HomeMy WebLinkAbout021396 CC AgendaIn compliance with the Americans with Debilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in
this meeting, I~ase contact the office of the City Clerk (909) 694-6444. Nuilflcation 48 hours Ixior
meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104ADA Tie II]
ARFNDA
TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
A REGULAR MEETING
COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER.
30875 RANCHO VISTA ROAD
FEBRUARY 13, 1996- 7:00 PM
§ 54956.9|a), Vance Cornoration v. 'CITY of Temec, a,.
§ 54956.9(b|. two matters of potendd Btiged0~.."
5:30 PM -. Closed Sosdon of the City Councfi/Redevelopment Agency pursuant to Govemment
Coda Sections: .. .' ' '.' .~.. ~.~..::':". '.;., "'~.',~i.:~'' '.:.~. '~' ..':'.~':~.~:...,'
· , ,.v ,~. ~./ :... .~. , :',. ....,. ,,'.":'.. ..
(922-054-003) and 28555Pujd Street |9224)54-006); Negotiating Perde~john~Fm~ta.;' ',~ '.
Cande Cebal!ol and the Rede~dopment Agency' Of 'the' CIty .ef Tenteddie; ,U~ 'negotiation:'.. · ~
p.c. andterm ' ': · ...' .' :.' ... ,L:.'
· .. .~ ' , ..... ,:~ · ... ",.,,, :'>.., ~' · , ,~ '~ ~,,~ ,"':.',,.: ::., ·
Avenue;' Negotiating Pardes: Jan We:'lert'.RV; Norm Reeves 'Super 'GrOUp'and ti~'.: :,: .~.'.:.~.i"~: ~'. ".:",
Redevelopment Agency of the CIty'0f TemecUla; ,Under negotiation':; conddei;atimt"~;leae ·
proposals. . : ' ' :'. :". ' :' :':'.' ...."', ~."' · :: './.~ :"": '~'; ,:
· . . , , .. , ' .~ ~/~ ~ ·
§ 54956.9(a), Claim of 0rico ~nSurance on Behalf of brsn Orteia."":' ' ' ....."" '.'.'.'"
;..'.~,':'.~.'
..,~ ,..:., ., , ;~ ..'
.. .. . · .... .. ,, ',;:. · . '....
,'
.'.~..
· . , .' .
./ · ,
At approximately 9:45 PM, the City Council will determine which of the remaining
agenda items can be considered and acted upon prior to .1 0:0OPM and may
continue all other items on which additional time is required until a future meeting.
All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 PM.
CALL TO ORDER:
Invocation:
Mayor Karel Lindemans presiding
Pastor George Simmons, House of Praise
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. 96-03
Resolution: No. 96-10
Rag Salute:
Councilmember Stone
ROLL CALL:
Birdsall, Roberrs, Stone, Lindemans
PRESENTATIONS/ Oath of Office - Councilmember Ford
PROCLAMATIONS Certificate of Appreciation '- Planning Commission Service - Steve Ford
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 30 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Council on
items that are not listed on the Agenda or are listed on the Consent Calendar. Speakers
are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council on an item not
listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink 'Request to Speak' form should
be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other agenda items a 'Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk
before the Council gets to that item. There is e five (5) minute time limit for individual
speakers.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the sgenda will be made at
this time. A total, not to exceed, ten (10) minutes will. be devoted to these reports.
CONSENT CALENDAR
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
NI matters fisted under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be
enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless members
of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for
separate action.
Standard Ordinance Adootion Procedure .
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in
the agenda.
see 2
2
4
5
6
Aooroval of Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve the minutes of January 23, 1996.
Resolution Aooroving Iist of Demands
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION N0. 96..01
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING
CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
City Treasurer's Reoort
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Receive and file the City Treasurer's Report as of December 31, 1995.
Records Destruction ADoroyal
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 Approve scheduled destruction of certain records as provided under the City of
Temecula approved Records Retention Policy.
Prooertv Insurance Coverage
RECOMMENDATION: '
6.1 Approve the City of Temecula's property' insurance policy renewal with Reliance
Insurance Company, Hartford Steam Boiler, and Pacific Insurance Company,
LtdJAgricultural Insurance for the period of February 26, 1996 through February
26, 1997 in the amount of ~73,260;
6.2 Appropriate $26,600 from the Insurance Internal Service Fund Retained Earnings to
the Property Insurance Account.
&.Weend~0213N
7
Direction on Pending Council Reauest
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1 Direct staff to discontinue development of a tree ordinance.
8
9
Out-of-State Travel
RECOMMENDATION:
8.1 Authorize certain out-of-state travel plans.
Resolution Finding Benefit to the Community from the Statewide School Facilities General
Obliaation Bond
RECOMMENDATION:
9.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 96-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA FINDING
SUBSTANTIAL BENEFIT TO THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY FROM THE STATEWIDE
SCHOOL FACILITIES GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND
10
Release Faithful Performance Warranty, Labor and Material. and Monument Bonds in Tract
No. 20703-1 (Located easterly of intersection of Roripaugh Road at Winchester Road)
RECOMMENDATION:
10.1
10.2
Authorize the release of Faithful Performance Warranty and Labor and Material
bonds for Street, Water and Sewer Improvements, and Subdivision Monumantation
bonds in Tract No. 20703-1;
Direct'the City Clerk to so advise. the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, the
developer and surety.
IL'V~endaV)213N 4
11
Acceot Public Imorovements in Tract No. ~0703-~
(Located easterly of intersection of Roripaugh Road at Winchester Road)
RECOMMENDATION:
11.1 Accept the Public Improvements in Tract No. 20703-2;
11.2 Authorize the reduction in Faithful Performance Street, Drainage and Water and
Sewer Bond amounts and the release of the Subdivision Monumectation Bond;
11,3 Accept the Faithful Performance Warranty Bond Riders and approve the subdivision
agreement rider;
11.4 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, the
developer and surety.
12
'13
Release the Public Improvement Warranty. Labor and Material and Monument Bonds in
Tract No. 22786 (Located southwesterly of intersection of Nicdas Road at North General
Kearny Road)
RECOMMENDATION:
12.1 Authorize the release of the Subdivision Monumentation, Faithful Performance
Warranty, and Labor and. Material Bonds, in Tract No. 22786;
12.2 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, Surety and
Developer.
ACCePt Public Imorovements in Tract No. ~3126
(Located southerly of Intersection of Nicolas Road at Roripaugh Road)
RECOMMENDATION:
13.1 Accept the Public Improvements in Tract No. 23126;
13.2 Authorize the reduction in Faithful Performance Street, Drainage, and Water and
Sewer Bond amounts and the release of the Subdivision Monumentation Bond;
13.3 Accept the Faithful Performance Warranty Bond Riders and approve the subdivision
agreement rider;
13.4 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, the
developer and surety.
14
15
Acceotance of Public Streets into the City-Maintained Street System (Within Tracts No.
19939~1. ~ and F) (Located northwesterly of intersection of Pala Road at Via Eduardo)
RECOMMENDATION:
14.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 96-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, ..
CAUFORNIA, ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY-
MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM {WITHIN TRACTS NO. 19939-1,2 AND F)
Acceptance of Public Streets into the City-Maintained Street System (Within Tracts No.
20703-2. and 23126) (Located southeasterly of intersection of Winchester Road at
Roripaugh Road)
15.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 96-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITYo
MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACTS NO. 20703-2 AND 23126)
16
Acceptance of Public Streets into the City-Maintained Street System (Within Tracts No.
20703-1 and 22786) (Located southwesterly of the intersection of Nicolas Road at North
General Kearny Road)
RECOMMENDATION:
16.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 96-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY-
MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACTS NO 20703-1 AND 22786)
R:V~eemk~21286 e
17
Acceotance of Public Streets into the City-Maintained Street System (Within Tract No.
22208) (Located northeasterly of Margarita Road at Solarm Way)
RECOMMENDATION:
18
19
17.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION N0. 96-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY-
MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACT NO 22208)
Award a Contract to Remove and Replace Concrete and A.C. on Co0~merce 'Center Drive.
Public Works Maintenance - Project No. PW95-96-17
RECOMMENDATION:
18.1 Award a contract to Maples and Associates to remove and replace concrete and
'A.C. on Commerce Center Drive, 200 feet south of Enterprise Circle West at the
channel.
ComDletion and AcceDtance of the Construction of FY95-96 Citywide P.C.C. Repairs.
Project No. PW95-~1
RECOMMENDATION:
19.1 Accept the Construction of FY95-96 Citywide P.C.C. Repairs, Project No. PW95-21;
19.2 File Notice of completion, release the Performance bond, and accept a one (1) year
Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract;
19.3 Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after filing of the Notice of
Completion if no liens have been filed.
20
Sewer Facilities Agreement with Eastern Municioal Water District for Relocation of Sanitary
Sewer for Winchester Road at Interstate Route 15. Bridee Widening and Northbound Ramo
Improvements. Project No. PW94-21
RECOMMENDATION:
20.1 Approve the Interagency Agreement and Bill of Sale, and authorize the Mayor to
execute both documents.
20.2 Authorize payment to the Eastern Municipal Water District for engineering,
inspection and testing fees in the amount of 63,940.00. .
II.'~ewU~O2IIN 7
21
Sewer Facilities and Service Aareement with Eastern Municipal Water District for
Construction of a Sanitary Sewer in Pauba Ropd for the Parkview Site Imorovement Project
- Phase I. Fire Station No. 84. Project No. PW95-09
RECOMMENDATION:
21.1 Approve the Interagency Agreement and Bill of Sale, and authorize the Mayor to
execute both documents;.
21.2 Authorize payment to the Eastern Municipal Water District for engineering,
inspection and testing fees in the amount of $7,655.00.
22
23
24
Award of Contract for the FY94-95 Annual Pavement Management Project. Proiect No.
PW95-06
RECOMMENDATION:
22.1
Award a contract for the construction of the FY94-95 Annual Pavement
Management Project, Project No; PW95-06 to Ciovis Paving and Sealing, Inc., for
$653,929.15 and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract.
22.2, Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the
contingency amount of $65,392.92 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount.
Second Amendment to Employment Systems. Inc. Aareement to Provide Insecti0n
services for the Winchester Interchanae Project No. PW94-21
RECOMMENDATION:
23.1 Approve the Second Amendment to Employment Systems, Inc. Agreement to
provide Inspector Services for the Winchester Interchange Project No. PW94-21.
Proposed Detour for Winchester Road Construction - Margarita Road to Murrieta Hot
Sorinos Road (Area 1 )
RECOMMENDATION:
24.1 Request approval from Caltrans the proposed detour' plan (Alternative #2), to
facilitate the safe and timely construction of Winchester Road (Area 1 ).
25
26
Award of Bid for Reolacement Cornouter Workstations
RECOMMENDATION:
25.1 Award a bid for the purchase of the replacement computer workstations for City
Hall, Bid Number 96-01 to Gdden State Trading Company for $205,608,55;
25.2 Approve an Operating Transfer from the General Fund to the Information Services
Internal Services Fund in the amount of $200,000,
Amendment to Lease Aareement
RECOMMENDATION:
26.1 Approve an amendment to the Real Proparty Lease Agreement between the
Temecula Town Association and the City of Temecula regarding the operation and
maintenance of Rotary Park,
RECESS CITY COUNCIL M,R;'rlNG FOR TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVIC;S DISTRICT MEETING,
T;MECULA RED;V;LOPMI:NT MI:PTINn,
OLD TOWN/WPSTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITI;S DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY MI:E'I'ING
OLD TOWN/WFSTSIDI: IMPROVPMENT AUTHORITY
R.'V~eend~021 N ·
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICFS DISTRICT MEETING
Next ,~ Order:
Ordinance: No. CSD 96-01
Resolution: No. CSD 96-01
CALL TO ORDER: President Ron Roberrs
ROLL CALL: DIRECTORS: Birdsall, Ford, Lindemans, Stone, Roberrs
PUBLIC COMMENT:
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Board of
Directors on items that are not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers
are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Board of Directors on an
item ngt listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak'
form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak' form must be filed with the City Clerk
before the Board of Directors gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for
individual speakers.
Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors, should present a completed pink 'Request to
Speak' to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your
name and address for the record.
CONSENT CALENDAR
I Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of January 9, 1996.
2
Fence Installation Contract - Temecula Duck Pond
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Award contract of $22,985 to Rancho Recycled Products for the installation of
1783 linear feet of white, two-rail trail fencing at the Temacula Duck Pond.
R.~gete~o2131e 10
3
Release of Iabor and Materials Bond for Voorburo Park - Nicolas Road and North General
Kearnv Road
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1
Authorize the City Clerk to release the Parkland/Landscape Labor and Materials
Bond for the construction of Voorburg Park - Van Daele Development Corporation.
GENERAL MANAGERS REPORT- Bradley
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT - Nelson
BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT: Next meeting: February. 27, 1996, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center,
30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California.
~V~eendlRO213M 11
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. RDA 96-01
** Resolution: No. RDA 96-01
CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Patricia H. Birdsall presiding
ROLL CALL:
AGENCY MEMBERS: Ford, Lindemans, Roberrs, Stone~ Birdsall
PUBLIC COMMENT:
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Redevelopment
Agency on items that are not listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar. SHakers
are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Agency on an item not
listed on the Agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should
be filled out end filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other agenda items a 'Request to Speak' form must be filed with the City Clerk
before the Agency gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual
speakers.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of January 23, 1996.
AGENCY BUSINESS
2 Temdcula O.N.E. Operation Neighborhood Enrichment
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Receive and file report.
&'Veend.~021306 12
3
Rancho West Aoartments Proposed Tax-Exempt Financino
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
4
3.2
3.3
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 96-
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
RELATING TO THE ISSUANCE OF BONDS FOR THE PURPOSE OF FINANCING THE
ACQUISITION BY THE COACHELLA VALLEY HOUSING COALITION OF A MULTI-
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL RENTAL PROJECT AND RELATED FACILITIES
Appoint Jones, Hall, Hill and White as Bond Counsel for the issue;
Direct staff to prepare documents acceptable to the Executive Director,
Redevelopment Agency Attorney, and Bond Counsel to effectuate the sale of bonds
to finance the purchase of the Rancho West Apartments.
Comparison of Current Loan Proarams
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Review the Redevelopment-Agency Loan Program and criteria and provide direction
to staff concerning the program,
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
AGENCY MEMBER'S REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: February 27, 1996, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875
Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California.
R:%~gendl~O213H 13
OLD TOWN WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY ..'
CALL TO ORDER:
ROLL CALL:
PUBLIC COMMENTS
President Patricia H. Birdsall
Ford, Lindemans, Roberrs, Stone, Birdsall
Resolution No.:
Next in Order:
No. FA 95-06
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Council on
items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If
you desire to speak to the Council about an item not; listed on the Agenda a pink "Request
To Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address.
CONSENT CALENDAR
I Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of January 9, 1996.
AUTHORITY BUSINESS
2 FinancinQs for Old Town Area Public Imorovements and the Western Bvoass Corridor
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. FA 96-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY AMENDING
RESOLUTIONS OF INTENTION FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. I (OLD
TOWN AREA PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS) TO INCLUDE ADDITIONAL LAND WITHIN
THE PROPOSED DISTRICT, AUTHORIZE THE FINANCING OF ADDITIONAL
IMPROVEMENTS, APPROVE A REVISED RATE AND METHOD OF
APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAXES, AND INCREASE THE AUTHORIZED
BONDED INDEBTEDNESS OF THE DISTRICT
R:~4~nda%O2139e 14
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: February 27, 1996, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875
Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California.
fl
R:%Agef'da~21396 16
CALL TO ORDilb r, aV~L,~ Patdcia H. Birdsall
PUBUC cxxeaim'r8
A totel of15 minutee is provided so members of the public can addre~ the Council on
item-that ere not Illted on the Agede. Speekes are limited to two (2) minut~ each. If
youdeiretolpeakto~C~e~enitemOgl;IbtedontheAgende apink"Reque~t
To lieelk" form dte. dd be fled out and filed' with the City Clerk.
When you are cadled to speak, please come forwad 8nd .-irate vg' ' ~ =rid addl:lll,'
RECOk~,;NDATION:
1.1' Approve the ms of JarKmry 9, 1996.
Next~ 'roering: February 27, 1996, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875
Viitilted, Tbt. I.C'al, Calif0rfde.
11
RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Any person may submit wdtten comments to the City Council before a public
hearing or may appear and be beard in suppert of or in opposition to the approval of
the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court,
you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the
public headng or in written correspondences delivered to the City Clerk at, or pdor
to, the public headng.
27
Plannino Aoolication No. PA95-O113 - Deletion of Conditions of Aooroval and Release of
Bonds for Parcel Mao 23969 (Located on the southerly side of Ridge Park Drive,
approximately 1,200 feet southerly of Rancho California Road)
RECOMMENDATION:
27.1 Adopt a resolution emitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 96-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 95-0113 TO DELETE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
FOR PARCEL MAP 23969 KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 940-310-044,
045, 046, 047 AND 048
27.2 Delete Conditions of Approval No. 21,22 and 23 for Parcel Map No. 23969;
27.3 Release Bond No. 177 40 76 for Labor and Materials and Faithful Performance;
27.4 Release Bond No. 117 40 78 for Subdivision Warranty.
28
Plannina Aoolication No. PA95-0133, Zonina Amendmen~ & Plannino Aoolication No.
PA95-0134. General Plan Amendment
RECOMMENDATION:
28.1 Adopt a resolution emitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 96-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF PLANNING APPLICATION N0. PA95-(:)134,
CHANGING THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM COMMUNITY
COMMERCIAL TO SERVICE COMMERCIAL ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE
EASTERLY SIDE OF YNEZ ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 270 FEET NORTH OF SOLANA
WAY AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 921-680-007
R:~aeende~O21398 17
28.2
Read by title only end introduce an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 96-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA95-0133, ZONING AMENDMENT, CHANGING
THE ZONING DESIGNATION FROM COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL TO SERVICE
COMMERCIAL ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE EASTERLY SIDE OF YNEZ ROAD,
APPROXIMATELY 270 FEET NORTHERLY OF SOLANA WAY AND KNOWN AS
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 921-680-007
28.3 Adopt the Negative Declaration for Planning Application No. PA95-0133, Zoning
Amendment and Planning Application No. PA95-0134, General Plan Amendment.
COUNCIL BUSINESS
29 Interim Planning Aoolication Fees
RECOMMENDATION:
29.1 Adopt · resolution entitled:
3O
RESOLUTION NO. 96-
A-RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING
INTERIM PLANNING APPLICATION FEES
Review and ADoroyal of the 22nd Year Community Develooment Block Grant Aoolications
for FY 1996-97
RECOMMENDATION:
30.1 Review the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding recommendations
submitted by the Finance Committee, and provide final recommendations to be
forwarded to the Riverside County Economic Development Agency (EDA) for
consideration.
11
31
32
Temecula Valley In-Line Hockev Association Reauest
RECOMMENDATION:
31.1
Consider a request from the Temecula Valley In-Une Hockey Association to provide
a matching grant for every 81.00 raised and in-kind services provided not to exceed
832,500 from General Fund Reserves.
31.2 Appropriate 832,500 to the Community Services Funding account from General
Fund Reserves.
Direction of the Development of a Sion Ordinance Committee
RECOMMENDATION:
32.1 Consider Option 1, the creation of · sign ordinance committee to help staff in
developing a locally appropriate sign ordinance.
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: February 27, 1996, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875
Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California.
ITEM 1
ITEM 2
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
HELD JANUARY 23, 1996
A regular meeting of the Temecula City Council was called to order at 7:03 PM at the
Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Street, Temecula, California. Mayor Karel
F. Lindemans presiding.
PRESENT 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Parks,
Roberts, Stone
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Also present were City Manager Ronald Bradley, City Attorney Peter M. Thorson, and City
Clerk June S. Greek.
EXECUTIVE SESSION
A meeting of the City of Temecula City Council was called to order at 5:37 PM. It was
moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Stone to adjourn to Executive
Session pursuant to Government Code Sections: §54956.8- Conference with Real Property
negotiator regarding property located at 27500 Jefferson Avenue: Negotiating Parties - Jan
Weilert RV, Norm Reeves Super Group and the city of Temecula: Under negotiation:
consideration of lease proposals.
2. Government Code § 54956.8- Conference with real property negotiator regarding property
located at 28816 Pujol Street: Negotiating Parties - Temecula Town Association and the City
of Temecula, Under Negotiation: consideration of acquisition agreement.
3. Government Code §54956.8- Conference with real property negotiator regarding the
property located east of Margarita Road, directly North of the Winchester Creek Development,
Negotiating parties: Stephen A. Bieri Company and the City of Temecula, Under Negotiation:
consideration of acquisition agreement.
4. Government Code §54956.9(b), one matter of potential litigation.
The motion was unanimously carried.
INVOCATION
The invocation was given by Sofia Sadler, Harvester Church of Temecula.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The audience was led in the flag salute by Councilmember Stone.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Sam Pratt, 40470 Brixton Cove, voiced objections to holding the Special Election to fill the
unexpired term of Ronald J. Parks on November 5, 1996, stating the election should be held
on Tuesday, June 4, 1996.
Minutes%1%23%96 -1 - 01/30/96
CiW Council Minutes January 23. 1996
City Attorney Thorson responded that it is his opinion, pursuant to Election Code Section
10229 3(d) and Government Code Section 36512(c), the next possible election dates to hold
an election are November 1996 or November 1997. He explained that there is not an election
scheduled throughout the City of Temecula on the June date, since the primaries have been
changed to March 26, 1996.
Councilmember Stone objected to Mr. Pratt's comments and stated the Council is doing
everything possible to 'provide for an election as soon as possible.
Mayor Lindemans requested a letter be sent to Mr. Pratt explaining the City's position
regarding the special election date.
Councilmember Roberts stated Mr. Pratt's statement that the City knew in October that Mr.
Parks was planning to resign was incorrect.
Thomas Stultz, 32076 Corte Soledad, objected to the Old Town Specific Plan Amendment
approved by the Council at the public hearing on January 9, 1996.
Cynthia Arocha, 44535 Bedford Court, asked for a status report regarding a traffic signal at
Bedford Court and 79 South. Public Works Director Joe Kicak reported this item will be
discussed at the Public/Traffic Safety Commission Meeting of February 22, 1996, where
recommendations regarding priorities will be made.
Barbara Zera, 39657 June Court, thanked the Council for the excellent job they are doing and
presented them a banner expressing appreciation signed by a number of citizens.
Wayne Hall, 42131 Agena, thanked the City Council and City staff for the outstanding service
they provide to the community.
Timothy J. Miller, 45052 Corte Bella Donna, thanked the City Council and staff for
outstanding accomplishments they have made since incorporation.
Wesley Scott, 30006 Mira Loma, addressed the Council regarding the donation of yellow
tulips, suggesting they be planted on Rancho Vista Road as an entry to the Community
Recreation Center.
CITY ATTORNEY REPORT
City Attorney Thorson announced, under the provisions of the Brown Act, there was nothing
to report regarding the discussions held during closed session.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Councilmember Stone stated he was presented a petition containing 100 signatures in support
of the City assisting the Temecula Valley Hockey Association with building a facility on the
Minutes%1%23%96 -2- O1/30/96
City Council Minutes January 23, 1996
Temecula Town Association property on Pujol Street. He requested this be agendized for
further discussion.
Councilmember Stone also requested staff look at the traffic back-ups created by stop signs
on 79S, to see if something can be done to alleviate this problem.
Councilmember Birdsall thanked the citizens who spoke in support of the City council.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Councilmember Birdsall requested the removal of Item No. 6 from the Consent Calendar.
Councilmember Stone stated he would abstain on Item No. 19 and 19a.
It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Stone to approve
Consent Calendar Items 1-5 and 7-19a. The motion was unanimously carried with
Councilmember Stone abstaining on Items No. 19 end 19a. The motion was unanimously
carried.
Standard Ordinance Adootion Procedure
1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions
included in the agenda.
Aooroval of Minutes
2.1 Approve the minutes of January 9, 1996.
Resolution Aoorovinq List of Demands
3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 96- 05
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
Minutee%1%23%96 -3- 01/30/96
City Council Minutes January 23. 1996
CombininQ Balance Sheets as of September 30, 1995 and the Statement of Revenues,
Expenditures and ChanQes in Fund Balance, and the Statement of Revenues, Exoenses
and ChanQes in Retained EarninQs for the Three Months Ended September 30, 1995
4.1
Receive and file the Combining Balance Sheets as of September 30, 1995 and
the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance, and the
Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Retained Earnings for the
Three Months Ended September 30, 1995.
Out of State Travel Aooroval
5.1 Authorize certain out-of-state travel plans as outlined in the staff report.
e
e
10.
Records Destruction ReQuest
7.1 Approve scheduled destruction of certain records as provided under the City of
Temecula approved Records Retention Policy.
Release of Monument Bonds in Parcel Mao No. 26852
(located northwesterly corner of Winchester road at Margarita Road)
8.1 Authorize the release of Subdivision Monument Bond in Parcel Map No. 26852;
8.2 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Surety.
Quitclaim Deed for Certain Storm Drain Easements within Tract No. 23267-3
(located northerly of Loma Linda Road, easterly of Via Del Coronado, and south of
Temecula Creek)
9.1 Authorize the Mayor to sign the Quitclaim Deed;
9.2 Direct the City Clerk to return the executed Quitclaim Deed to the Riverside
County Flood Control and Water Conservation District.
Amendment to Agreement for Flood Plain Develooment in Tracts No. 23267-3 and
23267-F (located southwesterly of Intersection of Margarita Road at State Highway 79
South)
10.1
10.2
Authorize the approval of the First Amendment to that Agreement relating to
certain properties with the TemecUla Creek Flood Plain in portions of Tracts No.
23267-3 and 23267-F.
Direct the City Clerk to so advise the several developers.
Minutes% 1%23%96 -4- 01/30/96
CiW Council Minutes Jenuarv 23. 1996
11.
ACCePt Public Imorovements in Tract No. 23125-1
(located at the. northeast corner at Butterfield Stage Road at De Portola Road)
11.1 Accept the Public Improvements in Tract No. 23125-1;
11.2
Authorize the initiation of the one-year warranty period, reduction in Faithful
Performance Street, Drainage and Water and Sewer Bond amounts, and release
of the Subdivision Monumentation and Traffic bonds;
11.3 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Surety.
12.
Acceptance of Public Streets into the City-Maintained Street System (Within Tract No.
23125-1)
(located northeasterly corner of De Portola Road at Butterfield Stage Road)
12.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 96- 06
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY-
MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACT NO. 23125-1 )
13.
Acceptance of the Grant of e Storm Drain Easement Over a Portion of Parcel 2 of
Parcel Mao No. 9610 Abuttin{3 Lvndie Lane
(located north of Lyndie Lane and west of Rancho California Road)
13.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 96- 07
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE GRANT OF A STORM DRAINAGE EASEMENT
OVER A PORTION OF PARCEL 2 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 9610 ABUTTING
LYNDIE LANE
Minutes\l \23\96 -5- 01130/96
CiW Council Minutes Jenuerv 23. 1996
14.
15.
16.
Summary Vacation of an Existina Thirty-Six Foot (36') Access ODenine Frontina on
Jefferson Avenue between Overland Drive and Via Montezuma Drive on Parcel 5 of
Parcel MaD No, 22300 and Acceptance of New Access Ooenina
14.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 96- 08
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
SUMMARILY VACATING AN EXISTING THIRTY-SIX FOOT (36') ACCESS
OPENING EXCEPTION TO RESTRICTED ABUTTER RIGHTS FOR PARCEL 5 OF
PARCEL MAP 22300 LOCATED ON JEFFERSON AVENUE BETWEEN
OVERLAND DRIVE AND VIA MONTEZUMA DRIVE
14.2
Approve the new location of a thirty-six foot (36') access opening as described
on Exhibit "A" and authorize the Mayor to sign the acceptance of the access
dedication.
"No Parking" Zones on Ynez Road between Solana Way and the Temecula Town
Center
15.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 96- 09
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
AMENDING RESOLUTION NUMBER 95-84 ESTABLISHING "NO PARKING"
ZONES ON BOTH SIDES OF YNEZ ROAD BETWEEN SOLANA WAY AND THE
TEMECULA TOWN CENTER AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT "A"
Professional Geotechnical Services Contract with Leighton and Associates, Inc. for
Winchester Road at Interstate Route 15. Bridoe Widenine and Northbound Ramp
Improvements. Project No. PW94-21
16.1
Award a contract for Professional Geotechnical Services for Winchester Road
at Interstate Route 15, Bridge Widening and Northbound Ramps Improvements,
Project No. PW94-21, to Leighton and Associates, Inc. for $68,833.00 and
authorize the Mayor to execute the contract.
16.2
Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the
contingency amount of $6,883.30 which is equal to 10% of the contract
amount.
Minutes\1%23~96 -6- 01/30/96
City Council Minutes January 23. 1996
17.
Award of Contract for City Wide Right-Of-Way Tree Trimming Program
17.1
Award a contract for Citywide Right-of-Way Tree Trimming Program to West
Coast Arborists, Inc. for $18,737.00 and authorize the Mayor to execute the
contract.
17.2
Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the
contingency amount of $1,873.70 which is equal to 10% of the contract
amount.
18.
Consultant Services Contract with the Elliott Grouo to Provide Landscape Plan Review
and Inspection Services for Develooment Projects
18.1
Award a Consulting Services Contract to The Elliott Group to provide landscape
plan check review and inspection services for development proposals and
authorize the Mayor to sign said contract.
SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES
19. Second Readinc~ of Ordinance No. 96-01
19.1
Adopt an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 96-01
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ADOPTING AMENDMENT NO. I AMENDING SECTIONS IlloD, Ill.E, III.F AND
III.G TO THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN
The motion carried as follows:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
3 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Roberrs, Lindemans
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: .None
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
I COUNCILMEMBERS: Stone
Minutes% 1%23\96 -7- 01/30/96
City Council Minutes January 23. 1996
19a
Second Readina of Ordinance No. 96-02
19a. 1 Adopt an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 96-02
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA FINDING
A VACANCY TO EXIST IN THE CITY COUNCIL, CALLING FOR A SPECIAL
ELECTION TO BE HELD ON NOVEMBER 5, 1996 TO ELECT A PERSON TO FILL
THE REMAINDER OF THE TERM OF THE VACANT COUNCIL OFFICE AND
PROVIDING FOR THE CITY COUNCIL TO MAKE AN APPOINTMENT TO THE
VACANT OFFICE UNTIL THE COMPLETION OF THE SPECIAL ELECTION
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 3 COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: I COUNCILMEMBERS:
Workers Comoensation Renewal
Birdsall, Roberts, Lindemans
None
None
Stone
Mayor Pro Tem Birdsall asked if this policy includes dividends.
Human Resources
Administrator Grant Yates stated this policy does not include dividends. He explained
that dividends have been decreasing and staff feels more savings can be realized by
choosing a policy with lower fees.
It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Stone to
approve staff recommendation as follows:
6.1
Approve entering into an agreement with California compensation for Employee
Workers Compensation Insurance, subject to final approval as to form by the
City Attorney.
The motion was unanimously carried.
RECESS
Mayor Lindemans called a recess at 7:38 PM. The meeting was reconvened at 7:41 following
the scheduled Community Services District Meeting and the Redevelopment Agency Meeting.
Minutes%1%23\96 -8- 01130/96
City Council Minutee
January 23. 1996
COUNCIL BUSINESS
20.
Public Meetina on Assessment District 95-1 Pursuant to Government Code Section
54954.6
Councilmember Stone announced he would abstain on this item based on a conflict of
interested due to property ownership in Old Town.
Director of Public Works Joe Kicak presentedthe staff report..
Noel Christensen, representing Egan & Associates, outlined the construction of the 4-
lane Western Bypass Corridor including a breakdown of the $14 million cost estimate.
Donald L. Martin, 12132 Woodlawn Avenue, Santa Ana, spoke in opposition to the
forming of Assessment District 95-1.
RECESS
Mayor Lindemans called a recess at 8:00 PM. The meeting was reconvened at 8:12 PM.
Larry Markham, 41750 Winchester Road, Ste L, representing First Pacific National
Bank, requested Parcels 15, 16, 41 and 48 included in Zone C, stating this would be
more equitable.
John F. Firestone, 3301 Hudnall, Dallas, Texas, concurred with Larry Markham's
comments.
Mark Telford, 28481 Rancho California Road, representing Rancho California Industrial
Park II Association, spoke in opposition to being included in Assessment District 95-1.
Richard M. Alvarez, 28373-28545Felix Valdez, representing Alvarez Properties, spoke
in opposition to be included in Assessment District 95-1.
He. nry Testasecca, 44000 Sandia Creek Road, spoke in opposition to Assessment
District 95-1.
21
Review of Process for Interviewina Candidates for City Council Appointment
City Manager Bradley presented a staff report.
It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Stone that the
public comment portion of the meeting for non-agenda items will be limited to 10
minutes to allow ample time to interview the candidates. The motion was unanimously
carried.
Minutes~1%23\96
-9- 01~0~6
City Council Minutes January 23, 1996
It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Roberts that for
public comments on the agenda item, speakers will be limited to two minutes per
speaker. The motion was unanimously carried.
It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Stone that each
candidate will be given a five (5) minute time period for initial interviews 'with an
additional one minute allowed for any specific questions from the City Council. If no
specific questions are asked of the candidate he or she has the option to use the
additional minute to further discuss their qualifications. The motion-was unanimously
carried.
Council consensus was given that after the hearing of public comments and all of the
candidates initial interviews, Councilmember's will announce their selection of three (3)
candidates who they feel are the best qualified to be given a final interview.
CITY MANAGER REPORTS
None given.
CITY ATTORNEY REPORTS
None given.
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Councilmember Roberts to adjourn at
9:10 PM to a meeting on January 25, 1996, for the purpose of interviewing Candidates for
City Council Vacancy, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road,
Temecula, California.
Possible adjournment to January 26, 1996, (if necessary to complete the interview process),
7:00 PM, Rancho California Water District Board Meeting Room, 42135 Winchester road,
Temecula, California.
Adjourned Regular Meeting: January 31, 1996, for the purpose of holding a Public Hearing
on Assessment District 95-1, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road,
Temecula, California.
Next regular meeting: February 13, 1996, 7:00 Pm, Community Recreation Center, 30875
Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California.
Karel F. Lindemans, Mayor
Minutes\l \23%96 - 10.- 01 130/96
City Council Minutes January 23. 1996
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk
Minutes%1%23%96 -11 - 01/30/96
ITEM 3
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA at-towiNG CERTAIN CLAIMS AND
DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMF_I3ULA. DOES RESOLVE,
DEYEKMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A, on file in
the Office of the City Clerk, have been audited by the City Manager, and that the same are
hereby allowed in the amount of $1,950.342.51
Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 13th day of February, 1996.
ATTEST:
Karel F. Ijndemans, Mayor
June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk
[SEAL]
Re~n\93 I
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF ~ULA)
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do certify that the
foregoing Resolution No. 95- was duly adopt~! at a regular meeting of the City Council of the
City of Temecula on the 13th day of February, 1996 by the following roll call vote:
COUNCILlVm-MBERS:
NOES:
COUNCILMF-MBERS:
COUNCILMRMBERS:
June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk
Reeoe\93 2
CITY OF TEMECULA
LIST OF DEMANDS
01/19/96 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
01/25/96 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
02/01/96 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
02/13/96 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
02/13/95 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
01/25/96 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN:'
TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 02/13/95 COUNCIL MEETING:
DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND:
CHECKS:
001 GENERAL
100 GAS TAX
165 RDA-LOW/MOD
190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ (CIP)
280 RDA-CIP
300 INSURANCE
320 INFORMATIONS SYSTEMS
330 SUPPORT SERVICES
340 FACILITIES
380 RDA-DEBT SERVICE
208,646.05
36,749.20
2,665.01
51,383.75
6,938.55
22,764.00
22,736.63
1.17
429,121.49
36, 139.08
45,689.96
7,728.11
2,680.93
12,881.99
948,697.18
$ 121,249.61
510,979.81
636,157.11
162,029.72
404,426.85
115,499.41
$ 1,950,342.51
$ 1,834,643,10
001 GENERAL
100 GAS TAX
165 RDA-LOW/MOD
190 TCSD
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D
280 RDA-CIP
300 INSURANCE
320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS
330 SUPPORT SERVICES
340 FACILITIES
TOTAL BY FUND:
GENIE ROBERTS, DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
I'RONALD E. BRADLEY, CITY MANAGEI~~--
71,179.75
13,658.98
458.20
19,627.63
619.16
697.14
2,394.50
3.16
1,987.61
591.11
1,377.46
680.49
2,224.22
115,499.41
$ 1,950,342.51
, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
VOUCHRE:>
01/19/96
11:38
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIOOS
PAl2' '~
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
100 GAS TAX FUND
190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
19] TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
210 CAPITAL IHPROVEMENT PROJ FUND
280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP
300 INSURANCE FUND
320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS
330 SUPPORT SERVICES
340 FACILITIES
TOTAL
AMOUNT
30,685.85
2,374.62
2,385.90
176.32
43,684.89
11,916.44
25,942.70
2,074.18
1,701,21
307.50
121,249.61
vc)Y'~'2 CITY OF TEMECULA
0', > 11:38 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
27300 01/12/96 002099
BUTTERFIELD ENTERPRISES
27301 01/12/96 000253 POSTMASTER
ADA RESTROOM UPGRADES
NAILING FOR RDA GRAPEVINE
27304 01/19/96 000127 CALIFORNIAN; INC ADS FOR CALIFORNIAN
27304 01/19/96 000127 CALIFORNIAN, INC ADS FOR CALIFORNIAN
27304 01/19/96 000127 CALIFORNIAN, INC PUBLIC NOTICES
27304 01/19/96 000127 CALIFORNIAN, INC ADS FOR CALIFORNIAN
27304 01/19/96 000127 CALIFORNIAN, INC PUBLIC NOTICES
27304 01/19/96 000127 CALIFORNIAN, INC ADS FOR CALIFORNIAN
27304 01/19/96 000127 CALIFORNIAN, INC ADS FOR CALIFORNIAN
280-199-999-5212
280-199-99~-52~0
001-120-9~-5256
001-120-999-5256
001-161-501-5256
001-120-~-5256
001~161-501-5256
001-120-9~9-5256
001-120-~99-5256
7,600.00
2,941.92
29.82
31.56
29.82
12.78
31.69
14.91
29.82
7,600.00
2,941.92
180.40
27305 01/19/96 001625 A BETTER CONFERENCE, IN CONF CALL ON JAN 5 1996
001-110-99~-5260
101.51
101.51
27306 01/19/96 001515 A S A P TRUCK TRACTOR & LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE
27306 01/19/96 001515 A S A P TRUCK TRACTOR & LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE
193-180-9~-5415
193-180-~-5415
56.00
62.00
118.00
27307 01/19/96 001425 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR CORP. LA 6015202010196 TH
320-1~-999-5208
50.12
50.12
27308 01/19/96 001281 ALHAMBRA GROUP PROF SRVCS/DUCK POND/DEC 210-190-143-5802
01/19/96 000475 B N ! PUBLICATIONS, INC SEM:CONST. CLAIMS:SPAGNOLO 001-165-999-5261
900.00
295.00
900.00
295,00
27510 01/19/96 0006]7 BLACK VOICE NEWS, THE NOTICE INVITING BIDS PW94-15 001-120-~9~-5256
192.00
192.00
27311 01/19/96 000123 BURKE WlLLIAMS & SORENS RETAINER SRVCS:NOV 95 001-130-9~-5246
27311 01/19/96 000123 BURKE WlLLIAMS & SORENS LEGAL SERViCES:NOV 95 001-130-9~9-5246
27311 01/19/96 000123 BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENS LEGAL SERVICES:NOV 95 300-199-999-5246
27311 01/19/96 000123 BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENS LEGAL SERVICES:NOV 95 280-199-9~-5246
27311 01/19/96 000123 BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENS RETAINER LEGAL SRVCS:NOV 95 001-130-99~-5246
27311 01/19/96 000123 BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENS CREDIT:INCORRECT HOURLY RATE 300-199-999-5246
27311 01/19/96 000123 BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENS CREDIT:WAITING DOCUMENTATION 001-130-999-5246
27311 01/19/96 000123 BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENS CREDIT:WAITING DOCUMENTATION 300-199-999-5246
27311 01/19/96 000123 BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENS CREDIT:WAITING DOCUMENTATION 280-199-999-5246
27311 01/19/96 OOQ1Z3 BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENS AUG APPROVED BY CLAIM ADJUSTER 300-199-999-5246
27312 01/19/96 001260 C P R S PARK OPERATIONS PARK OPERATIONS CONF:HARTLEY 190-180-999-5261
27313 01/19/96 000137 CHEVRON U S A INC. 789-819-697-2 GEN USAGE 001-162-999-5263
27313 01/19/96 000137 CHEVRON U S A INC. 789-819-697-2 GEN USAGE 001-161-502-5262
2731] 01/19/96 000137 CHEVRON U S A INC. 789-819-697-2 GEN USAGE 190-180-999-5263
27314 01/19/96 001275 COMPUSERVE, INC. SUBSCRIPTION-COMPUTER MAGAZINE 320-1~9-99~-5228
27315 01/19/96 001924 DAVID M. GRIFF[TH & ASS SCHOOL MITIGATION FEE STUDY 001-140-~-5248
27316 01/19/96 000155 DAVLIN AUDIO DUPLICATION SERVS 100-164-604-5250
27316 01/19/96 000155 DAVLIN RECORDINGS OF PC MEETINGS 001-161-501-5250
27316 01/19/96 000155 DAVLIN BROADCASTING OF'COUNCIL MTGS. 001-100-999-5250
01/19/96 0016(>9 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATIO RE-CYCLED GRAFFITI PAINT 100-164-601-5218
4,500.00
15,397.57
19,257.51
1,]84.40
2,771.13
8.00-
131.00-
1,373.65'
29.05-
8,066.84
45.00
13.09
11 .~
13.18
10.00
880. O0
21.55
146.66
800.00
101.82
49,835.75
45.00
37.61
10.00
880.00
968.21
101.82
VOUCHRE2
01/19/96
11:38
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
27318
27319
27319
27319
27319
27319
27320
27320
27320
27320
27320
27320
27321
27322
27322
27322
27322
27322
27322
27322
27322
27322
27322
27323
27323
CHECK
DATE
01/19/96
01/19/96
01/19/96
01/19/96
01/19/96
.01/19/96
01/19/96
01/19/96
01/19/96
01/19/96
01/19/96
01/19/96
01/19/96
01/19/96
01/19/96
01/19/96
01/19/96
01/19/96
01/19/96
01/19/96
01/19/96
01/19/96
01/19/96
01/19/96
01/19/96
VENDOR
NUMBER
000523
000478
000478
000478
000478
000478
000165
000165
000165
000165
000165
000165
001135
001002
001002
001002
001002
001002
001002
001002
001002
001002
001002
000184
000184
VENDOR
NAME
EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER
FAST SIGNS
FAST SIGNS
FAST SIGNS
FAST SIGNS
FAST SIGNS
FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC.
FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC.
FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC.
FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC.
FEDERAL EXPRESS° INC.
FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC,
FIRST CARE INDUSTRIAL M
FIRST INTERSTATE BANK C
FIRST INTERSTATE BANK C
FIRST INTERSTATE BANK C
FIRST INTERSTATE BANK C
FIRST INTERSTATE BANK C
FIRST INTERSTATE BANK C
FIRST INTERSTATE BANK C
FIRST INTERSTATE BANK C
FIRST INTERSTATE BANK C
FIRST INTERSTATE BANK C
G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM
G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYN
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
39656 DIEGO DR LDSC/DEC
SIGNS FOR EMPLOYEE GOLF TOURN.
CITY HALL SIGN - TEMPORARY -
PAINTED AND CARVED POSTS
I NSTALLAT I ON
TAX
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL COSTS
5473 666/+ 0391 0222 RR
5473-6664-0391-0172 RB
5473-6664-0391-0172 RB
5473-666~-0391-0172 RB
5473-6664-0391-0172 RB
5473-6664-0391-0115/JG
5473-6664-0391-0115/JG
5473 666/+ 0391 0123 GT
5473 6664 0391 0123 GT
5473 6664 0391 0123 GT
909 694-1211 POLICE DEPT
909 699-8632 GEM USAGE
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
193-180-999-5240
001-2172
340-199-999-5219
340-199-999-5219
340-199-999-5219
340-199-999-5219
001-140-999-5230
001-120-999-5230
001-162-999-5230
001-162-999-5230
001-161-501-5230
001-140-999-5230
001-150-999-5248
001-I00-999-5260
001-110-999-5258
001-110-999-5260
320-199-999-5242
320-199-999-5221
001-120-999-5258
001-120-999-5260
001-161-501-5260
001-161-502-5260
001-161-502-5260
320-199-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
ITEM
AMOUNT
58.32
150.85
160.Q0
40.00
50.00
15.50
19.50
23.97
18.25
6.50
24.50
41.22
90.00
18.50
262.92
17.0~
32.45
~6.39
176.90
72.00
55,13
14.94
40.18
219.38
27.38
CHECK
AMOUNT
58.32
416,35
133.94
90.00
1,136.45
246.76
27324
27324
27324
27324
27324
27324
27325
27326
27327
27328
27329
27330
27330
27330
01/19/96
01/19/96
01/19/96
01/19/96
01/19/96
01/19/96
01/19/96
01/19/96
01/19/96
01/19/96
01/19/96
01/19/96
01/19/96
01/19/96
000177
000177
0001T7
000177
0001T/'
000177
000175
002149
000939
000193
000695
001667
001667
001667
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFI
HANDS INTERPRETER REFER
I C B 0 - INLAND EMPIRE
I C N A - ANNAPOLIS JUN
INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORTA
KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE
KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE
KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
CONF:GFOA:G ROBERTS 5/19-22
SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETER SRVC
MEMBERSHIP: ANTHONY J. ELMO
PUB:INCREASE-SHIPPING CHARGE
MEMBERSHIP:LAUBER
TEMP HELP W/E 1/07 EVANS
TEMP HELP W/E 1/07 EVANS
TEMP HELP W/E 1/07 PETERSON
190-180-999-5220
001-161-501-5220
001-161-502-5220
001-140-999-5220
190-180-999-5220
001-140-999-5220
001-140-999-5258
001-100-999-5250
001-162-999-5226
001-110-999-5228
100-164-602-5226
001-163-999-5118
100-164-604-5118
001-140-999-5118
12,00
2.73
2.72
89.96
96.78
14.47
275.00
74.00
50.00
2.00
151.00
74.26
144.14
59.15
218.66
275.00
74,00
50.00
2.00
151.00
VOU~q~
01/ 11:38
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK
NLINBER DATE
27330 01/19/96
27330 01119196
27330 01/19/96
27330 01/19/96
27330 01/19/96
27330 01/19/96
27330 01/19/96
27330 01/19/96
27330 01/19/96
27331 01/19/96
27332 01/19/96
27332 01/19/96
27333 01/19/96
27334 01/19/96
27335 01/19/96
2''~' 01/19/96
27~3f 01/19/96
27337 01/19/96
27337 01/19/96
27337 01/19/96
27338 01/19/96
27339 01/19/96
27340 01/19/96
27'340 01/19/96
27341 01/19/96
27342 01/19/96
27343 01/19/96
27344 01/19/96
27345 01/19/96
27346 01/19/96
27347 01/19/96
27'~''~ 01/19/96
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VENDOR VENDOR
NUMBER NAME
001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE
001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE
001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE
001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE
001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE
001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE
001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE
001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE
001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE
000206
001282
001282
002042 KUNZE, INC.
001513
001653 MAILER'S SOFTWARE
001967 MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERV
001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS
001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS
001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS
001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS
000883
001676
002105
002105
00058Q PHOTO WORKS
000253 POSTMASTER
002185
000254
001264 PRICE COSTCO, INC.
002110 PRIME EQUIPMENT
000728 RAMSEY BACKFLOU & PLUMB
000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
TEMP HELP W/E 12/31 EVANS
TENP HELP W/E 12/31 EVANS
TEMP HELP W/E 12/31 EVANS
TEMP HELP W/E 12/'51NUTTER
TENP HELP W/E 12/31NUTTER
TEMP HELP W/E 12/'51NUTTER
TEMP HELP W/E 12/31NUTTER
TEMP HELP W/E 12/Jl EVANS
TEMP HELP WE 12/31 EVANS
KINKOrS OF RIVERSIDE, I MISC COPY SUPPLIES
KNORR POOL SYSTEMS, INC MISC POOL SUPPLIES FOR CRC
KNORR POOL SYSTEMS, INC CREDIT:NEXT DAY TOOK 3 DAYS
RELEASE RETENTION: 1~93-09
LIBERTY AUTO CENTER VEHICLE MAINT/REPAIRS
ACCU MAIL SOFTWARE
TEMP HELP W/E 1/07 LIPOSCHAK
BUSINESS CARDS/POURKAZEMI
TAX
WINDCY,,/ENVELOPES W/CITY LOGO
TAX
MONTELEONE EXCAVATING WATER TRUCK-CNTRL BURN PALA RD
NEXTEL CO!q4UNICATIORS, DISPATCH RADIOS MOBILE SERVS
OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE VEHICLE MA%NT. & REPAIR
OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE VEHICLE MAINT. & REPAIR
FILM & PHOTO DEVELOPING
BULK HA/LING
POSTMASTER - TEMECULA SPECIAL CALL PICK-UP
PRESS-ENTERPRISE CONPAN ADS FOR RECREATION STAFF
MEMBERSHIP DUES:l-TRANSFERABLE
LIGHTS/GENERATOR-X-HAS PARADE
REPAIR CITY BACKFL(34 DEVICES
LEGAL MAPS AND DOCUMENTS
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-165-999-5118
001-165-999-5118
100-164-604-5118
100-164-604-5250
100-164-604-5118
100-164-604-5118
100-164-604-5118
001-163-999-5118
100-164-604-5118
001-110-999-5220
190-182-999-5212
190-182-999-5212
210-2035
190-180-999-5214
320-199-999-5211
100-164-601-5118
001-163-999-5222
001-163-999-5222
001-140-999-5220
001-140-999-5220
100-164-601-5401
320-199-999-5209
100-164-601-5214
100-164-601-5214
190-180-999-5250
330-199-999-5Z30
001-120-999-5230
190-180-999-5254
001-140-999-5226
190-180-999-5238
190-180-999-5212
001-161-502-5224
I TEN
AMOUNT
5.52
5.52
5.53
83.20
22.53
22.53
22.54
68.62
133.21
25.91
282.16
15.00-
31,126.85
338.64
221.43
507.52
38.25
2.96
268.22
20.79
660.00
984.00
118.39
15.00
40.50
170. O0
450.00
233.53
30.00
765.38
98.00
70.52
PAGE 3
CHECK
AMOUNT
646.75
25.91
267.16
31,126.85
338.64
221.43
507.52
330.22
660.00
984.00
133.39
40.50
170.00
450.00
233.53
30.00
765.38
98.00
70.52
VOUCHRE2
01/19/96
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
27349
2735O
27351
27352
27353
27354
27354
27355
27355
27355
27355
27355
27355
27355
27355
27355
27355
27355
27355
27355
27355
27355
27355
27356
27357
27358
27359
11:38
CHECK
DATE
01/19/96
01/19/96
01/19/96
01/19/96
01/19/96
01/19/96
01/19/96
01/19/96
01/19/96
01/19/96
01/19/96
01/19/96
01/19/96
01/19/96
01/19/96
01/19/96
01/19/96
01/19/96
01/19/96
01/19/96
01/19/96
01/19/96
01/19/96
01/19/96
01/19/96
01/19/96
01/19/96
VENDOR
NUMBER
OOO266
000418
001897
002124
002133
000519
000519
0003~5
000373
0003?5
0003?5
0003~5
000375
0003~5
0003~5
0003?'5
0003?5
0003?'3
000375
000375
000375
000375
000375
002184
00218~
002016
000345
VENDOR
NAME
RIGHTWAY
RIVERSXDE CO. CLERK & R
RONALD L. HARRIS CONSTR
SAN DIEGO, CITY OF
SOUTH COAST NEWSPAPERS,
SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR
SOUTH COUNTY PEST CORTR
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPNON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPNON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CAL]F TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPNON
SPAGNOLO, DON
SPORTS TURF MANAGERS AS
TSUTSUMZDA & ASSOCIATES
XEROX CORPORATION BILLZ
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIOOS
]TEN
DESCRIPTION
PUMPING SERVICES FOR THE POND
APER+URE CARDS DUPLICATES
RELEASE RETENTiON PW92-10
RE-ISSUE/INSTALL RADAR POLICE
ADS FOR THE CALIFORNIAN
PEST CONTROL SERVICES - CITY
PEST CONTROL/PARKS/DEC
909 202-5153 GY
909 202-4767 GT
909 202-4767 GT
909 202-4764 Pw BLAZER
909 203-9994 BB
909 205-8688 PW EOC
909 202-4760 JH
909 202-4765 PW MAINT CREW
909-Z02-5208/BH/JAN
909-202-4755/CLTY VAN/JAN
909 202-9876 HP
909-202-4754/KH/JAN
909-202-3800/MW/JAN
909-2029-0934/VAN-JAN
909 205-7877 EOC
909 202-4756 KRTN FOR EOC
EMPYEE REIMB:VANCE CORP VS CIT
MEMBERSHIP:HARRINGTON
DESIGN FOR NEW CITY HALL
LEASE FOR COPIER-METER USAGE
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
190-180-999-5250
001-163-999-5220
210-2035
001-170-999-5214
280-199-999-5254
340-199-999-5250
190-180-999-5250
001-150-999-5208
001-161-501-5208
001-161-502-5208
100-164-601-5208
100-164-601-5208
100-164-604-5208
100-164-603-5208
100-164-601-5208
190-180-999-5208
190-180-999-5208
190-180-999-5208
190-180-999-5208
190-180-999-5208
190-180-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
001-1280
190-180-999-5226
210-199-650-5804
330-199-999-5217
ITEM
AMOUNT.
50.39
5.00
11,058.04
2,089.81
19.17
42.00
32.00
85.96
29.69
29.69
100.08
45.50
87.33
68.92
63.8~
49.07
40.12
57.80
57.84
71.89
41.62
45.29
37.74
625.00
75.00
600.00
1,531.21
pAG,'~
CHECK
AMOUNT
50.39
5.00
11,058.0~
2,089.81
19.17
74.00
912.37
625.00
75.00
600.00
1,531.21
TOTAL CHECKS
121,249.61
VOW' R
01
16:11
CXTY OF TEHECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE 9
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
100 GAS TAX FUND
165 RDA DEV- LO~//NOD SET ASIDE
'190 CONNUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D
210 CAPITAL INPROVENENT PROJ FUND
280 REDEVELOPNENT AGENCY -
300 INSURANCE FUND
320 INFORNATION SYSTENS
330 SUPPORT SERVICES
340 FACILITIES
380 RDA - DEBT SERVICE
TOTAL
A!qOUNT
54,244.97
9,315.11
625.86
16,421;93
6,935.63
22,784,00
3,890.98
1.17
1,2.:32.87
1,565.75
301.41
3,404.36
563,~7
812.75
389,079.79
510,979.81
VOUCHRE2
01/25/96
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
27360
27361
27362
614574
614574
614574
614574
614574
614574
614574
614574
614574
614574
614574
614574
614574
614574
614574
614574
614574
614574
614574
614574
614574
614574
614574
614574
614574
673561
673561
673561
673561
673561
673561
673561
673561
673561
673561
673561
673561
673561
673561
673561
673561
673561
27366
16:11
CHECK
DATE
01/23/96
01/24/96
01/24/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
VENDOR
NUMBER
001438
O0O473
001072
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
000444
0007'24
VENDOR
NAME
MO~REY, JODI
CALIFORNIA REDEVELOPMEN
BANK OF AMERICA NT & SA
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FXRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FXRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (ZRS)
FIRSTAX (ZRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (XRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (XRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (ZRS)
FIRSTAX (ZRS)
FIRSTAX (XRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (IRS)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EO0)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
FIRSTAX (EDD)
A & R CUSTOM SCREEN PRI
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETING SER
DEVEL HOUS CONF:MEYER:1/25-26
2/1/96 INTEREST:TRUST 60310RDA
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEOERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEOERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 MEOICARE
000283 MEOICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEOICARE
000283 MEOICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEOICARE
000283 MEOICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000444
000444
000444 SDI
000444
000444 SDI
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
SPORTS PROGRAMS AWARDS
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-100-999-5250
165-199-999-5261
380-1040
001-2070
100-2070
165-2070
190-2070
191-2070
192-2070
193-2070
280-2070
300-2070
320-2070
330-2070
340-2070
001-2070
100-2070
165-2070
190-2070
:191-2070
192-2070
193-2070
194-2070
280-2070
300-2070
320-2070
330-2070
340-2070
001-2070
100-2070
190-2070
193-2070
280-2070
001-2070
100-2070
165-2070
190-2070
191-2070
192-2070
193-2070
280-2070
300-2070
320-2070
330-2070
340-2070
190-183-999-5380
ITEM
AMOUNT
50.00
290.00
389,079.79
10,732.04
2,422.01
29.56
2,421.80
92.38
84.43
416.43
214.76
128.52
365.45
104.69
148.08
2,728.70
511.17
14.62
707.39
21.44
23.48
86.46
.24
68.96
22.43
60.72
23.16
72.87
24.36
8.83
42.64
5.11
8.08
2,810.41
585.08
8.91
557.21
17.11
10.68
98.32
37.74
38.17
92.35
17.96
16.46
882.67
CHECK
AMOUNT
50.00
290.00
389,079.79
21,501.79
4,379.4--?-...
882.
VOLy--'~--~,
01,
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
27367
27368
27369
27370
27371
27372
27374
27375
27375
27375
27375
27375
27375
27375
27375
27375
27376
27376
27377
27377
27377
27377
27377
27377
27377
27377
27378
2~---'~
16:11
CHECK
DATE
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
'01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
VENDOR
NUMBER
001910
000101
000101
002099
000862
000901
001166
000127
000127
000127
000127
000127
000127
000135
000135
000135
000135
000447
000447
000447
000447
000447
000447
000447
000447
000447
002036
002036
002036
002036
002036
002036
002036
002036
002106
000518
VENDOR
NAME
AMERITECH CUMMUNICATION
APPLE ONE, INC.
APPLE ONE, INC.
BUTTERFIELD ENTERPRISES
CALPELRA
C P R S SUPERVISORS' SE
CAL DOR SPECIALTIES, IN
CALIFORNIAN, INC
CALIFORNIAN, INC
CALIFORNIAN, INC
CALIFORNIAN, INC
CALIFORNIAN, INC
CALIFORNIAN, INC
CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER
CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER
CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER
CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER
CONTRONIX OF HEHET
CONTRONIX OF fiEMET
CONTRONIX OF HEMET
CONTRONIX OF HEMET
CONTRONZX OF HEMET
CONTRONIX OF HEMET
CONTRONIX OF HEMET
CONTRON]X OF HEMET
CONTRONIX OF HEMET
CONRAD, DENNIE E.
CONRAD, DENNIE E.
CONSOLIDATED REPROGRAPH
CONSOLIDATED REPROGRAPH
CONSOLIDATED REPROGRAPH
CONSOLIDATED REPROGRAPH
CONSOLIDATED REPROGRAPH
CONSOLIDATED REPROGRAPH
CONSOLIDATED REPROGRAPH
CONSOLIDATED REPROGRAPH
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
COPIER SERVICE AGREEMENT
TEMP HELP W/E 10/14 DARBO
TEMP HELP W/E 10/21DARBO
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
330-199-999-5217
001-110-999-5118
001-110-999-5118
RESTROON RENT/DURING RDA IMPRV 280-199-999-5212
LABOR RELATION CONF:YATES:3/14 001-150-~-5258
AWARDS BANQUET & MTG:2/9:STAFF 190-180-999-5261
SENIOR CENTER REPAIR AND MAINT 190-181-999-5212
AD FOR P~94-15/SAM HICK PRK
AD FOR BIDS/WINCH & I15
PUBLIC HEAR AD/OLD TWN SPECIFI
PUBLIC HEAR AD/PA95-0103 GFI
BID AD/PW95-17 FRONT ST BARRIE
BID AD/PW95-06 PVNNT MGNT SYST
JOSEPH RD & NICOLAS RD SIGNS
TAX
D.U.I. CHECKPOINT SIGNS
TAX
MAINTENANCE CONTRACT - RADIOS
MAINTENANCE CONTRACT - RADIOS
MAINTENANCE CONTRACT - RADIOS
MAINTENANCE CONTRACT - RADIOS
MAINTENANCE CONTRACT - RADIOS
MAINTENANCE CONTRACT - RADIOS
MAINTENANCE CONTRACT - RADIOS
MAINTENANCE CONTRACT -.RADIOS
MAINTENANCE CONTRACT * RADIOS
001-120-~29-5256
001-120-~-5256
001-120-~-5256
001-161-501-5256
001-120-~-5256
001-120-~-5256
100-164-601-52~
100-164-601-52~4
100-164-601-5244
100-164-601-5244
001-110-999-5250
001-171-999-5215
001-170-999-5215
100-164-604-5250
100-164-601-5250
001-163-999-5250
001-165-999-5250
190-180-999-5250
001-162-999-5250
REFUND-PARKING CITATION #10116 001-170-4055
REFUND-PARKING CITATION #10116 001-2260
REPROGRAPHICS/NEW CITY HALL
REPROGRAPHICS/NEW CITY HALL
REPROGRAPHICS/NEW CITY HALL
REPROGRAPHICS/NEW CITY HALL
REPROGRAPHICS/NEW CITY HALL
REPROGRAPHICS/NEW CITY HALL
REPROGRAPHICS/NEW CITY HALL
REPROGRAPHICS/NEW CITY HALL
210-199-650-580~
210-199-650-5804
210-199-650-5804
210-199-650-580/,
210-199-650-5804
210-199-650-5804
210-199-650-580/,
210-199-650-580/,
DA FAMILY SUPPORT 002106 SUPPORT 190-2140
DEL RIO CARE ANIMAL HOS
ANIMAL CARE SUPPLIES FOR TANGO 001-170-~-5327
ITEM
AMOUNT
217,18
185.76
185.76
826.00
75.00
42.00
605.79
51.12
40.47
29.82
32.72
59.73
59.73
60.00
4.65
320.00
24.80'
168.00
252.00
474.00
292.50
544.50
195.00
97.50
474.50
752.50
20.00
5.00
35.08
12.35
28.33
12.35
16.09
28.55
70.90
25.22
82.5O
60.90
PAGE 2
CHECK
AMOUNT
217.18
371.52
826.00
75.00
42.00
605.79
273.59
409.45
3,250.50
25. O0
228.87
82.50
60.90
VOUCHRE2
01/25/96
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
2738O
2738O
2738O
27381
27382
27383
2738~
27384
27384
2738~
273~
27385
27386
27386
27386
27386
27386
27387
27388
27388
27388
27388
27388
27389
27390
27391
27392
27392
27392
27393
27394
27394
27395
27395
27396
16:11
CHECK
DATE
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
VENDOR
NUMBER
000165
000165
000165
001810
001135
002122
000184
000184
000184
000184
000184
002160
000177
000177
000177
000177
000177
001609
001609
001609
001609
001609
001517
002098
000194
000194
000194
001429
000199
000199
001894
001894
001667
VENDOR
NAME
FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC.
FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC.
FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC.
FINN, DANIEL F & NICOLE
FIRST CARE INDUSTRIAL M
FIRST LINE CONSTRUCTION
G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM
G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM
G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM
G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM
G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM
GARY RAUB ASSOCIATES
GLENN1ES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GORDON, JOANNE
GREATER ALARM COMPANY,
GREATER ALARM COMPANY,
GREATER ALARM COMPANY,
GREATER ALARM COMPANY,
GREATER ALARM COMPANY,
HARTMANN, JOHN
HEALTH & HUMAN RESOURCE
HOUSE OF MOTORCYCLES
RETIREMENT TRUS
RETIREMENT TRUS
RETIREMENT TRUS
INACOM INFORMATION SYST
iNTERNAL REVENUE SERVIC
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVIC
JOHNSON FENCE COMPANY
JOHNSON FENCE COMPANY
KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIQOS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS MAiL SERVICES
SALES TAX ASSISTANCE
FLU SHOTS/SEPT 95
MASONRY REPAIR FOR CITY PARKS
909-181-1123/GENERAL USAGE
909-694-1993/GENERAL USAGE
909-694-4353/PALA PARK
909-694-4354/PALA PARK
909-695-3564/ALARM
REPAIR ROLL SHADE AT CRC
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
REFUND-TRANSFERED CLASS
ALARM MONITORING NEW CITY HALL
ALARM MONITORING * STORAGE
ALARM MONITORING - MAINT, YARD
ALARM MONITORING - MAINT, YARD
ALARM MONITORING - MAINT. YARD
REFUND-SECURITY DEPOSIT
EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PRGN
REPAIR & MAINT. POLICE MOTOR.
000194 DEF COMP
000194 DEF COMP
000194 DEF COMP
MISC COMPUTER SUPPLIES
000199 IRS GARN
000199 IRS GARN
CRC/INSTALL 4 BARRICADES POST
CRC MAINTENANCE POOL EQUIPMENT
TEMP HELP W/E 01/14 EVANS
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-162-999-5230
001-110-999-5230.
001-162-999-5230
001-2030
001-2640
190-180-999-5212
320-199-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
190-182-999-5212
330-199-999-5220
001-140-999-5220
001-140-999-5220
190-181-999-5220
190-180-999-5220
190-183-4982
340-199-999-5250
340-199-999-5250
190-180-999-5250
100-164-601-5250
001-162-999-5250
190-2900
001-150-999-5250
001-170-999-5214
001-2080
100-2080
190-2080
320-199-999-5221
001-2140
100-2140
190-182-999-5212
190-180-999-5212
001-163-999-5118
ITEM
AMOUNT
20.62
25.23
22.25
200.70
115.00
783.33
544.66
1,063.42
28.89
29.35
52.80
280.00
64.22
48.49
36.37
278.00
37.24
35.00
90.00
35.00
30.00
37.50
7.50
100.00
345.05
19,24
1,020.78
187.83
452.78
320.37
154.91
154.90
280.00
539.00
99.01
CHECK
AMOUNT
68.10
200.70
115.00
783.33
1,719.12
280.00
35.00
200.00
100.00
345.05
19.24
1,661.39
320.37
309.81
819.0J~
VOV '~
01.
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
27396
27397
27397
27398
27399
27400
27401
27402
27402
27403
27403
27403
27~
27404
27404
27404
27404
27404
27404
27404
27405
27406
27407
27407
27408
27409
27410
27411
27412
27412
27412
2
16:11
CHECK
DATE
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
VENDOR VENDOR
NUMBER NAME
001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE
000206 KINKO'S OF RIVERSIDE,
000206 KINKO'S OF RIVERSIDE,
001282 KNORR POOL SYSTEMS, INC
001534 LA HASTERS OF FiNE TRAV
000669 LEAGUE OF CAL. CITIES
000482 LEIGHTON & ASSOCIATES,
001891 LINFIELD SCHOOL
001891 LINFIELD SCHOOL
000214 LUNCH & STUFF CATERING
000214 LUNCH & STUFF CATERING
000214 LUNCH & STUFF CATERING
001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS
001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS
001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS
001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS
001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS
001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS
001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS
001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS
001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS
001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS
000228 MOBIL, iNC.
000845 NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITI
001599 NORTH COUNTY BASKETBALL
001599 NORTH COUNTY BASKETBALL
002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES
001150 O'BRIEN, CARY
001383 P M W ASSOCIATES, INC.
PALONAR GRADING & PAVIN
000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE
CITY OF TEMEOULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERZOOS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
TEMP HELP W/E 01/14 EVANS
MISC COPY SUPPLIES
MISC COPY SUPPLIES
MISC POOL SUPPLIES FOR CRC
5 YEAR SERVICE AWARDS
96 DUES:PURSUANT TO ART VII
PROF SRVCS/MORAGA RD WIDENING
INTERIM FIRE STATION - RENT
INTERIM FIRE STATION - RENT
LUNCH FOR MEETING 1/18
1ST RESPONSE TRAINING BRK
CITY COUNCIL MTG 01-Z]-96
LETTERHEAD STATIONARY
TAX
BUSINESS CARDS:BJORKLUND
TAX
BUSINESS CARDS:T MILLER
BUSINESS CARDS:D. HILLBERG
TAX
BUSINESS CARDS:G t4OLNICK
TAX
BUSINESS CARDS:M. SALAZAR
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES
ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP FOR THE CiTY
BASKETBALL ASSIGNMENT FEES
BASKETBALL TEAM FORFEIT FEES
CONM DEVEL BLOCK GRANT AD
REPAIR PED BARRIER/CHAIN FENCE
TEAMBUILDING DEBRIEF 1/10/96
REFUND-OVRPMT ON PLANS & SPECS
000246 PER REDE
000246 PER REDE
000246 PERS RET
000246 PERS RET
000246 PERS RET
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
100-164-604-5118
330-199-999-5220
001-110-999-5220
190-182-999-5212
001-150-999-5265
001-100-999-5226
210-165-625-5804
001-171-999-5470
001-171-9~9-5470
001-110-999-5260
001-150-999-5261
001-100-999-5260
001-170-999-5222
001-170-999-5222
001-171-999-5222
001-171-999-5222
001-161-501-5220
001-110-999-5222
001-110-999-5222
001-110-999-5222
001-110-999-5222
001-162-999-5222
001-170-999-5262
001-100-999-5226
190-183-999-5380
190-18~-999-5380
001-140-999-5254
100-164-601-5402
001-150-999-5248
001-199-4053
001-21]0
100-2130
001-2.S90
100-2~90
165-2390
ITEM
AMOUNT
192.19
7.28 ·
23.65
112.91
3,000.00
100.00
354,00
600.00
600.00
29.25
32.50
80.00
46.06
3.57
205.00
15.88
110.44
38.25
2.96
38.25
2.96
41.21
36.91
2,116.00
72.00
80.00
29.82
700.00
664.00
10.00
191.61
65.19
13,126.16
2,374.73
82.54
PAGE 4
CHECK
AMOUNT
291.20
30.93
112.91
3,000.00
100.00
354.00
1,200.00
141.75
504.58
36.91
2,116.00
152.00
29.82
700.00
664.00
10.00
VOUCHRE2
01/25/96
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
16:11
CHECK
DATE
VENDOR
NUMBER
VENDOR
NAME
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
27412 01/25/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES# RETIRE 000246 PERS RET
27412 01/25/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET
27412 01/25/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET
27412 01/25/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET
27412 01/25/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET
27412 01/25/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PERS PET
27412 01/25/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET
27412 01/25/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET
27412 01/25/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET
27412 01/25/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR
27412 01/25/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR
27412 01/25/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR
27412 01/25/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 00024'6 SURVIVOR
27412 01/25/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR
27412 01/25/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR
27412 01/25/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR
27412 01/25/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR
27412 01/25/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR
27412 01/25/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR
27412 01/25/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR
27412 01/25/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR
27412 01/25/96 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR
27413 01/25/96 001958 PERS LONG TERM CARE PRO 001958 PERS L-T
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
27414
27414
27414
27414
27414
27414
27414
27414
27414
27414
27414
27414
27414
27414
27414
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000249
000253
000253
000253
000253
000253
000255
000255
000546
27415
27415
27415
27415
27415
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
POSTMASTER
POSTMASTER
POSTMASTER
POSTMASTER
POSTMASTER
PRO LOCK & KEY
PRO LOCK & KEY
RADIO SHACK
27416
27416
27417
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
EXPRESS MAIL & POSTAL SERVS
EXPRESS MAIL & POSTAL SERVS
EXPRESS MAIL & POSTAL SERVS
EXPRESS MAiL & POSTAL SERVS
EXPRESS MAIL & POSTAL SERVS
TCSD LOCKSMITH SERVICES
TCSD LOCKSMITH SERVICES
MISC COMPUTER SUPPLIES
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
190-2390
191-?.390
192-2590
193-2590
280-2590
300-2590
320-2590
330-2590
340-2390
001-2590
100-2590
165-2590
190-2390
191-2590
192-2390
193-2590
194-2390
280-2590
300-2390
320-2390
330-2590
340-2390
100-2122
001-162-999-5242
001-161-501-5260
001-162-999-5220
001-110-999-5260
001-150-999-5261
001-165-999-5262
190-183-999-5320
001-161-502-5262
001-161-501-527'2
001-161-502-5260
001-162-999-5260
340-199-999-5242
001-100-999-5260
001-100-999-5260
001-162-999-5220
001-140-999-5230
001-120-999-5250
100-164-604-5250
001-161-501*5230
001-110-999-5230
190-180-999-5212
190-180-999-5212
320-1~-~9-5221
ITEM
AMOUNT
2,697.09
94;44
111.05
324.86
226.2~
106.83
282,54
109.73
349.87
-50.39
9.52
.23
11.86
.47
.93
1.39
.93
.46
.93
2.09
51.70
23.95
38,54
89.88
34.75
22.62
27.04
38.53
14,69
17,00
16.75
8.00
10.86
28.50
40.00
20.65
17.25
62.40
25.75
10.75
15.00
35.00
100.43
84.14
PAF
CHECK
AMOUNT
20,22?
51.70
431.76
131,15
VOV"~"'~
01.
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUHBER
27418
27418
27418
27419
27420
27420
27420
27421
27421
27421
27422
27422
27423
27424
27~.~
27425
27425
27426
27426
27426
27426
27426
27426
27427
27427
27427
27427
27427
27427
27428
27429
27430
27430
27430
27430
16:11
CHECK
DATE
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
'01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
VENDOR
NUMBER
0008~6
0008~6
000836
000947
000262
000262
000262
000426
000426
000426
000526
000266
000266
000266
000266
000271
000271
001942
001942
001942
001942
001942
001942
000704
000704
000704
000704
000704
000704
001872
001~0
000926
000926
000926
000926
000926
VENDOR
NAME
RANCH MUFFLER SPECIALIS
RANCH MUFFLER SPECIALIS
RANCH MUFFLER SPECIALIS
RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER
RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL
RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL
RANCHO INDUSTRIAL SUPPL
REFSDAL, JAN W. & HEIDI
REFSDAL, JAN W. & HEIDI
REGENTS OF UNIVERSITY 0
RIGHTWAY
RIGHTWAY
RIGHTWAY
RIGHTWAY
ROBERT BEIN, ~ FROST &
ROBERT BEIN, ~ FROST &
S C SIGNS
S C SIGNS
S C SIGNS
S C SIGNS
S C SIGNS
S C SIGNS
S K S, INC/INLAND OIL
S K S, INC/1NLAND OIL
S K S, INC/INLAND OIL
S K S, XNC/INLAND OIL
S K S, INC/INLAND OIL
S K S, XNC/INLAND OIL
SALAZAR, MARIANNE
SOFTWARE HOUSE INT'L, Z
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PER]OOS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
VEHICLE MAINT/REPAIR/SUPPLIES
LABOR
TAX
BLUEPRINTS REPOGRAPHICS
VARIOUS LOCATIONS
VARIOUS LOCATIONS
VARIOUS LOCATIONS
INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES - PARKS
INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES - PARKS
INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES - PARKS
REFUND-SECURITY DEPOSIT & RENT
REFUND-SECURITY DEPOSIT & RENT
LAND USE LAW CONF:1/26:MILLER
PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL
PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL
PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL
PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL
PLAN CHECK SRVCS/OCT 95
PLAN CHECK SRVCS/NOV 95
PUBLIC NOTICE SIGNS & POSTINGS
PUBLIC NOTICE SIGNS & POSTINGS
PUBLIC NOTICE SIGNS & POSTINGS
POSTINGS FOR NOTICE OF P,H,
PUBLIC NOTICE SIGNS & POSTINGS
POSTINGS FOR NOTICE OF P.H,
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES
FUEL FOR CiTY VEHICLES
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES
REIMB:CODE ENFORCE CERT TRAIN
MISC CUMPUTER SUPPLIES
VARIOUS LOCATIONS
VARIOUS LOCATIONS
VARIOUS LOCATIONS
VARIOUS LOCATIONS
VARIOUS LOCATIONS
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
190-180-999-5242
190-180-999-5242
190-180-999-5242
330-199-~-5220
190-180-999-5240
191-180-999-5240
193-180-999-5240
190-180-999-5212
190-180-999-5212
190-180-999-5212
190-183-4990
190-2900
001-161-501-5272
190-180-999-5238
190-180-999-52~8
190-180-999-52~8
190-180-999-5238
001-162-999-5248
001-162-999-5248
001-161-501-5256
001-161-501-5256
001-120-999-5256
001-161-501-5256
001-120-999-5256
001-161-501-5256
100-164-601-5263
001-165-999-5263
100-164-604-5263
001-162-999-5263
001-110-999-5263
190-180-999-5263
001-162-999-5261
320-199-999-5221
190-182-999-5240
191-180-999-5240
191-180-999-5319
192-180-999-5319
193-180-999-5240
ITEM
AMOUNT
360.00
40.00
27.90
18.32
798.32
47.07
2,841.42
44.80
50.19
11.85
80.00
100.00
235.00
125.78
62.89
188.66
172.50
362.82
282.25
450.00
200.00
65.00
390.00
65.00
190.00
374.86
43.98
109.30
63.38
37.03
192.62
80.00
166.24
89.62
33.12
6,629.40
22,553.43
69.11
PAGE 6
CHECK
AMOUNT
427.90
18.32
3,686.81
106.8~
180.00
235.00
549.83
645.07
1,360.00
821.17
80.00
166.24
29,374.68
VOUCHRE2
01/25/96
16:11
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAC/
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
CHECK
DATE
VENDOR
NUMBER
VENDOR
NAME
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
27431
27431
27432
27432
27432
27432
27432
27432
27432
27432
27432
27432
27433
27434
27435
27435
27435
27436
27437
27438
27439
27439
27439
27439
27440
27441
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
001212
001212
000375
000375
000375
000375
000375
000375
000375
000375
0003~
00037'3
001546
001497
000305
000305
000305
002177
000307
000306
002111
002111
002111
002111
000320
00201&
SOUTHERN CALIF GAS COMP
SOUTHERN CALIF GAS COMP
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
SOUTHERN CALIF TELEPHON
STRAIGHT LINE GLASS
T'R W, INC.-INFORMATXON
TARGET STORE
TARGET STORE
TARGET STORE
TEMECULA SISTER CITIES
TEMECULA TROPHY CO.
TEMECULA VALLEY PIPE &
TOGO~S
TOGO~S
TOGO~S
TOGO~S
TOWNE CENTER STATIONERS
TSUTSUMIDA & ASSOCIATES
07-8272-901-5751-9/CRC
07-8274-036-1451-3/SEN CENTER
909-202-4752-SN
909-202-4769/JS
909-202-4204/KL
909-202-4763/PB
909 202-4762 RP
909-202-4758/RR
909-202-4770/RB
909-202-4757-JG/JAN
909 205-7826 GR
909-202-4759/AE/JAN
MAINT/REPAXRS CRC
CREDIT REPTS FOR RDA LOANS
MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES
DECORATIONS/BREAKFAST W/SANTA
BREAKFAST WITH SANTA ITEMS
FAREWELL DINNER FOR NAKAYAMA
GAVELS w/LOGO
MAINT/REPAIR OF PARK/REC FAC.
LUNCH TEAMBLDG DEBRIEF 1/10/96
LUNCH TEAMBLDG FIRE 1/17/96
LUNCH TEAMBLDG POLICE 1/17/96
1ST RESPONSE TRAINING LUNCH
MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES
CITY HALL SPACE PLAN:l/I-15
27442 01/25/96 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP
27442 01/25/96 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP
27442 01/25/96 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP
27442 01/25/96 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP
27442 01/25/96 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP
27442 01/25/96 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (OEF. C 001065 DEF COMP
27442 01/25/96 001065 U S C M/PEBSCO (DEF. C 001065 DEF COMP
U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR
U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR
U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR
U S C N/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR
U S C M/PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR
000389
000389
000389
000389
000389
27443
27443
27443
27443
27443
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
190-182-999-5240
190-181-999-5240
190-180-999-5208
001-100-999-5208
001-100-999-5208
001-100-999-5208
001-100-999-5208
001-100-999-5208
001-110-999-5208
001-120-999-5208
001-140-999-5208
001-162-999-5208
190-180-999-5212
280-199-999-5250
190-183-999-5370
190-183-999-5370
190-183-999-5370
001-100-999-5280
001-100-999-5220
190-180-999-5212
001-110-999-5261
001-171-999-5261
001-170-999-5261
001-150-999-5261
001-163-999-5220
210-199-650-5804
001-2080
100-2080
190-2080
280-2080
300-2080
320-2080
340-2080
001-2160
100-2160
190-2160
193-2160
280-2160
269.06
186.33
?8.97
91.90
58.86
32.79
178.01
81.67
50.97
43.14
134.24
60.81
50.00
50.00
112.18
30.89
108.74
1,042.97
50.62
130.37
57.20
49.50
49.50
45.00
86.06
650.00
6,288.32
164.34
629.79
57.20
5.00
312.50
87.50
228.40
82.80
399.66
47.88
75.7O
455.39
811.36
50.00
SO.O0
251.8L
1,042.
50.62
130.37
201.20
86.06
650.00
7,5~.65
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
27444
27444
27444
27444
27445
27446
27447
16:11
CHECK
DATE
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
01/25/96
VENDOR
NUMBER
000325
000325
000325
000325
001342
001857
002186
VENDOR
NAME
UNITED WAY OF THE INLAN
UNITED WAY OF THE INLAN
UNITED WAY OF THE ]NLAN
UNITED WAY OF THE ]NLAN
WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY,
WELLS FARGO BANK NATL A
ZUNA, PAUL
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
000325 UW
000325 UW
000325 UW
000325 U~
BUILDING MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
FOUR $25 SAVING BONDS-BIKE PGM
BOOT ALLOWANCE FOR 1995
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-2120
100-2120
190-2120
280-2120
190-182-999-5212
001-2270
001-162-999-5243
ITEM
AMOUNT
67.24
10.96
15.00
.30
286.14
100.00
'95.00
PAGE 8
CHECK
AMOUNT
93.50
286.14
100.00
95.00
TOTAL CHECKS
510,979.81
VOUCHRE2
02/01/96
16:21
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
100 GAS TAX FUND
190 CQNMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND
280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP
300 INSURANCE FUND
320 INFORMATION SYSTENS
330 SUPPORT SERVICES
340 FACILITIES
380 RDA - DEBT SERVICE
TOTAL
AMOUNT
5,452.69
3,822.33
4,114.77
3.12
29,503.65
1,208.43
18,007.15
2,249.57
416.25
11~761.76
559,617.39
636,157.11
02, 16:21
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR
NUMBER DATE NUMBER
27470 01/30/96 000718
27471 01/30/96 000740
27472 01/31/96 002193
27473 01/31/96 002005
280796 02/01/96 001072
612404 01/29/96 001300
612404 01/29/96 001300
612404 01/29/96 001300
612404 01/29/96 001300
27476 02/01/96 001674
27477 02/01/96 002194
27477 02/01/96 002194
274,Z_78. 02/01/96 001876
~ 02/01/96
27480 02/01/96
27481 02/01/96 000123
27482 02/01/96 000588
27483 02/01/96
27484 02/01/96
27484 02/01/96
27485 02/01/96
27485 02/01/96 000138
27486 02/01/96 000144
27487 02/01/96 000146
27488 02/01/96 000155
27488 02/01/96 000155
27488 02/01/96 000155
27489 02/01/96
27490 02/01/96 001165
2 02/01/96 001002
VENDOR
NAME
NATIONAL RECREATION &PA
PICCA DELl
GRAHAM COMPANY
BUILDING ENERGY CONSULT
BANK OF ANERICA NT & SA
FIRSTAX (QTR ADJUSTMENT
FIRSTAX (QTR ADJUSTMENT
FIRSTAX (QTR ADJUSTMENT
FIRSTAX (QTR ADJUSTMENT
ADKINS, ROBERT STEVEN
AMERICAN PLANNING ASSN.
AMERICAN PLANNING ASSN.
BE]JING LONGEVITY, ]NC.
BELISLE, CHARLOTTE
BONILLA, SILVIA
BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENS
C C A P A CONFERENCE
002077 CALIFORNIA UNIVERSITY 0
001139 CHIP MORTON PHOTOGRAPHY
001139 CHIP MORTON PHOTOGRAPHY
000138. CITICORP NORTH AMERICA
CITICORP NORTH AMERICA
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPOR
COUNTS UNLIMITED
DAVLIN
DAVLIN
DAVL]N
EDWARDS, SALLY
ENTERTAINMENT PUBLICATI
FIRST INTERSTATE BANK C
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
MEMBERSHIP:H. PARKER
LUNCH:SOUTHWEST TOUR MEETING
INSPECT:EMERGENCY LIGHT SYSTEM
RELEASE RETENTION:PWO\95-O1CSD
RDA DEBT SERVICE PAYMENT 2/1
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
190-180-999-5226
001-110-999-5260
190-182-999-5250
210-2035
380-1040
4TH QTR PMT OF UNEMPLOY INSURA 001-2350
4TH QTR PMT OF UNEMPLOY INSURA 100-2350
4TH QTR PMT OF UNEMPLOY INSURA 190-2350
4TH QTR PMT OF UNEMPLOY [NSURA 280-2350
TCSD INSTRUCTON EARNINGS
PUB:ZONING NEWS/THONNHILL
PUB:ZONING NEWS/THONNHILL
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT
REFUND:SECURITY DEPOSIT
APPROVED BY CLAIM ADJUSTER:JUL
CONF:LEGISLATIVE:NAASEH:2/16
PUB:WEED HANDBOOK-PARK NAINT
COPY PHOTO OF NEW ARTWORK
COPY PHOTO OF NEW ART WORK
190-183-999-5330
001-161-502-5228
001-161-501-5228
190-183-999-5330
190-2900
190-2900
300-199-999-5246
001-161-502-5261
19G-180-999-5228
280-199-999-5270
280-199-999-5270
LEASE PMT FOR TELEPHONE SYSTEM 320-2800
LEASE PMT FOR TELEPHONE SYSTEM 320-199-999-5391
REFRESHMENTS:TV SHOW TRIP
TRAFFIC CENSUS PROGRAM 3RD QTR
RECORDINGS OF PC MEETINGS
DUPLICATION SERVS:COUNCIL MTGS
BROADCAST OF COUNCIL MTG 1/25
REFUND:SECURITY DEPOSIT
FUNDRAISING:ENTERTAIN BOOKS 96
5473-6664-0391-0198/MJM
190-183-999-5350
100-164-602-5406
001-161-501-5250
001-100-999-5250
001-100-999-5250
190-2900
190-183-4980
001-110-999-5258
ITEM
AMOUNT
215.00
53.88
125.00
27,760.00
559,617.39
1,114.54
567.94
1,344.59
178.28
84.00
25.00
25.00
96.00
100.00
50.00
18,007.15
55.00
71.50
91.59
188.56
1,371.20
56.37
100.00
800.00
146.66
796.2~
890.62
100.00
60.00
390.00
PAGE 1
CHECK
AMOUNT
215.00
53.88
125.00
27,760.00
559,617.39
3,205.35
8~.00
50.00
96.00
100.00
50.00
18,007.15
55.00
71.50
280.15
1,427.57
100.00
800.00
1,833.51
100.00
60.00
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA
02/01196 16:21 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT
NUHBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER
ITEM
AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
27491 02/01/96 001002 FIRST INTERSTATE BANK C 54T$-6664-O391-O198/MJM 001-110-999-5260
27492 02/01/96 001989 FOX NETWORK SYSTEMS, IN CYBE'X'REBODT Zl/CUMPUTER SUPPL 320-199-999-5221
27492 02/01/96 001989 FOX NETWC)RK SYSTEMS, IN FREIGHT 320-199-999-5221
27492 02/01/96 001989 FOX NETMORK SYSTEMS, IN TAX 320-199-999-5221
14.59
350.00
15.00
27.13
404.59
392.13
27493 02/01/96 00018~ G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909 676-3526 FIRE ALARM CITY 320-199-999-5208
27493 02/01/96 00018~ G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYN 909 693-0956 GENERAL USAGE 320-199-999-5Z08
27493 02/01/96 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909 694-4356 K.HINTERGARDT MEN 320-199-999-5208
27493 02/01/96 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909 699-2475 PUBLIC WORK 100-16~-601-5208
27493 02/01/96 00018~ G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909 699-7945 CRC FIRE ALARM 320-199-999-5208
80.29
27.21
28.71
39.59
52.51
228.31
27494 02/01/96 002141 GEIS, PAUL MOTORCYCLE REPAIR SERVICES 001-170-999-5214
27494 02/01/96 002141 GEIS, PAUL MOTORCYCLE REPAIR SERVICES 001-170-999-5214
100.00
100.00
2OO.O0
27495 02/01/96 002108 GEOSOILS, INC STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS 001-1280
129.00
129.00
27496 02/01/96 000481 GEOTECHNICAL & ENVIRONM PROF SRVCS:SPORTS PARK:PW94-07 210-190-137-5802
27496 02/01/96 000481 GEOTECHNICAL & ENVIRONM PROF SRVCS:SPORTS PARK:PW94-07 210-190-137-5802
27496 02/01/96 000481 GEOTECHNICAL & ENVIRONN PROF SRVCS:SPORTS PARK:PW94-07 210-190-137-5802
27496 02/01/96 000481 GEOTECHNICAL & ENVIRONM PROF SRVCS:SPORTS PARK:PW94-07 210-190-137-5802
27496 02/01/96 000481 GEOTECHNICAL & ENVIRONM PROF SRVCS:SPORTS PARK:PW94-07 210-190-137-5802
27497 02/01/96 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-140-999-5220
27497 02/01/96 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-162-999-5220
27497 02/01/96 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-140-999-5220
27497 02/01/96 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT M[SC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-110-999-5220
100.00
500.00
456.78
300.00
342.00
200.04'
59,17
88.36
66.41
1,698
413.98
27498 02/01/96 001697 HALL, NANCY LEE TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330
180.00
180.00
27499 02/01/96 HODGE, ALFRED & ANNAMAR OVERCHARGE:TCSD RATES 95/96 190-180-999-5375
27499 02/01/96 HODGE, ALFRED & ANNAMAR OVERCHARGE:TCSO RATES 95/96 191-180-999-5375
51.66
3.12
54.78
27500 02/01/96 001158 HOLIDAY INN
HOTEL:PERMITS PLUS:HAFELI:2/8 320-199-999-5261
65.00
65.00
27501 02/01/96 001429 INACON INFORMATION SYST NETMANAGE CHAMELEON INTERNET 320-199-999-5221
176.15
176.15
27502 02/01/96 002170 INDENTICATOR CORPORATIO FINGERPRINT REPLACEMENT KIT 001-170-999-5242
27502 02/01/96 002170 INDENTICATOR CORPORATIO FREIGHT 001-170-999-5242
27502 02/01/96 002170 INDENTICATOR CORPORATIO TAX 001-170-999-5242
27503 02/01/96 KAITA, TERESA REFUND-TCSD CLASS REGISTRATION 190-183-4980
27504 02/01/96 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE TEMP HELP W/E 1/21 EVANS 001-163-999-5118
27504 02/01/96 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE TEMP HELP W/E 1/21 EVANS 100-16~-604-5118
27505 02/01/96 001123 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIE MISC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES 100-164-601-5218
27505 02/01/96 001123 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPL[E TAX 100-164-601-5218
27506 02/01/96 000209 L & M FERTILIZER, INC. MISC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 100-164-601-5218
360.00
6.88
27.90
17.50
99.01
192.19
82.00
6.36
42.24
394.78
17.50
291.20
88.36
47
16:21
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
27507
27508
27509
27510
27511
27511
27512
27512
27512
CHECK VENDOR VENDOR
DATE NUMBER NAME
02/01/96 001534 LA MASTERS OF FINE TRAV
02/01/96 LLYOD, PATTI M
02/01/96 000214 LUNCH & STUFF CATERXNG
02/01/96 001967 MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERV
02/01/96 000220 MAURICE PRINTERS, INC.
02/01/96 000220 MAURICE PRINTERS, INC.
02/01/96 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS
02/01/96 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS
02/01/96 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS
27512 '02/01/96 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS
27512 02/01/96 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS
27513 02/01/96 000883 MONTELEONE EXCAVATING
27514 02/01/96 001654 MONTEREY SYSTEMS, INC.
~ ,.02/01/96 MULHALL, TERRY
27b~b 02/01/96 002088 OLD TOWN TYPEWRITER
27517 02/01/96 002190 PACIFIC INLAND CAPITAL
27518 02/01/96 001243 PALMQUIST, MARY
27519 02/01/96 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C
27520 02/01/96 001097 ROADLINE PRODUCTS, INC.
27520 02/01/96 001097 ROADLINE PRODUCTS, INC.
27521 02/01/96 000873 ROBERTS, RONALD H.
27522 02/01/96 000926 SOUTHERN CALIF EOISON
27523 02/01/96 000752 STONE, JEFFREY E.
27524 02/01/96 STRICKLAND, KATIE
27525 02/01/96 000305 TARGET STORE
27526 02/01/96 000320 TOWNE CENTER STATIONERS
27527 02/01/96 000459 TUMBLE JUNGLE
27528 02/01/96 001939 WINDSOR PROJECTS, INC.
2 02/01/96 000347 ZEE SERVICE COMPANY, IN
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
AIRFARE:ECON DEV CONF:MCLARNEY
REFUND:ACTIVITY CANCELLATION
REIMB FOR LOST COFFEE POT
TENP HELP W/E 1/14 LIPOSCHAK
CITY EMPLOYMENT APPLICATIONS
TAX
BUSINESS CARDS:FRONT RECEPTION
BUSINESS CARDS:S. JONES
TAX
BUSINESS CARDS/IRENE ROBERS
TAX
REPAIR UNDER"SIDEWALK DRAIN
FILM, CARDS, PROCESSING
REFUND-TCSD CLASS REGISTRATION
TYPEWRITER REPAIR
MARKET RENTAL SURVEY - HONDA
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
BLUEPRINT CIP PRJT PW95-15
PARTS FOR STENCIL TRUCK
TAX
LEAGUE CONF: ROBERTS 1/11-1/12
2-02-351-5489/28781 FRONT ST
LEAGUE CONF:STONE 11/29-12/3
REFUND-TCSD CLASS REGISTRATION
SR CENTER MISC SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
FEB 95 RENT: JAN 95 CAM
MEDICAL SUPPLIES/FIRST AID KIT
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-110-999-5258
190-183-4982
001-100-~-5260
100-164-601-5118
001-150-~99-5222
001-150-~-5222
001-120-~-5222
001-120-~-5222
001-120-~-5222
190-180-~-5222
190-180-~9-5222
100-164-601-5402
330-199-999-52T7
190-183-4982
001-150-999-5242
280-199-999-5248
190-183-999-5330
210-165-658-5802
100-164-601-5218
100-164-661-5218
001-100-999-5258
100-164-601-5240
001-100-999-5258
190-183-4980
190-181-999-5301
100-164-604-5220
190-183-999-5330
340-199-999-52~4
001-162-999-5242
ITEM
AMOUNT
81.00
70.00
33.28
634.40
262.00
20.31
38.25
102.50
10.90
38.25
2.96
600.00
416.25
70.00
55.00.
750.00
423.20
44.87
665.13
51.55
30.00
113.44
17.34
42.00
32.31
27.49
840.80
11,761.76
53.82
PAGE 3
CHECK
AMOJNT
81.00
70.00
33.28
634.40
282.31
192.86
600.00
416.25
70.00
.55.00
750.00
423.20
44.87
716.68
30.00
113.44
17.34
42.00
32,31
27.49
840.80
11,761.76
53.82
TOTAL CHECKS 636,157.11
VOUCHRE2
01/25/96
16:35
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
Pt
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
100 GAS TAX FUND
165 RDA DEV- LO~,//MOD SET ASIDE
190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
210 CAPITAL IMPROVENENT PROJ FUND
280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP
TOTAL
AMOUNT
84,410,70
1,479.14
2,2.39.15
25,627.90
18,669.33
19,547.85
10,055.65
162,029.72
V(
01, /6 16:35
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE
27450 02/13/96
VENDOR VENDOR
NUMBER NAME
002158 A S A P SERVICES INC.
27451 02/13/96 002093
27451 02/13/96 002093
27453 02/13/96 000638
27453 02/13/96 000638
27453 02/13/96 000638
27454 02/13/96
27455 02/13/96
27455 02/13/96
BERRYMAN AND HENIGAR
BERRYMAN AND. HENIGAR
CALIFORNIA DEPT OF CONS
CALIFORNIA DEPT OF CONS
CALIFORNIA DEPT OF CONS
002182 D K S ASSOCIATES
000754 ELLIOTT GROUP, THE
000754 ELLIOTT GROUP, THE
27456 02/13/96 000164
27456 02/13/96 000164
27456 02/13/96 000164
27457 02/13/96
27457 02/13/96
2~ 02/13/96
2 02/13/96
274~d 02/13/96
27459 02/13/96
27460 02/13/96
27461 02/13/96
27461 02/13/96
27462 02/13/96
27463 02/13/96
27463 02/13/96
27464 02/13/96
27465 02/13/96
27465 02/13/96
27466 02/13/96
27467 02/13/96
27467 02/13/96
27468 02/13/96
27468 02/13/96
ESGIL CORPORATION
ESGIL CORPORATION
ESGIL CORPORATION
001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE
001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE
000711
000711
000711
GRAPHICS UNLIMITED LITH
GRAPHICS UNLIMITED LITH
GRAPHICS UNLIMITED LITH
002098 HOUSE OF MOTORCYCLES
002187 LAKE ELSINORE ANIMAL FR
000220 MAURICE PRINTERS, INC.
000220 MAURZCE PRINTERS, INC.
002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE
001383 P M W ASSOCIATES, INC.
001383 P M W ASSOCIATES, INC.
000270 R J M DESIGN GROUP, INC
000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S
000406 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF~S
001483 TOM DOOSON & ASSOCIATES
002016 TSUTSUMIDA & ASSOCIATES
002016 TSUTSUHIDA & ASSOCIATES
000332 VANDORPE CHOU ASSOCIATI
000332 VANDORPE CHOU ASSOC[ATI
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIOOS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
STRIPING/SANTA GERTRUDIS TRAIL
PROF SRVCS/TAX CONSULTANTS
CREDIT:EXCEEDS DEPOSIT AMOUNT
SMI 4TH QTR REPORT 1995
SMI 4TH QTR REPORT 1995
SMI 4TH QTR REPORT 1995
OCT SERVS/I-15 CORRIDOR STUDY
LANDSCAPE REVIEWS
CREDIT:OVERCHARGED PLAN CHECK
PLAN CHECK SRVCS/OCT 95
PLAN CHECK SRVCS/DEC
PLAN CHECK SRVCS/DEC 95
LANDSCAPE MAINT/TCSD SLOPES
LANDSCAPE MAINT/SPORTS PARK
TCSD RECREATION BROCHURE
CRC INFORMATION BROCHURES
TAX
POLICE MOTORCYCLE REPAIRS
ANIMAL CONTROL SRVCS/DEC 95
REDEVELOPMENT NEWSLETTER
NEWSLETTER MAILING
VEHICLE MAINT/PUBLIC WORKS
PROF SRVCS/RDA CONSULTING/DEC
PROF SRVCS/RDA CONSULTING/DEC
PROF SRVCS PARKVIEW SITE
BOOKING FEES OCT 95
ACIIS 3RD/4TH QTR
PROF SRVCS/FIRST ST BRIDGE
CITY HALL SPACE PLAN:l/I-15
CITY HALL SPACE PLAN:l/I-15
PLAN CHECK SRVCS/OCT 95
PLAN CHECK SRVCS/TRACT 27827
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
210-190-142-5804
280-2645
280-2645
001-2280
001-2290
001-162-4229
210-165-633-5802
001-161-501-5250
001-161-501-5250
001-162-999-5248
001-162-999-5248
001-162-999-5248
193-180-999-5415
190-180-999-5415
190-180-999-5222
190-180-999-5222
190-180-999-5222
001-170-999-5214
001-172-999-5255
280-199-999-5264
280-199-999-5230
100-164-601-5214
280-199-999-5248
165-199-999-5248
210-190-138-5802
001-170-999-527'5
001-170-999-5325
280-199-807-5802
210-199-650-5804
210-199-650-580~
001-162-999-5248
001-162-999-5248
ITEM
AMOUNT
4,046.36
2,125.00
500.00-
1,142.31
1,642.35
139.23-
5,368.99
1,050.00
247.50-
21,876.33
1,500.45
1,351.80
18,669.33
7,605.64
15,618.36
2,231.00
172.90 '
2,221.92
3,630.28
4,269.00
750.00
1,47g.14
2,239.15
2,239.15
5,500.00
10,156.80
18,076.60
1,172.50
442.50
3,020.00
3,7'37.98
5,787.57
PAGE 1
CHECK
AMOUNT
4,046.36
1,625.00
2,645.43
5,368.99
802.50
24,T28.58
26,274.97
18,022.26
2,221.92
3,630.28
5,019.00
1,479.14
4,478.30
5,500.00
28,233.40
1,172.50
3,462.50
VOUCHRE2
01/25/96
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
27468
27468
27468
27468
27469
16:35
CHECK VENDOR VENDOR
DATE NUMBER NAME
02/13/96
02/13/96
02/13/96
02/13/96
02/13/96
000332 VANDORPE CHOU ASSOCIATI
000332 VANDORPE CHOU ASSOCIATI
000332 VANDORPE CHOU ASSOCIATI
000332 VANDORPE CHOU ASSOCIATI
000379 W DEAN DAVIDSON CO.
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIOOS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
PLAN CHECK SRVCS/TRACT 22716
PLAN CHECK SRVCS/NOV 95
PLAN CHECK SRVCS/DEC 95
OVRCHGED PLAN CK SERV/B95-1463
PROF SRVCS/PARK RESTROOMS
TOTAL CHECKS
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-162-999-5248
001-162-999-5248-
001-162-999-5248
001-162-999-5248
210-190-146-5802
ITEM
AMOUNT
6,631.70
4,413.40
1,727.94
150.00-
1,170.00
CHECK
AMOUNT
22,148.59
1,170.00
162,029.72
17:12
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
100 GAS TAX FUND
190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND
280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY -
300 INSURANCE FUND
TOTAL
AMOUNT
33,851.84
19,758.00
2,833.25
335,152.23
11,392.83
1,438.70
404,426.85
VOUCHRE2
02/01/96
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
27532
27532
27532
27532
27532
27532
27532
27533
27533
27534
27534
27535
27536
27536
27536
27537
27537
27538
27539
27540
27541
27542
27542
17:12
CHECK
DATE
02/13/96
02/13/96
02/13/96
02/13/96
02/13/96
02/13/96
02/13/96
02/13/96
02/13/96
02/13/96
02/13/96
02/13/96
02/13/96
02/13/96
02/13/96
02/13/96
02/13/96
02/13/96
02/13/96
02/13/96
02/13/96
02/13/96
02/13/96
VENDOR
NUMBER
000123
000123
000123
0001Z3
000123
000123
0001Z3
001945
001945
002129
002129
000202
001982
001982
001982
000944
000944
001713
000406
002021
000329
001342
001342
VENDOR
NAME
BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENS
BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENS
BURKE WlLLIAMS & SORENS
BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENS
BURKE WlLLIAMS & SORENS
BURKE WILLIAMS & SORENS
BURKE WILLIANS & SORENS
E. A. MENDOZA CONTRACTI
E. A. MENDOZA CONTRACTI
GREAT WEST CONTRACTORS,
GREAT WEST CONTRACTORS,
J F DAVIDSON ASSOCIATES
L WILLIAMS LANDSCAPE, I
L WILLIAHS LANDSCAPE, I
L WILLIAMS LANDSCAPE, I
MCCAIN TRAFFIC SUPPLY,
MCCAIN TRAFFIC SUPPLY,
NORRIS-REPKE, INC.
RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF~S
SELF#S JANITORIAL SERVI
URBAN DESIGN STUDIO, IN
WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY,
WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY,
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
PROF LEGAL SERVS:GENERAL
PROF LEGAL SERVS: GEM.& CLAIM
PROF LEGAL SERVS: GEM & CLAIM
PROF LEGAL SERVS: RDA AGENCY
PROF LEGAL SERVS:RETAINER
INCORRECT HRLY RATE:BC LEROY
INCORRECT HR RATE:D R DEGRAFF
RETENTION: PYMT #7:SPORTS PARK
PROG PYMT 7 SPORTS PARK
PARKVIEW SITE:PW95-09
RETENTION NO. 1:PARKVIEW SITE
DESIGN SRVCS:SPORTS PARK
TREE TRIMMING CITY-WlDE/RGT-WY
TREE TRIMMING CITY-WlDE:RGT WY
EMERGENCY TREE TRIMMINNG
TRAFFIC SIGNAL CTRL SOFTWARE
TAX
ENG SERVS FOR FIRST ST EXTENSI
BOOKING FEES/NOV 95
JAN 95 RESTROOM MAINT SERVS
DESIGN GUIDELINES
BLDG MAINT CLEANING SUPPLIES
BLDG MAINT CLEANING SUPPLIES ·
TOTAL CHECKS
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-130-999-5246
001-130-999-5246
300-199-999-5246
280-199-999-5246
001-130-999-5246
001-130-999-5246
001-130-999-5246
210-2035
210-190;137-5804
210-190-626-5804
210-2035
210-190-137-5802
100-164-601-5402
100-164-601-5402
100-164-601-5402
210-165-643-5804
210-165-643-5804
280-199-807-5802
001-170-999-5273
190-180-999-5250
001-161-502-5248
190-182-999-5212
190-181-999-5212
ITEM
AMOUNT
4,500.00
14,166;92
1,438.70
4,042.93.
1,326.92
330.00-
2.00-
23,146.46'
231',464.53
131,204.64
13,120.46'
3,055.39
16,880.00
1,688.00
1,190.00
5,285.00
409.59
7,349.90
11,040.00
1,494.00
3,150.00
339.25
1,000.00
CHECK
AMOUNT
25,143.47
208,318.07
118,084.18
3,055.39
19,758.00
5,694
7,349.90
11,040.00
1,494.00
3,150.00
1,339.25
404,426.85
ITEM 4
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
Genie Roberts, Director of Finance
February 13, 1996
City Treasurer's Report as of December 31, 1995
PREPARED BY:
Steve Oakley, Accountant
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive and file the City Treasurer's Report
as of December 31, 1995.
DISCUSSION: Reports to the City Council regarding the City's investment portfolio and
receipts, disbursements and fund balance are required by Government Code Sections 53646
and 41004 respectively. The City's investment portfolio is in compliance with the Code
Sections as of December 31, 1995.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
ATTACHMENTS: 1. City Treasurer's Report as of December 31, 1995
2. Schedule of Assets, Liabilities, and Fund Equity as of December 31,
1995
City of Temecula
City Treasurer's Report
As of December 31, 1995
Cash Activity for the Month of December:
Cash and Investments as of December 1, 1995
Cash Receipts
Cash Disbursements
Cash and Investments as of December 31, 1995
$ 52,075,049
2,613,455
(4, 187,550)
$ 50,500,954
Cash and Investments Portfolio:
Type of Investment
Petty Cash
General Checking
Benefit Demand Deposits
Local Agency Investment Fund
Deferred Compensation Fund
Deferred Compensation Fund
Defined Contribution Fund
Trust Accounts-TCSD COPs
Reserve Account-TCSD COPs
Trust Accounts-RDA Bonds
Construction Fund-RDA Bonds
Reserve Account-RDA Bonds
Institution Yield
City Hall
First Interstate
First Interstate
State Treasurer 5.748 %
ICMA
PEBSCO
PEBSCO
Bank of America 5.408
BofA - Bayerische Landesbank 6.870
Bank of America 5.408
BofA - Bayerische Landesbank 6.210
BofA - Bayerische Landesbank 7.400
Balance
$ 800
84,659
3,726
36,089,090
289,439
420, 168
29,565
17,477
502,690
728,420
10,886,000
1,448,920
$ 50,500,954
(1)
(1)
(1)-This amount is net of outstanding checks.
Per Government Code Requirements, this Treasurer's Report is in compliance with
the City of Temecula's investment policy and there are adequate funds available
to meet budgeted and actual expenditures of the City of Temecula for the next
thirty days.
City of Temecula
Schedule of Assets, Liabilities, and Fund Balances
As of December 31,1995
c~y (1)
Asse~s:
Cash end investments $ 30,502,001 $
Receivables 2,850,189
Due from other funds 542,393
Land held for resale 918,171
Fixed assets-net 458,941
Total assets $ 35,271,695 $
Cornmurlit¥
Services Redevelopmerit
District Agency
221,137 $ 19,777,816 $
122,300 197,862
2,103,053
343,437 $ 22,078,731 $
Total:
50,500,954
3,170,351
542,393
3,021,224
458,941
57,693,863
Liabilities and fund equity:
Liabilities:
Due to other funds $ 509,593
Other liabilities 3,527,793 $
Total liabilities 4,037,386
=und equity:
Contributed capital 1,055,344
Retained earnings 545,165
Fund balances:
Reserved (2) 5,512,755
Designated (3) 19,628,418
Undesignated 4,492,627
Total fund equity 31,234,309
Total liabilities and fund equity
$ 35,271,695 $
104,954
104,954
$ 32,800 $
61,799
94,599
893,173 6,675,507
15,308,625
(654,690)
238,483 21,984,132
:
343,437 $ 22,078,731
542,393
3,694,546
4,236,939
1,055,344
545,165
13,081,435
34,937,043
3,637,937
53,456,924
57,693,863
(1) Includes General Fund, CIP Fund, Gas Tax Fund, other special revenue funds, and deferred comp agency funds.
(2) Includes amounts reserved for encumbrances, land held for resale, long-term notes receivable, Iow/mod housing,
and debt service.
(3) Includes amounts designated for economic uncertainty, debt service and continuing appropriations.
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
City Clerk
February 13, 1996
Records Destruction Approval
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
RECOMMENDATION: Approve scheduled destruction of certain records as provided
under the City of Temecula approved Records Retention Policy.
BACKGROUND: On March 22, 1992, the City Council approved Resolution No. 92-17
which authorizes the destruction of certain city records which have become outdated, obsolete
or are excess documents, in compliance with Sections 34090 through 34090.7 of the
Government Code.
The records management program, administered by the City Clerk's Office, is in the process
of microfilming all inactive records that are over two (2) years old. Exhibit A details Public
Works (Retention Code 80605) from 6/7/93 (93004) to 1/10/94 (93007), a Plot Plan
(Retention Code 80605)7/9/90 (00001), and Parcel Maps (Retention Code 80605 from
10/17/90 (00003) to 12/28/93 (23248-2). Exhibit B details Tract Maps (Retention Code
20301 ) from 9/29/66 (03552) to 4/17/90 (21760), Plot Plans (Retention Code 20324) from
12/6/84 (-8231)to 9/13/85 (08769), and a Parcel Merger (Retention Code 20319)5/28/82
(14933). These records have been microfilmed in triplicate with a copy distributed to the City
Clerk's Records Vault, the Public Works Department and one in permanent off-site storage.
These records are all qualified for destruction at this time under the provisions of the Records
Retention Schedule. The City Attorney has reviewed this request and has signed Exhibits "A"
and "B" as provided for in Resolution No. 92-17.
ATTACHMENTS:
Exhibit A
Exhibit B
JSG
FROM:
DATE:
ExhIBIT A
City Clerk
Paula Sargent
Office T~echnician
February 13, 1996
Destruction of Records Request
Attached is a print out of.' Public Works (Retention Code 80605) from 6/7/93 (93004) to
1/10/94 (93007), a Plot Plan (Retention Code 80605) 7/9/90 (00001), and Parcel Maps
(Retention Code 80605) from 10/17/90 (00003) to 12/28/93 (23248-2). These records have
been microfilmed in triplicate with a copy distributed to the City Clerk's Records Vault, the
Public Works Department and a copy to the Vault in San Diego.
The undersigned have reviewed and approved this destruction request.
Pursuant to the requirements of Government Code Section 34090, I hereby give my consent
to the destruction of records under the direction of the City Clerk pursuant to the City of
Temecula's adopted Destruction of Obsolete Records Policy.
Department Head: '~J2--- ..
· oseph Kicak, .Public Works Department
City Attorney:
R:~fonns~iostn~t.tqs
RRDES~...RR061 City of Temecula Doc. Ref ......... 163 Page 1
01/24/1996 Files Ready for Destruction Retention Code... 80605 10:22:21
Destruction Date. 02/13/1996
D, Item Ret. File Reference # Storage Media
R~ Date Ref. Brief Description Code Security Class Storage Location Location Reference
163 07/09/1990 00001 Plot Plan 00001 80605 0063 Film 3821~41A0001
Group I 163/120/%~1e Vault
163 10/17/1990 00003 Parcel Merger 3 80605 0072 Film 3821MIA0002
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 06/07/1993 93004 Public Works 93-004 80605 0075 Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/="ne Vault
163 06/29/1993 93010 Public Works 93-010 80605 0076 Film 3821MIA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 12/01/1993 93012 Public Works 93-012 80605 0076 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 12/28/1993 23248 Parcel Mep 23248-2 80605 0073 Film 3821MiA0001
Group I 163/120/The Vault
163 01/10/1994 93007 Public Works 93-07 80605 0049 Film 3821MIA0002
Group I 163/120/The Vault
7 Records Processed
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
I~rRIBIT B
City Clerk
Paula Sargent
Office Technician
February 13, 1996
Destruction of Records Request
Attached is a print out of: Tract Maps (Retention Code 20301) from 9/29/66 (03552) to
4/17/90 (21760), Plot Plans (Retention Code 20324) from 12/6/84 (08231) to 9/13/85
(08769), and a Parcel Merger (Retention Code 20319) 5/28/82 (14933). These records have
been microffimed in triplicate with a copy distributed to the City Clerk's Records Vault, the
Public Works Department and a copy to the Vault in San Diego.
The undersigned have reviewed and approved this destruction request.
Pursuant to the requirements of Government Code Section 34090, I hereby give my consent
to the destruction of records under the direction of the City Clerk pursuant to the City of
Temecula's adopted Destruction of Obsolete Records Policy.
Department Head:
City Attorney:
G~~o" "~arUnent
R:\form~\dggtu~t.rq,
RRDESTY...RR061 City of Temecula Doc. Ref ......... 161 Page 1
01/23/1996 Files Ready for Destruction Retention Code.., 20301 08:06:53
Destruction Date. 02/13/1996
De Item Ret. File Reference # Storage Media
Re~ Date Ref. Brief Description Code Security Class Storage ~ocation Location Reference
161 09/29/1966 03552 Tract 03552 20301 0077 Film 3821/~lA0001
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 11/22/1966 03583 Tract 03583 20301 0077 Film 3821HIA0001
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 05/04/1968 03646 Tract 03646 20301 0077 Film 3821~[1A0001
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 05/04/1968 03713 Tract 03713 20301 0077 Film 3821H1A0001
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 05/12/1969 03883 Tract 03883 20301 0077 Film 3821H1A0001
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 10/07/1969 03869 Tract 03869 20301 0077 Film 3821M1A0001
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 07/28/1972 03587 Tract 03587 20301 0077 Film 3821MiA0001
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 07/28/1975 07402 Tract 07402 20301 0077 Film 3821HIA0001
Group I 161/120/The Vault
16, ,/13/1976 07401 Tract 07401 20301 0077 Film 3821HiA0001
Group I 161/120/T~e Vault
161 12/04/1978 12005 Tract 12005 20301 0077 Film 3821M1A0002
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 12/09/1980 12005 Tract 12005-1 20301 0077 Film 3821MIA0002
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 09/21/1982 12005 Tract 12005-2 20301 0077 Film 3821M1A0002
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 04/17/1990 21760 Tract 21760 20301 0077 Film 3821M1A0002
Group I 161/120/The Vault
13 Records Processed
RRDESTY..,RR061 City of Temecula Doc. Ref ......... 161 Page 1
01/23/1996 Files Ready for Destruction Retention Code... 20324 07:57:23
Destruction Date. 02/13/1996 ~
Doc. Item Rat. File Reference # Storage Media
Ref. Date Ref. Brief Description Code Security Class Storage Location Location Refere.
161 12/06/1984 08231 Plot Plan 08231 20324 0077 Film 3821MIA0002
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 06/21/1985 08632 Plot Plan 08632 20324 0077 Film 3821MiA0002
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 08/28/1985 08784 Plot Plan 08784 20324 0077 Film 3821M1A0002
Group I 161/120/The Vault
161 09/13/1985 08769 Plot Pla~ 08769 20324 0077 Film 3821M1A0002
Group I 161/120/The Vault
4 Records Processed
RRDESTY...RR061 City of Temecula Doc. Ref ......... 161 Page 1
01/23/1996 Files Ready for Destruction Retention Code... 20319 08:01:11
~- Destruction Date. 02/13/1996
D Item Ret. File Reference # Storage Media
ReI. Dace Ref. Brief Description Code Security Class Storage Location Location Reference
161 05/28/1982 14933 Parcel Merger 14933 20319 0077 Film 3821MIA0002
Group I 161/120/The Vault
i Records Processed
APPROVAL~
CITY
ATTORNEY
DIR. OF FINANC
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Manager/City Council
Genie Roberrs, Director of Finance
February 13, 1996
Property Insurance Renewal
PREPARED BY: Allie Kuhns, Senior Management Analysl~/
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council take the following actions:
1. Approve the City of Temecula Property Insurance Policy renewal with Reliance
Insurance Company, Hartford Steam Boiler, and Pacific Insurance Company, Ltd./Agricultural
Insurance for the period of February 26, 1996 through February 26, 1997 in the amount of
$73,260; and,
2. Appropriate $ 26,600from the Insurance Internal Service Fund Retained Earnings to the
Property Insurance Account.
DISCUSSION: The City's insurance policy with Aetna Insurance Company expires on
February 26, 1996. In June 1995, the City was put on notice that upon the expiration of this
current policy, which includes earthquake insurance coverage in the amount of $7.5 million,
Aetna will only carry earthquake insurance in the amount of $2.5 million, leaving the City $5
million under the City Council's previously directed level of earthquake insurance coverage.
Consequently, staff directed the City's property insurance broker, Barney & Barney, to market
the City's property insurance policy. In response to this request, Barney & Barney conducted
a comprehensive inventory of all City buildings and property requiring coverage, and obtained
three qualified proposals for basic property insurance from the following companies in the
amounts listed. Additionally, Barney & Barney has provided a proposal for earthquake and
flood insurance from Pacific Insurance Company Ltd./Agricultural Insurance Company, and a
proposal for equipment floater insurance from Hartford Steam Boiler Insurance Company:
INSURANCE CARRIER
BASE HARTFORD TOTAL
PREMIUM EARTHQUAKE FLOATER PREMIUM
Reliance Insurance
Affiliated Insurance
Aetna Insurance
$17,440 $54,948 $872 $73,260
$16,675' $54,948 $872 $72,495
$46,079** $49,448 $872 $96,399
*Although this premium is slightly lower than Reliance, the overall Standard & Poor's Solvency
Rating for Affiliated Insurance is "vulnerable," indicating financial instability. Reliance is rated
as "good," which rating indicates no solvency issues. Therefore, staff recommends that the
second low proposal submitted by Reliance Insurance be awarded the policy.
**Aetna's base premium does include earthquake in the amount of $2.5 million. Any
coverage in addition to this amount must be obtained as supplemental earthquake insurance
from a separate carrier.
The total property insurance premium of $73,260 is significantly higher than the previous
policy year premium of 934,019. Since the Northridge earthquake, earthquake insurance, if
it can even be obtained, is extremely expensive. For this reason, Aetna has elected only to
carry earthquake insurance in an amount not exceeding 92.5 million for any one policy. Based
on the difficulty in obtaining earthquake insurance, compounded by Aetna's refusal to provide
full earthquake insurance coverage, Barney & Barney was able to obtain only one packaged
quote for earthquake insurance. This package includes one quote from Pacific Insurance
Company Ltd. (which is a subsidiary of ITT/Hartford Insurance) for the first 95 million of
insurance, and a quote from Agricultural Insurance for the supplemental 95 million of insurance
(Agricultural did not provide a quote for the first 95 million). Staff requested that Barney &
Barney obtain a quote for 910 million in coverage based on the total value of all city property
having been assessed at 912.4 million through Barney & Barney's comprehensive analysis.
Ten million dollars, or 81% of total assessed property value, was determined to be appropriate
earthquake/flood insurance coverage during the analysis.
All carriers, with the exception of Pacific Insurance Company Ltd. ("Pacific"), are admitted
carriers in the State of California. This means that if any of these carriers were to become
insolvent, then the City would have the benefit of the California Guarantee Fund to pay all
covered claims made during the policy period. Although Pacific is not "admitted", Pacific has
a rating of A + XV, which classifies the company as a superior performer (A + ), and as one of
the largest insurance carriers in financial size (XV). Additionally, since Pacific Insurance
Company Ltd. is a subsidiary of ITT/Hartford Insurance, Pacific has the financial backing of
one of the major insurance carriers in the nation. Therefore, the City's risk is minimal in using
Pacific for earthquake and flood insurance.
The attached proposals summarize the premium and coverage provided by Reliance, Pacific
Insurance Company Ltd./Agricultural Insurance (earthquake and flood), and Hartford Steam
Boiler.
FISCAL IMPACT: Upon the appropriation of 926,600 from the Insurance Internal
Service Fund Retained Earnings, funds in the amount of 973,260 will be available in the
General Fund Property Insurance Account 300-199-999-5204.
Attachments:
1. Reliance Proposal Summary
2. Earthquake Coverage to be Provided
3. Hartford Steam Boiler Proposal Summary
RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY PROPOSAL SUMMARY
TERM: February 26, 1996- February 26, 1997
FORMAT: Occurrence
NAMED INSURED: City of Temecula
BLANKET PROPERTY COVERAGE
ALL
LOCATION
BUILDING LIMIT
$9,438,000
CONTENTS LIMIT
$1,160,000
DEDUCTIBLE
5,000 per
occurrerIc6
OPTIONAL COVERAGE INCLUDED:
COVERAGE
Debris Removal
Pollutant Cleanup and
Removal
Preservation of Property
Fire Department Service
Charge
Newly Acquired Property
Newly Acquired Personal
Property
Building Property Off
Premises
Broadened Building
Architect Fees
Paved Surfaces
Building Owner
Glass
Lawns, Trees, Shrubs, and
Plants
Recharging
Detached Outdoor Signs
Incidental Locations
Personal Effects
Transit
LIABILITY LIMIT
$10,000
$10,000
Properly Limit
Property Limit
$1,000,000
$500,000
$10,000
Property Limit
Property Limit
Property Limit
Property Limit
Property Limit
$2,000
Property. Limit
$10,000
$10,000
$10,000
$5,000
DEDUCTIBLE
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
N/A
N/A
$5,000
N/A
$250
N/A
N/A
$100
$5,000
$100
$250
Attachment 1
Brands and Labels
Water Damage
Arson Reward
Crime Reward
Change in Temperature
Valuable Papers
Accounts Receivable
Jewelry and Watches .
Fur and Fur Garments
Patterns, Dies and Molds
Extra Expense
Water Backup
Money and Securities
Media
Fine Arts
Breakage for Fine Arts
Inventory or Appraisal Cost
Loss Adjustment
Ordinance or Law -
Coverage A
Ordinance or Law -
Coverage B
Ordinance or Law-
Coverage C
Off Premises Services
(Direct Damage)
Property Limit
Property Limit
95,000
91,500
925,000
91,050,000
925,000
$2,500
$2,500
Property Limit
Property Limit
Property Limit
$5,000
$25,000
925,000
Not Covered
910,000
Property Limit
9500,000
9500,000
9500,000
Not Covered
95,000
95,000
N/A
N/A
9250
91,000
N/A
9100
9100
95,000
N/A
$5,000
N/A
95,000
95,000
N/A
N/A
N/A
95,000
95,000
$5,000
N/A
INLAND MARINE COVERAGE PROVIDED BY RELIANCE
ELECTRONIC DATA PROCESSING EQUIPMENT (EDP)
OCCURRENCE LIMIT:
DEDUCTIBLE:
COINSURANCE:
VALUATION:
COMPUTERS/PERIPHERAL DEVICES LIMIT:
$641,600
$500
Agreed Value
Replacement Cost
$375,900
COVERAGE
Air Conditioning Damage
Discharge of Extinguishing
Agents
Duplicate Software
Extra Expense
Flood and Water Damage
Incompatibility of Software
Laptop and Portable
Equipment
New Acquired Locations
Software
Transfer Between Locations
Transit
LIMIT
Property Limit
$5,000
$50,000
$50,000
Not Covered
$5,000
$5,000
$500,000
$175,700
$500,000
$10,000
DEDUCTIBLE
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
OTHER INLAND MARINE COVERAGE PROVIDED BY RELIANCE
OCCURRENCE LIMIT:
DEDUCTIBLE:
COINSURANCE:
VALUATION:
$441,020
$1,000
Agreed Amount
Actual Cash Value
SCHEDULED EQUIPMENT:
1991 Massey Ferguson Trailer
2 Utility Trailers
1992 Flexo Arrow Trailer
Speed Limit Sign'
$31,500
$7,910
$5,500
$10,000
COVERAGE
Borrowed Property on Any
One Item
Employee Tools and
Clothing/Any One Employee
Misc Tools and Equipment
Any One Item
Newly Acquired Property
Rental Reimbursement
Valuable Papers and
Records
Mobile/Communication
Equipment
Office Equipment
Scheduled Equipment
Additional Newly Acquired
Equipment/Property
LIMIT
$1,500
$ 5,000/$1,000
$1,000
$500
$25,000
$10,000
$1,050,000
$236,510
133,600
$55,910
$15,000
DEDUCTIBLE
$500
$500
$500
$500
$500
$5,000
$1,000
$1,000
$1,000
$1,000
EARTHQUAKE COVERAGE TO BE PROVIDED BY PACIFIC INSURANCE
COMPANY, LTD. AND AGRICULTURAL INSURANCE COMPANY
PERILS INSURED:
INTERESTS COVERED:
LIMITS OF LIABILITY:
DEDUCTIBLES:
EXCLUSIONS:
VALUATION:
Earthquake and flood, and perils resulting in difference in
conditions.
Buildings, contents, extra expense, valuable papers, electronic
data processing (EDP) hardware and software, and EDP extra
expense.
$10,000,000 per occurrence, with separate annual aggregate
with respect to earthquake and flood. The first $5 million is
provided by Pacific, and the supplemental $5 million is provided
by Agricultural.
10% per unit of insurance, including time element as a unit
$100,000 minimum per occurrence for earthquake
$50,000 per occurrence for flood
$25,000 per occurrence - all other perils
Pollution, contamination, theft, asbestos
Replacement cost, except actual loss sustained on extra expense.
Attachment 2
HARTFORD STEAM BOILER INSURANCE PROPOSAL SUMMARY
BOILER & MACHINERY COVERAGE
OBJECTS COVERED:
Pressure and Refrigeration Objects
Mechanical Objects
Electrical Objects
Comprehensive Excluding Production Machinery
COVERAGE
Direct Damage
Expediting Expense
LIMIT
$3,500,000
$5,000
DEDUCTIBLE
$1,000
$1,000
Attachment 3
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY ATTOR~EPYPROV/~3/'~
DIRECTOR OF F A ~
CITY MANAGE;:k~
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
PI nn
Gary Thornhill, Director. of a ing,~'7'
February 13, 1996
Direction on Pending Council Request
Prepared By:
David W. Hogan, Senior Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council direct staff to discontinue development of a tree ordinance.
BACKGROUND
In recent months, the Council has expressed concern that the City may not be able to limit the
removal of mature trees in conjunction with a development project. As a result, the Council
directed Staff to investigate the need for a tree preservation ordinance to protect mature and
significant trees in the community.
DISCUSSION
Based upon the Council's direction, staff reviewed the two different approaches used to
protect mature and locally significant trees. The two primary approaches used to protect local
trees 8r6:
1. The adoption of a specific preservation and protection ordinance; and,
2. The use of the General Plan and development review process.
In most circumstances, the development review process can protect mature trees in the
community. The only limitation in using the development review process to protect mature
and significant trees is that it does not prevent a property owner from independently removing
or topping (excessively trimming) a tree independent of a development project. If the Council
wishes to provide additional protection for mature and significant trees outside of the
development review process, then adoption of a specific ordinance would probably be
necessary.
CONCLUSION
Based upon our evaluation of the issue, it is staff's opinion that the current development
review process is capable of adequately protecting local trees. As a result, staff recommends
that the Council direct staff to not prepare a Citywide tree ordinance.
R:~HOGAND\TREEORD1.CC 1/29/96 dwh
ITEM 8
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
· APPROVAL
CITY ATTORN~~
DIR. OF FIN
CITY MANAG
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
Genie Roberrs, Director of Finance
February 13, 1996
Out-of-State Travel
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council authorize certain out-of-state travel plans.
DISCUSSION: The City's travel policy requires council authorization for all out-of-state
travel. Approval for the following out-of-state travel is requested as outlined below:
EST.
ATTENDEE LOCATION PURPOSE DATE COST
Det. Paul
Brinkman &
Det. Mark
Cordova
Reno, Nevada 24th Annual Robbery February 1996 $570
Investigators Association
Training Seminar
Ron Roberrs Washington, D.C. National League of Cities March 1996 $2,000
Annual Congressional
Conference
The 24th Annual Robbery Investigator's Association Training Seminar being held in Reno, NV
is the only seminar directed solely to police investigators in the robbery division. This request
includes training, hotel and airfare for two detectivej. The training will provide a valuable
opportunity for investigators to communicate and gain insight from other detectives in this
specialty area.
The Annual Congressional Conference is an enrichment conference with sessions addressing
Policy Committee meetings, steering committes, legislative workshops, state municipal league
briefings and meetings with congressional delegates. The City of Temecula has sent delegates
in the past and it proved to be beneficial and provided valuable information to conference
attendees.
R:tNORTONLtAGENDASIOSTRDC. AGN 01/12/96
FISCAL IMPACT: The funds for the National League of Cities Annual Congressional Conf.
will be charged to account number 001-100-999-5258. The Robbery Investigators Training
Seminar will be charged to account number 001-170-999-5261.
R:INORTONLtAGENDASIOSTRDC, AGN 01/12/96
ITEM 9
APPROVAL
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council
City Manager ~---~r/
February 13, 1996
Resolution Finding Benefit to the Community from the Statewide School
Facilities General Obligation Bond
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION 96-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA FINDING
SUBSTANTIAL BENEFIT TO THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY FROM THE
STATEWIDE SCHOOL FACILITIES GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND
BACKGROUND:
On February 1, 1996 Mayor Lindemans and I met with Barbara Tooker and Dr. Patricia
Novotney of the Temecula Valley Unified School District to discuss school financing in the
State of California. Ms. Tooker requested that the City join the School District in a statement
of support for a Statewide School Facilities General Obligation Bond. Such a proposal, now
known as Proposition 203, will appear on the March 26, 1966 ballot.
Attachment: Resolution
RESOLUTION 96-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA FINDING SUBSTANTIAL BENEFIT TO THE TEMECULA
COMMUNITY FROM THE STATEWIDE SCHOOL FACILITIES
GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND
WHEREAS, California's school population is growing by an average of 160,000
students each year creating a need for more classrooms so that students will have an
opportunity to learn in an educationally appropriate environment; and
Wt!F~RE&S, Statewide School Facility Bond Measure Proposition 203 will provide
$3 billion in State funds for Kindergarten through University; and
WHEREAS, The City of Temecula has gone from a population of 27,000 in 1990 to
its current population of 41,000, approximately 955 average rate of increase per year, during
this 5 year City period; and
WHEREAS, The Temecula Valley Unified School District enrollment has gone from
1,200 students in 1985/86 to 12,500 students in 1995/96, exceeding 10% average rate of
increase per year, during this 10 year District period; and
WIW~REAS, The City of Temecula and County of Riverside have approved General
Plans containing quantifies of new residential units which will bring more than 20,000 new
students to the district, creating the need for more than 20 new Temecula Valley Unified
School District schools over the next 10-20 years; and
WHEREAS, Temecula Valley Unified School District .will not receive any more State
funds for school construction unless future Bond measures such as Proposition 203 are passed
by State voters; and
WHEREAS, the lack of adequate school facilities hurts the quality of education in
our communities; and
WHEREAS, building needed schools will create as many as 50,000 jobs statewide
for every 120 schools built in the State; and
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Temecula
that the Statewide School Facility Bond Measure Proposition 203 which is on the March 26,
1996 ballot will provide substantial benefits which are necessary for this community.
Re,off95 I
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 3 day of February, 1996.
Karel F. Lindemans, Mayor
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, hne S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that
Resolution No. 96-_ was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the __th day of February, 1996, by the
following vote:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
CO~CILMEMBERS:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMF~MBERS:
June S. Greek, CMC
City Clerk
Resos\95 2
ITEM 10
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
FINANCE DIRECT~a~'~
CITY MANAGER ~ ~,
CITY OF TEMECL LA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Enginee[
February 13, 1996
Release Faithful Performance Warranty, Labor and Material, and
Monument bonds in Tract No. 20703-1. (Easterly of intersection of
Roripaugh Road at Winchester Road)
PREPARED BY:/~ Steven W. Cresswell, Principal Engineer /~Albert Crisp, Permit Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council AUTHORIZE the release of Faithful Performance Warranty and Labor and
Material bonds for Street, Water and Sewer Improvements, and Subdivision Monumentation
bonds in Tract No. 20703-1, and DIRECT the City Clerk to so advise the Clerk of the Board
of Supervisors, the developer, and surety.
BACKGROUND:
On December 22, 1987, the Riverside County Board of Supervisors entered into subdivision
agreements with:
DAV-BAR I, a California Partnership
c/o Coscan Davidson Homes
12865 Pointe Del Mar
Del Mar, CA 92014
for the improvement of streets and drainage, installation of sewer and water systems, and
subdivision monumentation. Accompanying the subdivision agreements were surety bonds
issued by The American Insurance Company as follows:
1. Bond No. 713 1951 in the amount of $446,000to cover street improvements.
2. BondNo. 7131952 in the amount of $121,500to cover water system improvements.
3. Bond No. 713 1953 in the amount of $80,500 to cover sewer system improvements.
4. BondsNo. 7131951, 7131952, and 7131953 in the amount of $223,000, $60,750,
and $40,250, respectively, to cover material and labor for street, water, and sewer
improvements.
5. Bond No. 713 1954 in the amount of $10,000 to cover subdivision monumentation.
n\agdrpt\96\0213\tr207031 .fnl
On August 27, 1991, the City Council accepted the public improvements, initiated the one-
year warranty period, and authorized the reduction in Faithful Performance bond amounts for
warranty purposes to the following amounts:
Street Improvements:
Water System Improvements:
Sewer System Improvements:
$44,600
12,150
8,050
Public Works Staff has reviewed the project and all necessary repairs/replacements have been
satisfactorily completed. The subdivision Monumentation was also inspected and verified.
Therefore Staff recommends the release of the Faithful Performance Warranty bonds and the
following Subdivision Monumentation bond:
Subdivision Monumentation:
Bond No. 713 1954
$10,000
The developer was required to post Material and Labor Bonds to ensure payment to suppliers
and workers. These bonds are maintained in effect for a period of time determined by statute
after the Governmental Agency has accepted the public improvements. The contractual claim
period having run and no claims have been filed with the City, therefore Staff recommends
that the following Labor and Material bonds be released:
Street Improvements:
Water System Improvements:
Sewer System Improvements:
Bond No. 173 1951
Bond No. 173 1952
Bond No. 173 1953
$223,000
60,750
40,250
The affected streets are being accepted into the City Maintained-Street System by City Council
Resolution No. 96- at this time. The streets within the subdivision are June Court, Canary
Circle, Linnitt Circle, Terrill Court, Warbler Circle, and portions of Jon Christian Place, Nicolas
Road, and Roripaugh Road. Nicolas Road was previously accepted into the County Maintained-
Road System and became part of the City Maintained-Street System upon incorporation.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
Attachment:
Location Map
r:\agdrpt\96\0213\tr207031 .fnl
rE N ICOLAS
r~.~.
~' ~v~ '% _.
'ROAD
I L/:"i
'.": ;:.'..". ~,~N . J" ~ CNnlS+i~N5
;~eol.~ ~
VICINITY MAP
TRACT NO. 20703-1
Location Map
NOTE: MAPS NOT TO SCALE
ITEM 11
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
FINANCE DIRECT '~--
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECL LA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Enginee[.
February 13, 1996
Accept Public Improvements in Tract No. 20703-2
(Easterly of intersection of Roripaugh Road at Winchester Road)
PREPARED BY://///' Steven W. Cresswell, Principal Engineer
' Albert Crisp, Permit Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council ACCEPT the Public Improvements in Tract No. 20703-2, AUTHORIZE
the reduction in Faithful Performance Street, and Water and Sewer Bond amounts and the
release of the Subdivision Monumentation Bond, ACCEPT the Faithful Performance Warranty
Bond Riders, APPROVE the subdivision agreement rider, and DIRECT the City Clerk to so
advise the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, the developer and surety.
BACKGROUND:
On June 14, 1988, the Riverside County Board of Supervisors entered into subdivision
agreements with:
Barratt American Incorporated,
c/o Coscan Davidson Homes
12865 Pointe Del Mar
Del Mar, CA 92014
for the improvement of streets, installation of sewer and water systems, and subdivision
monumentation in Tract No. 20703-2. Accompanying the subdivision agreements were surety
bonds issued by The American Insurance Company as follows:
1. Bond No. 11126948501 in the amount of $623,500to cover street improvements.
2. Bond No. 11126948519 in the amount of $168,000 to cover water system
improvements.
Bond No. 11126948527 in the amount of $166,000 to cover sewer system
improvements.
Bonds No. 11126948501, 11126948519, and 11126948527 in the amount of
$311,750, $84,400, and $83,000, respectively, to cover material and labor for street,
water, and sewer improvements.
r:\agdrpt\96\0213\tr20?O32.acc
5. Bond No. 11126948535 in the amount of ,27,000 to cover subdivision
monumentation.
The following items have been completed by the developer in accordance with the approved
plans:
1. Street, and sewer and water improvements within Tract No. 20703-2.
2. Subdivision Monumentation.
Staff has inspected and verified the public improvements including the subdivision
monumentation. The Rancho California and Eastern Municipal Water Districts have accepted
their items of work. The Public Works Department therefore recommends acceptance of the
work, reduction in bond amounts to the I O-percent warranty level, and initiation of the one-
year warranty period.
Therefore, it is appropriate to reduce the Faithful Performance Bond amounts as follows:
Street Improvements:
Water System Improvements:
Sewer System Improvements:
,561,150
,151,200
,149,400
and to release the following bond:
Subdivision Monumentation:
Bond No. 1112694835
,27,000
The subdivider is submitting riders to the Faithful Performance Bonds changing the obligee'
from the County of Riverside to the City of Temecula and reducing the bonds for warranty
purposes in the following amounts:
Streets and Drainage improvements:
Water System Improvements:
Sewer System Improvements:
Bond No. 11126948501
Bond No. 11126948519
Bond No. 11126948527
,62,350
,16,800
,16,600
The developer was required to post Material and Labor Bonds to ensure payment to suppliers
and workers. These bonds are maintained in effect for a period of time determined by statute
after the Governmental Agency has accepted the public improvements.
The affected streets are being accepted into the City Maintained-Street System by City Council
Resolution No. 96- at this time. The streets within the subdivision are Jimson Circle, Aralia
Court, Lark Court, Mimulus Way, Sanderling Way, and portions of Winchester Road, Swallow
Court, Starling Street, Senna Court, and Roripaugh Road. Winchester Road is already included
in the State Highway Maintenance System.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
ATTACHMENTS:
Location Map
Riders to Public Improvement Bonds (on file)
Subdivision Agreement Rider(on file)
r: \agdrpt%96~0213\tr207032. acc
.VICINITY MAP
TRACT NO.
20703-2
Location Map
NOTE: MAPS NOT TO SCALE
ITEM 12
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL '
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
February 13, 1996
Release the Public Improvement Warranty, Labor and Material, and
Monument Bonds in Tract No. 22786. (Southwesterly of intersection of
Nicolas Road at North General Kearny Road)
PREPARED BY: ,////Steven W. Cresswell, Principal Engineer
,~ Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council AUTHORIZE the release of the Subdivision Monumentation, Faithful
Performance Warranty, and Labor and Material Bonds, in Tract No 22786, and DIRECT the
City Clerk to so advise the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, Surety, and Developer.
BACKGROUND:
On July 25, 1989, the Riverside County Board of Supervisors approved Tract Map No. 22786,
and entered into subdivision agreements with:
Barratt American Incorporated
c/o Coscan Davidson
12865 Pointe Del Mar
Del Mar, CA 92014
for the improvement of streets, installation of water and sewer systems, and subdivision
monumentation. Bonds were posted for these items by The American Insurance Company as
follows:
1. Bond No. 11141296654in the amount of $244,500 to cover street improvements
2. Bond No. 11141296662in the amount $34,500to cover water system
improvements.
3. Bond No. 11141296670 in the amount of $42,000 to cover sewer system
improvements.
4. Bonds No. 11141296654, 11141296662, and 11141296670 in the amounts of
$122,500, $17,250, and $21,000 respectively to cover labor and material.
-1- r:\agdrpt\96\O213\tr22786f. inl
5. Bond No. 11141296688 in the amount of $11,500to cover subdivision
monumentation.
By City Council action on August 27, 1991, the improvements for this project were accepted,
the warranty period initiated, and Faithful Performance Warranty bonds were submitted in the
following amounts:
Street Improvements:
Water System Improvements:
Sewer System Improvements:
Bond No. 11141296654
Bond No. 11141296662
Bond No. 11141296670
$24,450
3,450
4,200
Public Works Staff has reviewed the project including the subdivision monumentation, and all
necessary repairs/replacements have been satisfactorily completed. The Public Works
Department therefore recommends the release of the Faithful Performance Warranty Bonds
and the following Subdivision Monumentation Bond:
Subdivision Monumentation:
Bond No. 11141296688
$11,500
Labor and Material Bonds are posted-to assure payment to material and labor suppliers. The
lien period following City Council project acceptance has expired with no claims having been
filed. Therefore the Public Works Department also recommends the release of the Labor and
Material bonds as follows:
Street Improvements:
Water System Improvements:
Sewer System Improvements:
Bond No. 11141296654
Bond No. 11141296662
Bond No. 11141296670
$122,500
$17,250
$21,000
The affected streets are Tanager Circle, and portions of Jon Christian Place, Nicolas Road, and
North General Kearny Road. Nicolas Road was a County Maintained Road prior to incorporation
and became a part of the City maintained-Street System by succession. The other streets will
be accepted into the City Maintained-Street System by Resolution 96- at this time.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
Attachment:
Location Map
-2- r:\agdrpt\96\O213\tr22786Linl
(..¢da 's.t ~'s.'d"
,LOT
I0
/
/
/
project Site
,,~ ~
.,~,~ PROJHCT
C,ALIFOIvNIA
.
4l \
VICINITY NAP
TRACT NO. 22786
Location Map
NOTE: MAPS NOT TO SCALE
ITEM 13
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL RY~
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE DIREC 0
CITY MANAGE
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
oseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
:
February 13, 1996
Accept Public Improvements in Tract No. 23126.
(Southerly of Intersection of Nicolas Road at Roripaugh Road)
PREPARED BY://'~,- Steven W. Cresswell, Principal Engineer
~ Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council ACCEPT the Public Improvements in Tract No. 23126, AUTHORIZE the
reduction in Faithful Performance Street, Drainage, and Water and Sewer Bond amounts and
the release of the Subdivision Monumentat, on Bond, ACCEPT the Faithful Performance
Warranty Bond Riders, APPROVE the subdivision agreement rider, and DIRECT the City Clerk
to so advise the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, the developer and surety.
BACKGROUND:
On November 7, 1989, the Riverside County Board of Supervisors entered into subdivision
agreements with:
Barratt American Incorporated,
c/o Coscan Davidson Homes
12865 Pointe Del Mar
Del Mar, CA 92014
for the improvement of streets, installation of sewer and water systems, and subdivision
monumentat,on. Accompanying the subdivision agreements were surety bonds issued by The
American Insurance Company as follows:
1. Bond No. 11127029103in the amount of $111,500 to cover street improvements.
2. Bond No. 11127029111 in the amount of $22,000 to cover water system
improvements.
3. Bond No. 11127029129 in the amount of $24,000 to cover sewer system
improvements.
Bonds No. 11127029103, 11127029111, and 11127029129 in the amount of
$55,750, ~11,000, and ~12,000, respectively, to cover material and labor for street,
water, and sewer improvements.
r:\agdrpt\96\0213\tr23126a.cep
5. Bond No. 11127029137in the amount of $9,800to cover subdivision monumentation.
The following items have been completed by the developer in accordance with the approved
plans:
1. Street, drainage, sewer and water improvements within Tract No. 23126.
2. Subdivision Monumentation.
Staff has inspected and verified the public improvements including the subdivision
monumentation. The Rancho California and Eastern Municipal Water Districts have accepted
their items of work. The Public Works Department therefore recommends release of the
monumentation bond, acceptance of the public improvements, reduction in bond amounts to
the 1 O-percent warranty level, and initiation of the one-year warranty period.
Therefore, it is appropriate to reduce the Faithful Performance Bond amounts as follows;
Street Improvements:
Water System Improvements:
Sewer System Improvements:
100,350
$19,800
$21,600
and to release the following bond:
Subdivision Monumentation:
Bond No. 11126948741
$9,800
The subdivider is submitting riders to the Faithful Performance Bonds changing the obligee'
from the County of Riverside to the City of Temecula and reducing the bonds for warranty
purposes in the following amounts:
Streets and Drainage improvements:
Sewer System Improvements:
Water System Improvements:
Bond No. 11127029103
Bond No. 11127029111
Bond No. 11127029129
$11,150
$ 2,200
$ 2,400
The developer was required to post Material and Labor Bonds to ensure payment to suppliers
and workers. These bonds are maintained in effect for a period of time determined by statute
after the Governmental Agency has accepted the public improvements.
The affected street is being accepted into the City Maintained-Street System by City Council
Resolution No. 96- at this time. The street within the subdivision to be accepted is Sweet
Brier Circle.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
ATTACHMENTS:
Location Map
Riders to Public Improvement Bonds (on file)
Subdivision Agreement Rider (on file)
r:~agdrpt\96\0213\tr23126a.cep
0AO
v
/3
xe,
/ ~
,.,\
L ~ ,,,~,~ PROJECT
VZCZNZ TY klAP
TRACT NO.
23126
Location Map
NOTE: MAPS NOT TO SCALE
ITEM 14
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
:APPROVAL '
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE DIREC
CITY MANAGE
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
J.oseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
February 13, 1996
Acceptance of Public Streets into the City Maintained-Street System
(Within Tracts No. 19939-1,-2, and -F) (Northwesterly of intersection
of Pala Road at Via Eduardo)
PREPARED BY'./~ Steven W. Cresswell, Principal Engineer
7~- Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer.
RECOMMENDATION: City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 96-_
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC
STREETS INTO THE CITY MAINTAINED-STREET SYSTEM
(WITHIN TRACTS NO. 19939-1,-2, AND -F)
BACKGROUND:
The Riverside County Board of Supervisors approved TraCt Maps No. 19939-1 and 19939-2
on June 16, 1987 and approved Tract Map No. 19939-F on July 21, 1987, and entered into
subdivision agreements with Joshua-Towne Homes for street, water and sewer improvements.
On March 12, 1990, April 15, 1991, and April 15, 1991, respectively, the County of Riverside
accepted the improvements, reduced the faithful performance bonds for warranty purposes,
and initiated the warranty period. The City Council released the Subdivision Monumentation
bonds for all three tracts on July 23, 1991, and the Labor and Material and Faithful
Performance Warranty securities for all three tracts on April 28, 1992.
The public streets recommended for acceptance are as follows:
Tract No. 19939-1: Hiawatha Court, Bocaw Circle, Saho Court, Eona Circle, Pashaho
Street, Kimo Street, and portions of Huron Street, Piute Street, Lahontan Street, Shaba
Circle, and Via Gilberto.
Tract No. 19939-2: Parsippany Court, Arabasca Circle, Bandan Court, Jeronimo Street,
Hopactong Street, Pahuta Street, and portions of Via Eduardo, Piute Street, Lahontan
Street, Huron Street, Washana Court, and Alehzon Circle.
r:\agdrpt\96\0213\tr19939a.lst
Tract No. 19939-F: Portions of Via Eduardo, Washana Court, Alehzon Circle, Lahontan
Street, Shaba Circle, and Via Gilberto.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Periodic surface and/or structural maintenance will be required every 5 to 8 years.
Attachments:
Resolution No. 96- with Exhibits "A-B", inclusive.
r:\agdrpt\96\0213\tr19939a.lst
RESOLUTION NO. 96-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC
STREETS INTO THE CITY MAINTAINED-STREET SYSTEM
(WITHIN TRACTS NO. 19939-1,-2, AND F)
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER
AS FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, The County of Riverside accepted an offer of dedication of certain lots
for public road and public utility purposes made by Joshua-Towne Homes, a California
Corporation, with the recordation of Tract Maps No. 19939-1, -2, and -F; and,
WHEREAS, The County of Riverside accepted the improvements as complete within
Tracts No. 19939-1 on March 12, 1990, and Tracts No. 19939-2 and 19939-F on April 15,
1991.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Temecula
hereby accepts into the City Maintained-Street System those streets or portions of streets
offered to and accepted by the County of Riverside described in Exhibits "A" and "B" attached
hereto.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at
a regular meeting held on the 13th day of February, 1996.
Karel F. Lindemans, Mayor
ATTEST:
June S. Greek
City Clerk
[SEAL]
r:\agdrpt\96\0213\tr19939a.lst
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that
Resolution No. 96- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 13th day of February, 1996, by the
following vote:
AYES: 0
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 0
ABSTAIN: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
r:\agdrpt\96\0213\tr19939a.lst
EXHIBIT "A" TO RESOLUTION NO. 95-
Accepting the public streets offered to and
accepted by the County of Riverside as indicated
on Tract Maps No. 19939-1,-2, and -F, and
accepting subject public streets into the City
Maintained-Street System as described below:
1. Those lots described as Lots "A" through "L" inclusive,
as shown on Tract Map No. 19939-1, filed 17 June 1987, in
Book 170 of Maps, Pgs 1-4 Incl., further described as
follows:
Lot "A" Portion of Huron Street
Lots "B" & "K" Portions of Piute Street
Lot "C" Hiawatha Court
Lot "D" Bocaw Circle
Lot "E" Portion of Lahontan Street
Lot "F" Pashaho Street
Lot "G" Saho Court
Lot "H" Portion of Via Gilberto
Lot "1" Eona Circle
Lot "J" Kimo Street
Lot "L" Portion of Shaba Circle
2. Those lots described as Lots "A" through "M" inclusive,
as shown on Tract Map No. 19939-2, filed 17 June 1987, in
Book 170 of Maps, Pgs 5-9 Incl., further described as
follows:
Lot "A"
Lot "B"
Lots "C" & "K"
Lot "D"
Lot "E"
Lot "F"
Lot "G"
Lot "H"
Lot "I"
Lot "J"
Lot "L"
Lot "M"
Portion of Via Eduardo
Parsippany Court
Pahuta Street
Jeronimo Street
Hopactong Street
Portion of Lahontan Street
Portion of Huron Street
Arabasca Circle
Bandan Court
Portion of Piute Street
Portion of Washana Court
Portion of Alehzon Circle
3. Those lots described as-Lots "A" through "F" inclusive,
as shown on Tract Map No. 19939-Fo filed 7 August 1987, in
Book 171, Pgs 92-97 Incl., further described as
follows:
Lot "A"
Lot "B"
Lot "C"
Lot "D"
Lot "E"
Lot "F"
Portion of Via Eduardo
Portion of Washana Court
Portion of Alehzon Circle
Portion of Lahontan Street
Portion of Shaba Circle
Portion of Via Gilberto
r:\agdrpt\96\0213\tr19939a.lst
EXHIBIT "B" TO RESOLUTION NO. 96-
SUBJECT ACCEPTANCE- PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY
MAINTAINED-STREET SYSTEM AS INDICATED BELOW:
pAI, A~UI
~O PI1
N 4"r'44'·e'W
"""' 10·1.1·' (1 lleJo'}
1~. PSLA - ~ U;n'a/ /f~ /1~ / //~
I ~, as
· IIL I
~ I 2. 2s 1s f~ ·
22 ~ S
k \ 3
3e
I
83
82
67
el
66 02
64 63
~ 10 1 32 35
e 1~ 31 36
~ ~ 8 15 30
~ d 7 16 29 38
,7283.
5 21 40
~ 10 26
4
/ 3 20 25 42
2 21 24 43
~ I 22
32e'2
112
114
118
47
-- 102
101
100
19 120 121
P ~ lilt,IT
!
2 O 12 '~
23
3 , e 13
4 I 14 24
88
66 86
66 85
63
10 ----"----- 84
67
-- 82
11 83
88
el 82
13 751 77
1
89~ 88
122 130 131 132'
54
66
66
51
VIA
i63 644
71 72 73 74
68
el
60
60
86
t
LOT 87
FOR LOT 87 O~TAIJ
·
ODEI8A
lOAD
lOT O
1' IAR
. ·TRIP
LEGEND
STREETS OR PORTIONS OF STREETS
TO BE ACCEPTED INTO CITY
MAINTA/NED-STREET SYSTEM
NOTE: MAPS NOT TO SCALE
VICINITY MAP
ITEM 15
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
i~Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
February 13, 1996
Acceptance of Public Streets into the City-Maintained Street System
(Within Tracts No. 20703-2, and 23126). (Southeasterly of intersection
of Winchester Road at Roripaugh Road)
PREPARED BY://~' Steven W. Cresswell, Principal Engineer
Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer
RECOMMENDATION: City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 96---
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC
STREETS INTO THE CITY MAINTAINED-STREET SYSTEM
(WITHIN TRACTS NO. 20703-2 AND 23126)
BACKGROUND:
The Riverside County Board of Supervisors approved Tract Map No. 20703-2 on June 14,
1988, and Tract Map No. 23126 on November 7, 1989, and entered into subdivision
improvement agreements for the improvement of streets and drainage, and sewer and water
systems on those respective dates. On February 13, 1996, the City Council accepted the
improvements and initiated the warranty period for both Tracts.
These two projects were constructed by DAV-BAR I, a California General Partnership, (as to
Tract No. 20703-2)and DAV-BAR II, a California General Partnership (as to Tract No. 23126)
(Both General Partnerships comprised of Barratt American Incorporated, a Delaware
Corporation, and Davidson Pacific Ltd., a California Limited Partnership).
The affected public streets for these projects are respectively:
Tract No 20703-2: Jimson Circle, Lark Court, Mimulus Way, Aralia Court, Sanderling Way,
and portions of Roripaugh Road, Winchester Road, Starling Street, Swallow Court, and Senna
Court.
r:\agdrpt\96\0213\tr231267.032
Tract No. 23126: Sweet Brier Circle
Winchester Road is in the State Highway System. The rest of the affected public streets will
be accepted into the City Maintained-Street System under Resolution No. 96-
FISCAL IMPACT:
Periodic surface and/or structural maintenance will be required every 5 to 8 years.
ATTACHMENTS:
Resolution No. 96-
with Exhibits "A-B", inclusive.
r:\agdrpt\96\0213\tr231267.032
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA, CALWO~, ACCEPTING CERTAIN
STREETS INTO THE CITY-MAINTAINED STREET
SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACTS NO. 20703-1, AND ~786)
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE
AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, The County of Riverside accepted an offer of dedication of certain lots for
public road and public utility purposes made by with the recordation of Tract Maps No. 20703-
1, and 22786; and,
WHEREAS, The City of Temecula accepted the improvements within both Tracts No.
20703-1 and 22786 as complete on August 27, 1991.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the 'City Council of the City of
Temecula hereby accepts into the City Maintained-Street System those streets or portions of
streets offered to and accepted by the County of Riverside described in Exhibits "A" and "B"
attached hereto.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula
at a regular meeting held on the 13th day of February, 1996.
Karel F. Lindemans, Mayor
ATYEST:
June S. Oreek
City Clerk
[SEAL]
r:\agdrpt\96\0213\tr231267.032
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )
CITY OF TEMECULA )
SS
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify. that
Resolution No. 96- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 13th day of February, 1996, by the following
vote: . ·
AYES:
0 C OUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS:
r:\agdrpt\96\0213\tr231267.032
EXHIBIT "A" TO RESOLUTION NO. 96-
Accepting the public streets offered to and
accepted by the County of Riverside as indicated
on Tracts No. 20703-2, and 23126; and accepting
subject public streets into the City Maintained-
Street System as described below:
A. Those lots described as Lots "A" through "J" inclusive,
as shown on Tract Map No. 20703-2, ~ed 23 December, 1987,
in Book 185 of Maps, Pgs 37-44 Ind., further described
as follows:
Lot "A"#
Lot "B"
Lot "C"
Lot "D"
Lot "E"
Lot "F"
Lot "G"
Lot "H"
Lot "I"
Lot "J"
Portion of Winchester Road
Portion of Roripaugh Road
Portion of Starling Street
Jimson Circle
Mimulus Way
Lark Court
Aralia Court
Sanderling Way
Portion of Swallow Court
Portion of Senna Court
B. That lot described as Lot "A", as shown on Tract Map No. 23126,
f'ded 8 November, 1989, in Book 209 of Maps, Pgs 60-62, Incl.,
further described as follows:
Lot "A"
Sweet Brier Circle
# Street is within State Maintained-Highway System.
r:\agdrpt\96\0213\tr231267.032
EXHIBIT "B" TO RESOLUTION NO. 96-
SUBJECT ACCEPTANCE- PUBLIC STREETS INTO T. HE CITY
MAINTAINED-STREET SYSTEM AS INDICATED BELOW:
RA.t~C ~o
VICINITY MAP
LEGEND
STREETS OR PORTIONS OF STREETS
TO BE ACC]~PT~D IN'TO CITY
MA1NTA/NED-STR~ET SYSTEM
NOTE: MAPS NOT TO SCALE
ITEM 16
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL Rf~
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE DIREC
CITY MANAGE
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
February 13, 1996
Acceptance of Public Streets into the City Maintained-Street System
(Within Tracts No. 20703-1 and 22786). (Southwesterly of the
intersection of Nicolas Road at North General Kearny Road)
PREPARED BY://ll/Steven W. Cresswell, Principal Engineer
/~Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer
RECOMMENDATION: City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 96-_
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC
STREETS INTO THE CITY MAINTAINED-STREET SYSTEM
(WITHIN TRACTS NO. 20703-1 AND 22786)
BACKGROUND:
The Riverside County Board of Supervisors approved Tract No. 20703-1 on December 22,
1987, and Tract No. 22786 on July 25, 1989, and entered into Subdivision Agreements for
construction of street, water and sewer improvements with DAV-BAR I, a California
Partnership. The City Council accepted the public improvements for these two tracts on
August 27, 1991, and initiated the warranty period, and reduced Faithful Performance bond
amounts to the 10 % warranty level. The City Council released the Faithful Performance
Warranty, Labor and Material, and Subdivision Monumentation bonds on February 13, 1996.
The affected streets for these projects are respectively:
Tract No. 20703-1: June Court, Canary Circle, Linnitt Circle, Terrill Court, Warbler
Circle, and portions of Jon Christian Place, Nicolas Road, and Roripaugh Road.
Tract No. 22786: Tanager Circle, and portions of Nicolas Road, Jon Christian Place,
and North General Kearny Road.
Nicolas Road is already in the City Maintained-System by succession to the County of
Riverside.
r:\agd rpt\96\0213\tr227867.031
FISCAL IMPACT:
Periodic surface and/or structural maintenance will be required every 5 to 8 years.
Attachments:
Resolution No. 96- with Exhibits "A-B", inclusive.
r:~agdrpt\96\0213\tr227867.031
RESOLUTION NO. 96-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA, CAL~O~, ACCEPTING CERTAIN
PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY MAINTAINED-STREET
SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACTS NO. 20703-1 AND 22786)
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE
AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, The County of Riverside accepted offer of dedication of certain lots
for public road and public utility purposes made by DAV-BAR I, a California Partnership,
with the recordation of Tract Maps No. 20703-1 and 22786; and,
WHEREAS, The City of Temecula accepted the improvements within Tracts No. 20703-
and 22786 on August 27, 1991.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of
Temecula hereby accepts into the City Maintained-Street System those streets or portions of
streets offered to and accepted by the City of Temecula described in Exhibits "A" and "B"
attached hereto.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTEr}, by the City Council of the City of Temecula
at a regular meeting held on the 13th day of February, 1996.
ATTEST:
Karel F. Lindemans, Mayor
June S. Greek
City Clerk
r:\agdrpt\96\0213\tr227867.031
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )
CITY OF TEMECULA )
SS
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, dO hereby certify 'that
Resolution No. 96- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 13th day of February, 1996, by the following
vote:
AYES: 0
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 0
ABSTAIN: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
r:\agdrpt\96\0213\tr227867.031
EXHIBIT "A" TO RESOLUTION NO. 96-
Accepting the public streets offered to and accepted by the
County of Riverside as indicated on Tract Maps No. 20703-1
and 22786, and accepting subject public streets into the City
Maintained- Street System as described below:
A. Those lots described as Lots "A" through "H" inclusive, as
shown on Tract Map No. 20703-1, fried 23 December 1987, in
Book 177 of Maps, Pgs 72-76 Ind., further described as
follows:
Lot "A"*
Lot "B"
Lot "C"
Lot "D"
Lot "E"
Lot "F"
Lot "G"
Lot "H"
Portion of Nicolas Road
Portion of Roripaugh Road
Portion of Jon Christian Place
June Court
Canary Circle
Linnitt Circle
Terrill Court
Warbler Circle
B. Those lots described as Lot "A" through "D" inclusive, as
shown on Tract Map No. 22786, f'ded 28 July 1989, in Book
205 of Maps, Pgs 10-13 Ind., further described as follows:
Lot "A"*
Lot "B"
Lot "C"
Lot "D"
Portion of Nicolas Road
Portion of North General Kearny Road
Portion of Jon Christian Place
Tanager Circle
*Accepted by the County of Riverside into the County Maintained-Road System prior to
City incorporation on December 1, 1989, at which time it became a City Maintained Street
by succession.
r:\agdrpt\96\0213\tr227867.031
EXHIBIT "B" TO RESOLUTION NO. 96-__
SUBJECT ACCEPTANCE- PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY
MAINTAINED-STREET SYSTEM AS INDICATED BELOW:
NICOI, AS ROAD
k t,- k.
/
/
VICINITY MAP
LEGEND
STREETS OR PORTIONS OF STREETS
TO BE ACCEPTED INTO CITY
MLINTAINED-STREET SYSTEM
NOTE: MAPS NOT TO SCALE
ITEM 17
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL '
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
)~,C, Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
February 13, 1996
Acceptance of Public Streets into the City Maintained-Street System
(Within Tract No. 22208. (Northeasterly of Margarita Road at Solana
Way)
PREPARED BY://",e-Steven W. Cresswell, Principal Engineer
i~F~ Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer.
RECOMMENDATION:
City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 96-_
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC
STREETS INTO THE CITY MAINTAINED-STREET SYSTEM
(WITHIN TRACT NO. 22208)
BACKGROUND:
The Riverside County Board of Supervisors approved Tract No. 22208 on February 23, 1988,
and entered into subdivision agreements with Rancho Solana Associates, a California General
Partnership, for street, water and sewer improvements. On June 18, 1990, the County of
Riverside accepted the improvements, reduced the faithful performance bonds for warranty
purposes, and initiated the warranty period. The City Council released the Subdivision
Monumentation, and the Labor and Material and Faithful Performance Warranty bonds on April
28, 1992.
The public streets recommended for acceptance are Amwood Way, Shorewood Court,
Nightcrest Circle, Waynewood Drive, Deepwood Circle, and Marwood Circle.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Periodic surface and/or structural maintenance will be required every 5 to 8 years.
Attachments:
Resolution No..96- with Exhibits "A-B", inclusive.
r:\agdrpt\96\0213\tr22208c.mss
RESOLUTION NO. 96-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC
STREETS INTO THE CITY MAINTAINED-STREET SYSTEM
(WITHIN TRACT NO. 22208)
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER
AS FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, The County of Riverside accepted an offer of dedication of certain lots
for public road and public utility purposes made by Rancho Solana Associates, a California
General Partnership, with'the recordation of Tract Map No. 22208; and,
WHEREAS, The County of Riverside accepted the improvements within Tract No.
22208 as complete on June 18, 1990.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Temecula
hereby accepts into the City Maintained-Street System those streets or portions of streets
offered to and accepted by the County of Riverside described in Exhibits "A" and "B" attached
hereto.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at
a regular meeting held on the 13th day of February, 1996.
Karel F. Lindemans, Mayor
ATTEST:
June S. Greek
City Clerk
[SEAL]
r:\agdrpt\96\0213\tr22208c.mss
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that
Resolution No. 96- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 13th day of February, 1996, by the
following vote:
AYES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
r:\agdrpt\96\0213\tr22208c.mss
EXHIBIT "A" TO RESOLUTION NO. 96-
Accepting the public streets offered to and
accepted by the County of Riverside as indicated
on Tract Map No. 22208, and accepting subject
public streets into the City Maintained-Street
System as described below:
Those lots described as Lots "A" through "F" inclusive,
as shown on Tract Map No. 22208, filed 25 February 1988, in
Book 180 of Maps, Pgs 93-98 Incl., further described
as follows:
Lot "A"
Lot "B"
Lot "C"
Lot "D"
Lot "E"
Lot "F"
Amwood Way
Shorewood Court
Nightcrest Circle
Waynewood Drive
Deepwood Circle
Marwood Circle
r:\agdrpti96\0213\tr22208c.mss
EXHIBIT "B" TO RESOLUTION NO. 96-
SUBJECT ACCEPTANCE- PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY
MAINTAINED-STREET SYSTEM AS INDICATED BELOW:
I
STREETS OR K)RTION$ OF;
TO RE ACCE,lc~"ED ~ Cr'PC
MAg,~A,IHED-b"t"RE,w~ S'YS'Z'E~
3R
I8
ax a~ #~ a4
/
!
NOTE: MAPS NOT TO SCAT-F-
.~ ,3e
WC/N/TY MAP ~
ITEM 18
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
City Manager/City Council
FROM:
DATE:
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
February 13, 1996
SUBJECT: Award a Contract to Remove and Replace. Concrete and A.C. on
Commerce Center Drive, Public Works Maintenance -
Project No. PW95-96-17
PREPARED BY: 1~1~ Brad Buron, Maintenance Superintendent
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council award a contract to Maples and Associates to remove and replace
concrete and A.C. on Commerce Center Drive, 200 feet south of Enterprise Circle West at the
channel.
BACKGROUND:
In January, 1996 the Public Works Department, in conformance with the City's current
purchasing procedures requested proposals for a Public Works Maintenance Project No. PW95-
96-17. Eight (8) sealed bids were received for the following scope of work:
Remove and replace 530 Sq. Ft. of concrete, 215 L.Ft. of curb and gutter, install 1,770
Sq. Ft. of sidewalk, and 1,096 Sq. Ft. of A.C. on Commerce Center Drive, 200 feet
south of Enterprise Circle West at the channel.
The bids r~ceived is as follows:
Maples & Associates
KLM Engineering
Rancho Concrete, Inc.
Monteleone's Excavating, Murrieta
NPG Corporation
AMERC, Inc.
Farwest Concrete Const.
Allied Grading & Paving, Inc.
$13,853.15
$14,214.08
$14,587.00
$16,500.00
$17,041.00
$18,454.00
$18,692.50
$24,412.00
Maples and Associates has performed contract work in the past for the City of Temecula, and
we have found their work to be satisfactory. The costs are within the Engineer's estimate.
r:~agdtpt\96\0213 \channel .bid/nip
FISCAL IMPACT:
Funds are available in the Public Works Department Routine Street Maintenance, Account No.
100-164-601-5402for the proposed work on Commerce Center Drive.
Attachments:
Contract
r:~agdrpt\96\02 13\channd.bid/ajp
CITY OF TEMECULA
WORK ORDER//95-96-17
AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, made this 13th day of February. 1996, by and between the City
of Temecula ("City") a municipal corporation, duly organized and existing under and by virtue
of the laws of the State of California, and Maples and Associates hereinafter called
"Contractor". In consideration of their mutual promises contained herein, the parties agree as
follows:
1. The Contractor, in consideration of the promises of the City hereinafter set forth, hereby
agrees to furnish all tools, equipment, labor and materials necessary to perform and complete
in a workmanlike manner, all of the work required for the construction of the improvements
described in Work Order No.95-96-17 attached hereto. The work shall be performed according
to the City of Temecula's Procedures For Informal Bidding For Public Works Street
Maintenance Work Orders of $25.000 or Less. Fiscal Year 1995-96. ("Informal Bidding
Procedures").
Where the Work Order or the Informal Bidding Procedures describe portions of the work
in general terms, but not in complete detail, the latest version of the City of Temecula.
Department of Public Works Standards Drawings for Public Works Construction ("Standard
Drawings"), and Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, including all
supplements as written and promulgated by the Joint Cooperative Committee of the Southern
California Chapter of the American Associated General Contractors of California (hereinafter,
"Standard Specifications") shall control. Copies of the Standard Specifications are available
from the publisher:
Building News, Incorporated
3055 Overland Avenue
Los Angeles, California 90034
(213) 202-7775
In case of any conflict between the Standard Drawings and the Standard Specifications,
the Standard Drawings shall control. Where the Work Order, the Informal Bidding Procedures,
the Standard Drawings, or the Standard Specifications only describe portions of the work in
general terms, but not in complete detail, it is understood that the item is to be furnished and
installed completed and in place and that only the best general practice is to be used.
2. The City, in consideration of the performance of this Contract, agrees to pay the
Contractor and the Contractor agrees to accept in full satisfaction for the work done hereunder
the sum of Thirteen Thousand Eight Hundred Fifty-Three dollars and Fifteen Cents
($13.853.15), in accordance with the bid of the Contractor which sum shall be paid to the
Contractor within the time and in the manner set forth in the Informal Bidding Procedures, final
payment to be made within thirty-five (35) days after filing Notice of Completion of said work
and improvement with the Riverside County Recorder.
3. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor code of the State of California,
the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and the general rate
for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft, classification, or type of workman
needed to execute this Contract from the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations.
r: ~naint\96workor\95-96-17. oon/ajp
These rates are on file in the office of the City Clerk. Copies may be obtained at'cost at the
City Clerk's office in Temecula. Contractor shall post a copy of such wage rates at the job site
and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. Contractor shall comply with
the provisions Section 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.15, 1777.6, and 1813 of the labor Code.
Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, Contractor shall forfeit to the City,
as a penalty, the sum of $25.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each laborer,
worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any work done
under this Contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions
of the Contract.
4. Contractor, by executing the Contract, 'hereby certifies:
"I am aware of the provision of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which requires
every employer be insured against liability for Workman's Compensation or
undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and I
will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the
work of this Contract."
5. All work covered by this Contract done at the site of construction or in preparing or
delivering materials to the site, shall be at the risk of Contractor alone. Contractor agrees to
save, indemnify, hold harmless and defend City, its officers, employees, and agents, against any
and all liability, injuries, or death of persons (Contractor's employees included) and damage to
property, arising directly or indirectly out of the obligations herein undertaken or out of the
operations conducted by Principal, save and except claims or litigations arising through the sole
active negligence or sole willful misconduct of the City.
6. Contractor and subcontractors shall obtain all necessary licenses, including but not limited
to City business license.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City has caused its corporate name and seal to be hereunto
subscribed and affixed by the [Mayor/City Manager] and attested to by the City Clerk, both
thereunto duly authorized, and the Contractor has hereunto subscribed this Contract the day,
month and year hereinabove written.
By:
Name:
Title:
Maples and Associates
41419 Pear Street, #4
Murrieta, California 92562
r: knminfi96wo~ofi95-96-- 17. con/njp
CITY OF TEMECULA
Karel F. Lindemans, Mayor
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
(Date)
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
r: ~,maint\96workor\95-96-17. con/nip
PROJECT NO. 95-96-17
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT AND FINAL RELEASE
This is to certify that , (hereinafier the
"undersigned") declares to the City of Temecula, under oath, that it has paid in full for all materials,
supplies, labor, services, tools, equipment, and all other bills contracted for by the undersigned or by any
of the undersigned's agents, employees, or subcontractors used or in contribution to the execution of its
contract with the City of Temecula with regard to the building, erection, construction or repair of that
certain work improvement known as:
, situated in the Community of ,
The undersigned declares that it knows of no unpaid debts or claims arising out of said Contract
which would constitute grounds for any third party to claim a stop notice of any unpaid sums owning to
the undersigned.
Further, for valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the undersigned
does hereby fully release and acquit the City of Temecula and all agents and employees of the City, and
in favor of the undersigned and the City of Temecula or which relate in any way to work performed by
the undersigned with regard to the above referenced construction project.
Further, the undersigned expressly acknowledges its awareness of and waives the benefits of 1542
of the Civil Code of the State of California which provides: "A general release does not extend to claims
which the creditor does not know or suspect to exist in his favor at the time of executing the release,
which if known to him must have materially effected settlement with the debtor".
This release is intended to be a full and general release of any and all claims which the
undersigned now has or may, in the future, have against the City of Temecula and/or its agents and
employees with regard to any matter arising from the construction or the above referenced project or the
contract between the City and the Contractor with respect thereto whether such claims are now known
or unknown or are suspected or unsuspected.
Dated:
By:
(Name)
(Title)
r: ~int\96workofi95- 96-17. con/ajp
ITEM 19
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
t:-Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
February 13, 1996
Second Amendment to Employment Systems, Inc. Agreement to Provide
Inspection Services for the Winchester Interchange Project No. PW94-21
PREPARED BY: ~ Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council approve the Second Amendment to Employment Systems, Inc.
Agreement to provide Inspector Services for the Winchester Interchange Project No. PW94-21.
BACKGROUND:
The City entered into an agreement with Employment Systems, Inc. (ESI) on April 14, 1994
to provide supplemental building inspection services. Services are provided when temporally
vacated positions, during vacations and to supplement staff during peak work loads.
The Winchester Road at Interstate Route 15 Bridge Widening and Northbound Ramp
Improvements project will require inspection by the City as identified in the Construction
Cooperative Agreement with Caltrans. We have selected an inspector with specific knowledge
of this type of inspection work who which will include construction review of the installation
of the piles, construction of the bridge supports and the structural components of the bridge.
Mike Nichols has been selected to perform the inspection services. Mr. Nichols has inspected
similar Caltrans projects and is familiar with Caltrans construction methods and procedures.
Mr. Nichols has also been a resident of Temecula for the past five (5) years.
The second amendment has been reviewed as to form by the City Attorney.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Funds for inspection services have been allocated in the Capital Improvement Program for this
project. Inspection services will be paid for at the hourly rate set forth in Exhibit "A" of the
amendment.
ATTACHMENTS:
Second Amendment to Employment Systems, Inc.
-1- r.~agdrpt\96\O213\pw94-21.ins/ajp
SECOND AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT SYSTEMS, INC.
AGREEMENT TO PROVIDE STAFFING SERVICES
TO THE
CITY OF TEMECULA
THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT SYSTEMS, INC. AGREEMENT TO
PROVIDE STAFFING SERVICES TO THE CITY OF TEMECULA (HEREINAFrER "SECOND
AMENDMENT") is made and effective as of February 13, 1996 by and between the City of Temecula
("Agency") and Employment System, Inc. ("ESI"). In consideration of the mutual promises, covenants,
and warranties set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:
1. This Second Amendment is made with respect to the following facts which the parties
agree are true and correct:
A. On April 14, 1994, the Agency and ESI entered into that certain agreement
entitled "Employment Systems, Inc. Agreement to Provide Staffing Services to the City of Temecula"
("Agreement").
B. The parties now desire to extend the term of the Agreement until February 13,
1997, substitute certain employees and add new employees to the Agreement, and make certain other
changes in the Agreement.
2. Paragraph 2.2 of the Agreement is hereby mended to read as follows:
"2.2 Term of Agreement. This Agreement and the rights and obligations of AGENCY
and ESI shall commence on the effective time and date specified in paragraph 2.1 and shall expire and
terminate at the same time on February 13, 1997. The term of this Agreement may be extended only
by an agreement in writing, signed and executed by the parties hereto prior to such expiration. It is
specifically understood and agreed that AGENCY may not hold-over upon such expiration and may not
be or become lessee of the employees from term to term."
3. Article 5, Indemnification, of the Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows:
"ESI" shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless AGENCY for the purposes of all
required payroll deductions and withholdings, legally required workers' compensation insurance, and
health benefits of the employees. However, inasmuch as the employees will discharge governmental
responsibilities and perform in accordance with the ordinances, resolutions, rules, regulations, and
procedures adopted by AGENCY in its governmental capacity (1) ESI and its employees shall be entitled
to all protection and immunities of government employees, including without limitation, those provided
in California Government Code, Title I, Division 3.6, Claims and Actions Against Public Entities and
Public Employees; and (2) AGENCY does release and agree to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the
employees, ESI, and ESI's agents, personnel, directors, and officers from any and all actions, claims,
damages or injuries to persons or property, penalties, obligations, or liabilities arising out of or related
to the services performed under this Agreement."
4. Exhibit A, Staff, to the Agreement is hereby deleted from the Agreement and in its place
a new Exhibit A, Staff, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, is added to the
Agreement.
r: \cip\projecta\pw 94\pow94-21 \impcot2. ag dajp
5. Except as otherwise specifically provided herein, all other terms and conditions of the
Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this First Amendment to be executed
the day and year first above written.
EMPLOYMENT SYSTEMS, INC.
CITY OF TEMECULA
President
Karel F. Lindemans, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk ·
Approved'As to Form:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
rAcip\projects\pw94\pow94-21~nspect2.sgr/ajp
Exhibit
Employee(s) included in this Agreement by and between the City of TEMECULA and
EMPLOYMENT SYSTEMS, INC., (is/are) listed below:
Employee 1: Mike Nichols
(under the supervising direction of Don Sl~ai~nolo)
Total ESI payroll to Employee 1: $ 24.00 per hour
Overtime will be paid at a rate of time and one-half the pay rate ( $36.00 per ho-r ) for any hours
worked in excess of eight (8) hours per day or forty (40) hours per week.
Hourly Billing Rate to TEMECULA for Employee 1: $ 29.70 per hour *
The billing rate for Employee I is based on all hours paid to this employee. Overtime will be
billed at a rate of time and one-half the billing rate ( $ 44.55 per hoHr ) for any hours worked in
excess of eight (8) hours per day or forty (40) hours per week.
The benefits provided to this employee are:
Insurance: Medical/Dental/AD&D/Life/Long Term Disability
Number of Vacation days: ~
Number of Sick days: ~
Number of Holidays: 17 days
New Year's Day, Martin Luther King's Birthday, Columbus Day, President's Day, Memorial Day, Fourth of July,
Labor Day, Veteran's Day, Thanksgiving Day, Day after Thanksgiving, Christmas Eve, Christmas Day.
It is understood that (this/these) employee(s) will be driving a dty vehicle for any field
assignments. If the employee(s) use(s) a personal car on such assignments, billing to the City
of TEMECULA will be at the rate of $ .36/mile.
6
ITEM 20
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL Ry
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE DIREC O
CITY MANAGE
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
February 13, 1996
Sewer Facilities Agreement with Eastern Municipal Water District for
Relocation of Sanitary Sewer for Winchester Road at Interstate Route
15, Bridge Widening and Northbound Ramp Improvements, Project No.
PW94-21
PREPARED BY: ~ Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council:
Approve the Interagency Agreement and Bill of Sale, and authorize the Mayor to
execute both documents.
Authorize payment to the Eastern Municipal Water District for engineering, inspection
and testing fees in the amount of $3,940.00.
BACKGROUND:
During the design phase of the project, the City received a sewer facilities agreement for the
sewer line relocation for Winchester Road at Interstate Route 15, Bridge Widening and
Northbound Ramp Improvements, Project No. PW94-21 from Eastern Municipal Water District
(EMWD).
This sewer facilities agreement sets forth the terms and conditions associated with the
relocation of the sewer which is included in the project· Approximately 170 linear feet of the
existing 15" V.C.P. sewer main and 850 linear feet of existing 8" V.C.P. which are located
within existing easements, will be abandoned· The contractor will construct approximately
850 linear feet of new line in the new location which is about 100 feet east of the new loop
on-ramp in an easement on a portion of the Mervyn's and Palm Plaza parking area·
The agreement includes the description of the work to be performed, the City's responsibilities
and EMWD's responsibilities during construction. The City's contractor will construct the new
line within the easement acquired by the City. The City will also convey the new sewer line
facilities to the District through a Bill of Sale (see Exhibit "C"). The District will inspect the
new facility, accept ownership of the line, and provide future maintenance.
The agreement has been reviewed and approved as to form by the City Attorney.
· -1- r:~gdrpt~96\O213\pw94-21.agr/ajp
FISCAL IMPACT:
The Redevelopment Agency (RDA) has allocated funds for this project.
through RDA Account No. 280-199-602-5804 for the required $3,940.
ATTACHMENTS:
Sewer Facilities Agreement and Bill of Sale
Funds are available
-2- r.~d~i~t\96\0213~94-21 .qdmjp
INTERAGENCY AGREEMENT BETWEEN
EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT AND THE CITY OF TEMECULA
RELATIVE TO RELOCATION OF SEWER MAIN AT 1-15 & WINCHESTER ROAD
This Agreement is made and entered into this day of
, 19 , by and between EASTERN MUNICIPAL
WATER DISTRICT, a public agency organized and existing pursuant to
Division 20 of the California Water Code (hereinafter "District")
and the CITY OF TEMECULA, an incorporated municipality (hereinafter
"City").
WHEREAS, City, in anticipation of expected urbanization of the
area, is planning to expand the highway interchange located at
Winchester Road and 1-15; and
WHEREAS, in order to proceed with the highway interchange
expansion project, City must remove and/or abandon two
existing District sewer mains and relocate the sewer service
to a new locale, all as shown on Exhibit A attached hereto and
incorporated herein; and
WHEREAS, the purpose of this Agreement and its attached
exhibits is to set forth the terms and conditions associated
with the required abandonment and/or relocation of District's
facilities (hereinafter referred to as "Subject Project").
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above recited premises,
together with the mutual covenants herein contained and attached
hereto, it is mutually agreed as follows:
AGREEMENT
1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Remove or abandon in place approximately 850 LF of
existing 15" VCP sewer mainpipeline as shown on attached
Exhibit A.
Remove or abandon in place approximately 170 LF of 8" VCP
sewer main pipeline as shown on attached Exhibit A.
Install approximately 820 LF of 15" VCP sewer main
pipeline to~replace abandoned 15" sewer pipeline.
D. Install six (6) 48" diameter standard manholes.
2. FINANCIAL PARTICIPATION
City shall finance the entire cost of the Subject Project
including all applicable permits and environmental assessment
Page 1
costs, as such project is generally shown on said Exhibit A,
the preliminary estimate of cost of which is $116,610.00, as
developed and shown on the cost estimate attached hereto and
by this reference made a part hereof as Exhibit B.
3. CITY'S OBLIGATIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES
PLANNING, DESIGNING ANDPREPARATION OF CONSTRUCTION PLANS
FOR THE SUBJECT PROJECT
City shall, at its expense, with its staff and/or, by
employing a properly qualified professional engineering
firm, plan, design and prepare detailed construction
plans and specifications for the Subject Project covered
by this Agreement.
B. FURNISHING AND CONSTRUCTION OF THE SUBJECT PROJECT
Following receipt of District approval of the design and
detailed construction plans and specifications for the
Subject Project, City shall:
1)
2)
Unless otherwise approved by District in writing,
request and receive at least four (4) bids from
qualified and properly licensed contractors for the
Subject Project.
With the written concurrence of District, employ
the qualified and properly licensed contractor with
the lowest bid to construct the Subject ProjeCt in
accord with District approved plans and
specifications.
City shall directly pay all costs associated with such
furnishing and construction of the Subject Project. All
facilities furnished, constructed and installed by City's
contractor shall be installed in strict compliance with
plans and specifications. Any and all deviations from
such approved plans and/or specifications must be
approved by District in writing prior to being made.
C. INSPECTION OF CONSTRUCTION
City hereby appoints District to inspect the furnishing
and installation of all of the Subject Project and the
performance of the involved work associated therewith to
be performed by City's contractor for compliance with the
approved detailed construction plans and specifications.
It is specifically understood that District's inspection
personnel shall have 'the authority to enforce such
District approved detailed construction plans and
specifications for the involved facilities, which
Page 2
authority shall include the authority to require that any
and all unacceptable materials, workmanship and/or
installation be replaced, repaired or corrected by City's
contractor without cost to District. District's
inspection does not include inspection for compliance
with safety requirements by City's contractor.
In addition, City shall require its contractor to repair
all facilities damaged by any party prior to District's
final acceptance and to provide for a one-year materials
and workmanship guarantee from the date of acceptance,
providing that the contractor will repair, at its
expense, all failures of facilities which it furnished,
installed and/or constructed due to faulty materials or
installation, including settlement of backfill. Said
guarantee shall be secured by a Time Certificate of
Deposit in the amount of $2,000.00 guaranteeing payment
to District for its incurred costs of making any
necessary repairs associated with Subject Project in the
event City's contractor fails to cause satisfactory
repair of the facilities within a specified period of
time following District's notification. Notwithstanding
the above, District shall have the unqualified right to
immediately make any emergency repairs necessary to
eliminate any threat to the public's health, safety or
welfare and to ensure continuity of service at City's
nonreimbursable expense.
FIELD ENGINEERING SURVEYS AND COMPACTION AND MATERIALS
STRENGTH TESTS ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION
City, at its expense, shall provide all field engineering
surveys and compaction and strength of concrete and other
materials testing and reports required by City's
engineer, appropriate public agency officials .and/or
District inspection personnel. City shall promptly
furnish results of all testing to District for its
review.
PRECONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE
A preconstruction conference shall be arranged for and
scheduled by City. District personnel shall be invited
to attend and participate in said preconstruction
conference.~
At the preconstruction conference, City shall designate,
in writing, those who have authority to represent City
and shall immediately advise District of any changes in
such authorized representation.
EASEMENTS AND/OR FEE TITLE OWNERSHIP ACOUISITION
Page 3
For those portions of the Subject Project which are to be
constructed by City's contractor within and across
private property upon which District does not already
possess appropriate easements or other rights of way,
City shall be responsible for, at its expense, acquiring
duly executed easements and/or fee title ownership deeds
to assure District's unequivocal right to own, operate,
maintain, replace, repair and provide service from and
through all involved portions of the subject facilities.
G. CONVEYANCE OF OWNERSHIP
Upon completion of the Subject Project and written
acceptance thereof by District, City shall execute a Bill
of Sale, which is attached to this Agreement as
Exhibit C, conveying title to District, which conveyance
of title shall include a warranty by City that such title
is free and clear of any and all encumbrances.
H. PAYMENT OF DISTRICT ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION EXPENSES
City shall make payments to District to cover District's
engineering, inspection and testing expenses resulting
from District's fulfillment of its responsibilities under
this Agreement.
I. HOLD HARMLESS
City hereby agrees to indemnify and hold District
harmless from any and all claims for damage to property
or injuries to persons arising by reason. of or in any
manner connected with the operations covered by this
Agreement that are to be performed by other than
personnel and equipment supplied directly by District.
Such indemnification shall include attorneys' fees and
court costs.
DISTRICT'S OBLIGATIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES
A. PLAN REVIEW AND APPROVAL AND CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION
District shall review the design and detailed
construction plans and specifications prepared by City's
engineer; inspect and test the facilities installed
and/or abandoned by City's contractor; participate in
preconstruction conference(s) and activity coordination
activities; cooperate with City relative to easements,
permits and/or fee title acquisitions; and all other
obligations and responsibilities under this Agreement, on
an actual cost basis.
Page 4
_. B. MAINTENANCE AND SERVICE
OWNERSHIP AND OPERATING.
RESPONSIBILITIES
Upon completion of the involved facilities and acceptance
of ownership thereof, District shall operate, maintain
and provide service from and through the facilities.
City shall have no further responsibility or liability
for such facilities.
C. SEPARATE COST ACCOUNTING RECORDS
District shall establish and maintain individual separate
cost accounting records under which all its actual
incurred expenses for the Subject Project will be clearly
identified and set forth. Such records shall be made
available to City upon request.
D. HOLD HARMLESS
District hereby agrees to indemnify and hold City
harmless from any and all claims for damage to property
or injuries to persons arising by reason of or in any
manner connected with the operations covered by this
Agreement that are to be performed by District personnel
or equipment. Such indemnification shall include
attorneys' fees and court costs.
PREPARATION OF THIS AGREEMENT
This Agreement shall not be construed against the Party
preparing it, but shall be construed as if all Parties
prepared it.
PURPOSE OF CAPTIONS
Captions of Paragraphs are for convenience purposes only and
are not part of this Agreement.
BINDING PROVISION
This Agreement is binding of the heirs, representatives,
successors and assigns of the Parties hereto.
SEVERABILITY
&
If any portion of this Agreement is declared by a court of law
to be invalid or unenforceable, such portion shall be deemed
severed from this Agreement and the remaining parts shall
remain in full effect as though such invalid or unenforceable
provision had not been a part of this Agreement·
Page 5
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this Agreement to be
executed as of the date first above written.
EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT
ATTEST:
Mary C. White, Secretary
By:
John B. Brudin, General Manager
Dated:
CITY OF TEMECULA
ATTEST:
lw 7/18/9~
By:
Dated:
, Mayor
Page 6
..... BILL OF SALE
For a valuable consideration. receipt of which is hereby acknowledged.
CITY OF TEMECULA (Seller), hereby bargains. conveys,
and grants unto the Eastern Municipal Water District (District), a public agency of
the State of California, the following described personal property. such conveyance
to become effective upon completion of the construction/installation by Seller's
Contractor(s) and acceptance bythe District of such personal property, which is more
specifically described as:
The Subject Sewer Facilities which are to be furnished and constructed by
Sponsor's Contractor(s) as described and provided for in that certain
Agreement, by and between Sponsor (Seller in this Bill of Sate) and
District. dated , to which this Bill of Sale
is attached as Exhibit c.
Seller hereby warrants that the above-described personal property is free and clear
of any and all encumbrances. In this regard Seller hereby agrees to protect and
defend (District's) right to own, operate, maintain and provide services through all
the personal property hereby transferred to District's ownership wherein the defense
of the District's right to own, operate, maintain and provide services as provided
hereinabove results from any person or entity's alleged rights to any of the personal
property described hereinabove or for any monetary damages resulting from the
nonpayment by Seller of any erson or entity having the right to file a li against
said personal property. Seller further agrees to indemnify the District en
for any and
all losses which may be occasioned or suffered by the District as a result of any
claims by others as to clear title of the personal property covered hereby.
Subscribed and sworn to before me
this day of
19
Notary Public in and for the State
of California
Expi rati on Date
(Signature)
(lype name and litle)
'(Signature)
(lype Name and litle)
(Mailing'Address)
(Date)
EXHIBIT C
X
Z
Z
EN-56b
COST ESTIMATE OF SEWER FACILITIES
Developer City of Temecula Tract
W.O./C.O.# 94-285 I.D./S.A.# U-8/34 Date 5/5/95
Est'r. Initials CFW Sup'r Intials VJB Typist Initials
Implementing Facilities: Yes
List
No X
Sewer Easement: Yes X
In Project X Offsite
work Authorization: Yes No
Sewer Backflow Valves:
Required Lots:
Treatment Plant Notification:
Needed Not Needed
A. Sewer Line Installation: 820 L.F. - 15" VCP Sewer Main
None
B. Installation of Manholes and Cleanouts: 6 ea. - 48" dia.
std. manhole
$ 61,500.00
C. Miscellaneous Installation: 850 L.F. - Remove or abandon __
exist. 15" sewer; 170 L.F. - remove or abandon exist. 8" swr.
$ 12,000.00
D. T.V. 820
$ 20.400.00
Feet of Sewer Line .......... , ............. $ 410.00
SUBTOTAL $ 94.310.00
Contingencies, add to subtotal immediately preceding (10%)~$ 9.430.00
SUBTOTAL,' ........... - ........................... ,,,, ....... $103.740.00
Engineering (by Developer's Engineer)
add to subtotal immediately preceding ( 9.0%},,,,, ........ ,.$ 9.340.00
EMWD Engineering, Plan Review, and Construction
Inspection, add to subtotal immediately preceding ( 3.4%} ..,$ 3.530.00
TOTAL ESTIMATED COST - SEWER $116,610.00
AMOUNTS ARE TO BE ROUNDED OFF TO THE NEAREST $10.00
*Estimated costs to be incurred by EMWD
Typed original to New Business
CC: Engineering File, R/W File
EXHIBIT B
ITEM 21
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
.C J.oseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
February 13, 1996
Sewer Facilities and Service Agreement with Eastern Municipal Water
District for Construction of a Sanitary Sewer in Pauba Road for the
Parkview Site Improvement Project -
Phase I, Fire Station No. 84, Project No. PW95-09.
PREPARED BY: ~ Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects
Steve Charette, Assistant Engineer - Capital Projects
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council:
Approve the attached Interagency Agreement and Bill of Sale, and authorize the Mayor
to execute both documents;
Authorize payment to the Eastern Municipal Water District for engineering, inspection
and testing fees in the amount of $7,655.00.
BACKGROUND:
During the design phase of the project the City received a sewer facilities agreement for the
sewer line construction for Fire Station No. 84 Improvements, Project No. PW95-09 from
Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD).
This sewer facilities agreement sets forth the terms and conditions associated with the
construction of sewer facilities for the project. The City's contractor will construct a sewer
main and service lateral in Pauba Road for a distance of approximately 2,200 feet from an
existing sewer main located near the Community Lutheran Church Site to the new Fire Station.
The agreement includes the description of the work to be performed, the City's responsibilities
and EMWD's responsibilities during construction. The City will also convey the new sewer
line facilities to the District through a Bill of Sale (see Exhibit "F"). The District will inspect
the new facility, accept ownership of the line, and provide future maintenance.
The agreement has been reviewed and approved as to form by the City Attorney.
-1- r.~aBctrpt\96\O213~pw95-O9.nfrlmnc
FISCAL IMPACT:
The Fire Station facility and site improvements are funded by Fire Mitigation funds budgeted
in the City's Capital Improvements Program for FY 1994-1995, Account No. 210-190-626-
5804, and the improvements to Pauba Road are funded with Development Impact Fees,
Account No. 210-165-660-5804.
ATTACHMENTS:
Sewer Facilities Agreement and Bill of Sale
-2- r: ~agdrpt\96\O213 \pw95-Og.agr/smc
STANDARD SEWER FACILITIES AND/OR SERVICE AGREEME!fF
This Agreement is made and entered into this day of ,. 199_, by and
between Eastern Municipal Water District of San Jacinto California.
hereinafter referred to as District, and CII~/OF TEMECULA
of TEMECULA , hereinafter referred to as Sponsor.
WHEREAS, Sponsor is planning to develop [ ]'Tract FIRE STATION AT PAUBA ROAD
or [ ] the development, within District's Improvement
District No. 34 and Sewer Service Area No. U-8, which is generally shown and
depicted as the Subject Development on the map attached hereto and by this
reference made a part hereof as Exhibit A: and
WHEREAS, Sponsor is desirous of making financial and other arrangements with
District for [X] the sewer system facilities to serve the Subject Development
and/or for [X] sewer service therefor: and
WHEREAS, the sewer system facilities which are generally shown and depicted as the
Subject Sewer Facilities on the map attached hereto and by this reference made a
part hereof as Exhibit B are necessaryto so provide sewer service for said Subject
Development: and
WHEREAS, the purpose of this Agreement and the hereinbelow designated exhibits,
which are attached hereto and by this and other references herein made parts
hereof. is to set forth and cover the detailed financial and other arrangements,
by and between District and Sponsor, which shall be associated with the [X]
planning, designing, furnishing, construction and installation of the Subject Sewer
Facilities. the estimated cost of which is $ 96,840.00 as developed and shown in
the Preliminary Estimate of Cost which is attached hereto and by this reference
made a part hereof as Exhibit C and the ownership, operation and maintenance
thereof and/or [X] the provision of sewer service therethrough for the Subject
Development following their completion: and
WHEREAS,. upon Sponsor's fulfillment of all its obligations and responsibilities
provided for in this Agreement and District's applicable Amended Rules and
Regulations Governing the Provision of Sewer System Facilities and Service, which
are hereinafter sometimes referred to as District's Rules and Regulations, and the
completion of the Subject Se~er Facilities District shall accept, own, operate and
maintain said Subject Sewer Facilitie~ and make sewer service available
therethrough for Sponsor's Subject Development (and other lands, developments and
inhabitants which are accessible thereto)in accord with and pursuant to said
District's Rules and Regulations.
NOW, THEREFORE. in consideration of the above recited premises, together with the mutual
covenants hereincontained and attached hereto, it is agreed that:
Appl i cable Standard Sewer Faci 1 i ties Aqreement Related Provi si ons, Terms and Condi ti ons
Each and all of the provisions. terms and conditions set forth in the Applic'
Standard Sewer Facilities Agreement Related Provisions. Terms and Conditions, which
attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof as Exhibit D. that have bee~
designated (by an "x" mark in the Applicable [ ] for that purpose) as being applicable
in Paragraphs 2. and 3. hereinbelow shall be applicable for purposes of this Agreement
and shall be appropriately applied. fulfilled and complied with by District and Sponsor.
Sponsor's Obliqations and Responsibilities
Sponsor agrees to fulfill and/or perform each and all of the following listed
obligations and responsibilities which are herein designated as being Applicable for
Purposes of this Agreement (by an "x" mark in the [ ] for that purpose) in accord and
compliance with the provisions. terms and conditions set forth in the respective
referred to subparagraph(s) of attached Exhibit D and/or paragraph(s) of this Agreement:
Sponsor's Obligations/
Responsibilities Relative to:
Financial Participation in the Final
Total Cost(c)
Pursuant to:
Paragraph(s) Exhibit/
/Subpara- This Agree-
qraph(s) of: merit(a)
A.1)/4.A.&4.B. D/Hereof
Not
Appli- Appli-
cable cable
(b) (b)
[x] [ ]
Planning. Designing & Preparation
of P1 ans/Speci fi cati ons (c)
Furnishing & ConsTruction(c)
A.2) D
A.3) D
[x] [ ]
[x] [ ~-
D. Inspection of Construction(c)
A.4) D
Ix] [ _
Field Engineering Surveys & Compaction/
Material s Strength Tests
A.5) D
[x] [ ]'
Preconstruction Conferepce/Activity/
Coordination/Designation Authorized
Representative
A.6) D
[x] [ ]
G. City/County Road Permits
A.7) D
[x] [ ]
Easements:
Involving Lands of Others
Involving Lands of Sponsor
A.8) D
A.9) D
[x] [ ]
[x] [ ]
Deeds:
Involving Lands Qf Others
Involving Lands of Sponsor
A.iO) D
A.11) D
[ ] Ix]
[ ] Ix]
J. Separate Cost Accounting Records
A.12) D
[x] [ ]
K. Furnish Separate Cost Accounting Records
A.13) D
[x] [ ]
Conveyance of Ownership(c)
A.14)
[x] [ ]
Payment to District to Cover District's:
Engineer/Inspection Expenses
Materials/Construction Expenses
A.15)a)/6.A. D/Hereof [X] [ ]
A.15)b)/6.B. D/Hereof [X] [ ]
N. Irrevocable Instrument of Credit
A.16)5.G D/Hereof [ ] [X]
O. Environmental= Information/Assistance
A.17) D :[X] [ ]
Sponsor Holding District Harmless
Payment of Appl i cable Di strict
Charges
Bi 11 i ng to Di strict for Di strict' s
Fixed Final Financial Participation
A.18) D [X] [ ]
A.19)/6.C.,6.D.,
6.E. & 6.F. D/Hereof [X] [ ]
A.20) D [ ] [X]
Annexation of Land to Improvement
Di strict
A.21/13. D/Hereof [ ] [X]
T. Formati on of New Improvement Di strict
A.21/13. D/Hereof [ ] [X]
U. Assessment Districts
A.22) D [ ] [X]
V. Street Addresses
A.23) D [X] [ ]
Special Terms, Conditions and/or
Requirements
A.24) [X] [ ]
X. Backfl ow Device
.[ ] [x]
Y. Treatment P1 ant Locati on Noti fi cati on
[ ] [x]
(a) Hereof.
(b) For the Purposes of this Agreement.
(c) Of or to the Subject Sewer Facilities.
District's Obliqations and Responsibilities
District agrees to fulfill and/or perform each and all of the following listed
obligations and responsibilities which are herein designated as being Applicable for the
Purposes of this Agreement (by an "x" mark in the [ ] for that purpose) in accord and
compliance with the provisions. terms and conditions set forth in the respective
referred to subparagraph(s) of attached Exhibit D and/or paragraph(s) of thisAgreement:
District's Obligations/
Responsibilities Relative to:
Fixed Financial Participation in the
Final Total Cost(c)
Pursuant to:
Paragraph(s) Exhibit/
/Subpara- This Agree-
qraph(s) of: ment(a)
B.1)/4.C. D/Hereof
Not
Appl i - Appl i -
cable cable
(b) (b)
[ ] Ix]
B. Plan Review/Approval & Construction
Inspection
B.2)
D
[x]. [ ~
Furnishing and Construction of
Portions(c)
Acceptance, Ownership, O&M, & Service
Responsibilities
B.3)
B.4)/12.
D
[ ] [x]
D/Hereof [X] [ ]
Determination of Final Total Costs
Determination of Sponsor's Final
Financial Participation
B.5)/8.
B.6)/8.
D/Hereof [X] [ ]
D/Hereof [X] [ ]
G. District Holding Sponsor Harmless
B.7)
Ix] [ ]
(a) Hereof.
(b) For the Purposes of this Agreement.
(c) Of the Subject Sewer Facilities.
Sponsor's and District's Financial Participations in the Cost of the Sub.iect Sewer
Faci 1 i ties
A. Sponsor's Final Financial Participation(a)
Sponsor shall finance the Final Total Cost (actual cost) of the Subject Sewer
Facilities less the amount, if any, of District's Fixed Financial Participation
provided for in Subparagraph 4.C. hereinbelow. The resulting cost to Sponsor, ~-
determined by District, is hereinafter referred to as Sponsor's Final Finant
Participation.
(a) In addition to making payment(s) of applicable District Charges pursuant to
the provisions of Paragraph 6. hereinbelow.
Sponsor's Estimated Financial Participation(a) - Basis for Estab!ishinq the fixed
Amounts of Credits to Which Sponsor Will be Entitled
Based on the $ 96,840.00 estimated cost of the Subject Sewer Facilities developed
in Exhibit C, District's Fixed Financial Participation, in the amount of $ -O-
as provided for in Subparagraph 4.C. hereinbelow, Sponsor's Estimated Financial
Participation (the estimated cost of the Subject Sewer Facilities minus District's
Fixed Financial Participation, if any) is $96,840.00
Notwithstanding any other provisions set forth in this Agreement, it is hereby
specifically agreed that the amounts of Nonreimbursable and Potentially
Reimbursable Credits to which Sponsor shall be entitled pursuant to the provision
of Paragraph 9. hereinbelow in consideration of Sponsor's Final Financial
Participation shall be determined by District based on the amount of Sponsor's
Estimated Financial Participation, Exhibit C and dimensions/lengths shown on
maps/plans of the Subject Development approved by District.
(a)
In addition to making payment(s) of applicable District Charges pursuant
provisions of Paragraph 6. hereinbelow.
C o
District's Fixed Financial Participation
District's Fixed Final Financial Participation in the Final Total Cost of the
Subject Sewer Facilities shall amount to the sum of $ -0- as developed in the
Computation of District Financial Participation attached hereto and by this
reference made a part hereof as Exhibit E. Such District Financial Participation,
if any, shall be paid to Sponsor as provided for in Paragraph 7. hereinbelow.
Documents to be Furnished to District by Sponsor
Sponsor shall furnish each and all of the following listed documents, which are herein
designated as being Applicable for the Purposes of this Agreement (by an "x" mark in the
[ ] for that purpose) and which have been duly executed by Sponsor or the involved other
party, to District in accord with the indicated time schedule for each respective
document:
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
K o
Document(s)
City/County Road Permits
Easements
Deeds
Separate Cost Accounting Records
Bill of Sale
Time Certificate of Deposit
in the Amount of $ 2.000.00
Irrevocable Instrument of
Credit in the Amount of
$ -O-
Petition for Annexation to or
Formation of Improvement District
Billing for District's Fixed
Financial Participation
List of Approved Stree~ Addresses
for Lots/Units of the Tract/
Development to be Served
Treatment Plant Location Notification
(a) Hereof.
(b)
Pursuant to: Not
Paragraph(s) Exhibit/To be Appli-Appli-
/Subpara- This Agree- Fur- cable cable
qraph(s) of: ment(a) nished (b) (b)
A.7) D (c) IX] [ ]
A.8)&A.9) D (c) [X] [ ]
A.10)&A.11) D/G&H (c) [ ] [X]
A.12)&A.13) D (d) [X] [ ]
A.14) D/F (e) [X] [ ]
A.4) D (e) I'.]
A.16) D (e) [ ] [X]
A.21)/13. D/Hereof (e) [ ] [X]
A.20/2.R. D/Hereof (f) [ ] [X]
A.23) D (e)
For the Purposes of this Agreement.
[X] [ ]
[ ] [X]
(c) Not less than 15 calendar days before construction of the involved facili*-~,
is to begin.
(d) Within 90 calendar days after District's acceptance of the Subject Sew~.
Faci 1 i ties.
(e) Concurrently with Sponsors execution and delivery of this Agreement to
Di strict.
(f) Within 30 calendar days after District's acceptance of the Subject Sewer
Facilities·
Cash Payments to be Made by SDonsor to District
Sponsor shall make each and all of the rollowing listed cash payments, which are herein
designated as being Applicable for the Purposes of this Agreement (by an "x" mark in the
[ ] for that purpose), to District concurrently with Sponsor's execution and delivery
of this Agreement to District: Not
Pur- Appli- bppli-
suant cable cable
Payment of/for: to: Amount (a) (a)
Estimated Engineering & Inspection
Expenses
(b) $ 5,310.00 (c) D(] [ ]
Estimated Materials Furnishing &
Construction Expenses
(d) 0.00 (c) [ ] [X]
Nonreimbursable Basic Sewer Frontage
Charges
(e) 0.00 (f) [ ]
Nonreimbursable Special Sewer Frontage
Charges (g)
0.00 (h) [ ] IX]
Sewer System & Disposal Facilities
Financial Participation Charges
(i) 1.955.00 (j) [x] [ ]
Sewer Treatment P1 ant Capacity
Financial Participation Charges
(k) 1,890.00 (j) [X] [ ]
Water for Facilities/Plumbing Testing
Purposes
(1) 0.00 (m) [ ] [X]
TOTAL
$ 9,155.00
Less Initial Partial Payment of
Engineering Expenses Paid on 8/8/95 $
Less Previous Fees Paid on $
1.500.00
0.00
Combined Total to be Remitted with
Signed Copies of this Agreement
7,655.00
(a) For the Purposes of this Agreement.
(b) Subparagraph A.15)a) of Exhibit D.
(c) Subject to future adjustment pursuant to Subparagraph A.15) of Exhibit D.
(d) Subparagraph A.15)b) of Exhibit D.
(e) Section ll.01 of District's applicable Rules and Regulations, Resolution
No. 1643(n).
(f) Fixed amount, notsubject to adjustment.
(g) Section ll.04 of District's applicable Rules and Regulations, Resolution
No. 1643(n).
(h) Fixed amount, not subject to adjustment.
(i) District's Amended Sewer. System and Disposal Facilities Financial
Participation Charge Policy (Resolutions Nos. 1641 and 1642, both as
amended).
(j) Comprised of payments by Sponsor; Credit to Sponsor in consideration of
Sponsor's Final Financial Participation pursuant to Subparagraph 9.B.3)
hereinbelow; Credit assigned from another document; and applicable assessment
district Community Facilities District related Credit (as appropriate),
subject to future adjustment responsive to the provisions of Subparagraph
16.B. hereinbelow and/or future changes in the Subject Development and
attendant increases in sewer service requirements.
(k) District's Amended Sewer Treatment Plant Capacity Financial Participation
Charge Policy (Resolutions Nos. 1599 and 1600, both as amended).
(1) Section 9.04(m) of District's applicable Rules and Regulations.
(m) Subject to future adjustment based on water use as measured or otherwise
reasonably determi ned by Di stri ct's Staff.
(n) As amended.
Payment to be Made bv District to Sponsor
District shall make payment of its Fixed Final Financial Participation in the Final
Total Cost of the Subject Sewer Facilities, if any, provided for in Subparagraph 4.C.
hereinabove and attached Exhibit E, responsive to its receipt of an appropriate, as
determined by District, billing therefor rendered by Sponsor pursuant to the provisions
of Subparagraph A.20) of attached Exhibit D, within fifteen (15) days after receipt of
such billing.
Determination of the Total Final Cost of the Subject Sewer Facilities and Sponsors
Financial Participation by District
Following completion of the Subject Sewer Facilities and receipt of Sponsor's Separate
Cost Accounting Records pursuant to Subparagraph A.13) of Exhibit D, District shall
determine the Total Final Cost of the Subject Sewer Facilities and the amount of
Sponsor's Final Financial Participation therein, pursuant to the provisions of
Subparagraphs B.5) and B.6) of Exhibit D. and Subparagraphs 3.E. an 3.F. hereinabove.
Credits to Sponsor Toward Payment of Applicable District Charqes
Based on the provision of Subparagraph 4.B. hereinabove and Sponsor's payment of
District Charges pursuant to the provisions of Paragraph 6. hereinabove. District will
(in its records) credit Sponsor with payment of applicable District Charges in the below
indicated respective amounts, which credits and all terms. conditions and rights
associated therewith shall be individually covered and provided for in the respective
listed separate related documents:
District Charqe/Surcharqe/Pursuant to:
Amount
of Credit
Related Separate Docu~
A. Credits for Nonreimbursable District Charqes Paid by Sponsor
l) Basic Sewer Frontage Charges/
Subparagraph 6.C.(a)
$ 0.00
Frontage Charge/Surcharge
Receipt No.
2) Special Sewer Frontage Charges/
Subparagraph 6.D.(a)
0.00
Frontage Charge/Surcharge
Receipt No.
3)
Sewer System and Disposal
Facilities Financial Partici-
pation Charges/Subparagraph
6.E.(a)
1,955.00
(b)
Sewer System and Disposal
Facilities Financial
Participation Charge
Receipt No.
4)
Sewer Treatment Plant Capacity
Financial Participation
Charges/Subparagraph 6.F.(a)
1,890.00
Sewer Treatment Plant
Capacity Financial
Participation Charge
Receipt No.
Credits for Nonreimbursable District Charqes Credited in Consideration of Sponsor's
Final Financial Participation
1)
2)
3)
Basic Sewer Frontage Charges/
Sec. 11.01, Res. No. 1643(c)
Special Sewer Frontage Charge/
Sec. 11.04, Res. No. 1643(c)
Sewer System and Disposal
Facilities Financial Part.
Chgs. Subparagraph 6.E.(a)(d)
0.00
0.00
Frontage Charge/Surcharge
Receipt No.
Frontage Charge/Surchat
Receipt No.
0.00
Sewer System and Disposal
Facilities Fin. Part. Chg
Receipt No.
Credits for Potentially Reimbursable District Charc~es Credited in Consideration of
Sponsor's Final Financial Participation
1)
Additional Basic Sewer Frontage
Charges/Sec. 11.02, Res. No.
1643(c)
0.00
Frontage Charge/Surcharge
Receipt No.
2)
3)
Additional Capacity Charges/
Sec. 11.03o Res. No. 1643(c)
Additional Special Sewer
Frontage Charges/Sec. 11.05,
Res. No. 1643(c)
0.00
0.00
Potentially Reimbursable
Additional Capacity Chg.
Agreement No.
Frontage Charge/Surcharge
Receipt No.
(a) Of this Agreement.
(b) Covers both cash payment and credit in consideration of Sponsors Final
Financial Participation (as applicable).
(c) As amended.
(d) As computed and provided for in Exhibit I (Special Terms. Conditions
and/or Requirements).
The applicable Related Separate Documents Identified under this Paragraph 9.. which are
hereinafter referred to as the Subject Documents and which shall be prepared by District
and appropriately executed under the same date as this Agreement, shall be held by
District until the Subject Sewe~ Facilities have been accepted by District pursuant to
the provisions of Paragraph 12. hereinbelow and Sponsor has furnished its Separate Cost
Accounting Records to District pursuant to the provisions of Subparagraph A.13) of
Exhibit D. Following such acceptance and receipt of Sponsor's Separate Cost Accounting
Records. a copy of each Subject Document will be promptly furnished to Sponsor by
District. Sponsor shall not be entitled to any reimbursements pursuant to the Subject
Documents while they are being so held by District.
10. District's Riqht to Complete the Sub.iect Sewer Facilities
Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, it is hereby specifically agreed
that:
If Sponsor has not taken all actions necessaryto cause construction of the Subject
Sewer Facilities to be furnished, installed and constructed by Sponsor's
Contractor(s) to have been begun by Sponsor's Contractor(s) within sixty (60)
calendar days after the date of this Agreement; or
In the event at.any time after construction of the Subject Sewer Facilities has
been begun by Sponsor's Contractor(s). Contractor(s) or Sponsor. for'any reason.
causes work toward completion of the Subject Sewer Facilities to be interrupted,
delayed and/or discontinued for a period of more than thirty (30) calendar days,
without written District approval; or
Construction of the Subject Sewer Facilities to be furnished, installed and
constructed by Sponsor's Contractor(s) has not been completed by the completion
date specified in Sponsor's contract(s) with Sponsor's Contractor(s), or such later
date as District has given Sponsor written approval for; and
D. If Sponsor, after having been given written notice by District:
1)
Specifying the involved problem (related to the provisions of Subparagraph
IO.A., iO.B. or IO.C. above);
2)
Allowing Sponsor ,a reasonable period of time within which to take remedial
actions which are satisfactory to District: and
3)
Stating District's intentions to exercise its rights under this Paragraph 10.
if such a satisfactory remedial action is not taken by Sponsor within the
allowed remedial time period.
has not taken remedial action which is satisfactory to the District within tb~_
remedial period set forth in said notice to Sponsor. District is hereby granted ~
unqualified right to take such steps as it reasonably determines to be necessa.
and appropriate to complete all or such portions of said Subject Sewer Facilitie~
as District determines necessary for its purposes. in which event:
Sponsor shall be exclusively responsible for any and all legal and/or financial
ramifications and/or settlements with Sponsor's Contractor(s):
District shall have the unqualified right to demand and. receive payment(s) under
the Irrevocable Instrument of Credit provided for in Subparagraphs 2.N. and 5.G.
hereinabove to, together with District's Financial Participation provided for in
Subparagraph 4.C. hereinabove, finance such completion of all or such portions of
the Subject Sewer Facilities as District determines necessary for its purposes: and
The amount(s) of Sponsor's potentially reimbursable amounts provided for in
Subparagraph 9.C. hereinabove. if any. shall, at District's discretion, be reduced
by the amount, if any, of District's total expenditures toward the cost of the
Subject Sewer Facilities which exceeds the total combined amount of its $ -O-
Fixed Final Financial Participation provided for in Subparagraph 4.C.
hereinabove and the Irrevocable Instrument of Credit payments it receives pursuant
to the provisions of Subparagraph iO.F. above.
11. Force Ma.ieure
If either the District or the Sponsor is delayed, hindered or prevented from performing
any term of this Agreement, or if any condition precedent or condition subsequenL.
hereunder either occurs or is precluded from occurring, by any reason beyond eith
party's control, including without limitation any strike, walkout, inability to procul.
material, failure of power, restrictive laws or regulations, riot, war, act of God or
the default of the other party, then such performance or condition will be. as
applicable. either excused or tolled during the period of delay and the applicable time
period or deadline will be extended by a period equal to the period of such delay, in
which event the provisions of this Agreement shall be formally amended and modified in
writing as necessary to address and cover all changes, including, but not-limited to.
costs and financial participations of the Parties, made necessary by the problem(s)
which caused the delays and the resolution(s) thereof prior to continuing with the
planning, furnishing andinstallation of the Subject Sewer Facilities.
12. Acceptance of Ownership of the Subject Sewer Facilities
As provided in Subparagraph B.4) of attached Exhibit D. the Subject Sewer Facilities
will be accepted by District for ownership, operation and maintenance and provision of
sewer service purposes only following their satisfactory completion and Sponsor's
fulfillment of all its obligations and responsibilities provided for in this Agreement
and its attached exhibits. all as determined by District.
District acceptance of the Subject Sewer Facilities is further conditioned and
contingent upon the completion of other sewer system facilities covered by any other
agreement, by and between District and Sponsor or other party(ies) which are necessary
to make sewer service available to the Subject Sewer Facilities, all as determined by
District.
10
14.
Applicable Special Sewer Service Limitations
No sewer service will be provided to the Sub.iect Development from or through the Subject
Sewer Facilities by District until they have been accepted by District., as provided for
in Paragraph 12. hereinabove: Sponsor has completed arrangements, including, but not
limited to, payment of all applicable District Charges, with District for such
service(s) in accord with District's applicable Rules and Regulations; and, if
applicable, leqal proceedinQs, resultinq in the annexation of the lands to be occupied
by the Sub.iect Development to the appropriate existinq District improvement district or
the formation of a new District improvement district which includes SDonsor-'s involved
lands as discussed in SubDaraqraph A.21) of attached.Exhibit D and SubparaqraDhs 2.S..
2.T. and 5.H. hereinabove. have been completed bv District with Sponsor's assistance and
cooperation, all as determined by District.
Following the satisfactory completion of construction and testing and before its
acceptance of the Subject Sewer Facilities, District will make sewer service available
for construction related purposes only from and through the Subject Sewer Facilities
under a separate Special Interim Construction Sewer Service Agreement, by and between
District and Sponsor, Sponsor's compliance with and fulfillment of the terms and
conditions of such a Special Interim Construction Sewer Service Agreement shall be a
prerequisite condition to District's acceptance of the Subject Sewer Facilities for
ownership, operation and maintenance and provision of sewer service purposes, in the
same manner as if such terms and conditions were set forth herein.
No Occupancy of the Sub.iect Development Before District Acceptance of Ownership of the
Sub.iect Sewer Facilities and Completion of Applicable Improvement District Annexation
or Formation Leqal Proceedinqs
Sponsor hereby specifically agrees not to permit any portion or unit of the Subject
Development to be occupied for any residential, commercial or industrial purpose, as
applicable, which requires sewer service until the Subject Sewer Facilities have been
accepted by District for ownership, operation and maintenance and provision of service
purposes, as provided for in Paragraph 12. hereinabove; Sponsor has completed
arrangements, including, but not limited to, payment ef all applicable District Charges,
with District for such service(s) in accord with District's applicable Rules and
R~gulations: and, if applicable, legal roceedings resulting in the annexation of the
lands to be occupied by the Subject DevelOpment to the appropriate District improvement
district or the formation of a new District improvement district, which includes said
involved lands, have been completed by District, as discussed in Paragraph 13
hereinabove.
15. Additional Arranqements Required for Phased Development
The provisions of this Agreement are based upon the development of the Subject Sewer
Facilities and the Subjec/c Development as a single phase project. Any and all
subsequent changes of plans which result in a multi-phased project for the provision of
the Subject Sewer Facilities and/or the provision of sewer service to the entire Subject
Development must be arranged for under an appropriate written and duly executed
amendment(s) or supplement(s) to this Agreement or a new separate agreement or
agreements as determined by District.
11
16o
Aqreement and District Charqes Applicability Limitations
A. Relative to This Entire Aqreement
This entire Agreement, including all its provisions, shall automatically be
cancelled and become null and void if it has not been executed on behalf of Sponsor
and District and Sponsor has not fulfilled all of its financial arrangement and
document furnishing obligations and responsibilities, which are hereinabove
required to be fulfilled concurrently with Sponsor's execution of this Agreement.
on or before JANUARY 30 .. , 199~: and
Relative to District Charqes
For the portion(s)/unit(s) of the Subject Sewer Facilities and/or the Subject
Development which have not been completed (as hereinbelow defined) by Sponsor on
or before MAY 30 , 1997 , as determined by District, the amounts of
all District Sewer Frontage, Addit'~onal Capacity, Sewer System and Disposal
Facilities Financial Participation and Sewer Treatment Capacity Financial
Participation Charges to be paid by Sponsor (pursuant to Subparagraphs 6.C., 6.D.,
6.E. and 6.F. hereinabove) or credited by District in consideration of Sponsor's
Final Financial Participation in the Final Total Cost of the Subject Sewer
Facilities (pursuant to Subparagraphs 9.B. and 9.C. hereinabove) shall be subject
to adjustment(s) which will reflect, include and cover the full per unit amounts
of such District Charges which are applicable at the time(s) the involved
portion(s) of the Subject Sewer Facilities and/or unit(s) of the Subject
Development have been completed (as defined hereinbelow), all as determined by
District. In this regard, it is specifically understood an~ agreed that Sponsor--
shall pay the full amount(s) of such adjusted District Charge(s), as a prerequisi
condition to District acceptance of the involved portion(s) of the Subject Sew~.
Facilities and/or the provision of water and sewer service to the involved unit(s)
of the Subject Development by District. For the purposes of this Subparagraph
16.B., the word completed shall:
Relative to the Subject Sewer Facilities, mean those Subject Sewer
Facilities which have been accepted and placed into service-by District:
and
Relative to the units of the Subject Development, mean those units which
have been certified for occupancy by the County of RiVerside or the
involved city (as appropriate),
all as determined by District.
17. Preparation of This Aqreement
This Agreement shall not b~ construed against the party preparing it, but shall be
construed as if both parties prepared it.
18. Purpose of Captions
Captions to Paragraphs are for convenience purposes only and are not part of this
Agreement.
12
19. Bi ndi nq Provi si on
This Agreement is binding on the heirs, representatives, successors and assigns of the
parties hereto.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed as of the date
first above written.
EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT (District)
AI'FEST:
By
Mary C. White, Board Secretary
John B. Brudin, General Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CONTENT:
REDWINE AND SHERRILL
(Sponsor)
(Signature)
(lype Name and litle)
(lype Mailing Address)
EB'56b
Developer City of Temecula
W.O./C.O. f96-2C6
Est'r. Initials CFW
COST ESTIMATB OF SEWER FACILITIES
Fire StatiOn
Tract Pauba Rd. ~
I.D./S.A.# U-8 Date 11/15/95
Super Intials VffB Typist Initials tlvt
Implementing Facilities: Yes X No ,' '
List PrQposed 8" sewer per new community Lutheran Church (Per SD-11702~to
SD-11704)
Sewer Easement: Yes In Project
Work AuthOrization= Yes__
No X Sewer Backflow Valves:
Offsite__ Required Lots:
No X '
Treatment Plant Notification:
Needed Not Needed
A. Sewer Line Installation: 2271 L.F. - 8' sewer main
· x
B. Installation of Manholes and Cleanouts: 6 ea - 48" die. std.
Manhole: 1 ea. - 48" die. Terminus mahole: 1 ea - on-site
f.ateral cleanout
C. Miscellaneous Installation:
$ 63,450.00
i
$ 10,600.00
Encasemerit
D. T.V.
2271 Feet of Sewer Line $ 1.140.00
SUBTOTAL $ 75,190.00
Contingencies, add to subtotal immediately preceding (10%)--$ 7.520.00
SUBTOTAL- $ 82,710.00
Engineering (by Developer*s Engineer)
add to subtotal immediately preceding ( 9.5 %1 $ 7.860.00
EMWD Plan Review** $ 1.~00.00
EMWD Inspection ~
add to subtotal immediately preceding- .S( 6.3t1 $ 4.170.00
As-builts 3 sheets X $200/sheet*** ........................ $ 600.00
**
2 sheet or less $1000
3-9 sheets
one system, water or sewer $1500
Two systems, water and sewer $2500@
10 sheets or more
One system, water or sewer $2000
Two systems, water and sewer $3000@
***($100/sheet if you have water and sewer in same sheet)
@(apply half the amount to each system cost estimate)
TOTAL ESTIMATED COST - SEWER
,Estimated costs to be incurred by EMWD
Typed original to New Business
S96.840.00
APPLICABLE STANDARD SEWER FACILi m its ~bn:=m=,~,
RELATED PROVISIONS. TERMS AND CONDITIONS
SPONSOR'S OBLIGATIONS/RESPONSIBILITIES
Sponsor shall fulfill. comply with and/or perform (as appropriate) each'el 1
of the following set forth obligations and responsibilities which have u~en
designated as 'Applicable for the Purposes of This Agreement" in Paragraph 2.
of the Agreement to which this Exhibit D is attached. which is hereinafter
sometimes referred to as this Agreement:
1) Financial Participation in Final Total Cost of the Sub.iect Sewer
Facilities.
Sponsor shall finance the Final Total Cost of the Subject Sewer
Facilities. in accord with the applicable provisions of Section 9.04 of
the District's Amended Rules and Regulations Governing the Provision of
Sewer System Facilities and Service. less the amount. if any. of
District's Fixed Final Financial Participation in such Final Total Cost
pursuant to the 'sions of Sub eragraph B.1) hereinbelow. Such
financing of the FPi~i~1 Total Cost. ~ss the amount Fi
of Di strict' s xed
Financial Participation. shall constitute Sponsor's Final Financial
Participation in the Final Total Cost of the Subject Sewer Facilities
covered by this Agreement.
2)
Pl anni no. Oesi eni no and PreDa rati on of Constructi on
SDeci fi cati ons for the Sub.iect Sewer Faci 1 iti es
Plans and
Sponsor shall employ, at its sole expense, a properly qualified
professional engineering firm or firms, hereinafter referred togas
sponsor's Engineer<s} to plan, design and prepare detailed construe q
lens and specifications for all of the Subject Sewer Facilities co~ j
~ythis Agreement, as they are generally shown on Exhibit B, in full and
complete accordance with District design criteria and standards. All such
pl anning and des i gn work and detai 1 ed . constructi on pl arts and
specifications performed and prepared by Sponsor's Engineer(s) shall be
subject to review and written a proval by District pri to the beginning
of any construction of the involved Subject Sewer aci°r
F liti.es. Such review
and approval of pl arts and speci fi cati ons for the Subject Sewer Faci 1 i ti es.
along with those for other projects, will be diligently processed by the
Di stri ct' s Staff i n the order they are received.
3) Furnishino and Construction/Installation of the Sub.iect Sewer Facilities
Following receipt of District approval of Sponsor's Engineer's(s') design
of and construction plans and specifications for the Subject Sewer
Facilities. Sponsor shall:
a) Unless otherwise specifically authorized and approved by District in
writing. request and receive at least four (4) competitive bids for
the furnishing and construction/installation each and all
segments/units of the Subject Sewer Facilities. in accord with said
District approved plans and specifications. from qualified and
properly licensed contractors approved by District. which approval
will not be unreasonably delayed or withheld: and
1 EXHIB, J
4)
6~11S)9 t)le wrllil~en concurrLglce OT UISl~rlCl~. ~fipiuy u~m: Huoj,, ,:u ~l,~
properly licensed contractor(s) with the lowest bid(s) under eacr,
respective involved specification. hereinafter referred to as
Sponsor's Contractor(s). to. in accord with such District approve~
p lans and speci fi cati ons. furnish and construct/i nsta 11 the Subj ec-.
Sewer Facilities. In keeping with District's policy anO
notwithstanding other provisions of this Agreement and these
Provisions. Terms and Conditions. in the event Sponsor. without
having received prior written approval and consent from District
employs other than the qualified and properly 1 i censed contractor(s i
with the lowest bid(s) to furnish and install the Subject S~ver
Facilities. the amount of Sponsor's credit for Potentially
Reimbursable Additional Basic and/or Special Sewer Frontage and/or
Capacity Charges. pursuant to the applicable provisions of Paragraph
9. of this Agreement (and separate documents referred to therein).
shall be subject to such adjustments by District as District deems
appropriate and necessary to result. insofar as is possible. in the
amount of such credit being equal to the amount which would have
resulted if Sponsor had employed the low bidding qualified and
properly licensed Contractor(s).
Sponsor shall directly pay all costs associated with such furnishing anO
construction/installation of the Subject Sewer Facilities by Sponsor's
Contractor(s).
All facilities so furnished. constructed and installed by S onsor's
Contractor(s) shall be installed in strict co liance with p~ans and
specifications therefore which have been approv1~D in writing by District
pursuant to the provisions of Subparagraph A.2) hereinabove and
Subparagraph B.2). hereinbelow. In this regard. any and all deviations
from such approved plans and/or specifications must be approved by
District. in writing. prior to being made Such District approval shall
be given as expeditiously as possible. '
Inspection of Construction bv SDonsor's Contractor(s)
Sponsor shall and does hereby appoint District to inspect the,furnishing
and construction/installation of all of the Subject Sewer Facilities and
the performance of the involved work associated therewith-to be performed
by Sponsor's Contractor(s) for compliance with the a proved detailed
construction plans and specifications as provided for in~ubparagraph A.2)
hereinabove and Subparagraph B.2} hereinbelow. It is specifically
understood that District's inspection personnel shall have the authority
to reasonably enforce such District approved detailed construction plans
and specifications for the involved facilities. which authority shall
include the authority to require that any and all unacceptable materials.
workmanship and/or installation be replaced. repaired or corrected by
Sponsor's Contractor(s) at said Sponsor's Contractor's(s') nonreimbursable
expense. ,
District's inspection provided for herein. does not include inspection for
compliance with safety requirements by Sponsor's Contractor(s).
In addition. Sponsor's Contractor(s) shall be required to repair any and
all installed facilities which have been damaged by any party. at no
expense to District. prior to District's final acceptance of the
2' EXHIBIT D
5)
faclill~les covereO hereby, wnlcn Tinal accept~arlce ~i)~,~ ~u~,~- .... ~,
i nspecti on, i nc 1 udi ng tel evi si on inspecti on, and testi ng of s ucr
faci l ities after completion of all improvements, including otheT
utilities curbs and paving. In this regard, Sponsor specifically agrees
to requir~ Sponsor's Contractor(s) responsible for the installation of
said Subject Sewer Facilities .to so make the corrections and/or rr-~rs
determined to be necessary by District inspection personnel and tD p de
for and require of each Sponsor's Contractor a one-year (following da~ of
final acceptance by District) materials and workmanship guarantee
providing that said Sponsor's 'Contractor will repair, at its expense, all
failures of facilities which it furnished, constructed and/or installeC
due to faulty materials or ~nstallation, including settlement of backfi 11
within said one-year period, Said guarantee shall be secured, insofar a_
District is concerned, by a Time Certificate of Deposit ~n favor o~
District in the amount set forth in Subparagraph 5, F. of this Agreement tc
be furnished by Sponsor to District concurrently with the execution of
this Agreement,
Said Time Certificate of Deposit shall remain in effect until canceled by
District. Said Time Certificate of Deposit shall be satisfactory to
District. as to form and content and involved financial firm. and shall
guarantee Sponsor's payment to District for its incurred costs of making
any necessary repairs associated with faci 1 iti es furni shed. constructed
and/or installed by Sponsor's Contractor(s) in the event Sponsor fails to
cause satisfactory repair. as determined by District. of facilities or
failures by Sponsor's Contractor(s) or others within 48 hours or such
other longer period of time as District may reasonably determine and
specify in its repair notification. based on the nature and extent of the
needed repair. following notification of the need therefor by District.
Notwithstanding the above provided for 48-hour or other speci fled repai r
period. District shall have the unqualified right to in~nediately make any
emergency repairs necessary to eliminate any threat to the pub~"~s
health. safety or welfare and to ensure continuity of service at Spon. s
nonreimbursabl e expense.
Field Enoineerino Surveys and Compaction and Materials Strenoth Tests
Associated With Construction by SDonsor's Contractor(s )
Sponsor's Engineer(s) shall provide all field engineering surveys
associated with the construction of each and all of the Subject Sewer
Facilities and/or related work to be furnished, constructed/installed
and/or performed by Sponsor's Contractor(s ), i ncl udi ng bui 1 di ng/
structure, facility, fitting and service horizontal and vertical location
staking, as determined necessary by Sponsor's Engineer(s), Sponsor's
Contractor(s), and/or District's inspection personnel, at Sponsor's direct
expense. Sponsor shall promptly furnish to District all field notes and
grade sheets, together with location, offset, and attendant data and
reports, resul ting from Sponsor' s Engineer' s(s' ) fi el d engi neeri ng surveys
and/or proppsed facility design changes, all of which have been prepared
in accordance with accepted professional engineering practices, and allow
District sufficient time to approve or make any required facility design
changes resulting therefrom prior to construction, which District
approvals and/or design changes will be processed as expeditiously as
possible.
3 EXHI,, O
6)
7)
8)
Sponsor snail be responsible for paying all sol ~ compac~on.
steel strength tests and report costs associated with the Subject Sewer
Facilities to be so furnished and constructed by Sponsor's Contractor(s)
required by Sponsor's Engineer(s), appropriate public agency officials
prompt y furnisn
and/or District inspection personnel, Sponsor shall 1
results of all such compaction and concrete and steel strength testing to
District for its review, evaluation and decision as to compliance with
applicable specifications, which review evaluation and decision District
shall make every reasonable effort to c___nn~lete within 72 hours after its
receipt of each involved test result,
Preconstructi on Conference(s ) and Activity Coordi nat~ on and Desi anati on of
Sponsor' s Authorized Representative
Sponsor shall be exclusively responsible for coordinating the activities
of. all its contractors, including S onsor's Contractor(s) hereunder.
engaged in its development program, ~D~ this regard, it is specifically
understood and agreed that a preconstruction conference(s) shall be
arranged for and scheduled by Sponsor and District personnel shall be
invited to attend and participate in any and all such preconstruction
conferences cDncerning the Subject Sewer Facilities to be constructed and
the other work to be performed by Sponsor's Contractor(s) hereunder.
It shall also be the responsibility of the Sponsor and Sponsor's
Contractor(s) to hold safety conferences as required by law.
At or prior to the above provided for preconstruction conference(s),
Sponsor shall officially, in writing, designate those who have authority
to represent Sponsor, relative to the furnishing and construction/
installation of the Subject Sewer Facilities and shall imediately advise
the District of any subsequent changes in such authorized representation.
City Street and/or County Road Department Construction and Operate and
Maintain Permits for the Sub.iect Sewer Facilities
For those portions, if any, of the Subject Sewer Facilities which are to
be constructed/installed by Sponsor's Contractor(s) within an existing
City street and/or County road, Sponsor, at its expense and in accord with
the schedule requirements set forth in Subparagraph-E,A, of this
Agreement, shall be responsible for obtaining a Construction Permit from
the involved city or the Riverside County Road Department (as appropriate)
covering the construction and installation of the involved facilities. At
the same time such Construction Permit is obtained by Sponsor, the
involved city or the Riverside County Road Department (as appropriate)
will issue an Operate and Maintain Permit to District, which will become
effective upon the completion of the involved Subject Sewer Facilities by
Sponsor's Contractor(s) and District's acceptance thereof for ownership,
operation and maintenance and provision of service purposes.
Easements Involvino the Private Property of Others
For those portions, i f any, of the Subject Sewer Faci 1 i ti es, i ncl udi ng
access roads, which are to be constructed and/or graded by Sponsor's
Contractor(s) within and across private property not owned by S onsor,
including those facilities, if any, which will ultimately be ~ocated
within future public streets, Sponsor shall, in accord with the schedule
4 EXHIBIT D
9)
requ]remenl:s sel: Torl:n 1n 5uDparagrapn D.~. ol ~i~ ~,:::~,:,,~. .,,
cos~ to Dis~ri~. furnish to Distri~ an eas~en~ docmen~'~T:
satisfactory to O~s~ric: as to the location and width of the ~nvolvec
eas~ent parcel(s) and the con~en~ and fore of the easement dockend(s).
which has(have) been duly ~t~ by ~e ~nvo]ved property ~ner(s) anc
which assure(s) Ois~rict's unequ~vocal right to own. operate. ma~n.
replace. repair and provide service through the ~nvolved port~on(~) he
Subjec~ S~er Facilities.
Easements Involvino Soonsor Owned Lands
For those portions of the Subject Sewer Facilities. including access
roads. which are to be constructed and/or graded by Sponsor's
Contractor(s). within and across property owned by Sponsor. inctudinc
those facilities which will ultimately be located within'future publi~
streets. Sponsor shall. in accord with the schedule requirements set forth
in Subparagraph 5.B. of this Agreement. ~thout cost to District. furnish
to District an easement document(s). satisfactory to District as to the
location and width of the involved easement parcel(s) and the content and
'form of the easement document(s). which has(have) been duty executed by
Sponsor and which assure(s) District's unequivocal right to own. operate.
maintain. replace. repair and provide service through the involved
portion(s) of the Subject Sewer Facilities.
10) Grant Deeds Involvino the Private Property of Others
Sponsor. for the dollar consideration, if any, set forth in Exhibit C
(Preliminary Estimate of Cost for the Subject Sewer Facilities) attached
to this Agreement (which dollar consideration shall constitute a part of
the Final Total Cost of the Subject Sewer Facilities covered by this
Agreement), shall, in accord with the schedule requirements set forth in
Subparagraph 5.C. of this Agreement, furnish to District a Grant ~'~-d
document(s), satisfactory to District as to content and form, h
has(have) been duly executed by the involved property owner(s), conveying
to District clear unencumbered fee title to the parcel(s) of land shown on
the map attached to this Agreement as Exhibit G for the purpose(s)
described on said Exhibit G, if applicable for the purposes of this
Agreement.
11) Grant Deeds Involvino Lands of Sponsor
Sponsor. for the dollar consideration. if any. set forth in Exhibit C
(Preliminary Estimate of Cost for the Subject Sewer Facilities} attached
to this Agreement (which dollar consideration shall constitute a part of
the Final Total Cost of the Subject Sewer Facilities covered by this
Agreement). shall, in accord with the schedule requirements set forth in
Subparagraph 5.C. of this Agreement. furnish to District a Grant Deed
document(s). satisfactory to District as to content and form. which
has(have) ~een duly executed by Sponsor. conveying to District clear
unencumbered fee title to the parcel(s) of land shown on the map attached
to this Agreement as Exhibit H for the purpose(s) described on said
Exhibit H. if applicable for the purposes of this Agreement.
5 EXHI O
1Z) $eDarate Cost Accountlna Recoras
To. among other things. accommodate District's -sewer system cosZ
capitalization records and facilitate the determination by District of the
Final Total (actual) Cost of each segment/unit of the Subject Sever
Facilities covered bythis Agreement. Sponsor shall establish and maintain
individual separate accounting records under which all its engineering.
furnishing and construction/installation expenses (excluding Sponsor's
accounting expenses related to the Subject Sewer Facilities) related to
the furnishing and construction/installation of each segment/unit of the
Subject Sewer Facilities to be furnished and constructed/installed by
Sponsor's Contractor(s) will be clearly individually shown and identified.
13)
Furnishino of Cost Accountina Records to District
As a prerequisite to 'becoming eligible to receive the Credits toward
payment of applicable nonreimbursable and potentially reimbursable
District Charges pursuant to the provisions of Paragraph g. of this
Agreement. Sponsor shall, within 90 days after completion of construction
of all of the Subject Sewer Facilities by Sponsor's Contractor(s) and the
written acceptance thereof by District for ownership, operation.
maintenance and provision of service purposes, furnish to District an
accounting report (based upon and accompanied by the above required
Sponsor's individual cost accounting records), which is satisfactory to
Di strict as to form, content and documentati on. showing Sponsor' s tota 1
actual incurred engineering, furnishing and construction/installation
costs for each segment/unit of the Subject Sewer Facilities.
14) Conveyance of Ownership
Concurrentlywith its execution of thisAgreement, Sponsor shall, without
cost to District. execute and deliver to Oistrict the Bill of Sale. which
is attached to this Agreement as Exhibit F, conveying clear title to the
Subject Sewer Facilities to be furnished and constructed/installed by
Sponsor's Contractor(s) pursuant to this Agreement effective upon the
completion of said Subject Sewer Facilities and the acceptance thereof by
District for ownership, operation and maintenance and provision of service
purposes. In this regard, it is specifically understood and agreed that
District shall not be obligated to accept such title or to operate and
rovide service through said Subject Sewer Facilities until satisfactory
inal inspection, including television inspection, and testing thereof by
District's inspection personnel has been completed and Sponsor has fully
complied with all its obligations and res onsibilities rovided for in
this Agreement and District's applicable ~les and Regulations. all as
determined by District.
15) Payments to District to Cover Oistrict's Enaineerino and Insoection
Exoenses and Furnishina and Construction Retated Exoenses
Concurrently with its execution of this document, Sponsor shall make
payment to District in the respective amounts provided for in
Subparagraphs 6.A. and 6.B. of this Agreement to cover:
a)
District's estimated engineering and construction inspection related
expenses incurred pursuant to the provisions of Subparagraph B.2)
hereinbelow: and
6 EXHIBIT D
expenses incurred pursuant to the provisions of Subparagrapfi B.3)
here1 nbet ow.
which payments to District shall be subject to additional billing(s) tc
Sponsor. which Sponsor shall pay within fifteen (15) calendar days oi<he
date thereof. or refund(s) by District. which shall accompany D/st 's
final cost accounting report to Sponsor. to result in Sponsor's payms.._ of
District's actual incurred costs. as provided for in Subparagraph 8.2) and
8.3) hereinbelow. Such payment(s) to District of District's actual
incurred costs shall constitute a portion of Sponsor's costs to be
included in Sponsor's separate cost accDunting records provided for
requi red by Subparagraph A. 12) hereinabove.
16) The Furnishino of an Irrevocable Instrument 'of Credit
In order to guarantee payment of its Financial Participation in the cost
of the Subject Sewer Facilities. as provided for in Subparagraph A.I)
herei nabove. and payment of Di Strict' s incurred engi neeri ng and
constructi on i nspecti on tel ated and material s furni shi ng and constructi on
tel ated expenses resu1 ti ng from District' s ful fi 1 lment of its
responsibilities under this Agreement and to insure District's ability to
complete the Subject Sewer Facilities. pursuant to the provisions of
Paragraph 10. of this Agreement. in the event Sponsor and/or Sponsor's
Contractor(s) do(es) not so complete them as herein envisioned and
provided for Sponsor shall concurrently with the execution of this
Agreement. fu~'nish District with an Irrevocable Instrument of Credit. or
other security satisfactory to District in the initial amount provided for
in Subparagraph 5.G. of this Agreement. which initial amount may be
reduced periodically. as portions of the Subject Sewer Facilities are
satisfactorily completed and the attendant costs are paid by Sponsor. to
cover Sponsor's then estimated share of the remaining costs of ~
uncompleted portions of the Subject Sewer Facilities. as estimat~ ~
approved by District. Such Irrevocable Instrument of Credit shal~ oe
satisfactory to District. as to form and content and the involved
financial institution. and shall remain in full force and effect until all
of the Subject Sewer Facilities have been completed by Sponsor's
Contractor(s): Sponsor has fulfilled all of its financial participation
and other obligations and responsibilities hereunder: and District has
accepted the Subject Sewer Facilities for ownership. operation and
maintenance and provision of service purposes.
17) The Furnishino of Environmental Information and Assistance
Sponsor shall. at its sole expense. upon request by District. furnish
District with such information as District deems reasonably necessary for
the preparation of an Environmental i~n!r~ct Assessment. or. if necessary.
as determined by District. Sponsor sh . at its sole expense. furnish to
District a complete Environmental I~actReport relative to the facilities
covered by t~is Agreement and the Subject Development. Notwithstanding the
foregoing. in the event District is prevented from carrying out its
responsibilities hereunder by reason of an act of God or other reasons
beyond District's control. including but not limited to regulatory agency
or legal actions involving environmental considerations. then District is
relieved of its obligations and responsibilities under this Agreement. In
this regard. nothing herein contained shall be construed or interpreted to
7 EXHIL )
require IJ1ST~I'lC~ CO [.aKe or par~lclpa~e lrl tiny ~c--ga, ab.,u~ ,~, ~.,=
purpose of securing approval for the facilities covered by tins Agreemenu
or the developments to be served thereby. A11 such 1 ega 1 acti on sha 11 be
solely financed and conducted by. Sponsor.
18)
Sponsor Holdina District Harmtess
Sponsor hereby agrees to indemnify and hold District harmless frbm any and
all claims for damage or damages to property or injuries to persons
arising by reason of or in any m~nner connected with the operations
covered by this Agreement that are to be performed by other than personnel
and equipment supplied directly by District or a contractor(s) employed by
District. Such indemnification shall include attorney's fees and court
costs.
19) Payment of Applicable District Charaes
Sponsor shall. if designated' a plicabie in Subparagraph 2.Q. of this
Agreement. as a prerequisite con~iition for receiving sewer service through
the Subject Sewer Facilities and in addition to its Final Financial
Participation in the Final Total Cost of the Subject Sewer Facilities. pay
to District those of the following District Charges which are determined
applicable by District:
a)
Nonreimbursable Basic and/or Special Sewer Frontage Charges. as
provided for in Subparagraph 6.C. and 6.D.. respectively. of this
Agreement:
b)
Sewer System and Disposal Faci l ities Financial Patti ci pati on Charges.
as provided for i n Subparagraph 6. E. of this Agreement: and
c)
Sewer Treatment Plant Capacity Financial Participation Charges as
provided for in Subparagraph 6.F. of this Agreement.
20) Billino to District for District's Fixed Financial Participation
In the event the provisions of Subparagraph 4.C of this Agreement provide
for District Fixed'Financial Participation in ~e Final Total Cost of the
Subject Sewer Facilities. Sponsor shall within thirty (30). calendar days
after completion of the constructionZinstallation of the Subject Sewer
Facilities by Sponsor's Contractor(s) and District's acceptance thereof
for ownershi. operation and maintenance and provision of service
purposes. bi 1 ? of District's Fixed Final Financi at
the
amount
Di strict for
Participation provided for in said Subparagraph 4.C.
District shall. assuming such billing by Sponsor is in proper order. remit
payment of its Fixed Final Financial Participation to Sponsor within
fifteen (15} calendar days after receipt of the billing therefor from
Sponsor. ,
21) Improvement District Annexation/Formation Legal Proceedino Reouirements
In accord with applicable District Rules. Regulations and Policy. Sponsor
shall. if the lands to be occupied by the Subject Development are not
already located within a District improvement district and if designated
applicable in Subparagraphs 2.S.. 2.T. and 5.H. of this Agreement. furnish
8 EXHIBIT D
CO U1Si~rlCl~ a petll~lon (on a (~ocumen; form Furnished Dy uls;rlc~j. wn~cn
has been duly executed by the legal owners of all the involved lands.
requesting either. as determined by District. annexation of the lands to
be occupied by the Subject Development to the appropriate existing
District improvement district or the formation of a new District
improvement district which includes said involved lands as provided f~--in
Subparagraph 5.H. of this Agreement.
22) Assessment District ReQuirements
In accord with applicable District Policy, Rules and Regulations, and
if designated applicable in Subparagraph 2.U.. Sponsor shall, if the
lands to be occupied by the Subject Development are in one of the
District's assessment districts and there has been .a subdivision of
the subject property subsequent to 'said' assessment district
formation, pay the assessment at the time of agreement execution or
go through an apporti onment of. assessment di strict procedures
administered by the Assessment District Coordinator.
b)
Upon completion of the construction of the involved assessment
district financed facilities and the determination of the final
combined and individua] cash assessments, the District shall
determine and establish the mount of the portion, if any, of the
cash assessment for each assessment parcel within the involved
assessment district which is to be credited by District toward
partial payment of applicable District front footage and financial
partici pati on charges.
23) Street Addresses
Sponsor shall concurrently with its execution and delivery of t~
Agreement to District (or as soon thereafter as possible) furnisr
District a list of approved street addresses for the Lots/Units of
Tract/Development to be served by the Subject Sewer Facilities.
24) Soecial Terms. Conditions and/or Reouirements
Sponsor shall fulfill, comply with and/or perform (as appropriate) all
Special Terms. Conditions and Requirements provided for-in Exhibit I
attached to this Agreement (if indicated as applicable in Subparagraph
2.W. of this Agreement).
8. DISlt~ICT'S OBLIGAI'IONS/RESPONSIBILITIES
District shall fulfill and/or perform each and all of the followingset forth
obligations and responsibilities which have been designated as 'Applicable for
the Purposes of this Agreement" in Paragraph 3. of this Agreement:
1)
Fixed Financi,al Participation in the Final Total Cost of the Sub.iect Sewer
Faci 1 ities
Provided funds for that purpose are available. as determined by District.
in accord with the provisions of Section 9.04 of District's Amended Rules
and Regulations Governing the Provision of Sewer System Facilities and
Service.~District's Fixed (not subject to future development) Financial
Participation in the Final Total Cost of the Subject Sewer Facilities
9 EXHIBI.
2)
the capacity (over and above the size and capacity necessary to serve
Sponsor's Subject Development) of portions of the Subject Sewer Faci l iti es
to be in accord with the District's sewer system planning for the involveO
District improvement district or service area. all as determined by
District. The amount of such District Financial Participation.. if any.
shall be set forth in Subparagraph 4.C. of this Agreement.
Plan Review and ADDrOyal and Construction Inspection
District shall review the design and detailed construction plans and
specifications prepared by Sponsor's Engineer(s) for the Subject Sewer
Facilities submitted. pursuant to the provisions of Subparagraph A.2)
f
hereinabove: inspect and test the facilities to be urnished and installed
by Sponsor's Contractor(s) under this Agreement. pursuant to the
provi s ions of Subparagraph A. 4) herei nabove: parti ci pate i n
preconstruction conference(s) and activity coordination activities.
pursuant to the provisions of Subparagraph A.6} hereinabove: cooperate
with Sponsor relative to easements. permits and/or fee title acquisitions.
pursuant to Subparagraphs A. 7). A.8). A.9). A. lO} and A.11) hereinabove.
as applicable: and all other obligations and responsibilities under this
Agreement. except those associated with District's Fixed Financial
Participation in the Final Total Cost of the Subject Sewer Facilities. on
an actual cost basis.
In this regard. Sponsor has heretofore made and/or shall make payment(s)
to District. to cover District's estimated expenses. pursuant to the
provisions of Subparagraph A.15)a) hereinabove and Subparagraph 6.A. of
this Agreement. with the understanding that the total aggr ate amount of
such payments based on estimated District expenses sh~l. lowing
fol
completion of the Subject Sewer Facilities and the final determination by
District of its actual expenses for each involved segment/unit of the
Subject Sewer Facilities. be subject to additional billing Cif the amount
of the actual expenses exceeds Sponsor's previous payment[s]) or refund
(if the amount of actual expenses is less than Sponsor's previous
payment[s]}.
Such Sponsor's payment of actual District shall constitute a part
of Sponsor's cost fo;' each segment/unit ofe~een~u~ject Sewer Facilities to
be included as a part of Sponsor's cost accounting report provided for and
requi red by Subparagraph A. 12) hereinabove.
3) Furnishina and Construction of Portions of the Sub,iect Sewer Facilities
Sponsor shall. unless otherwise agreed by District in writing. furnish the
labor. materials. equipment and facilities necessary to connect the
Subject Sewer Facilities to District's existing sewer system facilities
and construct/install other portions of the Subject Sewer Facilities as
provided for in the District approved plans and specifications for the
Subject Sewe~ Facilities. on an actual cost basis (which includes overhead
charges ).
In this regard. Sponsor shall make payment to District. to cover
District's estimated expenses. pursuantto the provisions of Subparagraph
A)lS)b) hereinabove and Subparagraph 6.8. of this Agreement. with the
understanding that the amount of such payment shall. following completion
IO EXHIBIT O
um ui,c ;uud~CC J~v~r rctCl ilI:le5 clrlcl clle [lil~l U~[.~l'li|,iiabiult u.y u,~, .~.~
its actual expenses, be subject to additional billing (if the amount
the actual expenses exceeds Sponsor's previous payment[s]) or refund
the amount of actual expenses is less than Sponsor's previous payment[s]).
Such Sponsor's payment of actual District expenses shall constitute
of Sponsor's cost for each segment of the Subject Sewer Facilities be
included as a part of Sponsor's cost accounting report provided fo, and
required by Subparagraph A.12) hereinabove.
4) Acceotance. Ownership. Ooeratino. Maintenance and Service Responsibilities
Following completion of the Subject Sewer Facilities and the conveyance of
ownership by Sponsor. pursuant to Subparagraph A.14) hereinabove anc
Subparagraph 5.E. of this Agreement. and acceptance of such ownership by
District following such S onsor conveyance and fulfillment of its
obligations and responsibi~ties under this Agreement and District's
applicable Rules and Regulations and.subject to the Applicable Special
Sewer Service Limitations provided for in Paragraph 13. of this Agreement.
District shall own. operate. maintain and assume all responsibilities and
liabilities associated with the Subject Sewer Facilities. under its
involved program. and provide sewer service to the lands. developments and
inhabitants accessible thereto in full accord with and pursuant to its
the rovision of
prevailing Policies and Rules and Regulations Governing P
Sewer System Facilities and Service. as they may be amended from time to
time by District's Board of Directors.
5) Determination of Final Total Costs
Following completion of the Subject Sewer Facilities: District's
acceptance of the Subject Sewer Facilities for ownership. operation a~_nd
maintenance and provision of service purposes: and Sponsor furniF g
District with its accounting report in form. content and docoment~ n
satisfactory to District. pursuant to the provisions and requirements of
Subparagra h A. i3) hereinabove and Subparagraph 5.D. of this Agreement.
District s~all. based on Sponsor furnished and District cost accounting
reports and using appropriate generally accepted cost accounting:
procedures and prudent judgment and excluding S onsor and District
accounting expenses relatedto the Subject Sewer Facilities.
the
determine
Final Total Cost for eachsegment/unit of the Subject Sewer Facilities for
its capital value and other accounting record purposes.
6)
Determination of SDonsor's Final Financial Participation in the Final
Total Cost
Following District's determination of the Final Total Costs pursuant to
Subparagraph 8.5) hereinabove. District shall. as provided for in
Paragraph 8. of this Agreement. determine the amount of Sponsor's Final
Financial Participation in the Final Total Cost of each segment/unit of
the Subject Sewer Facilities for its capital value and other accounting
record purposes.
7) Hold Harmless
District hereby agrees to indemnify and hold Sponsor harmless from any and
all claims for damage or damages to property or injuries to persons
11 EXHIB. ,
covered by t,is Agreement that are to be performed directly Dy ~
personnel and equipment of 01strict or a contractor ~mp]oyed by Distr~ct.
S~c~ ~ndem~f~cation s~a]~ include. but ,or be limited to. attorneys' fees
and court costs.
12 EXHIBIT D
FROI~FAGE CHARGE/SURCHARGE RECEIPT
IX] (CREDITED) [ 1 (PAID)
MEMO NO.
COORD NO.
SO/CO
S.A. NO.
34
Eastern Municipal Water District (District) hereby acknowledges receipt of the followin~
amounts from the below named Party(ies) (Sponsor[s]):
Amount of Percent of
Sponsor(s) Name and Address Payment Total Payment
CITY OF TEMECULA $ 34,065.00 100%
covering the payment of: [ ] Nonreimbursable [X] Potentially Reimbursable [ ] Water [X] Sewer
[ ] Reclaimed Water Related [ ] Basic Frontage [X] Additional Basic Frontage [ ] Special
Frontage [ ] Additional Special Frontage Charges [ ] Water Main Fire Flow Capacity Frontage
Surcharges, under the attached "FRONTAGE CHARGE/SURCHARGE RELATED TERMS AND CONDITIONS" which
are relevant to the particular type of Frontage Charges/Surcharges involved (as above
specified), applicable to the following described parcel(s) of [X] Sponsor [ ] other party
owned land:
Frontage
Brief Legal Description/ L.F. of Charge/Sur- Total
Parcel General Street Location/Tract Number Frontace charee/L.F. Charee
Southside of Pauba Road and east of La
Primavera Street. Plot alone the south
Riqht-of-Way of Pauba Road beqinnine lll8
feet east of La Primavera Street and
extendinq easterly 2271'
2271 $15.00 $34.065.00
/ /
Tot a 1 s
2271 $15.00 $34,065.00
~STERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT
By
John S. Fricker, Director of New Business
Date: / /
Record of Reimbursements and Assiqnments (if applicable)
Sponsor Current Reimbursement
As s i qnment
No. Date Balance
/ / $
/ /
/ /
/ /
Amount
To (Spon. No.)
Amount
$
New
Balance
$
Reimbursement E1 i qi bi 1 i ty Termi nati on Date:/ /
Distribution: NB / M&R:
(Date) (Initial) (Date)
/ LIB:
(Initial)
(Date)
/
(Initial)
FRONTAGE
RECORDS MEMO NO.
COORD NO.
FROIfFAGE CHARGE/SURCHARGE RECEIPT SO/CO
IX] (CREDITIED) [ 1 {PAID) S.A. NO. 34
.astern Municipal Water District (District) hereby acknowledges receipt of the following
amounts from the below named Party(ies) (Sponsor[s]):
Amount of Percent of
Sponsor(s) Name and Address Payment Total Payment
CITY OF TEMECULA $ 34,065.00 100%
covering the payment of: iX] Nonreimbursable [ ] Potentially Reimbursable [ ] Water [X] Sewer
[ ] Reclaimed Water Related [ ] Basic Frontage [ ] Additional Basic Frontage [ ] Special
Frontage [ ] Additional Special Frontage Charges [ ] Water Main Fire Flow Capacity Frontage
Surcharges. under the attached "FRONTAGE CHARGE/SURCHARGE RELATED TERMS AND CONDITIONS" which
are relevant to the particular type of Frontage Charges/Surcharges involved (as above
specified), applicable to the following described parcel(s) of [X] Sponsor [ ] other party
owned land:
Frontage
Brief Legal Description/ L.F. of Charge/Sur- Total
Parcel General Street Location/Tract Number Frontaqe charqe/L.F. Charqe
= .
Northside of Pauba Road and east of La
Primavera Street. Plot alonq the north
Riqht-of-Wav of Pauba Road beqinnina 1118
feet east of La Primavera Street and
extendinq easterly 2271'
2271 $15.00 $34,065.00
/ /
Tota 1 s
2271 $15.00 $34,065.00
EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISll~ICT
By
John S. Fricker, Director of New Business
Record of Reimbursements and Assianments (if applicable)
Sponsor Current ReinU>ursement Assiqnment
No. Date Balance Amount To (SDon. No.)
/ /
/ /
/ /
/ /
Date:__/__/__
$ ~
Amount
$
New
Balance
$
Reimbursement Eliqibilitv Termination Date: / /
~dstribution: NB / : M&R:
(Date) (Initial) (Date)
/
(Initial)
: LIB:
(Date)
/
(Initial)
FRONTAGE
FRONTAGE CHARGE/SURCHARGE RELATED TERMS AND CONDITIONS
WATER RELATED FRONTAGE CHARGES AND SURCHARGES
All nonreimbursable and potentially reimbursable Basic Water Frontage 13WF), Additional Basic Water Frontage ABWF), Special Water Frontage (SWF) and Additiom
Water Frontage (ASWF) Charges and Water Main Fire Flow Capacity Frontage Surcharges (FFCF) are levied and collected by the District in accord with applicable provb,uns
of District's Amended Rules and Regulations Governing the Provision of Wa~r System FaciliUes and Service (Resolution No. 229, as amended, of the District's Board of
Direaors).
SEWER RELATED FRONTAGE CHARGES
All nonreimbursable and potentially reimbursable Basic Sewer Frontage CBSF), Additional Basic Sewer Frontage (ABSF), Special Sewer Frontage (SSF) and Additional Special
St'wet Frontage (ASSF) Charges ate levied and collected by the District in accord with applicable ptovisiom of District's Amended Rules and Reg~a~om Govermng the
Provision of Sewer System Facilities and Service (Resolution No. 1643, as amended, of the District's Board of Dizectors).
FRONTAGE CHARGES SEPARATE FROM AND IN ADDITION TO OTHER CHARGES
All water and sewer related applicable (as determined by the Disaict) Frontage Clurgu ud Surc, Mrges are separate from and in addition to other applicable charges and costs,
including but not limited to water service connection meter, sewer service lateral. Domestic Wa~r System Facilities Financial Participation, SeWer System and Disposal
Facilities Financial Participation and Sewage Treamgnt Plant Capacity Financial Pamcipation Charges and the costs of other facilities required to provide services) for and
to each revolved development.
DIY!'RICT OWNERSHIP
.all water and/or sewer mains dira:zly related to Frontage Charges and Surcharges shall be owned, opera~d aad ma~ained by O~e District.
REIMBURSEMENT TERMS AND CONDITIONS
A. All wak-'r and sewer related BWF, BSF, SV/F and SSF Charge and FFCF Surcharge Iravments shall be nonreimbursable:
B. Water and sewer relszed ABWF. ABSF, ASWF and ASSF Charge navments shah be potentially reimbursable by the District under ~e following terras and
conditions:
(I) No interest will be credited to or paid on any potentially ~le ABW'F, ABSF, ASWF or ASSF Charge retated payment balance;
(2) As and when fig owner(s) or developer(s) of a parcel of land for which potemially reimbursable ABWF, ABSF, ASWF or ASSF Clarges have been
previously paid requests service from snd Um:mgh the related wa~r or sewer facilL-/, the District shall requir~ such owner(s) or developer(s) to pay
appropriau: nonmmbursable BWF, BSF, Sg/F or SSF Charges pursuant to the applicable provisiom of the above-mentioned Amended Rules and
(3) During the ten (10) year peric~l which follows the date of the involved FRONTAGE CHARGE/SURCHARGE RECEIPT, (RECEIFr) as and wt
Districz collects nonreimbursable BWF, BSF, SWF or SSF Charges from the owner(s) or cleveiopff(s) of patoil(s) of land for which po~
r~knbursable A~9/F, ABSF, ASWF or ASSF Charges have been previously paid it will make reimbursement to the Spomor(s) named in the related
ABWF, ABSF, ASW'F or ASSF RECEIFr (or the involved auignee[s]) in an amount equivalent to the pet front foot ~s) set forth in the involved
ABWF, ABSF, ASVv'F or ASSF RECEHrlTM times the involved feet of frontage for which ~le .BWF, BSF, SWF or S,qF Fromage Charges
ate so colle~___-~_ by the District pursuant to 5.B.(2) above;
(4) All such reimbursements of potentially reimbursable ABWF, ABSF, ASWF or ASSF Charges slmil be made by the District to the involved individual
Sponsor(s) natned in the involved RECEIPT, (or the involved assignee[s]) in the percentage(s) of each Spomor's (assignee's) percentage of the_ then
outSt~mdln~e potentially reimbursable balance owing undex the involved RECEIPT;
(5) AJl such reimbunemern shall be limited to ~me which ca~ be made by the District following in razipt of payment(s) of nonteimbunable BWF, BSF,
SWF or SSF Charges, pursuant to 5.B.(3) above, within the zn (10) year period which begins with date of the involved RECEIPT; and
(6') Thep~temia~reimbursab~ebaiancesdueaSp~m~runderaREL~EIFrshaj~bea~signab~et~an~therpany~rpanies~n~yasm~~~a
or amounts then owing, unless otherwise formally appmved in ~ by Districz. Diswict shall chaage it~ records to effect such an a~signme~ respomive
to its receipt and approval of a District furnished 'Reimbursable Bnlnn~e Assignment Notification and Record" form, which has been duly completed and
executed by the involved Assipor and Assignee, ~ which District shall execute the confirmation portion of the "Reimbunable Balance Assignment
NocifK:ation and Record' form and flwaish a copy thereof to both the involved Assignor and Assignee; and
FRONTAGE CHARGE PAYMENTS PERTINENT TO TI~ DESIGNATED PARCEL(S) OF LAND
All nonreimbursable and potemially t~imbursable Frontage Charge and Surcharge payments shall be pertinent to the pan:zl(s) of land designawcl in the involved RECEIPT
and shall not be transferable to any other parcel(s) of laad.
FRONTAGE
MEMO NO.
COORD NO.
SEWER TREA~4ENT PLANT CAPACIT~ SO/CO
FINANCIAL PARTICIPATION CHARGE RECEIPT ID NO. U-8
Eastern Municipal Water District (District) hereby acknowledges receipt of the total
sum of $1,890.00 from CITY OF TEMECULA
covering payment oZ Sewer Treatment Plant Capacity FInancial Participation C~arges
applicable as a prerequisite part of the financial and other arrangements for the
provision of sewer service for [ ] Tract or [ ] the 'FIRE STATION
AT PAUBA ROAD development,
within Dlstr~ct's Improvement D~str~ct No. 22 , wh~c~ Is generally shown on the
map which is attached hereto.
In accord with the provisions of Resolutions Nos. 1599 and 1600, both as amended, of
District's Board of Directors, said $Deferred * total payment by Sponsor has been
computed as follows: Sewer Treat-
Type of Development
1) Single Family Ind.
Residential
2) Single Family Apartment
(Permanent Occupancy)
- Retirement
- Family
- Studio/1 Bdrm
3) Motels and Hotels
(Transient Occupancy)
No. of DU's Charge/
/Units/ DU/Unit/
Students Student
$1890.00 $
1420.00
1890.00
1420.00
850.00
ment .Plant
Capacity Fin.
Part. Charge*
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
9)
Rental Type Mobile
Home Parks
(Permanent Occupancy)
- Retirement
- Family
Mobile Homes on
Individual Lots
- Retirement
- Family
Recreational Vehicle
Park
small commercial
Development
All Other Commer-
cial Development
Schools - Elementary
- Junior High
- High Schools & Colleges
TOTAL SEWER TREATMENT PLANT CAPACITY
FINANCIAL PARTICIPATION CHARGES
1
(By Special Study)'
EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT
By
John S. FrlcKer, Dlrectok o~ Customer Service
1420.00
1890.00
1420.00
1890.00
850.00
1890.00
1890.00
96.00
120.50
144.50
Duted:
$ 1890.00
/ /
Subject to future adjustment responsive to the provisions of Subparagraph
16.B. of the Standard Sewer Facilities and/or Service Agreement to which this
Receipt is related or in the event of changes in the type of development
and/or service requirements, all as determined by District.
StRTPCAP
SEllER SYSllEM AND DISPOSAL FACILITIES FINANCIAL
PARTICIPATION CHARGE RECEIPT.
(PAID)*
BASIC
MEMO NO.
COORD NO.
SO/CO
ID NO.
U-8
Eastern Municipal Water District (District) hereby acknowledges receipt of the total
sum of $ 1955.00 from CITY OF TEMECULA
covering payment of Sewer System and Disposal Facilities Financial Participation
Charges applicable as a prerequisite part of the financial and other arrangements for
the provision of sewer system facilities and service for [ ] Tract or
[ ] the PAUBA ROAD FIRE STATION
development]within District's Improvement District No. U-8 which is generality shown
on the map which is attached hereto.
In accord with the provisions of Resolutions Nos.
District's Board of Directors. said $1955.00
computed as follows:
Type of Development
No. of DU's
/Units/
Students
1) Single Family Ind.
Residential
1641 and 1642. both as amended. of
_* total payment by Sponsor has been
Sewer System
Charge/ and Disposal
DU/Unit/ Facilities Fin.
Student Part. Charqe
1 $1955.00 $1955.00
2) Single Family Apartment
(Permanent Occupancy)
- Retirement
- Family
- Studio/1 Bdrm.
3) Motels and Hotels
(Transient Occupancy
1466 O0
1955.00
1466.00
880.00
4)
Rental Type Mobile
Home Parks
(Permanent Occupancy)
- Retirement
- Family
1466.00
19'55.00
5)
Mobile Homes on
Individual Lots
Retirement
'Family
1466.00
1955.00
6)
7)
Recreational Vehi cl e
Park
Small Commercial
Development
880.00
1955.00
8)
9)
All Other Commer-
cial Development
Schools
Elementary
Junior High
High Schools & Colleges
(By Special Study)
99.31
124.73
149.56
I SWRBAC1
TOTAL SEWER SYSTEM AND DISPOSAL FACILITIES
FINANCIAL PARTICIPATION CHARGES
$ 1955.00
(a)*
(a) COVERED BY:
(1) SPONSOR'S PAYMENT IN THE AMOUNT OF
(2) DISTRICT'S FINANCIAL PARTICIPATION UNDER
THIS AGREEMENT PURSUANT TO EXHIBIT E
(3) CREDIT TO SPONSOR PURSUANT TO AGREEMENT WITH SPONSOR
DATED
(4) CREDIT ASSIGNED TO SPONSOR PURSUANT TO AGREEMENT WITH
DATED
(5) APPLICABLE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. PURSUANT TO:
RESOLUTION NO. .. :
MINUTE ORDER ; OR.
AGREEMENT WITH
DATED
(6) APPLICABLE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO.
RESOLUTION NO.
MINUTE ORDER OR
AGREEMENT WITH ,
DATED
PURSUANT TO:
.,
OR
TOTAL COMBINED AMOUNT OF PAYMENT AND CREDITS
$ 1955.00
NOTE: SEE THE AI'FACHED "CREDIT DESCRIPTION/COMPUTATION" EXHIBIT FOR FURTHER CREDIT
RELATED DETAILS
EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT
By Date:__/__/__
**
John S. Fri cker, Di rector of New Busi ness
Subject to future adjustment responsive to the provisions of Subparagraph 16.B.
of the Standard Sewer Facilities and/or ServiceAgreement to which this Receipt
is related or in the event of changes in the type of development and/or service
requirements, all as determined by District.
APPLICABLE FOR THE SCHEDULE OF CHARGES SET FORTH ON EXHIBIT A AI'FACHED TO
RESOLUTION NO. 1642.12 ONLY
2 SWRBAC1
BILL OF
For a valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,
CITY OF TEMECULA -FIRE STATION (PAUBA ROAD)
(Seller), hereby bargains, conveys, and grants unto the Eastern
Municipal Water District (District), a public agency of the State of
California, the'following described personal property, such conveyance
to become effective upon completion of.the construction/installation
by Seller's Contractor(s) and acceptance by the District of such
personal property, which is more specifically described as:
The Subject Sewer Facilities which are to be. furnished and
constructed by Sponsor's Contractor(s) as described and
provided for in that certain'Agreement, by and between Sponsor
(Seller in this Bill of Sale) and District, dated
, to which this Bill of Sale is attached as
Exhibit F.
Seller hereby warrants that the above-described personal property is
free and clear of any and all encumbrances. In this regard Seller
hereby agrees to protect and defend (District's) right to own, operate,
maintain and provide services through all the personal property hereby
transferred to District's ownership wherein the defense of the
District's right to own, operate, maintain and provide services as
provided hereinabove results from any person or entity's alleged rights
to any of the personal property described hereinabove or for any
monetary damages resulting from the nonpayment by Seller of any person
or entity having the right to file a lien against said personal
property. Seller further agrees to indemnify the District for any and
all losses which may be occasioned or suffered by the District as a
result of any claims by others as to clear title of the personal
property covered hereby.
Subscribed and sworn to before
me this day of
19_.
Notary Public in and for the
State of California
Expiration Date
(Type name and Title)
By
(Signature)
(Type Name and Title)
(Mailing Address)
Date
EXHIBIT F
ITEM 22
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE DIRE .T
CITY MANAG~
City Council/City Manager
; ~,r.,Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works\City Engineer
February 13, 1996
Award of Contract for the FY94-95 Annual Pavement Management
Project, Project No. PW95-06
PREPARED BY: /i~ Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects
Scott Harvey, Associate Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council:
Award a contract for the construction of the FY94-95 Annual Pavement Management
Project, Project No. PW95-06 to Clovis Paving & Sealing, Inc, for $653,929.15and
authorize the Mayor to execute the contract.
Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency
amount of $65,392.92 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount.
BACKGROUND:
On November 14, 1995 City Council approved the construction plans and specifications, and
authorized the Department of Public Works to solicit public construction bids for the FY94-95
Annual Pavement Management Project, Project No. PW95-06. The project plans and
specifications are proposing two (2) types of pavement rehabilitation which include and
asphalt overlay with a stress relief membrane (geotextile fabric), and the removal &
reconstruction of the existing asphalt pavement. There are fifteen (15) roadway segments to
be rehabiiitated, four (4) are arterial, which includes potions of Margarita Road, Pala Road,
Rancho California Road and Ynez Road, and eleven (11 ) are secondary/local residential streets
at various location throughout the City.
This is the city's first Annual Pavement Management Project. Each year the city receives
Measure A funds to improve the quality of the City roadways. This project was separated into
the base bid and three alternates to maximize the amount of work proposed for each street
section with the available funds allocated to this year's project. The base bid included the
major streets, which are Margarita Road, Rancho California, Pala Road and portions of Ynez
Road. Alternative 1 will complete the remaining portion of Ynez Road (just north and south
of Pauba Road). Alternative 2 includes the minor streets, which are Pauba Road, Commerce
Center, and Las Haciendas. Alternative 3 includes all of the residential streets for this years
project.
The engineer's estimate for the base bid is $620,00.
pwO4~agdt~t\96\0213 \pw95-06 .awd
Ten (10) bids for the project were publicly opened on January 25, 1996 and the results for
the base bid are as follows:
No. CONTRACTOR BASE BID ALT. I ALT. 2 ALT. 3
($) ($) ($) ($)
I Clovis Paving & Sealing, 493,601.05 91,192.65 69,135.45 55,301.10
Inc.
2 Hillcrest Contracting, Inc. 536,399.90 104,728.20 74,079.60 66,092.50
3 R.J. Noble Company
541,623.80 101,868.70 71,421.20 57,094.10
4 Industrial Asphalt
559,167.25 108,483.25 73,275.70 71,336.50
5 Highgrade Engineering, 571,388.53 98,857.38 77,098.19 69,498.33
Inc.
6 All American Asphalt
583,142.00 105,152.00 74,219.25 61,980.50
7 Laird Construction Co.,
Inc.
589,529.60 106,932.30 74,485.85 66,167.50
8 Palomar Grading &
Paving, Inc.
606,698.20 114,238.50 94,079.25 74,465.00
9 Matich Corporation
622,600.00 118,000.00 82,099.50 80,900.00
10 Silvia Construction, Inc. 678,407.90 138,489.10 80,381.20 80,636.50
Staff recommends the awarding of the base bid, alternative 1, and alternative 2, with the
remaining streets to be included in next fiscal years program. Clovis Paving & Sealing, Inc.,
has not performed any work for the City, but has preformed well in other areas of California
based on comments from references of previous work.
The construction schedule is for 115 working days. Work is expected to begin mid-March,
1996 and be completed in August, 1996.
A copy of the bid summary is available for review in the City Engineer's office.
FISCAL IMPACT:
This is a Capital Improvement Project and will be funded by Measure A. Funds are available
for the construction contact and contingency amounts of $653,929.15 and $65,392.92,
respectively in Account No. 210-165-655-5804.
Attachment
Contract
pwO4\agdrpt\96\02 13\pw95-06 .awd
FY94-95 STREETS
CITY OF TEMECULA
PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
CONTRACT
FOR
PROJECT NO. PW95-06
FY94/95 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
THIS CONTRACT, made and entered 'into the 13th day of February, 1996, by and
between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CITY", and
Clovis Paving & Sealing, Inc., hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR."
WITNESSETH:
That CITY and CONTRACTOR, for the consideration hereinafter named, mutually agree
as follows:
1.8.
CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The complete Contract includes all of the Contract
Documents, to wit: Notice Inviting Bids, Instructions to Bidders, Proposal, Performance
Bond, Labor and Materials Bond, Plans and Specifications entitled PROJECT NO. PW95-
06 FY94195 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM, Insurance Forms, this Contract, and
all modifications and amendments thereto, the State of California Department of
Transportation Standard Specifications (1992 Ed.) where specifically referenced in the
Plans and Technical Specifications, and the latest version of the Standard Specifications
for Public Works Construction, including all supplements as written and promulgated
by the Joint Cooperative Committee of the Southern California Chapter of the American
Associated General Contractors of California (hereinafter, "Standard Specifications")
as amended by the General Specifications, Special Provisions, and Technical
Specifications for PROJECT NO, PW95-06 FY94/95 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
SYSTEM. Copies of these Standard Specifications are available from the publisher:
Building News, Incorporated
3055 Overland Avenue
Los Angeles, California 90034
(213) 202-7775
The Standard Specifications will C0ntrQI the general provisions, construction materials,
and construction methods for this Contract except as amended by the General,
Specifications, Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications for Project No. PW95-
06 FY94/95 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM.
In case of conflict between the Standard Specifications and the other Contract
Documents, the other Contract Documents shall take precedence over and be used in
lieu of such conflicting portions.
Where the Contract Document describe portions of the work in general terms, but not
in complete detail, it is understood that the item is to be furnished and installed
completed and in place and that only the best general practice is to be used. Unless
otherwise specified, the CONTRACTOR shall furnish all labor, materials, tools,
equipment, and incidentals, and do all the work involved in executing the Contract.
CONTRACT CA-1 r:\cip\projects\pw95-06\contract.doc
e
e
The Contract Documents are complementary, and what is called for by anyone shall be
as binding as if called for by all. Any conflict between this Contract and any other
Contract Document shall be resolved in favor of this Contract.
SCOPE OF WORK. CONTRACTOR shall perform everything required to be performed,
shall provide and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable
equipment, and all utility and transportation services required for the following:
PROJECT NO. PW95-06 FY94/95 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
All of said work to be performed and materials to be furnished shall be in strict
accordance with the Drawings and Specifications and the provisions of the Contract
Documents hereinabove enumerated and adopted by CITY.
CITY APPROVAL. All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be furnished
and work performed and completed under the direction and supervision and subject to
the approval of CITY or its authorized representatives.
CONTRACT AMOUNT AND SCHEDULE. CITY agrees to pay and CONTRACTORagrees
to accept in full payment for the work above-agreed to be done, the sum of: Six
hundred ;;;hf-three thousand nine hundred twenty-nine DOLLARS and 15 CENTS
($653,929.15),the total amount of the base bid.
CONTRACTOR agrees to complete the work in a period not to exceed ONE HUNDRED
AND FIFTEEN (115)working days, commencing with delivery of Notice to Proceed by
CITY. Construction shall not commence until bonds and insurance are approved by
CITY.
CHANGE ORDERS. All change orders shall be approved by the City Council, except
that the City Manager is hereby authorized by the City Council to make, by written
order, changes or additions to the work in an amount not to exceed the contingency
as established by the City Council.
PAYMENTS.
LUMP SUM BID SCHEDULE:
Ae
Before submittal of the first payment request, the CONTRACTOR shall submit
to the City Engineer a schedule of values allocated to the various portions of the
work, prepared in such form and supported by such data to substantiate its
accuracy as the City Engineer may require. This schedule, as approved by the
City Engineer, shall be used as the basis for reviewing the CONTRACTOR's
payment requests.
UNIT PRICE BID SCHEDULE:
Pursuant to Section 20104.50 of the Public Contracts Code, within thirty (30)
days after submission of a payment request to the City, the CONTRACTOR shall
be paid a sum equal to ninety percent (90%) of the value of the work completed
according to the bid schedule. Payment request forms shall be submitted on or
about the thirtieth (30th) day of each successive month as the work progresses.
The final payment, if unencumbered, or any part thereof unencumbered, shall be
CONTRACT CA-2 r:\cil~\projects\pw95-06\contract.doc
made sixty (60) days after acceptance of final payment and the CONTRACTOR
filing a one-year Warranty and an Affidavit of Final Release with the CITY on
forms provided by the CITY.
Ca
Payments shall be made on demands drawn in the manner required by law,
accompanied by a certificate signed by the City Manager, stating that the work
for which payment is demanded has been performed in accordance with the
terms of the Contract, and that the amount stated in the certificate is due under
the terms of the Contract. Partial payments on the Contract price shall not be
considered as an acceptance Of any part of the work.
Interest shall be paid on all undisputed payment requests not paid within 30
days pursuant to Public Contracts Code Section 20104.50. Public Contracts
Code Section 7107 is hereby incorporated by reference.
WARRANTY RETENTION. Commencing with the date the Notice of Completion is
recorded, the CITY shall retain a portion of the Contract award price, to assure
warranty performance and correction of construction deficiencies according to the
following schedule:
CONTRACT AMOUNT
$25,000-$75,000
$75,000-$500,000
Over $500,000
RETENTION PERIOD
180 days
180 days
One Year
RETENTION PERCENTAGE
3%
$2,250 + 2% of amount in
excess of $75,000
$10,750 + 1% of amount
in excess of $500,000
LIQUIDATED DAMAGES; EXTENSION OF TIME. In accordance with Government Code
Section 53069.85, CONTRACTOR agrees to forfeit and pay to CITY the sum of One
Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00) per day for each calendar day completion is delayed
beyond the time allowed pursuant to Paragraph 4 of this Contract. Such sum shall be
deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. Such sum
shall be deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR.
CONTRACTOR will be granted an extension of time and will not be assessed liquidated
damages for unforeseeable delays beyond the control of and without the fault or
negligence of the CONTRACTOR including delays caused by CITY. CONTRACTOR is
required to promptly notify CITY of any such delay.
6
WAIVER OF CLAIMS. On or before making each request for payment under Paragraph
6 above, CONTRACTOR shall submit to CITY, in writing, all claims for compensation
as to work related to the payment. Unless the CONTRACTOR has disputed the amount
of the payment, the acceptance by CONTRACTOR of each payment shall constitute a
release of all claims against the CITY related to the payment. CONTRACTOR shall be
required to execute an affidavit, release and indemnity agreement with each claim for
payment.
10.
PREVAILING WAGES. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code
of the State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate. of
per diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for
CONTRACT CA-3 r:\cip\projects\pw95-O6\contract.doc
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
each craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contract, from
the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. These rates are on file with the
City Clerk. Copies may be obtained at cost at the City Clerk's office of Temecula.
CONTRACTOR shall post a copy of such wage rates at the job site and shall pay the
adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. CONTRACTOR shall comply with the
provisions of Sections 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor
Code.
Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, CONTRACTOR shall forfeit to
the CITY, as a penalty, the sum of $25.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof,
for each laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing
rates for any work done under this Contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him,
in violation of the provisions of the Contract.
TIME OF THE ESSENCE. Time is of the essence in this contract.
INDEMNIFICATION. All work covered by this Contract done at the site of construction
or in preparing or delivering materials to the site shall be at the risk of CONTRACTOR
alone. CONTRACTOR agrees to save, indemnify, hold harmless and defend CITY, its
officers, employees, and agents, against any and all liability, injuries, Or death of
persons (CONTRACTOR'semployees included) and damage to property, arising directly
or indirectly out of the obligations herein undertaken or out of the operations conducted
by CONTRACTOR, save and except claims or litigations arising through the sole active
negligence or sole willful misconduct of the CITY.
GRATUITIES. CONTRACTOR warrants that neither it nor any of its employees, agents,
or representatives has offered or given any gratuities or promises to CITY's employees,
agents, or representatives with a view toward securing this Contract or securing
favorable treatment with respect thereto.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST. CONTRACTOR warrants that he has no blood or marriage
relationship, and that he is not in any way associated with any City officer or
employee, or any architect, engineer, or other preparers of the Drawings and
Specifications for this project. CONTRACTOR further warrants that no person in his/her
employ has been employed by the CITY within one year of the date of the Notice
Inviting Bids.
CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT. After the completion of the work contemplated by this
Contract, CONTRACTOR shall file with the City Manager his affidavit stating that all
workmen and persons employed, all firms supplying materials, and all subcontractors
upon the Project have been paid in full, and that there are no claims outstanding against
the Project for either labor or materials, except certain items, if any, to be set forth in
an affidavit covering disputed claims or items in connection with a Stop Notice which
has been filed under the provisions of the laws of the State of California.
NOTICE TO CITY OF LABOR DISPUTES. Whenever CONTRACTOR has knowledge that
any actual or potential labor dispute is delaying or threatens to delay the timely
performance of the Contract, CONTRACTOR shall immediately give notice thereof,
including all relevant information with respect thereto, to CITY.
BOOKS AND RECORDS. CONTRACTOR's books, records, and plans or such part
thereof as may be engaged in the performance of this Contract, shall at all reasonable
CONTRACT CA-4 r:\cip\projects\pw95-O6\contract.doc
times be subject to inspection and audit by any authorized representative of the CITY.
18.
INSPECTION. The work shall be subject to inspection and testing by CITY and its
authorized representatives during manufacture and construction and all other times and
places, including without limitation, the plans of CONTRACTOR and any of its
suppliers. CONTRACTOR shall provide all reasonable facilities and assistance for the
safety and convenience of inspectors. All inspections and tests shall be performed in
such manner as to not unduly delay the work. The work shall be subject to final
inspection and acceptance notwithstanding any payments or other prior inspections.
Such final inspection shall be made within a reasonable time after completion of the
work.
19.
DISCRIMINATION. CONTRACTOR represents that it has not, and agrees that it will
not, discriminate in its employment practices on the basis of race, creed, religion,
national origin, color, sex, age, or handicap.
20.
GOVERNING LAW. This Contract and any dispute arising hereunder shall be governed
by the law of the State of California.
21.
WRITTEN NOTICE. Any written notice required to be given in any part of the Contract
Documents shall be performed by depositing the same in the U.S. Mail, postage
prepaid, directed to the address of the CONTRACTOR as set forth in the Contract
Documents, and to the CITY addressed as follows:
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590-3606
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Contract to be executed on the
date first above written.
DATED:
CONTRACTOR
Clovis Paving & Sealing, Inc.
4543 N. Hayes
Fresno, CA 93722
(209) 275-7909
By:
Print or type NAME
Print or type TITLE
DATED:
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Karel, F. Lindemans, Mayor
CONTRACT CA-5 r:\cip\projects\pw95-O6\contract.doc
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
CONTRACT CA-6 r:\cip\projects\pw95oO6\contract.doc
ITEM 23
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE DIRECT
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
.f/J0seph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
February 13, 1996
Completion and Acceptance of the Construction of FY95-96 Citywide
P.C.C. Repairs, Project No. PW95-21
PREPARED BY: ~Bradley A. Buron, Maintenance Superintendent
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council accept the construction of FY95-96 Citywide P.C.C. Repairs, Project No.
PW95-21.
File Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a one (1) year
Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract, and
Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after filing of the Notice of
Completion if no liens have been filed.
BACKGROUND:
The City Council awarded a contract for the construction of FY95-96 Citywide P.C.C. Repairs,
Project No. PW95-21, to West Coast Construction for $38,951.00
This project included concrete sidewalk repairs, removal and replacement of curb and gutter,
removal and replacement of concrete cross gutters, removal and replacement of catch basin
lids, and repair of under sidewalk drains.
The Contractor has completed the work in accordance with the approved plans and
specifications and within the allotted contract time to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
The construction retention for this project will be released on or about thirty-five (35) days
after the Notice of Completion has been recorded.
-1- r:-~agdsp696XO213~m95-21 .mm~dm~
FISCAL IMPACT:
The contract amount for this project was $38,951.00. The original bid cost of the project was
decreased due to a change in the actual field quantities by $3,894.65, bringing the total
contract cost to $35,056.35. This project is a Public Works Annual Maintenance Project and
is being funded from Account No. 100-164-601-5402, Routine Street Maintenance.
ATTACHMENTS:
Notice of Completion
Maintenance Bond
Contractor's Affidavit
ITEM 24
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
February 13, 1996
Proposed Detour for Winchester Road Construction -
Margarita Road to Murrieta Hot Springs Road (Area 1)
PREPARED BY:
Martin C. Lauber, Traffic Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council approve the Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommendation to
request approval from Caltrans the proposed detour plan (Alternative #2), to facilitate the safe
and timely construction of Winchester Road (Area 1 ).
BACKGROUND:
Due to the recent funding arrangements secured for the ultimate construction of Winchester
Road (Area 1 ), staff has initiated an investigation to modify the current 18 month construction
time line, and reduce overall costs to meet current funding.
Riverside County, Administrators of Assessment District 1 61, has taken on the task of
facilitating project development focussing on meeting three primary goals.
Construct Winchester Road to a six (6) lane conventional highway standard between
the existing improvements at Margarita Road and Murrieta Hot Springs Road. This will
close the gap between existing improvements.
To substantially complete the construction prior to the opening of the new Chaparral
High School at Nicolas Road on July, 1997.
To reduce total project costs in order to meet the current funds committed for the
project·
The County has completed its analysis of three alternatives, which are summarized in the
attached Public/Traffic Safety Commission agenda report and shown on Exhibits "A" through
-1- r:Xagdtpt\96\O213\winclose.agn/ajp
This issue has been presented to the Public/Traffic Safety Commission on January 25, 1996
(see attached report). In addition to the proposed improvements recommended by the County,
staff placed two (2) additional requirements on Alternative #2, in order to encourage the
support of the Commission. These requirements included a traffic signal along the proposed
detour route, and the creation of a temporary by-pass road over the property on the southeast
corner of Nicolas Road and Winchester Road. The additional traffic signal will be needed on
Margarita Road at Rustic Glen due to increased traffic volumes. The temporary by-pass road
would be created to avoid detouring local traffic through Roripaugh Hills for a three (3) week
period. This would apply to all alternatives while the intersection of Winchester Road and
Nicolas Road is being re-constructed. At the conclusion of staff's presentation summarizing
the three alternatives, this item was open for public comments.
A representative for the property owner on the corner of Nicolas Road and Winchester Road
stated that his client has not been notified by anyone regarding the possible use of his land
and felt current development plans may interfere with construction of a by-pass road.
The owner of the gas station/food mart located on the corner of Winchester Road and Murrieta
Hot Springs Road also spoke in concern for the recommended Alternative #2. He felt that it
was imperative to his business that some kind of access be provided throughout this project.
He also mentioned that he was happy with the previous project construction management
which accommodated his business.
The Director of Facilities Development with the Temecula Valley Unified School District, was
in favor of any alternative to complete this construction prior to the opening of Chaparral High
School (letter attached). He felt that the combination of parents, students and construction
traffic would create major safety concerns.
Staff has received numerous pleas by the residents of Roripaugh Hills adamantly opposed to
any detour through their development, even for only three weeks of the 13 to 18 month
construction period.
Staff also received a copy of a fax from the City of Murrieta, 'Director of Public Works/City
Engineer, to an official of Caltrans, in opposition of detouring the project traffic onto Murrieta
Hot Springs Road. Their concern was that vehicles detouring would soon find it easier to use
the interchanges at I-15 and 1-215 instead of using Margarita Road to get back into Temecula.
This fax is. attached for your review.
A representative from the County of Riverside stated that they will start immediately to
negotiate with the property owner on the corner of Nicolas Road and Winchester Road. They
felt that because of the short duration of the detour and its timing (September, 1996) that
they could reach an agreement. They also stated that they will continue to work with the
owner of the gas station/food mart to allow access to his business.
The Public/Traffic Safety Commission agreed to support staff's recommendation for
Alternative #2 with the caveat that the effected businesses and property owners be
accommodated, that emergency vehicle response times be reviewed, and school bus routing
be evaluated.
-2- r:Xagdrpt\96\02 13\winglose .agn/ajp
The Commission felt that the four (4) items listed below must be included in the proposed
Alternative #2 for the City's request to Caltrans.
1. Signalization of the Margarita Road/Rustic Glen Drive intersection
Creation of a temporary by-pass road near the intersection of Nicolas Road/Winchester
Road. This would be based on successful negotiations with underlying property owner
and last approximatelythree '(3) weeks.
Analysis of impacts to emergency vehicle response times during the 13 month
construction schedule.
Efforts made to ensure continued access of traffic to the existing businesses along the
detoured section.
Benefits of Alternative #2 as proposed included;
Decreasing construction time by approximately five (5) months (to substantially
complete construction by the opening of the Chaparral High School), reduce costs by
building bridge in one (1) phase, and increase safety by reducing the number of
vehicles traveling through the construction zone.
Staff recommends that the City Council request that Caltrans consider detouring traffic from
State Route 79(N), Winchester Road, to Murrieta Hot Springs Road and Margarita Road to
facilitate the safe and timely construction of Winchester Road - Area 1.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Table "A" Cost Summary
ATTACHMENTS:
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Exhibits "A" through "C" - Project Alternatives
Public/Traffic Safety Commission Agenda Report - January 25, 1996
Letter of support from Temecula Valley Unified School District
Fax from City of Murrieta to Caltrans
County of Riverside Correspondence - January 17, 1996
Engineers Estimate comparing Alternative 81, and Alternative #2
· -3d r:~agdrpt\96\O213\winciose.agn/njp
.:""'~'%,.~..'\,,~'BY CALTRANS '~
RUSTIC GLEN DRIVE
, \,
'\
,/
·//
.,.,~.~ ')<' /
... ~ ,. '~
-xs ~ / /
/
\\
HiRh
School
I.///,V
SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK
.%
l
---____,:'i~>~M~[TH CONSTRUCTION ZONE
y ,/
;IGNALS',,, ~
,,, ORTH
',\
Open to' ~~
Local Traffic
,'\
SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK
.%
Hi:~h
School
TEMPORARY BYPASS ROAD
3 weeks)
Open to Local Traffic
· :" , , "':T,"\, ,(' ' :~,/-'>-" ",, ",,/ , '\ ",,
RUSTIC GLEN DRIVE ~
~,, ,/,,/
/,A~\
/ II
NORTH
Hiffh
School
m, ,ss
TE]VIPORARY :' ~ =':
BOX CULVERTS
;ANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK
II ' -I
"" ALTERNATIVE
,,';~':" --'/"~-, 13 MONTH CONSTRUCTION ZONE
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
Public/Traffic Safety Commission
FROM:
Marty Lauber, Traffic Engineer
DATE:
January 25, 1996
SUBJECT:
Item 2
Proposed Detour for Winchester Road Construction -
Margarita Road to Murrieta Hot Springs Road (Area 1)
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommend to the City Council a detour plan alternative that
well best facilitate the construction of Winchester Road (Area 1).
BACKGROUND:
Winchester Road construction plans were approved by Caltrans with Santa Gertrudis Bridge phased
construction to allow continuous traffic along Winchester Road. Because of limited funding, safety
concerns and project timing, a local engineering firm has investigated methods to reduce impacts of
construction which include (a) construction of the bridge as one unit, and diverting traffic to Margarita
Road and to Murrieta Hot Springs Road, and (b) an alternative detour route across the Santa Gertrudis
Channel using temporary culverts. Consideration has been given to scheduling the construction of
Winchester Road for timely access to the new Chaparral High School. All alternatives will require that
the intersection of Nicolas Road be closed to local traffic for a three week period, which will necessitate
routing local traffic through Roripaugh Hills, while the intersection of Nicolas Road is being
reconstructed.
ALTERNATIVE 1 is the approved plan to phase the construction of the Santa Gertrudis Creek Bridge,
and to phase roadway construction, keeping Winchester Road open to through traffic. The advantage of
this alternative is that the improvement plans are already approved by Caltrans. The disadvantages of
this alternative are: the added cost of construction due to phasing of the bridge and roadway; the
increased hazard of back and forth construction traffic detouring along the roadway; the increased traffic
hazard due ~o the deactivation of the traffic signal at Nicolas Road, with continued through traffic on
Winchester Road; and the additional time of construction due to phased construction. Estimated time of
construction using Alternative 1 is eighteen (18) months. Estimated cost of the bridge for Alternative 1
is $1,445,350, and for the detour is $261,935.
ALTERNATIVE 2 would detour through traffic to Margarita Road and Murrieta Hot Springs Road,
which would mean no phased construction of the bridge, and minimal phasing of the roadway.
Winchester Road would be open for local traffic to Nicolas Road for all but the three (3) week period,
when the intersection was reconstructed. It is reasonable to expect that through traffic will avoid
Margarita Road after one or two experiences, and will quickly learn to use Murrieta Hot Springs Road
to directly access the freeway. The advantages of Alternative 2 are: cost savings of unphased
construction of the bridge and roadway; reduced traffic hazards due to phased construction and of the
deactivated Nicolas Road traffic signal; reduced traffic through the construction area due to the Margarita
Road detour, and direct use of Murrieta Hot Springs access to the freeway; and reduced construction
time. The disadvantages of this alternative are: through traffic will be required to adjust to the detour
r. \traffic~,ommmn~age~da%~\ 125/ajp
route; and the increased traffic along Murrieta Hot Springs Road. Estimated construction time for
Alternative 2 is 13 months. The cost of the bridge is estimated at $1,084,013, and the cost of the detour
is $186,815. The signalization of the Margarita Road/Murrieta Hot Springs Road intersection will be
constructed with County Traffic Signal Mitigation Funds.
ALTERNATIVE 3 would detour through traffic around the bridge over a temporary culvert crossing of
the Santa Genrudis Creek, which would mean no phased construction of the bridge. The advantages of
this alternative would be reduction of the bridge construction time. Disadvantages are: (a) cost of the
detour itself would eliminate any savings of nonphased bridge construction; (b) the culvert crossing could
not convey large storm flows (which might cause rex, onstruction of the temporary crossing); and (c)
increased traffic hazard due to phased construction, the temporary culvert crossing, and deactivation of
the Nicolas Road signal with full through traffic on Winchester Road. Estimated time of construction
would be reduced to thirteen months due to nonphased bridge construction. Cost of the bridge for
Alternative 3 is $1,084,013, and cost of the detour is $523,935.
The City of Temecula, Department of Public Works has reviewed all alternatives and feels that
Alternative 2 will have more benefits than disadvantages if local traffic concerns are mitigated. Table
"A' summarizes the varying duration, costs, and safety associated with each alternative. Due to the
increase in traffic on Margarita Road, the intersection of Rustic Glen Drive is foretasted to deteriorate
below acceptable levels of service. This location currently meets traffic signal warrants even though it
is at the bottom of the Cities Traffic Signal Priority List. Signalization of this intersection would ensure
safe and efficient operation soon after implementation of the proposed detour.
Even though the complete closure of the intersection of Nicolas Road and Winchester Road is a necessity,
the use of Roripaugh Road as a detour path raises residential safety concerns.
The ADT on Nicolas Road just east of Winchester Road is 6,951 vehicles, per counts taken in 1995
(Please note that Roripaugh Ranch has since been developed and occupied, therefore the volumes have
probably increased since 1995). Also, the existing ADTs on Roripaugh Road are 793 and 2,215 vehicles
just south of Nicolas Road and just east of Winchester Road, respectively. Therefore, Roripaugh Road
will experience an ADT in excess of 9,959 vehicles (6,951 + 793 + 2,215) for three weeks due to the
proposed closure. Roripaugh Road is a two lane paved residential collector and 20 residential lots
directly access it. It is highly recommended that the Commission consider a requirement to pave a
temporary bypass road on the vacant parcel on the southeast corner of Nicolas Road and Winchester
Road.
Staff recommends support for Alternative 2, the Margarita Road/Murrieta Hot Springs detour, with the
following conditions:
That along with the signalization on Murrieta Hot Springs Road at Marrgarita Road that
the County signalize the intersection of Margarita Road at Rustic Glen Drive.
That the temporary bypass road be created on the southeast corner of Nicolas Road and
Winchester Road to eliminate the three week detour through Roripaugh Hills.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Table "A" - Cost Summary
Attachment:
Exhibit "A" - Traffic Volumes in Temecula
r: \trnf~c\commissnXag endn\96\ 125/ajp
TABLE "A"
Typical hazards
associated with high
speed traffic through
construction zones
PROJECT SAFETY
Increased safety with
signalization of
Margarita Road at
Murrieta Hot
Springs and Rustic
Glen Drive
intersections
Typical hazards
associated with high
speed traffic through
construction zones
CONSTRUCTION
DURATION
Approximately 18
months
Approximately 13
months with
substantial
completion prior to
high school opening
Approximately 13
months with
substantial
completion prior to
high school opening
PROJECT COSTS $ 4,745,790 $ 4,745,790 $ 4,745,790
Bridge Costs 1,445,350 1,084,013 1,084,013
Traffic. Handling 261.935 186.815 523.935
Total
Savings
$ 6,453,075 $ 6,016,618 $ 6,353,738
(436,457*) (99,337)
Savings does not account for $125,000 needed for additional signal on Margarita Road
and Rustic Glen and construction of recommended bypass road.
NOTE: A complete closure of the intersection of Winchester and Nicolas roads, is proposed
with all alternatives for three weeks with detouring to Roripaugh Road.
R:\TRAFFIC'XCOMMI?~SNXAGENDA\96\0125\TABLE.A-rh
Average Daily
Traffic
Rustic Glen Dr.
CROSS CRE:E.J(
GOLD(H ROD CT
uOONUC.'a CT
P,t~t,U, VLY
6,951
793
SS ROAD
Nicolas Road
I WARBL.~R
TUQLOuNE~
ATIJOR~
2,215
TRAI;I;IC
VOLUNIES
WrlItlN
TEMECULA
EXHIBIT "A"
January 7.5, 1996
TEMECULA VALLEY
Unified School District
SUPERINTENDENT
Pathc~a B. Novotney. Ed.D.
BOARD OF EDUCATION
BarOara Tooker
Richard Shafer
Linda CareDDell
Patti Smah
Rosae Vanderhaak
Public/Traffic Safety Commission
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
Subject:
Pre-July 1997 Winchester Road Completion Schedule
Endorsement Request
Dear Commissioners:
At tonight's Traffic Safety Commission Meeting, you will be considering various scenarios for the upcoming
construction of the six lane Winchester Road improvements from Margarita Road to beyond the Santa Gertrudis
bridge, including a City staff recommendation that enables construction completion prior to the July 1997
opening of the new Chaparrai High School.
The Temecula Valley Unified School District CI'VUSD) urges the Commission to endorse the recommendation
that enables construction completion prior to the July 1997 school opening. Considering the complex na:-'re ,:t'
high school-related and concurrent non-high school-related traffic flows near an active high school campus, the
completion of construction prior to the initial opening of the high school is by far the safest alternative for the
commumty.
Fer the past three years, TVUSD has urged completion of road construction in front of Chaparral High School
prior to the July 1997 operarig, to maximize the safety of high school-related and concurrent non-high school-
relat~,l *-raffic near the school property. TVUSD's efforts to ensure such timely completion have included up
front payment of school property assessments for the road construction funding, plus a commitment to grant all
necessary school property rights-of-way free of charge in remm for a pre-July 1997 completion schedule
commitment.
We urge each Commission member to endorse the City staff recommendation which enables construction
completion prior to the July 1997 school opening, thereby rnaximizing traffic safety for the community.
Sincerely,
T~~~~LLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
Dave Gallaher
Director of Facilities Development
DG:ch
CC:
Patricia B. Novotney, Ed.D., Superintendent
John Brooks, Assistant Superintendent
Board of Education
31350 Rancho Vista Road /Temecula, CA 92592 / (909) 676-2661
_January 19, 199~ 7:lSam -- Page 2.
JAN 1'9 '_c6 i98:3'7~tI CITY ~ ~I~A
?.Z
CITY O[ MITRRIErA
TO:
FROM:
DATZ:
S~:
Ben N. ]VEnandde, Director of Public Worb/City Engineer
January 18, 1996
ROUT2 79 (WINC~F-_~TER ROAD); MITRRIETA HOT SPRINGS ROAD TO
MARGiA ROAD; PROPOSED TOTAL (IDSURE FOR CONSTRUCTION;
TRAFFIC I1v~PACT ON 1-215 AT )f0XRIErA HOT SPRINGS ROAD
INYERCtANGE IN MURRI~TA
We believe the total closure for a one (1) year peziod of the subject selpr, ent of l~u~ 79 for
construction pur~__~__ (currant ADT 5,000) and the mzouang of mi,~ traffic along Y_acdm Hot
Springs Ro~i to Margazita Road, snd then along Kirgari~ Road m Route 79 will resuk in
adverse ~_~ traffic congestion at th: 1-115 at Mm Hot .S1xSo~s Road in~chang~.
Motorists umg this d~ur will soon recogn~ thai by coafinuing w wav~l ~,st~fly along
Mm H~t S~ngs ~ and not taming ~outhe~ly on ~ ~ can mote ea~!y ~zin
acc,~ss to the 1-215 and 1-15 fr~ways by using th~ Murrk~a Hot spmgs Road intm'change than
by u~dng the ~ R~ati d~our.
As you know, the 1-215 at M~ H~ Spmgs Road inmmha~ge w'ich the current 'all. way"
st~p si~ ramp controh is at LOS 'F' dttring Ink periods. While the ,~igrtsti~tion project of
the existing geometries now under eon.ltmc~on will help, tra~e congolion at ~ rulerchange
will be a problem unti/~he ultimam geometric improvements are made.
We can see no benefit t~ Murriela from this proposed chnaur. Rstlzr a defmim traffic detriment
will be the result. This demur scheme is not justiriS, from our point of view, to minimize the
congestion conditions at our intgrchan~e at 1-215.
Please call me if you need additional c/arificarion of our objections.
cc: Joe Kicak
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
TRANSPORTATION AND
LAND MANA CEMENT AGENCY
Transportation Department
David E. Barnhart
Director of Transportation
January 17, 1996
City of Temecula
Department of Public Works
432 174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
Attn: Mr. Joe Kicak, City
Engineer
Subject: Detour For Winchester Road (Area I) Construction
DearJoe:
Per your request, and in reference to the letter of December 6, 1995 (attached), the attached
preliminary construction schedules for the above referenced project are provided for your use in
your presentation at the upcoming City of Temecula Traffic & Safety Commission meeting on
January 25, 1996.
These schedules show the duration of construction based on the following two (2) scenarios:
Scenario 1) A proposed traffic detour on Margarita Road, as discussed at a meeting held
on September 11, 1995 artended by Jeff Stone, Ron Bradley & yourself of the City and
Bob Buster, Kay Ceniceros, Crregg Marrama and 'Kelley Donevan of the County. This
schedule shows that the consreaction of Winchester Road (Area I) could be substantially
completed in conjunction with the opening of Chaparral High School during the summer of
1997.
Scenario 2) Staged construction which allows thru traffic to remain on the highway
throughout the duration of construction. This schedule shows a construction duration of
approximately 18 months, with a date of completion during the late fall/early winter of
1997.
Safety to the travelling public, duration of construction and project cost are the three (3) basic
considerations for utilizing the Scenario 1 detour, which will eliminate thru traffic within the
Winchester Road (Area I) consreaction area.
Caltrans and the County have recently completed highway widening improvements along
Winchester Road between Winchester Creek Road and Hunter/Borel Road. This highway
improvement was done while moving thin traffic along the construction area. During the
construction period six (6) known traffic accidents and one (1) fatality occurred within the
construction area. These accidents occurred in spite of the best efforts of the contractor, Caltrans
and the County to provide well marked and clear traffic controls for traffic during the construction
period.
4080 Lemon Street, 8th Floor · Riverside, California 92501 · (909) 275-6740
P.O. Box 1090 · Riverside, California 92502-1090 · FAX (909) 275-6721
As you know, the new Chaparral High School is scheduled to open on July 1, 1997. For safety
reasons, every effort should be made by all concerned to insure that the highway improvements are
substantially complete on or before this date.
The Scenario 1 preliminary construction schedule, which utilizes the Margarita Road detour, sets
milestones which will allow the project to be substantially completed by July 1, 1997. This
timeframe can be met only if thru traffic is eliminated within the construction area, allowing for the
bridge to be constructed continuously and sequentially, instead of in phases.
Clearly, if the requirement to switch thru traffic from one side of the highway to the other during
bridge consauction is no longer necessary, an obvious source of potential traffic accidents could be
avoided.
Additionally, since only local traffic will pass through the consauction site to Nicolas Road under
Scenario 1, the travelling public will consist almost exclusively of repetitive and knowledgeable
users which should enhance traffic safety.
As you know, the costs associated with the STP Federal Grant application, submitted by the City
to the Riverside County Traffic Commission (RCTC), were predicated on utilizing the proposed
detour on Margarita Road, as described in Scenario 1 above. This issue was discussed in the
September 11, 1995 meeting. The STP Federal Grant required the project to be cleared
environmentally in accordance with National Environmental Protection Act (NEPA) standards,
which would have required at least one (1) year of processing time.
Working toward our common goal of substantially completing the highway improvements prior to
the opening of the new Chaparral High School, the County successfully negotiated with RCTC to
exchange the STP Federal dollars with available local money. This avoided significant project
delays associated with the NEPA environmental process.
Attached is the Summary of the Engineer's Cost Estimate dated December 1, 1995. As you can
see, utilizing the Margarita Road Detour in Scenario 1 will produce an estimated savings of
$436,000 over Scenario 2. Most of this cost saving is attributable to eliminating the need to
construct the bridge in two (2) separate phases. The remainder is attributable to the need for less
temporary consauction traffic control implementation. A consauction funding deficit will be
realized ff the decision is made not to proceed with the Scenario 1 detour.
We will be happy to assist you with your upcoming presentation to the City of Temecula Traffic &
Safety Commission regarding this issue. The success of this project requires all parties to continue
to work together in a spirit of cooperation and goodwill.
Please contact me at (909) 275-6740 if you have any questions, or require additional information.
Director of Transportation
DEB:dkd
2
XC:
file:
Bob Buster, 1st District Supervisor
John Tavaglione, 2nd District Supervisor
Kay Ceniceros, 3rd Diswict Supervisor
Roy Wilson, 4th District Supervisor
Tom Mullen, 5th Disn'ict Supervisor
Larry Parfish, A.O.
Richard Lashbrook, TLMA
Gregg Marrama, A.O.
George Johnson, RCTD ..
Kelley Donovan, RCTD
Greg Aguilar, TPC
Patricia Novomey, TVUSD
Dave Gallaher, TVUSD
Roger Prend, Webb
Ursula Hyman, Latham & Watkins
Frank Lehr, Caltrans
file
Winchester I Detour/Temecula
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
TRANSPORTATION AND
LAND MANAGEMENT AGENCY ~
~"~ Transportation Department v~ ~. B~.
Director of Transportation
December 6, 1995
City of Temecula
Department of Public Works
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
Attention: Joe Kicak, City Engineer
Subject:
Dear Joe:
Detour Alternatives for Winchester Road Area I Construction
Enclosed, for your review and' consideration, .are Alternatives Analysis with exhibits of the
following three alternative detours during construction of Winchester Road (between
Margarita Road and Murrieta Hot Springs Road):
Alternative 1
detour along the Winchester Road Area I construction using
phased bridge and roadway construction
Alternative 2 -
detour closing the Winchester Road Area I construction to all
but local traffic and diverting through traffic to Margarita Road
and Murrieta Hot Springs Road
Alternative 3
detour along the Winchester Road Area I construction which
will detour traffic over a temporary culvert crossing of the Santa
Gertrudis Creek, and phase roadway construction only
Kelley Donovan
Senior Civil Engineer
Steve Crew, swell, COT
Many Lauber, COT
Greg Aguilar, TPC
Dave Hupp, TPC
Joe Perez, TPC
File: 235-91-31 & 135-30
Chron
4080 Lemon Street, 8th FlooreRiverside, California 92501*(909) 275-6740
P. O. Box 1090,Riverside, California 92502-1090,FAX (909) 275-6721
ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS
December 6, 1995
TOPIC:
Detour for Winchester Road Construction between Margarita Road and
Murrieta Hot Spring Road
BACKGROUND:
Winchester Road construction plans were approved with Santa Gertrudis Bridge
phased construction to allow continuous traffic along Winchester Road. Because of
limited funding, TPC has investigated methods to reduce the cost of construction
which include (a) construction of the bridge as one unit, and diverting traffic to
Margarita Road and to Murrieta Hot Springs Road, and (b) an alternative detour
route across the Santa Gertrudis Channel using temporary culverts. Consideration has
-been given to scheduling the construction of Winchester Road for timely access to the
new Chaparral High School. All alternatives will require that the intersection of
Nicolas Road be closed to local traffic for a three week period, which will necessitate
routing local traffic through Roripaugh Hill~, while the intersection of Nicolas Road
is being reconstructed.
DISCUSSION:
Alternative 1 (Exhibit 1) is the approved plan to phase the construction of the Santa
Gertrudis Creek Bridge, and to phase roadway construction, keeping Winchester
Road open to through traffic. The advantage of this alternative is that the
improvement plans are already approved by Caltrans. The disadvantages of this
alternative are: the added cost of construction due to phasing of the bridge and
roadway; the increased hazard of back and forth construction traffic detouring along
the roadway; the increased traffic hazard due to the aleactivation of the traffic signal
at Nicolas Road, with continued through traffic on Winchester Road; and the
additional time of construction due to phased construction. Estimated time of
construction using Alternative 1 is 14 months. Estimated cost of the bridge for
Alternative 1 is $1,445,000, and for the detour is $187,000.
Alternative 2 (Exhibit 2) would detour through traffic to Margarita Road and
Murrieta Hot Springs Road, which would mean no phased construction of the bridge,
and minimal phasing of the roadway. Winchester Road would be open for local
traffic to Nicolas Road for all but the three week period, when the intersection was
reconstructed. It is reasonable to expect that through traffic will avoid Margarita
Road after one or two experiences, and will quickly learn to use Murrieta Hot
Springs Road to directly access the freeway. The advantages of Alternative 2 are:
cost savings of unphased construction of the bridge and roadway; reduced traffic
hazards due to phased construction and of the deactivated Nicolas Road traffic signal;
reduced traffic through the construction area due to the Margarita Road detour, and
direct use. of Murrieta Hot Springs access to the freeway; and reduced construction
time. The disadvantages of this alternative are: through traffic will be required to
adjust to the detour route; and the increased traffic along Murrieta Hot Springs
Road. Estimated construction time for Alternative 2 is 13 months. The cost of the
bridge is estimated at $1,250,000, and the cost of the detour is negligible..The
signalization of the Margarita RoadAVlurrieta Hot Springs Road intersection will be
constructed with Traffic Signal Mitigation Funds.
Alternative 3 (Exhibit 3) would detour thrqugh traffic around the bridge over a
temporary culvert crossing of the Santa Gertrudis Creek, which would mean no
phased construction of the bridge. The advantages of this alternative would be
reduction of the bridge construction time. Disadvantages are: (a) cost of the detour
itself would eliminate any savings of nonphased bridge construction; (b) the culvert
crossing could not convey large storm flows (which might came reconstruction of the
temporary crossing); and (c) increased traffic hazard due to phased construction, the
temporary culvert crossing, and deactivation of the Nicolas Road signal with full
-through traffic on Winchester Road. Estimated time of construction would be
reduced to thirteen months due to nonphased bridge construction. Cost of the bridge
for Alternative 3 is $1,250,000, and cost of the detour is $262,000.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that detour Alternative 2 (which would dose Winchester Road to
through traffic) be used for the construction of Winchester Road due to cost, time
and safety advantages.
Ijm\wpadXcitytem.cor
L
M
N
STATE HIGHWAY 79 NORTH - WIN~TER ROAD
(FROM MARGARITA RD. TO 550-LF NORTH OF WINCHF3'rER CIH~-~K RD.)
INCLUDING RORIPAUGH, NICOLAS RI)L INTERSECTIONS .
PROJECT CONSTRUCTION
B. GRADING
C. STREET IlvfPROVEMENTS
D. STORM DRAIN ITEMS
E. TEMP. CONST. TRAFFIC CONTROL
* TEMP. RAMPPAVEML~.rF
F. WATER l~l=:r .OCATION
G. SEWER Rgrt-OCATIONS
H. BACKBONE AND UTILITY TRENCH
I. SIGNAL INTERCONNECT
J. EROSION CONTROL
INCLUDING BORROW SITE
FINAL STRIPING AND SIGNING
BKIDGE CONSTRUCTION
"I ,F_~,S 9_5% OF BRIDGE COST (ALT. DETOUR)
CHANNEL CONSTRUCTION
SIGNALIZATION
TOTAL
SAVINGS
NOTE:
AND SANTA GERTRUDIS BRIDGE
STAGE 4 - AREA1
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE
DECEM2BER 1, 1995
SUMMARY
ORIGINAL
PHASING
TOTAL
$250,000.00
'$872,79150
$2302,819.20
$378,979.96
$186,81450
$75,11950
$281,408.00
$15,800.00
' $25,125.00
$149,775.00
$57,815.00
ALTERNATIVE
.DETOUR
TOTAL
$250,000.00
$872,79150
$2,3o2,8D.2o
$378,979.96
$186,81450
$0.00
$281,408.00
$15,800.00
$25,125.00
$149,775.00
$57,815.00
$43,056~10
$1,445~350.00
$0.00
$168,220.80
$200,000.00
$6,453,074.56
~3,056.10
$1,445,350.00
($361,337.00)
$168,220.80
$200,000.00
$6,016,618.06
$436,456.50
RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION FROM RORIPAUGH HILLS MAY INCLUDE
LANDSCAPING REPLACEMENT COST.
SMD COST
SMD COST
Pag 1 of 11 ljm~r79stg4.wk106-Dec-95
STATE HIGPIWAY 79 NORTH - WINCHESTER ROAD
(FROM MARGARITA RD. TO 550-LF NORTH OF WINCHF~TER CREEK RD.)
INCLUDING RORIPAUGI{, NICOLAS RD. INFERSECTIONS
AND SANTA GERTRUDIS BRIDGE
STAGE 4 - AREA1
ENGINEER'S F,,TIIMATE
DECEMBER 1, 1995
A~ PROJECT CONSTRUCTION
ITEM NO.
DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY UNITCOST/UNIT TOTAL COST
FIELD OFFICE FOR AGENCY PERSONNEL
CRITICAL PATH PROGRESS SQ4KDULING
MOBILIZATION
N'PDES
1 LS $35,000.00 $35,000.00
1 LS $35,000.00 $35,000.00
1 LS $150,000.00 $150,000.00
1 LS $30,000.00 $30,000.00
$250,000.00
B- GRADING
ITEM NO.
DESCRIFHON
QUAN'ITYY UNITCOST/UNIT TOTAL COST
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
CLEARING AND GRUBBING
WATERING (INCL. DEV. WATER SUPPLY)
ROADWAY EXCAVATION
EXCAVATION SLOPES
IMPORT
OVEREX AND RECOMPACT
FINISHING ROADWAY
PROTECT EXIST. SIGN STRUCTURE
RESTORE LANDSCAPING AND
ELECYRICAL APPURTENANCE
EX2IST. POWER POLES, PROTECT IN PLACE
10 AC $800.00 $8,000.00
1 LS $20,000.00 $20,000.00
55,400 CY $1/5 $69250.00
49~234 CY $1/5 $61~54250
112,790 CY $4.00 $451,160.00
6,868 CY $4.00 $27,472.00
195367 CY Sl.00 $195,367.00
1 LS $30,000.00 $30,000.00
1 LS $5,000.00 $5,000.00
1 LS $5,000.00 $5,000.00
TOTAL $872,79150
C. STREET IMPROVEMENTS
ITEM NO. DESCKIFFION
QUANTITY UNITCOST/UNIT TOTAL COST
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
AC PAVEMENT (INCL. MFDIAN
AND TEMP. DETOUR RAMPS)
ASPHALT RUBBER HOT MIX (15H
AGGKEGATE BASE CLASS II
(INCL. TEMP. DETOUR RAMPS)
SELECT SUBGRADE (12'T)
ASPHALTIC EMULSION
CtNCL. TEMP. DETOUR RAMPS)
CURB & GLrITER TYPE A2-8
PER CALTRANS STD. A-88
CURB & G~R TYPE A2- 6
PER CALTRANS STD. A-87
CURB TYPE A1-8
PER CALTRANS STD. A-87
25,821 TON $2550 $658,43550
7,500 TON $45.00 $337,500.00
38;.37 CY $15.00 $573,555.00
32;270 CY $10.00 $322,700.00
73 TON $320.00 $23,360.00
11,630 LF $6.00 $69,780.00
833 LF $550 $4,58150
221 LF $7.00 $1,547.00
t
Page 2 of 11 ljmNsr79stg4.wk106 - Dec-
1TEM NO.
STATE HIGI-FWAY 7~ NORTH - WINCHESTER ROAD
(FROM MARGARITA RD. TO 550-LF NORTH OF WINCHES'I"ER CREEK RD.)
INCLUDING RORIPAUGH, NICOLAS RD. INTERSECHONS
AND SANTA GERTRUDIS BRIDGE
STAGE 4 - AREA1
ENGINI~-F-R'S ESTIM TE
DECEMBER 1, 1995
STREET IMPR OVE1V[ENTS (CONT0
DESCRIYIION QUANTITY
CURB TYPE ~-6 0vr~L~D
PER CALTRANS STD. A-87 '-'. 13,961
24 CURB &GUTTER TRANSITION (8" TO 6" CF) 207
25 CURB TRANSITION (8'TO6'CF) 220
26 6" TEMP A.C. BERM 1,155
27 6" THZK. PCC SIDEWALK 853
28 WHl~.l~l. CHAIR RAMP CASE-A
PER CALTRANS STD. A-88
INCLUDING CURB RETURN SWK
WItEEL CHAIRRAMPCASE -E
PER CALTRANS STD. A-88
INCLUDING CURB REIlTRN SWK
15'W - D RIVEWAY
PER CALTRANS STD. A-87
30'W-DRIVEWAY
PER CALTRANS STD. A-87
CROSS GUTTER & SPANDREL
CacrD S'rD. 209 & 209A)
CURB & GTo~'I"ER DEPRESSION
PER C~LTRANS 0>78)
KEMOVE & GRIND EXIST. AC
(KECYCLE AS SELECT SUBBASE)
KEMOVE EXIST. BERM & C&G
KEMOVE .EXISTING MISC. PIPES INCL.
S.D. & ABANDONED IRRIG. PIPES
KEMOVE AND REPLACE EXIST.
STt~F-17I' CL MONUMENT
REMOVE EXIST. GUARD RAIL/BARRICADE
REMOVE EXIST. STREET LIGHT
REMOVE EXISTING SIGN
REMOVE EXIST.-CATCH BASIN/INLET
CONCRETE DITCH 2'(W) X r0>)
CONC~='rE DrrCH 3'(w) x 1'0>)
CONCKETE DITCH 4'Cw) x 1.5'0>)
TYPE 1A RETAINING WAT .l .
PER CALTRANS STD. B3-3
CUT OFF WAI .T . @ RIPRAP/BROW DITCH
TRANS. 0>ET. D- 17)
BROW DITCH CONFLUENCE STRUCTURE
(SEE DET. D- 17)
29
3O
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
10
LF $4.50
LF $8.00
LF $7.00
LF $3.00
SF $3.50
TOTAL COST
$62,824.50
$1,656.00
$1,540.00
$3,465.00
$2,985.50
EA $4OO.O0 $4,OOO.00
3 EA $500.00
3 EA $500.00
4,7..20 SF $4.00
467 LF $15.00
341,381 SF $0.20
170 LF $2.00
2,070 LF $7.00
5 EA $300.00
340 LF $8.50
2 EA $1,000.00
37 EA $30.00
4 EA $400.00
610 LF $7.50
1,824 LF $8.00
1,135 LF $9.00
3,034 SF $24.00
1 EA $300.00
1 EA $400.00
$1,600.00
$1,500.00
$16,880.00
$7,005.00
$68,276.20
$340.00
$14,490.00
$1,500.00
$2,890.00
$2,000.00
$1,110.00
$1,600.00
$4,575.00
$14,592.00
$10,215.00
$72,816.00
$300.00
$400.00
Page3o[ll
-.
ijm~r79stg4.wk106-Dec-95
STATE ItlGHV/AY 79 NORTH - WINCtF, STER ROAD
(FROM MARGARITA RD. TO 550-LF NORTH OF WINCHF, STER CREEK RD.)
INCLUDING RORIPAUGH, NICOLAS RI). INTERSECTIONS
~ SAaN'TA GERTRUDIS BRIDGE
STAGE 4 -
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE
DECEMBER 1, 1995
C. STREET IMPROVEMENTS (CONT0
ITEM NO. DESCRIYHON
49
CONCRETEBARRIER TYPE 50A
PER CALTRANS STD. B3-3
METAL BEAM GUARD RAIL
SEE CALTRANS STD. A77A THRU A77K
D. STORM DRAIN ITEMS
ITEM NO. DESCRlY~0N
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
24" RCP CLASS IV
30" RCP (1350-D)
36" RCP (1350-D)
42" RCP (1350-D)
48" RCP (1350-D)
LIGHT CLASS RIPRAP MEIHOD 'B'
MIRAFI 700X FILTER FABRIC
6' THICK 3/4" GRAVEL BLANKET
CONCRETE COil
PER RCFC&WCD STD. M-803
REMOVE EXIST. CONC. BULKHEAD
CMP RISER
PER CALTRANS STD. D75 CFYPE GMP)
MANHOLE PER RCFC&WCD STD. MH 251
STRAIGHT HEAD WALL
PER CALTRANS STD. D-89 (12)=36")
STRAIGHTHEADWAIJ.
PER CALTRANS STD. D-89 (D=24")
"L" TYPE I{EADWAIJ.
PER CALTRANS STD. D-89
REMOVE EXIST. HEADWAI .1.
CATCH BASIN PER RCFC&WCD
STD CB- 100 (W = 14')
CB PER RCFC&WCD STD. D - 100
W/UNDERSIDEWALK D RAI/q
CATCH BASIN PER
RCFC&WCD STD. CB-100 (W=21')
TYPE COL INLET
PER CALTRANS STD. D-72 (W= 10')
QUANTITY
60
130
UNITCOST/UNH'
TOTALCOST
LF $80.00 $4,800.00
LF $50.00
TOTAL
QUANTITY LrNITCOST/UN~
1,616 LF $35.00
116 LF $44.00
1,161 LF $55.00
163 LF $60.00
990 LF $67.00
46 CY $41) .00
1,600 SF $0.50
4 CY $30.00
4 EA $400.00
2 EA $50.00
2 EA $2,000.00
4 EA $2,500.00
1 EA $2,200.00
1 EA $2,000.00
1 EA $2,000.00
3 EA $200.00
1 EA $4,500.00
1 EA $5,000.00
1 EA $6,500.00
2 F.A. $5,000.00
$6,500.00
$2,302,81920
TOTAL COST
$56,565.95
$5,082.00
$63,862.70
$9,772.20
$66,352.11
$1,840.00
$800.00
$120.00
$1,600.00
$100.00
$4,000.00
$10,000.00
$2,200.00
$2,000.00
$2,000.00
$600.00
$4,500.00
$5,000.00
$6,500.00
$10,000.00
Page 4 of 11 ljmNsr79stg4.wk106-Ekc-95
STATE HIGHWAY 79 NORTH - W'INC}-rKqTER ROAD
(FROM MARGAEITA RD. TO 550-LF NORTH OF WINCHF. STER CREEK RD.)
INCLUDING RORIPAUGH, NICOLAS KD. INTERSECTIONS
AND SANTA GERTRUDIS BRIDGE
STAGE 4 - AREA1
ENG~R'S ESTIMATE
DECERBER 1, 1995
D. STORM DRAIN ITEMS (CObIT.)
ITEM NO, DESCRIPTION
70 ' TYPE 'OL' INLET
PER CALTRANS STD, D-72 (W=14')
71 TYPE 'OL' INLET
PER CALTRANS STD, D-72
72 MODIFIED TYPE 'OL' INI.I:I W= 14'
(SEE DETAIL SILT. D- 16)
73 MODIFIED FLAT OU'ILET
PER RCRD STD. 303 (SEE DET. D - lo')
74 LOCAL DEPRESSION NO. 2
PER RCFC&WCD STD. CB-201
75 GUITER DEPKESSION
PER CALTRANS STD. D-78 (D=3D
76 RAISE EXIST, M/-I, COVER AND FRAME
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC CONTROL
EM NO. DESCRJFIION
77
78
79
QUANTITY UNITCOST/UNIT TOTAL COST
8O
16 EA $4,500.00 $72,000.00
1 EA $6,500.00 $6,500.00
6 EA $5,500.00 $33,000.00
1 EA $2,000.00 $2.,000.00
56 LF $15.00 $840.00
583 LF $15.00 $8,745.00
1 EA $3,000.00 $3,000.00
TOTAL $378,979.96
81
82
83
84
QUANTITY
UNIT COST/UNIT
TOTAL COST
85
86
87
88
89
90
--- 91
TEMP, WARNING TRAFFIC SIGNS
(60' X 2,4' AVERAGE)
TEMP. WARNING TRAFFIC SIGNS
(48" X 48' AVERAGE)
TEMP. WARNING TRAFFIC SIGNS
(36" X 36' AVERAGE)
TEM2P. WARNING TRAFFIC SIGNS
(24" X 24' AVERAGE)
TYPE rv ARROW (L/R) PAVEMENT MARKINGS
TYPE VI ARROW PAVEMENT MARKINGS
TYPE VII (LTmT) TURN/FHRU MAKKINGS
TEXT PAVEMENT MARKINGS
(STOP AHEAD, ETC.)
4" WHITE LANE DETAIL NO.12
4' YI~J.OW CENTER DETAIL NO. 22
4' yl~ .1 -OW EDGE DETAIL NO. 25
4' WHITE EDGE DETAIL NO. 27B
4' Y~ I .OW MEDIAN DETAIL 29
8" WItITE DROPLANE DETAIL NO. 37B
5
22
31
EA $350.00 $1,750.00
EA $250.00 $5,500.00
EA $150.00 $4,650.00
26 EA $100.00 $2,600.00
20 EA $35.00 $700.00
4 EA $35.00 $140.00
4 EA $35.00 $140.00
16 EA $40.00
500 EA $10.00
120 LF $0.20
14,100 LF $0.45
650 LF $0.25
28,520 LF $0.20
7~.00 LF $0.60
150 LF $035
$64.0.00
$5,000.00
$24.00
$6345.00
$16250
$5,704.00
$4320.00
$5250
Page 5 o[ 11 ljm~r79stg4.wk106-Dcc-95
STATE HIGHWAY 79 NORTH - WINCI-IF~TER ROAD
(FROM MARGARITA RD. TO 550-LF NORTH OF WINCHF_.,TYER CREEK RD.)
INCLUDING RORIPAUGH, NICOLAS RD. INTERSECTIONS
AND SANTA GERTRUDIS BRIDGE
STAGE 4 - AREA1
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE
DECEMBER 1, 1995
E. TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC CONTROL (con"tO
ITEM NO. DESCRIlYHON QUANTITY UNITCOST/UNIT TOTAL COST
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
15
17
19
8" WHITE CHANN. DETAIL NO. 38
12" WHITE LIMIT LINE
BARRICADE TYPE III
TYPE B - YELLOW FLASHER
TEMP. K-RAIL
(RELOCATE AS R~QOqRED)
TEMP. CRASH CUSHION (ARRAY T-~)
SAND FILLED
PORTABLE CHANGEABLE MESSAGE SIGN
(PROJ. DURATION)
REMOVE EXIST. TEMP. STRIPES & MARXINGS
(Le. SANDBLASTING)
TEMPORARY RAMP FOR PHASING (OPTION)
AC PAVEMENT
AGGREGATE BASE CLASS II
ASPHALTIC EMULSION
2,230 LF $035 $78050
320 LF $0.80 $256.00
95 LF $10.00 $950.00
1 EA $100.00 $100.00
5,000 LF $20.00 $100,000.00
2 EA $3,500.00 $7,000.00
2 EA $10,000.00 $20,000.00
1 LS $20,000.00 $20,000.00
TOTAL $186,814.50
1,919 TON $25.50 $48,934.50
1,703 CY $15.00 $25,545.00
2 TON $320.00 $640.00
TOTAL $75,119.50
F. WATER RELOCATION
ITEM NO. DESCRIFIION
QUANTITY UNITCOST/UNIT TOTAL COST
100 24' CML&C WATER (10GA.)
101 20" CM2L&C WATER (12GA.)
102 20' CML&C WATER (gGA.)
103 16" CML&C WATER (12GA.)
104 WATERLINE PIPE SUPPORT
(SEE DET. SHT. 4 OF 5)
lo5 45o ELBOW (2o')
106 45° ELBOW (16")
107 45° ELBOW 12")
108 24" X 9o FABRICATED BEND
109 24" X 10° FABRICATED BEND
110 24" X 8° FABRICATED BEND
II1 12~ X 2° BEND ('PVC) CL 200
112 20" BLrlTERFLY VALVE
113 16" BUTYERFLY VALVE
114 20"X20"X12" TEE
115 16" TEE
24 LF $65.00 $1,560.00
1,428 LF $55.00 $78,540.00
243 LF $60.00 $14,580.00
230 LF $45.00 $10,350.00
17 EA $30.00 $510.00
10 EA $1,000.00 $10,000.00
2 EA $900.00 $1,800.00
2 EA $800.00 $1,600.00
1 EA $1,000.00 $1,000.00
2 EA $1,000.00 $2,000.00
1 EA $1,000.00 $1,000.00
2 EA $300.00 $600.00
3 EA $3,000.00 $9,000.00
3 EA $2,000.00 $6,000.00
1 EA $1,800.00 $1,800.00
1 EA $1,500.00 $1,500.00
Page 6 of 11 ljmNsr79stg4.wk106 - Dec- 95
STATE HIGHWAY 79 NORTH - WINCHESTER ROAD
(FROM MARGARITA RD. TO 550-LF NORTH OF WINCItE,TFER CEF-F-K RD.)
INCLUDING RORIPAUGH, NICOLAS RD. INTERSECTIONS
AND SANTA GERTRUDIS BRIDGE
STAGE 4 - AREAi
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE
DECEMBER 1, 1995
F. WATER RELOCATION (CONT.)
ITEM NO. DESCRIFHON QUAN'HTY UNITCOST/UNIT TOTAL COST
116 4" BLOW - OFF ASSY.
117 2"AV & AR ASSY.
118 20" X 16" ECCENTRIC REDUCER
119 6" FIE HYDRANT ASSY.
120 FX RING TYPE CONNECIOR
121 2-WIRE TEST STATION PER RW-40A
122 4- WIRE TEST STATION PER RW-41
123 CONC. THRUST BLOCK W/SHEAR RING
124 CONC. THRUST BLOCK
125 30" ST~=~- CASING 1/2' THICKPER RW-23
126 CONC. ENCASEMENT NO. 2 PER RW-27
127 12" PVC C-900 CL 200
128 CUT AND JOIN 12' PVC
129 CUT AND JOIN 12" PVC TO 12" ACP
130 CUT AND JOIN 16" ~C ~ .D AT .I. JOINTS)
13 1 CUT AND JOIN 16" CML&C TO 16" ACP
(WELD AT-T -3OINTS @ CIvIL&C)
132 CUT AND JOIN20" CML&C (WELD AI J- JOINTS)
133 CUT AND JOIN 24" CML&C (WELD AI .1. JOINTS)
134 DE - WATERING EXISTING - 12" WATERLINE
135 DE-WATERING EXISTING - 16" WATEltl
136 DE-WATERING EXIS'IING -20" WATERLINE
137 DE-WATERING EXISTING - 24' WATERLINE
138 REMOVE & RELOCATE EXIST. FI-I ASSY.
139 REMOVE & Rb'~l OCATE EXIST. AV & AR ASSY.
140 ADJUST EXIST. VALVE COVER TO GRADE
141 REMOVE, SALVAGE & RETURN TO RCWD
EXIST. 24" CML&C
142 REMOVE, SALVAGE & RETURN TO RCWD
EXIST. 20" CML&C
143 REMOVE, SALVAGE & RETURN TO RCWD
EXIST. 16" CML&C
144 REMOVE, SALVAGE & RETURN TO RCWD
EXIST. 20" X 16" REDUCER
145 REMOVE & RETURN TO RCWD EXIST. FH
146 REMOVE & REKIRN TO RCWD EXIST. BO
147 REMOVE, SALVAGE & RETURN TO RCWD
EXIST. 16' TEE
1 EA $2,000.00 $2,000.00
2 EA · '$1,500.00 $3,000.00
1 EA $3,500.00 $3,5OO.00
1 EA $2.500.00 $2,500.00
1 EA $700.00 $700.00
3 EA $4O0.00 $1,200.00
3 EA $600.00 $1,800.00
2 EA $350.00 $700.00
I3 EA $200.00 $2,600.00
239 LF $150.00 $35,850.00
99 LF $30.00 $2,970.00
10 LF $35.00 $350.00
1 EA $1,300.00 $1,300.00
2 EA $1300.00 $2,600.00
1 EA $1,600.00 $1,600.00
1 EA $1,600.00 $1,600.00
3 EA $1,800.00 $5,400.00
2 EA $9_.000.00 $4,000.00
1 EA $8O0.00 $800.00
1 EA $900.00 $900.00
1 EA $1,000.00 $1,000.00
1 EA $1,100.00 $1,100.00
6 EA $2.,000.00 $12,000.00
3 EA $1,500.00 $4,500.00
13 EA $200.00 $2,600.00
24 LF $35.00 $840.00
440 LF $20.00 $8,800.00
170 LF $15.00 $2,550.00
1 EA $100.00 $100.00
1 EA $200.00 $200.00
1 EA $200.00 $200.00
1 EA $100.00 $100.00
PaR: 7 of 11 ljm~r795tg4.wk106-De, c-95
ITEM NO.
STATE HIGHWAY 79 NORTH - WINCHESTER ROAD
(FROM MARGARITA RD. TO 550-LF NORTH OF WIN~R CREEK RD.)
INCLUDING RORIPAUGH, NICOLAS RD. INTERSECTIONS
AND SANTA GERTRUDIS BRIDGE
STAGE 4- AREA1
ENGIN~-~-R'S ESTIMATE
DECEMBER 1, 1995
WATER til~I-OCATION (CONY.)
DESCRIPTION QUAN'ITFY UNITCOST/UNIT TOTAL COST
148 REMOVE, SALVAGE & RETURN TO RCWD
EXIST. BUTI'ERFLY VALVE
149 REMOVE AND DISPOSE AC PIPE (12' &
150 20' CML~C TO BE ABANDONED AND
SLI/RRY Fn .LED (2-BAG)
151 REMOVE AND DISPOSE 12' PVC
152 PROTECT IN PLACE EXIST. WAT. FACILrrlES
4 EA $400.00 '$1,600.00
180 LF $30.00 $5,400.00
1,220 LF $10.00 $12,200.00
1~ LF $7.00 $1,008.00
1 LS $10,000.00 $10,000.00
TOTAL $281,408.00
G. SEWER R~-OCATIONS
ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION
153 RAISE EXIST. MAN'HOLE COVER & FRAME
154 ADJUST EXIST. MANHOLE COVER TO GKADE
155 PROTECT IN PLACE EXIST. SEW. FACILITIES
QUANTITY
UNITCOST/UNIT
TOTAL COST
9 EA $700.00 $6,300.00
9 EA $500.00 $4,500.00
1 LS $5,000.00 $5,000.00
TOTAL $15,800.00
H. BACKBONEfSUBDMSION UTILITY TRENCH
ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
UNITCOST/UNIT
TOTAL COST
156 BACKBONE UTILITY TRENCH
157 SUBDMSION UTILITYTRENCH
44O
565
LF $25.00 $11,000.00
LF $25.00 $14,125.00
TOTAL $25,125.00
I. SIGNAL INTER CONNECT
ITEM NO. DESCRIFrION
158 1-1/2" PVC COND. SCH. 80 W/i2 PR.
#20 SIGNAL IC CABLE
159 SIGNAL INTERCONNECT PULL BOX NO5
160 2" PVC COND. SCH. 80, W/12 PR.
#20 SIGNAL IC CABLE
161 TYPE ~IVI' CABINET/SPLICE BOX
162
#20 SIGNAL IC CABLE
QUANTITY
4,150
60
5,400
15
75
UNITCOST/UNIT
TOTAL COST
LF $12.00 $49,800.00
EA $120.00 $7,200.00
LF $16.00 $86,400.00
EA $300.00 $4,500.00
LF $25.00 $1,875.00
TOTAL $149,775.00
Page 8 of I1 ljm~sr79stg4.wk106-Dec-95
STATE HIGHWAY 7P NORTH - WIN~R ROAD
CFROM MARGAKITA RD. TO 550-LF NORTH OF WIN~R CREW.
INCLUDING RORIPAUGH, NICOLAS RD. INTERSE~ONS
AND SANTA GERTRUDIS BRIDGE
STAGE 4 - A_REA1
ENGINEER'S F, STIMATE
DECEMBER 1, 1995
J. EROSION CONTROL ('INCLUDING BORROW SITE)
ITEM NO. DESCKEPTION QUANTITY UNITCOST/UNIT
163 HYDROSEEDING
164 1- BAG HIGH SANDBAG
165 2-BAG HIGH SANDBAG
166 3-BAG HIGH SANDBAG
167 STRAW BALE BARRIER
168 DESILTING BASIN EXCAVATION
57 6" TI-IICK 3/4" GRAVEL BLANKET
593,000 SF $0.04
11,500 LF $150
1,865 LF $3.00
600 LF $5.00
2,420 LF $3.00
120 CY $2.00
25 CY $30.00
TOTAL
IC FINAL STRIPING AND SIGNING
ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY UNITCOST/UNIT
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
81
83
86
87
88
90
91
92
99
TRAFFIC SIGNS 6" X 15"
TRAFFIC SIGNS 24" X 36" (AVE.)
TRAFFIC SIGNS 36" X 36" (AVE.)
TRAFFIC SIGNS 48" X 48' (AVE.)
TRAFFIC SIGNS 66" X
REMOVE OR Rg~-OCATE EXIST. TRAFFIC SIGNS
4' Y~ .1 -OW NO PASSING LANE DETAIL NO. 21
TYPE IV ARROW (LT/RT) PAVEMENT MARKINGS
TYPE VII (LT/RT) TLrRNFrHRU
PAVEMENT MARKINGS
TEXr PAVEMENT MARKINGS
(STOP AHEAD, ETC.)
4" WHITE lANE DETAIL NO. 12
4" ~ J .OW CENTER DETAIL NO. 22
4" Y~ J .OW EDGE DETAIL NO. 25
4" yFI _1.0W MEDIAN DETAIL NO. 29
8" WHITE DROPLANE DETAIL NO. 3713
8" WHITE CHANN. DETAIL NO. 38
REMOVE EXIST. TEMP. STRIPES AND
PAVEMENT MARKING (Le. SANDBLASTING)
TOTAL COST
$23,720.00
$17,250.00
$5,595.00
$3,000.00
$7,260.00
$240.00
$750.00
$57,815.00
TOTAL COST
5 EA $75.00 $375.00
12 EA $125.00 $1,500.00
10 EA $150.00 $1,500.00
10 EA $325.00 $3,250.00
1 EA $350.00 ~350.00
12 EA 1,40.00 $480.00
180 LF $02.5 $45.00
43 EA $35.00 $1,505.00
1 EA $35.00 $35.00
50 EA $35.00
32,643 LF $0.20
200 LF $0.45
13980 LF $0.25
1610 LF $0.60
555 LF $035
2835 LF $035
$1,750.00
$6528.60
$90.00
$3,495.00
$966.00
$194.25
$992.25
LS $20,000.00 $20,000.00
TOTAL $43,056.10
Page 9 of 11 ijm~r79stg4.wk106-Dec-95
STATE ltlGHWAY 79 NORTH - WIN~R ROAD
CFROM MARGARITA RD. TO 550-LF NORTH OF WIN~R CREEK RD.)
INCLUDING RORIPAUGIt, NICOLAS RD. INTERSECTIONS
AND SANTA GERTRUDIS BRIDGE
STAGE 4 - AREA1
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE
DECEMBER 1, 1995
L. BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION
ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION
176 MOBrI_.IZATION (BRIDGE)
177 REMOVE EXISTING BRIDGE
178 STRUCTURE EXCAVATION (BR/DGE)
179 STRUCURE EXCAVATION CrYPE D)
180 STRUCTURE BACKFTI .I, (BRIDGE)
181 FURNISH PILING (CLAS,S 45)
182 DRIVE PILES (CLASS 45)
183 FURNISH PILING (CLASS 70)
184 DRIVE PIES (CLASS 70)
185 STRUCTURAL CONCRETE, BRIDGE
186 STRUCTURAL CONCP, EI~ BRIDGE FOOTING
187 STRUCTURAL CONCRErE, APPROACH SLAB
188 BAR REINFORCING STEE~ (BRIDGE)
189 MISCKI J ANEOUS METAL, BRIDGE
~90 JOINT SEAL TYPE B (MR= F)
191 TUBULA~ HAND RAILING
7.92 CONCRETE BARRIER
193 WATERSTOP
LESS .25% OF COST
(NON-PHASED CONSTRUCTION)
QUANTITY
UNIT COSTFtJNIT
1 · LS $120,000.00
1 LS 67,200.00
583 CY $35.00
324 CY $100.00
335 CY $45.00
2,384 LF $15.00
66 EA $1,000.00
1,t02 LF $15.00
42 LF $1,000.00
1,653 CY $350.00
192 CrY' $300.00
284 CY $250.00
478,700 L,B $050
9,890 LB $3.00
254 LF $60.00
397 LF $20.00
397 LF $60.00
254 LF $15.00
TOTAL COST
$120,000.00
$67,200.00
$20,405.00
$32,400.00
$15,075.00
$35,760.00
$66,000.~
$19,530.00
$42,000.00
$578,550.00
$57,600.00
$71,000.00
$239,350.00
$29,670.00
$15,2tm.oo ---
$7,940.0,,
$23,820.00
$3,810.00
$1,445~350.00
1 LS $361,337.00 ($361,337.0(})
TOTAL $1,084,013.00
Page 10 of 11 ljmNsr79stg4.wk106-De, c-95
STATE HIGtt~AY ~ NORTH - ~N~TER ROAD
(FROM MARGAR1TA RD. TO 550 -LF NORTH OF V/INCHF, STER CREEK RD.)
INCLUDING RORIPAUGH, NICOLAS P,D. INTERSECTIONS
AND SANTA GERTRUDIS BRIDGE
STAGE 4 - AREA1
ENGINEER'S ESTtMATE
DECEMBER 1. 1995
M
ITEM NO.
194
CHANNKI- CONSTRUCTION
DESCRIFHON
6" CLASS A CONC .CHANNEL LINING
W/#4 @ 18" EACH WAY
195 6" CLASS A CONCRETE
CUT OFF WAY .I . SEE DET. 'G' 'SHT. 15 OF 19
196 6" CLASS A CONCRETE
10U~224" FOOTING SEE DET. 'F SHT. 15 OF 19
197 3" WK, F~ HOLES PER RCFCaWCD STD. 326
198 JUNCTION STRUCTURE NO. 6 PER
RC"FC&WCD STD. NO JSZB1
199 1/4 TON RIPRAP
200 REMOVE EXIST. RIPRAP
12 OVEREX AND RECOMPACT
52 36" RCP (1350-D)
56 MIRAF1700X FILTER FABRIC
57 6' THICK 3/4" GRAVEL BLANKET
QUANTITY
TOTAL COST
20,100 SF $350 $70,350.00
1,005 SF $550 $5,52750
1,340 SF $15.00 $20,100.00
67 EA $50.00 $3,350.00
1 EA $1,500.00 $1,500.00
17 CY $45.00 $765.00
2,400 CY $25.00 $60,000.00
1,540 CY $1.00 Sl,540.00
83 LF $55.00 $4,56830
500 SF $050 $250.00
9 CrY $30.00 $270.O0
TOTAL $168,220.80
N. SIGNALITATION
ITEM NO.
DESCRIFHON
201
202
SIGNAL AT NICOLAS RD. INTERSECTION
SIGNAL RECONFIGURATION AT
MARGARITA KID, INTERSECTION
QUANTITY UNITCOST/UNIT TOTAL COST
1 LS $135,000.00 $135,000.00
· 1 LS $65,000.00 $65,000.00
TOTAL $200,000.00
GRAND TOTAL $6,453,074.56
Pag~ 11 of 11 ijm~r79stg4.wk106-Dec-95
ITEM 25
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAl'.
c T
I Y ATTORNEY ,., /
FINANCE DIRE' '-"'
CITY MANAG
C|TY O[ TEMECU~A
AGENDA REPORT
City CounciUCitV Manager
Mary 3ene Mckarney, Assistant City Manager
February 13, 1996
Award of 8id for 8eOeecement Computer Workstations
PREPARED BY:
Thomas Hafeli, Information Systems Administrator
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1 ) Award a bid for the purchase of the
replacement computer workstations for city hall, Bid Number 96-01 to Golden State Trading
Company, Brea, CA for $205,608.55. 2) Approve an Operating Transfer from the General
Fund to the Information Services Internal Services Fund in the amount of $200,000.
BACKGROUND: On January 5, 1996 the city solicited public bids for the purchase of 80
Personal Computer Workstations to replace existing computer workstations at city hall. The
current computer workstations have been primarily in service since 1990-91 and have outlived
their useful life span. The current computers are 386sx, 20MHz processors, with 1-2MB
RAM, and no hard drives. This technology is outdated and will not be able to operate the
newer software packages that are needed to efficiently support the operations of each
department.
In addition, the city has recently connected to the County wide area network. This connection
will provide full electronic mail access to not only the county offices, but to outside state and
federal agencies through the Internet electronic mail system. This connection will future
enhance the citys communications capability.
The city has utilized a DOS based application platform since 1990. Staff recommends that
we move to a Windows based platform as that platform is needed to support records
management imaging, and the latest applications of integrated word processing, spreadsheets
and data base applications. This integrated format will allow users to work with multiple
applications simultaneously, thereby dramatically increasing staff productivity.
AGENDA REPORT - Award of Bid for Replacement ComPuter Workstations
Staff is recommending that we purchase the equipment ahead of the new city hall
move because this equipment is needed to support the records management imaging
and because the old hardware is beginning to fail. The equipment is transferrable to
the new city hall.
The bid package consisted of 80 Pentlure workstations. Each workstation consists
of an Intel 133MHz processor, 16MB RAM, a hard drive, SVGA color monitor and
ergonomic keyboard. designed to reduce work related injuries. This workstation will
operate all of the necessary applications that are currently required. This state of the
art workstation will increase individual and departmental productivity.
Thirteen (13) bids were publicly opened on January 25, 1996 and the results are as
follows:
Bidder Bid Amount
1. Golden State Trading Company, Brea $205,608.55
2. New Technologies, Santa Fe Springs $209,162.30
3. Butterfield Electronics (Radio Shack), Temecula $219,350.00
4. Software House International, Huntington Beach $227,461.35
5. Valley Micro Computers, Temecula $227,920.20
6. Jaguar/MicroAge Computers, Riverside $232,411.66
7. Compu Systems, Walnut $233,338.51
8. LPS Computer Service, Escondido $249,138.73
9. Inacom Information Systems, San Diego $253,217.54
10. System Design Computers, San Diego $258,821.00
11. 4 Tech Computer Company, Elsinore $280,439.65
12. MicroAge of Temecula, Temecula $297,810.27
13. CompUSA, San Marcos $412,066.23
Staff reviewed the bid proposal from Golden State Trading Company, and found that
the proposal was complete and in order. Golden State Trading Company has done
business with the City in the past, and has always provided good reliable service.
FISCAL IMPACT: Revenues are available in the Information Systems Internal Services
Fund to assist in the funding of this computer replacement. However, a transfer from
the General Fund is requested to maintain an adequate level of reserves in the Internal
Service Fund for future Information Systems related equipment needs.
ITEM 26
TO.'
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council
Ronald E. Bradley, City Manager
February 13, 1996
Amendment to Lease Agreement
PREPARED BY: ~ Herman D. Parker, Deputy Director of Community Services
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council:
Approve an amendment to the Real Property Lease Agreement between the Temecula Town
Association and the City of Temecula regarding the operation and maintenance of Rotary Park.
BACKGROUND: On October 10, 1995, the Board of Directors approved and
entered a real property lease agreement with the Temecula Town Association (TTA) to enable
the City to maintain and operate Rotary Park as a public park and part of the city's existing
park system. The park site, located at 28816 Pujol Street, directly to the north side of the
TTA's Community Center, is currently under construction and is tentatively scheduled for
completion in May of 1996.
In Exhibit B of the original lease agreement, the TTA requested to retain access to the
Caboose which is located at the southern end of the park site. The TTA also agreed to be
responsible for maintaining the interior and exterior of the Caboose.
As of January 1996, the TTA no longer needs to use or maintain access to the Caboose. As
a result, staff is recommending that the original lease agreement be amended to allow the City
to utilize the Caboose to expand city services in the Old Town Temecula area. It is envisioned
that the Caboose would be used to facilitate the delivery of the Problem Oriented Policing
(POP) program. This program would provide police presence and visibility in the Old Town
Temecula area.
FISCAL IMPACT: The maintenance of the Caboose and annual operating expenses
associated with the Problem Oriented Policing program are approximately $10,000. These
funds will be considered by the City Council during the mid-year budget adjustments.
ATTACHMENT:
Amendment to Lease Agreement
FIRST AIV!'F~~ TO RE&L PROPERTY
LEASE BETWEEN TF. AVlF,~ULA TOWN
ASSOCIATION AND CITY OF TEMECULA
(ROTARY PARK)
TRIg FIRST AMENDMENT TO REAL PROPERTY LEASE is entered
into by and between the City of Temecula, a California general hw municipal corporation.
("Tenant") and the Temecula Town Association, a California non-profit corporation
("Landlord") and shall 'be dated as of February 13, 1996. In consideration of the mutual
promises and covenants contained herein and for other 'good and valuable consideration, the
receipt and sufficiency of which is acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:
1. This First Amendment is made with respect to the following facts,
which each of the parties agree are correct:
a. On October 10, 1995, the Landlord and Tenant entered into the
"Real Property Lease" (the "Lease") by which the Tenant leased certain real
property in the City of Temecula for the development of Rotary Park.
b. The Lease describes in Section 1.0 1 the real property which is
to be leased to the Tenant, excluding certain appurtenances, easements or
Improvements on the property which are specifically described in Exhibit B of
the Lease. Exhibit B provides that the Landlord reserves to itseft the use of
the Caboose which is located at the southern end of the Park.
c. The Landlord no longer needs to use the Caboose and the
parties now intend to amend the Lease so as to allow the City to use the
Caboose for park and recreational purposes and for a police substation.
2. Exhibit B to the Lease is hereby amended by deleting the August 31,
1995 letter from John Sterling, General Manager, Temecula Town Association, to the City of
Temecula and the map showing the Caboose attached thereto and inserting in their place the
word "None."
3. Section 3.01 of the Lease is hereby amended to read as follows:
"Section 3.01 Permitted Use. Tenant shall use the Premises
solely for the purpose of constructing, maintaining, and
operating a public park and associated recreational facilities and
for maintaining a police substation in the Caboose structure on
the Premises. Tenant shall not change the primary use of the
Premises without first obtaining the written consent of the
Landlord."
i:~NELSON~MNDMNT.TFA 7JI/9~
4. Except as specifically set forth in this First Amendment, all other terms
of the Lease shall remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF this First Amendment to Real Property Lease has
been executed by the authorized representatives of the parties as of the date first written
above.
CITY OF TEMECULA
Attest:
Karel Lindemans
Mayor
June S. Greek
City Clerk
Approved as to Form:
Peter M. Thorson
City Attorney
TEMECULA TOWN ASSOCIATION
By:
Buck Kemmis
President
TEMECULA COMMUNITY
SERVICES DISTRICT
ITEM I
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
HELD JANUARY 23, 1996
A regular meeting of the Temecula Community Services District was called to order at 7:38
PM at the Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California.
President Ron Roberts presiding.
PRESENT: 4 DIRECTORS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Stone, Roberrs
ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None
Also present were General Manager Ronald E. Bradley, General Counsel Peter Thorson and
City Clerk June S. Greek.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None given.
CONSENT CALENDAR
It was moved by Director Stone, seconded by Director Lindemans to approve Consent
Calendar Items 1-4. The motion was unanimously carried.
2
3
4
r:\minutee.csd\012396
Minutes
1.1 Approve the minutes of January 9, 1996.
Tree Trimmine Contract - Community Services Department
2.1 Award contract for trimming trees in Saddlewood, Martinique, Woodcrest
Country, and Vintage Hills slope maintenance areas to Golden Bear Arborists,
Inc. in the amount of $19,990.
Release of Landscaoe Bonds - Taylor Woodrow Homes/Vintaae Hills Develooment
(Rancho California Road and Meadows Parkway)
3.1 Authorize the City Clerk to exonerate the remaining landscape bonds for
Tract Nos. 22715-0; 22715-1,22715-2; 22716-1,22915-0 and 22916-1.
Combininc) Balance Sheet as of Seotember 30, 1995 and the Statement of
Revenues. Exoenditures and Chanqes in Fund Balance for the Three Months Ended
Seotember 30.1995
4.1 Receive and file the Combining Balance Sheet as of September 30, 1995 and
the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance for
the Three Months Ended September 30, 1995.
GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT
None given.
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT
None given.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS
None given.
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Director Stone, seconded by Director Lindemans to adjourn at 7:40 PM to
a meeting on February 13, 1996, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho
Vista Road, Temecula, California. The motion was unanimously carried.
ATTEST:
Ron Roberts, President
June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk
r:\minutes.csd\012396 -2-
ITEM 2
APPROV,
CITY ATTORNEY '
FINANCE DIREjT~
CITY MANAGE
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO-'
Board of Directors
FROM:
Ronald E. Bradley, General Manager
DATE:
February 13, 1996
SUBJECT:
Fence Installation Contract - Temecula Duck Pond
PREPARED BY: ~
RECOMMENDATION:
Bruce A. Hartley, Maintenance Superintendent
That the Board of Directors:
Award contract of $22,985 to Rancho Recycled Products for the installation of 1783 linear
feet of white, two-rail trail fencing at the Temecula Duck Pond.
BACKGROUND: The Community Services Department obtained two cost quotes for the
replacement of the existing wood, split-rail fencing at the Temecula Duck Pond. The two
quotes compared concrete fencing, which has been utilized in several neighbood parks, with
recycled plastic fencing that has been installed at two City parks with favorable results.
Rancho Recycled Products of Temecula submitted an installed price of $22,985 for plastic
fencing. Designer Concrete Products of Los Angeles submitted a price of 932,761 for the
installation of concrete fencing. Both companies are considered to be sole-source providers
of their type of product, therefore three competitive bids were not necessary. In addition to
being a more cost effective product, the Community Services Department has found the
aesthetics and durability of the recycled material to be superior to that of the concrete.
Therefore it is recommended that Rancho Recycled Products be awarded this contract as the
best product for the intended application. In addition, the use of recycled products is
appropriate for a City park and a local vendor will able to provide a high level of customer
service,
FISCAL IMPACT: The cost of the fence installation contract is 922,985. Sufficient funds
exist in the current capital improvement budget for the Temecula Duck Pond, account number
210-190-143-5804.
ATTACHMENTS:
1 ) Agreement
122994
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
This Agreement was made and entered into this 10th day of January 19 95, by
and between the City of Temecula ("City"), a municipal corporation, and Rancho Recycled
Products., a Corporation ("'Contractor").
The parties hereto mutually agree as follows:
Services. Contractor shall perform the tasks set forth in Exhibit "A" attached
hereto. Contractor shall complete the tasks according to the schedule set forth in
Exhibit "A".
Performance. Contractor shall at all times, faithfully, industrially and to the best of
his ability, experience and talent, perform all tasks described herein.
Payment. The City agrees to pay Contractor following completion of specified
work. An amount not to exceed $22,985.03 for the total term of the Agreement
unless additional payment is approved by the City Council; provided that the City
Manager may approve additional payment not to exceed ten percent (10%) of the
Agreement; but in no event more than $10,000.00.
Contractor will submit invoices upon completion of specified work for actual
services performed. Invoices shall be submitted on or about the first business day
of each month, for services provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made
within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice.
Amendments· This Agreement may be amended so long as such amendment is in
writing and agreed upon by both the City Council and Contractor.
Ownership of Documents. Upon satisfactory completion of or in the event of
termination, suspension or abandonment of this Agreement, all original documents,
designs, drawings, and notes prepared in the course of providing the services to be
performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City
and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the City without the
iaermission of the Contractor.
Termination. The City may terminate this Agreement without cause so long as
written notice of intent to terminate is given to Contractor at least three (3) days
prior to the termination date. In the event of termination, Contractor shall be paid
for the services performed.
Indemnification. The Contractor agrees to indemnify and save harmless the City,
its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims,
demands, losses, defense cost, or liability of any kind or nature which the City, its
officers, agents and employees may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon
them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of
Contractor's acts or omissions under the terms of this Agreement, excepting only
liability arising out of the sole negligence of the City.
3b~cu~ract~nifnc.~
10.
11.
12.
Status of Contractor. Contractor is an independent contractor in all respects in the
performance of this Agreement and shall not be considered an employee of the City
for any purpose. No employee benefits shall be available to Contractor in
connection with the performance of this Agreement.
Except as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other
compensation to Contractor for performing services hereunder for City. City shall
not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Contractor for injury or sickness
arising out of performing services hereunder.
Term. This Agreement shall commence on February 14,19 96, and shall remain
and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event
later than June 30,19 96.
Subcontracts. The Contractor shall be permitted to enter into a subcontract for
fence removal and installation services as needed to complete the Contractor's
portion of this Agreement. At all times, Rancho Recycled Products shall be
primarily responsible for the performance of the tasks described herein. Contractor
shall provide City with fourteen (14) days' notice prior to the departure of Moore
Fence Co. from Contractor's employ. Upon such notice, the City shall have the
option to immediately terminate this Agreement. Upon termination of this
Agreement, Contractor's sole compensation shall be for the value of service
rendered to the City.
Default. In the event that Contractor is in default for cause under the terms of this
Agreement, the City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating
Contractor for any work performed after the date of default. Default shall include
not performing the tasks described herein to the reasonable satisfaction of the City
Manager of the City. Failure by the Contractor to make progress in the performance
of work hereunder, if such failure arises out of causes beyond his control, and
without fault or negligence of the Contractor, shall not be considered a default.
Any disputes regarding performance, default or other matters in dispute between
the City and the Contractor arising out of this Agreement or breech thereof, shall
be resolved by arbitration. The arbitrator's decision shall be final.
Contractor shall select an arbitrator from a list provided by the City of three retired
judges of the Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services, Inc. The arbitration
hearing shall be conducted according to California Code of Civil Procedure Section
1280, et seq. City and Contractor shall share the cost of the arbitration equally.
Notices. Notices shall be given pursuant to this Agreement by personal service on
the party to be notified, or by written notice upon such party deposited in the
custody of the United States Postal Service addressed as follows:
a. City:
13.
14.
15.
Attention: City Manager
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
Contractor:
Bullet Anderson
Rancho Recycled Products
27840 Del Rio Rd., Suite C
Temecula, CA 92590
The notices shall be deemed to have been given as of the date of personal service,
or three (3) days after the date of deposit of the same in the custody of the United
States Postal Service.
Entire Agreement. This Agreement and any documents or instrument attached
hereto or referred to herein integrate all terms and conditions mentioned herein or
incidental hereto supersede all negotiations and prior writing in respect to the
subject matter hereof.
In the event of conflict between the terms, conditions, or provisions of this
Agreement and any such document or instrument, the terms and conditions of this
Agreement shall prevail.
Liability. Except as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages,
or other compensation to Contractor for performing services hereunder for City.
City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Contractor for injury
or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder.
Contractor agrees to indemnify, release and hold harmless the City, its officers,
agents, employees, and representatives for all claims or losses the City may suffer
resulting from any negligent actions or omissions by Contractor.
Contractor shall secure workers' compensation insurance. Upon request of
Contractor, the City shall add Contractor to the City's workers' compensation policy
and the Contractor to the City's workers' compensation policy and the Contractor
shall reimburse the City for the cost of said insurance premiums.
Licenses. Contractor and Subcontractor shall obtain all necessary licenses,
including but not limited to, City Business Licenses.
The parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date and year above
written.
RANCHO RECYCLED PRODUCTS
CITY OF TEMECULA
By: By
Print Name and Title
Ron Roberts, President
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
EXHIBIT "A"
TASKS TO BE PERFORMED/SCOPE OF WORK
Perform the following:tasks as specified at the Temecula Duck Pond, located at the southwest
corner of Rancho California Road and Ynez Road, in the City of Temecula.
Furnish all labor and materials necessary to remove and dispose of approximately 1800 lineal
feet of existing wood split-rail fence material and install 1,783 lineal feet of new two-rail fence
(made of recycled material), 36" in height, with 2" x 4" x 36" twisted steel wire attached to
the fence (each rail) at intervals not to exceed (4) feet. Install (1) 16' double-wide gate and
(2) 4' gates to match fence material. Gates shall be constructed of galvanized steel tubing,
with all galvanized hardware, and with recycled fence material mounted to the steel gate
structure. The support posts for the gates shall be filled with concrete to insure structural
integrity. The gates shall have heavy duty steel hinges of a type suitable for the weight of the
gates. Exact location of the gates shall be determined by the City Maintenance
Superintendent. The fence posts shall be spaced no greater than eight feet apart, and shall
have a concrete footing of 12"in diameter x 18" minimum depth. A round ternplate shall be
utilized when pouring the concrete around each post to insure a uniform shape. Finish grade
of cement footing shall be 1" above grade. Each post shall be set 1 ' 3" into the ground. The
removal of existing fence material shall coincide with the installation of the new fence so that
the site is not left completely open to the street during construction. At the completion of
each day's work, the site shall be left in a clean, safe condition. At the completion of the
project the site shall be left thoroughly clean. Work to be completed in one continuous
operation, weather permitting, and at no time shall the performance of the work block any
public street, sidewalk, or create a hazard to the public.
3b\c~ntmct~lf~.e.a~t
ITEM 3
CITY ATTORNA~ROV"~/~
DIRECTOR OF FI ~E ~
CITY MANAGERI~_
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
Board of Directors
FROM:
Ronald E. Bradley, General Manager
DATE:
February 13, 1996
SUBJECT:
Release of Labor and Materials Bond for Voorburg Park - Nicolas
Road and North General Kearney Road.
PREPARED BY: ~::~eryl Yasinosky, Development Services Analyst
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors:
Authorize the City Clerk to release the Parkland/Landscape Labor and Materials Bond for the
construction of Voorburg Park - Van Daele Development Corporation.
BACKGROUND: On May 11, 1993, the Board of Directors entered into a
Parkland/Landscape Agreement with:
Van Daele Development Corporation/Rancho 126 Ltd.
2900 Adams Street, Ste. C-25
Riverside, CA 92504
for the construction of a .26 acre park within Tract No. 22627-0. Upon receiving clear title
to the property, Voorburg Park was officially dedicated to the City on July 11,1995. On July
25, 1995, the Faithful Performance Bond was exonerated by the Board of Directors. The
remaining surety bonds, issued by the Golden Eagel Insurance Company, are identified as
follows:
1. Labor and Materials Bond No. SUR 15 29 74 in the amount of $16,376.00.
2. Warranty Bond No. SUR 15 29 74 in the amount of $3,276.00.
Pursuant to the Parkland/Landscape Agreement, the Labor and Materials Bond shall be
released six months after the completion and acceptance of the park, pending the settlement
of any claims or obligations by the developer. Subsequently, the City Clerk has verified that
no claims have been filed by persons providing labor or materials for the construction of
Voorburg Park.
Therefore, staff is recommending a total exoneration of the Labor and Materials Bond for this
facility. The remaining warranty bond shall be retained for period of one year and until any
claims filed during the warranty period have been settled.
r:\yasinobkWoorburg.lxlr 021396
FISCAL IMPACT: None.
ATTACHMENTS:
Labor and Materials Bond.
Staff Report Dated July 25, 1995.
r:\ynainobk\voorburg.Mr 021396
CITY OF TEMECULA
Bond No. SUR 15 29 74
Premium included in
Performance Bond
PARIG_ANID/LANDSCAPE LABOR AND 'MATERIALS BOND
WI-II=-KEAS, the City of Temecula, State of California, and van Daele/Rancho 126, Ltd.
, (hereinafter desi~nated as "Principal") have entered into an A~eement whereby
Principal agTe, es to install and complete certainPaxkland Improvements, which said AgTeement,
dated March 25 , 19 93 , and identified as Project Signature Series ,
is hereby referred to and made a part hereof; and
WI-I]::REAS, under the terms of said Agreement, Principal is required before entering
upon the performance of the work, to fie a good and sufficient payment bond with the City of
Temecula, to secure the claims to which reference is made in Title 15 (commencing with Section
3082) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code of the State of California; and
NOW, ~ORE, we the principal and Golden Eagle Insllrant~urcl~y,Ya/e held
and fu-mly bound unto the City of Temecula, California, and all contractors, subcontractors,
laborers, materialmen, and other persons employed in the performance of the aforesaid
Agreement and referred to in Title 15 of the Civil Code, in the penal sum of $16,376:0~)lawful
money of the United States, for materials furnished or labor thereon of any kind, or for mounts
due under the Unemployment Insurance Act with respect to such work or labor, that Surety will
pay the same in an mount not exceeding the mount set forth.
As a part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to the face mount specified
therefor, there shall be included costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable
attorney's fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing such obligation, all to be taxed as
costs and included in any judgement rendered.
It is hereby expressly stipulated and ageed that this bond shall insure to the benefit of
any and all persons, companies and corporations entitled to file claims under Title 15
(commencing with Section 3082) of l~art 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code, so as to ~ve a fight
of action to them or theix assigns in any suit brought upon this bond.
Lf the condition of this bond is fully performed, then this obligation sha.ll become null and
void; otherwise, it shall be and remain in full force and effect.
The surety hereby stipulates and agees that no change, extension of time, alteration or
addition to the terms of the Ageement or to the work to be performed thereunder or the
specifications accompanying the same shall in anyway affect its obligations on this bond, and
it does hereby waive notice of any such changes, extension of time, alteration or addition to the
terms of the Agreement or to the work or to the specifications.
II',r WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument has been duly executed by the Principal and
Surety above named, on 1~arch 29 , 1993
Acknowledgement
stat.__~e of CALIFORNIA On 3-26-93 before me, Kristi L.
~ / of Riverside personally appearea Patrick J. Van Daele
Executive Vice President
Blanchard
r......KI~IS'I'I L. BLANCHARD
COMM. ~977337
~ Notary Ptt:ac-Callfon-,fa
· _
(This area for official Seal)
personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis at satisfactory evidence) to De
the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowl-
edged to me that he/she/they executed the some in his/her/their authorized
capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s], Or
the entity upon behalf of which the persOn(s) acted, executed the instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
AIl'ENTION NOTARY: Although rne ~nforrnafiOn reQueste<3 below is OPTIONAL, it cout¢l Dfevent ffauclulenl a~ochment at this Certificate to another Clocumenr
THiS CERTIFICATE MUST BE AT[ACHED Title or Type of Document
TO THE DOCUMENT DESCRIBED AT RIGHT: Number of Pages __Date of Document
rr- 110o ( 11/QO) Signer(s) Other Than Named Above
Cerrific:xce of Acknowtedgemen~
5T~ OF C~LLFORNIA
,)n March 29, 1993
?e~onsjly .~opes~d
R. Vic~es
b~ore me,
,qocarv PubLic
:e.,~onaL[y known m me. ' ' . to be me Oersonl~ whose namea! ~:ewsubscnbed to me
'.v~mm mscrumenc 3nd acknowte~,ed r~ me r, har. fi/shea~Lm{ executed the same m-iG~'/her/~T~[au~otce~ c~acx..wd~. ~qd th~ by
,
~her/~sl~zmr~ on the instant me Oe~om,~. or the enuff uoon Oen~ 0f wnic~ the oe~onl:~ acc~. ex~t~ c~e ~menc.
OFFICIAL SF..AL
VICTORIA M. CA:~PBE'.
NOTARY P,~BLIC- CAL:FORN;.\i
PRINCIPAL OFrICF,,
ORA~GF. COUNT;
C~MMISSION F.,XglRES NOV. ,5, 1,9~4
FISCAL IMPACT:
ATTACHMENTS:
None.
1.
2.
Labor and Materials Bond.
Staff Report Dated July 25, 1995.
r:\ynainobk\voorburg.bdr 021396
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
Board of Directors
Ronald E. Bradley, General Manager
July 25, 1995
Release of Faithful Performance Bond for Voorburg Park
PREPARED BY: Beryl Yasinosky, Development Services Analyst
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors:
Authorize the release of the Parkland/Landscape Faithful Performance
construction of Voorburg Park - Van Daele Development Corporation.
Bond
BACKGROUND: On May 11, 1993, the Board of Directors entered
Parkland/Landscape Agreement with:
Van Daele Development Corporation/Rancho 126 Ltd.
2900 Adams Street, Ste. C-25
Riverside, CA 92504
for the
into a
for the construction of a .26 acre park within Tract No. 22627-0, currently known as
Voorburg Park. Accompanying the parkland agreement were surety bonds issued by the
Golden Eagle Insurance Company, as follows:
Faithful Performance Bond No. SUR 15 29 74 in the amount of $32,751 .00.
Labor and Materials Bond No. SUR 15 29 74 in the amount of $16,376.00.
Warranty Bond No. SUR 15 29 74 in the amount of $3,276.00.
On July 11, 1995, the Board of Directors accepted the grant deed for Voorburg Park. The
park has been constructed pursuant to the approved plans and inspected and approved by the
City's Maintenance Superintendent.
Therefore, staff is recommending a total exoneration of the Faithful Perfor-mance Bond for this
facility. The Warranty Bond, in the amount of ten percent of the Faithful Performance Bond,
shall be retained for a period of one year and until any claims filed during the warranty period
have been settled.
r: \yuinobk\voorburg. bnd 07~95
Pursuant to the Parkland/Landscape Agreement, the Labor and Materials Bond shall be retained
for an additional six months to allow for the settlement of all claims and obligations concerning
those persons furnishing labor and materials for this project.
FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact is anticipated from the release of the
Parkland/Landscape Faithful Performance Bond.
ATTACHMENTS:
Vicinity Map
Parkland/Landscape Agreement
Surety Bonds
r:\ya~inobk\voorburg.bnd 072595
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
ITEM 1
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING
HELD JANUARY 23, 1996
A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency was called to order at
7:40 PM at the Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula,
California. Chairperson Patricia H. Birdsall presiding.
PRESENT: 4
AGENCY MEMBERS:
Lindemans, Roberrs, Stone,
Birdsall
ABSENT: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None
Also present were Executive Director Ronald E. Bradley, General Counsel Peter Thorson
and City Clerk June S. Greek.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None given.
CONSENT CALENDAR
It was moved by Agency Member Roberts, seconded by Agency Member Stone to approve
Consent Calendar Item No. I and 2. The motion was unanimously carried.
I Minutes
1.1 Approve the minutes of January 9, 1996.
2
CombininQ Balance Sheet as of Seotember 30.1995 and the Statement of
Revenues. Exoenditures and Changes in Fund Balance for the Three Months Ended
Seotember 30, 1995
2.1
Receive and file the Combining Balance Sheet as of September 30, 1995 and
the statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance for
the Three Months Ended September 30, 1995.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
None given.
AGENCY MEMBER'S REPORTS
None given.
r:~minutes.rda\O12396 -1-
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Agency Member Stone, seconded by. Agency Member Lindemans to
adjourn at 7:41 PM to a meeting on February 13, 1996, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation
Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. The motion was unanimously
carried.
Patricia H. Birdsall, Chairperson
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk
ATTEST:
Karel F. Lindemans, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
r:\minutes.rda\O 12396 -2-
ITEM 2
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE OFFICER
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
AGENDA REPORT
Executive Director/Redevelopment Agency Members
John Meyer, Senior Planner .~4JI
February 13, 1996
Temecula ONE
RECOMMENDATION:
Receive and File.
BACKGROUND:
In an effort to implement the General Plan Housing Element and the Implementation Plan of
the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, staff has formed a multi-disciplinary approach to
implementation of affordable housing and neighborhood revitalization programs. Titled
"Temecula ONE" (Operation Neighborhood Enrichment) the program is staffed by the
Community Development, Community Services, Police and City Manager Departments. Three
neighborhoods have been identified as participants in the program. They are: La Serena, Old
Town and the Rancho California/Margarita Corridor.
The Temecula One Program will allow the City to pro-actively deal with housing, law
enforcement and human services issues in a comprehensive manner. By allocating resources
today, the City will be able not only to stabilize these target areas, increase property values
and positively impact the quality of life for the entire community.
Overall Goals for the program include:
* Preserve and improve the existing affordable housing stock;
* Facilitate the development of new affordable housing resources;
Encourage positive community values/standards through active community
involvement;
* Enhance safety and security of the residential neighborhoods; and
Increase access to human services by advising residents of human service
resources and bringing service providers closer to the community
To better define the goals and objectives of Temecula ONE, the City has contracted with the
Resource Group to conduct an in-depth needs assessment survey which will solicit input about
R: \HOUS | NG\TONE. CC:$ 2/5/96 1
community needs directly from residents. The Resource Group is currently developing survey
questions, which will be reviewed and approved by staff. The survey will be conducted later
this month. Based on the results of the survey, staff will revise the Temecula One Goals and
Objectives, and bring them back to the Council for formal adoption.
The RDA is currently pursuing the acquisition of affordable housing sites and formulating re-
use proposals for property to be acquired. The acquisition of targeted properties will not only
increase the supply of affordable housing starts, but will also improve neighborhoods by
removing blighting conditions through rehabilitation and corrections of structures. The Agency
will also be providing rehabilitation assistance programs as contained in the current Capitol
Improvement Program,
In early March, the Police Department's Problem Oriented Policing Team will begin an outreach
program with neighborhood meetings. The POP Team and other Department Representatives
will meet with the La Serena neighborhood on March 2, 1996, and the Old Town
neighborhood on March 8, 1996. The POP Team is also developing a Property Owner and
Landlord Handbook, aimed as a practical guide for efficient property management.
The Human Resources program parameters will be defined after the needs assessment survey
is completed. The services will be tailored to the specific needs of the residents within the
neighborhoods.
FISCAL IMPACT:
A Program Budget will be included in the mid-year budget review.
R:\HOUSING\TONE.CC] 2/5/96
ITEM 3
APPROVAL
'CITY ATTORNEY
DIR. OF FINANCE
CITY MANAGER
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Redevelopment Agency Members
Ronald E. Bradley, Executive Director
February 13, 1996
Rancho West Apartments Proposed Tax-Exempt Financing
PREPARED BY:
Genie Roberts, Director of Finance
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Redevelopment Agency:
1. Adopt a Resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 96-
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA RELATING TO THE ISSUANCE OF BONDS FOR THE PURPOSE OF
FINANCING THE ACQUISITION BY THE COACHELLA VALLEY HOUSING
COALITION OF A MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL RENTAL PROJECT AND
RELATED FACILITIES
2. Appoint Jones, Hall, Hill & White as Bond Counsel for the issue;
Direct staff to prepare documents acceptable to the Executive Director, Redevelopment
Agency Attorney, and Bond Counsel to effectuate the sale of bonds to finance the
purchase of Rancho West Apartments.
BACKGROUND: On August 8, 1995, the Redevelopment Agency authorized the purchase
of Rancho West Apartments from the Resolution Trust Corporation (RTC) and assigned the
purchase to Coachella Valley Housing Coalition (CVHC), a nonprofit corporation who will own
and operate the property as an affordable housing project. (See attached Redevelopment
Agency Report).
A:IBRADLEYlRANCHO. WST 1 02/06/96
AGENDA REPORT:
Page 2
RANCHO WEST APARTMENTS
Subsequently, CVHC sought long term financing for the project from RTC. However the RTC
interest rate of 11.25% is extremely unfavorable as compared to estimated tax-exempt rates
of 6-1/2% to 7%. In order to gain access to tax-exempt financing, CVHC has obtained
agreement from the Bank of America to purchase a tax-exempt bond which would be issued
by the Redevelopment Agency on behalf of CVHC. This tax-exempt financing mechanism has
been used by many redevelopment agencies in California as a means of assisting nonprofit
corporations such as CVHC to develop housing to fulfill redevelopment agency affordable
housing requirements. The proposed bond issue is a mortgage revenue bond secured solely
by the real estate and repaid by rental income. The Redevelopment Agency is the issuer of
the bond, but will have no responsibility to secure the credit or repay the bonded
indebtedness. The Redevelopment Agency will act solely as the conduit between Bank of
America and CVHC in order to provide this qualified affordable housing project with a tax-
exempt interest rate mortgage. All issuance costs, including Bond Counsel fees, will be paid
by CVHC from acquisition funds previously authorized for this project.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
Attachment: August 8, 1995 City Council Report
A:IBR,,4DLEYlR,4NCHO. WST 2 02/06/96
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 96-
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA RELATING TO THE ISSUANCE OF BONDS FOR THE PURPOSE
OF FINANCING THE ACQUISITION BY THE COACHELLA VALLEY
HOUSING COALITION OF A MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL RENTAL
PROJECT AND RELATED FACILITIES
WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula (the "Agency") is
authorized to issue bonds pursuant to the provisions of the California Health and Safety Code
(the "Law") for the purpose of providing financing for the acquisition of multi-family residential
rental projects; and'
WHEREAS, the Coachella Valley Housing Coalition, a California non-profit corporation
CCVHC") has requested that the Agency issue and sell its revenue bonds (the "Bonds") pursuant
to the procedures specified in the Law for the purpose of making a loan to CVHC to finance the
acquisition of a 150-unit multi-family residential rental project and related and appurtenant
facilities (the "Project"), located 42200 Main Street (APN No. 922-061-021) in the City of
Temecula, and the Agency wishes to induce CVHC to acquire the Project; and
WHEREAS, United States Income Tax Regulations section 1. 103-18 provides generally
that proceeds for tax-exempt debt are not deemed to be expended when such proceeds are used
for reimbursement of expenditures made prior to the date of issuance of such debt unless certain
procedures are followed, among which is a requirement that (with certain exceptions), prior to
the payment of any such expenditure, the issuer must declare an intention. to reimburse such
expenditure; and
WHEREAS, it is in the public interest, for the public benefit and in furtherance of the
public purposes of the Agency that the Agency declare its official intent to reimb~rse the
expenditures referenced herein from the proceeds of the BondS.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Governing Board of the
Redevelopmerit Agency of the City of Temecula as follows:
Section 1. The Agency declares its intent to issue and sell the Bonds pursuant to the
procedures specified in the Law in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $2,500,000 for
the purposes of providing financing for the acquisition of the Project.
Section 2. The issuance and sale of the Bonds shall be upon such terms and conditions
as may be mutually agreed upon by the Agency, CVHC and the purchaser of said Bonds, and
shall be authorized by resolution of the Agency at a meeting duly held and conducted for such
purpose.
Section 3. The Agency hereby declares that it reasonably expects that a portion of the
proceeds of the Bonds will be used for reimbursement of expenditures for the acquisition of the
Project that are paid before the date of initial execution and delivery of the Bonds.
Section 4. The maximum amount of proceeds of the Bonds to be used for reimbursement
of expenditures for the construction and development of the Project that are paid before the date
of initial execution and delivery of the Bonds is $2,500,000.
Section 5. The foregoing declaration is consistent with the budgetary and financial
circumstances of the Agency in that there are no funds (other than proceeds of the Bonds) that
are reasonably expected to be (i) reserved, (ii) allocated or (iii) otherwise set aside, on a long-
term basis, by or on'behalf of the Agency, or any public entity controlled by the Agency, for
the expenditures for the acquisition of the Project that are expected to be reimbursed from the
proceeds of the Bonds.
Section 6. The Agency hereby finds that the issuance of the Bonds is a substantial
inducement to CVHC to acquire the Project.
Section 7. CVHC shall be responsible for the payment of all present and future costs
in connection with the issuance of the Bonds, including, but not limited to, any fees and
expenses incurred by the Agency in anticipation of the issuance of the Bonds, the costs of
printing any necessary disclosure materials relating to the Bonds, bond counsel fees and
expenses, financial advisor fees and costs, trustee fees and expenses, and any costs of printing
the Bonds.
Section 8. The adoption of this Resolution shall not obligate (i) the Agency to provide
financing to CVHC for the acquisition of the project or to issue the Bonds for purposes of such
financing; or (ii) the Agency, the City of Temecula (the "City"), the Planning Department of
the City or any other department of the City to approve any application or request for, or take
any other action in connection with, any permit or other action necessary for the acquisition,
repair, rehabilitation or operation of the Project.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the Governing Board of the Redevelopment Agency
of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 13th day of February, 1996.
Patricia H. Birdsall, Chairperson
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, Agency Secretary/City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )
CITY OF TEMECULA )
SS
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the
foregoing Resolution No. RDA 96- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the Governing
Board of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula on the 13th day of February,
1996, by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
AGENCY MEMBERS:
NOES:
AGENCY MEMBERS:
ABSENT:
AGENCY MEMBERS:
June S. Greek, Agency Secretary/City Clerk
ITEM 4
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
AGENCY REPORT
To:
From:
Datez
Subject:
Executive Director/Redevelopment Agency Members
Mary Jane McLarney, Assistant City Manager
February 13, 1996
Comparison of Current Loan Programs
Prepared by: Don Hillberg
Recommendation:
That the City Council review the Redevelopment Agency Loan Program and criteria and
provide direction to staff concerning the program.
Discussion:
The purpose of this analysis is to provide a comparison of various loan programs available
to small businesses in the City of Temecula and to point out any gaps in available funding.
Small Business Administration
The Small Business Administration was created in 1953 as an independent agency of the
federal government to assist the small business concerns in this country. It has
established financial assistance programs to meet the needs of the small business person
as well as the handicapped, women owned businesses, export/international trade loans and
Native American Affairs to name just 'a few. The SBA administers their lending programs
through approved lending institutions throughout the country.
The local institutions contacted all have similar programs offered under their SBA
programs. (See exhibit 1 for a comparison of the City's RDA program as compared to the
SBA and CalCAP). These lenders also have lending programs that they offer to small
business outside of the SBA umbrella.
California Capital Access "CalCAP"
Launched in March 1994 by the state of California, CalCAP is a loan insurance program
that partners banks with the state. Its mission is to extend higher than normal risk loans to
business owners who may not qualify for conventional financing. To qualify an owner
must have been in business in California for two years, have good credit and have
adequate cash flow based on the most recent years results to meet business obligations
plus the new debt payment.
Under this program, participating lenders set up reserve funds made up of premiums paid
by the state, the lender and the borrower to cover losses from a portfolio of program loans.
The state can put up to 4% of the loan balance while the lender and borrower can put up
to 2 % each into the reserve fund. What is unique about this program is that the reserve
covers losses for loans made by an individual lender and do not just cover losses for a
particular loan. Unlike a loan guarantee, this method gives the lender more flexibility in
that the whole reserve fund covers any individual loan that may default.
Commercial Lenders
Commercial banks, banks, thrifts and mortgage brokers can offer the business borrower
lines of credit, equipment loans and real estate loans with a wide rage of loan financing
options. With these lenders, in most cases the programs are very structured and require
the borrower to meet certain criteria and guidelines. The size of the loan is generally
larger, the loan to value is generally lower, financial ratios are higher and rates and terms
are either those offered to the most credit worthy borrower in the cases of banks or high if
the borrower is dealing with a thrift. The philosophy of the commercial lender is that they
are looking for the best borrower for the type of loan they are offering.
Redevelopment Agency
The Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula established a program to offer small
business loans to businesses within the City's Redevelopment Project Area. Currently,
loan funds can be used to buy, construct, expand or convert' commercial buildings or
finance machinery, fixtures and capital equipment. What makes this program unique is
that it is only eligible to businesses in the city that have been turned down for financing by
a SBA lender. It is a program designed to assist business borrowers that do not meet
other lending institutions criteria. Examples for rejection might be the time a business has
been operating, past credit problems either personal or business or the type of property or
equipment to be secured does not meet the lending guidelines.
The criteria for eligibility in the RDA Loan Program is as follows: Maximum loan request
not to exceed $100,000, the business must be located within the City's Redevelopment
Project Area, be organized for profit, demonstrate the ability to repay the loan from
business cash flow, display the necessary knowledge to operate the business profitably
and a written decline letter from a SBA area lender.
Although the RDA has been termed the "lender of last resort" and past experience has
shown that it cannot fund every loan request, it can help the small business that "falls
between the cracks." The RDA does not market this program, however during the past
year, staff has sent out flyers to thirty-eight prospective borrowers and loan applications to
sixteen.
In all of the programs outlined there are similarities and it would appear that they should be
able to meet the lending needs of the business community. But in reality, there are some
loans that do not meet the guidelines of the commercial lender, the Small Business
Administration or the other government sponsored loan programs. However, when looked
at are still viable Ioans~ These are the ones that "fall between the cracks." Credit, cash
flow, debt ratio, net worth are just some of the reasons other lenders might reject a
particular loan. In some instances, these loans can be structured to meet the RDA
guidelines and assist the business in obtaining financing. The gap that the RDA can fill is
the borrower who has not been able to meet other lenders criteria, however can
demonstrate that they can meet the criteria of eligibility for the RDA.
Enclosures:
Comparison of Programs (Exhibit 1)
Small Business Administration Loan Program
California Capital Access Program "CalCAP"
Commercial Lenders
RDA Activity Report
RDA Funded Loan Report
Comparison of Redevelopment Programs
City of Temecula RDA Loan Program
3
I!
Exhibit No. 1
Interest Rate
Equipment
Real Estate
Term
Equipment
Real Estate
Loan Amount
Owner Occupied
Debt to Net Worth
Debt Coverage Ratio
Personal Guarantees
Insurance (hazard)
Appraisals
Loan to Value
Equipment
Real Estate
RDA
Fixed at Prime
5 years
20 years
$100,000
Yes
4:1
1: 1 or better
As Required
Yes
Used Equipment
Real Estate
100%
SBA
Prime plus
7-10 years
25 years
$2 million
Yes
4:1
1.2: 1 or better
As Required
Yes
Real Estate
75 to 80%
90%
CalCAP
Prime plus
Fixed
7-10 years
25 years
$2 Million
Yes
4:1
1.25:1 or better
As Required
Yes
Real Estate
75 to 100%
75%
4
PROGRAM
7(a)
Guanntee
Program
502
Local
Development
Company
Programs
504
Certi~ed
Development
Company
Prognms
SBA LOAN PROGRAM
FUNCTION CUSTOMER
The program is designed m pwmote small business
formation and growth by guaranteerag long term loans m
qualified firms. Loans are available for many business
purposes ie: real estate, expansion, equipment, working
capital or inventory. SBA can guarantee up to
$500,000.00-70% m 90% LTV.
Small
Businesses
The 502 loan program targets long-term, fixed asset
financing to total gas.
Small
Businesses
The 504 loan pmgta. m provides certified development
compames (CDC) m small businesses m acquire real estate,
machinex~ and equipment, for expansion or modernizaaon
of facilities. Typically 504 loan proceeds are provided as
follows: 50% by an unguatant~t bank loan, 40% by a
SBA guaranteed debenture and 10% by the small business
customer. The maximum SBA debenture is $1 million.
Smsll
businesses
DELIVERY
THROUGH
Comlnetcinl
lending
institotiom
Certified
development
CODlp~eS
(CDC) through
COD~!]~CfCinl
ien~ng
~a,S~tUdODS
Debentures
through
ccrl~ed
development
companies
(privam
nonprofit
corporations
set up to
conU'ibute to
the economic
development of
or region
TERMS
up to prime
plus 2.75.
10 year term
for working
capital / 25
years for f'uted
assets. 2%
fee.
not available
Not available
PROGRAM
Lines of Credit
Equipment (FF&E)
Real Estate
CAIJFORNIA CAPITAL ACCESS PROGRAM "CalCAP"
FUNCTION CUSTOMER
This pwgnm is designed to encourage California financial instimtious
to make loans which are somewhat riskier than conventional loans.
Under this program, participating lenders set up special reserve funds
made up of premiums paid by the Authority, the lender and the
borrower to cover losses from a portfolio of program loans. Each
participating lender has its own reserve account.
The Authority can put in up to 4 % of the loan balance as reserves
against losses except when the portfolio is new that percentage can be
increased to 150% of maximum or 6%. The lender and the borrower
can each contribute up to 2% of the loan mount
Small Businesses
Sumall Business
Most important, the Program is designed to use a small mount of
public resources to generate large mounts of private lending, thus
allowing lenders to reach a significant number of businesses which
otherwise would not have access to capital.
Small Business
Prime plus 2.0 to
4.0. One month
to 18 months
term. Debt
coverage ratio of
lwl.
Prime plus 2.0 to
4.0. One to 5
year term. Debt
coverage ratio of
Itol
Prime plus 2.0 to
4.0. Balloon
payment mort.
25 yrs due in 10
to 15 yrs.
6
PROGRAM
Lines of credit
Equipment loans
No direct real
estate lending
program
PROGRAM
New Equipment
Used Equipmere
Real Estate
COMMERCIAL LENDERS
Bank of Commerce
FUNCTION
To meet the needs for shotz term working capital. One year wHover
provision and 30 day out of dcpt per year.
To guarantee conlinued gwwth of small to mid sized businesses. with the
ability to replace depreciated assets and purdmse new equipment and
vehicles
All loans secured by real estate are funded ~u'ough a 5BA loan program.
1st PACIFIC NATIONAL BANK
FUNCTION
Provide funds for small to medium size businesses for expansion
of facilities and equipment purchase.
The bank wffi look at all types of commercial real estate including
office buildings, warehouses, small commercial, gas stations and
restaurant.
CUSTOMER
Stnall
Businesses
Small
Businesses
n/'a
CUSTOMER
Small Business
Small Business
Small Business
RATE/
TERMS
Prime plus 1.5
to 2.0..05 fee
1 yr roHover
Prime plus 3,0
to3.5. 48to
60 month term.
RATE/
TERM
Base rate pins 1.0
Max term is 36
mo. Lendupto
75-80% of new
price.
Base rote plus
1.5%. Lendupto
75-80% of used
value per
appraisal.
Base plus 2.0.
Term set per type
of property.
PROGRAM
New F_xluipment
Used Equipment
Re~l Estate
North County Bank
FUNCTION
Provide funds for small to medium size businesses. Loan limit
from $200,000 to $1 million.
Loan on furniture, fixtures and equipment. Maximum loan
mount not to exceed $200,000. Documentation fee(rain $100.00)
To purchasc or build commercial real estate. Loan amount not w
exceed $500,000. LTV can vary depending on propew/.
CUSTOMER
Small Business
Small Business
Small Business
9% to I0%. 1 yr
Rollover. Fees
(varies)
Fixed rote. Rate
and term varies.
Term not to
exceed life of
equipment.
Balloon payment.
Fixed and variable
rate programs.
7
Month
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
RDA Activity Report
Numbers Only
Flyers Mailed
9
2
6
3
5
3
3
2
1
2
0
2
Applications Mailed
2
0
2
1
2
3
1
2
0
1
0
2
Totals
9/2
11/2
17/4
20/15
25/7
28/10
31/11
33/13
34/13
36/14
36/14
38/16
CITY
C!aren~ont
Santa Ana
Brea
Ontario
COMPARISON OF REDEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS
TYPE
Small
Business
Assistance
RATE/ LOAN ALLOWABLE
TERM AMOUNT IMPROVEMENTS
Not stated To $100,000
Direct 25 yrs due in $20,000 to
Commercial 10 $100,000
Rehabilitation Prime minus
Loan Program (-) 2
504 Debenture
Commercial
Rehabilitation
Loan Program
Center City
Commercial
Rehabilitation
Pmgram
10 to 20 yrs
Rate not
stated
To $1.875M
20 yrs To $75,000
6% 50% Matching
funds
10 yrs
Prime minus
(-) 4 (not to
exceed 5 %
or below
3%)
$15,000 to
$150,000
Exterior or interior improvements
Exterior Improvements
Purchase or remodel of existing
buildings, new consauction
Exterior remodeling, common space
upgradmg, parking improvement
Exterior and interior improvements
REQUIREMENTS
RF_,VrRI~ONS
Must demonsu-ate that
borrower has been
turned down by another
lender-in
Redevelopmere Zone
Must be within
designated am
Improvements to
commercial buildings in
designated project areas
Building must exist in
Center City
Redevelopment Project
Area
10
I
(!
City of Temecula
Redevelopment Agency Small Business Loan Program
To be eligible for this program, you and your business must meet the requirements
listed below, If in fact you meet these requirements, the term of the loan would be for a
minimum of 5 years, amortized over the life of new equipment financed, and not to exceed
the life of the lease for tenants improvements. If the loan is for real estate improvements,
the term may be extended to 20 years. These funds are to be used to construct, expand,
or convert commercial buildings and structures or to finance manufacturing machinery,
fixtures, and capital equipment. The maximum loan amount is $100,000, and the rate is
fixed at prime (locked in at time of City Council approval).
Reauirements for Eliaibilitv
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Your business must be organized for profit.
New business ventures must contribute at least 30% cash to the total '
project cost. Existing businesses must not exceed a 4:1 debt to equity ratio
including the payment of the new loan.
You must establish that you have or can obtain the necessary knowledge to
operate the business profitably.
You must establish the marketability of your product or service.
You must show and support the ability to repay the loan from the business
cash flow.
You must have been previously declined and provide a declination letter from
a SBA lender.
The loan must be secured with collateral equal to 100% of the loan amount.
You will be required to pay a $250.00 processing fee, plus actual costs such
as LJCC fees, title and appraisal, credit report, recording, etc. These fees
may be paid in cash by the borrower or out of the loan proceeds at the time
of closing.
11
OLD TOWN WESTSIDE
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT
FINANCING AUTHORITY
ITEM 1
MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE OLDTOWN WESTSIDE
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY
HELD JANUARY 9, 1996
A regular meeting of the Old Town Westside Community Facilities District Financing
Authority was called to order at 7:54 PM at the Community Recreation Center, 30875
Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. Chairperson Patricia H. Birdsall presiding.
4 BOARD MEMBERS:
0 BOARD MEMBERS:
PRESENT:
ABSENT:
Lindemans, Roberrs, Stone, Birdsall
None
Also present were Executive Director Ronald E. Bradley, City Attorney Peter Thorson and
City Clerk June S. Greek.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None given.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Board Member Stone announced an abstention.
It was moved by Board Member Lindemans, seconded by Board Member Roberrs to
approve Consent Calendar Item No. 1. The motion carried as follows:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Minutes
1.1
1.2
3 BOARD MEMBERS: Lindemans, Roberts, Birdsall
0 BOARD MEMBERS: None
0 BOARD MEMBERS: None
1 BOARD MEMBERS: Stone
Approve the minutes of December 12, 1995.
Approve the minutes of December 19, 1995.
Mi nu tes .fa\0 10 9 9 6 - 1 -
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Board Member Lindemans, seconded by Board Member Roberrs to
adjourn at 7:55 PM to a meeting on February 13, 1996, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation
Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. The motion was unanimously
carried.
Patricia H. Birdsall, Chairperson
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk/
Authority Secretary
Minutes.fa\010996 -2-
ITEM 2
DIR. OF FINAN~
CITY MANAGER
OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT
FINANCING AUTHORITY
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Authority Members
Ronald E. Bradley, City Manager
February 13, 1996
Financings for .Old Town Area Public Improvements and the Western
Bypass .Corridor
RECOMMENDATION: That the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District
Financing Authority adopt the resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. FA 96-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE OLD
TOWN/WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY
AMENDING RESOLUTIONS OF INTENTION FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES
DISTRICT NO. I (OLD TOWN AREA PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS) TO INCLUDE
ADDITIONAL LAND WITHIN THE PROPOSED DISTRICT, AUTHORIZE THE
FINANCING OF ADDITIONAL IMPROVEMENTS, APPROVE A REVISED RATE
AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAXES, AND INCREASE THE
AUTHORIZED BONDED INDEBTEDNESS OF THE DISTRICT
BACKGROUND: On September 12, 1995, the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities
District Financing Authority (the "Authority") adopted two resolutions (the "Resolutions of
Intention") relative to its intention to establish a Community Facilities District No. 1 (Old Town
Area Public Improvements) (the "District"). The resolutions made reference to the proposed
boundaries of the District as set forth on a map on file with the Secretary of the Authority.
On October 10, 1995, the Authority adopted a resolution adding territory to the District which
included the land proposed for the construction of a new arena.
On September 12, 1995, the Authority also .adopted resolutions of intention to form a
Community Facilities District No. 2 (Westside Area Public Improvements) to finance the
Western Bypass improvements in the event that an assessment district for such improvements
could not be formed. The City has undertaken proceedings to form the assessment district;
however, it now appears that only the parcels intended to be included within the District will
be assessed for the Western Bypass improvements, and the Redevelopment Agency will
contribute funds to pay for construction of improvements in lieu of assessments on .other
property owners.
R: tNOR TONL tAGENDASIRNRESO. AGN 02/05/96
In light of the foregoing, the landowners within the District have requested that the Authority
expand the scope of the District to include both the Old Town area improvements and the
Western Bypass improvements, to add additional territory to the District, to raise the
authorized indebtedness of the District and to approve a revised rate and method of
apportionment for the District. Adoption of the resolution will accommodate this request, and
allow for the completion of the Old Town area improvements and the Western Bypass
improvements by means of a single financing district, thereby reducing the complexity of the
original financing plan, reducing City administrative expenses in connection with the financing
of these improvements, and otherwise allowing for a simpler marketing plan for the proposed
bond issue.
The resolution listed above amends the Resolutions of Intention to include within the proposed
boundaries of the District additional land that would otherwise have been assessed for the
Western Bypass improvements, and directs the Secretary to record a second amended
boundary map in connection therewith. The resolution also amends the Resolutions of
Intention to add the Western Bypass as an eligible improvement to be financed by the District,
and amends the special tax formula and the bonded indebtedness limit for the District to
accommodate the financing of those improvements. Finally, the date of the public hearings
called pursuant to the Resolutions of Intentions has also been amended to March 26, 1996,
and the Secretary has been directed to publish a notice of revised public hearing date.
Attachment: Resolution
R:INORTONL LAGENDASIFINRESO.AGN 02/05/96
RESOLUTION NO. FA 96-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
THE OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITW_S
DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY AIVfENDING
RESOLUTIONS OF INTENTION FOR COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1 (OLI) TOWN AREA
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS) TO INCLUDE ADDITIONAL
LAND WITHIN THE PROPOSED DISTRICT,
AUTHORIZE THE FINANCING OF ADDITIONAL
IMPROVEMENTS, APPROVE A REVISED RATE AND
METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAXES,
AND INCREASE THE AUTHORIZED BONDED
INDEBTEDNESS OF THE DISTRICT
WHEREAS, On September 12, 1995, the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities
District Financing Authority (the "Authority") adopted its Resolution No. FA 95-02 and FA
95-03 (collectively, the "Initial Resolution") expressing the intention of the Board of
Directors of the Authority to form the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District
Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 1 (Old Town Area Public
Improvements) (the "District"), to levy a special tax within the District to pay the costs of
certain public improvements identified therein (the "Public Improvements"), and to issue
bonded indebtedness to finance such costs; and
WHEREAS, Resolution No. FA 95-02 approved a proposed boundary map for the
District in the form on file with the Secretary (the "Original Map"), and the boundaries of
the District referred to in the Initial Resolution were as set forth on the Original Map; and
WHEREAS, On October 10, 1995, the Authority adopted its Resolution No. FA 95-
06 amending the proposed boundaries of the District to include additional territory, and on
December 12, 1995, the Authority adopted a Resolution making a finding that additional time
was required in order to complete the public hearings called pursuant to the Initial
Resolutions, and continuing said public hearings to January 9, 1996; and
WHEREAS, On January 10, 1996, this Board of Directors further continued the
public hearings called. pursuant to the Initial Resolutions to February 13, 1996; and
WHEREAS, the proponents of the District have now requested that additional
territory be added to the boundaries of the District, the District be authorized to finance
additional improvements, the proposed rate and method of apportionment of special taxes for
the District be revised, and the amount of bonded indebtedness that the District can incur be
increased, all as further set forth below; and
WHEREAS, this Board of Directors now desires to amend the Initial Resolutions as
requested by the proponents of the District and set forth below, to set a new date for the
public hearings described in the Initial Resolutions and to direct publication of a revised
notice of public hearing in the form herein approved.
Rcsos 94 I
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of Directors of the Old
Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority as follows:
1. The proposed boundaries of the District are hereby mended to include all of the
land indicated on the Second Amended Map of the District on file with the Secretary, which
boundaries are hereby preliminarily approved and to which map reference is hereby made for
further particulars. The Secretary is hereby directed to record, or cause to be recorded, said
Second Amended Map of the boundaries of the District in the office of the County Recorder
within fifteen (15) days of the dam of adoption of this Resolution, but in any event at least
fifteen days prior to the public heating referred to in Section 6 below.
2. The Initial Resolutions are here amended to reflect that the proposed boundaries of
the District are as set forth in the Second Amended Map of the District referred to in Section
1 above.
3. The description of the Public Improvements proposed to be financed by the
District, as set forth in Exhibit A to Resolution No. FA 95-02, are hereby amended to
include the following: (a) Construction of a new roadway as a four (4) lane divided roadway
from near the Front Street/Highway 79 South intersection, to Vincent Moraga Drive, a
distance of approximately 5,600 feet. Vincent Moraga Drive, a four (4) lane undivided
roadway, will be constructed from this intersection, northerly, to join existing Vincent
Moraga Drive, approximately 1,200 feet. Roadway grading will be completed for the future
extension of the Western Bypass Corridor approximately 3,400 feet from Vincent Moraga
Drive to join Rancho California Road. The work will include, but not be limited to, the
following; (i) acquisition of necessary right-of-way, (ii) construction of a bridge over
Murrieta Creek and Rancho California Road, (iii) construction of sidewalks, curbs and
gutters, (iv) construction of roadway between the curbs, consisting of an approximately 78-
foot wide roadway with an approximately 12-foot wide raised median island, (v) installation
of landscaping and irrigation, (vi) installation of water system facilities, (vii) installation of
sanitary sewer system, (viii) installation of street lighting system, (ix) construction and/or
installation of any facilities or appurtenances incident to any of the foregoing, (x) costs of
engineering, design, acquisition of land and/or public easements, planning, insurance, legal
and accounting expenses and coordination related to the above-listed facilities; and (b) The
elimination of any fixed special assessment liens imposed on any property located in the
District pursuant to assessment proceedings to finance all or any portion of the improvements
described in the preceding clause (a).
4. The proposed rate and method of apportionment of the special taxes for the
District, as set forth in Exhibit B to Resolution No., FA 95-02, is hereby amended in its
entirety to be as set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and by this reference incorporated
herein.
5. By reason of the additional Public Improvements described in Section 3 above, the
amount required for financing of the portion of the costs of the Public Improvements to be
financed by the District has increased by up to $10,000,000, such that it is necessary to
increase the maximum bonded indebtedness for the District from $12,500,000 (as referenced
in Section 6 of Resolution No. FA 95-02, and Sections 1 and 2 of Resolution No. FA 95-03)
Resos 94 2
to $27,500,000. Accordingly, the Initial Resolutions are hereby amended by deleting
therefrom, in each place it appears in the Initial Resolutions, "$12,500,000,* and by inserting
therein, in lieu thereof, "$27,500,000."
6. The Secretary is hereby directed to publish a notice of a revised date for the
public heating referred to in Section 10 of Resolution No. FA 95-02 and Section 4 of
Resolution No. FA 95-03, said notice of the revised date to be given by publication one time
in a newspaper of general circulation circulated within the District. The Publication of said
notice shall be completed as soon as practicable, but in any event at least seven ('7) days
before March 26, 1996, which is hereby designated as the revised date set for said public
hearings. Said notice shall substantially be in the form of Exhibit A hereto.'
7. Except as amended pursuant to this Resolution and Resolution No. FA 95-06, the
provisions of Resolution Nos. FA 95.02 and FA 95.03 are hereby ratified and confirmed.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the Board of Directors of the Old
Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority at a regular meeting held
on the 13th day of February, 1996.
ATTEST:
Patricia H. Bridsall, Chairperson
June S. Greek, Authority Secretary/City Clerk
[SEAL]
R~sos ~4 :~
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, HEREBY DO CERTIFY that
the foregoing Resolution No. FA 96- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the Board of
Directors of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority. on
the 13th day of February, 1996, by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
BOARD MEMBERS:
NOES:
BOARD MEMBERS:
ABSENT:
BOARD MEMBERS:
June S. Greek, Agency Secretary/City Clerk
Resos 94 4
EXHIBIT A
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT
FINANCING AUTHORITY
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1
(OLD TOWN AREA PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS)
Notice is hereby given that on February 13, 1996 the Board of Directors of the Old
Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority (the "Authority") adopted
a Resolution (the "Amending Resolution") approving a second revised boundary map for its
proposed Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority Community
Facilities District No. 1 (Old Town Area Public Improvements) (the "District"), authorizing
the financing of additional facilities by the District, approving a revised rate and method of
apportionment of special taxes for the District and increasing the authorized bonded
indebtedness of the District, and otherwise amending its Resolution Nos. FA 95-02 and FA
95-03 relating to the District previously adopted by the Board of Directors on September 12,
1995.
The Amending Resolution changed the date of the public hearings called pursuant to
Resolutions Nos. FA 95-02 and FA 95-03 from October 17, 1995 to March 26, 1996.
Accordingly, March 26, 1996 at 7:00 p.m. or as soon as possible thereafter, in the
Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California, be, and the
same are hereby appointed and fixed as the time and place when and where the Board of
Directors of the Authority, as legislative body for the District, will conduct public hearings
on the establishment of the District and consider and finally determine whether the public
interest, convenience and necessity require the information of the District, the levy of special
tax as therein and the issuance of bonded indebtedness therefore.
At said hearings, the testimony of all interested persons or taxpayers for or against
the establishment of the District, the extent of the Distxict, the furnishings of the specified
types of facilities to be financed by the District and the issuance of bonds for the District will
be heard. Any person interested may file a protest in writing as provided in Section 53323
of the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982. If fifty percent (50%) or more of the
registered voters, or six registered voters, whichever is more, residing in the territory
proposed to be included in the District (as said territory is set forth in the revised boundary
map for the District approved pursuant to the Amending Resolution), or the owners of one-
half or more of the area of land in the territory proposed to be included in the District (as
said territory is set forth in the revised boundary map for the District approved pursuant to
the Amending Resolution) and not exempt from the special tax, ffie written protests against
the establishment of the District or the issuance of bonds therefore and the protests are not
withdrawn to reduce the value of the protests to less than a majority, the Board of Directors
shall take no further action to create the District or levy the special taxes or issue such debt
for a period of one year from the date of decision of the Board of Directors, and if the
majority protests of the registered voters or landowners are only against the furnishing of a
Resos 94 5
type or types of facilities within the District, or against levying a specified special tax, those
types of facilities or the specified special tax will be eliminated from the proceedings to form
the District.
(~ Copies of the foregoing resolutions are available for inspection in the office of the
~ity Clerk of the City of Temecula.
Dated: ,1996
June S. Greek, Authority Secretary/City Clerk
Resos 94 6
EXHIBIT B
RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAXES
OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT
FINANCING AUTHORITY
Community Facilities District No. 1
(Old Town Area Public Improvements)
A special tax shall be levied on each Parcel of land within the Old Town/Westside Community
Facilities District Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 1 (Old Town Area Public
Improvements) (the "District"), and collected according to the Special Tax Liability determined by
the Responsible Party of the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing
Authority (the "Authority") through the application of the following procedures. All of the
property within the District, unless otherwise exempted by law or the express provisions of the
rate and method of apportionment expressed below, shall be taxed to the extent and in the manner
provided below.
It is intended that all special taxes applicable to Parcels be collected in the same manner and at the
same time 'as ordinary ad valorem properly taxes, and that special taxes so levied will be subject to
the same penalties and procedures, sale and lien priority in case of delinquency as is provided for
ad valorem taxes, subject to any covenant for judicial forec!osure with respect thereto in any Fiscal
Agent Agreement for any Bonds of the Authority for the District. Notwithstanding the foregoing,
the Authority may collect the special taxes at such other times or in such other manner as
necessary or convenient to satisfy the obligations of the District.
MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX
The maximum special tax that may be levied in the Fiscal Year ending June 30, 1996 On any
Parcel shall not exceed the sum of:
plus
(i)
(ii)
The maximum building special tax rate of $17. O0 per building square foot,
multiplied times the sum of the Building Floor Area for all buildings on the Parcel;
The maximum land special tax rate of $15.00 per land square foot, multiplied times
the Land Area of the Parcel.
The special tax shall be levied annually. The maximum building special tax and the maximum
land special tax shall increase each Fiscal Year from the maximum special tax for the Fiscal Year
ending June 30, 1996 by 2%, compounded annually. A Parcel shall be subject to the maximum
special tax for not more than 40 years. In no event shall the maximum special tax on any Parcel
used for private residential purposes exceed any limitation imposed under Section 53321 of the
California Government Code.
..\cfdl 96-2 r&m February 7, 1996 B1
ASSIGNMENT TO CATEGORIES; LEVY
ANNUAL TAX CATEGORIES
On or about July 1 of each year, but in any event in sufficient time to include the levy of the
special taxes on the County's secured tax roll, the Responsible Party shall determine for each
Parcel within the District, whether or not such Parcel is Taxable Properly. Parcels subject to levy
shall be determined based upon the records of the County Assessor as of the March 1 preceding
such July 1.
LEVY
The Responsible Party shall then determine the estimated aggregate Special Tax Liability for the
Fiscal Year commencing such July 1, and levy on each Parcel which is Taxable Property, as
follows:
Step 1
Determine the Building Floor Area for each respective Parcel which is Taxable
Property, and the total Building Floor Area for all Parcels which are then Taxable
Property in the District.
Step 2:
Calculate the annual building tax rate by dividing an amount equal to 85% of the
Special Tax Liability, by the total Building Floor Area for all Parcels which are then
Taxable Property.
Step 3:
Multiply the total Building Floor Area for each respective Parcel which is Taxable
Property by the lesser of:
Or
(i)
(ii)
the annual building tax rate;
the maximum building special tax rate for the Fiscal Year commencing such
July 1.
Step 4:
Determine the Land Area for each Parcel of Taxable Property in the District and the
total Land Area for all Parcels which are then Taxable Property in the District.
Step 5:
Calculate the annual land tax rate as the lesser of:
Or
(i)
(ii)
(the sum of the Special Tax Liability less the total of the funds generated for
all Parcels which are then Taxable Property under Step 3 above), divided by
the total Land Area (by square footage) for all Parcels which are then
Taxable Property;
the maximum land special tax for the Fiscal Year commencing such July 1.
..\cfdl 96-2 r&m February 7, 1996 B2
Step 6:
Multiply the Land Area for each Parcel which is Taxable Property by the annual
land tax rate determined under Step 5.
Step 7:
Calculate the sum of the building tax (from Step 3) and the land tax (from Step 6)
for each Parcel which is Taxable Property.
PREPAYMENTS
Special tax prepayments may be made for property subject to the levy of the special taxes. A
particular Parcel may prepay the special tax, provided that all authorized Bonds that are to be
issued, have been issued. Any property owner in the District that desires to prepay the annual
special taxes on a particular Parcel shall notify the RespOnsible Party in writing of such intention
not less than 90 days prior to an interest payment date and the prepayment must be made not less
than 45 days prior to such interest payment. The following must be applied for a prepayment of a
particular Parcel:
a,
The prepayment amount for a particular Parcel shall be calculated by the Responsible
Party, as follows:
Compute the special tax for such Parcel by the total special tax for the then current
Fiscal Year.
The prepayment amount is computed by dividing the special tax for the Parcel by
the total special tax for all properties for the then current Fiscal Year within the
District, and multiplying the results by the principal amount of any outstanding
Bonds. The result shall be rounded up to the nearest five thousand dollars ($5,000);
provided however, that if the Authority is provided with prepayments of special tax
for more than one Parcel at the same time, then the total prepayments shall be
aggregated and the aggregated prepayment amount shall be rounded up to the
nearest five thousand dollars ($5,000).
The prepayment amount calculated in (2) above for a particular Parcel will be (a)
increased in the amount of: (i) applicable redemption premium, if any, on the'
Bonds; (ii) an amount determined by the Responsible Party to offset any difference
between the amount needed to pay debt service on the Bonds and the amount
derived from the reinvestment of the prepaid special tax pending the redemption of
such Bonds; and (iii) amount determined by the Responsible Party to pay for the
applicable Administrative Expenses to provide such prepayment; and (b) decreased
for any reduction in Bond reserves due to the prepayment.
Determination of the total amount needed by the Responsible Party shall be
conclusive, absent manifest error.
..\cfdl 96-2 r&m February 7, 1996 B3
The Parcel with respect to which prepayment is made must not be delinquent in any
payment of special taxes previously levied within the District. Prepayment shall not relieve
any property owner from paying those special taxes which have already become due and
payable, and a Notice of Cessation of Special Tax Lien shall not be recorded against any
Parcel pursuant to California Government Code Section 53344, until all special taxes with
respect to that Parcel have been paid.
DEFINITIONS
Administrative Expenses means any or all of the following: the fees and expenses of the Fiscal
Agent (including any fees or expenses of its counsel), the expenses of the Authority and the City in
carrying out their respective duties with respect to the District (including, but not limited to, the
levy and collection of the special taxes) including the fees and expenses of their respective
counsel, any fees of the County related to the District or the collection of special taxes, an
allocable share of the salaries of the Authority and the City staff directly related thereto and a
proportionate amount of Authority and the City general administrative overhead related thereto,
any amounts paid by the Authority or the City, respectively, from its own funds with respect to the
District or the Bonds, and all other costs and expenses of the Authority, the City or the Fiscal
Agent incurred in connection with the discharge of their respective duties under the Fiscal Agent
Agreement and, in the case of the Authority and the City, in any way related to administration of
the District.
Authority means the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority.
Bonds means any bonds of the Authority issued for the District under Mello-Roos Community
Facilities Act of 1982, as amended, authorized to be issued under the Resolution of Issuance.
Building Floor Area means the area included within the surrounding exterior walls of a building,
including each floor of multiple story buildings, exclusive of vent shafts and courts (defined here
as open and unobstructed to the sky). The Building Floor Area will be determined by the
Responsible Party by reference to City or County approved building plans or other such
documentation as the Responsible Party shall determine.
City means the City of Temecula.
County means the County of Riverside.
Debt Service, for each Fiscal Year, is the total annual principal and interest payable on the Bonds
during the calendar year which commences in such Fiscal Year, less any capitalized interest and
any other amounts remaining in the bond fund held under the Fiscal Agent Agreement as of the
end of the previous Fiscal Year available to make such payments.
..\cfdl 96-2 r&m February 7, 1996 B4
District means the Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority
Community Facilities District No. 1 (Old Town Area Public Improvements).
Fiscal Agent means the Fiscal Agent designated under the Fiscal Agent Agreement.
Fiscal Agent Agreement means the agreement by that name approved by the Resolution of
Issuance, and as it may be amended and/or supplemented from time to time.
Fiscal Year means the period starting on July 1 and ending the following June 30.
Land Area means the measure of land area of a Parcel, in square feet of land, rounded up to the
nearest whole integer.
Parcel means any County Assessor's parcel or portion thereof that is within the boundaries of the
District based on the equalized tax rolls of the County.
Resolution of Issuance is any Resolution adopted by the Authority authorizing the issuance of
Bonds.
Responsible Party is any person or persons who the Authority may appoint from time to time to
compute the leW of the special taxes within the District.
Special Tax Liability for any Fiscal Year is an amount sufficient to pay Debt Service for such
Fiscal Year, Administrative Expenses for such Fiscal Year, an amount necessary, as determined by
the Responsible Party, to offset projected tax delinquencies that may occur in such Fiscal Year
based on prior Fiscal Year delinquencies and to otherwise replenish any reserve fund established
for the Bonds, and all payments required to be made in the applicable Fiscal Year under the Fiscal
Agent Agreement for the Bonds and any supplements thereto.
Taxable Property shall mean all real property within the boundaries of the District that is owned
in fee by T.Z.B.G., Inc. or BFD/OTEP, a California corporation, at any time between the adoption
of the resolution of formation for the District and the date that is one year after the adoption of the
resolution of formation, provided however, that the following property shall be exempt from the
special tax (i) any real property that is exempt from taxation by law, (ii) any acres of land owned,
conveyed or irrevocably offered for dedication to and accepted by a public agency, including but
not limited to, the federal government, the State of California and any local governmental agency,
and (iii) land which is a public right-of-way or which is an unmanned utility easement making
impractical its utilization for other than the purpose set forth in the easement.
..\cfdl 96-2 r&m February 7, 1996 B5
I!
OLD TOWN WESTSIDE
IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY
ITEM 1
MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE OLD TOWN WESTSIDE
IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY
HELD JANUARY 9, 1996
A regular meeting of the Old Town Westside Community Facilities District Financing
Authority was called to order at 7:55 PM at the Community Recreation Center, 30875
Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. Chairperson Patricia H. Birdsall presiding.
PRESENT: 4
ABSENT: 0
BOARD MEMBERS: Lindemans, Roberrs, Stone, Birdsall
BOARD MEMBERS: None
Also present were Executive Director Ronald E. Bradley, City Attorney Peter Thorson and
City Clerk June S. Greek.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None given,
CONSENT CALENDAR
It was moved by Board Member Lindemans, seconded by Board Member Roberts to
approve Consent Calendar Item No. 1. The motion carried as follows:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Minutes
1.1
1.2
3 BOARD MEMBERS: Lindemans, Roberts, Birdsall
0 BOARD MEMBERS: None
0 BOARD MEMBERS: None
I BOARD MEMBERS: Stone
Approve the minutes of December 12, 1995.
Approve the minutes of December 19, 1995.
Minutes.otwa\010996 -1 -
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Board Member Stone, seconded by Board Member Lindemans to adjourn
at 7:56 PM to a meeting on February 13, 1996, 7:00 PM, Community Recreation Center,
30875 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. The motion was unanimously carried.
Patricia H. Birdsall, Chairperson
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk/
Authority Secretary
Minutes.otwa\O10996 -2-
ITEM 27
APPROV/~/Z~~
CITY ATTORNEY
(!
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
· City Council/City Manager
Gary Thornhill, Community Development Director
February 13, 1996
Planning Application No. PA95-0113- Deletion of Conditions of Approval and
Release of Bonds for Parcel Map 23969
Prepared By:
Craig D. Ruiz, Assistant Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 96-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 95-0113
TO DELETE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR PARCEL MAP
23969 KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 940-310-0'?.,
045, 046,047, & 048 and
e
Delete Conditions of Approval No. 21,22 and 23 for Parcel Map No. 23969;
and
3. Release - Bond No. 117 40 76 for Labor and Materials and Faithful
Performance; and
4. Release - Bond No. 117 40 78 for Subdivision Warranty
BACKGROUND
Parcel Map 23969 was originally submitted to the County of Riverside in 1989 and transferred
to the City of Temecula upon incorporation. On September 25, 1990, the Temecula City
Council approved Tentative Parcel Map 23969. The project approval contained conditions of
approval that required the improvement of Pujol Street adjacent to the subject project. Bonds
were provided to the City by then property owner Omdahl Enterprises for the necessary
improvements and the map was subsequently recorded in February of 1991.
R:\STAFF'RFl~l13PA95.CC 2/5/96 ctlr
On November 1, 1995, the current property owner filed an application with the City seeking
a waiver of the conditions to improve Pujol Street. The deletion of the conditions will provide
for the release of the related improvement bonds.
On November 30, 1995, a Planning Director Hearing was held on the request to delete said
conditions of approval. At that meeting, the Director approved the applicant's request.
However, subsequent to the hearing, it was determined that the City Council, and not the
Planning Director, was the appropriate hearing body for an amendment to a final map. Thus,
this item, plus the release of bonds .have been noticed for a public hearing before the City
Council.
DISCUSSION
Typically, staff will condition a project to provide improvements to adjacent streets.
Conditions of approval for Parcel Map 23969 included the improvement of Pujol Street and
prohibiting the project from using Pujol to access the site. In addition to the conditions, there
is an approximate 25 foot grade separation between the site and Pujol Street that physically
prohibits the site from accessing Pujol Street.
Because no access is proposed or necessary for the subdivision, staff supports the applicant's
contention that there is no nexus between the condition to improve Pujol Street and the
approval of the map. Pujol Street is a dead-end street and the improvement of which
provides no benefit to the subject property. Should the Council delete said conditions, the
necessity of the bonds is removed and can thus be released.
FISCAL IMPACT
None.
Attachments:
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Resolution No 96- - Page No. 3
Vicinity Map - Page No. 7
Conditions of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map 23.969 - Page No. 9
Minutes from the August 20, 1990 Planning Commission Meeting - Page No. 10
Minutes from the September 17, 1990 City Council Meeting - Page No. 11
Minutes from the September 25, 1990 City Council Meeting - Page No. 12
R:~STAFTRFI~l13PA95.CC 215196 cdr 2
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
RESOLUTION NO. 96-
R:\STAFPRI~II3PA95.C~ 1/25/96
ATTACHMENT NO. I
1
RESOLUTION NO. 96-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 95-0113
TO DELETE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR PARCEL MAP
23969 KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 940-310-044,
045, 046,047, & 048
WHEREAS, First Pacific National Bank filed Planning Application No. PA 95-0113 in
accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Riverside County Land Use and
Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference;
WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PA95-0113 was processed in the time and
manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the City Council previously approved Tentative Parcel Map 23969 on
September 25, 1990 at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time
interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE,
DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Findines.
A. The City Council in approving Planning Application No. PA95-0113, makes the
following findings, to wit:
1. That the conditions of approval to improve Pujol Street, which are
proposed to be deleted, do not provide a direct benefit to the property owner of record.
2. That the conditions of approval to improve Pujol Street, that are proposed
to be deleted, would not typically be required by the City of Temecula.
3. That the proposal to delete said conditions of approval would not create
a situation that would be inconsistent with the General Plan for the City of Temecula.
4. That the proposal to delete said conditions of approval is not likely to
cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and unavoidably injure fish or wildlife
or their habitat.
5. That the proposal to delete said conditions of approval is not likely to
cause serious public health problems.
6. That the proposal to delete said conditions of approval is not likely to
cause conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through, or use of,
property within the proposed land division. A land division may be approved if it is found that
R:\STAFFRPTXI13PA95.CC 1125196 cdr 4
alternate easements for access or for use will be provided and that they will be substantially
equivalent to ones previously acquired by the public. This subsection shall apply only to
easements of record or to easements established by judgment of a court of competent
jurisdiction.
B. As conditioned pursuant to Section 3, Planning Application No.
proposed, is compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community.
· 8S
Section 2. Environmental Comoliance. An Initial Environmental Assessment was
prepared for this project and it was determined that the project would have no effect on the
environment and was therefore exempt from requirements of the California Environmental
Quality Act per Section 15061 (3).
Section 3. Conditions. That the City of Temecula City Council hereby approves
Planning Application No. PA95-0113 to delete condition of approval No. 21,22, and 23 for
Parcel Map 23969 on property known as Assessor's Parcel Nos. 940-310-044, 045,046,
047,048.
A. Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference and made
a part hereof.
Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution.
R:~STAI~RPT~II3PA95.CC I/2,~/96 ~ 5
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 13th day of February, 1996.
ATTEST:
Karel Lindemans, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 13th day of
February, 1996 by the following vote of the Commission:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
R:\STAFFRP~l13PA95.CC 1/25196 cdr 6
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
VICINITY MAP
R:~TAFFRPT~lI3PA95.CC 1/4/96 cclr 7
CITY OF TEMECULA ~
/
/
./
' PARC
CASE NO. - PA95-0113
CITY COUNCIL - JANUARY 9:1996
VICINITY MAP
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
R:~STAPPRPT~II3PA93.CC 1/4/96 odr '[ 0
CITY OF TEM ECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Parcel Map No. 23969
Commission Approval Date:
Expiration Date:
P1anninq Department
The subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of
Temecula, its agents. officers, and employees from any claim, action. or
proceeding against the City of Temecula or its agents, officers, or employees
to attack, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the City of Temecula, its
advisory agencies, appeal boards or legislative body concerning Tentative
Parcel Map No. 23969, which action is brought within the time period provided
for in California Government Code Section 66~99.37. The City of Temecula will
promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding
against the City of Temecula and will cooperate fully in the defense. If the
City fails to promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or
proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the subdivider shall not.
thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City of
Temecula.
The tentative parcel map shall conform to the requirements of Ordinance ~60,
Schedule E, unless modified by the conditions listed below. This approved
tentative parcel map will expire two years after the City Council approval date
unless extended as provided by Ordinance L~60.
The final map shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer or licensed land
surveyor subject to all the requirements of the State of California Subdivision
Map Act, Subdivision .Ordinance q60.
All road easements shall be offered for dedication to the public and shall
continue in force until the governing body accepts or abandons such offers.
All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the City
Engineer. Street names shall be subject to approval of the City Engineer.
Easements, when required for roadway slopes, drainage facilities, utilities,
etc., shall be shown on the final map if within the land division boundary. All
offers of dedication shail provide for nonexclusive public road and utility
access. All easements, offers of dedication and conveyances shall be
submitted and recorded as directed by the City Engineer.
Legal access as required by Ordinance 1~60 shall be provided from the parcel
map boundary to a City maintained road.
All delinquent property taxes shall be paid prior to recordation of the final
map.
Prior to any grading, a Grading Plan in compliance with the Uniform Building
Code shall be submitted to the City Department of Building and Safety.
STFRPT\PM23969. A I
The subdivider shall comply with the street improvement recommendations
outlined in the Office of Road Commissioner and County Surveyotis letter
dated April 2. 1990, a copy of which is attached. All items of the letter shall
comply except for No. 's 3 and 6.
10.
11.
12.
The subdivider shall comply with the environmental health recommendations
outlined in the County Health Department~s transmittal dated May 22, 1989, a
copy of which is attached.
The subdivider shall comply with' the flood control recommendations outlined
in the Riverside County Flood Control District's letter dated June 7, 1989, a
copy of which is attached. if the land division lies within an adopted flood
control drainage area pursuant to Section 10.25 of City of Temecula Land
Division Ordinance 460, appropriate fees for the construction of area drainage
facilities shall be collected by the City prior to recordation of the final map or
waiver of parcel map.
The subdivider shall comply with the fire improvement recommendations
outlined in the County Fire Department"s letter dated March 3, 1990, a copy
of which is attached.
The subdivider shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Building
and Safety Department: Land Use Section~s transmittal dated March 8, 1990,
a copy of which is attached.
15.
The subdivider shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Building
and Safety Department: Grading Section's transmittal dated July 14, 1989, a
copy of which is attached.
All proposed construction shall comply with the California Institute of
Technology, Palomar Observatory Outdoor Lighting Policy, as outlined in the
Southwest Area Plan.
16.
The subdivider shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Eastern
Municipal Water District transmittai dated May 16, 1989, a copy of which is
attached.
17.
The subdivider shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the
5outhem California Edison Company transmittal dated May 24, 1989, a copy
of which is attached.
18.
Prior to recordation of this map, a reciprocal access agreement shall be
recorded for Parcels 2 and 3.
19,
20.
Prior to recordation of this map, a signing and striping plan along with a
street improvement plan shall be approved by the City Engineer.
Prior to occupancy, developer shali pay any capital fee for road improvements
and public facilities imposed upon the property or project, including that for
traffic and public facility mitigation as required under the EIRINegative
Declaration for the project, in the amount in effect at the time of payment of
ST F R PT\ PM23969. A
2
21.
the fee. If an interim or final public facility mitigation fee or district has not
been finally established by the date on which developer requests its building
permits for the project or any phase thereof, the developer shall execute the
Agreement for Payment of Public Facility Fee, a copy of which has been
provided to developer. Developer understands that said Agreement may
require the payment of fees in excess of those now estimated (assuming
benefit to the project in the amount of such fees) and specifically waives its
right to protest such increase.
Prior to occupancy, Pujoi Street shall be improved with concrete curb and
gutter, (on the south side) located 16 feet from centerline with 32 feet of
asphalt concrete paving in accordance with Riverside County Standard 106,
Section "A" (32'/50).
22.
Dedication shall be made on Pujol Street to provide for a full 50 foot right-of-
way in accordance with Riverside County Standard 106, Section "A" 132'/50)
,.prior to final map.
23.
Prior to occupancy, a Riverside County Standard 810 barricade shall be
constructed at the west end of Pujol Street.
The applicant shall not be required to construct a sidewalk on Pujol Street
adjacent to Parcel Map No. 23969.
GRADING:
25.
26.
Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall comply with
Ordinance No. 663 by paying the fee required by that ordinance. Should
Ordinance No. 663 be superseded by the provisions of a Habitat Conservation
Plan prior to the payment of the fees required under the Habitat Conservation
Plan as implemented by City Ordinance or resolution.
Grading plans shall conform to the Hillside Development Standards as
presented in the Riverside County Comprehensive General Plan. All cut
and/or fill slopes, or individual combinations thereof, which exceed ten feet
in vertical height shall be modified by an appropriate combination of a special
terracing Ibenching) plan, increased slope ratio (e.g. 3:1), retain walls,
and/or slope planting combined with irrigation. All driveways shall not
~xceed a 1596 grade.
27.
Prior to the issuance of grading and/or building permits, all proposed new
structures on parcels shall be limited to slopes less than 26% unless otherwise
approved by the Planning Director.
28,
All grading and building plans/permits shall reflect the utilization of post and
beam foundations or the appropriate combination of split level pads and post
and beam foundations when development is proposed on slopes of 15% or
greater measured over a horizontal distance of 30 feet. All driveways shall
not exceed a 15% average grade.
ST F R PT\ PM23969. A 3
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS:
29.
Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall obtain clearance
and/or permits from the following agencies:
Road Department
Environmental Health
Riverside County Flood Control
Fire Department
Written evidence of compliance shall be presented to the Planning Department
of Building and Safety.
30.
Lots created by this subdivision shall be in conformance with the development
standards of the I-P zone.
31.
All lots created by this land division shall have a minimum area of 20,000
square feet.
32.
When lots are crossed by n~ajor public utility easements, each lot shall have a
net usable area of not less than 3,600 square feet, exclusive of the utility
easement.
33.
All lot length to width ratios shall be in conformance with Section 3.8C of
Ordinance ~60.
34.
Prior to recordation of the final map the land divider shall execute a certificate
of noncontiguous ownership.
35.
Concrete sidewalks shall be constructed in this subdivision in accordance with
the Standards No. I~00 and ~01, except that sidewalk shall not be required on
the south side of Pujol Street.
PRIOR TO THE RECORDATION OF THE FINAL MAP:
36.
Prior to the recordat/on of the Final Map, the following condition(s) shall be
complied with:
The subdivider shall annex Tentative Parcel Map No. 23969 into the City
of Temecula's Recreation and Parks District.
The subdivider shall submit to the Planning Director an agreement with
the City of Temecula Recreation and Parks District which demonstrates
to the satisfaction of the County that the land divider has provided for
the payment of parks and recreation fees in accordance with Section
10.35 of Ordinance No. ~60. The agreement shall be approved by the
Board of Supervisors prior to the recordat/on of the final map.
A copy of the Environmental Constraints Sheet (ECS) shall be
transmitted to the Planning. Department for review and approval.
STFRPT\PM23969. A 4
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINT SHEET CONDITIONS:
37.
An Environmental Constraints Sheet (ECS) shall be prepared with the final
map to delineate identified environmental concerns and shall be permanently
filed with th~ City. Prior to the recordation of the final map, a copy of the
ECS shall be transmitted to the Plannin9 Department for review and approval.
The approved ECS shall be forwarded with copies of the recorded final map to
the Planning Department and the Department of Building and Safety. The
following note(s) shall be placed on the Environmental Constraints Sheet.
"Surface alteration shall not be allowed in the delineated constraint area
without additional archaeological investigation or mitigation as directed
by the City of Temecula Planning Department.
"This property is located within thirty (30) miles of Mount Palomar
Observatory· Light and glare may adversely impact operations at the
Observatory. Outdoor lighting shall be from low pressure sodium lamps
that are oriented and shielded to prevent direct illumination above the
horizontal plane passing through the luminare."
Indicate the availability of domestic water services to the subject
property as of the date of recordation of the final map.
The following note shall be placed on the final map: "Constraints
affecting this property are shown on the accompanying Environmental
Constraints Sheet, the original of which is on file at the office of the
Riverside County Surveyor.
No building permits shall be issued by the City of Temecula for any
buiiding in Parce) Map No. 23969 until the developer or the developerrs
successors-in-interest or assignees, provides evidence of compliance
with the terms of said agreement for the financing of pubiic facilities.
STFRPT\PM23969. A 5
AND
Riverside County
Road Department
P.O. Box 1090
Riverside. CA
1213)
May 24. 1989
92502
Attn: Subdivision Section:
SUBJECT: Tentative Parcel Map No. 23'969
Please b~ advised that the division of the property shown on
Tentative Parcel Map No. 23969 will not unreasonably interfere
with the free and complete exercise of any easement(s) held by
~outhern California Edison Company within the boundaries of said
ntative parcel map.
This letter should not be construed as a subordination of the
Company's rights. title and interest in and to said easement(s).
nor should this letter be construed as a vaiver of any of the
provisions contained in said easement(s) or a waiver of costs for
relocation of any affected facilities.
In the event that the development requires teloration of facil-
ities. on the subject property. which facilities exist by right
of easement or otherwise. the owner/developer will be requested
to bear the cost of such teloration and provide Edison with
suitable replacement rights. Such costs and replacement rights
are required prior to the performance of the teloration.
If additional information is required in connection-with the
above mentioned subject. please call me at (213) 491-2644.
Very truly yours.
18455pmh
CC:
Riverside County Planning Dept.
Markham & Associates
ATTN: Patti Nahill
I
(I
March 8, 1990
Riverside County Planning Department
Attention= Jeff Adams
County, Administrative Center
4080 Lemon Street
Riverside. CA 92501
R! v ~RSIDE COUNTY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
RE: Parcel Map 23969, Amended Map No. I
Ladies and Gentlemen:
The Land Use Division of the Department of Building and Safety
has the following comments and conditions:
The developer shall obtain Planning Department approval for.
all on-site and off-site signage advertising the sale of
the parcel map pursuant to Section 19.5 of Ordinance 348.
Sincerely, "
Vaughn' SaWn
Land Use Technician
/sn
Administration gl 4) 682-8840 · ('71 4) 787-2020
OFFICa= .,,F ROAD COMMISSIONER & COUNTY ~LIRVEYOR
h'wl ~. Ternrant
ak-'TI~GIDADCOMMD~ONFa&COUNTYSUIVn~R
Riverside County Plm'ming C~mmisston
4080 Lemon Street
Riverside, CA 92501
Ladies and Gentlemen:
April 2, 1990
COUN17 ADMEN1STiIATIVE
MAII/NG ADDRESS:
IIVEILqDF, CALIRDiLNIA 91S02
PM 23969 - Amend #1
Schedule E - Team 5 S~D #9
AP #111-111-111-9
With respect uo the conditions of approval for
referenced tentative land division map, the Road Department
rec~-.~.ends that the landdivider provide the following street
improvements, street improvement plans and/or road dedications in
accordance with Ordinance 460 and Riverside County Road
Improvement Sta~Ha~is (Ordinance 461). It is understood that the
tentative map correctly shows acceptable centerline elevations,
all existing easements, traveled ways, and drainage courses with
appropriate Q's, and that their omission or tunacceptability may
require the map to be resutmitted for further consideration.
These Ordinances and the following conditions are essential pards
and a requirement occurring in ONE is as binding as though
occurring in all. They are intended to be complementary and
describe the conditions for a complete design of the improvement.
All questions regarding the true meaning of the conditions shell
be referred to the Road Coonnissioner's Office.
The landdivider shall protect downstream proper%ies from
damages caused by alteration of the drainage patterns,
i.e., concentration of diversion of flow. Protection
shall be provided by constructing adequate drainage
facilities including enlarging existing facilities and/
or by securing a drainage easenent. All drainage
easements shall be shown on the final map and noted as
follows: 'Drainage Easement - no building, obstructtons,
or encroachments by land fills are allowed'. The
protection shall be as approved by the Road Department.
e
The landdivider shall accept and properly dispose of all
offsite drainage flowing onto or through the site. In the
event the Road C~.~ssioner permits the use of streets for
drainage purposes, ' the provisions of Article XI of
Ora~nance No. 460 will apply. Should the quantities exceed
the street capacity or the use. of streets be prohibited for
drainage purposes, the subdivider shall provide adequate
drainage facilities as approved by the Road Department.
COUNTY
IN COOPERATION WITH THE
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY
AND FIRE PROTECTION ·
3-6-90 F~ & ~s
.40~0 ~emon ~ ~dte
R~e. CA 9250|
NAR 0 8 1990 787-6606
PARCEL MA~ 23969 - AMENDED
With respect to the conditions of approval for the above referenced land division,
the Fire Department reco=mends the followins fire protection measures be provided
in accordance with Riverside County Ordinances and/or recognized fire protection
standards:
FIRE PROTECTION
The water mains shall be capable of providing a potential fire flow of 5000 GPM
and an actual fire flow available from any one hydrant shall be 2500 GPM for
hours duration at 20 PSI residual operating pressure.
Approved super fire hydrants, (6"xA"x2-2{") shall be located at each street
intersection and spaced not more than 330 feet apart in any direction, with
~o portion of any lot frontage more than 165 feet'from a fire hydrant.
Applican=/developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to the
Fire Department for review. Plans shall conform to fire hydrant tTpes, location
and spacing, and, the system shall meet the fire flow requirements. Plans shall
be signed/approved by a registered civil engineer and =he local water company
with the following certification: "'I certify that the design of the water system
is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Riverside Count7 Fire
Dept."'
The required water system including fire hydrants shall be installed and accepted
by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building material being
placed on an individual lot.
All questions regarding the meaning of the.conditions shall be referred to the
Fire Department Planning and Engineering staff.
RAYMOND H. REGIS
Chief Fire Departmann Plan~er
By
Kurt Mattwell, Fire Safety Specialist
DEPAR'rMENT OF t~EALI'H
EIVERS I E COUNTY PLANNING DEPT. : tzi Nabill
.. runeheal Healnh Specialist IV
PARCEL HAP 23969 - SAN 53 Requirements
DATE: v, ay 22, 1989
The Environmental ilealth Services Division has reviewed tile tentative
map for this project and cannot make any recommendations until a
sanitation letter is filed. Time requirements for a SAN 51 letter are
as follows:
A satisfactory soils pcrcolntion test to prove tile'
project feasible.
A clc-',rance Icttcx' From tlsc npprol~rinte California
!{egional Water Control r$onrd.
3. Two cop~cs of tisc tentative map.
A "will-serve" letter from the agency/agencies
servinU parable water.
Should the project be served sunit:~r)' sewer service, this Department
would need only:
A "wi I 1-serve" letter From the nCency/aOencies serving
parable water and san'
xtar)' sewers.
2. One copy of the tentative map.
If the project is to be served water In' existin~ wells, pumps and
water tanks, a water supp_ly permit will lie required (contact the
Environmental Iicalth Services I)/visio.. l.:ngineering Sect)on at
787-6544). The requircmonts for a water supply permit are as follows:
Sati. srnctory ln!~orator)' tests [bncterjoloCica], aFRonit,
inorp. nnic. Re,cr:~l ph)-sic:~!. nntl Re,ernl minernl} to
prove the water parable. '. .
A complete set of plnns sham,drip, all details of the
proposed nnd existinl~ water systems: sizes and.types
o~r pipe nnd enactrelations slmwinl} that nd~qunte qunntity
and pressure ~n, be nm intn ined (Ca 1 ~ rornia Waterworks
Stnndards - Cali ro,-.l- Ilcnl th n,d Safety Code nnd
California Administrative Code, Title 22). These plans
must be signed by a registered civil engineer.
1lIB IIARKE"~ II'RI:CT
P. O. IOX 10~$
~HONw (714)
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND
WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
Riverside County
Planning Department
.County Administrative Center
Riverside, California 92501
Attention:
Regional Team No. 5
Patti Nahill
Ladies and Gentlemen:
Re: Parcel Map 23969
This is a proposal to divide 21.56 acres into 4 lots in the
Temecula area. The site is located at the end of Kathleen Way
south of Rancho California Road.
Parcels 3 and 4 are proposed to drain to the storm drain located
northeast of this site. Parcels 1 and 2 are proposed to drain
east of the site. Offsite flows are to be collected in the con-
crete ditch in the southern most corner of the site. These pro-
posals appear to be consistent with the approved Parcel Map
19626-2.
Following are the District's recommendations:
This parcel map is located within the limits of the Mur-
rieta Creek/Murrieta Valley Area Drainage Plan for which
drainage fees have 'been adopted by the Board. Drainage
fees shall be paid as set forth under the provisions of
the "Rules and Regulations for Administration of Area
Drainage Plans", amended February 16, 1988:
Drainage fees shall be paid to the Road .Commissioner
as part of the filing for record of the subdivision
final map or parcel map, or if the recording of a
final parcel map is waived, drainage fees shall be
paid as a condition of the waiver prior to recording
a certificate of compliance evidencing the waiver of
the parcel map; or
At the option of the land divider, upon filing a re-
quired affidavit requesting deferment of the payment
of fees, the drainage fees may be paid to the Build-
ing Director at the time of issuance of a grading
permit or building permit for each approved parcel,
whichever may be first obtained after the recording
of the subdivision final map or parcel map; provided
~Dwever, this option to defer the fees may not be
exercised for any parcel where grading or structures
have been initiated on the parcel within the prior 3
.year period, or permits for either activity have been
issued on that parcel which remain active·
Riverside County
Planning Department
Re: Parcel Map 2969
- 2 -
June 7, 1989
Onsite drainage facilities located outside of road right
of way should. be contained within drainage easements
shown on the final map. A note should be added to the
final map stating, 'Drainage easements shall be kept free
of buildings and obstructions'.
3. A drainage easement should be obtained from the affected
proper~y owners for the release of concentrated or di-
verted storm flows. A copy of the recorded drainage
easement should be submitted to the District for review
prior ~o the recordation of the final map.
4. A copy of the improvement plans, grading plans and final
map along with supporting hydrologic and hydraulic cal-
culations should be submitted to the District via the
Road Department for review and approval prior to recorda-
tion of the final map. Grading plans should be approved
prior ~o issuance of grading permits.
Questions concerning this matter may be referred to Zully Smith
of this office at 714/787-1253.
c: Markham and Associates
ry ~y yo :s
Civil Engineer
ZS:seb
NN_r'rH i_ E:DWARDS
lgg5 kmARKET STREET
P.O. IOX ¶033
TEI,Elmt-IONr (714) 78'7'2015
FAX NO. (714) '788-9965
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND
WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
RIVERSIDE:. ~.,ad, llrORNIA
Riverside County
P1 arming Department
County A~lministrative Center
Riverside, California
Attention: . Regional Team No. ~' P1 anner
Area:
R 4rHz: z ha./
We have reviewed this case and.have the following conwnents:
Except for nuisance nature local runoff which may traverse portions of the
property the project is considered free from ordinary storm flood hazard.
However, a storm of unusual magnitude could cause some damage. New construc-
tion should comply with all applicable ordinances.
The topography of the area consists of well defined ridges and natural water-
courses which traverse the property. There is adequate area outside of the
natural watercourses for building sites. The natural watercourses should be
kept free of buildings and obstructions in order' to maintain the natural
drainage patterns of the area and to prevent flood damage to new buildings.
A note should be placed on an environmental constraint sheet stating, "All new
buildings shall be floodproofed by elevating the finished floors a minimum of
1B inches above adjacent ground surface. Erosion protection shall be provided
for mobile home supports."
drainage plan fees shall be paid in accordance with the applicable rules and
regulations.
The proposed zoning is consistent with existing flood hazards. Some flood
control facilities or floodproofing may be required to fully develop to the
implied density.
The District's report dated
is still current for this project.
The District does not object to the proposed minor change.
.~,/" This project is a part of
free of ordinary storm flood hazard when improvements
accordance with approved plans.
The project will be
~ave been constructed in
The attached con~ents apply.
V ry
,.OHN H. KASHUBA
· Civil Engineer
DATE: 14./,,,(0{ t ~ ct C)
#25/R/eg/S
Eastern Municipal ' V'at'er Di:;trict
Juanixa L Hachek
Riverside Co. Planning Dept.
4080 Lemon St., 9th Floor
Riverside, Ca 92501
SUBJECT: r~/lY?-=-;- ~-- I~'1 ~ 2 ~ c:L Co c~ _
The District is responding to your request for connents on the subject project
relative to water and/or sewer service. The items checked below apply to this
project review.
The subject project:
/'Is not within EMWD's:
/water service area
sewer service area
/Will be required to construct/provide the following facilities if to
be served byEffi~D:
Sewer Service
Any and all necessary regionally sized onstte and offsite gravity sewers and
appurtenant works that might include monitoring manholes, lift stations, force
mains, and effluent disposal/use. Sewers will not be allowed along lot
lines/private land. Fee payment and participation in regional sewers, treatment,
and effluent disposal must be met. Only wastes acceptable to EFfaq) regulations
will be allowed.
EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT
Planning Department
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
Department of Building and
'rD: PLANt,,II.",,Ie" D TE=
FROM:
,
,~'__Please make the fOllOwing a condition of approval:
~_a. P~io~ to commencing any grading exceeding 5~ cubic
,~ B~ the o~ner o~ that p~Qpe~ty shall obtain a g~a~ing
' from the Department Of Building and Safety
yards.
permit
Prior to approval of this use/subdivision a grading permit
and approval of the rough grading shall be obtained from
the Building and Safety Department.
P~ior to issuance of any building permit, the property
owner shall obtain a grading permit and approval to
construct from the Building and Safety Department.
Constructing a road, where greate~ than 50 cubic yards
material is placed or moved, requires a grading permit.
Prior to occupancy and/or beginning actual use of this
permit, a grading permit and approval of the grading shal;
be o~tained from the Building and Safety Department.
Provide verification that the existing graBing was
permitted and approval to construct was obtained from the
Building and Safety.
___g. The G~ading Section has no comment on this site.
NOTE:
For the final grading plan - Please provide the applicable
information from County Grading Forms
~8~-~1
ES~-12~
2B~-13~
Rev. 3/89
~ R..
C~dNTY OF RIVERSIDE
Department of Building and Safety
ease refer to the following comments when
~an for plan review by the Grading Section.
X. 1.
5
X 12,.
.,~..14,
15.
.6.
19.
submitting a grading
Please refe~ to department forms 284-86,284-120,284-.21
and 24-46 for applicable information to include on your
grading plans.
In order to issue a ~rading permit, the following items
will be needed-at the plan review stage.
X a. Obtain a plan review permit.
X b. Provide 2 copies of the Preliminary Soils
Report.
Xc. Provide a copy of the hydrologic-hydraulic
study.
d. Provide clearance
departments.
Submit 5
review.
letters from the following
Planning
Flood Control
Road Department
Other F/~E
Provide a set of the Planning Department
conditions of approval on the approved case.
Provide an erosion control plan, prepared by
a licensed landscape architect, for plan
review, permit, and bonding.
copies of the grading plan for distribution and
Refer to any specific plan related to this project.
This property is located in the Rancho California
Potential Subsidence area. Per Board Resolution 88-61,
additional geotechnical information is required.
Observe slope setbacks from permit areas and structures
per section 7011 and figure 29-1 of the Uniform Building
Code as modified by Ordinance 457.
Driveway grades shall be 15% or less. =
Show-street and pad elevations~ -Insure that a 1% grade
(min~ can be'maintained from back of pad to street·
Design V-ditches at top of slopes to handle the Q-100
year storm flow.
Provide recorded drainage easements for the proposed lot
to lot drainage.
Show the Q-100 year storm flows at the inlet and outlet
of all drainage fa'cilities.
Provide building footprint on all lots.
Design each lot to drain separately.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit, projects having
an imbalance between cut and fill shall specify the
location of their impor~ or expor~ source.
Show all slopes to scale, including terrace and setbacks.
Proposed off-site grading will require written notarized
permission from the affected property owner.
/No obstruction or diversion of natural water courses
shall be permitted.
Provide sufficient offsite topography to show this
projects compatibility with adjacent proper%los.
verify any underlvin~ ~radinu was permitted and aDDroved
ATTACHMENT NO. 4
MINUTES FROM THE AUGUST 20, 1990
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
R:\STAFFRPTXlI31~Ag$.CC 114196 c, dr 11
L2mJCNING COMMISSION MINUTES AUGUST 20, 1990
mm~ssioner Ford moved to close the public hearing
se nded by Commissioner Fahey and carried unanimous .
,- f
Commis 'oner Hoagland moved to reject staff's
recommen rion and not adopt the Nqgative D aration
for Plot n Nos. 5 and 6 and deny Plot an Nos. 5
ia s
to ensure ade~ screening
of the roof equi , study t g and to
re-evaluate the tion of truck loading
doors. Commissi amended his motion
by continuing the pub g on Item 4 and Item 5
to the Planning Comm n meeting of September 17,
1990. Commissionem zeconded the motion.
AYES: COMMI FERS:
Blair, FaheV,
Ford, Hoagland,
Chi ni aef f
: 0 COMM None
~-Recess
Chai
P.M
Dennis Chiniaeff declared a five minute
o allow planning staff to set up more exhibits
The meeting was reconvened at 7:55 P.M.
=ess at 7:50
agenda
Tentative Parcel Map 2-3969
6.]
Deborah Parks presented staff's report on the subdivision
of Parcel 22 of Parcel Map 18254 into four parcels.
Ms. Parks stated that when the parcel map was approved
by the County, they failed to show Pujol Street. County
Ordinance 460 required the dedication of Pujol Street;
at that time, however, is was overlooked and the width
of Pujol Street remained at 40 feet. When Ohmdahl
Enterprises applied to sub-divide, they were told by
the County they would need the dedication of 20 feet
of Parcel 2 for dedication of Pujol Street. Ohmdahl
Enterprises had reached an agreement with Eastern
Municipal Water District to provide an easement within
this 20 feet. To widen Pujol Street would be a great
· expense and at this time staff is unclear as to who
would be responsible for the cost of these improvements.
wxN .8/2o/9o -e- s/23/N
PI.ANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
AUGUST 20, 1990
3ohn Middleton stated that the Engineering DeDartment's
recommendation was to construct Pujol Street as per
county seandards.
Anthony Polo, Markham & Associates..41750 Winchester Road,
Temecula, qave a brief description of the project.
William Haley, 28426 Pujol Street, Temecula, an
adjacent property owner expressed his desire to have
the developer proceed with the road improvements to Pujol
Street as proposed by the County of Riverside.
Anthony Polo offered an alternative to the Commission
of leaving Pujol Street in its' present state and
provide the dedication and improvements to create a
cu]-de-sac on the end of Sixth Street.
Doug Stewart, deputy traffic engineer, advised the
Commission that the easement was neither Mr. Ohmdah]'s
property nor Mr. Maley's property. He stated that
County Ordinance Mo.460 and the recommendation by the
Riverside County Transportation Department requires
certain improvements be completed; however, there is
an exception clause within the ordinance that would
allow the Commission to deviate from these regu~red
street improvements, but only under that exception
clause could the Commission consider anything other
than what was recommended by the county.
Commissioner Fahey questioned the reference to special
circumstances of the exception applicable to the
properties size, shape or topagraphy, and did that
exception apply to such conditions created by the
property owner.
Doug Stewart stated that the ordinance reauires that
the applicant put in a street: however. it would be at
a substantial cost to the applicant, and since applicant
has offered other alternatives that seem more appropriate,
the commission could consider one of these alternatives
and make that reco.a.endation to the Cit~ Council.
Commissioner Chiniaeff asked if staff needed action by
the Commission to come back with a partial recox~,.endation.
az~ .8120190 -1- 8/23190
PLANNING CONMISSION ~IJUTES
&UGUST 20, 1990
john Cavanaugh advised the Co...ission that if they were
to approve this parcel map and recolmi~',end there be a
partial aedication or recommend that part of the
dedication be accomplished by another property owner
other than the applicant, the Commission needs to be
aware that if the other property owner does not approve
of the recon~endation, and if that 'approval is not
sought within 120 days after the Commission's
recommendation. this condition will automatically
terminate.
Commissioner Ford asked if this was a condition for
outside improvements, could the Commission request the
applicant to bond or guarantee the acquisition rights
of the property.
John Cavanaugh stated that the Co,,i','dssion cou]d either
recommend that the applicant provide the dedication of his
own property or recommend partial dedication/vacation of
the other property owner. If the other property owner
does not approve 120 days after the Con~nission acts on it,
this condition is automatically terminated.
Commissioner Fahey moved to not adopt the Negative
Declaration for Parcel Map No. 23969, and to continue
the item to September 17, 1990, with staff working with
both parties to come to an agreement acceptable.
Commissioner Ford seconded the motion.
AYES: 5"
CONNISSIONERS:
Blair, Fahey,
Ford, Hoagland,
Chiniaeff
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
7.' FIst PI-~ 11621
KIll. 8/20190
-8- 8/23/90
ATTACHMENT NO. 5
MINUTES FROM THE SEPTEMBER 17, 1990
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
R:\STAFFRPT~I13PA95.CC 1/4l~ cdr I 2
PrnDn~a.I to' suD~lvide Parcel 22 of Parcel MaD ]8954,
Located at RidQe Park Drive, South of Rancho California
Rnad,,~nto four parcels. The Commission continued this
item from the meetinQ of AuQust 20, 1990, and directed
staff to work with t'he applicant and the adjacent property
owner on a solution to the access problem.
DEBORAH PARKS prov~deO the staff report on this item. She
stated that staff arranged a meeting however, Mr. Haley
d~d not attend that meetjnQ but was advised of the
resutts.
JOHN MIDDI.ETON stated that in speaking with the
Riverside County Fire Department regarding the proposed
improvements of Pujo] Street. They confirmed that the
aop[icant could build Pujo[ Street according to 32'/50'
stacCatOs and that a turn-around at the end of the col-de-
sac would not be necessary at this time since the street
onJv provides access to one dwelling uni~. He stated that
the Engineering Department recon~nendation would be to
construct an offset col-de-sac when Mr. Haley develops
his property.
ANTHONY POLO, Markham & Associates, 41750 Winchester
Road, Temecula, asked for clarification of Condition
No. 29, requesting pu~tic facility financing. GARY
THORNHILL stated that Condition No. 29 did not pertain
to this item and should be deleted.
WILLIAM HALEY, 28426 Pujol Street. Temecula, adjacent
Dropert~ owner. expressed h:s OppOSition to the
reco~=nendation by the Engineering Department.
MIN. 9/17/90 -6- 9/21/90
Rnao Oena~tment dl.~ not condition him to build the
cu~ ~-sac, add t~at the cu]-de-sac would be o~ no benefit
to ~ls Drooertv: h~wever, he has o~ered to put ~n the
curb ~nd .~utter and 3P' o~ street improvements to expedite
the approvaL.
COMMISSIONER FORD clarified that Mr. Omdahl was Drovidina
approximately 80% of the street improvements and these
.improvements woula be of no benefit to his property. He
su~aested that Mr. Ha[ey might want to vacate the property
~n the future.
COMMISSIONER FAHEY moved to close the public hearing,
seconded by COMMISSIONER HOAGLAND and carried unanimously,
AYES: 5
COMMISSIONERS:
Blair0 Fahey,
For~, Hoagland,
Chinjaeff
NOES: 0
COMMISSIONERS: None
COMMISSIONER FAHEY moved to adopt the Negative Declaration
for Parcel MaD No. 23969 and approve Parcel MaD No. 23969,
based on the analysis and findings in the Staff Report and
subject to the Conditions of Approval- modified by the
deletion of Condition No. 29, seconded by COMMISSIONER
HOAGLAND and carried by the followin~ vote.
AYES: 4
COMMISSIONERS:
Fahey, Ford,
Hoaqland,
Chiniaeff
NOES: i COMMISSIONERS: Blair
ARc .n 2 5 6 3 3
PLOT PLAN NO. 11669:--.=-. .............
5.1 Proposal to subdi~ide-'=~:2'='~eS"intD, four parcels and
~ve~ r a ~ark the we~t"-side o~ Business
Park Drive, north
MIN. 9/17/90 -7- 9/21/90
ATTACHMENT NO. 6
MINUTES FROM THE SEPTEMBER 25, 1990
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
R:\STAFIqtFf%II3PAg~.CC 114196 exit 13
City Cou~L~ Minutes
September 25, 1990
11.
10-A Permit - S hen's Kangaroo Rat .
11.1 Authorize e Mayor to execute Federal Fi 'and Wildlife
License/Perm pplication for incidental
11.2 Authorize the May to execut - i~st Amendment to Agency
Agreement California E n ed Species Permit.
The motion was carried by the. f :
AYES: 5 COU Lindemans, . Moore,
· ks
8. Parcel Map No. 23969
Councilmember Moore referred to Planning Condition No. 23, asking that the
"Standard 810 barricade" be changed to something more aesthetic.
Doug Stewart, Deputy City Engineer, stated this is a temporary barricade and
will be removed when adjoining properties are developed.
Councilmember Mu~oz asked for a brief report from staff outlining the major
issues in this case.
Gary Thornhill, Chief Planner, explained the significant issue discussed before
the Planning Commission was the design of the road where the barricade is
proposed. He stated the sewer agency installed lines in the road right-of-way,
which caused a re-design of the road.
Doug Stewart, Deputy City Engineer, presented slides showing the right-of-way
and the 10 foot strip the applicant has agreed to construct.
Minutes\9\2S\90 -3- 11/28/95
City Council Minutes
September 25.1990
Councilmember Moore moved, Councilmember Birdsall seconded a motion to
receive and file Parcel Map No. 23969.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
Birdsall, Lindemans,
Mu~oz, Parks
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Moore,
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Conditional Use Permit No. 2980. Revised Permit No. I
Jncilmember Mu~oz asked if this two-lane street can
ic proposed by this project?
potential
Dou 9wart stated that it is his understanding that
which a ressed these issues,
study was done
Gary ;aid this project is a very low of traffic. It is a storage
facility, and receive mostly night ar d access, and therefore is
not a concern to lff.
Mayor Parks asked if e are an' for a traffic signal at this intersection.
He stated he shares ,r Mu~oz' concern regarding the traffic in this
area and asked the Enginee~ Department to look into a possible exit off of
Lyndie Lane from the Car tnd shopping center.
.
The motion .w s carried by the following vot
AYES' 5 COUNCILMEMBERS' Birds I Lindemans Moore
N S: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Minutes\9\25\90 -4- 11/28/95
ITEM 28
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY ATI'ORNEvA~~~
DIRECTOR OF FI A
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Gary Thornhill, Community Development Director
February 13, 1996
Planning Application No. PA95-0133, Zoning Amendment and Planning
Application No. PA95-0134, General Plan Amendment
Prepared By: Craig D. Ruiz, Assistant Planner
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council:
1. Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 96-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. PA95-0134,CHANGING THE GENERAL PLAN
LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL
TO SERVICE COMMERCIAL ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE
EASTERLY SIDE OF YNEZ ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 270 FEET
NORTH OF SOLANA WAY AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S
PARCEL NO. 921-680-007
Read by title only and introduce ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 96-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA95-
0133, ZONING AMENDMENT~ CHANGING THE ZONING
DESIGNATION FROM COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL TO SERVICE
COMMERCIAL ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE EASTERLY
SIDE OF YNEZ ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 270 FEET NORTHERLY
OF SOLANA WAY AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'$ PARCEL NO.
921-680-007
Adopt the Negative Declaration for Planning Application No. PA95-0133,Zoning
Amendment and Planning Application No. PA95-0134, General Plan
Amendment
R:\STAP'FRF~I33PA96.CC 2/5196 kJb 1
BACKGROUND
The purpose of the requests are to allow for the expansion of the adjacent Nissan dealership
onto the subject site. The proposal to expand the Nissan dealership to this site is inconsistent
Wlith the existing Community Commercial General Plan Land Use and Draft Zoning
El signations. Specifically, automobile dealership are prohibited in the Community
C~ommercial Designation. Thus, should the Council not adopt the General Plan Amendment
and Zoning Amendment, the proposal to expand will not be permitted.
The proposed site is located on one of two vacant parcels within a commercial shopping
center. The center contains retail shops and a restaurant to the east and a vacant parcel of
land to the south of the subject site. Car dealerships are located to the north and west of the
site. On January 8, 1996, the Planning Commission found that the proposals would be
compatible with the surrounding automobile dealership and retail uses. Thus, the Commission
recommended that the City Council approve the above referenced amendments.
FISCAL IMPACT
None.
Attachments:
City Council Resolution No. 96- - Page 3
City Council Ordinance No. 96- - Page 7
January 8, 1996 Planning Commission Staff Report - Page 11
R:\STAFFRF~I33PA96.CC 215196 kJb 2
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
RESOLUTION NO. 96-
R:XSTAFFRPT~I33PA96.CC 2/5/96 klb ~
ATTACItlVIENT NO. 1
RF_~OLUTION NO. 96--
A RESOLUTION OF ~ CITY COUNCIL OF TIFF. CITY
OF TEMECULA RECO~ING APPROVAL OF
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA95-0134, CHANGING
THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION PROM
COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL TO SERVICE
COMMERCIAL ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE
EASTERLY SIDE OF YNEZ ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 270
FEET NORTH OF SOLANA WAY AND KNOWN AS
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 921-680-007
WI:fEREAS, Tetraton Corporation fried Planning Application No. PA95-0134 in
accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Riverside County Land Use and
Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference;
WtIEREAS, Planning Application No. PA95-0134 was processed in the time and manner
prescribed by State and local law;
W!~REAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. PA95-0134
on January 8, 1996, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time
interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or in opposition;
WttEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and
arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, the Commission considered all facts
relating to Planning Application No. PA95-0134;
WtIEREAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing pertaining to Planning
Application No. PA95-0134 on February 13, 1996, at which time interested persons had
opportunity to testify either in support or opposition to Planning Application No. PA95-0134;
WtIEREAS, the City Council received a copy of the Commission proceedings and Staff
Report regarding Planning Application No. PA95-0134;
NOW, T!~EREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THY~ CITY OF
TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETFMMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. FindinEs.
A. The City Council in approving the proposed General Plan Amendment, makes the
following findings, to wit:
1. The proposal is consistent with all applicable sections of the General Plan.
R:\STAFFRPT'd33PA96.CC 2/5/96 klb 4
2. The pwposal is compatible with surrounding land uses which are existing
and future commercial developments.
3. Mitigation measures in contained within the Mitigation Monitoring
Program will reduce the impacts of the proposal below a level of significance.
4. The site of the proposal is suitable to accommodate the land uses permitted
in the Draft Development Code due to the fact that the development standards as proposed
within the Draft Development Code and the mitigation measures within the Negative Declaration
ensure orderly development of the site.
5. Said findings axe supported by analysis, maps, exhibits, and environmental
documents associated with this application and herein incorporated by reference.
B. As conditioned pursuant to Section 4, Planning Application No. PA95-0134, as
proposed, is compatible with the health, safety and weftare of the community.
Section 2. Environmental Compliance. Pursuant to the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA), an Initial Study has been prepared for this proposal. The Initial Study
determined that although the proposal could have a significant effect on the environment, these
effects are not considered to be significant due to mitigation measures contained in the project
design and the Mitigation Monitoring Program. These will mitigate any potentially significant
impacts to a level of insignificance; therefore staff recommends that the Planning Commission
recommend that the City Council adopt a Negative Declaration for the proposal.
Section 3. Conditions. That the City of Temecuh City Council hereby approves
Planning Application No. PA95-0134 to change the General Phn Land Use Designation on
approximately .67 acres of land fwm Community Commercial to Service Commercial on
pwperty located on the easterly side of Ynez Road, approximately 270 feet northerly of the
intersection of Ynez Road and Solana Way and known as Assessor's Parcel No. 921-680-007.
R:\ST~133PA96.CC 2'6/96
Section 4. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 13th day of February, 1996.
KAI~RT- F. LI2q'D~S
MAYOR
I FrEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 13th day of
February, 1996 by the following vote of the Council:
COU'N~ERS:
NOES:
CO~CILMEMBERS:
COUNCK2VIEMBERS:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
R:~STAFFRPT~I33PA96.CC 2/5/96 klb 6
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
ORDINANCE NO. 96-
R:~'TA~I33PAg~.CC 2/$196 klb
7
ATTACffi~NT NO. 2
ORDINANCE NO. 96-
AN ORDINANCE OF ~ CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY
OF TIi~ECULA APPROVING PIANNING APPLICATION
NO. PA95-0L33, ZONING A1V~-~~, CHANGING ~
ZONING DESIGNATION FROM COMMUNITY
CO1VIM~-RC~ TO SERVICE CO1VIMERCIAL ON
PROPERTY LOCATED ON Tit'F, EASTERLY SIDE OF
YNET. ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 270 FEET NORT!tERLY
OF SOLANA WAY AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL
NO. 921-680-007
WItF~, Terraton Corporation ~ed Planning Application No. PA95-0133 in
accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Riverside County Land Use and
Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference;
WltEREAS, Planning Application No. PA95-0133 was processed in the time and manner
prescribed by State and local law;
WttEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. PA95-0133
on January 8, 1996, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time
interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or in opposition;
WB'EREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and
arguments, ff any, of all persons desiring to be heard, the Commission considered all facts
relating to Planning Application No. PA95-0133;
WItEREAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing pertaining to Planning
Application No. PA95-0133 on February 13, 1996, at which time interested persons had
opportunity to testify either in support or opposition to Planning Application No. PA95-0133;
WHEREAS, the City Council received a copy of the Commission proceedings and Staff
Report regarding Planning Application No. PA95-0133;
NOW, T!~-REFORE, ~ CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY OF TEMECULA
DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Findines.
A. The City Council in approving the proposed Change of zone, makes the following
findings, to wit:
1. The proposal is consistent with all applicable sections of the General Plan.
R:~STAFFRPT~I33PA96.CC 216196 lab 8
2. The proposal is compatible with surrounding land uses which are existing
and future commercial developments.
3. Mitigation measures in contained within the Mitigation Monitoring
Program will reduce the impacts of the proposal below a level of significance.
4. The site of the proposal is suitable to accommodate the land uses permitted
in the Draft Development Code due to the fact that the development standards as proposed
within the Draf~ Development Code and the mitigation measures within the Negative Declaration
ensure orderly development of the site.
5. Said findings axe supported by analysis, maps, exhibits, and environmental
documents associated with this application and herein incorporated by reference.
B. As conditioned pursuant to Section 4, Planning Application No. PA95-0133, as
proposed, is compatible with the health~ safety and welfare of the community.
Section 2. Environmental Compliance. Pursuant to the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA), an Initial Study has been prepared for this proposal. The Initial Study
determined that although the proposal could have a .significant effect on the environment, these
effects are not considered to be significant due to mitigation measures contained in the project
design and the Mitigation Monitoring Program. These will mitigate any potentially significant
impacts to a level of insignificance; therefore staff recommends that the Planning Commission
recommend that the City Council adopt a Negative Declaration for the proposal.
Section 3. Conditions. That the City of Temecula City Council hereby approves
Planning Application No. PA95-0133 to change the zoning on approximately .67 acres of land
from Community Commercial to Service Commercial on property located on the easterly side
of Ynez Road, approximately 270 feet northerly of the intersection of Ynez Road and Solana
Way and known as Assessor's Parcel No. 921-680-007.
Section 4. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its
passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. The City Clerk shall
publish a summary of this Ordinance and a certified copy of the full text of this Ordinance shall
be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five days prior to the adoption of this
Ordinance. Within 15 days from adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall publish a
summary of this Ordinance, together with the names of the Councilmembers voting for and
against the Ordinance, and post the same in the office of the City Clerk.
R:~STAFFRPT~133PA96.CC 2/6196/Lib 9
Section 5. PASSI~.n, AlPROVED AND ADOPIT_J)this 13th day of February, 1996.
Karel F. Lindemans, Mayor
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CAII!:~ORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that
the foregoing Ordinance No. 9 - was duly introduced and phced upon its first reading at
a regular meeting of the City Council on the 13th day of February, 1996, and that thereafter,
said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City
of Temecula on the __ day of , by the following roll call vote:
COUNCILMEMBERS
NOES:
COUNCII/VIEMBERS
COUNC]I1VIEMBERS
June S. Greek, City Clerk
R:\STAFFRPT~133PA96.CC 2/5196 k~ '[ 0
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
JANUARY 8, 1996 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
R:\STA, FI~-.F~i33]~A96.CC 2/5196 IrJb 11
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
January 8, 1996
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
Planning Application No. PA95-0133, Zoning Amendment.
Planning Application No. PA95-0134, General Plan Amendment
Prepared By: Craig D. Ruiz, Assistant Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Department Staff recommends the Planning
Commission:
RECOMMEND Adoption of the Negative Declaration for
Planning Application No. PA95-0133,Zoning Amendment
and Planning Application No. PA95-0134, General Plan
Amendment; and
ADOPT Resolution No. 96- recommending approval of
PA95-0133, based upon the Analysis and Findings
contained in the Staff Report; and
ADOPT Resolution No. 96- recommending approval of
PA95-0134, based upon the Analysis and Findings
contained in the Staff Report; and
APPLICATION INFORMATION
RECOMMEND Approval of Planning Application No. PA95-
0133, Zoning Amendment and Planning Applica.tion No.
PA95-0134, General Plan Amendment and subject to the
attached Conditions of Approval.
APPLICANT:
Terraton Corporation/Nissan of Temecula
REPRESENTATIVE:
Larry Markham, Markham & Associates
PROPOSAL:
General Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment for a
.67 acre parcel to change the existing land use and zoning
designation from Community Commercial to Service
Commercial
LOCATION:
The easterly side of Ynez Road, approximately 270 feet
northerly of Solana Way
EXISTING ZONING:
C 1/CP (General Commercial)
PROPOSED ZONING:
SC (Service Commercial)
R:\STAFFRPT~.I33PA95.PC 1/4/96 klb 1
SURROUNDING ZONING:
North: C1/CP
South: C1/CP
East: C1/CP
West: CPS
(General Commercial)
(General Commercial)
(General Commercial)
(Highway Tourist
Commercial)
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Community Commercial
PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN
DESIGNATION:
Service Commercial
EXISTING LAND USE:
Vacant
SURROUNDING LAND USES:
North:
South:
East:
West:
Car Dealership
Vacant
Commercial Shopping Center
Car Dealership
BACKGROUND
Planning Application No. PA95-0133 and Planning Application No. PA95-0134 were formally
submitted to the Planning Department on December 14, 1995. A Development Review
Committee (DRC) meeting was held on January 4, 1996. Planning Application No. PA95-
0133 and Planning Application No. PA95-0134 were deemed complete on January 4. 1996.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposal is for a General Plan Amendment to change the existing Land Use Designation
from Community Commercial to Service Commercial and a Zoning Amendment to change the
proposed Zoning Designation from Community Commercial to Service Commercial.
ANALYSIS
The proposed site is located on one of two vacant parcels within a commercial shopping
center. The center contains retail shops and a restaurant to the east and a vacant parcel of
land to the south of the subject site. Car dealerships are located to the north and west of the
site. The Planning Department has received applications on both vacant parcels. The
southerly parcel has a proposal for a gas station/mini-market/car wash and on the subject site
is a proposal to expand the adjacent Nissan dealership to this site (the expansion request is
a separate application and is not before the Commission).
The proposal to expand the Nissan dealership to this site is inconsistent with the General Plan
and Draft Development Code. The Community Commercial Draft Zoning and Land
Designations prohibit automobile dealership uses. The Draft Zoning and Land Designations
do permit gas stations. Thus, should the Planning Commission or the City Council ultimately
not adopt the General Plan Amendment (GPA) and Zoning Amendment (ZA), the proposal to
expand the dealership cannot be approved. It is the opinion of staff that the GPA and ZA, and
ultimately the automobile dealership, would be compatible with the surrounding dealership and
retail uses.
R:\STAFFRFT~I33PA95.PC 1/3/96 Idb 2
EXISTING ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION
The existing General Plan Land Use Designation and the proposed Zoning Designation are
Community Commercial. The proposal will change the designations to Service Commercial
.~o facilitate the proposed automobile dealership expansion. The Draft Zoning Code
~onditionally permits automobile dealerships in the Service Commercial Zone. Therefore, a
~onditional Use Permit will be required to be approved before the dealership can expand.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION'
Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), an Initial Study has been
prepared for this proposal. The Initial Study determined that although the proposal could have
a significant effect on the environment, these effects are not considered to be significant due
to mitigation measures contained in the project design and Mitigation Monitoring Program.
These will mitigate any potentially significant impacts to a level of insignificance; therefore
staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council adopt a
Negative Declaration for the proposal.
SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS
The site of the proposal is located in an area with numerous auto-related and retail business.
Vacant land in the area is anticipated to include more of the same. Thus, it is staff's opinion
that the approval of the GPA and ZA to facilitate. the automobile dealership expansion will be
consistent with the existing and anticipated land uses in the area. Thus, staff recommends
that the Commission recommend approval to the City Council.
FINDINGS
1. The proposal is consistent with all applicable sections of the General Plan.
The proposal is compatible with surrounding land uses which are existing and future
commercial developments.
Mitigation measures contained within the Mitigation Monitoring Program will reduce the
impacts of the proposal below a level of significance.
The site of the proposal is suitable to accommodate the land uses permitted in the
Draft Development Code due to the fact that the development standards as proposed
within the Draft Development Code and the mitigation measures within the Negative
Declaration ensure orderly development of the site.
Said findings are supported by analysis, maps, exhibits, and environmental documents
associated with this application and herein incorporated by reference.
R:\STAFFRixI~133PA95.PC 1/3/96 klb 3
Attachments:
2.
3.
4.
PC Resolution - Blue Page 5
PC Resolution - Blue Page 9
Initial Study - Blue Page 13
Exhibits - Blue Page 38
A, Vicinity Map
B. Zoning Map
C, General Plan Map
R:~TAFFRPT~I33PA95.PC 1/3/96 kib 4
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
RESOLUTION NO. 96-
R:\STAFFRPT~I33PA95.PC I/3/96
ATTACHMENT NO. '1
I~ESOLUTION NO. 9~--
A RESOLUTION OF TFW. PLANNING COMMISSION OF
~ CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMI~.NDING APPROVAL
OF PLANNING APPLICATION NO, PA9~-0133, CHANGING
~ ZONING DESIGNATION FROM COMMUNITY
COMM'F, RC~ TO SERVICE COMMF~RCIAL ON
PROPERTY LOCATED ON TH'E EASTERLY SIDE OF
YNEZ ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 270 FEET NORTHERLY
OF SOLANA WAY AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL
NO. 921-680-007
WltF. RFAS, Terraton Corporation fried Planning Application No. PA95-0133 in
accordance with the City of Temecuh General Plan and Riverside County Land Use and
Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference;
WltEREAS, Planning Application No. PA95-0133 was processed in the lime and manner
prescribed by State and local law;
WItF. RF. AS , the Planning Commission considereA Planning Application No. PA95-0133
on January 8, 1996, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time
interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or in opposition;
~, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and
arguments, ff any, of all persons desiring to be heard, the Commission considered all facts
relating to Planning Application No. PA95-0133;
NOW, THEREFORE, ~ PLANNING COMMISSION OF ~ CITY OF
TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
Section 2. Findings.
A. The Planning Commission in recommending approval of Planning Application No.
PA95-0133, makes the following findings, to wit:
1. The proposal is consistent with all applicable sections of the General Plan.
2. The proposal is compatible with surrounding land uses which are existing
and future commercial developments.
R:\STAFFRFr~I33PA95.PC 113/96 klb 6
3. Mitigation measures in containext within the Mitigation Monitoring
Program will reduce the impacts of the proposal below a level of significance.
4. The site of the proposal is suitable to accommodate the land uses permitted
in the Draft Development Code due to the fact that the development standards as proposed
within the Draft Development Code and the mitigation measures within the Negative Declaration
ensure orde~y development of the site.
5. Said findings are supported by analysis, maps, exhibits, and environmental
documents associated with this application and herein incorporated by reference.
B. As conditioned pursuant to Section 4, Planning Application No. PA95-0133, as
proposed, is compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community.
Section 3. Environmental Compliance. Pursuant to the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA), an Initial Study has been prepared for this proposal. The Initial Study
determined that although the proposal could have a significant effect on the environment, these
effects are not considered to be significant due to mitigation measures contained in the project
design and the Mitigation Monitoring Program. These will mitigate any potentially significant
impacts to a level of insignificance; therefore staff recommends that the Planning Commission
recommend that the City Council adopt a Negative Declaration for the proposal.
Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby
recommends approval of Planning Application No. PA95-0133 to change the zoning on
approximately .67 acres of land from Community Commercial to Service Commercial on
property located on the easterly side of Ynez Road, approximately 270 feet northerly of the
intersection of Ynez Road and Solana Way and known as Assessor's Parcel No. 921-680-007.
R:\STAFFRPT',I33PA95.PC 1/3/96 klb 7
Section 5. PASSFJ~, APPROV';.I~ AND ADOPTED this 8th day of January, 1996.
STEVEN I. FORD
CH.MRMAN
I WEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 8th day of
January, 1996 by the following vote of the Commission:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
DEBBIE UBNOSKE
SECRETLY
R:\STAFFRFBla3PA95.1K; 1~/96 lab 8
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
RESOLUTION NO. 96-
R:\STAF'FRFI",133PA95.PC 1/3/96 Idb 9
ATrACI-IM~NT NO. 2
RESOLUTION NO. 9~-
A RESOLUTION OF TIFF. PLANNING COMMIqSION OF
TIFF. CITY OF TENIECULA RECOMMENDING APPROVAL
OF PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA95-0134, CHANGING
THF. GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM
COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL TO SERVICE
CO1VIMF. RCIAL ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE
EASTERLY SIDE OF YNEZ ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 170
FEET NORTH OF SOLANA WAY AND KNOWN AS
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 921-680--007
WltEREAS, Terraton Corporation fried Planning Application No. PA95-0134 in
accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Riverside County Land Use and
Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference;
WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PA95-0134 was processed in the time and manner
prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. PA95-0134
on January 8, 1996, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time
interested persons had an oppormhity to testify either in support or in opposition;
WttF.~, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and
arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, the Commission considered all facts
relath~g to Planning Application No. PA95-0134;
NOW, TI:IF. REFORE, TtIR PLANNING COS/ISIISSION OF TIFF. CITY OF
TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETF_,R54]NE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
Section 2. Findings.
A. The Planning Contmission in recommending approval of Planning Application No.
PA95-0134, makes the following findings, to wit:
1. The proposal is consistent with all applicable sections of the General Plan.
2. The proposal is compatible with surrounding land uses which are existing
and future commercial developments.
3. Mitigation measures in contained' within the Mitigation Monitoring
Program will reduce the impacts of the proposal a level of significance.
R:\STAF~I33PA95.PC 1/3/96 klb '[ 0
4. The site of the proposal is suitable to accommodate the land uses described
in the General Plan due to the fact that the requirements of the General Plan, the development
standards proposed within the Draft Development Code and the mitigation measures within the
Negative Declaration ensure orderly development of the site.
5. Said findings are supported by analysis, maps, exhibits, and environmental
documents associated with this application and herein incorporated by reference.
B. As conditioned pursuant to Section 4, Planning Application No. PA95-0134, as
proposed, is compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community.
Section 3. Environmental Compliance. Pursuant to the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA), an Initial Study has been prepared for this proposal. The Initial Study
determined that although the proposed proposal could have a significant effect on the
environment, these effects are not considered to be significant due to mitigation measures
contained in the project design and in the Mitigation Monitoring Program. These will mitigate
any potentially significant impacts to a level of insignificance; therefore staff recommends that
the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council adopt a Negative Declaration for the
proposal.
Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby
recommends approval of Planning Application No. PA95-0134 to change the General Plan Land
Use Designation on an approximately .67 acres of land from Community Commercial to Service
Commercial on property located on the easterly side of Ynez Road, approximately 270 feet north
of the intersection of Ynez Road and Solana Way and known as Assessor' s Parcel No. 921-680-
007.
R:\STAFFRPTM33PA95.PC 1/3196 kJb ~ ~
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOFrED this 8th day of January, 1996.
STEVEN J. FORD
CHAInMAN
I B'F. REBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 8th day of
January, 1996 by the following vote of the Commission:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
DEBBIE UBNOSKE
SECRETARY
a:xs~Amnum~ssP^95.pc m/96 klb 12
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
INITIAL STUDY
R:\STAFFRPT'x133PA95.pC 1/3/96 klb 1 ~3
CITY OF TEMECULA
Environmental Checklist
m
Project Title:
Planning Application No. 95-0133, Change of Zone
Planning Application No. 95-0134, General Plan Amendment
Planning Application No. 95-0136, Revised Permit
Lead Agency Name and Address:
City of Temecula
43714 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
Contact Person and Phone Number: Craig Ruiz (909) 694-6400
Project Location: Easterly side of Ynez Road, approximately 270 feet northerly of
Solana Way
Project Sponsor's Name and Address:
Terraton Corp.
P.O. Box 2159
Escondido, CA 92033
General Plan Designation: CC (Community Commercial)
Zoning: C1/CP (General Commercial)
Description of Project: Zoning Amendment to change the zoning from Community
Commercial (CC) to Service Commercial (SC), General Plan Amendment to change
the Land Use Designation from Community Commercial (CC) to Service Commercial
(SC), and a Revised Permit to allow the expansion of an existing car dealership to an
adjacent and vacant parcel of land.
Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The site is an approximately .6 acre vacant
parcel in a neighborhood commercial shopping center. The shopping center is located
immediately to the east of the site, car dealerships are located to the west and north,
and to the south is vacant land. The property to the south is currently undergoing
development review for a proposed gas station, mini-market and self-service car
wash.
10.
Other public agencies whose approval is required: Riverside County Fire Department,
Riverside County Health Department, Eastern Municipal Water District, Rancho
California Water District, Southern California Gas Company, Southern California
Edison Company, General Telephone Company.
R:\STAFFRPT~133PA95.PC 1/3196 Idb 14
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project,
involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the
checklist on the following pages.
[ (~ Land Use and Planning [ ]
[ ] Population and Housing .. [ ]
[ ] Geologic Problems [ ]
[ ] Water [ ]
[ ] Air Quality [ ]
[ ] Transportation/Circulation [ ]
[ ] Biological Resources [ ]
[ ] Energy and Mineral Resources [ ]
Hazards
Noise
Public Services
Utilities and Service Systems
Aesthetics
Cultural Resources
Recreation
Mandatory Findings of Significance
DETERMINATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
[]
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant on the environment,
and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
IX]
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the
environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation
measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A
NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
[]
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment,
and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment,
but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document
pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation
measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect
is a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated." An
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects
that remain to be addressed.
R:\STAFFRP'~I33PA95.PC 113196 klb 15
[]
I find that although the 'proposed project could have a significant effect on the
environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all
potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in a earlier EIR
pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to
that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the
proposed project.
SignatUre ?~ Date
Craig D. Ruiz
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS:
Issues and Supporting:Information Sources
,:: : ~;::
1. LAND USE AND PLANNING.
Potentially
· : Significant
Potentially Un|es~
Significant Mitigation
: Impact :: Incorporated
Would the proposal:
a. Conflict with general plan designation or
zoning? (1, F2ol, p. 2-17)
X
Conflict with applicable environmental
plans or policies adopted by agencies with
jurisdiction over the project? (2)
c. Be incompatible with existing land use in
the vicinity? (1, F2-1, p. 2-17)
da
Affect agricultural resources or operations
(e.g. impacts to soils or farmlands, or
impacts from incompatible land uses)? (1,
F5-4, p. 5-17)
Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement
of an established community (including
low-income or minority community)? ( )
2. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal:.
an
Cumulatively exceed official regional or
local population projections? (1, T4-2a, p.
4-5)
bu
Induce substantial growth in an area either
directly or indirectly (e.g. through project
in an undeveloped area or extension of
major infrastructure)? (1, T4-2a, p. 4-5)
c. Displace existing housing, especially
affordable housing? (1, F2-1, p. 2-17)
GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result
in or expose people to potential impacts involving?
a. Fault rupture? (1, F7-1, p 7-6)
Seismic ground shaking? (1, F7-1, p 7-6)
Seismic ground failure, including
liquefaction?
(1, F7-2, p 7-9)
d. Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard? ( )
Leaa Than
SignifiGant
Impact
X
X
Impact
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
R:\STAFFRPTM33PAgS.PC 113196 Idb 17
Issuesand ::Supporting: Information Sources
ImpBct
e. Landslides or mudflows? (2, pgs. 65-70)
f. Erosion, changes in topography or
unstable soil conditions from excavation,
grading or fill? (2, pgs 65-70)
g. Subsidence of the land? (1, F7-2, p 7-9)
h. Expansive soils? (2, pgs 60-65)
i. Unique geologic or physical features? (2,
pgs 60-65)
WATER. Would the proposal result in:
8.
Changes in absorption rates, drainage
patterns, or the rate and mount of surface
runoff? ( )
b. Exposure of people or property to water
related hazards such as flooding? (1, F7-
3, p. 7-10 and 1, F7-4, p. 7-12)
c. Discharge into surface waters or other
alteration of surface water quality (e.g.
temperature, dissolved oxygen or
turbidity)?
( )
d. Changes in the amount of surface water in
any water body? ( )
e. Changes in currents, or the course or
direction of water movements? ( )
f. Chj~nge in the quantity of ground waters,
either through direct additions or
withdrawals, or through interception of an
aquifer by cuts or excavations or through
substantial loss of groundwater recharge
capability? ( )
g. Altered direction or rate of flow of
groundwater? ( )
h. Impacts to groundwater quality? ( )
: Potentially
Significant
Unless
:-Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
R:\STAFFRPT%I33PA95.PC I/3/96 klb' 18
Issues and Supporting:Information Sources
i. Substantial reduction in the amount of
groundwater otherwise available for public
water supplies? ( )
5. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal:
ae
Violate any air quality standard or
contribute to an existing or projected air
quality violation? (2, pgs. 70-92)
b. 'Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants?
( )
Alter air movement, moisture or
temperature, or cause any change in
climate? ( )
d. Create objectionable odors? ( )
TRAN SPO RTATI O N/CI RCU LATI ON.
Would the proposal result in:
Increase vehicle trips or traffic
congestion ?
(2, pgs 201-239)
Hazards to safety from design features
(e.g. sharp curves or dangerous
intersection or incompatible uses (e.g.
farm equipment)? ( )
c. Inadequate emergency access or access
to nearby uses? ( )
d. Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-
site? ( )
e. Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or
bicyclists? ( ) ~
Conflicts with adopted policies supporting
alternative transportation (e.g. bus
turnouts, bicycle racks)? (2, pgs. 201-
239)
-g. Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts? ( )
Potentielly
'Significant
Impact
Potentially
Signifk:ant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
· Less Than
Significant
Impact
X
X
Impec~
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
R:\STAFFRlr~133PA95.PC 113196 idb 19
Potentially
Issues: .and!:Supporting Information Sources : sig.ffioant
:.~:: .!' !!:i !. · : Impact
7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal
result in impacts to:
ae
Endangered, threatened or rare species or
their habitats (including but not limited to
plants, fish, insects, animals and birds)?
b. Locally designated species (e.g. heritage
trees)? ( )
Cs
Locally designated natural communities
(e.g. oak forest, coastal habitat, etc.)?
F5-3, pg 5-15)
d. Wetland habitat (e.g. marsh, riparian and
vernal pool)? (1, F5o3, pg 5-15)
e. Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? (
)
8. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES.
Would the proposal:
a. Conflict with adopted energy conservation
plans? ( )
b. Use non-renewal resources in a wasteful
and inefficient manner? ( )
Cs
Result in the loss of availability of a
known mineral resource that would be of
future value to the region and the
residents of the State?
( )
9. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve:
as
A risk of accidental explosion or release of
hazardous substances (including, but not
limited to: oil, pesticides, chemical or
radiation)? ( )
be
Possible interference with an emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation
plan?
( )
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
R:~.STAFFRPT~I33?A95.PC 1/3/96 kJb 20
10.
11.
Issues and Supp:orting: Information Sources .
c. The creation of any health hazard or
potential health hazard? ( )
d. Exposure of people to existing sources of
potential health hazards? ( )
e. Increase fire hazard in areas with
flammable brush, grass, or trees? ( )
NOISE. Would the proposal result in:
a. Increase in existing noise levels? ( )
b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels?
( )
PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an
effect upon, or result in a need for new or
altered government services in any of the
Potentially
Signfficant
Impact
Potentially
SigniFyant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
following areas:
a. Fire protection? ( ) X
b. Police protection? ( ) X
c. Schools7 ( ) X
d. Maintenance of public facilities, including X
roads? ( )
e. Other governmental services? ( )
Impact
X
X
X
X
R:\STAFFP,.PT%133PA95,PC 1/3/96 klb 21
12.
Issues and Supporting. Information Sources
Impact
: ' Potentially:
Signire}ant
' · Potentially : . Unless.
IVlitigation
Incorporated
UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the
proposal result in a need for new systems
or supplies, or substantial alterations
to the following utilities:
a.
b.
C.
Power or natural gas? ( )
Communications systems? ( )
Local or regional water treatment or
distribution facilities? ( )
Sewer or septic tanks? ( )
Storm water drainage? ( )
Solid waste disposal? ( )
Local or regional water supplies? ( )
13. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal:
a. Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? (
)
b. Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic
effect? ( )
c. Create light or glare? ( )
14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal:
a. Disturb paleontological resources? (2,
F55, p.280)
b. Disturb archaeological resources? (2,
F56, p. 283)
c. Affect historical resources? (2, p. 281)
d. Have the potential to oause a physical
change which would affect unique ethnic
cultural values? ( )
e. Restrict existing religious or sacred uses
within the potential impact area? ( )
15. RECREATION. Would the proposal:
X
Lass Than
Significant
Impact
Impact
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
R:\STAFFR.PT~133PA95.PC 113196 klb 22
Issues andSupportingJnformation Sources : Sign,it.., M~jga~n
: : .: ::.:.: :: Impact incorporated
aa
Increase the demand for neighborhood or
regional parks or other recreational
facilities?
( )
b. Affect existing recreational opportunities?
( )
Leas Than
Significant.
Impact.
X
X
R:\STAFFP, l~I33PA95.PC 1/3196 ldb 23
16.
17.
· !. ;; Potentially
:.-:: .........: - :.~: Signifk}ant
Issues:: and: Supporti ng:::~ Information Sources ~ ~ ~ ~ s~nmc,,,t ~. e~at~on
: ':; :: :' i: :~ i: .: :.: : Impact ' Incorporated
MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
Less Than
Significant.
Impact
No
Impact
a. Does the project have the potential to
degrade the quality of the environment,
substantially reduce the habitat of a fish
or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self-sustaining
levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or
animal community, reduce the number of
restrict the range of a rare or endangered
plant or animal or eliminate important
examples of the major periods of
California history or prehistory?
b. Does the project have the potential to
achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of
long-term, environmental goals?
c. Does the project have impacts that area
individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? ("Cumulatively
considerable" means that eh incremental
effects of a project are considerable when
viewed in connection with the effects of
past projects, the effects of other current
projects, and the effects of probable
future projects).
d. Does the project have environmental
effects which will cause substantial
adverse effects on human beings, either
directly or indirectly?
EARLIER ANALYSES.
X
X
X
X
Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or
other CEQA process, one ~r more effects have been adequately analyzed in an
earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a
discussion should identify the following on attached sheets.
a. Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are
available for review.
R:\STAFFRPT%I33PA95.PC 1/3/96 Idb 24
Potentially
': ': :: :~ · Significant
: Potentially Unless Less Than
Issues and Supporting Information Sources S~n~i~-ant ~4~i.et~. S~nif~t No
Impact I~o~rated' !mp~t Impa~
b. Impacts adequately addressed. Identi~ which affects from the above check
list were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier documen~
pursuant to applicable legal standards, and sZa~e whether such effects were
addressed by miZigation measures based on the earlier analysis.
c. Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant wi~h
Mitigation Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were'
incorporated or refined from the earlier documen~ and the extent to which
~hey address site-specific conditions for the project.
J - Ci~ of Tem~ula Gene~ ~
: - Cit7 o[ TemecuJa Gene~ ~]~ F~ Env~omen~ Zmpact ~o~
R:\STAFFRPT~I33PA95.pC 1/3/96 klb 2~
DISCUSSION OF ~ ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Land Use and Planning
1.a.
The project is a request for a change of zone and general plan amendment.
project be approved, the zoning map and general plan for the City
accordingly.
Thus, should the
will be amended
I.e.
The project will not disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community
(including low-income or minority community). The project is in an existing commercial
center. There is no established residential community (including low-income or minority
community) at this site.
Geologic Problems
3.a.b.
Any development of the site will expose people and property to earthquake hazards since the
project is located in Southern California, an area which is seismically active. Any potential
impacts will be mitigated through building construction which is consistent with Uniform
Building Code standards. Information contained in the City of Temecula General Plan
Environmental Impact Report (certified November 9, 1993) states that the project wffi not
expose people or property to geologic hazards such as landslides or mudslides. No known
landslides are located on the site or proximate to the site. The same is tree for mudslides.
There is no potential for ground failure and liquefaction in this area.
3.d.
The project will not expose people to a seiche, tsunami or volcanic hazard. The projedt is not
located in an area where any of these hazards could occur.
3.f.
The project will have a less than significant impact from erosion, changes in topography,
grading or fill. Increased wind and water erosion of soils both on and off-site. may occur
during the construction phase of the project and the project may result in changes in siltation,
deposition or erosion. Erosion control techniques will be included as a condition of approval
for the project. In the long-ran, hardscape and landscaping will serve as permanent erosion
control for the project. The project will result in a change in the site topography and ground
surface relief features for the creation of additional parking spaces on site. Grading will be
necessary for the realiTation of this project. Since the amount of grading will be the minimum
necessary for the realization of the project, modification to topography and ground surface
relief features wffi not be considered significant. Potential unstable soil conditions from
excavation, grading or fil,l will be mitigated through the use of landscaping and proper
compaction of the soils.
Water
4.a.
The project will result in changes to absorption rates, drainage paRems and the rate and
amount of surface runoff. Previously permeable ground will be rendered impervious by
construction of buildings, accompanying hardscape and driveways. While absorption rates and
surface runoff will change, any potential impacts can be mitigated through site design.
R:\STAFFRFBI33PA95.PC 1/3/96 klb 26
Drainage conveyances will be required for the project to safely and adequately handle the
runoff which will be created.
4.c.
The project may have a potentially significant effect on discharges into surface waters and
alteration of surface water quality. Prior to issuance of a grading permit for the project, the
developer will be required to comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No
grading shall be permitted until. an NPDES Notice of Intent has been fried or the project is
shownto be exempt. By complying with the N'PDES requirements, any potential impacts can
be mitigated to a level less than significant. Therefore, no significant impacts are anticipated
as a result of this project.
4.d.
The project will not result in a change in the amount of surface water in any waterbody. No
major waterbodies are located in the subject project area.
4.e.
The project will not impact currents, or to the course or direction of water movements. The
project site is not located adjacent to either marine or fresh water sources or areas where there
is concentrated currents or water movements.
4.f-h.
The project will not result in a change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct
additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations or
through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability. No changes will occur in the
quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions, withdrawals, or through interception
of an aquffer by cuts or excavations. Further, the project will not result in an altered direction
or rate of flow of groundwaters or in impacts to groundwater quality. Construction On the site
will not be at depths sufficient to have a significant impact on ground. waters.
4.i.
The project will not result in a substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater water
otherwise available for public water supplies. Water service currently exists at the project site.
Additional water service will need to be provided by Rancho California Water District
(RCWD). This is typically provided upon completion of financial arrangements between
RCWD and the property owner. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this
project.
Air Ouality
5.b.
The project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants. There are no sensitive receptors
in proximity to the project~
5.c.
The project will not alter air movement, moisture or temperature, or cause any change in
climate. The limited scale of the project precludes it from creating any significant impacts on
the environment in this area.
5.d.
The project will create objectional odors during the construction phase of the project. These
impacts will be of short duration and are not considered significant.
R:\STAFFRPTXI33PA95.PC 1/3/96 klb 27
Transportation/Circulation
6.8.
The project will result in a less than significant increase in vehicle trips and may add to traffic
congestion. It is anticipated that the project have a less than five (5) percent increase to the
nearest intersection (Solana Way and Ynez Roads during peak travel hour. The applicant will
be required to pay traffic signal mitigation fees and public facility fees as conditions of
approval for the project. No impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
6.b.c.
The project will not result in hazards to safety from design features. The project is in-fill
within an existing center. Further, the project is designed to current City standards and does
not propose any hazards to safety from design features.
6.d.
The project will have sufficient parking capacity on-site. The applicant has completed a
parking needs analysis based upon the uses proposed by this project. Based upon this analysis,
there will be sufficient on-site parking spaces provided.
6.e.
The project will not result in hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists. A sidewalk exist
on the site along Ynez Road. Hazards or barriers to bicyclists have not been included as part
of the project.
6.g.
The project will not result in impacts to rail, waterborne or air traffic since none exists
currently in the immediate proximity of the project.
Biological Resources
7.8.
The project will not result in an impact to endangered, threatened or rare species or their
habitats, including, but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals and birds. The project site
has been previously graded and is located adjacent to a commercial shopping center.
Currently, there are no native species of plants, no unique, rare, threatened or .endangered
species of plants, no native vegetation on or adjacent to the site. Further, there is no
indication that any wildlife species exist at this location. The project will not reduce the
number of species, provide a barrier to the migration of animals or deteriorate existing habitat.
The project site is located within the Stephen's Kangaroo Rat Habitat Fee Area. Habitat
Conservation fees will be required to mitigate the effect of cumulative impacts to the species.
No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
7.b.
The project will not result in an impact to locally designated species. Locally designated
species are protected in the, Old Town Temecula Specific Plan; however, they are not protected
elsewhere in the City. Since this project is not located in Old Town, no significant impacts
are anticipated as a result of this project.
7.e.
The project will not result in an impact to wildlife dispenal or migration corridors. The
project site does not serve as part of a migration corridor.
R:k~TAFFRP'BI33PAg,~.PC 1/3/96 Itlb 2~
Energy
8.a.
8.b.
8.c.
Hazards
and Mineral Resources
The project will not impact and/or conflict with adopted energy conservation plans. The
project will be reviewed for compliance with all applicable laws pertaining to energy
conservation during the plan check stage. No permits will be issued unless the project is found
to be consistent with these applicable laws.
The project will result in a less than significant impact for the use of non-renewable resources
in a wasteful and inefficient manner. While there will be an increase in the rate of use of any
natural resource and in the depletion of nonrenewable resource(s) (construction materials, fuels
for the daily operation, asphalt, lumber) and the subsequent depletion of these non-renewable
natural resources. Due to the scale of the proposed development, these impacts are not seen
as significant.
The project will not result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would
be of future value to the region and the residents of the State. No known mineral resource that
would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State are located at this project
site. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
9.a.
9.b.
9.c.
9.d.
9.e.
Noise
The project will not result in a risk of explosion, or the release of any hazardous substances
in the event of an accident or upset conditions since none are proposed in the request. The
same is tree for the use, storage, transport or disposal .of any hazardous or toxic materials.
The project will not interfere with an emergency response plan or an-emergency evaluation
plan. The subject site is not located in an area which could impact an emergency response
plan. The project will take access from a maintained street and will therefore not impede any
emergency response or emergency evacuation plans.
The project will not result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard. The
project will be reviewed for compliance with all applicable health laws during the plan check
stage. No permits will be issued unless the project is found to be consistent with these
applicable laws.
The project will not expose people to existing sources of potential health hazards. No health
hazards are known to be within proximity of the project.
The project will not result in an increase to fire hazard in an area with ~ammable brush, grass,
or trees. The project is not located within or proximate to a fire hazard area.
10.a.
The proposal will result in increases to existing noise levels. The site is curren~y vacant and
any development of the land would result in increases to noise levels during construction
phases as well as increases to noise in the area over the long run. The project site is located
within a commercial corridor. There are no sensitive receptors located in the area.
R:\STAFFRP'BI33PA95.PC 1/3/96 klb 29
lO.b.
The project may expose people to severe noise levels and vibrations during the
development/construction phase (short run). Construction machinery is capable of producing
noise in. the range of 100+ DBA at 100 feet which is considered very annoying and can cause
hearing damage from steady 8-hour exposure. This. source of noise will be of short duration
and therefore will not be considered significant.
Public Services
ll.a,b.
The project will have a less than significant impact upon, or result in a need for new or altered
fire or police protection. The project will incrementally increase the need for fire and police
protection; however, it will contribute its fair share to the maintenance of service provision
from these entities.
ll.c.
The project will have a less than significant impact upon, or result in a need for .new or altered
school facilities. The project will not cause significant numbers of people to relocate to the
City of Temecula and therefore will not result in a need for new or altered school facilities.
.ll.d.
The project will have a less than significant impact for the maintenance of public facilities,
including roads. Funding for maintenance of roads is derived from the Gasoline Tax which
is distributed to the City of Temecula from the State of California. Impacts to current and
future needs for maintenance of roads as a result of development of the site will be
incremental, however, they will not be considered significant. The Gasoline Tax is sufficient
to cover any of the proposed expenses.
ll.e.
The project will not have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental
services. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
Utilities and Service Systems
12.a.
The project will not result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations to
power or natural gas. These systems are curren~y being delivered to the site.
12.b.
The project will not result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations to
communication systems (reference response No. 12.a.).
12.c.
The project will have a less than significant effect in the need for new systems or supplies, or
substantial alterations to local or regional water treatment or distribution facilities.
12.d.
The project will not result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations to
sanitary sewer systems or septic tanks. While the project will have an incremental impact
upon existing systems, the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) for the City's General
Plan states: "both ElVlWD and RCWD have indicated an ability to supply as much water as
is required in their services areas (p. 39)." The FEIR further states: "implementation of the
proposed General Plan would not significantly impact wastewater services (,p. 40)." Since the
project is consistent with the City's General Plan, no significant impacts are anticipated as a
result of this project. There are no .septic tanks on site or proximate to the site.
R:\STAFFR.PT~I33PA95.PC !/3/96 klb 30
12.e.
The proposal will result in a need for new systems .or supplies, or substantial alterations to
storm water drainage. The project is in-fill, and will need to provide some additional on-site
drainage systems. The drainage system will be required as a condition of approval for the
project and will tie into the existing system.
12.f.
The proposal will not result in a need for new systems or substantial alterations to solid waste
disposal systems. Any potential impacts from solid waste created by this development can be
mitigated through participation in any Source Reduction and Recycling Programs which are
implemented by the City.
12.g.
The project will not result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations to
local or regional water supplies. Reference response 12. d.
Aesthetics
13 .a.
The project will not affect a scenic vista or scenic highway. The project is in-fill and is not
located in a area where there is a scenic vista. Further, the City does not have any designated
scenic highways.
13 . b. The project is an inffil in nature and will not have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect.
13.c.
The project will have a potentially significant impact from light and glare. The project will
produce and result in light/glare as all development of this nature results in new light sources.
All light and glare has the potential to impact the Mount Palomar Observatory. The project
will be conditioned to be consistent with Ordinance No. 655 (Ordinance Regulating Light
Pollution).
Cultural Resources
14.d.
The project will not have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique
ethnic cultural values. None exist at the site or are proximate to the site. No significant
impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
14.e.
The project will not restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area.
No religious or sacred uses exist at the site or are proximate to the site. No significant impacts
are anticipated as a result of this project.
Recreation
15 .a,b.
The proposal will not result in impacts to the quality or quantity of existing recreational
resources or opportunities. The project will not cause significant numbers of people to relocate
to the City of Temecula and therefore will not result in impacts to the quality or quantity of
existing recreational resources or opportunities.
R:\STAFFRPT',I33PA95.PC 1/3/96 klb 3']
A'I'I'ACHIVIENT NO. 3
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
R:\STAFFRPT~133PA95.pC 1/3/9~
32
,< <
A3'I'ACHMENT NO. 4
EXHIBITS
R:~qTAFFRPT~133PAgS.PC 1/3/96 klb 38
CITY OF TEMECULA
(I
//
TEMECULA -
/RANCHO ."' ..... ~ CALIFO~-~IA
· 'zso;o z~loo ~1
CASE NO. - PA95-133, PA95-0134
EXHIBIT- A
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - JANUARY 8, 1996
VICINITY MAP
II
R: \STAFFR. P'~I33PAg$.PC 1/3196 Irlb
CITY OF TEMECULA
EXHIBIT B - ZONING MAP
DESIGNATION - C1/CP (GENERAL COMMERCIAL)
EXHIBIT C - GENERAL PLAN
3ESIGNATION - COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL
CASE NO. - PA95-0133, PA95-0134
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - JANUARY 8, 1996
R:\STAFFR. F~I33PA95.PC 1/3/96 klb
ITEM 29
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manage/~r'
Gary Thornhill, Community Development Director
February 13, 1996
Interim Planning Application Fees
Prepared By:
John Meyer, Senior Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Department Staff recommends the City Council:
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 96-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING INTERIM PLANNING APPLICATION
FEES
BACKGROUND
On December 19, 1995, the City Council adopted the Development Code. As a result, new
Planning Applications go into effect on February 9, 1996. The Development Code includes
new and renamed applications that are not reflected on the City's current fee schedule.
ANALYSIS
The City is nearing completion of a comprehensive User Fee Study that reflects the
applicatioris found in the New Development Code. At the present time, all City departments
have prepared draft fees. However, due to a time and motion study being done by the
Building and Safety Department, staff is not prepared to present these fees to the City
Council. This time and motion study was begun in November of 1995 and will take
approximately six months to complete. At the conclusion of this time, staff will meet with the
development community in a series of workshops to discuss the fees. Following these
workshops, staff will bring the User Fee Study to the City Council. In the interim, staff
recommends the adoption of an interim fee schedule. The proposed schedule is attached for
your review. The fees were established by using the current application that most closely
resembles the new application. These proposed fees will be valid for a period of thirty days,
unless extended following a public hearing. Staff will notice a public hearing for the Council
on the March 12, 1996 meeting. These will be in effect until the new user fees are adopted.
This action requires a 4/5 vote.
R:~AFFI~'F~.CC 2n/~6 Im~ 1
FISCAL IMPACT
None.
Attachments:
1. Resolution No. 96-
2.
.. - Page 2
Interim Planning Application Fee Schedule - Page 5
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
RESOLUTION NO. 96-
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
RESOLUTION NO. 96-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING INTERIM PLANNING
APPLICATION FEES
WHEREA~, The City Council adopted the General Plan on November 9, 1993.
WtlERE~kS, The General Plan for the City of Temecula calls for the adoption of a
Development Code.
WHEREAS, On December 19,1995, the City Council adopted the Development Code.
WtlEI~EAS, The Development Code results in new Planning Applications.
NOW, THF_~EFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Findings. That the Temecula Council makes the following findings:
1. The City's new Development Code became effective on February 9, 1996; and
2. The new Development Code generally replaces existing planning application
processes, procedures, and fees; and
3. Without established application fees to implement the new Development Code,
either applications ~ed until such new fees are adopted would be held or City general fund
revenues would be required to cover the costs of funding private. development pwjects resulting
in less funding available for public safety among other uses; and
4. Without interim authority to change fees for planning applications under the new
Development Code, any application funding would be done with City general fund sources
decreasing funding available for other public services including, public safety, recreation, and
street maintenance. Such a result would jeopardize the welfare of the public and be inconsistent
with City goals of keeping Temecuh a desirable place to live, work, and raise families.
Section 2. The City Council hereby adopts, as authorized by the new Development Code
the fees as set forth in Exhibit "A" , attached hereto and.incorporated herein by this reference,
as the interim fees for processing planning applications under the new Development Code.
Section 3. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66017C0) this resolution and the fees
adopted herein are interim fees necessary to protect the public health, safety, and welfare as set
forth above and shall take effect immediately upon adoption by a four-fifths vote of the City
Council.
Section 4. The fees adopted herein shall be valid for a period of thirty (30) days unless
extended by the City Council pursuant to Government Code Section 66017(b) following notice
and a public hearing in accordance with Government Code Section 66016.
t Section $. Environmental Compliance. The Interim Planning Application Fees are not
a~lproject under the California Environmental Quality Act.
Section 6. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution.
Section 7. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOFrED this 13th day of February,
1996.
Karel Lindemans, Mayor
A~FEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TElVIEC~
I ItEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City
Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 13th day of February,
1996 by the following vote of the City Council:
COUNCILMF-MBERS
NOES:
COUNCILMF-MBERS
COUNCILlVfEMBERS
June S. Greek, City Clerk
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
INTERIM PLANNING APPLICATION FEE SCHEDULE
R:~STAFFRI'I'~rfV.,~ES.CC 2/7/96 im 6
General Plan Amendment
Zoning Amendment ..
Text Changes
Map Changes
Specific Plan
Conditional Use Permit - Existing Building
Conditional Use Permit- New Building
Development Plan (10,000 square feet or greater)
Development Plan (less than 10,000 square feet)
Development Plan (less than 10,000 square feet - exempt from CEQA)
Variance
Temporary Use Permits
Minor Exceptions
Home Occupation Permit
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
INTERIM PLANNING APPLICATION FEE SCHEDULE
· ·:·APPLICATION .......
FEE'
$5,563
3,617
3,617
15,578
888
5,790.
5,445
3,105
2,095
1,954
190
190
20
ITEM 30
APPROVAL
C I TY ATTORNEY
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Manager/City Council
Genie Roberts, Director of Finance
February 13, 1996
Review and Approval of the 22nd Year Community Development Block
Grant Applications for FY 1996-97
PREPARED BY:
Allie Kuhns, Senior Management Analyst~4~'
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council review the Community Development Block
Grant (CDBG) funding recommendations submitted by the Finance Committee, and provide
final recommendations to be forwarded to the Riverside County Economic Development
Agency (EDA) for consideration.
DISCUSSION: The CDBG program is a federal grant program administered by the
Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) through local governments. The
objectives of this program are to develop adequate housing, a suitable living environment, and
to increase economic development in the community· In order for a project to be considered
for funding, it must meet one of the following national goals:
Low/moderate income persons primarily benefit from the activity; or,
The activity aids in the prevention or elimination of slums or blight; or,
The activity meets an emergent community development need.
A total of eleven (11 ) qualified applications were submitted to the City for consideration. The
applications are summarized in priority order in Attachment A.
Preliminary estimates from the EDA allocate approximately $242,000 for non-public service
projects, and approximately $43,000 for public service projects. The City received one non-
public service application requesting a grant in the amount of $240,000, and ten (10) public
service project applications totalling $75,669. A prioritized breakdown of all projects,
requested funding, and Finance Committee recommendations is summarized in Attachment
B.
The Committee recommendations were based on the assumption that the entire amount of
$43,000 will be available. Since there is still an uncertainty as to the actual amount to be
funded, and the amount of funding available for public service projects may be less than the
estimated amount, the recommendations have been listed in priority order to provide the EDA
with the City's preferred projects to which appropriated funds should be allocated.
FISCAL IMPACT: All CDBG funds allocated to City projects will replace other funding
sources (i.e., General Fund, Community Services District), which can then be used for other
appropriate projects. The CDBG funds allocated to outside agencies have no impact on the
City, since the City merely serves as a conduit for administering funds provided by the County.
Attachments:
A. Community Development Block Grant Application Summary
B. Prioritized CDBG Funding Recommendations
CDBG FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS
IN-~L~DER OF PRIORITY
AL,,,,JISITION/FACILITIES PROJECTS
Sam Hicks Monument Park
Temecula Community Center
Acquisition
TOTAL ACQUISITION PROJECTS
AGENCY
TCSD
TCSD
FINANCE
PRIOR COMMrI'I'EE
YEAR FUNDING FUNDING
AWARD REQUESTED RECOMMENDED
$248,403 $0 N/A
N/A $240,000
$248,403 $240,000
$242,000
$242,000
PUBLIC SERVICE PROJECTS
Temecula Recreation and
Human Services
TCSD
N/A $12,500
$12,500
Emergency Food & Aid
Alternatives to
Domestic Violence
Boys & Girls Club
P~-Temecula
Operation School Bell
Temecula Valley
Special Olympics
SafeHouse - Emergency Shelter
for Runaway/Homeless Youth
Rape Awarness and Prevention
Parent Center
Emergency Cold Weather
Shelter Program
Family Friends
TOTAL PUBLIC SERVICE PROJECTS
Temecula Senior Center $10,000 $10,000
Alternatives to $2,500 $2,500
Domestic Violence
Boys &Girls Club $10,000 $28,080
Of Temecula
Assistance League of $5,000 $10,000
Temecula Valley
Temecula Valley Special N/A $1,600
Olympics
Operation Safe House N/A $2,000
Riverside Area Rape
Crisis Center
Parent Center
Riverside Dept of
Community Action
VIP Tots
N/A $3,000
$5,000 $5,000
N/A $989
$5,000 N/A
$37,500 $75,669
$10,000
$2,500
$10,000
$5,000
$500
$500
$1,000
$1,000
$0
N/A
$43,000
GRAND TOTAL OF ALL PROJECTS $285,903 $315,669 $285,000
ITEM 3 1
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
· City Council · ·
FROM:
Ronald E. Bradley, City Manager
DATE:
February 13, 1996
SUBJECT:
Temecula Valley In-Line Hockey Association Request
~ ha
PREPARED BY: ~ wn
RECOMMENDATION:
D. Nelson, Director of Community Services
1)
That the City Council consider a request from the Temecula Valley In-Line Hockey
Association to provide a matching grant for every ~ 1.00 raised and in-kind services
provided not to exceed $32,500;
2)
Appropriate $32,500 to the Community Services Funding account from General Fund
Reserves.
BACKGROUND: At the January 23, 1996 City Council meeting, staff was directed to
investigate the status of the Temecula Valley In-Line Hockey Association's (TVIHA) Roller
Hockey Rink Project and provide information to the City Council regarding possible funding
alternatives.
On December 1, 1994, the Temecula Town Association entered into a forty (40) year lease
agreement with TVIHA for $1.00 per year to provide the land necessary to construct a roller
hockey rink. TVIHA has estimated that the cost of constructing the roller hockey rink is
approximately $70,000. Currently, TVIHA has received a $5,000 grant from the City and has
received an additional $20,000 in cash donations and in-kind construction services.
As a result, TVIHA is requesting that the City Council consider providing a matching grant,
dollar for dollar, in an amount not to exceed $32,500 for cash donations and in-kind donated
services.
FISCAL IMPACT: The cost of the roller hockey rink is estimated at $70,000. The City has
currently awarded ~5,000 to TVIHA from the FY1994-95 Community Services Funding
Program. It is requested that the remaining $65,000 be generated in the form of a matching
grant, with the City's contribution not to exceed $32,500. The criteria for the matching grant
is requested to include both cash donations and in-kind donated services. The cost of the
grant will be funded from General Fund Reserves.
ITEM 32
CITYMANAGER~/~
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA.
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Gary Thornhill, Community Development Directo~2~''
February 13, 1996
Direction on the Development of a Sign Ordinance Committee
Prepared By:
RECOMMENDATION:
David W. Hogan, Senior Planner
Staff recommends that the Council consider Option I, the
creation of a sign ordinance committee to help staff in developing
a locally appropriate sign ordinance.
BACKGROUND
The City adopted its new General Plan and Development Code in 1993 and 1995,
respectively. The next major development control that needs to be updated and made locally
appropriate is a City Sign Ordinance. The purpose of this Agenda Report is to get Council
direction on the need for a Committee to help staff prepare an ordinance for the Planning
Commission's and City Council's consideration.
DISCUSSION
Staff has already started investigating alternative signage. The key question for staff,
however, is the composition and degree of community involvement in preparing the new
ordinance. The options described below all take a different approach to community
participation. In each alternative, it is envisioned that staff would draft the ordinance, and that
the Commission and Council would review the requirements and standards during several
public hearings. The key question is the level of pre-hearing public participation used to
develop the new sign ordinance. Three major alternatives are as follows.
Appoint a committee, which represents the entire community, to provide
direction for and comments on the future sign ordinance. The Committee would
work with Community Development Department staff on a proposed ordinance
before it is presented to, and considered by, the City Planning Commission and
Council. It is also recommended that the composition of the Committee reflect
the wider community, not just local business interests. This process would be
similar to the approach used to create the new development code.
R:\SIGNCOMM\SIGNCOM.CC12/5~96 dwh I
II.
III.
Staff suggests that a Committee composed of the following be considered by the
Council.
0
0
0
0
0
0
One City Councilmember;
One Planning Commissioner;
Two representatives from local businesses;
One commercial property manager or realtor;
One representative from the Chamber of Commerce; and
Five interested residents of the City who are appointed by the
Council and do not have .significant local business affiliations.
Staff prepares a discussion draft of the sign ordinance and holds several
community meetings and workshops with interested parties before the
ordinance is considered by the Commission and Council. This approach is
similar to the process used to develop the City's temporary sign ordinances in
so far that only directly affected individuals are likely to participate.
Have staff work directly with the Commission and Council on the new City sign
ordinance. Staff would prepare a draft ordinance for the Commission and
Council's consideration. Community input would be limited to the public
hearing process. This process is similar to the ordinance preparation process
for noncontroversial and relatively minor City regulatory activities.
CONCLUSION
An appropriate sign ordinance is a key determinate of the future character and quality of a
community. However, sign regulations also have a potential to create local controversy. This
is because adequate signage is often perceived as the key to a successful business. As a
result, staff recommends that the Council consider Option I, or any other approach that
maximizes community input and involvement.
FISCAL IMPACT
This work activity is part of the Community Development Department's 1995-96 Budget.
Because the cost of developing this project is included in the budget, the overall fiscal impact
to the City should be minimal.
R:\SIGNCOMM\SIGNCOM.CC1 2~5~96 dwh 2