Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout022895 CC AgendaIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to I~articipete in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (909) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104ADA Trtle II] AGENDA TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL A REGULAR MEETING COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER 30875 RANCHO VISTA ROAD FEBRUARY 28, 1995 - 7:00 PM 5:30 PM - Spedel Meeting Clomld Seadon of the City Councg pursuant to Govemment Code Sections: 1. §54956.9(b), Polemid Utigsdon, two matters. 2. 954956.8, CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR, Property: 43106 Business Park Ddve; Negotiating pardes: City of Temectda and Grubb and B~s: Under negotiation: prim and terms of payment. At approximately 9:45 PM, the City Council will determine which of the remaining agenda items can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00 PM and may continue all other items on which additional time is required until a future meeting. All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 PM. CALL TO ORDER: Invocation: Flag Salute: ROLL CALL: PRESENTATIONS/ PROCLAMATIONS Next in Order: Ordinance: No. 95-04 Resolution: No. 95-14 Mayor Jeffrey Stone presiding Bishop Konrad Lee, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans Lindemans, Mu~oz, Parks, Roberts, Stone Commendation - Frank Hammersley, Community Pantry R:~&eeede~0,121N$ I PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Council on items that are not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council on an item not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items a 'Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk before the Council gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made at this time. A total, not to exceed, ten (10) minutes will be devoted to these reports. CONSENT CALENDAR 2 3 Standard Ordinance Adootion Procedure RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the minutes of January 30, 1995. 2.2 Approve the minutes of January 31, 1995. Resolution Aoorovina List of Demands RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Adopt a resolution emitled: RESOLUTION NO. 95- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A R:~/~emle~022116 2 4 Mid-Year Budget Review RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 95- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET 4.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 95- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA REVISING THE SCHEDULE OF AUTHORIZED POSITIONS 5 Release Labor and Material and Monument Bonds in Tract No. 23267-1 RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Authorize the release of Labor and Material Bond for Street, Water, and Sewer Improvements, and the Monument Bond in Tract No. 23267-1; 5.2 Direct the City Clerk to so notify the Developer and Surety. 6 Release Labor and Material and Monument Bonds in Tract No. 23267-4 RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Authorize the release of Labor and Material Bond for Street, Water and Sewer Improvements, and the Monument Bond in Tract No. 23267-4; 6.2 Direct the City Clerk to so notify the Developer and Surety. 7 8 Pro0ram Suoolement No. 005 to the Local Aoencv/State Aoreement for Federal-Aid Projects for the Traffic Sional at Margarita Road and Avenida Barca IPW93-10) RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Adopt e resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 95- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT NO. 005, TO LOCAL AGENCY/STATE AGREEMENT NO. 08-5459, BETWEEN THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR FEDERAL AID PROJECT NO. STPLG-5459(005), MARGARITA ROAD AND AVENIDA BARCA Comoletion and Acceptance of the Ynez Road Landscaoe Imorovements, No. PW94-04 RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 Accept the Ynez Road Landscape Improvements, Project No. PW94-04, as complete and direct the City Clerk to: File the Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a one (1) year Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract; Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after the filing of the Notice of Completion if no liens have been filed. Focused Model Develooment (Traffic - SWAPD) RECOMMENDATION: 9.1 Approve the four (4) party agreement - Cities of Temecula, Murrieta, Westem Riverside Council of Governments, and Hank Mohle and Associates Agreement for Professional Services, Southwest Area Planning District (SWAPD) Traffic Study - Focused Model Development. 9.2 Authorize the Mayor or his designated representative to sign the agreement. 9.3 Award of contract is subject to approval of Mid-Year Budget request of $12,500 for that purpose. 10 11 Review and Aooroval of 21 st Year FY 95-96 Community Development Block Grant AppliCatiOnS RECOMMENDATION: 10.1 Review and provide direction to staff as to the funding of projects for the 21st Year FY 95-96 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program. 10.2 Authorize staff to forward the selected CDBG project applications to the Riverside County Economic Development Agency (EDA). Professional Services for the Desion of an Interim Traffic Sional for the Intersection of State Route 79(S) with Maraarita Road\Redhawk Parkway. Pal Road and La Paz Street RECOMMENDATION: " 11.1 Approve Professional Services Agreements for the deign of an interim traffic signal for the intersections of State Route 79{S): · Margarita Road\Redhawk Pkwy BRW, Inc. $5,474.00 · Pala Road Albert Grover & Assoc. $5,230.00 · La Paz Street Transtech $5,065.00 12 Temecula Community Partnership RECOMMENDATION: 12.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 95- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA TO ADOPT AND SUPPORT THE PREVENTION GOALS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP PUBLIC HEARINGS Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing. 13 Planning Aoolication No, PA94-0062. Pulte Home CORD, RECOMMENDATION: 13.1 Read by title only and introduce an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 95- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 213, AMENDMENT NO. 2 (PA94-0062); AMENDING SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 213 TO CHANGE THE ZONING FOR PLANNING AREA 11 (32 ACRES) FROM VERY HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (14-20 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE WITH A MAXIMUM OF 360 MULTI-FAMILY DWELLINGS) TO MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (2-5 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE WITH A MAXIMUM OF 150 SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS), LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF TOWN VIEW AVENUE AND MURRIETA HOT SPRINGS ROAD 14 City of Temecula's Vendor's Ordinance RECOMMENDATION: 14.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 95- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN CONNECTION WITH THE APPROVAL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA VENDOR'S ORDINANCE AND ADOPTING THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION 14.2 Read by title only and introduce an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 95- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA PERTAINING TO OUTDOOR VENDORS AND ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS FOR OUTDOOR VENDING R:V~ende%02,2196 · COUNCIL BUSINESS 15 School District Mitioation Fees (Continued from the meeting of 2/14/95) RECOMMENDATION: 15.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 95- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE SCHOOL FACILITY IMPACT MITIGATION PROGRAM 16 17 18 Contract for User Fee and Develooment Imoact Fee Study RECOMMENDATION: 16.1 Approve the contract with David M. Griffith and Associates (DMG) to conduct a user fee and development impact fee analysis. 16.2 Appropriate $39,340 from General Fund fund balance to account number 001-140- 999-5248 (Consulting) to fund this contract. Adhoc Committee for Communitv Services Funding RECOMMENDATION: 17.1 Appoint two members of the Council to serve on an Adhoc Committee to review Community Services Funding Applications. Reouest for Funds for Temecula Valley Film Festival RECOMMENDATION: 18.1 Consider a funding request for the Temecula Valley Film Council. 19 Discussion of California State Lottery and the Distribution to the City of Temecula (Placed on the agenda at the request of Mayor Stone) R:~ead,%022816 7 DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS CITY MANAGER'S REPORT CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: March 14, 1995, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. R:~a~gende~02219~ · TEMFCULA COMMUNITY SFRVI~;8 DISTRICT NFFTINn - {To be held at 8:00) CALL TO ORDER: President Ronald H. Roberts ROLL CALL: DIRECTORS: Lindemans, Mufioz, Parks, Stone, Roberrs PUBLIC COMMENT: Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors, should present a completed pink "Request to Speak" to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address for the record. CONSENT CALENDAR I Swim Team Aoreement RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the Agreement between the City of Temecula Community Services Department and the Temecula Tritons Swim Team, for use of the Community Recreation Center Swimming Pool. 2 Review and Aooroval of the 1994-95 Mid-Year Budoet RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: 3 RESOLUTION NO. 95- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGETS Parkview Site Proiect - Phase II RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Approve Amendment No. I of $66,300to the design contract with RJM Design Group, Inc. to include the design, construction documents, and construction administration for Phase II of the Parkview Site Project, described as the upper pond and channel improvements adjacent to the Sports Park Desiltation Lake. R:',l~gende~022116 · DISTRICT BUSINESS 4 Santa Gertrudis Creek Trail - Final Aoreement with Riverside County Flood Control RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Approve the Agreement between the City of Temecul8 and Riverside County Flood Control to utilize the Santa Gertrudis Channel Improvements for Recreation Trail purposes. 4.2 Appropriate $25,000 in Public Facilities - Development Impact Fees for the necessary trail improvements. GENERAL MANAGERS REPORT - Bradley DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT - Nelson BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS ADJOURNMENT: Next meeting: March 14, 1995, 8:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. R:~4e~e~02211i 10 CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Ronald J. Parks presiding ROLL CALL: AGENCY MEMBERS: Lindemans, Mufioz, Roberrs, Stone, Parks PUBLIC COMMENT: Anyone wishing to address the Agency, should present a completed pink "Request to Speak" to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address for the record. CONSENT CALENDAR I Consideration of RDA Commercial Rehabilitation Small Business Loan RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Consider approval of an RDA Commercial Rehabilitation Loan to The Blind Pig Brewing Co., Inc., located at 42387 Avenida Alvaredo, Suite 108, Temecula, CA 92590. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT AGENCY MEMBER'S REPORTS ADJOURNMENT: Next Meeting: March 14, 1995, 8:00 PM, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. R:%Aeende~D22196 11 ITEM 1 ITEM 2 MINUTES OF A SPECIAL MEETING HELD JOINTLY WITH THE CITY OF TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING COMMISSION JANUARY 30, 1995 A special meeting held jointly with the City of Temecule Planning Commission and the Temecule City Council, held on Monday, January 30, 1995, 7:00 P.M., at the Temecula City Hall Main Conference Room, 43174 Business Park Drive, Temeculs, California. Mayor Jeffrey Stone presiding. Councilmember Roberts led the flag salute. PRESENT: 5 ABSENT: 0 PRESENT: 3 ABSENT: 2 COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: Lindemans, Mu~oz, Parks, Roberts, Stone None Slaven, Webster, Ford Blair, Fahey Also present were City Manager Ronald Bradley, City Clerk June S. Greek, Planning and Director Gary Thornhill. PUBLIC COMMENT Arthur Pelka, 43185 Mergerits Road, Temecula, representing the homeowners in the Chaparral and Paloma Del Sol area, expressed opposition to the commercially zoned property at the corner of Pauba and Margarita Roads. Mr. Pelka said the homeowners understood from the Planning Commission meeting in December, 1994, that they cannot have the proposed development stopped. He said that the homeowners would like the opportunity to discuss what types of business will be allowed in the commercial center. COUNCIL REPORTS None COUNCIL BUSINESS 1. Authorization to Award Informal Bids for Interim Fire Station Community Services Director Shawn Nelson presented the staff report. It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans to approve staff recommendation as follows: 1.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: JOINT CITY COUNCILIPLANNINR COMMISSION MI::I:'rlNG JANUARY 30, 1995 RESOLUTION N0.95-09 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO AWARD CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS FOR AN INTERIM FIRE STATION IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $75,000 IN ACCORDANCE WITH MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 3.32.050 The motion was carried as follows: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Lindemans, Muf~oz, Parks, Roberrs, Stone NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None 2. Introduction of the City of Temeculs Draft Development Code Planning Director Gary Thornhill presented the staff report. Senior Planner John Meyer advised on the current status of the Development Code. Mr. Meyer said the Planning Commission will set aside the second meeting of every month beginning February 27, 1995, to review the draft Development Code, and anticipates the review to be completed in 3 or 4 meetings. The Development Code will then be brought to the City Council for review and approval. Commissioner Fahey arrived at 7:20 P.M. Mayor Pro Tern Lindemans asked if the homeowners who Mr. Pelka is representing, will have their concerns addressed about a certain business proposed for the commercial center in their neighborhood. Director Thornhill explained the designation is citywide. He said that whatever is allowed at this neighborhood commercial center, will be allowed at all neighborhood commercial centers throughout the City. He suggested the Commission and the Council target those uses which they ere most concerned with and conditionally approve them. Planning Commissioner Marcia Slaven said when she looks at the Draft Development Code for neighborhood commercial, she determines what would be suitable for the neighborhood environment. Mayor Stone said he would like increased advertisement for the Development Code hearings. JOINT CITY COUNCIL/PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JANUARY 30.1995 Mark Telford, 33415 Little Red Place, Menifee, representing the Winchester Group, 41735 Winchester Road, Temecula, said the building at this address was designed for a showroom type use. He said he receives a lot of calls for carpet and furniture sales facilities however, the City does not allow this use. Mr. Telford said he would like to see an amendment allowing service commercial uses in the business park zone. Planner John Meyer explained that the City has brought community commercial zoning further west along Winchester Road however, the consensus from the community workshops was to focus the community commercial uses along the Jefferson corridor as opposed to the Winchester corridor. Councilmember Mufioz said he feels grandfathering existing uses will satisfy the concerns of existing business and property owners and accomplish what the City is trying to achieve with the development code. It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember Parks to receive and file the report. The motion carried as follows: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Lindemans, Mur~oz, Parks, Roberts, Stone NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None Planning Commissioner Andrew Webster advised Council that the Commission has reviewed their first Village Center and continued the item to March 6, 1995. Commissioner Webster said he would like s joint workshop with the Council to discuss the Village Center concept. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember Roberts to adjourn at 8:15 P.M. The motion was unanimously carried. The next meeting of the Temecula City Council will be held jointly with the RDA on January 31, 1995, 7:00 P.M., at the Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temeculs, California. The next regular meeting of the Temecula City Council will be held on Tuesday, February 14, 1995, 7:00 P.M., at the Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. Mayor Jeffrey Stone ATTEST: City Clerk June S. Greek MINUTES OF A SPECIAL MEETING OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL/ TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY JANUARY 31, 1995 A special meeting of the Temecula City Council/Temecula Redevelopment Agency was called to order on Tuesday, January 31, 1995, 7:05 P.M., at the Temecula Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California, Mayor Jeffrey E. Stone presiding. PRESENT: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Lindemans, Mufioz, Parks, Roberts, Stone ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None Also present were City Manage Ronald Bradley, Assistant City Manager Mary Jane McLarney,. City Attorney Peter Thorsen and City Clerk June S. Greek. INVOCATION The invocation was given by Pastor Dave Belcher, Sunrise Community Church. FLAG SALUTE Agency Chairperson Parks led the flag salute. PUBLIC COMMENTS Bonnie Reed, 42050 Main Street, objected to the findings of the poll taken by the Main Street Association, stating many members of the organization do not reside or own a business in Old Town. PRESENTATIONS/PROC~ AMATIONS Mr. Howard Chesher introduced NIs. Janet Roth who will serve as the Administrative Director of Old Town Mainstreet Program. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Councilmember Mur~oz reported he visited Southern California Edison's facility in Menifee and test drove the new electric vehicle. He suggested the rest of the Council test drive this vehicle and asked that the City liegin to prepare for the introduction of this technology. Mayor Stone reported he met wi~h Assemblyman Ray Hayes regarding Proposition 111 funds, and reported that funds may be wailable in conjunction with the Winchester Bridge project. TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL%RDA MEETING MINUTES 1131195 COUNCIL BUSINESS 1. Pale Road Bridae City Manager Bradley presented the staff report noting Council has been provided with an amended version of the Memorandum of Agreement. He explained this agreement was made possible through the cooperation and initiation of the Pechanga Band, and reported that it provides sufficient funds to complete construction of the Pale Road bridge. Mayor Stone asked for an explanation of the changes. Public Works Director Joe Kicak outlined the changes as follows: Item A-5 of the original agreement was modified adding a statement regarding availability of funds. Second item modified, B-5 which adds the provision: The City will provide monthly progress reports with invoice, progress payment to the Bureau during construction of bridge. It was moved by Councilmember Roberts, seconded by Councilmember Parks to approve staff recommendation as follows: 1.1 Authorize the Mayor to sign the Memorandum of Agreement between the Bureau of Indian Affairs and the City of Temecula. The motion was unanimously carried. JOINT COUNCIl/RDA BUSINESS Amended and Restated Memorandum of understandina Between the City of Temecule Redevelooment Aaencv of the City of Temecula. and T.?.B.G.. Inc. Mayor Stone announced a conflict of interest on this item, based on his ownership of property in Old Town, and turned the meeting over to Chairperson Parks. City Manager Ron Bradley presented the staff report outlining the changes in the MOU. Lots were drawn to determine the order of speakers. T.O.T.A.L. drew the first 10 minutes, with "Yes on Measure B" to follow. Private citizens wishing to speak were drawn at random and given two minutes each. Therese McLeod, representing T.O.T.A.L., voiced her objection to the revised MOU and stated T.O.T.A.L's objection to the Old Town Entertainment Center is the project size, scope and appropriateness for Old Town. She also objected to a change made in the Old Town Specific Plan, on Section 2, Page 13. TEMFCULA CITY COUNCIL~RDA MEFTING MINUTES RECESS Chairperson Parks called a recess at 8:04 PM to change the tape. reconvened at 8:05 PM. 113 1195 The meeting was Joan Sparkman, representing "Yes on B", voiced her support of the revised MOU and the Old Town Entertainment Center, citing potential employment opportunities and the revitalization of Old Town as points in favor. Doug Davies, representing "Yes on B", voiced his support for the project listing restoration of the economical viability of Old Town and the strengthening of the financial base for the City. He also listed the need for funding of street and= infrastructure improvements. Ginger Greeves, representing "Yes on B", spoke in support of exposure for the arts and the wholesome entertainment this project will bring. Zav Buffman, representing "Yes on B" , showed slides of other projects he has worked on and stated he will bring quality entertainment and quality restoration and construction of buildings that will enhance Old Town. Joseph Terrezas, 31160 Lahontan St., spoke in opposition to the Old Town Entertainment Project. , Lauretta Olson, 41945 Koffenboom Ct., spoke in favor of the Old Town Entertainment Center. Dennis Frank, 27475 Ynez Road, #338, spoke in favor of Old Town Entertainment Project. Bill Harker, 31130-85 South General Kearny Road, spoke in favor of the Old Town Entertainment Center Project. Marvin Zeldin, 38027 Via Del Luigi, spoke in favor of the Old Town Entertainment Center Project. Dallas Gray, P.O. Box 457, representing the Old Town Redevelopment Advisory Committee, informed the Council that the Committee had not had the opportunity to review this document. Bonnie Reed, 42050 Main Street, representing the Old Town Redevelopment Advisory Committee, asked that the committee be informed in advance of action affecting Old Town. Art Beese, 41778 Bargil Court, spoke in opposition of the project. TFMECULA CITY COUNCIL~RDA MEFTING MINUTI:S 1131195 Dennis Schare, 28730 Via Calusa, Murrieta, spoke in favor of the project, stating it would provide an economic base, but suggested the City look at a "no growth" policy on completion of the project. Kenneth Dodd, 30097 Via Velez Place, spoke in favor of the Old Town Entertainment Center Project. Ann Buford, spoke in opposition to the project. RECESS Chairperson Parks called a recess at 8:54 PM. The meeting was reconvened at 9:07 PM. George Buhler, 40265 Paseo Sereno, spoke in opposition to the Old Town Entertainment Center Project. Jim Meyler, President of Arts Council, 29930 Santiago Road, spoke in favor of the amended Memorandum of Understanding. Phillip Columbo, 2900 Front Street, gave his time to Zev Buffman. Zev Buffman, responded to allocations made by Joseph Tarrazes regarding the sale of his chain of theaters, stating he had been in the entertainment theater business for 26 years and simply decided to turn his energy in another direction, outdoor amphitheaters and sporting events. Sam Pratt, 40470 Brixton Cove, spoke in opposition to project. Sandra Garcia, representing Employment Development Department, 40880-B Country Center Drive, offered the Departments services to interview future employees. Bob Kirpatrick, 27720 Jefferson, spoke in favor of project and the amended MOU. Stewart and Pat Morris, 29734 Calla Pantano, spoke in favor of Old Town Entertainment Center Project. AI Spencer, 30542 Bag Hill Drive, voiced concern regarding the financing of the Project. Robert Felix, 39280 Calla Bellagio, representing Youth for Economic Development, spoke in favor of the Old Town Entertainment Center Project. Alice Sullivan, representing the Temecule Valley Chamber of Commerce, spoke in favor of the Old Town Entertainment Center Project. Jeffrey Horton, 24892 Ravensview Court, spoke in support of project. TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL%RDA MEETING MINUT;S 113 1195 Neil Cleveland, 28465 Front Street, spoke in support of the amended MOU and the Project. Phila McDaniel, 42050 Main Street, No. B, spoke in opposition to the project and asked that a moratorium be placed on rent increases in Old Town. Frank Dagonese, spoke in favor of the amended MOU and the Old Town Entertainment Center Project. Councilmember Mufioz asked for clarification of the following items: wages, air quality and other mitigation efforts, rent controls, number of jobs created during and after completion of tie project, conduit financing, C.O.P.S. (Certificates of Participation), how debt is retired, collateral, retail inside the hotel and how it relates to existing merchants, parking and whether phasing should be used. Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans asked for an explanation of the cost differential on the Western Bypass, from 1.5 Million, to 11 million and on the Assessment District and who would be assessed. He also asked how long the MOU would remain in effect and whether the City is considering buying any of these bonds. RECESS Chairperson Parks called a recess at 9:52 PM. The meeting was reconvened at 10:02 PM. City Manager Bradley responded that the City does not plan to buy any bonds and the MOU extends through August 1, 1995 with one six-month extension. City Manager Bradley explained that proposed retail located near the hotel and arena, are designed to serve tourist needs and not to complete with existing merchants. With regard to the possibility of phasing, Mr. Bradley explained Price Waterhouse indicated the key to the success of the project is the scope and synergy and indicated phasing is not considered · viable option. Mr. Bradley explained that no existing Old Town land owners or residents will participate in assessment for the Western Bypass. Only those landowners who get direct benefit will be assessed. City Attorney Thorson steed he does not have a definitive answer on the possibiliy of commercial rent control, ~ would do further research if it is the will of the Council. Council consensus was reached to bring this point back before the Council at a future date. TFMFCULA CITY COUNCIL%RDA MEETING MINUTES 1131195 City Manager Bradley introduced Associate Planner Dave Hogan to address air quality and parking. Mr. Hogan explained that based on Air Quality Management Districts standards, traffic associated with the project is expected to exceed the air Quality standards. He stated that the development anticipated in this area will have regional impacts which are not considered significant. He stated Council will have the opportunity to adopt 8 statement of overriding considerations to the EIR. Councilmember Muf~oz asked Mr. Buffman to share some ideas for mitigation of traffic and air impacts. Mr. Buffman presented his ideas regarding use of non-polluting vehicles and a possible light rail system. He reported that 811 vehicles used to bring people in and out of the project will be non-polluting. RECESS Chairperson Parks called a brief recess at 10:17 PM to change tape. The meeting was reconvened at 10:18 PM. Planning Director Gary Thornhill responded to the question regarding added language in the Old Town Specific Plan. He reported that this language was added at the noticed public hearing of February 8, 1994, which provided for modification of the plan should an entertainment complex become a reality in the future. Public Works Director Joe Kicak responded that the Overland Bridge Crossing price differential was because ~ 1.5 million is listed in the Capital Improvement Plan as a line item for design, noting one source of funding. He stated that $11.5 is the estimated cost of the completed overcrossing. Assistant City Manager Mary Jane McLarney explained conduit financing and discussed Certificates of Participation (COPS), explaining that in essence this is a sponsorship, not a financial responsibility. She also indicated the number of direct jobs from this project is estimated at 1,062. She explained using the multiplier effect, the total jobs produced is estimated at 2500. She explained that the title of property is held by the property owner, the bond holders have financial interests in property and once bonds are issued, the City would have no financial interest. She stated if revenues don't support the issue, staff won't recommend it. Debt retirement is planned to come from revenues of project. Mr. Buffman answered the question regarding wages, stating the average annual salary would be e 19,600/year with jobs falling into the categories of talent, general and administrative, operations, security, sanitation and parking, food and beverage. He explained that the food and beverage category would be the lowest category averaging $13,500\year or $6.50 hr., however 80% of jobs will pay either double the minimum TEMFCULA CITY COUNCIL%RDA MEETING MINUTES 1131195 wage or higher. Associate Planner David Hogan answered the question regarding parking, stating that three parkinglots are planned. Planned locations are as follows: south end of Front Street, 1000 to 1200 vehicles; behind the proposed hotel an area for 2,000 vehicles; and a smaller lot to service the north end of Old Town, using the City-owned parcel on 6th Street. Mr. Hogan explained that a traffic analysis was done for peak hour traffic, adding maximum traffic from the project. He explained that the traffic does not deteriorate except at South 79 and Interstate 15. He explained there is not a significant impact from additional vehicle trips. It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember Roberts to approve staff recommendation as follows: 2.1 Approve the execution of the Memorandum of Understanding. The motion was unanimously carried with Mayor Stone abstaining. CITY MANAGER/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT None given. CITY ATTORNEY/GENERAL COUNSEL'S REPORT None given. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Councilmember Roberts, seconded by Councilmember Parks to adjourn at 10:58 P.M. The motion was unanimously carried. The next regular meeting of the Temecula City Council will be held on Tuesday, February 14, 1995, 7:00 P.M., Temecula Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. ATTEST: Jeffrey E. Stone Mayor June S. Greek, CMC City Clerk (:~,~D~AAINUTE~!/21.~6 7 12j'Je~ ITEM 3 RESOLIH'ION NO. 95-- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EYi:HR1T A THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMF_I3ULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERIvlINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A have been audited by the City Manager, and that the same are hereby allowed in the amount of $1,152,076.41. Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 28th day of February, 1995. ATTEST: Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk, CMC [SEAL] P.~osSl STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS crry OF TEMF~ULA) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do certify that the foregoing Re,~lution No. 95- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 28th day of February, 1995 by the following x'x~ll call vote: AYES: 0 COUNCH,MEMBERS: None NOES: 0 COUNCILMBiBERS: None COUNCK/~MBER~: None June S. Greek, City Clerk, CMC CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS 02/09/95 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 02/18/95 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 02/17/95 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 02/28/95 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 02109/95 TOTAL PAYROLL: TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 02/28/95 COUNCIL MEETING: DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND: CHECKS: 001 GENERAL 100 GAS TAX 120 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FUND 140 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT 165 RDA-LOW/MOD 190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 21 0 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ (CIP) 220 MARGARITA ROAD REIMB. DIST. 250 CAPITAL PROJECTS - TCSD 280 RDA4:~IP 300 INSURANCE 310 VEHICLES 320 INFORMATIONS SYSTEMS 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 340 FACILITIES 380 RDA-DEBT SERVICE 390 TCSD DEBT SERVICE PAYROLL: 001 GENERAL 100 GAS TAX 165 RDA-LOW/MOD 190 TCSD 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 280 RDA4:~IP 300 INSURANCE 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 340 FACILITIES TOTAL BY FUND: RONALD E. BRADLEY, CITY MANAGER $ 114,758.94 190,206.82 429,634.74 292,451.71 125,024.20 $ 1,152,076.41 744,035.10 18,073.07 0.00 0.03 497.28 53,718.41 9,060.65 23,936.56 20,648.29 0.00 42,368.53 0.03 0.00 90,033.12 6,100.01 0.00 11,625.34 3,928.80 2,029.07 0.00 0.00 $ 1,027,052.21 81,007.29 16,542.46 657.52 17,826.22 464.00 620.26 1,803.96 745.37 1,961.11 1,306.23 0.03 2,083.78 125,024.20 $ 1,152,076.41 , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT VOUCHRE2 02/09/95 12:37 CITY OF TENECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 100 GAS TAX FUND 165 RDA DEV- LOg/NOD SET ASIDE 190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CZP ]00 INSURANCE FUND 320 INFORIMT]OR SYSTENS 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 3~0 FACILITIES TOTAL ANOUNT 63,736.68 12,207.07 457.16 17,720.9~. 5/~..38 520 2,4.83.91 /,89.00 8,583.69 2,054.20 3,353.14 1,615.09 114,758.9A vO 02/, J VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 21960 4~8221 ,~1 4/,8221 448221 448221 6J,8221 448221 z~8221 4~,8221 ~48221 ~8221 ~8221 ~8221 454154 454154 454154 4F/'--~ 454154 454154 454154 454154 454154 454154 454154 454154 454154 454154 454154 454154 454154 454154 454154 454154 22067 22068 22068 22068 22068 22068 22068 12:37 CHECK DATE 01/30/~5 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02109195 02/09/95 02/09/95 VENDOR NUMIIER 000128 000444 000~4 ooe~ 000/.-44 ooe444 ooe444 ooc~ ooo~ 000~ 000~ 000~ 000283 000283 000283 00028S 000283 00028~ 00028S 000283 00028~ 000283 00028~ 000283 000283 000283 00028~ 000283 000283 00028~ 00028~ 000283 000283 000724 000116 000116 000116 000116 000116 000116 000116 000116 000116 VENDOR NAHE CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, FIRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (El)D) FIRSTAX (El)D) FIRSTAX (El)D) FIRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX ([RS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (/AS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (]RS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) F]RSTAX (]RS) FIRSTAX (]RS) A & R CUSTOM SCREEN PAl A V P VISION PLANS A V P VISION PLANS A V P VISION PLANS A V P VISION PLANS A V P VISION PLANS A V P VISION PLANS A V P VISION PLANS A V P VISION PLANS A V P VISION PLANS CITY OF TENECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION BOND FOR BREATHING TRUCK 000~4 SO l 000,~ SOl 000~ SOl 00044~ STATE O004z~e STATE O00Z~,~ STATE O004Z~ STATE 00044~ STATE 0004~ STATE 000444 STATE 000/~ STATE 000444 STATE 000444 STATE O004Z~ STATE 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 NED[CARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 NEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 NED/CANE 000283 FEDICARE 000283 NEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 NEDICARE 000283 MEDICARE 000283 NED[CARE SPRTS PROGRAMS AWARDS 000116 AVP 000116 AVP 000116 AVP 000116 AVP 000116 AVP 000116 AVP 000116 AVP 000116 AVP 000116 AVP ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-171-999-5201 001-2070 100-2070 190-2070 001-2070 100-2070 165-2070 '190-2070 191-2070 192-2070 193-2070 280-2070 300-2070 ]20-2070 340-2070 001-2070 100-2070 165-2070 190-2070 191-2070 192-2070 193-2070 280-2070 300-2070 320-2070 340-2070 001-2070 100-2070 165-2070 190-2070 191-2070 192-2070 193-2070 280-2070 300-2070 320-2070 340-2070 190-183-999-5380 001-2310 100-2310 165-2310 190-2310 191 -r410 193-2310 280-2310 300-2310 340-2310 ITEM AMOUNT 2,08.00 37.81 16.9~ 28.12 3,329.30 674.89 20.42 516.12 16.76 8.91 45 9.67 194.30 62.73 13.64 12,115.71 2,607.09 85.~ 2,2~.55 49.60 213.80 5~.~ 1~.~ 2,961.~ 598.40 17.70 22.~ ~.10 18.29 82.~ 57.~ 905.82 395 91.18 6.68 52.90 4.39 5.36 3.34 2.~ 16,70 PAGE 1 CHECK ANOUNT 2,083.00 4,97~.47 22,992.68 905.82 VOUCHRE2 02/09/95 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 22068 22068 22068 22068 22069 22070 22071 22072 2207'~ 22074 22075 22076 22077 22078 22078 22078 22078 22078 22078 22078 22078 22078 22078 22078 22078 22078 22078 22078 22078 22078 22078 22078 22078 22078 22078 22078 22078 22078 22078 22078 12:37 CHECK DATE 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02109195 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 VENDOR NLllER 000116 000116 000116 000116 001674 000400 000100 000427 000122 001718 000679 000679 000679 000679 000679 000679 000679 000679 000679 000679 000679 000679 000679 000679 000679 000679 000679 000679 000679 000679 000679 000679 000679 VENDOR NAME A V P VISION PLANS A V P VISION PLANS A V P VISION PLANS A V P VISION PLANS ADKINS, RONERT STEVEN ALEXANDER HAMILTON ]NST ALLIED BARRICADE CONPAR AMERICAN CULTURE ANTONIO, PENNY ANTUZZI, HATT ARTESIA IMPLEMENT, INC. B s N SPORTS BEJING LONGEyITY, INC. BOGBAPHICS PRINTING PLU BOGRAPHICS PRINTING PLU BOGBAPHICS PRINTING PLU BOGBAPHICS PRINTING PLU BOGRAPNICS PRINTING PLU BOGRAPHICS PRINTING PLU BOGRAPHICS PRINTING PLU BOGRAPHICS PRINTING PLU BOGRAPHICS PRINTING PLU BOGRAPHICS PRINTING PLU BOGRAPHICS PRINTING PLU BOGRAPHICS PRINTING PLU BOGRAPH[CS PRINTING PLU BOGRAPH[CS PRINTING PLU BOGRAPHICS PRINTING PLU BOGRAPHICS PRINTING PLU BOGRAPHICS PRINTING PLU BOGRAPHICS PRINTING PLU BOGRAPHICS PRINTING PLU BOGRAPHICS PRINTING PLU BOGRAPHICS PRINTING PLU BOGRAPHICS PRINTING PLU BOGRAPHICS PRINTING PLU BOGRAPHICS PRINTING PLU BOGRAPHICS PRINTING PLU BOGRAPHICS PRINTING PLU BOGRAPHICS PRINTING PLU CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION 000116 AVP COER 000116 AVP DED 000116 AVP 000116 AVP REVE PAYMENT TO TCSD INSTRUCTOR NANAGER'S LEGAL BULLETIN NISC SUPPLIES FOR RD I~ORK REFUND-ROOM RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND FOR TCSO CLASS REFUND FOR TCSO CLASS REPAIRS FOR TCND TRACTOR TENNIS TOURNARENT TABLE PAYMENT TO TC~D INSTRUCTON BUSINESS LICENSE APPLICATIONS BUSINESS CARDS/M. SLAVEN BUSINESS CARDS/A. k/EBSTER BUSINESS CARDS/H. MILLER BUSINESS CARDS/K. LINDEHANS TAX TAX TAX TAX BUSINESS CARDS: L.A.AHAVISCA BUSINESS CARDS: J.CROeJE-PELLET TAX POLICE DEPT LETTERHEAD POLICE DEPT ENVELOPES COLOR WASH UP TAX GOLD FOIL LETTERHEAD BUSINESS CARDS-R. RONERTS BUSINESS CARDS-JEFFREY STONE TAX BUSINESS CARDS/POLICE DEPT TYPESETT I NG TAX BUSINESS CARDS NOT REC'D/RR BUSINESS CARDS NOT REC'D/JS TAX BUSINESS CARD NOT REC'D ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-1180 001-Z$10 001-2~10 001-2~10 190-183-999-5330 001-150-999-5228 100-164-601-5218 190-2900 190-183-4982 190-183-4982 190-180-999-5214 190-180-999-5301 190-183-999-5330 001-140-999-5220 001-161-999-5222 001-161-999-5222 190-180-999-5222 001-100-999-5220 190-180-999-5222 001-161-999-5222 001-100-999-5220 001-140-999-5220 190-180-999-5220 190-180-999-5220 190-180-999-5220 001-170-999-5222 001-170-999-5222 001-170-999-5222 001-170-999-5222 001-100-999-5220 001-100-999-5220 001-100-999-5220 001-100-999-5220 001-170-999-5220 001-170-999-5220 001-170-999-5220 001-100-999-5220 001-100-999-5220 001-100-999-5220 001-100-999-5220 ITEM AMOUNT 9.75 1.52 1.52 1.52- 69.60 48.00 32.14 100.00 15.00 20.00 72.30 37.68 80.00 183.71 31.88 31.88 31.88 91.02 2.47 4.94 7.05 14.24 31.88 31.88 4.94 40.69 37.75 15.00 7.24 27, 02 91.02 91,02 16,20 31.88 12.00 2.47 91.02- 91.02- 14.11- 96.07- CHECK AROUNT 590.20 69.60 48.00 32.14 100.00 15.00 20.00 7Z.30 37.68 vd VOUCHER/ CHECK HUNBER 2207~ 22079 22080 22081 22082 2208S 2208~ 22085 22086 22086 22087 22089 22090 22090 22090 22090 22090 22090 22090 22090 22091 22092 22093 22093 220~3 220~3 22093 22094 22095 12:37 CHECK DATE 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/0~/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 VENDOR NUNBER 000839 000839 000128 001054 001528 001717 000131 000131 001195 001670 001670 001670 000980 000140 000140 000140 000140 000140 000140 000140 000140 001275 000155 000156 000156 000156 000156 000156 001056 001701 001701 VENDOR NN4E CELSOC CELSOC CSULBF~ATZON CVJPIA CAL'SURANCE ASSOCIATES, CALIFORNIA BUILDING OFF CALIFORNIA DEPT OF JUST CALIFORNIA TRADE & COI4H CARL gARREN & CO., INC. CARL MARREN & CO., INC. CENTRAL SECURITY SERVIC CHAMBERS, CHANBERS, BOB CHAHBERS, BOO COAST IRRIGATION SUPPLY COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEH COLONIAL LKFE & ACCXDEN COLONIAL LIFE & ACCXDEN COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN COLONIAL LIFE & ACC]DEN COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN COHPUSERVE, INC. DAVLIN DENTICARE OF CALIFORNIA DENT[CARE OF CALIFORNIA DENTICARE OF CALIFORNIA DENTZOARE OF CALIFORNIA DENT/CARE OF OAL]FORNIA EDNOFFo VANICE EXCEL LANDSCAPE EXCEL RENTAL CENTER EXCEL RENTAL CENTER CITY OF TENECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERICOS ITEN DESCRIPTION NAP ACT SEHINAR 2/ZS/95 NAP ACT SEMINAR 3117/95 GRANT gRITING klORKSHOP-PCNELL RKSHP: ACCIDENT INVEST 2/16 DL INSURANCE FOR SlO CHEW PU DUES FOR A. ELNO FY 4195-5196 FINGERPRINT PROCESSING FEE TRENDS 2000 SHOM 2/13-14/95 OLD VAIL PARTNERS' 11/12/93 CALLAHAN DANIELLE 08/24/94 SECURITY HONITORING t C.R.C. RADAR HOLSTER FOR POLICE MTRCY FREIGHT TAX PUIIP FOR CITY YARD 000140 600 A&S 000140 600 A&S 000140 CANCER 000140 CANCER 000140 CANCER 000140 CANCER 000140 CANCER 000140 CANCER FEB 95 ACCESS CHARGES TAPING OF 1/31 COUNCIL HEETING 000156 DEN-NqIN 000156 DENT-ADV 000156 DENTICAR 000156 DENT-REV 000156 DENTIOAR REFUND FOR TCSD CLASS REHOVEL OF gEED i $N)DLEMOCO PUNP & HOSE RENTAL PUMP & HOSE RENTAL ACCOUNT NUNHER 100-164-603-5258 001-163-999-5261 001-165-999-5260 001-150-999-5261 001-171-999-5201 001-162-999-5226 001-150-999-5250 280-199-999-5264 )00-199-9~9-5205 300-19~-999-5205 190-182-999-5250 001-170-9~-5242 001-170-9~-5242 001-170-;-5242 190-180-~-5212 001-7_330 190-2330 001-2330 100-2330 190-2330 191-Z330 193-2330 280-2330 320-199-999-5228 001-100-999-5250 001-23~.0 001-1180 001-2340 001-1180 001-Z.~0 190-183-4980 193-180-999-5415 100-164-601-5238 100-164-601-5238 ITER ANOUNT 385.00 385. O0 150.00 50.00 239. O0 150.00 192.00 780.00 356,00 476.50 53.00 138.00 8.50 11.38 35,(X) 39.75 152.47 12.94 14.35 17.53 5.18 10,00 789.06 15.00 7.84 7.8~ 7.84 10,00 345. O0 120.11 180,16 PAGE 3 CHECK 770. O0 150,00 50.00 239.00 · . 150.00 192o00 832.50 53.00 157.88 35.09 365.61 10.00 78~.06 30.68 10.00 345.00 300.27 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TENECULA 02/09/~5 12:37 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM liIJMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER ITEM AleXIT CHECK ANOUIIT 22097 02/09/95 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. EXPRESS NAIL SERVICE 22098 02/09/95 001511 FIELDNAN ROLAPP & ASSOC PROF SERVICE RE: LEIFER RD 001-162-999-5230 210-166-627-5802 15.25 435.00 : 15.25 435.00 22099 02/09/95 000803 FLAGHOUSE, INC. IGi!K KOLD (CASE/16) 22099 02/09/95 000803 FLAGHOUSE, [NC. FREIGHT 22099 02/09/95 000803 FLAGHOUSE, [NC. TAX 190-180-999-5301 190-180-999-5301 190-180-999-5301 63.75 7.01 4.96 22100 02/09/95 000643 22100 02/09/95 001)643 22101 02/09/95 000184 22102 02/09/95 001355 22103 02/09/95 000~81 FORTNER HANDMARE, ]NC. FORTNER HARDMARE, INC. G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYIq G T E CALIFORNIA, INC. GEOTECHNICAL & ENVIRORM TCSD NAINT SUPPLIES MISC. SUPPLIES FOR PM 909&99-6267GEM FEB 95 ACCESS CHARGES PROF. SERVICES FOR DEC 94 190-180-999-5212 100-16~-601-5218 320-199-999-5208 320-199-9~-5208 210-190-136-580~ 78.40 57.90 32.40 350.00 54.00 136.30 32.~0 350.00 54.00 22106 02/09/95 000177 2210~ 02/09/95 000177 2210~ 02/09/95 000177 22106 02/09/95 000177 2210~ 02/09/95 000177 22104 02/09/95 000177 22104 02/09/95 000177 22104 02/09/95 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT GLENRIES OFFICE PRODUCT GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT GLENRIES OFFICE PRODUCT GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES/BLDG & SAFETY OFFICE SUPPLIES/BLDG & SAFETY OFFICE SUPPLIES/TC$O M[SC-OFFICE SUPPLIES/FINANCE OFFICE SUPPLIES-CITY MGR DEPT OFFICE SUPPLIES-CITY MGR DEPT NISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES-CITY MGR DEPT 001-162-~-5220 001-162-9~-5220 190-180-999-5220 001-140-999-5220 001-110-999-5220 001-110-999-5220 340-199-99~-5262 001-110-9q~-5220 98.91 201.83 32.68 9.70 20.56 159.63 39.60 22105 02/09/95 000192 22105 02/09/95 000192 22105 02109195 000192 22105 02/09/95 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPL[E GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE GLOBAL COlqPUTER SUPPLIE GLOBAL CONPUTER SUPPLIE LASER TENT CARDS 3.5 D]SK LABELS FREIGHT TAX 320-199-9~-5221 320-199-9~-5221 320-19~-999-5221 320-19~-~-5221 19.99 30,99 6.98 4.28 62.24 22106 02/09/95 000178 22106 02/09/95 000178 22106 02/09/95 000178 22106 02/09/95 000178 GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO 10 KEYBOARDS FRE I GHT TAX NISC COMPUTER SUPPLIES 320-19~-9(R-5221. 320-1q~-~4~-5221 320-1~-999-5221 320-1~-~-5221 200.00 10.00 15.50 310.26 22107 02/09/95 000430 22107 02/09/95 000430 22107 02/09/95 000430 22107 02/09/95 000430 22107 02/0~/95 000/,30 22107 02/C)~/95 000~30 22107 02/09/95 000/,30 22107 02/09/95 000430 22107 02/09/95 000/,30 22107 02/0~/95 000~30 22107 02/09/95 000430 22107 02/09/95 000430 GROUP AMERICA - VOLUNTA GROUP ANER l CA - VOLUNTA GROUP AMERICA - VOLUNTA GROUP ANER I CA - VOLUMTA GROUP AMERICA - VOLUNTA GROUP AMERICA - VOLUMTA GROUP ANER/CA - VOLUMTA GROUP AMER/CA - VOLUMTA GROUP NqER]CA - VOLUNTA GROUP AMERICA - VOLUMTA GROUP AMERICA - VOLUNTA GROUP AMERICA - VOLUMTA 000430 VL ADVAN 000430 VOL LIFE 000430 VOL LIFE 000430 VOL LIFE 000430 VOL LIFE 000430 VOL LIFE 000430 VL REVER 000430 VOL LIFE 000430 VOL LIFE 000430 VOL LIFE 000430 VOL LIFE 000430 VOL LIFE 001-2510 001-2510 100-2510 190-2510 192-2510 3/,0-2510 001-2510 001-2510 100-2510 190-2510 192-2510 340-2510 190-18]-4982 190.80 138.91 15.1'9 29.69 6.00 190.80- 138.97 15.73 29.68 6.00 .4Z 15.00 22108 02/09/95 HAERR, DEMISE REFUND FOR TCSD CLASS vd '1 02t, _/5 12:37 CITY OF TE14ECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERICl)S PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 22109 22110 22111 22111 22111 22111 22111 22111 22111 22112 22113 22113 22113 22113 22113 22113 22113 22113 22113 22113 22113 22113 22113 22113 22113 22113 22113 22113 22113 22113 22113 22113 22113 22113 22113 22113 22113 22113 22113 22113 CHECK DATE 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02109/95 02/09/95 02109195 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 VENDOR NUIiER 001697 000186 000186 000186 000186 000186 000186 000186 001536 001536 001536 001536 001536 001536 001536 001536 0015:56 001536 001536 001536 001536 001536 001536 001536 001536 001536 001536 0015:56 0015:56 001536 001536 001536 001536 001536 001536 0015~6 001536 001536 001536 001536 0015:56 000796 000194 VENDOR NAME HAICK, ROBERT HALL, NANCY LEE HANKS HARDWARE, INC. HANKS HARDMARE, INC. HANKS HARDMARE, INC. HANKS HARDMARE, INC. HANKS HARDMARE, INC. HANKS HARDMARE, INC. HANKS HARDMARE, INC. HART, BETH HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE HARTFORD LiFE INSURANCE HARTFORD LiFE iNSURANCE HARTFORD LiFE INSURANCE HARTFORD LiFE iNSURANCE HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE HARTFORD LiFE iNSURANCE HARTFORD LiFE iNSURANCE HARTFORD LIFE INSIJRANCE HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE HARTFORD LiFE INSURANCE HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE HARTFORD LIFE ZNSURANCE HARTFORD LIFE ZNSURANCE HARTFORD LZFE INSURANCE HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE HARTFORD LiFE iNSURANCE HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE HARTFORD LiFE INSURANCE HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE HARTFORD L]FE iNSURANCE HARTFORD LiFE iNSURANCE HARTFORD L]FE iNSURANCE HARTFORD LiFE ]N~IJRANCE HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE HARTFORD LIFE IN$1JRANCE HARTFORD LiFE INSURANCE HARTFORD LiFE INSURANCE HARTFORD LIFE INgJRANCE HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE ]CBO I c 14 A RETZREHENT TRUS [TEN DESCRZPTIOR REFUND FOR TC$1) CLASS PAYMENT TO TCSD INSTRUCTOR NISC NAINT EQUIP SUPPLIES FIRE TCSD NAINT SUPPLIES NZSC MAZNT. SUPPLIES TCSD NAiNT. SUPPLIES MAINT. SUPPLIES-CITY HALL TCSD NAINT SUPPLIES NISC BUILDING NAINT SUPPLIES REFUND FOR TCSD CLASS 001536 LIFE INS 001536 LIFE INS 001536 LIFE INS 001536 LIFE INS 001536 LIFE INS 0015:56 LIFE INS 0015~6 LIFE INS 001536 LIFE INS 0015~6 LIFE INS 001536 LIFE INS 001536 LIFE INS 001536 LTD 001536 LTD 001536 LTD 001536 LTD 001536 LTD 0015:56 LTD 001536 LTD 001536 LTD 001536 LTO 001536 LTD 001536 LTO 001536 STO 001536 STD 001536 STD 001536 STD 0015:56 STD 0015:$6 STD 001536 S113 001536 STD 001536 STD 001536 STD 001536 STD SAN DIEGO CHAPTER FOR A. ELIO 000194 DEF CO~P ACCOIJNT NUMBER 190-183-4982 190-183-999-5330 001-171-999-5242 190-180-999-5212 001-162-999-524Z 190-180-999-5212 3/,0-199-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 :r~0-199-999-5212 190-183-498Z 001 -Z360 100-2~60 165-Z560 190-2360 191-2360 192-Z$60 193-2360 280-2360 300-2360 320-2360 340-2360 001 100-2]80 165-2380 190o2380 191-2380 192-2380 193-2380 280-2380 300-2380 320-2:380 3~0-2380 001-2500 100-2500 165-2500 190 - 25 O0 191-2500 192 - 25 OO 193-2500 280-2500 300-2500 320-2500 3~0-2500 001-162-999-5226 ITE14 35.00 72.00 38.33 19./x 10.18 19.38 182.45 75.89 1.92 15.00 597. O0 116.00 4.00 134.50 4.50 10.00 15.50 2.00 5.00 10.00 21.50 615.03 115.01 132.93 4.53 5.17 16.10 3.17 5.42 13.89 14.87 1,321.97 250.75 12.29 9.87 11.26 35.08 6.91 11.8~ 30.28 32 .~. 25.00 1,470.97 CHECK ANOUNT "35. O0 72.00 347.38 15.00 3,864.33 25.OO VOUCHRE2 02/09/95 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 2.2116 22116 22116 22116 22116 22116 22116 22116 22117 22118 22119 22119 22120 22121 22122 22123 22124 22125 22126 22126 22126 22127 22128 22129 22130 22131 22132 22133 22133 22133 22133 22133 22133 22133 12:37 CHECK DATE 02/09/95 02/0~/~5 02/09/95 02/09/~5 02/09/~5 02/09/95 02109195 0210~195 02/0~/95 02/0~/~5 02/09/95 02/09/~5 02/09/~5 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/93 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/0~/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/0~/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/0~/95 02/0~/95 02/0~/95 02109195 02/0~/~5 VENDOR NIJIER 000196 000196 000196 000196 000196 00019~ 000194 00019/* 001429 001407 000199 000199 001651 000209 001607 001719 001513 001653 001653 001653 001311 001205 000239 O01171 O01243 0002/,6 000266 000266 0002/,6 000266 000246 000246 RETIREHENT TRUS RET]REMENT TRUS RETIREMENT TRUS RET/REMENT TRUS RET/REMENT TRUS RETIREMENT TRUS RETIREMENT TITUS RETIREMENT TRUS INACON INFORI4ATION SYST INTER VALLEY POOL SUPPL INTERNAL REVENUE SERVIC INTERNAL REVENUE SERVIC JIM DUKE SERVICE CONPAN L & N FERTILIZER, INC. L D D S COMMUNICATIONS, L P A, iNC. LEIGHLITER, SUSAN LIBERTY AUTO CENTER NAILER'S SOFTMARE MAILER'S SOFTk~ARE NAILER'S SOFTMARE HANGUSING, STUART MC DERNOTT, BRIDGET MCDERMOTT, TIM K. OLSTEN STAFFING SERVICE ORIENTAL TRADING CO., I PALNQUIST, N/tRY PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION 00019/, DEF rOMP 00019/, DEF COMP 00019/, DEF COW 000194 DEF COMP 000194 DEF COHP 00019~ DEF COI4P 000194 DEF COle 000196 DEF COMP UPGRD FOR i~PERFECT MISC POOL SUPPLIES 000199 IRS GARN 000199 ]RS GARN REPAIRS TO COFFEE BREMER MISC EQUIP REPAIRS FOR TCSD LONG DIST. SERVICE DEVEL. OF CPRS AMARDS ENTRY REFUND FOR TC$O CLASS REPAIR/PAINT CITY MGR VEHICLE ACCUNAIL SOFTgEAR UPDATE FRE l GHT TAX ANNUAL BOOT ALL(NANCE REIME REFUND FOR TCSD CLASS MKSHP: CHTA 2/2-/,/95 TM TEMP HELP M/E 1/8 GRACE HOLIDAYS DECORATIONS,& PRIZES PAYMENT TO TCSD INSTRUCTOR 0002/,6 PER REDE 000266 PERS RET 0002/,6 PERS RET 000246 PERS RET 000246 PERS RET 0002~6 PERS RET 0002/,6 PERS RET ACCOUNT NUMBER 100-2080 190-2080 191-2080 192-2080 193-2080 280-2080 300-2080 340-2080 320-199-999-5221 190-182-99~-5212 001-2160 100-21/.0 190-182-999-5212 190-180-~-5242 320-199-~-5208 1~)-180-~-5250 190-18~-6982 001-110-999-5216 320-199-~-5211 320-199-999-5211 320-199-99~-5211 001-163-99~-52/.3 190-183-6982 001-140-~-5261 001-162-~-5118 1~0-180-999-5301 190-183-999-5:530 001-2130 001-2390 165-2390 190-23~0 191-2390 192-2390 ITEM AMOUNT 239.72 571.55 65.51 75.00 80.06 /.6.15 78.13 22.50 214.14 10~.86 88.71 88.71 61.03 156.33 1,108.09 629.7/, 35. O0 127.13 199.00 8,00 14.43 78.12 35.00 61.68 374.40 189.30 297.60 /,3.06 12,421.20 2,289.22 108,84 2,472.77 89.91 CHECK AMOUNT 2,6~9.59 214.16 106.86 177.62 61.03 15/,.33 1,11v""'~ 62~_4 35.00 127.13 221.43 78.12 35.00 61.68 374.~0 18~.30 297.60 02/, ~ ~ VOUCHER/ CHECK NUNB~R 12:37 CHECK DATE VENDOR NUNBER VENDOR NN, E CiTY OF TENECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION 22133 02/1~/~5 0002~ PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 0002~ PERS RET 22133 02/09/95 0002666 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 0002~ PERS RET 22133 02/0~/95 0002666 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 0002~ PERS MET 22133 02/0~/95 0002666 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 0002~ PERS RET 22133 02/09/95 0002666 PERS (EMPLOYEES' PET]RE 0002~ PERS RET 22133 02/09/95 0002666 PERS (EHPLOYEES' RETIRE 0002~6 SURVIVOR 22133 02/09/95 0002~6 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 22133 02/09/95 00022~ PERS (EHPLOYEES' PETIRE 0002666 SURVIVOR 22133 02/09/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 0002'~ SURVIVOR 22133 02/0~/95 0002~ PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 0002~ SURVIVOR 22133 02/09/95 0002~6 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 0002~6 SURVIVOR 22133 02/09/95 0002~6 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIPE 0002~ SURVIVOR 22133 02/09/95 0002~ PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 0002~ SURVIVOR 22133 02/09/95 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 0002666 SURVIVOR 22133 02/09/95 0002666 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 22133 02/09/~5 0002~ PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 221:~ 02/09/95 0002665 PERS (HEALTH iNSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA SO 22134 02/0~/95 0002665 PERS (HEALTH [NSUR, PRE 0002665 AETNA SO 221:~ 02/0~/95 000245 PERS (HEALTH iNSUR, PRE 000245 BLSHIELD .~"". 02/09/95 0002665 PERS (HEALTH INSUR, PRE 0002665 CIGNA 02/0~/95 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR, PRE 000245 CIGNA 2~ 02/09/95 000245 PERS (HEALTH iNSUR. PRE 000245 CZGNA 2212~ 02/09/95 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 CIGNA 22134 02109195 000245 PERS (HEALTH iNSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET 22134 02/09/95 000245 PERS (HEALTH iNSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET 221366 02/09/95 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET 22134 02/09/95 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET 221:54 02~09~95 0002665 PERS (HEALTH iNSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET 22134 02109195 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET 221:~ 02~09~95 0002665 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET 22134 02109195 000245 PERS (HEALTH iNSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET 22134 02109195 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSLIe. PRE 000245 KAISERSO 22134 02/09/95 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 KAISERSO 22134 02109195 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 KAISERSO 22134 02/09/95 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 KAISERSO 221:54 02/09/95 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PACIFICR 22134 02109195 0002665 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PACIFICR 22134 02~09~95 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PACIFICR 22134 02/09/95 0002665 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PACIFICR 22134 02109195 000245 PERS (HEALTH iNSUR. PRE 000245 PC 22134 02/09/95 000245 PERS (HEALTH/NSUR. PRE 000245 PERS CHO 22134 02109195 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS ClIO 22134 02109195 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS ClIO 22134 02109195 000245 PERS (HEALTH iNSUR. PRE 000245 PERS DED 22134 02109195 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS-ADN 22134 02109195 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 TArE(ARE 22134 02/09/95 0002665 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 TArE(ARE ~ 02109195 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR, PRE 000245 TAKE(ARE 02109195 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 TAKE(ARE ~, 02/09/95 0002665 PERS (HEALTH INSUR, PRE 000245 AETNA SO ACCOUNT NUNBER 193-Z~90 280 - 2390 300-2390 320- 2390 340- 2390 001-2390 100-2390 165-2390 1~)-23~0 191 192-23~0 280-23~0 300-23~0 320-2~0 3~0-23~0 001-2090 100-2090 001-2090 001-2090 100-2090 193-2090 300-2090 001-2090 1 O0 o 2090 165 - 2090 190-2090 191-2090 193-2090 330-2090 340-2090 001-2090 100-2090 190-2090 340-2090 001-2090 100-2090 190-2090 192-2090 001-2090 001-2090 190-2090 280-2090 001-2090 001-2090 001-2090 100-2090 280 - 20~ 300-2090 001-2090 ITEM AN(XJNT 319.65 61.17 149.51 268.21 301.05 57.95 10.78 .37 12.51 .662 1.44 .19 .~6 .93 2.00 824.25 39.81 6266.21 857.37 176.06 306.20 38.27 3,995.95 158.06 1,762.90 143,53 175 318.96 406.55 804.74 513.20 61 1,032.38 394.73 733.20 160.79 512.76 1,606.93 11.05 4.97 822.98 99.55 1,719.56 832.62 76.80 40.76 121.17 PAGE 7 CHECK AHOUIIT 18,712,15 VOUCHRE2 02/09/95 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 22134 2213~ 221:34.54 22134 22134 22134 22135 22135 22135 22135 22135 22135 22135 22135 22135 22135 22136 22137 22137 22137 22137 22137 22137 22137 22137 22137 22137 22137 22137 22138 22139 22140 22140 12:37 CHECK DATE 02109195 02109195 02109195 02109195 02109195 02109195 02109195 02/09/95 02109195 02/0~/95 02/0~/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02109195 02109195 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/0o/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 VEMDOR NUHBER 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000245 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000580 001537 001537 001537 001537 001537 001537 001537 001537 001537 001537 001537 001537 000255 000260 000260 VENDOR NAME CITY OF TENECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION PEAS (HEALTH INSIJR. PRE 000245 PEAS (HEALTH INSlJR. PRE 000245 PEAS (HEALTH [NSUR. PRE 000245 PEAS (HEALTH [NSUR. PRE 000245 PEAS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PEAS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PEAS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PEAS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PEAS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PEAS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PEAS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PEAS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PEAS (HEALTH INSUP,. PRE 000245 PEAS (HEALTH INSUP,. PRE 000245 PEAS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PEAS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PEAS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PEAS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PHOTO ~IORKS PRINCIPAL MUTUAL, INC. PRINCIPAL MUTUAL, INC. PRINCIPAL MUTUAL, INC. PRINCIPAL MUTUAL, [NC. PRINCIPAL MUTUAL, INC. PRINCIPAL MUTUAL, INC. PRINCIPAL MUTUAL, INC. PRINCIPAL MUTUAL, INC. PRINCIPAL MUTUAL, INC. PRINCIPAL MUTUAL, INC. PRINCIPAL MUTUAL, INC. PRINCIPAL MUTUAL, INC. PRO LOCK & KEY PUGH, PAHELA RAN-TEC RUBBER STAMP MF RAN-TEC RUBBER STAMP MF BLSH[ELD HELTllET HELTHNET HELTHNET HELTHNET HELTHNET KAISERSO KAISERSO KAISERSO PACIFICR PACIFICIt PC PEAS CHO PEAS REV TAKECARE TAKECARE TAKECARE EMPLOYEE PAID PORTIOR(LITTELL) PETTY CASH REIMB. PETTY CASH REIMB. PETTY CASH REII!. PETTY CASH REINB. PETTY CASH REINB. PETTY CASH REIMB. PETTY CASH REINB. PETTY CASH REINB. PETTY CASH REINIl. PETTY CASH REINB. FILM AND DEVELOPING 001537 DENT ADV 001537 DENTALlaN 001537 DENTALPI'I 001537 DENTALFq'I 001537 DENTALPIe 001537 DENTALPIe 001537 DENTALPN 001537 DENTALPM OO1537 DENTALlaN 001537 DENTAL!aN 001537 DENTALIqR 001537 DENTALPH CITY HALL LOCKSMITH SERVICES REFUND FOR TCSl) CLASS APPROVAL STANP/BLDG PLANS TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-2090 001-2090 100-2090 165-2090 190-2090 001-2090 190-2090 340-2090 001-2090 100-2090 001-2090 001-2090 001-2090 001-2090 100-2090 280-2090 001-1170 001 - 140-999-5220 190-183-999-5320 1 O0-164-60~-5220 001 - 140-999-5260 100-164-601-5261 1 O0 - 164 -602 - 5260 001-163-99q-5220 190-180-9<~-5220 001 - 100-9~-5220 001 - 100-(~9-5250 001 - 171-999-5250 001-1180 001-2340 100-2340 165-2~0 190-23~ 191-2.~0 192-2340 193-2340 280-234,0 300-23~0 330-23~0 3~0o2340 :340-199-999-5212 190-183-4982 001-162-999-5242 001-162-999-5242 ITEM AM(XJNT 20.45 277.18 14.11 7.81 55.18 8.10 5.92 17.87 3.15 35.26 23.32 121 43.05 822.98- 15.14 7.97 192.06 14.18 87.70 23.69 7.98 28.30 20.00 11.77 12.13 18.86 20. O0 29.82 69.5~ 1,156.12 295.42 17.16 197.69 7.32 42.90 8.~ 8.58 10.72 42.90 49.33 18.32 35.00 175 .SO 13.56 CHECK MqOUNT 20,764.64 2/~.61 29.82 1,906.62 18.32 35.00 l&,..,o 02/~ ~ VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 22141 22141 22141 22141 22141 22141 22141 22141 22142 22143 22164 22145 22145 22146 2c,,/ 22147 22147 22147 22148 22149 22150 22151 22151 22152 22152 22152 22152 22152 22152 22152 22152 22153 22154 12:37 CHECK DATE 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02109195 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02109195 02/09/95 02/O9/95 02/O9/95 Viii)OR MUI!ER 000262 000262 000262 000262 000262 000262 000262 000262 000266 001169 000275 000275 000277 00070~ 00070~ 000704 000704 000704 00070~ 000403 001546 000302 000302 001547 001547 001547 001547 001547 001547 001547 001547 000168 000307 00O876 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER RANCHO CALIFORNIA gATER RANCHO CAL/FORN]A MATER RANCHO CALIFORNIA RATER RANCHO CALIFORNIA MATER RANCHO CALIFORNIA MATER RANCHO CALIFORNIA MATER RHODES, IRViN RIGHTMAY RIVERSIDE CO. CLERK OF ROMERO, LUCI Ra4ERO, LUCI S & S ARTS AND CRAFTS, S K S, INC/INLAND OiL S K Se INC/INLAND OIL S K S, ZNC/INLAND OIL S K S, INC/INLAND OIL S K S, INC/INLAND OIL S K S, ]NC/INLAND OIL SCHULTZ, VICKI SHAtal SCOTT POOL & SPA STRAIGHT LXNE GLASS SYSTEM SOURCE, INC. SYSTEM SOURCE, INC, TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 TEAHSTERS LOCAL 911 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 TEMECULA FLC/aER CORRAL TEMECULA TROPHY CO. TEMECULA VALLEY BALLOON CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS [TEN DESCRIPTION 01-06-84300-1 12/14-1/16/95 01-08-18506-2 12/8-1/17/95 MATER SERVICE 12/12-1/12/95 MATER SERVICE 12/12-1/12/95 MATER SERVICE 12/12-1/12/95 MATER SERVXCE 12/12-1/12/95 MATER SERVICE lZ/12-1/12/95 MATER SERVICE 12/12-1/12/95 REFUND FOR TCSO CLASS PORTABLE TOILET t YARD NOT]CE OF DETERMINATION FILING WHKSHP:PERF. NRASI. JItES 1/19 LR WHKSHP:PERF. MEASURES 1/19 LR SUPPLIES FOR 1401414Y & ME CLASS FUEL EXPENSE FUEL EXPENSE FUEL EXPENSE FUEL EXPENSE FUEL EXPENSE FUEL EXPENSE REFUND FOR TCSU CLASS POOL PAINT. SERVICES ]NSTALL MIRROR i CITY HALL TABLE DESK TAX 001547 UN DUES 001547 UN DUES 001547 UN DUES 001547 UN DUES 001547 ON DUES 001547 UN DUES 001547 UN DUES 001547 UN DUES FLOWERS FOR EMPLOYEES SPORTS PROGRAMS TROPHYS TOURISM TENT SPOSORSH]P 1995 ACCOUNT NUMBER 100-164-601-5240 190-180-999-5240 190-180-999-5240 190-181-999-5240 190-182-999-5240 191 - 180-999-5240 193-180-999-5240 7~0-199-999-5240 190-183-4966 100-164-601-5238 001-171-999-5470 001-140-999-5261 001-140-999-5262 190-183-999-5320 100-1990 001-165-999-5263 001-163-999-5263 190-180-999-5263 001-110-999-5263 001-162-999-5263 190 - 183 - 4982 190-180-999-5212 340-199-999-5212 001-140-999-5601 001-140-999-5601 001-2125 100-2125 165-2125 190-2125 191-2125 19~-2125 300-2125 320-2125 001-2170 190-183-999-5380 280-1990 ITEM AMOUNT 16.45 39.14 701.71 432.O8 8~.39 11.27 12.00 57.39 78.00 113.00 45.60 6/,0.94 635.92 84.20 128.96 141.16 49.77 28.30 40.00 95.20 118.25 300.00 23.25 456.32 75.56 7.40 85.10 8.33 28.67 4.62 18.50 124.99 16.17 7,500.00 PAGE 9 CHECK N~XlNT 2,207.60 12.00 57.39 158.60 640.9~ 1,068.31 40.00 95.20 118.25 323.25 684.50 124.99 16.17 7,500.00 VOUCHRE2 02/09/95 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 22156 22157 22157 22157 22157 22157 22158 22159 22159 22159 22159 22159 22159 22160 22160 22160 22161 22161 22161 22161 22162 22162 22162 22162 22162 22163 22164 22165 22165 22165 22166 12:37 CHECK DATE 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02109195 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02109195 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02109/95 02/09/95 02109/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 0Z/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 02/09/95 VENDOR NUMBER 000306 000642 000642 000642 000642 000642 001065 001065 001065 001065 001065 001065 000389 000389 000389 000325 000525 000325 000325 000326 000326 000326 000326 000326 001076 000345 000345 000345 000346 VENDOR NAME TEHECULA VALLEY PIPE & TEMECULA, CiTY OF - FLE TENECULA, CITY OF - FLE TE14ECULA, CITY OF - FLE TE14ECULA, CITY OF - FLE TENECULA~ CITY OF - FLE TSCHANZ, PHYLLIS CITY OF TENECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION TCSD MAINT SUPPLIES FLEX BENEFITS REINB. FLEX BENEFITS REZNB, FLEX BENEFITS REZNB. FLEX BENEFITS REiNB. JAN 95 ADJUSTMENT FOR P/R REFUND FOR TCSD CLASS U S C 14/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 U S C H/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 U S C N/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 U S C 14/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 u S C N/PEBSCO COBRA) 000389 U S C M/PEBSCO COBRA) 000389 u S C M/PEBSCO COBRA) 000389 DEF CONP DEF CONP DEF COHP DEF CClIP DEF COHP DEF CONP PT RETIR PT RETIR PT RET[R UNITED gAY OF THE [NLAN 000325 UNITED MAY OF THE INLAN 000325 IN UNITED MAY OF THE iNLAN 000325 IN UNITED gAY OF THE INLAN 000325 UW ACCOUNT NUMBER UNiTOG RENTAL SERVICE, UNZTOG RENTAL SERVICE, UNZTOG RENTAL SERVICE, UNZTOG RENTAL SERVICE, UNZTOG RENTAL SERVICE, 190-180-999-5212 laSSTERN WASTE, iNC. 001-1020 190-1020 100-1020 300-1020 001-1020 WRIGHT, NARLA 190-11G-4982 XEROX CORPORATiON B]LLI XEROX CORPORATION B]LLi XEROX CORPORATION BILL[ 001-2080 1 O0- 2080 190-2080 300-2080 320-2080 340-2080 YATES, GRANT 001-2160 100-2160 190-2160 001-2120 100-2120 190-2120 280-2120 UNIFORMS NAINT FOR PW UNIFORM NAINT FOR TCSD FLOOR MATS RENTAL i CITY HALL FLOOR MAT RENTAL t C.R.C FLOOR MATS t SR CNTR 100-164-601-5243 190-180-999-5243 340-199-999-5250 190-182-999-5250 190-181-999-5250 PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL 8 PRKS 190-180-999-5Z.~ REFUND FOR TCSD CLASSES 190 - 183 - 4982 BLACK TONER ~f6R396 FON CSD 330-199-999-5220 LENS & MIRROR CLEANER FOR 5100 330-199-999-5220 TAX 330-199-999-5220 LUNCH REIHB FOR FINANCE OFFICE 001-140-999-5260 ITE14 N40UNT 22.81 3,372.12 95.00 30.25 12.50 8.52 40.00 2,122.08 132.25 271.50 5.01 312.50 50.00 285.54 127.06 210.98 59.35 10.05 17.00 .60 25.85 16.85 34.50 ~.~ 16.75 455.00 560. O0 26.00 45.42 60,00 CHECK Nq0UNT 22.81 3,518.39 40.00 2,89'5.32 621.58 87.00 138.39 455.00 84.00 631.42 60.00 TOTAL CHECKS 114,758.94, 08:29 CITY OF TEHECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 100 GAS TAX FUND 165 RDA DEV- LOI,//ROD SET ASIDE 190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FLINO 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP 300 INSURANCE FUND 320 ]NFORNAT]ON SYSTENS 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 3~0 FACILITIES TOTAL ANOUNT 66,206.53 2,916.00 60.12 9,213.90 7,757.30 20,528.13 89.43 75,105.05 508.8~ 2,935.52 190,206.82 VOUCHRE2 02/16/95 08:29 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE 22167 02/14/~5 22168 02/14/95 22169 02/15/~5 22169 02/15/95 22169 02/15/95 22170 02/15/~5 22177 02/16/~5 22178 02/16/~5 22179 02/16/95 22180 02/16/~5 22180 02/16/95 22181 02/16/95 22181 02/16/95 22182 02/16/95 2218~ 02/16/95 22183 02/16/95 22183 02/16/95 2218.$ 02/16/95 22184 02/16/95 22185 02/16/95 22186 02/16/95 22186 02/16/95 22186 02/16/95 22187 02/16/95 22188 02/16/95 22189 02/16/~5 22190 02/16/95 22191 02/16/95 22192 02/16/95 221~J 02/16/95 CITY OF TENECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NN4E OVERSON, EUGENE 000740 PICCA DELl 001704 001704 001704 OLD TOgN TEMEOULA MAIN OLD TOMN TEMECULA MAIN OLD TOWN TEMECULA MAIN 0001~ COSTCO UHOLESALE CORPOR 000?24 A & R OUSTON SCREEN PRZ 001425 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR CORP. 000102 N~ERICAN FENCE CO. OF C 000101 APPLE ONE, INC, 000101 APPLE ONE, INC. 000622 BANTA ELECTRIC-REFRIGER 000622 BANTA ELECTR/C-REFRIGER 000402 BERG,/U~RK 000679 000679 000679 000679 BOGRAPH/CS PRINTING PLU BOGRAPHICS PRINTING PLU BOGRAPHICS PRINTING PLU BOSRAPHICS PRINTING PLU 000128 000126 000126 000126 000127 001723 000489 001029 001673 001724 001722 ITEM DESCR I PT l OR REPLACE CK 13216 DATED 5/27/92 LURCH FOR SNYDER LANGSTON MEET COOPERAT]VE AOREEMENT ADVERT]NG COST-PROGRAM D[RECTO ADVERT/NG COST-PROSRAN DIRECTO CABINETS FOR FIRE DEPT. SPORTS PROGRANS AgARDS 6015202 TH TEMP FENCE RENTAL -FEB 95 TEMP HELP g/E 1/28 SUTTON TENP HELP g/E 2/4 BUTTOM ELECTRICAL MAINTENANCE ELECTRICAL MAINTENANCE ANNUAL MORK BOUT ALLCNANCE 2 SHEETS PHOTO READY LOGO 3" 2 SHEETS PHOTO READY LOGO 2" 1 SHEET PHOTO READY LOGO 1" TAX REFUND FOR TCSD CLASS BOLLENS, REBECCA CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA EXTRA VORK t NEIGHBORHOOD PRKS CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA EXTRA VORK t NEIGHBORHOOD PRKS CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA EXTRA M3RK i NEIGHBORHO00 PRKS CALIFORNIAN, INC. -LEGA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEANINGS CHACOR, DAVID CO~B OROUP, THE DATAIJICK, INC. DIVERSIFIED TEMPORARY S DORBS, ODLLEEN EDMARDS, SALLY ACCOUNT NONBER 1~0-180-4060 001-110-~-5260 280 - 1 ~90 001 - 150-~-5222 001 - 150-~9-5254 '001-171 -~-5470 190-183-999-5380 320-199-9q~-5208 1~0-180-99~-52)8 330-1q~-~-5118 330-199-999-5118 190-180-9F~-5212 190-180-999-5212 001-162-99~-5243 330-1~-~-5220 5"50-199-~-5220 330-1F}-~-5220 330-1 ~-~)~-5220 190-183-4982 PUBLIC OFFICIAL BOND:R.BRADLEY 300-1~-~-5200 1~0-180-999-5415 190-180-~9~-5415 190-180-~9~-5415 001-161-~-5256 PNT FOR TCSD ]NSTRUCTOR 190-183-999-5330 INSIDE OUATTRO PRO: 12 ISSUES )20-1~-;-5228 FEB 95 ACCESS CHARGES 320-1~9-;-5250 TEMP HELP WE 1/26 FRITCHEY 001-161-~9~-5118 PMT FOR TCSU INSTRUCTOR 190-18)-~99-5330 Iq4T FOR TCSO INSTRUCTOR 1~0-183-~-5330 I T EM AMOUNT 82.02 77.04 73,000.00 299.01 - 618.87- 290.~0 879.24 58.89 145.00 361.20 361.20 68.15 286.00 95.00 15.00 15.00 10.00 3.10 55. O0 500.00 454. O0 347.50 869.50 16.65 192.00 49. O0 85.24 14~.48 112.00 272.00 CHECK AHOUNT '.U.02 77.04 ~,~2.12 2~.90 879.~ 58.~ 145.00 722.40 43.10 55.00 500.00 1,671.00 16.65 1~.~ 1~.~ 112.00 02/. ,~ VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 2219~ 22194 221~5 221~ 22197 22197 22197 22197 22197 22197 22199 22200 22200 22201 2220'1 22201 22201 22202 22203 2220/, 22205 22206 22206 22207 22208 22209 22210 22210 CHECK DATE 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VENDOR VENDOR ]TEN NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION 000754 ELLIOTT GRCUP, THE 000754 ELLIOTT GROUP, THE PLAN CK SERVICES FOR DEC 9~ PLAN CK SERVICES FOR JAN 95 ELLISON, VALERIE REFUI) FOR TCSO CLASS 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. EXPRESS PAIL SERVICE 001002 001002 001002 001002 001002 001002 FIRST INTERSTATE BANK C 5473 666~ 0391 0099 JS FIRST INTERSTATE RANK C REFUND OPENING BALANCE FIRST iNTERSTATE RANK C 5473 6664 0391 0172 RB FIRST INTERSTATE BANK C 5473 6664 0391 0172 RB FIRST INTERSTATE BANK C 5473 6664 0391 0115 JG FIRST INTERSTATE BANK C 5473 6664 0391 0057 SN 000993 FREEDOM COFFEE, INC. COFFEE SUPPLIES CITY HALL FREITAS, KRISTIRA REFUND FOR TCSO CLASS 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909 694-6400 GEM 00018~ G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909 695-3539 GRN 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909 699-0128 GEM 00018~ G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909 699-2309 GEM 000178 GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO REPAIR PARTS FOR MONITOR 000178 GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO LABOR CHARGE FOR MONITOR REPAR 000178 GOLDEN STATE TRN)]NG CO FREIGHT 000178 GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO TAX GRANA, KERRY REFUND FOR TCSD CLASS 001517 HEALTH & HUMAN RESOURCE EMPLOYEE ASS/STANCE PROGRAM IAEI gKSHP: 1&2 FAMILY DgELLING JR 001429 ]MACON ]NFORPAT]ON SYST SOFTWARE: PRINT SHOP DELUXE 001123 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIE PAINT CREW SUPPLIES 001123 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIE TAX 000209 L & M FERTILIZER, INC. MISC PAINT SUPPLIES 0015:3~ LA PASTERS OF FINE TRAV R.RORERTS FLT RALTINORE 3/9-15 001658 LIENHARD CONSULTING ORO COleUTER TRAINING ON-SITE 000214 LUNCH & STUFF CATERING CITY COUNCIL MEETING 2/14/95 000214 LUNCH & STUFF CATERING ECONOMIC GROUP MEETING 2/14/95 001531 PALEK, SUSAN PMT FOR TCSD INSTRUCTOR 001142 liARKHAN & ASSOCIATES PROF. SERVICES FOR JAN 95 ACC~_NT NI. NBER' 001-161-999-5250 001-161-999-5250 190-18~-4982 320-199-999-5230 001-100-999-5258 001-140-999-5226 001-110-999-5228 001-110-999-5260 001-120-999-5258 190-180-999-5260 340-199-999-5250 190-183-4982 320-199-999-5208 320-199-999-5208 320-199-999-5208 320-199-999-5208 320-199-999-5215 320-199-999-5215 320-199-999-5215 320-199-999-5215 190-18~-4982 001-150-999-5248 001-162-999-5261 320-199-999-5221 100-16~-601-5218 100-164-601-5218 100-164-601-5218 001-100-999-5258 320-199-999-5250 001-100-999-5260 280-199-999-5250 190-183-999-5330 100-164-603-5248 ITEM AMOUNT 1,210.00 3,~40.00 55.00 6.75 199.86 40.00- 60.45 42.00 131.73 40.38 132.20 55.00 ~47.77 39.81 1,6~8.68 35.64 45. OO 210.00 20.00 3.49 35.00 328.25 129.00 69~.24 53.73 31.19 373. O0 900.00 80.00 32.50 168.00 62,13 PAGE CHECK AMOUNT 4,650.00 55. O0 6.75 434.42 132.20 55.00 2,161,90 278.49 35 328.25 129.00 89.73 7~6.97 31.19 373.00 900,00 112.50 168.00 62.13 VOUCHRE2 02/16/~5 VOUCHER/ CHECK NU!eER 22213 22213 22213 22213 22214 22215 22216 22216 22217 22217 22217 22217 22217 22217 22217 22217 22217 22217 22217 22218 22218 22219 22220 22221 22221 22221 22221 22222 22222 22222 22222 222:r4 22223 22223 22224 22225 22225 22226 08:29 CHECK DATE 02116/95 02116/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16195 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 VENDOR NU!~ER 000219 000219 000219 000219 001242 001242 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000580 000580 000254 000947 000262 000262 000262 000262 0009O7 000907 000907 000907 000~26 000426 000353 000353 000~18 VENDOR NAME MARTIN 1-HOUR PHOTO lIARTIN 1-HOUR PHOTO MARTIN 1-HOUR PHOTO MARTIN 1-HOUR PHOTO MC DERHOTT, BRIDCtT MOROZ, CONNIE NATIONAL TECHNICAL INFO NATIONAL TECHNICAL INFO PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PHOTOMIRKS PHOTOMORKS PRESS-ENTERPRiSE CONPAN RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C RANCHO CALIFORNIA MATER RANCHO CALIFORNIA MATER RANCHO CALIFORNIA MATER RANCHO CALIFORNIA MATER RANCHO CAR MASH RANCHO CAR MASH NANCHO CAR MASH RANCHO CAR MASH RANCHO INDUSTRIAL $UPPL NANCHO INDUSTRIAL $UPPL NANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL RIVERSIDE CO NATIONAL D RIVERSIDE CO. AUDITOR RIVERSIDE CO. AUDITOR RIVERSIDE CO. CLERK AND CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTZON PHOTO DEVELOPING & FILM PHOTO DEVEL. FOR LAND DIVISION PHOTO DEVEL FOR CAPITAL PRJTS PHOTO DEVEL FOR MAINT DIVISION REFUND FOR TCSD CLASS REIMB. FOR EXERCISE VIDEO STANDARD INIXISTRIAL CLASS NANU STANDARD INTRIAL CLASS MAIN PETTY CASH REIMB. PETTY CASH REIll. PETTY CASH REIMB. PETTY CASH REINB. PETTY CASH REINB. PETTY CASH REINB. PETTY CASH REINB. PETTY CASH REIMB. PETTY CASH REINB. PETTY CASH REIMB. PETTY CASH REIMB. FILM AND SLIDE DEVELO!~ENT FILM AND SLIDE DEVELOPMENT DISPLAY AD OLD TOgN PROJECT BLUEPRINT REPRODUCTION 01-08-18505-2 1218-1117195 MATER SERVICE 12/22 - 1124195 MATER SERVICE 12/22 - 1/24/95 MATER SERVICE 12/22 - 1/24/95 CAR UASH & MAINT FOR LAND DEVE CAR MASH & NAINT. FOR CIP CAR MASH & MAINT FOR B & S CAR MASH & MAINT FOR TCSD SR CNTR BUILDING SLIPPLIES SR CNTR BUILDING SUPPLIES TCSD BUILDING MAINT SUPPLIES TCSO FIELD TRIP - 02123195 PARKING CITATION ASSESS JAN 95 PARKING CITATION ASSESS JAN 95 NICROFICHE DUPLICATES ACCOUNT NUMBER' 100-164-602-5250 001-163-999-5250 001-165-999-5230 100-16~-601-5250 190-183-4982 190-183-~-5320 001-140-999-5220 001-110-999-5220 001-140-999-5220 001-161-999-5260 001-150-999-5265 001-150-999-5220 190-180-999-5260 001-100-999-5260 320-199-999-5220 001-162-999-5260 100-16/.-602-5260 100-164-604-5220 001-163-999-5242 190-180-999-5301 190-180-t~9-5301 001-120-999-5254 210-165-625-5802 190-180-999-5240 190-180-999-5240 191-180-999-5240 193-180-999-5240 001-163-999-5214 001-165-999-5214 001-162-999-5214 190-180-999-5214 190-181-999-5212 190-181-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 190-183-999-5350 001-2260 001-2265 001-163-999-5220 ITEM AMOUNT 12.83 83.92 61.94 65.47 70.00 14.95 26.65 55.00 86.67 8.35 20. O0 2.00 21.14 4,8.47 30.00 40.9~ 32.28 10.76 19.59 45.60 46.55 39.14 55.53 54.66 632.73 12.30 4.00 8.00 8.00 139.86 134.07 150.96 90.00 290.00 250.00 5.00 CHECK AHOUNT 224.16 70.00 14.95 68.00 37'i ..~Y 30.35 45.60 ~6.55 762.06 32,30 424.~ ~.~ vC( 02/ VOUCHER/ CHECK NUllER 22227 22228 22229 22230 22230 22231 22231 22232 22233 2223/, 22234 22234 2223~ 22234 22234 222.~ 2223~ 22235 22236 22236 22236 22236 22236 22236 22236 22236 22236 22236 22236 22236 22236 22236 22236 22236 22236 08:29 CHECK DATE 02/16/~5 02/16/95 02/16/g5 02/16/~5 02/16/~5 02/16/~5 02/16/~5 02/16/~5 02/16/95 02/16/g5 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/~5 02/16/g5 02/16/~5 02/16/~5 02/16/~5 02/16/g5 02/16/~5 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 VENDOR NLNBER 001169 000268 000269 000269 000277 000824 000537 000537 000537 000537 000537 000537 000537 000537 000537 000537 000537 000537 000~26 000375 000375 000375 000375 000375 000375 000375 000375 000375 000375 000375 000375 000375 000375 000375 000375 000375 000375 VENDOR NANE RIVERSIDE CO. CLERK OF RIVERSIDE CO. HABITAT RIVERSIDE CO. NATIONAL RIVERSIDE OFFICE SUPPLY RIVERSIDE OFFICE $tJPPLY ROORIGUEZ, HECTOR & AlE RODRIGUEZ, HECTOR&RNE S & S ARTS AND CRAFTS, SOUTHERN CALIF ASS(X: OF SOUTHERN CAL]F ED/SON - SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON - SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON - SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON - SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON - SOUTHERN CALIF BISON - SOUTHERN CALIF EDZSON - SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON - SOUTHERN CAL[F EDISON - SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON - SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON - SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON - SOUTHERN CAL]F EDISON - SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHOR SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHOR SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON SOUTHERN CAL[F TELEPHOR SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHOR SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON SOUTHERN CAL]F TELEPHON SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON SOUTHERN CAL[F TELEPHON SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHOR SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON CITY OF TENEOULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS ITEN DESCRIPTION RESEARCH TR19872 PALA RD BRDGE K-RAT FOR DEC 94/JAN 95 TCSD FIELD TR[P- 2/21/95 COLOR COPY PAPER STOCK TAX TCSD TAX REFUND FY ffe-95 TCSD TAX REFUND FY 94-95 lIPPLIES FOR NOMMY & lIE, IKSHP: SCAG 3/2-3/95 RON PARKS ELECT FOR ST L]GHTS 12/31-1/31 ELECT FOR ST LIGHTS 12/31-1/31 52-77-7W>-7050-02 1/4-2/2/95 52-77-812-gB&1-01 1/4 - 2/2/95 52-77-899-0011-02 1/4 -2/2/95 52-77-8~-1f35-02 52-77-8~-2622-02 1/4-2/2/95 53-77-800-1403-01 1/5-2/2/95 53-77-850-2948-01 1/4-2/3/95 53-77-850-57V5-01 1/4-2/3/95 56-77-755-0157-01 1/10-2/7/95 56-77-755-0169-01 1/10-2/7-95 lETALL ELECT i NARAGITA RD t 202-4204 KL 909 202-4762 RP ~89 202-4758 RR f09 202-4761 ge 989 205-4070 MJM f89 202-4757 JG 989 205-7826 GR ~89 202-5153 GY ~89 202-476~ BB el9 202-4765 BB ~9 202-4760 JH 989 206-0992 BH re9 202-4755 CITY VAN ~8~ 202-4754 KH I 312-0474 SN ~8~ 202-4759 TE fO~ 202-476~ JS fO~ 202-4770 RB re9 202-4756 KRTM UNASSIGNED ACCOUNT NtAqBER 001 - 163-~-5220 001-2300 190-183-999-5350 330-1999- 999- 5220 330-199-999-5220 190 - 180 - 4005 191-180-4003 1~0-183-~q~-5320 001-100-~-5258 191-180-999-5319 192-180-999-5319 190-180-999-5240 190-180-999-5240 lg3-180-~-5240 lf0-180-~-5240 193-180-~-5240 191-180-~-5319 191-180-~-5319 191-180-~-5240 191-180-~-5319 191-180-~-5319 210-165-6~2-5804 001-100-~-5208 001-100-~-5208 001-100-~-5208 001-100-~-5208 001-110-~-5208 001-120-~-5208 001-140-~-5208 001-150-~-5208 100-164-601-5208 100-164-681-5208 100-164-683-5208 1~0-180-~-5208 190-180-999-5208 1~0-180-~-5208 1~0-180-f~-5208 001-162-~-5208 001-100-~-5208 001-110-~-5208 320-199-~-5208 ITEM N~UNT 5.30 54,7~5.00 90.00 399. O0 30.92 246.38 15 42.97 60,00 7,252.61 20,520.17 729.62 16.55 15.95 6~.8,?. 15 39.69 46.25 16.50 206.27 6Z.Tg 42 52.78 83.72 54.64 141.35 114.95 43.49 92.90 179.68 56.27 111.01 53.33 52.~0 131,41 8O .30 71.25 40.22 36.35 PAGE 4 CHECK · * 5.30 54,795.00 90.00 429.92 261.64 42.97 60.00 28,g86.17 42.88 1,533.25 VOUCHRE2 02/16/~5 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUHBER 22237 22237 22238 22239 22240 22240 222/,0 22240 22240 22240 22240 22240 22240 22240 22240 22240 22240 22241 22242 22243 22244 22245 22246 22247 22248 22248 22249 22250 22251 22252 22252 22252 08:29 CHECK DATE 02116195 02116195 02116195 02116195 02116/95 02116/95 02/16195 02/16/95 02116195 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 02/16/95 VENDOR NUHBER 000282 000282 000291 000293 000294 000294 000294 000294 000294 000294 000294 000294 00029~ 000294 00029~ 00029/, 000294 000A65 001497 000305 000307 001487 000320 000326 000326 000345 000345 000345 CITY OF TENECtJLA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PER[OI)S SOUTHERN CALIF. NIJNICIP SOUTHERN CALIF. INNICIP SPEE DEE OIL CHANGE & T STADIUM PIZZA STATE FUND - SAN FRANCZ STATE FUND - SAN FRANCI STATE FUND - SAN FRANCZ STATE FUND - SAIl FRANCI STATE FUND - SAN FRANC/ STATE FUND - SAN FRANC/ STATE FUND o SAN FRANCI STATE FUND - SAN FRANCI STATE FUND - SAN FRANCI STATE FUND - SAN FRANCI STATE FUel) - SAN FRANCI STATE FUND - SAN FRANCI STATE FUND - SAN FRANCI STRADLEY, MARY KATHLEEN SUSIE'S OFFICE SUPPORT T R g, INC.-INFORMATION TARGET STORE TENEOULA TROPHY CO. TIERRA MECHANICAL, INC. ITEN DESCRIPTION VOLLEYBALL RULEBCX:)KS SOFTBALL RULEBOOKS OIL CHANGE FOR B&S VEHICLE STATE OF THE CITY LUNCHEON WORKERS' COHP. FOR JAN 95 UORKERS' COMP. FOR JAN 95 WORKERS' C(NP. FOR JAN 95 UORKERS' CONP, FOR JAN 95 I)RKERS' COMP, FOR JAN 95 WORKERS' COI4P. FOR JAN 95 WORICERS' COHP. FOR JAN 95 tI)RKERS' COHP. FOR JAN 95 WORKERS' CCl4P. FOR JAN 95 UORKERS' COMP. FOR JAN 95 M3RICERS' C014P. FOR JAN 95 WORKERS' COMP. FOR JAN 95 MORKERS' COHP. FOR JAN 95 PHT FOR TCSD INSTRUCTOR REFUND OF BUSINESS LICENSE RDA CREDIT REPORTS INFORMATION RECREATION SUPPLIES SPORTS PROGRN~S AMARDS SR CNTR HEAT SYSTEN EVALUATION TOWNE CENTER STATIONERS OFFICE SUPPLIES/PW UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE, UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE, VOLLINTH, MARY WELLS, HEATHER WHITEHEN), RNONDA XEROX CORPORATION BILLI XEROX CORPORATION BILLI XEROX CORPORATION BILLI UNIFORN MAINT FOR TCSD UNIFONHS MAINT PW REFUND FOR TCSD CLASS REFUND FOR TCSD CLASS PHT FOR TCSD INSTRUCTOR HETER USAGE FOR 12/27-1/26/95 FAX IMAGING CARTRIDGE REFILLS TAX TOTAL CHECKS ACCOUNT NUNBER 190-182-999-5220 190-182-999-5220 001-162-999-5214 001 - 150-999-5265 :100-2370 165-2370 191-2370 192-2370 280 - 23 70 300-2370 320-2370 330-2370 340-2370 001-1182. 190-183-999-5330 001-199-4056 280-199-999-5250 190-180-999-5301 190-183-999-5:380 190-181-999-5212 100-164-60~-5220 190-180-999-5243 100-16~-601-5243 190-183-4982 190-183-4982 190-183-999-5330 330-199-999-5239 330-19~-999-5220 330-199-999-5220 ITER ANOUNT 30.00 434.00 20.99 323.40 3,329.28 1,541.31 40.12 1,435.61 8~.27 7.96 118.49 22.55 8.84 21.41 281.78 56.90 320.00 35.00 50,00 43.11 19.40 135.00 14.71 16,85 23.50 65.00 35.00 1,389.27 321.00 24.88 CHECK AMOUNT 464.00 20of9 323.40 6,952.47 35.00 50.00 43.11 19.40 135.00 14.71 40,35 ~.~ 35.~ 304.00 1,735.15 v~/'''' ~ FUND 001 07:51 T|TLE GENERAL FUND TOTAL CITY OF TENECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PER[QOS ANOUIIT 429,6.:.t4.74 429,634.74 PAGE VOUCHRE2 02/21/95 07:51 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR NUMBER DATE NI.14BER 22281 02/17/95 00179~ 22282 02/17/95 001805 22283 02/17/95 O01 22284 02/17195 O01823 22285 02/17/95 001834 22286 02/17/95 001801 22287 02/17/95 001783 22288 02/17/95 22289 02/17/95 22290 02/17/95 22291 02/17/95 001849 22292 02/17/95 001797 22293 02/17/95 001861 22294 02/17/95 001773 22295 02/17/95 O01795 22296 02/17/95 0018~1 22297 02/17/95 001768 22298 02/17/95 O01832 22299 02/17/95 001791 22300 02/17/95 001777 22301 02/17/95 00177V 22302 02/17/95 0017~,G 22303 02/17/95 001756 2230~ 02/17/95 001820 22305 02/17/g5 001778 22306 02/17/95 001852 VENDOR NAME AFENIR, RICHARD k/& NIC ALLEN, BURTON D & MARY ALLEN, IJILLIAH E & CARO ATKINSON, DAVID N BABER, TERESE J BAGSBY, SHEBALD BALL, ALVIN R. 001856 BANK OF ARERICA NATL TR 001833 BARGIELSK[, SHEAR1A 001800 BASSLEA, JARES R & KATH BECHTOLD, RUTH A BEDELL, JARES A BEDFORD DEVELOPNENT CO BELLANY, ROBERT E & NYL BELLAVANCE, DONALD BLASCO, DAVID A & SUSAN BOTTIN0, SUSAN C &gARR BRISENDINE, SHIZU BURGER, CHRIST]NA R CAHACHO, NEWTON K CARRASCO, ENRIQUE S & A CARUSO, CHARLES A. CLARK, PORTER A & LUCIL CLARKSON, ANITA T COHARD, DENNIS E & JANI C(X3K, CARAlE L CITY OF TEHECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS [TEN DESCRIPTION SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASS]STANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASS]STANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASS]STANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE ACCOUNT NUNBER 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 001-20]0 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 O01 - 2030 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 [TEN AHOUNT 200.70 200.70 200.70 200.70 200.70 200.70 200.70 2,670.86 200.70 200.70 200.70 200.70 12,187.42 200.70 200.70 200.70 200.70 200.70 200.70 200.70 200.70 200.70 200.70 200.70 200.70 200.70 CHECK AHOUNT 200.70 200.70 200.70 200.70 200.70 200.70 200.70 2,670.86 200.70 200.70 2F..-..~. 20u.~O 12,187.42 200.70 200.70 200.70 200.70 200.70 200.70 200.70 200.70 200.70 200.70 ~ ....0 021, . .j 07:51 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUNBER DATE 22307 02117195 27'400 02/17/95 22309 02/17/~5 22310 02/17/95 22311 02117195 22312 02/17/95 22313 02/17/95 22314 02/17/95 22315 02/17/95 22315 02/17/95 22316 02/17/95 02/17/95 22318 02/17/95 22319 02/17/95 22320 02/17/95 22321 02/17/95 22322 02117/95.001755 22323 02/~7/95 0018~0 22324 02/17/95 22325 02/17/95 22326 02/17/95 22~27 02/17/95 22328 02/17/95 22329 02/17/95 22~30 02/17/95 /---~. 02/17/95 VENDOR VENDOR NUIIER RANE 001733 COUNTRY~IDE FUNDING COR 001749 DALLY TRUST 001761 DARRACH, gILL[AN J, 001735 DEL TACO RESTAURANT PRO 001793 DESCHAIR, JACQUES & L 001764 DIAZ, AUSENCIO & ELVA A 001789 DOERR, JOSEPH R 001830 DONALDSON, HILLARY H 001726 ELI LILLY & CONPANY 001726 ELI LILLY & CONPANY 001810 FINN, DANIEL F & NICOLE 001826 FINNEGAN, SCOTT R 001792 FUENTEZ, TRAVIS L 001818 GABBARD, KARYN L 00180~ GEBAUER, W[LLIAN A 001725 GORDON, SARA L. GOSCH TRUST GOULD, L]NMOOD P 001812 GREGORY, THONAS L 0018~& ORGAS, DOROTHY 001851 OUERRERO, ELISA N 001853 HARRISON, JOHN R & JUDY 001828 HATHCOCK, DONALD L & IS 00182Z HAZLETT, CHRIST]NE A 0017~ HENDERSON, DAVID & KATH 001817 HODGES, HARK S CITY OF TENEOULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PER[COS ITEH DESCRIPTION GALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX US]STANCE GALES TAX ASSISTANCE GALES TAX ASSISTANCE GALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE GALES TAX ASSISTANCE GALES TAX ASS[STANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASS]STANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASS]STANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE GALES TAX ASS]STANCE SALES TAX ASS]STANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE GALES TAX ASSISTANCE ACCOUNT NUNBER 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 O01 - 2030 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 ITBI NIOUNT 401.40 200.70 200.70 2,255.97 200.70 200.70 200.70 200.70 11,176.13 5,700.38 200.70 200.70 200.70 200.70 200.70 200°70 1,053.~6 200.70 200.70 200.70 200.70 6,327,09 200.70 200.70 200.70 200.70 PAGE CHECK NIXJIlT '401.40 200.70 200.70 2,255 .~7 200.70 200.70 200.70 200.70 16,88~.51 200.70 200.70 200.70 200.70 200.70 1,053./,6 200.70 200.70 200.70 6,321.09 200.70 200.70 200.70 VOUCHRE2 02/21/95 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUI, IER 22~32 22333 22334 22335 22336 22337 22338 223~0 223~0 223~2 223~3 ZZ3~z, 223~5 22346 223~7 223~8 223~9 22350 22351 22352 22353 22356 22355 22~56 07:51 CHECK DATE 02/17/95 02/17/95 02/17/95 02/17/95 02/17/95 02/17/95 02/17/95 02/17/95 02/17/95 02/17/95 02/17/95 02/17/95 02/17/95 02/17/95 02/17/95 02/17/95 02/17/95 02/17/95 02/17/95 02/17/95 02/17/95 02/17/95 02/17/95 02/17/95 02/17/~5 02/17/95 VEIl)OR NUNBER 0017'~ 001827 001835 001766 001775 001787 001737 001829 001858 001858 001762 001765 001846 001730 001838 001763 001850 001826 001728 001803 001774 O01Trl 0018~8 001739 001762 VENDOR NANE HONE SAV]NGS OF ANERZCA HULL, NARK H & BETTE J J/DOT, VALER]E S JOHNSON, CAROL A JOHNSTON, JOSEPH R & CA ERR, BARBARA L IOU, RT CORPORAT ! ON KORNAY, STEVE D & CAR!~ KR PALN PLAZA LTD PARTN KR PALM PLAZA LTD PARTN KREUTZER~ KURT J & KELL LEZSTEN, C[NDY R. LUFKIN, DONNA L I(ARUBEN! NOTOR SERVICE, HAUCER], PAT HAURICE, DAVZD NCGUIRE, THOMAS P MCKEONN, GREGORY S & TA NERVYNS NEYER, D[ANE E NICHALEK, CHARLENE NIMUTELLZ, VINCENT d & NORRO~, PHYLL]S L NUNOZ, JOSE &ARTURO NYERS, VZCK/ 'TRUSTEE' NORTH COUNTY BANK CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PER[OI)S ITEM DESCR]PTION SALES TAX ASS]STANCE SALES TAX ASS]STANCE SALES TAX ASS]STANCE SALES TAX ASS]STANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 O01 - 2030 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 001 - 2030 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 001-20~0 001-2030 001-2030 ITEM AI~UNT 1,918.87 200.70 200.70 200.70 200.70 200.70 18,773.82 200.70 71,490.90 166.39 200.70 200.70 200.70 8,220.03 200.70 200.70 200.70 200.70 16,691.92 200.70 200.70 200.70 200.70 200.70 1,607.70 CHECK ANOUNT 1,918.87 200.70 200.70 200.70 200.70 200.70 18,Tr5.82 200.70 71,6~7.29 200.70 200.70 8,220.03 200.70 200.70 200.70 200.70 16,691.92 200.70 200,70 200.70 200.70 V~ " 02f~_.t5 07:51 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NIJNBER DATE 22357 02/17/95 22358 02/17/95 22359 02/17/95 22~60 02/17/95 22361 02/17/95 22362 02117195 22~6) 02/17/95 22364 02/17/95 22365 02/17/95 2~ 02/17/95 22..?~5 02/17/95 ' 02/17/95 22368 02/17/95 22368 02/17/95 22369 02/17/95 22)70 02/17/95 22371 02/17/95 22372 02/17/95 22373 02/17/95 22~74 02/17/95 22375 02/17/95 22376 02/17/95 22377 02/17/95 22378 02/17/95 2237~ 02/17/95 ;a----', 02/17/95 Z,..__, 02/17/95 CiTY OF TENECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VENDOR VENDOR IitJI~ER NN~E 001814 MORTON, JOHN S & UALTER 001815 ONG, JERRY C 0018~5 OSBORNE, LOURENA K 001790 PACHECO, DAVID E 001808 PARSORS, TAINY L 001780 PATCHEN, DONALD L & DIA 001767 PHILLIPS, DALE B & KATZ 001831 PIERCE, JON & PATRICIA 001807 PORTILLO, JAINE G & ROI4 001759 RANCHO CALiF DEV CO. 001759 RANCHO CALIF DEV CO. 001854 RANCHO 140BILE HOHE ESTA 001860 RANCHO REGIONAL SHOPPIN 001860 RANCHO REGIONAL SHOPPIN 001760 RANCON REALTY FUND IV 001752 REEVES, DONNA L. 001811 RIDDLE, LOUIS W JR & 001750 RIVERSIDE FINANCIAL 0018Z,~ ROOK, MICHAEL C & TRACE 001776 ROTH, DONALD T & MINDY 001782 ROVE, THOHAS C & HELEN 001731 RUBI, FRED A & INA H & 001788 RUSSELL, BOBBY L & LAUR 001859 SAFEUAY STORES, INC, 001839 SALAZAR, RICHARD A & CY 001745 SAN DIEGO TRUST & SAVIN 001813 ITEM DESCRIPTION SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASSISTAliCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASSISTAlICE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASS]STANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASS]STANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SANTY, ROBERT A & D]ANE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE ACCOUNT NUHeER 001-2030 001-20~0 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 001-2~0 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 iTEM N4OUNT 200.70 200.70 200.70 200.70 200.70 200.70 200.70 200.70 200.70 57,203.11 27,273.72 1,W~6,57 76,9'56.35 21,364.87 1,717,97 7,156,87 200.70 3,211.20 200.70 200.70 200.70 200.70 200.70 32,543.01 200.70 200.70 PAGE CHECK AIIOUNT 200.70 200.70 200.70 200.70 200.70 200.70 200.70 200.70 200.70 84,476.83 1,966.57 98,301.22 1,717.97 7,156.87 200.70 ~,211.20 200.70 200.70 200.70 200,70 200.70 32,543.01 200.70 200.70 VOUCHRE2 02/21/95 07:51 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUIqBER DATE 22382 02/17/95 22.383 02/17/95 2238,A. 02/17/95 22385 02/17/95 22386 02117/95 22387 02/17/95 22388 02/17/95 22.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'~902/17/95 22390 02/17/95 22391 02/17/95 22392 02/17/95 22393 02117195 2239/, 02/17/95 22395 02/17/95 22396 02/17/95 22396 02/17/95 22397 02/17/95 22398 02/17/95 22399 02/17/95 22~.00 02/17/95 22~.01 02/17/95 22/,02 02/17/95 22/,03 02/17/95 22/,0/+ 02/17/95 22/,05 02/17/95 22z,06 02/17/95 CITY OF TENECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VENDOR VENDOR NtNBER NANE 001821 SCARBOROUGH, TRACY A 001785 SCOTT, RYAN 001825 SEGURA, EDgARD 001847 SEgUE]RA, DARYL A & JOA 001772 SHERATON, ELIZABETH A, 001816 SHERROD, JANES S 001806 SICIL]ANO, CHARLES A & O01T/'O SITZ, JANES 001729 SPEHAR, RAYNOND G & EST 001751 STALLING, CARLA 001802 STE~/ART, JOSEPH C & JEA 001752 STU~PH, KATHY 00179~ SUNDALE, ERiC S & RACHE 001753 TAVAGLZONE, NICHOLAS E 001738 TO~OND PROPERTIES 0017'58 TOHOND PROPERTIES 0018~7 VEASEY, KENNETH 001781 001786 001842 001784 UARDEN, CHESTER H 00175/~ gE[NGART, HAROLD V & RU 0017~8 I~ELD, LINDA N 00180/, gELLENBRINK, NDgARD t4 & 001857 tJELLS FARGO RANK RATL A 0018~ ~/ILSON, HAUREEN A ITEN DESCRIPTION SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE VEDENTI, JANES I. SALES TAX ASSISTANCE VINCENT, CLAYTON P & TA SALES TAX ASSISTANCE HALTER, HARVEY L & SUSA SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 O01 o 2030 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 ITEM AMOUNT 200.70 200.70 200.70 200.70 200.70 200.70 200.70 200.70 2,852.38 200.70 200.70 200.70 200.70 1,20~..20 9,065.72 390.19 200.70 200.70 200.70 200.70 200.70 200.70 200.70 200.70 3,811.81 200.70 CHE~ AMOUNT 200.70 2~.70 200.70 200.~ 200.70 200.70 200.70 2,~2.38 200.70 2,---~ 20u.rO 200.70 1,2~.~ 9,455.91 200.70 200.70 200.70 200.70 200.70 3,811.81 vd o2/~ ./~ o?:51 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK NUMBER DATE 22407 02/17/95 22408 02/17/95 22409 02117/95 VENDOR NUMBER 001757 0018~3 001819 VENDOR NAHE WILSON, RONALD P & VALID WINCHESTER, NANCY G YOUNG~ NANCY A CITY OF TEMEOULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERZOOS ITEM DESCRIPTION SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE SALES TAX ASSISTANCE ACCOUNT NI. B4BER 001-2030 001-2030 001-2030 ITEM AMOUNT 200.77 200,70 200.?0 PAGE CHECK ANOUNT Z00,77 200,70 200.70 TOTAL CHECKS 429,6.t4.74 VOUCHRE2 02116/95 12:36 CITY OF TENECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 100 GAS TAX FUND 190 COIIiUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 19] TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 210 CAPITAL IHPROVEHENT PROJ FUND 280 REDEVELOPtRENT AGENCY - CIP 300 INSURANCE FUND 320 [NFORNATION SYSTEHS TOTAL Ale3UNT 18~,457.15 3,~50.00 26,783.57 758.~5 2,888.03 17,381.26 41,788.10 6,3Z~4.38 3,536.97 4,563.30 2~2,451.71 02/, J VOUCHER/ CHECK NUNBER 2?2.56 22256 22256 22256 22256 22256 22256 22257 22257 22257 22257 22258 22259 22260 22261 2226~ 22263 22263 22263 2226~ 2226~ 22263 22263 2226] 22264 22265 22266 22267 22267 22267 22268 22269 22269 : 12:36 CHECK DATE 02/28/95 02/28/95 02/28/95 02/28/95 02/28/95 02/28/95 02/28/95 02/28/95 02/28/95 02/28/95 02/28/95 02/28/95 02/28/95 02/28/95 02/28/95 02/28/95 02/28/95 02/28/95 02/28/95 02/28/95 02/28/95 02/28/95 02/28/95 02/28/95 02/28/95 02/28/95 02/28/95 02/28/95 02/28/95 02/28/95 02/28/95 02/28/95 02/28/95 02/28/95 02/28/95 02/28/95 02/28/95 VENOOR NUMBER 000123 00012~ 000123 000123 000123 000123 000123 000126 000126 000126 000126 000684 001714 001056 001056 000~81 000178 000178 000178 000178 000178 000178 000178 000178 000178 001186 000210 001658 001567 001567 001567 000231 001007 001007 001046 001046 VENDOR N/elE BURKE MILLIMIS & SOltENS BURKE VILLIAHS & SO!tENS BURKE VILLIANS& SORENS BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENS BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENS BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENS BURKE WILLIANS & SORENS CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HA CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HA CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HA CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HA DIEHL, EVANS & COMPANY DIX DEVELOPMENT, INC. DREAM ENGINEERING, INC. EXCEL LANDSCAPE EXCEL LANDSCAPE GEOTECHNICAL & ENVIRONM GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO GOLDEN STATE TRAOING GO GOLDEN STATE TRADING GO GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO ]RWIN, JOHN LEAGUE OF CAL. CITIES - LIENHARD CONSULTING GRO HALEK GENERAL CORTRACTO HALEK GENERAL CORTRACTO HALEK GENERAL CONTRACTO N B S/LOWRY, INC. NPG ~P. NPGCORP. REXON, FREEDNAN, KLEPET REXON, FREEDHAN, KLEPET CITY OF TENEOULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS XTEN DESCRIPTION PROF. SERVICES FOR DEC 96 PROF, SERIVCES FOR DEC 96 PROF, SERIVCES FOR DEC 96 PROF. SERIVCES FOR DEC 96 PROF. SERVICES FOR DEC 96 PROF. SERVICES FOR DEC 94 INCORRECTLY TOTAL INV 21095 CRC LANDSCAPE HAINT 2/95 MEDIANS LANDSCAPE HAINT 2/95 NEIGHBORHOOD PRKS HAINT 2/95 SR CNTR LANDSCAPE HAINT 2/95 REVIEW FORM 393 BY PROF. REFUND OF ADVANCED ENERGY FEES DESIGN ATHLETIC FIELD LIGHTS SLOPE HA]NT FOR FEB 95 SPTS PRK LANDSCAPE HAINT 2/95 PROF. SERVICES FOR DEC 94 HARD DRIVE (72 PIN) FRE I GHT TAX 2 COMPUTER COLOR HANITORS FRE l GHT TAX HENOIlY CHIP (HAND DRIVE) FRE [ GHT TAX PNT FOR TCSD INSTRUCTOR 95 DUES STARTING JAN CORPUTER TRAINING OR-SITE SERVICE FOR JAN 95 PW 96-01CS0 SERVICE FOR JAN 95 PW 94-01CSD RETENTION W/H ON ]NVIII 005 DESIGN L]EFER RD CROSSING PATCH WATER TRENCH t NICOLAS R PATCH HORK i RANCNO CA RD WAITING ON FINAL APPROVEL PROF. SERVICES DEC9~ ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-130-~-52z~ 001-1280 001-130-999-52~6 300-1990 280-199-999-52~6 001-130-~-5266 001-130-999-52~6 '190-182-999-5615 191-180-999-5~15 1~0-180-999-5615 190-181-999-5415 001-130-~-5266 192-180-999-5319 210-190-161-5802 193-180-~-5415 190-180-9~9-5615 210-190-120-5802 320-19~-9~-5221 320-199-99~-5221 320-1~9-~-5221 001-170-~-5221 001-170-~-5221 001-170-~-5221 320-199-99~-5215 320-199-~-5215 320-199-999-5215 190-183-~-5330 001-100-~-5226 320-199-9~-5250 210-190-136-5804 210-1~0-17.5-580~ 210-2035 210-166-627-5802 100-164-601-5402 100-166-601-5402 001-130-~-5267 001-130-~-5267 ITEM AMOIJt/T 3,150.00 1,692.?0 19,655.9'5 3,536.97 6,5~,.38 2,129.07 2.90 1,619.00 476.97 12,471.36 175.00 5,300.00 2,888.03 6,007.50 17,381.26 6,877.81 2,598.00 600.00 5.00 66.50 z~O.O0 5.50 35.65 1,120.00 5.00 86.80 1,689.60 5,138.00 2,700.00 1,989,22 2,476.78 646.60- 1,165.00 2,650.00 1,500.00 476.35- 2,6.~.00 PAGE 1 CHECK ANOUNT 36,311 14,760.3'5 5,300.00 2,888.03 6,007.50 24,259.07 2,598,00 2,36~.45 1 ,~8f.60 5,1::$8.00 2,700.00 4,017.60 1,165.00 3,950.00 2,157.65 VOUCHRE2 02/16/95 12:36 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER 22271 02/28/95 000267 22272 02/28/95 000354 22273 02/28/95 000406 2227~ 02/28/95 22274 02/28/95 22273 02/28/95 000302 22277 02/28/95 000302 22276 02/28/95 000929 22277 02/28/95 CITY OF TENECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PER|OOS RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF~S R(X, ILANO, GEORGE &BEVER RCY~LAND, GEORGE & BEVER SYSTEM SOURCE, INC. SYSTEM SOURCE, INC. T B PENICK & SONS, INC. 000978 TRAUMA INTERVENTZON PRO VENDOR Z TEM NAME DESCR ! PT ! OR RIVERSIDE CO. FIRE DEPT 1ST OTR 9/,/95 FIRE PROTECTION RIVERSIDE CO. HEALTH DE ANIMAL SERVICE FOR DEC 9/, NOV We BOOKING FEE TCSO RATES REFUND FY 91-9~ TC$O RATES REFUND FY 91-94 L-A HARPERS FURNITURE FOR B&S DEPT TAX RETENT]OR PAYABLE 2ND GTR AGENCY FEES TOTAL CHECKS ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-171-999-5251 001-172-999-5255 001-170-999-5273 190-180-~-5377 191-180-999-5375 001-162-999-5601 001-162-999-5601 210-2035 001-171-999-5Z74 ITEM AMOUNT 125,990.0Z, 5,707.36 9,494.40 4,150.80 28.:3.98 2,251.00 174.45 28,000 · O0 1,312.50 CHECK AMOUNT 125,990.0/, 5,707.36 9,49/,.40 4,4:3Z,.78 -. 2,425.45 28,000. O0 1,312.50 292,651.71 ITEM 4 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEYk~ FINANCE OFFI CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Genie Roberrs, Finance Officer DATE: February 28, 1995 SUBJECT: Review and Approval of the 1994-95 Mid-Year Budget PREPARED BY: Tim McDermott, Chief Accountant RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Adopt Resolution No. 95- entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 95- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET 2. Adopt Resolution No. 95- entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 95- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA REVISING THE SCHEDULE OF AUTHORIZED POSITIONS DISCUSSION: Each year the City conducts a mid-year review of its operating budget. The purpose of this review is to conduct an analysis of revenues and expenditures to ensure that the City maintains a prudent and healthy fiscal position. The Finance Department staff has performed an analysis of revenues. Additionally, all City departments have reviewed their operating budgets and have submitted year-end expenditure projections. The mid-year review includes the General Fund, Gas Tax Fund, Internal Service Funds, and certain Special Revenue Funds. Activity in each of the funds is presented in accordance with the following schedules: Schedule A - Fund Summary: Illustrates activity in terms of the current budget, year- to-date activity as of December 31, 1994, and the recommended mid-year amended budget. Schedule A presents the beginning fund balance, revenues, expenditures and operating transfers, and the projected ending fund balance based upon this activity. Schedule B - Revenue Detail: Illustrates revenue detail by source in terms of the current projections, year-to-date activity as of December 31, 1994, and the mid-year revised projections. Schedule C - Expenditure Summary: Illustrates summaries of expenditures by each department within the fund in terms of the current budget, year-to-date activity as of December 31, 1994, and the mid-year revised projections. GENERAL FUND Based upon the recommended mid-year adjustments, the General Fund fund balance at June 30, 1995 is projected to be $12,717,579 (see attached Schedule A). Projected revenues exceed projected expenditures and operating transfers out by $426,762for the 1994-95fiscal year. Although the revenue projections have been revised upward by ~1,392,136, the combination of proposed increased appropriations and previously approved adjustments to the originally adopted budget impact the projected increase in fund balance. Significant previously approved adjustments include the Parkview Site improvements (~267,000per the CIP budget), and the Interim Fire Station ($256,400). The projected General Fund revenues reflect e $1,392, 136 increase over the original budget estimate (see attached Schedule B). Significant projected revenue adjustments are as follows: Development Services - Increase in Building and Engineering revenues of $230,000and $150,240 respectively. These increases are due to an improvement in general economic conditions along with consistent housing sales and increased commercial activity in the city. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Reimbursements - $600,000 in additional estimated revenue is reflected for FEMA reimbursements approved during the year relating to the 1993 Murrieta Creek flooding. Investment Interest - An increase of $342,000 is projected in investment interest revenue. The rate of return on the City's cash and investments has been higher than projected. In addition, cash and investment balances are larger than originally anticipated. Mid-year proposed appropriations reflect a net increase in expenditures and operating transfers out of $458,384 (see attached Schedule C). Significant appropriation adjustments are as follows: Personnel Costs - Overall personnel cost savings of $101,382 have been identified. This decrease in personnel costs is attributable to salary savings from vacant positions, over-projected unemployment taxes, and the allocation .5 full time equivalent positions in the Planning Department to the Redevelopment Agency. City Council - A 84,500 increase is requested for the taping of council meetings. City Manager - A $24,764increase is requested for costs incurred in accordance with the provisions of the City Manager's contract. City Attorney- A $6,000 increase is requested for unanticipated costs relating to personnel issues. Building & Safety - A $39,800 increase is requested for contract building inspection and code enforcement due to the continued high demand for services. Disaster Relief - A $200,000 appropriation is requested for drainage and street repair costs incurred as a result of the recent heavy rains in early 1995. It is anticipated that a substantial portion of these costs will be eligible for federal and state reimbursement. Non-Departmental - A $130,000increase is required for the projected cost of the CFD 88-12 sales tax reimbursement. Operating Transfer to Gas Tax Fund - The General Fund operating transfer out to the Gas Tax Fund reflects a decrease of $225,176, primarily due to a remaining balance of Local Transportation Funds which have been used to support Public Works activities. Operating Transfer to Insurance Fund - An operating transfer of $361,994is requested to eliminate the projected accumulated operating deficit in the Insurance Fund. This deficit resulted from insurance-related costs not being fully charged to City departments over the past four years and greater claims activity than anticipated. GAS TAX FUND The projected Gas Tax Fund revenues and operating transfers in reflect an increase of $21,1 47 over the original budget estimate (see Schedule B). This increase is primarily due to increased investment interest. Mid-year proposed appropriations reflect a net increase of $10,853 (see Schedule C). A $12,500 appropriation increase is requested for a Southwest Area Planning District traffic study. This additional appropriation is partially offset by anticipated personnel cost savings. INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS Projected minor revenue increases are reflected for each Internal Service Fund, primarily in investment interest (see Schedule B). A one-time operating transfer from the General Fund is also reflected in the Insurance Fund as discussed above. 3 Mid-year proposed appropriations reflect a net increase of $36,258 for all Internal Service Funds (see Schedule C), Significant appropriation adjustments are as follows: Claims {Insurance Fund) - An increase of $50,000 is requested for anticipated litigation costs. Liability Insurance (Insurance Fund) - A decrease of $19,000 is reflected in liability insurance costs, Radio System Charges (Information Systems Fund) - An increase of $5,000 is requested for the Emergency Operations Center (EOC) base station at the Community Recreation Center. SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS Projected revenues have been increased in several Special Revenue Funds (see Schedules B). Significant revenue adjustments are as follows: Investment Interest - Projected revenues have been increased in the Development Impact Fund, AB 2766 Fund, and Measure A Fund to include estimates for investment interest, Development Impact Fees - Projected revenues have been increased by $376,518 to adjust the estimates for fire and signal mitigation fees and to include estimates for public service and library fees. AUTHORIZED POSITIONS Exhibit I illustrates the City-wide allocation of personnel. The total number of authorized positions remains unchanged. Currently there are 98.0 authorized positions. It is proposed that an additional 30% of a Senior Planner's and 20% of an Associate Planner's salary costs be charged to the Redevelopment Agency. This change is recommended because of the adoption of the AB 1290 Implementation Plan. Staff has determined that the needs of the Finance Department could best be met by reducing the classification of two currently vacant positions prior to the positions being filled. It is proposed that the Financial Services Administrator position be eliminated, and be replaced with a Senior Management Analyst position. In addition, it is proposed that the Senior Accountant position be eliminated, and be replaced with an Accountant position. These organizational changes will result in salary savings to the City, and will meet the needs of the current Finance Department structure. 4 FISCAL IMPACT: The mid-year adjusted budget projects a General Fund ending fund balance of $12,717,579 at June 30, 1995. This represents an increase of $326,762 in the fund balance during the 1994-95 fiscal year. Attachments: Resolution General Fund Schedules A through C Gas Tax Fund Schedules A through C Internal Services Funds Schedules A through C Special Revenue Funds Schedules A and B Exhibit I - Personnel Allocation By Department (City-wide) Exhibit II - Schedule of Authorized Positions 5 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET WHEREAS, each year a mid-year review is conducted of City operating budgets. WHEREAS, the purpose of this review is to conduct an analysis of revenues and expenditures to ensure that the City maintains a prudent and healthy fiscal position. WHEREAS, the mid-year review has been completed and the recommended adjustments are reflected in Schedules A through C of the City's General Fund; Gas Tax Fund; Internal Service Funds; and Special Revenue Funds. hereby hereby The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby resolve as follows: Section 1. That the Fiscal Year 1994-95 General Fund Annual Operating Budget is amended in accordance with Schedules A through C. Section 2. That the Fiscal Year 1994-95 Gas Tax Fund Annual Operating Budget is amended in accordance with Schedules A through C. Section 3. That the Fiscal Year 1994-95 Internal Service Funds Budgets are hereby amended in accordance with Schedules A through C. Section 4. That the Fiscal Year 1994-95 Special Revenue Funds Budgets are hereby amended in accordance with Schedules A through C. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOFrED this 281h day of February, 1995. A'ITF, ST: Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA) I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 28th day of February, 1995, by the following vote of the City Council: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: June S. Greek, City Clerk SCHEDULE A Revenue Expenditures Excess of Revenues Over Expenditures Operating Transfers Out Increase (decrease) in Fund Balance Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 1894 Residual Equity Transfers Est. Fund Balance, June 30, 1995 $ $ GENERAL FUND 001 FUND SUMMARY FY 94-95 AMENDED BUDGET 12,483,183 $ 11,170,824 1,312,359 (1,81 9,349) (506,990) $ 12,390,817 (100,000) 11,783,827 FY 94-95 Y'rD@ 12/31/94 6,546,035 3,988,819 2,557,21 6 (41 0,027) 2.147,189 FY 94-95 YEAR-END PROJECTION 13,875:31 g 11,492,390 2,382,r2e (1,956, 1 426.762 12,390,817 (100,000) 12,717,578 1~Feb-95 ACCT NO 4119 4285 OO1 GENERAL FUND DEPT 151 PLANNING -Plot Plan DEPT 162 BUILDING -Building Permit DEPT 163 ENGINEERING 4284 -Plan Check 4368 4mprove. lnspect. iOnsite DEFT 166 (tip 4625 -GrBnts DEPT 170 POUCE 4685 -Parking Cltadione 4060 -Mbc. Non Tile 4067 -Vehicle Impound Fees 4125 -Tempormy Outdoor Event DEPT 171 FIRE 4010 .stna~ur81 Fire Tax 4686 -Fire Plan Check 4637 -Fire Inspection DEPT 199 NON-DEPARTMENTAL   -Property Tax (Secured) -Property Tax (Secured Prior Year) ~ -Property Tax (Usecured) 4013 -BupplementeJ Tax Prior Year 4014 -Supplemental Tax 4016 -Property Transfer Tax 4018 -Franchise Fees 4620 -Transient Occupancy Tax 4624 -Sales end Us Tax 4026 -Cigarette Tax 4028 -Homeowner Property Tax Relief 4032 -Candidate Fling Fees 4045 -Off Road Ve~icle In Lieu 4048 -Motor Vehicle in Lieu 4047 -Vehicle Code Fines 4048 -AB 2768 4050 -Pay Telephone Revenue 4051 -Contdbutimls 4053 -Bids & Pr~ 4058 -Busbess LieN!sea 4057 -Promotbnel Materials 4058 -MieQelleneous 4060 -Miscellaneous Non Taxable 4051 -Returned Check Fee 4062 -RecmreW ~f Prior Yea Expense 4065 4nvatment Interest 4066 -Loan Inteest 4070 ~ Over & Shod 4075 -Rental In¢ome 4078 -Reimbursements "'~. -Community Services District -Redevelq~ment Agency ~_ ~., -Capital h,,prove.,,L~t Program TOTAL GENERAL FUND FY 94-65 BUDGET PROJECTION 170,000 1.150,000 149,880 149,680 16.300 0 16,000 0 0 28,000 48,024 1,000,631 0 40,000 0 0 150,000 740,000 480,000 5,900,000 0 0 0 0 1,113,762 66,515 0 0 0 5,000 85,750 0 0 0 0 1 233,000 4,800 0 2,000 0 162,000 75.000 456,574 12,463.163 GENERAL FUND REVENUE DETAIL BY FUND SOURCE FY 94-65 YTD~) 12/31/94 118,700 735,486 188,996 168,996 8,860 3,342 10,708 324 0 23,866 16.018 317,516 0 59,360 0 0 68,815 250,741 154,658 3,276,381 0 4,533 150 388 595,208 32.542 0 124 0 4,118 32,780 200 0 12,233 210 12,711 304,273 3,375 685 0 81 o000 37,503 0 6.546,625 FY 34-65 YEAR-END PROJECTION 18O,000 225,OOO 225,000 16,300 3,342 19,680 400 31,200 28,624 1,680,63 1 0 6O,OOO 0 0 150,000 740,000 480,000 5.900.000 0 0 150 400 1,113,763 66,515 0 300 0 6,000 100,000 200 0 210 222,598 575,000 4,800 0 2,000 0 162,000 75,000 401.740 13,875.319 VARIANCE INCREASE/ (DECREASE) 23o, ooo .. 75,120 75,120 0 8,342 3,68O 4OO 0 5,200 (20,0O0) 0 0 20,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 150 4O0 0 0 0 3O0 0 1,000 14,250 0 210 342,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 ;4,534) 15-Feb.65 SCHEDULE C PAGE 1 001 GENERAL FUND CITY COUNCIL-DEPT 100 -Personnel Services -Operating Expenditures -Operating Expenditures -Capital Expenditures Total Department 100 .:ITY MANAGER-DEPT 110 -Personnel Services -Operating Expenditures -Operating Expenditures -Capital Expenditures Total Department 110 CITY CLERK-DEPT 120 -Personnel Services -Operating Expenditures -Operating Expenditures -Capital Expenditures Total Department 120 CITY AI'rORNEY-DEPT 130 -Personnel Services -Operating Expenditures -Operating Expenditures -Capital Expenditures Total Department 130 =INANCE-DEPT 140 -Personnel Services -Operating Expenditures -OperaUng Expenditures -Capital Expenditures Total Department 140 PERSONNEL-DEFT 150 -Personnel Services -Operating Expenditures -Operating Expenditures -Capital Expenditures Total Department 150 FY 94-95 ADJUSTED APPROPRIATION 60,221 179,100 94,154 0 303,475 I 341,378 61,550 60,350 5,000 468,278 253,967 44,375 109,362 0 0 282,000 0 0 282,000 I 543,015 115,303 135,100 2,650 796,070 149,523 36,790 40,682 0 226,995 GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURE SUMMARY BY DEPARTMENT FY 94-95 MID-YEAR AMENDED BUDGET 32,254 114,653 16,038 0 60,376 165,600 54,154 0 310,130 165,554 25.598 15.087 0 227,249 I 366,142 61,550 60,350 5,000 493,042 117,391 31,523 27,340 0 176,254 246,870 48,810 109,362 0 0 127,685 0 0 127,665 0 288,000 0 0 288,000 228,925 66,395 33,774 2,623 331,717 510,158 129,525 135,100 2,650 70,212 15,657 10,171 0 149,770 38,990 40,682 0 229,442 VARIANCE INCREASE (DECREASE) 135 6,503 0 0 6,655 24,754 0 0 0 24.754 I 4,435 0 0 (2.662) 0 6,000 0 0 (32.657) 14,220 0 0 (18,337) 247 2~03 0 0 2,447 o~. 3.6% 0.6% 0.6% 7.3% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 5.3.w' -2.8% 10o6% -0.7~. 0.6% 2.1% 0.6% 0.6% 2.1% -6.1.N 12.3% 0.6% 0.0% -2.3% 1.1% 15-Feb-95 SCHEDULE C F"""'2 001 GENERAL FUND }LANNING-DEPT 161 -Personnel Services -Operating Expenditures -Operating Expenditures .capital Expenditures Total Department 161 9UILDING-DEPT 162 -Personnel Services -Operating Expenditures -Operating ExpendiNres -Capital Expenditures Total Department 162 .=NGINEERING-DEPT 163 -Personnel Services ~P--~ating Expenditures tng Expenditures ::Y,,~jdal Expenditures Total Department 163 =.W. PROJECTSrDEPT 165 -Personnel Services -Operating Expenditures -Operating Expenditures -Capital Expenditures Total Department 165 DISASTER REUEF-DEPT 166 -Personnel Servioes -Operating Expenditures -Opamting Expenditures -Capital Expenditures Total Deparlment 166 =OUCE-DEPT 170 -Personnel Services -Operating Expenditures -r"'~ting Expenditures A Expenditures Total Department 170 ADJUSTED APPROPRIATION GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURE SUMMARY BY DEPARTMENT YTO@ 12/31/94 FY C MID-YEAR AMENDED BUDGET 658,779 111,754 167,644 5,530 262,629 61,873 41,911 4,154 613,242 140,847 167,644 5,530 516,374 255,093 137,372 2,425 911,264 I 243.764 139,052 34,343 2,425 419,534 528,792 137J72 2A~ 964,083 3~,064 50,6~ 95,371 176,267 13,326 23.844 657 214,094 378,718 50,607 955,371 7000 525,396 436,574 13J99 75,082 0 525,055 I 171,045 3,662 18,770 0 1923,507 401,740 13~99 75,082 0 490,221 0 200,000 0 0 0 4,398,728 0 20,860 4,419,588 0 1,559,951 0 17,977 1,577,928 0 4,398,728 0 20,860 4.419,588 VARIANCE INCREASE (DECREASE) (45,537) 29,093 0 0 (16,444) 12,419 40,400 0 0 52,819 (15,346) 0 0 0 (18,346) 0 0 0 (34,834) 0 200.000 0 0 200,000 0 26.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2.4% 15.5 0.0% 0.0% 5.8% -4.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% -3.4.~' -8.0~. 0.0% O.0% 0.0% -6.6~/ 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% NIA 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1S-Feb-95 SCHEDULE C PAGE 3 001GENERALFUND FIRE-DEPT 171 -Personnel Services -Operating Expenditures -Operating Expenditures -Capital Expenditures Total Department 171 ANIMAL CONTROL-DEPT 172 -Personnel Services -Operating Expenditures -Operating Expenditures -Capital Expenditures Total Department 172 NON-DEPARTMENTAL-DEPT 199 -Personnel Services -Operating Expenditures -Operating Expenditures -Capital Expenditures Total Department 199 TOTAL GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT -Public Works -CIP -Insurance TOTAL GENERALFUND FY 94-95 ADJUSTED APPROPRIATION 0 775,61 6 0 85,184 0 95,000 0 0 25,771 340,0(X) 0 21,375 387,146 11,170,824 1,552,349 267,000 0 12,990,173 GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURE SUMMARY BY DEPARTMENT FY 94-95 12/31/94 FY g4-95 MID-YEAR AMENDED BUDGET 0 3,371 0 13,783 17,154 0 775,61 6 0 85,154 0 30,921 0 0 30,921 0 85,000 0 0 85,000 11,857 32 0 1,375 13,254 25,475 470, 100 0 21,375 516,950 3,958,819 11,492,3g0 388,087 21,940 0 4,395,846 1,327,173 267,000 361 ,gg4 13,448,557 VARIANCE INCREASE (DECREASE) 0 0 0 0 0 (10,000) 0 0 (10,000) I (296) 130,100 0 0 129,804 321,566 (225,176) 0 361,994 458,384 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0~. -10.5% 0.0% 0.0% -10.5% O.u~ 0.0% 33.5% -14.5% 0.0% NIA 15-Feb-95 SCHEDULE A Expenditures Excess of Revenues Over Expenditures Transfer from General Fund Transfer from Local Trans. Fund Increase (decrease) in Fund Balance Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 1994 Est. Fund Balance, June 30, 1995 GAS TAX FUND 100 FUND SUMMARY FY 94-95 AMENDED BUDGET 605,161 $ 2,167,804 (1,562,643) 1,552,349 0 (10,294) $ 0 (10,294) FY 94-95 YTD@ 12/31/94 352,000 $ 1,144,335 (792,335) 0 21 2,667 FY 94-95 YEAR-END PROJECTION 2,178:657 (1,556,001) 1,327,173 228,828 0 0 0 15-Feb-95 SCHEDULE B ACCT NO 4076 100 GAS TAX FUND 'DEPT' 164 PUBUC WORKS -Reimbursements DEPT 199 NON-DEPARTMENTAL 4062 -Recovery ~f Prior Year Expense 4065 4nvestment Interest 40e0 -Operating Transfers In (G.F.) 40gO -Operating Transfers In {LTF) 4700 .Gas Tax 2106 4701 -Gas Tax 2105 4702 -Gas Tax 2107 4764 -Gas Tax 2107.5 ITOTAL GAS TAX FUND GAS TAX FUND REVENUE DETNL BY FUND SOURCE FY 94-05 BUDGET PROJECTION 0 4,500 1,552,349 0 139,268 191,133 264,260 6,000 2,157,510 FY e4-e5 12/31/94 746 4,449 11,652 1,005,003 0 75,018 106,747 147,388 6,000 1,357,002 I FY 94.~5 YEAR-END PROJECTION 746 4,449 16,800 1,327,173 228,828 139,268 191,133 264,260 6,000 2,178,857 VARIANCE INCREASE/ (DECREASE');' 746 4,440 12,305 (225,176) 228,828 0 0 0 0 21.147 15-Febe5 SCHEDULE C 100 GAS TAX FUND PUBLIC WORKS-DEPT 164 -Personnel Services -Operating Expenditures -Operating Expenditures -Maintenance Expenditures -Capital Expenditures TOTAL GAS TAX FUND FY 94-95 ADJUSTED APPROPRIATION 669,297 214,075 139,951 1,127,581 16,900 2,167,804 GAS TAX FUND EXPENDITURE SUMMARY BY DEPARTMENT FY 94-95 12/31/94 FY 94-95 MID-YEAR AMENDED BUDGET 299,921 99,779 34,889 693,037 16,709 226,575 139,951 1,127.581 16,900 1,144,335 2, 178,657 VARIANCE INCREASE (DECREASE) 12,503 0 0 0 10,853 -0.2~'.-. 5.8.N-' 0.0% 0.0~.. 0.0~. 0.5.~. SCHEDULE A Revenue Expenditures Excess of Revenues Over Expenditures Transfers from (to) Other Funds Increase (decrease) in Retained Earnings Beginning Retained Earnings, July 1, 1994 Est. Retained Earnings, June 30, 1995 INSURANCE INTERNAL SERVICE FUND 300 FUND SUMMARY ~', FY 94-95 FY 94-95 FY 94-95 AMENDED YTD @ YEAR-END BUDGET 12/31/94 PROJECTION 256,828 $ 137,21 0 $ 265.625 350,828 170,057 377,045 (94,000) (32,947) (111,420) 0 0 0 (94,0OO) $ (32,947) (111,420) (250,574) (250.574) (344,574) (3.61,994). SCHEDULE A RovoFIi.~ Expenditures Excess of Revenues Over Expenditures Transfers from (to) Older Funds ncrease (decrease) in Retained Earnings :retained Earnings, July 1, 1994 -'_~. Retained Earnings, July 1, 1995 VEHICLES INTERNAL SERVICE FUND 310 FUND 8UMMARY FY 94-95 FY 94-95 AMENDED YTD @ BUDGET 12/31 $ 84,300 $ 43,850 82,800 19,753 1,500 24,097 0 0 1,500 $ 24,097 42,3~4 $ 43,894 FY 94-95 YEAR-END PROJECTION 87,250 4,450 4,450 42,394 46,844 SCHEDULE A Revenue Expenditures Excess of Revenues Over Expenditures Transfers from (to) Other Funds Increase (decrease) in Retained Earnings Retained Earnings, July 1, 1994 Est. Retained Earnings, JuDy 1, 1995 INFORMATION SYSTEMS INTERNAL SERVICE FUND 320 FUND SUMMARY FY 94-95 FY 94-95 AMENDED YI'D @ BUDGET 12/31/94 $ 364,872 $ 164,61 9 $ 370,640 140, 127 (5,768) 44,492 0 0 (5,768) $ 44,492 62,630 $ 56,862 FY 94-95 YEAR-END PROJECTION 367,637 379,068 (11,431 ) (11,431 ) 51 ,lgg SCHEDULE A Revenue Expenditures Excess of Revenues Over Expenditures Transfers from (to) Offier Funds Increase (decrease) in Retained Earnings Retained Earnings, July 1, 1994 iEst. Retained Earnings, July 1, 1995 SUPPORT SERVICES INTERNAL SERVICE FUND 330 FUND SUMMARY $ $ FY 94-95 AMENDED BUDGET 150,057 $ 149,557 500 0 500 $ 62,203 62,703 FY 94-95 m@ 12/31/94 77,394 95,257 (17,8S3) 0 (17,86a) FY 94-95 YEAR-END PROJECTION 153,053 151:170 15-Feb-95 SCHEDULE A Revenue Expenditures Excess of Revenues Over Expenditures Transfers from (to) Other Funds Increase (decrease) in Retained Earnings Retained Earnings, July 1, 1994 Est. Retained Earnings, July 1, 1995 FACILITIES INTERNAL SERVICE FUND 340 FUND SUMMARY FY 94-95 FY 94-95 AMENDED YTI:) @ BUDGET 12/31/94 $ 344,861 345,414 (553) 0 (553) $ 17,370 $ 16,817 172,566 144,280 28,286 0 28,286 FY 94-95 YEAR-END PROJECTION 345,111 345~414 17,370 17,067 15-Feb-95 ACCT NO INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS FUND 300 INSURANCE DEFT 199 NON-DEPARTMENTAL 4062 -Recovery of Prior Year Expense 4065 4nveBtment Interest 4076 .chmges For Sewices 4095 -Claims Recovery Subtotal Transfer from Gonered Fund ITOTAL FUND 300 FUND 310 VEHICLES DEFT 199 NON-DEPARTMENTAL 4065 4nveltment Interest 4076 -Charge For Servk:es TOTAL FUND 310 FUND 320 INFO SYSTEMS DEFT 109 NON-DEPARTMENTAL -Recovery of Prior Year Expense 4,,,~&&b,~e~4 Interest -Charges For Services TOTAL FUND 320 FUND 330 SUPPORT SERVICES DEFT 199 NON-DEPARTMENTAL 4062 -Recovery of Prior Year Expense 4065 -Investmerit Inteest 4076 -Charges For Sentlofts .... I_TOT~N-_F~DS30_ ....... FUND 340 FACIUTIES DEFT 199 NON-DEPARTMENTAL 4065 4nvestment Interest 4076 -Charges For Services TOTAL FUND 340 TOTAL ALL INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS REVENUE DETNL BY FUND SOURCE FY 94.05 BUDGET PROJECTION FY 94-05 YI'DG~ 12/31/94 FY 94-05 YEAR-END PROJECTION VAPJANCE INCREASE/ (DECREASE) 0 34 94 . 94 8,000 8.8 ,2."' "' 250,828 125,414 250,828 0 0 2,467 2,467 2.487 256,828 137,210 8,797 0 0 0 0 2,,8281 137,2~ol 265,625 I 8,797 1,500 2,450 4,450 2,050 62,800 41,400 82,800 0 84,300 43,850 87,250 2.950 0 265 265 265 0 1,918 2,500 2,500 364,872 182,436 364,872 0 364,872 164,61 g 367,637 2,765 , 0 496 488 498 500 2,120 3,000 2,500 149,557 74,778 149,557 0 . I 150,057 77,394 153,053 250 ' 344,861 345,111 1,21 8,678 o 136 344,861 172,430 344,861 172,566 1,200,91 8 615,340 2,Dee. 15.Feb.e5 SCHEDULE C INTERNAL SERVICEFUNDS INSURANCE-DEPT 199 -Personnel Services -Operating Expenditures -Capital Expenditures TOTAL INSURANCE ISF VEHICLES-DEPT 199 -Personnel Services -Operating Expenditures -Capital Expenditures VEHICLES ISF INFO SYSTEMS-DEPT 199 -Personnel Services -Operating Expenditures -Capital Expenditures TOTAL INFO SYSTEMS ISF SUPPORT SERVICES-DEPT 199 -Personnel Services -Operating Expenditures -Capital Expenditures TOTAL8UPPORTSERVICESISF FACILITIES-DEPT 199 -Personnel Services -Operating Expenditures -Capital Expenditures TOTAL FACILITIES ISF TOTAL ALL ISF INTERNAL SERVICEFUNDS EXPENDITURE SUMMARY BY DEPARTMENT FY 94-95 FY 94-95 ADJUSTED YTD {~ APPROPRIATION 12/31194 26,328 324,500 0 350,828 0 82,800 0 82,800 62,432 308,208 0 370,640 31,407 118,150 0 149,557 80,116 265,298 0 345,414 1,299,239 FY 94-95 MID-YEAR AMENDED BUDGET 12,714 157,343 0 170,057 25,345 351,200 0 377,045 0 19,753 0 0 82,800 0 19,753 29,150 110,947 0 61,250 317,808 0 379,068 140,127 14,467 80,791 0 30,020 121,150 0 151,170 37,304 108,976 0 80,264 265, 150 0 144,280 345,414 1,335,497 VARIANCE INCREASE (DECREASE) (4s3) 26,7O0 0 26,217 0 0 0 0 (1,172) 9,6O0 0 8,428 (1,387) 3,000 0 1,613 148 (148) 0 36,258 -1.8% 8.2% 0.0% 7.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% -1 3.1% -4.4% 2.5.~ 0.0% 1.1% ..0.1% 0.0% 15-Feb-95 8CHEDULEA Revenue Expenditures Excess of Revenues Over Expenditures Operating Transfers (Out) Increase (decrease) in Fund Balance Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 1994 Est. Fund Balance, June 30, 1 ~ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT 140 FUND ,SLIMMARY FY 94-95 AMENDED BUDGET 219,521 $ 10,000 209,521 (209,521) 0 $ (19,413) (19._413~ FY 94-95 o (78) 0 FY 94-95 YEAR-END PROJECTION 219,.521 10,000 209,521 (209,521) -- 0 (19,413) (19,413) 15-Feb.-95 SCHEDULE A Rivehue Expenditures Excess of Revenues Over Expenditures Transfers from (to) Other Funds Increase (decrease) in Fund Balance Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 1 ~4 'Est. Fund Balance, June 30, 1995 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FUND 120 FUND SUMMARY FY 94-95 AMENDED BUDGET 2,562,260 $ 2,562,260 (8,206,478) (5,644,218) $ 9,215.903 3,571,685 YTD@ 12/31/94 1,661,006 $ (S43,S55) 1,117,151 FY 94-95 YEAR-END PROJECTION 3,~8,R8 3,338,778 (8,206,478) (4,867,700) 9,215,903 4.348,203 15-Feb-g5 SCHEDULE A Bevenue Expenditures Excess of Revenues Over Expenditures Transfers from (to) Other Funds Increase (decrease) in Fund Balance Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 1994 Est. Fund Balance, June 30, 1995 AB 2766 FUND 150 FUND SUMMARY FY94-95 AMENDED BUDGET o $ 87,713 87,713 FY g4-95 YI'D@ 12/31/94 12,903 $ 12,g03 0 12,g03 FY 94-g5 YEAR-END PROJECTION 40,0(X) 40,000 0 .40,000 87,713 127,713 SCHEDULE A ~ ROVeRUe Expenditures Excess of Revenues Over Expenditures Transfers from (to) Other Funds Increase (decrease) in Fund Balance Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 1994 Est, Fund Balance, June 30, 1995 MEASURE A FUND 170 FUND SUMMARY FY94-95 AMENDED BUDGET 662,097 $ 1,495,1 92 2, 157,289 FY 94-95 Y'TD@ 12/31/94 308,241 $ 308,241 FY 94-95 YEAR-END PROJECTION 722,097 1,495, 192 2,217,289 1 S-Feb-95 SCHEDULE A Revenue Expenditures Excess of Revenues Over Expenditures Transfers from (to) Other Funds Increase (decrease) in Fund Balance Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 1994 Est. Fund Balance, June 30, 1995 LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUND 180 FUND SUMMARY FY 94-95 FY 94-95 FY 94-95 AMENDED YTD (~ YEAR-END BUDGET 12/31/94 PROJECTION 27,680 (27,680) 0 $ 228,828 228,828 0 (22e,e2e) (228,e2.s) 27,68O (256,5O8) (228,828) 228,828 0 1~Feb-95 ~CHEDULE B ACCT NO 4801 140 CDBG -Community Development Block Grant TOTAL CDBG COMMUNrrY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT REVENUE DETAIL BY FUND SOURCE FY 94-85 FY 94-85 FY 94-85 VARIANCE BUDGET YTD ~ YEAR-END INCREASE/ PROJECTION 12/31/34 PROJECTION (DECREASE) 219,521 219,521 219,521 219,521 15-Feb-85 8CHE~ B DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FUND REVENUE DETAIL BY FUND SOURCE ACCT NO 120 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FUND DEPT 199 NON-DEPARTMENTAL 4085 4nvestment Interest 4221 -Public FecBitics 4223 -Pl~ks/Hlbltlt 4224 -Public Service 4230 -Pie 4235 -Signal Mitigation 4237 -Ubrey 4240 -Quimby 4241 -Ynez Traffic Mitigation 4250 -Road/Median Improvements FY e4-e5 BUDGET PROJECTION 0 1,840,454 296,8~1 299,282 80,744 44,88~ FY e4-e5 YTD~) 12)31/94 238,452 758,063 141,889 163,552 223,966 69,328 43,000 8,212 FY 94-e5 YEAR-END PROJECTION 400.000 1,840.454 296,891 200,000 350,000 120,000 70,000 44.88~ VARIANCE INCREASE/ (DECREASE)' 400.000 0 0 200,000 50,718 39,258 70,000 0 15-Peb-e5 SCHEDULE B AB 2766 FUND REVENUE DETAIL BY FUND SOURCE ACCT NO 150 AB 2786 FUNF ]i~DEPT 199 NON-DEPARTMENTAL 4065 -Investment InteNt TOTAL AB 2766 FUND FY 94-e5 BUDGET FY 9445 10,657 2.246 12,903 FYe4~5 YEAR~ND 36,000 4O,O00 VARIANCE 4,000 40,000 15-Feb-e5 SCHEDULE B MEASURE A FUND REVENUE DETAIL BY FUND SOURCE ACCT NO 170 MEASURE A FUND DEPT 199 NON-DEPARTMENTAL 4065 4nvestment Interest 4725 -Measure 'A' TOTAL MEASURE A FUND FY 94-65 BUDGET PROJECTION 662,097 662,097 FY 94-65 12f31/94 39,851 268,390 308,241 FY 94-65 YEAR-END PROJECTION 722,097 VARIANCE I mlCREASE/ (DECREASe 15-Feb-65 SCHEDULE B LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUND REVENUE DETAIL BY FUND SOURCE ACCT NO 4065 4828 180 LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUND DEPT 199 NON-DEPARTMENTAL -Investment Interat -ArUcle 3 Revenues TOTAL LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUND FY 94-~5 BUDGET PROJECTION 27,680 27,680 FY 94-e5 12/31/94 FY 94-85 YEAR-END PROJECTION 27,680 27,680 VARIANCE INCREASE/ (DECREASE) 1S-Feb45 PERSONNEL A~,LOCATION BY DEPARTMENT (Full Time Equivalents listed) Authorized Proposed 199495 Chan~es Councilmemben 5.00 O.00 Department Total Deoartment: C1TY MANAGER oty 2v~nager AssisUmt City Manager Human Resources Admlni.~rator Executive Assistant Personnel Specinli~ Admini-~rative Secretary 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 2.00 0.00 ZOO 1.00 0.00 1.00 Department Total 7.00 0.00 7.00 = DeDartment: oty c~rk Deputy City Clerk Office Speclnli~ Office Assistant 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.50 0.00 1.50 2,~ 0.00 2.00 Dcpartmcnt Total 5.50 0.00 5.50 Deoartment: FINANCE Finance Officer Chief Accountant Financial Services Admini,q:mtor Senior Accountant Senior lVtnnngement Analyst Accountant Accounting Specialist Admini-~rative Secretary Accounting Assistant 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.75 (0.75) 0.00 1.00 (1.~ 0.00 0.00 0.~ 0.~ 0.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 0.00 3.00 0.~ 0.00 0.~ 2.50 0.00 2.50 w~anm~t To~ 10.00 O.oo ~ ExlUDxt J, Page 1 Recommended 1994-95 5.oo o.oo 5.oo ExlUbit Page pERSONNEL'ALLOCATION BY DF, PARTMF-NT (Full Tune F, quival~nts listed, Continued) Anthodzed Proposed 199495 Changes Department: PLANNING ~ Of planning Senior planner AssocialB planner Assistant planner planning Technician Admini.qllfive Secretary ~ Specinli~ Office Assistant Recommended 1994-95 Department Total 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.80 (0.30) 1.50 1.60 (0.20) 1.40 2.00 0.00 2.00 2.00 0,00 2.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Department: ~ (O.5m 10.90 BUH-DING AND SAI~TY 1.00 1.00 2.00 1'.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Q.O0 Chief Building Official Senior Building ~n~ctor Building InspecWr H Code Enfowement Officer Building Inspector I Building Technician Admini.~trative Secretary Office Assistant 10.00 Department Total ENGINEERING 0,30 0,35 0,30 0.45 1,00 1,05 0,90 0.85 0.85 0.50 0,25 1,20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 O.O0 Director of Public Works/City Engineer Principal Engineer Traffic ~n~ineer Permit Engineer Associate Engineer Assistant ~ngi~ee.r Senior Public Works Inspector Public Works Inspector Engineering Technician Bngin~ring Aide Admini.qa-ative Secretary Department Total 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 10.00 0,30 0,35 0.30 0.45 1.00 1.05 0.90 0.85 0.85 0,50 0.25 Exhibit I Page 3 PERSONNEL A~ J OCATION BY DEPARTMENT (Full Time Equivalents listed, Continu~) 1994-95 Chanff, s CIP ADh/IINISTRATION ~r of Public Works/City Engineer 0.30 Principal Engineer 1.00 Traffic Engineer 0.20 Associate Engineer 1.00 Assistant EnZin~*r 1.00 Senior Public Works Innpector 1.00 Public Works Inspector 1.00 Admini.~xative Secretary 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Department Total Deoartment: NON-DEPAR~AL Senior Management Analyst Non-Department ToUd De~rtment: PUBLIC WORKS Director of Public Works/City Engineer0.40 Principal Engineer 0.65 Traffic Engineer 0.50 l%4nintelHnCe Superintendent 1.00 Permit Engineer 0.55 Senior Public Works Inspector 0.10 Assistant Engineer 0.95 Public Works Inspector 0.15 Engineering Technician 0.15 Traffic Technician 1.00 Lead lVhlnte4xance Worker 2.00 Engineering Aide 0.50 Administrative Secretary 0.50 MainWnance Worker 2.00 OffiCe AsSiStnnt 1.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1994-95 0.30 1.00 0.20 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.25 0.25 0.40 0.65 0.50 1.00 0.55 0.10 0.95 0.15 0.15 1.00 2.00 0.50 0.50 ZOO 1.55 ~ DeVartment To~ ~2.00 O.00 12.00 ExtUbit I Page 4 PERSONNBI, A ,LOCATION BY DEPAKTM -NT (Full Time F. quivalcnts listed, Continued) Authorized Proposed 1994-95 Changes Deoartment: COMlVRR~ SERVICES Director of Community Services Recreation Superintendent Maint~nanc~ Superintendent Sc~tior Manngcment Analyst Landscape Inspector Recreation Supervisor Adminintrative SccI~ary Recreation Coordinator M~intcnance Worker Volunteer Coordinator Office Assisnnt Recommended 1994-95 1.~ 0.~ 1.~ 1.~ 0.~ 1.~ 0.~ 0.~ 0.85 0.~ 0.~ 0.~ 1.~ 0.~ 1.~ 2.~ 0.~ 2.~ 1.~ 0.~ 1.~ 2.~ 0.~ 2.~ 2.~ 0.~ 2.~ 1.~ 0.~ 1.~ 2.~ 0.~ 2.~ Department Total Department: Landscape Inspector 14.45 0.00 14.45 SERVICE LEVEL A 0.45 Detmrtment: Office Assistant SERV/CE LEVEL B Deoartment: SERVICE LEVEL C Management Assistant Landscape Inspector 1.00 0.55 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.55 DeparUnent Total 1.55 1.55 COmmUlfi~y Services Total Exhibk I Page 5 PERSONNEl, AI J,OCATIO BY D .PARTlV[F, NT (Full Time Equivalents listed, Continued) 1994-95 Changes INTERNAL SERVICE Deoartment: INSURANCE Financial Services Administrator Senior Management Analyst Admini.~rative Secretary 1994-95 Sub-total 0.25 (0.25) 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.00 0.50 Denartment: INFORMATION SYSTEMS Information Systems Administrator 1.00 Deoartment: SUPPORT SERVICES Administrative Technician ' i. O0 Denartment: FACH,ITIES Maintenance Superintendent lVhintenance Worker CustOdinn Sub-total Internal Service Total 0.15 1.00 1.oo 2.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.15 1.00 1.00 2.15 Deoartment: Senior Planner Associate Planner Redevelopmerit A~ency Total TOTAL AUTHOlivzE~ POSITIONS REBEV~O~ AGENCY 0,20 Q.40 0.60 pS.00 0.50 0.50 0.60 1.10 Exhibit I Page 6 PERSONN~J- ALI ~OCATION BY DEPARTMENT (Pull Tune Equivalents listed, Continued) GENERAL FUND Anthoxizl~ Proposed ,Recommended 1994-95 Cbnges 1994-95 City Council City Mana~,er City Clerk Finance planning Buff dinE and Safety Engineering l CIP Administration Non-Departmental Public Works 5.00 0.00 5.00 7.00 0.00 '7.00 5.50 0.00 5.50 10.00 0.00 10.00 11.40 (0.50) 10.90 10.00 0.00 10.00 8.00 0.00 8.00 6.00 0.00 6.00 0.40 0.00 0.40 12.00 0.00 12.00 COMMUNITY SERVICES Community Services Service Level A Service Level B Service Level C 14.45 0.00 14.45 ' 6.45 o.oo 0.45 1~00 0.00 1.00 1.55 O.OO 1.55 INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS InsuIlnce Information Services Support Services Facilities 0.50 0.OO 0.50 1.OO 0.OO 1.OO 1.OO 0.OO 1.OO 2.15 0.OO 2.15 I~EVELO~ AGENCY planning 0.60 0.50 1.10 TOTAL AUTHO1H'zEB POSITIONS 9s.oo q.oo ~ RESOLUTION NO. 95- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA REVISING THE SCI~I}ULE OF AUTHOI~IZED POSITIONS WHEREAS, pursuant to the authority under Chapter 2.08.060 of the City's Municipal Code, the City manager has the authority to hire, set salaries and adopt personnel policies; and, WHEREAS, the City Manager has recommended and the City Council now wishes to adopt the revised Schedule of Authorized Positions; The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby resolve as follows: Section 1. The attached Schedule of Authorized Positions (Exhibit II) is hereby adopted pursuant to Section 45001 of the California Government Code. Such list is attached to this Resolution and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 2. The Schedule of Authorized Positions shall become effective March 1, 1995, and may be thereafter amended. Section 3. The City Manager shall implement the attached Schedule of Authorized Positions and has the authority to select and appoint employees in accordance with the Cityis personnel policies. Section 4. All prior Resolutions in conflict with this Resolution are hereby rescinded. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 28th day of February, 1995. ATTEST: Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA) I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 28th day of February, 1995, by the following vote of the City Council: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: June S. Greek, City Clerk POSITION TITLES Accountant Accounting Assistant Accounting Specialist Administrative Secretary Administrative Technician Assistant City Manager Assistant Engineer Assistant Rannar Associate Engineer · Associate Planner Building Inspector I Building Inspector II Building Technician Chief Accountant Chief Building Official City Clerk City Manager Code Enforcement Officer Councilmember Custodian Deputy City Clerk Director of Community Services Director of Ranning Dir, of Public Works/City Engineer Engineering Aide Engineering Technician Executive Assistant Finance Officer Human Resources Administrator Information Systems Administrator Landscape Inspector Lead Maintenance Worker Maintenance Superintendent Maintenance Worker Management Assistant Office Assistant Office Specialist Permit Engineer Personnel Specialist Planning Technidan Principal Engineer Public Works Inspector Recreation Coordinator Recreation Superintendent Recreation Supervisor Senior Building Inspector Senior Management Analyst Senior Rannat Senior Public Works Inspector Traffic Engineer Traffic Technician Volunteer Coordinator TOTAL'." SCHEDULE OF AUTHORIZED POSITIONS AUTHORIZED POSITIONS MINIMUM MAXIMUM I $2,573 2.5 $1,653 3 $1,978 6 $1,928 1 $1,435 I $5,936 3 $3,139 2 $2,539 2 $3,358 2 $3,139 I $2,305 2 $2,505 2 62,258 I $3,478 1 $5,393 1 $4,487 I $2,417 5 $ 300 1 $1,573 1 $2,487 I $5,393 1 $5,393 1 $5,936 1 $1,978 I $2,167 I - $2,487 I $5,393 I $3,478 1 $3,180 2 $2,305 2 $1,984 2 $3,526 5 $1,717 I $2,417 10 $1,435 2.5 $1,498 1 $3,358 2 $1,978 2 $2,258 2 $4,181 2 $2,505 2 $1,614 I $3,431 2 $2,080 I $3,031 2 $3,180 2 $3,526 2 $3,031 1 $4,181 I $2,167 I $1,498 $3,208 $2,062 $2,467 $2,405 $1,791 $7,404 $3,913 $3,165 $4,188 $3,913 $2,874 $3,123 62,817 64,338 $6,727 $5,595 $8,914 $3,014 $ 300 $1,962 $3 101 $6 727 $6.727 $7.404 $2.467 $2.705 $3 101 $6 727 $4,338 $3,967 $2,874 $2,474 $4,399 $2,141 $3,014 $1,791 $1,867 $4,188 $2,467 $2,817 $5,215 $3 123 $2 012 $4 279 $2 592 $3.780 $3.967 $4 399 $3 780 $5,215 $2,705 $1,867 98.0 RANGE 2006 1012 1028 1026 1000 4024 2024 2004 2032 2024 1044 2002 1042 3002 4016 4000 5000 1048 6000 1008 2000 4016 4016 4024 1028 1038 2000 4016 3002 2026 1044 1030 3000 1016 1048 1000 1004 2032 1028 1042 3014 2002 1010 3000 1034 2020 2026 3004 2020 3014 1038 1004 EXEMPT/ NONEXEMPT NE NE NE NE NE E NE NE E NE NE NE NE E E E E NE E NE E E E E NE NE E E E E NE NE E NE NE NE NE E NE NE E NE NE E NE NE E E NE E NE NE R:T,.ARCHEIL'tlS'T't, AUTHPOH.LST 2/21/96 Effmetjve Febeuer/26, 1996 ITEM 5 CII~Y~AN~M~AGO~ ~ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer February 28, 1995 SUBJECT: Release Labor and Material and Monument Bonds in Tract No. 23267-1 PREPARED BY: ;-4,-Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council AUTHORIZE the release of Labor and Material Bond for Street, Water, and Sewer Improvements, end 'be Monument Bond in Tract No. 23267-1, and DIRECT the City Clerk to so notify the Developer and Surety. BACKGROUND: On October 22, 1991, the City Council entered into subdivision agreements with: The I~esley Companies 15010Avenue of Science, Suite 201 San Oiego, CA 92128 for the improvement of streets, bstallation of sewer and water systems, and subdivision monumentstion in Tract No. 232b"/-1. Original bonds were posted by The American Motorists Insurance Company. On February 9, 1993, the City Cemcil accepted substitute bonds furnished by the American Insurance Company as follows: Category Subelitute Bond No. Amount Streets 111 27 10 2791 $906,000 Water System 1112710 2791 102,500 Sewer System 11127 10 2791 111.000 Total = $1,119,500 Survey Monuments 111 4925 7167 $19,470 On August 23, 1994, the City !C. mmcil accepted the street, water and sewer improvements, authorized reduction in Faithful P~eformance bond amounts, accepted the subdivision warranty bond rider, end initiated the one.lear warranty period. -1- pwO11agdrpt~5't0228%tr232671.mlm 0215 The developer is also required to post Labor and Material bonds to ensure payment to suppliers and workers. These bonds ere maintained in effect for a period of time determined by the Subdivision Improvement Agreement after the City Council has accepted the public improvements. The contractual six-month claim period has run and no claims have been filed with the City. Therefore Staff recommends that the following Labor and Material Bond posted by the American Insurance Company be released: Bond No. 111 2710 2791 in the amount of $560,000to cover labor and materials for street, water and sewer improvements The inspection and verification process relating to the survey monumentation has been completed by the City staff, and the Department of Public Works recommends the release of the Monument Bond. Therefore it is appropriate to exonerate this bond as follows: Bond No. 111 1925 7167 in the amount of ~19,470to cover survey monumentation. The affected streets were accepted into the City maintained street system by City Council Resolution No. 94-87. The streets within the subdivision are Corte Belle Donna, Corte Carolina, and a portion of Redhawk Parkway, Via Cordoba, and Corte Zorita. FISCAL IMPACT: None. Attachments: Location Map -2- pwO1~egdrpt~95%O228~tr232671.mlm 0215 CORTE ZORITA TRA C T NO. 232 6 7-1 1" .R A C T NO ~ -:9 0 9 ~ - 6 M.B. 222/B4- 98 - r_,.oRTF, F_.AEOLI NA Location Map ITEM 6 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer February 28, 1995 SUBJECT: Release Labor and Material and Monument Bonds in Tract No. 23267-4 PREPARED BY: ,/w~lbert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council AUTHORIZE the release of Labor and Material Bond for Street, Water and Sewer improvements, and the Monument Bond in Tract No. 23267-4, and DIRECT the City Clerk to so notify the Developer and Surety. BACKGROUND: On December 10, 1991, the City Council entered into subdivision agreements with: The Presley Companies 15010 Avenue of Science, Suite 201 San Diego, CA 92128 for the improvement of streets, installation of sewer and water systems, and subdivision monumentation in Tract No. 23267-4. Original bonds were posted by the American Motorists Insurance Company. On September 14, 1993, the City Council accepted substitute bonds furnished by The American Insurance Company as follows: Ceteoorv Substitute Bond No. Amount Streets 111 2720 2809 $327,000 Water System 111 2720 2809 130,500 Sewer System 111 2720 2809 76.500 Total = $534,000 Survey Monuments 111 2716 9941 $11,650 On August 23, 1994, the City Council accepted the street, water and sewer improvements authorized reduction in Faithful Performance bond amounts, accepted the subdivision warranty bond rider, and initiated the one-year warranty period. I %agdrpt%9~O228%tr232674.rrdm 0215 The developer is also required to post Labor and Material bonds to ensure payment to suppliers and workers. These bonds are maintained in effect for a period of time determined by the Subdivision Improvement Agreement after the City Council has accepted the public improvements. The contractual six-month claim period has run and no claims have been filed with the City. Therefore Staff recommends that the following Labor and Material Bond posted by the American Insurance Company be released: Bond No. 111 2720 2808 in the amount of $266,700 to cover labor and materials for street, water and sewer improvements. The inspection and verification process relating to the survey monumentation has been completed by the City staff, and the Department of Public Works recommends the release of the Monument Bond. Therefore it is appropriate to exonerate this bond as follows: Bond No. 111 2716 9941 in the amount of $11,650to cover survey monumentation. The affected streets have been accepted into the City maintained street system by City Council Resolution No. 94-87. The streets within the subdivision are Via Poquito, and a portion of Avenida De Missions, Corte Veranos, and Calla Los Padres. FISCAL IMPACT: None Attachments: Location Map 2 ~agdrpt%95%0228%tr232674.mlm 0215 ..."I'EMECULA Location ITEM 7 APPROVAl, CITY AlTOMY TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Cound/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer February 2.8, 1995 Program Sul~lement No. 005 to the Local Agency/State Agreement for Federal-Aid Projects for the Traffic Signal at Margarita Rd. & Avenida Barca (PW93-10) PREPARED BY: ~fDon Spagndo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects Scott Harvey, Associate Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: lIESOLUTION NO. 95- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT NO. 005, TO LOCAL AGENCY/STATE AGREEMENT NO. 08-5459, BETWEEN THE STATE DEPAIITMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE CITY OF TEMECI. A FOR FEDERAL AID PROJECT NO. STPLG- 5459(005), MARGNiTA ROAD AND AVENIDA BARCA BACKGROUND: The City applied for Federal Fun~mg to construct a four-way traffic signal at the intersection of Margarita Road & Avenida 'Barca. The funds have been granted and allocated through Program Supplement No. 005 to lbe Local Agency/State Agreement for Federal-Aid Project No. 08-5459. This program supplement is subject to all the terms and conditions established by Caltrans which require that the local agerg/advertise, award, and administer the project subject to Caltrans approval. Funds for the construction of this lwoject have been allocated in the amount of $103,000and will be administered by Caltrans, District 8, -1 - pwO41r:~agdrpt~94%O228%pw93-10.eup FISCAL IMPACT: This is a Capital Improvement project and is being funded through the Federal Surface Transportation Program (STP). STP funds have been allocated in the amount of $103,000and will be administered by Caltrans, District 8. Attachments: Resolution No. 95- Supplement Agreement No. 005 -2- pwO41r:%agdrpt%94%O228%pw93-10.sup RESOLUTION NO. 9.5- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECUIA APPROVING PROGRAM SUP~ NO. 00~, TO LOCAL AGENCY/STATE AGREEMENT NO. 08-$4~9, BETWEEN THE STATE DEPAR~ OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR F~DERAL AID PROJECT NO. STPIf~5459(005), MARGARITA ROAD AND AVENIDA BARCA The City Council of the City of Temecula does resolve, determine and order as follows: WIlEREekS, before Federal-Aid will be made available for Project No. PW93-10, Traffic Signal Instalhtion at Margarita Road and Avenida Barca, the LOCAL AGENCY and STATE are required to enter into a Program Supplement Agreement. WHEREAS, Program Supplement No. 005 allocates funding in the amount of $103,000 for the construction of said traffic signal project. NOW, T!:~REFOR, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Temecula, as follows: Section 1. That the City Council appwve and authorize execution of Program Supplement Agreement No. 005 between State Depaxtrnent of Transportation and the City of Temecuh. Section 2. Authorize the Mayor to execute said Agreement Section 3. The City Clerk shall codify the adoption of this resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecuh at a regular meeting held on the 28th day of February, 1995. ATTEST: Jeffery E. Stone, Mayor June S. Greek City Clerk -1 - pwO4/r:%egdq~fi94%O228~pw93-10.eup [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss crrY OF TI~/IECULA ) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No.91{- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 28th day of l~ebruary, 1995 by the following: vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: COUNCn~MEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCIII~-MBERS: -2- pwO4/r:~d rpt~94~O228%pw93-10 .sup PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT NO. 005 Location= 08-RIV-0-TMC to Project Number: STPLG-5459 (005) LOCAL AGENCY-STATE AGREBM. F, NT E.A. Number: 08-411264 FEDERAL-AID PROJECTS NO. 08-5459 This Program Supplement is hereby incorporated into the Local Agency-State Agreement for Federal Aid which was entered into between the Local Agency and the State on 03/23/93 and is subject to all the terms and conditions thereof. This Program Supplement is adopted in accordance with Paragraph 2 of Article II of the aforementioned Master Agreement under authority of Resolution No. , approved by the Local Agency on (See copy attached). The Local Agency further stipulates that as a condition to payment of funds obligated to this project, it accepts and will comply with the covenants or remarks setforth on the following pages. PROJECT TERMINI= Margarita Road & Avenida Barca TYPE OF WORK: Traffic Signal PROJECT CLASSIFICATION OR PHASE(S) OF WORK [ ] Preliminary Engineering [ ] Right-of-Way [X] Construction Engineering [X] Construction Estimated costI Federal Funds 103000 33T $ 103000 $ 0 LENGTH: 0.1 (MILES) [ ] Matching Funds Local OTHER OTH~ 05 05 CITY OF TEMECULA By STATE OF CALIFORNIA Department of Transportation By DISTRICT DIRECTOR OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 8 Date Date Attest Title I hereby Certify upon my personat knowtedge that badgered funds are svsi tabLe for this encurbrance: Accounting Office Date /'~7'~ff $ ChapterI stetu~es I Program Iscl Fund Source 139 1994, 2660-101-890 9/.95 20.30.010.810 C 2620~0 892-F 103000.00 103000.00 Page i of 2 08 -RIV-0-TMC STPLG-5459 ( 005 ) SPECIAL COVENANTS OR REMARKS DATE: 01/27/95 1. All maintenance, involving the physical condition and the operation of the improvements, referred to in Article VI MAINTENANCE of the aforementioned Master Agreement will be performed by the Local Agency at regular intervals or as required for efficient operation of the completed improvements. 2. The Local Agency will advertise, award, and administer this project and will obtain the State~s concurrence prior to either award or rejection of the contract. 3. The Local Agency agrees the payment of Federal funds will be limited to the amounts approved by the Federal Highway Administration in the Federal-Aid Project Agreement (PR-2)/Detail Estimate, or its modification (PR-2A) or the FNM-76, and accepts any increases in Local Agency Funds as shown on the Finance or Bid Letter or its modification as prepared by the Division of Local Streets and Roads. 4. In executing this Program Supplemental Agreement, Local Agency hereby reaffirms the "Nondiscrimination Assurances" contained in the aforementioned Master Agreement for Federal-Aid Program. 5. Whenever the local agency uses a consultant on a cost plus basis, the local agency is required to submit a post audit report cover- ing the allowability of cost payments for each individual consul- tant or sub-contractor incurring over $25,000 on the project. The audit report must state the applicable cost principles utili- zed by the auditor in determining allowable costs as referenced in CFR 49, part 18, Subpart C - 22, Allowable Costs. Page 2 of 2 ITEM 8 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer February 28, 1995 Completion and Acceptance of the Ynez Road Landscape Improvements, No. PW94-04 PREPARED BY: 0~/Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects Scott Harvey, Associate Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council accept the Ynez Road Landscape Improvements, Project No. PW94-04, as complete and direct the City Clerk to: File the Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a one (1) year Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract, and Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after the filing of the Notice of Completion if no liens have been filed. BACKGROUND: On May 10, 1994, the City Council awarded a contract for the Ynez Road Landscape Improvements, Project No. PW94-O4, to Emerald Landscape Services for $188,962.00. These landscaping improvements involved several areas in the parkway on the east side of Ynez Road and in the new median islands. The work performed in the median island included the installation of cobbles set in e concrete bed, root barriers, and river washed granite boulders. Landscape plantings include roses, day lilies, mondo grass, ice plant, rosemary, crepe myrtles, torrey pines, and scarlet oaks. The decorative Ioffel retaining wall on the east side of Ynez Road, just north of Solane Way, was also planted with a colorful ground cover that will eventually cover the entire wall. On October 13, 1994 the construction of Ynez Road Landscape Improvements were completed, which began a 90 calendar day landscape maintenance period· That maintenance period has expired and the Contractor has completed ell items of work to the satisfaction of the City Engineer· The construction retention for this project will be released on or about thirty-five (35) days after the Notice of Completion has been recorded. pwO41r. ~agd~pt~95M)228~w94-04 .a~ FISCAL IMPACT: The contract amount for this project was ~188,962.00. Contract Change Orders No. 1 through 3 were approved for a total amount of $7,925.50. The total construction cost is $196,887.50. This project is a Capital Improvement Project and is being funded from the series of bonds which have been sold for Community Facilities District 88-12. Attachment: Notice of Completion Maintenance Bond Contractor's Affidavit RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND RETURN TO: CITY ClERK CITY OF TEMECULA 43174 Buekteee Peek Drive Tememab, CA 82590 IPACE NOTICE OF COMPLETION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT: 1. The City of Temecula is the owner of the property hereinafter described. 2. The full address of the City of Temecula is 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, Califomis 92590. 3. A Contract was awarded by the City of Temecula to Emerald Landscape Services to perform the following work of improvement: PIN94-04 Ynez Road Landscaping Improvements. 4. Said work was completed by said company according to plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works of the City of Tamecain and that said work was accepted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on FebmaW 28, 1995. That upon said contract the EXPLORER INSURANCE COMPANY was surety for the bond given by the said company as required by law. 5. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of Califomis, and is described as follows: PROJECT PW 94-04. 6. The street address of said property is: YNEZ ROAD FROM RANCHO CAUFORNIA ROAD TO WINCHESTER ROAD. Dated at Temecula, California, this _ day of · 1995. STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) CITY OF TEMECULA ) SS JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California and do hereby certify under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing NOTICE OF COMPLETION is true and correct, and that said NOTICE OF COMPLETION was duly and regularly ordered to be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder of Riverside by said City Council. Dated at Temecula, California, this day of · 1995. JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk Forna/CIP-O01 Roy. 12..~J~l pwO4%pw94-O4%complefn. not 021595 CM~ OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MAINTENANCE 10ND :Bond No. 131 KNOW ALL MIN IY THEBE PRBIINTI THAT: Eaerald ],Bodecape Sez'rLces - P.O. Box 63 ~lFaaa Juc]2, Ca 92652 N,4MI ANO ADDRE:~ OF CONTA4 CTOI/I 11 11 · T,,dt*rldual . hereirmfter called Principal, end F,z~lozet :Loststance Compaz~ - 10140 Campus Point Dr., Sac Diego, Ca 92121 NAME,eND ,4DDIM'$~ OF $1,RETY hereinafter called SURETY, am held and firmly bored unto CITY OF TEMECULA, hereinatter eelled OWNER, in the penal sum of _*s~z saw* I:)OLLARI end *sex sg, ov, 0Eirrl (l~8,896.20l in lawful money of the United Sate, for the payment of which sum well and truly to be made, we bind ourelves, meownora and auignl, Jointly and averally, firmly by them presents. THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION LS such that whereee, the Prindpel entered into a certa; ~ Contract with the OWNER, dlted the 10tb day ef Nay ,11 ..94 , a copy of which k hemto attached and made a pert hereof forthe conetalon of PROJECT NO. t4-04YIEZ ROAD WHIRgAS, Mid Contract provide that the INncipel will furnish · bend condltioned to guarantee for the period of aria year after approval of the final estimate on Mid job, by the OWNER, against 811 defects in workmermhip end materials which may become apparent during Mid period; end WIllREAl, the aid Contract has been ecruplated, end we epproved on F~I~~ ~ 19c~5. · NOW, THIRBFORI, THE CONDITION OF THIS OILIOATION 18 SUCH, that If within one year from the date of approval of the aid Contract, the work done under the terms of aid ConTact shaft · disclose poor workmarmhip In the execution of aid work, and the carrying Out of the terms of Mid Contract, Or it shall appear that deferde materials were furnished thereunder, then this obligation shell remain tn full force and virtue, otherwia thLs instrumem tdall be void. *EI~ THOUSAND EIGE~HBND]tED NJ_NWfZ STT&ED 20/100' MAINTINANCI BONO Iv~l Signed end mated this Z4t:b day of Yebr'uaz7 ,19 9.,._,.~5, (SoliI) 8URk'TY Explorer T,~~any Les (Name) ACt:orney in Yac~: (T'~JO) APPROVED AI TO IK)RM: $aott F. Reid, City Attomly :NCl~ld~ ~~,~~cape :T,:~,.- d.. ~j-~,..~.L.- {Name) ('rme) (Name) rr~o) Services CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of ca3_t,eoz~ta County of oraz~e On 2-1z,-95 DATE personally appeared [] personally known to me - OR - [] proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(;~ whose name(e;¢ is/mawr subscribed to the within instrument and ac- knowledged to me that he/Sr~e~eNf executed the same 'in his/rfO~f~F~Uq~r authorized capacity(ie$~ and that by signature(x) on the instrument the person~;l), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(x) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. OPTIONAL Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form, CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER [] INDIVIDUAL [] CORPORATE OFFICER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT Tn'LE(S) [] PARTNER(S) [] LIMITED [] GENERAL [] ATTORNEY-IN-FACT [] TRUSTEE(S) [] GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR [] OTHER: TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT NUMBER OF PAGES DATE OF DOCUMENT SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITY(IF.S) Explorer Insuzance Company SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE 993 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION · 8236 Remmet Ave., P.O. Box 7184 · r,,~noga Park, CA 91309-7184 Explorer Insurance Company HOME OFFICE: SAN DIEGO, CAUFORNIA Certified Copy of POWER OF ATTORNEY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the EXPLORER INSURANCE COMPANY, I Corporation duly authorized and existing under the laws ot the State of APIZONA and having its principal office in the City of San Diego, Calitomta, does hereby nominate, constitute end appoint: Les Mantle its true and lawful Attorney(s)4n-Fact, with full power and authority hereby conferred In its name, place and stead, to execute, seal, acknowledge end deliver any and all bonds, undertakings, recognizances or other wrltlen obligations In the nature thereof. This Power of Attorney is granted and is signed and sealed by facsimile under and by the authority of the following Resolution adopted by the Board of Directors of the EXPLORER INSURANCE COMPANY at a meeting duly called and held on the 22rid day of JULY, 1985, which said Resolution has not been amended or rescinded and of which the following is a true, full, and complete copy: "RESOLVED: That the President or Secretary may from time to time appoint Attorneys-In-Fact to represent and act for and on behalf of the Company, and either the President or Secretary, the Board of Directors or Executive Committee may at any time remove such Attorneys-in-Fact and revoke the Power of Altomay given him or her; and be it further RESOLVED:. That the Attorney-In-Fact may be given full power to execute for and in the name of and on behalf of the Company any and all bonds and undertakings as the business of the Company may require, and any such bonds or underlakinga exeouted by any such Attomey4n- Fact shall be as binding upon the Company as if signed by the President and sealed and attested by the Secretary.' IN WITNESS WHEREOF, EXPLORER INSURANCE COMPANY has caused its official seal to be hereunto affixed and these presents to be signed by its duly authorized officers this STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO SS: 7th day of August, 1990 EXPLORER INSURANCE COMPANY ~resident On this 7th day of Au u 1990 g S t, before the subscriber, a Notary Publ; c of the State of California, in and for the County of San Diego, duly commissioned and qualified, came Bernard Martin Feldman of EXPLORER INSURANCE COMPANY to me personally known to be the in- dividual and officer described in and who executed the preceding Instrument, and he acknowledged the execution of the same, and being by me duly sworn, deposeth and saith, that he is the said officer of the Corporation aforesaid, and that the seal affixed to the preceding instrument is the Corporate Seal of the said Corporation, and that the said Corporate Seal and his signature as such officer were duly affixed and subscribed to the said instrument by the authority and direction of the said Corporation. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my Official Seal, at the City of San Diego, the day and year first above written. STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ' e u oFFIciAL sEAL ' NORMA PORTER olsry Put~ic-CNlfomla . ...... SS: I, the undersigned, James W. Austin, III, of the EXPLORER INSURANCE COMPANY, do hereby certify that the original POWER OF AI'rOR- NEY, of which the loregoing is a full, true and correct copy, is in lull force a-d effect, and has not been revoked. IN W1T. NESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my name as Secretary, and affixed the Corporate Seal of the Corporation, this 14thday of Feb~ ~9 95 EXP CAL 37 EXPLORER INSURANCE COMPANY t~l | I UI' I[MC~ULA, PUI~LJ(,; WL)HK~ L)[I"'AHTMENT CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT AND FINAL RELEASE This is to certify that ,Tobo C. Croul , (hereinafter the * undersigned °) declares to the C~/of Temecula, under oath, that it has paid in full for all materials, supplies, labor, services, tools, equipment, end ell other bills contracted for by the undersigned or by any of the undersigned's agents, employees or subcontractors used or in contribution to the execution of its contract with the City of Temecuia with regard to the building, erection, construction, or repair of that certain work of improvement known as PROJECT NO. 94-04 YNEZ ROAD LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENT PLANS situated in the City of Temecula, State of California, more particularly described as follows: Project No, 94-04 - Ynez Road Landscape ~aprove~e~t Plan- INSERT TITLE OF WORK HERE The undersigned declares that it knows of no unpaid debts or claims arising out of Mid Contract which would constitute grounds for any third party to claim a stop notice of any unpaid sums owing to the undersigned. Further, for valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the undersigned does hereby fully release and acquit the City of Temecuia and all agents. and employees of the City, end each of them, from any and all claims, debts, demands, or causes of action which exist or might exist in favor of the undersigned by reason of the Contract executed between the undersigned and the City of Temecula or which relate in any way to the work performed by the undersigned with regard to the above-referenced construction project, Further, the undersigned expressly acknowledges its awareness of, and waives the benefits of, Section 1542 of the Civil Code of the State of California which provides: "A general release does not extend to claims which the creditor does not know or suspect to exist in his favor at the time of executing the release, which if known by him must have materially affected his settlement with the debtor.' This release is intended to be e full and general release of any and all claims which the undersigned now has or may, in the future, have against the City of Temecula and/or its agents and employees with regard to any matter arising from the construction of the above-referenced project or the Contract between the City of Temecula and the Contractor with respect thereto, whether such claims are now known or ~ d unknown or ere suspe o~nsulnected. NTRA F ' CO CTO Dated: 2-14-95 By: ~ ~ S, Print Name and Title RELEASE R-1 v C.8, LIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT .o. ~.o7 State of ca].~orn.ta County of oranse On 2-1z,-95 before me, sat7 ?. ~t~ - sota.=7 ?ub~i.c , DATE NAME, TITLE OF OFFICER - E.G.. 'JANE DOE. NOTARY PUBUC' personally appeared 3olin c. crou.1. , NAME(S) OF SIGNER(S) [] personally known to me - OR - [] proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and ac- knowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same ,in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. OPTIONAL Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form. CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER [] INDIVIDUAL [] CORPORATE OFFICER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT TITLE(S) [] PARTNER(S) [] LIMITED [] GENERAL [] ATTORNEY-IN-FACT [] TRUSTEE(S) [] GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR [] OTHER: TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT NUMBER OF PAGES DATE Of DOCUMENT SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITY(IES) Eaei~a.].~l ]-aadscape Sez'rJ.ces SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE 01993 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION · 8236 Reinmet Ave., P.O. Box 7184 * ~anoga Park, CA 91309-7184 RECORDING REQUEBTen BY AND RETURN TO:. CrrYQ.BIK crrY of TBtaECULA 43174 Buebeee Perk Dde Temeceale, CA 92~90 IPACE NOTICE OF COMPLETION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT: 1. The City of Temecula is the owner of the Ixolarty hereinafter described. 2. The full address of the City of Temecula is 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California 92590. 3. A Contract was awarded by the City of Temecula to Emerald Landscape Service to perform the following work of imlxovement: PW94-04 Ynez Road Landscaping Improvements. 4. Said work was completed by Mid company according to plane and specffications and to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works of the City of Temecula and that said work was accepted by The CiTy Council of the CiTy of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on FebmaW 28, 1995. That upon Mid contract the EXPLORER INSURANCE COMPANY was surety for the bond given by the said company as required by law. 5. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, and is described as follows: PROJECT PW 944)4. 6. The street address of said property is: YNEZ ROAD PROM RANCHO CAUFORNIA ROAD TO WINCHESTER ROAD. Dated at Temecula, Califomia, this _ day of · 1995. JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) CITY OF TEMECULA ) as I, June S. Greek, C. jty Clerk of the City of Temecula, Califomis and do hereby certify under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing NOTICE OF COMPLETION is true and correct, and that Mid NOTICE OF COMPLETION was duly and regularly ordered to be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder of Riverside by Mid City Coundl. Dated at Temecula, Colifomia, this day of ·1995. JUNE S. GREEK, City Clerk l:~'mdCIP-4)01Rev. 12-f,-91 pwO4%pw94-O4~m~letn.not 021595 CIT~ OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Bond No. 131 11 11 KNOW ALL MEI IV THEIE FltglINTI THAT: " Fan=add/andscape SezTlce8 - P.O, 8oz 63 ],aFme ]~scb, Ca 92652 NAM/,4ND ADDRE:~ OF CONTRACTOR e znaiviauat . hereirmfter called Principal, and ]Cxplore:~ T-euraalce Compass7 - 10140 Callms :~o~nt DEc, Seas D~e~o, Ca 92Z21 NAME AND ,A~ OF SURETY heroinafter called SURE'r% Ire held end firmly bmald unto CITY OF TEMECULA, hemlnafter eelled OWNER, in the penal sum of *SRX SglJ)e* DOt/jUtS I~ *SRX. SalVIa* Gglrll (Is, 896.2q trl lawful money of the United Suitel, for the peyrrleflt of whil~l Ilall well end truly tO be made, we bind ourselves, successors end aledana, joimiy end eeverelly, firmly by them preeenta. THE CONDITION OF THIS 01LIGATION Is such that v.h,,se, the larirmtpal entead into e cartab Contract with the OWNER, dated the 10th day el Nay ,11.94 , a copy of which is hereto etachad end made a pert hereof forthe conetruqdon of PROJECT NO. 9444 YNEZ ROAD WHIRgAB, Mid Contact providel thee the Prtncllal will fumlah · bond eorglitjonecf to guarantee for the padod of one year after approval of the final eatimam on said job, by the OWNER, against all defects in workmanship end matedab which my beDcaw apparent dudn0 said pedod; and WHIREAI, the e~ld Contact hew been completed, and wee approve on Feivu~r~ ct NOW, THIREFORI, THE CONDITION OF THll OIUOATION 18 IUCH, that if within one War from the deui of al~rovel of the setd Contreat, the work done urder the terme of Mid Contreat chill · diN:loll Door w0rkmeruhip in the exeoution of Mid work, 81xI the carryIno out of the tern of ,aid Contract, ~ it shall appear thee dolecalve metedale were fumeabed thereunder, then this obligeion · hell remain in full foroe end virtue, otherwlee thb irmrument ehell be void. *RI~ TBOUSAND EI{~rr HUNDRED NINWL'I SIX A]]D 20/100' MAImINAI~I 10140 Id-1 Signed 8hd seem fide Z~th dey of February (Soil) 8UJ~TV Explorer Imm~mrf Les P-ntZe (NilTie) A~torney in Face fTjtJl) S~Ott F:. I~leid, City Anomey (Name) mum} CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of County of o=ange On 2-14-95 DATE personally appeared before me, Nat7 ~, )!attJ4po~ - liotac7 :eub::Ltc . NAME, TITLE OF OFFICER - E.G., 'JANE DOE, NOTARY PUeUC' T-eS !~ntle NAME(S) OF SIGNER(S) [] personally known to me - OR - [] proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(31~ whose name(B) isj~a~z subscribed to the within instrument and ac- knowledged to me that he/eaeFe~ executed the same in his/r.=3~'/~l~ authorized capacityOmaJci and that by signature(=) on the instrument the personal), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. OPTIONAL Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form. CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER [] INDIVIDUAL [] CORPORATE OFFICER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT TITLE(S) [] PARTHER(S) [] UMITED [] GENERAL [] ATTORNEY-IN-FACT [] TRUSTEE(S) [] GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR [] OTHER: TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT NUMBER OF PAGES DATE OF DOCUMENT SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTffY(IES) Ex"pZorer 'rnsurance Cospansy SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE {)1993 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION, 8236 Rammet Ave., P.O. Box 7184, Canoga PAW,, CA 91309-7184 Explorer Insurance Company HOME OFF1CE: SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA Certified Copy of POWER OF ATTORNEY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the EXPLORER INSURANCE COMPANY, a CorporaUon duly authorized and existing underthe,, laws of the State of ARIZONA end having its principal office in the City of San Diego. California. does hereby nominate. constitute and appoint: Les Mantle its true and lawful Attorney(s)4n-Fact, with full power and authority hereby conferred In its name. place end stead. to execute. cast, acknowledge and deliver any end all bonds. undertakings. recognizances or other written obligations In the nature thereof. This Power of Attorney is granted and is signed and sealed by facsimile under and by the authority of the following Resolution adopted by the Board of Directors of the EXPLORER INSURANCE COMPANY st · meeting duly called and held on the 22rid day of JULY. 1985. which Mid Resolution his not been amended of rescinded and of which the following is s b'ue, full, and complete copy: 'RESOLVED: That the President of Secretsty may from time to time appoint Attofneys-in-Fact to represent and act tor and on behalf ofthe Company, and either the President of Secretst,/, the Board of Directors or Executive Committee may at any time remove luch Attomeys4n-Fact and revoke the Power of Attorney given him or her; and be It further RESOLVED: That the Attorney-in-Fact may be given full power to execute for and in the name of end on behalf of the C~mpany any end ell bonds and undertakings as the business of the Company may require, and any such bonds or unclerteklnga executed by any much Attorney-In- Fact shall be as binding upon the Company as if signed by the Resident and sealed and attested by the Secretary." IN WiTNESS'WHEREOF, EXPLORER INSURANCE COMPANY has caused its official seal to be hereunto affixed and these presents to be signed by its duly authorized officers this 7th day of August, 1990 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO EXPLORER INSURANCE COMPANY 1990 A g s t, before the subscriber. a Notary Pub, c of the State of CalifOrnia. in and for the County of Sen Diego, Onthis 7th day of u u duly commissioned and qualified, came Bomard Martin Feldman of EXPLORER INSURANCE COMPANY to me personally known to be the in- dividual and officer described in and who executed the preceding Instrument, and he acknowledged the execution of the same. and being by me duly sworn, deposeth and saith, that he is the said officer of the Corporation aforesaid, and that the seal affixed to the preceding instrument is the Corporate Seal of the said Cofporation, and that the said Corporate Seal and his signature is such officor were duly affixed and subscribed to the said Instrument by the authority and direction of the said Corporation. IN WiTNESS WHEREOF, I hav_e_h_er_eu_n~ se_t _my h_a_nd a_nd_ aff!xe_d my Official Seal, st the City of Sen Diego, the day and year first above written. STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO OFFICIAL SEAL NORMA PORTER Notary Pubitc-Cellfoml8 SAN DIEGO COUNTY My Comm. ExC. Jan. 8. 1992 SS: I, the undersigned, James W. Austin, ill, of the EXPLORER INSURANCE COMPANY, do hereby certify that the original POWER OF All'OR- NEY, of which the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy. is in full force a-d effect. and has not been revoked. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my name is Secretary, and affixed the Corporate Seal of the Corporation, this 14thday of February 19 95 EXPLORER INSURANCE C~.MPANY EX~ CAL 37 ~11 I Ut' |~,M*'L;ULA, PUI=ILIL; WL)PII~ L)I~IJAR'TMENT CONTRACTORS AFFIDAVIT AND RNAL RELEASE Thisistocertifythst Joim C. Czo.~ ,(hereinafterthe "undersigned*) declare to the City of Temecula, under oath, that it has paid in full for all materials, supplies, labor, services, tools, equipment, end ell other bills contracted for by the undersigned or by shy, of the undersigned's agents, employees or subcontractors used or in contribution to the execution of its contract with the City of Temecula with regard to the building, erection, construction, or repair of that certain work of improvement known as PROJECT NO. 94-04 YNEZ ROAD LANDSCAPE IMPROVEVIENT PLANS situated in the City of Temecula, State of California, more particularly described as follows: Project lio. 94~0~ - Ynez Road Landscape Improvement PI=n- INSERT TITLE OF WORK HERE The undersigned declares that it knows of no unpaid debts or claims arising out of said Contract which would constitute grounds for any third party to claim a stop notice of any unpaid sums owing to the undersigned. Further, for valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the undersigned does hereby fully release and acquit the City of Temecula and all agents: and employees of the City, end each of them, from any end all claims, debts, demands, or causes of action which exist or might exist in favor of the undersigned by reason of the Contract executed between the undersigned and the City of Temecuis or which relate in any way to the work performed by the undersigned with regard to the above-referenced construction project. Further, the undersigned expressly acknowledges its awareness of, and waives the benefits of, Section 1542 of the Civil Code of the State of Califomia which provides: 'A general release does not extend to claims which the creditor does not know or suspect to exist in his favor st the time of executing the release, which if known by him must have materially affected his settlement with the debtor.' This release is intended to be a full and general release of any and all claims which the undersigned now has or may, in the future, have against the City of Temecula and/or its agents and employees with regard to any matter arising from the construction of the above-referenced project or the Contract between the City of Temecula and the Contractor with respect thereto, whether such claims are now known or ~ ~;) unknown or 8re suspe or nsulr}ected. CONTHAGt'OF/R: Dated: 2-14-95 S Print Name end T'~le RELEASE I~.1 CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT .o..o7 State of Cal~foZZLta County of (:)z',,-,Se On 2-14-95 DATE personally appeared before me, 3obo c. ct-oul NAME, TTTLE OF OFFICER - E,G., 'JANE DOE, NOTARY PUBUC' NAME(S) OF SIGNER(S) MyCornre. t934597 [] personally known to me - OR - [] proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and ac- knowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. OPTIONAL Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form. CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER [] INDIVIDUAL [] CORPORATE OFFICER Tm~(S~ [] PARTNER(S) [] LIMITED [] GENERAL [] A'I'rORNEY-IN-FACT [] TRUSTEE(S) [] GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR [] OTHER: SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTTTY(ES) beeza],4 ~mdsc~pe Sez'vJ. ces DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT NUMBER OF PAGES DATE OF DOCUMENT SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE 01993 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION · 8236 Itemmet Ave., P.O. Box 7184 ,, Canoga Park, CA 91309-7184 ITEM 9 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer February 28, 1995 Focused Model Development (Traffic - SWAPD) RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council: Approve the four (4) party agreement - Cities of Temecula, Murrieta, Western Riverside Council of Governments, and Hank Mohle and Associates Agreement for Professional Services, Southwest Area Planning District (SWAPD) Traffic Study - Focused Model Development. 2. Authorize the Mayor or his designated representative to sign the agreement. Award of contract is subject to approval of Mid-Year Budget request of $12,500 for that purpose· BACKGROUND: The Cities of Temecula and Murrieta recently received a grant for $100,000for the I-15/I-215 Corridor Planning. That study will address the problems on the local street system in the proximity of the two (2) Interstate Highways. In order to have adequate input into the sources and potential solutions to the existing corridor problems, much larger area must be considered. This area, for study purposes, is Southwest Area Planning District (SWAPD). The area includes the Cities of Temecula, Murrieta, Lake Elsinore and Canyon Lake, as well as portions of unincorporated areas of Riverside County. The primary objective of this study is to determine the impact of projected traffic volumes within this area on the overall system to include I-15/I-21 5 Corridor. Therefore, much of the information of the SWAPD Focused Model Development will be utilized for the I-15/I-215 Corridor Study. SWAPD Focused Model will extensively address the traffic issues in the areas of Temecula and Murrieta as well as the immediately adjacent county area. Existing information will be utilized from the Cities of Lake Elsinore and Canyon Lake and superimposed on the SWAPD model for this immediate area to determine the impacts, if any, of the traffic in those two (2) cities on the areas of Temecula and Murrieta. I r:%g5%O228%swepd.agnlejp The participating agencies for this study and the obligation of each is as follows. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Western Riverside Council of Governments City of Temecula City of Murrieta SCAG - Provides Information City of Lake Elsinore - Provides Traffic Information City of Canyon Lake - Provides Traffic Information $25,000 $12,500 $12,500 It should be pointed out that there is a good possibility that our portion of the cost may be funded by STP. Request for these funds ($12,500)has been submitted. FISCAL IMPACT: The maximum costs to the City of Temecula is $12,500· This is subject to the approval of · the Mid-Year Budget request for funds to be transferred from access revenues to Account No. 100-164-602-5248for the purpose of this study. Potentially, there will be no cost to the City, if STP funding request is approved. Attachment: Southwest Area Planning District Focused Model Development; Agreement for Professional Services 2 r:%95%O228%ewepd .agnlajp AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SOUTHWEST AREA PLANNING DISTRICT (SWAPD) FOCUSED MODEL DEVELOPMENT The WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS (WRCOG), CITY OF MURRIETA, CITY OF TEMECULA, and HANK MOHLE AND ASSOCIATES, effective 1995, do hereby mutually agree as follows: I. PARTIES: The parties to this agreement are WRCOG, the CITY OF MURRIETA, and the CITY OF TEMECULA (hereinafter collectively referred to as "AGENCIES"), and HANK MOHLE AND ASSOCIATES, an engineering consultant firm acting as an independent contractor corporation (hereinafter referred to as "CONSULTANT"). OBLIGATIONS OF CONSULTANT: AGENCIES, pursuant to this agreement, hereby contract with CONSULTANT to act on their behalf directly and indirectly and in conjunction with AGENCIES' staff in providing the tasks as contained in the Scope of Work attached hereto as Exhibit A. CONSULTANT shall be responsible for tasks designated "HMA" under Lead Agency. The scope of services to be provided by CONSULTANT apply only to the area contained within the area referred to as the "Southwest Area Planning District," as shown on the map attached hereto as Exhibit B. ADMINISTRATION OF CONSULTING CONTRACT: AGENCIES hereby appoint the Executive Director of WRCOG (hereinafter referred to as Executive Director), or his designee or designees, in the application of AGENCIES' rights hereunder, and as AGENCIES' representative(s) in the review and administration of the work performed by CONSULTANT pursuant to the terms of CONSULTANT's Scope of Work. CONSULTANT and Executive Director, or his designee(s), shall meet as necessary for the purpose of discussing the project. PROJECT SCHEDULE AND SUBMITTAL DATES: CONSULTANT shall perform the designated "HMA" tasks contained in the Scope of. Work in accordance with the schedule included with the Scope of Work attached hereto as Exhibit A. , TERM: This agreement shall become effective upon execution as authorized by the Executive Director and by the Directors of Public Works for both cities, or their designees as noted above, and shall terminate, if not terminated pursuant to the provisions contained hereinbelow, or otherwise extended by all parties, , 1995. COMPENSATION: CONSULTANT shall submit monthly invoices to the Assistant Director of WRCOG, which shall be due and payable within thirty (30) days. The hourly rates for services shall be as shown in Exhibit "C" attached to this contract and herein incorporated by.. reference. Notwithstanding the above payment schedule, all monies shall be due, except as provided for hereinbelow with respect to cancellation at the convenience of AGENCIES or for reasons of nonl~.rformance. The total amount payable to CONSULTANT for services pursuant to this agreement shall not exceed fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00). It is understood the cities of Murrieta and Temecula are each responsible for reimbursi.ng WRCOG the amount of twelve thousand five hundred dollars ($12,500.00) from each city in order to provide fifty percent (50%) funding for the CONSULTANT services. WRCOG shall invoice each city within thirty (30) days of the effective date of this agreement for twelve thousand five hundred dollars ($12,500.00). Each city shall reimburse WRCOG within thirty (30) days of the receipt of the WRCOG invoice. INTEREST OF CONSULTANT: CONSULTANT may not conduct business for third parties that may be in conflict with CONSULTANT's responsibilities under this contract. CONSULTANT may not solicit any business during the term of this contract that conflicts with his or her responsibilities under the contract. HOLD HARMLESS: CONSULTANT agrees to save, indemnify, hold harmless, and defend (with attorneys approved by AGENCIES) AGENCIES, their officers, agents, employees, and independent contractors from and against all liability, claims, costs, and expenses (including, without limitation, attorney's fees) arising from loss of or damage to any property whatsoever or injury to or death of any person whomsoever caused or occasioned by the negligent or wrongful act or omission of CONSULTANT or any agent or employee of CONSULTANT, arising out of or in connection with this agreement or !malnsdsaane~laXttmm0194 .~f 2 10. ll. the work to be performed by CONSULTANT hereunder. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT FOR CAUSE: If, through any cause, CONSULTANT shall fail to fulfill in a timely and proper manner his obligations under this agreement, or if CONSULTANT shall violate any of the covenants, agreements, or stipulations of this agreement, AGENCIES shall have the fight to terminate this agreement by giving written notice to CONSULTANT of such termination and specifying the effective date thereof. In that event, all finished or unfinished documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, reports, and other materials as stated hereinbelow prepared by CONSULTANT shall, at the option of AGENCIES, become the property of AGENCIES, and CONSULTANT shall be entitled to receive compensation in accordance with this contract for any work satisfactorily completed on such documents and other materials up to the effective date of notice of termination, not to exceed the amounts payable hereinabove, less any appropriate offset. TERMINATION FOR CONVENIENCE OF AGENCIES: AGENCIES may terminate this agreement at any time and without cause by giving written notice to CONSULTANT of such termination at least fifteen (15) days before the effective date of such termination. In that event, all finished and unfinished documents and other .materials described hereinbelow shall, at the option of AGENCIES, become AGENCIES' sole and exclusive property. If the agreement is terminated by AGENCIES as provided in this paragraph, CONSULTANT shall be entitled to receive compensation in accordance with this contract for any work completed on such documents and other materials to the effective date of such termination. CONSULTANT hereby expressly waives any and all claims for damages or compensation arising under this agreement except as set forth hereinabove in the event of such termination. ASSIGNABILITY: CONSULTANT shall not assign or subcontract any interest in this agreement, shall not transfer any interest in the same (whether by assignment or novation), and shall not delegate any performance hereunder (including hiring or retaining use of any other person or entity for any purpose) without prior written consent of AGENCIES, provided, however, that claims for money due or to become due to CONSULTANT from AGENCIES under this agreement may be assigned to a bank, trust company, or other financial institution without such approval. Notice of such assignment or transfer shall be furnished promptly to AGENCIES. Any assignment requiring approval may not be further assigned without AGENCIES approval. 12. 13. 14. 15. OWNERSHIP. PUBLICATION. REPRODUCTION. AND USE OF MATERIAL: All reports, studies, information, data, statistics, forms, designs, plans, procedures, systems, and any other materials or properties produced under this agreement shall be the sole and exclusive property of AGENCIES. No such materials or properties produced in whole or in part under this agreement shall be subject to private use, copyrights, or patent right by CONSULTANT in the United States or in any other country without the express written consent of AGENCIES. AGENCIES shall have unrestricted authority to publish, disclose (as may be limited by the provisions of the Public Records Act), distribute, and otherwise use, copyright, or patent, in whole or in part, any such reports, studies, data, statistics, forms, or other materials or properties produced under this agreement. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR: AGENCIES are interested only in the results obtained, and CONSULTANT shall perform as an independent contractor with sole control of the manner and means of performing the services required under this agreement. AGENCIES maintain the right only to reject or accept CONSULTANT's final work product as each phase of this agreement is completed. CONSULTANT and any of CONSULTANT's agents, employees, or representatives are, for all purposes under this agreement, an independent contractor, and shall not be deemed to be an employee of AGENCIES, and none of them shall be entitled to any benefits to which AGENCIES' employees are entitled, including, but not limited to, overtime, retirement benefits, worker's compensation benefits, injury leave, or other leave benefits. CHANGES: AGENCIES may from time to time require changes in the scope of the services by CONSULTANT to be performed under this agreement. Such changes, including any increase or decrease in the amount of CONSULTANT's compensation, that are mutually agreed upon by AGENCIES and CONSULTANT shall be effective as amendments to this agreement only when in writing, and no amendments shall increase the total amount payable by more than ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00) without approval of the two City Councils. GENERAL CONDITIONS CONSULTANT shall provide no services for any private client within the corporate boundaries or sphere of influence of AGENCIF-_,S during the period of this agreement that may constitute a conflict of interest. CONSULTANT shall be bound by the requirements of the FPPC (and State law) with regard to B, Cm disclosure of financial interests and prohibited conflicts of interest. AGENCIES shall not be called upon to assume and CONSULTANT shall save, defend, indemnify, and hold harmless AGENCIES against any liability or claim for the direct payment of any salary, wage, or other compensation to any person employed by CONSULTANT performing services hereunder for AGENCIES or for any employee-related claims, including, but not limited to, worker's compensation claims. The parties understand and agree that CONSULTANT is acting strictly as an independent contractor under the terms of this agreement, and this agreement is not intended to establish an employer-employee relationship between AGENCIES, on the one hand, and CONSULTANT or any of its employees, on the other hand. If and when permitted hereunder, all officers, agents, employees, subcontractors, their agents, officers, and employees who are hired by or engaged by CONSULTANT in the performance of this agreement shall be deemed off'leers, agents, employees, and subcontractors of CONSULTANT, and AGENCIES shall not be liable or responsible to such personnel for anything whatsoever. CONSULTANT agrees to indemnify, save, keep, and hold harmless AGENCIES and all of their officers and employees from all damages, costs, or expenses tn law and equity including, but not limited to, costs of suit and attorney's fees and expenses for legal services that may at any time arise or be set up because of damage to property or injury to persons received or suffered by reason of any negligent or other actionable act or omission on the part of CONSULTANT or any its agents, officers, employees, and subcontractors in the performance of this agreement. Payment to CONSULTANT of compensation hereunder shall not be deemed to waive AGENCIES' fights or CONSULTANT's obligations hereunder. CONSULTANT agrees to and shall at its own cost and expense procure and maintain during the term of this agreement general liability insurance in an amount of not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) per occurrence and annual aggregate. Such insurance shall be procured from an insurer authorized to do business in California. AGENCIES shall be named as additional insureds, and the insurance required hereunder' shall be primary and not contributing with any other insurance available to or obtained by AGENCIES. In addition, CONSULTANT shall obtain Worker's Compensation Insurance covering all of its employees (where such employment or retention is approved by AGENCIES hereunder) as required by law. CONSULTANT shall obtain professional liability insurance in the amount of one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) per occurrence and annual aggregate. CONSULTANT shall provide AGENCIES with satisfactory evidence that such insurance has been paid. Certificates of Insurance shall be filed with AGENCIES and shall contain provisions that AGENCIES will be given p~31x3td~meculaXdm~Oi94.wpr 5 E, H, thirty (30) days' written notice in advance of cancellation of any policy of insurance. In the event any action is brought by either party to construe this agreement or enforce any of its terms, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its reasonable attorney's fees and costs incurred, whether or not the matter proceeds to judgment. Upon termination of this agreement as provided hereinabove, CONSULTANT shall, within such reasonable period as may be directed by the Executive Director, complete those items of work that are in various stages of completion and that the Executive Director determines are necessary to be completed by.. CONSULTANT to allow the project to be completed in a timely, logical, and orderly manner. Upon termination, all finished or unfinished documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, models, photographs, reports, and other material prepared by CONSULTANT under this agreement shall be delivered to the Executive Director upon request, as property of AGENCIES. The rights and remedies of AGENCIES provided in this agreement are not intended to be exclusive, and are in addition to any other rights and remedies permitted by law. CONSULTANT does not currently anticipate using subcontractors other than as stated in Exhibit A for performance of its services under this agreement. In the event subcontractors are anticipated in the future, CONSULTANT shall first obtain the prior written consent of AGENCIES through the Executive Director. CONSULTANT has provided a listing of personnel in the attached Exhibit A. These personnel shall not be removed or replaced without the prior written concurrence of AGENCIES through the Executive Director. In performing all services hereunder, CONSULTANT shall comply with all applicable laws and regulations of AGENCIES and/or all other relevant government agencies. Also, CONSULTANT certifies and agrees that all persons employed by CONSULTANT, its affiliates, subsidiaries, and related entities, if any, will be treated equally by CONSULTANT, without unlawful discrimination based upon creed, sex, race, or national origin. If AGENCIES find that any of the provisions of this paragraph have been violated, such violation shall constitute a material breach of this agreement upon which AGENCIES may determine to cancel, terminate, or suspend the agreement. While AGENCIES reserve the right to determine independently that the antidiscrimination provisions of the agreement have been violated, in addition, a determination by the California Fair Employment Practices Commission, or successor agency, or the Federal Equal !malmsal'dnn~.ula~dmm0194.,tpf 6 L, Employment Opportunity Commission, or successor agency, that CONSULTANT has violated State or Federal antidiscrimination laws relative to this agreement shall constitute a finding by AGENCIES that CONSULTANT has violated the antidiscrimination provisions of this agreement. Notices or correspondence relating to this agreement shall be in writing. Any notices to be given hereunder shall be effective when personally delivered, or two (2) days after placing in the United States Mail by certified mail, postage prepaid, and addressed to the party to whom the notice is directed. The current addresses of the parties are as follows: AGENCIES Assistant Director Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG) 3737 Main Street, Suite 420 Riverside, CA 92501 CONSULTANT R. Henry Mohle Hank Mohle & Associates 901 East Imperial Highway, Suite A LaHabra, CA 90631 Work to be performed by CONSULTANT hereunder shall commence immediately, and upon commencement of such work, CONSULTANT's right to compensation therefor shall thereupon accrue. CONSULTANT agrees that AGENCIES or any of their duly authorized representatives shall at any reasonable time during regular business hours have access to and the right to examine, audit, excerpt, copy, or transcribe any pertinent transaction, activity, time and work records, employment records, or other records relating to this agreement. Such material, including all pertinent cost accounting, financial records, and proprietary data, must be kept and maintained by CONSULTANT for a period of at least four (4) years or for the period required by law, whichever is greater, after completion of CONSULTANT' s performance hereunder, unless AGENCIES' written permission is given to dispose of same prior to that time. Except as otherwise provided by law, all reports, communications, documents, and information obtained or prepared by CONSULTANT in connection with its work hereunder, shall not be published without prior consent of the Executive Director, nor shall CONSULTANT issue any news releases or publish information relating to its work hereunder without the prior consent of the Executive Dii'ector. p~uhXdmmO194.wpf 7 Oe Qe The invalidity in whole or in part of any provision hereof shall not void or affect the validity of any other provision. No waiver or breach of any provision hereof by either party shall constitute a waiver of any other or future breach. Failure of either party to enforce any provision hereof at any time or from time to time shall not be construed as a waiver thereof. This agreement is intended to be binding on the parties, and their respective successors and assigns. The plural shall include the singular, and the singular shall include the plural and neuter wherever the context so requires. CONSULTANT will perform the services set out in this agreement, as contemplated herein, in an efficient, timely, and professional manner and in accordance with generally accepted standards for performing similar services. It is understood that the AGENCIES, in entering into this agreement, are relying on CONSULTANT's representations for quality and professional work performed in a timely manner, and CONSULTANT shall perform in accordance with those representations and standards. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have accepted, made, and executed this agreement upon the terms, conditions, and provisions above stated. CONSULTANT: Hank Mohle & Associates By: R. Henry Mohle President AGENCIES: City of Murrieta Western Riverside Council of Governments By: By: Ben Minamide Director of Public Works/City Engineer A.J. Wilson Executive Director pralxsuBtemcc uh~rhmoO 194 .wpf 8 City of Temecula By: Ronald E. Bradley City Manager ProPq:sul~temccuh\rlsm°O194-wPj~ 0 SW APD FOCUSED MODEL SCOPE OF WORK 1.0 TAZ DEVELOPMENT 1,1 Realign Local TAZ's with Census Geography EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF WORK 1.2 Develop Correspondence Tables SW APD FOCUSED MODEL SCHEDULE I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX X 1.1,1 Adjust Local TAZ's to Census Block Boundaries XXX 1.1.2 Adjust Local TAZ's to reflect 1990 and General Plan land use XX X 1.1.3 Provide maps for SCAG and local agency review XX 1.1.4 Design centroid and centroid connector system XXX 1.1.5 Provide WRCOG with TAZ Map in .dxf format for conversion X XXXX X 1.2.1 Use Polygon Overlay on Block ID's to generate Table 1.2.2 Aggregate 1990 block data to TAZ's 1.2.3 Add Geocoded data for 1990 o 1994 derived from permit data XX XX X LEAD AGENCY RESP. POSITION HMA EJN WRCOGISCAG JWISB/-SS 2.0 NETWORK DEVELOPMENT 2, 1 Road Network - Focused Area 2.1,1 Obtain Centerline coverage from Riverside Co. I SCAG 2.1.2 Clip Coverage to SW APD 2.1.3 Select arcs for Model Network 2.1.4 Delete unnecessary arcs / nodes 2.1,5 Add Centroid and Zone Connectors 2.1.6 Edit CTP network near SW APD Boundary to match focus area 2.1.7 Create Check Plots I ArcView views for Review 2.1.8 Edit final network and convert to TranPlan 2.2 Road Network - Outside Focused Area 2.2.1 Generalize Zones outside focus area XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXX X X XX X XX XX X XXX XXXXXXXXXXXX SCAG Page I SW APD FOCUSED MODEL SCOPE OF WORK 2,2.2 Drop all zone connectors, primary/secondary roads from LA,OR,VEN 2.2.3 Add back new zone connectors to LA, ORA, VEN 2.2.4 Combine networks and check in TranPlan 2.2.5 Create Plots and ArcView views for review 2.2.6 Edit network and test in TranPlan 2.3 Transit Network o Outside Focused Area 2.3.1 Create transit network outside focus area 2.3.2 Add transit zone connectors - walk and Park-and-ride connectors 24 Transit Network - Focused Area ,,~-.,, ,.2 Obtain transit networks from local ,~perators I TransStar (RTA/CTS) 2.4.3 Create focus area transit routes in Arc/Info and TranPlan 2.4.4 Add transit zone connectors - walk and Park-and-ride connectors 2.4.5 Merge and edit outside area and focused area 2.4.5 Circulate maps / views for local review 2.4.6 Make final edits 3.0 Network Attributes 3.1 Link Attributes 3.1.1 Create Maps/TableslArcView II Views of focused Network 3.1.2 At Workshop in Southwest APD distribute data and train staff 3.1.3 Local staff updates Link Attribute data base 3.1.4 Create Check Plots and Review 3.1.5 Create Query to transfer data to SCAG in TranPlan format ~.2 Capital Improvements Plans (Alternative Future Networks EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF WORK SW APD FOCUSED MODEL SCHEDULE I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG XXXX XX XX XXXX XXXX XX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX LEAD AGENCY RESP. POSITION WRCOGISCAG JWISB JWNRPA SS JW Page 2 SW APD FOCUSED MODEL SCOPE OF WORK 3.2 1 Create Maps/Tables/ArcView II Views with TIP I CIP data 3.2.2 At Workshop in Southwest APD distribute data and train staff 3.2.3 Create Check Plots and Review 3.2.4 Create QueryNiew to output network for appropriate alternative 3.2.5 Transfer data to SCAG 3.3 Monitoring Data 3.3.1 At Workshop ID key facilities that need to be monitored for both CMP 3.3.2 At workshop, train staff to enter data for attributes needed to calc LOS 3.3.3 Use spreadshee'ddBASE program to calc LOS. Insert LOS in dBASE. 3.3.4 Create Query to transfer data to RCTC/SCAG 3.3.5 Establish schedule for annual program 3.3.6 Create system for reviewing data in Time Series. 4.0 Socioeconomic Data 4.1 1994 Base Year Data EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF WORK 4.2 Future Year SW APD FOCUSED MODEL SCHEDULE I 2 3 4 5 6 7 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX X XX XX X X X XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX 4.1.1 Complete permit data Collection through June 30 DONE 4.1.2 Test and select most effective Geocoding methods XX 4.1.3 Geocode permits / assign x,y value to each permit XX 4.1.4 Produce Maps/TableslArcView II views for review X 4.1.5 Write Query to produce data in CTP format / Transfer to SCAG X 4.1.6 Aggregate to CTP Zones and Regional Zones X XX XXXX XXXX 4.2.1 Acquire 93 LU and new GP Coverages from AISISCAG XX XX 4.2.2 Create Development Constraints Coverage to help design (TAZ's) XXXX 4.2.3 Create Workshop Maps/Tables/ Views e.g. vacant land by GP LU XX 4.2.4 At workshop get input from Planning Directors by block/taz X 8 AUG LEAD AGENCY RESP. POSITION JWNRPA JW/VRPA SS JWISS JW WRCOGNRPA WRCOG JWISBNRPA JWNRPA JWNRPA JW JWNRPA JWNRPA KR KR/JWISS KR KR/JWISS KR/JW KR/SSIJW JWIKR SS~RMIJW---, JW/KRNRPA Page 3 SW APD FOCUSED MODEL SCOPE OF WORK 4.2.5 Transmit information to Terry Bills in appropriate format 4.2.6 Use SAAM or alternative procedure to distribute data 4.2.7 Create review maps/tables/views for members 4.2.8 Create Query to transmit data to SCAG in CTP format 4.2.9 Aggregate data to CTP Zones and Regional Zones 4.2.10 Develop alternative SED's ??? EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF WORK SW APD FOCUSED MODEL SCHEDULE I 2 3 4 JAN FEB MAR APR X XX X X X NOT PLANNED 5 6 7 8 MAY JUN JUL AUG LEAD AGENCY RESP. POSITION KR/JW JJIKPJJW/TB KR/JW KR/JW SSIKR 5.0 VALIDATION I CALIBRATION 51 Trip Distribution 5.1.1 Obtain trip length data (from O&D for SW RSA) 5.1.2 Compare trip length Statistics from ~""-avity Model with O&D data , .3 Introduce K-factors. if needed. to adjust gravity model 5.2 Mode Choice 5.2.1 Compare base model mode choice output with survey data 5.2.2 Adjust mode choice model parameters to reflect survey data 53 Trip Assignment 5.3.1 Collect a.m.p.m. peak-hour and 24-hour count data at key locations 53.2 Work with SCAG and local agencies to identify screenline locations 5.3.3 Work with SCAGNVRCOG to create ArcView views of monitoring data and model data 5.3.4 Adjust model to bring base year model in line with count data 5.3.5 Repeat 5.3.4 to achieve NCHRP 255 standards 5.3.6 Review validation results with SCAG / RCTC and local agencies ,~.~---, ..0 REFINEMENT OF VOLUMES 6.1 Link Volumes X X XXXX XXXX XXXX XX X X XXX X X XXXX XXXX X X X X XXXX XXXX X XXXX XXXX X HMA/SCAG EJN HMA EJN Page 4 SW APD FOCUSED MODEL SCOPE OF WORK 6.1.1 Compute delta between modeled and counted volumes in dBASE 6.1.2 Apply delta to 2015 volumes to get adjusted raw data 6.1.3 Convert Peak-Period volumes to Peak-Hour volumes 6.2 Intersection Volumes 6.2.1 Work with RCTC and local agencies to identify key intersections 6.2.2 Collect base year peak-hour turning movement data needed for LOS 6.2.3 Use NCHRP 255 to convert modeled volumes to turning volumes 7,0 DEFICIENCY ANALYSIS (Cities of Mumeta and Temecula Planning Areas only.) 7.1 Segment Analysis 7.1.1 Work with SCAGI RCTC to identify critical segments 7.1.2 Build database necessary to calculate LOS 7.1.3 Use AMLs (or an alternate procedure) to calculate segment LOS 7.2 Intersection Analysis 7.2.1 Establish interface between Arclnfo and the HMA CAPSSI program 7.2.2 Work with WRCOG et al. to put data for LOS calcs in monitoring database 7.2.3 Compute peak-hour LOS at key intersections EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF WORK SW APD FOCUSED MODEL SCHEDULE 1 2 3 4 JAN FEB MAR APR 5 6 7 MAY JUN JUL X X X X XXXX XXXX X X X 8 AUG LEAD AGENCY RESP, POSITION XXXX XXXX XXXX X X X XXXX XXXX X X HMA EJN X X 8.0 Alternatives Analysis (optional) 9.0 MODEL REVIEW AND EVALUATION 9.1 Evaluate Model on Ability to Meet CMP and Local requirements 9.2 Compare BeneFRs and Costs with Alternatives XXXX XX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX HMA/SCAG EJN VRPA Page 5 EXHIBIT C SCHEDULE OF HOURLY RATES EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 1995 Principal Senior Civil Engineer (P.E.) Senior Transportation Engineer (P.E.) Construction Inspector Systems Analyst Transportation Engineer Software Programmer CADD Operator Clerical Expert Witness -- Principal (Deposition & Trial) Subconsultants will be billed at cost plus 12% $140.00 $110.00 $90.00 $75.00 $75.00 $60.00 $50.00 $45.00 $40.00 $250.00 Conditions of Usa~re: The above rates are typically effective for a 12-.tonth period. but HMA maintains the right to change the billing rates at any ti.te for convenience of record keeping. Therefore. all billings will always be at the then-current billing rates. This will not affect any agreed-upon total or not-to- exceed fees. INVOICES WILL BE SUBMITTED MONTHLY AND SHALL BE DUE AND PAYABLE WITHIN 30 DAYS. A MONTHLY FINANCE CHARGE OF 1.5% SHALL BE CHARGED ON UNPAID BALANCES. 8tno~rtsumtsL.'hmoO ! 94.doc AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SOUTHWEST AREA PLANNING DISTRICT (SWAPD) FOCUSED MODEL DEVELOPMENT The WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS 0gRCOG), CITY OF MURRIETA, CITY OF TEMECULA, and HANK MOHLE AND ASSOCIATES, effective 1995, do hereby mutually agree as follows: 1. PARTIES: The parties to this agreement are WRCOG, the CITY OF MURRIETA, and the CITY OF TEMECULA (heroinafter collectively referred to as 'AGENCIES"), and HANK MOHLE AND ASSOCIATES, an engineering consultant firm acting as an independent contractor corporation (hereinafter referred to as "CONSULTANT"). OBLIGATIONS OF CONSULTANT: AGENCIES, pursuant to this agreement, hereby contract with CONSULTANT to act on their behalf directly and indirectly and in conjunction with AGENCIES' staff in providing the tasks as contained in the Scope of Work attached hemto as Exhibit A. CONSULTANT shall be responsible for tasks designated "HMA" under Lead Agency. The scope of services to be provided by CONSULTANT apply only to the area contained within the area referred to as the "Southwest Area Planning District," as shown on the map attached hereto as Exhibit B. ADMINISTRATION OF CONSULTING CONTRACT: AGENCIES hereby appoint the Executive Director of WRCOG (hereinafter referred to as Executive Director), or his designee or designees, in the application of AGENCIES' rights hereunder, and as AGENCIES' representative(s) in the review and administration of the work performed by CONSULTANT pursuant to the terms of CONSULTANT's Scope of Work. CONSULTANT and Executive Director, or his designee(s), shall meet as necessary for the purpose of discussing the project. PROJECT SCHEDULE AND SUBMITTAL DATES: CONSULTANT shall perform the designated "HMA" tasks contained in the Scope of Work in accordance with the schedule included with the Scope of Work attached hereto as Exhibit A. , TERM: This agreement shall become effective upon execution as authorized by the Executive Director and by the Directors of Public Works for both cities, or their designees as noted above, and shall terminate, if not terminated pursuant to the provisions contained hereinbelow, or otherwise extended by all parties, , 1995. COMPENSATION: CONSULTANT shall submit monthly invoices to the Assistant Director of WRCOG, which shall be due and payable within thirty (30) days. The hourly rams for services shall be as shown in Exhibit "C" attached to this contract and herein incorporated by reference. Notwithstanding the above payment schedule, all monies shall be due, except as provided for hereinbelow with respect to cancellation at the convenience of AGENCIES or for reasons of non~rformance. The total amount payable to CONSULTANT for services pursuant to this agreement shall not exceed fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00). It is understood the cities of Murrieta and Temecula are each responsible for reimbursing WRCOG the amount of twelve thousand five hundred dollars ($12,500.00) from each city in order to provide fifty percent (50%) funding for the CONSULTANT services. WRCOG shall invoice each city within thirty (30) days of the effective date of this agreement for twelve thousand five hundred dollars ($12,500.00). Each city shall reimburse WRCOG within thirty (30) days of the receipt of the WRCOG invoice. INTEREST OF CONSULTANT: CONSULTANT may not conduct business for third parties that may be in conflict with CONSULTANT's responsibilities under this contract. CONSULTANT may not solicit any business during the term of this contract that conflicts with his or her responsibilities under the contract. HOLD HARMLESS: CONSULTANT agrees to save, indemnify, hold harmless, and defend (with attorneys approved by AGENCIES) AGENCIES, their officers, agents, employees, and independent contractors from and against all liability, claims, costs, and expenses (including, without limitation, attorney's fees) arising from loss of or damage to any property whatsoever or injury to or death of any person whomsoever caused or occasioned by the negligent or wrongful act or omission of CONSULTANT or any agent or employee of CONSULTANT, arising out of or in connection with this agreement or ~hhm~0194.~'!~f 2 the work to be performed by CONSULTANT hereunder. 9. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT FOR CAUSE: If, through any cause, CONSULTANT shall fail to fulfill in a timely and proper manner his obligations under this agreement, or if CONSULTANT shall violate any of the covenants, agreements, or stipulations of this agreement, AGENCIES shall have the right to terminate this agreement by giving written notice to CONSULTANT of such termination and specifying the effective date thereof. In that event, all finished or unfinished documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, reports, and other materials as stated hereinbelow prepared by CONSULTANT shall, at the option of AGENCIES, become the property of AGENCIES, and CONSULTANT shah be entitled: to receive compensation in accordance with this contract for any work satisfactorily completed on such documents and other materials up to the effective date of notice of termination, not to exceed the amounts payable hereinabove, less any appropriate offset. 10. TERMINATION FOR CONVENIENCE OF AGENCIES: AGENCIES may terminate this agreement at any time and without cause by giving written notice to CONSULTANT of such termination at least fifteen (15) days before the effective date of such termination. In that event, all finished and unfinished documents and other .materials described hereinbelow shall, at the option of AGENCIES, become AGENCIES' sole and exclusive property. If the agreement is terminated by AGENCIES as provided in this paragraph, CONSULTANT shall be entitled to receive compensation in accordance with this contract for any work completed on such documents and other materials to the effective date of such termination. CONSULTANT hereby expressly waives any and all claims for damages or compensation arising under this agreement except as set forth hereinabove in the event of such termination. 11. ASSIGNABILITY: CONSULTANT shall not assign or subcontract any interest in this agreement, shall not transfer any interest in the same (whether by assignment or novalion), and shall not delegate any performance hereunder (including hiring or retaining use of any other person or entity for any purpose) without prior written consent of AGENCIES, provided, however, that claims for money due or to become due to CONSULTANT from AGENCIES under this agreement may be assigned to a bank, trust company, or other financial institution without such approval. Notice of such assignment or transfer shall be furnished promptly to AGENCIES. Any assignment requiring approval may not be further assigned without AGENCIES approval. 12. 13. 14. 15. OWNERSHIP. PUBLICATION. REPRODUCTION. AND USE OF MATERIAL: All reports, studies, information, dam, statistics, forms, designs, plans, procedures, systems, and any other materials or properties produced under this agreement shall be the sole and exclusive property of AGENCIES. No such materials or properties produced in whole or in part under this agreement shall be subject to private use, copyrights, or patent right by CONSULTANT in the United States or in any other country without the express written consent of AGENCIES. AGENCIES shall have unrestricted authority to publish, disclose (as may be limited by the provisions of the Public Records Act), distribute, and otherwise use, copyright, or patent, in whole or in part, any such reports, studies, data, statistics, forms, or other materials or properties produced under this agreement. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR: AGENCIES are interested only in the results obtained, and CONSULTANT shall perform as an independent contractor with sole control of the manner and means of performing the services required under this agreement. AGENCIES maintain the right only to reject or accept CONSULTANT's final work product as each phase of this agreement is completed. CONSULTANT and any of CONSULTANT's agents, employees, or representatives are, for all purposes under this agreement, an independent contractor, and shall not be deemed to be an employee of AGENCIES, and none of them shall be entitled to any benefits to which AGENCIES' employees are enti~ed, including, but not limited to, overtime, retirement benefits, worker's compensation benefits, injury leave, or other leave benefits. CHANGES: AGENCIES may from time to time require changes in the scope of the services by CONSULTANT to be performed under this agreement. Such changes, including any increase or decrease in the amount of CONSULTANT's compensation, that axe mutually agreed upon by AGENCIES and CONSULTANT shall be effective as amendments to this agreement only when in writing, and no amendments shall increase the total amount payable by more than ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00) without approval of the two City Councils. GENERAL CONDITIONS CONSULTANT shah provide no services for any private client within the corporate boundaries or sphere of influence of AGENCIES during the period of this agreement that may constitute a conflict of interest. CONSULTANT shall be bound by the requirements of the FPPC (and State law) with regard to disclosure of financial interests and prohibited conflicts of interest. AGENCIES shall not be called upon to assume and CONSULTANT shall save, defend, indemnify, and hold harmless AGENCIES against any liability or claim for the direct payment of any salary, wage, or other compensation to any person employed by CONSULTANT performing services hemunder for AGENCIES or for any employee-related claims, including, but not limited to, worker's compensation claims. The paxties understand and agree that CONSULTANT is acting strictly as an independent contractor under the terms of this agreement, and this agreement is not intended to establish an employer-employee relationship between AGENCIES, on the one hand, and CONSULTANT or any of its employees, on the other hand. If and when permitted hereunder, all officers, agents, employees, subcontractors, their agents,. officers, and employees who are hired by or engaged by CONSULTANT in the performance of this agreement shall be deemed officers, agents, employees, and subcontractors of CONSULTANT, and AGENCIES shall not be liable or responsible to such personnel for anything whatsoever. CONSULTANT agrees to indemnify, save, keep, and hold harmless AGENCIES and all of their officers and employees from all damages, costs, or expenses in law and equity including, but not limited to, costs of suit and attorney's fees and expenses for legal services that may at any time arise or be set up because of damage to property or injury to persons received or suffered by reason of any negligent or other actionable act or omission on the part of CONSULTANT or any its agents, officers, employees, and subcontractors in the performance of this agreement. Payment to CONSULTANT of compensation hereunder shall not be deemed to waive AGENCIES' rights or CONSULTANT' s obligations hereunder. CONSULTANT agrees to and shall at its own cost and expense procure and maintain during the term of this agreement general liability insurance in an amount of not less than one million dollars ($1 ,000,0(X}.00) per occurrence and annual aggregate. Such insurance shall be procured from an insurer authorized to do business in California. AGENCIES shall be named as additional insureds, and the insurance required hereunder shall be primary and not contributing with any other insurance available to or obtained by AGENCIES. In addition, CONSULTANT shall obtain Worker's Compensation Insurance covering all of its employees (where such employment or retention is approved by AGENCIES hereunder) as required by law. CONSULTANT shall obtain professional liability insurance in the amount of one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) per occurrence and annual aggregate. CONSULTANT shall provide AGENCIES with satisfactory evidence that such insurance has been paid. Certificates of Insurance shall be filed with AGENCIES and shall contain provisions that AGENCIES will be given G, thirty (30) days' written notice in advance of cancellation of any policy of insurance. In the event any action is brought by either party to construe this agreement or enforce any of its terms, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its reasonable attorney's fees and costs incurred, whether or not the matter proceeds to judgment. Upon termination of this agreement as provided hereinabove, CONSULTANT shall, within such reasonable period as may be directed by the Executive Director, complete those items of work that are in various stages of completion and that the Executive Director determines are necessary to be completed by CONSULTANT to allow the project to be completed in a timely, logical, and orderly manner. Upon termination, all finished or unfinished documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, models, photographs, reports, and other material prepared by CONSULTANT under this agreement shall be delivered to the Executive Director upon request, as property of AGENCIES. The rights and remedies of AGENCIES provided in this agreement are not intended to be exclusive, and are in addition to any other rights and remedies permitted by law. CONSULTANT does not currently anticipate using subcontractors other than as stated in Exhibit A for performance of its services under this agreement. In the event subcontractors are anticipated in the future, CONSULTANT shall first obtain the prior written consent of AGENCIES through the Executive Director. CONSULTANT has provided a listing of personnel in the attached Exhibit A. These personnel shall not be removed or replaced without the prior written concurrence of AGENCIES through the Executive Director. In performing all services hereunder, CONSULTANT shall comply with all applicable laws and regulations of AGENCIES and/or all other relevant government agencies. Also, CONSULTANT certifies and agrees that all persons employed by CONSULTANT, its affiliates, subsidiaries, and related entities, if any, will be treated equally by CONSULTANT, without unlawful discrimination based upon creed, sex, race, or national origin. If AGENCIES find that any of the provisions of this paragraph have been violated, such violation shall constitute a material breach of this agreement upon which AGENCIES may determine to cancel, terminate, or suspend the agreement. While AGENCIES reserve the right to determine independently that the antidiscrimination provisions of the agreement have been violated, in addition, a determination by the California Fair Employment Practices Commission, or suece, ssor agency, or the Federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, or successor agency, that CONSULTANT has violated State or Federal antidiscrimination laws relative to this agreement shall constitute a finding by AGENCIES that CONSULTANT has violated the antidiscrimination provisions of this agreement. Notices or correspondence relating to this agreement shall be in writing. Any notices to be given hereunder shall be effective when personally delivered, or two (2) days after placing in the United States Mail by certified mail, postage prepaid, and addressed to the party to whom the notice is directed. The current addresses of the parties are as follows: AGENCIES Assistant Director Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG) 3737 Main Street, Suite 420 Riverside, CA 92501 CONSULTANT R. Henry Mohle Hank Mohle & Associates 901 East Imperial Highway, Suite A La Habra, CA 90631 Work to be performed by CONSULTANT hereunder shall commence immediately, and upon commencement of such work, CONSULTANT's right to compensation therefor shall thereupon accrue. CONSULTANT agrees that AGENCIES or any of their duly authorized representatives shall at any reasonable time during regular business hours have access to and the right to examine, audit, excerpt, copy, or transcribe any. pertinent transaction, activity, time and work records, employment records, or other records relating to this agreement. Such material, including all pertinent cost accounting, financial records, and proprietary data, must be kept and maintained by CONSULTANT for a period of at least four (4) years or for the period required by law, whichever is greater, after completion of CONSULTANT' s performance hereunder, unless AGENCIES' written permission is given to dispose of same prior to that time. Except as otherwise provided by law, all reports, communications, documents, and information obtained or prepared by CONSULTANT in connection with its work hereunder, shall not be published without prior consent of the Executive Director, nor shall CONSULTANT issue any news releases or publish information relating to its work hereunder without the prior consent of the Executive Director. The invalidity in whole or in part of any provision hereof shall not void or affect the validity of any other provision. O, No waiver or breach of any provision hereof by either party shall constitute a waiver of any other or future breach. Failure of either party to enforce any provision hereof at any time or from time to time shall not be construed as a waiver thereof. This agreement is intended to be binding on the parties, and their respective successors and assigns. The plural shall include the singular, and the singular shall include the plural and neuter wherever the context so requires. CONSULTANT will perform the services set out in this agreement, as contemplated herein, in an efficient, timely, and professional manner and in accordance with generally accepted standards for performing similar services. It is understood that the AGENCIES, in entering into this agreement, are relying on CONSULTANT' s representations for quality and professional work performed in a timely manner, and CONSULTANT shall perform in accordance with those representations and standards. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have accepted, made, and executed this agreement upon the terms, conditions, and provisions above stated. CONSULTANT: Hank Mohle & Associates By: R. Henry Mohle President AGENCIES: City of Murrieta Western Riverside Council of Governments By: By: Ben Minamide Director of Public Works/City Engineer A.J. Wilson Executive Director prop~alXtemecula'~thmoO!94.wpf 8 City of Temecula By: Ronald E. Bradley City Manager propotal~l~mecula~rhnmOI 94 .~pf SW APD FOCUSED MODEL SCOPE OF WORK 1,0 TAZ DEVELOPMENT 1.1 Realign Local TAZ's with Census Geography EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF WORK 1.2 Develop Correspondence Tables SW APD FOCUSED MODEL SCHEDULE I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX X 1.1.1 Adjust Local TAZ's to Census Block Boundaries XXX 1.1.2 Adjust Local TAZ's to reflect 1990 and General Plan land use XX X 1.1.3 Provide maps for SCAG and local agency review XX 1.1.4 Design centroid and centtold connector system XXX 1.1.5 Provide WRCOG with TAZ Map in · dxf format for conversion X XXXX X 1 ·2.1 Use Polygon Overlay on Block ID's to generate Table 1.2.2 Aggregate 1990 block data to 1.2.3 Add Geocoded data for 1990 - 1994 derived from permit data XX XX X LEAD AGENCY RESP, POSITION HMA EJN WRCOG/SCAG JWISBISS 2.0 NETWORK DEVELOPMENT 2.1 Road Network - Focused Area XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXX 2.1.1 Obtain Centerline coverage from Riverside Co. I SCAG X 2.1.2 Clip Coverage to SW APD X 2.1.3 Select arcs for Model Network XX 2.1.4 Delete unnecessary arcs I nodes X 21.5 Add Centroid and Zone Connectors XX 2.1.6 Edit CTP network near SW APD Boundary to match focus area XX 2.1.7 Create Check Plots I ArcView views for Review XX 2.1.8 Edit final network and convert to TranPlan X XXX 2.2 Road Network - Outside Focused Area 2.2.1 Generalize Zones outside focus area XXXX SCAG Page I SW APD FOCUSED MODEL SCOPE OF WORK 2,2,2 Drop all zone connectors, primary/secondary roads from LA, OR,VEN 2.2.3 Add back new zone connectors to LA, ORA, VEN 2.2.4 Combine networks and check in TranPlan 2.2.5 Create Plots and ArcView views for review 2.2.6 Edit network and test in TranPlan 23 Transit Network - Outside Focused Area 2.3.1 Create transit network outside focus area 2.3.2 Add transit zone connectors - walk and Park-and-ride connectors 24 Transit Network - Focused Area .2 Obtain transit networks from local operators I TmnsStar (RTA/CTS) 2.4.3 Create focus area transit routes in Arc/Info and TranPlan 2.4.4 Add transit zone connectors - walk and Park-and-ride connectors 2.4.5 Merge and edit outside area and focused area 2.4.5 Circulate maps / views for local review 2.4.6 Make final edits 3,0 Network Attributes 3.1 Link Attributes 3.1.1 Create Maps/TableslArcView II Views of focused Network 3.1.2 At Workshop in Southwest APD distribute data and train staff 3.1.3 Local staff updates Link Attribute data base 3.1.4 Create Check Plots and Review 3.1.5 Create Queq to transfer data to ,,_,.S. CAG in TranPlan format .,2 Capital Improvements Plans I(Altemative Future Networks EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF WORK SW APD FOCUSED MODEL SCHEDULE I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG XXXX XX XX XXXX XXXX XX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX LEAD AGENCY RESP, POSITION WRCOGISCAG JWISB JW/VRPA SS JW Page 2 SW APD FOCUSED MODEL SCOPE OF WORK 3.2.1 Create Maps/Tables/ArcView II Views with TIP / CIP data 3.2.2 At Workshop in Southwest APD distribute data and train staff 3.2.3 Create Check Plots and Review 3.2.4 Create QueryNiew to output network for appropriate alternative 3.2.5 Transfer data to SCAG 3.3 Monitoring Data 3.3.1 At Workshop ID key facilities that need to be monitored for both CMP 3.3.2 At workshop, train staff to enter data for attributes needed to calc LOS 3.3.3 Use spreadsheet/dBASE program to calc LOS. Insert LOS in dBASE. 3.3.4 Create Query to transfer data to RCTCISCAG 3.3.5 Establish schedule for annual program 3.3.6 Create system for reviewing data in Time Series. 4.0 Socioeconomic Data 4.1 1994 Base Year Data EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF WORK '4.2 Future Year SW APD FOCUSED MODEL SCHEDULE I 2 3 4 5 6 7 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX X XX XX XX X X X XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX 4.1.1 Complete permit data Collection through June 30 DONE 4.1.2 Test and select most effective Geocoding methods XX 4.1.3 Geocode permits I assign x,y value to each permit XX 4.1.4 Produce Maps/Tables/ArcView II views for review X 4.1.5 Write Query to produce data in CTP format / Transfer to SCAG X 4.1.6 Aggregate to CTP Zones and Regional Zones X XX XXXX XXXX 4.2.1 Acquire 93 LU and new GP Coverages from AIS/SCAG XX XX 4.2.2 Create Development Constraints Coverage to help design (TAZ's) XXXX 4.2.3 Create Woficshop Maps/Tables/ Views e.g. vacant land by GP LU XX 4.2.4 At workshop get input from Planning Directors by block/taz X 8 AUG LEAD AGENCY RESP. POSITION JWNRPA JWNRPA SS JWISS , JW WRCOGNRPA WRCOG JW/SBNRPA JWNRPA JWNRPA JW JWNRPA JWNRPA KR KR/JWISS KR KR/JWPSS KR/JW KR/SS/JW JWIKR SS/RMIJW~-~ SS/RM/JW JW/KR/VRPA Page 3 SW APD FOCUSED MODEL SCOPE OF WORK 4.2.5 Transmit information to Terry Bills in appropriate format 4.2.6 Use SAAM or alternative procedure to distribute data 4.2.7 Create review maps/tables/views for members 4.2.8 Create Query to transmit data to SCAG in CTP format 4.2.9 Aggregate data to CTP Zones and Regional Zones 4.2.10 Develop alternative SED's ??? EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF WORK SW APD FOCUSED MODEL SCHEDULE I 2 3 4 JAN FEB MAR APR X XX X X X NOT PLANNED 5 6 7 8 MAY JUN JUL AUG LEAD AGENCY RESP, POSITION KR/JW JJIKR/JW/TB KR/JW KR/JW SSIKR 5.0 VALIDATION / CALIBRATION 5.1 Trip Distribution 51.1 Obtain trip length data (from O&D for SW RSA) 5.1.2 Compare trip length Statistics from ~ 3vity Model with O&D data .3 Introduce K-factors, if needed, to adjust gravity model 5.2 Mode Choice 5.2.1 Compare base model mode choice output with survey data 5.2.2 Adjust mode choice model parameters to reflect survey data 5.3 Trip Assignment 5.3.1 Collect a.m.p.m. peak-hour and 24-hour count data at key locations 5.3.2 Work with SCAG and local agencies to identify screenline locations 5.3.3 Work with SCAG/WRCOG to create ArcView views of monitoring data and model data 5.3.4 Adjust model to bring base year model in line with count data 5.3.5 Repeat 5.3.4 to achieve NCHRP 255 standards 5.3.6 Review validation results with /~,SCAG I RCTC and local agencies ,,0 REFINEMENT OF VOLUMES 6.1 Link Volumes X X XXXX XXXX XXXX XX X X XXX X X XXXX XXXX X X X X XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX HMA/SCAG EJN HMA EJN Page 4 EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF WORK $W APD FOCUSED MODEL SCHEDULE $W APD FOCUSED MODEL SCOPE OF WORK 6.1.1 Compute delta between modeled and counted volumes in dBASE 6.1.2 Apply delta to 2015 volumes to get adjusted raw data 6.1.3 Convert Peak-Period volumes to Peak-Hour volumes I 2 3 4 5 6 7 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL X X X 8 AUG 6.2 Intersection Volumes X XXXX XXXX 6.2.1 Work with RCTC and local agencies to identify key intersections 6.2.2 Collect base year peak-hour turning movement data needed for LOS 6.2.3 Use NCHRP 255 to convert modeled volumes to turning volumes X X X 7.0 DEFICIENCY ANALYSIS (Cities of Murrieta and Temecula Planning Areas only.) LEAD AGENCY RESP. POSITION 7.1 Segment Analysis XXXX XXXX XXXX 7,1.1 Work with SCAG/RCTC to identify critical segments 7.1.2 Build database necessary to calculate LOS 7.1.3 Use AMLs (or an alternate procedure) to calculate segment LOS X X HMA EJN 7.2 Intersection Analysis X 7.2.1 Establish intertace between Arclnfo and the HMA CAPSSI program 7.2.2 Work with WRCOG et al. to put data for LOS calcs in monitoring database 7.2.3 Compute peak-hour LOS at key intersections X XXXX XXXX X X X 8.0 Alternatives Analysis ( optional ) 9.0 MODEL REVIEW AND EVALUATION 9.1 Evaluate Model on Ability to Meet CMP and Local requirements 9.2 Compare Benefits and Costs with Altematives XXXX XX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX HMA/SCAG EJN VRPA Page 5 EXHIBIT C SCHEDULE OF HOURLY RATES EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 1995 Principal Senior Civil Engineer (P.E.) Senior Transportation Engineer (P.E.) Construction Inspector Systems Analyst Transportation Engineer Software Programmer CADD Operator Clerical Expert Witness -- Principal (Deposition & Trial) Subconsultants will be billed at cost plus 12% $140.00 $110.00 $90.00 $75.00 $75.00 $60.00 $50.00 $45.00 $40.00 $250.00 Conditions of Usayee: The above rates are (vpicall. v effective for a 12-month period, but HMA maintains the right to change the billing rates at an.v time for convenience of record keeping. Therefore, all billings will always be at the then-current billing rates. This will not affect any agreed-upon total or not-to- exceed fees. INVOICES WILL BE SUBMITTED MONTHLY AND SHALL BE DUE AND PAYABLE WITHIN 30 DAYS. A MONTHLY FINANCE CHARGE OF 1.5% SHALL BE CHARGED ON UNPAID BALANCES. genoff~resumasLrhmoO 194. doc ITEM 10 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CTTY I~A~AGEI~ ~ \ 'CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Genie Roberrs, Finance Office~. February 28, 1995 Review and Approval of the 21st Year FY 95-96 Community Development Block Grant Applications RECOMMENDATION: 1. Review and provide direction to staff as to the funding of projects for the 21 st Year FY 95-96 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program. 2. Authorize staff to forward the selected CDBG project applications to the Riverside County Economic Development Agency (EDA). DISCUSSION: The CDBG program is a federal grant program administered by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) through which projects at the local government level may be funded. This program is administered locally through the Riverside County EDA. The objectives of the CDBG program are to develop adequate housing, a suitable living environment and increase economic opportunities in the community. In order to be considered for funding, a CDBG grant application must meet one of the following national goals: Low/moderate income persons ere primarily benefitted by the activity; or The activity aids in the prevention or elimination of slums or blight; or The activity meets an urgent (emergency) community development need. A total of ten (10) applications for FY 95-96 funding were submitted to the City for consideration. The funding requests total $258,186. The projects are listed in Attachment A, which includes a brief description of each program. The County of Riverside has informed the City that the funding allocation for FY 95-96 has not been determined, however it is anticipated to be between ~200,000 and ~250,000. Further, HUD specifies that not more than 1596 of the City's total allocation may be used for projects within the category of public services. Given the range of the City's 21st year anticipated CDBG allocation, the 15% available for public services projects will be between $30,000 and $37,500. The funds remaining for other non-public service CDBG projects would then be between el 70,000and $212,500. The County has also confirmed that there is $45,527 carryover from the 20th year. This carryover may only be used for non-public service projects. The funding requests for Public Service projects total ~61,686. Except under certain circumstances, County guidelines require that individual grant awards must be a minimum of $10,000. The Finance Committee, Mayor Stone and Mayor Pro Tam Karel Lindemans, reviewed all CDBG applications. After reviewing the Public Service applications, the Finance Committee recommended funding of ~37,500, as outlined in Attachment A. In addition to the Public Service funding requests, two non-Public Service applications were submitted by the City. These projects total $196,500 and provide retrofitting to four existing park sites to meet American Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements including play equipment accessibility, picnicking accessibility and walkways with handicap access ramps and handicap accessible public restrooms in Old Town Temecule. The Finance Committee has recommended funding priorities which ere indicated on Attachment A. If the City's total CDBG allocation does not provide for sufficient funding of the non-Public Service projects, the City Council may wish to consider funding by priority. FISCAL IMPACT: To the extent that CDBG funds are allocated to City projects, funds from other City sources (i.e., General Fund, Community Services District) will not be required to be allocated. The approval of CDBG funds for outside entities has no fiscal impact on the City as these funds are received from an external funding source. Attachment A Project Summary 2 ATTACHMENT A COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT APPLICATIONS FISCAL YEAR 95-96 PROJECT CATEGORY Public Service Public Service Public Service Public Service Public Service Public Service Public Service Public Service Public Facilities Public Facilities Public Facilities Public Facilities ORGANIZATION Alternatives to Domestic Violence Assistance League of Temecula Valley Boys and Girls Club St. Catherine Catholic Church Parent Center Riverside County Dept of Community Action (DCA) Senior Citizens Service Center of the Temecula Rancho Area, Inc. Valley Intervention Program for Tots (VIP TOTS) City of Temecula ADA Park Project City of Temecula ADA Public Restroom Project City of Temacula Sam Hicks Monument Park City of Temecula Sidewalk Handicap Access Ramps TOTAL 94-95 FUNDING FUNDING FUNDING REQUEST RECMD'D $10,000 $10,000 $2,500 $5,000 $10,000 $5,000 0 $10,697 $10,000 0 $10,000 0 0 $5,000 $5,000 0 $989 0 $10,000 ~10,000 $10,000 0 $5,000 $5,000 0 $161,500 $161,500 0 $35,000 $35,000 $179,521 0 0 $30,000 0 0 $234,521 $258,186 $234,000 PRIORITY 6 3 2 4 PROJECT SUMMARY Name of Project: Altematives to Domestic Violence Project Category: Public Service Funding Requested: $10,000 Geographic Area to be Served: Countywide Project Description: Funding is requested to continue serving victims of domestic violence and their children. Services offered include counseling, information referral, 24 hour hctline, and emergency shelters for victims of domestic violence. The Countywide 24-hour crisis line responds to 13,000 calls per year. Approximately 1,600 of these calls come from the I-15 region which includes Temecula. Emergency shelter is provided to approximately 33 individuals from the Temecula region. The Program also provides 150 community education presentations for increasing awareness of domestic violence and preventing domestic violence. CDBG funding in the amount of $10,000 was approved for this project in the past two years. Continued funding of this project will help sustain the present Crisis Line, Outreach and Shelter service levels. This project qualifies for funding in accordance .with benefit to low and moderate income persons. Name of Project: Assistance League of Temecula Valley Project Category: Public Service Funding Requested: $10,000 Geographic Area to be Served: Temecula School District, Lake Bsinore School District, and Murrieta School District. Project Description: The project, known as Operation School Bell, provides clothing and school supplies for needy school age children. A cost of ~85.00 is allocated to each child served. Approximately 250 children will be served by this funding request, representing 120 families. Since September, 1993 Operation School Bell has clothed 257 children. Of these 130 have been from the Temecula School District. CDBG funding in the amount of ~5,000 was approved for this project in the past year. The project's documentation procedures to verify service to low/moderate income persons were not fully implemented in the current year, however, staff continues to seek compliance with these requirements. Name of Project: Boys and Gids Club Project Category: Public Service Funding Requested: $10,697 Geographic Area to be Sewed: City of Temecula Project Description: This proposed project addresses the needs for low income families and through "A.M./P.M. Camp" which provides before and after school care, plus transportation to and from all Temecula grammar and middle schools. The facility is open from 6:30 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. The program coincides with the Track B schedule, which is the largest percentage of children in school. The care will be provided for 354 school age children from 1st through 8th grade. The program also offers "Power Hour", which is a - homework assistance and tutoring program for the children. It also offers access to computers for additional educational assistance through educational games. Name of Project: St. Cathedne's Catholic Church Project Category: Public Service Funding Requested: $10,000 Geographic Area to be Served: Countywide Project Description: This project provides emergency food, utility assistance and financial aide for the needy. The program serves approx. 7,200 people per year. Funding is requested to purchase food, provide utility assistance and pay for temporary lodging. Although income information may be obtained from on-going clients, income verifications are not obtained from one-time clients. Thus, there is no means of verifying that 51% of the clients are low/moderate income individuals. Name of Project: Parent Center Project Category: Public Service Funding Requested: $5,000 Geographic Area to be Served: Temecula Project Description: The Parent Center's mission is to provide quality educational and personal workshops, seminars, classes and support groups that will empower parents and assist them in their efforts to build full-functioning families. Presently the Parent Center serves approximately 500 parents and 200 children per month. To best maximize the Parent Center's services, child care is available during workshops, classes and library use. Name of Project: Riverside County Dept of Community Action (DCA) Project Category: Public Service Funding Requested: $989 Geographic Area to be Served: City of Temecula Project Description: The Emergency Cold Weather Shelter Program (ECWSP), serving the Temecula area, will open a life-saving shelter to homeless families and individuals from November I through March 31 during periods of severe cold weather. The ECWSP in Hemet provides 100 beds per night for the duration of the program. It is important to note that ECWSP states that they never turn anyone away in need. Name of Project: Senior Citizens Service Center of the Temecula Rancho Area, Inc. Project Category: Public Service Funding Requested: $10,000 Geographic Area to be Served: County-wide Project Description: The program serves approximately 20,000 people per year within the City's sphere of influence. Funding requested is to provide emergency food, utility assistance and financial aide. CDBG funding in the amount of ~10,000 was approved for this project in the current fiscal year. This project qualifies for funding in accordance with benefit to low/moderate income persons. However, this organization may require staff assistance to fully implement the required documentation to validate 51% service to low/moderate income persons. Backup documentation from FY 94-95 is still outstanding. Name of Project: Valley Intervention Program for Tots (VIP TOTS) Project Category: Public Service Funding Requested: aS,000 Geographic Area to be Served: Southwest Riverside County Project Description: The Family Friends project coordinates senior citizen volunteers with disabled/low income children and their families. This program collaborates with the Riverside County Office on Aging to provide practical assistance to meet the demands of daily living with a disabled or chronically ill child. The volunteer spends a few hours each week with the children in their home, reading to a sibling, accompany a mother and child to medical appointment, or be a good listener to an overworked, stressed parent. Name of Project: City of Temecula - American Disabilities Act Park Rehabilitation Project Project Category: Public Facilities Funding Requested: $161,500 Geographic Area to be Sewed: City-wide Project Description: This project will rehabilitate four existing City parks (Veteran's Park, Calla Aragon Park, John Magee Park and Rancho California Sports Park) to meet American Disabilities Act standards for handicap access to park amenities. Name of Project: City of Temecula -Amedcan Disabilities Act Public Restroom Project Project Category: Public Facilities Funding Requested: $35,000 Geographic Area to be Served: City-wide Project Description: This project will fund the acquisition of a portable handicap restroom facility for Old Town Temecula that meets ADA requirements that are located in the Redevelopment Area. Additionally, funds would be used to design and construct a western facade so the facility will be compatible with Old Town. The funds will also be used to extend a water hook-up to the facility. ITEM 11 CITY MANAGER~ TO'- FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Interim Director of Public Works\City Engineer February 28, 1995 Professional Services for the Design of an Interim Traffic Signal for the .. Intersection of State Route 79(S) with Margarita Road/Redhawk Parkway, Pala Road and La Paz Street PREPARED BY: Martin C. Lauber, Traffic Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve Professional Services Agreements for the design of an interim traffic signal for the intersections of State Route 79(S): 1. Margarita Road/Redhawk Parkway BRW, Inc. $5,474.00 2. Pala Road Albert Grover & Assoc. $5,230.00 3. La Paz Street Transtech $5,065.00 BACKGROUND: The City of Temacula has received approval for $109,200 for the construction of an interim traffic signal at State Route 79(S) and Margarita Road/Redhawk Parkway. The funding was allocated through the Riverside County STP Formula Funds Program. The intersection of State Route 79(S) and Margarita Road/Redhawk Parkway is currently controlled by an all-way stop configuration. Three of the four roadway approaches are constructed at their ultimate width. The east side of Margarita Road, north of SR 79 (S) is the only side requiring future construction improvements to allow two northbound departure lanes. The interim traffic signal plan will be designed to fit ultimate conditions with only minor future alterations required. Assessment District 159 plans to incorporate the ultimate traffic signal construction into final roadway improvements. The timing of these improvements is uncertain due to the many variables controlling project financing. Staff has prepared Requests For Proposals (RFP) for Professional Engineering Services for the preparation of plans, specifications and estimates for all three (3) interim traffic signal improvements. Staff reviewed proposals from ten (10) firms. r:.~agdrpt%gb'~022~trafig.h791atl~ All firms are required to submit plans for City review twenty (20) working days after awarding the contract. The final construction documents should be ready for construction approximately two (2) months after the Notice to Proceed. FISCAL IMPACT: The total design cost for all interim traffic signals as listed in the recommendation is $15,769. Funds are available in Development Impact Fees/Traffic Signal Mitigation Account No. 210- 165-645-5802. Attachment: Agreements: BRW, Inc. Albert Grover & Assoc. Transtech r.~gdrl~95%O228%trafeig .h791aip PROFESSIONAL SERVICES This Agreement was made and entered into this 28th day of February, 1995, by and between the City of Temecula ("City"), a municipal corporation, and BRW, Inc., a California Corporation ("Consultant"). The parties her·to mutually agree as follows: Services. Consultant shall perform the tasks set forth in Exhibit "A" attached her·to. Consultant shall complete the tasks according to the schedule set forth in Exhibit "A". Performance. Consultant shall st all times, faithfully, industrially and to the best of his ability, experience and talent, perform all tasks described herein. e Payment. The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, at the hourly rates set forth in Exhibit "B" attached her·to, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. This amount will not exceed $5,474.00 for the total term of the Agreement unless additional payment is approved by the City Council; orovided that the City Manager may approve additional payment not to exceed ten percent (10%) of the Agreement; but in no event more than $10,000.00. Consultant will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed. Invoices shall be submitted on or about the first business day of each month, for services provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice. Amendments. This Agreement may be amended so long as such amendment is in writing and agreed upon by both the City Council and Consultant. Ownership of Documents. Upon satisfactory completion of or in the event of termination, suspension or abandonment of this Agreement, all original documents, designs, drawings, and notes prepared in the course of providing the services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission of the Consultant. Termination. The City may terminate this Agreement without cause so long as written notice of intent to terminate is given to Consultant at least three (3) days prior to the termination date. In the event of termination, Consultant shall be paid for the services performed. Indemnification. The Consultant agrees to indemnify and save harmless the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from end against any and all claims, demands, losses, defense cost, or liability of any kind or nature which the City, its officers, agents and employees may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of Consultant's acts or omissions under the terms of this Agreement, excepting only liability arising out of the sole negligence of the City. - 1 - r:%rfp%O34%brw.egrlajp 10. 11. Status of Consultant. Consdtant is an independent contractor in all respects in the performance of this Agreement and shall not be considered an employee of the City for any purpose. No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for performing services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder. Term. This Agreement shall commence on February 28, 1995, and shall remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than February 28, 1996. nefs,~t. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under the terms of this -. Agreement, the City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work performed after the date of default. Default shall include not performing the tasks described herein to the reasonable satisfaction of the City Manager of the City. Failure by the Consultant to make progress in the performance of work hereunder, if such failure arises out of causes beyond his control, and without fault or negligence of the Consultant, shall not be considered a default. Any disputes regarding performance, default or other matters in dispute between the City and the Consultant arising out of this Agreement or breech thereof, shall be resolved by arbitration. The arbitrator's decision shall be final. Consultant shall select an arbitrator from a list provided by the City of three retired judges of the Judicial Arbitration end Mediation Services, Inc. The arbitration hearing shall be conducted according to California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1280, 9t sea. City and Consultant shall share the cost of the arbitration equally. Notices. Notices shall be given pursuant to this Agreement by personal service on the party to be notified, or by written notice .upon such party deposited in the custody of the United States Postal Service addressed as follows: City: Attention: City Manager City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 be Consultant: BRW, Inc. 620 C Street, Suite 300 San Diego, California 92101 The notices shall be deemed to have been given as of the date of personal service, or three (3) days after the date of deposit of the same in the custody of the United States Postal Service. -2- r:\rfp%O34%brw.agrlajP 12. Entire Aoreement. This Agreement and any documents or instrument attached hereto or referred to herein integrate all terms and conditions mentioned herein or incidental hereto supersede all negotiations and prior writing in respect to the subject matter hereof. In the event of conflict between the terms, conditions, or provisions of this Agreement end any such document or instrument, the terms and conditions of this Agreement shall prevail. 13. Liability. Except as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for performing services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder. Consultant agrees to indemnify, release and hold harmless the City, its officers,, agents, employees, and representatives for all claims or losses the City may suffer resulting from any negligent actions or omissions by Consultant. Consultant shell secure workers' compensation insurance. Upon request of Consultant, the City shall add Consultant to the City's workers' compensation policy and the Consultant shall reimburse the City for the cost of said insurance premiums. : 14. Licenses. Consultant and subconsultant shall obtain all necessary licenses, including but not limited to, City Business Licenses. The parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date and year above written. CONSULTANT CITY OF TEMECULA By: By Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk -3- r:~rfp~034~brw .agrlejp EXHIBIT "A" TASKS TO BE PERFORMED INTERIM TRAFFIC SIGNAL State Route 79 (S) at Margarita Road/Redhawk Parkway Prepare a detailed list of the items of work to be performed by the consultant. Conduct an investigation to confirm existing roadway geometrics and utility locations. Prepare an Interim Traffic Signal plan, with Cover Sheet, on City title block sheets which will accommodate future modifications required to match the ultimate improvement to be constructed by County Assessment District 159. The roadway improvement plans for the ultimate configurations will be provided· Prepare a Signing and Striping plan to accommodate interim Traffic Signal. All plans will need to be prepared on electronic media compatible with standard AutoCAD software. Submit the project packet to the City of Temecula, Traffic Division, for review prior to initial submittal to CALTRANS. Submit to Caltrans for review and approval. Respond to CALTRANS plan check comments in order to receive project approval. Obtain a County of Riverside Cooperative Agreement, CALTRANS Cooperative Maintenance Agreement and a Caitrans Encroachment Permit· r:\ffp%034\grover.agrlajp EXHIBIT "B" PAYMENT SCHEDULE HOURLY RATES FOR BRW/TRANSPORTATION GROUP BY EMPLOYEE CLASSIFICATION AFRIL 1, 19oA CLASSIFICATION HOURLY RATE Principal $120.00 Vice President 115,00 Se~oz Associate 100.00 Associate 95.00 Seni~ Consu/tant 80.00 Consultant I 50.00 Staff Level V 6Z50 5t~ff I_~v~l I 27.50 r:%rlp%O34~.grover.mgr/ajp PROFESSIONAL SERVIC;:S This Agreement was made and entered into this 28th day of February, 1995, by and between the City of Temecula ("City"), a municipal corporation, and Albert Grover and Associates, an individual ('Consultant'). The parties hereto mutually agree as follows: Services. Consultant shall perform the tasks set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Cormultant shall complete the tasks according to the schedule set forth in Exhibit 'A". Performance. Consultant shall at all times, faithfully, industrially and to the best of his ability, experience and talent, perform all tasks described herein. 8 Payment. The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, at the hourly rates set forth in Exhibit "B" attached hereto, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. This amount will not exceed $5,230.00 for the total term of the Agreement unless additional payment is approved by the City Council; provided that the City Manager may approve additional payment not to exceed ten percent (10%) of the Agreement; but in no event more than $10,000.00. Consultant will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed. Invoices shall be submitted on or about the first business day of each month, for services provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice. Amendments. This Agreement may be amended so long as such amendment is in writing and agreed upon by both the City Council and Consultant. 8 OwnersNo of Documents. Upon satisfactory completion of or in the event of termination, suspension or abandonment of this Agreement, all original documents, designs, drawings, and notes prepared in the course of providing the services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission of the Consultant. Termination. The City may terminate this Agreement without cause so long as written notice of intent to terminate is given to Consultant at least three (3) days prior to the termination date. In the event of termination, Consultant shall be paid for the services performed. Indemnificaffi)n. The Consultant agrees to indemnify and save harmless the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, losses, defense cost, or liability of any kind or nature which the City, its officers, agents and employees may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of Consultant's acts or omissions under the terms of this Agreement, excepting only liability arising out of the sole negligence of the City. -1 ' r:'trfp'tO35%grover.egrlajp 10. 11. Status of Consultant. Consultant is an independent contractor in all respects in the performance of this Agreement and shall not be considered an employee of the City for any purpose. No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for performing services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder. Term. This Agreement shell commence on February 28, 1995, and shall remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than February 28.1996. I:)efe,at. In the event that Cortsultant is in default for cause under the terms of this - Agreement, the City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work performed after the date of default. Default shall include not performing the tasks described herein to the reasonable satisfaction of the City Manager of the City. Failure by the Consultant to make progress in the performance of work hereunder, if such failure arises out of causes beyond his control, end without fault or negligence of the Consultant, shall not be considered a default. Any disputes regarding performance, default or other matters in dispute between the City and the Consultant arising out of this Agreement or breech thereof, shall be resolved by arbitration. The arbitrator's decision shall be final. Consultant shall select an arbitrator from a list provided by the City of three retired judges of the Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services, Inc. The arbitration hearing shall be conducted according to California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1280, etHo. City and Consultant shall share the cost of the arbitration equally. Notices. Notices shall be given pursuant to this Agreement by personal service on the party to be notified, or by written notice upon such party deposited in the custody of the United States Postal Service addressed as follows: City: Attention: City Manager City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 bo Consultant: Albert Grover and Associates 211 East Imperial Highway, Suite 208 Fullerton, California 92635 The notices shell be deemed to have been given as of the date of personal service, or three (3) days after the date of deposit of the same in the custody of the United States Postal Service. -2- r:\rfp%035~,grover.eOrlajP 12. 13. Entire Aereement. This Agreement and any documents or instrument attached hereto or referred to herein integrate all terms and conditions mentioned herein or incidental hereto supersede all negotiations and prior writing in respect to the subject matter hereof. In the event of conflict between the terms, conditions, or provisions of this Agreement and any such document or instrument, the terms and conditions of this Agreement shall prevail. Liabiliw. Except as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for performing services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder. Consultant agrees to indemnify, release and hold harmless the City, its officers, - agents, employees, and representatives for all claims or losses the City may suffer resulting from any negligent actions or omissions by Consultant. Consultant shall secure workers' compensation insurance. Upon request of Consultant, the City shall add Consultant to the City's workers' compensation policy and the Consultant shall reimburse the City for the cost of said insurance premiums. 14. Licenses. Consultant and subconsultant shall obtain all necessary licenses, including but not limited to, City Business Licenses. The parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date and year above written. CONSULTANT CITY OF TEMECULA By: By Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk -3- r:%rfp%O35~grover.egrlejp FXHIBIT "A" TASKS TO BE PERFORMED INTERIM TRAFFIC SIGNAL State Route 79{S) at Pala Road Prepare a detailed list of the items of work to be performed by the consultant. Conduct an investigation to confirm existing roadway geometrics and utility locations. Prepare an Interim Traffic Signal plan, Project Cover Sheet, on City title block. The roadway improvement plans for the ultimate configurations will be available. Prepare a Signing and Striping plan to accommodate for the interim Traffic Signal. All plans will need to be prepared on electronic media compatible with AutoCAD, Series 12, software. Prepare a construction cost estimate for implementing your traffic signal and striping and signing plans. Submit the project packet to the City of Temecula, Traffic Division, for review prior to initial submittal to CALTRANS. Respond to all CALTRANS plan check comments. Prepare all documents required for a Caltrans Encroachment Permit submittal. r:~rfp~034\grover .agrlejp EXHIBIT "B" PAYMENT SCHEDULE ALBERT SCHEDULE OF HOURLY RATES EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 1993 Principal Associate Vice president/Senior Engineer Director of Project Development Senior Design Engineer Senior Transportation Engineer Resident Engineer Design Engineer Transportation Engineer Construction Inspector Assistant Engineer Designer Assistant Transportation Engineer Systems Analyst Senior CADD Operator Engineering Technician H CADD Operator Clerical/Engineering Technician I Traffic Enumerator/Engineering Aide Expert Wimess - Principal Expert Wimess - Vice President Subcomultants will be billed at cost plus 12% $ 140.00 $ 110.00 $ I10.00 $ I10.00 $ 100.00 $ 90.00 $ 90.00 $ 85.00 $ 80.00 $ 75.00 $ 75.00 $ 60.00 $ 5S.00 $ 50.00 $ 45.OO $ 45.00 $ 40.00 $ 4O.OO $ 35.00 $ 200.00 $ 150.00 Att~dance at Evening (6:00 p.m. or later) Meeting, Hearings, ~c. will b~ billed at 150% of the hourly ate. Conditions of Usaee: Iht above rates are typically effective for a 12 month period, bat AGA mainatin.v the ritht W change the billing rates at any time for convenience of record ktepin8. Therefore, all billings will aiwayz be at the then current billing rates. This will not affect any agreed upon total or not-to-acted fees. INVOICES WILL BE SUBMri-i b.D MONTHLY AND SHALL BE DUE AND pAYABLE WrrHIN ~0 DAYS. FINANCE CHARGES WILL BE ACCRUED DAILY ON UNPAID BALANCES BASED ON A 10% ANNUAL PERCENTAGE RATE. r:\rfp%O34\Orover.eclr/ejO PROFFSSIONAL SFRVICFS This Agreement was made and entered into this 28th day of February, 1995, by and between the City of Temecula ("City"), a municipal corporation, and Transtech, a California Corporation ("Consultant*). The parties hereto mutually agree as follows: Services. Consultant shall parform the tasks set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Consultant shall complete the tasks according to the schedule set forth in Exhibit "A". Performance. Consultant shall at all times, faithfully, industrially and to the best of his ability, experience and talent, parform all tasks described herein. Payment. The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, at the hourly rates set forth in Exhibit "B" attached hereto, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. This amount will not exceed $ 5,065.00 for the total term of the Agreement unless additional payment is approved by the City Council; I)rovided that the City Manager may approve additional payment not to exceed ten percent (10%) of the Agreement; but in no event more than ~10,000.00. Consultant will submit invoices monthly for actual services parformed. Invoices shall be submitted on or about the first business day of each month, for services provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice. Amendments. This Agreement may be amended so long as such amendment is in writing and agreed upon by both the City Council and Consultant. e Ownsr~hio of Documents. Upon satisfactory completion of or in the event of termination, suspension or abandonment of this Agreement, all original documents, designs, drawings, and notes prepared in the course of providing the services to be parformed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission of the Consultant. Termination, The City may terminate this Agreement without cause so long as written notice of intent to terminate is given to Consultant at least three (3) days prior to the termination date. In the event of termination, Consultant shall be paid for the services performed. Indemnification. The Consultant agrees to indemnify and save harmless the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, losses, defense cost, or liability of any kind or nature which the City, its officers, agents and employees may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of Consultant'a acts or omissions under the terms of this Agreement, excepting only liability arising out of the sole negligence of the City. -1 - r:~rfp%O36%transteo.agrl,,jp 10. 11. Status of Consultant. Consultant is an independent contractor in all respects in the performance of this Agreement and shall not be considered an employee of the City for any purpose. No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for performing services hereunder for City, City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder. Term. This Agreement shall commence on February 28, 1995, and shall remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than February 28, 1996. Default. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under the terms of this- Agreement, the City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work performed after the date of default. Default shall include not performing the tasks described herein to the reasonable satisfaction of the City Manager of the City. Failure by the Consultant to make progress in the performance of work hereunder, if such failure arises out of causes beyond his control, and without fault or negligence of the Consultant, shall not be considered a default. Any disputes regarding performance, default or other matters in dispute between the City and the Consultant arising out of this Agreement or breech thereof, shall be resolved by arbitration. The arbitrator's decision shall be final. Consultant shall select an arbitrator from a list provided by the City of three retired judges of the Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services, Inc. The arbitration hearing shall be conducted according to California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1280, et sea. City and Consultant shall share the cost of the arbitration equally. Notices. Notices shall be given pursuant to this Agreement by personal service on the party to be notified, or by written notice upon such party deposited in the custody of the United States Postal Service addressed as follows: City: Attention: City Manager City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 Consultant: Transtech 555 South Rancho Santa Fe Road, Suite 202 San Marcos, California 92069 The notices shall be deemed to have been given as of the date of personal service, or three (3) days after the date of deposit of the same in the custody of the United States Postal Service. -2- r:%rfp\036\transtec .agrlajp 12. Entire Aoreement. This Agreement and any documents or instrument attached hereto or referred to herein integrate all terms and conditions mentioned herein or incidental hereto supersede all negotiations and prior writing in respect to the subject matter hereof. In the event of conflict between the terms, conditions, or provisions of this Agreement and any such document or instrument, the terms and conditions of this Agreement shall prevail. 13. LiabiliW. Except as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for performing services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder. Consultant agrees to indemnify, release and hold harmless the City, its officers,.. agents, employees, and representatives for all claims or losses the City may suffer resulting from any negligent actions or omissions by Consultant. 14. Consultant shall secure workers' compensation insurance. Upon request of Consultant, the City shall add Consultant to the City's workers' compensation policy and the Consultant shall reimburse the City for the cost of said insurance premiums. Licenses. Consultant and subconsultant shall obtain all necessary licenses, including but not limited to, City Business Licenses. The parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date and year above written, CONSULTANT CITY OF TEMECULA By: By Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk -3- r:%rfp%036%transtec .egrlajp EXHIBIT "A" TASKS TO BE PERFORMED INTERIM TRAFFIC SIGNAL State Route 79(S) at La Paz Street 2. 3. 4. Prepare a detailed list of the items of work to be performed by the consultant. Conduct an investigation to confirm existing roadway geometrics and utility locations. Prepare an Interim Traffic Signal plan, Project Cover Sheet, on City title block. Prepare a Signing and Striping plan to accommodate for the interim Traffic Signal. All plans will need to be prepared on electronic media compatible with AutoCAD, Version 12, software. Prepare a construction cost estimate for implementing your traffic signal and striping & signing plans. Submit the project packet to the City of Temecula, Traffic Division, for review prior to initial submittal to CALTRANS. Respond to all CALTRANS and City of Temecula plan check comments. Prepare all documents required for a Caltrans Encroachment Permit submittal. r:%rfp~O34'~grover.agrlejP EXHIBIT "B" PAYMENT SCHEDULE Billing Rate Schedule C~'AsStFIrATION PRO~F, CT MANAGEIt PROJECT BNGINEER ~ENIOR ENGLNF, ER TRANSPORTATtONICIVIL BNGINEER SEN~OR D~IGN ENGINBI~'R DESIGN BNGINEER TRANSPORTATION ANALYST SENIOR DESIGNBR INSPECFOR CADD DRAFTER DESIGNER DRAFrB~GX~G TECIaN~CIAN CLERICAL ltOURt. Y RAT~ $90.00 S80.00 $70.00 $60.00 $70.00 $60.00 $SS .00 $5:5.00 $50.00 S50.00 $45,00 $40.00 S35.00 Reimtmrsables for deliveries, printing, reproduction, copying and duplicating shall be at cost plus ten (10) percent. Coordination and administration of subcontracted servic=s will be at a ten (10) percent fee. Travel costs ate charged at local prevailing rates. r:%rfp%O34%grover.egrlajp ITEM 12 APPROVAL E~ CITYATtORNEY FINANCE OFFI CITY MANAG CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Council Mary Jane McLarney, Assistant City Manager :; February 28, 1995 Temecula Community Partnership RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 95-._ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA TO ADOPT AND SUPPORT THE PREVENTION GOALS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP. BACKGROUND: The Temecula Community Partnership is a coalition of both public and private organizations within the Temecula Community joining in the effort to promote the development of Iong- range, comprehensive, community-wide drug use and alcohol abuse prevention planning and program development. To increase Community awareness of drug abuse and prevention, the following programs have been implemented: Community Forums on Drugs and Youth Neighborhoods In Action Parent Education Trainings Community Resource Directory Designated Driver Button Program Reading Buddies Volunteer Program Licensee Education on Alcohol and Drugs Prevention Expo (in conjunction with the Temecula Valley Friendship Games) Drug-Free Workplace Program McGruff Truck Child Safety Program Resource Library (videos, pamphlets and materials) The Temecula Community Partnership has asked that the City adopt the attached resolution in support of the program. In addition, the Assistant City Manager and Police Chief for the City serve on the Board of Directors for the Community Partnership. R:~JLNIEN)A'~TAFFO.M]S The City is a designated drug-free workplace and has a substance abuse and prevention program. In addition, an Employee Assistance Program (EAP) is offered to provide assistance to employees and their families if the need arises. FISCAL IMPACT: None. R:~AN~DA~TAR:6.M~ ~ RESOLUTION NO. 9~._ A RESOLIH'ION OF THE C1TY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECUIA TO ADOFF AND SlIPPORT ~ PREVENTION GOALS OF THE TEVIECULA CO~ PARTNERSHIP. Wm~F~&S, the City of Temecula hereby resolves to support the following prevention goals of the Temecula Community Partnership; 1. 2. 3. Increase the re~i_'llency and protr, ctive factors with youth and with families and communities to reduce the use of alcohol and other drugs. 4. Coordinate and integrate community-wide agencies into a comprehensive, multilevel program. 5. Increase the availability and accessib~ of prevention services for youth. 6. Implement, evaluate, and disseminate a *Uansponable model" program that other communitie~ can' adopt/adapt to praytat abuse of alcohol and other drugs. WHERe&S, the City Of Temecula further resolves to support the accomplishment of the aforementioned goals through participation in the prevention planning and program development activities; 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. federal dollars cease. 6. Encourage employees to participate in Parmership activities and trainings. Decrease the use of alcohol and other drugs by youth and adults. Reduce the risk factors for using alcohol and other drugs in the individual andTM Disseminate information about Partnership activities. Attend semi-annual coalition meetings. Serve on family, school or community phnning committees. Implement a. Drag-Free Workplace policy/program. Help develop a self-sustaining funding program to continue project initiatives once PASSI~, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of February, 1995. Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk, CMC STATE OF CAIXFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE)SS CITY OF TEMECULA) I June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula DO I:r~]gRy CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: day of February, 1995 by the following vote, to COUNTERS: COUNTERS: COUNCK34~MBERS: June S. Greek, City Clerk, CMC RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMFLULA TO ADOPT AND 8UI'PORT THE PREVENTION GOALS OF THE TIi~!ECULA COMMUNITY PAR~. W!n~REAS, the City of Temecula hereby resolves to support the following prevention goals of the Temecula Community Partnership; 1. Decrease the use of alcohol and other drugs by youth and adults. 2. Reduce the risk factors for ~ng alcohol and other drugs in the individual and '. environment. 3. Increase the resiliency and protective factors with youth and with families and communities to reduce the use of alcohol and other drugs. 4. Coordinate and integrate community-wide agencies inW a comprehensive, multilevel program. 5. Increase the availability and accessibility of prevention services for youth. 6. Implement, evaluate, and disseminate a "transportable model" program that other communities can adopt/adapt to prevent abuse of alcohol and other drugs. WBEB.EA$, the City of Temecula further resolves to support the accomplishment of the aforementioned goals through participation in the prevention pls~nning and program dev~opment activities; 1. Disseminate information about Parmership activities. 2. Attend semi-annual coalition meetings. 3. Serve on family, school or community planning committees. 4. Implement a Drug-Free Workplace policy/program. 5. Help develop a self-sust3_ining funding program to continue project initiatives once federal dollars cease. 6. Encourage employees to participate in Partnership activities and trainings. Section 1. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVEB AND ADOFrED by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the day of February, 1995. Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk, CMC [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE)SS CITY OF TEMECULA) I June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula DO ~Ry CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: day of February, 199S by the following vote, to COUNC~ERS: COUNC~ERS: COUNCu-MEMBERS: June S. Greek, City Clerk, CMC ITEM 13 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROV CITY ATTORNEY~ FINANCE OFFICE CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning February 28, 1995 Planning Application No. PA94-0062, Pulte Home Corp. Prepared By: Saied Naaseh, Associate Planner RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council: 1. Read by title only and introduce an Ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 95- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 213, AMENDMENT NO. 2 (PA94-0062); AMENDING SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 213 TO CHANGE THE ZONING FOR PLANNING AREA 11 (32 ACRES) FROM VERY HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (14-20 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE WITH A MAXIMUM OF 360 MULTI- FAMILY DWELLINGS) TO MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL {2-5 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE 'WITH A MAXIMUM OF 150 SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS), LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF TOWN VIEW AVENUE AND MURRIETA HOT SPRINGS ROAD. BACKGROUND The proposed project is an amendment to Specific Plan No. 213. This amendment eliminates 360 multi-family units in Planning Area 11, replaces them with 150 single family dwellings, and sets the Zoning and Development Standards to develop these houses. This amendment pre-zones Planning Area 11 which may be annexed to the City at a later date. Since Planning Area 11 is not contiguous to the City Limits, more property within the Silver Hawk Specific Plan needs to be annexed to the City with the annexation of this Planning Area. The Planning Commission recommended approval of this item to the City Council at their January 23, 1995 meeting with a 4-1 vote with Commissioner Blair casting the dissenting vote. All Commissioners were in support of the project; however, Commissioner Blair was not in favor of deleting Condition No. 13 that required the developer to reach an agreement with the School District prior to effectiveness of the Specific Plan. R:\STAFFRPT\62PA94.CC 2/21/95 ktb 1 DISCUSSION The Planning Commission had questions regarding how this project will impact the City's Housing Element, the Quimby Fees the project is required to pay, the side yard setbacks, the minimum lot sizes, the proposed zoning designation, and school mitigation. Staff provided the following explanations to the Commission's questions: · The project will not impact the Housing Element; however, future down zoning from multi-family to single family residences may have impacts on the Housing Element. The project will pay Quimby Fees consistent with the City's Quimby Fee Ordinance (5 acres per 1000) similar to the County standard at 'the time of the initial project approval. The side yard setbacks for the project are not to be less than 10 percent of the width of the lot. In no case shall the setback is less than three (3) feet and it need not exceed 5 feet. Encroachment to the side yards may be allowed consistent with the Specific Ran Zoning Standards. The proposed zoning designation for Planning Area 11 was Low Medium Density Residential with a range of 4-7 dwelling units per acre and a target density of 4.7 dwelling units per acre. This proposed designation caused some confusion among the Commissioners; therefore, Staff has recommended to change this designation to Medium Density Residential with a range of 2-5 dwelling units per acre and a target density of 4.7 dwelling units per acre. This designation will not change the merits of project and still limits the number of dwelling units to 150. The Specific Plan was originally approved by the County with a condition to mitigate school impacts by reaching an agreement with the School District at the time of reviewing the tract maps. In light of the approval of the School Mitigation Resolution by the Planning Commission, Staff recommended Condition No. 13 to the Planning Commission. Condition No. 13 reads as follows: Approval of the Silver Hawk Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 is contingent upon and shall not become effective, nor shall it vest, until the applicant has reached and recorded a binding mitigation agreement with the Temecula Valley Unified School District to ensure the mitigation of the new students generated by this project if the City Council adopts the School Mitigation Resolution as recommended for approval by the .Planning Commission. Refer to the Temecula Valley Unified School District letter dated January 13, 1995. At the Planning Commission hearing the applicant requested deleting the Condition since there are provisions that make this project exempt for the Resolution, The Assistant City Attorney recommended deleting Condition No. 13 since the originally approved Condition of Approval by the County which requires the applicant to mitigate the impacts to the School District at the development application stage in accordance R:\STAFFRPT\62PAg/,,CC 2/21/95 ktb 2 with the District policies in effect at the time of tract submittal still applies to the project. Commissioner Blair opposed deleting Condition No. 13 since the City Council had not taken an action on the Resolution and deleting the Condition would be premature as the final form of the Resolution was not known. FISCAL IMPACT A Fiscal Impacts Analysis will be provided for City Council review with the Annexation application. Attachments: Ordinance No. 95- - Page 4 Exhibit A of Ordinance No. 95-' (Conditions of Approval) - Page 8 Planning Commission Staff Report, January 23, 1995 - Page 13 R:\STAFFRPT\6?.PAg/,.CC 2/21/95 ktb 3 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 ORDINANCE NO. 95- R:\STAFFRPT\62PAgA..CC 2/21/95 ktb 4 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 ORDINANCE NO. 95- AN ORDINANCE OF THE C1TY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING SPF. C~IC PlAN NO. 213, AMENDMENT NO. 2 ~G APPLICATION NO. 94-4)62) AMENDING SPECIHC PLAN NO. 213 TO CHANGE THE ZONING FOR PLANNING AREA 11 (32 ACRF_S) FROM VERY HIGHDENS1TY RESIDENTIAL (14-20 DWrJJJNG UNITS PER ACRE WITH A MAXiMUIVI OF 360 MULTI- FAlVHLY DW~JJJNGS) TO MEnRIM DENSITY RESID~ (25 DWELLING UNITS FER ACRE WITH A ~ OF lS0 SINGLE FAMilY DW~-LL~NGS), LOCATEB ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF TOWN VIEW AVENUE AND MURB~A HOT SPRINGS ROAD. WiP~REAS, Pulte Home Corp. filed PA94-0062 in accordance with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference; WIIERF_AS, Pulte Home Corp. has filed a request with the Local Agency Formation Commission of Riverside County to annex the subject sites to the City of Temecula and has requested the City through its application PA94-0062 to pre-zone the subject site prior to its annexation; WITERF-A,S, said Specific Plan Amendment application was processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local hw; Wi~EREAS, the Planning Commission considered said Specific Plan Amendment on January 23, 1995 at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commission recommended approval of said Specific Plan Amendment; WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing pertaining to said Specific Plan Amendment on February 28, 1995, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition to said Specific Plan Amendment; WHEREAS, the City Council received a copy of the Commission proceedings and Staff Report regarding the Specific Plan Amendment; NOW, THInEFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ~ DOES ORDAIN AS FOT,T~OWS: R:\STAFFRPT\62PA9~.CC 2/21/95 ktb 5 Section 1. FindinV~. That the Temecula City Council hereby makes the following fmdings: A. The City' Council in aimproving the proposed Specific Plan Amendment, makes the following findings, to wit: 1. The project is consistent with the applicable General plan. 2. The project is compatible with surrounding land uses which are future residential and commercial developments. 3. The project site is located within the City's Sphere of Influence. 4. Mitigation measures in Bnvironmental Impact Report for Specific Plan No. 213 will reduce the impacts of the project. 5. The site of the proposed project is suitable to accommodate the land uses permitted in Specific Plan No. 213 due to the fact that the development standards and Conditions of Approval proposed within the Specific Plan and the mitigation measures within the FBIR ensure orderly development of the site. 6. Said findings are supported by analysis, maps, exhibits, and environmental documents associated with this application and herein incorporated by n,*ference. Section 2. Environmental Compliance. According to Section 15182 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, no further environmental analysis is required for this pwject since an Environmental Impact Report was previously certified by the County. Section 3. Conditioa~. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby appwves Amendment No. 2 to Specific Plan No. 213 (PA94-(K)62) to change the ZOning for Planning Area ll (32 acres) from Very High Density Residential (14-20 units per acre with a maximum of 360 multi-family .dwellings) to Medium Density Residential (2-5 dwelling units per acre with a maximum of 150 single family dwellings), located on the southwest corner of Town View Avenue and Murrieta Hot Springs Road, as more specifically and set forth in PA94-0062, and subject to the Conditions set forth in Exhibit A to this Ordinance and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 4. This Ordinance shall he in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. The City Clerk shall publish a summary of thi.~ Ordinance and a certified copy of the full text of this Ordinance shall be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five days prior to the adoption of this Ordinance. Within 15 days from adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance, together with the names of the Councilmembers voting for and against the Ordinance, and post the same in the office of the City Clerk. R:\STAFFRPT\62PA96.CC 2/21/95 k~b 6 Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTEll this 28th day of February, 1995. Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk [SSAL] STATE OF CALIFO~) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss crrY OF TEMECULA) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing ~ce No. 95-__ was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 28th day of Febnmry, 1995, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed a regular meeting of the City Council on the 14th day of March, 1995 by the following roll call vote: COUNCILlVIItVIBlt~S: NOES: COUNCK2ViEMBERS: COUNTERS: June S. Greek, City Clerk R:\STAFFRPT\62PAW,.CC 2121/95 ktb 7 EXHIBIT A TO ORDINANCE NO. 95- , CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL R:\STAFFRPT\62PA9Z,.CC 2/21/95 ktb 8 EXHIBIT A TO ORDINANCE NO. 95- , CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR PA94-0062 CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Silver Hawk Specific Plan Amendment- Planning Application No. 94-0062 Project Description: A request for approval of Amendment No. 2 of Specific Plan No. 213, Silver Hawk, by changing the zoning of Planning Area 11 from Very High Density Residential (14-20 dwelling units per acre with a maximum of 360 multi- family dwellings) to Medium Density Residential (2-5 dwelling units per acre with a maximum of 150 single family dwellings) and establishing Zoning and Development Standards to '. allow the development of 150 single family dwellings. Assessor's Parcel No.: Approval Date: 914-2604)59 AND 914-260-062 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Seventy-Eight Dollars ($78.00) County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15094 15062. General Conditions e The developer/applicant shall indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless, the City and any agency or instrumentality thereof, and/or any of its officers, employees and agents from any and all claims, actions, or proceedings against the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its officers, employees and agents, to attack, set aside, void, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting from an approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Specific Plan Amendment which action is brought within the appropriate statute of limitations period and Public Resources Code, Division 13, Chapter 4 (Section 21000 et seo., including but not by the way of limitations Section 21152 and 21167). City shall promptly notify the developer/applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding brought within this time period. City shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. Should the City fail to either promptly notify or cooperate fully, developer/applicant shall not, thereafter be responsible to indemnify, defend, protect, or hold harmless the City, any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its officers, employees, or agents· R:\STAFFRPT\62PA94.CC 2/21/95 ktb 9 e 10. 11. 12. 13. All development within this site shall be in accordance with the requirements of Development Agreement No. 9, including all City ordinances applicable under the terms of Development agreement No. 9. All Iondoooping oholl bo oonaiotont with tho Wator Effioiont Landooaping Ordinonoo. This project and all subsequent projects within the site shall comply with all mitigation measures identified in the Final Environmental Impact Report unless modified by the Conditions of Approval. Prior to issuance of grading permits, approval of development permits, recordation of final maps, issuance of building permits and issuance of occupancy permits for any subsequent projects or activities within the site, the applicant/developer shall demonstrate by submittal of a wdtten report that all mitigation measures identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program-within the FEIR have been satisfied for the stage of development that permits are being issued for. The developer or the developer's successor-in-interest shall be responsible for maintaining the undeveloped portion of the site including weed abatement and litter removal. The applicant shall deposit sufficient funds with the City of Temecula to retain the services of a qualified consultant to administer and implement the Mitigation Monitoring Program approved for this project as part of the Environmental Impact Report prepared for Silver Hawk in compliance with Assembly Bill 3180. If any of these conditions of approval differ from the Specific Plan text or map exhibits or any other documents, the conditions enumerated her. in shall take precedence. Any proposed amendment to this Specific Plan shall require public hearings end review by the Planning Commission and City Council, and/or shall be reviewed in accordance with such rules and regulations for the review of Specific Plan Amendments as may have been adopted by the City and which are in effect at the time of any proposed amendment is submitted. The developer, Assessment DistriCt 161 or Community Facilities District 88-4 shall be responsible to pay all the costs associated with providing the necessary infrastructure for the project. The City of Temecula shall not be responsible to pay for any necessary infrastructure improvements associated with this project. A Mitigation Monitoring Program shall be submitted prior to approval of any implementing applications. Approval of the Silver I lawk Spooifie Plan Amondmont No. 2 ia oontingont upon and ohall not booomo offootivo, nor oholl it root, until tho opplioont hoe rooohod and rooordod o binding mitigation agroomont with tho Tomooula Volloy Unifiod S;ohool Dietriot to onouro tho mitigation of tho now otudonta gonoratod by thio projoot if tho City Counoil adopts tho ~ohool Mitigation Reoolution oe rooommondod for approval by the Planning Commi~3ion. Refor to tho Tomooula Valloy Unifiod 8ohool Di,3triot lottar datod January 13, 1001~. (Deleted by Planning Commission on January 23, 1995) R:\STAFFRPT\62PAg~.CC 2/21/95 ktb 10 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS The following are the Department of Public Works Conditions of Approval for this project, and shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the appropriate staff person of the Department of Public Works. It is understood' that the Developer correctly shows on the tentative site plan all existing and proposed easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and revision. General Requirements 14. The additional access on Murrieta Hot Springs Road has not been reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works and should not be considered a part of ' this Specific Plan Amendment. In order for the Department of Public Works to support this additional access to Murrieta Hot Springs Road, subsequent Traffic Studies will be required. 15. All street sections shall correspond with Typical Roadway Cross Sections and requirements of the Circulation Element of the City's General Plan, City Ordinances and standards. COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT 16. Pursuant to the City's park land dedication requirements (Quimby), the developer or his successor(s), shall enter into an agreement and post bonds to dedicate park land, or pay the appropriate in-lieu fee, prior to recordation of each respective final map. 17. All park facilities, and/or other recreational areas, intended for transfer to the City "in- fee" shall be dedicated free and clear of any liens, assessments, or easements that would preclude the City from using the property for public park and/or recreational purposes. A policy of title insurance and a soils assessment report shall also be provided with the dedication of the property. 18. All park facilities, slope areas, parkway landscaping, trails and medians shall be improved in conformance with the City of Temecula Landscape Development Plan Guidelines and Specifications. 19. Bike lanes and recreational trails shall be designed to intercept with the City's Park and Recreation Master Plan. Class II bike lanes shall be constructed in concurrence with the with the street improvements. 20. Construction of the public park sites, landscaping, trails and medians proposed for dedication to the City sham commence pursuant to a pre-job meeting with the developer and the City Maintenance Superintendent. Failure to comply with the City's review and inspection process may preclude acceptance of these areas into the City's maintenance program. R:\STAFFRPT\62PAgA.CC 2/21/95 k(b 11 21. 22. 23. 24. The developer, or his successor(s), shall maintain all perk facilities, landscaping, trails and medians until such time as those responsibilities are accepted by the City. All perimeter walls, interior slopes, and open space shall be maintained by the individual property owner(s) or an established Home Owners' Association (HOA). All parks, slope areas, parkway landscaping, trails and medians, identified as City maintenance areas, shall be offered for dedication on the final map. Landscape construction drawings for all project areas (slopes, streetscape, medians, trails and parks) proposed for dedication to the City shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Services prior to recordation of each respective final map. R:\STAFFRPT\62'PAW,.CC Z/Z1/95 ktb 12 ATTACHMENT NO. 3 EXHIBITS R:'~STAFFRPT%62PA94.PC 1 I19/95 en 15 CITY OF TEMECULA ~I / / .... +___ I I I ,,. ',TEMEC "SITE HOll Plaids I f I f f CASE NO. - PA94-0062 EXHIBIT- A PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - JANUARY 23, 1995 VICINITY MAP R:~'TAFFRFT%62PA94.PC 1112/95 CITY OF TEMECULA ~'~ M t H/C~' HUN~ER RD i_. i-,L_' M ~cj .cc } RH O !,1,1 _1 CASE NO. - PA94-0062 ,.F-XHisrr- s GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ~,NNING COMMISSION DATE - JANUARY 23, 1995 R:\STAFFFlaT~62PA94.PC 1 I13/95 an CITY OF TEMECULA ~-- · PU~LK~ FACILITY BITE CASE NO. - PA94-0062 EXHIBIT- C APPROVED SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE MAe-,, PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - JANUARY 23, 1995 R:%STAFFRP'T~2PA94.PC 1/13/95 mn A'I'I'ACHMENT NO. 3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT, JANUARY 23, 1995 R:\STAFFRPT\62PA9/,.CC 2/21/95 k[b 13 STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION January 23, 1995 Planning Application No. PA94-0062 Prepared By: Saied Naaseh RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Department Staff recommends the Planning Commission: RECOMMEND Adoption of Resolution No. 95- approving PA 94-0062, based upon the Analysis and Findings contained in the Staff Report and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. APPLICATION INFORMATION APPLICANT: Pulte Home Corporation REPRESENTATIVE: Sanford Edward PROPOSAL: A request for approval of Amendment No. 2 of Specific Plan No. 213, Silver Hawk, to change the zoning of Planning Area 11 from Very High Density Residential (14- 20 dwelling units per acre with a maximum of 360 multi- family dwellings) to Low Medium Density Residential (4-7 dwelling units par acre with a maximum of 150 single family dwellings) and establish Zoning and Development Standards to allow the development of 150 single family dwellings. This amendment will prazone this Planning Area which may be annexed to the City of Temecula along with other property within the Specific Ran at a future date. LOCATION: Southwest corner of Town View Avenue and Murrieta Hot Springs Road. EXISTING ZONING: Specific Plan (SP), Very High Density Residential (14-20 dwelling units per acre) R:~STAFFRPT~62PA94.PC 1 I19/95 an 1 SURROUNDING ZONING: North: South: East: West: Specific Plan (Town Center Commercial) Specific Plan (Medium High Density Residential, 5-8 dwelling units per acre) Specific Plan (Very High Density Residential 14-20 dwelling units per acre) Specific Plan (Open Space, Flood Control) PROPOSED ZONING: Specific Plan (Low Medium Residential, 4-7 dwelling units per acre) EXISTING GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Very High Density Residential (13-20 dwelling units per acre) PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: N/A EXISTING SWAP DESIGNATION: Specific Plan EXISTING LAND USE: VBcant SURROUNDING LAND USES: North: Vacant South: Vacant East: Vacant West: Vacant PROJECT STATISTICS The approved Silver Hawk Specific Plan area includes approximately 1042 acres and permits a maximum of 2478 dwelling units with a gross density of 2.37 dwelling units per acre. The proposed amendment reduces the total dwelling units by 210 to 2268. This decrease is due to the proposed reduction of multi-family units by 360 and addition of 150 single family dwellings to Planning Area 11. BACKGROUND The Silver Hawk Specific Plan is located outside the City Limits and within the City's Sphere of Influence. The Specific Plan was approved by the County Board of Supervisors in 1987. A subsequent amendment was also approved in 1988. This amendment included the Architectural and Landscaping Design Guidelines and the Zoning Standards. Specific Plan No. 213 and its subsequent amendments are vested by Development Agreement No. 9. According to Government Code Sections 65450 and 65330, the City may adopt Specific Plan Amendments outside of its City Limits and within its Sphere of Influence. The Specific Plan Amendment is a replacement for traditional zoning and establishes a pre-zoning of a property for future annexation to the City. This amendment does not become effective until the annexation becomes effective. Therefore, if Planning Area 11 is not annexed to the City, its zoning will remain Very High Density Residential (14-20 dwelling units per acre). R:~STAFFRPT%e2PA94.PC 1 I19/96 en 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed project is an amendment to Specific Plan No. 213. This amendment eliminates 360 multi-family units in Planning Area 11, replaces them with 150 single family dwellings, and sets the Zoning and Development Standards to develop these houses. This amendment pre-zones Planning Area 11 which may be annexed to the City at a later date along with more property within the Silver Hawk Specific Plan. ANALYSIS This amendment is essentially a down zoning of Planning Area 11 which eliminates 360 multi- family units in Planning Area 11 and replaces them with 150 single family dwellings. The applicant may annex any portion of the Silver Hawk Specific Plan that is contiguous to the City Limits without pre-zoning by filing an annexation application. However, since the applicant is requesting this down zoning, a pre-zoning of Planning Area 11 is necessary prior to filing for an annexation application. Therefore, the approval of this amendment paves the way for the potential future annexation of this Planning Area along with more property within the Silver Hawk Specific Plan. The approval of this amendment does not bind the City to annex this Planning Area or any other property within Silver Hawk. A separate annexation application has to be filed with the City. At that time, a Fiscal Impact Analysis will be prepared by the applicant to analyze impacts of this potential annexation on the City Budget. Moreover, a Property Tax Agreement will be signed between the City and the County before the annexation is complete. This agreement will specify the portion of the property tax that the City will receive from the County. Furthermore, at the time of annexation, the applicant needs to amend the Land Use Element of the City of Temecula General Plan. The current General Plan designation is High Density Residential (13-20 dwelling units per acre) which needs to be changed to Low Medium Density residential (3-6 dwelling units per acre). The City Attorney has determined that this amendment may be approved without the benefit of this General Plan Amendment since the pre-zoning of Planning Area 11 does not become effective until the annexation is approved. This down zoning from multi-family units to single family units may have impacts on the Housing Element of the City's General Plan. Again, just like the General Plan Amendment and the Fiscal Impact Analysis, this impact will be analyzed with the annexation application. The General Plan states: "The Housing Element is a comprehensive statement by the City of Temecula of its commitment to facilitate the provision of housing that meets the needs of existing and future residents. This commitment is in furtherance of the statewide housing goal to attain decent housing and suitable living environment for every California family, while remaining responsive to the unique concerns of the community." The approval of the annexation will result in a reduction in multi-family units; therefore, it has a potential impact on the Housing Element. The approved Silver Hawk Specific Plan committed only a total of eight (8) acres of parks on its Land Use Map. Since the eight (8) acres of parks do not meet the Quimby Act requirements, the County conditioned the underlying maps to pay fees to satisfy these requirements. This amendment has been conditioned to require the future maps to pay R:~.STAFFRPT~62PA94.PC 1 I19/95 en 3 Quimby Fees in accordance with the City's Quimby Ordinance, if the property is annexed to the City (refer to Condition 16). Staff received a letter from the School District requesting a mitigation agreement to be signed between the developer and the applicant prior to the public hearing. Staff has conditioned this project consistent with the Johnson Ranch Specific Plan (refer to Condition No. 13). EXISTING ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION The existing County zoning for the site is Specific Plan (Very High Density Residential). This amendment will change the zoning to Low Medium Residential and includes Zoning and Development Standards to ensure proper development of the site. The project is consistent with the applicable General Plan. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION According to Section 15182 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, no further environmental analysis is required for this project since an Environmental Impact Report was previously certified by the County. SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS The approval of this amendment will replace 360 multi-family dwellings with 150 single famRy dwellings and will pre-zone the property for possible future annexation. At the time of annexation, an amendment to the Land Use Element of the General Plan, a Fiscal Impact Analysis, a Property Tax Agreement with the County and an examination of the Housing Element of the General Plan will be necessary to implement the approval of this project. FINDINGS 1. The project is consistent with the applicable General Plan. The project is compatible with surrounding land uses which are future residential and commercial developments. 3. The project site is located within the City's Sphere of Influence. Mitigation measures in Environmental Impact Report for Specific Plan No. 213 will reduce the impacts of the project. The site of the proposed project is suitable to accommodate the land uses permitted in Specific Plan No. 213 due to the fact that the development standards and Conditions of Approval proposed within the Specific Plan and the mitigation measures within the FEIR ensure orderly development of the site. Said findings are supported by analysis, maps, exhibits, and environmental documents associated with this application and her.in incorporated by reference. R:~STAFFRPT~62PA94.PC 1119/95 an 4 Attachments: PC Resolution - Blue Page 6 Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 10 Exhibits - Blue Page 15 A. Vicinity Map B. General Plan Land Use C. Approved Specific Plan Land Use Map R:%STAFFRPT'%62PA94.PC 1 I19/95 sn 5 ATTACHMENT N0.1 PC RESOLUTION N0.95- R:%STAFFFia~e2PA94.PC 1119/95 en 6 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 PC RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING CO1VI1V!IgSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECO~ING APPROVAL OF AMEND1V~NT NO. 2 OF SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 213 (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 94-0062) PROPOSING CHANGING THE ZONING FOR PLANNING AREA 11 FROM VERY tlIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (1420 DW~.LLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW MEnlUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (4-7 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) AND SETTING ZONING AND DEVI~.LOPMENT STANDARDS TO ALLOW THE DEVELOPMENT OF ~ SINGLI~- FAMILY DWF-LLINGS. THIS AMENDMENT WILL PREZONE Tier PLANNING AREA W!~CH MAY BE ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF TEMF_EUIA ALONG WITH OTHER PROPERTY WITHIN THE SPECIFIC PLAN AT A FUTURE DATE. THE PROJECT IS LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF MURRIETA HOT SPRINGS ROAD AND TOWN VIEW AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 914-260-059 AND 914-260-062 WHEREAS, Pulte Home Corp. filed said application in accordance with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference and applicable State Laws; WHEREAS, said application was processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local hw; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered said application on January 23, 1995 at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commission recommended approval of said application; NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMIRSION OF THE CITY OF TI~VIECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Findings. That the Temecula Planning Commission hereby makes the following findings: A. The Planning Commission in recommending approval of said application makes the following findings, to wit: 1. The project is consistent with the applicable General Plan. 2. The project is compatible with surrounding land uses which are future residential and commercial developments. R:%STAFFRP'I~62PA94.PC 1 ll 9/95 an 7 3. The project site is located within the City's Sphere of Influence. 4. Mitigation measures in Environmental Impact Report for Specific Plan No. 213 will reduce the impacts of the project. 5. The site of the proposed project is suitable to accommodate the land uses permitted in Specific Plan No. 213 due to the fact that the development standards and Conditions of Approval proposed within the Specific Plan and the mitigation measures within the FEIR ensure orderly development of the site. 6. Said findings are supported by analysis, maps, exhibits, and environmental documents associated with this application and herein incorporated by reference. B. As conditioned pursuant to Section 3. Seaion 2. l=-nvironmental Compliance. According to Section 15182 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines no further environmental analysis is required for this project since an Environmental Impact Report was previously certified by the County. Section 3. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby recommends approval of Amendment No. 2 of Specific Plan No. 213 (Planning Application No. 94- 0062) located on the southwest corner of Town View and Murrieta Hot Springs Road. A. Attachment No. 2, attached hereto. Section 4. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOFrED this 23rd day of January, 1995. STEVEN I. FORD CHAIRMAN R:%STAFFFIPT~e2PA94.PC 1 I19/95 an 8 I I~ZRF.,BY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 23rd day of January, 1995 by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: G~Y~ORNHILL S~RET~Y R:~,STAFFRFT"~62PAg,4.PC 1 119/95 an 9 ATTACHMENT NO. 2 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL R:~STAFFRPT'~62PA94.PC 1119/95 .n 10 ATTACHMENT NO. 2 CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Silver Hawk Specific Plan Amendment- Planning Applicatien No. 94-0062 Project Description: A request for approval of Amendment No. 2 of Specific Plan No. 213, Silver Hawk, by changing the zoning of Planning Area 11 from Very High Density Residential { 14- 20 dwelling units per acre with a maximum of 360 multi- family dwellings) to Low. Medium Density Residential (4-7 dwelling units per acre with a maximum of 150 single-. fam~y dwe~ings) and establishing Zoning and Development Standards to allow the development of 150 single family dwellings. This amendment will prezone this Planning Area which may be annexed to the City of Temecula along with other property within the Specific Plan at a future date. Assessor's Parcel No.: Approval Date: 914-260-0 59 AND 914-260-062 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Seventy-Eight Dollars ($78.00) County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15094. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted herein shall be void by reason of failure of condition, Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c). General Conditions The developer/applicant shall indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless, the City and any agency or instrumentality thereof, and/or any of its officers, employees and agents from any and all claims, actions, or proceedings against the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its officers, employees and agents, to attack, set aside, void, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting from an approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Specific Plan Amendment which action is brought within the appropriate statute of limitations period and Public Resources Code, Division 13, Chapter 4 (Section 21000 et seo., including R:%STAFFRPT~62PA94.PC 1119/95 an 11 10. 11. but not by the way of limitations Section 21152 and 21167). City shall promptly notify the developer/applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding brought within this time period. City shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. Should the City fail to either promptly notify or cooperate fully, developer/applicant shall not, thereafter be responsible to indemnify, defend, protect, or hold harmless the City, any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its officers, employees, or agents. All development within this site shall be in accordance with the requirements of all City ordinances, except as expressly modified her. in, and State laws, and shall conform with the approved Specific Plan. Regulations or procedures not covered by the Specific Plan or appurtenant documents shall be subject to the City ordinances in effect at the time entitlement is required. All landscaping shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Landscaping Ordinance. This project and all subsequent projects within the site shall comply with all mitigation measures identified in the Final Environmental Impact Report unless modified by the Conditions of Approval. Prior to issuance of grading permits, approval of development permits, recordation of final maps, issuance of building permits and issuance of occupancy permits for any subsequent projects or activities within the site, the applicant/developer shall demonstrate by submittal of a written report that all mitigation measures identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program within the FEIR have been satisfied for the stage of development that permits are being issued for. The developer or. the developer's successor-in-interest shall be responsible for maintaining the undeveloped portion of the site including weed abatement and litter removal. The applicant shall deposit sufficient funds with the City of Temecula to retain the services of a qualified consultant to administer and implement the Mitigation Monitoring Program approved for this project as part of Environmental Impact Report for Silver Hawk in compliance with Assembly Bill 3180. If any of these conditions of approval differ from the Specific Plan text or map exhibits or any other documents, the conditions enumerated her. in shall take precedence. Any proposed amendment to this Specific Plan shall require public hearings and review by the Planning Commission and City Council, and/or shall be reviewed in accordance with such rules and regulations for the review of Specific Plan Amendments as may have been adopted by the City and which are in effect at the time of any proposed amendment is submitted. The developer or Assessment District 161 shall be responsible to pay all the costs associated with providing the necessary infrastructure for the project. The City of Temecula shall not be responsible to pay for any necessary infrastructure improvements associated with this project. R:%STAFFFI:r~62PA94,PC 1119/95 .n 12 12. A Mitigation Monitoring Program shall be submitted prior to approval of any implementing applications. 13. Approval of the Silver Hawk Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 is contingent upon and shall not become effective, nor shall it vest, until the applicant has reached and recorded a binding mitigation agreement with the Temecula Valley Unified School District to ensure the mitigation of the new students generated by this project if the City Council adopts the School Mitigation Resolution as recommended for approval by the Planning Commission. Refer to the Temecula Valley Unified School District letter dated January 13, 1995. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS The following are the Department of Public Works Conditions of Approval for this project, and shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions regarding the true- meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the appropriate staff person of the Department of Public Works. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the tentative site plan all existing and proposed easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and revision. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 14. The additional access on Murrieta Hot Springs Road has not been reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works and should not be considered a part of this Specific Plan Amendment. In order for the DPW to support this additional access to Murrieta Hot Springs Road, subsequent Traffic Studies will be required. 15. All street sections shall correspond with Typical Roadway Cross Sections and requirements of the Circulation Element of the City's General Plan, City ordinances and standards. COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT 16. Pursuant to the City's park land dedication requirements (Quimby), the developer or his successor(s), shall enter into an agreement and post bonds to dedicate park land, or pay the appropriate in-lieu fee, prior to recordation of each respective final map. 17. All park facilities, and/or other recreational areas, intended for transfer to the City "in- fee" shall be dedicated free and clear of any liens, assessments, or easements that would preclude the City from using the property for public park and/or recreational purposes. A policy of title insurance and a soils assessment report shall also be provided with the dedication of the property. 18. All park facilities, slope areas, parkway landscaping, trails and medians shall be improved in conformance with the City of Temecula Landscape Development Plan Guidelines and Specifications. 19. Bike lanes and recreational trails shall be designed to intercept will the City's Park and R:~STAFFRPT~62PA94.PC 1 119/95 en 13 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. Recreation Master Plan. Class II bike lanes shall be constructed in concurrence with the with the street improvements. Construction of the public park sites, landscaping, trails and medians proposed for dedication to the City shall commence pursuant to a pre-job meeting with the developer and the City Maintenance Superintendent. Failure to comply with the City's review and inspection process may preclude acceptance of these areas into the City's maintenance program. The developer, or his successor(s), shall maintain all park facilities, landscaping, trails and medians until such time as those responsibilities are accepted by the City. All perimeter walls, interior slopes, and open space shall be maintained by the individual property owner(s) or an established Home Owners' Association (HOA). All parks, slope areas, parkway landscaping, trails and medians, identified as City maintenance areas, shall be offered for dedication on the final map. Landscape construction drawings for all project areas (slopes, streetscape, medians, trails and parks) proposed for dedication to the City shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Services prior to recordation of each respective final map. R:%STAFFRPl~62PA94.PC 1 I19/95 en 14 January 13, 1995 TEMECULA VALLEY Unified School District SUPERINTENDENT Patricia B. Novotney, Ed.D. BOARD OF EDUCATION Rosle Van0erf~aak Baroara Tooker Lincla CamD0ell Dr. David Eunch Memoe, RiChard Shater Me<nee, Saied Naaseh, Associate Planner City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 SUBJECT: Planning area II Specffic Plan 213 (Pults) Dear Mr. Naaseh: The Temecula Valley Unifmd School District provides the following comments on the subject project, as you requested. School Facilities Mitigation Agreement The proposed development includes 150 residential units, generating the following approximate number of students: Elementary School: 58 Middle School: 36 High School: 38 Total 132 All existing school facilities near this project are at or over their permanent capacity. A signed mitigation agreement will be required between the developer and the School District in accordance with the Specific Plan No. 213 conditions of approval (see attachment), to ensure adequate facilities for these new students. Sidewalks Adequate sidewalks must be provided, for students who would walk to school or bus stops. The Temecula Valley Unified School District requests that the above issues be resolved prior to the public hearing. Director of Facilities Development CC: Patricia B. Novotney, Ed.D., Superintendent John Brooks, Assistant Superintendent Business Services Janet Dixon, Facilities Planning Analyst Sanford Edward, Master Plan Development 31350 Rancho Vista Road /Ternecula, CA 92592 / (909) 676-2661 Spe~tflc Flee Ito, 223 keel No. ~ L" SpNtfiC Plan Jig. 21! ANnamet IW. ! shall coastal of the fellertrig: ~'b. Exhibit abe: SDeCtffC Plea Carnations Of ApPrOval "348 and 444 end s'uSa le~s& Bad shall confine lubstantla11~fvt~h adoDied l~grs udtor t~ reqV~rmets se~ feKk by these agencies It the ~ ;lead CentFelt IM eh 12. lgll see Pay 1~. :1987 . fleltk gelermeet~ !. l,Firill i f~ ColIf,),/dlllellLrlthe Offtent ParCh ~, ~,988 : Tits Uhiell Selma1 O!lt,.* dlnulW IS, 1988 '~' 2~ % ell ~e the [1lieaPe mto~ Ht~h SchoOl Dill;rice and ~he Tell Uaton S~0:1 Olinrice Slmll be mitigated at, r, he loreleiwet appliesglen stale ; mcseedince wtl;h ~he DIll;rice policies 111 effl~ m~ Ca ttm of ~rac~ ' ~ eelillegal . ITEM 14 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROV CITY ATTORNEY~ FINANCE OFFICE CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning February 28, 1995 City of Temecula's Vendor's Ordinance Prepared By: Debbie Ubnoske, Senior Planner RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council: Adopt a Resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 95- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA MAKING CERTAIN RNDINGS IN CONNECTION WITH THE APPROVAL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA VENDOR'S ORDINANCE AND ADOPTING THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION. Introduce and read by title only an Ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 95- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA PERTAINING TO OUTDOOR VENDORS AND ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS FOR OUTDOOR VENDING. BACKGROUND The City of Temecula Vendor's Ordinance was unanimously recommended for approval by the Planning Commission on December 5, 1994. At the Planning Commission meeting, a number of comments were made by the Commissioners. These comments included: defining "developed' and "courtyard" and adding language to the Ordinance that: 1 ) requires property owners permission to operate a vending cart; 2) prohibits the sale of alcohol from the vending carts, unless it is a special event; 3) prohibiting flashing lights or other similar potentially "disturbing" lights on the carts; 4) requiring approvals\clearances from the Health Department if food is to be sold; and 5) prohibiting the maximum height of the standto eight (8) feet with no appurtenances exceeding the eight (8) feet height limit. These comments have all been incorporated into the Ordinance. R:XS'fAFFRF~V~qlX}R.ORD 2/21/95 Idb 1 Subsequent to the Planning Commission meeting, staff re-assessed the Iocational standards requiring vendors to locate in a "recognizable plaza or courtyard area." Staff feels this Iocational standard will preclude vendors from locating in areas that might be appropriate. Therefore, staff changed the Ordinance to read that vendors should locate in areas where there is "at least 200 square feet of useable area." RSCAL IMPACT While the exact fiscal impact is unknown at this time, it is anticipated that allowing vendors to locate in developed areas of the City will result in increased sales tax to the City. Attachments: 2. 3. 4. Resolution No. 95- - Page 3 Ordinance No. 95- - Page 7 Planning Commission Staff Report dated December 5, 1994 - Page 8 Planning Commission Staff Report dated November 7, 1994- Page 9 it:',S'rAFFRR~VBNlX)R.ORD 2/21/95 Idb 2 ATTACHMENT NO. ~ ~: RESOLUTION NO. 95- R:~q'rA,q;RY~V~qDOR.OD :2/21/~G k.lb 3 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 RESOLUTION NO. 95- A RESOL~ON OF THF~ C1TY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY OF TI~MECULA MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN CONNECTION WITH THF~ APPROVAL OF ~ CITY OF TEMECULA VENDOR'S ORDINANCE AND ADOFFING THY~ NEGATIVE DECLARATION. WheREaS, THF- CITY OF TI~IECULA prepared the Vendor's Ordinance in accordance with the City d Temecula General Plan and Rive~ide County Land Use and" Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference; W!~l~n~,S, The Vendor's Ordinance was processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local hw; ~ EA~, the planning Commission considered the Vendor' s Ordinance on November 7, 1994 and December 5, 1994, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or in opposition; WFt!~lr.~kS, at the conclusion of the December 5, 1994 Commission hearing, the Commission recommended approval of said Ordinance; WI~:REAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing pertaining to said Ordinance on February 28, 1995, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition to said Ordinance; WItERIr. AS, the City Council received a copy of the Cornminion proceedings and Staff Report regarding the Ordinance; NOW, TH]~~, THF~ CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY OF ~ DOES I~'-~OLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOx.lOWS: Section 1. Findi~. That the Temecuh City Council hereby makes the following findings: A. The City Council in approving the proposed Ordinance, makes the following findings, to wit: 1. Vendors offer the citizens of the community an alternative service. 2. Vendors will promote the public imerest by contributing to an active pedestrian environment. ~.:~'TAirFRN~VBNDOR.ORD 2/~!/95 Hb 4 3. The action proposed is consi._~'nt with the General plan Village Center policies which call for pedestrisn oriented uses. 4. The action proposed complies with all other applicable requirements of state law and local ordinances. Section 2. Environmental Compliance. The City Council in adopting the Negative Declaration of environmental impact under the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act, specifically fin& that the approval of the proposed Vendor Ordinance will have a di minimls impact on fish and wildllfe resources. The City Council specifically finds that in considering the record as a whole, the project involves no potet~tial adverse effect, either individually or cumulatively, on wildlife as the same is defined in Section 711.2 of the Fish and Game Code~ This is based on the fact that this all vendors will be located on improved commercial property. The City Council further finds that the City of Temecula is the project '- proponent and the site is located Citywide, Temecula, California. Furthermore, the City Council finds that an initial study has been prepared by the City Staff and considered by the City Council which has been the basis to evaluate the potential for adverse impact on the environment and forms the basis for the City Council' s determination, including the information contained in the public hearing records, on which a Negative Declaration of environmental impact was issued and this di minimi,~ finding is made. In addition, the City Council finds that there is no evidence before the City that the proposed project wffi have any potential for an adverse effect on wildlife resou~, or the habitat on which the wildlife depends. Finally, the City Council finds that the City has, on the basis of substantial evidence, xP. butted the presumption of adverse effect contained in 14 California Code of Regulations 753.5(d). The Negative Declaration is hereby approved. Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Rr, solution. R:~"TAPFRF~V!~/DOR.ORD 2t21/9~ Idb 5 Section 4. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTIn) this 28th day of February, 1995 . Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor ATTF. ST: June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF ~ULA) I ~lmV. ny (~!~crtFf that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 28th day of Febnutty, 1995 by the following vote of the Council: COUNCHIIEMBERS: NO~S: COUNTERS: COUN~EP, S: June S. Greek, City Clerk R:~TAFFRF~VENDOR.ORD 2/21/95 lab 6 ATTACHMENT NO. 2 ORDINANCE NO. 95- R:~S'TAFFRPI~VBNIX)R.ORD 2/'21/95 /LIb 7 ORDINANCE NO. 95- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMF_,CULA PERTAINING TO OUTDOOR VENDORS AND ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS FOR OUTDOOR VENDING. WHERF_AS, the City Council of the City of Temecula hereby finds that Outdoor Vending on private property promotes public interest by contributing to an active pedestrian environment, and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Temecula further finds that reasonable regulation of outdoor vending is necessary to protect the public health, safety, and welfare. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Finding. That the Temecula City Council hereby mak~ the following findings: A. The phnning agency and City' Council find, in appmving projects, adopting land use regulations, and taking other actions, each of the foBowing: 1. That the regulations of outdoor vending activities set forth herein axe consistent with the General Plan because the proposed action is consistent with the General Plan Village Center Policies which call for pedestrian oriented uses. 2. The proposed use or action complies with all other applicable requirements of state hw and local ordinances. Section 2. "Purpose. The purpose of this Chapter is to set forth the development standards for the siting of outdoor vendors within the City limits. The purpose of these standards is to ensure that the design and location of these vendors are consistent with the health, safety, and aesthetic objectives of the City. It is a desire of the City that the design of this community be of the highest quality, that new development be architecturally distinctive as well as homogeneous in design, and that accessory facih'ties be compatible with the overall theme of the community. Recognizing that outdoor vendors Offer the citizens of the community an alternative service, the regulations of this Chapter are enacted W: R:\STAFFRPT\VENDORS2.0RD 2/16/95 du A. Promote public inter~t by contributing to an active pedestrian environment; B. Set forth the conditions and requirements under which outdoor vendors may be permitted to operate on private property. Section 3. Definitions. For purposes of this Chapter, the following words, terms, phrases, and their derivations, shall have the meanings given herein. Then, consistent with the context, words used in the present tense singular include the plural. A. 'Applicant' means any person 'who seeks to obtain a vending license pursuant to the procedures and requirements of this Chapter. B. 'Developed' means property that is fully improved. C. 'Outdoor Vending License' means a license obtained pursuant to the procedures and requirements of this Chapter which permits a vendor to sell food or merchandise from a vending stand on private pwperty subject to the limitations of this Chapter and any other applicable hws. D. 'Outdoor Vendor' means any person who sells food or merchandise from a vending stand. E. 'Private Property' means privately owned, developed, commercial property within the City limits. F. 'Pushcart' means any device designed to be moved by human power, including, but not lirnit{~l to, wagons, or other wheeled containers or conveyances. G. 'Vending' means the sale of f~Dcl or merchandise from a vending stand operating on private property within the City limits. H. 'Vending Stand' means a pushcan, wagon, or any other wheeled vehicle or device which may be moved without the assistance of a motor or which may be towed by motor vehicle to the outdoor vending location and is used for the disphying, storing, or transporting of articles offered for sale by an outdoor vendor. Section 4. T,ieep~e and Application A. Yicen ling. It shall be unlawful to sell, or offer for sale, any food, beverage, or merchandise from a vending stand on any private property within the City limits without first obtaining an Outdoor Vending License. Existing businesses which legally operate outdoor disphys of merchandise prior to the adoption of this Chapter, are not required to obtain an Outdoor Vending License for a period of one year from adoption of the Ordinance. R:\STAFFRPT\VENDORS2.0RD 2116195 du -2- B. Application. The application for an Outdoor Vending License sb~ll be signed by the applicant and shall include the foliowing: 1. The name, home, and business address of the applicant, and the name and address of the owner (if other than the applicant) of the vending stand to be used in the operation of the rending business. 2. A description of the type of food, beverage, or merchandise to be sold. 3. A description and photograph (including signage and colon) of any vending stand to be used in the operation of the business. 4. A site plan delineating the location of the vending stand. 5. A photograph or dra. wipg of the rending stand to be used for review during the application approval process, showing materials, colon, and signage. 6. An application fee as eslablished by Resolution of the City Council. Section 5. Written consent of the property owner W make the application. l-~mance. A. Not hter than thirty (30) days after the filing of a completed application for an Outdoor Vending License, the Director of Planning shall appwve, deny, or conditionally appwve the application and notify the applicant of his or her decision. B. Licenses to vend outdoor within the City limits shall be reviewed and appwved by the Director of Planning in conjunction with the Business License Registration Program, Building and Safety, and Public Works Departments. C. There shall be at least two-hundred square feet (200 sq. ~.) of useable area for each allowed vending stand. The vending stand shall be free of all obstructions within a six foot (6') perimeter. D. Locations for vending in the City shall be approved by the Planning Director. Vending locations shall be designated based on the ability of the site to safely accommodate the use by not interfering with pedestrian circ~tion and access or vehicle circulation or parking. The Planning Director may require that the vending stand be removed from the location and stored out of public view when not in use. E. Vend_ing locations may change only upon written request by an applicant and/or Outdoor Vending Licensee and approval of the Director of Planning. R:\STAFFRPT\VEHDORS2.0P-D 2/16/95 du -3- Chapter. All vending locations shall be on private property as previously defined in this Section 6. Term and Renewal. A. All Outdoor Vending Licenses are valid for one year unless revoked or suspended prior to expiration. An application to renew an Outdoor Ventling License shall be made not later than sixty (60) days before the expiration of the current Outdoor Vending Business License Registration Program procedures outlined in this Code. Section 7. Prohibited Conduct and Hours of Operation. conditions: It shall be prohibited for any vendor to operate under any of the following 1. Operate between 10:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. of the following day unless in conjunction with a special event as set forth in Riverside County Ordinance No. 348, Section 19.51 as adopted by the City. 2. Leave any vending stand unattended. 3. Store, park, or leave any vending stand within any public right-of-way or on any undeveloped or otherwise vacant property. 4. Sell food or beverages without appropriate Health Department permits for immediate consumption or otherwise unless there is a litter receptacle available nearby for public use. Alcohol sales shall not be permitted unless in conjunction with a special event. 5. Leave any location without first picking up, removing, and disposing of all Wash or refuse remaining from sales made from the vending stand. 6. Allow any items rehting to the operation of the vending business to be phced anywhere other than in, or under the vending stand. 7. Set up, maintain, or permit the use of any additional table, crate, carton, rack, or other device to increase the selling or display capacity of the vending stand where such additional items have not been approved by the Director of Planning. 8. Solicit or conduct bUsihess with persons in motor vehicles. e Sell anything other than that which the Outdoor Vending License R:\STAFFRPT\VENDORS2.0RD 2/16/95 du .-4- 10. Sound or permit the sounding of any device which produces a loud and raucous noise, or use or operate any loud speaker, public address system, radio, sound amplifier, or similar device to attract the attention of the public. Have any flashing, rotating, or other similar lights or lighting to attract the attention of the public or in violation of the California Vehicle Code Section 21466.5. Section 8. Safety R~uirements. A. All rending stands in or frOm'which food is prepared or sold shall comply with the following requirements: 1. All equipment installed in any pan of the vending stand shall be secured in order to prevent movement during Wansit and to prevent detachment in the event of a collision or overturn. 2. All utensils shall be stored in order to prevent their being hurled about in the event of a sudden stop, collision, or overturn. A safety knife holder shall be provided to avoid loose storage of knives. 3. Compressors, auxiliary engines, generators, batteries, battery chargers, gas fueled water heaters, and similar equipment shall be installed so as to be hidden from . view to the extent possible and be easily accessible.. B. No vending stand shall exceed four feet (4') in width, six feet (6') in length, and eight feet (8') in height, inclusive of signage, umbrellas, etc. Section 9. Display of Outdoor Vend|no T~eense. A. All Outdoor Vending Licenses shall be displayed in a visible and conspicuous location at all times during the operation of the vending business. Section 10. Advertising. A. No advertising, except the posting of prices, shall be permitted on any vending stand, except to identify the name of the product or the name of the vendor. Section 11. Denial. Stmpenslon. and Revocation. A. Any Outdoor Vending License may be denied, suspended, or revoked in accordance with the procedures contained in this Code for any of the following causes: 1. Fraud or misrepresentation contained in the application for the Outdoor Vending License. R:\STAFFRPT\VEMDOeS2.ORD 2/16/95 clu - -5- 2. Conduct of the licensed business in such a manner as to create a public nuisance, or constitute a danger to the public health, safety, welfare, or mornl__s. 3. Conduct which is conWary to the provisions of this Chapter. B. Any person wishing to appeal any denial, suspension, or revocation of an Outdoor Vending License may do so, pursuant to the authority and procedures of Chapter 2.36 of this Code. Section 12. Penalty for Violation A. Any viohtion of any of the requirements of this Chapter shall be an infraction and any viohtor may be pUniS!g~d pursuant to Section 1.20 et l!~l- of this Code.' Section 13. If any section, subsectiOn, subdivision, sentence, chuse, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance, is for any reasons held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance, and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, chuse, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, chuses, phrases, or portions thereof be declared invalid or .. unconstitutional. Section 14. The City Clest shall cause this Ordinance to be appropriately codified in the Municipal Code. Section 1f. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. The City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Oniinance and a certified copy of the full text of this Ordinance shall be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five days prior to the adoption of this Ordinance. Within 15 days from adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Olxlinance, together with the names of the Councilmembers voting for and against the Ordinance, and .pq. st the same in the office of the City Clerk. R:\STAFFRPT\VEII)ORS2.OP, D 7../16/95 du Section 16. PASSED AND APPRO.VED this 28th day of February, 1995. ATTEST: MAYOR June S. Greek, City Cl~rk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Gregory G. Diaz Assistant City Attorney [SEAL] R:\STAFFRPT\VENDO!tS2.ORD 2/16/95 clu -'7- STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF TEMECULA x, , city 1~ m~ city of "~C:';: , do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 9~,!~was regularly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of thei.,Ci,'ty Council on the 28tli'day of February, 1995. That thereafter, said Ordinance was d~.y adopted and passed ai'~a regular meeting of the City Council on the 14th day of March,: by the following AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMI=-MBERS: R:\STAFFRPT\VENDORS2.(ID 2/16/~5 du -8- to wit: ATTACHMENT NO. 3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DATED DECEMBER 5, 1994 R:~ST.a. kFI~.R~VINDOR.ORD :2/21/95 lr, lb 8 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBFr, Cr: Planning Commissionea~ Gary Thornhill, Director of planning December 5, 1994 Vendor' s Ordinance Prepared By: Debbie Ubnosim, Senior Planner BACKGROUND The Vendor's Ordinance was on the Planning Commission's November 7, 1994 agenda. However, due to the lateness of the hour, the Planning Commission did not hear this item, but rather, continued it to the meeting of December 5, 1994. Subsequent to the November 7, 1994 pknning Commission meeting, the Assistant City Attorney made some minor changes to the Vendor's Ordinance. No substantive changes were made. AT!'ACHMENT NO. 4 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DATED NOVEMBER 7, 1994 R:~STAYPRPI~VENDOR.ORD 2/21/95 Idb 9 STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION November 7, 1994 City of Temecula Vendor's Ordinance Prepared By: Debbie Ubnoske, Senior Planner RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Department Staff recommends the Planning Commission: ADOPT the Negative Declaration for City of Temecula Vendor's Ordinance; and APPLICATION INFORMATION APPLICANT: REPRESENTATIVE: PROPOSAL: LOCATION: APPROVE the City of Temecula's Vendor's Ordinance. City of Temecula City of Temecula An Ordinance pertaining to street vendors establishing regulations for outdoor vending. and City Wide EXISTING ZONING: SURROUNDING ZONING: N~A North: N~A South: N~A East: N~A West: N~A PROPOSED ZONING: N~A GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: N~, EXISTING LAND USE: N~A SURROUNDING LAND USES: North: N~A South: N~A East: N~A West: N~A R:~,STAFFRpT~VENDOR.PC 2116/95 klb 1 PROJECT STATISTICS Total Area 26 square miles BACKGROUND At the July 12, 1994 City Council Meeting, during City Council reports, Mayor Pro Tam Jeff Stone requested staff prepare an Ordinance to address transient and road side vending within City limits for the purpose of assisting in enforcement. This matter was placed on the September 13, 1994 City Council agenda to allow the City Council the opportunity to provide direction to staff on the preparation of a vending ordinance. PROJECT DESCRIPTION At the present time, the City of Temecula has no vending ordinance which would permit. vendors to sell wares within the City limits. The Old Town Specific Plan does contain language which allows vendors. This Ordinance has been modeled after the language contained in the Old Town Specific Plan.. The purpose of this Ordinance is to set forth development standards for the siting of vendors within the City limits. These standards will ensure that the design and location of these vendors are consistent with the health, safety, and aesthetic objectives of the City. ANALYSIS Intent of the Ordinance It is the City's belief that vendors offer the citizens of the community an alternative service. Further, it is the intent of this Ordinance to promote public interest by contributing to an active pedestrian environment. The Vendor's Ordinance will allow for stands (i.e. pushcarts, wagons, etc.) to be located in areas that will safely accommodate the use by not interfering with pedestrian circulation and access or vehicle circulation or parking. Locational Characteristics Locations for vending in the City shall be approved by the Director of Planning. There should be at least 200 square feet of useable or recognizable plaza or courtyard area for each permitted outdoor vending cart. The area should be free of all obstructions within a six foot perimeter of the stand. All vending locations shall be on privately owned, developed, commercial property within City limits. Vending locations may change only upon written request by an applicant and approval of the Director of Planning. Aoolication Issuance and Fees Within, but no later than 30 days after filing of a completed application for a vendor's license, the applicant shall be notified of the decision on the issuance or denial of the license. Fees shall be determined by Resolution of the City Council and shall be paid with the submission of an application. R:~STAFFRFT~VENDOR.PC 2116/95 Idb 2 Term and Renewal All vendor's licenses shell be valid for one year unless revoked or suspended prior to expiration. An application to renew a license shall be made not later than 60 days before the expiration of the current license. License fees and renewal procedures shall be established in accordance with the Business License Registration Program procedures outlined in the Municipal Code. Prohibited Conduct end Hours of Ooeretion The Ordinance regulating vendors has specific restrictions (reference Section 7 of the Ordinance). These restrictions relate to the following: hours of operation; storage of the vending cart; trash control; sale of items; solicitation with persons in motor vehicles; and noise. Enforcement The Ordinance allows for the denial, suspension or revocation of a vendor's license in cases of fraud or misrepresentation; public health, safety and welfare; and conduct which is contrary to the Ordinance. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION A Negative Declaration was prepared for this Ordinance which found no significant impacts as · result of the adoption of this Ordinance. SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS It is the intent of the City of Temecule to establish an Outdoor Vending Ordinance to promote the public interest by contributing to an active pedestrian environment. It is further the intent of the Ordinance to regulate outdoor vending in order to protect the public health, safety and welfare. This Ordinance provides a mechanism whereby vendors may legally operate within the City limits on privately owned, developed, commercial property. FINDINGS 1. Vendors offer the citizens of the community an alternative service. Vendors will promote the public interest by contributing to an active pedestrian environment. The action proposed is consistent with the General Plan Village Center policies which call for pedestrian oriented uses. The action proposed complies with all other applicable requirements of state law and local ordinances. R:'~STAFF!qPI'~VENDOFLPC 2116/96 klb 3 Attachments: Ordinance No. 94- - Blue Page 5 Resolution No. 94- - Blue Page 13 Initial Study- Blue Page 17 I~STAFFRPT~VENDOR. PC 2116/96 Idb 4 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 ORDINANCE NO. 94- R:%STAFFRPI~VENDOR.PC 2/16/96 Idb 5 ORDINANCE NO. 94- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA PERTAINING TO OI.rIIN3OR VENIX)RS AND ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS FOR OUTDOOR VENDING WItERE~,S, the City Council of the City of Temecula hereby finds that Outdoor Vending on private property promotes public interest by contributing to an active pedestrian environment, and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Temecula further finds that reasonable.. regulation of outdoor vending is necessary to protect the public health, safety, and welfare. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Fintllngs. That the Temecula City Council hereby makes the following findings: A. The planning agency and City Council find, in approving projects, adopting land use reguhtions, and taking other actions, each of the following: 1. That the regulations of outdoor vending activities set forth herein are consistent with the General Plan foecause the action proposed is consistent with the General Plan Village Center policies which call for pedestrian oriented uses). 2. The proposed use or action complies with all other applicable requirements of state hw and local ordinances. Section 2. "Purpose. The purpose of this Chapter is to set forth the development standards for the siting of outdoor vendors within the City limits. The purpose of these standards is to ensure that the design and location of these vendors are consistent with the health, safety, and aesthetic objectives of the City. It is a desire of the City that the design of this community be of the highest quality, that new development be architecturally distinctive as well as homogeneous in design, and that accessory facilities be compatible with the overall theme of the community. Recognizing that outdoor vendors offer the citizens of the community an alternative service, the regulations of this Chapter are enacted to: A. Promote public interest by contributing to an active pedestrian environment; R:%STAFFRI:rI~VENDOR.PC 2116/95 Idb 6 B. Set forth the conditions and requirements under which outdoor vendors may be permitted to operate on private property. Section 3. Def'mition.. For purposes of this Chapter, the following words, terms, phrases, and their derivations, 'shall have the meanings given herein. Then, consistent with the context, words used in the present tense singular include the plural. A. 'Applicant' means any person who seeks to obtain a vending license pmuant to the procedures and requirements of this Chapter. B. 'Outdoor Vending License' means a license obtained pursuant to the procedures and requirements of this Chapter which permits a vendor to sell food or merchandise from a vending stand on private property subject to the limitations of this Chapter and any other applicable laws. C. 'Outdoor Vendor' means any person who sells food or merchandise from a rending stand. D. 'Private Property' means privately owned, developed, commercial property within the City limits. E. 'Pushcart' means any device designed to be moved by human power, including, but not limited to, wagons, or other wheeled containers or conveyances. F. 'Vending' means the sale of food or merchandise from a vending stand operating on private p~ within the City limits. G. 'Vending Stand' means a pusheart, wagon, or any other wheeled vehicle or device which may be moved without the assistance of a motor or which may be towed by motor vehicle to the outdoor vending location and is used for the disphying, storing, or wansporting of articles offered for sale by an outdoor vendor. Section 4. License and AllVlication A. Licensing. It shall be unlawful to sell, or offer for sale, any food, beverage, or merchandise from a vending stand on any private property within the City limits without first obtaining an Outdoor Vending License. Existing businesses which legally operate outdoor disphys of merchandise prior to the adoption of this Chapter, are not required to obtain an Outdoor Vending License for a period of one year from adoption of the Ordinance. B. Apl)lication. The application for an Outdoor Vending License shall be signed by the applicant and shall include the following: 1. The name, home, and business address of the applicant, and the name and address of the owner (if other than the applicant) of the vending stand to be used in the operation of the vending business. R:~STAFFRPT~VENDOR.PC 2/16]95 Mb 7 2. A description of the type of food, beverage, or merchandise to be sold. 3. A description and photograph (including signage and colors) of any vending stand to be used in the operation of the business. 4. A site plan delineating the location of the vending stand. Section ~. Imanee and Fees. A. Not hter than thirty (30) days after the filing of a completed application for an Outdoor Vendlag License, the applicant shall be notified of the decision on the issuance or denial of the Outdoor Vending License. 1. Fees shall be established by Resolution'of the City Council and shall be. paid prior to issuance of an Outdoor Vendlag License. 2. Licenses to vend outdoor within the City limits shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Planning in conjunction with the Business License Registration Program, Building and Safety, and Public Works Departments. 3. There should be at least two-hundred square feet (200 sq. ft.) of useable or recognizable plaza or courtyard area for each allowed rending stand. The rending stand should be free of all obstructions within a six foot (6') perimeter. 4. Locations for vending in the City shall be approved by the Planning Director. Vending locations shall be designated based on the ability of the site to safely accommodate the use by not interfering with pedestrian circ~tion and access or vehicle circulation or parking. The Planning Director may require that the vending stand be removed from the location and stored out of public view when not in use. 5. Vendlag locations may change only upon written request by an applicant and/or Outdoor Vending Licensee and approval of the Director of Planning. in this Chapter. All vendlag locations shall be on private property as previously defined Section 6. Term and Renewal. A. All Outdoor Vending Licenses are valid for one year unless revok~ or suspended prior to expiration. An application to mew an Outdoor Vending License shall be made not later than sixty (60) days before the expiration of the current Outdoor Vending License. License fees and renewal procedures shall be established in accordance with the Business License Registration Program procedures outlined in this Cede. R:~,STAFFIqPT%VENDOR.PC 2116/95 Idb 8 Section 7. A. It conditions: Prohibited Conduct and Hours of O!~erntion. shall be prohibited for any vendor to operate under any of the foBowing 1. Operate between 10:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. of the following day unless in conjunction with a special event as set forth in Ordinance No. 348, Section 19.51. 2. Leave any vending stand unattended. 3. Store, park, or leave any vending stand within any public right-of-way or on any undeveloped or otherwise vacant property. 4. Sell food or beverages for immediate consumption unless there is a litter receptacle available nearby for public use. 5. Leave any location without first picking up, removing, and disposing of all trash or refuse remaining from sales made from the vending stand. 6. Allow any items relating to the operation of the vending business to be placed anywhere other than in, or under the-vending stand. 7. Set up, maintain, or permit the use of any additional table, crate, carton, rack, or other device to increase the selling or display capacity of the vending stand where such additional items have not been approved by the Director of Planning. 8. Solicit or conduct business with persons in motor vehicles. 9. Sell anything other than that which the Outdoor Vending License permits. 10. Sound or permit the sounding of any device which produces a loud and mucous noise, or use or operate any loud speaker, public address system, radio, sound amplifier, or similar device to attract the attention of the public. Section 8. Vendinl, Stand Requirements. A. Every applicant shall submit a photograph or drawing of the vending stand to be used for review during the application approval process, showing materials, colon, and signage. B. No vending stand shall exc~d- four feet (4') in width, six fe~t (6') in length, and eight feet (8') in height. Section 9. Safety Requirements. A. All vending stands in or from which food is prepared or sold shah comply with the following requirements: R:~STAFFRPT~VENDOR. PC 2116/95 kib 9 1. All equipment installed in any pan of the vendinn stand shall be secured in order to prevent movement during transit and to prevent detachment in the event of a collision or overttim. 2. All utensils shall be stored in order to prevent their being hurled about in the event of a sudden stop, collision, or overturn. A safety knife holder shall be provided to avoid loose storage of knives. 3. Compressors, auxiliary engines, generators, batteries, battery chargers, gas fueled water heaters, and similar equipment shall be installed so as to be hidden from view to the extent possible and be easily accessible. SeCtion 10. D_hl~v of Outdoor Vendinl l ,ieense. A. All Outdoor Vendinn Licenses shall be displayed in a visible and conspicuous location at all times during the operation of the vendinn business. Seelion 11. Advert|.~in~. A. No advertising, except the posting of prices, shall be permiRed on any vendinn stand, except to identify the name of the product or the name of the vendor. Seelion 12. Denial. Sn~pen,~ion. and Revocation. A. Any Outdoor Vendinn License my be denied, suspended, or revoked in accordance with the procedures contained in this Cede for any of the following causes: 1. Fraud or misrepresentation contained in the application for the Outdoor Vendinn License. 2. Fraud or misrepresentation made in the course of carrying on the business of vendinn. 3. Conduct of the licensed business in such a manner as to create a public nuisance, or constitute a danger to the public health, safety, welfare, or morals. 4. Conduct which is contrary to the provisions of this Chapter. B. Any person wishing to appeal any denial, suspension, 'or revocation of an Outdoor Vendinn License my do so, pursuant to the authority and procedures of Chapter 2.36 of this Code. Seelion 13. Penalty for Violation A. Any w'olafion of any of the requirements of this Chaptex shall be an infraction and any violator may be punished pursuant to Section 1.20 et seo_. of this Code.* R:t, STAF~VENDOR, PC 2118/95 klb 10 Section 14. If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance, is for any reasons held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance, and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions thereof be decbred invalid or unconstitutional. Section 15. The City Clerk shall cause this Ordinance to be appropriately codi~ed in the Municipal Code. Section 16. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. The City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance and a certified copy of the full text of this Ordinance shall. be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five days prior to the adoption of this Ordinance. Within 15 days from adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance, together with the names of the Councilmembers voting for and against the Ordinance, and post the same in the office of the City Clerk. R:~STAFFRPT'%VENDOR.PC 211e/95 Idb 11 day of ,19 Section 17. PASSED AND APPROVED this RON ROBERTS MAYOR A'ITEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Gregory G. Diaz, Assistant City Attorney [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF TEMEC~ I, , City Clerk of the City of , do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. was regularly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the day of ,19 . That thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the day of , 19 ., by the following vote, to wit: AYES: COUNC~ERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: R:~STAFFRPT~VENDOR.PC 211e/gS Idb ATTACHMENT NO. 2 RESOLUTION NO. 94.- R:%STAFFRPT'~,VENDOR.PC 2/16/95 klb 13 ATTACHMENT NO. 2 RESOLUTION NO. 94-36 A RESOLIH'ION OF THE PLANNING COMRgtgSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF CITY OF TEMECULA VENDOR'S ORDINANCE. WHERIP-&S, THE CITY OF TEIVIECULA prepared the Vendor's Ordinance in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Riverside County Land Use and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference; WHEREAS, The Vendor's Ordinance was processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local hw; VV!~ER~, the Phnning Commission considered the Vendor' s Ordinance on November 7, 1994, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or in opposition; WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all penons deserving to be heard, the Commission considered sll facts relating to the Vendor's Ordinance; NOW, THEREI~RE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct. Section 2. Findinffs. A. The Planning Commission in recommending approval of the City of Temecula's Vendor's Ordinance, makes the following findings, to wit: 1. Vendors offer the citizens of the community an alternative service. 2. Vendors will promote the public interest by contributing to an active pedegai~ environment. 3. The action proposed is consistent with the General Plan Village Center policies which call for pedestrian oriented uses. 4. The action proposed complies with all other applicable requirements of state hw and local ordinances. R:~,STAFFRFT'~VENDOR.PC 211e/95 Idb 14 B. The Planning Commission in appmving the certification of the Negative Declaration of environmental impact under the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act, specifically finds that the approval of this Conditional Use Permit will have a di minirnis impact on fish and wildlife resources. The Planning Commission specifically finds that in considering the record as a whole, the project involves no potential adverse effect, either individually or cumulatively, on wildlife as the same is defined in Section 711.2 of the Fish and Game Code. This is based on the fact that this all vendors will be located on improved commercial property. The Planning Commission further finds that the City of Temecula is the project proponent and the site is located Citywide, Temecula, California. Furthermore, the Planr~ng Commission finds that an initial study has been prepared by the City Staff and considered by the Planning Commigsion which has been the basis to evaluate the potential for adverse impact on the environment and forms the basis for the Planning Commission's determma'tion, including the information contained in the public hearing records, on which a Negative Declaration of environmental impact was issued and this di minimis finding is made. In addition, the Planning Commission finds that there is no evidence before the City that the proposed project will havc any potential for an adverse effect on wildlife resources, or thc habitat on which the wildlifc depends. Finally, the Planning Commission finds that the City has, on the basis of substantial evidence, rebutted the presumption of adverse effect contained in 14 California Code of Regulations 753.5(d). - Section 3. Environmental Compliance. An Initial Study prepared for this project indicates that the proposed project will not have a significant impact on the environment and a Negative Declaration, therefore, is hereby granted. Section 4. Not Applicable,. R:~STAFFRPT~VENDOR.PC 2/16/95 klb '~ S Section $. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 5th day of December, 1994. STEVEN I. FORD I tlERERY CERTIFY that the foregoing Re.~lution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 5th day of December, 1994 by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: 4 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: FORD, FAHEY, SLAVEN AND WEBSTER NOES: 0 ABSENT: 1 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: BLAIR GARY THORNHILL SECRETARY R:~STAFFIqP'RVENDOI=LPC 2/16/116 k. ib 16 ATTACHMENT NO. 3 INITIAL STUDY R:~.STAFFRFI'%VENDOFLPC 211e/95 klb 17 City of Temecula Planning Department Initial Environmental Study I. BACKGROUND INFORMATION 2. 3. 4. Name of Project: Case Numbers: Location of Project: Description of Project: 5. Date of Environmental Assessment: Name of Proponent: Address and Phone Number of Proponent: Vendor's Ordinance N~A City Wide An Ordinance to address transient and road side vending within City limits. October 19, 1994 City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California 92590 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations to all the answers are pwvided in Section Yes No 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes geologic substructures? _ _ X b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction, or over covering of the soil? __ __ X c. Change in topography or ground surface relief futures? __ __ d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? -- -- e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? -- -- f. Changes in siltation, deposition or erosion? __ __ g. The modification of any wash, channel, creek, river or lake? _ _ Maybe R:~STAFFRI~VENDOR.PC 2116/95 k. lb 18 Yes Maybe 2. Air. a. b. C. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mudslides, liquefaction, ground fa~ure, or similar hazards? Any development within an Al~qujst-Priolo Special Studies Zone? Will the proposal result in: Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality?. The creation of objectionable odors? Alteration of air movement, temperature, or moisture or any change in climate, whether locally or regionally? Water. Will the proposal result in: Changes in currents, or the come or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff?. c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waten? Change in the amount of surface Water in any water body?. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited w, temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions, withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding? 4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: Change in the diversity of species, or number of any native species of plants (including trees,- shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)? X X X X X X R:XSTAFFRPT~VENOOR.laC 2/16/95 Idb 19 Yes Mayb~ No Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, threatened, or endangered species of plants? -- c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area of native vegetation, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? -- d. Reduction in the acreage of any agricultural crop? -- Animal Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (animals includes all land animals, birds, reptiles, fish, amphibians, shellfish, benthic organisms, and/or insects)? _ b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, threatened, or endangered species of animals? c. The introduction of new wildlife species into an area? __ d. A barrier to the migration or movement of animals? __ e. Deterioration to existing fk~h or wildlife habitat?. -- Noise. Will the proposal result in: a. Increases in existing noise levels7 -- b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? c. Exposure of people to severe vibrations? -- Light and Glare. Will the pwposal produce or result in light or glare? Land Use. Will the proposal result in: a. Alteration of the present land use of an area? X b. Alteration to the future p|,nned land use of an area as described in a community or general plan? -- Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a. An increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? b. The depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? X X X X X X X X X X R:~STAFFRF'I'~VmDOR.PC 2/le/ss klb 20 Yes Maybe No Risk a. 10. of Upset. Will the proposal result in: A risk of an explosion or the release of any hazardous substances in the event of an accident or upset conditions (hazardous substances includes, but is not limits! to, pesticides, chemicals, oil or radiation)? b. The use, storage, tran~pon or disposal of any hazardous or toxic materials (including, but not limited to oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation)? c. Possible interference with an emergency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan? 11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing or create a demand for additional housing? 13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking7 c. Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems, including public transportation? d. Alterations to present panems of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? 14. Public Serviees. Will the proposal have .substantial affect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governxnental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? b. Police protection? c. Schools? d. Parks or other recreational facilities? X X X_ X X X X_ R:%STAFFRP'T%VENDOR.PC 2116/95 Idb 2 1 -. Yes e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? _ L Other governmental services: -- 15. Ene*gy. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? __ b. Substantial increase in demand upon existinf sources or energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? __ 16. Utilities. Will the proposal restfit in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to any of the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? -- b. CommvJnications systems? -- c. Water systems? -- d. Sanitary sewer systems or septic tanks? __ e. SWim water drainage systems? -- f. Solid waste disposal systems? -- g. Will the proposal result in a disjointed or inefficient pattern of utility delivery system improvements for any of the above? _ 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in: a. The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? _ b. The exposure of people to potential health hazards, including the exposure of sensitive receptors (such as hospitals and schools) to toxic pollutant emissions? __ 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in: M ybe X X X_ X X X 19. a. The obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public? _ b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view?. _ c. Detrimental visual impacts on the surrounding area? __ Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational resources or opportunities? __ X R:~STAFFRPT~VENDOP~PC 2116/95 Idb 22 Yes Maybe No 20. Cultural Resources. Will the proposal result in: The alteration or destruction of any paleontologic, prehistoric, archaeological or historic site? Adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure, or object? Any potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? Restrictions to existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? X X X R:~STAFFRPT~VENDOR.PC 2116/96 klb 23 HI. DISCUSSION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMAC'I~ ~ Earth The proposal will not result in unstable earth conditions, changes in geologic substructures; disruptions, displacement, compaction or ov~rcovexing of the soil; changes in topography; destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features; any increase in wind or water erosion of soils; changes in silta~on, deposition or erosion; modification of any wash, channel, creek, river or lake. The project(s) may result in the exposure of people to geologic hazards such as earthquakes since all of Southern California subject to earthquake activity. No Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zones exist in the City. All vendors will be located on commercial property that is fully improved. No sigm'~cant impacts are anticipated. No mitigation is required. Air The proposal will not result in air emi~ions or .deterioration of ambient air quality; the creation of objectionable odors, or any alteration of air movement, temperature or moisture, or any change in climate. All vendors will be located on commercial property that is fully improved. No significant impacts will occur. No mitigation is required. Water The proposal will not result in changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements; changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff; alterations to the .course or flow of flood waters; a change in the amount of surface water in any water body; discharge into surface waters, or alteration of surface water quality; alteration of the direction or rate of flow of Found waters; changes in the quantity of ground waters; reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies; or exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding. All vendors will be located on commercial property that is fully improved. No significant impacts will occur. No mitigation is required. Plant Life The proposal will not result in a change in the diversity of species, or number of any native species of plants; reduction in the numbers of any unique, rare, threatened, or endangered species of plants; introduction of new species of plants into an area of native vegetation, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species; or a reduction in the acreage of any agricultural crop. All vendors will be located on commercial property that is fully improved. No significant impacts will occur. No mitigation is required. Animal Life The proposal will not result in a change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals; reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, threatened, or endangered species of animals; introduction of new wildlife species into an area; a barrier to the migration or movement of animals; or deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat. All vendors will be located in commercial areas that are fully improved. No significant impacts will occur. No mitigation is required R:%,STAFFRPT~VENDOR. PC 2n6/95 Idb 24 Noise The proposal will not expose people to severe noise levels or vibrations. The proposal may result in increases in existing noise levels. All vendors will be located on commercial property that is fully improved. Increases in noise levels will be minimal due to the small size of the vending cart. Commercial areas are generally not noise sensitive areas. All vendors will be located in commercial areas that are fully improved. No significant impacts will occur. No mitigation is required. Light and Glare The project site is located within the Mount Palomar Observatory Special Lighting District. The lighting standards within this district require that only low pressure sodium street and security lights be installed and all other lighting must be oriented or shielded to reduce the glare in the night sky near the observatory. Additional light and glare may result from the development of the site for a vendor. The impact of the additional light and glare will be mitigated by following the standards of the Mount Palomar Observatory,. Special Lighting District (Ordinance No. 6~5') and through the appropriate design of the lighting system. No significant impacts will occur. No mitigation is required. Land Use The proposal will result in a minor alteration to the present land use of an area in that a vendor may be introduced into a commercial shopping area. No alteration to the future planned land use of an area will occur. All vendors will be located in commercial areas that are fully improved~ No significant impacts will occur. No mitigation is required. Natural Resources The proposal will not result in the rate of use of any natural resources or the depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource. All vendors will be located in commercial areas that are fully improved. No significant impacts will occur. No mitigation is required. Risk of Upset The proposal will not result in a risk of an explosion or the release of any hazardous substances in the event of an accident; the use, storage, transport or disposal of any hazardous or toxic materials; or possible interference with an emergency response or evacuation plan. The vendors will not be dealing with hazardous materials. All vendors will be located in commercial areas that are fully improved. No significant impacts will occur. No mitigation is required. Population The proposal will not alter the location, distribution, density or growth rate of the human population of an area. The size of the vending carts is of such a minor nature that it will not create impacts. No significant impacts will occur. No mitigation is required. R:~STAFFRPT~VENDOR.PC 2116/96 Idb 25 Housing The proposal, due W its nature, will not affect existing housing or create a demand for additional housing. All vendors will be located in commercial areas that are fully improved. No significant impacts will occur. No mitigation is required. Transi~ortation/Circulation The proposal will not generate substantial additional vehicular movement; effect .existing parking facilities; create a demand for new paricing; impact existing tt~an~portation systems, including public trn_~sportation; alter present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods; alter waterborne, rail, or air traffic; or increase traffic hazards. All vendors will be located in commercial areas that are fully improved. No significant impacts will occur. No mitigation is required. Public Services The proposal will not have an effect on public services including fire, police, schools, parks or the maintenance of any public facfiities. All vendors w~l be located in commercial areas that are fully improved. No significant impacts wfil occur. No mitigation is required. The proposal will not result in the use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy, 'substantially increase demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy. All vendors will be located in commercial areas that are fully improved. No significant impacts wfil occur. No mitigation is required. Utilities The proposal will not result in the need for new systems or substantial alterations to power, communications systems, water systems, sanitary systems, storm water drainage systems, or solid waste disposal systems. All vendors will be located in commercial areas that are fully improved. No significant impacts will occur. No mitigation is required. Human Health The proposal will not result in the creation of any health hazard or the exposure of people to potential health hazards. All vendors will be located in commercial areas that are fully improved. No significant impacts will occur. No mitigation is required. Aesthetics The proposal will not result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public or create an aesthetically offensive site open to public view. Whfie the vending cans could possibly have detrimental visual impacts on the surrounding area, the carts will be conditioned to be architecturally compatible with their surroundings. All vendors will be located in commercial areas that are fully improved. No significant impacts will occur. No mitigation is required. R:%S'f'AFFilq~VENDOR.PC 21'~ems Mb 26 Recreation The proposal will not result in an impact upon the' q~ality or quantity of existing recreational resources. vendors will be located in commercial areas that are fully improved. No significant impacts will occur. mitigation is required. All No Cultural Resources The proposal will not result in the alteration or destruction of any paleontologic, prehistoric, archaeological or historic sites; adverse physical or aesthetic effects to prehistoric or historic buildings, structures or objects; any potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values; or restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area. All vendors will be located in commercial areas that are fully improved. No significant imp, acts will occur. No mitigation is required. R:XSTAFFRPT~.VENDOR.PC 2116/95 Idb 27 IV. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE Does the project have the potential to either: degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish, wildlife or bird species, cause a fish, wildlife or bird population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to e,]iminnte a plant, bird or animal species, or eliminate important examples 'of the major periods of California history or prehistory? Yes Maltbe X Does the project have the potential to achieve short term, w the disadvantage of long term, environmental goals? (A abort term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long term impacts will endure well into the future.) X Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project's impact on two or more separate resources may be relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human. beings, either directly or indirectly? X V. DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME *DE MINIMUS" IMPACT FINDINGS Does the project have the potential to cause any adverse effect, either individually or cumulatively, on fish and wildlife resources? Wildlife is defined as 'all wild animals, birds, plants, fish, amphibians, and related ecological communities, including the habitat upon which the wildlife depends on for it's continued viability* (Section 711.2, Fish and Game Code). Yes No X R:~rAFFRPT~VENDOR.PC 211e/95 Idb 28 ENVIRONMENTAL DEfERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: I fred that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. X I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because the Mitigation Measures described on the attached sheets and in the Conditions of Approval that have been added to the project will mitigate any potentially significant impam to a leyel. of insignificance, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find .the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. Prepared by: Signature Name and Ti~e Date R:~STAFRtq~VENDOR,PC 2116/96 Id~ 29 ITEM 15 TO.' FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROV CITY ATTORNIR~ FINANCE OFFIC CITY MANAGE CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning February 28, 1995 School Mitigation Program Resolution Prepared David W. Hogan, Associate Planner RECOMMENDATION: It is requested that the City Council ADOPT the attached resolution entitled: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE SCHOOL FACILITY IMPACT MITIGATION PROGRAM" BACKGROUND During development of the City General Plan, the"Temecula Valley Unified School District requested that the City of Temecula require residential developers to fully mitigate the impact of new development on school facilities. In response to their request, the City Council included language in the Growth Management and Public Facilities Element stating that if Proposition 170 failed to win voter approval in the November 1993 Election, the City would establish a school mitigation resolution. A copy of the school facility related General Plan Implementation Measures are included in Attachment No. 3. The Resolution attached to this Agenda Report is the enabling legislation that authorizes the School District to submit a mitigation plan to the City. A copy of the proposed School Mitigation Resolution is included in Attachment No. 1. This item was continued from the February 14, 1995 meeting to allow the School District and area residential development companies an opportunity to discuss this issue and arrive at some form of consensus or compromise. DISCUSSION Representatives of the City and the Temecula Valley Unified School District have been working together since December 1993 to develop the attached resolution. The attached school mitigation program will do the following: Authorize the School District to prepare and submit a Mitigation Plan that addresses the impacts on school facilities; R:~"TA~HOLMIT.CC2 2/21/96 dwh 1 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 RESOLUTION NO. 95- R:'tSTAF~Ot. MIT.CC2 2/21/95 dwh 3 WItERE/SiS, the City, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), has the authority to review development proposals for impacts on School Facilities; and WFrEREA,q, pursuant to decisions reached in Mitt Devehlpment Corporation v. City of San Diego, 205 Cal. App. 3d 1201 (1988), William S.. l~art I-Iigh School District v. Regional Planning Co_mntissiotl, 226 Cal. App. 3d 1612 (1991), and Murrieta V~lley Unified School Digrict v. County of Riverside, 228 Cal. App. 3d 1212 (1991) interpreting the School Facilities Law of 1986, the City has the authority to condition legislative acts including general plan amendments, specific plans and amendments thereto, and changes of zone, if it finds that the impacts on school facilities have not been mitigated to a level of insignificance; and WI~rEREAS, the provision of a quality school system to educate the residents of the City of Tcmecula is important to the City's future; and WInmE~S, the Temecula Valley Unified School District requested that the City of Temecuh adopt a resolution providing creating a program to provide full funding for school facilities from some types of development; and WHEREAS, the City Council included language in the Growth Management and Public Facility Element of General Plan concerning the mitigation of school facility impacts; and Wt~a~AS, this Resolution is being adopted at the request of the District which has agreed to indemnify and hold harmless the City from claims resulting from the adoption, enforcement, or implementation of the Resolution; and WItEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered the Program and recommends that the Council approve this ~Eimion at its November 7, 1994 meeting; and WIr~EA~, notice of the proposed resolution was posted at City Hall, County Library, Rancho California Branch, the U.5. Pust Office, and Temecuh Valley Chamber of Commerce. NOW, THEI~EFORE, ~ CITY COUNCIL FOR ~ CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOt.IK)WS: Section 1. Mitigation of School Facility Impacts A. Except as pwvided below, all development projects and applications that are submitted to the City of Temecula and that require a General Plan amendment, zone change, development agreement, pre-annemtion agreement or Specific Plan appwval or amendment shall be reviewed for their potential school facility impacts and mifEatlon of such impacts. B. No conditions of appwval on General Plan amendment, zone change, development agreement, pre-annexation agreeram or Specific Plan approval or amendment shall require any applicant or developer to provide mitigation in excess of the mounts authorized by Government Code Section 65995 unless a School District Mitigati.'on Plan ("Mitigation Plan") has been prepared by or on behalf of the District and approved by the City Council. R:\$TAFFRFI'~SCHOLMIT.CC2 2/21/96 dwh 5 8. Any amendments to an approved specific plan or tract map that changes only the layout of the project, make minor changes to design and development standards, or make other administrative changes and does not increase the total number of residential housing units in the project. Section 3. Preparation of School Facility Impact lV~tigation Plans A. The Mitigation Plan sbnll conthin documentation of the need for any level of mitigation that exceeds the total of revenue anticipated to be received by the school from Statutory School Fees and any other sources of funding available to or anticipated by the District. The Mitigation Plan shall be adopted by the District Board of Trustees. At a minimum, all Mitigation Plans shall contain the following information: 1. Student Generation Factors. a household survey. high school grades. a. The District Student Generation Factor (SGF) shall be based upon The SGF shall include peak student loading for all elementary, middle and following: The SGF Household Survey shall be based upon and consist of the (1) A minimum random sample of 250 dwelling units that were constructed in the preceding three years. (2) characteristics of the community, characteristics of the community. A representative sample of the current or anticipated future including consideration for any resort or second home (3) The survey slmll exclude senior citizen housing. (4) A representative sample of the homing product types within the district (i.e. single family detached, single family attached, or multi-family. rental properties and mobile homes). (5) The SGF shall-be based on an assessment of student "pass through" from new homes over at least a five-year period. c. The District may propose additional survey factors and conditions to be included in the survey. The use of any additional survey factors and condition (that could affect the SGF) must be approved by the City' s Director of Planning prior to doing the survey. 2. Typical School Land Cost Factors a. The Typical School Land Costs Factor CFSF) shall be based on the Statc's standard cost and shall be based upon a finished and improved, construction ready school site, including the extension of necessary infrastructure. R:~,ST~HOLMIT.CC2 2/21/95 dwh 7 '~" 6. Level of Sul~port From New Development The Mitigation Plan may pwvide for total mitigation school facilities impacts that arc shown to result from new residential developments from all potenti:d funding sources. The Mitigation Plan shall not be used to provide for mitigation of impacts attributable to existing development. 7. Coordination of Plsnninl, Review for School Site DevelOpment. The Mitigation Plan shah include provisions for consultations between the Distria and the City on school facility location and site development plans, in order to promote compatibility with City land use, circulation, and other plans, and coordination on public improvements, including streets, sidewalks, and traffic control mech~nigm~. B. The District shah submit its adopted Mitigation Plan to the City for its review and approval as to whether it conforms to these requirements and could reasonably mitigate the additional impacts on the District sdmol facilities. Upon submittal of the Mitigation Plan to the City the following procedures shall be followed: 1. The District shall submit the adopted Mitigation Plan to the Director of Planning. The submittal shah be accompanied by fee to cover the City's cost of reviewing the District's plan. 2. Within 30 days foBowing receipt of the District' s Mitigation Plan, the Director of Planning shall review the plan to determine whether it conforms to the requirements of this Section. After reviewing the Mitigation Plan, the Director shall take one of the following actions: a. Notify, by written notice to the superintendent of the District, that the Mitigation Plan conforms to ~e requirements of this Resolution. The notice shall also contain the anticipated meeting date for the plnnning Commission's consideration of the Mitigation Plan. b. Notify, in writing, the superintendent of the District that the District's Mitigation Plan does not conform to the requirements of this Section and describing the deficiencies that need to be coxzectni. Any major changes in the District's Mitigation Plan must be approved by the DisU*ict's Board of Trustees. 3. Within 60 days foUowing the Director of Pinnnlng'S notification of the completeness of.the District's ~iga~on Plan, the Planning Commission shall review and consider the plan to determine whe~ller it conforms to the requirements of this Section and will reasonably mitigate the impacts of m~w development on school facilities. After considering the Mitigation Plan, the Commlssio~ shall recommend that the City Council approve, deny, condition, or continue the approval of the District's Mitigation Plan. R:~STAFFRPT~CHOLMIT.CC2 2/21/96 dwh 9 B. All residential development proposals that do not require a General PLan amendment, zone change, development agreement, pre~annexation agreement, or Specific Phn approval or amendment by the City shall be reviewed for their pote~tinl impact on school facilities as pan of the Initial Ellvilx}nmolltal Study process. Nothing in this resolution restricts the ability of the Director of Planning to determine that an otherwise exempt residential project may have a significant impact on the environment and that an Environmental Impact Report should be prepat~. No mitigation of school impacts beyond the mitigation identified in State law will be required for these projects. C. All residentis! development propo~ that require General Plan amendments, Specific Plans, Specific Plan amendments, development agreements, pre-annexation agreements, and changes of zone shah be reviewed for their potentinl impact on school facilities and the environment and the mitigation of those impacts in accordance with the requirements of State and Local law. 1. If a School Facility Impact Mitigation Agreement is required and an Agreement has not been submitted, the Director of Planning shah notify the applicant that the application is incomplete and that additional information (i.e. special study or elwironmental impact report) is required to assess the impacts on and mitigation of the effects of the development project on the DisU'ict's school facilities. 2. Within 30 days of the submitting an application, the Director of Planning shall notify the applicant that either: a. The proposed development project will not have a significant adverse impact on the District's school facilities or the environment, and that no additional special studies or supplemental mitigation agreement is required. b. The proposed development project will not have a significant adverse impact on the District's school facilities, but may have art adverse impact on the envirooment and that a special study or environmental impact ~ is required. c. The proposed development project could have an adverse impact on the District's school facilities and that a detailed impaa assessment and mitigation study must be prepared and/or a School Facility Impact Mitigation Agreement must be obtained. d. The proposed development project could have an adverse impact on the District's school facilities and/or the env'n'onment, and that a special study or an environmental impact report must be prepared and/or an Impact Mitigation Agreement is required. e. The proposed development project will have an adverse impact on the District' s school facilities and the environment and that a special study or an environmental impact report must be prepared. R:'~rI"AFFRPT',SCHOLMIT.CC2 2./21/SS dwh 11 1. District agrees that any claim, action, proceeding, etc., brought against the City which challenges the method of calculation of impact on school facilities in excess of that stamtorily mandated shall be the full and complete responsibility of the District. To that end, the District shall indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless the City against any loss, cost, expense, claim, damage, settlement, or judgment, resulting from a lawsuit or any part thereof, pertaining to the mount or method of calculation of such impact. 2. The City and District agree to share the cost on 50-50 basis of any action, challenge, claim, demand, or other legal proct~in~ brought against the City based upon the authority of the City to impose school miU'gation in excess of that required by State law. Section 6. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. Section 7. PASSED, APPROVE]), AND ADOFFED this 14th day of February, 1995. JEFFREY E. STONE MAYOR ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CAI-I!~ORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TIEMECULA I HERI~,Ry CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 14th day of February, 1995 by the following vote of the City Council: COlINCH -MEMBERS NOES: ABSENT: COUNTERS COUNCnMItMBERS R:XSTAFF~OI..MIT.CC2 2121/95 dwh 13 ATTACHMENT NO. 2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT R:~"TAFF~HOLMIT.CC2 2/21/96 dwh 14 Establish a procedure for the Council's review and approval of a proposed Mitigation Plan; and, Establish procedures on how the approved Mitigation Plan will be implementeo by the City. The proposed program was provided to, and reviewed by, the Temecula-Murrieta Coordinating Committee at their August 19, 1994 and September 2, 1994 meetings. The Coordinating Committee had no comments on the proposed Program. GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY The proposed resolution would establish the school facility impact mitigation program outlined in Implementation Measure C.3 of the Growth Management and Public Facilities Element. As a result, adoption of the proposed program is consistent with the a0opted City General Plan. A copy of the school facility related General Plan Implementation Measures are included in Attachment No. 2. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION The proposed resolution does not have the potential to cause a significant and adverse impact on the environment. Therefore, the Director of Planning has determined that the project is exempt from California Environmental Quality Act, pursuant to Section 15061 (b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines. Attachments: 1. PC Resolution No. 94- - Blue Page 3 2. Growth Management/Public Facility Element Implementation Measure C.3 - Blue Page 14 R:L%'TAF1;It.R'L~OLMIT.I~C 10/13/94 Ir. lb 2 ATTACHMENT NO. 3 MINUTES FROM THE NOVEMBER 7, 1994 MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION R:%STAF~CHOLMIT,CC2 2/21/95 dwh 15 pT-ANNI'N6 CO;'~fMISSION I',i'I'NYJTF-~; Noven-:~er 7. 1994 /m----l Chairwan Ford r, q3mssed concern that the Commission did not receive a copy of :he County Resolution 93-13 I. Chairman Ford stated that he did not see a provision for an annual review. He further stated that there was no joint nmendment clause, no recision, no suspension, no supersede clause or subsequent clause. City Amy Diaz stated this is an agreement not a contract and these features are not normally necessary. Chairman Ford x?.iterated his concern and stated that the object was to structure an agreement between the City and School District for a common good, and an anntlal review should he inchIdeal in the agreemenL lVIr. Diaz stated it conld he added with no problem. Chairman Ford opened the public he~ring at 8:09 P.M. David G~ll~gher, lapl'(S{ntntive for Temecula Valley Unified School District CrVUCD) came befor~ the Commission to answer any questions. Dennis Chlni~ueff, Kernper Community Development, 27555 Ynez Road, Suite 202, Temeafia, stated he wanted to work with the community and the School District to ensure facilities are in place. Phil Oberbnndsley with Lorenz, P, lhn6eff, Cannon, and Rose represen~g Kernper Community Development, requested that the Commission drier action at this time, to. a workshop to discuss the language to be used. Mr. Larry Markham, xcptz.v=nting Johnson Machinery, requested a continuance until they have had time to review the document Mr. Dave C-~ll~ghq- stated that the mitigation plan requires the School District to pursue all avenues of funding. Commi-~sioner Fahey asked Mr. Gallagher about the sunounding taxes for both new and old homes. Mr. C~11~gb.-r ~ that the home pays for the schools. Commissioner Ford asked Mr. Gallagher if the School District would have a problem with a yearly review of the mitigation. Mr. Gnll,gher suggested a review on a project by project basis. Commissioner Ford ask ff time District would he willing to forward a copy of the mitigation agreement. Mr. C,~n~gher responded that the City has a copy of the County agreement which is nearly idensic~!. Chainnan Ford closed the lmblic hearing at 8:37 P.M. R:~um~II0794.N..N 7 DRAFT ATTACHMENT NO. 4 PUBLIC FACILITY ELEMENT IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES R:'~STAFFRPT'q~,CHOIJVlIT.CC2 2121/95 dwh 16 ITEM 16 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Council Mary Jane McLarney, Assistant City Manager February 28, 1995 Contract for User Fee and Development Impact Fee Study RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the contract with David M. Griffith and Associates (DMG) to conduct a user fee and development impact fee analysis. That the City Council appropriate $39,340 from General Fund fund balance to account number 001 - 140-999-5248 (Consulting) to fund this contract· BACKGROUND: When the City incorporated, the City Council approved the County of Riverside's public facilities fee schedule. To date, the City has been collecting Development Impact Fees per this adopted ordinance (Ord. 659), as well as, collecting a public facilities fee deposit from developers with the understanding that the deposit accounts would be reconciled when the City adopts an updated development impact fee schedule. However, some developments pay development impact fees pursuant to specific development agreements, which were adopted by Council. The public facility, or development impact fee, is required to ensure that City facilities and infrastructure will be adequate to meet the needs of future development in the City. The City also collects fees for services rendered in planning, building and safety, engineering and recreation. A comprehensive user fee study should be conducted to ensure that the City is not overcharging in compliance with A.B. 1660 or undercharging for services rendered as well as provide a cost allocation plan for determining overhead costs. This is a requirement for federal and state funding. In 1992, a consulting firm was retained to conduct both a user fee and development impact fee study. However, the consultant never delivered an acceptable product, therefore, it was never adopted. By selecting the industry leader, David M. Griffith & Associates, Ltd., and requiring a very detailed scope of work (attached) with accurate cost figures, staff is doing everything possible to ensure that the City will have a defensible, accurate report on which to base policy decisions relating to fees and charges. R:~.Ah'~IDAWrAFF$.MI$ 2~21~ FISCAL IMPACT: The total cost of this contract, including expenses of ~7,900, is not to exceed ~89,340. The Finance Department has budgeted $50,000 for this project; therefore, $39,340 must be requested from the General Unappropriated Fund balance into the Consulting Services account #001-140-999-5248. In addition, if the City Council chooses Alternative Bid 1 and/or 2, an additional appropriation from fund balance of ~5,000to $15,000, will be required. R:XLAItlEI. DA'SFAFFS.M~ 2'21/95 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES This Agreement was made and entered inW this 28th day of March, 1995, by and between the City of Temecula ("City"), a municipal corporation, and David M. Griffith & Associates. Ltd. (DMG) a Professional Services Firm for the Public Sector ("Consultant"). The parties hemto mutually agree as follows: 1. Services. Consultant shall perform the tasks set forth in Attachment A. 2. Performance. Consultant shall at all times, faith~lly, industrially and to the best of his ability, experience 'and talent, perform all tasks described herein. 3. Payment. The City agrees to pay Consultant for actual work performed at the rates set forth in Attachment A. This mount will not exceed $10,000 for the total term of the Agreement unless additional payment is approved by the City Council; provided that the City Manager may approve additional payment not to exceed $5,000. Consultant will submit an invoice at the conclusion of actual services performed. .Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of invoice. 4. Amendments. This Agreement may be amended so long as such amendment is in writing and agreed upon by both the City Manager and Consultant. 5. Ownership Of Documents. Upon satisfactory completion of, or in the event of termination, suspension or abandonment of, this Agreement, all original documents, designs, drawings and notes prepared in the course of providing the services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission of the Consultant. 6. Termination. The City may terminate this Agreement without cause so long as written notice of intent to terminate is given to Consultant at least three (3) days prior to the termination date. In the event of termination, Consultant shall be paid for the services performed. R:IJd~IIERDAx. AGR-05'B.MI~ 7. Indemnification. The Consultant agrees to defend, inde~nnify and save harmless the City of Temecula, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, losses, defense cost, or liability of any kind or nature which the City, its officers, agents and employees may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of Consultant's negligent acts or omissions under the terms of this Agreement, excepting only liability arising out of the sole negligence of the City. 8. Status of Consultant. Consultant is an independent contractor in all respects in the porfonnance of this Agreement and shall not be considered an employee of the City for any purpose. No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the performance of thi.~ Agreement. Exc~t as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay ~laries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for performing services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnifi~tion to Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder. 9. Term. This Agreement shall commence on February 28, 1995, and shall remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than December 31, 1995. 10. Subcontracts. The Consultant shall not enter into any subcontracts for servict~s to be rendered toward the completion of the Consultant's portion of thi.~ Agreement without the consent of the City. At all times, Richard L. Pearl shall be primarily responsible for the performance of the tasks described herein. Consultant shall provide City with fourteen (14) days' notice prior to the departure of Richard L. Pearl. Joseph Colfan or Robert V. Reed from Consultant's employ. Upon such notice, the City shall have the option to immediately terminate this Agreement. Upon termination of this Agreement, Consultant's sole compensation shall be for the value of service rendered to the City. 11. Default. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under the terms of this Agreement, the City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work performed after the date of default. Default shall include not performing the tasks described herein to the reasonable satisfaction of the City Manager of the City. Failure by the Consultant to make pwgress in the performance of work hereunder, if such failure arises out of causes beyond his control, and without fault or negligence of the Consultant, shall not be considered a default. written. Consultant shall secure workers' compensation insurance. Licenses. Consultant warrants that it maintains all necessary licenses. The parties hereto have executed thk Agreement on the date and year above CONSULTANT By: Title A1TF_,ST: By: Ronald E. Bradley city June S. Greek, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney R:~LANI]~DA~AOR-0$A.MI~ 1/218S DAVID M. GR~ & ASSOCIATES, LTD. 5715 Marconi Avenue, Suite A · Carmichael, CA 95608 · (916) 485-8 102 · Fax (916) 485-0111 Ms. Mary Jane Mc Larney Assistant City Manager City of Temecula 43 174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 February 14, 1995 Dear Ms. McLarnq, This document consolidates our separately submitted original qualifications statement, bid proposal, and time line for the user fee/development impact fee study, and the parks and streets future operating expense analysis. 1. General Qu~ltfications DMG was founded 19 years ago and has grown inW one of the largest consulting firms in the nation in its fields of specialty. Since 1975, we have grown from a single office with five employees to a firm of over 275 professional staff operating in 25 offices throughout the United States. We currently senre about one-half of the state governments and over 1,500 local governments including cities, counties, and special districts. In California, we have provided consulting services to all 58 counties and over 225 cities and spedal districts. DMG HIGHLIGHTS => Largest firm providing management & fmancial advice exclusively to local government => Experienced in operating and capital cost/ => revenue environment. ::> Knowledgeable consultants ~ Results oriented Our Western Region Office is headquartered in Sacramento (Carmichael), California. We also have offices in Pasadena, Cupertino, and Olympia, Washington. Our Western Region staff includes 34 professionals. The Region serves clients in California, Oregon, Washington, Nevada, Utah, and Hawaii. The firm is organized around a limited number of services. The philosophy of the fwrn has been to specialize in a few areas and do them extremely well. Our Westem Region is led by Mr. J. Bradley Wilkes and is organized around specific areas of service: NORTH BROOK, ILLINOIS · CARMICHAEL, CALIFORNIA · RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA · IRVING, TEXAS · COLUMBUS, OHIO · ATLANTA, GEORGIA DENVER, COLORADO" MIDLOTHIAN. VIRGINIA · OLYMPIA, WASHINGTON · PASADENA, CALIFORNIA · PHOENIX, ARIZONA · TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA Cost o.f Service and User Fee, AB 1600 Development Impact Fee Analysis, Operations knprovement, State Mandated Cost Reitnbursement, Disaster Grants Consulting, Utility Rate Analysis, Executive Search, and Human Resources. Scope of Services and Deliverable Products DMG will analyze the following areas: Overhead calculation - produce indirect cost allocation plans that: (1) conform to OMB A-87 guidelines for charging federal and'state grants and (2) a Full Cost plan for charging user fee applications and the redevelopment agency. Operations f~s - all current and potential fees in: planning, building & safety, engineering, and recreation. DMG will design building and safety fees that will conform to the C_~!ifornia State Attorney General's Opinion (92-506) 4 Development 4,~paet fees - transportation, drainage, parks, and community facilities. At the conclusion of the engagement, DMG will submit formal reports on our findings and recommendations, and present same to the city council and citizen/business groups. DMG understands that the final goal of the project is passage of a viable fee program. We are attuned to the political reality that local government must operate in. While our analysis of costs are straight fortyard and clearly defensible, fee recommendations are tempered with potential realistic accomplishments. DMG studies are exceptionally effective because they are .ac_c.e.p.t.a___bl_e_ to management, the city council, and the comm..unity. 2 SECTION I DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES A. SCOPE OF SERVICE In general, this study will require the consultant to prepare a report documenting the need for City facilities required to support future development in Temecula, and to calculate impact fees that equitably allocate the capital costs of those facilities to new development in accordance with the requirements of AB 1600 {Government Code 66000, et seq.), and with applicable constitutional requirements. DMG will also provide assistance and samples of documents required for adoption and implementation of the impact fee program. The preparation of a development impact fee program involves organizing, analyzing and interpreting data relating to the impacts of development on capital facility and infrastructure needs in the City of Temecula. DMG will base its analysis on information provided by the City or readily available from other sources. The impact fee study proposal is based on the following assumptions regarding the scope of work: The consultant's work does not include legal or appraisal services, preparation of land use surveys, facility master plans, planning or engineering studies, detailed cost estimates, or analysis of raw data. 2. Impact fees will be prepared for the following types of facilities: Transportation Facilities Drainage Facilities Park and Recreation Facilities Community Facilities {City Hall and Corporation Yard) All impact fees will be calculated on a Citywide basis, or for a service area. single The City will provide the consultant with data on existing and planned land uses, development projections, facility standards and master plans, existing facilities, and estimated facility costs. Data, assumptions and policy decisions relied on by the consultant will not change in the course of the study. The proposed cost includes two presentations to the City Council, community groups, trade groups or others as directed by the City. Those presentations would be in addition to the routine site visits and meetings with staff, and others, which would occur in the course of preparing the study. If additional presentations are requested, they will be billed on a time and expenses basis. In the event that impact fees adopted by the City as a result of the impact fee study are the subject of legal action, the consultant will make appropriate staff available to support the City in defending those fees.' HoWever, involvement in such a legal action is beyond the scope of this proposal, and would be billed on a time and expenses basis at the then, prevailing billing rates. Information resources typically needed from the City in the preparation of this type of study include the following: Use, Circulation, Housing and , General Plan, especially Land Public Facilities elements , Development policy documents, specific plans, EIR's or other planning studies · Existing land use surveys and statistics · Census data and other demographic and economic studies · Facility master plans and engineering studies , Inventory of existing capital facilities and equipment · Capital Improvement Program and current City Budget · Base maps of the study area and facility service areas B. WORK PROGRAM The following work program outlines in general the technical approach to by used by DMG in the completion of this study. 4 1. PREPARATION OF DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE PROGRAM Task 1. Project Initiation To initiate the engagement in a manner that will assure a clear understanding by the consultants of the City's goals and expectations and establish the working relationship required for timely and successful completion of the study, the DMG project manager will meet with key City staff at the inception of the project to discuss the Citys goals and objectives, refine the scope, work plan and schedule, identify staff contacts and information resources, and discuss impact fee methodologies. TASK/CONSULT RATE HOURS COST $ $ $ TASK 1 Colgan 110 12 1,320 Chinn 85 0 0 SUBTOTAL 12 1,320 Task 2. Fami!l--ization In the early stages of the work, the Project manager will become familiar with existing City facilities as well as the geography, road system, physical characteristics, development patterns, and general layout of the study area. DMG consultants will also review available planning documents, demographic data, economic projections, facility plans and other relevant information, and consult with the staff, to become familiar with City policies and information resources relevant to this project. TASK/CONSULT RATE TASK 2 $ Colgan 110 Chinn 85 SUBTOTAL HOURS $ COST $ 8 880 0 0 8 880 Task 3. Land Use Assumptions and Development Projections Information on existing and projected land uses and development must be organized and analyzed to provide a basis for calculating impact fees. DMG will assemble and correlate relevant information on land uses, population, housing, employment and traffic, and document planning assumptions (e.g. average residential densities, persons per household, jobs per household, floor area ratios, etc.) to be used in assessing development potential. 5 TASK/CONSULT RATE_ HOURS COST TASK 3 $ $ $ Colgan 110 40 4,400 Chinn 85 0 0 SUBTOTAL 40 4,400 Task 4. Level of Service Standards. DMG will review level-of-sezvice standards used in establishing facility needs and inco_rporate them in the methodology used to calculate the impact fees. TASK/CONSULT RATE HOURS COST TASK 4 $ $ $ Colgan 110 16 1,760 Chinn 85 16 1,360 SUBTOTAL 32 3,120 Task 5. Define Improvement Needs Related to Future Development. DMG will assist the City to identify improvement needs related to future development, and determine costs eligible for impact fee funding. TASK/CONSULT RATE HOURS COST TASK 5 $ $ $ Colgan 110 48 5,280 Chinn 85 24 2,040 SUBTOTAL 72 7,320 Task 6. Calculate Impact Fees and Prepaxe Documentation. In order to calculate impact fees that comply with AB 1600, DMG will define an al~propriate method of cost allocation for each type of facility, calculate fees, document the justification for each type of fee, and prepare an impact fee report. That report will include fee schedules, summary of development potential, explanation of methodology, and documentation of a "reasonable relationship" between the fees and the impacts of future development. A draft of the impact fee report will be submitted for review by the City. TASK/CONSULT RATE HOURS COST TASK 6 $ $ $ Colgan 110 60 6,600 Chinn 85 40 3,400 SUBTOTAL 100 10,000 6 Task 7, Implementation Assistance. DMG will assist the City in implementation of the impact fee program by providing samples of adoption documents, and recommendations on procedures for adoption, collection and expenditure of fees, capital budgeting, indexing and updating of fees, and accounting and reporting requirements under the Government Code. TASK/CONSULT RATE HOURS COST TASK 7 $ $ $ Colgan 110 16 1,760 Chinn 85 0 0 SU BTOTAL 16 1,760 Task 8. Public Meetings and Presentations. DMG will attend public meetings and make presentations to the City Council or other groups as requested by the City. TASK/CONSULT RATE HOURS COST TASK 8 $ $ $ Colgan 110 24 2,640 Chinn 85 0 0 SUBTOTAL 24 2,640 The total projected cost for the development impact fee component is shown below: TASK/CONSULT RATE HOURS COST GRAND TOTAL 304 31,440 TOTAL HOURS Colgan Chinn 224 80 304 In addition to the professional fees noted above, expenses will be billed at actual cost plus a 10% administrative fee. Total expenses will not exceed $2,900. 7 The attached schedule shows estimated Completion times for Tasks 1-6. Tasks 7 and 8 would be scheduled at the City's convenience. Project Schedule City of Temecula Impact Fee Study TASK; 'Month I ~ ' Month 2 " Month 3 '~E'~"'~ .... ' ...........................................' ......' ...............................~ ........ Task 2 Task 4 ra,k s ". 0. L.. i.... :I l' ;..' I"0 '.!' '1 . I~.~.! Task 6 __! .... Month 4 Notes 0 in schedule indicates meeting with City staff. <> in schedule indicates submittal of technical memo or report at completion Of task. 8 E. STAFFING The impact fee study will be staffed by consultants based in DMG's SacramenW office. Specific staffing for this project is described below, and resumes of assigned staff, are provided elsewhere in this proposal. PROJECT DIRECTOR o As indicated in the previous section on the Operations Fees and Charges Analysis, the project director for this study will be Richard L Pearl. Mr. Pearrs qualifications and experience are described in that section. PROJECT MANAGER - Joseph Colgan, AICP. The Project Manager is responsible for the day-to-day supervision of the engagement. The Project Manager for the impact fee study will participate directly and extensively in the analytical work and report preparation, and will coordinate the work with City staff, and present the findings and recommendations of the study. The Project Manager for the impact fee study will be Joe Colgan. Mr. Colgan is a Project Manager in the Sacramento office of DMG. He is a professional planner with more than ten years experience in local government planning agencies, and has extensive experience in capital facilities planning and financing. He has been preparing impact fee studies under AB 1600 since 1989, and during that time has managed more than fifteen impact fee engagements for clients in California, Oregon, Utah and Florida. Mr. Colgan has presented workshops and lectures on development impact fees, and has broad-based knowledge of impact fee methodology and documentation. PROJECT STAFF - Additonal staff support for the impact fee study will be provided as required by an experienced staff of DMG consultants. The team assigned W the operational fee analysis will provide support in the area of budget analysis. In addition, an engineering specialist will be assigned to support the analytical effort. ENGINEERING SPECIALIST - Robert U. Reed, P.E. is a Project Manager in the Sacramento office of DMG. Mr. Reed specializes in the areas of impact fees and utility rate analysis. He has managed both impact fee and utility rate studies, including projects for major clients such as the dties of Los Angeles and Seattle. Mr. Reed will provide support in the interpretation of facility master plans, and the evaluation of service standards as require in this study. SECTION II COST ALLOCATION PLAN/USER FEE ANALYSIS SCOPE The DMG fee and charges analysis includes two distinct components: a cost allocation plan, and the user fee (fee-for-service)analysis. Cost allocation plan - indirect (support) costs This analysis distributes central service and other administrative support costs to the users of those services. Typical service providers include finance, dry manager, purchasing, facility maintenance, personnel, city attorney, etc. The list is sometimes expanded to include departmental administration, i.e. public works administration, community development administration, etc. The objective of the analysis is to determine the full costs of providing "line" services. Indirect overhead allocations identified in the cost plan are distributed to program direct costs to determine full costs. An added benefit of the DMG approach is that management can now also see how much it costs to provide staff services. This information may be helpful in addressing the issue of contract services: fleet, data processing, maintenance, payroll, among others. Other uses of the plan are (1) to charge indirect overhead to federal and state grants and {2) to charge redevelopment agencies and enterprise funds their fair share of support costs. Examples of grant cost recovery areas are: CDBG, gas tax, and SB 90 state mandated cost claiming. User Fee Analysis The purpose of a user fee study is to determine the full cost of services offered by the agency for which user fees are currently being charged or could be charged. The full cost is then compared to current revenues to determine the amount of subsidy {or occasionally, overcharge). With this knowledge decisions can be made concerning appropriate fee adjustments. DMG can assist in understanding economic issues such as elasticity of demand and can provide information on what others are charging. However, in the final analysis, the actual decision to increase or decrease fees is a local decision. 10 At the conclusion of the above analysis DMG will prepare a report of our findings and present fee recovery recommendations. The report will include current fees and recovery levels as a percentage of full costs, full costs, recommended fees, and remaining subsidy. DMG will provide a fee adoption schedule and plan. We will assist the City with an implementation strategy. DETAILED WORK PLAN Following is our detailed work plan, time estimate, and cost breakdown. Please note, however, that the estimates are for planning purposes only. PHASE I: DET.Art-ED ANALYSIS During Phase I, DMG will conduct the service cost identification and cost analysis. The specific tasks involved are described in the following paragraphs. TASK 1: PROJECT INITIATION In our first task we will carry out those activities required to begin the engagement in a manner that will ensure timely and successful project completion. Included are the following: Meet with the City Manager, Finance Director, and others as appropriate to discuss the goals, objectives, and overall scope of the engagement. Our designated Project Manager will represent DMG in this initial meeting. It is important that the City be represented by individuals who will be most directly concerned with the ultimate engagement results. Based upon this meeting, we will fmalize the scope of the engagement. Any significant variations will be documented in writing and provided to the City. · Establish project liaison requirements 11 TASK/CONSULTANT RATE HOURS COST $ $ TASK 1 Pead 150 8 1,200 Payton 95 6 570 Wakefield 85 6 510 SUBTOTAL 20 2,280 TASK 2: ESTABLISH PROJECT LIAISONS The revenue related services to be analyzed are carried out in various departments and budget units. DMG methods focus of efforts at the department level. We stress a full understanding of all requirements for providing each of the City's specific services. It is important to have a departmental liaison within each of the major departments to work with us during the engagement. This ensures our interpretations are correct and assists us in finding the appropriate records to review or individuals to talk to. TASK/CONSULTANT RATE HOURS COST $ $ TASK 2 Pearl 150 0 0 Payton 95 4 380 Wakefield 85 0 0 SUBTOTAL 4 380 TASK 3: DEVELOP COST ALLOCATION PLANS DMG will prepare two cost allocation plans: a Full Cost central service cost allocation plan for use in determining overhead charges to all City programs for primary use in calculating full costs for the user fee study, and an OMB A-87 plan for use in intergovernmental grants. The DMG cost allocation plan methodology is the double step down, cross allocation methodology, which is the most rigorous and comprehensive of the distribution options contained in Federal Circular OMB A-87 (the "bible" of cost allocation distribution systems). 12 TASK/CONSULTANT RATE HOURS COST $ $ TASK 3 Pearl 150 0 0 Payton 95 40 3,800 Wakefield 85 60 5, 100 SU BTOTAL 100 8,900 TASK 4: DEVELOP SCHEDULE OF SERVICE AREAS TO BE ANALYZED In task 4 DMG will develop a schedule of the City's current user fees. In addition, a listing of potential user fees will also be developed. Our experience in working with California cities will aid in the development of this list. DMG uses "check lists" of fees found in other cities m assist in identifying potential fee areas. TASK/CONSULTANT RATE HOURS COST $ $ TASK 4 Pearl 150 0 0 Payton 95 8 760 Wakefield 85 0 0 SUBTOTAL 8 760 TASK 5: DEVELOP DIRECT SERVICE COSTS For each activity, where a revenue producing service is being performed {or a non-revenue producing service for which a fee could be imposed), DMG will develop the direct costs of providing the service. Direct costs generally include salaries and benefits of those individuals actually performing the service and any services and supplies that can be directly attributable to the service. To the extent possible, it is our desire to identify as many costs as possible as direct and treat the remaining costs where appropriate as indirect. Based upon our extensive experience, we know that most supervisorial and service and supply costs will be treated as indirect costs. In any 13 case, a hallmark of the DMG approach is a fully substantiated cost analysis. TASK/CONSULTANT RATE HOURS COST $ $ TASK 5 Pearl 150 8 1,200 Payton 95 110 10,450 Wakefield 85 8 680 SUBTOTAL 126 12,330 TASK 6: DISTRIBUTE DEPARTMENT/PROGRAM OVERHEAD COSTS In Task 6, indirect costs will be distributed to each service or activity. In general, these costs reflect supervision occurring at the department/division/program level and associated services and supplies. DMG's approach to this distribution depends on the complexity of the governmental unit being analyzed. The overall distribution of costs is accomplished using DMG's FASTR System. This system is the most comprehensive tool available to analyze governmental service costs. TASK/CONSULTANT RATE HOURS COST $ $ TASK 6 Pearl 150 0 0 Payton 95 5 475 Wakefield 85 5 425 SU BTOTAL 10 900 TASK 7: MATCH SERVICE REVENUE WITH SERVICE COSTS In this task, the total cost of each service is matched with the total revenue received from each service. In its basic form, the resulting table illustrates the total tax subsidy associated with each senrice. The table provides a departure point for use in fee discussions and the development of consultant and staff recommendations. 14 TASK/CONSULTANT RATE HOURS COST $ $ TASK 7 Pearl 150 0 0 Payton 95 5 475 Wakefield 85 5 425 SUBTOTAL 10 900 TASK 8: REVIEW COST, REVENUE, AND SUBSIDIES WITH DEPARTMENTS The cost, revenue and subsidy analysis developed by DMG are based upon information supplied by the City's departments. In Task 8, we ereturn to each department to review the preliminary results. We believe this to be an extremely important step as it is the departments that must ultimately be comfortable with DMG's cost analysis and methods. Based upon the departmental reviews, changes will be made as appropriate. TASK/CONSULTANT RATE HOURS COST $ $ Pearl 150 8 1,200 Payton 95 16 1,520 Wakefield 85 14 1,190 SUBTOTAL-TASK 8 38 3,910 TASK 9: REVIEW COST AND REVENUE RELATIONSHIP WITH CITY MANAGEMENT In a simplistic approach, the City could raise its user fees in order to eliminate the subsidy depicted in the subsidy table. There are a number of issues associated with doing this that must be taken into consideration. Among others, there are the following: , It may not be politically feasible to raise a particular fee. , It may not be legal to raise a particular fee. 15 An undesirable social consequence may result from raising a particular fee (i.e. a group _may be excluded from a desired service). An undesirable economic consequence my result (i.e. an increase in fee may result in less revenue due to decreasing demand). In Task 9 the possible consequences of each potential action will be discussed with the Project Advisory Group and other management individuals. Based upon these discussions and DMG's experience, recommendations will be formulated. TASK/CONSULTANT RATE HOURS COST $ $ Pearl 150 12 1,800 Payton 95 16 1.520 Wakefield 85 6 510 SUBTOTAL-TASK 9 34 3,830 e PHASE II: IMPL~'-M~'-NTATION In Phase II of the engagement, DMG will work with the City in the development of an implementation program. Tasks required to implement this program and close out the engagement are described below. TASK 10: DEVELOP IMPLEMENTATION _ STRATEOY ;L A hallmark of the DMG approach to all of our engagements is to facilitate change. In terms of a user fee analysis, this generally means fee increases that result in additional general fund revenues. Despite our extensive experience in similar efforts, we fmd that each client desires to proceed somewhat differently when it comes to implementation. In Task 10 we will work with top management to develop an implementation strategy that will reflect the City of Temecula's needs. 16 TASK/CONSULTANT RATE HOURS COST $ $ Pead 150 6 900 Payton 95 16 1,520 Wakefield 85 0 0 SUBTOTAL-TASK 10 22 2,420 TASK 11: PREPARE AND PROVIDE DRAFT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Our standard procedure is to provide our project report to our clients in draft form. This step offers an opportunity to discuss individual recommendations in detail. Based upon these discussions, the draft report will be modified as required and submitted in final form. TASK/CONSULTANT RATE HOURS COST $ $ Pearl 150 4 600 Payton 95 24 2,280 Wakefield 85 16 1,360 SUBTOTAL-TASK 11 44 4,240 TASK 12: PRESENT FINAL REPORT The product from the proposed engagement is often controversial. The subject of fees for service raises many important considerations within the governmental bureaucracy, at the political level, and with the public. We believe it is extremely important that all parties fully understand the basis for and rationale behind the project findings and recommendations. To this end, DMG is committed to providing all interested parties with an understanding of our approach and results. This typically requires: A presentation to management with less emphasis on detailed methodology, but greater emphasis on the impact of recommendations and implementation strategies. Engagement presentation to the City Council to provide an overview of the project and its findings. Any questions concerning the project will be answered at this time. For costing purposes we have assumed 17 that two presentations will be required. Additional presentations will be charged on a time-and-expense basis. TASK/CONSULTANT RATE HOURS COST $ $ Pearl 150 12 1,800 Payton 95 9 855 Wakefield 85 0 0 SUBTOTAL- TASK 12 21 2,655 TASK 13: PROJECT CLOSE OUT In the final task we perform those activities necessary to ensure successful project completion. Included are: Remaining questions are answered. · Update requirements and strategies are discussed. A recommended adoption resolution (actual resolution or ordinance to be drafted by the dty attorney. · Implementation strategies The above tasks summarize the activities necessary to accomplish the work described. We emphasize that we remain flexible in all of our engagements. Consequently, ff this work plan does not specifically meet your needs, please advise us so that we may revise our approach as required. TASK/CONSULTANT RATE HOURS COST $ $ Pearl 150 6 900 Payton 95 6 570 Wakefield 85 0 0 SUBTOTAL- TASK 13 12 1,470 18 e MAJOR PROJECT MILESTONES & PROJECT REVIEW MEETINGS The principal milesWnes of the engagement are described below. These milestones also represent potential project review meetings. Draft User Fee Report - DMG reviews draft findings with the departments on a department by department basis. When these have been completed an overall draft report is provided. Upon review the draft report is fmalized. Presentation to the City Council - The final step in the process is the presentation of results to the City Council. DMG anticipates approximately three months to present its findings to management. Presentation timing of the final document to the city council is a client decision. The total projected cost for the cost plan/user fee component is shown below. TASK/CONSULTANT TOTAL Pearl Payton Wakefield GRAND TOTAL RATE HOURS COST 150 64 9,600 95 265 25,200 85 120 10,200 449 45,000 Expenses will be billed at actual cost plus a 10% administrative charge. Expenses will be limited to $5,000. We expect to come under the limit as Erin Payton, the project manager for this engagement, will also be working concurrently on the Riverside County Building and Safety fee analysis. C. ADDITIONAL TASK The City has requested that DMG analyze the operating and maintenance costs associated with future expansions of the parks and streets systems. DMG will accomplish this task and issue a separate report on this subject. This task will be charged on a time and expense basis with a maximum fee of $5,000. 19 D. UPDATE OPTIONS Due to the DMG analytical method used to determine fee for service activities (standard costs) it is not typically necessary to recalculate the fees for several (4-5) years. This is because the work efforts do not change from year to year. It is important, however, to adjust fees annually based on the C.P.I.' DMG does offer its computer programs under a perpetual lease arrangement ($5,000 for each system). We urge all our clients to wait several years before making any lease decision. DMG also provides technical assistance in the fee determination {with client support) at a reduction from the original fee - depending on the client's level of input. E. DMG STAFF The combined user fee/development impact fee study will be under the overall direction of Mr. Richard L. Pearl, a vice president of the company and responsible for the Western Region's cost and revenue enhancement division. The cost plan/user fee component will be managed by Ms. Erin Payton, a project manager with DMG and Ms. Candace Bonney and/or Mr. Jeffery Wakefield as additional support. 2O ITEM 17 APPROVAL R~ CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFIC CITY MANAGE CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Manager/City Council Mary Jane McLarney, Assistant City Manager February 28, 1995 Adhoc Committee for Community Services Funding RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council appoint two members of the Council to serve on an Adhoc Committee to review Community Services Funding Applications. BACKGROUND: Subsequent to awarding the Community Services Funding Grant Applications on November 29, the City received two additional applications, Assistance League of Temecula Valley and the Riverside County Child Care Consortium. If the City Council desires to consider these applications, staff requests Council to appoint two members to review the applications. The committee will meet only one time. FISCAL IMPACT: As of February 28, 1995, $22,500 is available in the FY 1995 Community Services Funding budget. R:\eyerek\edhoc.cef ITEM 18 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Mary Jane McLarney, Assistant City Manager February 28, 1995 Request for Funding for the Temecula Valley Film Council RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council consider a funding request for the Temecula Valley Film Council. BACKGROUND: The Film Council has requested a $24,000 operating grant for the Fiscal Year 1994-95. The detail of the operating budget is included in the attached application. The application was originally submitted under the Community Services Funding Program and was referred to the Economic Development Program. As the Film Council has not identified any other funding sources, staff would only recommend a matching grant not to exceed $10,000. This would provide incentive to the Film Council to establish and prove their fund raising ability. A $10,000 grant would, in staff's opinion, be appropriate for the return the City could expect to receive from film crews visiting the City. In addition, the Film Council also requested $15,000 in funding for a Film Festival in September 1995. Upon review of both requests, staff initially recommended a matching grant of $ 5,000 for each purpose. However, the Director of the Film Council has requested that the entire sum be allocated to the Film Council operating budget. FISCAL IMPACT: Staff recommendation would provide up to $10,000 in matching funds to the Film Council for operations as described in the attachment. ATTACHMENT: Temecula Valley Film Council Community Services Funding Application CITY OF TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICE FUNDING PROGRAM APPLICATION (Please Print or Type). (1) $3,500 (2) $5,000 Amount Requested: $ m~l -nm~.n~- · ~94. 1) Location Scouting/Library Project Name: 4) Print Media Advertisin~ Project Sta~ing Date: JUly, 1994 June, 1995 Project Ending Date: (3) $10,000 (4) 2 ) FAM Tours 3 ) 5 ) AFCI Membership i_"' -- $5,000 (5') $500.00 Trade Shows ORGANiZATION'S BACKGROUND: Name of Organization: Mailing address: Telephone: (909) Number of paid staff -0-' Geographic area(s) served 699-6267 Temecula Valley Film Council 43174 Business Park Drive. Temecula, CA November 1992 Year Founded Number of volumeera 100f Temecula Valley 92590 is this organization incorporated in California as a non-profit organization? Yes x No If "yes": Date of incorporation as a non-profit Federal identification number December 10, 33-0539648 · If "no": Name of sponsoring organization Its federal identification number Its state identification number application has been authorized by the organization's: X Board of Directors Executive Committee - 1992 State identification number 17 16345 Inctude a copy of your statement of non-profit status from the State of California Members-at-large TEHECULA VALLEY FILN COUNCIL Financial Report July 31, 1994 Support & Revenue Current Month Year to Date Motocross Beverage Sales City of Temecula T-shirt Sales Disco Fundraiser Total Support & Revenue 15.00 15.00 25.50 8000.00 10.00 13A.00 8169.50 Expenses Motocross ABC Permit Promotional Insurance Disco Fundraiser Copies Postage Total Expenses Income less expenses Balance at beginning of year Total Balance 14.00 169.82 106.57 290.39 (275.39) 15.00 2721.49 1518.37 508.67 57.25 7.25 4828.48 3341.02 1965.50 $ 5306.52 Reconciliation July 31, 1994- Balance at end of prior month Income less expense (current month) Balance July 31, 1994 5581.91 (275.39) 5306.52 /Bank of America.., ~Z--~EMECULA VALLEY FILM COUNCIL O Daily Balance Amount Dale Date 06/20 $ 6,083.26 06/22 06/21 5,784.16 06/24 C;] Bank of America: In Balance To assist you in reconciling your account, we have prepared this personalized tool for you to use. Use it each month to balance your statement with your checkbook register. We have filled out'certain information to make it even more convenient for you! · Mark off each deposit, withdrawal, and check shown on this statement in your checkbook register. · Make sure that all transfers are written in your checkbook register, including automatic deposits. automatic payments, or transfers you made between accounts. Statement Period: June 18 through July 18, 1994 Account Number. 07239-03546 Amount Date 5.617.61 07/07 5,581.91 07113 1 Your ending balance from this statement 2 List deposits and credits that do not appear on this statement Oatt Amount Date Amount Total from 2: 3 Subtotal by adding I and 2 4 List outstanding checks, withdrawals. and debits that do not appear on this statement CIt~CI~ ;~ Amount ChiCK ;~ Amount 5.490.34 5,320.52 5,320.52 Total from 4: 5 Subtract 4 from 3. This should match the .balance in your checkbook register · '//"" oote4u.0o~2, Page 2 of 2 Briefly describe the goals and objectives of your organization and the major community services it provides. Include discussion regarding the specific ways your organization meets the city*s criteria listed on page 2, The mission ofthe Temec, dq Valley F'llm Council is to market Temecttla as a desirable, cooperative, efficient and mutti-fnct, z~ location desfinMion for the film, television and advertising industry by focusing on the unique and varied locations and services available. The goal is to further the imerests of Teznecula economic development by attracting the film industry' to our area, to act as a liaison between the film industry and the community, to provide a focal point for all film related inquiries, to prepare and provide a location library, production and service information to the industry, to educate local merchants to the opportunities of servicing the film industry and to promote the relocation of film companies to the area to generate new jobs. Criteria A. Does the organization provide community service excellence? The Temecttht Valley Ftlm Council has only been in existence since November, 1992 and offi_c-ln!ly incorl~rated as a non-profit corporation last December 10, 1993. 1993 was quite a year of accomplishments for the ~im Council. Through a lot of volunteer help and seed money from Eve Craig, Bob & Jeanne Burns, loSistics support from the Chamber of Commerce, and valuable funding from the City Council we were able to become a member of the Aasociation ofFHm Cotmnism'onen International, create a 4-color Locations postcard, create a TV/Film/Video Production Guide, produce 4 one- hour episodes of the Community Variety Show showcasing area talents, area events, area schools, area politics and area business. From the two marketing tools- locations postcard and production 8uide, the Fthn Council was able to generate interest, attention and actual production work in the area bene~tin$ not only the city and the business community but some of its residents as well. Based on ~t'es ~iven to the Fdm Council by Creative Alliance (Dunlop/Japans Golf Video), Vid-Co (Toyota, USA Car Commercial), Vamos Photography (Honda Civic'94) and Shoemaker Productions (Motocross), an estimated $96,000 was spent in our hotels, restaurants and support service-related businesses. Shoemaker Productions is still in Teaneath and has actually leased an office in town, and expanded not only to include Motocross racing but also Legends stock car racinF~ For 1994, with a grant from the city for $8,000, we were able to mail more production guides and postcards to production companies and location scouts, and attend the ShowBiz Expo at the Los Angeles Convention Center held last June 11-13, 1994. Below are some of the of inquiry calls, location requests, location scouting and actual location filming activities the film council has generated so far, for 1994: 1. Paramount Pictures location filming of *'Star Trek-The Next Generation" at Callaway V'meyards. This one ( 1 ) day filming shoot was a concerted effort between the localion scout, Callaway Vineyards, l~-mbossy Suites, Best Western and the Film Council. Portions were also shot in Idyllwild. l~.stimnted spending forthis shoot was $15, 860. 11. Still photo shoot for the rock band, Lstter Rei~'s album cover. Thornton W'mery and Howard Kauch's ~host town property on Pujol St. were used. Band members and crew had breakfast at Desmy's, lunch at Kosa's Canfinn, bread & wine at Thornton W'me~ and dinner at Claim Jumper. 12. Video FootaSe request of the Temecula W'meries from the Director of Sales Production Co. They are producinS a tourism protoo film for the California Division of Tou~snL This film will be distributed to tour operators and travel agen~es wo~dwide. The Film Council is aggressively working on convincin~ the production company to include other Temecula assets like Old Town, golf courses, lakes, etc. in their project. 1 :}. Inquiry and request for our Production Guide from Robert Curran of MGM Wo~dwide Television for future MGM film projects (see attached). 14. Photo Presen~tion request by Lynn Adelstein and F, mest Martin of Hollywood F~m Production for vineyards with woodedrustic muctures. We sent them pictures of Temecula Crest W'mery and Mount Palomar W'mery. This was a ShowBiz Expo lead. B. What is the size and make-up of the community based organization: The Temecula Valley Film Council consists of a Board of 11 Directors, and a Liaison Board which is represented by almost every selFnet of the community. There are no paid staff members. C. What is the public and crific~ea~tion to the group: Very positive. D. Does the organization have a high quality of fmcal management: Jim Meyler is the Film Council accountant. He is the Manager of the CP A firm of Donald McClean and Co., a regional accounting Fm Eve Craig, an active community resident is the Film Council treasurer. E. Will the organization have longevity in the City of Temecula: h is our intent to be a permanent and effective entity in the City. F. Is the CBO a non profit organization? Yes. G. Is there evidence of satisfactory service provided to city's citizen: Please see Item A. IL The CBO does not discriminate based on race, color, creed, nationality. sex, marital sums, disability, religion or political affdiafion. The Film Council does not discriminate. , City of Temecula Community Service Funding Program Project(s) needing funding How will your organization use any funding awarded? Give the project's objectives, number of persons served, area where services are provided, and number of volunteers involved. Be specific. Note any equipment or services that the award money would purchase and why it is needed. Please include a detailed budget and a schedule of significant activities' related to this project. Please attach a maximum of one double-spaced typewritten page of information if you need to expand your answer beyond this space. Please see attached Ci1T of Temecula " - Community Service Funding Program ~ =cstion Page 5 · . ""' ~/e hereby certify the information contained in this application is true to the best of our knowledge and belief. (Sign both if same) JO MOULTON, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR NAME AND TITLE (Please Print or Type) (Signatur of ir~dividual preparing application form) AND JO MOULTON, EXECUTIVE DTRRCTOR NAME AND TITLE (Please Print or Type) and (Sig zed Officer) TEMECULA VAL-LEY FILM COUNCIL (Organization Name) 43174 Business PArk Drive, Temecula, CA 92590 (Address of Organization) (909) 699-6267 Aug, 20, 1994 (Telephone) (Date) Return Completed Application to: City of Temecula Finance Department Community Service Funding Program 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, California 92590 (909) 694-6430 ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF TEMECULA VALL~.Y FILM COUNCIL FILt-'.D DEC 8-19 2 N, ARCH FONG EU, Secre'~ry of I 'The name of ~his corporation is Temecula Valler Film Council- II. · corporation is a nonprofit mutual benefit corporation A. This under the Nonpru~it Mutual Benefit Corpora=ion Law. The organized ,. · purpose of this corporation is to engage in any lawful act or activity for which a corporation may be org&nized under such law. B. The specific purpose of this corporation is to promote the Temec~la Valley area of Riverside County to the entertainment and advertising industries as a setting for shooting of films and relaUed activities. ' III The name and address in the State of California of this corporation's initial agent for service oZ process is: Christopher Willjams CHRIS WILLIAMS & ASSOCIATES 41689 Enterprise Circle North, Suite 114 Temecula, CA. 92590 IV Notwithstanding any of the above statements of purposes and powers, this corpora=ion shall not, except to an insubstantial degree, engage in any activities or exercise any powers that are not in furtherance of the specific purposes oE this corporation- 1 E0 'a e8~s6=-686~ 01 . AMSS aMOD S,,al,8011U '- iif ";Ce,3L/t V A L L E Y TENECULA VALLEY FILM FOR IMMEDIATE PBESS CONTACT: lO MOULTON/MAGGI (800) 814-4420 EXT. 8# / (909) 699-8681 COUNCIL FILM COUNCIL ~ LOCATIONS FOR UNIVERSAL STUDIOS MAJOR FEATURE FILM PROIECT The Temecuh Valley F'!lm Council recently received a request to find very specific location sites for a Universal Studios major feautre film project, scheduled to shoot for 31 days in November. Locations needed are: 1. A small town center (1-2 blocks long) in an agricultural area if possible (no desert). The shopping center has to have the appearance and feel of a San Joaquin Valley community. - 2. A lovely 2 story frame farm house with a porch built in the 1920's-1930's. 3. Eil~ht (8) houses in a neiBhborhood build in the 1940's with varying architectural styles. 4. A swimming pool built in the 1930's with a high dive ( if no diving board, the studio will build one) 5. A quarry or swimming hole wiffi an overhand that a diver could dive from into the water (mustbe a natural swimming hokeor quarry). The film council has found 3 out of the 5 location r~luests but would not mind other alternative sites. If you know of possible locations similar or close to the above, please contact Jo Moulton or MaSSi Alien of the Film Council at (909) 699-6267 as soon as possible. Help us secure this film for our area....start: searching! (909) 676-~O90 · Fax: (909) 694-O201 · After Hours: (909) 699-6267 Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce · 27450 Ynez Road, Suite 104 · Temecula, CA 92~91 V A L L E Y TEM ECULA VALLEY FIL~ FOK IMMEDIATE PRESS I~LEASE: T~necula Vall~ Film Council Contact: Jo Moulton (909) 699-6267 COUI'ICIL HOLLYWOOD PRODUCTION COMPANY LOOKS FOR BUILDINGS TO BLOW UP.w THE T~"v~ECULA VALLEY FILM COUNCIL HAS Bison CONTACTED BY A LOS ANG~T .F-S BASED PRODUCTION COMP~ TO ~-P SECURE LOCATIONS FOR AN ACTION FILM. SPECIFIC;J -~-Y, THE COMPANY IS SEAKCIiiNG FOR A "COMPOUND" LOCATION COMPRISED OF AN ABANDONED GROUP OF STRUCTURES THAT CAN BE BLOWN UP FOR TI-mm. CLIMACTIC SEQUENCE. ANY PKOPEKTY OWNEl{ IN THE AREA WITH A DESIRE TO RID ITSELF OF SOME UNWANTED BUILDINGS (I.E. FACTOKY, WAREHOUSES, GRAIN ELEVATO~ lVIINING OPERATIONS, MANUFACTURING PLANT) ARE ASIcFD TO CONTACT JO MOULTON OF TI-IE TEMECULA VAT J .F.y FILM COUNCIL AT (909) 699-6267, IlVIMEDIATELY. (909) 676-5090 TemecUi= valle.v Chamber · Fax: (909) Commerce 694-0201 * After liours: (909) 699-626T · Z7450 Ynez Road. Suite 104 · Temeculs. CA 92591 :' m~ n.44, · · REQUEST ~ Fex; 73g-2122 · . ., C,~iif'orrj~ Tr.~ ~ Commerce AFr,.~ INSTRUCTIONS: Be ee epe{Ifle ae you =an wire the fieerlptl=~ of t~ 16;~lon er laeeuane you ere '-' eeekffiS, At the end ~ eeah working day the CFC wiP fax yeue reduser ~ FU~ er=une ~e ltlle. PieMe epec~ how you want ~!C$ to respoAd t~ your ~y ~m Yeur N~ · de~ Yew -~~/~ ~ ~/~ / CIrcle One':~ ~ Series) ~ M~ie) (Commer;i~) (M~ (Still) (PSA) Ot~er: Urgen~ Fa~or, Circle One: ,. .... To MeteR: (Le, New EngLand, Aeries.',: d,,vo~;,y,,v~' ,A,/Out~C a~t~ ~v~ ~vAv/* Other Pans of the U.5. Being Scouted?: Y',-~'E' ,Vt~sre?,~,~:l/-:'.~,'f .~,~r",H,ir , .-../= J' AcldZtlonel informalien Neecle~ .... Permits:_ Crew/Personnel: I realize that you are very busy and ~his information is not related to any specific project. However, we will be producing several films in coming months and your ma=erial will help us to determine which loca=ions are best suited for these projects. If you have any questions, please feel free to contac% me at (310) 449-3769- Thank you for your assis=ance and I look forward to hearing from you soon. ~t M. Curtc~n Manager-Production MGM Worldwide Television R~C/vav ./' ITEM 19 DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Council/City Manager Anthony Bmo, Chief Building Official ~j February 28, 1995 Building and Safety January 1995, Activity Report RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. DISCUSSION: The following is a summary of activity for January 1995: Building Permits Issued ............................................. 137 Building Valuation .......................................... 99,565,244 Revenue Collected ........................................... 9116,196. Housing Starts .................................................... 51 Building Inspections ............................................. 1,477 Commercial Additions/Alterations ............................ 8 - 1,687 Sq. ft. New Commercial Starts ................................. 3 - 173,827 Sq. ft. V:%TONY%REPORTSUAN'gS.RPT 2/6/96 tde APPROVAL TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning -~"' February 28, 1995 Monthly Report RECOMMENDATION: Receive end File Discussion: The following is a summary of the Planning Department's caseload and project activity for the month of January 1995: Caseload Activity: The Department received 4 applications for administrative cases and 2 applications for public hearing cases for the month of January follows: Specific Plan Land Use 1 Tentative Tract-Res Not R2/R4 I Ongoing Projects: Old Town Streetscaoe Improvement Project: The scope of the contract with EPT is being finalized. Council approval is expected in March. Old Town Redevelooment Project: Staff continues to meet with Zev Buffman and Gene Hancock on project financing. The public comment period closed on January 27, 1995. Staff is currently working with the consultant to prepare the responses to comments. Development Code: The Advisory Committee has completed its review of the Draft Code. A joint Planning Commission/City Council workshop to formally introduce a public hearing draft of the development code is being scheduled. A draft zoning map will also be presented at the workshop. The public hearing process before the Planning Commission is scheduled to start on March 20, 1995. A public hearing Draft Code will be available March 10, 1995. French Valley Airoort: The Riverside County Aviation Commission met on January 18, 1995, and recommended approval to the County Board of Supervisors for the Final Environmental Impact Report, Facility Master Plan for the French Valley Airport. The Airport Land Use Commission ha postponed consideration of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan until May 1995. It:~ONTI. ILy.RYf~I994AIAN 2/22/95 vlw 1 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 REVENUE STATUS REPORT 001 161 ACCOUNT # 4147 4148 4149 4150 4151 4152 4153 4154 4155 4156 4157 4169 4170 4180 4200 4206 4226 4260 4261 ~L 15:50:26 GENERAL FUND PLANNING DESCR]PT]ON VACATIONS PLAN CK DOCUMENT PROCESSING CONDEMNATION PLAN CHECK REVERSION TO ACRE. PLAN CHECK PARCEL NAP PLAN CHECK TRACT NAP PLAN CHECK ANENDED NAP PLAN CHECK 4TH & SUBS. SUBMITTALS FENA STUDY REVIEW LOIA REVIEW DRAINAGE STUDY REVIEW IMPROVE INSPECTION ON-SITE K-RAT STUDY FEES FAST TRACK PLANNING FORHA FAST TRACK IN HOUSE PLAN CHECKS ANNEXATION FEES TEMPORARY USE PERMIT ACCESSORY WIND ENERGY LARGE FANILY DAY CANE HAZARDOUS WASTE FACILITY LAND DIV UNIT NAP LANDSCAPE PLAN CHECK PLANNZNG CITY OF TEMECULA REVENUE STATUS REPORT JANUARY 1995 ADJUSTED ESTINATE .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 o00 .00 .00 170,000.00 JANUARY REVENUE .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 840°00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 7,985.00 28,266.19 1~4'~5 REVENUE .00 ,00 .00 .00 ,00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ,00 .00 .00 .00 .00 5,870.00 710.00 .00 .00 .00 ,00 187.00 29,425.00 147,056.09 PAGE BALANCE .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 5.870.00- 710.00- .00 ~ o00 .00 .00 187.00- 29,425.00- 22,943.91 COL TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager /J~Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer February 28, 1995 Public Works Monthly Activity Report RECOMMENDATION: Attached for City Council's review and filing is the Department of Public Works' Monthly Activity Reports for January, 1995. r:~agthpt~a~gupUajp Monthly Activity Report February 16, 1995 Page 2 6. Kent Hinterqardt Memorial Park: The contractor is addressing the final punch list items generated during the final walk through and the project is expected to be completed by the end of February, 1995. The project consists of the construction of a 950 square foot concession stand and rest room facility with a 225 square foot porch. 7. Traffic Signal & Vehicle Pre-Emotion Installation: The contractor will start work by February 21, 1995 and the pre-emption installation should be completed within two weeks. The project includes the installation of Traffic Signal Emergency Pre-Emption equipment at four (4) signalized intersections and Vehicle Emergency Pre-Emption equipment on nine (9) Fire Department vehicles. 8. Pala Road/Route 79S .Interim Imi~rovements: The contractor expects to start work on February 21, 1995 and complete the work within 3 weeks. The work to be performed includes, construction of asphalt pavement, traffic striping and signing, embankment construction, and traffic control to construct a right turn lane for traffic proceeding east on Route 79S to south on Pala Road. 9. Winchester Road Interim Ramp Improvements: The contractor has delivered the second "Construction Update" notice and is starting work on February 21, 1995. All lane closures will be at night-time hours so that traffic will be allowed through the site at all day time hours. The project will be completed within 3 months. The project will consist of widening both the south and north sides of Winchester Road between Jefferson Avenue and the I-15 south bound ramps. The existing traffic signals at Jefferson Avenue and the south bound ramps will be modified along with the landscaping and irrigation. 10. Traffic Signal at Margarita Rd. & Avenida Barca: The contractor will start work during the week of February 27, 1995 and expects to be completed by early April. This project is Federally funded and consists of the installation of a fully actuated traffic signal, signing and striping at the intersection of Margarita Rd. and Avenida Barca. r:~noectrpt%cip%gS~jen.95/ejp Month/y Activity Report February 16, 1995 Page 4 4. Sam Hicks Monument Park Imorovement PrQject: The final plan check comments have been returned to the architect and the plans and specifications are expected to be ready for the solicitation of bids by the middle of March, 1995. The improvements include the construction of a 950 square foot concession stand and rest room facility, an asphalt parking lot, landscaping and irrigation improvements, and assorted park site amenities. The construction activities are to be coordinated with the construction of the museum and church renovation projects. 5. Rencho Vista Road and Mira Loma Drive Sidewalk Imorovements: This project is funded from Senate Bill 821 funds for Fiscal Year 1994-95. The project consists of the installation of approximately 14,600 square feet of sidewalk on the northerly side of Rancho Vista Rd. between Mira Loma Dr. and Santa Suzanne Dr., the easterly side of Mira Loma Drive between Rancho Vista Rd. and Santa Cecilia Dr., and the southerly side of Rancho Vista Rd. east of Avenida de la Reina. This project is in the early stages of design and is expected to be out to bid by May, 1995. 6. Solana Way Storm Drain Imorovements: The City received seven RFP's on November 28, 1994 from local engineering firms for the construction of the Solana Way storm drain improvements (Ynez Road to Acacia Park Resort Apartments). The improvements to be constructed include, but not limited to grading, main line storm drain, utility relocations, misc. structures, erosion control, and traffic control. A meeting has been scheduled for Thursday, February 14, 1995 with the highest ranked firm to discuss the scope of work and negotiate the terms of a professional services contract. 7.1-151Rancho California Road Interchange Modifications: The project plans and specifications are approximately 95% complete and will be resubmitted to Caltrans after the consultant completes the plans for the northbound off-ramp using the option which includes a 2:1 slope design and the purchase of additional right-of-way. 8. I-1 51Overland Drive Overcrossing Improvements: The Project Report and Project Study Report have been reviewed and approved by Caltrans. The plans and specifications have been submitted to Caltrans for final review on Friday, January 13, 1995. The structural plans have been submitted to Caltrans (Division of Structures) on Friday, January 6, 1995 for review. The consultant is preparing the legal plats and descriptions of the properties that need to be acquired. r:~noactrpt%cip~95~an.gSi~p LAND DEVELOPMENT Monthly Activity Report Special Projects January, 1995 Cf..~c- Submitted by: Joseph Kicak Prepared by: Raymond A. Casey Date: February 10, 19.95 FFMAIOFS RFIMRURRFMFNT: Staff is continuing to coordinate with the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the State Office of Emergency Services (OES) representatives in seeking reimbursement for costs incurred by the City due to the January 1993 floods and ensuing disaster declaration. OES has reimbursed the City a total of ~952,832 to date. The Murrieta Creek Damage Survey Report was determined to be a valid claim bringing the total cumulative reimbursable amount to $1,080,996. Staff has also been coordinating with FEMA and OES in seeking reimbursement for costs incurred by the City due to the recent floods of January/February 1995. PARKVIFW SITF (PROJFCT NO. PW93-09): The Final Rough Grading Plan is being reviewed by City Staff along with the Pauba Road /' 'provement Plans and the Construction Specifications. Rough Grading construction is anticipated' begin in April 1995 and be completed in May 1995. ASSFSSMFNT nlSTRICT 159 (AD 159): The AD 159 improvements, as listed, are at the following stages of construction: Temecula Creek is approximately 95% complete. The Butterfield Stage Road, and DePortola Road improvements are complete and the roads are nearly ready for City acceptance. Highway 79 South plans will be submitted to Caltrans (third plan check) and RCFCD (second plan check) in February. Pala Road's Request For Proposal for environmental consulting has been approved by Caltrans. Phase I construction (from Butterfield Stage Road to Avenida de Missions) is scheduled to begin this summer. ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 161 (AD 1 61 ): Winchester Road (Area II) - estimated completion date is January 1996 The Notice to Proceed was issued for Murrieta Hot Springs Road (West) and the estimated completion date is mid June 1995. To date, we have met with Rancho California Water District and Eastern Municipal Water District and all draft, conceptual, and tentative development plans and information were forwarded. We ~'~ re also met with Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District's Planning dision and have determined the criteria regarding Murrieta Creek's improvements in order to proceed with the designs of the proposed First Street and Western Bypass Corridor Bridge Crossings. The 45 day review period of the Draft Environmental Impact Report ended on January 23, 1995 and we are awaiting comments from the State Clearing House MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Joseph Kicak, Interim Director of Public Works/City Engineer Brad Buron, Maintenance Superintendent February 1, 1995 Monthly Activity Report - January 1995 The following activities were performed by Public Works Department, Street Maintenance Division in-house personnel for the month of January 1995: II. III. IV. VI. SIGNS A. Total signs replaced B. Total signs installed C. Total signs repaired TREES A. Total trees trimmed for sight distance and street sweeping concerns POTHOLES A. Total square feet of potholes repaired CATCH BASINS A. Total catch basins cleaned RIGHT-OF-WAY WEED ABATEMENT A. Total square footage for right-of-way abatement GRAFFITI REMOVAL A. Total locations B. Total S.F. STENCILING A. 16 new and repainted legends B. 0 L.F. of red curb new and repainted C. 0 S.F. of sandblasting/grinding VII. 14 633 211 0 13 1,933 r:%roads~e~t~pt~gS%01 ekg MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT - January 1995 Page No. 3 STREET MAINTENANCE CONTRACTORS The following contractors have performed the following projects for the month of December. MONTELEONE EXCAVATING Account No. 5409 Date: January 11, 1995 Citywide Debris Miscellaneous Clean-Up Total Cost: $1,481.00 Account No. 5402 Date: January 10, 1995 Cabrilio/John Warner Street Clean-Up Total Cost: $402.00 Account No. 5402 Date: January 10, 1995 Emergency Work Street Clean-Up Miscellaneous Jobs Total Cost: $580.00 Account No. 5402 Date: January 18, 1995 Citywide Street Culvert Clean-up Total Cost: $1,092.00 r:%roads%a~trpt~g5~)1 ekg MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT - January 1995 Page No. 5 Account No. 5402 Date: January 5, 1995 Citywide Miscellaneous Street Debris Clean-Up Total Cost: ;4,958.50 Account No. 540~ Date: January 14, 1995 Utah Pacific moves for equipment to Via Lobo Channel Clean-Out Total: ;540.00 Account No. 5402 Santiago Road Removal of Silt from Desilting Ponds Total: ;496.00 Account No. 5402 Date: January 13, 1995 Sports Park Quantity (22.31) 1/4 Ton Rip-Rap Rock for Erosion Control Total: ;320.72 Account No. 540~ Date: January 11, 1995 Misc. Clean-Up (5) Motor Grader (5) Motor Grader for John Warner Road/Liefer Road/Walcott Lane Total: ;960.00 r:%roeds%actrpt%g5%01 ekg MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT - January 1995 Page No. 7 Account No. 5401 Date: January 10, 1995 Via Lobo Channel Clean-Out Total: $6,874.10 Account No. 5401 Date: January 10, 1995 Santiago Road Channel Clean-Out Total: $4,523.00 Account No. 5401 Date: January 10, 1995 Pala Road Channel Rip-Rap Total: $2,754.00 Account No. 5401 Date: January 10, 1995 Santiago Road Desilting Ponds Lay Plastic/Sandbags Total: $286.00 Account No. 5401 Date: January 9, 1995 Liefer Road Rip-Rap Placement for Erosion Control Total: $2,922.00 r:%roade%actrpt%gb'~01 ekg MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT- January 1995 Page No. 9 Account No. 5401 Date: January 10, 1995 Pala Road Channel Cleaning Tickets Missed on first billing Total: $1,838.50 Account No. 5401 Date: January 19, 1995 Via Lobo Channel Cleaning Total: $5,442.70 Account No 5401 Date: January 13, 1995 Santiago Road Channel Cleaning Total: $7,748.20 Account No. 5401 Date: January 13, 1995 Liefar Road Rip-Rap Concrete for Erosion Control Total: $1,731.53 Account No. 5401 Date: January 14, 1995 Pala Road Channel Rip-Rap and Concrete for Erosion Control Total: $5,580.64 r:~oads~fl~gb'~01 ekO MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT - January 1995 Page No. 11 Account No. 5401 Date: January 19, 1995 Vallejo between Santiago and Ynez Channel Repairs/Rip-Rap and Concrete Total: $3,210.00 Account No. 5401 Date: January 11, 1995 Moraga Road/Margarita Road Channel Restoration Rip-Rap Total: $6,530.50 Account No. 5401 Date: January 14, 1995 Moraga/Margarita Channel Restoration Total: $753.00 Account No. 5401 Date: January 12, 1995 Temecula Elementary MoragalMargarita Channel Restoration Total: $2,390.00 Account No. 5401 Date: January 19, 1995 Moraga Road Channel Restoration Total: $4,181.00 r:~,roKll~mQtrpt~S~t~)l MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT- January 1995 Page No. 13 ARBOR-PRO TRI:; Date: January 7, 1995 Emergency Tree Removal end Trimming due to wind and rain Total trees 12 Total Cost: ~900.00 r:~roede~aotrpt~gb'M)l ekg TRAFFIC DIVISION Monthly Activity Report For January, 1995 Submitted by: Joseph Kicak Prepared by: Marty Lauber Date: February 15, 1995 I. TRAFFIC REnUFSTS TRAFFIC REQUESTS: Nov. Dec. Jan. Received 3 6 4. Completed 6 6 ' 3 Under Investigation 6 5 9' Scheduled for Traffic Commission 0 3 2 II. DIVISION PROJECTS: A. The Safe Route to School Committee has begun their review of traffic operations at Rancho Elementary School. The first step in our process involves working with the school district to establish a suggested route to school exhibit to be distributed to all students. Sent Requests for Proposals (RFP) to Traffic Engineering Firms for the deign for traffic signal on State Route 79 (S) at Margarita Road/Redhawk Parkway. The proposals were submitted January 3, 1995, for Staff review and consultant selection. The recommendations should be presented to City Council at the February 14, 1995 City Council meeting. Ce The Public/Traffic Safety Commission has approved two prototype designs for possible Special street name signs. Staff's intention was to establish an alternate street name sign that would replace damaged wooden street name signs. The Commission recommended that the proposed signs become a Citywide standard, implemented through attrition. The Meadowview Community might maintain and operate street signs in their neighborhood upon approval by the City Council and execution of an appropriate agreement. De Requested two fiscal impact estimates for the naming of State Route 79 (South), from the California Department of Transportation. Naming SR 79(S) would involve modifying or replacing the large guild signs on Interstate 15 and all local street name signs. Issued a work order to re-stripe the intersection of Diaz Road and Winchester Road to provide for dual turns. Westbound left turns and Northbound right turns will be expanded to handle the high turn demand. This will be accomplished by converting two exclusive through lanes to dual purposed lanes for through and turn movements. TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ITEM 1 APPROVA CITY ATTORNE~ FINANCE OFFIC CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: Board of Directors FROM: Ronald E. Bradley, General Manager DATE: February 28, 1995 SUBJECT: Swim Team Agreement PREPARED BY: ~ RECOMMENDATION: Herman D. Parker, Recreation Superintendent That the Board of Directors: Approve the Agreement between the City of Temecula Community Services Department and the Temecula Tritons Swim Team, for use of the Community Recreation Center Swimming Pool. DISCUSSION: The Temecula Tritons Swim Team has requested continued use of the Temecula Community Recreation Center Swimming Pool for youth competitive swim programs and activities. The Tritons are a local non-profit organization, (swim team) committed to promoting aquatic activities and competitive swim programs for youth. The Tritons organized and coordinated an extremely successful youth swim team during the Summer and Fall of 1994, participating in seven (7) swim meets and registering over forty-six (46) team members. In an effort to support the Temecula Triton Swim Team and their programs continued success and growth, staff has prepared the attached Agreement, "Between the City of Temecula Community Services Department and the Temecula Tritons Swim Team". The proposed Agreement provides the Tritons use of the Temecula Community Recreation Center Swimming Pool from March I st through November 20th of each year. The proposed Agreement would become effective March 1, 1995 and terminate November 20, 1997, with a two (2) year renewal option. A minimal fee of ~10.00 for each hour of use by the Tritons would be assessed to help defray costs associated with the pools maintenance and operations. The proposed Agreement has been reviewed and approved by the Community Services Commission and our City Attorney. FISCAL IMPACT: The ~10.00 fee for each hour of pool use by the Tritons will help off-set pool operation and maintenance costs. The Tritons, at its own cost and with prior written appwval of the Direcwr of Community Services, may install, erect or place limited or minor improvements in the Swimming Pool area, including scoreboards or announcement boards. Such impwvements shall not be installed without prior written consent of the Director of Community Services. All such improvements which are attached w the building or deck shall become the property of the City upon termination of this Agreement. The Tritons shall be solely responsible for all purchases rehtive to its activities, and shall hold and save the City harmless therefrom. 10. The Tritons shall be solely responsible for pwviding security for the Swimming Pool area; which security shall include locking of the security gates at said pool when occupied by Triton Swim Team. The Triwns shall be responsible for moving the pool cover as necessary for usage,' and rephcing said cover upon the completion of said usage. 11. The City shall provide normal maintenance to the Swimming Pool, deck, locker rooms, adjacent axeas and water treatment. 12. 13. The City shall provide at its sole cost the necessary utilities for heating, operation and use of the Swimming Pool and adjacent areas. The Tritons hereby agrees to defend, indemnify, protect and hold the City, its officers and employees harmless from and against all claims, damage, loss, cost or expense, including reasonable atWrney's fees, arising out of or in any way resulting from the use and operation of the Swimming Pool during March 1st through November 20th by Tritons, excepting therefrom such times as the pool may be used by City for its programs and for the cost of any impwvements Tritons may make to the Swimming Pool pursuant to paragraph 7. 14. The Tritons shall secure and maintain during the term of this Agreement, public liability and property damage insurance as shall protect it from claims for damages for personal injury, including death, as well as for claims for property damage which may arise pursuant W operations under this Agreement. Such insurance shall include public liability insurance in mount not less than $1 million for injuries, including death, to any one person, and $2,000,000 on account of any one occun'ence, and property damage insurance in an mount not less than $500,000. Policies or certificates evidencing the above requLred coverage shall be filed with the City and shall include the City, its elected officials, officers, employees and agents as an additional insured. The policies shall not be cancelled or materially changed without thkrty (30) days prior written notice to the City. BE'rW~:~:N ~ C1TY OF ~ COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT AND ~ Tl~MECULA TRITONS SWIM TEAM This Agreement entered into on this day of , , by and between the Community Services Department of the City of Temecula, hereinafter referred to as "City" and the Temecula Triton Swim Team, hereinafter referred to as 'Tritons", muV~lly agree as follows: The City hereby grants permission to Tritons to use the Temecula Community Recreation Center Swimming Pool, hereinafter referred to as "Swimming Pool", located at 30875. Rancho Vista Road, Temecula,. California. The Tritons may use the Swimming Pool from March 1st through November 20 of each year, at the times. and under the terms hereinafter set forth. The term of this Agreement shall commence on March 1, 1995, and shall end on November 20, 1997, with a two (2) year renewal option, unless terminated sooner, for any reason, by either party upon thirty (30) days prior written notice to the other. The City shall at nil times have first priority for the use of the Swimming Pool for City sponsored programs, activities and services. The Tritons shall schedule their dates and hours for using the Swimming Pool with the City on a seasonal basis. All Triton events and activities at the pool must be approved by the City. The Tritons shall pay to the City monthly rent, in the 3mount of $10.00 for each hour of use. Rent shall be due and paid to the City on the last day of each month the Tritons use the Swimming Pool. The payment of rent shall be accompanied by a detailed listing of each date and hour of use by the Tritons, for each month. During said dates of March 1st through November 20 of each year, Tritons shall provide at its sole cost such personnel as may be necessary to maintain adequate supervision and ensure safety at the Swimming Pool, locker rooms and adjacent areas for all Triton events and activities. In addition, Tritons sh~ll provide the necessary lifeguards as required by state hw or local ordinance. Said personnel sb~ll be and are employees of Tritons and not the City. The Tritons shall be responsible for ensuring that the Swimming Pool, locker rooms and adjacent areas are clean, neat in appearance and free of litter or debris after their use on a daily basis. 15. The City reserves the right to increase the amounts of insurance coverage described hereinabove, and tO require additional riders or provisions in said policies or certificates as may be deemed necessary, consistent with the purposes of this Agreement. The Tritons shall be responsible for any damage or destruction to the subject premises resulting from Tritons use thereof or failure to properly maintain security and shall return the subject premises to City, upon termination of this Agreement, in a clean and safe condition. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF TEMECULA Jeffcry E. Stone Date Mayor TEMECULA TRITON SWIM TEAM President Date APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney Date June S. Greek Date City Clerk ' ITEM 2 APPROVAT~ CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFI CITY MANAGER TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AGENDA REPORT TO: General Manager/Board of Directors FROM: Genie Roberrs, Finance Officer DATE: February 28, 1995 SUBJECT: Review and Approval of the 1994-95 Mid-Year Budget PREPARED BY: Tim McDermott, Chief Accountant RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO 95- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGETS DISCUSSION: Each year a mid-year review is conducted of the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) operating budgets. The purpose of this review is to conduct an analysis of revenues and expenditures to ensure that the TCSD maintains a prudent and healthy fiscal position. The Finance Department staff has performed an analysis of revenues. Additionally, TCSD staff has reviewed the operating budgets and has submitted year-end expenditure projections. Activity in each of the funds is presented in accordance with the following schedules: Schedule A - Fund Summary: Illustrates activity in terms of the current budget, year- to-date activity as of December 31, 1994, and the recommended mid-year amended budget. Schedule A presents the beginning fund balance, revenues, expenditures and operating transfers, and the projected ending fund balance based upon this activity. Schedule B - Revenue Detail: Illustrates revenue detail by fund source in terms of the current projections, year-to-date activity as of December 31, 1994, and the mid-year revised projections, Schedule C - Expenditure Summary: Illustrates summaries of expenditures by each department within the fund in terms of the current budget, year-to-date activity as of December 31, 1994, and the mid-year revised projections. FISCAL IMPACT: The mid-year adjusted budget projections result in either minor increases or no change in the projected fund balances at June 30, 1995. There is no impact on current assessment rates. Attachments: Resolution Schedules A through C: - TCSD - Service Levels A through D - Debt Service Fund Exhibit I - Personnel Allocation By Department STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA) I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 28th day of February, 1995, by the following vote of the Board of Directors: BOARDMEMBERS: NOES: BOARDMEMBERS: ABSENT: BOARDMEMBERS: June S. Greek, Board Secretary SCHEDULE A Revenue Expenditures Excess of Revenues Over Expenditures Transfers from (to) Other Funds Increase (decrease) in Fund Balance Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 1994 Est. Fund Balance, June 30, 1995 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT SERVICE LEVEL A 191 FUND SUMMARY FY 94-95 FY 94-95 FY 94-95 AMENDED YTD @ YEAR-END BUDGET 12/31/94 PROJECTION 157,158 $ 1,383 $ 157,162 182,808 81,171 182,808 (25,650) (79.788) (25,646) 0 0 0 (25,650) $ (Ts,7ee) (25,646) 83,448 83,448 57,798 $ 57,802 21 -Feb-95 SCHEDULE A Revenue Expenditures Excess of Revenues Over Expenditures Transfers from (to) Other Funds Increase (decreeso) in Fund Balance Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 1994 Est. Fund Balance, June 30, 1995 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT SERVICE LEVEL C 193 FUND SUMMARY FY 94-95 AMENDED BUDGET 476,214 $ 571,21 5 (95,001) (15,397) (110,398) $ 335,535 225,137 FY 94-95 YTD@ 12/31/94 12,292 314,493 (302,201) (15,397) (317,598) FY 94-95 YEAR-END PROJECTION 476,214 571,215 (95,001) (15,397) (1'10,398) 335,535 225,137 21 -Feb-95 SCHEDULE A /~- Revenue Expenditures Excess of Revenues Over Expenditures Operating Transfers In Increase (decrease) in Fund Balance Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 1994 Est. Fund Balance, June 30, 1995 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT DEBT SERVICE FUND 390 FUND SUMMARY FY 94-95 AMENDED BUDGET 0 $ 499,600 (4 gg, GO0) 4gg,GO0 0 $ 510,4~0 510,430 FY 94-95 YTD{~ 12/31/94 7,699 330,596 C322,eg7) 318,863 (4,034) $ $ FY 94-95 YEAR-END PROJECTION 10,000 502,984 (492,984) : 11,446 510,430 521,876 21 -Feb-95 SCHEDULE B k NO TSCD FUND 191 SERVICE' LEVEL A I DEPT 180 NON-DEPARTMENTAL 4005 -Assessments 4006 4.ien Ratease 4065 4rivetmerit Inter~t 4390 -Sb'eet Lighting Fees FUND 192 SERVICE LEVEL B DEPT 180 NON-DEPARTMENTAL 4005 -Alle~mertts 4065 4nvestmertt Interet 4300 -Steer Lighting Fee ITOTAL FUND 192 FUND 198 SERVICE LEVEL C DEFT 180 NON-DEPARTMENTAL 4005 -Assessments 4064 -Recovery of Assessmere 4065 -Investment Interest 4120 -Public Use Permit ,,J423 -Specific Plan / g -Dedication Fees 0 -LlJldsMpe Plan Check 4371 -Landscape Inspection ITOTAL FUND 1'~ FUND 194 SERVICE LEVEL D DEFT 180 NON-DEPARTMENTAL 4005 -Assessments 4006 -Lien Release 4065 -Investment Interest TOTAL FUND 194 TOTAL ALL TCSD FUNDS TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT REVENUE DETAIL BY FUND SOURCE FY 94-85 BUDGET PROJECTION ~'J..~,jJv 0 1,800 0 FY 94-95 0 4 1,37~ 0 216,186 3,000 0 219,186 I 3 2,834 7,639 10,476 I 428.214 0 8,000 0 0 0 20.000 20,000 476,214 0 0 8,667 0 0 0 0 5,625 12,292 1,474,787 0 2,500 1,477,287 5,129,618 0 165 3,576 3,741 165,228 FY 94-65 PROJECTION 155~58 4 1,800 0 216,186 3,000 7,63~ 228,825 428,214 0 8,000 0 0 0 20,000 20,000 476,214 I 1,474,787 163 2,500 1,477,452 5,182,078 VARIANCE 4 0 0 " 7,638 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ;0 0' 0 163 0 163 52,460 21 -Feb.65 SCHEDULE C r,---1 190 TCSD CITY-WIDE FUND TCSD NON-DEPT.-DEPT 180 -Personnel Services -Operating Expenditures -Operating Expenditures -Capital Expenditures 'Subtotal OPERATING TRANSFER OUT Total Department SENIORS-DEPT 1 81 -Personnel Services -Operating Expenditures -Operating Expenditures -Capital Expenditures . Department CRC-DEPT 182 -Personnel Sen/ices -Operating Expenditures -Operating Expenditures -Capital Expenditures Total Department RECREATION-DEPT 183 -Personnel Services -Operating Expenditures -Operating Expenditures -Capital Expenditures Total Department TOTAL TCSD FUND 190 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT EXPENDITURE BUMMARY BY DEPARTMENT FY 94-95 FY 94-95 FY 94-95 ADJUSTED YTD @ MID-YEAR APPROPRIATION 12/31/94 AMENDED BUDGET 669,838 445,801 632,448 12,847 2,265,364 305,546 204,957 359,587 6,900 876,990 320,777 1,197,767 667,573 445,801 634,713 12,847 2,265,364 55,765 44,400 0 10,000 110,165 23,632 14,426 0 9,007 47,065 43,509 0 10,000 110,165 78,591 164,300 0 0 242,891 34,328 90,953 0 0 125,281 80,567 162,324 0 0 242,891 128,400 134,519 0 0 262,91 9 2,881,339 67,793 80,130 0 0 147,923 1,51 8,036 135,726 163,51 9 0 0 2,917,665 VARIANCE INCREASE (DECREASE) (2,265) 0 2,265 0 891 (891) 0 0 0 (1,976) 0 0 7,326 26,000 0 0 36,326 36,326 -0.3% 0.0% 0.4% 0.0% 1.6% -2.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2.5% -1.2% 0.0% 0.0% 5.7% 21 0.0% 0.0% 1.3% 21 -Feb-95 SCHEDULE C ~3 390 TCSD DEBT SERVICE NON DEPT-DEPT 199 -Personnel Services -Operating Expenditures -Operating Expenditures -CRpit~l Expenditures TOTAL DEBT SERVICE FUND TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT DEBT SERVICE EXPENDITURE SUMMARY FY 84-95 FY 94-95 ADJUSTED YTD @ APPROPRIATION 12/31/94 FY 84-95 MID-YEAR AMENDED BUDGET 0 499,600 0 0 499,600 0 330,595 0 0 0 502,984 0 0 VARIANCE INCREASE (DECREASE) 0 3,384 0 0 3,384 0.0% 0.7~.. 0.0% 0.0% 21 -Feb-95 ITEM 3 APPROV CITY A'I'rORNEY~V~~ FINANCE OFFICE CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: Board of Directors FROM: Ronald E. Bradley, General Manager DATE: February 28, 1995 SUBJECT: Parkview Site Project - Phase II PREPARED BY'-~/ Phyllis L. Ruse, Senior Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors approve Amendment No. I of $66,300 to the design contract with RJM Design Group, Inc. to include the design, construction documents, and construction administration for Phase II of the Parkview Site Project, described as the upper pond and channel improvements adjacent to the Sports Park Desiltstion Lake. BACKGROUND: On January 24° 1995, the Board of Directors approved the Master Ran for the Parkview Site and Phase I of litis project, which will include a new fire station and off-site street improvements to Paube Road. In this Master Plan, RJM Design Group, Inc. included improvements to the Rancho California Sports Park Desiltation Lake and the upstream channel bed in the overall design for the Parkview Site. The City has received studies and reports regarding the Rancho California Sports Park Desiltation Lake, which will .be beneficial in the design of improvements and future maintenance of the channel and ~)dm. The improvements to the Desiltation Lake are supported by the Union for a River Greenbelt Environment (URGE). URGE is the recipient of two grants from the Califomia Water Resources Department, each in the amount of $50,000 for the lake project. The City must, however, begin construction on the improvements by June 30, 1995 or the funds will be in jeopardy of being withdrawn. There is sufficient time to prepare construction drawings, obtain necessary permits, bid and award this project before the Juee 30 deadline. The upstream improvements would be the first component of the overall lake improvements and Phase II of the Parkview Site Project. The shallow pond will help remo~ae sediment from the water before it reaches the lake, will be easier and less costly to clean, aed by the water's constant movement, will help improve its quality. Improvements to the dtannel bed itself will also aid in silt removal from final disposition in the lake. A pump vii circulate water from the larger detention basin to the pond and the water will naturally flow beck to the basin. The pond and channel water course will provide an attractive water ameeity adjacent to future open play and picnic areas. AMENDMENT NO. 01 TO CONTRACT ORDER NO. 16397 Parkview Site Imprtwement Project Febvmty 28. 1995 The Agreement dated October 11. 1994 between the City of Temecula, and l~M Design Croup. Inc.. (herehalter referred to as "Agreement") is hereby mended as follows: Re: ADDITIONAL SERVICES ~qection 1 Scope of Work is hereby amended to include the additional services as described in the attached Exhibit 'A". : Compensation for these additional services is a not to exceed $66,300, as described in Exhibit "A ". B. llng and payment for these services shah be in conformante with the original contract between the parties. Section 2 All other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain the same. The paxties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date and year above written. CONSISTANT CITY OFTEMECULA By: RJM Design Group, Inc. Robert I. Mueting, President By: Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor ATTEST: Peter Thorson, City Attorney June S. Greek, City Clerk o21ee$ Exhibit "A" Page i of 1Z DESCRIFflON PHASEI 1.0 A. OF SERVICES RESOURCE DOCUMENTATION One kickoff meeting with City staff (Feb. 13, 1995) m review the project scope; refine time schedules; discuss upper pond and creek enhancement and improvement parameters. Obtain documentation available from the City pex~:aining to this project (including topographic and boundary survey, soils investigation and title repon). Acquire base map and resource information from City. In general, we anticipate the following resources will be necessary to be furnished by the 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. These items have been expressly excluded from our scope of services. Environmental studies and Environmental Impact Report. Existing hydrology studies. Existing siltation study. Pond imlwovement studies. Financing plan. Creek "As-Built" Plans. Aerial Topography/Contour Map/Project Boundaries/Existing Utilities Plans. Review State and local codes and standards applicable to site development. MEETINGS: PRODUCTS: (1) - Kickoff meeting with key players to obtain documentation and establish project schedule. Updated schedule Page 2 of I 2,0 DET~krt.ED SITE ANALYSIS Our next task will be to physically review, analyze, and document existing site assets and deficiencies. The ~gtysis of the site and surrounding relationhips shall also be reviewed in regard to the potential in~o. rtance of phasing for ~ and future construction. A. Conduct field review and analysis of existing site conditiom. Photo document site. Review and Research !~.xistln~ Drnin~i,e R~orts: Consultant shall provide research and investigation to compile existing literature and reports previously prepared regarding the tributary watershed and drainage systems impacting the Parkview site located in the City of Temecula. Research shall include review of previous engineering hydrology studies which specifically encompass or address the site. Excluded from this scope of services is a sedime~ transport study. Based on our review of the scope of work that J.F.Davidson is currently under: contract with the City of Temecula, it appears that a sediment trampon study is currently being prepared. Additional information to be reviewed includes historical flooding records and improvement plans. Work under this task will also include compiling flood control and drainage criteria for the project as specified by the City of Temecula and the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District. B. Produce site analysis/opportunities and constraints exhibit with existing utilities. C. Review existing hydrology study(s). D. Review existing Siltation Plan. E. Calculate storm water and siltation expected through creek system. F. Review Gootechnical Report as provided by the City. Review existing biological assessments and wetlands delineation. Conduct additional on- site surveys to update existing reports for submittal and processing of permit applications for Section 404 (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Nationwide Permit) and Section 1601 (California Depaxtment of Fish and Game Streambed Alteration Agr~ment). PRODUCTS: Opportunities and constraints/sit~ analysis/utilities availability map, base map at appropriate scale. rark-vimv SUe Upper Pond/Crick Sire Projset City of Temscula/559-04=3 Pa~3 Page 3 of I 3.0 A. SCItEMATIC DESIGN r)ebris b~in Conc~t: Provide professional engineering services relative to the development of a design concept for an expanded desilting facility upstream of Village Lake. Based upon the information gathered in Phase 1.0 and 2.0, a design concept debris/desilting facility will be developed using the research data for sedixnent yield and creek hydraulics. The design coneept for the debris/desilting facility will examine several alternatives including: · Enlarging the existing basin · Modifying the existing outlet works · Constructing additional desilting rarities The selected concept design will be reviewed with the City for approval prior to proceeding with the design development phase of the project. As indicated above, it is- assumed that hydtologic (hydtograph), hydrnlic and sediment yield/delivery information is available for the creek. Prepare Schematic Design and Plans relative to.the Upper Retention Pond and Creek adjacent the CRC including: 1. Intended Uses - for aesthetics, storm water conveyance and for promotion of water quality in Main Lake by interception/removal of debris and alesilting basin and by aerating effect of recirculated water on the stream. 2. Area section, configuration, water depths of strenm-~ and ponds. 3. Seepage control lining, stream edge treatment, bottom treatment, rocks and 4. Storm flow capacity, erosion and storm drainage, debris clean-up. 5. Recirculation pumping system, intake and discharge structures, aesthetic flows, etC. 6. Electrical, water supply, overflow drain, etc. 7. Water safety and mnintennnce. Provide an estimate of probable construction and m~intenence cost for the proposed pond and creek development. Prepare and submit permit applications for Section 404 CU.S. Army Corps of Engineers Nationwide Permit) and Section 1601 (California Depatiment of Fish and Game Streambed Alteration Agreement). Provide consultation during negotiations with Agencies. Pati~mv ~t, Upper Pond/Crmk ~ Projmt City of Tsnmmla/559-04=3 Page 4 of 11 Conduct meeting with the City staff, to review and discuss Schematic Proposals. Refute Schematic Plans based on staff input. IVIEETINGS: (1) - City staff meeting PRODUCTS: Schematic layout plans of the upper pond, creek and restoration/revegetation. associated 4.0 DESIGN DEVELO~ The fourth task of our services shall be to prepare all preliminary plans and cost analysis based upon the aspproved schematic design documents in order.to fix and describe the scope and character of the entire Project, including landscape architectural, environmental, civil, structural, - mechanical, electrical and water systems, materials and such other elements as may be appropriate. Comideration shall be given to availabfiity of materials, equipment and labor, construction sequencing and scheduling, economic analysis of construction, user safety and maintenance requirements, and energy conservation. Final selection of materials, textures, and colors shall occur. Prepare final designs and plans relative to site, environmental, structural, electrical, and mechanical engineering associated to the proposed project. B. Prepare probable estimates of construction and maintenance costs per square foot. C. Submit final design for staff review prior to construction drawings. PRODUCTS: Refined preliminary plans, refined cost analysis, refined mechanical and electrical systems, preliminary civil plans, material cut sheets and cost estimate. S.0 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMI~Vf PHASE The final Construction Document Phase of the project consists of the preparation of the construction documents to include final drawings, specifications, calculations, and final cost estimates. Our proposal includes water feature and engineering services required to execute the project and minimal erosion control landscape improvements. Specifically, we have included the following disciplines. A. Landscape Architectural/Site Development B. Wa~er Feature Development PaAvlmv me Unar remi/Creal Site Proira City of Temeoula559-04-3 Page 5 of 11 'C. Civil Engine'in4 Debris/Desilting Improvement piawt~ Consultant shall prepare debris/desilting improvement plans based on the design concept approved in Phase 3.0 in accordance with the appropriate governmental jurisdictional agencies grading ordinance. The plans shall include the design of fini.~hed grades for the basin and spillway devices. Ch,nnol Improvement Plans Based on the information gathered in previous phases, Consultant shall prepare an improvement plan within the existing channel to provide for a *low-flow" meandering lined channel approximately 3' wide for use as a recirculating water feature in conjunction with the development of the Parkview site. The channel is anticipated to be lippl'O:timnteJy 1,000' in length commeDCblg ~t the exist~Dg Lake Village desilting basin and extending eastward to the proposed desnting. basin. Any inczease to the length witl be considered a revision to this scope of work and will be covered under a separate agreement for an additional fee. D. Structural Engineering E. Mechanical Engineering F. Electrical Engineering Technical Specifications Prepare technical specifications conforming with the most recent applicable standards and specifications from: · City of Temecula "boilerplate" provided by the City for: -General Conditions -Special Provisions -Notice Inviting Bids, Contract Agreement, Bid Bonds, Instructions to Bidders, Proposal Requirements and Conditions. · City of Temecula Standard Plans and Specifications · Standard Speci~catiom for Public Works Construction ("Greenbook"), latest edition. · State of California Standard Specifications and Standard Plans, latest edition. During this phase, the Contna Doannents are prepared setting forth in detail the requirements for the cousuuction of the project. General conditions, instructions to bidders, and all special requirements are defined, and when combined with the various trade specifications, a complete project manual is produced. Parkvkw SiS UmMr l*md/Crml ~tm Prmjm City of Ten~mla/SSg-04-3 page 6 of 11 6.0 BIDDING PHASE mddi~ Procedur~ The Consultant shall assist the City with the Bidding Phase of the project. Questions, clarificatiom, or conflicts arising out of the bidding process will be resolved by addenda prepared by the Consultant (maximum (2) two addenda). Addenda to the contract for construction shall be prepared in writing to document any clarification or modification made to the contract documents. 7.0 CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION PHASE The Consultant Design Team shall conduct eight weekly job site meetings to generally review and evaluate the construction schedule, monitor performance, review quality control standards, and - provide assistance for any clarification or revision to the contract for construction. Shop drawings and related submittals shall be reviewed and returned to the consultant for appropriate action. The Contractor' s requests for information, proposal requests, and related commxlnications shall be attended to on a regular basis. Contractor's pay requests shall be reviewed by the Consultant on a monthly basis in accordance with the ~mount of work completed and in accordance with the contract documents. At every job site meeting, minutes shall be prepared, published and distributed by the Consultant to all parties concerned, specifically noting current action items and related responsib~ities. Upon completion of the Construction Phase the Consultant shall organize and conduct a final walk-through and review. A final punch list for all required corrections and remaining work shall be prepared. During the Construction Phase of the project, the following services shall be furnished: Precomtruetion Conference A preconstruction conference shall be organized and conducted to brief all parties concerned with general and special requirements of the contract for construction. Procedural matters, muting of information, and project representatives shall be defined. Attendees shall include representatives from the City's staff, the Consultant, the Contractor, and all major subcontractors. Job Site Meetings Job site meetings (total of 8) shall be scheduled and conducted by the Comultant for the same day and time through the duration of the project. Scheduling, coordination, requests for information, and changes to the contract for comtruction are routindy monitored. The Comultant shall publish and distribute a field report for each job site meeting, documenting the progress of construction and specifically noting current and delinquent action items. City of Temecg~559.04-3 Pele7 Page 7 of 12 Submittal and Shop Drawing Review The Consultant shall review all required shop drawings and related submittals as required by the contract documents. Project CloseOut At the completion of the Construction Phase a final job site meeting and review of the entire facility shall be conducted. A final punch list will be published and distributed by the Consultant to all parties concerned, specifically noting required corrections, non-conforming work, and work remaining to be completed. city of Tsmmda/559-04-3 Page 8 of 1] SECTION spprosch m the development of the PARK'v'IBW LTPF, R POND AND CREEK IMPIO~ PROJECT. Fees for Phsse Ind Phsse 1I sre ss follows: PHASB II: DesiSn and Construction rm~.mven,- fbr dam Upper Pond and Creek T,u,rw, Ovehxe~S 1.0 R,m.Ko DocF,u.~0cm 2.0 Dmikd Sits Andyah 3.0 Schedule- Design 4.0 !:ksiSnDsv~u,,~ 5.0 CoasmscdoaDoc,wmf, 6.0 Biddies 7.0 Coastnsctloa~a $1o,.~o. $ MOO. S30,'700. hourly u requested OramJ Fee Total $66,300. 8.2 8.3 /bdmbsmamt Allm olu order to save com~lewt mark,up on reproplphlc, printins, pimto2raphic, and ddlvefy .axis" -we. it b our suipSim thli s Tomerods acemat be established at · local blueprint company fur ths PARK~qKW UPPER POND AND CRwmu( IMPROVEMENT PROJECT. Titis will ave the city approxinmtdy 10-20~, city disc~mt and m:msultmt ADDITIONAL SERVICES Services which are not speclfka!ly ideadried be~ein a~ services to be performed by 1UM Dett~ 0fmap or i~ consultants are considered "Additional Services* for purposes of thia Agreeremit. Trio City ms,/request that R.TM Desip Croup pro'form setvies which ate Additlosul Services..However, RJM Desip hp b not obligat~J to pafOrm such Additiond Services till]eft gl smefidm~w tO t~ AJTGelliefit h,M beefl fully executed settiq forth the scope, schedole mid fee Eor auch AddltkmaJ Services. In the ovent RJM DeSjSn Group performs Addj~ona] ~efvicM before receipt of fach execumd ,~,e,4m~t the (~y Icknowledge~ iU oblipdon ~o ~y for such eervjces ~t RIM Design Group's stndml rKes, within 30 days of receipt of PjM Dmifn Ths bliowinf items shall not be a part of the be identified in the payment section above, shsll be reimbursable to K1M DesiF: Group. A. Additional meetings sad de visits as authorized by the City of Temecula. B. Prqmrsdon of eddhional Topofrsphic and Boundary in.formation. Pale~ Page 9 of 11 6.4 Environmental Impact Report or CEQA documentation, if required, shall be provided under separate contract. Soils engineering and geoteclmical report, aerial topography, potholing utilities, construction staking, drainage facilities plan preparation (street inlets, catch basim), shoring plan preparation or review, utility relocation plans, legal descriptions and exhibits, and application fees, specific plan modification or amendment. RJM Design Group shall provide the necessary plan check revisions requested by the city for two plan check reviews. All subsequent changes shall be done in accordance with the attached Standard Hourly Fee Schedule. CITY KESPONSIBILITIES A. City shall provide access to the site. City shall provide an up-to-date ti~e report. City is to provide any and all indemnification, abatement, disposal or other actions required by local, state or federal law regarding hazardous materials. D. City shall pay all governmental fees and costs. City shall require any construction contractors to indemnify Consultant from any and all losses, damages, clnlm~, expellses, including attorney fees, and costs arising out of the contractor's work, excepting only losses, damages, clsint% expenses including atwmey's fees and costs which are caused by the sole negligence or willful mi-~conduct of RIM Design Group and/or subconsultants in performing its services under this agreement. City will require that the construction contractors add RIM Design Group and subconsultants (Consultant) as an additional insured in the comprehensive general liability, auw liability, workers' compensation and builder risk insurance coverages required by the City. hrbiew Sire Upper PoaVCml Sits Civy of Temsouh559-04-3 Page 10 of 1~ 6.5 STANDARD HOURLY FEE SCHEDULE The Client agrees to pay Consultaut as compensation for all ~nthorized work included in the Scope of Services heretofore stated, at the hourly rates below. PRINCIPAL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT LANDSCAPE ARCBITECT DESIGNER SENIOR DRAFFSPERSON JUNIOR DRAFTSPERSON FIELD OBSERVATION WORD PROCESSOR $100.00 Per hour $88.00 per hour $82.00 per hour $55.00 per hour $48.00 per hour $88'.00 per hour $35.00 per hour Billings for all time and materials and contract extension work shall b~ in accordance with the level of work performed and will be broken into the categories listed above. FF.F. I~SCAI .ATION: Fees will be escalated each August 1st in accordance with any increase in the Consumer's Price Index or other mutually agreed upon cost index. Beglnnin~ with August 1, 1995. All provisions for escalations stated, pertain to all contract extension and additional work. Perk~w Site UFFm' PemVCree~ Site Projet City of Temm~SS9-04-3 Page 11 Page 11 ox io PRELIMINARY SCHEDULE (Upper Pond and Creek Improvements) MONTHS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 g 9 10 11 PHASE 1 TASK 1.0 Re~our~Coorm,~inn TASK 2.0 Dmiled Si~Analy~ TASK 3.0 S~ ~n En~n~ ~sing T ASK 4.0 ~ ~vel~t TASK 5.0 Co~cfl~ Ci~ Review ~d ~pmv~ TASK 6.0 Bid~g TASK 7.0 Cons~cfl~ ~DA~/~GS~ 1 4 IllIll I 2 34 567 8 IL- Review base information, existing site conditions, utilities, easements, project schedule. Review schematic design with Oty. Submit final design plans and materials prior to development of construction doeinherits. Submit 75% conslrdction drawings. 6 7 8 Submit 100% conslxuction drawings for formal plan check. Obtain State and Federal permit Commence bidding procedures. Commence construction. ITEM 4 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY~~ FINANCE OFFICE CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: Board of Directors FROM: Ronald E. Bradley, General Manager DATE: February 28, 1995 SUBJECT: PREPARED BY: ~ RECOMMENDATION: Santa Gertrudis Creek Trail - Final Agreement With Riverside County Rood Control. Beryl Yasinosky, Management Assistant That the Board of Directors: Approve the Agreement between the City of Temecula and Riverside County- Flood Control to utilize the Santa Gertrudis Channel Improvements for Recreational Trail purposes. Appropriate $25,000 in Public Facilities - Development Impact .Fees for the necessary trail improvements. BACKGROUND: Assessment District 161 recently completed channel improvements within the Santa Gertrudis Creek and is currently in the process of transferring the responsibility of this channel to Riverside County Flood Control. As part of the improvements, the District constructed asphalt paved access roads along the upper embankment of the channel. During the approximate two years of construction activity, the roadways remained open for heavy equipment. In addition, the access roads have also become a favorite route of travel for pedestrians, joggers and bicyclists living in the area. While much enthusiasm exists from the community to keep this area open for trail purposes, Flood Control has made it clear that they intend to close the channel to the public unless an agreement can be reached with the City to leave this area open for non-motorized trail use. Over the last several months, staff has met with representatives of Riverside County Rood Control, Supervisor Bob Buster's Office, Riverside County Parks Commission and citizens of the community concerning this matter. Staff has also received direction from the City's Risk Management Representative. Pursuant to these discussions, a receive and file report was presented to the Community Services Commission on January 9, 1995, which identified the a proposed agreement between the City of Temecula and Riverside County Flood Control to utilize the Santa Gertrudis Channel Improvements for recreational trail purposes. Subsequently, the City Attorney, Riverside County Flood Control and County Counsel have concurred on the final format of the Trail Agreement. On February, 13, 1995, the Community Services Commission approved the Trail Agreement, a copy of which is attached for your review. r:~ymbtd/~dtgrl.otd 02~95 Pursuant to the Trail Agreement, the City will be responsible for maintaining and developing the Santa Gertrudis Creek for non-motorizad recreational trail uses that are compatible with the purpose of the flood control channel improvements. Although the County of Riverside has determined that the riparian corridor is not compatible with the proposed trail, the Agreement will insure that these uses are on opposite sides of the channel. Therefore, the use of the facility will be concentrated to the south side of the channel improvements, which currently extend approximately two (2) miles westerly from Joseph Road to Ynez Road· While this portion of the Santa Gertrudis Creek provides an integral portion of the City's future trail system, staff is also concerned about mitigating certain safety and liability issues that will be incurred by the City upon acceptance of this area. While it has been determined that most of the safety issues will be addressed by adding signage, striping, directional arrows and fencing in some areas, of utmost concern is that the proposed trail route crosses Winchester Road (Highway 79 North). On January 12, 1995, staff met with Riverside County Transportation to discuss the viability of routing pedestrians and bicyclists under Winchester Road· Although it has been determined that an underpass could be constructed in concurrence with the widening of the new bridge, these improvements may be two years away. Until such time, staff has determined that trail users will be directed along an asphalt path to cross Winchester Road at the traffic signal located at Nicolas Road. Upon final approval of the Agreement by the Board of Directors, the document will be forwarded to the Riverside County Board of Supervisors for approval· Once the Agreement has been approved by Riverside County, the City will be able to begin enhancing the Channel' for trail use. It is anticipated that the Channel may be opened by the City as a recreational trail in April or May, 1995. FISCAL IMPACT: There would be no costs associated with entering into a license agreement with Riverside County Flood Control for the use of the channel. Maintenance costs are assumed to be limited to street sweeping at least once per week and patching of the asphalt paving, as necessary. Costs associated with the maintenance of this area will be provided through the TCSD Rates and Charges for City-wide Parks and Services. However, there would be costs associated with improving the channel for trail use. Costs for the striping of the southerly portion of the access road are estimated at 07,500 and will include a 4" solid white thermoplastic edgeline and a 4" yellow skip centerline· An additional 05,000 will be necessary to provide adequate signage and stenciling of the trail route. For safety reasons, approximately 02,500 would be necessary to provide barricades in certain areas along the channel embankment, and to prevent motorized recreational vehicles from accessing the trail. The asphalt path along both sides of Winchester Road, linking the trail to the Nicolas Road traffic signal, is estimated at 010,000. Costs related to the proposed undercrossing at the future Winchester Road Bridge are unknown at this time. Upon acceptance of this area by the City, and completion of the trail improvements, this trail will be indemnified by the Insurance Company of the West. ATTACHMENTS: Santa Gertrudis Creek Channel Agreement. Site/Location Map. Community Services Commission Report dated 2/13/95. o2395 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 AGREEMENT REGARDING USE OF THE SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK CHANNEL FOR RECREATIONAL PURPOSES The RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT, hereinafter referred to as "DISTRICT", and the CITY OF TEMECULA, hereinafter referred to as "CITY", hereby agree as follows: RECITALS DISTRICT owns and operates the SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK CHANNEL, including the access roads adjoining the CHANNEL, hereinafter referred to as CHANNEL located in the City of Temecula. CHANNEL is an essential and integral part of DISTRICT'S collection and disposal system of flood and surface waters within the area. This use is sporadic in nature, thereby.. allowing compatible uses by CITY for recreation purposes. In order to provide for public use of CHANNEL, CITY is agreeable to provide maintenance made necessary by CITY'S recreational use of CHANNEL and to develop the property for recreational use which is compatible with the primary purpose of CHANNEL. The County of Riverside, acting on behalf of Assessment District 161, has constructed or will construct a riparian mitigation corridor in the bottom of CHANNEL as mitigation for vegetation removed during CHANNEL construction. The County of Riverside has the obligation to install, maintain and monitor said corridor for a period of five years after 1 2 3 4 5 6 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 installation or until such time as the regulatory agencies tha~~., required the corridor relieve the County of such responsibility. The riparian corridor and recreational uses proposed under the agreement are not compatible, overlapping uses and are intended to occur on opposites sides of the channel bottom. AGREEMENT IT IS AGREED by the parties as follows: 1. DISTRICT agrees: A. TO grant to CITY a license to use said CHANNEL for recreational purposes which are not incompatible with DISTRICT'S primary flood control purpose and which do not interfere with or impair the DISTRICT'S ability to ~ operate and maintain CHANNEL or any of its appurtenant works. Said license shall remain in effect indefinitely so long as CITY'S use of CHANNEL right of way is so limited. B. To give written notice to CITY of any use being made of CHANNEL right of way by CITY not in conformity with this agreement or which could adversely affect flo6d control functions of CHANNEL, and grant to CITY thirty (30) days from and after such notice to correct any such nonconforming use. To perform maintenance resulting from DISTRICT'S operation of CHANNEL. -2- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 24 25 26 27 28 CITY agrees: A. That prior to any modification of CHANNEL to submit to DISTRICT plans for any work and/or improvements to CHANNEL for review and approval and to pay DISTRICT the cost of reviewing said plans. B. To assume the obligation to provide any maintenance associated with CITY'S use of CHANNEL and all liability in conjunction with the recreational use including claims of third persons for injury or death or damage to property. Said obligation shall not include any inverse condemnation liability of DISTRICT by reason of the location of CHANNEL or DISTRICT'S improvements thereto unless such liability is the result of CITY'S operations or use of the property by the public pursuant to CITY'S actual or tacit consent. C. In exercising its right to use CHANNEL for recreational purposes not incompatible with the primary purpose of CHANNEL, CITY may install such improvements and/or e~uipment therein as it deems appropriate for the said recreational purposes. D. If CITY should inst'all any improvements and/or equipment or if CITY uses or allows use of -3- 1 4 CHANNEL which, in the opinion of the General Manager-Chief Engineer, would be detrimental to the operation of CHANNEL, it will, upon written request of the General Manager-Chief 5 Engineer, remove said improvements and/or 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 equipment or cease said use. In conjunction with said improvements and/or equipment, CITY waives any right it may from time to time have against DISTRICT for damage to such improvements and personalty from time to time situated in CHANNEL that results from the operation and use of CHANNEL by DISTRICT. In its use of CHANNEL under the rights hereir granted, CITY agrees to promptly repair any damage occurring to DISTRICT'S improvements within CHANNEL, unless such damage is' caused by DISTRICT'S operation, maintenance or 19 improvements to its facilities within CHANNEL 20 property. 21 IT IS MUTUALLY agreed that: 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Each party hereto shall indemnify, defend, save and hold harmless the other party of and from any and all liability, claims, demands, debts, losses or suits for damages to other parties for personal injury or property damage, arising out of or in any manner connected with the performance of the duties and ~i obligations of such indemnifying party hereunder. -4- 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Any and all notices sent or required to be sent to the parties to this agreement will be mailed to the following addresses: RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT 1995 Market Street Riverside, CA 92501 CITY OF TEMECULA CITY CLERK 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92591 // // -5- 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IN WITNESS WEEOF, the parties hereto have executed this agreement on · (to be filled in by Clerk of the Board) RECOMENDED FOR APPROVAL: KENNETH L. EDW/tRDS General Manager-Chief Engineer RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT By: CHAI~, BOARD OF SUPERVISORS APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST: WILLIAM C. KATZENSTEIN County Counsel By: ~ Deputy Dated: J ~ ~ o ~q ~" GERALD A. MALONEY Clerk of the Board By: Deputy (SEAL) APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY OF TEMECULA By: RON ROBERTS, Mayor ATTEST: PETER THORSON City Attorney BY:Dp~u/ty~ ~' Dated: DFG:bjp rcfc\257 30Jan95 JUNE GREEK City Clerk By: Deputy (SEAL) -6- I I' ..h,/· · ml ' · TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT Community Services Commission Shawn D. Nelson, Director of Community Services February 13, 1995 Santa Gertrudis Creek Trail - Final Agreement With County Flood Control. Riverside PREPARED BY: RECOMMENDATION: t~,Beryl Yasinosky, Management Assistant That the Community Services Commission: Receive and file this report regarding the final agreement between the City of Temecula and Riverside County Flood Control to utilize the Santa Gertrudis Channel Improvements for Recreational Trail purposes. BACKGROUND: Subsequent to the Community Services Commission Meeting on January 9, 1995, staff is pleased to report that the City Attorney, Riverside County Counsel, and Flood Control have concurred upon the final format of a trail agreement which will provide for the recreational trail use of Assessment District 1 61 Channel Improvements within Santa Gertrudis Creek. A copy of this Agreement has been attached for your review. Pursuant to the Agreement, the City will be responsible for maintaining and developing the Santa Gertrudis Creek for non-motorized recreational trail uses that are compatible with the purpose of the flood control channel improvements. Although the County of Riverside has determined that the riparian corridor is not compatible with the proposed trail, the Agreement will insure that these uses are on opposite sides of the channel. Therefore, the recreational use of this facility will be concentrated on the south side of the channel improvements, which currently extend approximately two miles westerly from Joseph Road to Ynez Road. While this portion of the Santa Gertrudis Creek provides an integral portion of the City's future trail system, staff is also concerned about mitigating certain safety and liability issues that will be incurred by the City upon acceptance of this area. While most liability issues will be addressed by adding signage, striping, directional arrows and fencing in some areas, the utmost concern is that the proposed trail route crosses Winchester Road (Highway 79 North). Therefore, on January 12, 1995, staff met with Riverside County Transportation to discuss the viability of routing pedestrians and bicyclists under Winchester Road. Although it has been determined that an underpass could be constructed in concurrence with the widening of the new bridge, these improvements may be two years away. Until such time, staff has determined that trail users will be directed to cross Winchester Road at the traffic signal located at Nicolas Road. The Agreement will be forwarded to the TCSD Board of Directors for approval on February 28, 1995. Staff will forward the signed Agreement to the Riverside County Board of Supervisors for final approval. Upon notification of approval of the Agreement by Riverside County, the City will be able to begin enhancing the Channel for trail use. It is anticipated that the channel c~vesboblc~'knletr.a¢ Q~1395 will opened by the City as a recreational trail no later than April 19, 1995. FISCAL IMPACT: There would be no costs associated with entering into a license agreement with Riverside County Flood Control for use of the channel. Maintenancecosts are assumed to be limited to street sweeping at least once per week and patching of the asphalt paving as necessary. However, there would be costs associated with improving the channel for trail use. Costs for striping the asphalt access road are estimated at approximately ~7,500 and will include a 4" solid white thermoplastic edgeline and a 4" yellow skip centerline. An additional $5,000 will be necessary to provide adequate signage and stenciling of the trail. For safety reasons, approximately $2,500 would be necessary to provide barricades in certain areas along the channel embankment, and to prevent motorized recreational vehicles from accessing the trail. Costs related to the proposed undercrossing at the future Winchester Road Bridge are unknown at this time. Upon completion of the trail improvements, this trail will be indemnified by the Insurance Company of the West. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Santa Gertrudis Creek Channel Agreement. 2. Community Services Commission Report dated 1/9/95. r:.\v~inobk'~Inlu. r.c~ 0~1395 DEPARTMENTAL REPORT CITY A TTORAN~'ROV~ FINANCE OFFICE~ CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: Board of Directors FROM: Ronald E. Bradley, General Manager DATE: February 28, 1995 SUBJECT: Departmental Report PREPARED BY: ~ Shawn D. Nelson, Director of Community Services DISCUSSION: The City Council awarded a design services contract to the Alhambra Group for the Master Plan of the Margarita Road Park Site. Development of this 20 acre site will provide additional active/passive park land to the City's park system. Staff will begin the master plan process and form a Project Committee to facilitate this process. : The joint-use agreement and the design services contract for the Temecula Middle Schod Lighting Project was approved by the Board of Directors at the December 20, 1994 meeting. Staff is now working with the design consultant to prepare plans and specifications to facilitate a public bid process. It is anticipated that this project will be out to bid in the next 90 to 120 days. Loma Linda Park Project - Phase II has completed the 90 day maintenance period and is now open to the public. This second phase increased Loma Linda Park by approximately one acre and includes a tot lot, open play areas, picnic facilities, landscaping and irrigation. The contractor has nearly completed construction on the Restroom/Snack Bar facility at Kent Hintergardt Memorial Park. It is estimated that this project will be completed in March, 1995. Staff met with representatives from the Temecula Valley Museum and the design consultants to discuss construction phasing of the various elements. The museum is hoping to begin their renovation of St. Cstherine's Church in March, 1995. Construction is estimated to take 90 days. The City will solicit bids for the park improvements and begin construction when the church renovations are nearly completed. The museum will also be moving forward with plot plan approval and anticipates beginning construction for the new museum facility after completion of the church renovation. Staff will request that the Board of Directors award a design contract to RJM Design Group to prepare construction documents and project administration for Phase II of the Parkview Site Project, which will provide a smaller retention pond and channel improvements adjacent to the existing desiltstion lake at the Sports Park. This project will allow staff the ability to better maintain the silt that is collected in the smaller pond, while improving the quality of the water. With the completion of the Youth Soccer and Pop Warner Football seasons, staff has begun the process of renovating various park facilities. The renovation time frames will be completed in conjunction with the annual master calendar for the City's park system approved by the Sports Council. Also, Little League has begun practicing throughout the various parks and schools in the City. ITEM 1 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY · "APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA REPORT Executive Director/Redevelopment Agency Members Mary Jane McLarney, Assistant City Manager February 28, 1995 Consideration of RDA Commercial Rehabilitation Small Business Loan RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council consider approval of an RDA commercial rehabilitation loan to The Blind Pig Brewing Co., Inc., located at 42387 Avenida Alvarado, Suite 108, Temecula, CA 92590. DISCUSSION: The City has received an application from The Blind Pig Brewing Co., Inc. to expand their existing brewing business by way of a bottling line, and brew pub. The business is owned by Vincent Cilurzo and David Stovall, and the property is currently being leased for a term exceeding the proposed loan. The loan amount requested is $100,000. The purpose of this loan is to allow expansion of the existing capacity of the brewery, purchase a bottling line and all the necessary appurtenant components, and to create a brew pub/tasting room which is easily accessible to the public. This will allow the business regional expansion, and increased sales by almost 400%. The total cost requirement for the expansion is estimated at $150,000, in which the additional $50,000 is being raised via personal and outside investments. To date, approximately $16,000 in personal investment has been made on this expansion, and another $25,000 has been raised. The remaining $9,000 will also be made as a personal investment should the loan be approved. The terms of the loan are as follows: 9100,000 amortized over a 10 year period with payments of 91,377.50. The loan is secured by all existing equipment, and all new equipment purchased for the expansion. The loan will be in a first lien position with a $160,000 second being carried by a private party. The business contends that since the time of application, the brewery has received 27 new customers, and has contracts to install keg taps in four additional restaurants upon their completion. This loan package has been reviewed by the City's independent bank representative. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: The loan approval would be subject to receipt of the secondary note showing a five year term, and no prepayment option, a detailed list of the existing equipment (including but not limited to serial numbers, description, and estimated worth),and an updated UCC3 search showing no recent liens. FISCAL IMPACT: To date the City has funded 9109,400 in Redevelopment loans with an addition~il $100,000 approved but not funded.