Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout050995 CC AgendaIn compliance with the Americana with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (909) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to enaure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104ADA TnJe II] AGENDA TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL A REGULAR MEETING COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER 30875 RANCHO VISTA ROAD MAY 9, 1995- 7:00 PM 5:30 PM - Closed Session of the City Council pursuant to Government Code Sectjoe: 1. 954956.8, CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR, Property: Bounded by Rancho California Road and Ynez Road, a portion of Assessor'a Pamel Number 944-330-006; NegotiBtjng perde: City of Tamecola and Kempor Real Estate Company: Under negotiation: Proposed sale of red property. 2. §54956.8, CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR, Property: Bounded by Margadta Road and Rancho California Road, Negotia~jng Pardes: City of Temecule and Kemper Real Estate Company: Under Negotiation: Purchase of property. 3. §54956.8, CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR, Property: 43106 Business Park Ddve; Negotiating pardes: City of Temecula and Grubb and EI~a; Under negotiation: ' pdce and terms of payment. At approximately 9:45 PM, the City Council will determine which of the remaining agenda items can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00 PM and may continue all other items on which additional time is required until a future meeting. All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 PM. CALL TO ORDER: Invocation: Flag Salute: Next in Order: Ordinance: No. 95-08 Resolution: No. 95-41 Mayor Jeffrey Stone presiding Bishop Konrad Lee, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Councilmember Parks ROLL CALL: Lindemans, Muftoz, Parks, Roberrs, Stone PRESENTATIONS/ PROCLAMATIONS Water Awareness Month Mental Health Month PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 30 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Council on items that are not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council on an item not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink 'Request to Speak' form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items a 'Request to Speak' form must be filed with the City Clerk ~ the Council gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made at this time. A total, not to exceed, ten (10) minutes will be devoted to these reports. CONSENT CALENDAR 2 Standard Ordinance Adootion Procedure RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the minutes of April 11, 1995. 2.2 Approve the minutes of April 19, 1995. 2.3 Approve the minutes of April 25, 1995. 3 4 5 6 7 Resolution Aoorovina List of Demands RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 95- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A City Treasurer's Reoort RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Receive and file the City Treasurer's Report as of March 31, 1995. Contract for Audit Services for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30.1995 RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Approve a one-year extension with Moreland and Associates to provide audit services for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1995. Extension of Banking Services RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Approve a two-year extension with First Interstate Bank to provide banking services through June 30, 1997. "Please Save Lives - Don't Drink and Drive" Sian Prooram RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Approve the "Please Save Lives - Don't Drink and Drive" sign program proposed by the Temecula Community Partnership. 8 9 Acceptance of Public Improvements in Parcel Mao No. 22629 RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 Accept the public improvements in Parcel Map No. 22629; 8.2 Authorize reduction in Faithful Performance Security amounts for the improvement of streets and drainage; 8.3 Authorize the release of the Subdivision Monumentation security amount; 8.4 Direct the City Attorney to prepare reconveyance documents; 8.5 Direct the City Clerk to so notify the Developer. Suoolement No, 006 to Local Aoencv - State Apreement for Federal Aid Project No. STPLN-5459, I-15/I-215 Corridor Study RECOMMENDATION: 9.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 95- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING SUPPLEMENT NO. 006, TO LOCAL AGENCY AGREEMENT NO. 08-5459, BETWEEN THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR FEDERAL AID PROJECT NO. STPLN-5459, I-15/I-215 CORRIDOR STUDY 10 Summary on the Interim Fire Station RECOMMENDATION: 10. 1 Receive and file the summary for the interim Fire Station located at Linfield School. COUNCIL BUSINESS 11 City Attornev Service Analysis RECOMMENDATION: 11.1 Approve continuation of contract City Attorney services; 11.2 Approve retaining Peter Thorson and Burke, Williams and Sorenson, as the City Attorney. R:W~enda%060ll6 4 CITY MANAGER'S REPORT CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: May 2:3, 1995, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, :30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. R:~e~ende~O~OII6 6 TEM;CULA COMMUNIT~Y'Si:RVICr:S ;:DISTRICT'M;ETINn.i;:.'(To.'be':: held at 78':00) : 4*4~e~4v~4*e~e~e:e~e~e4e~4HH~:~v~HH~ei~:~eee~e~ee~ee~e:~e~e~e~ee~e~e~ee.~e~e~ :" "....:. :..~.::..:'..:~.· ....:.:.::. ....· .:.:':: .:..?.:.~. '. .... .....:".'..~ ......· ...... Ne~ in Order: Resoldion: No. CSD 95-02 CALL TO ORDER: CALL TO ORDER: President Ronald H. Robe~s ROLL CALL: DIRECTORS: Lindemans, Muf~oz, Parks, Stone, Roberrs PUBLIC COMMENT: A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Board of Directors on items that are not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Board of Directors on an item not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items e "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk before the Board of Directors gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors, should present a completed pink "Request to Speak" to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address for the record. CONSENT CALENDAR I Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of April 11, 1995. 1.2 Approve the minutes of April 25, 1995. DISTRICT BUSINESS 2 TCSD Prooosed Rates and Charaes for FY 1995-96 RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. CSD 95- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ON THE FILING OF A REPORT ON THE PROPOSED RATES AND CHARGES FOR FISCAL YEAR 1995-96 AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING IN CONNECTION THEREWITH 2.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. CSD 95- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AMENDING THE PROCEDURES FOR APPEALING THE APPLICATION OR IMPLEMENTATION OF RATES AND CHARGES AGAINST PROPERTY WITHIN THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 3 Naming of Park and Recreation Facilities RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Consider, and if desired, approve the names of two (2) quarter-acre park sites, two (2) three-acre neighborhood park sites, and a twenty (20) acre community park site. GENERAL MANAGERS REPORT - Bradley DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT - Nelson BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS ADJOURNMENT: Next meeting: May 23, 1995, 8:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. TEMECULA:.RPDFyFLOPMENT AGENCY MFI:TINR CALL TO ORDER: CALL TO ORDER: ROLL CALL: Next ~ Order: Resolution: No. RDA 95-04 Chairperson Ronald J. Parks presiding AGENCY MEMBERS: Lindemans, Mu~oz, Roberts, Stone, Parks PUBLIC COMMENT: A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Redevelopment Agency on items that are not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Agency on an item not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink 'Request to Speak' form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items a 'Request to Speak' form must be filed with the City Clerk before the Agency gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. CONSENT CALENDAR I Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of April 11, 1995; 1.2 Approve the minutes of April 19, 1995; 1.3 Approve the minutes of April 25, 1995. AGENCY BUSINESS 2 Consideration of Soonsorshio for All Women's Rodeo RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Consider sponsoring the All Women's Rodeo hosted by Pro Rodeo Sports Company of Temecula Valley to be held at Galway Downs on May 20 and 21, 1995. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT AGENCY MEMBER'S REPORTS ADJOURNMENT: Next Meeting: Temecula, California. May 23, 1995, 8:00 PM, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, R:V~gende%O6Oll6 I PROCLAMATIONS/ PRESENTATIONS The City of Temecula PROCLAMATION W~, Water Awareness Month is designated to raise the public's understanding of water distribution, quality and conservation, and to instill the importance of wise water use; and WH~:uEAS, continued cmse~vation by all cit~-ens is an essential aspect of maintaining an adequate water supply now and into the twenty-fh-st century; and Wl!~wl~-AS, there is an increa,~ng recognition of the interdependence of urban, agricultural and environmental water users; and WHEuEAS, the Rancho California Water District and Eastern Municipal Water District who serve the greater Temecula area consisten~y work with the ~kssocistlon of California Water Agencies, the California State Department of Water Resources, the California Water Awareness Committee and other water agencies to increase water awareness; NO W, THEREFORE, I, Jeffrey E. Stone, on behalf of the City Council of the City of Temecula, hereby proclaim the month of May to be, "Water Awareness Month" IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City of Temecula to be affixed this 9th day of May, 1995. Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk The City of Temecula PROCLAMATION WHEatRAkS, millions of Americans, incl~g children, may expexicnce a mental disorder at some point during their lives and may suffer devastating consequences as a result; and ~. WIiI~,EAS, Americans recognize that comprehensive and accessible mental healthcare services in their communities can effectively treat many disorders; and Wtm m~'itl~AS, the guiding principles of community mental healthcare have always been comprehensiveness, cost-efficiency, effective management, high quality and consumer-responsive services, and those principles are now being adopted by private and public healthcare agencies; and WHKREAS, suite, local and federal governments continue to struggle with ways to ensure all Americans who need physical and behavioral healthcare services can receive the help they need; NOW, T!~ZRI~-FORE, I, Jeffrey E. Stone, on behalf of the City Council of the City of Temecula, hereby proclaim the month of May to be, wlVlental Health Month" and call upon the citizens, public and private institutions, businesses and school in Temecula to commit to a vision for community mental healthcare through education, volunteerism and IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City of Temecula to be affixed this 9th day of May, 1995. Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk ITEM 1 ITEM 2 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL HELD APRIL 11, 1995 A regular meeting of the Temecula City Council was called to order at 7:02 PM at the Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rsncho Vista Street, Temecula, California. Mayor Jeffrey E. Stone presiding. PRESENT 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Lindemans, Muf~oz, Parks, Stone, Roberrs ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None Also present were City Manager Ronald Bradley, City Attorney Peter M. Thorson, and City Clerk June S. Greek. PLEDGE OF ALl EGIANCE The audience was led in the pledge of allegiance by Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans. PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS Mayor Stone proclaimed April 22, 1995 to be "Health Fair Expo '95 Day. Tomi Arborgast received the proclamation. Dan Dredla and Larry Hurst, representing the California Society of Municipal Financial Officers, presented two awards to Mayor Stone as follows: Award of Outstanding Financial Reporting for 1993-94 - Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) and a Budget Award. Mayor Stone presented Special Achievement Awards to members of Cub Scout Pack 337 for earning their Arrow of Light awards; James Tonkins, Erik Kalan, Darrel Knight, Daniel Murphy, Dana Secor, Aaron Falls, Miles Ortiz, Christopher Carey, Dale Fletcher and Matt Salmi. Mayor Stone proclaimed April 23, 1995 to be "Santa Margarita River and Creeks Celebration Day." Lee Backstrand of U.R.G.E. and Norms LaMadrid of the Nature Conservancy received the proclamation. Mayor Stone proclaimed April 23, 1995 to be "Serena's Song Week in Temecula." Michelle Harris, General Manager of the Balloon and Wine Festival, Randy Fleming, Chairman, Melody Brunsting, Public Relations Director and Steve Art of Sharp Healthcare who are the official sponsors of Serena's Song received the proclamation. PUBLIC COMMENTS Kay Cassaro, 31616 Paseo Goleta, re~luested that the Overland Overpass received top priority on the City's Capital Improvement Projects. City Clerk Greek read a letter into the record from Mr. Carl Hanover. Minutes%4%11 ~95 -1 - 05/02/95 CiW Courtoil Minutes ADHI 11, 1995 CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Councilmember Parks addressed Ms. Caesaro's comments regarding the Overland Bridge stating it has been a priority of the Council for the last five years and $2,000,000 have been expended on design and land acquisition. Councilmember Roberts reported that the Western Bypass has been designed to divert traffic from Winchester and Rancho California Road. He explained this is one part of the overall plan to move traffic smoothly. Mayor Stone explained the Overland Overcrossing is a $14 million dollar expenditure which is linked to development in Temecula. He also stated the City is working with the State to obtain funding. He also stated the neighboring Indian Reservation is building a casino and concerns have been expressed by neighbors that since a management company is not being used, they may be exempt from the BIA approval process and the National Environmental Protection Act. City Attorney Thorson reported the tribe will need to go through the NEPA process. Mayor Stone asked if any dialog has been started? City Manager Bradley reported that he has been assured that when this project is brought forward, the City will have the opportunity to discuss their concerns. Councilmember Roberts reported that as the liaison with Pechanga Tribe, he understands the casino will be very small and a news conference will be held shortly. After that point, he reported the Pechanga Tribal Council has indicated it will be happy to work with the City. CONSENT CALENDAR Councilmember Roberts requested the removal of Item No. 9 from the Consent Calendar. Mayor Stone corrected the minutes of March 14, 1995, stating the recommendation regarding maintenance of unpaved streets was made by Councilmember Muffoz. It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans to approve Consent Calendar Items 1-8 and 10 and 11 with a correction on Item 2.2. The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: 5 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: Lindemans, Muf~oz, Parks, Roberts, Stone None None Minutes%4%11%95 -2- 06/02/95 ~ City Council Minute April 11.1995 e Standard Ordinance Adootion Procedure 1.1 Motion to waive the reading included in the agenda. Minutes 2.1 2.2 2.3 of the text of all ordinances and resolutions Approve the minutes of February 28, 1995. Approve the minutes of March 14, 1995, as corrected. Approve the minutes of March 21, 1995. Resolution ADoroving List of Demands 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 95-33 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT .A City Treasurer's Report 4.1 Receive and file the City Treasurer's Report as of February 28, 1995. Award Bid to Construct a Protected Left-Turn Lane on Ynez Road at Tierra Vista Road RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Award a bid to construct a protected left-turn lane on Ynez Road at Tierra Vista Road to Del Rio Contractors, the lowest responsible bidder, for the sum of $12,170.00. Release Traffic Signal Mitigation Bond in Tract No. ~6861-F 6.1 Authorize the release of Traffic Signal Mitigation Bond in Tract No. 26861-F, and Direct the City Clerk to so notify the Developer and Surety. Minutee%4~11 ~95 -3- 05/02/95 City Council Minute ADril 11, 1995 ~ e e Acceptance of Public Streets into City-Maintained Street System (Within Parcel MaDs No. 23561-1. 23561-2. and 23624) 7.1 Adopt a resolution emitled: RESOLUTION NO. 95-34 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY MAINTAINED-STREET SySTEM (WITHIN PARCEL MAPS NO. 23561-1,23561- 2 AND 23624) All-Way "Stoo" - Pala Road at Loma Linda Road 8.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 95-35 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF ESTABLISHING 'STOP SIGNS" THE CITY OF TEMECULA 10. Reduction in Imorovement Bonds Amounts in Parcel MaD No. ~ 1383 10. 1 Accept the street, drainage, water and sewer improvements in Parcel Map No. 21383; 10.2 Authorize the release of Faithful Performance and Labor and Material Bonds for Street, Drainage, Water, and Sewer improvements, and the Subdivision Monument Bond; 10.3 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Surety. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 11. Second Reading of Ordinance No. 95-07 11.1 Adopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 95-07 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING CHAPTER 2.04 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO THE TIME AND PLACE OF CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS Mirmtee~4'd 1~95 -4- 05/02/95 /,_.. CiW Council Minute Aorll 11, 1995 9 Solicitation of Construction Bids for the Parkview Site Rough Grading and Imorovements. Project No. PW93-09 Councilmember Roberrs stated he has had communication with the Lutheran Church, and understood grading plans have been revised a number of times. He asked that the MOU between City and church be followed and requested that this project move forward at a faster pace. Councilmember Parks announced he has a conflict of interest on this item and will abstain from the vote. It was moved by Councilmember Roberrs, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans to approve staff recommendation as follows: 9.1 Approve the Project construction plans and specifications; 9.2 Authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit public construction bids for the rough grading improvements for a portion of the Parkview Site, Project No. PW93-09. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Lindemans, Mufioz, Roberts, Stone 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None I COUNCILMEMBERS: Parks COUNCIL BUSINESS 9. School Mitioation Resolution Councilmembers Muf~oz and Parks announced a conflict of interest and stepped down from the dies. Planning Director Gary Thornhill introduced Associate Planner David Hogan who presented the staff report. Kenneth Ray, 31647 Pio Pico Road, spoke in favor of the resolution. Rod Henway, 3600 Lime Street, No. 221, Riverside, representing the Building Industry Association of Riverside County, spoke in opposition to the Resolution. He stated if the City feels fees need to be increased, it should consider using the San Jose Ordinance as a model. He recommended the following changes: Minutes%4~. 11%95 -5- 05/02/95 City Council Minutes April 11, 1995 P. 11, Item 3A.6 - eliminate the phrase total mitigation. P. 12, Item 4 - process for City Council approval. As read there is no legally defensible reason for denying. Add grounds to make a finding to reject the mitigation plan. P. 13, - mitigation agreement not be required to be implemented at the time the application is submitted, but toward end of project. · A process for resolution of impasse be added. · Add a refund provision. · Require annual review of plan, updated to reflect legislative changes, building trends and costs of construction. · Provide for an amendment process in case State makes changes. Councilmember Roberrs asked why these concerns were not addressed earlier. Mr. Hanway stated he sent a three page letter to the Superintendent of Schools and the City Councilmembers, proposing a wide range of options. He said as of this date he has not received a response to his letter. Dennis Chiniaeff, 27555 Ynez Road, No. 202, spoke in opposition of the resolution and suggested if the resolution is adopted, that the City Council give direction to the School District on what kind of percentage the City Council is willing to accept. Dr. Pat Novotney, School Superintendent, 37433 Avenida Japala, spoke in support of the resolution, listing quality schools as the goal of the District. Councilmember Robarts stated he has a problem with Section 5(C2), page 15 and would like it stricken. He stated he does not believe new development should be burdened with 100% mitigation. However, he added he feels the resolution needs to be adopted so that discussions may proceed. Mayor Stone stated he agrees that Section 5C2 should be stricken with the following language added: "shall be the full and complete responsibility of the District. To that end the District shall indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless the City against any loss, cost, expense, claim, damage, settlement or judgement resulting from a lawsuit or any part thereof pertaining to the contents of this resolution." Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans asked that a sentence be added that mitigation will not be 100%. Mayor Stone stated he would give his personal commitment that he would not support 100% mitigation. City Attorney Thorson stated Mr. Alhadeff suggested language on page 3 of his redlined version, No. 3, that would indicate the plan would not adequately address impacts if it imposes 100% of the costs of meeting such impacts on new residential developments. Mr. Thorson recommended this be addressed during development of Minutes\4~,l 1%95 -6- 05/02/95 ~ CiW Council Minute April 11.1995 the mitigation plan, when Council has a factual basis to determine what the percentages should be. He indicated this would be a more defensible decision. It was moved by Councilmember Robarts, seconded by Mayor Stone to approve staff recommendation as amended in Section 5C on Page 14 and with the elimination of Section 5-C2 on Page 15 of the resolution. 12.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 95-36 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF APPROVING THE SCHOOL FACILITY IMPACT MITIGATION PROGRAM The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: 3 COUNCILMEMBERS: Lindemans, Roberrs, Stone NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: 2 COUNCILMEMBERS: Muftoz, Parks TEMECULA RECESS Mayor Stone called a recess at 8:34 PM. The meeting was reconvened following the previously scheduled Community Services District and Redevelopment Agency Meeting at 9:11 PM. 10. Prooosal for Installation of Flashino Warnin; Liohts in the Vicinity of Temecula Schools (Requested by Mayor Stone - Continued from the meeting of 3128t95) Public Works Director Joe Kicak presented the staff report. Councilmember Muf~oz asked that discussions with the Temecula Valley Unified School District regarding cost sharing on the project be explored. Public Works Director Kicak stated he believes there is a willingness to consider this on the part of the School District and he will pursue it. Councilmember Robarts questioned the location of two signals at Sparkman Elementary School. He suggested that two signals on Pio Pico Road are not as critical as placing them on La Serena Road for the Rancho Elementary School. Minutee~4%11 ~,95 -7- 05/02/95 CiW Council Minutes Auril 11, 1995 RECESS Mayor Stone called a recess at 9:20 PM to change the tape. The meetinD was reconvened at 9:21 PM. Councilmember Parks asked if this item has been reviewed by the Public/Traffic Safety Commission. Public Works Director Kicak stated Council directed this item be placed directly on the Council agenda. +- Mayor Stone stated he does not have a problem with the Commission reviewing this item, however he is worried about the safety of school children. It was moved by Mayor Pro Tam Lindamans, seconded by Councilmember Parks to continue this item for 30 days to allow the Public/Traffic Safety Commission to review this proposal as well as to allow staff to pursue shared funding with the School District. The motion was unanimously carried. Hearing no objections from the Council, Mayor Stone reordered the agenda to hear Item No. 17. 17. Traffic Control Winchester Road at Jefferson Avenue and I-15 On/Off Ramos Public Works Director Joe Kicak presented the staff report. Councilmember Roberts questioned the need for two officers at Winchester & Jefferson. Councilmember Mufioz questioned the feasibility of the program based on saturated capacity of the intersection. Public Works Director Joe Kicak suggested using police officers to test the program. Patricia H. Birdsall, 41540Avenida Barca, made the following suggestions: One, better enforcement of traffic signals so that cars do not block the intersection; and two, using cones to allow for two lanes in the direction the traffic is most congested, depending upon the time of day. She stated that this method has been very successful in Hawaii. She expressed concerns regarding the safety of traffic directors, especially during the winter months when lighting is an issue. It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Robarts to approve staff recommendation with direction to the City Attorney to place a clause in the agreement that allows the contract to be terminated, if after a trial period it is shown to be unsuccessful. Further direction was given to refer this program to the Public/Traffic Safety Commission for periodic review and monitoring. Minuteg%4%11Lq5 -8- 05/02/95 /~- Ciw Council Minute ADHI 11. 1995 17.1 Authorize the City Manager to enter into an agreement to provide Traffic Control Officers at Winchester road at the intersections of Jefferson and I-15 easterly and westerly one/off ramps, subject to review and approval by the City Attorney. 17.2 Transfer $11,880from General Fund Unreserved Fund Balance and appropriate it in Public Works Traffic Division Account No. 100-164-602-5250 "Other Outside Services." The motion was unanimously carried, Public Works Director Joe Kicak stated the execution of this contract will depend on the ability of the Company to provide the required insurance. Councilmember Parks stated he would like the City to assist the contractor in obtaining insurance if possible. 14. Overland Drive Overcrossina - Status Report (Continued from the meeting of 3/28/95) Councilmember Muf~oz stepped down due to a conflict of interest. Public Works Director Joe Kicak presented the staff report, It was moved by Mayor Pro Tern Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember Roberrs to receive and file the report. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Lindemans, Parks, Robarts, Stone NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Muf~oz Staff was further directed to follow up with Edison on how quickly utilities can be relocated so that construction can proceed with the Overland bridge. It was moved by Councilmember Robarts, seconded by Councilmember Parks to extend the meeting until 10:15 PM. The motion was unanimously carried. Mayor Stone announced that consideration of a funding request from Riverside County Child Care Consortium would not be heard at this meeting, however the request by Operation School Bell would be discussed. MinuTes~4%11 ~,95 -9- 05/02/95 CiW Council Minutes April 11.1995 ,~ 11. Street Maintenance and/or Constr, ction of Unoaved Streets (Continued from the meeting of 3128/95) Mayor Stone excused himself due to a conflict of interest. Public Works Director Joe Kicek presented the staff report. Councilmember Mufioz asked if this would in any way put the CSD funding at risk. City Attorney Thorson stated that road maintenance is not a capital outlay, therefore funding would not be at risk. Councilmember Mufioz stated this program was originally designed to respond to the emergency needs of residents and was never intended to be a permanent solution. He stated he feels if property owners are not willing to fund improvements, the City should stop maintaining the roads. Councilmember Parks suggested approaching property owners on cost of grading the roads four times of year. Councilmember Roberts asked if the City begins maintaining these roads and then is unable to continue, would the City carry any kind of liability. City Attorney Thorson stated that that if the decision were made in the dry months as a policy decision, the City would not be responsible. It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Mufioz to direct staff to establish the benefit zones and fees for emergency maintenance to be assessed under TCSD Service Level R. The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Mu~oz, Lindemans, Parks, Roberts NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: I COUNCILMEMBERS: Stone Director of Community Services Shawn Nelson explained there may be · timing issue with levy of this assessment for implementation this year. RECESS Mayor Stone called a brief reconvened at 10:22 PM, recess at 10:21 PM to change the tape. The meeting was IVinutee%4~ 11%95 - 1 O- 05/02/95 ,~- Citv Council Minute April 11, 1995 16. 18. 19. Community Services Fundins Prosram (Continued from the meeting of 3/28/95) Assistant City Manager Mary Jane McLamey presented the staft report. It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans to continue consideration of the Riverside County Child Care Consortium and approve the $1,000 funding Grant for the Assistance League Operation School Bell. The motion was unanimously carried. Real Property Transfer Tax City Manager Ronald Bradley presented the staff report. Councilmember Mufioz asked if there is any value to obtaining an Attorney General's Opinion on this issue. City Attorney Thorson stated the Attorney General's opinion still carries no guarantees. He indicated an opinion of the legislative council can go quickly, however the Attorney General's Opinion takes longer. .' It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember Parks to receive and file the report with direction to the City Attorney to pursue an opinion of Legislative Counsel on this matter. The motion was unanimously carried. Reouest for City Council Suooort of the Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG) Position on the Reauthorization of the Federal Endangered Species Act Planning Director Gary Thornhill presented the staff report. Rod Hanway, 3600 Lime Street, No. 221, Riverside, representing the Building Industry Association, spoke in favor of staff recommendation. It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Muftoz to approve staff recommendation. 19.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 95-37 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA SUPPORTING AMENDMENTS TO THE FEDERAL ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT The motion was unanimously carried. Minutee%4~11 ~95 -11- 05/02/95 Citv Council Minutes April 11.1995 CITY MANAGER'S REPORT City Manager Bradley reported that tomorrow, April 12th, traffic signals will be turned on at Nicolas & Winchester. Additionally, signals will be activated on Thursday, April 13th, at Margarita Road and Avenida Barca and on 79S, the right turn lane at Pale Road has been completed and is operational. Councilmember Mufioz suggested a ribbon cutting for traffic signals, especially at the Nicolas and Winchester intersection. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT None given. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Councilmember Roberts, seconded by Councilmember Parks to adjourn at 10:43 PM to e Joint Council, RDA, Planning Commission Meeting on April 19, 1995, 7:00 PM, Rancho California Water District Board Room, 42135 Winchester Road, Temecula, California. The motion was unanimously carried. Next regular meeting: April 25, 1995, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor ATTEST: June S. Greek, CMC City Clerk Minutee~,4~l 1 ~95 -12- 05/02/95 MINUTES OF A JOINT MEETING OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL/TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND THE TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION HELD APRIL 19, 1995 A joint meeting of the Temecula City Council, Redevelopment Agency and the Temecula Planning Commission was called to order in the Board Room of the Rancho California Water District at 7:04 PM, Mayor Jeffrey E. Stone presiding. PRESENT 4 ABSENT: 1 PRESENT: 4 ABSENT: I COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: Mutioz, Parks, Robarts, Stone Lindemans Fahey, Ford, Slavin, Webster Blair Also present were City Manager Ronald E. Bradley, City Attorney Peter Thorsen, Planning Director Gary Thornhill and City Clerk June S. Greek. PL;:DGI: OF AI LI:tqANCI: The audience was led in the Pledge of Allegiance by Commission Chairman Steve Ford. PUBLIC COMMI:NTS There were no public comments offered. COUNCIl/COMMISSION REPORTS Councilmember Parks requested the members of the audience, commission and council observe a moment of silent prayer for the victims of the Oklahoma City bombing tragedy. Councilmember Roberrs reported briefly on the on-going efforts to place traffic directors at the Winchester/Jefferson intersection and Winchester overpass. COUNCIL CONSRTT CALI:NDAR Substitute Public Imorovement Aoreement in Parcel Mao No. 91383 It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Robarts to approve the following staff recommendations: R:Velinutee%041996 -1- 06/02/96 City Coul'ldl MilluTel ADdl 19. 1995 1.1 Approve the substitute agreement for completion of street improvements in Parcel Map No. 21383. 1.2 Authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement and the City Clerk to so attest and have recorded. 1.3 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Surety. The motion was unanimously carried with Mayor Pro Tam Undemans absent. CITY COUNCIl/R;DI:VPLOPMENT AGI:NCY/PLANNING COMMISSION BUSINESS Status and Information Reoort on the Proposed Old Town Redevelooment Project and Performina Arts District The joint meeting of the Council, Agency and Commission was called to order by Agency Chairperson Ronald J. Parks. Agency Member Stone announced he would step down due to a potential conflict of interest. .- Planning Director Gary Thomhill introduced the staff report and outlined the matters to be covered during the workshop. Assistant Planner Matthew Fagin presented the Westside Specific Plan and the Master Conditional Use Permit for the Old Town Entertainment Project. Councilmember Mufioz questioned if the Master Conditional Use Permit is limited to the number of uses listed in the staff report. Planner Fagin responded that any additional uses would require another Conditional Use Permit. Councilmember Mufioz stated he objects to any high density residential in Area D of the Westside Specific Plan. Commissioner Webster asked if the architectural style proposed for the residential in Planning Area D will be compatible with that of the Hotel and Neighborhood Commercial Center. Planning Director Thornhill stated the architectural style would be required to be compatible at the time plans are submitted. Principal Engineer Ray Casey addressed the traffic conditions projected by the City'e traffic consultant. He advised that all intersections will be at equal or better levels of service, at build-out, compared to currently existing conditions. He also stated that one-half of the intersections show an improvement at build-out over the present level of service. Mr. Casey also outlined the locations of the proposed parking facilities. Commissioner Slavin asked if the use of parking structures versus parking lots had been explored. Engineer Casey responded that staff analysis showed this is not an economically viable solution. R:~Vlinutee~041995 -2- 05/02/95 City Cman~il Minute Amtl 19. 1995 Councilmember Roberts asked when the realignment of Front Street and the possible realignment of Pujol Street would be addressed with the City Council. Mr. Casey stated this could be done during the preliminary design phase. Councilmember Parks questioned the timing of the Murrieta Creek Channel improvements. Mr. Casey advised that the project does not have a responsibility to improve the creek to its ultimate solution. Councilmember Parks also questioned when the loop ramps at the I-15 and Highway 79 South intersection will be completed. Mr. Casey responded that this is projected to be completed by the year 2010. Councilmember Mu~oz asked if the land owners in the proposed Benefit Assessment District have been polled to determine their willingness to participate in the Western Bypass Parkway Assessment District. City Manager Bradley stated he was unable to respond regarding all of the possible owners. Associate Planner David Hogan presented the General Plan and Specific Plan Consistency and the Environmental Impact Report. Tom Dodson, the consultant who prepared the Environmental Impact Report, pointed out the comparable acreage between the General Plan and the Westside Specific Plan. Pat Fay, 31235 Calla Felicidad, spoke in favor of local contractors having the opportunity to be trained in how to bid on sub-contracts with Fluor Daniel. He recommended the City hold classes to show local contractors how to submit pre-bid qualifications, etc. Commissioner Slavin clarified that the City could act as a facilitator but would not fund such a training program. Commissioner Fahey discussed the need for the Planning Commission to be aware of the Council/Agency members goals and how they would like to have the Commission proceed with this project. Councilmember Mufioz said he would like the commission to look at Planning Area D of the Westside Specific Plan relative to the density designation. He also indicated he would like them to address his concern on the impact high density residential will have on the escarpment. He further stated he wants to insure the limits on the permitted uses in the Master Conditional Use Permit are established as the upper limits allowed for Old Town. Lastly, he said he feels the Highway 79 South and I-15 circulation and impacts of the improvements should be looked at as they will affect the southerly end of the City and neighboring communities. Commissioner Slavin expressed concerns with the paring needs of the project and stated she would like to see further consideration of the use of parking structures. Chairman Ford asked to have a breakdown of the dollars available to spend for parking R:~VinuteeV)41996 -3- 06/02/95 City Coundl Minute ,Af, ffi 19. 1996 structures at the present time and those that would be available to spend at a later date. Councilmember Robarts said he feels Planning Area D should be carefully studied as to the density issue and asked staff to keep the Council and Commission updated regarding possible realignments of Front and Pujol Streets. He also expressed concern that the signal and ramp widening at I-15 and Highway 79-South be completed prior to opening of the project. Councilmember Parks asked that the Agency and the Planning Commission have an open mind with regard to Area D and allow review of suggested designs before ruling out possible developments solely on the basis of density. He also suggested the development of Area D may result in tradeoffs which could expedite construction of the Bridge over Murriats Creek. Member Parks also shared in the concerns regarding timing of the I-15/Highway 79-South intersection signalization and ramp widening and agreed that some structural parking should be considered for the Old Town project. Commissioner Webster expressed concern that the area designated Tourist Retail may compete with the existing businesses located in Old Town. He further expressed a desire to assure the architectural styles of the Wild West Arena and the Hotel Complex are aesthetically compatible with the escarpment. Commissioner Fahey asked that the Council/Agency let the Planning Commission know how they should be communicating with the Council/Agency during the development of the project. Commissioner Slavin stated she is concerned that the publicized opening date not drive the project and stressed that attention to quality should be the driving force. Planning Director Thornhill, in response to a question from Councilmember Muftoz, stated the Master Conditional Use Permit is only for the project as proposed. He said staff is working on an ordinance that will restrict future entertainment facilities in the Old Town area. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Chairman Ford, seconded by Commissioner Slavin to adjourn to the next regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning Commission to be held May 1, 1995 at the Rancho California Water District Board Room. The motion was unanimously carried. It was moved by Councilmember Robarts, seconded by Councilmember Mufioz to adjourn to the meeting of April 25, 1995 to be held at the Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. R:tMinutee~O41995 -4- 05/02/96 City Council Minute ADHI 19. 1995 CITY MANAGFR RFPORTS No report given. CITY ATTORNEY REPORTS No report given. ATTEST: Ronald J. Parks, Chairman Temecula Redevelopment Agency June S. Greek, CMC City Clerk/Agency Secretary R:~Vlinutee~041996 -S- 05/02/95 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL HELD APRIL 25, 1995 A regular meeting of the Temecula City Council was called to order at 7:05 PM at the Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. Mayor Jeffrey E. Stone presiding. PRESENT: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Lindemans, Mufloz, Parks, Roberts, Stone ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None Also present were City Manager Ronald Bradley, City Attorney Peter M. Thorson and Deputy City Clerk Susan W. Jones. EXECUTIVE SESSION A meeting of the City of Temecula City Council was called to order at 5:37 PM. It was moved by Councilmember Roberta, seconded by Councilmember Muttoz to adjourn to Executive Session pursuant to Government Code Sections: 1. §54956.8, CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR, Property: Bounded by Sixth Street, Front Street and Mercedes, Negotiating parties; Edward and Kathleen Dool and the City of Temecula; Under Negotiation - Proposed Sale or Lease of City Owned Property. 2. §54956.8, CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR, Property bounded by Calle Empleado, Avenida de Vertas/Winchester Road; Negotiating parties City of Temecula and Professional Hospital Supply; Under Negotiation - Owner Participation Agreement. The motion was unanimously carried. Councilmember Parks joined the Executive Session at 6:05 PM. City Attorney Peter Thorson announced there was no closed session action to report. INVOCATION The invocation was given by Pastor Mike McNeff, Valley Christian Fellowship. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The audience was led in the flag salute by Councilmember Muttoz. R:~Mbueee~042616 -1- PUBLIC COMMENTS Kay Cassaro, 31616 Paseo Goleta, explained that she was back again to lobby for relief in the traffic jams on Winchester, which are intolerable. She has heard that it may be ten years before the Overland Bridge is built, because there just isn't enough money. She has read that the City Council is considering the purchase of · municipal golf course and performing arts center, yet there are no funds for the overpass, which must be low on .the City's priority list. She suggested a three-step program: 1) a hold on all new housing projects and major business construction until traffic congestion is a thing of the past; 2) construction of the Overland Overpass, and 3) the initiation of plans for an additional freeway on/offramp north of Winchester. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Councilmember Robarts reminded everyone that this is the weekend of the Balloon and Wine Festival; the first balloon glow is Friday evening. Mayor Pro Tam Lindemans read · prepared statement, which, he stressed, had nothing to do with the previous speaker. He referred to reading an interview with the City Manager regarding the Overland Bridge in ten years. He stated CFD 88-12 should pay for it after 750 square feet of retail space is rented in a regional center, which would take nine years. He also discussed the duck pond and the Temecula Country Club Golf Course. He stated that Council needs to get together to decide what the City's needs are; he stressed that he sees only one need, and that is solving a tremendous traffic problem. Mayor Stone spoke regarding the Oklahoma City disaster. An overhead was displayed providing an address where citizens could make · contribution to the Salvation Army, to be used exclusively for burials of victims. He said cannisters will also be set up at Costco, Kmart and Target and checks may be made payable to the City of Temecule. Donations will be collected on Monday, end the funds forwarded to the Salvation Army. Mayor Stone also paid tribute to a new business in the community called Valley Funeral Home; John Weissgiver, the Director, has donated two caskets, which he will send, at his expense, to help with this endeavor. Mayor Stone requested staff look into a process called spray filling to address filling potholes more quickly after storms. Mayor Pro Tam Lindemans asked that this item be placed on the next agenda. City Manager Bradley stated staff will bring it back to Council as quickly as possible. CONSENT CALI:NDAR Councilmember Muf~oz announced he would abstain on Items Nos. 8, 9 and 12, due to conflicts of interest. Councilmember Robarts asked if the funding on Item No. 13 is through CDBG or special assessment, and Director of Public Works/City Engineer Kicak answered it is from CDBG. It was moved by Councilmember Roberrs, seconded by Councilmember Parks to approve Consent Calendar Items 1-13. The motion was unanimously carried with Councilmember Mu~oz abstaining on Items Nos. 8, 9 and 12. I Standard Ordinance Adoption Procedure 1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. 2 Minutes 2.1 Approve the minutes of March 28, 1995. 3 4 Resolution Aoorovina List of Demands 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 95-38 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A Citv Treasurer's Statement of Investment Policy 4.1 Adopt the Treasurer's Statement of Investment Policy as proposed by staff which provides safety, liquidity and yield for City funds. Award of Contract for Weed Abatement Services 5.1 Approve an Award of Contract for weed abatement services on an as-needed basis to Don Dixon as primary, Rory Rieck as secondary and Smith Tractor and Bill Baldwin as alternates. 6 Records Destruction Aooroval 6.1 Approve scheduled destruction of certain records as provided under the City of Temecula approved Records Retention Policy. 7 Release of Fire Mitioation Bond in Tract ~6861-F 7.1 Authorize the release of Fire Mitigation Bond in Tract No. 26861-F; 7.2 Direct the City Clerk to so notify the Developer and Surety. 8 1-15/Winchester Road (Route 79N) Interchange Imorovements. Construction Coooerative Agreement with State Deoartment of Transportation 8.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 95-39 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT NO. 8-939, BETWEEN THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE WINCHESTER ROAD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Lindemens, Parks, Roberrs, Stone NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: I COUNCILMEMBERS: Mu~oz Release Imorovement Bonds for Plot Plan No. 10079 9.1 Authorize release of Faithful Performance end Labor and Material Bonds for Construction of access roadway for Plot Plan No. 10079 (Tower Plaza Office Building); 9.2 The motion carried by the following vote: Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Surety. AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Lindemans, Parks, Roberrs, Stone NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: I COUNCILMEMBERS: Mufioz 10 Comoletion end Prooram Accectance of Project No. PW94-13 - FY94-95 City Wide p.r-.C. Repair 10.1 Accept the FY94-95 Citywide P.C.C. complete and direct the City Clerk to: Repair Program, Project No. PW94-13 as File the Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a one (1) year Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract; Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after the filing of the Notice of Completion if no liens have been filed. 11 12 Comoletion end Acceotance of Project No. PW94-1 ~ - FY94-95 Slurrv Seal Project 11.1 Accept the FY94-95 Slurry Seal Project, Project No. PW94-12 as complete and direct the City Clerk to: File the Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a one (1) year Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract; Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after the filing of the Notice of Completion if no liens have been filed. Award of Professional Services Contract to Trans-Pacific Consultants for the Design of the FY94-95 Annual Pavement Manaaement Project No. PW95-06 12.1 Approve and authorize the Mayor to sign the Professional Services Agreement between the City of Temecula and Trans-Pacific Consultants R'PC) to provide Engineering Services for the design of the FY94-95 Annual Pavement Management Project - Project No. PW95-06 for an amount not to exceed $49,910.00. The motion carried by the following vote: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: AYES: 4 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 ABSTAIN: I Lindemans, Parks, Robarts, Stone None None Mufioz 13 Solicitation of Construction Bids and Aooroval of the Plans and Soecifications for the Handicap Access Ramo Imorovements. 'Project No. PW95-04 13.1 Approve the Plans and Specifications and authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit public construction bids for Project No. PW95-04, Handicap Access Ramp Improvements, PUBLIC HFARINGS 14 Public Nuisance Abatement- 30301 Nicolas Road Chief Building Official Tony Elmo presented the staff report. Councilmember Parks asked if several absentee owners could not get together to make a decision, or if the property is owned by a limited or general partnership; have the property owners been made aware of this hearing? Chief Building Official Elmo stated it was very difficult to get input from 811 seven property owners; staff is not aware of the type of partnership; notices have been sent to all owners through certified mail. Councilmember Robarts said when Council voted to place this item on the agenda he raised the issue of the large attorney fees and was told that he would receive a breakdown of these fees; he has not received a breakdown. City Attorney Thorson responded listing the number of notices and hearings required as a result of the multiple ownerships. He advised that the partners were in various parts of the country, as well as, just not cooperating. Mayor Pro Tam Lindemans questioned the $68,000 to clean-up all the concrete and steel on the property; was the metal sold for scrap and used to offset the $68,000, or was it all junk; does the $68,000 carry interest, as it becomes a lien on the property. Chief Building Official Elmo reiterated that those funds covered everything mentioned in the staff report, including boarding up the large warehouse building, which had the most worth; all other foundations, underground piping and other small outbuildings have been removed. Environmental Control Systems, Inc. took the metal and whatever they could recover through the recycling processes was given to them. In answer 'to Mayor Pro Tam Lindemans question regarding interest, City Attorney Thorson explained that, if it is not paid within the time period to pay the taxes on the property, it will take on the penalties under the property tax laws. Mayor Stone stated he received a couple of calls from residents who are concerned with the weeds, which are a fire hazard; he confirmed that staff will still maintain their examination of this property as time goes on. Chief Building Official Elmo said he would bring this concern to the attention of Code Enforcement. Councilmember Mu~oz stated the weeds are not being paid attention to as much as he might have them and asked if sign enforcement was being addressed vigorously? Chief Building Official Elmo advised that staff's concentration on weed abatement is a very intense, full-time job with one project employee involved and 1,200 parcels inspected and posted this year for inclusion on the tax rolls. Mayor Stone opened the public hearing at 7:25 PM. Hearing no requests to speak, the public hearing was closed at 7:25 PM. It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember Roberts to approve staff recommendation as follows: 14.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 9540 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING THE CITY'S COSTS OF ABATING THE PUBLIC NUISANCE AT 30301 NICOLAS ROAD, TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA AND DIRECTING THAT SUCH COSTS SHALL CONSTITUTE A LIEN AGAINST THE PROPERTY. 14.2 Direct that such costs be recorded against the property as a special assessment. The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Lindemans, Muf~oz, Parks, Roberts, Stone NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None COUNCIL BUSINI=SS 15 Reouest from Deoartment of Transoortation - Suooort to Divert ~300.O00from RSTP to CTAP Director of Public Works/City Engineer Kicak presented the staff report. Councilmember Parks Questioned if the purpose of this money is to train staff, as well as, members of the State in matters related to State highways. Director of Public Works Kicak explained that it is basically traffic safety open to staff members at a discount (40 to 100%). 16 Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans questioned the City's share of $11,799. Director of Public Works Kicak reiterated the total of $1 '1,799 represents the contribution from all of the Riverside County agencies. Mayor Pro Tam Lindemans requested that this item be sent back to staff to see where the full share of Riverside County's apportionment is and how much is the City's. City Manager Bradley explained that one-tenth of one percent is $300,O00,000at the Federal level; it is distributed all over the United States; RCTC receives $5.9 million; training accounts for the $11,799. He said it is proposed to use the $11,799 for other purposes. It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Robarts to direct staff to prepare the questionnaire from the State of California, Department of Transportation, expressing their support of Caltrans' continued diversion of $300,000 of local agency RSTP funds and $300,000 of State Highway Account funds for CTAP. The motion carried as follows: AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Mufioz, Parks, Robarts, Stone NOES: I COUNCILMEMBERS: Lindemans ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None Aooroval of Street Closure - May ~. 1995 Mayor Stone stepped down from the dais due to a conflict of interest. Director of Public Works/City Engineer Joe Kicak presented the staff report. He added that staff received a request from Temecula Productions to change the closure from 6:30 AM to 6:30 PM, as indicated in the staff report, to 5:00 AM to 3:00 PM. The closure would occur on Main Street between Pujol and Front Streets. Councilmember Robarts questioned staff as to why this request is coming before City Council; the City has requests for road closure permits consistently, which is at a staff level. City Manager Bradley explained that he has been informed that the Council has not adopted a policy giving staff authority to grant street closures; in most cities this is an administrative function that takes 24 hours at best. Councilmember Parks said he has been conversing with staff on how to implement a policy to come back to Council; once the policy is set, staff deals with the details. He asked if the businesses have been notified. Director of Public Works Kicak explained that the production company will notify the businesses. He informed Council that "TemporaryNo Parking" signs will be posted twenty- four hours ahead of time on Main Street, barricades at Front and Pujol Streets will be provided at 5:00 AM, adequate police control regarding traffic and provisions have been made for emergency vehicles. He continued that all departments have been involved in discussing this issue, which will help to make this closure run smoothly. City Manager Bradley reiterated that all of the Old Town merchants were notified by letter by the Old Town Main Street Merchants Association that the closure would occur pending City Council approval. Councilmember Parks stated he has no problem with the closure; he requested that we notify all of the residents on Pujol Street regarding access to the street and the need to use Rancho California Road. City Manager Bradley confirmed that this will be done. Councilmember Roberrs asked if staff wanted direction from the Council regarding an ordinance. City Manager Bradley asked for approval for this street closure and informed Council that staff will be bringing back a policy for Council's adoption. Councilmember Roberrs addressed the fact that in the meantime before this new policy comes to Council, if there is another request, perhaps Council should give direction of what to do until policy is approved. Steve Hasson, 6333 Canoga Avenue, Woodland Hills, CA, thanked Council for allowing him to address this issue; he indicated he is the Location Manager of the production company. He informed Council that his company will post "No Street Parking" signs 48 hours in advance. He asked if Council had any questions. Councilmember Muf~oz asked if the information he would be posting is in English and Spanish? Mr. Hasson answered he would speak with the City to see if someone could do the translation of a letter he would compose. Councilmember Muf~oz offered his assistance to Mr. Hasson. Jo Moulton, 41393 Avenida de la Reina, representing the Temecula Valley Film Council, reported on the benefits to the community from this kind of film production. Marvin Zeldin, 28659 Front Street, said the Old Town Main Street Association unanimously endorsed the filming project. R.-V,qb~eeeYM. Jtl~ It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Roberrs to approve staff recommendation as follows: 16.1 Authorize the closure of Main Street from Front Street to the westerly edge of the Main Street Bridge May 2, 1995 for film-making purposes. 16.2 The motion was carried by the following vote: Direct the Department of Public Works to issue a Special Event Permit for that purpose. AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Lindemans, Mu~oz, Parks, Roberts NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: I COUNCILMEMBERS: Stone Councilmember Parks requested that Council instruct staff to prepare an ordinance that' would allow staff in an administrative level to approve this type of event in the future. The request was approved by Council consensus. 17 Temecula Sister City Association Human Resources Administrator Grant Yates presented the staff report. Mayor Stone questioned staff if it is the goal of the Council to limit the number of Sister Cities to two? Administrator Yates responded that staff is not asking for direction as far as limiting the number of cities; staff is trying to provide a framework of the benefits, goals and objectives of the program. Mayor Stone reiterated that he feels this is something the Council should address; how many Sister Cities does Council want to patronize. Councilmember Parks explained that the Temecula Sister City Association is a separate entity from the City; the City participates in this association but its financial exposure is limited. He explained that money is spent for providing gifts and travel expenses of Councilmembers to a Sister City. He asked if a staff member is assigned to that association and questioned the cost. City Manager Bradley responded that his office handles liaison with the Sister City Committee, but it is primarily handled through Councilmembers Mu~oz and Roberts. He continued that limited staff time is expended on this project. In answer to a question from Mayor Stone regarding the budget allocation last year, Administrator Yates answered ~5,800 and the previous year it was $4,700. Mayor Pro Tam Lindemans reiterated the responsibilities of a sister city; this program is cultural, human and makes America "tick". RECESS Mayor Stone called a recess at 7:56 PM to change the tape. The meeting was reconvened at 7:57 PM. -' City Manager Bradley explained that limiting the number of cities that the City participates with is very appropriate. He will be meeting with the Mayor of Carcassone, France on May 24 in his office, at no cost to the City, but if Council desires not to continue discussions with that City, he will cancel the appointment. There was concensus of Council to proceed with Carcassone, France. Mayor Stone directed the report be received and filed. RECESS Mayor Stone called a recess at 8:00 PM. The meeting was reconvened at 8:10 PM. 18 Community Services Fundina Reauest (Continued from the meeting of 411 1 ~95) Assistant City Manager Mary Jane McLarney presented the staff report. Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans explained that he has met with Ms. Minkler of the Southwest County Child Care Council, at which time he asked if she could add one more item to their statement of purpose, that being they make a special effort for children whose parents simply cannot afford child care. He recommended increasing the amount to be granted by the City. Martha Minkler, representing the Southwest County Child Care Council, asked Council if they had any questions with regard to the allocation. She stated Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans' request is on the agenda for their Executive Board Meeting to be held tomorrow morning; the planned use for the money is to conduct a needs assessment to determine how many children are in need of child care in the area and how to best serve them. She said researching a scholarship program where they can assist children without the means for affordable child care is definitely within the scope of their mission. She thanked Council for their consideration. Councilmember Parks reiterated that this is a very worthwhile cause; he would like to know what is happening in our own community; he questioned the committee'slid of $1,000, and stated he would be open to increase that amount. It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans to grant $5,000, as requested, for child care services. Mayor Stone stated that part of their criteria was to develop an assessments needs and part of the pamphlet that will be created will help parents by giving them the tools to select propar child care providers. He explained that the committee thought this may duplicate information available through the Chamber of Commerce or the County. He continued that the City will be going through another round of community service funding in July, and if the City's allocations remain status quo, the City will have an extra $20,000. He asked to see some of the goals and criteria the organization is going to use, how they assess financial need and how those resources are going to be allocated. He noted he does not want to fund this aspect of the program at this time. Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans' motion died for the lack of a second. It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans, to allocate $2,500 for child care services to the Riverside County Child Care Consortium, and to request that this organization provide additional information as requested by Mayor Pro:Tem Lindemans. The motion was unanimously carried. DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS None given. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT None given. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT None given. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans to adjourn at 8:58 PM. The motion was unanimously carried with Councilmember Mufioz absent. Councilmember Mufioz was excused from the meeting at 8:47 PM. R:ilinuueiNilN -12- The next meeting of the Temecula City Council will be held on Tuesday, May 9, 1995, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor ATTEST: ' June S. Greek, City Clerk ITEM 3 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALIa)WING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE C1TY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A have been audited by the City Manager, and that the same are hereby allowed in the mount of $822,890.52. Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. APPROVEI) AND ADOFII~, this 9th day of May, 1995. ATTEST: Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk, CMC Resos el STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 95- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 9th day of May, 1995 by the following roll call vote: AYES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None COUNC~ERS: None June S. Greek, City Clerk, CMC Reeoe 61 CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS 04/20/95 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 04/27/95 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 05/09/95 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 04120/95 TOTAL PAYROLI~ TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 05109/95 COUNCIL MEETING: DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND: CHECKS: 001 GENERAL 100 GAS TAX 120 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FUND 140 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT 165 RDA-LOWIMOD 190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ (CIP) 220 MARGARITA ROAD REIMB. DIST. 250 CAPITAL PROJECTS - TCSD 280 RDA-CIP 300 INSURANCE 310 VEHICLES 320 INFORMATIONS SYSTEMS 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 340 FACILITIES 380 RDA-DEBT SERVICE 390 TCSD DEBT SERVICE PAYROLL: 001 GENERAL 100 GAS TAX 165 RDA-LOW/MOD 190 TCSD 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 280 RDA-CIP 300 INSURANCE 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 340 FACILITIES ,, ~~= ~~-- RONALD F_ BRADLEY, CITY MANAGER $ 80,508.34 125,861.04 503,395.56 113, 125.58 $ 822,890.52 262,733.25 33,485.51 0.00 0.00 257.61 54,298.99 3,454.15 471.42 32,409.42 0.00 153,386.38 0.00 0.08 119,508.53 37021 0.00 7,724.30 2,~98o80 13,211.07 0.00 0.00 $ 708,754.94 69,380.62 13,518.97 438.70 21,374.25 472.33 620.26 1,338.63 1,365.94 240.21 1,224.73 660.72 1,081.22 113,125.58 822,890.52 · HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. VOUCHRE2 0,~/20/~5 12:17 CITY OF TENECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE 7 FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 100 GAS TAX FUND 165 RDA DEV- L(:N/MOD SET ASXDE 190 COMHIJNXTY SERVICES DISTRICT 191 TCSO SERVICE LEVEL A 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 210 CAPXTAL/NPROVEHENT PROJ FUND 280 REDEVELOPHENT AGENCY - ]00 iNSURANCE FUND 320 ]NFORHATION SYSTEHS 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 340 FACILITIES TOTAL AICUNT 35,/~8./~ 13,340.03 142.82 11,713.72 1,583.95 278.28 982.40 74.91 4,013.94 2,~80.75 761.86 80,508.34 VOUCHRE2 t"""" '95 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUNBER 23214 425307 425307 425307 425307 425307 425307 425307 ~25307 425307 ~25307 ~25307 425307 /*25307 /*91311 /*91311 /*91311 J,e'q11 1 .11 691311 /*91311 /*91311 /*91311 /*91311 /*91311 /*91311 /*91311 /,91:311 /,91:311 691~11 ~91~11 /*91311 /*91311 /*91311 /*91311 /*91311 /*91311 23218 23219 23220 /232.21 12:17 CHECK DATE 04118195 04/20/95 04120195 0/*/20/95 04/20/95 04/20/95 04/20/95 04/20/95 04/20/95 04120195 04120195 04/20/95 04/20/95 04120195 0/,/20/95 04120195 04/20/95 04/20/95 04/20/95 04/20/95 04/20/95 04/20/95 04/20/95 04/20/95 04/20/95 04/20/95 04120195 04/20/95 04/20/95 04120195 04/20/95 04120195 04/20/95 04/20/95 04120195 04120195 04120195 04/20/95 0/*120195 04/20/95 04/20/95 04/20/95 04/20/95 04120195 VENDOR NUNBER 001~5 00~444 000~4 00~44 00044~ 000/~-44 O004z~ 000444 000664 000466 000444 0006/,6 000664 000644 000464 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 00028] 000283 00028~ 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 00028~ 000283 000283 001910 000781 VENDOR NAHE ASSISTANCE LEAGIJE OF TE FIRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (El)D) FIRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (El)D) FIRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS} FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX ([RS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) ACKERNAN, RALPH NqERITECH CONleJNICATION ASHLEY, TON) ASSDC OF ENVIRONNENTAL CITY OF TENEOULA V(XJCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS ITEN DESCRIPTION CAROUSEL OF CARING:R. ROBERTS O00~A~ SO I 0004~; SD I 000/~4 Si)] 0004~ STATE 0004~ STATE 0004~ STATE O00z~ STATE ~ STATE O00/*M, STATE 000/.4~ STATE 000642, STATE 000644 STATE O00/:,~t:, STATE 000~ STATE 000~4 STATE 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 00028] FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000285 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 MEDICARE 00028~ MEDICARE 000283 HEDICARE 000283 NEDICARE 000283 NEDICARE 000283 HEDICARE 000283 NEDICARE 000283 NEDIrA, RE 000283 NEDICARE 000283 NEDICARE 000283 HEDICARE 00028~ NEDIF. ARE REFUND FOR FORFEIT FEES RICOH COPIER YRLY !(A]NT CONTRA FORFEIT FEE REFIJI/DED NEHBERSHIP FOR DAVID HOGAN ACCOUNT NtJNBER 001-100-999-5260 001-2070 100-2070 190-2070 001-2070 100-2070 165-2070 190-2070 191-2070 193-2070 280-2070 300-2070 320-2070 :550-2070 :54,0-2070 001-2070 100-2070 165-2070 190-2070 191-2070 192-2070 193-2070 280-2070 300-2070 320-2070 330-2070 3~0-2070 001-2070 100-2070 165-2070 190-2070 191-2070 192-2070 193-2070 280-2070 300-2070 320-2070 530-2070 :54.0-2070 190-183-999-5380 3]0-199-999-5217 190-183-999-5380 001-161-999-527.6 ZTEH AHOUNT 100.00 29.28 6.00 58.52 2,829.57 571.69 10.77 551.50 16.76 8.91 /,5.86 35 °90 5,83 87.75 18.96 1) .64 10,/,14.42 2,177.53 2,636.92 /*9 ./,0 70.68 213.80 18.50 105.95 118./,6 2,517.87 1/, ,/.4 760.47 17.70 64.10 7.93 57.96 64 .S2 1,845.92 /*0.00 80.00 PAGE 1 CHECK: ANOUNT 100.00 /*,290.92 20,/,32.65 40.00 1,84.5.92 40.00 80.00 VOUCHRE2 (:)4./20/95 12:17 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR NUIeER DATE Nt.qqBER 23222 04/20/95 000122 23222 04/20/95 000122 23222 04/20/95 000122 23223 04/20/95 000622 2322A 04/20/95 23225 04/20/95 000154. 2.3226 04/20195 000127 23226 04/20/95 000127 23227 04/20/95 001195 23228 04/20/95 001723 23229 04/20/95 000137 23229 04/20/95 000137 23229 C)~/20/95 000137 232~0 04./20/95 00124.7 23231 04/20/95 23232 04/20/95 23233 04/20/95 23Z.~, 04/20/95 23235 04/20/95 23236 04/20/95 23237 04/20/95 23237 04/20/95 23238 04/20/95 001165 23239 04/20/95 2324.0 04/20/95 001701 04/20/95 000165 04/20/95 000165 04/20/95 000165 04/20/95 000165 04/20/95 001002 CITY OF TEHBCULA VOUCHERICHEC[ REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VENDOR IdAHE B S N SPORTS B S N SPORTS B S N SPORTS BANTA ELECTRIC-REFRIGER BETANCOURT, KIN CSNFO CALIFORNIAN, INC. 'LEGA CALIFORNIAN, INC. -LEGA CENTRAL SECURITY SERVIC CHACON, DAVID CHEVRON U S A ]NC. CHEVRON U S A INC. CHEVRON U S A INC. 001208 001535 CREEKSIDE TEXACO, iNC. 001915 CRESTE VERDE ESCRCYJ 001716 DANES ROOFING 001922 DILLOR TELEPHONE CONPAN 001(~9 DUNN EDHARDS CORPORATIO 001669 DUNN EDt,/ARDS CORPORAT]O ITEH DESCRIPTION PRO DOVN FIRST AID KIT TAX FREIGHT REPLACE HUHflING CONTACTOR SECURITY DEPOSIT REFUND CONF:95 LEGISLATIVE:G.RO6ERTS PUBLIC NOTICES (7771989wCI) PUBLIC NOTICES (777198~"C]) ENERG ALARH SERVICE t CRC TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS ACCOUNT NI.14BER 1~0-183-~9~-5310 190-183-999-5310 1~0-18~-~-5'310 )~,0-199-999-5212 190-2900 001-14.0-999-5258 001-120-999-5256 001-161-999-5256 190-182-~.~9-5250 190-18:5-999-5330 FUEL EXPENSE FOR CITY VEHICLES OO1-170-999-5262 FUEL EXPENSE FOR CiTY VEHICLES 001-162-~-5263 FUEL EXPENSE FOR CITY VEHICLES 001-161-~99-52~2 CITY-VIDE ELECTRONIC SY FIRE ALARN SYS REPAIR t SR CNT CLAREHONT, CITY OF pUB:CLAREHONTtS YOUTH RASTER P CRAFTSHEN PLUMBING HEAT HODULAR UNITS i INTERIN $TATIO VEHICLE HAINT. PUBLIC VORKS PER AGHNT WOOOL:ESCRO, J DEPOSI REPAIR LEAKING ROOF i SR CNTR APRIL & HAY PAYPHONE SERVS RECYCLED GRAFFITI PAINT TAX FUND RAISER FOR TEENS REFUND FOR FORFEIT FEES SKIPLOADER RENTAL EXPRESS HAIL SERVICES EXPRESS HAIL SERVICES EXPRESS HAIL SERVICES EXPRESS HAIL SERVICES 547'~ "" 0391 0180 KL (GAS) ENTERTAINMENT PUBLICATI ERNIE B'S ~I3RLDtS GREAT EXCEL RENTAL CENTER FEDERAL EXPRESS, iNC. FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. FIRST INTERSTATE BANK C 190 - 181 - 999-5250 190-180-999-5228 001 - 171-999- 54.70 100-164-604-5214. 280 - 1652 190-181-999-5212 320-199-999-5208 100-16~-601-5218 100-164-601-5218 190-18~-999-5320 190-183-999-5380 100-164-601-52:58 001 - 1~.0-999-5230 100-164-604-5230 001 - 120 -999- 5230 280-199-999-5230 001-1170 ITSH ANOUNT 198.00 15.35 21.~ 120.39: 100.00 119.64 ~.3o 127.38 156.00 1~.~ 27.97 11.95 200.00 10.00 700.00 54.2.98 1,000.00 4.00.00 1~..00 60.00 6,~ 19.50 23.00 19.00 PAGE 2 AHOUNT 235 · 13 120.39 100.00 152.9A 127.38 156.00 162.60 700.00 542.98 1,000.00 185.00 50.59 1/,/, .00 138.60 da.25 VOUCHRE2 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 23263 232/,4, 23265 23266 23266 23266 23Z68 23269 232/*9 0 2325 '1 23252 23252 23253 23253 23256 23255 23256 23256 23257 23258 23259 23259 23259 23259 12:17 CHECK DATE 04/20/95 04,/20/95 0/,/20/95 04/20/95 04,/20/95 06/20/95 06/20/95 04120195 04120195 04/20/95 04/20/95 04/20/95 04120195 04/20/95 04120195 04120195 04/20/95 04/20/95 04/20/95 04/20/95 04/20/95 04120195 04/20/95 04120195 04/20/95 04120195 04120195 04120195 04/20/95 04/20/95 04120195 04/20/95 04120195 04/20/95 04/20/95 VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER NAME 000170 FRANKLIN OUEST C014PANY, 000184. G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYN GILCHRIST, Ji14 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT GONZALEZ, JOHNNY 001609 GREATER ALAR14 COl4PANY, 000104 I C 14 A RETIREHENT TRUS 000104 I C 14 A RETIREMENT TRUS 00019/* I C 14 A RETIREHENT TRUS 00019/* I C t4 A RETIREHENT TRUS 00019/* I C 14 A RETIREHENT TRUS 000196 I C 14 A RETIREHENT TRUS 000196 [ C 14 A RETIREHENT TRUS 001629 INACOH ]NFORHATION SYST JOHNSTON, HOLLY 000206 KINKO'S OF RIVERSIDE, I 000206 KINKO'S OF RIVERSIDE, I 000209 L & 14 FERTILIZER, INC. 000209 L & 14 FERTILIZER, INC. 000965 L P S COMPUTER SERVICE 001865 N C I TELECOle4UNICATION 000396 HA]NTENANCE SUPERINTEND 000396 MAINTENANCE SUPERINTEND 001162 PARKHAN & ASSOCIATES 000220 HAURICE PRINTERS, INC. 000883 HONTELEONE EXCAVATING 000883 NONTELEONE EXCAVATING 000883. HONTELEONE EXCAVATING 000883 140NTELEONE EXCAVATING 000883 HONTELEONE EXCAVATING 000883 140NTELEONE EXCAVATING 000883 HONTELEONE EXCAVATING 000883 HONTELEONE EXCAVATING CITY OF TEI4ECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEH DESCRIPTION FRANIO..IN CALENDARS FOR 9A-95 909 699-8632 GEM REFUND FOR TC$O CLASS OFFICE SUPPLIES 141SC OFF/CE $UPPL]ES 141SC OFfiCE SUPPLIES REFUND FOR FORFEIT FEES PAY ALAR14 IIONITOR]NG-STORAGE 000104 DEF COMP 00019/, DEF CClIP 000196 DEF CONP 000104 DEF CaMP 00019/, DEF CORP 000196 DEF C014P 000196 DEF COMP SOFTMARE: THE PRINT SHOP REFUND FOR TCSD CLASS 2 COPIES OF lIESTERN BY PASS PRINTING AND PAPER NEEDS 14ISC SUPPLIES FOR PRK PAINT SHARPENING PAINT TOOLS CALL OUT SERVS POLICE DEPT LONG DISTANCE SERVS HEI4BERSHIP:J.KICAK & B.BURON 14EleiERSHIP:J.KICAIC & B.BURUN PAR 95 PROF GERVS-CALLE BYPASS NEIGHBORHOOD iTCH NEVSLETTER RAIN DAMAGE REPAIR MIK-KEARNEY RAIN DAMAGE REPAIR IItK-KEARNEY RAIN DAMAGE REPAIR iitK-DEL RAY RAIN DAIMGE REPAIR MRK-$OLANA RAIN DAleAGE REPAIR MRK-DIAZ RD RAIN DAMAGE REPAIR MtK-RANCHO RAIN DAHAGE REPAIR ON RANCHO V RAIN DAMAGE REPAIR I~RIC-DEL RIO ACCOUNT NLI4BER 001-161-f99-5220 320-1~9-~9-5208 190-18~-4992 001-162-999-5220 001-162-999-5220 : 001-160-f99-5220 lf0-183-~-5380 540-199-999-5230 001-2080 100-2080 190-2080 191-2080 192-2080 lf3-2080 34,0-2080 320-199-999-5~1 190-183-/.982 100-1(~.-60~-5250 190-180-~-5222 lf0-180-999-5262 100-1~4-&01-5218 320-1~-~-5215 320-199-999-5208 100-16~-601-5Z26 100-164-60&.-5226 100-1(~.-60~-5268 001-170-~-5222 IO0-1&A-&01-5/*02 100-1(~-601-5602 100-1(~.-601-5/,02 100-16~-601-5/*02 100-1(~4-601-5602 100-16/*-601 100-166-601 - 5/*02 100-16/*-601-5402 ITE14 MIOUNT 119.55 40.00 21 129.89 25.80 /*0.00 35.00 988.07 222.02 675.98 65.51 75.00 80.06 ?.2.50 90.13 35.00 35 .~6 32.16 289.~ 10.00 1,3Z0.92 10.00 30.00 170.00 ~80.00 3O7.75 631.00 307.75 2/,6.50 965.50 677.50 PAGE 3 '. CHECK ANOUNT 119,55 27.60 /*0.00 176.92 /*0.00 35.00 1,f29.1/* f0.13 35.00 67.~2 VOUCHRE2 061201~5 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUHBER 23259 23259 23259 23259 23259 25260 23261 23262 23262 23262 23262 23262 23262 23262 23262 23262 23262 23262 23262 23262 23262 23262 23262 23262 23262 23262 23262 23262 23262 23262 23262 23262 23263 23263 23263 23263 23263 23263 23263 23263 23263 23263 23263 23263 23263 12:17 CHECK DATE 04120195 04120195 04/20/95 04/20/95 04/20/95 04/20/95 04/20/95 04/20/95 04/20/95 04/20/95 04/20/95 04120195 04/20/95 04120195 04/20/95 04120195 04/20/95 04/20/95 04/20/95 04120195 04/20/95 04/20/95 04/20/95 04120195 04/20/95 04/20/95 04/20/95 04120195 04120195 04120195 04120195 04/20/95 04/20/95 04/20/95 04/20/95 04/20/95 04/20/95 04/20/95 04/20/95 04120195 04120195 04/20/95 04120195 04120195 04/20/95 VENDOR NUMBER 000883 000883 000883 00088~ 000883 000266 000246 00024.6 000246 000246 000266 000246 000246 000246 000266 000246 000246 000266 000246 000246 000246 0002~6 000266 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000246 000269 000269 000249 0002~9 000249 000249 000249 000269 000269 000249 000269 000269 000269 CITY OF TENECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION NONTELEONE EXCAVATING le3MTELEONE EXCAVATING MORTELEORE EXCAVATING NOIITELEORE EXCAVATING MOt/TELEORE EXCAVATING RAIN DAMAGE REPAIR WtK-PALA RD RAIN DAMAGE REPAIR VRK-CALLE C RA[N DAMAGE REPAIR IdRK-MARGARI RAIN DAMAGE REPAIR URK-LA PAZ RAIN DAMAGE REPAIR I/UC-PAUBA R NAPA CO. RESOURCE-CONSE k'KSHP:SANTA MARG RIVER:J.NETER PACIFIC AERICAN OULTUR SECURITY DEPOSIT REFUND PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PER REDE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS PET PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PER$ RE1' PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PEMS RET PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET PERS (EMPLOYEES' PETIRE 000246 PERS PET PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS PET PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS PET PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVO~ PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVO~ PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SIJRVIVOR PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMB. PETTY CASH REIMB. PETTY CASH REIMB. PETTY CASH REIMB. PETTY CASH REIMB. PETTY CASH REIMB. PETTY CASH REIMB. PETTY CASH PEIMB. PETTY CASH REIlI. PETTY CASH REIMB. PETTY CASH PEIII. PETTY CASH REIMB. PETTY CASH REIHO. ACCOUNT NUMBER 100-166 -601-5402 100-164-601-5402 100-164-601-5602 100-164-601-5602 100-164-601-5402 001-161-999-5238 190-2900 001-2130 001-2300 100-2300 165-2390 190-2300 191-2300 192-2390 193-2390 300-2390 320-2300 330-2390 :~0-2300 001-2390 1 O0- 2390 165-2390 191-2300 280-2390 300-2300 320-2300 330-239O 3z,0-2300 001 - 199-4070 001-100-999-5260 190-183-999-5330 001-140-999-5260 001-110-999-5260 320-199-999-5260 001 - 110-999-5258 190-180-999-5222 001-162-999-5230 190-180-999-5260 190-180-999-5220 001-100-999-5260 190-180-999-5220 ITEM AMOUNT 869.50 369.00 592.25 215.50 254.75 50.00 100.00 43.06 12,360.99 2,310.21 76.46 2,796o4~ 89.91 319.65 239.71 37.62 268.21 301.05 55.69 10.22 .23 13.4~ .42 1.~ .i'9 .23 .93 .93 9,00 10.00 35.52 32.50 31.09 26.Q0 36.37 60.93 38.76 6.31 7.78 16.16 PAGE CHECK M41XIT 6,210.00 50.00 100.00 19,129.51 312.36 23264 04/20/95 000253 POSTMASTER RENEV BULK RATE PERMIT #5 330-199-999-5230 20.00 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 23265 23265 23266 23266 23266 23267 23268 23268 23268 23268 23268 23268 23268 23268 23268 23268 23269 1 ,0 23271 23272 23272 23272 2327'3 23273 2327/, 23275 23275 23275 23275 23275 23275 23275 23275 23275 23275 23275 23275 23275 12:17 CHECK DATE 0/,120195 04120195 04/20/95 04/20/95 04/20/95 04/20/95 04/20/95 04/20/95 04/20/95 04/20/95 04/20/95 04/20/95 04/20/95 04/20/95 04120195 04120195 04/20/95 04120195 04/20/95 04/20/95 04/20/95 04/20/95 04/20/95 04/20/95 04/20/95 04/20/95 04/20/95 04/20/95 04/20/95 04/20/95 04/20/95 04/20/95 04/20/95 04120195 04120195 04/20/95 04/20/95 04/20/95 04120195 04120195 04120195 VENDOR NUMBER 00094,7 000947 000262 000262 000262 000426 001412 001412 001612 001612 001412 001412 001412 001412 001412 001612 001046 000353 000353 00043A 000645 0006~5 000645 OOO537 000537 001212 000375 000375 00O375 000375 000375 000375 OOO375 00O375 000311 00O375 0O0375 000311 00O375 000311 00O375 NANE RAMClIO BELL BLUEPRINT C RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C RANCHO CALIFORNIA MATER RANCHO CALIFORNIA MATER RANCHO CALIFORNIA MATER RANCHO INDUSTRIAL $UPPL RECREGNICS, INC. RECREONICS, ]NC. RECREON]CS, INC. RECREON]CS, INC. RECREONICS, INC. RECREON]CS, ]NC. RECREON]CS, INC. RECREON]CS, INC. RECREONICS, INC. RECREONIC$, INC. REXOR, FREEDMAN, KLEPET RIVERSIDE co. AtJDITOR RIVERSIDE CO. AUDITOR SIERRA COMPUTER SYSTEMS IT & FINAL, INC. SMART & FINAL, INC. IT & FINAL, INC. SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON - SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON - SOUTHERN CALIF GAS COMP SllJTHERH CALIF TELEPHON SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHOR ,SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPI~)N SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHOR SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHOR SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHOR CITY OF TEIECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTIOR BLUEPRINT REPR00UCTIOR BLUEPRINT REPRCOUCTIOR MATER SUPPLIER 2/23-3/23/95 MATER SUPPLIER 2/23-3/23/95 MATER SUPPLIER 2/23-3/23/95 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES PUBLIC POOL RULES-SIGN CPR SIGN FOR POOL NO DIVING SIGN FOR POOLS AUTHORIZED PERSONNEL SIGN EHERGENCY IlLleERS PLEASE SHMR SIGN SHIM POOL CLOSE) SIGN NO FOOD-BEVERAGE SIGN GATE CLOSED SIGN FREIGHT MAR 95 PROF LEGAL $ERVS MAR 95 PRKING CITATIOR ASSESS HAR 95 PRKING CITATIOR ASSESS SIERRA PROGIMJNING/ASSISTANCE RECREATIOR $tJPPLIES RECREATIOR SUPPLIES RECREATIOR SUPPLIES ELECT. SERVICE ENDING 04/04/95 59-77-416-2147-0103/16-04/11/ 07-8274-036-1451-3 SR CNTR 909 202-4769 JS 909 202-6204 KL 909 202-4762 RP 909 202-6758 RR 909 202-4761SM 909 ~-407'0 MJM 909202-6770RN 909 202-6117 JG 909 205-7826GE 909 202-4767 GT 909 202-6759 TE 909 202-6765 DB 909 206-O992 BH 909 202-6112 SN 909 202-4756 KRTN ACC~JNT NUMBER 210-190-137-5802 210-190-137-5802 190-180-999-5260 191 - 180-999- 5260 193-180-999-5240 190-181-999-5212 190-180-999-5244 190-180-999-5246 190-180-999-5244 190-180-999-5244 190-180-999-52/,/, 190-180-999-5244 190-180-999-524,4 190-180-999-52/,4 190-180-999-52/,4 190-180-999-5246 001-130-999-5247 001-2260 001-2265 320-199-999-5248 190-181-999-5301 190-182-999-5301 190-180-999-5301 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5260 190-181-999-5240 001-100-999-5208 001-100-999-5208 001-100-999-5208 001-100-999-5208 001-100-999-5208 001-110-999-5208 001-110-999-5208 001-120-999-5208 001-1/,0-999-5208 001 - 161-999-5208 001-162-999-5208 100-16/,-601 - 5208 190-180-999-5208 190-180-999-5208 320-199-999-5208 ITEM NI3UNT 4~.24 417.64 52.92 32.62 257.69 191.19 39.36 30.62 117.15 54 67.40 23.70 18.96 61.13 39.50 14.73 36.00 375.00 200.00 356.25 133.66 67.66 101.63 1,296.15 15.&0 83.10 38.99 9L78 70.60 156.15 133.20 52.26 91.00 119.24 85.47 38.12 6O.97 58.81 38.12 PAGE 5 Ale/IT 343.23 191.19 627.19 ~.~ 575.00 356.25 302.75 1,311 ~55 47.03 1,207.25 VOUCHRE2 04/20/95 VOUCHER/ CHECK NIJHBER 23276 23277 23277 23270 23?.8O 23281 23282 23283 2328~ 2~285 23285 23285 23285 23285 23285 23286 2328~ 23287 23287 23287 23287 23287 23288 23288 23288 23288 23288 23290 12:17 CHECK DATE 04./20/95 0~/20/95 04120195 04./20/95 04/,/20/95 04/20/95 04/20/95 04/20/95 04/20/95 04/20/95 04/20/95 04/20/95 04/20/95 04/20/95 04/20/95 04/20/95 04/20/95 04/20/95 04/20/95 04/20/95 04/20/95 04/20/95 04/20/95 04/20/95 04/20/95 04,/20/95 04/20/95 04/20/95 04/20/95 04/20/95 04/20/95 VENDOR NUMBER 001505 000305 000305 000957 001898 000320 001921 001065 001065 001065 001065 001065 001065 000389 000389 000389 000325 000325 000325 000325 000325 000326 OOO326 000326 00O326 000326 001881 0003~5 VENDOR NAME STEFFEN, SUE TARGET STORE TARGET STORE TEMECtJLA VALLEY CONGREA TEMECULA VALLEY FILM THOMAS, DEREK TOPCRAFT ELECTRIC TCNNE CENTER STATIONERS TRAMSAMERICA INFORNATIO U R I S A INLAND EMPIRE U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C U S C H/PEBSCO (DEF. C U S C M/PEBS00 (DEF. C U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF, C U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C u s c N/PEBSCO COBRA) U S C N/PEBSCO (OBRA) U S C N/PEBSCO (08RA) UNITED MAY OF THE ]NLAN UNKTED gAY OF THE INLAN UNITED MAY OF THE INLAN UNITED UAY OF THE INLAN UNITED UAY OF THE INLAN UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE, UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE, UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE, UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE, UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE, HATER SAFETY PRODUCTS, XEROX CORPORATION BILLI CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION TUITION REII~SENENT CANDY & RASKETS FOR EASTER PRG CANDY & BASKETS FOR EASTER PRG SECURITY DEPOSIT REFUND SPONSORSHIP OF FILM FESTIVAL REFUND FOR FORFEIT FEES ADDITION LIGHT FIXTURE:F/RE ST OFFICE SUPPLIES MAR 95 HETRORCAN USAGE CHARGE MEllERSHIP FOR KELLI BEAL 001065 DEF CONP 001065 DEF CONP 001065 DEF CONP 001065 DEF COMP 001065 DEF COHP 001065 DEF CONP 000389 PT RETIR 000389 PT RETIR 000389 PT RETIR 000325 000325 000~25 iN 000323 000325 iN UNIFOP. HS FOR Pg NAINT CREgS UNIFORM HAINT FOR TCSD FLOOR HAT RENTAL i CKTY HALL FLOOR HAT RENTAL i CRC FLOOR HAT RENTAL i SR CNTR STAFF T-SHIRTS XLARGE TRANSPARENCY-CLEAR ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-150-999-5259 100-183-~-5370 100-183-~-5370 280-199-999-526~ 190-185-999-5380 001-171-999-5470 100-164.-604.-5220 320-199-999-5211 001-161-999-5226 001-2080 100-2080 190-2080 ~00-2080 320-2080 34.0 - 2080 001-2160 100-2160 190-2160 001-2120 100-2120 165-2120 190-2120 280-2120 100-16~-601-5243 100-180-999-5243 34.0-199-999-5250 190-182-999-5250 190-181-999-5250 190-183-999-5310 330-199-999-5220 ITEM AMOUNT 189.21 223.57 74..76 100.00 7,500.00 60.00 100.00 62.90 597.50 20.00 1,955 132.23 271.50 5.00 312.50 50.00 219.60 65.00 58.4.5 10.05 .75 17.00 .75 23.50 20.85 :~,.50 38.23 18.90 64.00 165.83 PAGE 6 CHECK AMOUNT 189.21 298.33 100.00 7,500.00 100.00 62.90 597.50 2O.0O 7O3.60 87.00 · 135.98 64.00 165.83 TOTAL CHECKS VO~RE2 15:19 CITY OF TERECULA VOUCHER/CNECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE 6 FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 100 GAS TAX FUND 165 RDA DEV- LIN/H00 SET ASIDE 190 COHNUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 192 TCSD SERViCE LEVEL B 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 210 CAPITAL |NPROVEIIENT PROJ FUND 280 REDEVELOPNENT AGENCY - C[P 300 INSURANCE FUND 320 INFORHATION SYSTEHS 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 3,(,0 FACILITIES TOTAL mT 26,118.06 10,094.60 11A.79 13,935.10 129.16 193.14 1,140.06 1,075.82 56,469.39 3~710.36 116.05 1Z,669.Z1 125,861.04, VOUCHRE2 04/27/95 15: 19 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK: NUMBER DATE 73291 06121195 23292 06126195 23293 04/27/95 23299 06/27/95 23300 0/.127/95 73301 04127195 ?3302 04/27/95 23303 04/27/95 23303 04127/95 ?3304 04/27/95 23305 04/27/95 ?3305 04/27/95 23305 04/27/95 23305 04/27/95 23305 04/27/95 23306 04127/95 ?3307 04/27/95 ?3307 04/27/95 ?3308 04/27/95 23309 04/27/95 73310 04/27/95 23311 04/27/95 23312 04/27/95 23313 04127/95 2331/* 04/27/95 23315 04127/95 23316 04/27/95 23316 04/27/95 23317 04/27/95 CITY OF TEHECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VENDOR VENDOR NIJHBER NAME 0019/.0 WHISTLER BREWING CONPAN 000112 AHERICAN PL/INIMG ASSOC 0012/.9 CENTER FOR ORG. EFFECT] 0004~0 AGLCN PHOTOGRAPHY 001/,25 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR CORP. 000102 AHERICAN FENCE CO. OF C 000936 AHERICAN RED CROSS 000101 APPLE ORE, INC. 000101 APPLE ORE, INC. 000781 ASSOC OF ENVIRONMENTAL 000122 B S N SPORTS 000122 B S N SPORTS 000122 B S N SPORTS 000122 B S N SPORTS 000122 B S N SPORTS 001925 001925 000702 000129 00067/* 001627 BEARD, LISA BLIND PIG BREWING CO., BLIND PIG BREWING CO., ITEM DESCRIPTIOR LOAN AGREEMENT; BLIND PIG LUNCH TOUR:DORENIGON] VALLEY CONF:HANAGING ~RK:FRCE:ELHO-WqI STUDIO PICTURES LA 6015202040195 TH (CELLULAR) REPAIR FENCE J SPT PRK MASK FOR POOL (CPR SAFETY EOU] TEI4P HELP W/E/,/15 REER TEHP HELP W/E 02/15 WHITCHER CEQA 101 VORKSHOP A.B.S. BACKBOARD iiHITE RED STRAPS & BUCKLES HEAD IMI4OBILIZER FREIGHT TAX SECURITY DEPOSIT REFUND 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HA 00137/* CALIFORNIA SECRETARY OF 000127 CALIFORNIAN, INC. -LESA 000950 CALIFORNIAN, INC~' DISP 000950 CALIFORNIAN, ]NC.' DISP 001195 CENTRAL SECURITY SERVIC ACCOUNT NI. NBER 280-1520 001-161-999-5261 001 - 162-999-5261 001 - 100-999-5250 320-199-999-5208 190-180-999-5212 190-183-9~9-5310 280-199-999-5250 001-1/.0-999-5118 190-180-999-5258 190-183-999-5310 190-103-9~9-5310 190-183-999-5310 190-183-999-5310 190-183-999-5310 190-2900 NDA LOAN AGREERENT W/BLIND PIG 280-1520 RDA LOAN AGREEMENT WBLIND PIG 280-1520 CADDY GRAPHICS ART kiRK: FOR/*TH OF JULY PRGH CAL REST RENTAL CENTER, PRK HAINT SCISSORLIFT RENTAL CALIFORNIA CONTRACT CIT 36TH ANNUAL 14LJN CONF:R.RO6ERTS CALIFORNIA CPA CONF:GOV'T FORUM RAY 17:OAK:LEY CALIFORN/A CRIRE PREVEN NIg4BERSHIP FOR SANCHEZ & FANEN X-MRK i NEIGH PRKS -EVA/.171 UCC FILING FOR BLIND PiG PUBLIC NOTICE (C,~87R) CONSTRUCTRIOR NOTICES (C3687R) SPRING FAIR PAID AD SECURITY & FIRE MONITORING AT 190-180-999-525/* 190-180-999-5238 001 - 100-999-5238 001 - 1/*0-g99-5261 001-170-999-5261 190-180-999-5/.15 280-199-999-5250 001 - 161-999-5256 001-165-999-525/, 190-180-999-525/* 190-182-999-5250 ITEM AMOUNT 16,/*00.00 72.00 80.00: 32.95 60.~0 326.00 100.00 58.05 60.00 /*00.00 15/*.00 202,90 58.66 100.00 621.99 22,959.55 200,00 108,19 195.00 78.00 50.00 129.75 35.00 145.66 99.30 59.00 PAGE I CTECIC AIqOLJNT 16,600.00 72.00 80.00 32.95 60.90 326.00 100.00 212.85 60.00 8'>, 100.00 23,581.5/* ZO0.O0 108.19 195.00 - 78.00 50.00 129.75 35.00 1/.5.6/* 231.78 ~VO~J~RE2 95 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUNBER 23318 23318 23319 23319 23319 23320 23321 23321 23321 23322 23322 23322 23323 23324 ..,26 23326 23326 23326 23326 23326 23326 23326 23326 23326 23326 23326 23327 23328 23330 23331 23331 23331 23331 15:19 CHECK DATE 04127195 04127195 04127195 04127195 04127195 04127195 04127195 04127195 04/27/95 04/27/~5 04127195 04/27/95 04127195 04127195 04127195 04127195 04127195 04127195 04127195 04127195 04/27195 04127195 04127195 04127/95 04127/95 04127195 04127195 04127195 04127195 04127195 04127195 04/27195 04127195 04127195 04127195 VENDOR t/U~ER 000138 000138 001535 001535 001535 000155 000155 000155 001673 001673 001673- 000453 0OO754 000160 000160 000160 000160 000160 000160 000160 000160 000160 000160 000160 000160 001941 00099~ 000172 000184 000184 000184 00018~ CITICORP NORTH N4ERICA CITICORP NORTH N4ERICA CREEKSIDE TEXACO, INC. CREEKSIDE TEXACO, INC. CREEKSIDE TEXACO, IMC. CllB SCOUT PACK 301 DAVL[N DAVLIN DAVL[N DIVERSIFIED TENPORARY S DIVERSIFIED TENPORARY S DIVERSIFIED TEMPORARY S ECONOHICS PRESS, INC. T ELLIOTT OROIJP, THE ELSINORE UNION HIGH SCH EHPLOYNENT DEVELOPHENT EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPRENT EMPLOYHENT DEVELOPHENT EMPLOYMENT DEVELCFHENT EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPI4ENT EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPHENT ENPLOYNENT DEVELOPNENT ENPLOYMENT DEVELOPIENT ENPLOYNENT DEVELOPtENT EHPLOYMENT DEVELOPHENT EMPLOYNENT DEVELOPtENT EMPLOYMENT DEVELO!:'NENT EXPLORER POST 88~ FREEDON COFFEE, INC. GASB GTE G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM G T E CALIFORMIA - PAYH CITY OF TENECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEH DESCRIPTION LEASE PITT FOR TELEPHONE SYSTEH LEASE NIT FOR TELEPHONE SYSTEH VEHICLE NAINT ' PUBLIC RORKS VEHICLE NAINT FOR PUBLIC MOltKS VEHICLE NAIMT. - PUBLIC gORK$ SECURITY DEPOSIT REFUND AUDIO TAPING OF COUNCIL MEETIN PLANNING COllq TAPING 4117/95 PLANNING COIl TAPING 4119195 TEHP HELP WE 3~26 FRITCHEY TENP HELPWE 6/9195 ROllAll TEMP HELP UIE 4116 CURINCA RENEiikL 7/95-6197 LANDSCAPE REVIEU FEES FOR NAR SECURITY DEPOSIT REFUND 1ST QTR UI PAYMENT 1ST QTR UI PAYRENT 1ST QTR U] PAYHENT 1ST GTR UI PAYMENT 1ST QTR UI PAY!4ENT 1ST QTR UI PAYMENT 1ST QTR UI PAYRENT 1ST GTR UI PAYMENT 1ST QTR UI PAY!4ENT 1ST QTR UI PAYMENT 1ST QTR UI PAYHEHT 1ST QTR UI PAYMENT C(liF:MEST REGION LAg;POLICE DT COFFEE SlIPPLIES CITY HALL GASB DOC, + ACTIOll RPTS (1YR) SETTLEHENT CLAIH # 95-147 TELEPHONE PAYNENT 181-1123 TELEPHONE PAYRENT; 694-1993 TELEPHONE PAWtENT 695-3564. TELEPHONE PAYNENT; 699-7~45 ACCOUNT .U.aER 320-199-999-5391 320-2800 001-163-999-5214 100-164-601-5214 100-164-601-5214 190-183-4990 001-100-999-5230 001 - 161-999-5250 001-161-999-5250 001-161-999-5118 001-161-999-5118 001-161-999-5118 001-162-999-5228 001-161-999-5230 190-2900 001-2350 100-2350 165-2350 190-2350 191-2350 192-2350 193-2350 - 280-2350 300-2350 320-2350 330-2350 540-2350 001-170-999-5235 :340-199-999-5250 001-140-999-5228 300-199-999-5207 320-19~-;-5208 320-1W-;-5208 320-1W-;-5208 320-19f-;-5208 ITEH Ne0Ut/T 152.69 1,275.08 271.12 120.13 430.68 100.00 801.67 168.02 156.68 288.96 216.72 5O5.68 80.50 623.00 120.00 15,622.21 3,588.61 114.7~ 4,398.83 129.16 193.14 ~.82 57.60 141.02 116.05 5Za.02 1,000.00 196.68 120.00 154.20 545.13 1,284.01 51.33 54.42 PA~E 2 CHE~ N4CURT 1,427.57 :821.93 100.00 1,118.37 1,011,36 80.50 625.00 120.00 23,621.05 1,000.00 196.68 120.00 156.20 ~z,3.32 04127/95 000481 GEOTECHNICAL & ENVIRONH NOV 9~ PROF SERVE-HINDERGARDT 210-190-136-580~ 94.00 12 04127195 001X81 GEOTECHNICAL & ENVIRONH FEB 95 PEOF SERVE-PALA COIl PK 210-190-120-5802 9~,00 VOUCHRE2 04127195 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 23332 23333 23333 23333 23333 23335 2333~ 23337 23338 23339 233~0 233~1 233~2 233~2 ?,33~3 ?.33~5 23345 233~7 233/*7 233~7 23350 15:19 CHECK DATE 04127195 06/27/95 0412 7 /95 04/27/95 04/27/95 04/27/95 04/27/95 04/27/95 04/27/95 04/27/95 04/27/95 06/27/95 04/27/95 04/27/95 04/27/95 04/27/95 04/27/95 04127/95 04/27/95 04/27/95 04127/95 04/27/95 04/27/95 04/27/95 04/27/95 04/27/95 04/27/95 04/27/95 04/27/95 04127195 04/27/95 04/27/95 04/27/95 VENDOR NIJNBER 000~81 000177 000177 000177 000177 000177 000178 000178 000175 001359 001908 000663 000663 001934 001186 001896 001896 000820 000820 000886 000206 000206 00153/* 001534, 001891 001891 00021/* 000216 000216 001936 00138/, CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PER ZOOS VENDOR ITEM NAME DESCRIPTIOR GEOTECHNICAL & ENVIRONM FEB 95 PROF SERVS-HINDERGARDT GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISC. OFFICE SlIPPLIES; CTY !r~ GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES/BLDG & SAFETY GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT NISC OFFICE SUPPLIES GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES GLENNIES OFFICE PRCOUCT GOLDEN STATE TP, N)ING CO GOLDEN STATE TRADING CO GOLDEN STATE TRN)ING CO GOVERNHENT FINANCIAL OF HODSOR, JACK HUHAN KINETICS R. IBLISHE IAPMO IAPMO INLAND LABEL PRINTING IRV[N, JOHN JOHNSOIl FENCE COMPANY JOHNSON FENCE COleANY KRW&AS~IATES KRW&AS~IATES KHALSA, ATMA KAUR KINKO'S OF RIVERSIDE, KINKO'S OF RIVERSIDE, LA HASTERS OF FINE TRAV LA HASTERS OF FINE TRAV LINFIELD SCHOOL LINFIELD SCHOOL LUNCH & STUFF CATERING LUNCH & STUFF CATERING LUNCH & STUFF CATERING MARKET FIXTURES IllLIMIT MEDIEVAL TILES DINNER & MINUTEMAN PRESS OFFICE SUPPLIES/BLDG & SAFETY HP OFFICEJET PRINTER/FAX/COPY FREIGHT TAX SUBSCKIP:NEMSLETTER 6/95-5/96 ANNUAL BOOT ALLOMANCE RECREAT[UN REFERENCE BOOKS 1996 UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE TAX LOAN AGREEMENT WBLIMD PIG TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS INSTALL BIJ!eER POST 8 CRC CRC POOL GATE REPAIRS MAP & PLAN CHECK SERVICES FOR MORKER$ COle FOR APR 95 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS MISC PRINTING & OFFICE SUPPLIE MISC PRINTING & SUPPLIES CONF:C~FO LEG UR)ATE:G.RORERT CONF:CSHFO LEG UFDATE:NJN SECURITY DEPOSIT REFUND NAY 95 LEASE PHT FOR INTERIM S CATERING SERVS FOR IEETINGS CATERING SERVS FOR IEETINGS CITY COUNCIL IEETINGS CATERING LOAN AGREBENT V/BLIND PIG FIELD TRIP FOR COMM SERVS NOTICE OF VIOLATION FORHS ACCOUNT NUMBER 210-190-136-580/* 001 - 110-999-5220 001-162-999-5220 001 - 1/,0-999-5220 001-1/.0-999-5220 001 - 162-999-5220 001-171-999-5670 001-171-999-5/.70 001 - 171-999-5670 001-110-999-5228 001-163-999-5243 190-180-999-5228 001 - 162-999-5228 001-162-999-5228 280-1520 190-183-999-5330 190-182-999-5212 190-182-999-5212 001-163-999-52/.9 001-1182 190-183-999-5330 001-161-999-5222 190-180-999-5222 001 - 14,0-999-5258 001-110-999-5258 190-2900 001 - 171-999- 5/*70 001 - 160-999-5250 001 - 110-999-5250 001 - 100-999-5260 280-1520 190-183-999-5350 001-162-999-5222 ITEM AMOUNT 47.00 17.52 18.91 70.50: 99.13 29.09 770.00 8.50 59,67 55.00 95,00 163.76 385.65 29.89 6,672.OD 683.20 650.00 887.00 /.12.50 16.58- 27.19 515.76 169.GO 169.00 600.00 20.00 10.00 1,999.25 2~.~8 PAGE 3 · CHECK AHOUNT 235.00 235.15 838.17 55.00 95.00 163.76 615.56 1,337.00 397.92 /36.80 5~2.95 . 298.00 660.00 110,00 1,999.25 285 ./.7 VOUCHER/ CHECK NtJMBER 23350 23351 23352 23352 23352 23352 23353 23356 7.3355 ?.3356 ~356 2:3357 7.3358 ~.~9 ?.3359 Z3359 7_3360 23361 7.3362 23363 2336~ Z3365 23366 23367 ~369 15:19 CHECK DATE 04/27/95 04127/95 04127195 04/27/95 04/27/95 04/27/95 04127/95 04127/95 04127/95 04127/95 04/27/95 04127/95 04127/95 04127/95 04127/95 04/2?/95 04/27/95 04127/95 04127/95 04127195 04/27/95 04/27/95 04/27/~5 04/27/95 04/27/95 04/27/95 04/27/95 04/2?/95 04/27/95 04/27/95 04/27/95 04127195 CITY OF TENEOULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VENDOR liLtfiBER 001384 00088~ 000883 00088~ 00088 000399 00118~ 001663 0002~5 0002~5 000239 ITEM DESCRIPTION MINUTEMAN PRESS TAX MOBIL, INC. MONTELEONE EXCAVATING MOI/TELEOIIE EXCAVATING MONTELEOIIE EXCAVATING MONTELEONE EXCAVATING NUNI MANAGEMENT ASSIST FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES BIER REPAIR IIC-PINA COLADA BIERGENCY REPAIR VORK EMERG ROAD REPAIRS-RAIN DAMAGE ENER REPAIR WtK-SAIITIAGO ST. MEMBERSHIP GRANT YATES MURRIETA DEVELOPMENT CO EMERGENCY REPAIR; FIRE SYSTEM ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-162-999-5222 100-16~-601-5263 100-164-601-5602 100-166-601-5602 100-1~-~01-5~02 100-166-601-5602 001-150-~;-5226 1~0-182-~-5212 NATIONAL ASSOC. OF PURC STUDY MATERIALS FOR CPH:THORSB OO1-1~0-999-5261 0 C B REPROGRAPHZCS, IN BLUEPRINTS FOR PARKVIEV PRJT 0 C B REPROGRAPHZCS, IN BLUEPRINTS FOR PARICVIE~ PRJT OLSTEN STAFFING SERVICE TEHP HELP V/E 6/2 GRAGE MAILING CHARGE FOR MINUTES PATTERSON, BECIff RECRUITMENT ADVERTISING SEASONAL POSITIONS ADVERTISING DISPLAY ADVERTISING ROADMAY CONSTRUCTION ADS 000256 PRESS-ENTERPRISE COIlPAN 000236 PRESS-ENTERPRISE COl!PAN 000256 PRESS-ENTERPRiSE COHPAN 000256 PRESS-ENTERPRISE COl!PAN TCSD LOCKBIITH SERVICES TCSD LOCKBIITH SERV]CES OPEN 000255 PRO LOCK & KEY 000255 PRO LOCK & KEY 000270 R J M DESION GROUP, INC HAR 95 PROF SERVS-COIZ PRKVIEV MATER SERVICE 3/1-3/30/95 MATER SERVICE 3/1-3/30/95 MATER SERVICE 3/1-3/30/95 000262 000262 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA MATER RANClIO CALIFORNIA MATER RANClIO CALIFORNIA MATER 000426 RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES 000426 RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL HULTI-FOLD TOMELS;DISPENSER 000678 RIVERSIDE CO. HEALTH SE VECTOR CONTROL-JAN 95-MAR 95 000357 RIVERS[DE CO. TRANSPORT CONF:EROSIN CNTRL:HODSON-HANGU CC~F:CA EXECUTIVE ACJ4DENY:R.R. 000873 ROBERTS, RONALD H. 001935 ROSE CITY PAPER BOX LOAN AGREEHENT V/BLIND PIG 0006~5 SItART & FINAL, INC. CANDY FOR SPRING EGG HUNT 000~73 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909 202-6736 KH 000~75 SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON 909 202-6755 CITY VAN 210-1~O-&2&-5802 210-1~0-626-5802 001-162-~-5118 001-1~-~-5260 001-150-999-5236 lfO- 180-~-5256 001 - 161-999-5256 001 - 165-999-5256 190-180-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 210-190-626-5802 193-180-999-5Z40 190-180-999-5260 193-180-999-5260 ~60-199-999-5212 ~0-199-999-5212 190-180-999-5250 100-166-60~-5258 001-100-999-5258 280-1520 190-180-999-5301 190-180-999-5208 190-180-999-5208 ITEM NIOUNT 18.95 2~,.55 1,231.73: 1,617.00 1,478. Z5 1,652.66 60.00 69.20 18.32 22.50 655.63 16.00 259.39 A~9.07 76.00 326.82 800.00 28.37 6~.87 132.31 9~.55 50.00 120.00 56.15 200.96 111.31 39.21 PAGE CIECK aT 26.55 5,779.66 60.00 903.69 69.20 40.82 655.63 16.OO 959.63 . 226.86 50.00 120.OO 56.15 9,223.75 2O0.96 150.52 VOUCHRE2 04/27/~5 15: 19 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR HUHBER DATE NLIIBER 23370 04127195 000521 23371 04/27/95 000700 23372 04/27/95 0003(~ 23373 0/*1271~5 000307 23~7/* 0/*/27/~5 000319 2337/* 04/27/95 000319 2337/* 04/27/~5 000319 2337/* 04127195 000319 23375 04/27/95 001898 233?6 04/2?/95 000320 23371' 04/2?/95 000326 23377 0~/27/95 000326 23378 04/2?/95 001:342 23378 04/2?/95 001342 233?9 04/2?/95 001939 23380 04/27/95 001926 23381 04/27/95 00C)~.8 CiTY OF TENEOULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERZOOS VENDOR NAHE STEVART, BRUCE N. TENEOULA ARTS COUNCIL TENECULA COPIERS TENEOULA TROPHY CO. TOHARK SPORTS, INC. TOHARK SPORTS, INC. TOHARK SPORTS, INC. TONARK SPORTS,, INC. TOPCRAFT ELECTRIC iTEM DESCRIPTION CONTRACT SERVICE/BRUCE STEIJART TICKET FOR HAYOR~S BALL:RONERT TONER FOR FIRE DEPT COPIER lst-2nd-3rd PLACE ROSETTE BASEBALL EQUiP-SLIDER BASE BASEBALL EQUIP-SAF-T-SLIDER BA FREIGHT TAX iNSTALL PHONES i INTERIM STATI TOllE CENTER STATIONERS MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES P.M. ONITOG RENTAL SERVICE, UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE, WAXZE SANITARY SUPPLY, WAXZE SANITARY SUPPLY, WINDSOR PROJECTS, iNC. YELLON FRE/GHT SYSTEMS, ZIGLER, OAIL ON]FORMS ' CLEANED, PRESSED, ONIFORI4RAINTERANCE FOR TCSD BLDG NAINT. SUPPLIES ' CRC BLDG. HAINT. SUPPLIES - CEC HAR95 RENT-APR 95 CAN LOAN AGREEMENT W/BLIND PiG REFRESHHENTS FOR F]RE STATION TOTAL CHECKS ACCOUNT NI. NBER 001-162-f~-57.50 001 - 100-~q~-5260 001-171-999-5215 190-180-~9-5380 190-183-~-5380 190-183-999-5380 190-183-~-5380 190-183-999-5380 001 - 171 -~- 5/,70 100-1~.-604-5220 100-164-601-5243 190-180-~-5243 190-182-999-5212 190-182-~-5212 340-199-~-52:~ 280-1520 190-180-9~-5260 ITEM AHOUNT 125.00 50.00 27.69; 77.00 585.00 65.00 23.58 50.38 875.00 7.47 23.50 20.85 155.11 250.8~ 11,/.97.65 345.65 130.00 PAGE 5 CHECK AHOUNT 125.00 50.00 27.69 77.00 723.96 875. O0 .35 11,4.~. ,, 345.65 130.00 125,861 ~V~UCI!RE2 16:09 CITY OF TENECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 100 GAS TAX FUND 190 COlqHUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 210 CAPITAL INPROVEHENT PROJ FUND 280 REDEVELOPNENT AGENCY - TOTAL ANOUNT 221,?.21.75 16,050.88 28,630.17 1,751.0/, 30,286.96 151 ,/,19.68 5/,,035.08 503,395.56 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TENECULA 04/27/95 16:09 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE 1 ~.. VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEH NUMBER DATE NUNHER NANE DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT CHECK AI~UNT 23385 05/09195 001281 ALHAMBRA GROUP DESIGN SERVICES'NARGARITA PARK 210'190'119'5802 10,545.00 23386 05/09/95 001344 ANERICAN CONTRACTING, I RELEASE OF RETENTION W/H 210'2035 32,049.13 23387 05/09/95 001/,/,5 ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF TE COIe4UNITY SERVICES FUNDING 001'100'999'5267 1,000.00.' 10,545.00 32,Q49.13 1,000.00 23388 05/09/95 001933 ASSOCIATED WINE DISTRIB LOAN AGNEENENT W/BLIND PIG 280-1520 6,321.25 6,321.25 23389 05/09/95 001516 BARTON-ASCleUkN ASSOCIAT TRAFFIC XIqPACT ANALYSIS-OLD TW 280-199-999-5248 560.62 23389 05/09/95 001516 BARTON-ASCHNAN ASSOCIAT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS-OLD T~ 280-1270 560.42 · 1,120.8~ 233g0 05/09/95 000123 BURKE WlLLIAMS & SOltENS PAR 95 LEGAL $ERVS-GENERAL 001-130-999-52~6 3,150.00 23390 05/09/95 000123 BURKE UILLI,~S & SOltENS PAR 95 LEGAL SERV$ 001-130-999-52~6 22,563.89 23390 05/09/95 000123 BURKE WILLIAMS & SOREMS FeAR 95 LEGAL SERV$ 190-180-999-52~6 256.00 23390 05/09/95 000123 BURKE WlLLIAMS & SOREMS NAR 95 LEGAL SERVS 300-199-999-5207 2,211.50 23390 05/09/95 000123 BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENS PAR 95 LEGAL SERVS 001-1280 774.39 23390 05/09/95 000123 BURKE UILLIAMS & SOREMS PAR 95 LEGAL SERVS RDA 280-199-~-5246 1,356.93 23390 05/09/95 000123 BURKE glLLIAMS & SOREHS PENDING APPROVAL FRON CLAINS A 300-199-~-5207 2,211.50- 23391 05/09/95 000638 CAL/FONNIA DEPT OF CONS 1ST QTR SIll FEES 001-2280 493.37 23391 05/09/95 000638 CAL/FORN]A DEPT OF COILS 1ST QTR SNI FEES 001-2290 1,832,99 23391 05/09/95 000638 CALIFORNIA DEPT OF CONS 1ST QTR $Nl FEES 001-2290 25.97 23391 05/09/95 000638 CALIFORNIA DEPT OF CONS 1ST QTR SRl FEES 001-162-4229 117.62- 28,101.21 23392 05/0o/95 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE PA MARTINIQUE LANDSCAPE 193'180'999'5416 6,820.70 23392 05/09/95 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HA TREE TRIN AT WINCHESTER CREEK 193'180'999'5415 6,085.00 23392 05/09/95 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HA APR LANDSCAPE PAINT t CRC 190-182'999'5415 1,619.00 23392 05/09/95 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HA APR LANDSCAPE PAINT t NEDIANS 191'180'999'5415 859.94 23392 05/09/95 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HA APR LANDSCAPE PAINT g NEIGH PR 190-180'99~'5415 12,759.~4 23:392 05/09/95 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HA APR LANDSCAPE PAINT i SR CNTR 190-181'999'5415 175,00 23392 05/09/95 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE PA FEB & MAR LANDSCAPE I YNEZ RD 191'180'999'5415 769.88 23392 05/09/95 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HA FEB & MAR LANDSCAPE PAINT i LO 190-180'999'5415 576.82 29,665.78 23393 05/09/95 001929 CONPLEAT UINEffiI, KER, THE LOAN AGREElENT U/BLIND PIG 280-1520 1,2999.58 23393 05/09/95 001929 COIqPLEAT VINENAKER, THE LOAN AGREElENT V/BLIND PIG 280-1520 8,892.10 10,191.68 233~4 05/09/95 001923 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS lIAR 95 PROF SERVS-FIELD INVEST 210-190-626-5802 2,351.39 2,351.39 23395 05/09/95 001932 CROSS DISTRIBUTING CO., LOAN AGREElENT W/BLIND PIG 280-1520 10,464.14 10,/~4.7/, 23396 05/09/95 001920 E P T LANDSCAPE ARCHZTE 6TH STREET PROP. SKETCHES 280-199-999-52~8 1,953.00 23397 05/09/95 001380 E S I ENPLOY!qENT SERVIC TEMP INSPECT HELP W/E 3/31 COX 001-162-999-5230 4,356.00 23398 05109195 000754 ELL]OTT GROUP, THE FEB 95 LANDSCAPE REVIEW FEES 001-161-999-5250 5,825.00 23399 05/09/95 000164 ESGIL CORPORATION MAR 95 PLAN CHECK SERVS 001-162-999-5248 4,763.8/, 4,763.84 23/,00 05199195 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE APR LANDSCAPE PAINT FOR SLOPES 193-180-999-5~15 17,381.26 234.00 05/09/93 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE APR LANDSCAPE PAINT FOR SPT PR 190-180-999-5415 6,877.81 24,Zr~L,Q7 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUIiER 234.01 2~02 2~02 2~02 2_~03 2~0~ 23405 ~05 ~07 ~08 ~10 ;10 ~10 ~11 ~12 ~12 ~12 ~13 ~15 ~17 ~17 ~17 ~18 16:09 CHECK DATE 05/09/~5 05/0~/95 05/09/95 05/0~/95 05/09/95 05109195 05/09/95 05/09/95 05/09/95 05/09/95 05/09/95 05/09/95 05/09/95 05/09/95 05/09/95 05/09/95 05/09/95 05/09/95 05/09/95 05/09/95 05/09/95 05/09/95 05/09/95 05/09/95 05/09/95 05/09/95 05/09/95 05/09/95 05/09/95 05/09/95 05/09/95 05/09/95 05/09/95 05/09/95 VENDOR NtI4BER 0019'51 0004.81 000481 000481 000551 000175 000./,88 000388 001930 000202 001369 001689 001689 001689 001207 001007 001007 001383 001911 000267 000270 000270 000270 001327 001327 001327 CITY OF TE!4ECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOe ALL PERIODS VENDOR NANE FRENCH VALLEY UINERY GEOTECHNICAL & ENVIRONN GEOTECHNICAL & ENVZRONM GEOTECHNICAL & ENVIROIN G[LLZSS, NAX C.H. GOVERNNENT FINANCIAL OF I C B O, INC. ! C B O, ]NC, I D D PROCESS & PACKAGI J F DAVIDSON ASSOCIATES KANE, BALLNER & BERKNAN KOLER[CH, THONA$ & LORE KOLERICH, THONAS & LORE KOLERZCH, THINAS & LORE KOLERICH, THOMAS & LORE ITEH DESCRIPTIOR LOAN AGREElENT WBLIND PIG OCT 96 PEOF SERVS-PALA C014H PIC OCT 96 PItOF SERVS-PALA CClel PIC NOV 95 PEOF SERVS-PALA (:(X4 PlC JAN-NAR 95 CONSULTING SERVS TUITION FEES 1995 ADVANCE) GOV 1F~. BLDG INSPECTOR NEC BOOKS TAX LOAN AGREElINT V/BLIND PiG kilNCHESTER lID ENGINEER DESIGN NAR 95 PROF LEGAL SERVS REFtJ!i-OVRCHG TCSD RATE FYVI-5 REFUND-OVRCHG TCND RATE FY91-5 REFUND-OVRCHG TCSD RATE FY91-5 REFIJND-OVRCHG TCSD RATE FY91-5 HACADEE ELECTRICAL CONS TRAFFIC S]GNAL i HARGARITARD HACADEE ELECTRICAL CONS TRAFFIC SIGNAL I HARAGAR/TA RD HACADEE ELECTR]CAL CONS RETENT]OR ki/H )NV 138~ HARTIN J. JASKA, INC. RELEASE STOP NOTICES 140RR]S HURRY GESSOU HORR]S 141JRRY GESSOU HORRISNtJRRY GESSOki NORRIS HURRY GESSOki REIqJND OF PLANNING FEES REFt, RI) OF PLANNING FEES REFUND OF PLANNING FEES REFUND OF PLANNING FEES NPG ~P. NPG ~P. GRADE SOIL FOR CONCRETE ADDITIONAL GRADING & RATERIALS P N ki ASSOCIATES, INC. 2-DAY NGNT DEV I,KSHP CONSULTAN PALAlIGA RESORT RETREAT APW!L 13'16, 1995 PESTI4ASTER R J N DESIGN GROUP, INC R'J M DESIGN GROUP, INC R J N DESIGN OROUP, INC R]GNT-OF-MAY NEED CRTRL PRGN FEB 95 IqtOF SERV$:PEK'VIEV STAT NAR 95 PROF SERVS-PRK'VIB4 STAT PROGRESS Iqrl' FOR AIENIX,i"ENT1 RANClIO RECYCLED PRODUCT EANCHO RECYCLED PRODUCT RANClIO RECYCLED PRODUCT RECYCLED 3 RAIL FENCE AT KENT LABOR TAX ACCOUNT NUIIER 280-1520 210-1~)-120-5802 21 O- 1~0-120-5802 210-1~0-120-5802 001-110-999-524,8 001-1~0-999-5261 001-162-9~9-5228 001-162-999-5228 280-1520 210-16S-661-5802 280-199-999-52~6 190-180-6005 190-180-999-5375 191-180-999-5375 191-180-6005 210-165-64.2-5806 210-165-642-580A 210-2035 210-20:58 001-161-6119 001-161-6129 001-163-6129 001-163-6388 001-171-~-5670 001 - 171 -~- 5670 001-110-~-5258 001-110-~-5258 100- lt4-~01 -.%02 210-1~0-626-5802 210-1~0-626-5802 210-1~0-138-5802 1~0-180-~-5212 1~)-180-f~-5212 1~0-180-~-5212 ITEH N4OUNT 1,000.00 2,500.00 5,903.00 2,617./~ '. 9,000.00 1,250.00 1,751.00 1/.~,.60 6,695.76 9,500.00 513.00 1,309.90 31.76 7,316.65 26,330.15 3,366.67- 19,991.25 935.00 570.50 65.00 18,278.82 7,967.18 2,238.80 1,521.77 16,050.88 10,76~.60 1,345.55 16,800.00 2,880.00 1,~.0.00 22:5.20 PAGE 2 10,820.63 9,O0O.00 1,250.00 1,895.40 6,695.76 9,500.00 5,O62.25 30,280.~ 19,991.25 1,625.50 26,2/~.00 2,2)8.8O 1,521 .T/ 16,050.88 VOUCHRE2 0~127195 VOUCHER/ CHECK NU!eER 2.,~20 Z~21 2:~22 2T~22 2~22 2~26 Z.~25 Z.~2& 2)627 16:09 CHECK DATE 05/09/~5 05/09/~5 05109/95 05109195 05109195 0510~1~5 05109195 0510~1~5 05109195 05/09/95 05/09/95 VENDOR VENDOR NUI4BER NAHE 000267 RIVERSIDE CO. FIRE DEPT 000354 RIVERSIDE IX). HEALTH DE 001675 RIVERSIDE CO./GSA BUILD 001483 TON DOO SON & ASSOCIATES 00148~ TON DODSON & ASSOCIATES 001/,83 TON DODSON & ASSOCIATES 000978 TRAUNA INTERVENTION PRO 001602 TRNJTIiEIN CONSTRUCTION 000332 VANDORPE CHOU ASSOCIAT! 0005)9 kIINHER YN4ADA ASSOCIATE 001927 ZAPATA INDUSTRIES, INC. CITY OF TENEOULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERZOOS ZTEN DESCRIPTION 2ND OTR COST FOR FIRE SERVS FEB 95 ANINAL CONTROL SERVS REAL PROPERTY SERVS FOR kIINCHE ACCOUNT NU!4BER 001-171-F)~-5251 001-172-;'5Z55 210-165-602-5700 HAR 95 SERVS FOR ENTERTAIN ADV 280-1~-F)~-5268 HAR 95 SERVE FOR ENTERTAIN ADV 280-1270 RETENTION WH INV BU-050-9 3PJ) QTR USER FEES:EHER RESPONS RELEASE OF RETENTION HAR 95 PLAN CHECK SERV$ HAR 95 PROF SERVS-PALA CONN PK LOAN AGREEHENT kI/BLIND PIG 280-2035 001 - 171-999-5274 210 - 2035 001-162-999-524,8 21 O- 190-120-5802 280-1520 TOTAL CHECKS ITEM 123,205.92 7,007.6/, 1,2.37.20 '. 1,850. O0 1,850.00 370.00' 1,312.50 3,100.00 1,250.39 4,635.00 6,538.63 PAGE 3 AHOUNT 123,205,92 7,007 · 1,237.20 3,330.00 1,312.50 3,100.00 1,250.39 6,635.00 6,538.63 503,39r/-r~ ITEM 4 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY MANAGER~ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Genie Roberrs, Finance Officer May 9, 1995 City Treasurer's Report as of March 31, 1995 PREPARED BY: Tim McDermott, Chief Accountant RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive and file the City Treasurer's Report as of March 31, 1995. DISCUSSION: Reports to the City Council regarding the City's investment portfolio and receipts, disbursements and fund balance are required by Government Code Sections 53646 and 41004 respectively. The City's investment portfolio is in compliance with the Code Sections as of March 31, 1995. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: 1. City Treasurer's Report as of March 31, 1995 2. Schedule of Assets, Liabilities, and Fund Equity as of March 31,1995 City of Temecula City Treasurer's Report As of March 31, 1995 Cash Activity for the Month of March: Cash and Investments as of March 1, 1995 Cash Receipts Cash Disbursemems Cash and Investments as of March 31, 1995 $ 49,472,458 2,573,391 (3,261,013) $ 48,784,836 Cash and Investments Portfolio: Type of Investment Petty Cash General Checking Benefit Demand Deposits Local Agency Investment Fund Deferred Compensation Fund Deferred Compensation Fund Defined Contribution Fund Trust Accounts-TCSD COPs Reserve Account-TCSD COPs Trust Accounts-RDA Bonds Construction Fund-RDA Bonds Reserve Account-RDA Bonds Institution Yield City Hall First Interstate First Interstate State Treasurer 5.934 % ICMA PEBSCO PEBSCO Bank of America 5.850 BofA - Bayerische Landesbank 6.870 Bank of Amedca 5.850 BofA - Bayerische Landasbank 6.210 BofA - Bayerische Landesbank 7.400 Balance $ 800 (355, 163) 4,820 35, 188,475 263,808 304,488 19,938 181,700 502,690 338,360 10,886,000 1,448,920 $ 48,784,636 (1) (1) (1)-This amount is nat of outstanding checks. Per Govemment Code Requirements, this Treasurer's Report is in compliance with the City of Temecula's inve~r~ent policy and there are adequate funds available to meet budgeted and actual expenditures of the City of Temecula for the next thirty days. City of Temecula Schedule of Assets, Liabilities, and Fund Balances As of March 31, 1995 Assets: Cash and investments Receivables Due from other funds Land held for resale Fixed assets-net Toted assets Community Services Redevelopmerit city (1) Dbt,ct Agency Total $ 28,058,8~0 $ 1,872,993 $ 18,852,953 $ 48,764,836 1,988,899 122,300 114,767 2,225,966 587,661 587,661 918,171 2,004,569 2,922,740 494,331 494,331 $ 32,047,952 $ 1,995~93 $ 20,972,280 $ 55,015,594 Ijabilitk,: Due to other funds Other liabilities Total liabilities $ 554,861 $ 32,800 $ 2,686,507 $ 187,076 399,515 3,241,368 187,076 432,415 Fund equity: Contributed capital 1,030,248 Retained earnings 147,313 Fund balances: Reserved (2) 2,929,568 Designated (3) 14,585,809 Undesigrmted 10,113,558 Total fund equity 28,806,584 Total liabilities and fund equity 728,413 5,773,128 1,079,804 14,766,746 1,808,217 20,539,874 $ 32,047,952 $ 1,295,293 $ 20,972,268 $ 587,661 3,273,198 3,860,859 1,030,246 147,313 9,431,103 30,432,449 10,113,558 51,154,675 55,015,534 (1) Includes General Fund, CIP Fund, Gas Tax Fund, other special revenue funds, and defeffed comp agency funds. (2) Includes amounts reswved for encumbrances, land hid for resale, long-tern notes receivable, Iowlmod housing, and debt service. (3) Includes mounts designated for e~onomic uncertainty, debt service, and continuing appropriations. ITEM 5 ~PPROV~T.~ e[~Z ATTOP, NK"Z FINANCE OFFiC CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Manager/City Council Genie Roberta, 'Finance Officer May 9, 1995 Contract for Audit Services for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1995 RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve a one-year extension with Moreland and Associates to provide audit services for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1995. DISCUSSION: On May 26, 1992 the City Council authorized the selection of Moreland and Associates, Certified Public Accountants, over four other audit firms to serve as the City's auditors under a three-year contract. The current audit contract expires this fiscal year. Moreland and Associates has extensive municipal experience and is highly respected in the field of governmental accounting and auditing. They have provided timely and thorough audit services which has enabled staff to meet its financial reporting deadlines at the state and national levels. During the past three years, Moreland and Associates has proven to be very accessible to City staff as needed to provide technical support, as well as to provide supplemental or special audit services when requested. Moreland and Associates has currently submitted a proposal to provide audit services for the next three years. Staff feels that a one-year extension of the existing agreement is in the best interest of the City, A request for proposal will then be initiated by staff during the coming year to various local and regional auditing firms for future audit services, The proposed contract amount (including expenses) is 817,000, which is an approximate 4% increase over last year's fee. FISCAL IMPACT: Funds for the proposal have been budgeted in the both the Finance Department and Redevelopment Agency FY 1994/95 consulting line items, as well as the proposed FY 1995196 budgets. Attachment: Moreland and Associates Proposal letter Moreland CF, RT1RED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS 6~0 NEVePOgrT CI;NTIe~ DRIVg. gUITg; ~J.O NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92660 (714) 760-9788 2111 PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD, SUITE 150 CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92009 (619) 431-8476 February 2, 1998 Ms. Genie Roberrs Finance Officer City of Tcmccula 43172 Business Park Road Tcmccula, CA 92390 Dear Ms. Roberts: In accordance with your request, we are submitting this letter proposal to extend our existing agreement for auditing services with the City of Temecula to cover each of the three years ending June 30, 1997. The scope of work will remain unchanged with regards to audit services for the City of Tcmccula- The hourly rates to be used in computing our fees to the City wfll increase approximately 4% each year resulting in hourly rams for the three years as follows: L~vel of Work Performed 1995 1996 1997 Partner $123 $128 $133 Manager 99 103 107 Senior Accountant 64 67 70 Assistant Accountant 58 61 63 Qerical 29 30 31 We estimate that our total fees, including out-of-pocket expenses, will be as follows for each of the three years ending June 30, 1997. 1995 1996 1997 Qty $12,400 $12,900 $13,400 Rcdcvelopment Agency 2,300 2,400 2,500 Single Audit 2.300 2.400 ' 2.500 Total $17.000 $17,700 $18.400 lVls. Genie Roberrs Finance Officer City of Temccula Page 2 We appreciate the opportunity to continue as auditors for the City of Temecula. We would be pleased to discuss with you at your convenience the contents of this letter or any other matters you may wish to discuss. Please acknowledge acceptance of our proposed hourly rates and maximum fees by signing and returning a copy of this letter for our files Very truly yours, MORELAND & ASSOCIATES Michael C. Moreland, Parmer MCM:shd ACCEPTANCE OF HOURLY RATES AND MAXIMUM FEES: Date: ITEM 6 APPROV~ x~( CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFI CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: City Manager/City Council Genie Roberts, Finance Officer DATE: May 9, 1995 SUBJECT: Extension of Agreement for Banking Services RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve a two-year extension with First Interstate Bank to provide banking services through June 30, 1997. DISCUSSION: On February 23, 1993, the City Council, through an RFP process, authorized the selection of First Interstate Bank (FIB) over five other banks to perform the City's banking services. During the past year staff informally extended the bank's contract to allow the bank and staff to resolve open issues regarding the banking services provided within the contract. First Interstate Bank (FIB) has been very accommodating during the past year and has worked to maintain a good working relationship with the City. The staff from First Interstate Bank was very responsive in addressing issues such as the annual deferral of the City's investment earnings credit surplus, the offset of the annual credit cards fees and courier service fees against the investment earnings credit balance, and the setup of a sweep account to allow the City to earn hard dollar investment earnings on excess available funds in the City's account. City Staff is recommending a two-year extension of the banking services contract with First Interstate Bank. Since an effective working relationship has been developed with the bank, staff feels that the additional costs associated with changing banks is not warranted at this time. FISCAL IMPACT: Fees for banking services are off-set against the investment earnings credit ("interest earned") on the City's checking account balance. Attachment: Agreement for Banking Services CITY OF TI~IECULA AGR~~T FOR BANKING SERVICES THIS AGI~I~:~MENT, made and entered into May 9, 1995, by and between the CITY of TEMECULA, a municipal corporation, heteinaft~ rderred to as 'City' and FIRST INTERSTATE BANK OF CALWORNIA, hereinaft~ referred to as *Bank*. L The City is desirous of obtaining the services of Bank to provide certain banking services to City, and Bank is desirous of providing such services. SCOPE OF SERVICES Bank shall provide the services set forth in its original proposal to City dated December 10, 1992, and said pages of which are for an election to be made by City, the election shall be made by the City Treasurer of City. The City Treasurer may also elect to delete any of the services set forth in the attached portion of Exhibit "A" , subject to the notice requirements contained in the Product Agreements described below. Bank may provide additional services under the terms of this Agreement upon the mutual agreement of Bank and City and the approval of the terms and conditions thereof by the City by the City Council of the City of Temecuh. COlVIPENSATION Compensation to Bank for the services provided to this Agreement shall be as set forth in the pricing pwvisions in the attached Exhibit "A ", said provisions of which are incorporated herein by this reference. In the event that services not specified in Exhibit "A" are requested by City, the fees for such services ~nll be negotiated at the time they are added. The Bank shall reserve the right to pass on direct costs associated with Federal and State ~gulations, including Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation charges. Revisions to the compensation hereunder shall be approved by the City Council of the City of Temecula, subject to Bank's unilateral fight to change its fees each luly, commencing July 1994. CITY OF ~ AGREEMENT FOR BANKING SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into May 9, 1995, by and between the CITY of TEMECULA, a :municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City" and FIRST INTERSTATE BANK OF CALIFORNIA, bereinafter referred to as "Bank". The City is desirous of obtaining the services of Bank to provide cerraln banking services to City, and Bank is desirous of providing such services. SCOPE OF SERVICES Bank shall provide the services set forth in its proposal to City dated December 10, 1992, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit 'A' and said pages of which are for an election to be made by City, the election shall be made by the City Treasurer of City. The City Treasurer may also elect to delete any of the services set forth in the above designated portion of Exhibit 'A* , subject to the notice requirements contained in the Product Agreements described below. Bank may provide additional services under the terms of this Agreement upon the mutual agreement of Bank and City and the approval of the terms and conditions thereof by the City by the City Council of the City of Temecula. COMPENSATION Compensation to Bank for the services provided to this Agreemere shah be as set forth in the pricing provisions in the attached Exhibit *A', and the Bank's letter to the City dated December 22, 1992, a copy of which is attached hueto as Exhibit "B* , said provisions of which are inncorporated herein by this rderence. In the event that services not specified in Exhibit *A* are requested by City, the fees for such services shall be negotiated at the time they are added. The Bank shah reserve the right to pass on direa costs associated with Federal and State regulations, including Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation charges. Revisions to the compensation hereunder shall be approved by the City Council of the City of Temecula, subject to Bank's unilateral right to change its fees each July, commencing July 1994. R:IIVOR7'O~LL46EW~ASl~4MI(WV~.A~fV 6/2/96 This .Agreement shall commence on the 9th day of May, 1995 and shall remain and continue in effect until June 30, 1997. Time is of the essence in the performance of this Agreement. EXTENSION Tne term of this Agreement may be extended by City's Treasurer and Bank by agreement in writing with respect to each such extension at least thirty (30) calendar days prior to the date on which this Agreement or an extension thereof would otherwise have terminated. The terms and conditions of the a~reement as so extended shall be as set forth herein except that modifications in the compensation designated in Section HI (Exh~it 'A "), may be made effective for the period of any extension as mutually determined by Bs_nk and the Treasurer of City in writing as a pan of the agreement for the extension of' this Agreement, subject to the approval of the City Council of City. This Agreement extends the current terms under a~reement by and between City and Bank effective May 9, 1995 through June 30, 1997. TERMINATION Any other provision herein to the contrary notwithstanding, and in addition to other methods of termination provided for herein or available under the laws of the State of California, it is agreed that this Agreement shall terminate ninety (90) days after written notice of termination, which may be given by either party to the other party to this Agreement with or without cause. After the expiration of such ninety {90) day period, Bank shall immediately cease all services hereunder except as may be specifically approved by the City. Bank shall be entitled to compensation for all services rendered prior to the terminstion and for any services authorized by City thereafter in accordance with the aforementioned section regarding compensation. NOTICES Any notice required to be given hereunder shall be in writing with copies as directed herein and shall be personally served or given by mall. All notices by mail shall be deemed to have been given when received by the party to be served. Mail notices are to be sent by United States mall, certified and postage prepaid, addressed to the party to the be served as follows: FL. WOR TON L ~4 G ENDA SIBANKING. A GN 5/2/95 TO CITY: City of Temecula Genie Robins, Finance Officer 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 TO BANK: First Intentate Bank Larry Jacobson, Vice President & Manager Temecula Office 26411 Ynez Road Temecula, CA 92591 AND First Interstate Bank Susan M. Cotton, Vice President & Manager Government Services Group 5000 Birch Street, Suite I0,000 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Either party may change its address by notifying the other party of the change of address in writing. Notice shall be deemed communicated when received by the party to be served if served as provided in this section. ATll)RNEY'S FEES In the event that either party hereto fails to comply with any of the terms of this Agreement and the other party commences legal proceedings to enforce any of the tenm of this Agreement or to terminate this Agreement, the prevailing party in such suit shall receive from the other a reasonable sum including atWmey's fees and costs as may be established by the Court or Jury. ASSIGNMENT; SUBCONTRACTS The experience, knowledge, capability and reputation of Bank, its principals sea employees were a substantial inducement for City to enter into this Agreement. Therefore, Bank shall not subco~i~act, assign or otherwise transfer its rights and obligations under this Agreemere without prior written consent of City. Any such subcontractor or assignment without such consent shall be void and shall, at the option of City, teminate this Agreement. It is understood and agreed that for any such services provided to City, with the City's written consent, the full cost of such services are not fixed for any period of time as are Bank provided services, and will be passed along to the City. Such services include, but are not limited W armored caffier, deposit courier, and messenger service. R:WORTONL~AGENDAStB~IVKINO. A~3N ~ EXTENT OF AGREEMENT This document, the portions of Exhibit 'A* and *B* incorporated herein by reference and the 'Cash Management Terms and Conditions* represent the entire integrated Agreement between City and Ban~ and supersede all prior negotiations, represe~t_~ions or agreements, either written or oral. This Agreement and the incorporated portions of Exhibit 'A' and *B' may be amended only by written instrument signed by both City and Ban~. The *Cash Management Terms and Conditions' may be amended only as provided therein. R:WORTONLIAI3ENDASIBANrJNO. AGN r~ IN WITNESS WHEIEOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the date stated above. CITY OF TEMECULA FIRST INTERSTATE BANK City Manager A Municipal Corporation Signed: Title: signed: Title: ATTEST: City Clerk of the City of Temecula APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney of the City of Temecula P,.'V*IOtlTONLb4OENDA~IB4NI(~IO. AON 5/2/96 Fee Schedule Business Accounts- E~i~e J~ ]. ]9~V First Interstate Bank of California FEE SCHEDULE -- BUSINESS ACCOUNTS E. ffech~e Jsdy I. 1~4 T~ese prices are egecti~e as of Jsdy 1.1~4. Unless miwrwrise agreed in ,,ri~ng. prices mind Accmmm AmmbJsb ~ mind rmes ,my ;~mnle m ~ny n~,~ ~itkom nolice. Not ~!I prices m reflet'~ tm thiv list. Ym~ mn t~=mn ~wre~ pr~e ~/ormm~m from yimr Arerest O~ker. 8ervk~ ~ed ~ c~r. ~c~t or ~1~ ~ed ~ ~ ~es. ACCOUNT ANALYSISRATES Receive sccount analysis repom smuau~.is~ cash insrage- merit services used snd account bslss:e informsira. Use invumble bslsncu in your deposit sccoums to generate credit .Sa bankchm o rrm ACCOUNT ANALYS~ RATES Bued on tim av~rqe 91 day T-Bill Auction rm~, dismum Iramira, Prime Rate plus 3% AMOUNT UNIT Ledger0verdra~Rate t.2 Prime Rate plus 3% FDIC' FDIC assessed rate Reserve Requirement' " F~deral Reserve Bank as~m~i rate investable Avenge daily Avm'sge 1. Wem~mfim~$Mmoammm~Ommmmomsmmmimmitmmmmyfimmmmmmiwimimm lm~rmTImmmmmmmmmmammammm'miiml~fmmyom~OIfmmr- 2. Pm. kmmmmimmmdm~mm~i:hFmmmimmmmmmmm~mmm~mmmltm~mm~mmmmimmm m0mei~cmmm~!~-~$mmmegmimm. l~k=, '~ m cmmma-,b-nmmmMmmmmmma~mmhmSmmmk'rm~mimmy --a-,.iomm m. dm~otbdo~imkxm. GENF_~ ACCOUNT SERVICES Receive timely mud mccurmm pinecuing of all deposits and pmid items for youF Demmmd Dt~omit Ac~ounu. Maintain Zao Balsaoe A~;ou~s to fa~iimm excea~ cash invulm~t by ptovidin.~ automa~ funding of your compmmfs distwu,aemmm re:mints and cm~-ntratim of funds from multiple conectioo acca-mt~ mm DEPOSIT SER VICE~ Aoxwmt M-inte,,~ $15.00 Accmm~ Smmmmm .ac!r~c~=l Smm~mm,~t 5.50 81m:ial Smmmmuu 5.50 51mchl Smuummt W'sthout lmms 5.50 Debit Poming 0.13 Stop Payments Autc~a~ Stop Payment 6.00 ^Ut~..*h d StOp Payment Inqu~ 1.00 Mmml Stop Payment 12.00 C, ssh~'s Check S.O0 Check Collection 20.00 Facsimile 6°00 Photocopy 6.00 item or m'-*~ ..,.am '~ i 3. $12 pffimm. with adaily maxbmam of $601~r day pstammsat f~rdmdm i. i! mmmm~mem, m!~aimmm~mm~.Aimo. slmimimm~o, mimm~mm~ "~'-~ perm ZERO BALANCE ACCOUNT ZBAMmmmAccomu M*~n,~w,-,,~e S35.00 zs^ Sutmidimy Ammm Malnst m~am'~t Bminms.J~ _ F-,dimmmmBamkdCalifoam DEPOSITORY SERVICES .educe your check clearing costs and accelerate the avafiabil- ~J of your deposits by delivering high volume deposiu digcfiy aMOU~ teat C!iECK CLEARING Deposit Ticket' Branch $1.3~ per iron 0pcrations Center 1.10 per item Checks Deposited Branch 0Js',,asd~) Local 0.10 per Ban Non-Locsl 0.1l periron On-UsB:31p,m.-10:(X)t,m. 0.035 per iron On-Us 10:01 a.m.-8:30 p.m. 0.0~S per iron Local Clearing House 0.048 pet iron Local Fed 0.055 per iunn Fh-s~ lnenm~ Aff*diae Ci~ 0.055 per immn Other Tramit 0.08 pea' is Travelers Checks 0.0~ per item Excessive Rejects (over 0.7% pet month) 0..$0 per item Deposit Coi~efion 1 ..SOper ~oe 4. A!!depositsafesubjectlo~Depmitdikm~ ~ttwillbe adjumedtothe&gc~u.-~.nominddiL..~'-' exchmbd. S. To emu~eme-dej kdletced~imm mm belteepmed m:m/el lo mmin~ordmmyed~m~d~~ff~o( mcdJxmdlk,wud~m.r. ddepodtmpa)vidaJwMdnmnmdays. RETURNED FFEMS Rengned It=ms $ 5.00 per inn Spec Adv Opt m Multiple Advi~ 1.00 per ~ Maker lafmmgion 0.15 psr ilgm ACTION Special Repom Malzrlnfonnafion 0.15 perftid Deposits R~gi~ Cash Vault Deposit Tu:kn $1.10 per deposit Non-Standard Deposit 5.543 per deposit Deposit Adjuremere 6.25 pe~ adjusnnent Standard CmTency 0.90 per $ l,OOO Non*Standard Curtely 1.20 per Sl,000 Branch ~ 1.25 per SlJ00 Non-Stmdmd Coin-Rolled 7.50 per bag Branch Coin 0. 10 per roll Food Stmnl~ neposie~J Strapped? 0.00 per S 1,000 t,oose 0.00 per Sl,000 coupon. ~landing l_rsO p~ onk= Cmmm 3.00 . per onk= · E~Sc~y 10.00 !~ Standard Currency 0.90 per $1,000 Non-Standard Cunuty 120 per Sl,000 Branch ~ 1.50 !mr Sl,000 Coin/Full Box 3.00 per box Coin/Helf Box 2,00 p~ bdf-box CoinR~ls 0.10 Brm~ Coin 0.2~ l~r roll Brm~b Coin/F,B!! Box 4.2~ !~ ~ mdjmmmdmmlmmmcmmmmm. mlk,,. iemegleed. --. 7.1dmtbeFekrdRmeveBmkiteady. '- Impmvethes:asrspyofyosr~sshfomsstbynsczivisSeslY ~s~t A~. CO~OLL~D D~~ T~s F~t ~t S1~ 1-~,~ 0.1~ 1-~,~ 0.1~ M~y Mini~ 10.~ A~ON ~ ~R) M~y Msint~-~ ~.~ S~ I~ ~ ~1 I~ ~ 0.14 ~o~ s F~t ~t 1~.~ A~ ~ 1~.~ ~ ~d Wilt ~t ~ 1-~,~ 0.15 ~ ~d Wil ~ ~m 1-~,~ 0~ 1-~,~ O~ A~ON ~ ~~(S~~) a.~ ~ ~ ~ ~h~) 0.~ Tmmscsioa Chstges FedmdPaymem aodssrge Stse Payment $ 2.00 per payment Fsx ~ 4.00 per paymint PC Fimsx Mslntmsn,-e 10.00 !~ s:mm~ PC F'-a Trsnss:fim 2.00 per tx~--" !zUNi~TRANI fundsma~straliz~scoamwithoorCashCo~cs'~s6oa AUT01~IATED CLEARING HOUSE (ACH) Semp (One T'mae) Trsnm~i*-ion Setup $2.~).00 -Vendor Setup' f~O.00 ACTION ACH So~ ACTION ACH Data Import - ~ofiwttt ht*,~fisti~m 200.00 Mtmt!~ AC'rlON ACH M,im~m.,~t luput ACTION A(~I ~ Ts ?a": ~ ACH I)dsit/CmdiX 14~ 0.14 ACHDebil/Crs~ 2.,0¢X)-.~,999 0.11 AUTOMATED CLEARING BOUSE (ACB) ¢Comirmed) ACH Debit/Credit On-Us $ 0.0~ per ACTION ACH Debit/Credit 0.25 per item ACTION ACH Debi~t On-Us 0. 15 per ACH Night Cycle Sun:barge 0.02 per inn p.x=paon AC~Debit/CmditRnmn 5.00 per item ACH Debit/Credit Remm Autoroared 3..50 psr No~~cmion of Chan~ 3.00 lzr immmm Nofi~mim of C!mmg~ ACH Dsbit Rsclsm~ 1.25 lm~ ACH Dslmion/l~vmml Amomp-,~! 7.00 lm~ Rssm~<l Ysm~ 15.00 pm~msmpm 9. pkamComactyour,d~ccoent(M~cerfotqulifyinJvemjo~s). CASH CONCENTRATION Concenu'ation Vendor Monfixly M-inWn*s,~e Ctmcmn~on M-infer-qce Co!lcelllr~on Vendor Input Direa Transmission Concenntion Trm~mis*ion ACTION Cash ~ation Tenn~ Locsion n~-ponsd ~ns piem neponed Vo~eOperatorinput t.ocsion neponsd ~nSnemneponsd Touch-Tone Inpm ~nSneMneponzd Reports summary items Prin~d $175.00 per account 100.00 per 100.00 per ctaze~natioa ao:oont 100.00 !~r nmc~mm~on 0.45 per inn 0.45 per itsan 0.85 peritem 0.85 per inn 0.75 psr inn 0.75 per innn 0.06 per inn 0.06 per inn CASll CONCDITRATION (Cramsseal) .Omctdtmmi~m ACH $ 0.22 Conmnmion On-Us 0.18 ~mion DTC 1.10 !n-xeep6,,n l~onming ~a6on Rennns 25.00 ~ation Retnrns Auto 25.00 ~atlon P, smms DTC 50.00 ACTION Cash Concsm~on Lontion ~ 3.00 Insrim ELECTRO~C DATA INTERCHANGE (EDI) FIRST INTERSTATE CASH CONCENTRATOR (FICC) Terminallnitia~Sstvicss ~ W'n~ Rspetitive 1-100 7.00 101-500 6.50 501+ 6.00 Outping W'~e Nen-~ve 1-100 10.00 101-500 9_q0 501+ 9.00 Iramini W'nt Nm-Repetifive 8.50 Oq, oing Wins Repir 6.00 perm WIRE TRANSFER SERVICES (Conanued) Voice Initiated Services ' TeleTranSfer $15.00 per ~ TeleTranSfer Book Transfer 7.00 per wire International Wim'USD or FX) 25.00 per wire Draw Down Wire 8.00 per wire Automatic Stm~_in.* Invxuaim 10.00 per wi~ ~g Wire Automaid 7.50 per wire ]ncom_ing Wh'e Manu~ 10.00 per wire Draw Down Wire 15.00 per wire Administrative Messages Outgoing ~.W .LET. 2~.00 peg wire Terminal 1.50 per advice T~iephone 10.00 per advice S.W.I.F.T. 7.50 per advice Informafio~ Rc~or~ng Wh~ Inquh~ 0~0 pa inquh~ INFORMATION SERVICES Access previous day account information at Fint hunrote or other banks esrly morning by ccmaputef. termind or much-tone telephone. Monitor intrsday positions with Current Day Balance and Transaction services. PREVIOUS DAY BALANCK/TRANSACTION RKPORTING SKitVICES Standard Reportin.a (up to 10 accoums) Aummatic Balance Repoaing BAI Format Repov~_e Voice Balance Repoaing Transaction Fees Summary Items 099 per inn Detail Inns 0.14 per item CURRENT DAY BALANCE/TRANSACTION REPORTING SERVICES Cuffent Day; BAI Form~ Voice S30.00 per user Tran-- ~ Fees Detail lunns 0. 14 per item OTHER INFORMATION SERVICES TrmmctiouFees Smnmsry Items Outbound 0~0 per item DetaillnmOutbound 0.25 peritan .- ;xte,,4.d Data Storage 20.00 Transactim: Search Found 1..~0 Fax Delivery 0.50 savicefmaudli~immfmoflh~Finthmp,m_Bamkofm INTERNATIONAL SERVICES per gore Muimizemepaxtuctivizyofyourfundswimmiavr.-m-a w-,,-temem~~yeih~tomeetyour company's goals and raluimnems. For mote htf~,,aim, pleme contact your Acaxmt Offier. LOCKBOX SERVICF~ ~elerate availability of customer reqfin-m-es, reduce ,~:eivable ~-qS costs, and improve nmnagement of receivable accounm with Firit lnlersmle's Locidxwt mn'vic~ film AIIOtlWT WBOLES,tLm'- LOCKBOX Lockbox Monltdy Msin~m,-qt'e $160.00 Items Processed Basic Hocessing 0.36 Basic ProcessinS and lYmxocopy 0.45 per month ]VlaintepsqCt DqxBitReVoning Talephone ACT]ON Special Fax _160.00 0.015 40.00 pernmmh 0,07 perline 210.00 per momh RETAIl. LOCKBOX MERCHANT SERVICES Receive a full range of Debit and Credit Card services for merchants across the Fwst inl~,dale mminy. Formote information, please contact your Account Offmer. RECONCILIATION SERVICES Automatically reconcile your deposit and ~ account activity with timely infofmadon fnnxn ourdepMit symnas. film MIOIJNT ACCOUNT RECONCILIATION Setup $100.00 per acemint Full Account Rea~qi*Hms 100.00 per acamt Tranwmieilm 0.08 ~ ~ Clinch Paid with Tape 0.09 per RECONf~!I J&TION bIKRVICF.,S (Contimed) Patvial Accmn Reco,~'Bmion $ 60.00 per account Chech Paid 0.07 per inn Additional Reconciliation Services AdditimalRepons 8.00 Ferrelmrt Data Transmission Output 15.00 nmtsmission 0.005 per item 0.01 per item 0.01 per item Check Sating 0.05 peritem Depmit Recmac~is~m ~5.00 per sccomst DqxmitsPooted 0.10 per item Diskeae0m~ 35.00perdisken~ PC BASED RECONt~uJ&TION SOF!lVARE AccmetCbecimPaid $0.07 per item !demthly ~ 10.00 per mccmmt TRUST SEI'VICES Wwk ~ knowkdSeabk, uf~ prof.~..-k m d.ila ammlamSrmtomeetyourcomlmy'smedsm!~jL:'~u. OurTmstDt,. m,ntoffenafullrmgeofEmpioyeeBenefit, Cmtody,~Tmst and Stock T~ services. For Ym,,.,,,~mayM4ktimdmlkdaym itmislmmmdl~/dsmmicw otlmrmmawatmms~rmelmmam ..... mamdl~mtatm imdmmmmmymmhmmMmmmdqmmimdloramBmmmimimm '.. makinlmdaciaimmdialmeranilmfar~dmmila~fmmlsmm~ Im,,,~,mmsyaimimmmmlmmmaiiamfmmi~_ -wm,-.dlm, limmfmmmmoflbmi0mm. mmdmommw/mmmmmmf ' ' ' mmmmmlM "" .~': ' l'Vkmqmmmmd~mamimf, mmchmddmmmmmmmm' ' K -ram "~ . f~im~LC ' m~qMmmimglmmmmdmmmmymmmmltimmmpmmimllmimtmm~, ..... FmmmtimmmmmmomBmmmkmmmmtlmmiSMmdimm:aydmmm~mymmrmmmmmmtbmm$,' "::'~ !kmmk~-'-pmmm/mmlmmmm(m4.,!mmmmSm, mmmmil. mmmim. mm.)immmmmud ' .~ mymmrMimdf. Ymmmmy, m, mmlmmmmlmmmmdmmmSmmlmimmlm}mmr ' .:~ mmmwMmmlmlmmvidmmr. /" ':-~ ByamVqmymmmmaw~MmalmrmWOO)d.N ..:,~ IMlmmd llty lR. tJm B mld i l MIImjn, vdlkh l fJllm - -.. ?; ~ : , ~ "_ aad,,,s~, " -byamllmwmm}musmaRntlammm Immlc. lmtemlymd,,,.m' -lainrail. . .'-? ,.r,,~, ITEM 7 APPROVAL E~~C~ CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFI CITY MANAG CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer May 9, 1995 "Please Save Lives - Don't Drink and Drive" PREPARED BY: Martin C. Lauber, Traffic Engineer RECOMMENDATION: The Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommends that the City Council approve the "Please Save Lives - Don't Drink and Drive" sign program proposed by the Temecula Community Partnership. BACKGROUND: The Temecula Community Partnership - Community Committee, has contacted the Traffic Division of the Public Works Department regarding the installation of "Please Save Lives - Don't Drink and Drive" signs. The Traffic Division was not familiar with accepted practices regarding the use of signs of this type. Staff has contacted 16 cities within Southern California and found that none were currently using similar signs, but that many traffic engineers would consider their use if requested. The proposed signs are not official traffic control devices recognized by the State of California Department of Transportation, therefore there are no guidelines for use. The proposed sign design was formulated during a workshop set-up by the Public/Traffic Safety Commission (See Attached). The City has previously allowed similar informational type signs, in limited use, such as the "Buckle-Up For Safety" signs. The proposed sign locations were derived from input provided by the Public/Traffic Safety Commission, Temecula Police and the Temecula Community Partnership - Community Committee, and are shown on the attached exhibit. -i- r:~aldtpt~95~O50g~biddti.~m/a~ FISCAL IMPACT: The Temecula Community Partnership is offering to bear the cost of all signs required to remind our citizens of the dangers of drinking and driving. The Partnership's approved budget will be able to cover the cost of seven (7) signs. The Department of Public Works, Maintenance Division will mount all signs on existing sign posts or street light poles. ATTACHMENTS: Proposed Sign - "Please Save Lives - Don't Drink and Drive" Proposed Sign Locations =2- r:~agdtpt~95%,OSO9~dr~n~d-i.agn/ajp ! CITY OF TEMECULA Proposed Sign Locations ITEM 8 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPRnVAI CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer May 9, 1995 Acceptance of Public Improvements in Parcel Map No. 22629 PREPARED BY: -~'~Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council ACCEPT the public improvements in Parcel Map No. 22629, AUTHORIZE reduction in Faithful Performance Security amounts for the improvement of streets and drainage, AUTHORIZE the release of the Subdivision Monumentation security amount, DIRECT the City Attorney to prepare reconveyance documents, and DIRECT the City Clerk to so notify the Developer. BACKGROUND: On October 22, 1992, the City Council entered into subdivision agreements with: Jack B. Koczarski 164 Lounsbury Road Trumbull, CT 06611 for the improvement of street and drainage, end subdivision monumentation in Parcel Map No. 22629. Securities for these obligations were' posted by lien agreement end a grant deed was granted to the City for that purpose. The secured amounts are as follows: Street and Drainage Improvements-Faithful Performance Street and Drainage Improvements-Labor and Material Subdivision Monumentation $34,500 17,250 1,210 The grant deed was executed and delivered under the condition that it shall be null end void upon the full end faithful performance of the terms and conditions of the Subdivision Improvement Agreement. The deed covered both of the pertinent parcels prior to the recordation of Parcel Map No. 22629, Parcel 3 and Lot "C" of Parcel Map No. 9197. -1- r.~egdmt~SlO4251m2262S~ee The following items have been completed by the developer in accordance with the approved plane: Street and drainage improvements within Parcel Map No. 22629 Survey Monuments within Parcel Map No. 22629 Staff has inepected and verified the public improvements. The Public Works Department therefore recommends acceptance of the public improvements, reduction in Faithful Performance secured amount to the ten-percent warranty level, and initiation of the one-year warranty period. Therefore it is appropriate to reduce the Faithful Performance security amount as follows: Street and drainage Improvements ~31,050 The Faithful Performance secured amount for the warranty period is as follows: Street and drainage Improvements $3,450 Staff will examine the value of the parcels and analyze release by reconveyance to the developer of several of the four subdivided parcels and coordinate with the City Attorney for recommendation to the City Council. The objective is to retain the minimum number of parcels necessary to assure that the value of land the City holds is sufficient to meet any claims against either the Faithful Performance warranty or Labor and Materials security amounta~ The developer was also required to post Labor and Material security to ensure payment to suppliers and workers. This security is maintained in effect for a period of time determined by the Subdivision Improvement Agreement after the City Council has acceded the public improvements. The affected streets are not being accepted into the City maintained street system at this time. The streets within the subdivision are portions of Via Telesio and Green Tree Road. FISCAL IMPACT: None. Attachments: Location Map -2- r:.%egdq~gb'~O42b'~xt~22629,eee PARCF, I, MAP NO, 29.629 Location Map ITEM 9 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL: CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFIC CITY MANAGE CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer May 9, 1995 Supplement No. 006 to Local Agency - State Agreement for Federal Aid Project No. STPLN-5459, I-15/I-215 Corridor Study RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 95- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING SUPPLEMENT NO. 006, TO LOCAL AGENCY AGREEMENT NO. 08-5459, BETWEEN THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR FEDERAL AID PROJECT NO. STPLN-5459, I- 1 511-215 CORRIDOR STUDY. BACKGROUND: On March 23, 1993 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 93-26 approving "Local Agency/State Agreement No. 08-5459 between the State Department of Transportation and the City. The agreement establishes the Federal Funding provisions (Master Agreement). The agreement and the resolution provide for funding future projects by supplemental agreements for individual Faderally Funded Project. The current project, I-15/I-215 Corridor Study has been approvad for Federal funding in the amount of $100,000, representing 88.53% eligible costs of the estimated $112,956 total cost. The project is a joint effort by the cities of Temecula and Murrieta, with the City of Temecula as the lead agency. The balance of the local funding in the amount of ~ 12,956 is the responsibility of the two (2) cities, each participating in the amount of ~6,478 or 50% of the local share. -1- r:%agdrpt%95%0509~.l-15egrmt.euplejp FISCAL IMPACT: The project is being funded through the grant of $100,000 and the local share of $12,956 with the City of Temecula being responsible for 50% or $6,478 of that local share. The project is budgeted for this Fiscal Year, Account No. 210-165-633-5802,1-15 Corridor Study (Capital Improvement Project Fund, Public Works Projects). Source of funds for the local share of $6,478 is funded through Development Impact Fees. Attachments: Resolution No. 95- -2- r:%egdrpt%95%O509%l-15agnnt.euplejp RESOLIFrlON NO. 95- A RESOLUTION OF ~ CITY COUNCIL OF TVrF~ CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING SUPPt.EMENT NO. 006, TO LOCAL AGENCY AGI~EEMENT NO. 085459, BETWEEN THF~ STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE C1TY OF TEMECULA FOR FEDERAL AID PRO~ECT NO. STPLN-54b'9, 1-15/I-215 CORRIDOR STUDY. The City Council of the City of Temecula does resolve, determine and order as follows: WHEREAS, City Council at this regular meeting of March 23rd, 1993 adopted Resolution No. 93-26. WHKREAS, ~aid Resolution approved the Local Agency/State Agreement No. 08-5459.' W~'~EAS, said Resolution provided for supplemental agreements to be adopted by the Council for each individual project which utilizes the Federal Funds. WHEREAS, City has applied for Federal Funds to lxafotm the study on 1-15FI-215 Corridor, Federal Aid Project No. STPLN-5459. WHEREAS, these funds are available and subject to Program Supplement No. 006 for Local Agency State Agreement for Federal Aid Project No. STPLN-5459. NOW, 'FHEI~v]?OR, BE 1T RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Temecula, as follows: Section 1. That the City Council appwve and authorize execution of Program Supplement No. 006 to Local Agency State Agreement for Federal Aid Project No. STPLN-5459. Section 2. Authorize the Mayor to execute said Agreement Section 3. The City Clerk sha, codify the adoption of this resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOFrED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 9th day of May, 1995. ATTEST: Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor June S. Greek City Clerk [SEAL] - 1 - r:%egdfpt%95%0509%1-15agnnt.euplajp STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No.95- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 9th day of May, 1995 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILM~-MBERS: COUNCIMEMBERS: COUNCIt4~MBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: -2- r:%sgdrpt%g5%OSO9%l-15agnnt.sup/ejp ITEM 10 APPRO L CITY ATTORNER~~ FINANCE OFFIC CITY MANAGE CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: (~ City Manager/City Council Shawn D Nelson of Community  . , Director Services May 9, 1995 SUBJECT: Summary on the Interim Fire Station PREPARED BY: ~(~'/Phyllis L. Ruse, Senior Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive and file the summary for the interim Fire Station located at Linfield School. BACKGROUND: On January 17, 1995, the City Council directed staff to locate a site and construct an interim fire station on the east side of Interstate 15. The City Council appropriated $256,000 for the lease, site improvements and staffing costs through June 30, 1995, and directed staff to open this interim facility by April 1, 1995. Staff investigated available sites, selecting Linfield School as the best location and most cost effective to meet the City's goals. A lease agreement was negotiated and the temporary station was constructed and opened for service on March 31, 1995. The station will house a three to four person company, as well as the new fire engine purchased by the City. The interim fire station will be operating for 12-16 months, while a permanent station is being designed and constructed on Pauba Road, just west of Margarita Road. The summary of costs to construct and place this facility into operation for three months in FY 94/95 is as follows: Site Improvements Lease with Linfield Modular Units (lease) Modular Units (one time set up costs) Engine Port Fumiture, Fixtures and Equipment 38,543 1,800 6,900 11,002 5,219 9.756 Sub-Total $ 73,220 Staffing Costs $189,780 TOTAL .$256.000 FISCAL IMPACT: The total cost of establishing an interim fire station and staffing through June 30, 1995 is $256,000. $256,000 was appropriated from the City's General Fund reserve. ITEM 11 APPROVAL CITY ATTORN~ FINANCE OFFIGE CITY MANAGE CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Council Ronald E. Bradley, City Manager May 9, 1995 City Attorney Service Analysis PREPARED BY: Mary Jane McLarney, Assistant City Manager Grant M. Yates, Human Resources Administrator RECOMMENDATION: Based on the results of this analysis, staff is recommending that City Attorney services continue to be provided on a contract basis. In addition, the recommendation includes retaining Peter Thorson, and Burke, Williams and Sorenson, as the City Attorney. BACKGROUND: Since incorporation, City Attorney services have been provided by the firm of Burke, Williams and Sorenson. Peter Thorson, a Partner in the Firm and director of the firm's public law division, has served as Temecula's City Attorney since May 10, 1994. Burke, Williams and Soreneon has provided the City with a full range of legal services including: general government, redevelopment, special projects (including municipal code codification), general litigation, insurance litigation, special districts, community services and planning. DISCUSSION: The legal authority for the City Attorney is found in the Temecula Municipal Code. According to Chapter 2.24.010 of the Municipal Code - the City Attorney's Office shall consist of the City Attorney and such assistants as may be authorized by the City Council. The functions of the Office of the City Attorney outlined in the Municipal Code are as follows: (1) Advise the Council and all City Officers in all matters of law pertaining to their offices. (2) Furnish legal services at all meetings of the Council, except when excused or disabled, and give advice or opinion on the legality of all matters under consideration by the Council, Boards and Commissions, or Officers of the City. (3) Prepare and/or approve all ordinances, resolutions, agreements, contracts and other legal instruments as shall be required for the proper conduct of the business of the City and approve the form of all contracts, agreements and bonds given to the City. (4) Perform such other legal duties as may be required by the Council or as necessary to complete the performance of the foregoing functions. CITY ATTORNEY CONTRACT FEE AND SERVICE PROVISIONS The City entered into a letter of agreement with Burke, Williams and Sorenson on July 12, 1991, which set the monthly retainer {between the firm and the City) at $3,150.00 for 35 hours of "General Counsel" work, Additional services, in excess of 35 hours, to be billed on an hourly basis of $115,00 for the City Attorney and Assistant City Attorney. Legal work, performed by other members of the firm, to be billed at each attorney's standard billing rate - currently ranging between $115,00 and $225,00 per hour, The legal services to be performed by the City Attorney under contract include: 1) The preparation of ordinances, resolutions, orders, agreements, forms, notices, declarations, certificates and other documents required by the City. 2) Attendance at all meetings of the City Council, Redevelopment Agency and the Planning Commission for the City; and all other meetings of City boards, commissions, and committees, when so requested by the City Council or the City Manager. 3) Rendering legal advice and opinions concerning legal matters that affect the City, including new legislation and court decisions. 4) Representing the City in litigation involving the City, including both prosecution and defense, except workers' compensation matters, 5) Attorneys will not serve as bond counsel for municipal financing matters except as directed by the City Council. OTHER LEGAL SERVICES UTILIZED BY THE CITY In addition to contract City Attorney services, the City also uses other law firms, from time to time, for matters in which Burke, Williams and Sorenson may not have special expertise or where they may have a conflict. Examples include: Legal services for personnel related issues are provided by Jeffrey Freedman from the Los Angeles firm of Rexon, Freedman, Klepetar, and Hambleton. Legal services for certain redevelopment issues am being handled by Kane, Ballmer & Berkman. This firm has worked with the City on the stipulated judgment, INTRODUCTION The demand for City Attorney services has been steadily increasing since 1991. The City has grown in population, staff needs and complexity of issues which, in turn, has increased the demands placed on the City Attorney. The following analysis will attempt to closely compare costs of in-house versus contract services. This information must be prefaced with the understanding that there are pros and cons associated with each service delivery method and these factors must be considered, along with the bottom line, in reviewing in-house versus contract services. COST ANALYSIS: CONTRACT SERVICES The Actual cost to the City for all eandces provided by Burke, Williams and Sorenson is detailed as follows: FY 1991-92 e231,759 FY 1992-93 $503,314 FY 1993-94 e561,438 Approximately 37% of all charges in FY 1993-94 are related to litigation and claims. Although litigation expanses are unpredictable from year to year, it is reasonable to assume that these costs will continue at some level regardless of the method of providing City attorney services. : The projected budget for general government expanses has actually decreased since 1991. This can be explained, in part, by tighter accounting procedures that spread the charges to the appropriate file and the development of an internal service fund for insurance and litigation related expanses. The general government budget since 1991 is as follows: FY 1992-93 FY 1993-94 FY 1994-95 FY 1995-96 ~358,305 (Actual) ~341,419 (Actual) ~288,000 (Budgeted) ~250,000 (Proposed) The remainder of attorney charges are related to other areas including: special financing districts, litigation, community services and redevelopment agency expanses. SERVICE LEVELS The number of service hours billed, for all services during FY 1993-94, totaled 3,944 hours. This calculates out to an average of 76 hours par week, which is slightly less than two (2) full-time attorneys. IN-HOUSE CiTY ATTORNFY COSTS The following will detail the costs associated with bringing this function in-house. These expenditures only include the cost of the City Attorney, one (1) Assistant City Attorney and one (1) Legal Secretary. As noted previously, Temecula is generating enough work to keep two full-time attorneys busy, Therefore, the Assistant City Attorney position is included to accurately compare the costs of the two service delivery methods. IN-HOUSE START UP AND OPERATING EXPENSES SALARY EXPENSES NOTES City Attorney Salary Benefit Costs Assistant City Attorney Benefit Costs Legal Secretary Benefit Costs SUB-TOTAL $96,424 33,748 87,216 30,526 37,361 13.076 $298,351 Salaries based on attached salary survey. Benefits calculated at 35% of salary. OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE EXPENSES NOTES Auto Allowance $ 4,800 Telephones 2,000 Training 8,000 Dues and Subscriptions 11,000 Office Supplies 1,500 Postage 1,000 Professional Meetings 1,000 SUB-TOTAL $ 29,300 Allowance for City Attorney and Assistant. See attached subscription listing START UP EXPENSES NOTES Equipment $ 15,000 Law Library 69.100 SUB-TOTAL $ 84,100 Three computer stations, software, cabinets, etc. See attached listing. TOTALCOSTS $411.751 HIRING OF PARA-LEGAL Staff has reviewed the option of hiring one para-legal employee who could possibly reduce the amount of research time the City Attorney needs to spend on issues; thereby, reducing the legal expenditures. The para-legal employee could utilize the current law library and obtain needed office support and supplies from either the City Clerk's Office and/or the City Manager's Office. The annual salary and benefits for this position is estimated at approximately $60,000; however, we were unable to find a comparable position when conducting a salary survey. At this time, it is staff's recommendation not to hire 8 para-legal employee. The duties of the para-legal would be primarily to complete contracts and conduct general legal research on jssues. The City has standard contract forms and all departments are well versed in the procedure for completing the contracts; therefore, many of the responsibilities that a para-legal would perform are currently being handled on a department level. In addition, Burke, Willjams and Sorenson has proposed training sessions be conducted twice a year to further assist staff in understanding the requirements the City's standard agreements. These training sessions would be offered to the City at no cost and will allow staff to continue to be effective in handling this responsibility. Burke, Williams and Sorenson has also offered to provide staff basic training in current municipal legal issues, which could-further lessen the need for a para-legal employee and enable staff to respond to potential legal issues before they become problems without extensive City Attorney time. CONCLUSION: A major advantage of hiring a City Attorney and accompanying staff is increased accessibility for City staff. However, this can also become a disadvantage as the City Attorney's Office may be relied upon to do administrative work that does not require an Attorney. Another advantage of continuing with a contract City Attorney is the City's ability to tap into the expertise of many subject matter experts who work in the firm. In addition, by contracting with a large firm, the City will benefit from the resources that a large firm can provide. As previously mentioned, the City will still experience litigation related expenses regardless of how City Attorney services are delivered. Therefore, by adding the 37% litigation expense, the in-house costs (~564,099)are comparable to contract charges (e561,438). Based upon this information, it is staff's recommendation that we retain the services of a' contract City Attorney. Another important consideration is that by retaining a contract firm, the City can have complete control over expenditures. This can be very important if, at some point in the future, the City does experience financial hardships, we can control the amount of work given to the Attorney. If we had a staff attorney, it is more difficult to reduce expenditures without layoffs. Attorney services and corresponding costs are based on usage. Therefore, a reduction in cost is contingent upon management and the City Council making a coordinated effort to reduce requested legal services. To address this issue, staff is proposing that the City Council adopt the attached cost- containment policy that requires approval of a department director before an employee can directly access City Attorney services. We would be happy to answer any questions on this information and await further direction. Attachment TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ITEM 1 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT HELD APRIL 11, 1995 A regular meeting of the Temecula Community Services District was called to order at 8:56 PM at the Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. President Ron Roberrs presiding. ROLL CALL PRESENT: 5 ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: Lindemans, Mu~oz, Parks, Roberrs, Stone DIRECTORS: None Also present were General Manager Ronald E. Bradley, General Counsel Peter Thorson and City Clerk June S. Greek. PUBLIC COMMENTS None given. CONSENT CALENDAR City Clerk June Greek stated she has a request to speak on Item No. 6. It was moved by Director Parks, seconded by Director Stone to approve Consent Calendar Items 1-5. The motion was unanimously carried. 1. Minutes 1.1 1.2 Approve the minutes of February 28, 1995; Approve the minutes of March 14, 1995. Comolqtion and Acceotance of the Loma Linda Park Phase II Imorovements - Project No. PW94-O~CSD 2.1 File the Notice of Completion and release the Performance Bond. 2.2 Accept a one (1) year Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract value upon acceptance of the improvements. 2.3 Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after acceptance of the improvements in no liens have been filed to that date. R:%agenda.csd~041195 I 5/1/95 Completion and Accemance of the Soorts Park Sloe Repair Improvements - Project No. PW93-06CSD 3.1 File the Notice of Completion and release the Performance Bond. 3.2 Accept a one (1) year Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract value upon the acceptance of the improvements. 3.3 Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after acceptance of the improvements if no liens have been filed to that date. Comoletion and Acceotance of the Kent Hintergardt Memorial Park Imorovements - Project No. PW94-01CSD 4.1 File the Notice of Completion and release the Performance Bond. 4.2 Accept a one (1) year Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract value upon acceptance of the improvements. 4.3 Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after acceptance of the improvements if no liens have been filed to that date. Senior Center Advisory Committee 5.1 Authorize the Community Services Commission to appoint five (5) senior citizen residents to serve on an ad-hoc Senior Citizen Advisory Committee. e Contract for July 4th. 1995 Fireworks Show Wayne Hall, 42131 Agena, requested that citizens drive carefully during the fireworks display so that safety of the pedestrians can be insured. Director Mu~oz asked if there is a plan in place for traffic control at the conclusion of the fireworks display. Community Services Director Shawn Nelson stated last year's estimated crowd was approximately 15,000 people. He explained that coordination with police and fire is taking place to make the event as safe as possible. Director MuSoz asked which intersections will have traffic control officers present and if an actual plan is prepared. Mr. Nelson stated he is not prepared to discuss specifics of the plan this evening, however he would be happy to provide that information to the Council. General Manager Bradley suggested that the Council come in to City Hall and discuss their suggestions individually. R:%aOenda.cm:l%041195 2 511/95 It was moved by Director Lindemans, seconded by Director Stone to approve staff recommendation as follows: 6.1 Award a contract of $17,000 to Robert Caran Productions to produce the City of Temecula's 1995 July 4th Fireworks Show. The motion was unanimously carried. GENERAL MANAGERS REPORT None given. DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT Community Services Director Shawn Nelson announced the new van for the Senior Center arrived and thanked the Ranchorl'emecula Women's Club for their donation. He also thanked the firm of Alhadeff, Cannon and Rose for their assistance towards the purchase. Mr. Nelson reported this will allow the City to expand opportunities to seniors who could not otherwise use these services. BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS Director Parks reported he attended the dedication of Boys and Girls Club Saturday and over 2,000 children are signed up and participating in that facility. He asked that additional sites be set aside to provide these types of services. It was moved by Director Stone, seconded by Director Parks to adjourn at 9:08 PM to a meeting on April 25, 1995, 8:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. The motion was unanimously carried. Ron Roberts, President ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk R:~genda.ced%041195 3 511/95 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT HELD APltlL_':~5, 1995 A regular meeting of the Temecula Community Services District was called to order at 8:22 PM at the Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. President Ron Roberts presiding. ROLL CALL: PRESENT: 5 DIRECTORS: Lindemans, Mufioz, Parks, Stone, Roberrs ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None Also present were City Manager Roneld E. Bradley, City Attorney Peter M. Thorson and Deputy City Clerk/Deputy Board Secretary Susan W. Jones. PUBLIC COMMENTS None given. CONSENT CALFNDAR It was moved by Director Lindemans, seconded by Director Stone to approve Consent Calendar Items Nos. 1, 2 and 3. The motion was unanimously carried. 1. Minutes 1.1 Approve the minutes of March 28, 1995. 2. Amendment to Park Imorovement Agreement - Kaufman and Broad 2.1 Approve the amendment to Park Land Improvement Agreement which would extend the dedication date of the 2.8 acre neighborhood park within Tract 23125-3. 3. Award of Construction Contract for Rancho Califomia Soorts Park Improvement Proiect - Project No. PW94-07CSD 3.1 Award a contract for Rancho California Sports Park Improvement Project, Project PW94-O7CSD, to E. A. Mendoza Contracting for $1,452,000.O0and authorize the President to execute the contract; 3.2 Authorize the General Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $145,200.00 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount. Minutes%4%25%95 -1 - 05/01 fi5 Citv Council Minute8 Aoril 25, 1995 GENERAL MANAGERS REPORT - Bradley None given. DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT - Nelson Director of Community Services Nelson stated the award of contract for Rancho California Sports Park Improvements Project will be to construct the parking improvements, a new skateboard park facility end · roller hockey rink on the easterly portion of the Rancho California Sports Park; staff will move forward with the pre-construction meeting; staff hopes to break ground on this project within the next 45 days with completion sometime in the winter of 1996. BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS None given. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Director Stone, seconded by Director Parks to adjourn at 8:24 PM to a meeting on May 9, 1995, 8:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. ATTEST: Ron Roberts, President June S. Greek, City Clerk/Community Services District Secretary Minutee%4%25%gS -2- 05/01 ITEM 2 APPRO CITY ATTORNI~R~ FINANCE OFFIC CITY MANAGE TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: PREPARED BY: RECOMMENDATION: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT Board of Directors Ronald E. Bradley, General Manager May 9, 1995 TCSD Proposed Rates and Charges for FY 1995-96 ~,~~ Beryl Yasinosky, Management Assistant That the Board of Directors: Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO CSD 95- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ON THE RLING OF A REPORT ON THE PROPOSED RATES AND CHARGES FOR FISCAL YEAR 1995-96 AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING IN CONNECTION THEREWITH 2. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. CSD 95- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AMENDING THE PROCEDURES FOR APPEALING THE APPLICATION OR IMPLEMENTATION OF RATES AND CHARGES AGAINST PROPERTY WITHIN THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT BACKGROUND: The Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) operates under the authority of Community Services District Law and provides parks and recreation, median and slope maintenance, street and traffic signal lighting, recycling and refuse collection, and street and road maintenance services in the City of Temecula. The boundaries of the TCSD are contiguous with the City, and the City Council also serves as the Board of Directors of the TCSD. The six current service levels of the TCSD include: 1. Community Services, Parks, and Recreation.. 2. Service Level A - Arterial Street Lights, Traffic Signals and Medians· 3. Service Level B- Residential Street Lights. 4. Service Level C - Perimeter Landscaping and Slope Maintenance. 5. Service Level D - Recycling, Refuse Collection and Street Sweeping. 6. Service Level R - Streets and Roads. Additionally, the TCSD proposes to amend the appeal procedure for the TCSD Rates and Charges by extending the deadline to December I st for accepting appeals. Since the property tax bills are mailed in October of each fiscal year, staff feels that the current deadline of September 1 st does not allow the property owner the opportunity to review their respective property tax bill. Therefore, extending the deadline to December I st would provide staff with the ability to process any necessary corrections resulting from the property tax bills. The TCSD is also required to complete an annual levy process which includes adopting a resolution accepting the filing of a report on the proposed rates and charges necessary tO provide the aforementioned services; noticing every property owner in the City; and conducting a pubic hearing to consider approving the proposed rates and charges. Staff recommends that the Board of Directors adopt the resolution to accept the filing of the report on the proposed rates and charges for FY 1995-96 and schedule a public hearing concerning these issues for June 13, 1995. Staff will then proceed with noticing every property owner in the City regarding the proposed rates and charges and the June 13th public hearing. Further, it is recommended that Board of Directors adopt the resolution to amend the appeal process. FISCAL IMPACT: The revenue generated from the TCSD FY 1995-96 Rates and Charges will fund the parks and recreation; median and slope maintenance; street lighting; recycling and refuse collection; and street and road maintenance services in the City of Temecula. The proposed TCSD levy budget for FY 1995-96 is ~5,317,267. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution of Intention for FY 1995-96 TCSD Rates and Charges. Resolution to amend the appeal procedure. Preliminary annual levy report for FY 1995-96. RESOLUTION NO. CSD 9~- A RESOLUTION OF ~ BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF T~tg 'r]~4ECUI~ COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ON THF~ Ftt,~G OF A F~'3N)RT ON Tffg PROPOSED SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC m~ARING IN CONNECTION Tm~Ewrr-- WHEREAS, upon inanpomtion of the City of Temecula, California (the "City") effective December 1, 1989, voters also appwved the formation of the Temecuh Community Services Distdct (the "TCSD"), which has the same area and boundaries as the City and whose Board of Directors (the "Board*) consists of the members of the City Council of the City; and Va-IEREAS, the TCSD piol~ses to continne such rates and charges for community services and parks, recreation facilities, services and programs, operation, maimenance, service and atJmini.¢aation of street lighting, traffic signals, slope maintenance, recycling and refuse programs, and street and road improvements (the "Services and/or Facilities*), for those areas speci~ally benefitted thereby and charged by the TCSD for such services in prior fisal years; and ~, the Board bats requested the pzeparation of a report for Fiscal Year 1995/96 containing the proposed rates and charges, for filing with the Secretary of the TCSD pursuant to the Community Services District Law being Division 3 of Title 6 of the Government Code of the State of C~llfornia, COmme~lCing with Section 61000 (the "Act"); NOW, THEREFORE, THE BOARD COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT DOES ORDER AS FOtlOWS: OF DIRECTORS OF THE TI~I~CULA HEREBY, RESOLVE, DIE[ERMINE AND SECTION 1. Pursuant to Section 61621.2 of the Act, and Engineer's Report for Collection for the Fiscal Year 1995-96 (the "Report") has been presented and flied with the Secretary of the TCSD. The P, qx~ coBrains a description of the proposed Services and/or Facilities to be provided and proposed rates and charges for such Services and/or Facilities and a description of the parcels subject to rates and charges. A m,mmary of the Report containing the proposed rates and charges is attached hereto as Exhibit A, entitled "Project Sum~mry" and is incorporated herein by reference. The Report is based upon a budget adopted by the Board for the proposed Services and/or Facilities for specific areas where such Services and/or Facilities are provided, including necessary staff and admini.qrative expenses. The Report is hereby inlimina~y approved and adopted and is on file in the Office of the City Clerk. Reference to the Report is hereby made for all pafficulan. SNCTION 2. The TCSD proposes to collect the rates and charges at the same time, in the same manner, by the same persons and together with and not separately from, the property taxes collected within the TCSD. These rates and charges shall be delinquent at the same time and thereafter be subject to the same delinquency penalties as such property taxes. All hws applicable to the levy, collection and enforcement of property taxes, including but not limited to, those pertaining to the matters of delinquency, correction, cancellation, refund and redemption, are applicable to these rates and charges, except for California Revenue and Taxation Code Section 4831. However, if for the first year the charge is levied, the real property to which the charge relates has been transfen'ed or conveyed to a bona fide purchaser for value, or if a lien of a bona fide encumbrancer for value has been created and attaches thereon, prior to the date on which the first installment of such taxes appear on the roll, then the charge, or the delinquency in that charge, nssesse6 pursuant to this section shall not result in a lien against the pfop~ty, but instead shall be transferred to the unsecured roll for collection. SPaON 3. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT A PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER WnL BE HED BY THE BOARD OF DIRFJ~ORS OF THE TEiVIBCULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ON ~ 13, 1995, AT 8:00 P.M., OR AS SOON TI-I~.F_AFTER AS FEASIBLE IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS LOCATED IN THE TEMBCUI. A COMMUNITY RF_ERHATION CENTER, 30875 RANCHO VISTA ROAD, TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA. At the public hearing, the Board of Directors of the TCSD will review and consider any protests received in writing by the Secretary prior to the scheduled hearing. Public comment regarding the Report by all interested persons will be heard at the public heating. SECTION 4. The Secretary is hereby directed to give notice of the public hearing and the filing of the Report by Publication in a newspaper of general circulation once a week for two (2) successive weeks and by first class mail to each person who owns a parcel which will be subject to such rates and charges as such names and addresses are shown in the last equalized roll or as known to the Secretary. SECTION 5. The Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED thi.~ 9th day of May, 1995. TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT Ronald H. Robere, President ATTEST: June Grcek, Secretary/City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CAY-rI:ORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) SS CITY OF TEMF, CULA ) I, , Secretary of the Temecuh Community Services District, I-r~Y DO CERTIFY that the foregoing Resoh~on __ was duly adopted at a regular meeting .of the Board of Directon of the Temecula Community Services District on the __ day of ,1995, by the following wll call vote: AYES: DIRECTORS: NOES: DIRECTORS: ABSENT: DIP, ECTORS: .Iune Greek, Secretary/City Clerk BXHIBITA PRO~X~T SUMMARY TEVIECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT On July 1, 1994, Municipal Financial Services was retained by the City of Temecula to prepare tile Annual Levy Rq)o~ for the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) for the Fiscal Year 1995/1996. Pursuant to the Community Services District Law, Division 3 of Title 6 of the Government Code of the State of California, commencing with Section 61000 et se~_., the TCSD has the power to levy and collect special rates and c~ in order W carry on its operations and to pwvide the services and facilities furnished by it. The levy and collection of the special rates and char~es is accomplished by the assignment of benefit to each parcel within a specific service level. A Service Level is a defined area that pwvides a specific service, operation and maintenance and/or proflare to only those parcels contained within that service level. The TCSD is currently composed of six (6) city-wide senrice levels. The descriptions of the service levels are as follows: Community Services. Paric~ and Recreation. Operations, mnintenance, and adminim-ation of the City community park systems, recreation facilities, services and programs. Service Level A - Arterial Street T,i~hts and Median Maintenance. Operations, maintenance, utility costs, and admini.m~tion of all arterial street fights, medians and Waffic signals. ,~rice I ~-vel B - Resid~ntiol Street ! ~fhts. Operations, malntcnancc, utility costs and administration of all rosidt~tial street lights. Service l,,*vel C - Perimeter I=ndscapinp nnd Siope Mmint~nnnce. Operations, maintenance, utility costs, improvements, and adminl.ql'ation for all perimeter landscaping and slope mninW, nance areas maintained by the TCSD. Service Level D - Rduse Collection. Ret3,elinf, rand Strmet SweQpinf. Operations, and admini.mation Of the x~se and n~ycling program, and street sweeping services for all single family residential homes. Service T~.vel R - Streets and Roads. Construction, installation, and maintenance of streets and wads. The Financial Analysis contained heroin conthins each Se~ice Level including with their totals for Fiscal Year 1995/1996 year to be as follows: Community Services/Pa~: Service Level A Service Level B Servic~ Level C Service Level D Service Level R TOTAL TCSD LEVY FY 9~/96 Service l ,~vel I ~ Budget $/SFR $2,611,856.00 $68.88 157,586.00 4.16 244,170.00 26.92 475,390.00 Variable 1,808,867.00 172.06 19,398.00 Variable $5,317,267.00 The Levy and Collection amounts for all non-exempt parcels within the TCSD for the Fiscal Year 1995/96 are as shown on the Assessment Roll on file with the City Clerk. RESOLUTION NO. CSD A RESOLUTION OF Tv~, BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ~ TEMIF~"'ULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ~ING ~ PROCEDURES FOR APPEALING ~ APPLICATION OR ~ATION OF RATES AND CHARGES AGAINST PROPERTY WITH IN ~ TEIVIICULA COIVIIVIU!m,WrY SERVICES DISTRICT WHKREA~, upon incorporation of the City of Temecula, C~lifomia (the "City") effective December 1, 1989, voters approved the formation of the Temecula Community Services District (the "TCSD"), which has the same area boundaries as the City and whose Board of Directors (the "Board*) consists of the members of the City Council of the City; and · WI4m:ulrAS, the TCSD has annually, adopted rates and charges for community services and parks, recreation facilities, services and programs, operation, maintenance, sendces and ~dmini.q~a~on of street lighting, slope m-'slntOnance, street lnain~, as well as the inclusion of rates and charges for recycling and refuse programs for those areas specifically benefitted thereby; and WHmxrAS, the TCSD presen~y permits property owners to appeal the rates and charges against their property on the basis that (1) the property owner disagrees with the grounds for subjecting the propony owner's land to a rate and charge, (2) an error has been made in the application or implementation of the rate or charge to the owner's propex~, or (3) such rate or charge would cause financial hardship on the property owner; and WHEREAS, the TCSD has pxepared and kept on file, procedures describing bow property owners may file appeals. NOW, Tm~EFORE, ~ BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ~ TINECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT DOES ~nmEWy RFf~LVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The TCSD Board determines that it is in the best interest of the TCSD and of the property owners within the TCSD, to provide an appeal procedure for certain matters pertaining to the application of rates or charges imposed by the TCSD upon real property within theDisUict. Section 2. The TCSD Board hereby adopts the "Appeals Proc~ures for the Tomecub Community Services District," in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A, and incorporated herein by thig reference as though set forth in full. Section 3. Resolution 93-03 of the TCSD, and all previous actions of the TCSD establhhhg appea procedures, are hereby repealed. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOFrED this __ day of , 1995. ATTEST: Ronald Roberts, President June S. Greek, Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALr!~ORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CrrYOFTEIVlK'IXA ) I, June S. Greek, Secretary of the Temecuh Community Services District, ]IRmRRy DO CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution CSD 95- was duly adopted at a regular meeting Of the Board of Dilcctors of Tcmecula Community Services ~ on the __ day of , 1995, by the following roll call vote: AYP_,S: DIRECTORS: NOBS: DIRBCTORS: ABSENT: DIRBCTORS: June S. Greek, Secretary m:xH,I1T A APPEALS PROCEDURES FOR Tmr~ ~ COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT (REVISED MAY 9, 199~) 1. Ai?peal of Classification or Correction of lr~rors Where a piol~:ty owner (including an individual, or business entity) subject to the rate or charge (1) questions the classification or application of any fiscal year's rate or charge to that property owner's property, or C2) clzlims that an error has be~ made with ~. to the application or implementation of the hue or clmrge to the pmpexty owner's propexty, that property owner shall utiliz~ the ~ procedur~ $e~ forth I~low as ~ exchsive procedure for ap~_~ling such jsmes and correc~g e~iors. (a) The property owner shall file a written appeal in the form established for the Temecula Community Services District (the "TCSD") Secrem~, stating in detail the reasons why the property owner seeks a review of the classification of the property owner' s property for the fiscal year or the facts and cimxmsmnc~ surrounding the error in the application or implementation of the rate or chnrge to the owner's property. The statement shall include the parcel number, proof of owne~hip, and any other information the property owner believes to be relevant w the appeal. At the same time that each property owner subject to the rates and charges is notified of the time, place and location of the public hearing rega/fiing the levy of rates and charges for a particular fiscal year, such property owners shall also be notified of the appeals deadline. Co) The last day to file an appeal shall be December 1 of the fiscal year in which the rate or charge is levied, or the next succeeding business day ff December 1 is a weekend day or holiday; pwvided, however, that if an appeal is filed after July 31, the property owner shall reimburse the City for any County Assessor's fees associated with amenaing the (c) The TCSD General Manager, or his assignee, shall review the written appeal. The General Manager or his designee my request, in writing, that the property owner provide any additional information needed to make a decision. The General Manager or his assignee shall make a determirmtion whether to grant such appeal within thirty (30) days of receipt of the completed statement, including all necessary information. The General Manager, or his assignee, shall give the property owner written notice of such determinntion of the appeal. (d) In the event the property owner disagrees with the General Manager's or his assignee's determination, the property owner shall have ten (10) days from the date of the General Manager's written determination to appeal that determination to the Temecula Community Services District Board of Directors (the "TCSD Board"). The property owner shall f'~e a written request for reconsideration with the TCSD Secretary, containing the information set out in subsection (a) and the reason for requesting reconsideration within the ten (10) day period. (e) Upon the receipt of a timely appeal, the TCSD Secretary shall phce the matter on the agenda for the next regularly scheduled TCSD meeting occurring not less than seven (7) days from recent of the appeal. The TCSD Board shall review the written statement and General Manager's or his designee's determination and the TCSD Board shall determine, based upon the materials before it, whether the appeal should'be granted. The TCSD Board's decision shnll be provided to the property owner in writing within 15 days of the TCSD Board' s determination. The decision of the TCSD Board shall be final. (f) In granting such an appeal based on the classification or application of any fiscal year's rate or charge to the owner's property, the General M~naSer, his designee and the TCSD Board sbsll consider: (i) whether the property in whole or in part is used for the purpose intended for that classification; (li) whether the classification adequately reflects the service received; (iii) whether the rate or charge levied on vacant property exceeds the rate or charge if the property where developed to its highest and best use; and (iv) whether unique or special circumstances of that property or land use regulations affecting it support a modification of the classification. In granting an appeal, the General Manager, his designee and the TCSD Board may reclassify the property, in whole or in pan, may grant a refund (without interest) of all or a portion of the rate or charge paid for any fiscal year and will determine for what period of time the relief granted shall be in effect. 2. Appeal for Hardship Where an individual property owner subject to payment of the rate or charge believes that payment of all or perdon of the rate or charge would create a hardship for that property owner during that fiscal year, the property owner may utilize the following procedures. A hardship appeal must be renewed annually unless otherwise specifically determined by the TCSD Board. (a) The property owner shall ~c a written statement with the TCSD Secretary stating in detafl the reason the property owner needs such relid. The statement shall include the parcel number, proof of ownership, and any relevant proof of hardship. The statement must be submitted W the TCSD Secretary by the deadline set by the TCSD. At the same time that each property owner subject W the rates and charges is notified of the time, phce and location of the public hearing regarding the levy of rates and charges to a particular fiscal year, such property owner shall also be no~fie~ of the deadline for filing hardship appeals. (b) The last day to file an appeal sbnll be December 1 of the fiscal year in which the rate or charge is levied, or the next succeeding business day if December 1 is a weekend day or holiday; provided, however, that if an appeal is filed after July 31, the property owner shall reimburse the City for any County Assessor's fees associated with amending the property tax statement. (c) The General Manager or his designee shall act on such statement in the same manner as set forth in Section l(b) and the Genenl Manager's or his designee's determination may be appealed as set forth in Section l(d) and (e). (d) In grating a hardship appeal, the General Manager, hi .~ designee and the TCSD Board shall consider whether payment of the rate or charge during that fisc~ year would adversely impact the property owner's ability to provide for the basic necessities of life. The General Manager, his designee and the TCSD Board shnll determine to grant such hardship- appeal on a case-by-case basis by providing for the defen-al of any rate or charge to a subsequent fiscal year. -MFS CITY OF TEMECULA PRELIMINARY ANNUAL LEVY REPORT TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT FISCAL YEAR 1995/1996 SUBMITTED APRIL 24,1995 MUNI FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. Corporate0fWce 28765 Single Oak Drive, Suite 200 Temecule, CA 92590 Tel: (909) 699.3990 Fax:. (909) 699-3460 Orange County Office 150 El Camino Real, Suite 120 Tustin, CA 92680 Tel: (714) 665-2220 Fax: (714) 665-2230 San Franc/aco Office 3727 Buchanan. Suite 202 San Francisco. CA 94123 Tel: (415) 441-3550 Fax:. (415) 441-1401 :MFS TABLE OF CONTENTS I. OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................... A. Introduction .................................................................................................1 B. Description of the District and Service~ ..................................................~2 C. Budget and Levy Summary ........................................................................3 II. DESCRIPTION OF THE DISTRICT ..........................................................................4 III. CHANGES TO THE DISTRICT ...............................................................................7 A. Modifications of the District Structure .......................................................7 B. Annexations .................................................................................................7 C. District Budget Changes .............................................................................8: IV. DISTRICT BUDGETS .............................................................................................9 V. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT. ...........................................................................11 APPENDIX A - LAND USE/EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNIT~ ................................14 APPENDIX B - 1995/96 COLLECTION ROLl_ ...........................................................15 All Inl~oduc'don The Temecula Community Services District (District) was formed in 1989 upon incorporation of the City of Temecula (City), to continue services previously provided by the County of Riverside (County). The boundan/of the District is coterminous with the City boundan/, and includes all taxable parcels within the City. The District collects special rates and charges in order to provide services and maintain the improvements within the District. The District was formed, and the rates and charges were set and established pursuant to Community Services District Law 61000, Section 61621, Title 6, Diw~ion 3 of the California Government Code (the Code). This Annual Levy Report (Report) describes the proposed rates and charges for Fiscal Year 1995/96 based on the historicel and estimated cost to provide services, and maintain improvements, that provide a benefit to properties within the DistdcL Each parcel charged receives direct benefit from the services provided to that parcel by the District. " The word "parcel,' for the purposes of this Report, refers to an individual property assigned its own Assessment Number by the Riverside County Assessors Office. The Riverside County Auditor/Controller uses Assessment Numbers and specific Fund Numbers, to identify on the tax roll, properties charged for special district benefits. A Public Headng will be held before the Distdct Board of Directors (Board). to allow the public an opportunity to hear and be heard regarding the District. Following the Public Headng, the Board may order modffications to the Report or confirm the Report as submitted. After approval of the Report, as submitted or as modffied, the Board thereby approves and confirms the Rates and Charges (Charges) for Fiscal Year 1995196, and shall order the levy and collection of Charges. In either case, the levy information will be submitted to the Riverside County Auditor/Controller to be included as Charges on the property tax roll for Fiscal Year 1995196. MFS Description of the District and Service The District provides certain services, and the maintenance of specific improvements within public rights-of-way and dedicated landscape easements throughout the City. The District consists of six (6) separate Service Levels, providing specffic services and benefit to parcels within certain areas throughout the City. Each parcel within the District is grouped within two (2) or more Service Levels based upon its location, and the quantity and type of services provided within that area. Each Service Level has diffedng costs depending upon the vadous services and improvements provided. All parcels identified within a Service Level, share in both the cost and the benefits of the services. The costs associated with the Services, are equitably spread between all benefiting parcels within that Service Level. Each parcel is charged its fair share of the costs of the services in propoffion to the estimated benefit received. The Service Levels are identified as follows: · Community Service, Parks and Recreation · Artedal Street Lighting and Medians · Residential Street Lighting · Local Landscaping and Slopes · Citywide Recycling and Refuse · Road Improvement and'Maintenance Services and improvements provided include the construction and maintenance of community parks, recreation programs, street lighting, median landscape maintenance, pedrneter landscape maintenance, slope protection, a recycling and refuse collection program, and road improvement construction and maintenance. gMFS C. Budget and Levy Summary Table I below, provides a comparison of levy information for the vadous Service Levels within the District, comparing Fiscal Year 1995/96 to the previous Fiscal Year. TABLE I SERVICE LEVELS 155,358 4.18 157,586 4.1l (0.02) 37,916.58 216.158 26.30 244,170, 26.92 0.02 9,075 14,717 I 40210 40.00 57,316 4L00 O.00 1,240 1,246 104,308 89.00 94,516 8100 O.00 1,062 1,062 113,796 116.00 1352.56 11L00 0.00 1,155 1,166 169,400 175.00 188,300 118.00 0.00 1,076 1,0/6 0 0.00 14,765 157.08 157.58 94.00 124 $0 SO.O0 $4,633 121.92 S121 .g2 38.00 58 Note: Due to rounding, the Total Levy Units (shown in this table) mumplied by the Cherge Per Unit me/be different from lhe Totai Levy Budget. Each Service Level provides different services, and is comprised of differing types of parcels. The 'Total Levy Units" and the resulting "Charge Per Levy Unit' (shown in Table I), reflects a method of apportionment that most fairly proportions the costs of the services to the benefit received by the parcels in that Service Level. For Community Services, Parks and Recreation, and Service Level A, levy units am calculated using a per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). The'Total Levy Units' for Service Levels B, C, and. D is based on a per parcel count. For Service Level R, leW units am based on a Parcel Development Unit (PDU), which is similar to a per parcel count, but makes a distinction between developed and undeveloped parcels. Rates and charges will be collected in Service Level R for the first time in Fiscal Year 1995/96. For a morn complete description of the methods used for calculating the 'Total Levy Units" used for each Service Level, please refer to (Section V), Method of Apportionment and Appendix A. MFS He DESCRIPTION OF THE DISTRICT Community Service, Parks, and RecreaUon provides a benefit to all parcels within the District and includes maintenance, service, and operations of all public parks in the District. Most park construction is provided either by developers as a condition of their residential projects or development impact fees. This Service Level also allows for the construction of the Community Recreation Center and its debt service. In addition, this Service Level provides funding for the vadous recreation programs throughout the City. The following is a list of some of the City's parks and recreation facilities: · Rancho Califomia Sports Park · Sam Hicks Monument Park · Veterans Park · Bahia Vista Park · Temecula Middle School Fields · Old Town Temecula Senior Center · Kent Hindergardt Memodal Park · Temecula ElementaW School Pool · Butterfield Stage Park · Temecula Community Recreation Center Paloma Del Sol Park Loma Unda Park Riverton Park John Magee Park Pala Community Park Voorburg Park Nakayama Park Nicolas Road Park Calle Aragon Park Service Level A, Arterial Street !.ighUng and Medians provides a benefit to all parcels within the District and City through the servicing, operation, and maintenance of street lighting and landscaped medians along artedal streets. Service Level B, Residential Street Lighting provide a benefit to all single family residential and vacant parcels within those tram requiring servicing, operation, and maintenance of local street lighting. *MFS Service Level C, Perimeter Landscaping and Slopes provides the servicing, operation, and maintenance of perimeter landscaped areas and slopes within the public dght of way and dedicated easements within certain tram. The level of maintenance required within these tram vades depending on operating costs and therafom, four (4) rate levels have been established. Table II shows a listing of the tram in each of the four (4) rate levels within Service Level C (Local Landscaping and Slopes.) TABLE II Service Level C Tracts 28861.,02 vW~,~r.a.~.~Cg!i~ 20130-00 2271501 W. LAGEMO~ 21672-01 ~ 20130-04 22718-02 2187300 22593..02 21340-~ 22915.-02 2187401 THE vee'YAm~ 2087g-(X} 2134003 22915-03 2167402 21340-05 22916-01 21875.00 2134008 2291e-02 21875-01 I 2134007 2187502 v__-~__-,'_~:.a, _e~__efmy 21581-00 21875.03 21875-08 Service Level D, Citywide Recycling and Street Sweeping provides for the operation and administration of the refuse and recycling program and street sweeping services for all single family residential homes within the District. Service Level R, Roads provides funding for construction, improvement, service and maintenance of public streets and roads throughout the City. The services provided may include, but are not limited to: renovation or restoration due to damage; flood and drainage control; repairs and re-grading; and upgrades of the existing areas as required for unpaved roads. Service Level R was added to the Distdct in Fiscal Year 1993194. All parcels identified within Service Level R, share in both the cost and the beneffus of the services provided. The costs associated with the services, are equitably spread between all benefiting parcels within vadous areas (rate levels) of the Service Level. Each parcel is charged its fair share of the costs of the services in proportion to the estimated benefit received. In Fiscal Year 1995/96, two (2) areas of the City and the parcels in those areas have been added to Service Level R. The level of maintenance required within these two (2) areas vades due to operating costs and therefore, separate rate levels have been established. Only the parcels within each of the two (2) boundary areas will be charged for the costs associated with servicing and maintaining the roads and streets in the area. Rate Level R-1 The parcels within this rate level consists of one hundred twenty- four (124) parcels that have direct access to roads or streets that are serviced and maintained through the District. This rate level provides funding for servicing and maintenance of: Nicolas Road; Greenwood Lane; I.iefer Road; Gatiin Road; Pala Vista; Calle Girasol; Aussie Road; Calle Chapos; Walcott Road; and Tommy Lane. A total of 3.196 miles of roads are serviced and maintained in this area. Rate Level R-2 The parcels within this rate level consists of fifty-nine (59) parcels that have direct access to roads or streets that are serviced and maintained through the District. This rate level provides funding for servicing and maintenance of: Ormsby Road; Santiago Road; Lolita Road; and John Wamer Road. A total of 1.003 miles of roads are serviced and maintained in this area. 6 ~ gMFS CHANGES TO THE DISTRICT For Fiscal Year 1995196, changes within the District that affect the levy are outlined below. Modifications of the District Structure Modifications to the District structure, if any, could include, but are not limited to: changes in the types of services provided; addition of new services or Service Levels; restructudng of the current Service Levels; or revisions in the method of apportionment. No changes are anticipated to the Distdct structure for this Fiscal Year. Two (2) project areas (rate levels) are being added to Service Level R for Fiscal Year 1995/96. The new rate levels within Service Level R will provide funding for the servicing and maintenance of unpaved roads. Only. the parcels within each of the two (2) boundary areas will be charged for the costs associated with servicing and maintaining the roads and streets in the area. Annexations Annexations to Service Level C (Local Landscaping and Slopes), are the parcels within: · Rate level #1 -Tract 22762-00 (Rancho Highlands). · Rata level fr2 - Tract 22148-00 (Moralson Homes). · Rate level # 3 - Tracts 2291.6-00, 22916-01 and 22916-02 (Vintage Hills) · Rate level # 4 - Tracts 21675-00 (Village Grove); Tract 25004-01 (Barclay Estates). Annexations to Service Level B (Residential Street Lighting), are the parcels within Tracts: 22762-00 23125-01 24133-00 22916-03 23483-00 24135-00 23100-03 24131-01 24135-02 23101-02 24131-02 Additionally, 1,805 parcels have been added to Service Level D for the 1995196 Fiscal Year. Annexations to Service Level R (Roads) includes: · One hundred twenty-four (124) parcels to rate level #1 · Fifty-nine (59) parcels to rate level #2 No other annexations are planned to any of the other Service Levels or to the District for Fiscal Year 1995/96. District Budget Change The Community Services, Parks and Recreation Service Level rates have increased due to the operations and maintenance costs of the Temecula Community Recreation Center, and the Old Town Ternecula Senior Center, as well as expansion and improvements to several neighborhood and community parks. Operations and energy costs for Service Levels A (Arterial Street Lights) has increased over the previous year. HoWever, the increased cost has been off- set by an increase in the EDU count for the Service Level. In Service Level B (Residential Street Lighting), the number of parcels receiving benefit has increased, but due to increased energy costs, there will be a small increase to the rate per parcel. Service Level D (Recycling and Refuse), has increased due to an increase in the Consumer Pdce Index (CPI). 8 ~ DISTRICT BUDGETS Table III on the next two (2) pages shows the District budget for Fiscal Year TABLE III 1995/96 DISTRICT BUDGET Temecula Community Services District 1995196. Operating Budget Department Summan/for the Year Ending June 30, 1996 Ammmt CommmlW LmIIA lawliB LevdC ~ LemiD , I..mllR- TelEl/- Smmm ~ WeBm 5100 S?t518 15,781 15,515 53,~r3 17,310 0 ei, lo5 I)ekned Comeenmlim 5101 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PERS i 5102 8~.066 2.513 2,78~ 5,828 0 0 SilmtJ4av~i~q,,._~t 5103 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ FICA 5104 8285 242 288 i 0 0 5,6&4 A~I Aimmine ........ 5103 2400 0 0 0 0 0 2.400 U~ . ~_ ~,, .,. _.~t Training Tm sloe 5,082 129 287' 445 0 0 5,B43 0iBlilN imamms Sl10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pat-The (Pmie~ 511e 2m,~4 0 0 15,830 0 0 305,M4 / (Promrural 8e/vimB) 81,088,4~0 ~22,455 127.8e6 1e0,888 817.310 10 $1.244.T/6 Ternram knme (C4kml 5208 4,500 0 0 0 0 0 4,500 Ilmm,&MmtoFBiillm 5212 123,500 0 0 4/,888 0 0 177,388 Rmmr&Mmt.43EmEclmmet 5211 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 laemlmmmBulNMe 5218 0 SO0 0 0 0 0 500 Ollm 84411m 5220 15,000 0 0 0 0 0 15,000 7,'--~,v 5222 33,000 0 0 0 0 0 33,0(30 Ptlllmmm 522B ~00 0 0 0 0 0 500 PeeegeenclPemeeng S230 9.S00 0 0 0 0 0 eem-Fealllee 5234 3J22 0 0 0 0 0 3,522 Nel-~ 5238 15,~0 0 0 0 0 0 15,000 Eealaeee Leme 523e 2.000 0 0 0 0 0 2.000 Ullill 5~40 2/7,15) 5,000 0 88.048 O O 3/1.103 teeltmeTeamem 5242 5,000 ~00 0 0 0 0 Uedlmem S243 rul00 0 0 0 0 0 Signe 5244 10.000 0 0 0 0 0 Leee 8emee 52,m 20.0110 0 0 0 0 0 20.000 OleroeaemSev,ze 5250 56.200 0 0 20.000 0 0 /5.200 Aemeial 52~4 4.(x30 0 0 0 5,000 0 let/NIMime 5288 e.0130 0 0 0 0 0 Cemeemee 5258 1./00 0 0 0 0 0 lemlemimelMeemF 510 2.000 0 0 0 0 0 2.10 SlleTr '...~- "~ 5281 5,0QO 0 0 0 0 0 lleeee 5282 3.000 0 0 0 0 0 Fuel i / ~283 7.000 1,000 0 0 0 o 5,oQo Cmmil Dlemeiemy ~E/ S,O00 0 0 0 0 0 Blmmtnm S2Ba 500 0 0 0 0 0 ~1) Sueemel {5200'1) 1843.2/2 S10.000 10 $1S3.911 IS.0CO 10 1812.113 gMFS TABLE III 1995/96 DISTRICT BUDGET Temecula Community Services District Operating Budget Department Summary for the Year Ending June 30, 1996 """' I':1 :1:i :1 :1:1' ~ ~ ~301194. 1N,4~8 WIll HIMling ~315 1.838. 1.838.44/ Seeel.~ s~e o ~ ~,,xem-' o ~ u ~ e ~ ~,~ 0 0 0 0 0 / I t~1~ 0 '0 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~t~ 0 0 0 0 0 ~; ~ ~ 17.~ 0 0 0 0 0 17.G Fi I ~ 0 0 0 0 0 e ~ ~ ~G 0 o o o o /~Vm~ ~-.~ ~S 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~a ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ (~e) ~ St~ ~ ~ Sl .~ ~ ~t4 OemrExpedluae SI)O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Oeeltf~ Tmnllem Out 8901 51]~41S 0 0 0 0 0 902.415 SUBTOTAL (Olmr F, xlmedilum8) 9802.41S Oeae F~ewemgs ~01 1.000 0 0 0 0 0 1.000 O~ke Etl/eltent 5802 1.000 0 0 0 0 0 1 eme 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Equemel 9810 4.500 0 0 0 0 0 4.i30 Cle -Peiec~ S804 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SUBTOTN. (Ce,~ Oemy) Telml ~ ~ ~3.Cl2,1.544 S174.2~ 1287,89~ l.~4,148 $1.88~/S/ Ble!NBTUR!I RESERVEFORCONTliGENCY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL. DISTRICT C06'TS 3.02,4,544 174.255 2s'/.ee~ 554.148 1.88o./5/ lt3ee TOT~LI)IPIIIITtMll 3,024,~4 174.25~ 2B/.m M,4,7~ 1.IO./'S7 ~ i SOtJRCE~ 314.404 ~ 3.000 2~IIX) 22.310 0 FUNO BALANCE m~84 10.378 20./2S 51.11 21JIB O ZI0.32S BN.jUiCE TO LEVY 2.611.81~ 1S/.18 244.1/0 4/S.310 1.801.1/ 11.1 S.311.3r/ 113TAL R!VlBIUee 3.024.S44 174.2~ 28/.816 S~4.741 1.110./S7 lt311 S. B01.BIT MFS V. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT As in past years, the cost to provide services within the District will be fairly distributed among each assessable property based upon the estimated beneft received by each property. The benefit formula used is based upon the Service Level, the land use and size of a property. For Service Level Community Services, Parks, and Recreation, and Service Level A: Artedal Street LighUng and Medians, each property is assigned an Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU) factor that reflects the property's land use and degree of benefit. For Service Levels. (B-Residential Street Lighting; C-Local Landscaping and Slopes; and D- Recycling and Refuse), the rates and charges am based on a per parcel basis. In Service Level R (Roads) each property is assigned a Parcel Development Unit (PDU) factor that reflects both parcel count and whether the parcel is developed. The following is the formula used to calculate each property's District charges by EDU. Please refer to Appendix A for a complete listing of land use codes and their associated EDU. Service Levels: Community Services, Parks and Recreation; A - Arterial Street Lighting and Medians: Parcel EDU X Acres or Units X Charge per EDU = Parcel Charge The following is the formula used to calculate each pmperty's District charges by the per parcel method. Service Levels: B - Residential Street Lighting; C - Local Landscaping and Slopes; and D - Citywide Recycling and Refuse: Total Balance to Levy / Total Parcels in Service Level = Parcel Charge The Rate Per Levy Unit for Service Level R is based on a Parcel Development Unit (PDU), which is similar to a per parcel charge, but makes a distinction between developed and undeveloped parcels. Service Levels: B - Roads Parcel Development Units = 1.0 for Developed parcel and 0.5 for undeveloped parcels Total Balance to Levy ! Total Parcel PDU in rate Level = Parcel Charge g MFS Table IV shown on the next two pages, reflects the levy calculations for vadous property types for each Service Level. TABLE N PARCEL CHARGE CALCULATIONS FOR COMMUNITY SERVICES, PARKS, AND RECREATION Single Family Residential 1.00 $68.88 $68.88 Per Unit Multi Family ResidenlMI 0.75 68.88 51.66 Per Unit Agricultural 0.50 68.88 34.44 Per Acre Single Family Vacant 2.00 68.88 137.76 Per Acre Non-Residential Vacant 4.00 68.88 275.52 Per Acre Non-Residential Improved 6.00 508.88 $413.28 Per Acre PARCEL CHARGE CALCULATIONS FOR SERVICE LEVEL A Single Family ResidentiN 1.00 $4.16 $4.16 Per Unit Multi Family Residential 0.75 4.16 3.12 Per Unit Agricultural 0.50 4.16 2.08 Per Ace Single Family Vacant 2.00 4.16 8.32 Per Acre Non-ResidentiBi Vacant 4.00 4.16 16.64 Per Acre Non-Relentiai Improved 6.00 $4.16 $24.96 Per Acre PARCEL CHARGE CALCULATIONS FOR SERVICE LEVEL B Single Family ResidE, stial Single Family Vacant -' ': Unit-".X'perPm'cel~="~ C~: 1,00 $26.92 $26,92 Per Pwael 1.00 $26,92 $26,92 Per Parcel TABLE IV PARCEL CHARGE CALCULATIONS FOR SERVICE LEVEL C Property Type Single Family Residential Rate C-1 Single Family Residential Rate C-2 Single Family Residential Rate C-3 single Frohey e..e~enu.~ Rre C4 Parcel Charge= Unit X perPercelr-e 1.00 $46.00 1.00 89.00 1.00 116.00 I , .O0 I S, 75.00 I Citmfge- ' ~. Multlplle~..- $48.00 Per Parcel 89.00 Per Parcel 116.00 Per Pmrcei $ 7s.ool .erpa. I PARCEL CHARGE CALCULATIONS FOR SERVICE LEVEL D Single Family Residential ' 1.00 X pef-~;- = .. 'Charge -;Multiplier, · $172.06 $172.06 Per Parcel PARCEL CHARGE CALCULATIONS FOR SERVICE LEVEL R Single Flmily Relklent~ Rite R-1 Single Family Vacant Rate R-1 Single Family Re~derfdal Rate R-2 Single Family Vacant R.me....R-2 1.00 $157.08 I 0.50 157.08 I ~ .oo I ,=~ .- I i o.,o I s,2, .,~ I $157.08 Perlaln~ I 78.54 Per Parc~ 121.92 I Per Parcel MFS Appendix A - LAND USE/EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNITS :.,.~:" ~-:'" Property. Type- Single Family Residential Multi Family Residential Agricultural Single Family Vacant Non-Residential Vacant Non-Residential Improved 1995196. Equi~'alent: '- ........ Dwelling:Units .MUltipliec -' 1.00 Units 0.75 Units 0.50 Acres 2.00 Acres 4.00 Acres 6.00 Acres .MFS Appendix B - 1995/96 COLLECTION ROLL Parcel identification, for each lot or parcel within the District, shall be the parcel as shown on the County Assessor"s map for the year in which this report is prepared. Non-assessable lots or parcels include govemment owned land. public utility owned property, and land principally encumbered with public rights-of-way. A listing of parcels within this District, along with the charges, has been submitted to the City Clerk and, by reference. is made part of this report. ITEM 3 APPROV CITY ATTORNERPYR~~ FINANCE OFFIC CITY MANAGE ,. \ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: Board of Directors FROM: Ronald E. Bradley, General Manager DATE: May 9, 1995 SUBJECT: Naming of Park and Recreation Facilities PREPARED BY: ~ 4~ Beryl Yasinosky, Management Assistant RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors: Consider, and if desired, approve the names for two (2) quarter-acre park sites, two (2) three- acre neighborhood park sites, and a twenty (20) acre community park site. BACKGROUND: Pursuant to City policy, it is the responsibility of the Community Services Commission to forward recommendations concerning the naming of City park and recreation facilities to the Board of Directors for · final decision. On April 10, 1995, the Community Services Commission recommended that the following names are considered by the Board of Directors for several park facilities that will be completed in the near future. The Commission recommends that in consideration of Temecula's initial Sister City relationships, the names "Voorburg Park" and 'Nakayama Park" be considered for the two (2) quarter-acre park sites on Nicolas Road. One of the parks is nearing completion, and it is anticipated that the other park will begin construction within the next few months. The name "Nicolas Road Park" is recommended for the three (3) acre neighborhood perk currently under construction at the northwest corner of Nicolas Road and North General Kearny Road. The Commission also recommends that the name "Butterfield Stage Park" be considered for the three (3) acre neighborhood park currently under construction on De Portola Road, east of Butterfield Stage Road. While the aformentioned parks are being constructed by the developers, · future twenty (20) acre community park will be designed and constructed by the City of Temecula. Located on the south side of Margarita Road, the site is just west of the Temecula Elementary School. The Commission recommends that this facility is named "Margarita Community Park". According to the existing naming policy, the Board of Directors may approve the park names, as recommended by the Community Services Commission, or may consider any other names desired. FISCAL IMPACT: ATTACHMENTS: None. 1. 2. 3. Location Maps. Community Services Commission Staff Report dated 4/10/95. Resolution No. CSD 92-08: Naming Parks and Recreation Facilities. r:.~ymbo~r.~msqk.md N2s~5 U~'OU U3.1, ~ I STR£F-'~ TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT Community Services Commission Shawn D. Nelson, Director of Community Services April 10, 1995 Naming of Park and Recreation Facilities PREPARED BY: {b~ Beryl Yasinosky, Management Assistant RECOMMENDATION: That the Community Services Commission: Approve names to be recommended to the Board of Directors for two (2), quarter-acre park sites, two (2), three-acre neighborhood park sites, and a twenty (20) acre community park site. BACKGROUND: Pursuant to City policy, it is the responsibility of the Community Services Commission to forward recommendations to the Board of Directors concerning the naming of each park and recreation facility operated by the City of Temecula. Due to several facilities that will be completed in the near future, it is recommended to address the official names of these park sites so proper signage can be approved as part of the development process and familiarity with the parks can be established within the community. The quarter-acre park sites are located on the north side of Nicolas Road, just south of the Santa Gertrudis Creek. One park site is within Van Daele's Tract No. 22627-0 and the other is within Lyon's Communities' Tract No. 22627-1. Staff has received recommendations that the following names be considered in honor of Temecula's initial Sister City relationships: 1. Voorburg Park 2. Nakayama Park One of the three (3) acre park sites is located on the northwest corner of Nicolas Road and North General Kearny Road· The park is being constructed by Coscan-Davidson pursuant to the conditions for Tract No. 27827. The following names have been recommended: 2. 3. 4. Roripaugh Park Nicolas Road Park Summerfield park Santa Gertrudis Creek Park 04.1095 r.~ymlmobk'~mmapk. s The remaining three (3) acre park site is located on the north side of De Portola Road, east of' Butterfield Stage Road. The park is being constructed by Kaufman & Broad pursuant to the conditions of approval for Tract No. 23125. The following names have been recommended: 1. Butterfield Stage Park 2. Stagecoach Park 3. De Portola Park 4. Woodland Park 5. Cottonwood Park 6. Elderberry Park 7. Washana Park The twenty (20) acre community park site is owned by the City. Located on the south side of Margarita Road, the future park is just west of Temecula Elementary School. The following names have been recommended: 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Margarita Community Park Arrowhead Park Town Center Park Louis Wolf Park Temeku Park Misty Valley Park The Community Services Commission may consider the above names or any other names desired for these park sites. Also attached for your review is an additional list of recommendations from the community regarding possible names for City parks. FISCAL IMPACT: ATTACHMENTS: None, List of Additional Park Names. Resolution No. CSD 92-08: Naming Parks and Recreation Facilities. LIST OF NAME RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FUTURE CITY OF TEMECULA PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES 1. Palomino Park 12. 2. Cutting Horse Park 13. 3. Wild Horse Park 14. 4. Bronco Park 15. 5. Cattle Drive Park 16. 6. Vaqueros Park 17. 7. Wagon Wheel Park 18. 8. Fort Temecuia Park 19. 9. Old West Park 20. 10. Rodeo Ranch Park 21. 11. Indian Park 22. Eagle Park Eagle Ranch Park Vineyard Park Granite Park Wolfe Valley Park Bear Mountain Park Rainbow Canyon Park Ponderosa Park Recreation Park Earle Stanley Gardner Park Vail Ranch Park c~mo~k~ac RESOLUTION NO. CSD 92-08 A RESOLLrHON OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ~ TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRIC~ ADOPTING A POLICY FOR NAMING PARKS AND RECREATION FACILITIES WHEREAS, on April:23, 1991, the Board of Directors (the "Board") adopwxl apolicy for naming parks and recreation facilities; and Wltt;REAS, the Community Services District and the Parks and Recreation Commission requests that the aforementioned policy be adopted by resolution; NOW, Tl:n~~, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA. COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT DOES HEREBY, RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOIJ~)WS: Section 1. That the policy for naming parks and recreation facilities as set forth on Exhibit "A' is adopted establishing a uniform policy and procedure that identifies criteria for the naming of parks and recreation facilities. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOFrED this 8th day of September, 1992. Ronald J. Parks, President ATTEST: STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEM~CULA ) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, Fr~I:RY DO CERTIFY that the foregoing Eesolution No. CSD 92-08 was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 8th day of September 1992 by the following roll call vote. AYES: 5 DIRECrOP, S: Birdsall, Moore, Lindemans, Mu~oz Parks, NOES: 0 DIRECTORS: None ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None un '~~.~~-~ ~) e S. Greek, Zlerk EXhibit "A" TEEdECULA CONSVIUNITY SERVICES DISTR/CT Naming 'Parks and Recreation Facilities PURPOSE To establish a uniform policy and procedure criteria for the naming of parks and recreation that idanti~ies facilities. POLICY The Park and Recreation Commission will be responsible for the selection of names for parks and recreation facilities- Once a name is selected, it will be forwarded to the Board of Directors for ratification- Staff will be responsible for encouraging citizens and community organizations to suggest possible names that will then be forwarded to the Commission for consideration- At a minimum, each park and community building will be designated a name. Naming of specific areas within a park (garden, swimming pool, lake,. ballfield, etc.) is acceptable but should be kept to a minimum to avoid confusion. No park shall-be given a name which might be perceived as controversial by the community- All names selected shall be acceptable and meaningful tO a majority of the neighborhood/community where the park or recreation facility is located. Priority in naming sites shall be given to geographical locations, historic significance or geologic features. No park shall'be named for a person, except where an individual has made a si~ificant financial contribution toward the acquisition and/or development of the perk or facility or has been an outstanding long-time community leader who ~as suppor%ed open space and recreational activities- All park and recreation facilities will be designated a formal name within six months of acquisition or construction- All parks shall have an entrance sign. Buildings will have an entrance sign and a plaque inside the facility for m~me identification- The. name of a park or recreation facility may be changed'onlY after a hearing is held by the Commission to receive community input and direction. No name shall be changed unless there is significant justification and suppor~ by the community- RESPONSIBI]' ITY Depar'cment Parks and Recreation Commission Department ACTION Acquires a new park or recreation facility, Solicits possible names from community. Forwards suggested names to the Parks and Recreation Commission for consideration. Receives any additional community input. Selects a name for recreation facility, ForWards name to ratification- Installs the appropriate plaque, the new park or City Council for naming sign or REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ITEM 1 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY TUESDAY, APRIL 11, 1995 A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency was called to order at 9:08 PM at the Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. Chairperson Ronald J. Parks presiding. PRESENT: 5 AGENCY MEMBERS: Lindemans, Mu~oz, Roberts, Stone, Parks ABSENT: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None Also present were City Manager Ronald E. Bradley, General Counsel Peter Thorson and City Clerk June S. Greek PUBLIC COMMENT None given. RDA CONSENT CALENDAR I Minutes 1.1 Approve the minutes of February 28, 1995. 1.2 Approve the minutes of March 14, 1995. It was moved by Agency Member Stone, seconded by Agency Member Roberts to approve Consent Calendar Item No. 1 with a correction on 1.2, showing Agency Member Roberts absent. The motion was unanimously carried. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'$ REPORT None given. AGENCY MEMBER'$ REPORTS None given. r:~ninutes.rda\041195 1 5/1/95 ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Agency Member Stone, seconded by Agency Member Roberts to adjourn at 9:09 PM to a Joint City Council, RDA, Planning Commission Meeting, Rancho California Water District Board Room, 42135 Winchester Road, Temecula, CA. The motion was unanimously carried. Next Regular Meeting: April 25, 1995, 8:00 PM, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. Ronald J. Parks, Chairperson ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk/Agency Secretary r:\minutes.rda~041195 2 511/95 MINUTES OF A JOINT MEETING OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL/TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND THE TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION HELD APRIL 19, 1995 A joint meeting of the Temecula City Council, Redevelopment Agency and the Temecula Planning Commission was called to order in the Board Room of the Rancho California Water District at 7:04 PM, Mayor Jeffrey E. Stone presiding. PRESENT 4 ABSENT: 1 PRESENT: 4 ABSENT: I COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: Mufioz, Parks, Roberrs, Stone Lindemans Fahey, Ford, Slavin, Webster Blair Also present were City Manager Ronald E. Bradley, City Attorney Peter Thorsen, Planning Director Gary Thornhill and City Clerk June S. Greek. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The audience was led in the Pledge of Allegiance by Commission Chairman Steve Ford. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments offered. COUNCIL/COMMISSION REPORTS _ Councilmember Parks requested the members of the audience, commission and council observe a moment of silent prayer for the victims of the Oklahoma City bombing tragedy. Councilmember Roberrs reported briefly on the on-going efforts to place traffic directors at the Winchester/Jefferson intersection and Winchester overpass, COUNCIL CONSENT CALENDAR Substitute-Public Improvement Aoreement in Parcel Moo No. 71383 It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Roberts to approve the following staff recommendations: R:~4inutes%O41995 -1 - April 19, 1995 City Council Minute 1.1 Approve the substitute agreement for completion of street improvements in Parcel Map No. 21383. 1.2 Authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement and the City Clerk to so attest and have recorded. 1.3 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Surety. The motion was unanimously carried with Mayor Pro Tam Lindemans absent. CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY/PLANNING COMMISSION BUSINESS Status and Information Report on the Prooosed Old Town Redevelooment Project and Performina Arts District The joint meeting of the Council, Agency and Commission was called to order by Agency Chairperson Ronald J. Parks. Agency Member Stone announced he would step down due to a potential conflict of interest. Planning Director Gary Thornhill introduced the staff report and outlined the matters to be covered during the workshop. Assistant Planner Matthew Fagin presented the Westside Specific Plan and the Master Conditional Use Permit for the Old Town Entertainment Project. Councilmember Mufioz questioned if the Master Conditional Use Permit is limited to the number of uses listed in the staff report. Planner Fagin responded that any additional uses would require anoth~r~onditional Use Permit. Councilmember Mui~oz stated he objects to any high density residential in Area D of the Westside Specific Ran. Commissioner Webster asked if the architectural style proposed for the residential in Planning Area D will be compatible with that of the Hotel and Neighborhood Commercial Center. Planning Director Thornhill stated the architectural style would be required to be compatible at the time plans are submitted. Principal Engineer Ray Casey addressed the traffic conditions projected by the City's traffic consultant. He advised that all intersections will be at equal or better levels of service, at build-out, compared to currently existing conditions. He also stated that one-half of the intersections show an improvement at build-out over the present level of service. Mr. Casey also outlined the locations of the proposed parking facilities. Commissioner Slavin asked if the use of parking structures versus parking lots had been explored. Engineer Casey responded that staff analysis showed this is not an economically viable solution R:%Minutes%041995 -2- 05/02/95 City Coun~q Minute April 19. 1995 Councilmember Roberrs asked when the realignment of Front Street and the possible realignment of Pujol Street would be addressed with the City Council. Mr, Casey stated this could be done during the preliminary design phase, Councilmember Perks questioned the timing of the Murrieta Creek Channel improvements. Mr. Casey advised that the project does not have a responsibility to improve the creek to its ultimate solution. Councilmember Parks also questioned when the loop ramps at the I-15 and Highway 79 South intersection will be completed. Mr. Casey responded that this is projected to be completed by the year 2010. Councilmember Muf~oz asked if the land owners in the proposed Benefit Assessment. District have been polled to determine their willingness to participate in the Western Bypass Parkway Assessment District. City Manager Bradley stated he was unable to respond regarding all of the possible owners. Associate Planner David Hogan presented the General Plan and Specific Plan Consistency and the Environmental Impact Report. Tom Dodson, the consultant who prepared the Environmental Impact Report, pointed out the comparable acreage between the General Plan and the Westside Specific Plan. Pat Fay, 31235 Calle Felicidad, spoke in favor of local contractors having the opportunity to be trained in how to bid on sub-contracts with Fluor Daniel. He recommended the City hold classes to show local contractors how to submit pre-bid qualifications, etc, Commissioner Slavin clarified that the City could act as a facilitator but would not fund such a training program. Commissioner Fahey discussed the need for the Planning Commission to be aware of the Council/Agency members goals and how they would like to have the Commission proceed with this project. Counciimember Mur~oz said he would like the commission to look at Planning Area D of the Westside Specific Plan relative to the density designation. He also indicated he would like them to address his concern on the impact high density residential will have on the escarpment. He further stated he wants to insure the limits on the permitted uses in the Master Conditional Use Permit are established as the upper limits allowed for Old Town. Lastly, he said he feels the Highway 79 South and I-15 circulation and impacts of the improvements should be looked at as they will affect the southerly end of the City end neighboring communities. Commissioner Slavin expressed concerns with the parking needs of the project and stated she would like to see further consideration of the use of parking structures. Chairman Ford asked to have a breakdown of the dollars available to spend for parking R:~Vlinutee%041995 -3- 06/02/9S Auffi 19. 1995 City Council Minmes structures at the present time and those that would be available to spend at 8 later date. Councilmember Robarts said he feels Planning Area D should be carefully studied as to the density issue and asked staff to keep the Council and Commission updated regarding possible realignments of Front and Pujol Streets. He also expressed concern that the signal and ramp widening at I-15 and Highway 79-South be completed prior to opening of the project. : Councilmember Parks asked that the Agency and the Planning Commission have an open mind with regard to Area D and allow review of suggested designs before ruling out possible developments solely on the basis of density. He also suggested the development of Area D may result in tradeoffs which could expedite construction of: the Bridge over Murrieta Creek. Member Parks also shared in the concerns regarding timing of the I-15/Highway 79-South intersection signalization and ramp widening and agreed that some structural paring should be considered for the Old Town project. Commissioner Webster expressed concern that the area designated Tourist Retail may compete with the existing businesses located in Old Town. He further expressed a desire to assure the architectural styles of the Wild West Arena and the Hotel Complex are aesthetically compatible with the escarpment. Commissioner Fahey asked that the Council/Agency let the Planning Commission know how they should be communicating with the Council/Agency during the development of the project. Commissioner Slavin stated she is concerned that the publicized opening date not drive the project and stressed that attention to quality should be the driving force. Planning Director Thornhill;in response to a question from Counciimember Mu~ioz, stated the Master Conditional Use Permit is only for the project as proposed. He said staff is working on an ordinance that will restrict future entertainment facilities in the Old Town area. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Chairman Ford, seconded by Commissioner Slavin to adjourn to the next regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning Commission to be held May 1, 1995 at the Rancho California Water District Board Room. The motion was unanimously carried. It was moved by Councilmember Roberts, seconded by Councilmember MuRoz to adjourn to the meeting of April 25, 1995 to be held at the Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. R:~Vinutes~,O41995 05/02/95 Ciw Council Minute Aoril 19, 1995 CITY MANAGER REPORTS No report given. CITY ATTORNEY REPORTS No report given. ATTEST: Ronald J. Parks, Chairman Temecula Redevelopment Agency June S. Greek, CMC City Clerk/Agency Secretary R:~linutes%041995 05/O2/95 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY HELD APRIL 25, 1995 A regular meeting of the Temecula Redevelopment Agency was called to order at 8:24 PM at the Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. PRESENT: 5 AGENCY MEMBERS: Lindemans, Mu~oz, Roberrs, Stone, Parks ABSENT: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None Also present were Executive Director Ronald E. Bradley, General Counsel Peter Thorson and Deputy City Clerk Susan W. Jones. PUBLIC COMMENT: None given. CONSENT CALENDAR It was moved by Agency Member Stone, seconded by Agency Member Lindemans to approve Consent Calendar Item 1. The motion was unanimously carried. I Minutes 1.1 Approve the minutes of March 28, 1995. AGENCY BUSINESS 2 Selection of Fluor Daniel for Construction Manaoement Services Agency Member Stone stepped down from the dais due to a conflict of interest. Executive Director Ron Bradley presented the staff report. Agency Member Lindemans questioned item number 2 in the report regarding the project approach consisting of a total infrastructure cost of $11,641,615,which includes the Western Bypass for $4,797,000; will this money come from the assessment district? Executive Director Bradley confirmed it will come from the assessment district. Minutee.rde%042595 -1 - 4/25/95 Agency Member Parks discussed the estimated funding required and the building facade program in the amount of $200,000; there is concern with giving Fluor Daniel, Inc. an exclusive for the facade improvements, as some of the individual owners may want to do their own facades; he questionned if this is possible with this agreement. Executive Director Bradley explained that it is, as the facade improvement is a very small part of the overall public improvements, and the City wanted to be sure that consistency is maintained between all of the documents released regarding the Old Town Entertainment Project and the public improvements. Agency Member Parks stated since many times the sewer and water improvements are handled by the utility companies end not by the City; there is no need to pay a construction management fee for something handled by another agency. Executive Director Bradley explained that if the City is not paying for the construction through a contract, they will not be managing it. Tom Shimmin of Fluor Daniel, Inc. stated that they are set-up to serve purely as an extension of City staff; they will represent the City and will be doing just what they are directed to do; they bring in the experts and people to manage the contracts, and the fees are based accordingly on the percentage that they do. Executive Director Bradley stated that at the time the City gets into negotiations, it will determine that amount, which will come back to Council for final approval. He explained a suggestion was made by a citizen that the City provide training to local subcontractors to work with Fluor Daniel; this concept has been discussed with Mr. Shimmin and with the Economic Development Corporation, and both agreed that this program would be viable, valuable and have agreed to participate. Frank Dizovia, also representing Fluor Daniel, Inc., explained that it is very customary for Fluor Daniel to hold job fairs on public works projects to introduce the community and the contractors to the project, how it is going to be broken down, what type of contractors they are looking for and how the bids are going to be assembled. It was moved by Agency Member Lindemans, seconded by Agency Member Roberts to approve staff recommendation as follows: 2.1 Authorize the City Manager to initiate negotiations with Fluor Daniel, Inc. for construction management services in connection with the construction of public improvements to serve the Old Town Entertainment Project. IVinutee.rda~42595 -2- 4125/95 The motion was carried by the following vote: 3 AYES: 4 AGENCY MEMBERS: Lindemans, Mu~oz, Parks, Roberrs NOES: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: I AGENCY MEMBERS: Stone Home Fundino Reauests Agency Member Stone removed himself from the dais due to a conflict of interest. Senior Planner John Meyer presented the staff report. It was moved by Agency Member Lindemans, seconded by Agency Member Robarts to approve staff recommendations as follows: 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. RDA 95-02 A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA HEREBY AUTHORIZES THE SUBMITTAL OF AN APPLICATION TO THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE FOR FUNDING UNDER THE HOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIPS PROGRAM FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION OF 12 UNITS; THE EXECUTION OF A STANDARD AGREEMENT IF SELECTED FOR SUCH FUNDING AND ANY AMENDMENTS THERETO; AND ANY RELATED DOCUMENTS NECESSARY TO PARTICIPATE IN HOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIPS PROGRAM 3.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. RDA 95-03 A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA HEREBY AUTHORIZES THE SUBMITTAL OF AN APPLICATION TO THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE FOR FUNDING UNDER THE HOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIPS PROGRAM FOR ACQUISITION OF 150 UNITS; THE EXECUTION OF A STANDARD AGREEMENT IF SELECTED FOR SUCH FUNDING AND ANY AMENDMENTS THERETO; AND ANY RELATED DOCUMENTS NECESSARY TO PARTICIPATE IN THE HOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIPS PROGRAM Minutee.rde%042595 -,3- 4125/95 The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: 4 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 ABSTAIN: I AGENCY MEMBERS: AGENCY MEMBERS: AGENCY MEMBERS: AGENCY MEMBERS: Lindemans, Muftoz, Parks, Roberrs None None Stone 4 Facade Imorovement and Non Conformina Sion Removal Prooram Agency Member Stone removed himself from the dais due to a conflict of interest. Senior Planner John Meyer presented the staff report. Agency Member Robarts questioned the signs per building/business, some of which are leased; asking if there is a time limit on how long they could stay, if they put a new sign up and a rebate is granted. Senior Planner Meyer explained that a provision has been included in the contract -' that discourages, particularly in terms of building improvements, someone using this for speculative purposes. There is a provision in the Facade Improvement Program portion that, if they do that within five Wars after getting the rebate, they have to pay the rebate back in full. If a new business comes in, they are required to put in e conforming sign with no rebate. Director of Planning Thornhill clarified that a business owner could use the facade improvement money technically to put up a conforming sign. Agency Member Parks asked about a situation where you have one sign advertising several businesses, is that one sign eligible for the rebate program? Can the business owner of the shopping center get a rebate on that sign, and the individual businesses could also get rebates on the signs on their businesses? Senior Planner Meyer stated the City would consider that as a sign advertising the center; it would have to be determined if it is a conforming sign, and in many cases in Old Town they may not be. The answer to the second question is they may lose the free-standing sign, but they would be compensated by some assistance with the sign on the building. Agency Member Parks asked if there is an appeal process with the program. Senior Planner Meyer, with concurrence of the General Counsel, stated there is no appeal process; this would require administrative approval, which is appealable to the Planning Commission. Minutes.rda~42595 -4- 4/25/~5 5 General Counsel Thorson reiterated there are standard enforcement procedures that staff would follow, if a business chooses not to comply. It was moved by Agency Member Lindemans, seconded by Agency Member Mufioz to approve staff recommendation as follows: 4.1 Approve the Facade Improvement Rebate Program. 4.2 Authorize staff to implement the Facade Improvement and Non-conforming Sign Removal Program 4.3 Appropriate ~40,000 from redevelopment bond proceeds for FY94-95 for the Non-conforming Sign Removal Program. The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: 4 AGENCY MEMBERS: Lindemans, Muf~oz, Parks, Robarts NOES: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: 1 AGENCY MEMBERS: Stone Agency Member Muf~oz was excused from the meeting at 8:47 PM. Certificate of Conformance - Tower Plaza (PA95-0027) Director of Planning Gary Thornhill presented the staff report. It was moved by Agency Member Lindemans, seconded by Agency Member Stone to approve staff recommendations as follows: 5.1 5.2 Approve the Certificate of Conformance for the Tower Plaza Center. Authorize the Chairperson to sign the Certificate and the City Clerk/Agency Secretary to Attest and Record same. The motion was carried as follows: AYES: 4 AGENCY MEMBERS: Lindemans, Parks, Robarts, Stone NOES: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None ABSENT: I AGENCY MEMBERS: Muf~oz Minutes .rde%042595 -5- 4/25/95 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT None given. AGENCY MEMBER'S REPORTS Agency Member Stone agreed with Agency Member Lindemans that there needs to be some cohesivenasa and unity on the projects that Council wants to accomplish in the City. He questionned if there has been any new, updated information regarding funding that the City may be able to obtain and divert to other needy -' projects in the City. Director of Public Works Kicak said explorations of funding sources are constantly going on. Agency Member Stone asked if staff could follow-up by contacting Senator Haynes, requesting expediency in finding some funds, if they exist, so that the City can lobby to get funds to help with the State highway. Executive Director Bradley asked Assistant City Manager McLarney to report to the Agency regarding their recent visit in Sacramento with the staff consultant to the Appropriations body of the Transportation Committee. Assistant City Manager McLamey explained that she met with the consultant to the Appropriations Committee, referred by Senator Bruce Thompson, and was informed that the City's project is not in the State Transportation Improvement Program yet. The City's Director of Public Works is working to have it added to the program, since it cannot be considered for State funding until it is in the STIP. In answer to Agency Member Stone's question as to what that entails, Director of Public Works Kicak explained that it is an application, considered by the California Transportation Commission, which is eventually placed on a priority list by them. Placement on the STIP, however, does not guarantee anything in the near future. In answer to Agency Member Stone's question, Executive Director Bradley explained that this entails much more than just an application; STIP is a five-year Transportation Improvement Program, and each year the projects that are identified in the STIP compete for available funding. He said the City needs to get on that list first to become eligible. Assistant City Manager McLarney added that in talking to the consultant regarding Prop. 111 funds, all of those funds, approximately ~3,000,O00,000,have been allocated for seismic retrofitting of bridges throughout the State, therefore, no Prop. 111 money is available at this time for any of the City's projects. Agency Member Stone confirmed that Council will be addressing their priorities with respect to capital improvements and the upcoming CIP in June. Minutee.rde%042595 -6- 4126/95 Agency Member Robarts reiterated that his top priority is the duck pond, which is a one-shot opportunity that will not come up again. Agency Member Lindemans requested a workshop with staff regarding priorities end funding projects. Agency Member Parks explained that this is one of the reasons the City has a CIP, a five-year plan, which is reviewed every year, and this is scheduled for June 2. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Agency Member Stone, seconded by Agency Member Roberts to adjourn at 8:58 PM to a meeting on May 9, 1995, 8:00 PM, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. The motion was unanimously carried, with Agency Member Muftoz absent. Ronald J. Parks, Chairperson ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk/Agency Secretary Minutes.rda%042595 -7- 4125/95 ITEM 2 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER '~ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Redevelopment Agency Board Members Ronald E. Bradley, Executive Director May 9, 1995 Consideration of Sponsorship for the All Women's Rodeo Prepared by: Mary Jane McLarney RECOMMENDATION: That the Redevelopment Agency consider sponsoring the All Women's Rodeo hosted by Pro Rodeo Sports Company of Temecula Valley to be held at Galway Downs on May 20 and 21, 1995. BACKGROUND: Pro Rodeo Sports Company of Temecula Valley is hosting the All Women's Rodeo at Galway Downs Equestrian Center on May 20 and 21, 1995 at 2:00 p.m. It will air on Prime Time for a one (1) hour program; approximately 45 million people will view this rodeo across the United States, Canada and Mexico. We have been approached by Pro Rodeo Sports to take part in a sponsorship. They have requested a $10,000sponsorship; based on the type of event and media coverage, a $2,500 sponsorship would be appropriate. FISCAL IMPACT: $2500 is available in the Redevelopment Agency Economic Development Budget. Attachment: All Women's Rodeo Information Packet of Temecula Valley For Immediate Kelease PRSC OF TEMECULA VALLEY TO HOST CHAMPIONSHIP RODEO CTemccula, CA), Bucking Broncs, wildly spinning bulls, the best ropers, :barrel racers, clowns... everything that goes into the rich history of our American Hcdtagc. Right now you arc probably thinking about a Rodeo, and naturally Cowboys. Cowboys ropin', ridin' and competing against man & beast for the best times or the best rides just like they do almost every weekend somewhere within a short drive of your home. Well, I am talking about a rodeo, but I'm talking about a rodeo the likes of which haven't been seen in Southern Cnlifomia in some 23 years. A rodeo so spectacular that the top riders, topers-and barrel racers across the US will be making their way to one of the most beautiful places in s,,nny Southern California. You see, the West was not won by man alone, and men arc not the only ones who can tame a wild bull or 'rope like the wind'! Men and women together, working side by side, hand in hand, leamed to survive the very rugged conditions encountered in their quest for a better way of life. Out of this straggle for survival has evolved the professional rodeo we know today. The Pro Rodeo Sports Company of Tcmccnla Valley is proud to present the first Professional Women's Rodeo Association ('PWRA) All Women's Rodeo since 1973, in Southern California. This prestigious event will be held at Galway Downs Equestrian Center, May 20 and 21, 1995. In front of an expected 9,000 spectators, top wonicn professionals from across the United States will compete for prize money exceeding an already guaranteed $6,000.00 in six (6) traditional rodeo events. This exciting rodeo action will take place in. the most beautiful valley of Temecula surrounded by snow capped mountains and rolling hills, green valleys and lush award winning wineries. A family vacation destination, one hour north of San Dicgo's Sea World and the world famous San Diego Zoo, an hour west of Pahn · Springs, 45 minutes from DisneyLand or Knottsherry Farm and just 90 minutes southeast of Los Angeles, Tcmecula is one of the best kept secrets in Southern California. 43500 Ridge Park Dr. · Suite 201 · Temecula, C,¢L 92590 · (POP) 699-8895. Fax (909) 699-9954 PI O I ODEO SPOi TS CO. of Temecula Valley PWRA ALL WOMEN'S PRO RODEO CLASSIC May 20 & 21, 1995 2:00pm Galway Downs Equestrian Center Temecula, CA , $6,000 Added Purse + Bona Allan All Around Saddle Award Design Buckles, Bee Wild Jackets, Professional Choice & Annie Oakley Gift Certificates to event winners and All Around To be Televised on Pdme Time Sports Network (PTSN) Overnight Horee Facility Available (909) 6764545 ALL CONTESTANTS invited to a Sponsor Appreciation Night at Callaway Vineyard & Winery in Temecula- May 18th Rodeo Entry Office (909) 695-5022 Entry Office Opens May 10 - 8:00am PST Entry Office Closes May 11 - 4:00pm PST ~,~,,~ Judges: Bill Bames/Melissa Phillips A),!,, ~ ~'°'' PRIME TIME SPORTS NETWORK Prime Time Sports Network has apprcudmately 45 million viewers nationwide. Th~ following is the, dollar valuo of a thirty (30) s~ond spot on Prime Time Sports Network TIME OF AIRING 8:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m. 12:00 p.m. - 6:00 p.m. 6:00 p.m. - 10:00 pan. 10:00 p.m. - 12.'00 a.m. COST