Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout032895 CC Agendato · meet§nO will enable the City to make reasonable I ¥i~6e. rents to ensure access/lilly to that meeting [28 CFR 36.102.36.104ADA Td~e II] AP--FNnA TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL A REGULAR MEETING COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER 30875 RANCHO VISTA ROAD MARCH 28, 1995- 6:30 PM 5:00 PM * Closed Seedon of the CIty Councg pursuant to Govenvnent'~(~de Secdons:..~ ...... 1. i s49ss.e, CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGO+IATbR, PropertY:~ A iI.esI9~ is.: Parcd Number 922-023-020,8 City owned die located on Rrst and From Street; Negotiating" pardes: City of Temecula and Edward and KathJeen Doole: Under negotiation: pdca and terms of payment. · ,/ 2. § 54956.8, CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR, Proparty: R~nchO"'West'" Apartments, 42200 Main Street, Negotiating Pardes: Tamecuts Redevelopment Agency and Resolution Trust Corporation (RTC); Under negotiation: pdce and terms of payment. . . " 3. 954956.9(b), Claim of City against Rancho Core Assodates !. At approximately 9:45 PM, the City Council will determine which of the remaining agenda items can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00 PM and may continue all other items on which additional time is required until a future meeting. All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 PM. CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Jeffrey Stone presiding Next in Order: Ordinance: No. 95-07 Resolution: No. 95-.~5 invocation: Reverend Marty Edwards, The Lamb's Fellowship Flag Salute: Mayor Pro 'Tem Lindemans ROLL CALL: I.indemans, Mufioz, Parks, Robarts, Stone PRESENTATIONS/ PROCLAMATIONS Presentation of California Parks and Recreation Society Facility Design Award of Excellence California Architecture Week 1995 - Proclamation Homebuyer Education Month - Proclamation PUBUC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Council on items that are not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council on an item not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink 'Request to Speak' form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items s "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk before the Council gets to that item. There is · five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made at this time. A total, not to exceed, ten (10) minutes will be devoted to these reports. CONSENT CALENDAR 2 Standard Ordinance Adoption Procedure RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the minutes of February 14, 1995. 3 4 5 Resolution Aonrovinn Iist of hemands RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 95- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A Public Nuisance Abatement- 30301 Nicolas Road RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Set a public hearing for April 25, 1995 at 7:00 PM. at 30875 Rancho Vista Road, for the purpose of confirming the cost to the City for the abatement of · public nuisance at 30301 Nicolas Road. Professional Services Contract Renewal for Video Production Services RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Approve the professional services contract with Davlin for audio/video production services. 6 Records Destruction Reauest RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Approve scheduled destruction of certain records as provided under the City of Temecula approved Records Retention Policy. Resolution Declarina Results of March 7.1995 Flection RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 95- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, RECITING THE FACT OF THE SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ADVISORY ELECTION HELD ON MARCH 7, 1995, DECLARING THE RESULT AND SUCH OTHER MATTERS AS PROVIDED BY LAW 8 Contract Change Order No. I for 94-95 Slurrv Reel Project. Pro'mct No. PW94-1 ~ RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 Approve Contract Change Order No. I for materials, labor and equipment for various items of work in the amount of 810,721.30. 9 10 11 12 Contract Chanae Order No. I for FY94-95 Citywide P.C.C, Repair Prooram. Project No. PW94-13 RECOMMENDATION: 9.1 Approve Contract Change Order No. I for materials, labor and equipment for various items of work in the amount of 88,067.53. "No Parking" 7one on Marnarita Road from Rancho Vista Road to Pauba Road from 6:00 AM to 4:00 PM Weekdays RECOMMENDATION: 10. 1 Adopt a r~solution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 95- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING 'NO PARKING' ZONE ON MARGARITA ROAD FROM RANCHO VISTA ROAD TO PAUBA ROAD FROM 6:00 A.M. TO 4:00 P.M. WEEKDAYS Parcel MaD No. 28084- Hold Harmless Apreement RECOMMENDATION: 11.1 Approve the Hold Harmless Agreement with BA Properties, Inc. 11.2 Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the agreement. Plannino Aoolication No. PA94-01 ~0 end PA94-0121 RECOMMENDATION: 12.1 Approve the Partial Termination of Development Agreement No. 90-1 and authorize the Mayor to execute the Agreement. 13 14 15 Acceotmnce of I~.blic Rtreett into the City Maintained-Street System {v~r~t~in Trmct No. ~1760} RECOMMENDATION: 13.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 95-. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBUC STREETS INTO THE CITY MAINTAINED-STREET SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACT NO. 21760) Acceotance of Public Street into the City Maintained Street System (Butterfield Staae Road from Rancho Califomia Road to De Portola Road) RECOMMENDATION: 14.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 95- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREET CONSTRUCTED UNDER ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 159 INTO THE CITY MAINTAINED-STREET SYSTEM (BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD FROM RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD TO DE PORTOLA ROAD) Acceotance of Public Street into the Citv Maintained Street System (Portions of R|rtterfield Staoe Road and De Portola Road) RECOMMENDATION: 15.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 95- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREET CONSTRUCTED UNDER ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 159 INTO THE CITY MAINTAINED-STREET SYSTEM (BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD FROM DE PORTOLA ROAD TO STATE HIGHWAY 79|S) AND DE PORTOLA ROAD FROM BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD TO EASTERLY CITY LIMITS) It.V_ Lk'~l,llll · 16 17 18 Acceotance of FN,blic Rtreet into the r-;tv Meinteined-~q:Vet Ryetam (J'~e port, as Rhed - Marn.,*rite Road to Rutterfield StaGe Road) RECOMMENDATION: 16.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 95- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBUC STREET CONSTRUCTED UNDER ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 159 INTO THE CITY MAINTAINED-STREET SYSTEM (DE PORTOLA ROAD FROM MARGARITA ROAD TO BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD) Accent Public Imorovements in Tract No. ~1760 RECOMMENDATION: 17.1 Accept the public improvements in Tract No. 21760; 17.2 Authorize reduction Faithful Performance Bond amounts for streets, water and sewer improvements, accept the Faithful Performance Warranty Bond in the reduced amount; 17.3 Direct the City Clerk to so notify the Developer and Surety. Contract Amendment- Kicak and Associates RECOMMENDATION: 18.1 Approve an amendment to the Kicak and Associates contract. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 19 Second Reading of Ordinance No. 95-06 RECOMMENDATION: 19.1 Read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 95-06 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA REPEALING SECTION 6.04.010 AND ADDING CHAPTERS 6.02, 6.06 AND 6.08 TO THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE REGULATING THE KEEPING AND CONTROL OF DOGS, CATS AND OTHER ANIMALS P-OUNel 20 21 22 23 ;u raiNFee Reo-est to S:jooort the State of I~-wlifornia Wildlife Conservation Floard Acnuisition of the Hidden Valley Ranch RECOMMENDATION: 20.1 Receive report and provide direction to staff to draft a letter of support for the Mayor's signature. Winchester 1 800 Soecific Plan RECOMMENDATION: 21.1 Provide direction to staff to prepare City's official response to the Board of Supervisors April 11, 1995 hearing regarding Winchester 1800 Specific Ran. Status Reoort on Klassic Shot2 Billiards. Planning Aoolication No. PA 94-0043 RECOMMENDATION: 22.1 Receive and file report. Consideration of Adoption of Resolution AnDroving a Master Progerry Tax Exchanne Agreement Between the City of Temecula and the Countv of Riverside Uoon Anney~tions of Territory to the City RECOMMENDATION: 23.1 Adopt a resolution emitled: RESOLUTION NO. 95- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE MASTER PROPERTY TAX TRANSFER AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE UPON ANNEXATIONS OF TERRITORY TO THE CITY 24 Consideration of a Contract with DMn to Analyze Water and Sewer Imoact Fees RECOMMENDATION: 24, 1 Consider amending the contract with David M. Griffith and Associates (DMG) to conduct a Water and Sewer Impact Fee Review, &~eeweo22eN 7 25 26 27 28 29 Disc~ ,-~e;on of Installation of Rashina Wamina Uahts in the Vicinity of Sparkman --, Temec-l- Elementarv Schools. Temecula Valley Hioh School and Mamarite Middle ~-~AQSd (Requested by Mayor Stone - discussion Item Only) Overland nrive Overcrossing - Status Reoort RECOMMENDATION: 26.1 Review the status report, discuss and provide direction to staff as appropriBte. Street Maintenance and/or Construction of Unpaved Streets RECOMMENDATION: 27.1 Review the alternatives presented end provide direction to staff. Communitv Services Fundin0 Prooram RECOMMENDATIONS: 28.1 Consider the recommendations for the Community Services Funding Grants for FY 1994/95. Third Amendment to the Fire Protection Aoreement for Fiscal Year 1994~95 RECOMMENDATION: 29.1 Approve the Third Amendment of the Cooperative Agreement to Provide Fire Protection, Fire Prevention, Rescue and Medical Aid for the City of Temecula. 30 City Council Meeting Start Time RECOMMENDATION: 30.1 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 95- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING CHAPTER 2.04 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO THE TIME AND PLACE OF CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS 31 niscussion of Traffic Policeman Directina Traffic at Winchester and Jefferson nl ~ing Pexk Traffic Times of 4-6 PM (Oral discussion placed on the agenda by Mayor Stone) DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS CITY MANAGER'S REPORT CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: April 11, 1995, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. .TrMFCUI x COMMUNITY SqIVICI:S 'DISTRICT MrrrlNn - fro be held at 8~0). Next in Orderi Ordinance No. CSD 95-01 Resolution No. CSD 99-09 CALL TO ORDER: President Ronald H. Roberrs ROLL CALL: DIRECTORS: Lindemans, Mufioz, Parks, Stone, Roberts PUBLIC COMMENT: Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors, should present a completed pink 'Request to Speak' to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state vour name and address for the record. CONSENT CALENDAR I Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of February 14, 1995. 2 Parkview Site Imorovement Project - Phase I and Phase II RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve Amendment No. 2 of $28,425 to the design contract with RJM Design Group, Inc. for Phase I and Phase II of the Parkview Site Improvement Project. 2.2 Appropriate $27,625 from Public Facilities - Development Impact Fees to the Capital Projects Account. R.-v~lml~oa~e~ 1o DISTRICT BUSINESS 3 Considemtio~ of Adootion of Resolution Aoorovinn the Mester Prooertv Tax Fxchenne Agreement Retween Riverside Ceetv and the Temec-l* Comm-nitv Rentices nistrict Regarding Pronerty Sutiject to Annexation RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: 'RESOLUTION NO. CSD95- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT, APPROVING THE MASTER PROPERTY TAX TRANSFER AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AND THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE UPON ANNEXATIONS OF TERRITORY TO THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT GENERAL MANAGERS REPORT - Bradley DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT - Nelson BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS ADJOURNMENT: Next meeting: April 11, 1995, 8:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. R..U._ '-~'12111 11 TI:MFCULA RFDFVFLOPMq~IT A'G~ICY MFFTINI3 Next in Order: Ordinance No. RDA 95-07 Resolution No. RDA 95-O1 CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Ronald J. Parks presiding ROLL CALL: AGENCY MEMBERS: Lindemans, Mufioz, Roberrs, Stone, Parks PUBLIC COMMENT: Anyone wishing to address the Agency, should present a completed pink · 'Request to Speak" to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address for the record. CONSENT CALENDAR I Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of February 14, 1995. 2 Redeveloement Newsletter RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the appropriation of funds for a second issue of the Redevelopment Newsletter entitled The Graoevine. 3 Review and Aooroval of the 1994-95 Mid-Year Bud{iets RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. RDA 95- A RESOLUTION OF THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGETS AGENCY BUSINESS 4 5 Professional Services with Trans-Paci~c Consultants for Design of Phase I of the Western Rvoass Corridor RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Approve and authorize the Chairperson or the authorized representative to execute an agreement between the City and Trana-Pacific Consultants ('rPC) to provide civil engineering services for the design of Phase I of the Wastam Bypass Corridor for an amount not to exceed ;451,928.60 and 10% contingency in the amount of ;45,192.86. The agreement will be subject to the approval of the Executive Director and the General Counsel as to final form. 4.2 Appropriate; 167,122 of RDA bond proceeds in the Capital Improvement Program fund for the design of the Western Bypass Corridor Phase I. Informational Reoort - T.7.B.~-.. Inc. and Fluor Daniel. Inc. RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Receive and file report. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT AGENCY MEMBER'$ REPORTS ADJOURNMENT: Next Meeting: Temecula, California. April 11, 1995, 8:00 PM, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, PROCLAMATIONS/ PRESENTATIONS The City of Temecula PROCLAMATION WHs:ql?-&tl, for.the vast majority Of~C-lifi~d~n% owning a ~ iS Imt of ~ AmeriCan dremn; and WH m'-:t';'-A.~, Califomia's ~wue.,ship ~ of 56.8 hnf short of th~ :-,don.at rate of ~,.Sperm~ and WUi;gEAS, in recent years, the major obstacle to achieving the Ameri~n dream of owning a home has been a shortage of affordable housing, dlmcxdty in obtaining a large downpayment and finding an affordable home loan program, and lack of unders~ing about .. Wlfiml~-AR, today's inlet. st rates, affordable homes fin~nelng ~, and lower housingpdces make the dream of home ownenhip ~le for tens of thousands of Califomia renters; and Vat.my-AS, the California Homebuyer Education Parmership seeks to provide education and training to assist homebuyers in general, and tint-time, minority, and low-to- moderate income homebuyen in particular; NOW, TRI~REFORE, I, Jef~y E. Stone, on behalf of the City Council of the City of Temecula, hereby proclaim April, 1995 m be *Horn.buyer Education Month' IN WITNESS W~F, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City of Temecula to be affi~ this 28th day of March, 1995. ~une S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk The Cily of Temecula PROCLAMATION undamadiag of, such i,~Oo~hat jutins as mimic safety, growth managemint, ,-'cem*bRity for people with dighnid,.a, hLqoric geamva~_.aa, mergy cemezvalio~ hOV,,in_~ for the homeless, W~EREAS, The .annedc~ Tn~nne of Az~tec% California Counu'l (AIACC), in reprf.,u, ating ~rchitet~ ~ld the BreMtec~ff~l lltOff. tqiO~ in Caljf(Rnia, has wm'k~ in concert with government's regulation of their indtmt~es; and NOW, Tmm~"ORE, I, ~eff~ E. Stone, on behalf of the City Councn of the City of Temecula, hereby proclaim week of March 26 through April 1, 1995 ID be ".,au. rhitectnre Week in Temecub" IN WITNESS wBJae~OF, I have hereunto set my hand and mused the Seal of the City of Temecula to be afTRed this 28th day of March, 1995. *** 7emey E. Sumc, Mayor ~une S. Greek, cMC, City ITEM 1 ITEM 2 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL FEBRUARY 14, 1995 A regular meeting of the Temecula City Council was called to order Tuesday, February 14, 1995, 7:00 P.M., at the City of Temecula Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California, Mayor Jeffrey Stone presiding. PRESENT: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Lindemans, Mufioz, Parks, Roberts, Stone ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None Also present were City Manager Ronald Bradley, Assistant City Manager Mary Jane McLarney, City Attorney Peter Thorsen and City Clerk June S. Greek. INVOCATION Assistant Pastor Derek Thomas, Rancho Temecula Valley Church, led the invocation. FLAG SALUTE Councilmember Roberrs led the flag salute. PRESENTATIONS/ PROCLAMATIONS Mayor Stone proclaimed the following as: * February 19 through February 25, 1995, National Engineer's Week. * February 18 and 19, 1995, Rod Run Days. * May 1995, White House Conference on Aging Month. A Certificate of Special Achievement was presented to Barbara Affolter for being appointed as representative to the California Senior Legislature. A Certificate of Appreciation was presented to Captain Rick Sayre, Temecula's First Chief of Police. PUBLIC COMMENTS Samuel Scott, Community Music School, 41125 Winchester Road, Suite B1, Temecula, introduced the Community Music School programs to the' City Council and asked for the City's support in establishing a School of Arts in the City of Temecula. Joseph Terrazas, 31160 Lahontan Court, Temecula, apologized to staff for his behavior st a previous City Council meeting and asked for a clarification on conduit financing. It41tCC CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 0~/1419B Theresa McLeod, 42200 Main Street, #F128, Temecula, asked if Zev Buffman would be providing a performance bond on the Entertainment Project. Ms. McLeod asked if the bond payments will be deferred during construction. City Manager Ron Bradley explained the bonds will be paid once the project is operating. Mayor Storm said there was a request to continue Item No. 6 - School Mitigation Program Resolution for two weeks. The City Attorney confirmed the Council could move to continue Item No. 6 for two weeks prior to any other Council action. Councilmember Mufioz and Councilmember Parks stepped down due to a conflict of interest. It was moved by Councilmember Robarts, seconded by Mayor Pro Tam Lindemans to continue the School Mitigation Program Resolution for two weeks. The motion carried as follows: AYES: 3 COUNCILMEMBERS: Lindemsns, Roberts, Stone NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 CO UNCI LMEMBERS: None COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: 2 COUNCILMEMBERS: Muftoz, Parks Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans requested staff investigate scheduling a joint meeting of the City Council and the Riverside County Board of Supervisors. Mayor Stone requested staff schedule a future workshop on the mitigation fees currently levied by various agencies. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Councilmember Roberts asked for a status report on the Capital Improvement Projects. Councilmember Robarts said he has heard concerns expressed that the Capital Improvement Projects are being placed on hold until the outcome of the Old Town Entertainment Project election. Director of Public Works Joe Kicak explained that no CIP projects are being placed on hold st this time. He said the only project which may be affected will be the Western Bypass Corridor which is on its own schedule. Mayor Stone asked the status of the interim signals for Highway 79 South and La Paz; Pale Road; and Margarita Road. /~' CITY COUNCIl MINUTFS 0~/14195 Director Kicak said staff has received proposals and will be presenting those at the next City Council meeting for the interim improvements, Mayor Stone advised that he is available every Tuesday at City Hall to discuss concerns with residents, Mayor Stone said he will look at possibly scheduling a monthly open forum for the community to come and discuss issues and concerns, Mayor Stone re-opened the Public Comment portion of the meeting to allow the following comments: Bonnie Corbin, Marcedes and Third Street, Temecula, expressed concerns about the zoning on her property. Ms. Corbin said the zoning limits the uses on the property. CONSENT CALF:NDAR It was moved by Mayor Pro Tern Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember Parks to approve Consent Calendar Items 1 - 4. The motion was carried as follows: AYES: 5 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: Lindemans, Mui~oz, Parks, Robarts, Stone None None the agenda. 2. Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 2.2 3. Resolution Aoorovino List of Demands RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: Approve the minutes of January 17, 1995. Approve the minutes of January 24, 1995. Standard Ordinance Adootion Procedure RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 0~/14195 ~ RESOLUTION NO. 95-10 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTNN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A City Treasurer's Reoort RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Receive and file the City Treasurer's Report as of December 31, 1994. PUBLIC HEARINGS e Abatement of Hazardous Vegetation from Vacant Lots or Parcels oar Ordinance 91-18. Chaoter 6.16 Building Official Tony Elmo presented the staff report. Mayor Stone opened the public hearing at 7:50 P.M. Bonnie Corbin, Marc.des Street, Temecula, said she received a weed abatement notice end was working to clear her properties however, the City of Temecula Public Works department made improvements to the culvert on her property and they have not restored her property to its original condition. City Manager Ron Bradley responded that staff will work with Ms. Corbin to resolve the problem. It was moved by Mayor Pro Tam Lind.mane, seconded by Councilmember Robarts to approve staff recommendation as follows: 5.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 95-11 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ORDERING CONFIRMATION OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AGAINST PARCELS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR COSTS OF ABATEMENT AND REMOVAL OF HAZARDOUS VEGETATION The motion carried as follows: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Lindemans, Muttoz, Parks, Robarts, Stone NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ~4ei~c 4 m CITY P-OUNCIL MINUT;S ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None Mayor Stone declared · recess at 7:55 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 8:30 P.M. COUNCIL BUSINESS 0~11 4195 ADDointment to the Old Town Temecula Historical Preservation District Local Review Board Mayor Stone stepped down due to a conflict of interest. City Clerk June S. Greek presented the staff report. Councilmember Parks said he nominated Bill Harker for the position because Mr. Harker has been on the advisory board for many years and he feels the continuity is necessary at this time. Councilmember Mufioz said he is recommending Cathleen Kreus be appointed because he feels it is beneficial to encourage new ideas. It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Robarts to appoint Bill Harker to serve the unexpired term on the Old Town Local Review Board. The motion carried as follows: AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Lindemsns, Parks, Muf~oz, Robarts NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: I COUNCILMEMBERS: Stone e Interim Fire Station Proiect Community Services Director Shawn Nelson presented the staff report. It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember Parks to approve staff recommendation as follows: 8.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 95-12 CITY COUNCIL MINUlq:S 0~114/'95 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A LEASE WITH UNFIELD SCHOOL FOR THE TEMPORARY FIRE STATION SITE 8.2 8.3 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 95-13 ARESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A LEASE WITH MOBILE MODULAR. MANAGEMENT CORPORATION FOR MODULAR UNITS TO BE UTILIZED AT THE TEMPORARY FIRE STATION Appropriate $35,000 from Development Impact Fees (Fire Mitigation Fees) to provide equipment for the new fire engine at the Interim Fire Station. The motion was carried as follows: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 Lindemens, Muf~oz, Parks, Robarts, Stone COUNCILMEMBERS: None COUNCILMEMBERS: None Discussion of Imoacts of the Winchester 1800 Soecific Plan #286 Planning Director Gary Thornhill advised staff has information on this project and staff's response to the E.I.R. were submitted to the City Clerk. Director Thornhill said after hearing the plan, the Riverside County Planning Commission recommended denial and took no action on the E.I.R. He said the County Board of Supervisors referred the project back to staff with concerns relating to densities and design. Councilmember Muf~oz said he feels staff time should be provided to review these types of projects. He also expressed concern about the cumulative impacts large specific plans, which are in the City's sphere of influence, will have the city ultimately. Cheri Fresonke, 32571 Ga!leano, Winchester, said she is against the proposed project. Ms. Fresonke said the children who live in the area now, all go to Temecula schools and she understands the developer is providing the land for schools however, is not funding any schools. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 09/14195 Bill LaForge, 32523 Galleano, Winchester, expressed his opposition to the plan. Adrianna McGregor, 34555 Madua del Plays, Temecula, proxy for Dean McGregor, expressed concerns relating to the impacts of the project. James Moropoulos, 32515 Buena Venture Road, Temecula, expressed concerns regarding the project's impacts. Adrianna McGregor, proxy for Robert Wheeler, 24280 Washington Avenue, Murrieta, expressed opposition to the proposed project. Mr. Wheeler prepared a statement asking staff to review the cumulative impacts of the project. Adrianna McGregor, 34555 Madua del Plays, Temecula, expressed opposition to the project. Councilmember Perks said he supports budgeting of staff time for evaluation of these projects. Councilmember Robarts said he would like to review the staff report from the Riverside County Board of Supervisors. The overall consensus of the Council was to direct staff to prepare a letter to the Riverside County Board of Supervisors, for the Mayor's signature, requesting that consideration of Specific Plan #286 be continued to allow the City of Temecula opportunity to prepare their comments. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT None CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT Closed Session report: Council took action to refer the claim of Charles Miller to the City's Claims Administrator Carl Warren and Company ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Councilmember Roberrs, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans to adjourn at 9:35 P.M. The motion was unanimously carried. The next meeting of the Temecula City Council will be held on Tuesday, February 21, 1995, 7:00 PM, Economic Development Workshop, City Hall Main Conference Room, 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. ~4ILCC 7 CITY ~tiUNCII MINUTI:S 0~114195 ~. The next meeting of the Temecule City Council will be held on Monday, February 27, 1995, 7:00 PM, Joint City Council/Planning Commission, City Hall Main Conference Room, 43174 Business- Park Drive, Temecule, California. The next regular meeting of the Temecula City Council will be held on Tuesday, February 28, -. 1995, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. Mayor Jeffrey Stone ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk ITEM 3 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ATJOVi/ING CERTAIN .CIAI1VIS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN ~:xHsRIT A THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES I~-~OLVF,, DETERMII~ AND ORDER AS FOIJ-0WS: Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A have been audited by the City .Manager, and that the same are hereby allowed in the amount of 1,041,~44.34. Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 28th day of March, 1995. ATI'EST: Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk, CMC i~1ol54 I STATE OF CAL~:~ORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 9~- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 28th day of March, 1995 by the following roll call vote: AYES: 0 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 COUNTERS: None COUNTERS: None COUNCH,MEMBERS: None June S. Greek, City Clerk, CMC CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS 03/09/95 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 0311 6/95 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 03/28/95 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 03/08/95 TOTAL PAYROLL: TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 03/28/95 COUNCIL MEETING: DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND: CHECKS: F 031 GENERAL 103 GAS TAX 120 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FUND 140 COMMUNFrY DEV BLOCK GRANT 165 RDA-I.C)VV/MOD 190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ (CIP) 220 MARGARITA ROAD REIMB. DIST. 250 CAPITAL PROJECTS - TCSD 280 RDA-CIP 300 INSURANCE 310 VEHICLES 320 INFORMATIONS SYSTEMS 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 340 FACILITIES 380 RDA-DEBT SERVICE 390 TCSD DEBT SERVICE PAYROLL: 001 GENERAL 1 O0 GAS TAX 165 RDA-LOW/MOD 190 TCSD 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 280 RDA-CIP 303 INSURANCE 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 340 FACILITIES TOTAL BY FUND: RONALD E. BRADLEY, CITY MANAGER $ 217,406.81 103,54,9.41 600,614.35 115,173.77 $ 1 ;041,744.34 456,443.88 103,660.83 0.00 0.00 1,4,97.76 36,543.08 4,613.60 414.S3 4,482.88 0.03 286,744.52 0.00 0.00 6,584.26 0.00 9,411.22 1,91 5.41 4,941.44 0.03 2,628.56 71,760.58 14,942.90 621.27 20,044.51 464.01 949.4,9 1,80~.95 732.61 235.93 1,547.13 684.17 1,981.22 $ 926,570.57 115,173.77 $ 1,041,744.34 , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. VOUCHItEZ 0)/0~/~ 15:08 CITY OF TB4ECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 100 GAS TAX FUll 165 RDA DEV- LOM/14OD SET ASIDE 1~0 (:~II4UNITY SERVICES DZSTRiCT 191 TCSO SERVICE LEVEL A 1~2 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 1F3 TCSD SERV]CE LEVEL C 210 CAPITAL ]I4PROVB4ENT PROJ FUND 280 REDEVELOPHENT AGENCY - C]P 300 INSURANCE FUND 320 INFORI4ATION SYSTENS 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 360 FAC]LITIES TOTAL 107, 127.66 65,955.75 497.76 22,49~ 4,496.72 414.33 2,326.69 600. O0 323.76 1,578.80 5,675.66 1,476.00 4,8~1 217,4~0~.81 15:08 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK' VEIIX3R VENDOR NIMBER DATE MIllER IIANE 443489 03/(~/95 000283 FIRSTAX(IRS) /~348~ 03/0~/95 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 4434~ 03/0~/~5 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) ~ 03/09/95 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) Z~3489 03/09/95 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS} ~43/e8~ 03/09/95 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 4~3/,8~ 03/09/~5 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS} ~4:~8~ 03/0~/95 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 44:~89 03/09/95 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 443/,89 03/0~/95 00028~ FIRSTAX (IRS) 443~89 03/09/95 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS~ 443~89 03/09/95 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 4/,3/e89 03/09/95 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) ~4~,89 03/09/95 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 443~,89 03/09/95 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 443489 03/09/95 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 443489 03/09/~5 000283 FIRSTAX ([RS) 44348~ 03/0~/~5 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 443~89 03/09/f5 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 443Z~89 03/0~/95 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 03/0~/95 00028~ FIRSTAX (IRS) 03/09/95 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 6 03/0~/~5 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS) 443489 03/09/95 000283 FIRSTAX (ZRS) 462451 03/09/95 000/4~4 FIRSTAX (EDD) 462~51 03/09/95 00~ FIRSTAX CEDD) 462451 03/09/95 000~ FIRSTAX (EOD) ~62451 03/09/95 OOO~ FIRSTAX (EDD) z~2451 03/09/95 00044A FIRSTAX (EDD) 462451 03/09/95 OOL~ FIRSTAX (EDD) 462451 03/09/95 OOe~ FIRSTAX (EDD) 462451 03/09/95 OOO~ FIRSTAX (EDD) 462451 03/09/95 O004AA FIRSTAX (EOD) 462451 03/09/95 O00~AA FIRSTAX (EDD) /.62/,51 03/09/95 OOE~ FIRSTAX (EDD) ~62451 03/09/95 O00z~4 FIRSTAX (EDD) ~2451 03/09/95 O004Z~ FIRSTAX (EDD) 46245103/0~/95 0004/~ FIRSTAX (EDD) 462451 03/09/95 O00Z~4 FIRSTAX (EDD) 462451 03/09/95 00~ FIRSTAX (EDD) /,62451 03/0~/95 _O~v_.-~ FIRSTAX (El)D) 462451 03/0~/95' 00~ FIRSTAX (EDD) 2259~ 03109195 000680 A N S - T N S 2259~ 03109195 000680 A M S - T M S 2259~ 03109195 000680 A 14 S - T N S 2259/, 03/09/95 000680 A 14 S - T N S 2259~ 03/09/95 000680 A 14 S - T N S ~ 03/09/95 000680 AMS-TNS 03/09/95 000680 A M S - T H S Cl~( OF ~CIAA VOUCHER/CHECK RfiGIMBt FOR ALL PBtlO~S ITEM DESCRIPTION 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAl. 0002.83 FEDERAL 000203 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 00028:5 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 lIED ! CARE 000283 MEDICARE 00028~ MED I CARE O002lG MED ! CARE 000283 FlED I CARE 000283 M~D 1 CARE 00028:5 lIED I CARE 00028.5 MED 1 CARE 0002K5 MED I CARE 00028~ MEO I CARE O004z~ SOl O004J~ SOl 000,(4~ EDI O00(P~ STATE O004J~ STATE 00(0~ STATE 000/,/~ STATE ~ STATE ~ ~ATE ~ STATE O~ STATE ~ STATE ~ STATE 00~ STATE 00~ STATE ~T OF ~1-1~ P/R IN J~ ~ OF ~I-1ST P/R IN J~ ~T ~ ~I-1ST P/R IN J~ POSTAGE ACCGJNT POSTAGE ACCOUNT POSTAGE ACCOUNT POSTAGE ACCOUNT POSTAGE ACCOUNT POSTAGE AC_r~a__,qT POSTAGE ACCOUNT A_CC~__NT MIMBER '300-2070 320-2070 330-2070 340-2070 001-2070 100-2070 165-2070 1~0-2070 191-2070 192-2070 1~3-2070 280-2070 300-2070 320-2070 330-2070-~ 340-2070- 001-2070 100-2070 1~0-2070 001-2070 100-2070 165-2070 1~0-2070 191-2070 192-2070 1~-2070 280-2070 300-2070 320-2070 330-2070 34e-2o70 ool -2070 10o-2070 oo1-10o::;-5230 ool - 110'-';-5230 oo1-12o-;-52~o ool - 1~.-;-523o 001-160~f~j~-5230 001-150-~-5230 001-161-~-5230 ITE~ NIX jilT 10,519.16 2,293.47 78.18 2,516.17 69.60 21.00 213.80 45.54 18.50 108.74 118.~ 2,~51.52 535.36 21.31 17.70 13.38 64,10 17,80 7.f3 57,96 23,9Z 64,32 28.85 8.95 32.38 2,r'/3.6~ 592.07 17.57 55o.18 16.75 2.96 45.87 9.34 5.03 20.08 13.6~ 25.81 - 1L01 - 26.~- 13.22 179.50 ~46.03 457.18 1,304.95 233.09 422.63 PAGE 1 CHECK N40UNT 20,/,20.92 6,113.86 VIXJCHERI CHECK NIJHBER 22595 22595 22595 22595 22595 22595 22595 22595 22595 22595 22595 22595 22595 22595 225~6 22597 22597 22598 22599 225c~ 22600 22600 22602 22603 22604 22606 22604 22606 2260,r, 2260~ 22605 226O6 22606 22606 15:08 CBECK DATE ~/~/95 ~/~/95 ~/~/95 03/09/95 03/O9195 03/09/95 03/09/95 03/09/95 031099195 03109195 03109195 03/09/95 03/09/95 03/09/95 03/O9/95 03/09/95 03109195 mR OOO68O 0OO68O OOO68O OOQ116 000116 QOQ116 OO0116 000116 000116 0(0116 OOQ116 OO0116 000116 0O0116 000116 OO0116 OO0116 000101 001323 001323 001886 001721 001721 001721 000679 00067~ 001201 001021 000131 OOQ131 OO0131 QOQ131 OO0131 000131 Q00135 OO01/O 0O0160 0OO160 M ARS-TRS AHS-THS ANS-TNS AVPVZSZONP~S AVPVZSIONPLANS AVPVISIONPLANS AVPVISIONPLANS AVPVISIONPLANS AVPVISIONPLANS AVPVISIONPLANS AVPVISIONPIJUIS AVPVISIONPLANS AVPVISIOHPLANS AVPVZSIONPI,MIS AVPVISIONPIJUtS AVPVISIONPLANS AVPVISIONPLANS APPLE ONE, INC. ARRONHEAD HATER, INC. ARRONHEAD HATER, INC. BARCLAYS AMERICAN NTG. BASELINE SOFTHARE, INC. BASELINE SOFTHARE, INC. BASELINE SOFTHARE, INC. BOGRAPHICS PRINTING PLU BOGRAPHICS PRINTING PLU BUSINESS MEEK C A P P O, INC. CALIFORNIA GANG INVEST] CARL WARREN &CO., INC. CARL kVLRREN &CO., INC. CARL UARREN & CO,, INC. CARL BARREN & CO., INC. CARL MARREN & CO., INC. CARL WARREN & CO., INC. CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN CO(.ONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN CITY OF ~ VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL palOOs ITEH DESCRIPTION POSTAGE ACCOUMT POSTAGE ACCQUMT POSTAGE ACCOUNT 000116 AVP 000116 AVP REVE 000116 AVP 000116 AVP 000116 AVP 000116 AVP 000116 AVP 000116 AVP 000116 AVP 000116 AVP 000116 AVP 000116 AVP COBIt O00116 AVP DED OVRPHT ON HARCH 95 STATEMENT TEMP HELP VIE 2/23 KLUKAS BOTTLE HATER FOR CITY HALL BOTTLE HATER O CITY YARD SALES TAX ASSISTANCE INFONIqATION SECURITY POLICIES FREIGHT TAX RECEIPT BOOKS FOR RECREATION TAX RENEWAL-STARTING 6195-51 ISSUE PURCN ASSOC.3/1/95-2/28/96 CO NF:OLrrLAW MOTOR SANG 3/~-31 08102/92 INTZIGER, LINDA 1116/93 NURRIETA CREEK FLOODIN 02/11/93 STATE FANN/J. HNeION 1/16/93 INDIAN OAKS, LTD. 12/1/93 MRIGHT, AleREW 2/19/9~ RICHTER, SANDEA L. K ~T W/BASE FOR STREET 14AINT OO01/0 600ALS 000160 600A&S 000160 CANCElt ACCOUNT mR lOO-166-606-5230 320-199-999-5230 lOO-199C) 001-2310 001-2310 001-2310' .' 100-2310 - 165-2310. lOO-2310 191-2310 193-2310 280-2310 :500-2310 340-2310 001-1180 001-2310 001-2310 001-160-999-5118 340-199-999-5260 100-166-601-5260 001-2030 320- 320-109-9(j'~-5228 320-109-;-5228 lOO- 180'999-5301 lOO- 180:999'5301 001 ' 110-999'5228 001-160-999-5226 001-170-999-5261 300-199-999-5205 3OO- 109-999-5205 3OO- 199-999-5205 300-199-999-5205 300-199-999-5205 :500-199-999-5205 100-16~-601-52A4 001-2330 190-2330 001-2330 ITBI A!4OUNT 158.0~ 12.71 297.01 1.52 1.52- 395.96 91.18 6.68 52.9O 6.39 5.36 3.34 16.70 9.3'5 1.52 23.90- 10:5.20 136.95 200.7O 695 .OO 15.OO 35 .OO 216.55 16.8 ~.95 65 .OO 130.00 176.63 522.OO 50.25 89.38 176.OO 229.75 67.G6. 39.75 :59.75 152.67 CHECK 3,525.06 56~ .30 103.20 5~5 .OO 231.18 66.95 65 .OO 130.OO 1,242.01 67.0~ 15:06 VOUCHER/ CHECk: CHECK VEI)OR NUMBER DATE NI.J4BER 22606 0~109195 00014~) 22606 03109195 00014,0 22606 03109195 00014,0 22606 03109195 00014,0 22606 03/09/95 000140 22607 03/09/95 001275 22608 03109195 000~2 22610 0;$109195 001200 22611 03109195 M COLONIAL LIFE & ACClDEN COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDBd COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN COLONIAL LIFE & ACClDEN COLONIAL LIFE & ACClDEN CONPUSERVE, INC. COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS COUNTS UNLINITED CRAFTSHEN PLtlBING HEAT CRONKHITE, MICHELLE 22612 03109195 000155 DAVLIN 22613 03109195 000156 22613 03109195 000156 2~.A.1~ 03/09/95 000156 03/09/95 000156 03/09/95 000156 22614 03/09/95 001669 22614 03/09/95 001669 22614 03/09/95 001669 22614 03/09/95 001669 22615 03/09/95 000523 22616 03/09/95 001135 22617 03/09/95 000643 22617 03/09/95 000643 22618 03/09/95 000993 22619 03109195 0001~ 22619 ~109195 000184 22619 03109195 0001~ 22619 0;$109195 00016/, 22619 0:$109195 0001~ 22620 03/099/95 000177 22620 03/09/95 000177 22620 03109195 000177 22620 03/09/95 000177 22620 03/09/95 000177 7""' 03/09/95 000177 DENTICARE OF CALIFORNIA DENTICARE OF CALIFORNIA DENTICARE OF CALIFONNIA DENTICARE OF CALIFORNIA DENTICARE OF CALIFORNIA DUNN EDgARDS CORPORATIO DUNN EDMARDS CO~PORATIO DUNN EDUARDS CORPORATIO DUNN EDgARDS CORPORATIO EASTERN MIJNICIPAL gATER FIRST CARE INDUSTRIAL N FORTNER HANDHARE, INC. FONTNER HARDHARE, INC. FREEDON COFFEE, INC. G T E CALIFORNIA - PAT!q G T E CALIFORNIA - PAY!q G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYIq G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYN G T E CALIFORNIA - PA~q GLENNIES OFFICE Plffil)UCT GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT GLENNIES OFFICE PROOtJCT GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT GLENNIE$ OFFICE PRODUCT GLENNIES OFFICE PROOUCT CITY OF/BeEaliA VOUCIlil/ClECl SISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITB4 DESCEIPTION 000140 CANCER O001Q) CANCER 0001/,0 CAMCER 000140 CANCER FEB 95 USAGE CHARGE ALARH MONITOP41 CITY NALL QTRLY" TRAFFIC CENSUS IMSTER STATIONS INSTALL GARBAGE DISPOSALISle CT REFUMD FON TCSO CLASS AIX)IO/TAPE COUNCIL 2/28/95 000156 DENT-HEV 000156 DENTICAR 000156 DEN-MIN 000156 DENT-AOV 000156 OENTZCAR RECYCLED GRAFFITI PAINT TAX RECYCLED GRAFFITI PAINT TAX EASEMENT FOR 115 & VIMCHESTER PRE-EHPLOYMENT PHYSICAL/BAKER TCSD HAINT SUPPLIES NISC. SUPPLIES FOR COFFEE SUPPLIES CITY HALL 909 181-1123 GEN 909 695-356~ CITY NALL ALARN 909 t-01Z8 GEN 909 699-6~67 FILIt COUNCIL 909 699-7~5 CRC FIRE ALARN NISC OFFICE SUPPLIES NISC. OFFICE SlIPPLIES MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES MISt OFFICE SUPPLIES MISt. OFFICE $1JPPLIES OFFICE $tJPPLIES TCND 100-2330 190-2330 191-2330 193-2330 320-199-999-5228 34,0-199-999-5250 100-164,-602-5~6 190-181-999-5Z12 190-183-4,982 001-100-999-5230 001-1180 001-2340 001 -Z~O 001-1180 001-2340 100-164-601-5218 100-164-601-5218 100-164-601-5218 100-164-001-5218 210-165-602-5700 001-150-999-524,8 190-180-999-5212 100-164-601-5218 34,0-199-999-5250 320-199-999-5208 320-199-999-5200 ;$20-199-999-52OD 320-199-999-5208 320-199-999-5208 001 - 110-999-5220 001-1&0-999-5220 001-110-999-5220 001-110-999-5220 001-140-999-5220 190-180-999-5220 ITEN NeUNT 12.9~. 83.64 14,.35 17.53 5.18 16.11 135.00 A60.00 701.67 7.84,- 7.84~ 7.~ 7.84. 135.73 10.52 92.80 7.19 300.00 65.00 218.5;$ 169.61 165.35 545.13 52.01 1.152.;$1 53.56 7.~ 80.81 2.~8 9.)0 91.18 10.85 PA~E CHECK NIIUIIT 365.61 16.11 135.00 800.OD /~).00 701.61 ~88.14, 165 35 201.88 VOUCHER/ CHECK 22623 22623 22623 22623 22623 22623 22623 22623 22623 22623 22623 22624 22625 22625 22626 22626 22626 22626 22626 22626 22626 22626 22626 22626 22626 22626 22626 22626 22626 22626 22626 22626 22626 22626 22626 15:08 CHECK DATE ~/~/~ ~/~/95 ~/~/~ ~/W/~ ~/~/~ ~/~/~ ~/~/K ~/~/~ ~/~/95 03/O9/~5 03109195 03/09/95 03~09~95 03/09/95 031009195 03/09/95 03/09/95 VEIQOR NUMBER 000430 000430 oo0430 000430 000430 000430 000430 000430 000430 000430 000430 000430 000186 000186 001536 001536 0015~6 001536 001536 001536 001536 0015~6 O01536 001536 001536 001536 001536 001536 001536 001536 0015~6 001536 0015~6 M GLOeAL ~ER StRaPLIE GLOBAL ~ER SUPPLIE GLOBAL COMPUTER IUPPLIE GLOBAL CaePUTER SI. FPLIE GLOBAL COMPUTER SU~LIE GLOBAL CONPUTER SUPPLIE GLOgAL ~ER ~PPLIE -GLOBAL (:014PUTER SUPPLIE GLOBAL COlINTER $UPPLIE GOVERNING GROUP HRICA - VOLUIITA GROUP ANERICA - VOLIMTA GROUP HRICA - VOUMTA GROUP HRICA - VOLUNTA GROUP AHER l CA - VOLUNTA GROUP AHERICA - VOLUNTA GROUP AHERICA - VOLUNTA GROUP N4ERICA - VOLUNTA GROUP NqER]CA - VOLUNTA GROIJP ANER]CA - VOLUNTA GROUP ANERICA - VOLUNTA GROUP NqERICA - VOLUNTA HANKS HARDUARE, INC. HANKS HARDVARE, INC. HARTFORD L[FE INSURANCE HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE HARTFORD L]FE INSURANCE HARTFORD LIFE [NSIJ~NCE HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE HARTFORD LIFE ]NiCE HARTFORD LIFE INSIMRNCE HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE HARTFOIU) LIFE INSURANCE HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE HARTFOeD LIFE INSURANCE HARTFORD LIFE INSIMANCE HARTFORD LIFE ]NICE HARTFOIU) LIFE INSURANCE HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE CITY OF TENECIA.A ICHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESORIPT[OIt HPJEI'DIRECTPR!IrrSERVER FREIGHT TAX $NART-UPSPOMERBAClOJP FREIGHT TAX HP LETTER PRINTER TRAY FREIGHT TAX PRINTING COST FOR SU~SCEIPTION O00&30 VL REVER 000430 VOL LIFE 000~30 VOL L[FE 000~30 VOL LIFE 000~30 VOL L l FE 000/,30 VOL LIFE 000430 VL ADVAX 0004~0 VOL LIFE 000430 VOL LIFE 000430 VOL LIFE 000430 VOL LIFE 000430 VOL LIFE VELLUI4 FOR tIESTERN BY PASS IqAINT. SUPPLIES FOR CITY HALL TCSD )fAINT SUPPLIES 001536 LIFE INS 001536 LIFE INS 001536 LIFE INS 001536 LIFE INS 001536 LIFE INS 001536 LIFE INS 001536 LIFE INS 001536 LIFE INS 001536 LIFE INS 0015:56 LIFE INS 0015:56 LIFE InS 001536 LIFE INS 001536 LTD 001536 LTD 001536 LTD 0015:~ LTD 001536 LTD 001536 LTD 001536 LTD 001536 LTD 001536 LTD ACCOUNT NUNBER 320-199-999-5221 320-199-f~9-5221 320-199-999-5221 3Z0-199:999-5221 320-199-999-5221 320-199-999-5221 320-199-999-5221 320-199-999-5221 320-199-999-5221 001 - 110-999-5228 001-2510 001 -~510 100-2310 190-~510 192-~510 3~0-~510 0ol-25io 001-Z510 10o-2510 190-231o 192-2510 7~0-2510 100-166-60~-5268 ~43-199-999-5212 190;180-999-5212 001-2360 100-2360 165-2360 190-2360 191 -Z360 192-Z360 193-2360 320-2360 O01-2380 100-2380 165-2380 190-2380 191-2380 192-2380 193-Z380 300-Z580_ ITEN 3?9.95 11.75 30.08 346.95 13.56 27.35 49.49 6.4.8 4.00 190.80- 138.91 15.79 29.69 6.00 .61 190.80 138.91 15.79 29.68 .62 53.50 395.82 585.50 120.00 144.50 4.50 10.00 15.50 2.00 2.50 10.00 10.00 21.50 616.87 126.55 5.6~ 6.53 5,17 16, 10 3,17 1.8~ 867.61 9.0O 381.60 5'5.50 62O.55 15:08 V~UCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENI)OR NUIIER DATE IIIER 22626 03109/95 22626 0)109195 001536 22626 0)109195 0015)6 22626 03/09/~5 001536 22626 03109195 001536 22626 03109195 001536 22626 03/09/95 001536 ~ 03/09/95 001536 22626 03/09/95 001536 22626 03/09/95 001536 22626 03/09/95 001536 22626 03/09/95 001536 22626 03/09/95 O01536 22626 03/09/95 001536 22626 O3/09/95 001536 22628 03/09/95 001517 22628 03/09/95 001517 22628 03/09/95 001517 ,~...9 03/09/95 · 03/09/95 0016~. 22630 03/09/95 001644 22630 03/09/95 001(~. 22630 03/09/95 22631 03/0~/95 001720 22631 03/09/95 001720 22632 03/09/95 000194 22632 03/09/95 00019~ 22632 03/09/95 000194 22632 03/09/95 000194 22632 03/0~/95 000194 22632 03109195 000194 22632 03/09/95 000194 22632 03/09/95 000194 lIME HARTFOIID LIFE INSURAIICE HARTFORD LIFE INCURNICE HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE HARTFORD LIFE INSUIUUICE HARTF(ID LIFE INSURANCE HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE HARTFCID LIFE INSURANCE HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE HARTKID LIFE INSURANCE HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE HEALTH & HUHAN RESOURCE HEALTH & HUMAN RESOURCE HEALTH & HUllAN RESOURCE HILL, LEIGH HILLCREST CONTRACTING, HILLCREST CONTRACTING, HILLCREST CONTRACTING, HILLCREST CONTRACTING, HOHETRONICS, INC. HOHETRONICS, INC. RETIREIENT TRUS RETIREHENT TRUS RETIRElENT TRUS RETIRElENT TITUS RETIRElENT TRUS RETIRENEMT TRUS RETIRElENT TRUS RETIRElENT TRUS 22633 03/09/95 000863 X P N A 2263~ 03109195 22635 03109195 22636 03/09/95 001887 22637 03/09/95 000206 ~ 03/09/95 000209 03/09/95 000209 INTERRATIONAL AS$OC. OF JACUBIRAS, HENRY KENPER LUI4BERHANS KINKO'S OF RIVERSIDE, L & N FERTILIZER, INC. L & N FERTILIZER, INC. CITY OF I'BIECUI. A VI:)UCI~CHECK PEGlITER FOR ALL PERIODS [TEN DESCRIPTION 001536 LTD 001536 LTD 001536 LTD 0015:36 STD 001536 STD 001536 STD 001536 STD 001536 S11) 001536 STD 001536 STD 001536 STD 001536 STD 001536 STD 001536 STD 001536 STD STAFF DEVELOI~4ENT MI(SHP STAFF DEVELOPtENT M(SHP EIELOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAI4 REFUND FOR TCSD CLASS CITYHIDE PCC REPAIR Pt~j~-13 CITY HIDE PCC REPAIR PF~-13 RETENTION H/H INVI 2713 CITYHIDE PCC REPAIR PH~4-13 STEREO EQUIPHENT-SENIOR CENTER TAX 000194 DEF COHP 000194 DEF 000194 DEF CONP 000194 DEF COI4P 000194 DEF COI4P 000194 DEF COI4P 000194 DEF C()!P 000194 DEF CCNP NBRSHP DUES FOR YATES 2/95-96 CONF:TURN TIDES OF FItAUD&/5 REFUND FOR TCSD CLASS SALES TAX ASSISTANCE OLD TONI SPECIFIC PLAN EIR TCSD MISt LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES HISC HAINT SUPPLIES FOR I~f ACCOtJNT 191-2500 192-2500. 1~3-2500 280-2500. 300-2500. 320-2500 g0-2500 001-162-;-5Z50 001-162-~)9-5250 001-150-;-5248 1~)-183-&~BD 100-16~-601-5~02 100-164-601-5402 100-2035 100-164-601-5~02 1~0-181-~-5301 1~0-181-~-5301 001-2080 100-2080 1~0-2080 191-2080 192-2080 lf3-2080 280-2080 3~0-2080 001-150-~9-5226 001-1/0-~-5261 190-183-4~2 001-2030 100-t6~-603-5250 1~0-180-9~-5242 100-164-601-5218 ITEN MIOUIIT 13.89 5.17 14.87 1,321.02 271,15 12.29 297.92 9.87 11.Z6 35.08 6.91 30.28 11.26 150.O0 300.00 328,25 3.00 52,307.85 8,64~.87 6,0~5.28- 3,414.0~' 418.00 32.40 1,248.81 230.65 571.55 65.51 ?5.00 80.06 43.01 22.50 213.00 45.00 40,00 32,5/,3.01 44.38 11.85 6.8~ P~AE N4OIJNT 3,919.89 51 ,U3.35 450.~0 2,337.09 213.00 45.00 32,5/,3.01 CHECE: mlIBER 22638 22639 2264.0 2264.1 22641 226/,2 226~2 22643 22643 22644 226~5 226~6 22646 22646 22646 22646 22~6 226~6 22646 226~6 226~6 226~6 226~6 226~6 226~6 226~6 226~6 226~6 226~6 2264~ 226~7 226~7 22~7 22.~7 15:08 ~E~ D~E ~/~/95 ~/~/~ ~/~1~ ~1~/~ ~/~/~ ~/09/95 0]/09/95 03/09/95 03/09/95 0~/09/95 03/09/95 03/09/95 03/09/95 03/09/95 03/09/95 03/09/~ 03/09/95 03/09/95 03/09/95 03/09/95 03/09/95 03/09/95 03/09/95 0]/09/95 03/09/95 03/09/95 03/09/95 03/09/95 03/09/95 03/09/95 VENDOR lIMBER QOQ209 001513 Q00883 000883 QOIQ07 QOIOQ7 001007 Q0139~ 001394 001676 0002A6 000246 000246 0002/~, 000246 000246 000246 000246 0002~ O002~& 000246 0002~6 000246 0002/,6 0002/,6 000246 0002~6 0002/,6 000246 00024~ 00024,6 000246 000246 000245 0002/,5 000245 000245 0002/,5 NAME L & N FERTILIZER, INC. LIBERTY AUTO CENTER MANNING ENGINEERING MONTELEONE EXCAVATING MONTELEONE EXCAVATING NPG~P. NPG ~P. NPG~P. NATIONAL SANITARY SUPPL NATIONAL SANITARY SUPPL NEXTEL CCIIIIICATIONS, OLSTEN STAFFING SERVICE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PENS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PENS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PENS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PENS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PENS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PENS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PENS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PENS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PER$ (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (E!ePLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PIlE PERS (HEALTH INSUlt. PRE PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE CITY OF TBIECULA VOUCHER/CIECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERICI)S ITEM DESCEIPTION NISC. MAINT SUPPLIES TCSD VEHICLE NAIliT. REVISED DESIGN FOR LINTEL DRgY CLEAN-UP STREET DEBRIS CLEAN-UP STREET DEBRIS ASPHALT PATCH UORK-VARIOUS ASPHALT PATCH UORK-VAR!OUS ASPHALT PATCH UORK-PALA leD. CEC BUILDING NAINT SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES a C.R.C. HARCH 95 leOBILE SERVICE TEMP HELP VIE 2112 GRAGE 0002/,6 PER RIDE 0002/,6 PERS RET 000246 PERS RET 0002~6 PERS RET 0002~6 PIES RET 0002/,6 PERS RET 0002~6 PERS RET 000246 PENS MET 0002~ PERS RET ~2~ PERS RET ~02~ ~RS SET 0~2~ PERS ET ~02~ PERS ffi 0002~ ~Vl~ ~02~ ~Vl~ 0002~ ~VI~ 0002~ ~Vl~ ~02~ ~I~ ~2~ IVl~ ~2~ MVI~ ~2~ MVI~ ~ MVI~ ~Vi~ MVI ~ ~2~5 ~T~ ~ ~2~5 12~5 HiLT~T ~2~5 ~LTNMB 0002~5 ELT~ET 100-16&-601-5218 190-180-999-521~ 210-190-136-5802 001 - 166-999-5~02 001-166-999-5/,02 001-1~-~-5402 001 - 1~,-999-.%02 001-1(i-99~-54.02 190-182-999-5212 1~0-182-99~-5212 320-199-999-5209 001-162-999-5118 001.~2130 001-2390 loo-239b 165-2390 191-2390 192-2390 280-2390 3 O0 - 23~0 320-2390 330 - 239O 340-239O 100-2390 165-2390 191-2390 300-23~0 320-2390 330-2390; 340-239O .~ 001-2090 001 165-21)90 ITEM AllOtIT 15.88 21.03 100.00 2,032.00 1,626.00 1,350.00 1,350.00 1,350.00 .32 51 f84.00 ,t~8.00 6.~ 12,~5.30 2,3~.~ 1~.~ ~.91 319.45 61.17 37.~ 268.21 301.~ 11.15 .37 13.~ 1.~ .19 .23 2.~ 18.70 20.45 2T/'.83 13.&6 7.81 CHECK NlOUlrr 21 100.00 3,658.00 4,QSQ.QQ 18,897.3/, 15:08 VOIJCHER/ CHECX CHECl: VEIl)OR lIE DATE IIIER NANE CITY OF TENECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEH DESCRIPTION PERS (HEALTH IND. IRE QQ0265 PERS (HEALTH IND. PIlE 000265 PERS (HEALTH IND. Pile 000265 PERS (HEALTH IND. PRE 000265 PERS (HEALTH IND. PRE 000265 PERS (HEALTH IND. IRE 080265 PERS (HEALTH INSIJR. IRE 000265 PERS (HEALTH IND. IRE 008265 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. Pile 000265 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000265 PERS (HEALTH '~NSUR. IRE 000265 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. Pile 000265 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000265 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000265 PERS (HEALTH ]NSUR. PRE 000265 PERS (HEALTH ]NSUR. PRE 000265 PERS (HEALTH ]NSUR. Pile 000265 PERS (HEALTH ]NSUR. PRE 000265 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000265 PERS (HEALTH INSIJR. PRE 000265 PERS (HEALTH |NSUR. PRE 000265 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000265 PERS (HEALTH ZNSUR. IRE 000265 PERS (HEALTH [NSUR. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. IRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. Pile 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000265 PERS (HEALTH INSIJR. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INStill. IRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSLIP,. IRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH ]NSUR. IRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUP,. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH IND. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH IND. PRE 0002/*5 PERS (HEALTH [NSUR. PRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. IRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. IRE 0002/*5 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. IRE 0002/*5 PERS (HEALTH INStJR. IRE 000265 PERS (HEALTH IND. IRE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 0002/*5 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. IRE 000265 PERS (HEALTH ]NSLIR. IRE HELTHIIET HELTIINET KAISERSO KAISERSO KAISERSO PACIFICR PACI FICR PC PEltS ClIO " PERS REV TAKE(ARE TICARE TICARE AETEA SO AETNA SO BLSHIELD C[GNA CtGNA CIGNA CIGNA HELTHllET HELTHNET HELTHNET HELTNNET HELTHllET HELTHNET HELTHNET HELTHNET KAISERSO KAISERSO KA [ SERSO PAC[FiCR PACZFZCR PACZFZCR PAC[FZCR PC PERS CHO PERS CHO PERS Clio PERS DED PERS -AD!4 TAKE(ARE TAi~CARE TICARE TAKE(ARE ENPLOYEES ON DISABILITY PORTIO 226~8 0)109195 0802~8 PETRF,.ANE FUEL EXPENSE ~ 03109195 0002~8 PETROLANE FUEL EXPENSE ~03/09/95 000268 PETROLANE FUEL EXPENSE ACCOUNT Nt148ER lf0-20~) )40-20~) 001-20~0. 1~0-20f0 :~0-20~Q 0ol -2~ 100-2~ 001-21 001-2~ 001-2~ ~1-21 1~-~ ~-21 ~1-2~ 100-2~ 0ol -2~ 1~-21 1~-2~ 3~-2~ 001-21 1~-2~ 1~5-21 1~-2~ 1~1-Z~ 1~-2~ S)o-2~ ~o-2WO ool -2~ loo-2~ 1~-2~ ~0-2~ 001 -~ 100-2~ 1~-2~ 1~2-2~0 ool -2~o 001-2~ 1~-2~ 2~-21 1~-~ ~-21 ~o-21 ~1-11~ 001 - I~.JF~- 526) 1fO-180-f~-526) 001-1~..;~-5253 'i, mT 55.18 8.10 5.92 17.87 3.15 35.26 23.32 121.26 7'20.51 - 7.97 ?'21.78 39.81 626.21 857.39 176.06 :306.20 1,0~7.0) 158.05 1,762.~0 143.53 159./,8 606.55 612.12 513.20 61.36 1,032.38 3~.73 733 512.76 I 11.05 6.97 720.51 107.59 1,597.29 832.~2 76.80 163.03 397.00 PAGE7 CSECI( ANOUIIT 21,1~.86 VOUCHRE2 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUI4BER Z2669 ~2669 ~&69 22669 ~2&69 22669 Z2669 ~2669 22669 22650 22650 22651 22652 22652 22652 22652 22652 22652 22652 22652 22652 22652 22652 22652 22652 22653 22656 22655 22656 22657 22658 22659 22659 22659 22659 22659 22659 22659 22659 15:08 CHECK DATE 0~109195 03109195 03109195 03/09/95 03109195 03109195 03109195 03109195 03/09/95 03~09/95 03/09/95 03/09/95 03109195 03/09/95 03109/95 03109/95 03109/95 03109195 03109195 03109195 03109195 03109195 03109195 03109195 03109195 03/0~95 VEIX3R MR 000269 000269 000269 000249 000269 000249 000249 000269 000269 000269 000516 001537 001537 001537 001537 001537 001537 001537 001537 001537 001537 001537 001537 001537 000255 001616 001616 0005~6 00087V 000~2 OOO728 000262 000262 000262 000262 000262 000262 000262 000262 VENOOR PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PHOTOMORKS PHOTO MORKS PRENTICE HALL, INC. PRINCIPAL NUTUAL, PRINCIPAL NUTUAL, INC. PRINCIPAL HUTUAL, INC. PRINCIPAL MUTUAL, INC. PRINCIPAL NtJTUAL, INC. PRINCIPAL HUTUAL, INC. PRINCIPAL NUTUAL, INC. PRINCIPAL HUTUAL, INC. PRINCIPAL HUTUAL, INC. PRINCIPAL NUTUAL, INC. PRINCIPAL HUTUAL, INC. PRINCIPAL liJTUAL, INC. PRINCIPAL NUTUAL, INC. PRO LOCK & KEY QUICK CRETE PRODUCTS, l QUICK CRETE PRCOUCTS, I RADIO SHACK RADISSON HOTEL - VISALI RAMONA TIRE, INC. RAMSEY RACKFLOg & PLUII PANClIO CALIFORNIA liTER RANCHO CALIFORNIA liTER RANClIO CALIFORNIA liTER RANCNO CALIFORNIA liTER RANClIO CALIFORNIA liTER ItAliCNO CALIFORNIA liTER RANCNO CALIFORNIA liTER RANCliO CALIFORNIA liTER CITY OF TEMECIJLA VDUCIER/CHECK SISTER RXt ALL PEItla)S ITEM DESCRIPTION PETTY CASH liEIll. PETTY CASH liEIll. PETTY CASH liEIll. PETTY CASH RElll. PETTY CASH IElll. PETTY CASH liEIll. PETTY CASH RElll. PETTY CASH RElll, PETTY CASH RElll. PETTY CASH RElll, FIU!, SLIDES, & PICTURES FILH, SLIDES, & PICTURES BOOK:LIFETINE CfiI4. GUIDE 001537 DENT ADV OO1537 DENTALM4 001537 DENTALPN 0015)7 DENTALPN 001537 DENTALPI! 00153? DENTALPN 001537 DENYALP. 001537 DENTALP. 00153? DENTALP. 00153? DENTALP. 00153? DENTALP. 00153? DENYALP. OVERSTATED CQeRA TCED LOCKSMITH SERVICES 2 GRAY STEEL ASH LID-T TAX MISC COI41~JTER SUPPLIES CONF:SIERRA ALVAREZ HOTEL ROOM TIRE FOR Pg POOL TRUCK RACKFLOg ANMUAL TEST & REPAIR 01-06-8,L~00-1 01/16-02/15/95 01-08-18505-2 1/17-2/21/95 liTER SERVICE 1/12-2/15/95 liTER SERVICE 1/12-2/15/95 liTER SERVICE 1/12-2/15/95 liTER SERVICE 1/12-2/15/~5 liTER SERVICE 1/12-2/15/95 liTER SERVICE 1112-2/15/95 ACCI/IIT NUMBER 190-181-999-5~01 001-100-999-5220 001 - 160-999-5220 NO1-163-999-5261 001-161-999-5220 001-160-999-5258 001-161-999-5258 001-100-999-5260 -' 001-165-999-5220 100-16~-601-5258 001-110,~-5250 001-110-~-5250 :, 100-180.~-5228 001-1180 001-2~,0 100-2360 165-~0 191 -~0 1~-~0 16-~0 ~00-~0 ~0-~0 ~0-~0 ~1-11~ 190-180-~-5212 100-180-~-5262 1~)-180-9q~-52~2 320-1W-~-5221 001 - 162;999- 5258 100-1~,;.601-5262 1~0-180.~-5212 100-16&-601-5260 190-180-999-5260 100-180-999-5260 190-181-999-5260 1~0-182-9f~-5260 191-180-~-5260 193-180-~-5260 360-1~-~-5260 ITEM ANOUNT 86.86 11.86 32.75 30.67 8.76 18.4~ 6.76 30.00 16.00 55.00 12.f3 f~.13 60.85 122.,~ 1,181.86 312.58 17.16 197.69 7.32 42,913 8.~ 8.58 10.72 16.26 69.33 10.00- 22.$6 590.00 65.73 17.5A 231.00 51.70 602.00 12.69 35.19 551.21 8~.21 352.~6 110.73 387.16 10.60 CHECK N4OUNT 112.06 60.85 635.73 17.5/, 2:51.00 51.70 602.00  CITY OF TBIECULA : 15:08 ~CHEC3C lEilSlil VOUCHER/ ~ ~' CHECK CHECK VEN~ VEIl)OR ITEN ACI~XJNT \ NUIIER DATE NUNBER NANE DESCRIPTION NUNSER PAGE9 22660 03/09/95 000/,26 ItAliCIN) INDUSTRIAL SUPPL C-FOLD TMLS FOR SR CNTR 190-181-999-5212 22661 03109195 001046 REXOIl, FREEDNAN, XLEPET HLI4AN RESOURCES LEGAL SERVICES 001-130-999-5267 675.35 675.35 22662 03/09/95 000266 RIG~TMAY PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL I YARD 100-164-601-5238 57.39 57.39 22663 03/09/95 000353 RIVERS[DE CO. AUDITOR 22663 03/09/95 000353 RIVERSIDE CO: AUDITOR FEB 95 COUNTY PRICING ASSESSHEN 001-2265 FEB 95 COUNTY PRICING ASSESSMEN 881-2260 50.00 210.00 260.00 22664 03/09/95 000678 RIVERSIDE IX:). HEALTH SE HEALTH ~RNIT FOR POOL 190-180-999-5250 210.00 -. 210.00 22665 03109195 00070~ S K S, INC/INUIJI) OIL CITY VEHICLES FUEL EXPENSE 100-164-601-5263 22665 03109195 Q00704 S K S, IMC/INLAND OIL CITY VEHICLES FUEL EXPENSE 100-164-60G-5263 22665 03109195 000 70~ S K S, INC/INLNI) OIL CITY VEHICLES FUEL EXPENSE 001-163-999-5263 22665 03/09/95 OQO?C)4 S K S, INC/INLAND OIL CITY VEHICLES FUEL EXPENSE 001-165-999-52e3 22665 03/09/95 000?04 S K S, INC/INLAND OIL CITY VEHICLES FUEL EXPENSE 190-180-999-5263 22665 03/09/95 000?04 S K S, INC/INLAND OIL CITY VEHICLES FUEL EXPENSE 881-162-999-5263 178./d) 26.56 77.82 57.10 169.57 50.2O 557.65 22666 03/88/95 001889 SHAFER, ALICIA TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 19O'183-999-5330 2,~.6A7 03/0~/95 001888 SHAFER, A!4BER TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS . 03/09/95 000~3~ SIERRA CX3HPUTER SYSTEMS CORF:SIEREA ~OFTgARE:T.ALVAREZ 001-162~99~-5258 403.20 603.20 175.00 22669 03/09/95 000751 SKILLPATH, INC. SENINAR: BUSINESS liRITING:BERG 001-162-999-5261 1~9.00 169.00 ' 22670 03/88/95 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON - 2-00-397-50~2 CITY HALL ELECT 3~0-199-9(~-5260 22670 03/09/95 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON - 2-00-397-5026 ELECT. SERVICES 191-180-999-5319 22670 03/09/95 000537 SOIJTHERN CALIF EDISON - 2-00-397-5059 ELECT SERVICE 19O-180-9O9-5260 22670 03/09/95 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON - 2-00-397-5067 ELECT SERVICE 193-180-999-5260 22670 O3/O9/95 OO053? SOUTHERN CALIF EDISOR - 66-77-795-8082-01 1/25-2/25/95 19O-181-9O9-5260 2,733.80 3,868.37 1,675.63 460.36 630.61 9,1/k8.37 22671 03/0~/95 000296 22671 03188195 000296 22671 03/09195 0002~6 22671 03/0~/95 0002~ 22671 03/09/95 000296 22671 03/88/95 000296 22671 03/09/95 000296 22671 03/09/95 000296 22671 03/88/95 000294 22671 03/09/95 00029~ 22671 03/09/95 00029~ 22671 03109195 00029~ .22672 03109195 001753 22675 ~1~195 001567 22675 ~/~/95 001567 ~ 03109195 001567 ~1~!95 001547 STATE FUND - SAN FILANCi STATE FUND - SAN FRANCI STATE FUND - SAN FRANCI STATE FtJtG) - SAN FRANCI STATE FUI¢ - SAN FRANCI STATE FIJND - SAN FRANCI STATE FUND - SAIl FItANCI STATE FUND - SAN FRAIICI STATE FUND - ~ FIMIIC] STATE FUND - SAN FRANCI STATE FUND - SAN FRANCI STATE FUND - SAN FRANCI TAVAGLIORE, NICHOLAS F. TEN, ISTERS LOCAL 911 TEMISTERS LOCAL 911 TENGTERS LOCAL 911 TEN4STERS LOCAL 911 FEB 95 ll)RKERS' CORP PHT FEB 95 gOelCERS' COf4P ~ FEB 95 VORKERS' COI4P PHT FEB 95 ll)NCERS' COI4P PHT FEB 95 MORKERS' CONP PtlT FED95 MORKERS' COf4P P~ FEB 95 MORKERS' CONP PI4T FEB95 gOIUCERS' CCle PHT FED95 UOIUCERS' CCllP Plrr FEB 95 I,IORICERS' CONP Pf4T FEB95 tIIICERS' I:a4P FI4T FEB 95 IIORICERS' CONP PHT SALES TAX ASSISTANCE 001547 UN DUES 0015/,7 UN DUES 001567 UN DUES 001567 UN DUES 300-23/0 320-Z370 3:30-Z370 360-Z370' 001-2030 001-2125 100-2125 165-2125 190-2125 4,244.32 1,916.06 52.46 1,783.09 101.03 9.05 143.64 27.19 22.03 25.81 2.44) 802.80 438.61 76.77 7.60 85.10 8,673.76. 8O2.8O VOUCHER/ CHECk: NLI4BER 2267~, 22675 22676 22676 22676 22676 22677 22678 22678 22678 22679 22679 22679 22679 22679 22679 22680 22680 22680 22~1 Z2~1 22~1 22~1 22682 22682 22682 22682 22682 22684 22685 22687 15:08 CHECK DATE 03109195 0310919S 03/O9/95 03109195 03109195 03/09/95 03109195 03109195 03/09/95 03/09/95 03/09/95 03109195 03109195 03109195 03109/95 03/09/95 03/09/95 03109195 03109195 03/09/95 03109195 03/09/95 VENDOR NLI4BER OO15~,7 OO15~7 00154? OO1219 000306 000~2 00064,2 000~2 000~2 001~87 000320 000320 000320 0010~5 001065 001065 001065 001065 001065 000389 00038~ 00038~ 000325 000325 000325 000325 000326 000326 000326 000326 080326 001885 001884 M CITY OF TENEClJLA VOUClIBt/CIICK REGISTEll FOR ALL PERIORS ITEN DESCRIPTIOR TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 tIN DUES TENISTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES TEANSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 tIN DUES TEANSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 ON DUES TEHE(:ULA VALLEY LASER R TEHECULA VALLEY PIPE & TEHECULA, CITY OF - FLE TENECULA, CITY OF ' FLE TENECULA, CITY OF ' FLE TEECUL~, CITY OF ' FLE TIERRA HECHANICAL, INC. TOWNE CENTER STATIClEAS TOI, INE CENTER STATIONERS TOMNE CENTER STATIONERS U S C N/PEBSCO (DEF. C U S C N/PEBSCO (DEF. C U S C N IPEBSCO (DEF. C U S C N/PEBSCO (DEF. C U S C N/PENSCO (DEF. C U S C N/PEBSCO (DEF. C u s c N/PEBSCO U S C N/PEBSCO (OBRA) U S C N/PEBSCO (OeRA) UNITED MAY OF THE INLAN UNITED WAY OF THE INLAN UNITED ilkY OF THE INLAN UNITED WAY OF THE INLAN UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE, UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE, UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE, UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE, UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE, VAULT INC., THE VOTE YES ON B SPONSORED WASHBURN, LELAND WNITMARSH, ANLENE glLSON, PAT C. HP LASERJET SERVICE/REPAIR NAINT SUPPLIES FOR TCSD FACILI FLEXIBLE SEEFIT NEIN8. FLEXIBLE NEEFIT NEINB. FLEXIBLE SESEFIT Ell. FLEXIBLE NEEFIT REIli. HEAT/AIR $YSTB4 IMINTi SR CTR OFFICE SUPPLIES - ~ PROJECTS OFFICE SUPPLIES INN N4IN OFFICE SUPPLIES LAll) DEVEL 001065 DEF Cg4P 0010~5 DEF CCl4P 001065 DEF CONP 001065 DEF CCl4P 001065 DEF 001065 DEF COHP 000389 PT RETIR 000~89 PT RETIR 000389 PT RETIR 000325 UU 000325 IN 000325 IN 000325 IN ONIFORMSNAINT FOR IN UNIFORN KAINT FOR TCSl) PERSONN FLO0~ 14ATS HAINT a CITY HALL FLOOR NATS RENTAL 0 C.R.C. FLOOR NATS RENTAL 8 SE ONTR RUSH COURIER W/I 6 ROURS SECURITY DEPOSIT REFUNDCC.R.C) SALES TAX ASSISTANCE REFUND FOR TCID CLASS SALES TAX ASSISTANCE ACI3XMT ~R lrl -2125 193-2125 3OO-2125 320-2125 320-199:.999-5215 .~- 190-180'~999'5212 001'1020 190'1020 100'1020 3OO-1020 190-181-~-5212 001-165-~-5220 100-164-604-5220 OOl-16S-gW-5220 001-2080 100-2080 190-2080 300-2080 320-2080 340-2080 O01-2160 100-2160 1~0-2160 001-2120 100-2120' 190-2120 280-2120 100-164-601-5243 1~)-180-;-522,3 3~0-1 ~-~- 5250 190-182-;-5250 190-181-~-5250 001-120-999-5250 001-2030 001-2030 ITEM ANOUMT 4.62 18.50 131.56 36.4~ 3,145.19 321 30.25 12.49 91.8A ~.77 84.34 1,87'7.31 132.2] 271 4.99 312.50 50.00 216.24 67.30 236.40 59.37 17.00 .60 29.16 16.85 54.50 66.&4 16.75 loo.OO 200,78 200.70 CECK ANIXlIT 666.OO 131.56 ~6.44 3,509 · 87 89.00 275.95 2,64.8.52 519.9A 4,0.OO 3 15:08 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VEIl)OR NUI4BER DATE ~ER 22688 0~109195 2~689 0~109195 000347 VENDOR M XEROX COItPORATIC)N BILLI ZEE SERVICE CO CITY OF TBIECUI. A VCNJCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERICOS ITEM DESCRIPTIQli NETERUSAGE FOR FEB95 FIRST AID SUPPLIES a CITY IL4LL ACCOUNT IIIIBER ~]0-199-999- 5239 3~0-199-999.-5242 ITEM AMOUNT 1,017.~ ~.~ PA~E 11 CHECK AIIOUNT 1,017.98 65.03 TOTAL CHECKS 217,406.81 VQtJCHREZ 03/16/95 1A:?.6 CiTY OF TBeCULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOIl ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 100 GAS TAX FUND 165 RDA DEV- LOU/140D GET ASIDE 190 CORNUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 191 TC$1) SERVICE LEVEL A 19~ TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEHENT PROJ FUND 280 REDEVELOPHENT AGENCY - CIP 300 [NSIJP, JkNCE FUND [IIFORHATION SYSTEMS 330 SUPPORT SERVICES .TOTAL /k8,199.27 /,0,977.63 1,000.00 12,413.62 116.88 1,933.19 5Z3.gA 50.00 230,00 2,665 /,39.41 108,549.41 BARE POSTRASTER RIVERSIDE CO. DEPT. OF H]LLCE~ CONTRACTING, HILLCREST CONTRACTING, A & N SIONS A N BEST CClIPANY, INC. AT&T-VAN BUYS AT&T'VAN BUYS A T & T -VANNUYS AIRTOUCH CELLULAR CORP. APPLE ONE, INC. ASC~ HASLER RAILING SY BEIJING LONGEVITY, INC. VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR NUHBER DATE NIJI4BER 22..~0 03/0~/g5 000253 22~91 03/0~/~5 O013~5 226~2 03/14/~5 o016r~, 22692 03/14/95 0016~ 22696 03/16/95 22697 03/16/95 001523 22698 03/16/95 001895 22698 03/16/95 001895 22698 03/16/95 001895 22699 03/16/95 001425 22700 03/16/95 000101 22701 03/16/95 0o0195 ~ 03/16/95 001876 22703 03/16/95 000679 22703 03/16/95 000679 2270z, 03/16/95 000702 22705 03/16/95 000128 22706 03/16/95 001054 22707 03/16/95 000790 22?08 03/16/95 000152 22709 03/16/95 000950 C11~ OF TENECULA VOUCHEll/CHECK It~ISTER Flit ALL latltll31~ ITEN DESCRIPTION RASS RAIL OF DEVEL. CCI)E SEPTIC SYSTE!I PLAN CK-FIRE STA PROGRESS PNT FOR JAN 95 RETENTION V/H ON INVt 2713 REFUND OVRPNT ON NSF CK PROPERTY/CASUALTY RATING GUIDE 730 373 7109 001 LONG DIST SER 730 373 7992 001 LONG DIST SER 730 373 8000 01 LONG DIST SER LA 601520230195 TH TENP HELP V/E 2/18 GUTTOR POSTAGE NETER RENTAL TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS BOGRAPHICS PRINTING PLU BUSINESS CARDS-GINNY RUND BOGRAPHIC$ PRINTING PLU TAX CADDY GRAPHICS CAL'SURANCE ASSOCIATES, CALIFORNIA GUILDING OFF CALIFORNIA DEPT OF PEST CALIFORNIA PARKS & RECR CALIFORNIAN, INC.- DISP 22710 03/16/95 001270 CITY-VIDE ELECTRORIC SY 22711 03/16/95 00(X89 CONB ORGUP, THE 22712 03/16/95 001535 CREEKSIDE TEXACO, INC. 22713 03/16/95 001233 DAN'S FEED & SEED, INC. 22714 ~3/16/95 001029 DATAgJICK, INC. 22715 03/16/95 oo0155 DAVLIN 03/16/95 001673 DIVERSIFIED TENPORARY S EASTER BROCHUER TYPEGRAPHY ACCOUNT 001-161-999-5230 o01-171-999-5~70 lo0-16~-601-5402 100 - 2035 001-2640 001-140-999-5228 320-199-999-5208 320 - 199 - 999 - 5208 320-199-999-5208 :520-199-999-5208 330-199-999-5118 330-199-999-5239 190-183-999-5330 190-180-999-5220 190-180-999-5220 190-18~-999-5370 INSURANCE FOR ICAMASAKI NOTORCY 300-199-~-5201 FUB:CA NON-RESID DISABLE ACRES LICENSE RENEMAL-LATE PENALTY PUB:BENEFITS-BASED APPRCACH CORSTRUCTION-UPDATE ADVERTSHNT SR CNTR ANNUAL FIRE ALARM INSP INSIDE NETMARE SUBSCRIPTIOR VEHICLE RAINT. PUB.VORKS PROPANE GAS FOR FIELD TANKS FEB ACCESS SERVICE PLANNING CDNN AUDIO TAPE 3/6 TENP HELP VIE 3/5 FRITCHEY 100-16~-604-5228 190-180-999-5226 190-180-999-5228 001-165-999-5254 190-181-999-5230 $20-199-999-5228 lo0-164-601-5214 100-164-601-5218 320-199-999-5250 o01-16~-9;J)9-5250 001-161-999-5118 ITBI ANOUNT 2,1o0.o0 246.o0 /,4,663.65 4,466.39- 5.o0 95.o0 .26 .41 .13 65.81 153,51 124.00 31.88 2.47 110.o0 230.00 49.50 10.o0 28,00 66.20 62.50 56./,5 15.19 85.24 153.34 361.20 PAGE CHE~ ANOUNT 2,1~,o0 2~.o0 40,'1~.~ 5.00 95.o0 65.81 153.51 23~.~ 1~.00 ~.35 110,00 49.50 10.~ 62.50 56.&5 15.19 85.~ 153.~ ~1.20 VOUCHRE2 03/16/95 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 22717 22718 22719 22720 22721 22722 22722 22723 22724 22724 2272/* 22724 2272/* 22725 22725 22725 22725 22727 22728 2272~ 22730 22731 22732 22733 22733 22733. 2273/, 22735 1/*:26 CHECK DATE 03/16/95 03/16/95 03/16/95 03/16/95 03/16/95 o3/16/95 o3/16/95 03/16/95 03/16/95 03/16/95 03/16/95 03/16/95 03/16/95 03/16/95 03/16/95 03116195 03/16/95 03/16/95 03116195 03/16/95 03/16/95 o3/16/95 03/16/95 03/16/95 03/16/95 03/16/95 03/16/95 03/16/95 03116195 03/16/95 03/16/95 03/16/95 VENI)OIt le. IIBER 0014.82 Q01722 0Q0165 00018~ 000184 00018/:. 001355 00017'7 Q00177 000177' 000177 000177 000178 000178 000178 000178 001186 000203 000206 000206 000206 000206 001329 00020~ VENDGR M DUNBAR-fiN CORPOeAT!Oti ED~RI)S, SALLY FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. FIELDS, DARILYN FURGIUELE, VIVIAN G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYH G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM G T E CALIFORNIA, INC. GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT GLENNXE$ OFFICE PRODUCT GLENNXES OFFICE PRODUCT GLENNZES OFFICE PROOUCT GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT GLENN[ES OFFICE PRODUCT GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO GOLDEH STATE TRADING CO HAHXLTON, LINDA HANSON, SCOTT HART, KATHERINE HOUSE OF FABRICS INTERNATIONAL ASSOC. OF IRVIN, JOHN JOgS AVAILABLE, INC. KINKO'S OF RIVERSIDE, KINKO'S OF RIVERSIDE, KINKO'S OF RIVERSIDE, KINKO~S OF RIVERSIDE, KOHLItOAS, JEANETTE L & H FERTILIZER, INC. CITY OF TB~IXJLA VOUCNEP./CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL ITcRIGOS ITEM DESCRIPTION REPAIRPOLICE SIREN TCSi) INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS EXPRESS NAIL SERVICE REFUND FOR TC$1) CLASS REFUND FOR TCSD CLASS 909 69~-6~00 tin 9o9 695-3539 GEN 909 699-2309 GIN 140NTHY ACCESS CHARGES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES HISC OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES TCSD · THERBOARD DX2-66 OK IDE HARD DR[VE FREIGHT TAX REFUND FOR TCSD CLASS REFUND FOR OVRP~T PRK CITATION REFUli) FOR TCSD CLASS SUPPLIES FOR CRAFT CLASS PUB:NAT ELECT CODE FOR PW TCSD INSTRUCTON EARNINGS REClIUIT FOR SIt MGliT ANALYST STATIONERY CARDSTOCK CLEAR COVER SHEETS STATIONARY CARDSTOCK COLON TRANSPARENCIES TCSO INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS HISC. SUPPLIES/EQUiP. ACCOUNT HUMBER 001-170-999-5250 190-183-999-5330 320-199-999-5230 190-183-/,980 :*:~:.~:. 190-183-&f82 *r* 320-199-999-5Z08 320-199-~-5208 320-199-999-5208 320- 001-170J~9-5220 001 - 161-99~-5220 001 - 161-999-5220 001-1/*0-999-5220 001 - 161-999-5220 1~0-180--999-5220 320-19~-999-5221 320-199-~-5221 320-199-999-5221 320-199-~9~-5221 199-183-/.982 001-170~/*055 190-183-/*~82 1~0-183-999-5320 100-16/*-60~-5228 190-183-~-5330 001-150-99~-5254. 330-199-W9-5220 330-199-999-5220 001-161-999-5222 001 - 161 -~-5222 199-103-999-5330 100-1~4-601-5218 ITBI NI)UNT 89.05 22.10 37.00 20.00 52/,. 15 33.71 350.00 15.51 261.65 32.26 23.52 163.10 35.76 580.00 220.00 12,00 62.00 50.00 15.00 50,00 55.15 785 21 29.31 7.28 8.21 672.00 CHECK :89.05 ~4.DD 22.10 37.Q0 20.00 591.60 350.0o 36.00 50.00 15.00 50.QO 55.15 /05.60 72.00 66.6/, 672. O0  CITY OF TBIECULA 14:z6 vanwc cK us.Tn -;' ;!- FoR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOft ITEM ACCOUNT RUMBER DATE NtJMBER MAME DESCRIPTION IKleER ITEM aT Pm3 CNECK ANQUNT 22736 0)/16/~5 001607 L D D S aMIIIICATIOIdS, FEB LONG DIST SERVla: 320-199-~9-5208 58.80 22737 03/16/95 0015~ LA MASTERS OF FIlE TRAV COMF:YR OF THE FNIILY:LINDEIMN 0O1-100-999-5258 21&.DO 22738 03/16/95 000596 LEAGUE OF CAL. CITIES CORF:ECOROMIC DEVEL;S.NELSON 190-180-999-5258 22739 03/16/95 000669 LEAGUE OF CAL. CITIES COMF:CI311JNITY SERVICES 4/5-7 190-180-999-5258 205.0O 800.00 22740 03/16/95 001199 LEAGUE OF CAL. CITIES 22740 03/16/95 001199 LEAGUE OF CAL. CITIES CONF:PLJkNHERS INSTITUTE 3/22-4 · 001-161-999-5258 COlIF:PLANNERS INSTITUTE 3/22-4 001-161-999-5272 22741 03116195 001513 LIBERTY AUTO CENTER VEHICLES REPAIR & IlliT 001-162-999-5214 255.52 255.52 22742 03/16/95 000653 LUCICY STORE, INC. COOKIE IIOMSTER CLASS StJPPLIES 10O-18~-999-53Z0 22743 03/16/95 001692 M P SIGNS VEHICLE HARKINGS FOR FIRE TRUC 0O1-171-999-5214 30.0O 415.0O 30.OO 415.0O 227/4 03/16/95 001142 HARKHN4 & ASSOCIATES PItOF. SERVICES FEB. 1995 10O-16~-603-5268 -. 22745 03/16/95 000219 MARTIN 1-HOUR PHOTO PHOTO DEVELOPING FOR CIP 0O1:165-999-5250 .~ 03/16/95 000219 MARTIN 1-HOUR PHOTO PHOTO DEVELOPING FOR P,W, 100~T64-601-5250 ' 03/16/95 000219 HARTIN 1-HOUR PHOTO PHOTO DEVELOPING; P,M. 001-163-999-5250 227~6 03/16/95 000883 HONTELEORE EXCAVATING EMERGENCY tJORK DUE TO RAINS 001-166-099-5401 227~6 03/16/95 000883 NONTELEONE EXCAVATING EMERGENCY t4ORK DUE TO RAINS OO1-166-.'q;x)9-5601 22746 03/16/95 000883 MONTELEORE EXCAVATING EHERSENCY 1,40eK DUE TO RAINS 001-166:'-x~-5602 22746 03/16/95 000883 M(NITELEORE EXCAVATING EMERGENCY MORK DUE TO RAINS 001-166-999-5/,01 227~6 03/16/95 000883 HONTELEONE EXCAVATING EMERGENCY iICIK DUE TO RAINS 0O1-166-999-.%01 22766 03/16/95 000883 MGNTELEONE EXCAVATING EMERGENCY WORK DUE TO RAINS 001-166-999-5401 · 57.45 27.~ 10.~ 3,336.49 4,3?0.00 1,964.55 10,660.0O 11,732.0O 7,356.60 57.45 39,419.~ 22747 03/16/95 000775 HUNIHETRIX STSTBIS CORP ANNUAL HAINT Cl ~ASE SYSTEM 22747 03/16/95 000775 HUNIMETRIX SYSTEMS CORP ANNUAL HAINT CI RECORDS fiGHT 320-199-999-5211 320-199-999-5211 300.00 180.00 ~80.00 22748 03/16/95 000?..33 NELSON, SHARON CORF:CA b'"d RECREATION 3/1-4/95 190-180-999-5258 22749 03/16/95 001561 22749 03/16/95 001561 22749 03116195 001561 22749 03/16/95 001561 22749 03/16/95 001561 22749 03/16/95 001561 22749 03/16/95 001561 22749 03/16/95 001561 22750 03116/95 000359 22751 03/16/95 000249 22751 03/16/95 000249 22751 03/16/95 000249 P 03/16/95 000249 03/16/95 000249 PAGENET - PAGING NETM)R PAGENET - PAGING NETt, IOR PAGENET - PAGING NETM)R PAGENET - PAGING NETkIOR PAGENET - PAGING HETkIOR PAGENET - PAGING HEllJOR PAGENET - PAGING NETNOR PAGENET - PAGING NEI'IJ(Nt PARICER, HERMAN PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PAGER SERVICE FOR FEB 95 PAGER SERVICE FOR FEB 95 PAGER SERVICE FOR FEB95 PAGER SERVICE FOR FEB 95 PAGER SERVICE FOR FEB 95 PASER SERVICE FOR FEB 95 PAGER SERVICE FOR FEB95 PAGER SERVICE FOR FEB 95 CONF:CA SV RECEEATIOR 3/1-4/95 PETTY CASH REIMB, PETTY CASH REill. PETTY CASH REIlI. PETTY CASH REIMB, PETTY CASH REIMB. 001-162-gfg-5Z38 190-180-999-5238 190-180-999-5238 001-100-999-5250 001 - 170-999-5242. 001-163-999-5250 100-164-601-5238 001 - 165-999-5Z38 19o-la~-99~-525a · ,. · ,i.,~ oO1-163-999-5262 oO1-162-999-522o 0Ol -166-999-5250 oO1-15o-999-526o 001-1/,0-999-5260 22.50 80.18 22.50 30.0O 15.0O 15 .(X) 7.50 28.76 31.90 19.Q4 50.49 3.00 20.0O VOUClfftE2 03116195 VOUCHER/ CHECK ~R 22752 22753 2?,753 22753 22754 22754 22754 22755 22756 22756 22756 22757 22758 22759 22760 22761 22761 22762 22763 2276~ 22763 22763 22764 22765 22765 22765 22765 22765 22765 22765 22765 22765 22765 14:26 CHECK DATE 03/16/95 03/16/95 03116195 03/16/95 03/16/95 83/16/95 03/16/95 03/16/f5 03/16/95 03/16/95 03/16/95 03/16/95 03/16/95 C)3/16/95 03/16/95 03/16/95 03/16/95 03/16/95 03/16/95 03/16/95 03/16/95 03/16/95 03/16/95 03/16/95 03/16/95 03/16/95 03/16/95 83/16/95 83/16/95 03/16/95 03/16/95 03/16/95 03/16/95 03/16/95 03/16/95 03/16/95 03116195 NUMBER 000249 0002/,9 000249 0O02/,9 000580 000253 0OO253 OO0253 O00Z5~ 000254 000254 000795 000262 000262 000262 001896 001046 000352 000~18 00O678 000678 000/*99 000537 000537 000537 000537 000926 000375 900375 OOO375 OOO375 000375 008375 OOO375 000375 OO0375 OOO375 M PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PHOTOUORKS POSTHASTER POSTRASTER POSTRASTER PRESS'ENTERPRISE COI4PAN PRESS-ENTERPRISE CONPAN PRESS-ENTERPRISE CONPAN PRYOR RESOURCES, INC. RANCHO CALIFORNIA VATER RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER RESOLUTION TRUST CORP. REXON, FREEDffiU/, KLEPET RIVERSIDE C0. ASSESSOR RIVERSIDE CO. CLERK AMD RIVERSIDE CO. HEALTH SE RIVERSIDE IX). HEALTH SE SCCCA SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON - SOUTHERN CALIF BISON - SOUTHERN CALIF BISON - SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON - SOUTHERN CALIF B)ISON - SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPNOIi SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPNON SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPNON SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPItON SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPNON SOUTHERN CAL]F TELEPNON SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPNON CITY OF I'EI~CULA VQUCNERICHECK REGISTEIt FOR ALL PEelCOS ITEN DESCRIPTION PETTY CASH REIMB. PETTY CASH REIII. PETTY CASH REIll. PETTY CASH REIMB. FILM & DEVELOPING EXPRESS RAIL SERVICE EXPRESS RAIL SERVICE EXPRESS RAIL SERVICE RECRUITlENT ADVERTISING RECIKIITtENT ADVERTISING PUBLIC NOTICE AD gKSHP: GRNI4ER/USASE; WIMBERLY WATER SERVICE FOR 1/1-2/Z3/95 MATER SERVICE FOR 1/1-2/23/~5 MATER SERVICE FOR 1/1-2/23/95 RANCHOMEST APARTMENTS PROF. SERVICES FOe FEB 95 RAP COPIES FROH COUNTY APERTURE CARDS DUPLICATES HEALTH PERMIT i RANCHO VISTA HEALTH PERMIT 8 PALONA DEL SOL REDEVIL-CITY CLERK ASSOC-OREEK ELECT SERVICE FOR 1/1-2/23/95 ELECT SERVICE FOR 1/1-2/r1/95 ELECT SERVICE FOR 1/1-2/23/95 ELECT SERVICE FOR 1/1-2/23/95 INSTALL ELECT FACILILIT[ES 909202-4765 BB 909 202-4764 BB 909 202-4769 JS 909 202-420/, KL 909 202-4762 RP 909 202-4758 RR 909 283-407014JM 909 202-4770RB 909 202-~757 JG 909 202-4760 JH ACCCUMT 190-180-9~9-5220 190-181-999-5301 901-120-999-5250 lOO-182;999-5301 901-16~-9~-5260 190-1990 001-120~999-5230 001-161'999'5230 001-150-999-5254 001-150-999'525~ 001 - 161-999-5256 001-161-999-5258 190-180-999-52~0 191-180-999-52/.0 193-180-999-52/,0 165;1652 001-130-999-5247 190-180-999-5220 001-163-999-52Z0 190-182-999-5250 190-18b-Wg-525o ool - 12o,99~- 5258 193-180-9~9-52/*0 190-18Q-999-52/*0 190-182-999-52/*0 191-180-999-5319 210-165-642-580/, 100-164-601-5208 1900-164-901-5290 001-1OO-999-5208 001-100499-5208 001-100-999-5208 001-100-999-5208 001-110-f99-5208 001 - 110-999-5208 001-120-999-5208 100-164-603-5208 1TEN N!OUNT 8.O6 34.40 43.08 102.21 32.64 21.50 30.OO 125.90 83.82 53.2~ 3OO.ll 1,000.00 175.90 10.00 5.00 326.OO 326.OO 25.00 1,624.OO 61.17 7,353.O6 63.64 89.88 102.45 64.97 ~8.79 99.46 75.03 1/*~.24 65 .~8 6~ .35 12L61 CRECK N~OUMT 312.18 "32.64 *. lOO.90 4,~.17 175.00 10o00 5.00 9,102.75 523.9~ VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENI)OIt NLNBER DATE I&NBER 22765 00/16/95 000.375 22765 (13116/95 000375 22765 03/16/95 000375 22765 03/16/95 000375 22765 03/16/95 000375 22765 03116195 000375 22?65 03/16/95 000375 22765 C)3/16/95 000375 22765 03/16/95 000375 22765 03/16/95 000375 22765 03/16/95 000375 22765 03/16/95 000375 22765 03/16/95 000375 22765 03/16/95 000375 22766 03/16/95 000291 22767 03/16/95 22768 03/16/95 001497 ,r- ', 03/16/95 000168 22770 03/16/95 000905 22770 03/16/95 000905 22771 03/16/95 000307 22772 03/16/95 22773 03/16/95 000326 22774 03/16/95 001209 2277A 03/16/95 00120~ 2277~ 03/16/95 001209 22776 03/16/95 00120~ 22776 03/16/95 001209 22774 03/16/95 001209 22775 03/16/95 001637 22776 03/16/95 001890 22777 03/16/95 000339 22778 03/16/95 000~6 22T/~ 03/16/95 VENDOR SOUTHERN CALZF TELEPHON SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON SOUTHERN CALZF TELEPHON SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON SOUTHERN CAL[F TELEPHON SOUTHERN CAL[F TELEPHON SOUTHERN CAL[F TELEPHON $OlJTHERN CAL[F TELEPHON SOUTHERN CALZF TELEPHON SOUTHERN CAL[F TELEPHON SOUTHERN CALZF TELEPHON SPEE DEE OZL CHANGE & T SPORTS TURF NANAGERS AS T R W, INC.-INFORNATION TEMECULA FLOtdER CORRAL TENECULA SHUTTLE SERVIC TENECLILA SHUTTLE SERVIC TENECULA TROPHY CO. TOP TO BOTTON JANITORIA UNZTOG RENTAL SERVICE, VAULT INC., THE VAULT INC., THE VAULT ]NC., THE VAULT ]NC., THE VAULT INC., THE VAULT INC., THE VIRACK, HARYANN VORTEX DOORS gEST PUBLISHING CONPANY gltITEHEAD, RHONDA MHITFIELD, JEFFREY CITY OF TBIECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOg ALL PERIODS ITEN DESCRIPTIOR 909 202-4752 SN 909 202-4756 IOITN CELLULAR TELEPHONE BATTERY CILARGER/CONDITIOgER BATTERY EXTENDED LIFE POgER ADAPTER CORD TAX MOTOROLA CELLULAR PHONE BATTERY CHARGER/CONDITIOgER BATTERY EXTENDED LIFE POMER ADAPTER CORD TAX REPLACENEHT BATTERY - CELLULAR TAX VEHICLE REPAIR & NAINT. HEHBERSHIP FOR K.HARRINGTOR RDA CREDIT REPORTS SERVICE FLOMERS FOR L. RONERO SHUTTLE FOg J.STORE 3/2/95 SHUTTLE FOg J. NIHESCIEH PLA~UE FOR RICK SAYRE CORF:CARPET CLEANING;R.CAMBRID UNIFOgMS HAINT FOg Pg DATA STORAGE CARTRIDGE CTNR NICROIK)X APERTURE CARD BOX LEASED CTNR/INSERT CONTAINER MICROBOX APERTURE CARD BOX TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS REPAIRS TO CEC STEEL FIRE DOOR CALIF. CODE I. Rq)ATES TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS REFUND OF NON-RESIDENT FEE TOTAL CHECKS AC_e~3e__NT litleER 190-180-~-5208 320-1ff-~q~-5208 001-100-~-5208 001-100-999-52Og 001-100-~-5208 001-100-~-5208 001-100-999-5200 001 '001-100-999-5200 0001-10~;~-5200 001 - 100:999-5208 001 - 100-W9-5208 001 - 162-~-5200 001 - 162-999-5208 001-162-~-5216 190-180- ~-5226 280-199-999-5250 001-10C-~-5258 190-180.-999-5258 001-100-9~-5265 -190-180-9~-5261 100-1~.-601-5243 : 001-120;.999-5250 001-12~-~-5250 001-126-;,~)9-5250 001-120-~-5250 001-120-999-5250 001-120-999-5250 190-183-~-5330 190-182-9f9-5212 001 - 120-999- 5228 lfO- 183-999-5330 190-183-6994 [TEN 8A.11 38.12 99.00 49.00 67.00 25.00 18.60 99.00 49.00 67.00 25.00 18.60 3.72 14.5~ 50.00 50.00 67.00 170.96 15.00 150.00 3.34 16.70 20.00 2.00 10.00 228.00 100.00 102.34. 176.00 10.00 PA;E 5 CHECK 1,530.41 14 75.00 50.00 117.00 170.96 15.00 100.00 102.34 176.00 10.00 100,549.61 vOUcHRE2 CITY OF TBIECULA VOUCHER/ClIEClC REGISTEll FOR ALL PERICI)S FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 100 GAS TAX FI,II~ 190 COMIt/M]TY SERVICES DISTRICT 19) TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 210 CAPITAL IMPROVENEHT PROJ FUND Z80 REDEVELOPNENT AGENCY - CIP 320 /NFORNATION SYSTEMS 390 TCS~ DEBT SERVZCE TOTAL aT 301,117.15 1 1,635.00 225.00 285,820.58 6,190.50 1,2~0.11 2,628.56 600,61~.35 PA~ 1 16:59 CITY OF TBiCULA VGUCIER/CECK IEGISTEIt FOB ALL PBtlQOS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK: WND(3R VEIII)(Xt IILIIBER I)ATE IB.IIBER NANE ITEI4 ACCOUNT ITL=N CHECk: DESCIUPTION ~ER AMOUIIT AROUIIT ABSOLUTE ASPHALT, INC. ABSOLUTE ASPHALT, INC. ABSOLUTE ASPHALT, INC. 50 LB BAGS ABPIIALT 100-16&-601-5218 1,556.80 FREIGHT 100-16~-601-5218 50.00 TAX 100-16~-601-5218 120.65 ** 1,727.65 ?2.785 0317.8195 001168 RAMK OF ABlERIrA SERVICES AS TRUSTEE,PAY AGENT 390-199-999-5227 2,628.56 2,628.56 22786 03/28/95 0004~7 COHTRONIX OF HENET 22786 0:5128195 000~47 COIITRONIX OF HEIET 22786 0:5/28/95 0004~7 CCNTRONIX OF HENET 22786 03/28/95 00O447 COMTRONIX OF HEtET 22786 0:5/28/95 000~7 CONTROtilX OF'HEleET 22786 0:5/28/95 000647 CONTItONIX OF HENET 22786 0:5/28/95 000/~7 CCMTRONIX OF HENET 22786 0:5/28/95 000~7 CONTItONIX OF NEIET 22786 0:5/28/95 000~7 COHTRONIX OF HEMET PMR SUPPLY 320-199-999-5209 209.00 CASE 320-199-999-5209 69. O0 DESK MIC 320-199-999-5209 79.00 LOW LOBS CABLE ~20-199-999-5209 100.00 ANTENNA 320-199-999-5209 176.80 MISC HARDMAREI140UNT ~20-199-999-5209 125.00 PRQGRAMM! NG 320-199-999-5209 52.50 INSTALLATION LABOR :520-199-999-5209 600.00 TAX 320-199-999-5209 58.81 1,270.11 22~7 03128195 0016~ 22~7 03128195 001695 22788 03128195 000756 22/1~8 03128195 000756 03128195 001608 22790 03128195 000481 EDNONDSON CONSTRUCTION EDNONDSON CONSTRUCTION ELLIOTT GROUP, THE ELLIOTT GROUP, THE ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL S GEOTECHN[CAL & ENVIRONN FEB 95 PROGRESS PMT RETENTION WH ON 1NWAt758-1-95 PRK PLAN CHECK REVIEk'$ FEB 95 PRK PLAN CHECK REVIEI4S FEB 95 JOB COHPLETE-~ETENTION DUE PHASE I SITE ASSESSENT 210-165-&41-580~ 68,600.00 210-20:55 6,8&0.00- 1~0-180-.~-5250 1,635.00 193-180-999-5250 225.00 001-20:55 5,860.00 280-1~-~q~-5268 1,800.00 6:5,760.00 -. 1,860,00 5,8~0.00 1,800.00 22791 0:5128195 000520 H D L COREH & CONE, IWC ESTABLISH PROPERTY DATABASE 001-160-999-52/,8 6,800.00 6,800.00 22792 0:5128195 001207 HARTIN J. JASKA, INC. FEB 95 CONTRACTOR SERVICES 210-190-120-5804 210,650.00 22792 03/28/95 001207 HARTIN J. JASKA, INC. FEB 95 CONTRACTON SERVICES 210-1g0-120-5806 16,889.00 22792 03/28/95 001207 HARTIN J. JASKA, ]NC. FEB 95 CONTRACTOR SERVICES 210-1~0-120-5804, 3,276.00 22792 03/28/95 001207 NART[N J. JASKA, INC. RETENTION M/H ]NW/REQUEST 7 210-2035 25,382.60- 22792 03/28/95 001207 HARTIN J. JASKA, INC. FEB 95 CONTRACTOR SERVICE COW4 210-1g0-120-5804 23,376.00 22792 03/28/95 001207 HARTIN J. JASKA, INC. FEB 95 CONTRACTON SERVICES 210-190-120-580~ 16,889.00- 22792 0:5/28/95 001207 RARTIH J. JASKA, INC. FEB 95 CONTRACTON SERVICES 210-1g0-120-580~ :5,276,00- 210,~63.60 2279:5 03128195 001585 PAUL GARDNER CORPORATIO TRAFFIC SIGNAL i MINCHESTER RD 210-165-646-5806 22793 03/28/95 001585 PAUL GARDNER CORPORATIO RETENTION M/H INV# 96313-2 210-2035 9,?2:5.OO 972.30- 8,750.70 22796 03/28/95 001695 PRO-CIVIL ENGINEERING, PALA RD PROGRESS PMT FEB 95 210-165-652-5804 16,802.91 227~6 03/28/95 001695 PRO-CIVIL ENGINEERING, RETENTION U/H INV# 1262 210-2035 1,/k80.29- 13,322.62 227~5 0)128195 000967 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C BLUEPRINT REPRO. IN96-OTCSD 210-190-1:57-5802 22796 03128/95 0004,06 RIVERSIDE CO. SHER/FF'S JAN 95 LAW ENFORCEMENT 001-170-999-5288 176,706.8/, 22796 03/28/95 000606 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF"S JAN 95 LAU ENFORCENENT 001-170-999-5298 11,872.80 22796 03/28/95 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S JAN 95 LAg ENFORCElENT 001-1707999-5290 5,366.7:5 22796 03/28/95 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S JAN 95 LAU ENFOBCEHENT 001-170~999-5291 3,060.34 22796 03/28/95 000/,06 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S JAN 95 ~ ENFONCEIENT 001-170-999-5282 1,672.80 ~ 0:5/28/95 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S JAN 95 LAg ENFORCEHENT 001-170-999-5299 28,898.60 0:5/28/95 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S JAN 95 LAg ENFORCEliNT 001-170-999-529~ 8,978.85 VOUCHRE:~ 03/16/95 VOIJCHER/ CHECK NUllBEe 22796 22796 227~ 22796 227V7 22797 22797 ?.27V7 227'~7 22798 22799 16:59 CHECK DATE 03128195 03/28195 03128195 03128/95 03128/95 03128195 03128195 03128195 03128/95 0:3128/95 O3/28/95 0014~3 0014,83 001A83 0014,~ 001~,83 000621 0005~9 ILUIE RIVERSIDE IX). SHERIFF'S RIVERSIDE CO, SHERIFF'S RIVERSIDE CO, SHERIFF'S RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S TON DODSON & ASSOCIATES TON DOO SON & ASSOCIATES TON DOBSON & ASSOCIATES TOH DODSON & ASSOCIATES TON DODSOIi & ASSOCIATES k'ESTERN RIVERSIDE COLIC UIHI4ER YARADA ASSOCIATE CITY OF TEMECULA VOIJCHER/CNECIC REGISTBt FOR ALL PERIGI)S ITEM DESCRIPTION JAN f5 LAid ENFORCB4ENT jAN 95 LAU ENFORCENENT jAN ~5 LAt/ENFORCBENT DEC ~, BOOKING FEE PREPARE ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY PREPARE ENVIRONNEMTAL STUDY PREPARE ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY PREPARE ENVEROII4ENTAL STUDY RLrTENTZON~/H INVBU-050-8 DUES FOe FY 9~-95 PROGRESS PHT FOe FEB 95 TOTAL CHECKS ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-170-999-5262 001-170-999-5281 001-1230 001-170-999-5273 280-199-999-52/,8 280-1270 280-199-999-52/,8 280-12/0 280-2035 .. 001-100-999-5226 210-190-120-5802 ITBI ANOUliT 1A.646.89 17.18A.17 3,060.33 10.708.80 2.206.02 2.206.02 216.4~8 216./,8 454.50' 8,500.00 7,725.00 CHECI( ANOINT : 281,957.15 : ~,,390.50 8,500.00 7,725.00 600,616.35 ITEM 4 APPROVA CITY ATTORNEY TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Anthony Elmo, Chief Building OfficiaF"~ March 28, 1995 Public Nuisance Abatement - 30301 Nicolas Rd RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council set a public hearing for April 25, 1995, at 7:00 p.m. at 30875 Rancho Vista Rd., for the purpose of confirming the cost to the City for the abatement of a public nuisance at 30301 Nicolas Rd. ; DISCUSSION: On approximately May 11, 1993, Code Enforcement received a complaint regarding an alleged public nuisance located at 30301 Nicolas Rd. After inspection of the premises revealed the existence of weeds, trash, debris, and unsecured dilapidated buildings, abatement proceedings were initiated in accordance with the provisions of Ordinance 90-24 for Public Nuisance Abatement. Notices were subsequently sent to all known owners by both first class and certified mail. In an effort to determine the extent of the nuisance condition, an inspection warrant was applied for and granted by the local district court judge. An inspection was then performed revealing construction debris, concrete foundations, trash and debris throughout the property. As a result of this inspection, staff proceeded to declare the property a public nuisance, requesting that the nuisance be abated in a timely fashion. Upon expiration of the requested abatement period, a hearing was held before an independent hearing officer which resulted in the City being given the authority to cause the abatement of the nuisance condition. Staff obtained the required abatement warrant and has subsequently caused the property to be cleared of all nuisance conditions. The total cost of abatement of this property is $68,856.75. A breakdown of costs which make up this total is as follows: Environmental Control Systems, Inc. Attorney's fees Administrative costs Staff costs 58,600.00 8,297.64 525.00 1.434.11 Grand Total $68,856.7 V:%TONY~,GENDA~30301-SE.PH 3/10/95 tie Agenda Report March 28, 1995 Page 2 RSCAL IMPACT: On October 12, 1994, Council approved an appropriation of e58,600to account no. 001-162-999-5250,Other Outside Services, for the abatement of the nuisance from the property. The additional attorney fees have been expended and recorded the legal services department budget and the remaining administrative and staff cost have been expended end recorded in the Building and Safety Department budget. These costs will be offset through the recording of the special assessment against the property. V:'~TONY%AGENDA~303OI-SE.PH 3110/16 tda ITEM 5 APPROVAl CITY ATTORNEY RNANCE OFR~C~ CITY MANAG CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Council/City Manager FROM: Mary Jane McLarney, Assistant City Manager DATE: March 28, 1995 SUBJECT: Professional Services Contract Renewal for Video Production Services f PREPARED BY: Grant M. Yates, Human Resources Administrator RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the attached professional services contract to Davlin for audio/video production services. BACKGROUND: On August 24, 1993, the City Council awarded a contract for audio/video production services to Davlin. The agreement provides for extensions and amendments by mutual consent on a year-to-year basis through June, 1996. Mr. Lines, owner of Davlin, indicates that costs associated with "live" broadcasts and newly purchased equipment, (to improve the quality of productions), justifies an increase in the per meeting costs for City Council and special sessions· Inland Valley Cable will remain responsible for transmission and broadcast quality. Mr. Lines has proposed no increase in the cost to produce audio-only tapes of Planning Commission meetings. An additional issue which staff wished to factor into the agreement was the production, editing, and insertion of program sponsorships into the City Council meeting programming. Issues of exclusive production, copyright infringements, and cost of production were discussed and resolved. Mr. Lines and City staff propose to amend the agreement, as attached, which provides the following: An increase in per meeting payment for audio/video production of Council meetings from ~700 to ~800; and Instituting the sponsorship program, This program has the potential for paying the full costs of the Dadin contract, Under the program gui.delines, the opportunity is available for three primary sponsors, per meeting, totaling 8375 in sponsorship fees, In addition, two hourly sponsors are possible, totaling ~450 per meeting based on a three,hour meeting. This brings the total sponsorship, per meeting, to ~825, SoonsorshiD Rates - Rates for sponsorship of council meeting programming are set to cover the cost of video taping. Rates may be adjusted as costs increase. The current rates are as follows: Primary Sponsors - $125 per meeting. Hourly Sponsors - $ 75 per hour. These "on-air" sponsorship rates shall be paid by the sponsor directly to the City. The content of the sponsorships may not: * Use a celebrity spokesperson. * Use language or slogans that: * are qualitative ("maker of the finest"), * make superlative or comparative statements ( 'Temecula's largest retailer of...'), * are a call to action or inducement to buy ("visit our showroom, or call...'), include endorsements ('the choice of Chamber of Commerce .' members..."). All production costs are the sole responsibility of the sponsor. The contract is structured with Davlin being responsible for marketing this service. Because the maximum sponsorship fee is ~825, there is a built-in incentive for Davlin to receive an additional e25, per meeting, if all sponsorship slots are filled. Staff has been working with Inland Valley Cablevision and Davlin to ensure a smooth transition to "live" broadcasting. It is anticipated that we will be able to go live by April 25, 1995. Currently, all City Council meetings are taped and retained on video. By moving to a "live" format, tapes will no longer be necessary as a "live" broadcast will take the place of delayed broadcasts. Davlin will capture the "live" meeting on tape for a Saturday morning rebroadcast. In addition, staff is recommending that video tapes no longer be retained for storage, as it is expensive to retain the tapes. A copy of the audio of the meeting will be retained for permanent record storage. FISCAL IMPACT: The City is currently paying ~700 per meeting for audio/video production. The per meeting base cost will increase by ~100 to a total of ~800 an~l up to ~825 if all sponsorship slots are filled. However, the net cost to the City for production of Council broadcasts will be $0 if all program sponsorship slots are filled. R.~AI~iDA~TAJ~I2J~i~ ~ CITY OF TEMECULA PROGRAM SPONSORSHIP GUIDELINES Sponsorships for broadcast of programming initiated by the City of Temecula are subject to the overall test of whether the sponsorship is consistent with the noncommercial character of government access television. Primary Sponsors - Acknowledgements run at the beginning and end of programming. No more than three primary sponsors will be permitted per program. A 10- 15 second message will be allowed for each sponsor. Hourly Soonsore - Acknowledgements run at the cpnclusion of each hour of programming. No more than two sponsors may be acknowledged per hour of programming. A 10-15 second message will be allowed for hourly sponsors. Soonsorshio Content - (1) The acknowledgement may consist of one or two photographs and/or character generator graphics. (2) The acknowledgement may include name, address, and/or telephone number of the sponsor. (3) Audio may be vocal or musical, as long as the sponsor adheres to all applicable copyright infringent laws. (4) Audio may state information on card, but must contain the following lead announcement: Primary Sponsors - "This governmental access program has been presented through the assistance of... name, address, and telephone number). Hourly Sponsors- "The preceding hour of governmental access programming has been presented with the assistance of... name, address, and telephone number). (5) The content may: Describe your business, mentioning up to four target markets, products or services, Show one product or genetically depict up to four product lines Show company employees as an alternative to product depiction Use a company slogan (acceptable in most cases) R:~t,.AND~.DA~frA!~I2.MIS ~ AMENDMENT TO PROFESSIONAL'SERVICES AGREEMENT THIS RRST AMENDMENT TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT is made and entered, as of March 28, 1995, into by and between the CITY OFTEMECULA, a municipal corporation ('City'), and DAVLIN, a sole proprietorship (Consultant'). In consideration of the mutual covenants and promises contained herein the parties agree as follows: 1. Recitals - this amendment is made with respect to the following facts which the parties agree are true and correct: a. On July 1, 1993, the parties hereto entered into that certain agreement entitled "Professional Services' whereby Consultant would parform certain specified audio/video services for the City ('Agreement'). be The parties desire to further amend the Agreement to additional services and ' revise the payment schedule as provided in this amendment. .. 2. Section 1, Services, and Exhibit A incorporated therein, of the Agreement are hereby amended by adding the following services to Exhibit A: 'Produce, edit, and insert program sponsorships into programming for City Council meetings at the rate provided in Section 4D. 'Provide services, equipment and personnel to produce and provide a 'live feed" of City Council meetings for cable TV as directed. "Consultant shall have the non-exclusive right to solicit sponsorships for support of broadcasting of City Council meetings. "Consultant shall produce and/or edit~ and insert all sponsorships into City programming of City Council meetings. In connection with such services, Consultant shall obtain all copyright licenses and/or other approvals as may be required to broadcast the sponsorship.' 3. Section 3 - Payment, of the Agreement, is hereby amended to read as follows: "Payment the City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, at the par project/meeting rate set forth in Exhibit B, attached hereto. This amount shall not exceed nineteen thousand, eight hundred dollars (e 19,800) per year unless additional payment is approved by the City Council; provided, however, that the City Manager may approve additional payment not to exceed ten percent (10%) of the yearly maximum payment.' City agrees to provide consultant with advanced notification of meeting cancellation; however, if the City can not notify consultant of meeting cancellation before 12:00 noon of meeting date, then City will compensate consultant at a flat rate of $100.00. 4. Exhibit B to the Agreement as incorporated into Section 3 - Payment, is hereby amended by deleting the schedule of payment set forth therein and adding the following payment schedule: ~ R.-%LAI(2RDA~STAFF12.MI8 3~2J~ "City agrees to pay Consultant at the following par project/meeting rate: A. Audio/video for City Council meetings and special meetings - ~800 per meeting regardless of length; B. Audio for Planning Commission meetings - ~ 150 par meeting regardless .- of length; C. Audio for other City Commission meetings ~125 per meeting regardless of length; D. Consultant agrees to charge program sponsors, both primary and hourly, a mutually agreed upon fee, not/co exceed $100, to produce and or edit and insert sponsorships into City programming of City Council meetings. City shall not be responsible for the payment of this fee." 5. Section 6 - Termination of the Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows: Termination - this agreement shall terminate on June 30, 1997 unless extended by amendment of this Agreement. 6. Section 7 - Indemnification of the Agreement, is hereby amended by adding the following sentence to the section: "Consultant's indemnification of City as described in this Section specifically includes indemnification for copyright infringement or unauthorized use of copyrighted material." 7. Except as specifically provided herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the date first written above. CITY OF TEMECULA Jeffrey E. Stone Mayor ATTEST: June Greek City Clerk R:XLAIqII~J3A%ffA!~'I2.M~ ~ APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter M. Thorson City Attorney DAVLIN David C. Lines R:~LAN~IDA~TAP~I2.M/S ~ ITEM 6 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF.TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council City Clerk March 28, 1995 Records Destruction Approval · 'APPROVAL , CITY ATTORNEY. FINANCE OFFIC CITY MAI~AGE RECOMMENDATION: Approve scheduled destruction of certain records as provided under the City of Temecula approved Records Retention Policy. BACKGROUND: On March 22, 1992, the City Council approved Resolution No. 92-17 which authorizes the destruction of certain city records which have become outdated, obsolete or are excess documents, in compliance with Sections 34090 through 34090.7 of the Government Code. The records management program, administered by the City Clerk's Office, is in the process of microfilming all inactive records that are over two (2) years old. The attached exhibit details plot plans for the years 1988 and 1989 which have been copied to microfilm. Three microfilm copies have been prepared, one to be kept in the Planning Department, one in the City Clerk's records vault and one in permanent off-site storage. The City Attorney has reviewed this request and has signed Exhibit "1" of the Annual Review as provided for in Resolution No. 92-17. ATTACHMENTS: JSG Destruction of Records Request List of Records recommended for destruction DATE: Man:h 1,5, 1995 Attached is a print out of: Conditional Use Permit (Ret~fion Type 20308) from 1117/61 to 12/12/89; TmaZmrary Outdoor Use Permits (Rstmtion Type 20307) from 4/11/90 m 2/15/91; Lot ~ Adjustment (Retention Typ~ 20312) from 4110181 to 12/18/90; Plot Plans (Rstention Type 20324) from 1/19/88 to 10/13/92. These reinhis have boon microfilmed in triplicate with a oopy distributed to the City Clerk's Re~ords Vault, the Planning Dep-d~ien~ and a copy to the Vault in San Diego. The following have reviewed and approved this destruction rsquest. Pursuant to the rsquirsnents of Govmnn~ Cods Section 34090, I hereby give my oonsent to the destm~tion of re~rds under the diregtion of the City Clerk pursuant to the City of Temecula's adopted Destruction of Obsolete Records Policy. ~ City Attorney: 6 Planning Director D~ UOESTY...RRO61 City ef Telan:aLe Doc. net ......... 161 Pep 1 03/07/199S FILes Beady. for Destruction btontlon Code... ~QSQe lh&O:4S I)~tructim Date. 03/01/19gS ~ Item let. FILe Reference # Storage Nedia ~ Date Bet. Irief Description Cede hourtry CLass Itorege Location Location leference 161 01/17/1961 5)8 Conditional Use Permit 538 20308 Q019 FiLm 3821N1AQQQ1 Group i 161/120/The VauLt 161 12/15/1965 617 Conditional USe Permit 817 2030~ 0019 FiLm 3821N1AOOOl P-to;; 161/120/The VauLt " 161 06/01/1966 aS& Conditional USe Permit 85& 20308 0019 FiLm )8~INIAOOOl Group t 161/120/The VauLt 161 07/26/1966 870 CQrdtttormL Use Permit 870 20308 0019 FILm 3a~INI~OOOl Gro; z 161/120/The VauLt 161 11/20/196? 966 Conditional Use Permit 9~6 ~0308 00t9 FILm )821NIAOOO1 atom ! 161/1!O/The VauLt 161 12/27/1967 969 Conditional Use Permit 969 ZQIQ8 0019 FiLm 3e~IN1AOOOl Group I 161/120/The VauLt 161 0~/09/1968 9S3 Conditional Use Permit 983 20308 0019 FiLm 3821N1AOOOl Group ! 161/120/The VauLt 161 06/11/1968 ~95 Conditional Use Permit 995 20308 0019 FiLm SaZlNIAOOOl Group ! 161/120/The VauLt 1, J8/13/1908 1000 Conditional Use Permit 1000 ~OSO8 0019 FiLm 3821N1AOOOl Gro; i 161/120/The VauLt 161 08/13/1968 1005 Conditional Use Permit 1005 20308 0019 FiLm 3821N1-a--m~--I Group i 161/120frhe VauLt 161 09/11/1968 1006 Conditional USe Permit 1006 Z0308 0019 FiLm 38~IN1A0001 GPoup ! 161/120frhe VauLt 161 12/11/1968 1027 Conditional Use Permit 1027 ~ 0019 FiLm 3821NIAQ(X)1 Group ! 161/120/The VauLt 161 01/28/19~9 103~ Conditional Use Permit 10)~ 20306 0019 FiLm 3821NIAO001 Group ! 161/120/The VauLt 161 06/10/1~9 10~0 Conditional Use Permit 1060 ~)308 0019 FiLm 3821N1AOOOl Group ! 161/120/The VauLt 161 10/26/1969 I0~) Conditional Use Permit 1090 20308 0019 FiLm 3821N1AOOOl Group i 161/120/The VauLt 161 ~2/10/1969 1102 Conditional Use Permit 1102 20308 0019 FiLm 3821NIAO001 Group ! 161/120/The VauLt 16/1~-~01/27/1970 11(X Conditional Use Permit 110~ 20308 0019 FILB 3821N1AO001 Group I 161/120/The VauLt 161 03/10/1970 1127 Conditional Use Permit 1127 20308 0019 FiLB 3821NIAOO01 Group ! 161/120/The VauLt mmESTY...RRQ61 City of TeascaLe Page 2 QS/O7/le95 FILe. le"dy far Deetructlen lh&Q:&S Doc. Item let. FILe Reference · Storage liedie Rot. Date Rot. Brief Descripttan Code Security CLue Storage Locitim Lacetim Bell / 161 10116/197Q 1208 Conditional LIme Permit 1208 2031)8 QQ19 FiLm 3281N1AIXX)l Group I 161/12Q/The VauLt 161 11/10/1971) 122Q Conditional Use Permit 1220 20308 QQ19 FILm 3821NINX)Q1 Group ! 161/120rrhe VauLt 161 01/27/1971 12/,7 Conditional Use Permit 1247 20308 0019 FiLm 3821NIAO001 Grot; ! 161/120/The VauLt 161 0A/27/1971 129& Conditional Use Permit 129~ 20308 0019 FiLm 3821NIAO001 Group ! 161/120/The VauLt 161 07/27/1971 1173 Conditional Use Permit 1173 20308 QQ19 FILm 3821NIAQQQ1 Group ~ 161/120/Th, VauLt 161 02/Q2/1972 1369 Conditional Use Permit 1369 20308 Q019 FiLm 3821N1AQQQ1 Group [ 161/12Q/The VauLt 161 11/~9/1972 1/~9U Conditional Use Permit 1~9-V ~N}3(}8 0019 FILm ~1N1AO001 Group z 161/12Q/The vault 161 03/01/1973 1505k/Condftiermt Use Permit 1505-W 21)308 QQ19 FILm )821N1-A---nO01 Group ] 161/120/The VauLt 161 07/23/1973 1538U Conditional Use Permit 1538-U 20308 QQ19 FILm 3a21N1AOOOl / Group I 161/12Q/The VauLt 161 021071197/, 1608 Conditional Use Permit 1608 20308 QQ19 FILm 3821NIAQOQ1 Group I 161/12Q/The VauLt 161 03/21/197/, 1615C Conditional Use Permit 1615-C 20308 0019 FiLm 3821NIAQQQ1 Group [ 161/120/The VauLt 161 02/25/1975 1702V Conditional Use Permit 1702-M 20308 0019 FiLm 3821N1AO001 Grc~ ] 1611120/The VauLt 161 Q~/Z3/1976 176~v Conditional Use Permit 1769-U 20308 QQ19 FiLm 3821NIAIXX)l Group t 161/12Q/The VauLt 161 05/03/1976 1827V Conditional Use Permit 1827-~ 20308 0019 FiLm 3821Nl-'---M01 Group i 161/12Qfrhe VauLt 161 06/11/1976 18&lV Conditional Use Permit 18&1-V 2Q$08 QQ19 FILm 3821NIAQQQ1 Group I 161/1ZO/The VauLt 161 10/2211976 18861J Conditional Use Permit 1886-V 20308 QQ19 FILm 3821N1ADQQ1 Gma ! 161/12Q/The VauLt 161 1212211976 1909V Conditional Use Permit 1909-U 20308 Q019 FILm 38211rlAIXX)l ~ Group I 161/120/The VauLt 161 07/11/1977 196Z1~ Conditional Use Permit 1962-M 20308 0019 FILm 3821NIAO001 Group I 1611120/The VauLt IUIDESTY...BIt061 City of TiLe Pale 03/07/1~15 Fi tee lie for Oestrdcti~n lh&Os&5 F/''' Eta let. FiLe Rotefface # Store Nedia i, ' Date liar. Brief liee~riptlen Cede lecurlty CLass Storage LeeaLlen Leestime Reference 161 O7/22/1FTT 1961V Conditional Use Permit 1961-V 20306 0019 Film 3821NIAOG01 Group ! 161/120/The Vmutt 161 12/Q6/1977 1992~ Conditional Use Permit t992-V 20308 0019 FILm 3821NIAiXX)1 stomp I 161/12Q/The VauLt : 161 09/18/1978 2077V Conditional Use Permit ZQ77-U ZQ3Q6 0019 FILm Xa21N1AOQOl ~rCN~ I 161/120/The VauLt 161 09/2511978 2123~ Conditional k Permit 2t25-U 20308 0019 FILm 3821NIAOOO1 Group z 161/12Q/The VauLt 161 03/05/1979 2z3~ Conditional Use Permit 2ZSG-U 20308 0019 FiLm ~INIAOQOl Group ! 161/12Q/The VauLt 161 05/14/1979 2Z~IU Conditimet Use Permit 22~1-&~ 20~8 0019 FiLm 3821111A000t Group I 161/12Q/The VauLt 161 05/15/1979 ?~36&~ ConditionaL USe Permit 2Z36-k/ 20308 0019 FiLm 3821N1AQO01 Group Z 161/120/The VauLt 161 07/23/1979 2052 Conditional Use Permit 2052 20306 0019 FiLm 3821WIAO001 ~ Gro(4) ! 161/120/The VauLt ~, 08/31/1979 2205~ ConditionaL Use Permit 2205-V 20308 0019 FiLm 3821NIAO001 : Group Z 161/120/The VauLt 161 11/13/1979 2302V ConditionaL Use Permtt 2302-V 20306 0019 FiLm 3821NIAO001 Group ! 161/120/The VauLt 161 11/13/1979 2303~/Conditional Use Permit 2303-U 20308 QQ19 FiLm 3821N1AIX)QI Group I 161/12Q/The VauLt 161 o2/27/198o 2325v Conditional Use Permit Z325-W 20308 0019 FiLm 3821N1AOOOl Group I 161/12Q/The VauLt 161 Q?/1Q/1980 2333W Conditional Use Permit 2333-~ 20308 0019 FiLm 3821N1AOOOl Oroq~ I 161/12Q/The VauLt 161 o?/1o/198o 23~u Conditional Use Permit Z3~-U 20308 0019 FiLm 3821N1AOOO1 Group x 161/12Q/The VauLt 161 ol/27/1981 2A67~ CQncllttonaL Use Permit 2~67-U 20308 0019 FILm ~821N1A0001 Group I 161/120/The VauLt 161 o2/23/t981 2438u Conditional Use Permit 2438-U 20308 0019 FiLm 3821NtAQOOl Group: 161/12Q/The VauLt ~ o3/o9/1981 2~3v Conditional Use Permit 24~-U 20308 0019 FILm X21mAOOOl Group ] 161/12Q/The VauLt 161 10/13/19812513U Conditional Usa Permit 2513-~ 20308 0019 FiLm 3821NtA0001 Srma ] 161/120/The VauLt RlQES1"t...IIR061 City ef Teamcute hie 03/0//1995 FiLe Reedy for Destruction lh&l):d Ooc. item Rat. FiLe Reference · Store Ikdl8 Ref. Date Ref. Brief Description Code Security Ctm Store Lmtion Lmtion lift, 161 0~/26/1982 254~ Conditional Use Permit 25/ki 29308 0019 Fits Group ! 161/120/The VauLt 161 12/20/1982 2613 ConditiomL Use Permit 261) 20)08 0019 FILl 38211rlAOO01 Group ! 161/120rfhe VauLt : 161 03/00/198& 26744/CQrdftionat Use Permit 267&-V 20308 0019 FILl 3821NIAO001 Group ! 161/lZOrrhe vwtt 161 03/13/198~ 26~ Conditional Use Permit 2666 20308 0019 FILl 3821NIAOOOl Group ! 161/120rrhe VauLt 161 06/25/198& 2718U Conditional U;e Permit ZT18-V 20208 0019 FiLm 3821M1A0001 Group x 161/120/The VauLt 161 QT/)Q/19&G 2723U Conditional Use Permit 2723-U 20308 0019 FiLm ~SZ1NIAO001 Group i 161/120/The VauLt 161 12/06/1985 2835 Conditional Use Permit 2835 20308 0019 FiLm 38~1N1AOOO1 Group ! 161/12Q/The VauLt ........................................................... ,-- ...... 161 01/07/1986 2809 Conditional Use Permit 2809 20308 0019 FiLm 3821N1A0001 Group i 161/12Q/The VauLt 161 01/31/1986 28A6 Conditional Use Permit 2866 20306 0019 FILm 3921111AO001 Group I 161/120/The VauLt 161 02/21/1986 28~7 Conditional Use Permit 2867 20308 0019 FiLm 3821NIAOO01 Group ] 161/12Q/The VauLt 161 03/28/1986 2857 Conditional Use Permit 2857 20308 0019 FiLm 3821141A0001 Group I 161/120/The VauLt 161 091Z3/1986 28~9 Ccmditiormt USe Permit 28~9 20308 0019 FiLm 3821N1AQQQ1 GroLq~ i 161/126/The VauLt 161 10127/1986 2016 Conditional Use Permit 2016 20308 0019 FiLm 3821N1AIXX)l Group I 161/120/The VauLt 161 10/1311987 2708 Conditional Use Permit 2708 20308 0019 FiLl 3821NIAQOQ1 Group I 161/120/The VauLt 161 08/16/1988 3000 Conditional Use Permit 3000 20308 0019 FILm 38211rlAO001 Group i 161/120/The Vautt 161 11/30/1988 2935 Conditional Use Permit 2935 20308 0019 FiLm )SZINIAQOQ1 Group ] 161/120/The VauLt 161 o3/16/1989 3036 Conditional Use Permit 3036 203(0 0019 FiLm )8~INIAIX)QI ~ Group ! 161/120/The VauLt 161 06/07/1989 3003 Conditional Use Permit 3QQ3 20)08 0019 FiLm 3821N1A0001 Sroup Z 161/120/The VauLt RItDESTY...ItR061 City ef TiLe Page 5 0S/07/1~J5 FILe Reedy fer DastrJctlen ~ Item Bet. FiLe leference · Store Nedl8 b : Date Ref. Brief Descriptfen Code Security Ctm Storage Letlee LocaLlee Reference 161 08/07/1; )062 CoMttiormL Use Pemtt ~062 20308 0019 FILB 3821NIAIX)01 Grm4; Z 161/120/The VauLt 161 00/01/1999 ~ Conditional time Pemtt )Q~6 20308 Q019 FiLe 3821NIA(XX)l Group i 161/120/The VauLt " 161 09/06/1989 2901 CoMitionaL Use Permit 2901 20~ 0019 FiLm 3821N1A0001 Gro~ ! 161/12Q/The VauLt 161 10/06/1989 2980 Conditional Use Pemtt 2980 20308 0019 Firm ~821NtAQO01 Group ! 161/12Q/The VauLt 161 12/18/1989 3076 CoMitionaL Use Pemit 3076 20308 0019 FiLe Sro;; 161/120/The vault 77 Records IUIDESTY...RRQ61 City of TabLe Doc. Rot ......... 161 Pete 1 o3/o7/1995 FiLm Iteedy fer iitrmtlen. letentice Code... 2030/ 11s38:42 lastructkn Date. 03/01/1995 Doc. Item let. FiLe Reference · Storage Mie ~ Rot, Date Ref, Briof Description" Code Security CLass Store Lecatton Location bf~ ,, 161 06/22/1; 1067 CcmditionmL Use Permit 1067 20307 0019 FiLm 3821141AOO61- Group I 161/120/The VauLt 161 (X/11/199Q I TQUP I 203Q? QQI? FiLm 3821NIAQOQ1 Group i 161/12Q/The VauLt : t61 06/1&/1990 2 TQUP 2 ZQ3Q? QQ17 Fitm 38ZtNl-'--n~--1 GPaup X 161/lZO/The VauLt 161 07/z3/1990 3 TOUP 3 203Q? QQI? Fi Lm 38ZlmAOOOl Group ! 161/1ZO/Th, VauLt 161 Qe/O3/199Q & TQUP & Z(X~Q? QQ1? Fi Lm 3821NIA(XX)1 Group ! 161/12Q/The VauLt 161 10/0~/1990 s TOUP 5 20307 0017 FiLm 3aZlN1AOOOl Group Z 161/lZO/Th, VauLt 161 10/~/1990 6 TOUP 6 20307 0017 Fi Lm 38ZtN1AOOOl Group I 161/120/The VauLt 161 1Q/Oe/199Q ? TQUP ? Z03Q? QQI? FiLm 38ZIN1AOO01 Grcx4) ! 161/1ZO/The VauLt 161 10/11/1990 9 TOUP 9 20307 0017 FiLm 3821N1AOQQ1 Group t t61/12Q/The VauLt 161 10/18/1990 8 TOUP 8 ZO3O? 0017 FiLm 38ZlN1AOQOl Gro~ Z 161/1ZQ/The VauLt 161 10/27/1990 11 TQUP 11 2030? QQI? FiLm 38ZlNl-'---ng01 Groqo I 161/lZO/The VauLt 161 11/08/1990 12 TQUP lZ ZQ3Q? QQI? FiLm 3821N1AQQQ1 Group [ 161/120/The VauLt 161 11/11/1990 10 TQUP 10 20307 0017 FiLm 3821NIAO001 6rOL; ] 161/120/The VauLt 161 11/14/1990 1) TOUP 1) 20307 0017 FiLm 3821N1AOOQI Grow [ 161/120/The VauLt . 161 11/14/1990 14 TOUP 16 20307 0017 Fi Lm )821111A0001 Group ! 161/120/The VauLt 161 11/26/1990 15 TOUP 15 20307 0017 FiLm 3821NIAOQ01 Group ! 161/120/The VauLt 161 11/27/1990 16 TOUP 16 20307 0017 FiLm 3821N1AO001 Group ! 161/120/The VauLt 161 11/30/1990 11 TQUP 11 20)01 0011 FiLm 3821NIAOO01 6reup i 161/120/The VauLt RleESTY...RR061 City of Teemcute Page 2 03/07/1995 FiLe Reedy for ketrwtion Do/''-` item Rat. FiLe Reference · Store Neelie RS / Date let. Brief Description Code Security Ctm Storage Location Location Reference 161 01/31/1991 18 TOUP 18 20307 0017 FILm 3821N1AQO01 Group i 161/120/The VauLt 161 01/3111g91 19 TOUP 19 20307 0017 F t ks 3821H1AO001 Group ! 161/120frhe VauLt " 161 02/0t/1~91 20 TOUP 20 20307 0017 Fiim 3821N1AOOOl Group I 161/120/The VauLt 161 0Z/15/1991 21 TOUP 21 20307 0017 Fitm 3821N1AO001 Group ! 161/120/The VauLt 22 Records Processed mtDESTY...RRQ61 City ef TeecaLm Doc. Ref ......... 161 Pale 1 03/0711995 FILes lidlr for Imtructten Retention C~d,... ZOS12 lh4&:18 Destruction Date. 03/01/199S Doc. Iron let. FILe Reference # =toraee Redla Itef. Date Ref. Brief Description Cede Security CLass Itorage Location Location left / 161 Q~/1011981 1223 Lot Line Adjustment 1223 20312 Q018 Ft tm 3821141AIX)Ql' Group Z 161/120/The VauLt 161 Q~/15/1981 1238 Lot Line Adjustment 1238 29312 (X)18 FILE 3821N1AOQQ1 QPM ! 161/12Q/The VauLt " 161 0511511981 1256 Lot Line Adjustment 1256 20312 0018 FitE GrOup I 1611120/The Vault 161 05/18/1981 1253 Lot Line Adjustment 1253 20312 0018 FILE 3821N1AOQ01 Group ! 161/120/The Vault 161 06/16/1981 1215 Lot Line Adjustment 1215 20312 0518 FiLE 5821NIAO001 Group I 16111ZQ/The VauLt 161 07/13/1981 1295 Lot Line Adjustment 1295 20312 0018 FiLE 3821N1AOOOl Group I 16!/12Q/The VauLt 161 07/17/1981 1299 Lot Line Adjustment 1299 20312 Q018 FiLm Group [ 161/120/The vault 161 08/19/1981 1317 Lot Line Adjustment 1317 20312 0018 FiLm 3821N1AOQOl Group I 161/12Q/The Vault 161 08/27/1981 lS22 Lot Line AdjusUaent 1)22 20~12 0018 FiLE ~21NIAO001 r-r~up ! 161/120/The Vautt 161 10113/1981 1)~0 Lot Line Adjustment 1360 28312 0018 FiLE )821NIAO001 Grcx4~ [ 161/120rrhe VauLt 161 11/30/1981 1)62 Lot Line Adjustmat 1)62 20312 0018 FiLE 3821141A0001 Group i 161/120/The VauLt 161 12/29/1981 1)88 Lot Line Adjustment 1388 28312 0016 FiLE 3821N1AOO01 Group I 161/120rrhe VauLt 161 07121/1982 1507 Lot Line Adjustment 1507 20312 0018 FiLE 3821NIAO001 Group i 1611120/The VauLt 161 10/15/1982 15~kB Lot Line Adjustment 15~8 20312 0018 Ft LE 3821N1-A-O00--1 Group I 1611120/The Vault 161 12/13/1982 1586 Lot Line Adjustment 1586 20312 0018 File 5821NIAO001 Group I 161/120/The Vault 161 12/13/1982 1587 Lot Line Adjustment 1587 20312 0018 File 3821N1AO001 Group ] 161/120/The Vault 161 12/17/1987. 1590 Lot Line Adjustment 1590 20312 0018 File )821N1A-nO0--1 Group I 161/120/The Vault 161 03/15/1983 16&8 Lot Line Adjustment 16&8 20~12 0018 File 3821N1AO001 Gro~ i 161/120/The Vault ILeEITY...NI061 City of Teemcute Peee 2 0310TI1995 FILe Reedy for Oestructlen 11:&&:18 D/~ item let. FILe Reform # Itorege ila I~ ,~ Date lof. Brief I)acrtptlen Cede lecurity Ctau Itm Leestim Leutlen Ioference 161 07/01/1983 1716 Lot Line Adjustment 1716 20312 0018 FItm 3821NIAO4)01 Group i 161/120/The Vault 161 02/22/198& 1858 Lot Line Adjustment 1858 20312 0018 Film 3821N1AO001 Gro~F i 161/120/The Vault : 161 02/22/198& 1859 Lot Line Adjustrant 1859 20512 0018 Film 3821111A0001 Groq; ] 161/120/The Vault .............................................................. . .... 161 02/28/198~ 1865 Lot Line Adjuslxent 1865 20312 0018 FILe 3821HI-A---nO01 Group i 161/120/The Vault 161 03/05/198& 18&7 Lot Line Adjusment 18&7 20~12 0018 File )821N1AO001 Group i 161/120/The Vault 161 03/)0/198& 1900 Lot Line Adjustmat 1900 20512 0018 File 3821N1AO001 Group I 161/120/The Vault 161 0~/26/198~ 1906 Lot Line Adjustment 1906 20512 0018 File 3821N1~--n~-I Group ! 161/120/The Vault ........................................................... -. ...... 161 0~/26/198& 1907 Lot Line Adjustment 1907 20312 0018 File 3821NIAO001 ~__ Group I 161/120/The Vault j .............................................................. lt, J6/Ot,/198~ 1973 Lot Line Adjustment 1923 20312 0018 File 3821NIA(XX)1 : Group i 161/120/The Vault 161 06/22/198& 191) Lot Line Adjustment 1913 20312 0018 Film 3821NIAO001 Group i 161/120/The Vault 161 06/29/19&~ 19)8 Lot Line Adjustment 19)8 20312 0018 Film 3821N1AO001 Group I 161/12OfFhe Vault 161 07/03/198~ 2339 Lot Line Adjustment 2339 20~12 0018 Film 3821NIAO001 Group I 161/120/The Vault 161 08/24/19~ 2006 Lot Line Adjustment 2006 20312 0018 File 3821NIAO001 Groq~ I 161/120/The Vault 161 10/19/198~ 200~ Lot Line Adjustment 200~ 20312 0018 Film 3821N1-s---m~-I GrokF i 161/120frhe Vault : 161 12/06/198~ 2035 Lot Line Adjustment 20)5 20512 0018 Film 3821N1-s---N~-1 Group I 161/120/The Vault 161 03/03/1985 2075 Lot Line Adjustment 2075 20~12 0018 File 3821NIAO001 Group ! 161/120/The Vault 16~---03/15/1985 216t, Lot Line Adjustment 216& 20~12 0018 Film 3821Nl~__n~_1 Group ] 161/120/The Vault 161 0~/26/1985 2115 Lot Line Adjustment 2115 20312 0018 Film 3821NIAO001 Grc~ ! 161/120frhe Vault RROESTY,,,RRQ61 City of TamecaLm Page Q3/QT/1995 FiLes Ready ~or Desink'tim 11:4&:18 Doc. Item Ret. FILe Reference · Storage Ikdle let. Date lot. Brief lascriptten Code Security CLan Storage Leestim LeesLien let& 161 08/13/1985 2190 Lot Line Adjustment 2190 20~12 0018 FILE 3821N1AOO94 Grc&e I 161/120/The VauLt 161 09/1)/1985 2197 Lot Line Adjustment 2197 2(512 0018 FiLm 3821NIAOIW1 Group i 161/120/The VauLt : 161 09/16/1985 2198 Lot Line Adjustmet 2198 20512 0018 Fi LE 3821Nl~--n~-1 Grc~ ! 161/120/The VauLt 161 09/26/1985 2203 Lot Line Adjustment 2203 20312 0018 FILm )a21N1AOOO1 Group i 161/lZO/The VauLt 161 10/25/1985 _~?73 Lot Line Adjustment ~ 20312 Q018 FiLm 3821NIAOOO1 Group I 161/120rrhe VauLt 161 11/25/1985 2235 Lot Line Adjustment 2235 20312 0018 FiLm 3821N1AO001 Gro~ i 161/12Q/The VauLt 161 11/26/1985 22A6 Lot Line Adjustment 2246 20312 0018 FILm 3821NIA(XX)I Group Z 161/120/The VauLt 161 01/21/1986 2266 Lot Line Adjustment 2266 20312 0018 FiLm 3821N1AOOOl Group z 161/126/The VauLt 161 02/03/1986 2286 Lot Line Adjustment 2286 20312 QQ18 FILm 3821N1AOOO1 Group I 161112Q/The VauLt ................................................................ 161 02/07/1986 2281 Lot Line Adjustment 2281 20312 QQ18 FiLm SaZ1N1AOOOl Group I 161/12Q/The VauLt 161 02/07/1986 2287 Lot Line Adjustment 2287 20312 0018 FiLm )821NIAQOQ1 SPooF ! 161/l~O/The VauLt 161 03/26/1986 Z307 Lot Line Adjustment 2507 20312 Q018 FILm 3821NIAOOOl Group i 161/12Q/The VauLt 161 03/26/1986 23~ Lot Line Adjuslaaent Z3~ 20312 Q018 FiLm 3821N1A~1 Gro~ i 161/126/The VauLt 161 (~/~/1986 2317 Lot Line Adjustment 2317 20312 QQ18 FILm 3a21N1AOOO1 Group I 161/12Q/The VauLt 161 07/12/1986 2394 Lot Line AdjustElnt 239& 20312 QQ18 FILE 3821NIAOOO1 Qr~m x 161/IZO/The VauLt 161 08/14/1986 2392 Lot Line Adjustment 2392 203t2 QQ18 FiLm SaZlNl~--m~-1 Group Z 161/126/The VauLt 161 1Q/22/1986 2405 Lot Line Adjustment 2405 20312 QQ18 FILm 3821N1AQQQ1 .~"~ Group t 161/126/The VauLt 161 11/13/1986 2~12 Lot Line Adjustmet 2~12 20312 QQ18 FILm Sa~IN1AOOOl Group I 161/126/The VauLt ILeESTY,,,RB061 City of TiLe Page 03/07/1995 FILes Reedy for Instructlea 11:66:18 ~ Tim Bet. FiLe Reference dl Storage INdia k / Bate Ref, Brief Description Cede kcurity Ctau Storage Location L~cmtion Iofm 161 11/21/1986 2626 Lot Line Adjustment 2626 20312 0018 FILE 38;1NIA0001 Group ! 161/120/The VauLt 161 11/21/1996 2627 Lot Line Adjustment 2627 20312 0018 FILE 3821N1A0001 Group I 161/120/The VauLt 161 11/21/1986 2628 Lot Line Adjustment 2628 20312 0018 FILE 3821KtAO001 Group ! 161/120/The VauLt 161 11/21/1986 2629 Lot Line Adjustment 2629 20312 0018 FiLE 3821N1A0001 _. Group ! 161/120/The VauLt 161 12/02/1986 2625 Lot Line Adjustment 2625 20312 0018 FILE 3821N1A0001 Grm4~ ! 161/120/The VauLt 161 12/16/1986 26)7 Lot Line Adjustment 2637 20~12 0016 FILE 3821141A0001 Gre; Z 161/120/The VauLt 161 01/16/1987 2656 Lot Line Adjustment 2456 20)12 0018 FiLE 3821111A0001 Group [ 161/120/The VauLt 161 06/17/1987 2501 Lot Line Adjustment 2501 20312 0018 FILE 3821111A0001 ~. Group ! 161/120/The VauLt 't, 05/02/1987 2518 Lot Line Adjustment 2518 20312 0018 FiLE 3821N1A0001 GrOLq~ ! 161/120/The VauLt 161 07/16/1987 25~z, Lot Line Adjustment ~ 20)12 0018 FiLE 3821NIA0001 Group ] 161/120/The VauLt 161 07/16/1987 2565 Lot Line Adjustment 2565 20312 0018 FiLE )821N1A0001 Group ) 161/120/The VauLt 161 07/16/1987 2550 Lot Line Adjustment 2550 20312 0018 FiLE )821N1AOQ01 Group t 161/120/The VauLt 161 07/16/1987 2551 Lot Line Adjustment 2551 20312 0018 FiLE 3821111A0001 Gro~ ! 161/120/The VauLt 161 07/16/1987 2552 Lot Line Adjustment 2552 20312 0018 FiLE )821NIA0001 Group ] 161/1Z0/The VauLt 161 98/07/1987 2559 Lot Line Adjuster 2559 20312 0018 FiLE 3821N1A0001 Group t 161/120/The VauLt 161 08/19/1987 2785 Lot Line Adjustment 2785 20)12 0018 FiLE 3821N1A0001 Group ! 161/120/The VauLt 1/,'--- 09/03/1987 2577 Lot Line Adjustment 2577 20312 0018 FiLE 3821NIL--M01 Group ! 161/t~O/The VauLt 161 10/08/1987 2598 Lot Line Adjustment 2598 20312 0016 FILE 3821N1A0001 Group i 161/120/The VauLt IUIDES~...IIR061 City of TeemaLe Pale 5 15/03'/1995 Fitera lead~ fer Mtrtmtlen 11:&&818 Doc. Item Bet. FiLe Reference · Store Mii ~ Rof. IMte lef. Brief I)ee~riptim r~xi security ctau Itoraee Loutlee Location left / 161 10/20/1~87 2595 Lot Line Adjustrant 2595 20~12 0018 Fitl 3821111A0001 Group ! 161/120/The VauLt 161 11/06/1987 2607 Lot Line Adjemtxent 2607 20~12 0018 FILE 3821Nl10001 G~oup i 161/12Q/The VauLt : 161 11/13/1987 2612 Lot Line Adjustment 2612 20312 0018 FILm ~821N1-a---n~-1 Groq~ ! 161/126/The VauLt 161 12/01/1987 2618 Lot Line Adjustment 2618 20312 0018 FiLm 3821N1AO001 Grm~ i 161/12Q/The VauLt 161 12/0~/1987 2620 Lot Line Adjustment 2620 2Q312 0018 FILm 3821NIAQ001 6ro~ Z 161/120/The VauLt 161 12/09/1987 2613 Lot Line AdjmtEmnt 2613 20312 0018 FiLm · 3821NIA0001 Groulo I 161/120/The VauLt 161 12/10/1987 2625 Lot Line Adjusment 2625 20312 0018 FILm ~8211tlA0001 Group I 161/120/The VauLt 161 01/28/1988 2656 Lot Line Adjustment 2656 20~12 0018 FILE ~821N1AO001 Group I 161/12Q/The VauLt ~-~ 161 02/01/1988 2660 Lot Line Adjusment 2660 20~12 0018 FtLm 3821N1AO001 Group [ 161/120/The VauLt 161 02/17/1988 2668 Lot Line Adjuslaent 2668 20~12 0018 FILm ~821N1AO001 Groq~ i 161/120/The VauLt 161 03/25/1988 2686 Lot Line Adjuslaent 2686 21512 0018 FtLm 3821NIAO001 Group I 161/120/The VauLt 161 0~/12/1988 2700 Lot Line Adjuslaent 2700 20~12 0018 FILm ~821N1AO001 Group I 161/12Q/The VauLt 161 0~/13/1988 2692 Lot Line Adjustment 2692 28~12 0018 FILE ~21N1AO001 Group i 161/12Q/The VauLt 161 (X/27/1988 2701 Lot Line Adjustment 2701 21512 0018 FILm 3821N1A---n~-1 Group I 161/120/The VauLt 161 0~/Z8/1988 26?/, Lot Line Adjustment 26?/, 20312 0018 FiLm 3821N1AOOOl Group I 1611126frhe VauLt 161 05/19/1988 2717 Lot Line Adjustment 2717 Z151Z 0018 FiLm 3821N1AOOOl G~4o ] 161/120/The VauLt 161 06/30/1988 27/,2 Lot Line Adjustment 27/,2 20312 0018 Fttm 3821N1A0001 ~ Group ! 161/120/The VauLt 161 07/07/1988 27/,5 Lot Line Adjusment 27/,5 20312 0018 FILm 3821NIA0001 Group ] 161/120/The VauLt IRDESTY,,,RR061 City of Tamecute Page 6 0]/0111995 Filem Itemd~ for eemtructlen 11:44:18 ~ item let, File Reference I Store Nedl8 R, J Date liar. Brief Oeecriptien Cede Security CLass Itorage Leestim Lacelien Reference 161 01/2811988 2/50 Lot LIne Adjustment 2750 20312 0018 Film 3821N1AIXIOl Group I 161/120rrhe Vault 161 08/0]/1988 2162 Lot LIne Adjustment 2762 20312 0018 Film 3821N1.a.-nO0__l Group i t61/120rfhe Vault " 161 08/10/1988 2/86 Lot Line Adjustment 2786 20312 0018 Film 3821NIAO001 Group I 161/120rrhe Vault 161 08/11/1988 2790 Lot Line Adjustment 2790 20)12 0018 Film 3821111A0001 Group [ 161/120/The Vault 161 09/06/1988 2719 Lot Line Adjustment 2719 20312 0818 FtLm 3821N1AOOOl Gro~ I 161/120/The Vault 161 09/27/1988 ~ Lot Line Adjustment 2823 20312 0018 FILm 3821HI-A---nO01 Group I 161/12Q/The Vault 161 09/27/1988 2831 Lot Line Adjustment 2631 20312 Q018 FILm 3821NIAOOO1 Group I 161/12Q/The Vault 161 10/28/1988 28~1 Lot Line Adjustment 28~1 20112 0018 Film ~821N1AO001 .~ Gro~ I 161/120/1'he VauLt 1~ 10/31/1988 2851 Lot Line Adjustment 2851 20312 0018 Film 3821N1N)001 '- Group ! 161/120rrhe vault 161 12/13/1988 2883 Lot Line Adjustment 2883 20112 0018 Film 3821N1A0001 Grotq~ ! 161/120//he Vault 161 12/23/1~88 288~ Lot Line Adjustment 288/, 20112 0018 Ftle 3821N1A0001 Group ! 161/120/The Vault 161 12/23/1988 2886 Lot Line Adjustment 2886 20312 0018 Film 3821NtA0001 Group I 161/120/The Vault 161 01/0~/1;8~ 28~5 Lot Line Adjustment 285 20312 0018 Film Group ] 161/120rrhe Vault 161 01111/1989 2905 Lot Line Adjustment 2905 20312 Q018 FILm 3821Rt.a--nO0__1 Group I 161/12Q/The Vault 161 Q2/0]/1989 2906 Lot Line Adjustment 2906 20312 Q018 FILm 3821N1AOQOl Group z 1611120rrhe vault 161 02/17/1989 2996 Lot Line Adjustment 2996 20312 QQ18 Film 3821NIAOOO1 Group Z 161/120/The Vault 16~--05/04/1989 3016 Lot LIne Adjustaunt 3016 20312 QQ18 Film 3821N1AOOOl Group ! 161/120/The Vault 161 05/18/1989 3028 Lot Line Adjuslamnt 3028 20312 0018 FILm 3821Nt',_n~O__l Group I 161/120rr~ Vault RROESTY...RIt061 City of TEecalm Page 7 03/I)711999 FILe Reedy far Imtructlen lh44818 Doc. Item Rat. File Reference # Storage leedie Ref. Date Re/. Brief hecrlptim Cede lecurity CLue Starage Lacetime Leestime lofk / 161 0~/0~/198~ 3038 Lot Line Adjatment )038 20~¶2 0018 FILl 3821NIAO001 Group ! 161/120/Teh Vault 161 0?/07/1089 3065 Lot Line Adjustment 3065 26312 Q018 FILl 3821NIAOOO1 SEx; Z 161/120/Th, Vault " 161 07/10/1989 3061 Lot Line Adjustment 3061 20312 QQ18 FILe 3821N1AiXX)l Group ! 161/120/The Vault 161 09/21/1989 )1IX Lot Line Adjustment 3104 20312 0018 Fitl 3821N1AO001 Groq; ! 161/120frhe Vault 161 10/20/1989 3039 Lot Line Adjustment 3039 20512 0018 FILl 3821NIAOQQI Group i 1611120/The Vault 161 1012511989 3129 Lot Line Adjustment 3¶29 20312 0018 Fitl 3821N1AIX)01 Group I 1611120/The Vault 161 10/31/1989 3128 Lot Line Adjustment 3128 20312 0018 FILl 3821N1AOQ01 Group i 161/12Q/The Vault 161 11/14/1989 3169 Lot Line Adjustment 3169 20312 0018 FILl 3821111A0001 Groq~ I 161/120/The Vault 161 11/22/1989 30~0 Lot Line Adjustment 3{XO 20312 0018 Fill ~821N1AO001 Group i 161/120/The Vault 161 11/22/1989 3151 Lot Line Adjustment 3151 20312 0018 FILl 38211llAQ001 Group Z 161/12Q/The Vault 161 12/07/1989 3170 Lot Line Adjustmet 3170 20312 0018 FILI 3E1N1AO001 Group ] 161/12Q/The Vault 161 12/13/1989 3171 Lot Line Adjustment 3171 20312 0018 Film 3821N1AOOO1 Group I 161/120frhe Vault 161 12/1811989 31~ Lot Line Adjustment 31/~ 20312 0018 FiLe 38~lNIAOO01 Groq= I 161/1ZO/The Vault 161 12/1911989 3252 Lot Line Adjustment 3252 20312 0018 FILl 3821rlAOQQ1 Group i 161/120/The Vault 161 12/19/1989 3253 Lot Line Adjustment 3253 20312 0018 Fi Lm Greup Z 161/120/The Vault 161 12/29/1989 3108 Lot Line Adjustment 3108 20312 0018 FILl 3821N1AOQ01 Grm4} I 1611120/The Vault 161 01/18/1990 3188 Lot Line Adjustment 3188 20312 0018 FILl 3821Nl-s---ndXq- Group I 1611120frhe Vault 161 03/0311990 3199 Lot Line Adjustment 3195 2g)12 0018 FILl 3821N1ROOOl Group i 1611120/The Vault UDESTY..,Im061 City ef TiLe Pile 8 15/0T/1995 FiLe Reedy fer eastreich 11:&&:18 D/~ ]tee let. FiLe Reference it Store lledle It / Date let. Brief Description C~b kcurity CLass Storage Location LEtion leference 161 03/13/199Q 32&0 Lot Line Adjustment 32&Q 29312 Q018 FiLm 3821N1JIQQ1 Group Z 161/120/Th, VauLt 161 0~/02/1990 1 Lot Line Adjustment 1 20312 0018 FiLm )821N1AQOOl Group Z 161/120/The VauLt 161 07/18/1990 3 Lot Line Adjustment 3 20312 0018 FiLm 3821NIAOO01 Grme ! 161/120/The VauLt 161 08/14/1990 2 Lot Line AdJusment 2 Z0312 0018 FiLm 3821N1AO001 Group ! 161/120/The VauLt 161 08/17/1990 8 Lot Line AdJament 8 20312 0018 FILm 3821N1AOO01 G~o~ ] 161/120/The VauLt t61 08/23/1990 7 Lot LZne AdjustREnt 7 20312 0018 FiLm 38~1NIAO001 Group I 161/120/The VauLt 161 10/02/1990 5 Lot Line Adjustment 5 20312 0018 FiLm 3821N1A(X)01 Group ! 161/120/The VauLt 161 10/12/1990 10 Lot Line Adjustamnt 10 20312 0018 FiLm /~- Group [ 161/120/The VauLt ~l . ...................................................... : ...... 1~ |0/31/1990 9 Lot Line Adjustment 9 20312 0018 FiLm 3821NIAO001 Group ! 161/120/The VauLt 161 11/29/1990 1~ Lot Line Adjusment 1) 20312 0018 FiLm ~821NIAO001 Group [ 161/120/The VauLt 161 12/18/1990 4 Lot Line Adjustment 4 20312 0018 FiLm 3821NIAO001 Group ! 161/120/The VauLt 137 Records Processed RROESTY...IIRO61 City ef TeamcaLm Doc. net ......... 161 Paee 03/07/1995 Fitera Reedy for eeetructlem latention Code... ZOSa6 118~rf:SS Destruction Date..0~/I)1/1995 Doc. Item let. FiLe Reference # Storage Mia Ref. Date Bet. Brief I)eecriptlen Code Security CLIo8 Storage Location Location Raft 161 01/19/1988 10376 PLot PLan 103/6 2032& Q012 FILm 3821NIAQO61' Group X 161/120/The FILm 161 06/08/1988 10379 PLot PLan 10579 2032& 0017 film 3821NIAOOOl Group I 161112Q/The VauLt 161 Q?/26/1989 11650 PLot PLan 116S0 20324 0912 FILm Group Z 161/1ZO/The VauLt 161 08/09/1989 0325 PLot PLan Z0326 (XX)6 FiLm 3821N1AOOO1 _. Group X 161/120rrhe VauLt 161 08/10/1989 11436 PLot PLan 11436 20326 0312 FiLm 3aZlN1AOOOl Group t 161/1zorrhe vault 161 08/16/1989 115~1 PLot PLan 11561 Z0324 QOlZ FILm 3821N1AOOOl Group ! 161/120/The VauLt 161 08/16/1; 11629 PLot PLan 11629 20324 0012 FiLm 3821N1AO001 Group I 161/120/The VauLt ............................................. ~ ............. ~ ...... 161 08/16/1; 11637 PLot PLan 11637 20326 0012 FiLm 3821141A0001 Group t 161/120/The VauLt 161 08/16/1989 11661 PLot PLan 11661 20324 0012 FiLm 3821WIAO001 ' Group ! 161/120/The VauLt 161 08/21/1989 116)9 PLot PLan 11639 20326 0012 FiLm 38ZIN1AO001 Group t 161/120/The VauLt 161 08/2)/1; 11/~2 PLot PLan 114~2 20326 0012 FiLm 3821N1AO001 Group I 161/120/The VauLt 161 08/25/1989 11/.47 PLot PLan 11/,47 20326 0012 FiLm 3821Nl-a---nO0-1 Group ! 161/120/The VauLt 161 08/25/1989 11/.49 PLot PLan 11/.49 20324 O01Z FiLm 3821NIAOO01 Group Z 161/120rrhe vault 161 08/z5/1989 11456 PLot PLan 11656 20326 0012 FiLm 3821NIAO001 Group Z 161/120/The VauLt · 161 09/01/1989 11665 PLot PLan 11665 20324 Q012 FiLm 3821N1AX)QOl Group t 161/lzOrrhe vault 161 09/05/1989 11502 PLot PLan 11502 Z0324 Q012 FILm 3821N1AQQQ1 Group ! 161/12Q/The VauLt 161 09/12/1989 11677 PLot PLan 11677 20326 0012 FiLm 3821NIAO001 Group ] 161/120rrhe VauLt 161 09/12/1989 9926 PLot PLan 9926 2032& 0012 FiLe 3821N1AO001 Group ! 161112Q/The VauLt RRDESTY...RR061 City of TemecuLo Page 03/07/1995 FiLm Ready for Destruction lh27:53 ~ item Rot. FiLe Reference II Store Nedi8 R, Date Ref. Brief Description Cede Security CLass Storage Location Location leference 161 09/18/1; 11566 PLot PLan 115&6 20326 0012 FiLm 3821NIAO001 Group I 161/120/The VauLt 161 09/19/1989 11499 PLot PLan 11499 20326 0012 FILm 3821N1NXX)l Group z 161/12Q/The Vault 161 09/20/1989 11495 PLot PLan 11&95 2032& 0012 Film 3821NIA0001 Groke I 161/120/The VauLt 161 09/20/1989 11511 PLot PLan 11511 20324 Q01Z FILm 3aaIN1AOOOl Gr~ t 161/1;O/The Vault 161 09/20/1989 11513 PLot PLan 11513 ;0326 Q012 Film ~821N1AOOOl . Group Z 161/120/The Vault 161 09/25/1989 11562 PLot PLan 11562 20326 Q012 Film ~a21N1AOOOl Group Z 161/120/The Vault 161 09/26/1989 11505 PLot PLan 11505 20326 Q012 Film Group z 161/12Q/The Vault ........................................................... -~ ...... 161 09/26/1989 11522 PLot PLan 11522 20324 0012 Film 3821N1.L_n~_1 Group ! 161/120/The Vault ~ . 1~ 09/27/1989 11514 PLot PLan 11514 20326 Q012 Film 3821NIAQ(X)l : Group i 161/120/the Vault 161 09/27/1989 11526 PLot PLan 115~6 20324 Q012 Film 3821N1AiX)Q1 Group i 161/120/The Vault 161 09/27/1989 11527 PLot PLmn 11527 20324 Q012 Film 3a~INIAOOOl Group i 161/12Q/The Vault 161 09/28/1989 11531 PLot PLan 11531 20326 Q012 FILm 3821NIAOO01 Group I 161/l~O/The VeuLt 161 09/;9/1909 11551 PLot PLan 11567 20326 0012 Film 3821Nl-A---n~-1 Group I 161/120/The Vault 161 10/01/1989 11518 PLot PLan 11518 20326 Q012 Film ~821H1AOQ01 Group Z 161/12Q/The Vault 161 10/02/1989 115~ PLot PLan 11544 20~24 0012 Film 3821NIA0001 Group i 161/120/The Vault 161 10/06/1989 11545 PLot PLan 11555 20326 Q012 Film 3821NIAQ001 Group I 161/120/The Vault 1~--~,10/06/1989 11520 PLot PLan 11520 20326 0012 FiLm 3821NIAO001 Group ! 161/120/The VauLt 161 10/10/1989 11542 PLot PLan 11552 2032A 0012 Film 3821NIA0001 Group ! 161/120/The Vault WQESTY...RIt061 City of TmecuL8 Page 05/07/1995 FILem lady far 9eftructlen lh27:53 Doc. Item Bet. FiLe Reference # 8forage Nedis Bet. Dote Bet. Brief Description Cede Security GLees Itorage Location Lention late, 161 10/10/1989 919& Not Nan 919/, 203~ QQ(X FIre 3821NIN)Q01 Group i 161/120/The V~Jtt 161 1011311989 115~6 PLot PLan 11536 2Q32& 0012 FILe 3821N1AOQ01 Group I 1611120/The Veutt " 161 t0113/1989 11538 PLot PLan 11538 2(3326 Q012 Film 3821N1~n99-1 QPoup ! 161/12Q/The VmJLt 161 10/16/1989 11556 PLot PLan 11556 ~32& 0012 Film 3821NIAO001 Group I 161/1ZO/The Vault 161 10116/1989 11557 PLot PLan 11557 20326 Q012 FILm 3821N1AQQQ1 Group i 161112Q/The Vault 161 10118/1989 115~8 PLot PLan 11548 Z0326 QQIZ FILm · 3821N1AQ(X)1 Group I 161/1Z0/The Vault 161 1011811989 11593 PLot PLan 11593 20326 0012 File 3821N1A0(01 Sro~ T 16111ZQ/The Vmutt 161 10/18/1989 11635 PLot PLan 11635 zo326 QQIZ Film 38Z1N1-A-~-n991~ Group z 161/120/The Vault 161 10125/1989 1157~ PLot PLan 11572 2032& 0012 FILm 3821NIAQO01 GPoup I 161/1ZO/The Vault 161 1012611; 11566 PLot Plan 11566 ZQ3Z& (X)IZ FILm 3821NIAQ001 Group I 161/120/The Vault 161 10130/1989 11571 PLot PLan 11571 ZQ32& Q012 FILm 3821N1A0001 Group I 161/lZO/The Vault 161 10/3111989 11608 PLot PLan 11608 20526 Q012 FILm 3821NIAOOO1 Group I 1611120/The Vault 161 11/01/1989 116~ PLot PLan 1160& 2Q32& 0012 Film ~821NIAO001 Group I 1611120/The Vault 161 1110711989 11610 PLot PLan 11610 2032& Q012 FILm 3821N1AQQQ1 sroup ! 161/1ZO/th, Vault 161 1110111989 11611 PLot PLan 11611 Z0326 0012 FILm 3821NIAOOOl Group I 161/lZO/Th, Vmutt 161 11107/1989 11624 PLot PLan 11624 Z0326 0012 FILm 38ZlN1AOQO1 GPoup z 161/lZO/th, Veutt 161 11/09/1989 116O7 PLot PLan 11607 Z0326 Q012 FILm 38ZlN1AOOO1 --"~ Group ! 161/lZO/Th, Vault 161 11/15/1989 116Z0 PLot Plan 11620 Z0326 Q012 FILm 38211rlAQ001 ~oup t 161/1ZO/Th, Vault RiIDESTY...RR061 City of TemscuLe Peee A 03/07/1995 Files Reedy for Destruction 11:27:53 De/''_` Its Rat. File Reform II Storage 14edia Re ,, Date Ref. Brief Description Code Security CLass Storage Location LEtion Reference 161 11/20/1989 11609 Plot PLan 11609 2032& 0012 FILm 3821NIA0001 -, Grotel 161/120/The Vault 161 11/21/1989 11622 Plot PLan 11622 2032& 0012 Film 3821NIA0001 Group I 161/120/The Vault 161 11/29/1989 1164~ PLot PLan 116&& ZOO2& 0012 Ftim 38Z1111AIX)01 Group ! 161/120/The Vault 161 11/30/1989 116~2 PLot PLan 11e42 20~26 0012 Film 3821N1A0001 Grote I 161/120/The Vault 161 11/30/1989 1165& PLot PLan 11654 20326 0012 Film 3821NIA0001 Group i 161/120/The Vault 161 11/30/1989 1168~ PLot PLan 1168& 20)26 0012 Film )821111A0001 Group i 161/120/the Vault 161 12/01/1989 11710 PLot PLan 11710 2G$26 001) film 3821N1AO001 G~oup I 161/120rrhe Vault 161 12/05/1989 5702 PLot PLan 5702 20326 0011 File )821NIA0001 ./__ Group ! 161/120/The Vault 16. .2/08/1; 11665 PLot PLan 11665 2032& 0012 Film )821N1AOG01 Group i 161/120/The Vault 161 12/08/1989 11666 PLot PLan 11666 20~26 0012 Film 3821NIAO001 Group ! 161/120/The Vault 161 12/08/1989 11697 PLot PLan 11697 20~2& 001) film ~821NIAO001 Grc&; i 161/120/The Vault 161 12/11/1989 11669 PLot PLan 11669 20326 0012 Film 3821141A0001 Group ! 161/120/the Vault 161 12/13/1989 11681 PLot PLan 11681 20326 0012 Film 3821H1AO001 Group i 161/120/The Vault 161 12/18/1989 11688 plot plan 11688 20)26 001) file )821141A0001 Group i 161/120/the vault 161 12/19/1969 11721 PLot PLan 11721 20326 001) file 3821l!1A0001 Group i 161/120/The Vault 161 12/19/1989 11722 PLot PLan 11722 20326 0013 file )821141A0001 Group i 161/120/The Vault 16~'~1/01/1990 11720 PLot PLan 11720 20~.& 001) film 3821141A0001 Group ! 161/120/The Vault 161 01/09/1990 11720 PLot PLan 11720 20~2& 0013 film ~821N1AO001 Group t 161/120/The Vault IIDESTY...IIR061 City of TamreaLm Pale 03/0711995 FILe leeely for Destruction 11s27z53 Doc. Ztem let. FILe Reference · Store Ibdto Re/. Date lef. Brief Description Code lecurlty CLue Storage Location Lotion 161 01/10/1990 11685 PLot Nan 11685 2052& 0012 FILm 3821WIA~i Grme Z 161/120/The VauLt 161 01/10/1990 11742 PLot PLan 11742 2([52& 0013 fitB 3821NIAO001 Group I 161/120/The VauLt ; 161 01/10/1990 11743 Not PLan 11763 2Q326 0013 film 3821NIAOQ01 Group ! 161/12Q/The VauLt .............................................................. .--- 161 01/12/1990 11731 PLot PLan 11731 2Q324 0013 film 3821NIAOO01 Group I 161/120/The VauLt 161 01115/199Q 11730 PLot PLan 117~Q 20~2& 0013 film 3821N1A(X)Q1 Group t 161/12Q/The VauLt 161 ol/16/199o 11736 PLot PLan 11736 7032A 0013 film ~aZ1NIAOO01 Group I 161/12Q/The VauLt 161 01/19/1990 11750 PLot PLan 11750 2Q32& 0013 film 3821NIAO001 Group I 161/120/The VauLt ........................................................... ~ ...... 161 01/20/1990 11761 PLot PLan 11761 2Q324 0013 film 3821NIAO001 Group I 161/12Q/The VauLt 161 01/22/1990 117~ PLot PLan 11744 20324 0013 film 3821NIAQOQ1 '- Group i 161/120/The VauLt 161 ol/23/1990 11765 PLot PLan 11765 20~24 0013 film 3821N1A0001 Group ! 161/12Q/The VauLt 161 01/75/1990 11756 PLot PLea 11756 20324 0013 film 3821N1AOOO1 Group ! 161/12Q/The VauLt 161 Q1/23/199Q 11757 PLot PLan 11757 2032& 0013 film 3821N1AOOO1 Group i 161/12Q/The VauLt 161 01/29/1990 11759 PLot PLan 11759 20324 0013 film 3821N1AQOQ1 Qroup ! 161/12Q/The VauLt ............................................................ 161 Q1/)Q/199Q 11752 PLot PLan 11752 20324 0013 film 3821NIAQ(X)l QrcAe I 161/120/Th, VauLt 161 02/05/1990 11767 PLot PLan 11767 2032& 0013 film a821N1AOOOl Group z 161/120/The VauLt 161 02/05/1990 11772 PLot PLan 11772 2032& 0013 film 3821N1AQOQ1 Group ! 161112Q/The VauLt 161 02/08/1990 11783 PLot PLan 11783 2037A 0013 film 3821NIAQO01 Group ! 161/120/The VauLt 161 02/13/1990 11786 PLot PLan 11786 20324 0013 film 3821N1A(X)01 Group i 161/120/The VauLt ILeESTY...RR061 City of Talecute Page 6 66/07/1995 Fi Lee Ready for Destruction 11:27:53 D//'~ item Itet. FILe Reference · Storage lieclio R~ ' Date lef. Brief Description Code Security CLams Storage Location Leration lieferN 161 02/21/199Q 11801 PLot PLan 11801 Z(X326 QQ13 film 3821N1AOO01 Gro~ ! 1~1/120/The Vault 161 02/22/199Q 11819 PLot PLan 11819 2032& QQ13 film 3821NIAQQ01 Group z 161/1~0/Th, Vault : 161 02/Z3/1990 11808 PLot PLan 118O8 2662& QQ13 film 3821N1AOOOl Qroq~ I 161/120/The Vault 161 02/26/1990 11811 PLot PLan 11811 ~66~& 0013 film 3821NIAOOOl Group i 161/120/The VauLt 161 02/26/1990 11812 PLot PLan 11812 20326 0013 film 3821N1AOO01 Group I 161/120/The VauLt 161 02/26/1990 11817 PLot PLan 11817 2032& 0013 film 3821NIAO001 Groq) ! 161/120/The VauLt 161 02/26/1990 11820 PLot PLan 11820 2032& 0013 film 3821NIAO001 Group ! 161/120/7he VauLt 161 02/28/1990 1181& PLot PLan 1181& 2032& 0013 film 3821N1AO001 ~ Group ! 161/120/The VauLt 16. ,2/28/1990 11815 PLot PLan 11815 2032& 0013 film 3821NIAOO01 ' Group i 161/120/The VauLt 161 03/01/1990 11827 PLot PLan 11827 2032& 0013 film 3821NIAO001 Gro~ ! 161/120/The VauLt 161 03/01/1990 118~0 PLot PLan 118~0 2032& 0013 film 3821NIAO001 Group L 161/120/The VauLt 161 03/01/1990 11922 PLot PLan 11922 2032& 0013 film 3821N1AO001 Group i 161/120/The VauLt 161 03/08/1990 11876 PLot PLan 11876 2032& 0013 film 3821N1AOQ01 Group ! 161/1~Q/The Vault 161 03/09/1990 11858 PLot PLan 11858 2662~ 0013 film 3821NIAQOOl Group L 161/IZO/Th, Vault 161 66/13/1990 11859 PLot PLan 118~9 ZOX& 0013 film Gro~ t 161/1~0/Th, Vault 161 03/15/1990 1186~ PLot PLan 1186~ ~03~ QO13 film 2821Nl-A.__a~_ Group X 16111ZQ/The VeuLt 16~,~3/16/1990 11867 PLot PLan 11867 2662~ QQ13 film ~E1NIAOOOl Group ! 161/126/The Vault 161 03/19/1990 11723 PLot PLan 11/23 20324. oo13 film 3E~INtAOOOl Group Z 161/lZ0/Th, Vault m)ESTY...nn0~l city ef TmecuLe Page 7 0310711995 FILe Reedy for Destruction 11:27:53 Doc. item Ret. FiLe Reference · Bterage Nedis " Ref, Date Ref, Brief Description Cock Security CLass Storage Location Location Itefe. 161 03/19/199Q 11865 PLot PLan 11865 ~Q3~A QQ1) film ]8~INtAQQQ~ Group I 161/l~O/The VauLt 161 03/19/1990 11905 PLot PLan 11905 Z037~ 0013 film !INIAOOOl Gr~4~ I 161/120/The VauLt 161 03/21119g0 11895 PLot PLan 11895 20326 001:3 film 3821N1AOOOl Grcs4~ Z 161/120/The VauLt 161 03/27/1990 11886 PLot PLan 11886 Z(X3~ Q013 file 38~1NIAQQQ1 Group i 161/120/The Vault 161 03/Z7/1990 1189~ PLot PLan 1189& 2032& 0013 rite 3821N1AIXX)l Grot~ I 161/120/The Vault 161 03/28/1990 1188A PLot PLan 118M 2032A 001:3 file 3821N1AQO01 Group ! 161/120/The Vault 161 03/Z9/1990 6 PLot PLan 4 2032/, 001:3 file 3821N1AOO01 Group ! 161/12Q/The Vault 161 04/03/1990 11927 PLot PLan 11927 20326 0013 file 3821NIAOO01 Group I 161/120/The VauLt 161 04/03/1990 6 PLot PLan 6 ZO37.& 001:3 file 3821NIAO001 / Gro~ I 161/120/The VauLt 161 0~/09/1990 5 PLot PLan 5 ~Q3~ QQ13 film 38~lN1AQQ01 Group ! 161/12Q/The Vault 161 04/10/1990 10 PLot PLan 10 ~03Z~ QQ13 file 38~lNIAOOO1 Group ! 161/1201The Vault. 161 04/13/1990 7 PLot PLan 7 20326 QQ13 film ]8~IN1AQOQ1 Group i 161/120rrhe VauLt 161 04/19/1990 19 PLot PLan 19 ~032/. QQI~ file ~8~1N1~--n~01 Group I 161/12Q/The Vault 161 04/20/1990 8 PLot PLan 8 203~6 0013 file I1NIAQOQ1 Group z 161/1~O/The Vault 161 0412011990 9 PLot PLan 9 ~Q3~A QQ13 file 38~lNIA(XX)l Group I 161/1~Q/The Vault 161 04/Z7/1990 18 PLot PLan 18 ~Q3Z6 Q016 film ~IN1AOOOl Group ! 161/l~O/The Vault 161 04127/1990 20 PLot PLan ~Q ~Q3~ Q016 film 38211rlAOIX)l Group X 161112Q/The Vault 161 05/04/1990 26 PLot PLan 26 203~ QQ16 file ~8~IN1AOOOl Group ! 1611120/1'he Vault ItitDESTY...RR061 City of Teemcute Pa~e 8 03/0711995 FiLe Ready for Oestnztfm lh27=53 [y/~ Item let. FiLe Reference # Store Nedis k Date Ref. Brief Description Code Security CLass ItoreOe Lecetien Leeattee Reference 161 05/Qa/199Q 29 PLot PLan 29 2(3326 0016 film 3821N1AQQQI sroup i 161/120/The Vault 161 05/111199Q .:52 PLot PLan 32 2032& QQ16 film 3821NIAOQQ1 Group t 161/12Q/The Vault ; 161 05/11/199Q 3& PLot PLan 3& 213326 Q016 ft tm 3821NIAQQQ1 Group z 161/120/The Vault 161 05/16/1990 12QQ9 PLot PLan 12(X)9 2032& Q013 film 3E1N1AOOOl _ 6rot~ i 161/120/The Vault 161 05731/199Q 69 PLot PLan 69 20326 QQ16 fi Lm ~IN1AOQQI Group i 161/120/The vault 161 06/05/1990 193 PLot PLan 193 2032& Q015 Film 3821NIAQ(X)l Group Z 161/120/The Vault 161 QG/161199Q 66 PLot Plan 66 20526 QQ16 fi tm 3821NIAQQ01 Groqp i 161/12Q/The VauLt 161 06/18/1990 90 PLot PLan 90 2032& QQ16 fi Lm 3821NIAQQ01 Group i 161/12Q/The Vault /~ . 1, 06/19/1990 68 PLot PLan 68 20326 0016 film 3821NIAQQQ1 ' Group ! 161/120/The Vault 161 06/20/1990 91 PLot PLan 91 20326 0016 film 3821HIAQQQ1 Grcx,1) I 161/1ZO/The Vault 161 06/21/1990 76 PLot PLan 76 20326 0016 film 3821N1AO001 Group i 161/120/The Vault 161 06/Z2/199Q 76 PLot PLan 76 213326 QQ16 film 3821NIAQ(X)1 Grot~ i 161/120rrhe VauLt 161 06/26/1990 77 PLot PLan 77 20326 0016 film )821NIAO001 Group ! 161/120/The Vault 161 07/02/1990 78 PLot PLan 78 20326 QQ16 film 3821NIAQO01 Group [ 161/120/The Vault 161 07/02/1990 80 PLot PLan 8Q 20326 QQ16 fi Lm 3821NIAOQQI Group ! 161/12Q/The Vault 161 07/03/1990 82 PLot PLan 82 20326 (X)16 film 3821NIAQQQ1 Group X 161/120/The Vault 1/(;,t.----07/05/1990 83 PLot PLan 83 2032& QQ16 ft tm 3821NIAQQQ1 Group i 161/12Q/The VauLt 161 07/06/1990 87 PLot PLan 87 20326 0016 film 3821NIAIX)Q1 Group ! 161/120/The Vault ItROEITY...ILI061 City of Tamecalm Page 0310711995 FI Lee needy fer Dastructlen 11xZT:S3 Doc. Item Bet. File Reference · Store Nedit Ref. Date Bet. Brief kscriptlen" Cede lecurity elm Storage Leestim Leeet|en life, 161 07/11/1990 151 PLot PLan 151 ; 0015 film 3821NIAQO~ Group ! 161/120/The VauLt 161 07/11/1990 95 Plot Plan 95 2032& 0Ol& film 3821N1-A--N~--1 Group I 161/120/The Vault " 161 07/12/1990 1)5 Plot Plan 135 2032/, 0015 film 3821N1A0001 Gro~l) ! 161/120/The VauLt 161 07/12/1990 9/~ Plot PLan ~ 2032& 0016 film 3821N1A0001 Group ! 161/120/The VauLt 161 07/16/199Q 160 PLot PLan 160 20326 Q015 film 3821N1-s---n~-I Group I 161/12Q/The VauLt 161 07/Z3/legQ I?Q PLot PLan 17Q 20326 QQ15 film a821Nl.'._M~__l 6ro~ I 161/12Q/The VauLt 161 07/26/1990 117 PLot PLan 117 20326 Q015 film ~aZlNl.'.~l Group t 161/12Q/The VauLt 161 071261199Q 105 PLot PLan 105 20326 I)1)16 film 382tN1AQQQ1 Group I 161/12Q/The VauLt 161 071261199Q 106 PLot PLan 106 20326 Q014 film 3821,1A0001 Group ! 161/tZO/The VauLt 161 07/26/1990 107 PLot PLan 107 20326 0016 film )821N1AQ(X)1 Group ! 161/120/Tho VauLt 161 07/26/1990 108 PLot PLan 108 20326 QQ16 film )821N1AOOOl Group i 161/120/The VauLt 161 07/27/1990 109 PLot PLan 109 Z0324 0016 film ~1111A0001 Group ! 161/120/The VauLt 161 0712711990 111 PLot PLan 111 2(2326 Q016 film 3821NIAQQQ1 Gro~ ! 161/lZO/The VauLt 161 07/3Q/1990 112 PLot PLan. 112 20326 QQ15 film 3821Nl:__MOl ~roup i 161/120/Th, VauLt 161 08/Q1/1990 2 PLot PLan 2 2032& 0013 film Group ! 161/12Q/The VauLt 161 08/06/1990 116 PLot PLan 116 20326 QO15 film a821N1AOOOl Group ! 161/12Q/The VauLt 161 08/06/1990 119 PLot PLan 119 20326 QQ15 film Sa21NIAOOOl Group ! 161/120/The VauLt 161 08/07/1990 118 PLot PLan 118 20326 0015 film 3821N1AOOOl Group ! 161/120/The VauLt RRDESTY...RR061 City of Teemcute Page 10 03/07/1995 Files Reedy for Destruction 11:21:53 D//''' item let. FILe Reference # Storage liedie R~ J Date Ref. Brief Description Code Security Ctm Store LocBtten Licetim leference 161 08/09/1990 12t) PLot Hen lZQ 2032& Q015 film 3821NIA(X)Q1 Group I 161/l~Q/The Vault 161 08/09/1990 122 PLot PLan 122 2032& Q015 file 3821N1AOOOl Group Z 161/1tO/The Vault 161 o8/1~/1990 125 PLot PLan 125 ~Q37~ Q015 file 36Z1N1._u~_l Qreap ! 161/12Q/The Vault 161 08/1&/1990 126 PLot Nan 126 2032& 0015 file 3821NIN)Q01 Group Z 161/120/The Vault 161 08/1&/1990 1~0 PLot PLan l&O] 2032& 0015 file 3821N1AO001 Group Z 161/120/The Vault 161 Q8/15/1990 128 PLot Ptsn 128 2032& QQ15 film 3821N1AQQQ1 GrcM~ I 161/12Q/The Vault 161 08/15/1990 129 PLot PLea 129 20326 QQ15 film 38~lNIAOOOl Group ! 161/12Q/The Vault 161 08/15/199Q I?1 Plot PLan 171 20326 QQ15 film 3821N1AQOQI ~ Group ! 161/12Q/The Vault 16. d8/16/1990 130 PLot PLan 130 20326 Q015 film 3821MIAQ(X)1 Group ] 161/1tO/The Vault 161 08/20/1990 132 PLot PLan 132 20326 Q015 film 38~lN1AQQOl Group ! 161/120/The Vault 161 08/20/1990 161 PLot PLan t~1 2032~ (X)15 film 3821N1AQOO1 Group ! 161/120frhe Vault 161 08/22/1990 1)~ Plot PLan 1)~ 20326 0015 film 3821Nl-s_n~--1 Group i 161/12Q/The Vault 161 08/22/1990 169 PLot PLan 1A9 2032& 0015 film 3821N1AOO01 Group I 161/120/The Vault 161 0812311990 138 PLot PLan 138 20326 0015 film 3821NIAOO01 Group I 161/120/The Vault 161 08/Z31199Q 139 PLot PLan 139 ~0326 Q015 film 3821NIAQQ01 Group ! 161/12Q/The Vault 161 Q6/23/1990 157 PLot PLan 157 20326 Q015 film 3821NIAQ(X)1 Gro~ ! 161/1~Q/The Viutt 16~--~q8/2~/1990 1~2 PLot PLan 162 ~Q3~ 0015 film 3821NIAOOOl Group ! 161/12Q/The VauLt 161 08/26/199Q 163 PLot PLan 1A3 2032& Q015 film 3821NIAOQQ1 Gr~q~ ~ 161/1~Onhe V~utt RIU)ESTY...RRQ61 City of TeemcaLm Page 11 0;/07/1995 FILOn Reedy for Destruction 11:ZF:53 Doc. Item let. FiLe Referefme · Store Nedle Ref. Date Ref. Brief Description Code lecurlty CLass Storage Location Location lefo / 161 08/2/*/1990 l&& PLot PLan l&& 2032& Q015 film 3821NIA0001 Group I 161/12Q/The VauLt 161 o8/2/*/199o t&6 PLot PLan 1&6 2032& Q015 film 3821NIAOOOl Group I 161/12Q/The VauLt " 161 08/2/*/1990 150 PLot PLan 150 2032& Q015 film 3821N1AOOOl Group ! 161/12Q/The VauLt 161 08/29/1990 152 PLot PLan 152 Z032/* 0815 film 3821NIAOOO1 Gr'o; I 161/120/The VauLt 161 08/29/1990 153 PLot PLan 153 2032& 0815 film 3821N1AOQOI ScaLe Z 161/120/The VauLt 161 08/30/1990 155 PLot PLan 155 2932& Q015 film 3821N1AOOO1 Group I 161/12Q/The vault 161 08/31/199o 156 PLot PLan 156 2032/* Q015 film 3821N1AiX)Q1 Group I 161/12Q/The VauLt 161 08/31/1990 166 PLot PLan 166 2032/* 0015 film 3821N1AOQ01 Group ! 161/120/The VauLt 161 09/C~/1990 158 PLot PLan 158 2032/, 0015 fill 3821NIAO001 · Group I 161/12Q/The VauLt 161 09/06/1990 161 PLot PLan 161 2032/* 0015 fill 3821N1.a.__n~_1 Group I 161/120/The VauLt 161 09/07/1990 162 PLot PLan 162 2032/* 0015 fill 3821N1AO001 Group I 161/120/The VauLt 161 09/07/1990 163 PLot PLan 163 2032/* 0015 film 3821N1AO001 Group I 161/120/The VauLt 161 09/1/*/1990 165 PLot PLan 165 2032/* 0015 film 3821N1AOO01 Group ! 161/120/The VauLt 161 09/19/1990 167 PLot PLan 167 2032/* 0015 fill 3821MIAO001 Group i 161/120/The VauLt 161 09/25/1990 1 PLot PLan 1 2032/* 0013 film 38211fi.a._nd~__1 Group ! 161/120/The VauLt 161 09/26/1990 176 PLot PLan 176 20~.& 0015 film 3821111A0001 Group ! 161/120/The VauLt ................................................................. 161 09/27/1990 17S PLot PLan 17~ 2032/* 0015 film 3821NIA0001 Group i 161/120/The VauLt 161 10/02/1990 17~ PLot PLan 179 2032& 0015 film 3821NIA001 Group ! 161/120/The VauLt EIDEST~...RIt061 CIty of Tmmata M 12 e~/07/1995 FILe leecly for Mtrmien 11s~r~:5~ D/~ ]tee let. FiLe leferm # Storage MIle Rk Date Ref. Brief Description Cede lecurity Ctau Itorage Location Location kferem t61 10/Q~I199Q 189 PLot PLan 189 2032~ QQ15 Film ~821N1AQQQ1 Group ! 161/120/The Vault 161 10/05/1990 2OQ PLot PLan 200 2032& QQ15 film 3821NIAOOOl Group z 1611120/The Vault 161 10/08/1990 190 PLot PLan 190 ~ 0015 FILm 38~llMAQQ01 Group ! 161./1ZO/The Vault 161 10/09/1990 187. PLot PLan 187. 20326 0015 Film 3821N1AO001 Gr(x~ ! 161/12D/The Vault 161 1010911990 188 Plot PLan 188 2032& 0815 Film 3821HIAQQQ1 Group ! 161/12Q/The Vault 161 10/10/1990 183 Plot PLan 183 2032~ QO15 Film 3821mAOOOl Group I 161/120/The Vault 161 10/11/1990 186 PLot Plan 186 20326 0815 Film 3821N1AOOOt GrotF i 161/12Q/The Vault 161 10/11/1990 187 PLot PLan 187 2032~ 0815 Film ~aZ1N1AOOO1 ~ Group i 161/120/The Vault 16. .0/12/1990 195 PLot PLan 195 2032~ QQ15 Film ~821N1AOOO1 Group ] 161/12Q/The Vault 161 10/15/1990 192 PLot PLan 192 20326 0815 Film 3821mAOOO1 Group I 161/120/The Vault 161 10/16/1990 194 PLot PLan 194 20326 QQ15 Film 3821N1___~_1 Group i 161/120/The Vault 161 10/17/1990 201 PLot PLan 201 20326 0815 film 3821N1AOOOl Group Z 161/120/The Vault 161 10/18/1990 199 PLot PLan 199 2052~ QQ15 film 3821,1A0001 Group I 161/120/The Vault 161 10/22/1990 202 PLot PLan 202 2O326 QQ15 film 3821,1A0001 Grot4~ i 161/120/The Vault 161 10/22/199Q 20~ PLot PLan 2iX 20326 QQ15 film r. roqp I 161/120/The Vault 161 10/23/1990 206 PLot PLan 206 20326 0015 film 3821NIAOOO1 Grow i 161/120/The Vault 16~--~D/26/199Q 20? Plot PLan 20? 20326 0815 film 3821N1AOOOl Group ! 161/120/The Vault 161 10/26/1990 213 PLot PLan 213 20326 Q015 film ~aZ1,1AOOOl Group t 161/12Q/The Vault BIU)ESTY,,,RR061 City of Tamecute Pa~e 13 03/07/1995 FiLe leedy.~for Destructlen 11:27:53 Doc. Item let. FiLe Refertrice 18 Itorlge liBdim net, Dote Ref, Brief hicriptlen Code Security CLass Storage LeeeLlen LocBtlon lof~ 161 10/25/1990 209 PLot PLan 209 2032& 0015 fill )821NtAOO01 Groq} ! 161/120/The Vault 161 10/25/1990 210 PLot PLan 210 20324 0015 fi Lm 3821NIAOOOl Qro~ i 1611120frhe vault : 161 10/26/1990 211 PLot PLan 211 2O324 QQ15 fi Lm 3821NIA0001 Group i 161/12Q/The VauLt 161 10/31/1990 217 PLot PLan 217 20324 0016 film 3821NIAOOO1 Groq} I 161112Q/The VauLt 161 11/01/1990 218 PLot PLan 218 20326 0016 fill 3821N1AOOOl Group i 161/120/The VauLt 161 11/02/1990 10866 10866 20326 0017 FiLm 3821N1AO001 Group i 161/120/The VauLt 161 11/08/1990 220 PLot PLan 220 20326 0016 fill 3821NIAO001 Grot; ! 161/12Q/The VauLt 161 11/15/1990 221 PLot PLan 221 2032/* 0016 film 3821N1AOO01 Groqo i 161/120/The VauLt 161 11/19/1F~E) 8~ PLot PLan 86 20324 001/* film 3821NIA0001 / Group i 161/120/The VauLt 161 12/12/1990 225 PLot PLan 223 2032/* 0016 film 3821NIAO001 Groqo i 161/120/The VauLt 161 01/1/*/1991 22/* PLot PLan 22/* 20326 0016 film 3821NIAO001 Group ] 161/120/The VauLt 161 01/17/1991 7.33 PLot PLan 253 ZO326 0016 FiLm 3821NIAOOO1 Group [ 1611120/The VauLt 161 02/0611991 203 PLot PLan 203 2032/, 0015 film 3821t11A001 Group i 161/120/Tho VauLt 161 02/0811991 179 PLot PLan 179 2032/, 0015 film ]BZ1N1AOOOl Group i 161/120rrho VauLt 161 OZIZ211991229 PLot PLan 229 2032/* 0016 FiLm 3821N1AOO01 Group i 1611120/The VauLt 161 03/11/1991 228 PLot PLan 228 20326 0016 FiLm 3821N1AOOOl Group i 1611120rrhe VauLt 161 03/12/1991227 PLot PLan 227 2032/* QQ16 FILm 3821NIA(XX)1 ~ 6ro~ i 161/12Q/The VauLt 161 Q3115/1991 216 PLot PLan 216 20324 Q015 film 3821NIAQQOl Groq; ~ 161/120/The VauLt RRDESTY,,.ILeQ61 City of T/L1 Page 0310711995 Files Reedy far Destruction 11:~r~:$5 ~ item let. FILe Reference I Storage NKIii k Date Ref. Brief Deecrtptiee Cede Security CLass Storage LeeaLien Lecatlen Reference 161 03/20/199122~ PLot PLan 22A 2032& 0016 Fi LB )821NIAiXX)l Group t 161/12Q/The VauLt 161 0~/22/1991 236 PLot PLan 236 20)7~ 0016 Fi Lm 3821N1AOOOl Group ! 161/120/The VauLt 161 0~/25/1991 221 PLot PLan 221 2032& 0016 Fi Lm 3821N1AO001 Group x 161/120/The VauLt 161 0~/29/1991 220 PLot PLan 230 2032/* 0016 FiLm SBZlNl.'.__nO0_l Group I 161/120/Tho VauLt 161 05/06/1991 222 PLot PLan 222 2032/* 0016 FiLm )821N1AOOOl Group Z 161/120nhe vault 161 05/29/1991 225 PLot PLan 225 2032& 0016 FiLm S821N1AOOOl Group ! 161/120/The VauLt 161 O6/1/*/1991 238 PLot PLan 238 2032/, 0016 FiLm 3821N1AOOOl Group i 161/120/The VauLt 161 O6/17/1991 239 PLot PLan 229 2O32/* 0016 FiLm 3821N1AOOOl Group Z 161/lZO/The VauLt ....................................................... *_ ...... 1, ~8/06/1991 2/*0 PLot PLan 2/*Q 2032/* 0016 FiLm 3821N1AQQQ1 Group I 161/120/The VauLt 161 08/09/1991 2/.1 PLot PLan 2/.1 2032/* 0016 FiLm )821N1AOOOl Group Z 161/1;O/The VauLt 161 11/0~/1991 2/.3 PLot PLan 2/*3 2032/* 0017 FiLm 3BZlK1Aoool GroLe ! 161/120/The VauLt 161 11/25/1991 2/*2 PLot PLan 242 2032/* 0017 FiLm 3821N1AOOOl Group i 1611120/The VauLt 161 02/21/1992 2/~ PLot PLan 2A/, 2032/* 0017 FiLm ~821Nt~_n~O_l Group ! 161/1;O/The VauLt 161 06/17/1992 225 PLot PLan 225 2032/* 0016 FiLm )B;1NtAOOOl Gro~q~ i 1611120/Th, VauLt 161 Q?/15/1992 2/*5 PLot PLan 2/*5 203~ 0017 Fi Lm )821N1A0001 Group Z 161/120/The VauLt 161 07/15/199Z Z~6 PLot PLan 2~6 2032/* 0017 FiLm 38Z1N1AQ001 Group i 161/1;O/The VauLt 1(~----07/30/1992 2/,? PLot PLan 2/*7 2032/* 0017 film ~a21N1A0001 GrCN4~ I 161/lZO/The VauLt 161 08/19/199Z 2/*9 PLot PLan 2/*9 20326 0017 film )aZIHIA0001 Group i 161/120/The VauLt RRDESTY...IRQ61 City of Teacute Pale 15 Q3/Q?/1995 FIre. Reedy for Detr~tion 11 Do¢. tim let. FiLe Reference # Store~e Nedte Ref. Dete Ref. Brief Deecrlptlan' Code Security elm Storage L~catlen Locitim lef~ / 161 10/13/1992 2&8 PLot PLan 2&8 2032& 0017 FILl 3821NIAOOOt' Group ! 161/12Q/The VauLt 253 Records Processed ITEM 7 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY ~OF 'r]~MECULA, RECITING THE FACT OF ~ SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ADVISORY ELvCTION HELD ON MARCH 7, 1998, DECI2kRING ~ ~T AND SUCH OTHER MA~ AS PROVIDED BY LAW WHl4;lfl?,A,~, a Special Municipal Advisory Election was held and conducted in the City of Temectfia, C~llfornia, on Tuesday, March 7, 1995, u required by hw; and WHEREAS, notice of the election was given in time, form and manner as provided by law; that voting precincts were properly established; that election officers were appointed and that in all respects the election was held and conducted and the votes were cast, received and-- canvassed and the returns made and declared in time, form and manner as required by the provisions of the Elections Code of the State of California; and ,. WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 94-116, adopted December 7, 1994, the County Election Department canvassed the returns of the election and on March 14, 1995 certified the results to this City Council, the restfits are received, attached as "Exhibit A., NOW TI~REFORE, ~ CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETER.MINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the whole number of ballots cast in the City was 8,187. Section 2. That the measur~ voted upon at the election is as follows: Measure "B" - Advisory Vote - Old Town Entertainment Center Section 3. That the number of votes given at each precinct and the number of votes given in the city for and against the measure were as in the Registrar-Recorders Certification listed in Exhibit *A* attached. Section 4. That as a restfit of the election, a majority of the voten voting on Measure 'B' relating to the Old Town Entertainment Center for the City of Temectfia, did vote in favor of it, and that the measure was carried, and shall be deemed adopted and ratified. Section S. The City Clerk shall enter on the records of the City Council of the City, a statement of the restfit of the election, showing: (1) The whole number of ballots cast in the City; (2) The measure voted upon; (3) The number of votes given at each precinct to each person, and for and against the measure; (4) The Wtal number of votes for an against the measure. P,~.~os~55 I Section 6. The City Clerk shah certify the adoption of this resolution. APPRO~ AND ADOFrED, thi~ 28th day of March, 1995. ATT~T: Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor June S. Or~k, City Clerk [SEPAL) R~os~55 2 STATE OF C~,L~ORNIA) coxnq~r ox= ~n~ ss crryox~Ts~mLr~7_~ ) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of time City of Temecula, FrI~-~Y DO CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. ~- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of '-the Ci~ of Temec-ls on the 28th day of March, 199~ by the following roll call vole. COUN~~mERS: NOES: ABSENT: COUNcrLMI~MBERS: COUNt: June S. Greek, City Clerk ResoeLS5 3 if, XiIIBtT A COUNTY OF R~VERSHDE COUNTY CLERK-RECORDER, REGISTRAR JAME~ E. BRIDGi~ CHIEF DEPUTY REGISTRAR IN, lima E. Frlnco ~ 1260 Palmyma Avenue River~Oe. CA 92507-~ 70;, t909) 275,8700 FAX 1909~ 275-8733 CERTIFICATE OF REGISTRAR OF VOTERS TO THE RESULTS OF THE CANVASS OF ELECTION RETURNS State of California) )ss. County of Riverside ) I, DELFINA E. FRANCO, Chief Deputy Registrar of Voters of said County, do hereby certify that, in pursuance of the provisions of Sections 307 and 15301 of the California Elections Code and the resolution adopted by the City Council, I did canvass the returns of the vote cast at the Special Municipal Advisory Election held on ~ 7, 1995 in the CITY OF TEMECULA and I further certify that the statement of votes cast, to which this certificate is attached, shows the whole number of votes cast for and against Measure B which was submitted to a vote of the voters, at said election in said City and in each precinct therein, and that the totals as shown for and against said measure are full, true and correct. Dated this 14th day of March, 1995 FRANK K. JOHNSON COUNTY CLERK-RECORDER, REGISTRAR Chief Deputy ~ of Vote~ · · s, · 0 I I I ITEM 8 FROM: ' DATE: SUBJECT: AFFROVAT- CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City.Engineer March 28, 1995 Contract Change Order No. I for FY94-95 Slurry Seal Project, Project. No. PW94-12 PREPARED BY: ~,Brad Buron, Maintenance Superintendent RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve Contract Change Order No. I for materials, labor and equipment for various items of work in the amount of e10,721.30. BACKGROUND: During the construction of the FY94-95 Slurry Seal Project, the following item of work has resulted in a change to the contract. The Contract Change Order is as follows: CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. I After reevaluating the project scope of work for the project, there were some areas that needed a slurry seal coating but were not included in the original scope of work. Therefore, by adding these new slurry seal areas to the project, there would be a substantial savings to the City by doing the work now and we can protect these areas from further pavement deterioration. TOTAL: $ 28,715.39 FISCAL IMPACT: On October 18, 1994 the City Council awarded a contract for the construction of FY94-95 Slurry Seal Project to Roy Allan Slurry Seal, Inc. for $179,940.89. Contract Change Order No. 1 is in the amount of $28,715.39 which is $10,721.30 over the projects contingency. Therefore, an additional $10,721.30 must be approved for the FY94-95 Slurry Seal Project, and adequate funds are available in the Public Works Department, Routine Street Maintenance Budget Account #100-164-601-5402. Attachment Contract Change Order No. I r:~agdrpt~95M)328~w94-12.ood,jp ~T BY: 0-22-M; 9:47AN; CITY 0F ~- .City_ of T rn cul 43174 BuSiness Park DrA,~ * l'emccuZa. Ca2brrUa 92590 Fyta4-ge N,.rrv 8e,I Pr~r-t ;# 2/2 Rov Aller~ Rllarrv em"l. Ir~. 694-1989 · FAX (9091 694-1999 CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER N0. 1 CONTRACT NO, PW94,-12 SHEET _1_ of ..1_ TO CONTRACTOR: NOT~ This ~hange oral Jr b m effective until aforoved bv the Fp-lneer. CNANGE REQUE81'ED BY: Br~d Buron, Maintenance Superintendent OR An INCREASF in thee following ~tems: :. { Alter reevalueting the ,qcope of work for the project, there were some areas that needed a slurry seal caatlno but ware not included in the original scope of work. Therefore, bY adding these new alurry Hal area8 to the project, there wouid be substantial Savings to the City by doing the work now and we can protect these areas from further!pavement deterioration. TOTAL: 4;28,716.39 .............................. $ 179,940.89 .............................. $ 197,93¢,98 .............................. $(+)10,121.30 .............................. $ 208,656.28 Original Contrg~ Ar~ount .. Adjusted Contract Amount ,. Change Order No, 1 , ...... Total Contract AmOunt ..... Adjustment of Calendar Days ~ ................... ,, ........... Approved; Meint:. Superinterident By: .__~-,~ ~./~"'--,L_ Date: WE t~ ~dg~ ~n~act0r ~ve ~V~ cKoM ~jd~ ~ tM C~ ~Opo~ a~ ~eby ~Mal is approve. ht we w;U ;rovFde at em~. f~ i m~edal$, ue~ M my ~Nrw~e ~ rated Qate Accepted: N.R&~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~- c~actor: RoY AI~ Sh wry Seal (;ompeny's By: ~' ~' ~~ Title: ~ P..~& (~.& (~gnakure) j" If ~ contm~ d~s n~ ~gn eccepte~e of mis mr, his a~emion ~ dire~ to th$ requirements of ~ ~Hcifi:atfo~s as to ~eeding wi~ the ~dered work e~ Fding a walden protest wim[n ~e rime ~rein speedlied. ITEM 9 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: ~kPPROVAI- crrY ATTORNEY CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer March 28, 1995 Contract Change Order No. I for FY94-95 Citywide P.C.C. Repair Program, Project No. PW94-13 PREPARED BY: ~ Brad Buron, Maintenance Superintendent RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve Contract Change Order No. 1 for materials, labor and equipment for various items of work in the amount not to exceed $8,067.53. BACKGROUND: During the construction of the FY94-95 Citywide P.C.C. Repair Program the following items of work have resulted in a change to the contract. CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. I Provide additional concrete work and removals for installation of new sidewalks at various locations throughout the City Provide additional concrete work for installation of e new cross gutter located at the intersection of Moreno Road and Front Street. 3. Provide additional concrete work for installation of new curbs Citywide. Provide additional concrete work for installation of a new 6" driveway approach located near Front Street and Main Street. e Provide additional work for the re-compaction of wet sub-grade and replacement of asphalt concrete pavement at the intersection of Moreno Road and Front Street. Provide for an increase in cost per square foot for bid Item No. B due to reduction in quantity and since the construction areas were scattered throughout the City SUB-TOTAL of INCREASES: $20,942.31 r:.~qd~pt~5~328~,~-13.cc~ejp nUANTfflF:S ADJUSTMINT'R: The original contract bid quantity estimates were revised to reflect the actual quantities constructed in the field. Bid Item No. B decreased by 312 L.F. The cost difference for this item results in a decrease of $7,644.00. SUB-TOTAL DECREASES: $7,644.00 TOTAL ADJUSTED CONTRACT CHANGES: 3,298,31 : Utilizing the projects contingency, which was approved for this project, will account for · portion of the additional cost in the amount of $5,230.78. ADDITIONAL FUNDS REQUESTED: $8,067.53 FISCAL IMPACT: On October 18, 1994 the City Council awarded a contract for the FY94-95 Citywide P.C.C. Repair Program to Hillcrest Contracting for $52,307.85. Contract Change Order No. I is in the amount of $13,298.31, which is $8,067.53 over the projects contingency of $5,230.78. Therefore, an additional amount of $8,067.53 must be approved for the FY94-95 Citywide P.C.C. Repair Program. Adequate funds are available in the Public Works Department, Routine Street Maintenance budget Account #100-164-601-5402. r.',q~tws~a28Vw94-13.c~o/~ Mar 22 '95 10:30 P.02/03 cl'r~ o~' 'i'd211~ BOB 273 BO08:I 9/a Of T mecula QONTRA69' 2NAIIgN ~ NO. ¶ el. lET NOTi: :~]JLIbIIILNtlt Is not tfuc':w.--liMLiee~l by ~ CI-INIOilQNQUIBTED BY: Brad Buron, IVieintmqf~e 8, 9.rjnandent ~ CHANClt FRO VIDES FOR: A~ II~-RFk~E tn the fdlowing lsm,: Provfde additionel concrete wolk end reinHie fo~ installation of new dalewalks Citywide. ILl-TOTAL; 43,278.00 Provide edditienel oonerete wek and remevelm fer k, :lm4si'.en of · raw era Gutter located etlhe intlrllgtJen 431 Ivlmeo Reed end From' gtreet. tLMI-TOTAL: 3. il~ovkle additional ,'ancrfte work for inltallmiOn of new a Citywide. 6UIPTOTAI.., $1,732,B0 Provide additiomd gonefete wetit for ifetelllition of · new 6" thiQk driveway mpproe~ Iogated rear Front tPeet oM klein heel. 81JD-TrrAL~ 4751;0Q P~o~cle ,ddi~enel work for the N-oompmot~ of wet **jb*Oraido end mplBaer,~n'C Of upbeat concrete pevemefX leated It The inersection of Mofano ROECl Bad Front IUB-TOTAL; Provide fer en ir~,2rammm in ooet per acluee foot fix' bkl Item No. · due to redued~ in qulnety end dace The egneugtae Irm were nettrod throughout the City, lUll-TOTeM.: ,4pIIJ.44 CITY ~ IlM~CILA* le 278 lla08;# 3/3 (lllMllTlll Ar~_L_m'~!INTI: TIm odllirml ltdlb.S,t lid II ellmltll will avisill to riftlit N letill {llmmtlll ~mmmoied kl 1he Rekf. Id !tern No. I h~l ImndlV tlce II1 tie ~ of ~17,mt4,to~; The mat dlre;, =zm for INs itmm rearm in e dearssee o~ ¢$?,e44.00>, tUI-TOI'AL: < 17,144.06 > TOTAL: 0dgiMd Cmtm=t Amount ................................ , ProJab1 Condngmnm/ .... ,, ..... , ....................... ,... Ad,~ltlld {:}mot Amma~t ' chmn~orirmo~ ............................ , .......... Total Contract Amount .................................... AU~, 'Iraant of Calendar I:),ya ................ , ............... _~, I 52,307,66 I 6,230.78. I 87,Sal.el ' · I + 18017,5,1. I 68,606.16 Name: (Gompany'e name) Titis: Vi,,m-Prwaldm~t. If the Goatrector does not llgn maeptanGi ot d~l cider, hi attention ie Jkaoted mquirlmenll i:lf tlt llloib~ Is to woceedinO with Ihl orderIll work and filing ~m,t within tie ~me thamin ruMOred. ITEM 10 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer March 28, 1995 "No Parking" Zone on Margarita Road from Rancho Vista Road to Pauba Road from 6:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Weekdays PREPARED BY: Martin C. Lauber, Traffic Engineer RECOMMENDATION: The Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 95- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING "NO PARKING '" ZONE ON MARGARITA ROAD FROM RANCHO VISTA ROAD TO PAUBA ROAD FROM 6:00 A.M. TO 4:00 P.M. WEEKDAYS BACKGROUND: The Traffic Division of the Department of Public Works has received a letter from Temecula Valley School District requesting the relocation of their bus loading zone on Margarita Road (see attached letter). This item was previously included as part of our High School traffic operations study conducted in 1993. The existing loading zone was implemented under an emergency condition due to the short notice provided by the school district, prior to the beginning of high school classes. The existing parking restriction allows for bus parking from the existing campus access gate, on the east side of Margarita Road, north to the right turn lane at Rancho Vista Road. The area south of the campus access gate is open parking for students, parents, or teachers. The bus loading zone is currently restricted from 6:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. weekdays in order to provide additional parking in the evening and weekends for sporting event parking. If the loading zone is moved, it would not impact the total number of vehicular parking spaces available. The only detriment to the current arrangement is the Iogistics of maneuvering large busses from the curb to the left turn pocket at Rancho Vista Road. The change in driving behaviors due to such. a change is not predictable. The only certain improvement would be the ability of bums to traverse two (2) throughlanes in order to make a left turn onto Rancho Vista Road. FISCAL IMPACT: Sign Relocation - 2 Signs ~) ~65 = ~ 130 Red Curb - ~) $.58/L.F. X 300' = 174 TOTAL $ 304 Attaconebts: Resolution No. 95- Letter from Temecula Valley Unified School District Exhibit "A" r.~d~t~gS~tB2S~Fk~n.ms/ajp RESOLUI'ION NO. A RESOI,UHON OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLLq!~!NG "NO PAl/KING" ZONE MARGARITA ROAD FROM RANCHO VISTA ROAD TO PAUBA ROAD FROM 6.-00 AM. TO 4:00 P.M. W~-~K,~AYS The City Camoil of the City of Temec,,!l does resolve, determin~ and order as follows: _S~jon 1. Pursuant to Section 10.16.160, of the Temecula Municipal Code, 'No Parking' zone is hereby established in the City of Temecula on Margarita Road from Rancho Vista Road to Pauba Road from 6:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. as shown on Exhibit 'A'. Section 2. The City Clerk shall certif}, to the passage and adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOFrED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 28th day of March, 1995. Jeffrey Stone, Mayor '/" ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] r:.~lq,t~95~a328~opzizem.tht/tjp STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) SS CrrYOFTEMECULA ) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 9~- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 28th day of March, 1995 by the following roll call vote: AYES: 0 NOES: 0 ABSTAIN: 0 ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILlVlEMBERS: COUNCILlVlEMBERS: COUNCH..MLqVIBERS: Juue S. G-reek, City Clerk TEMECULA VALLEY Unified School District SUPERINTENDENT JA;,' ? '" January 19, 1995 City of Temecula 43174 Business Perk Drive Temeuula, CA 92591 Attention: Mr. Marry Lauber Traffic Engineer Dear Marry, Pursuant to our most recent discussions, I am reguesting that you bring before the city Traffic Commission the Tamecula Valley High School perking issue. As you will recall, the Temecula Valley Unified School District school buses pick up and drop off on ~he nor=hem section of Margerita Road and students perk along the southern end of Mergerita Road. As the buses leave the high school in the afternoon, a potential traffic hazard becomes ~uite apperent. The majority of the buses turn left onto Rancho Vista Road and, because of the traffic congestion and the limited access to ~he left lane, an unsafe situation exists. The District's request is that bus passenger loading and unloading be on the southern end of Mergarita Road and that student parking be placed on the northern end of Margarita Road. Temecula Valley High has been contacted and has no problems with the change. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Sincerely, Forrest Thomas Director of Transportation/ Safety Administrator FT: cr 31350 Rancho V~m Road / Temecula. CA 92592 1 (909) 676.-2661 Gr VO V,Z I ~r V9 ~ vl4r <E [] --~ Z - °//' 1, D E ITEM 11 TO: ~FROM: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT DATE: City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer March'28, 1995 SUBJECT: Parcel Map No. 28084- Hold Harmless Agreement PREPARED BY: Vu~aymond A. Casey, Principal Engineer - Land Development  ,Annie Bostre-Le, Engineering Technician RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: Approve the Hold Harmless Agreement with BA Properties, Inc. Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the agreement. BACKGROUND: On September 25, 1990, City Council approved Parcel Map No. 21383. Subdivision Agreements and Surety Bonds were submitted by Rancho Core Associates No. 1. On January 10, 1995, City Council approved the partial reduction of Faithful Performance Bond Amounts for Parcel Map No. 21383.. On January 12, 1995, the Planning Director of the City of Temecula approved Tentative Parcel Map No. 28084for reverting a portion of Parcel Map No. 21383to acreage. Final Parcel Map No. 28084 was approved by City Council on January 24, 1995. The owner of Parcel Map No. 28084 and the City have agreed that certain warranty and other repair items must be accomplished related to the bond work previously accomplished by Parcel Map No. 21383. The owners of Parcel Map No. 28084 have completed the bond work to the City's satisfaction. The City has imposed that the Owner record a Hold Harmless Agreement in lieu of substituting bonds for the underlying Parcel Map No. 21383 bonds for future warranty and other repair works that may be required related to the bond work. FISCAL IMPACT: None. Attachments: 1. Hold Harmless Agreement -1 - r:%agdfpt%95'tO328%pm28084.egr RECORDED AT REQUEST OF AND ~ RECORDED RETURN TO: June Greek, CityClerk CITY OF TEMECULA 4317d Bu~ness Park Drive Temecola, California 92~90 EXEMPT FROM RECORDER'S FEES PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTIONS 6103 AND 2T~83 HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT THIS HOLD HARMI-FSS AGREEMENT (this "Agreement") is made and entered into this day of , 1995, between the CITY OF TE~F_,CULA, a municipal corporation, bereinafter refen'ed to as "City" and BA PROPERTIES, INC., a Delaware corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Owner." In consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained herein, the parties hereto mutually agree as follows: Section 1. RECITALS. This Agreement is made and entered into with respect to the following facts, which are acknowledged as true and correct by the parties hereto: a. In connection with final approval of Parcel Map No. 21383, Owner's predecessor-in-interest posted bonds for sweets, drainage, sewer, water, survey monuments, traffic signal, taxes and grading (collectively, the "Parcel Map No. 21383 Bonds"). Owner's predecessor-in-interest accomplished some of the work contemphted by the Parcel Map No. 21383 Bonds, all of which related to the Remainder Property (described below). b. Owner is desirous of obtaining final approval from the City of Planning Application No. PA94-0120, Tentative Parcel Map No. 28084 and PA94-0121, Reversion to Acreage (co~ectively, the "F-ntitlements"), covering a portion of the real property affected by Parcel Map No. 21383 (the "Parcel Map No. 28084 Property"). That portion of the ~ property affected by Parcel Map No. 21383 which is not a part of the Parcel Map No. 28084 Property shall be referred to sometimes hereinaft~ as the "Remainder Property." The Parcel Map No. 28084 Property and the Remainder Property are more specifically described in Exhibits "A" and "B," respectively, attached hereto and incorporated herein by thi.~ reference. c. In connection with the final approval of the Entitlements, the City is willing to release that portion of the Parcel Map No. 21383 Bonds related to the Parcel Map No. 28084 Property. However, Owner and the City have agreed that certain warranty and other repair items must be accomplished related to the bond work previously accomplished by Owner' s predecessor-in-interest, as more particularly identified on Exhibit "C" attached hereto and incorporated herein by ~ reference (the "Bond Work"). d. While Owner has now complel~ the Bond Work to the City's satisfaction, the City is concorned about~ future wanmy and other repair work that may be mtuired related to the Bond Work. Conseqtumfiy, the City has impo. sed Condition No. 30 to the approval of the Entitlements whichrequires that Owner record a Hold Harmless ~nt in lieu of substituting bonds forthe Bond Work (the 'Hold Harmless Condition'). The panks now desire to enter into and record this Agreement in order to satisfy the Hold Harmless Condition. Section 2. OWNER TO HOLD CITY HARMI.I?-~S WITH RESPECT TO THE BOND WORK. Owner hereby agrees to indemnify and bold harmless the City, its officers, employees and agents from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City, its advisory agencies, appeal boards or legislative body in any way related to the Bond Work and the City's release of the Parcel Map No. 21383 Bonds specifically related thereto. Section 3, SATISFACTION OF CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, This Agreement satisfies Condition No. 30 to the approval of the Entitlements provided this Agreement remains valid, binding and enforceable against Owner, its successors and assigns. In the event thi~ Agreement is for any reason invalid, or for any reason not binding or enforceable against the Owner or its successors or assigns, then the Owner, on behalf of itseft and its successors and assigns, acknowledges that it is obligated to indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, employees and agents from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City, its advisory agencies, appeal boards or legislative body in any way related to the Bond Work and the City: s release of the Parcel Map No. 21383 Bonds specifically related thereto. Section 4. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the City and Owner with respect to Condition No. 30 of the Entitlements and the matters stated herein. Any prior agreements, promises, negotiations or representations not expressly set forth herein are of no force or effect. Subsequent modifications to this Agreement shall be effective only if in writing and signed by all parties. If any term, condition or covenant of this Agreement is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void or unenforceable, the rem3inin~ provisions of this Agreement shall be valid and binding. Section 5. WAIVER, Waiver by any party hereto of any term, condition, or covenant of this Agreement shall not constitute the waiver of any other term, condition, or covenant hereof. Section 6. BINDING EFFECT. a. Of the covenants which have been established pursuant to this Agreement, the same shall be deemed to be covenants nmning with the land for the benefit of the City in carrying out its statutory responsibilities under California law and to enforce the provision of the Temecula General Plan and the Conditions of Approval of the Enti~ements. The Covenants contained in this Agreement shall be binding for the benefit of the City and its successors and assigns, and such covenants shall nm in favor of the City for the entire period during which such covenants shah be in force and effect, without regard to whether the City is or remains an owner of any land or interest therein to which such covenants relate. H1.DHRM~.AGM/1 8010.001/031495 - 2 - b. This Agreement shall be binding upon the heirs, executors, admini~fators, successors and assigns of tbe partim hemo; providmi, bowever, upon lt~ transfor of all or any portion of the ~ prol~VJ affect~ by ~ Agreement, Owner shall be released from its obligations ~ this Agreement with respect to such tr~rt~.tred propcxty and the City agrees to look only to the new owner(s) of such propca ty for enforcement of thi.~ Agreemetn. Seelion 7. ATfORNEYS' FI~-~. If litigation is reasonably required to enforce or interpret the provisiom of thi.~ Agreement, the prevailing party in such litigation shatl be entified to an award of reasonable attorneys' fees and costs, in addition to any other relief to which it may be entified. Section 8. NOTICES. Any notices or other correspondence between the parties shall be sent to the foHowin~ unless either party gives the other notice of a change of address: CITY OF TEMECUI~ Director of Public Works 43174 Business Park Drive Temecnla, California 92590 OWNER BA PROPERTIES, INC. 333 South Beaudry Avenue 21st Floor; Unit 4242 Los Angeles, California 90017 Arm: Sandy Throop Section 9. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Agreement shall only become effective upon the final approval by the City of the Enti~ements and recordation of Final Parcel Map No. 28084, and shall terminate and be of no further force or effect upon the one ( 1 ) year anniversary of the recordation date of this Agreement. Notice shall be effective upon personal delivery, delivery by courier service or three business days following deposit in the United States Mail, postage prepaid, certified. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF TE~IECULA Jeff Stone Mayor HLDHRMI~.AGM/1 8010.001/03149~ - 3 - ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter M. Thorson City Auorney By: OWNER BA PROPERTIES, INC., A Dclawar~ Corporation Its': /'-, ? ';"' ' HI,DHRMI,S.AGM/I S010.001/tBI495 - 4 - ALL-HJRPOSE ACKNOWIII~~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE On , before me, , Notary Public, personally appeared , personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNF_SS my hand and official seal. SIGNATURE OF NOTARY D D INDrV/DUAL(S) OFFICER(S) (TIT~-~{S]): CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER D D D D D D D PARTNER(S) ATTORNEY-IN-FACT TRUSTEE(S) SUBSCRIBING WITNESS GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR CHAIRPERSON/MAYOR OTI-W~R: SIGNER IS REPEESENTING: (SOlO.COl/!s~lissrm.s~) HLDIgLzI3.AI3M/I 8010.001/031495 - ~ - ACKNOW~.~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF T,O- ~-aeq e-) On March 17. 1995 before me, Philomena A. Serrao a Notary Public in and for the State of California, personally appeared' Sandy Cae.idy m~d S~4y Throo~ personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the persons whose names are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that they executed the same in their authorized capacities, and that by their signatures on the instrument the persons, or the entity upon behalf of which the person[s] acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. (Signature) PHILOMENA A. $ERRAO co . Notary Pulallc -- California (Space above for official notarial seal) Page I of 2 EXHIBIT "A" Parcels 20 through 46, inclusive; 48 through 71, inclusive; 76 through 88, inclusive; 122 through 130 inclusive; all of Parcel Map No. 21383, as shown by Parcel Map on file in Book 167 Pages 18 through 25, inclusive, of Parcel Maps, Records of Riverside County, California; together with Parcel 47; Parcels 72 through 75, inclusive of said Parcel Map adjusted as Parcels A through E as shown by Lot Une Adjustment No. 20 recorded August 7, 1992 as instrument No. 293333 of Official Records of Riverside County, California; together with that portion of Parcel 119, Parcels 120 and 121 of said Parcel Map adjusted as Parcels A through C as shown by Lot Line Adjustment No. 21 recorded November 20, 1991 as instrument No. 40458 of Official Records of Riverside County, California, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the most Southerly corner of said Parcel Map No. 21383, thence Northerly, Easterly, Southerly and Easterly along the boundary of said Parcel Map No. 21383, the following eight (8) courses; North 39048'32" West, a distance of 2333.93 feet; Thence North 38050'27" East, a distance of 1532.84 feet; Thence South 19o50'46" East, a distance of 798.73 feet to the beginning of a curve concave Northeasterly and having a radius of 850.00 feet; ~-- Thence Southeasterly along said curve through a central angle of 4 °39'03", an arc length of 69.00 feet; Thence North 65°30'11" East a distance of 259.85 feet to the beginning of a curve concave Southerly and having a radius of 500.00 feet; Thence Easterly along said curve through a central angle of 12° 16'14", an arc length of 107.08 feet; Thence North 77=46'25'' East a distance of 651.63 feet to the beginning of a curve concave Northwesterly and having a radius of 800.00 feet; Thence Northeasterly along said curve through a central angle of 28039'45" an arc length of 400.20 feet; Thence North 49006'40" East a distance of 479.23 feet; the preceding seven (7) courses being also along the centerline of Winchester Road and Avenida De Ventas per said Parcel Map No. 21383; Thence South 40052'20'` East a distance of 39.00 feet to the Southerly right-of-way of said Avenida De Ventas, also being the most Northeasterly corner of said adjusted Parcel C per said Lot Line Adjustment No. 21; Thence South 55029'52" East along the Eastedy line of said Parcel C, a distance of 322.72 feet to the Southeasterly corner of said Parcel C; Page 2 of 2 Thence South 47°39'11" West along the Southerly line of said Parcels C, B and A of said Lot Line Adjustment No. 21, and the Southerly line of said Parcels 122 and 1 23, a distance of 666.16 feet to an angle point on the Southerly line of said Parcel 123; Thence South 65005'20" West along the Southerly line of Parcels 123 and 124, a distance of 162.12 feet to the Northeasterly corner of said Parcel 88; Thence South 25°39'49'' East along the Easterly line of said Parcel 88, and its prolongation, a distance of 462.83 feet to a point on the Southerly right-of-way of said Winchester Road, said point being on a curve concave Northwesterly and having a radius of 900.00 feet; a radial line to said point bears South 25039'49" East' Thence Southeasterly along said curve through a central angle of 8 o 17'45" an arc length of 130.31 feet; to the Northwest corner o.f Parcel 19 per said Parcel Map No. 21383; a radial to said point bears 17022'04" East; Thence South 17027'53'' East along the Westerly line of said Parcel 19, a distance of 130.76 feet, to an angle point on the Westerly line of said Parcel 19; Thence South 44°37'33'' East along the Westerly line of said Parcel 19 and Parcel 18 per said Parcel Map No. 21383, a distance of 293.60 feet to the Southwest corner of said Parcel ..---18 and the Southeasterly boundary of said Parcel Map No. 21383; Thence South 45 o 22'27" West along said Southeasterly boundary a distance of 201 2.73 feet to the Point of Beginning. Chri g PLS 6588 Exp. 12-31-95 .~  .~/~,L LAA/~ N0. 6588 7-95 TUE 10:12 AM MBS/LOWRY TE~ECULA FAX MO. 909 676 7976 P. 2 ID(HIBIT 'B' R93..007.00~ PARCELS I THROUGH 19, INCLUSIVE, 89 THROUGH 9,5, INCLUSIVE, AND 101 THROUGH 112, INOLUSIVE, OF PARCEL MAP NO. 21383, IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RNERSIDE. STATE OF OALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FIL~ IN BOOK 167, PAGES 18 THROUGH 25, INCLUSIVE, OF PARCEL MAPS, RECORDS OF SAID RIVERSIDE COUNTY'. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT POFri"ION LYING WITHIN PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 27336 AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN 9OOK 178, PAGES 8S AND 86 OF PARCEL MAPS, RECORDS OF SAID RIVERSIDE COUNTY. .) r- rO. zzI~ ~o: ' WINCHESTER BUSINESS PARK ~ .. TEHECUSA TR~2138a ESCONDIDO, CA 92046-0160 PUNCH LIST PER CONTRACT ~"' ~ .... ~" ' 5" ":"': ..... -- -;.,. ..:... . . . .. DE~DY · 42181 AVENIDA ALVAPukDO . " TEME~ OA 92590 l'age 1 GENERAL ,F_N.I31NEEFUNG CONTI~CTORS UC #432712 ~oe) .7.e-455o · FAX {m3e) eTe-2~3e .... ..GOLD YO: INV.DATE. SHIPPED VIA FOB TN~M,q ~.2/22/.9.4 0 Net 30' Days F. O.N~-::' P.O,DATE SALESMAN CONTaACT.,., '-'.'] .' ·" 12/O?/94 ' . · -....:. · [ · --;~_'-' .'-:.-7:"' ' ~ ' ~22~'00. ".K~g 6" c~ & GUTteR 2 6 3::$o o: -' ~. ~. S~OT ~ ~3'S'~ s~:'" ~' e;s. ~s ~. 00: ': ~RI~' PLO~ ~INg8 220,00.. R&R A. C, ' ONhY S~. 60.00 SKZN- FATCH .... 1.00 CLEA~. ~ VIDEO STO~ DRAIN WZ~CH. ONLY 6.00 PO~:~- ~ PA~CH C~I~PED CURa 6.100. ~:.~ED KILL JOINTS 32~.00 · R&R GU~ERS & SPANDRE~S AS ~EP 6~' 8F 1.0O 'I~STALL STD 303 D~IN LOT 19 le, .,o ',. ~:STann VE~ DZTC~ -' Tz= ... 5hipptn~ Tot&~ ·-...-...:,. ._.~ -. ;,'::_; -::..::1 ! ~:~-8 0 "' ' ' "' · · ' 63 .'00 : ' 8 " ', 2;63 3., 50 °5,:~9.0', OOF 22687'.50 52 ;,.50 Z.O0 21R.oo ** 4:.,:20 ~:,~'6~5'.0 16:.90' *: · * ..,..!. ~: · . ..~ ITEM 12 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY ATTORNEY CfTY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Gary Thornhill, Director of Plannin? March 28, 1995 Planning Application No. PA94-0120 and PA94-0121 Prepared By: Craig D. Ruiz, Assistant Planner RECOMMENDATION: APPROVE the Partial Termination of Development Agreement No. 90-1 and authorize the Mayor to Execute the Agreement. BACKGROUND On July 10, 1990, the City Council approved Tentative Parcel Map 21383. In approving the map, the Council conditioned the project to enter into a development agreement at a later date (See Attachment No. 2). This particular development agreement is not a typical agreement in comparison the agreements adopted by the Council in recent years. The sole purpose of this agreement was to allow the Council to approve the map at the July 1990 meeting while allowing staff the ability to place additional conditions of approval on the project at a later date through the development agreement. The Council approved Development Agreement No. 90-1 (DA90-1) on August 28, 1990 (See Attachment No. 3). On January 12, 1995, the Planning Director approved Planning Application Nos. PA94-0120 (Tentative Parcel Map No. 28084) and PA94-0121 (Reversion to Acreage). These two applications allow the applicant to re-map the westerly portion of Parcel Map 21383 and to allow for a Reversion to Acreage for this same area. The approval of Parcel Map 28084 requires, as stated in Section 3.3 of DA90-1, that the development agreement be amended to reflect the new map. Thus, the project was conditioned to amend the agreement. In addition, to insure that the conditions of approval that were placed upon the original project, through the development agreement, were also incorporated within the new project, the conditions from the development agreement were placed upon Parcel Map 28084. To comply with the condition to amend DA90-1, the applicant has elected to remove the area within Parcel Map No. 28084 from DA90-1. Because the relevant conditions from DA90-1 have been applied to Parcel Map 28084, the intent of the Council in approving Parcel Map 21383 still remains. Therefore, the development agreement no longer necessary. In addition, it is the opinion of the Assistant City Attorney that the termination agreement does satisfy the requirement to amend the Development Agreement. FISCAL IMPACT None. R:\STAFFRPT\120PA94.CC 3120/95 ktb 1 Attachments: Partial Termination of Development Agreement No. 90-1 - Page 3 City Council Minutes, July 10, 1990- Page 4 City Council Minutes, August 28, 1990 - Page 5 R:\STAFFRPT\120PAg/,.CC 3/20/95 ktb 2 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 PARTIAL TERMINATION OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT R:\STAFFRPT\120PAg~.CC 3/20/95 ktb 3 RECORDED AT RF.Q~ OF AND WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: June Greek, City Clerk C1TY OF TEM~CULA 43174 Business Park Drive Temeeula, California 92.~90 ~ FROM RECORDER'S FEES pursuant to Government Code Section 6103 and 27383 PARTIAL TERMINATION OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 90-1 This PARTIAL TERMINATION OF DEVELOPMENT AGP, EI~IENT NO. 9(}-1 (this "Partial Termination") is entered into effective on the date it is recorded with the Riverside County Recorder, hereinafter referred to as the "Effective Date," by and between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City" and BA Properties, Inc., a Delaware Corporation hereinafter referred to as "Owner.~ In considention of the mutual promises and covenants contained herein, the parties hereto mutually agree as follows: REC1TALS SECTION 1. RECITALS. This Partial Termination is made and entered into with respect to the following facts, which are acknowledged as true and correct by the parties hereto: a. Effective October 19, 1990, City and Owner's predecessOr-in-interest, Rancho Core Associates No. 1, a California limited parmership, entered into that certain Development Agreement No. 90-1 (the "Agreement"). Unless otherwise deftned, the capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meanings as set forth in the Agreement. b. The Agreement defines Existing Development Approvals as Tentative Parcel Map No. 21383. Since the date of the Agreement, Final Parcel Map No. 21383 was recorded in the Official Records of Riverside County. c. Owner is now processing Final Parcel Map No. 28084 over that portion of the Property described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto (legal description) and shown in Exhibit "B" attached hereto (Plat Map) (the "Affected Property"). Parcel Map No. 28084 is a one lot parcel map, and contemplates the vacation of all streets with its boundaries previously dedicated on Parcel Map No. 21383. d. Owner and City now desires to terminate the Agreement With respect to the Affected Property on the terms and conditions set forth below. OPERATIVE PROVISIONS SECTION 2. PARTIAl, TERMINATION. The Agreement is hereby terminated with respect to the Affected Property, including, without limitation the benefits and burdens imposed --on Owner with respect to the Affected Property as more specifically set forth in Section 4.2.1 of the Agreement. SECTION 3. OPEN SPACE. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the area shown on Exhibit "B" attached herew and incorporated herein by ~is reference and formerly known as lots 66 through 73 of Parcel Map No. 21383 shall remain as open space as required by the Agreement. SECTION 4. ~G EFFECTIVENESS. Except as modified pursuant to this Partial Termination, the terms and provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 5. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Partial Termination shall only become effective upon recordation of Final Parcel Map No. 28084. IN WITNESS WH~,EOF, the parties herew have executed this Partial Termination as of the day and year set forth below. OWNER BA PROPERTIES, INC., a Delaware Corporation Dated: CITY OF ~CULA --Dated: Jeff Stone, Mayor ATTEST: June Greek, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter Thorson, City Attorney (westsid~jat2) ALL-PIHtPOSE ACKNO~EMENT STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE On , before me, , Notary Public, personally appeared , personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and a~knowledged to mc that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instnunent the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instnunent. WITNESS my hand and official seal. SIGNATURE OF NOTARY 0 0 1NDNmUAL(S) OFFICER(S) CrrrLE[s]): CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER O O O O O O O PARTNER(S) ATTORNEY-IN-FACT TRUSTEE(S) SUBSCRIBING WITNESS GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR CHAIRPERSON/MAYOR OTHER: SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: AC]rNOW~ ,~rr'K~,~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF Los ~nueles) On March 17. 1995 before me, Philomena A. Serrao a Notary Public in and for the State of California, personally appeared Sandy Cas-idy and Sandy Throop personally known to me (or proved to me.on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the persons whose n8mes are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that they executed the same in their authorized capacities, and that by their signatures on the instrument the persons, or the entity upon behalf of which the person[s] acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my b~nd and official seal. ( Signature ) J~ PHILOMENA k ~ER~AO (Space above for official notaria1 seal) Page 1 o~' 2 EXHIBIT "A' Parcels 20 through 46, inclusive; 48 through 71, inclusive; 76 through' 88, inclusive; 122 through 130 inclusive; all of Parcel Map No. 21383, as shown by Parcel Map on file in Book 167 Pages 18 through 25, inclusive, of Parcel Maps, Records of Riverside County, California; together with Parcel 47; Parcels 72 through 75, inclusive of said Parcel Map adjusted as Parcels A through E as shown by Lot Une Adjustment No. 20 recorded August 7, ,1992 as instrument No. 293333 of Official Records oi' Riverside County, California; together with that portion of Parcel 119, Parcels 120 and 1 21 of said Parcel Map adjusted as Parcels A through G as shown by Lot Une Adjustment No. 21 recorded November 20, 1991 as instrument No. 40458 of Official Records of Riverside County, California, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the most Southerly corner of said Parcel Map No. 21383, thence Northerly, Easterly, Southerly and Easterly along the boundary ol' said Parcel Map No. 21383..the following eight-(8) courses; North 39048'32" West, a distance of 2333.93 feet; Thence North 38'~50'27'' East, a distance of 1532.84 feet; Thence South 19"50'46" East, a distance of 798.73 feet to the beginning of a curve concave Northeasterly and having a radius of 850.00 feet; ~,~-'--,, Thence Southeasterly along said curve through a central angle of 4'"39'03", an arc length of 69.00 feet; Thence North 65'"30'11" East a distance of 259.85 feet to the beginning of a curve concave Southerly and having a radius of 500.00 feet; Thence Easterly along said curve through a central angle of 12° 16'14% an arc length of 107.08 feet; 'Thence 'North 77°46'25" East a distance of 651.63 feet to the beginning of a curve concave Northwesterly and having a radius of 800.00 feet; Thence Northeasterly aJong said curve through a central angle of 28'"39'45" an arc length of 400.20 feet; Thence North 49'"06'40" East a distance of 479.23 feet; the preceding seven (7) courses being also along the centerline of Winchester Road and Avonida De Ventas per said Parcel Map No. 21383; Thence South 40'"52'20" East a distance of 39 00 feet to the Southerly right-of-waY of said Avertida De Ventas, also being the re?st NortheastL~dY comer of said adjusted Parcel C per said Lot Une Adjustment No. 21; Thence South 55'"29'52" East along the Easterly line of said Parcel C, a distance of 322.72 feet to the Southeasterly corner of said Parcel C; Page 2 of 2 Thence South 47°39'11" West along the Southerly line of sad Parcels C, B and A Of said '~,. Lot Une Adjustment No. 21, and the Southerly line of said Pazcels 122 and 123, a distance of 666.16 feet to an angle point on the Southerly line of said Parcel 123; Thence South 65°05'20" West along the Southerly line of Parcels 123 and 124, a distance of 162.12 feet to the Northeasterly corner of said Parcel 88; : Thence South 25"39'49" East along the Easterly line of said Parcel 88, and its prolongation, a distance of 462.83 feet to a point on the Southerly right-of-way of said Winchester Road, said point being on a curve concave Northwesterly and having a radius of 900.00 feet; a radial line to said point bears South 25039'49" East' Thence Southeas'teily along said curve through a central angle of 8" 17'45" an arc length of 130.31 feet; to the Northwest corner o.f Parcel 19 per said Parcel Map No. 21383; a radial to said point bears 17~22'04'' East; Thence South 17027'53" East along the WeSterly-line of said Parcel 19, a distance of 130.76 feet, to an angle point on the Westerly line of said Parcel 19; Thence South 44~37'33" East along the Westerly line of said Parcel 19 and Parcel 18 per said Parcel Map No. 21383, a distance of 293.60 feet to the Southwest corner of said Parcel 18 and the Southeasterly boundary of said Parcel Map No. 21383; Thence South 45o22'27" West along said Southeasterly boundary a distance of 201 2:7,' feet to the Point of Beginning. PLS 6588 Exp. 12-31-95 c~::~ N0. 6588 ~2-20-95 lION 2:11 PH tlBS/LOWRY TEIIECULA PAX NO. ~09 676 7~76 P. 4 , //' ~ c~~'P~ ~~ ~ ~' ..... ~ 9 z - 6z ~5 / ~ ~ ' 8 I 9o I m ! sz I ' -- ~ 56 oF c k~ ~ el. ~ 12-31~~ x. ~;; g !:~ ...... .. / ;, , ,: · ., _~ ", ..: C~lS ~. BE 6588 EXP* ~-95""' ATTACHMENT NO. 2 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES, JULY 10, 1990 R:\STAFFRPT\120PA~.CC 3/20/~5 kLb 4 ,/-- C~tv Council M~nutes July ~0.1990 Mayor Parks opened the public hearing at 7:40 PM. Mayor Parks asked if it is a procedural matter that a public hearing be held on this issue. Mr. Smith stated this is the case and property owners involved have been notified of the public hearing. ~ Having no requests to speak, Mayor Parks closed .the public hearing at 7:41 PM. Councilmember Birdsall moved, Councilmember Moore seconded a motion to direct staff to proceed with abatement procedures pursuant to the provisions adopted in Resolution 90-55. The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Mu~oz, Parks NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCIIAMEMBERS: None COUNCIL BUSINESS 11. Second Extension of Time - Tentative Parcel MaD 21383 Gary Thornhill, Principal Planner, stated this is a request for a second extension of time on Tentative Parcel Map 21383. He said this item came before the Council on June 26, 1990, and discussions were held regarding the amount of proposed grading for this site. The intention of staff was to resolve these concerns and come back to the Council with a receive and file recommendation, however the problems have not been resolved and the recommendation of staff is to set this item for public hearing on July 24, 1990. Mayor Parks stated the applicant has requested that the Council approve this issue tonight and submitted a letter to the Council offering to enter into a development agreement with the City addressing the concerns of the Planning Department. Mr. Thornhill said he felt this is not the best method-to handle this situation,,stating staff may be able to simply condition the map. Mayor Parks said the map was approved by the County on March 24, '1987, and he understands the developer is experiencing a M~ nute~\l \9\90 -5- 07/18/90 C tv Council M~nutes July 10. 1990 hardship due. to the length of time it has taken to process this project. City Attorney Fields recommended the best way to handle this issue is to set for public hearing so all the issues can be addressed and at that time, if the Council Zaels it is appropriate, the extension of time could be conditioned. He said his concern with approvingthe extension tonight would be the exclusion of other interested third parties. Councilmember Moore said it is her understanding that public hearings have been held on this issue by the County. City Attorney Fields stated hearings have been held, but only on the original map. Councilmember BirdCall said the developer is agreeing to the conditions the Council has asked for, and she does not feel there is a need for another pubic hearing. Councilmember Lindemans objected to the grading .planned for this project, requesting that the City take a stand on the amount of excavation, permitted on the hillsides. He asked about phasing maps and who would be responsible for landscaping. Councilmember Moore moved, Councilmember Birdsall seconded a motion to approve a second extension of time and require the owner to enter into a development agreement as set forth in a letter dated July 5, 1990. Councilmember Mufioz asked that the matter be set for-public hearing as recommended by staff. Councilmember Lindemans requested referring this to the Planning Commission for public hearing. He said the City needs a master plan before damage done by projects such as this is irreversible. Gary Thornhill reported that in the event the Council wishes approve this second extension of time, further conditions have been suggested by staff. He said the conditions outlined in the letter from the developer were tightened, and the developer is in agreement withthe modifications- He provided the Council with an additional staff report outlining the suggested changes. Mayor Parks stated that the developer has agreed to be responsive to the City's conditions and stated that further delay of this project, causes a great hardship on the MirlutL~\l\9\gQ -6- 07/18/90 ~- C~tv Council Minutes July 10, 1990 developer- He stressed this project, with the agreed conditions, is in the best interest of the citizens of Temecula- Councilmember Lindemans questioned who would be responsible for landscaping of this project- Mayor Parks answered that before a grading permit is granted, bonding mus~be done for landscaping- .City Manager Dixon stated the issue tonight is a second extension of time, not a final approval- He said the Planning Department would have time to review the conditions proposed and make changes if necessarY- The final approval will still come before the Council. Councilmember ~Ufioz stated if staff recommends a public hearing, he believes this is the best course of action. The motion was amended by Councilmember Moore, and the second by Councilmember Birdsall as follows: Approve second extension of time on Tentative Parcel Map 21383, =require the developer to enter into an agreement incorporating the standards and conditions set forth in the supplemental staff report, and direct staff to submit this developers agreement to the City Council concurrent with the final map. The motion was carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: 3 NOES: 2 ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Moore, Parks Lindemans, Mufioz None RECESS Mayor Parks called a recess at 8:20 PM. The meeting was reconvened, following the CSD meeting at 9:00 PM. 12.' Tract 23304 (Club Valencia) ' Final MaD Traffic Study Doug Stewart Deputy City Engineer, reported this subdivision was originally approved by the County of-Riverside Board of Directors on May 10 · 1988. -The project has recently been extended 60 days a~iting City approval- The 60 days runs out tonight- He 'explained this tract was originally approved as a condominiumproject, and has been changed to an apartment complex- 07/18190 '7- nut es\l \9\90 ATTACHMENT NO. 3 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES, AUGUST 28, 1990 R:\STAFFRPT\120PAg~.CC 3/201~5 ktb 5 City Council Minutes Aug~st ~8. 19~)0 28. nevelooment A~reement for Tentative Parcel M~p No..~1383 - Rancho Core Associates No.. I Mayor Parks opened the public hearing at 12:10 AM. Gary Thornhill reported this item was before the City Council on July 1 O, 1990 as a receive and file item. At that time staff recommended additional conditions of approval be added to the project. The determination was made that a development agreement would be the appropriate vehicle for incorporating those conditions of approval. In response to that, a development agreement, and ordinance have been prepared. He reported this developpent agreement implements the conditions of approval that were recommended to the Council on July 10, 1990 with the exception of Condition D, which would present legal problems. In lieu of this condition the applicant offered to give the City two additional open space lots. Staff recommends: 28.1 Adopt a Negative Declaration for tentative Parcel Map NO. 21383. : 28.2 Read by title only and introduce an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 90-16 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECUL~. APPROVING DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 90-1 28.3. Authorize the Mayor to execute the development agreement between the City of Temecula and Rancho Core Associates No. 1. Councilmember Lindemans asked why this project is not multiple phased. He said this project with 130 lots, should take 10 to 15 years to build out. He requested that it be phased. Gary Thornhill said his understanding is the developer is proposing to phase the project. He said he has a phasing plan that has been made available to staff. Counciimember Lindemans asked staff if a Community Services District for the plan is feasible and whether the City should own and maintain the park' at this location. 'Ninutt, s\8"~,8\fO -21- Qe111/'gO Citv Council Minutes Aug-st ~8. 1990 City Manager Dixon stated that we can have a sub-zone in the CSD where specific types of landscaping can be addressed. He said regarding the park, the City should own and maintain the park. Councilmember Lindemans requested adding these items to the.agreement. Dean Allen, 29377 Rancho California Road, Suite 202, stated this project was purchased in 1977, and in 1987 the plans were approved. He showed the Council a drawing illustrating this project. He said the conditions agreed upon give eight lots as open space to the City, provide another lot for access for a road, and provide a park lot in the center of the project. He said the park will consist of approximately nine acres when completed. He advised there is a p'~asing plan, which he presented to Council. In response to the second question regarding the maintenance of the park and hillside, it is currently the applicants proposal to maintain them as a property' owners association in a very high quality manner. He said it is possible for the owners to maintain it originally, and possibly dedicate the maintenance to the CSD at a later point. Bill Johnson, 29377 Rancho California Road, Suite 202, thanked Council and staff for their work on this project. He discussed the environmental sensitivity of the project, the quality of the project and the economic impact on the City. He said the linear parkway is intended to be used as a public facility. He stated he would welcome a discussion with CSD regarding maintenance, however a very high standard of maintenance is desired, and the money needed to do this would be provided by the property owners. Jogging and biking paths are also being looked at for this project. He said this project will be committed to bring jobs to Temecula. Mayor Parks closed the public hearing at 12:29 AM. ninutes%8'%28%.fO -Zf- ~11 City Council Minutes Auqust ~8. 1990 Councilmember Moore moved, Councilmember Mu~oz seconded a motion to adopt a negative declaration for tentative Parcel Map No. 21383. The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Mu~oz, Parks NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None It was moved by Councilmember Lindemans, seconded by Counciimember Moore to read by title c;nly and introduce an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 90-16 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPRO VING DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 90- I *' with the addition of placing the construction phasing map in the Development Agreement as Exhibit "F". The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Mu~oz, Parks NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None 09/~/90 'Ninutes\8%28\90 -30- ' City Council Minutes Augt ,st ~8. 1990 Councilmember Lindemans moved, Councilmember Birdsall seconded a motion to authorize the Mayor to execute the development agreement between the City of Temecula and Rancho Core Associates No. 1. The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Mu~oz, Parks NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None It was moved by Councilmember Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember Birdsall to extend the meeting to 1:00 AM. The motion was unanimously carried. 29. Tentative Tract Man No. 23513 Mayor Parks opened the public hearing at 12:35 AM. Gary Thornhill stated this is a request to subdivide 14.37 acres into 11 lots. He said this project was reviewed by the City staff and brought before Council on June 26, 1990. At that meeting the staff recommended the item be set for public hearing. The grading concerns have been satisfied as well as the compatibility with surrounding projects. Projects to the North are 1/2 acre lots, which is consistent with this development. Staff recommends approval of this project. Counciimember Mu~oz asked how significant 27 feet of grading is. Gary Thornhill stated staff does not feel it is significant. He said they are basically creating building pads. Councilmember Lindemans asked if this project was noticed more than 300 feet as requested by Council on June 26, 1990. Mr. Thornhill stated he would need TO check the case file. Tod Thomas, 41934 Main ;Street, stated he had letters in support of this project that are from property'owners over 1,000 feet from the site. ' ' Mayor Parks closed the public .hearing at 12:50 AM. tl t ruates\8~,l\f(I -31 - 09111/90 RECORDED AT REQ~ OF AND WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: June Greek, City Clerk CITY OF TEMECULA 43174 Bn~Im~ Park Drive Temecula, California 92~90 EXEMPT FROM RECORDER'S FEES pursuant to Government Code Section 6103 and 27383 PARTIAL TERMINATION OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 90-1 This PARTIAL TERMINATION OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 90-1 (this "Partial Termination") is entered into effective on the date it is recorded with the Riverside County Recorder, hereinafter referred to as the "Effective Date," by and between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation, bereinafter referred to as "City" and BA Properties, Inc., a Delaware Corporation hereinafter referred to as "Owner." In consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained herein, the parties hereto mutually agree as follows: RECITALS SECTION 1. RECITALS. This Pmial Termination is made and entered into with respect to the following facts, which are acknowledged as true and correct by the parties hereto: a. Effective October 19, 1990, City and Owner's predecessor-in-~, Rancho Core Associates No. 1, a California limited partnership, entered into that certain Development Agreement No. 90-1 (the ' Agreement"). Unless otherwise defined, the capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meanings as set forth in the Agreement. b. The Agreemere defines Existing Development Approvals as Tentative Parcel Map No. 21383. Since the date of the Agreement, Final Parcel Map No. 21383 was recorded in the Official Records of Riverside County. c. Owner is now processing Final Parcel Map No. 28084 over that portion of the Property described in Exhibit ' A ~ attached hereto (legal description) and shown in Exhibit 'B' attached hereto (Plat Map) (the ~ Affected Property*). Parcel Map No. 28084 is a one lot parcel map, and contemplates the vacation of all streets with its boundaries previously dedicated on Parcel Map No. 21383. d. Owner and City now desires to termiuate t~ Agreement with respect to the Affected Property on the mrms and conditions set forth below. OPERATIVE PROVISIONS SECTION 2, PARTIAl. TERMINATION. The Agreement is hereby terminated with respect to the Affected Property, including, without limitation the benefits and burdem impo, sed on Owner with respect to the Affected l~Dpcaty as more specifically set forth in Section 4.2.1 of the Agreement. SECTION 3. OPgN SPACE. Notwithstnnding the foregoing, the area shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and formerly known as lots 66 through 73 of Parcel Map No. 21383 shah remain as open space as required by the Agreement. SECTION 4. RElVLA~G EFFR~~g. Except as modified pursuant to this Partial Termination, the terms and provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION S. EFFECTIVE DATE-, This Partial Termination shall only become effective upon recordation of Final Parcel Map No. 28084. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Partial Termination as of the day and year set forth below. OWNER BA PROPERTIES, INC., a Delaware Corporation Dated: CITY CITY OF TEMECImA Jeff Stone, Mayor ATTEST: June Greek, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter Thorson, City Attorney (wesmide~anisl2) ALL-~SE ACKNOWLRrICvEM!~NT STATE OF CAI-H~ORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE On , before me, , Notary Public, personally appeared , personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in Ms/he/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instntment. WITNESS my hand and official seal. SIGNATURE OF NOTARY D D m'D~UAL(S) OFFiCER(S) (TrrLE[S]): CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER D D D D D D D PARTNER(S) ATTORNEY-IN-FACT TRUSTF-F*(S) SUBSCRIBING WITNESS GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR CHAIRPERSON/MAYOR OTHER: SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF r.os ~ngel e~) On March 17. !995 before me, Phi!omaha A. Serrao a Notary Public in and for the State of California, personally appeared Sandy Cassidy and Sandy Throop personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the persons whose names are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that they executed the same in their authorized capacities, and that by their signatures on the instrument the persons, or the entity upon behalf of which the person[s] acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. (Signature) PHILOMENA A. ~ERRAO COMM. · 1032470 Public -- Califomio (Space above for official notarial seal) Page 1 of 2 EXHIBIT "A" Parcels 20 through 46, inclusive; 48 through 71, inclusive; 76 through 88. inclusive; 122 through 130 inclusive; all of Parcel Map No. 21383. as shown by Parcel Map on file in Book 167 Pages 18 through 25. inclusive, of Parcel Maps. Records of Riverside County, California; together with Parcel 47; Parcels 72 through 75, inclusive of said Parcel Map adjusted as Parcels A through E as shown by Lot Line Adjustment No. 20 recorded August 7, 1992 as instrumer~t No. 293333 of Official Records of Riverside County, California; together with that portion of Parcel 119, Parcels 120 and 1 21 of said Parcel Map adjusted as Parcels A through C as shown by Lot Une Adjustment No. 21 recorded November 20, 1991 as instrument No. 40458 of Official Records of Riverside County. California, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the most Southerly corner of said Parcel Map No. 21383, thence Northerly. Easterly, Southerly and Easterly along the boundary of said Parcel Map No. 21383. :the following eight-(8) courses; North 39°48'32" West, a distance of 2333.93 feet; Thence North 38050'27'' East, a distance of 1532.84 feet; Thence South 19°50'46'' East, a distance of 798.73 feet to the beginning of a =curve concave Northeasterly and having a radius of 850.00 feet; Thence Southeasterly along said curve through a central angle of 4°39'03", an arc lengtl of 69.00 feet; Thence North 65°30'11'' East a distance of 259.85 feet to the beginning of a curve concave Southerly and having a radius of 500.00 feet; Thence Easterly along said curve through a central angle of 12° 16'14", an arc length of 107.08 feet; Thence North 77046'25" East a distance of 651.63 feet to the beginning of a curve concave Northwesterly and having a radius of 800.00 feet; Thence Northeasterly along said curve through a central angle of 28=39'45" an arc length of 400.20 feet; Thence North 49 '~06'40" East a distance of 479.23 feet; the preceding seven (7) courses... being also along the centerline of Winchester Road and Avenida De Ventas per said Parcel Map No. 21383; Thence South 40 ° 52'20" East a distance of 39.00 feet to the Southerly right-of-way of said Avenida De Ventas, also being the most Northeasterly corner of said adjusted Parcel C per said Lot Line Adjustment No. 21; ~ Thence South 55'~29'52" East along the Eastedy line of said Parcel C, a distance 322.72 feet to the Southeasterly corner of said Parcel C; Page 2 of 2 Thence South 47°39'11" West along the Southerly line of said Parcels C, B and A of said Lot Une Adiustment No. 21, and the Southerly line of said Parcels122 and 1 23, a distance of 666.16 feet to an angle point on the Southerly line of said Parcel 123; Thence South 65005'20" West along the Southerly line of Parcels 123 and 124, a distance of 162.12 feet to the Northeasterly corner of said Parcel 88; : Thence South 25°39'49'' East along the Easterly line of said Parcel 88, and its prolongation, a distance of 462.83 feet to a point on the Southerly right-of-way of said Winchester Road, said point being on a curve concave Northwesterly and having a radius of 900.00 feet; 'a radial line to said point bears South 25°39'49" East' Thence Southeasterly along said curve through a central angle of 8 ° 17'45" an arc length of 130.31 feet; to the Northwest corner qf Parcel 19 per said Parcel Map No. 21383; a radiar to said point bears 17°22'04'' East; Thence South 17°27'53" East along the Westerly.line of said Parcel 19, a distance of 130.76 feet, to an angle point on the Westerly line of said Parcel 19; The~nce South 44°37'33" East along the Westerly line of said Parcel 19 and Parcel 18 per said Parcel Map No. 21383, a distance of 293.60 feet to the Southwest corner of said Parcel 18 and the Southeasterly boundary of said Parcel Map No. 21383; Thence South 45 °22'27" West along said Southeasterly boundary a distance of 20'~ 2:73 feet to the Point of Beginning. PLS 6588 Exp. 12-31-95 ~ - N0. 6588 gAI-20-95 MOlt 2:11 Pli IiBS/LOfiY TKi~CULA ;AI !tO. 909 676 7976 P. 4 ITEM 13 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY MANAGER~ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer March 28, 1995 Acceptance of Public Streets into the' City Maintained-Street System (Within Tract No. 21760) PREPARED BY: O~t/~lbert RECOMMENDATION: K. Crisp, Permit Engineer. That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 95--- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY MAINTAINED-STREET SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACT NO. 21760) BACKGROUND: The City Council received and filed Tract No. 21760, on June 13, 1990, and entered into subdivision agreements for the improvement of streets and drainage, and sewer and water systems, with: Rancho Highlands Venture I The developer, Rancho Highlands Venture I, and successor-in-interest, WRI Rancho Highlands Venture, a California Limited Partnership, have improved to City standards the public improvements in accord with the subdivision agreements. The Public Works Department has recommended acceptance of the subject improvements and initiation of the one-year warranty period. A Faithful Performance warranty bond has been posted. On March 28, 1995 the City Council accepted the improvements and a Faithful Performance Warranty bond, and initiated the one-year warranty period. Under provisions of the Streets and Highways Code (Section 1806), public streets offered by the subdivider must be accepted by City Council resolution in order to be included in the public-street maintained system. agdtpt~95~O328~tr21760.row 0315951dn: The streets so affected are Calla Nacido, Corte Rialto, Via Fanita, Corte Copa, Via Mendo, and portions of Preece Lane, Tierre Vista Road, and Corte Fresca. Inasmuch as certain state funds are earmarked for maintenance of these publicly-maintained streets, the process will make these streets eligible for those funds. FISCAL IMPACT: These streets will be integrated into the City's Pavement Management System and will receive periodic surface and/or structural maintenance efforts. The new pavement condition of these streets should necessitate only limited surface or structural treatments for 7 to 10 years. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution No. 95- with Exhibits "A-B", inclusive. cc: Brad Buron, Maintenance Superintendent aldrptWS~O32~'21760.mw 031,W~ldmc RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE C1TY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEIVIECULA, CP-LIFORNIA, ACCl;I'IING CERTAIN S's~t~s:xS INTO THE CITY-MAINTAINED STI~EET SYSTEM (Wn'H sN TRACT NO. 21760) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ~ DOES RESOLVE, DErHR_M]NE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: WHEREA, S, Rancho Highlands Venture I offered for dedication to the City of Temecula certain streets within Tract No. 21760 for public street and public utility purposes, and said City of Temec~!~ accepted said often of dedication by City Council action on .June 12, 1990. WBER~.&S, the City desires to accept into the City-maintained street system the public impwvements within all or portions of the public streets offered and accepted by the City of Temecula as depicted in Exhibit *B*; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Temecuh as follows: Section 1. That the City of Temecula accept into the City Maintained-Street System those streets or portions of public streets offered and accepted by the City Council described in Exhibits 'A" and 'B* attached hereto. Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution and accept the streets and portions thereof, offered to and accepted by the City Council, into the City- Maintained-Street System as described in Exhibits *A* and *B* attached hereto. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 28th day of March, 1995. Jeffrey Stone, Mayor a$~lrVt~$M~2~M/21760.mw O~l$~$1akc June S. Greek City Clerk STATE OF CAI-I!~ORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMBCULA ) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify thsI Resolution No. 95- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of" Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 28th day of March, 1995, by the following vote: AYES: 0 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCrt-~MBERS: COUNCILMPMBERS: COUNCH~MP-MBERS: COUNTERS: agd~95~328~r21760.mw 011S9'jlak~ F,x, Hrarr 'A' TO ~LUTION NO. 95- Accep~na the public streets offered to and accepted for Public Road and Public Ut~ity Purposes by the City of T~!m as Ind|csted on Tract No. 21760, and accepting subject public streets into the CRy ]V[a|ntn|ned-~treet Systeul as described below: Those lots described as Lots *A" through wI" inclusive, as shown on Tract No. 21760, f'ded 21 June 1990, in Book 219 of Maps, Pgs 54-63 Ind., further described as follows: (Lot (Lot "B") (Lot "C") (Lot "D") (Lot "E") (Lots (Lot 'H") (Lot "I') Portion of Prew~ Lane Portion of Tierra Vista Road · Calle Nacido Corte Copa Via Fanita & "G") Corte Rialto Via Mondo Portion of Corte Fresca agdtptX95X037.SXtt21760.tow 0315951ak~ EXHIBIT 'B' TO RESOLUTION NO. 95- m SUBJECT ACCEPTANCE- PUBUC STREETS INTO THE CITY-MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM AS INDICATED BELOW: Prcject, Sitc , -, ) STATE 'A~aaCE ,.,..,'.,/ TRACT NO. 21760 ITEM 14 TO: APPROVAl CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT FROM: DATE: City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicek, Director of Public Works/City Engineer March 28, 1995 SUBJECT: Acceptance of Public Street into the City Maintained-Street System (Butterfield Stage Road from Rancho California Road to De Portola Road) PREPARED BY: ~'Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 95--- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A CERTAIN PUBLIC STREET CONSTRUCTED UNDER ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 159 INTO THE CITY MAINTAINED-STREET SYSTEM {BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD FROM RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD TO DE PORTOLA ROAD) BACKGROUND: Rancho Villages Assessment District No. 159 was formed under the provisions of the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 while under the jurisdiction of the County of Riverside. The Riverside County Transportation Department administers the construction contracts for Assessment District No. 159 through consultant contract administrators and inspectors. As each phase of work under the Assessment District program is completed, the consultants recommend acceptance of the work to the Transportation Department and then to the Board' of Supervisors. The Board 'then accepts the recommendation and executes and has filed a "Notice of Completion". n~AOD~"~s~0~2rdKFFpLD~,D.ACC The Assessment District contractor has setisfactorily completed the construction Of Butterfield Stage Road from Rancho California Road to De Portola Road in accordance with County plans, specifications, and standards. The Board of Supervisors authorized the issuance of the Notice of Completion for the public improvements end for similar improvements on Pauba Road from Butterfield Stage Road to Easterly City Limits on July 7, 1992. The Riverside County Transportation Department has so notified the City of Temecula, and the City Public Works Department has reviewed the project in the field. The Riverside County Transportation Department requests that the City of Temecula accept the pertinent public improvements thereby accepting the maintenance responsibilities. The Public Works Staff recommends City Council acceptance of the right-of-way and acceptance of the Street and Drainage improvements in Butterfield Stage Road only at this time. The Pauba Road improvements are not setisfactory to City Staff and will require some repairs and related work to qualify for Staff recommendation for acceptance of improvements and into the City Maintained-Street System. The County of Riverside previously accepted some of the offers of dedication for street and public utility purposes for portions of Butterfield Stage Road recommended for acceptance into the Maintained-Street System for vesting purposes only and not into the County Maintained Road System. The City Council more recently has accepted offers of dedication for portions of this street for public road and public utility purposes. Acceptance of the Street and Drainage improvements is recommended by Council Minute Action. Acceptance of the street into the City Maintained-Street System shall be by City Council Resolution in accordance with Streets and Highway Code Section No. 1806. FISCAL IMPACT: This street will be integrated into the City's Pavement Management System and will receive periodic surface and/or structural maintenance efforts. The new pavement condition of this street should necessitate only limited surface or structural treatments for 5 to 7 years. In addition some erosion control measures may be necessary until such time as the parkway improvements are completed through subsequent development activities. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution No. 95- with Exhibits "A-B", inclusive. Board of Supervisors Minute Order dated July 7, 1992. cc: Brad Buron, Maintenance Superintendent RESOLUTION NO. 9S- A RESOLIFfION OF ~ CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECUI,~ 'CALIFORNIA, ACCJ~II~G CERTAIN SYSTEM (BU'rrl;RFf~ .n STAGE ROAD FROM RANCHO C~TJFORNIA ROAD TO DE PORTOLA ROAD) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEiVIECULA DOES REqOLVE, DETER/dINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: WHEgEAS, Bedford Development Corporation, a California Corporation, dedicated Lots "L" , "M" , and "N" in Parcel Map No. 23432, filed in Book 159, at Pages 38-61 Inclusive, of Parcel Maps, to public use for street and public utility purposes. Said Lots were accepted by '- the County of Riverside for vesting purposes only and not into the County Road-Maintained System. WItERF-AS, The Tomond Company, a California Corporation, offered for dedication Lot *E* in Tract No. 23125-1, filed in Book246, at Pages 81-85 Inclusive, of Maps, for street and public utility purposes. The City Council accepted said offer for public road and public utility purposes. -- WtItREAS, Won Sang Yoo and Insook Yoo dedicated Lots "A", "B", and "C" in Parcel Map No. 22429, filed in Book 147, at Pages 14-19 Inclusive, of Parcel Maps, for street and public utility purposes. Said Lots were accepted by Riverside County for vesting purposes and not into the County Road-Maintained System. WHERE,, Taylor Woodrow Homes Ltd., a California Corporation, dedicated Lot "A" in Tract No 23143-1, filed in Book 241, at Pages 79-88 Inclusive, for street and public utility purposes. The City Council accepted said offer for public road and public utility purposes. Said Lot "A" lies over a portion of said Lot 'C" of Parcel Map No. 22429. WHEREAS, TAYCO, a California General Partnership, dedicated Lot "B" in Tract No 22715-1, fried in Book 205, at Pages 1-5 Inclusive, Lot "B" in Tract No. 22715-1, fried in Book 205, at Pages 59-65 Inclusive, Lot "B" in Tract No. 22715, filed in Book 206, at Pages 75-79 Inclusive, Lot "A" in Tract No. 22915-2, filed in Book 217, at Pages 51-59 Inclusive, and Lots "A" and "B" in Tract 22916-3, filed in Book 225, at Pages 57-64 Inclusive, all to public use for street and public utility'purposes. Riverside County and the City Council accepted these Lots for public road and public utility purposes. WHI<uF-~kS, The City of Temecula became successors-in-interest to the County of Riverside upon Incorporation, effective December 1, 1989. WHER]~S, The Assessment District No. 159 contractor has completed the public improvements in accordance with the plans, specifications, and standards, and the Board of Supervisors has issued the Notice of Completion for this phase of work; r3AGDRPl%9S~2S~BUTFLDRD.ACC WI~F:~zRIS, the Riverside County Translnrmtion Department has requested that the City of Temecula accept the completed work for maintenance purposes; ~F~AS, the City concurs in the satisfactory completion of the work along Butterfield Sta~e Road only and desires the acceptance of this street into the City Maintained-Street System: NOW, TBI~R!~ORE, BE 1T RESOLV!~ by the City Council of the City of Temecula as fonows: Section 1. That the City of Temecula accept into the City M~intained-Street System that street offered and accepted by the County of Riverside described in Exhibits 'A' and 'B' attached hereto. Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution and accept the '. street and portions thereof, offered to and accepted by the County of Riverside and the City Council, into the City Maintained-Street System as described in Exhibits 'A' and 'B' attached hereto. PASSRIJ, APPROVk~, AND ADOFrED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 28th day of March, 1995. Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor ATTEST: lunc S. ~eek City Clerk c'sAGD~vI~5~0~2S~UTM2)RD.ACC STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss ClTY OF TEMEClmA ,) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 95- was duly and re~larly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 28th day of March, 1995, by the following vote: AYES: 0 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCILMFJVIBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNTERS: COUNCH~MEMBERS: r:~AGD~eT~5~0~28~BUTM,.DI~D.ACC EXHIBIT "A' TO RESOLIJTION NO. 95- Accep'Inf the de4i,-fions for public road and public ut~ity purposes, as previously Branted to and accepted by the County of Riverside and by the City Cotmoil, nil as indicfte4 ma Eahlbit ~Bn, and accepting those portions of robjeer pubtic street lying within the City Limits into the City ~V[9|ntpined- Street System as decrHMd below:. A. Being Lots 'L", "M", and "N" in Parcel Map No. 23432, filed in Book 159, at Pages 38-61 Inclusive, of Parcel Maps. Said Lots were accepted for vesting purposes only by the County of Riverside. B. Being Lot "E" in Tract No. 23125-1, filed in Book 246, at Pages 81-85 Inclusive, of Maps. Said Lot being accepted by the City Council. C. Being Lots 'A" , "B" , and "C" in Parcel Map No. 22429, filed in Book 246, at Pages 14-19 Inclusive, of Parcel Maps. Said Lots were accepted by for' vesting purposes only by the County of Riverside. D. Being Lot "A" in Tract No. 23143-1, filed in Book 241, at Pages 79-88 Inclusive, of Maps. Said Lot was accepted by City Council. This Lot lies over a portion of Lot "C" of Parcel Map No. 22429. E. Being Lot "B" in Tract No. 22715-1, filed in Book 205, at Pages 1-5 inclusive. Said Lot was accepted by City Council. F. Being Lot "B" in Tract No. 22715-2, filed in Book 205, at Pages 59-65 Inclusive. Said Lot was accepted by City Council G. Being Lot "B" in Tract No. 22715, filed in Book 206, at Pages 75-79 Inclusive. Said Lot was accepted by City Council. H. Being Lot "A" in Tract No. 22915-2, filed in Book 217, at Pages 51-59 Inclusive. Said Lot as accepted by City Council. I. Being Lots "A" and "B" in Tract No. 22916-3, filed in Book 225, at Pages 57-64 Inclusive. Said lots were accepted by City Council. ALL PARCEl, MAPS AND TRACT MAPS NOTED ABOVE WERE FILED INTHE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CP, LWORNIA. c,,s. ODItlxI'k~Js.~28,dIUTPLDRD.ACC :.:xH:slT *B" TO ]~E~OLUTION NO. 95- ACCEPTANCE- H/BLIC S11t.EET INTO THE CrI1' MAINT~TItEET SYSTE~ AS INDICATED BI~-IOW: Z3it~-I Notice of ompletion :Civil Code S 3093 - Public Works: (For Recorder' s u.se) Notice is hereby iven by the undersigned. owner, .-a public entity of the State of Cal~fornia,'~hat a-public w~rk of improvement has - =. . .... .. :, :u..':.:-, .i-,,. .. been completecl, Is foll{:~8: .:..- :'.; .. ':' .,:.-,:::;2,.,::, '. '. -. .'.."- .' :, ::t.~ ,~ -.. ~ Address of owner: .4080 Le~0n Name of' contractor':.': '-"" -: ....-;-:.;.-, Street addresS".~: lega. II~. Project title or description, of work=' :."'Butt&'~:~'~'~i"dj.S~&_~'~ · ' " - . .. .... ~-:..: ........ :, .... ..~ '.~.:;-~,~ ..~.~.: · ~: ./.:,'. Im ovem ~, In 'the Temecula. areas%=;::; ..~:~,'~'~~ ..... :.:..,-'.. ~.~,~;7;:~";~ ,'-' :'- '-.. a.=. ~ ~.~?.~o.:....-:;.D.~.. of.-, t~..-,o~-'~ ~'::~:,'- :: ':'.-:~::':"' "j' :;f=~, .' '.;..- :,:.." ..- .,.'.-.., ,:,:... :.;-...,.....,:.... :-~b~::~.;:~-.;~;,..~:::~:.'.~.'-. U~..~.~82..,.-~r.:'..... ..=.~. ~ ~-.~ ,.." ~..ty..;:. ~.' :.:. ::;~,-=~..:..' ~::.,:~:::-:: .' ::~.::~::~ff~: :~::>;~:':::::~.~,-~2~: ;. v:~. ..' .... - ....-.;':.:-Sq: ....- ....-. :1-'l :',Wo' '- · :~" :'~f.:=~'-~" '''~- ,;'~:' -. .... " ' "' "' ' ...... ~(o,~a 9~1(; 7. ;::. ] '. ~"' ' Date~: Ju!y:'~7.,. 19 STATE OF C~tI ":':""':"' "' I am the- bO'ard:' of. ''·'' the vers:t:de~.~:; '~,-~...-'-~'-~.~.- -;"~:j-:~:"";"". ~ ....;~:~:~'; '~:'~:'~""':" :" en~i~~~e~e~...~e2. ~oregoing' ~~.'-: ~.~ on ~ose . . · the public ~~' '~nl~ . lai~ii.~~~ its~.~..' ' · ' eX:hive"rea "' i I oZ ~ ' behalf I -:-'-.'.'-:' ;'. ::;~'.: '~f-::: :-' ". ";' .':' 2~ ·r::~ ::~"~; ,' ..; ~ ;: ::~:,...... ....:;.~-. . ,- -- · '" ;'-.:' .' ;:Z~ ~ {:" :'-': '~. <" ~ ......-. ,, ~ .::'"''. ' .... ' ' .-: -,.':~: ";'T'~':.;-' :~..: :..':' ::,'. . :~ : .., '.' ~V '~.'- -;'~ .'::. '.:. '--:-,'-., ::.'..-:: ~ :,:L.:.::..:~f:~:':<.z-.;..~ ....; ....~:.;.,:..:.,.-..; ; -;"-". .....'..~.-;--;:. ~.:::~: ..,,:. ...~::" .. ./.~ .'- :. .:::: ..: ......,,..-. ::~.. ..... ., ~:~- . . .= .. . . . . ... : . .,. . .-.. . ~..-:, .... ., , .-,:. RD FORM 97 7//~/f,~-- ~. 7 ITEM 15 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: City Council/City Manager (~ZL Joseph Kicak, Interim Director of Public Works/City Engineer January 24, 1995 SUBJECT: Acceptance of Public Streets into the City Maintained-Street System (Portions of Butterfield Stage Road and De Portola Road) PREPARED BY: ~ Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 95-_ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS CONSTRUCTED UNDER ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 159 INTO THE CITY MAINTAINED-STREET SYSTEM (BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD FROM DE PORTOLA ROAD TO STATE HIGHWAY 79 (S) AND DE PORTOLA ROAD FROM BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD TO EASTERLY CITY UMITS) BACKGROUND: Rancho Villages Assessment District No. 159 was' formed under the provisions of the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 while under the jurisdiction of the County of Riverside. The Riverside County Transportation Department administers the construction contracts for Assessment District No, 159 through consultam contract administrators and inspectors, As each phase of work under the Assessment District program is completed, the consultants recommend acceptance of the work to the Transportation Department and then to the Board of Supervisors. The Board then accepts the recommendation and executes and has filed a "Notice of Completion". In the subject instance, the contract was administered and accepted by Rancho California Water District. r:~egdrpt~95~O328~BUTDEPES.ACC 0316951AKC The Assessment District contractor has satisfactorily completed Butterfield Stage Road from De Portola Road to State Highway 79 {S) and De PortoIs Road from Butterfield Stage Road to Easterly City Limits in accordance with County plans, specifications, and standards, The Rancho California Water District issued a Notice of Acceptance for the public improvements on January 30, 1995. The Riverside County Transportation Department has so notified the City of Temecula, and the City Public Works Department has reviewed the project in the field. The Riverside County Transportation Department requests that the City of Temecula accept the pertinent public improvements thereby accepting the maintenance responsibilities for the street improvements and for storm drainage facilities with pipe sizes 36-inches in diameter or less. The major storm drain structures and pipes in excess of 36-inch diameter will be maintained by Assessment District No 159 until the maintenance responsibilities are transferred to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District. The Public Works Staff recommends City Council acceptance of the right-of-way and: acceptance of the street and pertinent drainage improvements into the City Maintained-Street System. The portion of De Portola Road within the City Limits was granted to the County of Riverside on February 8, 1989 and then accepted by the County Road Commissioner for vesting purposes only and not for inclusion in the County maintained-road system, said acceptance recorded on February 22, 1989. Acceptance of the Street and pertinent Drainage improvements is recommended by Council Minute Action. Acceptance of the street into the City Maintained-Street System shall be by City Council Resolution in accordance with Streets and Highway Code Section No. 1806. FISCAL IMPACT: These streets will be integrated into the City's Pavement Management System and will receive periodic surface and/or structural maintenance efforts. The new pavement condition of these streets should necessitate only limited surface or structural treatments for 5 to 7 years. In addition some erosion control measures may be necessary until such time as the parkway improvements are completed through subsequent development activities. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution No. 95- with Exhibits "A-B", inclusive. Rancho California Water District "Notice of Acceptance" dated January 30, 1995. cc: Brad Buron, Maintenance Superintendent r:%egdrpt%95%O328%BUTDEPES.ACC 031695/AKC RE~LUTION NO. A I~.SOLlYrION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ACcEI-I1NG CERTAIN SYSTEM (Bl~Trl~m~t-D STAGE ROAD FROM DE PORTOLA ROAD TO HIGHWAY 79 6) AND DE PORTOLA ROAD FROM BU'rrEKFr~ ,n STAGE ROAD TO EASTERLY C1TY LlafiTS) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMF, C~ DOES RESOLVE, DB'rER/aNE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, The Riverside County Board of Supervisors by Resolution No. 89-251 on'. 1une 13, 1989, accepted certain offers of dedications for public roads as recorded December 5, 1975, as Instrument No. 151727 for portions of De Portoh Road and Butterfield. Stage Road. Said portions are shown on Parcel Map No. 6428, recorded in Book 20, Pages' 70 through 73 of Parcel Maps. Acceptance of often was for vesting purposes only and not into the County Road-Maintained System. WHEREAS, Bedford Development Company, a California C~tion, dedicated Lot "Q" (Butterfield Stage Road) in Par~ Map No. 23432, filed in Book 159, at Pages 38-61 Inclusive of Parcel Maps, to public use for street and public utility purposes. The County Road Said Lot *Q* was accepted by the Riverside County Surveyor and Road Commissioner on behalf of the Board of Supervisors for vesting purposes only and not into the County Maintained-Road System. WHEREAS, The Toman Company,a California Corporation, offered for dedication Lot "D" , (De Portoh Road), in Tract No. 23125-1, filed in Book 246, at Pages 81-85 Inclusive, of Maps, for public use for street and public uti;lity purposes. The City Council accepted said offer for public road and public utility purposes. WHEREAS, Kaufman and Broad of San Diego, Inc., a California Corporation, offered for dedication Lot 'A* , (De Portoh Road), in Tract No. 23125-3, filed in Book 252, at Pages 3947 Inclusive, for public use for street and public utility purposes. The Cit Council accepted said offer for public road and public utility purposes. ~, The City of Temecula became successors:m-interest to the County of Riverside upon Incorporation, effective December 1, 1989; WHEREAS, The Assessment District No. 159 contractor has completed the public improvements in accordance with the plans, specifications, and standards, and the Rancho California Water District has issued the Notice of Acceptance for this phase of work;, WNERF_AS, the Riverside County Transportation Department has requested that the City of Temeeula accept the completed work for maintenance purposes; r:~agdrpt~95~0328~,BUTDEPES.ACC 0316951AKC W!~Eul~-&S, the City concurs in the satisfactory completion of the work and recommends the acceptance of these streets into the City Maintained-Street System: NOW, TItERI~-!~ORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Temecula as follows: Section 1. That the City of Temeatla accept into the City lVt~dntained-Street System : those streets offered and accepted by the County of Riverside, and offered and accepted by the City Council, described in Exhibits "A" and "B" ~tt~checl hereto. ..Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of thig resolution and accept the streets and portions thereof, offered to and accepted by the County of Riverside for vesting purposes only, and the City Council, into the City-maintained street system as described in Exhibits *A* and *B* attached hereto. PASSE!), APPROVEB, AND ADOFrED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 28th day of March, 1995. Jeffery E. Stone, Mayor ATFF, ST: June S. Greek City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALn~ORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TElVlECULA ) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 95- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecuh at a regular meeting thereof held on the 28th day of March, 1995, by the following COUNCILI~n~-MBBRS: COUN~HRS: COUNC~BRS: COUN~BRS: vote: AYES: 0 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 ABSTAIN: 0 r:~agdrpt~SS't0328~BUTDEPES.ACC 031695/AKC EXHIBIT "A" TO RESOLUTION NO. 95- Accepting those parcels dedicated to the public for public roads and/or streets and public utility purposes accepted for vesting purposes but not for road-maintained purposes by the County of Riverside, and those parcels dedicated to public use for street and public utility purposes and accepted by the City Council, all as indica'ted on Exhibit "B", into the City Maintained-Street System as described below: A. Those portions of Portola Road and Butterfield Stage Road lying within the City Limits of the City of Temecula, as described in instrument No. 151727, recorded December 5, 1975, and shown on Parcel Map No. 6428, recorded in Book 20, Pages 70 through 73, of Parcel Maps and as accepted for vesting purposes only by Riverside County Resolution No. 89-251, all recorded in the office of the County Recorder, Riverside County, California. B. Lot "Q" in Parcel Map No. 23432, filed in Book 159, at Pages 38-61 Inclusive, of Parcel Maps, said Lot "Q" being accepted by the County of Riverside for vesting purposes only. C. Being Lot "D" in Tract No. 23125-1, filed in Book 246, at Pages 81-85 Inclusive, of Maps, in the office of the County Recorder, Riverside County, California. D. Being Lot A" in Tract No. 23125-3, filed in Book 252, at .Pages 39-47 Inclusive, of Maps, in the office of the County Recorder, Riverside County, California. r:%egdq~t%95~O328%BUT!)EPES.ACC 0316951AKC EXHIBIT 'B' TO RESOLUTION NO. 95~__ SUBJECT ACCEPTANCE- PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY-MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM AS INDICATED BELOW: .,I , :, -/ ~15 AT%eHT~, LI~, ' STATE I ,v?a,*,~..a Rsn~o Califomis Water Dbtria Post Office B~ 9017 Tcm~ula, CA 92589-9017 NOTICe-~OF ACCI~FANC~. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVt~ BY RANCHO CALIFO~ WATER DISTRICT, A PUBLIC CORPORATION, PURSUANT TO SECTION 1192.10F TH!~ CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, THAT: The proira:t, ~q.~rnent Distria No. 159, Butv-~ield Sts~ Rosd, [Ii~hwsy 79 and De Ponola Road-East, Phss~ I (Projea No. D0~), wss ~ by the Ran~ho California Wat~ District on January 10, 199f; The name of the mnuaaor is Utah Pacifi~ S. Th~ name of the surety is Sa/v~ Insurance Company of Amcri2; The de. smp~on of the p,~p~ ~, or public work or ~ is: Street improvm, ent, storm drain, Sradin& water and sewer. RANCRO CAI,WORNIA WATgR DISTRICT Da~:.Jmnnmr~ ~0,1qq~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA } COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE} John F. Hep-i~r ' ~ I am the General Ma~aF.r of the Rancho California Water Distri~ a public corporation, nnd as such tnnlz this veti~ation for and on behaff of said ganc~ Califtm~ Water District, I have read dz f~mgoing Noti~ of ~ptance and know the contents thereof, and the facts therein stated are true. I declare trader p~nalty of pro'jury thax the foregoing is rose and correct. ~~d on auuaz~ 30,1995 · at Temecula, ~,, I msebOlO/a~l-IU,/D04.14 John F. H~s't~~m~'d~ C, en~ral Manager -CAMFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE AGKN~ENT and' t~e~ to~m/m~~e/they executed the i ~ eme~tdlt~;i, m, dl~'lu,41 ~ asksrid by ~mmmmmmmm~e WffN~myhmndmndol~cimlmmmL mllllmmllNIslm OPTIOll4I, Description of Attac~ Doc~ Signm4s) Otmr ~ Named Above: - Capaclty(i'it) Claimed by $1g.ner~. Signers Name: ,,TbA~ ~'- ~ oc~.xme .O~k:er r TlUe(s): ~;mq4,mr [] Attomey-in-Fect - (:] AU~;rJy I&~ Fact (:) Guardian or C4Naeeve Signer Is Fiepelsenting: Signer Is rlmFrmmm 41r; : mammm, mmm, ll~' Ilemme. falllil~m 1~ ITEM 16 APPROVAl ~ CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFIC [] CITY MANAGE CITY OF TEMECULA AOENDA REPORT FROM: DATE: City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer March 28, 1995 SUBJECT: Acceptance of Public Street into the City Maintained-Street System (De Portola Road-Margarita Road to Butterfield Stage Road) PREPARED BY: ~'~!bert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 95~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREET CONSTRUCTED UNDER ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 159 INTO THE CITY MAINTAINED-STREET SYSTEM (DE PORTOLA ROAD FROM MARGARITA ROAD TO BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD) BACKGROUND: Rancho Villages Assessment District No. 159 was formed under the provisions of the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 while under the jurisdiction of the County of Riverside. The Riverside County Transportation Department administers the construction contracts for Assessment District No. 159 through consultant contract administrators and inspectors. As each phase of work under the Assessment District program is completed, the consultants recommend acceptance of the work to the Transportation Department and then to the Board of Supervisors. The Board then accepts the recommendation and executes and has filed a "Notice of Completion". The Assessment District contractors have satisfactorily completed the construction of De Portola Road from Margarita Road to Butterfield Stage Road in accordance with County plans, specifications, and standards. The Board of Supervisors authorized the issuance of the Notice of Completion for the first phase of public improvements on April 2, 1991. The second or final phase of public improvements (Cap course of aspheltic concrete paving) was constructed under Rancho California Water District (RCWD) jurisdiction/administration in order to expedite the completion and presentation of improvements to the City of Temecula. The Riverside County Transportation Department has so notified the City of Temecula, and the City Public Works Department has reviewed the project in the field. The Riverside County Transportation Department requests that the City of Temecula accept the pertinent public improvements thereby accepting the maintenance responsibilities. The Public Works Staff recommends City Council acceptance of the right-of-way and acceptance of the Street and Drainage improvements into the City Maintsined-Straet System. The County of Riverside previously accepted the offer of dedication for street and public utility purposes for this portion of De Portola Street for vesting purposes only and not into the County Maintained-Road System. Acceptance of the Street and Drainage improvements is recommended by Council Minute Action. Acceptance of the street into the City Maintained-Street System shall be by City Council Resolution in accordance with Streets and Highway Code Section No. 1806. FISCAL IMPACT: This street will be integrated into the City's Pavement Management System and will receive periodic surface and/or structural maintenance efforts, The new pavement condition of this street should necessitate only limited surface or structural treatments for 5 to 7 years. In addition some erosion control measures may be necessary until such time as the parkway improvements are completed through subsequent development activities. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution No. 95- with Exhibits "A-B", inclusive. Board of Supervisors Minute Order dated April 2, 1991. Rancho California Water District "Notice of Acceptance" dated January 30, 1995. Rancho California Water District Contract Change Order No. 34 cc: Brad Buron, Maintenance Superintendent 1H~,OLUTION NO. 9~- A RF.,~LUTION OF THE C1TY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TI~iECULA, C~LIFORNIA, ACCIa-t~IG CERTAIN STREETS INTO THE C1TY MAINT~TREET SYSTEM (DE PORTOLA-ROAD FROM MARGARITA ROAD TO BU'rrERFIEtD STAGE ROAD) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF Tt~i~CULA DOES RESOLVE, DETER,MINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, Bedford Development Company, a California Corporation, dedicated for street and public utility purposes that portion of 'Road Easement' demarcated as "De Ponoh Road" on Parcel Map 23432 filed in Book 159 of Parcel Maps, at pages 38-61 Inclusive, in the office of the County Recorder, Riverside County, California; said *Road Easement" being accepted by the Riverside County Board of Supervisors for vesting purposes only but not into the County Maintained-Road System. WHEREAS, The City of Teme~ula became suo:essors-in'interest to the County of Riverside upon Incorporation, effective December 1, 1989. WHEREAS, The Assessment District No. 159 contractors have completed the public improvements in accordance with the plans, specifications, and standards. W!tF~REAS, The Riverside County Board of Supervisors has issued the Notice of Completion for the first phase of work; WHEREAS, The Rancho California Water District has issued a "Notice of Acceptance* for the second and final phase of work; WHEREAS, the Riverside County Transportation Department has requested that the City of Temecula accept the completed work for maintenance purposes; WIllIEAS, the City concurs in the satisfactory completion of the work and desires the acceptance of this street into the City Maintained-Street System: NOW, THI~RE, BE If RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Temecula as follows: Section 1. That the City of Temecula accept into the City Maintained-Street System that street offered and accepted by the County of Riverside described in Exhibits "A" and attached hereto. Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution and accept the street and portions thereof, offered to and accepted by the County of Riverside, into the City Maintained-Street System as described in Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto. r.'~AGDIG~T~9S~0328'~,DHPORTOL WST 0~IglAK. C PASSED, APPROVI~, AND ADOFf!~, by the City Council of the City of Temecuh at a regular meeting held on the 28th day of March, 1995. Jeffrey Stone, Mayor ATI'EST: June S. Greek City Clerk [sr~] STATE OF CAIJFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 95- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecuh at a regular meeting thereof held on the 28th day of March, 1995, by the following vote: AYES: 0 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMBMBERS: COUNTERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: r.~g3D~2S~DBYORTOLWST O~lff~lAi~C EXHIBIT "A" TO RESOLUTION NO. 95- Acceptinl the "Road F~,-nents" for public road and public utility purposes, as previously Branted to the County of Riverside and accepted for vesting purposes only, all as indicated on Exhibits "As and "B", into the City Maintained-Street System as described below: That portion of that "Road Easement" dedi~ted for street and public utility purposes and demarcated as De Portoh Road on Parcel Map 23432 filed in Book 159 of Parcel Maps, at Pages 38-61, inclusive, in the Office of the County Recorder, Riverside County, California; said *Road Easement" was accepted by the Riverside County Board of Supervisors for vesting purposes only but not into the County Maintained Road System. ~:xHislT "B" TO RE~OLUTION NO. 9~. : r:~&GDKP'I*~'~ia~DHPORTOLWST (BI~AXC z;Ia~ID1T *B* TO RESOLUTION NO. 9S' SUBJECT ACCEFrANCE- FUBLIC STI~r INTO ~ CITY MAINTAINII)*SI~I~rr SYSTEM AS INDICATED BELOW --Z, (For Recorder's use) a public entity improvement has- Notice of Completion Zi~il Code ~ 3093 -' Public Works] Notice is hereby ~iven by the undersigned owner, >f the State of California,. that a public work of completed, as followsz · · project title or description of work: Construct Deportola Road , ' ;' Margarita Roa~ =o Butterfield Stage_Road Date of completion: Date' of this ~otice· .. . ::.. . - ..] .: .. . .. ~.. ~'~ure of ~er: ~unt~.~ . :' '].... .'.' ' ~]~J~j lnterest or estate-of]Met: .Fub!.~c Roadway '... Street Address of cn~ner~ 4080 Lemon' St. 8th Floor' .Riverstde'Califorantl 92501 = .. · ' .:...:..: . . "::. L .i:-'~j .'-': Wk-,, Reeoraa,~ leturn m: Raucho California Water District Post Office Box 90~7 Teme~ula, CA 92~89-90~7 NOTleg OF ACC~TANCR NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVl~ BY RANCHO CALIFO~ WATER DISTRICT, A .. PUBLIC CORPORATION, PUR.qU~TO SECTION 1192.10F TH~ CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, THAT: 1. The proje~, Aue~ment District No. 159, Butterfield Stage Road, Highway 79 and De Ponoh Road-East, Phn~e I (Project No. D0484), was accepted by the Ratwho California Water District on January 10, 1995; The name of the contraaor is Utah Pacific; 3. The name of the surety is Safeco Insurance Company of Amerim; Tho description of the l~ol~.ty or public work or structure is: Street hnprovcment, storm drain, grading, water and sewer. RANClIO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT Dat~: .,TmnramTI[ ~L0 · 1 qqq STATE OF CAt.IFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) .Olmerai Manager I am' the General Manager of the Rancho Cadifomia Water Disuict, a public corponltion, and as such make this verifi~tion for and on behalf ~ said Rancho California Water Districtl I have read the foregoing Notice of Acceptance and know the contents thered, and the f'acu therein stated are true. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. ~xc~*uted on Jauuaz~ 3 O ,L995 · at Temecula, Chlifnrnia. L Dis Id~010/AIXe- 1 a/I)O06 C~n~ral Manager CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE .AQIUdOWLEDOMENT . .-.y.~-~ ~---~ ?~ .... ~-Z--_::-~ -~, ~ ';' '; '~ -~" ~ ~ ~ ~ .... ' .... ........... ~r,-,c,~ ~,,,/Ps ,,/o ,",,,rs-, rc, '~:Ueor~of(:~x:umerd:/~o-/",e.~' OF Document Date: ~ - ,.~/ /'~-~" Num~r of Pages: / Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: - sagnets N,m,- -:7~-,-) ~ ~'-" ~ He, e- '~s)- ~:"~ ,e,,F-/,,~gme- Tree(s): ral [] Attorney-in-Fact · ~ ~ o,,,4;,deM,eawy~amad,n.aaen,wmm~,,e..P,o.k, nu,cameeP,&CAtmff'e4 i,,LNe. aW ~/~,personally known to rrm - Cn whose nam~ subvJtb s to the within instrument and .- ~lJJia ~o me ~C~e4hey e:mc-'le,'J the falrne~s~erAhc, il' authorized apeoity(ibe~and ...... ,.~e'~ ' ' 't ~:~ni~r signmum(s) on _~3l~Jte~ the Instrument. Description of Attached Decument ITEM 17 30: .~,PPROVAI- CITY ATTORNEY . CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager FROM: (~ Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: March 28, 1995 SUBJECT: Accept Public Improvements in Tract No. 21760 PREPARED BY: ~k, lbert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council accept the public improvements in Tract No 21760, authorize reduction in Faithful Performance Bond amounts for streets, water, and sewerimprovements, accept the Faithful Performance warranty bond in the reduced amount, and direct the City Clerk to so notify the Developer and Surety. BACKGROUND: The City Council received and filed the map for Tract No. 21760 on June 12, 1990. Subdivision Agreements and Surety Bonds were posted with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors by: Rancho Highlands Venture I for the improvement of streets, sewer and water system, and subdivision monumentation. Accompanying the Subdivision Agreements were surety Bonds, issued by Insurance Company of the West as follows: 2. 3. 4. 5. Bond No. 1159341 in the amount of $1,236,000to cover street improvements. Bond No. 1159341 in the amount of $227,500to cover water improvements. Bond No. 1159341 in the amount of $238,500 to cover sewer improvements. Bond No. 1159342 in the amount of $38,800 to cover subdivision monumentation. Bond No. 1159341 in the amounts of $618,250, $113,750, and $119,250, respectively, to cover street, water, and sewer material and labor. -1- r:~agdtptL95\O3:28~rl1760.acc 0316951akc On April 28, 1992, the CityCo,Jncil authorized a reduction in street, water, and sewer Faithful Performance Bond amounts, approved a replacement Subdivision Improvement Agreement and accepted surety bonds, as posted by St, Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, in the reduced amounts as follows: 1. Bond No. 400JG7702 in the amount of $276,000 to cover remaining street im provemerits. 2. Bond No. 400JG7702 in the amount of $45,500 to cover remaining water improvements 3. Bond No, 400JG7702 in the amount of $48,000 to cover remaining sewer improvements, Additionally, the surety replaced Material and Labor and Subdivision Monumentation in the full '- amounts as follows: 1. Bond No. 400JG7702 in the amounts of $618,250, $113,750, and $119,250, respectively to cover street, water, and sewer material and labor. 2. Bond No. 400JG7703in the amount of $38,800to cover subdivision monumentation. The new developer/owner is: WRI Rancho Highlands Venture, a California Limited Partnership c/o Weyerhaueser Venture Company 21515 Hawthorne Boulevard, Suite 310 Torrance, CA 90503 Staff has inspected and verified the public improvements. The Eastern Municipal and Rancho California Water Districts have accepted their items of work. The Public Works Department therefore recommends acceptance of the public improvements, reduction in Faithful Performance Bond amounts to the ten-percent warranty level, and initiation of the one-year warranty period. Therefore it is appropriate to reduce the Faithful Performance Bond amount as follows: Street, Water, and Sewer Improvements $199,250 The subdivider is submitting a rider to the Faithful Performance Bond in the following amount: Street, Water, and Sewer Improvements Bond No. 400JG7702 $170,250 The developer was required to post Material and Labor bonds to ensure payment to suppliers and workers, These bonds are maintained in effect for a period of time determined by the Subdivision Improvement Agreement after the City Council has accepted the improvements. The Subdivision Monument Bond will be recommended for release following final inspection and approval of the Monuments and related work. -2- r:.~qdqs%95M]328~'21760acc 03169S/aim The affected streets are being accepted into the City Maintained-Street System by City council Resolution No. 95- at this time. The streets within the subdivision are Corte Rialto, Via Fanira, Via Mondo, Calls Nacido, Corte Col}a, and portions of Tierra Vista Road, Preece Lane, and Corte Fresca. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: 1. Location Map 2. Faithful Performance Warranty Bond (On file) -3- r:.~sZd~pt~95~O328~r21760.mcc 0316951skc Project 4 NI6WWAY Project ,, vt® lie ~ ,,, ,..,, y/C'/,4//2"J/ ·. i;=,,, mours TR ACT NO. 9, 1760 l,ocation Map ITEM 18 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Council f Ronald E..Bradley, City Manager March 28, 1995 Contract Amendment - Kicak and Associates RECOMMENDATION: Approve an amendment to the Kicak and Associates contract. BACKGROUND: On September 20, 1994, the City entered into a contract with Joe Kicak, of Kicak and Associates, to provide Interim Director of Public Works/City Engineer services while a recruitment was conducted to fill the position on a permanent basis. The recruitment, for the Director of Public Works/City Engineer position, took longer than anticipated; therefore, the City needed services from~Kicak and Associates for longer period of time. The Contract was for an amount not to exceed 125,000for the total term of the agreement. Including the additional time spent as Interim Director, the work totaled 136,000. Therefore, a contract amendment for 111,000 is required. FISCAL IMPACT: There are adequate funds available in account 100-164-604-5250 for this contract amendment. The amount required for the contract services will be offset by savings in the line item for salaries. AMENDMENT TO AG~ FOR PROFESSIONAL SBRVICES This First Amendment is dated as of March 28, 1995, by and between the City of Temecula and Kicak and Associates. The Agreement dated September 20, 1994, between the City of Temecula, and Kicak and Associates, (hereinaeer refeffed as "~ent*) is hereby amended as fonows: RE: Interim Director of Pubtic Works/City Engim~ Services Section 2 The Scope of Work will remain the same. Section 3 Compensation for services mh~ll be toUd compensation of all services described in the Amendment and sludl be payable not to exceed $36,000 for Interim Director of Public Works/City Engineer services. Section 4 All other tens and conditions of the Agreement shall remnin the same. CONTRACTOR The parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the dale and year above written. C1TYOFTEMECUI~ By: By: Kicak and Associates Ronald E. Bradley City M~n~ger APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter Thorson, ~ Attorney ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk R:~alq~I~DAKr, AK.MiS ~1/~ ITEM 19 ORDINANCE NO. 9S-06 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TI~IECULA BEPEALING SF, C~ON 6.04.010 AND ADDING CIL4kFrERS 6.02, 6.06 AND 6.08 TO THE TI~fECL~ MUNICIPAL CODE RF~ULATING ~ ~cE~:PL~G AND CONTROL OF DOGS, CATS AND OTHER ANIMALS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TBivlF, EULA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 1.08.020 of the Temecula Municipal Code is amended to remove Ordinance 534 from the list of County Ordinances adopted by reference. Section 2. Chapter 6.02 is added to the Temeeula Municipal Code to read as follows: "Chapter 6.02. Ke~i}ing ,,rid controlling hogs ,,rid C~ts: Control and Suppression of Rabies. Section 6.02.010. ne~nitions. Whenever, in this Chapter or in any resolutionor standard adopted by City Council puntant to this Chapter, the following terms are used, they shall have the meaning ascribed to them in this Section, unless it is appsrent from the context thereof that some other meaning is intended. A. ' Animsl Rescuer" means any individual who routinely obtains a dog or cat from the rightful owner of said animal, or any animal from an animal shelter that has been B. "At I ~r~e" means any dog which is off the premises of its owner, custodian or caretaker and which is not under physical restraint by a leash of a size and material appropriate to the size and temperament of the dog and which is held by a person capable of restraining such dog, or is not otherwise physically restrained by some other device or instrumentality, except that such device or instrumentnllty shall not include voice control, eye control or signal control of the dog by any person, device or instrumentality. C. "C'~ttery" means any building, structure, enclosure or ~ses whereupon, or within which, ten (10) or more cats, four (4) months of age or older, ar~ !zpt or maintained. D. "Chief Animsl Control Officer" means the Chief Animal Contwl Office of the City. City my contract with the County of Riverside or any other public or private agency to serve as the Chief Animal Control Officer. Otd, 95Oi I E. "Cls~ I Kennel" means any building, ~tv,_cture, enclosure or premisel whereupon, or within which, five (5) to ten (10) dogs, four months of age or older, are kept F. *C!~.t~ H Kennel* means any building, structure, enclosure or premises whereupon, or within which, eleven (11) or more dogs, four (4) months of age or older, are G. 'Guide r}og* means any dog trained or being reared, trained or used for the purpose of guiding a blind person. H. sH~lth Officer" means the Health Officer of the County of Riverside or his duly autho~d re~p, cs;.atafive. '. I. *Impounded* means having been received into the custody of any animal control center, animal control officer, animal control vehicle or peace officer duly authorized by the City of Temecula to receive such animal. J. 'Person' mmns any individual, firm, Imtmmhip, joint venture, corporation, association, club or organization. K. "Public t~.ntity" means any state, or public subdivision, municipal corporation or agency th~f. L. *Sentry r}og'" means any dog U'ained to work without supervision in a feaced facih'ty and to deter and deUtin unauthorized persons found within the facility. The term "guard dog' shall also mean 'sentry dog*. M. "Service Dog," means any dog being reared, trained or used for purposes of ridfilling the particular requirements of a physically disabled person including but not limited to minimal protection work, rescue work, pulling a wheelchair or fetching dropped item. N. "Signal Bog," means any dog trained or being reared or trained or used for the purpose of alerting a deaf person or a person whose heating is impaired, to intruders or sounds° "Unlicensed r}og," means any dog for which no valid license is currently in P. 'Unnltered nnd Un~llayed" means a condition that exists in an animal which permits the producing of offspring. A dog or cat that has not been spayed or neutered. Q. "V~e~ina~on" means inoaxlation against rabies of any dog or cat, four (4) months of age or older, with any canine presajbed for the purpose of the California R. "Veterinnflnn" means a person holding a currently valid license to practice veterinary medicine issued by the 8ts,~ of California pursuant to Chapter 11 of the California B~n_aq and Professions Code. S. 'Vicious hog/Vicious r'-~t' means any dog or cat which-has bitten a person or -animal without provocation or direction or which has a disposition or propensity to attack or bite any person or animal without provocation or direction. Section 6.02.020. Mandatory Dog T,icensing nnd Vaccination. A. Except as provided in Section 6.02.040 A, it shall be unlaw~~ for any person to own, harbor, or keep any dog, four (4) months of age or older, within the City of Temecula, for a period longer than thirty (30) days, unless a currently valid license tag has been issued by Chief Animal Control Officer. B. It shall be unlawful for any person to own, harbor or keep any dog, four (4) months of age or older, within the City of Temecula, for a period longer than thirty (30) days, which has not been v~ccin~ted against rabies. Every person in the City of Temecula who owns, harbors or keeps any dog over four (4) months of age for a period longer than thirty (30) days shah have such dog vaccination shah be renewed in aceordanee with the applicable laws and regulations of the State of California. C. Each veterinarian after vnccinnting any dog shah sign a certificate of vaccination in duplicate in the form required by the Chief Animal Control Officer. The veterinarian shall keep on (1) copy and shnll give one (1) copy to the owner of the vaccinated dog and the owner shall retain such copy in his possession. D. The Chid Animal ConU'ol Officer shall issue a license only upon presentation of a certificate of vaccination indicating therein that the date of expiration of the vaccination immunity is not earlier than the date of expiration of the license being issued or renewed, upon payment of the applicable license fee specified in Section 6.02,020 F provided, however, that where the vaccinated dog is between the ages of four (4) months and twelve (12) months, the period d vaccination immunity required for licensing shall be as specified in Tifie 17, California Admini_sU'a~ve Code, Section 2606.4. E. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 6.02.020B and D, in the event a dog has a short-term illness, is pregnant or suffers from a long term debilitnting illness which in the opinion of a veterinarian contraindicates vaccination for rabies, such dog shall not be required to undergo vaccination during the period of such illness or pregnancy where a request for vaccination deferral has been approved by the Chief Animal Control Officer. Such request shall specify the duration of the requested tiefermi, and shall be signed by a veterinarian. The Chief Animal Control Officer shall issue a license for such dog upon onls 95-4~ 3 approval of the request for vnc~inn"on defenal and payment for the applicable license fee specified in Section 6.02.020 F. The owner and person having custody of such dog shall confine and shall keep such dog copfined, for the duntim of the de, fermi. Within fourteen (14) days after the expimtion of thc deferml, the owner or person having custody of such dog shall present the Chief Animal Control Officer a certificate of vnt,cin~tion in accordance with the provisions of this Section. F. Subject to the provisions of this Section, .cen,es shah be issued upon payment of the applicable fee as set by City Council Resolution adopted following a public hemring noticed as required by State Law. G. No fee shall be required for a license for any guide dog, signal dog or service dog, if such dog is in the possession and under the contwl of, in the case of a guide dog, a blind person, or in the case of a signal dog, a deaf or heating-'h-npaired, or service dogs for the physically disabled. H. No fee shall be required for a lic~___se for any dog owned by a public entity. I. Each license specified in this Section shall be valid for the period specified in Section 6.02.020 F shall be renewed within thirty (30) days after such period terminates, except that where the current v-arclnntlon for the dog which is the subject of the.license ~n11. expire prior to the expintion date of the license being applied for, the Chief Animal Control" Officer may upon request of the owner or custodian of such dog bacird__n_te such license so that its expiration date occurs concurrently with or prior to the expiration date of the vnccinntlon; provided, however, that where such b~chtstlng is performed, there shall be no reduction or discount of the license fee applicable to the license applied for, and such license shall be renewed within thirty (30) days after the date of its expiration. J. Whenever a dog validly licensed under this Chapter shah have died more than three (3) months before the expiration date of the license, the owner of such dog may return the license tag to the Chief Animal Contwl Officer, accompsnied by a statement signed by a veterinarian or a declaration signed under penalty of perjury by the owner, indicating that such dog is dead and specifying the date of death. In such event, the license shall be canceled and a pro-rata credit of the license fee by ftdl calendar quarten of the original license period remaining after the death of the dog my be applied during said remsininL period to the license fee for another dog acquired by the same owner. K. Upon transfer of ownership of any dog vafidly ficensed under this Chapter, the new owner shall notify the Chief Animal Control Officer, accompanied by a transfer fee as . set by Council Resolution. L. Notwithstnnding the provisions of Section 6.02.020 A, where a person moves into the City of Temecula from another community who owns a dog which is currently v~ccin~ted a2ainst rabies and for which dog a license was issued by such other community, Onis95-06 4 such li_~__~ shall be deemed valid for a period of one (1) year from the date such person moves into the City, or the date of expiration of the license issued by the other community, whichever is earlier. If an application for a license from the Chief Animal Control Officer is made more than thirty (30) days after such license is required, the applicant shall pay the applicable lain fee. ' M. Upon request of the Chief Animal Control Officer, any owner of a dog for which a license is required under the provisions of this Chapter shall present to the Chief Animal Control Officer a currently valid certificate of rabies vaccination or license tag. N. It shall be unlawful for any person to mnlm use of a stolen, counterfeit or unauthorized license, tag, certificate or any other document or thing for the purpose of evading the provisions of this Chapter. Section 6.09.025: Conu'ol of Un~l~tyed snd Unsltered Cats. It shah be unlawful for any penon who owns, harbon, or lzeps any unspayed or unaltez~ cat four (4) months of age or older within the City to allow or permit such unspayed or unaltered cat to be or remain outdoon. Section 6.02.030. Intentionally Omitted. Section 6.(Y2,040. Msndatory Licensing of Kennels and Cmtteries. A. No person sbnll operate or maintain a iznnel or a cattery without first obtaining an appropriate license thereof from the Chief Animal Control Officer. Such license shall be valid for a period of either one (1) or (2) years from the date of issuance, except that the Chief Animal Control Officer may, in his discretion, limit the duration of the license to one (1) year when he deems such limitations to be appropthte. Said license shall be renewed within thirty (30) days after the date of expiration. Where a lumnel ficense has been issued and is in effect, the dogs contained in such kennel shall be exempt from the requirements of individual license tags as provided in Section 6.02.020 A. The kennel license fees and late fees, ff an application for a license is made more than thirty (30) days after the date such license is required, shall be set pursuant to City Council Resolution adopted foliowing a public hearing noticed as required by State Law. B. Application for a knmel or catin7 license shall be ~ed with the Chief Animal Control Officer on a form plzsc~bed by him not later than ten (10) days aftff obtaining written verification from the City of Temecula's Planning Departmeat that the opention of the Imrmel or cattery is in compliance with the applicable provisions of the City land use and zoning ordinances. Said application form, when completed, ~Sll conlain such information as may reasonably be required by the Chief Animal Control Officer for the purposes of enforcement of this Chaptear, including but to limited to the current home telephone numbear Onis 95-06 Where a kennel or cattery is sought to be operated uptmleasedorrentedpremi--es~, aletterof consent from the owner of the premisesto the effect that the inmnel or cattery may be Officer at the time the appfication for the kennel or cattery license is submitted. C. After receipt of a kennel or caUery license application, the Chief Animal Control Officer shall make an inspection of the premises of the kennel or catlay for which a ficense is requested. No kennel or caUay ricerise shall be issued nor shall any such ficense Contwl Officer, sstinfies the applicable hws and regulations of the State of California, the appficable ordinances of the City of Temecula and the appficable conditions set forth in the Standards for Kennels and C~tteries. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Chapter, the Chief Animal Control Officer or the City Plnnnlng ~ may, in their respective discretion, limit the numbers of dogs or cats over the age of four (4) months which are kept application for renewal of a kennel or cattery license is considered. D. Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, the Chief Animal Control Officer is hereby authorized to enter upon and inspect the premises of any kennel or cattery located in the City of Temecula for the purpose of determining whether such kennel or cattery is in compliance with the provisions of _this Chapter and the Standards for Kennels and Canedes. As a condition of the issuance of a kennel or cattery license, each owner and operator d a kennel or catlevy sb~, agree to allow such entry and inspection and such agreement shall be made a pan of the ficense appfication. Such inspections ~,n be made during reasonable hours when the owner or operator of the kennel or cartcry is present on the kennel or cattery premises, and with such frequency as the Chief Animal Control Officer shall deem appropriate, and such inspections may, at the discretion of the Chief Animal Control Officer, be made without prior notice to the owner or operator of the subject kennel or cattery. Willful refusal on the pan of a kennel or cattery owner or operator to allow such inspection shall be grounds for summary denial of an application for a kennel or cattery license or for sumnaty suspension or revocation of a kennel or cattery license. E. A nonprofit corporation formed pursuant to the provision of the California Corporations Code commencing with Section 10400, for the prevention of cruelty to shims,Is, shall not be required to pay a fee for the licenses requital by Section 6.02,040 A provided, however, that all other provisions of Section 6.02,020 B and Section 6.02,040 A shall be applicable to any such nonprofit cotpomPon. F. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 6.02.040 C, and Section 6.(r2.050 A, a kennel or cattery which is in operation on the effective date of this Chapter and for which on such date there is in effect a current and otherwise valid license issued prior to OeisgS-06 6 April 4, 1987 pursuant to the provision of Riverside County Ordinance No. 455, shatl, until April 4, 2007 be teqtdred to comply only with those requirements for licensure and openlion G. The City Council shall adopt by Resolution standards for the operarico of all kennels and callcries. Section 6.02.050. I3enin!. Supsion snd Revot'~on of Kennel or C'~ttely license. A. The Chief ,animal Control ~ may, in his discretion, deny any application or suspend or revoiz any license for a lznnel or cattery if he finds that a lamnel or cattery fails to meet any or all of the Smdards for Kennels and Catteries referred to in Section 6.02.040 C, or is in viohtion of any hw of the State of California or any provim'on of this Chapter. B. When such denial, suspension or revocation occurs, the Chief Animal Control Officer shall prepare a written notice of such denial, suspension or revocstion which shall contain a brief statement of the reason or reasons for such denial, suspension or revocation. The Chief Animal Control Officer shah serve such notice upon the applicant or licensee by hand delivery or by registn'~ or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requestet. Denial, suspension or revocation shall be effective thirty (30) days after service of such notice. Where an application for a kennel or cattery liceme is denied or where a kennel or cattery license issued pursuant to this ordinance is suspended or revoked, no application for a new license for such kennel or cartcry shall be considered for a period of one (1) year from the effective date of such denial, suspension or revocation; provided, however, that for good cause shown the City Council may direct that there be a lesser period of time before such application will be considered. C. Any person whose application has been denied or whose license has been suspended or revoked, may appeal such denial, suspension or revocation by filing with the City Clerk within fifteen (15) days after notice of such denial, suspension or revocation, a written notice of appeal briefly setting forth the reasons why the appellant alleges such denial, suspension or revocation is impwper. Within five (5) days of the receipt by the City Clerk of such notice of appeal, the Cierk shall set a hearing date for the appeal and shall give written notice of the date, time and place of such hearing to the appellant, and such notice shall be sent by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested. The date of heating shall be not less than twenty (20) days from the date of mailing of the notice of the date, time and place of the hearing, and the hearings shall be conducted not later than forty-five (45) days from the date of mailing of the notice of denial, suspension or revocation; pwvided, however, that at the request of the appellant, the City Clerk may Ords~-0~ 7 technical rules w, lating to evidence and wimesses, as applicable in courts of hw. To be ~dmi.~sible, evidence shall be of the type upon which respondble persons are accustomed to rely in the conduct of serious affairs. During the peudeucy of the appeal, there shall be in effect an automatic my of the denial, suspeusiou or revocation; provided, however, that during said period of peadency the Chief Anhual Control Officer may take such action as he deems appzop, late uuder this Chapter or any other provisiou of law resl~g the subject kennel or cattery, including but not limited to the abatement of public nuisances, inspection of the kennel or cartcry 1~, or the vfosex:tlou of any violation of this Chapter or any other provision of law not related to the failure of the subject kennel or cattery to be currently and otherwi~ validly liceused. Section 6.020.060. Animnl Rescuer. A. Any Ira'son eu~aged in the xescue of animHm, mh.n first obtain a rescue pemit from Chief Animal Control Ofcer and shall meet all nmquimnmUs for a kenneYcattery license. B. The fee for a keuncl/cattcry permit as a zescue facility shall be as set by City-. Council Resolution adopted fonowing a public hearing noticed as required by Slate Law: C. An animal rescuer my ]zep a maximum of four (4) personal (not for adoption or sale) dogs and nine (9) personal (not for adoption or sale) cats and must include these animals as "pcrson~ pets' on the animal rescue permit application. In those cases where the person occupies from .5 to 1 acre, up to 6 dogs may be kept on the lxemimes. D. Personal dogs (not for adoption or sale) shall be individually liceused in accordance with this Chapter. E. A permitted rescuer obtaining animals from a shelter facility pursuant to Section 6.02.100 O shall not be subjea to the payment of impound fees and charges specified in Section 6.02.100 A but shall be subject to the spay/neuter deposit specified in Section 6.02.110 A. F. All rescued dogs and rescued cam older than four (4) months must be spayed/neutcred prior to ~L~-,ing to an adopting patty. In any event the animal must be altered within 30 days of receipt by the rescuer. O. Accurate and conlplete records of all =.imnlm shall be maintained by the animal rescuer on forms which will be wade available to Chief Animal Control Of Bcer for inspection upon request. reh2d to the ~t of i.-_~ or injury. L Admini-~-ation of the animal rescue program shnl! be the responsibility of the Chief Animal Control Officer who shall have the authority to issue and revok~ animal rescue Section 6.02.070. I')uties sund Powers of Officers. A. It shall be the duty of all peace officen to cooperate with and assist the Chief Animal Control Officer in the enforcement of the provisions of this Chapter, and such peace officers and the Chief Animal Control Officer shall be empowered to: 1. Receive, take up and impound: a. Any dog found rdnning at large in violation of this chapter or of any hw of the State of California; Any dog which, without provocation or direction, is molesting: any person; and c. Any dog which, without provocation or direction, is molesting or harassing animals, birds, or pets upon the premises of any person. 2. Regularly and adequately feed, water and otherwise care for all dogs and cats impounded under the provisions of this ordinance, or to provide for such feeding, watering and care. 3. Investigate the condition and behavior of any dog or cat which he has reason to believe is vicious or dangerous and if he finds such dog or cat to be vicious or dangerous in its habits, he shall report his findings in writing, either by hand-delivery or by mail, to the owner of such dog or cat if the name and whereabouts of said owners are known, and if unknown, then the dog or cat shall be impounded. 4. Follow the provisions of Ctmpt~r 6.04 in humanely destroying or giving emergency care to sick or injured dogs and cats. Unless otherwise prohibited by hw, all persons whose duty it is to enforce the provisions of this Chapter are hereby empowered to enter upon private property, where any dog or cat is kept or reasonably believed to be kept, for the purpose of ascerminhg whether 0t~95-0~ 9 such dog or cat is lc~ in violation of any provision of ~ chapter. Notwithstanding any provision in this Clapta relating m entry upon private propc=~y for any ~,uq. as~ under this ~, no suc, h entry may be conducted: (a) without the npzss or implied consent of the pminty owner or the penon laving lawful possession thez~of, or Co) unless an inspection wanant has been issued and the entry is conducted in accordance with California Code of Ovil Procedure, Sections 1822..50 through 1822.56, inclusive, or (c) except as may otherwise be expressly or implied permitted by law. Section 6.02.090. r~ogs Running At T sWe. In the interest of public safety, it shall be hwful for any person to take up, in a humane manner, any dog nmning at large in violation of this Chapter and promptly to deliver such dog to the Chief Animal Control Officer. .- Section 6.02.100~ Impounded r)o[,s and Cats. A. An impounded dog or cat may be redeemed upon payment as set pursuant to City Council Resolution adopted following a public hearing noticed as required punuant to State Law. B. The fee for destruction and disposal of any dog or cat in accordance with any .. provision of this Chapter, shall be as set pursuant to City Council Resolution adopted following a public hearing noticed as required pursuant to State Law. C. Any dog, four (4) months of age or older, which has been impounded shall not be released from impoundment unless it is licensed in accordance with the provisions of this Chapter. D. Any officer acting under the provisions of this Chapter and impounding a licensed dog pursuant to Section 6.02.070 A, 1, 2 or 3 or a licensed cat, shall give written notice by tint class mail, postage prepaid, to the last known address of the owner, of the impounding of such dog or cat. If such dog or cat is not redeemed within ten (10) days from the date of the mailing of such notice, the officer having custody of the dog or cat sb~ll dispose of it in accordance with the provisions of Section 6.02.100 G, or shall destroy such dog or cat. E. Upon impounding an unlicensed dog pursuant to Section 6.02.070 A. or an unlicensed cat, the officer shall give notice to the owner, ff the owner and his whereabouts are known, of the impounding of such dog or cat. ff such dog or cat has not been redeemed within five (5) days of the giving of such notice, the officer shall dispose of such dog or cat in accordance with the provisions of Section 6.02,100 G, or shall destroy such dog or cat. For the purpose of this notice specified herein shall be given in the manner determined by o~s 95o6 1o F. The off~:er hayinS custody of any impounded dog or cat may, by humane methods, summarily destroy such dog or cat if:. 1. The dog or cat is suffering from any incurable, dangerous or contagious disease, providing a veterinarian shall certify, in writing, that such dog or cat is so suffering; or, G. Any ofiizr having his cusiody any ~edeemed, impounded dog or cat my release such dog or cat to any adult individual upon payment by the individual of the impound fees and charges specified in Seelien 6.02,100 A, and the spay/nenter deposit fee ~ in Section 6.02.110 A or to a nonprofit corponttion formed under the provisions of the California Corporations Code commencing with Section 10400 for the prevention of cruelty to Snimlds or to a nonprofit org~nir-~tlon formed under the hws of the State of California for the prevention of czuelty to animals, for such sale or placement as such nonprofit corporation or nonprofit orL, sni,stion may choose. lzele~.ws of dogs and cats to such nonprofit corporations or nonprofit organizations pursuant to Section 6.02.110 G shall not be subject to the payment of the impound fees and charges specified in Section 6.02.100 A, but shall be subject to the spay/neut~r deposit specified in Section 6.02.110 A. H. It shall be unlawful for any person to remove an impounded animal from an animal control center without permission of the officer in charge thereof. Section 6.02.110. ~pay/Neuter Deposits for Dolls and Cats. No person shall be permitted to adopt or purchase any dog or cat which has not been spayed or neutered, from any public pound, any animal shelter, society or organization, unless and until a deposit has been paid in the mount set by City Council Resolution. Section 6.02.120. Vicious r~oi, s and f~ts. and Stray and P-~rklnll rlolls. A. It shall be unlawful for the owner or person in charge of any vicious dog or vicious cat to fail, neglect, or refuse to ~ posted in a conspicuous place at or near the entrance to the premises on or within which such dog or cat is kept, a sign having lettn~ at least two (2) inches in width and two (2) inches in height and reading "Beware of Vicious Dog" or "Beware of Vicious Cat", as may be ayl~mpdate. No vicious dog or vicious cat shall be permitted to leave the premises of the owner or person in charge thereof unless such dog or cat is under the immediate control and physical restraint of such owner or person and in the case of a vicious dog, such dog shall be m-~led. B. If is shall be determined by the Chief Animal Control Officer that a dog or cat is a vicious dog or cat but is not acted with rabies, the Chief Animal Control Officer shall thereupon order the person who owns or has custody of such dog or cat that until further Ords 95-06 ll to comply with any order of the Chief Animal Control Officer mad~ pursuant to thi~ subsection, on the part of the owner or person having custody of the dog or cat which is the subject of such order, shall constime a violation of this Clmptcr. C. It shall be unlawful for the owner or person in charge of any dog, whether licensed or unlicensed, to permit such dog to run at large. D. It shall be unlawful for any person to keep or allow to be kept, or suffer or permit any dog to remain upon the premises under the control of such person, when such dog habitually bath, whines or males loud or unusual noises in such a manner as to disturb .. the pesc~ and quiet of the neighbors surrounding or in the vicinity of such premises, or whose barking or howling or other sound or cry interferes with any person of ordinary sensitivity in the reasonable comfortable enjoyment of life and prolx~ ty. E. It shall be unlawful for any person to set or maintain an openling trap for a cat unless a sign is posted on the lax, l/=tty stating that such trap is in use on the property. The sign shall be clearly vi_~ble from the road serving the property on which the trap is set -. or maintained and shall remain posted and vi~htc at all times while the trap is in use. Trapping shall not continue for more than ten (10) days in a thirty (30) day period. This section shah not apply when the trap is being used for rabies control as determined in writing by the Chief Animal Control Officer. Section 6.02.130. l~ahies ~qppression. Control and Qpanntine. A. ff it shall appear to the Chief Animal Control Officer that any animal has rabies, the Chief Animal Control Officer may destroy such animal forthwith, or may hold such animal for further examination or observation for such time as the Chief Animal Control Officer my determine to be approF, Late. B. Whencver any animal has bccn bitten by an animal which has rabies, which exhibits any symptoms of rabies or which is otherwise suspected of having or having been exposed to rabics, thc owner or lx~on having custody of such bitten animal shall immediately notify the Chief Animal Control Officer, and shall immediately confine the animal and maintain that ¢on~necnent until it is eatab~ to tl~ ~tisfae-tlon of tig Chief Officer shall have the power to qtlarantinc any such animal, or ilnpound it at the owncr*s in the opinion of the Chief Animal Control Officer, to adequately confine such animal immediately, or in the event the owner or person having custody of such animal is not readily accessible. Officer quarantine such animal and ka~ it confined at the owner's expense for a minimum period of ten (10) days for dogs and cats and fourteen (14) days for all other anirnsd-% and sban allow the Chief Animal Control Offi~ to mains an inspection or examination of such animal at any time during such period of quarantine. ~nimal,q quarantined pursuant to ~ subsection shall not be removed from the premises upon which such animal is quarantined without permission of the Chief Animal Control Offxcer. The Chief Animal Control Officer is hereby authorized to impound any animal at the owner's expense in the event the owner or person having custody of such animal fails or refuses to so confine such animal. Animals quarantined pursuant to this subsection shall remain under quarantine until notice is given by the Chief Animal Control Officer that such quarantine is terminated. D. The Chief Animal Control Officer may, in his discretion, post or cause to be posted an appropriate sign on any premises where an animal is quarantined pursuant to this Chapter, for the purpose of warning the public of the fact of such quarantine. It ShRll be unlawful for any person to remove a sign on any premises where an animal is quarantined pursuant to this Chapter, for the purpose of warning the public of the fact of such quarantine. It shall be unlawful for any person to remove a sign posted pursuant to this subsection without the permission of the Chief Animal Contwl Officer. E. Whenever the Chief Animal Control ~ shall determine that an epidemic of rabies exists or is threatened, the Chief Animal Control Offtea' shall have the authority to take such measures as my be reasonably necessary to prevent the spread of the disease, including but not limited to the d~laration of quarantine against any or all aniw~l-~ in any area of the City of Temecula as the Chief Animal Conlxol Officer may determine and define, for a period of not more than one hundred and twenty (120) days. An additional or extended quarantine period may also be declared ff such additional or extended quarantine period shall be deemed necessary by the Chief Animal Control Officer for the protection and presezvation of the public health, peace and safety. Any quarantine decbred pursuant to this subsection, other than as restricted herein, shall be upon such conditions as the Chief Animal Control Officer may determine and declare. F. No person shall bring a dog into the City of Temecula from any city located in the County of Riverside in which a reported case of rabies exist or has existed within the past six (6) months, nor shall any person bring a dog into the City of Temecula from any county, city, state or country in which a reported case of rabies exists or has existed within the preceding six months. G. In order to protect the public health from the hazard of mbie~ which has been found to exist in shutks, a quarantine is hereby imposed to continue until teleased by the Chid Animal Control Officer, whereby it is prohibited to trap or capture skunks for pets; to trap, capture, or hold skunks in captivity for any reason; to Wansport skunks from or into the City of Temecula except pursuant to a permit issued by the California DeparUnent of Health Ords 95-06 13 Se~:~s puxsu~t to Title ]7, Califoxnia Admini-erafiv~ C. od~, Sex:fion 2606.8, R~-tion 6.09.140. Plm'~nent Reqllirement. A. Any person or bu~ness eNity or other org~nir~tlon located in or doing business in the City of Temecuia, which, 1. advertises or often in any manner, puppies or dogs for:. a. sale, or b. trade, or c.. batter, or d. to be given away for free 2. Must di~lay in such adverti-~ernents the following information: the license number and name of the lice~,~ing agency of each of the mother shimsis any of whose offspring are so offered Cm the case of puppies under four months of age), and/or the lmnnel and or rescue permit number and name of the permitting agency of the owner of each of the mother .him.is any of whose offspring are so offered (in the case of puppies under four months of age), and/or the lnmel permit and/or rescue number and name of the permitting agency of the owner of each of the dogs so offered (in the case of animals four months or more of age). B. This Section shall not apply to public nnimsls shelters or non-profit humane societies which are in compliance with Food and Agricultural Code Sections 30503 and 3175 1, nor shah it apply to persons who relinquish animals to such shelters or soleties. C. A viohtion of this Section shall be puni.~hsble as follows: 1. For a first time violation, the owner shall be subject to a $50.00 fine. a. This fine may be waived and the citation 61smist~'d if within 30 days after receiving the citation the party has had the mother animal spayed and has provided proof of the spaying the County Animal Control 2. For a second violation, the owner shall be subject to a $100.00 fine. a. $50.00 of the fine my be waived if within 30 days after Orsis 95416 14 after recei~ the citation the party has provided proof of spaying to County Animal Control. For any subsequent vioh~on, the owner shall be subject to a $200.00 a. $50.00 of the fine may be waived if within 30 days after receiving the citation the party has had the mother animal spayed and has provided proof of the spaying to County Animal Control. 4. Viohtors are subject to citation and are to be furnished with a list of low-cost or no-cost spay and neuter resources. 5. It shall be unlawful for any person to malz use of a stolen, counterfeit or unauthorized license, lag, certificate or any other document or thing for the purpose of evading the provisions of thi~ section. 6. Fifty percent of all fees collected pursuant to this Section may be used for the general cost of Chief Animal Control Officer. The remaining fifty percent of nil such fees shall be placed in a separate fund to be used exclusively for low-cost spay and neuter services and education related to the benefits of spaying and neutering. Section 6.(P., 140. Prohibition of .~nles or the C, iving Away of Do~s nnd Cn~ on Public ~. No person in the City shall offer for sale or sell or give away or transfer for adoption any cat, kitten, dog or puppy on any public street, public sidewalk or public park. Section 6.02.150. F. nforcement. A. The Chief Animal Control Officer shah supervise the ndministration and enforcement of this Chapter and of the laws of the State of California pertaining to the control of dogs and shall have charge of animal control center employees and facilities. B. The City Council may enter into a written agreement or agreements with any veterinarian or any organized humane society or association, which will undertalz to carry out the provisions of ~is Chapter and mainlain and operate a pound, and which will licenm, talz up, impound and dispose of ~nim~ls. Any such vettl'inarian or society or association which shall enter into such an agreement shatl carry-out all of the provisions of this Cbn,nter in the manner herein prescribed. C. It shall be unlawful for any person to interfere with, oppose or resist any officer or tin'son mnpowemi to enfor~ the provisimm of this Chap~ while such officer or person is engaged in the pafo,~ance of his duties as provided hewn: D. Nothing in this ordinnnce shall prevent the Chief Animal Control Officer from acting, when he deems it approl~iate to do so, under the applicable pwvisions of C. allfomia Penal Code, Seaion 597, et. till. Section 6.02.160. Violation. Any penon viohting any of the provisions d this Chapter shnll be guilty of an infraction and upon conviction thereof shall be punished by (1) a fine not exceeding fifty dollars 650.00) for the first viohfion; (2) a fine not exceeding one hundred dollars ($100.00) for the second violation within one (1) year;, (3) a fine not exceeding two hundred and fifty dollars ($250.00) for each additional viohfion within (1) year. Each day a viohfion is committed or permitted to continue shall constitute a separate offense. Section 6.02.180. RecoUpment of F. nforcement Costs. The intent of this Section is to authorize the recoupment of administrative costs reasonably related to the enforcement of this Chapter. In furtherance of this intent the City: shall be enfified to recover costs of enforcement, including costs of staff lime, by complying' with the following procedure: A. Records of Costs. The Chief Animal Control Officer or his designee shall maintain records of all ncJministrative costs itwutred in the processing of the violation or viohtions and the enforcement of this Chapter and other applicable Chapters and may recover such costs from the viohtor and/or propcity owner or propc, ty occupier as provided herein. B. Notice. Upon investigation and determination that a violation of any of the pwvisions of this Chapter or other related City Ordinances is found to exist, the Chief Animal Control Officer or his designee shall notify the viohtor and/or record owner of the property or any person having possession or control of the subject pwperty, by mail of the existence of the vioh~on, of his intent to charge the violator and/or pwlP-,ny owner and/or person having possession or control of the propctty for all administrative costs assochted with enforcement, and of the respondent's fight to a hearing on objections thereto. The notice shah be in substantially the following form: NOTICB The Chief Animal Contwl Officer of the City of Temecula has/have determined that conditions exist at the propa~y located at which violate Section (s) Mtmicil~! Code Section towit: of the Temecuh Notice is hereby given that at the conclusion of this case you will receive a summary of admini,~z-ative eosts associated with the processing of such viohfions(s). You will have the right to object to these charges by filing a Request for Hearing with the Chief Animal Control Officer within ten (10) days of service of the Summary of Charges. C. Summsllr of Charges. At the conclusion of the case, Chid Animal Control Officer shall send a Summary of Charges associated with enforcement to the viohtor and/or owner of the ~ and/or person having possession or control of the subject Ftopcaty by certified mail. The Summary shall include a notice in substantially the following form: / NOTICE If you object to these charges, you must file a Request for Hearing on the enclosed Form within ten (10) days of the date of this notice. IF YOU FAIL TO TIMelY REQUF, ST A HEARING, YOUR RIGHT TO OBIECT WH ,L BB WAIVED AND YOU WILL BE LIABLE TO THE CITY OF TEMECUIA FOR THESE CHARGES, TO BE RECOVERED IN A CIVIL ACTION IN THE NAME OF THE CITY IN ANY COURT OF COMPETENT IURISDICTION WITHIN THE COUNTY. Dated: Chief Animal Control Officer City of Ternecula Ords 95-06 17 D. l~il, ht to H~rinl. Any violator or pfoputy owner, or other person having possession and control of the propca ty,-who receives a Summary of Charges under this section shall have the right to a he~ring before the Chief Animal Control Offwet or his designee on his objection to the proposed costs in accordance with the procedures set forth herein. E. ReqUest for H~rinl,. A request for hearing shall be filed with the Chief Animal Control Offget within ten (10) days of the service by mail of the Summary of Charges. Within thirty (30) days of the filing of the request, and on ten (10) days notice to the viohtor or owner, Chief Animal Control Offxcer or his desi~nee shall hold a hearing on the viohtor's and/or owner's objections and shall determine the validity thereof. F. Recovet3r of Cost-~. In the event that (a) no Request for Hearing is timely filed '- or Co) after a hearing in which the Chid Animal Control Officer or his designee aftinns the validity of the charges, the viohtor, the prol~ty owner or person in control and possession of the propet ty Shill be liable to the City in the mount stated in the Summary of Charges or any lesser mount as determined by the Chief Animal Control Officer or his designce. These Charges shall be recoverable in a civil action in the name of the City, in any court of competent jurisdiction within the County. G. Of~cer's Decision. In determining the validity of the Charges, the Chief Animal Control Officer or his designee shall consider whether the total charges have been fairly and accurately calculated. Factors to be considered include whether the time and personnel spent in enforcement were reasonably ~necessary to bring about compliance. H. ADDgtl. The decisions of the Chief Animal Control Officer or his designee may be appealed by filing a written Notice of Appeal with the Chief Animal Control Officer within five (5) days after the decision. The appeal shall be heard by the City Council which may affirm, amend or reverse the decision and may take any other action deemed appropriate. The Chid Animal Control Of~cer sbs~ ~ive written notice of the time and place of the hearing. Section 6.02.190. Public Nui.~nce. A. The possession or maintenance of any dog or cat or the allowing of any dog or cat to be in violation of this Chapter, in addition to being a violation of this Chapter, is hereby declared to be a public nuisance. The Chief Animal Control Officer and any City pes:~ officer are hereby directed and empowered to sxsmm~rily abate any such public nuisance independen~y or any criminal prosecution or the results thereof, by any means reasonably n~ry to accomplish said abatement including but not limited to the destruction of the dog or cat involved, or by the imposition of specific reasonable conditions and restrictions for the maintenance of such dog or cat. Failure to comply with such conditions and restrictions is a misdemeanor. The owner of such dog or cat shall reimburse Otdl 95-O6 the City of Temecula for all costs incurred in enforcing compliance with the provisions of _this Seaion. The City of Temecula, by and through the Chief Animal Control Officer, may also commence and maintain such proce~ings in a court of competent jurisdiction as are apyropihte under the hws and regulations of the State of California for the abatement and redress of public nuisances. B. At least ten (10) working days prior to the impmmdment or abatement or both pursuant to Section 6.02.190 A, the owner or custodian of the subjea dog or cat shah be notified by the Chief Animal Control Officer, in wriling, of the right to a he~ing to determine whether grounds exist for such impoundme~t or abatement or, where applicable, both. Said notice shall be served by hand-delivery or by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, remm receipt requested. If the owner or custodian requests a hearing prior to impoundment or abatement, no impoundment or abatement shall take place until the conclusion of such hearing, except as provided in Section 6.02.190 C. C. When, in the opinion of the Chief Animal Control Officer, immediate impoundment is necesssry for the lreservafion of animal or public health, safet~ or welfare, or if the subject dog or cat has been impounded under any other provision of this Chapter or any hw or reguhtion of the State of California, the pre-impoundment hearing shall be deemed waived; provided, however, that the owner or custodian of the subject dog or cat shah be given notice by the Chief Animal Control Officer, in writing, which would allow : five (5) working days to request an abatement hearing. Service of such notice shall be in accordance with the service methods specified in Section 6.02.190 B. Where requested by such owner or custodian, a heating sbnll be held within five (5) days of the request therefor, and the subject dog or cat shall not be disposed of prior to the conclusion of the hearing. If, after five (5) working days from the date of service of the notice specified in this Section 6.02,190 C, no request for a heating is received from the owner or custodian of the subject dog or cat, such dog or cat shall be disposed of pursuant to applicable provisions of hw. D. All hearings pursuant to this Section shall be conducted by the Chief Animal Control Officer personally or by a desiL'nsted employee who shall not have been directly involved in the subject action. Hearings shall be held not more than ten (10) days from the date of receipt of the request for the hearing and shall be conducted in an informal manner consistent with due process of law. A heating may be continued for a reasonable period of time if the Chief Animal Control Officer deems such continuance to be necessary and propa or if the owner or custodian shows good cause for such continuance. Within (10) days after the conclusion of the hearing, the Chief Animal Contwl Officer shall render, in writing, his findings, decisions and order thereon and shall give notice of said findings, decision and order to the owner or custodian of the subjea dog or cat; service of such notice shall be in accordance with the service methods specifiai in Section 6.02.190 B. Section 3. Chapter 6.06 of the Temecula Code is revised in its entirety to read is follows: 0tds 95-06 19 "t~pter 6.06 Fnilure to t~re for nnim:als 6.06.020. T~ty to f'~re for Animnls. and attention is guilty of a mi~e~.~mor. The Chief Animal Control Officer shall tnk~ possession of the stray or abandoned animal and shall provide care and tnmtmeat for the When the officer has reasonable grounds to believe that very prompt action is required in protect the health or safety of the animal and othen, the ~ shall immedintely seize the animal and comply with Section 6.08.070. In all other cases, the Officer shall comply with the provisions of Section 6.08.080. The cost of caring for and treating any animal properly seized under this subdivision shall constituZ it Hen on the animal and the animal shall not be returned to its owner until the charges are paid, ff the seizure is upheld pursuant m this 6.06.030 Treatment of Str~ nnd Injured Animals. Every sick, disabled, injured, or crippled nnim~ul, except a dog or cat, which is abandoned in the City, may be killed by the Chief Animal Control Officer if, after reasonable search, no owner of the animal can be found. It shall be the duty of the Chief Animal Control Officer to cause the animal to be killed or rehabilitatc~d and placed in a suitable home on information that the animal is stray or abandoned. The Offxeer may lil~wise talz charge of any animal, including a dog or cat, that by reason of lnmeness, sickness, feebleness, or neglect, is unfit for the labor it is performing, or that in any other manner is being cruelly treated, and provide care and treatment for the animal until it is deemed to be in a suitable condition to be tW. trned to the owner. When the Officer has reasonable grounds to believe that very prompt action is required to protect the health or safety of an animal or the health or safety of othen, the officer shah immediately seizethe animal and comply with Section 6.08.070. In all other cases, the Officer shah comply with Section 6.08.080. The cost of caring for and treating any animal properly seized under this Section shall constitute a lien on the animal and the animal shall not be returned to its owner until the charges are paid. 6.06.040 C~re ofltljured Animsls. A. The Chief Animal Control Officer shall convey nil injured cats and dogs found without their owners in a public place directly to a vetn'inarian known by the officer to be a veterinnrian who ordinarily treats dogs and cats for a determination of whether the animal shah be immedistely and humanely destroyed or shall be hospitalized under proper care and given emergency treatmenL Oeds 95-436 2O to mkc possession of the animal. C. Whenever any animalis tmnsfen~ to a vetetinazian in a clinic, such ~ds an emergency clinic, which is not in continuous operation, the veterinarian may, in ram, D. If the veterinnrian determines that the animal shall be hospimlized under the proper care and given emergency treatment, the corn of any services which are provided pending the owner's inquiry to the Chief Animal Control Officer or local humane society shall be paid from the dog license fees, fines, and fees for impounding dogs in the City, subject to the provision that this cost be repaid by the animal's owner. The cost of caring for and treating any animal seized under this Section shall constitute a lien on the animal and the animal shah not be returned to the owner until the charges are paid. No veterinarian shall be criminatly or civilly liable for any decision which he or she makes or for services which he or she provides pursuant to this Section. 6.06.050. Records of Handling of Sm~v and Injured Animals. When Chief Animal Control Officer takes possession of an animal pursuant to Section 6.08.040, he shall keep records of the whereabouts of the animal for 72-hour period from the time of possession, and those records shall be available for inspection by the public upon request in the field in any case where the animal is too severely injured to move or where a veterinarian is not available and it would be more humane to dispose of the animal. 6.06.060. HumAne Destruction of Severely Ir0ured AnimAls. NotwithsUmding any other provisions of this Chapter the Chief Animal Control Officer my humanely destroy any stray or abandoned animal in the field in any case where the animal is too severely injured to move or where a veterinarian is not available and it would be move humane to dispose of the animal. 6.06.070. Post-seizure Hi. ratings. A. Whenever the Chief Animal Control Officer seizes or impounds an animal based on a reasonable belief that prompt action is required to protect the health and safety of the animal or the health or safety of othen, the Offxcer sixall, prior to the commencement of any criminal proceedings authorized by this Chapter, provide the owner or keeper of the animal, if known or ascertainable after reasonable investigation, with the opporUmity for a postseizure hearing to determine the validity of the seizure or impoundment orbotho Onis 9506 11 B. TheChiefAnimalControl~shallcauseanoticetobeaffixedto a conspieuons place where the animal was sltt,=ted or personany deliver a notice of the seizure or impoendment, or both, to the owner or keeper within 48 houn, excluding weekends and holidays. The notice shall include all of the following: 1. The name, b,:~ness address and telephone number of the Chief Animal Control Officer. A description of the animal seized, including any identification upon the animal. The authority and purpose for the seizure, or impoundment, including the time, place and circumstances under which the A s~tement that, in order to receive a postseintte hearing, the owner or person authorized to keep the animal, or his or her agent, shah request the hearing by signing and returning an enclosed declaration of ownership or fight to keep the animal to the Chief Animal Control Officer within 10 days, including wee-h~ds and holidays, of the date of the notice. The ~ declaration may be returned by personal delivery or mail. A statement that the cost of eating for and treating any animal properly seized under this Chapter is a lien on the animal and that the animal shall not be returned to the owner until the charges are paid, and that failure to request or to attend a scheduled hearing shall result in liability for this cost. C. The postseizure hearing shall be conducted within 48 hours of the request excluding week~ds and holidays. The City Manager shall ~ondua the hearing. D. Failure of the owner or keeper, or of his or her agent, to request or to attend a scheduled hearing shall result in a forfeiture of any fight to a postaeizure hearing or fight to challenge his or her liability for cost incurred. E. The City shall be responsible for the costs incurred for caring and treating the nnimnl, if it iS determined in the postseiztlre heating that the Chief Animal Control Officer did not have reasonable grounds m believe very prompt ac'tion, including or safety of others. If it is determined the seizure and care of the :;nlm=!, the charges for the seizure was justified, the owner or izeper shall be personally liable to the City and care of the animal shall be a lien on the animal, and the animal shall not be returned to its owner until the charges are paid and the City Manager has determined that the animal is physically A. Where the need for immPdi~te seizure is not present and prior to the commencement of any criminal proceedings authorized by this Chapter, the Chief Animal Control ~ shall provide the owner or lappet of the animal, if known or ~le after reasonable investigation, with the opportunity for a hearing prior to any seizure or im~undment of the animal. The owner shall produce the animal at the time of the heating unless, prior to the hearing, the owner has made axrangements with the Chief Aninml Control Officer to view the animal upon request of the Chief Animal Control Officer, or unless the owner can provide verification that the animal washumandy destroyed. Any person who willfully fails to produce the animal or provide the verification is guilty of an infraction, punishable by a fine of not less that two hundred fifty dollars ($250) nor more than one thousand dollan ($1,000). B. The Chief Animal Control Officer shall cause a notice to be affixed to a conspicuous place where the animal was situated or personally deliver a notice stating the grounds for believing the animal should be seized under Sections 6.08.020 or 6.08,030. The notice shall include all of the following: The name, business address, and telephone number of the Chief Animal Control Officer. A description of the animal to be seized, including any identification upon the animal. The authority and purpose for the possible seizure or impoundment. A statement that, in order to receive a hearing prior to any seizure, the owner or person authorize! to keep the animal, or his or her agent, shall request the hearing by signing and retunting the enclosed declaration of ownership or fight to izep the animal to the of~cer pwviding the notice within two days, excluding weekends and holidays, of the date of the notice. A statement that the cost of caring for and treating any animal properly seized under this section is a lien on the Sunimsd, that any animal seized shall not be returned to the owner until the charges ate paid, and that failure to request or to attend a scheduled hearing shall re. suit in a conclusive determination that onls 95-06 C. The ~eseizure heating shall be conducted within 48 hours, excluding w~.lc~cls and holidays, a~er receipt of the request. The City Manager shall conduct the hearing. D. Failure of the owner or izeper, or his or her agent, to request or to attend a scheduled he~ring shall result in a forfeiture of any fight to a preseizu~ hearing or right to challenge his or her lln_hility for COSt incurred pursuant to this section. E. The City Manager, after the heating, my affirm or deny the owner's or keeper's fight to custody of the animal and, if reasonable grounds are established, may order the seizure or impoundment of the animal for care and treatment. 6.06.090. Cost of ImZ~oundment: Bestruction of Impounded Animals. animal. Furthermore, if the charges for the seizure or impoundment and any other charges permitted under this Chapter are not paid within 14 days of the seizure, or, if the owner, within 14 days of notice of availability of the animal to be returned, fails to pay charges permitted under this Chapter and tak~ possession of the animal, the animal shall be deemed to have been abandoned and may be disposed of by the Chief Animal Control Officer. B. A veterinarian may humanely destroy an impounded animal without regard to the prescribed holding period when it has been determined that the animal has incurred severe injuries or is incurably crippled. A veterinarian also may immediately humanely destroy an impoundment animal afflicted with a serious contagious disease unless the owner or his or her agent immediately authorizes treatment of the animal by a veterinarian at the expense of the owner or agent 6.06.170. r}iSl~ositien of Sei~ured Anim~,ls. Upon the conviction of a person charged with a violation of this Chapter, all ~nim~ls lawfully seized and impounded with respect to the violation shall be adjudged by the for proper disposition. A person convicted of a violation of this Chapter shall be personally liable to the City for all costs of impoundment from the time of seizure to the time of proper disposition. This Chapter shall not prohibit the seizure or impoundment of animals as evidence as provided for under any other provision of law.' Sec~on 4. follows: Chapter 6.08 is added to the Temecula Municipal Code to read as Prohibition of ehc Runnin~ st 1 ~We of r~omes~c Fowls or r~omestic Animals other than r:ogs or Cats and providing for Their Inlpounding. Section 6.08.010. r~nitions. Whenever in this Chapter the words herein defined are used they shall have the respective meanings assigned to them in the following definitions: A. "Animal* means any domestic bovine animal, horse, mule, burro, sheep, goat, swine or other domestic animal except a dog or cat. B. "Fowl* means any chicken, duck, turkey goose or other domestic fowl. C. "Chief Animal Control Officer" means the Chief Animal Control Officer of the City of Temecula or his designated representative. D. "At large' means off the premises of, and not under physical restraint, by, the owner or other person having charge of an animal. Section 6.08.020. Animals or Fowls ~t I ~e Prohibited. No person owning or having charge of any animal or fowl shall permit th~ same to be at large on any highway, street, sidewalk, lane, alley or other public place, or upon any private property other than that of the person owning or having charge of such animal or fowl _unless such owner or person having charge of such animal or fowl has the consent of the owner of the private property. Section 6.08.030. F-xemption. This Chapter shall not pwhibit leading, driving, riding or conducting animals under adequate supervision along a public highway. Section 6.08.040. Impounding Animals. Subject to the provisions contained in Section 6.08.150, it shall be the duty of the Chief Animal Control Officer to tak= up and impound all animals found at large upon any highway, street, sidew~lic, lane, alley or other public place, or upon any private property. The Chief Animal Control Officer may contract with any person to keep, feed and care for any such animal at reasonable rates for not more than 20days. Section 6.08.050. r}i~position of Animals. l~ahid or rgsahled. ff it 8h:~11 appear to the Chief Animal Control Officer from the report of a Licensed veterinarian or other qualified person that an animal i~ affli~d with rabies, be shall humanely destroy such animal, and shall tak~ such other action as may be required by law ouls 95-06 21 and as he deems neces,~ry to prevent the spread of such disease. He may humanely destroy any sick, disabled, infirm or crippled animal found at large if he is unable to identify and locate the owner. ,~ecti on 6.08.060.nitposition of P6vine Animnl s. Horses, Mules or P, urfows. If the Chief Animal Control Officer impounds any bovine nnimSlS, horse, mule, or burro, and if such animal is not reclaimed within 5 days thereafcer, the Chief Animal Control Officer shall notify the State Director of Agriculture in accordance with the provisions of Agricultural Code Section 17003. If the Director of Agricul~ does not, within 5 days after notice, elect to dispose of any horse, mule, or burro, then the Chief Animal Contwl Officer shall sell such animal in accordance with this Chapter. Section 6.08.070. r~i~position of Other Animnls. If any animal other than a domestic bovine animal, horse, mule, or burro, and except an animal afflicted with rabies, impounded by the Chief Animal Control Officer, is not reclaimed within 2 days thereafter, it shall he sold by the Chief Animal Control Officer after giving notice of sale in accordance with 6.08,080. Section 6.08.080. Notice of Sale. The notice of sale sbnll contain a description of the animal, including any identifying marks or brands; the date and place where the animal was taken up; and the time and place of sale. At least 5 days prior to the sale of any impounded animal, the Chief Animal Control Officer shall cause a copy of the notice to he published in a newspaper circulated in the area where the animal was found, and shall mail a copy of the notice to the owner or person entitled to possession of the animal at his residence or place of business, if known. Section 6.08.090. Snle of Animals. At the time and place set forth in the notice of sale, the Chief Animal Control Officer shall sell the impounded animal at public' sale, to the highest bidder, for cash. If no bid is offered for such animal, the Chief Animal Control Officer may sell such animal at private sale or humanely destwy such animal, or otherwise dispose of it as permitted by law. Section 6.08.100. Proceeds of Snle. The proceeds of such sale, after first deducting fees and charges of the Chief Animal Control Officer, including costs of sale, shall he paid by the Chief Animal Control Officer, to the City, which shall then pay over to the owner of such animal sold if chimed within one year thereafter. If not so chimed, the monies shall be transferred into the general fund of the City. Section 6.08.110. Redemption of Animnls by the Owner. The owner or pe~on en~~ed to poues~ion of any animal impounded, may at any time before the sale or other disposition thereof, redeem the same by paying the Chief Animal Control Officer all fees and charges thereon. Section 6.08.170. Cnst of Redemption. The Chief Animal Control Officer shall charge and collea from each person redeeming any impounded animal an impounc!_i_ng fee of $20.00, pins the actual costs of wanspoxthg the animal to impound, the actual costs of veterinary and rehted services rendered to the animal while impounded, the actual cost of -sale incurred, and the actual costs of any extraordinary measures required in or for the handling and maintenance of the animal while impounded, and in addition thereto, the maintenance fees as adopted by City Council resolution following a public hearing noticed as required under State Law. Section 6.08.130. Authorization to ~.nter upon Private Pr~l~'n~. Notwithstanding any provisions contained in _this Chapter rehting to the entry upon private paopaty for any pro'poses hereunder, no such entry may be conducted (a without the consent of the l~rop~ty owner or the ~ having hwful possession thereof, or with Code of Civil Procedures Section 1822.50 through 1822.56, inclusive, or c) except as may otherwise be prescribed by hw. Section 6.08.140. Inhumane Treatment and Abandonment] Impoundment. A. No person shall treat an animal in a cruel or inhumane manner or willingly or negligently cause or permit any animal to suffer unnecessary torture or pain. No person shall abandon any animal without care on any public or private property. B. Subject to the provisions contained in Section 6.06.150 herein, any animal which is abandoned, or treated in a cruel or inhumane manner, or willingly or negligently allowed to suffer necessary torture or pain in violation of Section 6.06.140 A herein, may be impounded or disposed of in a humane manner. The City Council may adopt by Resolution policies and standards for the disposition of animals ~:jzed, impounded and forfeited pursuant to this Chapter. Section 6.08.150. Impoundmerit Hearing. At least three (3) working days prior to the impoundment of any animal, notice shall be given in person to, or by mail to the last known address of, the owner or person entitled to possession thereof of his or her right to a hearing as to whether or not such impoundment is justified. ff the owner or person entitled to possession thereof requests a hearing prior to impoundment, no impoundment shall take place until the conclusion of the hearing except as provided herein. ff in the opinion of the Chief Animal Control Officer, immediate impoundment is necessary for the preservation of the public health or safety, the pre-impoundment hearing may be dispensed with; provided, however, in such cases the 95-O6 27 owner or person entitled to pos,_~ion thereof shall be given three O) working days notice as provided herein of his or her fight to a he-rinl. If a hearing is requested, the he~rinl shah be held within five (~ days of the request, and the animal shall not be sold, destroyed or otherwise disposed. of prior to the conclusion of the he~rin~. Notice of the time, date and place of the hearing shall be given to the owner or person entitled to posse~ thereof. If at the end of the hearing, the impoundmerit is found to be unjustified, the animal shall be returned to the owner or person entitled to possession thereof without charge. Section 6.08.160. Pennlties. A. Any individual violating any pwvision of this Chapter shall be deemed guilty of an infraction or misdemeanor as hereinafter specified. Such hdividual shall be deemed guilty of a separate offense for each and every day or portion thereof during which any viohtion of any of the provisions of this Chapter is committed, continued, or permitted. B. Any individual convicted of a violation of this Chapter shall be (1) guilty of an infraction offense and punished by a free not exceeding one hundred dollars ($100.00) for a first violation; (2) guilty of an infraction offense and punishe~ by a fine not exceeding two hundred dollars ($200.00) for a second violation perpeWated by the same individual. The third and any additional violations perpetrated by the same individual shall constitute a misdemeanor offense and shall be punishable by a fine not exceeding one thousand dollars ($1,000.00) or six (6') months in jail, or both. Notwith,~nding the above, first offense may be charged and prosecuted as a misdemeanor. Payment of any penalty herein shall not relieve an individual from the responsibility for correcting the violation. Onisg~4}6 2S PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTEB this 28th day of March, 1995 Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor ATTEST: June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CAt-wORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) CITY OF ~) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 95-06 was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 14th day of March, 1995, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 28th day of March 1995, by the following vote, to wit: COUNCILlVl]EMBERS: NOES: CO~CH,MEMBM: CO~CILMEMBERS: June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk 95-06 29 ITEM 20 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPRO CITY ATTORNEY RNANCE OFFICE CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Gary Thornhill, Director of Plan 'ng~'')'' March 28, 1995 Request. to Support the State of California Wildlife Conservation Board Acquisition of the Hidden Valley Ranch Prepared By: Craig D. Ruiz, Assistant Planner RECOMMENDATION: Receive Report and Provide Direction to Staff to Draft a Letter of Support for the Mayor's Signature BACKGROUND On March 16, 1995, the Riverside County Habitat Conservation Agency (RCHCA) Board of Directors directed their staff, at the request of the Preserve Our Plateau Committee, to write a letter supporting the purchase of the Hidden Valley Ranch. The Hidden Valley Ranch is a 430 acre parcel of land surrounded on three sides by the Santa Rosa Plateau Ecological Reserve (See Attachment No. 1 ). The State of California Wildlife Conservation Board is currently considering the acquisition of the Hidden Valley Ranch for the purposes of adding the land to the Reserve. The purchase would be funded entirely by the State. The RCHCA Board requested that member cities also consider writing a letter supporting the purchase. Councilmember Parks, the Council's representative to the RCHCA, requested that this item be placed before the Council to consider said request. FISCAL IMPACT None. Attachments: 1. Letter of Request from the Preserve Our Plateau - Page 2 R:\STAFFRPT\HIDDENVL.CC 3/20/95 kLb 1 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 LET!'ER OF REQUEST FROM THE PRESERVE OUR PLATEAU R:\STAFFRPT\HZDDEIWL.CC 3/20/95 kLb 2 IThUrSday March ¶6 1995 5:26m -- From ,71A7872509' -- Ptge 2'~ · , ,11 · ~ slrongl~ supporting_ a $2.1 mi!lioo aUocxtio. from t~e Sine of Califomi~ Wildill; ~ Board for zquisitio~ Community suiVxt ~! be critical A ~ leemr is AddreuyourleUere: W. JolmSchmidt, EucutiveDirector Wildlife Cassenmioa Board 801 K Sinset, Suite 806 Sacrammt~CA ~14 SUPPORT for mddm Vattey -dd;dm to Stun RMa Plmmu Ecological Reserve. Riva'side County //~-- golden eagles, black-shouldered kites, SWainsort's hawks, Ixarrowing owls, and lmg-em, ed owls. · This is a unique oppornmity m comfr~ California's wildlife befitage in a large, ecelogically ~pinrfil] UlfiL · The Phican will be essential for s,--o, ssfui coxdpgchcnsive. mlti~ ~'i~ planning in - The Hidden Vsney Ranch is Ibe beldwau3 for Cole Creek, is impomm to the bydrology of the · The Hidden Vailey Ranch would pme sevem nmmgement Problems of it were imt t° devHopment, as ith surround~d on three sides by the existing Reserve. · The acquisition can help serve the needs ofpeople forpmssive reueMimt and tranquili~.as re'ban · As a supesq. unique. and lxnn~fui example as Califotnia's natural heritage. the protection of the TH..Uq!E YOU VERY MUCH I I I | | II II I I I I I / ' ITEM 21 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROV CITY ATTORNE~~ FINANCE OFFIC R CITY MANAGE CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Gary Thornhill, Director of Plannin~ March 28, 1995 Winchester 1800 Specific Plan Prepared By: RECOMMENDATION: Saied Naaseh, Associate Planner Provide direction to staff to prepare City's official response to the Board of Supervisors April 11, 1995 hearing regarding Winchester 1800 Specific Plan. BACKGROUND The Board of Supervisors continued this item to the April 11,1995 hearing. City staff has had a limited time to provide comments on the Specific Plan. The following general comments are from the Planning, Public Works and Community Services Departments reflect the various department's opinions. After the City Council meeting staff will prepare a letter to the Board of Supervisors delineating the City's comments and concerns. The attached Land Use Map is the latest available to staff. The Land Use Map might further be amended since additional property owners have expressed a desire to be left out of the Specific Plan. Since this a multiple ownership Specific Plan, perhaps it is best for the County to prepare the Specific Plan to cover the entire project area. General Plan Consistency The General Plan Land Use Map reflects an earlier version of the Winchester 1800 Land Use Map. The distribution of land uses on the most recent plan are similar to the General Plan. The General Plan specifically requires the Specific Plan to provide pedestrian linkages between commercial areas, schools, and parks. Moreover, the General Plan requires the Specific Plan be sensitive to adjacent rural residential and Lake Skinner Recreation Area. The Specific Plan proposes a limited network of off-street trails along the drainage channels; however, these trails are only connected with expanded parkways that include sidewalks. The Land Use Map is not sensitive to the adjacent rural residential uses and the Lake Skinner Recreation Area as it does not provide transition and buffer areas. R:\STAFFRPT\1800.CC 3121/95 ktb 1 Land Use Patterns The project proposes 65 acres of commercial uses on four different sites plus a 36 acre Commercial Recreation area next to Lake Skinner. No analysis has been provided to support the viability of these commercial uses. The proposed Land Use Map includes 4972 residential units. The majority of them (approximately 3000 units) are 7200 square foot lots; approximately 1000 are 5000 square foot lots; about 800 are high density; and 250 are low density with minimum half acre lots. Land Use Compatibility The Specific Plan is not compatible with the surrounding land uses that include Lake Skinner and very low density residential with 1,2.5, and 5 acre minimum lot sizes. The Specific Ran needs to be sensitive to these surrounding uses by providing similar uses, buffers, and-. transition areas within the Specific Plan. The Specific Ran does not have internally compatible land uses. Large 2-3 acre lots are immediately adjacent to 5000-7200square foot lots or commercial areas. Internal transition areas and adequate buffers need to be provided. Ooen Soace and Biology The open space within the Specific Plan is minimal. The total open space provided is 148 acres which is approximately eight percent of the total area. Planning Areas 20 and 25, two separate hills, are proposed as open space for a total of 74 acres. Additionally, two drainage courses for a total of 74 acres are being preserved as open space with proposed trails. Adequate linkage is not provided between these open space areas other than street sidewalks. These linkages, if provided, would enhance the movement of wildlife within the project which would eventually lead to other wildlife corridors outside of the project such as the Skinner and Domenigoni preserve areas. Planning Areas 20 and 25 contain Riversidian Sage Scrub which is habitat to many sensitive species. However, these Planing Areas are separated by Street "A" and 7200 square foot lots which reduces the long term viability of the habitat area. The road should be re-routed and the area between these two Planning Areas should be dedicated as open space. At a minimum a viable biological connection needs to be provided between the two Planning Areas. The biological study identifies additional Riversidian Sage Scrub between these Planning Areas. The project is proposing to eliminate 2.5 acres of wetland/Willow Riparian Woodland which is a significant biological resource. This resource should be preserved. parks Based upon the Riverside County park land dedication requirement of three (3) acres per thousand residents, Specific Plan No, 286 proposes to dedicate 38,7 acres of park land for public use. The City of Temecula has higher park land dedication requirement of five (5) acres per thousand residents. Pursuant to this standard, the City's park land requirement for this project would be approximately 63.4 acres, However, since the entire 38,7 acres of parks is identified within the Winchester 1800 development, it is possible that the apparent shortfall R:\STAFFRPT\1800.CC 3/21/95 ktb 2 in park land could be mitigated through additional land dedications or payment of in-lieu fees applied to the remaining portions of the Specific Plan. It should also be noted that the City only accepts park land that is developable for active park use. The City does not consider open space, slopes, trails or floodway areas as credit towards the overall park land dedication requirements. in addition, the City requires that all park sites are fully improved to the City standards and dedicated pursuant to a pre-determined number of building permits for the project. While Specific Plan No. 286 references that parks will be constructed during certain phases of development, it does not indicate a definite timetable for park dedications. Community Services supports the concerns from the Riverside County Regional Park and Open Space District to address the trail and bike path alignments designated within SWAP. In addition, all proposed trails and bike lanes shall be consistent with the City's General Plan and Parks and Recreation Master Plan. A Bike Lane Exhibit is recommended to identify Class I and: Class II bike lanes on all roadways 66' or wider. Community Services highly recommends the establishment of an active Home Owners' Association (HOA) to provide for the maintenance of common open space areas, walls, fences, and interior landscaping. The City's Landscape Maintenance Program is limited to perimeter landscaping adjacent to single family residential development. Therefore, the City cannot commit to the acceptance of fee title of open space areas or easements that were accepted by, or reserved to, the County Service Area (CSA). The City reserves the right to accept only those areas that are consistent with the City's Maintenance Program. All other areas would be required to be maintained by the HOA. Circulation Public Works staff has reviewed the Traffic Study and has prepared the following comments: Additional intersections which should be included in this evaluation are: Winchester Road at Beeler Road/Street "A" Washington Street at Keller Road Washington Street at Auld Road The site access exhibit shown in this report does not reflect access points as submitted on the preliminary land use plan dated February 6, 1995· This exhibit is inconsistent with City Standards. The section, "Accommodation for Alternative Modes", covers transit as the only alternative mode of transportation. There is little or no discussion about non-motorized transportation. It is felt a project of this magnitude should include a comprehensive plan for such transportation including Class II & III bike lanes and specific alignment routes for Class I bike paths and multi-use trails. Although the developer went to great effort to prepare an infrastructure financing plan, the resulting funding mechanism for providing the necessary infrastructure to serve this project (a special fee district through the County of Riverside) may not be the most efficient means of providing these facilities. It also may result in these roads being built "behind the R:\STAFFRPT\1800,CC 3/21/95 ktb 3 development curve". It may be preferable for the project to be conditioned to construct certain off-site infrastructure elements based on a balancing of mitigation responsibilities. Drainage A Hydrology Study was not submitted with the EIR, making it difficult to analyze drainage concerns. $taff's concerns regarding drainage were addressed in the EIR as follows: CONCERN: Portions of the Specific Plan are within a floodplain area, resulting in potential flood hazards. MITIGATION: Section 18: 'Proposed grading shall meet FEMA standards for 100-year flood protection to all habitable dwellings located in a floodplain." CONCERN: Any construction of buildings, roads and other impervious surfaces will result in increased on-site storm water runoff and the grading of existing on-site drainage courses including some "blueline" streams. MITIGATION: Section 20: "Any impact to the blueline watercourses shall be subject to the requirements of an Army Corps of Engineer 404 permit and a Department of Fish and Game 1601 or 1603 permit." " CONCERN: The project lies within the Dam Inundation Area of Lake Skinner, potentially exposing future residents to flooding in the event of dam failure due to seismic event. MITIGATION: Section 21: "All final subdivision maps will indicate that the proposed project lies in a potential dam inundation zone of Lake Skinner. Coordination between the applicant and the County Disaster Preparedness Office in establishing emergency evacuation routes.' CONCERN: According to the EIR, the Project's 100 year outflow will increase from 17,300 cfs in the natural condition to 20,680 cfs in the developed condition. The northern part of the project will discharge off-site into the proposed Quinta do Logo Specific Plan. Increased flow rates from the project may contribute to cumulative increased flow. rates downstream and the potential for flooding in areas with undersized facilities. The proposed Drainage Plan utilizes the projects's streets, underground storm drains, and open channels (turf end concrete-lined) to carry storm water through the project. The drainage system is designed to utilize the existing natural drainage courses wherever feasible. MITIGATION: Section 19: 'Storm drain and flood control facilities discharging at the tract boundary shell be deigned in order to outlet at the pre-existing velocity and depths in order to minimize impacts to the downstream property owner.' R:\STAFFRPT\1800.CC 3/21/95 ktb 4 RCFCD condition: 'This project should include retention facilities in the design that would control runoff of all storms up to a one in one hundred year storm st that the downstream peak flow would not increase due to this development. These retention facilities should be designed in conformance with a watershed wide retention policy that would be implemented by the Board. CONCERN: The project will be required to obtain the appropriate NPDES construction permit, in order to eliminate pollutants in the storm water discharge to the greatest extent possible (including silt). MITIGATION: Section 23: 'All projects proposing construction activities which is part of a larger common plan of development of five acres or greater shall obtain the appropriate NPDES construction permit." CONCERN: The Specific Plan lies within the boundaries of the Riverside County Flood Control District (RCFCD) Murrieta Master Area Drainage Plan and should therefore be conditioned to participate by paying the appropriate fees. MITIGATION Section 22: 'The project site is within the RCFC & WCD Murrieta Creek Area Drainage Plan and will be subject to drainage fees of e 1,023 and 9530 per acre, respectively.' According to the EIR, these proposed systems will be designed per RCFCD requirements. The major drainage facilities will be maintained by RCFCD end Riverside County Transportation Department. The local drainage facilities will be maintained by County Service Area, RCFCD or similar public/private agencies. Water and Sewer All systems will be designed and installed per Eastern Municipal Water District requirements. For the most part, the Mitigation Monitoring Program associated with the EIR has adequately addressed Staff's concerns with respect to drainage, circulation, and utilities. However, in order to minimize the negative impacts to the City of Temecula associated with this project, it is critical that the Responsible Party/Monitoring Party (the County of Riverside) follow the mitigation program closely during the implementation or development stage of the project. FISCAL IMPACT None Attachments: Winchester 1800 Land Use Map - Page 6 Various Correspondence - Page 7 R:\STAFFRPT\1800.CC 3/21/95 ktb 5 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 WINCHESTER 1800 LAND USE MAP R:\STAFFRPT\1800.CC 3121/95 kLb 6 P.A. 17 P.A. In P.A.I _ Very Illlh '~ P,L IS P.A. 14 * Preliminary Land Use Plan WINCHESTER 1800 181~ 14~,Azt~ur BIrd.. ~ iO0. h'vW~. CA It/IS t~mm [ ATTACHMENT NO. 2 VARIOUS CORRESPONDENCE R:\STAFFRPT\1800.CC 3/21/95 ktb City of Temecula 43174, Business Park Drive · Temecula, California 92590 (9CF7) 694-198<7 · FAX (909) 694-1999 Ma~h 3, 1995 Preston Gibson llI COscan/Stewart Partnership Suite 30 1520 Brookhollow Drive Santa Aria, CA 92705 Dear Mr. Gibson: The purpose of thi.~ letter it to inform you that the City Council has scheduled their review Of the Winchester 1800 Specific Plan for its March 28, 1995 meeting. We expect to be able to provide official comments to you and the Board of Supervisors following that meeting. ff you have any additional questions concerning thig letter or would like to meet to discuss specific issues, please contact me at (909) 694-6400. Sincerely, Gary Thornhill Director of planning R:%HOGAND%SP286-2.LTR 3/3/95 oaf ~)Prir~ed on Recycled PaOer. PARK ENGINEERING DXTE: TRANeMITTAL TIMB: C~P~Y taxi NUMBER OF BHIBT8 (ZlIGIfUDIIIO LEAD 8HB/T):- .- 6430 leXdee ST. m ENIK, Cl ~062Z - (/14)S2Z-46~O - FAX (ll4)Slt-lt/O cc: R. Bradley G. ~hornhill 11): lemeadm (:t~ (,~uwdl R. ls Wirecreator IN)0 Project !kmr 11,b letter b In oppodtJen to 1be Wtmebeeter 1800 l'rejegt elms yea wl be karbm nab evealto Due to eel' .... S eebedele~ ! me metMe to arMrod, but went to meke dear my ,~ost"~t, mul thee of my $arl.mmmd~ ~ I$ iS SI$' b$imt epimio$t lied $m$l$$tiou, that tbe City of T~ -:-./P met Bream ¢emaq, bad, ia. tim WtoSketer IMO Prmjmet, the Jobmoo bueh ProJect, or setS, orbs. eoeue ~ t~ earrealty mad rural end eFkelturaL 11te City or Treeeels item witbb fee bonedmales jellkieet lend for build-oUt Of ebouemmb ef yet uneoewecied ,midam. 11m h--~ :st emmumlt~ omuw, eu ,in, w~ is is ETR. Mmtve peiHdatiem tlmt eun'oafiy mmm4 ass the fe~-I~V, wltk lelllle Jams tlaroulbout fiat e, tt)', wrdl be tarled eva furtim' witit mm a~ ~i" el twenty vok_leedmr traf/iea per day, mat or Ihm preJoete* liMbwaY '3~ led laucb6 (hilterda bad wB Ibm need to be wldemod to sis lime bilhwe3m te bade thte mmoMMt The qUatutneee of Temmll Im qwk~17 e'-~i~t~-- h-I, aud omlY fereellbt em ties pert emm stop lamp-fro8 etpmndoetmm, Pieale mllt t)J~ momq, devdopee~ mad temptation to eover the rural b~ut3~ of TemMub with meat mini tile Rimeerd),, !)evM C. JLobbseoe, Diplomete of the Ames'lie totrd of humfly Practice 714-6771716 RRT PRSTOOR Be1 F~I FEB 14 '~5 16:419 _ . CODYSALES Februmy 18,. 1995 '4 221g03Vilde(:iemll, h~~~925R 900 6774346 i FAX 906 677-1716 cc: R. Bradley G,;tltornhl-11~ Temecula Mayer Jeff 8tone and Coundl Ms,,bcrs Undeman. s, Munoz, Parks, end Roberrs Temecula City;Hi 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 Dear Coundl Members: imwrmng bt regerd to the i , >c Wlnciteater leOOproject (O 4mk, Ran ;286), IocatedwithinTemecule'saphemofinteteL I am concemed about tbe potential end historic. Among the resources to. be impacted are several NaUve Arner!oen archaeological sites .: and several hleloric etructures, These ere known sites of moegnized.mgtorml. iml:g)rtBnce. Of Particular h~blf It ill a Native Americ~ cerr3~f, ai,ffi' ~ ind.l.~tng · sign~icance.. ,. As a local reeldent with 8 background in history and Cultural reeources management, and as lest preaident of the Teme Valley Museum, I reeo~.d~e the. value of these sites to Tams ~ule Valley end River~de Coun~ hb~on/. The/~ ~ndure ~ the unklue ~haremer of Wds are~ and their ~ should be Inoorpo~ into any development Pbr4. .. · Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely,. Jolene Cody Peetoor cc: G. Thornhill Friends of the Alamos District 37100 Los Alamos Road Murrieta, CA 92563 January 19, 1995 Honorable Jeff Stone, Mayor Council Members City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 Re: Winchester 1800 Specific Plan Dear Mayor Stone and Council Members, During a recent County hearing I attended on the Winchester 1800 Specific Plan in French Valley, several Riversida County supervisors expressed an interest in knowing if Temecula supports the project. The project's EIR includes a letter from the Temecula planning staff but does not indicate your city's direct support. County supervisors expressed the following concerns: (1) The project is untimely and will introduce urban development into the rural residential area at least 2 1/2 miles from urban areas at Silverhawk and within Temecula's city limits. (2) There are no financing mechanisms for its impacts on water, sewer, and road facilities including Winchester Road. (3) It does not conform to the County General Plan. Members of the public were also concerned that the plan for Murrieta Creek does not take into account the Winchester 1800 runoff; that mitigations for project impacts on historic and prehistoric sites are deferred and piecemealed; and that the project's traffic will increase noise, community fragmentation, and emissions in the area. Several speakers proposed reducing dwelling units and commercial areas and advocated clustering development. The City could help resolve these issues. Would it be possible for your Planning Commission to review the project and make recommendations? Would the City also be interested in development a phasing plan for urbanization in French Valley? I know you all share concerns for the area's economic development and quality of life. Phasing may be one means to encourage timely economic developments within Temecula itself. The hearing on the project has been continued to February 28. Residents in the area would much appreciate your active involvement in the review in any way possible. Thank you very much for your consideration of the matter. Sincerely, Rita Gentry Spokesperson The Resource~ A~ency BanlC of America or cdaro a- ' ....' '°' °"' February 1995 Dear Colleague: Enclosed you will find an important report, Beyond Sprawl: Ne~ Patterns of Growth.w Fit the Ne~ California, that addresses one of ~he most impor2nt issues facing C~lifomia- the manner in which the state will grow in the remaining years of this century and into the next. The report offers a variety of ideas and recommendations as to how Californians -- individ- ual citizens, businesses, government leaders, and communities alike -- can work together to ensure that C~lifornia continues to grow economically and provide its residents an atutctive, high-clu. ality place to live and work. The sponsors of this report- Bank of America, the California Resources Agency, Greenbelt Alliance, and the Low Income Housing Fund -- believe that California must pursue growth and development that is sustainable. Unfettered sprawl will make the state less competitive, burden taxpayers with higher costs, degrade the environment, and lower the quality of life for every Californian. We believe the time to act is now. We have produced this report with the hope that it will help focus the public dialogue about C~lifornia's growth and move it forward in ways that wffi provide the greatest benefits for ourselves and future generations. Thank you for your time and consideration. If you would like additional copies of this report, please contact any of the sponsoring organizations listed on the final page. Sincerely, Dick Rosenberg B~ oF AMW, XC.A G~ELT ALLIANCE Douglas P. Wheeler CAIJFORNA RESOURCES AGENCY Daniel M. Leibsohn Low INCOM~ HOUSnqG FUND BEYOND SPRAWL: N :w PATTERNS OF GROWTH TO THE N :W CALWOnNt EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Califorma is at.a unique and unprecedented point in its history--a point atwhich we face profound questions about our future growth that will determine the state's economic vitality and quality of life for the next gener- ation and beyond. One of the most .fundamental questions we face is whether California can afford to support the pattern of urban and suburban development, o~en referred ~ as "sprawl," that has characterized its growth since Worm War II. There is no question that this pat- tern of growth has helped fuel Califomia's unparalleled economic and population boom, and that it has enabled millions of Californians to real- ize the enduring drum of home owner- ship. But as we ~pproach the 21st century, it is clear that sprawl has creat- ed enormous costs that California can no longer afford. Ironically, unchecked sprawl has shifted from an engine of Califomia~ growth to a force that now threateus to inhibit growth and degrade the quality of our life. This report, sponsored by a diverse coalition of organizations, is meant to serve as a call for California to move beyond sprawl and rethink the way we will grow in the future. This is not a new idea, but it is one that has never Despite dramatic changes in California over the last decade, traditional devel- opment patterns have accelerated. Urban job centers have decentralized to the suburbs. New housing tracts have moi~ed even deeper inw agricultural and environmentally sensitive areas. Private auto use continues to rise. This acceleration of sprawl has sur- faced enormous social, environmental and economic costs, which until now have been hidden, ignored, or quietly bume by society. The burden of these costs is becoming very Clear. Businesses suffer frmn higher costs, a loss in work- er productivity, and underutilized investments in older communities. California's business climate becomes less attractive than surround- ing states. Suburban residents pay a expenses, while residents of older cities and subufos lose access to jobs, social stability, and political power. Agri- culture and ecosystems also suffer. There is a fundan~ntal dynamic to growth, whether it be the growth of a community .or a ~orporation, that evolves from expansion to maturity. The early stages of growth are often exuberant and unchecked--that has certainly been the case in post-World War II California. But unchecked growth cannot be sustained forever. At some point this initial surge must mature inw more managed, strategic gxowth. This is the point whe~ we now stand in California. We can no longer afford the luxury of sprawl. Our demographics axe shift:- ing in dramatic ways. Our economy is been more critical or urgent. heavy price in marion and automobile resu'ucuning. Our environment is under increasing stress. We cannot shape · . .~ .. . .~~ ~ This is not a call for limiting corn. qr~ ~ ~' S- .- , growth, but a call for California to be V: will ~'i ineaninifuI ~bnt~budon to the public dialogue about the quality California 'i quality of life and economic "Even as our economy and our society are being reinvented daily, we continue to abandon · '- people and investments. r}:: . ~.grow ~ BEYOND SPRAWL It is a tall order---one that calls for us to rise above our occasional isolation as individuals and interest groups, and address these profound challenges as a community. All of us-government agen- cies, businesses, community organizations and citizens--plaY a role. Our actions should be guided by the following goals: · To provide more certainty in determining wher~ new devel- opment should and should not : · Tomakemo~dftcicntnscofisnd including a strong focus on job cn~ttion and housing in estab~ · ToostabtishalegalandF°ccdunl cextainty and send the rill economic · Tobuildabroad-basectconstimencY to combat sprawl that includes govcnuncnt leadca and others- Californians atg already taking some of these steps. We bave attemla~d in this report to not oaly point out the obstacles to sustained growth, but also m highlight the positive actions that ax~ occtm4alg Io better manage growth. Our fundamental message is that we must build on these early suc- cesses and take more comprehensive and decisive steps over thc uext fcw yeazs to meet this challenge. To build a stxong, ,n*brant economy and ensug a high quality of tile for the 21st centroT, we must move beyond sprawl in the few remaining years of the 20th cennuT. In the face of this change, California remains shackled to costly patterns of sub- urban sprawl. Even as our economy and our society are being reinvented daily, we continue to abnndon people and invest- ments in older communities as develop- meat leap-frogs out to fringe areas to accommodate another generation of low- density living. And we continue to create communities that rely almost exclusively on automobiles for wansportation. In short, the =new" California--with 32 million people and counting--is using land and other resources in much the same fashion as the "old" California, with only 10 rail-' lion people. We cannot afford another generation of sprawl. As the Governor's Growth Management Council stated in a recent report: "What may have been possible with l0 or even 20 million people is simply not sustainable for a population of twice that much in the same space." Continued sprawl may seem inexpensive for a new homebuyer or a growing business on the suburban fringe., but the ultimate cost-=m tho~ homeowners, t~th~ govcrnmcnt, and Allowing sprawl ma~ be politically expe- dient in tlz short rim, but in the long run it ~ will make California economically uncom- petitire and crea~ social, environmental and political problems we may not be able m solve. ~ At a time when economic growth is slow and social tensions a~ high, it is usy ' m dismiss an issu~ like suburban sPrawl as superfluous. Yet it lies at th~ heart of the very economic, social and environmental ' issues that we face Kxiay. Rapid populatiun growth and eamomic change are occurring in a state increasingly characterized by a limited supply of d=velopable land, environmental stress at the metropolitan fa:mge, and older communities in transition- With th~ onset of economic t~covcry, next few years will give rise to land-us~ decisions of fundamental imponanc=- Th~ will help determine whether our staz can succeed in t~-establishing th= ~conomic anti social vitality that have mad~ it such a successful place to live and work for than 140 years. INTRODUCTION California is at the crossroads of teqnlmtuemty anofdaestae'smajor} is changing dramatically. New racial and truly multiculnn~ society, a~ating a vsiety same time, CalifomiatmsemerSedasnoe°f mexopolitan areas continue m grow in popu- Suburban Sprawl and the "Old" California In the decades after World War H, California emerged as an economic and political powerhouse, providing jobs, hous- ing and prosperity for most of its rapidly growing population. Underlying this success was a devel- opment pattern that emphasized expanding metropolitan areas, conversion of farmland and natural ~reas to residential use, and heavy use of the antomobile. In ~ postwar ~ this way of life .worked for C. alifomia- With a prosperous and land-rich state, most families were able to rise to the middle class and achieve the dream of home own- ership. Government agencies and private businesses were able to provide the infra- structure of growth--new homes, roads, schools, water systems, sewage treatment facilities, and extensions of gas and electric disuibutiom Within the last generation, however, this postwar formula for success has become overwhelmed by its own conse- quences. Since the 1970s, housing has become more expensive, roads have become more congested, the supply of developable land has dwindled, and, because of increasing costs, government agencies have not been able to keep up with the demand for public services. Since the late 1970s, several efforts have been initiated to address the question of how to manage California's grow~ but all have failed---some for lack of consen- sus, some for lack of engaged constituency, sumc simply because of bad timing. THE CHALLENGE OF THE "NEW" CALIFORNIA n the 1990s, California is undergoing change of such scale and significance Ithat it will literally rede~n~ the state. To succeed, the new California must recog- nize and build upon the following changes in positive ways. Population Growth California's population continues to grow at a remarkably fast pace. Today's total of approximately 32 million people t~-presents a doubling of the population since the mid- 1960s, when California became the nation's most populous state. I)uting the boom years of the 1980s, California n_d_~ed_ more than 6 million new residems, a population larger than all but a few of the 49 other states. Even during the bust years of the early 1990s, the state's population grew at a rate of almost a half- million people per year--in effect, adding another Oakland or Fresno every year-- even as we have suffered a net loss in the number of jobs. This continuing surge in pupuhtion pots pressure on both existing communities BEYOND SPRAWL and on the remaining supply of undevel- oped land, making it extremely difficult for traditional suburban patterns to accommo- dote more people. Changing Demographics While growing rapidly° Califomia's popu- lation is also changing in significant ways. The demographic changes are well docu- mented. Lndnos-=whose roots extend to Mexico, Central America, South America,: and the Cazil>bean---arc growing rapidly in number and may noraumber Artgins a gen- eration from now. Californians of Asian ancestry now make up ahnest 10 percent of an important racial group, and the state's metric is rounded out by Native Americans, immigrants from South Asia and the Middle East, and others who bring great dlvenity to the state. California is truly one of the worid's most multicultural societies. 'Underneath the racial diversity lies another important change in the state's population patterns that will have a profound effect on California's attitudes toward growth over the next generation. Traditionally, the popular perception haSbeen that Culifomia's population ~'ows because of migration from other pa.qs of the United States. However popular, this perception is no longer true. Most new Californians now come from other coun- The birth rate is also an increasing source of population growth. During the 1990s recession, "natural increase"~e net total of births over deaths--has accounted for almost 400,000 new people each year. Tomorrow's California will inctu~for the first time---a vast pool of ,. people who are Californians from birth. They will want What Californians before them have wanted---education, jobs and a way to accommodate them. But their numbers are so huge that they probably cannot be sustained by traditional subufoan development patterns. Economic Change During the recession, California has undergone an unprecedented economic testructttring. The stui'' has lost 400,(XX} :':.:. .-.:-L.~':' -'-..' -. ,' sm'ge in population puts · , :-/. . .~ .... . · ,..',~ .. -. · .:,;Z~.,~,~:.~=~ :' ~.~.~,~;,~.~'.:j..::;:.~ .. . - .:/~t~ · . .:~-:-.: .. .Easy mobility for the middle class.has caused them to abandon many ':' oMeF neighborhoods~:' '~ ia . BEYOND SPRAWL manufacturing jobs since 1990, causing businesses and workers alike to rethink old assumptions about how to ensure prosperity. Traditional foundations of the state's economy. such as newspace and defense, have been drastically reduced and will probably never return, at least not in their previous form. Others---such as entertain- ment, technology, the garment industry and agriculture--=remain just as important us ever. But they too have undergone dous change, becoming leaner and more efficient in response m global competitiop- And small businesses t~nain the largest source of new job creation. In the near f~ture, the impact of the North American Free Trade ASlzement will beg to be fdt. These economic changes are also l~ninJ ln~ssure on the state's hind-use pat- terns. The loss of manufacturing jobs is; emptying out the state's long-established industrial he, as, usually located in older communities. Dm~tsizing and zchnologi- cat change in other indusnies is also defing older building obsolete and treat- - ing a demand for new boildings~fzen in new ~uburbs---that are both inexpensive and flu~ble- The closure of many m~tary tmu is bringing a huge amount of land to the real estate madoct that will either extend sprawl or encourage new development patterns, depending on how Spreading Urbanintion nomic pmuum, CaUfon~a has t~:ome the most urbanized state in the union. A~cording to the 1990 Census, more than 80 puz:ent of all Californians live in meu~ polltan amns of 1 mi~on people or ~ with 30 percent of the state's population This large-scale urbanization means that Califomia's people and businesses compete intensely with each other for space to live and work. The edges of metropolitan areus continue to grow to accommodate expansion of population and economic activity, whUe some ncgleaed inner-city areas are left behind. These patterns increase the stress of daily life while, at the same time, put mote pressu~ on land and environmental resources at the metropolitan fzinge~ SPRAWL AND ITS CAUSES I! of these factors-=a growing pop- changing economy, and uxkmnization--have been present in California for many yeats. But they have accelerated in the 1990s. while tr4ditional suburban development patients have continued. In a state with such power- rut ~'owth dynamics, the resui~ a=e aston- ishing. The following trends a~ P/pical of the effects of sprawl over the last 10 to 20 yean: · Employment centers have decen- tralized dramatically. While jobs used to be concutlramd. in central cities, most axe now cmsled in the newer suburbs. For e-~l~".~ the complex of offwe centm around John Wayne Ahpon in Orange County--built on !and that was, until a generation ago, cuttivalnt for tima ~tly smlmssed downtown San Francisco as the sinand-largest employment center in the state. · New housing tracts tam pushed ronnaentaily sensitive areas, Job centers in suburban Sanlnse and the · East Bay areahave opemdup TracY, V alley tom as "l~dm0m subre'ha," while job ~rewtkvin the San Fenrondo Valley tm ssln=,~nted housing construction 40 miles to the north in the Antelope Valey. This development has crealed meuopolis- es ViXTt!~y 11nmine~2fV' in ~ · Dependence oo the rammobile has between t~70 and 1990 ~ sme's polxfiation grew by 50 iss~nt, but the total number of ~ wavded by · tsointion ofouler c= -rues, including central ~ and 'qlrst and DSQs~ has increased- Easy mobility for the tnic!t~e ~ has _--_,t~ed them to abandon many older izationofjobshesbit&!erneigh- betboodsespec~yhad, becanse new jobe are now vinna!ly inac__~--~- ble to the poor and the ~nting class. Also left behind m~ inf~c- dously expensive to tqticate in new Even thouBh the c~nse,p-" of s!x~wl attempm to combat it have been fragmented and imffective- The engine of sprawt is fueled by a mix of individual choices, market forces, and government policies, most of which have only become more entrenched over time. [] A perception that new suburbs are safer and more desirable than existing communities. Many people believe that suburbs provide ~ with good vflue--snfe su~'ts, neigh- hothood schools, a "smaft-town" atomsphere, clo~ proximity to their local governments, and new (though not n_~___~ily better) community · A perception that suburbs are cheaper than urban alternatives. Owning a starter home in a distant new sul~rb is still within the finan- cial reach of a typical family, despite family's financial equation, howev- er, does not ~ into accoant the larger cost to society of far-flung suburbs--a cost the faznily will ~venmally sha~ in paying. · A belief that suburban communities will give businesses more ~e~'bility to grow. Businesses welcome the tax incentives and fn~eclom from heavy regulation that am often provided in newer suburban cmnmu- nifies trying to develop a strong business base. Businesses also view sutm/oan l~ations as safer--a view reflected in the cost of insuran~e-- and they perceive they will have · Technological changes that have decentralized employment away from traditional contess. This phenongnon permits dispenal of both jobs and houses a~ross a huge m The ~rner~enc~ of rig "infor- mation superhighway" my a~eler- · llighway and automobile subsidies that have traditionally fueled sub- urban growth retain in place today. Sinco the 1950s, autonmbile u.m has be~n encouraged by guvem- merit-financed road-building pro- grams, and for the most part tl~ "extnnal costs" of automobil~ use (i.e., air pollution) have not been the direct financial responsibility of the individual motorist. BEYOND SPRAWL · ~ !and-use polkies tint inad- vertently ~nuse sprawl. In many older subut'oan communities, "slow- growth" attitudes rutrict new clevel- opment. pushing employment and housing growth to the metropolitan fringe. With a lack of regional plan- ning, e~h community pursues its own self-interests, regarcll~ss of costs imposed on other communities. · Fiscal incentives that encourage Iocl governments to "cherry- pick" land uses based on tax con- siderations. Under Proposition 13' s property-tax limitations, there is lit- ~ fiscal incentive for many commu- nities to accept affordal~ housing-- and when such housing is built, developers must usually pay heavy ~leveloptn~nt f~es. Meanwhile, be~__u~ communities must raise rev- auto denim and renilezs, both big sales-tax pmducors, receive subsi- dies to locam in communities. The result of all these factors is a' sever~ r~gional irabalance. Housing, jobs, across a hugo a~a and long auto trips a~ often required to connect them. Such a development pattnn impos~s a consiclerab!~ cost on all who us~ it, though the costs a~ often hidden and thos~ who pay them are not always aware of it. THE COST OF SPRAWL he cost and consequences of sprawl have been documented among acad- Tnnics and planning experts for more than two deades. In the e~rly 1970s, phno JOhn Blayney produ~'d a lanamark study showing that in some cases, a Califomi~ community would be betmr off financially if it used a combination of zoning and !and a~qulsifion instead of Ignnining develop- merit of low-density subdivisious. A few years later, the U.S. Council on mark repor~ ~te Coff of Sprawl--the first comprehensive analysis of sprswl's tree fit analysis m-Jmiquas have b~onm mor~ t~finext, the mg cost of sprawl has bKotn~ much mor~ apparent. Today, no one in California is unaff~- ed by tim cost of sprawl. Its cot.seqnences spread across all groups, regardless of geography, race, income, or political sums- !i BEYOND SPRAWL i']. "A recent Survey by T~xpayers Sprawling suburbs may be cheaper in the short-term for individuals and families who buy houses in new communities, but their "hidden" costs may ultimately be passed on to taxpayers in a variety of ways. · The cost of building and maintaining highways and other major infrastruc- ture improvements to serve distant suburbs. · The cost of dealing with social prob- lems that fester in older neighbor- hoods when they are neglected or abandoned- · The cost of solving environmental problems (wedands, endangered "species, air pollution, water pollu- tion) caused by development of vir- Taken together, it is clear that all these costs have conuibuted to Californin's dire fiscal situation during the 1990s, which has strained state and local government budgets to ~ bruking point. Businesses Many businesses benefit from suburban locations- But all businesses, both small and large, also bear many of the following costs. · Adverse impacts on the stnte's business dimate. By t~lucing the quality of life, sprawl has made California a less desirable location for business owners and potential employees. By increasing suburban resistance to ~ growth, sprawl has made it difficult for businesses to Both these trends increase the am'ac- tiveness of neighboring states such as Arizona, Nevada, and Utah. For example, a major ~m studio t~cent- ly decided to relocate its animadon because of lower housing prices and less traffic cougostion. · Higher 'direct business costs and taxes to offset the side*effects of sprawl This can include the cost of new business infrasuv~z or of midSating ttmtsporuttion and anvi- romnental problems. For example, in regulators have forced businesses m take the lead in fighting air pollution by initiating carpooling programs for their employees. · A geogrnphknl mismatch between workers and jobs, lending to high- er labor costs and a loss in worker productivity. Many workers mast now commute long distanc~ to their jobs, which takes a significant roll on their personal, family and profas- sional life. Many other workers are rgmoved from large portions of the job market simply because they can- not get to where the new jobs ar~. · Abandoned investments in older communities, which become eco- uomicaily uncompefitive because of sprawl and its associated subsi- dies. This is especially ~rue of the mte's utility companies, whose investments in gas, clecuk and ed in emblish.ed communities- Residents d New Suburbs There is no question that new suburban tesi- cknts axe, intoany ways, the ptincipat be~- ficimies d so~ sitawl Tnq often live many suburban residents arc becoming ~gly aware that they pay a high price for these bendits in the following ways. · The cost of automobiles- The average Califomian ~ one dollar out °f every five on buying and maintaining theircats. As acomequen~theY have leas to invest or spend on other items' · Time lost commuting to work and other destinations- A huge number of Californians now spend an hour or number continues to rise. A recent ConIra Costa Times sixowed that the commuto times for tmidents d 10 counties had inctasd an average °f 13 percent between 1980 and 1990. · Theeostdnewmburtmninfra' metme- Sutaeos me allen per- in fact. most new submhan homebuy- en in C.,alilornia musz pay addidoual taxes (usually !viello-Roos taxes) to cover the massive cost of new t°ads' additional taxes otkn have the effect of doubling a new homeowner's prolgt~ tax bill. Residents of Central Cities and Older Suburbs Residents of central cities and older sub- urbs are among the biggest losers in the sprawl process. Once they were among the most fortunate of metropolitan dwellers, because their central location provided access m jobs, shopping, and other arneni- ties. However, sprawl has penalized them by creating or accelerating the following · Loss of jobs and access to jobs. P,~sidents of older neighborhoods no longer have convenient access to most JObs. This is especially difficult for po~r and working<lass citizens who must rely on public nnspomtion, because it is difficult to commute to most suburban jobs without a car. · Economic segregation and less of social stability. By lag middle- class residents fix~m older neighbor- hoods, sprawl czr. ates destructive economic segzegafion and robs those neighboffioods of the social stability that will keep them viable. The dis- tn'bution of income becomes mote skewed, and it becomes incr~tsin~ly difficult for low-income people to · Underutilized or abandoned investments. Bttsinesses are not the only entities whose investments can become stranded when city neigh- borhoods decline. Individtutl home- ownen and small shopownen can also see a stagnation or decline in property val~es. And this Izend is not only visible in the inner city. Huge i~vestments in oldersubasban shop- ping contort, for example, ate now perceived as uncompetitive- · Shifts in poUtical powe' and gov- ernment servkes- By removing the middle cle~ of all races from older connntmities, sprawl makes it easier behind. Thus, revenues fall and it becomes mo~ difiicqllt for older ban--to maintain government ser- vices, and the incentive for home ownenhip t~luircd to provide the foundation for prosperity. BEYOND SPRAWL Farmers Agriculture remains one of Califomia's leading industries. Yet sprawl continues to take a. heavy toll on California agriculture in the following ways. · A permanent !~s of agricultural hnd. Between 1982 and 1987, the Central Valley--California's leading agricultural region--lost almost a half-million acres of productive fartnland. Somc of this land can be replaced by bringing new land into ag~cutmral ptoductioe, but often at cost. Also, many of California's replacedbylandinotherareas- Highly productive coastal agricultur- al lands lost to sprawl cannot be · A loss in productivity due to pollution. Sprawl-induced ozone pollution alone can tedme aop yields by as much as 30 percent. According to the Agricultural Issues Center at UC Davis, pollution- induced costs to ag~cttlm~ exceed $200 nnllion per year. · A decline in farm communities- As sprawl has eroded agricultural duction, the effect on farm commu- cases, rural communities have been trandormed into bedroom suburbs, ca~ting destructive commuting pet- terns while destroying ag~culture · Long-term uncertaintT. Sprawl the emptation to "sell out." The prospect of eventual sale to a devd- oper t~duces incentives for farmen to make long-term capial invest- ments. In many cases, fatmen stay afloat financially only by hormwing against the speculative value of their farm for develoPS a self-fuffillinS lwoVhec7 of sprawl. from increased demand for water for u~oan uses driven by sprawl psttens. The Environment Traditional development pariahs have taken a massive ton on all three basic elemems of the nannl envitonment:land, air, and water- BEYOND SPRAWL · Land: After 50 years of sprawl. California's metropolitan areus are enormous, reaching deep into natural · ecosystems that w~ thriving even a generation ago. Some 95 percent of the state's weeands have been destroyed over the last 200 yean, thrtaened- Also, California now has .the highest number of candidate and listed endangered species of any state--par~y because sprawl is diversiv/of biological systems. Sll~awl makes it mort dilTtcttlt to resolve these land conservation ias,.__~e~_ b~/putting tremendous development pres~trt on the supply of tanaining open land. lrmally, .. sprawl compromises one of the most essential assets of Califomi: ~e be_~_~_ry and drama of its landscape. Far fmm being just a luxury, this value of open space is an important component in ~ state's ability to attract and hold wotken and investors, · Air: CaUfm~ has the wo~ e quality in the nation, and air pollu- tion expazs estimate that a third of all air pollution emissions are trace- able to car and truck emissions exac- er~_e__,d by longer commutes and higher anto use. The South Coast Air Quality Management District, which has the strictest air-pollution rtgula- air pollution in ~e four-counv/Los Angeles area costs $7.4 bitlion per year, or about $600 per rtsident. Drantatic gains in pollution technol- ogy are likely to be offset by flirther sprawl According to air pollution extezt I.V. Hall, "The benefits of pollution-rtduction technology can easily be overwhelmed by our choic- es about where to live and work, aboat modes of travel, and about Inow many miles we driveJ' · Water:, Sprawl takes a serious toll on California's watet supply- Fotv/ of the state's 350 groundwater basins ate seriously ovetttral~t, and water planners predict that by 2020 the state wilt face a wate~ supply deffcit of between 2 million and 8 million acrt-feeL Though not the sole cause, inge development does make the water issue more expensive and comp~cated to manage. BEYOND SPRAWL n the postwar era, the continuous cycle Of suburban sprawl---counter-produc- Itive us it was in many ways--~tually helped to fuel California's prosperiv/, as consumption of new houses and new cats became one of the bases of our prosperity. It is clear, however, that the new California cannot sustain old patterns of ufoan devel- opment, if the state is to Fosper in the The sponsors of this repoa--Bank of Greenbelt Alliance, and the Low-Income Housing Fund--firmly believe that California cannot succeed unless the state moves beyond sprawl Stro~ policy dirtc- tion from our political leaders on beth the state and local level is essential But gov- ernment policies alone will not help California move forward. Our businesses, our community groups, and our citizens must also take the initiative. We must understand how sprawl affects each of us individually, how it impedes the state's Fogtess, and how it could make a prosper- ous futmz more diffictt to ghieve.. population growth wrtl requirt some degree of development on the suburban fringe. The question is whether we will be able to use existing urban and suburban land more efficiently in enier to minimize sprawl and protect valuable open spaces. The answen will lie in our ability to attract housing and tmsinesses to older urban and subufoan areas and to channd development on the fzinge to achieve the desired Fotec- Cagornia businesses cannot compete globally when they ate baxdened with the costs of sprawl. An attraaive business cli- mate cannot be SlBtained if tho qualiv/of life continues to decline and the cost of financing real estate development esca- lates. People in central cities and older sub- urbs cannot become pan of the btoader economy if sprawl cxa~innes to encourage disinvestment, and the state can neither afford to ignore nor fully subsidize these California must find a new develop- meat model We must aule mo~'cxanpa~ and efficient development patterns that gcommodate growth, 'pet help maintain Califomia's enviroumetnal balance and its economic compotitiveness- And we must encourage everyone in California to pro- pose and ~t~_~_te solutions to sprawl. A do-nothing approach, in effect, constitoles a policy decisi0a in favor of the satus quo. This, in fact, Ins been the de facto BEYOND SPRAWL direction for ~he l~t generation. While the state and the regions have created a lead- ership void in this area, many local gov- ernments have stepped in with their own policies, which often' have served m pro- mote sprawl rather titan prevent iL Recent research has shown that individual local growth-coutrol policies do nat stop devel- opment, but merely deflect it---often to another area further out on the metropolitan fringe, where the cost of development is even gr~--t-~. The question is not whether to address sprawl. The question is how to addreuiL In the early 1990's, the California Legislature convened a conseosos project on growth management, and in 1991 Governor Wilson formed a cabinet-level council charged with developing a plan on how the state should __duress the challenge. A gear deal of good work was done and agreement was reached in some areas. These proces___ses did nat result in legislative action, but a good foundation of under- is not meant to be a manual or a t~ctlcal "how-to" on changing development pat- terns in California- Rather, it is meant as a wake-up call to all Californians that the sprawl issue has a new urgency in the state, and that all of as can play a role in address- ing the problem. To succeed, we will have to set aside individual interests, build on the founclation that has been laid, and work for the good of the whole. We need to xldn:ss sirawl through community action, public policy, private business practices, and individual behavior. It is our intent that the ideas and examples that follow wilt be used as a betsis for fur- ther refinement and concerted action. Fiat, more certaint7 is needed in delineating where new develol~ment should and should not occur. Sprawl occurs partly because current policy constrains the real estate market by rewarding 'leapfrog" development driven on the metropolitan and subtuban fringe- The alternative is to be more explicit about conservation and development priorities, targeting actions and policies for bener integration of the two. Using this approach means utilizing land at the suburban fringe more efficient- ly and encouraging the reuse of land and other development opportunities in already developed areas. It does not mean stopping growth at the fringe, but doing it at density levels that will not promote further sprawl. To succeed, this approach needs more effective public policies encouraging such compact growth and removing barri- ' ers to iL However, the other side of certainty for developera requires commitments to conserve ecologically important habitats and other open space. Accelerating statewide planning eatforts such aS Natural i Communities Conservation Planning i (NCCP), which involves voluntary action i at the local level and requires consensus ! among development, environmental corn- ! munity and local government '.rotcrests, will enhance our ability to provide greater environmental and economic certainty regarding new development- With its emphasis on biological assessment, ecosys- tem protection and compatible economic devetopment, NCCP can provide much F. ater certainty to both those who want to develop their property and those who want to protect the natural environment- Broader use of mitigation banks can facilitate mar- ket-based compensation to landowners who choose to help protect ecologically valu- Conservation of other habitat and open space, such as prime a~icultural land, will also require us to find creative approaches like the NCCP process. The newly established California Envimnzncntal Resources Evaluation System (CERES) will help this process by expanding access Regardless of the methods used, much of the lesdership for providing greater cer- tainty for conservation and development must come faxan the state, regional agen- cics, and local governments working together. But private businesses also have a critical role. Especially in difficult ~conom- ic times, real estate developers and their lenders know that certainty of approval and availability of infrastructure, rather than speculative leapfrogging, will reduce costs estate developments can be brought to mar- kct more quickly and cheaply within ar~s vation and development have been created.~. .'. . .,.., ,,.. o/,,.n,, a,s u, .t,.,,,s, be.,, Older urban and suburban neigh- borhoods should be reinforced as good process should take place without dis- .~,;~.~. =~'~._ '~~~. BEYOND SPRAWL obsolete, unpleasant, or otherwise unac- ceptable m those who h~vc the option of le~ving- The result is a tragic neglect of th ie and capital invcstznents- bo peop rhoods must be main- et hbo Older n ' g teincd and improved so they are again desix~le places to live and work- Old Town pasadena, the South of Masher area in San Francisco, and the train depot reconsu~tc- lion in Sacramento arc all prime examples of successf~xl restoration projects- Better =' school systems, job training and access .m ~ capital for small businesses are prefectm' ! sites. '[hese efforts reqtdzc a combination of government policy initiatives,-active busi- ! · t, and sl~ecial efforts by indi- i viduals jobs is absututelY critical  ~kl~ ! Staz and governments should adopt ! land-use and transportation policies that ~ reinforce investments in older neighbor- i hoods. Incentives must be developed for : homebuyers, and job- creating businesses, othen willing to invest in old~ neighbor- n be recycl f . m g Investore can make tax credits. Wid=r use: tow income bousiag i credits or other incentives can be estab- lished for lelldilg and cq.uity investments that support small businesses and job ~ es infres~ pollution and social costs well in excess of assessed develOPment fees. Xf we rationalize development and conttol the co~ts of sprawl, it ~ flee up capital that can be reinvested into existing Older communities themselves to make their neighborhoods attractive ~ to job creating and housing investments- they need protection from frivolous envi- reomcntal and product liabilitY suits. The closing of military bases in California offers interesting potential for development. Bases have substantial potential as alternatives to building houses and job centers on the suburban fringe. While there ate problems associated with redeveloplag many bases, they also have excellent potential for showcasing how to ~esotve difficult uz~n rebuilding Third, a legal a.d proceduraZ fram~ork shouM be established ~o cr~at~ the d~sired c~rminr~ aad send the righ~ economic signals to inwestors- Four ele- ments ate neetied- (a) Where development is allowed. state and local permitting should be srreandined. This is cxitical to encotra~mg development in ufoan and otdgr subuzban azus- It may reelulre changes to legislation Co) Deve[lopmenz at the rnen'°P°lit[~a~ · · should be required to pay the · busitt. ss strace o ~ those develoP- often inexpensive ments pay for local infzastruem~, but do not pay the fult cost of constructing roadS., tonmental I'robterns' on those irabalances- lxnposiag such costs ! developments would discourage sPrawL For example, the citY of Lancss~ an innovative program that rec~uire. s new development to pay capital and operating Development fur- costs of infrastructure. while develoP- ther out pays its full cost, ment that is closer to the citY' s center pays i nuch tess' since it is fied in to existing citY Agsin, this is atsskthatrectuixesth~ Indivkhnis and communitY g~oup in those areas should redouble their efforts to active pafticipstion of both government improve the qtnlitY of ufoan life in small and business- Fer example, many govern- meut agencies, such as water suPPliers, · ~ - le, by form~g commarelY- 1 subsidize development on %~ based unity developmen i sm~ctute across ' disc~m.~ "=':' ' ': ~ '~es t in n~mtaining neightx~nood thcxis ~ petitire ~vantege ov P ~n~'o~d az~ made ~.~:.:'~~ .... ~';*=: vices ~so if de F . ~, ~ o~cr beginning--would also discourage sprawl by including the full assessment of environmen- tal cost in private real estate transactions. (c) California's local governments should encourage more efficient and coor- dinated local land-use policies. Sprawl has been encouraged by tax revenue competi- tion among local governments for some land uses. such as retail centers, and by slow-growth policies that discourage other land uses, such as housing. Development patterns that are now truly regional are being created almost completely by an accumulation of local decisions. But some local governments are beginning to show that it is possible to work together toward consistent land-use policies when given the incentive to do so. In planning for the reuse of closed military bases. for example. local governments are forming "joint powers authorities" in which many jurisdictions work together toward a common goal The vast majority of Californians choose to locate in large metropolitan axeas. But most of these people live in small. politically independent suburban jurisdictions. These local governments must work together toward a consistent set of land-use policies--such as discouraging development on the metropolitan fringe and reinforcing investments in transit systems--that will enhance economic opportunity and quality of life across the entire metropolitan area. Joint powers authorities, such as those c~ated for mill- tar,/base reuse, should be viewed as one model for cooperative planning, and others {d) Technological change should be tiled to combat sprawl rather than encourage it. In the past, technological advancements (such as automobiles and government-sponsored freeways) have sup- potted sprawl. requiring expensive afzer-the- fact government action of questionable value (such as ridesharing requirements). Today we stand at the threshold of a new teclmological era that offers the oiFrmni~ to have more work done at home and in local communities. We must take advan- rage of the oppommities presented by the information superhighway to improve our land-use patterns rather than further destroy them. For example, the information super- highway could end up encouraging a further dee=nnlin~on of jobs to the ntr,~o~olim hinge. F-tt~ of a daily commute to a large employment center, some individuals and BEYOND SPRAWL small businesses will seek to locate in dis- rant suburbs and travel back to older urban centers to do business as needed. This trend could put more pressure on land at the fringe. However, the telocommunications rev- olution can also hold the potential for reviving economically troubled areas. Because of its locational flexibility, telecommunications can provide new job. prospects for older urban neighborhoods and for rural towns. Both government poli- cy and private business practice should encourage the use of telecommunications to reinforce existing communities rather Fourth, we should forge a consti~n- q to build sustainable commtmiaes. Past efforts to reduce sprawl have been ham- perea because litde constituency exists beyond groups of government reformers, some local government leaders, community groups, and conservationisis. But, as this report suggests, many other players in California's future will also trmd them- selves increasingly stifled by sprawl. Political alliances must be forged between environmentalists, inner-city community advocates, business leaders, government experts, farmers, and suburbanires to improve the quality of life in all our exist- ing communities and protect our re. sources. This will not be an easy task. Most of these groups are focused on their specific agendas and often harbor animosity toward each other even though alliances make long-term strategic sense. But it is possible. For example, enviromnentalists concerned about devel- opment at the suburban fringe have tremendous opportunities to work with governments and community organizations seeking to im:rease investment in more central urban areas. Farmers seeking a long-term future in agriculture near an urban area can form very effective alliances with those working to protect resources. Community groups, government agencies. and builders can explore new marketing and funding options that support taking advantage of the huge demand for changing demographics. Taxpayers con- c~ued about the inefficiency of governmen- tomakebetteruseofinfrasmacnn~inexist- ing uxban areas. Tbe~are literally dozens of We must act now. The decisions we make in the next few years will determine California's future course---and its chances for succc,~. To build a strong economy and retain a good quality of life for the 21st Century, we must move beyond sprawl to a new vision of community in the few r~maining years of the 20th Century. · B of A says sprawl bad for California The bank backs aca one. court barnes state report urgin new requirements for land developers. · In a rare agreement among .'warring Interests, the Bank of America Joined with advocates of ,. open space and ioW-txmt housing .. yesterday to warn mat Californli's . runaway sprawl is bad for brad- ,. flea8, · .. The ~l~!at to the suburbs that .. fueled the state's economy for 50 .' years is now creating enormous costs, said a report by Bank of America, the Greenbelt Alliance, · . the Low Income Housing Fund and the state Resources Agency. -.. "When you talk about leap-frog- ging development that takes you out to Trncy and Modesto, those · home buyers may do all rlfht," said Richard Morrison, Bank of .Z America senior vice president of environmental policy. "B,Jt that's because other people · .- are deaiing with the expense of ah. pollution and building highway and : pay for it." . Although the groups contribut- ins to the report come from differ- ent perspectives, Morrison said, "we all agree that, if we don't deal · with urbnn sprawl, Sooner or liter California won't be such a pleasant · place to live." The report, prepared for the state Little Hoover Commimion, said counties should require devel- opers of prom on the od2e of urban arem to pay the ftdl cust of building new roeads, extem,~g .wa- ter lines and implementin2 mea- sures to protect the envtronment. · fives to pot money and resources into central cities and. older sub- uria especially where it would · create new ~ the report said. The report was born out of frustration with the l~.,2~vMl~ire's failure over the last two yesrs to deal with the Mato's burgeonin2 · population. 2iomfi plans that de~l~te .zones' for development and conmr., ~atkm. .-In ereas of devetopmant, the per- .. mlt process ,would be sinmmlined. But nothi~ lass been introduced for this leave session, said · Larry Ornum, director of Green- · belt Alliance in San Francisco, whme 2roup supports relionai .o plans. Lenders such ss Bank of Amerl- ! executive omcer of the Mato'S larSest bank, Save the report full support. RusenberS SiSnod a letter with Oman, aesuurces Secrelm~DouS Wheelel' and Doalel I~ibSOhn Of the Low Income Housing Fund warning that "unfettered sprawl wlll make the state less cornpert- five, burdan taximyers with hiSher costs, deemde the environment and lower the quall~ of life for every Caitfomina.". Amoag the $roups vlc~mlml by sprawl, according to the report: · Taxpayers. Hi2hways must be buUt and maintained to serve dis- liar suburbs. ~ problems fes- ter in abandoned older neiShbor- hoods. 'Solving environmental. problems of develogment such us air sad water poliutioa aml loss of wefiaads and e,tds,t~ved species are expensive. itY of life, California is a less desirable location for budhess owners and potential employees. Worke~ must commute ions dis- can't ~et there at all Business investments in abandoned nelSh- · Residents in new suburbs. The avera2e Californian spends $I out of e~,y 25 of income on buyinS and rp,,int~b~ their crux ManY conunuters spend an hour or more adaYonthe mad. Suburban home buyers* taxes 2o to pay off bonds tlmt sume developers use to · Residentsofcentmicitiesand older suburbs. They cannot com- mute to suburban jobs without a cm'. A8 b,~,: Ms and leave for new suburbs, older nelB!i- makin8 it mere dimcult to main- · The envtronnMnt Develop. ment sabbles up open space that protects water supp .... nm, wetmnds, forests and wildlife.. :,'~, !. ;,.. ,f , HU 'Report;Finds 'A/ninistfa~on join ~nvironn~nislists in' :; ... '. 'uniiual alllenin Authors say, the tcono.'.m~', "' de!~nd~ on smarter dgVilopit~nL',' '... ~'~., .:!:! :' By FRANK CLIFFORD! : ": ....' ' · · ~ ~ ' ~ ': TIMEl ENVIRONMENTAl, WIITE~ ' ..... ' .' "' , Per years environmenial Erou!~ h'ave '~rEuecl 1~ litiJe effect that' ~uhurhan' ~rawl hurls. ~,8li!~mt~,' ' Now. tl~e Wilson Adminislra~on and Bank: of Ere lendlnil new welEht to the Ergumenl~ makinE the ~ that the siate's eharactemu.~ Erow.t .~.~.'.bN~ . had for the environment and the economy," ....., .,"i · In a report to I~ rtleiled todil]t, In. Ilnljlu8| that infiudu such I~ni~hrles of the !~lL-Worlci WI~ II i~ulatiod boom El Bask 0f Anleflea ¢~/li~ludll Lha~ :'. future growth should aYoid .new Iprawl to' l~rol~"'.' California freE/further harm," · .' "· ' .' ""'"" ": .' "Sprawl ~ompromis~ one of. the rao~t "lan/e~l~," .~he rc,~rt sinus, "C, Elifornia' bu/ne~,~.. · ., t~lll~L' Eon!l~te'~!obsllY when the~y Ere burdened! wtl~ .' .,J; '~of.~mwL"'- .: !',, ..:' c..7, .!.'i.?:~;,:~i~..'. ,' ::., ." ~e. !t!~orL binroll the "d~ll'~/~tion"of I~ ~! thee · ~'i~,te's Itianc~ on subUnman iprawl an~! eontendl one-lhird ot all air IN:lllutlon il lzaae~ble to"'~r a/~&~/" Lt~k emlslon~ e~eerbsted by IonEar ~ommutHT' .: ~l~e~llial~l by the ErewinE dil'.lS~.e~ b~L~Nn. hem ' "and work'. ' ' ' · · . ' ' ' Yet the t'e[mrt's authorl inlillL ~rlelrl il !!eL a eEli f0.r :' ,,-. · , limitinn 'growth,' l~ther, they ~, ~L If. il ~lfll ~';'.~C~l|[ornia t0 I~ smarter about how It E~/w~.--t~ in~enL' ' :; '. wE~s we ein erelie ~ompsat and ef~fient E~.'wtlL" './; ' :;'. ;':' 'Sprlwl wEi 8floralable; the r~.l~ort'iEYs,;il'lonll the suppl), of ahesp: land w~ .sb~lndant' and '~ove~rff~ :. "'. ' ment ~Eene4~ and priYate bu/ne~es. were able ~ ': ".' rant the demEncl for alfordable hoines willie I~iY t~':... lot'the ros~, schools, water systoms,:'sewall~ In'eaCh' ': i, .ment !~lanls and gu and el~trla lin~ that each ~e1~' ':"':' development requiNd,'- ~ ' ' ' ' :~'Zt ' '. ',..,: .' i. '.. ',.- BUt within the Imlt feElration, the taper ~in~.'" ': ~..." e.lx~twsr formull for iu~ l~l l~Eome oYe~ :t~be¢~aie. morG c'onE~tecl0. the" ~s~ply of "dave oi~l~t~ · · ' "'~11~i h~ dwindl~fi, and because'. of tk~reasing 'eerie,. ;. ':. with the d~raand lot publie Nrvi~e." "' ' ' ': - ;' '. :' - ' W printed by Bank' orAmeriea, the Wilmn'Adminl~ta~! !. tion'~ Bamurc-~' Al~an~Y, the 8an" rranfi~-ba~."~", Grinbelt Alliance and. the ,nonprofif Hot~ingl~unc!: · · :.'~ Z '. '. "."'-'.. ,, " l/~a ' · ~'he intent of the Nl~ort l~ to promote 'stat~ and; ' ~". governm~t polifi¢~ ti~t will di~ourage the lasttern '~ · leaplro~ development that h~ didlanes! l~ople frolti ;:.'.:,url~n centers, while. aEEravating traf~c~ ~ongOt~ :' and air pollution. - ' · ~,. .:.. "~n t~ ~,-the armiment a~..i It [~rawi] Ix~n ~ pm~ly in enVironmenial terror': Doug~ :-i~ WhNler, t!~ mate'S. ~iary of r~muraa;.;ml ~ · . Menflay. "Unfortunately; that w~s n~t an ErEumen~l:.° :..: ' .tmpli~ation~, anti with b~inm getting involved in '.. ~, ther~ ~ a real opl~rtunlty for risEnEe-'-' ~.: ~ ,' :v · The. rel~.rt'underNor~ ,the hailer areonE "~0fiie ..... · ·- ... ,"~ '~-. .~. i[thequalityof!ifec'ontinu~tod~'-lineiandthee~to~' "tinanfing real ~tate .development ~ealate~,"., ~l~r mt~. "By Nfiueing the quality of life. ~raWl ']'-h~ mad. e~llfornii-a Im d~lrable io~atio~ .fo~' ."t f - lm~ln~ own~r~ and ix~htifi emplo:yN~." ~ .. · ...... · 'I'Ve al~eel 'of California luburl~n living. fad~l'~.: .. n~w home buyer~ feel the 'welEht of °hew L.l~L~o , '! ·ine. re~fingly n~ry t~' ~over tnfmtruetuf~ · .a~eor~tng to the rei~rt- °~rh~-addltional Iax~ olten. havG the eff~t of doubling 'a new hom~oiner*~ . ..propertylixbili,"ther~l~ortsteto. -' - , ';. ',~ ,~he r~ort ~iio~.the me long made by"firha, "'.'. that the inane economic and' ~o~a~ ..~ imlation of older fity'.-n~lghhorhood~ l~ linit~! '.~ roburban ~rawi, toying B/t it ha~ taken away.JolNa. |,ve,tment ea~lial.' Nlitleal power and' go~'~m.~en,~ " pLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JUNE 15, 1994 area next to it, would berural in nature. If desired, they could draw those parcels out of the plan, but it would be better to acknowledge that they are there and do things within the plan to respond to their concerns. Commissioner Kelley said it appeared that there was an impasse between the applicant and the Planning Department. The staff report recommends a denial, and the applicant appeared to be leaning towards a continuance. Mr. Burnell said he understood that the applicant was not convinced that there should bea general plan amendment for this area. They were trying to work on suggestions made on the plan in terms of the overall concept, and address the technical issues, such as the Board's policy on drainage. Also, they wanted to address the concerns of the people living in the area, and the issue of compatibility- They strongly believed that it was appropriate to look at the long term future of the area, and respond to the owners of the property who were in support of the kind of effort the proponents were making. They would like the Commission to comment on where they are now, and what they have done in terms of the land plan. Then, they could work on the plan, bring it back to staff, and return at a future Commission hearing~ }is. Laurence advised t~at staff's concern was that this project was premature for the area, and staff could not support a general plan amendment at this time. That concern overrides all the other details associated with this plan. She asked whether the Commission felt that this item was premature also, and therefore should not go forward. Or, does the Commission feel that this plan was appropriate~ if so, then it would be reasonable to continue this item so that the applicant could refine the plan and bring it forward. Commissioner Kelley said on November 17, 1993, when this matter first came to the P~anning Commission, there was a suggestion by staff that this matter be bifurcated. Also, that the Planning Commission express an opinion as to the GPA, whether negative or positive, so that recommendation could go to the Board. Then the · Board based on the recommendation from the Commission, could make a recommendation on the work robedone on the specific plan. This would allow the applicant to save his money, time and so forth, and would give a clear idea regarding the GPA. At that time, she indicated her support of Planning staff's recommendation that this was a premature project. The applicant has not presented anything to change her position since that November 17th hearing. If the applicant wishes to proceed, he does so with his "eyes wide open." The question before the Commission was whether the Commission was comfortable with the GPA, as she waspersonally not comfortable for the reasons she expressed on November 17th. General Plans and Community Plans are used as tools to quide future development, and they must be flexible enough and strong enough to serve their 4O pLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JUNE 15, 1994 purpose. There have been discussions in and about the community and, in her mind, mere approval of projects in that area does not carry the same weight as development. The general plan, along with guiding valuable development, also has to protect established rural communities- The general plan that relies on approved projects that have not been built does not have sufficient weight to go forward. Circumstances have not changed sufficiently in that area to merit a general plan amendment at this time. Commissioner Kelley said the specific plans in that area are that does not yet exist. Currently, there are no exist g in the French Valley/Lake Skinner area. If they rely on paper cities, then they will be building on a "house of cards," which neither reasonable nor productive. Commissioner Kelley said Mr. Birdsall made a comment regarding something she has always been concerned with, and that was piecemeal development. If they approve a specific plan, they allow phasing, which means not all infrastructure is built at the front end. What that does is piecemeal an area. They have a specific plan with urban intent, and people move into the area expecting urban services. Ofteh the area is so far removed from the core of existing services that it puts a great burden on the County system to serve those residents. That creates great frustration for newcomers and for those already living in the County, who have to accept diluted services. In summary, she agreed with staff that this project was premature. Commissioner Kelley said in all fairness to the proponent and applicant, she believed that it would be far better to accept the recommendation of the Planning staff to deny the project and send it on to the Board. If the Board chooses, they can approve the CGPA, send the project back for further work and analysis, or they can also deny the CGPA. · Commissioner Roth agreed with Commissioner Kelley. He was interested in' planning bayond where they were today, and talked to the Planning Director about advance planning, which needs to be done. In fairness to the people who bought into this area believing that they w~uld have a large lot development, there should be some period of time where they could rely on that. Essentially what the CGPA is attempting to do is move the boundary of the SWAP out, or change the designations, which he felt was inappropriate and premature. He would like to see more advance planning, and consistency with a map that informs people about what can or cannot be done. He believed that Commissioner Kelley hit the essence of the concerns. Mr. Burnell said at this point he understood how the Commissioners 41 pLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JUNE 15, 1994 felt and ~heir concerns about the project. He saw no value in bifurcating the project because he would prefer that the entire project be denied and sent on to the Board. He said SWAP did say something about this area, but then the City of Temecula came into being and general planned that area differently, which was what they were responding to. Agriculture cannot go on much longer in this area. The hearing was closed at 2:31 p.m. MOTION: Upon motion by Commissioner Kelley, seconded by Commissioner Roth and duly carried (Commissioner Canady was absent), the Commission recommended tentative denial of Specific Plan No. 286, Comprehensive General plan Amendment No. 306, Change of Zone 5932, and further recommended that the Board not grant the cancellation of the agricultural preserve contract based on discussions by Commissioners Kelley and Roth- coue~cial, Z0 es o~ pa:ks; one 10-acre school site, 27.3 ac~es ~ e Y 274 ? ac~es ~ UEST: Change ~e n Space and Consedation Map designation City~enifee Val y . . . Hearing was o~n~ at 2:41 p.m. and w continued to 2:00 p.m. on August 10, 1994, - Staff said~is item hasten continued a n r of times in order to resoZve a n,,~r of issues, s~cifically h regard to flood control concerns, parks, sch~ls, fiscal iapac~ a lysis, a ~raffic study, ~e ~atcatcher and ~e SP zoning text,n~r of ~e concerns havens resolved, withes only outstandin issue ~ing ~e traffic and ~atca~cher studies- Since ~e wri~ g of the staff re~rt, s~ff received a completed~a~ca~cher surv froa a biol~is~ certified by the S~ate, and it has ~en determin tha~ ~ere ~e no gnatcatchers on the site, The traffic study has yet~en cleared byte Trans~rta ' , ' ' 42 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JUNE 15, 1994 The time being12:21 p.m., the Commission recessed for lunch, after which the meeting reconvened with all Commissioners previously seated noted present. Commissioner Canady was absent. (AGENDA ITEM 5.1 - Tapes 2B, 3A) SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 286 - EIR 374 - Winchester 1800 Landowners - French Valley and Skinner Lake Areas - Third Supervisorial District 1,450.1~ east of Pourroy Rd and Winchester Rd, south of Keller RdTc~%~ of Washington St and north of Auld Rd, with an additional'160 acres south of Thompson Rd, west of Pourroy Rd, and north of Benton Rd - PROJECT: A Planned Mixed-use Development comprised of 5,806 dwelling units on 1,450.1 acres, with densities ranging from 0.35 to 15.0 dwelling units per acres~ 94.2 acres of commercial, 10.9 acres of medical office/facilities~ 44.0 acres of parks~ four school sites totalling 52 acres~ 135.9 acres of open space~ and 123 acres devoted to roads with CHANGE OF ZONE 5932 - From R-R-2~, A-1-5, R-A-2~, A-1-2~, R-T-2~ and A-1-15 to SP and GENERAL PLANAMEND)~EWTNO- 306 - REQUEST: Amend the Open Space and Conservation Map designation from "Areas Not Designated as Open Space" and "Agriculture" to "Specific Plan No. 286"= to amend the Southwest Area Community Plan Land Use Allocation Map from -Residential with 2~ acre minimum lot sizes" "Residential, with 2 to 4 dwelYing units per acre," and -AgriCulture" to "Specific Plan No 286"' and to amend the Land Use and Circulation Elements of the' General ~lan and AGRICULTURAL PRESERVE CASE NO. 737 (ContractCancellations and Diminishment of Winchester Agricultural Preserve No. 5) - Coscan/Steward partnership - French ValleyArea - Third Supervisor.~al D.~str.ict {Cont. from ~/~3/94~ (RJM} Hearing was opened at 1:34 p.m. and was closed at 2:31 p.m. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Denial of Specific Plan No. 286, Comprehensive General Plan Amendment No. 306 and Change of Zone · 5932, based on the findings and conclusions listed in the staff report. Staff noted that Agricultural Preserve No. 737 was before the Board. Mr. MacHott said at the February 23rd meeting, staff spelled out a number of concerns, beth with the project design and consistency with the General Plan. Subsequent to the last hearing, staff has received nothing from the applicant with regard to a redesign of the project. Staff evaluated the project based on the SWAP policies and the General Plan. Unless the applicant redesigned the project to be consistent with the rural designation of SWAP for that property located on the east side of Pourroy, staff could not support the project. 33 ITEM 22 TO,' FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROV CITY ATTORNI~~ FINANCE OFFIC CITY MANAGE CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning~'~Tr March 28, 1995 Status Report on Klassic Shotz Billiards, Planning Application No. PA94-0043 Prepared By: Craig D. Ruiz, Assistant Planner RECOMMENDATION: Receive and File BACKGROUND On August 23, 1994, the City Council approved a conditional use permit for the Klassic Shotz Billiards. In approving the project, the Council instructed staff to come back with a status report regarding complaints at the site within six months of the approval. To date, staff has received one letter of complaint from Ester Downer, owner of the Q club billiards parlor (See Attachment No. 1 ). In her letter, Ms. Downer expressed concern that the condition of approval requiring minors to vacate the premises by 10:00 p.m. was not being enforced. As stated in staff's reply, the City had not received any complaints regarding Klassic Shotz (See Attachment No. 1 ). Staff also stated that if Ms. Downer wished to file a formal complaint, the Code Enforcement Officer would then investigate. To date, no formal complaints have been received from Ms. Downer. The Police Department, to date, has received one service call to this location (See Attachment No. 2). The service was for an audible alarm. Attachments: Letter of Complaint and Staff Response - Page 2 Temecula Police Department Service Memo - Page 3 Applicant's Letter - Page 4 R:\STAFFRPTV,3PA~r,-1.CC :~/20/95 ktb 1 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 LETTER OF COMPLAINT AND STAFF RESPONSE R:\STAFFRPT\~3PA9~-I.CC 3/20/95 ktb 2 November 10, 1994 Mr. S. Munoz, Councilman City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Dr. Temecula, CA 92590 PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL Mr. MUnoz, When the City issues a "Conditional Use Permit" with conditions such as Klassic Shotz Billiards: "Np Alcohol Beverage" and "No one under 18 years old after 10PM" how does the City ensure that their conditions are being upheld? For example, if you go to Klassic Shotz Billiards, you would not know no one under 18 is not allowed after 10PM. It is not on all the doors, posted inside or announced nightly. Should it not be prominently posted on all entry doors? The police say they do not enforce or check on the cities restrictions on "use permits." Shouldn't they? Also I read in THE CALIFORNIA}] (copy enclosed) that they "had no intention of ever attempting to sell alcohol." However, a few days ago two police personnel visited my business to make a comparison as Klassic Shotz Billiards was going to re-apply to sell alcohol. I guess ever must be 2 months. That's about ho~ long they have been open. You know the City Planning Dept. must complete a form for the Alcohol Beverage ConTrol as part of an applicant application package. Maybe the Temecula Planning Dept. should be advised of the restriction on this business at this location. Mrs. Smedley's representative, who gave the assurances at the City Council meeting, Mr. Ken Wade, is the brother of Mr. Bruce Wade owner of High Society Billiards. The Wades previously operated Family Billiards of Ramona, CA, and Family Billiards of Lake Elsinore, CA. It would be of interest to check the police reports on these two operations. Respectfully, Esther A. Down 27911 Front St. #104 Temecula, CA 92590 "4 i Cityo'fTemecula; ,.'.'t..,. 4-3174 Business Park Drive · Temecula. California 92590 19o9l 69~1989 - FAX (9o~l December 19, 1994 Esther A. Downer Q Club 279 11 Front Street//104 Temecula, CA 92590 Subject: Klassic Shotz B{lliard~/~A~4-0043 At the request of Councilmember Mufioz, I would like to reply to your leiler dated November 10, 1994. First, with regards to the enforcement of conditions of approval for the above referenced project, the City's Code Enforcement Officer is responsible for enforcing violations of conditions. However, the Code Enforcement Office operates on a complaint basis. To date, no complaints have been filed against this project. Second, as you correctly suu~ in your let~r, the approval of Klassic Shotz did not allow the selling of alcohol. If the owner of Klassic Shotz wants to sell alcohol, she would need to file an application with the City for an amendment to their Conditional Use Permit (CLIP). The City does not have the ability to prohibk the filing of such an application. However, if such an application were filed, the City Council would have the authority to approve or deny the amendment. Third, the Plmnning Department is aware of the no alcohol provisions of the CUP. If Klassic Shotz were to apply for an alcohol selling license with the Deparunent of Alcohol Beverage Control (ABC), the applicant would be required to supply the following information: 1) Requirement for a CUP to sell alcohol, 2) The date the CUP was approved, and 3) Name of person contacted with the City. Then, as pan of the ABC review process, the City contact person is contacted to verify the information. The Plmn-lng Depa~uuent feels that this process provides for adequate safeguards for anyone trying to circumvent the CUP process. I hope this letter run,wets any questions you may have regarding the Klassic Shotz project. ~hould you have any questions concerning the above information, please contact Craig Ruiz of the Deparunent at (909) 694-6400. Sincerely, '" / Gary Thornhill Director of pIarmi. E cc: City Manager/City Council R:~PLANN~G~HOT'/,LTI 12;19/9~ ~ ! l~rznlecl on Recyclecl Pa~er. ATTACHMENT NO. 2 TEMECULA POLICE DEPARTMENT SERVICE MEMO R:\STAFFRPT\~3PAWe-I.CC 3120195 ktb 3 Thursday Hatch 16, 1995~3:16;m -- From ,71/,69/,A567' -- Page 2A City of Temecula Temecula Police Department March 16, 1995 Calls for Service Kisssic Shotz Batlards For the calendar year 1994, them was one call for service at 41915 Motor Car Parkway. That carl was an audible alarm. In 1995, year to date. there have been no cab for service generated froe this address. This address, Includes suites A, B and C, commonlY known as K!assic Shotz Billiards. Police Officer Temecula Police Department (909) 696-3000 ATTACHMENT NO. 3 APPLICANT'S LETTER R:\STAFFRPT\&~PA94.-1.CC 3120195 kLb 4 Development Cormultant~ March 15, 1995 Gary Thornhill, Planning Director City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 Subject: Klassic Shotz Billiards City Council Six Months Status Review March 28, 1995 #663 ECEIVEU CITY OF TEMECULA Dear Gary: I would like to confirm that the Klassic Shotz review is on agenda for March 28, 1995 and that included with that request is consideration of the deletion of the requirement in the resolution not be permitted to apply for an alcohol license. The intention of Klassic Shotz is to apply for a beer consumption license with the provision that NO ONE ONDER 21 YEARS OF AGE be permitted in the establishment regardless of hours of operation. This should allay the concerns of the opponents at the public hearing that were concerned about the combination of alcohol sales taking place in the presence of minors under the age of 18. Klassic Shotz has established a beautiful state of the art facility, as can be evidenced by an inspection, which we would encourage staff to conduct. They have established a fine reputation with no problems to date. Please make sure that this request is included in the Staff Report for the 28th. Sincerely, MARKHAM & ASSOCIATES Lar~/R. Markham Principal ] LRM/jag cc: Ken Wade c: \wpdocs\Joyce\klassic. 663 41750 Winchester Road, Suite N · Temecula, California 92590 · (909) 676-6672 · FAX (909) 699-1848 ITEM 23 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney March 28, 1995 Consideration of Adoption of Resolution Approving a Master Property Tax Exchange Agreement Between the City of Temecula and the County of Riverside Upon Annexations of Territory to the City RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a Resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 95- 'A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE MASTER PROPERTY TAX TRANSFER AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE UPON ANNEXATIONS OF TERRITORY TO THE CITY' BACKGROUND: Pulte Homes Corporation has submitted to the Local Agency Formation Commission a request for annexation of certain territory to the City of Temecula. Pulte proposes to annex a part of the "Silverhawk" project to the City. Under the provisions of California Revenue and Taxation Code Section 99, the City and County must agree upon a transfer of real property tax in order for annexations to be effective. The City and County may do so on a project-by-project basis, or may enter into a Master Real Property Tax Transfer Agreement in order to avoid negotiating property tax exchange for each project. Because Revenue and Taxation Code Section 99 only allows a 30-day period to conclude the negotiations on property tax exchange or the annexation is terminated, a master property tax exchange agreement has its merits. Pulte has requested that the City adopt the Master Property Tax Transfer Agreement. ORANGE:31T2.1 The Agreement generally provides that when the City of Temecula assumes the service responsibilities for fire service in the territory to be annexed, that the City would receive 100% of the property tax revenue allocated for fire protection. The Agreement also provides that when the City assumes service responsibility for the provision of library services for the areas that are annexed, the City would receive 100% of the property tax revenue generated and collected by the County for the provision of library services. As to the balance of "general municipal services," the Agreement also provides that the City would receive 25% of the property tax revenue from the area subject to the annexation of that portion of property tax revenue which is currently dedicated to the provision of County services, Puite represents to the City that this is a "standard" property tax exchange agreement between cities and counties in Riverside County for the transfer of property taxes, Furthermore, Pulte's representatives have stated to the City that the County would be willing to execute such an Agreement, : In the event, future annexations appear to have a financial cost associated with them which would make them a financial burden to the City, the City may repeal this Resolution and negotiate a property tax exchange agreement on a project-by-project basis. In the event the future annexations are financially favorable to the City, adoption of this Agreement allows the annexation process to be streamlined. FISCAL IMPACT: The proposed property tax allocation is the same as the existing property tax structure within the City limits. ATTACHMENTS: A Resolution approving the Master Property Tax Transfer Agreement. ORANOE:3172.1 The Agreement generally provides that when the City of Temecula assumes the service responsibilities for fire services in the territory to be annexed, that the City would receive 100% of the property tax revenue allocated for fire protection, The Agreement also provides that when the City assumes service responsibility for the provision of library services for the areas that are annexed, the City would receive 100% of the property tax revenue generated and collected by the County for the provision of library services. As to the balance of "general municipal services," the Agreement also provides that the City would receive 25% of the property tax revenue from the area subject to the annexation of that portion of property tax revenue which is currently dedicated to the provision of County services. Pulte represents to the City that this is a "standard" property tax exchange agreement between cities and counties in Riverside County for the transfer of property taxes. Furthermore, Pulte's representatives have stated to the City that the -County would be willing to execute such an Agreement. In the event, future annexations appear to have 8 financial cost associated with them which would make them a financial burden to the City, the City may repeal this Resolution and negotiate a property tax exchange agreement on a project-by-project basis. in the event the future annexations are financially favorable to the City, adoption of this Agreement allows the annexation process to be streamlined. FISCAL IMPACT: City of Temecula share of the County General Fund is 25% which equal to 4.075% of the Property Tax. City of Temecula share of the Fire Protection is 100% which is equal to 6,705% of the Property Tax. Fiscal impacts of individual projects to be annexed to the City will be evaluated on a case by case basis. ATTACHMENTS: A Resolution approving the Master Property Tax Transfer Agreement. ORANGE: 3172.1 -2- RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THF~ CITY OF ~, C~,IJFORNIA, APPROVING ~ MASTER PROPERTY TAX TRANSFER AGI~IENT B~,-~'wb:~2~T THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE UPON ANNEXATIONS OF TERRITORY TO THE CITY WH~'URA~, the County of Riverside and the City of Temecula are the agencies whose public services would be affected by any annexation to the City of Temecula; and, WvH~EAS, ~tatives of the County and the City have met and negotiated an exchange for property tax revenue to become effective for areas annexed to the City begjnnlng July 1, 1995; and, Wln~E~S, this exchange for propcaty tax revenue is in the best interest of the citizens of the City of Temecula; and, W!~EAS, Section '99(d) of the C,~!ifornia Revenue and Taxation Code now provides for adoption of a master property tax transfer agreement, which agreement may be: revised from time to time by the parties; and, WHEREAS, the adoption of such an agreement would contribute to a reduction in paperwork and to an increase in efficiency; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Temecula desires to enter into a master property tax transfer agreement with the County of Riverside. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEM~CULA DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. When the City of Temecula assumes the sePtice responsibilities for the suppression and prevention of structural fires in annexed areas, for such assumption of services the City shall receive 100% of that portion of the property tax revenue generated within the territory annexed and collected by the County of Riverside as a structural fire protection tax. Section 2. When the City of Temecula assumes the service responsibility for the provision of library services to annexed areas, for such service assumption the City shall receive 100% of that portion of the property tax revenue generated within the territory annexed and collected by the County of Riverside for provision of library services. ORAN~E:27~5.1 Section 3. The City of Temecula shall assume the respon~ility for providing all other general municipal services to areas to be annexed, and for such service ~,,mption the City shah receive 259~ of that portion of the Fropet ty tax revenue generated within the territory to be annexed under the ad valorera tax rate established by Article ~rt& of the Constitution of the State of California that represents the County of Riverside's share of such property tax revenue. Section 4. The County Auditor is hereby requested to convert the above established percentage figures into actual dollars, and thereaftn' to allocate such property tax revenue in accordance with the provisions of Section 95 et see. of the California Revenue and Taxation Code. Section 5. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby agrees to the exchange of property tax revenue set forth above and approves this master property tax agreement with the County. Section 6. The City Clerk shall transmit a certified copy of this Resolution to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, to the Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission, and to the Riverside County Auditor pursuant to California Revenue and Taxation Code Section 99. APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this day of ,1995. Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk ORA~GE:27JJ.1 2 STATE OF CALf!:ORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) crrY oF Tmd~'~JLA) SS I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, IIRRPRy DO CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. __ was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temec-is on the day of 199_ by the following roll call vote. CO~CILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCR/~-MBERS: COUNCH~MEMBERS: June S. Greek, City Clerk ORANGE:273S.I 3 ITEM 24 APPROVAl CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Council Mary Jane McLarney, Assistant City Manager March 28, 1995 Consideration of a Contract with DMG to Analyze Water and Sewer Impact Fees RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council consider amending the contract with David M. Griffith and Associates (DMG) to conduct a Water and Sewer Impact Fee Review. BACKGROUND: On February 28, 1995, the City Council approved a contract with DMG to perform a user fee study and to calculate development impact fees for the City. During this meeting, the City Council expressed an interest in reviewing water and sewer fees for reasonableness. DMG has proposed to perform a general review of both water and sewer fees in order to assess whether the fees have been based on reasonable assumption and methods, and that the overall fee amounts are justified. The proposed analysis fee is not to exceed $10,000. FISCAL IMPACT: If the City Council wishes to proceed with this analysis, a budget transfer of ~10,000 will be required from the General Fund Unappropriated Fund Balance to account ~q301-140-999-5248. ATTACHMENT: Water and Sewer Impact Fee Review R:'~AJdn~n,4,~TAI~!3,MIS ~ dm¸q DAVID M. GRIFFITH AND ASSOCIATES, LTD. RECEIVED MAR 13 1995 March 10, 1~5 Mr. Grant Yates Human Resources Administrator City of T emecula 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, Califomia 92590 .~UMm~i HE. SOURCES RE: Water and Sewer Impact Fee Review Dear Mr. Yates: On February 28, 1995, the City Council approved a contract between the City and David M. Griffith & Associates (DMG) to perform a user fee study and to calculate development impact fees for the City. During its deliberations, the City Council expressed interest in examining the school impact fees to determine whether they are reasonable and appropriately calculated. DMG was asked to perform this review, and we have agree to perform these additional services. We recently learned that at least one Council member is also interested in reviewing the water and sewer impact fees imposed by Rancho California Water District (RCWD) and Eastern Municipal Water District (ElVlWD). Earlier this week, you requested that we submit a proposal and cost estimate to perform such a review. We are pleased to offer this assistance, and have staff who specialize in water and sewer utility rates and fees. It is our understanding that RCWD provides most of the water and some of the sewer services within the City, and that EMWD provides some water and most of the sewer services. Since water and sewer services are each provided by the two separate entities, four separate reviews are required (in fact, it may be more like two separate reviews since the methodology and assumptions used by each District for their water and sewer fees may be basically the same). The analyses required for water and sewer impact fees is often more complex that other impact fee facility types. This is caused by a variety of types of facilities and the potential to have different methods for allocating costs to types of development. For example, water supply and treatment costs may be based on average demand or sewer flows, while water distribution costs consider peak demand and fire flow requirements. We do not believe that the City is looking for a rigorous analysis of the water and sewer impact fees, but rather a general review to assess whether the fees have been based on reasonable assumptions and methods, and that the overall fee amounts are justifiable. If significant problems are identified, these would be brought to the attention of the City for their consideration and action. California Office: 5715 Marconi Ave., Suite A · Carmichael, CA 95608 , (916) 485-8102 Mr. Grant Yates Human Reso~ Administrator March 10, 1995 Page 2 In performing the review of the water and sewer impact fees we propose to perform the following tasks: Obtain copies of each Distriet's water and sewer impact fee study reports and other supporting documentation, including fee schedules, resolutions, eapi_tal improvement plans, etc. (we should note that impact fee calculations ate not always well documented). ff necessary, meet with representatives of each District to seek clarification or improve our understanding of their fees and calculation methodology. Such meetings would only occur following consultation with City staff. Review the impact fee calculation methodology and unde~ying assumptions for reasonableness. Compare base assumptions for growth and development, infrastructure requirements, and unit demands with information from the City regarding the rate, timing, and type of new development. Prepare a summary report documenting our findings and conclusions regarding each Dist~et's water and sewer impact fees. We will meet with City staff to discuss our findings, and will be available to present the results to the City Council as well. We are aware that EMWD is currently in the process of updating their water and sewer impact fees. In addition, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD) is implementing a New Demand Charge on its member agencies (including EMWD) which could be included in impact fees imposed by each member agency. We do not know how EMWD might be planning to implement the New Demand Charge, but this is certainly an issue which is being considered as part of their update. Because of these changes, the timing may be right for the City to review the water and sewer impact fees. This could offer an opportunity to participate in the Districts' decisions regarding changes which may be forthcoming. The consultant who will perform the review of the water and sewer impact fees is Bob Reed. Bob is a Project Manager in our utility consulting practice. He is a licensed engineer and has performed numerous utility rate and fee studies. He is also familiar with MWD's new rates and charges, and how they might be included in water impact fees. A copy of Bob's resume is attached to this letter for your review. The review of water and sewer impact fees for two different Districts will be somewhat more involved than the review of school impact fees. Nevertheless, we feel confident that we could perform the review for a total cost not to exceed $10,000. (Aftern an initial review of the school impact fee report, Joe Colgan believes that that review will actually be less than the $10,000 originally estimated.) This amount would include 2 to 3 trips to Temecula (which may be combined with other activities in the area). Bob Reed's hourly billing rate is $110 per hour, and we would bill the City for actual time and expenses up to the $10,000 limit. We estimate that the review of the water and sewer impact fees could be completed within a month of receiving documentation from each of the Districts. Mr. Grant Yates Human Resources Administrator March 10, 1995 Page 3 If you have any questions regarding this proposal to review the water and sewer impact fees of RCWD and EMWD on behalf of the City, please call either Bob Reed or myself at (916) 485-8102. We appreciate the opportunity to be of further assistance to the City. Richard Pearl Vice President ROBERT U. REED, P.E. PROJECT MANAGER Mr. Reed is a Project Manager in our i,mpaet fee and utility consulting practice in the West Region. He is a registered civil engineer in the State of California and has over 11 years of experience as civil engineer and as a consultant to state and local g.ovcmmcnt. lVlr. Reed has experience in water resource management, planning, ccononuc and financial analyses, capital facility planning, budgeting, rate and fee studies, operational and organiT~rional studies, and litigation support. Mr. Reed received his Bachelor of Science degree in engineering from the University of California, Los Angeles. He also holds a Master of Science degree in Water Resource Engineering and a Master of Business Adminislration degree in Public Policy and Management from the University of California, Davis. He also worked as an Associate Engineer in resources planning for a major public utility. The combination of technical and financial experience provide Mr. Reed with a perspective well suited for understanding and addressing the needs of governmental clients. Mr. Reed's prior experience inclu. des: Currently assisting the City of Oceanside (populations 153,000) in the development of new water and sewer rates and connection fees. We arc assisting City staff in working with a sub-committee of the Utilities Commission and appointed citizens in the conduct of this study. Mr. Reed is assiting the City in determining how the new water rates and charges imposed by the Metropolitan Water District (and passed-through by the San Diego County Water Authority) will be incorporated in the City's rates and fees. Assisted the East Bay Municipal Utility District (California) in reviewing the legal, technical, financial, and administrative aspects of the System Capacity Charge. This fee has been in place for 10 years and DMG is providing technical advice on the overall SCC program. Key issues include the allocation of future water supply costs, demand characteristics in various sub-regions of the District, inclusion of financing costs, and accounting requirements. Currently providing litigation support and expert witness services to one of Northern California's largest water districts. The District provides wholesale and retail water service to about 500,000 customers. The Disu'ict's Facilities Reserve Charge is applicable at both the wholesale and retail levels. We are reviewing the methodology employed by the District in developing these fees. Currently Project Manager to the City of Del Mar to perform a comprehensive water and sewer rate and connection fee study. Seven City Council workshops and presentations have been conducted during this study to define policy objectives, to review rate structure options, and to review financial policies. New conservation- oriented rate structures have been adopted by the City. Connection fees were developed based on a buy-in methodology since the City is largely built-out, and no system expansion is planned. Project Manager performing a water rate and connection fee study for the Santa Margarita Water District. This study addressed issues associated with equity in the water rate structures (including reclaimed water pricing) and is complicated by the existence of eight improvement districts, each with their own capital facility financing structures involving property assessments. Recommendations unanimously accepted by the Board of Directors improve the conservation incentives of the rates and improve rate equity. Presentations were made during public hearings to explain rate recommendations. Assisted the City of San Jose in analyzing its existing water rates and capital improvement project financing. Development impact fees developed in this study were designed to assist the City in complying with statutory impact fee requirements in California (AB 1600). The project included development of alternative approaches to formulate an impact fee system, development of cost allocation methods for assigning capital costs to new and existing customers, a cost-of-service analysis, recommendations on specific pricing methedologies, and preparation of an impact fee schedule and water rate structure. Project Manager on a follow-on engagement with the City of San Jose to assist in the implementation of the City's Major Water ,Facilities Fees (impact fees). During this engagement Mr. Reed assisted the City in drafting an ordinance and resolution for the new fees, reviewed existing procedures to accept and process applications for new water service, and reviewed the coordination between Major Water Facilities Fees revenues and capital expenditure plans. Consultant on a recent study for the City of San C!emente. The study included development of new water, sewer, and reclaimed water rates and connection (impact) fees. DMG teamed with The Keese Company and Fieldman Rolapp & Associates on this study since the City anticipates a need to sell revenue bonds to finance future water and sewer capital improvements. Recently managed a water and sewer rate and impact fee study for the City d Lathtop. This study focused on ways for the City to finance major water and sewer system expansions to accommodate future growth, and the impacts of obtaining an additional source of water supply. Mr. Reed is currently managing an update of the water capital facilities fees to reflect changes in the City's Water Master Plan. Mr. Reed was the lead consultant for the Mayor's Blue Ribbon Committee on Water Rates for the City of Los Angeles. During this study we worked with the Department of Water and Power in the development of an innovative water rate and fee structure based on marginal cost principles. The new water' rates are intended to encourage water conservation, maintain equity between customer classes, and assure that the Department will have sufficient revenues during future water supply shortages. The study required a detailed analysis of DWP's capital program budget. Project Manager to assist the Seattle Water Department in preparing a biennial water rate study. This project addressed issues of cost allocations between wholesale and retail customers, cost allocation among retail customer classes, and the rate structure for retail customers. The Water Department employs the marginal cost of water as a basis for designing their water rates, and DMG is reviewing the marginal cost calculations. He also assisted the Water Department in organizing and managing a citizen rate advisory committee which participated in the rate study. Project Manager for a comprehensive water rate study for the Marin Municipal Water District which resulted in an innovative approach to water rates using marginal cost pricing. The engagement also included a district management audit. Mr. Reed performed a review of Engineering functions, including water supply and capital facilities planning and cost sharing between new and existing development. Project Manager on a study to assist the City of Atlanta, Georgia to develop an impact fee accounting system. The system will track impact fees for transportation, parks and recreation, police, and fire/EMS facilities. Future expansion of the system will allow it to also track impact fees for water, sewer, and storm water facilities. Assisted in the development of an impact fee program for Cherokee County, Georgia, Impact fees were calculated for fire/EMS, parks and recreation, libraries, jail facilities, and roads. Involved in a water and sewer impact fee study for the Cherokee County Water & Sewerage Authority in Georgia in compliance with that state's new impact fee legislation. Assisted the City of Scotts Valley in updating and revising its wastewater rates and rate structure. Mr. Reed is currently assisting the City of Gait in a water and sewer rate study. He also performed a review of the costs and revenues of the City of Caiistoga's water and sewer rates and capital facility charges, and made recommendations for changes. Mr. Reed was formerly a utility consulting manager with Ernst & Young. He has also conducted economic research on water conservation, pricing policies, water rationing, drought management, and water supply pining. His research focused on economic efficiency and equity in the distribution of limited water resources within urban water districts. Research culminated in masters thesis. ITEM 25 ITEM 26 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: ApI~OVAI ' CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer March 28, 1995 Overland Drive Overcrossing - Status Report RECOMMENDATION: The City Council review this status report, discuss and provide direction to staff as appropriate. BACKGROUND: The purpose of this report is to update the City Council on the progress of subject project. Following is the status of various activities: A. Engineering Design and Specifications 1. Project Study Report Completed Approved 2. Project Report Completed Approved 3. Plans for Street Improvements Completed Submitted for Review 4. Plans for Structure Completed Submitted for Review 5. Specifications Completed Submitted for Review It should be noted that Caltrans Structures Division requested additional soil borings to verify the adequacy of design based on the originally submitted borings. Engineering Cost (total per contract) Engineering Cost to Date Balance per Contract $ 761,000 744,000 $ 17,000 Southern California Edison (SCE) - Facility Relocation In conjunction with this project proposal, relocation of SCE facilities will be required. There are three (3) SCE lines crossing I-15 in the vicinity of the Overland Drive Overcrossing. These include, 12 KVA, 33 KVA and 115 KVA. Provisions have been made for placing the 12 and 33 KVA in the conduit in the bridge structure. -1- ~ltl~t~95~2g~.4-,,~ up~/ajp The 115 KVA requires overhead relocations. The exact location of the re-rOuting of the 115 KVA has not been determined. However, general routing has been proposed and appears acceptable to all concerned. The SCE issues include the following: e Will the Environmental Assessment completed by the City, which addressed all the utilities, be adequate for PUC to authorize the relocation to proceed· The exact location and the right-of-way costs associated with this project. Deign costs for the relocation. Construction costs for relocating the facility. A very preliminary costs estimate for the relocation is as follows: 2. 3. 4. Preliminary Design Right-of-Way Costs Final Design Construction Preliminary Cost Estimate Contingency + 20% Estimated Cost 20,000 60,000 60,000 500.000 640,000 128.000 768,000 It should also be recognized that, based on discussion with' SCE, that pole delivery is estimated to take 18 months from the date of order. Other Right-Of-Way The City has obtained the right-of-way from Coop on the southerly side of the proposed structure· The northerly portion of right-of-way required is owned by Mrs. Hill. Our City Attorney has been negotiating with Mrs. Hill's representatives, and advised that the required right-of-way could be obtained from the property owner for less than $200,000. Negotiations are continuing. FISCAL IMPACT: None ITEM 27 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer March 28, 1995 Street Maintenance and/or Construction of Unpaved Streets RECOMMENDATION: That City Council review the alternatives presented and provide direction to staff. BACKGROUND: City Council at their meeting of March 14, 1995 directed staff to prepare a report addressing the issue of maintenance of unpaved streets. There is approximately 3.31 miles of unpaved streets. The listing of these streets and the appropriate mileage for each is listed in the attached Exhibit "A". By previous action, City Council authorized grading of certain streets after heavy rains to provide access to property. The streets included in that action were: Santiago Road (0.36 miles), John Warner Road (0.46 miles), Liefer Road (0.86 miles) and Walcott Lane (0.53 miles). The total length of these four (4) streets is approximately 2.21 miles. The remaining unpaved streets on Exhibit "A" is approximately 2.1 miles. From our past experience, the work that has been performed on the streets, the cost of grading the 2.21 miles of the four (4) streets is approximately $1 ,200 after each rain. Based on that experience it would be fair to estimate the additional cost of $1,200 for grading the remaining unpaved streets. During the storms since January of this year, the authorized streetsfor grading as stated above were re-graded seven (7) times at a cost of $1,200 each time, for a total cost of $8,400. For that same period the additional cost for clearing and grading the balance of the unpaved roadway would be an additional $1,200 per grading or $8,400 ($16,800 total of both). The alternative would be to pave a minimum of two (2) lanes, each twelve (12) feet wide to the City standard. The estimated cost for the paving, base material, drainage structures and incidental work is approximately $1.75 million for construction with an additional costs for contingencies and incidentals in the amount of $0.75 million for a total cost of $2.5 million. -1- r:.~hlst~eS~32S~joesmia.zpUs) The financing mechen'mm eveliable to the property owners for such improvements are: 1. Pay cash for the improvements prior to award of contract. 2, Assessment District - with 1913 Act proceedings and 1915 Bond Act financing. Recently, these alternatives were explored by the residents along Liefer Road. Staff met with the property owners, explained the proceedings for Assessment District. Subsequently staff corresponded with all the owners, requesting that they sign a petition to form the Assessment District. The response was quite unfavorable. Of the 57 owners, only 12 responded. Of the 12 respondere eight (8) were in favor and four (4) against the formation of an Assessment District. No response indicates that there was no interest in forming the Assessment District. '. Property owners representing less than 20% of the area responded. Of those responding, 12% was in favor and 8% was against the Assessment District formation. For FY 1994-95,the City Council decided not to fund permanent road improvements through Service Level R because of the potential that CSD law could be revised to allow a majority protest provision within the law. This would mean that potentially, if property owners within Service Level R were able to muster a majority protest, the rate and charge for that particular year could be disapproved, end the City Council would have no recourse to recoup the construction costs, which were proposed to be funded from the City's General Fund Reserve. Therefore, the City Council directed staff to assist any property owners who desired in the formation of an Assessment District to fund necessary road improvements. As a result, property owners adjacent to Liefer Road submitted a request to the City to assist in the formation of an Assessment District to construct street and drainage improvements to Liefer Road. FISCAL IMPACT: Undetermined, depending on City Council direction and the future weather conditions annually. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Exhibit "A" LOL1TA ROAD ORMSBY ROAD (dirt) SANTIAGO ROAD JOHN WARNER ROAD LIE ROAD GATLIN ROAD ~OOD LANE PALA VISTA DRIVE CALLE CHAPOS CALLE SARAGOZA CAN~ ROAD WALCOTT LANE CALLE GIRASOL LOCATION APPROXIMATE TOTAL MILES MILES .118 .065 .360 .460 .856 .065 .175 .354 .710 .090 .016 .530 .400 4,20 MILES -3- r:~agdrptX95X0328Xjo~nmim.tpl/ajp ITEM 28 APPRcIVAI CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFI CrTY MANAG CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Manager/City Council Mary Jane McLarnay, Assistant City Manager March 28, 1995 Community Services Funding Program RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council consider the recommendations for the Community Services Funding Grants for FY 1994/95. BACKGROUND: At the request of the City Council, Mayor Jeff Stone and Mayor Pro Tam Lindemans met with Shawn Nelson and Mary Jane McLarney to review the applications for Assistance League of Tamecula Valley and the Riverside County Child Care Consortium. The Committee is recommending the Assistance League be granted the ~ 1,000 requested amount for equipment for the Speaker's Bureau to promote Operation School Bell, Project Smile and Kids On The Block. The Committee is not recommending assistance for the Riverside County Child Care Consortium for a Child Care Directory. FISCAL IMPACT: A total of $22,500 is available for this program. ATTACHMENT: CSD Funding Requests as of 3128/95 o ITEM 29 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL R~ CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFIC CITY MANAGE CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Mary Jane McLarnay, Assistant City Manager March 28, 1995 Third Amendment to the Fire Protection Agreement for Fiscal Year 1994/95 '- RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the Third Amendment of the Cooperative Agreement to Provide Fire Protection, Fire Prevention, Rescue and Medical Aid for the City of Temecula. BACKGROUND: Pursuant to the City Council's decision to staff an interim fire station, it was necessary to prepare the attached amendment to our contract with Riverside County for fire services. This amendment includes the increased fire protection personnel service costs and station operation costs for the Eastside Fire Station #84. FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate funds are budgeted for FY 1994-95 for the increased level of fire service. 1 8 16 ~0 COOPERATIVE ~GREEMENT TO PROVIDE FIRE PROTECTION, FIRE PREVENTION, RESCUE AND MEDICAL AID FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA THIS THIRD ~w~N~WNT is made and entered into by the City of Temecula and the County of Riverside. RECITALS'. Ww~pm~m, The parties heretofore entered into an agreement entitled "A COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT TO PROVIDE FIRE PROTECTION, FIRE PREVENTION, RESCUE AND MEDICALAID FOR CITY OF TEMECULA- (the **AGREEMENT-) dated July 1, 1994~ and W~x~m~., the parties are requesting an amendment to said agreement attachment Exhibit "A"~ and WHERFa2, the purpose of this amendment is to include the increased fire protection personal service costs for the E~stside Fire Station (Station #84). COVENANTS NOW, THEREFOPa, in consideration of the mutual promises and agreements herein contained, the parties agree as follows: 1. aMeNDMeNT. The parties agree that Exhibit "A" of the Agreement is hereby amended to provide as follows: The attached Exhibit "A" shall be in place for the Fiscal Year 1994/95. 2. EFFECTIV~ DATE. This Third Amendment shall become effective upon execution by all of the above-mentioned parties. /// 1 4 7 8 10 11 14 17 18 19 SO Z4 ~5 ~6 Z7 IMWITMESS WB~PaOF, the City has caused this agreement to be signed by its Mayor and sealed by its Clerk and the County of Riverside by order of its Board of Supervisors, made , has caused this agreement to be subscribed by the Chairman of said Board and sealed and attested by the Clerk of the Board, all on the day and year first above written. DATED: CITY OF TEMECULA ATTEST: BY: MAYOR BY: TITLE: COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE BY: CHAIRMAN, BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ATTEST: BY: GERALD MALONEY CLERK OF THE BOARD EXHIBIT A TEMECULA FIRE SERVICES FY 1994/95 PERSONNEL AND SERVICE DELIVERY COSTS Amended for Station 84 PR~-~OM~. C]-~S~f~CAt~On Po~t~ons Battalion Chief 1.0 Fire Safety Specialist 1.0 Fire System Inspeotor 1.0 Fire Captain 3.0 Fire Apparatus Engineers 5.0 Firefighter II 16.0 Salaries, Benefits, State Administrative Charge: $1,747,630 Total Uniform Allowance $ 20,734' *50% Aerial Truck Staffing Fire Captain 1.5 Fire Apparatus Engineer 1.5 Firefighter II 3.0 Total Positions 24.6 Total $1,768,364 SR~V~C~ DR~.TV~y/D~~ .~PPOR~ ,qR~Vrt'~q Station 12 Station 73 Station 84 Total $199,209 $211,823 $ 53,000 $463,032 Total cost for Personnel and Service Delivery *Less estimated structural fire and redevelopment tax credit NET CITY BILLING $2,232,396 $1,475,996 $ 756,400 exh.S.b~ta. ITEM 30 APPROVAl N CITY ATTOR EY RNANCE OFFIC CITY.MA AG CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Council Ronald E. Bradley, City Manager March 28, 1995 City Council Meeting Start Time RECOMMENDATION: Read by title only and introduce an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 95-,_ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING CHAP'!'Bt 2;04 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO THE TIME AND PLACE OF CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS BACKGROUND: On March 14, 1995, the City Council directed staff to prepare the necessary changes in order to allow City Council meetings to begin at 6:30 p.m. instead of the traditional 7:00 p.m. start time. This change is requested to allow for public comments during the first 30 minutes of the Council Meeting. The dates for City Council meetings will remain on the second and fourth Tuesday of each month. RSCAL IMPACT: None. ATTACHMENTS: Ordinance 95--- R:~AI~DA~'rAFFIS~41~ ~ ORDINANCE NO. 9S- ~" AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CI'~ OF TIIVIECULA AMENDING C~AFI'ER 2.114 OF THE TEMICULA MUNICIPAL CODE ltEt-&TING TO THE TIME AND PLACE OF CITY COUNCIL --- THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMF_,CULA DOES I:fP~k'~Y ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. follows: 2.04 of the Temecula M,,nicipsl Code is hereby amended to read as "9..04,020 - Time ,rid plsce of meetings. A. Regular meetings for the City Council shall be held on the second and fourth Tuesday of each month. Regular me~ings shall commence at 5:00 p.m. for Closed Sessions and 6:30 p.m. for Open Sessions and adjourn at 10:00 p.m., subject to an adopted motion to extend the meeting. Regular meetings sbsll be conducted at the Community Recreation Centmr (CRC), 30875 Rancho Vista Pond. B. The City Cotmcil may, be resolution, designate another date, time and location for a meeting." Section 2. ~.ffeetive F~te. This Ordinance shah be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. The City Clerk shaft publish a summary of this Ordinance and a certified copy of the full text of this Ordinance shah be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five days prior to the adoption of this Ordinance. Within 15 days from adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance, together with the names of the Councilmembers voting for and against the Ordinance, and post the same in the office of the City Clerk. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 28th day of March, 1995. ATTEST: leffrey E. Stone, Mayor lune S. Greek, City Clerk ords~95-~7 I STATE OF C~T,wORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) SS. CITY OFT~!ECULA ) I, JUNE S. Gl~l~rm"3~, City C, lerk of tJae City of Temectda, C~ifonda, do hex~by cert~ that the foregoing Orclinnnce No. 95-_. was duly introduced and phced upon its first _r~din~ at a regular meeting of the City Council on the day of ,1995, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the day of , 1995 by the following roll call vote: AYP, S: NOF, S: ABSENT: COUNCII,MIIV~ItlS: COUNCnMBMBI~RS: COUNCK,MlJV~I~RS: June S. Greek, City Clerk ords~67 2 ITEM 3 1 DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Anthony Elmo, Chief Building Official//~,/ March 28, 1995 Building and Safety February 1995, Activity Report RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. DISCUSSION: The following is a summary of activity for February 1995: Building Permits Issued ............................................. 170 Building Valuation .......................................... ~9,127,312 Revenue Collected ............................................ ~61,544. Housing Starts .................................................... 89 Building Inspections ............................................. 2,175 Commercial Additions/Alterations .............................. 4 - ,82 Sq. ft. New Commercial Starts .................................. I - 15,450 Sq. ft. V:~,TON'i%qEPORTS~ErIS,RPT 312/9~ tie Agenda Report March 28, 1995 Page 2 Code Enforcement Actions .......................................... 780 Active Cases Pending .............................................. 114 Closed Cases ................................................... 56 V:%TQNY~EPOITTSV~i'IS.IFr 3/2~6 td. APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER )~ CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Gary Thornhill, Dire~:ter of Planning,~=~'' March 28, 1995 Monthly Report . RECOMMENDATION: Receive end File Discussion: The following is a summary of the Planning Department's caseload and project activity for the month of January 1995: Caseload Activity: The Department received 4 applications for administrative cases and 3 applications for public hearing cases for the month of January follows: Minor Conditional Use PM Parcel Map-Res No Waiver Public Use Permit TOTAL 3 Ongoing Projects: Old Town Streetscape Improvement Project: The scope of the contract with EPT is being finalized. Council approval is expected in March. Old Town RedeveloDment Project: Staff continues to meet with Zev Buffman and Gene Hancock on project financing. Staff is working with the consultant to finalize the responses to comments. Develooment Code: The Planning Commission began the public hearing process on March 20th subsequent meetings to review the code are April 3rd, May 15th, and June 19, 1995. A joint Banning Commission/City Council workshop to formally introduce a public hearing draft of the development code is being scheduled. A draft zoning map will also be presented at the workshop. The public hearing process before the Planning Commission is scheduled to start on March 20, 1995, A public hearing Draft Code will be available March 10, 1995. R:t31)NTHLY.RPT~I99~AN 3/21/95 vlw 1 French Valley Airoort: The Riverside County Aviation Commission met on January 19, 1995, end recommended approval to the County Board of Supervisors for the Final Environmental Impact Report, Facility Master Plan for the French Valley Airport. The Airport Land Use Commission has postponed consideration of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan until May 1995. Nicolas Valley Soecial Study: Staff presented the land use recommendations to the Planning Commission at the March 6, 1995 hearing. The item was continued to the April 6, 1995 Planning Commission meeting. Winchester Hills This Specific Plan and Environmental Impact Report have been placed on hold by the applicant. Murdv Ranch Soecific Plan and Environmental Impact RepOrt: The applicant has requested additional time in order to make minor changes to the Specific Plan and file. for a Development Agreement application. After the Development Agreement is' submitted and reviewed by staff, this item will be scheduled for Planning Commission and City Council hearings. Johnson Ranch Soecific Plan: The Planning Commission held a public workshop on March 13, 1995. T. hey directed the applicant to increase the open space buffer, increase lot sizes and reduce the number of units. The next Planning Commission hearing is April 17, 1995. : Rorioauah Ranch Soecific Plan: A revised land use plan has been submitted which will be reviewed by staff. The Notice of Preparation will be mailed to appropriate agencies for the EIR which will start the EIR process. Attachment: 1. Revenue and Status Report - Page 4 i:~dGNTHLY.RPT~I99~IAN 3~21~9~ vgw 2 .ATTACHMENT NO. 1 REVENUE STATUS REPORT REVPRIN2 03/02/95 O01 161 ACCOUNT # 4101 4102 4103 410~ 4105 4106 4107 4100 410~ 4110 4112 4113 4114 4115 4117 4118 4120 4121 4122 4124 4127 4128 4129 4130 4131 4132 4133 4134 4135 4136 4137 4138 4,140 4141 4142 414~ 4144 4,145 4146 00:56:2~ GENERAL FUND PLANNING DESCRIPTION HNDED FINAL NAP APPEALS CERT. OF LAND DIV. COMPLIANCE EXTENSION OF TIRE SINGLE FAHILY TRACTS iIJI. TI-FAHILY TRACTS PARCEL NAPS LOT LiNE ADJUSTMENT MIldOR CHANGE PARCEL MERGER (2-4, LOTS) RECORDABLE ~BDIVISICXi 'NAPS REVERSION TO ACREAGE (5+LOTS) SPECIAL SERVICE LETTER SECOND UNIT PERNITS CHANGE OF ZONE CONDITIONAL USE PERHIT CONSISTENCY CHECKS GENERAL PLAN AHENDHENT PLOT PLAN PUBLIC USE PERNIT REVISED PERHIT SETBACK ADJUSTRENT SPECiFiC PLAN SUBSTANTTAL CONFONHANCE TEHORARY OUTDOOR EVENT TEHPORARY USE PERHIT VARIANCE ZONING INFORNATION LETTER CEQA (INITIAL STUDIES) _- CEQA ENVIRCMENT IHPACT REPORT DEVELOPMENT AGREEHENT GEOLOGY CEQA GEOLOGY ORD. 54,7 APZ LAFCO PARCEL MAP/k~AiVER HERGiN AMENDED FINAL TRACT/PAR. MAP CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTIN COIlDO TRACT MAP REVERSION TO ACREAGE LOT REVISIUN AFTER CHECK LOT LINE ADJUST. PLAId CHECK CERT. OF CORRECT. PLAN CHECK CERT. OF COIPLIANCE PLAN CNECK CIXD. CENT. OF CtX4PL. PLN. CERT. OF PAR. MERGER PLAN CK CITY OF TEI4ECULA REVENUE STATUS REPORT FEBRUARY 1995 ADJUSTED ESTINATE .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .O0 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 180,000.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .IX) .OG .00 .00 FEBRI,~Y REVEIE .00 325 .OO .00 *307.00 .00 .00 1,683. OO .00 .00 .00 .OO .OO .OO .OO .O0 5~0.00 .00 .00 3,981 .oo 3,707.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 50.00 .00 .00 .00 568. O0 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 199~-95 RillLIE .O0 65Q.00 200.00 9,T'~1.8~ .00 11.230.00 2~0.00 1,4,10.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 5,492.00 8,810.00 .00 .00 6,153.00 4,887.00 4,,130.00 250.00 4,9,960.30 5,731.00 1,09Q.O0 .O0 .OO .00 2,4,4,5.90 2,629.00 4,000.00 .O0 .00 .00 .OO 500.00 .00 .O0 .00 392 .O0 .O0 .00 .00 .00 .00 .OO PAg~ 1 BALANCE XCOL .00 650.00:. *** 200.00- 1.953.00- *** 9,731.89- *** .00 11.230.00- 230.00- *'*'* 1,4,1O.QO- .OO .DO .00 5,492.00- 8,810.00- *** .00 .00 173,867.00 6,130.00- *** 250.Q0. ~ 5,731 .GO- - *** 1,090.00. .00 .00 .00 2,445.90- 2,629.00- 4,000.00- .00 .OO .00 .00 500.00- **w .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 REVP~IN2 161 ACCOU!iT # 4147 41~ 6149 6150 4151 4152 4153 4154 4155 4156 4157 4170 4175 4180 4200 4206 4226 4260 4261 08:56:25 PLANNING DESCRIPTION VACATIONS PLAN CK DOCUI4ENT PROCESSING CONDEMNATION.PLAN CHECK REVERSION TO ACRE. PLAN CHECK PARCEL MAP PLAN CHECK TRACT NAP PLAN CHEClC Hi)B) HAP PLAN CHECK: 4TH & SUBS. SUBMITTAlS FENA STUDY REVIEU LOHA REViEt~ DRAINACE S'rLR)Y REVIEU IMPROVE iNSPECTiON ON-SITE K-RAT STUDY FEES FAST TRACK PLANNING FORHA FAST TRACK IN HOUSE PLAN CHECKS ANNEXATiON FEES TEHPOP, ARY USE PERHIT ACCESSORY t,/IND ENERGY LARGE FAHILY DAY CARE HAZARDOUS UASTE FACiLiTY LARD DIV UNIT HAP LANDSCAPE PLAN CHECK PLANNING C'iTY OF TENECULA REVEiFJE STATUS REPORT FEBRUARY 1~5 ADJUSTED ESTINATE .00 .00 .00 .00 ,00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 180,000.00 FEBRIMRY REVENIE .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 /30.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 4,205.00 15,946.00 199~-95 REVE~ .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 6,600.00 710.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 187.00 33,6)0.00 16),002.09 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ,00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 6,600.00- 710.00- .00 .00 .00 .187.00- 16,997.91 PAGE 2 COL REPT151 FEES COLLECTED BY ItEC~EIPT PAGE 1 03/02/95 09:16 Stmmmry by Acco.~ Code FEB 95 REV POST DATE RANGE: 02/01/95 Thru 02/28/95 1021 001-161-4102 PLNG-APPEALS 325.00 Total for Accost .......................... 325.00 lOzd 001-161-&10~ PLNG-EXTENSION OF TIlE 307.00 Total for Account .......................... :307.00 1071 001-161 -~,107 PLNG-PARCEL NAPS 1,4~.00 Total for Account .......................... .1,4~.00 1161 001-161-4116 PLNG-CONDITIONAL USE TotaL for Accotmt .......................... 1191 001'161-4119 PLNG'PLOT PLAN :~,981.00 Total for Account .......................... ),981.00 1201 001'161'4120 PLIIG'PUBLIC USE PERHZT 3,707.00 Total for Account .......................... 3,707.00 1251 001-161-4125 PLNG-TBqP OUTDOOR EVEeT 50.00 Total for Account .......................... 50.00 12~1 001-161-4129 PLNG-CEQA (INIT STUDIES) 5~8.00 Total for Account .......................... 568,00 1990 001-161-4200 PLNG-PLAN CK (IN HOUSE) 7)0.00 Total for Account .......................... 730.00 3706 001'161'4370 PLN'LANDSCAPE PLAN CHECK ' 4,205.00 Total for Account .......................... 4,205.00 APPROVAL TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer March 28, 1995 Public Works Monthly Activity Report' RECOMMENDATION: Attached for City Council's review and filing is the Department of Public Works' Monthly Activity Reports for February, 1995. r:%a~drpt~noa~upUajp CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS Monthly Activity Report MARCH, Submitted by: Joseph Kicak Prepared by: Don Spagnolo Date: March 17, 1995 !. WORK UNDER CONSTRUCTION: 1. Pale Communiw P-rk: Construction began on August 15, 1994, and is approximately 75% complete. Construction is expected to be completed by the middle of March, 1995 and the maintenance period is expected to be completed by the end of June, 1995. The hardscape, building, and utility substructure are about 95% complete. The majority '. of the work remaining consists of landscaping the park and installing the site amenities such as a wooden trellis, barbecues, benches and fencing. The project consists of the construction of a lighted soccer field, tennis courts, basketball courts, restroom/concession stand, play areas and parking. 2. Sports Park Slooe Reoair: Construction began at the end of April, 1994. The construction of the project has been completed and the 90-day maintenance period began October 3, 1994. The maintenance period has been extended until the landscape contractor has completed the punch list items generated during the maintenance period. The project is expected to be accepted by the end of February, 1995. The project consisted of the reconstruction of the slope below Margarita Road, the installation of an irrigation system and landscaping on the reconstructed. slope, and the reconstruction of a portion of the earthen channel meandering through the park. 3. Loma Linda Park - Ih The project has been completed and a recommendation to accept the project and file the notice of completion will be made to the Board of Directors when the contractor has submitted the final release and maintenance bond. The project consisted 'of grading and the installation of irrigation, landscaping, play equipment and other amenities. 4. Traffic Signal at Winchester Rd. |HWY. 79N) & Nicolas Rd.: Southern California Edison is expected to complete their portion of the electrical by March 21, 1995. The contractor will then be able to complete the project by installing the traffic signal poles, controller cabinet and stripe the intersection. The project is expected to be completed by the end of March. pwO4Vnoa~--trpt%cip%gSVner 03116fa6 //~'.- Monthly Activity Report March 17, 1995 Page 2 5. Kent Hlnteroardt Memorial Park: Construction began August 22, 1994 and is complete. The contractor is addressing the punch list items generated during the final walk through and the project is expected to be completed by the end Of February, 1995. The project consists of the construction of a 950 square foot concession stand and rest room facility with a 225 square foot porch. 6. Traffic Signal & Vehicle Pro-Emotion Installation: The contractor has completed the pre-emption installation at the four signalized intersections and will complete the nine vehicle emergency pre-emption equipment by March 22, 1995. 7. Pala Road/Route 79S Interim Improvements: Caltrans is expected to overlay Highway 79 South on March 21st and the city's contractor will have his work completed by March 28th. 8. Winchester Road Interim Ramn Improvements: The contractor has completed the retaining wall on the south side of Winchester Road and is now preforming his grading operation. The project will be completed within 3 months. The project will consist of widening both the south and north sides of Winchester Road between Jefferson Avenue and the I-15 south bound ramps. The existing traffic signals at Jefferson Avenue and the south bound ramps will be modified along with the landscaping and irrigation. 9. Traffic Signal at Margarita Rd. & Avonida Barca: The contractor has installed the traffic signal foundations, most of the electrical conduits and pull boxes. Once the poles are approved by Caltrans and Southern California Edison completes their portion of the electrical work the contractor will complete the project by installing the traffic signal poles, controller cabinet and stripe the intersection. This project is Federally funded and consists of the installation of a fully actuated traffic signal, signing and striping at the intersection of Margarita Rd. and Avenida Barca. 10. Moraga Rd. Street Widening: On March 15, 1995 the City Council awarded the project to Ronald L. Harris. A pro- construction meeting will take place by the end of March. This project includes the widening and restriping of Moraga Road between Margarita Road and Rancho California Road, extending the two double box culverts, an outlet structure, channel grading and landscaping. pwO4~n~eetrpt~=ip~gS%mer 03/16/96 Monthly Activity Report March 17, 1995 Page 3 II. WORK IN DESIGN 1. I-15/Winchester Roxd Interchange Modifications: -The Project Report was approved by CaltranS on January 25, 1995. Plans and specifications were sent To Caitrans for review and returned to the consultant on February 8, 1995. The plans and specifications will be resubmitted to Caltrans on February 24, 1995. The City has obtained the services of Riverside County to help in the acquisition of right-of-way. The project is on schedule for bid advertisement by May 1, 1995. 2. Walcott Corridor: ' The consultant is presently revising the plans and expects to return the third plan check by the end of March. The project will provide for two (2) travel lanes (total of 32' of pavement width) within the 66' wide dedicated right-of-way. The alinement will follow the existing right-of-way and accommodate a 30-mph design speed. The total length of the project is approximately 8,500 feet. This project will also include the relocation of Rancho California Water District's existing water main. 3. SDorts Park Parkina and Skate Board Park: The final plan check comments have been returned to the engineer and the plans and specifications are expected to be ready for the solicitation of bids by the end of February, 1995. The improvements include grading, installation of irrigation, landscaping, roller hockey rink, skateboard park, sidewalk, rest room facility and parking lot. 4. Sam Hicks Monument Park Improvement Project: The final plan check comments have been returned to the architect and the plans and specifications are expected to be ready for the solicitation of bids by the middle of March, 1995. The improvements include the construction of a 950 square foot concession stand and rest room facility, an asphalt parking lot, landscaping and irrigation improvements, and assorted park site amenities. The construction activities are to be coordinated with the construction of the museum and church renovation projects. 5. Rancho Vista Road and Mira Loma Drive Sidewalk Improvements: This project is funded from Senate Bill 821 funds for Fiscal Year 1994-95. The project consists of the installation of approximately 14,600 square feet of sidewalk on the northerly side of Rancho Vista Rd. between Mira 'Loma Dr. and Santa Suzanne Dr., the easterly side of Mira Loma Drive between Rancho Vista Rd. and Santa Cecilia Dr., and pwO4%moectrpt~:ip~95~ner 03/16/95 Monthly Activity Report Matth 17, 1995 Page 4 the southerly side of Rancho Vista Rd. east of Avenida de la Reina. This project is in the early stages of design and is expected to be out to bid by May, 1995. 6. Solana Way Storm Drain Improvements - RFP No. :~6: Albert A. Webb Associates has been selected to provide design engineering services for the Solana Way storm drain improvements (Ynez Road to Acacia Park Resort Apartments). The improvements to be constructed include, but not limited to grading, main line storm drain, utility relocations, misc. structures, erosion control, and traffic control. 7. I-151Rancho California Road Interchange Modifications: The project plans and specifications are approximately 60% complete and will be resubmitted to Caltrans after the consultant completes the plans for the northbound off-ramp using the option which includes a 2:1 slope design and the 'purchase of additional right-of-way. 8. I-151Overland Drive Overcrossing Imorovements: The Project Report and Project Study Report have been reviewed and approved by Caltrans. The plans and specifications were submitted to Caltrans for final review on Friday, January 13, 1995 and comments have not been returned to the consultant. The structural plans have been submitted to Caltrans (Division of Structures) on Friday, January 6, 1995 for review and comments have been sent to J.F. Davidson's structural engineer for incorporation into the plans. The consultant is preparing the legal plats and descriptions of the properties that need to be acquired. 9. Temecula Middle School Lighting Project: A professional services contract was awarded to Dream Engineering, Inc. to prepare the plans and technical specifications for the sports field lighting at the Temecula Middle School. The engineer is expected to submit the plans and specifications to the City for first plan check comments by the middle of March, 1995. The Plans and Specifications are expected to be ready for the solicitation of bids by June, 1995. 10. Emerqency Generator: A professional services contract was awarded to RWR Pascoe to prepare the plans and technical specifications for the emergency generator to be constructed at the Community Recreation Center. The engineer is expected to submit the plans and specifications to the City for first plan check comments by the middle of March, 1995. The Plans and Specifications are expected to be ready for the solicitations of bids by June, 1995. pwO4~noactrpt~ip~gb'~nar 03/16/95 Monthly Actfvity Report March 17, 1995 Page 5 11. Interim Fire Station - Fast of I15 A construction contract has been awarded to Nelson Paving and Grading. Construction is expected to begin by the end of February, 1995 and be completed by the middle of March, 1995. The project consists of grading and the construction of an asphalt driveway and a concrete slab for the fire truck and company trailers. pwO4Vnoactmt%dp~b"~mar 0311e/95 LAND DEVELOPMENT Monthly Activity Report Special Projects January, 1'995 Submitted by: Joseph Kicak~ Prepared by: Raymond A. Casey Date: February 10, 1995 FFMA/OFS RFIMBURSFMFNT: Staff is continuing to coordinate with the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the State Office of Emergency Services (OES) representatives in seeking reimbursement for costs incurred by the City due to the January 1993 floods and ensuing disaster declaration. OES has reimbursed the City a total of ~952,832 to date. The Murrieta Creek Damage Survey Report was determined to be a valid claim bringing the total cumulative reimbursable amount to $1,080;996. Staff has also been coordinating with FEMA and OES in seeking reimbursement for costs incurred by the City due to the recent floods of January - March 1995. PARKVIEW SITE (PROJECT NO. PW93-09): The Final Rough Grading Plan and specifications are being finalized by the consultants along with- the Pauba Road Improvement Plans and the Construction Specifications. Rough Grad~--- construction is anticipated to begin in April '1995 and be completed in May 1995. ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 159 (AD 159): The AD 159 improvements, as listed, are at the following stages of construction: Temecula Creek is approximately 99% complete. The Butterfield Stage Road, and DePortola Road improvements are complete and the roads are ready for City acceptance. Highway 79 South plans have been submitted to Caltrans (third plan check) and RCFCD (second plan check). Pala Road's Request For Proposal for environmental consulting has been approved by Caltrans and distributed. Phase I construction (from Butterfield Stage Road to Avenida de Missions) is scheduled to begin this summer. ASSESSMFNT DISTRICT 1 61 (AD 161 ): Winchester Road (Area II) - estimated completion date is January 1996 The Notice to Proceed was issued for Murrieta Hot Springs Road (West) and the estime completion date is mid June 1995. rYmoeeq~/aev/~S/Nbmar~ CAll F'PINA Cnl Aria BYPASS (PROJFCT NO.94-16): study has been forwarded to Metropolitan Water District (MWD) for their review. Staff has /'~ived comments from MWD and has scheduled a meeting to discuss them. OI D TOWN RFDFVFI OPMFNT PROJFCT: The following Requests for Proposals (RFP) are associated with the contemplated improvements in conjunction with the Old Town Entertainment_Project. The RFPs have either been distributed, undergoing review, or the Consultant has been selected. The parking study and the required infrastructure improvements' associated with the Old Town Redevelopment Project were presented to the Old Town Advisory Committee. RFP#27 - Phase I WeStern Bypass Corridor. On January 6, 1995, a revised RFP and Scope of Project was mailed to the five engineering firms that had initially submitted proposals. Phase I was expanded to potentially include the intersection improvements to Western -Bypass Corridor at Rancho California Road. The consultants resubmitted their revised proposals and the consulting contract is being recommended to the RDA at tonight's meeting. RFP#28 - First Street Extension, This. project includes the improvements for the extension of First Street from the intersection of First Street/Front Street/Santiago Road overcrossing Murrieta Creek to the Western Bypass Corridor· Norris-Repke, Inc. was selected to provide professional engineering services, Norris-Repke, Inc, is scheduled to provide Staff with a complete set of plans and specifications by October 1995. RFP#30 - Old Town Parking Study. This parking/circulation study is evaluating parking facility alternatives and alternative modes of local transportation to provide adequate access for tourists and shoppers in and around Old Town. Robert Kahn, John Kain & Associates, Inc. (RKJK) has completed the Parking Study and staff recently approved it. RFP#32 - Western Bypass Corridor Assessment District. The project comprises all engineering services related to the formation of an Assessment District for the design and construction of the Western Bypass Corridor, from Vincent Moraga Drive/Rancho California Road to Highway 79(S), including the bridge crossing over Murrieta Creek (Phase I), and Vincent Moraga DrivelRancho California Road to Cherry Street (Phase II). The scope may be revised to be consistent with the extent of improvements as indicated in RFP#27. The selection process is virtually complete and upon completion, the selected consultant will be presented before the City Council. To date, we have met with Rancho California Water District and Eastern Municipal Water District and all draft, conceptual, and tentative development plans and information have been forwarded. We have also met with Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District's Planning Division and have determined the criteria regarding Murrieta Creek's improvements in order to proceed with the designs of the proposed First Street and Western Bypass Corridor Bridge ,,~--.rossings. · ,le 45 day review period of the Draft Environmental Impact Report ended on January 23, 1995 and we are awaiting comments from the State Clearing House TO: -FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: MEMORANDUM Joseph Kicak, Interim Director of Public Works/City Engineer Brad Buron, Maintenance Superintendent March 1, 1995 Monthly Activity Report - February 1995 The following activities were performed by Public Works Department, Street Maintenance Division in-house personnel for the month of February 1995: II. III. IV. Ve VI. SIGNS A. Total signs replaced B. Total signs installed C. Total signs repaired TREES A. Total trees trimmed for sight distance and street sweeping concerns POTHOLES A. Total square feet of potholes repaired CATCH BASINS A. Total catch basins cleaned RIGHT-OF-WAY WEED ABATEMENT A. Total square footage for right-of-way abatement GRAFFITI REMOVAL A. Total locations B. Total S.F. STENCILING A. 129 new and repainted legends B. 0 L.F. of red curb new and repeinted C. 360 S.F. of sandblasting/grinding VII. 41 3 1 15 823 27 44,400 33 10, 157 MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT- February 1995 Page No. 2 Also, City Maintenance staff responded to 29 service order requests ranging from weed abatement, tree trimming, sign repair, A,C. failures, litter removal, and catch basin cleanings. This is compared to 14 service order requests for the month of December, 1994. The Maintenance Crew has also put in 206.5 hours of overtime which includes standby time, P~M. surveillance (weekends only), and response to street emergencies. I.P.S. STRIPING AND STI:NCILING COMPANY has comoleted the following: 13,562 L,F, of new and repainted striping 0 L,F. of sand blasting The total cost for I.P.S. striping services was ~12,205.37 compared to 80,00 for January, 1994. PFSTMASTFR SERVICFS has comoleted the following: · 0 sites, 0 S.F. of right-of-way weed control, total cost ~0,00 compared to ~0,00 for January, 1994. Public Works PW94-12, FY94-95 Slum/Seal Project has been completed. This project included slurry sealing, crack sealing, treating of all oil stains, and replacement of all stripping and street legends for a total of 20.5 miles total cost of this project was ~186,940,89. The total cost for Street Maintenance performed by Contractors for the month of February, 1995 was $348,656.63compared to $154,973.10for the month of January, 1995. Account No. 5402 Account No. 5401 $348,655.63 ~3,949.02 CC: Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects Raymond A. Casey, Principal Engineer - Land Development Martin C. Laubar, Traffic Engineer MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT- February 1995 Page No. 3 STREET MAINTENANCE CONTRACTORS The following contractors have performed the following projects for the month of December. NELSON PAVING Account No. 540.~ Date: February 3, 1995 Nicolas Road at Calle Medusa A.C. Street Overlay Total A.C. 50 Tons Total S.F. 5,400 Total Cost: $2,450.00 Account No. 540') Date: February 3, 1995 Rancho California Road A.C. Street Overlay Total A.C. 10 Tons Total S.F. 1,640 Total Cost: $1,500.00 Account No. 540~ Date: February 3, 1995 Ynez Road North of Jedediah Smith Emergency A.C. Street Repairs Total A.C. 56 Total S.F. 6,120 Total Cost: $2,754.00 MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT- February 1995 Page No. 4 Account No. 540~ Date: February 16, 1995 Pals Road between Loma Linda and Bridge Emergency Pothole Repairs Total A.C. 8 Tons Total S.F. 3,000 Total Cost: $1,350.00' Account No. 540~ Date: February 17, 1995 Emergency Pothole Repairs "Old Town" Total A.C. 8 Tons Total S.F. 3,000 Total Cost: ~1,350.00 Account No. 540~ Date: February 22, 1995 Emergency Pothole Repairs Rainbow Canyon Road end various Total A.C. 8 Tons Total S.F. 3,000 TotaiCost: ~1,350.00 Account No. 540~ Date: February 28, 1995 Pauba Road West of Via Rami Remove and Replace 354 S.F. of A.C. Total A.C. 8.5 Total S.F. 354 Total Cost: $1,622.50 r:,%reads~mT~gS'~02 .kg MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT- February 1995 Page No. 5 MONTFL;ONI: I:XCAVATING Account No. 540~ Date: February 17, 1995 Emergency Debris Removal Various Locations Total Cost: ~1,626.00 Account No. 540~ Date: February 16, 1995 Emergency Debris Removal Various Locations, Cleaning streets in the City Total Cost: $2,032.00 Account No. 5402 Date: February 10, 1995 Emergency Road Grading for John Warner Road - Liefer Road - Walcott Lane on February 10, 1995 Total Cost: ~768.00 Account No. 5401 Date: February 15, 1995 Emergency Work Jedediah Smith end John Warner Roads Removal of silt and debris from channel on 2/9/95 & 2110/95 Total Cost: 83,470.00 II 4 .DATE 02-02-95 02-03-95 02-03-95 02-03-95 02-03-95 02-03-95 02-03-95 02-03-95 02-06-95 ·-06-95 02-06-95 02-06-95 02-07-95 02-07-95 02-07-95 02-07-95 02-09-95 02-14-95 02-16-95 02-21-95 ~ 21-95 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBUC WORKS ROADS DIVISION GRAFFITi REMOVAL - FEBRUARY, 1995 .~.~...,, .....,..,~ .,~r.,.,..,..~....:.=.,""~ ,,,,.'....;,x~, ....~.,.',..,.~ ..,,.,:, ~,~.,..~.; .............CbMPLETED ........"' ~:':'""" :' "' "' ...,,~, ,. ,,: ,..~,....!~.~; ~,~..,..,~...,..:~. ~..0~.,~.....,,,~ .................. ,,.~......, ..........:~': .;, .:.:..... ~...,', ....... :... ,: ,.W{~RK:;':' ;. ~"'..".' .......,, '."'.' , ~ ,,,~,,,?, .~,!,, ""~":. . . .,:=,,~:;.,~:,,,.," ": . ,,,:,,~ .~,,...,.' , '."'r''..',' ' ".., ,~LOCATION-... ......: "~>','.~ '> ..... ,.~..'~,,,.. .......;~:"!~:'/" '~;'~.' ~'''' "r.; '..:..'.' ;~:.'......'.., ,' .";,~?.t>'~":..:..t~':' I La Serene @ Camino Corto IRemoved Nicolas WIO Via Lobo Margarita ~ N, General Keamey Margar'Ka ~ Cima del Sol La Serena @ Corte Camino Southern Cross ~ Rancho Vista Joseph Road ~ Santa Gertrudis Channel Margarita @ Moraga N. General Kearney @ Santa Gertrudis Channel Hwy,79 N ~ Santa Gertrudis Channel Margarita @ Santa Gertrudis Channel 28550 Pujol Street 28550 Pujol Street Pina Colada @ Via Norte Margarita @ Santa Gertrudis Channel Ynez @ Santa Gertrudis Channel Front Street @ Del Rio Margarita Road @ Rancho Calif, Road 28900 Front Street Santa Gertrudis Channel @ 1-15 4 S,F, of Graffiti Removed 5 S,F, of Graffiti Removed 80 S,F, of Graffiti Removed 23 S,F, of Graffiti Removed 20 S.F. of Graffrti Removed 10 S,F, of Graffiti Removed ' 960 S,F, of Graff~i Removed 120 S,F, of Graffiti Removed .615 S,F, of Graffiti Removed 644 S,F, of Graffiti Removed 316 S.F, of Graffiti Removed 1,250 S.F, of Graffiti IRemoved 10 S.F, of Graffiti Removed 285 S,F, of Graffiti Removed 883 S,F. of Graff'~i Removed IRemoved Removed IRemoved Removed Pala Road @ Condos Removed 200 S,F, of Graffiti 120 S,F. of Graff'~ 20 S,F, of Graffiti 675 S,F, of Graffiti 120 S,F. of Graffiti 120 S,F, of Graf~ti '1 GEAFPEII- NOVh"MR~ 1994 02-21-95 02-22-95 02-22-95 02-22-95 02-22-95 02-24-95 02-27-95 02-27-95 02-27-95 02-28-95 02-28-95 02-28-95 Front Street 'Baja" I-15 (i Empire Creek 27780 Front Street I-15 ~ Best Western Front Street ~ Via Montezuma Pauba ~) Meadows Santa Gertrudis Channel ~ Winchester Channel Pliers ~) Empire Creek Jefferson ~ Burger King 27727 Jefferson Jefferson ~ Burger King Margarita SIO Moraga Road Remove Removed Removed Removed Removed IRemoved Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed 216 S.F. of Graffiti ~ 250 S.F. of Greffiti 420 S.F. of Graffiti 1,180 S.F. of Greff'rd 32 S.F. of Graffiti : I S.F. of Graffiti 30 S.F. of Graffiti 1,290 30 198 15 15 S.F. of Graffiti S.F. of Graffiti. S.F. of Graffiti · S.F. of Graffiti S.F. of Graffiti TOTAL LOCATIONS TOTAL $.F. 33 10,157 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBUC WORKS ROADS DIVISION WORK COMPLETED FEBRUARY 1995 CA TCH BASINS i~ ?.:~:"~::: ...... !. ":.~',.!: ....., ~ . .. '.~:, .' ~.~. '~::::.',~:'~ ....:..i. 02-14-95 Areas #3 & 14 Cleaned 20 Basins I 02-14-95 Areae #1 & #2 · Cleaned 7 Basins TOTAL CATCH BASINS CLEANED -1- pw031zede%wkeqgM~SV)2.CB 030696 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBUC WORKS ~ROADS ,DIVISION WORK COMPLETED - FEBRUARY, 1995 STREET STENCIUNG 02-06-95 Diaz Road SIO Winchester Repainted 20 Legends 02-07-95 Old Town Repainted 30 Legends 02-16-95 Old Town Repainted 47 Legends 02-22-95 AREA #1 Repainted 22 Legends 02-23-95 AREA #2 Repainted 10 Legends TOTAL STENCILS 1 ~9 REPAINTED CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBUC WORKS ROADS DIVISION WORK COMPLETED - FEBRUARY, 1995 R.O.W. WEED ABATEMENT 02-01-95 02-02-95 02-02-95 ~02-08-95 02-13-95 02-13-95 02-27-95 02-28-95 ,""'~-.28-95 Vie Lobo Channel La Serene (i Margarita 40145 Calla Torcida Meadowview e~ee Front Street 6) Del Rio Raze 6th Street ~b Marcedes Rancho Calif. Road W/O Meadows Rancho Calif. Road W/O Bahis Vista Margarite ~ La Serene Way Removed 2,700 Removed ' 3,500 Removed 250 Removed 8,150 Removed 300 Removed 3,700 Removed 5,400 Removed 5,400 Removed 15,000 ,, , ~.~.. ;~, ~ ~1 ,.., !!l~'~?". "~.%~ ~' ~"r~'~', S.F. of R.O.W. Weed~ S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds 44.400 TOTAL S.F.R.O.W. WEED ABATEMENT DATE 02-08-95 02-08-95 02-14-95 02-14-95 02-16-95 02-23-95 02-24-95 02-24-95 02-27-95 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION TREE TRIMMING - FEBRUARY, 1995 Pauba Rood (~ La Primevere La Sierra ~) Los Nogales 27971 Front Street Pauba Road EIO Villa Altures Front Street SIO Rancho California Quiet Meadows ~) Santiago Trimmed 2 Trees Trimmed Removed IRemoved Trimmed Trimmed Trees Tree "Rein" Tree Trees Tree San Pasqual Road Rancho Vista EIO Mira Loma Ave. Sonoma ~) Margarita I Trimmed I Trimmed ITrimmed TOTAL TREES TRIMMED TOTAL TREES REMOVED I I 5 1 2 19 2 Trees Tree Trees -1- F~o~vkm~C~Tm, moss CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBUC WORKS ROADS DIVISION WORK COMKWTED-FEBRUARY, 1995 SIGNS 02-01-95 I Margarita Road N/O Santiago '1 Repaired 02-02-95 Margarita Road N/O Rencho Replaced 02-02-95 02-02-95 02-02-95 02-02-95 Catifomla La Sarena O S. 6en'l Keamey La Sarena 0 Camino Core Nicolas Read E/O Via Lobo Nicolas Road N/O Via Lobo Replaced Replaced Replaced Replaced 02-07-95 02-07-95 02-07-95 r""..13-95 'v/-14-95 02-15-95 02-15-95 02-17-95 02-21-95 02-21-95 02-22-95 02-23-95 02-23-95 02-24-95 02-27-95 27-95 02-28-95 Margarita li Rencho Catif. Road I Mercedes ~) 6th Street Target Center Pauba WIO Remi Rancho California Road ~) Yukon Pals Road 0 Highway 79 So. Rancho California Road ~) Target Center Winchester (i) Jefferson Single Oak (g) Business Park Drive Ave. Barca Ynez Road N/O Palm Plaza De PortoIs 1Oi Ynez Road Rancho Colifomla Road Q) Town Center Ynez Road ~g) Via La Cotinas Core Tolano Q) Ave. Sanores Av. Sonores & Margadta Corte Alhambra (i) De Is Reins Replaced IReplaced Replaced Replaced Replaced Installed Replaced Replaced Replaced Replaced Replaced Replaced Replaced Replaced Installed Replaced Replaced W-11, 2R-26D R-26D 'T.C.' R-26D Graffid R-1 E.G.G. 8 Carsonites W-56 Type "N" W-41 "T,C,' R-1 Grsffiti 2 Delineators 'T.C~" R-26 'T.C.' R-7 & "K" Marker 'T.C." 2 C.I.P. Signs 5 Delineators 'T.C.' 'K" Marker "T.C." R-1 'T.C." R-26 D 'T.C.' T.P.D. Directional stolen Type 'N' faded 2 "K' Markers 'T.C." 3 'K' Markers 'T,C,' R-1 R-1 "Graffiti" R-1 + Type "N' SIGNS - FEBRUARY, 199~ 02-28-95 Psubs Road WIO Msrgarits Road Replscsd TOTAL SIGNS REPLACED 41 TOTAL SIGNS INSTPI m Frs '3 TOTAL SIGNS REPAIRED .1. ! I TRAFFIC REnUESTS TRAFFIC DIVISION Monthly Activity Report For February, 1995 Submitted by: Joseph Kicak Prepared by: Marty Lauber Date: March 16, 1995 TRAFFIC 'REQUESTS: Dec. Jan. Feb. Received 6 4 9 Completed 6 3 5 Under Investigation 5 9 8 Scheduled for Traffic Commission 3 2 I II. DIVISION PROJECTS: A. The Traffic Division has added additional roadway delineation at the intersection of Margarita Road and No. General Kearny Road to reinforce proper channelization. Raised pavement reflectors have been placed along lane striping on each approach to the intersection. Be Received City Council approval for Traffic Engineering Firms to design interim traffic signals on State Route 79 (S) at Margarita Road/Redhawk Parkway, Pala and La Paz St. As soon as project contracts are executed, design work will begin. C: The Public Works Department has entered into a project with the City of Murrieta, WRCOG and Hank Mohle and Associates to update the Southwest Area Planning District - Travel Forecast Model. This will allow staff the opportunity to test various roadway improvement projects to gage City wide traffic impacts. De Issued a work order for the re-striping of Ynez Road in the area of Tierra Vista Road. This project is designed to provide a protected left turn movement from Northbound Ynez Rd. Additional roadway construction is required to accommodate striping changes. Ee We also issued a work order for modification of Ynez Rd. Northbound left turn pocket at Rancho California Road. Left turn vehicles extend out of the existing turn lane during peak periods. Our changes extend the turn lane through the intersection of Rancho Highland Drive. r:~no~ctrpt~rai~95~O1 .fsb TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ITEM 1 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING CITY OF TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICE DISTRICT FEBRUARY 14, 1995 A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Community Services District was called to order Tuesday, February 14, 1995, 8:14 P.M., at the Temecule Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California, President Ronald Roberrs presiding. PRESENT: 5 DIRECTORS: Lindemans, Muf~oz, Parks, Stone, Rotarts ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None Also present were City Manager Ronald Bradley, Assistant .City Manager Mary Jane McLarney, City Attorney Peter Thorsen and City Clerk June S. Greek. PUBLIC COMMENT None CONSENT CALENDAR It was moved by Director Stone, seconded by Director Lindemans to approve Consent Calendar Items No. I and 2 as follows: 1. Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of January 24, 1995 2. Maroarita Park Site RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the Design Services Agreement of $91,100 with Alhambra Group Landscape Architecture for the Margarita Park Site Project. The motion carried as follows: AYES: 5 DIRECTORS: NOES: 0 DIRECTORS: ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: Lindemans, Mu~oz, Parks, Stone, Robarts None None COMMUNITY SR:IVIC;:S DISTRICT MINUTI:R FI:BRUARY 14, 1995 ~ GENERAz MANAnER'S RI:PORT None DIR~:CTOR OF COMMUNITY Sq:IVICFS R~=PORT Director Nelson stated department staff was advised last week that the City received a Facilities Design of Excellence Award for the Community Recreation Center from CPRS. Director Nelson said Mayor Stone and CSD President Ronald Robarts will be accepting the award at the Annual CPRS Conference on March 4, 1995. Adjoumment It was moved by Director Stone, seconded by Director Parks to adjourn at 8:19 P.M. The motion was unanimously carried. The next regular meeting of the City of Temecula Community Services District will be held on February 28, 1995, 8:00 P.M. at the Temecula Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. President Ronald H. Robarts ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk ITEM 2 APPROV CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFRC CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: Board of Directors FROM: Ronald E. Bradley, General Manager DATE: March 28, 1995 SUBJECT: Parkview Site Improvement Project - Phase I and Phase II PREPA Phyllis L. Ruse, Senior Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors: Approve Amendment No. 2 of ~28,425to the design contract with RJM Deign Group, Inc. for Phase I and Phase II of the Parkview Site Improvement Project. '- Appropriate $27,625 from Public Facilities - Development Impact Feea to the Capital Projects Account. BACKGROUND: Phase I of the Parkview Site Improvement Project is for the construction of a fire station on Pauba Road west of Margarita Road and the off site street improvements to Pauba Road. Phase II of the Parkview Site Project will provide a small detention pond and improvements to a portion of the channel in the Rancho California Sports Park. On February 28, 1995, the Board of Directors approved Amendment No. I to the Parkview Site Improvement Project to include Phase II in the project. Amendment No. 2 will provide the following design components. First, staff is requesting that the Board approve an additional $27,625 for the design of the half width improvements to the north side of Pauba Road between Mergerira Road and the eastern boundary of the Lutheran church site. The additional street end sidewalk improvements will enhance traffic circulation, improve public safety, and will provide pedestrian access and expanded recreational opportunities. Second, RJM Design Group has determined that the original Parkview Site topographioal survey needs to be modified to provide the necessary base sheets due to increased siltation that has affected the chennal's elevation. The cost for the expanded tope is ~800. Finally, the Board of Directors directed staff to include additional design services to add the waterfall infrastructure along with the construction of the channel amenities. RJM Design Group has indicated that they will design the water features to include an oversized vault and utility stub outs to accommodate a future waterfall feature. This work will be completed as pert of their original contract at no additional cost to the City. The designer has suggested that the City install the pipe at the time the mat of the waterfall feature is constructed. Insta~stion of the pipe would require full design of the waterfall, including grading 'pierks. GracFmg to install the pipe would disturb the slope end necessitate extensive erosion control measures. The designer also expressed concern that the pipe would degrade while not in use. FISCAL IMPACT: Cost of design services of Amendment No. 2 for construction drawings and construction administration is $28,425. It is recommended that 827,625 be 8ppropriated 'from Public Facilities - Development Impact Fees to Account No. 210-190-626-5802. Sufficient funds exist to fund the $800 cost of modifying the topographical survey. ~MENT NO. 01 TO CONTRACT ORDER NO. 16397 Parkview Site Improvement Projea M~rch 98. 1995 The Agreement dated Cletober 11. 1994 between the City of Temecnln, and 1UM r~esign Gro~lp, Inc.. (hereinafter ~ to as "Agreement") is IRn~y amended as follows: Pc: ADDITIONAL SERVICES Reefion 1 Scope of Work is hereby amended to include additional services as described in Exhibit "A" (attached). Compensation for these additional services is a not to exceed $28,425 to be paid in accordance Section · All other terms and condilions of the Agreement shall remain the same. The parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date and year first written above. CONSULTANT C1TYOFTEMECULA By: By: Jeffx~ E. Stone, Mayor Peter Thorson, City Attorney ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk Mar. 13 '95 14:55 ~l:14F~ ser%ws P, 2 IIBCRIFTION OF 1.0 PAIK VIEW arrE DDROVEMBNT PROJECT (PeaIra Rind dr-die Feed im,__o,a: INs) DESIGN Pa'fm'm field survey of Pauba Rod from proprood church site m Marprim Road. Survey dull combt of crou fia~,~ t of Paba ltmd at Z0' himyah indicating lxecim aisdal paveera elevt~on~ dons with the loml~ ~! elevation of exbtini udlby 2,0 CONSTRUCTION Civil P-,~,l n_lnl (m~lltlo~ off .le ~ i,.p~vt -~e~.t, l>fod_cod as pm of bite bid Prepme final designs mi plea rdgve to chrl] antinMdnl includbag sits and mad plato. Pepare one mof Stree~anm Plato forthe northerly 1/2 width of Peba Road from the ear, erly property line of the pmpoid Lmheran Church ,its to Marprita P, oad in sc_-oL'dance with the standard requiremere of the City of T~_ L_ls. The Irade and meet crone shall conform as close u pouible to the esisdnf Fade and sectioN. Improvemere plans dull provide for a wideeinl of Ptuba Road from the e0dainI northely edp of pavement to the ultimate northerly curb lot, don. h.-rovm required urmhedy of the exi,tinl cenm'Lke of Pnba Road are not included wifhh this scope of work. b. Tr~Re b,.blh~ Prqare one set of Sipinl and Slripini Plans for d:te propmeet roadmy baud upon the flal improvmms plans prc~-~4 by Cor.-,i,*q, and Ib madm'ds and requiremine of the approF'im F, ve---- wnul .hurigicdonal qencT. Prepare a Find Quand~ and Cm Embn~ bued on the lapmvemem plato for huba 8radialend !mprovememl)llmapiM~edbTtboCity. INIleamdel411emed' p,a~-~" !elel rjar. 13 '95 14:56 SI:I%=l:IXS2G~ se~es P. :3 JarRare t,~hni:-' qr~J~c at ~cr - cmfformlnl wJlh the most recent: mpp!lcable gmMm'dm and · city of Tanran "bone ha* provided by the city for: -Gerard Conditka-- -Special Pfovitionl · city ot Tememh Stmsdmd PIn and Specieadorn · SUndm'd Specd~c=dm, fc~ Public Works Coamnmlon C'Ore-: 12c~"), ~ odJdoa. State of California Standard Spect~adons and Standard PIns, iafmt didon. ~. 9-~, 4.0 CONSTI~ON ~T!ON PHAII provide --ml-.,,~ for any rim. film fir m, ision to the comrm for oommaebs. drawbPndrdatedmbadtudsda!lborevbwedandretumedtotheconmlmatforqefoFjtm erakin. TbeCrjmzv. l~'wrequemforhformiioa. proponlmquem. tndrdled~m,,q..~ dull IM lamded Io on a rquhr bib. Conu,.-,..r_', Co-~'qqt on a monlbly buds in IccordlnCe wllb the lanoum of work conlpleted lid Ja Icc~-('--~a wids tbe oontract4ocu~nr. At evefT job sito meetlag, rotnines datl PublbkH md dblttetal by tbo Conmdunt to dl pattim concerned. apeclficdly noting curfeet Itudmlmd eldmmM' ,---. k l~Fd1'%. t '-Ill el; !IIIi 2of8 Har. l~ '95 14:56 ~/~F*I:IX52Ga ser~es P' ~ 3of8 work shall be prqmf.i~. I~k.lU' I| dillon Alxemmemmion~dmllboorlmizodmdco,,dmyBdlobrlefdlpmim~~ lemal ml spedd requimuem of~he coms~for~. Pmcodurd maura, routing Of inrormufir,% mi Inject rr~n,r "yes dull be defined. AUendees shall include ropr pemtfivm from the City*s staff, the Consultant, the Comd~a ~f, and all mjor -dbCOn'rmmS. Job me Marerip ud chinira so the contract for construction are routinely ..onltocod. The Consultant shall publish and distribute m fidd nlxtn for each Job tim neetin& dc~,moethl the profess of construction and spee. ifk~y noting curtms and delinquent action item. The Consultant shall review all ret~ shop ctrawjup and ~ated tutnnjUals u required by contract documoms. Atthecor'Fiafio,,of~boConsttuctionbafinalJobd~omoetinl (&o last of ~roo) andzeviow of b alia fac~Jgy shall be continued. ^ final punch list win be ,blbhod and distributed by the Consulant w dl pmlm concob ~wcl, specifically norths rmpired corrections, non-oonfonninl work, and ~k rw. ~' 'q m k ~mpleeed. Mar. 13 '95 14:57 Si:~A~ series P, 5 PHASE l: Dmjfn and Comamotion ])Nu~v~.~* fow additknml off. de mad iq,,mv/ vL 1 .o Dm . Deveaop. 2.0 Cmsmu:t~ DommmU 4.0 C0llllfUdk~ ALImi~bft OmdFmTond eln order to myra axmu!lmK mop on r~4oJiaphlc, primin,% ~hk, and m, itboutmallestiondataTemeculaacaantbek--t,a'-,bhedealocdblgeWim~ for tin PerkHew its F:pro,atmi PrqJ~ (addlfioml huh Road OIf.4he Rotd ]nip-off . ds). This will save the dry .11:zoxj- ndy 10-205 city dbmunt and .o0: mark-up) S.3 AZmiTIONAL anrv'scsS Sinvim widde ere am sit;F~aqy Mmlfied herHa m eervkm m be pezfmmid by ~ Z:)miJn eap of bs cameltam ere eoqtd fr,;J "Addit~-~ $ervkm" tbr pupore of mb Ap;aaf~ CitYmmYl'equ~tbllJMl:hmiln(hxmppffformmylawbichm. oAdd:Mio~Servicm. However. RJM Dmip Oroup is um oblllmed m perform rich Addilk,.-' Service, unim an n"mqdh~N tO 'lJdl AJ~,_I fqt bll beell faHy eaecuted settinf form tho scopo, s-~e~lwle and fm fur tml AddJtJot~ Setvia. In Ihe event R JR Demjp ~roup pOK~sud Additional SefvJ(NJ beforo tecdpt of such aecuted -m,,mtmeet. the C.J~y acknowledge its oblipdon to lay for Mfviees at RIM Dmip 0roup's stmdatd rates, within 30 daya Of receipt oflUM Dedgn Otmlp'l Tb followtml item droll not {M spin of the fmo Idaraffled in the pays._ ' MCtion dxw'e, but dulJbefedmbmtsddotoRJMDedBnGrmmp. A. Addidoml :: t:'ne~ and ab vtsim m audubed by the City of Temeeulm 4 of 8 ~ar.13 '95 14:58 SI:~F'~ series P. 6 S.4 !/uvlr~--~r ,,~t lwn!~m Report or CBQA uder~Rm'awommacr. A. City dial] provide accau to lira site, City Js lo proyide any and dl tndemnj~cM~m, :~*r ~ dispoul or ol~ tactJoin required, b7 local, mm or fMml law relurdinl htnrdou D. City shall pay all ~r.~nu,eotal fee, md costa. City dull require my eommactlou corn, from to indamalfy Comuitant firam mty and di tomre. danape. clatms, expemm, including momey fees. and coma arbing out of the eoausamr's work, s--sgtbaS only lossss, dsmsSes, dsims, es;sses includkS sUsssy's fees and corn ~ m'e caused by I~s sole nellileace or willful misco~uct of PJM Deliin Gigup I,qdlor I~bcollluhmr. in perfonnjllf Jl;I mervlem under bb city will reindin that me corntraction eo~'a~t re add IJM Daip ~ and m~ (Conwltmm) 8s m s~IPi,mmt inmarmd in the eoalprebmaivm Irarural liability, auto limbllity, wortm' compr, dntion 8rid ImDder i inmarauce 5 of 8 glyds_ x J,S4M4 SI:i~F~ ser~es ~ Client slim lo laPJr Cmmultant a co',N'~ m:~q 1ix' d] amlxx. bad wink Mduded in Scope of Serdcs liw~fofo retail, at tho hourly ate. Mow. Blnbtls fir dl time nd msmdds sod eomrm~ e-~-,d,~ wodc sh~ bah s=cord~ with the level of work~ sad will be brokea into the maSorks Ilsmd above. Iza~/s~ov~r oe~~esah Aupst 1st In s~cordsnce w~ say Inca'ease In the Cosstnas's Pries 6of8 tssMIbsls&sSmmmsd', v' Her. 10 '95 12:3~ St:~F~ ser~es P. 4 DESIGN GROUP, INC. !'LOININ~ AND I~W,I!~3A.I'$; &RC~3~K~URI 7 of 8 ~ylltS luS~ City of Ter~a 43174 ~uf~us hrk Ddve TeeecrU, CA 92590 u~_._ PL, kview *Prod° Topo This lettgr is u} ctmfmn your verbal autlmr~tkm today to ~ wilh obaining a plot of the topo tms infomafi~ from avglabk~m'ial sumy dm~own in October 199~ forthe creek and As tim is of aim ~msmu~, this work will r..ommma~, immediately mad !:m ~ompltqmd within wst fow $800. Thank ~ for this oppmumity to continue to work with tl~ Cixy of Te-mec~Pt. Sheerely, RjM Dedp Group, In~. S928S LAS RAMaLAS, SUITS ue · MISSam V!WJO, cA rae~ · ('n4) m-vsm * FAX Ore) SIa. eGS Her. 10 'c j5 1~:~ SI~I~F~ serzes P. 3 .:, DESIGN GROUP, INC. AND I,ANDSCAIsJ AIC~R~ 8 of 8 March 10, 199J 4~174 Bininto Park Dzivs T~ ~ e:tttm. CA 92590. R~ lsaA'visw "Ponds WSedall roemen, services provided under the recent contract amendment spproved by Council. Thsm b no additional chartres ,,ocisR~d with this work. Should the (::it), want design devmlolmmnt and aammctioa doavm,mts for the waleffall ck~ncnt, to bid U an altonrots item, w~ would Ins happy to Fovide you with an eVlmste at that time. It is a pleasure to condnue working with you on this tnuu~sfing project. A.I.A., a?'as IA$ IAMILAL $Urll ass · MIllION VlE$O, CA ~ * C/M) iTeM * FAX 4'/14) Sl34431 AMENDMENT NO. 01 TO CONTRACT ORDER NO. 16397 Parkview Sit= Improvement Project Msrch ?8. 1995 The Agreement dated October 11. 1994 between the City of Temecula, and l~rM rL-sit, n Groqp. Inc.. (hereina_f'ter referred to as "Agreement") is hereby mended as fonows: Re: ADDITIONAL SERVICES ,~,eetion 1 Scope of Work is hereby amended to include additional services as described in Exhibit "A" (attached). Compensation for these additional services is a not to exceed $28,425 to be paid in accordance with the contract provisions. Section 2 All other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain the same. The parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date and year first written above. CONSULTANT CITY OFTEMECUIA By: By: Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor Peter Thorson, City Attorney ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk v:~elkvw.amd 031711 EXHIBIT A P. 2 1 A. Pm'ix~nfiddm-'YeyofPmbtRoadfrompmpmod~~to MmpdmP. oM. Survey droll comjn of crms ,ec~,0_ s of Pmh Road a~ 50' h~ervds indictsel, pcecim edninl puememc elevation donf with the ]ocm2on tnd deva~n of ubtinf u~JJL7 aplmzUm~. Civil ~qliaesd~4 (MdlUon.d mY-elm road in,pmvamam produced m pm of bmo bid Prepare find dmips and pin reM/ve m cfvU enlineednI tncludtnB site and road pin. Tbo Fade and m c,x>u sec-ir dudl conform u cime m promibis to the ub~ue frode and ,morn. bmpiovmemt pin dmn provide ~ a widmhaa of Pmba }.osd from tim eaisth~ normsfly edlo of pavmne~ to the oiltrusts ~ ~Plld~l Road m IMx lllchtded within flail ItCO~ Of M~:)rk. b. M,,- .~wll)lql, PIn lateprate m m of Slfnint end Slzipinl Plato fo~ the Fopon-' roadway based upondmfin~ bnpmmmpmp~--,~byConmmot, mdmomodardsnd rquirmmau of ~ho appop. hie Bo',~-, ~:' u .ludr, di~mml Preparo a Find Qumtity and Cost wqt**,ate breed ~ the I.-,p,ovommt ptu for Pauba Rold, Q~-~l:l'll / be couq)Oed ~ IclJed Ind l~mwlm.ler J]MdlX~rl~lm~ from b Plar. l.l '~ 1~,:5~ 51qhFR><5~2~ ser~es P. 3 Papwin teclmicd spectftcador$ coamxzabi wlt the most ~ applicable sandarda and · City of Temecula 'boilerplato' provided by ths City for: -Gerard Conditions -Special Provisions -Notice ~ Bids, Contrm At,~.f2znt, Bid Bonds, Instructions to · City of Tememla Standard Plmm and Speoffimtom · Standard Speciflcatimm for Public Works Co~n ('arm'), tatat edition. · State of California Standard Spocifications and Standard Plans, let edition. 3.0 BIm)ING PHASE mini ..,:e,e'_. TIm Cer*ul,-,,t dadl assist Is Chy with tbo atddinl :Plum otr the projMt. Qup~c~. clarificatlem, or conflicts ariainI out of due blddinf proam will bo rmolvod by addmda prepared by the Consultant (maxiron,,, (2) two addends). ,tdde~da to b contm:t for construction shah be prepared In writing to document an,/clarification or modification made to the coronet 4.0 CONSTIUCTION ADMINISTRATION PHiLeat 2 of Mar. 13 '~ 14:56 Sf~t~F~ series P. 4 (tldrdvidl) wal4broslh and review. AftndPmadalistforaUrecjdredcoffsclasamd .work dall be pr~pat.i. During the Comtmcmm Phase of the proj~, me foaowiq rotvim shaU be mrnidamd: Alalimmtni~kmcoafkraw. sdtdlbeorJanizsdmideoqd~tobrlefllllmftlmconcernldwllla r,~,. rv~ tttvm from the City's staff, the Consultant. lhe Contractor, and all ramjog mabcontxamms. publish and distrim I field report for each job tim meetin& ~-~m-whI, ibm propms of construction anti spreeliP, sHy noting torrent md ddlmiuma salon items. ProJect cbm-Out work, and work ra _',dq,, to be oomplaed. 3 of ~4r.1~ '95 14:57 F:I:M~F~ serzes P. 5 S.3 sJ FEE f~ludJLE It it the objective or ore' Dealart Tan co Za~vid, the most ~jve, yet eraelm maxaria tothedevdoPmmtofttmaddjtjoftdPmballmdO&Sitoaoadlmpfovmnmm. Inpaitminl In servicm Immmcler, ]UM Dedp OrouD hu or wm recedve faro..d~n pr~y~red or complied by othen, the acmru~ and complecaum of which RJM DerJin Group is erameal to rely upon PHA$~ I: Dedin and Comicdon Docanmm for additional or*NIle rood improveurea. 1.0 Dealan Devdopment 2°0 Comtmakm Docummts 3.0Biddi~ 4.0 ~ ~drnintt**~k~q 120,12S. S soo. ,m ~ ALLOWANCi win order to save conreliant mark-up on reprographic, printbl, photolrtp~, and delivery map0ases, it is our softestion that m Temecolm account be established st a local blueprlnt~o,,pdmy for the Parkvim Sits Improy, -~t ProJect (additional Pauba Road Off-6Jte Road lmprov~ ,__its). This wjli ave the city approxJmtdy 10-20% city discount and roT: :draw mark-up) AXmmONAL natvxcss Servir.~wb.le are not flN. i~ny ideadried herein as re'vices w be perrotund by RIM Dmiln Group bs ctmsuitme are comidered "~ddktoqi' Services' for l:mrposee of mb Asta Ter,,e TM City my x, oqu,t eat ~M DedSn 0roup perform wvtm which are Add)do--: Services. However, IUM Desip (3roup is not oblipmd to perf~m such A~Mtmd Services unlea an a~=Adb,nt Io ~ AI~: ~rt ]m bemi hlly executod sefftnf fot~ the scolM, s-laedule md leo fur such Additional Services. In the went PJR DosiF Group perfmma Additional Services beforo receipt of such exocuted smmdment. the City acknowledges its oblifation to pay for such services at RJM Ded~ Gmup'l st~,,d~,.d ram, within 30 dsys of receipt of RJM DesiF Oroep's '1"b0 following hems ahall not b~ ·pm of the fee Jdenti~ed in the payment section above, but dudl be mimburublo to RJM DedBn Group. A. AdditMBIl mK,i~ aid I~o ~ ii Itilhor~ed by the City of TemecuJL B. Prepsration of addmond TopoFaphic and Boundary 4 of 8 Mar.~3 14:58 !/uvUop,,,~,,,~, lmpm aspon or Ci~A ~w,.,~_ ~Y..~ if mluir~ droll k ~ msdsrsepsmm mm'act. RJMDedlnGmuPlhlllProvjdethenmauryplandtoeitevishnsrequmtod bymo cieyrortweplanehockroviews. A!lmbmpemchmgmdatlbe~oneinmxmlan~ with the artrated Standard Hourly Pee $ebedole. A. City thai] provide acceu mem she, B. City shsaa'pmvids ss mp-m-d~e title Cs City is to provide any and all tndanniflcation, ~- - t, dispmal or tuber ac~om requfmJ by local, mm or fMerd law reprdinf hanrdom City I1~11 pay all 2twsfnmental fees and costs. City shall mpdrs say rossreaction contr mrs to indmmi~ Consultsat lama my and all losses, damsis, clsbm, espmsm, ~dmli~g attorney fees, real costs sisfag mat of the codu z~'s work, ~ceptlnS only losre, dresses, dsbns, mapms indudtnl moas,/s fern and corn whida am caused by tim sole millfence or wilJfol miscond~ of lhsiln. Orou~ ss~rer suhconssvltan,~ in perfo~ its services ~nder ltab City w~! require ltmt me corntraction conu'an~ add ~H DMlp Group and mnsuimm (Comultet) ss m addlib,m/insm'ed in the comp, ehmtsive pssrsl llabfiity, auto liability, wox'ken' compmmstion md builder risk tmursace mverlps rsquimt by the City, 5 of 14:58 SI::iNF~ serzes P. S~ The Client qrees to lay Comulmnt as c~-.~r, iQ for dl amhofizwd work btduded In the Scopo of See?ices hetttofofe slated, at the howly ram below. I;tlNClPAL LAND~CAPIK ARC~ux~r LANDSCAP/~ ARCaffECT Di:~rON!~ SaN/OR DP-Arz~z-:~.xSON 3UNIOI Dlt.~x ~'~ON Fret ,~ OBSERVATION WORD PROCESSOR $100.00 Per hast 188.00 per hour I82.00 per hour S.~.00 per hour S4S.00 per hour $88.00 pet hour $3S.00por hour Billhis ~ all time and minerIda and c~iiet extemion work dudl be in accordance wids the level of work peffbnned find will be broken into rise catqories ILa~ above. ,FRR Fees will be e~c,,~ated each Aulust ht in accordance w~ ny increase in the Commn='s Price Index or other mutusL1y 8iteed upon cost index. BolJnninf wilh August 1, 1995. All provbions for meahtiom stated, pemln to all contract extension and ,cMMoq-~ wott. 6of8 Hat. 10 '95 12:3& SI:II, FRX52e series P. 4 DESIGN GROUP INC PL&NNIN~ AND L&ND6CAJ~ ARCI!IT~.'T(}~ of 8 //' ~ This letlet ts to cof~q~ )sour veftml .:ph,.n~mitm today to proceed with oblaininl a plot of the Tl~udc you for thia el~Kn~udty ~o cominue m ~ork wire me city Sincerely, IU'M Dedln Group, Inc. · , -,.I.A., A. 2?3$s LA$ aLAS, SUITS 240 · MISSION VmJ~ CA 9sin, (714) re-?sag · PAX ~'m) S$344~ rtar. 10 '~5 12:3~ SRNFa serzws DESIGN GROUP, INC. FLANNINGANDLANDHCA!~ARCifflT, C'!tIRE 8 of March 10, 1995 RI~: hrkvimv *Pond' WaMz~D tle. aaeat selvk:e$ provided tinder file racefit conilact ;m~mdment lipproved by Council. There i$ no additional charSw ,,~iat~d with this work. Should tim City want desi/n development and cemtruc~on~tsfor thc~elmn~nt, to bid as an alternate item, we would be happy It is a pleasur~ to continue working with you on this InUreresting project. Sincerdy, RJM Bradins Gnmp, I~ A.LA., RJM/Ie 272BS LAS RAIMBLAI, ~ 2M, MIllION VIEIO. CA 9'2iN · ('714) f82,.?ele * PAx ('114) ~8244b ITEM 3 APPROVA GENERAL COUNSEL FINANCE OFF~~ CITY MANAG TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AGENDA REPORT General Manager/Board of Directors Peter M. Thorson, General Counsel March 28, 1995 Consideration of Adoption of Resolution Approving the Master Property Tax Exchange Agreement Between Riverside County and the Temecula Community Services District Regarding Property Subject to Annexation RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors adopt the Resolution approving the Master Property Tax Exchange Agreement with the County of Riverside pertaining to property subject to the annexation to the Temecula Community Services District, title as follows: RESOLUTION NO. CSD95- "A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT, APPROVING THE MASTER PROPERTY TAX TRANSFER AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AND THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE UPON ANNEXATIONS OF TERRITORY TO THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT" BACKGROUND: Pulte Homes Corporation has filed a request with the Local Agency Formation Commission to annex certain property within the City's Sphere of Influence to the City. Under the provisions of California Revenue and Taxation Code Section 99 et sea., each agency affected by an annexation must approve a property tax transfer agreement for each annexation or may enter into a Master Property Tax Exchange Agreement. Because Revenue and Taxation Code Section 99 only allows a 30-day period to conclude the negotiations on property tax exchange or the annexation is terminated, a o~8/qGP--3171.1 master property tax exchange agreement has its merits. Pulte has presented the City with a draft of a Master Reel Property Tax Transfer Agreement for consideration, Pulte's agents have represented to the City that the County of Riverside would be willing to execute the Agreement as presented. Because the Temecula Community Services District currently receives no share of the real property taxes, and the services provided by the TCSD are separately funded, the draft Master Real Property Transfer Agreement provides that no property tax shall be transferred to the TCSD upon annexation of the territory to the City. In the 'event, future annexations appear to have a financial cost associated with them which would make them a financial burden to the City, the City may repeal this Resolution and negotiate a property tax exchange agreement on a project-by-project basis. In the event the future annexations are financially favorable to the City, adoption of this Agreement allows the annexation process to be streamlined. FISCAL IMPACT: Adoption of this Agreement which proposes no transfer of property tax will have no direct fiscal impact on the TCSD as it currently receives no property tax, A condition of approval of each of the projects Subject to the annexation will be entering into the appropriate funding mechanisms for the TCSD. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution agreeing to the Master Property Tax Transfer Agreement. ORANGe3171.1 -2- RESOLUTION NO. ~ A RF_,~LY~FION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT, APPROVING THE MASTER PROPERTY TAX TRANSFER AG~~ Bk;'I'W~:~:N THE TEMECI~,A CO~ SERVICES DISI~ICT AND ~ COUNTY OF RIYEESIDE UPON ANNEXATIONS OF TERRITORY TO THF~ TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT WHEREAS, the County of Riverside and the Temecula Community Services District ("Temecula CSD") are the agencies whose public services would be affected by any annexation to the Temecula CSD; and, W~I~ekEAS, representatives of the County and the Temecula CSD have met and negotiated an exchange for property tax revenue to become effective for areas annexed fo the Temecula CSD beginning July 1, 1995; and, . WHEREAS, this exchange for property tax revenue is in the best interest of the citizens of the Temecula CSD; and, WHEREAS, Section 99(d) of the C~lifornia Revenue and Taxation Code now provides for adoption of a master property tax transfer agreement, which agreement may be revised from time to time by the parties; and, WHEREAS, the adoption of such an agreement would contribute to a reduction in paperwork and to an increase in efficiency; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Temecula as the governing body of the Temecula CSD desires to enter into a master property tax transfer agreement with the County of Riverside. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE TEMECULA CSD DOES RESOLVE AS FOT-TDWS: Section 1. Upon annexation of territory to the Temecula CSD, no portion of the property tax revenue generated within the territory annexed under the ad valorem tax rate established by Article ~trr& of the Constitution of the State of California shall be transferred to the Temecula CSD. Section 2. The County Auditor is hereby requested to convert the above established percentage figures into actual dollars, and thereafter to allocat~ such property tax revenue in accordance with the provisions of Section 95 et ~. of the California Revenue and Taxation 09,adqOP'2715.1 Section 3. The City Council of the City of Temecula as the governing body of the Temecula CSD hereby agrees to the exchange Of prOpCaty tax revenue set forth above and approves this mas~ pa,puty tax agreement with the County. Section 4. The City Clerk shall transmit a ten'rifled copy of this Resolution to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, to the Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission, and to the Riverskle County Auditor pursuant ~o California Revenue and Taxation Code Section APPROVED AND ADOFrED, this day of ,1995. Ron Robere, President ATFF. ST: June S. Greek, City Clerk/Board Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter M. Thorson, General Counsel ORANOE: 27 1 ~. 1 2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) CrrY OF TIU, IEL,'LA) SS I, June S. Greek, City C'I~~ Secreta~ of the Temecula Community Services District, Nl:~h'Ry DO CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. __ was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District on the __ day of 199_ by the following roll call vote. NOES: BOARDlV~'IMBERS: BOARDMEMBERS: June S. Greek, City Clerk/Board Secretary DEPARTM.ENTAL REPORT APPROV CI~Y~:TTORN~/~ R CE OFR R C MANAG CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: Board of Directors PROM: Ronald E. Bradley, General Manager DATE: March 28, 1995 SUBJECT: Departmental Report PREPARED BY: hawn D. Nelson, Director of Community Services Construction has begun on the interim fire station at the Lin~eld Schod site on Paube Road. This project will provide fire protection on the east side of Interstate 15 until the permanent station is competed. Two mobile units will provide housing and office space for a three- person company and one engine. The project is scheduled for completion on March 31,1995. The City anticipates use of the site for 12-16 months at which time the permanent faclty should be operational. On January 24, 1995, the City Council approved the Parkview Site Master Plan. The project will be phased with the first phase being the construction of the permanent fire station on Pauba Road west of Margarita Road. A second phase has been identified as the small retention pond and channel improvements adjacent to the CRC and the large retention basin at the northwest corner of the park. Staff anticipates bidding the second phase prior to the end of this fiscal year and bidding the first phase by mid-August, 1995. The City Council awarded the design contract for the Margarita Park Master Plan to The Alhambra Group on February 14, 1995. Staff is in the process of establishing a project committee to be comprised of City Councilmembers, Commissioners, interested member of the public, the Temecula Valley Unified School District, sports organizations, and staff. The site is a 20 acre parcel on Margarita Road west of Moraga and adjacent to the Temecula Elementary School. The plans for the sports field lighting project at Temecula Middle School have been submitted by the designer to the Department of State Architect. The project will provide lighting for two baseball diamonds, a soccer overlay, the track, and the football field. Staff anticipates the project will be completed and ready for use by Pop Warner by September 1, 1995. Pala Road Park construction is moving forward on schedule with an anticipated completion date of April, 1995. The park will then enter into a 90 day maintenance period with a tentative open date of July, 1995. The park improvements include a restroom/snack bar, parking, tennis courts, basketball courts, soccer field, landscaping, and irrigation. The Rancho California Sports Park Improvement Project is currently being advertised for bid with · bid opening date of March 30, 1995. Staff anticipates the award of a construction contract in April with construction to begin in May, 1995. Development of the 10 acre site will complete the improvements to the northeast corner of the Park at Rsncho Vista and Margarita Roads. The improvements will include perking, picnic facilities, a roller hockey rink, · skateboard facility, restroom/concession building, landscaping and irrigation system. _Plans for Sam Hicks Monument Park have been submitted to the Economic Development Agency to ensure compliance with CDBG requirements. Staff plans on bidding the project in April, 1995. The Temecula Valley Museum has received approved plans for the renovation to St Catherine's Church and should be bidding that project prior to the end of March, 1955. The Planning Commission has also approved the plot plan for the new museum facility to be constructed at the park. The Public Works Department will be working with TCSD end the Museum to ensure coordination between construction efforts on this project. The restroom/snack bar at Kent Hintergardt Memorial Park is ready for final inspection and acceptance, Staff anticipates the facility will be open for public use by the end of March, 1995. Construction of Loma Linda Park Project - Phase II has been completed and the improvements have been accepted after the 90 day maintenance period. The second phase is open to the public and has increased the perk acreage by approximately one acre. The new areas include a tot lot, open play areas, picnic facilities, landscaping and irrigation. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ITEM 1 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FEBRUARY 14, 1995 A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Redevelopmerit Agency was called to order on Tuesday, February 14, 1995, 8:20 P.M., at the Temecula Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California, Chairperson Ronald J. Parks presiding. PRESENT: 5 DIRECTORS: Lindemsns, Mufioz, Perks, Stone, Roberrs ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None Also present were City Manager Ronald Bradley, Assistant City Manager Mary Jane McLarney, City Attorney Peter Thorsen and City Clerk June S. Greek. PUBLIC COMMFNT None CONSENT CALENDAR It was moved by Agency Member Lindemans, seconded by Agency Member Roberrs to approve Consent Calendar as follows: 1. Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of January 24, 1995. The motion carried as follows: AYES: 5 AGENCY MEMBERS: Lindemans, Mufioz, Parks, Stone, Roberrs NOES: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None AGENCY BUSINESS 2. Coooarative Agreement with Old Town Main Street Association Agency Member Stone stepped down due a conflict of interest. Associate Planner David Hogan presented the staff report. CITY OF TI:MPCULA R~:DFVI:I OPMFNT AttFNCY MINUTI:R FFBRUARY 14. 1995 It was moved by Agency Member Mufioz, seconded by Agency Member Lindemens to approve staff recommendation as follows: 2.1 Review and provide direction to staff on the proposed Cooperative Agreement with the Old Town Mainstreet Association; 2.2 Appropriate $75,000 from the RDA Fund Balance to the RDA Economic Development Line Item, Account No. 280-199-999-5264; 2.3 Authorize the Chairman to sign the final agreement with the Association to implement the Main Street Program. The motion carried as follows: AYES: 4 AGENCY MEMBERS: Lindemans, Mufioz, Parks, Roberrs NOES: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: I AGENCY MEMBERS: Stone EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT None AGENCY MEMBER'S REPORTS None ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Agency Member Stone, seconded by Agency Member Lindemans to adjourn at 8:30 P.M. The motion was unanimously carried. The next regular meeting of the City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency will be held on Tuesday, February 28, 1995, 8:00 P.M. at the Temecula Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. ATTEST: Chairperson Ronald J. Parks June S. Greek, City Clerk ITEM 2 APPROVAL CITY ATrORN R~r:~t~ RNANCE OFRC R CITY MANAGE CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Council Ronald E. Bradley, City Manager March 28, 1995 Redevelopment Newsletter RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the appropriation of funds for Redevelopment Newsletter entitled The Grapevine. a second issue of the BACKGROUND: In November, 1994, the City issued the first edition of The GraDevine, newsletter of the Temecula Redevelopment Agency. This publication was developed to keep citizens informed about important issues and projects affecting the City and the Redevelopment Agency. The cost of writing, editing, and copying the first edition totalled ~4,971. This price included the cost of developing the format, layout, and logo of the newsletter. Mailing costs for 20,800 pieces, which were sent to residents and businesses, totaled ~2,050.00, bringing the total cost of the first edition to $7,021.00. The Grapevine was designed to be an ongoing communication medium between the City and the residents. Therefore, staff is recommending that The Grapevine be mailed three times per year, or every four months. The second issue of The Grapevine will again be focusing on the Old Town Entertainment Center Project. Following the public vote, it is important to keep citizens informed and let them know what to expect with the upcoming project construction. This issue will be prepared and sent out in approximately 30 days. The cost of publishing the second edition is $3,423.00. The cost is less than the first edition because the format for The Grapevine is already in place. The mailing costs will remain constant at t2,050, bringing the total cost of the project to ~5,473.00. FISCAL IMPACT: Funding for the newsletter is provided for in the RDA Mid-Year budget request. ITEM 3 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: I~PROVIT. CITY ATTORNEER~~ FINANCE OFFI CITY MANAG TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA REPORT Executive Director/Agency Directors Genie Roberts, Finance Officer March 28, 1995 Review and Approval of the 1994-95 Mid-Year Budgets PREPARED BY: Tim McDermott, Chief Accountant RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. RDA 95- A RESOLUTION OF THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGETS DISCUSSION: Each year a mid-year review is conducted of the Temecula Redevelopment Agency (RDA) operating budgets. The purpose of this review is to conduct an analysis of revenues and expenditures to ensure that the Agency maintains a prudent and healthy fiscal position. The Finance Department staff has performed an analysis of revenues. Additionally, City staff has reviewed the operating budgets and has submitted year-end expenditure projections. Activity in each fund is presented in accordance with the following schedules: Schedule A - Fund Summary: Illustrates activity in terms of the current budget, year- to-date activity as of February 28, 1995, and the recommended mid-year amended budget. Schedule A presents the beginning fund balance, revenues, expenditures, operating transfers, and the projected ending fund balance based upon this activity. Schedule B - Revenue Detail: Illustrates revenue detail by source in terms of the current projections, year-to-date activity as of February 28, 1995, and the mid-year revised projections. Schedule C - Expenditure Summary: Illustrates summaries of expenditures in terms of the current budget, year-to-date activity as of February 28, 1995, and the mid-year revised projections. LOWIMODFRATI: INCONF HOUSINn FUND Based upon the recommended mid-year adjustments, the projected fund balance in the Low/Moderate Income Housing Fund st June 30, 1995 is ~2,203,121, Projected revenues reflect a ~72,486 net decrease from the original budget estimate, This decrease is comprised of the following: Tax Increment - A decrease of ~187,486 is anticipated in the 20% low/moderate income housing set aside. Investment Interest - An increase of ~ 115,000 is projected in investment interest due to higher than anticipated rates of return earned on the Agency's cash and investments. An appropriation increase of ~3,223 is requested in personnel costs. An additional 5% of a Senior Planner's salary costs will be allocated to the Low/Moderate Income Housing Fund due. to the recent adoption of the five year housing plan. CIP FUND Based upon the recommended mid-year adjustments, the projected fund balance in the CIP Fund at June 30, 1995 is ~6,861,352. Projected revenues reflect a 6183,250increase from the original budget estimate. This increase is comprised of the following: Investment Interest - An increase of ~152,000is projected in investment interest due to higher than anticipated rates of return earned on the Agency's cash and investments. Rental Income - An increase of e31,250 is anticipated due to the extended lease agreement with D.L. Reeves on the Jefferson Street property. Appropriation increases totaling $180,664 are requested. Significant adjustments are as follows: Personnel Costs - An increase of $29,628 is requested due to the allocation of an additional 25% of a Senior Planner and 20% of an Associate Planner to the Redevelopment Agency CIP Fund from the City's Planning Department budget. This increased personnel charge is the result of increased redevelopment activities due to the adoption of the AB 1290 Implementation Plan. Election Costs - An appropriation of ~50,000 is requested for the cost of the Old Town Project advisory vote. Sales Tax Reimbursement - An increase of ~52,036 is requested to reflect the anticipated sales tax reimbursement due to Costco of ~ 154,986. This reimbursement is based on the sales tax generated by Costco. Legal Services - A $20,000 increase is requested. 2 Economic Development - A $10,000 increase is requested to continue the Agency's economic development program. 'Other Requested Increases - Dues end Memberships (t500), Postage & Packaging (RDA newsletter e3,000), Consulting Services ($7,500), Other Outside Services (small business loan program ~3,500), Advertising (RDA newsletter ~4,000), Professional Meetings (~500). DEBT SERVIC; FUND Projected revenues in the Debt Service Fund reflect a ~749,942 decrease in tax increment revenue from the originally adopted budget. This results from a decrease in assessed valuation. Projected e~penditures reflect a net decrease of $264,264. This is primarily due to a $265,264 decrease in the budget estimate for passthrough agreements to other local governmental agencies. The decrease in the passthrough agreement amount is directly related' to the corresponding decrease in tax increment revenue discussed above. A $1,286 appropriation increase is requested for the property tax administration fee paid to the County of Riverside. AUTHORIZED POSITIONS The proposed mid-year adjustments will increase the allocation of City authorized personnel to the RDA from 0.6 to 1.1 full time equivalent positions. However, a corresponding decrease in positions is recognized by the City's Planning Department. FISCAL IMPACT: Agency wide, the mid-year adjusted budget results in a net decrease in estimated revenues of $639,178, and a net decrease of ~77,791 in budgeted expenditures. Attachments: Resolution Schedules A through C: -Low/Mod Housing Set Aside Fund -CIP Fund -Debt Service Fund I~Ee, OI,UTION NO. RDA ~- A RESOLUT/ON OF THE TEV/EC~JLA I~EDEV~0PMENT AGENCY AMENDING ~ FISCAL YEAR 1994-9S ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGETS WHEREIS, each year a mid-year review is conducted of all Temecula Redevelopment Agency (P, DA) otwrating budgets. WHEKEAS, the p~ of this review is to conduct an analysis of revenues and expenditures to ensure that the RDA maintains a prudent and healthy fiscal position. WffERF_AS, the mid-year review has been completed and the recommended adjustments are reflected in Schedules A through C of the RDA Low/Moderate Income Housing Set Aside. Fund; the RDA CIP Fund; and the RDA Debt Service Fund. The Board of Directors does hereby resolve as follows: Section 1. That the Fiscal Year 1994.95 RDA Low/Moderate Income Housing Set Aside Fund Annual Operating Budget is hereby mendud in accordance with Schedules A through C. Section 2. That the Fiscal Year 1994-95 RDA CIP Fund Annual Operating Budget is hereby amended in accordance with Schedules A through C. Section 3. That the Fiscal Year 1994.95 RDA Debt Service Fund Annual Operating Budget is hereby amended in accordance with Schedules A through C. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPT!~ this 28th day of March, 1995. ATTEST: Ronald J. Parks, Chairperson 1une S. Greek, Board Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CP,!-~ORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) CITY OF TEidECULA) I FP~,RY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Redevelopm~t Agency at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 28th day of March, 1995, by the following vot~ of the Board of Directors: AGENCY MEMBERS: NOES: AGENCY MEMBERS: ABSENT: AGENCY I~IBERS: June S. C,-reek, Board Secretary SCHEDULE A RBv6fiu8 Expenditures Excess of Revenues Over Expenditures Operating Transfers Increase (decrease) in Fund Balance Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 1994 Est. Fund Balance, June 30, 1995 TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY LOW/MOD BET ASIDE 165 FUND SUMMARY 3,811,273 (2,Tg6,16e) 5,074,9t) 2,278,829 1,492,ea (2,871,878) (2,871,878) 5,074,866 2,203,121 8CHEDIA.EB AQQT NO LOWNOD~/rrASIDEFUND · 4015 -Tax Inccement 4065 I.,/,llb,~l.a Intleelt VARIANCE 1.425,006 820,253 1,237,eGo (187,4N) 140,000 101,927 255.000 1 :l 5,000 TOTAL LOWNOD; ABIDE FUND 17-MIr.05 165 LOWNOD FUND NON DEFT-DEFT 199 -Personnel Services -Operating Expenditures -Operating Expenditures -Capital Expenditures ITOTAL LOW/MOD FUND TEMECtJLA REDEVELOPIIgiT AGENCY LOW/MOD BET ASIDE EXPENDITt. X:IE BUMMARY APPROPRIATION 02/28/95 14,262 102,634 0 4,244,368 4,361,264 16,771 0 3,811,273 FY944t MID-YEAR AMENDED BUDGET 4,244,368 VARIANCE INCREASE ([)ECREASE) ,223 0 0 0 22.6% 0.0'P/ 0.6% · 0.1% 17-Mar-g5 SCHEDULE A Expenditures Excess of Revenues Over Expenditures Operating Transfers (Out) - Increase (decrease) in Fund Balance 9eginning Fund Balm, July 1, 1994 Est. Fund Balm, June 30, 1995 CIP 280FUNDSUMMARY FY94-05 AMENDED BUDGET - 4,320,189 $ 1,921,465 2,396,724 (8,785,931) (6,387,207) $ 13,245,973 6,858,766 4,111,307 734,861 3,376,446 0 3,376,446 $ $ F'Ygq,-G6 YEAR-END PROJECTION 4,503,439 2,102,129 · 2,401,310 (8,785,931) (6,384,621) 13,245,973 6,861,352 17-Mar.-05 8CHEDULEB ACCT NO CIP FUND 4065 .4,,,'eeb,,,e~4 interat 4048 ~ labrest 4068 4j:ari Feel 4072 -.SlJeofPmpety 4075 -.Rental Ineom 4090 -.Operltb~ Trmafe8 in 280 iTOTAL CIP FUND 248,000 218,888 400,000 7,800 4,214 7,800 500 250 500 3.744,368 3.744,3H 3,744,388 140,000 143,589 171,250 179,5~1 0 179,521 I 4.s~o. lael 4.111.s07 I 4,so~.,i3el VANANCE 152,000 · 0 0 sl,ao 0 17-M~-O5 SCHEDULE C 280 CIP FUND -,ION DEPT-DEPT 199 -Operating Expenditure~ -Capital Expenditures Subtotal OPERATING TRANSFER OUT TOTAL CIP FUND TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CIP EXPENDITURE BUMMARY 30,494 761,438 0 1,129,533 1 ,g~21,465 8,755,931 10,707,396 11,013 528,364 0 195,484 734,861 0 734,861 FY94-95 MID-YEAR AMENDED BUDGET 60,122 912,474 0 1,129,533 2,102,129 8,785,g31 10,888,060 VARIANCE INCREASE (DECREASE) 29,628 151,036 0 0 180,664 0 180,664 17-Mar-95 SCHEDULE A DEBT 8ERVK3E 380 FUND BUMMARY FYg4-g5 AMEhDED BUDGET 5.809,57g 1,136,611 0 1,136,611 3,598,391 3,112,713 17-Mar-g5 8CHEDUI. EB NO DEBT SERVICE FUND 4015 -Tex Increment 4065 -investment IntmMt 5.7O0,379 2,481,012 52,780 FYe4,e5 YEAR-END PROJECTION 4,eso,437 loe,2oo VARIANCE I 380 TOTAL DEBT SE_R....V~.E FUND 5,059,837 (74e,e42) 17.Me45 SCHEDULE C 380 DEBT SERVICE FUND NON DEPT-DEPT 1 it -Personnel Services -Operating Expenditura -Operating Expenditures -Capital Expenditures TOTAL DEBT SERVICE FUND TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY DEBT SERVICE EX]:r=NDITURE BUMMARY 0 4,672,968 0 0 0 1,896,496 0 0 FY94-95 MID-YEAR AMENDED BUDGET 0 4,408,704 0 0 VARIANCE INCREASE (DECREASE) 0 (2e4,264) 17..Met-g5 ITEM 4 APPROVAl CITY ATTORNEY V\ TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: Executive Director/Redevelopment Agency Members ,J~Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer March 28, 1995 SUBJECT: Professional Services with Trans-Pacific Consultants for the Design of Phase I of the Western Bypass Corridor PREPARED BY: Raymond A. Casey, Principal Engineer - Land Development John Pourkazemi, Assistant Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the Redevelopment Agency approve and authorize the Chairperson or the authorized representative to execute an agreement between the City and Trans-Pacific Consultants (TPC) to provide civil engineering services for the design of Phase I of the Western Bypass Corridor for an amount not to exceed $451,928.60 and 10% contingency in the amount of $45,192.86. The agreement will be subject to the approval of the Executive Director and the General Counsel as to final form. That the Redevelopment Agency appropriate $167,122 of RDA bond proceeds in the Capital Improvement Program fund for the design of the Western Bypass Corridor Phase I. BACKGROUND: The amount will include a lump sum contract for $365,843,60 for an "at-grade" crossing at Rancho California Road and the Western Bypass Corridor and 10% contingency in the amount of $36,584.36with a provision for the City Manager to approve an additional contract amount of $94,693,50 which includes 10% contingency for the design of a "grade separated" interchange should staff determine that to be most cost effective design alternative. The scope of work for TPC is described in the attached proposal. The Western Bypass Corridor is included in the current Capital Improvement Program. The schedule for the design of the Western Bypass Corridor has been expedited pursuant to T.Z.B.G., Inc. proposal for the Old Town Redevelopment Project. -1 - r:%agdrpt%95%O328%rfp27 .agn FISCAL IMPACT: $330,000 is available in Capital Improvement Program Account No. 210-165-612-5802. Although the disbursement of funds will be spread over Fiscal Year 1994-95 and Fiscal Year 1995-96 within the anticipated budget-amount, it is necessary to approve an additional appropriation of $167,122in Fiscal Year 1995 in order to accommodate the entire contract _amount for the Phase I design. Anticipated appropriations in Fiscal Year 1996 will decrease accordingly. Attachments: 1. TPC Contract -2- r:%agdmt%g5~0328~p27.agn ATTACHMENT NO. 1 Contract PROFESSIONAL SERVICFS ~ This Agreement was made and entered into this 28th day of March, 1995, by and between the City of Temecula {" City"), a municipal corporation, and Trans-Pacific Consultants, Inc,, a California corporation {"Consultant"), III · The parties hereto mutually agree as follows: Services. Consultant shall perform the tasks set forth in Exhibit "A" attached her.to. Consultant shall complete the tasks according to the schedule set forth in Exhibit "A". Performance. Consultant shall at all times, faithfully, industrially and to the best of his ability, experience and talent, perform all tasks described her.in. Payment. The City agrees to pay Cortsultsnt monthly, at the hourly rates set forth in Exhibit "B" attached her.to, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. This amount will not exceed $365,843.60 for the total term of the Agreement unless additional payment is approved by the City Council; provided that the City Manager may approve additional payment not to exceed ten percent (10%) of the Agreement; but in no event more than $10,000. : Consultant will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed. Invoices shall be submitted on or about the first business day of each month, for services provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice. Amendments. This Agreement may be amended so long as such amendment is in writing and agreed upon by both the City Council and Consultant. Ownership of Documents. Upon satisfactory completion of or in the event of termination, suspension or abandonment of this Agreement, all original documents, designs, drawings, and notes prepared in the course of providing the services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission of the Consultant. Termination. The City may terminate this Agreement without cause so long as written notice of intent to terminate is given to Consultant at least three (3) days prior to the termination date. In the event of termination, Consultant shall be paid for the services performed. Indemnification· The Consultant agrees to indemnify and save harmless the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any end all claims, demands, losses, defense cost, or liability of any kind or nature which the City, its officers, agents and employees may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of Consultant's acts or omissions under the terms of this Agreement, excepting only liability arising out of 'the sole negligence of the City. - 1 - r:~027~davids .agrlajp e 10. 11. Status of Consultant. Consultant is an independent contractor in all respects in the performance of this Agreement and shall not be considered an employee of the City for any purpose. No employee benef~s shall be available to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant forJ3erforming services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder, Tqrm. This Agreement shall commence on March 28, 1995, and shall remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than March 28, 1997. Default. In the event that Consultant is in default' for cause under the terms of this: Agreement, the City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work performed after the date of default. Default shall include not performing the tasks described herein to the reasonable satisfaction of the City Manager of the City. Failure by the Consultant to make progress in the performance of work hereunder, if such failure arises out of causes beyond his control, and without fault or negligence of the Consultant, shall not be considered a default. Any disputes regarding performance, default or other matters in dispute between the City and the Consultant arising out of this Agreement or breech thereof, shall be resolved by arbitration. The arbltrator's decision shall be final. Consultant shall select an arbitrator from a list provided by the City of three retired judges of the Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services, Inc. The arbitration hearing shall be conducted according to California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1280, et see. City and Consultant shall share the cost of the arbitration equally. Notices. Notices shall be given pursuant to this Agreement by personal service on the party to be notified, or by written notice upon such party deposited in the custody of the United States Postal Service addressed as follows: City: City of Temecula Attention: Ranaid E. Bradley, City Manager 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 Consultant: Trans-Paci~c Consultants, Inc. Attention: Won S, Yea, President 27447 Enterprise Circle West Temecula, CA 92590-4638 The notices shall be deemed to have been given as of the date of personal service, or three (3) days after the date of deposit of the same in the custody of the United States Postal Service. -2- r:~027~jfdavids.agrlajp 12. Froire Aoreement. This Agreement and any documents or instrument attached hereto or referred to herein integrate all terms and conditions mentioned herein or incidental hereto supersede all negotiations and prior writing in respect to the subject matter hereof. ' ' In the event of conflict between the terms, conditions, or provisions of this Agreement end any such document or instrument, the terms and conditions of this Agreement shall prevail. 13. LiabilitY. Except as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for performing services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder. Consultant agrees to indemnify, release and hold harmless the City, its officers,. agents, employees, and representatives for all claims or losses the City may suffer resulting from any negligent actions or omissions by Consultant. 14. Consultant shall secure workers' compensation insurance. Upon request of Consultant, the City shall add Consultant to the City's workers' compensation policy and the Consultant shall reimburse the City for the cost of said insurance premiums. ; Licenses. Consultant and subconsultant shall obtain all necessary licenses, including but not limited to, City Business Licenses. The parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date and year above written. CONSULTANT CITY OF TEMECULA By: By Ronald Ho Parks, Chairman APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk -3- r:~027~jfdavids.agrlajP FXHIBIT 'A' TASKS TO BE PERFORMED r:%O27~jfdevida.agrlejp IV. SCOPE OF WORK AND ENGINE~'S APPROACit TO TIlE PROJECT. "~ SCOPE OF WORK: o Task 1 ENGINEER will provide Aerial Topographical Mapping for the Western Bypa~ Corridor fi'om Interstate 15 to the intersection of Western Bypass Corridor and Rancho California Road. o Task 2 ENGINEER w~l final{Te current alignment and constraints study including some exploratory work necessary to determine the potential utility conflicts (assuming $10,000 for research and exploratory work). o Task 3 o Task 4 o Task 5 o Task 6 o Task 7 ENGINEER will prepare a 1" = 100' scale preliminary grading and improvement plans. ENGINEER w~l provide agency permit processing, excluding any environmental assessments. ENGINEER will prepare and process final 1" = 40' scale grading and improvement plans, including associated fight-of- way documents. ENGINEER will prepare and process final 1" = 5' scale bfid~ plans. ENGINEER will prepare bid documents and specifications. o Task 8 ENGINEER w~l prepare Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) documents and process to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) for approval. ENGINEER'S APPROACH TO THE PROJECT 1. Site Description Phase I - Western Bypass Corridor is classified as a Secondary Highway with a proposed alignment commencing from Rancho California Road running southerly crossing Murrieta Creek via a proposed bridge and terminating at the Interstate 15 and Highway 79 South Interchange. Vincent Moraga Drive is an existing roadway with a 66 foot fight-of-way commencing from Rancho California Road running southerly and terminating at Ridge Park Drive in a knuckle configuration. Vincent Moraga Drive will be extended from Ridge Park Drive in a southwesterly alignment to intersect the Western Bypass Corridor. Improvements will be required at the new Vincent Moraga Drive and Ridge Park Drive intersection. Front Street, south of Santiago Road, is an existing roadway classified as a Major Highway and is presently a straight roadway connection into Highway 79 South. Front Street will be realigned to intersect the Western Bypass Corridor. The Riverside County Assessment District No. 159 is currently in the process of ~nalizing the plans for the Interstate 15/Highway 79 Interchange improvements which will require extensive coordination with both the County of Riverside and the State of California Department of Transportation. Existing fire hydrants, air vacs, water meters, manholes and above-ground utility junctions indicate that underground facilities exists along Vincent Moraga Drive, Front Street, and Rancho Cnli{~ornia Road. Several drainage courses traverse the proposed Western Bypass Corridor alignment and will require close coordination with the appropriate jurisdictional agencies. 2. Basic Understanding and Assnmptions It is our understanding that the City of Temecula (CITY) is proposing to construct Phase I - Western Bypass Corridor, extend the improvements of Vincent Moraga Drive and realign Front Street of which both streets w~l intersect the Western Bypass Corridor. The proposed improvements are located along the southwestern boundary of the CITY and will be constructed with asphalt concrete and the necessary subbase. The Western Bypass Corridor will be improved with a seventy-eight (78) foot wide roadway and approximately 2.4 miles in length. Vincent Moraga Drive wffi be extended and will be a forty-four (44) foot wide roadway apprcr, clmately 0.4 mile in length. Front Street will be aligned to intersect the Western Bypass Corridor and will be an eighty (80) foot wide roadway. Two alignment alternatives for the Western Bypass Corridor intersection with Ranch California Road will be provided. The first alternative will be an at- IV.2 grade intersection, and the second alternative is a grade separate intersection. The improvements will also consist of grading, storm dram, installation, bridge construction, including the necessary channel improvements, tr~fflc signal installation, roadway signing and striping, traffic control and detouring, sediment and erosion control measures, relocation of underground and aboveground utility facilities as well as demolition and reloca~on of existing landscaping, irrigation lines and fences, existing pavement re-construction and restoration and A.C. overlays. All erosion control measures will be provided with non-irrigated methodology. All available existing plans and documents necessary for design, preparation of contract plans and construction will be obtained. A blueline stream crossing the proposed alignment has bccn identified on the U.S.G.S. 7.5 minute Tcmecula Quadrangle. Permits and agreements (1601, 401, 404) will be applied for and processed through the Federal and State Regulatory Agencies. The intersection of the Western Bypass Corridor with I15/SH 79 South will require significant coordination with the County of Riverside's Assessment District 159 (AD 159) and the California Department of Transportation. Since we are the design engineer for the AD 159, we are in an excellent position to eliminate or mitigate potential and significant design conflicts. Hydrology report and hydraulic calculations wfll be provided to support th,""'. storm drain facilities proposed for the project. A HEC-2 analysis associate with the bridge crossing at Murrieta Creek will be provided to determine the vertical alignment and allowable freeboard for the proposed bridge. ENGINEER will provide new aerial topographic mapping. This will also enable us to identify accurately limits of grading impacts to the adjacent properties. Field survey support will also be provided as necessary to verify the vertical and horizontal alignments of the existing roadways affected by the Project. Slope easements, drainage easements, legal descriptions, letters of agreement between the CITY and adjacent property owners and all necessary maps and documents w~l be provided for the construction of the proposed improvements outside the right-of-way. The design parameters wfll be based on the "~restern Bypass Corridor Alignment Study" dated August, 1992 prepared by NBS/Lowry and LSA Associates and recommendations made in the Western Specific Plan and associated Environmental Impact Report which is assumed to be available during the preliminary design stages. Due to grading and paving activities, a gcotcchnical investigation with grading and construction rcconnncndations covering the identified limits of the project will bc provided to ensure that the proposed. improvements arc constructed to Standard Specifications and/or as required by the CITY. Relocation d any existing facilities will require extensive i:oordination with the appropriate agencies. Notification in writing of any reloca~on to these agencies w~l be provided along with additional field surveys and site visits to locate all existing facffities to ensure no obstruction and conflicts occur during the construction stages. It is our understanding that all utility design will be done by others and is not part of this proposal. On August 20, 1992, the State Water Resources Control Board adopted the National Pollutant Discharge l~.liminntion System (NPDES) State Gcncral Construction Permit Order No. 92-08-DWQ (Permit). The Permit was adopted to establish discharge requirements for storm water runoff associated with construction activity. The NPDES Permit requires that a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan :(SWPPP) be developed and a Notice of Intent (NOD be submitted to the State Water Resources Control Board for the proposed project. Street improvement plans, grading plans, bridge plans, storm drain plans, traffic signal plans and all relevant plans necessary for the construction of the project will be provided and processed through the CITY and the appropriate agencies for approval. Metric system shall be incorporated into all plans, specifications and related documents as per the C1TY's standards. Bid schedule, detailed engineer's estimate, bid specification package including bidders' instruction, bid sheets, general specifications, special provisions and technical specifications using the CITY's boiler plate contract documents and all other pertinent contract documents necessary for the construction of the proposed project will be provided. Bid administration wffi be provided by the CITY. It is our understanding that all fees required by other public agencies for their application processes, project review and permit issuance will be paid by the CITY. Construction staking is not a part of this proposal. City will be respons~le for all reproduction. 3. Task No. 1 Approach ° Field Survey and Aerial Topography Survey twelve aerial targets using Global Positional Systems (GPS) and conventional techniques tied to the local state plane coordinate system. Perform aerial topography and provide digital topographic mapping at 1 inch -- 40 foot scale with 1 foot contour interval and 500 foot wide along those portions of the Western Bypass Corridor from its intcrscction with Rancho California Road to Interstate 15. Task No. 2 Approach ° Obtain Existing Approved Plans and Documents for Design Reference and Verification of Existing Right-of-Way and Easements Street Plans and Right-of-Way documents: o Obtain improvement plans for Vincent Moraga Drive. o Obtain improvement plans for Front Street west of Interstate 1 and Highway 79 Interchange. Obtain improvement plans for the Riverside County Assessment District No. 159 Interstate 15 and Highway 79 South Interchange Improvements. o Obtain improvement plans for Rancho C, alifomia Road. Obtain preliminary design plans for the First Street Extension from the City of Temecula. Obtain recorded maps of Parcel Map 12549, Parcel Map 18254, Parcel Map 19626-1, Parcel Map 19626-2, Parcel Map 23968, Parcel Map 23969, Parcel Map 18254, Parcel Map 21592, Parcel Map 10814, Parcel Map 4559, Parcel Map 8248, Parcel Map 17288, Parcel Map 20090, Parcel Map 21690, Parcel Map 22515, and Tract No. 4807 adjacent to the proposed horizontal alignment of the Project. ° Storm Drain Plans and Hydrology Reports IV.5 ° Obtain all available storm drain phns and hydrology information including maps, studies and topographic maps to determine and evaluate the drainage areas tributary to Project and the surrounding properties. Sewer and Water Plans Obtnin water plans along Front Street, Vincent ]v[oraga Drive Ridge Park Drive and Rancho California Road from the appropriate agency to verify existing waterlines and its appurtenances impacting the proposed vertical and horizontal alignment of the Project. Obtain sewer and related plans along Front Street, Vincent Moraga Drive and Ridge Park Drive from the appropriate agencies to verify potential conflicts by the proposed project to the existing sewer system of the adjacent properties. Dry U ty Plans Obtain gas plans, electric plans, telephone plans, and cable T.V. plans and related information senring the surrounding properties from appropriate agencies and purveyors. Environmental Documents Obtain a copy of the CITY's Environmental Assessment for the project. ° Alignment and constraints study. Field survey the vertical and horizontal alignments of the existing surface improvements along Rancho California Road, Vincent Moraga Road, Ridge Park Drive, and Front Street, existing driveways, all existing aboveground appurtenances, overhead facilities, existing storm drain facilities, fences, trees, shrubs and all poss~le obstruction to the proposed project. Pothole to locate existing Metropolitan Water District Aqueduct, Rancho California water and Southern California Gas main. Provide a 100 and 40 foot scale computerized hard copy of the project with existing street centerlines, right-of-way, new and existing aerial topographic overlay, field survey and research information necessary for preliminary and final design. Finalize the current alignment and constraints study showing adjacent land ownership information. 5. Task No. 3 Approach o Prepare a 1"--100' scale "engineered~, preliminary grading and improvement plan. Using the Final Alignment Study, prepare a 1"--100' scale preliminary Street Improvement Plan incorporating the recommendations made in the %Vestern Specific Plan" and associated Environmental Impact Report in order to meet the required design and feasible parameters of the proposed project. Using the preliminary Improvcmcnt Plan, prepare a 1"--100' scale prclirnlnary Grading Plan to evaluate the grading impacts to the adjacent properties. Using the preliminary Grading Plan, providc a prcllminary earthwork analysis to determine if a balanced project can be accomplished. ° Prepare a preliminary Engineer's Estimate. Coordinate and process the preliminary design for approval wi~ City Staff. o Preliminary Bridge Plans Review all pertinent background and supporting site data for the design of the structure. ° Conduct a field review of the bridge site. Conduct bridge type selection and prepare the Structure General Plan and General Plan Estimate. Bridge type selection will involve determination of the following characteristics of the structure: Span layout and span lengths. Superstructure type. Substructure and foundation types. Railing and lighting requirement. Architectural/Aesthetic treatments. The bridge General Plan drawing will show structure plan, elevation, typical section and structure type. This drawing will become the first sheet of the bridge plans and wfll be used for communication and coordination purposes. From the General Plan drawing, the General Plan Estimate will be prepared. This will serve to establish the structure's construction cost for budgeting purposes early in the project. Prepare bridge-related text for the Preliminary Engineering Report. Preliminary Storm Drain Plan and Hydrology Study Using the pre'hminary Street Improvement and Grading Plan, perform a preliminary hydrology study to determine the impacts of drainage runoff both to the proposed project and the surrounding properties. Based on the preliminary hydrology study, prepare a preliminary Storm Drain Plan and provide a preliminary hydraulic. calculation to determine the pipe sizes necessary to accommodate the drainage flows tributary to the project. Adjust the preliminary plans as necessary to ensure proper design coordination. Coordinate and process the preliminary pl_a_ns and study with City Staff and the appropriate agencies for approval. Utility Coordination. Evaluate the design impacts of the proposed improvements with the existing improvements such as fences, landscaping and irrigation systems, aboveground and underground facilities including appurtenances. Verify, determine and coordinate all poss~le relocations and obstructions of the existing facilities with the adjacent property owners, City of Temecula, County of Riverside, California Department of Transportation, General Telephone, Southern California Gas Company, Inland Valley Cablevision, Southern California Edison, Rancho C~lifornia ° Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation ° Background Research Review available documents and reports pertaining to the geotechnical conditions of the site and immediate vicinity. Applicable information provided by government agencies including the California Division of Mines and Geology and United States Geologic Survey vail also be reviewed and incorporated into our report. F._~_mination and interpretation of stereoscopic aerial photographs will be used to supplement our field geologic mapping and identify potential geologic constraints including unstable slopes, faulting~ and adverse bedding or fracture patterns. o Geologic Mapping o Detailed geologic mapping of the proposed road alignment will be performed to evaluate the existing geologic conditions in relation to the proposed road improvements- ° Project Set-up ° Schedule field work for the project including setting up seisnn surveys, dozer work, drffi rigs, and backhoe. Notify Underground Alert and ff necessary meet on-site with the various underground utility companies. Rippability Investigation Field - Performance of two-way seismic traverses in the areas of deep cuts for the proposed roadways in order to determine rippability characteristic of the underlying bedrock materials. Office - Calculate the thickness and seismic velocities in feet/second for the varying layers of earth materials underlying the subject site. Prepare a graph detailing the thickness of individual layers, estimated depth of the layer, velocity of the unit, rippability characteristic, and thickness of proposed cuts. ° Subsurface Exploration ° Subsurface exploration will be conducted along the proposed road alignments to evaluate the existing soil conditions and coilca in-situ and bulk soil samples for laboratory testing. The objective of our subsurface exploration is to accurately define critical s6il properties in regard to the proposed road improvements. This may include moisture/density relationships, hydro-consolidation, alluvial removals, and shear strength. Our subsurface exploration will be conducted utilizing a truck mounted drill rig or backhoe, depending upon field conditions andproposed improvements. Subsurface exploration will include excavation, logging, soil sampling and badefilling of borings and trenches. Pavement deflection testing or coring w~l be conducted in areas of existing pavement to determine the structural integrity of the existing section and design overlays where applicable. Laboratory Testing Laboratory testing w~l be conducted on representative soil samples to determine the engineering parameters of the on-site material. Laboratory testing will include, but is not limited to the foilowing: * Sieve Analysis * Mwrimum Density * Direct Shear * Soft Qassification * Sand Equivalent * R-Value * Consolidation * In-situ Moisture/Density Engineering Analysis Engineering analysis will be the evaluation of data collected during the field investigation in relation to the proposed improvements. The analysis will include, at a minimum, pavement structural section design, evaluation of liquefaction potential, discussion of seismicity and strong groundsbaking, slope stability for large cut or fill slopes, and evaluation of soil conditions relative to the proposed road improvements. We will also evaluate the limited existing pavement and design overlays where appropriate. ° Fault Anatpis & R~'~view Review available reports and literature pertaining to the location of the Elsinore Fault Zone (W~domar) in conjunction with the proposed roadways. Utilize backhoe to confirm or negate faults present within proposed roadway including identifying potential hazards such as fault related springs, and · out of slope bedding of fault features. Slope Stability Analysis o To evaluate the stability of proposed cut/fill slopes constructed to maximum design height, we will utilize a computer program enti~ed PCSTABLS, created by Purdue University. This program automatically searches for the potential arcuate failure su~aces using Bishop's method of calculatiop-, considering site specific soft parameters. The computer program automatically searches for critical failure surface considering angle of internal friction, cohesion intercept, wet density, and pore pressures, where applicable. Report Preparation ° A separate geotechnical report will be compiled for each of th~ road semnents. The report w~l provide a summaxy of our findingsTconclusions, and recommendations for planning, design, and construction of the proposed road improvements ~om the geotechnical standpoint. 6. Task No. 4 Approach ENGINEER will provide the following agency permit application and processing services, excluding any environmental assessments: Prepare and process an application for a Section 404 Nationwide Permit with the U.S. Army Corp of Engineers. Prepare and process an application for a 1601/1603 Strenmbed Alteration Agreement with the California Department of Fish and Game. Prepare and process a 401 Water Quality Certification or waiver thereof with the Regional Water Quality Control Board. ° Prepare and process an encroachment permit from the California Department of Transportation for the proposed work within the State rights of way. 7. Task No. 5 Approach ° Final Street and Grading Plans Based on the preliminary design, finalize the design in preparation of the contract plans. If rcquircct, metric system information wffi be incorporated in the contract plans per City of Temecula standards. Prepare Title and Index sheets to CITY approved standard and formal Prepare an ink mylar Street Improvement Plan and Profile using 44)' horizontal and 4' vertical scalc~ The improvement plans wffi show the screened aerial topography in the background and all pertinent engineering information necessary for the construction of the project. Using the 443' scale Street Improvement Plans, show the necessary slope grading and daylight lines necessary for the construction of the project. Prepare offsite grading plans necessary for drainage purposes. Process and coordinate the street and grading plans for approval to the City of Temecula. Upon approval of the Street Improvement Plans, Grading Plans and other pertinent plans, prepare a detailed Engineer's estimate for roadway excavation, embavkTnent, overexcavation 'and re-compaction including shrinkage and bulking f~ctors, roadway base come, A.C. pavement, A.C. dike, A.C. overlays, demolition and re-construction of existing improvements, landscaping and irrigation systems, rclocation of existing aboveground and underground facilities and all other pertinent items necessary for the construction bid documents. ° Final Storm Drain Plnns and Hydrology Analysis Using the preliminary store drain plans, ~nsll-e the design in preparation of the contract plans. Metric system information will be incorporated in the contract plans per City of Temecula standards. Prepare and process Storm Drain plans using 40' horizontal and a 4' vertical scale for approval to the city of Temecula or to the appropriate agencies as required. Provide a final Hydrology Study Report. Perform hydraulic calculations and HEC-2 analysis to support the installation of the proposed storm drain facilities and the bridge overcrossing. Process and coordinate with City Staff and the appropriate agencies for approval. Upon approval of the Storm Drain Plans, prepare a detailed Engineer's estimate for storm drain pipes, inlets and all pertinent items necessary for the construction bid documents. Storm Water Pollution and Prevention Plan o Prepare and process a Notice of Intent to the State Ware Resources Control Board. Prepare and process an Erosion and Sediment Control Plan for approval to the City of Temecula. Upon approval of the plans, prepare a detailed Engineer's estimate for all pertinent items necessary for the construction bid documents. Final Traffic Signal Plans Attend meetings to discuss the signal design. One meeting ~ be held with the design team to verif~ the design criteria and review the basic preliminary plan. One meeting will be with the City of Temecttla Traffic Engineer to discuss plan check. Submit one set of reproduc~le vellums to be reproduced as necessary for each plan check to the City of Temecula. Upon receipt of final approval from the CITY, one set of mylars will be submitted for inclusion in the final construction document package for the City of Tcmccula. Prepare a detailed Engineer's Estimate for all pertinent items necessary for the construction bid documents ° Final Signing and Striping Plans Attend meetings to discuss the signing and striping design. One meeting will be held with the design team to verify the design criteria and review the basic preliminary plan. One meeting will be with the City of Temecula Traffic Engineer to discuss plan check. Submit one set of reproduc~le vellums to be reproduced as necessary for each plan check to the City of Tcmccula. Upon receipt of final approval from the CITY, one set of mylars will be submitted for inclusion in the final construction document package for the City of Temecula. Prepare a detailed Engineer's Estimate for all pertinent items necessary for the construction bid documents. Final Traffic Control and Detour Plans Prepare and process Traffic Control and Detour Plans to City of Tcmccula and the appropriate agencies as required. Obtain all necessary encroachment permits as required for the project. Prepared detailed Engineer's Estimate for all pertinent items as necessary for the construction bid documents. Street Rights-of-way, Slope Easements, Drainage Easements, Legal Descriptions and Letter of Agreements Obtain lot book reports from a title company necessary for the processing and recordation of the right-of-way and casements plats. Prepare and process the necessary Plats and Legal Descriptions for street right-of-way purposes to the City of Tcmecula or the appropriate agency as required. Prepare and process the necc.ssary Easement Plats and Legal Descriptions for slope purposes to the City of Tcmccula or the appropriate agency as required for recordation. ° Prepare and process the necessary Easement Plats and Le~ ~ Descriptions for drainage purposes to the City of Temecula ~, the appropriate agency as required for recordation. ° Prepare and coordinate the necessary Letters of Agreement for permission to grade on private properties between the City of Temecula and the affected property owners. 8. Task No. 6 Approach Final Bridge Plans 0 Final bridge design and plans will be prepared in accordance with all relevant Calm project development and bridge design documents. Structure plans will be prepared using Intergraph Microstation CAD software. Metric system information will be incorporated in the plans as required by the City of Temecula. Industry standard computer programs w:dl be used to expedite the design where appropriate. The bridge engineer has maintained a complete Hbrary of Caltran's approved brid[/'~''''~ design software with metric capabilities. Structural special provisions will be prepared using current Caltrans Standard Special Provisions compiled, edited and supplemented to suit this project- The engineer's estimate Will be prepared by a detailed quantity take-off of all the usual items of work on the structure. Quantities arc independently checked and back-checked within accepted tolerances. Partial pay, final pay and specialty items will be identified. The design and plans will be independenfiy checked and back- checked in accordance with Caltran's requirements. Upon approval of the bridge PS&E package, the resident engineer's file will be submitted. This will include a four-scale of the deck contours plot and the deck joint movement calculation sheets. ° The bridge engineer will assist City staff With Contractor inquiries and preparation of contract addencla during the bidding period. 9. Task No. 7 Approach Preparation of Construction Bid Documents Compile all approved street improvement plans, grading plans, bridge plans, signing & striping plans, storm drain plans, erosion and sediment control plans and all other pertinent plans necessary for construction of the proposed project. Compile all recorded street right-of-way and easement documents, letters of agreement, state and federal permits and all environmental documents required for the construction of the proposed project. ° Prepare a list of contract items necessary for the contract documents. Incorporate the soils engineers report and recommendations into the contract plans and specifications. Prepare a schedule to determine the construction duration and sequence of work required for the project. Using the City of Temecula's boiler phte contract documents, prepare a bid specification package to include bidders' instruction, bid sheets, general specifications, special provisions and technical specifications. Metric system information will be included in the contract documents as required by the City of Temecula. Coordinate the final bid package and specifications with City of Temecula staff. Review the construction bids and provide recommendations, Coordinate with City of Temecula staff the results of the bidding process. Attend pre-construc~on meetings and provide response to all questions or concerns that may arise during the construction stages. 10. Task No. 8 Approach Prepare and proce~ Conditional Letter of Map Revision Research and compile all available existing hydrologic and hydraulic analysis, records and in_formations. Provide now hydraulic (HEC-2) calculation and report for existing conditions using the design FEMA Q100 provided by the CITY. Prepare 100' scale exlu'bit to show existing topography, cross-sections and the calculated floodplain limits. Reflect the calculated floodplain limits on the current Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) and provide comparison results with the floodplain limits as shown on the current FIRM. Provide now hydraulic (I-IEC-2) calculation and report for proposed conditions (with the proposed bridges along the Western Bypass and First Street) using the design FEMA Q100 provided by the CITY. Prepare 100' scale exln'bit to show proposed bridge locations, cross- sections and the calculated floodplain limits. ~" Reflect the calculated floodplain limits on the current FIRM and provide comparison results with the ~oodplnin limits Of the existing conditions. Prepare the necessary forms and applications based upon the new forms released on October 1992 by FEMA, Coordinate with the appropriate agencies and process to FEMA for the CLOMR approval. Provide reponses to FEMA comments and coorcljnat~ the appropriate agencies. IV. 17 EXHIBIT "B" PAYMENT SCHEDULE r:%O27~jfdavids.agrlajp Trsns-r c c HOURLY RATE SCm~BUL~. as of January 4, 1994 JOB CLASSIFICATION Director/Principal Engineer Senior Engineer ~soclatz Engineer Kssistam Engineer Principal Plsnner Senior Planner Associate Planner Assistant Planner Graphic Artist Assistant Graphic Artist Senior Designer A~*te (CADD) Designer Assistant Designer Senior Delineator Assistant Delineator Messenger Principal Surveyor Survey / Two-Man Crew Survey / Three-Man Crew Senior Surveyor Associate Surveyor' Assistant Surveyor Chief. of-Party Instrument Man Chninn~n Survey Technician Associate Computer Engineer OTHER SERVICES & EXPENSES Traveling Blueprints Mileage Outside Services/Special Consultants Expert Witness (4 hour minimum): Court and Deposition Preparation HOURLY RATE 55.00 55.00 50.00 45.130 45.00 35.00 25.00 100.00 135.00 175.00 90.00 75.00 70.00 70.00 30.00 1.O0/sheet 35/m11¢ Cost +15% 200.00 150.00 27.i-i7 FjIterprise Circle West Temecula, Ca 92590 lISA Tel. (~)9) 676 - Fax (909) 69-i - NOTE: Payments are due 30 days from date of invoice. A late payment finance charge of 1.5% per month will be appHe ~ to any balances which are unpaid after 30 days. Geotechnical & Environmental Engineers, Inc. GEOTE4~INIG4L FEE SCHEDULE EFFEO71VEJANUARY ~ge~ Sieve ~ (+~ or 4) .......................................................... F%-a~aton Index ............................................................... P, Vmlue ...................................................................... Sulfatm ...................................................................... Co. odvNy .................................................................... Pe.,,~:-~x~ty failing or Constant Heed) .............................................. CompmMion Temm - Concrm Cy#nden ............................................. ~ Tatm . Hot Mix Amphm~ ...................................... ~ ............ Specmcemay-SolandAgamgmBMe ............................................. Stmbay mnd Air Void~ - H~ A~ AmphM ............................................... Mix Dedgn - Hot Mix Asphelt mnd Concmte ............................................ $ esUnltPt~, in coilecb~l any ddinquent mccount will be pmid by ere clienL An ovw'Nme c~ d 33.3% d hourly rmt'd will be mdded for #me in ex~eB d S hourB Per daY (erJudtng aO ~ ~ ~ 7..OO m.m. mnd elter S p. m. or an Seturdays. An ovefewe cl'4qle d SO~ wel be ~ for a~ne in ex~m d12 houm Pef dl~ mnd 27463 Enccrpt/sc Circle V~tcsc - Temccu/a · CA 92590 . TEL ( 909 ) 676. 8337 · FAX ( 909 ) 676. 4583 MAR BRIDGE .DRAFTSPERSON.....; .....,...:...: ...............: ......; ................,,, ......:...: ......$55.00 'Hourly. charges lndude,provi~.'on'fo.~'.norrnal. ob ove~eed ~sts, sud; as .c~me rental,. ubTbS, · insurance, cleficel'~ewices, equipment,:normal supplies. and mabrial, tn-h, ouse reproductbn ':serves end'!oce/ tiavel c~fS, . 'C~her eXper~es such .as spee. ial consubn~s or.purches'eri. ou~side ." services will be b///ed,-at 'c~t plus :10 percent. ..... . · .....:. ,.,. . ..., . , ,. .. ', ,. ,. ,. ..., ,'; ":. '.': ,...:+ , · ..+. ,+ .... . . ':." , · Z5 '595 ]0:33 PAGE.002 FEE 5{:H=DUL[: o HOURLY E'hl l IN(,; RA rb.S AND i-hi I ~r,;G GRAD[-- Grade 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 A B C D E F Rate I O.T. $50 $55 $60 $65 $70 $75 $80 $85 $95 $100 $105 $110 $115 $120 $125 $130 $135 $140 $35 / $52.50 $40 1 $60 $45 / $67.50 $50 / $75 $55 $60 ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS DescdpUon Engineering/Planning Analyst Associate Engineer/Planner EngineeriRanner EngineedPlanner Engineer/planner Engineer/Planner, Project Engineer/planner Project Engineer/Planner : Project Engineer/Planner Senior Engineer/Planner, Project Manager Senior Engineer/Planner, Project Manager Senior Engineer/Planner, Project Manager Senior Engineer/Planner, Project Manager Senior Project Manager, Senior Engineer/Planner Senior Project manager, Senior Engineer/Planner Senior Project Manager, Senior Engineer/Planner Deputy Office Manager, Senior Project Manager Branch Manager. Chief Engineer, Department Manager Regional Manager, Corporate Vice President President. Regional Manager TECHNICIANS AND SUPPORT STAFF Jr. Drafter/Technician, Clerk/Analyst Drafterrrechnician. Clerk/Analyst Drafter/Technician, Production Coordinator, Word Processor CAD Drafter, Engineering Technician, Administrator, Supervisor CAD Drafter, Engineering Technician, Administrator, Supervisor Senior CAD/Graphics DraftedDesigner, Controller MAR 15 '95 9:59 909 884 2~77 PAGE.00~ FbJz 5c;H[-.i]UI_E - H~jUF-H Y BiII ~NC, RAI FS ANU [3~1 ~ ING GRADF DFSCf,:LP T;ON5 H $70 I $75 l Senior CAD/Graphics Drafter/Designer, Controller TECHNICIANS AND SUPPORT STAFF (CONlaD) Senior CAD/Graphics DraWer/Designer Senior CAD/Graphics DraftedDesigner Grade descriptions and classifications subject to change (Effective 02/01/93). Per $12 Hour Computer I CADD Time Project expenses will be billed at cost plus 10 percent for service and handling. Project expenses include project-related costs such as transportation, mileage {~ $.30 per mile, subsistence, reproduction, and subcontractor services. Each project may be ~ubject to initial set up and coordination fees. Invoices are due and payable within 30 days after being sent. Rates am subject to change (Effective 04/01/94). PoSt-it-* Fax Note To ('i,,.,,.,,,.,/ F~x # 7671 MAR 15 ' 95 9: 58 909 884 227? PAGE. 881 ITEM 5 Msrch 20, 1995 Mr. W.A. Caldwell As stated in the MOU, the City/ASm~ will coolx~atc with T.Z.B.G., Inc. in their eftore m oblsin finsnt~.g and to tensrosa the project. Please be assured that we will use our best eftotis ~o provide Fluor Daniel with the ;~-~is~,nnce and infotrp~dan they may requixe to perform due diligence on the proj~*t alld to ~ out their l~porlsibi]iti~ with ~ to finsn~ng and We look forward to a positive working relatiop-~hip with T.Z.B.G., Inc. and Fluor Daniel, Inc. on this e~clting projea. Sincerely, Ro d Snd City Mzns~er ~ APPROVAl ER~ CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFI F( CITY MANAG CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Council/Redevelopment Agency Ronald E. Bradley, Executive Director March 28, 1995 Informational Report T.Z.B.G., Inc. and Fluor Daniel, Inc. RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. BACKGROUND: On February 28, 1995,T.Z.B.G., Inc. entered into a Memorandum of Understanding with Fluor Daniel Inc. in order to obtain assistance in financing and construction of the proposed Old Town Entertainment Project. Fluor Daniel, Inc. is a highly experienced and successful construction management firm which we are delighted to learn will be working with T.Z.B.G. on this important ~oject. Attached for your review is a copy of correspondence sent to Fluor Daniel, Inc. which describes the City/Agency obligations under the Memorandum of Understanding with T.Z.B. G., Inc., and indicates our intention to cooperate fully during the due diligence process that will be undertaken between Fluor and T.Z.B.G. Jeffrey E. Stone Ma}g)r Karel F. Unclemans Ma~jor Pro Tern J. Sal Mu~oz Councilmember W.A. Caldwen Fluor Daniel, Inc. 100 Fluor Daniel Drive Greenville, SC 296(Y7-2762 Ronald J. Parks Counc|lmember Ronald H. Robercs Councilmember {909) 6946444 FAX 1909) 694-1999 We are delighte~ to hear that Fluor Daniel will be assisting T.Z.B.G., Inc. with the ~n.nclng and construction of the Entea~ninment Project proposed to be constructed in Old Town Temeaxla. The City of Temecula and its Redevelopment Agency have committed to assist T.Z.B.G., Inc. with the pwject in the manner described in the attached Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) executed by T.Z.B.G., Inc. and the City/Agency on January 31, 1995. Generally, the MOU pwvides that the City and Agency will be responsible for financing an estimated $11.6 million of public improvements to support the Enter~inment Project. Public improvement costs will be financed by tax increment, assessment district and general fund revenue sources. It is our hten~on, subject to the required selection procedure that public agencies must follow, to request that T.Z.B.G., Inc. and a construction management firm take responsibility for the conslzuc~on of these public improvements in order to achieve cost efficiencles and assure coordination between construction projects. The City/Agency has also agreed to assist T.Z.B.G., Inc. with the financing of the entertainment facilities through the use of conduit financing. The conditions under which conduit financing would be considered require that no existing revenue of the City or the Agency nor the full faith and credit of the City or the Agency would be obligated or pledged for the payment of fln~ncing for the entertniqment facilities. However, the City has agreed to consider the use of new revenues generated specifically by the Enter~inrnent Project including sales tax, transient occupancy taxes and a "ticket tax" paid by visitors to the project. The public revenues, if any, that would be applied to debt service payments will be limited to revenues specifically generated by the Entertahment Project.