HomeMy WebLinkAbout032895 CC Agendato · meet§nO will enable the City to make reasonable I ¥i~6e. rents to ensure access/lilly to that
meeting [28 CFR 36.102.36.104ADA Td~e II]
AP--FNnA
TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
A REGULAR MEETING
COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER
30875 RANCHO VISTA ROAD
MARCH 28, 1995- 6:30 PM
5:00 PM * Closed Seedon of the CIty Councg pursuant to Govenvnent'~(~de Secdons:..~ ......
1. i s49ss.e, CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGO+IATbR, PropertY:~ A iI.esI9~ is.:
Parcd Number 922-023-020,8 City owned die located on Rrst and From Street; Negotiating"
pardes: City of Temecula and Edward and KathJeen Doole: Under negotiation: pdca and terms
of payment.
· ,/
2. § 54956.8, CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR, Proparty: R~nchO"'West'"
Apartments, 42200 Main Street, Negotiating Pardes: Tamecuts Redevelopment Agency and
Resolution Trust Corporation (RTC); Under negotiation: pdce and terms of payment. . . "
3. 954956.9(b), Claim of City against Rancho Core Assodates !.
At approximately 9:45 PM, the City Council will determine which of the remaining
agenda items can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00 PM and may
continue all other items on which additional time is required until a future meeting.
All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 PM.
CALL TO ORDER:
Mayor Jeffrey Stone presiding
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. 95-07
Resolution: No. 95-.~5
invocation:
Reverend Marty Edwards, The Lamb's Fellowship
Flag Salute:
Mayor Pro 'Tem Lindemans
ROLL CALL:
I.indemans, Mufioz, Parks, Robarts, Stone
PRESENTATIONS/
PROCLAMATIONS
Presentation of California Parks and Recreation Society
Facility Design Award of Excellence
California Architecture Week 1995 - Proclamation
Homebuyer Education Month - Proclamation
PUBUC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Council on
items that are not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited
to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council on an item not listed on the
Agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink 'Request to Speak' form should be filled out
and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other agenda items s "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk
before the Council gets to that item. There is · five (5) minute time limit for individual
speakers.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made at
this time. A total, not to exceed, ten (10) minutes will be devoted to these reports.
CONSENT CALENDAR
2
Standard Ordinance Adoption Procedure
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in
the agenda.
Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve the minutes of February 14, 1995.
3
4
5
Resolution Aonrovinn Iist of hemands
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 95-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING
CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
Public Nuisance Abatement- 30301 Nicolas Road
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Set a public hearing for April 25, 1995 at 7:00 PM. at 30875 Rancho Vista Road,
for the purpose of confirming the cost to the City for the abatement of · public
nuisance at 30301 Nicolas Road.
Professional Services Contract Renewal for Video Production Services
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 Approve the professional services contract with Davlin for audio/video production
services.
6
Records Destruction Reauest
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1 Approve scheduled destruction of certain records as provided under the City of
Temecula approved Records Retention Policy.
Resolution Declarina Results of March 7.1995 Flection
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 95-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, RECITING
THE FACT OF THE SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ADVISORY ELECTION HELD ON MARCH
7, 1995, DECLARING THE RESULT AND SUCH OTHER MATTERS AS PROVIDED
BY LAW
8
Contract Change Order No. I for 94-95 Slurrv Reel Project. Pro'mct No. PW94-1 ~
RECOMMENDATION:
8.1 Approve Contract Change Order No. I for materials, labor and equipment for
various items of work in the amount of 810,721.30.
9
10
11
12
Contract Chanae Order No. I for FY94-95 Citywide P.C.C, Repair Prooram. Project No.
PW94-13
RECOMMENDATION:
9.1 Approve Contract Change Order No. I for materials, labor and equipment for
various items of work in the amount of 88,067.53.
"No Parking" 7one on Marnarita Road from Rancho Vista Road to Pauba Road from 6:00
AM to 4:00 PM Weekdays
RECOMMENDATION:
10. 1 Adopt a r~solution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 95-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ESTABLISHING 'NO PARKING' ZONE ON MARGARITA ROAD FROM RANCHO
VISTA ROAD TO PAUBA ROAD FROM 6:00 A.M. TO 4:00 P.M. WEEKDAYS
Parcel MaD No. 28084- Hold Harmless Apreement
RECOMMENDATION:
11.1 Approve the Hold Harmless Agreement with BA Properties, Inc.
11.2 Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the agreement.
Plannino Aoolication No. PA94-01 ~0 end PA94-0121
RECOMMENDATION:
12.1 Approve the Partial Termination of Development Agreement No. 90-1 and authorize
the Mayor to execute the Agreement.
13
14
15
Acceotmnce of I~.blic Rtreett into the City Maintained-Street System {v~r~t~in Trmct No.
~1760}
RECOMMENDATION:
13.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 95-.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBUC STREETS INTO THE CITY
MAINTAINED-STREET SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACT NO. 21760)
Acceotance of Public Street into the City Maintained Street System (Butterfield Staae Road
from Rancho Califomia Road to De Portola Road)
RECOMMENDATION:
14.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 95-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREET CONSTRUCTED UNDER
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 159 INTO THE CITY MAINTAINED-STREET SYSTEM
(BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD FROM RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD TO DE PORTOLA
ROAD)
Acceotance of Public Street into the Citv Maintained Street System (Portions of R|rtterfield
Staoe Road and De Portola Road)
RECOMMENDATION:
15.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 95-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREET CONSTRUCTED UNDER
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 159 INTO THE CITY MAINTAINED-STREET SYSTEM
(BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD FROM DE PORTOLA ROAD TO STATE HIGHWAY
79|S) AND DE PORTOLA ROAD FROM BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD TO EASTERLY
CITY LIMITS)
It.V_ Lk'~l,llll ·
16
17
18
Acceotance of FN,blic Rtreet into the r-;tv Meinteined-~q:Vet Ryetam (J'~e port, as Rhed -
Marn.,*rite Road to Rutterfield StaGe Road)
RECOMMENDATION:
16.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 95-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBUC STREET CONSTRUCTED UNDER
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 159 INTO THE CITY MAINTAINED-STREET SYSTEM
(DE PORTOLA ROAD FROM MARGARITA ROAD TO BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD)
Accent Public Imorovements in Tract No. ~1760
RECOMMENDATION:
17.1 Accept the public improvements in Tract No. 21760;
17.2 Authorize reduction Faithful Performance Bond amounts for streets, water and
sewer improvements, accept the Faithful Performance Warranty Bond in the
reduced amount;
17.3 Direct the City Clerk to so notify the Developer and Surety.
Contract Amendment- Kicak and Associates
RECOMMENDATION:
18.1 Approve an amendment to the Kicak and Associates contract.
SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES
19
Second Reading of Ordinance No. 95-06
RECOMMENDATION:
19.1 Read by title only an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 95-06
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA REPEALING
SECTION 6.04.010 AND ADDING CHAPTERS 6.02, 6.06 AND 6.08 TO THE
TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE REGULATING THE KEEPING AND CONTROL OF
DOGS, CATS AND OTHER ANIMALS
P-OUNel
20
21
22
23
;u raiNFee
Reo-est to S:jooort the State of I~-wlifornia Wildlife Conservation Floard Acnuisition of the
Hidden Valley Ranch
RECOMMENDATION:
20.1 Receive report and provide direction to staff to draft a letter of support for the
Mayor's signature.
Winchester 1 800 Soecific Plan
RECOMMENDATION:
21.1 Provide direction to staff to prepare City's official response to the Board of
Supervisors April 11, 1995 hearing regarding Winchester 1800 Specific Ran.
Status Reoort on Klassic Shot2 Billiards. Planning Aoolication No. PA 94-0043
RECOMMENDATION:
22.1 Receive and file report.
Consideration of Adoption of Resolution AnDroving a Master Progerry Tax Exchanne
Agreement Between the City of Temecula and the Countv of Riverside Uoon Anney~tions
of Territory to the City
RECOMMENDATION:
23.1 Adopt a resolution emitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 95-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE MASTER PROPERTY TAX TRANSFER AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE UPON
ANNEXATIONS OF TERRITORY TO THE CITY
24
Consideration of a Contract with DMn to Analyze Water and Sewer Imoact Fees
RECOMMENDATION:
24, 1 Consider amending the contract with David M. Griffith and Associates (DMG) to
conduct a Water and Sewer Impact Fee Review,
&~eeweo22eN 7
25
26
27
28
29
Disc~ ,-~e;on of Installation of Rashina Wamina Uahts in the Vicinity of Sparkman --,
Temec-l- Elementarv Schools. Temecula Valley Hioh School and Mamarite Middle ~-~AQSd
(Requested by Mayor Stone - discussion Item Only)
Overland nrive Overcrossing - Status Reoort
RECOMMENDATION:
26.1 Review the status report, discuss and provide direction to staff as appropriBte.
Street Maintenance and/or Construction of Unpaved Streets
RECOMMENDATION:
27.1 Review the alternatives presented end provide direction to staff.
Communitv Services Fundin0 Prooram
RECOMMENDATIONS:
28.1 Consider the recommendations for the Community Services Funding Grants for FY
1994/95.
Third Amendment to the Fire Protection Aoreement for Fiscal Year 1994~95
RECOMMENDATION:
29.1 Approve the Third Amendment of the Cooperative Agreement to Provide Fire
Protection, Fire Prevention, Rescue and Medical Aid for the City of Temecula.
30
City Council Meeting Start Time
RECOMMENDATION:
30.1 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 95-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING
CHAPTER 2.04 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO THE TIME
AND PLACE OF CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS
31
niscussion of Traffic Policeman Directina Traffic at Winchester and Jefferson nl ~ing Pexk
Traffic Times of 4-6 PM
(Oral discussion placed on the agenda by Mayor Stone)
DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: April 11, 1995, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho
Vista Road, Temecula, California.
.TrMFCUI x COMMUNITY SqIVICI:S 'DISTRICT MrrrlNn - fro be held at 8~0).
Next in Orderi
Ordinance No. CSD 95-01
Resolution No. CSD 99-09
CALL TO ORDER: President Ronald H. Roberrs
ROLL CALL: DIRECTORS: Lindemans, Mufioz, Parks, Stone, Roberts
PUBLIC COMMENT: Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors, should present a
completed pink 'Request to Speak' to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come
forward and state vour name and address for the record.
CONSENT CALENDAR
I Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of February 14, 1995.
2
Parkview Site Imorovement Project - Phase I and Phase II
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve Amendment No. 2 of $28,425 to the design contract with RJM Design
Group, Inc. for Phase I and Phase II of the Parkview Site Improvement Project.
2.2 Appropriate $27,625 from Public Facilities - Development Impact Fees to the Capital
Projects Account.
R.-v~lml~oa~e~ 1o
DISTRICT BUSINESS
3
Considemtio~ of Adootion of Resolution Aoorovinn the Mester Prooertv Tax Fxchenne
Agreement Retween Riverside Ceetv and the Temec-l* Comm-nitv Rentices nistrict
Regarding Pronerty Sutiject to Annexation
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
'RESOLUTION NO. CSD95-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY
SERVICES DISTRICT, APPROVING THE MASTER PROPERTY TAX TRANSFER
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AND
THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE UPON ANNEXATIONS OF TERRITORY TO THE
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
GENERAL MANAGERS REPORT - Bradley
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT - Nelson
BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT: Next meeting: April 11, 1995, 8:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875
Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California.
R..U._ '-~'12111 11
TI:MFCULA RFDFVFLOPMq~IT A'G~ICY MFFTINI3
Next in Order:
Ordinance No. RDA 95-07
Resolution No. RDA 95-O1
CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Ronald J. Parks presiding
ROLL CALL: AGENCY MEMBERS: Lindemans, Mufioz, Roberrs, Stone, Parks
PUBLIC COMMENT: Anyone wishing to address the Agency, should present a completed pink ·
'Request to Speak" to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please
come forward and state your name and address for the record.
CONSENT CALENDAR
I Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of February 14, 1995.
2 Redeveloement Newsletter
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve the appropriation of funds for a second issue of the Redevelopment
Newsletter entitled The Graoevine.
3 Review and Aooroval of the 1994-95 Mid-Year Bud{iets
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 95-
A RESOLUTION OF THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AMENDING THE
FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGETS
AGENCY BUSINESS
4
5
Professional Services with Trans-Paci~c Consultants for Design of Phase I of the Western
Rvoass Corridor
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1
Approve and authorize the Chairperson or the authorized representative to execute
an agreement between the City and Trana-Pacific Consultants ('rPC) to provide civil
engineering services for the design of Phase I of the Wastam Bypass Corridor for an
amount not to exceed ;451,928.60 and 10% contingency in the amount of
;45,192.86. The agreement will be subject to the approval of the Executive
Director and the General Counsel as to final form.
4.2
Appropriate; 167,122 of RDA bond proceeds in the Capital Improvement Program
fund for the design of the Western Bypass Corridor Phase I.
Informational Reoort - T.7.B.~-.. Inc. and Fluor Daniel. Inc.
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 Receive and file report.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
AGENCY MEMBER'$ REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT: Next Meeting:
Temecula, California.
April 11, 1995, 8:00 PM, 30875 Rancho Vista Road,
PROCLAMATIONS/
PRESENTATIONS
The City of Temecula
PROCLAMATION
WHs:ql?-&tl, for.the vast majority Of~C-lifi~d~n% owning a ~ iS Imt of ~
AmeriCan dremn; and
WH m'-:t';'-A.~, Califomia's ~wue.,ship ~ of 56.8 hnf short of th~ :-,don.at rate of
~,.Sperm~ and
WUi;gEAS, in recent years, the major obstacle to achieving the Ameri~n dream of
owning a home has been a shortage of affordable housing, dlmcxdty in obtaining a large
downpayment and finding an affordable home loan program, and lack of unders~ing about ..
Wlfiml~-AR, today's inlet. st rates, affordable homes fin~nelng ~, and lower
housingpdces make the dream of home ownenhip ~le for tens of thousands of Califomia
renters; and
Vat.my-AS, the California Homebuyer Education Parmership seeks to provide
education and training to assist homebuyers in general, and tint-time, minority, and low-to-
moderate income homebuyen in particular;
NOW, TRI~REFORE, I, Jef~y E. Stone, on behalf of the City Council of the City of
Temecula, hereby proclaim April, 1995 m be
*Horn.buyer Education Month'
IN WITNESS W~F, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City
of Temecula to be affi~ this 28th day of March, 1995.
~une S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk
The Cily of Temecula
PROCLAMATION
undamadiag of, such i,~Oo~hat jutins as mimic safety, growth managemint, ,-'cem*bRity for
people with dighnid,.a, hLqoric geamva~_.aa, mergy cemezvalio~ hOV,,in_~ for the homeless,
W~EREAS, The .annedc~ Tn~nne of Az~tec% California Counu'l (AIACC), in
reprf.,u, ating ~rchitet~ ~ld the BreMtec~ff~l lltOff. tqiO~ in Caljf(Rnia, has wm'k~ in concert with
government's regulation of their indtmt~es; and
NOW, Tmm~"ORE, I, ~eff~ E. Stone, on behalf of the City Councn of the City of
Temecula, hereby proclaim week of March 26 through April 1, 1995 ID be
".,au. rhitectnre Week in Temecub"
IN WITNESS wBJae~OF, I have hereunto set my hand and mused the Seal of the City
of Temecula to be afTRed this 28th day of March, 1995.
***
7emey E. Sumc, Mayor
~une S. Greek, cMC, City
ITEM 1
ITEM 2
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
FEBRUARY 14, 1995
A regular meeting of the Temecula City Council was called to order Tuesday, February 14, 1995,
7:00 P.M., at the City of Temecula Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road,
Temecula, California, Mayor Jeffrey Stone presiding.
PRESENT: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Lindemans, Mufioz, Parks, Roberts, Stone
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Also present were City Manager Ronald Bradley, Assistant City Manager Mary Jane McLarney,
City Attorney Peter Thorsen and City Clerk June S. Greek.
INVOCATION
Assistant Pastor Derek Thomas, Rancho Temecula Valley Church, led the invocation.
FLAG SALUTE
Councilmember Roberrs led the flag salute.
PRESENTATIONS/
PROCLAMATIONS
Mayor Stone proclaimed the following as:
* February 19 through February 25, 1995, National Engineer's Week.
* February 18 and 19, 1995, Rod Run Days.
* May 1995, White House Conference on Aging Month.
A Certificate of Special Achievement was presented to Barbara Affolter for being appointed as
representative to the California Senior Legislature.
A Certificate of Appreciation was presented to Captain Rick Sayre, Temecula's First Chief of
Police.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Samuel Scott, Community Music School, 41125 Winchester Road, Suite B1, Temecula,
introduced the Community Music School programs to the' City Council and asked for the City's
support in establishing a School of Arts in the City of Temecula.
Joseph Terrazas, 31160 Lahontan Court, Temecula, apologized to staff for his behavior st a
previous City Council meeting and asked for a clarification on conduit financing.
It41tCC
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 0~/1419B
Theresa McLeod, 42200 Main Street, #F128, Temecula, asked if Zev Buffman would be providing
a performance bond on the Entertainment Project. Ms. McLeod asked if the bond payments will
be deferred during construction.
City Manager Ron Bradley explained the bonds will be paid once the project is operating.
Mayor Storm said there was a request to continue Item No. 6 - School Mitigation Program
Resolution for two weeks. The City Attorney confirmed the Council could move to continue Item
No. 6 for two weeks prior to any other Council action.
Councilmember Mufioz and Councilmember Parks stepped down due to a conflict of interest.
It was moved by Councilmember Robarts, seconded by Mayor Pro Tam Lindemans to continue the
School Mitigation Program Resolution for two weeks.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES:
3 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Lindemsns, Roberts, Stone
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 0
CO UNCI LMEMBERS: None
COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSTAIN: 2 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Muftoz, Parks
Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans requested staff investigate scheduling a joint meeting of the City
Council and the Riverside County Board of Supervisors.
Mayor Stone requested staff schedule a future workshop on the mitigation fees currently levied by
various agencies.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Councilmember Roberts asked for a status report on the Capital Improvement Projects.
Councilmember Robarts said he has heard concerns expressed that the Capital Improvement
Projects are being placed on hold until the outcome of the Old Town Entertainment Project
election.
Director of Public Works Joe Kicak explained that no CIP projects are being placed on hold st this
time. He said the only project which may be affected will be the Western Bypass Corridor which
is on its own schedule.
Mayor Stone asked the status of the interim signals for Highway 79 South and La Paz; Pale Road;
and Margarita Road.
/~' CITY COUNCIl MINUTFS 0~/14195
Director Kicak said staff has received proposals and will be presenting those at the next City
Council meeting for the interim improvements,
Mayor Stone advised that he is available every Tuesday at City Hall to discuss concerns with
residents, Mayor Stone said he will look at possibly scheduling a monthly open forum for the
community to come and discuss issues and concerns,
Mayor Stone re-opened the Public Comment portion of the meeting to allow the following
comments:
Bonnie Corbin, Marcedes and Third Street, Temecula, expressed concerns about the zoning on her
property. Ms. Corbin said the zoning limits the uses on the property.
CONSENT CALF:NDAR
It was moved by Mayor Pro Tern Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember Parks to approve
Consent Calendar Items 1 - 4.
The motion was carried as follows:
AYES: 5
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Lindemans, Mui~oz, Parks, Robarts, Stone
None
None
the agenda.
2. Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1
2.2
3. Resolution Aoorovino List of Demands
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
Approve the minutes of January 17, 1995.
Approve the minutes of January 24, 1995.
Standard Ordinance Adootion Procedure
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 0~/14195 ~
RESOLUTION NO. 95-10
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING
CERTNN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
City Treasurer's Reoort
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Receive and file the City Treasurer's Report as of December 31, 1994.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
e
Abatement of Hazardous Vegetation from Vacant Lots or Parcels oar Ordinance 91-18.
Chaoter 6.16
Building Official Tony Elmo presented the staff report.
Mayor Stone opened the public hearing at 7:50 P.M.
Bonnie Corbin, Marc.des Street, Temecula, said she received a weed abatement notice end
was working to clear her properties however, the City of Temecula Public Works
department made improvements to the culvert on her property and they have not restored
her property to its original condition.
City Manager Ron Bradley responded that staff will work with Ms. Corbin to resolve the
problem.
It was moved by Mayor Pro Tam Lind.mane, seconded by Councilmember Robarts to
approve staff recommendation as follows:
5.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 95-11
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ORDERING CONFIRMATION OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AGAINST
PARCELS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR COSTS OF
ABATEMENT AND REMOVAL OF HAZARDOUS VEGETATION
The motion carried as follows:
AYES:
5 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Lindemans, Muttoz, Parks, Robarts, Stone
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
~4ei~c 4 m
CITY P-OUNCIL MINUT;S
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Mayor Stone declared · recess at 7:55 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 8:30 P.M.
COUNCIL BUSINESS
0~11 4195
ADDointment to the Old Town Temecula Historical Preservation District Local Review Board
Mayor Stone stepped down due to a conflict of interest.
City Clerk June S. Greek presented the staff report.
Councilmember Parks said he nominated Bill Harker for the position because Mr. Harker has
been on the advisory board for many years and he feels the continuity is necessary at this
time.
Councilmember Mufioz said he is recommending Cathleen Kreus be appointed because he
feels it is beneficial to encourage new ideas.
It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Robarts to appoint
Bill Harker to serve the unexpired term on the Old Town Local Review Board.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Lindemsns, Parks, Muf~oz, Robarts
NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSTAIN: I COUNCILMEMBERS: Stone
e
Interim Fire Station Proiect
Community Services Director Shawn Nelson presented the staff report.
It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember Parks to
approve staff recommendation as follows:
8.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 95-12
CITY COUNCIL MINUlq:S 0~114/'95
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING A LEASE WITH UNFIELD SCHOOL FOR THE TEMPORARY FIRE
STATION SITE
8.2
8.3
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 95-13
ARESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING A LEASE WITH MOBILE MODULAR. MANAGEMENT
CORPORATION FOR MODULAR UNITS TO BE UTILIZED AT THE
TEMPORARY FIRE STATION
Appropriate $35,000 from Development Impact Fees (Fire Mitigation Fees) to
provide equipment for the new fire engine at the Interim Fire Station.
The motion was carried as follows:
AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 0
Lindemens, Muf~oz, Parks,
Robarts, Stone
COUNCILMEMBERS: None
COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Discussion of Imoacts of the Winchester 1800 Soecific Plan #286
Planning Director Gary Thornhill advised staff has information on this project and staff's
response to the E.I.R. were submitted to the City Clerk. Director Thornhill said after
hearing the plan, the Riverside County Planning Commission recommended denial and took
no action on the E.I.R. He said the County Board of Supervisors referred the project back
to staff with concerns relating to densities and design.
Councilmember Muf~oz said he feels staff time should be provided to review these types of
projects. He also expressed concern about the cumulative impacts large specific plans,
which are in the City's sphere of influence, will have the city ultimately.
Cheri Fresonke, 32571 Ga!leano, Winchester, said she is against the proposed project.
Ms. Fresonke said the children who live in the area now, all go to Temecula schools and
she understands the developer is providing the land for schools however, is not funding
any schools.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 09/14195
Bill LaForge, 32523 Galleano, Winchester, expressed his opposition to the plan.
Adrianna McGregor, 34555 Madua del Plays, Temecula, proxy for Dean McGregor,
expressed concerns relating to the impacts of the project.
James Moropoulos, 32515 Buena Venture Road, Temecula, expressed concerns regarding
the project's impacts.
Adrianna McGregor, proxy for Robert Wheeler, 24280 Washington Avenue, Murrieta,
expressed opposition to the proposed project. Mr. Wheeler prepared a statement asking
staff to review the cumulative impacts of the project.
Adrianna McGregor, 34555 Madua del Plays, Temecula, expressed opposition to the
project.
Councilmember Perks said he supports budgeting of staff time for evaluation of these
projects.
Councilmember Robarts said he would like to review the staff report from the Riverside
County Board of Supervisors.
The overall consensus of the Council was to direct staff to prepare a letter to the Riverside
County Board of Supervisors, for the Mayor's signature, requesting that consideration of
Specific Plan #286 be continued to allow the City of Temecula opportunity to prepare their
comments.
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
None
CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT
Closed Session report: Council took action to refer the claim of Charles Miller to the City's Claims
Administrator Carl Warren and Company
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Councilmember Roberrs, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans to adjourn at
9:35 P.M. The motion was unanimously carried.
The next meeting of the Temecula City Council will be held on Tuesday, February 21, 1995, 7:00
PM, Economic Development Workshop, City Hall Main Conference Room, 43174 Business Park
Drive, Temecula, California.
~4ILCC 7
CITY ~tiUNCII MINUTI:S 0~114195 ~.
The next meeting of the Temecule City Council will be held on Monday, February 27, 1995, 7:00
PM, Joint City Council/Planning Commission, City Hall Main Conference Room, 43174 Business-
Park Drive, Temecule, California.
The next regular meeting of the Temecula City Council will be held on Tuesday, February 28, -.
1995, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California.
Mayor Jeffrey Stone
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
ITEM 3
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA ATJOVi/ING CERTAIN .CIAI1VIS AND
DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN ~:xHsRIT A
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES I~-~OLVF,,
DETERMII~ AND ORDER AS FOIJ-0WS:
Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A have been
audited by the City .Manager, and that the same are hereby allowed in the amount of
1,041,~44.34.
Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 28th day of March, 1995.
ATI'EST:
Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk, CMC
i~1ol54 I
STATE OF CAL~:~ORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do certify that the
foregoing Resolution No. 9~- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the
City of Temecula on the 28th day of March, 1995 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: 0
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 0
COUNTERS: None
COUNTERS: None
COUNCH,MEMBERS: None
June S. Greek, City Clerk, CMC
CITY OF TEMECULA
LIST OF DEMANDS
03/09/95 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
0311 6/95 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
03/28/95 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
03/08/95 TOTAL PAYROLL:
TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 03/28/95 COUNCIL MEETING:
DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND:
CHECKS: F
031 GENERAL
103 GAS TAX
120 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FUND
140 COMMUNFrY DEV BLOCK GRANT
165 RDA-I.C)VV/MOD
190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ (CIP)
220 MARGARITA ROAD REIMB. DIST.
250 CAPITAL PROJECTS - TCSD
280 RDA-CIP
300 INSURANCE
310 VEHICLES
320 INFORMATIONS SYSTEMS
330 SUPPORT SERVICES
340 FACILITIES
380 RDA-DEBT SERVICE
390 TCSD DEBT SERVICE
PAYROLL:
001 GENERAL
1 O0 GAS TAX
165 RDA-LOW/MOD
190 TCSD
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
280 RDA-CIP
303 INSURANCE
320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS
330 SUPPORT SERVICES
340 FACILITIES
TOTAL BY FUND:
RONALD E. BRADLEY, CITY MANAGER
$ 217,406.81
103,54,9.41
600,614.35
115,173.77
$ 1 ;041,744.34
456,443.88
103,660.83
0.00
0.00
1,4,97.76
36,543.08
4,613.60
414.S3
4,482.88
0.03
286,744.52
0.00
0.00
6,584.26
0.00
9,411.22
1,91 5.41
4,941.44
0.03
2,628.56
71,760.58
14,942.90
621.27
20,044.51
464.01
949.4,9
1,80~.95
732.61
235.93
1,547.13
684.17
1,981.22
$ 926,570.57
115,173.77
$ 1,041,744.34
, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
VOUCHItEZ
0)/0~/~
15:08
CITY OF TB4ECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
100 GAS TAX FUll
165 RDA DEV- LOM/14OD SET ASIDE
1~0 (:~II4UNITY SERVICES DZSTRiCT
191 TCSO SERVICE LEVEL A
1~2 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
1F3 TCSD SERV]CE LEVEL C
210 CAPITAL ]I4PROVB4ENT PROJ FUND
280 REDEVELOPHENT AGENCY - C]P
300 INSURANCE FUND
320 INFORI4ATION SYSTENS
330 SUPPORT SERVICES
360 FAC]LITIES
TOTAL
107, 127.66
65,955.75
497.76
22,49~
4,496.72
414.33
2,326.69
600. O0
323.76
1,578.80
5,675.66
1,476.00
4,8~1
217,4~0~.81
15:08
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK' VEIIX3R VENDOR
NIMBER DATE MIllER IIANE
443489 03/(~/95 000283 FIRSTAX(IRS)
/~348~ 03/0~/95 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS)
4434~ 03/0~/~5 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS)
~ 03/09/95 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS)
Z~3489 03/09/95 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS}
~43/e8~ 03/09/95 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS)
4~3/,8~ 03/09/~5 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS}
~4:~8~ 03/0~/95 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS)
44:~89 03/09/95 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS)
443/,89 03/0~/95 00028~ FIRSTAX (IRS)
443~89 03/09/95 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS~
443~89 03/09/95 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS)
4/,3/e89 03/09/95 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS)
~4~,89 03/09/95 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS)
443~,89 03/09/95 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS)
443489 03/09/95 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS)
443489 03/09/~5 000283 FIRSTAX ([RS)
44348~ 03/0~/~5 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS)
443~89 03/09/f5 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS)
443Z~89 03/0~/95 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS)
03/0~/95 00028~ FIRSTAX (IRS)
03/09/95 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS)
6 03/0~/~5 000283 FIRSTAX (IRS)
443489 03/09/95 000283 FIRSTAX (ZRS)
462451 03/09/95 000/4~4 FIRSTAX (EDD)
462~51 03/09/95 00~ FIRSTAX CEDD)
462451 03/09/95 000~ FIRSTAX (EOD)
~62451 03/09/95 OOO~ FIRSTAX (EDD)
z~2451 03/09/95 00044A FIRSTAX (EDD)
462451 03/09/95 OOL~ FIRSTAX (EDD)
462451 03/09/95 OOe~ FIRSTAX (EDD)
462451 03/09/95 OOO~ FIRSTAX (EDD)
462451 03/09/95 O004AA FIRSTAX (EOD)
462451 03/09/95 O00~AA FIRSTAX (EDD)
/.62/,51 03/09/95 OOE~ FIRSTAX (EDD)
~62451 03/09/95 O00z~4 FIRSTAX (EDD)
~2451 03/09/95 O004Z~ FIRSTAX (EDD)
46245103/0~/95 0004/~ FIRSTAX (EDD)
462451 03/09/95 O00Z~4 FIRSTAX (EDD)
462451 03/09/95 00~ FIRSTAX (EDD)
/,62451 03/0~/95 _O~v_.-~ FIRSTAX (El)D)
462451 03/0~/95' 00~ FIRSTAX (EDD)
2259~ 03109195 000680 A N S - T N S
2259~ 03109195 000680 A M S - T M S
2259~ 03109195 000680 A 14 S - T N S
2259/, 03/09/95 000680 A 14 S - T N S
2259~ 03/09/95 000680 A 14 S - T N S
~ 03/09/95 000680 AMS-TNS
03/09/95 000680 A M S - T H S
Cl~( OF ~CIAA
VOUCHER/CHECK RfiGIMBt
FOR ALL PBtlO~S
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAl.
0002.83 FEDERAL
000203 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
00028:5 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 lIED ! CARE
000283 MEDICARE
00028~ MED I CARE
O002lG MED ! CARE
000283 FlED I CARE
000283 M~D 1 CARE
00028:5 lIED I CARE
00028.5 MED 1 CARE
0002K5 MED I CARE
00028~ MEO I CARE
O004z~ SOl
O004J~ SOl
000,(4~ EDI
O00(P~ STATE
O004J~ STATE
00(0~ STATE
000/,/~ STATE
~ STATE
~ ~ATE
~ STATE
O~ STATE
~ STATE
~ STATE
00~ STATE
00~ STATE
~T OF ~1-1~ P/R IN J~
~ OF ~I-1ST P/R IN J~
~T ~ ~I-1ST P/R IN J~
POSTAGE ACCGJNT
POSTAGE ACCOUNT
POSTAGE ACCOUNT
POSTAGE ACCOUNT
POSTAGE ACCOUNT
POSTAGE AC_r~a__,qT
POSTAGE ACCOUNT
A_CC~__NT
MIMBER
'300-2070
320-2070
330-2070
340-2070
001-2070
100-2070
165-2070
1~0-2070
191-2070
192-2070
1~3-2070
280-2070
300-2070
320-2070
330-2070-~
340-2070-
001-2070
100-2070
1~0-2070
001-2070
100-2070
165-2070
1~0-2070
191-2070
192-2070
1~-2070
280-2070
300-2070
320-2070
330-2070
34e-2o70
ool -2070
10o-2070
oo1-10o::;-5230
ool - 110'-';-5230
oo1-12o-;-52~o
ool - 1~.-;-523o
001-160~f~j~-5230
001-150-~-5230
001-161-~-5230
ITE~
NIX jilT
10,519.16
2,293.47
78.18
2,516.17
69.60
21.00
213.80
45.54
18.50
108.74
118.~
2,~51.52
535.36
21.31
17.70
13.38
64,10
17,80
7.f3
57,96
23,9Z
64,32
28.85
8.95
32.38
2,r'/3.6~
592.07
17.57
55o.18
16.75
2.96
45.87
9.34
5.03
20.08
13.6~
25.81 -
1L01 -
26.~-
13.22
179.50
~46.03
457.18
1,304.95
233.09
422.63
PAGE 1
CHECK
N40UNT
20,/,20.92
6,113.86
VIXJCHERI
CHECK
NIJHBER
22595
22595
22595
22595
22595
22595
22595
22595
22595
22595
22595
22595
22595
22595
225~6
22597
22597
22598
22599
225c~
22600
22600
22602
22603
22604
22606
22604
22606
2260,r,
2260~
22605
226O6
22606
22606
15:08
CBECK
DATE
~/~/95
~/~/95
~/~/95
03/09/95
03/O9195
03/09/95
03/09/95
03/09/95
031099195
03109195
03109195
03/09/95
03/09/95
03/09/95
03/O9/95
03/09/95
03109195
mR
OOO68O
0OO68O
OOO68O
OOQ116
000116
QOQ116
OO0116
000116
000116
0(0116
OOQ116
OO0116
000116
0O0116
000116
OO0116
OO0116
000101
001323
001323
001886
001721
001721
001721
000679
00067~
001201
001021
000131
OOQ131
OO0131
QOQ131
OO0131
000131
Q00135
OO01/O
0O0160
0OO160
M
ARS-TRS
AHS-THS
ANS-TNS
AVPVZSZONP~S
AVPVZSIONPLANS
AVPVISIONPLANS
AVPVISIONPLANS
AVPVISIONPLANS
AVPVISIONPLANS
AVPVISIONPLANS
AVPVISIONPIJUIS
AVPVISIONPLANS
AVPVISIOHPLANS
AVPVZSIONPI,MIS
AVPVISIONPIJUtS
AVPVISIONPLANS
AVPVISIONPLANS
APPLE ONE, INC.
ARRONHEAD HATER, INC.
ARRONHEAD HATER, INC.
BARCLAYS AMERICAN NTG.
BASELINE SOFTHARE, INC.
BASELINE SOFTHARE, INC.
BASELINE SOFTHARE, INC.
BOGRAPHICS PRINTING PLU
BOGRAPHICS PRINTING PLU
BUSINESS MEEK
C A P P O, INC.
CALIFORNIA GANG INVEST]
CARL WARREN &CO., INC.
CARL kVLRREN &CO., INC.
CARL UARREN & CO,, INC.
CARL BARREN & CO., INC.
CARL MARREN & CO., INC.
CARL WARREN & CO., INC.
CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER
COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN
COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN
CO(.ONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN
CITY OF ~
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL palOOs
ITEH
DESCRIPTION
POSTAGE ACCOUMT
POSTAGE ACCQUMT
POSTAGE ACCOUNT
000116 AVP
000116 AVP REVE
000116 AVP
000116 AVP
000116 AVP
000116 AVP
000116 AVP
000116 AVP
000116 AVP
000116 AVP
000116 AVP
000116 AVP COBIt
O00116 AVP DED
OVRPHT ON HARCH 95 STATEMENT
TEMP HELP VIE 2/23 KLUKAS
BOTTLE HATER FOR CITY HALL
BOTTLE HATER O CITY YARD
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
INFONIqATION SECURITY POLICIES
FREIGHT
TAX
RECEIPT BOOKS FOR RECREATION
TAX
RENEWAL-STARTING 6195-51 ISSUE
PURCN ASSOC.3/1/95-2/28/96
CO NF:OLrrLAW MOTOR SANG 3/~-31
08102/92 INTZIGER, LINDA
1116/93 NURRIETA CREEK FLOODIN
02/11/93 STATE FANN/J. HNeION
1/16/93 INDIAN OAKS, LTD.
12/1/93 MRIGHT, AleREW
2/19/9~ RICHTER, SANDEA L.
K ~T W/BASE FOR STREET 14AINT
OO01/0 600ALS
000160 600A&S
000160 CANCElt
ACCOUNT
mR
lOO-166-606-5230
320-199-999-5230
lOO-199C)
001-2310
001-2310
001-2310' .'
100-2310 -
165-2310.
lOO-2310
191-2310
193-2310
280-2310
:500-2310
340-2310
001-1180
001-2310
001-2310
001-160-999-5118
340-199-999-5260
100-166-601-5260
001-2030
320-
320-109-9(j'~-5228
320-109-;-5228
lOO- 180'999-5301
lOO- 180:999'5301
001 ' 110-999'5228
001-160-999-5226
001-170-999-5261
300-199-999-5205
3OO- 109-999-5205
3OO- 199-999-5205
300-199-999-5205
300-199-999-5205
:500-199-999-5205
100-16~-601-52A4
001-2330
190-2330
001-2330
ITBI
A!4OUNT
158.0~
12.71
297.01
1.52
1.52-
395.96
91.18
6.68
52.9O
6.39
5.36
3.34
16.70
9.3'5
1.52
23.90-
10:5.20
136.95
200.7O
695 .OO
15.OO
35 .OO
216.55
16.8
~.95
65 .OO
130.00
176.63
522.OO
50.25
89.38
176.OO
229.75
67.G6.
39.75
:59.75
152.67
CHECK
3,525.06
56~ .30
103.20
5~5 .OO
231.18
66.95
65 .OO
130.OO
1,242.01
67.0~
15:06
VOUCHER/
CHECk: CHECK VEI)OR
NUMBER DATE NI.J4BER
22606 0~109195 00014~)
22606 03109195 00014,0
22606 03109195 00014,0
22606 03109195 00014,0
22606 03/09/95 000140
22607 03/09/95 001275
22608 03109195 000~2
22610 0;$109195 001200
22611 03109195
M
COLONIAL LIFE & ACClDEN
COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDBd
COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN
COLONIAL LIFE & ACClDEN
COLONIAL LIFE & ACClDEN
CONPUSERVE, INC.
COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS
COUNTS UNLINITED
CRAFTSHEN PLtlBING HEAT
CRONKHITE, MICHELLE
22612 03109195 000155 DAVLIN
22613 03109195 000156
22613 03109195 000156
2~.A.1~ 03/09/95 000156
03/09/95 000156
03/09/95 000156
22614 03/09/95 001669
22614 03/09/95 001669
22614 03/09/95 001669
22614 03/09/95 001669
22615 03/09/95 000523
22616 03/09/95 001135
22617 03/09/95 000643
22617 03/09/95 000643
22618 03/09/95 000993
22619 03109195 0001~
22619 ~109195 000184
22619 03109195 0001~
22619 0;$109195 00016/,
22619 0:$109195 0001~
22620 03/099/95 000177
22620 03/09/95 000177
22620 03109195 000177
22620 03/09/95 000177
22620 03/09/95 000177
7""' 03/09/95 000177
DENTICARE OF CALIFORNIA
DENTICARE OF CALIFORNIA
DENTICARE OF CALIFONNIA
DENTICARE OF CALIFORNIA
DENTICARE OF CALIFORNIA
DUNN EDgARDS CORPORATIO
DUNN EDMARDS CO~PORATIO
DUNN EDUARDS CORPORATIO
DUNN EDgARDS CORPORATIO
EASTERN MIJNICIPAL gATER
FIRST CARE INDUSTRIAL N
FORTNER HANDHARE, INC.
FONTNER HARDHARE, INC.
FREEDON COFFEE, INC.
G T E CALIFORNIA - PAT!q
G T E CALIFORNIA - PAY!q
G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYIq
G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYN
G T E CALIFORNIA - PA~q
GLENNIES OFFICE Plffil)UCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PROOtJCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIE$ OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PROOUCT
CITY OF/BeEaliA
VOUCIlil/ClECl SISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITB4
DESCEIPTION
000140 CANCER
O001Q) CANCER
0001/,0 CAMCER
000140 CANCER
FEB 95 USAGE CHARGE
ALARH MONITOP41 CITY NALL QTRLY"
TRAFFIC CENSUS IMSTER STATIONS
INSTALL GARBAGE DISPOSALISle CT
REFUMD FON TCSO CLASS
AIX)IO/TAPE COUNCIL 2/28/95
000156 DENT-HEV
000156 DENTICAR
000156 DEN-MIN
000156 DENT-AOV
000156 OENTZCAR
RECYCLED GRAFFITI PAINT
TAX
RECYCLED GRAFFITI PAINT
TAX
EASEMENT FOR 115 & VIMCHESTER
PRE-EHPLOYMENT PHYSICAL/BAKER
TCSD HAINT SUPPLIES
NISC. SUPPLIES FOR
COFFEE SUPPLIES CITY HALL
909 181-1123 GEN
909 695-356~ CITY NALL ALARN
909 t-01Z8 GEN
909 699-6~67 FILIt COUNCIL
909 699-7~5 CRC FIRE ALARN
NISC OFFICE SUPPLIES
NISC. OFFICE SlIPPLIES
MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISt OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISt. OFFICE $1JPPLIES
OFFICE $tJPPLIES TCND
100-2330
190-2330
191-2330
193-2330
320-199-999-5228
34,0-199-999-5250
100-164,-602-5~6
190-181-999-5Z12
190-183-4,982
001-100-999-5230
001-1180
001-2340
001 -Z~O
001-1180
001-2340
100-164-601-5218
100-164-601-5218
100-164-601-5218
100-164-001-5218
210-165-602-5700
001-150-999-524,8
190-180-999-5212
100-164-601-5218
34,0-199-999-5250
320-199-999-5208
320-199-999-5200
;$20-199-999-52OD
320-199-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
001 - 110-999-5220
001-1&0-999-5220
001-110-999-5220
001-110-999-5220
001-140-999-5220
190-180-999-5220
ITEN
NeUNT
12.9~.
83.64
14,.35
17.53
5.18
16.11
135.00
A60.00
701.67
7.84,-
7.84~
7.~
7.84.
135.73
10.52
92.80
7.19
300.00
65.00
218.5;$
169.61
165.35
545.13
52.01
1.152.;$1
53.56
7.~
80.81
2.~8
9.)0
91.18
10.85
PA~E
CHECK
NIIUIIT
365.61
16.11
135.00
800.OD
/~).00
701.61
~88.14,
165 35
201.88
VOUCHER/
CHECK
22623
22623
22623
22623
22623
22623
22623
22623
22623
22623
22623
22624
22625
22625
22626
22626
22626
22626
22626
22626
22626
22626
22626
22626
22626
22626
22626
22626
22626
22626
22626
22626
22626
22626
22626
15:08
CHECK
DATE
~/~/~
~/~/95
~/~/~
~/W/~
~/~/~
~/~/~
~/~/K
~/~/~
~/~/95
03/O9/~5
03109195
03/09/95
03~09~95
03/09/95
031009195
03/09/95
03/09/95
VEIQOR
NUMBER
000430
000430
oo0430
000430
000430
000430
000430
000430
000430
000430
000430
000430
000186
000186
001536
001536
0015~6
001536
001536
001536
001536
0015~6
O01536
001536
001536
001536
001536
001536
001536
001536
0015~6
001536
0015~6
M
GLOeAL ~ER StRaPLIE
GLOBAL ~ER SUPPLIE
GLOBAL COMPUTER IUPPLIE
GLOBAL CaePUTER SI. FPLIE
GLOBAL COMPUTER SU~LIE
GLOBAL CONPUTER SUPPLIE
GLOgAL ~ER ~PPLIE
-GLOBAL (:014PUTER SUPPLIE
GLOBAL COlINTER $UPPLIE
GOVERNING
GROUP HRICA - VOLUIITA
GROUP ANERICA - VOLIMTA
GROUP HRICA - VOUMTA
GROUP HRICA - VOLUNTA
GROUP AHER l CA - VOLUNTA
GROUP AHERICA - VOLUNTA
GROUP AHERICA - VOLUNTA
GROUP N4ERICA - VOLUNTA
GROUP NqER]CA - VOLUNTA
GROIJP ANER]CA - VOLUNTA
GROUP ANERICA - VOLUNTA
GROUP NqERICA - VOLUNTA
HANKS HARDUARE, INC.
HANKS HARDVARE, INC.
HARTFORD L[FE INSURANCE
HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE
HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE
HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE
HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE
HARTFORD L]FE INSURANCE
HARTFORD LIFE [NSIJ~NCE
HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE
HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE
HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE
HARTFORD LIFE ]NiCE
HARTFORD LIFE INSIMRNCE
HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE
HARTFOIU) LIFE INSURANCE
HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE
HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE
HARTFOeD LIFE INSURANCE
HARTFORD LIFE INSIMANCE
HARTFORD LIFE ]NICE
HARTFOIU) LIFE INSURANCE
HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE
CITY OF TENECIA.A
ICHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESORIPT[OIt
HPJEI'DIRECTPR!IrrSERVER
FREIGHT
TAX
$NART-UPSPOMERBAClOJP
FREIGHT
TAX
HP LETTER PRINTER TRAY
FREIGHT
TAX
PRINTING COST FOR SU~SCEIPTION
O00&30 VL REVER
000430 VOL LIFE
000~30 VOL L[FE
000~30 VOL LIFE
000~30 VOL L l FE
000/,30 VOL LIFE
000430 VL ADVAX
0004~0 VOL LIFE
000430 VOL LIFE
000430 VOL LIFE
000430 VOL LIFE
000430 VOL LIFE
VELLUI4 FOR tIESTERN BY PASS
IqAINT. SUPPLIES FOR CITY HALL
TCSD )fAINT SUPPLIES
001536 LIFE INS
001536 LIFE INS
001536 LIFE INS
001536 LIFE INS
001536 LIFE INS
001536 LIFE INS
001536 LIFE INS
001536 LIFE INS
001536 LIFE INS
0015:56 LIFE INS
0015:56 LIFE InS
001536 LIFE INS
001536 LTD
001536 LTD
001536 LTD
0015:~ LTD
001536 LTD
001536 LTD
001536 LTD
001536 LTD
001536 LTD
ACCOUNT
NUNBER
320-199-999-5221
320-199-f~9-5221
320-199-999-5221
3Z0-199:999-5221
320-199-999-5221
320-199-999-5221
320-199-999-5221
320-199-999-5221
320-199-999-5221
001 - 110-999-5228
001-2510
001 -~510
100-2310
190-~510
192-~510
3~0-~510
0ol-25io
001-Z510
10o-2510
190-231o
192-2510
7~0-2510
100-166-60~-5268
~43-199-999-5212
190;180-999-5212
001-2360
100-2360
165-2360
190-2360
191 -Z360
192-Z360
193-2360
320-2360
O01-2380
100-2380
165-2380
190-2380
191-2380
192-2380
193-Z380
300-Z580_
ITEN
3?9.95
11.75
30.08
346.95
13.56
27.35
49.49
6.4.8
4.00
190.80-
138.91
15.79
29.69
6.00
.61
190.80
138.91
15.79
29.68
.62
53.50
395.82
585.50
120.00
144.50
4.50
10.00
15.50
2.00
2.50
10.00
10.00
21.50
616.87
126.55
5.6~
6.53
5,17
16, 10
3,17
1.8~
867.61
9.0O
381.60
5'5.50
62O.55
15:08
V~UCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENI)OR
NUIIER DATE IIIER
22626 03109/95
22626 0)109195 001536
22626 0)109195 0015)6
22626 03/09/~5 001536
22626 03109195 001536
22626 03109195 001536
22626 03/09/95 001536
~ 03/09/95 001536
22626 03/09/95 001536
22626 03/09/95 001536
22626 03/09/95 001536
22626 03/09/95 001536
22626 03/09/95 O01536
22626 03/09/95 001536
22626 O3/09/95 001536
22628 03/09/95 001517
22628 03/09/95 001517
22628 03/09/95 001517
,~...9 03/09/95
· 03/09/95 0016~.
22630 03/09/95 001644
22630 03/09/95 001(~.
22630 03/09/95
22631 03/0~/95 001720
22631 03/09/95 001720
22632 03/09/95 000194
22632 03/09/95 00019~
22632 03/09/95 000194
22632 03/09/95 000194
22632 03/0~/95 000194
22632 03109195 000194
22632 03/09/95 000194
22632 03/09/95 000194
lIME
HARTFOIID LIFE INSURAIICE
HARTFORD LIFE INCURNICE
HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE
HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE
HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE
HARTFORD LIFE INSUIUUICE
HARTF(ID LIFE INSURANCE
HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE
HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE
HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE
HARTFCID LIFE INSURANCE
HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE
HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE
HARTKID LIFE INSURANCE
HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE
HEALTH & HUHAN RESOURCE
HEALTH & HUMAN RESOURCE
HEALTH & HUllAN RESOURCE
HILL, LEIGH
HILLCREST CONTRACTING,
HILLCREST CONTRACTING,
HILLCREST CONTRACTING,
HILLCREST CONTRACTING,
HOHETRONICS, INC.
HOHETRONICS, INC.
RETIREIENT TRUS
RETIREHENT TRUS
RETIRElENT TRUS
RETIRElENT TITUS
RETIRElENT TRUS
RETIRENEMT TRUS
RETIRElENT TRUS
RETIRElENT TRUS
22633 03/09/95 000863 X P N A
2263~ 03109195
22635 03109195
22636 03/09/95 001887
22637 03/09/95 000206
~ 03/09/95 000209
03/09/95 000209
INTERRATIONAL AS$OC. OF
JACUBIRAS, HENRY
KENPER LUI4BERHANS
KINKO'S OF RIVERSIDE,
L & N FERTILIZER, INC.
L & N FERTILIZER, INC.
CITY OF I'BIECUI. A
VI:)UCI~CHECK PEGlITER
FOR ALL PERIODS
[TEN
DESCRIPTION
001536 LTD
001536 LTD
001536 LTD
0015:36 STD
001536 STD
001536 STD
001536 STD
001536 S11)
001536 STD
001536 STD
001536 STD
001536 STD
001536 STD
001536 STD
001536 STD
STAFF DEVELOI~4ENT MI(SHP
STAFF DEVELOPtENT M(SHP
EIELOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAI4
REFUND FOR TCSD CLASS
CITYHIDE PCC REPAIR Pt~j~-13
CITY HIDE PCC REPAIR PF~-13
RETENTION H/H INVI 2713
CITYHIDE PCC REPAIR PH~4-13
STEREO EQUIPHENT-SENIOR CENTER
TAX
000194 DEF COHP
000194 DEF
000194 DEF CONP
000194 DEF COI4P
000194 DEF COI4P
000194 DEF COI4P
000194 DEF C()!P
000194 DEF CCNP
NBRSHP DUES FOR YATES 2/95-96
CONF:TURN TIDES OF FItAUD&/5
REFUND FOR TCSD CLASS
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
OLD TONI SPECIFIC PLAN EIR
TCSD MISt LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES
HISC HAINT SUPPLIES FOR I~f
ACCOtJNT
191-2500
192-2500.
1~3-2500
280-2500.
300-2500.
320-2500
g0-2500
001-162-;-5Z50
001-162-~)9-5250
001-150-;-5248
1~)-183-&~BD
100-16~-601-5~02
100-164-601-5402
100-2035
100-164-601-5~02
1~0-181-~-5301
1~0-181-~-5301
001-2080
100-2080
1~0-2080
191-2080
192-2080
lf3-2080
280-2080
3~0-2080
001-150-~9-5226
001-1/0-~-5261
190-183-4~2
001-2030
100-t6~-603-5250
1~0-180-9~-5242
100-164-601-5218
ITEN
MIOUIIT
13.89
5.17
14.87
1,321.02
271,15
12.29
297.92
9.87
11.Z6
35.08
6.91
30.28
11.26
150.O0
300.00
328,25
3.00
52,307.85
8,64~.87
6,0~5.28-
3,414.0~'
418.00
32.40
1,248.81
230.65
571.55
65.51
?5.00
80.06
43.01
22.50
213.00
45.00
40,00
32,5/,3.01
44.38
11.85
6.8~
P~AE
N4OIJNT
3,919.89
51 ,U3.35
450.~0
2,337.09
213.00
45.00
32,5/,3.01
CHECE:
mlIBER
22638
22639
2264.0
2264.1
22641
226/,2
226~2
22643
22643
22644
226~5
226~6
22646
22646
22646
22646
22~6
226~6
22646
226~6
226~6
226~6
226~6
226~6
226~6
226~6
226~6
226~6
226~6
2264~
226~7
226~7
22~7
22.~7
15:08
~E~
D~E
~/~/95
~/~/~
~/~1~
~1~/~
~/~/~
~/09/95
0]/09/95
03/09/95
03/09/95
0~/09/95
03/09/95
03/09/95
03/09/95
03/09/95
03/09/95
03/09/~
03/09/95
03/09/95
03/09/95
03/09/95
03/09/95
03/09/95
03/09/95
0]/09/95
03/09/95
03/09/95
03/09/95
03/09/95
03/09/95
03/09/95
VENDOR
lIMBER
QOQ209
001513
Q00883
000883
QOIQ07
QOIOQ7
001007
Q0139~
001394
001676
0002A6
000246
000246
0002/~,
000246
000246
000246
000246
0002~
O002~&
000246
0002~6
000246
0002/,6
0002/,6
000246
0002~6
0002/,6
000246
00024~
00024,6
000246
000246
000245
0002/,5
000245
000245
0002/,5
NAME
L & N FERTILIZER, INC.
LIBERTY AUTO CENTER
MANNING ENGINEERING
MONTELEONE EXCAVATING
MONTELEONE EXCAVATING
NPG~P.
NPG ~P.
NPG~P.
NATIONAL SANITARY SUPPL
NATIONAL SANITARY SUPPL
NEXTEL CCIIIIICATIONS,
OLSTEN STAFFING SERVICE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PENS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PENS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PENS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PENS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PENS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PENS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PENS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PENS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PER$ (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (E!ePLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PIlE
PERS (HEALTH INSUlt. PRE
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE
CITY OF TBIECULA
VOUCHER/CIECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERICI)S
ITEM
DESCEIPTION
NISC. MAINT SUPPLIES
TCSD VEHICLE NAIliT.
REVISED DESIGN FOR LINTEL DRgY
CLEAN-UP STREET DEBRIS
CLEAN-UP STREET DEBRIS
ASPHALT PATCH UORK-VARIOUS
ASPHALT PATCH UORK-VAR!OUS
ASPHALT PATCH UORK-PALA leD.
CEC BUILDING NAINT SUPPLIES
CLEANING SUPPLIES a C.R.C.
HARCH 95 leOBILE SERVICE
TEMP HELP VIE 2112 GRAGE
0002/,6 PER RIDE
0002/,6 PERS RET
000246 PERS RET
0002~6 PERS RET
0002~6 PIES RET
0002/,6 PERS RET
0002~6 PERS RET
000246 PENS MET
0002~ PERS RET
~2~ PERS RET
~02~ ~RS SET
0~2~ PERS ET
~02~ PERS ffi
0002~ ~Vl~
~02~ ~Vl~
0002~ ~VI~
0002~ ~Vl~
~02~ ~I~
~2~ IVl~
~2~ MVI~
~2~ MVI~
~ MVI~
~Vi~
MVI ~
~2~5 ~T~ ~
~2~5
12~5 HiLT~T
~2~5 ~LTNMB
0002~5 ELT~ET
100-16&-601-5218
190-180-999-521~
210-190-136-5802
001 - 166-999-5~02
001-166-999-5/,02
001-1~-~-5402
001 - 1~,-999-.%02
001-1(i-99~-54.02
190-182-999-5212
1~0-182-99~-5212
320-199-999-5209
001-162-999-5118
001.~2130
001-2390
loo-239b
165-2390
191-2390
192-2390
280-2390
3 O0 - 23~0
320-2390
330 - 239O
340-239O
100-2390
165-2390
191-2390
300-23~0
320-2390
330-2390;
340-239O
.~
001-2090
001
165-21)90
ITEM
AllOtIT
15.88
21.03
100.00
2,032.00
1,626.00
1,350.00
1,350.00
1,350.00
.32
51
f84.00
,t~8.00
6.~
12,~5.30
2,3~.~
1~.~
~.91
319.45
61.17
37.~
268.21
301.~
11.15
.37
13.~
1.~
.19
.23
2.~
18.70
20.45
2T/'.83
13.&6
7.81
CHECK
NlOUlrr
21
100.00
3,658.00
4,QSQ.QQ
18,897.3/,
15:08
VOIJCHER/
CHECX CHECl: VEIl)OR
lIE DATE IIIER
NANE
CITY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEH
DESCRIPTION
PERS (HEALTH IND. IRE QQ0265
PERS (HEALTH IND. PIlE 000265
PERS (HEALTH IND. Pile 000265
PERS (HEALTH IND. PRE 000265
PERS (HEALTH IND. PRE 000265
PERS (HEALTH IND. IRE 080265
PERS (HEALTH INSIJR. IRE 000265
PERS (HEALTH IND. IRE 008265
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. Pile 000265
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000265
PERS (HEALTH '~NSUR. IRE 000265
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. Pile 000265
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000265
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000265
PERS (HEALTH ]NSUR. PRE 000265
PERS (HEALTH ]NSUR. PRE 000265
PERS (HEALTH ]NSUR. Pile 000265
PERS (HEALTH ]NSUR. PRE 000265
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000265
PERS (HEALTH INSIJR. PRE 000265
PERS (HEALTH |NSUR. PRE 000265
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000265
PERS (HEALTH ZNSUR. IRE 000265
PERS (HEALTH [NSUR. PRE 000245
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. IRE 000245
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. Pile 000245
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000265
PERS (HEALTH INSIJR. PRE 000245
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245
PERS (HEALTH INStill. IRE 000245
PERS (HEALTH INSLIP,. IRE 000245
PERS (HEALTH ]NSUR. IRE 000245
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245
PERS (HEALTH INSUP,. PRE 000245
PERS (HEALTH IND. PRE 000245
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245
PERS (HEALTH IND. PRE 0002/*5
PERS (HEALTH [NSUR. PRE 000245
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. IRE 000245
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. IRE 0002/*5
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. IRE 0002/*5
PERS (HEALTH INStJR. IRE 000265
PERS (HEALTH IND. IRE 000245
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 0002/*5
PERS (HEALTH INSUR. IRE 000265
PERS (HEALTH ]NSLIR. IRE
HELTHIIET
HELTIINET
KAISERSO
KAISERSO
KAISERSO
PACIFICR
PACI FICR
PC
PEltS ClIO "
PERS REV
TAKE(ARE
TICARE
TICARE
AETEA SO
AETNA SO
BLSHIELD
C[GNA
CtGNA
CIGNA
CIGNA
HELTHllET
HELTHNET
HELTHNET
HELTNNET
HELTHllET
HELTHNET
HELTHNET
HELTHNET
KAISERSO
KAISERSO
KA [ SERSO
PAC[FiCR
PACZFZCR
PACZFZCR
PAC[FZCR
PC
PERS CHO
PERS CHO
PERS Clio
PERS DED
PERS -AD!4
TAKE(ARE
TAi~CARE
TICARE
TAKE(ARE
ENPLOYEES ON DISABILITY PORTIO
226~8 0)109195 0802~8 PETRF,.ANE FUEL EXPENSE
~ 03109195 0002~8 PETROLANE FUEL EXPENSE
~03/09/95 000268 PETROLANE FUEL EXPENSE
ACCOUNT
Nt148ER
lf0-20~)
)40-20~)
001-20~0.
1~0-20f0
:~0-20~Q
0ol -2~
100-2~
001-21
001-2~
001-2~
~1-21
1~-~
~-21
~1-2~
100-2~
0ol -2~
1~-21
1~-2~
3~-2~
001-21
1~-2~
1~5-21
1~-2~
1~1-Z~
1~-2~
S)o-2~
~o-2WO
ool -2~
loo-2~
1~-2~
~0-2~
001 -~
100-2~
1~-2~
1~2-2~0
ool -2~o
001-2~
1~-2~
2~-21
1~-~
~-21
~o-21
~1-11~
001 - I~.JF~- 526)
1fO-180-f~-526)
001-1~..;~-5253
'i,
mT
55.18
8.10
5.92
17.87
3.15
35.26
23.32
121.26
7'20.51 -
7.97
?'21.78
39.81
626.21
857.39
176.06
:306.20
1,0~7.0)
158.05
1,762.~0
143.53
159./,8
606.55
612.12
513.20
61.36
1,032.38
3~.73
733
512.76
I
11.05
6.97
720.51
107.59
1,597.29
832.~2
76.80
163.03
397.00
PAGE7
CSECI(
ANOUIIT
21,1~.86
VOUCHRE2
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUI4BER
Z2669
~2669
~&69
22669
~2&69
22669
Z2669
~2669
22669
22650
22650
22651
22652
22652
22652
22652
22652
22652
22652
22652
22652
22652
22652
22652
22652
22653
22656
22655
22656
22657
22658
22659
22659
22659
22659
22659
22659
22659
22659
15:08
CHECK
DATE
0~109195
03109195
03109195
03/09/95
03109195
03109195
03109195
03109195
03/09/95
03~09/95
03/09/95
03/09/95
03109195
03/09/95
03109/95
03109/95
03109/95
03109195
03109195
03109195
03109195
03109195
03109195
03109195
03109195
03/0~95
VEIX3R
MR
000269
000269
000269
000249
000269
000249
000249
000269
000269
000269
000516
001537
001537
001537
001537
001537
001537
001537
001537
001537
001537
001537
001537
001537
000255
001616
001616
0005~6
00087V
000~2
OOO728
000262
000262
000262
000262
000262
000262
000262
000262
VENOOR
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PHOTOMORKS
PHOTO MORKS
PRENTICE HALL, INC.
PRINCIPAL NUTUAL,
PRINCIPAL NUTUAL, INC.
PRINCIPAL HUTUAL, INC.
PRINCIPAL MUTUAL, INC.
PRINCIPAL NtJTUAL, INC.
PRINCIPAL HUTUAL, INC.
PRINCIPAL NUTUAL, INC.
PRINCIPAL HUTUAL, INC.
PRINCIPAL HUTUAL, INC.
PRINCIPAL NUTUAL, INC.
PRINCIPAL HUTUAL, INC.
PRINCIPAL liJTUAL, INC.
PRINCIPAL NUTUAL, INC.
PRO LOCK & KEY
QUICK CRETE PRODUCTS, l
QUICK CRETE PRCOUCTS, I
RADIO SHACK
RADISSON HOTEL - VISALI
RAMONA TIRE, INC.
RAMSEY RACKFLOg & PLUII
PANClIO CALIFORNIA liTER
RANCHO CALIFORNIA liTER
RANClIO CALIFORNIA liTER
RANCNO CALIFORNIA liTER
RANClIO CALIFORNIA liTER
ItAliCNO CALIFORNIA liTER
RANCNO CALIFORNIA liTER
RANCliO CALIFORNIA liTER
CITY OF TEMECIJLA
VDUCIER/CHECK SISTER
RXt ALL PEItla)S
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
PETTY CASH liEIll.
PETTY CASH liEIll.
PETTY CASH liEIll.
PETTY CASH RElll.
PETTY CASH IElll.
PETTY CASH liEIll.
PETTY CASH RElll.
PETTY CASH RElll,
PETTY CASH RElll.
PETTY CASH RElll,
FIU!, SLIDES, & PICTURES
FILH, SLIDES, & PICTURES
BOOK:LIFETINE CfiI4. GUIDE
001537 DENT ADV
OO1537 DENTALM4
001537 DENTALPN
0015)7 DENTALPN
001537 DENTALPI!
00153? DENTALPN
001537 DENYALP.
001537 DENTALP.
00153? DENTALP.
00153? DENTALP.
00153? DENTALP.
00153? DENYALP.
OVERSTATED CQeRA
TCED LOCKSMITH SERVICES
2 GRAY STEEL ASH LID-T
TAX
MISC COI41~JTER SUPPLIES
CONF:SIERRA ALVAREZ HOTEL ROOM
TIRE FOR Pg POOL TRUCK
RACKFLOg ANMUAL TEST & REPAIR
01-06-8,L~00-1 01/16-02/15/95
01-08-18505-2 1/17-2/21/95
liTER SERVICE 1/12-2/15/95
liTER SERVICE 1/12-2/15/95
liTER SERVICE 1/12-2/15/95
liTER SERVICE 1/12-2/15/~5
liTER SERVICE 1/12-2/15/95
liTER SERVICE 1112-2/15/95
ACCI/IIT
NUMBER
190-181-999-5~01
001-100-999-5220
001 - 160-999-5220
NO1-163-999-5261
001-161-999-5220
001-160-999-5258
001-161-999-5258
001-100-999-5260
-' 001-165-999-5220
100-16~-601-5258
001-110,~-5250
001-110-~-5250
:,
100-180.~-5228
001-1180
001-2~,0
100-2360
165-~0
191 -~0
1~-~0
16-~0
~00-~0
~0-~0
~0-~0
~1-11~
190-180-~-5212
100-180-~-5262
1~)-180-9q~-52~2
320-1W-~-5221
001 - 162;999- 5258
100-1~,;.601-5262
1~0-180.~-5212
100-16&-601-5260
190-180-999-5260
100-180-999-5260
190-181-999-5260
1~0-182-9f~-5260
191-180-~-5260
193-180-~-5260
360-1~-~-5260
ITEM
ANOUNT
86.86
11.86
32.75
30.67
8.76
18.4~
6.76
30.00
16.00
55.00
12.f3
f~.13
60.85
122.,~
1,181.86
312.58
17.16
197.69
7.32
42,913
8.~
8.58
10.72
16.26
69.33
10.00-
22.$6
590.00
65.73
17.5A
231.00
51.70
602.00
12.69
35.19
551.21
8~.21
352.~6
110.73
387.16
10.60
CHECK
N4OUNT
112.06
60.85
635.73
17.5/,
2:51.00
51.70
602.00
CITY OF TBIECULA
: 15:08 ~CHEC3C lEilSlil
VOUCHER/ ~ ~'
CHECK CHECK VEN~ VEIl)OR ITEN ACI~XJNT
\
NUIIER DATE NUNBER NANE DESCRIPTION NUNSER
PAGE9
22660 03/09/95 000/,26 ItAliCIN) INDUSTRIAL SUPPL C-FOLD TMLS FOR SR CNTR 190-181-999-5212
22661 03109195 001046 REXOIl, FREEDNAN, XLEPET HLI4AN RESOURCES LEGAL SERVICES 001-130-999-5267 675.35 675.35
22662 03/09/95 000266 RIG~TMAY
PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL I YARD 100-164-601-5238
57.39 57.39
22663 03/09/95 000353 RIVERS[DE CO. AUDITOR
22663 03/09/95 000353 RIVERSIDE CO: AUDITOR
FEB 95 COUNTY PRICING ASSESSHEN 001-2265
FEB 95 COUNTY PRICING ASSESSMEN 881-2260
50.00
210.00 260.00
22664 03/09/95 000678 RIVERSIDE IX:). HEALTH SE HEALTH ~RNIT FOR POOL
190-180-999-5250 210.00 -. 210.00
22665 03109195 00070~ S K S, INC/INUIJI) OIL CITY VEHICLES FUEL EXPENSE 100-164-601-5263
22665 03109195 Q00704 S K S, IMC/INLAND OIL CITY VEHICLES FUEL EXPENSE 100-164-60G-5263
22665 03109195 000 70~ S K S, INC/INLNI) OIL CITY VEHICLES FUEL EXPENSE 001-163-999-5263
22665 03/09/95 OQO?C)4 S K S, INC/INLAND OIL CITY VEHICLES FUEL EXPENSE 001-165-999-52e3
22665 03/09/95 000?04 S K S, INC/INLAND OIL CITY VEHICLES FUEL EXPENSE 190-180-999-5263
22665 03/09/95 000?04 S K S, INC/INLAND OIL CITY VEHICLES FUEL EXPENSE 881-162-999-5263
178./d)
26.56
77.82
57.10
169.57
50.2O
557.65
22666 03/88/95 001889 SHAFER, ALICIA TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 19O'183-999-5330
2,~.6A7 03/0~/95 001888 SHAFER, A!4BER TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
. 03/09/95 000~3~ SIERRA CX3HPUTER SYSTEMS CORF:SIEREA ~OFTgARE:T.ALVAREZ 001-162~99~-5258
403.20
603.20
175.00
22669 03/09/95 000751 SKILLPATH, INC.
SENINAR: BUSINESS liRITING:BERG 001-162-999-5261
1~9.00
169.00 '
22670 03/88/95 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON - 2-00-397-50~2 CITY HALL ELECT 3~0-199-9(~-5260
22670 03/09/95 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON - 2-00-397-5026 ELECT. SERVICES 191-180-999-5319
22670 03/09/95 000537 SOIJTHERN CALIF EDISON - 2-00-397-5059 ELECT SERVICE 19O-180-9O9-5260
22670 03/09/95 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON - 2-00-397-5067 ELECT SERVICE 193-180-999-5260
22670 O3/O9/95 OO053? SOUTHERN CALIF EDISOR - 66-77-795-8082-01 1/25-2/25/95 19O-181-9O9-5260
2,733.80
3,868.37
1,675.63
460.36
630.61
9,1/k8.37
22671 03/0~/95 000296
22671 03188195 000296
22671 03/09195 0002~6
22671 03/0~/95 0002~
22671 03/09/95 000296
22671 03/88/95 000296
22671 03/09/95 000296
22671 03/09/95 000296
22671 03/88/95 000294
22671 03/09/95 00029~
22671 03/09/95 00029~
22671 03109195 00029~
.22672 03109195 001753
22675 ~1~195 001567
22675 ~/~/95 001567
~ 03109195 001567
~1~!95 001547
STATE FUND - SAN FILANCi
STATE FUND - SAN FRANCI
STATE FUND - SAN FRANCI
STATE FtJtG) - SAN FRANCI
STATE FUI¢ - SAN FRANCI
STATE FIJND - SAN FRANCI
STATE FUND - SAIl FItANCI
STATE FUND - SAN FRAIICI
STATE FUND - ~ FIMIIC]
STATE FUND - SAN FRANCI
STATE FUND - SAN FRANCI
STATE FUND - SAN FRANCI
TAVAGLIORE, NICHOLAS F.
TEN, ISTERS LOCAL 911
TEMISTERS LOCAL 911
TENGTERS LOCAL 911
TEN4STERS LOCAL 911
FEB 95 ll)RKERS' CORP PHT
FEB 95 gOelCERS' COf4P ~
FEB 95 VORKERS' COI4P PHT
FEB 95 ll)NCERS' COI4P PHT
FEB 95 MORKERS' CONP PtlT
FED95 MORKERS' COf4P P~
FEB 95 MORKERS' CONP PI4T
FEB95 gOIUCERS' CCle PHT
FED95 UOIUCERS' CCllP Plrr
FEB 95 I,IORICERS' CONP Pf4T
FEB95 tIIICERS' I:a4P FI4T
FEB 95 IIORICERS' CONP PHT
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
001547 UN DUES
0015/,7 UN DUES
001567 UN DUES
001567 UN DUES
300-23/0
320-Z370
3:30-Z370
360-Z370'
001-2030
001-2125
100-2125
165-2125
190-2125
4,244.32
1,916.06
52.46
1,783.09
101.03
9.05
143.64
27.19
22.03
25.81
2.44)
802.80
438.61
76.77
7.60
85.10
8,673.76.
8O2.8O
VOUCHER/
CHECk:
NLI4BER
2267~,
22675
22676
22676
22676
22676
22677
22678
22678
22678
22679
22679
22679
22679
22679
22679
22680
22680
22680
22~1
Z2~1
22~1
22~1
22682
22682
22682
22682
22682
22684
22685
22687
15:08
CHECK
DATE
03109195
0310919S
03/O9/95
03109195
03109195
03/09/95
03109195
03109195
03/09/95
03/09/95
03/09/95
03109195
03109195
03109195
03109/95
03/09/95
03/09/95
03109195
03109195
03/09/95
03109195
03/09/95
VENDOR
NLI4BER
OO15~,7
OO15~7
00154?
OO1219
000306
000~2
00064,2
000~2
000~2
001~87
000320
000320
000320
0010~5
001065
001065
001065
001065
001065
000389
00038~
00038~
000325
000325
000325
000325
000326
000326
000326
000326
080326
001885
001884
M
CITY OF TENEClJLA
VOUClIBt/CIICK REGISTEll
FOR ALL PERIORS
ITEN
DESCRIPTIOR
TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 tIN DUES
TENISTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES
TEANSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 tIN DUES
TEANSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 ON DUES
TEHE(:ULA VALLEY LASER R
TEHECULA VALLEY PIPE &
TEHECULA, CITY OF - FLE
TENECULA, CITY OF ' FLE
TENECULA, CITY OF ' FLE
TEECUL~, CITY OF ' FLE
TIERRA HECHANICAL, INC.
TOWNE CENTER STATIClEAS
TOI, INE CENTER STATIONERS
TOMNE CENTER STATIONERS
U S C N/PEBSCO (DEF. C
U S C N/PEBSCO (DEF. C
U S C N IPEBSCO (DEF. C
U S C N/PEBSCO (DEF. C
U S C N/PENSCO (DEF. C
U S C N/PEBSCO (DEF. C
u s c N/PEBSCO
U S C N/PEBSCO (OBRA)
U S C N/PEBSCO (OeRA)
UNITED MAY OF THE INLAN
UNITED WAY OF THE INLAN
UNITED ilkY OF THE INLAN
UNITED WAY OF THE INLAN
UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE,
UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE,
UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE,
UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE,
UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE,
VAULT INC., THE
VOTE YES ON B SPONSORED
WASHBURN, LELAND
WNITMARSH, ANLENE
glLSON, PAT C.
HP LASERJET SERVICE/REPAIR
NAINT SUPPLIES FOR TCSD FACILI
FLEXIBLE SEEFIT NEIN8.
FLEXIBLE NEEFIT NEINB.
FLEXIBLE SESEFIT Ell.
FLEXIBLE NEEFIT REIli.
HEAT/AIR $YSTB4 IMINTi SR CTR
OFFICE SUPPLIES - ~ PROJECTS
OFFICE SUPPLIES INN N4IN
OFFICE SUPPLIES LAll) DEVEL
001065 DEF Cg4P
0010~5 DEF CCl4P
001065 DEF CONP
001065 DEF CCl4P
001065 DEF
001065 DEF COHP
000389 PT RETIR
000~89 PT RETIR
000389 PT RETIR
000325 UU
000325 IN
000325 IN
000325 IN
ONIFORMSNAINT FOR IN
UNIFORN KAINT FOR TCSl) PERSONN
FLO0~ 14ATS HAINT a CITY HALL
FLOOR NATS RENTAL 0 C.R.C.
FLOOR NATS RENTAL 8 SE ONTR
RUSH COURIER W/I 6 ROURS
SECURITY DEPOSIT REFUNDCC.R.C)
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
REFUND FOR TCID CLASS
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
ACI3XMT
~R
lrl -2125
193-2125
3OO-2125
320-2125
320-199:.999-5215
.~-
190-180'~999'5212
001'1020
190'1020
100'1020
3OO-1020
190-181-~-5212
001-165-~-5220
100-164-604-5220
OOl-16S-gW-5220
001-2080
100-2080
190-2080
300-2080
320-2080
340-2080
O01-2160
100-2160
1~0-2160
001-2120
100-2120'
190-2120
280-2120
100-164-601-5243
1~)-180-;-522,3
3~0-1 ~-~- 5250
190-182-;-5250
190-181-~-5250
001-120-999-5250
001-2030
001-2030
ITEM
ANOUMT
4.62
18.50
131.56
36.4~
3,145.19
321
30.25
12.49
91.8A
~.77
84.34
1,87'7.31
132.2]
271
4.99
312.50
50.00
216.24
67.30
236.40
59.37
17.00
.60
29.16
16.85
54.50
66.&4
16.75
loo.OO
200,78
200.70
CECK
ANIXlIT
666.OO
131.56
~6.44
3,509 · 87
89.00
275.95
2,64.8.52
519.9A
4,0.OO
3
15:08
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VEIl)OR
NUI4BER DATE ~ER
22688 0~109195
2~689 0~109195 000347
VENDOR
M
XEROX COItPORATIC)N BILLI
ZEE SERVICE CO
CITY OF TBIECUI. A
VCNJCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERICOS
ITEM
DESCRIPTIQli
NETERUSAGE FOR FEB95
FIRST AID SUPPLIES a CITY IL4LL
ACCOUNT
IIIIBER
~]0-199-999- 5239
3~0-199-999.-5242
ITEM
AMOUNT
1,017.~
~.~
PA~E 11
CHECK
AIIOUNT
1,017.98
65.03
TOTAL CHECKS
217,406.81
VQtJCHREZ
03/16/95
1A:?.6
CiTY OF TBeCULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOIl ALL PERIODS
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
100 GAS TAX FUND
165 RDA DEV- LOU/140D GET ASIDE
190 CORNUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
191 TC$1) SERVICE LEVEL A
19~ TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEHENT PROJ FUND
280 REDEVELOPHENT AGENCY - CIP
300 [NSIJP, JkNCE FUND
[IIFORHATION SYSTEMS
330 SUPPORT SERVICES
.TOTAL
/k8,199.27
/,0,977.63
1,000.00
12,413.62
116.88
1,933.19
5Z3.gA
50.00
230,00
2,665
/,39.41
108,549.41
BARE
POSTRASTER
RIVERSIDE CO. DEPT. OF
H]LLCE~ CONTRACTING,
HILLCREST CONTRACTING,
A & N SIONS
A N BEST CClIPANY, INC.
AT&T-VAN BUYS
AT&T'VAN BUYS
A T & T -VANNUYS
AIRTOUCH CELLULAR CORP.
APPLE ONE, INC.
ASC~ HASLER RAILING SY
BEIJING LONGEVITY, INC.
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR
NUHBER DATE NIJI4BER
22..~0 03/0~/g5 000253
22~91 03/0~/~5 O013~5
226~2 03/14/~5 o016r~,
22692 03/14/95 0016~
22696 03/16/95
22697 03/16/95 001523
22698 03/16/95 001895
22698 03/16/95 001895
22698 03/16/95 001895
22699 03/16/95 001425
22700 03/16/95 000101
22701 03/16/95 0o0195
~ 03/16/95 001876
22703 03/16/95 000679
22703 03/16/95 000679
2270z, 03/16/95 000702
22705 03/16/95 000128
22706 03/16/95 001054
22707 03/16/95 000790
22?08 03/16/95 000152
22709 03/16/95 000950
C11~ OF TENECULA
VOUCHEll/CHECK It~ISTER
Flit ALL latltll31~
ITEN
DESCRIPTION
RASS RAIL OF DEVEL. CCI)E
SEPTIC SYSTE!I PLAN CK-FIRE STA
PROGRESS PNT FOR JAN 95
RETENTION V/H ON INVt 2713
REFUND OVRPNT ON NSF CK
PROPERTY/CASUALTY RATING GUIDE
730 373 7109 001 LONG DIST SER
730 373 7992 001 LONG DIST SER
730 373 8000 01 LONG DIST SER
LA 601520230195 TH
TENP HELP V/E 2/18 GUTTOR
POSTAGE NETER RENTAL
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
BOGRAPHICS PRINTING PLU BUSINESS CARDS-GINNY RUND
BOGRAPHIC$ PRINTING PLU TAX
CADDY GRAPHICS
CAL'SURANCE ASSOCIATES,
CALIFORNIA GUILDING OFF
CALIFORNIA DEPT OF PEST
CALIFORNIA PARKS & RECR
CALIFORNIAN, INC.- DISP
22710 03/16/95 001270 CITY-VIDE ELECTRORIC SY
22711 03/16/95 00(X89 CONB ORGUP, THE
22712 03/16/95 001535 CREEKSIDE TEXACO, INC.
22713 03/16/95 001233 DAN'S FEED & SEED, INC.
22714 ~3/16/95 001029 DATAgJICK, INC.
22715 03/16/95 oo0155 DAVLIN
03/16/95 001673 DIVERSIFIED TENPORARY S
EASTER BROCHUER TYPEGRAPHY
ACCOUNT
001-161-999-5230
o01-171-999-5~70
lo0-16~-601-5402
100 - 2035
001-2640
001-140-999-5228
320-199-999-5208
320 - 199 - 999 - 5208
320-199-999-5208
:520-199-999-5208
330-199-999-5118
330-199-999-5239
190-183-999-5330
190-180-999-5220
190-180-999-5220
190-18~-999-5370
INSURANCE FOR ICAMASAKI NOTORCY 300-199-~-5201
FUB:CA NON-RESID DISABLE ACRES
LICENSE RENEMAL-LATE PENALTY
PUB:BENEFITS-BASED APPRCACH
CORSTRUCTION-UPDATE ADVERTSHNT
SR CNTR ANNUAL FIRE ALARM INSP
INSIDE NETMARE SUBSCRIPTIOR
VEHICLE RAINT. PUB.VORKS
PROPANE GAS FOR FIELD TANKS
FEB ACCESS SERVICE
PLANNING CDNN AUDIO TAPE 3/6
TENP HELP VIE 3/5 FRITCHEY
100-16~-604-5228
190-180-999-5226
190-180-999-5228
001-165-999-5254
190-181-999-5230
$20-199-999-5228
lo0-164-601-5214
100-164-601-5218
320-199-999-5250
o01-16~-9;J)9-5250
001-161-999-5118
ITBI
ANOUNT
2,1o0.o0
246.o0
/,4,663.65
4,466.39-
5.o0
95.o0
.26
.41
.13
65.81
153,51
124.00
31.88
2.47
110.o0
230.00
49.50
10.o0
28,00
66.20
62.50
56./,5
15.19
85.24
153.34
361.20
PAGE
CHE~
ANOUNT
2,1~,o0
2~.o0
40,'1~.~
5.00
95.o0
65.81
153.51
23~.~
1~.00
~.35
110,00
49.50
10.~
62.50
56.&5
15.19
85.~
153.~
~1.20
VOUCHRE2
03/16/95
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
22717
22718
22719
22720
22721
22722
22722
22723
22724
22724
2272/*
22724
2272/*
22725
22725
22725
22725
22727
22728
2272~
22730
22731
22732
22733
22733
22733.
2273/,
22735
1/*:26
CHECK
DATE
03/16/95
03/16/95
03/16/95
03/16/95
03/16/95
o3/16/95
o3/16/95
03/16/95
03/16/95
03/16/95
03/16/95
03/16/95
03/16/95
03/16/95
03/16/95
03116195
03/16/95
03/16/95
03116195
03/16/95
03/16/95
o3/16/95
03/16/95
03/16/95
03/16/95
03/16/95
03/16/95
03/16/95
03116195
03/16/95
03/16/95
03/16/95
VENI)OIt
le. IIBER
0014.82
Q01722
0Q0165
00018~
000184
00018/:.
001355
00017'7
Q00177
000177'
000177
000177
000178
000178
000178
000178
001186
000203
000206
000206
000206
000206
001329
00020~
VENDGR
M
DUNBAR-fiN CORPOeAT!Oti
ED~RI)S, SALLY
FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC.
FIELDS, DARILYN
FURGIUELE, VIVIAN
G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYH
G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM
G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM
G T E CALIFORNIA, INC.
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNXE$ OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNXES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNZES OFFICE PROOUCT
GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENN[ES OFFICE PRODUCT
GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO
GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO
GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO
GOLDEH STATE TRADING CO
HAHXLTON, LINDA
HANSON, SCOTT
HART, KATHERINE
HOUSE OF FABRICS
INTERNATIONAL ASSOC. OF
IRVIN, JOHN
JOgS AVAILABLE, INC.
KINKO'S OF RIVERSIDE,
KINKO'S OF RIVERSIDE,
KINKO'S OF RIVERSIDE,
KINKO~S OF RIVERSIDE,
KOHLItOAS, JEANETTE
L & H FERTILIZER, INC.
CITY OF TB~IXJLA
VOUCNEP./CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL ITcRIGOS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
REPAIRPOLICE SIREN
TCSi) INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
EXPRESS NAIL SERVICE
REFUND FOR TC$1) CLASS
REFUND FOR TCSD CLASS
909 69~-6~00 tin
9o9 695-3539 GEN
909 699-2309 GIN
140NTHY ACCESS CHARGES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
HISC OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES TCSD
· THERBOARD DX2-66 OK
IDE HARD DR[VE
FREIGHT
TAX
REFUND FOR TCSD CLASS
REFUND FOR OVRP~T PRK CITATION
REFUli) FOR TCSD CLASS
SUPPLIES FOR CRAFT CLASS
PUB:NAT ELECT CODE FOR PW
TCSD INSTRUCTON EARNINGS
REClIUIT FOR SIt MGliT ANALYST
STATIONERY CARDSTOCK
CLEAR COVER SHEETS
STATIONARY CARDSTOCK
COLON TRANSPARENCIES
TCSO INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
HISC. SUPPLIES/EQUiP.
ACCOUNT
HUMBER
001-170-999-5250
190-183-999-5330
320-199-999-5230
190-183-/,980
:*:~:.~:.
190-183-&f82
*r*
320-199-999-5Z08
320-199-~-5208
320-199-999-5208
320-
001-170J~9-5220
001 - 161-99~-5220
001 - 161-999-5220
001-1/*0-999-5220
001 - 161-999-5220
1~0-180--999-5220
320-19~-999-5221
320-199-~-5221
320-199-999-5221
320-199-~9~-5221
199-183-/.982
001-170~/*055
190-183-/*~82
1~0-183-999-5320
100-16/*-60~-5228
190-183-~-5330
001-150-99~-5254.
330-199-W9-5220
330-199-999-5220
001-161-999-5222
001 - 161 -~-5222
199-103-999-5330
100-1~4-601-5218
ITBI
NI)UNT
89.05
22.10
37.00
20.00
52/,. 15
33.71
350.00
15.51
261.65
32.26
23.52
163.10
35.76
580.00
220.00
12,00
62.00
50.00
15.00
50,00
55.15
785
21
29.31
7.28
8.21
672.00
CHECK
:89.05
~4.DD
22.10
37.Q0
20.00
591.60
350.0o
36.00
50.00
15.00
50.QO
55.15
/05.60
72.00
66.6/,
672. O0
CITY OF TBIECULA
14:z6 vanwc cK us.Tn -;' ;!-
FoR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOft ITEM ACCOUNT
RUMBER DATE NtJMBER MAME DESCRIPTION IKleER
ITEM
aT
Pm3
CNECK
ANQUNT
22736 0)/16/~5 001607 L D D S aMIIIICATIOIdS, FEB LONG DIST SERVla:
320-199-~9-5208
58.80
22737 03/16/95 0015~ LA MASTERS OF FIlE TRAV COMF:YR OF THE FNIILY:LINDEIMN 0O1-100-999-5258
21&.DO
22738 03/16/95 000596 LEAGUE OF CAL. CITIES CORF:ECOROMIC DEVEL;S.NELSON 190-180-999-5258
22739 03/16/95 000669 LEAGUE OF CAL. CITIES COMF:CI311JNITY SERVICES 4/5-7 190-180-999-5258
205.0O
800.00
22740 03/16/95 001199 LEAGUE OF CAL. CITIES
22740 03/16/95 001199 LEAGUE OF CAL. CITIES
CONF:PLJkNHERS INSTITUTE 3/22-4 · 001-161-999-5258
COlIF:PLANNERS INSTITUTE 3/22-4 001-161-999-5272
22741 03116195 001513 LIBERTY AUTO CENTER VEHICLES REPAIR & IlliT
001-162-999-5214
255.52
255.52
22742 03/16/95 000653 LUCICY STORE, INC. COOKIE IIOMSTER CLASS StJPPLIES 10O-18~-999-53Z0
22743 03/16/95 001692 M P SIGNS VEHICLE HARKINGS FOR FIRE TRUC 0O1-171-999-5214
30.0O
415.0O
30.OO
415.0O
227/4 03/16/95 001142 HARKHN4 & ASSOCIATES PItOF. SERVICES FEB. 1995 10O-16~-603-5268
-.
22745 03/16/95 000219 MARTIN 1-HOUR PHOTO PHOTO DEVELOPING FOR CIP 0O1:165-999-5250
.~ 03/16/95 000219 MARTIN 1-HOUR PHOTO PHOTO DEVELOPING FOR P,W, 100~T64-601-5250
' 03/16/95 000219 HARTIN 1-HOUR PHOTO PHOTO DEVELOPING; P,M. 001-163-999-5250
227~6 03/16/95 000883 HONTELEORE EXCAVATING EMERGENCY tJORK DUE TO RAINS 001-166-099-5401
227~6 03/16/95 000883 NONTELEONE EXCAVATING EMERGENCY t4ORK DUE TO RAINS OO1-166-.'q;x)9-5601
22746 03/16/95 000883 MONTELEORE EXCAVATING EHERSENCY 1,40eK DUE TO RAINS 001-166:'-x~-5602
22746 03/16/95 000883 M(NITELEORE EXCAVATING EMERGENCY MORK DUE TO RAINS 001-166-999-5/,01
227~6 03/16/95 000883 HONTELEONE EXCAVATING EMERGENCY iICIK DUE TO RAINS 0O1-166-999-.%01
22766 03/16/95 000883 MGNTELEONE EXCAVATING EMERGENCY WORK DUE TO RAINS 001-166-999-5401
· 57.45
27.~
10.~
3,336.49
4,3?0.00
1,964.55
10,660.0O
11,732.0O
7,356.60
57.45
39,419.~
22747 03/16/95 000775 HUNIHETRIX STSTBIS CORP ANNUAL HAINT Cl ~ASE SYSTEM
22747 03/16/95 000775 HUNIMETRIX SYSTEMS CORP ANNUAL HAINT CI RECORDS fiGHT
320-199-999-5211
320-199-999-5211
300.00
180.00
~80.00
22748 03/16/95 000?..33 NELSON, SHARON
CORF:CA b'"d RECREATION 3/1-4/95 190-180-999-5258
22749 03/16/95 001561
22749 03/16/95 001561
22749 03116195 001561
22749 03/16/95 001561
22749 03/16/95 001561
22749 03/16/95 001561
22749 03/16/95 001561
22749 03/16/95 001561
22750 03116/95 000359
22751 03/16/95 000249
22751 03/16/95 000249
22751 03/16/95 000249
P 03/16/95 000249
03/16/95 000249
PAGENET - PAGING NETM)R
PAGENET - PAGING NETt, IOR
PAGENET - PAGING NETM)R
PAGENET - PAGING NETkIOR
PAGENET - PAGING HETkIOR
PAGENET - PAGING HEllJOR
PAGENET - PAGING NETNOR
PAGENET - PAGING NEI'IJ(Nt
PARICER, HERMAN
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PAGER SERVICE FOR FEB 95
PAGER SERVICE FOR FEB 95
PAGER SERVICE FOR FEB95
PAGER SERVICE FOR FEB 95
PAGER SERVICE FOR FEB 95
PASER SERVICE FOR FEB 95
PAGER SERVICE FOR FEB95
PAGER SERVICE FOR FEB 95
CONF:CA SV RECEEATIOR 3/1-4/95
PETTY CASH REIMB,
PETTY CASH REill.
PETTY CASH REIlI.
PETTY CASH REIMB,
PETTY CASH REIMB.
001-162-gfg-5Z38
190-180-999-5238
190-180-999-5238
001-100-999-5250
001 - 170-999-5242.
001-163-999-5250
100-164-601-5238
001 - 165-999-5Z38
19o-la~-99~-525a
· ,. · ,i.,~
oO1-163-999-5262
oO1-162-999-522o
0Ol -166-999-5250
oO1-15o-999-526o
001-1/,0-999-5260
22.50
80.18
22.50
30.0O
15.0O
15 .(X)
7.50
28.76
31.90
19.Q4
50.49
3.00
20.0O
VOUClfftE2
03116195
VOUCHER/
CHECK
~R
22752
22753
2?,753
22753
22754
22754
22754
22755
22756
22756
22756
22757
22758
22759
22760
22761
22761
22762
22763
2276~
22763
22763
22764
22765
22765
22765
22765
22765
22765
22765
22765
22765
22765
14:26
CHECK
DATE
03/16/95
03/16/95
03116195
03/16/95
03/16/95
83/16/95
03/16/95
03/16/f5
03/16/95
03/16/95
03/16/95
03/16/95
03/16/95
C)3/16/95
03/16/95
03/16/95
03/16/95
03/16/95
03/16/95
03/16/95
03/16/95
03/16/95
03/16/95
03/16/95
03/16/95
03/16/95
03/16/95
83/16/95
83/16/95
03/16/95
03/16/95
03/16/95
03/16/95
03/16/95
03/16/95
03/16/95
03116195
NUMBER
000249
0002/,9
000249
0O02/,9
000580
000253
0OO253
OO0253
O00Z5~
000254
000254
000795
000262
000262
000262
001896
001046
000352
000~18
00O678
000678
000/*99
000537
000537
000537
000537
000926
000375
900375
OOO375
OOO375
000375
008375
OOO375
000375
OO0375
OOO375
M
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PHOTOUORKS
POSTHASTER
POSTRASTER
POSTRASTER
PRESS'ENTERPRISE COI4PAN
PRESS-ENTERPRISE CONPAN
PRESS-ENTERPRISE CONPAN
PRYOR RESOURCES, INC.
RANCHO CALIFORNIA VATER
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER
RESOLUTION TRUST CORP.
REXON, FREEDffiU/, KLEPET
RIVERSIDE C0. ASSESSOR
RIVERSIDE CO. CLERK AMD
RIVERSIDE CO. HEALTH SE
RIVERSIDE IX). HEALTH SE
SCCCA
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON -
SOUTHERN CALIF BISON -
SOUTHERN CALIF BISON -
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON -
SOUTHERN CALIF B)ISON -
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPNOIi
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPNON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPNON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPItON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPNON
SOUTHERN CAL]F TELEPNON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPNON
CITY OF I'EI~CULA
VQUCNERICHECK REGISTEIt
FOR ALL PEelCOS
ITEN
DESCRIPTION
PETTY CASH REIMB.
PETTY CASH REIII.
PETTY CASH REIll.
PETTY CASH REIMB.
FILM & DEVELOPING
EXPRESS RAIL SERVICE
EXPRESS RAIL SERVICE
EXPRESS RAIL SERVICE
RECRUITlENT ADVERTISING
RECIKIITtENT ADVERTISING
PUBLIC NOTICE AD
gKSHP: GRNI4ER/USASE; WIMBERLY
WATER SERVICE FOR 1/1-2/Z3/95
MATER SERVICE FOR 1/1-2/23/~5
MATER SERVICE FOR 1/1-2/23/95
RANCHOMEST APARTMENTS
PROF. SERVICES FOe FEB 95
RAP COPIES FROH COUNTY
APERTURE CARDS DUPLICATES
HEALTH PERMIT i RANCHO VISTA
HEALTH PERMIT 8 PALONA DEL SOL
REDEVIL-CITY CLERK ASSOC-OREEK
ELECT SERVICE FOR 1/1-2/23/95
ELECT SERVICE FOR 1/1-2/r1/95
ELECT SERVICE FOR 1/1-2/23/95
ELECT SERVICE FOR 1/1-2/23/95
INSTALL ELECT FACILILIT[ES
909202-4765 BB
909 202-4764 BB
909 202-4769 JS
909 202-420/, KL
909 202-4762 RP
909 202-4758 RR
909 283-407014JM
909 202-4770RB
909 202-~757 JG
909 202-4760 JH
ACCCUMT
190-180-9~9-5220
190-181-999-5301
901-120-999-5250
lOO-182;999-5301
901-16~-9~-5260
190-1990
001-120~999-5230
001-161'999'5230
001-150-999-5254
001-150-999'525~
001 - 161-999-5256
001-161-999-5258
190-180-999-52~0
191-180-999-52/.0
193-180-999-52/,0
165;1652
001-130-999-5247
190-180-999-5220
001-163-999-52Z0
190-182-999-5250
190-18b-Wg-525o
ool - 12o,99~- 5258
193-180-9~9-52/*0
190-18Q-999-52/*0
190-182-999-52/*0
191-180-999-5319
210-165-642-580/,
100-164-601-5208
1900-164-901-5290
001-1OO-999-5208
001-100499-5208
001-100-999-5208
001-100-999-5208
001-110-f99-5208
001 - 110-999-5208
001-120-999-5208
100-164-603-5208
1TEN
N!OUNT
8.O6
34.40
43.08
102.21
32.64
21.50
30.OO
125.90
83.82
53.2~
3OO.ll
1,000.00
175.90
10.00
5.00
326.OO
326.OO
25.00
1,624.OO
61.17
7,353.O6
63.64
89.88
102.45
64.97
~8.79
99.46
75.03
1/*~.24
65 .~8
6~ .35
12L61
CRECK
N~OUMT
312.18
"32.64
*. lOO.90
4,~.17
175.00
10o00
5.00
9,102.75
523.9~
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENI)OIt
NLNBER DATE I&NBER
22765 00/16/95 000.375
22765 (13116/95 000375
22765 03/16/95 000375
22765 03/16/95 000375
22765 03/16/95 000375
22765 03116195 000375
22?65 03/16/95 000375
22765 C)3/16/95 000375
22765 03/16/95 000375
22765 03/16/95 000375
22765 03/16/95 000375
22765 03/16/95 000375
22765 03/16/95 000375
22765 03/16/95 000375
22766 03/16/95 000291
22767 03/16/95
22768 03/16/95 001497
,r- ', 03/16/95 000168
22770 03/16/95 000905
22770 03/16/95 000905
22771 03/16/95 000307
22772 03/16/95
22773 03/16/95 000326
22774 03/16/95 001209
2277A 03/16/95 00120~
2277~ 03/16/95 001209
22776 03/16/95 00120~
22776 03/16/95 001209
22774 03/16/95 001209
22775 03/16/95 001637
22776 03/16/95 001890
22777 03/16/95 000339
22778 03/16/95 000~6
22T/~ 03/16/95
VENDOR
SOUTHERN CALZF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALZF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CAL[F TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CAL[F TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CAL[F TELEPHON
$OlJTHERN CAL[F TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALZF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CAL[F TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALZF TELEPHON
SPEE DEE OZL CHANGE & T
SPORTS TURF NANAGERS AS
T R W, INC.-INFORNATION
TEMECULA FLOtdER CORRAL
TENECULA SHUTTLE SERVIC
TENECLILA SHUTTLE SERVIC
TENECULA TROPHY CO.
TOP TO BOTTON JANITORIA
UNZTOG RENTAL SERVICE,
VAULT INC., THE
VAULT INC., THE
VAULT ]NC., THE
VAULT ]NC., THE
VAULT INC., THE
VAULT INC., THE
VIRACK, HARYANN
VORTEX DOORS
gEST PUBLISHING CONPANY
gltITEHEAD, RHONDA
MHITFIELD, JEFFREY
CITY OF TBIECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOg ALL PERIODS
ITEN
DESCRIPTIOR
909 202-4752 SN
909 202-4756 IOITN
CELLULAR TELEPHONE
BATTERY CILARGER/CONDITIOgER
BATTERY EXTENDED LIFE
POgER ADAPTER CORD
TAX
MOTOROLA CELLULAR PHONE
BATTERY CHARGER/CONDITIOgER
BATTERY EXTENDED LIFE
POMER ADAPTER CORD
TAX
REPLACENEHT BATTERY - CELLULAR
TAX
VEHICLE REPAIR & NAINT.
HEHBERSHIP FOR K.HARRINGTOR
RDA CREDIT REPORTS SERVICE
FLOMERS FOR L. RONERO
SHUTTLE FOg J.STORE 3/2/95
SHUTTLE FOg J. NIHESCIEH
PLA~UE FOR RICK SAYRE
CORF:CARPET CLEANING;R.CAMBRID
UNIFOgMS HAINT FOg Pg
DATA STORAGE CARTRIDGE CTNR
NICROIK)X
APERTURE CARD BOX
LEASED CTNR/INSERT CONTAINER
MICROBOX
APERTURE CARD BOX
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
REPAIRS TO CEC STEEL FIRE DOOR
CALIF. CODE I. Rq)ATES
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
REFUND OF NON-RESIDENT FEE
TOTAL CHECKS
AC_e~3e__NT
litleER
190-180-~-5208
320-1ff-~q~-5208
001-100-~-5208
001-100-999-52Og
001-100-~-5208
001-100-~-5208
001-100-999-5200
001
'001-100-999-5200
0001-10~;~-5200
001 - 100:999-5208
001 - 100-W9-5208
001 - 162-~-5200
001 - 162-999-5208
001-162-~-5216
190-180- ~-5226
280-199-999-5250
001-10C-~-5258
190-180.-999-5258
001-100-9~-5265
-190-180-9~-5261
100-1~.-601-5243
:
001-120;.999-5250
001-12~-~-5250
001-126-;,~)9-5250
001-120-~-5250
001-120-999-5250
001-120-999-5250
190-183-~-5330
190-182-9f9-5212
001 - 120-999- 5228
lfO- 183-999-5330
190-183-6994
[TEN
8A.11
38.12
99.00
49.00
67.00
25.00
18.60
99.00
49.00
67.00
25.00
18.60
3.72
14.5~
50.00
50.00
67.00
170.96
15.00
150.00
3.34
16.70
20.00
2.00
10.00
228.00
100.00
102.34.
176.00
10.00
PA;E 5
CHECK
1,530.41
14
75.00
50.00
117.00
170.96
15.00
100.00
102.34
176.00
10.00
100,549.61
vOUcHRE2
CITY OF TBIECULA
VOUCHER/ClIEClC REGISTEll
FOR ALL PERICI)S
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
100 GAS TAX FI,II~
190 COMIt/M]TY SERVICES DISTRICT
19) TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
210 CAPITAL IMPROVENEHT PROJ FUND
Z80 REDEVELOPNENT AGENCY - CIP
320 /NFORNATION SYSTEMS
390 TCS~ DEBT SERVZCE
TOTAL
aT
301,117.15
1
1,635.00
225.00
285,820.58
6,190.50
1,2~0.11
2,628.56
600,61~.35
PA~ 1
16:59
CITY OF TBiCULA
VGUCIER/CECK IEGISTEIt
FOB ALL PBtlQOS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK: WND(3R VEIII)(Xt
IILIIBER I)ATE IB.IIBER NANE
ITEI4 ACCOUNT ITL=N CHECk:
DESCIUPTION ~ER AMOUIIT AROUIIT
ABSOLUTE ASPHALT, INC.
ABSOLUTE ASPHALT, INC.
ABSOLUTE ASPHALT, INC.
50 LB BAGS ABPIIALT 100-16&-601-5218 1,556.80
FREIGHT 100-16~-601-5218 50.00
TAX 100-16~-601-5218 120.65
**
1,727.65
?2.785 0317.8195 001168 RAMK OF ABlERIrA
SERVICES AS TRUSTEE,PAY AGENT 390-199-999-5227 2,628.56
2,628.56
22786 03/28/95 0004~7 COHTRONIX OF HENET
22786 0:5128195 000~47 COIITRONIX OF HEIET
22786 0:5/28/95 0004~7 CCNTRONIX OF HENET
22786 03/28/95 00O447 COMTRONIX OF HEtET
22786 0:5/28/95 000~7 CONTROtilX OF'HEleET
22786 0:5/28/95 000647 CONTItONIX OF HENET
22786 0:5/28/95 000/~7 CCMTRONIX OF HENET
22786 0:5/28/95 000~7 CONTItONIX OF NEIET
22786 0:5/28/95 000~7 COHTRONIX OF HEMET
PMR SUPPLY 320-199-999-5209 209.00
CASE 320-199-999-5209 69. O0
DESK MIC 320-199-999-5209 79.00
LOW LOBS CABLE ~20-199-999-5209 100.00
ANTENNA 320-199-999-5209 176.80
MISC HARDMAREI140UNT ~20-199-999-5209 125.00
PRQGRAMM! NG 320-199-999-5209 52.50
INSTALLATION LABOR :520-199-999-5209 600.00
TAX 320-199-999-5209 58.81
1,270.11
22~7 03128195 0016~
22~7 03128195 001695
22788 03128195 000756
22/1~8 03128195 000756
03128195 001608
22790 03128195 000481
EDNONDSON CONSTRUCTION
EDNONDSON CONSTRUCTION
ELLIOTT GROUP, THE
ELLIOTT GROUP, THE
ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL S
GEOTECHN[CAL & ENVIRONN
FEB 95 PROGRESS PMT
RETENTION WH ON 1NWAt758-1-95
PRK PLAN CHECK REVIEk'$ FEB 95
PRK PLAN CHECK REVIEI4S FEB 95
JOB COHPLETE-~ETENTION DUE
PHASE I SITE ASSESSENT
210-165-&41-580~ 68,600.00
210-20:55 6,8&0.00-
1~0-180-.~-5250 1,635.00
193-180-999-5250 225.00
001-20:55 5,860.00
280-1~-~q~-5268 1,800.00
6:5,760.00
-.
1,860,00
5,8~0.00
1,800.00
22791 0:5128195 000520 H D L COREH & CONE, IWC ESTABLISH PROPERTY DATABASE 001-160-999-52/,8 6,800.00
6,800.00
22792 0:5128195 001207 HARTIN J. JASKA, INC. FEB 95 CONTRACTOR SERVICES 210-190-120-5804 210,650.00
22792 03/28/95 001207 HARTIN J. JASKA, INC. FEB 95 CONTRACTON SERVICES 210-1g0-120-5806 16,889.00
22792 03/28/95 001207 HARTIN J. JASKA, ]NC. FEB 95 CONTRACTOR SERVICES 210-1~0-120-5804, 3,276.00
22792 03/28/95 001207 NART[N J. JASKA, INC. RETENTION M/H ]NW/REQUEST 7 210-2035 25,382.60-
22792 03/28/95 001207 HARTIN J. JASKA, INC. FEB 95 CONTRACTOR SERVICE COW4 210-1g0-120-5804 23,376.00
22792 03/28/95 001207 HARTIN J. JASKA, INC. FEB 95 CONTRACTON SERVICES 210-190-120-580~ 16,889.00-
22792 0:5/28/95 001207 RARTIH J. JASKA, INC. FEB 95 CONTRACTON SERVICES 210-1g0-120-580~ :5,276,00-
210,~63.60
2279:5 03128195 001585 PAUL GARDNER CORPORATIO TRAFFIC SIGNAL i MINCHESTER RD 210-165-646-5806
22793 03/28/95 001585 PAUL GARDNER CORPORATIO RETENTION M/H INV# 96313-2 210-2035
9,?2:5.OO
972.30-
8,750.70
22796 03/28/95 001695 PRO-CIVIL ENGINEERING, PALA RD PROGRESS PMT FEB 95 210-165-652-5804 16,802.91
227~6 03/28/95 001695 PRO-CIVIL ENGINEERING, RETENTION U/H INV# 1262 210-2035 1,/k80.29-
13,322.62
227~5 0)128195 000967 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C BLUEPRINT REPRO. IN96-OTCSD 210-190-1:57-5802
22796 03128/95 0004,06 RIVERSIDE CO. SHER/FF'S JAN 95 LAW ENFORCEMENT 001-170-999-5288 176,706.8/,
22796 03/28/95 000606 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF"S JAN 95 LAU ENFORCENENT 001-170-999-5298 11,872.80
22796 03/28/95 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S JAN 95 LAg ENFORCElENT 001-1707999-5290 5,366.7:5
22796 03/28/95 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S JAN 95 LAU ENFOBCEHENT 001-170~999-5291 3,060.34
22796 03/28/95 000/,06 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S JAN 95 ~ ENFONCEIENT 001-170-999-5282 1,672.80
~ 0:5/28/95 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S JAN 95 LAg ENFORCEHENT 001-170-999-5299 28,898.60
0:5/28/95 000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S JAN 95 LAg ENFORCEliNT 001-170-999-529~ 8,978.85
VOUCHRE:~
03/16/95
VOIJCHER/
CHECK
NUllBEe
22796
22796
227~
22796
227V7
22797
22797
?.27V7
227'~7
22798
22799
16:59
CHECK
DATE
03128195
03/28195
03128195
03128/95
03128/95
03128195
03128195
03128195
03128/95
0:3128/95
O3/28/95
0014~3
0014,83
001A83
0014,~
001~,83
000621
0005~9
ILUIE
RIVERSIDE IX). SHERIFF'S
RIVERSIDE CO, SHERIFF'S
RIVERSIDE CO, SHERIFF'S
RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S
TON DODSON & ASSOCIATES
TON DOO SON & ASSOCIATES
TON DOBSON & ASSOCIATES
TOH DODSON & ASSOCIATES
TON DODSOIi & ASSOCIATES
k'ESTERN RIVERSIDE COLIC
UIHI4ER YARADA ASSOCIATE
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOIJCHER/CNECIC REGISTBt
FOR ALL PERIGI)S
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
JAN f5 LAid ENFORCB4ENT
jAN 95 LAU ENFORCENENT
jAN ~5 LAt/ENFORCBENT
DEC ~, BOOKING FEE
PREPARE ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY
PREPARE ENVIRONNEMTAL STUDY
PREPARE ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY
PREPARE ENVEROII4ENTAL STUDY
RLrTENTZON~/H INVBU-050-8
DUES FOe FY 9~-95
PROGRESS PHT FOe FEB 95
TOTAL CHECKS
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-170-999-5262
001-170-999-5281
001-1230
001-170-999-5273
280-199-999-52/,8
280-1270
280-199-999-52/,8
280-12/0
280-2035 ..
001-100-999-5226
210-190-120-5802
ITBI
ANOUliT
1A.646.89
17.18A.17
3,060.33
10.708.80
2.206.02
2.206.02
216.4~8
216./,8
454.50'
8,500.00
7,725.00
CHECI(
ANOINT
:
281,957.15
: ~,,390.50
8,500.00
7,725.00
600,616.35
ITEM 4
APPROVA
CITY ATTORNEY
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Anthony Elmo, Chief Building OfficiaF"~
March 28, 1995
Public Nuisance Abatement - 30301 Nicolas Rd
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council set a public hearing for April 25,
1995, at 7:00 p.m. at 30875 Rancho Vista Rd., for the purpose of confirming the cost to the
City for the abatement of a public nuisance at 30301 Nicolas Rd. ;
DISCUSSION: On approximately May 11, 1993, Code Enforcement
received a complaint regarding an alleged public nuisance located at 30301 Nicolas Rd. After
inspection of the premises revealed the existence of weeds, trash, debris, and unsecured
dilapidated buildings, abatement proceedings were initiated in accordance with the provisions
of Ordinance 90-24 for Public Nuisance Abatement. Notices were subsequently sent to all
known owners by both first class and certified mail.
In an effort to determine the extent of the nuisance condition, an inspection warrant was
applied for and granted by the local district court judge. An inspection was then performed
revealing construction debris, concrete foundations, trash and debris throughout the property.
As a result of this inspection, staff proceeded to declare the property a public nuisance,
requesting that the nuisance be abated in a timely fashion. Upon expiration of the requested
abatement period, a hearing was held before an independent hearing officer which resulted in
the City being given the authority to cause the abatement of the nuisance condition. Staff
obtained the required abatement warrant and has subsequently caused the property to be
cleared of all nuisance conditions. The total cost of abatement of this property is $68,856.75.
A breakdown of costs which make up this total is as
follows:
Environmental Control Systems, Inc.
Attorney's fees
Administrative costs
Staff costs
58,600.00
8,297.64
525.00
1.434.11
Grand Total
$68,856.7
V:%TONY~,GENDA~30301-SE.PH 3/10/95 tie
Agenda Report
March 28, 1995
Page 2
RSCAL IMPACT: On October 12, 1994, Council approved an appropriation
of e58,600to account no. 001-162-999-5250,Other Outside Services, for the abatement of
the nuisance from the property. The additional attorney fees have been expended and
recorded the legal services department budget and the remaining administrative and staff cost
have been expended end recorded in the Building and Safety Department budget. These costs
will be offset through the recording of the special assessment against the property.
V:'~TONY%AGENDA~303OI-SE.PH 3110/16 tda
ITEM 5
APPROVAl
CITY ATTORNEY
RNANCE OFR~C~
CITY MANAG
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
City Council/City Manager
FROM:
Mary Jane McLarney, Assistant City Manager
DATE:
March 28, 1995
SUBJECT:
Professional Services Contract Renewal for Video Production Services
f
PREPARED BY:
Grant M. Yates, Human Resources Administrator
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council approve the attached professional services contract to Davlin for
audio/video production services.
BACKGROUND:
On August 24, 1993, the City Council awarded a contract for audio/video production services
to Davlin. The agreement provides for extensions and amendments by mutual consent on a
year-to-year basis through June, 1996.
Mr. Lines, owner of Davlin, indicates that costs associated with "live" broadcasts and newly
purchased equipment, (to improve the quality of productions), justifies an increase in the per
meeting costs for City Council and special sessions· Inland Valley Cable will remain
responsible for transmission and broadcast quality. Mr. Lines has proposed no increase in the
cost to produce audio-only tapes of Planning Commission meetings.
An additional issue which staff wished to factor into the agreement was the production,
editing, and insertion of program sponsorships into the City Council meeting programming.
Issues of exclusive production, copyright infringements, and cost of production were
discussed and resolved.
Mr. Lines and City staff propose to amend the agreement, as attached, which provides the
following:
An increase in per meeting payment for audio/video production of Council
meetings from ~700 to ~800; and
Instituting the sponsorship program, This program has the potential for paying
the full costs of the Dadin contract, Under the program gui.delines, the
opportunity is available for three primary sponsors, per meeting, totaling 8375
in sponsorship fees, In addition, two hourly sponsors are possible, totaling
~450 per meeting based on a three,hour meeting. This brings the total
sponsorship, per meeting, to ~825,
SoonsorshiD Rates - Rates for sponsorship of council meeting programming are set to cover
the cost of video taping. Rates may be adjusted as costs increase. The current rates are as
follows:
Primary Sponsors - $125 per meeting.
Hourly Sponsors - $ 75 per hour.
These "on-air" sponsorship rates shall be paid by the sponsor directly to the City.
The content of the sponsorships may not:
* Use a celebrity spokesperson.
* Use language or slogans that:
* are qualitative ("maker of the finest"),
* make superlative or comparative statements ( 'Temecula's largest retailer
of...'),
* are a call to action or inducement to buy ("visit our showroom, or
call...'),
include endorsements ('the choice of Chamber of Commerce .'
members...").
All production costs are the sole responsibility of the sponsor.
The contract is structured with Davlin being responsible for marketing this service. Because
the maximum sponsorship fee is ~825, there is a built-in incentive for Davlin to receive an
additional e25, per meeting, if all sponsorship slots are filled.
Staff has been working with Inland Valley Cablevision and Davlin to ensure a smooth transition
to "live" broadcasting. It is anticipated that we will be able to go live by April 25, 1995.
Currently, all City Council meetings are taped and retained on video. By moving to a "live"
format, tapes will no longer be necessary as a "live" broadcast will take the place of delayed
broadcasts. Davlin will capture the "live" meeting on tape for a Saturday morning
rebroadcast. In addition, staff is recommending that video tapes no longer be retained for
storage, as it is expensive to retain the tapes. A copy of the audio of the meeting will be
retained for permanent record storage.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The City is currently paying ~700 per meeting for audio/video production. The per meeting
base cost will increase by ~100 to a total of ~800 an~l up to ~825 if all sponsorship slots are
filled. However, the net cost to the City for production of Council broadcasts will be $0 if all
program sponsorship slots are filled.
R.~AI~iDA~TAJ~I2J~i~ ~
CITY OF TEMECULA
PROGRAM SPONSORSHIP GUIDELINES
Sponsorships for broadcast of programming initiated by the City of Temecula are subject to
the overall test of whether the sponsorship is consistent with the noncommercial character
of government access television.
Primary Sponsors -
Acknowledgements run at the beginning and end of programming. No
more than three primary sponsors will be permitted per program. A 10-
15 second message will be allowed for each sponsor.
Hourly Soonsore -
Acknowledgements run at the cpnclusion of each hour of programming.
No more than two sponsors may be acknowledged per hour of
programming. A 10-15 second message will be allowed for hourly
sponsors.
Soonsorshio Content -
(1)
The acknowledgement may consist of one or two photographs and/or character
generator graphics.
(2)
The acknowledgement may include name, address, and/or telephone number of the
sponsor.
(3)
Audio may be vocal or musical, as long as the sponsor adheres to all applicable
copyright infringent laws.
(4) Audio may state information on card, but must contain the following lead
announcement:
Primary Sponsors - "This governmental access program has been presented through
the assistance of... name, address, and telephone number).
Hourly Sponsors- "The preceding hour of governmental access programming has been
presented with the assistance of... name, address, and telephone number).
(5) The content may:
Describe your business, mentioning up to four target markets, products or
services,
Show one product or genetically depict up to four product lines
Show company employees as an alternative to product depiction
Use a company slogan (acceptable in most cases)
R:~t,.AND~.DA~frA!~I2.MIS ~
AMENDMENT TO
PROFESSIONAL'SERVICES AGREEMENT
THIS RRST AMENDMENT TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT is made and
entered, as of March 28, 1995, into by and between the CITY OFTEMECULA, a municipal
corporation ('City'), and DAVLIN, a sole proprietorship (Consultant'). In consideration of the
mutual covenants and promises contained herein the parties agree as follows:
1. Recitals - this amendment is made with respect to the following facts which the
parties agree are true and correct:
a. On July 1, 1993, the parties hereto entered into that certain agreement entitled
"Professional Services' whereby Consultant would parform certain specified
audio/video services for the City ('Agreement').
be
The parties desire to further amend the Agreement to additional services and '
revise the payment schedule as provided in this amendment. ..
2. Section 1, Services, and Exhibit A incorporated therein, of the Agreement are
hereby amended by adding the following services to Exhibit A:
'Produce, edit, and insert program sponsorships into programming for City
Council meetings at the rate provided in Section 4D.
'Provide services, equipment and personnel to produce and provide a 'live
feed" of City Council meetings for cable TV as directed.
"Consultant shall have the non-exclusive right to solicit sponsorships for
support of broadcasting of City Council meetings.
"Consultant shall produce and/or edit~ and insert all sponsorships into City
programming of City Council meetings. In connection with such services,
Consultant shall obtain all copyright licenses and/or other approvals as may be
required to broadcast the sponsorship.'
3. Section 3 - Payment, of the Agreement, is hereby amended to read as follows:
"Payment the City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, at the par
project/meeting rate set forth in Exhibit B, attached hereto. This amount shall
not exceed nineteen thousand, eight hundred dollars (e 19,800) per year unless
additional payment is approved by the City Council; provided, however, that the
City Manager may approve additional payment not to exceed ten percent (10%)
of the yearly maximum payment.'
City agrees to provide consultant with advanced notification of meeting
cancellation; however, if the City can not notify consultant of meeting
cancellation before 12:00 noon of meeting date, then City will compensate
consultant at a flat rate of $100.00.
4. Exhibit B to the Agreement as incorporated into Section 3 - Payment, is hereby
amended by deleting the schedule of payment set forth therein and adding the following
payment schedule: ~
R.-%LAI(2RDA~STAFF12.MI8 3~2J~
"City agrees to pay Consultant at the following par project/meeting rate:
A. Audio/video for City Council meetings and special meetings - ~800 per
meeting regardless of length;
B. Audio for Planning Commission meetings - ~ 150 par meeting regardless
.- of length;
C. Audio for other City Commission meetings ~125 per meeting
regardless of length;
D. Consultant agrees to charge program sponsors, both primary and hourly,
a mutually agreed upon fee, not/co exceed $100, to produce and or edit
and insert sponsorships into City programming of City Council meetings.
City shall not be responsible for the payment of this fee."
5. Section 6 - Termination of the Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows:
Termination - this agreement shall terminate on June 30, 1997 unless extended
by amendment of this Agreement.
6. Section 7 - Indemnification of the Agreement, is hereby amended by adding the
following sentence to the section:
"Consultant's indemnification of City as described in this Section specifically
includes indemnification for copyright infringement or unauthorized use of
copyrighted material."
7. Except as specifically provided herein, all other terms and conditions of the
Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Amendment as
of the date first written above.
CITY OF TEMECULA
Jeffrey E. Stone
Mayor
ATTEST:
June Greek
City Clerk
R:XLAIqII~J3A%ffA!~'I2.M~ ~
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter M. Thorson
City Attorney
DAVLIN
David C. Lines
R:~LAN~IDA~TAP~I2.M/S ~
ITEM 6
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF.TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
City Clerk
March 28, 1995
Records Destruction Approval
· 'APPROVAL ,
CITY ATTORNEY.
FINANCE OFFIC
CITY MAI~AGE
RECOMMENDATION: Approve scheduled destruction of certain records as provided
under the City of Temecula approved Records Retention Policy.
BACKGROUND: On March 22, 1992, the City Council approved Resolution No. 92-17
which authorizes the destruction of certain city records which have become outdated, obsolete
or are excess documents, in compliance with Sections 34090 through 34090.7 of the
Government Code.
The records management program, administered by the City Clerk's Office, is in the process
of microfilming all inactive records that are over two (2) years old. The attached exhibit
details plot plans for the years 1988 and 1989 which have been copied to microfilm. Three
microfilm copies have been prepared, one to be kept in the Planning Department, one in the
City Clerk's records vault and one in permanent off-site storage.
The City Attorney has reviewed this request and has signed Exhibit "1" of the Annual Review
as provided for in Resolution No. 92-17.
ATTACHMENTS:
JSG
Destruction of Records Request
List of Records recommended for destruction
DATE: Man:h 1,5, 1995
Attached is a print out of: Conditional Use Permit (Ret~fion Type 20308) from 1117/61 to
12/12/89; TmaZmrary Outdoor Use Permits (Rstmtion Type 20307) from 4/11/90 m 2/15/91;
Lot ~ Adjustment (Retention Typ~ 20312) from 4110181 to 12/18/90; Plot Plans (Rstention
Type 20324) from 1/19/88 to 10/13/92. These reinhis have boon microfilmed in triplicate
with a oopy distributed to the City Clerk's Re~ords Vault, the Planning Dep-d~ien~ and a
copy to the Vault in San Diego.
The following have reviewed and approved this destruction rsquest.
Pursuant to the rsquirsnents of Govmnn~ Cods Section 34090, I hereby give my oonsent
to the destm~tion of re~rds under the diregtion of the City Clerk pursuant to the City of
Temecula's adopted Destruction of Obsolete Records Policy. ~
City Attorney:
6 Planning Director
D~
UOESTY...RRO61 City ef Telan:aLe Doc. net ......... 161 Pep 1
03/07/199S FILes Beady. for Destruction btontlon Code... ~QSQe lh&O:4S
I)~tructim Date. 03/01/19gS
~ Item let. FILe Reference # Storage Nedia
~ Date Bet. Irief Description Cede hourtry CLass Itorege Location Location leference
161 01/17/1961 5)8 Conditional Use Permit 538 20308 Q019 FiLm 3821N1AQQQ1
Group i 161/120/The VauLt
161 12/15/1965 617 Conditional USe Permit 817 2030~ 0019 FiLm 3821N1AOOOl
P-to;; 161/120/The VauLt "
161 06/01/1966 aS& Conditional USe Permit 85& 20308 0019 FiLm )8~INIAOOOl
Group t 161/120/The VauLt
161 07/26/1966 870 CQrdtttormL Use Permit 870 20308 0019 FILm 3a~INI~OOOl
Gro; z 161/120/The VauLt
161 11/20/196? 966 Conditional Use Permit 9~6 ~0308 00t9 FILm )821NIAOOO1
atom ! 161/1!O/The VauLt
161 12/27/1967 969 Conditional Use Permit 969 ZQIQ8 0019 FiLm 3e~IN1AOOOl
Group I 161/120/The VauLt
161 0~/09/1968 9S3 Conditional Use Permit 983 20308 0019 FiLm 3821N1AOOOl
Group ! 161/120/The VauLt
161 06/11/1968 ~95 Conditional Use Permit 995 20308 0019 FiLm SaZlNIAOOOl
Group ! 161/120/The VauLt
1, J8/13/1908 1000 Conditional Use Permit 1000 ~OSO8 0019 FiLm 3821N1AOOOl
Gro; i 161/120/The VauLt
161 08/13/1968 1005 Conditional Use Permit 1005 20308 0019 FiLm 3821N1-a--m~--I
Group i 161/120frhe VauLt
161 09/11/1968 1006 Conditional USe Permit 1006 Z0308 0019 FiLm 38~IN1A0001
GPoup ! 161/120frhe VauLt
161 12/11/1968 1027 Conditional Use Permit 1027 ~ 0019 FiLm 3821NIAQ(X)1
Group ! 161/120/The VauLt
161 01/28/19~9 103~ Conditional Use Permit 10)~ 20306 0019 FiLm 3821NIAO001
Group ! 161/120/The VauLt
161 06/10/1~9 10~0 Conditional Use Permit 1060 ~)308 0019 FiLm 3821N1AOOOl
Group ! 161/120/The VauLt
161 10/26/1969 I0~) Conditional Use Permit 1090 20308 0019 FiLm 3821N1AOOOl
Group i 161/120/The VauLt
161 ~2/10/1969 1102 Conditional Use Permit 1102 20308 0019 FiLm 3821NIAO001
Group ! 161/120/The VauLt
16/1~-~01/27/1970 11(X Conditional Use Permit 110~ 20308 0019 FILB 3821N1AO001
Group I 161/120/The VauLt
161 03/10/1970 1127 Conditional Use Permit 1127 20308 0019 FiLB 3821NIAOO01
Group ! 161/120/The VauLt
mmESTY...RRQ61 City of TeascaLe Page 2
QS/O7/le95 FILe. le"dy far Deetructlen lh&Q:&S
Doc. Item let. FILe Reference · Storage liedie
Rot. Date Rot. Brief Descripttan Code Security CLue Storage Locitim Lacetim Bell /
161 10116/197Q 1208 Conditional LIme Permit 1208 2031)8 QQ19 FiLm 3281N1AIXX)l
Group I 161/12Q/The VauLt
161 11/10/1971) 122Q Conditional Use Permit 1220 20308 QQ19 FILm 3821NINX)Q1
Group ! 161/120rrhe VauLt
161 01/27/1971 12/,7 Conditional Use Permit 1247 20308 0019 FiLm 3821NIAO001
Grot; ! 161/120/The VauLt
161 0A/27/1971 129& Conditional Use Permit 129~ 20308 0019 FiLm 3821NIAO001
Group ! 161/120/The VauLt
161 07/27/1971 1173 Conditional Use Permit 1173 20308 QQ19 FILm 3821NIAQQQ1
Group ~ 161/120/Th, VauLt
161 02/Q2/1972 1369 Conditional Use Permit 1369 20308 Q019 FiLm 3821N1AQQQ1
Group [ 161/12Q/The VauLt
161 11/~9/1972 1/~9U Conditional Use Permit 1~9-V ~N}3(}8 0019 FILm ~1N1AO001
Group z 161/12Q/The vault
161 03/01/1973 1505k/Condftiermt Use Permit 1505-W 21)308 QQ19 FILm )821N1-A---nO01
Group ] 161/120/The VauLt
161 07/23/1973 1538U Conditional Use Permit 1538-U 20308 QQ19 FILm 3a21N1AOOOl /
Group I 161/12Q/The VauLt
161 021071197/, 1608 Conditional Use Permit 1608 20308 QQ19 FILm 3821NIAQOQ1
Group I 161/12Q/The VauLt
161 03/21/197/, 1615C Conditional Use Permit 1615-C 20308 0019 FiLm 3821NIAQQQ1
Group [ 161/120/The VauLt
161 02/25/1975 1702V Conditional Use Permit 1702-M 20308 0019 FiLm 3821N1AO001
Grc~ ] 1611120/The VauLt
161 Q~/Z3/1976 176~v Conditional Use Permit 1769-U 20308 QQ19 FiLm 3821NIAIXX)l
Group t 161/12Q/The VauLt
161 05/03/1976 1827V Conditional Use Permit 1827-~ 20308 0019 FiLm 3821Nl-'---M01
Group i 161/12Qfrhe VauLt
161 06/11/1976 18&lV Conditional Use Permit 18&1-V 2Q$08 QQ19 FILm 3821NIAQQQ1
Group I 161/1ZO/The VauLt
161 10/2211976 18861J Conditional Use Permit 1886-V 20308 QQ19 FILm 3821N1ADQQ1
Gma ! 161/12Q/The VauLt
161 1212211976 1909V Conditional Use Permit 1909-U 20308 Q019 FILm 38211rlAIXX)l ~
Group I 161/120/The VauLt
161 07/11/1977 196Z1~ Conditional Use Permit 1962-M 20308 0019 FILm 3821NIAO001
Group I 1611120/The VauLt
IUIDESTY...BIt061 City of TiLe Pale
03/07/1~15 Fi tee lie for Oestrdcti~n lh&Os&5
F/''' Eta let. FiLe Rotefface # Store Nedia
i, ' Date liar. Brief liee~riptlen Cede lecurlty CLass Storage LeeaLlen Leestime Reference
161 O7/22/1FTT 1961V Conditional Use Permit 1961-V 20306 0019 Film 3821NIAOG01
Group ! 161/120/The Vmutt
161 12/Q6/1977 1992~ Conditional Use Permit t992-V 20308 0019 FILm 3821NIAiXX)1
stomp I 161/12Q/The VauLt :
161 09/18/1978 2077V Conditional Use Permit ZQ77-U ZQ3Q6 0019 FILm Xa21N1AOQOl
~rCN~ I 161/120/The VauLt
161 09/2511978 2123~ Conditional k Permit 2t25-U 20308 0019 FILm 3821NIAOOO1
Group z 161/12Q/The VauLt
161 03/05/1979 2z3~ Conditional Use Permit 2ZSG-U 20308 0019 FiLm ~INIAOQOl
Group ! 161/12Q/The VauLt
161 05/14/1979 2Z~IU Conditimet Use Permit 22~1-&~ 20~8 0019 FiLm 3821111A000t
Group I 161/12Q/The VauLt
161 05/15/1979 ?~36&~ ConditionaL USe Permit 2Z36-k/ 20308 0019 FiLm 3821N1AQO01
Group Z 161/120/The VauLt
161 07/23/1979 2052 Conditional Use Permit 2052 20306 0019 FiLm 3821WIAO001
~ Gro(4) ! 161/120/The VauLt
~, 08/31/1979 2205~ ConditionaL Use Permit 2205-V 20308 0019 FiLm 3821NIAO001 :
Group Z 161/120/The VauLt
161 11/13/1979 2302V ConditionaL Use Permtt 2302-V 20306 0019 FiLm 3821NIAO001
Group ! 161/120/The VauLt
161 11/13/1979 2303~/Conditional Use Permit 2303-U 20308 QQ19 FiLm 3821N1AIX)QI
Group I 161/12Q/The VauLt
161 o2/27/198o 2325v Conditional Use Permit Z325-W 20308 0019 FiLm 3821N1AOOOl
Group I 161/12Q/The VauLt
161 Q?/1Q/1980 2333W Conditional Use Permit 2333-~ 20308 0019 FiLm 3821N1AOOOl
Oroq~ I 161/12Q/The VauLt
161 o?/1o/198o 23~u Conditional Use Permit Z3~-U 20308 0019 FiLm 3821N1AOOO1
Group x 161/12Q/The VauLt
161 ol/27/1981 2A67~ CQncllttonaL Use Permit 2~67-U 20308 0019 FILm ~821N1A0001
Group I 161/120/The VauLt
161 o2/23/t981 2438u Conditional Use Permit 2438-U 20308 0019 FiLm 3821NtAQOOl
Group: 161/12Q/The VauLt
~ o3/o9/1981 2~3v Conditional Use Permit 24~-U 20308 0019 FILm X21mAOOOl
Group ] 161/12Q/The VauLt
161 10/13/19812513U Conditional Usa Permit 2513-~ 20308 0019 FiLm 3821NtA0001
Srma ] 161/120/The VauLt
RlQES1"t...IIR061 City ef Teamcute hie
03/0//1995 FiLe Reedy for Destruction lh&l):d
Ooc. item Rat. FiLe Reference · Store Ikdl8
Ref. Date Ref. Brief Description Code Security Ctm Store Lmtion Lmtion lift,
161 0~/26/1982 254~ Conditional Use Permit 25/ki 29308 0019 Fits
Group ! 161/120/The VauLt
161 12/20/1982 2613 ConditiomL Use Permit 261) 20)08 0019 FILl 38211rlAOO01
Group ! 161/120rfhe VauLt :
161 03/00/198& 26744/CQrdftionat Use Permit 267&-V 20308 0019 FILl 3821NIAO001
Group ! 161/lZOrrhe vwtt
161 03/13/198~ 26~ Conditional Use Permit 2666 20308 0019 FILl 3821NIAOOOl
Group ! 161/120rrhe VauLt
161 06/25/198& 2718U Conditional U;e Permit ZT18-V 20208 0019 FiLm 3821M1A0001
Group x 161/120/The VauLt
161 QT/)Q/19&G 2723U Conditional Use Permit 2723-U 20308 0019 FiLm ~SZ1NIAO001
Group i 161/120/The VauLt
161 12/06/1985 2835 Conditional Use Permit 2835 20308 0019 FiLm 38~1N1AOOO1
Group ! 161/12Q/The VauLt
........................................................... ,-- ......
161 01/07/1986 2809 Conditional Use Permit 2809 20308 0019 FiLm 3821N1A0001
Group i 161/12Q/The VauLt
161 01/31/1986 28A6 Conditional Use Permit 2866 20306 0019 FILm 3921111AO001
Group I 161/120/The VauLt
161 02/21/1986 28~7 Conditional Use Permit 2867 20308 0019 FiLm 3821NIAOO01
Group ] 161/12Q/The VauLt
161 03/28/1986 2857 Conditional Use Permit 2857 20308 0019 FiLm 3821141A0001
Group I 161/120/The VauLt
161 091Z3/1986 28~9 Ccmditiormt USe Permit 28~9 20308 0019 FiLm 3821N1AQQQ1
GroLq~ i 161/126/The VauLt
161 10127/1986 2016 Conditional Use Permit 2016 20308 0019 FiLm 3821N1AIXX)l
Group I 161/120/The VauLt
161 10/1311987 2708 Conditional Use Permit 2708 20308 0019 FiLl 3821NIAQOQ1
Group I 161/120/The VauLt
161 08/16/1988 3000 Conditional Use Permit 3000 20308 0019 FILm 38211rlAO001
Group i 161/120/The Vautt
161 11/30/1988 2935 Conditional Use Permit 2935 20308 0019 FiLm )SZINIAQOQ1
Group ] 161/120/The VauLt
161 o3/16/1989 3036 Conditional Use Permit 3036 203(0 0019 FiLm )8~INIAIX)QI ~
Group ! 161/120/The VauLt
161 06/07/1989 3003 Conditional Use Permit 3QQ3 20)08 0019 FiLm 3821N1A0001
Sroup Z 161/120/The VauLt
RItDESTY...ItR061 City ef TiLe Page 5
0S/07/1~J5 FILe Reedy fer DastrJctlen
~ Item Bet. FiLe leference · Store Nedl8
b : Date Ref. Brief Descriptfen Code Security Ctm Storage Letlee LocaLlee Reference
161 08/07/1; )062 CoMttiormL Use Pemtt ~062 20308 0019 FILB 3821NIAIX)01
Grm4; Z 161/120/The VauLt
161 00/01/1999 ~ Conditional time Pemtt )Q~6 20308 Q019 FiLe 3821NIA(XX)l
Group i 161/120/The VauLt "
161 09/06/1989 2901 CoMitionaL Use Permit 2901 20~ 0019 FiLm 3821N1A0001
Gro~ ! 161/12Q/The VauLt
161 10/06/1989 2980 Conditional Use Pemtt 2980 20308 0019 Firm ~821NtAQO01
Group ! 161/12Q/The VauLt
161 12/18/1989 3076 CoMitionaL Use Pemit 3076 20308 0019 FiLe
Sro;; 161/120/The vault
77 Records
IUIDESTY...RRQ61 City of TabLe Doc. Rot ......... 161 Pete 1
o3/o7/1995 FiLm Iteedy fer iitrmtlen. letentice Code... 2030/ 11s38:42
lastructkn Date. 03/01/1995
Doc. Item let. FiLe Reference · Storage Mie ~
Rot, Date Ref, Briof Description" Code Security CLass Store Lecatton Location bf~ ,,
161 06/22/1; 1067 CcmditionmL Use Permit 1067 20307 0019 FiLm 3821141AOO61-
Group I 161/120/The VauLt
161 (X/11/199Q I TQUP I 203Q? QQI? FiLm 3821NIAQOQ1
Group i 161/12Q/The VauLt :
t61 06/1&/1990 2 TQUP 2 ZQ3Q? QQ17 Fitm 38ZtNl-'--n~--1
GPaup X 161/lZO/The VauLt
161 07/z3/1990 3 TOUP 3 203Q? QQI? Fi Lm 38ZlmAOOOl
Group ! 161/1ZO/Th, VauLt
161 Qe/O3/199Q & TQUP & Z(X~Q? QQ1? Fi Lm 3821NIA(XX)1
Group ! 161/12Q/The VauLt
161 10/0~/1990 s TOUP 5 20307 0017 FiLm 3aZlN1AOOOl
Group Z 161/lZO/Th, VauLt
161 10/~/1990 6 TOUP 6 20307 0017 Fi Lm 38ZtN1AOOOl
Group I 161/120/The VauLt
161 1Q/Oe/199Q ? TQUP ? Z03Q? QQI? FiLm 38ZIN1AOO01
Grcx4) ! 161/1ZO/The VauLt
161 10/11/1990 9 TOUP 9 20307 0017 FiLm 3821N1AOQQ1
Group t t61/12Q/The VauLt
161 10/18/1990 8 TOUP 8 ZO3O? 0017 FiLm 38ZlN1AOQOl
Gro~ Z 161/1ZQ/The VauLt
161 10/27/1990 11 TQUP 11 2030? QQI? FiLm 38ZlNl-'---ng01
Groqo I 161/lZO/The VauLt
161 11/08/1990 12 TQUP lZ ZQ3Q? QQI? FiLm 3821N1AQQQ1
Group [ 161/120/The VauLt
161 11/11/1990 10 TQUP 10 20307 0017 FiLm 3821NIAO001
6rOL; ] 161/120/The VauLt
161 11/14/1990 1) TOUP 1) 20307 0017 FiLm 3821N1AOOQI
Grow [ 161/120/The VauLt .
161 11/14/1990 14 TOUP 16 20307 0017 Fi Lm )821111A0001
Group ! 161/120/The VauLt
161 11/26/1990 15 TOUP 15 20307 0017 FiLm 3821NIAOQ01
Group ! 161/120/The VauLt
161 11/27/1990 16 TOUP 16 20307 0017 FiLm 3821N1AO001
Group ! 161/120/The VauLt
161 11/30/1990 11 TQUP 11 20)01 0011 FiLm 3821NIAOO01
6reup i 161/120/The VauLt
RleESTY...RR061 City of Teemcute Page 2
03/07/1995 FiLe Reedy for ketrwtion
Do/''-` item Rat. FiLe Reference · Store Neelie
RS / Date let. Brief Description Code Security Ctm Storage Location Location Reference
161 01/31/1991 18 TOUP 18 20307 0017 FILm 3821N1AQO01
Group i 161/120/The VauLt
161 01/3111g91 19 TOUP 19 20307 0017 F t ks 3821H1AO001
Group ! 161/120frhe VauLt "
161 02/0t/1~91 20 TOUP 20 20307 0017 Fiim 3821N1AOOOl
Group I 161/120/The VauLt
161 0Z/15/1991 21 TOUP 21 20307 0017 Fitm 3821N1AO001
Group ! 161/120/The VauLt
22 Records Processed
mtDESTY...RRQ61 City ef TeecaLm Doc. Ref ......... 161 Pale 1
03/0711995 FILes lidlr for Imtructten Retention C~d,... ZOS12 lh4&:18
Destruction Date. 03/01/199S
Doc. Iron let. FILe Reference # =toraee Redla
Itef. Date Ref. Brief Description Cede Security CLass Itorage Location Location left /
161 Q~/1011981 1223 Lot Line Adjustment 1223 20312 Q018 Ft tm 3821141AIX)Ql'
Group Z 161/120/The VauLt
161 Q~/15/1981 1238 Lot Line Adjustment 1238 29312 (X)18 FILE 3821N1AOQQ1
QPM ! 161/12Q/The VauLt "
161 0511511981 1256 Lot Line Adjustment 1256 20312 0018 FitE
GrOup I 1611120/The Vault
161 05/18/1981 1253 Lot Line Adjustment 1253 20312 0018 FILE 3821N1AOQ01
Group ! 161/120/The Vault
161 06/16/1981 1215 Lot Line Adjustment 1215 20312 0518 FiLE 5821NIAO001
Group I 16111ZQ/The VauLt
161 07/13/1981 1295 Lot Line Adjustment 1295 20312 0018 FiLE 3821N1AOOOl
Group I 16!/12Q/The VauLt
161 07/17/1981 1299 Lot Line Adjustment 1299 20312 Q018 FiLm
Group [ 161/120/The vault
161 08/19/1981 1317 Lot Line Adjustment 1317 20312 0018 FiLm 3821N1AOQOl
Group I 161/12Q/The Vault
161 08/27/1981 lS22 Lot Line AdjusUaent 1)22 20~12 0018 FiLE ~21NIAO001
r-r~up ! 161/120/The Vautt
161 10113/1981 1)~0 Lot Line Adjustment 1360 28312 0018 FiLE )821NIAO001
Grcx4~ [ 161/120rrhe VauLt
161 11/30/1981 1)62 Lot Line Adjustmat 1)62 20312 0018 FiLE 3821141A0001
Group i 161/120/The VauLt
161 12/29/1981 1)88 Lot Line Adjustment 1388 28312 0016 FiLE 3821N1AOO01
Group I 161/120rrhe VauLt
161 07121/1982 1507 Lot Line Adjustment 1507 20312 0018 FiLE 3821NIAO001
Group i 1611120/The VauLt
161 10/15/1982 15~kB Lot Line Adjustment 15~8 20312 0018 Ft LE 3821N1-A-O00--1
Group I 1611120/The Vault
161 12/13/1982 1586 Lot Line Adjustment 1586 20312 0018 File 5821NIAO001
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 12/13/1982 1587 Lot Line Adjustment 1587 20312 0018 File 3821N1AO001
Group ] 161/120/The Vault
161 12/17/1987. 1590 Lot Line Adjustment 1590 20312 0018 File )821N1A-nO0--1
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 03/15/1983 16&8 Lot Line Adjustment 16&8 20~12 0018 File 3821N1AO001
Gro~ i 161/120/The Vault
ILeEITY...NI061 City of Teemcute Peee 2
0310TI1995 FILe Reedy for Oestructlen 11:&&:18
D/~ item let. FILe Reform # Itorege ila
I~ ,~ Date lof. Brief I)acrtptlen Cede lecurity Ctau Itm Leestim Leutlen Ioference
161 07/01/1983 1716 Lot Line Adjustment 1716 20312 0018 FItm 3821NIAO4)01
Group i 161/120/The Vault
161 02/22/198& 1858 Lot Line Adjustment 1858 20312 0018 Film 3821N1AO001
Gro~F i 161/120/The Vault :
161 02/22/198& 1859 Lot Line Adjustrant 1859 20512 0018 Film 3821111A0001
Groq; ] 161/120/The Vault
.............................................................. . ....
161 02/28/198~ 1865 Lot Line Adjuslxent 1865 20312 0018 FILe 3821HI-A---nO01
Group i 161/120/The Vault
161 03/05/198& 18&7 Lot Line Adjusment 18&7 20~12 0018 File )821N1AO001
Group i 161/120/The Vault
161 03/)0/198& 1900 Lot Line Adjustmat 1900 20512 0018 File 3821N1AO001
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 0~/26/198~ 1906 Lot Line Adjustment 1906 20512 0018 File 3821N1~--n~-I
Group ! 161/120/The Vault
........................................................... -. ......
161 0~/26/198& 1907 Lot Line Adjustment 1907 20312 0018 File 3821NIAO001
~__ Group I 161/120/The Vault
j ..............................................................
lt, J6/Ot,/198~ 1973 Lot Line Adjustment 1923 20312 0018 File 3821NIA(XX)1 :
Group i 161/120/The Vault
161 06/22/198& 191) Lot Line Adjustment 1913 20312 0018 Film 3821NIAO001
Group i 161/120/The Vault
161 06/29/19&~ 19)8 Lot Line Adjustment 19)8 20312 0018 Film 3821N1AO001
Group I 161/12OfFhe Vault
161 07/03/198~ 2339 Lot Line Adjustment 2339 20~12 0018 Film 3821NIAO001
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 08/24/19~ 2006 Lot Line Adjustment 2006 20312 0018 File 3821NIAO001
Groq~ I 161/120/The Vault
161 10/19/198~ 200~ Lot Line Adjustment 200~ 20312 0018 Film 3821N1-s---m~-I
GrokF i 161/120frhe Vault :
161 12/06/198~ 2035 Lot Line Adjustment 20)5 20512 0018 Film 3821N1-s---N~-1
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 03/03/1985 2075 Lot Line Adjustment 2075 20~12 0018 File 3821NIAO001
Group ! 161/120/The Vault
16~---03/15/1985 216t, Lot Line Adjustment 216& 20~12 0018 Film 3821Nl~__n~_1
Group ] 161/120/The Vault
161 0~/26/1985 2115 Lot Line Adjustment 2115 20312 0018 Film 3821NIAO001
Grc~ ! 161/120frhe Vault
RROESTY,,,RRQ61 City of TamecaLm Page
Q3/QT/1995 FiLes Ready ~or Desink'tim 11:4&:18
Doc. Item Ret. FILe Reference · Storage Ikdle
let. Date lot. Brief lascriptten Code Security CLan Storage Leestim LeesLien let&
161 08/13/1985 2190 Lot Line Adjustment 2190 20~12 0018 FILE 3821N1AOO94
Grc&e I 161/120/The VauLt
161 09/1)/1985 2197 Lot Line Adjustment 2197 2(512 0018 FiLm 3821NIAOIW1
Group i 161/120/The VauLt :
161 09/16/1985 2198 Lot Line Adjustmet 2198 20512 0018 Fi LE 3821Nl~--n~-1
Grc~ ! 161/120/The VauLt
161 09/26/1985 2203 Lot Line Adjustment 2203 20312 0018 FILm )a21N1AOOO1
Group i 161/lZO/The VauLt
161 10/25/1985 _~?73 Lot Line Adjustment ~ 20312 Q018 FiLm 3821NIAOOO1
Group I 161/120rrhe VauLt
161 11/25/1985 2235 Lot Line Adjustment 2235 20312 0018 FiLm 3821N1AO001
Gro~ i 161/12Q/The VauLt
161 11/26/1985 22A6 Lot Line Adjustment 2246 20312 0018 FILm 3821NIA(XX)I
Group Z 161/120/The VauLt
161 01/21/1986 2266 Lot Line Adjustment 2266 20312 0018 FiLm 3821N1AOOOl
Group z 161/126/The VauLt
161 02/03/1986 2286 Lot Line Adjustment 2286 20312 QQ18 FILm 3821N1AOOO1
Group I 161112Q/The VauLt
................................................................
161 02/07/1986 2281 Lot Line Adjustment 2281 20312 QQ18 FiLm SaZ1N1AOOOl
Group I 161/12Q/The VauLt
161 02/07/1986 2287 Lot Line Adjustment 2287 20312 0018 FiLm )821NIAQOQ1
SPooF ! 161/l~O/The VauLt
161 03/26/1986 Z307 Lot Line Adjustment 2507 20312 Q018 FILm 3821NIAOOOl
Group i 161/12Q/The VauLt
161 03/26/1986 23~ Lot Line Adjuslaaent Z3~ 20312 Q018 FiLm 3821N1A~1
Gro~ i 161/126/The VauLt
161 (~/~/1986 2317 Lot Line Adjustment 2317 20312 QQ18 FILm 3a21N1AOOO1
Group I 161/12Q/The VauLt
161 07/12/1986 2394 Lot Line AdjustElnt 239& 20312 QQ18 FILE 3821NIAOOO1
Qr~m x 161/IZO/The VauLt
161 08/14/1986 2392 Lot Line Adjustment 2392 203t2 QQ18 FiLm SaZlNl~--m~-1
Group Z 161/126/The VauLt
161 1Q/22/1986 2405 Lot Line Adjustment 2405 20312 QQ18 FILm 3821N1AQQQ1 .~"~
Group t 161/126/The VauLt
161 11/13/1986 2~12 Lot Line Adjustmet 2~12 20312 QQ18 FILm Sa~IN1AOOOl
Group I 161/126/The VauLt
ILeESTY,,,RB061 City of TiLe Page
03/07/1995 FILes Reedy for Instructlea 11:66:18
~ Tim Bet. FiLe Reference dl Storage INdia
k / Bate Ref, Brief Description Cede kcurity Ctau Storage Location L~cmtion Iofm
161 11/21/1986 2626 Lot Line Adjustment 2626 20312 0018 FILE 38;1NIA0001
Group ! 161/120/The VauLt
161 11/21/1996 2627 Lot Line Adjustment 2627 20312 0018 FILE 3821N1A0001
Group I 161/120/The VauLt
161 11/21/1986 2628 Lot Line Adjustment 2628 20312 0018 FILE 3821KtAO001
Group ! 161/120/The VauLt
161 11/21/1986 2629 Lot Line Adjustment 2629 20312 0018 FiLE 3821N1A0001
_. Group ! 161/120/The VauLt
161 12/02/1986 2625 Lot Line Adjustment 2625 20312 0018 FILE 3821N1A0001
Grm4~ ! 161/120/The VauLt
161 12/16/1986 26)7 Lot Line Adjustment 2637 20~12 0016 FILE 3821141A0001
Gre; Z 161/120/The VauLt
161 01/16/1987 2656 Lot Line Adjustment 2456 20)12 0018 FiLE 3821111A0001
Group [ 161/120/The VauLt
161 06/17/1987 2501 Lot Line Adjustment 2501 20312 0018 FILE 3821111A0001
~. Group ! 161/120/The VauLt
't, 05/02/1987 2518 Lot Line Adjustment 2518 20312 0018 FiLE 3821N1A0001
GrOLq~ ! 161/120/The VauLt
161 07/16/1987 25~z, Lot Line Adjustment ~ 20)12 0018 FiLE 3821NIA0001
Group ] 161/120/The VauLt
161 07/16/1987 2565 Lot Line Adjustment 2565 20312 0018 FiLE )821N1A0001
Group ) 161/120/The VauLt
161 07/16/1987 2550 Lot Line Adjustment 2550 20312 0018 FiLE )821N1AOQ01
Group t 161/120/The VauLt
161 07/16/1987 2551 Lot Line Adjustment 2551 20312 0018 FiLE 3821111A0001
Gro~ ! 161/120/The VauLt
161 07/16/1987 2552 Lot Line Adjustment 2552 20312 0018 FiLE )821NIA0001
Group ] 161/1Z0/The VauLt
161 98/07/1987 2559 Lot Line Adjuster 2559 20312 0018 FiLE 3821N1A0001
Group t 161/120/The VauLt
161 08/19/1987 2785 Lot Line Adjustment 2785 20)12 0018 FiLE 3821N1A0001
Group ! 161/120/The VauLt
1/,'--- 09/03/1987 2577 Lot Line Adjustment 2577 20312 0018 FiLE 3821NIL--M01
Group ! 161/t~O/The VauLt
161 10/08/1987 2598 Lot Line Adjustment 2598 20312 0016 FILE 3821N1A0001
Group i 161/120/The VauLt
IUIDES~...IIR061 City of TeemaLe Pale 5
15/03'/1995 Fitera lead~ fer Mtrtmtlen 11:&&818
Doc. Item Bet. FiLe Reference · Store Mii ~
Rof. IMte lef. Brief I)ee~riptim r~xi security ctau Itoraee Loutlee Location left /
161 10/20/1~87 2595 Lot Line Adjustrant 2595 20~12 0018 Fitl 3821111A0001
Group ! 161/120/The VauLt
161 11/06/1987 2607 Lot Line Adjemtxent 2607 20~12 0018 FILE 3821Nl10001
G~oup i 161/12Q/The VauLt :
161 11/13/1987 2612 Lot Line Adjustment 2612 20312 0018 FILm ~821N1-a---n~-1
Groq~ ! 161/126/The VauLt
161 12/01/1987 2618 Lot Line Adjustment 2618 20312 0018 FiLm 3821N1AO001
Grm~ i 161/12Q/The VauLt
161 12/0~/1987 2620 Lot Line Adjustment 2620 2Q312 0018 FILm 3821NIAQ001
6ro~ Z 161/120/The VauLt
161 12/09/1987 2613 Lot Line AdjmtEmnt 2613 20312 0018 FiLm · 3821NIA0001
Groulo I 161/120/The VauLt
161 12/10/1987 2625 Lot Line Adjusment 2625 20312 0018 FILm ~8211tlA0001
Group I 161/120/The VauLt
161 01/28/1988 2656 Lot Line Adjustment 2656 20~12 0018 FILE ~821N1AO001
Group I 161/12Q/The VauLt ~-~
161 02/01/1988 2660 Lot Line Adjusment 2660 20~12 0018 FtLm 3821N1AO001
Group [ 161/120/The VauLt
161 02/17/1988 2668 Lot Line Adjuslaent 2668 20~12 0018 FILm ~821N1AO001
Groq~ i 161/120/The VauLt
161 03/25/1988 2686 Lot Line Adjuslaent 2686 21512 0018 FtLm 3821NIAO001
Group I 161/120/The VauLt
161 0~/12/1988 2700 Lot Line Adjuslaent 2700 20~12 0018 FILm ~821N1AO001
Group I 161/12Q/The VauLt
161 0~/13/1988 2692 Lot Line Adjustment 2692 28~12 0018 FILE ~21N1AO001
Group i 161/12Q/The VauLt
161 (X/27/1988 2701 Lot Line Adjustment 2701 21512 0018 FILm 3821N1A---n~-1
Group I 161/120/The VauLt
161 0~/Z8/1988 26?/, Lot Line Adjustment 26?/, 20312 0018 FiLm 3821N1AOOOl
Group I 1611126frhe VauLt
161 05/19/1988 2717 Lot Line Adjustment 2717 Z151Z 0018 FiLm 3821N1AOOOl
G~4o ] 161/120/The VauLt
161 06/30/1988 27/,2 Lot Line Adjustment 27/,2 20312 0018 Fttm 3821N1A0001 ~
Group ! 161/120/The VauLt
161 07/07/1988 27/,5 Lot Line Adjusment 27/,5 20312 0018 FILm 3821NIA0001
Group ] 161/120/The VauLt
IRDESTY,,,RR061 City of Tamecute Page 6
0]/0111995 Filem Itemd~ for eemtructlen 11:44:18
~ item let, File Reference I Store Nedl8
R, J Date liar. Brief Oeecriptien Cede Security CLass Itorage Leestim Lacelien Reference
161 01/2811988 2/50 Lot LIne Adjustment 2750 20312 0018 Film 3821N1AIXIOl
Group I 161/120rrhe Vault
161 08/0]/1988 2162 Lot LIne Adjustment 2762 20312 0018 Film 3821N1.a.-nO0__l
Group i t61/120rfhe Vault "
161 08/10/1988 2/86 Lot Line Adjustment 2786 20312 0018 Film 3821NIAO001
Group I 161/120rrhe Vault
161 08/11/1988 2790 Lot Line Adjustment 2790 20)12 0018 Film 3821111A0001
Group [ 161/120/The Vault
161 09/06/1988 2719 Lot Line Adjustment 2719 20312 0818 FtLm 3821N1AOOOl
Gro~ I 161/120/The Vault
161 09/27/1988 ~ Lot Line Adjustment 2823 20312 0018 FILm 3821HI-A---nO01
Group I 161/12Q/The Vault
161 09/27/1988 2831 Lot Line Adjustment 2631 20312 Q018 FILm 3821NIAOOO1
Group I 161/12Q/The Vault
161 10/28/1988 28~1 Lot Line Adjustment 28~1 20112 0018 Film ~821N1AO001
.~ Gro~ I 161/120/1'he VauLt
1~ 10/31/1988 2851 Lot Line Adjustment 2851 20312 0018 Film 3821N1N)001 '-
Group ! 161/120rrhe vault
161 12/13/1988 2883 Lot Line Adjustment 2883 20112 0018 Film 3821N1A0001
Grotq~ ! 161/120//he Vault
161 12/23/1~88 288~ Lot Line Adjustment 288/, 20112 0018 Ftle 3821N1A0001
Group ! 161/120/The Vault
161 12/23/1988 2886 Lot Line Adjustment 2886 20312 0018 Film 3821NtA0001
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 01/0~/1;8~ 28~5 Lot Line Adjustment 285 20312 0018 Film
Group ] 161/120rrhe Vault
161 01111/1989 2905 Lot Line Adjustment 2905 20312 Q018 FILm 3821Rt.a--nO0__1
Group I 161/12Q/The Vault
161 Q2/0]/1989 2906 Lot Line Adjustment 2906 20312 Q018 FILm 3821N1AOQOl
Group z 1611120rrhe vault
161 02/17/1989 2996 Lot Line Adjustment 2996 20312 QQ18 Film 3821NIAOOO1
Group Z 161/120/The Vault
16~--05/04/1989 3016 Lot LIne Adjustaunt 3016 20312 QQ18 Film 3821N1AOOOl
Group ! 161/120/The Vault
161 05/18/1989 3028 Lot Line Adjuslamnt 3028 20312 0018 FILm 3821Nt',_n~O__l
Group I 161/120rr~ Vault
RROESTY...RIt061 City of TEecalm Page 7
03/I)711999 FILe Reedy far Imtructlen lh44818
Doc. Item Rat. File Reference # Storage leedie
Ref. Date Re/. Brief hecrlptim Cede lecurity CLue Starage Lacetime Leestime lofk /
161 0~/0~/198~ 3038 Lot Line Adjatment )038 20~¶2 0018 FILl 3821NIAO001
Group ! 161/120/Teh Vault
161 0?/07/1089 3065 Lot Line Adjustment 3065 26312 Q018 FILl 3821NIAOOO1
SEx; Z 161/120/Th, Vault "
161 07/10/1989 3061 Lot Line Adjustment 3061 20312 QQ18 FILe 3821N1AiXX)l
Group ! 161/120/The Vault
161 09/21/1989 )1IX Lot Line Adjustment 3104 20312 0018 Fitl 3821N1AO001
Groq; ! 161/120frhe Vault
161 10/20/1989 3039 Lot Line Adjustment 3039 20512 0018 FILl 3821NIAOQQI
Group i 1611120/The Vault
161 1012511989 3129 Lot Line Adjustment 3¶29 20312 0018 Fitl 3821N1AIX)01
Group I 1611120/The Vault
161 10/31/1989 3128 Lot Line Adjustment 3128 20312 0018 FILl 3821N1AOQ01
Group i 161/12Q/The Vault
161 11/14/1989 3169 Lot Line Adjustment 3169 20312 0018 FILl 3821111A0001
Groq~ I 161/120/The Vault
161 11/22/1989 30~0 Lot Line Adjustment 3{XO 20312 0018 Fill ~821N1AO001
Group i 161/120/The Vault
161 11/22/1989 3151 Lot Line Adjustment 3151 20312 0018 FILl 38211llAQ001
Group Z 161/12Q/The Vault
161 12/07/1989 3170 Lot Line Adjustmet 3170 20312 0018 FILI 3E1N1AO001
Group ] 161/12Q/The Vault
161 12/13/1989 3171 Lot Line Adjustment 3171 20312 0018 Film 3821N1AOOO1
Group I 161/120frhe Vault
161 12/1811989 31~ Lot Line Adjustment 31/~ 20312 0018 FiLe 38~lNIAOO01
Groq= I 161/1ZO/The Vault
161 12/1911989 3252 Lot Line Adjustment 3252 20312 0018 FILl 3821rlAOQQ1
Group i 161/120/The Vault
161 12/19/1989 3253 Lot Line Adjustment 3253 20312 0018 Fi Lm
Greup Z 161/120/The Vault
161 12/29/1989 3108 Lot Line Adjustment 3108 20312 0018 FILl 3821N1AOQ01
Grm4} I 1611120/The Vault
161 01/18/1990 3188 Lot Line Adjustment 3188 20312 0018 FILl 3821Nl-s---ndXq-
Group I 1611120frhe Vault
161 03/0311990 3199 Lot Line Adjustment 3195 2g)12 0018 FILl 3821N1ROOOl
Group i 1611120/The Vault
UDESTY..,Im061 City ef TiLe Pile 8
15/0T/1995 FiLe Reedy fer eastreich 11:&&:18
D/~ ]tee let. FiLe Reference it Store lledle
It / Date let. Brief Description C~b kcurity CLass Storage Location LEtion leference
161 03/13/199Q 32&0 Lot Line Adjustment 32&Q 29312 Q018 FiLm 3821N1JIQQ1
Group Z 161/120/Th, VauLt
161 0~/02/1990 1 Lot Line Adjustment 1 20312 0018 FiLm )821N1AQOOl
Group Z 161/120/The VauLt
161 07/18/1990 3 Lot Line Adjustment 3 20312 0018 FiLm 3821NIAOO01
Grme ! 161/120/The VauLt
161 08/14/1990 2 Lot Line AdJusment 2 Z0312 0018 FiLm 3821N1AO001
Group ! 161/120/The VauLt
161 08/17/1990 8 Lot Line AdJament 8 20312 0018 FILm 3821N1AOO01
G~o~ ] 161/120/The VauLt
t61 08/23/1990 7 Lot LZne AdjustREnt 7 20312 0018 FiLm 38~1NIAO001
Group I 161/120/The VauLt
161 10/02/1990 5 Lot Line Adjustment 5 20312 0018 FiLm 3821N1A(X)01
Group ! 161/120/The VauLt
161 10/12/1990 10 Lot Line Adjustamnt 10 20312 0018 FiLm
/~- Group [ 161/120/The VauLt
~l . ...................................................... : ......
1~ |0/31/1990 9 Lot Line Adjustment 9 20312 0018 FiLm 3821NIAO001
Group ! 161/120/The VauLt
161 11/29/1990 1~ Lot Line Adjusment 1) 20312 0018 FiLm ~821NIAO001
Group [ 161/120/The VauLt
161 12/18/1990 4 Lot Line Adjustment 4 20312 0018 FiLm 3821NIAO001
Group ! 161/120/The VauLt
137 Records Processed
RROESTY...IIRO61 City ef TeamcaLm Doc. net ......... 161 Paee
03/07/1995 Fitera Reedy for eeetructlem latention Code... ZOSa6 118~rf:SS
Destruction Date..0~/I)1/1995
Doc. Item let. FiLe Reference # Storage Mia
Ref. Date Bet. Brief I)eecriptlen Code Security CLIo8 Storage Location Location Raft
161 01/19/1988 10376 PLot PLan 103/6 2032& Q012 FILm 3821NIAQO61'
Group X 161/120/The FILm
161 06/08/1988 10379 PLot PLan 10579 2032& 0017 film 3821NIAOOOl
Group I 161112Q/The VauLt
161 Q?/26/1989 11650 PLot PLan 116S0 20324 0912 FILm
Group Z 161/1ZO/The VauLt
161 08/09/1989 0325 PLot PLan Z0326 (XX)6 FiLm 3821N1AOOO1
_. Group X 161/120rrhe VauLt
161 08/10/1989 11436 PLot PLan 11436 20326 0312 FiLm 3aZlN1AOOOl
Group t 161/1zorrhe vault
161 08/16/1989 115~1 PLot PLan 11561 Z0324 QOlZ FILm 3821N1AOOOl
Group ! 161/120/The VauLt
161 08/16/1; 11629 PLot PLan 11629 20324 0012 FiLm 3821N1AO001
Group I 161/120/The VauLt
............................................. ~ ............. ~ ......
161 08/16/1; 11637 PLot PLan 11637 20326 0012 FiLm 3821141A0001
Group t 161/120/The VauLt
161 08/16/1989 11661 PLot PLan 11661 20324 0012 FiLm 3821WIAO001 '
Group ! 161/120/The VauLt
161 08/21/1989 116)9 PLot PLan 11639 20326 0012 FiLm 38ZIN1AO001
Group t 161/120/The VauLt
161 08/2)/1; 11/~2 PLot PLan 114~2 20326 0012 FiLm 3821N1AO001
Group I 161/120/The VauLt
161 08/25/1989 11/.47 PLot PLan 11/,47 20326 0012 FiLm 3821Nl-a---nO0-1
Group ! 161/120/The VauLt
161 08/25/1989 11/.49 PLot PLan 11/.49 20324 O01Z FiLm 3821NIAOO01
Group Z 161/120rrhe vault
161 08/z5/1989 11456 PLot PLan 11656 20326 0012 FiLm 3821NIAO001
Group Z 161/120/The VauLt ·
161 09/01/1989 11665 PLot PLan 11665 20324 Q012 FiLm 3821N1AX)QOl
Group t 161/lzOrrhe vault
161 09/05/1989 11502 PLot PLan 11502 Z0324 Q012 FILm 3821N1AQQQ1
Group ! 161/12Q/The VauLt
161 09/12/1989 11677 PLot PLan 11677 20326 0012 FiLm 3821NIAO001
Group ] 161/120rrhe VauLt
161 09/12/1989 9926 PLot PLan 9926 2032& 0012 FiLe 3821N1AO001
Group ! 161112Q/The VauLt
RRDESTY...RR061 City of TemecuLo Page
03/07/1995 FiLm Ready for Destruction lh27:53
~ item Rot. FiLe Reference II Store Nedi8
R, Date Ref. Brief Description Cede Security CLass Storage Location Location leference
161 09/18/1; 11566 PLot PLan 115&6 20326 0012 FiLm 3821NIAO001
Group I 161/120/The VauLt
161 09/19/1989 11499 PLot PLan 11499 20326 0012 FILm 3821N1NXX)l
Group z 161/12Q/The Vault
161 09/20/1989 11495 PLot PLan 11&95 2032& 0012 Film 3821NIA0001
Groke I 161/120/The VauLt
161 09/20/1989 11511 PLot PLan 11511 20324 Q01Z FILm 3aaIN1AOOOl
Gr~ t 161/1;O/The Vault
161 09/20/1989 11513 PLot PLan 11513 ;0326 Q012 Film ~821N1AOOOl
. Group Z 161/120/The Vault
161 09/25/1989 11562 PLot PLan 11562 20326 Q012 Film ~a21N1AOOOl
Group Z 161/120/The Vault
161 09/26/1989 11505 PLot PLan 11505 20326 Q012 Film
Group z 161/12Q/The Vault
........................................................... -~ ......
161 09/26/1989 11522 PLot PLan 11522 20324 0012 Film 3821N1.L_n~_1
Group ! 161/120/The Vault
~ .
1~ 09/27/1989 11514 PLot PLan 11514 20326 Q012 Film 3821NIAQ(X)l :
Group i 161/120/the Vault
161 09/27/1989 11526 PLot PLan 115~6 20324 Q012 Film 3821N1AiX)Q1
Group i 161/120/The Vault
161 09/27/1989 11527 PLot PLmn 11527 20324 Q012 Film 3a~INIAOOOl
Group i 161/12Q/The Vault
161 09/28/1989 11531 PLot PLan 11531 20326 Q012 FILm 3821NIAOO01
Group I 161/l~O/The VeuLt
161 09/;9/1909 11551 PLot PLan 11567 20326 0012 Film 3821Nl-A---n~-1
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 10/01/1989 11518 PLot PLan 11518 20326 Q012 Film ~821H1AOQ01
Group Z 161/12Q/The Vault
161 10/02/1989 115~ PLot PLan 11544 20~24 0012 Film 3821NIA0001
Group i 161/120/The Vault
161 10/06/1989 11545 PLot PLan 11555 20326 Q012 Film 3821NIAQ001
Group I 161/120/The Vault
1~--~,10/06/1989 11520 PLot PLan 11520 20326 0012 FiLm 3821NIAO001
Group ! 161/120/The VauLt
161 10/10/1989 11542 PLot PLan 11552 2032A 0012 Film 3821NIA0001
Group ! 161/120/The Vault
WQESTY...RIt061 City of TmecuL8 Page
05/07/1995 FILem lady far 9eftructlen lh27:53
Doc. Item Bet. FiLe Reference # 8forage Nedis
Bet. Dote Bet. Brief Description Cede Security GLees Itorage Location Lention late,
161 10/10/1989 919& Not Nan 919/, 203~ QQ(X FIre 3821NIN)Q01
Group i 161/120/The V~Jtt
161 1011311989 115~6 PLot PLan 11536 2Q32& 0012 FILe 3821N1AOQ01
Group I 1611120/The Veutt "
161 t0113/1989 11538 PLot PLan 11538 2(3326 Q012 Film 3821N1~n99-1
QPoup ! 161/12Q/The VmJLt
161 10/16/1989 11556 PLot PLan 11556 ~32& 0012 Film 3821NIAO001
Group I 161/1ZO/The Vault
161 10116/1989 11557 PLot PLan 11557 20326 Q012 FILm 3821N1AQQQ1
Group i 161112Q/The Vault
161 10118/1989 115~8 PLot PLan 11548 Z0326 QQIZ FILm · 3821N1AQ(X)1
Group I 161/1Z0/The Vault
161 1011811989 11593 PLot PLan 11593 20326 0012 File 3821N1A0(01
Sro~ T 16111ZQ/The Vmutt
161 10/18/1989 11635 PLot PLan 11635 zo326 QQIZ Film 38Z1N1-A-~-n991~
Group z 161/120/The Vault
161 10125/1989 1157~ PLot PLan 11572 2032& 0012 FILm 3821NIAQO01
GPoup I 161/1ZO/The Vault
161 1012611; 11566 PLot Plan 11566 ZQ3Z& (X)IZ FILm 3821NIAQ001
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 10130/1989 11571 PLot PLan 11571 ZQ32& Q012 FILm 3821N1A0001
Group I 161/lZO/The Vault
161 10/3111989 11608 PLot PLan 11608 20526 Q012 FILm 3821NIAOOO1
Group I 1611120/The Vault
161 11/01/1989 116~ PLot PLan 1160& 2Q32& 0012 Film ~821NIAO001
Group I 1611120/The Vault
161 1110711989 11610 PLot PLan 11610 2032& Q012 FILm 3821N1AQQQ1
sroup ! 161/1ZO/th, Vault
161 1110111989 11611 PLot PLan 11611 Z0326 0012 FILm 3821NIAOOOl
Group I 161/lZO/Th, Vmutt
161 11107/1989 11624 PLot PLan 11624 Z0326 0012 FILm 38ZlN1AOQO1
GPoup z 161/lZO/th, Veutt
161 11/09/1989 116O7 PLot PLan 11607 Z0326 Q012 FILm 38ZlN1AOOO1 --"~
Group ! 161/lZO/Th, Vault
161 11/15/1989 116Z0 PLot Plan 11620 Z0326 Q012 FILm 38211rlAQ001
~oup t 161/1ZO/Th, Vault
RiIDESTY...RR061 City of TemscuLe Peee A
03/07/1995 Files Reedy for Destruction 11:27:53
De/''_` Its Rat. File Reform II Storage 14edia
Re ,, Date Ref. Brief Description Code Security CLass Storage Location LEtion Reference
161 11/20/1989 11609 Plot PLan 11609 2032& 0012 FILm 3821NIA0001
-, Grotel 161/120/The Vault
161 11/21/1989 11622 Plot PLan 11622 2032& 0012 Film 3821NIA0001
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 11/29/1989 1164~ PLot PLan 116&& ZOO2& 0012 Ftim 38Z1111AIX)01
Group ! 161/120/The Vault
161 11/30/1989 116~2 PLot PLan 11e42 20~26 0012 Film 3821N1A0001
Grote I 161/120/The Vault
161 11/30/1989 1165& PLot PLan 11654 20326 0012 Film 3821NIA0001
Group i 161/120/The Vault
161 11/30/1989 1168~ PLot PLan 1168& 20)26 0012 Film )821111A0001
Group i 161/120/the Vault
161 12/01/1989 11710 PLot PLan 11710 2G$26 001) film 3821N1AO001
G~oup I 161/120rrhe Vault
161 12/05/1989 5702 PLot PLan 5702 20326 0011 File )821NIA0001
./__ Group ! 161/120/The Vault
16. .2/08/1; 11665 PLot PLan 11665 2032& 0012 Film )821N1AOG01
Group i 161/120/The Vault
161 12/08/1989 11666 PLot PLan 11666 20~26 0012 Film 3821NIAO001
Group ! 161/120/The Vault
161 12/08/1989 11697 PLot PLan 11697 20~2& 001) film ~821NIAO001
Grc&; i 161/120/The Vault
161 12/11/1989 11669 PLot PLan 11669 20326 0012 Film 3821141A0001
Group ! 161/120/the Vault
161 12/13/1989 11681 PLot PLan 11681 20326 0012 Film 3821H1AO001
Group i 161/120/The Vault
161 12/18/1989 11688 plot plan 11688 20)26 001) file )821141A0001
Group i 161/120/the vault
161 12/19/1969 11721 PLot PLan 11721 20326 001) file 3821l!1A0001
Group i 161/120/The Vault
161 12/19/1989 11722 PLot PLan 11722 20326 0013 file )821141A0001
Group i 161/120/The Vault
16~'~1/01/1990 11720 PLot PLan 11720 20~.& 001) film 3821141A0001
Group ! 161/120/The Vault
161 01/09/1990 11720 PLot PLan 11720 20~2& 0013 film ~821N1AO001
Group t 161/120/The Vault
IIDESTY...IIR061 City of TamreaLm Pale
03/0711995 FILe leeely for Destruction 11s27z53
Doc. Ztem let. FILe Reference · Store Ibdto
Re/. Date lef. Brief Description Code lecurlty CLue Storage Location Lotion
161 01/10/1990 11685 PLot Nan 11685 2052& 0012 FILm 3821WIA~i
Grme Z 161/120/The VauLt
161 01/10/1990 11742 PLot PLan 11742 2([52& 0013 fitB 3821NIAO001
Group I 161/120/The VauLt ;
161 01/10/1990 11743 Not PLan 11763 2Q326 0013 film 3821NIAOQ01
Group ! 161/12Q/The VauLt
.............................................................. .---
161 01/12/1990 11731 PLot PLan 11731 2Q324 0013 film 3821NIAOO01
Group I 161/120/The VauLt
161 01115/199Q 11730 PLot PLan 117~Q 20~2& 0013 film 3821N1A(X)Q1
Group t 161/12Q/The VauLt
161 ol/16/199o 11736 PLot PLan 11736 7032A 0013 film ~aZ1NIAOO01
Group I 161/12Q/The VauLt
161 01/19/1990 11750 PLot PLan 11750 2Q32& 0013 film 3821NIAO001
Group I 161/120/The VauLt
........................................................... ~ ......
161 01/20/1990 11761 PLot PLan 11761 2Q324 0013 film 3821NIAO001
Group I 161/12Q/The VauLt
161 01/22/1990 117~ PLot PLan 11744 20324 0013 film 3821NIAQOQ1 '-
Group i 161/120/The VauLt
161 ol/23/1990 11765 PLot PLan 11765 20~24 0013 film 3821N1A0001
Group ! 161/12Q/The VauLt
161 01/75/1990 11756 PLot PLea 11756 20324 0013 film 3821N1AOOO1
Group ! 161/12Q/The VauLt
161 Q1/23/199Q 11757 PLot PLan 11757 2032& 0013 film 3821N1AOOO1
Group i 161/12Q/The VauLt
161 01/29/1990 11759 PLot PLan 11759 20324 0013 film 3821N1AQOQ1
Qroup ! 161/12Q/The VauLt
............................................................
161 Q1/)Q/199Q 11752 PLot PLan 11752 20324 0013 film 3821NIAQ(X)l
QrcAe I 161/120/Th, VauLt
161 02/05/1990 11767 PLot PLan 11767 2032& 0013 film a821N1AOOOl
Group z 161/120/The VauLt
161 02/05/1990 11772 PLot PLan 11772 2032& 0013 film 3821N1AQOQ1
Group ! 161112Q/The VauLt
161 02/08/1990 11783 PLot PLan 11783 2037A 0013 film 3821NIAQO01
Group ! 161/120/The VauLt
161 02/13/1990 11786 PLot PLan 11786 20324 0013 film 3821N1A(X)01
Group i 161/120/The VauLt
ILeESTY...RR061 City of Talecute Page 6
66/07/1995 Fi Lee Ready for Destruction 11:27:53
D//'~ item Itet. FILe Reference · Storage lieclio
R~ ' Date lef. Brief Description Code Security CLams Storage Location Leration lieferN
161 02/21/199Q 11801 PLot PLan 11801 Z(X326 QQ13 film 3821N1AOO01
Gro~ ! 1~1/120/The Vault
161 02/22/199Q 11819 PLot PLan 11819 2032& QQ13 film 3821NIAQQ01
Group z 161/1~0/Th, Vault :
161 02/Z3/1990 11808 PLot PLan 118O8 2662& QQ13 film 3821N1AOOOl
Qroq~ I 161/120/The Vault
161 02/26/1990 11811 PLot PLan 11811 ~66~& 0013 film 3821NIAOOOl
Group i 161/120/The VauLt
161 02/26/1990 11812 PLot PLan 11812 20326 0013 film 3821N1AOO01
Group I 161/120/The VauLt
161 02/26/1990 11817 PLot PLan 11817 2032& 0013 film 3821NIAO001
Groq) ! 161/120/The VauLt
161 02/26/1990 11820 PLot PLan 11820 2032& 0013 film 3821NIAO001
Group ! 161/120/7he VauLt
161 02/28/1990 1181& PLot PLan 1181& 2032& 0013 film 3821N1AO001
~ Group ! 161/120/The VauLt
16. ,2/28/1990 11815 PLot PLan 11815 2032& 0013 film 3821NIAOO01 '
Group i 161/120/The VauLt
161 03/01/1990 11827 PLot PLan 11827 2032& 0013 film 3821NIAO001
Gro~ ! 161/120/The VauLt
161 03/01/1990 118~0 PLot PLan 118~0 2032& 0013 film 3821NIAO001
Group L 161/120/The VauLt
161 03/01/1990 11922 PLot PLan 11922 2032& 0013 film 3821N1AO001
Group i 161/120/The VauLt
161 03/08/1990 11876 PLot PLan 11876 2032& 0013 film 3821N1AOQ01
Group ! 161/1~Q/The Vault
161 03/09/1990 11858 PLot PLan 11858 2662~ 0013 film 3821NIAQOOl
Group L 161/IZO/Th, Vault
161 66/13/1990 11859 PLot PLan 118~9 ZOX& 0013 film
Gro~ t 161/1~0/Th, Vault
161 03/15/1990 1186~ PLot PLan 1186~ ~03~ QO13 film 2821Nl-A.__a~_
Group X 16111ZQ/The VeuLt
16~,~3/16/1990 11867 PLot PLan 11867 2662~ QQ13 film ~E1NIAOOOl
Group ! 161/126/The Vault
161 03/19/1990 11723 PLot PLan 11/23 20324. oo13 film 3E~INtAOOOl
Group Z 161/lZ0/Th, Vault
m)ESTY...nn0~l city ef TmecuLe Page 7
0310711995 FILe Reedy for Destruction 11:27:53
Doc. item Ret. FiLe Reference · Bterage Nedis "
Ref, Date Ref, Brief Description Cock Security CLass Storage Location Location Itefe.
161 03/19/199Q 11865 PLot PLan 11865 ~Q3~A QQ1) film ]8~INtAQQQ~
Group I 161/l~O/The VauLt
161 03/19/1990 11905 PLot PLan 11905 Z037~ 0013 film !INIAOOOl
Gr~4~ I 161/120/The VauLt
161 03/21119g0 11895 PLot PLan 11895 20326 001:3 film 3821N1AOOOl
Grcs4~ Z 161/120/The VauLt
161 03/27/1990 11886 PLot PLan 11886 Z(X3~ Q013 file 38~1NIAQQQ1
Group i 161/120/The Vault
161 03/Z7/1990 1189~ PLot PLan 1189& 2032& 0013 rite 3821N1AIXX)l
Grot~ I 161/120/The Vault
161 03/28/1990 1188A PLot PLan 118M 2032A 001:3 file 3821N1AQO01
Group ! 161/120/The Vault
161 03/Z9/1990 6 PLot PLan 4 2032/, 001:3 file 3821N1AOO01
Group ! 161/12Q/The Vault
161 04/03/1990 11927 PLot PLan 11927 20326 0013 file 3821NIAOO01
Group I 161/120/The VauLt
161 04/03/1990 6 PLot PLan 6 ZO37.& 001:3 file 3821NIAO001 /
Gro~ I 161/120/The VauLt
161 0~/09/1990 5 PLot PLan 5 ~Q3~ QQ13 film 38~lN1AQQ01
Group ! 161/12Q/The Vault
161 04/10/1990 10 PLot PLan 10 ~03Z~ QQ13 file 38~lNIAOOO1
Group ! 161/1201The Vault.
161 04/13/1990 7 PLot PLan 7 20326 QQ13 film ]8~IN1AQOQ1
Group i 161/120rrhe VauLt
161 04/19/1990 19 PLot PLan 19 ~032/. QQI~ file ~8~1N1~--n~01
Group I 161/12Q/The Vault
161 04/20/1990 8 PLot PLan 8 203~6 0013 file I1NIAQOQ1
Group z 161/1~O/The Vault
161 0412011990 9 PLot PLan 9 ~Q3~A QQ13 file 38~lNIA(XX)l
Group I 161/1~Q/The Vault
161 04/Z7/1990 18 PLot PLan 18 ~Q3Z6 Q016 film ~IN1AOOOl
Group ! 161/l~O/The Vault
161 04127/1990 20 PLot PLan ~Q ~Q3~ Q016 film 38211rlAOIX)l
Group X 161112Q/The Vault
161 05/04/1990 26 PLot PLan 26 203~ QQ16 file ~8~IN1AOOOl
Group ! 1611120/1'he Vault
ItitDESTY...RR061 City of Teemcute Pa~e 8
03/0711995 FiLe Ready for Oestnztfm lh27=53
[y/~ Item let. FiLe Reference # Store Nedis
k Date Ref. Brief Description Code Security CLass ItoreOe Lecetien Leeattee Reference
161 05/Qa/199Q 29 PLot PLan 29 2(3326 0016 film 3821N1AQQQI
sroup i 161/120/The Vault
161 05/111199Q .:52 PLot PLan 32 2032& QQ16 film 3821NIAOQQ1
Group t 161/12Q/The Vault ;
161 05/11/199Q 3& PLot PLan 3& 213326 Q016 ft tm 3821NIAQQQ1
Group z 161/120/The Vault
161 05/16/1990 12QQ9 PLot PLan 12(X)9 2032& Q013 film 3E1N1AOOOl
_ 6rot~ i 161/120/The Vault
161 05731/199Q 69 PLot PLan 69 20326 QQ16 fi Lm ~IN1AOQQI
Group i 161/120/The vault
161 06/05/1990 193 PLot PLan 193 2032& Q015 Film 3821NIAQ(X)l
Group Z 161/120/The Vault
161 QG/161199Q 66 PLot Plan 66 20526 QQ16 fi tm 3821NIAQQ01
Groqp i 161/12Q/The VauLt
161 06/18/1990 90 PLot PLan 90 2032& QQ16 fi Lm 3821NIAQQ01
Group i 161/12Q/The Vault
/~ .
1, 06/19/1990 68 PLot PLan 68 20326 0016 film 3821NIAQQQ1 '
Group ! 161/120/The Vault
161 06/20/1990 91 PLot PLan 91 20326 0016 film 3821HIAQQQ1
Grcx,1) I 161/1ZO/The Vault
161 06/21/1990 76 PLot PLan 76 20326 0016 film 3821N1AO001
Group i 161/120/The Vault
161 06/Z2/199Q 76 PLot PLan 76 213326 QQ16 film 3821NIAQ(X)1
Grot~ i 161/120rrhe VauLt
161 06/26/1990 77 PLot PLan 77 20326 0016 film )821NIAO001
Group ! 161/120/The Vault
161 07/02/1990 78 PLot PLan 78 20326 QQ16 film 3821NIAQO01
Group [ 161/120/The Vault
161 07/02/1990 80 PLot PLan 8Q 20326 QQ16 fi Lm 3821NIAOQQI
Group ! 161/12Q/The Vault
161 07/03/1990 82 PLot PLan 82 20326 (X)16 film 3821NIAQQQ1
Group X 161/120/The Vault
1/(;,t.----07/05/1990 83 PLot PLan 83 2032& QQ16 ft tm 3821NIAQQQ1
Group i 161/12Q/The VauLt
161 07/06/1990 87 PLot PLan 87 20326 0016 film 3821NIAIX)Q1
Group ! 161/120/The Vault
ItROEITY...ILI061 City of Tamecalm Page
0310711995 FI Lee needy fer Dastructlen 11xZT:S3
Doc. Item Bet. File Reference · Store Nedit
Ref. Date Bet. Brief kscriptlen" Cede lecurity elm Storage Leestim Leeet|en life,
161 07/11/1990 151 PLot PLan 151 ; 0015 film 3821NIAQO~
Group ! 161/120/The VauLt
161 07/11/1990 95 Plot Plan 95 2032& 0Ol& film 3821N1-A--N~--1
Group I 161/120/The Vault "
161 07/12/1990 1)5 Plot Plan 135 2032/, 0015 film 3821N1A0001
Gro~l) ! 161/120/The VauLt
161 07/12/1990 9/~ Plot PLan ~ 2032& 0016 film 3821N1A0001
Group ! 161/120/The VauLt
161 07/16/199Q 160 PLot PLan 160 20326 Q015 film 3821N1-s---n~-I
Group I 161/12Q/The VauLt
161 07/Z3/legQ I?Q PLot PLan 17Q 20326 QQ15 film a821Nl.'._M~__l
6ro~ I 161/12Q/The VauLt
161 07/26/1990 117 PLot PLan 117 20326 Q015 film ~aZlNl.'.~l
Group t 161/12Q/The VauLt
161 071261199Q 105 PLot PLan 105 20326 I)1)16 film 382tN1AQQQ1
Group I 161/12Q/The VauLt
161 071261199Q 106 PLot PLan 106 20326 Q014 film 3821,1A0001
Group ! 161/tZO/The VauLt
161 07/26/1990 107 PLot PLan 107 20326 0016 film )821N1AQ(X)1
Group ! 161/120/Tho VauLt
161 07/26/1990 108 PLot PLan 108 20326 QQ16 film )821N1AOOOl
Group i 161/120/The VauLt
161 07/27/1990 109 PLot PLan 109 Z0324 0016 film ~1111A0001
Group ! 161/120/The VauLt
161 0712711990 111 PLot PLan 111 2(2326 Q016 film 3821NIAQQQ1
Gro~ ! 161/lZO/The VauLt
161 07/3Q/1990 112 PLot PLan. 112 20326 QQ15 film 3821Nl:__MOl
~roup i 161/120/Th, VauLt
161 08/Q1/1990 2 PLot PLan 2 2032& 0013 film
Group ! 161/12Q/The VauLt
161 08/06/1990 116 PLot PLan 116 20326 QO15 film a821N1AOOOl
Group ! 161/12Q/The VauLt
161 08/06/1990 119 PLot PLan 119 20326 QQ15 film Sa21NIAOOOl
Group ! 161/120/The VauLt
161 08/07/1990 118 PLot PLan 118 20326 0015 film 3821N1AOOOl
Group ! 161/120/The VauLt
RRDESTY...RR061 City of Teemcute Page 10
03/07/1995 Files Reedy for Destruction 11:21:53
D//''' item let. FILe Reference # Storage liedie
R~ J Date Ref. Brief Description Code Security Ctm Store LocBtten Licetim leference
161 08/09/1990 12t) PLot Hen lZQ 2032& Q015 film 3821NIA(X)Q1
Group I 161/l~Q/The Vault
161 08/09/1990 122 PLot PLan 122 2032& Q015 file 3821N1AOOOl
Group Z 161/1tO/The Vault
161 o8/1~/1990 125 PLot PLan 125 ~Q37~ Q015 file 36Z1N1._u~_l
Qreap ! 161/12Q/The Vault
161 08/1&/1990 126 PLot Nan 126 2032& 0015 file 3821NIN)Q01
Group Z 161/120/The Vault
161 08/1&/1990 1~0 PLot PLan l&O] 2032& 0015 file 3821N1AO001
Group Z 161/120/The Vault
161 Q8/15/1990 128 PLot Ptsn 128 2032& QQ15 film 3821N1AQQQ1
GrcM~ I 161/12Q/The Vault
161 08/15/1990 129 PLot PLea 129 20326 QQ15 film 38~lNIAOOOl
Group ! 161/12Q/The Vault
161 08/15/199Q I?1 Plot PLan 171 20326 QQ15 film 3821N1AQOQI
~ Group ! 161/12Q/The Vault
16. d8/16/1990 130 PLot PLan 130 20326 Q015 film 3821MIAQ(X)1
Group ] 161/1tO/The Vault
161 08/20/1990 132 PLot PLan 132 20326 Q015 film 38~lN1AQQOl
Group ! 161/120/The Vault
161 08/20/1990 161 PLot PLan t~1 2032~ (X)15 film 3821N1AQOO1
Group ! 161/120frhe Vault
161 08/22/1990 1)~ Plot PLan 1)~ 20326 0015 film 3821Nl-s_n~--1
Group i 161/12Q/The Vault
161 08/22/1990 169 PLot PLan 1A9 2032& 0015 film 3821N1AOO01
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 0812311990 138 PLot PLan 138 20326 0015 film 3821NIAOO01
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 08/Z31199Q 139 PLot PLan 139 ~0326 Q015 film 3821NIAQQ01
Group ! 161/12Q/The Vault
161 Q6/23/1990 157 PLot PLan 157 20326 Q015 film 3821NIAQ(X)1
Gro~ ! 161/1~Q/The Viutt
16~--~q8/2~/1990 1~2 PLot PLan 162 ~Q3~ 0015 film 3821NIAOOOl
Group ! 161/12Q/The VauLt
161 08/26/199Q 163 PLot PLan 1A3 2032& Q015 film 3821NIAOQQ1
Gr~q~ ~ 161/1~Onhe V~utt
RIU)ESTY...RRQ61 City of TeemcaLm Page 11
0;/07/1995 FILOn Reedy for Destruction 11:ZF:53
Doc. Item let. FiLe Referefme · Store Nedle
Ref. Date Ref. Brief Description Code lecurlty CLass Storage Location Location lefo /
161 08/2/*/1990 l&& PLot PLan l&& 2032& Q015 film 3821NIA0001
Group I 161/12Q/The VauLt
161 o8/2/*/199o t&6 PLot PLan 1&6 2032& Q015 film 3821NIAOOOl
Group I 161/12Q/The VauLt "
161 08/2/*/1990 150 PLot PLan 150 2032& Q015 film 3821N1AOOOl
Group ! 161/12Q/The VauLt
161 08/29/1990 152 PLot PLan 152 Z032/* 0815 film 3821NIAOOO1
Gr'o; I 161/120/The VauLt
161 08/29/1990 153 PLot PLan 153 2032& 0815 film 3821N1AOQOI
ScaLe Z 161/120/The VauLt
161 08/30/1990 155 PLot PLan 155 2932& Q015 film 3821N1AOOO1
Group I 161/12Q/The vault
161 08/31/199o 156 PLot PLan 156 2032/* Q015 film 3821N1AiX)Q1
Group I 161/12Q/The VauLt
161 08/31/1990 166 PLot PLan 166 2032/* 0015 film 3821N1AOQ01
Group ! 161/120/The VauLt
161 09/C~/1990 158 PLot PLan 158 2032/, 0015 fill 3821NIAO001 ·
Group I 161/12Q/The VauLt
161 09/06/1990 161 PLot PLan 161 2032/* 0015 fill 3821N1.a.__n~_1
Group I 161/120/The VauLt
161 09/07/1990 162 PLot PLan 162 2032/* 0015 fill 3821N1AO001
Group I 161/120/The VauLt
161 09/07/1990 163 PLot PLan 163 2032/* 0015 film 3821N1AO001
Group I 161/120/The VauLt
161 09/1/*/1990 165 PLot PLan 165 2032/* 0015 film 3821N1AOO01
Group ! 161/120/The VauLt
161 09/19/1990 167 PLot PLan 167 2032/* 0015 fill 3821MIAO001
Group i 161/120/The VauLt
161 09/25/1990 1 PLot PLan 1 2032/* 0013 film 38211fi.a._nd~__1
Group ! 161/120/The VauLt
161 09/26/1990 176 PLot PLan 176 20~.& 0015 film 3821111A0001
Group ! 161/120/The VauLt
.................................................................
161 09/27/1990 17S PLot PLan 17~ 2032/* 0015 film 3821NIA0001
Group i 161/120/The VauLt
161 10/02/1990 17~ PLot PLan 179 2032& 0015 film 3821NIA001
Group ! 161/120/The VauLt
EIDEST~...RIt061 CIty of Tmmata M 12
e~/07/1995 FILe leecly for Mtrmien 11s~r~:5~
D/~ ]tee let. FiLe leferm # Storage MIle
Rk Date Ref. Brief Description Cede lecurity Ctau Itorage Location Location kferem
t61 10/Q~I199Q 189 PLot PLan 189 2032~ QQ15 Film ~821N1AQQQ1
Group ! 161/120/The Vault
161 10/05/1990 2OQ PLot PLan 200 2032& QQ15 film 3821NIAOOOl
Group z 1611120/The Vault
161 10/08/1990 190 PLot PLan 190 ~ 0015 FILm 38~llMAQQ01
Group ! 161./1ZO/The Vault
161 10/09/1990 187. PLot PLan 187. 20326 0015 Film 3821N1AO001
Gr(x~ ! 161/12D/The Vault
161 1010911990 188 Plot PLan 188 2032& 0815 Film 3821HIAQQQ1
Group ! 161/12Q/The Vault
161 10/10/1990 183 Plot PLan 183 2032~ QO15 Film 3821mAOOOl
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 10/11/1990 186 PLot Plan 186 20326 0815 Film 3821N1AOOOt
GrotF i 161/12Q/The Vault
161 10/11/1990 187 PLot PLan 187 2032~ 0815 Film ~aZ1N1AOOO1
~ Group i 161/120/The Vault
16. .0/12/1990 195 PLot PLan 195 2032~ QQ15 Film ~821N1AOOO1
Group ] 161/12Q/The Vault
161 10/15/1990 192 PLot PLan 192 20326 0815 Film 3821mAOOO1
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 10/16/1990 194 PLot PLan 194 20326 QQ15 Film 3821N1___~_1
Group i 161/120/The Vault
161 10/17/1990 201 PLot PLan 201 20326 0815 film 3821N1AOOOl
Group Z 161/120/The Vault
161 10/18/1990 199 PLot PLan 199 2052~ QQ15 film 3821,1A0001
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 10/22/1990 202 PLot PLan 202 2O326 QQ15 film 3821,1A0001
Grot4~ i 161/120/The Vault
161 10/22/199Q 20~ PLot PLan 2iX 20326 QQ15 film
r. roqp I 161/120/The Vault
161 10/23/1990 206 PLot PLan 206 20326 0015 film 3821NIAOOO1
Grow i 161/120/The Vault
16~--~D/26/199Q 20? Plot PLan 20? 20326 0815 film 3821N1AOOOl
Group ! 161/120/The Vault
161 10/26/1990 213 PLot PLan 213 20326 Q015 film ~aZ1,1AOOOl
Group t 161/12Q/The Vault
BIU)ESTY,,,RR061 City of Tamecute Pa~e 13
03/07/1995 FiLe leedy.~for Destructlen 11:27:53
Doc. Item let. FiLe Refertrice 18 Itorlge liBdim
net, Dote Ref, Brief hicriptlen Code Security CLass Storage LeeeLlen LocBtlon lof~
161 10/25/1990 209 PLot PLan 209 2032& 0015 fill )821NtAOO01
Groq} ! 161/120/The Vault
161 10/25/1990 210 PLot PLan 210 20324 0015 fi Lm 3821NIAOOOl
Qro~ i 1611120frhe vault :
161 10/26/1990 211 PLot PLan 211 2O324 QQ15 fi Lm 3821NIA0001
Group i 161/12Q/The VauLt
161 10/31/1990 217 PLot PLan 217 20324 0016 film 3821NIAOOO1
Groq} I 161112Q/The VauLt
161 11/01/1990 218 PLot PLan 218 20326 0016 fill 3821N1AOOOl
Group i 161/120/The VauLt
161 11/02/1990 10866 10866 20326 0017 FiLm 3821N1AO001
Group i 161/120/The VauLt
161 11/08/1990 220 PLot PLan 220 20326 0016 fill 3821NIAO001
Grot; ! 161/12Q/The VauLt
161 11/15/1990 221 PLot PLan 221 2032/* 0016 film 3821N1AOO01
Groqo i 161/120/The VauLt
161 11/19/1F~E) 8~ PLot PLan 86 20324 001/* film 3821NIA0001 /
Group i 161/120/The VauLt
161 12/12/1990 225 PLot PLan 223 2032/* 0016 film 3821NIAO001
Groqo i 161/120/The VauLt
161 01/1/*/1991 22/* PLot PLan 22/* 20326 0016 film 3821NIAO001
Group ] 161/120/The VauLt
161 01/17/1991 7.33 PLot PLan 253 ZO326 0016 FiLm 3821NIAOOO1
Group [ 1611120/The VauLt
161 02/0611991 203 PLot PLan 203 2032/, 0015 film 3821t11A001
Group i 161/120/Tho VauLt
161 02/0811991 179 PLot PLan 179 2032/, 0015 film ]BZ1N1AOOOl
Group i 161/120rrho VauLt
161 OZIZ211991229 PLot PLan 229 2032/* 0016 FiLm 3821N1AOO01
Group i 1611120/The VauLt
161 03/11/1991 228 PLot PLan 228 20326 0016 FiLm 3821N1AOOOl
Group i 1611120rrhe VauLt
161 03/12/1991227 PLot PLan 227 2032/* QQ16 FILm 3821NIA(XX)1 ~
6ro~ i 161/12Q/The VauLt
161 Q3115/1991 216 PLot PLan 216 20324 Q015 film 3821NIAQQOl
Groq; ~ 161/120/The VauLt
RRDESTY,,.ILeQ61 City of T/L1 Page
0310711995 Files Reedy far Destruction 11:~r~:$5
~ item let. FILe Reference I Storage NKIii
k Date Ref. Brief Deecrtptiee Cede Security CLass Storage LeeaLien Lecatlen Reference
161 03/20/199122~ PLot PLan 22A 2032& 0016 Fi LB )821NIAiXX)l
Group t 161/12Q/The VauLt
161 0~/22/1991 236 PLot PLan 236 20)7~ 0016 Fi Lm 3821N1AOOOl
Group ! 161/120/The VauLt
161 0~/25/1991 221 PLot PLan 221 2032& 0016 Fi Lm 3821N1AO001
Group x 161/120/The VauLt
161 0~/29/1991 220 PLot PLan 230 2032/* 0016 FiLm SBZlNl.'.__nO0_l
Group I 161/120/Tho VauLt
161 05/06/1991 222 PLot PLan 222 2032/* 0016 FiLm )821N1AOOOl
Group Z 161/120nhe vault
161 05/29/1991 225 PLot PLan 225 2032& 0016 FiLm S821N1AOOOl
Group ! 161/120/The VauLt
161 O6/1/*/1991 238 PLot PLan 238 2032/, 0016 FiLm 3821N1AOOOl
Group i 161/120/The VauLt
161 O6/17/1991 239 PLot PLan 229 2O32/* 0016 FiLm 3821N1AOOOl
Group Z 161/lZO/The VauLt
....................................................... *_ ......
1, ~8/06/1991 2/*0 PLot PLan 2/*Q 2032/* 0016 FiLm 3821N1AQQQ1
Group I 161/120/The VauLt
161 08/09/1991 2/.1 PLot PLan 2/.1 2032/* 0016 FiLm )821N1AOOOl
Group Z 161/1;O/The VauLt
161 11/0~/1991 2/.3 PLot PLan 2/*3 2032/* 0017 FiLm 3BZlK1Aoool
GroLe ! 161/120/The VauLt
161 11/25/1991 2/*2 PLot PLan 242 2032/* 0017 FiLm 3821N1AOOOl
Group i 1611120/The VauLt
161 02/21/1992 2/~ PLot PLan 2A/, 2032/* 0017 FiLm ~821Nt~_n~O_l
Group ! 161/1;O/The VauLt
161 06/17/1992 225 PLot PLan 225 2032/* 0016 FiLm )B;1NtAOOOl
Gro~q~ i 1611120/Th, VauLt
161 Q?/15/1992 2/*5 PLot PLan 2/*5 203~ 0017 Fi Lm )821N1A0001
Group Z 161/120/The VauLt
161 07/15/199Z Z~6 PLot PLan 2~6 2032/* 0017 FiLm 38Z1N1AQ001
Group i 161/1;O/The VauLt
1(~----07/30/1992 2/,? PLot PLan 2/*7 2032/* 0017 film ~a21N1A0001
GrCN4~ I 161/lZO/The VauLt
161 08/19/199Z 2/*9 PLot PLan 2/*9 20326 0017 film )aZIHIA0001
Group i 161/120/The VauLt
RRDESTY...IRQ61 City of Teacute Pale 15
Q3/Q?/1995 FIre. Reedy for Detr~tion 11
Do¢. tim let. FiLe Reference # Store~e Nedte
Ref. Dete Ref. Brief Deecrlptlan' Code Security elm Storage L~catlen Locitim lef~ /
161 10/13/1992 2&8 PLot PLan 2&8 2032& 0017 FILl 3821NIAOOOt'
Group ! 161/12Q/The VauLt
253 Records Processed
ITEM 7
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY
~OF 'r]~MECULA, RECITING THE FACT OF ~ SPECIAL
MUNICIPAL ADVISORY ELvCTION HELD ON MARCH 7,
1998, DECI2kRING ~ ~T AND SUCH OTHER
MA~ AS PROVIDED BY LAW
WHl4;lfl?,A,~, a Special Municipal Advisory Election was held and conducted in the City
of Temectfia, C~llfornia, on Tuesday, March 7, 1995, u required by hw; and
WHEREAS, notice of the election was given in time, form and manner as provided by
law; that voting precincts were properly established; that election officers were appointed and
that in all respects the election was held and conducted and the votes were cast, received and--
canvassed and the returns made and declared in time, form and manner as required by the
provisions of the Elections Code of the State of California; and
,.
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 94-116, adopted December 7, 1994, the County
Election Department canvassed the returns of the election and on March 14, 1995 certified the
results to this City Council, the restfits are received, attached as "Exhibit A.,
NOW TI~REFORE, ~ CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, DOES
RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETER.MINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the whole number of ballots cast in the City was 8,187.
Section 2. That the measur~ voted upon at the election is as follows:
Measure "B" - Advisory Vote - Old Town Entertainment Center
Section 3. That the number of votes given at each precinct and the number of votes
given in the city for and against the measure were as in the Registrar-Recorders Certification
listed in Exhibit *A* attached.
Section 4. That as a restfit of the election, a majority of the voten voting on Measure
'B' relating to the Old Town Entertainment Center for the City of Temectfia, did vote in favor
of it, and that the measure was carried, and shall be deemed adopted and ratified.
Section S. The City Clerk shall enter on the records of the City Council of the City, a
statement of the restfit of the election, showing: (1) The whole number of ballots cast in the
City; (2) The measure voted upon; (3) The number of votes given at each precinct to each
person, and for and against the measure; (4) The Wtal number of votes for an against the
measure.
P,~.~os~55 I
Section 6. The City Clerk shah certify the adoption of this resolution.
APPRO~ AND ADOFrED, thi~ 28th day of March, 1995.
ATT~T:
Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor
June S. Or~k, City Clerk
[SEPAL)
R~os~55 2
STATE OF C~,L~ORNIA)
coxnq~r ox= ~n~ ss
crryox~Ts~mLr~7_~ )
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of time City of Temecula, FrI~-~Y DO CERTIFY that the
foregoing Resolution No. ~- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of
'-the Ci~ of Temec-ls on the 28th day of March, 199~ by the following roll call vole.
COUN~~mERS:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNcrLMI~MBERS:
COUNt:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
ResoeLS5 3
if, XiIIBtT A
COUNTY OF R~VERSHDE
COUNTY CLERK-RECORDER, REGISTRAR
JAME~ E. BRIDGi~
CHIEF DEPUTY REGISTRAR
IN, lima E. Frlnco ~
1260 Palmyma Avenue
River~Oe. CA 92507-~ 70;,
t909) 275,8700
FAX 1909~ 275-8733
CERTIFICATE OF REGISTRAR OF VOTERS
TO THE RESULTS OF THE CANVASS OF ELECTION RETURNS
State of California)
)ss.
County of Riverside )
I, DELFINA E. FRANCO, Chief Deputy Registrar of Voters of said County, do hereby certify
that, in pursuance of the provisions of Sections 307 and 15301 of the California Elections Code
and the resolution adopted by the City Council, I did canvass the returns of the vote cast at the
Special Municipal Advisory Election held on ~ 7, 1995 in the
CITY OF TEMECULA
and I further certify that the statement of votes cast, to which this certificate is attached, shows
the whole number of votes cast for and against Measure B which was submitted to a vote of the
voters, at said election in said City and in each precinct therein, and that the totals as shown for
and against said measure are full, true and correct.
Dated this 14th day of March, 1995
FRANK K. JOHNSON
COUNTY CLERK-RECORDER, REGISTRAR
Chief Deputy ~ of Vote~
·
·
s,
·
0
I
I
I
ITEM 8
FROM: '
DATE:
SUBJECT:
AFFROVAT-
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City.Engineer
March 28, 1995
Contract Change Order No. I for FY94-95 Slurry Seal Project, Project.
No. PW94-12
PREPARED BY: ~,Brad Buron, Maintenance Superintendent
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council approve Contract Change Order No. I for materials, labor and equipment
for various items of work in the amount of e10,721.30.
BACKGROUND:
During the construction of the FY94-95 Slurry Seal Project, the following item of work has
resulted in a change to the contract. The Contract Change Order is as follows:
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. I
After reevaluating the project scope of work for the project, there were some areas
that needed a slurry seal coating but were not included in the original scope of work.
Therefore, by adding these new slurry seal areas to the project, there would be a
substantial savings to the City by doing the work now and we can protect these areas
from further pavement deterioration.
TOTAL: $ 28,715.39
FISCAL IMPACT:
On October 18, 1994 the City Council awarded a contract for the construction of FY94-95
Slurry Seal Project to Roy Allan Slurry Seal, Inc. for $179,940.89. Contract Change Order No.
1 is in the amount of $28,715.39 which is $10,721.30 over the projects contingency.
Therefore, an additional $10,721.30 must be approved for the FY94-95 Slurry Seal Project,
and adequate funds are available in the Public Works Department, Routine Street Maintenance
Budget Account #100-164-601-5402.
Attachment
Contract Change Order No. I
r:~agdrpt~95M)328~w94-12.ood,jp
~T BY:
0-22-M; 9:47AN; CITY 0F ~-
.City_ of T rn cul
43174 BuSiness Park DrA,~ * l'emccuZa. Ca2brrUa 92590
Fyta4-ge N,.rrv 8e,I Pr~r-t
;# 2/2
Rov Aller~ Rllarrv em"l. Ir~.
694-1989 · FAX (9091 694-1999
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER N0. 1
CONTRACT NO, PW94,-12
SHEET _1_ of ..1_
TO CONTRACTOR:
NOT~ This ~hange oral Jr b m effective until aforoved bv the Fp-lneer.
CNANGE REQUE81'ED BY: Br~d Buron, Maintenance Superintendent
OR
An INCREASF in thee following ~tems:
:. {
Alter reevalueting the ,qcope of work for the project, there were some areas that
needed a slurry seal caatlno but ware not included in the original scope of work.
Therefore, bY adding these new alurry Hal area8 to the project, there wouid be
substantial Savings to the City by doing the work now and we can protect these areas
from further!pavement deterioration.
TOTAL: 4;28,716.39
.............................. $ 179,940.89
.............................. $ 197,93¢,98
.............................. $(+)10,121.30
.............................. $ 208,656.28
Original Contrg~ Ar~ount ..
Adjusted Contract Amount ,.
Change Order No, 1 , ......
Total Contract AmOunt .....
Adjustment of Calendar Days ~ ................... ,, ...........
Approved; Meint:. Superinterident By: .__~-,~ ~./~"'--,L_ Date:
WE t~ ~dg~ ~n~act0r ~ve ~V~ cKoM ~jd~ ~ tM C~ ~Opo~ a~ ~eby
~Mal is approve. ht we w;U ;rovFde at em~. f~ i m~edal$, ue~ M my ~Nrw~e ~ rated
Qate Accepted: N.R&~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~- c~actor: RoY AI~ Sh wry Seal
(;ompeny's
By: ~' ~' ~~ Title: ~ P..~& (~.& (~gnakure) j"
If ~ contm~ d~s n~ ~gn eccepte~e of mis mr, his a~emion ~ dire~ to th$
requirements of ~ ~Hcifi:atfo~s as to ~eeding wi~ the ~dered work e~ Fding a walden
protest wim[n ~e rime ~rein speedlied.
ITEM 9
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
~kPPROVAI-
crrY ATTORNEY
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
March 28, 1995
Contract Change Order No. I for FY94-95 Citywide P.C.C. Repair
Program, Project No. PW94-13
PREPARED BY: ~ Brad Buron, Maintenance Superintendent
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council approve Contract Change Order No. 1 for materials, labor and equipment
for various items of work in the amount not to exceed $8,067.53.
BACKGROUND:
During the construction of the FY94-95 Citywide P.C.C. Repair Program the following items
of work have resulted in a change to the contract.
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. I
Provide additional concrete work and removals for installation of new sidewalks at
various locations throughout the City
Provide additional concrete work for installation of e new cross gutter located at the
intersection of Moreno Road and Front Street.
3. Provide additional concrete work for installation of new curbs Citywide.
Provide additional concrete work for installation of a new 6" driveway approach located
near Front Street and Main Street.
e
Provide additional work for the re-compaction of wet sub-grade and replacement of
asphalt concrete pavement at the intersection of Moreno Road and Front Street.
Provide for an increase in cost per square foot for bid Item No. B due to reduction in
quantity and since the construction areas were scattered throughout the City
SUB-TOTAL of INCREASES:
$20,942.31
r:.~qd~pt~5~328~,~-13.cc~ejp
nUANTfflF:S ADJUSTMINT'R:
The original contract bid quantity estimates were revised to reflect the actual quantities
constructed in the field. Bid Item No. B decreased by 312 L.F. The cost difference for this
item results in a decrease of $7,644.00.
SUB-TOTAL DECREASES:
$7,644.00
TOTAL ADJUSTED CONTRACT CHANGES:
3,298,31 :
Utilizing the projects contingency, which was approved for this project, will account for ·
portion of the additional cost in the amount of $5,230.78.
ADDITIONAL FUNDS REQUESTED: $8,067.53
FISCAL IMPACT:
On October 18, 1994 the City Council awarded a contract for the FY94-95 Citywide P.C.C.
Repair Program to Hillcrest Contracting for $52,307.85. Contract Change Order No. I is in
the amount of $13,298.31, which is $8,067.53 over the projects contingency of $5,230.78.
Therefore, an additional amount of $8,067.53 must be approved for the FY94-95 Citywide
P.C.C. Repair Program. Adequate funds are available in the Public Works Department, Routine
Street Maintenance budget Account #100-164-601-5402.
r.',q~tws~a28Vw94-13.c~o/~
Mar 22 '95 10:30 P.02/03
cl'r~ o~' 'i'd211~ BOB 273 BO08:I 9/a
Of T mecula
QONTRA69' 2NAIIgN ~ NO. ¶
el. lET
NOTi: :~]JLIbIIILNtlt Is not tfuc':w.--liMLiee~l by ~
CI-INIOilQNQUIBTED BY: Brad Buron, IVieintmqf~e 8, 9.rjnandent
~ CHANClt FRO VIDES FOR:
A~ II~-RFk~E tn the fdlowing lsm,:
Provfde additionel concrete wolk end reinHie fo~ installation of new dalewalks
Citywide.
ILl-TOTAL; 43,278.00
Provide edditienel oonerete wek and remevelm fer k, :lm4si'.en of · raw era Gutter
located etlhe intlrllgtJen 431 Ivlmeo Reed end From' gtreet.
tLMI-TOTAL:
3. il~ovkle additional ,'ancrfte work for inltallmiOn of new a Citywide.
6UIPTOTAI.., $1,732,B0
Provide additiomd gonefete wetit for ifetelllition of · new 6" thiQk driveway mpproe~
Iogated rear Front tPeet oM klein heel.
81JD-TrrAL~ 4751;0Q
P~o~cle ,ddi~enel work for the N-oompmot~ of wet **jb*Oraido end mplBaer,~n'C Of
upbeat concrete pevemefX leated It The inersection of Mofano ROECl Bad Front
IUB-TOTAL;
Provide fer en ir~,2rammm in ooet per acluee foot fix' bkl Item No. · due to redued~ in
qulnety end dace The egneugtae Irm were nettrod throughout the City,
lUll-TOTeM.: ,4pIIJ.44
CITY ~ IlM~CILA* le 278 lla08;# 3/3
(lllMllTlll Ar~_L_m'~!INTI:
TIm odllirml ltdlb.S,t lid II ellmltll will avisill to riftlit N letill {llmmtlll
~mmmoied kl 1he Rekf. Id !tern No. I h~l ImndlV tlce II1 tie ~ of
~17,mt4,to~; The mat dlre;, =zm for INs itmm rearm in e dearssee o~ ¢$?,e44.00>,
tUI-TOI'AL: < 17,144.06 >
TOTAL:
0dgiMd Cmtm=t Amount ................................ ,
ProJab1 Condngmnm/ .... ,, ..... , ....................... ,...
Ad,~ltlld {:}mot Amma~t '
chmn~orirmo~ ............................ , ..........
Total Contract Amount ....................................
AU~, 'Iraant of Calendar I:),ya ................ , ............... _~,
I 52,307,66
I 6,230.78.
I 87,Sal.el '
· I + 18017,5,1.
I 68,606.16
Name:
(Gompany'e name)
Titis: Vi,,m-Prwaldm~t.
If the Goatrector does not llgn maeptanGi ot d~l cider, hi attention ie Jkaoted
mquirlmenll i:lf tlt llloib~ Is to woceedinO with Ihl orderIll work and filing
~m,t within tie ~me thamin ruMOred.
ITEM 10
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
March 28, 1995
"No Parking" Zone on Margarita Road from Rancho Vista Road to Pauba
Road from 6:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Weekdays
PREPARED BY:
Martin C. Lauber, Traffic Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
The Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution
entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 95-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ESTABLISHING "NO PARKING '" ZONE ON
MARGARITA ROAD FROM RANCHO VISTA ROAD TO PAUBA
ROAD FROM 6:00 A.M. TO 4:00 P.M. WEEKDAYS
BACKGROUND:
The Traffic Division of the Department of Public Works has received a letter from Temecula
Valley School District requesting the relocation of their bus loading zone on Margarita Road
(see attached letter). This item was previously included as part of our High School traffic
operations study conducted in 1993. The existing loading zone was implemented under an
emergency condition due to the short notice provided by the school district, prior to the
beginning of high school classes.
The existing parking restriction allows for bus parking from the existing campus access gate,
on the east side of Margarita Road, north to the right turn lane at Rancho Vista Road. The
area south of the campus access gate is open parking for students, parents, or teachers. The
bus loading zone is currently restricted from 6:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. weekdays in order to
provide additional parking in the evening and weekends for sporting event parking. If the
loading zone is moved, it would not impact the total number of vehicular parking spaces
available. The only detriment to the current arrangement is the Iogistics of maneuvering large
busses from the curb to the left turn pocket at Rancho Vista Road.
The change in driving behaviors due to such. a change is not predictable. The only certain
improvement would be the ability of bums to traverse two (2) throughlanes in order to make
a left turn onto Rancho Vista Road.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Sign Relocation - 2 Signs ~) ~65 = ~ 130
Red Curb - ~) $.58/L.F. X 300' = 174
TOTAL $ 304
Attaconebts:
Resolution No. 95-
Letter from Temecula Valley Unified School District
Exhibit "A"
r.~d~t~gS~tB2S~Fk~n.ms/ajp
RESOLUI'ION NO.
A RESOI,UHON OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ESTABLLq!~!NG "NO PAl/KING" ZONE
MARGARITA ROAD FROM RANCHO VISTA ROAD TO PAUBA
ROAD FROM 6.-00 AM. TO 4:00 P.M. W~-~K,~AYS
The City Camoil of the City of Temec,,!l does resolve, determin~ and order as follows:
_S~jon 1. Pursuant to Section 10.16.160, of the Temecula Municipal Code, 'No Parking'
zone is hereby established in the City of Temecula on Margarita Road from Rancho Vista Road to Pauba
Road from 6:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. as shown on Exhibit 'A'.
Section 2. The City Clerk shall certif}, to the passage and adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOFrED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a
regular meeting held on the 28th day of March, 1995.
Jeffrey Stone, Mayor
'/" ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
r:.~lq,t~95~a328~opzizem.tht/tjp
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) SS
CrrYOFTEMECULA )
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do certify that the foregoing
Resolution No. 9~- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Temecula on the 28th day of March, 1995 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: 0
NOES: 0
ABSTAIN: 0
ABSENT: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILlVlEMBERS:
COUNCILlVlEMBERS:
COUNCH..MLqVIBERS:
Juue S. G-reek, City Clerk
TEMECULA VALLEY
Unified School District
SUPERINTENDENT
JA;,' ? '"
January 19, 1995
City of Temecula
43174 Business Perk Drive
Temeuula, CA 92591
Attention:
Mr. Marry Lauber
Traffic Engineer
Dear Marry,
Pursuant to our most recent discussions, I am reguesting that
you bring before the city Traffic Commission the Tamecula
Valley High School perking issue. As you will recall, the
Temecula Valley Unified School District school buses pick up
and drop off on ~he nor=hem section of Margerita Road and
students perk along the southern end of Mergerita Road.
As the buses leave the high school in the afternoon, a
potential traffic hazard becomes ~uite apperent. The majority
of the buses turn left onto Rancho Vista Road and, because of
the traffic congestion and the limited access to ~he left lane,
an unsafe situation exists.
The District's request is that bus passenger loading and
unloading be on the southern end of Mergarita Road and that
student parking be placed on the northern end of Margarita
Road. Temecula Valley High has been contacted and has no
problems with the change.
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.
Sincerely,
Forrest Thomas
Director of Transportation/
Safety Administrator
FT: cr
31350 Rancho V~m Road / Temecula. CA 92592 1 (909) 676.-2661
Gr VO
V,Z I ~r V9 ~ vl4r
<E
[] --~
Z -
°//'
1,
D
E
ITEM 11
TO:
~FROM:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
DATE:
City Council/City Manager
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
March'28, 1995
SUBJECT: Parcel Map No. 28084- Hold Harmless Agreement
PREPARED BY: Vu~aymond A. Casey, Principal Engineer - Land Development
,Annie Bostre-Le, Engineering Technician
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council:
Approve the Hold Harmless Agreement with BA Properties, Inc.
Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the agreement.
BACKGROUND:
On September 25, 1990, City Council approved Parcel Map No. 21383. Subdivision
Agreements and Surety Bonds were submitted by Rancho Core Associates No. 1. On January
10, 1995, City Council approved the partial reduction of Faithful Performance Bond Amounts
for Parcel Map No. 21383..
On January 12, 1995, the Planning Director of the City of Temecula approved Tentative Parcel
Map No. 28084for reverting a portion of Parcel Map No. 21383to acreage. Final Parcel Map
No. 28084 was approved by City Council on January 24, 1995.
The owner of Parcel Map No. 28084 and the City have agreed that certain warranty and
other repair items must be accomplished related to the bond work previously accomplished
by Parcel Map No. 21383. The owners of Parcel Map No. 28084 have completed the bond
work to the City's satisfaction. The City has imposed that the Owner record a Hold Harmless
Agreement in lieu of substituting bonds for the underlying Parcel Map No. 21383 bonds for
future warranty and other repair works that may be required related to the bond work.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
Attachments:
1. Hold Harmless Agreement
-1 - r:%agdfpt%95'tO328%pm28084.egr
RECORDED AT REQUEST OF
AND ~ RECORDED RETURN TO:
June Greek, CityClerk
CITY OF TEMECULA
4317d Bu~ness Park Drive
Temecola, California 92~90
EXEMPT FROM RECORDER'S FEES
PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE
SECTIONS 6103 AND 2T~83
HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT
THIS HOLD HARMI-FSS AGREEMENT (this "Agreement") is made and entered into
this day of , 1995, between the CITY OF TE~F_,CULA, a municipal
corporation, bereinafter refen'ed to as "City" and BA PROPERTIES, INC., a Delaware
corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Owner." In consideration of the mutual promises and
covenants contained herein, the parties hereto mutually agree as follows:
Section 1. RECITALS. This Agreement is made and entered into with respect to
the following facts, which are acknowledged as true and correct by the parties hereto:
a. In connection with final approval of Parcel Map No. 21383, Owner's
predecessor-in-interest posted bonds for sweets, drainage, sewer, water, survey monuments,
traffic signal, taxes and grading (collectively, the "Parcel Map No. 21383 Bonds"). Owner's
predecessor-in-interest accomplished some of the work contemphted by the Parcel Map No.
21383 Bonds, all of which related to the Remainder Property (described below).
b. Owner is desirous of obtaining final approval from the City of Planning
Application No. PA94-0120, Tentative Parcel Map No. 28084 and PA94-0121, Reversion to
Acreage (co~ectively, the "F-ntitlements"), covering a portion of the real property affected by
Parcel Map No. 21383 (the "Parcel Map No. 28084 Property"). That portion of the ~
property affected by Parcel Map No. 21383 which is not a part of the Parcel Map No. 28084
Property shall be referred to sometimes hereinaft~ as the "Remainder Property." The Parcel
Map No. 28084 Property and the Remainder Property are more specifically described in Exhibits
"A" and "B," respectively, attached hereto and incorporated herein by thi.~ reference.
c. In connection with the final approval of the Entitlements, the City is
willing to release that portion of the Parcel Map No. 21383 Bonds related to the Parcel Map No.
28084 Property. However, Owner and the City have agreed that certain warranty and other
repair items must be accomplished related to the bond work previously accomplished by Owner' s
predecessor-in-interest, as more particularly identified on Exhibit "C" attached hereto and
incorporated herein by ~ reference (the "Bond Work").
d. While Owner has now complel~ the Bond Work to the City's satisfaction,
the City is concorned about~ future wanmy and other repair work that may be mtuired
related to the Bond Work. Conseqtumfiy, the City has impo. sed Condition No. 30 to the
approval of the Entitlements whichrequires that Owner record a Hold Harmless ~nt in
lieu of substituting bonds forthe Bond Work (the 'Hold Harmless Condition'). The panks now
desire to enter into and record this Agreement in order to satisfy the Hold Harmless Condition.
Section 2. OWNER TO HOLD CITY HARMI.I?-~S WITH RESPECT TO THE
BOND WORK. Owner hereby agrees to indemnify and bold harmless the City, its officers,
employees and agents from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City, its advisory
agencies, appeal boards or legislative body in any way related to the Bond Work and the City's
release of the Parcel Map No. 21383 Bonds specifically related thereto.
Section 3, SATISFACTION OF CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, This Agreement
satisfies Condition No. 30 to the approval of the Entitlements provided this Agreement remains
valid, binding and enforceable against Owner, its successors and assigns. In the event thi~
Agreement is for any reason invalid, or for any reason not binding or enforceable against the
Owner or its successors or assigns, then the Owner, on behalf of itseft and its successors and
assigns, acknowledges that it is obligated to indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers,
employees and agents from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City, its advisory
agencies, appeal boards or legislative body in any way related to the Bond Work and the City: s
release of the Parcel Map No. 21383 Bonds specifically related thereto.
Section 4. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement contains the entire
understanding between the City and Owner with respect to Condition No. 30 of the Entitlements
and the matters stated herein. Any prior agreements, promises, negotiations or representations
not expressly set forth herein are of no force or effect. Subsequent modifications to this
Agreement shall be effective only if in writing and signed by all parties. If any term, condition
or covenant of this Agreement is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void
or unenforceable, the rem3inin~ provisions of this Agreement shall be valid and binding.
Section 5. WAIVER, Waiver by any party hereto of any term, condition, or
covenant of this Agreement shall not constitute the waiver of any other term, condition, or
covenant hereof.
Section 6. BINDING EFFECT.
a. Of the covenants which have been established pursuant to this Agreement,
the same shall be deemed to be covenants nmning with the land for the benefit of the City in
carrying out its statutory responsibilities under California law and to enforce the provision of
the Temecula General Plan and the Conditions of Approval of the Enti~ements. The Covenants
contained in this Agreement shall be binding for the benefit of the City and its successors and
assigns, and such covenants shall nm in favor of the City for the entire period during which such
covenants shah be in force and effect, without regard to whether the City is or remains an owner
of any land or interest therein to which such covenants relate.
H1.DHRM~.AGM/1
8010.001/031495 - 2 -
b. This Agreement shall be binding upon the heirs, executors, admini~fators,
successors and assigns of tbe partim hemo; providmi, bowever, upon lt~ transfor of all or any
portion of the ~ prol~VJ affect~ by ~ Agreement, Owner shall be released from its
obligations ~ this Agreement with respect to such tr~rt~.tred propcxty and the City agrees
to look only to the new owner(s) of such propca ty for enforcement of thi.~ Agreemetn.
Seelion 7. ATfORNEYS' FI~-~. If litigation is reasonably required to enforce or
interpret the provisiom of thi.~ Agreement, the prevailing party in such litigation shatl be entified
to an award of reasonable attorneys' fees and costs, in addition to any other relief to which it
may be entified.
Section 8. NOTICES. Any notices or other correspondence between the parties shall
be sent to the foHowin~ unless either party gives the other notice of a change of address:
CITY OF TEMECUI~
Director of Public Works
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecnla, California 92590
OWNER
BA PROPERTIES, INC.
333 South Beaudry Avenue
21st Floor; Unit 4242
Los Angeles, California 90017
Arm: Sandy Throop
Section 9. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Agreement shall only become effective upon
the final approval by the City of the Enti~ements and recordation of Final Parcel Map No.
28084, and shall terminate and be of no further force or effect upon the one ( 1 ) year anniversary
of the recordation date of this Agreement.
Notice shall be effective upon personal delivery, delivery by courier service or three business
days following deposit in the United States Mail, postage prepaid, certified.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be
executed the day and year first above written.
CITY OF TE~IECULA
Jeff Stone
Mayor
HLDHRMI~.AGM/1
8010.001/03149~ - 3 -
ATTEST:
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter M. Thorson
City Auorney
By:
OWNER
BA PROPERTIES, INC., A Dclawar~ Corporation
Its': /'-, ? ';"' '
HI,DHRMI,S.AGM/I
S010.001/tBI495 - 4 -
ALL-HJRPOSE ACKNOWIII~~
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
On , before me, , Notary
Public, personally appeared , personally known to me (or
proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are
subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the
same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the
instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the
instrument.
WITNF_SS my hand and official seal.
SIGNATURE OF NOTARY
D
D
INDrV/DUAL(S)
OFFICER(S) (TIT~-~{S]):
CAPACITY CLAIMED
BY SIGNER
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
PARTNER(S)
ATTORNEY-IN-FACT
TRUSTEE(S)
SUBSCRIBING WITNESS
GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR
CHAIRPERSON/MAYOR
OTI-W~R:
SIGNER IS REPEESENTING:
(SOlO.COl/!s~lissrm.s~)
HLDIgLzI3.AI3M/I
8010.001/031495 - ~ -
ACKNOW~.~
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF T,O- ~-aeq e-)
On March 17. 1995 before me, Philomena A. Serrao a
Notary Public in and for the State of California, personally
appeared' Sandy Cae.idy m~d S~4y Throo~ personally known to me
(or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the
persons whose names are subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that they executed the same in their
authorized capacities, and that by their signatures on the
instrument the persons, or the entity upon behalf of which the
person[s] acted, executed the instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
(Signature)
PHILOMENA A. $ERRAO
co .
Notary Pulallc -- California
(Space above for official
notarial seal)
Page I of 2
EXHIBIT "A"
Parcels 20 through 46, inclusive; 48 through 71, inclusive; 76 through 88, inclusive; 122
through 130 inclusive; all of Parcel Map No. 21383, as shown by Parcel Map on file in Book 167
Pages 18 through 25, inclusive, of Parcel Maps, Records of Riverside County, California;
together with Parcel 47; Parcels 72 through 75, inclusive of said Parcel Map adjusted as Parcels
A through E as shown by Lot Une Adjustment No. 20 recorded August 7, 1992 as instrument
No. 293333 of Official Records of Riverside County, California; together with that portion of
Parcel 119, Parcels 120 and 121 of said Parcel Map adjusted as Parcels A through C as shown
by Lot Line Adjustment No. 21 recorded November 20, 1991 as instrument No. 40458 of Official
Records of Riverside County, California, more particularly described as follows:
Beginning at the most Southerly corner of said Parcel Map No. 21383, thence Northerly,
Easterly, Southerly and Easterly along the boundary of said Parcel Map No. 21383, the
following eight (8) courses;
North 39048'32" West, a distance of 2333.93 feet;
Thence North 38050'27" East, a distance of 1532.84 feet;
Thence South 19o50'46" East, a distance of 798.73 feet to the beginning of a curve
concave Northeasterly and having a radius of 850.00 feet; ~--
Thence Southeasterly along said curve through a central angle of 4 °39'03", an arc length
of 69.00 feet;
Thence North 65°30'11" East a distance of 259.85 feet to the beginning of a curve
concave Southerly and having a radius of 500.00 feet;
Thence Easterly along said curve through a central angle of 12° 16'14", an arc length of
107.08 feet;
Thence North 77=46'25'' East a distance of 651.63 feet to the beginning of a curve
concave Northwesterly and having a radius of 800.00 feet;
Thence Northeasterly along said curve through a central angle of 28039'45" an arc
length of 400.20 feet;
Thence North 49006'40" East a distance of 479.23 feet; the preceding seven (7) courses
being also along the centerline of Winchester Road and Avenida De Ventas per said Parcel Map
No. 21383;
Thence South 40052'20'` East a distance of 39.00 feet to the Southerly right-of-way of
said Avenida De Ventas, also being the most Northeasterly corner of said adjusted Parcel C per
said Lot Line Adjustment No. 21;
Thence South 55029'52" East along the Eastedy line of said Parcel C, a distance of
322.72 feet to the Southeasterly corner of said Parcel C;
Page 2 of 2
Thence South 47°39'11" West along the Southerly line of said Parcels C, B and A of said
Lot Line Adjustment No. 21, and the Southerly line of said Parcels 122 and 1 23, a distance of
666.16 feet to an angle point on the Southerly line of said Parcel 123;
Thence South 65005'20" West along the Southerly line of Parcels 123 and 124, a
distance of 162.12 feet to the Northeasterly corner of said Parcel 88;
Thence South 25°39'49'' East along the Easterly line of said Parcel 88, and its
prolongation, a distance of 462.83 feet to a point on the Southerly right-of-way of said
Winchester Road, said point being on a curve concave Northwesterly and having a radius of
900.00 feet; a radial line to said point bears South 25039'49" East'
Thence Southeasterly along said curve through a central angle of 8 o 17'45" an arc length
of 130.31 feet; to the Northwest corner o.f Parcel 19 per said Parcel Map No. 21383; a radial to
said point bears 17022'04" East;
Thence South 17027'53'' East along the Westerly line of said Parcel 19, a distance of
130.76 feet, to an angle point on the Westerly line of said Parcel 19;
Thence South 44°37'33'' East along the Westerly line of said Parcel 19 and Parcel 18 per
said Parcel Map No. 21383, a distance of 293.60 feet to the Southwest corner of said Parcel
..---18 and the Southeasterly boundary of said Parcel Map No. 21383;
Thence South 45 o 22'27" West along said Southeasterly boundary a distance of 201 2.73
feet to the Point of Beginning.
Chri g
PLS 6588 Exp. 12-31-95 .~
.~/~,L LAA/~
N0. 6588
7-95 TUE
10:12 AM MBS/LOWRY TE~ECULA FAX MO. 909 676 7976 P. 2
ID(HIBIT 'B'
R93..007.00~
PARCELS I THROUGH 19, INCLUSIVE, 89 THROUGH 9,5, INCLUSIVE, AND 101
THROUGH 112, INOLUSIVE, OF PARCEL MAP NO. 21383, IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
COUNTY OF RNERSIDE. STATE OF OALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FIL~ IN BOOK 167,
PAGES 18 THROUGH 25, INCLUSIVE, OF PARCEL MAPS, RECORDS OF SAID RIVERSIDE
COUNTY'.
EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT POFri"ION LYING WITHIN PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP
NO. 27336 AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN 9OOK 178, PAGES 8S AND 86 OF PARCEL MAPS,
RECORDS OF SAID RIVERSIDE COUNTY.
.)
r- rO. zzI~ ~o:
' WINCHESTER BUSINESS PARK
~ .. TEHECUSA TR~2138a
ESCONDIDO, CA 92046-0160 PUNCH LIST PER CONTRACT
~"' ~ .... ~" ' 5" ":"': .....
-- -;.,. ..:... . . . ..
DE~DY ·
42181 AVENIDA ALVAPukDO . "
TEME~ OA 92590 l'age 1
GENERAL ,F_N.I31NEEFUNG CONTI~CTORS UC #432712
~oe) .7.e-455o · FAX {m3e) eTe-2~3e ....
..GOLD YO:
INV.DATE. SHIPPED VIA FOB TN~M,q
~.2/22/.9.4 0 Net 30' Days
F. O.N~-::' P.O,DATE SALESMAN
CONTaACT.,., '-'.'] .' ·" 12/O?/94 ' .
· -....:. · [ ·
--;~_'-' .'-:.-7:"' ' ~ '
~22~'00. ".K~g 6" c~ & GUTteR
2 6 3::$o o: -' ~. ~. S~OT ~
~3'S'~ s~:'" ~' e;s. ~s ~.
00: ': ~RI~' PLO~ ~INg8
220,00.. R&R A. C, ' ONhY S~.
60.00 SKZN- FATCH ....
1.00 CLEA~. ~ VIDEO STO~ DRAIN WZ~CH. ONLY
6.00 PO~:~- ~ PA~CH C~I~PED CURa
6.100. ~:.~ED KILL JOINTS
32~.00 · R&R GU~ERS & SPANDRE~S AS ~EP 6~' 8F
1.0O 'I~STALL STD 303 D~IN LOT 19
le, .,o ',. ~:STann VE~ DZTC~
-' Tz= ...
5hipptn~
Tot&~
·-...-...:,. ._.~ -.
;,'::_; -::..::1
! ~:~-8 0 "' ' ' "'
· ·
' 63 .'00 : '
8 " ',
2;63
3., 50 °5,:~9.0', OOF
22687'.50
52 ;,.50 Z.O0
21R.oo **
4:.,:20 ~:,~'6~5'.0
16:.90' *:
· * ..,..!. ~: · . ..~
ITEM 12
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY ATTORNEY
CfTY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Gary Thornhill, Director of Plannin?
March 28, 1995
Planning Application No. PA94-0120 and PA94-0121
Prepared By:
Craig D. Ruiz, Assistant Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
APPROVE the Partial Termination of Development Agreement No.
90-1 and authorize the Mayor to Execute the Agreement.
BACKGROUND
On July 10, 1990, the City Council approved Tentative Parcel Map 21383. In approving the
map, the Council conditioned the project to enter into a development agreement at a later date
(See Attachment No. 2). This particular development agreement is not a typical agreement
in comparison the agreements adopted by the Council in recent years. The sole purpose of
this agreement was to allow the Council to approve the map at the July 1990 meeting while
allowing staff the ability to place additional conditions of approval on the project at a later date
through the development agreement. The Council approved Development Agreement No. 90-1
(DA90-1) on August 28, 1990 (See Attachment No. 3).
On January 12, 1995, the Planning Director approved Planning Application Nos. PA94-0120
(Tentative Parcel Map No. 28084) and PA94-0121 (Reversion to Acreage). These two
applications allow the applicant to re-map the westerly portion of Parcel Map 21383 and to
allow for a Reversion to Acreage for this same area. The approval of Parcel Map 28084
requires, as stated in Section 3.3 of DA90-1, that the development agreement be amended
to reflect the new map. Thus, the project was conditioned to amend the agreement. In
addition, to insure that the conditions of approval that were placed upon the original project,
through the development agreement, were also incorporated within the new project, the
conditions from the development agreement were placed upon Parcel Map 28084.
To comply with the condition to amend DA90-1, the applicant has elected to remove the area
within Parcel Map No. 28084 from DA90-1. Because the relevant conditions from DA90-1
have been applied to Parcel Map 28084, the intent of the Council in approving Parcel Map
21383 still remains. Therefore, the development agreement no longer necessary. In addition,
it is the opinion of the Assistant City Attorney that the termination agreement does satisfy the
requirement to amend the Development Agreement.
FISCAL IMPACT
None.
R:\STAFFRPT\120PA94.CC 3120/95 ktb 1
Attachments:
Partial Termination of Development Agreement No. 90-1 - Page 3
City Council Minutes, July 10, 1990- Page 4
City Council Minutes, August 28, 1990 - Page 5
R:\STAFFRPT\120PAg/,.CC 3/20/95 ktb 2
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
PARTIAL TERMINATION OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
R:\STAFFRPT\120PAg~.CC 3/20/95 ktb 3
RECORDED AT RF.Q~ OF
AND WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO:
June Greek, City Clerk
C1TY OF TEM~CULA
43174 Business Park Drive
Temeeula, California 92.~90
~ FROM RECORDER'S FEES
pursuant to Government Code
Section 6103 and 27383
PARTIAL TERMINATION
OF
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 90-1
This PARTIAL TERMINATION OF DEVELOPMENT AGP, EI~IENT NO. 9(}-1 (this
"Partial Termination") is entered into effective on the date it is recorded with the Riverside
County Recorder, hereinafter referred to as the "Effective Date," by and between the City of
Temecula, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City" and BA Properties, Inc.,
a Delaware Corporation hereinafter referred to as "Owner.~ In considention of the mutual
promises and covenants contained herein, the parties hereto mutually agree as follows:
REC1TALS
SECTION 1. RECITALS. This Partial Termination is made and entered into with
respect to the following facts, which are acknowledged as true and correct by the parties hereto:
a. Effective October 19, 1990, City and Owner's predecessOr-in-interest,
Rancho Core Associates No. 1, a California limited parmership, entered into that certain
Development Agreement No. 90-1 (the "Agreement"). Unless otherwise deftned, the capitalized
terms used herein shall have the same meanings as set forth in the Agreement.
b. The Agreement defines Existing Development Approvals as Tentative
Parcel Map No. 21383. Since the date of the Agreement, Final Parcel Map No. 21383 was
recorded in the Official Records of Riverside County.
c. Owner is now processing Final Parcel Map No. 28084 over that portion
of the Property described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto (legal description) and shown in Exhibit
"B" attached hereto (Plat Map) (the "Affected Property"). Parcel Map No. 28084 is a one lot
parcel map, and contemplates the vacation of all streets with its boundaries previously dedicated
on Parcel Map No. 21383.
d. Owner and City now desires to terminate the Agreement With respect to
the Affected Property on the terms and conditions set forth below.
OPERATIVE PROVISIONS
SECTION 2. PARTIAl, TERMINATION. The Agreement is hereby terminated with
respect to the Affected Property, including, without limitation the benefits and burdens imposed
--on Owner with respect to the Affected Property as more specifically set forth in Section 4.2.1
of the Agreement.
SECTION 3. OPEN SPACE. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the area shown on Exhibit
"B" attached herew and incorporated herein by ~is reference and formerly known as lots 66
through 73 of Parcel Map No. 21383 shall remain as open space as required by the Agreement.
SECTION 4. ~G EFFECTIVENESS. Except as modified pursuant to this
Partial Termination, the terms and provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and
effect.
SECTION 5. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Partial Termination shall only become
effective upon recordation of Final Parcel Map No. 28084.
IN WITNESS WH~,EOF, the parties herew have executed this Partial Termination as
of the day and year set forth below.
OWNER
BA PROPERTIES, INC.,
a Delaware Corporation
Dated:
CITY OF ~CULA
--Dated:
Jeff Stone, Mayor
ATTEST:
June Greek, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter Thorson, City Attorney
(westsid~jat2)
ALL-PIHtPOSE ACKNO~EMENT
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
On , before me, , Notary
Public, personally appeared , personally known to me (or
proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are
subscribed to the within instrument and a~knowledged to mc that he/she/they executed the
same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the
instnunent the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the
instnunent.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
SIGNATURE OF NOTARY
0
0
1NDNmUAL(S)
OFFICER(S) CrrrLE[s]):
CAPACITY CLAIMED
BY SIGNER
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
PARTNER(S)
ATTORNEY-IN-FACT
TRUSTEE(S)
SUBSCRIBING WITNESS
GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR
CHAIRPERSON/MAYOR
OTHER:
SIGNER IS REPRESENTING:
AC]rNOW~ ,~rr'K~,~
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF Los ~nueles)
On March 17. 1995 before me, Philomena A. Serrao a
Notary Public in and for the State of California, personally
appeared Sandy Cas-idy and Sandy Throop personally known to me
(or proved to me.on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the
persons whose n8mes are subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that they executed the same in their
authorized capacities, and that by their signatures on the
instrument the persons, or the entity upon behalf of which the
person[s] acted, executed the instrument.
WITNESS my b~nd and official seal.
( Signature )
J~ PHILOMENA k ~ER~AO
(Space above for official
notaria1 seal)
Page 1 o~' 2
EXHIBIT "A'
Parcels 20 through 46, inclusive; 48 through 71, inclusive; 76 through' 88, inclusive; 122
through 130 inclusive; all of Parcel Map No. 21383, as shown by Parcel Map on file in Book 167
Pages 18 through 25, inclusive, of Parcel Maps, Records of Riverside County, California;
together with Parcel 47; Parcels 72 through 75, inclusive of said Parcel Map adjusted as Parcels
A through E as shown by Lot Une Adjustment No. 20 recorded August 7, ,1992 as instrument
No. 293333 of Official Records oi' Riverside County, California; together with that portion of
Parcel 119, Parcels 120 and 1 21 of said Parcel Map adjusted as Parcels A through G as shown
by Lot Une Adjustment No. 21 recorded November 20, 1991 as instrument No. 40458 of Official
Records of Riverside County, California, more particularly described as follows:
Beginning at the most Southerly corner of said Parcel Map No. 21383, thence Northerly,
Easterly, Southerly and Easterly along the boundary ol' said Parcel Map No. 21383..the
following eight-(8) courses;
North 39048'32" West, a distance of 2333.93 feet;
Thence North 38'~50'27'' East, a distance of 1532.84 feet;
Thence South 19"50'46" East, a distance of 798.73 feet to the beginning of a curve
concave Northeasterly and having a radius of 850.00 feet;
~,~-'--,,
Thence Southeasterly along said curve through a central angle of 4'"39'03", an arc length
of 69.00 feet;
Thence North 65'"30'11" East a distance of 259.85 feet to the beginning of a curve
concave Southerly and having a radius of 500.00 feet;
Thence Easterly along said curve through a central angle of 12° 16'14% an arc length of
107.08 feet;
'Thence 'North 77°46'25" East a distance of 651.63 feet to the beginning of a curve
concave Northwesterly and having a radius of 800.00 feet;
Thence Northeasterly aJong said curve through a central angle of 28'"39'45" an arc
length of 400.20 feet;
Thence North 49'"06'40" East a distance of 479.23 feet; the preceding seven (7) courses
being also along the centerline of Winchester Road and Avonida De Ventas per said Parcel Map
No. 21383;
Thence South 40'"52'20" East a distance of 39 00 feet to the Southerly right-of-waY of
said Avertida De Ventas, also being the re?st NortheastL~dY comer of said adjusted Parcel C per
said Lot Une Adjustment No. 21;
Thence South 55'"29'52" East along the Easterly line of said Parcel C, a distance of
322.72 feet to the Southeasterly corner of said Parcel C;
Page 2 of 2
Thence South 47°39'11" West along the Southerly line of sad Parcels C, B and A Of said '~,.
Lot Une Adjustment No. 21, and the Southerly line of said Pazcels 122 and 123, a distance of
666.16 feet to an angle point on the Southerly line of said Parcel 123;
Thence South 65°05'20" West along the Southerly line of Parcels 123 and 124, a
distance of 162.12 feet to the Northeasterly corner of said Parcel 88;
:
Thence South 25"39'49" East along the Easterly line of said Parcel 88, and its
prolongation, a distance of 462.83 feet to a point on the Southerly right-of-way of said
Winchester Road, said point being on a curve concave Northwesterly and having a radius of
900.00 feet; a radial line to said point bears South 25039'49" East'
Thence Southeas'teily along said curve through a central angle of 8" 17'45" an arc length
of 130.31 feet; to the Northwest corner o.f Parcel 19 per said Parcel Map No. 21383; a radial to
said point bears 17~22'04'' East;
Thence South 17027'53" East along the WeSterly-line of said Parcel 19, a distance of
130.76 feet, to an angle point on the Westerly line of said Parcel 19;
Thence South 44~37'33" East along the Westerly line of said Parcel 19 and Parcel 18 per
said Parcel Map No. 21383, a distance of 293.60 feet to the Southwest corner of said Parcel
18 and the Southeasterly boundary of said Parcel Map No. 21383;
Thence South 45o22'27" West along said Southeasterly boundary a distance of 201 2:7,'
feet to the Point of Beginning.
PLS 6588 Exp. 12-31-95 c~::~
N0. 6588
~2-20-95 lION 2:11 PH tlBS/LOWRY TEIIECULA PAX NO. ~09 676 7~76 P. 4
, //'
~ c~~'P~ ~~ ~ ~' ..... ~ 9
z - 6z ~5 / ~ ~ ' 8 I 9o I m ! sz I ' --
~ 56
oF c k~ ~
el. ~ 12-31~~ x. ~;; g !:~ ...... .. /
;, , ,: · .,
_~ ", ..:
C~lS ~. BE 6588 EXP* ~-95""'
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES, JULY 10, 1990
R:\STAFFRPT\120PA~.CC 3/20/~5 kLb
4
,/-- C~tv Council M~nutes
July ~0.1990
Mayor Parks opened the public hearing at 7:40 PM.
Mayor Parks asked if it is a procedural matter that a public
hearing be held on this issue. Mr. Smith stated this is the
case and property owners involved have been notified of the
public hearing. ~
Having no requests to speak, Mayor Parks closed .the public
hearing at 7:41 PM.
Councilmember Birdsall moved, Councilmember Moore seconded a
motion to direct staff to proceed with abatement procedures
pursuant to the provisions adopted in Resolution 90-55.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans,
Moore, Mu~oz, Parks
NOES: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCIIAMEMBERS: None
COUNCIL BUSINESS
11.
Second Extension of Time - Tentative Parcel MaD 21383
Gary Thornhill, Principal Planner, stated this is a request
for a second extension of time on Tentative Parcel Map 21383.
He said this item came before the Council on June 26, 1990,
and discussions were held regarding the amount of proposed
grading for this site. The intention of staff was to resolve
these concerns and come back to the Council with a receive and
file recommendation, however the problems have not been
resolved and the recommendation of staff is to set this item
for public hearing on July 24, 1990.
Mayor Parks stated the applicant has requested that the
Council approve this issue tonight and submitted a letter to
the Council offering to enter into a development agreement
with the City addressing the concerns of the Planning
Department.
Mr. Thornhill said he felt this is not the best method-to
handle this situation,,stating staff may be able to simply
condition the map.
Mayor Parks said the map was approved by the County on March
24, '1987, and he understands the developer is experiencing a
M~ nute~\l \9\90 -5- 07/18/90
C tv Council M~nutes
July 10. 1990
hardship due. to the length of time it has taken to process
this project.
City Attorney Fields recommended the best way to handle this
issue is to set for public hearing so all the issues can be
addressed and at that time, if the Council Zaels it is
appropriate, the extension of time could be conditioned. He
said his concern with approvingthe extension tonight would be
the exclusion of other interested third parties.
Councilmember Moore said it is her understanding that public
hearings have been held on this issue by the County. City
Attorney Fields stated hearings have been held, but only on
the original map.
Councilmember BirdCall said the developer is agreeing to the
conditions the Council has asked for, and she does not feel
there is a need for another pubic hearing.
Councilmember Lindemans objected to the grading .planned for
this project, requesting that the City take a stand on the
amount of excavation, permitted on the hillsides. He asked
about phasing maps and who would be responsible for
landscaping.
Councilmember Moore moved, Councilmember Birdsall seconded a
motion to approve a second extension of time and require the
owner to enter into a development agreement as set forth in a
letter dated July 5, 1990.
Councilmember Mufioz asked that the matter be set for-public
hearing as recommended by staff.
Councilmember Lindemans requested referring this to the
Planning Commission for public hearing. He said the City
needs a master plan before damage done by projects such as
this is irreversible.
Gary Thornhill reported that in the event the Council wishes
approve this second extension of time, further conditions have
been suggested by staff. He said the conditions outlined in
the letter from the developer were tightened, and the
developer is in agreement withthe modifications- He provided
the Council with an additional staff report outlining the
suggested changes.
Mayor Parks stated that the developer has agreed to be
responsive to the City's conditions and stated that further
delay of this project, causes a great hardship on the
MirlutL~\l\9\gQ -6- 07/18/90
~- C~tv Council Minutes
July 10, 1990
developer- He stressed this project, with the agreed
conditions, is in the best interest of the citizens of
Temecula-
Councilmember Lindemans questioned who would be responsible
for landscaping of this project- Mayor Parks answered that
before a grading permit is granted, bonding mus~be done for
landscaping-
.City Manager Dixon stated the issue tonight is a second
extension of time, not a final approval- He said the Planning
Department would have time to review the conditions proposed
and make changes if necessarY- The final approval will still
come before the Council.
Councilmember ~Ufioz stated if staff recommends a public
hearing, he believes this is the best course of action.
The motion was amended by Councilmember Moore, and the second
by Councilmember Birdsall as follows: Approve second
extension of time on Tentative Parcel Map 21383, =require the
developer to enter into an agreement incorporating the
standards and conditions set forth in the supplemental staff
report, and direct staff to submit this developers agreement
to the City Council concurrent with the final map.
The motion was carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: 3
NOES: 2
ABSENT: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Moore, Parks
Lindemans, Mufioz
None
RECESS
Mayor Parks called a recess at 8:20 PM. The meeting was
reconvened, following the CSD meeting at 9:00 PM.
12.' Tract 23304 (Club Valencia) ' Final MaD Traffic Study
Doug Stewart Deputy City Engineer, reported this subdivision
was originally approved by the County of-Riverside Board of
Directors on May 10 · 1988. -The project has recently been
extended 60 days a~iting City approval- The 60 days runs
out tonight- He 'explained this tract was originally approved
as a condominiumproject, and has been changed to an apartment
complex-
07/18190
'7-
nut es\l \9\90
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES, AUGUST 28, 1990
R:\STAFFRPT\120PAg~.CC 3/201~5 ktb 5
City Council Minutes Aug~st ~8. 19~)0
28. nevelooment A~reement for Tentative Parcel M~p No..~1383 - Rancho Core
Associates No.. I
Mayor Parks opened the public hearing at 12:10 AM.
Gary Thornhill reported this item was before the City Council on July 1 O, 1990
as a receive and file item. At that time staff recommended additional
conditions of approval be added to the project. The determination was made
that a development agreement would be the appropriate vehicle for
incorporating those conditions of approval. In response to that, a development
agreement, and ordinance have been prepared.
He reported this developpent agreement implements the conditions of approval
that were recommended to the Council on July 10, 1990 with the exception
of Condition D, which would present legal problems. In lieu of this condition
the applicant offered to give the City two additional open space lots. Staff
recommends:
28.1 Adopt a Negative Declaration for tentative Parcel Map NO. 21383. :
28.2 Read by title only and introduce an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 90-16
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECUL~.
APPROVING DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 90-1
28.3. Authorize the Mayor to execute the development agreement between the
City of Temecula and Rancho Core Associates No. 1.
Councilmember Lindemans asked why this project is not multiple phased. He
said this project with 130 lots, should take 10 to 15 years to build out. He
requested that it be phased.
Gary Thornhill said his understanding is the developer is proposing to phase the
project. He said he has a phasing plan that has been made available to staff.
Counciimember Lindemans asked staff if a Community Services District for the
plan is feasible and whether the City should own and maintain the park' at this
location.
'Ninutt, s\8"~,8\fO -21- Qe111/'gO
Citv Council Minutes
Aug-st ~8. 1990
City Manager Dixon stated that we can have a sub-zone in the CSD where
specific types of landscaping can be addressed. He said regarding the park, the
City should own and maintain the park.
Councilmember Lindemans requested adding these items to the.agreement.
Dean Allen, 29377 Rancho California Road, Suite 202, stated this project was
purchased in 1977, and in 1987 the plans were approved. He showed the
Council a drawing illustrating this project. He said the conditions agreed upon
give eight lots as open space to the City, provide another lot for access for a
road, and provide a park lot in the center of the project. He said the park will
consist of approximately nine acres when completed.
He advised there is a p'~asing plan, which he presented to Council.
In response to the second question regarding the maintenance of the park and
hillside, it is currently the applicants proposal to maintain them as a property'
owners association in a very high quality manner. He said it is possible for the
owners to maintain it originally, and possibly dedicate the maintenance to the
CSD at a later point.
Bill Johnson, 29377 Rancho California Road, Suite 202, thanked Council and
staff for their work on this project. He discussed the environmental sensitivity
of the project, the quality of the project and the economic impact on the City.
He said the linear parkway is intended to be used as a public facility. He stated
he would welcome a discussion with CSD regarding maintenance, however a
very high standard of maintenance is desired, and the money needed to do this
would be provided by the property owners. Jogging and biking paths are also
being looked at for this project. He said this project will be committed to bring
jobs to Temecula.
Mayor Parks closed the public hearing at 12:29 AM.
ninutes%8'%28%.fO -Zf- ~11
City Council Minutes Auqust ~8. 1990
Councilmember Moore moved, Councilmember Mu~oz seconded a motion to
adopt a negative declaration for tentative Parcel Map No. 21383.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore,
Mu~oz, Parks
NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
It was moved by Councilmember Lindemans, seconded by Counciimember
Moore to read by title c;nly and introduce an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 90-16
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPRO VING DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 90- I *'
with the addition of placing the construction phasing map in the Development
Agreement as Exhibit "F".
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore,
Mu~oz, Parks
NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
09/~/90
'Ninutes\8%28\90 -30- '
City Council Minutes
Augt ,st ~8. 1990
Councilmember Lindemans moved, Councilmember Birdsall seconded a motion
to authorize the Mayor to execute the development agreement between the
City of Temecula and Rancho Core Associates No. 1.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore,
Mu~oz, Parks
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
It was moved by Councilmember Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember Birdsall to
extend the meeting to 1:00 AM. The motion was unanimously carried.
29.
Tentative Tract Man No. 23513
Mayor Parks opened the public hearing at 12:35 AM.
Gary Thornhill stated this is a request to subdivide 14.37 acres into 11 lots.
He said this project was reviewed by the City staff and brought before Council
on June 26, 1990. At that meeting the staff recommended the item be set for
public hearing. The grading concerns have been satisfied as well as the
compatibility with surrounding projects. Projects to the North are 1/2 acre lots,
which is consistent with this development. Staff recommends approval of this
project.
Counciimember Mu~oz asked how significant 27 feet of grading is. Gary
Thornhill stated staff does not feel it is significant. He said they are basically
creating building pads.
Councilmember Lindemans asked if this project was noticed more than 300 feet
as requested by Council on June 26, 1990. Mr. Thornhill stated he would need
TO check the case file.
Tod Thomas, 41934 Main ;Street, stated he had letters in support of this
project that are from property'owners over 1,000 feet from the site. ' '
Mayor Parks closed the public .hearing at 12:50 AM.
tl t ruates\8~,l\f(I -31 - 09111/90
RECORDED AT REQ~ OF
AND WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO:
June Greek, City Clerk
CITY OF TEMECULA
43174 Bn~Im~ Park Drive
Temecula, California 92~90
EXEMPT FROM RECORDER'S FEES
pursuant to Government Code
Section 6103 and 27383
PARTIAL TERMINATION
OF
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 90-1
This PARTIAL TERMINATION OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 90-1 (this
"Partial Termination") is entered into effective on the date it is recorded with the Riverside
County Recorder, hereinafter referred to as the "Effective Date," by and between the City of
Temecula, a municipal corporation, bereinafter referred to as "City" and BA Properties, Inc.,
a Delaware Corporation hereinafter referred to as "Owner." In consideration of the mutual
promises and covenants contained herein, the parties hereto mutually agree as follows:
RECITALS
SECTION 1. RECITALS. This Pmial Termination is made and entered into with
respect to the following facts, which are acknowledged as true and correct by the parties hereto:
a. Effective October 19, 1990, City and Owner's predecessor-in-~,
Rancho Core Associates No. 1, a California limited partnership, entered into that certain
Development Agreement No. 90-1 (the ' Agreement"). Unless otherwise defined, the capitalized
terms used herein shall have the same meanings as set forth in the Agreement.
b. The Agreemere defines Existing Development Approvals as Tentative
Parcel Map No. 21383. Since the date of the Agreement, Final Parcel Map No. 21383 was
recorded in the Official Records of Riverside County.
c. Owner is now processing Final Parcel Map No. 28084 over that portion
of the Property described in Exhibit ' A ~ attached hereto (legal description) and shown in Exhibit
'B' attached hereto (Plat Map) (the ~ Affected Property*). Parcel Map No. 28084 is a one lot
parcel map, and contemplates the vacation of all streets with its boundaries previously dedicated
on Parcel Map No. 21383.
d. Owner and City now desires to termiuate t~ Agreement with respect to
the Affected Property on the mrms and conditions set forth below.
OPERATIVE PROVISIONS
SECTION 2, PARTIAl. TERMINATION. The Agreement is hereby terminated with
respect to the Affected Property, including, without limitation the benefits and burdem impo, sed
on Owner with respect to the Affected l~Dpcaty as more specifically set forth in Section 4.2.1
of the Agreement.
SECTION 3. OPgN SPACE. Notwithstnnding the foregoing, the area shown on Exhibit
"B" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and formerly known as lots 66
through 73 of Parcel Map No. 21383 shah remain as open space as required by the Agreement.
SECTION 4. RElVLA~G EFFR~~g. Except as modified pursuant to this
Partial Termination, the terms and provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and
effect.
SECTION S. EFFECTIVE DATE-, This Partial Termination shall only become
effective upon recordation of Final Parcel Map No. 28084.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Partial Termination as
of the day and year set forth below.
OWNER
BA PROPERTIES, INC.,
a Delaware Corporation
Dated:
CITY
CITY OF TEMECImA
Jeff Stone, Mayor
ATTEST:
June Greek, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter Thorson, City Attorney
(wesmide~anisl2)
ALL-~SE ACKNOWLRrICvEM!~NT
STATE OF CAI-H~ORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
On , before me, , Notary
Public, personally appeared , personally known to me (or
proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are
subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the
same in Ms/he/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the
instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the
instntment.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
SIGNATURE OF NOTARY
D
D
m'D~UAL(S)
OFFiCER(S) (TrrLE[S]):
CAPACITY CLAIMED
BY SIGNER
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
PARTNER(S)
ATTORNEY-IN-FACT
TRUSTF-F*(S)
SUBSCRIBING WITNESS
GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR
CHAIRPERSON/MAYOR
OTHER:
SIGNER IS REPRESENTING:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF r.os ~ngel e~)
On March 17. !995 before me, Phi!omaha A. Serrao a
Notary Public in and for the State of California, personally
appeared Sandy Cassidy and Sandy Throop personally known to me
(or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the
persons whose names are subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that they executed the same in their
authorized capacities, and that by their signatures on the
instrument the persons, or the entity upon behalf of which the
person[s] acted, executed the instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
(Signature)
PHILOMENA A. ~ERRAO
COMM. · 1032470
Public -- Califomio
(Space above for official
notarial seal)
Page 1 of 2
EXHIBIT "A"
Parcels 20 through 46, inclusive; 48 through 71, inclusive; 76 through 88. inclusive; 122
through 130 inclusive; all of Parcel Map No. 21383. as shown by Parcel Map on file in Book 167
Pages 18 through 25. inclusive, of Parcel Maps. Records of Riverside County, California;
together with Parcel 47; Parcels 72 through 75, inclusive of said Parcel Map adjusted as Parcels
A through E as shown by Lot Line Adjustment No. 20 recorded August 7, 1992 as instrumer~t
No. 293333 of Official Records of Riverside County, California; together with that portion of
Parcel 119, Parcels 120 and 1 21 of said Parcel Map adjusted as Parcels A through C as shown
by Lot Une Adjustment No. 21 recorded November 20, 1991 as instrument No. 40458 of Official
Records of Riverside County. California, more particularly described as follows:
Beginning at the most Southerly corner of said Parcel Map No. 21383, thence Northerly.
Easterly, Southerly and Easterly along the boundary of said Parcel Map No. 21383. :the
following eight-(8) courses;
North 39°48'32" West, a distance of 2333.93 feet;
Thence North 38050'27'' East, a distance of 1532.84 feet;
Thence South 19°50'46'' East, a distance of 798.73 feet to the beginning of a =curve
concave Northeasterly and having a radius of 850.00 feet;
Thence Southeasterly along said curve through a central angle of 4°39'03", an arc lengtl
of 69.00 feet;
Thence North 65°30'11'' East a distance of 259.85 feet to the beginning of a curve
concave Southerly and having a radius of 500.00 feet;
Thence Easterly along said curve through a central angle of 12° 16'14", an arc length of
107.08 feet;
Thence North 77046'25" East a distance of 651.63 feet to the beginning of a curve
concave Northwesterly and having a radius of 800.00 feet;
Thence Northeasterly along said curve through a central angle of 28=39'45" an arc
length of 400.20 feet;
Thence North 49 '~06'40" East a distance of 479.23 feet; the preceding seven (7) courses...
being also along the centerline of Winchester Road and Avenida De Ventas per said Parcel Map
No. 21383;
Thence South 40 ° 52'20" East a distance of 39.00 feet to the Southerly right-of-way of
said Avenida De Ventas, also being the most Northeasterly corner of said adjusted Parcel C per
said Lot Line Adjustment No. 21; ~
Thence South 55'~29'52" East along the Eastedy line of said Parcel C, a distance
322.72 feet to the Southeasterly corner of said Parcel C;
Page 2 of 2
Thence South 47°39'11" West along the Southerly line of said Parcels C, B and A of said
Lot Une Adiustment No. 21, and the Southerly line of said Parcels122 and 1 23, a distance of
666.16 feet to an angle point on the Southerly line of said Parcel 123;
Thence South 65005'20" West along the Southerly line of Parcels 123 and 124, a
distance of 162.12 feet to the Northeasterly corner of said Parcel 88; :
Thence South 25°39'49'' East along the Easterly line of said Parcel 88, and its
prolongation, a distance of 462.83 feet to a point on the Southerly right-of-way of said
Winchester Road, said point being on a curve concave Northwesterly and having a radius of
900.00 feet; 'a radial line to said point bears South 25°39'49" East'
Thence Southeasterly along said curve through a central angle of 8 ° 17'45" an arc length
of 130.31 feet; to the Northwest corner qf Parcel 19 per said Parcel Map No. 21383; a radiar to
said point bears 17°22'04'' East;
Thence South 17°27'53" East along the Westerly.line of said Parcel 19, a distance of
130.76 feet, to an angle point on the Westerly line of said Parcel 19;
The~nce South 44°37'33" East along the Westerly line of said Parcel 19 and Parcel 18 per
said Parcel Map No. 21383, a distance of 293.60 feet to the Southwest corner of said Parcel
18 and the Southeasterly boundary of said Parcel Map No. 21383;
Thence South 45 °22'27" West along said Southeasterly boundary a distance of 20'~ 2:73
feet to the Point of Beginning.
PLS 6588 Exp. 12-31-95 ~
-
N0. 6588
gAI-20-95 MOlt 2:11 Pli IiBS/LOfiY TKi~CULA ;AI !tO. 909 676 7976 P. 4
ITEM 13
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY MANAGER~
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
March 28, 1995
Acceptance of Public Streets into the' City Maintained-Street System
(Within Tract No. 21760)
PREPARED BY: O~t/~lbert
RECOMMENDATION:
K. Crisp, Permit Engineer.
That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 95---
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC
STREETS INTO THE CITY MAINTAINED-STREET SYSTEM
(WITHIN TRACT NO. 21760)
BACKGROUND:
The City Council received and filed Tract No. 21760, on June 13, 1990, and entered into
subdivision agreements for the improvement of streets and drainage, and sewer and water
systems, with:
Rancho Highlands Venture I
The developer, Rancho Highlands Venture I, and successor-in-interest, WRI Rancho Highlands
Venture, a California Limited Partnership, have improved to City standards the public
improvements in accord with the subdivision agreements. The Public Works Department has
recommended acceptance of the subject improvements and initiation of the one-year warranty
period. A Faithful Performance warranty bond has been posted.
On March 28, 1995 the City Council accepted the improvements and a Faithful Performance
Warranty bond, and initiated the one-year warranty period.
Under provisions of the Streets and Highways Code (Section 1806), public streets offered by
the subdivider must be accepted by City Council resolution in order to be included in the
public-street maintained system.
agdtpt~95~O328~tr21760.row 0315951dn:
The streets so affected are Calla Nacido, Corte Rialto, Via Fanita, Corte Copa, Via Mendo, and
portions of Preece Lane, Tierre Vista Road, and Corte Fresca.
Inasmuch as certain state funds are earmarked for maintenance of these publicly-maintained
streets, the process will make these streets eligible for those funds.
FISCAL IMPACT:
These streets will be integrated into the City's Pavement Management System and will receive
periodic surface and/or structural maintenance efforts. The new pavement condition of these
streets should necessitate only limited surface or structural treatments for 7 to 10 years.
ATTACHMENTS:
Resolution No. 95-
with Exhibits "A-B", inclusive.
cc: Brad Buron, Maintenance Superintendent
aldrptWS~O32~'21760.mw 031,W~ldmc
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE C1TY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEIVIECULA, CP-LIFORNIA, ACCl;I'IING CERTAIN
S's~t~s:xS INTO THE CITY-MAINTAINED STI~EET
SYSTEM (Wn'H sN TRACT NO. 21760)
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ~ DOES RESOLVE, DErHR_M]NE
AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
WHEREA, S, Rancho Highlands Venture I offered for dedication to the City of Temecula
certain streets within Tract No. 21760 for public street and public utility purposes, and said City
of Temec~!~ accepted said often of dedication by City Council action on .June 12, 1990.
WBER~.&S, the City desires to accept into the City-maintained street system the public
impwvements within all or portions of the public streets offered and accepted by the City of
Temecula as depicted in Exhibit *B*;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Temecuh
as follows:
Section 1. That the City of Temecula accept into the City Maintained-Street System
those streets or portions of public streets offered and accepted by the City Council described in
Exhibits 'A" and 'B* attached hereto.
Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution and accept the
streets and portions thereof, offered to and accepted by the City Council, into the City-
Maintained-Street System as described in Exhibits *A* and *B* attached hereto.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula
at a regular meeting held on the 28th day of March, 1995.
Jeffrey Stone, Mayor
a$~lrVt~$M~2~M/21760.mw O~l$~$1akc
June S. Greek
City Clerk
STATE OF CAI-I!~ORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMBCULA )
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify thsI
Resolution No. 95- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of"
Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 28th day of March, 1995, by the following
vote:
AYES: 0
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 0
ABSTAIN: 0
COUNCrt-~MBERS:
COUNCILMPMBERS:
COUNCH~MP-MBERS:
COUNTERS:
agd~95~328~r21760.mw 011S9'jlak~
F,x, Hrarr 'A' TO ~LUTION NO. 95-
Accep~na the public streets offered to and
accepted for Public Road and Public Ut~ity
Purposes by the City of T~!m as Ind|csted on
Tract No. 21760, and accepting subject public
streets into the CRy ]V[a|ntn|ned-~treet Systeul as
described below:
Those lots described as Lots *A" through wI" inclusive,
as shown on Tract No. 21760, f'ded 21 June 1990, in
Book 219 of Maps, Pgs 54-63 Ind., further described as follows:
(Lot
(Lot "B")
(Lot "C")
(Lot "D")
(Lot "E")
(Lots
(Lot 'H")
(Lot "I')
Portion of Prew~ Lane
Portion of Tierra Vista Road ·
Calle Nacido
Corte Copa
Via Fanita
& "G") Corte Rialto Via Mondo
Portion of Corte Fresca
agdtptX95X037.SXtt21760.tow 0315951ak~
EXHIBIT 'B' TO RESOLUTION NO. 95-
m
SUBJECT ACCEPTANCE- PUBUC STREETS INTO THE CITY-MAINTAINED
STREET SYSTEM AS INDICATED BELOW:
Prcject, Sitc ,
-, )
STATE
'A~aaCE
,.,..,'.,/
TRACT NO. 21760
ITEM 14
TO:
APPROVAl
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
FROM:
DATE:
City Council/City Manager
Joseph Kicek, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
March 28, 1995
SUBJECT:
Acceptance of Public Street into the City Maintained-Street System
(Butterfield Stage Road from Rancho California Road to De Portola Road)
PREPARED BY: ~'Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 95---
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A CERTAIN PUBLIC
STREET CONSTRUCTED UNDER ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO.
159 INTO THE CITY MAINTAINED-STREET SYSTEM
{BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD FROM RANCHO CALIFORNIA
ROAD TO DE PORTOLA ROAD)
BACKGROUND:
Rancho Villages Assessment District No. 159 was formed under the provisions of the
Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 while under the jurisdiction of the County of Riverside.
The Riverside County Transportation Department administers the construction contracts for
Assessment District No. 159 through consultant contract administrators and inspectors.
As each phase of work under the Assessment District program is completed, the consultants
recommend acceptance of the work to the Transportation Department and then to the Board'
of Supervisors. The Board 'then accepts the recommendation and executes and has filed a
"Notice of Completion".
n~AOD~"~s~0~2rdKFFpLD~,D.ACC
The Assessment District contractor has setisfactorily completed the construction Of Butterfield
Stage Road from Rancho California Road to De Portola Road in accordance with County plans,
specifications, and standards. The Board of Supervisors authorized the issuance of the Notice
of Completion for the public improvements end for similar improvements on Pauba Road from
Butterfield Stage Road to Easterly City Limits on July 7, 1992.
The Riverside County Transportation Department has so notified the City of Temecula, and the
City Public Works Department has reviewed the project in the field.
The Riverside County Transportation Department requests that the City of Temecula accept
the pertinent public improvements thereby accepting the maintenance responsibilities.
The Public Works Staff recommends City Council acceptance of the right-of-way and
acceptance of the Street and Drainage improvements in Butterfield Stage Road only at this
time. The Pauba Road improvements are not setisfactory to City Staff and will require some
repairs and related work to qualify for Staff recommendation for acceptance of improvements
and into the City Maintained-Street System.
The County of Riverside previously accepted some of the offers of dedication for street and
public utility purposes for portions of Butterfield Stage Road recommended for acceptance into
the Maintained-Street System for vesting purposes only and not into the County Maintained
Road System. The City Council more recently has accepted offers of dedication for portions
of this street for public road and public utility purposes.
Acceptance of the Street and Drainage improvements is recommended by Council Minute
Action. Acceptance of the street into the City Maintained-Street System shall be by City
Council Resolution in accordance with Streets and Highway Code Section No. 1806.
FISCAL IMPACT:
This street will be integrated into the City's Pavement Management System and will receive
periodic surface and/or structural maintenance efforts. The new pavement condition of this
street should necessitate only limited surface or structural treatments for 5 to 7 years. In
addition some erosion control measures may be necessary until such time as the parkway
improvements are completed through subsequent development activities.
ATTACHMENTS:
Resolution No. 95- with Exhibits "A-B", inclusive.
Board of Supervisors Minute Order dated July 7, 1992.
cc: Brad Buron, Maintenance Superintendent
RESOLUTION NO. 9S-
A RESOLIFfION OF ~ CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECUI,~ 'CALIFORNIA, ACCJ~II~G CERTAIN
SYSTEM (BU'rrl;RFf~ .n STAGE ROAD FROM RANCHO
C~TJFORNIA ROAD TO DE PORTOLA ROAD)
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEiVIECULA DOES REqOLVE, DETER/dINE
AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
WHEgEAS, Bedford Development Corporation, a California Corporation, dedicated
Lots "L" , "M" , and "N" in Parcel Map No. 23432, filed in Book 159, at Pages 38-61 Inclusive,
of Parcel Maps, to public use for street and public utility purposes. Said Lots were accepted by '-
the County of Riverside for vesting purposes only and not into the County
Road-Maintained System.
WItERF-AS, The Tomond Company, a California Corporation, offered for dedication
Lot *E* in Tract No. 23125-1, filed in Book246, at Pages 81-85 Inclusive, of Maps, for street
and public utility purposes. The City Council accepted said offer for public road and public
utility purposes. --
WtItREAS, Won Sang Yoo and Insook Yoo dedicated Lots "A", "B", and "C" in
Parcel Map No. 22429, filed in Book 147, at Pages 14-19 Inclusive, of Parcel Maps, for street
and public utility purposes. Said Lots were accepted by Riverside County for vesting purposes
and not into the County Road-Maintained System.
WHERE,, Taylor Woodrow Homes Ltd., a California Corporation, dedicated Lot "A"
in Tract No 23143-1, filed in Book 241, at Pages 79-88 Inclusive, for street and public utility
purposes. The City Council accepted said offer for public road and public utility purposes. Said
Lot "A" lies over a portion of said Lot 'C" of Parcel Map No. 22429.
WHEREAS, TAYCO, a California General Partnership, dedicated Lot "B" in Tract No
22715-1, fried in Book 205, at Pages 1-5 Inclusive, Lot "B" in Tract No. 22715-1, fried in Book
205, at Pages 59-65 Inclusive, Lot "B" in Tract No. 22715, filed in Book 206, at Pages 75-79
Inclusive, Lot "A" in Tract No. 22915-2, filed in Book 217, at Pages 51-59 Inclusive, and Lots
"A" and "B" in Tract 22916-3, filed in Book 225, at Pages 57-64 Inclusive, all to public use for
street and public utility'purposes.
Riverside County and the City Council accepted these Lots for public road and public utility
purposes.
WHI<uF-~kS, The City of Temecula became successors-in-interest to the County of
Riverside upon Incorporation, effective December 1, 1989.
WHER]~S, The Assessment District No. 159 contractor
has completed the public improvements in accordance with the plans, specifications, and
standards, and the Board of Supervisors has issued the Notice of Completion for this phase of
work;
r3AGDRPl%9S~2S~BUTFLDRD.ACC
WI~F:~zRIS, the Riverside County Translnrmtion Department has requested that the City
of Temecula accept the completed work for maintenance purposes;
~F~AS, the City concurs in the satisfactory completion of the work along Butterfield
Sta~e Road only and desires the acceptance of this street into the City Maintained-Street System:
NOW, TBI~R!~ORE, BE 1T RESOLV!~ by the City Council of the City of Temecula
as fonows:
Section 1. That the City of Temecula accept into the City M~intained-Street System
that street offered and accepted by the County of Riverside described in Exhibits 'A' and 'B'
attached hereto.
Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution and accept the '.
street and portions thereof, offered to and accepted by the County of Riverside and the City
Council, into the City Maintained-Street System as described in Exhibits 'A' and 'B' attached
hereto.
PASSRIJ, APPROVk~, AND ADOFrED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula
at a regular meeting held on the 28th day of March, 1995.
Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor
ATTEST:
lunc S. ~eek
City Clerk
c'sAGD~vI~5~0~2S~UTM2)RD.ACC
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
ClTY OF TEMEClmA ,)
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that
Resolution No. 95- was duly and re~larly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 28th day of March, 1995, by the following
vote:
AYES: 0
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 0
ABSTAIN: 0
COUNCILMFJVIBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNTERS:
COUNCH~MEMBERS:
r:~AGD~eT~5~0~28~BUTM,.DI~D.ACC
EXHIBIT "A' TO RESOLIJTION NO. 95-
Accep'Inf the de4i,-fions for public road and public ut~ity purposes,
as previously Branted to and accepted by the County of Riverside and by the
City Cotmoil, nil as indicfte4 ma Eahlbit ~Bn, and accepting those portions
of robjeer pubtic street lying within the City Limits into the City ~V[9|ntpined-
Street System as decrHMd below:.
A. Being Lots 'L", "M", and "N" in Parcel Map No. 23432, filed in Book 159,
at Pages 38-61 Inclusive, of Parcel Maps. Said Lots were accepted for vesting purposes
only by the County of Riverside.
B. Being Lot "E" in Tract No. 23125-1, filed in Book 246, at Pages 81-85
Inclusive, of Maps. Said Lot being accepted by the City Council.
C. Being Lots 'A" , "B" , and "C" in Parcel Map No. 22429, filed in Book 246,
at Pages 14-19 Inclusive, of Parcel Maps. Said Lots were accepted by for' vesting
purposes only by the County of Riverside.
D. Being Lot "A" in Tract No. 23143-1, filed in Book 241, at Pages 79-88
Inclusive, of Maps. Said Lot was accepted by City Council. This Lot lies over a portion
of Lot "C" of Parcel Map No. 22429.
E. Being Lot "B" in Tract No. 22715-1, filed in Book 205, at Pages 1-5
inclusive. Said Lot was accepted by City Council.
F. Being Lot "B" in Tract No. 22715-2, filed in Book 205, at Pages 59-65
Inclusive. Said Lot was accepted by City Council
G. Being Lot "B" in Tract No. 22715, filed in Book 206, at Pages 75-79
Inclusive. Said Lot was accepted by City Council.
H. Being Lot "A" in Tract No. 22915-2, filed in Book 217, at Pages 51-59
Inclusive. Said Lot as accepted by City Council.
I. Being Lots "A" and "B" in Tract No. 22916-3, filed in Book 225, at Pages
57-64 Inclusive. Said lots were accepted by City Council.
ALL PARCEl, MAPS AND TRACT MAPS NOTED ABOVE
WERE FILED INTHE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY
RECORDER, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CP, LWORNIA.
c,,s. ODItlxI'k~Js.~28,dIUTPLDRD.ACC
:.:xH:slT *B" TO ]~E~OLUTION NO. 95-
ACCEPTANCE- H/BLIC S11t.EET INTO THE CrI1'
MAINT~TItEET SYSTE~ AS INDICATED BI~-IOW:
Z3it~-I
Notice of ompletion
:Civil Code S 3093 - Public Works:
(For Recorder' s u.se)
Notice is hereby iven by the undersigned. owner, .-a public entity
of the State of Cal~fornia,'~hat a-public w~rk of improvement has
- =. . .... .. :, :u..':.:-, .i-,,. ..
been completecl, Is foll{:~8: .:..- :'.; .. ':' .,:.-,:::;2,.,::, '.
'. -. .'.."- .' :, ::t.~ ,~ -.. ~
Address of owner: .4080 Le~0n
Name of' contractor':.': '-""
-: ....-;-:.;.-,
Street addresS".~: lega. II~.
Project title or description, of work=' :."'Butt&'~:~'~'~i"dj.S~&_~'~ · ' "
- . .. .... ~-:..: ........ :, .... ..~ '.~.:;-~,~ ..~.~.: · ~: ./.:,'.
Im ovem ~, In 'the Temecula. areas%=;::; ..~:~,'~'~~ ..... :.:..,-'.. ~.~,~;7;:~";~ ,'-' :'- '-..
a.=. ~ ~.~?.~o.:....-:;.D.~.. of.-, t~..-,o~-'~ ~'::~:,'- :: ':'.-:~::':"' "j' :;f=~, .' '.;..- :,:.."
..- .,.'.-.., ,:,:... :.;-...,.....,:.... :-~b~::~.;:~-.;~;,..~:::~:.'.~.'-. U~..~.~82..,.-~r.:'.....
..=.~. ~ ~-.~ ,.." ~..ty..;:. ~.' :.:. ::;~,-=~..:..' ~::.,:~:::-:: .' ::~.::~::~ff~: :~::>;~:':::::~.~,-~2~: ;. v:~. ..'
.... - ....-.;':.:-Sq: ....- ....-. :1-'l :',Wo' '- · :~" :'~f.:=~'-~" '''~- ,;'~:'
-. .... " ' "' "' ' ...... ~(o,~a 9~1(; 7. ;::. ] '. ~"' '
Date~: Ju!y:'~7.,. 19
STATE OF C~tI ":':""':"' "'
I am the- bO'ard:' of. ''·''
the vers:t:de~.~:; '~,-~...-'-~'-~.~.- -;"~:j-:~:"";"". ~ ....;~:~:~'; '~:'~:'~""':" :"
en~i~~~e~e~...~e2. ~oregoing' ~~.'-: ~.~ on ~ose . . ·
the public ~~' '~nl~ . lai~ii.~~~ its~.~..' ' · '
eX:hive"rea "' i I oZ ~ '
behalf I
-:-'-.'.'-:' ;'. ::;~'.: '~f-::: :-' ". ";' .':' 2~ ·r::~ ::~"~; ,'
..; ~ ;: ::~:,...... ....:;.~-. . ,- --
· '" ;'-.:' .' ;:Z~ ~ {:" :'-': '~. <" ~ ......-. ,, ~ .::'"''. ' ....
' ' .-: -,.':~: ";'T'~':.;-' :~..: :..':' ::,'.
. :~ : .., '.' ~V '~.'- -;'~ .'::. '.:. '--:-,'-., ::.'..-::
~ :,:L.:.::..:~f:~:':<.z-.;..~ ....; ....~:.;.,:..:.,.-..;
; -;"-". .....'..~.-;--;:. ~.:::~: ..,,:.
...~::" ..
./.~ .'- :. .:::: ..: ......,,..-. ::~.. .....
., ~:~- . . .= .. . . . .
... : . .,. . .-.. . ~..-:, .... .,
, .-,:.
RD FORM 97
7//~/f,~-- ~. 7
ITEM 15
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
City Council/City Manager
(~ZL Joseph Kicak, Interim Director of Public Works/City Engineer
January 24, 1995
SUBJECT:
Acceptance of Public Streets into the City Maintained-Street System
(Portions of Butterfield Stage Road and De Portola Road)
PREPARED BY: ~ Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 95-_
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC
STREETS CONSTRUCTED UNDER ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO.
159 INTO THE CITY MAINTAINED-STREET SYSTEM
(BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD FROM DE PORTOLA ROAD TO
STATE HIGHWAY 79 (S) AND DE PORTOLA ROAD FROM
BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD TO EASTERLY CITY UMITS)
BACKGROUND:
Rancho Villages Assessment District No. 159 was' formed under the provisions of the
Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 while under the jurisdiction of the County of Riverside.
The Riverside County Transportation Department administers the construction contracts for
Assessment District No, 159 through consultam contract administrators and inspectors,
As each phase of work under the Assessment District program is completed, the consultants
recommend acceptance of the work to the Transportation Department and then to the Board
of Supervisors. The Board then accepts the recommendation and executes and has filed a
"Notice of Completion". In the subject instance, the contract was administered and accepted
by Rancho California Water District.
r:~egdrpt~95~O328~BUTDEPES.ACC 0316951AKC
The Assessment District contractor has satisfactorily completed Butterfield Stage Road from
De Portola Road to State Highway 79 {S) and De PortoIs Road from Butterfield Stage Road to
Easterly City Limits in accordance with County plans, specifications, and standards, The
Rancho California Water District issued a Notice of Acceptance for the public improvements
on January 30, 1995. The Riverside County Transportation Department has so notified the
City of Temecula, and the City Public Works Department has reviewed the project in the field.
The Riverside County Transportation Department requests that the City of Temecula accept
the pertinent public improvements thereby accepting the maintenance responsibilities for the
street improvements and for storm drainage facilities with pipe sizes 36-inches in diameter or
less. The major storm drain structures and pipes in excess of 36-inch diameter will be
maintained by Assessment District No 159 until the maintenance responsibilities are
transferred to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District.
The Public Works Staff recommends City Council acceptance of the right-of-way and:
acceptance of the street and pertinent drainage improvements into the City Maintained-Street
System.
The portion of De Portola Road within the City Limits was granted to the County of Riverside
on February 8, 1989 and then accepted by the County Road Commissioner for vesting
purposes only and not for inclusion in the County maintained-road system, said acceptance
recorded on February 22, 1989.
Acceptance of the Street and pertinent Drainage improvements is recommended by Council
Minute Action. Acceptance of the street into the City Maintained-Street System shall be by
City Council Resolution in accordance with Streets and Highway Code Section No. 1806.
FISCAL IMPACT:
These streets will be integrated into the City's Pavement Management System and will receive
periodic surface and/or structural maintenance efforts. The new pavement condition of these
streets should necessitate only limited surface or structural treatments for 5 to 7 years. In
addition some erosion control measures may be necessary until such time as the parkway
improvements are completed through subsequent development activities.
ATTACHMENTS:
Resolution No. 95- with Exhibits "A-B", inclusive.
Rancho California Water District "Notice of Acceptance" dated January 30, 1995.
cc: Brad Buron, Maintenance Superintendent
r:%egdrpt%95%O328%BUTDEPES.ACC 031695/AKC
RE~LUTION NO.
A I~.SOLlYrION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY
OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ACcEI-I1NG CERTAIN
SYSTEM (Bl~Trl~m~t-D STAGE ROAD FROM DE
PORTOLA ROAD TO HIGHWAY 79 6) AND DE PORTOLA
ROAD FROM BU'rrEKFr~ ,n STAGE ROAD TO
EASTERLY C1TY LlafiTS)
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMF, C~ DOES RESOLVE, DB'rER/aNE
AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, The Riverside County Board of Supervisors by Resolution No. 89-251 on'.
1une 13, 1989, accepted certain offers of dedications for public roads as recorded December 5,
1975, as Instrument No. 151727 for portions of De Portoh Road and Butterfield. Stage Road.
Said portions are shown on Parcel Map No. 6428, recorded in Book 20, Pages' 70 through 73
of Parcel Maps. Acceptance of often was for vesting purposes only and not into the County
Road-Maintained System.
WHEREAS, Bedford Development Company, a California C~tion, dedicated Lot
"Q" (Butterfield Stage Road) in Par~ Map No. 23432, filed in Book 159, at Pages 38-61
Inclusive of Parcel Maps, to public use for street and public utility purposes. The County Road
Said Lot *Q* was accepted by the Riverside County Surveyor and Road Commissioner on behalf
of the Board of Supervisors for vesting purposes only and not into the County Maintained-Road
System.
WHEREAS, The Toman Company,a California Corporation, offered for dedication Lot
"D" , (De Portoh Road), in Tract No. 23125-1, filed in Book 246, at Pages 81-85 Inclusive, of
Maps, for public use for street and public uti;lity purposes. The City Council accepted said
offer for public road and public utility purposes.
WHEREAS, Kaufman and Broad of San Diego, Inc., a California Corporation, offered
for dedication Lot 'A* , (De Portoh Road), in Tract No. 23125-3, filed in Book 252, at Pages
3947 Inclusive, for public use for street and public utility purposes. The Cit Council accepted
said offer for public road and public utility purposes.
~, The City of Temecula became successors:m-interest to the County of
Riverside upon Incorporation, effective December 1, 1989;
WHEREAS, The Assessment District No. 159 contractor has completed the public
improvements in accordance with the plans, specifications, and standards, and the Rancho
California Water District has issued the Notice of Acceptance for this phase of work;,
WNERF_AS, the Riverside County Transportation Department has requested that the City
of Temeeula accept the completed work for maintenance purposes;
r:~agdrpt~95~0328~,BUTDEPES.ACC 0316951AKC
W!~Eul~-&S, the City concurs in the satisfactory completion of the work and recommends
the acceptance of these streets into the City Maintained-Street System:
NOW, TItERI~-!~ORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Temecula
as follows:
Section 1. That the City of Temeatla accept into the City lVt~dntained-Street System :
those streets offered and accepted by the County of Riverside, and offered and accepted by the
City Council, described in Exhibits "A" and "B" ~tt~checl hereto.
..Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of thig resolution and accept the
streets and portions thereof, offered to and accepted by the County of Riverside for vesting
purposes only, and the City Council, into the City-maintained street system as described in
Exhibits *A* and *B* attached hereto.
PASSE!), APPROVEB, AND ADOFrED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula
at a regular meeting held on the 28th day of March, 1995.
Jeffery E. Stone, Mayor
ATFF, ST:
June S. Greek
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALn~ORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TElVlECULA )
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that
Resolution No. 95- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecuh at a regular meeting thereof held on the 28th day of March, 1995, by the following
COUNCILI~n~-MBBRS:
COUN~HRS:
COUNC~BRS:
COUN~BRS:
vote:
AYES: 0
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 0
ABSTAIN: 0
r:~agdrpt~SS't0328~BUTDEPES.ACC 031695/AKC
EXHIBIT "A" TO RESOLUTION NO. 95-
Accepting those parcels dedicated to the
public for public roads and/or streets and
public utility purposes accepted for vesting
purposes but not for road-maintained purposes
by the County of Riverside, and those parcels
dedicated to public use for street and public
utility purposes and accepted by the City
Council, all as indica'ted on Exhibit "B", into
the City Maintained-Street System as
described below:
A. Those portions of Portola Road and Butterfield Stage Road
lying within the City Limits of the City of Temecula, as described
in instrument No. 151727, recorded December 5, 1975, and
shown on Parcel Map No. 6428, recorded in Book 20, Pages 70
through 73, of Parcel Maps and as accepted for vesting purposes
only by Riverside County Resolution No. 89-251, all recorded in
the office of the County Recorder, Riverside County, California.
B. Lot "Q" in Parcel Map No. 23432, filed in Book 159, at Pages
38-61 Inclusive, of Parcel Maps, said Lot "Q" being accepted by
the County of Riverside for vesting purposes only.
C. Being Lot "D" in Tract No. 23125-1, filed in Book 246, at
Pages 81-85 Inclusive, of Maps, in the office of the County
Recorder, Riverside County, California.
D. Being Lot A" in Tract No. 23125-3, filed in Book 252, at
.Pages 39-47 Inclusive, of Maps, in the office of the County
Recorder, Riverside County, California.
r:%egdq~t%95~O328%BUT!)EPES.ACC 0316951AKC
EXHIBIT 'B' TO RESOLUTION NO. 95~__
SUBJECT ACCEPTANCE- PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY-MAINTAINED
STREET SYSTEM AS INDICATED BELOW:
.,I
, :,
-/
~15 AT%eHT~, LI~, '
STATE I ,v?a,*,~..a
Rsn~o Califomis Water Dbtria
Post Office B~ 9017
Tcm~ula, CA 92589-9017
NOTICe-~OF ACCI~FANC~.
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVt~ BY RANCHO CALIFO~ WATER DISTRICT, A
PUBLIC CORPORATION, PURSUANT TO SECTION 1192.10F TH!~ CODE OF CIVIL
PROCEDURE, THAT:
The proira:t, ~q.~rnent Distria No. 159, Butv-~ield Sts~ Rosd, [Ii~hwsy 79 and
De Ponola Road-East, Phss~ I (Projea No. D0~), wss ~ by the Ran~ho
California Wat~ District on January 10, 199f;
The name of the mnuaaor is Utah Pacifi~
S. Th~ name of the surety is Sa/v~ Insurance Company of Amcri2;
The de. smp~on of the p,~p~ ~, or public work or ~ is: Street improvm, ent,
storm drain, Sradin& water and sewer.
RANCRO CAI,WORNIA WATgR DISTRICT
Da~:.Jmnnmr~ ~0,1qq~
STATE OF CALIFORNIA }
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE}
John F. Hep-i~r ' ~
I am the General Ma~aF.r of the Rancho California Water Distri~ a public corporation,
nnd as such tnnlz this veti~ation for and on behaff of said ganc~ Califtm~ Water
District, I have read dz f~mgoing Noti~ of ~ptance and know the contents thereof, and
the facts therein stated are true.
I declare trader p~nalty of pro'jury thax the foregoing is rose and correct.
~~d on auuaz~ 30,1995
· at Temecula, ~,,
I
msebOlO/a~l-IU,/D04.14
John F. H~s't~~m~'d~
C, en~ral Manager
-CAMFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE AGKN~ENT
and' t~e~ to~m/m~~e/they executed the
i ~
eme~tdlt~;i, m, dl~'lu,41 ~ asksrid by
~mmmmmmmm~e WffN~myhmndmndol~cimlmmmL
mllllmmllNIslm
OPTIOll4I,
Description of Attac~ Doc~
Signm4s) Otmr ~ Named Above: -
Capaclty(i'it) Claimed by $1g.ner~.
Signers Name: ,,TbA~ ~'-
~ oc~.xme .O~k:er r
TlUe(s): ~;mq4,mr
[] Attomey-in-Fect - (:] AU~;rJy I&~ Fact
(:) Guardian or C4Naeeve
Signer Is Fiepelsenting: Signer Is rlmFrmmm 41r; :
mammm, mmm, ll~' Ilemme. falllil~m 1~
ITEM 16
APPROVAl ~
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFIC
[] CITY MANAGE
CITY OF TEMECULA
AOENDA REPORT
FROM:
DATE:
City Council/City Manager
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
March 28, 1995
SUBJECT:
Acceptance of Public Street into the City Maintained-Street System
(De Portola Road-Margarita Road to Butterfield Stage Road)
PREPARED BY: ~'~!bert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 95~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC
STREET CONSTRUCTED UNDER ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO.
159 INTO THE CITY MAINTAINED-STREET SYSTEM (DE
PORTOLA ROAD FROM MARGARITA ROAD TO BUTTERFIELD
STAGE ROAD)
BACKGROUND:
Rancho Villages Assessment District No. 159 was formed under the provisions of the
Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 while under the jurisdiction of the County of Riverside.
The Riverside County Transportation Department administers the construction contracts for
Assessment District No. 159 through consultant contract administrators and inspectors.
As each phase of work under the Assessment District program is completed, the consultants
recommend acceptance of the work to the Transportation Department and then to the Board
of Supervisors. The Board then accepts the recommendation and executes and has filed a
"Notice of Completion".
The Assessment District contractors have satisfactorily completed the construction of De
Portola Road from Margarita Road to Butterfield Stage Road in accordance with County plans,
specifications, and standards. The Board of Supervisors authorized the issuance of the Notice
of Completion for the first phase of public improvements on April 2, 1991. The second or final
phase of public improvements (Cap course of aspheltic concrete paving) was constructed
under Rancho California Water District (RCWD) jurisdiction/administration in order to expedite
the completion and presentation of improvements to the City of Temecula. The Riverside
County Transportation Department has so notified the City of Temecula, and the City Public
Works Department has reviewed the project in the field.
The Riverside County Transportation Department requests that the City of Temecula accept
the pertinent public improvements thereby accepting the maintenance responsibilities.
The Public Works Staff recommends City Council acceptance of the right-of-way and
acceptance of the Street and Drainage improvements into the City Maintsined-Straet System.
The County of Riverside previously accepted the offer of dedication for street and public utility
purposes for this portion of De Portola Street for vesting purposes only and not into the
County Maintained-Road System.
Acceptance of the Street and Drainage improvements is recommended by Council Minute
Action. Acceptance of the street into the City Maintained-Street System shall be by City
Council Resolution in accordance with Streets and Highway Code Section No. 1806.
FISCAL IMPACT:
This street will be integrated into the City's Pavement Management System and will receive
periodic surface and/or structural maintenance efforts, The new pavement condition of this
street should necessitate only limited surface or structural treatments for 5 to 7 years. In
addition some erosion control measures may be necessary until such time as the parkway
improvements are completed through subsequent development activities.
ATTACHMENTS:
Resolution No. 95- with Exhibits "A-B", inclusive.
Board of Supervisors Minute Order dated April 2, 1991.
Rancho California Water District "Notice of Acceptance" dated January 30, 1995.
Rancho California Water District Contract Change Order No. 34
cc: Brad Buron, Maintenance Superintendent
1H~,OLUTION NO. 9~-
A RF.,~LUTION OF THE C1TY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TI~iECULA, C~LIFORNIA, ACCIa-t~IG CERTAIN
STREETS INTO THE C1TY MAINT~TREET
SYSTEM (DE PORTOLA-ROAD FROM MARGARITA
ROAD TO BU'rrERFIEtD STAGE ROAD)
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF Tt~i~CULA DOES RESOLVE, DETER,MINE
AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, Bedford Development Company, a California Corporation, dedicated for
street and public utility
purposes that portion of 'Road Easement' demarcated as "De Ponoh Road" on Parcel Map
23432 filed in Book 159 of Parcel Maps, at pages 38-61 Inclusive, in the office of the County
Recorder, Riverside County, California; said *Road Easement" being accepted by the Riverside
County Board of Supervisors for vesting purposes only but not into the County Maintained-Road
System.
WHEREAS, The City of Teme~ula became suo:essors-in'interest to the County of
Riverside upon Incorporation, effective December 1, 1989.
WHEREAS, The Assessment District No. 159 contractors have completed the public
improvements in accordance with the plans, specifications, and standards.
W!tF~REAS, The Riverside County Board of Supervisors has issued the Notice of
Completion for the first phase of work;
WHEREAS, The Rancho California Water District has issued a "Notice of Acceptance*
for the second and final phase of work;
WHEREAS, the Riverside County Transportation Department has requested that the City
of Temecula accept the completed work for maintenance purposes;
WIllIEAS, the City concurs in the satisfactory completion of the work and desires the
acceptance of this street into the City Maintained-Street System:
NOW, THI~RE, BE If RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Temecula
as follows:
Section 1. That the City of Temecula accept into the City Maintained-Street System
that street offered and accepted by the County of Riverside described in Exhibits "A" and
attached hereto.
Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution and accept the
street and portions thereof, offered to and accepted by the County of Riverside, into the City
Maintained-Street System as described in Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto.
r.'~AGDIG~T~9S~0328'~,DHPORTOL WST 0~IglAK. C
PASSED, APPROVI~, AND ADOFf!~, by the City Council of the City of Temecuh
at a regular meeting held on the 28th day of March, 1995.
Jeffrey Stone, Mayor
ATI'EST:
June S. Greek
City Clerk
[sr~]
STATE OF CAIJFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that
Resolution No. 95- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecuh at a regular meeting thereof held on the 28th day of March, 1995, by the following
vote:
AYES: 0
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 0
ABSTAIN: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMBMBERS:
COUNTERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
r.~g3D~2S~DBYORTOLWST O~lff~lAi~C
EXHIBIT "A" TO RESOLUTION NO. 95-
Acceptinl the "Road F~,-nents" for public road and public utility purposes,
as previously Branted to the County of Riverside and accepted for vesting
purposes only, all as indicated on Exhibits "As and "B", into the City
Maintained-Street System as described below:
That portion of that "Road Easement" dedi~ted for street and public utility
purposes and demarcated as De Portoh Road on Parcel Map 23432 filed in Book 159 of
Parcel Maps, at Pages 38-61, inclusive, in the Office of the County Recorder, Riverside
County, California; said *Road Easement" was accepted by the Riverside County Board
of Supervisors for vesting purposes only but not into the County Maintained Road
System.
~:xHislT "B" TO RE~OLUTION NO. 9~.
:
r:~&GDKP'I*~'~ia~DHPORTOLWST (BI~AXC
z;Ia~ID1T *B* TO RESOLUTION NO. 9S'
SUBJECT ACCEFrANCE- FUBLIC STI~r INTO ~ CITY
MAINTAINII)*SI~I~rr SYSTEM AS INDICATED BELOW
--Z,
(For Recorder's use)
a public entity
improvement has-
Notice of Completion
Zi~il Code ~ 3093 -' Public Works]
Notice is hereby ~iven by the undersigned owner,
>f the State of California,. that a public work of
completed, as followsz · ·
project title or description of work: Construct Deportola Road
, ' ;' Margarita Roa~ =o Butterfield Stage_Road
Date of completion: Date' of this ~otice·
.. . ::.. . - ..] .: .. . .. ~..
~'~ure of ~er: ~unt~.~ . :' '].... .'.' ' ~]~J~j
lnterest or estate-of]Met: .Fub!.~c Roadway '...
Street
Address of cn~ner~ 4080 Lemon' St. 8th Floor' .Riverstde'Califorantl 92501
= .. · ' .:...:..: . . "::. L .i:-'~j .'-':
Wk-,, Reeoraa,~ leturn m:
Raucho California Water District
Post Office Box 90~7
Teme~ula, CA 92~89-90~7
NOTleg OF ACC~TANCR
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVl~ BY RANCHO CALIFO~ WATER DISTRICT, A ..
PUBLIC CORPORATION, PUR.qU~TO SECTION 1192.10F TH~ CODE OF CIVIL
PROCEDURE, THAT:
1. The proje~, Aue~ment District No. 159, Butterfield Stage Road, Highway 79 and
De Ponoh Road-East, Phn~e I (Project No. D0484), was accepted by the Ratwho
California Water District on January 10, 1995;
The name of the contraaor is Utah Pacific;
3. The name of the surety is Safeco Insurance Company of Amerim;
Tho description of the l~ol~.ty or public work or structure is: Street hnprovcment,
storm drain, grading, water and sewer.
RANClIO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT
Dat~: .,TmnramTI[ ~L0 · 1 qqq
STATE OF CAt.IFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE)
.Olmerai Manager
I am' the General Manager of the Rancho Cadifomia Water Disuict, a public corponltion,
and as such make this verifi~tion for and on behalf ~ said Rancho California Water
Districtl I have read the foregoing Notice of Acceptance and know the contents thered, and
the f'acu therein stated are true.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
~xc~*uted on Jauuaz~ 3 O ,L995
· at Temecula, Chlifnrnia.
L
Dis Id~010/AIXe- 1 a/I)O06
C~n~ral Manager
CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE .AQIUdOWLEDOMENT
. .-.y.~-~ ~---~ ?~ .... ~-Z--_::-~ -~, ~ ';' '; '~ -~" ~ ~ ~ ~ .... ' .... ...........
~r,-,c,~ ~,,,/Ps ,,/o ,",,,rs-, rc,
'~:Ueor~of(:~x:umerd:/~o-/",e.~' OF
Document Date: ~ - ,.~/ /'~-~" Num~r of Pages: /
Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: -
sagnets N,m,- -:7~-,-) ~ ~'-" ~ He, e-
'~s)- ~:"~ ,e,,F-/,,~gme- Tree(s): ral
[] Attorney-in-Fact · ~ ~
o,,,4;,deM,eawy~amad,n.aaen,wmm~,,e..P,o.k, nu,cameeP,&CAtmff'e4 i,,LNe. aW
~/~,personally known to rrm - Cn
whose nam~ subvJtb s to the within instrument
and .- ~lJJia ~o me ~C~e4hey e:mc-'le,'J the
falrne~s~erAhc, il' authorized apeoity(ibe~and
...... ,.~e'~ ' ' 't ~:~ni~r signmum(s) on
_~3l~Jte~ the Instrument.
Description of Attached Decument
ITEM
17
30:
.~,PPROVAI-
CITY ATTORNEY .
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
FROM: (~ Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
DATE: March 28, 1995
SUBJECT: Accept Public Improvements in Tract No. 21760
PREPARED BY: ~k, lbert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council accept the public improvements in Tract No 21760, authorize reduction
in Faithful Performance Bond amounts for streets, water, and sewerimprovements, accept the
Faithful Performance warranty bond in the reduced amount, and direct the City Clerk to so
notify the Developer and Surety.
BACKGROUND:
The City Council received and filed the map for Tract No. 21760 on June 12, 1990.
Subdivision Agreements and Surety Bonds were posted with the Clerk of the Board of
Supervisors by:
Rancho Highlands Venture I
for the improvement of streets, sewer and water system, and subdivision monumentation.
Accompanying the Subdivision Agreements were surety Bonds, issued by Insurance Company
of the West as follows:
2.
3.
4.
5.
Bond No. 1159341 in the amount of $1,236,000to cover street improvements.
Bond No. 1159341 in the amount of $227,500to cover water improvements.
Bond No. 1159341 in the amount of $238,500 to cover sewer improvements.
Bond No. 1159342 in the amount of $38,800 to cover subdivision monumentation.
Bond No. 1159341 in the amounts of $618,250, $113,750, and $119,250,
respectively, to cover street, water, and sewer material and labor.
-1- r:~agdtptL95\O3:28~rl1760.acc 0316951akc
On April 28, 1992, the CityCo,Jncil authorized a reduction in street, water, and sewer Faithful
Performance Bond amounts, approved a replacement Subdivision Improvement Agreement and
accepted surety bonds, as posted by St, Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, in the
reduced amounts as follows:
1. Bond No. 400JG7702 in the amount of $276,000 to cover remaining street
im provemerits.
2. Bond No. 400JG7702 in the amount of $45,500 to cover remaining water
improvements
3. Bond No, 400JG7702 in the amount of $48,000 to cover remaining sewer
improvements,
Additionally, the surety replaced Material and Labor and Subdivision Monumentation in the full '-
amounts as follows:
1. Bond No. 400JG7702 in the amounts of $618,250, $113,750, and $119,250,
respectively to cover street, water, and sewer material and labor.
2. Bond No. 400JG7703in the amount of $38,800to cover subdivision monumentation.
The new developer/owner is:
WRI Rancho Highlands Venture, a California Limited Partnership
c/o Weyerhaueser Venture Company
21515 Hawthorne Boulevard, Suite 310
Torrance, CA 90503
Staff has inspected and verified the public improvements. The Eastern Municipal and Rancho
California Water Districts have accepted their items of work. The Public Works Department
therefore recommends acceptance of the public improvements, reduction in Faithful
Performance Bond amounts to the ten-percent warranty level, and initiation of the one-year
warranty period.
Therefore it is appropriate to reduce the Faithful Performance Bond amount as follows:
Street, Water, and Sewer Improvements $199,250
The subdivider is submitting a rider to the Faithful Performance Bond in the following amount:
Street, Water, and Sewer Improvements Bond No. 400JG7702 $170,250
The developer was required to post Material and Labor bonds to ensure payment to suppliers
and workers, These bonds are maintained in effect for a period of time determined by the
Subdivision Improvement Agreement after the City Council has accepted the improvements.
The Subdivision Monument Bond will be recommended for release following final inspection
and approval of the Monuments and related work.
-2- r:.~qdqs%95M]328~'21760acc 03169S/aim
The affected streets are being accepted into the City Maintained-Street System by City council
Resolution No. 95- at this time. The streets within the subdivision are Corte Rialto, Via
Fanira, Via Mondo, Calls Nacido, Corte Col}a, and portions of Tierra Vista Road, Preece Lane,
and Corte Fresca.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Location Map
2. Faithful Performance Warranty Bond (On file)
-3- r:.~sZd~pt~95~O328~r21760.mcc 0316951skc
Project
4
NI6WWAY
Project
,,
vt® lie ~
,,, ,..,, y/C'/,4//2"J/
·.
i;=,,, mours
TR ACT NO. 9, 1760
l,ocation Map
ITEM 18
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Council
f
Ronald E..Bradley, City Manager
March 28, 1995
Contract Amendment - Kicak and Associates
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve an amendment to the Kicak and Associates contract.
BACKGROUND:
On September 20, 1994, the City entered into a contract with Joe Kicak, of Kicak and
Associates, to provide Interim Director of Public Works/City Engineer services while a
recruitment was conducted to fill the position on a permanent basis.
The recruitment, for the Director of Public Works/City Engineer position, took longer than
anticipated; therefore, the City needed services from~Kicak and Associates for longer period
of time.
The Contract was for an amount not to exceed 125,000for the total term of the agreement.
Including the additional time spent as Interim Director, the work totaled 136,000. Therefore,
a contract amendment for 111,000 is required.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There are adequate funds available in account 100-164-604-5250 for this contract
amendment. The amount required for the contract services will be offset by savings in the
line item for salaries.
AMENDMENT TO AG~ FOR PROFESSIONAL SBRVICES
This First Amendment is dated as of March 28, 1995, by and between the City of Temecula and
Kicak and Associates. The Agreement dated September 20, 1994, between the City of
Temecula, and Kicak and Associates, (hereinaeer refeffed as "~ent*) is hereby amended
as fonows:
RE: Interim Director of Pubtic Works/City Engim~ Services
Section 2
The Scope of Work will remain the same.
Section 3
Compensation for services mh~ll be toUd compensation of all services described in the
Amendment and sludl be payable not to exceed $36,000 for Interim Director of Public
Works/City Engineer services.
Section 4
All other tens and conditions of the Agreement shall remnin the same.
CONTRACTOR
The parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the dale and year above written.
C1TYOFTEMECUI~
By: By:
Kicak and Associates
Ronald E. Bradley
City M~n~ger
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter Thorson, ~ Attorney
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
R:~alq~I~DAKr, AK.MiS ~1/~
ITEM 19
ORDINANCE NO. 9S-06
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TI~IECULA BEPEALING SF, C~ON 6.04.010 AND
ADDING CIL4kFrERS 6.02, 6.06 AND 6.08 TO THE
TI~fECL~ MUNICIPAL CODE RF~ULATING ~
~cE~:PL~G AND CONTROL OF DOGS, CATS AND
OTHER ANIMALS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TBivlF, EULA DOES
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Section 1.08.020 of the Temecula Municipal Code is amended to remove
Ordinance 534 from the list of County Ordinances adopted by reference.
Section 2. Chapter 6.02 is added to the Temeeula Municipal Code to read as follows:
"Chapter 6.02. Ke~i}ing ,,rid controlling hogs ,,rid C~ts: Control
and Suppression of Rabies.
Section 6.02.010. ne~nitions. Whenever, in this Chapter or in any resolutionor
standard adopted by City Council puntant to this Chapter, the following terms are used,
they shall have the meaning ascribed to them in this Section, unless it is appsrent from the
context thereof that some other meaning is intended.
A. ' Animsl Rescuer" means any individual who routinely obtains a dog or cat from
the rightful owner of said animal, or any animal from an animal shelter that has been
B. "At I ~r~e" means any dog which is off the premises of its owner, custodian or
caretaker and which is not under physical restraint by a leash of a size and material
appropriate to the size and temperament of the dog and which is held by a person capable of
restraining such dog, or is not otherwise physically restrained by some other device or
instrumentality, except that such device or instrumentnllty shall not include voice control, eye
control or signal control of the dog by any person, device or instrumentality.
C. "C'~ttery" means any building, structure, enclosure or ~ses whereupon, or
within which, ten (10) or more cats, four (4) months of age or older, ar~ !zpt or maintained.
D. "Chief Animsl Control Officer" means the Chief Animal Contwl Office of the
City. City my contract with the County of Riverside or any other public or private agency
to serve as the Chief Animal Control Officer.
Otd, 95Oi I
E. "Cls~ I Kennel" means any building, ~tv,_cture, enclosure or premisel
whereupon, or within which, five (5) to ten (10) dogs, four months of age or older, are kept
F. *C!~.t~ H Kennel* means any building, structure, enclosure or premises
whereupon, or within which, eleven (11) or more dogs, four (4) months of age or older, are
G. 'Guide r}og* means any dog trained or being reared, trained or used for the
purpose of guiding a blind person.
H. sH~lth Officer" means the Health Officer of the County of Riverside or his
duly autho~d re~p, cs;.atafive. '.
I. *Impounded* means having been received into the custody of any animal
control center, animal control officer, animal control vehicle or peace officer duly authorized
by the City of Temecula to receive such animal.
J. 'Person' mmns any individual, firm, Imtmmhip, joint venture, corporation,
association, club or organization.
K. "Public t~.ntity" means any state, or public subdivision, municipal corporation
or agency th~f.
L. *Sentry r}og'" means any dog U'ained to work without supervision in a feaced
facih'ty and to deter and deUtin unauthorized persons found within the facility. The term
"guard dog' shall also mean 'sentry dog*.
M. "Service Dog," means any dog being reared, trained or used for purposes of
ridfilling the particular requirements of a physically disabled person including but not limited
to minimal protection work, rescue work, pulling a wheelchair or fetching dropped item.
N. "Signal Bog," means any dog trained or being reared or trained or used for the
purpose of alerting a deaf person or a person whose heating is impaired, to intruders or
sounds°
"Unlicensed r}og," means any dog for which no valid license is currently in
P. 'Unnltered nnd Un~llayed" means a condition that exists in an animal which
permits the producing of offspring. A dog or cat that has not been spayed or neutered.
Q. "V~e~ina~on" means inoaxlation against rabies of any dog or cat, four (4)
months of age or older, with any canine presajbed for the purpose of the California
R. "Veterinnflnn" means a person holding a currently valid license to practice
veterinary medicine issued by the 8ts,~ of California pursuant to Chapter 11 of the California
B~n_aq and Professions Code.
S. 'Vicious hog/Vicious r'-~t' means any dog or cat which-has bitten a person or
-animal without provocation or direction or which has a disposition or propensity to attack or
bite any person or animal without provocation or direction.
Section 6.02.020. Mandatory Dog T,icensing nnd Vaccination.
A. Except as provided in Section 6.02.040 A, it shall be unlaw~~ for any person
to own, harbor, or keep any dog, four (4) months of age or older, within the City of
Temecula, for a period longer than thirty (30) days, unless a currently valid license tag has
been issued by Chief Animal Control Officer.
B. It shall be unlawful for any person to own, harbor or keep any dog, four (4)
months of age or older, within the City of Temecula, for a period longer than thirty (30)
days, which has not been v~ccin~ted against rabies. Every person in the City of Temecula
who owns, harbors or keeps any dog over four (4) months of age for a period longer than
thirty (30) days shah have such dog vaccination shah be renewed in aceordanee with the
applicable laws and regulations of the State of California.
C. Each veterinarian after vnccinnting any dog shah sign a certificate of
vaccination in duplicate in the form required by the Chief Animal Control Officer. The
veterinarian shall keep on (1) copy and shnll give one (1) copy to the owner of the vaccinated
dog and the owner shall retain such copy in his possession.
D. The Chid Animal ConU'ol Officer shall issue a license only upon presentation
of a certificate of vaccination indicating therein that the date of expiration of the vaccination
immunity is not earlier than the date of expiration of the license being issued or renewed,
upon payment of the applicable license fee specified in Section 6.02,020 F provided,
however, that where the vaccinated dog is between the ages of four (4) months and twelve
(12) months, the period d vaccination immunity required for licensing shall be as specified
in Tifie 17, California Admini_sU'a~ve Code, Section 2606.4.
E. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 6.02.020B and D, in the event a dog
has a short-term illness, is pregnant or suffers from a long term debilitnting illness which in
the opinion of a veterinarian contraindicates vaccination for rabies, such dog shall not be
required to undergo vaccination during the period of such illness or pregnancy where a
request for vaccination deferral has been approved by the Chief Animal Control Officer.
Such request shall specify the duration of the requested tiefermi, and shall be signed by a
veterinarian. The Chief Animal Control Officer shall issue a license for such dog upon
onls 95-4~ 3
approval of the request for vnc~inn"on defenal and payment for the applicable license fee
specified in Section 6.02.020 F. The owner and person having custody of such dog shall
confine and shall keep such dog copfined, for the duntim of the de, fermi. Within fourteen
(14) days after the expimtion of thc deferml, the owner or person having custody of such dog
shall present the Chief Animal Control Officer a certificate of vnt,cin~tion in accordance with
the provisions of this Section.
F. Subject to the provisions of this Section, .cen,es shah be issued upon payment
of the applicable fee as set by City Council Resolution adopted following a public hemring
noticed as required by State Law.
G. No fee shall be required for a license for any guide dog, signal dog or service
dog, if such dog is in the possession and under the contwl of, in the case of a guide dog, a
blind person, or in the case of a signal dog, a deaf or heating-'h-npaired, or service dogs for
the physically disabled.
H. No fee shall be required for a lic~___se for any dog owned by a public entity.
I. Each license specified in this Section shall be valid for the period specified in
Section 6.02.020 F shall be renewed within thirty (30) days after such period terminates,
except that where the current v-arclnntlon for the dog which is the subject of the.license ~n11.
expire prior to the expintion date of the license being applied for, the Chief Animal Control"
Officer may upon request of the owner or custodian of such dog bacird__n_te such license so that
its expiration date occurs concurrently with or prior to the expiration date of the vnccinntlon;
provided, however, that where such b~chtstlng is performed, there shall be no reduction or
discount of the license fee applicable to the license applied for, and such license shall be
renewed within thirty (30) days after the date of its expiration.
J. Whenever a dog validly licensed under this Chapter shah have died more than
three (3) months before the expiration date of the license, the owner of such dog may return
the license tag to the Chief Animal Contwl Officer, accompsnied by a statement signed by a
veterinarian or a declaration signed under penalty of perjury by the owner, indicating that
such dog is dead and specifying the date of death. In such event, the license shall be
canceled and a pro-rata credit of the license fee by ftdl calendar quarten of the original
license period remaining after the death of the dog my be applied during said remsininL
period to the license fee for another dog acquired by the same owner.
K. Upon transfer of ownership of any dog vafidly ficensed under this Chapter, the
new owner shall notify the Chief Animal Control Officer, accompanied by a transfer fee as .
set by Council Resolution.
L. Notwithstnnding the provisions of Section 6.02.020 A, where a person moves
into the City of Temecula from another community who owns a dog which is currently
v~ccin~ted a2ainst rabies and for which dog a license was issued by such other community,
Onis95-06 4
such li_~__~ shall be deemed valid for a period of one (1) year from the date such person
moves into the City, or the date of expiration of the license issued by the other community,
whichever is earlier. If an application for a license from the Chief Animal Control Officer is
made more than thirty (30) days after such license is required, the applicant shall pay the
applicable lain fee. '
M. Upon request of the Chief Animal Control Officer, any owner of a dog for
which a license is required under the provisions of this Chapter shall present to the Chief
Animal Control Officer a currently valid certificate of rabies vaccination or license tag.
N. It shall be unlawful for any person to mnlm use of a stolen, counterfeit or
unauthorized license, tag, certificate or any other document or thing for the purpose of
evading the provisions of this Chapter.
Section 6.09.025: Conu'ol of Un~l~tyed snd Unsltered Cats.
It shah be unlawful for any penon who owns, harbon, or lzeps any unspayed or
unaltez~ cat four (4) months of age or older within the City to allow or permit such
unspayed or unaltered cat to be or remain outdoon.
Section 6.02.030. Intentionally Omitted.
Section 6.(Y2,040. Msndatory Licensing of Kennels and Cmtteries.
A. No person sbnll operate or maintain a iznnel or a cattery without first
obtaining an appropriate license thereof from the Chief Animal Control Officer. Such license
shall be valid for a period of either one (1) or (2) years from the date of issuance, except that
the Chief Animal Control Officer may, in his discretion, limit the duration of the license to
one (1) year when he deems such limitations to be appropthte. Said license shall be
renewed within thirty (30) days after the date of expiration. Where a lumnel ficense has been
issued and is in effect, the dogs contained in such kennel shall be exempt from the
requirements of individual license tags as provided in Section 6.02.020 A. The kennel
license fees and late fees, ff an application for a license is made more than thirty (30) days
after the date such license is required, shall be set pursuant to City Council Resolution
adopted foliowing a public hearing noticed as required by State Law.
B. Application for a knmel or catin7 license shall be ~ed with the Chief Animal
Control Officer on a form plzsc~bed by him not later than ten (10) days aftff obtaining
written verification from the City of Temecula's Planning Departmeat that the opention of
the Imrmel or cattery is in compliance with the applicable provisions of the City land use and
zoning ordinances. Said application form, when completed, ~Sll conlain such information as
may reasonably be required by the Chief Animal Control Officer for the purposes of
enforcement of this Chaptear, including but to limited to the current home telephone numbear
Onis 95-06
Where a kennel or cattery is sought to be operated uptmleasedorrentedpremi--es~, aletterof
consent from the owner of the premisesto the effect that the inmnel or cattery may be
Officer at the time the appfication for the kennel or cattery license is submitted.
C. After receipt of a kennel or caUery license application, the Chief Animal
Control Officer shall make an inspection of the premises of the kennel or catlay for which a
ficense is requested. No kennel or caUay ricerise shall be issued nor shall any such ficense
Contwl Officer, sstinfies the applicable hws and regulations of the State of California, the
appficable ordinances of the City of Temecula and the appficable conditions set forth in the
Standards for Kennels and C~tteries. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Chapter,
the Chief Animal Control Officer or the City Plnnnlng ~ may, in their respective
discretion, limit the numbers of dogs or cats over the age of four (4) months which are kept
application for renewal of a kennel or cattery license is considered.
D. Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, the Chief Animal Control
Officer is hereby authorized to enter upon and inspect the premises of any kennel or cattery
located in the City of Temecula for the purpose of determining whether such kennel or
cattery is in compliance with the provisions of _this Chapter and the Standards for Kennels
and Canedes. As a condition of the issuance of a kennel or cattery license, each owner and
operator d a kennel or catlevy sb~, agree to allow such entry and inspection and such
agreement shall be made a pan of the ficense appfication. Such inspections ~,n be made
during reasonable hours when the owner or operator of the kennel or cartcry is present on the
kennel or cattery premises, and with such frequency as the Chief Animal Control Officer
shall deem appropriate, and such inspections may, at the discretion of the Chief Animal
Control Officer, be made without prior notice to the owner or operator of the subject kennel
or cattery. Willful refusal on the pan of a kennel or cattery owner or operator to allow such
inspection shall be grounds for summary denial of an application for a kennel or cattery
license or for sumnaty suspension or revocation of a kennel or cattery license.
E. A nonprofit corporation formed pursuant to the provision of the California
Corporations Code commencing with Section 10400, for the prevention of cruelty to shims,Is,
shall not be required to pay a fee for the licenses requital by Section 6.02,040 A provided,
however, that all other provisions of Section 6.02,020 B and Section 6.02,040 A shall be
applicable to any such nonprofit cotpomPon.
F. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 6.02.040 C, and Section 6.(r2.050
A, a kennel or cattery which is in operation on the effective date of this Chapter and for
which on such date there is in effect a current and otherwise valid license issued prior to
OeisgS-06 6
April 4, 1987 pursuant to the provision of Riverside County Ordinance No. 455, shatl, until
April 4, 2007 be teqtdred to comply only with those requirements for licensure and openlion
G. The City Council shall adopt by Resolution standards for the operarico of all
kennels and callcries.
Section 6.02.050.
I3enin!. Supsion snd Revot'~on of Kennel or C'~ttely
license.
A. The Chief ,animal Control ~ may, in his discretion, deny any application
or suspend or revoiz any license for a lznnel or cattery if he finds that a lamnel or cattery
fails to meet any or all of the Smdards for Kennels and Catteries referred to in Section
6.02.040 C, or is in viohtion of any hw of the State of California or any provim'on of this
Chapter.
B. When such denial, suspension or revocation occurs, the Chief Animal Control
Officer shall prepare a written notice of such denial, suspension or revocstion which shall
contain a brief statement of the reason or reasons for such denial, suspension or revocation.
The Chief Animal Control Officer shah serve such notice upon the applicant or licensee by
hand delivery or by registn'~ or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requestet.
Denial, suspension or revocation shall be effective thirty (30) days after service of such
notice. Where an application for a kennel or cattery liceme is denied or where a kennel or
cattery license issued pursuant to this ordinance is suspended or revoked, no application for a
new license for such kennel or cartcry shall be considered for a period of one (1) year from
the effective date of such denial, suspension or revocation; provided, however, that for good
cause shown the City Council may direct that there be a lesser period of time before such
application will be considered.
C. Any person whose application has been denied or whose license has been
suspended or revoked, may appeal such denial, suspension or revocation by filing with the
City Clerk within fifteen (15) days after notice of such denial, suspension or revocation, a
written notice of appeal briefly setting forth the reasons why the appellant alleges such
denial, suspension or revocation is impwper. Within five (5) days of the receipt by the City
Clerk of such notice of appeal, the Cierk shall set a hearing date for the appeal and shall give
written notice of the date, time and place of such hearing to the appellant, and such notice
shall be sent by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested. The
date of heating shall be not less than twenty (20) days from the date of mailing of the notice
of the date, time and place of the hearing, and the hearings shall be conducted not later than
forty-five (45) days from the date of mailing of the notice of denial, suspension or
revocation; pwvided, however, that at the request of the appellant, the City Clerk may
Ords~-0~ 7
technical rules w, lating to evidence and wimesses, as applicable in courts of hw. To be
~dmi.~sible, evidence shall be of the type upon which respondble persons are accustomed to
rely in the conduct of serious affairs. During the peudeucy of the appeal, there shall be in
effect an automatic my of the denial, suspeusiou or revocation; provided, however, that
during said period of peadency the Chief Anhual Control Officer may take such action as he
deems appzop, late uuder this Chapter or any other provisiou of law resl~g the subject
kennel or cattery, including but not limited to the abatement of public nuisances, inspection
of the kennel or cartcry 1~, or the vfosex:tlou of any violation of this Chapter or any
other provision of law not related to the failure of the subject kennel or cattery to be
currently and otherwi~ validly liceused.
Section 6.020.060. Animnl Rescuer.
A. Any Ira'son eu~aged in the xescue of animHm, mh.n first obtain a rescue pemit
from Chief Animal Control Ofcer and shall meet all nmquimnmUs for a kenneYcattery
license.
B. The fee for a keuncl/cattcry permit as a zescue facility shall be as set by City-.
Council Resolution adopted fonowing a public hearing noticed as required by Slate Law:
C. An animal rescuer my ]zep a maximum of four (4) personal (not for adoption
or sale) dogs and nine (9) personal (not for adoption or sale) cats and must include these
animals as "pcrson~ pets' on the animal rescue permit application. In those cases where the
person occupies from .5 to 1 acre, up to 6 dogs may be kept on the lxemimes.
D. Personal dogs (not for adoption or sale) shall be individually liceused in
accordance with this Chapter.
E. A permitted rescuer obtaining animals from a shelter facility pursuant to
Section 6.02.100 O shall not be subjea to the payment of impound fees and charges specified
in Section 6.02.100 A but shall be subject to the spay/neuter deposit specified in Section
6.02.110 A.
F. All rescued dogs and rescued cam older than four (4) months must be
spayed/neutcred prior to ~L~-,ing to an adopting patty. In any event the animal must be
altered within 30 days of receipt by the rescuer.
O. Accurate and conlplete records of all =.imnlm shall be maintained by the
animal rescuer on forms which will be wade available to Chief Animal Control Of Bcer for
inspection upon request.
reh2d to the ~t of i.-_~ or injury.
L Admini-~-ation of the animal rescue program shnl! be the responsibility of the
Chief Animal Control Officer who shall have the authority to issue and revok~ animal rescue
Section 6.02.070. I')uties sund Powers of Officers.
A. It shall be the duty of all peace officen to cooperate with and assist the Chief Animal
Control Officer in the enforcement of the provisions of this Chapter, and such peace officers
and the Chief Animal Control Officer shall be empowered to:
1. Receive, take up and impound:
a. Any dog found rdnning at large in violation of this chapter or of
any hw of the State of California;
Any dog which, without provocation or direction, is molesting:
any person; and
c. Any dog which, without provocation or direction, is molesting
or harassing animals, birds, or pets upon the premises of any person.
2. Regularly and adequately feed, water and otherwise care for all dogs
and cats impounded under the provisions of this ordinance, or to provide for such feeding,
watering and care.
3. Investigate the condition and behavior of any dog or cat which he has
reason to believe is vicious or dangerous and if he finds such dog or cat to be vicious or
dangerous in its habits, he shall report his findings in writing, either by hand-delivery or by
mail, to the owner of such dog or cat if the name and whereabouts of said owners are
known, and if unknown, then the dog or cat shall be impounded.
4. Follow the provisions of Ctmpt~r 6.04 in humanely destroying or giving
emergency care to sick or injured dogs and cats.
Unless otherwise prohibited by hw, all persons whose duty it is to enforce the
provisions of this Chapter are hereby empowered to enter upon private property, where any
dog or cat is kept or reasonably believed to be kept, for the purpose of ascerminhg whether
0t~95-0~ 9
such dog or cat is lc~ in violation of any provision of ~ chapter. Notwithstanding any
provision in this Clapta relating m entry upon private propc=~y for any ~,uq. as~ under this
~, no suc, h entry may be conducted: (a) without the npzss or implied consent of the
pminty owner or the penon laving lawful possession thez~of, or Co) unless an inspection
wanant has been issued and the entry is conducted in accordance with California Code of
Ovil Procedure, Sections 1822..50 through 1822.56, inclusive, or (c) except as may
otherwise be expressly or implied permitted by law.
Section 6.02.090. r~ogs Running At T sWe.
In the interest of public safety, it shall be hwful for any person to take up, in
a humane manner, any dog nmning at large in violation of this Chapter and promptly to
deliver such dog to the Chief Animal Control Officer. .-
Section 6.02.100~ Impounded r)o[,s and Cats.
A. An impounded dog or cat may be redeemed upon payment as set pursuant to
City Council Resolution adopted following a public hearing noticed as required punuant to
State Law.
B. The fee for destruction and disposal of any dog or cat in accordance with any ..
provision of this Chapter, shall be as set pursuant to City Council Resolution adopted
following a public hearing noticed as required pursuant to State Law.
C. Any dog, four (4) months of age or older, which has been impounded shall not
be released from impoundment unless it is licensed in accordance with the provisions of this
Chapter.
D. Any officer acting under the provisions of this Chapter and impounding a
licensed dog pursuant to Section 6.02.070 A, 1, 2 or 3 or a licensed cat, shall give written
notice by tint class mail, postage prepaid, to the last known address of the owner, of the
impounding of such dog or cat. If such dog or cat is not redeemed within ten (10) days from
the date of the mailing of such notice, the officer having custody of the dog or cat sb~ll
dispose of it in accordance with the provisions of Section 6.02.100 G, or shall destroy such
dog or cat.
E. Upon impounding an unlicensed dog pursuant to Section 6.02.070 A. or an
unlicensed cat, the officer shall give notice to the owner, ff the owner and his whereabouts
are known, of the impounding of such dog or cat. ff such dog or cat has not been redeemed
within five (5) days of the giving of such notice, the officer shall dispose of such dog or cat
in accordance with the provisions of Section 6.02,100 G, or shall destroy such dog or cat.
For the purpose of this notice specified herein shall be given in the manner determined by
o~s 95o6 1o
F. The off~:er hayinS custody of any impounded dog or cat may, by humane
methods, summarily destroy such dog or cat if:.
1. The dog or cat is suffering from any incurable, dangerous or
contagious disease, providing a veterinarian shall certify, in writing, that such dog or cat is
so suffering; or,
G. Any ofiizr having his cusiody any ~edeemed, impounded dog or cat my
release such dog or cat to any adult individual upon payment by the individual of the
impound fees and charges specified in Seelien 6.02,100 A, and the spay/nenter deposit fee
~ in Section 6.02.110 A or to a nonprofit corponttion formed under the provisions of
the California Corporations Code commencing with Section 10400 for the prevention of
cruelty to Snimlds or to a nonprofit org~nir-~tlon formed under the hws of the State of
California for the prevention of czuelty to animals, for such sale or placement as such
nonprofit corporation or nonprofit orL, sni,stion may choose. lzele~.ws of dogs and cats to
such nonprofit corporations or nonprofit organizations pursuant to Section 6.02.110 G shall
not be subject to the payment of the impound fees and charges specified in Section 6.02.100
A, but shall be subject to the spay/neut~r deposit specified in Section 6.02.110 A.
H. It shall be unlawful for any person to remove an impounded animal from an
animal control center without permission of the officer in charge thereof.
Section 6.02.110. ~pay/Neuter Deposits for Dolls and Cats.
No person shall be permitted to adopt or purchase any dog or cat which has not been
spayed or neutered, from any public pound, any animal shelter, society or organization,
unless and until a deposit has been paid in the mount set by City Council Resolution.
Section 6.02.120. Vicious r~oi, s and f~ts. and Stray and P-~rklnll rlolls.
A. It shall be unlawful for the owner or person in charge of any vicious dog or
vicious cat to fail, neglect, or refuse to ~ posted in a conspicuous place at or near the
entrance to the premises on or within which such dog or cat is kept, a sign having lettn~ at
least two (2) inches in width and two (2) inches in height and reading "Beware of Vicious
Dog" or "Beware of Vicious Cat", as may be ayl~mpdate. No vicious dog or vicious cat
shall be permitted to leave the premises of the owner or person in charge thereof unless such
dog or cat is under the immediate control and physical restraint of such owner or person and
in the case of a vicious dog, such dog shall be m-~led.
B. If is shall be determined by the Chief Animal Control Officer that a dog or cat
is a vicious dog or cat but is not acted with rabies, the Chief Animal Control Officer shall
thereupon order the person who owns or has custody of such dog or cat that until further
Ords 95-06 ll
to comply with any order of the Chief Animal Control Officer mad~ pursuant to thi~
subsection, on the part of the owner or person having custody of the dog or cat which is the
subject of such order, shall constime a violation of this Clmptcr.
C. It shall be unlawful for the owner or person in charge of any dog, whether
licensed or unlicensed, to permit such dog to run at large.
D. It shall be unlawful for any person to keep or allow to be kept, or suffer or
permit any dog to remain upon the premises under the control of such person, when such
dog habitually bath, whines or males loud or unusual noises in such a manner as to disturb ..
the pesc~ and quiet of the neighbors surrounding or in the vicinity of such premises, or
whose barking or howling or other sound or cry interferes with any person of ordinary
sensitivity in the reasonable comfortable enjoyment of life and prolx~ ty.
E. It shall be unlawful for any person to set or maintain an openling trap for a
cat unless a sign is posted on the lax, l/=tty stating that such trap is in use on the property.
The sign shall be clearly vi_~ble from the road serving the property on which the trap is set -.
or maintained and shall remain posted and vi~htc at all times while the trap is in use.
Trapping shall not continue for more than ten (10) days in a thirty (30) day period. This
section shah not apply when the trap is being used for rabies control as determined in writing
by the Chief Animal Control Officer.
Section 6.02.130. l~ahies ~qppression. Control and Qpanntine.
A. ff it shall appear to the Chief Animal Control Officer that any animal has
rabies, the Chief Animal Control Officer may destroy such animal forthwith, or may hold
such animal for further examination or observation for such time as the Chief Animal
Control Officer my determine to be approF, Late.
B. Whencver any animal has bccn bitten by an animal which has rabies, which
exhibits any symptoms of rabies or which is otherwise suspected of having or having been
exposed to rabics, thc owner or lx~on having custody of such bitten animal shall
immediately notify the Chief Animal Control Officer, and shall immediately confine the
animal and maintain that ¢on~necnent until it is eatab~ to tl~ ~tisfae-tlon of tig Chief
Officer shall have the power to qtlarantinc any such animal, or ilnpound it at the owncr*s
in the opinion of the Chief Animal Control Officer, to adequately confine such animal
immediately, or in the event the owner or person having custody of such animal is not
readily accessible.
Officer quarantine such animal and ka~ it confined at the owner's expense for a minimum
period of ten (10) days for dogs and cats and fourteen (14) days for all other anirnsd-% and
sban allow the Chief Animal Control Offi~ to mains an inspection or examination of such
animal at any time during such period of quarantine. ~nimal,q quarantined pursuant to ~
subsection shall not be removed from the premises upon which such animal is quarantined
without permission of the Chief Animal Control Offxcer. The Chief Animal Control Officer
is hereby authorized to impound any animal at the owner's expense in the event the owner or
person having custody of such animal fails or refuses to so confine such animal. Animals
quarantined pursuant to this subsection shall remain under quarantine until notice is given by
the Chief Animal Control Officer that such quarantine is terminated.
D. The Chief Animal Control Officer may, in his discretion, post or cause to be
posted an appropriate sign on any premises where an animal is quarantined pursuant to this
Chapter, for the purpose of warning the public of the fact of such quarantine. It ShRll be
unlawful for any person to remove a sign on any premises where an animal is quarantined
pursuant to this Chapter, for the purpose of warning the public of the fact of such quarantine.
It shall be unlawful for any person to remove a sign posted pursuant to this subsection
without the permission of the Chief Animal Contwl Officer.
E. Whenever the Chief Animal Control ~ shall determine that an epidemic
of rabies exists or is threatened, the Chief Animal Control Offtea' shall have the authority to
take such measures as my be reasonably necessary to prevent the spread of the disease,
including but not limited to the d~laration of quarantine against any or all aniw~l-~ in any
area of the City of Temecula as the Chief Animal Conlxol Officer may determine and define,
for a period of not more than one hundred and twenty (120) days. An additional or extended
quarantine period may also be declared ff such additional or extended quarantine period shall
be deemed necessary by the Chief Animal Control Officer for the protection and presezvation
of the public health, peace and safety. Any quarantine decbred pursuant to this subsection,
other than as restricted herein, shall be upon such conditions as the Chief Animal Control
Officer may determine and declare.
F. No person shall bring a dog into the City of Temecula from any city located in
the County of Riverside in which a reported case of rabies exist or has existed within the
past six (6) months, nor shall any person bring a dog into the City of Temecula from any
county, city, state or country in which a reported case of rabies exists or has existed within
the preceding six months.
G. In order to protect the public health from the hazard of mbie~ which has been
found to exist in shutks, a quarantine is hereby imposed to continue until teleased by the
Chid Animal Control Officer, whereby it is prohibited to trap or capture skunks for pets; to
trap, capture, or hold skunks in captivity for any reason; to Wansport skunks from or into the
City of Temecula except pursuant to a permit issued by the California DeparUnent of Health
Ords 95-06 13
Se~:~s puxsu~t to Title ]7, Califoxnia Admini-erafiv~ C. od~, Sex:fion 2606.8,
R~-tion 6.09.140. Plm'~nent Reqllirement.
A. Any person or bu~ness eNity or other org~nir~tlon located in or doing
business in the City of Temecuia, which,
1. advertises or often in any manner, puppies or dogs for:.
a. sale, or
b. trade, or
c.. batter, or
d. to be given away for free
2. Must di~lay in such adverti-~ernents the following information:
the license number and name of the lice~,~ing agency of each of
the mother shimsis any of whose offspring are so offered Cm the
case of puppies under four months of age), and/or
the lmnnel and or rescue permit number and name of the
permitting agency of the owner of each of the mother .him.is
any of whose offspring are so offered (in the case of puppies
under four months of age), and/or
the lnmel permit and/or rescue number and name of the
permitting agency of the owner of each of the dogs so offered
(in the case of animals four months or more of age).
B. This Section shall not apply to public nnimsls shelters or non-profit humane
societies which are in compliance with Food and Agricultural Code Sections 30503 and
3175 1, nor shah it apply to persons who relinquish animals to such shelters or soleties.
C. A viohtion of this Section shall be puni.~hsble as follows:
1. For a first time violation, the owner shall be subject to a $50.00 fine.
a. This fine may be waived and the citation 61smist~'d if within 30
days after receiving the citation the party has had the mother animal spayed and has provided
proof of the spaying the County Animal Control
2. For a second violation, the owner shall be subject to a $100.00 fine.
a. $50.00 of the fine my be waived if within 30 days after
Orsis 95416 14
after recei~ the citation the party has provided proof of spaying to County Animal
Control.
For any subsequent vioh~on, the owner shall be subject to a $200.00
a. $50.00 of the fine may be waived if within 30 days after
receiving the citation the party has had the mother animal spayed and has provided proof of
the spaying to County Animal Control.
4. Viohtors are subject to citation and are to be furnished with a list of
low-cost or no-cost spay and neuter resources.
5. It shall be unlawful for any person to malz use of a stolen, counterfeit
or unauthorized license, lag, certificate or any other document or thing for the purpose of
evading the provisions of thi~ section.
6. Fifty percent of all fees collected pursuant to this Section may be used
for the general cost of Chief Animal Control Officer. The remaining fifty percent of nil such
fees shall be placed in a separate fund to be used exclusively for low-cost spay and neuter
services and education related to the benefits of spaying and neutering.
Section 6.(P., 140.
Prohibition of .~nles or the C, iving Away of Do~s nnd
Cn~ on Public ~.
No person in the City shall offer for sale or sell or give away or transfer for
adoption any cat, kitten, dog or puppy on any public street, public sidewalk or public park.
Section 6.02.150. F. nforcement.
A. The Chief Animal Control Officer shah supervise the ndministration and
enforcement of this Chapter and of the laws of the State of California pertaining to the
control of dogs and shall have charge of animal control center employees and facilities.
B. The City Council may enter into a written agreement or agreements with any
veterinarian or any organized humane society or association, which will undertalz to carry
out the provisions of ~is Chapter and mainlain and operate a pound, and which will licenm,
talz up, impound and dispose of ~nim~ls. Any such vettl'inarian or society or association
which shall enter into such an agreement shatl carry-out all of the provisions of this Cbn,nter
in the manner herein prescribed.
C. It shall be unlawful for any person to interfere with, oppose or resist any
officer or tin'son mnpowemi to enfor~ the provisimm of this Chap~ while such officer or
person is engaged in the pafo,~ance of his duties as provided hewn:
D. Nothing in this ordinnnce shall prevent the Chief Animal Control Officer from
acting, when he deems it approl~iate to do so, under the applicable pwvisions of C. allfomia
Penal Code, Seaion 597, et. till.
Section 6.02.160. Violation.
Any penon viohting any of the provisions d this Chapter shnll be guilty of an
infraction and upon conviction thereof shall be punished by (1) a fine not exceeding fifty
dollars 650.00) for the first viohfion; (2) a fine not exceeding one hundred dollars ($100.00)
for the second violation within one (1) year;, (3) a fine not exceeding two hundred and fifty
dollars ($250.00) for each additional viohfion within (1) year. Each day a viohfion is
committed or permitted to continue shall constitute a separate offense.
Section 6.02.180. RecoUpment of F. nforcement Costs.
The intent of this Section is to authorize the recoupment of administrative costs
reasonably related to the enforcement of this Chapter. In furtherance of this intent the City:
shall be enfified to recover costs of enforcement, including costs of staff lime, by complying'
with the following procedure:
A. Records of Costs. The Chief Animal Control Officer or his designee shall
maintain records of all ncJministrative costs itwutred in the processing of the violation or
viohtions and the enforcement of this Chapter and other applicable Chapters and may
recover such costs from the viohtor and/or propcity owner or propc, ty occupier as provided
herein.
B. Notice. Upon investigation and determination that a violation of any of the
pwvisions of this Chapter or other related City Ordinances is found to exist, the Chief
Animal Control Officer or his designee shall notify the viohtor and/or record owner of the
property or any person having possession or control of the subject pwperty, by mail of the
existence of the vioh~on, of his intent to charge the violator and/or pwlP-,ny owner and/or
person having possession or control of the propctty for all administrative costs assochted
with enforcement, and of the respondent's fight to a hearing on objections thereto. The
notice shah be in substantially the following form:
NOTICB
The Chief Animal Contwl Officer of the City of Temecula has/have
determined that conditions exist at the propa~y located at
which violate Section (s)
Mtmicil~! Code Section
towit:
of the Temecuh
Notice is hereby given that at the conclusion of this case you will receive a
summary of admini,~z-ative eosts associated with the processing of such
viohfions(s).
You will have the right to object to these charges by filing a Request for
Hearing with the Chief Animal Control Officer within ten (10) days of service
of the Summary of Charges.
C. Summsllr of Charges. At the conclusion of the case, Chid Animal Control
Officer shall send a Summary of Charges associated with enforcement to the viohtor and/or
owner of the ~ and/or person having possession or control of the subject Ftopcaty by
certified mail. The Summary shall include a notice in substantially the following form:
/ NOTICE
If you object to these charges, you must file a Request for Hearing on the
enclosed Form within ten (10) days of the date of this notice.
IF YOU FAIL TO TIMelY REQUF, ST A HEARING, YOUR
RIGHT TO OBIECT WH ,L BB WAIVED AND YOU WILL
BE LIABLE TO THE CITY OF TEMECUIA FOR THESE
CHARGES, TO BE RECOVERED IN A CIVIL ACTION IN
THE NAME OF THE CITY IN ANY COURT OF
COMPETENT IURISDICTION WITHIN THE COUNTY.
Dated:
Chief Animal Control Officer
City of Ternecula
Ords 95-06 17
D. l~il, ht to H~rinl. Any violator or pfoputy owner, or other person having
possession and control of the propca ty,-who receives a Summary of Charges under this
section shall have the right to a he~ring before the Chief Animal Control Offwet or his
designee on his objection to the proposed costs in accordance with the procedures set forth
herein.
E. ReqUest for H~rinl,. A request for hearing shall be filed with the Chief
Animal Control Offget within ten (10) days of the service by mail of the Summary of
Charges. Within thirty (30) days of the filing of the request, and on ten (10) days notice to
the viohtor or owner, Chief Animal Control Offxcer or his desi~nee shall hold a hearing on
the viohtor's and/or owner's objections and shall determine the validity thereof.
F. Recovet3r of Cost-~. In the event that (a) no Request for Hearing is timely filed '-
or Co) after a hearing in which the Chid Animal Control Officer or his designee aftinns the
validity of the charges, the viohtor, the prol~ty owner or person in control and possession
of the propet ty Shill be liable to the City in the mount stated in the Summary of Charges or
any lesser mount as determined by the Chief Animal Control Officer or his designce. These
Charges shall be recoverable in a civil action in the name of the City, in any court of
competent jurisdiction within the County.
G. Of~cer's Decision. In determining the validity of the Charges, the Chief
Animal Control Officer or his designee shall consider whether the total charges have been
fairly and accurately calculated. Factors to be considered include whether the time and
personnel spent in enforcement were reasonably ~necessary to bring about compliance.
H. ADDgtl. The decisions of the Chief Animal Control Officer or his designee
may be appealed by filing a written Notice of Appeal with the Chief Animal Control Officer
within five (5) days after the decision. The appeal shall be heard by the City Council which
may affirm, amend or reverse the decision and may take any other action deemed
appropriate. The Chid Animal Control Of~cer sbs~ ~ive written notice of the time and
place of the hearing.
Section 6.02.190. Public Nui.~nce.
A. The possession or maintenance of any dog or cat or the allowing of any dog or
cat to be in violation of this Chapter, in addition to being a violation of this Chapter, is
hereby declared to be a public nuisance. The Chief Animal Control Officer and any City
pes:~ officer are hereby directed and empowered to sxsmm~rily abate any such public
nuisance independen~y or any criminal prosecution or the results thereof, by any means
reasonably n~ry to accomplish said abatement including but not limited to the
destruction of the dog or cat involved, or by the imposition of specific reasonable conditions
and restrictions for the maintenance of such dog or cat. Failure to comply with such
conditions and restrictions is a misdemeanor. The owner of such dog or cat shall reimburse
Otdl 95-O6
the City of Temecula for all costs incurred in enforcing compliance with the provisions of
_this Seaion. The City of Temecula, by and through the Chief Animal Control Officer, may
also commence and maintain such proce~ings in a court of competent jurisdiction as are
apyropihte under the hws and regulations of the State of California for the abatement and
redress of public nuisances.
B. At least ten (10) working days prior to the impmmdment or abatement or both
pursuant to Section 6.02.190 A, the owner or custodian of the subjea dog or cat shah be
notified by the Chief Animal Control Officer, in wriling, of the right to a he~ing to
determine whether grounds exist for such impoundme~t or abatement or, where applicable,
both. Said notice shall be served by hand-delivery or by registered or certified mail, postage
prepaid, remm receipt requested. If the owner or custodian requests a hearing prior to
impoundment or abatement, no impoundment or abatement shall take place until the
conclusion of such hearing, except as provided in Section 6.02.190 C.
C. When, in the opinion of the Chief Animal Control Officer, immediate
impoundment is necesssry for the lreservafion of animal or public health, safet~ or welfare,
or if the subject dog or cat has been impounded under any other provision of this Chapter or
any hw or reguhtion of the State of California, the pre-impoundment hearing shall be
deemed waived; provided, however, that the owner or custodian of the subject dog or cat
shah be given notice by the Chief Animal Control Officer, in writing, which would allow :
five (5) working days to request an abatement hearing. Service of such notice shall be in
accordance with the service methods specified in Section 6.02.190 B. Where requested by
such owner or custodian, a heating sbnll be held within five (5) days of the request therefor,
and the subject dog or cat shall not be disposed of prior to the conclusion of the hearing. If,
after five (5) working days from the date of service of the notice specified in this Section
6.02,190 C, no request for a heating is received from the owner or custodian of the subject
dog or cat, such dog or cat shall be disposed of pursuant to applicable provisions of hw.
D. All hearings pursuant to this Section shall be conducted by the Chief Animal
Control Officer personally or by a desiL'nsted employee who shall not have been directly
involved in the subject action. Hearings shall be held not more than ten (10) days from the
date of receipt of the request for the hearing and shall be conducted in an informal manner
consistent with due process of law. A heating may be continued for a reasonable period of
time if the Chief Animal Control Officer deems such continuance to be necessary and propa
or if the owner or custodian shows good cause for such continuance. Within (10) days after
the conclusion of the hearing, the Chief Animal Contwl Officer shall render, in writing, his
findings, decisions and order thereon and shall give notice of said findings, decision and
order to the owner or custodian of the subjea dog or cat; service of such notice shall be in
accordance with the service methods specifiai in Section 6.02.190 B.
Section 3. Chapter 6.06 of the Temecula Code is revised in its entirety to read is
follows:
0tds 95-06 19
"t~pter 6.06
Fnilure to t~re for nnim:als
6.06.020. T~ty to f'~re for Animnls.
and attention is guilty of a mi~e~.~mor. The Chief Animal Control Officer shall tnk~
possession of the stray or abandoned animal and shall provide care and tnmtmeat for the
When the officer has reasonable grounds to believe that very prompt action is required in
protect the health or safety of the animal and othen, the ~ shall immedintely seize the
animal and comply with Section 6.08.070. In all other cases, the Officer shall comply with
the provisions of Section 6.08.080. The cost of caring for and treating any animal properly
seized under this subdivision shall constituZ it Hen on the animal and the animal shall not be
returned to its owner until the charges are paid, ff the seizure is upheld pursuant m this
6.06.030 Treatment of Str~ nnd Injured Animals.
Every sick, disabled, injured, or crippled nnim~ul, except a dog or cat, which is
abandoned in the City, may be killed by the Chief Animal Control Officer if, after
reasonable search, no owner of the animal can be found. It shall be the duty of the Chief
Animal Control Officer to cause the animal to be killed or rehabilitatc~d and placed in a
suitable home on information that the animal is stray or abandoned. The Offxeer may
lil~wise talz charge of any animal, including a dog or cat, that by reason of lnmeness,
sickness, feebleness, or neglect, is unfit for the labor it is performing, or that in any other
manner is being cruelly treated, and provide care and treatment for the animal until it is
deemed to be in a suitable condition to be tW. trned to the owner. When the Officer has
reasonable grounds to believe that very prompt action is required to protect the health or
safety of an animal or the health or safety of othen, the officer shah immediately seizethe
animal and comply with Section 6.08.070. In all other cases, the Officer shah comply with
Section 6.08.080. The cost of caring for and treating any animal properly seized under this
Section shall constitute a lien on the animal and the animal shall not be returned to its owner
until the charges are paid.
6.06.040 C~re ofltljured Animsls.
A. The Chief Animal Control Officer shall convey nil injured cats and
dogs found without their owners in a public place directly to a vetn'inarian known by the
officer to be a veterinnrian who ordinarily treats dogs and cats for a determination of whether
the animal shah be immedistely and humanely destroyed or shall be hospitalized under
proper care and given emergency treatmenL
Oeds 95-436 2O
to mkc possession of the animal.
C. Whenever any animalis tmnsfen~ to a vetetinazian in a clinic, such
~ds an emergency clinic, which is not in continuous operation, the veterinarian may, in ram,
D. If the veterinnrian determines that the animal shall be hospimlized under
the proper care and given emergency treatment, the corn of any services which are provided
pending the owner's inquiry to the Chief Animal Control Officer or local humane society
shall be paid from the dog license fees, fines, and fees for impounding dogs in the City,
subject to the provision that this cost be repaid by the animal's owner. The cost of caring
for and treating any animal seized under this Section shall constitute a lien on the animal and
the animal shah not be returned to the owner until the charges are paid. No veterinarian
shall be criminatly or civilly liable for any decision which he or she makes or for services
which he or she provides pursuant to this Section.
6.06.050. Records of Handling of Sm~v and Injured Animals.
When Chief Animal Control Officer takes possession of an animal pursuant to
Section 6.08.040, he shall keep records of the whereabouts of the animal for 72-hour period
from the time of possession, and those records shall be available for inspection by the public
upon request in the field in any case where the animal is too severely injured to move or
where a veterinarian is not available and it would be more humane to dispose of the animal.
6.06.060. HumAne Destruction of Severely Ir0ured AnimAls.
NotwithsUmding any other provisions of this Chapter the Chief Animal Control
Officer my humanely destroy any stray or abandoned animal in the field in any case where
the animal is too severely injured to move or where a veterinarian is not available and it
would be move humane to dispose of the animal.
6.06.070. Post-seizure Hi. ratings.
A. Whenever the Chief Animal Control Officer seizes or impounds an
animal based on a reasonable belief that prompt action is required to protect the health and
safety of the animal or the health or safety of othen, the Offxcer sixall, prior to the
commencement of any criminal proceedings authorized by this Chapter, provide the owner or
keeper of the animal, if known or ascertainable after reasonable investigation, with the
opporUmity for a postseizure hearing to determine the validity of the seizure or impoundment
orbotho
Onis 9506 11
B. TheChiefAnimalControl~shallcauseanoticetobeaffixedto
a conspieuons place where the animal was sltt,=ted or personany deliver a notice of the
seizure or impoendment, or both, to the owner or keeper within 48 houn, excluding
weekends and holidays. The notice shall include all of the following:
1. The name, b,:~ness address and telephone number of the Chief
Animal Control Officer.
A description of the animal seized, including any identification
upon the animal.
The authority and purpose for the seizure, or impoundment,
including the time, place and circumstances under which the
A s~tement that, in order to receive a postseintte hearing, the
owner or person authorized to keep the animal, or his or her
agent, shah request the hearing by signing and returning an
enclosed declaration of ownership or fight to keep the animal to
the Chief Animal Control Officer within 10 days, including
wee-h~ds and holidays, of the date of the notice. The ~
declaration may be returned by personal delivery or mail.
A statement that the cost of eating for and treating any animal
properly seized under this Chapter is a lien on the animal and
that the animal shall not be returned to the owner until the
charges are paid, and that failure to request or to attend a
scheduled hearing shall result in liability for this cost.
C. The postseizure hearing shall be conducted within 48 hours of the
request excluding week~ds and holidays. The City Manager shall ~ondua the hearing.
D. Failure of the owner or keeper, or of his or her agent, to request or to
attend a scheduled hearing shall result in a forfeiture of any fight to a postaeizure hearing or
fight to challenge his or her liability for cost incurred.
E. The City shall be responsible for the costs incurred for caring and
treating the nnimnl, if it iS determined in the postseiztlre heating that the Chief Animal
Control Officer did not have reasonable grounds m believe very prompt ac'tion, including
or safety of others. If it is determined the seizure and care of the :;nlm=!, the charges for the
seizure was justified, the owner or izeper shall be personally liable to the City and care of
the animal shall be a lien on the animal, and the animal shall not be returned to its owner
until the charges are paid and the City Manager has determined that the animal is physically
A. Where the need for immPdi~te seizure is not present and prior to the
commencement of any criminal proceedings authorized by this Chapter, the Chief Animal
Control ~ shall provide the owner or lappet of the animal, if known or ~le
after reasonable investigation, with the opportunity for a hearing prior to any seizure or
im~undment of the animal. The owner shall produce the animal at the time of the heating
unless, prior to the hearing, the owner has made axrangements with the Chief Aninml
Control Officer to view the animal upon request of the Chief Animal Control Officer, or
unless the owner can provide verification that the animal washumandy destroyed. Any
person who willfully fails to produce the animal or provide the verification is guilty of an
infraction, punishable by a fine of not less that two hundred fifty dollars ($250) nor more
than one thousand dollan ($1,000).
B. The Chief Animal Control Officer shall cause a notice to be affixed to
a conspicuous place where the animal was situated or personally deliver a notice stating the
grounds for believing the animal should be seized under Sections 6.08.020 or 6.08,030. The
notice shall include all of the following:
The name, business address, and telephone number of the Chief Animal
Control Officer.
A description of the animal to be seized, including any
identification upon the animal.
The authority and purpose for the possible seizure or
impoundment.
A statement that, in order to receive a hearing prior to any
seizure, the owner or person authorize! to keep the animal, or
his or her agent, shall request the hearing by signing and
retunting the enclosed declaration of ownership or fight to izep
the animal to the of~cer pwviding the notice within two days,
excluding weekends and holidays, of the date of the notice.
A statement that the cost of caring for and treating any animal
properly seized under this section is a lien on the Sunimsd, that
any animal seized shall not be returned to the owner until the
charges ate paid, and that failure to request or to attend a
scheduled hearing shall re. suit in a conclusive determination that
onls 95-06
C. The ~eseizure heating shall be conducted within 48 hours, excluding
w~.lc~cls and holidays, a~er receipt of the request. The City Manager shall conduct the
hearing.
D. Failure of the owner or izeper, or his or her agent, to request or to
attend a scheduled he~ring shall result in a forfeiture of any fight to a preseizu~ hearing or
right to challenge his or her lln_hility for COSt incurred pursuant to this section.
E. The City Manager, after the heating, my affirm or deny the owner's
or keeper's fight to custody of the animal and, if reasonable grounds are established, may
order the seizure or impoundment of the animal for care and treatment.
6.06.090. Cost of ImZ~oundment: Bestruction of Impounded Animals.
animal. Furthermore, if the charges for the seizure or impoundment and any other charges
permitted under this Chapter are not paid within 14 days of the seizure, or, if the owner,
within 14 days of notice of availability of the animal to be returned, fails to pay charges
permitted under this Chapter and tak~ possession of the animal, the animal shall be deemed
to have been abandoned and may be disposed of by the Chief Animal Control Officer.
B. A veterinarian may humanely destroy an impounded animal without
regard to the prescribed holding period when it has been determined that the animal has
incurred severe injuries or is incurably crippled. A veterinarian also may immediately
humanely destroy an impoundment animal afflicted with a serious contagious disease unless
the owner or his or her agent immediately authorizes treatment of the animal by a
veterinarian at the expense of the owner or agent
6.06.170. r}iSl~ositien of Sei~ured Anim~,ls.
Upon the conviction of a person charged with a violation of this Chapter, all
~nim~ls lawfully seized and impounded with respect to the violation shall be adjudged by the
for proper disposition. A person convicted of a violation of this Chapter shall be personally
liable to the City for all costs of impoundment from the time of seizure to the time of proper
disposition. This Chapter shall not prohibit the seizure or impoundment of animals as
evidence as provided for under any other provision of law.'
Sec~on 4.
follows:
Chapter 6.08 is added to the Temecula Municipal Code to read as
Prohibition of ehc Runnin~ st 1 ~We of r~omes~c Fowls or
r~omestic Animals other than r:ogs or Cats and providing for
Their Inlpounding.
Section 6.08.010. r~nitions. Whenever in this Chapter the words herein
defined are used they shall have the respective meanings assigned to them in the following
definitions:
A. "Animal* means any domestic bovine animal, horse, mule, burro, sheep, goat,
swine or other domestic animal except a dog or cat.
B. "Fowl* means any chicken, duck, turkey goose or other domestic fowl.
C. "Chief Animal Control Officer" means the Chief Animal Control Officer of
the City of Temecula or his designated representative.
D. "At large' means off the premises of, and not under physical restraint, by, the
owner or other person having charge of an animal.
Section 6.08.020. Animals or Fowls ~t I ~e Prohibited.
No person owning or having charge of any animal or fowl shall permit th~
same to be at large on any highway, street, sidewalk, lane, alley or other public place, or
upon any private property other than that of the person owning or having charge of such
animal or fowl _unless such owner or person having charge of such animal or fowl has the
consent of the owner of the private property.
Section 6.08.030. F-xemption. This Chapter shall not pwhibit leading,
driving, riding or conducting animals under adequate supervision along a public highway.
Section 6.08.040. Impounding Animals. Subject to the provisions contained
in Section 6.08.150, it shall be the duty of the Chief Animal Control Officer to tak= up and
impound all animals found at large upon any highway, street, sidew~lic, lane, alley or other
public place, or upon any private property. The Chief Animal Control Officer may contract
with any person to keep, feed and care for any such animal at reasonable rates for not more
than 20days.
Section 6.08.050. r}i~position of Animals. l~ahid or rgsahled.
ff it 8h:~11 appear to the Chief Animal Control Officer from the report of a
Licensed veterinarian or other qualified person that an animal i~ affli~d with rabies, be shall
humanely destroy such animal, and shall tak~ such other action as may be required by law
ouls 95-06 21
and as he deems neces,~ry to prevent the spread of such disease. He may humanely destroy
any sick, disabled, infirm or crippled animal found at large if he is unable to identify and
locate the owner.
,~ecti on 6.08.060.nitposition of P6vine Animnl s. Horses, Mules or
P, urfows.
If the Chief Animal Control Officer impounds any bovine nnimSlS, horse,
mule, or burro, and if such animal is not reclaimed within 5 days thereafcer, the Chief
Animal Control Officer shall notify the State Director of Agriculture in accordance with the
provisions of Agricultural Code Section 17003. If the Director of Agricul~ does not,
within 5 days after notice, elect to dispose of any horse, mule, or burro, then the Chief
Animal Contwl Officer shall sell such animal in accordance with this Chapter.
Section 6.08.070. r~i~position of Other Animnls.
If any animal other than a domestic bovine animal, horse, mule, or burro, and
except an animal afflicted with rabies, impounded by the Chief Animal Control Officer, is
not reclaimed within 2 days thereafter, it shall he sold by the Chief Animal Control Officer
after giving notice of sale in accordance with 6.08,080.
Section 6.08.080. Notice of Sale. The notice of sale sbnll contain a
description of the animal, including any identifying marks or brands; the date and place
where the animal was taken up; and the time and place of sale. At least 5 days prior to the
sale of any impounded animal, the Chief Animal Control Officer shall cause a copy of the
notice to he published in a newspaper circulated in the area where the animal was found, and
shall mail a copy of the notice to the owner or person entitled to possession of the animal at
his residence or place of business, if known.
Section 6.08.090. Snle of Animals. At the time and place set forth in the
notice of sale, the Chief Animal Control Officer shall sell the impounded animal at public'
sale, to the highest bidder, for cash. If no bid is offered for such animal, the Chief Animal
Control Officer may sell such animal at private sale or humanely destwy such animal, or
otherwise dispose of it as permitted by law.
Section 6.08.100. Proceeds of Snle. The proceeds of such sale, after first
deducting fees and charges of the Chief Animal Control Officer, including costs of sale, shall
he paid by the Chief Animal Control Officer, to the City, which shall then pay over to the
owner of such animal sold if chimed within one year thereafter. If not so chimed, the
monies shall be transferred into the general fund of the City.
Section 6.08.110. Redemption of Animnls by the Owner.
The owner or pe~on en~~ed to poues~ion of any animal impounded, may at
any time before the sale or other disposition thereof, redeem the same by paying the Chief
Animal Control Officer all fees and charges thereon.
Section 6.08.170. Cnst of Redemption. The Chief Animal Control Officer
shall charge and collea from each person redeeming any impounded animal an impounc!_i_ng
fee of $20.00, pins the actual costs of wanspoxthg the animal to impound, the actual costs of
veterinary and rehted services rendered to the animal while impounded, the actual cost of
-sale incurred, and the actual costs of any extraordinary measures required in or for the
handling and maintenance of the animal while impounded, and in addition thereto, the
maintenance fees as adopted by City Council resolution following a public hearing noticed as
required under State Law.
Section 6.08.130. Authorization to ~.nter upon Private Pr~l~'n~.
Notwithstanding any provisions contained in _this Chapter rehting to the entry
upon private paopaty for any pro'poses hereunder, no such entry may be conducted (a
without the consent of the l~rop~ty owner or the ~ having hwful possession thereof, or
with Code of Civil Procedures Section 1822.50 through 1822.56, inclusive, or c) except as
may otherwise be prescribed by hw.
Section 6.08.140. Inhumane Treatment and Abandonment] Impoundment.
A. No person shall treat an animal in a cruel or inhumane manner or willingly or
negligently cause or permit any animal to suffer unnecessary torture or pain. No person
shall abandon any animal without care on any public or private property.
B. Subject to the provisions contained in Section 6.06.150 herein, any animal
which is abandoned, or treated in a cruel or inhumane manner, or willingly or negligently
allowed to suffer necessary torture or pain in violation of Section 6.06.140 A herein, may
be impounded or disposed of in a humane manner. The City Council may adopt by
Resolution policies and standards for the disposition of animals ~:jzed, impounded and
forfeited pursuant to this Chapter.
Section 6.08.150. Impoundmerit Hearing.
At least three (3) working days prior to the impoundment of any animal, notice
shall be given in person to, or by mail to the last known address of, the owner or person
entitled to possession thereof of his or her right to a hearing as to whether or not such
impoundment is justified. ff the owner or person entitled to possession thereof requests a
hearing prior to impoundment, no impoundment shall take place until the conclusion of the
hearing except as provided herein. ff in the opinion of the Chief Animal Control Officer,
immediate impoundment is necessary for the preservation of the public health or safety, the
pre-impoundment hearing may be dispensed with; provided, however, in such cases the
95-O6 27
owner or person entitled to pos,_~ion thereof shall be given three O) working days notice as
provided herein of his or her fight to a he-rinl. If a hearing is requested, the he~rinl shah
be held within five (~ days of the request, and the animal shall not be sold, destroyed or
otherwise disposed. of prior to the conclusion of the he~rin~. Notice of the time, date and
place of the hearing shall be given to the owner or person entitled to posse~ thereof. If
at the end of the hearing, the impoundmerit is found to be unjustified, the animal shall be
returned to the owner or person entitled to possession thereof without charge.
Section 6.08.160. Pennlties.
A. Any individual violating any pwvision of this Chapter shall be deemed
guilty of an infraction or misdemeanor as hereinafter specified. Such hdividual shall be
deemed guilty of a separate offense for each and every day or portion thereof during which
any viohtion of any of the provisions of this Chapter is committed, continued, or permitted.
B. Any individual convicted of a violation of this Chapter shall be (1)
guilty of an infraction offense and punished by a free not exceeding one hundred dollars
($100.00) for a first violation; (2) guilty of an infraction offense and punishe~ by a fine not
exceeding two hundred dollars ($200.00) for a second violation perpeWated by the same
individual. The third and any additional violations perpetrated by the same individual shall
constitute a misdemeanor offense and shall be punishable by a fine not exceeding one
thousand dollars ($1,000.00) or six (6') months in jail, or both. Notwith,~nding the above,
first offense may be charged and prosecuted as a misdemeanor. Payment of any penalty
herein shall not relieve an individual from the responsibility for correcting the violation.
Onisg~4}6 2S
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTEB this 28th day of March, 1995
Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CAt-wORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE)
CITY OF ~)
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Ordinance No. 95-06 was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a
regular meeting of the City Council on the 14th day of March, 1995, and that thereafter, said
Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 28th
day of March 1995, by the following vote, to wit:
COUNCILlVl]EMBERS:
NOES:
CO~CH,MEMBM:
CO~CILMEMBERS:
June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk
95-06 29
ITEM 20
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPRO
CITY ATTORNEY
RNANCE OFFICE
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Gary Thornhill, Director of Plan 'ng~'')''
March 28, 1995
Request. to Support the State of California Wildlife Conservation Board
Acquisition of the Hidden Valley Ranch
Prepared By:
Craig D. Ruiz, Assistant Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
Receive Report and Provide Direction to Staff to Draft a Letter of
Support for the Mayor's Signature
BACKGROUND
On March 16, 1995, the Riverside County Habitat Conservation Agency (RCHCA) Board of
Directors directed their staff, at the request of the Preserve Our Plateau Committee, to write
a letter supporting the purchase of the Hidden Valley Ranch. The Hidden Valley Ranch is a
430 acre parcel of land surrounded on three sides by the Santa Rosa Plateau Ecological
Reserve (See Attachment No. 1 ). The State of California Wildlife Conservation Board is
currently considering the acquisition of the Hidden Valley Ranch for the purposes of adding
the land to the Reserve. The purchase would be funded entirely by the State.
The RCHCA Board requested that member cities also consider writing a letter supporting the
purchase. Councilmember Parks, the Council's representative to the RCHCA, requested that
this item be placed before the Council to consider said request.
FISCAL IMPACT
None.
Attachments:
1. Letter of Request from the Preserve Our Plateau - Page 2
R:\STAFFRPT\HIDDENVL.CC 3/20/95 kLb 1
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
LET!'ER OF REQUEST FROM THE PRESERVE OUR PLATEAU
R:\STAFFRPT\HZDDEIWL.CC 3/20/95 kLb 2
IThUrSday March ¶6 1995 5:26m -- From ,71A7872509' -- Ptge 2'~
· , ,11 · ~
slrongl~ supporting_ a $2.1 mi!lioo aUocxtio. from t~e Sine of Califomi~ Wildill;
~ Board for zquisitio~ Community suiVxt ~! be critical A ~ leemr is
AddreuyourleUere: W. JolmSchmidt, EucutiveDirector
Wildlife Cassenmioa Board
801 K Sinset, Suite 806
Sacrammt~CA ~14
SUPPORT for mddm Vattey -dd;dm to Stun RMa Plmmu Ecological Reserve.
Riva'side County
//~--
golden eagles, black-shouldered kites, SWainsort's hawks, Ixarrowing owls, and lmg-em, ed owls.
· This is a unique oppornmity m comfr~ California's wildlife befitage in a large, ecelogically
~pinrfil] UlfiL
· The Phican will be essential for s,--o, ssfui coxdpgchcnsive. mlti~ ~'i~ planning in
- The Hidden Vsney Ranch is Ibe beldwau3 for Cole Creek, is impomm to the bydrology of the
· The Hidden Vailey Ranch would pme sevem nmmgement Problems of it were imt t°
devHopment, as ith surround~d on three sides by the existing Reserve.
· The acquisition can help serve the needs ofpeople forpmssive reueMimt and tranquili~.as re'ban
· As a supesq. unique. and lxnn~fui example as Califotnia's natural heritage. the protection of the
TH..Uq!E YOU VERY MUCH
I
I
I
|
|
II
II
I I
I
I
I
/ '
ITEM 21
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROV
CITY ATTORNE~~
FINANCE OFFIC R
CITY MANAGE
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Gary Thornhill, Director of Plannin~
March 28, 1995
Winchester 1800 Specific Plan
Prepared By:
RECOMMENDATION:
Saied Naaseh, Associate Planner
Provide direction to staff to prepare City's official response to the
Board of Supervisors April 11, 1995 hearing regarding
Winchester 1800 Specific Plan.
BACKGROUND
The Board of Supervisors continued this item to the April 11,1995 hearing. City staff has had
a limited time to provide comments on the Specific Plan. The following general comments are
from the Planning, Public Works and Community Services Departments reflect the various
department's opinions. After the City Council meeting staff will prepare a letter to the Board
of Supervisors delineating the City's comments and concerns.
The attached Land Use Map is the latest available to staff. The Land Use Map might further
be amended since additional property owners have expressed a desire to be left out of the
Specific Plan. Since this a multiple ownership Specific Plan, perhaps it is best for the County
to prepare the Specific Plan to cover the entire project area.
General Plan Consistency
The General Plan Land Use Map reflects an earlier version of the Winchester 1800 Land Use
Map. The distribution of land uses on the most recent plan are similar to the General Plan.
The General Plan specifically requires the Specific Plan to provide pedestrian linkages between
commercial areas, schools, and parks. Moreover, the General Plan requires the Specific Plan
be sensitive to adjacent rural residential and Lake Skinner Recreation Area.
The Specific Plan proposes a limited network of off-street trails along the drainage channels;
however, these trails are only connected with expanded parkways that include sidewalks. The
Land Use Map is not sensitive to the adjacent rural residential uses and the Lake Skinner
Recreation Area as it does not provide transition and buffer areas.
R:\STAFFRPT\1800.CC 3121/95 ktb 1
Land Use Patterns
The project proposes 65 acres of commercial uses on four different sites plus a 36 acre
Commercial Recreation area next to Lake Skinner. No analysis has been provided to support
the viability of these commercial uses.
The proposed Land Use Map includes 4972 residential units. The majority of them
(approximately 3000 units) are 7200 square foot lots; approximately 1000 are 5000 square
foot lots; about 800 are high density; and 250 are low density with minimum half acre lots.
Land Use Compatibility
The Specific Plan is not compatible with the surrounding land uses that include Lake Skinner
and very low density residential with 1,2.5, and 5 acre minimum lot sizes. The Specific Ran
needs to be sensitive to these surrounding uses by providing similar uses, buffers, and-.
transition areas within the Specific Plan.
The Specific Ran does not have internally compatible land uses. Large 2-3 acre lots are
immediately adjacent to 5000-7200square foot lots or commercial areas. Internal transition
areas and adequate buffers need to be provided.
Ooen Soace and Biology
The open space within the Specific Plan is minimal. The total open space provided is 148
acres which is approximately eight percent of the total area. Planning Areas 20 and 25, two
separate hills, are proposed as open space for a total of 74 acres. Additionally, two drainage
courses for a total of 74 acres are being preserved as open space with proposed trails.
Adequate linkage is not provided between these open space areas other than street sidewalks.
These linkages, if provided, would enhance the movement of wildlife within the project which
would eventually lead to other wildlife corridors outside of the project such as the Skinner and
Domenigoni preserve areas.
Planning Areas 20 and 25 contain Riversidian Sage Scrub which is habitat to many sensitive
species. However, these Planing Areas are separated by Street "A" and 7200 square foot
lots which reduces the long term viability of the habitat area. The road should be re-routed
and the area between these two Planning Areas should be dedicated as open space. At a
minimum a viable biological connection needs to be provided between the two Planning Areas.
The biological study identifies additional Riversidian Sage Scrub between these Planning Areas.
The project is proposing to eliminate 2.5 acres of wetland/Willow Riparian Woodland which
is a significant biological resource. This resource should be preserved.
parks
Based upon the Riverside County park land dedication requirement of three (3) acres per
thousand residents, Specific Plan No, 286 proposes to dedicate 38,7 acres of park land for
public use. The City of Temecula has higher park land dedication requirement of five (5) acres
per thousand residents. Pursuant to this standard, the City's park land requirement for this
project would be approximately 63.4 acres, However, since the entire 38,7 acres of parks
is identified within the Winchester 1800 development, it is possible that the apparent shortfall
R:\STAFFRPT\1800.CC 3/21/95 ktb 2
in park land could be mitigated through additional land dedications or payment of in-lieu fees
applied to the remaining portions of the Specific Plan.
It should also be noted that the City only accepts park land that is developable for active park
use. The City does not consider open space, slopes, trails or floodway areas as credit towards
the overall park land dedication requirements. in addition, the City requires that all park sites
are fully improved to the City standards and dedicated pursuant to a pre-determined number
of building permits for the project. While Specific Plan No. 286 references that parks will be
constructed during certain phases of development, it does not indicate a definite timetable for
park dedications.
Community Services supports the concerns from the Riverside County Regional Park and Open
Space District to address the trail and bike path alignments designated within SWAP. In
addition, all proposed trails and bike lanes shall be consistent with the City's General Plan and
Parks and Recreation Master Plan. A Bike Lane Exhibit is recommended to identify Class I and:
Class II bike lanes on all roadways 66' or wider.
Community Services highly recommends the establishment of an active Home Owners'
Association (HOA) to provide for the maintenance of common open space areas, walls,
fences, and interior landscaping. The City's Landscape Maintenance Program is limited to
perimeter landscaping adjacent to single family residential development. Therefore, the City
cannot commit to the acceptance of fee title of open space areas or easements that were
accepted by, or reserved to, the County Service Area (CSA). The City reserves the right to
accept only those areas that are consistent with the City's Maintenance Program. All other
areas would be required to be maintained by the HOA.
Circulation
Public Works staff has reviewed the Traffic Study and has prepared the following comments:
Additional intersections which should be included in this evaluation are:
Winchester Road at Beeler Road/Street "A"
Washington Street at Keller Road
Washington Street at Auld Road
The site access exhibit shown in this report does not reflect access points as submitted on the
preliminary land use plan dated February 6, 1995· This exhibit is inconsistent with City
Standards.
The section, "Accommodation for Alternative Modes", covers transit as the only alternative
mode of transportation. There is little or no discussion about non-motorized transportation.
It is felt a project of this magnitude should include a comprehensive plan for such
transportation including Class II & III bike lanes and specific alignment routes for Class I bike
paths and multi-use trails.
Although the developer went to great effort to prepare an infrastructure financing plan, the
resulting funding mechanism for providing the necessary infrastructure to serve this project
(a special fee district through the County of Riverside) may not be the most efficient means
of providing these facilities. It also may result in these roads being built "behind the
R:\STAFFRPT\1800,CC 3/21/95 ktb 3
development curve". It may be preferable for the project to be conditioned to construct
certain off-site infrastructure elements based on a balancing of mitigation responsibilities.
Drainage
A Hydrology Study was not submitted with the EIR, making it difficult to analyze drainage
concerns.
$taff's concerns regarding drainage were addressed in the EIR as follows:
CONCERN:
Portions of the Specific Plan are within a floodplain area, resulting in
potential flood hazards.
MITIGATION:
Section 18: 'Proposed grading shall meet FEMA standards for 100-year
flood protection to all habitable dwellings located in a floodplain."
CONCERN:
Any construction of buildings, roads and other impervious surfaces will
result in increased on-site storm water runoff and the grading of existing
on-site drainage courses including some "blueline" streams.
MITIGATION:
Section 20: "Any impact to the blueline watercourses shall be subject
to the requirements of an Army Corps of Engineer 404 permit and a
Department of Fish and Game 1601 or 1603 permit." "
CONCERN:
The project lies within the Dam Inundation Area of Lake Skinner,
potentially exposing future residents to flooding in the event of dam
failure due to seismic event.
MITIGATION:
Section 21: "All final subdivision maps will indicate that the proposed
project lies in a potential dam inundation zone of Lake Skinner.
Coordination between the applicant and the County Disaster
Preparedness Office in establishing emergency evacuation routes.'
CONCERN:
According to the EIR, the Project's 100 year outflow will increase from
17,300 cfs in the natural condition to 20,680 cfs in the developed
condition. The northern part of the project will discharge off-site into
the proposed Quinta do Logo Specific Plan. Increased flow rates from
the project may contribute to cumulative increased flow. rates
downstream and the potential for flooding in areas with undersized
facilities. The proposed Drainage Plan utilizes the projects's streets,
underground storm drains, and open channels (turf end concrete-lined)
to carry storm water through the project. The drainage system is
designed to utilize the existing natural drainage courses wherever
feasible.
MITIGATION:
Section 19: 'Storm drain and flood control facilities discharging at the
tract boundary shell be deigned in order to outlet at the pre-existing
velocity and depths in order to minimize impacts to the downstream
property owner.'
R:\STAFFRPT\1800.CC 3/21/95 ktb 4
RCFCD condition:
'This project should include retention facilities in the design that would
control runoff of all storms up to a one in one hundred year storm st that
the downstream peak flow would not increase due to this development.
These retention facilities should be designed in conformance with a
watershed wide retention policy that would be implemented by the
Board.
CONCERN:
The project will be required to obtain the appropriate NPDES
construction permit, in order to eliminate pollutants in the storm water
discharge to the greatest extent possible (including silt).
MITIGATION:
Section 23: 'All projects proposing construction activities which is part
of a larger common plan of development of five acres or greater shall
obtain the appropriate NPDES construction permit."
CONCERN:
The Specific Plan lies within the boundaries of the Riverside County
Flood Control District (RCFCD) Murrieta Master Area Drainage Plan and
should therefore be conditioned to participate by paying the appropriate
fees.
MITIGATION
Section 22: 'The project site is within the RCFC & WCD Murrieta Creek
Area Drainage Plan and will be subject to drainage fees of e 1,023 and
9530 per acre, respectively.'
According to the EIR, these proposed systems will be designed per RCFCD requirements. The
major drainage facilities will be maintained by RCFCD end Riverside County Transportation
Department. The local drainage facilities will be maintained by County Service Area, RCFCD
or similar public/private agencies.
Water and Sewer
All systems will be designed and installed per Eastern Municipal Water District requirements.
For the most part, the Mitigation Monitoring Program associated with the EIR has adequately
addressed Staff's concerns with respect to drainage, circulation, and utilities. However, in
order to minimize the negative impacts to the City of Temecula associated with this project,
it is critical that the Responsible Party/Monitoring Party (the County of Riverside) follow the
mitigation program closely during the implementation or development stage of the project.
FISCAL IMPACT
None
Attachments:
Winchester 1800 Land Use Map - Page 6
Various Correspondence - Page 7
R:\STAFFRPT\1800.CC 3/21/95 ktb 5
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
WINCHESTER 1800 LAND USE MAP
R:\STAFFRPT\1800.CC 3121/95 kLb 6
P.A. 17
P.A. In
P.A.I
_ Very Illlh
'~ P,L IS P.A. 14 *
Preliminary Land Use Plan
WINCHESTER 1800
181~ 14~,Azt~ur BIrd.. ~ iO0. h'vW~. CA It/IS t~mm [
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
VARIOUS CORRESPONDENCE
R:\STAFFRPT\1800.CC 3/21/95 ktb
City of Temecula
43174, Business Park Drive · Temecula, California 92590
(9CF7) 694-198<7
· FAX (909) 694-1999
Ma~h 3, 1995
Preston Gibson llI
COscan/Stewart Partnership
Suite 30
1520 Brookhollow Drive
Santa Aria, CA 92705
Dear Mr. Gibson:
The purpose of thi.~ letter it to inform you that the City Council has scheduled their review Of
the Winchester 1800 Specific Plan for its March 28, 1995 meeting. We expect to be able to
provide official comments to you and the Board of Supervisors following that meeting. ff you
have any additional questions concerning thig letter or would like to meet to discuss specific
issues, please contact me at (909) 694-6400.
Sincerely,
Gary Thornhill
Director of planning
R:%HOGAND%SP286-2.LTR 3/3/95 oaf
~)Prir~ed on Recycled PaOer.
PARK ENGINEERING
DXTE:
TRANeMITTAL TIMB:
C~P~Y
taxi
NUMBER OF BHIBT8 (ZlIGIfUDIIIO LEAD 8HB/T):- .-
6430 leXdee ST. m ENIK, Cl ~062Z - (/14)S2Z-46~O - FAX (ll4)Slt-lt/O
cc: R. Bradley
G. ~hornhill
11): lemeadm (:t~ (,~uwdl
R. ls Wirecreator IN)0 Project
!kmr
11,b letter b In oppodtJen to 1be Wtmebeeter 1800 l'rejegt elms yea wl be karbm nab
evealto Due to eel' .... S eebedele~ ! me metMe to arMrod, but went to meke dear my
,~ost"~t, mul thee of my $arl.mmmd~ ~ I$ iS SI$' b$imt epimio$t lied $m$l$$tiou,
that tbe City of T~ -:-./P met Bream ¢emaq, bad, ia. tim WtoSketer IMO Prmjmet, the
Jobmoo bueh ProJect, or setS, orbs. eoeue ~ t~ earrealty mad rural end
eFkelturaL
11te City or Treeeels item witbb fee bonedmales jellkieet lend for build-oUt Of ebouemmb
ef yet uneoewecied ,midam. 11m h--~ :st emmumlt~ omuw, eu ,in, w~
is is ETR. Mmtve peiHdatiem tlmt eun'oafiy mmm4 ass the fe~-I~V, wltk lelllle Jams
tlaroulbout fiat e, tt)', wrdl be tarled eva furtim' witit mm a~ ~i" el twenty
vok_leedmr traf/iea per day, mat or Ihm preJoete* liMbwaY '3~ led laucb6 (hilterda bad
wB Ibm need to be wldemod to sis lime bilhwe3m te bade thte mmoMMt
The qUatutneee of Temmll Im qwk~17 e'-~i~t~-- h-I, aud omlY fereellbt em ties
pert emm stop lamp-fro8 etpmndoetmm, Pieale mllt t)J~ momq, devdopee~ mad
temptation to eover the rural b~ut3~ of TemMub with meat mini tile
Rimeerd),,
!)evM C. JLobbseoe,
Diplomete of the Ames'lie totrd of humfly Practice
714-6771716 RRT PRSTOOR Be1 F~I FEB 14 '~5 16:419
_ . CODYSALES
Februmy 18,. 1995
'4
221g03Vilde(:iemll, h~~~925R
900 6774346 i FAX 906 677-1716
cc: R. Bradley
G,;tltornhl-11~
Temecula Mayer Jeff 8tone and
Coundl Ms,,bcrs Undeman. s, Munoz, Parks, end Roberrs
Temecula City;Hi
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
Dear Coundl Members:
imwrmng bt regerd to the i , >c Wlnciteater leOOproject (O 4mk, Ran ;286),
IocatedwithinTemecule'saphemofinteteL I am concemed about tbe potential
end historic.
Among the resources to. be impacted are several NaUve Arner!oen archaeological sites .:
and several hleloric etructures, These ere known sites of moegnized.mgtorml.
iml:g)rtBnce. Of Particular h~blf It ill a Native Americ~ cerr3~f, ai,ffi' ~ ind.l.~tng ·
sign~icance.. ,.
As a local reeldent with 8 background in history and Cultural reeources management,
and as lest preaident of the Teme Valley Museum, I reeo~.d~e the. value of these
sites to Tams ~ule Valley end River~de Coun~ hb~on/. The/~ ~ndure ~ the
unklue ~haremer of Wds are~ and their ~ should be Inoorpo~ into any
development Pbr4. .. ·
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,.
Jolene Cody Peetoor
cc: G. Thornhill
Friends of the Alamos District
37100 Los Alamos Road
Murrieta, CA 92563
January 19, 1995
Honorable Jeff Stone, Mayor
Council Members
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
Re: Winchester 1800 Specific Plan
Dear Mayor Stone and Council Members,
During a recent County hearing I attended on the Winchester
1800 Specific Plan in French Valley, several Riversida County
supervisors expressed an interest in knowing if Temecula supports
the project. The project's EIR includes a letter from the Temecula
planning staff but does not indicate your city's direct support.
County supervisors expressed the following concerns:
(1) The project is untimely and will introduce urban
development into the rural residential area at least 2 1/2 miles
from urban areas at Silverhawk and within Temecula's city limits.
(2) There are no financing mechanisms for its impacts on
water, sewer, and road facilities including Winchester Road.
(3) It does not conform to the County General Plan.
Members of the public were also concerned that the plan for
Murrieta Creek does not take into account the Winchester 1800
runoff; that mitigations for project impacts on historic and
prehistoric sites are deferred and piecemealed; and that the
project's traffic will increase noise, community fragmentation, and
emissions in the area. Several speakers proposed reducing dwelling
units and commercial areas and advocated clustering development.
The City could help resolve these issues. Would it be
possible for your Planning Commission to review the project and
make recommendations? Would the City also be interested in
development a phasing plan for urbanization in French Valley? I
know you all share concerns for the area's economic development and
quality of life. Phasing may be one means to encourage timely
economic developments within Temecula itself.
The hearing on the project has been continued to February 28.
Residents in the area would much appreciate your active involvement
in the review in any way possible.
Thank you very much for your consideration of the matter.
Sincerely,
Rita Gentry
Spokesperson
The Resource~ A~ency
BanlC of America or cdaro a- ' ....' '°' °"'
February 1995
Dear Colleague:
Enclosed you will find an important report, Beyond Sprawl: Ne~ Patterns of Growth.w Fit
the Ne~ California, that addresses one of ~he most impor2nt issues facing C~lifomia- the
manner in which the state will grow in the remaining years of this century and into the next.
The report offers a variety of ideas and recommendations as to how Californians -- individ-
ual citizens, businesses, government leaders, and communities alike -- can work together to
ensure that C~lifornia continues to grow economically and provide its residents an atutctive,
high-clu. ality place to live and work.
The sponsors of this report- Bank of America, the California Resources Agency, Greenbelt
Alliance, and the Low Income Housing Fund -- believe that California must pursue growth
and development that is sustainable. Unfettered sprawl will make the state less competitive,
burden taxpayers with higher costs, degrade the environment, and lower the quality of life
for every Californian.
We believe the time to act is now. We have produced this report with the hope that it will
help focus the public dialogue about C~lifornia's growth and move it forward in ways that
wffi provide the greatest benefits for ourselves and future generations.
Thank you for your time and consideration. If you would like additional copies of this report,
please contact any of the sponsoring organizations listed on the final page.
Sincerely,
Dick Rosenberg
B~ oF AMW, XC.A
G~ELT ALLIANCE
Douglas P. Wheeler
CAIJFORNA RESOURCES AGENCY
Daniel M. Leibsohn
Low INCOM~ HOUSnqG FUND
BEYOND SPRAWL:
N :w PATTERNS OF GROWTH TO
THE N :W CALWOnNt
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Califorma is at.a unique and unprecedented point in its history--a point atwhich we face profound questions
about our future growth that will determine the state's economic vitality and quality of life for the next gener-
ation and beyond.
One of the most .fundamental questions we face is whether California can afford to support the pattern of urban
and suburban development, o~en referred ~ as "sprawl," that has characterized its growth since Worm War II.
There is no question that this pat-
tern of growth has helped fuel
Califomia's unparalleled economic and
population boom, and that it has
enabled millions of Californians to real-
ize the enduring drum of home owner-
ship. But as we ~pproach the 21st
century, it is clear that sprawl has creat-
ed enormous costs that California can
no longer afford. Ironically, unchecked
sprawl has shifted from an engine of
Califomia~ growth to a force that now
threateus to inhibit growth and degrade
the quality of our life.
This report, sponsored by a diverse
coalition of organizations, is meant to
serve as a call for California to move
beyond sprawl and rethink the way we
will grow in the future. This is not a
new idea, but it is one that has never
Despite dramatic changes in California
over the last decade, traditional devel-
opment patterns have accelerated.
Urban job centers have decentralized to
the suburbs. New housing tracts have
moi~ed even deeper inw agricultural and
environmentally sensitive areas. Private
auto use continues to rise.
This acceleration of sprawl has sur-
faced enormous social, environmental
and economic costs, which until now
have been hidden, ignored, or quietly
bume by society. The burden of these
costs is becoming very Clear. Businesses
suffer frmn higher costs, a loss in work-
er productivity, and underutilized
investments in older communities.
California's business climate
becomes less attractive than surround-
ing states. Suburban residents pay a
expenses, while residents of older cities
and subufos lose access to jobs, social
stability, and political power. Agri-
culture and ecosystems also suffer.
There is a fundan~ntal dynamic to
growth, whether it be the growth of a
community .or a ~orporation, that
evolves from expansion to maturity.
The early stages of growth are often
exuberant and unchecked--that has
certainly been the case in post-World
War II California. But unchecked
growth cannot be sustained forever. At
some point this initial surge must
mature inw more managed, strategic
gxowth. This is the point whe~ we now
stand in California.
We can no longer afford the luxury
of sprawl. Our demographics axe shift:-
ing in dramatic ways. Our economy is
been more critical or urgent. heavy price in marion and automobile resu'ucuning. Our environment is under
increasing stress. We cannot shape
· . .~ .. . .~~ ~ This is not a call for limiting
corn. qr~ ~ ~' S- .- , growth, but a call for California to be
V: will ~'i ineaninifuI ~bnt~budon to the public dialogue about the quality California 'i quality of life and economic
"Even as our economy
and our society are
being reinvented daily,
we continue to abandon
·
'- people and investments.
r}:: .
~.grow ~
BEYOND SPRAWL
It is a tall order---one that calls for us
to rise above our occasional isolation as
individuals and interest groups, and
address these profound challenges as a
community. All of us-government agen-
cies, businesses, community organizations
and citizens--plaY a role. Our actions
should be guided by the following goals:
· To provide more certainty in
determining wher~ new devel-
opment should and should not :
· Tomakemo~dftcicntnscofisnd
including a strong focus on job
cn~ttion and housing in estab~
· ToostabtishalegalandF°ccdunl
cextainty and send the rill economic
· Tobuildabroad-basectconstimencY
to combat sprawl that includes
govcnuncnt leadca and others-
Californians atg already taking some
of these steps. We bave attemla~d in this
report to not oaly point out the obstacles to
sustained growth, but also m highlight the
positive actions that ax~ occtm4alg Io better
manage growth. Our fundamental message
is that we must build on these early suc-
cesses and take more comprehensive and
decisive steps over thc uext fcw yeazs to
meet this challenge. To build a stxong,
,n*brant economy and ensug a high quality
of tile for the 21st centroT, we must move
beyond sprawl in the few remaining years
of the 20th cennuT.
In the face of this change, California
remains shackled to costly patterns of sub-
urban sprawl. Even as our economy and
our society are being reinvented daily, we
continue to abnndon people and invest-
ments in older communities as develop-
meat leap-frogs out to fringe areas to
accommodate another generation of low-
density living. And we continue to create
communities that rely almost exclusively
on automobiles for wansportation. In short,
the =new" California--with 32 million
people and counting--is using land and
other resources in much the same fashion
as the "old" California, with only 10 rail-'
lion people.
We cannot afford another generation
of sprawl. As the Governor's Growth
Management Council stated in a recent
report: "What may have been possible with
l0 or even 20 million people is simply not
sustainable for a population of twice that
much in the same space." Continued
sprawl may seem inexpensive for a new
homebuyer or a growing business on the
suburban fringe., but the ultimate cost-=m
tho~ homeowners, t~th~ govcrnmcnt, and
Allowing sprawl ma~ be politically expe-
dient in tlz short rim, but in the long run it
~ will make California economically uncom-
petitire and crea~ social, environmental
and political problems we may not be able
m solve.
~ At a time when economic growth is
slow and social tensions a~ high, it is usy
' m dismiss an issu~ like suburban sPrawl as
superfluous. Yet it lies at th~ heart of the
very economic, social and environmental
' issues that we face Kxiay. Rapid populatiun
growth and eamomic change are occurring
in a state increasingly characterized by
a limited supply of d=velopable land,
environmental stress at the metropolitan
fa:mge, and older communities in transition-
With th~ onset of economic t~covcry,
next few years will give rise to land-us~
decisions of fundamental imponanc=- Th~
will help determine whether our staz can
succeed in t~-establishing th= ~conomic
anti social vitality that have mad~ it such a
successful place to live and work for
than 140 years.
INTRODUCTION
California is at the crossroads of
teqnlmtuemty anofdaestae'smajor}
is changing dramatically. New racial and
truly multiculnn~ society, a~ating a vsiety
same time, CalifomiatmsemerSedasnoe°f
mexopolitan areas continue m grow in popu-
Suburban Sprawl and the
"Old" California
In the decades after World War H,
California emerged as an economic and
political powerhouse, providing jobs, hous-
ing and prosperity for most of its rapidly
growing population.
Underlying this success was a devel-
opment pattern that emphasized expanding
metropolitan areas, conversion of farmland
and natural ~reas to residential use, and
heavy use of the antomobile. In ~ postwar
~ this way of life .worked for C. alifomia-
With a prosperous and land-rich state, most
families were able to rise to the middle
class and achieve the dream of home own-
ership. Government agencies and private
businesses were able to provide the infra-
structure of growth--new homes, roads,
schools, water systems, sewage treatment
facilities, and extensions of gas and electric
disuibutiom
Within the last generation, however,
this postwar formula for success has
become overwhelmed by its own conse-
quences. Since the 1970s, housing has
become more expensive, roads have
become more congested, the supply of
developable land has dwindled, and,
because of increasing costs, government
agencies have not been able to keep up
with the demand for public services.
Since the late 1970s, several efforts
have been initiated to address the question
of how to manage California's grow~ but
all have failed---some for lack of consen-
sus, some for lack of engaged constituency,
sumc simply because of bad timing.
THE CHALLENGE OF THE
"NEW" CALIFORNIA
n the 1990s, California is undergoing
change of such scale and significance
Ithat it will literally rede~n~ the state.
To succeed, the new California must recog-
nize and build upon the following changes
in positive ways.
Population Growth
California's population continues to grow
at a remarkably fast pace. Today's total of
approximately 32 million people t~-presents
a doubling of the population since the mid-
1960s, when California became the
nation's most populous state.
I)uting the boom years of the 1980s,
California n_d_~ed_ more than 6 million new
residems, a population larger than all but a
few of the 49 other states. Even during the
bust years of the early 1990s, the state's
population grew at a rate of almost a half-
million people per year--in effect, adding
another Oakland or Fresno every year--
even as we have suffered a net loss in the
number of jobs.
This continuing surge in pupuhtion
pots pressure on both existing communities
BEYOND SPRAWL
and on the remaining supply of undevel-
oped land, making it extremely difficult for
traditional suburban patterns to accommo-
dote more people.
Changing Demographics
While growing rapidly° Califomia's popu-
lation is also changing in significant ways.
The demographic changes are well docu-
mented. Lndnos-=whose roots extend to
Mexico, Central America, South America,:
and the Cazil>bean---arc growing rapidly in
number and may noraumber Artgins a gen-
eration from now. Californians of Asian
ancestry now make up ahnest 10 percent of
an important racial group, and the state's
metric is rounded out by Native Americans,
immigrants from South Asia and the
Middle East, and others who bring great
dlvenity to the state. California is truly one
of the worid's most multicultural societies.
'Underneath the racial diversity lies
another important change in the state's
population patterns that will have a
profound effect on California's attitudes
toward growth over the next generation.
Traditionally, the popular perception
haSbeen that Culifomia's population ~'ows
because of migration from other pa.qs of
the United States. However popular, this
perception is no longer true. Most new
Californians now come from other coun-
The birth rate is also an increasing
source of population growth. During the
1990s recession, "natural increase"~e
net total of births over deaths--has
accounted for almost 400,000 new people
each year. Tomorrow's California will
inctu~for the first time---a vast pool of
,.
people who are Californians from birth.
They will want What Californians before
them have wanted---education, jobs and
a way to accommodate them. But their
numbers are so huge that they probably
cannot be sustained by traditional subufoan
development patterns.
Economic Change
During the recession, California has
undergone an unprecedented economic
testructttring. The stui'' has lost 400,(XX}
:':.:. .-.:-L.~':' -'-..' -. ,'
sm'ge in population puts
· , :-/. . .~ .... . · ,..',~ .. -. ·
.:,;Z~.,~,~:.~=~ :' ~.~.~,~;,~.~'.:j..::;:.~ .. . -
.:/~t~ · . .:~-:-.:
..
.Easy mobility for the
middle class.has caused
them to abandon many
':' oMeF neighborhoods~:' '~
ia .
BEYOND SPRAWL
manufacturing jobs since 1990, causing
businesses and workers alike to rethink old
assumptions about how to ensure prosperity.
Traditional foundations of the state's
economy. such as newspace and defense,
have been drastically reduced and will
probably never return, at least not in their
previous form. Others---such as entertain-
ment, technology, the garment industry and
agriculture--=remain just as important us
ever. But they too have undergone
dous change, becoming leaner and more
efficient in response m global competitiop-
And small businesses t~nain the largest
source of new job creation. In the near
f~ture, the impact of the North American
Free Trade ASlzement will beg to be fdt.
These economic changes are also
l~ninJ ln~ssure on the state's hind-use pat-
terns. The loss of manufacturing jobs is;
emptying out the state's long-established
industrial he, as, usually located in older
communities. Dm~tsizing and zchnologi-
cat change in other indusnies is also
defing older building obsolete and treat- -
ing a demand for new boildings~fzen in
new ~uburbs---that are both inexpensive
and flu~ble- The closure of many m~tary
tmu is bringing a huge amount of land to
the real estate madoct that will either
extend sprawl or encourage new
development patterns, depending on how
Spreading Urbanintion
nomic pmuum, CaUfon~a has t~:ome the
most urbanized state in the union.
A~cording to the 1990 Census, more than
80 puz:ent of all Californians live in meu~
polltan amns of 1 mi~on people or ~
with 30 percent of the state's population
This large-scale urbanization means
that Califomia's people and businesses
compete intensely with each other for
space to live and work. The edges of
metropolitan areus continue to grow to
accommodate expansion of population and
economic activity, whUe some ncgleaed
inner-city areas are left behind. These
patterns increase the stress of daily life
while, at the same time, put mote pressu~
on land and environmental resources at the
metropolitan fzinge~
SPRAWL AND ITS CAUSES
I! of these factors-=a growing pop-
changing economy, and
uxkmnization--have been
present in California for many yeats. But
they have accelerated in the 1990s. while
tr4ditional suburban development patients
have continued. In a state with such power-
rut ~'owth dynamics, the resui~ a=e aston-
ishing. The following trends a~ P/pical of
the effects of sprawl over the last 10 to
20 yean:
· Employment centers have decen-
tralized dramatically. While jobs
used to be concutlramd. in central
cities, most axe now cmsled in the
newer suburbs. For e-~l~".~ the
complex of offwe centm around
John Wayne Ahpon in Orange
County--built on !and that was, until
a generation ago, cuttivalnt for tima
~tly smlmssed downtown
San Francisco as the sinand-largest
employment center in the state.
· New housing tracts tam pushed
ronnaentaily sensitive areas, Job
centers in suburban Sanlnse and the
· East Bay areahave opemdup TracY,
V alley tom as "l~dm0m subre'ha,"
while job ~rewtkvin the San
Fenrondo Valley tm ssln=,~nted
housing construction 40 miles to the
north in the Antelope Valey. This
development has crealed meuopolis-
es ViXTt!~y 11nmine~2fV' in ~
· Dependence oo the rammobile has
between t~70 and 1990 ~ sme's
polxfiation grew by 50 iss~nt, but
the total number of ~ wavded by
· tsointion ofouler c= -rues,
including central ~ and 'qlrst
and DSQs~ has increased- Easy
mobility for the tnic!t~e ~ has
_--_,t~ed them to abandon many older
izationofjobshesbit&!erneigh-
betboodsespec~yhad, becanse
new jobe are now vinna!ly inac__~--~-
ble to the poor and the ~nting
class. Also left behind m~ inf~c-
dously expensive to tqticate in new
Even thouBh the c~nse,p-" of s!x~wl
attempm to combat it have been fragmented
and imffective- The engine of sprawt is fueled
by a mix of individual choices, market forces,
and government policies, most of which have
only become more entrenched over time.
[] A perception that new suburbs are
safer and more desirable than
existing communities. Many people
believe that suburbs provide ~
with good vflue--snfe su~'ts, neigh-
hothood schools, a "smaft-town"
atomsphere, clo~ proximity to their
local governments, and new (though
not n_~___~ily better) community
· A perception that suburbs are
cheaper than urban alternatives.
Owning a starter home in a distant
new sul~rb is still within the finan-
cial reach of a typical family, despite
family's financial equation, howev-
er, does not ~ into accoant the
larger cost to society of far-flung
suburbs--a cost the faznily will
~venmally sha~ in paying.
· A belief that suburban
communities will give businesses
more ~e~'bility to grow. Businesses
welcome the tax incentives and fn~eclom
from heavy regulation that am often
provided in newer suburban cmnmu-
nifies trying to develop a strong
business base. Businesses also view
sutm/oan l~ations as safer--a view
reflected in the cost of insuran~e--
and they perceive they will have
· Technological changes that have
decentralized employment away
from traditional contess. This
phenongnon permits dispenal of
both jobs and houses a~ross a huge
m The ~rner~enc~ of rig "infor-
mation superhighway" my a~eler-
· llighway and automobile subsidies
that have traditionally fueled sub-
urban growth retain in place
today. Sinco the 1950s, autonmbile
u.m has be~n encouraged by guvem-
merit-financed road-building pro-
grams, and for the most part tl~
"extnnal costs" of automobil~ use
(i.e., air pollution) have not been the
direct financial responsibility of the
individual motorist.
BEYOND SPRAWL
· ~ !and-use polkies tint inad-
vertently ~nuse sprawl. In many
older subut'oan communities, "slow-
growth" attitudes rutrict new clevel-
opment. pushing employment and
housing growth to the metropolitan
fringe. With a lack of regional plan-
ning, e~h community pursues its
own self-interests, regarcll~ss of
costs imposed on other communities.
· Fiscal incentives that encourage
Iocl governments to "cherry-
pick" land uses based on tax con-
siderations. Under Proposition 13' s
property-tax limitations, there is lit-
~ fiscal incentive for many commu-
nities to accept affordal~ housing--
and when such housing is built,
developers must usually pay heavy
~leveloptn~nt f~es. Meanwhile,
be~__u~ communities must raise rev-
auto denim and renilezs, both big
sales-tax pmducors, receive subsi-
dies to locam in communities.
The result of all these factors is a'
sever~ r~gional irabalance. Housing, jobs,
across a hugo a~a and long auto trips a~
often required to connect them. Such a
development pattnn impos~s a consiclerab!~
cost on all who us~ it, though the costs a~
often hidden and thos~ who pay them are
not always aware of it.
THE COST OF SPRAWL
he cost and consequences of sprawl
have been documented among acad-
Tnnics and planning experts for more
than two deades. In the e~rly 1970s, phno
JOhn Blayney produ~'d a lanamark study
showing that in some cases, a Califomi~
community would be betmr off financially
if it used a combination of zoning and !and
a~qulsifion instead of Ignnining develop-
merit of low-density subdivisious. A few
years later, the U.S. Council on
mark repor~ ~te Coff of Sprawl--the first
comprehensive analysis of sprswl's tree
fit analysis m-Jmiquas have b~onm mor~
t~finext, the mg cost of sprawl has bKotn~
much mor~ apparent.
Today, no one in California is unaff~-
ed by tim cost of sprawl. Its cot.seqnences
spread across all groups, regardless of
geography, race, income, or political sums-
!i
BEYOND SPRAWL
i']. "A recent Survey by
T~xpayers
Sprawling suburbs may be cheaper in the
short-term for individuals and families who
buy houses in new communities, but their
"hidden" costs may ultimately be passed on
to taxpayers in a variety of ways.
· The cost of building and maintaining
highways and other major infrastruc-
ture improvements to serve distant
suburbs.
· The cost of dealing with social prob-
lems that fester in older neighbor-
hoods when they are neglected or
abandoned-
· The cost of solving environmental
problems (wedands, endangered
"species, air pollution, water pollu-
tion) caused by development of vir-
Taken together, it is clear that all these
costs have conuibuted to Californin's dire
fiscal situation during the 1990s, which has
strained state and local government budgets
to ~ bruking point.
Businesses
Many businesses benefit from suburban
locations- But all businesses, both small and
large, also bear many of the following costs.
· Adverse impacts on the stnte's
business dimate. By t~lucing the
quality of life, sprawl has made
California a less desirable location
for business owners and potential
employees. By increasing suburban
resistance to ~ growth, sprawl
has made it difficult for businesses to
Both these trends increase the am'ac-
tiveness of neighboring states such
as Arizona, Nevada, and Utah. For
example, a major ~m studio t~cent-
ly decided to relocate its animadon
because of lower housing prices and
less traffic cougostion.
· Higher 'direct business costs and
taxes to offset the side*effects of
sprawl This can include the cost of
new business infrasuv~z or of
midSating ttmtsporuttion and anvi-
romnental problems. For example, in
regulators have forced businesses m
take the lead in fighting air pollution
by initiating carpooling programs for
their employees.
· A geogrnphknl mismatch between
workers and jobs, lending to high-
er labor costs and a loss in worker
productivity. Many workers mast
now commute long distanc~ to their
jobs, which takes a significant roll on
their personal, family and profas-
sional life. Many other workers are
rgmoved from large portions of the
job market simply because they can-
not get to where the new jobs ar~.
· Abandoned investments in older
communities, which become eco-
uomicaily uncompefitive because
of sprawl and its associated subsi-
dies. This is especially ~rue of the
mte's utility companies, whose
investments in gas, clecuk and
ed in emblish.ed communities-
Residents d New Suburbs
There is no question that new suburban tesi-
cknts axe, intoany ways, the ptincipat be~-
ficimies d so~ sitawl Tnq often live
many suburban residents arc becoming
~gly aware that they pay a high price
for these bendits in the following ways.
· The cost of automobiles- The average
Califomian ~ one dollar out °f
every five on buying and maintaining
theircats. As acomequen~theY have
leas to invest or spend on other items'
· Time lost commuting to work and
other destinations- A huge number
of Californians now spend an hour or
number continues to rise. A recent
ConIra Costa Times sixowed that the
commuto times for tmidents d 10
counties had inctasd an average °f
13 percent between 1980 and 1990.
· Theeostdnewmburtmninfra'
metme- Sutaeos me allen per-
in fact. most new submhan homebuy-
en in C.,alilornia musz pay addidoual
taxes (usually !viello-Roos taxes) to
cover the massive cost of new t°ads'
additional taxes otkn have the effect
of doubling a new homeowner's
prolgt~ tax bill.
Residents of Central Cities and Older
Suburbs
Residents of central cities and older sub-
urbs are among the biggest losers in the
sprawl process. Once they were among the
most fortunate of metropolitan dwellers,
because their central location provided
access m jobs, shopping, and other arneni-
ties. However, sprawl has penalized them
by creating or accelerating the following
· Loss of jobs and access to jobs.
P,~sidents of older neighborhoods no
longer have convenient access to
most JObs. This is especially difficult
for po~r and working<lass citizens
who must rely on public
nnspomtion, because it is difficult
to commute to most suburban jobs
without a car.
· Economic segregation and less of
social stability. By lag middle-
class residents fix~m older neighbor-
hoods, sprawl czr. ates destructive
economic segzegafion and robs those
neighboffioods of the social stability
that will keep them viable. The dis-
tn'bution of income becomes mote
skewed, and it becomes incr~tsin~ly
difficult for low-income people to
· Underutilized or abandoned
investments. Bttsinesses are not the
only entities whose investments can
become stranded when city neigh-
borhoods decline. Individtutl home-
ownen and small shopownen can
also see a stagnation or decline in
property val~es. And this Izend is not
only visible in the inner city. Huge
i~vestments in oldersubasban shop-
ping contort, for example, ate now
perceived as uncompetitive-
· Shifts in poUtical powe' and gov-
ernment servkes- By removing the
middle cle~ of all races from older
connntmities, sprawl makes it easier
behind. Thus, revenues fall and it
becomes mo~ difiicqllt for older
ban--to maintain government ser-
vices, and the incentive for home
ownenhip t~luircd to provide the
foundation for prosperity.
BEYOND SPRAWL
Farmers
Agriculture remains one of Califomia's
leading industries. Yet sprawl continues to
take a. heavy toll on California agriculture
in the following ways.
· A permanent !~s of agricultural
hnd. Between 1982 and 1987, the
Central Valley--California's leading
agricultural region--lost almost a
half-million acres of productive
fartnland. Somc of this land can be
replaced by bringing new land into
ag~cutmral ptoductioe, but often at
cost. Also, many of California's
replacedbylandinotherareas-
Highly productive coastal agricultur-
al lands lost to sprawl cannot be
· A loss in productivity due to
pollution. Sprawl-induced ozone
pollution alone can tedme aop
yields by as much as 30 percent.
According to the Agricultural Issues
Center at UC Davis, pollution-
induced costs to ag~cttlm~ exceed
$200 nnllion per year.
· A decline in farm communities- As
sprawl has eroded agricultural
duction, the effect on farm commu-
cases, rural communities have been
trandormed into bedroom suburbs,
ca~ting destructive commuting pet-
terns while destroying ag~culture
· Long-term uncertaintT. Sprawl
the emptation to "sell out." The
prospect of eventual sale to a devd-
oper t~duces incentives for farmen
to make long-term capial invest-
ments. In many cases, fatmen stay
afloat financially only by hormwing
against the speculative value of their
farm for develoPS a
self-fuffillinS lwoVhec7 of sprawl.
from increased demand for water for
u~oan uses driven by sprawl psttens.
The Environment
Traditional development pariahs have taken
a massive ton on all three basic elemems of
the nannl envitonment:land, air, and water-
BEYOND SPRAWL
· Land: After 50 years of sprawl.
California's metropolitan areus are
enormous, reaching deep into natural
· ecosystems that w~ thriving even a
generation ago. Some 95 percent of
the state's weeands have been
destroyed over the last 200 yean,
thrtaened- Also, California now has
.the highest number of candidate and
listed endangered species of any
state--par~y because sprawl is
diversiv/of biological systems.
Sll~awl makes it mort dilTtcttlt to
resolve these land conservation
ias,.__~e~_ b~/putting tremendous
development pres~trt on the supply
of tanaining open land. lrmally,
.. sprawl compromises one of the most
essential assets of Califomi: ~e
be_~_~_ry and drama of its landscape.
Far fmm being just a luxury, this
value of open space is an important
component in ~ state's ability to
attract and hold wotken and
investors,
· Air: CaUfm~ has the wo~ e
quality in the nation, and air pollu-
tion expazs estimate that a third of
all air pollution emissions are trace-
able to car and truck emissions exac-
er~_e__,d by longer commutes and
higher anto use. The South Coast Air
Quality Management District, which
has the strictest air-pollution rtgula-
air pollution in ~e four-counv/Los
Angeles area costs $7.4 bitlion per
year, or about $600 per rtsident.
Drantatic gains in pollution technol-
ogy are likely to be offset by flirther
sprawl According to air pollution
extezt I.V. Hall, "The benefits of
pollution-rtduction technology can
easily be overwhelmed by our choic-
es about where to live and work,
aboat modes of travel, and about
Inow many miles we driveJ'
· Water:, Sprawl takes a serious toll
on California's watet supply- Fotv/
of the state's 350 groundwater basins
ate seriously ovetttral~t, and water
planners predict that by 2020 the
state wilt face a wate~ supply deffcit
of between 2 million and 8 million
acrt-feeL Though not the sole cause,
inge development does make the
water issue more expensive and
comp~cated to manage.
BEYOND SPRAWL
n the postwar era, the continuous cycle
Of suburban sprawl---counter-produc-
Itive us it was in many ways--~tually
helped to fuel California's prosperiv/, as
consumption of new houses and new cats
became one of the bases of our prosperity.
It is clear, however, that the new California
cannot sustain old patterns of ufoan devel-
opment, if the state is to Fosper in the
The sponsors of this repoa--Bank of
Greenbelt Alliance, and the Low-Income
Housing Fund--firmly believe that
California cannot succeed unless the state
moves beyond sprawl Stro~ policy dirtc-
tion from our political leaders on beth the
state and local level is essential But gov-
ernment policies alone will not help
California move forward. Our businesses,
our community groups, and our citizens
must also take the initiative. We must
understand how sprawl affects each of us
individually, how it impedes the state's
Fogtess, and how it could make a prosper-
ous futmz more diffictt to ghieve..
population growth wrtl requirt some
degree of development on the suburban
fringe. The question is whether we will be
able to use existing urban and suburban
land more efficiently in enier to minimize
sprawl and protect valuable open spaces.
The answen will lie in our ability to attract
housing and tmsinesses to older urban and
subufoan areas and to channd development
on the fzinge to achieve the desired Fotec-
Cagornia businesses cannot compete
globally when they ate baxdened with the
costs of sprawl. An attraaive business cli-
mate cannot be SlBtained if tho qualiv/of
life continues to decline and the cost of
financing real estate development esca-
lates. People in central cities and older sub-
urbs cannot become pan of the btoader
economy if sprawl cxa~innes to encourage
disinvestment, and the state can neither
afford to ignore nor fully subsidize these
California must find a new develop-
meat model We must aule mo~'cxanpa~
and efficient development patterns that
gcommodate growth, 'pet help maintain
Califomia's enviroumetnal balance and its
economic compotitiveness- And we must
encourage everyone in California to pro-
pose and ~t~_~_te solutions to sprawl.
A do-nothing approach, in effect,
constitoles a policy decisi0a in favor of the
satus quo. This, in fact, Ins been the de facto
BEYOND SPRAWL
direction for ~he l~t generation. While the
state and the regions have created a lead-
ership void in this area, many local gov-
ernments have stepped in with their own
policies, which often' have served m pro-
mote sprawl rather titan prevent iL Recent
research has shown that individual local
growth-coutrol policies do nat stop devel-
opment, but merely deflect it---often to
another area further out on the metropolitan
fringe, where the cost of development is
even gr~--t-~. The question is not whether
to address sprawl. The question is how to
addreuiL
In the early 1990's, the California
Legislature convened a conseosos project
on growth management, and in 1991
Governor Wilson formed a cabinet-level
council charged with developing a plan on
how the state should __duress the challenge.
A gear deal of good work was done and
agreement was reached in some areas.
These proces___ses did nat result in legislative
action, but a good foundation of under-
is not meant to be a manual or a t~ctlcal
"how-to" on changing development pat-
terns in California- Rather, it is meant as a
wake-up call to all Californians that the
sprawl issue has a new urgency in the state,
and that all of as can play a role in address-
ing the problem.
To succeed, we will have to set aside
individual interests, build on the founclation
that has been laid, and work for the good of
the whole. We need to xldn:ss sirawl through
community action, public policy, private
business practices, and individual behavior.
It is our intent that the ideas and examples
that follow wilt be used as a betsis for fur-
ther refinement and concerted action.
Fiat, more certaint7 is needed in
delineating where new develol~ment
should and should not occur. Sprawl
occurs partly because current policy
constrains the real estate market by
rewarding 'leapfrog" development driven
on the metropolitan and subtuban fringe-
The alternative is to be more explicit about
conservation and development priorities,
targeting actions and policies for bener
integration of the two.
Using this approach means utilizing
land at the suburban fringe more efficient-
ly and encouraging the reuse of land and
other development opportunities in
already developed areas. It does not mean
stopping growth at the fringe, but doing it at
density levels that will not promote further
sprawl. To succeed, this approach needs
more effective public policies encouraging
such compact growth and removing barri- '
ers to iL
However, the other side of certainty
for developera requires commitments to
conserve ecologically important habitats
and other open space. Accelerating
statewide planning eatforts such aS Natural i
Communities Conservation Planning i
(NCCP), which involves voluntary action i
at the local level and requires consensus !
among development, environmental corn- !
munity and local government '.rotcrests, will
enhance our ability to provide greater
environmental and economic certainty
regarding new development- With its
emphasis on biological assessment, ecosys-
tem protection and compatible economic
devetopment, NCCP can provide much
F. ater certainty to both those who want to
develop their property and those who want
to protect the natural environment- Broader
use of mitigation banks can facilitate mar-
ket-based compensation to landowners who
choose to help protect ecologically valu-
Conservation of other habitat and
open space, such as prime a~icultural land,
will also require us to find creative
approaches like the NCCP process. The
newly established California Envimnzncntal
Resources Evaluation System (CERES)
will help this process by expanding access
Regardless of the methods used, much
of the lesdership for providing greater cer-
tainty for conservation and development
must come faxan the state, regional agen-
cics, and local governments working
together. But private businesses also have a
critical role. Especially in difficult ~conom-
ic times, real estate developers and their
lenders know that certainty of approval and
availability of infrastructure, rather than
speculative leapfrogging, will reduce costs
estate developments can be brought to mar-
kct more quickly and cheaply within ar~s
vation and development have been created.~. .'. .
.,.., ,,.. o/,,.n,, a,s u, .t,.,,,s, be.,,
Older urban and suburban neigh-
borhoods should be reinforced as good
process should take place without dis- .~,;~.~. =~'~._ '~~~.
BEYOND SPRAWL
obsolete, unpleasant, or otherwise unac-
ceptable m those who h~vc the option of
le~ving- The result is a tragic neglect of
th ie and capital invcstznents-
bo peop rhoods must be main-
et hbo
Older n ' g
teincd and improved so they are again
desix~le places to live and work- Old Town
pasadena, the South of Masher area in San
Francisco, and the train depot reconsu~tc-
lion in Sacramento arc all prime examples
of successf~xl restoration projects- Better
=' school systems, job training and access .m
~ capital for small businesses are prefectm'
! sites. '[hese efforts reqtdzc a combination of
government policy initiatives,-active busi-
! · t, and sl~ecial efforts by indi-
i viduals jobs is absututelY critical
~kl~
! Staz and governments should adopt
! land-use and transportation policies that
~ reinforce investments in older neighbor-
i hoods. Incentives must be developed for
: homebuyers, and
job- creating businesses,
othen willing to invest in old~ neighbor-
n be recycl f .
m g
Investore can make tax credits. Wid=r use:
tow income bousiag
i credits or other incentives can be estab-
lished for lelldilg and cq.uity investments
that support small businesses and job ~
es infres~ pollution and social costs
well in excess of assessed develOPment
fees. Xf we rationalize development and
conttol the co~ts of sprawl, it ~ flee up
capital that can be reinvested into existing
Older communities themselves
to make their neighborhoods attractive
~ to job creating and housing investments-
they need protection from frivolous envi-
reomcntal and product liabilitY suits.
The closing of military bases in
California offers interesting potential for
development. Bases have substantial
potential as alternatives to building houses
and job centers on the suburban fringe.
While there ate problems associated with
redeveloplag many bases, they also have
excellent potential for showcasing how to
~esotve difficult uz~n rebuilding
Third, a legal a.d proceduraZ
fram~ork shouM be established ~o cr~at~
the d~sired c~rminr~ aad send the righ~
economic signals to inwestors- Four ele-
ments ate neetied-
(a) Where development is allowed.
state and local permitting should be
srreandined. This is cxitical to encotra~mg
development in ufoan and otdgr subuzban
azus- It may reelulre changes to legislation
Co) Deve[lopmenz at the rnen'°P°lit[~a~
· · should be required to pay the
· busitt. ss strace o ~ those develoP-
often inexpensive
ments pay for local infzastruem~, but do
not pay the fult cost of constructing roadS.,
tonmental I'robterns' on those
irabalances- lxnposiag such costs
! developments would discourage sPrawL
For example, the citY of Lancss~
an innovative program that rec~uire. s new
development to pay capital and operating
Development fur-
costs of infrastructure. while develoP-
ther out pays its full cost,
ment that is closer to the citY' s center pays
i nuch tess' since it is fied in to existing citY
Agsin, this is atsskthatrectuixesth~
Indivkhnis and communitY g~oup in those
areas should redouble their efforts to active pafticipstion of both government
improve the qtnlitY of ufoan life in small and business- Fer example, many govern-
meut agencies, such as water suPPliers,
· ~ -
le, by form~g commarelY- 1 subsidize development on %~
based unity developmen i sm~ctute across ' disc~m.~
"=':' ' ': ~ '~es t in n~mtaining neightx~nood thcxis ~ petitire ~vantege ov P ~n~'o~d az~ made
~.~:.:'~~ .... ~';*=: vices ~so if de F . ~, ~ o~cr
beginning--would also discourage sprawl by
including the full assessment of environmen-
tal cost in private real estate transactions.
(c) California's local governments
should encourage more efficient and coor-
dinated local land-use policies. Sprawl has
been encouraged by tax revenue competi-
tion among local governments for some
land uses. such as retail centers, and by
slow-growth policies that discourage other
land uses, such as housing.
Development patterns that are now
truly regional are being created almost
completely by an accumulation of local
decisions. But some local governments are
beginning to show that it is possible to
work together toward consistent land-use
policies when given the incentive to do so.
In planning for the reuse of closed military
bases. for example. local governments are
forming "joint powers authorities" in
which many jurisdictions work together
toward a common goal
The vast majority of Californians
choose to locate in large metropolitan
axeas. But most of these people live in
small. politically independent suburban
jurisdictions. These local governments
must work together toward a consistent set
of land-use policies--such as discouraging
development on the metropolitan fringe
and reinforcing investments in transit
systems--that will enhance economic
opportunity and quality of life across the
entire metropolitan area. Joint powers
authorities, such as those c~ated for mill-
tar,/base reuse, should be viewed as one
model for cooperative planning, and others
{d) Technological change should
be tiled to combat sprawl rather than
encourage it. In the past, technological
advancements (such as automobiles and
government-sponsored freeways) have sup-
potted sprawl. requiring expensive afzer-the-
fact government action of questionable
value (such as ridesharing requirements).
Today we stand at the threshold of a new
teclmological era that offers the oiFrmni~
to have more work done at home and in
local communities. We must take advan-
rage of the oppommities presented by the
information superhighway to improve our
land-use patterns rather than further
destroy them.
For example, the information super-
highway could end up encouraging a further
dee=nnlin~on of jobs to the ntr,~o~olim
hinge. F-tt~ of a daily commute to a large
employment center, some individuals and
BEYOND SPRAWL
small businesses will seek to locate in dis-
rant suburbs and travel back to older urban
centers to do business as needed. This trend
could put more pressure on land at the
fringe.
However, the telocommunications rev-
olution can also hold the potential for
reviving economically troubled areas.
Because of its locational flexibility,
telecommunications can provide new job.
prospects for older urban neighborhoods
and for rural towns. Both government poli-
cy and private business practice should
encourage the use of telecommunications
to reinforce existing communities rather
Fourth, we should forge a consti~n-
q to build sustainable commtmiaes. Past
efforts to reduce sprawl have been ham-
perea because litde constituency exists
beyond groups of government reformers,
some local government leaders, community
groups, and conservationisis. But, as this
report suggests, many other players in
California's future will also trmd them-
selves increasingly stifled by sprawl.
Political alliances must be forged between
environmentalists, inner-city community
advocates, business leaders, government
experts, farmers, and suburbanires to
improve the quality of life in all our exist-
ing communities and protect our re. sources.
This will not be an easy task. Most of
these groups are focused on their specific
agendas and often harbor animosity toward
each other even though alliances make
long-term strategic sense.
But it is possible. For example,
enviromnentalists concerned about devel-
opment at the suburban fringe have
tremendous opportunities to work with
governments and community organizations
seeking to im:rease investment in more
central urban areas. Farmers seeking a
long-term future in agriculture near an
urban area can form very effective
alliances with those working to protect
resources. Community groups, government
agencies. and builders can explore new
marketing and funding options that support
taking advantage of the huge demand for
changing demographics. Taxpayers con-
c~ued about the inefficiency of governmen-
tomakebetteruseofinfrasmacnn~inexist-
ing uxban areas. Tbe~are literally dozens of
We must act now. The decisions we
make in the next few years will determine
California's future course---and its chances
for succc,~. To build a strong economy and
retain a good quality of life for the 21st
Century, we must move beyond sprawl to a
new vision of community in the few
r~maining years of the 20th Century. ·
B of A says sprawl
bad for California
The bank backs aca one. court barnes
state report urgin
new requirements for
land developers.
· In a rare agreement among
.'warring Interests, the Bank of
America Joined with advocates of
,. open space and ioW-txmt housing
.. yesterday to warn mat Californli's
. runaway sprawl is bad for brad-
,. flea8,
· .. The ~l~!at to the suburbs that
.. fueled the state's economy for 50
.' years is now creating enormous
costs, said a report by Bank of
America, the Greenbelt Alliance,
· . the Low Income Housing Fund and
the state Resources Agency.
-.. "When you talk about leap-frog-
ging development that takes you
out to Trncy and Modesto, those
· home buyers may do all rlfht,"
said Richard Morrison, Bank of
.Z America senior vice president of
environmental policy.
"B,Jt that's because other people
· .- are deaiing with the expense of ah.
pollution and building highway and
: pay for it."
. Although the groups contribut-
ins to the report come from differ-
ent perspectives, Morrison said,
"we all agree that, if we don't deal
· with urbnn sprawl, Sooner or liter
California won't be such a pleasant
· place to live."
The report, prepared for the
state Little Hoover Commimion,
said counties should require devel-
opers of prom on the od2e of
urban arem to pay the ftdl cust of
building new roeads, extem,~g .wa-
ter lines and implementin2 mea-
sures to protect the envtronment.
· fives to pot money and resources
into central cities and. older sub-
uria especially where it would
· create new ~ the report said.
The report was born out of
frustration with the l~.,2~vMl~ire's
failure over the last two yesrs to
deal with the Mato's burgeonin2
· population.
2iomfi plans that de~l~te .zones'
for development and conmr., ~atkm.
.-In ereas of devetopmant, the per-
.. mlt process ,would be sinmmlined.
But nothi~ lass been introduced
for this leave session, said
· Larry Ornum, director of Green-
· belt Alliance in San Francisco,
whme 2roup supports relionai
.o plans.
Lenders such ss Bank of Amerl- !
executive omcer of the Mato'S
larSest bank, Save the report full
support.
RusenberS SiSnod a letter with
Oman, aesuurces Secrelm~DouS
Wheelel' and Doalel I~ibSOhn Of
the Low Income Housing Fund
warning that "unfettered sprawl
wlll make the state less cornpert-
five, burdan taximyers with hiSher
costs, deemde the environment
and lower the quall~ of life for
every Caitfomina.".
Amoag the $roups vlc~mlml by
sprawl, according to the report:
· Taxpayers. Hi2hways must be
buUt and maintained to serve dis-
liar suburbs. ~ problems fes-
ter in abandoned older neiShbor-
hoods. 'Solving environmental.
problems of develogment such us
air sad water poliutioa aml loss of
wefiaads and e,tds,t~ved species
are expensive.
itY of life, California is a less
desirable location for budhess
owners and potential employees.
Worke~ must commute ions dis-
can't ~et there at all Business
investments in abandoned nelSh-
· Residents in new suburbs.
The avera2e Californian spends $I
out of e~,y 25 of income on
buyinS and rp,,int~b~ their crux
ManY conunuters spend an hour or
more adaYonthe mad. Suburban
home buyers* taxes 2o to pay off
bonds tlmt sume developers use to
· Residentsofcentmicitiesand
older suburbs. They cannot com-
mute to suburban jobs without a
cm'. A8 b,~,: Ms and
leave for new suburbs, older nelB!i-
makin8 it mere dimcult to main-
· The envtronnMnt Develop.
ment sabbles up open space that
protects water supp
.... nm, wetmnds,
forests and wildlife..
:,'~,
!. ;,..
,f ,
HU
'Report;Finds
'A/ninistfa~on join ~nvironn~nislists in' :; ... '.
'uniiual alllenin Authors say, the tcono.'.m~', "'
de!~nd~ on smarter dgVilopit~nL',' '... ~'~., .:!:! :'
By FRANK CLIFFORD! : ": ....' ' · · ~ ~ ' ~ ':
TIMEl ENVIRONMENTAl, WIITE~ ' ..... ' .' "' ,
Per years environmenial Erou!~ h'ave '~rEuecl 1~
litiJe effect that' ~uhurhan' ~rawl hurls. ~,8li!~mt~,' '
Now. tl~e Wilson Adminislra~on and Bank: of
Ere lendlnil new welEht to the Ergumenl~ makinE the
~ that the siate's eharactemu.~ Erow.t .~.~.'.bN~ .
had for the environment and the economy," ....., .,"i ·
In a report to I~ rtleiled todil]t, In. Ilnljlu8|
that infiudu such I~ni~hrles of the !~lL-Worlci WI~
II i~ulatiod boom El Bask 0f Anleflea ¢~/li~ludll Lha~ :'.
future growth should aYoid .new Iprawl to' l~rol~"'.'
California freE/further harm," · .' "· ' .' ""'"" ": .'
"Sprawl ~ompromis~ one of. the rao~t
"lan/e~l~," .~he rc,~rt sinus, "C, Elifornia' bu/ne~,~.. ·
., t~lll~L' Eon!l~te'~!obsllY when the~y Ere burdened! wtl~ .'
.,J; '~of.~mwL"'- .: !',, ..:' c..7, .!.'i.?:~;,:~i~..'. ,' ::., ."
~e. !t!~orL binroll the "d~ll'~/~tion"of I~ ~! thee
· ~'i~,te's Itianc~ on subUnman iprawl an~! eontendl
one-lhird ot all air IN:lllutlon il lzaae~ble to"'~r a/~&~/"
Lt~k emlslon~ e~eerbsted by IonEar ~ommutHT'
.: ~l~e~llial~l by the ErewinE dil'.lS~.e~ b~L~Nn. hem '
"and work'. ' ' ' · · . ' '
' Yet the t'e[mrt's authorl inlillL ~rlelrl il !!eL a eEli f0.r :' ,,-.
· , limitinn 'growth,' l~ther, they ~, ~L If. il ~lfll
~';'.~C~l|[ornia t0 I~ smarter about how It E~/w~.--t~ in~enL' '
:; '. wE~s we ein erelie ~ompsat and ef~fient E~.'wtlL" './; ' :;'.
;':' 'Sprlwl wEi 8floralable; the r~.l~ort'iEYs,;il'lonll
the suppl), of ahesp: land w~ .sb~lndant' and '~ove~rff~ :. "'.
' ment ~Eene4~ and priYate bu/ne~es. were able ~ ':
".' rant the demEncl for alfordable hoines willie I~iY
t~':... lot'the ros~, schools, water systoms,:'sewall~ In'eaCh' ':
i, .ment !~lanls and gu and el~trla lin~ that each ~e1~' ':"':'
development requiNd,'- ~ ' ' ' ' :~'Zt ' '. ',..,: .' i.
'.. ',.- BUt within the Imlt feElration, the taper ~in~.'" ':
~..." e.lx~twsr formull for iu~ l~l l~Eome oYe~
:t~be¢~aie. morG c'onE~tecl0. the" ~s~ply of "dave oi~l~t~ · · '
"'~11~i h~ dwindl~fi, and because'. of tk~reasing 'eerie,. ;.
':. with the d~raand lot publie Nrvi~e." "' ' ' ': - ;' '. :' - '
W
printed by Bank' orAmeriea, the Wilmn'Adminl~ta~! !.
tion'~ Bamurc-~' Al~an~Y, the 8an" rranfi~-ba~."~",
Grinbelt Alliance and. the ,nonprofif
Hot~ingl~unc!: · · :.'~ Z '. '. "."'-'.. ,, "
l/~a '
· ~'he intent of the Nl~ort l~ to promote 'stat~ and; '
~". governm~t polifi¢~ ti~t will di~ourage the lasttern
'~ · leaplro~ development that h~ didlanes! l~ople frolti
;:.'.:,url~n centers, while. aEEravating traf~c~ ~ongOt~
:' and air pollution. - ' · ~,.
.:.. "~n t~ ~,-the armiment a~..i It [~rawi]
Ix~n ~ pm~ly in enVironmenial terror': Doug~
:-i~ WhNler, t!~ mate'S. ~iary of r~muraa;.;ml ~ ·
. Menflay. "Unfortunately; that w~s n~t an ErEumen~l:.°
:..: ' .tmpli~ation~, anti with b~inm getting involved in
'.. ~, ther~ ~ a real opl~rtunlty for risEnEe-'-' ~.: ~ ,' :v
· The. rel~.rt'underNor~ ,the hailer areonE "~0fiie
..... · ·- ... ,"~ '~-.
.~. i[thequalityof!ifec'ontinu~tod~'-lineiandthee~to~'
"tinanfing real ~tate .development ~ealate~,".,
~l~r mt~. "By Nfiueing the quality of life. ~raWl
']'-h~ mad. e~llfornii-a Im d~lrable io~atio~ .fo~' ."t
f - lm~ln~ own~r~ and ix~htifi emplo:yN~." ~ .. · ......
· 'I'Ve al~eel 'of California luburl~n living. fad~l'~.:
.. n~w home buyer~ feel the 'welEht of °hew L.l~L~o , '!
·ine. re~fingly n~ry t~' ~over tnfmtruetuf~
· .a~eor~tng to the rei~rt- °~rh~-addltional Iax~ olten.
havG the eff~t of doubling 'a new hom~oiner*~ .
..propertylixbili,"ther~l~ortsteto. -' - , ';. ',~
,~he r~ort ~iio~.the me long made by"firha, "'.'.
that the inane economic and' ~o~a~ ..~
imlation of older fity'.-n~lghhorhood~ l~ linit~! '.~
roburban ~rawi, toying B/t it ha~ taken away.JolNa.
|,ve,tment ea~lial.' Nlitleal power and' go~'~m.~en,~ "
pLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JUNE 15, 1994
area next to it, would berural in nature. If desired, they could
draw those parcels out of the plan, but it would be better to
acknowledge that they are there and do things within the plan to
respond to their concerns.
Commissioner Kelley said it appeared that there was an impasse
between the applicant and the Planning Department. The staff
report recommends a denial, and the applicant appeared to be
leaning towards a continuance. Mr. Burnell said he understood that
the applicant was not convinced that there should bea general plan
amendment for this area. They were trying to work on suggestions
made on the plan in terms of the overall concept, and address the
technical issues, such as the Board's policy on drainage. Also,
they wanted to address the concerns of the people living in the
area, and the issue of compatibility- They strongly believed that
it was appropriate to look at the long term future of the area, and
respond to the owners of the property who were in support of the
kind of effort the proponents were making. They would like the
Commission to comment on where they are now, and what they have
done in terms of the land plan. Then, they could work on the plan,
bring it back to staff, and return at a future Commission hearing~
}is. Laurence advised t~at staff's concern was that this project was
premature for the area, and staff could not support a general plan
amendment at this time. That concern overrides all the other
details associated with this plan. She asked whether the
Commission felt that this item was premature also, and therefore
should not go forward. Or, does the Commission feel that this plan
was appropriate~ if so, then it would be reasonable to continue
this item so that the applicant could refine the plan and bring it
forward.
Commissioner Kelley said on November 17, 1993, when this matter
first came to the P~anning Commission, there was a suggestion by
staff that this matter be bifurcated. Also, that the Planning
Commission express an opinion as to the GPA, whether negative or
positive, so that recommendation could go to the Board. Then the
· Board based on the recommendation from the Commission, could make
a recommendation on the work robedone on the specific plan. This
would allow the applicant to save his money, time and so forth, and
would give a clear idea regarding the GPA. At that time, she
indicated her support of Planning staff's recommendation that this
was a premature project. The applicant has not presented anything
to change her position since that November 17th hearing. If the
applicant wishes to proceed, he does so with his "eyes wide open."
The question before the Commission was whether the Commission was
comfortable with the GPA, as she waspersonally not comfortable for
the reasons she expressed on November 17th. General Plans and
Community Plans are used as tools to quide future development, and
they must be flexible enough and strong enough to serve their
4O
pLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JUNE 15, 1994
purpose. There have been discussions in and about the community
and, in her mind, mere approval of projects in that area does not
carry the same weight as development. The general plan, along with
guiding valuable development, also has to protect established rural
communities- The general plan that relies on approved projects
that have not been built does not have sufficient weight to go
forward. Circumstances have not changed sufficiently in that area
to merit a general plan amendment at this time.
Commissioner Kelley said the specific plans in that area are
that does not yet exist. Currently, there are no exist g
in the French Valley/Lake Skinner area. If they rely on paper
cities, then they will be building on a "house of cards," which
neither reasonable nor productive.
Commissioner Kelley said Mr. Birdsall made a comment regarding
something she has always been concerned with, and that was
piecemeal development. If they approve a specific plan, they allow
phasing, which means not all infrastructure is built at the front
end. What that does is piecemeal an area. They have a specific
plan with urban intent, and people move into the area expecting
urban services. Ofteh the area is so far removed from the core of
existing services that it puts a great burden on the County system
to serve those residents. That creates great frustration for
newcomers and for those already living in the County, who have to
accept diluted services. In summary, she agreed with staff that
this project was premature.
Commissioner Kelley said in all fairness to the proponent and
applicant, she believed that it would be far better to accept the
recommendation of the Planning staff to deny the project and send
it on to the Board. If the Board chooses, they can approve the
CGPA, send the project back for further work and analysis, or they
can also deny the CGPA.
· Commissioner Roth agreed with Commissioner Kelley. He was
interested in' planning bayond where they were today, and talked to
the Planning Director about advance planning, which needs to be
done. In fairness to the people who bought into this area
believing that they w~uld have a large lot development, there
should be some period of time where they could rely on that.
Essentially what the CGPA is attempting to do is move the boundary
of the SWAP out, or change the designations, which he felt was
inappropriate and premature. He would like to see more advance
planning, and consistency with a map that informs people about what
can or cannot be done. He believed that Commissioner Kelley hit
the essence of the concerns.
Mr. Burnell said at this point he understood how the Commissioners
41
pLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JUNE 15, 1994
felt and ~heir concerns about the project. He saw no value in
bifurcating the project because he would prefer that the entire
project be denied and sent on to the Board. He said SWAP did say
something about this area, but then the City of Temecula came into
being and general planned that area differently, which was what
they were responding to. Agriculture cannot go on much longer in
this area.
The hearing was closed at 2:31 p.m.
MOTION: Upon motion by Commissioner Kelley, seconded by
Commissioner Roth and duly carried (Commissioner Canady was
absent), the Commission recommended tentative denial of Specific
Plan No. 286, Comprehensive General plan Amendment No. 306, Change
of Zone 5932, and further recommended that the Board not grant the
cancellation of the agricultural preserve contract based on
discussions by Commissioners Kelley and Roth-
coue~cial, Z0 es o~ pa:ks; one 10-acre school site, 27.3 ac~es
~ e Y 274 ? ac~es
~ UEST: Change ~e n Space and Consedation Map designation
City~enifee Val y . . .
Hearing was o~n~ at 2:41 p.m. and w continued to 2:00 p.m. on
August 10, 1994, -
Staff said~is item hasten continued a n r of times in order
to resoZve a n,,~r of issues, s~cifically h regard to flood
control concerns, parks, sch~ls, fiscal iapac~ a lysis, a ~raffic
study, ~e ~atcatcher and ~e SP zoning text,n~r of ~e
concerns havens resolved, withes only outstandin issue ~ing
~e traffic and ~atca~cher studies- Since ~e wri~ g of the
staff re~rt, s~ff received a completed~a~ca~cher surv froa a
biol~is~ certified by the S~ate, and it has ~en determin tha~
~ere ~e no gnatcatchers on the site, The traffic study has
yet~en cleared byte Trans~rta ' , ' '
42
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
JUNE 15, 1994
The time being12:21 p.m., the Commission recessed for lunch, after
which the meeting reconvened with all Commissioners previously
seated noted present. Commissioner Canady was absent.
(AGENDA ITEM 5.1 - Tapes 2B, 3A)
SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 286 - EIR 374 - Winchester 1800 Landowners -
French Valley and Skinner Lake Areas - Third Supervisorial District
1,450.1~ east of Pourroy Rd and Winchester Rd, south of
Keller RdTc~%~ of Washington St and north of Auld Rd, with an
additional'160 acres south of Thompson Rd, west of Pourroy Rd, and
north of Benton Rd - PROJECT: A Planned Mixed-use Development
comprised of 5,806 dwelling units on 1,450.1 acres, with densities
ranging from 0.35 to 15.0 dwelling units per acres~ 94.2 acres of
commercial, 10.9 acres of medical office/facilities~ 44.0 acres of
parks~ four school sites totalling 52 acres~ 135.9 acres of open
space~ and 123 acres devoted to roads with CHANGE OF ZONE 5932 -
From R-R-2~, A-1-5, R-A-2~, A-1-2~, R-T-2~ and A-1-15 to SP and
GENERAL PLANAMEND)~EWTNO- 306 - REQUEST: Amend the Open Space and
Conservation Map designation from "Areas Not Designated as Open
Space" and "Agriculture" to "Specific Plan No. 286"= to amend the
Southwest Area Community Plan Land Use Allocation Map from
-Residential with 2~ acre minimum lot sizes" "Residential, with
2 to 4 dwelYing units per acre," and -AgriCulture" to "Specific
Plan No 286"' and to amend the Land Use and Circulation Elements
of the' General ~lan and AGRICULTURAL PRESERVE CASE NO. 737
(ContractCancellations and Diminishment of Winchester Agricultural
Preserve No. 5) - Coscan/Steward partnership - French ValleyArea -
Third Supervisor.~al D.~str.ict {Cont. from ~/~3/94~ (RJM}
Hearing was opened at 1:34 p.m. and was closed at 2:31 p.m.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Denial of Specific Plan No. 286,
Comprehensive General Plan Amendment No. 306 and Change of Zone
· 5932, based on the findings and conclusions listed in the staff
report. Staff noted that Agricultural Preserve No. 737 was before
the Board. Mr. MacHott said at the February 23rd meeting, staff
spelled out a number of concerns, beth with the project design and
consistency with the General Plan. Subsequent to the last hearing,
staff has received nothing from the applicant with regard to a
redesign of the project. Staff evaluated the project based on the
SWAP policies and the General Plan. Unless the applicant
redesigned the project to be consistent with the rural designation
of SWAP for that property located on the east side of Pourroy,
staff could not support the project.
33
ITEM 22
TO,'
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROV
CITY ATTORNI~~
FINANCE OFFIC
CITY MANAGE
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning~'~Tr
March 28, 1995
Status Report on Klassic Shotz Billiards, Planning Application No. PA94-0043
Prepared By:
Craig D. Ruiz, Assistant Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
Receive and File
BACKGROUND
On August 23, 1994, the City Council approved a conditional use permit for the Klassic Shotz
Billiards. In approving the project, the Council instructed staff to come back with a status
report regarding complaints at the site within six months of the approval.
To date, staff has received one letter of complaint from Ester Downer, owner of the Q club
billiards parlor (See Attachment No. 1 ). In her letter, Ms. Downer expressed concern that the
condition of approval requiring minors to vacate the premises by 10:00 p.m. was not being
enforced. As stated in staff's reply, the City had not received any complaints regarding
Klassic Shotz (See Attachment No. 1 ). Staff also stated that if Ms. Downer wished to file a
formal complaint, the Code Enforcement Officer would then investigate. To date, no formal
complaints have been received from Ms. Downer. The Police Department, to date, has
received one service call to this location (See Attachment No. 2). The service was for an
audible alarm.
Attachments:
Letter of Complaint and Staff Response - Page 2
Temecula Police Department Service Memo - Page 3
Applicant's Letter - Page 4
R:\STAFFRPTV,3PA~r,-1.CC :~/20/95 ktb 1
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
LETTER OF COMPLAINT AND STAFF RESPONSE
R:\STAFFRPT\~3PA9~-I.CC 3/20/95 ktb 2
November 10, 1994
Mr. S. Munoz, Councilman
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Dr.
Temecula, CA 92590
PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL
Mr. MUnoz,
When the City issues a "Conditional Use Permit" with conditions
such as Klassic Shotz Billiards: "Np Alcohol Beverage" and
"No one under 18 years old after 10PM" how does the City ensure
that their conditions are being upheld?
For example, if you go to Klassic Shotz Billiards, you would
not know no one under 18 is not allowed after 10PM. It is not
on all the doors, posted inside or announced nightly. Should
it not be prominently posted on all entry doors? The police
say they do not enforce or check on the cities restrictions on
"use permits." Shouldn't they?
Also I read in THE CALIFORNIA}] (copy enclosed) that they "had no
intention of ever attempting to sell alcohol." However, a few
days ago two police personnel visited my business to make a
comparison as Klassic Shotz Billiards was going to re-apply to
sell alcohol. I guess ever must be 2 months. That's about ho~
long they have been open.
You know the City Planning Dept. must complete a form for the
Alcohol Beverage ConTrol as part of an applicant application
package. Maybe the Temecula Planning Dept. should be advised
of the restriction on this business at this location. Mrs. Smedley's
representative, who gave the assurances at the City Council
meeting, Mr. Ken Wade, is the brother of Mr. Bruce Wade owner of
High Society Billiards. The Wades previously operated Family
Billiards of Ramona, CA, and Family Billiards of Lake Elsinore, CA.
It would be of interest to check the police reports on these two
operations.
Respectfully,
Esther A. Down
27911 Front St. #104
Temecula, CA 92590
"4 i Cityo'fTemecula; ,.'.'t..,.
4-3174 Business Park Drive · Temecula. California 92590 19o9l 69~1989 - FAX (9o~l
December 19, 1994
Esther A. Downer
Q Club
279 11 Front Street//104
Temecula, CA 92590
Subject:
Klassic Shotz B{lliard~/~A~4-0043
At the request of Councilmember Mufioz, I would like to reply to your leiler dated November 10,
1994. First, with regards to the enforcement of conditions of approval for the above referenced
project, the City's Code Enforcement Officer is responsible for enforcing violations of conditions.
However, the Code Enforcement Office operates on a complaint basis. To date, no complaints have
been filed against this project.
Second, as you correctly suu~ in your let~r, the approval of Klassic Shotz did not allow the selling of
alcohol. If the owner of Klassic Shotz wants to sell alcohol, she would need to file an application
with the City for an amendment to their Conditional Use Permit (CLIP). The City does not have the
ability to prohibk the filing of such an application. However, if such an application were filed, the
City Council would have the authority to approve or deny the amendment.
Third, the Plmnning Department is aware of the no alcohol provisions of the CUP. If Klassic Shotz
were to apply for an alcohol selling license with the Deparunent of Alcohol Beverage Control (ABC),
the applicant would be required to supply the following information: 1) Requirement for a CUP to
sell alcohol, 2) The date the CUP was approved, and 3) Name of person contacted with the City.
Then, as pan of the ABC review process, the City contact person is contacted to verify the
information. The Plmn-lng Depa~uuent feels that this process provides for adequate safeguards for
anyone trying to circumvent the CUP process.
I hope this letter run,wets any questions you may have regarding the Klassic Shotz project. ~hould you
have any questions concerning the above information, please contact Craig Ruiz of the
Deparunent at (909) 694-6400.
Sincerely, '"
/
Gary Thornhill
Director of pIarmi. E
cc: City Manager/City Council
R:~PLANN~G~HOT'/,LTI 12;19/9~ ~
! l~rznlecl on Recyclecl Pa~er.
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
TEMECULA POLICE DEPARTMENT SERVICE MEMO
R:\STAFFRPT\~3PAWe-I.CC 3120195 ktb 3
Thursday Hatch 16, 1995~3:16;m -- From ,71/,69/,A567' -- Page 2A
City of Temecula
Temecula Police Department
March 16, 1995
Calls for Service
Kisssic Shotz Batlards
For the calendar year 1994, them was one call for service at 41915 Motor Car
Parkway. That carl was an audible alarm.
In 1995, year to date. there have been no cab for service generated froe this
address.
This address, Includes suites A, B and C, commonlY known as K!assic Shotz
Billiards.
Police Officer
Temecula Police Department
(909) 696-3000
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
APPLICANT'S LETTER
R:\STAFFRPT\&~PA94.-1.CC 3120195 kLb 4
Development Cormultant~
March 15, 1995
Gary Thornhill, Planning Director
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
Subject:
Klassic Shotz Billiards
City Council Six Months Status Review
March 28, 1995
#663
ECEIVEU
CITY OF TEMECULA
Dear Gary:
I would like to confirm that the Klassic Shotz review is on agenda
for March 28, 1995 and that included with that request is
consideration of the deletion of the requirement in the resolution
not be permitted to apply for an alcohol license. The intention of
Klassic Shotz is to apply for a beer consumption license with the
provision that NO ONE ONDER 21 YEARS OF AGE be permitted in the
establishment regardless of hours of operation.
This should allay the concerns of the opponents at the public
hearing that were concerned about the combination of alcohol sales
taking place in the presence of minors under the age of 18.
Klassic Shotz has established a beautiful state of the art
facility, as can be evidenced by an inspection, which we would
encourage staff to conduct. They have established a fine
reputation with no problems to date. Please make sure that this
request is included in the Staff Report for the 28th.
Sincerely,
MARKHAM & ASSOCIATES
Lar~/R. Markham
Principal
]
LRM/jag
cc: Ken Wade
c: \wpdocs\Joyce\klassic. 663
41750 Winchester Road, Suite N · Temecula, California 92590 · (909) 676-6672 · FAX (909) 699-1848
ITEM 23
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
March 28, 1995
Consideration of Adoption of Resolution Approving a Master Property
Tax Exchange Agreement Between the City of Temecula and the
County of Riverside Upon Annexations of Territory to the City
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a Resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 95-
'A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE MASTER PROPERTY TAX TRANSFER
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND THE COUNTY OF
RIVERSIDE UPON ANNEXATIONS OF TERRITORY TO THE CITY'
BACKGROUND: Pulte Homes Corporation has submitted to the Local Agency
Formation Commission a request for annexation of certain territory to the City of
Temecula. Pulte proposes to annex a part of the "Silverhawk" project to the City.
Under the provisions of California Revenue and Taxation Code Section 99, the City
and County must agree upon a transfer of real property tax in order for annexations to be
effective. The City and County may do so on a project-by-project basis, or may enter into
a Master Real Property Tax Transfer Agreement in order to avoid negotiating property tax
exchange for each project. Because Revenue and Taxation Code Section 99 only allows a
30-day period to conclude the negotiations on property tax exchange or the annexation is
terminated, a master property tax exchange agreement has its merits. Pulte has requested
that the City adopt the Master Property Tax Transfer Agreement.
ORANGE:31T2.1
The Agreement generally provides that when the City of Temecula assumes the
service responsibilities for fire service in the territory to be annexed, that the City would
receive 100% of the property tax revenue allocated for fire protection. The Agreement
also provides that when the City assumes service responsibility for the provision of library
services for the areas that are annexed, the City would receive 100% of the property tax
revenue generated and collected by the County for the provision of library services.
As to the balance of "general municipal services," the Agreement also provides that
the City would receive 25% of the property tax revenue from the area subject to the
annexation of that portion of property tax revenue which is currently dedicated to the
provision of County services, Puite represents to the City that this is a "standard" property
tax exchange agreement between cities and counties in Riverside County for the transfer
of property taxes, Furthermore, Pulte's representatives have stated to the City that the
County would be willing to execute such an Agreement, :
In the event, future annexations appear to have a financial cost associated with
them which would make them a financial burden to the City, the City may repeal this
Resolution and negotiate a property tax exchange agreement on a project-by-project basis.
In the event the future annexations are financially favorable to the City, adoption of this
Agreement allows the annexation process to be streamlined.
FISCAL IMPACT: The proposed property tax allocation is the same as the existing
property tax structure within the City limits.
ATTACHMENTS: A Resolution approving the Master Property Tax Transfer Agreement.
ORANOE:3172.1
The Agreement generally provides that when the City of Temecula assumes the
service responsibilities for fire services in the territory to be annexed, that the City would
receive 100% of the property tax revenue allocated for fire protection, The Agreement
also provides that when the City assumes service responsibility for the provision of library
services for the areas that are annexed, the City would receive 100% of the property tax
revenue generated and collected by the County for the provision of library services.
As to the balance of "general municipal services," the Agreement also provides that
the City would receive 25% of the property tax revenue from the area subject to the
annexation of that portion of property tax revenue which is currently dedicated to the
provision of County services. Pulte represents to the City that this is a "standard" property
tax exchange agreement between cities and counties in Riverside County for the transfer
of property taxes. Furthermore, Pulte's representatives have stated to the City that the
-County would be willing to execute such an Agreement.
In the event, future annexations appear to have 8 financial cost associated with
them which would make them a financial burden to the City, the City may repeal this
Resolution and negotiate a property tax exchange agreement on a project-by-project basis.
in the event the future annexations are financially favorable to the City, adoption of this
Agreement allows the annexation process to be streamlined.
FISCAL IMPACT: City of Temecula share of the County General Fund is 25% which
equal to 4.075% of the Property Tax. City of Temecula share of the Fire Protection is
100% which is equal to 6,705% of the Property Tax. Fiscal impacts of individual projects
to be annexed to the City will be evaluated on a case by case basis.
ATTACHMENTS: A Resolution approving the Master Property Tax Transfer Agreement.
ORANGE: 3172.1
-2-
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THF~ CITY OF
~, C~,IJFORNIA, APPROVING ~ MASTER PROPERTY
TAX TRANSFER AGI~IENT B~,-~'wb:~2~T THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AND THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE UPON
ANNEXATIONS OF TERRITORY TO THE CITY
WH~'URA~, the County of Riverside and the City of Temecula are the agencies
whose public services would be affected by any annexation to the City of Temecula; and,
WvH~EAS, ~tatives of the County and the City have met and negotiated an
exchange for property tax revenue to become effective for areas annexed to the City
begjnnlng July 1, 1995; and,
Wln~E~S, this exchange for propcaty tax revenue is in the best interest of the
citizens of the City of Temecula; and,
W!~EAS, Section '99(d) of the C,~!ifornia Revenue and Taxation Code now
provides for adoption of a master property tax transfer agreement, which agreement may be:
revised from time to time by the parties; and,
WHEREAS, the adoption of such an agreement would contribute to a reduction in
paperwork and to an increase in efficiency; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Temecula desires to enter into a master
property tax transfer agreement with the County of Riverside.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEM~CULA
DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. When the City of Temecula assumes the sePtice responsibilities for the
suppression and prevention of structural fires in annexed areas, for such assumption of
services the City shall receive 100% of that portion of the property tax revenue generated
within the territory annexed and collected by the County of Riverside as a structural fire
protection tax.
Section 2. When the City of Temecula assumes the service responsibility for the
provision of library services to annexed areas, for such service assumption the City shall
receive 100% of that portion of the property tax revenue generated within the territory
annexed and collected by the County of Riverside for provision of library services.
ORAN~E:27~5.1
Section 3. The City of Temecula shall assume the respon~ility for providing all
other general municipal services to areas to be annexed, and for such service ~,,mption the
City shah receive 259~ of that portion of the Fropet ty tax revenue generated within the
territory to be annexed under the ad valorera tax rate established by Article ~rt& of the
Constitution of the State of California that represents the County of Riverside's share of such
property tax revenue.
Section 4. The County Auditor is hereby requested to convert the above established
percentage figures into actual dollars, and thereaftn' to allocate such property tax revenue in
accordance with the provisions of Section 95 et see. of the California Revenue and Taxation
Code.
Section 5. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby agrees to the exchange
of property tax revenue set forth above and approves this master property tax agreement with
the County.
Section 6. The City Clerk shall transmit a certified copy of this Resolution to the
Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, to the Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation
Commission, and to the Riverside County Auditor pursuant to California Revenue and
Taxation Code Section 99.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this day of
,1995.
Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
ORA~GE:27JJ.1
2
STATE OF CALf!:ORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE)
crrY oF Tmd~'~JLA)
SS
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, IIRRPRy DO CERTIFY that
the foregoing Resolution No. __ was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City
Council of the City of Temec-is on the day of 199_ by the following roll
call vote.
CO~CILMEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCR/~-MBERS:
COUNCH~MEMBERS:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
ORANGE:273S.I 3
ITEM 24
APPROVAl
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Council
Mary Jane McLarney, Assistant City Manager
March 28, 1995
Consideration of a Contract with DMG to Analyze Water and Sewer Impact
Fees
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council consider amending the contract with David M. Griffith and Associates
(DMG) to conduct a Water and Sewer Impact Fee Review.
BACKGROUND:
On February 28, 1995, the City Council approved a contract with DMG to perform a user fee
study and to calculate development impact fees for the City. During this meeting, the City
Council expressed an interest in reviewing water and sewer fees for reasonableness.
DMG has proposed to perform a general review of both water and sewer fees in order to
assess whether the fees have been based on reasonable assumption and methods, and that
the overall fee amounts are justified. The proposed analysis fee is not to exceed $10,000.
FISCAL IMPACT:
If the City Council wishes to proceed with this analysis, a budget transfer of ~10,000 will be
required from the General Fund Unappropriated Fund Balance to account ~q301-140-999-5248.
ATTACHMENT:
Water and Sewer Impact Fee Review
R:'~AJdn~n,4,~TAI~!3,MIS ~
dm¸q
DAVID M. GRIFFITH AND ASSOCIATES, LTD.
RECEIVED
MAR 13 1995 March 10, 1~5
Mr. Grant Yates
Human Resources Administrator
City of T emecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, Califomia 92590
.~UMm~i HE. SOURCES
RE: Water and Sewer Impact Fee Review
Dear Mr. Yates:
On February 28, 1995, the City Council approved a contract between the City and David
M. Griffith & Associates (DMG) to perform a user fee study and to calculate development
impact fees for the City. During its deliberations, the City Council expressed interest in
examining the school impact fees to determine whether they are reasonable and
appropriately calculated. DMG was asked to perform this review, and we have agree to
perform these additional services.
We recently learned that at least one Council member is also interested in reviewing the
water and sewer impact fees imposed by Rancho California Water District (RCWD) and
Eastern Municipal Water District (ElVlWD). Earlier this week, you requested that we
submit a proposal and cost estimate to perform such a review. We are pleased to offer this
assistance, and have staff who specialize in water and sewer utility rates and fees.
It is our understanding that RCWD provides most of the water and some of the sewer
services within the City, and that EMWD provides some water and most of the sewer
services. Since water and sewer services are each provided by the two separate entities,
four separate reviews are required (in fact, it may be more like two separate reviews since
the methodology and assumptions used by each District for their water and sewer fees may
be basically the same).
The analyses required for water and sewer impact fees is often more complex that other
impact fee facility types. This is caused by a variety of types of facilities and the potential
to have different methods for allocating costs to types of development. For example, water
supply and treatment costs may be based on average demand or sewer flows, while water
distribution costs consider peak demand and fire flow requirements.
We do not believe that the City is looking for a rigorous analysis of the water and sewer
impact fees, but rather a general review to assess whether the fees have been based on
reasonable assumptions and methods, and that the overall fee amounts are justifiable. If
significant problems are identified, these would be brought to the attention of the City for
their consideration and action.
California Office: 5715 Marconi Ave., Suite A · Carmichael, CA 95608 , (916) 485-8102
Mr. Grant Yates
Human Reso~ Administrator
March 10, 1995
Page 2
In performing the review of the water and sewer impact fees we propose to perform the
following tasks:
Obtain copies of each Distriet's water and sewer impact fee study
reports and other supporting documentation, including fee
schedules, resolutions, eapi_tal improvement plans, etc. (we should
note that impact fee calculations ate not always well documented).
ff necessary, meet with representatives of each District to seek
clarification or improve our understanding of their fees and
calculation methodology. Such meetings would only occur
following consultation with City staff.
Review the impact fee calculation methodology and unde~ying
assumptions for reasonableness.
Compare base assumptions for growth and development,
infrastructure requirements, and unit demands with information
from the City regarding the rate, timing, and type of new
development.
Prepare a summary report documenting our findings and
conclusions regarding each Dist~et's water and sewer impact fees.
We will meet with City staff to discuss our findings, and will be
available to present the results to the City Council as well.
We are aware that EMWD is currently in the process of updating their water and sewer
impact fees. In addition, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD) is
implementing a New Demand Charge on its member agencies (including EMWD) which
could be included in impact fees imposed by each member agency. We do not know how
EMWD might be planning to implement the New Demand Charge, but this is certainly an
issue which is being considered as part of their update. Because of these changes, the
timing may be right for the City to review the water and sewer impact fees. This could
offer an opportunity to participate in the Districts' decisions regarding changes which may
be forthcoming.
The consultant who will perform the review of the water and sewer impact fees is Bob
Reed. Bob is a Project Manager in our utility consulting practice. He is a licensed engineer
and has performed numerous utility rate and fee studies. He is also familiar with MWD's
new rates and charges, and how they might be included in water impact fees. A copy of
Bob's resume is attached to this letter for your review.
The review of water and sewer impact fees for two different Districts will be somewhat
more involved than the review of school impact fees. Nevertheless, we feel confident that
we could perform the review for a total cost not to exceed $10,000. (Aftern an initial
review of the school impact fee report, Joe Colgan believes that that review will actually be
less than the $10,000 originally estimated.) This amount would include 2 to 3 trips to
Temecula (which may be combined with other activities in the area). Bob Reed's hourly
billing rate is $110 per hour, and we would bill the City for actual time and expenses up to
the $10,000 limit. We estimate that the review of the water and sewer impact fees could be
completed within a month of receiving documentation from each of the Districts.
Mr. Grant Yates
Human Resources Administrator
March 10, 1995
Page 3
If you have any questions regarding this proposal to review the water and sewer impact
fees of RCWD and EMWD on behalf of the City, please call either Bob Reed or myself at
(916) 485-8102. We appreciate the opportunity to be of further assistance to the City.
Richard Pearl
Vice President
ROBERT U. REED, P.E.
PROJECT MANAGER
Mr. Reed is a Project Manager in our i,mpaet fee and utility consulting practice in the
West Region. He is a registered civil engineer in the State of California and has over 11
years of experience as civil engineer and as a consultant to state and local g.ovcmmcnt. lVlr.
Reed has experience in water resource management, planning, ccononuc and financial
analyses, capital facility planning, budgeting, rate and fee studies, operational and
organiT~rional studies, and litigation support.
Mr. Reed received his Bachelor of Science degree in engineering from the
University of California, Los Angeles. He also holds a Master of Science degree in Water
Resource Engineering and a Master of Business Adminislration degree in Public Policy and
Management from the University of California, Davis. He also worked as an Associate
Engineer in resources planning for a major public utility. The combination of technical and
financial experience provide Mr. Reed with a perspective well suited for understanding and
addressing the needs of governmental clients. Mr. Reed's prior experience inclu. des:
Currently assisting the City of Oceanside (populations 153,000) in the
development of new water and sewer rates and connection fees. We arc assisting
City staff in working with a sub-committee of the Utilities Commission and
appointed citizens in the conduct of this study. Mr. Reed is assiting the City in
determining how the new water rates and charges imposed by the Metropolitan
Water District (and passed-through by the San Diego County Water Authority) will
be incorporated in the City's rates and fees.
Assisted the East Bay Municipal Utility District (California) in reviewing the
legal, technical, financial, and administrative aspects of the System Capacity
Charge. This fee has been in place for 10 years and DMG is providing technical
advice on the overall SCC program. Key issues include the allocation of future
water supply costs, demand characteristics in various sub-regions of the District,
inclusion of financing costs, and accounting requirements.
Currently providing litigation support and expert witness services to one of
Northern California's largest water districts. The District provides wholesale and
retail water service to about 500,000 customers. The Disu'ict's Facilities Reserve
Charge is applicable at both the wholesale and retail levels. We are reviewing the
methodology employed by the District in developing these fees.
Currently Project Manager to the City of Del Mar to perform a comprehensive
water and sewer rate and connection fee study. Seven City Council workshops and
presentations have been conducted during this study to define policy objectives, to
review rate structure options, and to review financial policies. New conservation-
oriented rate structures have been adopted by the City. Connection fees were
developed based on a buy-in methodology since the City is largely built-out, and no
system expansion is planned.
Project Manager performing a water rate and connection fee study for the Santa
Margarita Water District. This study addressed issues associated with equity
in the water rate structures (including reclaimed water pricing) and is complicated
by the existence of eight improvement districts, each with their own capital facility
financing structures involving property assessments. Recommendations
unanimously accepted by the Board of Directors improve the conservation
incentives of the rates and improve rate equity. Presentations were made during
public hearings to explain rate recommendations.
Assisted the City of San Jose in analyzing its existing water rates and capital
improvement project financing. Development impact fees developed in this study
were designed to assist the City in complying with statutory impact fee
requirements in California (AB 1600). The project included development of
alternative approaches to formulate an impact fee system, development of cost
allocation methods for assigning capital costs to new and existing customers, a
cost-of-service analysis, recommendations on specific pricing methedologies, and
preparation of an impact fee schedule and water rate structure.
Project Manager on a follow-on engagement with the City of San Jose to assist
in the implementation of the City's Major Water ,Facilities Fees (impact fees).
During this engagement Mr. Reed assisted the City in drafting an ordinance and
resolution for the new fees, reviewed existing procedures to accept and process
applications for new water service, and reviewed the coordination between Major
Water Facilities Fees revenues and capital expenditure plans.
Consultant on a recent study for the City of San C!emente. The study included
development of new water, sewer, and reclaimed water rates and connection
(impact) fees. DMG teamed with The Keese Company and Fieldman Rolapp &
Associates on this study since the City anticipates a need to sell revenue bonds to
finance future water and sewer capital improvements.
Recently managed a water and sewer rate and impact fee study for the City d
Lathtop. This study focused on ways for the City to finance major water and
sewer system expansions to accommodate future growth, and the impacts of
obtaining an additional source of water supply. Mr. Reed is currently managing an
update of the water capital facilities fees to reflect changes in the City's Water
Master Plan.
Mr. Reed was the lead consultant for the Mayor's Blue Ribbon Committee on
Water Rates for the City of Los Angeles. During this study we worked with
the Department of Water and Power in the development of an innovative water rate
and fee structure based on marginal cost principles. The new water' rates are
intended to encourage water conservation, maintain equity between customer
classes, and assure that the Department will have sufficient revenues during future
water supply shortages. The study required a detailed analysis of DWP's capital
program budget.
Project Manager to assist the Seattle Water Department in preparing a biennial
water rate study. This project addressed issues of cost allocations between
wholesale and retail customers, cost allocation among retail customer classes, and
the rate structure for retail customers. The Water Department employs the marginal
cost of water as a basis for designing their water rates, and DMG is reviewing the
marginal cost calculations. He also assisted the Water Department in organizing
and managing a citizen rate advisory committee which participated in the rate study.
Project Manager for a comprehensive water rate study for the Marin Municipal
Water District which resulted in an innovative approach to water rates using
marginal cost pricing. The engagement also included a district management audit.
Mr. Reed performed a review of Engineering functions, including water supply and
capital facilities planning and cost sharing between new and existing development.
Project Manager on a study to assist the City of Atlanta, Georgia to develop an
impact fee accounting system. The system will track impact fees for transportation,
parks and recreation, police, and fire/EMS facilities. Future expansion of the
system will allow it to also track impact fees for water, sewer, and storm water
facilities.
Assisted in the development of an impact fee program for Cherokee County,
Georgia, Impact fees were calculated for fire/EMS, parks and recreation, libraries,
jail facilities, and roads. Involved in a water and sewer impact fee study for the
Cherokee County Water & Sewerage Authority in Georgia in compliance
with that state's new impact fee legislation.
Assisted the City of Scotts Valley in updating and revising its wastewater rates
and rate structure. Mr. Reed is currently assisting the City of Gait in a water and
sewer rate study. He also performed a review of the costs and revenues of the
City of Caiistoga's water and sewer rates and capital facility charges, and made
recommendations for changes.
Mr. Reed was formerly a utility consulting manager with Ernst & Young. He has
also conducted economic research on water conservation, pricing policies, water rationing,
drought management, and water supply pining. His research focused on economic
efficiency and equity in the distribution of limited water resources within urban water
districts. Research culminated in masters thesis.
ITEM 25
ITEM 26
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
ApI~OVAI '
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
March 28, 1995
Overland Drive Overcrossing - Status Report
RECOMMENDATION:
The City Council review this status report, discuss and provide direction to staff as
appropriate.
BACKGROUND:
The purpose of this report is to update the City Council on the progress of subject project.
Following is the status of various activities:
A. Engineering Design and Specifications
1. Project Study Report Completed Approved
2. Project Report Completed Approved
3. Plans for Street Improvements Completed Submitted for Review
4. Plans for Structure Completed Submitted for Review
5. Specifications Completed Submitted for Review
It should be noted that Caltrans Structures Division requested additional soil borings to verify
the adequacy of design based on the originally submitted borings.
Engineering Cost (total per contract)
Engineering Cost to Date
Balance per Contract
$ 761,000
744,000
$ 17,000
Southern California Edison (SCE) - Facility Relocation
In conjunction with this project proposal, relocation of SCE facilities will be required.
There are three (3) SCE lines crossing I-15 in the vicinity of the Overland Drive
Overcrossing. These include, 12 KVA, 33 KVA and 115 KVA. Provisions have been
made for placing the 12 and 33 KVA in the conduit in the bridge structure.
-1- ~ltl~t~95~2g~.4-,,~ up~/ajp
The 115 KVA requires overhead relocations. The exact location of the re-rOuting of the
115 KVA has not been determined. However, general routing has been proposed and
appears acceptable to all concerned.
The SCE issues include the following:
e
Will the Environmental Assessment completed by the City, which addressed all
the utilities, be adequate for PUC to authorize the relocation to proceed·
The exact location and the right-of-way costs associated with this project.
Deign costs for the relocation.
Construction costs for relocating the facility.
A very preliminary costs estimate for the relocation is as follows:
2.
3.
4.
Preliminary Design
Right-of-Way Costs
Final Design
Construction
Preliminary Cost Estimate
Contingency + 20%
Estimated Cost
20,000
60,000
60,000
500.000
640,000
128.000
768,000
It should also be recognized that, based on discussion with' SCE, that pole delivery is
estimated to take 18 months from the date of order.
Other Right-Of-Way
The City has obtained the right-of-way from Coop on the southerly side of the
proposed structure· The northerly portion of right-of-way required is owned by Mrs.
Hill. Our City Attorney has been negotiating with Mrs. Hill's representatives, and
advised that the required right-of-way could be obtained from the property owner for
less than $200,000. Negotiations are continuing.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
ITEM 27
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
March 28, 1995
Street Maintenance and/or Construction of Unpaved Streets
RECOMMENDATION:
That City Council review the alternatives presented and provide direction to staff.
BACKGROUND:
City Council at their meeting of March 14, 1995 directed staff to prepare a report addressing
the issue of maintenance of unpaved streets.
There is approximately 3.31 miles of unpaved streets. The listing of these streets and the
appropriate mileage for each is listed in the attached Exhibit "A".
By previous action, City Council authorized grading of certain streets after heavy rains to
provide access to property. The streets included in that action were: Santiago Road (0.36
miles), John Warner Road (0.46 miles), Liefer Road (0.86 miles) and Walcott Lane (0.53
miles). The total length of these four (4) streets is approximately 2.21 miles. The remaining
unpaved streets on Exhibit "A" is approximately 2.1 miles.
From our past experience, the work that has been performed on the streets, the cost of
grading the 2.21 miles of the four (4) streets is approximately $1 ,200 after each rain. Based
on that experience it would be fair to estimate the additional cost of $1,200 for grading the
remaining unpaved streets.
During the storms since January of this year, the authorized streetsfor grading as stated above
were re-graded seven (7) times at a cost of $1,200 each time, for a total cost of $8,400. For
that same period the additional cost for clearing and grading the balance of the unpaved
roadway would be an additional $1,200 per grading or $8,400 ($16,800 total of both).
The alternative would be to pave a minimum of two (2) lanes, each twelve (12) feet wide to
the City standard. The estimated cost for the paving, base material, drainage structures and
incidental work is approximately $1.75 million for construction with an additional costs for
contingencies and incidentals in the amount of $0.75 million for a total cost of $2.5 million.
-1- r:.~hlst~eS~32S~joesmia.zpUs)
The financing mechen'mm eveliable to the property owners for such improvements are:
1. Pay cash for the improvements prior to award of contract.
2, Assessment District - with 1913 Act proceedings and 1915 Bond Act financing.
Recently, these alternatives were explored by the residents along Liefer Road. Staff met with
the property owners, explained the proceedings for Assessment District. Subsequently staff
corresponded with all the owners, requesting that they sign a petition to form the Assessment
District.
The response was quite unfavorable. Of the 57 owners, only 12 responded. Of the 12
respondere eight (8) were in favor and four (4) against the formation of an Assessment
District. No response indicates that there was no interest in forming the Assessment District. '.
Property owners representing less than 20% of the area responded. Of those responding,
12% was in favor and 8% was against the Assessment District formation.
For FY 1994-95,the City Council decided not to fund permanent road improvements through
Service Level R because of the potential that CSD law could be revised to allow a majority
protest provision within the law. This would mean that potentially, if property owners within
Service Level R were able to muster a majority protest, the rate and charge for that particular
year could be disapproved, end the City Council would have no recourse to recoup the
construction costs, which were proposed to be funded from the City's General Fund Reserve.
Therefore, the City Council directed staff to assist any property owners who desired in the
formation of an Assessment District to fund necessary road improvements. As a result,
property owners adjacent to Liefer Road submitted a request to the City to assist in the
formation of an Assessment District to construct street and drainage improvements to Liefer
Road.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Undetermined, depending on City Council direction and the future weather conditions annually.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Exhibit "A"
LOL1TA ROAD
ORMSBY ROAD (dirt)
SANTIAGO ROAD
JOHN WARNER ROAD
LIE ROAD
GATLIN ROAD
~OOD LANE
PALA VISTA DRIVE
CALLE CHAPOS
CALLE SARAGOZA
CAN~ ROAD
WALCOTT LANE
CALLE GIRASOL
LOCATION
APPROXIMATE TOTAL MILES
MILES
.118
.065
.360
.460
.856
.065
.175
.354
.710
.090
.016
.530
.400
4,20 MILES
-3- r:~agdrptX95X0328Xjo~nmim.tpl/ajp
ITEM 28
APPRcIVAI
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFI
CrTY MANAG
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Manager/City Council
Mary Jane McLarnay, Assistant City Manager
March 28, 1995
Community Services Funding Program
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council consider the recommendations for the Community Services Funding
Grants for FY 1994/95.
BACKGROUND:
At the request of the City Council, Mayor Jeff Stone and Mayor Pro Tam Lindemans met with
Shawn Nelson and Mary Jane McLarney to review the applications for Assistance League of
Tamecula Valley and the Riverside County Child Care Consortium. The Committee is
recommending the Assistance League be granted the ~ 1,000 requested amount for equipment
for the Speaker's Bureau to promote Operation School Bell, Project Smile and Kids On The
Block. The Committee is not recommending assistance for the Riverside County Child Care
Consortium for a Child Care Directory.
FISCAL IMPACT:
A total of $22,500 is available for this program.
ATTACHMENT: CSD Funding Requests as of 3128/95
o
ITEM 29
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL R~
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFIC
CITY MANAGE
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
Mary Jane McLarnay, Assistant City Manager
March 28, 1995
Third Amendment to the Fire Protection Agreement for Fiscal Year 1994/95 '-
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council approve the Third Amendment of the Cooperative Agreement to Provide
Fire Protection, Fire Prevention, Rescue and Medical Aid for the City of Temecula.
BACKGROUND:
Pursuant to the City Council's decision to staff an interim fire station, it was necessary to
prepare the attached amendment to our contract with Riverside County for fire services. This
amendment includes the increased fire protection personnel service costs and station operation
costs for the Eastside Fire Station #84.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Adequate funds are budgeted for FY 1994-95 for the increased level of fire service.
1
8
16
~0
COOPERATIVE ~GREEMENT TO PROVIDE FIRE PROTECTION,
FIRE PREVENTION, RESCUE AND MEDICAL AID
FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA
THIS THIRD ~w~N~WNT is made and entered into by the
City of Temecula and the County of Riverside.
RECITALS'.
Ww~pm~m, The parties heretofore entered into an agreement
entitled "A COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT TO PROVIDE FIRE PROTECTION,
FIRE PREVENTION, RESCUE AND MEDICALAID FOR CITY OF TEMECULA-
(the **AGREEMENT-) dated July 1, 1994~ and
W~x~m~., the parties are requesting an amendment to said
agreement attachment Exhibit "A"~ and
WHERFa2, the purpose of this amendment is to include the
increased fire protection personal service costs for the E~stside
Fire Station (Station #84).
COVENANTS
NOW, THEREFOPa, in consideration of the mutual promises
and agreements herein contained, the parties agree as follows:
1. aMeNDMeNT. The parties agree that Exhibit "A" of the
Agreement is hereby amended to provide as follows:
The attached Exhibit "A" shall be in place for the Fiscal
Year 1994/95.
2. EFFECTIV~ DATE. This Third Amendment shall become
effective upon execution by all of the above-mentioned parties.
///
1
4
7
8
10
11
14
17
18
19
SO
Z4
~5
~6
Z7
IMWITMESS WB~PaOF, the City has caused this agreement to
be signed by its Mayor and sealed by its Clerk and the County
of Riverside by order of its Board of Supervisors, made
, has caused this agreement to be subscribed by
the Chairman of said Board and sealed and attested by the Clerk
of the Board, all on the day and year first above written.
DATED:
CITY OF TEMECULA
ATTEST:
BY:
MAYOR
BY:
TITLE:
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
BY:
CHAIRMAN, BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
ATTEST:
BY:
GERALD MALONEY
CLERK OF THE BOARD
EXHIBIT A
TEMECULA FIRE SERVICES
FY 1994/95
PERSONNEL AND
SERVICE DELIVERY COSTS
Amended for Station 84
PR~-~OM~.
C]-~S~f~CAt~On Po~t~ons
Battalion Chief 1.0
Fire Safety Specialist 1.0
Fire System Inspeotor 1.0
Fire Captain 3.0
Fire Apparatus Engineers 5.0
Firefighter II 16.0
Salaries, Benefits, State
Administrative Charge:
$1,747,630
Total Uniform Allowance
$ 20,734'
*50% Aerial Truck Staffing
Fire Captain 1.5
Fire Apparatus Engineer 1.5
Firefighter II 3.0
Total Positions 24.6
Total $1,768,364
SR~V~C~ DR~.TV~y/D~~ .~PPOR~ ,qR~Vrt'~q
Station 12
Station 73
Station 84
Total
$199,209
$211,823
$ 53,000
$463,032
Total cost for Personnel and Service Delivery
*Less estimated structural fire and
redevelopment tax credit
NET CITY BILLING
$2,232,396
$1,475,996
$ 756,400
exh.S.b~ta.
ITEM 30
APPROVAl
N
CITY ATTOR EY
RNANCE OFFIC
CITY.MA AG
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Council
Ronald E. Bradley, City Manager
March 28, 1995
City Council Meeting Start Time
RECOMMENDATION:
Read by title only and introduce an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 95-,_
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING CHAP'!'Bt 2;04 OF THE TEMECULA
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO THE TIME AND PLACE OF
CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS
BACKGROUND:
On March 14, 1995, the City Council directed staff to prepare the necessary changes in order
to allow City Council meetings to begin at 6:30 p.m. instead of the traditional 7:00 p.m. start
time.
This change is requested to allow for public comments during the first 30 minutes of the
Council Meeting. The dates for City Council meetings will remain on the second and fourth
Tuesday of each month.
RSCAL IMPACT:
None.
ATTACHMENTS:
Ordinance 95---
R:~AI~DA~'rAFFIS~41~ ~
ORDINANCE NO. 9S- ~"
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CI'~ OF
TIIVIECULA AMENDING C~AFI'ER 2.114 OF THE TEMICULA
MUNICIPAL CODE ltEt-&TING TO THE TIME AND PLACE OF CITY
COUNCIL
--- THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMF_,CULA DOES I:fP~k'~Y ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1.
follows:
2.04 of the Temecula M,,nicipsl Code is hereby amended to read as
"9..04,020 - Time ,rid plsce of meetings.
A. Regular meetings for the City Council shall be held on the second and fourth
Tuesday of each month. Regular me~ings shall commence at 5:00 p.m. for Closed Sessions
and 6:30 p.m. for Open Sessions and adjourn at 10:00 p.m., subject to an adopted motion to
extend the meeting. Regular meetings sbsll be conducted at the Community Recreation Centmr
(CRC), 30875 Rancho Vista Pond.
B. The City Cotmcil may, be resolution, designate another date, time and location
for a meeting."
Section 2. ~.ffeetive F~te. This Ordinance shah be in full force and effect thirty
(30) days after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. The
City Clerk shaft publish a summary of this Ordinance and a certified copy of the full text of this
Ordinance shah be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five days prior to the adoption
of this Ordinance. Within 15 days from adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall publish
a summary of this Ordinance, together with the names of the Councilmembers voting for and
against the Ordinance, and post the same in the office of the City Clerk.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 28th day of March, 1995.
ATTEST:
leffrey E. Stone, Mayor
lune S. Greek, City Clerk
ords~95-~7 I
STATE OF C~T,wORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) SS.
CITY OFT~!ECULA )
I, JUNE S. Gl~l~rm"3~, City C, lerk of tJae City of Temectda, C~ifonda, do hex~by cert~
that the foregoing Orclinnnce No. 95-_. was duly introduced and phced upon its first _r~din~
at a regular meeting of the City Council on the day of ,1995, and that thereafter, said
Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Temecula on the day of , 1995 by the following roll call vote:
AYP, S:
NOF, S:
ABSENT:
COUNCII,MIIV~ItlS:
COUNCnMBMBI~RS:
COUNCK,MlJV~I~RS:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
ords~67 2
ITEM 3 1
DEPARTMENTAL
REPORTS
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Anthony Elmo, Chief Building Official//~,/
March 28, 1995
Building and Safety February 1995, Activity Report
RECOMMENDATION:
Receive and file.
DISCUSSION:
The following is a summary of activity for February 1995:
Building Permits Issued ............................................. 170
Building Valuation .......................................... ~9,127,312
Revenue Collected ............................................ ~61,544.
Housing Starts .................................................... 89
Building Inspections ............................................. 2,175
Commercial Additions/Alterations .............................. 4 - ,82 Sq. ft.
New Commercial Starts .................................. I - 15,450 Sq. ft.
V:~,TON'i%qEPORTS~ErIS,RPT 312/9~ tie
Agenda Report
March 28, 1995
Page 2
Code Enforcement Actions .......................................... 780
Active Cases Pending .............................................. 114
Closed Cases ................................................... 56
V:%TQNY~EPOITTSV~i'IS.IFr 3/2~6 td.
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER )~
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
Gary Thornhill, Dire~:ter of Planning,~=~''
March 28, 1995
Monthly Report .
RECOMMENDATION:
Receive end File
Discussion:
The following is a summary of the Planning Department's
caseload and project activity for the month of January 1995:
Caseload Activity:
The Department received 4 applications for administrative cases and 3 applications for public
hearing cases for the month of January follows:
Minor Conditional Use PM
Parcel Map-Res No Waiver
Public Use Permit
TOTAL 3
Ongoing Projects:
Old Town Streetscape Improvement Project: The scope of the contract with EPT is
being finalized. Council approval is expected in March.
Old Town RedeveloDment Project: Staff continues to meet with Zev Buffman and Gene
Hancock on project financing. Staff is working with the consultant to finalize the
responses to comments.
Develooment Code: The Planning Commission began the public hearing process on
March 20th subsequent meetings to review the code are April 3rd, May 15th, and June
19, 1995. A joint Banning Commission/City Council workshop to formally introduce
a public hearing draft of the development code is being scheduled. A draft zoning map
will also be presented at the workshop. The public hearing process before the Planning
Commission is scheduled to start on March 20, 1995, A public hearing Draft Code will
be available March 10, 1995.
R:t31)NTHLY.RPT~I99~AN 3/21/95 vlw 1
French Valley Airoort: The Riverside County Aviation Commission met on January 19,
1995, end recommended approval to the County Board of Supervisors for the Final
Environmental Impact Report, Facility Master Plan for the French Valley Airport. The
Airport Land Use Commission has postponed consideration of the Comprehensive Land
Use Plan until May 1995.
Nicolas Valley Soecial Study: Staff presented the land use recommendations to the
Planning Commission at the March 6, 1995 hearing. The item was continued to the
April 6, 1995 Planning Commission meeting.
Winchester Hills This Specific Plan and Environmental Impact Report have been placed
on hold by the applicant.
Murdv Ranch Soecific Plan and Environmental Impact RepOrt: The applicant has
requested additional time in order to make minor changes to the Specific Plan and file.
for a Development Agreement application. After the Development Agreement is'
submitted and reviewed by staff, this item will be scheduled for Planning Commission
and City Council hearings.
Johnson Ranch Soecific Plan: The Planning Commission held a public workshop on
March 13, 1995. T. hey directed the applicant to increase the open space buffer,
increase lot sizes and reduce the number of units. The next Planning Commission
hearing is April 17, 1995. :
Rorioauah Ranch Soecific Plan: A revised land use plan has been submitted which will
be reviewed by staff. The Notice of Preparation will be mailed to appropriate agencies
for the EIR which will start the EIR process.
Attachment:
1. Revenue and Status Report - Page 4
i:~dGNTHLY.RPT~I99~IAN 3~21~9~ vgw 2
.ATTACHMENT NO. 1
REVENUE STATUS REPORT
REVPRIN2
03/02/95
O01
161
ACCOUNT #
4101
4102
4103
410~
4105
4106
4107
4100
410~
4110
4112
4113
4114
4115
4117
4118
4120
4121
4122
4124
4127
4128
4129
4130
4131
4132
4133
4134
4135
4136
4137
4138
4,140
4141
4142
414~
4144
4,145
4146
00:56:2~
GENERAL FUND
PLANNING
DESCRIPTION
HNDED FINAL NAP
APPEALS
CERT. OF LAND DIV. COMPLIANCE
EXTENSION OF TIRE
SINGLE FAHILY TRACTS
iIJI. TI-FAHILY TRACTS
PARCEL NAPS
LOT LiNE ADJUSTMENT
MIldOR CHANGE
PARCEL MERGER (2-4, LOTS)
RECORDABLE ~BDIVISICXi 'NAPS
REVERSION TO ACREAGE (5+LOTS)
SPECIAL SERVICE LETTER
SECOND UNIT PERNITS
CHANGE OF ZONE
CONDITIONAL USE PERHIT
CONSISTENCY CHECKS
GENERAL PLAN AHENDHENT
PLOT PLAN
PUBLIC USE PERNIT
REVISED PERHIT
SETBACK ADJUSTRENT
SPECiFiC PLAN
SUBSTANTTAL CONFONHANCE
TEHORARY OUTDOOR EVENT
TEHPORARY USE PERHIT
VARIANCE
ZONING INFORNATION LETTER
CEQA (INITIAL STUDIES) _-
CEQA ENVIRCMENT IHPACT REPORT
DEVELOPMENT AGREEHENT
GEOLOGY CEQA
GEOLOGY ORD. 54,7 APZ
LAFCO
PARCEL MAP/k~AiVER
HERGiN
AMENDED FINAL TRACT/PAR. MAP
CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTIN
COIlDO TRACT MAP
REVERSION TO ACREAGE
LOT REVISIUN AFTER CHECK
LOT LINE ADJUST. PLAId CHECK
CERT. OF CORRECT. PLAN CHECK
CERT. OF COIPLIANCE PLAN CNECK
CIXD. CENT. OF CtX4PL. PLN.
CERT. OF PAR. MERGER PLAN CK
CITY OF TEI4ECULA
REVENUE STATUS REPORT
FEBRUARY 1995
ADJUSTED
ESTINATE
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.O0
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
180,000.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.IX)
.OG
.00
.00
FEBRI,~Y
REVEIE
.00
325 .OO
.00
*307.00
.00
.00
1,683. OO
.00
.00
.00
.OO
.OO
.OO
.OO
.O0
5~0.00
.00
.00
3,981 .oo
3,707.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
50.00
.00
.00
.00
568. O0
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
199~-95
RillLIE
.O0
65Q.00
200.00
9,T'~1.8~
.00
11.230.00
2~0.00
1,4,10.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
5,492.00
8,810.00
.00
.00
6,153.00
4,887.00
4,,130.00
250.00
4,9,960.30
5,731.00
1,09Q.O0
.O0
.OO
.00
2,4,4,5.90
2,629.00
4,000.00
.O0
.00
.00
.OO
500.00
.00
.O0
.00
392 .O0
.O0
.00
.00
.00
.00
.OO
PAg~ 1
BALANCE XCOL
.00
650.00:. ***
200.00-
1.953.00- ***
9,731.89- ***
.00
11.230.00-
230.00- *'*'*
1,4,1O.QO-
.OO
.DO
.00
5,492.00-
8,810.00- ***
.00
.00
173,867.00
6,130.00- ***
250.Q0. ~
5,731 .GO- - ***
1,090.00.
.00
.00
.00
2,445.90-
2,629.00-
4,000.00-
.00
.OO
.00
.00
500.00- **w
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
REVP~IN2
161
ACCOU!iT #
4147
41~
6149
6150
4151
4152
4153
4154
4155
4156
4157
4170
4175
4180
4200
4206
4226
4260
4261
08:56:25
PLANNING
DESCRIPTION
VACATIONS PLAN CK
DOCUI4ENT PROCESSING
CONDEMNATION.PLAN CHECK
REVERSION TO ACRE. PLAN CHECK
PARCEL MAP PLAN CHECK
TRACT NAP PLAN CHEClC
Hi)B) HAP PLAN CHECK:
4TH & SUBS. SUBMITTAlS
FENA STUDY REVIEU
LOHA REViEt~
DRAINACE S'rLR)Y REVIEU
IMPROVE iNSPECTiON ON-SITE
K-RAT STUDY FEES
FAST TRACK PLANNING
FORHA FAST TRACK
IN HOUSE PLAN CHECKS
ANNEXATiON FEES
TEHPOP, ARY USE PERHIT
ACCESSORY t,/IND ENERGY
LARGE FAHILY DAY CARE
HAZARDOUS UASTE FACiLiTY
LARD DIV UNIT HAP
LANDSCAPE PLAN CHECK
PLANNING
C'iTY OF TENECULA
REVEiFJE STATUS REPORT
FEBRUARY 1~5
ADJUSTED
ESTINATE
.00
.00
.00
.00
,00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
180,000.00
FEBRIMRY
REVENIE
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
/30.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
4,205.00
15,946.00
199~-95
REVE~
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
6,600.00
710.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
187.00
33,6)0.00
16),002.09
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
,00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
6,600.00-
710.00-
.00
.00
.00
.187.00-
16,997.91
PAGE 2
COL
REPT151 FEES COLLECTED BY ItEC~EIPT PAGE 1
03/02/95 09:16 Stmmmry by Acco.~ Code FEB 95 REV
POST DATE RANGE: 02/01/95 Thru 02/28/95
1021 001-161-4102 PLNG-APPEALS 325.00
Total for Accost .......................... 325.00
lOzd 001-161-&10~ PLNG-EXTENSION OF TIlE 307.00
Total for Account .......................... :307.00
1071 001-161 -~,107 PLNG-PARCEL NAPS 1,4~.00
Total for Account .......................... .1,4~.00
1161 001-161-4116 PLNG-CONDITIONAL USE
TotaL for Accotmt ..........................
1191 001'161-4119 PLNG'PLOT PLAN :~,981.00
Total for Account .......................... ),981.00
1201 001'161'4120 PLIIG'PUBLIC USE PERHZT 3,707.00
Total for Account .......................... 3,707.00
1251 001-161-4125 PLNG-TBqP OUTDOOR EVEeT 50.00
Total for Account ..........................
50.00
12~1 001-161-4129 PLNG-CEQA (INIT STUDIES) 5~8.00
Total for Account .......................... 568,00
1990 001-161-4200 PLNG-PLAN CK (IN HOUSE) 7)0.00
Total for Account .......................... 730.00
3706
001'161'4370 PLN'LANDSCAPE PLAN CHECK ' 4,205.00
Total for Account ..........................
4,205.00
APPROVAL
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
March 28, 1995
Public Works Monthly Activity Report'
RECOMMENDATION:
Attached for City Council's review and filing is the Department of Public Works' Monthly
Activity Reports for February, 1995.
r:%a~drpt~noa~upUajp
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Monthly Activity Report
MARCH, Submitted by: Joseph Kicak
Prepared by: Don Spagnolo
Date: March 17, 1995
!. WORK UNDER CONSTRUCTION:
1. Pale Communiw P-rk:
Construction began on August 15, 1994, and is approximately 75% complete.
Construction is expected to be completed by the middle of March, 1995 and the
maintenance period is expected to be completed by the end of June, 1995. The
hardscape, building, and utility substructure are about 95% complete. The majority '.
of the work remaining consists of landscaping the park and installing the site amenities
such as a wooden trellis, barbecues, benches and fencing. The project consists of the
construction of a lighted soccer field, tennis courts, basketball courts,
restroom/concession stand, play areas and parking.
2. Sports Park Slooe Reoair:
Construction began at the end of April, 1994. The construction of the project has
been completed and the 90-day maintenance period began October 3, 1994. The
maintenance period has been extended until the landscape contractor has completed
the punch list items generated during the maintenance period. The project is expected
to be accepted by the end of February, 1995. The project consisted of the
reconstruction of the slope below Margarita Road, the installation of an irrigation
system and landscaping on the reconstructed. slope, and the reconstruction of a
portion of the earthen channel meandering through the park.
3. Loma Linda Park - Ih
The project has been completed and a recommendation to accept the project and file
the notice of completion will be made to the Board of Directors when the contractor
has submitted the final release and maintenance bond. The project consisted 'of
grading and the installation of irrigation, landscaping, play equipment and other
amenities.
4. Traffic Signal at Winchester Rd. |HWY. 79N) & Nicolas Rd.:
Southern California Edison is expected to complete their portion of the electrical by
March 21, 1995. The contractor will then be able to complete the project by installing
the traffic signal poles, controller cabinet and stripe the intersection. The project is
expected to be completed by the end of March.
pwO4Vnoa~--trpt%cip%gSVner 03116fa6
//~'.-
Monthly Activity Report
March 17, 1995
Page 2
5. Kent Hlnteroardt Memorial Park:
Construction began August 22, 1994 and is complete. The contractor is addressing
the punch list items generated during the final walk through and the project is
expected to be completed by the end Of February, 1995. The project consists of the
construction of a 950 square foot concession stand and rest room facility with a 225
square foot porch.
6. Traffic Signal & Vehicle Pro-Emotion Installation:
The contractor has completed the pre-emption installation at the four signalized
intersections and will complete the nine vehicle emergency pre-emption equipment by
March 22, 1995.
7. Pala Road/Route 79S Interim Improvements:
Caltrans is expected to overlay Highway 79 South on March 21st and the city's
contractor will have his work completed by March 28th.
8. Winchester Road Interim Ramn Improvements:
The contractor has completed the retaining wall on the south side of Winchester Road
and is now preforming his grading operation. The project will be completed within 3
months. The project will consist of widening both the south and north sides of
Winchester Road between Jefferson Avenue and the I-15 south bound ramps. The
existing traffic signals at Jefferson Avenue and the south bound ramps will be
modified along with the landscaping and irrigation.
9. Traffic Signal at Margarita Rd. & Avonida Barca:
The contractor has installed the traffic signal foundations, most of the electrical
conduits and pull boxes. Once the poles are approved by Caltrans and Southern
California Edison completes their portion of the electrical work the contractor will
complete the project by installing the traffic signal poles, controller cabinet and stripe
the intersection. This project is Federally funded and consists of the installation of
a fully actuated traffic signal, signing and striping at the intersection of Margarita Rd.
and Avenida Barca.
10. Moraga Rd. Street Widening:
On March 15, 1995 the City Council awarded the project to Ronald L. Harris. A pro-
construction meeting will take place by the end of March. This project includes the
widening and restriping of Moraga Road between Margarita Road and Rancho
California Road, extending the two double box culverts, an outlet structure, channel
grading and landscaping.
pwO4~n~eetrpt~=ip~gS%mer 03/16/96
Monthly Activity Report
March 17, 1995
Page 3
II. WORK IN DESIGN
1. I-15/Winchester Roxd Interchange Modifications:
-The Project Report was approved by CaltranS on January 25, 1995. Plans and
specifications were sent To Caitrans for review and returned to the consultant on
February 8, 1995. The plans and specifications will be resubmitted to Caltrans on
February 24, 1995. The City has obtained the services of Riverside County to help
in the acquisition of right-of-way. The project is on schedule for bid advertisement by
May 1, 1995.
2. Walcott Corridor: '
The consultant is presently revising the plans and expects to return the third plan
check by the end of March. The project will provide for two (2) travel lanes (total of
32' of pavement width) within the 66' wide dedicated right-of-way. The alinement
will follow the existing right-of-way and accommodate a 30-mph design speed. The
total length of the project is approximately 8,500 feet. This project will also include
the relocation of Rancho California Water District's existing water main.
3. SDorts Park Parkina and Skate Board Park:
The final plan check comments have been returned to the engineer and the plans and
specifications are expected to be ready for the solicitation of bids by the end of
February, 1995. The improvements include grading, installation of irrigation,
landscaping, roller hockey rink, skateboard park, sidewalk, rest room facility and
parking lot.
4. Sam Hicks Monument Park Improvement Project:
The final plan check comments have been returned to the architect and the plans and
specifications are expected to be ready for the solicitation of bids by the middle of
March, 1995. The improvements include the construction of a 950 square foot
concession stand and rest room facility, an asphalt parking lot, landscaping and
irrigation improvements, and assorted park site amenities. The construction activities
are to be coordinated with the construction of the museum and church renovation
projects.
5. Rancho Vista Road and Mira Loma Drive Sidewalk Improvements:
This project is funded from Senate Bill 821 funds for Fiscal Year 1994-95. The project
consists of the installation of approximately 14,600 square feet of sidewalk on the
northerly side of Rancho Vista Rd. between Mira 'Loma Dr. and Santa Suzanne Dr., the
easterly side of Mira Loma Drive between Rancho Vista Rd. and Santa Cecilia Dr., and
pwO4%moectrpt~:ip~95~ner 03/16/95
Monthly Activity Report
Matth 17, 1995
Page 4
the southerly side of Rancho Vista Rd. east of Avenida de la Reina. This project is in
the early stages of design and is expected to be out to bid by May, 1995.
6. Solana Way Storm Drain Improvements - RFP No. :~6:
Albert A. Webb Associates has been selected to provide design engineering services
for the Solana Way storm drain improvements (Ynez Road to Acacia Park Resort
Apartments). The improvements to be constructed include, but not limited to grading,
main line storm drain, utility relocations, misc. structures, erosion control, and traffic
control.
7. I-151Rancho California Road Interchange Modifications:
The project plans and specifications are approximately 60% complete and will be
resubmitted to Caltrans after the consultant completes the plans for the northbound
off-ramp using the option which includes a 2:1 slope design and the 'purchase of
additional right-of-way.
8. I-151Overland Drive Overcrossing Imorovements:
The Project Report and Project Study Report have been reviewed and approved by
Caltrans. The plans and specifications were submitted to Caltrans for final review on
Friday, January 13, 1995 and comments have not been returned to the consultant.
The structural plans have been submitted to Caltrans (Division of Structures) on
Friday, January 6, 1995 for review and comments have been sent to J.F. Davidson's
structural engineer for incorporation into the plans. The consultant is preparing the
legal plats and descriptions of the properties that need to be acquired.
9. Temecula Middle School Lighting Project:
A professional services contract was awarded to Dream Engineering, Inc. to prepare
the plans and technical specifications for the sports field lighting at the Temecula
Middle School. The engineer is expected to submit the plans and specifications to the
City for first plan check comments by the middle of March, 1995. The Plans and
Specifications are expected to be ready for the solicitation of bids by June, 1995.
10. Emerqency Generator:
A professional services contract was awarded to RWR Pascoe to prepare the plans
and technical specifications for the emergency generator to be constructed at the
Community Recreation Center. The engineer is expected to submit the plans and
specifications to the City for first plan check comments by the middle of March, 1995.
The Plans and Specifications are expected to be ready for the solicitations of bids by
June, 1995.
pwO4~noactrpt~ip~gb'~nar 03/16/95
Monthly Actfvity Report
March 17, 1995
Page 5
11. Interim Fire Station - Fast of I15
A construction contract has been awarded to Nelson Paving and Grading.
Construction is expected to begin by the end of February, 1995 and be completed by
the middle of March, 1995. The project consists of grading and the construction of
an asphalt driveway and a concrete slab for the fire truck and company trailers.
pwO4Vnoactmt%dp~b"~mar 0311e/95
LAND DEVELOPMENT
Monthly Activity Report
Special Projects
January, 1'995
Submitted by: Joseph Kicak~
Prepared by: Raymond A. Casey
Date: February 10, 1995
FFMA/OFS RFIMBURSFMFNT:
Staff is continuing to coordinate with the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the
State Office of Emergency Services (OES) representatives in seeking reimbursement for costs
incurred by the City due to the January 1993 floods and ensuing disaster declaration. OES has
reimbursed the City a total of ~952,832 to date. The Murrieta Creek Damage Survey Report was
determined to be a valid claim bringing the total cumulative reimbursable amount to $1,080;996.
Staff has also been coordinating with FEMA and OES in seeking reimbursement for costs incurred
by the City due to the recent floods of January - March 1995.
PARKVIEW SITE (PROJECT NO. PW93-09):
The Final Rough Grading Plan and specifications are being finalized by the consultants along with-
the Pauba Road Improvement Plans and the Construction Specifications. Rough Grad~---
construction is anticipated to begin in April '1995 and be completed in May 1995.
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 159 (AD 159):
The AD 159 improvements, as listed, are at the following stages of construction:
Temecula Creek is approximately 99% complete.
The Butterfield Stage Road, and DePortola Road improvements are complete and the roads
are ready for City acceptance.
Highway 79 South plans have been submitted to Caltrans (third plan check) and RCFCD
(second plan check).
Pala Road's Request For Proposal for environmental consulting has been approved by
Caltrans and distributed. Phase I construction (from Butterfield Stage Road to Avenida de
Missions) is scheduled to begin this summer.
ASSESSMFNT DISTRICT 1 61 (AD 161 ):
Winchester Road (Area II) - estimated completion date is January 1996
The Notice to Proceed was issued for Murrieta Hot Springs Road (West) and the estime
completion date is mid June 1995.
rYmoeeq~/aev/~S/Nbmar~
CAll F'PINA Cnl Aria BYPASS (PROJFCT NO.94-16):
study has been forwarded to Metropolitan Water District (MWD) for their review. Staff has
/'~ived comments from MWD and has scheduled a meeting to discuss them.
OI D TOWN RFDFVFI OPMFNT PROJFCT:
The following Requests for Proposals (RFP) are associated with the contemplated improvements in
conjunction with the Old Town Entertainment_Project. The RFPs have either been distributed,
undergoing review, or the Consultant has been selected.
The parking study and the required infrastructure improvements' associated with the Old Town
Redevelopment Project were presented to the Old Town Advisory Committee.
RFP#27 - Phase I WeStern Bypass Corridor. On January 6, 1995, a revised RFP and Scope
of Project was mailed to the five engineering firms that had initially submitted proposals.
Phase I was expanded to potentially include the intersection improvements to Western
-Bypass Corridor at Rancho California Road. The consultants resubmitted their revised
proposals and the consulting contract is being recommended to the RDA at tonight's
meeting.
RFP#28 - First Street Extension, This. project includes the improvements for the extension
of First Street from the intersection of First Street/Front Street/Santiago Road overcrossing
Murrieta Creek to the Western Bypass Corridor· Norris-Repke, Inc. was selected to provide
professional engineering services, Norris-Repke, Inc, is scheduled to provide Staff with a
complete set of plans and specifications by October 1995.
RFP#30 - Old Town Parking Study. This parking/circulation study is evaluating parking
facility alternatives and alternative modes of local transportation to provide adequate access
for tourists and shoppers in and around Old Town. Robert Kahn, John Kain & Associates,
Inc. (RKJK) has completed the Parking Study and staff recently approved it.
RFP#32 - Western Bypass Corridor Assessment District. The project comprises all
engineering services related to the formation of an Assessment District for the design and
construction of the Western Bypass Corridor, from Vincent Moraga Drive/Rancho California
Road to Highway 79(S), including the bridge crossing over Murrieta Creek (Phase I), and
Vincent Moraga DrivelRancho California Road to Cherry Street (Phase II). The scope may
be revised to be consistent with the extent of improvements as indicated in RFP#27. The
selection process is virtually complete and upon completion, the selected consultant will be
presented before the City Council.
To date, we have met with Rancho California Water District and Eastern Municipal Water District
and all draft, conceptual, and tentative development plans and information have been forwarded.
We have also met with Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District's Planning
Division and have determined the criteria regarding Murrieta Creek's improvements in order to
proceed with the designs of the proposed First Street and Western Bypass Corridor Bridge
,,~--.rossings.
· ,le 45 day review period of the Draft Environmental Impact Report ended on January 23, 1995
and we are awaiting comments from the State Clearing House
TO:
-FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
MEMORANDUM
Joseph Kicak, Interim Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Brad Buron, Maintenance Superintendent
March 1, 1995
Monthly Activity Report - February 1995
The following activities were performed by Public Works Department, Street Maintenance Division
in-house personnel for the month of February 1995:
II.
III.
IV.
Ve
VI.
SIGNS
A. Total signs replaced
B. Total signs installed
C. Total signs repaired
TREES
A. Total trees trimmed for sight distance and street
sweeping concerns
POTHOLES
A. Total square feet of potholes repaired
CATCH BASINS
A. Total catch basins cleaned
RIGHT-OF-WAY WEED ABATEMENT
A. Total square footage for right-of-way abatement
GRAFFITI REMOVAL
A. Total locations
B. Total S.F.
STENCILING
A. 129 new and repainted legends
B. 0 L.F. of red curb new and repeinted
C. 360 S.F. of sandblasting/grinding
VII.
41
3
1
15
823
27
44,400
33
10, 157
MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT- February 1995
Page No. 2
Also, City Maintenance staff responded to 29 service order requests ranging from weed abatement,
tree trimming, sign repair, A,C. failures, litter removal, and catch basin cleanings.
This is compared to 14 service order requests for the month of December, 1994.
The Maintenance Crew has also put in 206.5 hours of overtime which includes standby time, P~M.
surveillance (weekends only), and response to street emergencies.
I.P.S. STRIPING AND STI:NCILING COMPANY has comoleted the following:
13,562 L,F, of new and repainted striping
0 L,F. of sand blasting
The total cost for I.P.S. striping services was ~12,205.37 compared to 80,00 for January, 1994.
PFSTMASTFR SERVICFS has comoleted the following:
· 0 sites, 0 S.F. of right-of-way weed control, total cost ~0,00 compared to ~0,00 for January,
1994.
Public Works PW94-12, FY94-95 Slum/Seal Project has been completed. This project
included slurry sealing, crack sealing, treating of all oil stains, and replacement of all stripping
and street legends for a total of 20.5 miles total cost of this project was ~186,940,89.
The total cost for Street Maintenance performed by Contractors for the month of February, 1995 was
$348,656.63compared to $154,973.10for the month of January, 1995.
Account No. 5402
Account No. 5401
$348,655.63
~3,949.02
CC:
Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects
Raymond A. Casey, Principal Engineer - Land Development
Martin C. Laubar, Traffic Engineer
MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT- February 1995
Page No. 3
STREET MAINTENANCE CONTRACTORS
The following contractors have performed the following projects for the month of December.
NELSON PAVING
Account No. 540.~
Date: February 3, 1995
Nicolas Road at Calle Medusa
A.C. Street Overlay
Total A.C. 50 Tons
Total S.F. 5,400
Total Cost: $2,450.00
Account No. 540')
Date: February 3, 1995
Rancho California Road
A.C. Street Overlay
Total A.C. 10 Tons
Total S.F. 1,640
Total Cost: $1,500.00
Account No. 540~
Date: February 3, 1995
Ynez Road North of Jedediah Smith
Emergency A.C. Street Repairs
Total A.C. 56
Total S.F. 6,120
Total Cost: $2,754.00
MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT- February 1995
Page No. 4
Account No. 540~
Date: February 16, 1995
Pals Road between Loma Linda and Bridge
Emergency Pothole Repairs
Total A.C. 8 Tons
Total S.F. 3,000
Total Cost: $1,350.00'
Account No. 540~
Date: February 17, 1995
Emergency Pothole Repairs "Old Town"
Total A.C. 8 Tons
Total S.F. 3,000
Total Cost: ~1,350.00
Account No. 540~
Date: February 22, 1995
Emergency Pothole Repairs
Rainbow Canyon Road end various
Total A.C. 8 Tons
Total S.F. 3,000
TotaiCost: ~1,350.00
Account No. 540~
Date: February 28, 1995
Pauba Road West of Via Rami
Remove and Replace 354 S.F. of A.C.
Total A.C. 8.5
Total S.F. 354
Total Cost: $1,622.50
r:,%reads~mT~gS'~02 .kg
MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT- February 1995
Page No. 5
MONTFL;ONI: I:XCAVATING
Account No. 540~
Date: February 17, 1995
Emergency Debris Removal
Various Locations
Total Cost: ~1,626.00
Account No. 540~
Date: February 16, 1995
Emergency Debris Removal
Various Locations, Cleaning streets in the City
Total Cost: $2,032.00
Account No. 5402
Date: February 10, 1995
Emergency Road Grading for John Warner Road - Liefer Road -
Walcott Lane on February 10, 1995
Total Cost: ~768.00
Account No. 5401
Date: February 15, 1995
Emergency Work
Jedediah Smith end John Warner Roads
Removal of silt and debris from channel on 2/9/95 & 2110/95
Total Cost: 83,470.00
II
4
.DATE
02-02-95
02-03-95
02-03-95
02-03-95
02-03-95
02-03-95
02-03-95
02-03-95
02-06-95
·-06-95
02-06-95
02-06-95
02-07-95
02-07-95
02-07-95
02-07-95
02-09-95
02-14-95
02-16-95
02-21-95
~ 21-95
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBUC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
GRAFFITi REMOVAL - FEBRUARY, 1995
.~.~...,, .....,..,~ .,~r.,.,..,..~....:.=.,""~ ,,,,.'....;,x~, ....~.,.',..,.~ ..,,.,:, ~,~.,..~.; .............CbMPLETED ........"' ~:':'""" :' "' "'
...,,~, ,. ,,: ,..~,....!~.~; ~,~..,..,~...,..:~. ~..0~.,~.....,,,~ .................. ,,.~......, ..........:~': .;, .:.:..... ~...,', ....... :... ,: ,.W{~RK:;':' ;. ~"'..".' .......,, '."'.'
, ~ ,,,~,,,?, .~,!,, ""~":. . . .,:=,,~:;.,~:,,,.," ": . ,,,:,,~ .~,,...,.' ,
'."'r''..',' ' ".., ,~LOCATION-... ......: "~>','.~ '> ..... ,.~..'~,,,.. .......;~:"!~:'/" '~;'~.' ~'''' "r.; '..:..'.' ;~:.'......'.., ,' .";,~?.t>'~":..:..t~':'
I La Serene @ Camino Corto IRemoved
Nicolas WIO Via Lobo
Margarita ~ N, General Keamey
Margar'Ka ~ Cima del Sol
La Serena @ Corte Camino
Southern Cross ~ Rancho Vista
Joseph Road ~ Santa Gertrudis
Channel
Margarita @ Moraga
N. General Kearney @ Santa
Gertrudis Channel
Hwy,79 N ~ Santa Gertrudis
Channel
Margarita @ Santa Gertrudis
Channel
28550 Pujol Street
28550 Pujol Street
Pina Colada @ Via Norte
Margarita @ Santa Gertrudis
Channel
Ynez @ Santa Gertrudis
Channel
Front Street @ Del Rio
Margarita Road @ Rancho Calif,
Road
28900 Front Street
Santa Gertrudis Channel
@ 1-15
4 S,F, of Graffiti
Removed 5 S,F, of Graffiti
Removed 80 S,F, of Graffiti
Removed 23 S,F, of Graffiti
Removed 20 S.F. of Graffrti
Removed 10 S,F, of Graffiti
Removed ' 960 S,F, of Graff~i
Removed 120 S,F, of Graffiti
Removed .615 S,F, of Graffiti
Removed 644 S,F, of Graffiti
Removed 316 S.F, of Graffiti
Removed 1,250 S.F, of Graffiti
IRemoved 10 S.F, of Graffiti
Removed 285 S,F, of Graffiti
Removed 883 S,F. of Graff'~i
Removed
IRemoved
Removed
IRemoved
Removed
Pala Road @ Condos
Removed
200 S,F, of Graffiti
120 S,F. of Graff'~
20 S,F, of Graffiti
675 S,F, of Graffiti
120 S,F. of Graffiti
120 S,F, of Graf~ti
'1
GEAFPEII- NOVh"MR~ 1994
02-21-95
02-22-95
02-22-95
02-22-95
02-22-95
02-24-95
02-27-95
02-27-95
02-27-95
02-28-95
02-28-95
02-28-95
Front Street 'Baja"
I-15 (i Empire Creek
27780 Front Street
I-15 ~ Best Western
Front Street ~ Via Montezuma
Pauba ~) Meadows
Santa Gertrudis Channel
~ Winchester
Channel Pliers ~) Empire Creek
Jefferson ~ Burger King
27727 Jefferson
Jefferson ~ Burger King
Margarita SIO Moraga Road
Remove
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
IRemoved
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
Removed
216 S.F. of Graffiti ~
250 S.F. of Greffiti
420 S.F. of Graffiti
1,180 S.F. of Greff'rd
32 S.F. of Graffiti :
I S.F. of Graffiti
30 S.F. of Graffiti
1,290
30
198
15
15
S.F. of Graffiti
S.F. of Graffiti.
S.F. of Graffiti
· S.F. of Graffiti
S.F. of Graffiti
TOTAL
LOCATIONS
TOTAL $.F.
33
10,157
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBUC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
WORK COMPLETED
FEBRUARY 1995
CA TCH BASINS
i~ ?.:~:"~::: ...... !. ":.~',.!: ....., ~ . .. '.~:, .' ~.~. '~::::.',~:'~ ....:..i.
02-14-95 Areas #3 & 14 Cleaned 20 Basins I
02-14-95 Areae #1 & #2 ·
Cleaned 7 Basins
TOTAL
CATCH
BASINS
CLEANED
-1- pw031zede%wkeqgM~SV)2.CB 030696
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBUC WORKS
~ROADS ,DIVISION
WORK COMPLETED - FEBRUARY, 1995
STREET STENCIUNG
02-06-95 Diaz Road SIO Winchester Repainted 20 Legends
02-07-95 Old Town Repainted 30 Legends
02-16-95 Old Town Repainted 47 Legends
02-22-95 AREA #1 Repainted 22 Legends
02-23-95 AREA #2 Repainted 10 Legends
TOTAL STENCILS 1 ~9
REPAINTED
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBUC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
WORK COMPLETED - FEBRUARY, 1995
R.O.W. WEED ABATEMENT
02-01-95
02-02-95
02-02-95
~02-08-95
02-13-95
02-13-95
02-27-95
02-28-95
,""'~-.28-95
Vie Lobo Channel
La Serene (i Margarita
40145 Calla Torcida
Meadowview e~ee
Front Street 6)
Del Rio Raze
6th Street ~b Marcedes
Rancho Calif. Road
W/O Meadows
Rancho Calif. Road
W/O Bahis Vista
Margarite ~ La Serene
Way
Removed 2,700
Removed ' 3,500
Removed 250
Removed 8,150
Removed 300
Removed 3,700
Removed 5,400
Removed 5,400
Removed 15,000
,, , ~.~.. ;~, ~ ~1 ,.., !!l~'~?". "~.%~ ~' ~"r~'~',
S.F. of R.O.W. Weed~
S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds
S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds
S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds
S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds
S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds
S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds
S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds
S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds
44.400 TOTAL S.F.R.O.W.
WEED ABATEMENT
DATE
02-08-95
02-08-95
02-14-95
02-14-95
02-16-95
02-23-95
02-24-95
02-24-95
02-27-95
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
TREE TRIMMING - FEBRUARY, 1995
Pauba Rood (~ La Primevere
La Sierra ~) Los Nogales
27971 Front Street
Pauba Road EIO Villa Altures
Front Street SIO Rancho California
Quiet Meadows ~) Santiago
Trimmed
2 Trees
Trimmed
Removed
IRemoved
Trimmed
Trimmed
Trees
Tree "Rein"
Tree
Trees
Tree
San Pasqual Road
Rancho Vista EIO Mira Loma
Ave. Sonoma ~) Margarita
I Trimmed
I Trimmed
ITrimmed
TOTAL
TREES
TRIMMED
TOTAL
TREES
REMOVED
I
I
5
1
2
19
2
Trees
Tree
Trees
-1- F~o~vkm~C~Tm, moss
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBUC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
WORK COMKWTED-FEBRUARY, 1995
SIGNS
02-01-95 I Margarita Road N/O Santiago '1 Repaired
02-02-95 Margarita Road N/O Rencho Replaced
02-02-95
02-02-95
02-02-95
02-02-95
Catifomla
La Sarena O S. 6en'l Keamey
La Sarena 0 Camino Core
Nicolas Read E/O Via Lobo
Nicolas Road N/O Via Lobo
Replaced
Replaced
Replaced
Replaced
02-07-95
02-07-95
02-07-95
r""..13-95
'v/-14-95
02-15-95
02-15-95
02-17-95
02-21-95
02-21-95
02-22-95
02-23-95
02-23-95
02-24-95
02-27-95
27-95
02-28-95
Margarita li
Rencho Catif. Road
I Mercedes ~) 6th Street
Target Center
Pauba WIO Remi
Rancho California Road ~)
Yukon
Pals Road 0 Highway 79 So.
Rancho California Road ~)
Target Center
Winchester (i) Jefferson
Single Oak (g)
Business Park Drive
Ave. Barca
Ynez Road N/O Palm Plaza
De PortoIs 1Oi Ynez Road
Rancho Colifomla Road Q)
Town Center
Ynez Road ~g) Via La Cotinas
Core Tolano Q) Ave. Sanores
Av. Sonores & Margadta
Corte Alhambra (i) De Is Reins
Replaced
IReplaced
Replaced
Replaced
Replaced
Installed
Replaced
Replaced
Replaced
Replaced
Replaced
Replaced
Replaced
Replaced
Installed
Replaced
Replaced
W-11, 2R-26D
R-26D 'T.C.'
R-26D
Graffid
R-1 E.G.G.
8 Carsonites
W-56 Type "N"
W-41 "T,C,'
R-1 Grsffiti
2 Delineators 'T.C~"
R-26 'T.C.'
R-7 & "K" Marker 'T.C."
2 C.I.P. Signs
5 Delineators 'T.C.'
'K" Marker "T.C."
R-1 'T.C."
R-26 D 'T.C.'
T.P.D. Directional stolen
Type 'N' faded
2 "K' Markers 'T.C."
3 'K' Markers 'T,C,'
R-1
R-1 "Graffiti"
R-1 + Type "N'
SIGNS - FEBRUARY, 199~
02-28-95
Psubs Road WIO
Msrgarits Road
Replscsd
TOTAL SIGNS REPLACED 41
TOTAL SIGNS INSTPI m Frs '3
TOTAL SIGNS REPAIRED .1.
! I
TRAFFIC REnUESTS
TRAFFIC DIVISION
Monthly Activity Report
For February, 1995
Submitted by: Joseph Kicak
Prepared by: Marty Lauber
Date: March 16, 1995
TRAFFIC 'REQUESTS:
Dec. Jan. Feb.
Received 6 4 9
Completed 6 3 5
Under Investigation 5 9 8
Scheduled for Traffic Commission 3 2 I
II.
DIVISION PROJECTS:
A.
The Traffic Division has added additional roadway delineation at the intersection
of Margarita Road and No. General Kearny Road to reinforce proper
channelization. Raised pavement reflectors have been placed along lane striping
on each approach to the intersection.
Be
Received City Council approval for Traffic Engineering Firms to design interim
traffic signals on State Route 79 (S) at Margarita Road/Redhawk Parkway, Pala
and La Paz St. As soon as project contracts are executed, design work will
begin.
C:
The Public Works Department has entered into a project with the City of
Murrieta, WRCOG and Hank Mohle and Associates to update the Southwest
Area Planning District - Travel Forecast Model. This will allow staff the
opportunity to test various roadway improvement projects to gage City wide
traffic impacts.
De
Issued a work order for the re-striping of Ynez Road in the area of Tierra Vista
Road. This project is designed to provide a protected left turn movement from
Northbound Ynez Rd. Additional roadway construction is required to
accommodate striping changes.
Ee
We also issued a work order for modification of Ynez Rd. Northbound left turn
pocket at Rancho California Road. Left turn vehicles extend out of the existing
turn lane during peak periods. Our changes extend the turn lane through the
intersection of Rancho Highland Drive.
r:~no~ctrpt~rai~95~O1 .fsb
TEMECULA COMMUNITY
SERVICES DISTRICT
ITEM
1
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
CITY OF TEMECULA
COMMUNITY SERVICE DISTRICT
FEBRUARY 14, 1995
A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Community Services District was called to order
Tuesday, February 14, 1995, 8:14 P.M., at the Temecule Community Recreation Center,
30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California, President Ronald Roberrs presiding.
PRESENT: 5 DIRECTORS: Lindemans, Muf~oz, Parks, Stone, Rotarts
ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None
Also present were City Manager Ronald Bradley, Assistant .City Manager Mary Jane
McLarney, City Attorney Peter Thorsen and City Clerk June S. Greek.
PUBLIC COMMENT
None
CONSENT CALENDAR
It was moved by Director Stone, seconded by Director Lindemans to approve Consent
Calendar Items No. I and 2 as follows:
1. Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of January 24, 1995
2. Maroarita Park Site
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve the Design Services Agreement of $91,100 with Alhambra Group
Landscape Architecture for the Margarita Park Site Project.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 5 DIRECTORS:
NOES: 0 DIRECTORS:
ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS:
Lindemans, Mu~oz, Parks, Stone, Robarts
None
None
COMMUNITY SR:IVIC;:S DISTRICT MINUTI:R FI:BRUARY 14, 1995 ~
GENERAz MANAnER'S RI:PORT
None
DIR~:CTOR OF COMMUNITY Sq:IVICFS R~=PORT
Director Nelson stated department staff was advised last week that the City received a
Facilities Design of Excellence Award for the Community Recreation Center from CPRS.
Director Nelson said Mayor Stone and CSD President Ronald Robarts will be accepting the
award at the Annual CPRS Conference on March 4, 1995.
Adjoumment
It was moved by Director Stone, seconded by Director Parks to adjourn at 8:19 P.M. The
motion was unanimously carried.
The next regular meeting of the City of Temecula Community Services District will be held
on February 28, 1995, 8:00 P.M. at the Temecula Community Recreation Center, 30875
Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California.
President Ronald H. Robarts
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
ITEM 2
APPROV
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFRC
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
Board of Directors
FROM:
Ronald E. Bradley, General Manager
DATE:
March 28, 1995
SUBJECT: Parkview Site Improvement Project - Phase I and Phase II
PREPA Phyllis L. Ruse, Senior Management Analyst
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors:
Approve Amendment No. 2 of ~28,425to the design contract with RJM Deign Group,
Inc. for Phase I and Phase II of the Parkview Site Improvement Project. '-
Appropriate $27,625 from Public Facilities - Development Impact Feea to the Capital
Projects Account.
BACKGROUND: Phase I of the Parkview Site Improvement Project is for the construction
of a fire station on Pauba Road west of Margarita Road and the off site street improvements
to Pauba Road. Phase II of the Parkview Site Project will provide a small detention pond and
improvements to a portion of the channel in the Rancho California Sports Park. On February
28, 1995, the Board of Directors approved Amendment No. I to the Parkview Site
Improvement Project to include Phase II in the project. Amendment No. 2 will provide the
following design components.
First, staff is requesting that the Board approve an additional $27,625 for the design of the
half width improvements to the north side of Pauba Road between Mergerira Road and the
eastern boundary of the Lutheran church site. The additional street end sidewalk
improvements will enhance traffic circulation, improve public safety, and will provide
pedestrian access and expanded recreational opportunities.
Second, RJM Design Group has determined that the original Parkview Site topographioal
survey needs to be modified to provide the necessary base sheets due to increased siltation
that has affected the chennal's elevation. The cost for the expanded tope is ~800.
Finally, the Board of Directors directed staff to include additional design services to add the
waterfall infrastructure along with the construction of the channel amenities. RJM Design
Group has indicated that they will design the water features to include an oversized vault and
utility stub outs to accommodate a future waterfall feature. This work will be completed as
pert of their original contract at no additional cost to the City.
The designer has suggested that the City install the pipe at the time the mat of the waterfall
feature is constructed. Insta~stion of the pipe would require full design of the waterfall,
including grading 'pierks. GracFmg to install the pipe would disturb the slope end necessitate
extensive erosion control measures. The designer also expressed concern that the pipe would
degrade while not in use.
FISCAL IMPACT: Cost of design services of Amendment No. 2 for construction drawings
and construction administration is $28,425. It is recommended that 827,625 be 8ppropriated
'from Public Facilities - Development Impact Fees to Account No. 210-190-626-5802.
Sufficient funds exist to fund the $800 cost of modifying the topographical survey.
~MENT NO. 01 TO CONTRACT ORDER NO. 16397
Parkview Site Improvement Projea
M~rch 98. 1995
The Agreement dated Cletober 11. 1994 between the City of Temecnln, and 1UM r~esign Gro~lp,
Inc.. (hereinafter ~ to as "Agreement") is IRn~y amended as follows:
Pc: ADDITIONAL SERVICES
Reefion 1
Scope of Work is hereby amended to include additional services as described in Exhibit "A"
(attached).
Compensation for these additional services is a not to exceed $28,425 to be paid in accordance
Section ·
All other terms and condilions of the Agreement shall remain the same.
The parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date and year first written above.
CONSULTANT
C1TYOFTEMECULA
By: By:
Jeffx~ E. Stone, Mayor
Peter Thorson, City Attorney
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
Mar. 13 '95 14:55
~l:14F~ ser%ws
P, 2
IIBCRIFTION OF
1.0
PAIK VIEW arrE DDROVEMBNT PROJECT
(PeaIra Rind dr-die Feed im,__o,a: INs)
DESIGN
Pa'fm'm field survey of Pauba Rod from proprood church site m Marprim Road.
Survey dull combt of crou fia~,~ t of Paba ltmd at Z0' himyah indicating lxecim
aisdal paveera elevt~on~ dons with the loml~ ~! elevation of exbtini udlby
2,0
CONSTRUCTION
Civil P-,~,l n_lnl (m~lltlo~ off .le ~ i,.p~vt -~e~.t, l>fod_cod as pm of bite bid
Prepme final designs mi plea rdgve to chrl] antinMdnl includbag sits and
mad plato.
Pepare one mof Stree~anm Plato forthe northerly 1/2 width of Peba
Road from the ear, erly property line of the pmpoid Lmheran Church ,its to
Marprita P, oad in sc_-oL'dance with the standard requiremere of the City of
T~_ L_ls.
The Irade and meet crone shall conform as close u pouible to the
esisdnf Fade and sectioN. Improvemere plans dull provide for a wideeinl of
Ptuba Road from the e0dainI northely edp of pavement to the ultimate
northerly curb lot, don. h.-rovm required urmhedy of the exi,tinl
cenm'Lke of Pnba Road are not included wifhh this scope of work.
b. Tr~Re b,.blh~
Prqare one set of Sipinl and Slripini Plans for d:te propmeet roadmy baud
upon the flal improvmms plans prc~-~4 by Cor.-,i,*q, and Ib madm'ds and
requiremine of the approF'im F, ve---- wnul .hurigicdonal qencT.
Prepare a Find Quand~ and Cm Embn~ bued on the lapmvemem plato for huba
8radialend !mprovememl)llmapiM~edbTtboCity.
INIleamdel411emed' p,a~-~" !elel
rjar. 13 '95 14:56 SI:I%=l:IXS2G~ se~es P. :3
JarRare t,~hni:-' qr~J~c at ~cr - cmfformlnl wJlh the most recent: mpp!lcable gmMm'dm and
· city of Tanran "bone ha* provided by the city for:
-Gerard Conditka--
-Special Pfovitionl
· city ot Tememh Stmsdmd PIn and Specieadorn
· SUndm'd Specd~c=dm, fc~ Public Works Coamnmlon C'Ore-: 12c~"), ~
odJdoa.
State of California Standard Spect~adons and Standard PIns, iafmt didon.
~. 9-~,
4.0 CONSTI~ON ~T!ON PHAII
provide --ml-.,,~ for any rim. film fir m, ision to the comrm for oommaebs.
drawbPndrdatedmbadtudsda!lborevbwedandretumedtotheconmlmatforqefoFjtm
erakin. TbeCrjmzv. l~'wrequemforhformiioa. proponlmquem. tndrdled~m,,q..~
dull IM lamded Io on a rquhr bib. Conu,.-,..r_',
Co-~'qqt on a monlbly buds in IccordlnCe wllb the lanoum of work conlpleted lid Ja
Icc~-('--~a wids tbe oontract4ocu~nr. At evefT job sito meetlag, rotnines datl
PublbkH md dblttetal by tbo Conmdunt to dl pattim concerned. apeclficdly noting curfeet
Itudmlmd eldmmM' ,---. k
l~Fd1'%. t '-Ill el; !IIIi
2of8
Har. l~ '95 14:56 ~/~F*I:IX52Ga ser~es P' ~
3of8
work shall be prqmf.i~.
I~k.lU' I| dillon
Alxemmemmion~dmllboorlmizodmdco,,dmyBdlobrlefdlpmim~~
lemal ml spedd requimuem of~he coms~for~. Pmcodurd maura, routing
Of inrormufir,% mi Inject rr~n,r "yes dull be defined. AUendees shall include
ropr pemtfivm from the City*s staff, the Consultant, the Comd~a ~f, and all mjor -dbCOn'rmmS.
Job me Marerip
ud chinira so the contract for construction are routinely ..onltocod. The Consultant shall
publish and distribute m fidd nlxtn for each Job tim neetin& dc~,moethl the profess of
construction and spee. ifk~y noting curtms and delinquent action item.
The Consultant shall review all ret~ shop ctrawjup and ~ated tutnnjUals u required by
contract documoms.
Atthecor'Fiafio,,of~boConsttuctionbafinalJobd~omoetinl (&o last of ~roo) andzeviow
of b alia fac~Jgy shall be continued. ^ final punch list win be ,blbhod and distributed by
the Consulant w dl pmlm concob ~wcl, specifically norths rmpired corrections, non-oonfonninl
work, and ~k rw. ~' 'q m k ~mpleeed.
Mar. 13 '95 14:57 Si:~A~ series P, 5
PHASE l: Dmjfn and Comamotion ])Nu~v~.~* fow additknml off. de mad iq,,mv/ vL
1 .o Dm . Deveaop.
2.0 Cmsmu:t~ DommmU
4.0 C0llllfUdk~ ALImi~bft
OmdFmTond
eln order to myra axmu!lmK mop on r~4oJiaphlc, primin,% ~hk, and
m, itboutmallestiondataTemeculaacaantbek--t,a'-,bhedealocdblgeWim~
for tin PerkHew its F:pro,atmi PrqJ~ (addlfioml huh Road OIf.4he Rotd
]nip-off . ds). This will save the dry .11:zoxj- ndy 10-205 city dbmunt and .o0:
mark-up)
S.3
AZmiTIONAL anrv'scsS
Sinvim widde ere am sit;F~aqy Mmlfied herHa m eervkm m be pezfmmid by ~ Z:)miJn
eap of bs cameltam ere eoqtd fr,;J "Addit~-~ $ervkm" tbr pupore of mb Ap;aaf~
CitYmmYl'equ~tbllJMl:hmiln(hxmppffformmylawbichm. oAdd:Mio~Servicm.
However. RJM Dmip Oroup is um oblllmed m perform rich Addilk,.-' Service, unim an
n"mqdh~N tO 'lJdl AJ~,_I fqt bll beell faHy eaecuted settinf form tho scopo, s-~e~lwle and fm
fur tml AddJtJot~ Setvia. In Ihe event R JR Demjp ~roup pOK~sud Additional SefvJ(NJ
beforo tecdpt of such aecuted -m,,mtmeet. the C.J~y acknowledge its oblipdon to lay for
Mfviees at RIM Dmip 0roup's stmdatd rates, within 30 daya Of receipt oflUM Dedgn Otmlp'l
Tb followtml item droll not {M spin of the fmo Idaraffled in the pays._ ' MCtion dxw'e, but
dulJbefedmbmtsddotoRJMDedBnGrmmp.
A. Addidoml :: t:'ne~ and ab vtsim m audubed by the City of Temeeulm
4 of 8
~ar.13 '95 14:58 SI:~F'~ series P. 6
S.4
!/uvlr~--~r ,,~t lwn!~m Report or CBQA
uder~Rm'awommacr.
A. City dial] provide accau to lira site,
City Js lo proyide any and dl tndemnj~cM~m, :~*r ~ dispoul or ol~ tactJoin
required, b7 local, mm or fMml law relurdinl htnrdou
D. City shall pay all ~r.~nu,eotal fee, md costa.
City dull require my eommactlou corn, from to indamalfy Comuitant firam mty and di
tomre. danape. clatms, expemm, including momey fees. and coma arbing out of the
eoausamr's work, s--sgtbaS only lossss, dsmsSes, dsims, es;sses includkS sUsssy's
fees and corn ~ m'e caused by I~s sole nellileace or willful misco~uct of PJM
Deliin Gigup I,qdlor I~bcollluhmr. in perfonnjllf Jl;I mervlem under bb
city will reindin that me corntraction eo~'a~t re add IJM Daip ~ and
m~ (Conwltmm) 8s m s~IPi,mmt inmarmd in the eoalprebmaivm Irarural
liability, auto limbllity, wortm' compr, dntion 8rid ImDder i inmarauce
5 of 8
glyds_ x J,S4M4
SI:i~F~ ser~es
~ Client slim lo laPJr Cmmultant a co',N'~ m:~q 1ix' d] amlxx. bad wink Mduded in
Scope of Serdcs liw~fofo retail, at tho hourly ate. Mow.
Blnbtls fir dl time nd msmdds sod eomrm~ e-~-,d,~ wodc sh~ bah s=cord~ with the
level of work~ sad will be brokea into the maSorks Ilsmd above.
Iza~/s~ov~r oe~~esah Aupst 1st In s~cordsnce w~ say Inca'ease In the Cosstnas's Pries
6of8
tssMIbsls&sSmmmsd', v'
Her. 10 '95 12:3~ St:~F~ ser~es P. 4
DESIGN GROUP, INC.
!'LOININ~ AND I~W,I!~3A.I'$; &RC~3~K~URI
7 of 8
~ylltS luS~
City of Ter~a
43174 ~uf~us hrk Ddve
TeeecrU, CA 92590
u~_._ PL, kview *Prod° Topo
This lettgr is u} ctmfmn your verbal autlmr~tkm today to ~ wilh obaining a plot of the
topo tms infomafi~ from avglabk~m'ial sumy dm~own in October 199~ forthe creek and
As tim is of aim ~msmu~, this work will r..ommma~, immediately mad !:m ~ompltqmd within
wst fow $800.
Thank ~ for this oppmumity to continue to work with tl~ Cixy of Te-mec~Pt.
Sheerely,
RjM Dedp Group, In~.
S928S LAS RAMaLAS, SUITS ue · MISSam V!WJO, cA rae~ · ('n4) m-vsm * FAX Ore) SIa. eGS
Her. 10 'c j5 1~:~ SI~I~F~ serzes P. 3
.:, DESIGN GROUP, INC.
AND I,ANDSCAIsJ AIC~R~
8 of 8
March 10, 199J
4~174 Bininto Park Dzivs
T~ ~ e:tttm. CA 92590.
R~ lsaA'visw "Ponds WSedall roemen,
services provided under the recent contract amendment spproved by Council. Thsm b no
additional chartres ,,ocisR~d with this work. Should the (::it), want design devmlolmmnt and
aammctioa doavm,mts for the waleffall ck~ncnt, to bid U an altonrots item, w~ would Ins happy
to Fovide you with an eVlmste at that time.
It is a pleasure to condnue working with you on this tnuu~sfing project.
A.I.A.,
a?'as IA$ IAMILAL $Urll ass · MIllION VlE$O, CA ~ * C/M) iTeM * FAX 4'/14) Sl34431
AMENDMENT NO. 01 TO CONTRACT ORDER NO. 16397
Parkview Sit= Improvement Project
Msrch ?8. 1995
The Agreement dated October 11. 1994 between the City of Temecula, and l~rM rL-sit, n Groqp.
Inc.. (hereina_f'ter referred to as "Agreement") is hereby mended as fonows:
Re: ADDITIONAL SERVICES
,~,eetion 1
Scope of Work is hereby amended to include additional services as described in Exhibit "A"
(attached).
Compensation for these additional services is a not to exceed $28,425 to be paid in accordance
with the contract provisions.
Section 2
All other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain the same.
The parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date and year first written above.
CONSULTANT
CITY OFTEMECUIA
By: By:
Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor
Peter Thorson, City Attorney
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
v:~elkvw.amd 031711
EXHIBIT A
P. 2
1
A.
Pm'ix~nfiddm-'YeyofPmbtRoadfrompmpmod~~to MmpdmP. oM.
Survey droll comjn of crms ,ec~,0_ s of Pmh Road a~ 50' h~ervds indictsel, pcecim
edninl puememc elevation donf with the ]ocm2on tnd deva~n of ubtinf u~JJL7
aplmzUm~.
Civil ~qliaesd~4 (MdlUon.d mY-elm road in,pmvamam produced m pm of bmo bid
Prepare find dmips and pin reM/ve m cfvU enlineednI tncludtnB site and
road pin.
Tbo Fade and m c,x>u sec-ir dudl conform u cime m promibis to the
ub~ue frode and ,morn. bmpiovmemt pin dmn provide ~ a widmhaa of
Pmba }.osd from tim eaisth~ normsfly edlo of pavmne~ to the oiltrusts
~ ~Plld~l Road m IMx lllchtded within flail ItCO~ Of M~:)rk.
b. M,,- .~wll)lql, PIn
lateprate m m of Slfnint end Slzipinl Plato fo~ the Fopon-' roadway based
upondmfin~ bnpmmmpmp~--,~byConmmot, mdmomodardsnd
rquirmmau of ~ho appop. hie Bo',~-, ~:' u .ludr, di~mml
Preparo a Find Qumtity and Cost wqt**,ate breed ~ the I.-,p,ovommt ptu for Pauba
Rold, Q~-~l:l'll / be couq)Oed ~ IclJed Ind l~mwlm.ler J]MdlX~rl~lm~ from b
Plar. l.l '~ 1~,:5~ 51qhFR><5~2~ ser~es P. 3
Papwin teclmicd spectftcador$ coamxzabi wlt the most ~ applicable sandarda and
· City of Temecula 'boilerplato' provided by ths City for:
-Gerard Conditions
-Special Provisions
-Notice ~ Bids, Contrm At,~.f2znt, Bid Bonds, Instructions to
· City of Tememla Standard Plmm and Speoffimtom
· Standard Speciflcatimm for Public Works Co~n ('arm'), tatat
edition.
· State of California Standard Spocifications and Standard Plans, let edition.
3.0 BIm)ING PHASE
mini ..,:e,e'_.
TIm Cer*ul,-,,t dadl assist Is Chy with tbo atddinl :Plum otr the projMt. Qup~c~.
clarificatlem, or conflicts ariainI out of due blddinf proam will bo rmolvod by addmda prepared
by the Consultant (maxiron,,, (2) two addends). ,tdde~da to b contm:t for construction shah
be prepared In writing to document an,/clarification or modification made to the coronet
4.0 CONSTIUCTION ADMINISTRATION PHiLeat
2 of
Mar. 13 '~ 14:56 Sf~t~F~ series P. 4
(tldrdvidl) wal4broslh and review. AftndPmadalistforaUrecjdredcoffsclasamd
.work dall be pr~pat.i.
During the Comtmcmm Phase of the proj~, me foaowiq rotvim shaU be mrnidamd:
Alalimmtni~kmcoafkraw. sdtdlbeorJanizsdmideoqd~tobrlefllllmftlmconcernldwllla
r,~,. rv~ tttvm from the City's staff, the Consultant. lhe Contractor, and all ramjog mabcontxamms.
publish and distrim I field report for each job tim meetin& ~-~m-whI, ibm propms of
construction anti spreeliP, sHy noting torrent md ddlmiuma salon items.
ProJect cbm-Out
work, and work ra _',dq,, to be oomplaed.
3 of
~4r.1~ '95 14:57 F:I:M~F~ serzes P. 5
S.3
sJ FEE f~ludJLE
It it the objective or ore' Dealart Tan co Za~vid, the most ~jve, yet eraelm maxaria
tothedevdoPmmtofttmaddjtjoftdPmballmdO&Sitoaoadlmpfovmnmm. Inpaitminl
In servicm Immmcler, ]UM Dedp OrouD hu or wm recedve faro..d~n pr~y~red or complied
by othen, the acmru~ and complecaum of which RJM DerJin Group is erameal to rely upon
PHA$~ I: Dedin and Comicdon Docanmm for additional or*NIle rood improveurea.
1.0 Dealan Devdopment
2°0 Comtmakm Docummts
3.0Biddi~
4.0 ~ ~drnintt**~k~q
120,12S.
S soo.
,m
~ ALLOWANCi
win order to save conreliant mark-up on reprographic, printbl, photolrtp~, and delivery
map0ases, it is our softestion that m Temecolm account be established st a local blueprlnt~o,,pdmy
for the Parkvim Sits Improy, -~t ProJect (additional Pauba Road Off-6Jte Road
lmprov~ ,__its). This wjli ave the city approxJmtdy 10-20% city discount and roT: :draw
mark-up)
AXmmONAL natvxcss
Servir.~wb.le are not flN. i~ny ideadried herein as re'vices w be perrotund by RIM Dmiln
Group bs ctmsuitme are comidered "~ddktoqi' Services' for l:mrposee of mb Asta Ter,,e
TM City my x, oqu,t eat ~M DedSn 0roup perform wvtm which are Add)do--: Services.
However, IUM Desip (3roup is not oblipmd to perf~m such A~Mtmd Services unlea an
a~=Adb,nt Io ~ AI~: ~rt ]m bemi hlly executod sefftnf fot~ the scolM, s-laedule md leo
fur such Additional Services. In the went PJR DosiF Group perfmma Additional Services
beforo receipt of such exocuted smmdment. the City acknowledges its oblifation to pay for such
services at RJM Ded~ Gmup'l st~,,d~,.d ram, within 30 dsys of receipt of RJM DesiF Oroep's
'1"b0 following hems ahall not b~ ·pm of the fee Jdenti~ed in the payment section above, but
dudl be mimburublo to RJM DedBn Group.
A. AdditMBIl mK,i~ aid I~o ~ ii Itilhor~ed by the City of TemecuJL
B. Prepsration of addmond TopoFaphic and Boundary
4 of 8
Mar.~3
14:58
!/uvUop,,,~,,,~, lmpm aspon or Ci~A ~w,.,~_ ~Y..~ if mluir~ droll k ~
msdsrsepsmm mm'act.
RJMDedlnGmuPlhlllProvjdethenmauryplandtoeitevishnsrequmtod bymo
cieyrortweplanehockroviews. A!lmbmpemchmgmdatlbe~oneinmxmlan~
with the artrated Standard Hourly Pee $ebedole.
A. City thai] provide acceu mem she,
B. City shsaa'pmvids ss mp-m-d~e title
Cs
City is to provide any and all tndanniflcation, ~- - t, dispmal or tuber ac~om
requfmJ by local, mm or fMerd law reprdinf hanrdom
City I1~11 pay all 2twsfnmental fees and costs.
City shall mpdrs say rossreaction contr mrs to indmmi~ Consultsat lama my and all
losses, damsis, clsbm, espmsm, ~dmli~g attorney fees, real costs sisfag mat of the
codu z~'s work, ~ceptlnS only losre, dresses, dsbns, mapms indudtnl moas,/s
fern and corn whida am caused by tim sole millfence or wilJfol miscond~ of
lhsiln. Orou~ ss~rer suhconssvltan,~ in perfo~ its services ~nder ltab
City w~! require ltmt me corntraction conu'an~ add ~H DMlp Group and
mnsuimm (Comultet) ss m addlib,m/insm'ed in the comp, ehmtsive pssrsl
llabfiity, auto liability, wox'ken' compmmstion md builder risk tmursace mverlps
rsquimt by the City,
5 of
14:58
SI::iNF~ serzes P.
S~
The Client qrees to lay Comulmnt as c~-.~r, iQ for dl amhofizwd work btduded In
the Scopo of See?ices hetttofofe slated, at the howly ram below.
I;tlNClPAL LAND~CAPIK ARC~ux~r
LANDSCAP/~ ARCaffECT
Di:~rON!~
SaN/OR DP-Arz~z-:~.xSON
3UNIOI Dlt.~x ~'~ON
Fret ,~ OBSERVATION
WORD PROCESSOR
$100.00 Per hast
188.00 per hour
I82.00 per hour
S.~.00 per hour
S4S.00 per hour
$88.00 pet hour
$3S.00por hour
Billhis ~ all time and minerIda and c~iiet extemion work dudl be in accordance wids the
level of work peffbnned find will be broken into rise catqories ILa~ above.
,FRR
Fees will be e~c,,~ated each Aulust ht in accordance w~ ny increase in the Commn='s Price
Index or other mutusL1y 8iteed upon cost index. BolJnninf wilh August 1, 1995.
All provbions for meahtiom stated, pemln to all contract extension and ,cMMoq-~ wott.
6of8
Hat. 10 '95 12:3& SI:II, FRX52e series P. 4
DESIGN GROUP INC
PL&NNIN~ AND L&ND6CAJ~ ARCI!IT~.'T(}~
of 8
//' ~
This letlet ts to cof~q~ )sour veftml .:ph,.n~mitm today to proceed with oblaininl a plot of the
Tl~udc you for thia el~Kn~udty ~o cominue m ~ork wire me city
Sincerely,
IU'M Dedln Group, Inc.
· , -,.I.A., A.
2?3$s LA$ aLAS, SUITS 240 · MISSION VmJ~ CA 9sin, (714) re-?sag · PAX ~'m) S$344~
rtar. 10 '~5 12:3~ SRNFa serzws
DESIGN GROUP, INC.
FLANNINGANDLANDHCA!~ARCifflT, C'!tIRE
8 of
March 10, 1995
RI~: hrkvimv *Pond' WaMz~D tle. aaeat
selvk:e$ provided tinder file racefit conilact ;m~mdment lipproved by Council. There i$ no
additional charSw ,,~iat~d with this work. Should tim City want desi/n development and
cemtruc~on~tsfor thc~elmn~nt, to bid as an alternate item, we would be happy
It is a pleasur~ to continue working with you on this InUreresting project.
Sincerdy,
RJM Bradins Gnmp, I~
A.LA.,
RJM/Ie
272BS LAS RAIMBLAI, ~ 2M, MIllION VIEIO. CA 9'2iN · ('714) f82,.?ele * PAx ('114) ~8244b
ITEM 3
APPROVA
GENERAL COUNSEL
FINANCE OFF~~
CITY MANAG
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
AGENDA REPORT
General Manager/Board of Directors
Peter M. Thorson, General Counsel
March 28, 1995
Consideration of Adoption of Resolution Approving the Master
Property Tax Exchange Agreement Between Riverside County and the
Temecula Community Services District Regarding Property Subject to
Annexation
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors adopt the Resolution approving the
Master Property Tax Exchange Agreement with the County of Riverside pertaining to
property subject to the annexation to the Temecula Community Services District, title as
follows:
RESOLUTION NO. CSD95-
"A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT, APPROVING THE MASTER PROPERTY
TAX TRANSFER AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY
SERVICES DISTRICT AND THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE UPON
ANNEXATIONS OF TERRITORY TO THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY
SERVICES DISTRICT"
BACKGROUND: Pulte Homes Corporation has filed a request with the Local Agency
Formation Commission to annex certain property within the City's Sphere of Influence to
the City. Under the provisions of California Revenue and Taxation Code Section 99 et
sea., each agency affected by an annexation must approve a property tax transfer
agreement for each annexation or may enter into a Master Property Tax Exchange
Agreement. Because Revenue and Taxation Code Section 99 only allows a 30-day period
to conclude the negotiations on property tax exchange or the annexation is terminated, a
o~8/qGP--3171.1
master property tax exchange agreement has its merits. Pulte has presented the City with
a draft of a Master Reel Property Tax Transfer Agreement for consideration, Pulte's agents
have represented to the City that the County of Riverside would be willing to execute the
Agreement as presented.
Because the Temecula Community Services District currently receives no share of
the real property taxes, and the services provided by the TCSD are separately funded, the
draft Master Real Property Transfer Agreement provides that no property tax shall be
transferred to the TCSD upon annexation of the territory to the City.
In the 'event, future annexations appear to have a financial cost associated with
them which would make them a financial burden to the City, the City may repeal this
Resolution and negotiate a property tax exchange agreement on a project-by-project basis.
In the event the future annexations are financially favorable to the City, adoption of this
Agreement allows the annexation process to be streamlined.
FISCAL IMPACT: Adoption of this Agreement which proposes no transfer of property
tax will have no direct fiscal impact on the TCSD as it currently receives no property tax,
A condition of approval of each of the projects Subject to the annexation will be entering
into the appropriate funding mechanisms for the TCSD.
ATTACHMENTS:
Resolution agreeing to the Master Property Tax Transfer Agreement.
ORANGe3171.1 -2-
RESOLUTION NO. ~
A RF_,~LY~FION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT, APPROVING THE
MASTER PROPERTY TAX TRANSFER AG~~ Bk;'I'W~:~:N THE
TEMECI~,A CO~ SERVICES DISI~ICT AND ~ COUNTY
OF RIYEESIDE UPON ANNEXATIONS OF TERRITORY TO THF~
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
WHEREAS, the County of Riverside and the Temecula Community Services District
("Temecula CSD") are the agencies whose public services would be affected by any
annexation to the Temecula CSD; and,
W~I~ekEAS, representatives of the County and the Temecula CSD have met and
negotiated an exchange for property tax revenue to become effective for areas annexed fo the
Temecula CSD beginning July 1, 1995; and, .
WHEREAS, this exchange for property tax revenue is in the best interest of the
citizens of the Temecula CSD; and,
WHEREAS, Section 99(d) of the C~lifornia Revenue and Taxation Code now
provides for adoption of a master property tax transfer agreement, which agreement may be
revised from time to time by the parties; and,
WHEREAS, the adoption of such an agreement would contribute to a reduction in
paperwork and to an increase in efficiency; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Temecula as the governing body of the
Temecula CSD desires to enter into a master property tax transfer agreement with the County
of Riverside.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE TEMECULA CSD DOES RESOLVE AS
FOT-TDWS:
Section 1. Upon annexation of territory to the Temecula CSD, no portion of the
property tax revenue generated within the territory annexed under the ad valorem tax rate
established by Article ~trr& of the Constitution of the State of California shall be transferred
to the Temecula CSD.
Section 2. The County Auditor is hereby requested to convert the above established
percentage figures into actual dollars, and thereafter to allocat~ such property tax revenue in
accordance with the provisions of Section 95 et ~. of the California Revenue and Taxation
09,adqOP'2715.1
Section 3. The City Council of the City of Temecula as the governing body of the
Temecula CSD hereby agrees to the exchange Of prOpCaty tax revenue set forth above and
approves this mas~ pa,puty tax agreement with the County.
Section 4. The City Clerk shall transmit a ten'rifled copy of this Resolution to the
Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, to the Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation
Commission, and to the Riverskle County Auditor pursuant ~o California Revenue and
Taxation Code Section
APPROVED AND ADOFrED, this day of
,1995.
Ron Robere, President
ATFF. ST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk/Board Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter M. Thorson, General Counsel
ORANOE: 27 1 ~. 1 2
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE)
CrrY OF TIU, IEL,'LA)
SS
I, June S. Greek, City C'I~~ Secreta~ of the Temecula Community Services
District, Nl:~h'Ry DO CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. __ was duly adopted
at a regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District
on the __ day of 199_ by the following roll call vote.
NOES:
BOARDlV~'IMBERS:
BOARDMEMBERS:
June S. Greek, City Clerk/Board Secretary
DEPARTM.ENTAL
REPORT
APPROV
CI~Y~:TTORN~/~
R CE OFR R
C MANAG
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
Board of Directors
PROM:
Ronald E. Bradley, General Manager
DATE:
March 28, 1995
SUBJECT: Departmental Report
PREPARED BY:
hawn
D. Nelson, Director of Community Services
Construction has begun on the interim fire station at the Lin~eld Schod site on Paube Road.
This project will provide fire protection on the east side of Interstate 15 until the permanent
station is competed. Two mobile units will provide housing and office space for a three-
person company and one engine. The project is scheduled for completion on March 31,1995.
The City anticipates use of the site for 12-16 months at which time the permanent faclty
should be operational.
On January 24, 1995, the City Council approved the Parkview Site Master Plan. The project
will be phased with the first phase being the construction of the permanent fire station on
Pauba Road west of Margarita Road. A second phase has been identified as the small
retention pond and channel improvements adjacent to the CRC and the large retention basin
at the northwest corner of the park. Staff anticipates bidding the second phase prior to the
end of this fiscal year and bidding the first phase by mid-August, 1995.
The City Council awarded the design contract for the Margarita Park Master Plan to The
Alhambra Group on February 14, 1995. Staff is in the process of establishing a project
committee to be comprised of City Councilmembers, Commissioners, interested member of
the public, the Temecula Valley Unified School District, sports organizations, and staff. The
site is a 20 acre parcel on Margarita Road west of Moraga and adjacent to the Temecula
Elementary School.
The plans for the sports field lighting project at Temecula Middle School have been submitted
by the designer to the Department of State Architect. The project will provide lighting for two
baseball diamonds, a soccer overlay, the track, and the football field. Staff anticipates the
project will be completed and ready for use by Pop Warner by September 1, 1995.
Pala Road Park construction is moving forward on schedule with an anticipated completion
date of April, 1995. The park will then enter into a 90 day maintenance period with a
tentative open date of July, 1995. The park improvements include a restroom/snack bar,
parking, tennis courts, basketball courts, soccer field, landscaping, and irrigation.
The Rancho California Sports Park Improvement Project is currently being advertised for bid
with · bid opening date of March 30, 1995. Staff anticipates the award of a construction
contract in April with construction to begin in May, 1995. Development of the 10 acre site
will complete the improvements to the northeast corner of the Park at Rsncho Vista and
Margarita Roads. The improvements will include perking, picnic facilities, a roller hockey rink,
· skateboard facility, restroom/concession building, landscaping and irrigation system.
_Plans for Sam Hicks Monument Park have been submitted to the Economic Development
Agency to ensure compliance with CDBG requirements. Staff plans on bidding the project in
April, 1995. The Temecula Valley Museum has received approved plans for the renovation
to St Catherine's Church and should be bidding that project prior to the end of March, 1955.
The Planning Commission has also approved the plot plan for the new museum facility to be
constructed at the park. The Public Works Department will be working with TCSD end the
Museum to ensure coordination between construction efforts on this project.
The restroom/snack bar at Kent Hintergardt Memorial Park is ready for final inspection and
acceptance, Staff anticipates the facility will be open for public use by the end of March,
1995.
Construction of Loma Linda Park Project - Phase II has been completed and the improvements
have been accepted after the 90 day maintenance period. The second phase is open to the
public and has increased the perk acreage by approximately one acre. The new areas include
a tot lot, open play areas, picnic facilities, landscaping and irrigation.
REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY
ITEM 1
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
FEBRUARY 14, 1995
A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Redevelopmerit Agency was called to order on
Tuesday, February 14, 1995, 8:20 P.M., at the Temecula Community Recreation Center,
30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California, Chairperson Ronald J. Parks presiding.
PRESENT: 5 DIRECTORS: Lindemsns, Mufioz, Perks, Stone, Roberrs
ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None
Also present were City Manager Ronald Bradley, Assistant City Manager Mary Jane
McLarney, City Attorney Peter Thorsen and City Clerk June S. Greek.
PUBLIC COMMFNT
None
CONSENT CALENDAR
It was moved by Agency Member Lindemans, seconded by Agency Member Roberrs to
approve Consent Calendar as follows:
1. Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of January 24, 1995.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 5 AGENCY MEMBERS: Lindemans, Mufioz, Parks, Stone,
Roberrs
NOES: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None
AGENCY BUSINESS
2. Coooarative Agreement with Old Town Main Street Association
Agency Member Stone stepped down due a conflict of interest.
Associate Planner David Hogan presented the staff report.
CITY OF TI:MPCULA R~:DFVI:I OPMFNT AttFNCY MINUTI:R
FFBRUARY 14. 1995
It was moved by Agency Member Mufioz, seconded by Agency Member Lindemens
to approve staff recommendation as follows:
2.1
Review and provide direction to staff on the proposed Cooperative
Agreement with the Old Town Mainstreet Association;
2.2
Appropriate $75,000 from the RDA Fund Balance to the RDA Economic
Development Line Item, Account No. 280-199-999-5264;
2.3
Authorize the Chairman to sign the final agreement with the Association to
implement the Main Street Program.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 4
AGENCY MEMBERS:
Lindemans, Mufioz, Parks,
Roberrs
NOES:
0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0
AGENCY MEMBERS: None
ABSTAIN: I
AGENCY MEMBERS: Stone
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
None
AGENCY MEMBER'S REPORTS
None
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Agency Member Stone, seconded by Agency Member Lindemans to
adjourn at 8:30 P.M. The motion was unanimously carried.
The next regular meeting of the City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency will be held on
Tuesday, February 28, 1995, 8:00 P.M. at the Temecula Community Recreation Center,
30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California.
ATTEST:
Chairperson Ronald J. Parks
June S. Greek, City Clerk
ITEM 2
APPROVAL
CITY ATrORN R~r:~t~
RNANCE OFRC R
CITY MANAGE
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Council
Ronald E. Bradley, City Manager
March 28, 1995
Redevelopment Newsletter
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council approve the appropriation of funds for
Redevelopment Newsletter entitled The Grapevine.
a second issue of the
BACKGROUND:
In November, 1994, the City issued the first edition of The GraDevine, newsletter of the
Temecula Redevelopment Agency. This publication was developed to keep citizens informed
about important issues and projects affecting the City and the Redevelopment Agency. The
cost of writing, editing, and copying the first edition totalled ~4,971. This price included the
cost of developing the format, layout, and logo of the newsletter. Mailing costs for 20,800
pieces, which were sent to residents and businesses, totaled ~2,050.00, bringing the total
cost of the first edition to $7,021.00.
The Grapevine was designed to be an ongoing communication medium between the City and
the residents. Therefore, staff is recommending that The Grapevine be mailed three times per
year, or every four months.
The second issue of The Grapevine will again be focusing on the Old Town Entertainment
Center Project. Following the public vote, it is important to keep citizens informed and let
them know what to expect with the upcoming project construction. This issue will be
prepared and sent out in approximately 30 days. The cost of publishing the second edition
is $3,423.00. The cost is less than the first edition because the format for The Grapevine is
already in place. The mailing costs will remain constant at t2,050, bringing the total cost of
the project to ~5,473.00.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Funding for the newsletter is provided for in the RDA Mid-Year budget request.
ITEM 3
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
I~PROVIT.
CITY ATTORNEER~~
FINANCE OFFI
CITY MANAG
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
AGENDA REPORT
Executive Director/Agency Directors
Genie Roberts, Finance Officer
March 28, 1995
Review and Approval of the 1994-95 Mid-Year Budgets
PREPARED BY: Tim McDermott, Chief Accountant
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 95-
A RESOLUTION OF THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 ANNUAL OPERATING
BUDGETS
DISCUSSION: Each year a mid-year review is conducted of the Temecula
Redevelopment Agency (RDA) operating budgets. The purpose of this review is to conduct
an analysis of revenues and expenditures to ensure that the Agency maintains a prudent and
healthy fiscal position. The Finance Department staff has performed an analysis of revenues.
Additionally, City staff has reviewed the operating budgets and has submitted year-end
expenditure projections.
Activity in each fund is presented in accordance with the following schedules:
Schedule A - Fund Summary: Illustrates activity in terms of the current budget, year-
to-date activity as of February 28, 1995, and the recommended mid-year amended
budget. Schedule A presents the beginning fund balance, revenues, expenditures,
operating transfers, and the projected ending fund balance based upon this activity.
Schedule B - Revenue Detail: Illustrates revenue detail by source in terms of the
current projections, year-to-date activity as of February 28, 1995, and the mid-year
revised projections.
Schedule C - Expenditure Summary: Illustrates summaries of expenditures in terms of
the current budget, year-to-date activity as of February 28, 1995, and the mid-year
revised projections.
LOWIMODFRATI: INCONF HOUSINn FUND
Based upon the recommended mid-year adjustments, the projected fund balance in the
Low/Moderate Income Housing Fund st June 30, 1995 is ~2,203,121, Projected revenues
reflect a ~72,486 net decrease from the original budget estimate, This decrease is comprised
of the following:
Tax Increment - A decrease of ~187,486 is anticipated in the 20% low/moderate
income housing set aside.
Investment Interest - An increase of ~ 115,000 is projected in investment interest due
to higher than anticipated rates of return earned on the Agency's cash and
investments.
An appropriation increase of ~3,223 is requested in personnel costs. An additional 5% of a
Senior Planner's salary costs will be allocated to the Low/Moderate Income Housing Fund due.
to the recent adoption of the five year housing plan.
CIP FUND
Based upon the recommended mid-year adjustments, the projected fund balance in the CIP
Fund at June 30, 1995 is ~6,861,352. Projected revenues reflect a 6183,250increase from
the original budget estimate. This increase is comprised of the following:
Investment Interest - An increase of ~152,000is projected in investment interest due
to higher than anticipated rates of return earned on the Agency's cash and
investments.
Rental Income - An increase of e31,250 is anticipated due to the extended lease
agreement with D.L. Reeves on the Jefferson Street property.
Appropriation increases totaling $180,664 are requested. Significant adjustments are as
follows:
Personnel Costs - An increase of $29,628 is requested due to the allocation of an
additional 25% of a Senior Planner and 20% of an Associate Planner to the
Redevelopment Agency CIP Fund from the City's Planning Department budget. This
increased personnel charge is the result of increased redevelopment activities due to
the adoption of the AB 1290 Implementation Plan.
Election Costs - An appropriation of ~50,000 is requested for the cost of the Old Town
Project advisory vote.
Sales Tax Reimbursement - An increase of ~52,036 is requested to reflect the
anticipated sales tax reimbursement due to Costco of ~ 154,986. This reimbursement
is based on the sales tax generated by Costco.
Legal Services - A $20,000 increase is requested.
2
Economic Development - A $10,000 increase is requested to continue the Agency's
economic development program.
'Other Requested Increases - Dues end Memberships (t500), Postage & Packaging
(RDA newsletter e3,000), Consulting Services ($7,500), Other Outside Services (small
business loan program ~3,500), Advertising (RDA newsletter ~4,000), Professional
Meetings (~500).
DEBT SERVIC; FUND
Projected revenues in the Debt Service Fund reflect a ~749,942 decrease in tax increment
revenue from the originally adopted budget. This results from a decrease in assessed
valuation.
Projected e~penditures reflect a net decrease of $264,264. This is primarily due to a
$265,264 decrease in the budget estimate for passthrough agreements to other local
governmental agencies. The decrease in the passthrough agreement amount is directly related'
to the corresponding decrease in tax increment revenue discussed above. A $1,286
appropriation increase is requested for the property tax administration fee paid to the County
of Riverside.
AUTHORIZED POSITIONS
The proposed mid-year adjustments will increase the allocation of City authorized personnel
to the RDA from 0.6 to 1.1 full time equivalent positions. However, a corresponding decrease
in positions is recognized by the City's Planning Department.
FISCAL IMPACT: Agency wide, the mid-year adjusted budget results in a net decrease in
estimated revenues of $639,178, and a net decrease of ~77,791 in budgeted expenditures.
Attachments: Resolution
Schedules A through C:
-Low/Mod Housing Set Aside Fund
-CIP Fund
-Debt Service Fund
I~Ee, OI,UTION NO. RDA ~-
A RESOLUT/ON OF THE TEV/EC~JLA I~EDEV~0PMENT
AGENCY AMENDING ~ FISCAL YEAR 1994-9S
ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGETS
WHEREIS, each year a mid-year review is conducted of all Temecula Redevelopment
Agency (P, DA) otwrating budgets.
WHEKEAS, the p~ of this review is to conduct an analysis of revenues and
expenditures to ensure that the RDA maintains a prudent and healthy fiscal position.
WffERF_AS, the mid-year review has been completed and the recommended adjustments
are reflected in Schedules A through C of the RDA Low/Moderate Income Housing Set Aside.
Fund; the RDA CIP Fund; and the RDA Debt Service Fund.
The Board of Directors does hereby resolve as follows:
Section 1. That the Fiscal Year 1994.95 RDA Low/Moderate Income Housing Set Aside
Fund Annual Operating Budget is hereby mendud in accordance with Schedules A through C.
Section 2. That the Fiscal Year 1994-95 RDA CIP Fund Annual Operating Budget is
hereby amended in accordance with Schedules A through C.
Section 3. That the Fiscal Year 1994.95 RDA Debt Service Fund Annual Operating
Budget is hereby amended in accordance with Schedules A through C.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPT!~ this 28th day of March, 1995.
ATTEST:
Ronald J. Parks, Chairperson
1une S. Greek, Board Secretary
[SEAL]
STATE OF CP,!-~ORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE)
CITY OF TEidECULA)
I FP~,RY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Board of
Directors of the Temecula Redevelopm~t Agency at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 28th
day of March, 1995, by the following vot~ of the Board of Directors:
AGENCY MEMBERS:
NOES:
AGENCY MEMBERS:
ABSENT: AGENCY I~IBERS:
June S. C,-reek, Board Secretary
SCHEDULE A
RBv6fiu8
Expenditures
Excess of Revenues Over Expenditures
Operating Transfers
Increase (decrease) in Fund Balance
Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 1994
Est. Fund Balance, June 30, 1995
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
LOW/MOD BET ASIDE
165 FUND SUMMARY
3,811,273
(2,Tg6,16e)
5,074,9t)
2,278,829
1,492,ea
(2,871,878)
(2,871,878)
5,074,866
2,203,121
8CHEDIA.EB
AQQT
NO LOWNOD~/rrASIDEFUND ·
4015 -Tax Inccement
4065 I.,/,llb,~l.a Intleelt
VARIANCE
1.425,006 820,253 1,237,eGo (187,4N)
140,000 101,927 255.000 1 :l 5,000
TOTAL LOWNOD; ABIDE FUND
17-MIr.05
165 LOWNOD FUND
NON DEFT-DEFT 199
-Personnel Services
-Operating Expenditures
-Operating Expenditures
-Capital Expenditures
ITOTAL LOW/MOD FUND
TEMECtJLA REDEVELOPIIgiT AGENCY
LOW/MOD BET ASIDE
EXPENDITt. X:IE BUMMARY
APPROPRIATION 02/28/95
14,262
102,634
0
4,244,368
4,361,264
16,771
0
3,811,273
FY944t
MID-YEAR
AMENDED BUDGET
4,244,368
VARIANCE
INCREASE
([)ECREASE)
,223
0
0
0
22.6%
0.0'P/
0.6%
·
0.1%
17-Mar-g5
SCHEDULE A
Expenditures
Excess of Revenues Over Expenditures
Operating Transfers (Out) -
Increase (decrease) in Fund Balance
9eginning Fund Balm, July 1, 1994
Est. Fund Balm, June 30, 1995
CIP
280FUNDSUMMARY
FY94-05
AMENDED
BUDGET
- 4,320,189 $
1,921,465
2,396,724
(8,785,931)
(6,387,207) $
13,245,973
6,858,766
4,111,307
734,861
3,376,446
0
3,376,446
$
$
F'Ygq,-G6
YEAR-END
PROJECTION
4,503,439
2,102,129
· 2,401,310
(8,785,931)
(6,384,621)
13,245,973
6,861,352
17-Mar.-05
8CHEDULEB
ACCT
NO CIP FUND
4065 .4,,,'eeb,,,e~4 interat
4048 ~ labrest
4068 4j:ari Feel
4072 -.SlJeofPmpety
4075 -.Rental Ineom
4090 -.Operltb~ Trmafe8 in
280 iTOTAL CIP FUND
248,000 218,888 400,000
7,800 4,214 7,800
500 250 500
3.744,368 3.744,3H 3,744,388
140,000 143,589 171,250
179,5~1 0 179,521
I 4.s~o. lael 4.111.s07 I 4,so~.,i3el
VANANCE
152,000
·
0
0
sl,ao
0
17-M~-O5
SCHEDULE C
280 CIP FUND
-,ION DEPT-DEPT 199
-Operating Expenditure~
-Capital Expenditures
Subtotal
OPERATING TRANSFER OUT
TOTAL CIP FUND
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
CIP
EXPENDITURE BUMMARY
30,494
761,438
0
1,129,533
1 ,g~21,465
8,755,931
10,707,396
11,013
528,364
0
195,484
734,861
0
734,861
FY94-95
MID-YEAR
AMENDED BUDGET
60,122
912,474
0
1,129,533
2,102,129
8,785,g31
10,888,060
VARIANCE
INCREASE
(DECREASE)
29,628
151,036
0
0
180,664
0
180,664
17-Mar-95
SCHEDULE A
DEBT 8ERVK3E
380 FUND BUMMARY
FYg4-g5
AMEhDED
BUDGET
5.809,57g
1,136,611
0
1,136,611
3,598,391
3,112,713
17-Mar-g5
8CHEDUI. EB
NO DEBT SERVICE FUND
4015 -Tex Increment
4065 -investment IntmMt
5.7O0,379
2,481,012
52,780
FYe4,e5
YEAR-END
PROJECTION
4,eso,437
loe,2oo
VARIANCE
I 380 TOTAL DEBT SE_R....V~.E FUND
5,059,837
(74e,e42)
17.Me45
SCHEDULE C
380 DEBT SERVICE FUND
NON DEPT-DEPT 1 it
-Personnel Services
-Operating Expenditura
-Operating Expenditures
-Capital Expenditures
TOTAL DEBT SERVICE FUND
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
DEBT SERVICE
EX]:r=NDITURE BUMMARY
0
4,672,968
0
0
0
1,896,496
0
0
FY94-95
MID-YEAR
AMENDED BUDGET
0
4,408,704
0
0
VARIANCE
INCREASE
(DECREASE)
0
(2e4,264)
17..Met-g5
ITEM 4
APPROVAl
CITY ATTORNEY
V\
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
Executive Director/Redevelopment Agency Members
,J~Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
March 28, 1995
SUBJECT:
Professional Services with Trans-Pacific Consultants for the Design of Phase I
of the Western Bypass Corridor
PREPARED BY:
Raymond A. Casey, Principal Engineer - Land Development
John Pourkazemi, Assistant Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Redevelopment Agency approve and authorize the Chairperson or the
authorized representative to execute an agreement between the City and Trans-Pacific
Consultants (TPC) to provide civil engineering services for the design of Phase I of the
Western Bypass Corridor for an amount not to exceed $451,928.60 and 10%
contingency in the amount of $45,192.86. The agreement will be subject to the
approval of the Executive Director and the General Counsel as to final form.
That the Redevelopment Agency appropriate $167,122 of RDA bond proceeds in the
Capital Improvement Program fund for the design of the Western Bypass Corridor
Phase I.
BACKGROUND:
The amount will include a lump sum contract for $365,843,60 for an "at-grade" crossing at
Rancho California Road and the Western Bypass Corridor and 10% contingency in the amount
of $36,584.36with a provision for the City Manager to approve an additional contract amount
of $94,693,50 which includes 10% contingency for the design of a "grade separated"
interchange should staff determine that to be most cost effective design alternative.
The scope of work for TPC is described in the attached proposal. The Western Bypass Corridor
is included in the current Capital Improvement Program. The schedule for the design of the
Western Bypass Corridor has been expedited pursuant to T.Z.B.G., Inc. proposal for the Old
Town Redevelopment Project.
-1 - r:%agdrpt%95%O328%rfp27 .agn
FISCAL IMPACT:
$330,000 is available in Capital Improvement Program Account No. 210-165-612-5802.
Although the disbursement of funds will be spread over Fiscal Year 1994-95 and Fiscal Year
1995-96 within the anticipated budget-amount, it is necessary to approve an additional
appropriation of $167,122in Fiscal Year 1995 in order to accommodate the entire contract
_amount for the Phase I design. Anticipated appropriations in Fiscal Year 1996 will decrease
accordingly.
Attachments:
1. TPC Contract
-2- r:%agdmt%g5~0328~p27.agn
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
Contract
PROFESSIONAL SERVICFS ~
This Agreement was made and entered into this 28th day of March, 1995, by and
between the City of Temecula {" City"), a municipal corporation, and Trans-Pacific Consultants,
Inc,, a California corporation {"Consultant"),
III ·
The parties hereto mutually agree as follows:
Services. Consultant shall perform the tasks set forth in Exhibit "A" attached
her.to. Consultant shall complete the tasks according to the schedule set forth in
Exhibit "A".
Performance. Consultant shall at all times, faithfully, industrially and to the best of
his ability, experience and talent, perform all tasks described her.in.
Payment. The City agrees to pay Cortsultsnt monthly, at the hourly rates set forth
in Exhibit "B" attached her.to, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks.
This amount will not exceed $365,843.60 for the total term of the Agreement
unless additional payment is approved by the City Council; provided that the City
Manager may approve additional payment not to exceed ten percent (10%) of the
Agreement; but in no event more than $10,000.
:
Consultant will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed. Invoices
shall be submitted on or about the first business day of each month, for services
provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of
receipt of each invoice.
Amendments. This Agreement may be amended so long as such amendment is in
writing and agreed upon by both the City Council and Consultant.
Ownership of Documents. Upon satisfactory completion of or in the event of
termination, suspension or abandonment of this Agreement, all original documents,
designs, drawings, and notes prepared in the course of providing the services to be
performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City
and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the City without the
permission of the Consultant.
Termination. The City may terminate this Agreement without cause so long as
written notice of intent to terminate is given to Consultant at least three (3) days
prior to the termination date. In the event of termination, Consultant shall be paid
for the services performed.
Indemnification· The Consultant agrees to indemnify and save harmless the City,
its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any end all claims,
demands, losses, defense cost, or liability of any kind or nature which the City, its
officers, agents and employees may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon
them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of
Consultant's acts or omissions under the terms of this Agreement, excepting only
liability arising out of 'the sole negligence of the City.
- 1 - r:~027~davids .agrlajp
e
10.
11.
Status of Consultant. Consultant is an independent contractor in all respects in the
performance of this Agreement and shall not be considered an employee of the City
for any purpose. No employee benef~s shall be available to Consultant in
connection with the performance of this Agreement.
Except as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other
compensation to Consultant forJ3erforming services hereunder for City. City shall
not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Consultant for injury or sickness
arising out of performing services hereunder,
Tqrm. This Agreement shall commence on March 28, 1995, and shall remain and
continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later
than March 28, 1997.
Default. In the event that Consultant is in default' for cause under the terms of this:
Agreement, the City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating
Consultant for any work performed after the date of default. Default shall include
not performing the tasks described herein to the reasonable satisfaction of the City
Manager of the City. Failure by the Consultant to make progress in the performance
of work hereunder, if such failure arises out of causes beyond his control, and
without fault or negligence of the Consultant, shall not be considered a default.
Any disputes regarding performance, default or other matters in dispute between
the City and the Consultant arising out of this Agreement or breech thereof, shall
be resolved by arbitration. The arbltrator's decision shall be final.
Consultant shall select an arbitrator from a list provided by the City of three retired
judges of the Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services, Inc. The arbitration
hearing shall be conducted according to California Code of Civil Procedure Section
1280, et see. City and Consultant shall share the cost of the arbitration equally.
Notices. Notices shall be given pursuant to this Agreement by personal service on
the party to be notified, or by written notice upon such party deposited in the
custody of the United States Postal Service addressed as follows:
City: City of Temecula
Attention: Ranaid E. Bradley, City Manager
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
Consultant: Trans-Paci~c Consultants, Inc.
Attention: Won S, Yea, President
27447 Enterprise Circle West
Temecula, CA 92590-4638
The notices shall be deemed to have been given as of the date of personal service,
or three (3) days after the date of deposit of the same in the custody of the United
States Postal Service.
-2- r:~027~jfdavids.agrlajp
12.
Froire Aoreement. This Agreement and any documents or instrument attached
hereto or referred to herein integrate all terms and conditions mentioned herein or
incidental hereto supersede all negotiations and prior writing in respect to the
subject matter hereof. ' '
In the event of conflict between the terms, conditions, or provisions of this
Agreement end any such document or instrument, the terms and conditions of this
Agreement shall prevail.
13.
LiabilitY. Except as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages,
or other compensation to Consultant for performing services hereunder for City.
City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Consultant for injury
or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder.
Consultant agrees to indemnify, release and hold harmless the City, its officers,.
agents, employees, and representatives for all claims or losses the City may suffer
resulting from any negligent actions or omissions by Consultant.
14.
Consultant shall secure workers' compensation insurance. Upon request of
Consultant, the City shall add Consultant to the City's workers' compensation
policy and the Consultant shall reimburse the City for the cost of said insurance
premiums. ;
Licenses. Consultant and subconsultant shall obtain all necessary licenses,
including but not limited to, City Business Licenses.
The parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date and year above
written.
CONSULTANT
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
By
Ronald Ho Parks, Chairman
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
-3- r:~027~jfdavids.agrlajP
FXHIBIT 'A'
TASKS TO BE PERFORMED
r:%O27~jfdevida.agrlejp
IV. SCOPE OF WORK AND ENGINE~'S APPROACit TO TIlE PROJECT. "~
SCOPE OF WORK:
o Task 1
ENGINEER will provide Aerial Topographical Mapping for the
Western Bypa~ Corridor fi'om Interstate 15 to the intersection
of Western Bypass Corridor and Rancho California Road.
o Task 2
ENGINEER w~l final{Te current alignment and constraints
study including some exploratory work necessary to determine
the potential utility conflicts (assuming $10,000 for research and
exploratory work).
o Task 3
o Task 4
o Task 5
o Task 6
o Task 7
ENGINEER will prepare a 1" = 100' scale preliminary grading
and improvement plans.
ENGINEER w~l provide agency permit processing, excluding
any environmental assessments.
ENGINEER will prepare and process final 1" = 40' scale
grading and improvement plans, including associated fight-of-
way documents.
ENGINEER will prepare and process final 1" = 5' scale bfid~
plans.
ENGINEER will prepare bid documents and specifications.
o Task 8
ENGINEER w~l prepare Conditional Letter of Map Revision
(CLOMR) documents and process to the Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA) for approval.
ENGINEER'S APPROACH TO THE PROJECT
1. Site Description
Phase I - Western Bypass Corridor is classified as a Secondary Highway with
a proposed alignment commencing from Rancho California Road running
southerly crossing Murrieta Creek via a proposed bridge and terminating at
the Interstate 15 and Highway 79 South Interchange. Vincent Moraga Drive
is an existing roadway with a 66 foot fight-of-way commencing from Rancho
California Road running southerly and terminating at Ridge Park Drive in
a knuckle configuration. Vincent Moraga Drive will be extended from Ridge
Park Drive in a southwesterly alignment to intersect the Western Bypass
Corridor. Improvements will be required at the new Vincent Moraga Drive
and Ridge Park Drive intersection. Front Street, south of Santiago Road, is
an existing roadway classified as a Major Highway and is presently a straight
roadway connection into Highway 79 South. Front Street will be realigned to
intersect the Western Bypass Corridor. The Riverside County Assessment
District No. 159 is currently in the process of ~nalizing the plans for the
Interstate 15/Highway 79 Interchange improvements which will require
extensive coordination with both the County of Riverside and the State of
California Department of Transportation.
Existing fire hydrants, air vacs, water meters, manholes and above-ground
utility junctions indicate that underground facilities exists along Vincent
Moraga Drive, Front Street, and Rancho Cnli{~ornia Road.
Several drainage courses traverse the proposed Western Bypass Corridor
alignment and will require close coordination with the appropriate
jurisdictional agencies.
2. Basic Understanding and Assnmptions
It is our understanding that the City of Temecula (CITY) is proposing to
construct Phase I - Western Bypass Corridor, extend the improvements of
Vincent Moraga Drive and realign Front Street of which both streets w~l
intersect the Western Bypass Corridor. The proposed improvements are
located along the southwestern boundary of the CITY and will be
constructed with asphalt concrete and the necessary subbase. The Western
Bypass Corridor will be improved with a seventy-eight (78) foot wide
roadway and approximately 2.4 miles in length. Vincent Moraga Drive wffi
be extended and will be a forty-four (44) foot wide roadway apprcr, clmately
0.4 mile in length. Front Street will be aligned to intersect the Western
Bypass Corridor and will be an eighty (80) foot wide roadway. Two
alignment alternatives for the Western Bypass Corridor intersection with
Ranch California Road will be provided. The first alternative will be an at-
IV.2
grade intersection, and the second alternative is a grade separate
intersection. The improvements will also consist of grading, storm dram,
installation, bridge construction, including the necessary channel
improvements, tr~fflc signal installation, roadway signing and striping, traffic
control and detouring, sediment and erosion control measures, relocation of
underground and aboveground utility facilities as well as demolition and
reloca~on of existing landscaping, irrigation lines and fences, existing
pavement re-construction and restoration and A.C. overlays. All erosion
control measures will be provided with non-irrigated methodology. All
available existing plans and documents necessary for design, preparation of
contract plans and construction will be obtained.
A blueline stream crossing the proposed alignment has bccn identified on the
U.S.G.S. 7.5 minute Tcmecula Quadrangle. Permits and agreements (1601,
401, 404) will be applied for and processed through the Federal and State
Regulatory Agencies. The intersection of the Western Bypass Corridor with
I15/SH 79 South will require significant coordination with the County of
Riverside's Assessment District 159 (AD 159) and the California Department
of Transportation. Since we are the design engineer for the AD 159, we are
in an excellent position to eliminate or mitigate potential and significant
design conflicts.
Hydrology report and hydraulic calculations wfll be provided to support th,""'.
storm drain facilities proposed for the project. A HEC-2 analysis associate
with the bridge crossing at Murrieta Creek will be provided to determine the
vertical alignment and allowable freeboard for the proposed bridge.
ENGINEER will provide new aerial topographic mapping. This will also
enable us to identify accurately limits of grading impacts to the adjacent
properties. Field survey support will also be provided as necessary to verify
the vertical and horizontal alignments of the existing roadways affected by
the Project. Slope easements, drainage easements, legal descriptions, letters
of agreement between the CITY and adjacent property owners and all
necessary maps and documents w~l be provided for the construction of the
proposed improvements outside the right-of-way. The design parameters wfll
be based on the "~restern Bypass Corridor Alignment Study" dated August,
1992 prepared by NBS/Lowry and LSA Associates and recommendations
made in the Western Specific Plan and associated Environmental Impact
Report which is assumed to be available during the preliminary design stages.
Due to grading and paving activities, a gcotcchnical investigation with grading
and construction rcconnncndations covering the identified limits of the
project will bc provided to ensure that the proposed. improvements arc
constructed to Standard Specifications and/or as required by the CITY.
Relocation d any existing facilities will require extensive i:oordination with
the appropriate agencies. Notification in writing of any reloca~on to these
agencies w~l be provided along with additional field surveys and site visits to
locate all existing facffities to ensure no obstruction and conflicts occur during
the construction stages. It is our understanding that all utility design will be
done by others and is not part of this proposal.
On August 20, 1992, the State Water Resources Control Board adopted the
National Pollutant Discharge l~.liminntion System (NPDES) State Gcncral
Construction Permit Order No. 92-08-DWQ (Permit). The Permit was
adopted to establish discharge requirements for storm water runoff
associated with construction activity. The NPDES Permit requires that a
Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan :(SWPPP) be developed and a Notice
of Intent (NOD be submitted to the State Water Resources Control Board
for the proposed project.
Street improvement plans, grading plans, bridge plans, storm drain plans,
traffic signal plans and all relevant plans necessary for the construction of the
project will be provided and processed through the CITY and the
appropriate agencies for approval. Metric system shall be incorporated into
all plans, specifications and related documents as per the C1TY's standards.
Bid schedule, detailed engineer's estimate, bid specification package including
bidders' instruction, bid sheets, general specifications, special provisions and
technical specifications using the CITY's boiler plate contract documents and
all other pertinent contract documents necessary for the construction of the
proposed project will be provided. Bid administration wffi be provided by
the CITY.
It is our understanding that all fees required by other public agencies for
their application processes, project review and permit issuance will be paid
by the CITY.
Construction staking is not a part of this proposal.
City will be respons~le for all reproduction.
3. Task No. 1 Approach
° Field Survey and Aerial Topography
Survey twelve aerial targets using Global Positional Systems
(GPS) and conventional techniques tied to the local state plane
coordinate system.
Perform aerial topography and provide digital topographic
mapping at 1 inch -- 40 foot scale with 1 foot contour interval
and 500 foot wide along those portions of the Western Bypass
Corridor from its intcrscction with Rancho California Road to
Interstate 15.
Task No. 2 Approach
° Obtain Existing Approved Plans and Documents for Design Reference
and Verification of Existing Right-of-Way and Easements
Street Plans and Right-of-Way documents:
o Obtain improvement plans for Vincent Moraga Drive.
o Obtain improvement plans for Front Street west of Interstate 1
and Highway 79 Interchange.
Obtain improvement plans for the Riverside County Assessment
District No. 159 Interstate 15 and Highway 79 South
Interchange Improvements.
o Obtain improvement plans for Rancho C, alifomia Road.
Obtain preliminary design plans for the First Street Extension
from the City of Temecula.
Obtain recorded maps of Parcel Map 12549, Parcel Map 18254,
Parcel Map 19626-1, Parcel Map 19626-2, Parcel Map 23968,
Parcel Map 23969, Parcel Map 18254, Parcel Map 21592, Parcel
Map 10814, Parcel Map 4559, Parcel Map 8248, Parcel Map
17288, Parcel Map 20090, Parcel Map 21690, Parcel Map 22515,
and Tract No. 4807 adjacent to the proposed horizontal
alignment of the Project.
° Storm Drain Plans and Hydrology Reports
IV.5
° Obtain all available storm drain phns and hydrology
information including maps, studies and topographic maps to
determine and evaluate the drainage areas tributary to Project
and the surrounding properties.
Sewer and Water Plans
Obtnin water plans along Front Street, Vincent ]v[oraga Drive
Ridge Park Drive and Rancho California Road from the
appropriate agency to verify existing waterlines and its
appurtenances impacting the proposed vertical and horizontal
alignment of the Project.
Obtain sewer and related plans along Front Street, Vincent
Moraga Drive and Ridge Park Drive from the appropriate
agencies to verify potential conflicts by the proposed project to
the existing sewer system of the adjacent properties.
Dry U ty Plans
Obtain gas plans, electric plans, telephone plans, and cable T.V.
plans and related information senring the surrounding properties
from appropriate agencies and purveyors.
Environmental Documents
Obtain a copy of the CITY's Environmental Assessment for the
project.
° Alignment and constraints study.
Field survey the vertical and horizontal alignments of the existing
surface improvements along Rancho California Road, Vincent
Moraga Road, Ridge Park Drive, and Front Street, existing
driveways, all existing aboveground appurtenances, overhead
facilities, existing storm drain facilities, fences, trees, shrubs and all
poss~le obstruction to the proposed project. Pothole to locate
existing Metropolitan Water District Aqueduct, Rancho California
water and Southern California Gas main.
Provide a 100 and 40 foot scale computerized hard copy of the
project with existing street centerlines, right-of-way, new and existing
aerial topographic overlay, field survey and research information
necessary for preliminary and final design.
Finalize the current alignment and constraints study showing
adjacent land ownership information.
5. Task No. 3 Approach
o Prepare a 1"--100' scale "engineered~, preliminary grading and
improvement plan.
Using the Final Alignment Study, prepare a 1"--100' scale
preliminary Street Improvement Plan incorporating the
recommendations made in the %Vestern Specific Plan" and
associated Environmental Impact Report in order to meet the
required design and feasible parameters of the proposed
project.
Using the preliminary Improvcmcnt Plan, prepare a 1"--100'
scale prclirnlnary Grading Plan to evaluate the grading impacts
to the adjacent properties.
Using the preliminary Grading Plan, providc a prcllminary
earthwork analysis to determine if a balanced project can be
accomplished.
° Prepare a preliminary Engineer's Estimate.
Coordinate and process the preliminary design for approval wi~
City Staff.
o Preliminary Bridge Plans
Review all pertinent background and supporting site data for
the design of the structure.
° Conduct a field review of the bridge site.
Conduct bridge type selection and prepare the Structure
General Plan and General Plan Estimate.
Bridge type selection will involve determination of the following
characteristics of the structure:
Span layout and span lengths.
Superstructure type.
Substructure and foundation types.
Railing and lighting requirement.
Architectural/Aesthetic treatments.
The bridge General Plan drawing will show structure plan,
elevation, typical section and structure type. This drawing will
become the first sheet of the bridge plans and wfll be used for
communication and coordination purposes.
From the General Plan drawing, the General Plan Estimate will
be prepared. This will serve to establish the structure's
construction cost for budgeting purposes early in the project.
Prepare bridge-related text for the Preliminary Engineering
Report.
Preliminary Storm Drain Plan and Hydrology Study
Using the pre'hminary Street Improvement and Grading Plan,
perform a preliminary hydrology study to determine the impacts
of drainage runoff both to the proposed project and the
surrounding properties.
Based on the preliminary hydrology study, prepare a preliminary
Storm Drain Plan and provide a preliminary hydraulic.
calculation to determine the pipe sizes necessary to
accommodate the drainage flows tributary to the project.
Adjust the preliminary plans as necessary to ensure proper
design coordination.
Coordinate and process the preliminary pl_a_ns and study with
City Staff and the appropriate agencies for approval.
Utility Coordination.
Evaluate the design impacts of the proposed improvements with
the existing improvements such as fences, landscaping and
irrigation systems, aboveground and underground facilities
including appurtenances. Verify, determine and coordinate all
poss~le relocations and obstructions of the existing facilities
with the adjacent property owners, City of Temecula, County of
Riverside, California Department of Transportation, General
Telephone, Southern California Gas Company, Inland Valley
Cablevision, Southern California Edison, Rancho C~lifornia
° Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation
° Background Research
Review available documents and reports pertaining to the
geotechnical conditions of the site and immediate vicinity.
Applicable information provided by government agencies
including the California Division of Mines and Geology and
United States Geologic Survey vail also be reviewed and
incorporated into our report.
F._~_mination and interpretation of stereoscopic aerial
photographs will be used to supplement our field geologic
mapping and identify potential geologic constraints including
unstable slopes, faulting~ and adverse bedding or fracture
patterns.
o Geologic Mapping
o Detailed geologic mapping of the proposed road alignment will
be performed to evaluate the existing geologic conditions in
relation to the proposed road improvements-
° Project Set-up
° Schedule field work for the project including setting up seisnn
surveys, dozer work, drffi rigs, and backhoe. Notify
Underground Alert and ff necessary meet on-site with the
various underground utility companies.
Rippability Investigation
Field -
Performance of two-way seismic traverses in the
areas of deep cuts for the proposed roadways in
order to determine rippability characteristic of the
underlying bedrock materials.
Office -
Calculate the thickness and seismic velocities in
feet/second for the varying layers of earth
materials underlying the subject site. Prepare a
graph detailing the thickness of individual layers,
estimated depth of the layer, velocity of the unit,
rippability characteristic, and thickness of
proposed cuts.
° Subsurface Exploration
° Subsurface exploration will be conducted along the proposed
road alignments to evaluate the existing soil conditions and
coilca in-situ and bulk soil samples for laboratory testing. The
objective of our subsurface exploration is to accurately define
critical s6il properties in regard to the proposed road
improvements. This may include moisture/density relationships,
hydro-consolidation, alluvial removals, and shear strength. Our
subsurface exploration will be conducted utilizing a truck
mounted drill rig or backhoe, depending upon field conditions
andproposed improvements. Subsurface exploration will include
excavation, logging, soil sampling and badefilling of borings and
trenches.
Pavement deflection testing or coring w~l be conducted in areas
of existing pavement to determine the structural integrity of the
existing section and design overlays where applicable.
Laboratory Testing
Laboratory testing w~l be conducted on representative soil
samples to determine the engineering parameters of the on-site
material. Laboratory testing will include, but is not limited to
the foilowing:
* Sieve Analysis * Mwrimum Density
* Direct Shear * Soft Qassification
* Sand Equivalent * R-Value
* Consolidation * In-situ
Moisture/Density
Engineering Analysis
Engineering analysis will be the evaluation of data collected
during the field investigation in relation to the proposed
improvements. The analysis will include, at a minimum,
pavement structural section design, evaluation of liquefaction
potential, discussion of seismicity and strong groundsbaking,
slope stability for large cut or fill slopes, and evaluation of soil
conditions relative to the proposed road improvements. We will
also evaluate the limited existing pavement and design overlays
where appropriate.
° Fault Anatpis & R~'~view
Review available reports and literature pertaining to the
location of the Elsinore Fault Zone (W~domar) in conjunction
with the proposed roadways. Utilize backhoe to confirm or
negate faults present within proposed roadway including
identifying potential hazards such as fault related springs, and ·
out of slope bedding of fault features.
Slope Stability Analysis
o To evaluate the stability of proposed cut/fill slopes constructed
to maximum design height, we will utilize a computer program
enti~ed PCSTABLS, created by Purdue University. This
program automatically searches for the potential arcuate failure
su~aces using Bishop's method of calculatiop-, considering site
specific soft parameters. The computer program automatically
searches for critical failure surface considering angle of internal
friction, cohesion intercept, wet density, and pore pressures,
where applicable.
Report Preparation
° A separate geotechnical report will be compiled for each of th~
road semnents. The report w~l provide a summaxy of our
findingsTconclusions, and recommendations for planning, design,
and construction of the proposed road improvements ~om the
geotechnical standpoint.
6. Task No. 4 Approach
ENGINEER will provide the following agency permit application
and processing services, excluding any environmental assessments:
Prepare and process an application for a Section 404
Nationwide Permit with the U.S. Army Corp of Engineers.
Prepare and process an application for a 1601/1603 Strenmbed
Alteration Agreement with the California Department of Fish
and Game.
Prepare and process a 401 Water Quality Certification or waiver
thereof with the Regional Water Quality Control Board.
° Prepare and process an encroachment permit from the
California Department of Transportation for the proposed work
within the State rights of way.
7. Task No. 5 Approach
° Final Street and Grading Plans
Based on the preliminary design, finalize the design in
preparation of the contract plans. If rcquircct, metric system
information wffi be incorporated in the contract plans per City
of Temecula standards.
Prepare Title and Index sheets to CITY approved standard and
formal
Prepare an ink mylar Street Improvement Plan and Profile
using 44)' horizontal and 4' vertical scalc~ The improvement
plans wffi show the screened aerial topography in the
background and all pertinent engineering information necessary
for the construction of the project.
Using the 443' scale Street Improvement Plans, show the
necessary slope grading and daylight lines necessary for the
construction of the project. Prepare offsite grading plans
necessary for drainage purposes.
Process and coordinate the street and grading plans for
approval to the City of Temecula.
Upon approval of the Street Improvement Plans, Grading Plans
and other pertinent plans, prepare a detailed Engineer's
estimate for roadway excavation, embavkTnent, overexcavation
'and re-compaction including shrinkage and bulking f~ctors,
roadway base come, A.C. pavement, A.C. dike, A.C. overlays,
demolition and re-construction of existing improvements,
landscaping and irrigation systems, rclocation of existing
aboveground and underground facilities and all other pertinent
items necessary for the construction bid documents.
° Final Storm Drain Plnns and Hydrology Analysis
Using the preliminary store drain plans, ~nsll-e the design in
preparation of the contract plans. Metric system information
will be incorporated in the contract plans per City of Temecula
standards.
Prepare and process Storm Drain plans using 40' horizontal and
a 4' vertical scale for approval to the city of Temecula or to the
appropriate agencies as required.
Provide a final Hydrology Study Report. Perform hydraulic
calculations and HEC-2 analysis to support the installation of
the proposed storm drain facilities and the bridge overcrossing.
Process and coordinate with City Staff and the appropriate
agencies for approval.
Upon approval of the Storm Drain Plans, prepare a detailed
Engineer's estimate for storm drain pipes, inlets and all
pertinent items necessary for the construction bid documents.
Storm Water Pollution and Prevention Plan
o Prepare and process a Notice of Intent to the State Ware
Resources Control Board.
Prepare and process an Erosion and Sediment Control Plan for
approval to the City of Temecula.
Upon approval of the plans, prepare a detailed Engineer's
estimate for all pertinent items necessary for the construction
bid documents.
Final Traffic Signal Plans
Attend meetings to discuss the signal design. One meeting ~
be held with the design team to verif~ the design criteria and
review the basic preliminary plan. One meeting will be with the
City of Temecttla Traffic Engineer to discuss plan check.
Submit one set of reproduc~le vellums to be reproduced as
necessary for each plan check to the City of Temecula. Upon
receipt of final approval from the CITY, one set of mylars will
be submitted for inclusion in the final construction document
package for the City of Tcmccula. Prepare a detailed
Engineer's Estimate for all pertinent items necessary for the
construction bid documents
° Final Signing and Striping Plans
Attend meetings to discuss the signing and striping design. One
meeting will be held with the design team to verify the design
criteria and review the basic preliminary plan. One meeting will
be with the City of Temecula Traffic Engineer to discuss plan
check.
Submit one set of reproduc~le vellums to be reproduced as
necessary for each plan check to the City of Tcmccula. Upon
receipt of final approval from the CITY, one set of mylars will
be submitted for inclusion in the final construction document
package for the City of Temecula. Prepare a detailed
Engineer's Estimate for all pertinent items necessary for the
construction bid documents.
Final Traffic Control and Detour Plans
Prepare and process Traffic Control and Detour Plans to City
of Tcmccula and the appropriate agencies as required.
Obtain all necessary encroachment permits as required for the
project.
Prepared detailed Engineer's Estimate for all pertinent items as
necessary for the construction bid documents.
Street Rights-of-way, Slope Easements, Drainage Easements, Legal
Descriptions and Letter of Agreements
Obtain lot book reports from a title company necessary for the
processing and recordation of the right-of-way and casements
plats.
Prepare and process the necessary Plats and Legal Descriptions
for street right-of-way purposes to the City of Tcmecula or the
appropriate agency as required.
Prepare and process the necc.ssary Easement Plats and Legal
Descriptions for slope purposes to the City of Tcmccula or the
appropriate agency as required for recordation.
° Prepare and process the necessary Easement Plats and Le~ ~
Descriptions for drainage purposes to the City of Temecula ~,
the appropriate agency as required for recordation.
° Prepare and coordinate the necessary Letters of Agreement for
permission to grade on private properties between the City of
Temecula and the affected property owners.
8. Task No. 6 Approach
Final Bridge Plans
0
Final bridge design and plans will be prepared in accordance
with all relevant Calm project development and bridge
design documents. Structure plans will be prepared using
Intergraph Microstation CAD software. Metric system
information will be incorporated in the plans as required by the
City of Temecula.
Industry standard computer programs w:dl be used to expedite
the design where appropriate. The bridge engineer has
maintained a complete Hbrary of Caltran's approved brid[/'~''''~
design software with metric capabilities.
Structural special provisions will be prepared using current
Caltrans Standard Special Provisions compiled, edited and
supplemented to suit this project-
The engineer's estimate Will be prepared by a detailed quantity
take-off of all the usual items of work on the structure.
Quantities arc independently checked and back-checked within
accepted tolerances. Partial pay, final pay and specialty items
will be identified.
The design and plans will be independenfiy checked and back-
checked in accordance with Caltran's requirements.
Upon approval of the bridge PS&E package, the resident
engineer's file will be submitted. This will include a four-scale
of the deck contours plot and the deck joint movement
calculation sheets.
° The bridge engineer will assist City staff With Contractor
inquiries and preparation of contract addencla during the
bidding period.
9. Task No. 7 Approach
Preparation of Construction Bid Documents
Compile all approved street improvement plans, grading plans,
bridge plans, signing & striping plans, storm drain plans, erosion and
sediment control plans and all other pertinent plans necessary for
construction of the proposed project.
Compile all recorded street right-of-way and easement documents,
letters of agreement, state and federal permits and all environmental
documents required for the construction of the proposed project.
° Prepare a list of contract items necessary for the contract
documents.
Incorporate the soils engineers report and recommendations into the
contract plans and specifications.
Prepare a schedule to determine the construction duration and
sequence of work required for the project.
Using the City of Temecula's boiler phte contract documents,
prepare a bid specification package to include bidders' instruction,
bid sheets, general specifications, special provisions and technical
specifications. Metric system information will be included in the
contract documents as required by the City of Temecula.
Coordinate the final bid package and specifications with City of
Temecula staff.
Review the construction bids and provide recommendations,
Coordinate with City of Temecula staff the results of the bidding
process.
Attend pre-construc~on meetings and provide response to all
questions or concerns that may arise during the construction stages.
10. Task No. 8 Approach
Prepare and proce~ Conditional Letter of Map Revision
Research and compile all available existing hydrologic and hydraulic
analysis, records and in_formations.
Provide now hydraulic (HEC-2) calculation and report for existing
conditions using the design FEMA Q100 provided by the CITY.
Prepare 100' scale exlu'bit to show existing topography, cross-sections
and the calculated floodplain limits.
Reflect the calculated floodplain limits on the current Flood
Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) and provide comparison results with
the floodplain limits as shown on the current FIRM.
Provide now hydraulic (I-IEC-2) calculation and report for proposed
conditions (with the proposed bridges along the Western Bypass and
First Street) using the design FEMA Q100 provided by the CITY.
Prepare 100' scale exln'bit to show proposed bridge locations, cross-
sections and the calculated floodplain limits. ~"
Reflect the calculated floodplain limits on the current FIRM and
provide comparison results with the ~oodplnin limits Of the existing
conditions.
Prepare the necessary forms and applications based upon the new
forms released on October 1992 by FEMA,
Coordinate with the appropriate agencies and process to FEMA for
the CLOMR approval.
Provide reponses to FEMA comments and coorcljnat~ the
appropriate agencies.
IV. 17
EXHIBIT "B"
PAYMENT SCHEDULE
r:%O27~jfdavids.agrlajp
Trsns-r c c
HOURLY RATE SCm~BUL~.
as of January 4, 1994
JOB CLASSIFICATION
Director/Principal Engineer
Senior Engineer
~soclatz Engineer
Kssistam Engineer
Principal Plsnner
Senior Planner
Associate Planner
Assistant Planner
Graphic Artist
Assistant Graphic Artist
Senior Designer
A~*te (CADD) Designer
Assistant Designer
Senior Delineator
Assistant Delineator
Messenger
Principal Surveyor
Survey / Two-Man Crew
Survey / Three-Man Crew
Senior Surveyor
Associate Surveyor'
Assistant Surveyor
Chief. of-Party
Instrument Man
Chninn~n
Survey Technician
Associate Computer Engineer
OTHER SERVICES & EXPENSES
Traveling
Blueprints
Mileage
Outside Services/Special Consultants
Expert Witness (4 hour minimum):
Court and Deposition
Preparation
HOURLY RATE
55.00
55.00
50.00
45.130
45.00
35.00
25.00
100.00
135.00
175.00
90.00
75.00
70.00
70.00
30.00
1.O0/sheet
35/m11¢
Cost +15%
200.00
150.00
27.i-i7 FjIterprise Circle West
Temecula, Ca 92590 lISA
Tel. (~)9) 676 -
Fax (909) 69-i -
NOTE: Payments are due 30 days from date of invoice. A late payment finance charge of 1.5% per month will be appHe ~
to any balances which are unpaid after 30 days.
Geotechnical & Environmental Engineers, Inc.
GEOTE4~INIG4L FEE SCHEDULE
EFFEO71VEJANUARY ~ge~
Sieve ~ (+~ or 4) ..........................................................
F%-a~aton Index ...............................................................
P, Vmlue ......................................................................
Sulfatm ......................................................................
Co. odvNy ....................................................................
Pe.,,~:-~x~ty failing or Constant Heed) ..............................................
CompmMion Temm - Concrm Cy#nden .............................................
~ Tatm . Hot Mix Amphm~ ...................................... ~ ............
Specmcemay-SolandAgamgmBMe .............................................
Stmbay mnd Air Void~ - H~ A~ AmphM ...............................................
Mix Dedgn - Hot Mix Asphelt mnd Concmte ............................................
$ esUnltPt~,
in coilecb~l any ddinquent mccount will be pmid by ere clienL
An ovw'Nme c~ d 33.3% d hourly rmt'd will be mdded for #me in ex~eB d S hourB Per daY (erJudtng aO ~ ~ ~
7..OO m.m. mnd elter S p. m. or an Seturdays. An ovefewe cl'4qle d SO~ wel be ~ for a~ne in ex~m d12 houm Pef dl~ mnd
27463 Enccrpt/sc Circle V~tcsc - Temccu/a · CA 92590 . TEL ( 909 ) 676. 8337 · FAX ( 909 ) 676. 4583
MAR
BRIDGE .DRAFTSPERSON.....; .....,...:...: ...............: ......; ................,,, ......:...: ......$55.00
'Hourly. charges lndude,provi~.'on'fo.~'.norrnal. ob ove~eed ~sts, sud; as .c~me rental,. ubTbS,
· insurance, cleficel'~ewices, equipment,:normal supplies. and mabrial, tn-h, ouse reproductbn
':serves end'!oce/ tiavel c~fS, . 'C~her eXper~es such .as spee. ial consubn~s or.purches'eri. ou~side
." services will be b///ed,-at 'c~t plus :10 percent. ..... .
· .....:. ,.,. . ..., . , ,. .. ',
,. ,. ,.
..., ,'; ":. '.':
,...:+ , · ..+. ,+ .... . .
':." , ·
Z5 '595 ]0:33
PAGE.002
FEE 5{:H=DUL[: o HOURLY E'hl l IN(,; RA rb.S AND i-hi I ~r,;G GRAD[--
Grade
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
A
B
C
D
E
F
Rate I O.T.
$50
$55
$60
$65
$70
$75
$80
$85
$95
$100
$105
$110
$115
$120
$125
$130
$135
$140
$35 / $52.50
$40 1 $60
$45 / $67.50
$50 / $75
$55
$60
ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS
DescdpUon
Engineering/Planning Analyst
Associate Engineer/Planner
EngineeriRanner
EngineedPlanner
Engineer/planner
Engineer/Planner, Project Engineer/planner
Project Engineer/Planner :
Project Engineer/Planner
Senior Engineer/Planner, Project Manager
Senior Engineer/Planner, Project Manager
Senior Engineer/Planner, Project Manager
Senior Engineer/Planner, Project Manager
Senior Project Manager, Senior Engineer/Planner
Senior Project manager, Senior Engineer/Planner
Senior Project Manager, Senior Engineer/Planner
Deputy Office Manager, Senior Project Manager
Branch Manager. Chief Engineer, Department Manager
Regional Manager, Corporate Vice President
President. Regional Manager
TECHNICIANS AND SUPPORT STAFF
Jr. Drafter/Technician, Clerk/Analyst
Drafterrrechnician. Clerk/Analyst
Drafter/Technician, Production Coordinator, Word Processor
CAD Drafter, Engineering Technician, Administrator,
Supervisor
CAD Drafter, Engineering Technician, Administrator,
Supervisor
Senior CAD/Graphics DraftedDesigner, Controller
MAR 15 '95 9:59 909 884 2~77 PAGE.00~
FbJz 5c;H[-.i]UI_E - H~jUF-H Y BiII ~NC, RAI FS ANU [3~1 ~ ING GRADF DFSCf,:LP T;ON5
H $70
I $75
l Senior CAD/Graphics Drafter/Designer, Controller
TECHNICIANS AND SUPPORT STAFF (CONlaD)
Senior CAD/Graphics DraWer/Designer
Senior CAD/Graphics DraftedDesigner
Grade descriptions and classifications subject to change (Effective 02/01/93).
Per $12
Hour
Computer I CADD Time
Project expenses will be billed at cost plus 10 percent for service and handling. Project
expenses include project-related costs such as transportation, mileage {~ $.30 per mile,
subsistence, reproduction, and subcontractor services. Each project may be ~ubject to initial
set up and coordination fees. Invoices are due and payable within 30 days after being sent.
Rates am subject to change (Effective 04/01/94).
PoSt-it-* Fax Note
To ('i,,.,,.,,,.,/
F~x #
7671
MAR 15 ' 95 9: 58 909 884 227? PAGE. 881
ITEM 5
Msrch 20, 1995
Mr. W.A. Caldwell
As stated in the MOU, the City/ASm~ will coolx~atc with T.Z.B.G., Inc.
in their eftore m oblsin finsnt~.g and to tensrosa the project. Please be
assured that we will use our best eftotis ~o provide Fluor Daniel with the
;~-~is~,nnce and infotrp~dan they may requixe to perform due diligence on the
proj~*t alld to ~ out their l~porlsibi]iti~ with ~ to finsn~ng and
We look forward to a positive working relatiop-~hip with T.Z.B.G., Inc. and
Fluor Daniel, Inc. on this e~clting projea.
Sincerely,
Ro d Snd
City Mzns~er ~
APPROVAl ER~
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFI F(
CITY MANAG
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Council/Redevelopment Agency
Ronald E. Bradley, Executive Director
March 28, 1995
Informational Report
T.Z.B.G., Inc. and Fluor Daniel, Inc.
RECOMMENDATION:
Receive and file.
BACKGROUND:
On February 28, 1995,T.Z.B.G., Inc. entered into a Memorandum of Understanding with Fluor
Daniel Inc. in order to obtain assistance in financing and construction of the proposed Old
Town Entertainment Project.
Fluor Daniel, Inc. is a highly experienced and successful construction management firm which
we are delighted to learn will be working with T.Z.B.G. on this important ~oject.
Attached for your review is a copy of correspondence sent to Fluor Daniel, Inc. which
describes the City/Agency obligations under the Memorandum of Understanding with T.Z.B. G.,
Inc., and indicates our intention to cooperate fully during the due diligence process that will
be undertaken between Fluor and T.Z.B.G.
Jeffrey E. Stone
Ma}g)r
Karel F. Unclemans
Ma~jor Pro Tern
J. Sal Mu~oz
Councilmember
W.A. Caldwen
Fluor Daniel, Inc.
100 Fluor Daniel Drive
Greenville, SC 296(Y7-2762
Ronald J. Parks
Counc|lmember
Ronald H. Robercs
Councilmember
{909) 6946444
FAX 1909) 694-1999
We are delighte~ to hear that Fluor Daniel will be assisting T.Z.B.G., Inc.
with the ~n.nclng and construction of the Entea~ninment Project proposed to
be constructed in Old Town Temeaxla.
The City of Temecula and its Redevelopment Agency have committed to
assist T.Z.B.G., Inc. with the pwject in the manner described in the attached
Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) executed by T.Z.B.G., Inc. and the
City/Agency on January 31, 1995.
Generally, the MOU pwvides that the City and Agency will be responsible
for financing an estimated $11.6 million of public improvements to support
the Enter~inment Project. Public improvement costs will be financed by tax
increment, assessment district and general fund revenue sources. It is our
hten~on, subject to the required selection procedure that public agencies
must follow, to request that T.Z.B.G., Inc. and a construction management
firm take responsibility for the conslzuc~on of these public improvements in
order to achieve cost efficiencles and assure coordination between
construction projects.
The City/Agency has also agreed to assist T.Z.B.G., Inc. with the financing
of the entertainment facilities through the use of conduit financing. The
conditions under which conduit financing would be considered require that
no existing revenue of the City or the Agency nor the full faith and credit of
the City or the Agency would be obligated or pledged for the payment of
fln~ncing for the entertniqment facilities. However, the City has agreed to
consider the use of new revenues generated specifically by the Enter~inrnent
Project including sales tax, transient occupancy taxes and a "ticket tax" paid
by visitors to the project. The public revenues, if any, that would be applied
to debt service payments will be limited to revenues specifically generated by
the Entertahment Project.