Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout052395 CC AgendaIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (909) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II] AGENDA TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL A REGULAR MEETING COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER 30875RANCHO VISTA ROAD MAY 23, 1995- 7:00 PM 5:30 PM - Closed Session of the City Council pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9{A) Claim of Chades and Sharon Miller end § 54956.9, Pending Litigation, Hill vs. City of Temecula. Ordinance: No. 95-0~ Resolution: No. 95-43 CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Jeffrey Stone presiding I nvocati on: Reverend George Simmons, House of Praise Flag Salute: Councilmember Robarts ROLL CALL: Lindemans, Mu~oz, Parks, Robarts, Stone PRESENTATIONS/ PROCLAMATIONS Certificates of Appreciation - The Women's Club of Temecula, Paradise Chevrolet and the Law Offices of Lorenz, Alhadeff, Cannon and Rose PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 30 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Council on items that are not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council on an item not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak' form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk before the Council gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. R:~Agerde%062316 I CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made at this time. A total, not to exceed, ten (10) minutes will be devoted to these reports. CONSENT CALENDAR 3 4 5 Standard Ordinance Adootion Procedure RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the minutes of May 9, 1995. Resolution Aoorovina List of Demands RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 95- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A Public Nuisance Abatement- 30301 Nicolas Road RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Set the date of a I~ublic hearing for June 13, 1995, at 7:00 PM, for the purpose of confirming the cost to the City for the abatement of a public nuisance at 30301 Nicolas Road. Solicitation of Construction Bids for Access Ramos Project - PW 95-04 RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Approve the plans land specifications and authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit public construction bids for Access Ramps - Project PW95-04. R:~Agenda~D62386 2 6 7 8 9 Contract Chancie Order No. 4 for Winchester Road Interim Street Imorovements, Project PW94-03 RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Approve Contract Change Order No. 4 for Winchester Road Interim Street Improvements, Project PW94-03 for Additional Aggregate Base - Class 2 in the amount of ~27,660.00. 6.2 Approve a budget transfer in the amount of $24,537.64from the Pavement Management Project to the Winchester Road Interim Street Improvements Project. Solicitation of Construction Bids for Sidewalk Imorovements on Rancho Vista Road and Mira Loma Drive - Project PW94-19 RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Approve the construction plans and specifications and authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit public construction bids for sidewalk improvements on Rancho Vista Road and Mira Loma Drive - Project PW94-19. Suoolemental No. 007 to Local Aqencv Agreement for Federal Aid Projects No. 08-5459 for Federal Grant Funding for Pala Road Bridge RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 95- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PROGRAM SUPPLEMENTAL NO. 007, TO LOCAL AGENCY AGREEMENT NO. 08° 5459, BETWEEN THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR FEDERAL AID PROJECT NO. BRLS-5459{003),PALA ROAD BRIDGE Amended Memorandum of Understanding - Access to Winchester Road and State Route 79 South RECOMMENDATION: 9.1 Approve the amended Memorandum of Understanding with Caltrans and authorize the Mayor to sign. R:'Ut~,e~daV)62396 3 10 11 12 13 14 Tree Trimmino Prooram in Starlight Ridoe Area RECOMMENDATION: 10. 1 Authorize staff to call for bids for Tree Trimming Program in the Starlight Ridge Area. Release Traffic Sienal MitiQation Bond in Tract No. 26861-3 RECOMMENDATION: 11.1 Authorize the release of Traffic Signal Mitigation Bond in Tract No. 26861-3 and Direct the City Clerk to so notify the Developer and Surety. Stoo Controls on Milky Way Drive at Asteroid Way RECOMMENDATION: 12.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 95- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING STOP SIGNS Easement from Tomond Prooerties Limited for Maintenance of Looo Detectors at Del Rio Road and Front Street RECOMMENDATION: 13.1 Accept the easement from Tomond Properties Limited for the maintenance of loop detectors at Del Rio Road and Front Street. Resolution Reouestinc) Inland Emoire Postmark Desiqnation RECOMMENDATION: 14.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 95- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA REQUESTING INLAND EMPIRE POSTMARK DESIGNATION R:'V~gerdaV)62396 4 PUBLIC HEARINGS Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before · public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing. 15 Planning Aoolication No. PA 94-0098, Nicolas Vallev Special Study RECOMMENDATION: 15.1 Receive report and direct staff to prepare a General Plan Amendment to delete Section IV(d), Special Study Overlay, from the Land Use Element of the General Plan. COUNCIL BUSINESS 16 Sorav Iniection Machine (Requested by Mayor Stone) RECOMMENDATION: 16.1 Review and discuss the report on Spray Injection Machines, and provide direction to staff. 17 Temecula Emolovee Aoorenticeshio Model (T.E.A.M.) Proaram RECOMMENDATION: 17.1 Receive this report and provide staff direction. 18 ADoroval of Joint Traffic Safety Proaram (Ooeration SCAIR) RECOMMENDATION: 18.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 95- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING AN AGREEMENT TO PARTICIPATE IN A JOINT TRAFFIC SAFETY PROJECT WITH THE CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL, THE RIVERSIDE SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT AND OTHER SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES R:'%Agerda~062356 6 19 20 Discussion of Possible Board of Supervisors Action to Cease Fundina for Western Riverside Council of Governments (Discussion Item Only - Placed on the agenda at the request of Councilmember Roberts) Consideration of Street Namino Proqram RECOMMENDATION: 20.1 Approve in concept, a policy to allow the American Cancer Society the opportunity to auction a street name as a fund raising project. 20.2 Direct staff to formalize the necessary policy and procedures to implement this program. DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS CITY MANAGER'S REPORT CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: June 13, 1995, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. R:~Aeendm%O623H e TEMECULA COMMUNITY SER~CES DISTRICT MEETING - ~o be held st 8:00) ........... CALL TO ORDER: President Ronald H. Roberts ROLL CALL: DIRECTORS: Lindemans, Mur~oz, Parks, Stone, Roberts PUBLIC COMMENT: A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Board of Directors on items that are not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to .the Board of Directors on an item not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk before the Board of Directors gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors, should present a completed pink "Request to Speak" to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address for the record. CONSENT CALENDAR I Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of May 9, 1995. 2 Acceptance of Landscape Maintenance Areas and Residential Street LightinQ RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Accept the deeds for the TCSD landscape maintenance areas and direct the City Clerk to record the documents; 2.2 Accept Tract No. 22762 into the Rancho Highlands landscape maintenance rate level. 2.3 Accept the residential street lights. R:V~genda%062316 7 3 Award Professional Services Contract for Materials TestinQ DurinQ the Construction of Rancho California SPorts Park Improvement Project No. PW94-O7CSD RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Award a Professional Services Contract to Geotechnical and Environmental Engineers, Inc. (GEE) to provide material testing services during the construction of Rancho California Sports Park Improvement Project No. PW94-O7CSD, in an amount not to exceed $18,634. 3.2 Appropriate $18,634 for the services contract and $1,864 for 10% contingency for a total of $20,498 from Development Impact Fees to the Capital Project Fund. DISTRICT BUSINESS 4 Consideration of Fee Reduction for Filming at the Community Recreation Center RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Consider a fee reduction for filming at the Community Recreation Center for Weekend in the Country, Inc. DEPARTMENTAL REPORT GENERAL MANAGERS REPORT - Bradley DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT - Nelson BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS ADJOURNMENT: Next meeting: June 13, 1995, 8:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. R:'~4enda%062386 8 TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Ronald J. Parks presiding ROLL CALL: AGENCY MEMBERS: Lindemans, Mufioz, Roberrs, Stone, Parks PUBLIC COMMENT: A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Redevelopment Agency on items that are not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Agency on an item nO1; listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink 'ReqUest to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk bqfore the Agency gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. CONSENT CALENDAR I Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of May 9, 1995. AGENCY BUSINESS 2 Temecula Shuttle Project RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the execution of a lease of City-owned property at Front and Sixth Streets (APN #922-023-020)to Ed and Kathleen Dool under terms and conditions described in Attachment A in a form acceptable to the Executive Director and Agency Attorney; 2.2 Approve an RDA Rehabilitation Loan of $1 00,000 for the construction of the Temecula Shuttle project under the terms described in Attachment B; 2.3 Approve the appropriation of $97,423.76 for the purchase of property located at 41953 Main Street, Temecula, California (APN #922-034-0291 )in accordance with Redevelopment Agency action of December 20, 1994. (Attachment C). R:%Age~de'qe062396 · EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT AGENCY MEMBER'$ REPORTS ADJOURNMENT: Next Meeting: June 13, 1995, 8:00 PM, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. R:~/~end,~062386 10 Ceraficate of Appreciaaon In appreciation and gratitude from the City Council on behalf of the citizens of the City of Temecula, For their generous support of the Old Town Temecula Senior Center by assisting in the purchase of a handicapped equipped van to better serve the needs of the Senior Citizens of Temecula. IN WITNESS WH ~:st~X)F, I have hereunto affixed my hand and official seal this 23rd day of May, 1995 Jeffrey E. Stone Mayor June S. Greek, CMC City Clerk ITEM 1 ITEM 2 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL HELD MAY 9, 1995 A regular meeting of the Temecula City Council was called to order at 7:05 PM at the Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Street, Temecula, California. Mayor Jeffrey E. Stone presiding. PRESENT 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Lindemans, Mu~oz, Parks, Roberrs, Stone ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None Also present were City Manager Ronald Bradley, City Attorney Peter M. Thorson, and City Clerk June S. Greek. EXECUTIVE SFSSION A meeting of the City of Temecule City Council was called to order at 5:45 PM. It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Roberrs to adjourn to Executive Session pursuant to Government Code Sections: 1. §54956.8, CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR, Property: Bounded .by Rancho California Road and Ynez Road, e portion of Assessor's Parcel Number 944-330-006; Negotiating parties: City of Temecula and Kernper Real Estate Company; Under negotiation: Proposed sale of real property. 2. §54956.8, CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR, Property: Bounded by Margarita Road and Rancho California Road, Negotiating Parties: City of Temecula and Kemper Real Estate Company; Under Negotiation: Purchase of property. 3. § 54956.8,CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR, Property: 43106 Business Park Drive; Negotiating parties: City of Temecula and Grubb and Ellis; Under negotiation: price and terms of pa.yment. The motion carried with Councilmember Muttoz absent. Councilmember Mu~oz joined the Executive Session at 6:15 PM. City Attorney Thorson reported that no action was taken in closed session. INVOCATION The invocation was given by Bishop Konrad Lee, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The audience was led in the flag salute by Councilmember Parks. Minutes%5',09%95 - 1 - 05116/95 City Council Minutes May 9, 1995 PRESENTATIONS/ PROCLAMATIONS Mayor Stone proclaimed the month of May to be, "Water Awareness Month." Mayor Stone proclaimed the month of May to be, "Mental Health Month.'" PUBLIC COMMENTS None given. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Councilmember Parks reported that the SCAG Regional Council has chosen Temecula to hold their annual retreat on June I st and 2nd. He requested that the City Council do something special for the SCAG Regional Council as they will have 40-50 members present. Mayor Pro Tam Lindemans reported facts from a United States Department of Defense Report, including population end job statistics for Riverside County. Councilmember Mu~oz reported on a meeting he attended on behalf of the City Council, April 28th, regarding the Santa Margarita River/Santa Ana Mountains Bio Reserve Strategic Plan. He reported the focus of the discussion had to do the with the Endangered Species Act and environmentalism in general. An unidentified speaker representing the Nature Conservancy, gave a brief overview of the organization, its goals and accomplishments. Mayor Stone reported that the City of Tamecula has been pro-active in controlling funds and bring jobs to the area, stating Temecula's unemployment numbers have dropped below the average for Riverside County. He also thanked Target, Costco and K-Mart and the citizens of Temecula for donating funds to assist victims of the Oklahoma tragedy and reported that a check for ~3,100.00 was sent to the Salvation Army in Oklahoma. Councilmember Robarts reported a Sister City delegation from Voorburg, Holland will be visiting Tamecula starting tomorrow. Mayor Stone also reported that the City has done all that is possible to implement the Traffic Director Program at the Winchester Intersection and will continue to work with Caltrans to work out problems which are holding up implementation of this program. Minutes%5~09~,95 -2- 05116/95 CiW Council Minute May 9. 1995 CONSENT CALENDAR Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans announced he would abstain on Item 2.2 since he did not attend the meeting. Councilmember Parks requested the removal of Item No. 7 from the Consent Calendar to hear the public comment requested on that item. Mayor Stone commented on Item No. 5, stating he spoke with Moreland and Associates and they have agreed to not increase their fees for the upcoming year. It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Lindsmarts, seconded by Councilmember Roberts to approve Consent Calendar Items 1-6 and 8-10, with Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans abstaining on Item 2.2; The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Lindemans, Mufioz, Parks, Roberrs, Stone NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None Standard Ordinance Adoption Procedure 1.1 Motion to waive the reading of included in the agenda. Minutes 2.1 2.2 2.3 the text Approve the minutes of April 11, 1995. of all ordinances and resolutions Approve the minutes of April 19, 1995, (Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans abstained.) Approve the minutes of April 25, 1995. Resolution Aoorovina Iist of Demands 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 9541 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A Minutee%SM:)9%95 -3- 05116/95 Mev 9.1995 Ciw Council Minutes ~ e e 8 9 City Treasurer's Reoort 4.1 Receive and file the City Treasurer's Report as of March 31, 1995. Contract for Audit Services for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30.1995 5.1 Approve a one-year extension with Moreland and Associates to provide audit services for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1995. Extension of Bankina Services 6.1 Approve a two-year extension with First Interstate Bank to provide banking services through June 30, 1997. Acceotance of Public Imorovements in Parcel Mao No. 2~6~9 8.1 8.2 8.3 8.4 8.5 Accept the public improvements in Parcel Map No. 22629; Authorize reduction in Faithful Performance Security amounts for improvement of streets and drainage; Authorize the release of the Subdivision Monumentation security amount; Direct the City Attorney to prepare reconveyance documents; Direct the City Clerk to so notify the Developer. the Suoolement No. 006 to Local AQencv - State AQreement for Federal Aid Project No. STPLN-5459. I-1511-215 Corridor Study 9.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 9542 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING SUPPLEMENT NO. 006, TO LOCAL AGENCY AGREEMENT NO. 08-5459, BETWEEN THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR FEDERAL AID PROJECT NO. STPLN-5459, I- 1511-215 CORRIDOR STUDY 10 Summary on the' Interim Fire Station 10.1 Receive and file the summary for the interim Fire Station located at Linfield School. Minutes%S%09%95 -4- 05116/95 Ciw Council Minute May 9, 1995 7. "Please Save Lives - Don't Drink and Drive" Sian Program Chris Martinelli, 30255 Corte Cantania, representing Temecula Community Partnership, stated the seven proposed signs are gifts from Temecula Community Partnership and there is no fiscal impact associated with the program. She requested the Council approve this item. Councilmember Parks requested a better map showing proposed locations of signs. Public Works Director Joe Kicak clarified the location of signs. It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember Roberts to approve staff recommendation as follows: 7.1 Approve the "Please Save Lives - Don't Drink and DriVe" sign program proposed by the Temecula Community Partnership. The motion was unanimously carried. COUNCIL BUSINESS 11 City Attorney Service Anelvsis Human Resources Administrator Grant Yates presented the staff report. It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Lindemans to approve staff recommendation as follows: 11.1 Approve continuation of contract City Attorney services; 11.2 Approve retaining Peter Thorson and Burke, Willjams and Sorenson, as the City Attorney. The motion was unanimously carried. .. City Attorney Thorson thanked the City Council for their support and pledged his continued efforts to provide the best service possible and to reduce costs whenever possible. RECESS Mayor Stone called a recess at 8:02 PM to change the tape. The meeting was reconvened following the previously scheduled Community Services District and Redevelopment Agency Meeting at 8:43 PM. Minutes%5%09%95 -5- 05116/95 City Council Minutes May 9, 1995 CITY MANAGER'S REPORT None given. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT None given. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Councilmember Parks, seconded by Councilmember Roberrs to adjourn at 8:43 PM to a meeting on May 23, 1995, 7.:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. The motion was unanimously carried. ATTEST: Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk Minutee%~09%95 -6- 05116/95 ITEM 3 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ~ ALtOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN i<XH~KIT A THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOI-LOWS: 5eetion 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A have been audited by the City Manager, and thai the same are hereby allowed in the mount of $530,719.58. Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. APPROVI~ AND ADOPTED, this 23rd day of May, 1995. ATTEST: ieffrey E. Stone, Mayor June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk [SEAL] Rssos63 I STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMF_L"ULA) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do certify that the foregoing Re,~lution No. 95- was duly adopted at a reSular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 23rd day of May, 1995 by the following roll call vote: AYES: 0 NOES: 0 ABS~: 0 COUNTERS: None COUNCrLI~-MBERS: None COUNTERS: None June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS 05/04/95 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 05/11/95 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 05/23/95 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 05/04/95 TOTAL PAYROLL: TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 0~/I)I/IS COUNCIL MEETING: DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND: CHECKS: 001 GENERAL 100 GAS TAX 120 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FUND 140 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT 165 RDA4.OW/MOD 190 COllAUNITY 8ERVI~E8 D~b'~III~T 101 TCSD SERVICE t. EVB. A 192 TCSD SERVICE L.EVB. B 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ (CIP) 220 MARGARITA ROAD RENB. 0iST. 250 CAPITAL PROJECTS - TCSD 280 RDA-.CIP 300 INStRANCE 310 VEHICLES 320 INFORMATION8 SYSTEMS 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 340 FACILITIES 380 RDA-DEBT SERVICE 390 TCSD DEBT SERVICE PAYROLL: 001 GENERAL 10o GAS TAX 165 RDA-.t.OWNOD . 190 TCSD 161 TC,,q0 SERVICE LEVEL A 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 193 TC8~ SERVICE LEVEL C 280 RDA-CIP 393 INSUIV~CE 320 INFOFIMATION SYSTEMS 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 340 FACILITIES TOTAL BY FUND: $ 146,785.25 74,534.40 133,285.97 121,153.96 $ 330,719.58 N,721.84 38,2e5.26 0.00 0.00 285.27 S2,74e.20 5,248.33 21,630.53 2,72~.24 0.00 105,557.55 0.00 0.00 35,2~0.12 58,226.12 0.00 4,910.20 4,974.3~ 0.00 3,641 75,2so.as 13,852.87 468.70 22,885.64 464.00 620.26 1,80e J6 1 221.77 1,5e5.03 718.62 121,158.96 530,710.53 VOUC~RE~ 17:51 C l TY OF TENECULA VOIJCHER/CIIECK REGISTER Iralit ALL PEItlQI)S PAGE FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FU!¢ 100 GAS TAX FUND 165 RDA DEV- LCX~//N(X) SET ASIDE 190 Cali~ITY SERVICES DISTRICT 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 193 TC:~ SERVICE LEVEL C 210 CAPITAL iHPROVENENT PROJ FIID 280 REDEVELOPI~NTAGENCT - CIP 300 INSURANCE 320 iNFORNATiOII SYSTENS · 30, SUPPORT SERViCES 340 FACILITIES TOTAL mT 67,127.52 13,5~.55 20,573.77 4,152.73 21,600.09 1,865.98 3,742.19 1,056.90 3,888.23 4,052.95 4,512.85 1/,6,765.25 VOUCHRE2 VUUCHER/ CHECK NLNBER 1704, A53682 ,r,53682 4.53682 4.53682 z,53682 4.53682 4.53682 4.53682 4.53682 4.53682 4.53682 z,53682 4.53682 23431 23431 23/,31 23431 234,31 23431 23431 ~31 1431 17:~5 CHECK DATE 05/0~/95 05/Q~/95 0510~/95 0510~1~5 0510~195 0510~195 05/0~/95 0510~/95 0510~/95 000283 OOO283 OOO283 000283 000283 O00283 000283 000283 000283 000283 0430283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 000283 O00283 000283 0O028:5 VEI)CIt M FIRSTAX (Ill) FIRSTAX (IllS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX CIRS) FIRSTAX CIRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX CIRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX CIRS) FIRSTAX CIRS) FIRSTAX (IRS) FIRSTAX (El)D) FIRSTAX FIRSTAX FIRSTAX CEDD) FIRSTAX CE!X)) FIRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (EDD) FIRSTAX (EDO) FIRSTAX FIRSTAX (BX) FIRSTAX {EDO) FIRSTAX CEDO) FIRSTAX FIRSTAX CEDD) FIRSTAX (EDD) ANS'TMS ANS'TMS AMS"TMS AMS-TMS AMS'TMS AMS-TMS AMS-TMS AMS'TMS AMS'TMS AMS'TMS CITY OF TBIECULA VIXJCHER/ClIECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEN DESCRIPT!~ 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDEItAL 000283 FEDERAL 000~83 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000?.83 FEDERAL 000?83 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000~3 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 000283 FEDERAL 0430283 lETCARE 000283 SICNeE 000283 HEDICAIE 000283 SICARE 000283 SICARE 000283 MEN CARE 0004~ STATE ~ STATE 0004~ STATE 0004~ STATE 0004~ STATE ~ STATE 0004~ STATE 0004~ STATE 0004.~ STATE 0004~ STATE OOL~ STATE 00e':~./: STATE DEPOSZT FOR RESETTING POSTAGE DEPOSIT FOR RESETTING POSTAm: DEPOSIT FOR RE~'TTING POSTAGE DEPOSIT FOR RESETTING POSTAI~ DEPOSIT FOR RESETTING POSTAGE DEPOSIT FOR IREJETTING POSTAGE DEPOSIT FOR RE~'TTIIIG POSTAGE DEPOSIT FaR RESETTING POSTAGE DEPOSIT FOIt RESETTING POSTAGE AC~:QUNT WER Z80-2070 32o-2o?o ool -2off) loo-2o7o 19o-2o7o 192-20T0 193-2070 280-2070 300-2070 001-100-999-5230 001-14.0-999-5230 001-1990 001-110-999-5Z50 001-150-999-5230 001-120-999-5230 001-161-g99-5230 001-162-999-5Z50 100-16&-604.-5230 100-1990 ITEN NCUMT 12,061.93 2,221.38 40.17 2,74.1.39 4.9.4.0 - 70.68, 213.80 171,0~ 23.32 105.9~ 119,% Z,819,6~ 4.99.12 14. 786.32 17.78 64..10 51 8.ZO 57.96 4.2.Tf 8.00 :3,272.38 581 ,:31 10.77 561.69 16.16 8.91 4.5,86 56.16 7.4.5 18.96 1.60 14..4.2 156.09 36.09 /,2.12 105.36 /,01 ./5 135.18 55.58 1.17 PAGE 1 CHECK 4.,776.10 YOUCratE2 ' ' 9~/9S VUUCHER/ CHECK NUI48ER Z5~1 23A31 23~32 23~32 5435 23~37 23437 23439 Z~39 234~0 2..................~40 ZS~0 Z5~1 Z54~1 Z.~61 Z.~I ZSz,~I Z54~1 Z~61 Z5~1 Z5~1 17:~5 CHECK DATE 00/OrdgS 00/04/95 ~1~1~ ~1~1~ ~1~1~ ~/~1~ ~1~1~ ~1~1~ ~1~/95 ~!~/95 ~1~/95 ~1~1~ 0010~/95 0010~195 0010~19S 0010~/95 0S10~/95 0010~195 0010~/95 0010~/9S OO068O 000765 000765 000116 000116 000116 0430116 000116 000116 000116 000116 000116 000116 000116 00O116 O00116 000101 001323 OO1323 OOO95O O0095O 000131 000131 000131 000131 000160 000160 000160 000160 000160 000160 O0O16O 000160 000160 000~7 M ANS-TRS ANS-TNS AT&T AT&T AVPVISINP~S AVPVISI~P~S AVPVISZ~P~S AVPVISZ~P~S AVPV~SINP~S AVPVISI~P~S AVPVISI~P~S AVPVISINP~S AVPVISINP~S AVPVISINPLANS AVPVISINP~S AVPVISINP~S AVPVISINP~S ADKINS, ROBERT STEVEN ANERIGAS APPLE ONE, INC. ARROUHEAD UATER, INC. ARRUdHEAD MATER, INC. BEIJING LONGEVITY, INC. CALIFORNIAN, INC.- DISP CALIFORNIAN, INC.' DISP CARL UARREN & CO., INC. CARL UARREN & CO., INC. CARL UARREN & CO., INC. CARL UARREN & CO., INC. COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN COLGIilAL LIFE & ACCIDEN COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN COLONIAL LIE & ACCIDEN COLONIAL LIFE & ACC!DEN COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN COLONIAL LIFE & ACClDEN EIX. QNIAL LIFE & ACEIDEN COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDEN CCHTRONIX OF HENET CITY OF TENECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEH DESCRIPTION DEPOSIT FOR RESETTING POSTAGE DEPOSIT FOR RESETTING POSTAGE LONG DISTANCE SERVICE LONG DISTANCE S~RVS 000116 AVP 000116 AVP REVE 000116 AVP 000116 AVP 000116 AVP 000116 AW 000116 AW 000116 AW 000116 AVP 000116 AVP 000116 AVP 000116 AVP 000116 AVP DED TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS VEHICLE PEOPI CONVERSION B&S TB4P HELP b//E 6/15-6/22 NEER BOTTLED UATER/CITY HALL BOTTLE MATER FOR NAIlIT IREMS TCSD INSTRUCTON EARNINGS JON RECRUITKENT ADS ADS FOR TCSD SEASONAL POSITION DESHITH ARDITH, 0212/,194, CUCCIA,THERESA & SHAME 9/2219'5 HUBLICK mOLD, 06102/9~ DUARE,SALVADON CAI4POS 01/18/9~ 2 BATTERY FOR HAND HELD RADIOS ACCGUNT mER 190-180-999-5230 320-199-999-5230 320-199-999-5208 320-199-999-5208 001 -Z510 001 -Z510 001 -Z510 100-Z510 165-Z510 190-ZSTO 191 -Z510 19'5-2310 280-Z510 300-2310 360-Z510 001-1180 001-2310 190-18;5-999-5'530 001-162-999-5216 280-199-999-5250 )&O-199-999-S2&O 100-16~-601-5260 190-18~-999-5:~0 001-150-999-525A 190-180-999-525& 300-199-999-5205 300-199-999-5205 300-199-999-5205 300-199-999-5200 001-2330 190-2330 001-2330 100-2330 165-Z530 190-2330 191 -Z530 193-Z5~0 280-~330 100-16~-601-5218 ITEN 152.2~, 1.88 5.OO .32 - 1.52 1.52- ~87.59 81.63 6.18 52.9O 4.39 5.36 16.19 16.70 9.75 1.52 ~S .00 150.86 19.09 3A3.13 122.13 116.00 317.75 39.75 39./S 14~ .71 12.9~ 6.67 83.6~ 16.35 17.53 6.67 161.63 CHECK ANOUlrr 1,143.4,8 5.32 580.65 28.8O 1:57.10 899.01 161.63 VOUCHRE2 ~-*~,/95 vuuCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 23~3 ~t,:~.~ 23~5 23~6 Z5~7 23,r~9 /"*~50 50 23~5'1 2..~52 23~53 23,r~53 23~54 23~55 23~56 2~56 23~57 23~57 23~57 23~57 23~57 23~57 23~57 ¼58 /*--~58 17:45 CNEI3: DATE 0511~195 0510~195 0510~195 0510z,/95 0~1041~ 0510~1~5 0510~/~5 05/0~/f5 0510~/~5 0510~/~5 ~II)OR NLIIER ~1535 OO0155 OOQI~ (X)01~ QQ0156 OO0156 OO0156 ~16~ ~1669 ~1669 001669 ~1~1 0~1~ ~11~ 00116 0004,81 000,(,81 M CODDOVA, IRENE CREEI~IDE TE)(ACO, INC. DAVLIN CITY OF TNIX, ILA VOUCIk"RICNECK REGISTER Flit ALL PERIODS ITEH DESCRIPTIOD REFIJND FOR TCSD CLASS Pt,! POOL TRUCK REPAIRS & illIT AUDIO TAPING OF &/25 aIMCIL M DEIrrlCM. E OF CALIFORNIA 000156 DENTICJUtE OF CALIFORtlIA OO01S6 DENTIC. ARE OF CALIFORNIA 000156 DENTICJUtE OF CALIFOIIIA 000156 DENTlONE OF CALIFORNIA 000156 DIVERSIFIED TEMPORARY S DUNN ED4dNU)S CDEPOItATIO DUNN ENMUIDS ODRPOIATIO DUNN EDMNU)S CORPOIUtTIO DUNN ENMIIDS CODPORATIO EFFECTIVE Fffi3NOTIOIIS, l EFFECTIVE PROle"TIONS, I ENTERPRISE RENT-A-CAR ENTERPRISE RENT-A-CAR EXaL RENTAL CENTER FEDERAL EXPIESE, INC. FREEDOI4NATERIALS FREEDON NATERIALS G T E CALIFODNIA" PAY!4 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYI4 GNIZ, VICICl GEOTECHNICAL & ENVIRONM GEOTECNNICAL & ENVIROIN GLENHIES OFFICE PRCOUCT GLENHIES OFFICE PR(X)UCT GLENNIESOFFICE PNXX/CT GLENHIES OFFICE PNX)UCT GLENNIES OFFICE PRC])UCT GLENHIES OFFICE PRGXJCT GLENNIES OFFICE PR(X)t/CT GROUP ANERICA - VOLUNTA 61ffilJP HRICA - VOLIJNTA DENT-REV DENTICAR DEN-N41N DENT -ADV DENTIC, JUt TB4P RELP WE &r~ ClMINGA IN NAIliT StJPPLIES (GOOF OFF) TAX RECTCLED ENAFFITi PAINT TAX POOr. SAFETY COt~tlNG BOOK FREIGHT DEPOSIT:COIIF;SIERRA:R.tISTON DEPOSIT:CONF;SIERRA:R.IESTOD SKIPLON)EN RENTAL FOR IN EXPRESS 14ALL SERVICES PURCHASE OF HATERIAL$ FOR TC$O PURCHASE OF NATENIALS FOR TC$O 909 699-0128 SEN USAGE 909 6~9-2/,75 CITY YAItD 909 699-6267 FILl4 a3UNCIL REFUII) FOR TIeD CLASS NUU. YSIS RELATIVE TO X-NOISTUR PLAN CK COST FOR HEALTH RE NISC OFFICE SUPPLIES MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES NISC OFFICE SUPPLIES MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES NISCOFFICE StJPPLIES NISC OFFICE SUPPLIES NISC OFFICE SUPPLIES 000430 VL REVER 000430 VOL LIFE MER 190-183-&980 100-16~.-604)-521/,. 001-100-999-5250 001-1180 001-2~0 001-23&0 OO1-1180 001 001-16;I-999-5118 100-16~-601-5218 100-16&-601-5218 100-16&-601-5218 100-16&-601-SZ18 190-183-999-5310 190-183-f99-5310 001-14,0-999-57.61 001-1990 1OD-164-601-5Z58 280-199-999-5230 lg0-180-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 320-199-999-5208 1OD-16/,-601-5208 320-199-999-5208 190-183 4992 001-1fi-999-5~/0 001-111-999-54,/0 OO1-1Z0-999-5220 001-1&0-999-5220 001-1&0-999-5220 OD1-l&O-999-5220 190-180-999-5220 190-180-999-52Z0 001-14,0-999-5220 001-2510 001-2510 ITEN 62.00 18o:71 7.8~. 15.00 7.8~ 7.8A 325.08 367.5O 15.00 64.86 185.1& z'r/.2o 9.50 &9.57 81.89 1,053.47 39.~ ~.~ 211.50 59.OO 190.80- 138.91 PAGf 3 CHECE mOUNT 180.7'1 796.~5 125 382.50 250.OO 27/.20 9.50 131 .~6 1,119.52 6.OO V~UCHRE2 %/95 VUUCHBU CHECK 2~58 23~58 Z5658 Z~58 23~58 23658 23458 23~58 27~58 2~58 23659 17:45 CHECK DATE 05/0/,/95 05/0/,./95 05104/95 05/(X.,,95 05/06/95 05/iX/95 05104195 05104195 05104195 05/04/95 05104195 05104195 05104195 05104195 05104195 05104195 05104195 05104195 05104195 05104195 05104195 05104195 05104195 05104195 05104195 05104195 05104195 05104195 05104/95 05104195 05104195 05104/95 05104/95 05104195 05104/95 05104/95 05104/95 05104/95 05104/95 05104/95 VEW mR 0O043O OOO430 000~30 O0(Y,30 00G430 000~30 OO0430 OO0430 OOO43O 001697 001536 001536 001536 001536 001536 001536 001536 001536 001536 001536 001536 001536 001536 001536 001536 001536 001536 001536 001536 0015:36 0015:36 001536 001536 0015:56 OO1O60 VENIml IL4J4E ~ ANERZCA - VOLLITA IU)UP NIRZCA - VOUJIITA GROUP NIEItZCR - VOUJNTA GRiXJP AMERICA - VOLUNTA GROUP NIERICA - VOLUNTA GROUP AMERICA - VOLUNTA GROUP HRICA - VOLUNTA GROUP HRICA - VQLUIITA GRaJP HRICA - VOLUNTA GRC)tJP MERICA - VQLUNTA NAITFQID LIFE iIIJRANCE HARTFIlE) LIFE filllANCE HARTFQIE) LIFE IlllANCE HARTFORD LIFE II~URNIC~ NARTFQRD LIFE III~IIAIICE NARTFQRI) LIFE INSURANCE HARTFOIl) LIFE llCE HARTFORD LIFE INSIMANCE NARTFOR!) LIFE INStlAMCE MARTFOIl) LIFE INSURANCE HARTFOlD LIFE INSURANCE HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE HARTFeD LIFE !ICE HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE HARTFORD LIFE INSUP. AliCE HARTFGR!) LIFE INSURANCE HARTFOm) LIFE INStJRANCE HARTF(XtD LIFE INStmANCE HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE HARTFQIm LIFE INSURANCE HARTFORD LIFE INStJP. ANCE HARTFOlD LIFE INS~CE HARTFORD LIFE IMStJRANCE IIARTFQR!) LIFE IN~tleANCE NARTFGRD LIFE liCE NNtTFGRD LIFE INIteJUlCE NAItTFOII) LIFE IN~UIANI:E &eTFGRI) LIFE !!I~CE HARTRID LIFE !ICE HARTFOIl) LIFE INSURANE HARTFOlD LIFE ll~ HARTHID LIFE IIISlJRAIICE lUeTFGRD LIFE HARTFORD LIFE INStJe~CE HARTFQm) LIFE HARTFORD LIFE INSLItANCE HYATT CITY OF TENEIXILA VOUClIER/CNECK EEGIITER FOR ALL PERICI)S 11t1¢ DESCRIPTIQN 000430 VIX, LIFE OCNII3Q VQL LIFE INNII3Q VQL LIFE 0¢N)430 VOL LIFE 0¢NI430 VL RDVAN 0004,30 VOL LIFE QQOA30 VIX, LIFE 000630 VOL LIFE 000,30 VOL LIFE IX)(X30 VQL LIFE TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 0015~ LIFE INS 0015136 LIFE INS 0015~6 LIFE INS 001536 LIFE INS 001536 LIFE INS 0015~6 LIFE INS 001536 LIFE INS 001536 LIFE INS 001536 LIFE INS 001536 LIFE INS Q015)6 LIFE INS 001536 LIFE INS 0015~6 Lll) 0015~6 LTD 001536 Lll) 001536 LTD 001536 Lll) 001536 Lll) 001536 LTD 001536 LTD 001536 ' LTD 001536 LTD 001536 Lll) 001536 LI~ 001536 STD CONF:GTC HOTEL RCXX4:T.NAFELI NLNBER 100-;510 190-2510 19~-;510 34~)-~510 001-2510 001-;510 100-;510 190-2510 lr~-2510 ':~,0-2510 O01 -Z~O 1~-2360 190-2360 t91-2~0 192-2360 193-Z~0 260-23~0 300-2360 320-2360 3~0-23~0 001-2380 I00o2380 1~5-2380 190-2380 191 -Z380 192-2380 193-2380 320-2)80 320-199-999-5258 ITEN 15.79 29.69 6.00 ./,1 190.80 · 138.91 - 15.1'9 29.69 6.00 .41 108.00 580.50 110.00 2.50 1.~.50 6.50 10.~ 15.50 8.50 2.50 10.00 10.00 21.50 623.07 116.30 14,0.31 5.17 16.10 12.61 1.83 13.89 5.17 16.87 1,~8.88 253.17 8.63 9.87 11.26 35.08 30.Z8 11.26 4~.00 PAGE CHED: ANQUNT ~81.60 108.00 3,9&5.50 V~JCHRE2 VuuCHER/ CHECK MUMBER ~9 ~9 25470 25~71 ~71 25~71 ~71 25~72 2,~73 25~ ZT~7~ Z3~75 25~76 Z~77 Z.~r~78 17:~5 CHECK DATE 05/0~/95 05/06/95 0510~/95 0510~195 0510~195 0~!0~195 051o~195 0510~195 0510~195 0510~195 0~10~195 VENDOR NtmER 000196 00019& 000194, 000196 00019~ 0001~ 000194, 00019/, 001708 001708 001708 001652 000206 000209 001522 001905 000727 001676 VENOOR M I CNAREYIREMENTTRUS I C'N A RETIREMENT TITUS I CMARETIREMENT TRUS I C M A RETIREMENT TITUS I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS I C N A RETIREMENT TRUS I C M A RETIRE~NT TITUS IDENTICATOR CORPORATIOR IDENTICATOR CORPOIL4TIOR IDBfTICATOR CORPORATION II4PALA, PETER JERRY KELLETT PAINTING KINKO'S OF RIVERSIDE, I IOiORR POOL STSTENS, INC L & N FERTILIZER, INC. L & M FERTILIZER, INC. L & N FERTILIZER, INC. LAKE ELSIliOIE, CITY OF LO-FAT CYCLES LO-FAT CYCLES LO-FAT CYCLES LO-FAT CYCLES NEYERS, DAVID WILLIAM NONTEREY STSTENS, INC. IIX(TEREY STSTBIS, INC. NATIONAL FIE PROTECTIO NATIONAL FIRE IqIOTECYIO NATIONAL FIE PROTECY!O NEXTEL CG!4UIIICATIQNS, NIEDERECGR, ELISA OGILVIE, SHERRY (XX)Z59 OLSTEN STAFFING SEllVICE 001151 PACIFIC EQUIPMENT & IRR CITY OF TEMECULA VIXJCHERICHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION WT NDI4BER 000196 DEF C(XIP OD1-208) 000194. DEF CCIIP 100-2080 000194. DEF CONP 190-2080 00019/, DEF ODNP 191-208) OD0196 DEF CQIP 192-2080 00019/, DEF CCle 193-2060 00019& DEF CDI4P 280-2080 00019~ DEF CCI4P IDENTA-PRIIIT REPI.N3!NENT KIT 001-170-999-5220 FREIGHT 001-171)-,999-5220 TAX 001-170~.999-5220 REFIMD FOR TClD CLASS PAU314A PARK - SEAL CIXICRETE MISC COPY SUPPLIES NISC POOL SLIPPLIES FOR CRC NISC NAINT SUPPLIES 2 - TRIle4ERS M/SHIELD & STRING TAX NAYOR\COUNCIL CONF:STGNE-EENHO INSTALL LITESONPQLICE BIKE INSTALL LITES all POLICE BIKE LITES & REAR TIRE POLICE lIKE LITES & LEVERS all POLICE BIKE TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS MICROFIt. H, & APERTURE CARD TAX PUBLICATIall:NFPA13-1976; 95 PP MEIIER DISCOUNT FREIGHT DISPATCH RADIOS IIilLE SERVS RERJND FOR TCSD CLASS REFLII) Fall TClD CLASS TEMP RELP U/E 4/9 GRAGE OIL FILTERS FOR CITY VEHICLES 1gO-183-&982 190-182-999-5212 OD1-162-999-5222 190-182-999-5212 100-16~-601-5218 100-16~-601-5262 100-16~-601-5262 001-100-999-5258 001-170-999-5215 001-170-999-5215 001-170-999-5215 001-170-999-5215 190-183-999-S3X0 330-199-999-5ZTT 330-199-999-5Z7'7 O01 - 171-999-5228 001-171-999-5228 001-171-999-5228 320-199-999-5209 190-183-&ge2 190-183-6982 OD1-162-999-5118 190-180-999-521/, ITBI 1 ,~1 .&O 222.01 572.27 65.51 75.00 80.06. 63.34 22.50 530.00 6.88 25.58 ~8.00 650.00 21.91 281.86 69.69 885.~ 68.65 56.OD 37.71 37,71 61.36 61.97 67.5'0 4.75- 6.50 9~6.00 65.OO 65.OD 613.10 16.12 PACt 5 aT 2,612.09 362.~6 4~.OD 650 .OD 27.91 281.8~ 178.75 38&.OD 610.28 69.25 65.00 65.00 613.10 1&.12 VOUCHRE2 "'0~/~5 vuuCHER/ CHECK NI.IIER 23/~81 17:~5 CHECK DATE ~/~/95 ~/~/~ ~/~/~ ~/~/95 ~/~/~ ~/~/~ ~/~/95 ~/~/~ ~1~/~ ~/~/95 001~/95 00/0&/95 0510&/95 00/0&/95 0010~195 0010~/95 00/04./gS 00/0~/95 00/0&/95 05104,195 0510~/95 0010~/95 0510~/95 0010~/95 0010~/95 0010~/95 0510~.195 0010~195 0010&195 00/0~/95 00/O4./95 ~/~/95 00/0~/95 00/04/95 00/0~/95 00/0&/95 0010~/95 00/0~/95 05/04./95 00/0&/95 00/0~/95 MR 001561 001561 001561 001561 001561 001561 001561 001561 001561 0012/,3 00024.6 0002&6 0002/6 0002&6 00024,6 0002&6 0002&6 0002&6 0002.~ 0002&6 00024~ 00024,6 00024,6 00024~ 0002/.6 0002&6 0002&6 000246 00024,6 0002/.6 0002&6 0002/6 0002&6 0002&6 0002&6 000245 0002/,5 000~ 0002&5 0002&5 0002&5 0002~5 0002&5 000265 000245 VENtmR M PAGENET - PAGING NETMOB PAGENET - PAGING HETtdOR PAGENET - PAGING NGTVOR PAGENET - PAGING NGllGt PAGENET - PAGING HETI, IOR PAGENET - PAGING HET!dOR PAGENET - PAGING HETI40~ PAGENET - PAGING NETIdOR PAGENET - PAGING NETM3e PALMQUEST, NARY PERS (EHPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (ENPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (B4PLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (ERPLOYEES' RETIIE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS CENPLOYEES' HETIRE PERS (BIPLOYEES' RETIRE PEltS (BIPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EIFLOYEES' RETIRE PEltS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' NETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES~ lIETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EIFLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EIIPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (BFLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (ENPLOYEES' NETIRE PERS (BIPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS (EIFLOYEES' HETINE CITY OF TEMECULA VCtlCHERICHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIORS ITB4 DESORIPTIOR PAGING NONTiff gRVE FOR NAY 95 PAGING NONTiff HEItVS FOR NAY 95 PAGING NONTiff RM FOR NAY 95 PAGING NONTiff SENVS FOR NAY 95 PAGING NONTiff GERV$ FOR NAY 95 PAGING NONTiff NEM FOR NAY 95 PAGING NONTiff SERVS FOR NAY 95 PAGING NONTiff HERVS FOR NAY 95 PAGING MONTHY SERVS FOR NAY 95 TCS~ INSTRIJCTOR EAItNIN~S IX)02~ PER RIDE 000246 PaREOE 000Z46 FElt RIDE 000Z46 PEltS NET 0002~6 PEltS HET 00024.6 PERS RET 0002,16 PERS HET 0002/,6 PERS RE1' 0002/,6 PEltS RET 0002/,6 PER$ RET 00G2~ PERS RET 0002/,6 PERS HET 004~&6 PERS NET (X)02~ PERS RET 00024~ PERS NET 0002~ SUNVIVOR 0002/;6 SUGVIVOR 0002/;6 StJRVIVOR 0002&6 SURVIVOR 0002~6 SIJRVIVOR 0002&6 SURVIVOR 0002/;6 SURVIVOR 0002~ SURVIVOR 0002&6 SIMVZVOR OOQ2&6 SURVIVOR 04X)2~ SURVIVOR OQ02&6 SIJRVIVOR PERS (HF~J.TH IND. PIE PERS (HEALTH IN4MM. PRE PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE IXX)2&S PEltS (HEALTH INSUR. PIE 00024.5 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PIE 0002&5 PERS (HEALTH INIIJR. PRE 0002/,5 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PeE 0002&5 PERS (HEALTH INSUlt. P~E 0002&5 PERS (HEALTH INSUlt. PRE 0002&5 PERS (HEALTH IND. MtE 0002&5 PERS (HEALTH IND. PIE 0002/)5 NEFIJND FOR SAMDEE LITTRILL REFtlD FOR SJUI)EE LITTNELL AETNA SO BLSHIELD HELTHIIET HELTIINET HELTHEET NELTNNET HELTNIIET rJ~!IERSO ACC~T NUHBER 001-100-999-5250 001 - 16~-999-5250 100-16&-601-5ZS8 001-165-999-5238 001-120-999-5250 001-162-999-5Z38 001-170-999-524,2 190-180-999-5250 '320-199-999-5258 190'18~'.999'5:50 001-2130 190-2130 280-2130 001 -Z590 100-2500 16~-2390 190-2390 191-2390 192-2590 193-2390 320-2590 O01-2390 100-2390 165-2590 191-2590 001-161-999-5113 901-1170 O01-2090 O01-2090 001-2090 100-2090 190-2090 280-2090 001-2090 190-2090 ITEN ANOUNT 22.50 15,00 15.00 7.50 7.50 - 22.50. 30.00 75.00 19.95 )15.20 53.Q? 3.4.7 1.56 12,19"/'.67 2,310.21 76.,16 2,796.4.3 89.91 99.70 319./,5 239.71 37.4.2 208.21 301.05 10.22 13.4~ .4.2 .93 1.,~ .70 .Z3 .93 .93 2.00 226.30- 12.88 18.70 20.4.5 273.92 13.4.6 55.18 11.72 8.10 5.92 17.87' PAGE6 CHECK ANQLIT 214. 315.20 18,974..16 VOUCHRE2 vwCHER/ CHECK NUIIGER 17:65 CHECK DATE 05/0~/95 05/0~/95 oSlo~/~S o5/o~/~ IJIIBER 000265 000245 000265 000~5 000245 000~5 000245 000~5 000265 000265 000265 000265 000265 000265 000265 000265 000265 000265 000~5 000265 000~5 OO0265 000265 000265 000265 000265 000265 000~5 000~5 000~5 000265 000265 000245 000~5 000265 000265 000265 0O0265 000265 000~5 0002~ 000269 CITY OF TENECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PEaIOnS NAME DESCRIPTION PEnS (HEALTH INSUR. Pile 000265 PERS (HEALTH INSLIe. Pile ~265 Pets (HEALTH INSUR. PIE 0002/,5 PEnS (HEALTH IMSUR. PIlE 000265 PERS (HEALTH IND. PIE 000265 PERS (HEALTH IND. PRE 000265 PERS (HEALTH INSUn. lie O002&S PERS (HEALTH INSUR. Pile 000265 PER$ (HEALTH INSII. PRE 000265 PEnS (HEALTH INStit. PEE PEnS (EALTH INSUlt. I~E 0002/,5 PEnS (HEALTH IND. PEE PEnS (HEALTH INSUlt. PIE 000265 PEES (IF. ALTH INSUlt. Pile 000265 PEnS (HEALTH INSLIB. IRE 000265 PEnS (HEALTH IND. PRE 000265 lIES (HEALTH IND. PIE PEnS (HEALTH IllSLit. I~E 0(02/,5 tIns (HEALTH IND. Pile 000265 fiRS (HEALTH INSUR. PEE 000265 PEnS (HEALTH INSUR. Pile PEnS (HEALTH IND. Pile 000265 PEnS (HEALTH INgJR. PRE PEnS (IEALTH INSLI. PIlE 0002/,5 PEnS (HEALTH INStl. PEE 000265 PEnS (HEALTH INSUlt. PIE 000265 PERS (HEALTH INSUn. PEE 000265 fIRS (HEALTH ]NSUR. IRE PENS (HEALTH :nsuIt. Pile 000265 PEnS (HEALTH INSIJR. PRE 0002/,5 PERS (HEALTH IND. IRE 000265 PERS (HEALTH IND. PRE 000265 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. Pile 0002/,5 fIRS (HEALTH' IND. PRE 000265 PEnS (HEALTH IND. PEE lIES (HEALTH INSII. PRE lIRS (HEALTH IND. PnE 000265 PEnS (HEALTH INSUlt. PnE 000265 PEnS (HEALTH ]NSUn. PIE 000265 lInS (HEALTH INSUlt. Fg.E 000265 PERS (HEALTH lNIJn. PEE 0002/,5 PEltS (HEALTH INSUlt. PEE 000265 PERS (HEALTH INSLI. PEE 000265 PACIFICn PACIFIOR PC PEltS CHO PEltS REV TICARE TICARE TN~CAItE TICARE AETNASO AETEA SO ILSHIELD CIGNA CI611A CIGIM CIGNA HELTHIET HELTHNET HELTHIET HELTHNET HELTHNET HELTHNET HELTHIET HELTHNET KAISERSO KAZSEnSO PACIFICIt PAC|FICR PACIFZCR PACIFICIt PEnS ClIO lIES CHO lInS Clio PERS DED PERS TAKECARE TAKECARE TAKECARE TAG CARE PETCO ANINAL SUPPLIES, DOG F(X)O FOR TENECULA K-9 PETROLANE PETROLANE PETROLANE PrOPAlE FOR CiTY VEHTCLES'3622 FUEL FOR CiTY VEHICLES PROPANE FOR TCSD VEHICLES PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMB. ACCOUNT 100-2090. 001-2090 001-2090 100-2090 193-20gQ 300-2090 O01-2090 100-2090 190-2090 191-2090 193-2090 001-2090 100-2090 190-2090 3&0-2090 001-2090 100-2090 190-2090 192-2090 001-2090 001-2090 190-2090 001-2090 001-2090 001-2090 100-2090 165-2090 001-170-999-5327' 001 - 162-999-5263 001-162-999-5263 190-180-999-5263 ITEN 3.15 35.2.6 Z3.32 121.2,r, 63.Q5 720.51-.' 3~.10 15.16 9.97' 9.96 721 39.81 397.91 857.37 :38.27 6,156.4~, 1,208.17 1,368.25 175 .~ 237.07 159 .&8 606.55 806.76 612.12 513.20 61.36 1,0.32.38 3~4.73 1~0.7~ 512.76 1,606,~ 11.05 6.97 720.51 101.55 1,4~2.09 832.62 96.01 1~.13 9.61 )69.53 188.11 57.55 PAGE CHECK N4OLIT 19,782.80 13&.13 567.~5 VIXICHRE2 0~/95 VuUCHER/ CHECK NLI4BER 234.97 23500 23502 23502 23502 235O3 55O4 ,5505 235~ 23505 23506 23508 23508 23508 23509 23509 3510 3511 17:51 CHEC3: DATE 05/0~/95 05/0~/95 05/0~/95 05106195 05/06/95 05/06/95 05/06/95 05/06/95 0510~195 05/0~/95 0510~/95 0510~/95 0510~/05 0510~195 0510~195 O5/O4/95 05/04/~5 05/0~/95 05/0~/95 O5/O4/95 O5/O4/95 05/0~/95 05/0~/95 05106195 OO15OO OO1~65 00027'1 OO19~9 000376 OO05'57 OOQ53'I OO0537 OOQ537 QQQ537 OO0537 00~75 O00:575 000~75 000763 OO1567 OO15~,7 OOlS6? OOlS~7 OOlS6? OOl.r~7 OO15~7 0015/,7 OOO515 OO06/,2 VENDOR M RE!X4AYliE'TZTLEY, $TACI REGIONAL TRAINING CENTE RIVERSIDE CO. DEPT. OF RIVERSIDE CO. HABITAT R08ERT BEIN, 144 FROST & S K S, INC/INLAND OIL S K S, INC/INLAND OIL S K S, ]NC/INLAI) OIL S K S, INC/INLAND OIL S K S, INC/INLANDOIL S K S, INC/INLAND OIL SALVATION AIU4Y SQIJTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CAJ. IF EDISIXi - $8,,'THERN C, ALIF EDISON - SOUTHERN r.,ALIF EDISON - SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON - SIXITHERN CALIF EDISON - SCl. rrHERN CALIF EDISON - SOUTHERN CALIF ~LL=P!!ON SI/,ITHERN CALIF ~LEPIION SEUTHERN CAI. IF TELEPHON TAYLOR, BOB TEN4STERS LOCAL 911 TENISTERS LOCAL 911 TEN4STERS LOCAL 911 TENISTERS LOCAL 911 TEAMSTERS LDCAL 911 TENTERS LOCAL 911 TENTERS LOCAL 911 TMTERS LOCAL 911 TB~ECULA CYCLES TEIECULA CYCLES TEMECULA VALLEY CIIAMBER TERECULA, CITY OF ' FLE CITY OF TBIECULA VIXICHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL ff. RIIX)S ZTEtl DESCRIPTION REFUND FOR TCSI) ~ UKSHp:.A.S_~___RTIVE CI31hHI4PTN-IIO PORTABLE TOILETS RENTAL 8 YARD PRK SNACKBARS HEALTH PERNITS K-RAT IgqlT FOR 14ARCIf 05 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES FLEL FOR CITY VEHICLES FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES COHI4 CGNTR FOR OK BOll, VICTIm ELECT SERVS FOR SPT PRK II!PIKN 2-01-202-7330 ELECT SERVS 2-OO-397-5026 ELECT SERVS 2-OO-397-5062 ELECT SERVS 2-00-397-5059 ELECT SERV 2-OO-397-5OO7 ELECT SERVE 66-77'-58~-8087-02 ELECT SERVS 909-202-5153APRIL 95 909 202-6766 BB PVBLAZER 909 202-6760 JH CARPET CLEANING - CITY HALL 0015&7 UN DUES OO15~7 UN DUES 00154,7 UE D4JES OO15~7 UN DtJES OO1567 UN DUES 0015/,7 UN DUES OO15~7 UE DUES OO15~,7 UN DUES PQLICE CYCLES REPAIRS & NAINT. POLICE CYCLES REPAIRS & RAINT. SECURITY DEpOSiT REFUND RAIIrTAIN FLEX lINEFIT/05/06 NUIIER 190-183-6982 001-171-999-5261 lOO-166-601-5258 lOO-180-999-5;50 OO1-162-999-52&8 lOO-16~-601-5263 OO1-1&3-999-5263 OO1-165-999-52&3 001-110-999-5263 190-180-999-5263 001-162-999-5263 OO1-1990 210-190-137-580~ 192-180-999-5319 191-180-~;9-5319 ~)-199-999-5260 190-180-999-5260 195-180-999-52&0 3&O-199-999-S2&O 001 - 150-999-5208 100-16&-601-5208 lOO-166-60~5-5208 3~0-199-999-5230 001-2123 lOO-2123 190-2125 191-2123 193-2125 280-2125 300-2123 320-2123 OO1-170-9~;9-5216 OO1-170-999-5216 OOl-IOZO ITBI N4OUJlT 65 .OO lOO.OO 57,39 556,OO lOO,3~ 69,76 131,55 3,1OO.OO 308.20 21,079.69 3,716.15 2,331.80 2,78~.95 532.46 73.46 195.52 182.OO 86.28 678.51 86,96 160.60 8.33 28.67 11.10 18.50 67.67 276.18 lOO.OO 3,165.18 PAGE 9 772.57 3,1OO.OO 30,518.51 /,61,80 6R).OO , VOUCHRE2 *~,..~,/~ VuUCHER/ CHECK NLI4BER 23511 73511 23511 2:$512 'Z3513 23513 23513 2351A 23515 23515 23515 23515 23515 23515 23516 rS516 3516 ,7 z. s517 23517 23517 23517 23518 23518 23518 23518 23519 2352O 23521 23521 23521 23521 23521 23522 23522 23523 3524 17:51 CHECK DATE 05/~/95 0~10~1~ 0510~1~5 05/0U'95 05104,195 05104195 05 /0~195 0510~195 0510~195 05104,195 05/0~/V5 0510~1~5 051041f5 0510~195 05106195 0510~195 0510~195 oslo~/95 051l~195 0510~/95 0510~/95 05/0~/95 0510~/95 0510~195 051O6/95 0510~195 OO1O65 001065 OO1O65 O01O65 001065 OO1O65 000~26 OOO326 OOO326 000~26 001209 OO1928 001881 001881 001881 001881 001881 m9 M TENECULA, CITY OF - FLE TENECULA, CITY OF - FIE TENECULA, CITY OF - FLE T!IIIY D. PRQ)UCT!ONS TME CENTER STATIONERS TOIIE CENTER STATIONERS TOklE CENTER STATIONERS TRAVEL TRUST U $ C 14/PEBSCO (DEF. C U S C I1/KISCO (DEF. C U $ C 14/PEISCO (DEF. C U S C 14/PEBSCO (DEF. C U S C 14/PEBSCO (DEF. C U S C 14/PEBSCO (DEF. C U S C 14/PEBSCO (ONRA) U S C 14/PEBSCO (081tA) U S C 14/KBSCO (OBRA) ONZTED &lAY OF THE INLAN UNITED UAY OF THE IRLAN UNITED IMY OF TRE INLM UNITED RAY OF TIE IllLAN UNITED IMY OF TIE iNLAN UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE, UNITIX; RENTAL SERViCE, UNITOG RENTAL SERViCE, UNITOG RENTAL SERViCE, VAULT INC., THE VEVLE, ifiLLIM CONRAD UTTER RAFETY PRODUCTS, UTTER SAFETY PRaXJCTS, UTTER SAFETY UTTER SAFETY UTTER SAFETY PRIX)tJCTS, i/AXlE SANITARY SIJPPLY, IMXIE SMIITARY SUPPLY, MEST PUBLISN]NG COHPANT gtlITE CAP IIIXISTRIES, UNITE rAP INDUSTRIES, CITY OF TEHECULA VOUCHERICIEClC REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS DESCEIPTION EMPLOYEE CONTR!IJTION TO FLEX E!eLOYEE CONTItlBUI'ION TO FLEX E14PLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX ENTERTAIN:RAYOR & COIJNCIL CONF OFFICE SUPPLIES FON Pg OFFICE SIJPPLIES FON PU OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR Pg CONF:GFOA AIRFARE:G.ROBEDTS 001065 DEF ~ 001065 DEF ff 001065 DEF CClf 001065 DEF CClF 001065 DEF CCIF 001065 DEF CCI4P 000389 PT RETIR 000389 PT RETIR 000]89 PT RETIR UNIFOIU4 NAINTENANCE FOR TCSD HATS FOR CITY HALL CEC FLOOR NAYS UTTS FOR SENION CENTER NISC. APERTURE CARDS TAPES LOAN AGREElINT W/BLIND PIG UGI4ENS LIFEilARD TANK WLOGO LIFEItAID PRO SHORTS WLOGO UTTER SAFETY T-SHIRTS LIFEGUARD EI4BROIDERY FREIGHT BLDG NAINT SUPPLIES - ate BLDG RAINT. $1,,FPLIES - CEC CA CODES-PENAL 95 (POt. lCE DPT) E14ERG SUPPLIES:POLY SAND RAG5 TAX MR 190-1020 100-1020 300-1020 001-100-~-5230 100-16~-604-5220 100-16&-60~-5220 '100-16~-60~-5220 001-14.0'.~"5261 001 '208O 100'2080 1~0-2080 ~4,0'2080 001-2160 100-2160 190-2160 001-2120 100-2120 1~5-21Z0 190-2120 ZBO-21ED 1~-1~-999-5~3 34.C)-1~-999-5230 1~-1~-999-5~0 1~-181-999-5~0 ~0-199-999-5277 1520 1~0-182-~-5212 lfO-182jF~-5212 100-16&-601-5218 100-16~-601-5218 ITER -ANQUNT 551.5~ ~0.25 12.50 100.00 21.60 6.&1 2 370.00 2,192.18 132.23 23'1 .SO 512.S0 50.00 317.22 60.00 672.16 38.&6 IO.OA .75 17.00 .75 2O.85 ~r, .50 38.23 2O.O& 2,215.75 312.Q0 152.00 96.OO 11.08 55.29 162.43 12~.30 54O.OO &1.85 PAGE 10 3,7)9.67 100,00 7,0.5O :~0.00 8~9.38 87.00 113.02 205.38 2,215.75 M5.o8 217.72 129.30 VOUCHRE2 "'~/95 17:51 vuuCHER/ · CHECK: CHECk:: NUMBER DATE Z3525 05/0~/95 NUMBER I)QQ3~5 IX)Q34~? VENDOR M XEIIOR CORPOIIATIOR BILLI ZEE SERVICE CIXlPANY, IN Cl~ OF TBIE~ VQUCHB/C~ REGISTER FOR ~LPERZ~S ITBI DESCRIPTION NAY NQNTHY LEASE ON ~ COPI FIRST AID K:IT REFILlCITY HALL ACIXIUNT 330-1W-999-5~9 34,0-1~-999-5~2 ITBI AJ, IOUNT 2,986.12 PAGE 11 ,~,,~. CSEC[ AIIXJNT 2,986.12 &4~.O0 1~6,765.25 VOUCHRE2 *~ CITY OF TENECULA VOUCJet/CNK[ REGISTER FOR ALL PiRIODS PAGE FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 100 GAS TAX FUND 190 COleWNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP 300 INStP, ANC~ RM) 320 INFORNATION SYSTENS 330 ~UPPORT SERVICES 340 FACILITIES TOTAL 14,215.74 3,729.55 19,618.53 1,095.58 30.47 863.26 35.00 32,169.22 1,021.97 1,293.'54 461 VOUCHRE2 11/95 15:~. VUUCHER/ CHECK CHECK: ~ER DATE 23528 (:)5/(:)8/95 23529 05/OR/95 23533 05/11/95 2353~ 05/11/95 235:55 05/11 23535 05/11/95 235)6 05/11/95 23537 05/11/95 23538 05/11/95 23539 05/11/95 235/*0 05/11/95 001535 73.%0 05/11/95 001535 35~0 05/11/95 001535 35~.0 05/11/95 001535 235~,1 05/11 23.%2 05/11/95 235~.3 05/11/95 235~. 05/11/95 0004,78 23.5~ 05/11/95 0004,78 235/,5 05/11/95. 000165 235~6 05/11/95 001135 235/*7 05/11/95 000803 235~8 05/11/95 0006~ 235~8 05/11/95 000643 23549 05/11/95 0014,63 23550 05/11/95 000993 2355105/11/95 00018~ 2355105/11/95 00018/, ;55105/11/95 000184, ;552 05/11/95 001355 CITY OF TEHECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIGOS VENDOR VENDOR NUIBER M 0001.% C S n F 0 001522 LAKE ELS[NORE, CiTY OF 001895 A T & T ' VAN NUYS 0019/,7 AJ4ERIGAS 0001.% C S N F 0 00015/, C S 14 F 0 000129 CAL lEST RENTAL CENTER, 0009'~ CALIFORNIA DEPT OF TRAM 001195 CENTRAL SECURITY SERVIC 000/,89 COBB GROUP, THE CREEKSIDE TEXACO, INC. CREEKSIDE TEXACO, INC. CREEKSIDE TEXACO, INC. CREEKSIDE TEXACO, INC. 000155 DAVLIN 001673 DIVERSIFIED TEMPORARY S 001722 EDt/ARDS, SALLY FAST SIGNS FAST SIGNS FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. ITB! DESCRIPTIGN CONF:95 LEGISLATIVE GVKr/U HAYORS' & COUNCIL COlIF 7'505757992001 APRIL REPAIR OF B/S CHEVEY S-10 CAREER DEVELO COIN BIg/SO CAREER DEVELO COIN SE!4IIIM/SO PARK HAINTENANCE RENTAL EQUIP CALTRARS RETRIC NIGHUAY HAIIM. L SECURITY & FIRE NONITORING AT INSIDE PARADOX FOR DOS VEHICLE HAINT. - PUBLIC liNtKS VEHICLE HAlfiT. - PIJBLIC VOltKS VEH]CLE HAINT FOR MLIC t/ORKS VEHICLE HAlliT - PUBLIC t/ORKS HAY 1 PLANNING C014 flEETING TEMP HELP FOR RECEPTIONISTS PAY INSTR/STORYTIflE ADVENTURE LETTERING ON NEt/CITY VAN TAX EXPRESS MAIL' SERVICES FIRST CARE INDUSTRIAL N PRE-BIPLOYI4ENT SCREENING FLAGHOUSE, INC. FORTNER HARDMARE, INC. FURTNER HNU)kUkltE, INC. FOUNTAIN SUITES HOTEL FREEDCl4 COFFEE, INC. BINGO GAMES MISC. SUPPLIES FOR PUBLIC MORK NISC. SI. FPLIE$ FOR PM LOOGING/DRUG-ALCOHOL COlIF COFFEE SUPPLIES CITY HALL G T E..CALIFORNIA - PAYI4 909-69~-64,00 APRIL G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYI4 909-695-3539 APRIL G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYI4 909-699o2309APRIL G T E CALIFORNIA, INC. EO5&I)3,C,'~,,,-95118 MONTHLY ACCES ACCOUNT NUMBER 001 - 110-999-5258 001-100-999-5258 320-199-999-5208 001-162-999-521/* 001-1/,0-999-5258 081-1/,0-999-5258 190-180.;999-5Z58 108-16d~-60~-5228 190-182-999-5250 320-199-999-5228 100-1(34-601-521/* 108-16/,-601-521/, 108-164-601-521/* 001-163-999-521/* 001 - 161-999-5250 001-161-999-5118 190-18~-999-5:[50 190-180-999-52~4 190-180-999-52z~ 280-199-999-5Z50 001-150-999-52&8 190-180-999-5~01 100-164-601-5218 108-164-601-5218 001-170-999-5261 )60-199-999-5250 220-199-999-5208 320-199-999-5208 328-199-999-5206 320-199-999-5208 ITB ANOtJNT 65.00 56.~ 5.21 53.~ ~.50 22.50 ~.~ ~.~ 53.00 ~,~ 359.45 2~.05 150.~ 722.&0 1~.00 154.~ 11.~ 35.~ ~7.~ 205.17 56.~ 249.~ ~.61 28,61 350.~ PAGE I CliCK MOUNT 56.00 5.21 · 53.A6 150~J 722.4,O 1&4.00 262,10 2~9,98 87.98 528.55 3,~,,-~! VCUCHRE2 /**"-,~5 CITY OF TENECULA VOUCNER/CIIECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK MUNBER 23553 23553 23553 23553 2355~ 2355~ 2355~ 2355~ 23556 23556 23555 23556 23556 23557 23557 23557 ~557 23557 23558 23559 23560 23560 23560 23561 2356~ Z356Z 23563 2356G 23565 23566 S567 ~567 CHEC3~ DATE 05111195 05111195 051111f5 051111~5 05/111~5 05/11/95 05/11/95 05/11/95 05111195 05/11195 05/11/95 05111195 05/111f5 05/11/f5 05111195 05/111f5 05/11/95 05/11/95 05111/95 05/11/95 05/11/95 05/11/95 05/11/95 05/11/95 05/11/95 05/11/95 05111195 05/11/95 05/11/95 05111/f5 05/11195 05/11/95 05/11/95 05/11/f5 05/11/95 05/11/95 NUHBER 001937 001937 001937 001937 000177 000177 000177 000177 000177 000177 OOO388 OOO388 001351 001/,07 OO16O7 000205 OO1123 001123 M GALLS, INC. iLLS, INC. GALLS, INC. GALLS, INC. GLENHIES OFFICE PlffiDUET GLENHIES OFFICE PRCOL.;"I' GLENNIES OFFICE PRG)UCT GLEIIIES OFFICE PlffiDUCT GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT ODLLOGLY, CHARL11 GREATER ALARM COlIPAMY, GREATER ALAIM COleANY, IIMIKS NAIUXilIE, INC. IL~KS ILilW~IIE, INC. HAllKS IINE)MNE, INC. liA!IKS I¢~INIIIE, INC. HNIKS PSi, INC. HANKS IINIDMRRE, INC. HANKS IIAI)MtlE, INC. HNIKS HARDgRRE, INC. IINIKS NAIlMARE, INC. HEARR, DENISE HSIEH, LOUISA I C B O, INC. I C B O, INC. I C B O, INC. INLAND BIPIRE ECQN(X4IC INTER VALLEY POOL StFPL INTER VALLEYPOOL SUPPL INTERNATIONAL ASIOCIATI KIDS PARTIES, ETC. KINICO'S OF R!~RSI~, I KMORR POOr. SYSTENS, INC ~ INOI~TIt!AL IFPLIE KNOX ]II)USTRIAL SUPPLIE ITEN DESatlPTIOR COMLrr FLASH POMER SIJPPLY FREIGIff ~rRIIE LIGICTSrrltAFFIC ~ FREIGHT OFFlEE SUPPLIES-/RESOURCE OFFICE ~II~LIES/FIMNICf TC~D OFFICE SlJI~LIES FIlIAliCE OFFIn; SUPPLIES RRROMS LAIEL$ RETUIN RETURNS POCKET FILES TC~D REFUIID/TEDDY BENt$/MI,~IC ClECKB) HOTIOH DETECTOR REPLACE I¢OrtlOR IN CORPUTER TOOLS, BNJIPNBrr & 14AINTENANCE NAINT. IIJPPLIES; INTERIN FIRE SINITS PI~GING SUI~LIES TCSD NAINTEMANCE SUPPLIES NAINTENANC~ SUPPLIES-CITY HALL TCSI) NAINTENANCE SUPPLIES SPQRTSPROGU/4S SUPPLIES TCSD HAINTENANCE SUPPLIES NAINTENANCE SUPPLIES'CITY HALL TC~D REFtlD/TEDDY BEARS/ItlSIC HSIEHrrCSI) CLASS REFUND 19c~ B & S PUBLICATIORS FREIGHT TAX SPONSOIt TF.N~ CA LEGISL. DAY NISC POOr. IUPPLIES OPEN ONLY RECVD 1&5 GAL OF ACID DRUGSIALCONOL & !!4PAIRED DItVG CLOMN FOR EARTH DAY COPY CENTER VARIOUS SUPPLIES NISC POOL ~IPPLIES FOR ORC NlSC. NAIIITEMAIIEE ~FPLIES TAX ACCOUMT MUmER 001-170-999-5216 001 - 170-999-521/. 001-1/0-999-5216 001-170-999-5214, 001-150-999-5220 001 - 160-~-5ZZ0 190-180-999-5220 001-1&0-999-5220 001-1&0-999-5220 001-1&0~999-5220 190-183-6982 )&0-199-999-5250 )&0o199-999-5230 001-171-999-52&2 001 - 171-999-5&70 190-183-999-5380 190-180-999-5212 )/,0-199-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 190-183-999-5)80 190-180-999-5212 )~0-199-999-5212 190-183-&982 190-183-&982 001 - 162-999-5228 001-162-999-5228 001-162-999-5228 001-110-999-5238 190-182-999-5212 190-182-999-5212 001-170-999-5261 190-18~-999-5~20 )30-199-999-5220 190-182-999-5212 lO0-16&-A01-5218 100-1(~-601-5218 ITBI AletMT lf9.99 7.39 169.98 5.56 23.58 5.38 9.:5~- 15.97- )S .00 150,.00 61.83 11.39 )96.87 177.67 67.11 35.00 35.00 .01 61.06 100.OD 316./~ 69.93- 1SO.OD 50.OD 93.81 &55,18 35 CHECK N4OUNT 362.92 302.65 35.00 901 8&9.07 100.OD 150 .OD ~.81 &90 .&6 VOUCHRE2 11/95 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 23568 23570 23570 23571 23572 23573 23573 23574 23575 235?6 235?6 S5TT S577 J577 23577 23577 2357"/ 23577 23577' 23577 23577 23577 Z3577 23578 2357~ 23579 23580 23581 23581 23582 2358?. 2358?. 2358?. 3582 ~583 15:A4 CHECK DATE 05/11/95 05111195 05/11/95 05/11/95 05/11/95 05111195 05111195 05111195 05/11/95 05/11/95 05111195 05111195 05/11195 05/11/95 05/11/95 05111/95 05/11/95 05/11/95 05/11/95 05/11/95 05/11/95 05/11/95 05/11/95 05/11/95 05/11/95 05/11/95 05/11/95 05/11/95 05/11/95 05/11/95 05/11/95 05/11/95 05111195 05111195 05111/95 05/11/~5 OO1329 001957 000~14 0O0653 00021~ 00021~ 000216 000217 000219 000219 0O0239 OOO253 M LAN LAB SAFETY SUPPLY, INC. LAB SAFETY SUPPLY, INC. LONGS DRUG STORE LUCKY STORE, INC. LUNCH & STUFF CATERING LUNCH & STUFF CATERING NAGIC KINI)OI4 CLUB NB4B NARGARITA OFFICIALS ASS HARTIN 1-HOUR PHOTO HARTIN 1-HaJR PHOTO HINUTEI4AN PRESS HINUTEMAN PRESS MINUTEMAN PRESS NINUTB4AN PRESS !41NUTEI4AN PRESS NINUTENAN PRESS MINUTEIUI PRESS MINUTEMAN PRESS MINUTEMAN PRESS HINU'rEHAN PRESS MIINTB4NI PRESS MINUTENAN PRESS NELSON, RICHARD NEg CON4UNITY LUTHERHI NEUCQlelMITY LUTHERAN OLSTEN STAFFING SERVICE PHOTO bKXtKS PHOTO VORKS PLANNING CENTER, INC., PLANNING CENTER, INC., PLANNING CENTER, INC., PLANNING CENTER, INC., PLANNING CENTER, INC., POSTIqASTER CITY OF TENECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERICOS ITE!4 DESCEIPTZOR PAY INSTRIOROUP GOLF LEiif. ilS I!liE SUBSCRIPTIUN; I.S. SAFETY EQUIP FOR MAINT CItEMS TAX F II.14 PURCHASE AND DEVELOPNENT. SUPPLIES/COOKIE 14OMSTER CLASS CITY CQUNCIL HEETINGS SENIOR CITIZEN LLMCIES RENEIdN. ICHAPTERIK) O82N4 APRIL ADULT VOLLEYBALL REFEREE PHOTO DEVELOPING FOR NAINT. PHOTO DEVELOP FOR P.M. SO0 BUS CARDS/JIN FAULIPV TAX 500 BUS CARDS/IRENE ROGENG TAX 5Q0 BUSINESS CARDS/SAIL ZZGLER TAX 500 BUSINESS CARDS/I'CSD TAX 500 BUS CARDS/Z. IIZTH/CASHIER 500 BUS CARDS/NO M TAX TAX HALF OF BRIDGE CLASS CANCELLED R(X]H REFUND/NEV CON4 LUTHERNI ROOH REFUND/NEU CON4 LUTNERNI VICL'Y GRAGE/T~Y SERVICES FIIJ4/DEVELOPING FII.14 AND FZLN DEVELOPING GENERAL PLAN SERVICES GENERAL PLAN SERVICES GENERAL PLAN SERVICES CONCLU$1OR OF GENERAL PLAN CONCLUSIOR OF GENERAL PLAN EXPRESS RAIL/APRIL ACCOUNT NtNBER 190-183-999-5330 ~20-199-999-5228 100-164-681-5218 lOO- 16z,-681-5218 190-180-999-5301 190-18~-999-57;0 ool -100.~999-52N) 190-180-999-5260 001-150-999-5226 190-183-999-5380 100-16~-601-5250 001-163-999-5Z50 001 -le3-999-5222 001 - 16~-999-5222 190-180-999-5222 190-180-999-5ZZ2 190-180-999-5222 190-180-999-5222 190-180-999-5222 190-180-999-5222 001-140-999-5ZZ2 001-120-999-5222 001 - 140-999-5222 001-120-999-57.27. 100-183-&982 190-183-4990 100-2900 001-162-999-5118 001-161-999-5Z24 1~-1~-999-5~1 001-161-999-52&8 001-161-999-52&8 ool - 161-999-5248 ool - 161-999-52&8 001-161-999-52&8 001 - 161-999-5230 ITEN MOUNT 224,00 22..97 156.68 8.52 37.97 40.00 80.00 130.Q0 135.00 316.80 145.22 8.8~ 100.00 5.00 652.59 10.73 10.73 5,0Z7.11 207.0S 1,5UB.88 453.30 230.00 PAGE 165.12 37.97 40.00 210.00 1~5.00 316.8Q 15&.06 105.00 452.59 VOUCHRE2 /,-u,/95 Vt,UCHER/ CHEC~ le, J~ER 23583 23583 2358~ 23585 2358~ 23585 23586 23586 23586 23586 23586 23586 23586 23587 23588 Z5589 23590 23591 23592 23592 23592 23592 23592 23592 23592 23592 23592 23593 23593 23593 23593 23593 23593 23594 3595 15:/,/, CHECK DATE 05111195 05111/95 05/11/95 05/11/95 05/11/95 05/11/95 05/11/95 05/11/95 05/11/95 05/11/95 05/11/95 05/11195 95/11/95 05/11/95 05/11/95 05/11/95 05/11/95 95/11/95 05/11/95 05/11/95 05111195 05/11/95 05/11/95 05/11/95. 05/11/95 05/11/95 05/11/95 05/11/95 05/11/95 05/11/95 05/11/95 05/11/95 05/11/95 05/11/95 05/11/95 05/11/95 05/11/95 05111/95 VEIl)OR IMIER O00ZS3 O00ZS3 O00262 000262 000262 000262 000262 000262 000262 0010/6 OO0266 000266 O00266 000266 000352 0O0958 000519 O00519 M POSTNASTER POSTNASTER POUELL, BAERBEL ~E~'E~B~I~a314PM ~E~'ENTER~I~a314PI ~E~'ENTER~I~Ca4PGN RANClIO CALIFOItNIA HATER RANCliO CALIFORNIA bIATER ILANCHO CALIFORNIA btATER P, ANCHO CALI FGNNIA UATER RANClIO CALIFGNNIA iNTER RANCliO CALZFGNNIA HATER RANClIO CAt. IF(XtNIA HATER RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SI, JPPL RIGHTIMY RIGHTUAY RIGHTHAY RIGHTtMY RIVERSIDE CO. ASSESSOR ROBERT CARAN PRCOU~IGN S C SINN(A: KING, ST S C SIGNS AKA: KING, ST S C SIGNS AKA: KING, ST S C SIGNS AKA: KING, ST S C SIGNS AKA: KING, ST S C SIGNS AKA: KING, ST S C SIGNS AKA: KING, ST S C SIGNS AKA: KING, ST S C SIGNS AKA: KING, ST S K S, INC/INI. AND OIL S K S, INC/INLAI) OIL S K S, INCIINLAND OIL S K S, INC/INLAMD OIL S K S, INC/INLAND OIL S K S, INC/INLJUID OIL SHNai SCOTT POOL & SPA SOUTH COLMTY PEST ~3NTR SOUTH COUNTY PEST CGITR CITY OF TB4ECULA V~ICHER/CNECK REGISTER FOIl ALL PERICOS ITEX DESCRIPTIGN EXPIESS IlL/APRIL EXPRESSilL/APRIL TCSD REFUND/I'EDOY IEARS/MIJSIC ADS/TI3D SEASaIL POSITIGNS MR RECRUITMENT ADS RONMMY tJR)ATES/CIP 03116-04/18 HATER CHARGES 03/16-04/18 HATER CHARGES 03/16-Q~/18 HATER CHARGES 03/16-04/18 HATER CHARGES 0~/16-0&/18 HATER ClMRGES 03/16-0&/18 HATER CHA~GES 010684300-1 PUBLIC MIlS HATER KMST SUPPLIES FGN CITY HALL APRIL 95 lIR LEGAL SERVICES PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL KITABLE TOILET RENTAL PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL IMP COPIES FOR TCSD 4TH OF JULY FIREgalUCS Pi_&NNING SIGNS DECENBER 199& PLANNING SIGNS FEBRUARY 1995 PROPERTY- SIGN POSTING/FEB 95 PLANNING SIGNS JNIUARY 1995 CITY CLK SIGNS JAIJARY 1995 PLANNING SIGNS NOVBIER 1995 CITY CLK SIGNS NOVEMBER 1995 PLANNING SIGNS OCT 199& CiTY CLK SIGNS OCTOGER 199& FUEL CHARGES FUEL CHARGES FUEL CHARGES FUEL CEARGES FUEL CHARGES FUEL CHARGES POOL HAINTENANC~ SERVICES PEST CONTROL SERVICES FOR PEST CONTROL SERVICES FOR CRC /R 001 - 120-999-5230 001-110-999-5230 190-183-4982 190-180-999-525~. 001 - 150-999-52S4~ 001 - 165-999-525~. 190-180-999-52&0 190-181-999-52&0 190-182;'999-5240 191-180-999-52&0 193-180-999-524,0 34,0'199-999-524,0 100-16~-601-5240 3&0-199-999-5212 001 - 130-999-5247 190-180-999-5Z38 190-180-999-5Z58 19O-180-999-5Z58 190-180-999-5238 190-180-999-5ZZ0 190-18~-999-5370 001-161-999-5256 001-161-999-5236 001-120-999-52&& 001-16t-999-5256 001-1;0-999-524~ 001-161-999-5256 001-120-999-52~r~ 001-161-999-5ZS6 001 - 120-999-524~ 100-16&-601-526~ 001-163-999-5263 001-165-999-5Zt3 001-110-999-52d3 190-180-999-52~ 001 - 162-999-5Z63 190-180-999-5212 190-181-999-5250 190-182-999-5250 ITB4 N4OIMT 28.00 21.50 35.00 3~9.14 - 103.52 120.60 1,660.80 97.45 72?..65 119.86 813.01 10.9/,, 13.4,3 59.12 52.50 62.89 lZ5.78 62.89 231.55 6~.50 206.S0 42.00 29.00 PAGE CHECK 92.S0 35.00 575.26 3,438.1/, S9.12 52.50 503.11 64.50 9,000.O0 775.37' 2O6.50 71 .IX) VOUCHRE2 11/95 VuJCHER/ CHECK NUNBER Z3596 2:3596 23596 23596 23596 23596 2:359? Z3597 25598 23599 23599 236(X) 23601 Z3601 ~602 Z3607 Z3610 23611 Z3611 23612 Z3613 S613 15:~4 CHECk: DATE 05111195 05111/95 05111/95 05111/95 05111195 05111/95 05111195 05111195 05/11/95 05111195 05/11/95 05/11/95 05/11/95 05/11/95 05/11/95 05/11/95 05/11/95 05 / 11/95 05/11/'95 05111195 05/11/95 05/11/95 05/11/95 05/11/95 05/11/95 05/11/95 05/11/95 05/11/95 05/11/95 05/11/95 05/11/95 05/11/95 VENDOR NtNBER 000537 00053/ 00053/ 000537 00053/ 00053/ 000926 000926 000375 000299 000299 000/,65 000574 000574 000168 000905 000306 000320 001179 001179 001881 001881 000~5 000345 001918 001918 VEI)OI~ M EDUTHERId CAt. IF ED!ION - SOUTHElla CALIF ED!Ill - SOUTHERN CAt. IF EDISON - SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON - SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON - SOUTHEll CALIF EDISON - SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON - SOtJ'rHBIN CAt. IF EDIil - ~OUTIERN CALIF TELEPHOII ITRACNOTA II1~ A~E ETRACHOTA filIAlill All ETRADLEY, MARY ICATHLEEN SUPERTONER SUPERTIER TEH~(::ULA FLOUER CORRAL TEHECULA IHUTTLE SERVIC TB!CULA VN.LEY PIPE & TIE INTER STATIONERS TRAOE I C(X!!RCE AHENCY THEBOR (XaMPANY INC., TH TREBOR COMPLY INC., TH UNITO~ RENTAL HERVII, UNITQG RENTAL SERVICE, lITON RENTAL SERVICE, WATER MFETY PE00UCT$, WATER $AFETY PE(XXJCTI, WZLCI(, EUk!HE XBtQK lITION IlLLI SEre31 CORPORATION BILLI XERON-COPIER EDURCE ZUMAR III)UETR1Ei, INC. ZUI4AR INDUSTRIES, INC. CITY OF TBIECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERILS ITEN DES13tIPTION APRIL IllVICE ~ A APRIL IllVICE lidEL l 01/05-05102 TCI) IIVICEI APRIL CEC SERVIilS APIilL SERVICE LEVEL A SflVICES APRIL SEItVICE LEVEL C ~RVICES 03/22-Q4/~2 I CENTER SERVICES 527R191025 OZ/OB-051QZ 909-312-0474 TH APRIL ItTRA IM!ICIAL POLICY AfTNA/CIAL POLICY BELLY DIll EXERCISE CLA~ TONER FOR lIP LASER JET l TAX ~DRIL FLGIRS/SUNSHINE FtMD TRANSPORTATION; CONFESENCE TCl) IMIET. All REPAIR OF PARK OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR LAND DEVEL LUNCHEON/TENI CALIF/NJ!~ RENTAL OF FLASHING BEACONS TAX IN MA!!iT IN MAINT CEEWS UIIIFilNi 051051 IIF0111 IMIITBIAICE FOR LIFEGUARD BillOil L__O~__ FREIGIrr · TCI) HEFIII/I!IGHT ERAIN MT Ffi - AMtlL RAIlEl CHNIIf APRIL XflII LEASf OF COPIER STENCILS FOR TAX NUIIER 191-180-999-5319 192-180-999-5319 190-180-999-524,0 190-182-999-5240 191-180-999-5319 193-180-999-57.~0 1VO-181-999-5244) · 190-180-999-5240 320-199..,999-5208 300-199-999-520& 300-1M5 190-183-999-5~0 001-1/0-999-5220 001-1/0-999-5220 001-21/0 001-100-999-5258 190-180-999-5212 001-163-999-5220 00 1 - 110-999- 5258 100-164-601-5238 100-1t4-601-5Z38 100-16&-(d)l-5243 100-164-601-5243 190-180-999-52~ 190-180-999-52/:3 190-180-999-5243 190-11-4982 530-199-999-5217 ~0-199-V99-SZ~9 190-182-999-5239 100-16&-e01-5218 100-16~-601-5218 ITEN 927.83 30.47 1,235.55 59.68 47.89 50.25 10,/Z3,22 21,&&6,00 45.00 3.49 107.21 50.00 16.16 14.47 23.50 23.50 10.85 52.50 1,21&.10 117.8~ PAGE 5 2,351.67 1,839.48 &6.24 107.21 16. a6 14.47 660.00 1,2M.tO 117.8& V'OUCHIIE2 16:28 CITY OF TFJ, ICtJLA VOUCHER/CHIC:X: REGISTER FOIl ALL PERILS FUND TIT~I: 001 GENERAL RJIID 100 P,,AS TAX FUll 190 ClIIIIITY SERVICES DISTRICT 210 CAPITAL II, I'ROVEHIIIT PlOJ Fill 280 REDEVELOPIIEIIT AGENCY - tip 390 TClO DEBT $ERVICE ,. TOTAL 13,378.58 20,95'7.16 1Z,5'S6.gO 106,2&9.35 31~/,82~J~3 3,6&1.05 VOUCHRE2 1195 16:28 VIIUCHER/ CHECX: CHECK VEIlDOll NUIIER DATE NUI4BER Z$617 05/23/95 Z5618 05/23/95 2:5619 05/Z5/95 23619 05/23/95 23620 05/23/95 0016~ 23620 05/23/95 001693 23623 05/23/9S 001956 ~626 05/Z5/95 001501 S27 05/23/9S 000431' 23629 05/23/95 001007 Z5629 05/23/9S 001001' 2363O 05,'23,'95 Z~630 05/23/95 23631 05/23/95 001713 23631 05/23/95 '001713 23631 05/23,'95 001713 23631 05/23/95 001713 05/23/95 001585 05/23/95 001585 37 05/Z5/95 ;8 05/23/95 05/23/95 CITY OF TEIECULA VCUCNER/CNECK REGISTER F011 ALL PERIDDS VENDOR ZTEI4 ACC0UliT M DESCIIPTION litleER 0O1538 ALBRET m & ASSOCIA PROGRESS IN4T-TRFFC SIGNAL PALA 21Q-16S-6&5-58~ 000102 NIRICAN ~ CO. OF C OO1072 FENC~ (IAI33TDP) REPAIR - S.P. M OF N4ERICA NT & NA SENI-ANNUAL IMIST/IQIIS ~ OF NIRICA lIT & SA I!!II-AMNAL NAIST/"'BmlIS EBNOImSQN CQIiSqlmCl'iON EBlelIDS~N I:~NSTRUCTION EBGIL CONPOIIATIaN HDLCIXRBI&COliE, INC KRDC, INC. LEIGHTON & A555~IATES, 14ARGARITA OFFICIALS ASS MAltIliA CGI/TRACTCIIS, IMC NOP. ELAND & ASSOCIATES IIMRIETA D~NT CO NPGCQIIP. NPGC:~P. NATIONAL SANITARY SUPPL NATIONAL NITMY SUPPL NalIRIS'REPIZ, INC. NORRIS'REPK~, INC. NDIRItISoREPIZ, INC. NORRIS'REPlY, INC. PAUL GHIDIIER CDIUKIATIO PAUL GHU)IIER CBIIPOIAT!O NAY ONAGE AND RII/IRIIDE IX). AUDIlIR RiI~R$IDE C:Q. AUDITat RIVERSIDE CO. INEIIIFF'I 001097 ROADLINE PtalXJCT$, INC. 001097 ROADLINE PRODUCTS, !liC. 001682 ROlElIT ICANN, JOHN KAIN 001682 :ROIEItT IOUI, JONN rAIN 000539 b/!I!4ER YARADA A~,~j~!ATE APR 05 PI!OGRESS-MIMCNESTER RETENTION WH INV 758-3-05 FEB 95 PLAN C!EI:~ SEII1/S CI~ Ir~!T/9&-95 IqlOP TAX REINB IOTMICAL NAIl 95 S!XVS-PALA ID-RIGT TIJIN APRIL IT SI.DMPITI:H IMPIRES RELEASE STOP P!4T FOR RONEBTSON AUDIT/STATE/LOCAL TRANS PROGH FGI4 ~ POUR PALA lID CNAHNF. L ~ & REPLACE ASPHALT CRC & RE.CTR. FLOCI SCilLIER TRX JNI 95 EBG sBr4-1ST ST DEZDGE FEB 95 EBG SERVS-1ST ST IRZDGE FEB 95 Ear- SERVS-IST ST BRIDGE CIVIL EBGINEBRING SERVICES FOR APR P~SS I~-TRAF SIGS~N baufflON WH IMV 94~1)*) PLAM CX SERVIC~S/FES 1998 ARt 95 PP~IM6 CITATION APt 95 PPXIM6 CITATION ASRSI4 NISC PARTS far Pd SI'EMCXL TRUC TAX COMSULTING SSV/OLD TOidN/?JgS C~MSULTIMG SBtV/OLD TOMM/2/gS APltlL SEItVIC~S/PALA 190-180-999-5212 390-199-999-5227 210-165-64~1-580~ 210-2035 001-162-.999-5248 210-1(~-~52-5802 190-165-999-5380 210-2038 001-1280 100-16&-601-S&01 100-164,-601-S~2 100-164-601 190-180-999-5610 190-180-999-5610 280-199-807-5802 280-199-807-5802 280-199-807-5892 280-199-807-5802 210-165-64~-580& 210-20~ 001-162-999-5248 001-2260 001 100-16&-601-5218 100-16&.,601-5218 280-199-999-52&8 280-1270 210-190-120-5802 TOTAL ITB4 N4elMT 1,675.00 ,r,,739.00 8S9.22 2,781.83 67,993.00 6,799.30- 4,6~2.86 2/,00.05 8,900.00 1,956.50 1,051.01 1,700.00 1,222.00 5,&18.00 6,016.Z5 12,368.50 3,939,25 &2,134,.60 1,031.92 1,055.00 950,0Q 1,638.80 1,018.25 78.91 2,395.25 2,3~5.25 2,&72.00 PAGE 1 1,675.00 3,6&1.05 61,193 .?0 ' 8,900.00 1,916.50 1,980.00 1,051.01 1,1'~ 1 1 ,(81.92 2,QaS,00 1,638.80 1,097.16 2,472.80 ITEM 4 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT APPROV~ CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICE CITY MANAGER City Council/City Manager Anthony Elmo, Chief Building Official,,~ May 23, 1995 Public Nuisance Abatement- 30301 Nicolas Road RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council set the date of a public hearing for June 13, 1995, at 7:00 p.m. at 30875 Rancho Vista Road, for the purpose of confirming the cost to the City for the abatement of a public nuisance at 30301 Nicolas Road. DISCUSSION: On April 25, 1995, the City Council held a public hearing to confirm the costs to the City of the abatement of a public nuisance at 30301 Nicolas Road. It has come to our attention that the property's owners were not properly notified of that public hearing date. Therefore, to assure that all property owners are given the opportunity to address this issue before the City Council, it will be necessary to rehear public testimony regarding this matter. The purpose of the public hearing is to confirm the cost of abatement of this property by the City and to cause the recording of a special assessment against the property in the total amount of $68,856.75. A breakdown of costs which make up this total amount: Environmental Control Systems, Inc. Attorney's fees Administrative costs Staff costs $58,600.00 8,297.64 525.00 $1.434.11 Grand Total e68,856.75 V:~AGENDA.REP,.~s__I .HNG ITEM 5 APPROVAL ~ CITY ATTORNE FINANCE OFFIC CITY MANAGE CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works\City Engineer May 23, 1995 Solicitation of Construction Bids for Access Ramps Project - PW95-04 PREPARED BY: ~ Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects Scott Harvey, Associate Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the plans and specifications and authorize the Department .0f Public Works to solicit public construction bids for Access Ramps - Project PW95-04. BACKGROUND: The plans, specifications and contract documents have been completed and the project is ready to be advertised for construction bids. This project will modify 23 concrete handicap access ramps at various locations throughout the City to comply with the most recent Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. The engineer's estimate for the project is $27,000. This project is being funded by the Federal Government with Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds which are administered by the Riverside County Economic Development Agency (EDA). The EDA has reviewed and approved the bid documents for advertisement. In addition to the City's standard advertising process, the Federal Government requires the City to fulfill the minority and women business enterprise participation. To meet this requirement the City will send a Notice Inviting Bids to minority publications, business information centers and local minority newspapers. FISCAL IMPACT: This project will be funded by Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds. ITEM 6 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer May 23, 1995 Contract Change Order No. 4 for Winchester Road Interim Street Improvements, Project PW94-03 PREPARED BY: Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects Scott Harvey, Associate Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: Approve Contract Change Order No. 4 for Winchester Road Interim Street Improvements, Project PW94-03 for Additional Aggregate Base - Class 2 in the amount of $27,660.00. e Approve a budget transfer in the amount of $24,537.64 from the Pavement Management Project and appropriate in the Winchester Road Interim Street Improvements Project. BACKGROUND: During the grading operation of the Winchester Road Interim Street Improvements, Project PW94-03 the contractor found that the quantities for the aggregate base and sub-base were more than the original contract bid items. The contractor will eliminate the Class 3 base bid item which was used to match the existing Caltrans designed road section and increase the Class 2 base bid item. The contractor will also reduce the unit price of the Class 2 base from $100/ton to $23.5/ton as a result of the estimated increase in quantities. This brings the total aggregate material price to $34,075, which is $27,660 more than the original bid amounts. The balance of project's contingency is $3,122.36, therefore a budget transfer in an amount of $24,537.64will be required from the Pavement Management Project. FISCAL IMPACT: On November 29, 1994, the City Council awarded a contract for the construction of Winchester Road Interim Street Improvements, Project No. PW94-03 to Chance Edmondson in the of $256,407.57. Contract Change Order No.'s 01 through 3 were approved by the City Manager for a total amount of $22,518.40. Contract Change Order No. 4 is in the amount of $27,660.00, of which $24,537.64 is over the 10% contingency. A budget transfer in an amount of $24,537.64 will be required from the Pavement Management Project (account pwO4~egdf!~95%O523%pw94..03 .er, o 061195 number 210-165-655-5804)to the Winchester Road Interim Street Improvements Project (account number 210-165-641-5804). Both projects are Capital Improvement Projects to be funded by Measure "A". Savings have been identified in the Pavement Management Project. Attachments: Contract Change Order No. 4 pwO4~,egdrpt%95%O523%pw94-03 .oco 051195 City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive · Ternecula, California 92590 (909) 694-1989 o FAX (909) 694-1999 CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 4 CONTRACT NO. PW94-03 PROJECT: Winchester Road Interim Street Imorovement SHEET 1__ of 1__ TO CONTRACTOR: Chance Edmondson NOTE: This chance order is not effective until aDoroved bv the Enoineer. CHANGE REQUESTED BY: Project Inspector A. EXTRA WORK {l~ FORCE ACCOUNT (TIME AND MATERIALS): 1. Additional Agoreoate Base - Class 9. During the construction the contractor found that the actual baso matedHal quantities were more than the original contract bid hems. The contractor will eliminate the Clam 3 base bid item and increase the Class 2 base bid item by the same thickness of the Class 3 base. Also, the contractor will reduced the unit price of the Class 2 base from $1 001ton to $23.51ton. This will bring the total estimate quantity of aggregate matedHal to 1,450 tons at a cost of $34,075, which is $27,660 more than the original bid amounts. AMOUNT TOTAL ...................................... $27,660.00 Original Contract Amount ................................... $ 256,407.57 Adjusted Contract Amount .................................. $ 278,925.97 Change Order No. 4( + ) .................................... + $ 27,660.00 Total Contract Amounl~ ..................................... $ 306,585.97 Adjustment of Working Days ................................. Approvad: Principal Engr. By: ' We the undersigned contractor have given careful co proposed and hereby agree. If t~/proposd il epproved, that we will provide ell equipment, furnish cil meTariciLsid'eree exee;;~sto~be noted above, end perform dl eewioee necessary for the work above specified, and will accept es full payment therefore the prices shown above. Date Accepted: cJ-I"~-'~<J' Contractor: ~_..~>t-~Qir--~%--~--~ (company's name) (signature) Title: Name :'~,,%~ (print) if the contractor does not sign acceptance of thie order, his mention is directed to the requirements of the specifications ee to proceeding with the ordered work and filing a written protect within the time therein specified. ~)Printed on Recycled Pai:)er. ITEM 7 APPROVAl R~ CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFIC CITY MANAGE CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works\City Engineer May 23, 1995 Solicitation of Construction Bids for Sidewalk Improvements on Rancho. Vista Road and Mira Loma Drive - Project PW94-19 PREPARED BY: Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects Scott Harvey, Associate Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the construction plans and specification and authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit public construction bids for sidewalk improvements on Rancho Vista Road and Mira Loma Drive - Project PW94-19. BACKGROUND: Each fiscal year the State Public Utilities Code (Senate Bill 821) sets aside 2% of the Local Transportation Funds in the County of Riverside to fund facilities for the exclusive use of pedestrians and bicyclists. The City of Temecula was one of sixteen proposals that the Riverside County Transportation Commission approved for funding. The plans, specifications and contract documents have been completed and the project is ready to be advertised for construction bids. This project will provide continuous sidewalk around Vail Elementary School, the Mira Loma/Rancho Vista loop (see Exhibit "A") and sidewalk on the south side of Rancho Vista Road at the east end of Temecula Valley High School (see Exhibit "B"). SB 821 Funds for FY 1994-95 will provide $27,680 (80% of the total cost) towards the project's estimated cost of $34,600. FISCAL IMPACT: The project will receive $27,680 in SB 821 funds which are administrated by the Riverside County Transportation Commission with the balance of the construction in the amount of $6,920 to be funded through Development Impact Fees. puSST N.T.S. RD :OLINAS PL C PROJECT LIMITS DEL CAM' RD. CITY OF TEMEGULA TI,~I~A VISTA PROPOSED SB 821 SIDEWALK PROJECT F'Y 1994-95 MIRA LOMA DR.- LOOP EXHIBIT · A ' DATE: May 9.1995 RANCHO CALIFORNIA 2 CLE RIO VISTA c~-~F.- 1 CALLE BAHIA VISTA ARROYO ALAMAR,,) /2 RTE' TUNA CORTE /x~OR ~ SA DR TE ~PROJECT LIMITS TEMECULA HIGH SCHOOL N.T.S. SPORTS PARK PAUBA CITY OF TEMECULA PROPOSED SB 821 SIDEWALK PROJECT FY 1994-95 RANOHO VISTA RD. DATE: Moy 9,1995 EXHIBIT 'B' PROCLAMATIONS/ PRESENTATIONS C rtifwate o f Apl, reeiation citizens deeply appreciate their high level of commitment to making their community a better place to five. IN ~S WUJ~EOF, I have hereunto atExed my hand and official seal this 23rd day of May, 1995 Jeffrey E. Stone Mayor June S. Greek, CIVIC c~ty C~erk City of Temecula Certificate of Appreciation In apprechtion and gratitude from the City Coundl on behalf of the cid-ens of the City of Temecula, For their generous support of the Old Town Temecula Senior Center by assisting in the purchase of a h~ndic~pped equipped van to better serve the needs of the Senior Citizens of Temecula. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto affixed my hand and official seal this 23rd day of May, 1995 leffrey E. Stone Mayor lune S. Greek, CMC City Clerk ITEM 8 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL R~ CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFIC R CITY MANAGE CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer May 23, 1995 Supplement No. 007 to Local Agency Agreement No. 008-5459 for Federal Aid Projects No. BRLS-5459(003)for Federal Grant Funding for Pale Road Bridge RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 95- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT NO. 007, TO LOCAL AGENCY AGREEMENT NO. 08-5459, BETWEEN THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR FEDERAL AID PROJECT NO. BRLS-5459(003), PALA ROAD BRIDGE BACKGROUND: In conjunction with the preliminary engineering for Pale Road Bridge Replacement, several studies are required by the Corp of Engineers, Department of Fish and Game and Caltrans. These studies include Historical Evaluation of existing bridge, Hydrology end Hydraulics of the existing channel of Temecula Creek, and preliminary alignment studies. The cost of the above studies, for which the County (AD159) received proposals is $270,000. The hydrology and hydraulics study is completed, other studies will be awarded to consultants in the near future. The $270,000 represents the costs of preliminary assessments prior to beginning the design phase. The Federal Grant amount is 80% or $216,000 with 20% local match or $54,000. The local match will be shared by the County of Riverside (AD 159), and the City. FISCAL IMPACT: Funds will be available in the Capital Improvement Budget, if approved by the City Council, Fiscal Year 1995-2000, Pale Road Bridge. - 1 - r.~gdrl~gb"%O523%sul~OO7.egn/eile ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution No. 95- 2. Supplement No. 007 to Local Agency Agreement No. 08-5459 for Federal Aid Projects BRLS-5459(003)for Federal Grant Funding for Pala Road Bridge -2- r.~ag(ImZ%gS~O522%eupOO7.egn/alp RESOLUTION NO. A RF~OLUTION OF THE C1TY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING SUPPIJ~:MENT NO. 007, TO LOCAL AGENCY AGI~F-I~tENT NO. 08-54~9, Bk;rws,:s,:N THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE CITY OF T]~4ECULA FEDERAL Am PRO~.~'r NO. BRI~9(003 BI~IDGE I/EPLACEMENT, PALA ROAD.AT TEMECIJIA C~F. EK_ (BR. NO. 57C-165') The City Council of the City of Temecula does resolve, determine and order as follows: WHEREAS, City Council at their regHi.r meeting of March 23rd, 1993 adopted Resolution No. 93-26. WI~'3~EAS, ~aid Re~lution approved the Local Agency/State Agreement No. 08-S459. WH~:KF_,AS, said Resolution provided for supplemental agreements to be adopted by the Council for each individual project which utilizes the Federal Funds. WHEREAS, City has applied for Federal Funds to perform the preliminary engineerhg study on replacement of Pala Road Bridge at Temecula Creek, BR. No. 57C-165. ~VIIEREAS, these funds are available and subject to Program Supplement No. 007 for Local Agency State Agreement for Federal Aid Pwject No. BRJ~-5459(003). NOW, THEREFOR, BE 1T RESOLV!~ by the City Council of the City of Temecula, as follows: Section 1. Section 2. That the City Council appwve and authorize execution of Program Supplement No. 007 to Local Agency State Agreement for Federal Aid Project No. BRLS-5459(003). Authorize the Mayor to execute said Agreement. Section 3. The City Clerk shall codify the adoption of this resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temeafia at a regular meeting held on the 23rd day of May, 1995. ATTEST: Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor June S. Greek City Clerk -3- r:~agdqat~6~O523%eulK)OT. egn/elp [S~L] _,,,, STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, lune S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 95- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 23rd day of May, 1995 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: CO~CILM~ERS: CO~CIL1WEMBERS: CO~CILMEMBERS: CO~CILlW~-~~: -4- r..~agdq~SS~:)523%eupOO7.agrdajl; STATE OF CAUFORNIA---NJSINE~, TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (909) 383-5959 May 10, 1995 08-Riv-0-TEM BRLS-5459 (003) Pala Road @ Temecula Creek Br. No. 56C-0165 Bridge Replacement WILSON, Governor ]~'. Joseph Kicak Director of Public Works/ City Engineer City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 : By Dear ~. Kicak: Enclosed for your execution are two Program Supplements No. 007 to Local Agency-State Agreement for Federal-Aid Project No. 08-5459 for the above-referenced project. Please type in the date of execution and return the original documents with a certified copy of the authorized resolution to this office no later than June 15, 1995. This will allow our staff in Sacramento to process this agreement prior to June 30. Execution beyond the requested date may require re-execution of an additional program supplement agreement after July 1. Your prompt cooperation will reduce processing time for all concerned. After completion of these documents, your original document will be returned for your files. If you have. any questions, please call Mr. Ernie Rogers at (909) 383-4578. Very truly yours, LOUIS W. FLORES Chief, Local Assistance Encl. Date: May 3, 1995 PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT NO. 007~}k~A. Looation= 08-RIV-0-TEM to "" "~"'~roject N-mher: BRLS-5459(003) LOCAL AGENCY-STATE AGREEMENT E.A. Number: 08-198274 FOR FEDERAL-AID PROJECTS NO. 08-5459 This Program Supplement is hereby incorporated into the Local Agency-St Agreement for Federal Aid which was entered into between the Local Agen~f and the State on 03/23/93 and is subject to all the terms and conditions thereof. This Program Supplement is adopted in accordance with Paragraph 2 of Article II of the aforementioned Master Agreement under authority of Resolution No. , approved by the Local Agency on (See copy attached). The Local Agency further stipulates that as a condition to payment of funds obligated to this project, it accepts and will comply with the covenants or remarks setforth on the following pages. PROJECT TERMINI: IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, PALA RD @ TEMECULA CREEK, BR. NO. 57C-165 TYPE OF WORK: REPLACE BRIDGE LENGTH: 0.1 (MILES) PROJECT CLASSIFICATION OR PHASE(S) OF WORK IX] Preliminary Engineering [ ] Right-of-Way [ ] Construction Engineering [ ] Construction [ ] Estimated Cost~ Federal Funds Matching Funds 270000 118 $ 216000 $ $ 0 Local OTHER OTHER 54000 $ 0 $ City of Temecula STATE OF CALIFORNIA Department of Transportation By By Chief, Local Assistance District 8 Date Date Attest Title I hereby Certify upon e/personal knowtedge that budgeted funds are avaitable for this enct~bra~ce: t Program Iec] Fund Source 216000.00 N~OIJNT 139 1W4 2660-101-890 9~,-95 20.30.010.300 C 22~,060 892-F 216000.00 Page i of 2 08 -RIV-0-TEM BRLS-5459(003) SPECIAL COVENANTS OR REMARKS DATE: 05/03/95 1. The Local Agency will advertise, award, and administer this project and will obtain the State's concurrence prior to either award or rejection of the contract. 2. The Local Agency agrees the payment of Federal funds will be limited to the amounts approved by the Federal Highway Administration in the Federal-Aid Project Agreement (PR-2)/Detail Estimate, or its modification (PR-2A) or the FNM-76, and accepts any increases in Local Agency Funds as shown on the Finance or Bid Letter or its modification as prepared by the State and Local Project Development Program. 3. This Program Supplement will be revised at.a later date to include other phases of work. 4. In executing this Program Supplemental Agreement, Local Agency hereby reaffirms the "Nondiscrimination Assurances" contained in the aforementioned Master Agreement for Federal-Aid Program. 5. Whenever the local agency uses a consultant on a cost plus basis, the local agency is required to submit a post audit report cover- ing the allowability of cost payments for each individual consul- tant or sub-contractor incurring over $25,000 on the project. The audit report must state the applicable cost principles utili' zed by the auditor in determining allowable costs as referenoed in CFR 49, part 18, Subpart C - 22, Allowable Costs. Page 2 of 2 Date: May 3, 1995 PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT NO..007 ~'~.~,T.~,~ .~, Location: 08-RIV-0-TEM to Project Number= BRLS-5459 (003) LOCAL AGENCY-STATE AGREEMENT E,A, Number: 08-198274 FOR FEDERAL-AID PROJECTS NO. 08-5459 This Program Supplement is hereby incorporated into the Local Agency-S' Agreement for Federal Aid which was entered into between the Local Age._.f and the State on 03/23/93 and is subject to all the terms and conditions thereof, This Program Supplement is adopted in accordance with Paragraph 2 of Article II of the aforementioned Master Agreement under authority of Resolution No. , approved by the Local Agency on (See copy attached). The Local Agency further stipulates that as a condition to payment of funds obligated to this project, it accepts and will comply with the covenants or remarks setforth on the following pages. PROJECT TERMINI: IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, PALA RD @ TEMECULA CREEK, BR. NO. 57C-165 TYPE OF WORK: REPLACE BRIDGE LENGTH: 0.1 (MILES) PROJECT CLASSIFICATION OR PHASE(S) OF WORK [X] Preliminary Engineering [ ] Right-of-Way [ ] Construction Engineering [ ] Construction [ ] Estimated Cost~ Federal Funds Matching Funds 270000 118 $ 216000 $ $ o Local OTHER 54000 $ o $ OTHER City of Temecula STATE OF CALIFORNIA Department of Transportation By By Chief, Local Assistance District 8 Date Date Attest Title I hereby Certify upon my personat kno. tedge that buctgeted funcis are svai tabte for this encuabrance: t Program Iscl Fund Source 216000.00 139 1996 2660-101-890 9&-95 20.30.010.300 C 22~,060 892-F 21(:4)00.00 Page I of 2 08 -RIV-0-TEM BRLS-5459 (003) SPECIAL COVENANTS OR REMARKS DATE: 05/03/95 1. The Local Agency will advertise, award, and administer this project and will obtain the State's concurrence prior to either award or rejection of the contract. 2. The Local Agency agrees the payment of Federal funds will be limited to the amounts approved by the Federal Highway Administration in the Federal-Aid Project Agreement (PR-2)/Detail Estimate, or its modification (PR-2A) or the FNM-76, and accepts any increases in Local Agency Funds as shown on the Finance or Bid Letter or its modification as prepared by the State and Local Project Development Program. 3. This Program Supplement will be revised at.a later date to include other phases of work. 4. In executing this Program Supplemental Agreement, Local Agency hereby reaffirms the "Nondiscrimination Assurances" contained in the aforementioned Master Agreement for Federal-Aid Program. 5. Whenever the local agency uses a consultant on a cost plus basis, the local agency is required to submit a post audit report cover- ing the allowability of cost payments for each individual consul- tant or sub-contractor incurring over $25,000 on the project. The audit report must state the applicable cost principles utili- zed by the auditor in determining allowable costs as referenced in CFR 49, part 18, Subpart C - 22, Allowable Costs. Page 2 of 2 ITEM 9 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer May 23, 1995 Amended Memorandum of Understanding - Access to Winchester Road and State Route 79 South PREPARED BY: Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council APPROVE the amended Memorandum of Understanding with Caltrans and AUTHORIZE the Mayor to sign. BACKGROUND: Attached you will find an amended Memorandum of Understanding |MOU) between the City of Temecula and the State of California Caltrans. This MOU sets forth access criteria to be used by the City and Caltrans in approving future development along Winchester Road and State Route 79 South (SR79S). It is a result of months of public workshops to solicit property owner input resulting in the attached Planning Commission Recommendation, end Caltrans review end approval. Although each highway is within the the boundaries of the City of Temecula, they are each ultimately under the jurisdiction of the State of California Caltrans. City Staff has negotiated closer access spacing in response to community input, as noted in the MOU, which is now acceptable to both agencies. FISCAL IMPACT: None currently. Since it will be easier to site commercial development along each corridor using the new criteria, sales tax revenue to City may be increased in the future. ATTACHMENTS: Memorandum of Understanding Planning Commission Recommendation - Minutes of September 19, 1995 ald~t~95~O523~ae-ndm,~u.w79 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING This Memorandum of Understanding is between the State of California, Department of Transportation (herelnafter Caltrans) and the City of Temecula (hereinafter the City). This Memorandum of Understanding (NIOU) constitutes solely a guide to the respective obligations, intentions and policies of the City and Caltrans to use in approving new development along north and south State Route 79. This MOU has not been designed to authorize funding for project effort, nor is it a legally binding contract. It is the intent of this MOU to establish a mutual policy which will lead to a cooperative agreement between Caltrans and the City within approximately twelve (12) months after the execution of this MOU. The basic understanding is as follows: NORTH ROUTE 79 0NINCHESTER ROAD) Route 79 shall have up to three lanes for through traffic and up to two lanes for local circulation'. Realignment my be necessary upon future development along Route 79. The City shall protect the right-of-way for said realignment. Ronte 79 is to have 114 mile intersection spacing with 118 mile spacing for limited access driveways (i.e. right in, right out only) from 1-15 to Margarita Rd. 3. From Margarita Road to Murrieta Hot Springs Road the spacing shall be 1/4 mile intersections. 4. Intersection spacing beyond Murrieta Hot Springs Road will be 1/2 mile. 5. Approvals prior to the date of this MOU are excepted. SOUTI{ROUTE79 Route 79 is to have 1/4 mile intersection spacing and 1/8 mile limited access driveway spacing from 1-15 to Ann Road. 2. Approvals prior to the date of this MOU are excepted. APPLIES TO NORTH & SOUTH ROUTE 79 Intersection and limited access design shall be developed in accordance with policies, procedures, practices and standards normally followed by Caltrans and the City. Eventual realignment of Route 79 may be necessary due to development along current Route 79. Should a new alignment of Highway 79 be mutually agreed upon by the City and Caltrans, the City shall cooperate with Caltrans to the greatest extent practicable to provide CalWans future right-of-way protection for Route 79 realignment through negotiations. I Concur: ROBERT W. SASSAMAN, Acting District Director District 8 JEFFREY E. STONE, Mayor City of Temecula Date Date Attachment A ! · ! rv Attachment B I.D, S.R. 79 (North)/Winchester Road Access Recommendations State Rome 79 Access Study Approx. Spacing in M~le~ Type of Access Permitted Access Loca;tion NB 1-15 Off*Ramp 1 SB Convenience Center Driveway 2 Ynez Rd. tApprox. Spacin8 in Rm)/Essmide Waste•de Eastside Westside - Right In Right In North- South. and and Full Full bound tmund Right Out Right Out Movement Movement , , ~ , 3 SB PM 23335 AccRs 3 NB Rag. Ctr. PhMe I Mirror Accees ...... '~"'~ Rag. Ctr. Phase I Main Access mmee~weeeeeeeleee~ I "" 5 Regiontl (~tr. S. Minor Access I II 7 I Regional Ctr. N. Minor Acce~._J II ................... : .................. I ............ 9 SB I Winchester Meadows S. Minor ................... , ...... ' ~ ' Rorzoau;n Rd. 11 NB Roripaugh Village Minor !1 ...................; I! ~ 2 NichOlas Re. 13 NB o.oso(0. Rancho Temecula Towne Ctr. o.;11(0. o.~1o(0. 0.293(0.472) , "' , 0.455 [0.7331' , i --- {-- 261 ) i C.:e2(O. I i 13· i I 7 I /+ 10 ,,, ........... .""' .... i51D. (0.i/~..);',...,:,...I. i " , , [] [] i79}.111 (0~~,~ ~;.~.:'.~;~ ~S~:, I , ! .. ,.~ .- .....~--~:-;.- >~ ~-~-...~--~ ,~ --:;,~,I ....- ......... 177p.~ (0~,~ .~ ....~0 . . ....... . .. ~ .... , , o.~ ~2(0. i80D.~ +----- 0 ...... . ....... ~ ........ , - t t .. · . ~.~1(0..~79~.~!~79) · * ' ...": .'. '... ',~,";.: '.. , ~ "t , r'- . , ~ 0.123 ~'2' ....., '., ' t ,- ' ' · -:: .....:- - " ~" ' 0.246( O. ~03 ) ' ~ ......... t ............... s 0.123 (0~98) . . ~ · I .............. . , ~ ..................~ ................ Attachment B S.R, 79 (North)/Winchester Road Access Recommendations (cont.) 13.1 State Route 79 Access Study Approx. Spacing in Miles (Approx, Spacing in F~-)Eastside Right In Access Location North- South- end bound · bound Right Out Rustic Glen Dr. IChao Driveway (Approx, SPacing in K_~) 14 NB Chao Access .. I I .................-' ............. t 15 I Winchester Creek Dr./%Nillows I 16 Salk;n Ac:ess 16.1 SB 16.1 NB Saikin Minor Access Ceas Minor Access - CUP 914 [] -, Proposed Access (Change in 8/91 MOU} · = Right In Only 17 Murrieta Hot Springs Rd. (new alignment) Legenc: Type of Access Permitted Westside Eastside Westside Right In and Full Full Right Out Movement Movement , m.j [] I ' o.12, ( o .~o4 >. ~"":"~';':"' ""' '; :."'.-i":':.."'.."iL ."" .............i .........' ............. I , 0.332(0,535)rl ; ' I Q.205 ( 0 J330 ) ~;i.~.~,~...~,; ,,:,,;.L~..,.'?..~,~' ...,,,:,:?~.,,~.,....l---.. ..... 'f'" "?~ "i ' ' i .... ' I .... ' .... ' I ' [] ! -----, t , o.leo[9.290),.' , ~ ...... ~., I I ! ..t 0.280(0.~."~1)0.~00(0.'16.~ ........i, .,,. I I [] I [] 1 i -i c.o99(0. ~59~o.o99 (o..~,59) ::,.. ,', --4.-- I I I I [] I I I I I I I I [] == Access Existing Or Consistent With 8/91 MOU Attachment C z 0 U ~J 0 U Attachment D I.D. 0 S.R. 79 {South) Access Recommendations Access Location NB I-15 Off-Ramp State Rotrte 79 Access Study Apl3rox. Spacing in Miles (Approx. Epacing in KII;oumside Right In East- West- and bound bound Right Out 0.134((}~21~0.134(0.'~1,6.~'..,, Type of Access Perrob'ted Northside Right In end Right Out .,t, Sotfffisicle Nonhsicle Full Full Movement Movement .[:: .... ..e_:.::! ............ ., :; ,c :-_ , 'va:, Rancr. Ct' Ac:ess : [] o. , s( . !83) o. ..................................................... r , o.; 20(0. t93) o. ........................................................................ r , ~ c. ~ 2o(0. I93) o. ~ 2o (0. L93) 11 I Paloma De~ Sol Ctr. Dr. ~ ,__ 0.133(0. 140,133(O..~b)4*':r,;.,-. t" 4' : __._2. _ t, paz st. .:~G3) :.t~_}!"":"'; ....".' ., .. ......... ........1---- .......... ,. o. ~ sa(O.o. ~ 8stO.::.1 ........ [] [] ' I ' · ! ............ F ',1 3 Waoash In. t [] o. ~ 94(0. 12) '::Y"}~'iT. ---- -----. .... f". ::. .-- .,-..-.:;',z-;:4..:;'-:;;:;:;'., ........ .,,=.... :.:E ...............: .....:: .... ~ece~la~ Sm,t~ Rc. ! o.T~ ) ...................... j c. ~ ee (0. ) "' ' F ' '" ' --.~ -~-~ 6 Constance A St. ~ ' ' ' 0.~33(0. 9) ."~" ~'"': y, "', ' p' ';,,~,..~"~" 6.1 EB ' New S~uthsi~e Minor 0.271 (0.4~) ~ ~ -I ' C.;35(0. ~7) ' ~ ....... ~ .......... -F ., 'r., '.~ .~:, .--, ., i. ] .J .... , ....... ..~ f --.-~-- , ::...~f....~:_!...'i~:] ~.~o.~..,...,..,,~r' o.~,<o.~>a_~ .......... ,. i I c.: ,u. ~) t I-- ~-.- ; ........T~ .......l ~,a:o~s Pk,v.] : ', , I ~ ~ ~ 'l >,.-,.L,--.F~.~:-.~-.u.,~L~'~-i ....~:;a~>o..,,<o. ~, = ":L-:.::::Zk:Z__LL___: """;"'%" ........?""i~';""T;~ ....... ~ .............. I ......... E:'~E3'%;:'~;;z;T~'~r~ .....EZZ2~VZ2%'ZZZZ%2Z:ZZZ~:ZZ2' .......... Attachment D I.D, S.R. 79 (South) Access Recommendations {cont.) S.R. 79 South Access Study Approx. Spacing in Miles Type of Access Permitted ,'Approx. Spacin8 in }~vJ~outhside i Northside Soutmicle Northsicle ' Right In i Right In Access Location Eat- We~t- end ~ end Full Full tmund bound Right Out I Right Out Movement Movement 1"!', Propa,,ed Access (Ch,,nge in 8/81 MOU) il ,- Acc~-~ Exi~in9 Or Con=i--tent With 8/81 MOU 13.1 EB FuT. Tract # 23172 Minor 13.2 Tract # 23172 Minor B--,,'te.'f.,e-'C Stage Re. 14'. 1 WE PM 6428 Drwy. (C~mn. R. nch) 15 EB Temecula Creek Rd. Legend: MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 19, 1994 A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Planning Commission was called to order on Monday, September 19, 1994, 6:00 P.M., at the Rancho California Water District Board Room, 42135 Winchester Road, Temecula, California. The meeting was called to order by Chairman Steve Ford. PRESENT: 3 ABSENT: 2 COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: Slaven, Webster, Ford Blair, Fahey Also present were Planning Director Gary Thornhill, Assistant City Attorney Greg Diaz and 'Senior Planner Debbie Ubnos.ke. PUBLIC COMMENT None COMMISSION BUSINESS 2. AoDroval of Aaenda Chairman Ford recommended Items 1. and 3. be heard after the Public Hearing Items. It was moved by Commissioner Slaven, seconded by Commissioner Webster to re- order agenda Items I and 3 to follow item Number 9 on the agenda. The motion carried as follows: AYES: 3 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 2 COMMISSIONERS: Slaven, Webster, Ford COMMISSIONERS: ' None COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Fahey 4. Director's Hearina Uodate Report included in the agenda package. Commissioner Fahey arrived at 6:10 P.M. and was no longer considered absent. PP.,MINOgll 91i4 01128194 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES NON-PUBLIC HEARING ITEM~ SEPTEMBER 19, 1994 5. Memorandum of Understandina For Access Onto State Route 79 Principal Engineer Ray Casey presented the staff report. Chairman Ford questioned why the staff is not making recommendations on Highway 79 South, Tract 23299, and Paloma Del Sol project, prior to reviewing the traffic study. Engineer Casey said at this time staff can only support a right in at location 9 (EB) and 10.1 of the staff report. However, staff has no opinion on whether it should be a right-in only or a right-in and right-out. Commissioner Fahey asked how the areas that have not been resolved are handled with the approval of the MOU. Engineer Casey said staff would like the Commission to provide direction to staff on Items 9 EB and 10.1 . He explained the issue staff has concerning these two items is local circulation and access to the Highway itself with respect to the commercial center. Tract 23299 (9EB) or (County Glen Way), is proposed for a full turning movement access with a traffic signal. Should that be approved, there may be enough room for cars exiting the commercial center to get over to Margarita Road and make a left turn or a U-turn, subject to further traffic analysis. He said without that full turning movement access and the traffic signal, staff does not feel they can support a right-inkight-out however, the property owner's Traffic Engineer has not as yet provided staff with adequate analysis to support the right-in/right-outs. Staff has the same concerns with the Paloma Del Sol project shown as 10.1 . Commissioner Fahey said she feels comfortable allowing staff to make the determination on these two issues prior to sending the MOU on to the City Council. It was moved by Commissioner Fahey, seconded by Commissioner Siaven to approve the Memorandum of Understanding with staff's clarification on Items 9 EB and 10.1 prior to presenting the MOU to the City Council. The motion carried as follows: AYES: 4 COMMISSIONERS: Fahey,' Siaven, Webster, Ford NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: 1' COMMISSIONERS: Blair R:::MINO9119/94 2 09128/94 ITEM 10 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY MANAGE~ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer May 23, 1995 Tree Trimming Program in Starlight Ridge Area RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council authorize staff to call for bids for Tree Trimming Program in the Starlight Ridge Area. BACKGROUND: Staff has been requested by several residents to implement a Tree Trimming Program for the above referenced area. Review of the field condition indicated that trees in the area have not been trimmed for quite some time and are preventing efficient trash collection and street sweeping. During the field review, staff identified approximately 417 trees that should be trimmed. Estimated cost for the program would be approximately 970,000. FISCAL IMPACT: Funds are available in the Public Works Routine Street Maintenance Account No. 100-164- 601-5402 for that purpose. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Tree Trimming List -1- r.%egdq~S%O623%tmetdm. egNajl~ 28860 Mira Loma 29800 Mira Loma 29770 Mira Loma 29650 Mira Loma 29590 Mira Loma LOCATION 29870 Mira Loma Mira Loma between Rancho Vista & CaRe Violeta south side of street 30111 Casa Chata Pla~ 30165 Casa Chata Place 30136 Casa Chata Place 30070 Calle Carranza 29585 Ca!le Violeta Comer of Santa Cecilia & Mira Loma Dr. 30020 Santa Cecilia Dr. 30021 Santa Cecilia Dr. 30041 Santa Cecilia Dr. 30040 Santa Cecilia Dr. 30050 Santa Cecilia Dr. 30069 Santa Cecilia Dr. 30070 Santa Cecilia Dr. 30116 Santa Cecilia Dr. 30118 Santa Cecilia Dr. 30276 Santa Cecilia Dr. 30308 Santa Cecilia Dr. 30320 Santa Cecilia Dr. 30336 Santa Cecilia Dr. 30347 Santa Cecilia Dr. 30350 Santa Cecilia Dr. 30366 Santa Cecilia Dr. CITY OF TEMECULA PUBLIC WORKS TREE TRIMMING SCOPE OF WORK Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Trim (each side of enuane, e of Ranthe Apartments) Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise' Full Trim & Root Prune Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Trim Trim Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise 1 2 1 1 3 2 5 6 I 1 2 '1 4 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 -5 1 1 2 1 1 1 LOCATION 30388 Santa Cecilia Dr. 30381 Santa Cecilia Dr. 30138 Santa Cecilia Dr. 30277 Caprice Court 42624 Remora Street 42623 Remora Street 42611 Remora Street Between EMWD Easement & Santa Cecilia Dr. 42500 Carino Place 30055 Levande Place 30071 Levande Place 30074 Levande Place 30319 Veradero Place 30333 Veradero Place 30341 Veradero Place 30396 Veradero Place 30788 Mira Loma Dr. (north o0 30648 Mira Loma Dr. 30360 Senela Place 30375 Senela Place 30383 Senela Place 30387 Senela Place 30378 Senela Place 30507 Moontide Court 30519 Moontide Court 30533 Moontide Court 30573 Moontide Court 30627 Moontide Court ~--, 30641 Moontide Court - ~l" 30650 Moontide Court 'CITY OF ~ PUBLIC WORKS TR!~ TRIMMING SCOPE Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & ~ Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & ]~nlse Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise OF WORK QUANTITY 1 1 1 4 1 1 1 3 1' 3 1 2 .1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 -1 1 1 1 1 1 1 LOCATION 30644 Moonfide Court 30634 Moontide Court 30628 Moontide Court 30489 Spica Court 30503 Spica Court 30517 Spica Court 30529 Spica Court 30541 Spica Court 30528 Spica Court 30494 Spica Court 42468 Cosmic Dr. 42450 Cosmic Dr. 42430 Cosmic Dr. 42400 Cosmic Dr. 42385 Cosmic Dr. 42371 Cosmic Dr. 42367 Cosmic Dr. 42353 Cosmic Dr. 42339 Cosmic Dr. Access From 42339 Cosmic Dr. 42327 CoSmic Dr. 42310 Cosmic Dr. 42285 Cosmic Dr. 42286 Cosmic Dr. 42275 Cosmic Dr. Across From 42259 Cosmic Dr. 42245 Cosmic Dr. 42230 Cosmic Dr. 42214 Cosmic Dr. 42200 Cosmic Dr. CITY OF TERF, CIF_,A PUBLIC WORKS Tlzl~ TRIMMING SCOPE OF WORK Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2' 1 1 1 ,1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 -1 1 1 1 1 1 42176 Cosmic Dr. 42201 Cosmic Dr. 42148 Cosmic Dr. 42120 Cosmic Dr. 42015 Cosmic Dr. (south of) 30304 Nebula Lane 30290 Nebula Lane 41909 Boreals Dr. 41910 Boreals Dr. 41893 Boreals Dr. 41884 Boreals Dr. 41883 Boreals Dr. 41864 Boreals Dr. 41869 Boreals Dr. 41850 Boreals Dr. 41855 Boreals Dr. 41828 Boreals Dr. 41837 Boreals Dr. 41806 Boreals Dr. 41819 Borales Dr. 41792 Boreals Dr. 41799 Boreals Dr. 41787 Boreals Dr. 41768 Boreals Dr. 41767 Boreals Dr. 41736 Boreals Dr. 41747 Boreals Dr. 41731 Boreals Dr. 30407 MHky Way Dr. 3o41o M ky Way Dr. LOCATION 'CITY OF TEN~CIfLA PUBLIC WORKS TRRR TRIMMING SCOPE OF WORK Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Ratso Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise QUANTITY 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1' 1 1 1 .1 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 -1 1 1 1 1 1 1 LOCATION 30424 Milky Way Dr. 3&.~.9 Milky Way Dr. 30454 lVIilky Way Dr. 30463 MHky Way Dr. 30468 MHky Way Dr. 30481 Milky Way Dr. 30484 Milky Way Dr. 30512 Milky Way Dr. 30526 Milky Way Dr. 30540 Milky Way Dr. 30~58 Milky Way Dr. 30~61 Milky Way Dr. 30~87 Milky Way Dr. 30631 Milky Way Dr. 30657 Milky Way Dr. 306~ Milky Way Dr. 30709 Milky Way Dr. Morning Ridge Apartments 41899 Asteroid Way 41890 Asteroid Way 41883 Asteroid Way 41865 Asteroid Way 41841 Asteroid Way 41800 Asteroid Way 41801 Asteroid Way 41760 Asteroid Way 41755 Asteroid Way 41740 Asteroid Way 41739 Asteroid Way 41720 Asteroid Way 'CITY OF TEMF_CULA PUBLIC WORKS TI~EE TRIMMING SCOPE OF WORK Full Trim & Rai-~e Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & ]~nise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise 1 1 1 2 2 1 1' 1 1 1 .1 1 1 12 10 1 1 1 1 1 -1 1 1 2 1 I '! 41711 Asteroid Way 42300 Agena St. 42288 Agena St. 42270 Agena St. 42258 Agena St. 42234 Agena St. 42220 Agena St. 42150 Agena St. 42144 Agenn St. 42130 Agena St. 42102 Agena St. 42103 Agena St. 42117 Agena St. 42131 Agena St. 42145 Agena St. 42159 Agena St. 42173 Agena St. 42189 Agena St. 42201 Agena St. 42215 Agena St. 42235 Agena St. 42249 Agena St. 42263 Agena St. 42293 Agena St. 42307 Agena St. 42321 Agena St. 42335 Agena St. 42351 Agena St. 42762 Agena St. 43071 Agena St. LOCATION CITY OF ~ PUBLIC WORKS TI~-~- TRIMMING SCOPE FUll Full Full Full Full Full Full Full Full Full Full Trim & Trim & Raise Trim & Raise Trim & Raise Trim & Raise Trim & Raise Trim & Raise Trim & Raise Trim&Rais~ Trim & l~a_,se Trim & P, aiss Full Trim & Rrase Full Trim & Rinse Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise 6 OF WORK QUANTITY 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 1' 2 1 1 .1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 -1 1 1 1 1 1 1 43061 Agena St. 42993 Agena St. 42994 Agena St. 425)80 Agena St. 425)68 Agena 425)63 Agena St. 425)54 Agena St. 425)28 Agena St. 428~0 Agena St. 42878 Agena St. 42864 Agena St. 42850 Agenn St. LOCATION 42838 Agena St. Across From 42838 Agena St. 42817 Agena St. 42741 Agena St. 42470 Ageha St. 42456 Agena St. 42440 Agena St. 42436 Agena St. 42384 Agena St. 42372 Agena St. 42360 Agena St. 42338 Agena St. 43020 Agena St. 42326 Agena St. 42365 Agena St. 42371 Agena St. 42385 Agena St. 424(D Agena St. CITYOF~ PUBLIC WORKS Ti~Eg TRIMMING SCOPE OF WORK Full Trim & lhi.~e Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & ]!ai-~e Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise QUANTITY 1 1 1 1 3 1 1' 1 2 1 I 1 -1 1 1 LOCATION 42445 Agena St. 42471 Agena St. 30681 Southern Cross Rd. 30682 Southern Cross Rd. 30666 Southern Cross Rd. 30656 Southern Cross Rd. 30764 Sky Terrace Dr. 30756 Sky Terrace Dr. 30750 Sky Terrace Dr. 30740 Sky Terrace Dr. 30676 Sky Terrace Dr. 30662 Sky Terrace Dr. 30665 Sky Terrace Dr. 30673 Sky Terrace Dr. 30679 Sky Terrace Dr. 30687 Sky Terrace Dr. 30695 Sky Terrace Dr. 30703 Sky Terrace Dr. 30747 Sky Terrace Dr. 30755 Sky Terrace Dr. 30961 Sky Terrace Dr. 30769 Sky Terrace Dr. 30410 Del Rey P,d. 40629 Carmilita Circle 40489 Carmilita Circle 28540 Felix Valdez Ave. Northwest corner of Felix Valdez Ave. at Baldary Circle CITY OF TEMECULA PUBLIC WORKS TRER II~MMING SCOPE Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise FUll Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & P, aise' Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & P, ase Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Ra:se Full Trim & P, mse Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise Full Trim & Raise OF WORK QUANTITY 1 '2 3 3 1 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 .1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 2 1 3 LOCATION Southeast corner Ynez Rd. at Calle Halcon Northeast comer Avenida Barca at Margarita Rd. 30521 Iron Bark Court 28576 CabrHlo Avenue 30050 Cabrillo Avenue 30105 CabrHlo Avenue 30130 CabrHlo Avenue Comer of Cabrillo Avenue and John Warher Road 30260 Cabrillo Avenue 30300 CabrHlo Avenue South of 30395 Cabrfilo Avenue North east comer of CabrHlo Avenue at Yorba Avenue 30433 Cabrillo Avenue 30465 Cabrillo Avenue Across from 30520 Cabrillo Avenue 30650 Cabrillo Avenue Across from 30650 Cabri!lo Avenue Across from 30601 Cabrillo Avenue 30460 CabrHlo Avenue 44100 E. Vallejo Avenue 44181 E. Va!lejo Avenue 41900 Yorba Avenue 41770 John Warher Rd. (120 ft. east of Cabrillo Ave) 'CITY OF TEMECULA PUBLIC WORKS TIu~ TRIMMING SCOPE OF WORK Root Pnme Pine Tree where it is lifting sidewalk Trim over hanging branches for signal Root Prune Full Trim and Raise Trim branches back away from edge of pavement and Raise Full Trim and Raise Full Trim and Raise Full Trim and Raise Full Trim and Raise Trim branches back away from edge of pavement and Raise Trim branches back away from edge of pavement and Raise Trim branches back away from edge of pavement and Raise Trim branches back away from edge of pavement and Raise Trim branches back away from edge of pavement and Raise Trim branches back away from edge of pavement and Raise Full Trim and Raise Trim branches back away from edge of pavement and Raise Trim branches back away fzom edge of pavement and Raise Trim branches back away from edge of pavement and Raise Full Trim and Raise Full Trim and Raise Trim branches back away from edge of pavement and Raise Full Trim and Raise 5 8 1 1 1 3 3 15 6 6 4 1 8 4 9 r.~ma~nt~mmun~ LOCATION 28565 Vallejo Avenue 30151 Santiago Rd. CITY OF TEMECULA PUBLIC WORKS TRI~-E TRIMMING SCOPE OF WORK Trim branches back away ~'om edge of pavement and Raise Full Trim and Raise [QUANTrrY 5 TOTAL NUMBER OF TREES 417 ITEM 11 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL ~_ CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICE CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer May 23, 1995 Release Traffic Signal Mitigation Bond in Tract No. 26861-3 PREPARED BY.~ Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council AUTHORIZE the release of Traffic Signal Mitigation Bond in Tract No. 26861-3, and DIRECT the City Clerk to so notify the Developer and Surety. BACKGROUND: On January 27, 1993, the City Council entered into subdivision agreements with: The Presley Companies 15010 Avenue of Science, Suite 201 San Diego, CA 92128 for the improvement of private streets, installation of private water and sewer systems, and payment of Traffic Signal Mitigation fees in Tract No. 26861-3. The bonds were posted by The American Insurance Company as follows: Bond No. 111 '3301 9460 in the amount of $70,500 for the improvement of private streets and drainage. Bond No. 111 3301 9478 in the amount of $37,500 for the improvement of private water system Bond No. 111 3301 9486 in the amount of $28,000 for the improvement of priva;ce sewer system Bond No's 111 3301 9460, 111 3301 9478, and 111 3301 9486 in the amounts of $35,500, $19,000, and $14,000, respectively, for labor and material for private streetsand drainage, and water and sewer systems. Bond No. 111 2720 4896 in the amount of $6,150 to guarantee payment of traffic signal mitigation fees. I r:%agdrpt%95%O523~TR268613.Ten/ajp Bond No. 111 2720 0472 in the amount of $660 for the placement of subdivision monumentation. The following item has been completed by the developer in accordance with the agreements: Traffic Signal Mitigation fees within Tract No. 26861-3 Public Works Staff has confirmed that the subject fees have been paid by the developer. The Public Works Department therefore recommends release of the Traffic Signal Mitigation Bond as follows: Bond No. 111 2720 4896 in the amount of $6,150. The developer has not completed the contractual improvements at this time. Therefore, no reduction or release of any other bonds is included in this action. The affected streets are private streets and will not be accepted into the City maintained street system. The private streets within this condominium subdivision are portions of "Chelsea Way", "Briarwood Place", and "Arbor Lane". FISCAL IMPACT: None Attachments: Location Map 2 r:%agdrpt%95~O523%TR268613,tsm/ajp TRACT NO. 26861-3 I,ocation Map ITEM 12 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL ~ CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFIC R CITY MANAGE CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer May 23, 1995 "Stop" Controls on Milky Way Drive at Asteroid Way PREPARED BY: Martin C. Lauber, Traffic Engineer RECOMMENDATION: The Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 95- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING "STOP SIGNS" BACKGROUND: The Traffic Division was contacted regarding traffic safety in the Starlight Ridge neighborhood. The major concern was that some intersections in the northeastern portion of Starlight Ridge do not have intersection controls. Most of the intersections without controls in Starlight Ridge are local street "T" intersections with good visibility. At these intersections, motorists are required to yield to traffic if they are approaching on the steam of the "T". Sections 21800 of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) regulates the assignment of right-of-way (ROW) at all intersections including "T" intersections. The intersection of Milky Way Drive and Asteroid Way currently forms a four (4) way intersection without any assignment of ROW. The Caltrans Traffic Manual describes seven (7) conditions which are used as guidelines for determining the possible need for stop and yield controls. Staff has reviewed all the conditions and found Number 5 to apply to Milky Way Drive when approaching Asteroid Way. Condition Number 5 reads; On a minor street where the safe approach speed to the intersection is less than ten (10) miles per hour. Due to roadway geometrics and existing visibility, the safe approach speed was determined to be below ten (10) miles per hour. Therefore, both staff and the Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommend placing "Stop" signs with limit lines on Milky Way Drive at Asteroid Way. -1- FISCAL IMPACT: 2 "Stop" Signs with Limit Lines at $150 each -- $300 ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution 95- 2. Location Map RESOLIYrION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABI.I.~HING "STOP~ SIGNS The City Council of the City of Temecula does resolve, determine and order as follows: Section 1. Pursuant to Section 10.12.100 of the Municipal Code, the following 'STOP* sign locations are hereby established in the City of Temecula. A. Westbound Milk7 Way Drive O Asteroid Way B. Eastbound Milky Way Drive O Asteroid Way Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOFr!~, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 23rd day of May, 1995. Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor ATTEST: June S. Greek City Clerk [SEAL] -3- r:~t~95XO523~m~Vem ~p~ajl, STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss crrY OF TBMEC'LmA ) I, lune S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 95- was duly and regnlnrly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 23rd day of May, 1995 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: CO~CILI~-~ERS: CO~CILMBMBERS: CO~CILMEMBERS: CO~CILI~ERS: L H .J..,~ ON J ~-~ NO)frl4 ,t 3 ~, ::) 7_ u 0 LO C,~T~O h4 ITEM 13 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL ~ CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICE CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer May 23, 1995 Easement from Tomond Properties Limited for Maintenance of Loop Detectors at Del Rio Road and Front Street RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council accept the easement from Tomond Properties Limited for the maintenance of loop detectors at Del Rio Road and Front Street. BACKGROUND: During the installation of the traffic signal at Front Street and Del Rio Road, vehicle detector loops were installed on private property to provide for vehicular access from that property into the intersection. At that time, no easement was acquired for the loops. Recent inspection of the signal indicated that there is a need for maintenance in the area of the loops, to prevent damage to these loops. Staff requested that an easement be granted for that purpose. Attached document provides for the required easement. FISCAL IMPACT: The cost associated with loop maintenance will be covered by the currently budgeted and future funding for Street Maintenance, Account Number 100-164-601-5402. Solution to current problem will not exceed ~500.00. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Tomond Properties, Limited Easement 2. Legal Description 3. Easement Plat -1- r.%agebl~gS~O623~TOMOND.EASleJF Cas;L-u..sCATE OF A~ANCB OF (Governmere Code SeefloE 27211) THIS IsTOCEkiu,~'thstllm immQ~in nmlpmp~lran~lbyMumnmm daad ~om Tomond Prot~ties, Limitsl Io ~e CITY OF TEMECULA, is he~by aceape~dfor~heimqmmofvest~g~ in ~hs C'a7 of Tsmmda on bealf of~he b City Courtall purmmat W No. 669. Ginross oomms to ~orda~n th~reo~ by its duty authorized Da~d: C'ay o~Temgula By: ICB 21775 E~. 9/30/97 ROAD NAME PROJECT NAME W.O.# THIS INSTit~ IS FOR FOR !~Fr'OpnER*S USE REI'URN TO CrrY TH~BEqE~TOPTH~ 'FEMECTJLAOFFECE etl~lOP~AND 43174BmimaePerkDn (GOV. CODE 6103) TOMOND PROPR'RT~-q. T.TM1Tlk~ grant(s) to the City of Temecula an easement for the maintenance of Traffic Signal Bcluipment including public utility and public services purposes, over, upon, across, and within the real property in the City of Temecula, State of California, described as follows: (Sce attached legal description) Dated: MAY 4, 1995 President: JOHN C. RAYMONI) - ,$~"~ct,ul: THOMAS ~. TOMLINSON LEGAL DESCRIFHON That portion of Parcel 3, Parcel Map No. 21797 in the City of Temecula, as said parcel is shown on the map, filed in Book 150 of Parcel Maps, Pages 99 and 100 thereof, records of Riverside County, State of California and more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the southwest comer of grid Parcel 3, said point being on the easterly line of 100 foot wide Front Street; Thence, easterly along the southerly line of said Parcel 3, South 75° 31' 03" East, a distance of 10.00 feet; Thence, northerly, parallel with the easterly line of said Front Street, North 14° 28' 57" East, a distance of 15.00 feet; Thence, westerly parallel with the south line of said Parcel 3, North 75° 31' 03" West, a distance of 10.00 feet, to a point on the easterly Line of Front Street (100 feet wide); Thence, southerly along the easterly line of Front Street (100 feet wide), South 14° 28' 57" West, 15.00 feet, to the Point of Beginning. See F~rnent Plat attached hereto. / NOT TO SCAY~ CITY OF TEMECULA · EASEMI~NT PLAT BY: ~. uAO l~rc R DATE: H-H-q5 FOR MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC SIGNAL EQUIPMF, NT ITEM 14 APPROVAEy~ CITY ATTORN FINANCE OFFICE CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council City Clerk May 23, 1995 Resolution requesting Inland Empire Postmark Designation RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 95- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING REQUESTING INLAND EMPIRE POSTMARK DESIGNATION BACKGROUND: The Monday Morning Group located in Riverside has been working for some time to effect a change in the postmark affixed to mail sent from Riverside. Currently the postmark is 'San Bernardino'. The Monday Morning Group have requested the cities in Riverside County to join in the effort' by way of adoption of a resolution supporting the change. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution to be considered February 16, 1995 Press Enterorise article. RESOLUTION NO. 95- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA REQUESTING INI2kND EIVIPIRE POSTIVIARK DESIGNATION WIiI~EAS, the Inlnnd P-rllpire has, in the past decade and a half, been one of the fastest growing regions in California and the United States. WHEREAS, the Inland Enlpire is frequen~y and specifically referred to by television and print media. WHE!iR~kS, this media identification of the Inlnnd l~.mpire:has increased in frequency to the point it has become the common designation for the region. WHEREAS, the telephone book designation ~ is curren~y used by 100 businesses and organizations and Inland I~.nlpire by 51 b-~nesses and organi~fions. NOW lq:rF-RF~:ORB BE IT RESOLVED, Section 1. That the City of Temecula respect~xlly requests the U.S. Postal Service approve a postmark designation change from San Bemardino to Inland Em~pire for all mail which is gencrated from the communities in Riverside County that make up the Inland Empire. Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. APPROVED AND ADOFrED, this 23rd day of May, 1995. ATTEST: Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk, CMC [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of T~necula, hereby do certify that ~e foregoing Resolution No. 95- was duly adopted at a r~gular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 9th day of May, 1995 by the following roll call vote: AYES: 0 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 COUNCILIV[I~'IBER~: None COUNCK,-MI~-MBERS: None COUNCILMEMBERS: None June S. Greek, City Clerk, CMC eI , - 'g./i'd 8c~:p'l: ~E,, ii ITEM 15 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPR~ CITY ATTORNEY ' FINANCE OFFICE CITY MANAGER AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning ~'~ May 23, 1995 Planning Application No. PA94-0098, Nicolas Valley Special Study Prepared By: Craig D. Ruiz, Assistant Planner RECOMMENDATION Receive report and direct staff to 'prepare a General Plan Amendment to remove Section IV(D), Special Study Overlay, from the Land Use Element of the General Ran BACKGROUND When the City of Temecula adopted the General Plan, the Nicolas Valley area (see Attachment No. 2) was given a land use designation of Very Low Residential, .2-.4 dwelling units per acre (2 ~ acre lot size). However, prior to the adoption of the General Plan, some Nicolas Valley residents expressed a desire to have an increased residential density. Thus, when the General Plan was adopted, the area was designated as a Special Study Overlay. The overlay designation was intended to allow staff, through the Special Study, to re-examine the carrying capacity of land to determine what the appropriate residential density should be. After preparing the preliminary analysis of the Study Area, staff and the City's consultant held two workshops with the residents of the Valley. The first workshop was held in December of 1994 with approximately 65 residents. Staff presented the preliminary opportunities and constraints analysis, discussed the existing and proposed development for the surrounding areas, and received input from the residents.' The second workshop was held in February of 1995 with approximately 35 residents. Staff provided preliminary information on costs for various levels of street and drainage improvements and discussed various land use alternatives. On March 6, and April 3, 1995, the Study was presented to the Planning Commission. At the conclusion of the April meeting, the Commission voted to recommend to the City Council that no changes be made to the residential density within the Nicolas Valley Study Area. DISCUSSION As a result of the analysis performed by the City's consultant, it is staff's opinion that the Nicolas Valley area 'could support an increase in land use intensity. The analysis concluded that the primary land use constraints, specifically the lack of infrastructure in the area, could be overcome through a variety of financing mechanisms. While the Study concluded increased residential density was possible, the majority opinion of the participants at the workshops, and those people who have called or written to staff, is to leave the residential density unchanged. It is the desire of the majority of the residents that the rural characteristics of the area be retained. Also, the significant costs to provide the necessary infrastructure to support the increased density was not supported by the area residents. By retaining the 2 ½ acre parcel requirements, the City of Temecula is better able to meet the General Plan Goal of providing a diversity of housing opportunities that satisfy the physical, social and economic needs of existing and future residents. Based upon this input, it is the Commission and staff's recommendation that no changes be made to the Very Low Residential Land Use Designation for the Nicolas Valley. Further,' the Council should direct staff to prepare a General Plan Amendment to delete the Special Study Overlay section {Land Use Element, Section IV(d)} of the General Plan. FISCAL IMPACT The fiscal impact will be limited to the staff time necessary to prepare the General Plan Amendment. Attachments: 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Study Area Map - page 3 Nicolas Valley Special Study - page 4 Planning Commission Staff Report, April 3, 1995 - page 5 Planning Commission Minutes, April 3, 1995 - page 6 Planning Commission Staff Report, March 6, 1995- page 7 Planning Commission Minutes, March 6, 1995 - page 8 R:~T.k~A94..CC 5116195 vl, w 2 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 STUDY AREA MAP --NICOLAS -VAI ,T ,F,Y .... SPECIAl- STUDY Ai~F,A BOUNDARY , A_re~ Indicate Study 'A.rea. BoUndary': ATTACHMENT NO. 2 NICOLAS VALLEY SPECIAL STUDY e-%,STApIrBpy'~IPAN.CC ~/16/9~ ~Te 4 NICOLAS VALLEY SPECIAL STUDY OVERLAY AREA · Draft Report March 2, 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS II. III. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................ INTRODUCTION BACKGROUND B. C. D. E. 3 5 5 Location ...................................... · 5 Existing Setting ................................. Proposed Land Use ................. ". ............. 5 Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan ....................... 7 Area and Subarea Units ............................ 7 IV JURISDICTION ..................................... 10 10 Existing and Proposed Circulation .................... Existing and Proposed Parks and Open Space ............ 12 Existing and Proposed Public Facilities ................. 12 , V. PHYSICAL ........................................ 15 B. C. D. Area 1 ...................................... 15 Area 2 ...................................... 16 17 Area 3 ...................................... 18 Area 4 ...; ................................... VI. ENVIRONMENTAL ................................... B. C. D. 20 20 Area I ...................................... Area 2 ...................................... 20 Area 3 ...................................... 21 Area 4 ...................................... 22 VII. LAND USE ALTERNATIVES ............................ 23 23 Land Use Alternatives ............................ 24 Preliminary Cost Evaluation ........................ VIII. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION ................... EXHIBITS 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Location Map ....................................... 6 Opportunity and Constraints - 1 ........................... 8 Opportunity and Constraints - 2 ................. ; ........ 11 Land Use Alternative A ................................ 27 Land Use Alternative B ................................ 28 Land Use Alternative C ................... : ............. 29+ Land Use Alternatives TABLES 26 II. INTRODUCTION The purpose of this report is to evaluate the issues related TO the future development of Nicolas Valley (herein referred To as the Study Area). The Study Area is presently identified as a Special Study Overlay area in the Temecula General Pin. Such a designation requires a comprehensive, detailed evaluation of the area's development opportunities and constraints. This evaluation will allow The City To further understand the issues that effect the area such that appropriate decisions can be made to determine the future use of the area and to recommend any changes to the General Plan land uses. The General Plan contains the following list of issues to be evaluated: · · · · · · The provision of flood control, sewer, Water and other services; , Impact on surrounding development in terms of traffic, light, noise,' and other impacts; Methods to provide a transition between rural and suburban/urban development; Topography and related visual impacts of development; Existing lot patterns; Traffic circulation and impacts of level of service; Vegetation and wildlife resources; The provision of recreation trails and open space linkages; and Identify a strategy for financing and phasing of infrastructure and other public improvements, This report is divided-into five (5) distinct subjects that will outline the approach utilized to evaluate the issues listed above. The five (5) subjects include: III. Reckqround: This Section is intended to provide the reader with an ove.rview of the Study Area and will act as a framework for understanding the issues which affect the Study Area. IV. Jurisdictionel: This Section will identify the various governmental regulations and proposed projects which affect the use and development of the Study Area. The issues to be discussed include the General Plan Land Use and Circulation, zoning, park and open space areas, bicycle trails, schools and other public facilities. Phvsicah The information in this Section focuses upon the landforms and infrastructure facilities which exist or are proposed, This Section is to be separated into four (4) geographic areas in an effort to group common or like areas together which can then be evaluated based upon a fixed set of issues, This process will occur by comparing the effect of the existing or proposed facilities upon the Study Area's physical environment and rati_.ng it as either low, moderate or high in 3 VI. VII. VIII. sensitivity. The definition of these sensitivity measures are noted in Section III Background. The issues To be discussed in this Section include the Study Area's geography, slopes, landform, parcelization pattern, and road system. Fnvironment~h This Section contains information related to biological and drainage issues which constrain the use of the land. The issues to be discussed include native plant communities, animal habitat and drainage courses. The evaluation criteria will be the same as that noted in Section V Physical. l,~nd Use Alternatives: This Section evaluates potential land use intensities for various portions of the Study Area and estimates a cost distribution for road and drainage facilities. The purpose of this. section is to understand the financial implications of selecting' different development options for the Study' Area. Concltssion and Recommendation: This Section contains a brief summary of the issues presented previously and provides the City with a specific recommendation. 4 III. BACKGROUND A. Location The Nicolas Valley Study Area contains approximately 680 acres and is located in the northeast comer of the City. The Study Area is irregular in shape since it is an outgrowth of adjoining development petterns created by either existing or proposed development. Project boundaries include Butterfield Stage Road on the east and proposed Leon Road along a pertion of the westerly boundary. The northern boundary of the Study Area abuts the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan. The Study Area is bisected by Nicolas Road which runs generally in an east/west direction. (See Exhibit 1:) Existing Setting : The STudy Area is bordered by hills To the north and south and traversed by several drainage courses which merge near Nicolas Road, 'just east of proposed Leon Road. Nicolas Road is fully improved from approximately Winchester Road To proposed Leon Road where it narrows to a two (2) lane paved road between Leon Road and Calle Girasol. Nicolas Road easterly of Calle Girasol is a two (2) lane graded dirt roadway. Butterfield Stage Road and Calle Medusa are also graded dirt roads within the Study Area. The Study Area Can be characterized as rural in nature based upon the existence of large lots, horse corrals, dirt or graded dirt streets, and the lack of public improvements. C. Proposed Land Use St, ,dy Area: The Study Area is currently designated VL (Very Low, .2 to .4 dwelling units per acre) on the City General Plan Land Use Map. It is also a Special Study Overlay area, as noted in the General Plan text. The property is zoned R-R-1 and 2½ (Rural Residential, I and 2½ acre minimum lot sizes); R-1-1 (One Family Dwellings, 1 acre minimum lot size); and R-A-2½ (Residential Agricuitur. e, 2½ acre minimum lot size.) Adjpcent I ands: The Study Area borders a variety of General Plan Land Use designations: RH (Hillside, 0 to .1 dwelling units per acre); L (Low, .5 to 2 dwelling units per acre); LM (Low Medium, 3 to 6 dwelling units per acre); and OS (Open Space). 5 ·-NICOLAS -VA Y ,I ,l~,y .... SPECIAl- S'I'~DY AREA BOUNDARY Adjacent City zoning is R-A-5 (Residential-Agriculture, 5 acre minimum lot size); R-1 (One Family Dwellings), R-T (Mobilehome Subdivision and Mobilehome Park); and the Roripaugh 800 Specific Plan. Roripaugh inch Specific Plan The I~ripaugh Specffic Plan is approximately 790 acres in size and is proposed to contain 2,370 units. It includes 160 acres within the City limits with the balance in the unincorporated County area..The project is proposed to improve Butterfield Stage Road to an Urban Arterial (134 foot right-of-way) or Arterial Highway (110 foot right-of- way) depending upon its location. Several Secondary Streets (88 foot right-of-way) and a Principal Collector (78 foot right-of-way) are proposed within the project and will intersect with Butterfield Stage Road ad|acent the Study Area boundary. The land uses proposed within the Specific Plan adjacent to the easterly end of the Study Area include commercial, residential, park, middle school, and open space. The northern portion is proposed for commercial and residential uses, although both are to be separated from the Study Area by an open space buffer. Area and Subarea UnITs Research within the Study Area has been divided into a series of geographical areas. Sections V and VI of this report contain a discussion of the physical and environmental issues associated with four (4) distinct areas (See Exhibit 2). Each area boundary was formed based upon a significant identifiable feature, such as the hills or the location of the flood plain. Section VII contains land use alternatives which further divide the Study Area into smaller subareas. These subareas reflect potential development areas or units. Due To the separate function of each area and subarM analysis,-the boundaries of each are not intended to be coterminous. The overall objective of dividing the Study Area into smaller components is an attempt to more easily define the relevant issues which affect the Study Area and weigh their level of importance.; The evaluation criteria for the physical and environmental issues contained in the four (4) major geographical areas are based upon the following scale: 7 / / /- / -/ 11 · iow Sensitiviw: An issue affac~s either a minimal amount of land or is not significant with respec~ to maintaining the integrity or composition of a facility/or resource. Medi,jm Sensitivity: An issue effects either a sizeable area of land or could adversely effect the integrity or composition of a facility or resource. High Sensitivity: An issue will effect a significant amount of land or will adversely effect the integrity or composition of a facility or resource. 9 IV. JURISDICTIONAL A number of issues affect the Study Area which are either regulated by the City of Ternecula or maintained by other local agencies. Although these regulations maybe unseen by a member of the public, they have a significant effect upon the potential use of property. A. Existing and PropoSed Circulation The Study Area is currently traversed by the following identifiable roadways: O · O O O O O · Nicolas Road - 2-lane graded dirt road Butterfield Stage Road - Graded dirt road Calla Medusa - 2-lane paved road : Calla Girasol - Graded dirt/paved road' Walcott Road - 2-lane graded dirt road Calle Chapos - Graded dirt road Riverton Lane- 2-lane paved road Liefar Road - 2-lane graded dirt road A number of addition streets are noted on Assessor's Map pages but not recognizable in the field. These streets provide access to individual parcels within the Study Area. Although some of these streets are dedicated to the City the balance are private roads and are identified as a lettered lot on the County Assessor maps. The private roads have been offered for dedication but not accepted by the City for maintenance. Various circulation improvements are identified for the Study Area and contained in the City General Plan Circulation Element. These circulation improvements include the following (See Exhibit 3): Butterfield Staae Road: This roadway is to be a 6-lane Urban Arterial (134 foot right-of-way).' The westerly one-half of Butterfield Stage Road, south of Calle Chapos, has been dedicated to the City at a half-width right-of-way of 55 feet. Additional dedication of land will be required to meet tkie General Plan requirement. Nicelee Ro,,d: This roadway is to be a d-lane Arterial Highway (110 foot right-of-way) with a raised landscape median. Within the street right-of-way is to be included a Class II or III bicycle lane. Nicelee Road, east of proposed Leon Road, is primarily a non-dedicated roadway. The balance of the roadway is noted as a separate lettered lot on the County 10 Assessor maps and has been offered for dedication to the City but not accepted for maintenance. leon Rned: This roadway is proposed to be · Secondary Highway (88 foot right-of-way). No portion of this roadway has been dedicated to the City at this time. cell. ~iresolleelle Chenos/Welcott I erie: These streets have been identified on the City General Plan Circulation Element as a 2-lane Principal Collector (78 foot right-of-way). In *the Spring of 1995, the City intends to construct road improvements on these streets to provide for two (2) lanes of traffic within 32 feet of paving. The improvements will extend from La Serene Way to Nicolas Road. Ricvcle Facilities: In addition to the 'bicycle lane described above, a Class I bicycle lane is also proposed north of Nicolas Road. This facility would be separate from Nicolas Road and located outside of the street right-of-way. Existing and Proposed Parks and Open Space No parks or open space areas exist or are proposed within the Study Area. However, existing Riverton Park and a number of proposed parks and open space areas are planned in the areas immediately beyond the Study Area boundary. The park and open space areas noted on the City's General Plan north of the Study Area overlap those planned for the Roripaugh Specific Plan. The drainage courses in the Roripaugh Specific Plan, which ultimately extend into the Study Area, have been identified as open space with the intent of preserving their drainage and biological characteristics. The City collects park' development fees for the purpose of developing new parks or rehabilitating existing ones. Although no parks are proposed in the Study Area, development fees provide a mechanism for new development in the Study Area to pay their proportional share of new park facilities. Existing end Proposed Public Facilities No schools exist or are proposed within the Study Area. However, one elementary school exists to the northwest of the Study Area and several schools are proposed within the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan. The Roripaugh Plan includes both a K-8th grade school and a middle school. As was noted above for park facilities, each new development is assessed school fees for the purpose of paying their proportional share of new sch=ool facilities. These facilities may be 12 located beyond the immediate geographic area of individual development projects. A number of infrastructure improvements are proposed and include the following: Flectrical: A 115 volt electrical line is proposed along the westerly edge of the Study Area. Fxisting Sewer: No sewer lines exist within the Study Area. Prooosed SeWer: Two (2) sewer lines are proposed through the Study Area~ e e An 18-inch line is proposed along the southerly side of Nicolas Road extending easterly through the Study Area, to Calla Girasol. At this point the line size decreases to 15-inches and continues easterly through the Study Area into the Roripaugh Specific Plan. A 12-inch line is proposed to branch off of the 18-inch line (described above) just easterly of the intersection of Nicolas Road and Calla Girasol. The 12-inch line will run parallel with Calla Girasol until it intersects with Calla Chapos, where it will extend easterly until it terminates at the intersection of Calle Chapos and Walcott Road. FXiSting Water: A water well owned and operated by the Rancho California Water District exists just north of the intersection of Nicolas Road and Calle Girasol. Water lines exist in the .following locations: e e e -e An 8-inch line in Liefar Road. An 8-inch line along the north side of. Nicolas Road extending from the San Diego Aqueduct westerly to a point just west of the intersection section of Calla Girasol and Nicolas Road. This line intersects with the Liefar Road line· An 8-inch line extending southerly and easterly from tl~e 8-inch line in Nicolas Road along the east side of Calle Girasol and the north side of Calla Chapos to a point just east of the intersection of Walcott Road and Calla Chapos. A .12-inch line in Calle Medusa, which extends south of its intersection with the extension Nicolas Road. This line connects to the 8-inch line in Liefer Road. 13 PrODOSed Weter: A number of water lines are proposed in the Study Area. A 48-inch line is proposed through the length of the Study Area along the southerly side of Nicolas Road. Intersecting this line just east of Butterfield Stage Road, is-a proposed 16-inch line extending north and south of Nicolas Road. An additional 30-inch water line is proposed to connect to the existing 8-inch line which parallels Calle Girasol and Calle Chapos. The line will run south along Walcott road and north along the San Diego Aqueduct. 14 PHYSICAL The Study Area has been divided into four (4) primary areas for purposes of evaluating specific *site issues. The boundaries of each area were determined by establishing a geographic boundary which reflected similar land uses, geography, drainage features or other significant environmental characteristics. Area 1 ~eonrAnhy Area I is in the Southwest Quadrant of the Study Area and is primarily characterized as hillside area. This Area is geographically homogeneous due to the ridgeline which forms a spine and traverse' the property from the east to west. Slones Slopes in the area are averaging approximately 17 percent and range between 5 percent and 30 percent. This area borders the flood plain created through the convergence of the many drainage courses which enter the Study Area from the east. Perceli~mtion Pettern The parcelization pattern is fairly uniform with respect to size throughout the area although some parcel configurations have narrow widths when compared to their depth. RoAd Svstem This area includes only a portion of Nicolas Road and Calle Medusa. Only a small portion of these roads are improved. Nicolas Road is the only General Plan Circulation roadway within the area. t Andform The most significant. physical feature is the gently sloping ridge which generally divides the area in half from east to west. The high points which create the ridge characteristics are not significant within the context of the topographic configuration of the entire Study Area. However, the ridge does help to divert some local drainage around the Study Area to avoid further impacting the Study Area's drainage problems. Sensitivity MeAsure Due to the moderate scale of the araa's topography and the fact it could have soma effect upon the developmant of the area, the physical issues in this area would rate as moderate on the sensitivity scale. Area 2 tl-eogrAnhv The boundaries of this area were derived from the configuration of the Valley floor, which is primarily eftacted by the storm water drainage course which traverses the Study Area generally along the .. alignmant of Nicolas Road, This floodplain is probably the most' significant and defining feature .within the entire Study Area. The floodplain boundary is also the location of numerous master planned physical improvements identified in Section II Background, including Nicolas Road, portions of Leon Road and Butterfield Stage Road, a Class I bicycle lane and proposed water and sewer lines. Slones/I Andform The combination of the proposed improvements discussed above are reflective of the physical characteristics embodied in the fact this area is a floodplain and relatively flat. As a low-lying area it is subject to receiving stormwater run-off from tributary areas. In addition, a low point is the logical location for the placement of facilities, such as sewer lines, which are designed based upon achieving a gravity. flow. The location of the road also reflects the path of least resistance to traverse for man and vehicles. PArcelization Pattern' The subdivision pattern abutting Nicolas Road reflects an intent to use the street as the primary access for existing parcels, The planned road improvements and the installation of a bicycle lane could significantly affect the use of these properties, In addition, th~ intent of designating Nicolas Road a 4-lane Arterial Highway is to provide a major east-west circulation link designed to carry a significant number of vehicles through this portion of the City. Allowing individual lots to maintain access to Nicolas Road would severely hamper its effectiveness to achieve this goal.. Road System Nicolas Road is the primary roadway within the Study Area and acts as a spine from which other portions of the Study Area can be accessed. Roadways within this area are primarily graded dirt roads. Proposed master planned streetS in the area include Nicolas Road, a small portion of Calle Girasol branching south of Nicolas Road and a portion of Butterfield Stage Road which abuts the Study Area boundary. · -~ensitivitv Mees-re Due to the significant effect of the proposed improvements upon The areas existing subdivision pattern and storm water drainage courses, the existing physical issues in this area would rate high on the' sensitivity scale. Area 3 ~eorirenhv Area 3 consists of the most northerly portion of the Study Area and abuts the Roripaugh Specific Plan to the norfh and east. This area also contains the greatest amount of development within the Study Area. SIODeSll endform The topographic configuration of this area consists of an irregular sloping terrain which descends to the south. Slopes within the area range between 10 and 15 percent. Isolated high points exist but are not significant in 'respect to the amount of land they encompass or thei~ height. The subdivision pattern has attempted to make the greatest use of these high points by subdividing around them and incorporating them into. individual lots. PerceliTetion Pettern The' subdivision pattern within this area is uniformly irregular except for some of the parcels located north of Liefer Road. Some of the parcels in this area do not have access to a public street. This may not be a significant concern, however, since private streets, denoted as a lettered lot on the County Assessor maps, have been approved securing them access to public streets. De Road Svstem Liefer Road is the only existing public street in the area. Development within the area must obtain access from Liefar Road. Sensitivity Measure The topographic configuration in this area is not as dramatic as that contained within Area 4. As such, the hillside area is more suited to development than .Are 4. Slopes within'this area are moderately steep. However, they do not prohibit development, as evidenced by the current number of homes. No other significant physical issues exist which constrain development, such as-a drainage course or flood plain. Due to these factors the effect of existing physical issues in this area would rate as moderate on the sensitivity scale. Area 4 r-eOgr-Ohv/SlOoeS Area 4 is located in the southeasterly portion of the Study Area. This area offers the greatest topographic variety within the' Study Area since it does include a relatively flat portion of land north of Calle Chapos which transitions into moderately step terrain as one progresses south. I andforms Within the overell setting of the Study Area the low lying area north of Calle Chapos represents a Terrace or bench which sits above the actual floodplain area (Subarea 2). The high points within this area represent the highest elevations within the entire Study Area. P-rceliTAtion Pattern This area contains the' most irregular shaped parcels within the Study Area. The number of "flag lots" are reflective of the area's terrain. Road System This area is traversed by a number of existing roadways. Several master planned streets are also planned in the area including Butterfield Stage Road and Call. Girasol!Calle Chapos/Walcott Lane which are grouped in the City General Plan as a Principle Collector Street and therefore would be the same width. Road improvements within this area would be expensive due to the existing Topography. Existing drainage courses which Traverse the roadways will also 18 require improvement. The combination of Calle Girasol/Calle Chapos/Walcott Lane is to be improved to an interim condition consisting .of a 2-lane 'roadway within 32 feet of paving. Construction is schedule to start in the Spring of 1995. Sensitivity Measure This area represents the greatest change in topographic elevation in the Study Area. The level-of improvements necessary for both existing and proposed roads are also probably the most extensive, based upon the length of the roadways. Due to these factors the physical issues affecting development in this area would be rated as high on the sensitivity scale. VI. ENVIRONMENTAL The previous section identified physical issues related to each primary geographic area of the Study Area. The purpose of this section is to focus upon and identify those environmantel issues which are significant within each Subarea, A. Area I r-nnerel CharActer This area is the entry point tO the Study Area and was formed as a remainder area created by the residential development to the southeast, the floodplain to the north and the project boundary to the. south. As such, the predominate feature of. this area is the sloping hillside ridge which slices through the area.* Riological Resources The most significant environmental component of this area is the location of a small Coastal Sage-Scrub community located just to the west of Calle Medusa. It is unknown at this time whether any threatened or endangered species exist in this area. nreina(~e Characteristics As noted in the previous discussion on physical issues, the topographic configuration of the hillsides helps to divert drainage around the Study Area. This drainage course is only partially within the Study Area and does not possess significant environmental attributes. Sensitivity Measure Due to the isolated location of the Coastal Sage-Scrub, the relatively minimal site area it effects, and the lack of other environmental factors, the environmental issues within this area Would rate low on the sensitivity scale, B. Area 2 ~eneml Character The southerly boundary of this area generally borders the floodplain while the northerly portion primarily reflects a transition in grade (grade break) from the flat valley floor to the sloping hillsides. Biological Reso-rces/nrainage ChRrActeristics The moat significant environmental feature of this area is the drainage course-outlined by the flood plain boundary. The drainage course is comprised of two (2) blue line streams which not only signify significant drainage courses but also the potential existence of various biological resources such as plants and trees or animals which use the vegatation for habitat. It is unknown at this time whether any threatened or endangered species exist in this Subarea. .qensitivitv MeAsure The moat significant environmental factor within the Study Area is the flood plain and its associated environmental attributes, which can; act as a life source,for plants and a resulting habitat for animals. In addition, the floodplain represents both a significant danger to development and a significant cost tO overcome. Due to these environmental factors, the environmental issues within this area would rate high on the sensitivity scale. Are 3 ~ Reneral Ch;rActer The easterly boundary of this area is formed by the City limits with the northerly boundary abutting the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan. The area contains a fairly irregular slope pattern. Riolor)ical Resources The moat significant environmental aspect of this area is the extensive amount of land 'covered by Coastal Sage-Scrub which occurs primarily within the north half of the area. In addition, the Coaatal Sage-Scrub overlaps an area located at the northwest corner of the area-that has been identified as having the potential for paleontaological (pre-historic) resources. .. nreineqe ChArecteristics The topographic configuration of the area has created several notable drainage courses' through the area. These drainage courses are not identified as blue line streams on the U.S.G.S. map and therefore do not .represent the same. level of stormwater run-off or potential vegetation as other .drainage areas within Study Area. 21 Sensitiviw Measure Due to the extensive existence of Coastal Sage-Scrub, the potential existence of paleontological artifacta, and drainage concerns, the environmental issues within this area would rate as moderate on the sensitivity scale. Area 4 r-ener-I character This area is reflective of many features within the Study Area in that it contains flat land as well as relatively steep slopes. Since Area 4 represents an area with both floodplain and hillside characteristics, it. is appropriate that it contain attributes found in both. Riologic-I Reso-rces That.portion of the area south of Calle Chapos and primarily east of Walcott Road contains a fairly large geographical area with Coastal Sage-Scrub. It is unknown whether any threatened or endangered species exist in this area, Drainage CharaCteristics That portion of the area north of Calle Chapos comains a blue line stream which represents the drainage course which traverses the area and connects-to the .defined floodplain along Nicolas Road to the north. The blue line stream is parallel to or within the same alignment as Calla Chapos. SensitiVity Measure The significance of drainage issues and the designation of blue line streams have been previously noted. Due to these and the other environmental factors. noted, the environmental issues within this area would rate as high on the sensitivity scale. VII. LAND USE ALTERNATIVES For the purposes of evaluating land use intensities within the Study Area, a series of 13 Subareas have been formed. Each Subarea is geographically distinct due'to its unique characteristics, such as major roadways, parcel configurations or/and .Study Area limitations. To help understand the relationship between the previous four (4) geographic areas rapresented in the opportunities and constraints analysis and the new Subareas, please refer to the following comparison: Opportunity and Constraint Areas Area I Area 2 Area 3 Area 4 Land Use Ntemative Subareas I, J, and portions of F and G H and portions of C, D, E, F and G A, B and portions of D and E K, L, M and a portion of J The combination of various physical and environmental issues, including the influence of potential development, warranted this reconfiguration and further analysis of the study area. A. Land Use Altamatives - The approach to evaluating various land use intensities is based upon the previously compietad opportunity and constraints analysis and a further analysis of potential access alignments throughout the Study Area. The delineation of each land use alternative is sensitive to the issues raised in those previous sections. Four (4) different residential' parcel sizes 'have been utilized in developing each land use alternative starting with the existing zoning of R-R 2 1/2 acre minimum, and transitioning to R-R I acre minimum, R-R 1/2 acre minimum, and R-R 1/4 acre minimum lot sizes. Starting with a existing base of 260 allowable units for the area (based upon the existing zoning), Alternatives A,' B, and C would intensify the total lot countto 742 lots, 9x-4- lots, and 1888 lots, respectively (see Table I and Exhibits 4, 5 and 6). The three alternative land use intensities were chosen in order to generate varying unit counts within the Study Area: The goal of generating these 'alternative intensities is to establish a method of distributing the cost of road and storm drain improvements for the Study Area among the existing and/or future residents and .to identify those dollar values: As part ofthis analysis existing and future improvement programs for the Study Area were also evaluated. This includes the future disposition of the Roripaugh Specific Plan, which boarders Nicolas Valley to the north and east, as well as the character of the existing surrounding land uses. Preliminary Cost Evaluation '- NBS/Lowry approached the cost analysis as a preliminary means of evaluating the relative costs of required infrastructure. The major infrastructure elements considered in the cost analysis included the major roads and drainage facilities required by the City of Temecula General Plan and necessary to provide for the health, safety and welfare of the local community. The roads included a half section of .. Nicolas Road, a half section of Butterfield Stage Road, a half section' of Leon Road, and a full section of Liefar Road. The drainage improvereacts included in the analysis were the (3) three blue line streams which traverse the property from east to west, as well as a half portion of the bridge necessary for a crossing near the intersection of Nicolas Road and Calle Girasol. Three (3) different types of channels were considered for evaluation; 'a naturalized channel, a dirt sided trapezoidal channel, and a concrete sided trapezoidal channel. Each type of channel has significant cost and land area implications. The principle difference in design is between the trapezoidal channel and the naturalized channel. Examples of the designs-are evident in both the Study Area and adjoining properties. The Study Area has an improved concretelriprap sided trapezoidal channel along the north side of Nicolas Road at the southwesterly entrance to the Study Area. The proposed Roripaugh Specific Plan, located easterly and upstream of the Study Area, proposes the use of naturalized channels for each of the existing blue line streams. The Temecula General Plan also included a Class I bicycle trail along the north side of Nicolas Road which could be aligned with the existing drainage course or proposed drainage facilities. Due to the potential dual functions of these 'channels it Was deemed appropriatb to include more Than one type of channel improvement cost. 24 The relative costs of these improvements and their associated cost allocation would range as follows:' IIm · Roadway costs would generally vary between 6300.00 and $800.00 per unit per annualized assessment. Drainage costs would generally vary between $100.00 and ~1,300.00 per acre .per annualized assessment depending upon the type of channel design selected. Thee costs are preliminary in nature and are only intended to identify potential improvement costs such that property owners and decision- makers will have a general understanding of the implications of different land use decisions. These ;do not represent preliminary engineering studies for assessment district purposes. NICOLAS VALLEY LAND USE ALTERNATIVE LEGENDS 88.0 2 I j2 36.0 1.0 36 30.0 1/2 21.0 1/2 42 72.0 1]'2 144 40.0 1/2 16.0 1/2 32 80.0 1/'2 160 79.0 1.0 79 20.0 2 1/2 8 55.0 2 1/2 32 78.0 2 1/2 31 34.0 2 1/2 13 ~9.0 ~2 ALTI~RNATIVE I A~-, ~ n~ty n.u.', II~ ~ A ~0 L0 ~ A ~0 B ~0 ~ ~ B ~0 C ~0 ~ ~ C ~ D 21.0 1~ ~ D 21.0 ~ ~0 ~ 1~ E ~0 F ~ ~ ~ F ~0 G 1~0 la ~ O 1~ H ~ ~ 1~ H ~0 J 2~0 1~ ~ J ~.0 K ~.0 1.0 ~ ~ ~.0 L 7&0 1.0 ~ L ~0 M ~.0 1~ ~ M ~.0 i s s TABLK I VIII. CONCLUSION The purpose of this study was to undertake an additional level of analysis, beyond that recently completed for the new General Plan, to define the area's future land use. The current General Plan Land Use designation for the Study Area is VL (Very Low Density, .2 to .4 units per acre). A variety of goals, objectives, and policies am contained in the City's General Plan which currently have an affect upon the use of land within the Study Area. Howaver, the City felt the unique attributes of the Study Area warranted further analysis prior to assigning a mere appropriate land use designation. The Study Area is affected by a broad range of issues due to its location, current use, and adjacent uses. The documentation contained in the previous sections has identified those issues in an effort to gain a greater understanding of the area. Although some :potentially significant' environmental issues exist, such as drainage and topography, they do not represent constraints severe enough to restrain development to a level less than the adjoining residential areas. In addition, several workshops have been held with area residents to obtain their input on the potential use of the area. The majority of residents in attendance st the meetings expressed a desire that the level of development allowed within the Study Area remain at or near the level currently permitted. The latter 'portion of the report contained development intensity and improvement cost information in an effort to link the improvements required by the General Plan and/or new development to the ability to pay for the cost of construction. If the City is to further the circulation and associated drainage improvements specified in the Temecula General Plan, a proportional level of development will need to occur which can bear the financial burden of paying for. the cost of construction. The cost will generally lessen for more intensive development due to the ability to spread the cost'over a greater number of people and/or the property owners will realize a greater value and potential profit for their land. Recommendation Due to the intensification of the land surrounding the Study Area and the need to maintain the goals, objectives and policies of City's General Plan, it is recommended: .1. The Planning Commission recommend to the City Council that the Nicolas Valley Study Area be allowed to intensify to permit lots 1/4 acre and larger, consistent with Land Use Alternative C. 30 ATTACHMENT NO. 3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT APRIL 3, 1995 R:*SSTAPPR.R'~MPAN.CC 5/16~ vie 5 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: MEMORANDUM Planning Commission Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning~''~'' March 6, 1995 Planning Application No. PA94-0098, The Nicolas Valley Special Study Prepared by: Craig D. Ruiz, Assistant Planner RECOMMENDATION: 1. Rr-P-OMMFND that the City Council Receive the Special' Study Report and that no Change be Made to the Land Use Designation within the Study Area BACKGROUND The Nicolas Valley is located in the northeasterly limits of the City. The area boundary is roughly Joseph Road in the west, Butterfield Stage Road in the east, approximately 1000 feet north of Liefer Road in the north and the northern edge of the Tierra Brisas and Pavilion Home developments to the south. The Nicolas Valley Study area consists primarily of 2 ½ acres parcels, consistent with the zoning for the area. The Study Area is approximately 650 acres in size, with approximately 150 individual property owners and 240 individual parcels. Over the past few years, there has been "typical" single family home development (one family homes, 7,200 square foot parcels) to the West and South of' the study area. In addition, there is similar single family development proposed for the areas to the North and East (Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan and Johnson Ranch Specific Plan). When the City of Temecula adopted the' General Plan, Nicolas Valley was given a land use designation of Very Low Residential, .2-.4 dwelling units par acre. However, prior to the adoption of the General Plan, some Nicolas Valley residents expressed a desire to have a higher density land use designation for the area. Thus, when the General Plan was adopted, the area was designated as a Special Study Overlay. The overlay designation was intended to allow staff to re-examine the carrying capacity of land to determine what the appropriate land use designation should be. Ultimately, the study was intended to provide a framework for future development of the Valley. Should the study determine that an increased land use intensity is appropriate, staff would then initiate a General Plan Amendment. In March of 1994, the Planning Department issued five Requests-for-Proposal (RFP) to planning firms in the Temecula area. In response, the City received three proposals. After a preliminary screening of the proposals by staff, a consultant selection committee was established. The committed was comprised of the Director of Public Works, Director of Planning, and the Senior Planner. Base upon the committee's recommendation, the City R:Wr;~Ii*AN.K:: 3/2/~ klb ' 1_ ' Council awarded a professional services contract to the consulting firm of NBS Lowry in October of 1994. DISCUSSION In analyzing the carrying capacity of the Valley, the study area was divided into 4 major sub- areas (See Attachment No. 2). Sub-areas were identified by way of major road divisions, distinct topography, or parcel and study area limitations. The sub-areas were created to allow a grouping of common areas together which can then be evaluated based upon a fixed set of issues. The sub-areas are: Area I in the southwest quadrant of the study area; Area 2 is located along the Valley floor; Area 3 is the northerly portion of the study area; and Area 4 is located in the southeasterly portion of the study area. The first major task of the Study was for the consultant to develop the Opportunities and Constraints Analysis {OCA). The OCA examines such issues as: land use density, traffic and: road improvements, drainage improvements, sewer and water improvements, and the impacts' of surrounding development. Each issue was evaluated to determine, as the name implies, where development may or may not be suitable (See Attachment "4"). Once the OCA was complete, the next step was to develop land use alternatives. The consultant and staff then developed four land use alternatives (See Attachment "4, Exhibit 2'). Alternative 'A" proposes ½ acre development along the valley floor and 2½ acre development in the north and south hill side areas. This alternative would potentially allow 742 dwelling units. Alternative "B' would allow ½ acre development along the valley floor and I acre development in the north and south hill side areas. This alternative would potentially allow 944 dwelling units. Alternative "C" would allow ¼ acre development along the valley floor and ½ acre development in the north and south hill side areas. This alternative would potentially allow for 1888 dwelling units. Alternative "D' would be no change to the existing land use designation. In addition to the above tasks, a goal of the Study was to discuss what the residents of the Valley envisioned for the future of this area. To this end, staff held two public workshops with area residents. The first meeting was held in December of 1994 and was attended by approximately 65 people. At this meeting, staff and the City's consultant presented the preliminary opportunities and constraints analysis and discussed the existing and proposed development for the surrounding areas. At the conclusion of the workshop, staff took an informal poll of the meeting attendees to assess the residents views on future land use designations. Staff determined that approximately 1/3 of the attendees wanted no change to the land use designation, 1/3 would consider "some" increased land use designation and 113 were undecided, pending further information. A second workshop was held in February of 1995 which was attended by approximately 35 people. The second meeting further discussed the opportunities and constraints of the area and discussed various land use alternatives. In addition, staff provided preliminary information on costs for various levels of street and drainage improvements. Specifically, rough cost estimates were provided to construct half-street improvements to the circulation element roads within the study area and for drainage improvements to Santa Gertrudis Creek. Staff stated that if there were no increases in land use designations, or no funding mechanisms were identified to provide the above improvements, the roads would continued to be unimproved It:WrAPLeLsTWlPAN.PC 3/2/95 1~ 2 ' and the drainage problems would continue. At the conclusion of this meeting, the overwhelming majority of attsndees were opposed to any increase in land use intensity. As presented at the workshops, the OCA determined that even the most constrained areas, the hillside portion of Areas 1,3 and 4, could absorb increased land use intensity. Typically, parcels of a half-acre or greater do not require sewer improvements. Therefore, any land use intensity greater than 2 dwelling units per acre would not require the installation of sewer lines. As for street improvements, all subdivisions require half-section street improvements. In addition, subdivisions of one-acre or less would require additional paved access to the nearest publicly maintained street (Subdivision Ordinance No. 460). Finally, drainage improvements would be dependant upon each developments impact and proximity to a particular drainage course. As an addition note, in 1994, the Department of Public Works conducted two mail surveys of the residents in the area of Uefer Road. The purpose of the surveys were to determine if: the residents of the area were interested in forming an assessment district for purpose of' improving Uefer Road. The majority of the respondents indicated 'they did not wish to form an assessment district. CONCLUSION The Special Study has determined that the Nicolas Valley could support an increase in land use intensity. However, the anticipated cost associated with any increase in land use intensity greater than one dwelling unit per acre would make such an increase cost prohibitive at this time. Therefore, the alternative would be to allow for a density of one dwelling unit per acre. In contrast, it is clearly the opinion of the majority of the Valley residents (those who have contacted staff) that they do not support any increases in land use intensity. While this opinion may represent a minority of the overall total number of land owners within the study area, staff considers their input to be significant. Therefore, based upon the input of the area residents, it is staff's recommendation that the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council that the Very Low Residential Land Use Designation for the Nicolas Valley remain unchanged. Attachments: 2. 3. 4. 5. Study Area Map - Blue Page 4 General Plan Land Use Designations of the Study Area - Blue Page 5 Draft Opportunities and Constraints Analysis - Blue Page 6 Letters Opposing Increases in Land Use Designation - Blue Page 7 Letters Supporting Increases in Land Use Designation - Blue Page 8 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 STUDY AREA MAP ·-NICOLAS -VA ~ ,LF, Y .... SPECIAl, STUDY AREA BOUNI)AllY :: i: LIEFER RD f'l ATTACHMENT NO. 2 GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATIONS OF THE STUDY AREA ATTACHMENT NO. 3 DRAFT OPPORTUNITIES AND CONSTRAINTS ANALYSIS R:~3TAFF!~gaPA94.PC 3~9~ ~ ATTACHMENT NO. 4 LETTERS OPPOSING INCREASE IN LAND USE DESIGNATION RECEIVED ~ / y-/ Craig Ruiz Assistant Planner Planning Department 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590-3606 February 23, 1995 RECEIVED FEB 2 7 B95 Dear Mr. Ruiz: As property owners at the far east end of Nicholas Road within'the city of Temecula, we are writing to express our concerns with items that the Planning Department is considering. We are vary ~,ch against idea of rezoning the area for parcels smaller than two and one-half (2 1/2) acres ~nd the idea of creating an assessment. district to pay for improvements caused by the;rezoning. My wifeand I, both born andraised in the Riverside/SanBernardino area, purchased our property consisting of 3.79 acres in 1976 with the intent of building a residence on it to retire to. Like us, the people who own property on the east end of Nicholas Road are either retiredpersons on fixed incomes or families trying to raise children. Along with all the fees inourredbybeing annexed into the city of Temecula, imposing additional assessments on the property, whether by the parcel or the acre, will either break the backs of these owners or make it veryhard to find a buyer for the property if and when they decide to sell. To be honest with you, our bottom line is 1AAV~ CCsnfOvtAhlA W~h ~h~-2[W'4~th4~g~ Thank you for your consideration in this matter. 7020 Halesworth Court Citrus Heights, CA 95610 (916) 725-6195 February 14, 1~5 TO: FRO/~ Memb~,~foraRumlTemecula (CART) 5~44~ Pala V~ Drive Tss,,~d~ C.A 92591 ATFENTION: Chairnum Ford; Commi,sioners Blair, Fahey, Slaven and Webster Ni~o~ v, dley specdal Study P, eo~u=,,ends,ion I would like to thank you and the city staff fo~ undex~ng the extra effort of orcheSrati~ the special study meetings for the residents d the Nicolss Valley Special Study area. The information was enliXhteninz and valuable. The individuals from the city staff were alwap profe~onal ana courte~ to what could be d~cn'bed ~ a sometimes 'lively' crowd. This is exemplary city government, "of the people, for the people and by the people". All involved should be commenck& I receommend that no chan~ be mael- to the Current Nicohs Valley Ares Zoning. The first study meetinS was attem~ !~y rouXhly 5006 of the property owners. Roughly half were opposed to incre.ea zonin~ aen~y. The second meeting was attemie~ by rouZhly 2096 of the plOp,C, ty owners. RouXhly 8096 were opposed to increased zozdnZ density. A handful of residents were in. favor of dohlg 'something' and this floated along the lines of improvements to drainage and cimzhtion, but not necessarily I believe that there is an overall negative value-~dded associated with increa,~ population dendry in what is now predominately a 2 1/2 acre minimum parcel ares. The followin~ are perceived to be the negatives associated with an increase in zoning density and are contrary to the 'hiShe~ and best use' of the Nieolas Valley area: , Decreased quality d current rural lifestyle In~mexi vehicular and pedestrian traffic Increased local population density and crime Negative impact for safe eque~;--htn usage Further eradication of an unlisted enaan~red species: The 'Rural Temecuhn Resiaenf Nicolas Valley Special Study Recommendation PaSe 2 I can find no clear overridinZ positive aspects, (either financially, culturally or quality of life enhancing) to the pi~possl to change the existing zoning.from R-R-2 1/2. I located to Temecula, specifically in the Nicohs Valley area, to enjoy the riches of the rural lifestyle. I do not desire, nor can I afford, the costs associated with improvements, _-_-_-~-_-_-ments, etc. which are directly linked to increased density. In this reSarcl I would be poorer in more ways than one. I am not a developer, but am a homeowner residinz in the immediate neiZhborhoocis of the Nicohs Valley Specisl Study and my lifestyles are directly impacted by the results and recommendations that this process will produce. I intend to be represented when the study recommendations are brought before the PhnninZ Commitsion and subsequen~y the City Council. I would like this letter to'be plEed on record as beinS in opposition to zonin8 density increases when the hearinS is conductecL Additionally, I would like to extend my 8ratitude to the you and the commission members for recognizing the residents who voiced their opposition to the Johnson Ranch high density residential p~,posal. I believe that Temecula is fully capable of becominz an attractive mix of rural residential units coupled with a balance of liZht opportunity for prospc,-iLy, self-reliance and rural charisma second to none. It can establish itself as a shining example for others on how to mature as a community without the ills sffilisted with high density residential development which have Please continue to maintain a cluestionh~ attitude regarding the merit of high density residential growth Fx~ingd by land developers, especially in the Johnson and Roripaugh projects which impact my immediate area. I am a member of a growing population of local rural residents who stand in opposition to the intense residential development of rural Temecula and its current spheres of influence. We are collectively known as CaRT - C. adition for a Rural Temecula. Use my voice to communicate to the representatives of these projects that we believe in adding greater value to Temecula through less-dense, rural-residential development. RECEIVED FEB2 ? 1995 February 14, 1995 TO: FROM: The City of Temecula Temecula Planning Commiuion 45174BuaineasParkDdve Tcmecula, CA 92590 Mendzn, Coalition fora Rnral Temecula(CaRT) 39140 Pala Vista Drive Temecu]a, CA 92591 ATTENTION: stn3jK-r.. Ominnan Fo~-d; Comrais~ior~, Blair, Fahey, Slaven and Webst~ Nicx~ vaney Spe~ Study ~onune~ We would li~ ~ thank you andthe city staff for ~ the extra effort d people". All involved should be connn~na~L We r~xnmnend i no chsn~ b~ made dcnaity. A handful of residents were in favor of doing ' something and this fiea!~ along We believe that there is an overall negative value-added assoeia~ with increased population ~ in what is now pmtmnins~ly a 2 1/2 acre minimum pazcelm The following are perceived to be the ~associa~ with an increase in zoning density and are contrary to the 'highest and best uae' ofthe Nicolas Valley area: Decreasedqual~d~rtmdlife~le Inereasedvehicularandpedemiantnt~ Increased local population density and crime Negat~ impact for safe equemian unSg Further er,.alcstion d an ~ endanSered ~ixci~: The 'Rural Temeculan Resident' Nicolas Valley Study Recommendslion Page 2 We can fred no clear overriding pmitive aspect, (either financially, culturally or quality d life enlmncin$) tothe pwpmal to change ~he existi~ zonin~ from R-R-2 1/2. We loca~l ~o Temecula, spec~ic~lly in ~he Nicolas Valley area, to enjoy the riches d hhe rural lifestyle. more ways hhan one. We are not developers, but are homeowners ~ in the immediate neighborhoods d the Nicolas Valley Special Study and our ~ are directly impacl~ by the results avxi recommendations that this plxx:t~ w~l l:wochwe. We intend to be/tpl~sented when the study rtcommenda~iom are bwu~ before the Phtud~ Commisdon and subsequently the City Council. We would like this letter tobe Placed on record as beinZ in~to Additionally, we wmald like to extend our gratitude to the you and the commism'cm members for rewgnizing the residents who voiced their oppc,~l,~n to the Johnson Ranch hiZh density residential pxoposaL We believe that Tentec, ula is fuIly capable of becoming an ~,~-~tive mix dmral r=idential ~ coupled with aimlance dliSl~ indusWial tEsperity, self-w, lhn~ and rural c~ second to none. It can establish itself as a shining example for others on how to mature as a community withou~ the ills sf611-~e~ with l~h ~ resiaential development which have ~ Southern California. Gr~Dunczn RECEIVED F e eI99S i February 14, 1995 TO: The City of Temecula Temecula Fhnning Comntissicm 4S174 Business Far~I)rive ATTENTION: Chairman Ford; Ccwmx~s~ners Bhir, Fahey, slaven az',~d Webster N/colas Valley Special Study Recommendation I would 1/ke to thank you and the city staff for undertaking' the extra effort of orchestrating the special study meetings for the residents of the Nicolaz Valley Special Study area. The information was enliZhtexdnz and valuable. The individuals from the city staff were always professional and courteous to what could be described as a sometimes 'lively' crowd. Titis is exemplary city government, "of the people, for the people and by the people'. All involved should be commended. I rcccommend that no change be made to the Current Nicolas Valley Area Zoning. The first study meeting was at~ended by rouZtdy 5096 of the property owners. Roughly half were opposed to increased zoninz density. The second meeting was artended by rouXhly 2096 of the tn~pex~ owners. RouZldy 8096 were opposed to increased zoning density. A handful of residents were in favor of doing ~somethinz' and this floated alonX the lines of improvements tO drainaXe and circulation, but nor necessarily I believe that there is an overall negative value-_~ed usociatecl w~th increased population density in what is now l=edomixmtely a 2 1/2 acre minimum parcel are~ The following are perceived to be the negatives associated with an increase in zoning density and are contrax~ to the 'highes~ and best use' of the Nicolas Valley ares~ l l I Decreased quality of current rural lifestyle Increased vehicular and pedestrian bxffic Increased local population density and crime Negative impact. for safe equestrian usage Further eradication of an unlisted endangered species: The 'Fd,xral Temeculan Resident' Nicolas Valley Special Study Recommendation Page I can find no clear overriding positive aspects, (either financially, culturally or quality. of life enhancing) to the pzvposal to change the existing zoninX.~ R-R-2 1/2. I located to Temecula, specifically in the Nicolas Valley aru, to envy the riches of the rural lifestyle. I do not desire, nor can I afford, the costs associated with improvements, assessments, etc. which are directly linked to increased density. In this regard I would be poorer in more ways than one. I am not a developer, but am a homeowner residing in the immediate neighborhoods of the Nicoias Valley Special Study and my lifestyles are directly impacted by the results and recommendations that this process will produce. I intend to be represented when the study recommendations are brought before the P1anni~ Commission and subsequently the City Council. I would like this letter to be placed on record as being in opposition to zoning density increases when the hearing is conducted. Additionally, I would like to extend my gratitude to the you and the commission members for ~ the residents who voiced their opposition to the Johnson Ranch high density residen~sl l~:oposd. I believe that Temecula is fully capable of becominS an attractive mix of rural residential units coupled with a balance of light industrial businesses. This distinctive association can offer the community an opportunity for prosperity, self-reliance and rur~ charisma second to none. It can establish itself as a shining example for others on how to mature as a community without the ills ~ted with high density residential development which have Mease continue to maintin a questioni~ attitude re~arding the merit of h/gh density residential growth pz~posed by land developers, especially in the Johnson and Roripaugh projem which impact my immediate area. I am a member of a growing population of local rural residents who stand in opposition to the intense residential development of rural Temeoula and its c:irrent spheres of influence. We are collectively known as CaRT - Coalition for a Rural Temecula, Use my voice to communicate to the representatives of these projects that we believe in adding greater value to Temecula through less-dense, rural-residential development. ATTACHMENT NO. 5 LETTERS SUPPORTING INCREASES IN LAND USE DESIGNATION 2/17/95 To: Craig Ruiz City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Dr. Temecula, Ca. 92590-3606 General Plan / Nicolas Valley Study Area Assessor Parcel No t s 9.14-500-'12,13, 14,15, 8, & 10 Dear Craig -As pointed out at the 2/13/95 work shop, =here is a tremendous drainage and future infrastructure impact along Nicolas road. The burden is greater on my property than most.o=her's. Density intensifica=ion is necessary to ever hope to bear the cost associated with any future development for my property. In order that I might~be able to carry those cos~ I respectfully: request a medium to high density designation for this entire · block, including AP ~ 914-500-8,9,10,12,13,14,15,16,& 17, This block is bordered by Nicolas Rd.,North - Calle Medusa, West and Calle Girasol, East. Tract ~s 18518,23483,22148, and 23220 (map included) are directly adjacent and border my block to the south. These tracts are 7200 sq. ft. lots with a total of 584 plus homes and are occupied now. The city park site is also adjacent to this block. Please review the exhibits enclosed and prepare a copy for each commissioner for the. meeting. Thank you for your help in this matter. If you have any questions regarding any of the above, please feel free to call Ron Rauch, at (714) 583-0441 Sincerely, ~ 2/17/95 To: Craig Ruiz City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Dr. Temecula, Ca. 92590-3606 General Plan / Nicolas Valley Study Area Z Assessor Parcel No~s 914-500-12,13,14,15,8,& 10 Dear Craig As pointed out at the 2/13/95 work shop, there is a ~remendous drainage and future infrastructure impact along'Nicolas road. The burden is greater on my property than most other's. Density intensification is necessary to ever hope'to bear the cost associated with any future development for my property. In order that I migh~ be able to carry those cost, I respeczfully request a medium to high density designation for this entire block, including AP I 914-500-8,9,10,12,13,14,15,16,& 17, This block is bordered by Nicolas Rd.,North - Calle Medusa, West and Calle Girasol, East. Tract #'s 18518,23483,22148, and 23220 (map included) are directly adjacent and border my block to the south. These tracts are 7200 sq. ft. lots with a total of 584 plus homes and are occupied now. The city park site is also adjacent to this block. Please review =he exhibits enclosed and prepare a copy for each commissioner for the meeting. Thank you for your help in regarding any of the above, at (714) 583-0441 this matter. If you have any questions please feel free to call Ron Rauch, Sincerely, February 28,1995 Mr. C. mig Ruiz City of Temecula Planning D~pam~nt 43174 Business Park Drive Tenw, eula, CA 92~90 RE: Nicholas Valley Special Study RECEIVED 0 11 95 .... Thank you for setting up the meeting to obtain the opinion of the property owners in the Nicolas Valley. While I appreciate the effort to derive three scenarios for developmere in the area, I think all three missed the mar~ This group of diverse propen}, owners cannot be treated as a few major land developers. What you basically offered was a trade of potential ZOning for development fees, the usual icind of deal with developers. While developers see this as a business deal, most homeowners surely cannot, especially if they like the land that they have as is. In addition, the itnpwvements offered were simply not much of a benefit. We should not need improve Nicolas Road, when the main collectors are Calle Cdrasol and Liefer Roads, both of which will soon be paved regardless. We should also not try to turn flood plains into housing tracts by lining the creeks at great cost and then creating liquefaction problems, This is not what the people in the area want, even the ones who own property for speculative purposes. It's no wonder that little interest was shown in your proposals. These proposal would increase the tax burden for many years in exchange for potential financial gain that can't be realiTed until the property is cut up. I also do not agree that a consensus was reached for all Nicolas Valley landowners at the meeting. Many of the lot owners were absentees and could not make time meethg. I know flint some of them bought property they expected to be able to split in order to finance dream houses or make retirement more comfortable. We did not hear from these folks. ff this area is develop into an quality rural residential neighborhood, the current very low density zoning must be changed. The currently developed properties are quite varied, and for this reason the area cannot support mansions of the type in Santiago Ranchos which have the same minimum lot size. The problem now is that the land has litfie value since dwelling units cannot be constructed without the major expense of bring an all-weather road from the unit to existing all-weather road. When Calle GirasoVC. alle Chapos and Liefer are paved, the land will become more val-able, making it feasible to build higher quality homes, one of the few viable land uses since small projects with inexpensive homes could not compete with the major subdivisions. Given the varied owners, from land specnlators to fixed income retirees, the usllal developer-city bargaining cannot be followed. I propose a different approach based on the following: 1. Let the creeks be creeks and make no special effort to turn flood plains into housing tracts. The highest density shown in your proposals was in the flood plaln.~ (since they are fiat) when actually many of the lots should have zew density unless the owner performs remedialion as a condition to development. 2. Allow zoningfrom 1/2 to 2 1/2 acres in the General Plan depending on the specific topography of the pwperty and the willingness of the owner to perform the necessary remediation. Don~t tie the general plan to improvements at the start, but mandate improvements as a requirement for lot splits to less than the current 2 1/2 acres. 3. The improvements to Nicolas Road should be borne by the mega developments proposed by Roripaugh and Johnson. They will have thousands of houses that would routinely use this road co~-pn.~l to a few trsi. clences in the Nicolas Valley that really need the mad. 4. Other than the soon-to-be completed ~mprovements on Calle Girasol/Calle Chapos and Liefer Roads, let p~of~t ty owners be responsible for them. Most of these will be short sections of road affecting only a relatively few properties. The existing requ~n~nts for paved, all-weather access for new dwellings is ~t to enforce the needed iHlproveftlents. 5. If ~ improvements are required, oonect fees per lot as a part of the split process and put them in as they can financed. I hope that you will consider the points raised. I think most of us prolz, ty owners in the Nioolas Valley, especially those of us who live here now, want ti~ area to mnain rural in take this into account and provide us with tls: needed flem'bili~ to create tis: neighborhood that we desire. Please don't rush to a decision. Let absentee landownen (which I am contacted to uptints- the sip~ntiotl) have their say. If at all possible, any decisiml should be made after the paving of the collector rcstl!. W'~hout your help, the Nioolas Valley will be proud of. Temecula, CA 92591 cc: Planning Commission ATTACHMENT NO. 4 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES APRIL 3, 1995 R:~S'FAFFRFF~PAN.CC ~/16/95 vfv 6 DRAFT lecula Plannine Commission March ~95 Wright, Temecula spoke in favor of the project. CC COlT INPUT ~r Slaven asked staff to work through on changing )rimary colors. Coral through this. ~ir had a concern with the large parking After discussion the by: >wing items were recognized asked staff to work lee everyone could abide No sign to be id. Elimination of primary and blue station and the red on Additional landscaping in Shops F and I, to be c building. Attractive benches as res Facia on theater/Major F Shopping cart ~reas to MacDonalds canopy styled to Pedestrian walk-w~ the blue stripe on the Chevron. g lot. at the same time as the theater/Major Four along main drive aisle. to appear as several small buildings. ade more attractive by Ralphs. with the entire center. }proaching from southwesterly corner of the center. It was moved by Planning Application No. Parcel Map. Blair and seconded by ~5CUPand Planning missioner Slaven to approve the No. PA94-0097,Tentative The motion carried ~WS-' AYES: 4 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Fahey, NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSEI 0 COMMISSIONERS: NONE AB~ ,IN: I COMMISSIONERS: Ford ~bster Fahey called for a recess at 9:20 p.m. ~g of the Temecula Planning Commission was reconvened at 9:30 ommissioner Ford presiding. with 4. Nicolas Valley Soecial Study (PA94-0098} Associate Planner Saied Naaseh-Shahry presented the staff report which highlighted the background for the study. Representatives from NBS Lowmy presented the draft opportunities and constraints analysis end the alternative land uses for the Nicolas Valley. R:%Minutee~:)3069S.pc 3 Temecula Plannino Commission PUBLIC HEARING The public hearing was opened at 10:00 PM DRAFT March 6, 1995 Dennis Fit"z, 39910 Jeffrey Hights Road, stated he was in favor raising density and wants the study to go forward to find alternatives for the property in Nicolas Valley. Helen Lasangna, P.O. Box 1136, spoke against raising density or paving the roads in Nicolas Valley. Tom Koleuch, 5433 W. 117th Street, Inglewood, spoke in opposition to increased land use in Nicolas Valley. C. E. Edwards, 39675 Nicolas Road, spoke in opposition to increased density. Vic Deforest, 39675 Cantrell Rd., opposed development for economic, environmental and other reasons. Jerry Montante, 31606 Calla Gerasol, was in favor of a possible change in land use due to proposed build-out in the eastern portion of the study area. Lynn Owen, P. O. Box 1991, Nuevo opposed change in the area of Nicolas Valley.' Ron Rauch, 25301 Cabot Rd., Laguna, acting as spokesman for owners of nine parcels in the Nicolas Valley stated the group would like to have a separate increased land use designation for their parcels. Tha public hearing was closed at 10:20 PM Commissioner Slaven asked that staff provide information on the emergency vehicle passage way on the dirt roads in Nicolas Valley. Commission concerns for staff investigation were as follows: · Alternatives in density · Roripaugh/Johnson Ranch status · Currant Assessment Districts and how the changes in future roads will be funded, · What standards are included in the Master Plan · Clarification on how A.D. 161 was formed · Status on flooding and elevation It was moved by Commissioner Blair, seconded by Commissioner Slaven to continue this matter to April 3, 1995. R:%Minutes%O30695.pc 4 DRAFT Temecula Plannine Commission March 6.1995 The motion carried as follows: AYES: 5 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Fahey, Slaven, Webster, Ford NONE NONE DIRECTOR'S REPORT · i · ~ning Director Thornhill reported on the following: will be received on the school mitigation plan issue 28th of March. ;ouncil conducted the first reading of the Vendor ince for approval. has awarded the contract for user fees. Janet k has been hired as the Main Street inator and the Planning.' Depa looking forward to working PLANNING COMMISSION SSION The Commission asked motorists making "U" Turns mffic Commission look into the abuse by io Bank on Ynez Road. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Commissioner adjourned at 10:40 p.m. to Elementary School California. Next re room, 4 and by Commissioner Slaven the meeting be ~nson Ranch March 13, 1995 6:00 p.m., Vail Multipurpose Room, ~915 Mira Loma Drive; Temecula, March 20, 1995, 6:00 p.m., Rancho i Winchester Road, Temecule, California. liforole Water District's Board Chairman Steve Ford Secretary R:Wlinutee%O3069S.pc 5 ATTACHMENT NO. 5 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MARCH 6, 1995 ~-~TA~mPr~PA~4.CC ~l~J5 ~ 7 CITY OF TB~ECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: Banning Commission Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning,L~"'*~'' DATE: April 3, 1995 SUBJECT: Continued Public Hearing for Planning Application No. PA94-0098, Nicolas Valley Special Study Prepared By: RECOMMENDATION: Craig D. Ruiz, Assistant Banner RECOMMEND to the City Council that no Changes be Made to the Land Use Designation within the Nicolas Valley Study Area. BACKGROUND The Nicolas Valley Special Study was previously heard by the Planning Commission at their March 6, 1995 meeting. Planning staff and the City's consultant presented the report and the Commission heard public testimony before continuing the item to the April 3, 1995 meeting. Prior to continuing the item, the Commission directed staff to respond to concerns raised by the Commission and members of the public at the April 3, 1995 meeting. DISCUSSION Public Services Commissioner Slaven expressed concern regarding the provision of public services in the Nicolas Valley area due to the unpaved roads. Goal 3.1 of the Public Safety Element of the General Plan requires that the City ensure the provision of adequate facilities and police and fire-service personnel. The current City requirement is that paved, all-weather access be provided for new development. At the present time, during situations when the roads are impassable, the residents do not receive adequate public services (trash, fire, police). Potential Reauirements for Johnson Ranch and Rorioauah Ranch Commissioner Webster requested that staff provide the Commission with the infrestructum requirements for the Johnson Ranch Specific Plan {SP) and the Roripaugh Ranch SP. The Johnson Ranch SP draft conditions of approval require the developer to provide for two-lanes, paved, all-weather access on Nicolas from Joseph Road to Butterfield Stage Road, The Roripaugh SP is still in the initial stages and draft conditions of approval have not been prepared for the project. However, staff anticipates that, at a minimum, the Roripaugh Ranch SP will have a similar two-lane, paved all weather access requirement as the Johnson Ranch SP (resulting in four lanes of improvements in total). R:\FORNS%NEII) 3/30/95 ktb 1 Assessment Districts Members of the public and Commission raised questions regarding the existing assessment districts in the area and the ~equiraments to form a district. The Nicolas Valley study area des not lie within an Assessment District. The nearest Assessment District (AD), AD 161 ends at the westedy boundary of the study area. However, there are City-wide assessments that the City des charge property owners through their property tax bill. These charges include: Operation and Maintenance of City parks, facilities, programs and activities; Service Level A, arterial street lighting, medians, and traffic signal lighting; and Service Level D, refuse collection and recycling. As for the formation of an assessment district, a majority vote of the property owners is required. At the last Commission hearing, some members of the public stated that, in the case of A D 161, many property owners were unaware they were within the District. Generally, large land owners form assessment districts to fund the improvements for future subdivisions. These newly subdivided parcels then become pert of the assessment district. As required by the State Department of Real Estate, the seller must provide the buyer with a disclosure statement (White Report) indicating that the land is within an assessment district. Unfortunately, it is possible that buyers either do not completely read their White Report or may not understand the implications of being within a district. Rood Elevation Difference for Nicolas Road Commissioner Ford requested that staff determine how high Nicolas Road would need to be elevated to be removed from the 100-year flood plain. Neither the City nor the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) have done a detailed analysis of the limits of the 100-year flood plain. However, based upon preliminary information, staff estimates that Nicolas Road would need to be elevated a minimum of three feet on average to be elevated out of the flood plain. Access Restriction on Nicolas Road Commissioner Ford requested that staff provide information regarding how the General Ran access restriction requirement would affect current and future development along Nicolas Road. While an existing legal parcel along Nicolas Road would be allowed to take access from Nicolas Road, future subdivisions along Nicolas Road may, as a condition of approval, be required to provide an alternative access or create a single public/private access road to several properties. General Plan Circulation Several Commissioners questioned how it is determined that certain projects are constructed by the City while other projects are not. As part of the City's annual budget process, the City prepares a Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for the provision of public improvements over five year period. Projects are scheduled based upon a priority ranking system ultimately approved by the City Council. Projects are ranked Priority I (highest) through Priority 4 (lowest). For circulation projects, all Priority 1 projects are again ranked by their priority. The CIP circulation projects in the Nicoles Valley include the Walcott Corridor (Priority 1 ), Nicolas Road (Priority 4) and Butterfield Stage Road (Priority 4). R:\FOIBIS~BIO 3/30/95 ktb' Reauest for Hieher Density As shown in Attachment No. 2, a representative for the property owners of Study Areas G & J is requesting that this area receive increased density {Medium Residential, 7-12 Dwelling Units Per Acre). The representative feels that this designation would be both a logical extension of the existing single family development to the south of Study Area J, and would facilitate the necessary infrastructure improvements need for the area. In reviewing this request, staff has examined the land use patterns in this area. While Study Area J is bounded by single family "tract" housing to the south, the study area is also bounded by R-A-2 ½ zoning {2 ½ acre minimum parcel size) on the north, east and west. It is staff's opinion that the creation of an "island" of medium density residential development among R-A-2 ½ parcels would create inconsistent land use petterns. Also, the development to the south of Study Area J ends at the top of · ridge.. The ridgeline creates a natural topographical boundary for the Study Area. Therefore, staff does not support this request. CONCLUSION As stated in the March 6, 1995 staff report, it is staff's opinionthat the Nicolas Valley could support an increase in land use intensity. However, based upon the input of the majority of area residents, it is staff's recommendation that the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council that the Very Low Residential Land Use Designation for the Nicolas Valley remain unchanged· Attachments: March 6, 1995 Planning Commission Staff Report - Blue Page 4 Letters Requesting Increased Density - Blue Page 5 R=\F0~Ii%IIN0 3/30/~5 ktb 3 ATTACHMENT NO. '1 MARCH 6, 1995 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT R:\FQRIIS~!BC kl.b ATTACHMENT NO. 2 LETTERS REQUESTING INCREASED DENSITY R:\STAFFRPT\98PA94.PC2 3/Z9/95 ktb Greomp lie, A Red ~mte & IX. veloma~mt Compmy March 16, 1995 Mr. Craig Ruiz Assistant Planner Planning Dept. City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, Ca. 92590-3606' Ref: General Plan /~Ntcolas Valley Study Area Assessor Parcel-NO's 914-500-8,9,10,12,13,14,15,16 & 17. ~ Nine (9) Parcels, Totaling Forty (40) +/- acres. Dear Craig: The above-properties are curren=!y owned by Mr. Robert Droiet, Ms. Be LaForce, and Mr.& Mrs. George Starcevich; and RSD Group, Inc. has been asked to represent their interests in this matter. The above named owners have been involved in the Nicolas Valley area in excess of Thirty (30) years and have submitted the appropriate requests seeking a "density intensification" for their entire block. The designation' requested is M 7-12 (Medium Density Seven to Twelve Dwelling Units per Acre), Single Family Residential Units, and the entire block is buffered on Three (31 sides by the existing roads known as: Nicolas Rd.- North; Calla Medusa- West; and Calla Girasol- East. The Southern boundary to the entire block is adjacent to Medium Density (7,200 Sq. Ft.Lots), Single Family Residential Units. · These properties represent an assemblage of necessity, and collectively will be conditioned upon improvements to: Calla Medusa; Calla Girasol; and Nicolas Rd. As you know, there are flood plain, drainage, and flood control issues that can be mitigated in a feasible manner; providing the entire Forty (40} +/- Acres, the full block, can be developed simultaneously. For example, the Nineteen (19) Acres fronting Nicolas Rd. are primarily in.the ~lood plain area, and studies have indicated a need for approximately Sixty Five ~housand (65,000) cu. yds. of 25301 Cabot Road, Suite 21 6 * Laguna Hills, CA 926B · (7~ 4) 583-0441 import dirt. This will then accommodate the raising of both Nicolas Rd. and the Sixteen (16} Acres in the flood plain, approximately Two (21 Feet in elevation. This import yardage requirement is available from the subject Forty (40) Acres. In addition; at some future date, there will be a need for a major drainage device to be installed at Zhe intersection Calle Girasol and Nicolas Rd. Through "density intensification", of the subject Forty (40} Acres, this project will be capable of mitigating all improvements and cost issues, as well. The current HEC Study submitted by the Robert Bein, William Frost & Associete's engineers for The City, reflects a' Cu. Ft./Sec. of 8,800. This Study Area targeted is the Santa Gertrud!s Creek at Calle Girasol. The impact is tremendous on the subject properties, and the total costs must be amortized over approximately Two Hundred (200) Units, or the proposed project feasibility will be in serious doubt. These improvements can most likely be conditioned and agreed during the Tentative Map process; and again, the project could then amortize the total costs within the project. No Mello-Roose andno Assessment Districts would be necessary. The properties are adjacent and congruent to each other; and on behalf of the owners, we respectfully request a M 7-12 (Media% Density Seven to Twelve Dwelling Units per Acre), Single Family Residential Unit designation. Craig, we've enclosed Six (6) additional copies of this correspondence for any and all individuals who may have an interest in the project, and we thank you in advance for your time and consideration. Sincerely, RSD Group, Inc. Ronald J. Rauch President ATTACHMENT NO. 6 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES MARCH 6, 1995 5;16/93 vs, w 8 TEM~'tu ^ p~ANNING COMMISSION The motion carried a~\,':,~'.~nws: DRAFT AYES: 4 COMM~R'-, RS: ' Fahey, Slaven, ~/--/ Ford NOE~y~/~ COMMISSI /~BSENT: I COMMISSIONERS: Blair APRIL 3. 1995 Webster, PUBLIC HEARING ITFMS 3. Nicolas Valley Special Studv (PA94-0098) Craig Ruiz, Assistant Planner, responded to the concerns of the Commission expressed at the last Commission meeting. Staff recommends no increase in density and no change in the land use for Nicolas Valley. Commissioner Slaven asked about the liability of the City should emergency vehicles not be able to drive into the area. City Attorney Greg Diaz responded the City would not be exposed to liability because the roads had been accepted for emergency maintenance. Commissioner Fahey left the dias at 6:10 PM to take an emergency phone call. PUBLIC HEARING The public hearing was opened at 6:30 P.M. Betty Sprouse, 39390 Liefer Road spoke against any changes in the area. James McCarthy, 39420 Pala Vista Road, spoke against any changes on Nicolas Road. Diane Welter, 39515 Liefer Road, said she wants to leave the area as it is. Rita Abby, 39520 Liefer Road, spoke in opposition to assessments and does not want increased density. Helen Lasagna, 30885 Nicolas Road, stated she feels Butterfield Road should be developed by Roripaugh Ranch and other developers and no assessment fees be placed on the residents. R:%Minutee .po'd 20594 1 DRAFT TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION APRIL 3. 1995 Staff explained that all roads were reviewed in the study and for discussion only. Staff recommends leaving the area as is and that no assessment fees be incurred. C.E. Edwards, 31250 Nicolas Road, spoke against re-zoning. Commissioner Fahey returned to the dias at 6:35 PM Dennis Fisk, 39910 Jeffrey Heights Road, said he feels change is evident ' and zoning should be done on a one to one basis. Frank Furgiuele, 400 Ambulant Court Temecula, spoke in favor of rural area and zoning maintained at 2 1/2 acre parcels. Larry Bales, 3040 Jessie Circle, spoke against change in the area. Mike Melton, 31950 Pala Vista Road, Temecula, representing rural area residents who want the area to remain rural. Ron Rauch, 25301 Cabot Road, Laguna, acting as spokesman for owners of nine parcels in the Nicolas Valley stated the group would like to have density intensification for the quality of the area. The public hearing was closed at 6:55 PM COMMISSION INPUT Commissioner Webster agreed with staff that the area should remain at 2 1/2 acre density and the rural element maintained. It was moved by Commissioner Blair and seconded by Commissioner Fahey to approve the staff recommendation to the City Council there be no change in Land Uses within the study area of Nicolas Valley. The motion carried as follows: AYES: 5 COMMISSIONERS: NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: Fahey, Slaven, We'bster, Ford, Blair None None Commissioner Ford wanted to have on record that the Johnson Ranch and the Roripaugh Development are proposed projects and if not approved would not materialize. R:\Minutes.pc%120594 2 ITEM 16 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager  -Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer May 23, 1995 Spray Injection Machine RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council review and discuss the report on Spray Injection Machines, and provide direction to staff. BACKGROUND: An article in the April, 1995 issue of Institute of Transportation Studies (ITS) described a piece of equipment for pothole repairs. At their regular meeting of April 25, 1995 City Council directed the staff to report on that piece of equipment. I requested Brad Buron, our Maintenance Superintendent to arrange with Mr. Don Bender, City of San Diego Maintenance Superintendent a demonstration of capabilities of the equipment. On May 9, 1995, Mayor Stone, Brad Buron, and Joseph Kicak traveled to San Diego, where we observed the equipment filling potholes. For that purpose the equipment is extremely efficient and in my opinion performs as described in the ITS article (copy attached). The major disadvantage is the fact that the high efficiency of that equipment is limited to filling of the potholes. Currently, our crews milize pre-mixed, bagged asphalt concrete for that purpose. Although much less efficient than utilizing the Spray Injection Machine, current history of pothole repairs indicates that due to the number of "Potholes" patched, utilization of this equipment in the City would be at a very low level. Based on the reports for this fiscal year a total of 4,654 sq. ft. of potholes was patched by our crews from July 1, 1994 to April 30, 1995. Assuming an average of four (4) sq. ft. per pothole, the total number of potholes patched during that period was less than 1,200. Based on the article in ITS, the equipment can patch 100 potholes (average) per day. This translates into 12 working days for that piece of equipment from July 1, 1994 to April 30, 1995. During the demonstration, we inquired about the equipment's capability to patch a strip such as five (5) feet wide and ten (1 O) feet long. We were advised that it would be inefficient and the standard construction method for such repairs would be utilized much more efficiently. -I- r.~gdqet%gb'~OS23%smay. agn/aile Considering that the City of Sen Diego, with older streets and almost 3,000 miles of total street mileage, it appears that such equipment could be used effectively. In the City of Temecula, majority of the streets are relatively new with a total mileage accepted for maintenance of approximately 1 O0 miles. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: 1. ITS April, 1995 issue -2- ~gdmt~,gS%OS23~.epray.agnJ~l) INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORTATION STUDIES ALSO IN THIS ISSUE: The Case for Spray Irljection Energy Saving LED Traffic Signals Computer Access to C~ty Hall APRIL 1995 ,_ -~ TECH TRANSFER Technology Transfer Program University of California A National Report on Cost-Effective Pothole . under such conditions is a challenge. The remaining potholes are typically ~epaired as part of routine maintenance in warm. dry weather, creating an opportunity to place patches that will last as long as the pavement that surrounds them. With a goal of helping highway agencies to optim ize their pothole repair operations, the Strategic Highway Research Program (SHRP) conducted a comprehensive study to identify materials and procedures that would provide longer-lasting repairs. In essence, SHRP's effort was initiated to answer two basic questions: ( Conrimmed on pa.~e re.o) Cost-Effective Pothole Repair ( Continued from page one ) · Which materials last longer under all weather conditions? · Which procedure is cost effective? National Experiment on Pothole Repair The pothole experiment was done in two phases. In the first phase, promising materi- als with a history of good performance were identified through a questionnaire distrib- uted to state Departments of Transportation and other transportation agencies around the world, a search of available literature and in- depth interviews with knowledgeable people. Materials were then selected for field instal- lation at sites distributed through the U.S. and one Canadian province. The locations were Alturas, California; Modoc Point, Or- egon; Draper, Utah; Las Vegas, New Mexico; Greenville, Texas; Vandalia, Illinois; Bradford, Vermont; and Prescott, Ontario. Based on this work, SHRP developed a manual of practice for longer-lasting repair of potholes entitled, "Materials and Proce- dures for the Repair of Potholes in Asphalt- Surfaced Pavements." Each public agency in California can receive a briefing session and one free copy of the manual by contact- ing a University of California.field engineer (see page 11 for a list of field engineers and their service areas) or by calling the Technology Transfer Center at (510) 231-9590. A SHRP manual on repair- ing cracks in asphalt pavements is included in the same volume. The pothole repair manual discusses, in easy- to-follow language, the various stockpiled and packaged cold mix asphalt concrete materials and installation procedures that will give the most cost-effective, long'last- ing patches under all weather conditions. John Hibbs, a consultant working to help disseminate results of the SHRP work to local transportation agencies, said one of the most useful aspects of the manual is its cost comparison of the various procedures and a step-by-step procedure for calculating cost- effectiveness for any agency's current pot- hole repair needs. "I would say to public works directors, 'What you're doing may be as good or better than what SHRP did. But take the time to do a little cost comparison using our tables. You can compare your costs to what researchers found all over the country. "' 'NI/hat you're doing may be as good or better than what SHRP did. But take the time to do a little cost comparison using our tables. You can compare your costs to what researchers found all over the country." - John Hibbs, consultant Materials Chosen for Testing SHRP's field research tested three different types of cold mixed asphalt concrete: those produced by a local plant using local mate- rials, those produced by a local plant in accordance with an agency's specifications, and proprietary cold mixes - brand-name products in which the asphalt and the aggre- gate are carefully matched according to a precise formula. The proprietary materials tested by SHRP were UPM High Performance Cold Mix, QPR 2000 and Perma-Patch. The "agency specified" category included PennDOT 485, PennDOT 486 and FHMS-2 mixes. Hot mix asphalt concrete was not field tested. Explaining their rationale, SHRP research- ers said the superior performance of hot mix when placed in dry holes was well docu- mented in the survey phase of the SHRP effort. Furthermore. hot mix is not readily available throughout the year in many pans of the country and generally is not used in wet or wintry weather. Although hot mix for pothole patching is more common in California than in the nation as a whole because of milder weather :and more hot mix plants in much of the state, most agencies still use cold mix for winter patching. Two findings from the survey phase of the SHRP research may be of particular interest to California public works directors: · In dry holes, hot mix and proprietary cold mixes perform about the same. · Proprietary mixes last two to four ti~ long as conventional cold mixes in colt. . ~ wet conditions. SHRP researchers also found that dry holes significantly improve patch life. Procedures Tested In its field testing phase, SHRP evaluated three procedures for patching potholes: throw-and roll, semi-permanent and spray injection. The throw-and-roll technique is a high-pro- ' duction technique with some ~/ariation from the commonly used throw-and-go or "dump- and-run" technique. In the throw-and-roll technique, the patch is compatited using the truck's tires. It consists of the following steps: · Place the mix in the hole (which may have water and loose aggregate in it). · Compact the patch by rolling with truck tires five or six times. · Leave some crown on the patch. · Move to the next hole. ~---~. The semi-permanent method. also knc, the "do it fight" method, has long been 2 TECH TRANSFER University of California POTHOLE REPAIR The throw-and-roll procedure can be as effective as the semi-permanent procedure when quality materials are used. considered one of the preferred methods of repairing potholes. The steps include: 4~ Remove water and loose aggTegate. ~ Square the sides of the patch area with vertical faces. · Place the mix. J.,Compact with a device smaller than the l',.h area (single drum vibratory rollers ,/ibratory plate compactors work best). 4~ Clean and clear the work area before reopening to traffic. Although the procedure provides longer last- ing patches, it does require more workers and equipment and longer times to patch (as much as four times the throw-and-roll pro- cedure). This consequently results in lower productivity, longer worker exposure to traf- fic, and longer motorists' delay. The spray-injection technique, also known as "velocity fill," requires specialized equip- ment for patching. There are two types of units, trailer-mounted or self-contained truck units. Regardless of the type, the device places virgin ag=~regate and heated emulsion into the pothole simultaneously at high velocity. This procedure can be carried out in most weather conditions. The procedure consists of the following steps: · Blow water and loose material from the "pray a tack coat of binder on the sides d~ bottom. · Blow emulsion and aggregate into the hole. · Cover the patched area with a layer of aggregate. 4~ Clean and clear the area before opening to traffic. The equipment will not work for proprietary materials and does require a skilled operator to obtain a good patch. Spray-injection patches perform as well as most of the other patches although the devices. don t use proprietary materials. Summary of Techniques SHRP's field experiment results, relative to installation procedures, showed that: · The throw-and-roll procedure can be as effective as the semi-permanent procedure when quality materials are used. Cost Effectiveness of Patching , Spray-injection patches perform as well as most of the other patches although the devices donTt use proprietary materials. These results have prompted Some agencies to switch from the inexpensive cold mixes they were using previously to one of the quality materials used in the experiment. One agency has also purchased a spray- injection device to replace its conventional cOld-mix patching material. Designing a Cost Effective System When planning a program for pothole pairs, the cost of material is the least signifi- cant of the three costs associated with the operation. Labor and equipment are bigger contributors to the overall cost. This fact is emphasized in the table below. ' The chart shows the cost of filling a cubic foot ofpothole using different materials and procedures. The data on patch life are from SHRP field research. The analysis is for a five-year period. As the chart indicates, the throw-and-roll procedure using high-quality material will provide cost-effective patches. Compaction with truck fires as part of the throw-and-roll technique is a must. Use of a spray injection device by a qualified operator will also pro- vide cost-effective patches.O Source: Strategic Highway Research Program ' Material Type Local Proprietary Local Spray In~eetion Procedure Throw- Throw- Semi- Spray and-Roll and-Roll Permanent Injection Materials, S/ton 20 85 20 0 Crew, S/day 300 300 600 0 Traffic, S/day 250 250 250 250 Equipment, S/day 80 80 130 930 Productivity, tons/day 4.0 4.0 1.5 4.0 Tons Required 200 200 75 200 Patch Life, months 3 21 12 21 5-Year Cost, $ 710,000 139,000 252,000 168,570 COst Effectiveness, S/cubic foot 44 9 42 ll No. 49 APRIL The Case for Spray Injection Machines Results of the Strategic Highway Research Program (SHRP) show that spray injection machines for pothole repair are no more cost-effective than using the familiar throw-and-roll technique with high-quality material. However, some experienced public works people are convinced that the machines have certain advantages over throw-and-roll. Spray injection machines are blower type machines that employ a three-stage repair method to patch potholes: A hand-held or boom-mounted nozzle is used to (1) blow any loose debris and water out of the pot- hole, (2) blow a tack coat of emulsion, and (3) blow aggregate coated with emulsion into the hole. The high velocity of spray provides compaction from bottom up. Two types of machines are available: truck mounted units for $70,000-$125,000 which can be operated by one. person in the cab and trailer mounted units for between $25,000 and $45,000. Two types of spray injection machines are available: various kinds of truck mounted units which can be operated by one person from within the truck cab and are priced between $70,000 and $125,000, and several trailer mounted units that typically cost $25,000 to $45,000. Ned for Experienced Operators According to John Hibbs, a consultant work- ing to disseminate SHRP's findings, final ~-~.- "-7 A $pray injection machine would ~ taed to blow any loose debris or water out of a ~thole ~fore the emulsion and ogRregate are blown into it. reSUl, dc~fibing ~c ovc~] ~ffo~ce of spray ~j~tion m~hines ~ a bit skewed ~cause of a problem in laying test patches at the Alto, C~ifomi~ test site. A defiled SH~ rear explains that ~ o~rator from ~othcr p~ of ~e count, using volc~ic agFegate with higher abso~tive ch~cter- istics ~ ~c o~rator w~ ~customed to, f~led to use enough binder. Low ~sidu~ binder content !cd to raveling of the ag~- gate ~d some premature failures. Hibbs said ~is ~cu~nce ~ts out ~e need for ~ ex~fienced o~mtor with ~owledge of both equipment o~mtions ~d matcfi~ ch~- actefistics. Even with these problems, Hibbs said, ~e C~ifomia spray injection tests suited in 80% of test patches sullying after 18 months. Aside ~om that round of test patches at Al~s, Hibbs said, spray injec~on patches slightly ou~do~ed ~ow-~d-mll ~tches when it came to durability. (These detailed results are covered in SHRP report H-353, "Innovative Materials Development and Testing Volume 2: Pothole Repair." Copies are available through the ITS Libra~ while supplies last.) Hibbs, who travels the nation ~ p~ of his contract to publicize SHRP msul~, said feed- back from v~ous tr~s~ation agencies h~ convinced him ~at ~c machines have the ~tential to fill ~tholcs much f~r th~ a crew using ~e throw-~d-mll technique. Less repair time means oreater safety for workers and less disruption for the traveling public. Speed of the repair crews increases with practice, Hibbs said. and some agen- cies have received praise from the public for using modern equipment to speed up pot- hole repairs. Another argument made for spray injection machines is that worker's compensation ~:laims may be reduced, because spraying material into potholes is not as hard on workers as using a shovel. Spray injection machines are not as widely used in California as they are in the eastern part of the United States, perhaps because most of the manufacturers are.based in the Southeast or in South Dakota2 They aren't used by the California Department ofTtans- port,~tion, although Caltrans did lay F~""~ test patches last summer for evaluatiot this year. However, Lassen County and the city of San Diego bought spray injection machines for pothole patching early this year, They have found the machines p.atch potholes much faster than the crews they were using before. "You can fill a pothole in just a minute." - John Mitchell, Lassen County Lassen County Lassen County decided this year to purchase the trailer-mounted Dura Patchef spray in- jection machine it had been renting. Public Works Director John Mitchell said the ma- chine is much faster than a crew with shov- els. "You can fill a pothole in just a minute," Mitchell said. MitchelI's crews are using the Dura F to fill wide cracks as well as poL. ~. TECH TRANSFER University of California POTHOLE REPAIR Repairs held up remarkably well through the storms of 1995. including March storms that inundated northern California. Mitchell noted that every spray injection machine is different. He initially rented a different brand, which he returned to the dealer after his crew had problems operating it. One disadvantage of the Dura Pateher, Mitchell said, is it can only carry a few hundred gallons of the oil needed for its operation. So the county purchased a large heated tank which is filled with several thousand gallons ofoil and hauled along with the Dura Pateher, making it possible for crews to patch and fill on rural roads for the entire day. "We don't have enough money to maintain ~""~oads as we would like to, but we are g to keep a seal on them to keep moisture from getting into the foundation of the road- way," Mitchell said. "Of all the machines that we have tried so far, this seems to be the best." City of San Diego The city of San Diego purchased three spray injection trucks for pothole patching, which were delivered in early January at about the time the first big winter storms started hitting the city. The trucks, made by Rosco Manu- facturing of Madison, S.D., were purchased from San Diego dealer Hawthorne Manufac- turing for about $100,000 each. Each truck is operated by one person who cleans and fills the pothole without leaving the truck cab. Don Bender, who supervises the city's pot- hole repair operations, said that as of late March, each truck was patching two to three times as many potholes as a very productive two-man crew working with a dump truck and hand tools. "We patched 114 holes with one truck today, 86 with another and one ~ came in earl ier after patching 60-some ," ~r said. "That compares to 28 potholes, '~;.,.. that's for a crew that really works hard." Bender said getting used to the Rosco trucks took some adjusting. especially since their arrival coincided with a long series of winter storms. Using wet aggregate is not desir- able. he said, and a protective shelter for aggregate is being built. Also, patching in the rain didn't work well even though the operator was in a protected truck. The opera- tor could blow the water out of a pothole but before he could place a tack coat, water would come sheeting down and fill the hole again, Bender said. 'qA/e patched 114 holes with one truck today, 86 with another, and one truck came in earlier after patching 60-some. That compares to 28 potholes, and that's for a crew that really works hard." - Don Bender, City of San Diego The purchase of spray injection trucks was part ofa depamnent reorganization to achieve greater efficiency and better customer ser- vice, Bender said. The number of patch crews was reduced from ten to six, with the remaining people switching to other projects in the street department. The goal for the pothole patching unit is to respond to every complaint call about a pothole within 24 hours. Although the goal has been impos- sible to achieve during winter storms because the department receives 125 to 150 calls per day. it should be achievable when calls return to a normal level of 10 to 25 per day, Bender said. "Now everybody's com- fortable with the trucks and we're really happy with them," he said. Dealers in California Rosco Manufacturing now has three dealers in California. The sale to the city of San Diego was the first big success for dealer Hawthorne Machinery in .two years of marketing the trucks, according to the firm' s sales manager Terry Mueller. Another South Dakota-based company that manu- factures trucks for spray injection has also intensified its California marketing efforts in ~he last two years. Wildcat Manufacturing Co. of Freeman, S.D., has been placing test -patches and is attempting to sell its first Roadpatchcr truck in the state, according to Tim O'Hara, western U.S. territory manager. Older trailer-mounted spray :injection machines (manufactured by AMZ Magnum in the 1980s) are owned by the cities of Mill Valley and Long Beach, and the county of Santa Cruz, according to Tennessee-based AMZ Magnum. Lassen County is the fast county in California to purchase a Dura Pateher unit from Empire Equipment in Sacramento, which became northern Cali- fornia dealer for the Dura Pateher about a year ago. In an effort to make more sales, Empire has been renting the machines to municipalities for periods as short as a few months. A private homeowners association in Kern County recently purchased an AMZ Magnum unit, and Mariposa County intends to purchase a trailer-mounted unit because of successful test patches and its discussions with the Kern County group. Most supervisors of road maintenance op- erations in California apparently remain skeptical about the value of spray injection machines. Several said they had seen the equipment demonstrated and were not that impressed. Others have pothole repair pro- grams that work fine despite lean budgets, and see no need to purchase expensive new machinery.i~ No. 49 APRIL 1995 5 ITEM 17 APPROVAL ~ CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFIC R CITY MANAGE CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Council FROM: Mary Jane McLarney, Assistant City Manager DATE: May 23, 1995 SUBJECT: Temecula Employee Apprenticeship Medel (T.E.A.M'-) Program PREPARED BY: Grant M. Yates, Human Resources Administrator RECOMMENDATION: For City Council to receive this report and provide staff direction. BACKGROUND: Mayor Jeff Stone has proposed a program that he refers to as T.E.A.M. or Temecula Employee Apprenticeship Model. This program is intended to assist area businesses by developing a local job training program. The T.E.A.M. Program will provide employment training opportunities to local high school students through classes and on-the-job training opportunities. Local businesses will help develop the T.E.A.M. program curriculum. This involvement, at the early stage, will ensure that the businesses will be able to select from a pool of qualified workers. Staff has been working with Jay Hoffman, Assistant Superintendent at Temecula Valley Unified School District, to develop a program which is fully integrated with the school system's required educational components. Attached is an outline which explains the proposed components and implementation periods. The following represents the seven (7) steps in the process which will move us from the current one-day shadowing program to the final step of a full apprenticeship program and possible future employment. R:~J,4&~A~rA!~17ssm I One-day Job Shadow (Rotary Program) 2 Extensive Job Shadow 3 Offer above more than I time per year 4 Career Academy 5 Internship 6 Apprenticeship Program ISSUES Currently in place, program only offered once each year. Would require Application and Selection process. Participant required to prepare a report to school detailing experience. Would allow more participation and exposure to both students and businesses. School offered as workskill identification and training program. Non-Paid volunteer program (students compete), to allow Students opportunity to work in business for a specific period. Students compete and are selected based on business needs and student's skill and desire. 7 Full Employment Final step We believe that the above model, coupled with the school district's proposed program, will provide the best possibility of succeeding with both the business community and the school(s). It is also important to note that this is a flexible model and it is not necessary for either a student or a business to move step by step through the model. An example is where BWIP has hired two (2) apprentices to work in their tool crib. When these students graduate, they will have an excellent chance to get a full-time job with BWIP. FISCAL IMPACT: The first year City contribution is $9,615. The second year totals el 4,375. However, many of these costs are soft costs, (i.e. cost of operating the City van) and do not require direct expenditures; therefore, the actual cost for the first year is $7,815 and is included in various line items in the FY 1995-96 operating budget. Attachment - Transition Program t~8"<s ITEM 18 APPROVAL ~ CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICE CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Chief of Police Peter Labahn May 23, 1995 Approval of Joint Traffic Safety Program (Operation SCAIR) RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 95- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING AN AGREEMENT TO PARTICIPATE IN A JOINT TRAFFIC SAFETY PROJECT WITH THE CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL, THE RIVERSIDE SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT AND OTHER SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES BACKGROUND: In an attempt to enhance traffic safety within Southwest Riverside County, the California Highway Patrol has secured a Federal Grant based upon a proposed traffic safety program known as Operation SCAIR. SCAIR is an acronym for South County Accident and Injury Reduction. Operation SCAIR will be funded entirely by the grant monies and will not adversely affect normal deployment of police personnel. Local law enforcement agencies, including the Temecula Police Department recognize the importance of addressing the issue of traffic safety, as well as the importance of apprehending intoxicated drivers, citing motorists who have violated laws which cause accidents and enforcing laws that reduce fatalities, such as seat belt and helmet laws. The program is a coordinated effort between the CHP, Temecula Police Department, Murrieta Police Department and Lake Elsinora Police Department. During the period of July 1, 1995 and June 30, 1996, the participating departments will conduct 28 DUI checkpoints and provide additional roving patrols within the participating agency's jurisdictions. During this period of time, the City of Tamecula will host seven (7) checkpoints. During our checkpoint operation, the other agencies will provide additional roving patrols within the City. Agenda Report - Operation SCAIR May 23, 1995 Page 2 This program is viewed as a positive step towards reducing the number of DUI related traffic collisions and will assist in the effort to reduce the number and severity of injuries sustained in traffic collisions. The Temecula Police Department is fully supportive of this program and appreciates the California Highway Patrol for including us in their grant program. FISCAL IMPACT: None JD/jsg RESOLUTION NO. 9~- A ~.,.qOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING AN AGR.EEV~F TO PARTICIPATE IN A JOINT TRAFFIC SAFETY PRO~_,CT WITH THE CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL, ~ RIVERSIDE SIIERIr'FS DEPARTMENT AND OTHER SOUIHWESTRIVERSIDE COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIF.~ THE C1TY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOUDWS: WHs~KEAS, the California Highway Patrol (CHP) is an operating department within the Business, Tra~on, and Housing Agency having authority and: responsibilities established in the California Vehicle Code; and WIIERF_AS, the overall purpose of the DetmrUnent, as a principal criminal justice agency is to ensure safety, security and service to the public through accident prevention, emergency incident/traffic management, law enforcement, assistance to other public agencies and to maximize service to the public in need of aid or information; and WHKUEAS, between 1986 and 1993, the southwest portion of Riverside County, Temecula Valley, has grown by approximately 302 percent; and ~, along with the population growth the infrastructure consisting of freeways, city streets, and county highways has also grown, bringing an increase in fatalities and injuries resulting from traffic accidents; and WItERF~AS, law enforcement agencies in the area consisting of the CHP, Riverside County Sheriff's Depamnent, Temecula Police Department, Murrieta Police Department and ~ ~lr~ Elsinore Police Department wish to cooperate in a program funded by a Federal Grant to address Waffic safety with major emphasis on (DUI) enforcement; and WHEREAS, the City of Temecula, desires to participate in this pwgram; NOW, ~]]ERF_,FORE, BE 1T RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of TemecuL_a. as follows: Section 1. The City approves the filing of a standard agreement with the California Highway Patrol. Section 2. The City authorizes the Chief of Police to execute the necessary agreements for ~dministration of the traffic safety program. Re, m~XlO~ ' I Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of the Resolution. PASSE!}, APPROVEB AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 23rd day of May, 1995. ATTEST: Jeff Stone, Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE)SS CITY OF TEMEC~) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 95- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a re~fi~r meeting thereof held on the 23rd day of May, 199~, by the following vote: AYES: NOF_~: COUNCILlV~-MBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMPMBERS: lune S. Greek, City Clerk ITEM 19 ITEM 20 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council City Clerk May 23, 1995 Consideration of Street Naming Program RECOMMENDATION: 1. Approve in concept, a policy to allow the American Cancer Society the opportunity to auction a city street name as a fund raising project. 2. Direct staff to formalize the necessary policy and procedures to implement this program. BACKGROUND: Mayor Stone has been contacted by the American Cancer Society regarding the possibility of holding a fund raising auction that would give people the opportunity to bid on a personalized street name. The Cancer Society would like to offer this as an auction item at their annual fund-raiser on June 3, 1995. Staff recommends approval in concept of the program to allow the idea to be used at the June 3rd American Cancer Society event with direction to staff to formalize the method by which this may be applied for in the future. ATTACHMENTS: Letter of request dated April 28, 1995 RECEIVED 1995 CITY MANAGER April28,1995 Mayor Jeff Stone 43 174 Business Park Drive Temecula, California 92590 Dear Mayor Stone, I am the Vice President of The Temeeula/Murrieta Branch of the American Cancer Society. As you know we are always seeking ways of fundraising. I have spoken to Tony Elmo about a great idea that is happening in other western Riverside County cities to help charities such as ours. At our annual fund-raiser on June 3, we will have an auction, at this auction I would like people to be able to bid on a street name. All proceeds will go to the American Cancer Society for this local branch. Other charities have made a handsome profits by having people naming a stree~ after themselves. I think this is an innovative way that the city can work with the American Cancer Society in helping with this unique fund- raiser. Thank you for your consideration of this projeCt. I look forward to hearing from you soon. You may contact me at Diversified Temporary Services Inc., 41877 Enterprise Circle N. #100 Temeeula, CA 92590, 676-8077. Sincerely, Bonnie L. Renz-Hanna Chair "Mardi Gras Style, Night of Caring" DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS APPROVAL:~~' CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Council/City Manager Anthony Elmo, Chief Building Official May 23, 1995 Building and Safety April, 1995, Activity Report RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. DISCUSSION: The following is a summary of activity for April, 1995. Building Permits Issued .....................................238 Building Valuation ................................... $15,041,872 Revenue Collected .................................... $133,548 Housing Starts ........................................... 120 New Commercial Starts .......................... I = 40,000 Sq. Ft. Commercial Additions/Alterations .................. 16 = 49,930 Sq. Ft. Building Inspections ...................................... 1,752 Agenda Repo~ May 23, 1995 Page 2 Code Enforcement Actions ................................... 605 Active Cases Pending ....................................... 50 Closed Cases ........................... ................... 9 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Josel~h Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer May 23, 1995 Public Works Monthly Activity Report' RECOMMENDATION: Attached for City Council's review and filing is the Department of Public Works' Monthly Activity Reports for Al~ril, 1995. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS Monthly Activity Report MAY, 1995 Submitted by: Joseph Kicak: Prepared by: Date: I. WORK UNDER CONSTRUCTION: 1. Pala Community Park: Construction is expected to be completed by the end of May, 1995 and the maintenance period is expected to be completed by the end of August, 1995. The bardscape, building, and utility substructure are complete. The majority of the work. remaining consists of landscaping the park and installing the site amenities such as barbecues, benches and fencing. 2. Traffic Signal nt Winchester Road (HWY. 79N) & Nicolns Road: This project is completed except for some minor punch list items. Once these items are taken care of by the contractor, staff will recommend the acceptance of this project to City Council. This project provided an interim three-way traffic signal to provide traffic control until the ultimate improvements in this area can be constructed. 3. Traffic Signal & Vehicle Pre-Fmption Installation: This project is complete except for the delivery of additional pre-emption emitters. Once the emitters are delivered, staff will recommend the acceptance of this project to City Council. This project consisted of installing pre-emption equipment at four signalized intersections and nine emergency vehicles. 4. Pala Road/Route 79S Interim Improvements: This project is complete and staff will recommend the acceptance at the next City Council meeting. This project provided an exclusive right turn lane for east bound traffic on Highway 79 South onto Pala Road. 5. Winchester Road Interim Ramn Iml)rovements: The contractor has completed the relocations of the traffic signal poles and has installed the curb & gutter on both sides of Winchester Road. The base material, pavement, striping, and traffic loops should be completed this week, Winchester Road is scheduled to be opened to its ultimate width on May 19th. The project will consist of widening both the south and north sides of Winchester Road between Jefferson Avenue and the I-15 south bound ramps. pwO4~rpt~p~gb'~ney.mer 0511 1 Monthly Activity Report May 12, 1995 Pages 2 6. Traffic Signal at Margarita Road & Avenidx Berc-: This project is complete and staff will recommend the acceptance of this project at the next City Council meeting. This project is Federally funded and consists of the installation of a fully actuated traffic signal, signing and striping at the intersection of Margarita Road and Avenida Barca. 7. Moraga Road Street Widenins: A pre-construction meeting was held on May 8, 1995 and the contractor is expected to start work on May 15, 1995. This project includes the widening and restriping of Moraga Road between Margarlta Road and Rancho California Road, extending the two double box culverts an outlet structure, channel grading and landscaping. 8. SDorts Park Parking end Skate Board Park: A Contractor has been selected and Construction is expected to begin by the middle of June, 1995 and be completed by December, 1995. The improvements include grading, installation of irrigation, landscaping, roller hockey rink, skateboard park, sidewalk, rest room facility and parking lot. I!. WORK IN DESIGN 1. I-15/Winchester Road Interchange Modifications: The Project Report was approved by Caltrans on January 25, 1995. The plans and specifications have been signed by Caltrans. The City has retained the services of the Riverside County Real Property Branch to assist in the acquisition of right-of-way. Two (2) sections of property must be acquired for construction of the loop on-ramp. The project is on schedule for bid advertisement as soon as the property has been acquired. 2. Walcott Corridor: The third plan check has been returned to the consultant for corrections. The pla~s are expected to be resubmitted to the city by the end of this month. The letters for permission to grade and the easement documents for the acquisition of right-of-way have been sent to the adjacent property owners. The project will provide for two (2) travel lanes (total of 32' of pavement width) within the 66' wide dedicated right-of- way. The alignment will follow the existing right-of-way and accommodate a 30-mph design speed. The total length of the project is approximately 8,500 feet. This project will also include the relocation of Rancho California Water District's existing water main. pwO4~oUl~D~Sb'~may.mar 06/11 )95 Monthly Acbrvffy Report May 12., 1995 Pa~Ze 3 3. Sam Hicks Monument Perk Improvement Project: The City has received approval from the Riverside County EDA to solicit construction bids. The bid opening will be scheduled for the end of July, 1995. The construction activities are to be coordinated with the construction of the museum and church renovation projects. The improvements include the construction of a 950 square foot concession stand and rest room facility, an asphalt parking lot, landscaping and irrigation improvements, and assorted park site amenities. 4. P,,ncho Vista Road and Mira I omn r~rive Sidewalk Imnrovements: The design for this project is completed and staff will recommend that the City Council. authorize the Public Works Department to solicit public construction bids at the May- 23, 1995 Council Meeting. This project is funded from Senate Bill 821 funds for Fiscal Year 1994-95. The project consists of the installation of approximately 14,600 square feet of sidewalk on the northerly side of Rancho Vista Road between Mira Loma Drive and Santa Suzanne Drive, the easterly side of Mira Loma Drive between Rancho Vista Road and Santa Cecilia Drive, and the southerly side of Rancho Vista Road east of Avenida de la Reina. 5. Solane Way Storm Drain Iml)rovements - RFP No. ~6: Albert A. Webb Associates has been selected to provide design engineering services for the Solana Way storm drain improvements (Ynez Road to Acacia Park Resort Apartments). The improvements to be constructed include, but not limited to, grading, 78" main line storm drain, utility relocations, misc. structures, erosion control, and traffic control. The consultant will be submitting the plans and specifications for review on Monday, May 15, 1995. 6. I-1 51Rancho California Road Interchanae Modifications: The project plans and specifications are approximately 80% complete and will be resubmitted to Caltrans after the consultant completes the plans for the northbound off-ramp using the option which includes a 2:1 slope design and the purchase of additional right-of-way. 7. I-151Overland Drive Overcroseino Imorovements: The Project Report and Project Study Report have been reviewed and approved by Caitrans. The plans and specifications were submitted to Caltrans for final review on Friday, January 13, 1995 and comments should be returned to the consultant by the end of May. The structural plans have been submitted to Caltrans (Division of Structures) on Friday, January 6, 1995 for review and comments have been sent to J.F. Davidson's structural engineer for incorporation into the plans. The consultant is preparing the legal plats and descriptions of the properties that need to be acquired. pwO4~K~mT~aip~gb'~ney.mer 0611 1/95 Monthly Activity Report May 12, 1995 Pa,qe 4 8. Temecula Middle School lighting PrOject: A professional services contract was awarded to Dream Engineering, Inc. to prepare the plans and technical specifications for the sports field lighting at the Temecula Middle School. The engineer has received comments from the State Architect's Office and will revise the plans before submitting them to the City. The plans and specifications are expected to be ready for the solicitation of bids by the end of May, 1995. 9. Fmergencv Generator: A professional services contract was awarded to RWR Pascoe to prepare the plans and technical specifications for the emergency generator to be constructed at the: Community Recreation Center. The engineer is expected to return the plans and specifications by the end of May for second plan check. 10. Access Ramns: The design for this project is completed and staff will recommend that the City Council authorize the Public Works Department to solicit public construction bids at the May 23, 1995 Council Meeting. This project is funded from Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds and will modify 23 concrete handicap access ramps at various locations throughout the City to comply with the most recent Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. pwO4Vnoaet;t~p~gS%may.mar OSll I LAND DEVELOPMENT Monthly Activity Report Special Projects April, 1995 Submitted by: Joseph Kink Prepared by: Raymond A. Casey Date: May 8, 1995 FEMA/OES REIMBURSEMENT: Staff is continuing to coordinate with the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the State Office of Emergency Services (OES) representatives in seeking reimbursement for costs incurred by the City due to the January 1993 floods and ensuing disaster declaration. OES has reimbursed the City a total of ~952,832 to date. The total cumulative reimbursable amount is $1,080,996. Staff has also been coordinating with FEMA and OES in seeking reimbursement for costs incurred by the City due to the recent floods of January - March 1995. The total reimbursable amount being supported by the FEMA/OES field team is $175,863.59 for the Phase I disaster. Staff has also applied for over $140,000 in funding associated with the Phase II disaster. PARKVIEW SITE (PROJECT NO. PW93-09h Rough Grading construction is anticipated to begin toward the beginning of June 1995 and completed in early July 1995. ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 159 {AD 159): The AD 159 improvements, as listed, are at the following stages of construction: Temecula Creek is complete. Approval of Highway 79 South plans from Caltrans is expected in mid-June. Phase I construction (from Butterfield Stage Road to Avertida de Missions) is scheduled to begin on December 1995. The selection process for Pala Road's Request For Proposal for environmental consulting is complete. : Butterfield Stage Road/Nighthawk Pass is nearly complete. ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 161 (AD 1 61 ): Winchester Road (Area II) - estimated completion date is January 1996 Murrieta Hot Springs Road (West) - estimated completion date is mid-August 1995. ~" .;ALLE PINA COLADA BYPASS {PROJECT NO.94-16): The study has been forwarded to Metropolitan Water District (MWD) for their review. Staff has received comments from MWD and met with representatives to discuss the project. OLD TOWN ENTERTAINMFNT PROJFCT: The following engineering design/study projects associated with the Old Town Redevelopment Project are currently underway. RFP#27 - Phase I Western Bypass Corridor. The preliminary research portion of the project has been completed and Trans-Pacific Consultants, Inc. (TPC) is currently analyzing the alignment alternatives. RFP#28 - First Street Extension. The conceptual alignment is complete however, alternative bridge structures/types are undergoing review. The review includes a feasibility analysis of the construction costs and schedules. RFP#30 - Old Town Parking Study. The parking/circulation study is complete and will be incorporated into the Old Town Redevelopment Project and Westside Specific Plan. RFP#32 - Western Bypass Corridor Assessment District. The scope of the assessment district will be defined once the extent of the improvements associated with Phase I of the Western Bypass Corridor has been determined. At that time the recommended consultant will be presented to the City Council. The Old Town Redevelopment Project Environmental Impact Report and the Westside Specific Plan are scheduled for the May 15, 1995 Planning Commission public hearing. TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: MEMORANDUM Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Bred Buron, Maintenance Superintendent May 1, 1995 Monthly Activity Report - April 1995 The following activities were performed by Public Works Department, Street Maintenance Division in-house personnel for the month of April 1995: I. SIGNS II. III. IV. VI. A. Total signs replaced B. Total signs installed C. Total signs repaired TREES A. Total trees trimmed for sight distance and street sweeping concerns POTHOLES A. Total square feet of potholes repaired CATCH BASINS A. Total catch basins cleaned RIGHT-OF-WAY WEED ABATEMENT A. Total square footage for right-of-way abatement GRAFFITI REMOVAL A. Total locations B. Total S.F. STENCILING A. 117 new and repaintad legends B. 430 L.F. of red curb new and repaintad C. 1,792 S.F. of sandblasting/grinding VII. 5 8 12 49 826 138 84,900 -'20 3,932 MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT - April 1995 Page No. 2 Also, City Maintenance staff responded to 16 service order requests ranging from weed abatement, tree trimming, sign repair, A.C. failures, litter removal, and catch basin cleanings. This is compared to 22 service order requests for the month of March, 1995. The Maintenance Crew has also put in 31 hours of overtime which includes standby time, P.M. surveillance (weekends only), and ,response to street emergencies. I.P.S. STRIPINn AND STs-"NCILINn COMPANY has comoleted the foliowine: · 72,292 L.F. of new and repainted striping · 0 L.F, of sand blasting The total cost for I.P.S. striping services was $5,784.16 compared to $0.00 for March, 1995. PESTMASTER SERVIC;:S has comoleted the following: · 75 sites, 1,167,337 S.F. of right-of-way weed control, total cost $16,050.88 compared ,,, $10,203.78 for March, 1995. The total cost for Street Maintenance performed by Contractors for the month of April, 1995 was $45,420.70 compared to $79,206.60for the month of March, 1995. Account No. 5402 Account No. 5401 $45,420.70 $0.00 CC: Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects Raymond A. Casey, Principal Engineer - Land Development Martin C. Lauber, Traffic Engineer r:~ade~eUpt%95%04 q MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT - April 1995 Page No. 3 STREET MAINTENANCE CONTRACTORS The following contractors have performed the following projects for the month of April. Ar-Cnl INT NO. 540:~ MONTELEONE EXCAVATING: '... ~." ': DATE 4/21/95 04/13/95 04113/95 04/13/95 04/06/95 04/13/95 04/07/95 04/13/95 04/13/95 04/10/95 04/10/95 04/11/95 04105/95 04/11/95 04/11/95 04~06/95 04110/9 5 STREETIC HANNEIJBRI DG E John Warnet, Santiago, Liefar Walcott Pina Colads North General Kearney Del Rey Road Margarita Road Diaz Road Closure Rancho California Road Rancho Vista Road Del Rio Pala Road Wolf Lane Calla Chapos El Lucero/Jedediah Smith Margarita Road La Paz Road Pauba Road Santiago RoadlC Street DESCRIPTION OF WORK Various Blade Work Backfill Backfill Backfill Backfill Backfill Shoulder Grade Backfill Backfill erosion Backfill Backfill Backfill Backfill Backfill Backfill Backfill Remove curb and gutter TOTALCOST ~672.00 $1,231.75 $307.75 $431.00 $493.00 $307.75 $246.50 ~965.50 $677.50 $869.50 $1,417.00 $369.00 $1,478.25 $592.25 $215.50 $254.75 $1,652.66 r:%roade%a~t;t~gb'~04 ekg MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT - April 1995 Page No. 4 DATE 04/09/95 04/26/95 NELSON PAVING ' ' · STREET/CHANNEL/BRIDGE Rancho Vista Road 31010 Pescado Drive 43195 Business Park Drive DESCRIPTION OF WORK Remove and Replace Total A.C. - 50 Tons Total S.F. - 2,952 Remove & Replace Asphalt Pad Total A.C. - 18 Tons-' Total S.F. - 1,016 TOTAL COST e6,453,00 $3,285.00 CAUFORNIA'LANDSCAPECO. "" DATE STREET/CHANNEI:/BRIDGE 04/28/95 Santiago Road MURRIETA DEVELOPMENT CO. DATE STREET/CHANNEL/BRIDGE 04/27/95 DESCRIPTION OF WORK Weed abatement/remove debris DESCRIPTION OF WORK Form and pour trapezoidal channel Total S.F. - 260 TOTALCOST $444.00 TOTALCOST $1,222,00 r:%roede~ctrpt~gSM)4 ekg DATE' 04-04-95 04-05-95 04-06-95 04-10-95 04-10-95 04-13-95 04-13-95 04-14-95 04-14-95 04-14-95 04-14-95 04-17-95 04-21-95 04-21-95 04-21-95 04-26-95 04-28-95 04-28-95 04-28-95 04-28-95 ....:,.. · :";: LOCATION Tower Plaza Winchester Road ~ I-15 30460 Shenandoah Court Ave. de la Reins {b Calla Aragon Main Street ~ Bridge Camino Verde ~ Camino del Este Rustic Glen Sidewalk 28120 Front Street 2723 Madison Bank of Commerce ~) Front Street 28120 From Street Camino Verde @ Camino del Este Santa Gertrudis Channel Main Street Bridge Rancho California Road @ Target Center Southern Cross' ~ Rancho Vista 28485 6th Street Little Flower Pre-School 6th ~ Pujol 28496 Pujol CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION GRAFFITI REMOVAL - APRIL, 1995 · ,: · .. .; ~.~' '. ,. IRemoved Removed Removed Removed Removed Covered San Blasted Removed IRemoved IRemoved Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed Removed 'WORK COMPLETED: i',, :. ,": ': ,," i':' 80' S.F. of Graffiti 15 S.F. of Graffiti 100 S.F. of Graffiti 2 S.F. of Graffiti :5 S.F. of Graffiti 315 S.F. of Graffiti 35 S.F. of Graffiti 38 S.F. of Graffiti 96 S.F. of Graffiti 75 S.F. of Graffiti 2,000 S.F. of Greffiti 24 S.F. of Graffiti 220 S.F. of Graffiti 662 S.F. of Graffiti 10 S.F. of Greffiti 10 S.F. of GrafWci 75 S.F. of Graffiti 100 S.F. of Greffiti 60 S.F. of Graf~t.i 10 S.F. of Graffiti TOTAL LOCATIONS I TOTAL S.F. I DATE 04-06-95 04-06-95 04-07-95 04-07-95 04-10-95 04-10-95 /J}4-.13-95 ~-13-95 04-20-95 04-25-95 04-26-95 04-26-95 LOCATION Calla Pins Coleda Calle Pins Coleda ~) N, Gen'l Kearney Pale Road ID) Hen/, 79 South Pale Road 0 Hwy. 79 South Corta Anza () Calla Aragon CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION WORK COMPLETED-APRIL, 1995 SIGNS/INSTALLED/MAINTAINED Replaced Replaced Avenida de le Reins Ave. Barca 0 Margarita Road Hwy. 79 North (51) Nicolee Road Pale Road N/O Loma Linda Via Gilberto ~) Pashaho Via Norte E/O Ave. Centenario Del Ray ~i) Ave. del Reposo WORK COMPLETED 10 Foot Barricade 'N" Marker "Graffiti" Replaced Removed Installed Maintained Removal Removal Installed Replaced Repaired Repaired S.N.S. i R-1 C.!.P. Signs (2) SPS/S.N.S. R-1 (Loose Round Post) Emergency Access R-1 (2) New Signals R-1 S.N.S. (1) New Signal 2 W-17 2 R-1 4 R-1-A R-1 & S.N.S. 2 R-2-35 W-7 R-2-35 R-26 5 TOTAL SIGNS REPLACED 8 TOTAL SIGNS INST/q I R~ 1 · TOTAL SIGNS REPNRED CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION WORK COMPETED APRIL, 1995 DEBRIS REMOVAL DATE 04-11-95 04-11-95 04-11-95 04-11-95 04-11-95 04-11-95 04-11-95 04-11-95 04-11-95 · 04-11-95 04-11-95 04-11-95 04-12-95 Diaz NIO Winchester Road Business Park Drive Front Street ~ 6th Street Jedediah Smith @ Cabrillo Jedediah Smith @ De Portola De Portola ~ Del Sur De Portola ~ Margarita Jedediah Smith @ Pescado Calla Valado W/O Pescado Ynez Street @ Santiago Ynez Street @ Rancho Vista Road Rancho Vista Road Margarita Road Front Street N/O 5th Street Sand Removal Rocks in flowline Sand on S.W. Sand in flowline Sand in flowline Sand in flowline Sand in flowline Sand in flowline Sand in R.W. Sand in SW/RAC Sand on SW/RAC Sand on SW/RAC Sand on Sidewalk . WORK COMPLETED '.~' 2 yards 114 yard I yard I 1/2 yards I 112 yards 314 yard 20 yards (3 locations) 1/2 yard 114 yard I cubic yard -1- pwO3%roadettwkenltSlO4,1)EBRIS 060296 )>=RRIS REMOVAL- APRIL, 1995 04-13-95 Via Los Colima @ Rancho California Road Sand in flowline 3 cubic yard 04-13-95 04-13-95 04-13-95 04-13-95 From Street ~ Texaco Vallejo Avenue ~ Ynez Road Margarita Road E/O Post Office Rancho Vista Road EIO Margarita Road Sand in SW Sand in flowline Sand on SW Sand on S.W. 1,250 1/4 2 5 S.F. yard yards yards 04-13-95 04-13-95 Rancho Vista W/O Southern Cross Lyndie Lane W/O Margarita Sand in flowline Erosion 1/4 yard 3 yards (filled) -2- pwO3~woads%wkomplM~5%O4.DEBRIS 060296 DATE 04-03-95 04-03-95 04-03-95 04-05-95 04-06-95 04-10-95 04-11-95 04-12-95 Area 2 Area 3 Area 4 Area 2 Area 2 Area 2 Area 2 Area 2 LOCATION CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION WORK COMPLETED - APRIL, 1995 PAINTING/STENCILING Stop Bar 2 Stop Legend 2 Stop Bar 4 Stop Legend 6 Stop Bar 3 Stop Legend 3 Stop Bar 3 Stop Legend 3 Stop Bar 6 Stop Legend 6 Stop Bar 9 Stop Legend 9 Stop Bar 8 Stop Legend 13 Stop Bar 2 Stop Legend 7 - WORK COMPLETED" 90 SF Grinding X-Walk 1 225 SF Grinding 45 SF Grinding 140 SF Grinding Arrow 2 45 2 25 2 270 SF Grinding 225 SF Grinding "35" I 360SF Grinding 212 SF Grinding DIP 2 X-Walk I 04-20-95 04-24-95 04-25-95 04-27-95 Pala Road @ Loma Linda Area 2 Vigo Court @ Southern Cross Area 2 Installed Grind & repainted Grind & repainted Repainted 8 Legends 10 Legends 180SF Grinding 2 Legends 45SF Grinding 430 L.F. of red curb TOTAL NEW AND REPAINTED STENCILS TOTAL L.F.NEW AND REPAINTED RED CURB TOTAL S.F. OF GRINDING/ SANDBLASTING 117 : 1.79~ CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION WORK COMPLETED APRIL, 1995 CA TCH BASINS DATE 04-17-95 04-18-95 04-19-95 04-24-95 LOCATION' ':' I :" ":~::~""'j'WORK COMPLETED Areas 81,82, 83 & 84. Areas 81,82, 83 & 84 Areas 81,82, 83 & 84 Santiago ~) S. Warner I Cleaned I Cleaned i Cleaned Cleaned 37 Catch Basins 84 Catch Basins 15 Catch Basins 2 Catch Basins TOTAL ;ATCH 3ASIN$ ;LEANED 138 -1- pwO3Voed$~wb=mpitd~b"104.C8 060196 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION WORK COMPLETED - APRIL, 1995 R.O.W. WEED ABATEMENT DATE 04-03-95 04-03-95 04-06-95 04-07-95 I 04-12-95 04-21-95 04-27-95 04-27-95 04-27-95 04-28-95 LOCATION. I" '<'::" :''!':''' Via Lobo ~) Channel Abated Via Lobo Westside Abated Pina Colada ~) N, Abated General Kearney Via Lobo Channel I Abated From Street Abated NIO 6th Street Rancho California Road Abated W/O Park Drive From Street SIO Abated Rancho California Road From Street @ Abated 6th Street Main Street Bridge Abated 6th Street ~ Abated .'.:.= '.W~)hK'COMPLET~D' 3,000 14,000 200 50 :3,000 750 60,000 3,000 400 500 S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds S.F. of R.O.W. Weet,.~.i S.F. of R.O.W. Weeds 84.900 TOTAL S.F.R.O.W. WEED ABATEMENT -1- p/OSVosd,%wbnq~bSW.S~O4.Wsd, OS01~ DATE 04-06-95 04-10-95 04-19-95 04-20-95 04-21-95 04-24-95 /-0.4-24-95 . ,-24-95 04-24-95 04-25-95 04-25-95 04-25-95 04-25-95 04-26-95 04-27-95 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS LOCATION ROADS DIVISION TREE TRIMMING APRIL, 1995 ,;~ .... ~ ,. ~ "' Pine Colads ~) N, General Kearney 6th Street ~ Pujol Street Pujol Street N/O 6th Street Pala Road N/O Loma Linda Rancho California Road W/O Park Drive 40751 Carmelita Circle 30355, 30410 & 30380 Del Rey Medusa ~) La Serena Camino Romo Bay Hill ~ Olympic Bay Hill (i) Clubhouse Consuelo @Pala Road San Fermin Race @ Margarita Rancho Vista & El Greco Margarita Road N/O La Serene ": · :WORK COMPLETED Row Sight Diet. OH R.O,W. Trimmed OH R,O,W, Trimmed Trimmed Trimmed Trimmed Trimmed Trimmed Trimmed Trimmed Trimmed Trimmed Trimmed Trimmed Trimmed 5 Trees 2 Trees 7 Trees 6 Trees 1 Tree 3 Trees 5 Trees I Tree 2 Trees 2 Trees 4 Trees I Tree I Tree 2 Trees 7 Trees d TOTAL TREES TRIMMED 49 TRAFFIC DIVISION Monthly Activity Report For April, 1995 Submitted by: Joseph Kicak~-~ Prepared by: Marry Lauber Date: May 15, 1995 I. TRAFFIC REnUESTS TRAFFIC 'REQUESTS: Feb. March April Received 9 4 3 Completed 5 3 0 Under Investigation 8 10 17 Scheduled for Traffic Commission I 3 2 II. DIVISION PROJECTS: The Traffic Division has completed the first step in the refinements to the Southwest Area Planning District (SWAPD) Travel Forecast Model. The updated model will be used for the I-15/I-215 Corridor Study and could be used to predict land usa change traffic impacts. Traffic Division staff, and a representative from Temecula Community Services District (TCSD), have invited Caltrans Highway Operations staff to provide advise regarding the crossing of State Route 79(N) by the Santa Gertrudis Creek multi-purpose trail. Many alternatives were discussed on-site, with all being ruled out except for an at-grade crossing in the trails current alignment. Caltrans will be researching appropriate traffic controls recommended to provide the highest level of safety for both motorized and non-motorized transportation. Ce The Public Works Department celebratedthe successful completion of two (2) major traffic signal installations. The energizing of the Nicolas Road/Winchest.er Road and Avenida Barca/Margarita Road traffic signals were a significant accomplishment, thanks to our Capital Improvement Division. De The exclusive right-turn lane completed on State Route 79(S) at Pala Road, was initiated by the Traffic Division and brought to completion by, the diligence and team work of the Maintenance and Capital Improvement Divisions. Ee As part of the Public Works Department's on-going participation in the two Assessment District projects, Traffic Division staff has reviewed roadway marking plans and five (5) ultimate traffic signal plans for State Route 79. c~mcup~a.drsc~5~Ol .m~r TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ITEM 1 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT HELD MAY 9, 1995 A regular meeting of the Temecula Community Services District was called to order at 8:06 PM at the Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. President Ron Robarts presiding. ROLL CALL PRESENT: 5 ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: Lindemans, Mu~oz, Parks, Stone, Roberrs DIRECTORS: None Also present were General Manager Ronald E. Bradley, General Counsel Peter Thorson and City Clerk June S. Greek. PUBLIC COMMENTS None given. CONSENT CALENDAR It was moved by Director Parks, seconded by Director Stone to approve Consent Calendar Item No. 1. The motion carried as follows: AYES: 5 DIRECTORS: NOES: 0 DIRECTORS: ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: Minutes 1.1 1.2 Lindemans, Mu~oz, Parks, Stone, Roberrs None None Approve the minutes of April 11, 1995. Approve the minutes of April 25, 1995. DISTRICT BUSINESS Minutee.ced~OSO995 TCSD ProDosed Rates and CharQes for FY 1995-96 Director of Community Services Shawn Nelson presented the staff report. Director Stone abstained based on his ownership of a home in Service Level R. -1- Sam Pratt, 40470 Brixton Cove, spoke in opposition to any increase in TCSD Rates and Charges. Director Stone reported that the City of Temecula has been proactive in reducing fees for its citizens and announced that this year the REST program, (Revenue, Excess Sharing in Temecule) will be implemented end citizens of Temecula will receive $4.70 credited toward this year's TCSD rates and charges per household, effectively reducing the annual increase to $1.38 for the net levy. It was moved by Director Parks, seconded by Director Lindemans to approve staff recommendation as follows: 2.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. CSD 95-02 ** A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ON THE FILING OF A REPORT ON THE PROPOSED RATES AND CHARGES FOR FISCAL YEAR 1995-96 AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING IN CONNECTION THEREWITH 2.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. CSD 95-03 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AMENDING THE PROCEDURES FOR APPEALING THE APPLICATION OR IMPLEMENTATION OF RATES AND CHARGES AGAINST PROPERTY WITHIN THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT The motion was unanimously carried with Director Stone abstaining. Namina of Park and Recreation Facilities Director of Community Services Shawn Nelson presented the staff report. Director Parks expressed concern that the parks named after the two Sister Cities were small and asked if they will create a good impression to visiting dignitaries..' President Roberts stated it is a small token of appreciation and it will be appreciated. Minutes.cs~l%050995 -2- It was moved by Director Lindemans, seconded by Director Stone to approve staff recommendation to name the two (2) quarter-acre parks on Nicolas Road "Voorburg Park" and "Nakayama Park", the park site on Nicolas Road and North General Kearny Road "Nicolas Road Park", the park site at De Portola and Butterfield Stage Roads "Butterfield Stage Park" and the twenty-acre community park west of the Temecula Elementary School "Margarita Community Park". The motion was unanimously carried. GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT None given. DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT None given. BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS None given. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Director Lindemans, seconded by Director Parks to adjourn at 8:33 PM, to a meeting on May 23, 1995, 8:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. The motion was unanimously carried. Ron Roberts, President ATTEST: June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk Minutes.cs~l%050995 -3- ITEM 2 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROV CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFI CITY MANAG CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT Board of Directors Ronald E. Bradley, General Manager May 23, 1995 Acceptance of Landscape Maintenance Areas and Residential. Street Lighting· .. PREPARED BY: ~ RECOMMENDATION: Beryl Yasinosky, Management Assistant That the Board of Directors: Accept the deeds for the TCSD landscape maintenance areas and direct the City Clerk to record the documents. 2. Accept Tract 22762 into the Rancho Highlands landscape maintenance rate level· 3. Accept residential street lights. BACKGROUND: Prior to the beginning of each new fiscal year, staff reviews applications from developers requesting to dedicate street lighting and perimeter slope areas into the TCSD maintenance programs. The energy costs for residential street lighting are transferred into Service Level B and perimeter landscaping and slope areas are maintained through Service Level C. Several developers have filed applications to dedicate perimeter slopes and landscaping into the TCSD maintenance program beginning July 1,1995. The slope areas have been inspected by the Maintenance Superintendent and are acceptable to TCSD standards. The attached easement and grant deeds for the respective landscape and open space areas have been reviewed to ensure that all legal requirements have been satisfied. In addition, the Rancho Highlands Homeowners Association Board (HOA) has formally requested that Tract 22762 be accepted into the existing TCSD landscape maintenance program and rate level for their development. Tract 22762 is within the jurisdiction of the aforementioned HOA and receives benefit from the perimeter landscaping. Inclusion of this tract into the maintenance program also distributes the maintenance costs to a larger area, thereby reducing the overall charge to each property owner· A copy of the HOA board meeting minutes and subsequent request letter are attached for your review. Therefore, the legal documents effecting the following tracts are being recommended for acceptance and recordation: Service m evel C 2. 3. 4. 5. Tract 21675-0: Village Grove Tract 22762-0: Rancho Highlands Tracts 22916-0, 22916-1, and 22916-2: Vintage Hills Tract 22148-0: Mirada Tract 25004-1: Barclay Estates Staff is also recommending the acceptance of residential street lights into TCSD Service Level B, as follows: Service Ievel B 1· Tract 22762-0 7. Tract 24131-1 2. Tract 22916-3 8. Tract 24131-2 3. Tract 23100-3 9. Tract 24133-0 4. Tract 23101-2 10. Tract 24135-2 5. Tract 23125-1 11. Tract 24135-2 6. Tract 23483-0 FISCAL IMPACT: Acceptance of the slopes and street lighting will be incorporated into the TCSD Rates and Charges for Fiscal Year 1995-96. Costs for maintaining the slope areas will be included into Service Level C. The energy costs for residential street lighting will be included into Service Level B. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Landscape Easement Deeds. 2. Correspondence from Rancho Highlands HOA. c~deobi'dmdfie. ad OS2~S March I, 1995 COMMUNITY MANAGEMENT A division of RBCM, Inc. Mr. Shawn Nelson Community Services Director City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 RANCHO HIGHLANDS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION - LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE (Service Levd C) Dear Shawu: Please be advised that the above referenced Association has added an additional tract to the commuajty. Accordingly, we ere requesting that the City of Temecula include Tract 22762 as a pan of Service Level C. I have enclosed a copy of the "Declaration of Annexation" conveying this property to the Association. The Board of Directors will be meeting on March 16, 1995 and will ratify acceptance at this time. A copy of the minutes from that meeting will follow shortly. We hope this is adequate information to process this request. Should additional information be required, please don't hesitate to contact me at (909) 699-1220. Sincerely, Administrative Assistant Elite Community Management for RANCHO HIGHLANDS COMMUNqTY ASSOCIATION enclosure cc: Bill Cecil, President; Board of Directors SK/s 11717 Bernardo Plaza Ct., Suite 205 San Diego, CA 92 128 Business: (619) 485-0881 · Service: (619) 485-0672 FAX: (619) 485-7844 Business: 27710 Jefferson Ave., Suite 106 Temecula, CA 92590 (909) 699-1220 · Accounting: (909) 699-4225 FAX: (909) 699-1661 March 22, 1995 COMMUNITY MANAGEMENT A division of RBCM, Inc. Mr. Shawn Ndson Community Services Dkector City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 liE: RANClIO HIGHIAN1)S COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION - TRACT 22762 Dear Shawn: As stated in our letter of March 1, 1995 rerardizl inclusion of Tract 22762 into the above referenced association, we have enclosed copies of the minutes from the March 16, 1995 meeting of the Board of Directors. Should you require additional information, as always, please don't heistate to contact our office at (909) 699-1220. Sincerely, Admini-~trative Assistant Elite Commqnjty Mana2ement for RANCHO HIGHLANDS COMMUNITY .ASSOCIATION enclosure cc: fie SK/s 11717 Bemardo Plaza Ct.,'Suite 205 San Diego, CA 92128 Business: (619) 485-0881 o Service: (619) 485-0672 FAX: (619) 485-7844 27710 Jefferson Ave., Suite 106 Temecula, CA 92590 Business: (909) 699-1220 · Accounting: (909) 6994225 FAX: (909) 699-1661 'RANCHO"mGHLANDS' COMMU T..Y.ASSOCIATION MEErmG:.O DmscroRs Lampkin, sergeatit-at~iL:Michae~'V~d0r; :Anthony~h Andreola, St., and Shari Kuwahara, Representing'Elite CommUnitY' Management; Sevet=al Homeowners. Absent: .Candace Spenc~;. Secretary ORDER "' ' The meeting WaS called to =order:st='6:42 p.m. by Mr. Bill Cecil, President. The BOard,. upoRlnoti0n th~3~.:~e alld seconded, voted upnnlrnous|y to approve the minutes of '- the February '16i =1995:'tegiila~' meeting as submitted. FINANCIAl. REPORT :':.' Financial Statement .Review i:!~.:' :: :!. Mr..LeBlanc tevieweii the '~ial statement ending February 28, 1995. Account balances and lindget. compari,~n....tep~rts. ~vere:i. reviewed. It was riotiff that the fence painting at the rec center · had .be~n miSc0ded;"'Manag~t to code this item from structural maintenane, e to current year disbursements...: : . ::.::...:: Ms:. Andreola .teviewed':'four'::aCeounts wl~ieh are over 90 days. 107054-I084 -iSmail clainiS:.'!~iion has been filed against this homeowner, with a court date of ~3/22/95. at ·1·:30 'p;m. 'Manag~ent requested a volunteer from the Board to appear on behalf of the Association.' 'There .:were: n0; volunteers at this time. 107os-4,258-i...~..M~sgementii~:noted that this homeowner had been fined previously and is- scheduled for a hearing at the ·April 20, 1995 Board of Directors' meeting. 99999-6-262-i .- Maxiagement..'-had filed for small claims action and discovered that the costs involved to. collect against th~ .judgement previously received would come close to equalling the current amount owed. Ilp0n':nmtion duly made and seconded, the Board voted unanimously to write off $251:59 as uncollectible debt. 999994-34~-I -. Management rep0rt~. that .this fonner.~owner had filed bankruptc7 .and. y~e were waiting for the discharge :before :taking ~ny. action.. :...' =.="i'..'i'.' .~.='-:: ' '=.= - ..........i..... · :::... i'. · ....-..... hncho Highhinds' '~nmuni~y ~socittiou Board of'.!)iFec~ors 'Meeting. · 'Manegemen~'Report '..:.'.. '. . .... · " · Matmgem~ nO~ed that~heSe items' W~Uldbe addreSsed.'individUali~e under old business. · ': F~per~r ~lr~pection RQ~ort~ · . Managementideferred.this repOrtito Mr. Chichester, the Committee Chairperson to report under the appropriate section of. the. agenda. .... ' "' .~ This ~item. was .passed over in the int~est of time. There were no items requiring Board attention. · ....:i: . ..:: .... ~TkrchitecturaFiC6ntrol Committee ::.=. ' .. :'.:.. :. :'..'..i..~'.: Mrs,'.:D~Ub =~q3o~t~d that the Committee had received eight applications during the last month. Six · ".::"....!=.: ~...=!."': :.~!::~a.~ were disapproved. Mr. Hnnk VandenBrook has begun the parking inspections :.'. := .: ..' ..' ;Mr:..~:i'a~ii .B~n~ies has resigned from the ACC. He has served since the inception of the ...... · .....commit~:'.'=b~,~='h'is business activities have made him unable to continue to participate on this · :. 'Upoh..moti0O'..il~ily made and seconded, the Board voted unanimously to accept Mr. Barry Rehm .. .= .to rephCe'Mt'i...'~Onavries on the AC..C. ........ ' = 'Mr~ '=.'Chi~eSter=· reviewed the latest property inspection report with the Board and members present. '=." =There== were nO =qUestions regarding this report. · . Nomination=C0~ttee ":"..':'...'MrS;'..SpenCe".WaS not present, so no report was given. · :' Recreafjon 'C0tranittee :No report .WaS"given at this time. 'OLD:BUSINESS · .Cormramify survey Result-q/Update Management reported .to the 'membership that 31 ..su,eys=.'h~! .been =received out of 294 ·sent·out. Management noted that there was.no significant change fr6in'l~t month. Lot .t6=Wrou~ht Iron/Wood F~nCing .Pil~t~'=Pain~in~'UPdate ='=.." In the interesq.'of time,' this.item'was tabled ~m'I ~e .neXt ~.b0ard tni~ing.. -Z Randto Highlands' CommnnitY Association :Board of Directors Meeting Minutes ' ' March 16, 1995 Page- 3- · ' : =.~4~-~it,~ment Contract:Ren~a~.. · :Management had:previously pro~ided~the B0ard With a..nmv C0ntract'f~r the period March l, 1995== through FebrUary. 29,. i996. .Upon motion duly made and Seconded, :the Board voted unanimously to approve the new contraa at the sameper unit charge as'the previous contract. Mr. Cecil noted to the.memberS :present~ that thereis a thirty day cancellation clause that either party may use if it feels the other is not performing satisfactorily. Recreation Center Gates' · =' .... Management .prOvided the. Board with':thz~ bids 'forzthe installation=of new gates at the recreation ~.~". cente~.""rnis'.itm WaS.:~bl~::~.m~:ineXt'.board 'm~gL: '. · ::':. · .." ...... . '. '::" . .' ...... ..~' ... .: .. '. ~...-..:...::: '. :!'.:. · ":.~..:: .i:i!'.':. '.' ~'::.::.i...' :i:: ' ........ S~rity":Uids.'.'. :i: ::'........ .....i.... .... ::... ::.... ...i ::: Managemeat pr0vided::the' ~ard': wi~':.~ ii~ids fot:..s~curity patrols, randomly, eight time~ an · evening,.'friday~..:samrday, .and :SUnd~y;':betweea the"!aouts. of:.10:0o.p.m~: and dawn. Foot patrol ~voUld"be made. in .the .pool, re~i~ooms~.'tennis: courts, .anti green :ibe. tt'areas~:.::. Upon .motion ·duty .... · . '~75'~00...Mr... Cecil directedi Management 'to i.ensure the. contract comained .a thirty day cancellation .' ·:.~lan~e. :: '.":"':- · ·· "' · """ "' .':" · ' "' ,,,--- . Z:..: . ....: .. :..: ': . . . .. Z · Z - . . ' .. · i '." · ': ' · . . . ....:. · ... ."' . Z : . :...':.. :.:ii .:.....'~. ~.i~o~'! ~~' ':~em~ ".'~~ d~:.:~" ~f: : .i:.'... '..i.......::devi~.whidi::inightbe.imaU~it-'t0.~U~n~tsecutitY:::Patr~s. :.'i:.:'::.:'.:~.~:.:'..:'i.~:."..~::i "..':"'· ' ' :..'.:":: :'..'. ..:. . .': ' · :. . · ': . .' '.: ... '..' '.' ..:. :. '.'~'!'! :.: .: ~'i.:'..~ .' . "..".:" ":'.. i.: i.~'W~-~u~'.'." ' .'":' :"'"' '." .."::":": ..':' ':''.:':"": .:':::::"':::':" ' ·:'.: :' ....' ·" "" ' ' '. '" ' :"' :." . ."'i.. :"::':."..i.:." ''' · Acceptance .of Tract 22762 ...... .. '. ..... .. .....~ uo~. upon..,,,otio,,-.dU~ymale ~' ~i~d~' ~d..,,~,iii~o~a~,' t~'.:~pt .t~a,:t 22?6~-imo · . the .Association." " · .... :' ' ' .' " ~" .~i:' ." · ,.mo~' ..:' · .. .' '.'~... .: :' ..:election:at'?.~!p~m:":b~:-.Mr:.:"Ce~il, P~sident." :' '." .' ":':.: .::' :..~. '..:.'::....... ": i..':.' · ' .. · . . '. ..~.~ '.' ... . ..... .: :. ' ...:. ".:.. [.. ..'...':" · . .. 'Z!': .'. . ..... .. . ... "" :"":~rep~ea by .... ""'' · : ......· .:. · .~l~te Convnun~ Management ~r-~ORDZZ~TG I~Q~ BY: FIRST ,a2vlE3flCA,~ ~ COMPANy ~ i~CORDI~D MAIL TO: WAMCO, Inc. do W~ Vema,e Company .I. ST .~rrRIC~N ~002/00; NOTICE OF A-NNEXA~O~r I~-,EGIZALS: : .. . ~. · w. % covetous, c°etfions smd resuictions as~forth~aad a~l~sabjectW · bi~rm w WAMCO, In&, a Nn, ada · b/a WA~CO Real BY: - ~~ ~J -- rfS: ?~'--'~4r-~ t- 73.4 788 23S8 ELITE C~I~ITY ~IGMT 1ST AIE/IC,~ TZ'L ~003 EXI-~R_IT °A- Lots 28 through 45 iudu,s/ve of Trac:t ~ou~h ~6 ~.M~,~_o~ orRive~d~~,~ ~l~L~p on F~ in Book 240, C" STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTy OF On .r/k/~/,e, ~ f/4~/,./, _, before me,_ t,4,q.~-/lt~ Z. :;z"'~'7$v,c/.4 Personally appear'e~ ,t2r, /~.,.r ¥ ."T-- .'~/,4 y;, ~,,; /r!.//.,;~.;,. ' ' ( r p,ove{~ tcme on-tho ~t. si~. ~f ~atiafa~cry evid~ ~ , Personally known tO me O C,e) to~'~Dbe ' Person(s} whose name($)-is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that~hc/sho/they executed the same in J3iiB~/their authorized caPacitydes). and ~ by his/hsr/theirsignature(s) on the instnm~nt the I;}emon(s) or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s} acted, executed the instrumenL WITNESS my hand an~ offiP..iaJ seal, Slgnatur~///7~.~~~~~, --, -. ~-., :. ';-'-_, . . , i' TrUe of Document .M o~f~ ~ 0 [ ' ~er sig~at~ not a~!ed~ ~/~No. ~ Pag~ 3 Recorded at request of and return to: Department of Building Services Real Property Management Division 3133 7~h Street Riverside, California 902507 FREE RECORDING This instrument is for t/le benefit of the County of Riverside and is entitled to be recorded without fee. (Govt. Code 6103) ~ty of Temecula Community Service Districttin behalf .of C.S.A. 143 ("GRANTEE"), together with the right to further grant or transfer the same to others, a perpetual easement and right-of- way for maintaining, operating, altering, repairing, and replacing equipment and landscaping over and within the boundaries of that certain real property located in the County of R~verside, State of California, more particularly described in Exhibit "A" and shown in Exhibit "B" attached hereto, which is incorporated herein by this reference (the "Easement Area"). If GRANTEE, or its governmental entity, successors, or assigns, determines it is unable, incapable, or unwilling to maintain said Easement Area, maintenance shall, after notice, become the responsibility of GRANTOR, with all covenants and agreements of this easement extending to and becoming obligations of all heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the GRANTOR. DATED /_f'. 7160019 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) SS. On before me, the ~tarVPublic in and for State, personally appeared undersigned, a BARBARA A. ROBINET OFRC/AL NOTARYSEAL · ' resMAY31.1994 du~s s ~ Jose h ~z;~od~..$andsaYs~hat he ~nsb'umenlasawitnessb,.~reto who · Notan/). the and S lvla M (he/she) was Present and sa: . being to within ins execute the same, and that said affiant to !he w~e~d annexed in- na~. t~ntos trumentasa witness at the mquest of THIS CERT/RCATE onnauon * TO THE DOCUMENT Number of Pages_ DESCRIBED AT RIGHT: Date S/gner(s) Other Than Named Above _ of Document deed.csa August 24, 1990 ~e. 'RO. EXHIBIT "A" ~ Legal Description: Those portions of Lot 50 of Tract Number 22148 in the unincorporated territory of Riverside County, as recorded June 22, 1989 in Book 202 of Maps, at Pages 92-104, records of said county, state of California, lying within a portion of Section 29, Township 7 South, Range 2 West, San Bernardino Base and Principal Meridian, more particularly described as follows: EASEMF~ AREA "A" BEGINNING at the most southerly corner of said Lot 50, in the northwesterly line of LaSerena Way 88.00 feet wide; thence,' along the southwesterly line of said Lot 50, North 47041,03" West 23.22 feet to a point; thence, leaving said southwesterly line of said Lot 50, o North 74 11'00" East 68.83 feet; thence, North 38°35'02" East 20.00 feet; thence, North 69°25'58" East 5.14 feet to the southwesterly line of Calle Medusa 66.00 feet wide; thence, along said southwesterly line, South 20°34'02" East 20.82 feet; thence, continuing along the easterly line of said Lot 50, South 26031'48'' West 33.77 feet to a point in the northwesterly line of said La Serena Way; thence, along said northwesterly line of said Le Serena Way, South 71e15'58" West 55.61 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said easement contains 1,396 square feet more or less. lot50.eas August 24, 1990 BEGINNING at the most southerly corner of said Lot 50, in the northwesterly line of La Serena Way S8.00 feet wide; thence, North 71°15'58" East 55.61 along said northwesterly line; thence, continuing along the southeasterly line of said Lot 50, North 26°31'48" East 33.77 feet; thence, leaving said southeasterly line, North 69°25'58" East 5.00 feet~ thence, South26°31'48" West 41.10 feet~ thence, South71~15'58" West 52.64 feet to the southwesterly line of said Tract Number 22148~ thence, along said southwesterly line North 47~41'03" West 5.71' to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said easement contains 398 square feet more or less. L.S. 593 Llc nse E 1res 12/31/927 lot50.eas August 24, 1990 EXHIBIT" B" Recorded at request of and return to: DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING SERVICES Real Property Management Division 3133 7th Street Riverside, California 902507 FREE RECORDING This instrument is for the benefit of the County of Riverside and is entitled to be recorded without fee. (Govt. Code 6103) Parcel: Project: FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, __ ("GRANTOR") hereby grants and conveys to the City of Temecula Community Service District in behalf of C.S.A. 143 C'GRANTEE'), together with the dght to further grant or transfer the same to others, a revocable easement and right-of-way for maintaining, operating, altering, repairing, and replacing equipment and landscaping over and within the boundaries of that certain real property located in the County of Riverside, State of California, more particularly described in Exhibit 'A' and shown in Exhibit 'B" attached hereto, which is incorporated herein by this reference (the 'Easement Area'). If GRANTEE, or its governmental entity, successors, or assigns, determines it is unable, incapable, or unwilling to maintain said Easement Area, maintenance shall, after notice, become the responsibility of GRANTOR, 'with all covenants and agreements of this easement extending to and becoming obligations of all heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the GRANTOR. DATED STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) SS · SUBSCRIBING-WITNESS ACKNOWLEDGMENT ("WITNESS JURAT") S~te of California Coun~ of San Diego } SS. OFFICIAL NOTARY SEA[. BARBARA A RO~NET No~rYPutic--C/txr~ SAN DIEGO COUNTY My Cornre. Ex~res MAY31,1994 Onbh~ffie ~.w-a dayof D,=t, emher 19 qO ~beforerne. U~eunder~gned NotaWPu~c, bersondyappemed John Slatton (narneofsubsc~ngwm'mas), ~ personaey known to me [] proved~rneon~eoaffi/afSrma~onof John SlatCon (name of cmdib~ ~ wffi'~SS who kJen~es subsc~b~g ~4b~ess), a cred~e vaness wh(xn I know person~y, he Oymeddyswom. deposes and says bhat (he/she) was present and saw Tom Hornbeak and Gayle Horn~of ~nd~ ragnet not appearing before s~'ument as a pady ~ereto. execute fie same, and fiat sad affiant subscribed he (h~/her) ~o~eaw~m ~s~urnent as a v~fiess at fie request ofT°m Hornbeak and Gayle l(name of pdnc~t s~ner again) '~h~LL~ ~ - (No~y's s~nature) ATrENTION NOTARY: .Nthough the information requested bek~w is OFTIONAL, it could Ibmvent fraudulent attachment of this celfficate to fib'at docta'neft Title or Type of Document THIS CERTIRCATE MUST BE ATFACHED Number of Pages Date of Document TO THE DOCUMENT DESCRIBED AT RIGHT: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above 7160019 NR'K3NN. NO1N:IY ASSOCI/~.8238Fieenmet/ee..RO. Box 7184 . C~',u,~Pek, CA 91304-1184 deed.csa August 24, 1990 EXHIBIT "A" Legal Description: Those portions of Lot 51 of Tract ~mher 22148 in the unincorporated territory of Riverside County, as recorded June 22, 1989 in Book 202 of Maps, at Pages 92-104, records of said county, state of California, lying within a portion of Section 29, Township 7 Sou~h, Range 2 West, San Bernardino Base and Principal Meridian, more particularly described as follows: EASEMENT AREA nan BEGINNING at the most westerly corner of said Lot 51, in the southeasterly line of La Serena Way 88.00 feet wide, being a tangent curve concave northwesterly with a radius of 1044.00 feet, a radial to said corner bears South 33°23e50" East; thence, along said southeasterly line and said curve through a central angle of 4°16t51" an arc length of 78.00 to a point; thence, continuing along the northerly line of said Lot 51, North 87°57"28" East 30.00 feet to a point in the southwesterly line of Poole Court 60.00 feet wide, being also a curve concave northeasterly with a radius of 350.00 feet, a radial to said point bears South 39 33e53" West; thence, along said southwesterly line and said curvethrougha central angle of 0°58t15" an arc length of 5.93 feet to a point; said southwesterly line, South 38 35~38' thence, departing o West 3.30 feet; thence, South 82~28~58" West 28.20 feet; thence, South 51~54~21" West 76.01 feet to a point in the southwesterly line of said Lot 51; thence, along said southwesterly line, North 38~00~11" West 13.34 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said easement contains 1,095 square feet more or less. 1ot51.eas August 24, 1990 EASEMENT AREA "B" BEGINNING at the most westerly corner of said Lot 51, in the southeasterly line of La Serena Way 88.00 feet wide; thence, North 33°23m49w West 5.00 to a point in a curve concave northwesterly with a radius of 1039.00 feet, a radial to said point bears South 33°23m49" East; thence, along said curve through a central angle of 4°15'00" an arc length of 77.07 feet; thence, North 87°57'28" East 36.69 feet; thence, South 39°33'53a West 5.00 feet to a'point in the northerly line of said Lot 51; thence, along said northerly line, South 87°57'28" West 30.00 feet to a point in :said southeasterly line of La Serena Way, being also a curve concave northwesterly with a radius of 1044.00 feet~ thence, along said southeasterly line and said curve througha central angle of 4°16'51" an arc length 78.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said easement contains 512 square feet more or less. 8-2 - e O ' L.S. 537 12/31~92 1ot51.eas August 24, 1990 EXHIBIT" B" Recorded at request of and return to: DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING SERVICES Real Property Management Division 3133 7th Street Riverside, California 902507 FREE RECORDING This instrument is for the benefit of the County of Riverside and is entitled to be recorded without fee. (Govt. Code 6103) Parcel: Project: ("GRAN~')~ereby grants and conveys to the City'of Temecula Community Service District in behalf of C.S.A. 143 ("GRANTEE"), together with the dght to further grant or transfer the same to others, a revocable easement and right-of-way for maintaining, operating, altering, repairing, and replacing equipment and landscaping over and within the boundaries of that certain real property located in the County of Riverside, State of California, more particularly described in Exhibit 'A" and shown in Exhibit 'B" attached hereto, which is incorporated herein by this reference (the "Easement Area"). If GRANTEE, or its govemmental entity, successors, or assigns, determines it is unable, incapable, or unwilling to maintain said Easement Area, maintenance shall, after notice, become the responsibility of GRANTOR, with all covenants and agreements of this easement extending to and becoming obligations of all heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the GRANTOR. DATED 3/~/~./~,Z~/_/'' STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) SS. SUBSCRIBING-WITNESS ACKNOWLEDGMENT ("WITNESS JUFLAT') State of Ca1 ~ forn~ County of San Dte~o OFFICIAL NOTARY SEAL BARBARA k ROB|NET Nota~/Pulic -- Calornla SAN DIEGO COUNTY SS. Onthisme 3rd dayof December 1990 .beforeme, ffieunder~ Nota, yPub~c, person~appeared John Sla~:r. on (name of su~cdU~ wrmess), [] Proved to rne on the oath/affuTrmtion of John Slact:on (name of credible t~bethe~ers~nwh~senameissubsc~bedt~ew~thininstrumentasawi~ne~sthe~et~.wh~.being Bbyrnedulyswom. deposes and sa that (he/she) was present ancl saw ob L. Thone and HeTen Thone o strument as a party thereto. execute the same, and that said aftant subscribed he (his/her) name to the within instrument as a witness at the request of Bob L, Thone and Helen THIS CERTIRCATE Tffie or Type of Document MUST BE ATI'ACHED Number of Pages Date of Document TO THE DOCUMENT DESCRIBED AT RIGHT: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above 718) 019 NATIONALNO'INRYA~-BE38~Avt,p.O. Bm718e,~i~CA 91304-1184 deed. csa August 24, 1990 EXHIBIT Legal Description: Those portions of Lot 57 of Tract Number 22148 in the unincorporated territory of Riverside County, as recorded June 22, 1989 in Book 202 of Maps, at Pages 92-104, records of said county, state of California, lying within a portion of Section 29, Township 7 South, Range 2 West, San Bernardino Base and Principal Meridian, more particularly described as follows: EASEMENT AREA BEGINNING at the most westerly corner of said Lot 57, in the southeasterly line of La Serena Way 88.00 feet wide, being-a tangent curve concave northwesterly with.a radius of 1044.00 feet, a radial to said comer bears South 29°26'45- East; thence, along said southeasterly line and said curve through a central angle of 4°57'05" an arc length of 72.00 feet to the most northerly corner of said Lot 57; thence, leaving said southeasterly line and continuing along the northeasterly line of said Lot 57, South 38°00tll" East 13.34 feet to a point; thence, leaving said northeasterly line, South 89018'47" West 6.97 feet; thence, South 56°01'22" West 38.80 feet; thence, South 57~42'49" West 29.53 feet to a point in the southwesterly line of said Lot 57; thence, along said southwesterly line, North 27043'40" West 11.88 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said easement contains 777 square feet more or less. 1ot57.eas August 24, 1990 ~E~'fENT ~ 'Be BEGINNING at the most westerly comer of said Lot 57, in the southeasterly line of La Serena Way 88.00 feet wide; thence, North 29°26'45' West 5.00 feet to a point in a curve concave northwesterly with a radius of 1039.00 feet, a radial to said point bears South 29026'45, East; thence, along said curve through a central angle of 3°57~05, an arc length of 71.65 feet; thence, leaving said curve, South 33o23'50, East 5.00 feet to the most northerly corner of said Lot 57, being a point in the southeasterly line of said La Serena Way, being also a curve concave northwesterly with a radius of 1044.00 feet, a radial to said corner bears South 33°23~50" East; thence, along said southeasterly line and.' said curve through a central angle of 3°57'05w an arc length of 72.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said easement contains 359 square feet more or less. lot57.eas August 24, 1990 EXHIBIT" B ' Recorded at request of and return to: DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING SERVICES Real Property Management Division 3133 7th Street Riverside, California 902507 FREE RECORDING This instrument is for the benefit of the County of Riverside and is entitled to be recorded without fee. (Govt. Code 6103) Parcel: Project: ("GRANTOR") here ants and conve~;s to the C cula Community Service District in behalf of C.S.A. 143 ("GRANTEE"), together with the right to further grant or transfer the same to others, a revocable easement and right-of-way for maintaining, operating, altering, repairing, and replacing equipment and landscaping over and within the boundaries of that certain real property located in the County of Riverside, State of California, more particularly described in Exhibit "A" and shown in Exhibit 'B" attached hereto, which is incorporated herein by this reference (the "Easement Area.). If GRANTEE, or its governmental entity, successors, or assigns, determines it is unable, incapable, or unwilling to maintain said EaSement Area, maintenance shall, after notice, become the respons~ility of GRANTOR, with all covenants and agreements of this easement extending to and becoming obligations of all heirs, executors, administrators, · ' DATED STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) .'7'~,z GRANTOR SUBSCRIBING-WITNESS ACKNOWLEDGMENT ("WITNESS JURAT") Site of California Coun~of San Diego }SS. OFFICIAL NOTARY SEAL. BARBARA A. ROBINEl' NOlay PUtiC -- Callkxnia SAN DIEGO COUNTY Cornre. Expires MAY 31,1994 O, tl~s~e 29thdayof November'--: 1990 .Oeforeme.~eunde~ned Notary Pu~c. personally al~eared John Slatton (name of ~___~,v~J witness). IZ pe,so~lyknowntome [~ proved to rne on the oath/aff~matjon of John Slatton (name of Credble witness who identifies subscribing witr--,o,s), acmdible witness whom I know persoraly, t~bethepers~nwh~senameissubsc~ib~dt~~hewithininstrumentasawimessth~~et~~wh~.~-~-``` by me duly swom, def3oses and says that I~= (he/she) was present ancl saw Patrick Leone and Julie LeOn~-mmeof~d~r~notappemingbefore strurnent as a party ~ereto, exec~e fiae same, and fiat s~d aftant subsc~bed he (h~her) nameto~ewffi~nh~strumentasaw~nessatfiarequestoPnt~-t~,~ l.pnTte Rna .ln3tp (name of pdn~pe s~n~ ag~n) ATTENTION NOTARY: Allhou(~ the information re~__,ee_!ed beow is OPTIONAL it could prevent fm,__,d,__,~,nt attac:tmqe~t of this ceffificate to ano~ar doctmmnL THIS CERTIRCATE TiUe or Type of Document MUST BE ATTACHED Number of Pages Date of Document TO THE [X)CUMENT DESCRI8ED AT RIGHT: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above 7160019 N~IONAL NOTARY ASS(X::Rl[3N.8238RSnWnetAve..RO. BOx 7184.Can6ge pmk. CA 91304-7184 Date deed.csa August 24, 1990 EXHIBIT Legal Description: Those portions of Lot 58 of Tract Number 22148 in the unincorporated territory of Riverside County, as recorded June 22, 1989 in Book 202 of Maps, at Pages 92-104, records of said county, state of California, lying within a portion of Section 29, Township 7 South, Range 2 West, San Bornardino Base and Principal Meridian, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the most northerly corner of said Lot 58, in the southeasterly line of La Serena Way 88.00 feet wide~ thence-, South 27°43t40- East 11.88 feet, along thenortheasterly line of said Lot 58~ thence, leaving said northeasterly line, South57°42t49" West 40.08 feet~ thence,-South 58°53~09- West 68.95 feet~ thence, South 64~45~27" West 22.47 feet to a point in the southwesterly line of said Lot 58~ thence, along said southwesterly line, North 70~35~57- West 34.09 feet to the most westerly comer of said Lot 58, being also a point in the southeasterly line of La Serena Way 88.00 feet wide, being also a point on a curve concave northwesterly with a radius of 1044.00 feet~ thence, along said southeasterly line and said curve, through a central angle of 8~29e26- an arc length of 154.71 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said easement contains 2,497 square feet more less. lot58. eas August 24, 1990 EA~~ ~ nBn BEGINNING at the most northerly corner of said Lot 58, in t~ southeasterly line of La Serena Way 8S.00 feet wide; thence, North 29'26t44w West 5.00 feet to a point in a curve concave northwesterly witha radius of 1039.00 feet, a radial to said point bears South 29'26e44w East; thence, along said curve through a central angle of S'29e26n an arc length of 153.97 feet; thence, leaving said curve, South 20'57e18- East 5.00 feet to the most westerly comer of said Lot 58 in 'the southeasterly line of said La Serena Way, being also a curve concave northwesterly witha radius of 1044.00 feet, a radial to said point bears South 20'57'18" East; thence, along said southeasterly line and said curve through a central angle of 8'29e26w an arc length of 154.71 feet: to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said easement contains 772 square feet more or less. L.S. 5937 12/31/92 1ot58.eas August 24, 1990 /3O33' / ~ ~LTON Recorded at request of and return to: Department of Building Services Real Property Management Division 3133 7th Street Riverside, California 902507 FREE RECORDING This instrument is for the benefit of the County of Riverside and is entitled to be recorded without fee. (Govt. Code 6103) FOR A VALUABLR CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, C~a~/~(. ~~TOR~ "G ) herebygrants and conveys to the City of Temecula Community Service District in behalf of C.S.A. 143 ("GRANTEE"), together with the right to further grant or transfer the same to others, a perpetual easement and right-of- way for maintaining, operating, altering, repairing, and replacing equipment and landscaping over and within the boundaries of that certain real property located in the County of Riverside, State of California, more particularly described in Exhibit "A" and shown in Exhibit "B" attached hereto, which is incorporated herein by this reference (the "Easement Area"). If GRANTEE, or its governmental entity, successors, or assigns, determines it is unable, incapable, or unwilling to maintain said Easement Area, maintenance shall, after notice, become the responsibility of GRANTOR, With all covenants and agreements of this easement extending to and becoming obligations of all heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the GRANTOR. GRANTOR / STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) SS. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) on ~e~n~c ~3, I~0 before me, 'the instrument and a edg a u undersigned, a ,known to the within the same. WITNESS my hand official seal. CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE This is to certify that the interest in real property conveyed by the within deed to the City of Temecula Community Service District in behalf of C.S.A. 143, a political corporation and/or governmental agency, is hereby accepted by order of the Board of Directors on the date below and the GRANTEE consents to the recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer. Date deed.c~a August 24, 1990 EXHIBIT Legal Description: Those portions of Lot 59 of Tract Number 22148 in the unincorporated territory of Riverside County, as recorded June 22, 1989 in Book 202 of Maps, at Pages 92-104, records of said county, state of California, lying within a portion of Section 29, Township 7 South, Range 2 West, San Bernardino Base and Principal Meridian, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the most westerly corner of said Lot 59, in the southeasterly line of La Serena Way 88.00 feet wide; thence,- along said southeasterly line, North71°15~.S8- East 34.10 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave northwesterly with a radius of 1044.00 feet~ thence, along said southeasterly line and said curvethrougha central angle of 2°13~17- an arc length to the most northerly corner of said Lot 59, a radial to said corner bears South 20 57~19" East~ thence, leaving said southeasterly line and said curve, continuing along the northeasterly line of said Lot 59, South 70~35t58- West 34.09 feet to a point~ thence, leaving said northeasterly line, South 64°45~27" West 28.99 feet~ thence, South65~10~24- West 56.55 feet to a point in the southwesterly line of said Lot 59~ thence, along said southwesterly line, North 47~41~03- West 33.77 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said easement contains 2,115 square feet more or less. EASEMENT AREA "B" BEGINNING at the most westerly corner of said Lot 59, in the southeasterl. y line of La Serena Way 88.00 feet wide, being also a point in the southwesterly line of said Tract Number 221487 th.ence, along said southwesterly line, North47°41~03- West 5.71 feet~ thence, North 71°15~58- East to the beginning of a tangent curve concave northwesterly with a radius Of 1039.00 feet, a radial to said point bears South 18~44~02- West; thence, along said curve through a central angle of 2°13~17" an arc length of 40.28 feet~ thence, leaving said curve, South 20~57~19" East 5.00 feet to the most northerly corner of said Lot 59, being also a point in said southeasterly line of La Serena Way, said southeasterly line being a curve concave northwesterly with a radius of 1044.00 feet, a radial to said point bears South 20°57~19. East~ thence, along said curve through a central angle of 2°13~17- 1ot59.eas August 24, 1990 an arc length of 40.47 feet~ thence, continuing along the southeasterly line of saidLaSerena Way, tangent to last said curve, South 71°15,58w West 34.10 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said easement contains 379 square feet more or less. /t lot59.eas August 24, 1990 EXHIBIT "B" "ALTON ~'~ ~ ,v~ LOT ~V" Recorded at request of and return to: DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING SERVICES Real Property Management Division 3133 7th Street Riverside, California 902507 FREE RECORDING This instrument is for the benefit of the County of Riverside and is entitled to be recorded without fee. (Govt. Code 6103) Project: District in behalf of C.S.A. 143 ('GRANTEE), together with the right to further grant or transfer the same to others, a revocable easement and right-of-way for maintaining, operating, altering, repairing, and replacing equipment and landscaping over and within the boundaries of that certain real property located in the County of Riverside, State of California, more particularly described in Exhibit 'A' and shown in Exhibit 'B' attached herato, which is incorporated herein by this reference (the 'Easement Area'). If GRANTEE, or its governmental entity, successors, or signs, determines it is unable, incapable, or unwilling to mantan said Easement Area, maintenance shall, after notice, become the responsibility of GRANTOR, with all covenants and agreements of this easement extending to and becoming obligations of all heirs, executors, administrators, successors and T~,of the GRANTOR. Witness by: ~ X/~~ GRANTOR STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) SS. SUBSCRIBING-WITNESS ACKNOWLEDGMENT ("WITNESS JURAT") Site of CalifoTnia CounW of San Diego } SS. OFFICIAL NOTARY SEAL BARBARA A. ROBINET Nolay Public -- California SAN DIEGO COUNTY Comm. Expires MAY 31,199,1 O. mis me 29th day of November 1990 . before me. the undersigned No~WPu~c, maC~eared John SlatCon (nameofsubec~b~w~ness). [] proved to me on the oath/affimmtion of John Slatl:on (narneoforedible witness who identifies subscribing witness). a cxedible witness whom I know persona~. t~bethepers~nwh~senameis~ubsc~bedt~thew~thininstrumentas~witnesstheret~~wh~~beng me uh/ , and says that he (he/she) was present and saw (name of pdndpaa mgr~er not appearing before Notary), the same person described in and whose name is subscribed to the within and annexed in- strument as a party thereto, execute the same, and that said aftant subscribed. he (his/her) name o the within instrument as a witness at the request of }faLchael Sean Brownin.8; ) THIS CERTIRCATE 'RUe or Type of Document MUST BE ATTACHED Number of Pages Date of Document TO THE DOCUMENT DESCRIBED AT RIGHT: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above · 7160019 N/ZlONN.~~*8236Ftenmet/ee.*RO. Box ?184-Ca,-,c.,~Pek. CA 91304-7184 deed. csa August 24, 1990 EXHIBIT Legal Description: Those portions of Lot 79 of Tract Number 22148 in the unincorporated territory of Riverside County, as recorded June 22, 1989 in Book 202 of Maps, at Pages 92-104, records of said county, state of California, lying within a portion of Section 29, Township 7 South, Range 2 West, San Bernardino Base and Principal Meridian, more particularly described as follows: EASEMENT AREA BEGINNING at the northwest comer of said Lot 79, in the southeasterly line of La Serena Way 88.00 feet wide; thence,. South 89°31'25" East 16.14 feet, along the northerly line of said Lot 79; thence, leaving said northerly line, South 43°51'50" West 103.49 feet; thence, South 3°03'31" East 25.81 feet; thence, South34°29'41- West 5.87 feet to the northerly line of Pools Court 60.00 feet wide; thence, along said northerly line, being a tangent curve concave northerly with a radius of 290.00 feet, through a central angle of 0°57'30" an arc length of 4.85 feet to a point, a radial to said point bears South35°27'11- West; thence, North2e09'22" West 37.02 feet along the southwesterly line of said Lot 79 to a point of cusp with the southeasterly line of said La Serena Way; thence, along said southeasterly line, being a curve concave northwesterly witha radius of 1044.00 feet, through a central angle of 4e59t19" an arc length of 90.90 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said easement contains 1,313 square feet more or less. EASEMENT AREA "B" BEGINNING at the northwest comer of said Lot 79, in the southeasterly line of La Serena Way S8.00 feet wide, being also a point in the northerly line of said Tract~,mher 22148; thence, along said northerly line, North 89e31'25" West 6.62 feet to a point in a curve concave northwesterly witha radius of 1039.00 feet, a radial to said point bears South 48e27'39" East; thence, along said curve through a central angle of 4e43t49" an arc length of 85.78 feet; thence, leaving said curve, South 2°09'22" East 44.95 feet; thence, North 35e27'11" East 5.00 feet to a point in the northeasterly line of Poole Court 60.00 feet wide; thence, continuing along the southwesterly line of said Lot 79, North 2°09'22" West 37.02 1ot79.eas August 24, 1990 feet to a point in said southeasterly line of La Serena Way, being a curve concave northwesterly with a radius of 1044.00 feet, a radial to said point bears South43o42 t 40" East ~ thence, along said curve through a central angle of 4°59 ' 19" an arc length of 90.90 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said easement contains 567 square feet more or less. 1ot79.eas Auqust 24, 1990 EXHIBIT" B" RecOrded at request of and return to: City Clerks Department City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 FREE RECORDING This instrument is for the benefit of the City of Temecula and is entitled to be recorded without fee (GovL Cede 6103}. IRREVOCABLE OFFER TO DEDICATE Parcel: APN # 9143100097 Project: Tract 22148 FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, George Wimpey Inc. dba Morrison Homes ("Grantor"), hereby irrevocably offers to dedicate to the City of Temecula ("Grantee"), together with the right to further grant or transfer the same to others, a perpetual easement and right-of way for maintaining, operations, altering, repairing, and replacing equipment and landscaping over and within the boundaries of that certain real property located in the City of Temecula, County of riverside, more particularly described in Exhibit 'W' attached hereto, which is incorporated herein by this reference (the "Easement Area"). administrators, successors an .~.i//o e~/~..,~R. GRAN~T k U FJ DATED If GRANTEE, or its governmental entity, successors, or assigns, determines it is unable, incapable, or unwilling to maintain said Easement Area, maintenance shall, after notice, become the responsibility of GRANTOR, with: all covenants and agreements of this easement extending to and becoming obligations of all heirs, executors, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE On .~11'-I Icl5j~ before me, the undersigned. A NotaW Public in and for the State of California, personally appeared 'f' ~) P. , personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of -_,-_ticfactory ovklonoo) to be the ~J-~.T./::tr F, ur~ · person(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacitydes), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon beliaif of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature E,~ P,~C-,L-~ CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE I' ' ': DIANNE'~ I This is to cerlffy that the interest in real property conveyed by the within Irrevocable Offer To Dedicate to the City of Temecula, a political corporation and/or governmental agency, is hereby accepted by order of the City Council the date below and the Grantee consents to the recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer. Date · ' June S. Greek, City Clerk ""' EXHIBIT "A" PARCEL"A" PORTION OF LOT 80 OF TRAC'F NUMBER 22148 IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, AS RECORDED JUNE 22, 1989 IN BOOK 202 OF MAPS, AT PAGES 92-104, RECORDS OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, LYING WITHIN A PORTION OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 2 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE MOST ~Y CORNER OF SAID LOT 80 ALSO BEING A POINT ON THE SO~STERLY LINE OF LOT "G" OF SAID TRACT NUMBER 22148; THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTHEASTERLY LINE SOUTH 47°41'59* EAST A DISTANCE OF 17.09 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 9°14'43* WEST A DISTANCE OF 7.02 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 31 °55 '55" EAST A DISTANCE OF 51.12 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 24°37'21* EAST A DISTANCE OF 75.65 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 60°42'52" EAST A DISTANCE OF 34.65 FRRT TO A POINT ON THE NORTttWF~TERLY LINE OF LOT "F" OF SAID TRACT NUMBER 22148, BEING A CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY WITH A RADIUS OF 956.00 FEET, A RADIAL TO SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 24°18'01* WEST; THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 00°13'50* AN ARC I-RNGTH OF 3.85 l~.k-rr TO THE MOST SOUTI-~-RLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 80; THF-NCE LEAVING SAID CURVE AND ALONG THE SOUTI-~-RLY LINE OF SAID LOT 80, NORTH 68"27'54* WEST 34.24 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF LOT *E* OF SAm TRACT NUMBER 22148; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE, NORTH 20034'02* WEST A DISTANCE OF 20.42' FEET TO A POINT, SAID POINT BRING THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY WITH A RADIUS OF 333.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 69°25'58" EAST; TI-IF~NCE, ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 19°59'55" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 116.23 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID CURVE AND ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT · 80, NORTH 03°16'38" EAST A DISTANCE OF 17.89 l~-~:~r TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID PARCEL CONTAINS 1,183.1 SQUARE FE~., 0.027 ACRES MORE OR LESS. SUBJECt TO ALL COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESERVATIONS, REST~CTIONS, RIGHTS, RIGHTS OF WAY AND EASEMENTS, IF ANY, OF RECO_.RD. SEE EXI-HRIT "B" A'rrACH~-n HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF. File No. wp51~MORBO-86.1gl PARCEL "B" ~ THOSE PORTIONS OF LOT "E*, LOT "F", AND LOT *G" OF TRACT NUMBER 22148, IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, AS RECORDED JUNE 22, 1989 IN BOOK 202 OF MAPS, AT PAGES 92-104, RECORDS OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, LYING WITHIN A PORTION OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 2 WEST, SAN BERNARD1NO BASE AND PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE MOST WESTERLY CORNER OF LOT 80 OF SAID TRACT NUMBER 22148 ALSO BEING A POINT ON THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT "G"; THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF LOT 80 OF SAD TRACT NUMBER 22148, SOUTH 03°16'38" WEST A DISTANCE OF 17.89 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAD LOT "E", SAID POINT BEING ON A CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY WITH RADIUS OF 333.00 FEET, A RADIAL TO SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 49°26'03" EAST; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 19°59'55" AN ARC LENGTH OF 116.23 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT "E*, SOUTH 20034'02" EAST A DISTANCE OF 20.42 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 68°27'54" EAST A DISTANCE OF 34.24 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT "F" BEING A CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWES~Y WITH A RADIUS OF 956.00 FEET, A RADIAL TO SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 24°04'11" WEST; THENCE NORTH EASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 28°08'12* AN ARC DISTANCE OF 469.47 FEET; THENCE TANGENT TO SAID CURVE NORTH 37°47'37" EAST A DISTANCE OF 18.17 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY WITH RADIUS OF 1644.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 05°08'42" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 147.63 FEET TO THE MOST EASTERLY CORNER OF LOT 86 OF SAID TRACT NUMBER 22148, THE RADIAL LINE TO SAID CORNER BEARS NORTH 47°03'41" WEST; THENCE LEAVING SAID CURVE AND SAID NORTHWF. STERLY LINE OF SAID LOT "F", SOUTH 47°03'41" EAST A DISTANCE OF 5.00 FPl:~I' TO A POINT ON A CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY WITH A RADIUS OF 1639.00 FF~EI'; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 5°08'42" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 147.18 F~-k'T; THI~NCE TANGENT TO SAID CURVE SOUTH 37047'37" WEST A DISTANCE OF 18.17 F!~-P"r TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE NORTHWESTERLY WITH RADIUS OF 961'.00 FF.k":I'; TI-IF~NCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH 'A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 28°08, 12" AN ARC DISTANCE.OF 471.93 l~-~'f TO POINT WITH RADIAL BEARING OF SOUTH 24°04'11" EAST; THENCE LEAVING SAID CURVE NORTH 68027'54" WEST A DISTANCE OF 41.39 FEET; THENCE NORTH 20034'02" WEST A DISTANCE OF 20.62 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY WITH RADIUS OF 328.00 FF-~T, THE RADIAL LINE TO SAD BEGINNING OF CURVE BEARS NORTH 69025'58" EAST; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF File No. wpS1~MOMO-8e.lOI 20°04'07" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 114.89 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID CURVE, NORTH 03° 16'38" EAST A DISTANCE OF 24.21 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 47°41 '03" EAST A DISTANCE OF 5.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID PARCEL CONTAINS 4,075.~-SQUARE FEET, 0.094 ACRES MORE OR LESS. SUBJECT TO ALL COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONS, RIGfiTS, RIGHTS OF WAY AND EASEMENTS, IF ANY, OF RECORD. SEE EXHIBIT "B" ATFACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A-PART F'de No. wpSI VdOReO-Be.lgl CURVE LENGTH DELTA RADIUS 3.85' 0'13'50' 956.00' ,,,' \ \ , I...U. N37*47'37*E 18,17° U5 $47'41'03'E: 5.00' % = . (' ',, , ..,~.:*-,I ,A ..... 0 ~ Lot 96 · f .......... .~.............!..~ ,. , r ':: _~ ~ ' LAND$C~°E Portions of Lot 80. Lot "~', Lot "F' - mt ,..m== · um,x., and Lot 'G' of Tract 22148 recordea*-*' F,/'Ollt~//g June 22, 1989 am shown by map filed ~,~,~.~ ~ nook 202, r.i.: ms)4ao-no~ rmcord8 of the County Recorder. Riverside County. State of Cel~omla Recorded at request of and return to: City Clerks Department City of Ternecula 43174 Business Park Drive /..T. emecula, CA 92590 tEE RECORDING This instrument is for the benefit of the City of Temecula and is entitled to be recorded without fee (Govt. Code 6103). IRREVOCABLE OFFER TO DEDICATE Parcel: APN it 9143100097 Project Tract 22148 FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby ackn~ledged, George Wimpey Inc. dba Morrison Homes ("Grantor"), hereby irrevocably offers to dedicate to the City of Temecula ("Grantee"), together with the right to further grant or transfer the same to others, a perpetual easement and right-of way for maintaining, operations, altering, repairing, and repladng equipment and landscaping over and within the boundaries of that certain real property located in the City of Temecula, County of riverside, more .particularly described in Exhibit 'W' attached hereto, which is incorporated herain by .this reference (the "Easement Area"). If GRANTEE, or its governmental entity, successors, or assigns, determines it is unable, incapable, or unwilling to maintain said Easement Area, maintenance shall, after notice, become the responsibility of GRANTOR, with all covenants and agreements of this easement ,xtending to and becoming obligations of all heirs, executors, assigns f . NTOR. administrators, successors and ~ //:/./~- . DATED STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE on 5lt )?k befo{~ the undersigned, A 'Notary Public in and for be State of California, personab/appeared !d. ~ ). ~ l' u .I , : , personally known to me (or proved to me on the b~i= of istiff'/ctory evklenee) to be Ihe person(s) is/are suJISed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/the authorized capadty(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upq. n behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrumenL WITNESS my hand and offi~~.~/L4~ Signature ~ CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE This is to certify that the interest in real property conveyed by the within Irrevocable Offer To Dedicate to the City of Temecula, a political corporation and/or governmentel agency, is hereby accepted by order of the City Council the date below and the Grantee /'-~ents to the recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer. June S. Greek. City Clerk EXHIBIT 'A~ ~ Legal Description: That portion of Lot 81 of Tract Number 22148 in the unincorporated territory of Riverside County, as recorded June 22, 1989 in Book 202 of Maps, at Pages 92-104, records of said county, state of California, lying within a portion of Section 29, Township 7 South, Range 2 West, San Bernardino Base and Principal Meridian, more particularly described as follows: EASEMENT AREA "A" BEGINNING at the most southerly corner of said Lot 81, being a point in the northwesterly line of La Serena Way 88.00 feet wide, being also a point on a curve concave northwesterly with a radius of 956.00 feet, a radial to said point bears South 30010t02" East~ thence, along said curve through a central angle of 3°44s06n an arc length of 62.32 feet to the most easterly corner of said Lot 81~ thence, leaving said curve, South 0 33 54t09s East 5.00 feet to a point on a curve concave northwesterly with a radius of 961.00 feet, a radial to said point bears South 33°54t09" East~ thence, along said curve through a central angle of 3°44"06" an arc length of 62.65 feet~ thence, leaving said curve, North 30°10~02- West 5.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said easement contains 312 square feet more or less. ' L.S. 5937 12/31/92 1ot81.eas August 24, 1990 EXHIBIT "B" °~ Recorded at request of and return to: City Clerks Department City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 FREE RECORDING This instrument is for the benefit of the City of Temecula and is entitled to be recorded without fee (Govt. Code 6103). IRREVOCABLE OFFER TO DEDICATE Parcel: APN # 9143100097 Project: Tract 22148 FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, George Wimpey Inc. dba Morrison Homes ("Grantor"), hereby irrevocably offers to dedicate to the City of Temecula ("Grantee"), together with the right to further grant or transfer the same to others, a perpetual easement and right-of way for maintaining, operations, altering. repairing, and replacing equipment and landscaping over and within the boundaries of that certain real property located in the City of Temecula, County of riverside, more particularly described in Exhibit 'W' attached hereto, which is incorporated herein by this reference (the "Easement Area"). If GRANTEE, or its governmental entity, successors, or assigns, determines it is unable, incapable, or unwilling to maintain said Easement Area, maintenance shall, after notice, become the responsibility of GRANTOR, with' all covenants and agreements of this easemen extending to and becoming obligations of all heirs, executors, DATED STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE n.~.l , ~monel~ kno~ to me (or prorod to mo on ~o be~ of ae~fe~ e~en~e) ~ ~ ~e pemon(s) ' ~re eu~c~d ~ ~e ~in in~ment ~nd ~eknowl~g~ ~ me ~e~ he!~e~ey exec~ ~e ~me ~ h~er~e~ eutho~ed cepe~Oes), end ~et by hi~er~eir ~neture(s) on ~e ins~ument ~e pe~on(s), or ~e en~ upon ~heff of ~ch ~e pemon(s) ~, exec~ ~e in~menL WITNESS hand an.d offi ' ea~:~~ Signature ~pt~ ~. CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE -This is to certify that the interest in real property conveyed by the within Irrevocable Offer To Dedicate to the City of Temecula, a poliljcai corporation and/or govemmental agency, is hereby accepted by order of the City Council the date below and the Grantee consents to the recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer. Date June S. Greek, City Clerk EXHIBIT Legal Description: That portion of Lot 82 of Tract Number 22148 in the unincorporated territory of Riverside County, as recorded June 22, 1989 in Book 202 'of Maps, at Pages 92-104, records of said county, state of California, lying within a portion of Section 29, Township 7 South, Range 2 West, San Bernardino Base and Principal Meridian, more particularly described as follows: EASEMENT AREA "A" BEGINNING at the most southerly corner of said Lot 82, being a point in the northwesterly line of La Serena Way 88.00 feet wide, being also a point on a curve concave northwesterly with a radius of 956.00 feet, a radial to said point bears South 33°54'09 East; thence, along said curve through a central angle of 3°41'25" an arc length of 61.57 feet to the most easterly corner of said Lot 82; thence, leaving said curve, South 37°35'33" East 5.00 feet to a point on a curve concave northwesterly with a radius of 961.00 feet, a radial to said point bears South 37°35t33" East; thence, along said curve through a central angle of 3e41'25" an arc length of 61.90 feet; thence, leaving said curve, North 33°54'09- West 5.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said easement contains 312 square feet more or less. L.S. 5937 lot82.eas August 24, 1990 EXHIBIT" B ' Recorded at request of and return to: City Clerks Department City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive ~T._e_mecula, CA 92590 .,-'E RECORDING This instrument is for the benefit of the City of Temecula and is entitled to be recorded without fee (Govt. Cede 6103). IRREVOCABLE OFFER TO DEDICATE Parcel: APN # 9143100097 Project: Tract 22148 FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, George Wimpey Inc. dba Morrison Homes ("Grantor"), hereby irrevocably offers to dedicate to the City of Temecula ("Grantee"), together with the right to further grant or transfer the same to others, a perpetual easement and right-of way for maintaining, operations, altering, repairing, and replacing equipment and landscaping over and within the boundaries of that certain real property located in the City of Temecula, County of riverside, more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto, which is incorporated herein by this reference (the "Easement Area"). If GRANTEE, or its governmental entity, successors, or assigns, determines it is unable, incapable, or unwilling to maintain said Easement Area, maintenance shall, after notice, become the responsibility of GRANTOR, with' all covenants and agreements of this easement extending to and becoming obligations of all heirs, executors, administrators, successors and o,~/~."~:R. assigns ur U.F'. GRANTOR DATED STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE onI ) u~ore L~.e,i:~.e undersigned, A Notap/Public in and for the State of California, personally appeared I~ ·, ~ ' I K, personally known to me (or preved te me en the baEk ef s~tisfactory evidence) to be the person(~) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the enlity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrumenL CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE This is to cerlffy that the interest in real property conveyed by the within Irrevocable Offer To Dedicate to the City of Temecula, a political corporation and/or governmental agency, is hereby accepted by order of the City Council the date below and the Grantee P'---ento to the recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer. June S. Greek, City Clerk EXHIBIT "A" Legal Description: That portion of Lot 85 of Tract ~mher 22148 in the unincorporated territory of Riverside County, as recorded June 22, 1989 in Book 202 of Maps, at 'Pages 92-104, records of said county, state of california, lying within a portion of Section 29, Town. ship 7 South, Range 2 West, San Bernardino Base and Principal Meridian, more particularly described as follows: EASEMENT AREA BEGINNING at the most southerly corner of said Lot 85, being a point in the northwesterly line of Le Serena Way 88.00 feet wide, being also a point on a curve concave northwesterly with a radius of 956.00 feet, a radial to said point bears South 37°35~33" East~ thence, along said curve through a central angle of 12°17~56" an arc length of 205.21 feet to the most easterly corner of said Lot 85~ thence, leaving said curve, South 49~53~29" East 5.00 feet to a point on a curve concave northwesterly with a radius of 961.00 feet, a radial to said point bears South 49°53e29- East~ thence, along said curve through a central angle of 12°17~56" an arc length of 206.28 feet~ thence, leaving said curve, North 37~35~33- West 5.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said easement contains 1,029 square feet more or less. lot85.eas August 24, 1990 EXHIBIT" B" ENCt4I!IS - FtaANNIIS - ~S ~151 .Mt'EhlOA ENCINA5. SUITE A. CAI~. CALIIIC2 RecOrded at request of and return to: City Clerks Department City of Ternecula 43174 Business Park Drive Ternecula, CA 92590 FREE RECORDING This instrument is for the benefit of the City of Ternecula and is entitled to be recorded without fee (Govt. Code 6103). IRREVOCABLE OFFER TO DEDICATE Parcel: APN # 9143100097 Project: Tract 22148 LOT ~ FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, George Wimpey Inc. dba Morrison Homes ("Grantor"), hereby irrevocably offers to dedicate to the City of Temecula ("Grantee"), together with the right to further grant or transfer the same to others, a perpetual easement and right-of way for maintaining, operations, altering, repairing, and replacing equipment and landscaping over and within the boundaries of that certain real property located in the City of Temecula, County of riverside, more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto, which is incorporated herein by this reference (the "Easement Area"), If GRANTEE, or its governmental entity, successors, or assigns, determines it is unable, incapable, or unwilling to maintain said Easement Area, maintenance shall, after notice, become the responsibility of GRANTOR, With' all covenants and agreements of this easement extending to and becoming obligations of all heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of th TOR. DATED STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ~ 4~ {~ ~ undersigned, A Notary Public in and for the State of Califomia personally appeared authorized capacitydes), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instmrnent the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrurnenL CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE This is to certify that the interest in real property conveyed by the within Irrevocable Offer To Dedicate to the City of Temecula, · political corporation and/or governmental agency, is hereby accepted by order of the City Council the date below and the Grantee consents to the recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer. ~"'- Date June S. Greek, City Clerk EXHIBIT Legal Description: That portion of Lot 86 of Tract Number 22148 in the unincorporated territory of Riverside County, as recorded June 22, 1989 in Book 202 of Maps, at Pages 92-104, records of said county, state of California, lying within a portion of Section 29, Township 7 South, Range 2 West, San Bernardino Base and Principal Meridian, more particularly described as follows: ~EMEZ'.i"E ~ ~AN BEGINNING at the most southerly corner of said Lot 86, being a point in the northwesterly line of La Serena Way 88.00 feet wide, being also a point on a curve concave northwesterly with a radius of 956.00 feet, a radial to said point bears South 49°53t29u East; thence, along said curve through a central angle of 2°18s54u an arc length of 38.63 feet to the end of said curve; thence, tangent to said curve, North 37'47t37- East 18.17 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave southeasterly with a radius of 1644.00 feet, a radial to said point bears North 52'12823" West; thence, along said curve through a central angle of 5*08~42" an arc length of 147,63 feet to the most easterly corner of said Lot 86; thence, leaving said curve and said northwesterly line of La Serena Way, South 47'03841" East 5.00 feet to a point on a curve concave southeasterly with a radius of 1639.00,00 feet, a radial to said point bears North 47'03841w West; thence, along said curve through a central angle of 5*08842" an arc length of 147.18 feet to the end of curve; thence, tangent to said curve, South 37'47837" West 18.17 feet to a point, said point being the beginning of a tangent curve concave northwesterly with a radius of 961.00 feet, a radial to said point bears South49*53t29u East; thence, leaving said curve, North 49'53~29" West 5.-00 Zeet to the POINT OF 'BEGINNING. Said easement contains 1,021 square feet more or less. · S. 5937 L12/31/92 1ot86.eas August.24, 1990 EXHIBIT" B" (2:3,z ~. 19 Per .,e,W. 7~/ZZ-Z:~. ,-,,,,% .~00.26' "' 69. //0 ~ /'I.,? ~. 413&j/~' 38- 20' Recorded at request of and return to: City Clerks Department City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 · :E RECORDING This instrument is for the benefit of the City of Temecula and is entitled to be recorded without fee (GovL Code 6103). Parcel: APN # 9143100097 Project Tract22148 LOT 110 - IRREVOCABLE OFFER TO DEDICATE FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION. receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, George Wimpey Inc. dba Morrison Homes ("Grantor''), hereby irrevocably offers to dedicate to the City of Temecula ("Grantee"), together with the right to further grant or transfer the same to others, a perpetual easement and right-of way for maintaining, operations, altering, repairing, and replacing equipment and landscaping over and within the boundaries of that certain real property located in the City of Temecula, County of riverside, more particularly described in Exhibit 'W' attached hereto, which is incorporated herein by this reference (the "Easement Area"). If GRANTEE, or its governmental entity, successors, or assigns, determines it is unable, incapable, or unwilling to maintain said Easement Area, maintenance shall, after notice, become the responsibility of GRANTOR, with all covenants and agreements of this easement extending to and becoming obligations of all heirs, executors, and assigns of t e OR. administrators, successors ~~/~/~U ~' ? 3 J l q 6RANToR DATED STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE su~cdbe~ to ~e ~in in~ment and ackno~g~ W me ~at he~h~ey exec~ ~ gme h hler~ author~ed capac~Oes), and ~at by hi~er~eir signa~re(s) on ~e inmment ~e ~mon(s), or ~e en~ u~p ~half of ~ ~e pemon(s) a~ed, exec~ed ~e ins~menL WITNESS m hand an.d offic' se_.~C~,~ Signature ~ CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE This is to certify that the interest in real property conveyed by the within Irrevocable Offer To Dedicate to the City of Temecula, a political corporation and/or governmental agency, is hereby accepted by order of the City Council the date below and the Grantee -'-'~ents to the recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer. June S. Greek, City Clerk PARCEL ~A~ PORTION OF LOT 110 OF TRACT NUMBER 22148 IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, AS RECORDED JUNE 22, 1989 IN BOOK 202 OF MAPS, AT PAGES 92-104, RECORDS OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, LYING WITHIN A PORTION OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 2 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 110, SAID CORNER ALSO BEING A POINT IN A CURVE CONCAVE SOTJTHEASTERLY WITH A RADIUS OF 1644.00 FEET, A RADIAL TO SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 47°03'41" WEST;.' THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAD LOT 110, NORTH 77°27'51" WEST A DISTANCE OF 1.90 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID SOIYrHWESTERLY LINE, NORTH 37°33'29, EAST A DISTANCE OF 26.45 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A OJRVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY WITH A RADIUS OF 1648.31 Fl~rr, A RADIAL LINE BEARS TO SAID POINT NORTH 46° 10'46' WEST; THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 2°04'00' AN ARC LENGTH OF 59.45 FEET TO A POINT IN THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT 22148; THENCE LEAVING SAID CURVE, ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE, SOUTH 89°31'16" EAST A DISTANCE OF 6.15 FEET TO THE MOST EASTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 110, SAID CORNER ALSO BEING A POINT IN THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF LOT 'F" OF SAID TRACT 22148, SAID POINT ALSO BEING IN A NONTANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY WITH A RADIUS OF 1644.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 43°57'37" WEST; TI~-NCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAm CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 3°06'04" (3°06'03" PER SAID TRACT NUMBER 22148) AN ARC LENGTH OF 88.98 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAD PARCEL CONTAINS 342.0 SQUARE FEET, 0,008 ACRES MORE OR LESS. SUBJECT TO AT L COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONS, RIGHTS, RIGHTS OF WAY AND EASEMENTS, IF ANY, OF RECORD. SEE EXHIBIT "B" ATI'ACI-IF-D I-IF~RETO AND BY THIS RI::-FERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF. PARCEL"B" PORTION OF LOT "F" OF TRACT NUMBER 22148 IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, AS RECORDED JUNE 22, 1989 IN BOOK 202 OF MAPS, AT PAGES 92-104, RECORDS OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAD COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, LYING W1THIN A PORTION OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 2 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF LOT 110 OF SAID TRACT NUMBER 22148, SAID CORNER ALSO BEING A POINT ON THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 'F', SAID POINT ALSO BEING IN A CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY WITH A RADIUS OF 1644.00 FF-ET, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 47°03'41* WEST; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 3°06'04" (3°06'03" PER SAID TRACT NUMBER 22148) AN ARC DISTANCE OF 88.98 FEET TO THE MOST EASTERLY CORNER OF LOT 110 OF SAID TRACT NUMBER 22148, SAID CORNER ALSO BEING A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT NUMBER 22148; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE, SOUTH 89°31'16" EAST A DISTANCE OF 7.15 FEET TO A POINT IN A NONTANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY WITH A RADIUS OF 1639.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 43°46'54" WEST; THENCE SOUTHWES~Y ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 3°16'47" AN ARC LENGTH OF 93.82 F~-~:T; THENCE LEAVING SAID-' CURVE NORTH 47°03'41" WEST A DISTANCE OF 5.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID PARCEL CONTAINS 457 SQUARE FEET, 0.011 ACRES MORE OR LESS. SUBJECT TO ALL COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RES~VATIONS, RESTRICTIONS, RIGHTS, RIGHTS OF WAY AND EASF_,MI~-NTS, IF ANY, OF RECORD. SEE EXI-HBIT "B" ATrACI-II:-D I.-IF-RETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HF~REOF. Date RCE 23080 Exp. 12/31/97 i i zzo i I .~ i - i Lot 109 I I I '1 ' -- 4,, _ ~-~7'~, I I "---,. 'it' I I Scole: 1' -50' I r'- // O~ / L . II I ~,~ /////i / {:) I // ./~/ _~'~/// / UNE DIRECTION DISTANCE / 1,2 N3733'29'" E R 80 12/31/97 Expires LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE EASEIv.,, Portions of Lot 110 and Lot 'F' of Tract 22148 reearded June 22, 1989 as ehewn by map filed in Beak 202, Pages 92-104 of Maps. meanis of the County Recorder, Riverside County. State of Carifomia. Recorded at request of and return to: City Clerks Department City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 EE RECORDING 'this instrument is for the benefit of the City of Temecula and is entitled to be recorded without fee (Govt. Cede 6103). IRREVOCABLE OFFER TO DEDICATE Parcel: APN it 9143100097 Project: Tract 22148 FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, George Wimpey Inc. dba Morrison Homes ("Grantor"), hereby irrevocably offers to dedicate to the City of Temecula ("Grantee"), together with the right to further grant or transfer the same to others, a perpetual easement and right-of way for maintaining, operations, altering, repairing, and replacing equipment and landscaping over and within the boundaries of that certain real property located in the City of Temecula, County of riverside, more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto, which is incorporated herain by this reference (the "Easement Area"). If GRANTEE or its governmental entity, successors, or assigns, determines it is unable, incapable, or unwilling to maintain said Easement Area, maintenance shall, after notice, become the responsibility of GRANTOR, with.. all c?v.enants and agreements of this. easement extend' ng and becoming obligations of all heirs, executors, administrators, successors and asmgns of ~~~~, ,~.~. .. DATED STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE , personally known to me (or proved to me on be basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the ri instrument and acknowledged to me that he/sheA~iey executed the same in his~erAheir () authorized capacityOes), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrumenL ::E e CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE This is to cerUfy that the interest in real property conveyed by the within Irrevocable Offer To Dedicate to the City of Temecula, a political corporation and/or governmental agency, is hereby accepted by order of the City Council the date below and the Grantee cAasents to the recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer. June S. Greek, City Clerk LOT 96 PORTION OF LOT 96 OF TRACT NUMBER 22148 IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, AS RECORDED JUNE 22, 1989 IN BOOK 202 OF MAPS, AT PAGES 92-104, RECORDS OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, LYING WITHIN A PORTION OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP ? SOUTH, RANGE 2 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHW~TERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 96, SAID CORNER ALSO BEING TIIE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF LOT 97 AND BEING A POINT ON THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF LOT 'E' OF SAID TRACT NUMBER 22148; THENCE: ALONG THE COMMON LOT LINE OF SAID LOT 96 AND LOT 97, NORTH 42° 18'57" EAST A DISTANCE OF 18.35 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID COMMON LOT LINE OF SAID LOT 96 AND SAID LOT 97, SOUTH 83°36'19' EAST A DISTANCE OF 2.50 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 53° 10'02" EAST A DISTANCE OF 50.35 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 31056'37" EAST A DISTANCE OF 44.70 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 84°03'21" EAST A DISTANCE OF 26.73 FEET; THI:-NCE SOUTH 47°41'03" EAST A DISTANCE OF 3.22 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF LOT "G" OF SAID TRACT NUMBER 22148; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY LINE SOUTH 42018'57" WEST A DISTANCE OF 14.35 FI~.I~TI'; 'rHI:-NCE SOUTH 85° 11'41" WEST A DISTANCE OF 19.10 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF LOT "E" OF SAID TRACT NUMBER 22148; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE NORTH 4'7°41 '03" WEST A DISTANCE OF 106.91 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID PARCEL CONTAINS 2390.5 SQUARE FEET, 0.055 ACRES MORE OR LESS. SUBJECT TO ALL COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONS, RIGHTS, RIGHTS OF WAY AND EASEMENTS, IF ANY, OF RECORD. 23080 March 31, 1995 File No. wp51\mor96.1gl Scab: 1' ,- 50' Lot 97 \\ / ~ ~ \ ~/' '\ /~ Lot 95 \ // \\ \\\ /' B x ot 9e'-, ,· '~ e~ ~ / /'~, o s ~ '~"z ~- ~ / o ~ ~ Lot 80 "~', 82 . .- . ~.. : >./' · '~ . L4 ~ ~ed L5 ~; ~ed . ' L6 ~ ~ed L7 NB~36'Zg*V ~0' . L8 ~rO2*E ~5~ · L9 ~*~37'V 44,70' U5 $47'4~'~ ~r ~ " ~ ~*~'4~ ~93' ' U7 N 4'39'~ E7.~' ~O S47'4~'03'~ 7.33' . P~ d ~ 96, ~ ~ Ju~ :, 1989 ~ eh~ ~ map ~ in ~ 20~ ~ge 92-1~ ~ ef ~e ~un~ R~er, s ~/e/ee ~un~, S~ ~ ~lffom~. .~corde;d at request of and return to: .'ity Clerks Department City of Ternecula 43174 Business Perk Ddve Ternecula, CA 92590 FREE RECORDING This instrument is for the benefit of the City of Temecula and is entitled to be recorded without fee {Govt. Code 6103). IRREVOCABLE OFFER TO DEDICATE Parcel: Lot: 97 Project: Tr act 22148 FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDEBATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Lucas & Mercier Development, In~. ("Grantor"), hereby irrevocably offers to dedicate to the City of Temecula ("Grantee"),'together with the' right to further grant or transfer the same to others, a perpetual easement and right-of-way for maintaining, operating, altering, repairing, and replacing equipment and landscaping over and within the boundaries of that certain real property located in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto, which is incorporated herein by this reference.-{the "Easement Area"). If GRANTEE, or its governmental entity, successors, or assigns, determines it is unable, incapable, or unwilling to maintain said Easement Area, maintenance shall, after notice, become the responsibility of GRANTOR, with all' covenants and agreements of this easement extending to and bel;;oming obligations of all heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the GRANTOR. GRANTOR March 28, 1995 DATED STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE On before me, the undersigned, A Notary Public in and for the State of California, personally' .appeared . personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized .capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE This is to certify that the interest in real property conveyed by the within Irrevocable Offer To Dedicate to the City of Temecula, a political corporation and/or governmental agency, is hereby accepted by order of the City Council the date below and the Grantee consents to the recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer. Date June S. Greek, City Clerk 3~'feemm'iff. vA~ed 013182 CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of California County of Orange On 3-28-95 before me, Terri L. Roman , Dam NameBndTilteotOIcmr(e.g.,'JaneDoe, NotatyPtmlc') personally appeared Rick E. Metclef , Name(s) d S~gne~s) ~ personally known to me - OR - [] proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. OPTIONAL Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent ram/and reabechment of this form to another document. Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: Document Date: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s) Signer's Name: [] Individual [] Corporate Officer Title(s): [] Partner- [] Limited [] General [] Attorney-in-Fact [] Trustee [] Guardian or Conservator [] Other: Top of thumb here Signer Is Representing: Number of Pages: Signer's Name: [] Individual [] Corporate Officer Title(s): [] Partner .--[] Limited [] General [] Attorney-in-Fact [] Trustee [] Guardian or Conservator ~ [] Other: Top of thumb here Signer is Representing: 1994 Natloni Notary ,~_e__e,'j,c~_.JX3n · 8236 I~ Ave., P.O. Box 7184 · C,,inog8 Park, CA 91309-7184 Plod. No. 5907 I~. Call ToP-Free 1.~00-~ LOT 97 PORTION OF LOT 97 OF TRACT NUMBER 22148 IN THE CITY OF TEMECUL~, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, AS RECORDED JUNE 22, 1989 IN BOOK 202 OF MAPS, AT PAGES 92-104, RECORDS OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, LYING WITHIN A PORTION OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 2 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 97, SAID CORNER BEING ALSO THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF LOT 96 AND BEING A POINT ON THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF LOT "E" OF SAID TRACT NUMBER 22148; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE NORTH 47°41'03" .'WEST A DISTANCE OF 105.09 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 97, NORTH 04°39'33" WEST A DISTANCE OF 20.52 FEET TO A POINT-ON THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF LOT "H" OF SAID TRACT NUMBER 22148; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHEASTERLY LINE NORTH 42°18'57" EAST A DISTANCE OF 11.65 FEEt; THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTHEASTERLY I.,INE, SOUTH 05°55'16" EAST A DISTANCE OF 27.68 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 47°56'21" EAST A DISTANCE OF 84;60 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 83e36'19" EAST 18.33 FEET TO A POINT ON THE COMMON LOT LINE OF SAD LOT 97 AND SAD LOT 96; THENCE ALONG SAID COMMOM LOT LINE OF SAD LOT 97 AND SAD LOT 96, SOUTH 42° 18'57" WEST A DISTANCE OF 18.35 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAD PARCEL CONTAINS 1053.1 SQUARE FEET, 0.024 ACRES MORE OR LESS. SUBJECT TO ALL COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONS, RIGHTS, RIGHTS OF WAY AND EASEMENTS, IF ANY, OF RECORD. Exp. 12/31/97 March 31, 1995 File No. ~vp51Xmor97.1gl Scale: 1' '= 50' :/' \\\\ ~/. l/x,,\\ 95 \,\\\ . .,/. Lot j~ k ~ . / ..~ k ~ ./' : ~/' ,,,or 82 '~ ./' , Lot 81 ""-, . e % · . :- · ~; "~ LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT Portion of lot 97 of Troct 2.2148 recorded June 2.2. 1989 oe shown by mop filed In Book 202. ~ 92-104 of Mop8. recurde of the County Recorder, Riverskl County. ~ of Colifomla. 'Recgrjed at request of and return to: City Clerks Department City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 FREE RECORDING This instrument is for the benefit of the City of Temecula and is entitled to be recorded without fee {Govt. Code 6103). IRREVOCABLE OFFER TO DEDICATE Parcel: Lots: 163,164,165,16( Project: Tract 22148 FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDEBATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, T,L1CRS '~, Mt~rc'i tmr 'r')~trm~l nprn~n'l- , Tllc ("Grantor'), hereby irrevocably offers to dedicate to the City of Temecula ('Grantee"), together with the' right to further grant or transfer the same to others, a perpetual easement and right-of-way for maintaining, operating, altering, repairing, and replacing equipment and landscaping over and within the boundaries of that certain real property located in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto, which is incorporated herein by this reference (the "Easement Area"). If GRANTEE, or its governmental entity, successors, or assigns, determines it is unable, incapable, or unwilling to maintain said Easement Area, maintenance shall, after notice, become the responsibility of GRANTOR, with all. covenants and agreements of this easement extending to and bBcoming obligations of all heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the ~,~:~OR. R~ck ~cier E March 28, 1995 DATED GRANTOR STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE On before me, the undersigned, A Notary Public in and for the State of California, personally .appeared , personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized .capacity(lee), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE This is to certify that the interest in real property conveyed by the within Irrevocable Offer To Dedicate to the City Temecula, a political Corporation and/or governmental agency, is hereby accepted by order of the City Council the date below and the Grantee consents to the recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer. Date ',,, June S. Greek, City Clerk 3elfon~mAr~ev .eed 013192 CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of C~ 1 t forn'i a County of On 3-28-95 before me, pemonally appeared R~ck ~.. Merc~er Terr$ L. lioman N~me,ndTlae~OBmt(e.g..',aneO~e. NmwyPul~ Name(s) ae S~}neqs) personally known to me - OR - [] proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/ara subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signatura(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon, behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNES ' . OPTIONAL Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another documanL Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: Document Date: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s) Signer's Name: [] Individual [] Corporate Officer Title(s): [] Partner--[] Limited [] General [] Attorney-in-Fact [] Trustee [] Guardian or Conservator [] Other: Top of ~umb hem Number of Pages: Signer's Name: [] Individual r--; Corporate Officer Title(s): [] Partner- [] Limited [] General [] Attorney-in-Fact [] Trustee [] Guardian or Conservator ~ [] Other: Top of thumb here Signer Is Representing: Signer Is Representing: O 1994 National Nolmy AMocialion * 8236 Reinroe Ave., P.O. Box 7184 · Canoga ParIt, CA 91309-7184 Prod. No. 5907 Reoa:lec C41 Tel-Free 1-800-r/6-6827 PARCEL "A" THOSE PORTIONS OF LOT 163, LOT 164, LOT 165 AND LOT 166 OF TRACT NIJMBER 22148 IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, AS RECORDED JUNE 22, 1989 IN BOOK 202 OF MAPS, AT PAGES 92-104, RECORDS OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, LYING WI'I}IIN A PORTION OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 2 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 166, SAID SOUTHERLY CORNER BEING ALSO A POINT ON THE NORTHEASTERLY LNE OF LOT "E" OF SAID TRACT NUMBER 22148; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY.' LINE, NORTH 47° 41 '03" WEST A DISTANCE OF 147.55 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE, NORTH 10°40'12" EAST A DISTANCE OF 30.35 FEET; THENCE NORTH 08°24'29" EAST A DISTANCE OF 32.89 Fl=-gr TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 166, SAID POINT BEING ALSO ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAD LOT 165 AND BEING SOUTH 62° 19'30" EAST A DISTANCE OF 15.21 FF:.F-T FROM THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 165; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 08°24'29" EAST A DISTANCE OF 4.94 FEET; TI-n=-NCE NORTH 11055'54" EAST A DISTANCE OF 30.29 FI=.RT TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 165, SAID POINT ALSO BEING ON THE SOUTI-r!=-RLY LINE OF SAID LOT 164 AND BEING SOUTH 75°42'15" EAST A DISTANCE OF 14.01 FEET FROM THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 164; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 11055'54" EAST A DISTANCE OF 16.84 Fl=-gr; TI-TgNCE NORTH 10°40'12" EAST A DISTANCE OF 43.51 FEET; THENCE NORTH 18°49'00" EAST A DISTANCE OF 3.47 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAD LOT 164, SAD POINT BEING ALSO ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 163 AND BEING SOUTH 77°27'51" EAST A DISTANCE OF 12.79 FEET FROM THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 163; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 18049'00" EAST A DISTANCE OF 36.94 FF-gr; THENCE SOUTH 09° 12'30" WEST A DISTANCE OF 36.78 Fl=.gr TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 163, SAID POINT ALSO BEING ON THE NORTI-rF-RLY LINE OF SAID LOT 164; TI-rI=-NCE CONTINUING SOUTH 09° 12'30" WEST A DISTANCE OF 2.16 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 11°12'58" WEST A DISTANCE OF 44.13 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 12° 14'57" WEST A DISTANCE OF 17.69 Fl=-gr TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 164, SAID POINT BEING ALSO ON THE NORTHF-RLY LINE OF SAID LOT 165; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 12° 14'57" WEST A DISTANC!E OF 36.57 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 165, SAID POINT BEING ALSO ON THE NORTHI=~RLY LINE OF SAID LOT 166; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 12° 14'57" WEST A DISTANCE OF 63.12 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 67049'50" EAST A DISTANCE OF 68.53 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 41002'27" EAST A DISTANCE OF 62.04 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 08° 12'53" EAST A DISTANCE OF 11.77 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 84°51'41" EAST A DISTANCE OF 23.37 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 47041'03" EAST A File No. wpSl\mor163-6.1gl DISTANCE OF 5.82 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTI-~ASTEP, LY LINE OF SAID LOT 166, SAID POINT ALSO BEING ON THE NOR~Y LINE OF LOT "H" OF SAID TRACT NUMBER 22148; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY LINE, SOUTH 42° 18'57" WEST A DISTANCE OF 9.07 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89° 17'27" WEST 20.52 ~ TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAD PARCEL CONTAINS 3,418.1 SQUARE I~-R:T, 0.079 ACRES MORE OR LESS. SUBtCT TO ALL COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONS, RIGHTS, RIGHTS OF WAY AND EASEMt:-NTS, IF ANY, OF RECORD. SEE EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERErO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF. PARCEL "B" THOSE PORTIONS OF LOT "E" AND LOT "H" OF TRACT NUMBER 22148 IN THE CITY OF TE1VIECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, AS RECORDED JUNE 22, 1989 IN BOOK 202 OF MAPS, AT PAGES 92-104, RECORDS OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, STATE OF CAI.IFORNIA, LYING WITHIN A PORTION OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 2 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, AND MORE PARTICLFLARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTH!u~ASTERLY CORNER OF LOT 166 OF SAID TRACT NUMBER 22148, SAID SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER BEING ALSO A POINT ON THE NORTH EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT "E"; TItENCE LEAVING SAID NORTItEASTERLY I.INE NORTH-89° 17'27" EAST A DISTANCE OF 20.52 Fl:.l:rr TO A POINT ON THE NORTHVv'ESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT "H" ; THENCE LEAVING SAID NORT~TERLY LINE, SOUTH 47°41'03" EAST A DISTANCE OF 7.33 FI~.I?r; TI-tENCE SOUTH 89°17'27" WF, ST A DISTANCE OF 27.85 lq:~l:;iT; TItF-NCE NORTH 47°41'03" WF.,ST A DISTANCE 167.43 FI:-I:~T; TItENCE NORTH 12°32'09" EAST A DISTANCE OF 5.76 FEET TO A POINT ON A NONTANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY WITH RADIUS OF 267.00 FEET, SAID POINT BEING ALSO THE SOIEHWESTERLY CORNER OF LOT 166 OF SAID TRACT NUMBER 22148, THE RADIAL LINE TO SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 42°27'48" WEST; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAD CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 00° 08'51 ' AN ARC DISTANCE OF 0. 69 FEET; THENCE TANGENT TO SAm CURVE ALONG THE SOIEHWESTERLY LINE OF LOT 166 OF SAID TRACT NUMBER 22148, SOUTH 47°41'03" EAST A DISTANCE OF 167.64 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID PARCEL CONTAINS 960.1 SQUARE FEET, 0.022 ACE MORE OR LESS. File No. wpSl\mor163-6.1gl SUBJECT TO ALL COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONS, RIGHTS, RIGHTS OF WAY AND EASEMENTS, IF ANY, OF RECORD. EXHIBIT "B" ATrACI-n=,r} I-tHeRETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART I-rF~REOF. ,.No. 2~08.0 ~1i F~e No. wpSl\mor163-6.lgl Lot 162 A UNE DIRECTION ~/'0 L1 N10'4O'12"E 30.35' ~~ \ / L2 S 8'24'29"W 32,89' ' 1,3 N 8'24'29"E: 4.94' L4 S11'55'54°W L5 N11'55'5~'E 16.84' L6 $1 ff40'12"W 43,51' N1~49' L7 00' 3.47' L8 NI$4g~O'E 3,94' 1,9 $ 9'12'30'W 36,78' LIO N 9'12'30'E 2.16' Lll Sl1'12'58'W 44,13' L12 $1~14'57'W 17.69' L13 S12' 14'57" W 38.57* L14 $1~14'57"W 63.12' kl 5 S67'49'50" E 68.53' L16 S41'02'27" E 62.04' L17 S 8'12'53'E 11.77' L18 SB,F51'41'E 23.37' kl 9 S,I,7'41 '03' E 5.82' 120 N 42' 18'57" E 9.07' 121 NBO'17'27"E 20,~2' L22 S47'41'03"E 7.$3' 123 S89'17'27"W 27,85' talatl~ EXHIBIT "B" LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT Portion, of Lot 163. Let 164 Lot 165, Let 166, Lot 'E', and Lot ,~ft, of Tract 2214~ recorded June 22, 1989 as shown by mop filed in Book 202. Page 92-10~ of Maps, records of the County Recorcler. Riveaide County, St~e of California. Lot 97 \ % \ \ \ \ \ %. \ scow: 1' -' 50' ~~,~7~ Lot 163 " ,~, v ~,~~ ;""' -, ~/ · ~s'42'x~;;tS ffcj~ '~' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' - - -~'/ '~.\ . , ------__~/ ~ ~t 16~ : ~/ , ~;...~ -. - __ _ _ Recorded at request of and return to: City Clerks Department City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 FREE RECORDING This instrument is for the benefit of the City of Temecula and is enffied to be recorded without fee (Govt. Cede 6103). IRREVOCABLE OFFER TO DEDICATE Parcel: APN # 9143100097 Project: Tract 22148 L l~':,l~ -* ~ FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, George Wimpey Inc. dba Morrison Homes ("Grantor'), hereby irrevocably offers to dedicate to the City of Temecula ("Grantee"), together with the right to furlher grant or transfer the same to others, a perpetual easement and right-of way for maintaining, operations, altering, repairing, and replacing equipment and landscaping over and within the boundaries of that certain real property located in the City of Temecula, County of riverside, more particularly described in Exhibit 'W' attached hereto, which is incorporated herein by this reference (the "Easement Area"). If GRANTEE, or its govemmental entity, successors, or assigns, determines it is unable, incapable, or unwilling to maintain said Easement Area, maintenance shall, after notice, become the responsibility of GRANTOR, with,, all covenants and agreements of this easement exte ng to and becoming obligations of all heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of th k)'~'~r ,~' ) DATED STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE On r ~ }c~q ~) b ore e ~e undersigned, A Notan/Public in and for the State of Califomia, personally appeared I'J '~,;.~',.L"~a kC~ ~.' . perso.ally k.o,,., to .,. Cor pro,,ed to ,-. on th. ba.-.is of .,.~.=,,/.~..c.) to be th. authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the enffiy upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS ~ Signature ~ CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE This is to certify that the interest in real property conveyed by the within Irrevocable Offer To Dedicate to the City ofTemecula, a political corporation and/or governmental agency, is hereby accepted by order of the City Council the date below and the Grantee consents to the recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer. "' Date June S. Greek, City Clerk EXHIBIT "A" LOT 167, LOT 168, LOT 169 AND THOSE PORTIONS OF LOT A OF TRACT NUMBER 22148 IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, AS RECORDED IUNE 22, 1989 IN BOOK 202 OF MAPS, AT PAGES 92-104, RECORDS OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, LYING WITHIN A PORTION OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 2 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PARCEL "A" LOT 167 SAID PARCEL CONTAINS 31,132 SQUARE FEET, 0.715 ACRES MORE OR LESS. PARCEL"B" LOT 168 SAID PARCEL CONTAINS 6,045 SQUARE FEET, 0.139 ACRES MORE OR LESS. PARCEL "C" LOT 169 SAID PARCEL CONTAINS 1,189 SQUARE FEET, 0.027 ACRF_~ MORE OR LESS. PARCEL"D" BEGINNING AT THE MOST SOUTI-~-RLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 167, SAID SOUTI-~RLY CORNER, B1=,tNG ALSO A POINT ON THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT "A; THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE, SOUTH 12°32'09" WEST A DISTANCE OF 7.61 ~ TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF A NONTANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY WITH RADIUS OF 272.00 FEET, THE RADIAL LINE TO SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 60°52'27" WEST; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 36°04'56* AN ARC DISTANCE OF 171.29 FEET; THENCE TANGENT TO SAID CURVE NORTH 6°57'23" EAST A DISTANCE OF 221.69 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OP A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY WITH RADIUS OF 328.00FEET; ~CE NORTI-IF~RLY AND NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAD CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 36°04'21" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 206.50 I~.I:~T; THENCE TANGENT TO SAD CURVE NORTH 29°06'58" WEST A DISTANCE OF 19.97 FEET; THENCE NORTH 13°54'53"EAST A DISTANCE OF 24.90' FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID Fiis No. wl~!~otl6'Lg.Igl TRACT 22 148; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE SOUTH 29°08'03" EAST A DISTANCE OF 7.32 FEET TO THE MOST NORTHERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 167; THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF LOT SAID 167, SOUTH 13°54'53" WEST A DISTANCE OF 17.58 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 29°06'58" EAST A DISTANCE OF 18.00 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY WITH RADIUS OF 333.00 FF-Frr; THENCE SOUTH EASTERLY AND SOUTHERLY ALONG THE CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 36°04'21" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 209.65 FEET; THENCE TANGENT TO SAID CURVE SOUTH 6°57'23" WEST A DISTANCE OF 221.69 FEET TO THE BEGBq'NING OF A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY WITH RADIUS OF 267.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 34°51'42" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 162.46 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID PARCEL CONTAINS 3,182.7 SQUARE FEET, 0.073 ACRES MORE OR LESS. PARCEL "E" BEGINNING AT THE MOST NORTHERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 168, BEING ALSO A POINT ON THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT 22148; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHWF_,STERLY LINE OF LOT SAID 168, SOUTH 13°54'33" WEST A DISTANCE OF 17.31 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 29°06'58" EAST A DISTANCE OF 495.57 FEET; TI-IF~NCE SOUTH 72°08'28" EAST A DISTANCE OF 17.55 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT 22148; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHF~STERLY LINE SOUTH 29 °08 '0~3" EAST A DISTANCE OF 7.33 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE, NORTH 72°08'28"WEST A DISTANCE OF 24.88 FEET; THENCE NORTH 29°06'58" WEST A DISTANCE OF 499.51 FEET; THENCE NORTH 13°54'33" .EAST A DISTANCE OF 24.63 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT NU1VIBER 22148; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE SOUTH 29°08'03. EAST A DISTANCE OF 7.33 FF-h'rI' TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID PARCEL CONTAINS 2,698.1 SQUARE FlufF:T, 0,062 ACRF.~ MORE OR LESS. PARCI::-I. "F" BEGINNING AT THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 169, BEING ALSO A POINT ON TEE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT NUMBER 22148; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE, SOUTH 29°08'03" EAST A DISTANCE OF 7.17 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE, -NORTH 73°19'41" WEST A DISTANCE OF 24.58 FEEt TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF A NONTANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY WITH RADIUS OF 428.00 FEET, THE RADIAL LINE TO SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 58°35'01" EAST; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 13°54'10" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 103.85 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT Fd~ No. wpSl'~ot'!67-9.,lgl NUMBER 22148, THE RADIAL LINE TO SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 44°40'51" EAST; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE SOUTH 66°09'32* EAST A DISTANCE OF 13.54 FEET TO THE MOST NORTHERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 169, SAID NORTHERLY CORNER BEING ALSO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF A NONTANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SO~TERLY WITH RADIUS OF 433.00 FEET, THE RADIAL LINE TO SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 46°21'18" EAST; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 11°58'29* AN ARC DISTANCE OF 90.50 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 73°19'41* EAST A DISTANCE OF 17.52 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID PARCEL CONTAINS 590.7 SQUARE FEET, 0.014 ACRES MORE OR LESS~ SUBJECT TO ALL COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND KESERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONS, RIGHTS, RIGHTS OF WAY AND EASEMENTS, IF ANY, OF RECORD. SEE EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO AND BY TI-IIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF. Gar~y~fpska RCE 30 0 Exp. 12/31/97 F~ Ne. wl~l~motl6'7-9.l~! sc~t,, 1' - ~0' ~. ~ · 'l ~i ." .,!.~..0.~=. i ~,i::' Parcel \ \ · ~I3*S4'S3'V ' 7.3;" k24.90' k 17.58' N29'O6'Se'V · · d29'O6'Se'V 19.97' X 18.00' NPg*OB'O3'V EXHIBIT Sheet 1 of 2 Sheets LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT Lot 167 ond portion of IotA' of Tract 22148 r~c0rdsd June 2.2, 1969 o8 8hown by mop filed in Book 202, Poge, 92--104 of mops, records of the County Recorder, Riverside County. State of Collfomla. N12'38'09 7.61' t 169~;'\ :,%- o. Parcel "C" Parcel "~ ~ ,-r'~ ~ · ../ P.O.B. @ N2g'OB'O3'W ~ 7.33' N13'54'33'E ' 24.63' P .O.:B. ' \ N13'54'3YE ~ 17.31' LINE: BIP, ECTD3N DISTANCE: LI N'/3*Ig'41'V 24,58' L2 N66*Og'32'V 13.54' L3 N73'19'41'V 17.52' L4 N66°Og"3i?.'V 49,52' L5 N29*OB'O3'V 67.95' /Parcel "E" 168 Parcel "B" CURVE LENGTH DELTA RADIUS i~ I,%%. I' "='~' ,=,.,,,' I~:o%°:1 Sheet 2 of 2 Sheets \ LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT Lot 168, Lot 169 and portion of Lot 'A' of Tract 22148 recorded June 22. 1989 e shown by map filed in Book 202, Page 92-104. of Male. records of the County Recorder, Riverde County, State of California. . N'~OB,28~W 24-88i Recorded at request of and return to: City Clerks Department City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 FREE RECORDING: Parcol:Lots 8,9,36,37,38,A This instrument is for the benefit of the City 2-7 & B Lots 67-73 of Temecula and is entitled to be recorded without fee Project:Tract #22916-0 (Govt. Code 8103). IRREVOCABLE OFFER TO DEDICATE FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged Taylor Woodrow Homes Califomia Limited ("Grantor'), hereby irrevocably offers to dedicate to the City of Temecula ("Grantee"), together with the right to further grant or transfer the same to others, a perpetual easement and right-of-way for maintaining, operating, altering, repairing, and replacing equipment and landscaping over and within the boundaries of that certain real property located in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto, which is incorporated herein by this reference (the "Easement Area"). If GRANTEE, or its governmental entity, successors, or assigns, determines it is unable, incapable, or unwilling to maintain said Easement Area, maintenance shall, after notice, become the responsibility of GRANTOR, with all covenants and agreements of this easement extending to and becoming obligations of all heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the GRANTOR. GRANTOR lw~LV 9. 1995 DATED STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE On ~ {:J , I ~'before me, the undersigned, A Notary Public in and for the State of~alifornia, personally appeared }EFF~.-'r. J. P~-c~'~c~personally known to me (or proved to mo en tho bar.,ie of eatiofac, tr~ry ¢victonc¢),to be the person(~) whose names(,~) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/sho/the~ executed the same in his/hor/thoir authorized capacity(-ies,), and that by his/hc, r/thsif signature(s) on the instrument the person(e-), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(-s.) acted, executed the instrument. ' ,~ No~a.'~ publk: - c,--ditornia ERTIF!CATE OF ACCEPTA!~IE::~ ' This is to certify that the interest in real property conveyed by the within irrevocable Offer to Dedicate to the City of Temecula, a political corporation and/or governmental agency, is hereby accepted by order of the City Council the data below and the Grantee consents to the recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer. DATE June S. Greek, City Clerk ROBERT BEIN, WILLIAM FROST AND ASSOCIATES 28765 Single Oak Drive, Suite 250 Temecula, California 92590 LEGAL DESCRIPTION Revised January 17, 1995 October 22, 1990 JN 24871-R10 Page1 of 3 CSD - LANDSCAPE RAINTENANCE EASERENT TRACT NO. 22916 PARCEL I That certain parcel of land situated in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, being those portions of Lots 8, 9, 36, 37, 38 and "A" of Tract No. 22916 as shown on a map thereof filed in Book 225, Pages 65 through 72 of Naps in the Office of the County Recorder of said Riverside County, described as follows: BEGINNING at a point in that certain course in the southwesterly line of said Lot 8 shown as "North 18'53'00" West 171.08 feet" distant thereon North 18'53'00" West 84.00 feet from the southeasterly terminus thereof; thence South 71'07'00" West 6.00 feet to a line parallel and/or concentric with and 6.00 feet southwesterly from the northeasterly line of said Lot "A'; thence along said parallel and/or concentric line through the following courses: North 18'53'00" West 327.47 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave easterly and having a radius of 1456.00 feet; thence along said curve northerly 185.39 feet through a central angle of 7'17'43"; thence leaving said parallel and/or concentric line, radially from said curve North 78'24'43" East 32.56 feet to a point on a non-tangent curve concave easterly and having a radius of 1600.00 feet, a radial line of said curve from said point bears North 74'10'26" East; thence along said curve southerly 201.24 feet through a central angle of 7'12'23" to a point on the northwesterly line of said Lot 9 distant thereon North 71'07'00" East 40.00 feet from the most westerly corner thereof; thence South 32'27'25" West 32.02 feet; thence South 21'27'34" East 200.25 feet to the southeasterly line of said Lot 9; thence South 19'13'06" East 87.08 feet to a line bearing North 71'07'00" East from the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence South 71'07'00" West 24.51 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING: 0.38 Acres, more or less. Robert Bein, William Frost and Associates CSO-Landscape Maintenance Easement Tract No. 22916 Revised January 17, 1995 October 22, 1990 JN 24871-M10 Page 2 of 3 PARCEL 2- That certain parcel of land situated in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, being those portions of Lots 2 through 7 and:'B" of Tract No. 22916 as shown on a map thereof filed in Book 225, Pages 65 through 72 of Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of said Riverside County, described as follows: BEGINNING at the southeasterly corner of said Lot 2; thence along the southerly prolongation of the easterly line of said lot South 8'15'30' East 6.00. feet to a line parallel and/or concentric with and 6.00 feet southerly from the northerly line of said Lot 'B"; thence along said parallel and/or concentric line through the following courses: South 81'44'30" West 270.00 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave southerly and having a radius of 1238.00 feet; thence along said curve westerly 54.40 feet through a central angle of 2'31'04"; thence leaving said parallel and/or concentric line, radially from said curve North 10'46'34' West 27.82 feet to a point on a non-tangent curve concave southerly and having a radius of 1300.00 feet, a radial line of said curve from said point bears South g'53'40" East; thence along said curve easterly 54.47 feet through a central angle of 2'24'02'; thence tangent from said curve North 82'30'22" East 151.16 feet to the easterly line of said Lot 4; thence North 83'39'01" East 120.07 feet to said easterly line of Lot 2; thence along said easterly line South 8'15'30" East 15.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING: 0.19 Acres, more or less. PARCEL 3 That certain parcel of land situated in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, being those portions of Lots 67 through 73 and "B" of Tract No. 22916 as shown on a map thereof filed in Book 225, Pages 65 through 72 of Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of said Riverside County, described as follows: .BEGINNING at the southwesterly corner of said Lot 73; Robert Bein, William Frost and Associates CSD-Landscape Maintenance Easement Tract No. 22916 Revised January 17, 1995 October 22, 1990 JN 24871-M10 Page 3 of 3 thence along the westerly line of said lot North 8'15'30" West 9.40 feet; thence North 82'34'16" East 62.01 feet to the easterly line of said Lot 73; thence North 83'21'30" East 124.05 feet to the easterly line of said Lot 71; thence North 67'5Z'58' East 12.52 feet to a point on a non-tangent curve concave northerly, having a radius of 1148.00 feet and being concentric with and 8.00 feet northerly from a curve in the northerly line of said Lot 'B" having a radius of 1156.00 feet, a radial line of said curve from said point bears' North 8'15'30' West; thence along said concentric curve easterly 322.98 feet through a central angle of 16'07'11" to the easterly line of said Lot 67; thence radially from said curve, along said easterly line and the southerly prolongation thereof South 24'22'41' East 14.00 feet to a point on a non-tangent curve concave northerly, having a radius of 1162.00 feet and being concentric with and 6.00 feet southerly from said curve in the northerly line of Lot "B'; thence along said concentric curve westerly 326.92 feet through a central angle of 16'07'11'; thence tangent from said curve South 81'44'30" West 198.16 feet to the southerly prolongation of said westerly line of Lot 73; thence along said southerly prolongation North 8'15'30" West 6.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING: 0.17 Acres, more or less. SUBJECT TO all Covenants, Rights, Rights-of-Way and-Easements of Record. EXHIBIT "B" attached and by this reference made a part hereof. Lawrence L. Bacon, L.S. 3527 4~ 5~ 58 \k SHEET I OP I SHEET R£ ws,, D H .8 7 .PARCEl ~V4 y ~Reco~ded at request of and return to: City Clerks Department City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 FREE RECORDING This instrument is for the benefit of the City of Temecula and is entitled to be recorded without fee (Govt. Code 6103). IRREVOCABLE OFFER TO DEDICATE Parcel: Tract ~22916-, Lots 3,4,and "A" Project: Vintage Hills FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, · r~ye~, ~ ~llfnrnln f'-pn~r~l P~rrner~hip ('Grantor'), hereby irrevocably offers to dedicate to the City of Temecula ("Grantee'), together with the right to further grant or transfer the same to others, a perpetual easement and right-of-way for maintaining, operating, altering, repairing, and replacing equipment and landscaping over and within the boundaries of that certain real property located in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto, which is incorporated herein by this reference .(the "Easement Area"). If GRANTEE, or its governmental entity, successors, or assigns, determines it is unable, incapable, or unwilling to maintain said Easement Area, maintenance shall, after notice, become the responsibility of GRANTOR, with all.' covenants and agreements of this easement extending to and becoming obligations of all heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of (OFFICIN, NOTARY SEAL LAURAL OHARA NeaP/Pulic--i ORNIGECOtNW · 'personaJ]y k~own to m~, or ~ proved (o m~ on th~ basis of ~dsfaGo~ ~) ~¢ace to b~ the p~soa(s) whose a;¢(s) i~ subsGi~d to ~¢ withia :{ ias(mm~m a~d a~nowlCdScd to m~ tha~;¢~x~cmCd ~h~ ~m¢ in ~ ~her/their auffiorized Gpadty(ies), and that by~er/ffieir signa- -' ture(s) on the ins~ment the ~rson(s), or the entity upon ~half of ~ which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. :, WCere. ames nJ~oLne5 WR"NESS my hand and/~ffici s¢ 1. " ': Notary Seal: ignature s;,l s:s tu x;~tuey uslt tHt~ itettlte~it itl teal prope~ conveyeo Oy ~e w~l~ i~evocaDle uner io ueolca;e to Temecula, a polhical coloration and/or governmental agency, is hereby accepted by order of the CiW Council ~e date below and ~e Gmnxe consen~ to ~e recoffi~on ~ereof by ~ duly a~hodzed officer. Date June S. Greek, City Clerk 3e/feemebeev.ded 013112 ROBERT BEIN, WILLIAR FROST AND ASSOCIATES 28765 Single Oak Drive, Suite Z50 Temecula, California 92390 LEGAL DESCRIPTION CSD - LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT TRACT NO. 22916-2 October 22, 1990 JN 24871-M7 Page 1of i That certain parcel of land situated in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, being those portions of .Lots 3, 4 and "A" of Tract No. 22916-2 as shown on a map thereof filed in Book 225, Pages 51 through 56 of Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of said Riverside County, described as follows: BEGINNING at the most westerly corner of said Lot 4; thence along the northwesterly line of said lot North 78'00'00" East 42'.50 feet; thence South 40'58'15" West 49.93 feet; thence South 13'47'46" East 340.12 feet; thence South 81'20'00" West 38.68 feet to a line parallel and/or concentric with and 6.00 feet southwesterly from the northeasterly line of said Lot "A"; thence along said parallel and/or concentric line through the following courses: North 8'40'00" West 295.95 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave westerly and having a radius of 1244.00 feet; thence along said curve northerly 72.37 feet through a central angle of 3'20'00" to the northwesterly line of said Lot A; thence leaving said parallel and/or concentric line, along said northwesterly line, radially from said curve North 78'00'00"' East 6.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING: 0.20 Acres, more or less. SUBJECT TO all Covenants, Rights, Rights-of-Way and Easements of Record. EXHIBIT 'B' attached and by this reference made a part hereof. ~c,O ~.AND S~,, :. Lawrence L. Bacon, ,L.S. 3527 E . ~OF IITRACT NO. 2291E_~3 M.B. 225 / 57-E4 Z4 Z7 ~IEET I of,r ,-~£ET PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS, Pt. ANNEI~ & SURVEYORS (7~4) f/14042 · FAX f~4) e/I-l'Ne OCT:. 2~2, !fro ,ZN. 24e7~ EXEMFr RECORDING REQUESTED BY City of Temccula PER OOV'T CODE § 6103 AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: Office of the City Clerk City of Tcmecula 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 MArt- TAX STATENIENTS TO: City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE GRANT The undersigned grantor declares: FOR A VALUABI-~ CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, JLD Properties, A California General Partnership hereby grants to the CITY OF TEMECULA, a body corporate and politic, the following described real property in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of C~llfomia: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Executed on May 8 ,1995 at California. Lake Forest 3e/feme/grendeed 013192 ACKNOWr ,r~DGMENT STATE OF CAL,WORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE On Hay 8, 1995 before me, the undersigned, A Notary Public in and for the State of California, personally appeared Gary R. Dix . personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the J ...... MyCOk,'l~. '1001681 WITNESS my hand and official seal. i Note~/~ -- C,,oifomio CONSENT The City of Temecula hereby consents to the grant of real property set forth above. ATTEST: By~ June S. Greek, City Clerk City of Temecula By: Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Peter Thorson, City Attorney 3e/fefms/gwvM:le~d 013192 EXHIBIT.'A' LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS Those portions of Tract 25004-1 per Map Book 241 pages 29-3S, records of Riverside County, California, described as follows: LOT 57 Lot 57 of said Tract 73004-1. PARCEL *A* , BEGINNING at the westerly most point of Lot 57 of said Tract 25004-1; thence South 89o43'2.?' West 18.60 feet; thence North 10016'54" East 10.03 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave to the southeast having a radius of 25.00 feet; thence along said curve through a central angle of 90'00'00" a distance of 39.27 feet; thence South 79043' 06' East 35.88 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve cOncave to the north and having a radius of 312.00 feet; thence along said curve through a central angle of 10033'29" a' distance of 57.49 feet; thence Noah 89043'29" East 264.75 feet to the cusp of a non- tangent curve concave to the northwest having a radius of 70.00 feet, a radial through said point bears North 53°24'23" West; thence along said curve through a central angle of 22007'38" a distance of 27.03 feet; thence South 89043'25" West 244.81 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave to the north having a radius of 330.00 feet; thence along said curve through a central angle of 10033~9" a distance of 60.81 feet; thence North 79043'06" West 29.88 feet; thence South 53°18'24" West 18.63 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL "B" BEGINNING at the southeasterly most comer of said Tract 25004-1; thenee South 89043'25" West 272.54 feet to the beginning of a non-tangent curve concave to the west having a radius of 1490.00 feet; thence along said curve through a central angle of 02°48'21" a distance of 72.97 feet; thence North 02°42'13" East 1196.93 feet; thence South 89°57'17" East 211.17 feet; thence South 00002'43, West 401.51 feet; thence South 00°00'00" West 865.37 feet to the .POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL "C" BEGINNING at the Southwest comer of Lot 33 of said Tract 25004-1; thence North 89°43'25" East 120.00 feet; thence North 03°18'16" East 123.98 feet; thence North 00°55'54" West 253.43 feet; thence North 04°11'34" East 129.02 feet; thence North 01°59'21" East 261.37 feet; thence North 03°18'16" East 469.24 feet; thence NOrth 13°48'52" East 96.60 feet; thence South 87o17'47" East 20.00 feet; thence South 02°42'13" West 1289.93 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave to the west having a radius of 1490.00 feet; thence along said curve through a central angle of 02°48'21" a distance of 72.97 feet; thence South 89043'25" West 173.92 feet to the cusp of a non-tangent curve concave to the west having a radius of 70.00 feet, a radial line through said point bean North 31°16'45" West; thence along said curve through a central angle of 36°18'33" a distance of 44.36 feet .to the POINT OF BEGINNING. 5/ . ANDREWS WAY ,S rJ LOT D _7500d-1 ,,x. -. CURVE D~L TA RADIUS tEN&'TH CI 10'33'29" 330.00" 60.81' C2 90 '00 '00" 25.00 ' 39. 03 10 '33 '29' 312.00 ' 57. 49 ' C4 14'I0"55' 70.00' I7.33" C5 22'07'3B" 70.00' 27.03' C6 36'18'33' 70.00' 44.36' C7 02 '48 '21 "' 1490. O0 ' 72.97' LINE BEARING D/STANCE LI NS3'IB'24'E 18.63' L2 NTg'43'O6'W 29,88' t 3 N89' 43 '25 "E ! 04.83 ' L4 N89'dJ'26'E 18.60' L5 N10 ' 16 '54 *E lO. 03 ' L6 NRg '43 '25 "E 264.75' L 7 N89 ' 43 '25 *E 24 4, 81 ' L B NB9 '43 '25 *E 12O. O0 · L9 NOJ'tB'I6'E 123.98' L lO NO0 '56 '54 'W 253.43 ' tl? N04'll '34"E 129.02' L 72 NO! '59 '21 'E 26?, JT' LI3 N79'43'O6'W 35,8B' THE CITY OF TEMECULA HEREBY TAKES POSSESSION OF THE OPEN SPACE LOT 57 AND PARCELS A, B AND C RETROACll.~' TO THE VESTED TENTATIVE MAP APPROVAL DATE OF OCTOBER 13, 1990. 44 42 41 4O 3~ 37 N8777'47'W 20.00' NBg :57'? 7'W 2H. PARCEL 1.288 AC PARCEL 7.009 AC TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICr · · BIIIlIBtlIQ AIBO~JATE8 MOil P.O. BOx 6087 · 92412 F~e (909)B~4--M04 FAX (~)~-6143 t A =, ,- --, .,-. ~..---.-,,-,.LANDSCAPE DEDICA T/ON PLA r PARCEL "A " 0.161 AC 3 ~'~"~ pZ'~~~~ ~L ', ' ~' ' 3~8 272. 54' ITEM 3 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: Community Services Board of Directors FROM: Ronald E. Bradley, General Manager DATE: May 23, 1995 SUBJECT: PREPARED BY: Award Professional Services Contract for Materials Testing During the Construction of Rancho California Sports Park Improvement Project No. PW94-O7CSD Edward Stone, Assistant Engineer - Capital Projects RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors: Award a Professional Services Contract to Geotechnical and Environmental Engineers, Inc. (GEE) to provide material testing services during the construction of Rancho California Sports Park Improvement Project No. PW94-07CSD, in an amount not to exceed $18,634· Appropriate $18,634 for the services contract and $1,864 for 10% contingency for a total of $20,498 from Development Impact Fees to the Capital Project Fund. BACKGROUND: On April 25, 1995 the Board of Directors awarded the construction contract for Rancho California Sports Park Improvement Project No. PW94-O7CSD to E.A. Mendoza Contracting. It is anticipated that construction will begin during the month of June, 1995. As noted in the approved specifications, the City is responsible for providing material testing services. The scope of services to be provided for this project include, but are not limited to the observation of rough grading, masonry construction, and foundation preparation. GEE will also provide testing of concrete and masonry units, reinforcing steel, parking area sub-grade, and soil compaction. GEE was selected from the City's qualified consultant list for professional services. Consultants are selected on a rotating basis for each project. A project specific scope of services is developed with a fee not to exceed the negotiated contract amount. FISCAL IMPACT: The construction project is being funded by Development Impact Fees and community donations. The materials testing service contract is in the amount of ~18,634 plus the 10% contingency of ~ 1,864. An additional ~20,498 needs to be transferred from the Development Impact Fee fund to the Capital Projects fund appropriated to Account No. 210-190-137-5804. ATTACHMENTS: Professional Services Contract -2- c~,d~WS~O~23~w~..07 Jwd:ajp PROFESSIONAL SERVICES This Agreement was made and entered into this 23rd day of May, 1995, by and between the City of Temecula ("City"), a municipal corporation, and Geotechrdcal & Environmental Engineers, Inc., a California Corporation ("Consultant"). The parties her·to mutually agree as follows: elI · Services. Consultant shall perform the tasks set forth in Exhibit "A" attached her·to. Consultant shall complete the tasks according to the schedule set forth in Exhibit "A". Performance. Consultant shall at all times, faithfully, industrially and to the best of his ability, experience and talent, perform all tasks described her·in. m Payment. The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, at the hourly rates set forth in Exhibit "B" attached her·to, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. This amount will not exceed $18,634.00for the total term of the Agreement unless additional payment is approved by the City Council; provided that the City Manager may approve additional payment not to exceed ten percent (10%) of the Agreement; but in no event more than $10,000. Consultant will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed. Invoices shall be submitted on or about the first business day of each month, for services provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice. Amendments. This Agreement may be amended so long as such amendment is in writing and agreed upon by both the City Council and Consultant. Ownership of Documents. Upon satisfactory completion of or in the e~/ent of termination, suspension or abandonment of this Agreement, all original documents, designs, dr.awings, and notes prepared in the course of providing the services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission of the Consultant. Termination. The City may terminate this Agreement without cause so long as written notice of intent to terminate is given to Consultant at least three (3) days prior to the termination date. In the event of termination, Consultant shall be paid for the services performed. Indemnification. The Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify, protect and save harmless the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, losses, defense cost, or liability of any kind or nature which the City, its officers, agents and employees may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of Consultant's acts or omissions under the terms of this Agreement, excepting only liability arising out of the sole negligence of the City. - 1 - r:%cip~orojects~owg4-O7~,geotech.agrlajp e 10. 11. Status of Consultant. Consultant is an independent contractor in all respects in the performance of this Agreement and shall not be considered an employee of the City for any purpose. No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for performing services her. under for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of performing services her.under. Tqrm. This Agreement shall commence on May 23, 1995, and shall remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than May 23, 1996. Default. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under the terms of this* Agreement, the City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work performed after the date of default. Default shall include not performing the tasks described her. in to the reasonable satisfaction of the City Manager of the City. Failure by the Consultant to make progress in the performance of work hereunder, if such failure arises out of causes beyond his control, and without fault or negligence of the Consultant, shall not be considered a default. Any disputes regarding performance, default or other matters in dispute between the City and the Consultant arising out of this Agreement or breech thereof, shall be resolved by arbitration. The arbitrator's decision shall be final. Consultant shall select an arbitrator from a list provided by the City of three retired judges of the Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services, Inc. The arbitration hearing shall be conducted according to California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1280, et seo. City and Consultant shall share the cost of the arbitration equally. Notices. Notices shall be given pursuant to this Agreement by personal service on the party to be notified, or by written notice upon such party deposited in the custody of the United States Postal Service addressed as follows: ee City: City of Temecula Attention: Ronald E. Bradley, City Manager 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 Consultant: Geotechnical & Environmental Engineers, Inc. Attention: Jim Harrison 27447 Enterprise Circle, West Temecula, CA 92590 The notices shall be deemed to have been given as of the date of personal service, or three (3) days after the date of deposit of the same in the custody of the United States Postal Service. - 2 - r:%cip%p rojects~p w94-07\geotech.egrlajp 12. 13. 14. 15. Entire Aoreement. This Agreement and any documents or instrument attached hereto or referred to herein integrate all terms and conditions mentioned herein or incidental hereto supersede all negotiations and prior writing in respect to the subject matter hereof. In the event of conflict between the terms, conditions, or provisions of this Agreement and any such document or instrument, the terms and conditions of this Agreement shall prevail. Leaal Resoonsibilities. The Consultant shall keep itself informed of State and Federal laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it 'or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Consultant shall at all times observe and comply with all such laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and employees, shall .not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Consultant to comply with this section. Assianment. The Consultant shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without the prior written consent of the City. Upon termination of this Agreement, Consultant's sole compensation shall be the value to the City of the services rendered. LiabiliW Insurance. The Consultant shall maintain insurance acceptable to the City in full force and effect throughout the term of this contract, against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, his agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors. Insurance is to be placed with insurer with a Beets' rating of no less than A:VII. The costs of such insurance shall be included in the Contractor's bid. The Consultant shall provide the following scope and limits of insurance: Minimum Scooe of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as: Insurance Services OTfice Form No. GL-0002 (Ed. 1/73) covering Comprehensive General Liability and Insurance Services Office Form No. GL-0404 covering Board Form Comprehensive General Liability; or Insurance Services office Commercial General Liability coverage ("occurrence" Form No. CG-0001 ). Insurance Services Office Form No. CA-0001 (Ed. 1/78) coverir~g Automobile Liability, Code I "any auto" and Endorsement CA-0025. Workers' Compensation insurance as required by Labor Code of the State of California and Employers' Liability insurance. 4. Errors and Omissions insurance. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Contractor shall maintain limits of insurance no less than: -3- r:~cip%projects%pwg4-07~geotech.agrlajp General Liability: $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage. Automobile Liability: $1,000,000combined single limit per accident for bodily injury and property damage. Workers' Compensation and Employers' Liability: Workers' Compensation as required by the Labor Code of the State of California and Employers' Liability limits of $1,000,000 per accident. 4. Errors and Omissions Insurance: $1,000,000 per occurrence. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductible in excess of $1,000 must be declared to and approved by the City. Other Insurance Provisions. Insurance policies required by this contract shall contain or be endorsed to contain the following provisions: All Policies. Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, concealed by either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days prior written notice to the City via United States First Class Mall. General Liability and Automobile Liability Coveraaes. The City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Consultant; products and completed operations of the Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by the Consultant, or automobiles owned, lease, hired or borrowed by the Consultant. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers. With regard to claims arising from the Consultant's performance of the work described in this contract, the Consultant's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City its officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees or employees or volunteers shall apply in excess of, and not contribute with, the Consultant's insurance. : Any failure to comply with the reporting provisions of the policies shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its officers officials, employees or volunteers. The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. -4- r:%cip%projecte%pw94-O7\geotech.agrlajp Workers' Comoensation and Emolovers' Liability Coveraoe. The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers for losses arising from work performed by the Consultant for the City. Verification of Coveraae. Contractor shall furnish the City with certificates of insurance affecting coverage required by this clause. The certificates for each insurance policy are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on. its behalf. The certificates are to be on forms provided by the City and are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. The City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, at any time. Consultant shall include all subconsultants as insureds under its policieS. or shall furnish separate certificates for each subcontractor. All coverages for subcontractors shall be subject to all of the requirements stated herein. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City. At the option of the City, either: the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects the City, its officers, officials and employees; or the Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense expenses. 16. Licenses. Consultant and subconsultant shall obtain all necessary licenses, including but not limited to, City Business Licenses. The parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date and year above written. CONSULTANT CITY OF TEMECULA By: Jim Harrison By Ron Roberts, President Geotechnical & Environmental Engineers, Inc. -5- r:%cip%projects%pw94-O7~.geotech.agrlajp APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk -6- r:~cip~orojects~ow94-OT~geotech.egrlajp EXHIBIT "A" TASKS TO BE PERFORMED r:~cip~projects%pw94-O7%geotech.agr/ajp Mr. Dennis Armstrong City of Temecula May 4, 1995 Page 2 Based on this information, we propose the following scope of services for rough grading control and utility trench back~ll testing, concrete inspection and materials testing: SCOPE OF SERVICES ROUGH GRADING CONTROL Observation and Testing - Rough Grading (Full Time) · Senior Technician (120 hrs @ $50/hr) .......................... $6,000.00' · Field Supervisor (10 hrs @ $60/hr) ................ : ............ $600.00 · Engineering Geologic Inspection (4 hrs @ $80/kr) ................. $320.00 · Clerical (12 hrs @ $35/hr) ................................... $420.00 · Travel and Vehicle ...................................... No Charge Trench Baclr~ll Testing (Part Time - On Call) · Senior Technician (50 hn @ $50/hr) .......................... $2,500.00 Parking Area Subgrade and Base Testing · Senior Technician (6 hn @ $50/hr) ............................ $300.00 Footing Inspection · Staff Geologist (2 hrs @ $55/hr) ............................... $110.00 Casting Concrete Cylinders and Grout Prisms · Deputy Inspector (42 hours @ $55/hr) ......................... $2,310.90 Laboratory Testing · Maximum Density (4 tests @ $100 each) ........................ $400.00 · Compressire Strength Te-~ting · Concrete Cylinder 6X12 (188 @ $18) ..................... $3,384.00 · Grout Prism-~ (12) cutting not included ..................... $240.00 · Rebar Testing, Bend and Tensile (4 @$50 each) .................. $200.00 Final Compaction Report Preparation ...................... Lump Sum $1,850.00 Total $18,634 O0 ~ EXHIBIT "B" PAYMENT SCHEDULE r:~eip%projects~pwg4-O7%geotech.egrlajp Geotechnical & Environmental Engineers, ENVIRONMENTAL FEE SCHEDULE EFFECTIVE JANUARY, 1993 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Principal Engineer I Geologist I Hydrogeologist ........................................ $100.00 Per Hour Associate Engineer I Geologist I Hydrogeologist ....................................... $92.00 Per Hour Senior Engineer I Geologist I Hydrogeologist ........................................... $85.00 Per Hour Senior Ent4ronmental A~sessor ..................................................... $83.00 Per Hour Project Engineer I Geologist I Hydrogeologist .......................................... $70.00 Per Hour Project Environmental As3e=sor ..................................... : ............... $64.00 Per Hour Staff Engineer I Geologist I Hydrogeologist ............................................ $60.00 Per Hour Start En~ronmental Aue~sor ....................................................... $55.00 Per Hour Field Director .................................................................. $50.00 Per Hour Senior Technician ............................................................... $48.00 Per Hour Technician II ................................................................... $45.00 Per Hour Technician I ................................................................... $40.00 Per Hour Draftsperson ................................................................... $38.00 Per Hour Cletfcal ....................................................................... $38.00 Per Hour Pick-up and Delivery ............................................................. $24.00 Per Hour SPECIAL EQUIPMENT On-Site Vehicle Charges ........................................................... 64.00 Per Hour Field Groundwater Sampling Equipment ............................................... By arrangement Organic Vapor Meter ............................................................. $100.00 Per Day interlace Probe .................................................................. $60.e0 Per Day Other Environmental Equipment ..................................................... By arrangement Gadphysical Equipment ........................................................... By ~'rangement TERMS OF PAYMENT Invoices rendered for professional setv/ces arei due upon presentation. A service charge of 1.5 percent per month may be charged on accounts not paid within 30 days to cover additional processing and carrying costs. Any attomey's fees or other costs incurred in collecting any delinquent account will be paid by the client. An overtime charge of 33.3% of hourly rates will be added for time in exce~s of 8 hours per day (excluding travel) and time before 7:00 a.m. and alter 5 p.m. or on Saturdays. An overtime charge of 50% will be charged for time in excess of 12 hours per day and on Sundays or legal holidays. Charges for travel ]o or from project are free up to a maximum of 112 hour each way. All travel time in excess of 112 hour each way will be charged at straight time. 27431 Enterprise Circle West · Ternecula CA 92590 · TEL (909~ 676-8337 FAX (9C--91 676-4583 ITEM 4 APPROVAL RY~ CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFIC R CITY MANAGE COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: General Manager/Board of Directors Mary Jane McLarney, Assistant City Manager May 23, 1995 Consideration of Fee Reduction for Filming at the Community Recreation Center RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council consider a fee reduction for filming at the Community Recreation Center for Weekend in the Country, Inc. BACKGROUND: The Production Company, A Weekend in the Country Inc., arrived in Temecula on May 1, 1995 for the filming of their movie. They will be filming · portion of their movie at the Community Recreation Center on May 30 - June 2. According to the City'.s existing Resolution, the standard Facility Use Permit charges for "for profit" organizations would total $6,500. In consideration of the economic benefit to Temecula (see attached report), staff is recommending that the City Council reduce the fees to $1,000. The City will be receiving $2,100 in Transient Occupancy Tax, as well as the sales tax on the purchase of materials and supplies in the City of Temecula. To date, $427,025 has been spent in the Temecula area. It should also be noted that filming will be done during off hours between 7:00 p.m. to 5:00 e.m. In connection with the User Fee Study currently underway, we have requested the consultant to provide a separate fee schedule for filming at public facility for future Council consideration. Economi~ Impact Page 2 12. City, County & C-ovemment Pesmits 13. Personnel Costs (Police,Fire, P~c~ etc.) 14. LocalExtrasHired Number of People - 500 15. Local Drivers Hired: 16. Local Security Hifed 17. Daily per diem Number of Crew Paid - 70 18. Number of Days- various ~D ~D $30,0~ $13,162 · $ 9, 060 $ 78, 773 Other local hires: $ 87,750 (Carpenters, painters, .helicopter pilots, house cleaning service, craft service, etc.) 19. Production Services $14,165 20. Other rentals (furniture, tents, trash dumpsters, etc) $14,500 21. Other Purchases $ 24,115 - Tot~! Amount ,~p~nt.' ~ 497,09.5.00 (Actual figure will go higher) Days on Location: 32 days Pre-Producfion: 14 days, partial crew and 2 days, entire crew. Hease note: Except for Pah Mesa Resort, which is in San Diego County, all monies spent are in the City of Temecula and surrounding areas of Riverside County. -' Economic Impact Report (as of May 16, 1995) Production Company: Weekend In the Country Inc, Address: 2934 1/2 Beverly Glen Circle #318 Bel Air, CA 90077 Contact: Phone: Production Date: Production Title: Steven Hasson, Location Manager Production Office at Pala Mesa Resort: (619) 731-1238 April 28, 1995 - June 2, 1995 'Weekend In the Country' 1. Hotel Temecula Creek Inn Pala Mesa Resort* Embassy Suites/Best Western/Comfort Inn Car Rental LocalAirfare Catering and other food items Most/Produce bou~ army in Temamls by production cmerer to feed 60-80 people (breakfast and lunch) $ 25,000 $ 70,000' $ 2,000 s 2,ooo None $ 35,000 Fruit/naeis/'t~-w=age and second meal food bought daily in Temecula by production craft services to feed 60-80 people (on going food and beverage service for cast and crew) 5. Hardware and lumber supplies $ 2,500 6. Flowers and Plants $ 4,500 7. Secretarial personnel, photocopying, etc. $ 11,500 8. Local Wardrobe purchased $ 5,000 9. Dry Cleaning/Laundry $ 5,000 10. Gasoline for 14 production vehicles and 25 crew cars $ 20,000 11. Location fees (Public and Private ) $ 43,000 DEPARTMENTAL REPORT CITY ATTOR~;~'ROV~ CITY OF TEMECULA AOENDA REPORT TO: Board of Directors FROM: Ronald E. Bradley, General Manager DATE: May 23, 1995 SUBJECT: Departmental Report PREPARED BY: ~;;~Shawn D. Nelson, Director of. Community Services The Parkview Site Project is divided into two (2) phases: the first phase is the construction of the permanent fire station on Pauba Road west of Margarita Road, and the second phase is the small retention pond adjacent to the CRC, east of the existing desiltation pond at the Rancho California Sports Park. Staff anticipates bidding the first phase by mid-August, 1995 and the second phase prior to the end of this fiscal year. The City Council awarded the design contract for the Margarita Park Master Plan to The Alhambra Group on February 14, 1995. Staff has established a project committee comprised of City Council members, Commissioners, interested members of the public, the Temecula Valley Unified School District, sports organizations, and staff. The site is a 20 acre parcel on Margarita Road west of Moraga and adjacent to the Temecula Elementary School. The first project committee meeting was held on April 18, 1995. A second meeting with the Project Committee has been scheduled for May 30, 1995 at Temecula Elementary School. The plans for the sports field lighting project at Temecula Middle School have been submitted by the designer to the Department of State Architect. The project will provide lighting for two baseball diamonds, a soccer overlay, the track, and the football field. Staff anticipates the project will be completed and ready for use by Pop Warner by September 1, 1995. Pale Community Park construction is completed and is currently under a ninety (90) day maintenance period. The park is tentatively scheduled to be open to the pubic in September, 1995. The park improvements include a restroom/snack bar, parking, tennis courts, basketball courts, soccer field, landscaping, and irrigation. The Rancho California Sports Park Improvement Project will begin construction in June, 1995. Development of the 10 acre site will complete the improvements to the northeast corner of the park at Rancho Vista and Margarita Roads. The improvements will include parking, picnic facilities, a roller hockey rink, a skate board facility, restroom/concession building, landscaping and irrigation system. It is anticipated that the project will be completed in April, 1996. Plans for the Sam Hicks Monument Park Project have been submitted to the Economic Development Agency to ensure compliance with CDBG requirements. Staff plans on bidding the park project in May, 1995. Also, the Temecula Valley Museum has received approved plans for the renovation to St Catherine's Church and has awarded a bid for construction. The church renovation project should begin in June, 1995, and the park project should begin construction in August, 1995. The Planning Commission has also approved the plot plan for the new museum facility to be constructed at Sam Hicks Monument Park. The Public Works Department will be working with TCSD and the Museum to ensure coordination between construction efforts on this project. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ITEM 1 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY TUESDAY, MAY 9, 1995 A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency was called to order at 8:33 PM at the Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. Chairperson Ronald J. Parks presiding. PRESENT: 5 AGENCY MEMBERS: Lindemans, Muftoz, Roberts, Stone, Parks ABSENT: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None Also present were Executive Director Ronald E. Bradley, General Counsel Peter Thorson and City Clerk June S. Greek. PUBLIC COMMENTS Bonnie Corbin, 28690 Mercedies St., Temecula, requested assistance from the Agency in reaching Mr. Zev Buffman regarding property she owns in Old Town. Agency Member Muf~oz gave her · number for Mr. Buffman end stated he would further assist her if she has trouble getting through. CONSENT CALENDAR Agency Member Lindemans stated he would abstain on Item 1.2 since he was not present at that meeting. It was moved by Agency Member Stone, seconded by Agency Member Roberts to approve Consent Calendar No. 1, with Agency Member Lindemans abstaining on Item 1.2. The motion carried as follows: AYES: 5 AGENCY MEMBERS: Lindemans, Mur~oz, Roberts, Stone, Parks NOES: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None I Minutes 1.1 Approve the minutes of April 11, 1995; 1.2 Approve the minutes of April 19, 1995, (Agency Member Lindemans abstained;) Minutee.rda%050995 -1 - 1.3 Approve the minutes of April 25, 1995. AGENCY BUSINESS 2 Consideration of Soonsorshio for All Women's Rodeo Assistant City Manager Mary Jane McLarney presented the staff report. George Buhler, 40265 Paseo Sereno, spoke in opposition to the sponsorship. Agency Member Stone stated he is not in favor of this funding based on the fact this is a for-profit organization and it is not being held within the City limits. It was moved by Agency Member Stone, seconded by Agency Member Lindemans to deny the funding request. The motion was unanimously carried. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT None given. AGENCY MEMBER'S REPORTS Chairperson Parks stated he has received a request from the Cancer Society to allow a street name to be raffled as a fund raiser and asked if staff has anything to report. City Clerk June Greek reported that a verbal request has been received and Chief Building Official Tony Elmo is working on a report. She clarified that no formal request has been received. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Agency Member Stone, seconded by Agency Member Roberts to adjourn at 8:43 PM to a meeting on May 23, 1995, 8:00 PM, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. The motion was unanimously carried. Ronald J. Parks, Chairperson ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk/Agency Secretary Minutes.rds~050995 -2- ITEM 2 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL ~~-- C.J,TY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICE CITY MANAGER REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA REPORT Redevelopment Agency Members Ronald E. Bradley, Executive Director May 23, 1995 Temecula Shuttle Project RECOMMENDATION: That the Redevelopment Agency approve: (1) The execution of a lease of City-owned property at Front and Sixth Streets (APN #922- 023-020)to Ed and Kathleen Dool under terms and conditions described in Attachment A in a form acceptable to the Executive Director and Agency Attorney; (2) An RDA Rehabilitation Loan of e 100,O00for the construction of the Temecula Shuttle project under the terms described in Attachment B; (3) The appropriation of $97,423.76 for the purchase of property located at 41953 Main Street, Temecula, California (APN #922-034-0291 )in accordance with Redevelopment Agency action of December 20, 1994. (Attachment C). STAFF REPORT: On November 15, 1994, the Redevelopment Agency was asked to consider approval of an RDA commercial rehabilitation loan to Ed and Kathleen Dool, d.b.a. Dual Development, Inc. The application pertained to a site located at 41953 Main Street on which Dual Development proposed to build their Temecula Shuttle project and supporting retail/office uses. On November 15, the RDA directed that discussions be held between Redevelopment Agen~:y staff, representatives of Dual Development, and T.Z.B.G., Inc. with respect to the compatibility of the proposed Main Street Project with the planned Old Town Entertainment Project. As a result of those discussions, the matter was returned to the Redevelopment Agency on December 20, 1994 at which time the Redevelopment Agency authorized transferring the Temecula Shuttle project to s City-owned site at Sixth and Front Streets and the purchase of the Main Street site from Ed and Kathleen Dool. At that time, the RDA approved ~93,651 from the RDA CIP Fund 280 for the purchase and related costs of the Main Street site. Agenda Report Temecule Shuttle Project Page 2 In accordance with the December 20, 1994 RDA action, Redevelopment Agency staff have negotiated a lease of City-owned property for purposes of constructing the Temecula Shuttle project. Lease terms were discussed in · Closed Session on April 25, 1995 at which time, the Executive Director was authorized to negotiate a lease with the terms described in Attachment B. The property to be leased is currently owned by the City but is proposed to be transferred to the RDA prior to execution of a lease with Temecula Shuttle, The City's General Fund will be reimbursed by the RDA for all costs incurred as a result of the purchase of the site, The purchase and reimbursement will require a separate action of the RDA and City Council which.' will be docketed following RDA action on this matter, An appropriation of $97,423.76is necessary to fund the purchase of the Main Street property under terms previously approved. This amount represents a $3,762.80 increase in the originally agreed upon purchase price due to the time which has elapsed between the initial approval and reaching agreement on lease terms. During this period, Ed and Kathleen Dool have incurred expenses for the property which under the terms of the purchase agreement with the RDA must be reimbursed. FISCAL IMPACT: Funds are available in the RDA Smell Business Loan Account sufficient to fund the commercial rehabilitation loan for Dual Development, Inc. in the amount of $100,000. The purchase was approved on December 20, 1994 in the amount of ~93,661 representing the actual documented purchase price and closing costs of the 41953 Main Street property of $85,660.96 and other costs associated with the purchase not to exceed $8,000. An appropriation in the amount of ~97,423.76 is required to fund this project. Attachments A - Proposed Lease Terms B - Terms and Conditions for Temecula Shuttle Small Business Loan C - Estimated Settlement Statement for Ed Dool ATTACHMENT A PROPOSED LEASE TERMS SIXTH/FRONT CITY-OWNED SITE APN #922-023-020 April 25, 1995 Development Proposal: Recommended Lease Term: Recommended Lease Rate: Recommended Lease Terms: Additional Lease Requirements: Temecula Shuttle proposes to build up to 3,600 square feet of space on approximately 12,000 square feet of property with Front Street frontage. The development will include: Temecula Shuttle offices/lobby/ticket windows, day lockers, picnic/snack- area, tour coach/wine tour operations loading/discharge area and rental office space. The first 1,800 square feet of the project will require a minimum of 14 parking spaces which would be developed on the leased site. Additional required parking spaces, will be supplied by means of a contribution by Temecula Shuttle to the City parking district in the amount of the actual cost of City land and construction per space. Thirty year initial term; 3 five year options. 10% of market value ($10.50 per sq. ft.), escalated by 8% every five years. Revised by appraisal to new market value at year twenty. Escalate 10% each succeeding five year period after year 20. Initial rent for 1,200 square feet @ $1,050 monthly. Lease rate is 50% ($525) for construction period; raised to full rate at certificate of occupancy. Rental accrued and deferred for six months after completion. Deferred rent paid over the succeeding three year period. Deferred rent accrues interest at same rate as City Small Business Loan. Lease to restrict uses to those operated by Temecula Shuttle described above. Any sublease, or change of use will require RDA approval and a reassessment of fair market value based on the new uses proposed. ATTACHMENT B TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR TEMECULA SHUTTLE SMALL BUSINESS LOAN LOCATION: FACILITY: LOAN AMOUNT: TERMS: INTEREST RATE: SECURITY: City-owned Site at Sixth and Front Streets APN #922-230-020 Temecula Shuttle Offices/lobby/ticket windows, day lockers, picnic/snack area, tour coach/wine tour loading/discharge area and rental office space. 8100,000 20 year amortization due and payable in 5 years. Six month payment deferrel during construction. Interest to accrue, but payments would not begin until 6 months from date of note or upon issuance of s Certificate of Occupancy - whichever occurs first. 10,250% which represents the current Federal Index Rate (5.250%) plus 5.000%. The rate will be adjusted to Prime if the stipulated judgment scheduled to be heard on August 7 is approved. (Note: Due to the usuary rate laws in the State of California the maximum rate that may be charged by a lender not defined as a mortgage banker, mortgage broker, bank or savings and loan is 10.000% or the current Federal Index Rate plus 5,000%) All new equipment purchased will be collateralized via a UCC filing end a lien will be placed on the improvements to be constructed on the leased land. The Lease Agreement for this property and the Loan Security Agreement will be cross referenced. In the case of a default on the lease, the loan would become due and payable. In the case of a default on the loan, the lease would be terminated. ATTACH MENT C ESTIMATED SETTLEMENT STATEMENT FOR ED DOOL MAIN STREET PROPERTY APN 922-034-0291 ' Amount Amount Description Fee Approved ' Not Approved Total Payoff "- Interest ~ 9.00% from 4/22 through 5~25 Reimbursement to Ed Dooh Down Payment Closing Fees 5 months interest only payments ~) t555.00 Appraisal on Wilminton Property Architechural Renderings Consulting Fees Financial Consultant Book Keeper 174,000.00 t620.50 174,000.00 tl 1,000.00 111,000.00 1660.96 '1660.96 12,775.00 12,775.00 t2,600.00 t2,600.00 t 1,030.00 11,030.00 tl ,912.50 tl ,595.00 t963.30 t175.00 t620.50 t317.50 t963.30 1175.00 Closing Fees: Title Policy Sub Escrow Fee Transfer Tax Grant Deed Reconveyance Escrow Fee Document Preparation Fee Padding Total Fees t448.00 1100.00 t93.50 t20.00 130.00 1640.00 1155.00 t200.00 197,423.76 193,660.96 t448.00 1100.00 t93.50 t20.00 t30.00 1640.00 tl 56.00 t200.00 - 13,762.80