HomeMy WebLinkAbout071801 PC Agenda ce;~,wjth ,the Amencans w~th D~sabd~t~es Act, if you need speoal assistance to participle ~n th~s /
~~~~a~b~e..o..ffice~f.the City Clerk (909) 694-644d. Notification 48 houm pdor toa meeting will
~~(~nable. arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [2_8 _CFR
'!'E M EC~N. rNING COMMISSION
- - ~'*~ ~C~TY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
43200, BUSINESS PARK DRIVE
· ~ JULY 18, 200t - 6:00 P.M.
: .Next in Order:
-.Flag Salutb. - - Comm~ss~one'r.Ch~maeff
?_.;~i~.~.?A~t~ta'l Of.~15:mi~uteS~:iS provided so members of the public may address the Commission
about an item no~t on the Agenda, a pink
i should be filled out and filed with the Commission Secretary.
:to speak; please come forward and state your name for the record.
items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the
addressing that item, There is a three
~dividual speakers,
~nder Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will
no discussion of these items unless
a;nni~g .Commission request specific items be removed from the
~ action.
:21'.~A~pr~.v_.~th~:Agenda of July 18, 2001'
~-Mi~bt~'s-' '~" ' -
'RECOMMENDATION:
2.t 5~p~rovetho Minute~ of Oune 6. 2001
~ .doe
COMMISSION BUSINESS
3 Appointment of a new Chair and Co-Chair
PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before a public
hearing or may appear and be heard iL support of or in opposition to the approval of
the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you
may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public
hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the Commission Secretary at, or
prior to, the public hearing.
4 Plannin.q Application No. 01-0082 (Conditional Use PermitJDevelopment Plan) - Mission
Oaks National Bank
Michael McCoy, Project Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Adopt a Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No, PA01-0082 based on the
Determination of Consistency with a project for which a Negative Declaration was
previously adopted;
4.2 Adopt a resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2001-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. PA01-0082 (DEVELOPMENT PLAN) TO CONSTRUCT AND
OPERATE A 2,200 SQUARE FOOT BANK BUILDING WITHOUT
A DRIVE-THROUGH LANE ON A 0.17-ACRE PAD SITE
LOCATED WITHIN THE EXISTING VAIL RANCH CENTER
COMMERCIAL CENTER ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF HIGHWAY
79 SOUTH AND REDHAWK PARKWAY KNOWN AS
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 961-080-004.
4.3 and Adopt a Resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2001-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA DENYING PLANNING APPLICATION NO.
PA01-0082 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT), TO CONSTRUCT
AN ATM DRIVE-THROUGH IN CONJUNCTION WITH A 2,200
SQ. FT. BANK ON A 0.17-ACRE PAD SITE LOCATED WITHIN
THE EXISTING VAIL RANCH CENTER COMMERCIAL CENTER
ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH AND
REDHAWK PARKWAY KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL
NO. 961-080-004.
R:~PLANCOMM~Agendas~2001 \7-18-01 .doc 2
(Development Plan)
anner
)lication No. 00-0397 (Development Plan)
a proJect for which an Environmental
~3ursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section
~.El~,'s and Negative Declarations·
PC REBeL.U. TIoN NO. 2001-
COMMISSION OF THE
~;'PLANNING APPLICATION
:, A-DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE DESIGN,
· O'IE:~ FOUR OFFICE BUILDINGS
AND THREE FUTURE
~BLE OF ACCOMMODATING AN
BUILDING, UP TO A 7,500
RESTAU·~ANT, AND A THREE STORY 84-
L OR 13,868 S.Q~ARE FOOT OFFICE BUILDING,
;I~EON THE NORTHWEST CORNER
ID-DRIVE ANI~MARGARITA ROAD, WITHIN THE
KNOWN AS LOTS B &
ENT' NO. PA99-0424, ASSESSOR'S
P_AR(~E~E~I~O's.'ApE 92'1 ~8~0~ 2 AND 921-810-017.
t'~S REPORTS
August 1, 2001~Council Chambers, 43200 Business Pa~ Drive
ITEM #2
MINUTES FOR JUNE 6, 2001
WILL BE DISTRIBUTED UNDER SEPARATE COVER
ITEM #3
APPOINTMENT OF NEW CHAIR
AND
CO-CHAIR
ITEM #4
STAFF REPORT- PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
July 18, 2001
Planning Application No. PA01-0082 (Conditional Use PermitJDevelopment Plan) -
Mission Oaks National Bank
Prepared By: Michael McCoy, Project Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
The Community Development Department - Planning Division Staff
recommends the Planning Commission:
ADOPT a Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. PA01-0082 based on the
Determination of Consistency with a project for which a Negative Declaration was
previously adopted;
2. ADOPT a Resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2001-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA01-0082
(DEVELOPMENT PLAN) TO CONSTRUCT AND OPERATE A 2,200
SQUARE FOOT BANK BUILDING WITHOUT A DRIVE-THROUGH LANE
ON A 0.17-ACRE PAD SITE LOCATED WITHIN THE EXISTING VAIL
RANCH CENTER COMMERCIAL CENTER ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF
HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH AND REDHAWK PARIONAY KNOWN AS
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 961-080-004.
3. and ADOPT a Resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2001-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA DENYING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA01-0082
(CONDmONAL USE PERMIT), TO CONSTRUCT AN ATM DRIVE-
THROUGH IN CONJUNCTION WITH A 2,200 SQ. FT. BANK ON A 0.17-
ACRE PAD SITE LOCATED WITHIN THE EXISTING VAIL RANCH CENTER
COMMERCIAL CENTER ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH
AND REDHAWK PARIONAY KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 961-
080-004.
R:~D P~2001'~PA01-O082 Mission Oaks NatJ. Bank~FINAL PC STAFFRPT.doc
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
Mission Oaks National Bank c/o Keith Johnson
REPRESENTATIVE: Davidson + Allen Architects c/o Dean Davidson
PROPOSAL:
Conditional Use Permit/Development Plan application to design, construct
and operate a 2,200 square foot bank building with a 600 square foot canopy
and drive-through facility.
LOCATION:
Highway 79 South and Redhawk Parkway on building pad 7 of Parcel 4 of
PM 28508.
EXISTING ZONING: CC (Community Commercial)
SURROUNDING ZONING:
North: HTC (Highway/Tourist Commercial), PO (Professional Office)
and SP-4
South: OS-C (Conservation)
East: Unincorporated Area
West: M (Medium Density Residential)
PROPOSEDZONING: CC
GENERAL PLAN
DESIGNATION: CC
EXISTING LAND USE: Vacant Pad
SURROUNDING LAND USES:
North: Highway/Tourist Commercial,
Community Commercial
South: Open Space
East: Highway/Tourist Commercial
West: Medium Density Residential
Professional Office and
PROJECT STATISTICS
Site Area: 7,431 square feet (0.16 net acres)
10,771 square feet (0.24 gross acres)
Building Area: 2,200 square feet plus a 600 square foot canopy
Lot Coverage/FAR: 2,850 square feet (0.26 Floor Area Ratio)
Target Floor Area Ratio: 0.30
Parking required under
the existing reciprocal
parking agreement: 7 spaces + 1 handicapped space
R:'~D P~20Ol~PAOl-O082 Mission Oaks Natl. BanI(~FINAL PC STAFFRPT,doc
2
BACKGROUND
The proposed project was initially reviewed at the March 15, 2001 Development Review Committee
(DRC) meeting, to which a DRC comments letter was sent to the applicant on March 19, 2001 .The
applicant returned revised plans on June 7, 2001 and the project was deemed complete on June 21,
2001.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed project is a combined Conditional Use Permit and Development Plan application,
for construction and operation of a 2,200 square foot commercial bank building to include a 600
square foot driveway canopy and an ATM drive-through lane on a 0.17 acre vacant building pad
within the Vail Ranch Center shopping center. A Conditional Use Permit (CUP) approval is required
for the drive-through facility pursuant to Section 17.08.050(M) of the Development Code, which
requires CUP approval for all development projects with drive-through facilities. A Development Plan
application approval is required for the new bank building.
drive~through.
ANALYSIS
S te Desiqn
The site is situated on a vacant 7,400 square foot turfed rectangular building pad within the existing
Vail Ranch shopping center. The building is evenly centered towards the front section of the building
pad. A paved plaza area takes up a large part of the west side of the building. A 12-foot wide ATM
drive-through lane is proposed along the south side of the building and exits out into the interior
drive lane of the shopping center.
Drive-throuqh (Conditional Use Permit)
The project site is designated as a Village Center Overlay in the General Plan land use element.
The Village Center Overlay areas are conceptual boundaries to help provide a sense of place and
focal areas for community activity and encourage non-automotive modes of transportation
(reference Land Use Plan Section IV B).
The approved Vail Ranch Center Design Guidelines conform with this General Plan designation by
describing the Vail Ranch Center as "a community commercial shopping center based upon a
village center concept that is sensitive to the needs of the pedestrian". In addition, the approved
Master Site Plan for the Vail Ranch Center has identified the proposed project site as part of a
pedestrian plaza area and shows the building without a drive-through. A drive-through facility at this
location within the Vail Ranch Center would be contrary to the objectives and intent of the General
Plan Village Center Overlay and Vail Ranch Center Design Guidelines and approved Master Site
Plan. Therefore, staff recommends denial of the proposed project unless the applicant eliminates
the drive-through and revises the plans accordingly.
Architecture Desiqn
The building design is a southwestern Mediterranean style consistent with the existing buildings in
the Vail Ranch Center. The north facing elevation features a forward set arched glass storefront
entrance supported by vertical concrete columns on each side. A wood trellis element with plaster
R:'~D P~2.001~PA01-0082 Mission Oaks Natl. Bank'FINAL PC STAFFRPT.doc
3
columns extends along the west side of the building above the walk-up ATM area. Several
aluminum-framed vertical storefmnt windows with dual colored ceramic tile designs at the base are
placed along each side of the building. The building's varied roof height features a cornice element
that caps the top of each parapet wall. The building design is consistent with the City's Commercial
Design Guidelines and the Vail Ranch Center Design Guidelines.
Landscapin,q
The project site provides approximately 21% on-site landscape coverage. The drive-through lane
and drive-up ATM facility is buffered by a landscaped strip that provides a variety of trees, shrubs
and groundcover, which includes 24-inch box size Carrotwood and 36-inch box size Bottle trees.
The north facing side of the building has a landscape planter with shrubbery, 24-inch size India
Hawthorn trees, and potted plants that front the building entrance. The wood trellis along the west-
facing wall will feature Star Jasmine that will attach to the vertical trellis columns. A landscaped
plaza area with trees, turf, shrubs, and two benches helps to implement the pedestrian plaza
amenity that is identified on the approved master site plan for this location of the Vail Ranch Center.
If the drive-through lane is eliminated, additional landscaping around the building will be possible.
GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING CONSISTENCY
The Community Commercial General Plan land use designation views service-oriented business
activities, such as banks and financial institutions, as an appropriate land use. However, the
proposed project with a drive-through facility is not consistent with the objectives and intent of the
General Plan Village Center Overlay land use designation. The (CC) Community Commercial zoning
designation lists banks and financial institutions providing drive-through facilities as a conditionally
permitted use requiring an approved Conditional Use Permit under Section 17.08.050 of the
Development Code. The proposed project as conditioned is consistent with the policies contained in
the General Plan and with the requirements of the Development Code and City Design Guidelines.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
The proposed project is exempt from CEQA review based on the Determination of Consistency with
a previous project for which a Negative Declaration was previously adopted.
SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS
Staff recommends denial of the proposed project unless the applicant eliminates the drive-through
facility and the site plan is revised without a drive-through as set forth in the attachment.
FINDINGS (Development Plan)
The proposed use is consistent with the land use designation and policies for Community
Commercial (CC) development in the City of Temecula General Plan, as well as the
development standards for the Community Commercial (CC) zoning district contained in the
City's Development Code. The Development Plan application as conditioned is consistent
with other applicable requirements of State Law and local ordinance, including the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City-wide Design Guidelines, and all fire and building
R;~D 1:~2001~PA01-0082 Mission Oaks Nail, Bank~FINAL PC STAFFRPT.doc
4
codes. The proposed development plan project without a drive-through lane is consistent
with the objectives and applicable provisions of the development code, and the purpose of
the zoning district in which the site is located.
The overall development of the land will not advemely impact the public health, safety and
general welfare of the community. The Conditional Use Permit/Development Plan for the
project has been reviewed by City Departments and outside agencies whose responsibility it
is to ensure protection. All aspects of construction will be inspected by the City for
compliance with applicable Building Codes. The proposed development plan project without
a drive-through lane is consistent with the general plan.
The design of the proposed improvements is not likely to cause substantial environmental
damage or substantially and unavoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. There are no
known fish, wildlife or habitat on the project site, and the project will not affect any fish,
wildlife or habitat off-site. The site is surrounded by development and is an infill site. The
project will not individually or cumulatively have an adverse effect on wildlife resources, as
defined in Section 711.2 of the Fish and Game Code.
FINDINGS (Conditional Use Permit)
The proposed drive-through is not consistent with the objectives and intent of the General
Plan Land Use Element Village Oveday designation, nor the Vail Ranch Center Design
Guidelines for pedestdan-odented development.
The proposed conditional use is not compatible with the nature, condition and development
of adjacent uses and building. Since the Vail Ranch Center Design Guidelines have
designated this location as a pedestrian p!~7~, the proposed drive-through lane would not be
compatible with the pedestrian-oriented nature planned for this particular location of the
commercial center.
The site fora proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the
parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other development features
prescribed in this development code and required by the planning commission or council in
order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood.
The nature of the proposed conditional use is detrimental to the health, safety and general
welfare of the community. The drive-through lane will introduce vehicles in an area
envisioned to be for pedestrian flow. This will create an undesirable mixing of vehicles and
pedestrians, which is inconsistent with the original master plan for the shopping center.
o
That the decision to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application for a conditional
use permit be based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the
planning commission or city council on appeal. Due to the fact that the proposed drive-
through lane is inconsistent with the objectives and intent of the Village Center Overlay in the
General Plan land use element and the Vail Ranch Center Design Guidelines, the decision
to deny the application for a conditional use permit is clearly based on a view of the record
as a whole and the established City Ordinance and approved design guidelines.
R:~D P~2001~PA01-0082 Mission Oaks Natl. Bank~FINAL PC STAFFRPT.doc
5
Attachments:
2.
3.
4.
PC Resolution of Development Plan Approval- Blue Page 7
Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 10
PC Resolution of Conditional Use Permit Denial - Blue Page 20
Exhibits - Blue Page 23
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
h.
I.
J.
K.
L.
Vicinity Map
Zoning Map
General Plan Maps
Site Plan P.1
Site Plan P.2
Elevation detail
Landscape Plan
Floor Plan
General Plan Land Use Element Village Center Overlay policy section
Applicant Letter of Justification for drive-through facility
Letter from Rancho Water District dated March 6, 2001
Letter from Riverside County Flood Control District dated March 4, 2001
R:~D P~2001~PA01-O082 Mission Oaks Natl. Bank~FINAL PC STAFFRPT.doc
6
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2001-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA01-0082
(DEVELOPMENT PLAN) TO CONSTRUCT AND OPERATE A 2,200
SQUARE FOOT BANK BUILDING WITHOUT A DRIVE-THROUGH LANE
ON A 0.17-ACRE PAD SITE LOCATED WITHIN THE EXISTING VAIL
RANCH CENTER COMMERCIAL CENTER ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF
HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH AND REDHAWK PARKWAY KNOWN AS
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 961-080-004.
WHEREAS, Mr. Keith Johnson filed Planning Application No. 01-0082 (the "Application") in a
manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code;
WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PA01-0082 was processed including, but not limited
to public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered Planning
Application No. PA01-0082 on July 18, 2001, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law,
at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did, testify either in
support or opposition to this matter;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearings and after due consideration of the
testimony, the Commission approved the Development Plan for a 2,200 square foot bank building
without a drive-through subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder;
WHEREAS, all legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES
RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1.
by reference.
That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated
Section 2 Findinqs. That the Planning Commission, in approving the Development Plan
application hereby adopts the following findings as required in Section 17.05.010 of the Temecula
Municipal Code:
A. The proposed use is consistent with the land use designation and policies for Community
Commercial (CC) development in the City of Temecula General Plan, as well as the development
standards for the Community Commercial (CC) zoning district contained in the City's Development
Code. The Development Plan application as conditioned is consistent with other applicable
requirements of State Law and local ordinance, including the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA), the City-wide Design Guidelines, and all fire and building codes.
B. The overall development of the land will not adversely impact the public health, safety and
general welfare of the community. The Conditional Use Permit/Development Plan for the project has
been reviewed by City Departments and outside agencies whose responsibility it is to ensure
protection. All aspects of construction will be inspected by the City for compliance with applicable
Building Codes.
R:~D FA2001~PA01-0082 Mission Oaks Natl. Bank~FINAL PC STAFFRPT.doc
8
C. The design of the proposed improvements is not likely to cause substantial environmental
damage or substantially and unavoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. There are no known
fish, wildlife or habitat on the project site, and the project will not affect any fish, wildlife or habitat off-
site. The site is surrounded by development and is an infill site. The project will not individually or
cumulatively have an adverse effect on wildlife resoumes, as defined in Section 711.2 of the Fish
and Game Code.
Section 3. Environmental Compliance. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula
has determined that the Development Plan application qualifies for a Notice of Exemption based on
the Determination of Consistency with a project for which a Negative Declaration was previously
adopted.
Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula hereby
conditionally approves the Application for all of the foregoing reasons and subject to the project
specific conditions set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference
together with any and all other necessary conditions that may be deemed necessary.
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning
Commission this eighteenth day July 2001.
Ron Guerriero, Chairman
ATTEST:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTYOF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Debbie U bnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that
PC Resolution No. 01 - was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City
of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the eighteenth day of July, 2001, by the following
vote:
AYES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
NOES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
R:~D P~2.001~PA01-0082 Miss[on Oaks Nat~. Bank,FINAL PC STAFFRPT.doc
9
::rEXHIBIT A
~- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OFAPPROVAL
Planning Application No. PA01-0082 (Development Plan - Mission Oaks Bank)
Project Description:
A proposal to build a 2,200 square foot bank without an ATM
drive-through lane on a 0.17-acre vacant building pad, located
on Highway 79 South and Redhawk Parkway at the Vail Ranch
Commercial Center.
Development Impact Fee Category: Community Commercial
Assessor's Parcel No.:
Approval Date:
Expiration Date:
961-080-004
July 18, 2001
July 18, 2003
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project
The applicant shall deliver to the Community Development Department - Planning Division a
cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Seventy-
Eight Dollars ($78.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice
of Exemption as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21108(b) and California
Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said forfy-eight (48) hour period the applicant
has not delivered to the Community Development Department - Planning Division the check
as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of
condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c).
General Requirements
The permit'tee/applicant shall indemnify, defend with counsel of Ci~s own election, and hold
harmless, the City and any agency or instrumentality thereof, and/or any of its officers,
employees, and agents from any and all claims, actions, or proceedings against the City, or
any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its officers, employees, and agents, to
attack, set aside, void, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting from an approval of the
City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative
body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning
Application which action is brought within the appropriate statute of limitations period and
Public Resources Code, Division 13, Chapter 4 (Section 21000 et seq., including but not by
the way of limitations Section 21152 and 21167). The City shall promptly notify the
permittee/applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding brought forth within this time period.
The City shall estimate the cost of the defense of the action and applicant shall deposit said
amount with the City. City may require additional deposits to cover anticipated costs. City
shall refund, without interest, any unused portions of the deposit once the litigation is finally
concluded. Should the City fail to either promptly notify or cooperate fully, permittee/
applicant shall not, thereafter be responsible to indemnify, defend, protect, or hold harmless
the City, any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its officers, employees, or agents.
R:~D P~2001~PA01-0082 Mission Oaks Nail. Bank~FINAL PC STAFFRPT,doc
The applicant shall comply with all conditions of approval for Planning Application No. PA01 -
0082, unless superseded by these conditions of approval. All these conditions shall be
complied with prior to any occupancy or use allowed by this conditional use permit.
This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall
become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction
contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year pedod, which is thereafter diligently
pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this
approval.
The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibit "D"
(Site Plan), contained on file with the Community Development Department - Planning
Division.
All ground mounted utility/mechanical equipment shall not be placed in prominent locations
visible to the public. This equipment shall be screened from view.
Landscaping shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibit "1" (Landscape Plan).
Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable
satisfaction of the Planning Manager. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being
maintained, the Planning Manager shall have the authority to require the property owner to
bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued
maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any
successors in interest.
Building elevations shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibit "F" (Building
Elevations) approved with Planning Application No. 01-0082, contained on file with the
Community Development Department - Planning Division.
a. All utilities, mechanical and roof-mounted equipment shall be hidden by building
elements that were designed for that purpose as an integral part of the building.
When determined to be necessary by the Planning Manager the parapet will be
raised to provide for this screening.
b. All downspouts shall be internalized within the building design.
The colors and materials used for this commercial building shall conform substantially to the
approved color and matedal board, or as amended by these conditions.
Material Color
Extedor Plaster wall Sherwin Williams #2192 "Coconut Grove"
Doors, pilasters and base trim Sherwin Williams #2184 "Deer Valley"
Trellis and cornice element Sherwin Williams #2293 "Bryce Rose"
Ceramic tile element Ceramica Vogue Products #30 Sandstone "Beige & Marrone"
Storefront - Windows Clear Glazing
Door and window frames Kawneer #40"Anodized Class I Dark Bronze"
Prior to the Issuance of Grading Permits
10. The applicant shall submit to the Planning Department for permanent filing two (2) 8" X 10"
glossy photographic color prints each of the Color and Materials Board and the colored
architectural Elevations. All labels on the Color and Materials Board and Elevations shall be
readable on the photographic prints.
11. The applicant shall comply with the previsions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal
R:",D P~2001'~PA01-0082 Mission Oaks Na~. Bank",FINAL PC STAFFRPT.dOC
12
12.
Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that ordinance or by
providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid.
The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be provided
by the Community Development Department - Planning Division staff, and retum one signed
set to the Community Development Department - Planning Division for their files.
Prior to
13.
14.
the Issuance of Building Permits
A Consistency Check fee shall be paid per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule.
Three (3) copies of detailed Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be
submitted to the Planning Department for review approval. The location, number, genus,
species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. These plans shall be consistent
with the Water Efficient Ordinance and conform substantially to the approved Conceptual
Landscape Plan (Exhibit I) or as amended by these conditions. The cover page shall
identify the total square footage of the landscaped area for the site. The plans shall be
accompanied by the following items:
a. Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal).
b. One (1) copy of the approved grading plan.
c. Water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water
Efficient Ordinance).
d. Total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with the approved
plan).
Prior to the Issuance of Occupancy Permits
15. Separate building permit applications for the installation of signage shall be submitted in
conformance with City Ordinances, Design Guidelines, and Development Code.
16. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed and be in a condition
acceptable to the Director of Planning. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds,
disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working
order.
17. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Planning, to
guarantee the maintenance of the plantings, in accordance with the approved construction
landscape and irrigation plans, shall be filed with the Community Development Department-
Planning Division for one year from final certificate of occupancy. After that year, if the
landscaping and irrigation system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the
Planning Manager, the bond shall be released.
18. Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently
affixed reflectodzed sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying
the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square
inches in area and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space at a minimum
height if 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space finished grade, or
centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space finished grade, ground,
or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each entrance to the off-
street parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches, clearly and conspicuously stating
the following:
"Unauthorized vehicles parked in designated accessible spaces not
displaying distinguishing placards or license plates issued for
R:~D P~2001~PA01-0082 Mission Oaks Nail. Bank~FINAL PC STAFFRPT.doc
13
persons with disabilities may be towed away at owner's expense.
Towed vehicles may be reclaimed by telephoning 909 696-3000."
In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall have a surface
identification sign duplicating the Symbol of Accessibility in blue paint of at least 3 square feet in
size.
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
19. Unless otherwise noted, ail conditions shall be completed by the Developer at no cost to any
Government Agency. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the site plan all
existing and proposed property lines, easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints
and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for
further review and revision.
General Requirements
20. A Grading Permit for either rough and/or precise grading, including all on-site flat work and
improvements, shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained street right-of-way.
21. All improvement plans and grading plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent
projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on
standard 24' x 36" City of Temecula mylars.
Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit
22. A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed and
approved by the Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include all necessary
erosion control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and private property.
23. The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and
erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to
approval by the Department of Public Works.
24. A Soil Report shall be prepared by a registered Soil or Civil Engineer and submitted to the
Director of the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report
shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the
construction of engineered structures and pavement sections.
25. A Geological Report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted to
the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address
special study zones and the geological conditions of the site, and shall provide
recommendations to mitigate the impact of ground shaking and liquefaction.
26. The Developer shall have a Drainage Study prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in
accordance with City Standards identifying storm water runoff expected from this site and
upstream of this site. The study shall identify all existing or proposed public or private
drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. The study shall also analyze and identify
impacts to downstream properties and provide specific recommendations to protect the
properties and mitigate any impacts. Any upgrading or upsizing of downstream facilities,
including acquisition of drainage or access easements necessary to make required
improvements, shall be provided by the Developer.
27. The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No
grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or the
R:~) P~2001'~PA01-0082 Mission Oaks Natt. Bank~FINAL PC STAFFRPT.doc
14
project is shown to be exempt.
28. As deemed necessary by the Director of the Department of Public Works, the Developer
shall receive written clearance from the following agencies:
a. San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board
b. Rivemide County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
c, Planning Department
d. Department of Public Works
29. The Developer shall comply with all constraints, which may be shown upon an
Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the
subject property.
30. Permanent landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department
and the Department of Public Works for review and approval,
31. The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or slope easements for off-site
work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public Works.
Prior to Issuance of a Building Permit
32. Improvement plans and/or precise grading plans shall conform to applicable City of
Temecula Standards subject to approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works.
The following design cdteria shall be observed:
a. Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over A.C.
paving.
b. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula Standard No. 207A.
c. Streetlights shall be installed along the public streets adjoining the site in accordance
with City Standard No. 800, 801,802 and 803.
d. Concrete sidewalks and ramps shall be constructed along public street frontages in
accordance with City of Temecula Standard Nos. 400. 401and 402.
e. All street and ddveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees.
f. All concentrated drainage directed towards the public street shall be conveyed
through undersidewalk drains.
The Developer shall construct the following public improvements in conformance with
applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Director of the Department of
Public Works.
a. Street improvements, which may include, but not limited to: pavement, curb and
gutter, medians, sidewalks, ddve approaches, street lights, signing, striping, traffic
signal systems, and other traffic control devices as appropriate
b. Storm drain facilities
c. Sewer and domestic water systems
d. Under grounding of proposed utility distribution lines
The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance with
the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered Civil Engineer, and the Soil Engineer
shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions,
33.
R:'~D P~OO1'~PA01-O082 Mission Oaks Natl. Bank~FINAL PC STAFFRPT.doc
15
35. The Developer shall obtain/grant an easement for ingress and egress over the adjacent
property.
36. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as
required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all
Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06.
Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy
37. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
a. Rancho California Water Distdct
b. Eastern Municipal Water District
c. Department of Public Works
38. All public improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and
City standards to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works.
39. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall
be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of
Public Works.
BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT
40. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 1998 edition of the
California Building, Plumbing, Mechanical and Fire Codes; 1998 National Electrical Code;
California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy and Disabled Access Regulations and the
Temecuia Municipal Code.
41. Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plan showing compliance with
Palomar Lighting Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All streetlights and
other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of
Building and Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine
directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way.
42. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction
work.
A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector pdor to commencement of
any construction or inspections.
Disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the buildings is required. The
path of travel shall meet the California Disabled Access Regulations in terms of cross slope,
travel slope, stripping and signage. Provide all details on plans. (California Disabled
Access Regulations effective April 1,1998). Provide precise grading plan for plan check
submittal to check for handicap accessibility
45.
All buildings shall comply with the applicable provisions of the California Disabled Access
Regulations effective April 1, 1998. Provide the proper number of disabled parking
spaces located as close as possible to the main entries in accordance with California
building Code Table 11B-6. Provide a site plan as requested above which indicates
compliance with this.
R:~3 P'~2001~PA01 -O082 Mission Oaks Nail. Bank~I=INAL PC STAFFRPT.doc
16
46.
47.
48.
49.
50.
51.
52.
53.
Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans and
structural calculations submitted for plan review.
Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule for plan review.
Provide house-electrical meters at each building for the purpose of providing power for fire
alarm systems and exterior lighting.
Schematic plumbing plans, electrical plan and load calculations, along with mechanical
equipment and ducting plans shall be submitted for plan review stamped and original signed
by an appropriate registered professional.
Obtain street addresses from the Building Official prior to submittal of plans for plan review.
Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrant to the project that indicates the hours
of construction, shown below, as allowed by City of Temecula Ordinance No. 0-90-04,
specifically Section G (1) of Riverside county Ordinance No. 457.73, for any site within one-
quarter mile of an occupied residence.
Monday-Fdday
6:30 a.m. - 6:30 p.m.
Saturday
7:00 a.m.- 6:30 p.m.
No work is permitted on Sunday or Government Holidays
Restroom fixtures, number and type shall be in accordance with the provisions of the
1998 edition of the California Building Code, Appendix Chapter 29.
Provide an approved precise grading plan for plan check submittal for checking of site-
disabled accessibility.
FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
54.
Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by
the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the
California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in
force at the time of building plan submittal.
55.
The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or
construction of all commercial buildings per CFC Appendix III.A, Table A-III-A-1. The
developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 1500 G PM at
20 PSI residual operating pressure, plus an assumed sprinkler demand of 0 G PM for a total
fire flow of 1500 GPM with a 2 hour duration. The required fire flow may be adjusted during
the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire
protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire Flow as given
above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC 903.2, Appendix Ill-A)
56.
The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC
Appendix Ill-B, Table A-III-B-1. A minimum of I hydrants, in a combination of on-site and off-
site (6" x 4" x 2-2 1/2" outlets) shall be located on Fire Department access roads and
adjacent public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 500 feet apart, at each intersection and
R:~D P~001~PA01-0082 Mission Oaks Natl. Bank~FINAL PC STAFFRPT.doc
17
57.
58.
59.
60.
61.
62.
63.
64.
65.
66.
shall be located no more than 280 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department
access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any
adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required.
(CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix Ill-B)
As required by the Califomia Fire Code, when any portion of the facility is in excess of 150
feet from a water supply on a public street, as measured by an approved route around the
exterior of the facility, on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire
flow shall be provided. For this project on site fire hydrants are required. (CFC 903.2)
If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection prior
to any building construction. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2)
Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have
approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent roads
are installed. Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface for
80,000 lbs. GVW. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2)
Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved Fire
Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or any
portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be an all
weather surface designed for 80,000 lbs. GVW with a minimum AC thickness of .25 feet. (
CFC sec 902)
Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than
twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13)
feet six (6) inches. (CFC 902.2.2.1)
Prior to building construction, dead end roadways and streets in excess of one hundred and
fifty (150) feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of
accommodating fire apparatus. (CFC 902.2.2.4)
Prior to building construction, this development shall have two (2) points of access, via all-
weather surface roads, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 902.2.1)
Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water
system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall be
signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature
block; and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. After
the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be presented to the Fire
Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system including fire hydrants shall be
installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building
materials being placed on an individual lot. (CFC 8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and National Fire
Protection Association 24 1-4.1 )
Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective Markers"
shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations. (CFC 901.4.3)
Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, approved numbers or
addresses shall be provided on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be
plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Numbers shall be of a
contrasting color to their background. Commercial, multi-family residential and industrial
R:'~D P~2.001~A01-OO82 Mission Oaks Nat. Bank~FINAL PC STAFFRPT.doc
18
67.
68.
69.
70.
71.
buildings shall have a minimum twelve (12) inches numbers with suite numbers a minimum
of six (6) inches in size. All suites shall gave a minimum of six (6) inch high letters and/or
numbers on both the front and rear doors. Single family residences and multi-family
residential units shall have four (4) inch letters and/or numbers, as approved by the Fire
Prevention Bureau. (CFC 901.4.4)
Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a "Knox-Box" shall be
provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six (6) feet in height and be located
to the right side of the main entrance door. (CFC 902.4)
Prior to final inspection of any building, the applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire
Department for approval, a site plan designating Fire Lanes with appropriate lane painting
and or signs.
Special Conditions
Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final a simple plot plan and a
simple floor plan, each as an electronic file of the .DWG format must be submitted to the
Fire Prevention Bureau. Alternative file formats may be acceptable, contact fire prevention
for approval.
The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Fire Code permit process and
update any changes in the items and quantities approved as part of their Fire Code permit.
These changes shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for review and approval per
the Fire Code and is subject to inspection. (CFC 105)
By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above
Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be' maintained in conformance
with these Conditions of Approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be
subject to Community Development Department approval.
Applicant Name
R:~D P~2001~PA01-0082 Mission Oaks Natl. Bank~FINAL PC STAFFRPT.dOC
19
A'I'rACHMENT NO. 3
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2001-
OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DENIAL
R~D P~200-t~A0~82 Mi~si0n Oaks Nail. Bank~FINAL P~ STAFFRPT.doc
20
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2001-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA DENYING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA01-0082
(CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT), TO CONSTRUCT AN ATM DRIVE-
THROUGH IN CONJUNCTION WITH A 2,200 SQUARE FOOT BANK ON A
0.17 ACRE PAD SITE LOCATED WITHIN THE EXISTING VAIL RANCH
CENTER COMMERCIAL CENTER ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF HIGHWAY 79
SOUTH AND REDHAWK PARKWAY KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL
NO. 961-080-004.
WHEREAS, Mr. Keith Johnson filed Planning Application No. 01-0082 (the "Application") in a
manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code;
WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PA01-0082 was processed including, but not limited
to public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered Planning
Application No. PA01-0082 on July 18, 2001, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law,
at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did, testify either in
support or opposition to this matter;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearings and after due consideration of the
testimony, the Commission denied the Conditional Use Permit for a drive-through facility subject to
and based upon the findings set forth hereunder;
WHEREAS, all legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES
RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1.
by reference.
That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated
Section 2 Findinqs. That the Planning Commission, in denying the Conditional Use
Permit for a drive-through lane, hereby adopts the following findings as required in Section
17.04.010 of the Temecula Municipal Code:
A. The proposed drive-through is not consistent with the objectives and intent of the General
Plan Land Use Element Village Overlay designation, nor the Vail Ranch Center Design Guidelines
for pedestrian-oriented development.
B. The proposed conditional use is not compatible with the nature, condition and development
of adjacent uses and buildings and the proposed conditional use will not adversely affect the
adjacent uses or buildings. Since the Vail Ranch Center Design Guidelines have designated this
location as a pedestrian plaza, the proposed drive-through lane would not be compatible with the
pedestrian-oriented nature planned for this particular location of the commercial center.
R:'~D P~2001'~PA01-O082 Mission Oaks Natl. Bank'~FINAL PC STAFFRPT.doc
21
C. The nature of the proposed conditional use is detrimental to the health, safety and general
welfare of the community. The drive-through lane will introduce vehicles in an area envisioned to be
for pedestrian flow. This will create an undesirable mixing of vehicles and pedestrians, which is
inconsistent with the original master plan for the shopping center.
D. That the decision to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application for a conditional
use permit be based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the planning
commission or city council on appeal. Due to the fact that the proposed drive-through lane is
inconsistent with the objectives and intent of the Village Center Overlay in the General Plan land use
element and the Vail Ranch Center Design Guidelines, the decision to deny the application for a
conditional use permit is clearly based on a view of the record as a whole and the established City
Ordinance and approved design guidelines.
Section 3. Environmental Compliance. Projects being recommended for denial do not
require a CEQA finding.
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning
Commission this eighteenth day of July 2001.
ATTEST:
Ron Guerriero, Chairman
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that
PC Resolution No. 01- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City
of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the eighteenth day of July, 2001, by the following
vote:
AYES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
NOES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
R:~) P',200%PA01*OO82 Mission Oaks Nat~. Bank~FINAL PC STAFFRPT,doc
22
ATTACHMENT NO. 4
EXHIBITS
R:~D p~2001~PA01-0082 Mission Oaks Natl. Bank~FINAL PC STAFFRPT.doc
23
CITY OF TEMECULA
CASE NO. - PA01-0082
EXHIBIT - A
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE -JULY 18, 2001
VICINITY MAP
R:~D P~2001~PA01-0082 Mission Oaks Natl. Bank~FINAL PC STAFFRPT.doc
24
CITY OF TEMECULA
ect Site
EXHIBIT B - ZONING MAP
DESIGNATION - COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL
Project Site
EXHIBIT C - GENERAL PLAN
DESIGNATION - COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL
CASE NO. - PA01-0082
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - JULY 18, 2001
P,;'~D P',2.001',PA01-OO82 Mission Oaks Natt. Bank*~FINAL PC STAFFRPT.doc
25
CiTY OF TEMECULA
~ ~8. ~X/ LA,. ,'~J, ' /~ ~ ~'~_~ [~". 'Z~,~U~ .,~ ~ ~ ~ ::~
~.~/ .'/7~ ,.i~,i X~l '/X/ ~ 1'~ ~ ~' ~ ~'~ ~ ~ ~ " - ~ ~ ~ ', '
~ --..~ ~ . _ .....
,,.. _. . ,,,
~ P~ 7 SITE PL~
L ....', .......... ~ ~ ........... ~ ~- '- ~--~ "~-~
CASE NO.- PA01-0082
EXHIBIT - D SITE PLAN P. 1
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - JULY 18, 2001
R:~D P~.O01~PA01-O082 Mission Oaks Natl. Bank~FINAL PC STAFFRPT.doc
26
CITY OF TEMECULA
F'F 53,2
,/
CASE NO. - PA01-0082
EXHIBIT- E
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - JULY 18, 2001
SITE PLAN p. 2
:) P~2001~PA01-0082 Mission Oaks NalJ. Bank~FINAL PC STAFFRPT.doc
27
ClTY OFTEMECULA
GENERAL NOTES
CASE NO. - PA01-0082
EXHIBIT- F
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - JULY 18, 2001
ELEVATION DETAIL
R:~D P~2001~PA01-O082 Mission Oaks Natl. Bank~FINAL PC STAFFRPT.doc
28
CiTY OF TEMECULA
LANDSCAPE CONCEPT PLAN
/
CASE NO. -PA01-0082
EXHIBIT - G
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - July 18, 2001
LANDSCAPE PLAN
R:X[~ P~2001~PA01-O082 Mission Oaks NatL Bank~FINAL PC STAFFRPT,doc
29
'~ CITY OF TEMECULA
_E_.I
"~-~i-'-~- ~;-; t [ ' ' ' '"'*~ 5 ~J --~ ~.¢ .....
'x'l ~,*-'-~ ....... ,',~ ~ I ' ' .~ ~./
~ ~ ,~ ~ _) ~ ._
CASE NO. - PA01-0082
EXHIB~- H FLOOR PLAN
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE -, JULY 18, 2001
R:~D P~2001~PA01-O082 Mission Oaks Natl. Bank~FINAL PC STAFFRPT.doc
30
EXHIBIT I
CITY OF T]~v~CULA Land Use Element
g. Open Space/Recreation ('Floor Area Ratio of .01 to .1)
The Open Space/R~fion designation includes both public and private
areas of permanent open space for such oses as parka, golf com~e~
recreation facilities, natural open space, recreation trails, gr~cnbclts, lakes,
utility easements, active fault zones, and ondcvclopable portions of
flqodplains along waterways. This designation ls intended to include: lands
acquired by easement, fee and other methods sanctioned by state and federal
law for parkland, for preservation of biolog/cal and cultural resources, and
for protecting public safety/rom flood, seismic and other hazards. Only
accessoo/ buildings or those structures related to parka and recreation
facilities arc intended for open space lands. ~ designation may also
accommodate cerlain commercial outdoor ~creation uses as a conditional
usc in accordance with the Development Code.
la. Public and Institutional Facilities (Floor Area Ratio of .4 to .7)
Thc public and iosfimtional facilities designation is intended for a wide
range of public and privam uses including: schools, transportation facilities,
gnvemmcnt officez, public utilities, libraries, mosenm~, public an galleries,
hospitals, and cultural facilities. To the extant possible, public and
institutional facilities should be clustered in activity centers to reinforce
other uses and boncfit from a¢_,>~__s to al~'nafive modes of mmsponation.
The public/institutional uses designated on thc Land Usc Plan are either
existing facilities or planned uses based on thc best available information.
Additional public and iostimtional uses, including churches and day care
facilities, ~ay bc developed in thc residential or non-residential land usc
designatio~ under thc procedures established in thc Development Code.
B. Village Center Overlay. Conceptual Boundaries
A pr/mary concept of the General Plan is to promote the development of special
Village Centers, with an tuban character, at key locatioos in the City. These centers
will help to provide a sense of place and focal poinm f~r community activity. The
location of thc Village Centers are shown on a separate map which is an overlay to the
l-and Use Plan (Figure 2-4). The overlay defines the conceptual boundaries of furore
Village Centers. This map is not intended to preclude the creation of other Village
Centers within thc Study Aav. a, should they be deemed appropriate by the City. The
Village Centers are/mended ~o contain a concentration and mixture of compatible uses
including: retail, office, public facilities, recreation uses and housing, designed to
encourage non-automotive modes of tr~-~ponation. In addition, each Village Center
should have design ~uidclines and d~vclopment standards to ensure a cohesiveness in
development. Several Village Centers arc designated within proposed specific plans
Data: Novgmmr 9, 1993 Page 2-32
CITY OF' TE1M~CUI~ Land Use Element
that will emure the properties are planned and developed in a comprebemive and
coordina~d manner. Development demities and intensities for the Village Cenusr
Areas are intended to be consis~at with those permitted in the underlying designations
on thc Land Use Plan (not including any density or intensity bonuses granted
aecordance with th~ provisions of the General Phn and Development Code).
C. Specific .Plan Area Overlay
The Specific Plan Aroa designation is intended for those portions of the community
which because of size, location, and special development opportunities require a
coordinated, comprehensive planning approach. In areas identified as Specific Plan
Overlay (Figure 2-$), with an aggregate arvn of 100 or more acres, approval of a
specific plan is required prior to appwval of any discretionary land use entitlement or
issuanec of any building or grading permit.
These areas include Specific Plans that were previously approved through the County
jurisdiction. The location of the Specific Plan designation is shown on a separate map
that is an overlay to the land Use Plan (Figure 2-b'). Specific plans shall be prepared
in accordance with thc requirements of Section 65451 of thc Cal/fomia Govc~mcnt
Code and the City's Development Code which contains some additional r~quircment~
tailored to the City's needs and conditions. The purpose of specific plans is to provide
comprehensive pl,nning of large areas consistent with the General Plan. Specific plans
will result in mutually beneficial and creative planning solutions for both property
owners and the City. Designated specific plan areas will require detailed plans
indicating land uses, circulation, major infrastructure and facilities, open space and
parks, and appropriate implementation mesanr~. All specific plans w/Il be evaluated with
respect to c~nsistenc:y with the goals, policies, plans and programs of thc General Plan.
1. Approved Specific Plan Areas
A total of eleven (11) specific plans have been approved within the General Plan
Study Area as of Mar~h, 1992. These are shown in Table 2-1. The specific plan
document~ are available for reference at thc City Planning Department. The
approved land uses for each of the approved specific plan areas are shown on the
General Plan Land Use Plan.
2. Future Specific
The Land Use Plan provides a guideline for future Specific Plan Areas in terms
of the land use and circulation pattern. The Land Use Plan defines the maximum
density and intensity of development, based on the desired mix of uses within the
Specific Plan Area. It is expected that future proposals for thcae Specific Plan
Areas include a land use plan that is consistent with the goals and policies of the
C-cneral Plan. The Dcvelopmcot Code contains requirements for the content and
promising procedure of specific plans. Table 2-9 provides additional direction
concerning the proposed Specific Plan Areas.
VILLAGE CENTER OVERLAY
Village Ceme~ ~
(Boundaries ar~ Conceptual)
he City of
'I'EMECULA
General Plan Program
~"~ THE
FIGURE
EXHIBIT J
MIqSION OAKS NATIONAL BANK
May 25, 2001
Planning Commission Members
City of Temecula
Dear Planning Commissioners:
The purpose of this letter is to discuss our recently submitted plans for a retail bank
branch facility of Mission Oaks National Bank to be located at 31709 Highway 79 South
(Pad #7), Temecula, CA. The branch is to be built near the intersection of Highway 79
South and Margarita Road, in the Vail Ranch Center. Specifically, we are seeking your
approval to incorporate a drive-thru deposit/withdrawal facility at our new office.
Mission Oaks National Bank is a new, local, community bank that is headquartered in
Temecula. We are a publicly traded company with approximately 325 shareholders, most
of which reside right here in the Temecula Valley. Our Board of Directors is
predominately comprised of business owners and professionals who operate and/or live
within the Temecula Valley. As such, we are keenly attuned to the needs and desires of
the area's residents. We are committed to improving the quality of life for the citizens of
Temecula and providing our services to its citizenship in a friendly, happy, personal way.
There are many reasons why a drive-up at this sight would be beneficial to all parties
involved in this process. I will focus on three of the more obvious.
1) It is extremely important for our bank facility on Highway 79 South to have a drive-up
area in order to provide distinguishing excellence in serving our customers. As you are
aware, the area surrounding the Vail Ranch Center is primarily residential. The client
base we will serve in that area is comprised largely of resident consumers. In an area
where no other financial institution offers this service, a drive-up facility communicates
that we care about our primary customers (benefit to the Bank).
2) We believe that the drive-up aspect of our office will provide a needed service for
young parents with children, citizens with disabilities and senior citizens residing in
South Temecula. The drive-up will provide residents with the option to perform banking
transactions without leaving the safety and security of their vehicle. Young parents will
be provided the option to not leave their children unattended in the car or hassle with
unbuckling and transporting them into the bank. Likewise, we believe many senior
41530 Enterprise Circle South Suite 100 · Temecula. CA 92590
Tel: (909) 719-1200 · Fax: (909) 719-1201
citizens favor having the option to do their banking from the safety of their vehicle
(benefit to the citizens of Temecula).
3) The third benefit helps The City of Temecula. We believe that the drive-up will help
to reduce traffic as consumers who presently are driving significant distances in order to
utilize a drive-up banking facility will be able to obtain that convenience, while staying
closer to home. Currently, there are no drive-up banking facilities within miles of the
subject location (benefit to The City of Temecula).
In working with The Planning Department from the City of Temecula, we have attempted
to be extremely cooperative in designing a branch with a drive-up that meets their
requirements. We have re-designed our plan six times in order to help with a "village
concept" that will be appealing to our customers and that compliments the City's design
goals. This re-design process has been performed at considerable time and dollar
expense to our business. The Vail Ranch Center is already a vehicular traffic oriented
center and our drive-up is adjacent to the main arterial thoroughfare. Our goal has been
to add an attractive building to the community while servicing our customers with the
personal service they desire.
In summary, the drive-up is an important aspect of our business. It communicates the
personal touch that our company strives to provide. It represents a small addition to a
previously approved building plan. The drive-up results in a mutually beneficial addition
whereby Mission Oaks National Bank, the citizens of Temecula and The City of
Temecula itself...win. My hope is that you will see the importance and the benefits of
the drive-up at this facility for all of us.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Kei~ Johnson
EVP/COO
EXHIBIT K
March 6, 2001
Michael McCoy, Case Planner
CiB' of Temecula
Planning Depamnent
43200 Business Park Drive
Post Office Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
SUBJECT:
WATER AVAILABILITY
PAD 7 OF PARCEL NO. 4 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 28508
APN 961-080-004
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA01-0082
Dear Mr. McCoy:
Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located within the
boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD). Water sen'ice,
therefore, would be available upon completion of financial arrangements between
RCWD and the property owner.
If fire protection is required, the customer will need to contact RCWD for fees and
requirements.
Water availability would be contingent upon the property owner signing an
Agency Agreement that assigns water management rights, if any, to RCWD.
If you should have any questions, please contact an Engineering Services
Representative at this office.
Sincerely,
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT
Steve Brannon, P.E.
Development Engineering Manager
01XSB:at065\F012oT3\FCF
DAVID P. ZAPPE
General Manager-Chic f Engineer
EXHIBIT L
5115
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL
AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
City of Te..mecula
Planning uepartment
Post Office Box 9033
Temecula, California 92589-9033
Attention: ~v~ t fLH ~ I
Ladies and Gentlemen: / Re:
The District does not normally recommend conditions for land divisions or other land use cases in incorporated
ci,ties. The District. also .d .o.o.o.o.o.o.o.o.o~ not,plan check_ city land use cases, or provide State Division of Real Estate letters Or
omar flood, haze .m. reports mr su..cn _c~. es. uis~ com_.ments/recomme_ndations for such cases are normally limited
to items ot specific i.nterest to me uisthct inauaing uistrict Master ura nage P an faci ties other regional flood
control and draina,qe ~acilitie_s. whi.ch could b.e consi.de ..r~:l. aog .ca com. ponemor ext.ension of a.master plan system,
and District Area urainage ~'lan tees (development mitig~on tees), m addition, imormation o~ a general nature is
provided.
The .D.)s.~ct h.as n.ot_r.evi.'.ew, ed the p .roposed,pmject in. de.~il and the fo!lowing ch ..e.c,k, ed comments do not in any way
.con,s..a~e.or [m.p~y uism~ appro.va~ or enaorsemem o~ me propose~ project wire respect to hood hazard, public
n?~no sa~e~y or any oaler SUCh issue:
~./ This project would not' be impacted by D strict Master Drainage Plan faci it es nor are other facilities 0f
regional interest proposed.
This project involves District Master Plan facilities. The District will accept ownership of such facilities on
.~tten .reque. st of the C. ity. Facilities must be constructed to District standards, and District plan check and
ins .~.on vail be required for District acceptance. Plan check, inspection and administrative fees will be
requlreO.
This p.roje~t, proposes channels, storm drains 36 inches or larger.in d treater, or other facilities that could
consme...reo regional in nature and/or a logical extension of the aoopted
M.a..ster_u..rain_age Plan. The District would consider accepting ownership _
.orme Nity.. ~a_ci!~ .es.must b.e const_m._.cted, to pi.strtct s~ndard.s a, nd District p!an check and inspection will
De requ~re~ ror ulsmc~ acceptance. Hlan crecy, Inspecaon aha aaministrative tees will be required.
This project is located within the limits of the District's Area
Drainage Plan for which drainage fees have been adopted; applicable tees should be paid by cashier's
c~..ec~, or money order only to the Flood Control District prior to ssuance of building or gradingpermits
whichever comes first. Fees to be paid should be at the rate in effect at the time of issuance of the actua
permit.
GENERAL INFORMATION
This project may recluire a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water
_Resouroe.s Conffol Board. Clearance fo.r grading recordation, or other tint approval should not be given until the
~ity has netarmined that the project has peen granted a perm t or s shown to be exempt.
If thi.s proju~:~ inv,.olves, a. Federa! Emerggn..cy Man,age. m. ent Age. ncy (FE.MA] mappod flood plain, then the C ty shou d
require me. appl~.ca.m to, ,p. ro.w.'de all stuoi.ess .,calcula~ons. pla. ns and.. om. er Iriformation required to meet FEMA
requirements ant snou~a mrmer require mat me appficam obtain a uonaitional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR)
prior to grad ng, recordation or other final approval' 0f the project, and a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) prior to
occupancy.
If a natural watercourse or mapped flood plain is impacted by this project, the City should require the app. licant to
obtain a Section 1601/1603 Agreement from the ~Jalifomia Department of Fish and Game and a Clean water Act
S ..e~o.n 4..04 Permit from the..U.S..Army Corps of Engineers, or written correspondence from these agencies
inaicating me project is exempt trom mesa _requirements. A Clean Water Act Section 401 Water Qua ty Cert~cation
may be required from the local California Regional Water Quality Control Board pdor to issuance of the Corps 404
permit.
1995 MARKET STKEE'~
RIVERSIDE,!CA 92501
909/955-1200
909/788-9965 FAX
Very truly yours,
STUART E. MCKIBBIN
Senior Civil Engineer
Date: '~'- '~ -~)O'[
ITEM #5
STAFF REPORT- PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
July 18, 2001
Planning Application No. 00-0397
(Development Plan)
Prepared By: Thomas Thornsley, Associate Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
The Community Development Department - Planning Division Staff
recommends the Planning Commission:
ADOPT a Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. 00-0397
(Development Plan) based on the Determination of Consistency with
a project for which an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was
previously certified pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 -
Subsequent EIR's and Negative Declarations.
2. ADOPT a Resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2001-.__
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 00-
0397 - A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE DESIGN, AND
CONSTRUCTION OF FOUR OFFICE BUILDINGS TOTALING
48,000 SQUARE FEET; AND THREE FUTURE UNDEVELOPED
AREAS CAPABLE OF ACCOMMODATING AN 8,000 SQUARE
FOOT OFFICE BUILDING, UP TO A 7,500 SQUARE FOOT
RESTAURANT, AND A THREE STORY 84-ROOM HOTEL OR
13,868 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE BUILDING, ALL ON AN 11.86-
ACRE SITE ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF OVERLAND
DRIVE AND MARGARITA ROAD, WITHIN THE REGIONAL
CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN, KNOWN AS LOTS B & C OF LOT LINE
ADJUSTMENT NO. PA99-0424, ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO'S.
APN 921-810-012 AND 921-81 0-017.
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
PROPOSAL:
MCA Amhitects, Inc., Vandana R. Kelkar, 1247 Pomona Rd.,
Corona, CA 92720
A development plan for the design and construction of four
office buildings totaling 48,000 square feet; and three future
undeveloped areas capable of accommodating an 8,000
square foot office building, up to a 7,500 square foot
R:~D P~2000~0-0397 Margarita Village Phase 4~Staff reporl PC 7-18-01.doc
1
LOCATION:
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION:
EXISTING ZONING:
restaurant, and a three-story84 room hotel or 13,868 square
foot office building on an 11.86 acre lot.
On the northwest corner of Overland Drive and Margarita
Road within The Promenade Mall (APN's 921-810-012 and
921-810~017)
PO (Professional Office)
SP-7 (Specific Plan-7 Temecula Regional Center)
SURROUNDING ZONING:
EXISTING LAND USE:
SURROUNDING LAND USES:
PROJECT STATISTICS
Total Gross Area:
Total Net Area:
North: SP-7 (Specific Plan-7 Temecula Regional Center)
South: BP (Business Park)
East: LM (Medium Low Density Residential) and H (High
Density Residential)
West: SP-7 (Specific Plan-7 Ternecula Regional Center)
Vacant
North: Vacant (Approved for retail center.)
South: Vacant
East: Single family detached homes and apartments.
West: Promenade Mall
516,622 square feet
379,408 square feet
11.9 acres
8.7 acres
Total Building Area:
Building "Al":
Building "B1, C1, DI":
Building "Gl":
Building "Restaurant":
Building "Hotel":
Total Building Footprints:
Hardscape:
Landscape Area:
Paved Area:
Parking Required:
Parking Required:
Parking Required:
Total Parking Required:
Parking Provided:
Net Office
Restaurant
Hotel
123,500 square feet
8,000 square feet
29,400 square feet
18,600 square feet
7,500 square feet
60,000 square feet
74,200 square feet
25,000 square feet
75,800 square feet
204,408 square feet
49,000 square feet/(1:250)
7,500 square feet/(1:100)
84 rooms/(1 :room + 2 manager)
0.33 FAR
1.5%
5.7%
3.6%
1.4%
11.6%
19.5%
6.6%
20.0%
53.9%
196 spaces
75 spaces
86 spaces
357 spaces
358 spaces
R:\D P~000\00-0397 Margarita Village Phase 4\Staf report PC 7-18-01.doc
2
BACKGROUND
The applicant submitted a formal application to the Planning Department on October 4, 2000. A
Development Review Committee meeting was held on November 9, 2000. Site design changes and
follow up reviews were made in January and March. Based on past traffic concerns, a supplemental
traffic study was required and reviewed by the Ci~s Traffic Engineer. The supplemental report was
found to be appropriate and confirmed that the proposed development would be consistent with the
allowable peak hour traffic volumes approved for the Specific Plan.
PROJECT DESCRIP~ON
The applicant is proposing the design and development of an 11.86 acre site primarily for office
uses (five buildings) with an option for a restaurant and an 84 teem hotel or office. This application
provides for the design of the entire site, and has architectural plans for the four office buildings
clustered in the center of the site.
ANALYSIS
Site Desiqn and Circulation
This site is roughly triangular in shape with its frontages being the northwest corner of Overland
Drive, Margarita Road and the Long Canyon Wash. There are three points of access to the site,
one from each street and the third from the mall access drive on the west end of the property near
the wash. Each driveway has been designed with a long, unobstructed throat to avoid creating
back-up conflicts that would impede the street traffic. Within the site there are building pads in each
of the three comers and a collection of four office buildings in the center of the site. A drive aisle
circulates around the center buildings allov, ing for a free flow of traffic throughout the site.
Currently, four-office buildings are proposed for development in the center of the site. There will be
three single story buildings and one two-story building. The placement of the buildings creates an
internal courtyard with walking paths leading out to the perimeter sidewalks and the parking areas.
On the northeast comer of the site is a pad for a future office building up to 8,000 square feet. On
the corner of Overland Ddve and Margarita Road is a pad for a future restaurant no larger than
7,500 square feet. In the southwest comer of the site is a large pad for future development that can
accommodate either an 84 teem hotel or 13,868 square feet of office space. Later development of
these future building sites will require separate reviews and approvals. Those buildings under
10,000 square feet can be administratively approved and those over 10,000 square feet will require
Planning Commission approval. As a note, these defined future building sizes are based on
available on-site parking and a traffic study to ensure that the vehicle trips de not exceed the
allowable limits approved for the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan.
Architecture & Colors
The exterior finishes of the three single story office buildings are kept clean with simple form using a
warm tan stucco and green glass ~indows. The glass is used to create an entry statement in the
canter of the long sides of these rectangular buildings, which is arched back into the structure. A
window band wraps around the entire building and is slightly recessed from the upper wall fascia.
Vertical accenting columns, that step in as they rise up the wall, are used on the comers, the entries,
and at mid-points along the building walls to break up the building elevations. Capping the walls is a
delicate cornice. The two story building, designed like the single story building, has a second
window band with all the same characteristics. The architecture style of this site is distinctively
different from the surrounding uses to visually separate these offices from the neighboring retail
developments while keeping the buildings and the site in character ~ith the Specific Plan.
R:'~D 1:~2000\00-0397 Margarita Village Phase 4\Staf report PC 7-18-01.doc
3
Landscapinq
As required by the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan, at least 15% of the site must be
landscaped and this project is providing 20%, with the bulk of the landscaping being provided along
the two street frontages and on the graded slope above Long Canyon Wash. The Specific Plan
specifies a 32 foot landscape zone (include the 12 foot parkway) along both roadways lined with
random placement of trees with turf and shrubs to screen parking areas. The primary trees along
Margarita Road will be California Pepper (24" box). The proposed landscape plan shows California
Pepper (24" box) on Overland Drive and Creep Myrtles (24" box) are used to accent the entry drive
aisle, however, both trees must be changed to be consistent with the specific plan. The street tree
for Overland Drive should be African Sumac (24" box) and Holly Oaks (24" box) should accent the
driveway entries. A condition of approval has been added to make the necessary changes to the
landscape plan.
In addition, there is a large portion of landscaping intermixed with the placement of the four office
buildings making up a common courtyard and perimeter landscaping. Around the building will be
California Pepper (24" box), Creep Myrtles (24" box), Sycamores (24" box), and a variety of shrubs.
Shrubs will provide accent color and screening around the base of the building and throughout the
courtyard. Six Canary Island Palms (14' clear trunk) will be used to make the corner statement at
Overland and Margarita with flowing shrubs in the foreground, a monument wall in the center
flanked by the palms allowing a view from the corner into the site
Gradin.q
Along both street frontages the site remains relatively level while the grades of the streets vary,
putting them above and below the finished site grade. The existing contours along the parkways
have created difficulties in meeting the requirement for the 4:1 slopes specified in the specific plan.
Throughout the entire specific plan project area, this has presented difficulties to applicants
attempting to set pad heights, not create conflict to the street grades, and not drastically reduce the
buildable areas. The Specific Plan allows for variation to the standards during the development
review and approval process if the approving body feels it is warranted.
Staff believes that the deviation in slope along the street will not be detrimental to the appearance of
the site, and the digital photo simulations submitted by the applicant help portray the finished site.
Margarita Road gradually rises above the site and the terrain slopes from level grade behind the
sidewalks transitioning down a 3:1 slope, then to a 2:1 slope, and in one area ending with a short
retaining wall internal to the site. Along Overland Drive the same situation occurs from the street
corner to the driveway entry. From the entry west, the street grade drops and a 3:1 slope separates
the building pad from the street, which is 12 feet below the pad grade at the mall entry drive aisle.
All of these slopes will be fully landscaped and providing the appropriate screening where necessary
and enhancing the view from the street.
Parkinq
Based on the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan's parking standards, assuming the proposed
mix of uses, this project will require 357 parking spaces. As designed, the project provides 358
parking spaces. Should the hotel site be developed for office.use, the total square footage of this
building will be limited to the parking that is currently provided for the hotel. At present, the hotel has
85 parking spaces, which converts to 21,500 square feet of office space. However, based on the
trips generated by these two different uses there is only an allowance for 13,868 square feet of
office space in place of the hotel. To assure these limits are maintained, a condition of approval has
been added limiting the size of any change in use to the parking that can be provided.
R:~ P',2000~00-0397 Margarita Village Phase 4~Staff report PC 7-18-01 .doc
4
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
This project is within the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan No. 263 for which an
Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared and certified. Under California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15162 (Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations)' this
project is exempt and a Notice of Exemption has been prepared for Planning Application No. 00-
0213.
Section 15162 applies when an EIR has been certified or negative declaration adopted for a project,
no subsequent EIR shall be prepared for that project unless there are substantial changes not
discussed or examined in the EIR.
The affected area of the site development meets the criteria noted by developing consistent with the
Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan No. 263 land uses which anticipated retail, restaurant,
office, and hotel uses. Therefore, the proposed project is eligible for a CEQA exemption pursuant to
Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines.
GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING CONSISTENCY
The project is consistent with the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan 263, Professional Office
(PO) land use designations of the Temecula General Plan and the Development Code. Upon
approval of the Development Plan as conditioned, the project will meet all of the guidelines and
standards for office development prescribed by the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan No.
263, Development Code, and Design Guidelines.
SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS
The project has been determined by staff to be consistent with applicable City policies, standards
and guidelines. We believe it is compatible with the nature and quality of surrounding development,
and will represent an attractive, functional and economic addition to the City's commercial and
employment base.
FINDINGS - DEVELOPMENT PLAN
The proposal is consistent with the land use designation and policies reflected in the
Community Commercial (CC) and Professional Office (PO) land use standards in the City of
Temecula General Plan, as well as the development standards for Specific Plan No. 263
contained in the City's Development Code. The site is therefore properly planned and zoned
and found to be physically suitable for the type and density of commercial development
proposed. The project, as conditioned, is also consistent with other applicable requirements
of State law and local ordinance, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA),
the City Wide Design Guidelines, Ordinance No. 655 (Mt. Palomar Lighting Ordinance), the
City's Water Efficient Landscaping provisions, and fire and building codes.
The overall design of the project, including the site, building, parking, circulation and other
associated site improvements, is consistent with and intended to protect the health and
safety of those working in and around the site. The project has been reviewed for, and as
conditioned has been found to be consistent with, all applicable policies, guidelines,
standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and
function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety and welfare.
R:',D P~2000~00-0397 Margarita Village Phase 4~Staff report PC 7-18-01.doc
5
Attachments:
1.
2.
PC Resolution - Blue Page 6
Exhibit A. Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 9
Exhibits - Blue Page 20
A. Vicinity Map
B. Zoning Map
C. General Plan
D. Site Plan
E. Elevation - Single Story
F. Elevation - Two Story
G. Landscape Plan
R:~D P~ZOO0~00-O397 Margarita Vi[rage Phase 4~Staff report PC 7-18-01 .doc
6
ATFACHMENT NO. 1
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2001-__
R:~D P~2.000~00-0397 Margarita Village Phase 4~Staff report PC 7-18-01.doc
7
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2001-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 00-
0397 - A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE DESIGN, AND
CONSTRUCTION OF FOUR OFFICE BUILDINGS TOTALING
48,000 SQUARE FEET; AND THREE FUTURE UNDEVELOPED
AREAS CAPABLE OF ACCOMMODATING AN 8,000 SQUARE
FOOT OFFICE BUILDING, UP TO A 7,500 SQUARE FOOT
RESTAURANT, AND A THREE STORY 84-ROOM HOTEL OR
13,868 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE BUILDING, ALL ON AN 11.86-
ACRE SITE ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF OVERLAND
DRIVE AND MARGARITA ROAD, WITHIN THE REGIONAL
CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN, KNOWN AS LOTS B & C OF LOT LINE
ADJUSTMENT NO. PA99-0424, ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO'S.
APN 921-810-012 AND 921-810-017.
WHEREAS, Margarita Medical Condo Development, LLC, filed Planning Application No. 00-
0397, in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code;
WHEREAS, Planning Application No. 00-0397 was processed including, but not limited to
public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. 00-0397 on July
18, 2001, at duly noticed public hearings as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and
interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this
matter;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the
testimony, the Commission approved Planning Application No. 00-0397;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE crrY OF TEMECULA DOES
RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by
reference.
Section 2. Findinqs. The Planning Commission, in approving Planning Application No. 00-
0397 hereby makes the following findings as required by Section 17.05.010.F of the Temecula
Municipal Code:
A. The proposal is consistent with the land use designation and policies reflected in the
Community Commercial (CC) and Professional Office (PO) land use standards in the City of
Temecula General Plan, as well as the development standards for Specific Plan No. 263 contained
in the City's Development Code. The site is therefore properly planned and zoned and found to be
physically suitable for the type and density of commercial development proposed. The project, as
conditioned, is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local ordinance,
including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City Wide Design Guidelines,
Ordinance No. 655 (Mt. Palomar Lighting Ordinance), the City's Water Efficient Landscaping
provisions, and fire and building codes.
R:~D 1=~2000~:}0-0397 Margarita Village Phase 4~Staff report PC 7-18-Ol.doc
8
B. The overall design of the project, including the site, building, parking, circulation and
other associated site improvements, is consistent with and intended to protect the health and safety
of those working in and around the site. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned has
been found to be consistent with, all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations
intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent
with the public health, safety and welfare.
Section 3. Environmental Compliance. A Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No.
00-0397 was made per the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15162. This
section applies when an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) has been certified or negative
declaration adopted for a project, no subsequent EIR shall be prepared for that project unless there
are substantial changes not discussed or examined in the EIR.
Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby
conditionally approves Planning Application No. 00-0397 for a Development Plan to design, and
construction of four office buildings totaling 48,000 square feet; and three future undeveloped areas
capable of accommodating an 8,000 square foot office building, up to a 7,500 square foot
restaurant, and a three-story 84 room hotel or 13,868 square foot office building on an 11.86 acre lot
on the northwest comer of Ovedand Drive and Margarita Road, and known as Assessor Parcel No.
921-810-012 and 921-810-017. The Conditions of Approval are contained in Exhibit A.
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning
Commission this 18th day of July 2001.
ATTEST:
Ron Guerriero, Chairperson
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
{SEAL}
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
City of Temecula )
I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that
PC Reso ution No. 01- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City
of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 18th day of July 2001, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
R:~D p~2000~00-0397 Margarita Vitlage Phase 4~Staff report PC 7-18-01.doc
9
EXHIBIT A
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
DEVELOPMENT PLAN
R:'~D P~2000~{~0-0397 Margarita Village Phase 4~Stafl report PC 7-18-01 ,doc
10
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No. 00-0397 (De~lopment Plan)
Project Description:
The design, and construction of four office buildings
totaling 48,000 square feet; and three future undeveloped
areas capable of accommodating an 8,000 square foot
office building, up to a 7,500 square foot restaurant, and
a three-story 84 room hotel or 13,868 square foot office
building on an 11.86 acre lot on the northwest corner of
Overland Drive and Margarita Road.
DIF Category:
$2.00 per square foot (pursuant to the Development
Agreement for the Promenade Mall Project PA96-0333)
Assessor Parcel No.:
· Approval Date:
Expiration Date:
921-810-012 and 921-810-017
July 18, 2001
July 18, 2003
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Within Forty-Eight (48) Houm of the Approval of this Project
1. The applicant shall deliver to the Community Development Department- Planning Division a
cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of seventy-
eight Dollars ($78.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice
of Exemption as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21108(b) and California
Code of Regulations Section 15062. Ifwithin said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant
has not delivered to the Community Development Department- Planning Division the check
as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by rsason of failure of
condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c).
General Requirements
2. The permittee/applicant shall indemnify, protect and hold harmless, the City and any agency
or instrumentalitythereof, and/or any of its officers, employees, and agents from any and all
claims, actions, or proceedings against the City, or any agency or instrumentalitythereof, or
any of its officers, employees, and agents, to attack, set aside, void, annul, or seek monetary
damages resulting from an approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof,
advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters
of the City, concerning the Planning Application which action is brought within the
appropriate statute of limitations period and Public Resources Code, Division 13, Chapter 4
(Section 21000 et seq., including but not by the way of limitations Section 21152 and 21167).
The City shall promptly notify the permittee/applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding
brought forth within this time period. The City shall estimate the cost of the defense of the
action and applicant shall deposit said amount with the City. City may require additional
deposits to cover anticipated costs. City shall refund, without interest, any unused portions
of the deposit once the litigation is finally concluded. Should the City fail to either promptly
R:~D P~2000~00-0397 Margarita Vi[lage Phase 4\Staf report PC 7-18-01.doc
11
10.
notify or cooperate fully, permittee/applicant shall not, thereafter be responsible to indemnify,
defend, protect, or hold harmless the City, any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its
officers, employees, or agents. Should the applicant fail to timely post the required deposit,
the Director may terminate the land use approval without further notice to the applicant.
This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall
become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction
contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period which is thereafter diligently
pursued to completion or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this
approval.
The applicant shall comply with all mitigation measures contained in the approved Mitigation
Monitoring Program for the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan.
The applicant shall comply with the Conditions of Approval for Planning Application No. 97-
0118 (Promenade Mall) unless superceded by these Conditions of Approval.
The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibit "D"
(Site Plan), contained on file with the Community Development Department - Planning
Division. Additionally, the following criteria must be met prior to development of the project:
a. All ground mounted utility/mechanical equipment shall not be placed in prominent
locations visible to the public. This equipment shall be screened from view.
b. Per the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan and the Design Guidelines, the
double detector check assembly must be installed underground.
c. Provide the Planning Department with a copy of the underground water plans and
electrical plans for verification of proper placement of the transformer and the double
detector check prior to tinal agreement with the utility companies.
d. The loading spaces next to building B-1 and the parking lone parking stall next to the
trash enclosure across from building G-1 shall be relocated to elsewhere on the site
where they will not conflict with on-site circulation.
Parking lot lights shall be of a type consistent with the standards used throughout the Mall,
which have been a dark bronze, round tapered pole with a mounded height of twenty to
thirty-five (20-35) feet. The site lighting plan shall be approved by the Planning Department
pdor to installation.
Any outside wall-mounted lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly
upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way. Details of these lights shall be submitted to
the Planning Department during plan check for review pdor to installation. The installation of
wall pack style light shall not be used along the street side ele'~tion.
Building elevations shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibits "E and F" (Building
Elevations), contained on file with the Community Development Department - Planning
Division as amended by these changes:
a. All mechanical and roof-mounted equipment shall be hidden by building elements
that were designed for that purpose as an integral part of the building. When
determined to be necessary by the Director of Planning, the parapet will be raised to
provide for this screening.
Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable
satisfaction of the Director of Planning. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being
maintained, the Director of Planning shall have the authority to require the property owner to
bdng the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued
R:~D p',2000\00-0397 Margarita Village Phase 4\Staf repori PC 7-18-01 .doc
12
maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any
successors in interest.
11. The Landscaping Plan shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibit "F" (Landscape
Plan) and as amended by the following:
a. The street trees installed along Overland Drive shall be consistent with the street
tree planted along the Costco site.
b. The landscaping at the main mall access entry adjacent to Costco and the street
entries to the site shall be consistent with Figures 23 and 25 respectively, in the
Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan and the master streetscape landscape
plans prepared by Mesa Design Group for the Promenade Mall.
c, All slopes shall be landscaped in accordance with Temecula Regional Center
Specific Plan and the City of Temecula slope planting requirements within 90 day of
completion of the grading or the before issuance of the first certificate of occupancy
as determined by the Director of Planning.
d. All undeveloped pads shall be temporarily landscaped in accordance with Temecula
Regional Center Specific Plan.
e. Modifications recommended by the City's landscape architect for consistency with
the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan shall be completed prior to landscape
plan approval.
12. The colors and materials for this project shall substantially conform to the following list of
approved colors and materials and with the Color and Material Board contained on file with
the Community Development Department - Planning Division. Any deviation from the
approved colors and materials shall require approval of the Director of Planning.
Material Finish & Color
Windows, doors Green aluminum storefront frames with "Evergreen" tined glazing
Wall face Sawyer's Fence Frazee # 8231W (light tan) over dashed stucco finish
Wall columns Sawyer's Fence Frazee # 8231W (light tan) over dashed stucco finish
13.
14,
The conceptual grading plan shall be revised as follows:
a. Contour grade and round out the corner of the site where Margarita P,oad and the
wash intersect.
b. The retaining walls along the drive aisle taking access from the Mall Entry Ddve shall
be modified such that the upper retaining wall does not extend to the same end
points and the lower wall thereby better contouring these slopes.
c. Adjust the grade of the slope on the comer of Overland Drive and the Mall Entry
Road to lessen the sevedty of the slope and allow for installation of the landscape
entry statement required bythe specific plan
The applicant or owner of this project shall submit a use and parking ratio synopsis, for any
change is use, on any portions of the undeveloped pad sites, for staff's review and approval
to ensure that the proposed use can meet the parking needs and not exceed the trip counts
determined by the Final Revised EIP, Traffic Study Consistency Letter for Proposed Bel
Villaggio/Overland Corporate Center Project, prepared by Wilbur Smith Associates, dated
June 18, 2001.
R:\D P~2000\00-0397 Margarita Village Phase 4~Staf report PC 7-18-01.doc
13
Prior to the Issuance of Grading Permits
15. The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be provided
by the Community Development Department- Planning Division staff, and tatum one signed
set to the Community Development Department - Planning Division for their files.
16. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal
Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that Ordinance or by
providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid.
17. If necessary the applicant shall revise Exhibits "D, E, F and G", (Site Plan, Elevations,
Landscape Plan, Color and Material Board) to reflect the final Conditions of Approval and
submit five (5) full size copies.
18. The applicant shall submit to the Community Development Department - Planning Division
for permanent filing two (2) 8" X 10" glossy photographic color prints of the approved Color
and Materials Board and of the colored version of approved Exhibit "E", the colored
architectural elevations to the Community Development Department- Planning Division for
their files. All labels on the Color and Materials Board and Elevations shall be readable on
the photographic prints.
Prior to the Issuance of Building Permits
19. A Consistency Check fee shall be paid per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule.
20. Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be submitted to the .
Community Development Department - Planning Division for approval. These plans shall
conform substantially with the approved Exhibit"F", or as amended by these conditions. The
location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The
plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The cover page shall identify
the total square footage of the landscaped area for the site. The plans shall be
accompanied by the following items:
a. Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal).
b. One (1) copy of the approved grading plan.
c. Water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water
Efficient Ordinance).
d. Total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with the approved
plan).
Prior to the Issuance of Occupancy Permits
21. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall ha~e been installed consistent with the
approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Director of
Planning. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation
system shall be properly constructed and in good working order.
22. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Planning, to
guarantee the maintenance of the plantings, in accordance with the approved construction
landscape and irrigation plan shall be filed with the Community Development Department-
Planning Division for one year from final certificate of occupancy. After that year, if the
landscaping and irrigation system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the
Director of Planning, the bond shall be released upon request bythe applicant.
23. Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently
affixed reflectorized sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying
the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square
inches in area and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space at a minimum
R:\D P~2000\00-0397 Margarita Vitlage Phase 4\Staf report PC 7-18-01.doc
14
height of 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space finished grade, or
centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space finished grade, ground,
or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each entrance to the off-
street parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches, cleady and conspicuously stating
the following:
"Unauthorized vehicles parked in designated accessible spaces not
displaying distinguishing placards or license plates issued for
persons with disabilities may be towed away at owner's expense.
Towed vehicles may be reclaimed bytelephoning 909 696-3000."
In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall have a
surface identification sign duplicating the Symbol of Accessibility in blue paint of at least 3
square feet in size.
24. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed
by this permit.
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
25. Unless otherwise noted, all conditions shall be completed by the Developer at no cost to any
Government Agency. Iris understood that the Developer correctly shows on the site plan all
existing and proposed property lines, easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints
and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for
further review and revision.
General Requirements
26. All proposed accesses to Margarita Road and Overland Drive shall be restricted to right-
in/right-out only.
27. The Developer shall improve and maintain Long Canyon Creek.
28. A Grading Permit for either rough and/or precise grading, including all on-site fiat work and
improvements, shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained street right-of-way.
29. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way.
30. All improvement plans, grading plans and raised landscaped median plans shall be
coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to
the site and shall be submitted on standard 24" x36" City of Temecula mytars.
Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit
31. A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed and
approved by the Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include all necessary
erosion control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and pdvate property.
32. The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and
erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to
approval by the Department of Public Works.
33. The Developer shall have a Drainage Study prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in
accordance with City Standards identifying storm water runoff expected from this site and
upstream of this site. The study shall identify all existing or proposed public or private
drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. The study shall also analyze and identify
impacts to downstream properties and provide specific recommendations to protect the
R:'~D P~000\00-0397 Margarita Village Phase 4\Staf report PC 7-18-01.doc
15
properties and mitigate any impacts. Any upgrading or upsizing of downstream facilities,
including acquisition of drainage or access easements necessary to make required
improvements, shall be provided by the Developer.
34. The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No
grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or the
project is shown to be exempt.
35. As deemed necessary by the Director of the Department of Public Works, the Developer
shall receive written clearance fi.om the following agencies:
a. San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board
b. Planning Department
c. Department of Public Works
36. The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an Environmental
Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject property.
37. Permanent landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department
and the Department of Public Works for review and approval.
38. ~he Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or slope easements for off-site
work performed on adjacent properties as directed bythe Department of Public Works.
39. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation Distdct by either cashier's check or
money order, pdor to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area drainage plan fee. If
the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been credited to this
property, no new charge needs to be paid.
Prior to Issuance of a Building Permit
40. A Tentative Parcel Map shall be filed and processed with the City. The Parcel Map shall be
approved and recorded.
41. Improvement plans and/or precise grading plans shall conform to applicable City of
Temecula Standards subject to approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works.
The following design criteria shall be observed:
a. Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over A.C.
paving.
b. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula Standard No. 207A.
c. Street lights shall be installed along Overland Drive adjoining the site in accordance
with City Standard No. 800, 801,802 and 803.
d. All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees.
e. Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and
adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility.
f. All concentrated drainage directed towards the public street shall be conveyed
through undersidewalk drains.
42. The Developer shall construct the following public improvements to City of Temecula
General Plan standards unless otherwise noted. Plans shall be reviewed and approved by
the Director of the Department of Public Works:
R:\D P~000\00-0397 Margarita Village Phase 4\Staf report PC 7-18-01.doc
16
a. The Developer shall design and construct a 14 feet wide raised landscaped median
on Overland Ddve along the property frontage from the easterly terminus of the
existing raised landscaped median to Margarita Road. Plans shall be reviewed and
approved by the Department of Public Works.
b. The Developer shall install street lights along Overland Drive adjoining the site in
accordance with City Standard No. 800, 801,802 and 803.
43. A construction area Traffic Control Plan shall be designed by a registered Civil or Traffic
Engineer and reviewed by the Director of the Department of Public Works for any street
closure and detour or other disruption to traffic circulation as required by the Department of
Public Works.
44. A Signing and Striping Plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and approved
by the Department of Public Works for Overland Drive.
45. The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance with
the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered Civil Engineer, and the Soil Engineer
shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions.
46. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as
required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all
Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06.
Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy
47. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
a. Rancho California Water District
b. Eastern Municipal Water Distdct
c. Department of Public Works
48. All public improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and
City standards to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works.
49. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall
be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of
Public Works.
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
50. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 1998 edition of the
California Building, Plumbing, Mechanical and Fire Codes; 1998 National Electrical Code;
California ,Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy and Disabled Access Regulations and the
Temecula Municipal Code.
51. Provide a building area analysis for Building F-1 to justify the construction type and number
of stories
52. Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plan showing compliance with
Palomar Lighting Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All streetlights and
other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of
Building and Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine
directly upon adjoining preperty or public rights-of-way.
53. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction
work.
R:\D P~2000\00-0397 Margarita Village Phase 4~Staf report PC 7-18-01.doc
17
54. A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector pdor to commencement of
any construction or inspections.
55. Disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the buildings is required. The
path of travel shall meet the California Disabled Access Regulations in terms of cross slope,
travel slope, stripping and signage. Provide all details on plans. (California Disabled
Access Regulations effective April 1, 1998). Provide precise grading plan for plan check
submittal to check for handicap accessibility
56. All buildings shall comply with the applicable provisions of the California Disabled Access
Regulations effective April 1, 1998. Provide the proper number of disabled parking
spaces located as close as possible to the main entries in accordance with California
building Code Table 11B-6. Provide a site plan as requested above which indicates
compliance with this.
57. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with odginal signature on plans and
structural calculations submitted for plan review.
58. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule for plan review.
59. Provide house-electrical meters at each building for the purpose of providing power for fire
alarm systems and extedor lighting.
60. Schematic plumbing plans, electrical plan and load calculations, along with mechanical
equipment and ducting plans shall be submitted for plan review stamped and odginal signed
by an appropriate registered professional.
61. Obtain street addresses from the Building Official prior to submittal of plans for plan review.
62. Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrant to the project that indicates the hours
of construction, shown below, as allowed by City of Temecula Ordinance No. 0-90-04,
specifically Section G (1) of Riverside county Ordinance No. 457.73, for any site within one-
quarter mile of an occupied residence.
Monday-Friday 6:30 a.m. -6:30 p.m.
Saturday 7:00 a.m.- 6:30 p.m.
No work is permitted on Sundayor Government Holidays
63. Provide an approved automatic fire sprinkler system.
64. Restroom fixtures, number and type shall be in accordance with the provisions of the 1998
edition of the California Building Code, Appendix Chapter 29.
65. Provide an approved precise grading plan for plan check submittal for checking of site
disabled accessibility.
FIRE DEPARTMENT
The following are the Fire Department Conditions of Approval for this project. All questions
regarding the meaning of these conditions shall be referred to the Fire Pre~ntion Bureau.
66. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by
the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the
California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in
force at the time of building plan submittal.
67. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or
construction of all commercial buildings per CFC Appendix Ill.A, Table A-III-A-1. The
developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 4000 GPM at
20 PSI residual operating pressure, plus an assumed sprinkler demand of 850 GPM for a
R:~D I:A2000\00-0397 Margarita Vittage Phase 4\Staf report PC 7-18-01.doc
18
total fire flow of 4850 GPM with a 4 hour duration. The required fire flow may be adjusted
dudng the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire
protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire Flow as given
above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC 903.2, Appendix Ill-A) Each
individual building will need to meet the sprinkler demand conditions separately with the 850
GPM available per riser.
68. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC
Appendix Ill-B, Table A-III-B-1. A combination of on-site and off-site super fire hydrants (6" x
4" x 2-2 1/2" outlets) on a looped system shall be located on fire access roads and adjacent
to public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 300 feet apart, at each intersection and shall
be located no more than 180 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access
road(s) frontage to an hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent
hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required. (CFC
903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix Ill-B).
69. As required by the California Fire Code, when any portion of the facility is in excess of 150
feet from a water supply on a public street, as measured by an approved route around the
extedor of the facility, on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire
flow shall be provided. For this project on site ire hydrants are required. (CFC 903.2)
70. Maximum cul-<le-sac length shall not exceed 1320 feet. Minimum turning radius on any cul-
de-sac shall be forty-five (45) feet. (CFC 902.2.2.2.3 and Subdivision Ord 16.03.020)
71. If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection pdor
to any building construction. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2)
72. Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have
approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent roads
are installed. Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface for
80,000 lbs. GVVV. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2)
73. Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved Fire
Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or any
portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be an all
weather surface designed for 80,000 lbs. GVW with a minimum AC thickness of .25 feet. (
CFC sec 902)
74. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than
twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13)
feet six (6) inches. (CFC 902.2.2.1)
75. The gradient for a fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed fifteen (15) percent. (CFC
902.2.2.6 Ord. 99-14)
76. Prior to building construction, dead end road ways and streets in excess of one hundred and
fifty (150) feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of
accommodating fire apparatus. (CFC 902.2.2.4)
77. Pdor to building construction, this development shall have two (2) points of access, via all-
weather surface roads, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 902.2.1 )
78. Pdor to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water
system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall be
signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature
block; and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. After
the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be presented to the Fire
R:\D P~2000\00-0397 Margarita Village Phase 4\Staf report PC 7-18-01.¢1oc
19
Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system including fire hydrants shall be
installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building
materials being placed on an individual lot. (CFC 8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and National Fire
Protection Association 24 1-4.1 )
79. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective Markers"
shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations. (CFC 901.4.3)
80. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, approved numbers or
addresses shall be provided on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be
plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Numbers shall be of a
contrasting color to their background. Commercial, multi-family residential and industrial
buildings shall have a minimum twelve (12) inches numbers with suite numbers a minimum
of six (6) inches in size. All suites shall gave a minimum of six (6) inch high letters and/or
numbers on both the front and rear doors. Single family residences and multi-family
residential units shall have four (4) inch letters and/or numbers, as approved by the Fire
Prevention Bureau. (CFC 901.4.4)
81. Pdor to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a directory display
monument sign shall be required for apartment, condominium, townhouse or mobile home
parks. Each complex shall have an illuminated diagrammatic layout of the complex which
indicates the name of the complex, all streets, building identification, unit numbers, and fire
hydrant locations within the complex. Location of the sign and design specifications shall be
submitted to and be approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau prior to installation.
82. Pdor to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on square footage and
type of construction, occupancy or use, the developer shall install a fire sprinkler system.
Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to
installation. (CFC Article 10, CBC Chapter 9)
83. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on a requirement for
monitoring the sprinkler system, occupancy or use, the developer shall install an fire alarm
system monitored by an approved Underwriters Laboratory listed central station. Plans shall
be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. (CFC Article 10)
84. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a "Knox-Box" shall be
provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six (6) feet in height and be located
to the right side of the main entrance door. (CFC 902.4)
85. All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates
obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry
system for emergency access by fire fighting personnel. (CFC 902.4)
86. Prior to final inspection of any building, the applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire
Department for approval, a site plan designating Fire Lanes with appropriate lane painting
and or signs.
87. Pdor to the building final, speculative buildings capable of housing high-piled combustible
stock, shall be designed with the following fire protection and life safety features: an
automatic fire sprinkler system(s) designed for a specific commodity class and storage
arrangement, hose stations, alarm systems, smoke vents, draft curtains, Fire Department
access doors and Fire department access roads. Buildings housing high-piled combustible
stock shall comply with the provisions California Fire Code Article 81 and all applicable
National Fire Protection Association standards. (CFC Article 81)
88. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, the developer/applicant
shall be responsible for obtaining underground and/or aboveground tank permits for the
R:\D P~.000\00-0397 Margarita Village Phase 4\Staf report PC 7-18-01.doc
2O
storage of combustible liquids, flammable liquids or any other hazardous materials from both
the County Health department and Fire Prevantion Bureau.(CFC 7901.3 and 8001.3)
Special Conditions
89. Prior to building permit issuance, a full technical report may be required to be submitted and
to the Fire Prevention Bureau. This report shall address, but not be limited to, all fire and life
safety measures per 1998 CFC, 1998 CBC, NFPA-13, 24, 72 and 231-C.
90. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final a simple plot plan and a
simple floor plan, each as an electronic file of the .DWG format must be submitted to the
Fire Prevention Bureau. Alternative file formats may be acceptable, contact fire prevention
for approval.
91. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Fire Code permit process and
update any changes in the items and quantities approved as part of their Fire Code permit.
These changes shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for review and approval per
the Fire Code and is subject to inspection. (CFC 105)
COMMUNITY SERVICES
93. Pdor to issuance of building permits or installation of street lights, whichever comes first, the
developer shall file an application with the TCSD and pay the appropriate energy fees related to the
transfer of said street lights into the TCSD maintenance program.
OTHER AGENCIES
92.
93.
94.
95.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Rancho California
Water District's transmittal dated October 18, 2000, a copyof which is attached.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Eastern Information
Center, Department of Anthropology, University of California, transmittal dated October 20,
2000, a copy of which is attached.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the County of Riverside
Department of Environmental Health's transmittal dated October 18, 2000, a copy of which is
attached.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Riverside County Flood
Control, transmittal dated December 1, 2000, a copyof which is attached.
By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above
Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance
with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be
subject to Planning Commission approval.
Applicant's Signature
Name printed
Date
R:\D P~2000\00-0397 Margarita Village Phase 4\Staf report PC 7-18-01.doc
21
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
STATEMENTS OF OPERATION
R:',D P'~.000~00-0397 Margarita Village Phase 4~Staff report PC 7-18-01.dcc
29
CITY OFTEMECULA
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 00-0397 (Development Plan)
EXHIBIT A VICINITY MAP
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - July 18, 2001
R:',D P',2000',00-0397 Margarita Village Phase 4~Staff report PC 7-18-01.doc 23
CITY OFTEMECULA
Project
Site
EXHIBIT B
DESIGNATION - SP-6 (Campos Verdes S_[3ecific Plan)
Project
EXHIBIT C
DESIGNATION -OP (Office Professional)
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 00-0397 (Development Plan)
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - July 18, 2001
GENERAL PLAN
R:~D P~2.000~00-0397 Margarita Village Phase 4\Staff report PC 7-18-01.doc
24
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 00-0397 Plan)
(Development
EXHIBIT D SITE PLAN
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - July 18, 2001
R:~D P~2000~00-0397 Margarita Village Phase 4~,Staff report PC 7-18-01.doc
25
CITY OFTEMECULA
E-ZZZ:
FRONTELEVA~ON
COURTYARD ELEVATION
EFt SII)E ELEVATION
RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 00-0397 (Development Plan)
EXHIBIT E
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - July 18, 2001
ELEVATION
R:~D P~2000~00-0397 Margarita Village Phase 4~Staff report PC 7-18-01.doc
26
CITY OFTEMECULA
IIIIlll IIIIIII I I/Ii IIIIIII IIIIIII
OUTSIDE ~ ELEVATION
COURTYARD ELEVATION
LE1;T$~E~.~/A~ON
RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 00-0397 (Development Plan)
EXHIBIT F
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE- July 18, 2001
R:~D P~2000~0-0397 Margarita Village Phase 4~Staff report PC 7-18-01 .doc
27
ELEVATION - TWO STORY
CITY OF TEMECULA
2&rife
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 00-0397 (Development Plan)
EXHIBIT G
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - July 18, 2001
LANDSCAPE
R:~D P~2000~00-0397 Margarita VJlJage Phase 4~Staff reporl PC 7-18-01 .doc
28