, engage in any activities or exercise any powers that are
not in furtherance of the specific purposes oE this corporation-
1
E0 'a e8~s6=-686~ 01 . AMSS aMOD S,,al,8011U
'-
iif ";Ce,3L/t
V A L L E Y
TENECULA VALLEY FILM
FOR IMMEDIATE PBESS
CONTACT: lO MOULTON/MAGGI
(800) 814-4420 EXT. 8# / (909) 699-8681
COUNCIL
FILM COUNCIL ~ LOCATIONS FOR UNIVERSAL STUDIOS
MAJOR FEATURE FILM PROIECT
The Temecuh Valley F'!lm Council recently received a request to find very specific
location sites for a Universal Studios major feautre film project, scheduled to shoot for 31
days in November. Locations needed are:
1. A small town center (1-2 blocks long) in an agricultural area if possible (no desert).
The shopping center has to have the appearance and feel of a San Joaquin Valley
community. -
2. A lovely 2 story frame farm house with a porch built in the 1920's-1930's.
3. Eil~ht (8) houses in a neiBhborhood build in the 1940's with varying architectural styles.
4. A swimming pool built in the 1930's with a high dive ( if no diving board, the studio
will build one)
5. A quarry or swimming hole wiffi an overhand that a diver could dive from into the
water (mustbe a natural swimming hokeor quarry).
The film council has found 3 out of the 5 location r~luests but would not mind other
alternative sites. If you know of possible locations similar or close to the above, please
contact Jo Moulton or MaSSi Alien of the Film Council at (909) 699-6267 as soon as
possible.
Help us secure this film for our area....start: searching!
(909) 676-~O90 · Fax: (909) 694-O201 · After Hours: (909) 699-6267
Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce · 27450 Ynez Road, Suite 104 · Temecula, CA 92~91
V A L L E Y
TEM ECULA VALLEY FIL~
FOK IMMEDIATE PRESS I~LEASE:
T~necula Vall~ Film Council
Contact: Jo Moulton
(909) 699-6267
COUI'ICIL
HOLLYWOOD PRODUCTION COMPANY LOOKS FOR
BUILDINGS TO BLOW UP.w
THE T~"v~ECULA VALLEY FILM COUNCIL HAS Bison CONTACTED BY A LOS
ANG~T .F-S BASED PRODUCTION COMP~ TO ~-P SECURE LOCATIONS
FOR AN ACTION FILM.
SPECIFIC;J -~-Y, THE COMPANY IS SEAKCIiiNG FOR A "COMPOUND"
LOCATION COMPRISED OF AN ABANDONED GROUP OF STRUCTURES THAT
CAN BE BLOWN UP FOR TI-mm. CLIMACTIC SEQUENCE.
ANY PKOPEKTY OWNEl{ IN THE AREA WITH A DESIRE TO RID ITSELF OF
SOME UNWANTED BUILDINGS (I.E. FACTOKY, WAREHOUSES, GRAIN
ELEVATO~ lVIINING OPERATIONS, MANUFACTURING PLANT) ARE ASIcFD
TO CONTACT JO MOULTON OF TI-IE TEMECULA VAT J .F.y FILM COUNCIL AT
(909) 699-6267, IlVIMEDIATELY.
(909) 676-5090
TemecUi= valle.v Chamber
· Fax: (909)
Commerce
694-0201 * After liours: (909) 699-626T
· Z7450 Ynez Road. Suite 104 · Temeculs. CA
92591
:' m~ n.44, · · REQUEST
~ Fex; 73g-2122 · .
.,
C,~iif'orrj~ Tr.~ ~ Commerce AFr,.~
INSTRUCTIONS: Be ee epe{Ifle ae you =an wire the fieerlptl=~ of t~ 16;~lon er laeeuane you ere '-'
eeekffiS, At the end ~ eeah working day the CFC wiP fax yeue reduser ~ FU~ er=une ~e ltlle.
PieMe epec~ how you want ~!C$ to respoAd t~ your
~y ~m Yeur N~
· de~ Yew
-~~/~ ~ ~/~ /
CIrcle One':~ ~ Series) ~ M~ie) (Commer;i~) (M~ (Still) (PSA) Ot~er:
Urgen~ Fa~or, Circle One:
,.
....
To MeteR: (Le, New EngLand, Aeries.',: d,,vo~;,y,,v~' ,A,/Out~C a~t~ ~v~ ~vAv/*
Other Pans of the U.5. Being Scouted?: Y',-~'E' ,Vt~sre?,~,~:l/-:'.~,'f .~,~r",H,ir , .-../= J'
AcldZtlonel informalien Neecle~ .... Permits:_ Crew/Personnel:
I realize that you are very busy and ~his information is not
related to any specific project. However, we will be producing
several films in coming months and your ma=erial will help us to
determine which loca=ions are best suited for these projects.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contac% me at (310)
449-3769- Thank you for your assis=ance and I look forward to
hearing from you soon.
~t M. Curtc~n
Manager-Production
MGM Worldwide Television
R~C/vav
./'
ITEM 19
DEPARTMENTAL
REPORTS
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Council/City Manager
Anthony Bmo, Chief Building Official ~j
February 28, 1995
Building and Safety January 1995, Activity Report
RECOMMENDATION:
Receive and file.
DISCUSSION:
The following is a summary of activity for January 1995:
Building Permits Issued ............................................. 137
Building Valuation .......................................... 99,565,244
Revenue Collected ........................................... 9116,196.
Housing Starts .................................................... 51
Building Inspections ............................................. 1,477
Commercial Additions/Alterations ............................ 8 - 1,687 Sq. ft.
New Commercial Starts ................................. 3 - 173,827 Sq. ft.
V:%TONY%REPORTSUAN'gS.RPT 2/6/96 tde
APPROVAL
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning -~"'
February 28, 1995
Monthly Report
RECOMMENDATION:
Receive end File
Discussion:
The following is a summary of the Planning Department's
caseload and project activity for the month of January 1995:
Caseload Activity:
The Department received 4 applications for administrative cases and 2 applications for public
hearing cases for the month of January follows:
Specific Plan Land Use 1
Tentative Tract-Res Not R2/R4 I
Ongoing Projects:
Old Town Streetscaoe Improvement Project: The scope of the contract with EPT is
being finalized. Council approval is expected in March.
Old Town Redevelooment Project: Staff continues to meet with Zev Buffman and Gene
Hancock on project financing. The public comment period closed on January 27,
1995. Staff is currently working with the consultant to prepare the responses to
comments.
Development Code: The Advisory Committee has completed its review of the Draft
Code. A joint Planning Commission/City Council workshop to formally introduce a
public hearing draft of the development code is being scheduled. A draft zoning map
will also be presented at the workshop. The public hearing process before the Planning
Commission is scheduled to start on March 20, 1995. A public hearing Draft Code will
be available March 10, 1995.
French Valley Airoort: The Riverside County Aviation Commission met on January 18,
1995, and recommended approval to the County Board of Supervisors for the Final
Environmental Impact Report, Facility Master Plan for the French Valley Airport. The
Airport Land Use Commission ha postponed consideration of the Comprehensive Land
Use Plan until May 1995.
It:~ONTI. ILy.RYf~I994AIAN 2/22/95 vlw 1
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
REVENUE STATUS REPORT
001
161
ACCOUNT #
4147
4148
4149
4150
4151
4152
4153
4154
4155
4156
4157
4169
4170
4180
4200
4206
4226
4260
4261
~L
15:50:26
GENERAL FUND
PLANNING
DESCR]PT]ON
VACATIONS PLAN CK
DOCUMENT PROCESSING
CONDEMNATION PLAN CHECK
REVERSION TO ACRE. PLAN CHECK
PARCEL NAP PLAN CHECK
TRACT NAP PLAN CHECK
ANENDED NAP PLAN CHECK
4TH & SUBS. SUBMITTALS
FENA STUDY REVIEW
LOIA REVIEW
DRAINAGE STUDY REVIEW
IMPROVE INSPECTION ON-SITE
K-RAT STUDY FEES
FAST TRACK PLANNING
FORHA FAST TRACK
IN HOUSE PLAN CHECKS
ANNEXATION FEES
TEMPORARY USE PERMIT
ACCESSORY WIND ENERGY
LARGE FANILY DAY CANE
HAZARDOUS WASTE FACILITY
LAND DIV UNIT NAP
LANDSCAPE PLAN CHECK
PLANNZNG
CITY OF TEMECULA
REVENUE STATUS REPORT
JANUARY 1995
ADJUSTED
ESTINATE
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
o00
.00
.00
170,000.00
JANUARY
REVENUE
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
840°00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
7,985.00
28,266.19
1~4'~5
REVENUE
.00
,00
.00
.00
,00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
,00
.00
.00
.00
.00
5,870.00
710.00
.00
.00
.00
,00
187.00
29,425.00
147,056.09
PAGE
BALANCE
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
5.870.00-
710.00-
.00
~ o00
.00
.00
187.00-
29,425.00-
22,943.91
COL
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
/J~Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
February 28, 1995
Public Works Monthly Activity Report
RECOMMENDATION:
Attached for City Council's review and filing is the Department of Public Works' Monthly
Activity Reports for January, 1995.
r:~agthpt~a~gupUajp
Monthly Activity Report
February 16, 1995
Page 2
6. Kent Hinterqardt Memorial Park:
The contractor is addressing the final punch list items generated during the final walk
through and the project is expected to be completed by the end of February, 1995.
The project consists of the construction of a 950 square foot concession stand and
rest room facility with a 225 square foot porch.
7. Traffic Signal & Vehicle Pre-Emotion Installation:
The contractor will start work by February 21, 1995 and the pre-emption installation
should be completed within two weeks. The project includes the installation of Traffic
Signal Emergency Pre-Emption equipment at four (4) signalized intersections and
Vehicle Emergency Pre-Emption equipment on nine (9) Fire Department vehicles.
8. Pala Road/Route 79S .Interim Imi~rovements:
The contractor expects to start work on February 21, 1995 and complete the work
within 3 weeks. The work to be performed includes, construction of asphalt
pavement, traffic striping and signing, embankment construction, and traffic control
to construct a right turn lane for traffic proceeding east on Route 79S to south on Pala
Road.
9. Winchester Road Interim Ramp Improvements:
The contractor has delivered the second "Construction Update" notice and is starting
work on February 21, 1995. All lane closures will be at night-time hours so that
traffic will be allowed through the site at all day time hours. The project will be
completed within 3 months. The project will consist of widening both the south and
north sides of Winchester Road between Jefferson Avenue and the I-15 south bound
ramps. The existing traffic signals at Jefferson Avenue and the south bound ramps
will be modified along with the landscaping and irrigation.
10. Traffic Signal at Margarita Rd. & Avenida Barca:
The contractor will start work during the week of February 27, 1995 and expects to
be completed by early April. This project is Federally funded and consists of the
installation of a fully actuated traffic signal, signing and striping at the intersection of
Margarita Rd. and Avenida Barca.
r:~noectrpt%cip%gS~jen.95/ejp
Month/y Activity Report
February 16, 1995
Page 4
4. Sam Hicks Monument Park Imorovement PrQject:
The final plan check comments have been returned to the architect and the plans and
specifications are expected to be ready for the solicitation of bids by the middle of
March, 1995. The improvements include the construction of a 950 square foot
concession stand and rest room facility, an asphalt parking lot, landscaping and
irrigation improvements, and assorted park site amenities. The construction activities
are to be coordinated with the construction of the museum and church renovation
projects.
5. Rencho Vista Road and Mira Loma Drive Sidewalk Imorovements:
This project is funded from Senate Bill 821 funds for Fiscal Year 1994-95. The project
consists of the installation of approximately 14,600 square feet of sidewalk on the
northerly side of Rancho Vista Rd. between Mira Loma Dr. and Santa Suzanne Dr., the
easterly side of Mira Loma Drive between Rancho Vista Rd. and Santa Cecilia Dr., and
the southerly side of Rancho Vista Rd. east of Avenida de la Reina. This project is in
the early stages of design and is expected to be out to bid by May, 1995.
6. Solana Way Storm Drain Imorovements:
The City received seven RFP's on November 28, 1994 from local engineering firms
for the construction of the Solana Way storm drain improvements (Ynez Road to
Acacia Park Resort Apartments). The improvements to be constructed include, but
not limited to grading, main line storm drain, utility relocations, misc. structures,
erosion control, and traffic control. A meeting has been scheduled for Thursday,
February 14, 1995 with the highest ranked firm to discuss the scope of work and
negotiate the terms of a professional services contract.
7.1-151Rancho California Road Interchange Modifications:
The project plans and specifications are approximately 95% complete and will be
resubmitted to Caltrans after the consultant completes the plans for the northbound
off-ramp using the option which includes a 2:1 slope design and the purchase of
additional right-of-way.
8. I-1 51Overland Drive Overcrossing Improvements:
The Project Report and Project Study Report have been reviewed and approved by
Caltrans. The plans and specifications have been submitted to Caltrans for final
review on Friday, January 13, 1995. The structural plans have been submitted to
Caltrans (Division of Structures) on Friday, January 6, 1995 for review. The
consultant is preparing the legal plats and descriptions of the properties that need to
be acquired.
r:~noactrpt%cip~95~an.gSi~p
LAND DEVELOPMENT
Monthly Activity Report
Special Projects
January, 1995
Cf..~c- Submitted by: Joseph Kicak
Prepared by: Raymond A. Casey
Date: February 10, 19.95
FFMAIOFS RFIMRURRFMFNT:
Staff is continuing to coordinate with the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the
State Office of Emergency Services (OES) representatives in seeking reimbursement for costs
incurred by the City due to the January 1993 floods and ensuing disaster declaration. OES has
reimbursed the City a total of ~952,832 to date. The Murrieta Creek Damage Survey Report was
determined to be a valid claim bringing the total cumulative reimbursable amount to $1,080,996.
Staff has also been coordinating with FEMA and OES in seeking reimbursement for costs incurred
by the City due to the recent floods of January/February 1995.
PARKVIFW SITF (PROJFCT NO. PW93-09):
The Final Rough Grading Plan is being reviewed by City Staff along with the Pauba Road
/' 'provement Plans and the Construction Specifications. Rough Grading construction is anticipated'
begin in April 1995 and be completed in May 1995.
ASSFSSMFNT nlSTRICT 159 (AD 159):
The AD 159 improvements, as listed, are at the following stages of construction:
Temecula Creek is approximately 95% complete.
The Butterfield Stage Road, and DePortola Road improvements are complete and the roads
are nearly ready for City acceptance.
Highway 79 South plans will be submitted to Caltrans (third plan check) and RCFCD (second
plan check) in February.
Pala Road's Request For Proposal for environmental consulting has been approved by
Caltrans. Phase I construction (from Butterfield Stage Road to Avenida de Missions) is
scheduled to begin this summer.
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 161 (AD 1 61 ):
Winchester Road (Area II) - estimated completion date is January 1996
The Notice to Proceed was issued for Murrieta Hot Springs Road (West) and the estimated
completion date is mid June 1995.
To date, we have met with Rancho California Water District and Eastern Municipal Water District
and all draft, conceptual, and tentative development plans and information were forwarded. We
~'~ re also met with Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District's Planning
dision and have determined the criteria regarding Murrieta Creek's improvements in order to
proceed with the designs of the proposed First Street and Western Bypass Corridor Bridge
Crossings.
The 45 day review period of the Draft Environmental Impact Report ended on January 23, 1995
and we are awaiting comments from the State Clearing House
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Joseph Kicak, Interim Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Brad Buron, Maintenance Superintendent
February 1, 1995
Monthly Activity Report - January 1995
The following activities were performed by Public Works Department, Street Maintenance Division
in-house personnel for the month of January 1995:
II.
III.
IV.
VI.
SIGNS
A. Total signs replaced
B. Total signs installed
C. Total signs repaired
TREES
A. Total trees trimmed for sight distance and street
sweeping concerns
POTHOLES
A. Total square feet of potholes repaired
CATCH BASINS
A. Total catch basins cleaned
RIGHT-OF-WAY WEED ABATEMENT
A. Total square footage for right-of-way abatement
GRAFFITI REMOVAL
A. Total locations
B. Total S.F.
STENCILING
A. 16 new and repainted legends
B. 0 L.F. of red curb new and repainted
C. 0 S.F. of sandblasting/grinding
VII.
14
633
211
0
13
1,933
r:%roads~e~t~pt~gS%01 ekg
MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT - January 1995
Page No. 3
STREET MAINTENANCE CONTRACTORS
The following contractors have performed the following projects for the month of December.
MONTELEONE EXCAVATING
Account No. 5409
Date: January 11, 1995
Citywide Debris
Miscellaneous Clean-Up
Total Cost: $1,481.00
Account No. 5402
Date: January 10, 1995
Cabrilio/John Warner Street Clean-Up
Total Cost: $402.00
Account No. 5402
Date: January 10, 1995
Emergency Work Street Clean-Up
Miscellaneous Jobs
Total Cost: $580.00
Account No. 5402
Date: January 18, 1995
Citywide Street Culvert Clean-up
Total Cost: $1,092.00
r:%roads%a~trpt~g5~)1 ekg
MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT - January 1995
Page No. 5
Account No. 5402
Date: January 5, 1995
Citywide Miscellaneous Street Debris Clean-Up
Total Cost: ;4,958.50
Account No. 540~
Date: January 14, 1995
Utah Pacific moves for equipment to Via Lobo Channel Clean-Out
Total: ;540.00
Account No. 5402
Santiago Road
Removal of Silt from Desilting Ponds
Total: ;496.00
Account No. 5402
Date: January 13, 1995
Sports Park
Quantity (22.31) 1/4 Ton Rip-Rap Rock for Erosion Control
Total: ;320.72
Account No. 540~
Date: January 11, 1995
Misc. Clean-Up
(5) Motor Grader
(5) Motor Grader
for John Warner Road/Liefer Road/Walcott Lane
Total: ;960.00
r:%roeds%actrpt%g5%01 ekg
MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT - January 1995
Page No. 7
Account No. 5401
Date: January 10, 1995
Via Lobo Channel Clean-Out
Total: $6,874.10
Account No. 5401
Date: January 10, 1995
Santiago Road Channel Clean-Out
Total: $4,523.00
Account No. 5401
Date: January 10, 1995
Pala Road Channel Rip-Rap
Total: $2,754.00
Account No. 5401
Date: January 10, 1995
Santiago Road Desilting Ponds
Lay Plastic/Sandbags
Total: $286.00
Account No. 5401
Date: January 9, 1995
Liefer Road
Rip-Rap Placement for Erosion Control
Total: $2,922.00
r:%roade%actrpt%gb'~01 ekg
MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT- January 1995
Page No. 9
Account No. 5401
Date: January 10, 1995
Pala Road Channel Cleaning Tickets Missed on first billing
Total: $1,838.50
Account No. 5401
Date: January 19, 1995
Via Lobo Channel Cleaning
Total: $5,442.70
Account No 5401
Date: January 13, 1995
Santiago Road Channel Cleaning
Total: $7,748.20
Account No. 5401
Date: January 13, 1995
Liefar Road
Rip-Rap Concrete for Erosion Control
Total: $1,731.53
Account No. 5401
Date: January 14, 1995
Pala Road Channel
Rip-Rap and Concrete for Erosion Control
Total: $5,580.64
r:~oads~fl~gb'~01 ekO
MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT - January 1995
Page No. 11
Account No. 5401
Date: January 19, 1995
Vallejo between Santiago and Ynez
Channel Repairs/Rip-Rap and Concrete
Total: $3,210.00
Account No. 5401
Date: January 11, 1995
Moraga Road/Margarita Road Channel Restoration
Rip-Rap
Total: $6,530.50
Account No. 5401
Date: January 14, 1995
Moraga/Margarita Channel Restoration
Total: $753.00
Account No. 5401
Date: January 12, 1995
Temecula Elementary
MoragalMargarita Channel Restoration
Total: $2,390.00
Account No. 5401
Date: January 19, 1995
Moraga Road Channel Restoration
Total: $4,181.00
r:~,roKll~mQtrpt~S~t~)l
MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT- January 1995
Page No. 13
ARBOR-PRO TRI:;
Date: January 7, 1995
Emergency Tree Removal end Trimming due to wind and rain
Total trees 12
Total Cost: ~900.00
r:~roede~aotrpt~gb'M)l ekg
TRAFFIC DIVISION
Monthly Activity Report
For January, 1995
Submitted by: Joseph Kicak
Prepared by: Marty Lauber
Date: February 15, 1995
I. TRAFFIC REnUFSTS
TRAFFIC REQUESTS: Nov. Dec. Jan.
Received 3 6 4.
Completed 6 6 ' 3
Under Investigation 6 5 9'
Scheduled for Traffic Commission 0 3 2
II.
DIVISION PROJECTS:
A. The Safe Route to School Committee has begun their review of traffic
operations at Rancho Elementary School. The first step in our process involves
working with the school district to establish a suggested route to school exhibit
to be distributed to all students.
Sent Requests for Proposals (RFP) to Traffic Engineering Firms for the deign
for traffic signal on State Route 79 (S) at Margarita Road/Redhawk Parkway.
The proposals were submitted January 3, 1995, for Staff review and consultant
selection. The recommendations should be presented to City Council at the
February 14, 1995 City Council meeting.
Ce
The Public/Traffic Safety Commission has approved two prototype designs for
possible Special street name signs. Staff's intention was to establish an
alternate street name sign that would replace damaged wooden street name
signs. The Commission recommended that the proposed signs become a
Citywide standard, implemented through attrition. The Meadowview
Community might maintain and operate street signs in their neighborhood upon
approval by the City Council and execution of an appropriate agreement.
De
Requested two fiscal impact estimates for the naming of State Route 79
(South), from the California Department of Transportation. Naming SR 79(S)
would involve modifying or replacing the large guild signs on Interstate 15 and
all local street name signs.
Issued a work order to re-stripe the intersection of Diaz Road and Winchester
Road to provide for dual turns. Westbound left turns and Northbound right
turns will be expanded to handle the high turn demand. This will be
accomplished by converting two exclusive through lanes to dual purposed lanes
for through and turn movements.
TEMECULA COMMUNITY
SERVICES DISTRICT
ITEM
1
APPROVA
CITY ATTORNE~
FINANCE OFFIC
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
Board of Directors
FROM:
Ronald E. Bradley, General Manager
DATE:
February 28, 1995
SUBJECT:
Swim Team Agreement
PREPARED BY: ~
RECOMMENDATION:
Herman D. Parker, Recreation Superintendent
That the Board of Directors:
Approve the Agreement between the City of Temecula Community Services Department and
the Temecula Tritons Swim Team, for use of the Community Recreation Center Swimming
Pool.
DISCUSSION: The Temecula Tritons Swim Team has requested continued use
of the Temecula Community Recreation Center Swimming Pool for youth competitive swim
programs and activities. The Tritons are a local non-profit organization, (swim team)
committed to promoting aquatic activities and competitive swim programs for youth. The
Tritons organized and coordinated an extremely successful youth swim team during the
Summer and Fall of 1994, participating in seven (7) swim meets and registering over forty-six
(46) team members.
In an effort to support the Temecula Triton Swim Team and their programs continued success
and growth, staff has prepared the attached Agreement, "Between the City of Temecula
Community Services Department and the Temecula Tritons Swim Team". The proposed
Agreement provides the Tritons use of the Temecula Community Recreation Center Swimming
Pool from March I st through November 20th of each year. The proposed Agreement would
become effective March 1, 1995 and terminate November 20, 1997, with a two (2) year
renewal option. A minimal fee of ~10.00 for each hour of use by the Tritons would be
assessed to help defray costs associated with the pools maintenance and operations.
The proposed Agreement has been reviewed and approved by the Community Services
Commission and our City Attorney.
FISCAL IMPACT: The ~10.00 fee for each hour of pool use by the Tritons will help
off-set pool operation and maintenance costs.
The Tritons, at its own cost and with prior written appwval of the Direcwr of
Community Services, may install, erect or place limited or minor improvements in
the Swimming Pool area, including scoreboards or announcement boards. Such
impwvements shall not be installed without prior written consent of the Director of
Community Services. All such improvements which are attached w the building or
deck shall become the property of the City upon termination of this Agreement.
The Tritons shall be solely responsible for all purchases rehtive to its activities, and
shall hold and save the City harmless therefrom.
10.
The Tritons shall be solely responsible for pwviding security for the Swimming Pool
area; which security shall include locking of the security gates at said pool when
occupied by Triton Swim Team.
The Triwns shall be responsible for moving the pool cover as necessary for usage,'
and rephcing said cover upon the completion of said usage.
11.
The City shall provide normal maintenance to the Swimming Pool, deck, locker
rooms, adjacent axeas and water treatment.
12.
13.
The City shall provide at its sole cost the necessary utilities for heating, operation
and use of the Swimming Pool and adjacent areas.
The Tritons hereby agrees to defend, indemnify, protect and hold the City, its
officers and employees harmless from and against all claims, damage, loss, cost or
expense, including reasonable atWrney's fees, arising out of or in any way resulting
from the use and operation of the Swimming Pool during March 1st through
November 20th by Tritons, excepting therefrom such times as the pool may be used
by City for its programs and for the cost of any impwvements Tritons may make to
the Swimming Pool pursuant to paragraph 7.
14.
The Tritons shall secure and maintain during the term of this Agreement, public
liability and property damage insurance as shall protect it from claims for damages
for personal injury, including death, as well as for claims for property damage which
may arise pursuant W operations under this Agreement. Such insurance shall include
public liability insurance in mount not less than $1 million for injuries, including
death, to any one person, and $2,000,000 on account of any one occun'ence, and
property damage insurance in an mount not less than $500,000.
Policies or certificates evidencing the above requLred coverage shall be filed with the
City and shall include the City, its elected officials, officers, employees and agents
as an additional insured. The policies shall not be cancelled or materially changed
without thkrty (30) days prior written notice to the City.
BE'rW~:~:N ~ C1TY OF ~ COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
AND ~ Tl~MECULA TRITONS SWIM TEAM
This Agreement entered into on this day of , , by and between
the Community Services Department of the City of Temecula, hereinafter referred to as "City" and
the Temecula Triton Swim Team, hereinafter referred to as 'Tritons", muV~lly agree as follows:
The City hereby grants permission to Tritons to use the Temecula Community
Recreation Center Swimming Pool, hereinafter referred to as "Swimming Pool",
located at 30875. Rancho Vista Road, Temecula,. California. The Tritons may use
the Swimming Pool from March 1st through November 20 of each year, at the times.
and under the terms hereinafter set forth.
The term of this Agreement shall commence on March 1, 1995, and shall end on
November 20, 1997, with a two (2) year renewal option, unless terminated sooner,
for any reason, by either party upon thirty (30) days prior written notice to the
other.
The City shall at nil times have first priority for the use of the Swimming Pool for
City sponsored programs, activities and services. The Tritons shall schedule their
dates and hours for using the Swimming Pool with the City on a seasonal basis. All
Triton events and activities at the pool must be approved by the City.
The Tritons shall pay to the City monthly rent, in the 3mount of $10.00 for each
hour of use. Rent shall be due and paid to the City on the last day of each month
the Tritons use the Swimming Pool. The payment of rent shall be accompanied by
a detailed listing of each date and hour of use by the Tritons, for each month.
During said dates of March 1st through November 20 of each year, Tritons shall
provide at its sole cost such personnel as may be necessary to maintain adequate
supervision and ensure safety at the Swimming Pool, locker rooms and adjacent
areas for all Triton events and activities. In addition, Tritons sh~ll provide the
necessary lifeguards as required by state hw or local ordinance. Said personnel
sb~ll be and are employees of Tritons and not the City.
The Tritons shall be responsible for ensuring that the Swimming Pool, locker rooms
and adjacent areas are clean, neat in appearance and free of litter or debris after their
use on a daily basis.
15.
The City reserves the right to increase the amounts of insurance coverage described
hereinabove, and tO require additional riders or provisions in said policies or
certificates as may be deemed necessary, consistent with the purposes of this
Agreement.
The Tritons shall be responsible for any damage or destruction to the subject
premises resulting from Tritons use thereof or failure to properly maintain security
and shall return the subject premises to City, upon termination of this Agreement,
in a clean and safe condition.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day
and year first above written.
CITY OF TEMECULA
Jeffcry E. Stone Date
Mayor
TEMECULA TRITON SWIM TEAM
President Date
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney Date
June S. Greek Date
City Clerk '
ITEM 2
APPROVAT~
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFI
CITY MANAGER
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
General Manager/Board of Directors
FROM:
Genie Roberrs, Finance Officer
DATE:
February 28, 1995
SUBJECT:
Review and Approval of the 1994-95 Mid-Year Budget
PREPARED BY: Tim McDermott, Chief Accountant
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO 95-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AMENDING THE
FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGETS
DISCUSSION: Each year a mid-year review is conducted of the Temecula Community
Services District (TCSD) operating budgets. The purpose of this review is to conduct an
analysis of revenues and expenditures to ensure that the TCSD maintains a prudent and
healthy fiscal position. The Finance Department staff has performed an analysis of revenues.
Additionally, TCSD staff has reviewed the operating budgets and has submitted year-end
expenditure projections.
Activity in each of the funds is presented in accordance with the following schedules:
Schedule A - Fund Summary: Illustrates activity in terms of the current budget, year-
to-date activity as of December 31, 1994, and the recommended mid-year amended
budget. Schedule A presents the beginning fund balance, revenues, expenditures and
operating transfers, and the projected ending fund balance based upon this activity.
Schedule B - Revenue Detail: Illustrates revenue detail by fund source in terms of the
current projections, year-to-date activity as of December 31, 1994, and the mid-year
revised projections,
Schedule C - Expenditure Summary: Illustrates summaries of expenditures by each
department within the fund in terms of the current budget, year-to-date activity as of
December 31, 1994, and the mid-year revised projections.
FISCAL IMPACT: The mid-year adjusted budget projections result in either minor increases
or no change in the projected fund balances at June 30, 1995. There is no impact on current
assessment rates.
Attachments: Resolution
Schedules A through C:
- TCSD
- Service Levels A through D
- Debt Service Fund
Exhibit I - Personnel Allocation By Department
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Board of
Directors of the Temecula Community Services District at a regular meeting thereof, held on
the 28th day of February, 1995, by the following vote of the Board of Directors:
BOARDMEMBERS:
NOES:
BOARDMEMBERS:
ABSENT: BOARDMEMBERS:
June S. Greek, Board Secretary
SCHEDULE A
Revenue
Expenditures
Excess of Revenues Over Expenditures
Transfers from (to) Other Funds
Increase (decrease) in Fund Balance
Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 1994
Est. Fund Balance, June 30, 1995
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
SERVICE LEVEL A
191 FUND SUMMARY
FY 94-95 FY 94-95 FY 94-95
AMENDED YTD @ YEAR-END
BUDGET 12/31/94 PROJECTION
157,158 $ 1,383 $ 157,162
182,808 81,171 182,808
(25,650) (79.788) (25,646)
0 0 0
(25,650) $ (Ts,7ee) (25,646)
83,448 83,448
57,798 $ 57,802
21 -Feb-95
SCHEDULE A
Revenue
Expenditures
Excess of Revenues Over Expenditures
Transfers from (to) Other Funds
Increase (decreeso) in Fund Balance
Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 1994
Est. Fund Balance, June 30, 1995
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
SERVICE LEVEL C
193 FUND SUMMARY
FY 94-95
AMENDED
BUDGET
476,214 $
571,21 5
(95,001)
(15,397)
(110,398) $
335,535
225,137
FY 94-95
YTD@
12/31/94
12,292
314,493
(302,201)
(15,397)
(317,598)
FY 94-95
YEAR-END
PROJECTION
476,214
571,215
(95,001)
(15,397)
(1'10,398)
335,535
225,137
21 -Feb-95
SCHEDULE A
/~-
Revenue
Expenditures
Excess of Revenues Over Expenditures
Operating Transfers In
Increase (decrease) in Fund Balance
Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 1994
Est. Fund Balance, June 30, 1995
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
DEBT SERVICE FUND
390 FUND SUMMARY
FY 94-95
AMENDED
BUDGET
0 $
499,600
(4 gg, GO0)
4gg,GO0
0 $
510,4~0
510,430
FY 94-95
YTD{~
12/31/94
7,699
330,596
C322,eg7)
318,863
(4,034)
$
$
FY 94-95
YEAR-END
PROJECTION
10,000
502,984
(492,984)
: 11,446
510,430
521,876
21 -Feb-95
SCHEDULE B
k
NO TSCD
FUND 191 SERVICE' LEVEL A
I DEPT 180 NON-DEPARTMENTAL
4005 -Assessments
4006 4.ien Ratease
4065 4rivetmerit Inter~t
4390 -Sb'eet Lighting Fees
FUND 192 SERVICE LEVEL B
DEPT 180 NON-DEPARTMENTAL
4005 -Alle~mertts
4065 4nvestmertt Interet
4300 -Steer Lighting Fee
ITOTAL FUND 192
FUND 198 SERVICE LEVEL C
DEFT 180 NON-DEPARTMENTAL
4005 -Assessments
4064 -Recovery of Assessmere
4065 -Investment Interest
4120 -Public Use Permit
,,J423 -Specific Plan
/ g -Dedication Fees
0 -LlJldsMpe Plan Check
4371 -Landscape Inspection
ITOTAL FUND 1'~
FUND 194 SERVICE LEVEL D
DEFT 180 NON-DEPARTMENTAL
4005 -Assessments
4006 -Lien Release
4065 -Investment Interest
TOTAL FUND 194
TOTAL ALL TCSD FUNDS
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
REVENUE DETAIL
BY FUND SOURCE
FY 94-85
BUDGET
PROJECTION
~'J..~,jJv
0
1,800
0
FY 94-95
0
4
1,37~
0
216,186
3,000
0
219,186 I
3
2,834
7,639
10,476 I
428.214
0
8,000
0
0
0
20.000
20,000
476,214
0
0
8,667
0
0
0
0
5,625
12,292
1,474,787
0
2,500
1,477,287
5,129,618
0
165
3,576
3,741
165,228
FY 94-65
PROJECTION
155~58
4
1,800
0
216,186
3,000
7,63~
228,825
428,214
0
8,000
0
0
0
20,000
20,000
476,214 I
1,474,787
163
2,500
1,477,452
5,182,078
VARIANCE
4
0
0
" 7,638
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
;0
0'
0
163
0
163
52,460
21 -Feb.65
SCHEDULE C
r,---1
190 TCSD CITY-WIDE FUND
TCSD NON-DEPT.-DEPT 180
-Personnel Services
-Operating Expenditures
-Operating Expenditures
-Capital Expenditures
'Subtotal
OPERATING TRANSFER OUT
Total Department
SENIORS-DEPT 1 81
-Personnel Services
-Operating Expenditures
-Operating Expenditures
-Capital Expenditures
. Department
CRC-DEPT 182
-Personnel Sen/ices
-Operating Expenditures
-Operating Expenditures
-Capital Expenditures
Total Department
RECREATION-DEPT 183
-Personnel Services
-Operating Expenditures
-Operating Expenditures
-Capital Expenditures
Total Department
TOTAL TCSD FUND 190
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
EXPENDITURE BUMMARY
BY DEPARTMENT
FY 94-95 FY 94-95 FY 94-95
ADJUSTED YTD @ MID-YEAR
APPROPRIATION 12/31/94 AMENDED BUDGET
669,838
445,801
632,448
12,847
2,265,364
305,546
204,957
359,587
6,900
876,990
320,777
1,197,767
667,573
445,801
634,713
12,847
2,265,364
55,765
44,400
0
10,000
110,165
23,632
14,426
0
9,007
47,065
43,509
0
10,000
110,165
78,591
164,300
0
0
242,891
34,328
90,953
0
0
125,281
80,567
162,324
0
0
242,891
128,400
134,519
0
0
262,91 9
2,881,339
67,793
80,130
0
0
147,923
1,51 8,036
135,726
163,51 9
0
0
2,917,665
VARIANCE
INCREASE
(DECREASE)
(2,265)
0
2,265
0
891
(891)
0
0
0
(1,976)
0
0
7,326
26,000
0
0
36,326
36,326
-0.3%
0.0%
0.4%
0.0%
1.6%
-2.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.5%
-1.2%
0.0%
0.0%
5.7%
21
0.0%
0.0%
1.3%
21 -Feb-95
SCHEDULE C
~3
390 TCSD DEBT SERVICE
NON DEPT-DEPT 199
-Personnel Services
-Operating Expenditures
-Operating Expenditures
-CRpit~l Expenditures
TOTAL DEBT SERVICE FUND
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
DEBT SERVICE
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY
FY 84-95 FY 94-95
ADJUSTED YTD @
APPROPRIATION 12/31/94
FY 84-95
MID-YEAR
AMENDED BUDGET
0
499,600
0
0
499,600
0
330,595
0
0
0
502,984
0
0
VARIANCE
INCREASE
(DECREASE)
0
3,384
0
0
3,384
0.0%
0.7~..
0.0%
0.0%
21 -Feb-95
ITEM 3
APPROV
CITY A'I'rORNEY~V~~
FINANCE OFFICE
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
Board of Directors
FROM:
Ronald E. Bradley, General Manager
DATE:
February 28, 1995
SUBJECT: Parkview Site Project - Phase II
PREPARED BY'-~/ Phyllis L. Ruse, Senior Management Analyst
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors approve Amendment No. I of
$66,300 to the design contract with RJM Design Group, Inc. to include the design,
construction documents, and construction administration for Phase II of the Parkview Site
Project, described as the upper pond and channel improvements adjacent to the Sports Park
Desiltstion Lake.
BACKGROUND: On January 24° 1995, the Board of Directors approved the Master Ran for
the Parkview Site and Phase I of litis project, which will include a new fire station and off-site
street improvements to Paube Road. In this Master Plan, RJM Design Group, Inc. included
improvements to the Rancho California Sports Park Desiltation Lake and the upstream channel
bed in the overall design for the Parkview Site.
The City has received studies and reports regarding the Rancho California Sports Park
Desiltation Lake, which will .be beneficial in the design of improvements and future
maintenance of the channel and ~)dm. The improvements to the Desiltation Lake are supported
by the Union for a River Greenbelt Environment (URGE). URGE is the recipient of two grants
from the Califomia Water Resources Department, each in the amount of $50,000 for the lake
project. The City must, however, begin construction on the improvements by June 30, 1995
or the funds will be in jeopardy of being withdrawn.
There is sufficient time to prepare construction drawings, obtain necessary permits, bid and
award this project before the Juee 30 deadline. The upstream improvements would be the
first component of the overall lake improvements and Phase II of the Parkview Site Project.
The shallow pond will help remo~ae sediment from the water before it reaches the lake, will be
easier and less costly to clean, aed by the water's constant movement, will help improve its
quality. Improvements to the dtannel bed itself will also aid in silt removal from final
disposition in the lake. A pump vii circulate water from the larger detention basin to the pond
and the water will naturally flow beck to the basin. The pond and channel water course will
provide an attractive water ameeity adjacent to future open play and picnic areas.
AMENDMENT NO. 01 TO CONTRACT ORDER NO. 16397
Parkview Site Imprtwement Project
Febvmty 28. 1995
The Agreement dated October 11. 1994 between the City of Temecula, and l~M Design Croup.
Inc.. (herehalter referred to as "Agreement") is hereby mended as follows:
Re: ADDITIONAL SERVICES
~qection 1
Scope of Work is hereby amended to include the additional services as described in the attached
Exhibit 'A". :
Compensation for these additional services is a not to exceed $66,300, as described in Exhibit
"A ". B. llng and payment for these services shah be in conformante with the original contract
between the parties.
Section 2
All other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain the same.
The paxties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date and year above written.
CONSISTANT
CITY OFTEMECULA
By:
RJM Design Group, Inc.
Robert I. Mueting, President
By:
Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor
ATTEST:
Peter Thorson, City Attorney
June S. Greek, City Clerk
o21ee$
Exhibit "A" Page i of 1Z
DESCRIFflON
PHASEI
1.0
A.
OF SERVICES
RESOURCE DOCUMENTATION
One kickoff meeting with City staff (Feb. 13, 1995) m review the project scope; refine
time schedules; discuss upper pond and creek enhancement and improvement parameters.
Obtain documentation available from the City pex~:aining to this project (including
topographic and boundary survey, soils investigation and title repon).
Acquire base map and resource information from City.
In general, we anticipate the following resources will be necessary to be furnished by the
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
These items have been expressly excluded from our scope of services.
Environmental studies and Environmental Impact Report.
Existing hydrology studies.
Existing siltation study.
Pond imlwovement studies.
Financing plan.
Creek "As-Built" Plans.
Aerial Topography/Contour Map/Project Boundaries/Existing Utilities Plans.
Review State and local codes and standards applicable to site development.
MEETINGS:
PRODUCTS:
(1) - Kickoff meeting with key players to obtain documentation and
establish project schedule.
Updated schedule
Page 2 of I
2,0 DET~krt.ED SITE ANALYSIS
Our next task will be to physically review, analyze, and document existing site assets and
deficiencies. The ~gtysis of the site and surrounding relationhips shall also be reviewed in
regard to the potential in~o. rtance of phasing for ~ and future construction.
A. Conduct field review and analysis of existing site conditiom. Photo document site.
Review and Research !~.xistln~ Drnin~i,e R~orts: Consultant shall provide
research and investigation to compile existing literature and reports previously
prepared regarding the tributary watershed and drainage systems impacting the
Parkview site located in the City of Temecula. Research shall include review of
previous engineering hydrology studies which specifically encompass or address
the site. Excluded from this scope of services is a sedime~ transport study.
Based on our review of the scope of work that J.F.Davidson is currently under:
contract with the City of Temecula, it appears that a sediment trampon study is
currently being prepared. Additional information to be reviewed includes
historical flooding records and improvement plans. Work under this task will also
include compiling flood control and drainage criteria for the project as specified
by the City of Temecula and the Riverside County Flood Control and Water
Conservation District.
B. Produce site analysis/opportunities and constraints exhibit with existing utilities.
C. Review existing hydrology study(s).
D. Review existing Siltation Plan.
E. Calculate storm water and siltation expected through creek system.
F. Review Gootechnical Report as provided by the City.
Review existing biological assessments and wetlands delineation. Conduct additional on-
site surveys to update existing reports for submittal and processing of permit applications
for Section 404 (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Nationwide Permit) and Section 1601
(California Depaxtment of Fish and Game Streambed Alteration Agr~ment).
PRODUCTS: Opportunities and constraints/sit~ analysis/utilities availability map, base
map at appropriate scale.
rark-vimv SUe Upper Pond/Crick Sire Projset
City of Temscula/559-04=3
Pa~3
Page 3 of I
3.0
A.
SCItEMATIC DESIGN
r)ebris b~in Conc~t: Provide professional engineering services relative to the
development of a design concept for an expanded desilting facility upstream of Village
Lake. Based upon the information gathered in Phase 1.0 and 2.0, a design concept
debris/desilting facility will be developed using the research data for sedixnent yield and
creek hydraulics. The design coneept for the debris/desilting facility will examine several
alternatives including:
· Enlarging the existing basin
· Modifying the existing outlet works
· Constructing additional desilting rarities
The selected concept design will be reviewed with the City for approval prior to
proceeding with the design development phase of the project. As indicated above, it is-
assumed that hydtologic (hydtograph), hydrnlic and sediment yield/delivery information
is available for the creek.
Prepare Schematic Design and Plans relative to.the Upper Retention Pond and Creek
adjacent the CRC including:
1. Intended Uses - for aesthetics, storm water conveyance and for promotion of
water quality in Main Lake by interception/removal of debris and alesilting basin
and by aerating effect of recirculated water on the stream.
2. Area section, configuration, water depths of strenm-~ and ponds.
3. Seepage control lining, stream edge treatment, bottom treatment, rocks and
4. Storm flow capacity, erosion and storm drainage, debris clean-up.
5. Recirculation pumping system, intake and discharge structures, aesthetic flows,
etC.
6. Electrical, water supply, overflow drain, etc.
7. Water safety and mnintennnce.
Provide an estimate of probable construction and m~intenence cost for the proposed pond
and creek development.
Prepare and submit permit applications for Section 404 CU.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Nationwide Permit) and Section 1601 (California Depatiment of Fish and Game
Streambed Alteration Agreement). Provide consultation during negotiations with
Agencies.
Pati~mv ~t, Upper Pond/Crmk ~ Projmt
City of Tsnmmla/559-04=3
Page 4 of 11
Conduct meeting with the City staff, to review and discuss Schematic Proposals.
Refute Schematic Plans based on staff input.
IVIEETINGS: (1) - City staff meeting
PRODUCTS: Schematic layout plans of the upper pond, creek and
restoration/revegetation.
associated
4.0 DESIGN DEVELO~
The fourth task of our services shall be to prepare all preliminary plans and cost analysis based
upon the aspproved schematic design documents in order.to fix and describe the scope and
character of the entire Project, including landscape architectural, environmental, civil, structural, -
mechanical, electrical and water systems, materials and such other elements as may be
appropriate. Comideration shall be given to availabfiity of materials, equipment and labor,
construction sequencing and scheduling, economic analysis of construction, user safety and
maintenance requirements, and energy conservation. Final selection of materials, textures, and
colors shall occur.
Prepare final designs and plans relative to site, environmental, structural, electrical, and
mechanical engineering associated to the proposed project.
B. Prepare probable estimates of construction and maintenance costs per square foot.
C. Submit final design for staff review prior to construction drawings.
PRODUCTS:
Refined preliminary plans, refined cost analysis, refined mechanical and
electrical systems, preliminary civil plans, material cut sheets and cost
estimate.
S.0 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMI~Vf PHASE
The final Construction Document Phase of the project consists of the preparation of the
construction documents to include final drawings, specifications, calculations, and final cost
estimates. Our proposal includes water feature and engineering services required to execute the
project and minimal erosion control landscape improvements. Specifically, we have included the
following disciplines.
A. Landscape Architectural/Site Development
B. Wa~er Feature Development
PaAvlmv me Unar remi/Creal Site Proira
City of Temeoula559-04-3
Page 5 of 11
'C. Civil Engine'in4
Debris/Desilting Improvement piawt~
Consultant shall prepare debris/desilting improvement plans based on the design
concept approved in Phase 3.0 in accordance with the appropriate governmental
jurisdictional agencies grading ordinance. The plans shall include the design of
fini.~hed grades for the basin and spillway devices.
Ch,nnol Improvement Plans
Based on the information gathered in previous phases, Consultant shall prepare
an improvement plan within the existing channel to provide for a *low-flow"
meandering lined channel approximately 3' wide for use as a recirculating water
feature in conjunction with the development of the Parkview site. The channel
is anticipated to be lippl'O:timnteJy 1,000' in length commeDCblg ~t the exist~Dg
Lake Village desilting basin and extending eastward to the proposed desnting.
basin. Any inczease to the length witl be considered a revision to this scope of
work and will be covered under a separate agreement for an additional fee.
D. Structural Engineering
E. Mechanical Engineering
F. Electrical Engineering
Technical Specifications
Prepare technical specifications conforming with the most recent applicable standards and
specifications from:
· City of Temecula "boilerplate" provided by the City for:
-General Conditions
-Special Provisions
-Notice Inviting Bids, Contract Agreement, Bid Bonds, Instructions to
Bidders, Proposal Requirements and Conditions.
· City of Temecula Standard Plans and Specifications
· Standard Speci~catiom for Public Works Construction ("Greenbook"), latest
edition.
· State of California Standard Specifications and Standard Plans, latest edition.
During this phase, the Contna Doannents are prepared setting forth in detail the requirements
for the cousuuction of the project. General conditions, instructions to bidders, and all special
requirements are defined, and when combined with the various trade specifications, a complete
project manual is produced.
Parkvkw SiS UmMr l*md/Crml ~tm Prmjm
City of Ten~mla/SSg-04-3
page 6 of 11
6.0 BIDDING PHASE
mddi~ Procedur~
The Consultant shall assist the City with the Bidding Phase of the project. Questions,
clarificatiom, or conflicts arising out of the bidding process will be resolved by addenda prepared
by the Consultant (maximum (2) two addenda). Addenda to the contract for construction shall
be prepared in writing to document any clarification or modification made to the contract
documents.
7.0 CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION PHASE
The Consultant Design Team shall conduct eight weekly job site meetings to generally review and
evaluate the construction schedule, monitor performance, review quality control standards, and -
provide assistance for any clarification or revision to the contract for construction. Shop
drawings and related submittals shall be reviewed and returned to the consultant for appropriate
action. The Contractor' s requests for information, proposal requests, and related commxlnications
shall be attended to on a regular basis. Contractor's pay requests shall be reviewed by the
Consultant on a monthly basis in accordance with the ~mount of work completed and in
accordance with the contract documents. At every job site meeting, minutes shall be prepared,
published and distributed by the Consultant to all parties concerned, specifically noting current
action items and related responsib~ities.
Upon completion of the Construction Phase the Consultant shall organize and conduct a final
walk-through and review. A final punch list for all required corrections and remaining work
shall be prepared.
During the Construction Phase of the project, the following services shall be furnished:
Precomtruetion Conference
A preconstruction conference shall be organized and conducted to brief all parties concerned with
general and special requirements of the contract for construction. Procedural matters, muting
of information, and project representatives shall be defined. Attendees shall include
representatives from the City's staff, the Consultant, the Contractor, and all major subcontractors.
Job Site Meetings
Job site meetings (total of 8) shall be scheduled and conducted by the Comultant for the same day
and time through the duration of the project. Scheduling, coordination, requests for information,
and changes to the contract for comtruction are routindy monitored. The Comultant shall
publish and distribute a field report for each job site meeting, documenting the progress of
construction and specifically noting current and delinquent action items.
City of Temecg~559.04-3
Pele7
Page 7 of 12
Submittal and Shop Drawing Review
The Consultant shall review all required shop drawings and related submittals as required by the
contract documents.
Project CloseOut
At the completion of the Construction Phase a final job site meeting and review of the entire
facility shall be conducted. A final punch list will be published and distributed by the Consultant
to all parties concerned, specifically noting required corrections, non-conforming work, and work
remaining to be completed.
city of Tsmmda/559-04-3
Page 8 of 1]
SECTION
spprosch m the development of the PARK'v'IBW LTPF, R POND AND CREEK
IMPIO~ PROJECT. Fees for Phsse Ind Phsse 1I sre ss follows:
PHASB II: DesiSn and Construction rm~.mven,- fbr dam Upper Pond and Creek
T,u,rw, Ovehxe~S
1.0 R,m.Ko DocF,u.~0cm
2.0 Dmikd Sits Andyah
3.0 Schedule- Design
4.0 !:ksiSnDsv~u,,~
5.0 CoasmscdoaDoc,wmf,
6.0 Biddies
7.0 Coastnsctloa~a
$1o,.~o.
$ MOO.
S30,'700.
hourly u requested
OramJ Fee Total $66,300.
8.2
8.3
/bdmbsmamt Allm
olu order to save com~lewt mark,up on reproplphlc, printins, pimto2raphic, and ddlvefy
.axis" -we. it b our suipSim thli s Tomerods acemat be established at · local blueprint company
fur ths PARK~qKW UPPER POND AND CRwmu( IMPROVEMENT PROJECT. Titis will
ave the city approxinmtdy 10-20~, city disc~mt and m:msultmt
ADDITIONAL SERVICES
Services which are not speclfka!ly ideadried be~ein a~ services to be performed by 1UM Dett~
0fmap or i~ consultants are considered "Additional Services* for purposes of thia Agreeremit.
Trio City ms,/request that R.TM Desip Croup pro'form setvies which ate Additlosul
Services..However, RJM Desip hp b not obligat~J to pafOrm such Additiond Services
till]eft gl smefidm~w tO t~ AJTGelliefit h,M beefl fully executed settiq forth the scope, schedole
mid fee Eor auch AddltkmaJ Services. In the ovent RJM DeSjSn Group performs Addj~ona]
~efvicM before receipt of fach execumd ,~,e,4m~t the (~y Icknowledge~ iU oblipdon ~o ~y
for such eervjces ~t RIM Design Group's stndml rKes, within 30 days of receipt of PjM Dmifn
Ths bliowinf items shall not be a part of the be identified in the payment section above,
shsll be reimbursable to K1M DesiF: Group.
A. Additional meetings sad de visits as authorized by the City of Temecula.
B. Prqmrsdon of eddhional Topofrsphic and Boundary in.formation.
Pale~
Page 9 of 11
6.4
Environmental Impact Report or CEQA documentation, if required, shall be provided
under separate contract.
Soils engineering and geoteclmical report, aerial topography, potholing utilities,
construction staking, drainage facilities plan preparation (street inlets, catch basim),
shoring plan preparation or review, utility relocation plans, legal descriptions and
exhibits, and application fees, specific plan modification or amendment.
RJM Design Group shall provide the necessary plan check revisions requested by the
city for two plan check reviews. All subsequent changes shall be done in accordance
with the attached Standard Hourly Fee Schedule.
CITY KESPONSIBILITIES
A. City shall provide access to the site.
City shall provide an up-to-date ti~e report.
City is to provide any and all indemnification, abatement, disposal or other actions
required by local, state or federal law regarding hazardous materials.
D. City shall pay all governmental fees and costs.
City shall require any construction contractors to indemnify Consultant from any and all
losses, damages, clnlm~, expellses, including attorney fees, and costs arising out of the
contractor's work, excepting only losses, damages, clsint% expenses including atwmey's
fees and costs which are caused by the sole negligence or willful mi-~conduct of RIM
Design Group and/or subconsultants in performing its services under this agreement.
City will require that the construction contractors add RIM Design Group and
subconsultants (Consultant) as an additional insured in the comprehensive general
liability, auw liability, workers' compensation and builder risk insurance coverages
required by the City.
hrbiew Sire Upper PoaVCml Sits
Civy of Temsouh559-04-3
Page 10 of 1~
6.5
STANDARD HOURLY FEE SCHEDULE
The Client agrees to pay Consultaut as compensation for
all ~nthorized work included in
the Scope of Services heretofore stated, at the hourly rates below.
PRINCIPAL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
LANDSCAPE ARCBITECT
DESIGNER
SENIOR DRAFFSPERSON
JUNIOR DRAFTSPERSON
FIELD OBSERVATION
WORD PROCESSOR
$100.00 Per hour
$88.00 per hour
$82.00 per hour
$55.00 per hour
$48.00 per hour
$88'.00 per hour
$35.00 per hour
Billings for all time and materials and contract extension work shall b~ in accordance with the
level of work performed and will be broken into the categories listed above.
FF.F. I~SCAI .ATION:
Fees will be escalated each August 1st in accordance with any increase in the Consumer's Price
Index or other mutually agreed upon cost index. Beglnnin~ with August 1, 1995.
All provisions for escalations stated, pertain to all contract extension and additional work.
Perk~w Site UFFm' PemVCree~ Site Projet
City of Temm~SS9-04-3
Page 11
Page 11 ox io
PRELIMINARY SCHEDULE (Upper Pond and Creek Improvements)
MONTHS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 g 9 10 11
PHASE 1
TASK 1.0 Re~our~Coorm,~inn
TASK 2.0 Dmiled Si~Analy~
TASK 3.0 S~ ~n
En~n~ ~sing
T ASK 4.0 ~ ~vel~t
TASK 5.0 Co~cfl~
Ci~ Review ~d ~pmv~
TASK 6.0 Bid~g
TASK 7.0 Cons~cfl~
~DA~/~GS~
1
4
IllIll
I 2 34 567 8
IL-
Review base information, existing site conditions,
utilities, easements, project schedule.
Review schematic design with Oty.
Submit final design plans and materials prior to
development of construction doeinherits.
Submit 75% conslrdction drawings.
6
7
8
Submit 100% conslxuction drawings for formal plan
check.
Obtain State and Federal permit
Commence bidding procedures.
Commence construction.
ITEM 4
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY~~
FINANCE OFFICE
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
Board of Directors
FROM:
Ronald E. Bradley, General Manager
DATE:
February 28, 1995
SUBJECT:
PREPARED BY: ~
RECOMMENDATION:
Santa Gertrudis Creek Trail - Final Agreement With Riverside
County Rood Control.
Beryl Yasinosky, Management Assistant
That the Board of Directors:
Approve the Agreement between the City of Temecula and Riverside County-
Flood Control to utilize the Santa Gertrudis Channel Improvements for
Recreational Trail purposes.
Appropriate $25,000 in Public Facilities - Development Impact .Fees for the
necessary trail improvements.
BACKGROUND: Assessment District 161 recently completed channel
improvements within the Santa Gertrudis Creek and is currently in the process of transferring
the responsibility of this channel to Riverside County Flood Control. As part of the
improvements, the District constructed asphalt paved access roads along the upper
embankment of the channel. During the approximate two years of construction activity, the
roadways remained open for heavy equipment. In addition, the access roads have also
become a favorite route of travel for pedestrians, joggers and bicyclists living in the area.
While much enthusiasm exists from the community to keep this area open for trail purposes,
Flood Control has made it clear that they intend to close the channel to the public unless an
agreement can be reached with the City to leave this area open for non-motorized trail use.
Over the last several months, staff has met with representatives of Riverside County Rood
Control, Supervisor Bob Buster's Office, Riverside County Parks Commission and citizens of
the community concerning this matter. Staff has also received direction from the City's Risk
Management Representative. Pursuant to these discussions, a receive and file report was
presented to the Community Services Commission on January 9, 1995, which identified the
a proposed agreement between the City of Temecula and Riverside County Flood Control to
utilize the Santa Gertrudis Channel Improvements for recreational trail purposes.
Subsequently, the City Attorney, Riverside County Flood Control and County Counsel have
concurred on the final format of the Trail Agreement. On February, 13, 1995, the Community
Services Commission approved the Trail Agreement, a copy of which is attached for your
review.
r:~ymbtd/~dtgrl.otd 02~95
Pursuant to the Trail Agreement, the City will be responsible for maintaining and developing
the Santa Gertrudis Creek for non-motorizad recreational trail uses that are compatible with
the purpose of the flood control channel improvements. Although the County of Riverside has
determined that the riparian corridor is not compatible with the proposed trail, the Agreement
will insure that these uses are on opposite sides of the channel. Therefore, the use of the
facility will be concentrated to the south side of the channel improvements, which currently
extend approximately two (2) miles westerly from Joseph Road to Ynez Road·
While this portion of the Santa Gertrudis Creek provides an integral portion of the City's future
trail system, staff is also concerned about mitigating certain safety and liability issues that will
be incurred by the City upon acceptance of this area. While it has been determined that most
of the safety issues will be addressed by adding signage, striping, directional arrows and
fencing in some areas, of utmost concern is that the proposed trail route crosses Winchester
Road (Highway 79 North). On January 12, 1995, staff met with Riverside County
Transportation to discuss the viability of routing pedestrians and bicyclists under Winchester
Road· Although it has been determined that an underpass could be constructed in
concurrence with the widening of the new bridge, these improvements may be two years
away. Until such time, staff has determined that trail users will be directed along an asphalt
path to cross Winchester Road at the traffic signal located at Nicolas Road.
Upon final approval of the Agreement by the Board of Directors, the document will be
forwarded to the Riverside County Board of Supervisors for approval· Once the Agreement
has been approved by Riverside County, the City will be able to begin enhancing the Channel'
for trail use. It is anticipated that the Channel may be opened by the City as a recreational
trail in April or May, 1995.
FISCAL IMPACT: There would be no costs associated with entering into a license
agreement with Riverside County Flood Control for the use of the channel. Maintenance costs
are assumed to be limited to street sweeping at least once per week and patching of the
asphalt paving, as necessary. Costs associated with the maintenance of this area will be
provided through the TCSD Rates and Charges for City-wide Parks and Services.
However, there would be costs associated with improving the channel for trail use. Costs for
the striping of the southerly portion of the access road are estimated at 07,500 and will
include a 4" solid white thermoplastic edgeline and a 4" yellow skip centerline· An additional
05,000 will be necessary to provide adequate signage and stenciling of the trail route. For
safety reasons, approximately 02,500 would be necessary to provide barricades in certain
areas along the channel embankment, and to prevent motorized recreational vehicles from
accessing the trail. The asphalt path along both sides of Winchester Road, linking the trail to
the Nicolas Road traffic signal, is estimated at 010,000. Costs related to the proposed
undercrossing at the future Winchester Road Bridge are unknown at this time.
Upon acceptance of this area by the City, and completion of the trail improvements, this trail
will be indemnified by the Insurance Company of the West.
ATTACHMENTS:
Santa Gertrudis Creek Channel Agreement.
Site/Location Map.
Community Services Commission Report dated 2/13/95.
o2395
1
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
AGREEMENT REGARDING USE OF THE
SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK CHANNEL
FOR RECREATIONAL PURPOSES
The RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER
CONSERVATION DISTRICT, hereinafter referred to as "DISTRICT", and
the CITY OF TEMECULA, hereinafter referred to as "CITY", hereby
agree as follows:
RECITALS
DISTRICT owns and operates the SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK
CHANNEL, including the access roads adjoining the CHANNEL,
hereinafter referred to as CHANNEL located in the City of
Temecula. CHANNEL is an essential and integral part of
DISTRICT'S collection and disposal system of flood and surface
waters within the area. This use is sporadic in nature, thereby..
allowing compatible uses by CITY for recreation purposes.
In order to provide for public use of CHANNEL, CITY is
agreeable to provide maintenance made necessary by CITY'S
recreational use of CHANNEL and to develop the property for
recreational use which is compatible with the primary purpose of
CHANNEL.
The County of Riverside, acting on behalf of
Assessment District 161, has constructed or will construct a
riparian mitigation corridor in the bottom of CHANNEL as
mitigation for vegetation removed during CHANNEL construction.
The County of Riverside has the obligation to install, maintain
and monitor said corridor for a period of five years after
1
2
3
4
5
6
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
installation or until such time as the regulatory agencies tha~~.,
required the corridor relieve the County of such responsibility.
The riparian corridor and recreational uses proposed under the
agreement are not compatible, overlapping uses and are intended
to occur on opposites sides of the channel bottom.
AGREEMENT
IT IS AGREED by the parties as follows:
1. DISTRICT agrees:
A. TO grant to CITY a license to use said CHANNEL
for recreational purposes which are not
incompatible with DISTRICT'S primary flood
control purpose and which do not interfere
with or impair the DISTRICT'S ability to ~
operate and maintain CHANNEL or any of its
appurtenant works. Said license shall remain
in effect indefinitely so long as CITY'S use
of CHANNEL right of way is so limited.
B. To give written notice to CITY of any use
being made of CHANNEL right of way by CITY not
in conformity with this agreement or which
could adversely affect flo6d control functions
of CHANNEL, and grant to CITY thirty (30) days
from and after such notice to correct any such
nonconforming use.
To perform maintenance resulting from
DISTRICT'S operation of CHANNEL.
-2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
24
25
26
27
28
CITY agrees:
A. That prior to any modification of CHANNEL to
submit to DISTRICT plans for any work and/or
improvements to CHANNEL for review and
approval and to pay DISTRICT the cost of
reviewing said plans.
B. To assume the obligation to provide any
maintenance associated with CITY'S use of
CHANNEL and all liability in conjunction with
the recreational use including claims of third
persons for injury or death or damage to
property. Said obligation shall not include
any inverse condemnation liability of DISTRICT
by reason of the location of CHANNEL or
DISTRICT'S improvements thereto unless such
liability is the result of CITY'S operations
or use of the property by the public pursuant
to CITY'S actual or tacit consent.
C. In exercising its right to use CHANNEL for
recreational purposes not incompatible with
the primary purpose of CHANNEL, CITY may
install such improvements and/or e~uipment
therein as it deems appropriate for the said
recreational purposes.
D. If CITY should inst'all any improvements and/or
equipment or if CITY uses or allows use of
-3-
1
4
CHANNEL which, in the opinion of the General
Manager-Chief Engineer, would be detrimental
to the operation of CHANNEL, it will, upon
written request of the General Manager-Chief
5
Engineer, remove said improvements and/or
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
equipment or cease said use. In conjunction
with said improvements and/or equipment, CITY
waives any right it may from time to time have
against DISTRICT for damage to such
improvements and personalty from time to time
situated in CHANNEL that results from the
operation and use of CHANNEL by DISTRICT.
In its use of CHANNEL under the rights hereir
granted, CITY agrees to promptly repair any
damage occurring to DISTRICT'S improvements
within CHANNEL, unless such damage is' caused
by DISTRICT'S operation, maintenance or
19
improvements to its facilities within CHANNEL
20
property.
21
IT IS MUTUALLY agreed that:
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Each party hereto shall indemnify, defend, save and
hold harmless the other party of and from any and all liability,
claims, demands, debts, losses or suits for damages to other
parties for personal injury or property damage, arising out of or
in any manner connected with the performance of the duties and ~i
obligations of such indemnifying party hereunder.
-4-
1
2
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Any and all notices sent or required to be sent to the
parties to this agreement will be mailed to the following
addresses:
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL
AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
1995 Market Street
Riverside, CA 92501
CITY OF TEMECULA
CITY CLERK
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92591
//
//
-5-
1
2
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
IN WITNESS WEEOF, the parties hereto have executed
this agreement on ·
(to be filled in by Clerk of the Board)
RECOMENDED FOR APPROVAL:
KENNETH L. EDW/tRDS
General Manager-Chief Engineer
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL
AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
By:
CHAI~, BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ATTEST:
WILLIAM C. KATZENSTEIN
County Counsel
By: ~ Deputy
Dated: J ~ ~ o ~q ~"
GERALD A. MALONEY
Clerk of the Board
By:
Deputy
(SEAL)
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
RON ROBERTS, Mayor
ATTEST:
PETER THORSON
City Attorney
BY:Dp~u/ty~ ~'
Dated:
DFG:bjp
rcfc\257
30Jan95
JUNE GREEK
City Clerk
By:
Deputy
(SEAL)
-6-
I
I'
..h,/· · ml '
·
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
Community Services Commission
Shawn D. Nelson, Director of Community Services
February 13, 1995
Santa Gertrudis Creek Trail - Final Agreement With
County Flood Control.
Riverside
PREPARED BY:
RECOMMENDATION:
t~,Beryl Yasinosky, Management Assistant
That the Community Services Commission:
Receive and file this report regarding the final agreement between the City of Temecula and
Riverside County Flood Control to utilize the Santa Gertrudis Channel Improvements for
Recreational Trail purposes.
BACKGROUND: Subsequent to the Community Services Commission Meeting on
January 9, 1995, staff is pleased to report that the City Attorney, Riverside County Counsel,
and Flood Control have concurred upon the final format of a trail agreement which will provide
for the recreational trail use of Assessment District 1 61 Channel Improvements within Santa
Gertrudis Creek. A copy of this Agreement has been attached for your review.
Pursuant to the Agreement, the City will be responsible for maintaining and developing the
Santa Gertrudis Creek for non-motorized recreational trail uses that are compatible with the
purpose of the flood control channel improvements. Although the County of Riverside has
determined that the riparian corridor is not compatible with the proposed trail, the Agreement
will insure that these uses are on opposite sides of the channel. Therefore, the recreational
use of this facility will be concentrated on the south side of the channel improvements, which
currently extend approximately two miles westerly from Joseph Road to Ynez Road.
While this portion of the Santa Gertrudis Creek provides an integral portion of the City's future
trail system, staff is also concerned about mitigating certain safety and liability issues that will
be incurred by the City upon acceptance of this area. While most liability issues will be
addressed by adding signage, striping, directional arrows and fencing in some areas, the
utmost concern is that the proposed trail route crosses Winchester Road (Highway 79 North).
Therefore, on January 12, 1995, staff met with Riverside County Transportation to discuss
the viability of routing pedestrians and bicyclists under Winchester Road. Although it has been
determined that an underpass could be constructed in concurrence with the widening of the
new bridge, these improvements may be two years away. Until such time, staff has
determined that trail users will be directed to cross Winchester Road at the traffic signal
located at Nicolas Road.
The Agreement will be forwarded to the TCSD Board of Directors for approval on February 28,
1995. Staff will forward the signed Agreement to the Riverside County Board of Supervisors
for final approval. Upon notification of approval of the Agreement by Riverside County, the
City will be able to begin enhancing the Channel for trail use. It is anticipated that the channel
c~vesboblc~'knletr.a¢ Q~1395
will opened by the City as a recreational trail no later than April 19, 1995.
FISCAL IMPACT: There would be no costs associated with entering into a license
agreement with Riverside County Flood Control for use of the channel. Maintenancecosts are
assumed to be limited to street sweeping at least once per week and patching of the asphalt
paving as necessary.
However, there would be costs associated with improving the channel for trail use. Costs for
striping the asphalt access road are estimated at approximately ~7,500 and will include a 4"
solid white thermoplastic edgeline and a 4" yellow skip centerline. An additional $5,000 will
be necessary to provide adequate signage and stenciling of the trail. For safety reasons,
approximately $2,500 would be necessary to provide barricades in certain areas along the
channel embankment, and to prevent motorized recreational vehicles from accessing the trail.
Costs related to the proposed undercrossing at the future Winchester Road Bridge are
unknown at this time.
Upon completion of the trail improvements, this trail will be indemnified by the Insurance
Company of the West.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Santa Gertrudis Creek Channel Agreement.
2. Community Services Commission Report dated 1/9/95.
r:.\v~inobk'~Inlu. r.c~ 0~1395
DEPARTMENTAL
REPORT
CITY A TTORAN~'ROV~
FINANCE OFFICE~
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
Board of Directors
FROM:
Ronald E. Bradley, General Manager
DATE:
February 28, 1995
SUBJECT: Departmental Report
PREPARED BY: ~ Shawn D. Nelson, Director of Community Services
DISCUSSION: The City Council awarded a design services contract to the Alhambra
Group for the Master Plan of the Margarita Road Park Site. Development of this 20 acre site
will provide additional active/passive park land to the City's park system. Staff will begin the
master plan process and form a Project Committee to facilitate this process. :
The joint-use agreement and the design services contract for the Temecula Middle Schod
Lighting Project was approved by the Board of Directors at the December 20, 1994 meeting.
Staff is now working with the design consultant to prepare plans and specifications to
facilitate a public bid process. It is anticipated that this project will be out to bid in the next
90 to 120 days.
Loma Linda Park Project - Phase II has completed the 90 day maintenance period and is now
open to the public. This second phase increased Loma Linda Park by approximately one acre
and includes a tot lot, open play areas, picnic facilities, landscaping and irrigation.
The contractor has nearly completed construction on the Restroom/Snack Bar facility at Kent
Hintergardt Memorial Park. It is estimated that this project will be completed in March, 1995.
Staff met with representatives from the Temecula Valley Museum and the design consultants
to discuss construction phasing of the various elements. The museum is hoping to begin their
renovation of St. Cstherine's Church in March, 1995. Construction is estimated to take 90
days. The City will solicit bids for the park improvements and begin construction when the
church renovations are nearly completed. The museum will also be moving forward with plot
plan approval and anticipates beginning construction for the new museum facility after
completion of the church renovation.
Staff will request that the Board of Directors award a design contract to RJM Design Group
to prepare construction documents and project administration for Phase II of the Parkview Site
Project, which will provide a smaller retention pond and channel improvements adjacent to the
existing desiltstion lake at the Sports Park. This project will allow staff the ability to better
maintain the silt that is collected in the smaller pond, while improving the quality of the water.
With the completion of the Youth Soccer and Pop Warner Football seasons, staff has begun
the process of renovating various park facilities. The renovation time frames will be completed
in conjunction with the annual master calendar for the City's park system approved by the
Sports Council. Also, Little League has begun practicing throughout the various parks and
schools in the City.
ITEM 1
REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY
· "APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
AGENDA REPORT
Executive Director/Redevelopment Agency Members
Mary Jane McLarney, Assistant City Manager
February 28, 1995
Consideration of RDA Commercial Rehabilitation Small Business
Loan
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council consider approval of an RDA commercial rehabilitation loan to
The Blind Pig Brewing Co., Inc., located at 42387 Avenida Alvarado, Suite 108,
Temecula, CA 92590.
DISCUSSION:
The City has received an application from The Blind Pig Brewing Co., Inc. to expand
their existing brewing business by way of a bottling line, and brew pub. The business
is owned by Vincent Cilurzo and David Stovall, and the property is currently being
leased for a term exceeding the proposed loan. The loan amount requested is
$100,000.
The purpose of this loan is to allow expansion of the existing capacity of the brewery,
purchase a bottling line and all the necessary appurtenant components, and to create
a brew pub/tasting room which is easily accessible to the public. This will allow the
business regional expansion, and increased sales by almost 400%.
The total cost requirement for the expansion is estimated at $150,000, in which the
additional $50,000 is being raised via personal and outside investments. To date,
approximately $16,000 in personal investment has been made on this expansion, and
another $25,000 has been raised. The remaining $9,000 will also be made as a
personal investment should the loan be approved.
The terms of the loan are as follows: 9100,000 amortized over a 10 year period with
payments of 91,377.50. The loan is secured by all existing equipment, and all new
equipment purchased for the expansion. The loan will be in a first lien position with
a $160,000 second being carried by a private party.
The business contends that since the time of application, the brewery has received 27
new customers, and has contracts to install keg taps in four additional restaurants
upon their completion.
This loan package has been reviewed by the City's independent bank representative.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
The loan approval would be subject to receipt of the secondary note showing a five
year term, and no prepayment option, a detailed list of the existing equipment
(including but not limited to serial numbers, description, and estimated worth),and an
updated UCC3 search showing no recent liens.
FISCAL IMPACT:
To date the City has funded 9109,400 in Redevelopment loans with an addition~il
$100,000 approved but not funded.