Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout072401 CC AgendaIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (909) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II] AGENDA TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL A REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE JULY 24, 2001 - 7:00 P.M. At approximately 9:45 P.M., the City Council will determine which of the remaining agenda items can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00 P.M. and may continue all other items on which additional time is required until a future meeting. All meetings are scheduled to end at 11:00 P.M. 6:00 P.M. - Closed Session of the City Council pursuant to Government Code Sections: Conference with City Attorney and legal counsel pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(b)(1) with respect to two matters of potential litigation. With respect to such matters, the City Attorney has determined that a point has been reached where there is a significant exposure to litigation involving the City based on existing facts and circumstances and the City will decide whether to initiate litigation. Public Information concerning existing litigation between the City and various parties may be acquired by reviewing the public documents held by the City Clerk. Next in Order: Ordinance: No. 2001-07 Resolution: No. 2001-67 CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Jeff Comerchero Prelude Music: Jennifer Taft Invocation: Pastor Sophia Sadler of Harvester Church of Temecula Flag Salute: Cub Pack No. 367 ROLL CALL: Naggar, Pratt, Roberts, Stone, Comerchero R:~Agenda\072401 1 PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 30 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Council on items that appear within the Consent Calendar or ones that are not listed on the agenda. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. if you desire to speak to the Council on an item which is listed on the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all Public Hearing or Council Business matters on the agenda, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk prior to the Council addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made at this time. A total, not to exceed, ten (10) minutes will be devoted to these reports. CONSENT CALENDAR NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. 1 Standard Ordinance and Resolution Adoption Procedure RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. 2 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the minutes of June 26, 2001. Resolution approving List of Demands RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: R:~Agenda\072401 2 RESOLUTION NO. 01- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A 4 Financial Statements for the nine months ended March 31, 2001 RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Receive and file the Financial Statements for the nine months ended March 31, 2001. Purchase of City Vehicle RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Approve the purchase of the Dodge Durango model year 2001 from Norm Reeves ChrysledJeep/Dodge in the amount of $29,576.63. Arts Council of Temecula Valley Concerts on the Green and Arts in the Country Festival Grant Aqreement RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Approve a Special Event Community Grant Agreement between the City of Temecula and the Arts Council of Temecula Valley in the amount of $34,000. FY2001-02 Economic Development Operating Agreements RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Approve the operating/marketing agreements with the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce, Economic Development Corporation of Southwest Riverside County, Temecula Valley Film Council, Inland Empire Economic Partnership, and Southwest Riverside County Economic Alliance; 7.2 Authorize the Mayor to execute the operating/marketing agreements for each of the organizations. 8 Award of Construction Contract for Starlight Ridge Southern Cross Road Sidewalk Project - Project No. PW00-22 RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 Award a construction contract for the Starlight Ridge Southern Cross Road Sidewalk Project - Project No. PW00-22 - to Elite Bobcat Service, Inc. in the amount of $51,790.00 and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract; 8.2 Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $5,179.00 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount. R:~Agenda\072401 3 9 Maintenance Aqreement - Habitat West, Inc. - Lon,q Canyon Detention Basin -- Project No. PW01-05 RECOMMENDATION: 9.1 Approve a five-year Maintenance Agreement with Habitat West, Inc. for a total amount not to exceed $26,140.00 and authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement. 10 Temecula Valley - La Serena Way Storm Drain - Stage 2 - Project No. 7-0-0315 - Tract Map No. 23371-11 - Cooperative Agreement RECOMMENDATION: 10.1 Approve the Margarita Road - Temecula Valley - La Serena Way Storm Drain - Stage 2 - Project No. 7-0-0315 - Tract Map No. 23371-11 - Cooperative Agreement with the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, the City of Temecula, and M.A. Temeku Hills Development, LLC; 10.2 Authorize the execution of such agreement in its final form by the Mayor, City Attorney, and City Clerk. 11 Tract Map No. 23143-5 - now in conformance with its original approval (located south of Pauba Road, east of Butterfield Stage Road, and north of De Portola Road) RECOMMENDATION: 11.1 Approve Tract Map No. 23143-51; 11.2 Approve the Subdivision Monument Agreement and accept the Monument cash deposit as security for the agreements; 12 State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) Discretionary Fund Application - Cherry Street Southbound Off-ramp Improvement Project RECOMMENDATION: 12.1 Receive and file the report regarding the 2002 State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) Discretionary Fund application for the Cherry Street Southbound Off-ramp Improvement Project and authorize the Director of Public Works to forward said application to the Riverside County Transportation Commission; 12.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO, 0'1- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA SUPPORTING THE CALTRANS APPLICATION TO THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION FOR 2002 STATE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM STREET PROJECT R:~genda~72401 DISCRETIONARY FUNDS FOR THE CHERRY SOUTHBOUND OFF-RAMP IMPROVEMENT 13 Professional Services Agreement for Bioloqical Observations and Monitoring - Lon,q Canyon Detention Basin - Project No. PW01-05 14 RECOMMENDATION: 13.1 Approve a five-year Professional Services Agreement with EDAW, Inc. for a total not to exceed $58,539.00 and authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement. Professional Services Aqreement for design services for Wolf Creek Fire Station Site - Project No. PW01-11 RECOMMENDATION: 14.1 Approve an acceleration of $100,000 from the Capital Improvement Budget for FY2002-2003 to the current FY2001-2002 budget for the Wolf Creek Fire Station Site - Project No. PW01-11; 14.2 Approve a Professional Services Agreement with STK Architecture, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $159,500.00 to provide design services for the Wolf Creek Fire Station Site - Project No. PW01-11 - within the planned Wolf Creek Development and authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement; 14.3 Authorize the City Manager to approve amendments/change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $15,950.00 which is equal to 10% of the agreement. 15 FY2000-2001 Slurry Seal Proqram - Project No. PW01-07 - Add Diaz Road RECOMMENDATION: 15.1 Authorize the City Manager to approve contract change orders with American Asphalt for an amount of $45,000 above the previously approved 10% contingency for the FY2000-2001 Slurry Seal Program - Project No. PW01~07. 16 Completion and Acceptance of Construction Contract for Old Town Southside Parkinq Lot - Project No. PW98o16 RECOMMENDATION: 16.1 Accept the Old Town Southside Park Lot Project - Project No. PW98-16 - as complete; 16.2 File a Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a 12-month Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract; 16.3 Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven months after filing of the Notice of Completion if no liens have been filed. R:~Agenda\072401 5 17 18 19 Third Amendment to Law Enforcement Services A.qreement with County of Riversid,, RECOMMENDATION: 17.1 Approve the third amendment to the Law Enforcement Services Agreement between the County of Riverside and the City of Temecula to include the hiring of one lieutenant, one traffic/motorcycle officer, and one community service officer. Rodpau.qh Specific Plan - Status Report RECOMMENDATION: 18.1 Receive and file. Walker Basin Specific Plan No. 172 substantial conformance No. 1 and Tentative Tract _Map No. 29369 RECOMMENDATION: 19.1 Authorize the City Manager to prepare a letter in support of the 106-dwelling unit proposal developed by the Riverside County Planning Department staff for the Walker Basin Specific Plan. 20 .Woods de Homes Traffic Signal Reimbursement RECOMMENDATION: 20.1 Approve the refund of the Traffic Signal Development Impact Fees in the amount of $45,000.00 to Woodside Homes of California for 50% of the cost of Traffic Signal Improvements at Margarita Road and Verde Lane. RECESS CITY COUNCIL MEETING TO SCHEDULED MEETINGS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT, THE CITY OF TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, AND THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY R:~,genda\072401 6 IEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETIN~ CALL TO ORDER: President Jeff Stone Next in Order: Ordinance: No. CSD 2001-01 Resolution: No. CSD 2001-15 ROLL CALL: DIRECTORS: PUBLIC COMMENTS Comerchero, Naggar, Pratt, Roberts, Stone A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Board of Directors on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you decide to speak to the Board of Directors on an item not on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should ~e filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk Prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors should present a completed pink "Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address for the record. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 2 1.1 Approve the minutes of June 26, 2001. Financial Statements for the nine months ended March 31,2001 RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Receive and file the Financial Statements for the nine months ended March 31, 2001. 3 Arts Council Community Grant A,qreement RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Approve the Community Grant Agreement between the Temecula Community Services District(TCSD) and the Ads Council of Temecula Valleyin the amount of $40,000. R:~Agenda\072401 7 DEPARTMENTAL REPORT DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT BOARD OF DIRECTORS' REPORTS ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: Tuesday, August 14, 2001, 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. R:~Agenda\072401 8 Next in Order: Ordinance: No. RDA 2001-01 Resolution: No. RDA 200%0,5 CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Ron Roberts ROLL CALL AGENCY MEMBERS: PUBLIC COMMENTS Comerchero, Naggar, Pratt, Stone, Roberts A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Redevelopment Agency on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you decide to speak to the Board of Directors on an item not on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk Prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors should present a completed pink "Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address for the record. CONSENT CALENDAR I Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of June 26, 2001. Financial Statements for the nine months ended March 31, 2001 RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Receive and file the Financial Statements for the nine months ended March 31, 2001. DEPARTMENTAL REPORT EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT AGENCY MEMBERS' REPORTS R:~Agenda\072401 9 ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: Tuesday, August 14, 2001, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. R:~Agenda\072401 10 INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Next in Order: Ordinance: No. IDA 2001-01 Resolution: No. IDA 2001-01 CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson ROLL CALL AUTHORITY MEMBERS: Naggar, Pratt, Roberts, Stone, and Comerchero PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Redevelopment Agency on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you decide to speak to the Authority Members on an item not on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk prior to the Authority Members addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. Anyone wishing to address the Authority Members should present a completed pink "Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and ~tate your name and address for the recorrt. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 2 1.1 Approve the minutes of January 13, 1998. Amendment of Documents related to industrial Development Revenue Bonds fo~ Tension Envelope Corporation RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Adopt the resolution entitled: R:~Agenda~072401 11 RESOLUTION IDA NO. 01-. A RESOLUTION OF THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF AMENDMENTS TO DOCUMENTS RELATED TO INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT REVENUE BONDS FOR TENSION ENVELOPE CORPORATION EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT AUTHORITY MEMBERS' REPORT,':; ADJOURNMENT R:~Agenda\072401 12 RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before a public Hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the Approval of the project(s) at the time of the hearing. If you challenge any of the project(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing. 21 Harv~ RECOMMENDATION: 21.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 01 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA CERTIFYING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT PREPARED FOR THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN AND RELATED ACTIONS, AND ADOPTING THE FINDINGS PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS, AND A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM IN CONNECTION THEREWITH FOR THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED EAST OF INTERSTATE 15, NORTH OF SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK, WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD AND SOUTH OF THE NORTHERN CITY LIMITS (PLANNING APPLICATION 00-0189) 21.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 0l- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 99- 0419 (GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT) FOR THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN AND THE TWO EXCLUDED PARCELS WITHIN THE SPECIFIC PLAN AND ADOPTING SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 13 (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 99-0418) ON PARCELS TOTALING 650 ACRES LOCATED EAST OF INTERSTATE 15, NORTH OF SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK, WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD AND SOUTH OF THE NORTHERN CITY LIMIT, AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NOS. 910-261-001, 910-261-002, 910-110-013, 910- 110-015, 910-110-020, 910-110-021, 910-110-027, 910-110-076, 910-100-007, 910-100-008, 910-060-009, 910-120-005, 910-120- 007, 910-120-008, 911-630-001,911-630-002, 911-630-003, 911- 640-001, 911-640-002, 911-180-002, 911-180-003, 911-180-004, 911-180-008, 911-180-009, 911-180-015, 911-180-023, AND 911- 180-028 R:~Agenda\072401 13 21.3 Read by title only and introduce an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 01t AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, AMENDING THE DEVELOPMENT CODE TO AMEND SECTION 17.16.070 TO INCLUDE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 13 AND ADOPTING A PORTION OF CHAPTER 11 (DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS) ZONING STANDARDS CONTAINED THEREIN FOR RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT FOR THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 13, ON PARCELS TOTALING APPROXIMATELY 550 ACRES LOCATED ON THE EAST OF INTERSTATE 15, NORTH OF SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK, WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD AND SOUTH OF THE NORTHERN CITY LIMIT, AND FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NOS. 910-261-001,910-261-002, 910-110- 013, 9 10-110-015, 9t0-110-020, 910-110-021,910-110-027, 910- 110-076, 910-100-007, 910-100-008, 910-060-009, 910-120-008, 911-630-001, 911-630-002, 911-630-003, 911-640-001, 911-640- 002, 911-180-002, 911-180-003, 911-180-004, 911-180-008, 911- 180-009, 911-180-015, 911-180-023 AND 9t1-180-02 (PLANNING APPLICATION 99-0418) 21.4 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 01-. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE ZONE CHANGE FOR THE AREA OF THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN AND AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ON PARCELS TOTALING 550 ACRES LOCATED ADJACENT TO INTERSTATE 15, NORTH OF SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK, WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD AND SOUTH OF THE NORTHERN CITY LIMIT, AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NOS. 910-261-001, 910-261-002, 910-110-013, 910- 110-015, 910-110-020, 910-1t0-021, 910-110-027, 910-110-076, 910-100-007, 910-100-008, 910-050-009, 910-120-003, 910-120- 007, 910-120-008, 911-630-001,911-630-002, 911-630-003, 911- 640-001, 911-640-002, 911-180-002, 911-180-003, 911-180-004, 911-180-008, 911-180-009, 911-180-015, 911-180-023 AND 911- 180-028. (PLANNING APPLICATION 99-0245) 21.5 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: R:~Agenda\072401 14 ORDINANCE NO. 01- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THAT CERTAIN AGREEMENT ENTITLED "DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND LENNAR COMMUNITIES (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 99-0446)" 21.6 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 01- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 00- 0295 - TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 29639, THE SUBDIVISION OF APPROXIMATELY 550 ACRES INTO 91 LOTS WHICH CONFORM TO THE PLANNING AREAS, OPEN SPACE AREAS, SCHOOL AND PARK SITES OF THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN LOCATED EAST OF INTERSTATE 15, NORTH OF SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK, WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD AND SOUTH OF THE NORTHERN CITY LIMIT, AND FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NOS. 910- 261-001, 9t0-261-002, 910-110-013, 910-110-015, 910-110-020, 910-110-021, 910-110-027, 910-110-076, 910-100-007, 910-100- 008, 910-060-009, 910-120-008, 911-630-001,911-630-002, 911- 630-003, 911-640-001, 911-640-002, 911-180-002, 911-180-003, 911-180-004, 911-180-008, 911-180-009, 911-180-015, 911-180- 023 AND 911-180-028 21.7 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 01-. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 01- 0030 - TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 29928, THE SUBDIVISION OF APPROXIMATELY 40 ACRES INTO 140 RESIDENTIAL LOTS AND 21 OPEN SPACE LOTS IN PLANNING AREA 7 OF THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN; LOCATED EAST OF INTERSTATE 15, NORTH OF SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK, WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD AND SOUTH OF THE NORTHERN CITY LIMIT, AND FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NOS. 911-180-003, 911-180-004, 911-640- 001 AND 911-630~003 21.8 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 01- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 01- 0031 - TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 29929, THE SUBDIVISION OF APPROXIMATELY 20 ACRES INTO 118 RESIDENTIAL R:~,genda\072401 15 LOTS AND 3 OPEN SPACE LOTS IN A PORTION OF PLANNING AREAS 3 AND 4 OF THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN; LOCATED EAST OF INTERSTATE 15, NORTH OF SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK, WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD AND SOUTH OF THE NORTHERN CITY LIMIT, AND FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NOS. 910-261-001, 910- 261-002, 91%180-002, 911-180-003, 911-180-004 AND 911-180- 015 21.9 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 01- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 01- 0032 - TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 30088, THE SUBDIVISION OF APPROXIMATELY 9.18 ACRES INTO 38 RESIDENTIAL LOTS AND 8 OPEN SPACE LOTS IN A PORTION OF PLANNING AREA 4 OF THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN; LOCATED EAST OF INTERSTATE 15, NORTH OF SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK, WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD AND SOUTH OF THE NORTHERN CITY LIMIT, AND FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NOS. 911-630-001, 911- 630-002 AND 91t-180-015 COUNCIL BUSINESS 22 Compensation for Commission Membem (as requested by Mayor Pro Tem Roberts) RECOMMENDATION: 22.1 Consider amending Section 2.40.100 of the City's Municipal Code to provide compensation to Commission Members on a per-meeting basis and provide direction to staff. 23 Appointment of an Animal Shelter Subcommitton (as requested by Councilman Naggar) RECOMMENDATION: 23.1 Appoint a subcommittee to review the Animal Friends of the Valley proposed new shelter. DEPARTMENTAL REPORTR CITY MANAGER'S REPORT CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT ADJOURNMENT R:~Agenda~072401 16 Next regular meeting: City Council, Tuesday, August 14, 2001, at 7:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. R:~Agenda\072401 17 ITEM 1 ITEM 2 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL JUNE 26, 200t The City Council convened in Closed Session at 5:30 P.M., on Tuesday, June 26, 2001, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. The Open Session of the City Council meeting commenced at 7:00 P.M. Present: Councilmembers: Naggar, Pratt, Roberts, Stone, Comerchero Absent: Councilmember: None PRELUDE MUSIC The prelude music was provided by Natalie and Tiffany Zita. INVOCATION The invocation was given by Councilman Naggar. ALLEGIANCE The salute to the Flag was led by Mayor Pro Tem Roberts. PUBLIC COMMENTS A. Addressing the Wolf Creek referendum, Mr. Chris Pedersen, 31052 Wellington Circle, questioned the City's position to file a brief in opposition to the motion and, thereby, in his opinion, arguing against the citizens of Temecula and questioned who is directing the City Attorney with regard to this issue. Noting that he does not recall providing direction to the City Attorney with regard to the Wolf Creek referendum, Councilman Naggar commented on the City's position with regard to this matter. In response to Councilman Naggar, Mayor Comerchero noted that, to his recollection, the matter is not one to be decided by the City Council. Further clarifying the issue, City Attorney Thorson advised that under the Elections Code, the City Clerk is the designated elections official and as well is required to make a decision as to whether or not the petition filed conforms to the requirements of the Elections Code; that the City Clerk performed those requirements based on his advise which was based on the Code and cases interpreting the Code; that at this point in time, the City Clerk is not only being sued by Mr. Pedersen but also by the developer; that the Court has ordered to allow the signatures to be counted by the Registrar of Voters in an effort to not impede the process of placing the matter on the November 6, 2001, ballot if it were determined that the referendum were valid; and that the Court has not ruled with respect to the merits. In response to Councilman Naggar, City Attorney Thorson advised that if the City were to withdraw its opposition at this point in time, the developer would continue to sue the City Clerk and the issue of the merits of the case would be decided. R:\Minutes\062601 1 B. Expressing their great sorrow with regard to the loss of their 8-year old son, Dylan, Mr. and Mrs. Lance and Suzanne Cacaninion, 40132 Villa Venecia, commented on their son's recent accident on Winchester Road at Nicolas Road and discussed the potential of constructing a pedestrian bridge on Winchester Road in an effort to prevent future tragedies such as theirs and thanked the City Council for forwarding the matter to the Public/Traffic Safety Commission for review. On behalf of the City Council, staff, and citizens, Mayor Comerchero relayed his deepest thoughts and prayers to the Cacaninion family and noted that if the City were able to obtain the approvals necessary to construct this bridge, he would request that the bridge be named Dylan's Bridge. Mr. and Mrs. Cacaninion voiced no opposition. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS A. Councilman Pratt requested that the following three items be agendized for the July 10, 2001, City Council meeting: Regional Transportation Model, Design and Construction of a new City Hall site, and City Council term limits. B. Having attended a recent Urban Storm Water Conference, Councilman Naggar requested that staff review the City's Best Management Practices and agendize the matter within the next 30 to 45 days. C. Councilman Naggar advised that Supervisor Buster, Councilman Pratt, Deputy Director of Community Services Ruse, and he had visited a transitional shelter in the City of Indio, noting that he was impressed with the operations of this facility. D. Mayor Pro Tem Roberts informed the City Council and viewing public that Mr. Randy Howe of Howe's Welding cleaned the brass work on the Old Town gateway arches, at no charge to the City, for the Fourth of July Celebration. Mr. Roberts extended his appreciation to Mr. Howe. E. Mayor Pro Tem Roberts apprised the public of the upcoming Summer Nights in O/d Town events, starting July 6, 2001, every Friday, 5:00 PM. to 9:00 P.M., through September 28, 2001. F. Advising that he is, through Riverside County Transportation Committee, participating in discussions with regard to Measure A Safes Tax Extension, Mayor Pro Tern Roberts noted that the Measure A Sales Tax expires in 2008 and that he would keep the City apprised of the outcome. G. Requesting that the Temeku Hills speed limit matter be agendized for an upcoming City Council meeting, Councilman Stone as well requested that prior to the City Council meeting, the Police Department place a traffic trailer at various sites in Temeku Hills. H. Appreciating the attendance of Mr. and Mrs. Cacaninion (Dylan's parents), Councilman Stone relayed his commitment to ensure everything possible will be undertaken to prevent a future calamity such as theirs. I. With regard to Councilman Pratt's request of agendized items, Councilman Stone noted the following: · Regional Transportation Model - suggested that the matter be agendized for Councilman Pratt's input after which City Council be given the opportunity to provide further direction as to whether or not to invest staff resources; R:\Minutes\062601 2 · City Hall site - no objection to agendizing the matter in order to receive Councilman Pratt's input but to not expend too much staff time until full direction of the City Council has been provided; · City Council term limits - no objection to agendizing the matter but would not support expending a significant amount of time on the issue until full direction of the City Council has been provided. Commenting on the positive effects of the newly opened Arizona crossing (Via Montezuma), Councilman Stone as well commented on the Overland Overcrossing, noting that traffic conveniences have been made for the community. J. Advising that as of July 1, 2001, the Vail Ranch residents will be part of the City, Mayor Comerchero invited the public to the Annexation Celebration on Sunday, July 1, 2001. K. Having had the privilege of representing the City of Temecula at the U.S. Conference of Mayors in Detroit, Mayor Comerchero commented on President Bush's clarification with regard to faith-based initiatives (proposing money allocated toward social services not religious services) and his request to Congress to allocate $8 million for such initiatives. In light of President Bush's clarification, Mayor Comerchero relayed support of the issue. CONSENTCALENDAR Standard Ordinance and Resolution Adoption Procedure RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. 2 Minutes 3 RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the minutes of April 24, 2001; 2.2 Approve the minutes of May 15, 2001; 2.3 Approve the minutes of May 22, 2001. Resolution approving List of Demands RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 0t-$8 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A R:\Minutes\062601 3 4 6 7 Upgrade of Financial Accounting Software RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Approve a Software License and Use Agreement with Eden Systems, inc. in the amount of $144,050; 4.2 Authorize the City Manager to approve contract amendments in an amount not to exceed $14,405 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount; 4.3 Authorize the City Manager and City Attorney to execute all necessary agreements. Purchase of a Postage Meter Machine RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Approve the purchase of Pitney Bowes Postage Meter in the amount of $14,670.00. Records Destruction Approval RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Approve the scheduled destruction of certain City records in accordance with the City of Temecula approved Records Retention Policy. Riverside County Library Contract Amendment No. 4 RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Approve Amendment No. 4 to the Agreement to provide Library Services (additional staff); 7.2 Authorize the expenditure of an amount not to exceed $150,000 to fund the Temecula Library Volunteer Coordinator half-time position and to subsidize funding to maintain the Senior Reference Librarian and Reference Librarian positions for fiscal year 2001-02. Second Amendment to the Uniforms, Floor Mats, Oust Mops, and Towels Service Agreement with AmeriPride Uniform Services - FY2001-02 RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 Approve Amendment No. 2 with AmeriPride Uniform Services which will exercise the City's option for a second one-year extension of the Agreement and, thereby, extending the Agreement through June 30, 2002; 8.2 Authorize the expenditure of funds in the amount of $10,550.00 for uniform, floor mats, dust mops, and towel services. R:\Minutes\062601 4 9 Third Amendment to the HVAC Preventative Maintenance Agreement with Kinetics Service Company for FY2001-02 RECOMMENDATION: 9.1 Approve Amendment No. 3 to the HVAC Preventative Maintenance Agreement with Kinetics Service Company to exercise the City's option for a one-year extension and, thereby, extending the Agreement through June 30, 2002; 9.2 Authorize the expenditure of funds in the amount of $30,640.00 for preventative maintenance services, repairs, and extra work items for Fiscal Year 2001-02. 10 Agreement for Weed Abatement Services between the City of Temecula and A.S.A.P. Services RECOMMENDATION: 10.1 Approve the contract with A.S.A.P. Services for Weed Abatement Services for a total of $26,250.00. 11 A.qreement for Weed Abatement Services between the City of Temecula and Rory Rieck and Chuck Maciel Weed Abatement RECOMMENDATION: 11.1 Approve the contract with Rory Rieck and Chuck Maciel's Weed Abatement for Weed Abatement Services for a total of $26,250.00. 12 A.qreement for Consu t n,q Services between the City of Temecula and PELA RECOMMENDATION: 12.1 Approve the contract with PELA for landscape plan check and inspection services in the amount of $98,500.00. 13 Authorize Temporary Street Closure of Old Town Front Street between Moreno Road and Second Street; Main Street from the brid.qe to Old Town Front Street; Second Street; Third Street; Fourth Street; Fifth Street; and Sixth Street for the Star Spangled Fourth of July Parade and delegate authority to issue Special Events/Street Closures Permit to Director of Public Works/City Engineer RECOMMENDATION: 13.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: R:\Minutes\062601 5 RESOLUTION NO. 01-59 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AUTHORIZING TEMPORARY STREET CLOSURE OF OLD TOWN FRONT STREET BETWEEN MORENO ROAD AND SECOND STREET; MAIN STREET FROM THE BRIDGE TO OLD TOWN FRONT STREET; SECOND STREET; THIRD STREET; FOURTH STREET; FIFTH STREET; SIXTH STREET FOR THE STAR SPANGLED FOURTH OF JULY PARADE AND AUTHORIZING THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER TO ISSUE SPECIAL EVENTS PERMIT INCLUDING STREET CLOSURES 14 Authorize Temporary Street Closure of Pauba Road between Margarita Road and Ynez Road for the July 4th, 2001, Fireworks Show and delegate authority to issue Special Events/Street Closures Permit to Director of Public Works/City Engineer RECOMMENDATION: 14.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 01-60 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AUTHORIZING TEMPORARY STREET CLOSURE OF PAUBA ROAD BETWEEN MARGARITA ROAD AND YNEZ ROAD FOR THE JULY 4TM, 2001, FIREWORKS SHOW AND AUTHORIZING THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER TO ISSUE SPECIAL EVENTS PERMIT INCLUDING STREET CLOSURES 15 Parcel Map No. 29438 (located at Enterprise Circle South) RECOMMENDATION: 15.1 Approve Parcel Map No. 29438 in conformance with the Conditions of Approval. 16 Acceptance of Offer of Dedication - Road Purposes on Western Bypass Corridor and Roick Drive per Tentative Parcel Map No. 28473 Conditions of Approval RECOMMENDATION: 16.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: R:'~linutes\062601 6 ITEM 3 RESOLUTION NO. 01- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A, on file in the Office of the City Clerk, have been audited by the City Manager, and that the same are hereby allowed in the amount of $3,009,550.08. Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 24th day of July, 2001. ATTEST: Jeff Comerchero, Mayor Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] R:/Resos2001/Resos 01- 1 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 01 - was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 24th day of July, 2001 by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk R:/Resos2001/Resos 01- 2 CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS 07/05/01 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 07/12/01 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 07/24/01 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 07/05/01 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN: TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 0712aj01 COUNCIL MEETING: DI8BURSEMENT8 BY FUND: CHECKS: 001 165 190 192 163 194 210 280 300 ~0 330 340 471 GENERAL FUND RDA-LOW/MOD INCOME HOUSING COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ. FUND CFD 88-12 ADMIN EXPENSE FUND RDA-REDEVELOPMENT INSURANCE INFORMATION SYSTEMS SUPPORT SERVICES FACILITIES CFD 98-1 ADMIN EXPENSE FUND 001 165 190 192 193 194 ?90 300 330 33O 340 GENERAL FUND RDA-LOW/MOD INCOME HOUSING COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT TCSD SERVICE LEVEL S TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D RDA-REDEVELOPMENT INSURANCE INFORMATION SYSTEMS SUPPORT SERVICES FACILITIES TOTAL BY FUND: PREPARED BY RETA WESTON, ACCOUNTING SPECIALIST TIM~AS~AN C E DIRECTOR I ~'-~-~,[,~ I,~ ~ ! \ ~ ~. SHAW'J[/NELSON, CiTY MANAGER $ 228,277.23 556,967.27 1,985,879.91 238,435.67 $ 3,009,500.00 1,703,795.30 19,744.23 266,963.28 48.07 50,593.91 1,175.04 665,923.26 8,000.00 11,964.89 4,684.65 19,032.34 4,226.05 17,223.39 2,750.00 158,327.27 3,874.33 57,573.16 58.09 2,889.56 514.92 1,939.25 786.09 6,631.17 1,971.89 31869.94 $ 2,771,124.41 238,435.67 $_ 3,000,500.~ , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. VOUCNRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 11 07/05/01 10:35 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 165 RDA OEV- LO~/HOD SET ASIDE 190 COHMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 210 CAPITAL IHPROVENENT PROJ FUND 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - 300 INSURANCE FUND 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 340 FACILITIES AMOUNT 141,207.69 3,380.92 46,838.5? 47.01 2,379.58 427.28 10,108.48 2,871.59 420.14 5,940.27 1,351.93 13,303.TT TOTAL 228,2T/.23 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 07/05/01 10:35 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION 38884 07/05/01 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 38884 07/05/01 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 38884 07/05/01 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 38884 07/05/01 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 38884 07/05/01 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEESf RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 38884 07/05/01 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 38884 07/05/01 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 38884 07/05/01 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PRES RET 38884 07/05/01 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 38884 07/05/01 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 38884 07/05/01 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 38884 07/05/01 000246 PRES (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 38884 07/05/01 000246 PRES (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS-PRE 38884 07/05/01 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 38884 07/05/01 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 38884 07/05/01 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 38884 07/05/01 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 38884 07/05/01 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 38884 07/05/01 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 38884 07/05/01 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 38884 07/05/01 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 38884 07/05/01 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 38884 07/05/01 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 38884 07/05/01 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 38996 07/05/01 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA 58996 07/05/01 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA 38996 07/05/01 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA 38996 07/05/01 000245 PERS (NEALTR INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA 38996 07/05/01 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA 38996 07/05/01 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA 38996 07/05/01 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 BLSHIELD 38996 07/05/01 000245 PRES (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 BLSHIELD 38996 07/05/01 000245 PRES (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 CIGNA 38996 07/05/01 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET 38996 07/05/01 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET 38996 07/05/01 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET 38996 07/05/01 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET 38996 07/05/01 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET 38996 07/05/01 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 KAISER 38996 07/05/01 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PACCARE 38996 07/05/01 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PACCARE 38996 07/05/01 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PACCARE 38996 07/05/01 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PACCARE 38996 07/05/01 000245 PERS (REALTR IRSUR. PRE 000245 PC 38996 07/05/01 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS CHO 38996 07/05/01 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS CHO 38996 07/05/01 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS CHO 38996 07/05/01 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PRES DED 38996 07/05/01 000245 PERS (HEALTR INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS-ADM 38996 07/05/01 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 UNI ACCOUNT HUMBER 001-2390 165-2390 190-2390 192-2390 193-2390 194-2390 280-2390 300'2390 320-2130 320-2390 330'2390 340-2390 001-2130 001-2390 165-2390 190-2390 192-2390 193-2390 194-2390 280-2390 300-2390 320-2390 330-2390 340-2390 001-2090 165-2090 190-2090 280-2090 330-2090 340-2090 001-2090 190-2090 001-2090 001-2090 190-2090 193-2090 194-2090 340-2090 001-2090 001-2090 190-2090 193-2090 340-2090 001-2090 001-2090 190-2090 280-2090 001-2090 001-2090 001-2090 ITEM ,AMOUNT 26,286.82 651.49 4,887.42 11.61 415.42 101.44 282.59 131.68 26.51 1,083.44 206.19 589.34 182.91 95.66 1.87 19.07 .05 1.82 .36 .92 .46 3.72 1.39 2.65 3,042.39 254.63 1,142.00 84.87 97.00 244.06 1,594.12 468.53 926.50 4,806.83 1,438.36 59.18 29.59 768.95 2,847.96 4~638.41 958.01 244.62 144.45 738.00 4,051.47 3.82 1.15 977.11 7v866.63- 2,037.16 PAGE I CHECK AMOUNT 34,984.83 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 2 07/05/01 10:35 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 38996 38996 38996 38996 38996 38996 38996 38996 38996 38996 38996 38996 38996 38996 38996 38996 38996 70084 70085 CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION 07/05/01 07/05/01 07/05/01 07/05/01 07/05/01 07/05/01 07/05/01 07/05/01 07/05/01 07/05/01 07/05/01 07/05/01 07/05/01 07/05/01 07/05/01 07/05/01 07/05/01 06/28/01 07/02/01 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 UNI 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA 000245 PERS (HEALTH IHSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 AETNA 000245 PERS (HEALTH IRSUR. PRE 000245 SLSHIELD 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 BLSHIELD 000245 PERS (HEALTH IHSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHNET 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 HELTHMET 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 KAISER 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PACCARE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PACCARE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PACCARE 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS CHO 000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PRE 000245 PERS REV OLIVERA~S BAKERY 003710 RIVERA, FRED REFRESHMNTS:VAIL RANCH ANNEX. ENTERTAIRMERT:4TH OF JULY ACCOUNT NUMBER 190-2090 001-2090 165-2090 190-2090 280-2090 340-2090 001-2090 190-2090 001-2090 190-2090 340-2090 001-2090 001-2090 190-2090 340-2090 001-2090 001-2090 190-183-999-5370 190-183-999-5370 ITEM AMOUNT 166.98 158.61 123.68 119.00 41.22 8.14 55.47 54.51 140.69 31.23 .37 23.43 119.46 18.59 2.32 93.56 990.28~ 74.95 600.00 746919 07/05/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 001-2070 25,301.53 746919 07/05/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 165-2070 463.80 746919 07/05/01 000283 %NSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 190-2070 7,938.79 746919 07/05/01 000283 IRSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 192-2070 16.59 746919 07/05/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 193-2070 355.89 746919 07/05/01 000283 ]HSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 194-2070 131.37 746919 07/05/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 280-2070 183.16 746919 07/05/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 300-2070 78.30 746919 07/05/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 320-2070 1,160.54 746919 07/05/01 000283 ]NSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 330-2070 267.28 746919 07/05/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 340-2070 450.60 746919 07/05/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000285 MEDICARE 001-2070 6,064.74 746919 07/05/01 000283 ]RSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 165-2070 151.04 746919 07/05/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 190-2070 2,093.24 746919 07/05/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 192-2070 2.62 746919 07/05/01 000283 IMSTATAX (IRS) 0002~3 MEDICARE 193-2070 102.74 746919 07/05/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 194-2070 22.28 746919 07/05/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 280-2070 68.95 746919 07/05/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 300-2070 30.03 746919 07/05/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 320-2070 281.42 746919 07/05/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 330-2070 71.23 746919 07/05/01 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 00028~ MEDICARE 340-2070 137.59 746991 07/05/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 746991 07/05/01 000444 IRSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 746991 07/05/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 746991 07/05/01 000444 IRSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SD/ 746991 07/05/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 746991 07/05/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 001-2070 165-2070 190-2070 193-2070 280-2070 320-2070 103.27 3.66 301.06 2.24 .76 9.05 CHECK AMOUNT 23,899.52 74.95 600.00 45,373.73 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 3 07/05/01 10:35 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PEHIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK HUMBER CHECK VENDOR VENDOR DATE NUMBER NAME ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM CHECK DESCRIPTION HUMBER AMOUNT AMOUNT 746991 07/05/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 330-2070 7.56 746991 07/05/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 340-2070 4.18 746991 07/05/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 001-2070 6,795.39 746991 07/05/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 165-2070 131.26 746991 07/05/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 190-2070 1,546.32 746991 07/05/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 192-2070 5.18 746991 07/05/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 193-2070 82.59 746991 07/05/01 000444 INSTATAX (EOD) 000444 STATE 194-2070 40.21 746991 07/05/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 280-2070 53.71 746991 07/05/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 300-2070 16.41 746991 07/05/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 320-2070 250.65 746991 07/05/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 330-2070 59.41 746991 07/05/01 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 340-2070 90.49 70088 07/05/01 003552 A F L A C 003552 CANCER 001-2330 357.70 70088 07/05/01 003552 A F L A C 003552 CANCER 190-2330 14.34 70088 07/05/01 003552 A F L A C 003552 CANCER 193-2330 14.34 70088 07/05/01 003552 A F L A C 003552 CANCER 194-2330 4.78 70088 07/05/01 003552 A F L A C 003552 CANCER 340-2330 14.34 70088 07/05/01 003552 A F L A C 003552 EXP PROT 001-2330 128.30 70088 07/05/01 003552 A F L A C 003552 EXP PROT 190-2330 55.80 70088 07/05/01 003552 A F L A C 003552 EXP PROT 320-2330 27.90 70088 07/05/01 003552 A F L A C 003552 HOSP IC 001-2330 17.50 70088 07/05/01 003552 A F L A C 003552 STD 001-2330 566.40 70088 07/05/01 003552 A F L A C 003552 STD 190-2330 155.20 70088 07/05/01 003552 A F L A C 003552 STD 193-2330 9.60 70088 07/05/01 003552 A F L A C 003552 STD 194-2330 3.20 70088 07/05/01 003552 A F L A C 003552 STD 340-2330 20.80 70089 70090 70091 70091 70091 70091 70091 70091 70091 70091 07/05/01 004148 A T & T 07/05/01 000745 A T & T WIRELESS SERVIC LONG DISTANCE CHARGES:POLICE 001-170-999-5208 CELLULAR PHONE SVCS:POLICE DPT 001-170-999-5208 70092 7O093 70093 70093 215.34 07/05/01 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 001-2310 706.03 07/05/01 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 165-2310 17.60 07/05/01 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 190-2310 89.03 07/05/01 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 193-2310 5.58 07/05/01 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 194-2310 1.68 07/05/01 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 280-2310 5.86 07/05/01 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 330-2310 5.58 07/05/01 000116 A V P VISION PLANS 000116 AVP 340-2310 42.23 BILLBOARD SIGN:SUMMER NIGHTS 280-199-999-5250 BOTTLED WATER SVCS:MNTG FAC BOTTLED WATER SVCS:CRG BOTTLED WATER SVCS:CITY HALL 340-199-702-5250 190-182-999-5250 340-199-701-5250 07/05/01 003304 ADAMS ADVERTISING INC 07/05/01 001323 ARROWHEAD WATER INC 07/05/01 001323 ARROWHEAD WATER 07/05/01 001323 ARROWHEAD WATER INC 450.00 117.07 68.36 260.13 9,503.40 1,390.20 13.78 215.34 873.59 450.00 445.56 100.00 70094 07/05/01 BERNA, KELLI REFUND:SECURITY DPST MS01-0128 190-2900 100.00 70095 07/05/01 004040 BIG FOOT GRAPHICS LOGO FOR STAFF SWEATSHIRTS 190-180-999-5243 40.00 VOUCNRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 4 07/05/01 10:35 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOURT 70095 07/05/01 004040 BIG FOOT GRAPHICS LOGO FOR STAFF SWEATSHIRTS 190-180-999-5243 600.00 640.00 70096 07/05/01 003553 70096 07/05/01 003553 70096 07/05/01 003553 70096 07/05/01 003553 70096 07/05/01 003553 70096 07/05/01 003553 70096 07/05/01 003553 70096 07/05/01 003553 70096 07/05/01 003553 70096 07/05/01 003553 70096 07/05/01 003553 70096 07/05/01 003553 70096 07/05/01 003553 70096 07/05/01 003553 70096 07/05/01 003553 70096 07/05/01 003553 70096 07/05/01 003553 70096 07/05/01 003553 70096 07/05/01 003553 70096 07/05/01 003553 70096 07/05/01 003553 70096 07/05/01 003553 C GNA C GNA C GNA C GNA C GNA C GNA C GNA C GNA C GNA C GNA GNA C GNA C GNA C GNA C GNA C GNA C GNA C GNA C GNA GNA C GNA C GNA 003553 LTD 001-2380 1,576.04 003553 LTD 165-2380 39.10 003553 LTD 190-2380 299.92 003553 LTD 192-2380 .71 003553 LTD 193-2380 26.38 003553 LTD 194-2380 6.08 003553 LTD 280-2380 17.29 003553 LTD 300-2380 7.99 003553 LTD 320-2380 66.99 003553 LTD 330-2380 13.45 003553 LTD 340-2380 37.67 003553 STD 001-2500 2,199.86 003553 STD 165-2500 54.57 003553 STD 190-2500 418.65 003553 STD 192-2500 .99 003553 STD 193-2500 36.81 003553 STO 194-2500 8.49 003553 STD 280-2500 24.15 003553 STD 300-2500 11.15 003553 STD 320-2500 93.49 003553 STD 330-2500 18.78 003553 STD 340-2500 52.59 5,011.15 70098 07/05/01 003549 CALIF ASSN OF MUSEUMS ANNUAL CONF:W.OTT:7/12-14/01 190-185-999-5258 310.00 310.00 70099 07/05/01 003549 CALIF ASSN OF MUSEUMS MEMBERSHIP: TEM VLLY MUSEUM 190-185-999-5226 100.00 100.00 70100 07/05/01 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 AD&D 001-2360 145.88 70100 07/05/01 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 ADgD 165-2360 3.01 70100 07/05/01 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 AD&D 190-2360 30.76 70100 07/05/01 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 AD&D 192-2360 .08 70100 07/05/01 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 AD&D 193-2360 2.93 70100 07/05/01 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 AD&D 194-2360 .59 70100 07/05/01 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 AD&D 280-2360 1.49 70100 07/05/01 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 AD&D 300-2360 .74 70100 07/05/01 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 AD&D 320-2360 6.00 70100 07/05/01 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 AD&D 330-2360 2.25 70100 07/05/01 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 AD&D 340-2360 4.27 70100 07/05/01 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 001-2360 632.13 70100 07/05/01 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE IRS 165-2360 13.01 70100 07/05/01 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 190-2360 133.26 70100 07/05/01 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 192-2360 .33 70100 07/05/01 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 193-2360 12.68 70100 07/05/01 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE IRS 194-2360 2.59 70100 07/05/01 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE IRS 280-2360 6.49 70100 07/05/01 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE IRS 300-2360 3.24 70100 07/05/01 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 320-2360 26.00 70100 07/05/01 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 330-2360 9.75 70100 07/05/01 003554 CANADA LIFE ASSURANCE C 003554 LIFE INS 340-2360 18.52 1,056.00 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 07/05/01 10:35 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE 5 VOUCHER/ CRECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER 70101 07/05/01 004093 CARDIO CARE PLUS 70102 07/05/01 CENTER FOR TECHNOLOGY TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 ANNUAL CONF:9/17-19/O1:DOMENOE 001-170-999-5261 ITEM AMOUNT 403.20 200.00 70103 07/05/01 004405 COMMUNITY HEALTH CHARIT 004405 CHC 001-2120 123.50 70103 07/05/01 004405 COMMUNITY HEALTH CHARIT 004405 CHC 190-2120 5.60 70103 07/05/01 004405 COMMUNITY HEALTH CHARIT 004405 CHC 193-2120 .60 70103 07/05/01 004405 COMMUNITY HEALTH CHARIT 004405 CHC 194-2120 .20 70103 07/05/01 004405 COMMUNITY HEALTH CNARIT 004405 CHC 330-2120 5.50 70103 07/05/01 004405 COMMUNITY HEALTH CHARIT 004405 CHC 340-2120 .60 70104 07/05/01 004250 CUSTOM GATE 70104 07/05/01 004250 CUSTOM GATE 70105 07/05/01 003272 DAISY WHEEL RIBBON COMP 70105 07/05/01 003272 DAISY WHEEL RIBBON COMP 70106 07/05/01 001393 DATA TICKET IN¢ 70107 07/05/01 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC 70107 07/05/01 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC 70108 07/05/01 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 70108 07/05/01 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 70108 07/05/01 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 70108 07/05/01 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 70108 07/05/01 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 70109 07/05/01 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC 70109 07/05/01 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC 70109 07/05/01 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC 70109 07/05/01 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC 70109 07/05/01 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS REPAIR:ENTRY GATE @ FIRE STN84 001-171-999-5212 REPAIR ENTRY CATE ~ STATION 84 001-171-999-5212 GIS PAPER/INK SUPPLIES GIS PAPER/INK SUPPLIES 001-161-610-5220 001'161-610-5220 001-170-999-5250 001~171-999-5118 001-171-999-5118 MAY PRKING CITATION PROCESSING TEMP HELP W/E 06/15 OBNANN TEMP HELP W/E 06/15 OBMANN APR LDSC IMPR:CTY HL/MNTC FAC 340-199-702-5415 APR LDSCP IMPR:DUCK POND SOD 190-180-999-5416 MAY LDSCP IMPR:MARTIHIQUE 190-180-999-5415 MAY LDSCP IMPR:SADDLEWOOD 190-180-999-5415 MAY LDSCP SVCS:OLD TWN PRKLOTB 001-164-603-5415 EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES EXPRESS NAIL SERVICES EXPRESS HAIL SERVICES XX-1405 UBNOSKE:PROF MTGS XX-1405 UBNOSKE:PROF MTGS 70110 07/05/01 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 70110 07/05/01 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 70111 07/05/01 002982 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD - W 002982 ST DED 70112 07/05/01 003640 GRAYNER ENGINEERING 001-140-999-5230 001-171-999-5230 001-162-999-5230 001-161-999-5230 001-150-999-5230 70113 07/05/01 004053 HABITAT WEST INC 001-161-999-5260 001-1990 190-2140 210-190-167-5802 210-165-631-5804 JUN SVCS:MERCANTILE BLDG FEB/MAR/APR PALA MNTC:PW97-15 HARDWARE SUPPLIES-PW MNTC HARDWARE SUPPLIES-TRAFFIC DIVI HARDWARE SUPPLIES:MUSEUM HARDWARE SUPPLIES:CRC HARDWARE SUPPLIES:TCSD MNTC HARDWARE SUPPLIES-BLDG&SAFETY HARDWARE SUPPLIES:SR CENTER HARDWARE SUPPLIES-PW MRTC 001-164-601-5218 001-164-602-5242 190-185~999-5212 190-182-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 001-162-999-5242 190-181-999-5212 001-164-601-5218 70114 07/05/01 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC 70114 07/05/01 000186 HANKS HARDWARE 70114 07/05/01 000186 HANKS NARDWARE INC 70114 07/05/01 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC 70114 07/05/01 000186 HARKS HARDNARE 70114 07/05/01 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC 70114 07/05/01 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC 70114 07/05/01 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC 122.00 491.00 1,000.00 317.78 23.00 1,320.00 200.80 528.00 3,250.00 91.23 271.61 250.00 14.83 25.19 76.87 27.16 12.92 112.46 40.78 155.53 4,365.64 2,025.00 83,33 59.59 269.20 85.47 25.54- 428.25 32.11 83.99 CHECK AMOUNT 403.20 200.00 136.00 613.00 1,317.78 23.00 1,520.80 4,390.84 156.97 153.24 155.53 4,365.64 2,025.00 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 6 07/05/01 10:35 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAHE 70114 07/05/01 000186 HANKS HARDNARE INC 70114 07/05/01 000185 HANKS RARD~ARE 70115 07/05/01 002107 NIGNMARK INC 70115 07/05/01 002107 HIGNMARK [NC 70115 07/05/01 002107 HIQHMARK 70115 07/05/01 002107 HIGHMARK INC 70115 07/05/01 002107 HIGNMARK 70115 07/05/01 002107 HIGHMARK 70115 07/05/01 002107 HIGHHARK INC 70115 07/05/01 002107 HIGHHARK INC 70115 07/05/01 002107 HIGH~L~RK 70115 07/05/01 002107 HIGHMARK INC 70115 07/05/01 002107 NIGHMARK 70115 07/05/01 002107 HIGHMARK INC 70115 07/05/01 002107 HIGHMARK 70115 07/05/01 002107 HIGNMARK INC 70116 07/05/01 004525 HUMAMSCALE 70117 07/05/01 000194 70117 07/05/01 000194 70117 07/05/01 000194 70117 07/05/01 000194 70117 07/05/01 000194 70117 07/05/01 000194 70118 07/05/01 70119 07/05/01 000750 70120 07/05/01 001186 70121 07/05/01 002140 ITEM DESCRIPTION HARDNARE SUPPLIES-PW INSPECTOR HARD~ARE SUPPLIES-LAND INSPECT 002107 VL ADVAN 002107 VOL LIFE 002107 VOL LIFE 002107 VOL LIFE 002107 VOL LIFE 002107 VOL LIFE 002107 VOL LIFE 002107 VL REVER 002107 VOL LIFE 002107 VOL LIFE 002107 VOL LIFE 002107 VOL LIFE 002107 VOL LIFE 002107 VOL LIFE ERGONOMIC KEYBOARD/MOUSE C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COHP C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP C M A RETIREMENT TRUS 000194 DEF COMP INNOVATIVE CAMPER SNELL INTOXIMETERS INC IRWIN, JOHN JAGUAR COMPUTER SYSTEMS 70122 07/05/01 JATC 70123 07/05/01 000210 LEAGUE OF CALIF CITIES 70124 07/05/01 003726 LIFE ASSIST INC 70125 07/05/01 70126 07/05/01 000996 LOCAL GOVERNMENT PUBLIC 002693 MATROS, ANDREA 70127 07/05/01 MAY, MARJAMNA E. 2 SRELL DOOR LOCKS:PRMS02 REPAIR POLICE ALCO-SENSOR IV TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS NETWORK EQUIPMENT MNTC/REPA[RS ENERGY COMM WRKSHP:M.H.:7/9-10 LEAGUE CF:HP/COMHISSIONERS UNIVERSAL RAIN SHEETS:MEDIC BOOK: CALIFORNIA LAND USE 2d TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-165-999-5242 001-163-999-5242 001-2510 001-2510 190-2510 193-2510 194-2510 300-2510 340-2510 001-2510 001-2510 190-2510 193-2510 194-2510 300-2510 340-2510 001-162-999-5220 001-2080 165-2080 190-2080 194-2080 280-2080 300-2080 190-180-999-5250 001-170-999-5215 190-183-999-5330 320-1~-999-5248 001-162-999-5261 190-180-999-5258 001-171-999-5311 001-161-999-5228 190-183-999-5330 REFUND:SEC.DEPOSIT:MS01-0937 190-2900 70128 07/05/01 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 DENTALML 70128 07/05/01 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 DEHTALML 70128 07/05/01 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 DENTALML 70128 07/05/01 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 005076 DENTALML 001-2340 165-2340 190-2340 193-2340 ITEM AMOUNT 59.52 107.74 225.15 204.65 11.87 2.22 .74 .80 4.87 225.15- 204.65 11.87 2.22 .74 .80 4.87 362.30 2,485.05 445.85 508.34 16.50 163.54 49.99 28.82 257.67 392.00 1,017.27 100.00 1,725.00 102.37 99.54 326.40 100.00 4,251.81 200.93 687.56 61.12 CHECK AMOUNT 1,183.66 450.30 362.30 3,669.27 28.82 257.67 392.00 1,017.27 100.00 1,725.00 102.37 99.54 326.40 100.00 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 7 07/03/01 10:35 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 70128 70128 70128 70128 70129 70129 70130 70131 70132 70133 70133 70133 70134 70135 70135 70135 70135 70136 70137 7O138 70138 70138 70138 70138 70138 70138 70138 70138 70138 70138 70138 70138 70138 70138 70138 70138 70138 70138 70138 70138 70138 CHECK VENDOR VENDOR DATE NUMBER NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION 07/05/01 003076 MET LIFE ]NSURAMCE COMP 003076 DENTALML 07/05/01 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 DENTALML 07/05/01 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 DENTALML 07/05/01 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMP 003076 DENTALML 07/05/01 001905 MEYERS, DAVID WILLIAM 07/05/01 001905 MEYERS, DAVID WILLIAM 07/05/01 MEYERS, MICHELE 07/05/01 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS 07/05/01 OLOMI, GUILLERMINA 07/05/01 003762 P M X MEDICAL SPECIALTY 07/05/01 003762 P M X MEDICAL SPECIALTY 07/05/01 003762 P M X MEDICAL SPECIALTY 07/05/01 004520 PAINT CONNECTION, THE TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS REFUND:EXERCISE-BELLY DANCING ENVELOPES FOR MUSEUM REFUND:PICNIC SHELTER PARAMEDIC SQUAD SUPPLIES PARAMEDIC SQUAD SUPPLIES PARAMEDIC SQUAD SUPPLIES RES IMPRV PRGM: GRUNAVER 07/05/01 003955 PANE CONSULTING SERVICE BADGES-MUSEUM REC SUPPLIES 07/05/01 003955 PANE CONSULTING SERVICE ENGRAVING PLATE 07/05/01 003955 PANE CONSULTING SERVICE FREIGHT 07/05/01 003955 PANE CONSULTING SERVICE SALES TAX 07/05/01 001958 PERS LONG TERM CARE PRO 001958 PERB L-T 07/05/01 000247 PESTMASTER 07/05/01 000249 PETTY CASH 07/05/01 000249 PETTY CASH 07/05/01 000249 PETTY CASH 07/05/01 000249 PETTY CASH 07/05/01 000249 PETTY CASH 07/05/01 000249 PETTY CASH 07/05/01 000249 PETTY CASH 07/05/01 000249 PETTY CASH 07/05/01 000249 PETTY CASH 07/05/01 000249 PETTY CASH 07/05/01 000249 PETTY CASH 07/05/01 000249 PETTY CASH 07/05/01 000249 PETTY CASR 07/05/01 000249 PETTY CASH 07/05/01 000249 PETTY CASH 07/05/01 000249 PETTY CASH 07/05/01 000249 PETTY CASH 07/05/01 000249 PETTY CASH 07/05/01 000249 PETTY CASH 07/05/01 000249 PETTY CASH 07/05/01 000249 PETTY CASH 07/03/01 000249 PETTY CASH CITYWIDE R-O-W WEED SPRAYING PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT ACCOUNT NUMBER 194-2340 280-2340 330-2340 340-2340 190-183-999-5330 190-18~-999-5330 190-183-4982 190-185-999-5222 190-183-4989 001-171-999-5311 001-171-999-5311 001-171-999-5311 165-199-813-5804 190-185-999-5301 190-185-999-5301 190-185-999-5301 190-185-999-5301 001-2122 001-164-601-5402 190-184-999-5301 190-183-999-5370 190-180-999-5260 190-183-999-5370 190-183-999-5340 190-186-999-5301 001-164-601-5260 001-111-999-5260 190-180-999-5260 001-100-999-5260 190-185-999-5301 001-163-999-5261 001-164-601-5250 190-180-999-5261 001-164-601-5250 001-110-999-5260 001-171-999-5261 001-162-999-5261 001-111-999-5260 001-140-999-5260 001-140-999-5262 190-185-999-5301 ITEM AMOUNT 5.44 100.45 18.15 130.60 160.00 128.00 25.00 859.95 30.00 216.01 288.48 3,470.7'3 400.00 825.00 38.75 30.00 64.78 83.99 795.00 51.56 13.40 22.18 35.07 25.00 41.28 45.00 25.00 17.99 11.98 4.28 5.00 25.03 42.28 26.57 30.00 50.00 50.00 9.66 8.00 15.94 7.48 CHECK AMOUNT 5,456.06 288.00 25.00 859.95 30.00 3,975.22 400.00 958.53 83.99 795.00 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 8 07/05/01 10:35 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VODCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 70138 70138 70138 70138 70138 70138 70138 70138 70140 70141 70142 70142 70143 70143 70144 70145 70145 70145 70146 70146 70147 70147 70148 70148 70148 70148 70149 70149 70150 70150 70151 70152 70153 70154 70155 CHECK DATE 07/05/01 07/05/01 07/05/01 07/05/01 07/05/01 07/05/01 07/05/01 07/05/01 07/05/01 07/05/01 07/05/01 07/05/01 07/05/01 07/05/01 07/05/01 07/05/01 07/05/01 07/05/01 07/05/01 07/05/01 07/05/01 07/05/01 07/05/0t 07/05/01 07/05/01 07/05/01 07/05/01 07/05/01 07/05/01 07/05/01 07/05/01 07/05/01 07/05/01 07/05/01 07/05/01 VENDOR NUMBER 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000254 003687 003687 000635 000635 002612 004494 004494 004494 002176 002176 000262 000262 002110 002110 002110 002110 000266 000266 000353 000353 000418 000411 002226 000403 000645 VENDOR NAME PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY DASH PETTY CASH PONDER, JAN PRESS ENTERPRISE COHPAN QUEST ENVIRONMENTAL QUEST ENVIRONMENTAL R & J PARTY PALACE R & J PARTY PALACE RADIO SHACK RAMONA TIRE INC RAMONA TIRE INC RAMORA TIRE INC RANCHO CALIF BUS PARK A RANCHO CALIF BUS PARK A RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST RENTAL SERVICE CORPORAT RENTAL SERVICE CORPORAT RENTAL SERVICE CORPORAT RENTAL SERVICE CORPORAT R[GHTWAY RIGHTWAY RIVERSIDE CO AUDITOR RIVERSIDE CO AUDITOR RIVERSIDE CO CLERK & RE RIVERSIDE CO FLOOD DONT RUSSO, HARY ANNE SHAWN SCOTT POOL & SPA SMART & FINAL INC ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-183-999-5340 001-161-999-5260 190-183-999-5370 001-161-999-5222 001-162-999-5220 001-164-601-5250 001-140-999-5261 001-165-999-5220 REFUND:JULY 4TH VENDOR APPS 190-183-4992 RENEW ANNUAL SBSCRPTN:CTY CLRK 001-120-999-5228 REMOVAL OF RAZ-MAT MATERIALS REMOVAL OF HAZ-MAT MATERIALS 001-164-601-5430 001-164-601-5430 RENTAL EQUIP:JAZZ FEST:5/12-13 280-1~9-999-5362 RENTAL EQUIP:ST.PAINTING:6/2-3 280-199-999-5362 MISC COMPUTER SUPPLIES 320-199-999-5221 FIRE PREVENTION VEHICLE REPAIR 001-171~999-5214 FIRE PREVENTION VEHICLE REPAIR 001-171-999-5214 CREDIT:SALES TAX OVERCHARGED 001-171-999-5214 JUL-SEP BUS.PK ASSOC.DUES:DIAZ 001-164-604-5226 JUL-SEP BUS.PNK ASSOC.DUES:C.H 340-199-701-5226 JUN 01-99-02003-0 FLOATING HTR 001-104-601-5250 JUN 02-79-10100-1 NW SPORTS PK 190-1270 RENTAL EQUIP FOR PW MAINT CREW 001-164-601-5238 RENTAL EQUIP FOR PW MAINT CREW 001-164-601-5238 RENTAL EQUIPMENT FOR PW MAINT 001-164-601-5238 RENTAL EQUIP FOR PW MAINT CREW 001-164-601-5238 RENTAL EQUIP - SMART PROM RENTAL EQUIP - SMART PROM 190-183-999-5372 190-183-999-5372 MAy PARKING CITATION ASSESSMNT 001-2260 MAY PARKING CITATION ASSESSMNT 001-2265 MAY "NTC OF COMPLETION" COPIES 001-163-999-5250 PLAN CHECK FEES:MURRIETA CREEK 210-165-707-5804 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 JUN POOL MAINTENANCE SVCS 190-186-999-5212 RECREATION SUPPLIES FOR TCC 190-184-999-5301 ITEM AMOUNT 75.00 15.00 49.83 7.23 2.96 3.00 20.00 3.21 140.00 143.02 170.00 700.00 746.30 420.28 269.27 652.07 421.00 1.35- 1,813.72 1,319.07 424.04 110.78 421.42 89.46 441.60 66.66 135.75 135.75 1,414.50 7-/0.00 12.00 3,717.84 700.00 ~4.00 143.20 CHECK AMOUNT 738.93 140.00 143.02 870.00 1,166.58 269.27 1,071.72 3,132.79 534.82 1,019.14 271.50 2,184.50 12.00 3,717.84 700.00 774.00 VOUCHRE2 02/05/01 10:35 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME 70155 07/05/01 000645 SMART & FINAL 70155 07/05/01 000645 SHART & FINAL INC 70155 07/05/01 000645 SMART & FINAL 70156 07/05/01 000824 SO CALIF ASSN OF GOVERN 70157 07/05/01 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 70157 07/05/01 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 70157 07/05/01 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 70157 07/05/01 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 70157 07/05/01 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 70157 07/05/01 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 70157 07/05/01 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 70157 07/05/01 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 70157 07/05/01 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 70158 07/05/01 SONOLT, BOBBIKAY 70159 07/05/01 SOUTHWESTERN RIVERSIDE 70160 07/05/01 004247 STERICYCLE INC 70161 07/05/01 000465 STRADLEY, MARY KATHLEEN 70161 07/05/01 000465 STRADLEY, MARY KATHLEEN 70162 07/05/01 004565 TAOS INDIAN TRADING 70163 0~/05/01 000305 TARGET STORE 70163 07/05/01 000305 TARGET STORE 70163 07/05/01 000305 TARGET STORE 70163 07/05/01 000305 TARGET STORE CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION SUPPLIES FOR SMART PROGRAM SUPPLIES FOR 4TH OF JULY SUPPLIES FOR SMART PROGRAM ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP FOR FY 01-02 JUN 2-22-575-0876 O.T.FRONT ST JUN 2-20-792-2444 VARIOUS MTRS JUN 2-19-683-3263 FRONT ST PED JUN 2-22-496-3439 VARIOUS MTRS JUN 2-00'397-5042 CITY HALL JUN 2-00-397-5067 VARIOUS MTRS JUN 2-00-397-5067 VARIOUS MTRS JUN 2-02-502-8077 MAINT FAC JUN 2-18-528-9980 SANTIAGO RD REFUND:SUMMER DAY CAMP REFUND:SECURITY DEPOSIT MEDIC SQUAD MED WASTE DISPOSAL TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS SISTER CITIES VISITOR GIFTS REC SUPPLIES FOR SMART PRGM REC SUPPLIES FOR TCSD RECREATION SUPPLIES FOR TCSD REC SUPPLIES FOR TEEN PROGRAM ACCOUNT NUMBER 190-183-999-5372 190-183-999-5370 190-183-999-5372 001-100-999-5226 190-1990 190-180-999-5319 001-164-603-5319 190-180-999-5319 340-199-701-5240 190-180-999-5240 193-180-999-5240 340-1990 190-180-999-5319 190-182-4984 190-2900 001-171-999-5311 190-183-999-5330 190-183-999-5330 001-101-999-5280 190-183-999-5372 190-183-999-5320 190-183-999-5320 190-183-999-5320 ITEM AMOUNT 54.67 146.45 39.81 3,602.00 597.96 157.25 332.43 110.34 6,963.10 25.92 774.51 1,073.94 49.21 305.00 100.00 47.20 524.00 280.00 1,500.00 6.43 797.56 125.16 80.59 70164 07/05/01 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 001-2125 596.25 70164 07/05/01 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 190-2125 96.75 70164 07/05/01 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 193-2125 6.75 70164 07/05/01 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 194-2125 2.25 70164 07/05/01 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 320-2125 45.00 70164 07/05/01 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 330-2125 33.75 70164 07/05/01 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 001547 UN DUES 340-2125 51.75 70165 07/05/01 000642 TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE 70165 07/05/01 000642 TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE 70165 07/05/01 000642 TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE 70165 07/05/01 000642 TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE 70165 07/05/01 000642 TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE 70165 07/05/01 000642 TEMECULA CiTY FLEXIBLE 70165 07/05/01 000642 TEMEOULA CITY FLEXIBLE 70165 07/05/01 000642 TEMECULA CITY FLEXISLE 70165 07/05/01 000642 TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 001-1020 EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 165-1020 EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 190-1020 EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 194-1020 EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 192-1020 EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 193-1020 EMPLOYEE CONTRISUTION TO FLEX 280-1020 EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 330-1020 EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO FLEX 340-1020 001-171-999-5214 70166 07/05/01 004541 TEMECULA RADIATOR/AUTO PARAMEDIC SQUAD VEHICLE REPAIR 4,424.10 225.00 534.00 3.75 1.25 9.75 75.00 466.66 11.25 128.55 PAGE 9 CHECK AMOUNT 384.13 3,602.00 10,084.66 305.00 100.00 47.20 804.00 1,500.00 1,009.74 832.50 5,750.76 128.55 VOUCHER2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 10 07/05/01 10:35 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 70167 70168 70169 70170 70170 70170 7O17O 70170 70170 70170 70170 70170 70170 CHECK VENDOR VENDOR DATE NUMBER NAME 07/05/01 003140 TEMECULA VALLEY TAEKWON 07/05/01 000919 TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED 07/05/01 003366 TORAN DEVELOP. & CONSTR ITEM DESCRIPTION TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS MAINT/REPAIR PW MAINT VEHICLES EMERGENCY REPAIRS:OLD TOWN 07/05/01 001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP) 001065 DEF COMP 07/05/01 001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP) 001065 DEF COMP 07/05/01 001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP) 001065 DEF COMP 07/05/01 001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP) 001065 DEF COMP 07/05/01 001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP) 001065 DEF COMP 07/05/01 001065 U S C M WEST (OEF COMP) 001065 DEF COMP 07/05/01 001065 U S C M WEST (OEF COMp) 001065 DEF COMP 07/05/01 001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP) 001065 DEF COMP 07/05/01 001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP) 001065 DEF COMP 07/05/01 001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP) 001065 DEF COMP 70171 07/05/01 000389 U S C M WEST (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIE 70171 07/05/01 000389 U S C M WEST (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIE 70171 07/05/01 000389 U S C M WEST (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIE 70171 07/05/01 000389 U S C M WEST (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIE 70171 07/05/01 000389 U S C M WEST (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIE 70171 07/05/01 000389 U S C M WEST (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIE 70171 07/05/01 000389 U S C M WEST (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIE 70171 07/05/01 000389 U S C M WEST (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIE ACCOUNT NUMBER 190-183-999-5330 001-164~601-5214 001-164-603-5250 001-2080 165-2080 190-2080 192-2080 193-2080 194-2080 280-2080 300-2080 320-2080 340-2080 001-2160 165-2160 190-2160 193-2160 280-2160 320-2160 330-2160 340-2160 ITEM AMOUNT 62.40 129.~ 1,497.75 10,418.72 101.17 2,019.95 7.50 128.69 44.50 114.59 88.55 lw416.68 169.46 910.76 90.50 2,628.74 18.70 26.32 r5.42 63.00 34.90 70172 07/05/01 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 001-2120 127.05 70172 07/05/01 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 165-2120 8.75 70172 07/05/01 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 190-2120 22.60 70172 07/05/01 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 192-2120 .10 70172 07/05/01 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 193-2120 2.20 70172 07/05/01 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 194-2120 .50 70172 07/05/01 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UN 280-2120 2.50 70172 07/05/01 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 320-2120 5.00 70172 07/05/01 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 U~ 330-2120 5.00 70172 07/05/01 000325 UNITED WAY 000325 UW 340-2120 .60 70173 07/05/01 URISA 07/05/01 004261 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 70174 07/05/01 004550 WEST END UNIFORMS 07/05/01 004550 WEST END UNIFORMS 003756 WHITE HOUSE SANITATION 70175 70175 70177 70178 NEW MEMBERSRIP:BEAL/DEGANGE JUN XXX-9897 GENERAL USAGE TEMEGULA PD UNIFORM PATCHES SALES TAX JUN CLEANING SVC:BTRFLD STAGE REFUND:MUSIC-INSTANT PIANO REFUND:EXERCISE-BELLY DANCING REFUND:SUMMER DAY CAMP 07/05/01 07/05/01 WICKESw MICHELLE 001-161-610-5226 320-1990 001-170-999-5243 001-170-999-5243 190-180-999-5250 190-183-4982 190-183-4982 190-182-4984 07/05/01 WILEY, OLIVIA YOUNG-HOSEY, PAMELA 07/05/01 264. O0 75.92 2,280.00 171.00 50.00 20.00 25.00 CHECK AMOUNT 62.40 129.66 1,497.75 14,509.81 3,848,34 174.30 264.00 75.92 2,451.00 50.00 20.00 25.00 685.00 TOTAL CHECKS 228,277.23 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 11 07/12/01 16:18 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 165 RDA DEV- LOW/MOD SET ASIDE 190 COHMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND 261 CFD 88-12 ADMIN EXPENSE FUND 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP 300 INSURANCE FUND 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 340 FACILITIES 471 CFD 98-1ADMIN EXPENSE FUND AHOUNT 71,683.03 16,363.31 115,461.06 1.06 15,553.83 747.76 309,786.14 3,000.00 9,093.30 4,264.51 2,010.53 2,874.12 3,378.62 2,750.00 TOTAL 556,967.27 VOUCHRE2 CiTY OF TEMECULA PAGE 1 07/12/01 16:18 VOUCHER/CNECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS VOUCNER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRiPTiON NUMBER AMOUNT 70180 07/12/01 WILSHIRE ROYALE HOWARD 70181 07/12/01 000374 SO CALIF EDISON 70185 07/12/01 ADAMS, AARON 70186 07/12/01 001916 ALBERT A WEBB ASSOCIATE 70186 07/12/01 001916 ALBERT A WEBB ASSOCIATE HTL:CAM CONF:7/12-14/O1:W.OTT 190-180-999-5258 225.72 EMERG.POWER/IRRIG.SYS:PALA RD 001-165-999-5250 106.88 REIMB: LIBRARY BOND: 6/25/01 001-110-999-5260 90.50 CFD ~-12 CONSULTING SERVICES 261-199-999-5248 3,000.00 CFD 98-1 CONSULTING SERVICES 471-199-999-5248 2,750.00 70187 07/12/01 002527 AMERICAN FLAG AND BANNE SlX - CITY OF TEMECULA FLAGS 001-110-999-5250 395.01 70187 07/12/01 002527 AMERICAN FLAG AND BANNE SIX - CITY OF TEMECULA FLAGS 001-101-999-5280 395.01 70187 07/12/01 002527 /U4ERICAN FLAG AND BANNE SHIPPING PER FLAG 001-110-999-5250 5.25 70187 07/12/01 002527 M4ERICAN FLAG AND BANNE SHIPPING PER FLAG 001-101-999-5280 5.25 70187 07/12/01 002527 AMERICAN FLAG AND SANNE SALES TAX 001-110-999-5250 29.63 70187 07/12/01 002527 AMERICAN FLAG AND BANNE SALES TAX 001-101-999-5280 29.62 70188 07/12/01 004240 AMERICAN FORENSIC NURSE CITY LIMITS BLOOD DRAWS-PD/CNP 001-170-999-5328 84.00 70188 07/12/01 004240 AMERICAN FORENSIC NURSE CITY LIMITS BLOOD DRAWS-PD/CHP 001-170-999-5328 357.00 70188 07/12/01 004240 AMERICAN FORENSIC NURSE CITY LIMITS BLOOD DRAWS-PD/CHP 001-170-999-5328 105.00 70189 07/12/01 004446 AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIV MEMBERSHIP DUES:HARVEY,SCOTT 001-165-999-5226 135.00 70190 07/12/01 003285 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV JUN ~L~T/TOWEL RENTAL:CITY HALL 340-199-701-5250 119.25 70190 07/12/01 003285 AMERIPRiDE UNIFORM SERV JUN ~LRT/TOWEL RENTAL:MNTC FAC 340-199-702-5250 42.75 70190 07/12/01 003285 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV JUN MAT/TOWEL RENTAL:CRC 190-182-999-5250 105.30 70190 07/12/01 003285 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV JUN MAT/TOWEL RENTAL:TCC 190-184-999-5250 46.20 70190 07/12/01 003285 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV JUN MAT/TOWEL RENTAL:MUSEUM 190-185-999-5250 39.55 70190 07/12/01 003285 AMERIPRIDE UNIFORM SERV UNIFORMS RENTAL:TCSO MNTC 190-180~999-5243 87.50 70190 07/12/01 003285 AMERIPRIOE UNIFORM SERV UNIFORMS RENTAL:PW MNTC 001-164-601-5243 115.10 70190 07/12/01 003285 AMERiPRiOE UNIFORM SERV dUN IL~T/T(R~EL RENTAL:SR CTR 190-181-999-5250 64.20 70191 07/12/01 003~5 ANDYS GLASS COMPANY RES IMPR PRGM:LUBNIEWSKI 165-199-813-5804 1,212.00 70192 07/12/01 000101 APPLE ONE, INC. TEMP HELP W/E 06/16 WYTRYKUS 001-162-999-5118 536.25 70192 07/12/01 000101 APPLE ONE, INC. TEMP HELP W/E 06/23 ~IYTRYI(US 001-162-999-5118 572.00 70192 07/12/01 000101 APPLE ONE, INC. TEMP HELP W/E 06/30 WYTRYKUS 001-162-999-5118 572.00 70193 07/12/01 003266 ARGUS DATA SECURITY OFFSITE RECORDS STORAGE 001-120-999-5277 145.50 70194 07/12/01 004561 AUDIO EVOLUTION RD9 ANTENNA-B&S VEHICLE 320-199-999-5242 94.00 70194 07/12/01 004561 AUDIO EVOLUTION RD9 ANTENNA-B&S VEHICLE 320-199-999-5242 94.00 70194 07/12/01 004561 AUDIO EVOLUTION RD9 ANTENNA-S&S VEHICLE 320-199-999-5242 94.00 70194 07/12/01 004561 AUDIO EVOLUTION SALES TAX:CITY VEHICLE ANTENNA 320-199-999-5242 6.54 70195 07/12/01 002713 BALLOONS GALORE BALLOONS-VAIL RANCH ANNEX FEST 190-183-999-5370 481.82 70196 07/12/01 000622 BANTA ELECTRIC-REFRIGER REPAIR POOL LIGHTS: CRC 190-182-999-5212 234.00 70196 07/12/01 000622 BANTA ELECTRIC-REFRIGER iNSTALL SENSOR GONTROLS:TCC 190-184-999-5212 245.00 70197 07/12/01 002541 BECKER CONSTRUCTION SRV R&R ~CX~DEN STREET SIGNS 001-164-601-5402 3,080.00 CHECK AMOUNT 225.72 106.88 90.50 5,750.00 859.7/ 546.00 135.00 619.85 1,212.00 1,680.25 145.50 288.54 481.82 479.00 3,080.00 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 2 07/12/01 16:18 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM NUMSER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 70198 07/12/01 BESWICK, STEVE REIMB:MEMBERSHIP DUES ASCE 001-165-999-5226 205.00 205.00 70199 07/12/01 BORTFELD, K.JENNIFER REFUND:TINY TOTS-CREATIVE BEG 190-183-4982 30.00 30.00 70200 07/12/01 CA ASSOC OF COOE ENFORC MEMBERSHIP:MARIANNE L. SALAZAR 001-161-999-5226 40.00 40.00 70201 07/12/01 000128 CAL SURANCE ASSOCIATES CITY HALL FIRE INSURANCE 300-199-999-5204 2,986.00 2,986.00 70202 07/12/01 004228 CAMERON WELDING SUPPLY RECREATION SUPPLIES:TCC 190-184-999-5301 25.70 25.70 70203 07/12/01 003940 CHESHERS CUSTOM EMBROID NAVY POLO SHIRTS FOR FINANCE 001-140-999-5260 400.00 70203 07/12/01 003940 CNESNERS CUSTOM EMBROID SALES TAX 001-140-999-5260 30.00 430.00 70204 07/12/01 000442 COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS FIRE ALARM SERVICE CALL-CRC 190-182-999-5212 65.00 65.00 70205 07/12/01 004123 D L PHARES & ASSOCIATES JULY RENT:POLICE STOREFRONT 70206 07/12/01 001233 DANS FEED & SEED INC PROPANE GAS FOR FIELD TANKS 001-170-999-5229 1,661.73 1,661.73 001-164-601-5218 11.12 11.12 70207 07/12/01 002990 DAVID TURCH & ASSOCIATE RETAIN ADVOCACY FIRM:FED FUND 001-110-999-5248 4,000.00 70208 07/12/01 70209 07/12/01 70209 07/12/01 70209 07/12/01 70209 07/12/01 70209 07/12/01 70209 07/12/01 70209 07/12/01 70209 07/12/01 70209 07/12/01 70210 07/12/01 70210 07/12/01 70210 07/12/01 70210 07/12/01 70210 07/12/01 70211 07/12/01 70211 07/12/01 002701 DIVERSIFIED RISK JUNE PREMIUMS:SPECIAL EVENTS 300-2180 1,017.59 004192 DOWNS COMMERCIAL FUELIN FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 001-163-999-5263 94.83 004192 DOWNS COMMERCIAL FUELIN FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 001-161-999-5263 240.59 004192 DOWNS COMMERCIAL FUELIN FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 001-1990 49.18 004192 DOWNS COMMERCIAL FUELIN FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 001-162-999-5263 191.36 004192 DOWNS COMMERCIAL FUELIN FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 001-120-999-5262 31.61 004192 DOWNS COMMERCIAL FUELIN FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 190-180-999-5263 12.00 004192 DOWNS COMMERCIAL FUELIN FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 001-165-999-5263 210.26 004192 DOWNS COMMERCIAL FUELIN FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 001-164-601-5263 883.57 004192 DOWNS COMMERCIAL FUELIN FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 001-164-604-5263 41.47 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP W/E 06/29 RUSH 001-161-999-5118 2,085.35 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP W/E 06/29 EBON 340-199-701-5118 853.80 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP W/E 06/29 EBON 340-199-702-5118 284.60 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC lIMP HELP W/E 06/29 DAVIS 190-186-999-5118 746.35 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP W/E 06/29 HEER 001-162-999-5118 1,143.20 004130 ELSIRORE ELECTRICAL SUP SPECIAL ORDER LIGHT FIXTURES 190-182-999-5212 190.33 004130 ELSINORE ELECTRICAL SUP SPECIAL ORDER LIGHT FIXTURES 190-185-999-5212 444.10 4,000.00 1,017.59 1,754.87 5,113.30 634.43 70212 07/12/01 002060 EUROPEAN DELI & CATERIN REFSHMNTS:PLANNING COMM MTGS 001-161-999-5260 190.44 190.44 70213 07/12/01 003959 EVERETT & EVERETT PAINT RES IMPR PRGM: JACOBS,BARBARA 165-199-813-5804 3,200.00 70214 07/12/01 70214 07/12/01 70214 07/12/01 70214 07/12/01 70214 07/12/01 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE JUN LDSCP IMPR:RIDGEVIEW 193-180-999-5212 450.00 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE JUN LDSCP IMPR:RIDGEVIEW 193-180-999-5212 315.00 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE JUN LDSCP IMPR:MARTINIQUE 193-180-999-5212 375.00 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE JUN LDSCP IMPH:WINCHESTER CRK 190-180-999-5416 75.00 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE JUN LDSCP IMPN:WINCNESTER CRK 190-180-999-5416 440.00 3,200.00 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEHECULA PAGE 5 07/12/01 16:18 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME 70214 07/12/01 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 70214 07/12/01 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 70214 07/12/01 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 70214 07/12/01 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 70214 07/12/01 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 70214 07/12/01 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 70214 07/12/01 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 70214 07/12/01 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 70214 07/12/01 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 70214 07/12/01 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 70214 07/12/01 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 70214 07/12/01 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 70214 07/12/01 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 70214 07/12/01 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 70214 07/12/01 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 70214 07/12/01 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 70214 07/12/01 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 70214 07/12/01 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 70214 07/12/01 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 70214 07/12/01 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 70214 07/12/01 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 70214 07/12/01 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 70214 07/12/01 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 7D214 07/12/01 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 70214 07/12/01 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 70214 07/12/01 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 70214 07/12/01 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 70214 07/12/01 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 70214 07/12/01 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 70214 07/12/01 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 70214 07/12/01 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 70214 07/12/01 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 70214 07/12/01 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 70214 07/12/01 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 70214 07/12/01 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 70214 07/12/01 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 70215 07/12/01 000478 FAST SIGNS 70215 07/12/01 000478 FAST SIGNS 70216 07/12/01 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS 70216 07/12/01 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS 70216 07/12/01 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS 70216 07/12/01 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS 70216 07/12/01 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC 70216 07/12/01 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS 70216 07/12/01 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS 70216 07/12/01 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS 70216 07/12/01 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC 70216 07/12/01 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS 70216 07/12/01 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC ITEM DESCRIPTION JUN LDSCP IMPR:WINCHESTER CRK JUN LDSCP IMPR:MARGARITA PRK JUN LDSCP IMPR:MARGARTIA PRK JUN LOSCP IMPR:RANCHO VISTA RD JUN LDSCP IMPR:WINCNESTER CRK JUN LDSCP [MPR:WINCNESTER CRK JUN LDSCP IMPR:N1NCNESTER CRK JUN LDSCP IMPR:~INCHESTER CRK JUN LDSCP IMPR:~INCHESTER CRK JUN LDSCP IMPR:IHSTALL BUBBLER dUN LDSCP IMPR:INSTALL RURDLER JUN LDSCP IMPR:INSTALL BUBSLER dUN LDSCP IMPR:ROTARY PRN JUN LDSCP IMPR:CALLE ARAGON PK dUN LDSCP IMPR: CRC JUN LDSCP IMPR: CRC JUN LDSCP IMPR: CRC JUN LDSCP IMPR:JOHN RAGEE PRK dUN LDSCP IMPR:R.C.SPRTS PRK dUN LDSCP IMPR:OLD TUN REHA8 JUN LDSCP IMPR:RANCHO HGHLD JUN LDSCP IMPR:RANCHO HGHLD JUN LDSCP IMPR:RANCNO HGNLD JUN LDSCP IMPR:RANCNO HGHLD JUN LDSCP IMPR:VINTAGE HILLS JUN LDSCP INPR:RARGARITA dUN LDSCP IMPR:MEADONS PRICI~Y JUN LDGCP IMPR:MIRADA JUN LDSCP IMPR:RIVERTON PARK JUN LDSCP IMPR:PRESLEY COUNTRY JUN LDSCP IMPR:LOMA LINOA PRK dUN LDSCP IMPR:CRC PRKLOT JUN LOSCP IMPR:NOOOCREST JUN LDSCP IMPR:R.V.SPRTS PARK JUN LDSCP IMPR:SPORTS PARK JUN LOSCP IMPR:DE PORTOLA RD VAIL RANCH NELCOME BANNER SALES TAX EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES EXPRESS HAIL SERVICES EXPRESS RAIL SERVICES EXPRESS RAIL SERVICES EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES ACCOUNT NUMBER 190-180-999-5416 190-180-999-5416 190-180-999-5416 193-180-999-5415 190-180-999-5416 190-180-999-5416 190-180-999-5416 190-180-999-5416 190-180-999-5416 193-180-999-5212 193-180-999-5212 193-180-999-5212 190-180-999-5416 190-180-999-5416 190-182-999-5415 190-182-999-5415 190-182-999-5415 190-180-999-5416 190-180-999-5416 001-164-605-5416 193-180-999-5212 193-180-999-5212 193-180-999-5212 193-180-999-5212 193-180-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 193-180-999-5212 193-180-999-5212 190-180-999-5416 195-180-999-5415 190-180-999-5416 190-182-999-5415 193-180-999-5212 190-180-999-5415 190-180-~-5415 193-180-999-5212 190-183-999-5370 190-183-999-5370 001-162-999-5230 001-161-999-5230 001-171-999-5230 001-16~-604-5250 001-165-999-5230 001-163-999-5230 001-150-999-5230 001-162-999-5230 001-165-999-5230 001-171-999-5230 001-120-999-5230 ITEM AMOUNT 550.00 295.00 480.00 52.80 240.00 75.00 120.00 1,125.00 54.00 825.00 875.00 210.00 975.00 385.50 180.00 88.00 24.00 175.00 1,620.00 1,500.00 600.00 750.00 45.00 60.00 3,743.77 4,830.00 350.00 150.00 100.00 352.00 176.00 558.00 133.96 232.25 305.26 168.25 245.04 18.38 52.60 22.00 64.45 7.17 77.31 17.53 12.92 70.64 26.07 37.79 17.53 CHECK AMOUNT 24,058.79 263.42 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 4 07/12/01 16:18 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 70216 07/12/01 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC 70216 07/12/01 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC 70216 07/12/01 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC 70216 07/12/01 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES 001-162-999-5230 001-165-999-5230 001-163-999-5230 001-150-999-5230 172.62 29.39 11.00 12.92 631.94 70217 07/12/01 004310 FEDEX GROUND GROUND EXPRESS PACKAGE SERVICE 001-111-999-5230 28.87 28.87 70218 07/12/01 000166 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO 70218 07/12/01 000166 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO 70218 07/12/01 000166 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO PAUBA RO IMPR:LITIGATION PAUBA RD INPR:LITIGATION PAUSA RD IMPR:LITIGATION 210-165-606-5801 210-165-606-5801 210-165-606-5801 400.00 400.00 400.00 1,200.00 70219 07/12/01 003347 FIRST BANKGARD CENTER 70219 07/12/01 003341 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 70219 07/12/01 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 70219 07/12/01 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 70219 07/12/01 003347 FIRST 8ANKCARD CENTER 70219 07/12/01 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 70219 07/12/01 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER XX-7824 COHERGHERO:LEAGUE OF C 001-1990 XX-9277 R.ROSERTS:LEAGUE OF CI 001-1990 XX-2292 G.ROBERTS:CAMERA/CONF 001-140-999-5242 XX-2292 G.ROBERTS:CAMERA/CONF 300-1990 XX-2292 G.ROBERTS:CAMERA/CONF 001-1990 XX-6165 YATES:EMPLOYEE MEETING 001-150-999-5265 XX-1143 PARKER:OFF-SITE MTG 190-180-999-5260 1,229.64 1,089.87 249.93 249.92 333.00 390.93 174.00 3,717.29 70220 07/12/01 001937 GALLS INC TRIAGE DISASTER MGMT KIT:MEDIC 001-171-999-5311 341.83 341.83 70221 07/12/01 002528 GLASS BLASTERS CITY MUGS FOR NEW HIRES 001-150-999-5265 16.13 16.13 70222 07/12/01 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT 70222 07/12/01 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT 70222 07/12/01 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT 70222 07/12/01 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT 70222 07/12/01 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT 70222 07/12/01 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT 70222 07/12/01 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT 70222 07/12/01 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT 70222 07/12/01 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT 70222 07/12/01 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT 70222 07/12/01 00017'7 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT 70222 07/12/01 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT 70222 07/12/01 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PROOUCT 70222 07/12/01 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT 70222 07/12/01 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT 70222 07/12/01 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT 70222 07/12/01 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT 70222 07/12/01 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT 70222 07/12/01 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT 70222 07/12/01 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT 70224 07/12/01 004019 GOLDEN STATE FENCE COMP 70224 07/12/01 004019 GOLDEN STATE FENCE COMP 70225 07/12/01 000711 GRAPHICS UNLIMITED LITH 70225 07/12/01 000711 GRAPHICS UNLIMITED LITH OFFICE SUPPLIES-CITY MGR 001-110-999-5220 OFFICE SUPPLIES-CITY MGR 001-110-999-5220 OFFICE SUPPLIES-CITY CLERK 001-120-999-5220 OFFICE SUPPLIES-COPY CENTER 330-199-999-5242 OFFICE SUPPLIES-FINANCE DEPT 001-140-999-5220 OFFICE SUPPLIES-HUMAN RESOURCE 001-150-999-5220 OFFICE SUPPLIES-DLDG & SAFETY OFFICE SUPPLIES-CRC LASER POINTERS:MUSEUM OFFICE SUPPLIES-SMART PRGM OFFICE SUPPLIES-TCSO OFFICE SUPPLIES:SR CENTER OFFICE SUPPLIES-CASH REGISTER OFFICE SUPPLIES-MUSEUM OFFICE SUPPLIES-TCSD OFFICE SUPPLIES-FIRE DEPT OFFICE SUPPLIES-FIRE DEPT OFFICE SUPPLIES-RDA:LOW/MOD OFFICE SUPPLIES-RDA:LOW/MOD OFFICE SUPPLIES-RECORDS MGMT 001-162-999-5220 190-182-999-5301 190-185-999-5301 190-183-999-5372 190-180-999-5220 190-181-999-5220 190-186-999-5220 190-185-999-5220 190-180-999-5220 001-171-999-5220 001-171-999-5220 165-199-999-5220 280-199-999-5220 001-120-999-5277 REL RETENTION:R.C. PVC FENCE 193-2035 REL RETENTION:PALA PARK FENCE 190-2035 CONCERT BROCHURE GRAPHIC DESGN 190-180-999-5250 CONCERT BROCHURE GRAPHIC DESGN 190-180-999-5222 246.01 404.65 351.50 432.65 378.91 61.28 172.88 182.07 81.47 241.22 99.73 87.46 1,139.42 18.81 6~8,79 400.00 66.07 4.03 4.03 301.00 2,500.00 357.30 198.63 1,000.00 5,321.98 2,857.30 1,198.63 70226 07/12/01 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC HARDWARE SUPPLIES-FIRE DEPT 001-171-999-5212 38.57 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PACE 5 07/12/01 16=18 VOUCNER/CNECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOUS VOUCRER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER 70226 07/12/01 000186 70226 07/12/01 000186 70226 07/12/01 000186 70226 07/12/01 000186 70226 07/12/01 000186 70226 07/12/01 000186 70226 07/12/01 000186 70226 07/12/01 000186 70226 07/12/01 000186 70226 07/12/01 000186 70226 07/12/01 000186 70226 07/12/01 000186 70226 07/12/01 000186 70226 07/12/01 000186 70226 07/12/01 000186 70226 07/12/01 000186 70226 07/12/01 000186 70226 07/12/01 000186 70226 07/12/01 000186 70227 07/12/01 70228 07/12/01 70228 07/12/01 70229 07/12/01 70230 07/12/01 70231 07/12/01 70232 07/12/01 70232 07/12/01 70232 07/12/01 70232 07/12/01 70232 07/12/01 70232 07/12/01 70232 07/12/01 70232 07/12/01 70233 07/12/01 70234 07/12/01 70235 07/12/01 70236 07/12/01 70237 07/12/01 70238 07/12/01 VENDOR NAME HANKS HARDWARE HANKS HARDWARE INC HANKS NARDWARE HANKS HARDWARE INC HANKS HARDWARE HANKS HARDWARE HANKS HARDWARE INC HANKS HARDWARE HANKS HARDWARE HANKS HARDWARE HANKS HARDWARE HANKS HARDWARE HANKS BARDWARE HANKS HARDWARE HANKS HARDWARE HANKS HARDWARE INC NANKS HARDWARE IRC RANKS HARDWARE HANKS HARDWARE 004242 HARMONY ARTISTS INC 001407 INTER VALLEY POOL SUPPL 001407 INTER VALLEY POOL SUPPL JOAN F. SPARKMAN ELEM. 003046 K F R 0 G 95.1 FM RADIO 002424 KELLEY DISPLAY INC 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE 001~7 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE 001667 KELLY TEMPOP~RRY SERVICE 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE 001091 KEYSER MARSTON ASSOCIAT 001085 L N CURT]S& SONS 000945 L P S COMPUTER SERVICE LAMONDE, BRIAN 000869 LAWRENCE WELK RESORT TN LENNAR HOMES-INLAND DIV ITEM DESCRIPTIOR HARDWARE SUPPLIES-TCSD REC HARDWARE SUPPLIES-CITY HALL CAN COMPACTORS:EXTREME RECYCLE SALES TAX HARDWARE SUPPLIES-TCSD MNTC TOOLS & EQUIP:TCSD MNTC TOOLS & EQUIP:TCSD MNTC TOOLS & EQUIP:TCSD MRTC HARDWARE SUPPLIES-TCC HARDWARE SUPPLIES-TCSD HARDWARE SUPPLIES-TCSD MNTC HARDWARE SUPPLIES-TCSD MNTC HARDWARE SUPPLIES-TCSD MNTC HARDWARE SUPPLIES-MUSEUM HARDWARE SUPPLIES-PW MNTC HARDWARE SUPPLIES*AQUATICS HARDWARE SUPPLIES-TCSD MNTC HARDWARE SUPPLIES-SPORTS PRGMS HARDWARE SUPPLIES:INFO SYS ENTERTAINMENT:JULY 4TH EVENT POOL SANITIZING CHEMICALS POOL SANITIZING CHEMICALS ACCOUNT NUMBER 190-183-999-5372 340-199-701-5212 194-180-999-5265 194-180-999-5265 190-180-999-5212 190-180-999-5242 340-199-701-5242 340-199-702-5242 190-184-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 190-180-999-5242 340-199-701-5242 340-199-702-5242 190-185-999-5212 001-164-603-5212 190-186-999-5301 190-180-999-5212 190-187-999-5301 320-199-999-5242 190-183-999-5570 190-186-999~5212 190-186-999-5212 REFUND:SECURITY DPST:MS01-0278 190-2900 HOT SUMMER BROADCAST SVCS 280-199-999-5362 JULY 4TH BANNERS CLEAN/SHIPPED 280-199-999-5362 TEMP HELP W/E 05/20 DANIELS TEMP HELP WE 05/20 DANIELS TEMP HELP W/E 05/27 OANIELS TEMP HELP W/E 06/03 DANIELS TEMP HELP W/E 06/03 HILNE TEMP HELP W/E 06/10 DANIELS TEMP HELP W/E 06/17 OANIELS TEMP HELP W/E 06/24 DANIELS JUN PROF SVCS:PUJOL ST DEVEL TOOLS & EQUIP FOR PARAMEDICS HP PRINTER SUPPLIES REFD:SPRTS-SKYRWK FLG FOOTBALL SR EXCURSION:SOUTH PACIFIC 001-161-999-5118 001-161-999-5118 001-161-999-5118 001-161-999-5118 001-140-999-5118 001-161-999-5118 001-161-999-5118 001-161-999-5118 165-199-999-5250 001-171-999-5311 320-199-999-5221 190-183-4982 190-183-999-5350 REFUND;OVRPMT PERMIT B00-2498 001-2290 ITEM AMOUNT 134.45 22.52 149.90 11.24 307.26 632.32 653.88 510.16 136.83 2.57 12.48 12.89 10.04 17.28 72.94 196.36 50.71 230.53 117.38 4,037.50 228.33 241,02 100.00 49.61 394.23 272.25 259.75 532.00 422.28 106.40 269.33 532.00 532.00 1,962.50 1,135.87 523.10 363.00 330.00 7.43 CHECK AMOUNT 3,320.31 4,037.50 469.35 100.00 49.61 394.23 2,926.01 1,962.50 1,135.87 523.10 363.00 330.00 7.43 VOUCHRE2 07/12/01 16:18 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR HUMBER DATE NUMBER 70239 07/12/01 004087 70239 07/12/01 004087 70239 07/12/01 004087 70240 07/12/01 003428 70241 07/12/01 000217 70241 07/12/01 000217 70242 07/12/01 004107 70243 07/12/01 000944 70243 07/12/01 000944 70244 07/12/01 000437 70244 07/12/01 000437 70244 07/12/01 000437 70245 07/12/01 004522 70245 07/12/01 004522 70246 07/12/01 003707 70247 07/12/01 004390 70248 07/12/01 004512 70249 07/12/01 004199 70250 07/12/01 002139 70250 07/12/01 002139 70251 07/12/01 004152 70252 07/12/01 003964 70252 07/12/01 003964 70255 07/12/01 002105 70253 07/12/01 002105 70254 07/12/01 002652 70254 07/12/01 002652 70255 07/12/01 002297 70256 07/12/01 004520 70256 07/12/01 004520 70256 07/12/01 004520 70257 07/12/01 003955 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS VENDOR ITEM NAME DESCRIPTION LOWE'S LOWE~S LOWE~S M V P TEMEOULA SHUTTLE HARDWARE SUPPLIES:TCC HARDWARE SUPPLIES:SR CENTER HARDWARE SUPPLIES-TCSD REC SAN DIEGO SPORTS FIELDS TOUR MARGARITA OFFICIALS ASS SOFTBALL OFFICIATING SERVICES ~LRRGARITA OFFICIALS ASS ASSN FEE 10% OF GAME FEE MASSA-LAVITT, SANDRA MCCAIN TRAFFIC SUPPLY I MCCAIN TRAFFIC SUPPLY I MORELAND & ASSOCIATES MORELAND & ASSOCIATES MORELAND & ASSOCIATES 6/25-6/29/01 CONSULTING SVCS TRAF SGNL MAINTENANCE TOOLS TRAF SNGL MAINTENANCE TOOLS ANNUAL CITY AUDIT FYO0-01 ANNUAL RDA AUDIT FYO0-01 ANNUAL RDA AUDIT FYO0-01 MULLIGANS FAMILY FUN CE DAY CAMP EXCURSION 6/21/01 MULLIGANS FAMILY FUN CE DAY CAMp EXCURSION 6/21/01 NATAL ASSN OF PURCHASIN MEMBERSHIP DUES:7/2001-7/2002 NATELSON COMPANY INC NINYO & MOORE NORTH COUNTY PUMP SERVI CONSULT SVCS:WATER PARK STUDY SOIL TESTING:40 ACRE PARK SITE REPAIR IRRIG.SYS PUMP a STN 84 NORTH COUNTY TIMES- ATT RECRUITMENT AD:LDSCP INSPECTOR NORTH COUNTY TIMES- ATT RECRUITMENT AD:MA]NT WORKER O~MALLEY ENGINEERING CO SURVEY SVCS:MARG RD WIDENING OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS S OFFICE SUPPLIES-FINANCE OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS S OFFICE SUPPLIES-FINANCE OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT OLO TOUN TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT OSCARS RESTAURANT REFRESHMENTS-MGMT WRKSHP 6-28 OSCARS RESTAUILRNT SALES TAX PACIFIC RELOCATION CONS APR-MAY CONSULT SVC:CHLDRN MUS PAINT CONNECTION, THE PAINT CONNECTION, THE PAINT CONNECTION, THE PANE CONSULTING SERVICE FACADE IMPRV PRGM:THE STAMPEDE AOD~L WRK:FACADE IMPR:STAMPEDE 1ST DRAW:FACADE IMPR:CHAPARRAL SUPPLIES FOR CITY PROMO PRGM ACCOUNT HUMBER 190-184-999-5212 190-181-999-5212 190-182-999-5301 210-190-173-5802 190-187-999-5250 190-187-99~-5250 001-161-999-5248 001-164-602-5242 001-164-602-5242 001-140-999-5248 165-199-999-5248 280-199-999-5248 190-183-999-5340 190-183-999-5340 001-140-999-5226 210-190-170-5802 210-190-173-5802 001-171-999-5212 190-180-999-5254 190-180-999-5254 210-165-706-5804 001-140-999-5220 001-140-999-5220 190-180-999-5214 001-162-999-5214 001-150-999-5261 001-150-999-5261 210-190-165~5804 280-199-813-5804 280-199-813-5804 280-199-813-5804 001-111-999-5270 ITEM AMOUNT 311.56 107.47 253.40 612.00 2,100.OO 210.00 2,463.03 509.13 129.42 3,951.06 500.00 500.00 572.00 135.00 160.00 1,500.00 2,800.00 7~7.68 72.50 92.50 7'75.00 51.65 71.02 19.15 19,15 433.00 29.10 4,4~5.00 1,897.89 1,155.78 5,000.00 2,465.75 PAGE 6 CHECK AMOUNT 672.43 612.00 2,310.00 2,463.03 638.55 4,951.06 707.00 160.OO 1,500.00 2,800.00 165.00 775.00 122.67 38.30 462.10 4,475.00 8,055.67 2,465.75 VOUCHRE2 07/12/01 16:18 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME 70258 07/12/01 000249 PETTY CASH 70258 07/12/01 000249 PETTY CASH 70258 07/12/01 000249 PETTY CASH 70258 07/12/01 000249 PETTY CASH 70258 07/12/01 000249 PETTY CASH 70258 07/12/01 000249 PETTY CASH 70258 07/12/01 000249 PETTY CASH 70259 07/12/01 000254 PRESS ENTERPRISE CONPAN 70259 07/12/01 000254 PRESS ENTERPRISE COMPAN 70260 07/12/01 001416 QUICK CRETE PROOUCTS IN 70260 07/12/01 001416 QUICK CRETE PROOUCTS IN 70261 07/12/01 004272 RANCHO ARMY NAVY 70261 07/12/01 004272 RANCHO ARMY NAVY 70262 07/12/01 000262 70262 07/12/01 000262 70262 07/12/01 000262 70262 07/12/01 000262 70262 07/12/01 000262 70262 07/12/01 000262 70262 07/12/01 000262 70262 07/12/01 000262 70262 07/12/01 000262 70262 07/12/01 000262 70262 07/12/01 000262 70262 07/12/01 000262 70262 07/12/01 000262 70262 07/12/01 000262 70262 07/12/01 000262 70263 07/12/01 70263 07/12/01 7026~ 07/12/01 70265 07/12/01 70266 07/12/01 70267 07/12/01 70267 07/12/01 70268 07/12/01 70268 0~/12/01 70268 07/12/01 70268 07/12/01 70268 07/12/01 70268 07/12/01 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST RANCMO CALIF WATER DIST RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST RANCHO CALIF WATER DIBT RANCHO CALIF WATER DIBT RANCHO CALIF WATER OIST RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST RANCHO CAL1F WATER DIST RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST RANCHO CALIE WATER OIST RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH RANCHO ELEMENTARY SCHO0 RANCHO RUNNERS 003591 RENES COMMERCIAL MANAGE 002110 RENTAL SERVICE CORPORAT 002110 RENTAL SERVICE CORPORAT 004498 REPUBLIC ELECTRIC 004498 REPUBLIC ELECTRIC 004498 REPUBLIC ELECTRIC 004498 REPUBLIC ELECTRIC 004498 REPUBLIC ELECTRIC 004498 REPUBLIC ELECTRIC CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION PETTY CASH REINBURSEHENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASM REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT VARIOUS RECRUITMENT ADS FOR HR VARIOUS RECRUITMENT ADS FOR HR CONTAINERS:EXTRM.RECYCLING PRG SALES TAX 10X15 CANOPY FOR FIRE PREV.USE 10X10 CANOPY FOR FIRE PREV USE JUL 01'08-00035-0 HWY 79S JUL 01'08-00038-1 PALA RD dUN 01-06-8~860-5 PUdOL ST JUN 01-02-98000-0 STN ~ dUN 01-02-98010-0 STN ~ VARIOUS WATER METERS VARIOUS WATER METERS VARIOUS WATER METERS VARIOUS WATER METERS VARIOUS WATER METERS VARIOUS WATER METERS VARIOUS WATER BETERB VARIOUS WATER METERS VARIOUS WATER METERS VARIOUS WATER METERS CITY VEHICLE DETAILING & GAS CITY VEHICLE DETAILING & GAS REFUND:SEC DEP MS01-0734 CITY ATTORNEY COURIER SVCS:7/3 WEED ABATEMENT:VARIOUS PARKS EQUIPMENT RENTAL-PW HAINT CREW EQUIPMENT RENTAL-PW MAINT CREW PRGS PMT:TRAF SGNL CONVERSION C/O PRGS PMT:TRAF SGNL CONVERS C/O PRGS PMT:LED CONVERSION RET.W/H PMT:LEO CONVERSION CREDIT:BILLING ERROR:PW01-03 REVERSE RETENTION FOR CREDIT ACCOUNT NUMBER 190-183-999-5320 190-183-999-5320 190-183-999-5340 190-183-999-5340 190-183-999-5370 190-187-999-5301 001-140-999-5250 190-180-999-5254 001-165-999-5254 194-180-999-5265 194-180-999-5265 001-171-999-5242 001-171-999-5242 001-165-999-5250 001-165-999-5250 280-199-807-5801 001-171-999-5240 001-171-999-5240 190-180-999-5240 190-181-999-5240 190-182-999-5240 190-184-999-5240 190'186-999-5240 193-180-999-5240 340-199-701-5240 190-185-999-5240 190-180-999-5240 193-180-999-5240 001-110-999~5214 001-110-999-5263 190-2900 001-110-999-5230 190-180-999-5250 001-16~-601-5238 001-164-601-5238 210-165-618-5804 210-165-618-5804 210-165-618-5804 210-2035 210-165-618-5804 210-2035 ITEM' AMOUNT 33.54 49.33 11.21 27.78 8.59 12.22 22.01 526.16 692.64 531.00 39.83 752.50 268.7~ 207.64 514.29 9.62 290.95 10,365.41 126.09 874.49 321.31 188.65 1,657.56 450,22 55.46 1,467.79 lf848.77 28.00 107.70 100.00 110.00 4,520.00 53.76 65.60 278,127.14 26,328.35 36,000.00 34,045.55- 9,141.94- 914.19 PAGE CHECK AMOUNT 164.68 1,218.80 570.83 1,021.23 18,420.98 135.70 100.00 110.00 4,520.00 119.36 298,182.19 VOUCBRE2 07/12/01 16:18 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK HUMBER DATE 70269 07/12/01 70270 07/12/01 70271 07/12/01 70272 07/12/01 702?3 07/12/01 7O2?3 07/12/01 70274 07/12/01 70274 07/12/01 70274 07/12/01 70274 07/12/01 70274 07/12/01 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VENDOR NUMBER 000411 000268 001592 RIVERSIDE CO INFO TECHN 001309 RUSE, PHYLLIS VENDOR ITEM NAME DESCRIPTION RIVERSIDE CO FLOOD CONT APR PLAN CHECK FEES - PALA RD RIVERSIDE CO NAD[TAT JUNE 2001 K-BAT PAYMENT 4 NEW EMERG. RADIOS:P,D, RE/MB:LIB.BOND HEARING:6-25-01 000277 S & S ARTS & CRAFTS IRC TCSD RECREATION SUPPLIES 000277 S & S ARTS & CRAFTS INC MISC CRAFT SUPPLIES-CRC 001942 S C SIGNS JUN POSTING PUBL.NTCS:PLANNING 001942 S C SIGNS JUN NEW SIGN CONSTR-PLANNING 001942 S C SIGNS 001942 S C SIGNS 001942 S C SIGNS 70275 07/12/01 001288 70276 07/12/01 70276 07/12/01 70276 07/12/01 70276 07/12/01 70276 07/12/01 70276 07/12/01 JUN NEW SIGN CONSTR-CITY CLERK MAy POSTING PUBL NTCS:PLANNING MAY POSTING PUBL.NTCS:PLANNING SAN DIEGO BUSINESS JOUR ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTION:WOLNICK 004562 SCHIRMER ENGINEERING CO HAy PLAN CK SVCS:B01-0599 004562 SCNIRMER ENGINEERING CO HAY PLAN CK SVC$:PAO0-0417 004562 SCRIRMER ENGINEERING CO MAy PLAN CK SVCS:800-1084 004562 SCHIRMER ENGINEERING CO MAy PLAN CK SVCS:800-2200 004562 SCHIRMER ENGINEERING CO HAy PLAN CK SVCS:B00-2647 004562 SCHIRMER ENGINEERING CO MAy PLAN CE SVCS:B00-1922 70277 07/12/01 000697 70278 07/12/01 70278 07/12/01 SISTER CITIES INTERNATI CITY ANNUAL MBRSHP DUES 2001 70279 07/12/01 70279 07/12/01 70279 07/12/01 70279 07/12/01 70279 07/12/01 70279 07/12/01 7O279 07/12/01 70279 07/12/01 70279 07/12/01 70279 07/12/01 70279 07/12/01 7O279 07/12/01 70279 07/12/01 7O280 07/12/01 7O280 07/12/01 70280 07/12/01 70281 07/12/01 70281 07/12/01 000645 SMART & FINAL INC 000645 SMART & FINAL INC 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000537 SO CALIF EOISON 000537 SO CAL[F EDISON 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000537 SO CALIF EDZSON 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 000537 SO CALIF EDISON RECREATION CLASS SUPPLIES RECREATION CLASS SUPPLIES JUL 2-17-214-0428 MEADOWS PKWY JUL 2-06-I05-0654 VARIOUS HTRS JUL 2-10-331-1353 STN ~ JUL 2-18-363-1902 PAUBA RD JUN 2'10-331-2153 TCC JUN 2-19~558-2262 VARIOUS MTRS JUN 2-20-798-3248 VARIOUS MTRS JUN 2-19-683-3255 FRONT ST PEO JUL 2-02-351-5281 CRC JUL 2-02-351-5281 CRC JUL 2-01-202-7330 VARIOUS MTRS JUL 2-01-202-7605ARTERIAL STLT JUN 2~05-791-8807 VARIOUS MTRS 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR CITY HALL PEST CONTROL SERVICE 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR CRC PEST CONTBOL SERVICES 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR MAINT FAC PEST CONTROL SVCS 004420 STATE CO~tP INSURANCE FU JUNE WORKERS~ COMP PREMIUM 004420 STATE COMp INSURANCE FU JUNE WORKERS~ COMP PREMIUM ACCOUNT NUMBER 210-165-605-5802 001-2300 001-170-999-5238 190-180-999-5260 190-183-~9-53~ 190'182-999-5301 001-161-999-5256 001-161-999-5256 001-120-999-5244 001-161-999-5256 001-161-999-5256 001-111-999-5228 001-171-999-5250 001-171-999-5250 001-171-999-5250 001-171-9~9-5250 001-171-999-5250 001-171-999-5250 001-101-999-5280 190'183-~9-5370 190'183-~-53~ 190-180-999-5319 190-180-999-5319 001-171-999-5240 190-180-999-5319 190-184-999-5240 190'180-999~5240 190-180-999-5240 001-164-603-5319 190-182-999-5240 190-186-999-5240 190-180-999-5319 190-180-999-5319 190-1~0 340'199-701-5250 190'182-999-5250 340-199-702-5250 001-2370 165-2370 ITEM AHOUNT 241.95 2,936,92 120.00 51.00 96.10 450.65 325.00 1,450.00 1,450.00 125.00 525.00 ~.00 200.00 300.00 200.00 400.00 400.00 400.00 380.00 253.93 27.84 43.61 2,101.57 1,520.25 27.27 1,319,60 89.41 216.05 459.60 6,024.59 1,845.34 33,434.18 13,468.50 137.33 56.00 90.00 40.00 5,392.49 134.78 PAGE CHECK AMOUNT 241.95 2,936.92 120.OD 51.00 546.73 3,875.00 79.00 1,900.00 380.00 281.77 60,687.30 186.00 VOUCHRE2 07/12/01 16:18 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION 70281 07/12/01 004420 70281 07/12/01 004420 70281 07/12/01 004420 70281 07/12/01 004420 70281 07/12/01 004420 70281 07/12/01 004420 70281 07/12/01 004420 70281 07/12/01 004420 70281 07/12/01 004420 70281 07/12/01 004420 70282 07/12/01 000305 70282 07/12/01 000305 70282 07/12/01 000305 70282 07/12/01 000305 70283 07/12/01 70284 07/12/01 70284 07/12/01 70284 07/12/01 70285 07/12/01 70286 07/12/01 70286 07/12/01 70286 07/12/01 70287 07/12/01 STATE COMP INSURANCE FU JUNE WORKERS~ STATE COMP INSURANCE FU JUNE WORKERS~ STATE COMp INSURANCE FU JUNE ~ORKERS~ STATE COMp INSURANCE FU JUNE ~ORKERS~ STATE COMP INSURANCE FU JUNE WORKERS~ STATE COMP INSURANCE FU JUNE ~ORKERS~ STATE COMP INSURANCE FU JUNE WORKERS~ STATE COMP INSURANCE FU JUNE WORKERS' STATE COMP INSURANCE FU JUNE WORKERS~ STATE COMP INSURANCE FU JUNE WORKERS~ COMP PREMIUM COMP PREMIUM COMP PREMIUM COMP PREMIUM COMP PREMIUM COMP PREMIUM COMP PREMIUM COMP PREMIUM COMP PREMIUM COMP PREMIUM TARGET STORE TARGET STORE TARGET STORE TARGET STORE 000168 TEMECULA FLOWER CORRAL TCSD RECREATION SUPPLIES MISC SUPPLIES FOR SMART PROM RECREATION SUPPLIES FOR TCC RECREATION SUPPLIES-AQUATICS SUNSHINE FUND 000307 TEMECULA TROPHY COMPANY MEMORIAL PLAQUE:D,NOGAN 000307 TEMECULA TROPNY COMPANY SALES TAX 000307 TEMECULA TROPHY COMPANY PLAQUES/RIBBONS:JUL 4TH PARADE 000306 TEMECULA VALLEY PIPE & VAR PARKS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 004274 TEMECULA VALLEY SECURIT EMERG LOCKSMITH SVCS FOR PARKS 004274 TEMECULA VALLEY SECURIT CRC LOCKSMITH SERVICES 004274 TEMECULA VALLEY SECURIT EMERG LOCKSMITH SVCS:K.H. PARK 003140 TEMECULA VALLEY TAERt~3N TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 70288 07/12/01 003633 70288 07/12/01 003633 70288 07/12/01 003633 70288 07/12/01 003633 70288 07/12/01 003633 70288 07/12/01 003633 70288 07/12/01 003633 70288 07/12/01 003633 70288 07/12/01 003633 70288 07/12/01 003633 70288 07/12/01 003633 70288 07/12/01 003633 70288 07/12/01 003633 70288 07/12/01 003633 70288 07/12/01 003633 70289 07/12/01 70289 07/12/01 70289 07/12/01 70289 07/12/01 TOLL ROADS, THE TOLL ROAOS, THE TOLL ROADS, THE TOLL ROADS, THE TOLL ROADS, THE TOLL ROADS, THE TOLL ROADS, THE TOLL RO~J)S, THE TOLL ROADS, THE TOLL ROADS, THE TOLL ROADS, THE TOLL ROADS, THE TOLL ROADS, THE TOLL ROADS, THE TOLL ROADS, THE TOLL ROAD USAGE TOLL ROAD USAGE TOLL ROAD USAGE TOLL ROAD USAGE TOLL ROAD USAGE TOLL ROAD USAGE TOLL ROAD USAGE TOLL ROAD USAGE TOLL ROAD USAGE TOLL ROAD USAGE FASTRAK USAGE FASTRAK USAGE FASTRAK USAGE FASTRAK USAGE FASTRAK USAGE 003858 TOM RONEY ROOFING 003858 TOM RONEY ROUFING 003858 TOM RONEY ROOFING 003858 TOM RONEY ROOFING CREDIT:HOMEOWNER'S PMT PORTION RES IMPRV PROM: MART RES IMPRV PRGM: JOHNSON RES IMPRV PRGM: VANCE ACCOUNT NUMBER 190-2370 192-2370 193-2370 194-2370 280-2370 300-2370 320-2370 330-2370 340-2370 001-1182 190-18~-999-5372 190-183-999-5372 190-184-99~~5301 190-186-999-5301 001-2170 190-180-999-5250 190-180-999-5250 190-183-999-5370 190-180-999-5212 190-180-999-5250 190-182-999-5212 190"180-999-5250 190-183-999-5330 001-171-999-5214 001-162-999-5214 001-140-999-5250 001-101-999-5280 001-110-999-5214 190-180-999-5214 001-161-999-5214 001-163-999-5214 001-120-999-5250 340-199-701-5214 001-120-999-5250 001-140-999-5250 190-180-999-5214 001-161-499-5214 340-199-701-5214 165-199-813-5804 165-199-813-5804 165-199-813-5804 165-199-813-5804 ITEM AMOUNT 2,041.41 1.06 91.72 15.79 49.03 11.00 127.54 25.29 312.26 63.59 130.69 146.00 26.77 153.56 164.32 246.00 18.45 686.47 67.41 26.32 65.00 68.81 436.80 10.20 7.50 4.50 3.50 1.00 18.55 16.65 1.25 10.30 8.25 5.10 8.28 6.50 4.75 2.00 75.00- 5,000.00 3,650.00 775.00 PAGE 9 CHECK AMOUNT 8,265.96 457.02 164.32 950.92 67.41 160.13 436.80 108.33 9,350.00 VOUCNRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 10 07/12/01 16:18 VOUCRER/CNECK REGISTER FOR ALL PEHIOOS VOUCHER/ CHECK HUMBER 70290 7O291 70291 70292 70293 70294 70294 70294 70294 70294 70294 70295 70295 70296 70297 70298 70299 70299 70299 70299 CHECK DATE 07/12/01 07/12/01 07/12/01 07/12/01 07/12/01 07/12/01 07/12/01 07/12/01 07/12/01 07/12/01 07/12/01 07/12/01 07/12/01 07/12/01 07/12/01 07/12/01 07/12/01 07/12/01 07/12/01 07/12/01 VENDOR NUMBER 000320 004542 004542 VENDOR NAME TONNE CENTER STATIONERS TRUGREEN LAND CARE TRUGREEN LAND CARE VAIL ELEMENTARY PTA 000332 VANDORPE CHOU ASSOCIATE 004261 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 004261 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 004261 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 004261 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 004261 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 004261 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 004279 VERIZON CALIFORNIA INC. 004279 VERIZON CALIFORNIA INC. 002658 VOLLNUTH, MARY 003730 WEST COAST ARBORISTS IN 002109 WHITE CAP INDUSTRIES IN 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI 000345 XEROX CORPORATION 81LLI 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR B&S LDSCP MAINT. - LOHA LINDA PARK INSTALL 2 BKFLW ENCLOSURES-O.T REFUND: SEC DEP MS01-0912 001-162-999-5220 190-180-999-5416 001-164-603-5212 190-2900' PLAN CHECK SVCS VAN DORPE 001-162-999-5240 JUN XXX-1289 PRATT JUN XXX-1408 PD SATELLITE STN JUN XXX-2629 RAGGAR JUN XXX-2670 911 AUTO DIALER JUN XXX-3539 GENERAL USAGE JUN XXX-5509 GENERAL USAGE 320-199-999-5208 001-170-999-5229 320-199-999-5208 320'199-999-5208 320-199-999-5208 320-199-999-5208 JUL ACCESS-CRC OPEN PHONE LINE 320-199-999-5208 JUL ACCESS-RVSD CO OPEN LINE 320-199-999-5208 EMP PICNIC RECOGN AWARDS 001-150-999-5265 CITYWIDE TREE RAINT SERVICES 001-164-601-5402 SUPPLIES FOR PW MAINT CREWS 001-164-601-5218 JUN LEASE DCCS 50 COPIER 330-2800 JUN INTEREST DCCS 50 COPIER 330-199-999-5391 JUN DCCS 50 COPIER USAGE 330-199-999-5217 JUN ADD~L OCCS 50 COPIER USAGE 330-199-999-5217 ITEM AMOUNT 189.62 1,325.00 2,382.50 100.00 3,161.32 34.00 334.00 38.91 28.38 38.22 130.42 342.02 342.02 250.00 3,471.00 142.99 294.72 226.62 1,157.12 '~7.72 CHECK AMOUNT 189.62 3,707.50 100.00 3,161.32 603.93 684.04 250.00 3~471,00 142.99 2,416.18 TOTAL CHECKS 556,967.27 07/13/01 15:48 FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 340 FACILITIES CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS AMOUNT 1,490,904.58 104,663.65 32,660.50 346,028.64 11,081.54 541.00 PAGE 3 TOTAL 1,985,879.91 VOUCRRE2 07/13/01 15:48 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE 1 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME 70302 07/24/01 000434 ACCELA.COM 70303 07/24/01 004547 ALLEN INSTRUMENTS & SUP 70304 07/24/01 003376 ARTS COUNCIL, THE 70304 07/24/01 003376 ARTS COUNCIL, THE 70305 07/24/01 000622 BANTA ELECTRIC-REFRIGER 70306 07/24/01 004294 DIVERSIFIED LANDSCAPE C 70306 07/24/01 004294 DIVERSIFIED LANDSCAPE C 70307 07/24/01 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 70307 07/24/01 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 70307 07/24/01 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 70307 07/24/01 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 70307 07/24/01 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 70307 07/24/01 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 70307 07/24/01 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 70307 07/24/01 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 70307 07/24/01 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 70307 07/24/01 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 70307 07/24/01 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 70307 07/24/01 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 70307 07/24/01 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 70307 07/24/01 001056 EXCEL LANOSCAPE 70307 07/24/01 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 70307 07/24/01 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 70307 07/24/01 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 70307 07/24/01 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 70307 07/24/01 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 70307 07/24/01 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 70308 07/24/01 70309 07/24/01 70310 07/24/01 70311 07/24/01 004019 GOLDEN STATE FENCE COMP 004540 KELLERS ELECTRIC 003286 LIBRARY SYSTEMS & SERVI 003253 PACIFIC TECHNICAL SERVI 70312 07/24/01 003218 PELA 70313 07/24/01 70313 07/24/01 004515 PLASTIC LUMBER COMPANY 004515 PLASTIC LUMBER COMPANY 70314 07/24/01 004457 R J NOBLE COMPANY 70314 07/24/01 004457 R J NOBLE COMPANY ITEM DESCRIPTION UORKFLCR~ MNTC:PERMIT PLUS GOLD SURVEY/MAPPING INSTRUMENT:GIB COMMUNITY GRANT AGREEMENT CREDIT:INVOICE EXCEEDS AGREMNT ACCOUNT NUMBER 320-199-999-5211 001-161-610-5604 190-180-999-5286 190-180-999-5286 REHAB RETROFIT LIGHTING:SR CTR 190-1990 RETENTION JUN SVC:PALA LDSCP JUN SVC:PALA BRDG LDSCP P~9715 JUN LDSCP IMPR:O.TWN PLANTING JUN LDSCP SVCS:NEIGHBORH~ PK JUN LDSCP SVCS:SPORTS PARK dUN LDSCP SVCS:MEDIANS dUN LDSCP SVCS:SOUTH SLOPES JUN LDSCP SVCS:NONTH SLOPES dUN LDSCP SVCS: CRC JUN LDSCP SVCS:SR CENTER JUN LDSCP SVCS:C.HALL/MNTC FAC JUN LDSCP SVCS: TCC JUN LDSCP SVCB: STATION 8/+ JUN LDSCP SVCS:OLD TUN PRKLOT JUN LDSCP SVCS:OLD TUN STRSCPE JUN LDSCP SVCS:MUSEUM JUN LDSCP SVCS=NEIGHBORHOOO PX JUN LDSCP SVCS:CHILDREN MUSEUM JUN LDSCP SVCS=PALA RD BRDG JUN LDSCP SVCS:OLD TUN PBXLOTB JUN LDSCP SVCS:NADA FLOOD CNTR MAY LDSCP SVCS:PALA RD BRIDGE INSTALL IRON FENCE:S.H]CK PARK TRAFFIC SIGNAL PUR BACKUP SYS JUN SVCS-LIBRJ~Ry SYSTEM AGRMT IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT:SPRTS PRK JUN PLANNING DPT PLAN CHECK SV STREET NAME SIGN REPLACEMENTS SALES TAX PRGS PMT#2:MARG RD IMPRV:99-01 RET.~/H PMT#2:MARG RD IMPRV 210-2035 210-165-631-5804 001-164-603-5416 190-180-999-5415 190-180-999-5415 193-180-999-5415 193-180-999-5415 193-180-999-5415 190-182-999-5415 190-181-999-5415 340-199-701-5415 190-184-999-5415 001-171-999-5212 001-164-603-5415 001-164-603-5415 190-185-999-5415 190-180-999-5415 190-180-999-5415 190-180-999-5415 001-164-603-5415 190-180-999-5415 190-180-999-5415 190-180-999-5212 001-164-602-5412 00%101-999-5285 190-180-999-5610 001-161-999-5250 001-164-602-5412 001-164-602-5412 210-165-706-5804 210-2035 ITEM AMOUNT 11,081.54 16,497.70 10,002.00 8.00- 7,677.90 5,625.40- 56,254.00 5,419.20 11,635.00 25,325.00 1,975.00 13,375.00 8,878.00 1,444.00 361.00 541.00 193.00 400.00 250.00 987.00 285.00 1,000.00 155.00 150.00 250.00 165.00 150.00 6,954.00 24,596.00 10,549.30 15,401.25 5,410.00 12,081.60 906.12 328,222.26 32,822.22- CHECK AMOUNT 11,081.54 16,497.70 9,994.00 7,677.90 50,628.60 72,938.20 6,954.00 24,596.00 10,549.30 15,401.25 5,410.00 12,987.72 295,400.04 70315 07/24/01 000267 RIVERSIDE CO FIRE DEPAR 2ND QTR FYO0-01 FIRE SERVICES 001-171-999-5251 437,289.80 70315 07/24/01 000267 RIVERSIDE CO FIRE DEPAR 4TH QTR ESTIMATE FIRE SERVICES 001-171-999-5251 437,289.80 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA PAGE 2 07/13/01 15:48 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 7O315 70316 70317 70317 70317 70317 70317 70317 70317 70317 70317 70317 70317 70317 70317 70317 70317 70317 70317 70317 70317 70317 70317 70318 70318 70318 70319 70319 70320 70320 CHECK VENDOR VENDOR DATE NUMBER NAME 07/24/01 07/24/01 07/24/01 07/24/01 07/24/01 07/24/01 07/24/01 07/24/01 07/24/01 07/24/01 07/24/01 07/24/01 07/24/01 07/24/01 07/24/01 07/24/01 07/24/01 07/24/01 07/24/01 07/24/01 07/24/01 07/24/01 07/24/01 07/24/01 07/24/01 07/24/01 07/24/01 07/24/01 07/24/01 07/24/01 000267 RIVERSIDE CO FIRE DEPAR 000955 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFF SW 000406 000406 000406 000406 000406 000406 000406 000406 000406 000406 000406 000406 000406 000406 000406 000406 000406 000406 000406 000406 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D R]VERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D RIVERS[DE CO SHERIFFS D RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D RIVERSIDE CO SRERIFFS D RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS D 004542 TRUGREEN LAND CARE 004542 TRUGREEN LAND CARE 004542 TRUGREEN LAND CARE 004368 VALI COOPER & ASSOCIATE 004368 VALI COOPER & ASSOCIATE 003730 WEST COAST ARSOR]STS IN 003730 NEST COAST ARBORISTS IN ITEM ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION NUMBER CRDT:4TH QTR ESTIMATE FYO0-01 001-171-999-5251 ST.PAINT FEST.PATROL SVC:6/2-3 001-170-999-5370 04/05-05/02/01 LAW ENFORCEMENT 001-170-999-5288 04/05-05/02/01 LAW ENFORCEMENT 001-170-999-5299 04/05-05/02/01 LAW ENFORCEMENT 001-170-999-5298 04/05-05/02/01 LAW ENFORCEMENT 001-170-999-5294 04/05-05/02/01 LAW ENFORCEMENT 001-170-999-5297 04/05-05/02/01 LAW ENFORCEMENT 001-170-999-5303 04/05-05/02/01 LAW ENFORCEMENT 001-170-999-5291 04/05-05/02/01 LAW ENFORCEMENT 001'170-999-5281 04/05-05/02/01 LAW ENFORCEMENT 001-170-999-5262 04/05-05/02/01 LAW ENFORCEMENT 001-170-999-5279 MAY 2001 BOOKING FEES 5/03-5/30/01 LAW ENFORCEMENT 5/03-5/30/01 LAW ENFORCEMENT 5/03-5/30/01 LAN ENFORCEMENT 5/03-5/30/01 LAW ENFORCEMENT 5/03-5/30/01 LAW ENFORCEMENT 5/03-5/30/01 LAW ENFORCEMENT 5/03-5/30/01 LAW ENFORCEMENT 5/03-5/30/01 LAW ENFORCEMENT 5/03-5/30/01 LAN ENFORCEMENT 5/03-5/30/01 LAN ENFORCEMENT 001-170-999-5273 001-170-999-5288 001-170-999-5299 001-170-99<2-5298 001-170-999-5294 001-170-999-5297 001-170-999-5303 001-170-999-5291 001-170-999-5281 001-170-999-5262 001-170-999-5279 CREDIT:BILLING ERROR:MARG PRK CREDIT:BILLING ERROR:MARG PRK MARG PARK CHANNEL CLEARING HAY TEMP INSPECT SVCS:HOFFMAN MAY TEMP INSPECT SVCS:HOFFHAN 190-180-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 001-165-999-5118 001-165-999-5118 TREE MAINTENANCE SVCS:PARKS 190-180-999-5415 TREE MAINTENANCE SVCS:SLOPES 193-180-999-5415 ITEM AMOUNT 437,289.80- 5,004.60 238,180.80 82,791.60 20,905.60 10,723.40 16,003.20 20,905.60 13,680.00 39,402.56 24,216.87 9,206.95 10,819.20 235,012.69 83,455.30 20,905.60 10,441.88 16,003.20 20,905.60 12,996.00 40,234.16 21,833.18 6,610.62 5,000.00- 1,579.00- 20,900.00 1,272.86 14,756.39 9,452.50 8,432.50 CHECK AMOUNT 437,289.80 5,004.60 955,234.01 14,321~00 16,029.25 17,885.00 TOTAL CHECKS 1,985,879.91 ITEM 4 APPROVAL ~ CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE DIRECTOR CITY MANAGER ~ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Manager/City Council Genie Roberts, Director of Finance ~f~ July 24, 2001 Financial Statements for the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2001 PREPARED BY: Tim McDermott, Assistant Finance Director~''~ Pascale Brown, Senior Accountant ~ RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive and file the Financial Statements for the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2001. DISCUSSION: The attached financial statements reflect the unaudited activity of the City for the Nine months ended March 31, 2001. Please see the attached financial statements for an analytical review of financial activity. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: Combining Balance Sheet as of March 31, 2001 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance for the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2001 Combining Balance Sheet (Internal Service Funds) as of March 31, 2001 Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Retained Earnings (Internal Service Funds) for the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2001 Combining Balance Sheet (Community Facilities Districts) as of March 31, 2001 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance (Community Facilities Districts) for the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2001 CITY OF TEMECULA Combining Balance Sheet as of March 31, 2001 and the Statements of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance For The Nine Months Ended March 31, 2001 and the Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Retained Earnings For The Nine Months Ended March 31, 2001 (Unaudited) Prepared by the Finance Department City of Temeanla Combining Balance Sheet As of March 31, 2001 Cash and investments Receivables Due from other funds Advances to other funds Deposits Land held for resale Total assets Liabilities and fund balances: Liabilities: Due to other funds Other currant liabilities Deferred revenue Total liabilities Fund balances: Reserved Designated Undesignated Total fund balances Total liabilities and fund balances State General Gas Tax Transportation Der Impact Fund Fund Fund Fund CDBG Fund $ 17,321,145 $ 388,602 $ 7,592,557 3,656,719 $ 101,742 5,289 176,437 7,987 2,721,917 19,256 530,401 24,249,438 $ 101,742 393,891 $ 7,776,981 19,220 5,520,134 444,938 5,984,292 78,450 78,450 4,065,804 9,378,766 $ 101,742 4,820,576 18,265,146 101,742 393,891 7,698,531 393,891 7,698,531 $ 24,249,438 $ 101,742 393,891 $ 7,776,981 City of Temecula Combining Balance Sheet As of March 31, 2001 Assets: Cash and investments Receivables Due from other funds Advances to other fimds Deposits Land held for resale Total assets Liabilities and fund balances: Liabilities: Due to other fimds Other current liabilities Deferred revenue Total liabilities Fund balances: Reserved Designated Undesignated Total fund balances Total liabilities and fund balances Marg Rd AB 2766 Measure "A" C1P Reim Dist Fund Fund Fund Fund $ 24,621 $ 2,709,903 $ 13,177,645 $ 14,611 185,981 2,363,401 377,500 $ 39,232 $ 2,895,884 $ 9,282 $ 41,223,755 6,504,180 7,987 2,721,917 396,756 530~01 15,918,546 $ 9,282 $ 51,384,996 $ 7,987 $ 27,2O7 47,114 $ 3,474,{M8 1,295 9,042,591 523,388 47,114 3,474,048 9,282 9,593,186 $ 39,232 2,848,770 4,854,360 8,920,164 7,590,138 28,051,070 4,820,576 39,232 2,848,770 12,444,498 $ 39,232 $ 2,895,88~ $ 15,918,546 $ 41,791,810 9,282 $ 51,384,99~6 City of Temecula Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual General Fund For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2001 Annual Amended YTD _ Budget Activity Sales tax Developmental services: $ 15,700,000 $ 12,044,339 Planning Building & safety 458,500 396,397 Land development 1,887,700 1,467,843 Fire 1,100,000 807,407 Grants 214,000 155,173 AB3229 (COPS) 167,868 168,593 Motor vehicle in lieu 116,900 116,791 Property lax 2,602,900 2,060,749 Property transfer tax 1,934,000 1,146,321 Franchise fees 385,000 267,506 Transient occupancy tax 1,367,000 795,313 Reimbursements 1,350,000 959,008 Reimbursements from TCSD 394,800 379,489 Reimbursements from RDA 162,000 121,500 Reimbursements from CI? 225,000 168,750 Investment interest 1,055,690 542,985 Business licenses 1,178,000 1,167,017 Vehicle code £mes 205,000 186,595 Miscellaneous 325,000 220,887 Parking citations/impound fees 70,000 42,945 Operating transfers in 90,300 75,630 1,015,700 669,632 Total Revenues $ 32,005,358 $ 23,960,870 Percent of Budget 77% 86% (1) 78% 73% 73% 100% 100% 79% 59% (2) 69% 58% (3) 71% 96% 75% 75% 51% (4) 99% (5) 91% (6) 68% 61% 84% 66% 75% City o£ Tcmccul~ Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual General Fund For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2001 Annual Amended YTD Expenditures: Budget Activity City Council $ 282,210 Community Support 477,138 City Manager 619,731 Economic Development 805,580 City Clerk City Attorney 598,900 Finance 387,500 Human Resources 1,111,141 335,290 Planning 2,653,211 Building & Safety 1,788,990 Land Development 1,137,601 Public Works CIP Admln 4,172,119 Police 1,507,110 Fire Dept 7,440,135 Animal Control 2,581,576 110,000 Non-departmental 3,259,000 Total Expenditures (Excluding Transfers) Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures Operating Transfers Out Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures and Operating Transfers Beginning Fund Balance, July l, 2000 Ending Fund Balance, March 3 l, 2001 29,267,232 Eneumbr. YTD Activity + Eneurnbr $ 199,810 $ 1,205 $ 201,015 323,516 102,119 425,635 436,475 11,646 448,121 573,915 15,374 589,289 401,506 9,569 411,075 289,878 289,878 754,969 17,599 772,568 233,312 6,027 239,339 1,409,715 155,904 1,565,619 1,209,163 78,258 1,287,421 636,511 12,293 648,804 2,184,221 363,193 2,547,414 902,001 21,844 923,845 4,802,264 47,148 4,849,412 1,809,790 17,173 1,826,963 71;521 71,521 2,512,999 __ 2,512,999 18,751,566 859,352 . 19,610,918 2,738,126 5,209,304 4,087,200 4,055,000 (1,349,074) 1,154,304 -. 17,110,842 17,110,842 $ 15,761,768 $ 18,265,146 of Bud~ct 71% 89% 72% 73% 69% 75% 70% 71% 59% (7) 72% 57% (8) 61% 61% 65% 71% 65% 77% 67% (1) The variance in planning revenue is due mainly to several specific plans being processed during the current fiscal year. (2) Property tax revenue is received primarily in January and May each year. (3) The variance in franchise fee revenue is due to several entities that have annual payments due in the last quarter of the fiscal year. (4) The variance is due primarily to lower than anticipated costs being incurred for the administration of CIP projects. (5) The variance in investment interest is due to higher than anticipated cash and investment balances being maintained. (6) The variance in business license revenue is due to the annual renewal process which occurs in December and January each year. (7) The variance in Planning is due to the General Plan update which had not yet begun as of March 31. (8) The variance in Land Development is due to personnel cost savings. City of Temecula Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget end Actual Gas Tax Fund For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2001 Annual Amended YTD Revenues: Budget Activity Section 2105-2107 $ 1,008,200 $ 761,480 Investment interest 7,500 9,894 Total Revenues Expenditures: Operating transfers out Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 2000 Ending Fund Balance, March 31, 2001 1,015,700 771,374 1,015,700 669,632 101,742 $ $ 101,742 Total Percent Encumbr. Activity of Budget $ 761,480 9,894 771,374 669,632 76% 132% 76% 66% City of Temecula Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual State Transportation Fond For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2001 Amlual Amended YTD Revenues: Budget Activity Investment interest $ 10,000 $ 10,479 Traffic congestion relief 383,000 383,412 Total Revenues Expenditures: Operating transfers out Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 2000 Ending Fund Balance, March 31, 2001 393,000 393,891 393,000 393,891 393,000 $ 393,89~1 Total Percent Encumbr. Activity of Budget $ 10,479 383,412 393,891 105% 100% 100% City of Temecula Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual Development Impact Fund For the Nme Months Ended March 31, 2001 Annual Amended YTD Budl~et Activity Quimby $ 81,900 $ 31,018 Street improvements 1,883,800 716,757 Traffic signals 341,800 147,345 Parks 1,059,800 920,950 Corporate facilities 313,300 249,148 Fire protection 103,800 63,577 Library 258,200 226,235 Public facilities 17,244 Investment interest 369,400 Total Revenues Expenditures: Operating transfers out 4,042,600 2,741,674 8,157,900 1,892,359 Revenues Over/(lJnder) Expenditures (4,115,300) 849,315 Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 2000 6,849,216 .. 6,849,216 Ending Fund Balance, March 31,2001 $ 2,733,916 $ 7,698,531 Total Percent Encumbr. Activity of Budl~et $ 31,018 716,757 147,345 920,950 249,148 63,577 226,235 17,244 369,400 2,741,674 1,892,359 38% 38% (1) 43% (1) 87% 80% 61% (1) 88% 68% 23% (2) (1) The variance is due to the timing of fees collected on non-residential development, and due to fee credits given for assessment district improvements. (2) T;ar; .Vm72eC~ in °perating transfers out is due to the timing of when DIF funded projects are started and costs City of Temecula Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual Community Development Block Grant For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2001 Grant revenue Total Revenues Expenditures: Annual Amended YTD Budget Activity $ 735,700 $ 7,709 735,700 7,709 Total Percent Encumbr. Activity of Budget $ 7,709 7,709 Other outside services Operating transfers out Total Expenditures Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures Beginn/ng Fund Balance, July 1, 2000 Ending Fund Balance, March 31, 2001 45,700 686,300 7,709 732,000 7,709 3,700 $ 3,700 $ 7,709 7,709 (1) The variance is prflnarily due to the Senior Center Expansion project which has not yet been started, and the Sports Park Tot Lot Upgrade project for which the CDBG reimbursemant had not been received by March 31. 1% 0) 1% ]% (l) 1% City of Temecula Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual AB 2766 Fund For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2001 AB 2766 $ 41,000 $ 42,497 Investment interest 1,715 Total Revenues 41,000 44,212 Expenditures: Operating transfers out 38,400 38,400 Total Expenditures 38,400 38,400 Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures 2,600 5,812 Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 2000 33,420 33,420 Ending Fund Balance, March 31,200I $ 36.020 $ 39,232 Annual Amended YTD Total Perceut Budget Activity Encumbr. Activity of Budget $ 42,497 1.715 44512 38,400 38,400 104% 108% 100% 100% City of Temecula Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual Measure "A" For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2001 Annual Amended YTD Revenues: Budget Activity Encumbr. Total Activity Measure "A" $ 1,298,000 $ 1,280,137 Investment interest 104,020 Total Revenues 1,298,000 1,384,157 Expenditures: $ 1,280,137 104,020 1,384,157 Debt service - principal Debt service - interest Operating transfers out Total Expenditures Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 2000 Ending Fund Balance, March 31,2001 382,036 285,566 183,344 138,460 2,501,000 5,000 3,066,380 429,026 (1,768,380) 955,131 1,893,639 1,893,639 $ 125,259 $ 2,848,770 285,566 138,460 5,000 429,026 Notes: (1) The variance in Measure "A" revenue is due to higher than anticipated per capita ~rowth in T as well as strong retail sales activity county-wide. _ _ emecula, (2) The variance in operating transfers out is due to the timing of when Measure "A" funded proiects are star~ed and costs are incurred. ~ Percent of Budget 99% (1) 107% 75% 76% 0% (2) 14% City of Temecula Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual Capital Improvement Projects Fund For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2001 Annual Amended YTD Revenues: ( 1 ) Budget Activit~ Operating transfers in $ 16,750,070 $ 6,163,469 Grants Reimbursements 1,384,970 304,062 Investment interest 3,927350 192,491 Article 3 (SB 821) 175,000 90,741 Total Revenues Expenditures: ( 1 ) Rancho Ca Rd interchange Murdeta creek bridge/Overland ext Pala Rd Interim improvements Overland overcrossing Offremp widening at Rancho Ca Rd Panba Rd Improvements 1I Intersection monitoring system Winchester Rd widening Median reimbursement Rainbow Canyon interchange Rancho Ca Rd wide/Ynez Rd Emergency generator Santa Grtrds creek bridge/I-I 5 Santiage/Ynez Int improvements Ynez Rd Interim improvements LED-Light emitting diodes Traffic signals Butterfield/Rancho Ca Pala Rd. bridge Diaz realignment Signal interconnect syst~n Pavement management Jefferson pavement improvement I15/79S interchange (ultimate) Pala Road Improvements Flashing beacons 2000 Flashing signals schools Mall Improvement Overland ext. Diaz road extension at Date street I15/Winchester Road ramp improvements Traffic signals Pala/Loma Linda Traffic signals Pala/Wolf Valley Date streetJCher~y Overpass I15/Santiago interchange Margarita improvements Pio Pico/79S Murrieta creek interim./Via Montezuma Traffic signal controller upgrade Mmrieta creek bridge widening R.C. Traffic signal equipment installation Traffic signals Margarita/DePortola Traffic signals Margarita/Stonewood (continued) - 22,237,490 - 6,750.763 29,051 29,051 210,000 29,641 $ 1,500,000 2,603 232,748 51,289 2,700 175,000 134,266 936,999 46,109 25,000 9,090 25,000 14,388 145,000 220,000 19~46 25,000 578,522 6~76 25,000 2,355 5~500 315,870 115,276 2,058 2,868,277 848,727 56,640 14,293 21,436 2,041,844 831,983 715,000 21,649 325,408 8,857 527,914 205,635 31,000 450 33,700 264 1,670,000 1,882 160,629 117,300 111,994 250,000 10,010 11,999 3,303 1,713,432 52,415 600,737 65313 39,000 25,570 500,000 81.215 210,000 118,519 ~418 5,306 4,906 Total Percent Encumbr. Acfivit~ of Budget $ 6,163369 304,062 192391 90,741 6,750,763 29,051 63,188 92,829 4,796 7,399 95,578 146,867 2,700 2,700 34,791 169,057 43,679 89,788 9,090 14,388 6,140 25,386 6,276 2,355 91,300 93,358 444,546 1,293,273 42,347 56,640 21,436 21336 11,391 843,374 336 21,985 23,323 32,180 265,391 471,026 3,500 3,764 1,882 160,629 160,629 4,500 14,510 8,696 11,999 1,416,498 1368,913 480379 545,892 2,179 2~749 296,177 37~392 2,252 9,670 400 5,306 37% 22% 5% 30% 100% 44% 0% 63% 100% 97% 10% 36% 58% 12% 1% 9% 81% 45% 100% 100% 41% 3% 10% 89% 11% O% 100% 6% 100% 86% 91% 71% 75% 8% 100% City of Temecula Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual Capital Improvement Projects Fund For the Nine Months Ended March 31,200l Woodside landscaping Fiber optic conduits Date/Cherry Street S.B. offramp I- 15 unmmp widening @ Winchester Margarita/Winchester intersection imp. Pujol st. sidewalk improvements Old Town south parking lot Starlight Ridge sidewalk Murrieta Creek multi-purpose trail ADA sports park Multi-trails system Maintenance facility modification Maintenance facility parking lot Senior center expansion Children's museum Civic center Community theater Calle Aragon park drainage Chaparral HS swimming pool Desiltafion pond Margarita community park fencing Northwest sports complex Sports park field lighting Sports park parking lot rehabilitation Trails master plan Chaparral HS Stadimn track Sports park culvert design Museum City hall improvements Library Total Expenditures (Excluding Transfem) Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 2000 Ending Fund Balance, September 30, 2000 Annual Amended YID Budget Activity Total Percent Encumbr. Activity of Budget 78,292 78,292 120,000 118,800 250,000 41,466 670,000 2,213 960 200,000 13,999 472 13,091 13,091 435,432 258,191 154,232 175,000 11,895 200,000 111,453 102,301 9,108 94,608 14 94,595 742,000 12,923 6,122 135,000 616,224 38,653 12,590 51,243 1,662,992 852,761 10,895 863,656 75,000 2,108,850 67,012 49,113 116,125 90,422 90,755 90,755 2,484,433 205,716 88,682 294,398 155,247 140,370 14,419 154,789 5,778 6,106 6,106 4,904,716 4,816 92,746 97,562 582,394 514,143 68,251 582,394 216,365 201,151 1,630 202,781 80,221 53,911 22,846 76,757 44,700 85,000 11.813 324 12,137 7,516 3,500 4,016 7,516 791 791 791 696,376 369,224 191,133 560,357 78,292 118,800 41,466 3,173 14,471 13,091 412,423 11,895 111,409 94,609 19,045 33,791,152 5,532,845 (11,553,662) 1,217,918 11,226,580 11~26,580 4,559,360 10,092,205 (327,082) $ 12,444,498 (1) The vahances in C1P Fund revenues and in project expenditures are due to the timing of when the various projects are actually started and costs are incurred. (2) Project administration costs exceeded budget by $328.00. 100% 99% 17% 0% 7% 100% 95% 7% 100% 10o% 3% 8% 52% 6% 100% 12% 100% 106% (2) 2% 100% 94% 96% 14% 100% 100% 8O% 30% City of Temecula Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual Margarita Road Reimbursement District For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2001 Total Revenues Total Expenditures Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 2000 Ending Fund Balance, March 31, 2001 Annual Amended YTD Total Percent Budget Activity Encumbr. Activity of Budget $ 15,572 15,572 (15,572) (15,572) (15,572) $ Internal Service Funds Combining Balance Sheet As of March 31, 2001 Assets: Cash and investments Receivables Prepaid assets ProperS, plant and equipment (net of accumulated depreciation) Total assets Liabilities and fund equity: Liabilities: Current liabilities Capital leases payable Total liabilities Fund equity: Contributed capital Retained earnings Total fund equity Total liabilities and fund equity Information Support Insm'ance Vehicles Systems Services Facilities Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Total $ 1,200,780 $ 33,631 $ 527,629 $ 186,944 $ 102,204 $ 2,051,188 17,256 690 5,488 2,343 974 26,751 152,433 4,320 156,753 502,694 556,115 146,419 1,205,228 $ 1,370,469 $ 541,33~5 $ 1,089,232 $ 335,706 $ 103,178 $ 3,439,920 449,767 $ 538 $ 61,489 $ 36,454 $ 30,882 $ 579,130 151,565 151,565 449,767 538 61,489 I88,019 30,882 730,695 500,000 214,539 473,065 94,177 1,281,781 420,702 326,258 554,678 53,510 72,296 1,427,444 920,702 540,797 1,027,743 147,687 - 72,296 2,709,225 1,370,469 $ 541,33~5 $~ 1,089,232 $ 335,706 $ I03,17~8 $ 3,439,920 Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Retained Earnings Internal Service Funds For the Nine Months Ended March 31,2001 Charges for services $ Investment interest Miscellaneous Operating transfer in Total Revenues Expenses: Salaries & wages Operating expenses Interest Depreciation Total Expenses Net Income (Loss) Retained Earnings, July 1, 2000 Retained Earnings, March 3l, 2001 $ Information Support Insurance Vehicles Systems Services Facilities Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Total 163,868 $ 124,248 $ 805,989 $ 146,644 $ 262,041 $ 1,502,790 59,071 3,760 17,181 7,967 3,050 91,029 534 5,700 359 6,593 55,000 55,000 223,473 188,708 823,529 154,611 265,091 1,655,412 22,171 205,324 56,424 143~98 427,217 197,568 3,889 292,756 69,140 123,975 687,328 14,534 14,534 102,984 282,405 34,705 420,094 219,739 106,873 780,485 3,734 81,835 43,044 416,968 244,423 511,634 420,702 $ 326,25~85 554,678 $ 174,803 267~73 1,549,173 (20,192) (2,182) 106,239 73,702 74,478 1,321,205 53,510 $ 72,296 $ 1,427,444 Commtudty Facilities Districts Combining Balance Sheet As of March 31, 2001 Assets: Cash and investments Receivables Total assets Liabilities and fund balances: Liabilities: Current liabilities Total liabilities Fund balances: Reserved Designated Total fund balances Total liabilities and fund balances CFD 88-12 CFD 88-12 CFD 984)1 CFD 98-01 Admin Debt Debt Admin Expense Service Service Expense Fund Fund Fund Fund Total 53,813 $ 2,787,476 $ 1,106,871 7,345 34,727 21,843 61,158 $ 2,822,203 $ 1,128,714 14,505 $ 3,962,665 $ 178 64,1)93 $ 14,683 $ 4,026,75~ 8,204 $ 2,822,203 $ 1,128,714 $ 14,683 $ 3,973,804 8,204 2,822,203 1,128,714 14,683 3,973,804 52,954 52,954 61,158 $ 2,822,203 $ 1,128.714 52,954 52,954 $ 14,683 $ 4,026,758 Please note that these balances are unaudited. City of Temecula Statement of Revenuns, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance Community Facilities Districts For the Three Months Ended March 31,2001 Investment interest Reimbursements Special assessments Total Revenues Expenditures: Legal services Other outside services Debt service - principal Debt service - interest Total Expenditures Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 2000 Ending Fund Balance, March 31, 2001 CID 88-12 CFD 88-12 CFD 98-1 CFD 98-1 Admin Debt Debt Admin Expense Service Service Expense Fund Fund Fund Fund Total 1,736 $ 135,605 $ 55,250 $ 183 $ 192,774 12,606 12,606 45,000 833,153 428,147 18,400 1,324,700 59,342 968,758 483,397 18,583 1,530,080 6,438 37,280 43,718 15,624 $ 37,330 6,438 12,700 49,980 610,000 165,000 775,000 904,663 758,723, 1,663,386 1,514,663 923,723 12,700 2,494,804 (545,905) $~(440,326 $ ~5,88~35 (964,724) $ 52,954 17 ITEM 5 APPROVAL CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Manager/City Council Genie Roberts, Director of Finance July 24, 2001 Purchase Of City Vehicle Prepared by: Gus Papagolos, Fiscal Services Manager RECOMMENDATION:That the City Council approve the purchase of the Dodge Durango model year 2001 from Norm Reeves Chrysler/Jeep/Dodge in the amount of $29,576.63. DISCUSSION: On July 3, 2001, City staff met with the local dealerships to announce the Request for Proposal (RFP) for the purchase of a Sport Utility Vehicle (SUV). Five (5) local dealerships provided a bid response to the RFP. The specification called for a bid to be placed on a vehicle currently on the lot and/or in shipment to the dealership therefore, eliminating a 60 to 90 day delay for delivery. On July 11, 2001, vehicles meeting the specification from the local dealerships were test driven by the City Manager. As anticipated, a wide variety of questions were discussed and a visual inspection of each vehicle passenger cabin was completed. The Dodge Durango is the lowest bid vehicle and based on all considered factors it is believed that the Durango would best satisfy the vehicle requirements. Based on previously purchased vehicles the below bids are considered competitive. The following are the bid results: Oeale__r Norm Reeves Dodge Rancho Ford Paradise Chevrolet Carriage Motors Toyota ~od..,l_ Durango 4D 4WD SUV 2001 Expedition 4D 4WD SUV 2001 Tahoe 4D 4WD SUV 2001 Yukon 4D 4WD SUV 2001 Sequoia 4D 4WD SUV 2001 Pri~ $29,576.63 832,196.25 $32,625.00 $33,750.38 $36,773.60 As you know the purchase of the SUV is instrumental in the establishment and deployment of the Community Action Patrol (CAP) program, because, the current vehicle used by the City Manger has been programmed for use by the CAP volunteers. It is also important to understand that this vehicle will be designated and used by the City Manager during any deployment of the Emergency Operation Center (EOC). FISCAL IMPACT: purchase. Adequate funds are available in the Vehicle Internal Service Fund for this Attachment: Vehicle Vendor List Vehicle Vendor List Paradise Chevrolet 26845 Ynez Road Temecula, CA 92591 Rancho Fo~ 26895 Ynez Rd Temecula, CA 92591 Temecula Valley Toyota 26631 Ynez Road Temecula, CA 92591 Norm Reeves Super Group 26755 Ynez Road Temecula, CA 92591 Carriage Motor Company 41872 Motor Car Parkway Temecula, CA 92591 Nissan of Temecula 41895 Motor Car Parkway Temecula, CA 92591 ITEM 6 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY r DIRECTOR OF FINAN.~.~ CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Herman Parker, Director of Community Services ~ July 24, 2001 Arts Council of Temecula Valley Concerts on the Green and Arts in the Country Festival Grant Agreement PREPARED BY: Phyllis L. Ruse, Deputy Director of Community Services RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve a Special Event Community Grant Agreement between the City of Temecula and the Arts Council of Temecula Valley'in the amount of $34,000. DISCUSSION: The Arts Council of Temecula Valley (Arts Council) has been sponsoring a Fall Concert on the Green and an annual Arts in the Country Festival for several years. The City has participated with the Arts Council in funding these two events in the amount of $22,000 in years past. Last year, the City Council provided an additional $12,000 in funding to enable the Arts Council to also present a Spring Concert on the Green. The additional funds were used to pay for the orchestra, advertising and promotion, printing, stage and lighting. The event was held on Mother's Day and was very successful. The Arts Council would again like to offer all three events to the community and is requesting that the City participate in this effort by providing a special event grant in an amount of $34,000. FISCAL IMPACT: The cost to co-sponsor the Spring and Fall Concerts on the Green and Arts in the Country Festival is $34,000. These funds are available in the Community Support Budget of the General Fund in account 001-101-999-5286. R:\RUSEPLAG~NDAS\2001-02 Arts Council Event G-ant Agreemer~t-CC.doc SPECIAL EVENT COMMUNITY GRANT AGREEMENT BETVVEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND THE ARTS COUNCIL OF TEMECULA VALLEY THIS AGREEMENT is made by and between the City of Temecula ("City"), a municipal corporation, and the Arts Council of Temecula Valley, a non-profit corporation, and is dated as of July 24, 2001. In consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. This Agreement is made with respect to the following facts and purposes, which each of the parties hereto acknowledge and agree to be true and correct: a. The Arts Council of Temecula Valley ("Arts Council") coordinates many programs for the cultural arts within the City of Temecula, which are not provided by the City's recreation and cultural arts program. b. The Arts Council warrants and represents to the City that it is a non-profit, tax exempt corporation under the tax laws of the United State and California, and agrees to continue in such status during the term of this Agreement. b. The City Council desires to award a special event community grant to the Arts Council in the amount of thirty-four thousand dollars ($34,000.00) for the purpose of continuing and enhancing its cultural arts programs within the City of Temecula. The City Council hereby allocates $12,000 to co-sponsor the costs of providing the Spring Concert on the Green, $12,000 for the Fall Concert on the Green, and $10,000 for the Arts in the Country Festival special events ("Events") to be presented by the Arts Council during fiscal year 2001-2002. c. This Agreement provides for the manner in which the grant will be paid to the Arts Council. 2. The City shall pay $34,000 to the Arts Council to promote and present the Events for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2002. Arts Council shall submit an invoice to the City prior to each event, which shall represent the City's sponsorship of each event as outlined in Section 1 .b. City shall pay the invoice or provide its written objections to it within thirty (30) working days following receipt by the City. 3. The term of this agreement shall be July 1, 2001 to June 30, 2002. 4. The City may at any time, for any breach of this Agreement, suspend or terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the Arts Council at least ten (10) days prior written notice. If the breach is corrected during this ten-day period, City may, in its sole and exclusive discretion, rescind the termination. If the City suspends or terminates a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement. Arts Council shall make available to the City its books, records and financial documents in such form as to allow City to verify Arts Council's compliance with the terms of this Agreement. R:\RUSEP\CONTRACT~2001-02 Arts Council Community Special Event Grant Agreement.doc 5. The Arts Council agrees to defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless the City, its officers, officials, and employees from and against any and all claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, including attorney fees and expert witness fees, or liability of any kind or nature which the City, its officers, agents and employees may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of Arts Council's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions arising out of or in any way related to the performance or non-performance of this Agreement, excepting only liability attributable to the active negligence of the City. 6. Arts Council shall procure and maintain, or shall have provided on its behalf, for the duration of fiscal year 2001-2002 insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the activities of the Arts Council, its agents, representatives, or employees. a. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as: (1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability form No. CG 00 01 11 85 or 88, including a non-owned auto endorsement. (2) Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Employer's Liability Insurance. Workers Compensation Insurance shall not be required if the Arts Council has no employees. b. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Arts Council shall maintain limits on the policies described in Subsection a. of no less than the following amounts unless otherwise approved by the City Manager: (1) General Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. (2) Workers' Compensation as required by the State; Employer's Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury or disease. c. Deductibles and Self-ln.~ured Retentions Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City Manager. d. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability policies shall contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions: (1) The City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Arts Council; premises owned, occupied or used by the Arts Council; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Arts Council. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers. (2) For any claims related to this Agreement, the Arts Council's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insured maintained by R:\RUSEP\CONTRACT\2001-02 Arts Council Community Special Event Grant Agreement.doc the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be excess of the Arts Council's insurance and shall not contribute with it. (3) Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers. (4) The Arts Council's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. (5) Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, cancelled by either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days' prior written notice to the City by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the City. e. " . Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VlI, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. Self insurance shall not be considered to comply with these insurance requirements. f. Verification of Covera?. Arts Council shall furnish the City with original endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be on forms provided by the City. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. As an alternative to the City's forms, the Arts Council's insurer may provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements effecting the coverage required by these specifications. 7. Arts Council is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Arts Council shall at all times be under Arts Council's exclusive direction and control. Neither City nor any of its officers, employees or agents shall have control over the conduct of Ads Council or any of Arts Council's officers, employees or agents, except as set forth in this Agreement. Arts Council shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. Arts Council shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any manner. 8. Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (i) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice. Notice shall be effective upon delivery to the addresses specified below or on the third business day following deposit with the document delivery service or United States Mail as provided above. R:\RUSEP\CONTRACT~2001-02 Arts Council Community Special Event Grant Agreement.doc To City: To Arts Council: City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, California 92589-9033 Attention: City Manager Arts Council of Temecula Valley P.O. Box 2337 Temecula, California 92593 Attention: Martha Minkler Executive Director 9. The Ads Council shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of the City. 10. This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. R:\RUSEP\CONTRACT~.001-02 Arts Council Community Special Event Grant Agreement.doc IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF TEMECULA Jeff Comerchero Mayor Attest: Susan Jones, CMC City Clerk Approved As to Form: Peter M. Thorson City Attorney ARTS COUNCIL OF TEMECULA VALLEY, a California non-profit corporation By: Name: Title: By: Name: Title: R:\RUSEP\CONTRACT~2001-02 Arts Council Community Special Event Grant Agreement.doc OF THE TEMECULA VALLEY POST OFFICE BOX 2337 ~ TEMECULA, CA 92593 ~ 909.695.2787 ~ FAX 909.695.9438 ~ email: temarts~pe.net BOARD OF TRUSTEES duly 10, 2001 Albert and Grace Ball Maryann and Tom Edwards Sally Haserot Barbara Keen Jon and Jane Laskin Teresa Lubrani Palricia Lusin Joan Lynn Dorothy Meyler Mark Mush Steve Phelps Bruce Singer Paula Stankovich Janet Toscbes Mr. Herman Parker, Director Community Services Department City of Temecula -Post Office Box 9033 Temecula, California 92589-9033 RE: RELEASE OF FUNDS FOR CONCERTS ON THE GREEN AND THIRTEENTH ANNUAL ARTS IN THE COUNTRY FESTIVAL Dear Herman, Thank you very much for including the Arts Council of Temecula Valley's spring and fall Concerts on the Green and the annual Arts in the Country Festival sponsorships in your budget. We are proud to produce these quality events and grateful for the City of Temecula's commitment to sponsoring them. Dr. Alan Winkelstein CONSULTANTS Funding for the spring and fall Concerts on the Green is $12,000 per concert or $24,000. Funding for the Arts in the Country Festival is $10,000. Total funding support is $34,000.00. Fred Lamb If yOU need additional information please feel Jim Meyltr 909.695.2787 or Email to: temarts(~,pe.net. Angels Morris Stewart M. Morris, Jr. Thank you, as always, for your help and support. Karen Parrott Sincerely, ) Martha IN. Minider Executive Director for The Board of Trustees free to call me at The Arts Council's Federal tax ID number is 33-0364524 The Arts Council is a 501 (c)(3) nonprofit California corporation. ITEM 7 CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OFTEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council James O'Grady, Assistant City Manager July 24, 2001 FY2001-02 Economic Development Operating Agreements Prepared by: Gloria Wolnick, Marketing Coordinator RECOMMENDATION: 1. That the City Council approve the operating/marketing agreements with the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce, Economic Development Corporation of Southwest Riverside County, Temecula Valley Film Council, Inland Empire Economic Partnership and Southwest Riverside County Economic Alliance. 2. That the City Council authorize the Mayor to execute the operating/marketing agreements for each of the organizations. BACKGROUND: On February 21, 1995, the City Council adopted the City's Economic Development Strategic Plan. The General Plan's Economic Development Element includes the Marketing Plan and the participation/support of the various partners in economic development. The participation of the City's marketing partners and their roles in the plan is stated in this report. The City of Temecula's FY 2001-02 Operating Budget was approved by the City Council on Tuesday, June 12, 2001. The Economic Development Sub-committee, consisting of Mayor Jeff Comerchero and Mayor Pro Tern Ron Roberts, and Staff met with the City's marketing partners to discuss their funding and operations on Monday, April 9th. At that time representatives from each of the organizations made presentations and provided additional information to the Sub-committee members. Each organization has provided a summary of materials including their work plan, financials and services that they provide (see attachment A). Attached is also an operating agreement for each organization for the FY2001-02 term. Costs of each of their programs will be allocated as follows: Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce Economic Development Corporation of Southwest Riverside County Temecula Valley Film Council Inland Empire Economic Partnership Southwest Riverside County Economic Alliance Total $148,000 $ 20,00O $ 27,000 $ 19,000 $ 75,000 $289,000 R:\Wolnickg~Agendareports~Fina12001-02 funding requests.doc The Economic Development Sub-committee supports these requests. Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce The Chamber primarily supports the area's small business community, as well as provides walk-in visitor and tourist information. In addition, the Chamber responds to requests for tourism, relocation and business inquiries and sends corresponding information to prospective visitors, residents and potential businesses. The Chamber encourages existing businesses and residents to "Shop Temecula First" and provides avenues for businesses to promote their products and services. The Chamber serves as a representative for business legislative issues that affect the overall welfare of the Chamber Membership. In cooperation with the school district, the Chamber plans, coordinates and assists in programs that foster and encourage a viable working partnership among business, educators and students. The Chamber received $140,000 for FY 2000-01. The Chamber's request in the amount of $148,000 was budgeted in the FY 2001-02 Operating Budget. The increase in Chamber funding was based on the new business and tourism activity in Temecula, as well as the increase in population with the Vail Ranch annexation. Economic Development Corporation of Southwest Riverside County The EDCSWRC's main focus for the organization will be to expand on its successful business retention and expansion program for the sub-region including the Temecula, Murdeta, and Lake Elsinore communities. The partnership with the Southwest Riverside County Manufacturers' Council has furthered the efforts of the business retention and expansion program by developing relationships within the manufacturing community and providing forums for information gathering and sharing. The affiliation with the Manufacturer's Council has provided inroads for the EDCSWRC to work with our universities and community colleges on vocational training. In addition, the EDCSWRC works closely with City Staff and the County of Riverside to increase its business retention efforts as well. The EDCSWRC serves as an information source via its website providing such information as statistical data on the labor force, data on the area's industrial and manufacturing business base and outreach programs undertaken by the organization. The EDCSWRC hosts the Loopnet link to its website, which provides commercial property listings of available sites for lease or sale in Southwest Riverside County. The EDCSWRC received $20,000 for FY 2000-01. The EDCSWRC's request of $20,000 was budgeted in the FY 2001-02 Operating Budget. This will provide funding for the operations of the organization including business retention/development programs, a newsletter, and quarterly informational luncheon meetings. Temecula Valley Film Council "The purpose of the Temecula Valley Film Council is to attract and facilitate location production in the Temecula Valley by acting as a liaison between the film industry and the community. By actively seeking filming, video production, and still photography, direct economic benefit will be generated to the area through location fees and the purchase of goods, services and labor. Residual tourism benefits will adse from the area exposure in film, television and print." R:\Wolnickg~Agendareports~Final 2001-02 funding requests,doc The Temecula Valley Film Council (-I-VFC), has been in existence for nine years, and works in cooperation with the Inland Empire Film Commission (IEFC). Both organizations coordinate and follow-up on requests for locations in the Temecula area. All location scouting and filming in the Temecula area is reported monthly to the IEFC and is included in their report to the State Film Commission. The Film Council received $29,000 for FY 2000-01. The Film Council's request of $27,000 ($2,000 less than last year's funding request) was budgeted in the FY 2001-02 Operating Budget. This will provide funding for the operations of the organization, attendance at two trade shows, website maintenance, and development of an updated Production Guide. Inland Empire Economic Partnership "The Inland Empire Economic Partnership (IEEP) mission is to attract, create and retain business in order to increase the region's growth and economic output. This is achieved by providing superior services to members, clients and the communities in the Inland Empire. It is supported by IEEP's core values of regional teamwork, marketing focus, financial strength, integrity and professional excellence." Staff continues to work with the IEEP on a regional marketing effort. IEEP is the regional economic development organization covedng Riverside-San Bemardino Counties. IEEP programs include regional marketing, business development (recruitment and retention), Small Business Development, Film, Toudsm, High Technology Programs & Services, Workforce Development and Govemmental Affairs. The IEEP has provided more focus on the Temecula Valley area in their marketing efforts (i.e. media coverage, advertising, and hosting meetings). An IEEP satellite office is located in Temecula. It is not staffed full time, but the Inland Empire Film Commission is staffed there twice a week and the office is available for local meetings related to economic development. Also, the IEEP continues its focus on the high-tech industry and is expanding its high-tech program to include the High Tech Initiative. This initiative will allow IEEP staff to improve the awareness of technology-related programs and initiatives in the Inland Empire. The IEEP received $12,701 for FY 2000-01. The IEEP's request of $19,000 ($16,146 membership dues and $2,854 for the High Tech Initiative Program) was budgeted in the FY 2000-01 Operating Budget. This will provide funding for programs and services to attract, retain, and expand local business through seven different operating divisions benefiting Temecula. Southwest Riverside County Economic Alliance Agreement Since 1999, the cities of Temecula, Murrieta, Lake Elsinore and Riverside County have continued its pprtnership in marketing Southwest Riverside County through the Southwest Riverside County Economic Alliance. The Alliance provides marketing services to the member c. ities and unincorporated county area in an effort to enhance the image of this region and stimulate private investment and job creation to this economy. This business attraction partnership allows Temecula to leverage its funds with other agencies for this regional effort. Attached is an agreement that provides for a one-year extensiqppf this program. Under this concept, the marketing program will consist of advertising, business R:\Wolnickg~Agendareports~Fina12001-02 funding requests.doc .'~ attraction/retention, and trade shows. Other services also provided by Riverside County under this agreement would include: · One (1) County staff representative · Facility for representative · Equipment · Transportation · Supervision · Expertise in the marketing field Costs of this program will be allocated as follows: Riverside County City of Temecula City of Murrieta City of Lake Elsinore Total $135,000 (estimated value of staff, space and expenses) $ 75,000 $ 50,000 $ 25,000 ($10,000 in cash, balance in-kind services not to exceed $25,000) FISCAL IMPACT: Appropriate funding for the organizations is available in the FY 2001-02 Economic Development Department Operating Budget #001-111-999-5264. ATTACH M E N TS: lA Temecula Valley Chamber of Information 1B City/Chamber Operating Agreement Commerce Support 2A 2B Economic Development Corporation of Southwest Riverside County Support Information City/Economic Development Corporation of Southwest Riverside County Operating Agreement 3A 3B Temecula Valley Film Council Support Information City/Film Council Operating Agreement 4A Inland Empire Economic Partnership Support Information 4B City/Inland Empire Economic Partnership Marketing Agreement 5A 5B Southwest Riverside County Economic Alliance Support Information1 City/Southwest' Riverside County Economic Alliance Marketing Agreement R:\Wolnickg~Agendareports~Final 2001-02 funding requests.doc lA TEMECULA VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE SUPPORT INFORMATION Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce Goals & Objectives 2001-2002 To encourage the growth of existing member industries and businesses. To assist any new legitimate firms or individuals seeking to locate in the Temecula Valley area. To serve as a responsible representative for all business legislation and activity that affects the overall welfare of our members. To promote, support, and assist the tourism industry in the Temecula Valley. To serve as an informational resource center for members and the community at large. Tourism · To continue providing professional services in response to tourism inquiries on behalf of the City of Temecula. · To continue to advertise the Chamber's phone number in the outreach tourism publications. · To publish an updated Visitors Guide. · To attend Trade Shows representing the City of Temecula. · To organize and host Fam Tours for the City of Temecula. · To assist City staff in organizing tourism presentations. Community Information · To continue to provide walk-in/telephone inquiries with the best possible service. · To continue to provide updated maps, demographics, relocation packets, housing and rental lists, calendar of events, organizations lists, senior packets, etc. · To provide updated information on the Chamber's website. City 'Promotions · To continue to promote the benefits of keeping tax dollars local through the semi-annual Shop Temecula First Campaign. · To continue to educate the business community by hosting events such as the Technology Expo, Business of the Month, Business Showcase, State of the City, Mystery Shopper Campaign, Marketing Seminars, Roundtables, etc. · To continue providing the City with two pages of space each month in the Chamber newsletter. The City has published articles such as Temecula City Council for 2000, Excellent Police Business Programs, Temecula in Review, Future Temecula Library and Partnership Strengthens City Marketing Efforts. · To further develop the new marketing program "Just Ask Us" for the community to contact the Chamber for all resources, such as plumbers, tailors, attorneys, etc. Education/Government · To continue to work in partnership with the City of Temecula and the Temecula Valley Unified School District. · To commence a Youth Job Fair to benefit the students of Temecula and the business community. · The Government Action Committee will continue to take a more active role in the City of Temecula and state legislative issues. · To provide our business members and community with educational information to help them prosper. Economic Development Marketing Campaign · To continue to serve on the City's Marketing Committee. · To provide information to each business interested in relocating to Temecula. · To continue to provide the City with letters of endorsement for grants and future proposals. · As part of the Welcoming Committee, continue to provide ribbon cuttings. City Contract Services Provided by The Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce Projected Budget for July 2001-June 2002 Based on Temecula's Population Increase at 10% Services Provided Cost Tourism Walk-in/Telephone Traffic $30,567 Visitors Guides $1,760 Postage/Printing Materials $550 Internet-Tourism info $1,925 Weekend Visitors Center $3,300 Long Lead Event Calendar $711 Temecula-So. California Brochure $660 Trade Show Participation $550 Fam Tour Participation $550 Marketing Committee Participation $330 Temecula Talks in Chamber Newsletter $2,376 Tourism CD Rom $1,650 Email Response $743 Community Information Walk-in/Telephone Traffic $4,995 City Maps $1,320 Demographic Information $1,100 Relocation Packets $9,240 Housing/Apartment Listings $935 Special Events $2,365 Climate Listing $55 Calendar of Events $1,289 Internet-Relocation/Calendar/Schools/Organizations $2,646 Email Response $731 City Promotions 'Shop Temecula First Campaign (2) $1,100 Business of the Month Program $2,530 Internet-Local Business $1,540 Business Showcase $7,700 Technology Expo $11,253 Mystery Shopper Campaign $5,940 State of the City $17,600 Holiday Lights/4th of July Floats $2,420 Monthly Newsletter Articles (City) $8,580 Installation Dinner $1,100 Balloon & Wine Festival City/Chamber Booth $165 Education/Government Youth Job Fair $770 Issue Awareness $5,940 Candidate Forum $4,400 Good Morning Sacramento Forum $4,40(~ Good Morning Washington Forum $4,400 Economic Development Marketing Campaign Welcoming Committee (Ribbon Cuffings) $2,904 Business Inquiries $1,65C Provide support to existing Temecula business/Retention $1,430 Total for Services $156,170 (:3 0 0 8888888°°°°'8oooo 0 ooOO§§~ooooo~ooooo oo888888°°8oo 8 oooo~8~8°°°ooo 0 88' Z g ~ [, 8 o~ Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce Balance Sheet February 28, 2001 Current Assets Checking - FNB 2172715 Scholarship Fund Money Market - FNB 2541281 Cap Impv Fnd - FNB 2545120 CO Pacific Trust CBT Business Moneyplus Pe[ty Cash Total Current Assets Property and Equipment Office Furniture & Equipment Construction in Progress Accum Depr- Off Fum & Equip Total Property and Equipment Other Assets Total Other Assets Total Assets ASSETS 16,497.09 12.02 564.94 8,555.49 80,449.10 3,720.44 200.00 109,513.73 199,090.89 <52,761.00> 109,999.08 255,843.62 0.00 $ 365,842.70 ;urrent Liabilities FUTA Tax Payable CA State Payroll Taxes Payable CA SUI Payable Health Ins - Employee W/H Retirement - Employee W/H Tota'l Current Liabilities Long-Term Liabilities Total Long-Term Liabilities Total Liabilities NET ASSETS Beginning Balance Net Income Total Net Assets Total Liabilities & Net Assets LIABILI~I'IES AND NET ASSETS 317.84 <174.48> 0.02 440.00 1,076.50 1,659.88 0.00 1,659.88 319,214.35 44,968.47 364,182.82 365,842.70 .cc o~o~oooooooooooooooooooooooo o ~o ~ o ooooo ~ooo~o o o ~ TOURISM The Chamber provides each caller, walk-in visitor or e-mail request with tourism information on local wineries, golf courses, Old Town, hotels, motels, and any other pertinent information. Since July 2000, 42,420 tourism inquiries were serviced by the Chamber through phone calls, mailings, walk-ins, Visitor Center walk-ins, and e-mail. Fam Tours for travel writers, tour operators, and hotel concierge personnel are organized by City and Chamber staffheld throughout the year to showcase Temecula's tourism sites. This year, the Mayor, City and Chamber staff met with the Director of Tourism for the State of California and representatives from the Office of Tourism from Japan, Australia, and Germany. The California Travel Market and Los Angeles Times Travel Show and various Trade Shows held throughout the year are staffed by City, Chamber, and Tourism Council members. Chamber staff works closely with the Inland Empire Tourism Council. Visitors Guides will also be published this year and will continue to be distributed and sent to visitors per their request. We have many bulk mailing and pick-up requests. The Tourism CD Rom Project developed by the City's Marketing Department will be reviewed by the Tourism Council and interlinked to the Chamber's website. Chamber staff assists with a follow-up survey to the businesses and visitors who attend the special events in Temecula. The Chamber's phone number is listed in the following publications for visitor information. · AAA Publications · Business Resource Guide · California 2000 (Visitor Guide) · City of Temecula User Guide · North County CONVIS Visitor Guide · San Diego Guest Informant · Inland Empire Regional Visitors Guide · San Diego CONVIS Visitors Pocket Guide · San Diegan · Tourism Newsletter · Welcome Guide to New Residents · Tourism articles that are submitted to the press, travel writers, etc. The mission of the Tourism Council is to work to develop and promote a healthy tourist industry in the Temecula Valley. The committee continues to seek out a broad diversity of interest from all tourism segments and has seen an increase in attendance of representation from the local wineries, Film Council, Old Town, hotels, etc. COMMUNITY INFORMATION Chamber Website - The website provides information on relocation, TVCC members (over 1,200 members), organizations, meeting facilities, tourism, recreation, and Shop Temecula First information. It is now linked with the City of Temecula, Temecula Valley Wine Growers Association, and the Weather Channel websites. Calendar of Events - The Calendar is currently updated on a weekly basis through the website, changes made in-house by Chamber staff. Calendars are distributed to visitors. An Organizations listing and the Calendar are enclosed in your packet. School Schedules and Statistical Reports - The Temecula Valley Unified School District provides the Chamber with the current schedules. Brochures are available for current residents and individuals seeking to relocate to Temecula. Maps - The Chamber has published 17,000 updated maps with over 300 additional new street names. Demographic packets - 2,585 packets have been distributed this past year. Relocation Packets - The relocation packet consists of the following information: local schools, utilities, city and government offices, law enforcement, hospitals, climate, history, and a community profile. The Chamber has serviced 8,380 relocation inquiries since July 2000 received through phone calls, mailings, walk-ins, Visitor Center walk-ins, and e-mails. New Housing and Rental Information Listings - provides relocation inquiries with information on locations, square footage, number of bedrooms, and price ranges. A staff member goes out into the community on a quarterly basis to update these lists. State of the City - On March 29, 2001, the Chamber hosted the State of the City Luncheon, with 350 guests in attendance. The Chamber will provide the City of Temecula with 20 complimentary tickets for the year 2002 event. Installation Dinner - This year's dinner hosted 530 guests. Next year's event is already in the planning stages and we look forward to another successful event. City Council Members will be provided with premier seating and receive complimentary reservations for themselves and a guest. CITY PROMOTIONS One of the most significant accomplishments the Chamber has experienced this year is the Temecula Today.t monthly newsletter. A newsletter sample is enclosed. There is more information on current legislation affecting the business community and educational information to help businesses succeed. The Chamber provides the City of Temecula with two full-pages of advertisement space in the Temecula Today.t newsletter. The section is headlined "News From The City" and has had feature articles such as, Temecula City Council 2000, Excellent Business Police Programs, Growth Management Strategies, City Budget ...Building on a Tradition of Success, Business Resource Materials are Now Available, and Partnerships Strengthen City Marketing Efforts. Shop Temecula First - Successful 'Shop Temecula First' campaigns are promoted, encouraging the community to 'Shop Temecula First' to keep tax dollars local. These successful campaigns will continue in June and November of this year. The committee is updating the logo and posters and anticipates 200 participants this year, which will contribute to local tax dollars. Marketing Seminars - The focus of the seminars is to educate the business community in marketing their business. Last year's seminar topic was "The Basics of Employment Law for Businesses of All Sizes". The "Just Ask Us" Marketing Program will encourage the community to contact the Chamber for all resources. Need a plumber, contractor, or attorney? "Just Ask Us"! The program will sport a new promotional brochure, as well as placed on the Chamber page in the local newspapers. EDUCATION AND GOVERNMENT The Education Committee will sponsor a Youth Job Fair with the Workforce Development Center's Hire-a-Youth Program and The Promenade in Temecula. The job fair is geared for the Temecula students, ages 16-18, who will be asked to attend workshops taught by teachers from the Regional Occupation Program. Participating employers must have job positions available. The Career Education Video Project is part of the business mentoring program. The committee has worked with the video production class at Chaparral High School, and to date, four businesses have been filmed for individuals seeking employment. The Chamber has taken a more proactive approach in taking positions on issues and educating the business community. The Chamber sent letters to the Governor's office and other agencies concerning the Energy Crisis and SB1637 (Burton) Property Tax Revenue Shifts: Limitation. A letter is now in development regarding redistricting of the Temecula and Murrieta supervisorial areas. The committee organizes Good Morning Sacramento, Good Morning Washington D.C., and will coordinate a City Council Candidates Forum in October 2001. Board members and Chamber staff will visit the State Capitol this month. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MARKETING CAMPAIGN A Chamber executive staff member meets with each business inquirer interested in relocating or forming a new business in Temecula. This individual is introduced to the City and informed on the area. We provide three different types of demographic packets (City of Temecula, Community Economic Profile, and the Community Profile supplied by John E. Husing, Ph.D.), including housing, rentals, maps and business newsletters. The Chamber President/CEO is a member of the SWRCEDC Retention Committee. The Chamber is the small business advocate and works well with the City of Temecula in providing assistance to the business community when issues arise. The business community benefits from the Chamber, City, and other agencies by having a good working relationship. As part of the Welcoming Committee program, the Chamber has provided ribbon cuttings for 137 businesses since July 2000, which are highlighted monthly in the Temecula Today.t newsletter. IB CITY/CHAMBER OPERATING AGREEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND TEMECULA VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE This Agreement, made in triplicate, this 24th day of July, 2001, by and between the CITY OF TEMECULA, a Municipal Corporation, duly organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of California, (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and the TEMECULA VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, a California nonprofit corporation (hereinafter referred to as "CHAMBER") with reference to the following facts which are acknowledged by each party as true and correct: I. RECITALS A. The City is desirous of promoting its advantages as a business, industrial, and residential center; disseminating information relative thereto, and of propedy following up and giving consideration to inquiries made relative to the various activities of City of Temecula ("City") and its possibilities as such to residential, industrial, and business interests. B. The Chamber has special knowledge, experience and facilities for disseminating information; and is organized for and equipped to carry on promotional activities on behalf of City; and to publicize and exploit its advantages. C. Such activities are recognized by law as being in the public interest and serving a public purpose. II. AGREEMENT NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between the parties as follows: A. Chamber shall undertake, during the 2001-2002 fiscal year, to carry on promotional activities on behalf of City and to particularly render the following services: 1. To maintain suitable quarters and employ competent professional personnel to carry on the promotional activities herein stated. 2. To promptly answer all correspondence relative to the business, industrial, and residential advantages and opportunities in the City of Temecula, and to disseminate information by correspondence, newspaper public Agency and personal contacts favorably advertising such advantages and opportunities. 3. Respond to legislative issues through the Chamber's Government Action Committee. Organize a City of Temecula Council Candidates Forum inviting the membership and community. 4. To prepare a long lead event calendar. 5. Assist in trade show and Familiarization Tour participation. 6. Develop and execute marketing seminars. R:\Wolnickg\S ponsored Events\chamber agreement 200 l.doc 1 7. Coordinate the welcoming committee with the EDC. 8. To assist potential businesses in opening and relocating to Temecula. 9. To assist in the development and implementation of a city-wide marketing plan to promote toudsm and business expansion. 10. To promote and invite trade and business meetings and celebrations whereby outside interests and individuals may become acquainted with the advantages and opportunities in Temecula. 11. To support the City in all ways possible in the furtherance of the activities of the City of Temecula. 12. To maintain a public office within the business area of City, easily accessible and fully equipped for the purpose of disseminating information and answering correspondence and inquiries regarding the City. Said office shall be open to the public not less than eight hours a day, except Saturdays, Sundays, and holidays. Chamber shall employ a full time President/CEO, a portion of whose duties shall be to promote the welfare and activities of the City of Temecula; its industries, business activities and opportunities, residential advantages; and other matters of general public interest. 13. Retention Committee for community businesses to sustain and nurture existing businesses in Temecula. 14. Produce and update relocation packets for new residents. 15. Provide demographic information to interested individuals. 16. Organize events to promote goodwill in the City such as the Shop Temecula First Campaign, Technology Expo, Business Showcase, State of the City Luncheon (20 seats), Installation Dinner (20 seats) and parade participation. 17. Maintain and update Chamberweb-site. 18. Update and reprint Visitor Guide, which will include a detailed Old Town Temecula section. 19. Update and repdnt City Maps. B. That in consideration of the services to be performed by Chamber for City, as set forth in paragraph 1 hereof, City hereby agrees to pay Chamber, during the term of this Agreement, the sum of $148,000 for the fiscal year 2001-02, payable upon receipt of invoice quarterly beginning on execution of this Agreement. C. In the event the City of Temecula should desire any additional service, Chamber shall, upon request of City, furnish a proposal including an itemized statement of the estimated cost thereof, and the City of Temecula may modify or alter the proposal in its sole discretion or R:\Wolrfickg\Sponsored Events\chamber agreement 2001 .doc 2 the final approval of any such proposal and execution thereof, by the City of Temecula and the Chamber, as herein provided, the City will pay to Chamber the cost thereof, and the Chamber shall perform the work. All money due for carrying out said plan or proposal shall be supported by a detailed statement of Chamber showing the basis of said claims, and certified by proper officers of Chamber. Chamber shall not be entitled to receive any compensation for its normal services or expenses. D. The PresidentJCEO of the Chamber shall prepare and submit to the City Manager and Assistant City Manager a monthly written report specifying the activities of Chamber. Said report shall be prepared in a format acceptable to the City of Temecula and is requested by the second Friday of each month. E. Chamber agrees that it will defend, indemnify and hold the City and their respective elected officials, officers, agents, and employees free and harmless from all claims for damage to persons or property by reason of Chamber's acts or omissions or those of Chamber's employees, officers, agents or invitees in connection with their services rendered hereunder to the maximum extent allowed by law. F. Chamber shall secure from a good and responsible company or companies doing insurance business in the State of California, pay for and maintain in full force and effect for the duration of this Agreement a policy of comprehensive automobile and workers' compensation and employees' Liability Insurance in which the City of Temecula is the named insured or is named as an additional insured with the Chamber and shall furnish a Certificate of Liability Insurance to the City of Temecula. Notwithstanding any inconsistent statement in the policy or any subsequent endorsement attached thereto, the protection offered by the policy shall; 1. Include the City of Temecula as the insured or named as an additional insured covedng the services to be performed under this Agreement against all claims arising out of, or in connection with, the Agreement. 2. Include the City of Temecula, its officers, employees and agents while acting within the scope of their duties under this Agreement against all claims arising out of, or in connection with, the Agreement. 3. Provide the following minimum limits: General Liability: $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 combined single limit per accident for bodily injury and property damage. Workers' Compensation and Employers Liability: Workers' Compensation limits as required by the Labor Code of the State of California and Employers' Liability limits of $1,000,000 per accident. R:\Wolnickg\Sponsored Events\chamber agreement 2001.doc 3 4. The insurer shall agree to waive all dghts of subrogation against the Agency, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers for losses arising from work performed by the Contractor for the City. 5. Bear an endorsement or shall have attached adder whereby it is provided that, in the event of expiration or proposed cancellation of such policy for any reason whatsoever, the City of Temecula shall be notified by registered mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, not less than thirty (30) days before. 6. Any deductible or self-insured retention must be declared to and approved by the City of Temecula. At the option of the City, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductible or self-insured retention as respects the City, its officers, officials and employees; or the Chamber shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigation claim administration and defense expenses. G. Should any litigation be commenced between the parties hereto conceming the previsions of this Agreement, the prevailing party in such litigation shall be entitled to reasonable attorney's fees, in addition any other relief to which it may be entitled. H. This Agreement shall be effective for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2001, and terminating June 30, 2002. I. This Agreement may be terminated by either party upon thirty (30) days wdtten notice with any sums due and payable hereunder. R:\W olnickg\S ponsored Events\chamber agreement 200 l.doc 4 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above wdtten. CITY OF TEMECULA TEMECULA VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE Jeff Comerchero, Mayor Tomi Arbogast Chairman of the Board ATTEST: Susan Jones, CMC City Clerk Alice Sullivan President/CEO APPROVED AS TO FORM: Ron Bradley Treasurer Peter Thorson, Agency Attorney Bonnie Renz-Hanna Secretary ARenc¥ Information Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce 27450 Ynez Rd., Suite 124 Temecula, CA 92591 (909) 676-5090 R:\Wolnickg\Sponsored Events\chamber ag~eemeat 2001.doc 5 2A ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY SUPPORT INFORMATION OFFICERS C~ ¥~um~ms Coramuni~y Nations( ~k P~t D~vld Ph~res D~ Phis ~sso~t~ Phil Oberhansley~ Esq. Cann~ Par~ ~ Ob~aml~ SO~ Kei~ Johnson Mbs~m Oa~ Nat~nd ~nk DIRECTORS Marlene Best Ciff of Lake Ehinore Ron Bradley Temecula CONNECT Jeff Comerchero Mqyor - Ciy of Tememla Mike Doblado The promenade Mall Dennis Frank Univer~y of Cahfornia, Pdverside Darren Gill DOD Construction Fred Grimes W/estMar Commerdal Bmkerag6 Inc. Ted Hating Eastern Munia~al IVater District Ron H olliday ~y of Munleta Jim King Southern Ca~fornia Gas Company Dick Kurtz CDM Grou. O~ Inc. Michael Lewia I~v Offces of Mirau Edward Cannon HarUr ~ Lt~in Robert Lopez Southern California Edison Rob Moran Rluerdd~ Couny ED.4 Lod Moss James O'Grafly City of Teraeculu Bonnie Renz-Hanua Dimrsifieg The Staffing Solution David Rosenthal $outhvast R~vmi& County Manufact~rtrs' Coundl Al Sabsevitz Lorie Schule~berg Tammy Walsh lwke Eht~or~ Valle7 Chamber of Commerce EDCffi ~ Riversi~C~~un~ March 16, 2001 Jim O'Grady City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 RECEIVED ?:.., RE: FUNDING REQUEST FOR FY 2001-02 Dear Jim: The Economic Development Corporation of Southwest Riverside County (EDCSWRC) is pleased to submit for your review the organization's draft operating budget for FY 2001-02, financial statements ending June 30, 2000, and Summary of Activities FY 2000-01. Our funding request in the amount of twenty thousand dollars ($20,000) is reflected in the draft budget as anticipated revenue from the City of Temecula. We hope to secure the funding in July 2001, which coincides with a planned membership campaign. There are no anticipated changes to the existing contract between the City and EDCSWRC. Scope of services will continue with business relations and development, community outreach, and education programs. Also, ongoing staff education in marketing and fund development will allow greater opportunity to advance the organization's mission. Thank you for considering this request. We look forward to meeting with the Economic Development Subcommittee in April. Respectfully, Diane Sessions Administrator cc: Gary Youmans, EDC President end.: Summary of Activity FY2000-01 Draft Operating Budget FY2001-02 Financial Statements ending June 30, 2000 Post Office Box 1388 · 27447 Enterprise CircleWest, Suite #101 · Temecula, CA 92593-1388 Office 909/6004064 · FAX 909/60045005 ° Email info@edc-swrc.org · www. edc-swrc.org ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY Implementation Plan 2001-2002 Executive Summary The Implementation Plan was put together from information that was developed in a series of discussion groups as well as input from the general membership. Information was solicited from economic development experts and provided during focused discussions. The plan will center on six key areas. The plan is not limited to the following and will have the ability to add or delete items as needed with Board approval. The key areas that will be part of the plan are as follows: 1. Retain and expand businesses in Southwest Riverside County. 2. Create a synergy between the business community, public agencies, education and training facilitators, and economic development organizations in the region. 3. Facilitate a streamlined environment where the public and private entities can work in partnership for the creation and retention of employment in the area. 4. Develop an information source via newsletters, luncheons, and seminar presentations to create a source of public education forums to assist all businesses. 5. Be a focal point of local efforts to promote and enhance a healthy economy. 6. Support a business environment that promotes economic growth and creates a desirable lifestyle in which members of the community and live and work. In order to reach these objectives, the EDC must continue to expand its membership to better fund the efforts outlined above. Membership expansion will also attract additional expertise that the EDC can draw from to meet goals. Currently, membership is centered in the Temecula area; further membership from Murfieta and Lake Elsinore will be needed to meet the regional goals that are a part of this organization. This expansion will include civic and trade organizations that also have the common goal of building a strong economic business community. Southwest Riverside County needs the EDC to be the organization that will take a leadership role, with its primary goal to develop quality jobs in the area. Successful facilitation of this plan will ensure that businesses in the area will expand, new businesses will be attracted to the area, and more jobs will be generated. With new jobs created, the over-50% commuter population within Southwest Riverside County may find work in the area. This will produce the perfect balance between an already desirable place to live and a business climate that will support its residents. EDC SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY OPERATING BUDGET JULY 1, 2001 TO JUNE 30, 2002 Revenue Membership - Cash $ 33,000.00 City Participation $ 30,000.00 County Participation $ 11,200.00 Special Event Revenue (golf) $ 18,800.00 Quarterly Luncheons $ 9,000.00 Interest Income $ 2,000.00 TOTAL REVENUE EXPENDITURES Total Personnel Services Direct Operating Expenses Advertising $ 200.00 Insurance $ 2,450.00 Office Supplies $ 1,500.00 Equipment repairs $ 100.00 Telephone $ 1,800.00 Postage $ 3,000.00 Printing/copying/binding $ 1,000.00 Dues/memberships $ 300.00 Conferenceftreining $ 1,500.00 Travel $ 500.00 Rent $ 11,200.00 Website $ 2,500.00 Taxes & License $ 150.00 Miscellaneous Expenses $ 100.00 Professional Fees $ 200.00 Total Direct Operating Expenses Direct Program Expenses Membership Drive Newsletter Expense Quarterly Luncheons Golf Tournament Total Direct Program Expenses $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 9,000.00 $55,500.00 $26,500.00 $22,000.00 $ I04,000.00 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $104,000.00 EXCESS EXPENDITURES OVER REVENUE $ 0 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COPRPORATION OF SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY SUMMARY OF ACTIVITY July 1, 2000 to June 30, 2001 _Business Dev~ · Responded to 29 leads generated by a variety of sources including the City of Temecula, City of Murrieta, existing businesses, commercial real estate brokers (local and out of area), developers, construction companies (local and out of area), and individuals. · Attended two site tours for companies looking to build a hotel and an arts/entertainment center. Business Retention/Expansion · As of March 1, 2001, the Business Relations Committee attended 8 monthly meetings and completed 29 visitations during FY 2000-0. Survey data was collected in person and by telephone. Year to date, committee members received and responded to 10 miscellaneous action items regarding workforce training, lending, property issues, technology, vendor referrals, and permits. · The EDCSWRC, in partnership with the cities of Lake Elsinore, Murrieta, Temecula, their respective Chambers of Commerce, Riverside County EDA, and SWRC Economic Alliance, helped prepare and distribute the SWRC Business Resource Guide. Riverside County Workforce Development Board funded the project through a business visitation grant. The guide is designed to assist new, expanding or relocating firms find the.resources they need to succeed in SW Riverside County. The guide is available for viewing on the EDCSWRC web site at www.edc-swrc.org. · Completed a website redesign that included a more professional representation of the EDCSWRC, state-of-the-art graphics, more links to various business resource sites, access to the Business Resource Guide, Business Census Survey, and EDC newsletters and updates. Upgrades are in progress to add a restricted page for members only. · EDCSWRC is a partner agency in the Temecula Workforce Development Center (WDC) and actively participates in events and workshops related to employee development. Other WDC partners include Employment Development Department, Riverside County EDA, SWRC Economic Alliance, Department of Rehabilitation, Office on Aging, Mt. San Jacinto College, Volunteer Center of Riverside County, Center for Employment Training, CalWorks/G.AI.N, and Kelly Services. Post Office Box 1388 · 27447 Enterprise Circle West, Suite vlOl· Temecula, CA 92593-1388 Office 909/600-6064 · FAX 909/600-6005 · Email info@edc-swrc.org · www. edc-swrc.org Summary of Activity July 1, 2000 - June 30, 2001 Page 2 of 4 Education/Marketing/Outreach Participated in 9 general meetings of the Southwest Riverside County Manufacturers' Council. Reciprocal board positions exist between the EDCSWRC and the Manufacturers' Council. Staff serves as an honorary board member of the Council. EDCSWRC helped coordinate the Manufacturers' Council's first quarterly luncheon held on February 23, 2001 at the Hemet WDC. Attended three Temecula CONNECT Links luncheons to date. Reciprocal memberships exist between the two organizations. Attended six Lake Elsinore Chamber of Commerce/EDC luncheons to date. Reciprocal memberships exist between the two organizations. Attended two Murrieta Brokers' meetings held at Murrieta Council Chambers. Attended three 3~d District Quarterly Workshops hosted by County Supervisor Jim Venable. Attendees are economic development partners (Chambers of Commerce, EDCs, city staff, etc.) representing Riverside County's third district. EDCSWRC will attend the upcoming quarterly workshop in April 2001. Attended four SWRC Economic Alliance meetings. EDCSWRC strongly supports the Alliance and works in partnership to help advance regional marketing efforts. Hosted four quarterly luncheons that provided topics on workforce development, technology programs offered through UC Riverside, economic forecast for the region, and higher education. The last quarterly luncheon for FY 2000-01 will be on April 26, 2001 and will provide information on corporate/technical recruitment and labor law updates. Partnered in the Business Resource Guide project. The comprehensive guide was designed to assist the business community with access to a collection of available resources. Mass distribution of the guide was completed in July 2001. Created a new marketing brochure used for membership solicitation, lead responses, business visitations and assistance, and general mailings. Redesigned the organization's newsletter. A first edition was printed in early March 2001, with production continuing on a quarterly cycle. Prepared and mailed 194 response letters and resource packets to Temecula business owners who responded to the business census survey. Each packet included information that was specifically requested by survey participants. Currently acts as lead agency for the SWRC Career & Manufacturers' Expo scheduled for April 21, 2001. In its third year, this annual event is hosted by The Press- Enterprise. Staff attended and/or participated in the following meetings/events: 0 Lake Elsinore City Council Meeting - Staff presented the City with the perpetual golf trophy for winning the City Showdown contest as best golfers in the EDC 6th Annual Golf Tournament. Summary of Activity July 1, 2000- June 30, 2001 Page 3 of 4 Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce Mixer Murrieta Home-Based Business Survey presentation Murrieta State-of-the-City Address City of Temecula Marketing Meeting Murrieta Chamber of Commerce Mixer Vista Office Center open house event hosted by Nancy Austin of Coldwell Banker Ground-breaking event for Multi-Visual Products in Murrieta Temecula Mayor's Breakfast Meeting with Bob Dowden of Guidant to discuss employee retention strategies Inland Empire Economic Forecast Breakfast on December 8, 2000 California Bank & Trust holiday party Represented the EDCSWRC at the Murrieta Chamber's Business Showcase in Murrieta Represented the EDCSWRC at the Temecula Chamber's B2B Technology Expo under the hospice of the City of Temecula Organization / Administration As of February 22, 2001, EDCSWRC held eight general board meetings, and four various committee meetings. General board meetings are held monthly on the third Thursday at 9:00 a.m., in the Temecula Workforce Development Center. EDCSWRC is developing partnerships with various San Diego economic development agencies in San Diego. Board of Directors took action on the following: 0 Appointed new Director-at-Large to represent the SWRC Manufacturers' Council Submittal of a grant application for additional website enhancements Resolution//2000-02 - Support the Integrity of French Valley Airport 0 Resolution #2000-03 - Bank Accounts and Signatories of the Corporation 0 Resolution//2001-01 - Wolf Creek Specific Plan Referendum 0 Resolution //2001-02 - Proposed RCIP's Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan Affecting the City of Murrieta 0 Letter of Support to endorse SANDAG as the lead agency for the Interregional Partnership grant. O Letter of Support to endorse the City of Murrieta as lead agency for the Overall Economic Development Funds grant offered through HUD. Summary of Activity July 1, 2000 - June 30, 2001 Page 4 of 4 EDCSWRC staff attended and/or participated in the following meetings/events: WDC Partner meetings (3) WDC All-Staffmeetings (5) Riverside WDC All-Staff Meeting. Staff was invited to speak at the Riverside meeting on EDC activities and resource assistance. WDC Safety Team meetings (7). Staff is a committee member of the WDC Safety Team. Meeting with Kim Goodnough of Heritage Media to discuss marketing opportunities Meeting with Marilyn Ganly of Total Plan, Inc. to assist with networking opportunities Committee meetings for SWRC Career & Manufacturers Expo (4) Meeting with organizers of the City ofPerris EDC. Staffmet with Pen'is EDC members to assist with grass-roots organizational and marketing efforts. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY BALANCE SHEBT JUNE 30, 2000 ASSETS CUP~NT ASSETS Cash in checking - Calif. Bank & Trust Money Market - Calif. Bank & Trust Prepaid expenses TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT Equipment Less: Accumulated depreciation NET PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT $ (175) 63,300 2,134 16,076 (15,583) TOTAL ASSETS LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCE $ 65,259 493 $ 65,752 FUND BALANCE Fund balance, beginning Excess (deficit) of revenues over expenses TOTAL FUND BALANCE TOTAL LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCE $ 57,550 8,203 65,752 $ 65,752 See accountant's compilation report winifred A. Samstag, Certified Public Accountant Temecula, California ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION . SOUTh"WEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY STATEMENT OF REVENUES AND EXPENSES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 YEAR TO DATE REVENUES Memberships - cash City contract County contribution Special event revenue (golf) Quarterly luncheons Interest income TOTAL MEVENUES $ 39,328 26,500 25,000 17,474 4,049 2,005 114,355 EXPENSES PERSONNEL SERVICES Director - temporary services Director's medical reimbursement Secretary - temporary services consulting fees - Staff services TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES ADVERTISING~CONSULTING~INSURANCE Accounting Advertising Consulting fees - general consulting fees - Special Projects Insurance - general TOTAL ADVERTISING/CONSULTING/INSURANCE 48,311 333 7,145 38 55,827 1,500 195 490 7,086 2,213 11,484 DIRECT OPERATING EXPENSES office supplies Equipment repairs Telephone Postage Printing/copying/binding Dues/memberships/subscriptions Internet Website Conferences/training/workshops Travel Meals/entertainment Rent Taxes & licenses Legal fees Miscellaneous TOTAL DIRECT OPEPJ%TING EXPENSES 1,431 210 1,950 1,182 1,946 259 68 1,932 249 709 50 12,792 129 159 492 23,558 see accountant's compilation report Winifred A. Samstag, Certified Public Accountant Temecula, California ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY STATEMENT OF REVENUES AND EXPENSES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 DIRECT pROGRAM EXPENSE Membership (drive, directory, plaques) Public relations/marketing Quarterly luncheons Golf tournament TOTAL DIRECT pROGRAM EXPENSE YEAR TO DATE 11 50 4,796 9,094 13,951 EQUIPMENT EXPENSE Depreciation TOTAL EQUIPMENT EXPENSE TOTAL EXPENSES EXCESS (DEFICIT) OF REVENUES OVER EXPENSES 1,332 1,332 106,153 $ 8,203 See accountant's compilation report Winifred A. Samstag, Certified Public Accountant Temecula, California ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE FISCAL yEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 YEAR DATE NET CASH FLOW FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES EXCESS (DEFICIT) OF REVENUES OVER EXPENSES $ 8,203 ADJUSTMENTS TO RECONCILE NET INCOME TO NET CASH pROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES Depreciation and amortization (Incr.) decr. in prepaid expenses TOTAL ADJUSTMENTS NET CASH FLOW FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES 1,332 (115) 1,217 $ 9,420 CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND AND CASH EQUIVALENTS CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, ENDING $ 9,420 53,705 $ 63,125 See accountant's compilation report Winifred A. Samstag, Certified Public Accountant Temecula, california 2B ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY OPERATING AGREEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND THE TEMECULA VALLEY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, doing business as the ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY REGARDING THE PROVISION OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SERVICES This Agreement, made in triplicate, this 24th day of July, 2001, by and between the CITY OF TEMECULA, a Municipal Corporation, duly organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of California, (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and the TEMECULA VALLEY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, doing business as the ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY, a California nonprofit corporation (hereinafter referred to as "EDCSWRC") with reference to the following facts which are acknowledged by each party as true and correct: RECITALS A. The City is desirous of promoting its advantages as a business, industrial, and residential center; disseminating information relative thereto, and of propedy following up and giving consideration to inquiries made relative to the vadous activities of City of Temecula ("City") and its possibilities as such to residential, industrial, and business interests. B. The EDCSWRC has special knowledge, experience and facilities for accomplishing economic development activities. C. The City now desires to retain the EDCSWRC to accomplish vadous economic activities and the EDCSWRC is willing to be so retained pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. AGREEMENT NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between the parties as follows: OPERATIVE PROVISIONS 1. RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE EDCSWRC 1.1 The EDCSWRC shall undertake, dudng the 2001-02 fiscal year, to carry on the EDCSWRC's scope of services as listed in the attached executive summary (refer to Exhibit #1), which is attached to and made a part of this agreement. These services include business relations, business development, community outreach, and education programs. These duties may be adjusted from time to time as agreed upon by the EDCSWRC and the City. 1.2 The Administrator of the EDCSWRC shall prepare and submit to the City Manager and Assistant City Manager a monthly wdtten report specifying the activities of the EDCSWRC. Said report shall be prepared in a format acceptable to the City of Temecula and submitted to the City by the second Fdday of each month. ] R:\Wolnickg\Sponsorcd Events~EDCSWRC Agreement 2001 .doc 2. PAYMENT TO EDCSWRC 2.1 In consideration of the services to be performed by the EDCSWRC for the City as set forth in paragraph 1 hereof, the City hereby agrees to pay the EDCSWRC, the sum of $20,000. This shall be considered a payment for services rendered from July 1, 2001 through June 30, 2002. 2.2 In the event the City should desire any additional services, the EDCSWRC may, upon request of the City, furnish a proposal including, an itemized statement of the estimated cost thereof, and the City may modify or alter the proposal, or may reject the proposal in its entirety at its sole discretion, or may direct the submission of a new proposal which may be accepted, altered or rejected. Upon the final approval of any such proposal and execution thereof by the EDCSWRC and the City, as herein provided, the City will pay to the EDCSWRC the cost thereof and the EDCSWRC shall perform the services set forth in the proposal. All money due for carrying out said plan or proposal shall be supported by a detailed statement of the EDCSWRC showing the basis of said claims, and certified by proper officers of the EDCSWRC. 3. INDEMNIFICATION The EDCSWRC agrees that it will defend, indemnify and hold the City and its elected officials, officers, agents, and employees free and harmless from claims for damage to persons or property by reason of the EDCSWRC's acts or omissions or those of the EDCSWRC's employees, officers, agents or invitees in connection with their services rendered hereunder to the maximum extent allowed by law. 4. INSURANCE The EDCSWRC shall secure from a good and responsible company or companies doing insurance business in the State of California, pay for and maintain in full force and effect for the duration of this Agreement a policy of workers compensation and employers' Liability Insurance in which the City is the named insured or is named as an additional insured with the EDCSWRC and shall furnish a Certificate of Liability Insurance to the City Manager of the City of Temecula before execution of this Agreement. Notwithstanding any inconsistent statement in the policy or any subsequent endorsement attached thereto, the protection offered by the policy shall: 4.1 Include the City as the insured or named as an additional insured covedng the services to be performed under this Agreement against all claims adsing out of, or in connection with, the Agreement. 4.2 Include the City, its officers, employees and agents while acting within the scope of their duties under this Agreement against all claims adsing out of, or in connection with, the Agreement. Provide the following minimum limits: General Liability: $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 combined single limit per accident for bodily injury and property damage. 2 R:\Wolnickg\S ponsore d Eve~ts\EDCSWRC Agreement 200 l.doc Workers' Compensation and Employers' Liability: Workers' Compensation limits as required by the Labor Code of the State of California and Employers' Liability limits of $1,000,000 per accident. 4.3 The insurer shall agree to waive all dghts of subrogation against the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers for losses adsing from work performed by the Contractor for the City. 4.4 Bear an endorsement or shall have attached adder whereby it is provided that, in the event of expiration or proposed cancellation of such policy for any reason whatsoever, the City of Temecula shall be notified by registered mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, not less than thirty (30) days before. 4.5 Any deductible or self-insured retention must be declared to and approved by the City of Temecula. At the option of the City, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductible or self-insured retention as respects the City, its officers, officials and employees; or the EDCSWRC shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigation claim administration and defense expenses. 5. ATTORNEY'S FEES Should any litigation be commenced between the parties hereto conceming the provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party in such litigation shall be entitled to reasonable attomey's fees, in addition any other relief to which it may be entitled. 6. TERM This Agreement shall be effective for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2001, and terminating June 30, 2002. 6.1 This Agreement may be terminated for any reason, by either party upon thirty (30) days wdtten notice with any sums due and payable hereunder for services actually performed. 7. ENTIRE AGREEMENT This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material. R:\Wolnickg\Sponsored Evants\EDCSWRC Agreement 2001.doc CITY OF TEMECULA IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. TEMECULA VALLEY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, doing business as the ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY Jeff Comerchero, Mayor Gary Youmans, President ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk Phil Oberhansley, Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter Thorson, City Attorney Agency Information Economic Development Corporation Of Southwest Riverside County 27447 Enterprise Circle West, Suite 101 Temecula, CA 92593-1388 R:\Wolnickg\$ponsored Events~EDCSWRC Agreement 2001.doc 4 EXHIBIT #1 EDCSWRC's Scope of Services R:\Wolnickg\Slx~nsored Events\EDCSWRC A~ceement 2001.doc ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY Implementation Plan 2001-2002 Executive Summary The Implementation Plan was put together from information that was developed in a series of discussion groups as well as input from the general membership. Information was solicited from economic development experts and provided during focused discussions. The plan will center on six key areas. The plan is not limited to the following and will have the ability to add or delete items as needed with Board approval. The key areas that will be part of the plan are as follows: 1. Retain and expand businesses in Southwest Riverside County. 2. Create a synergy between the business community, public agencies, education and training facilitators, and economic development o[ganizations in the region. 3. Facilitate a streamlined environment where the public and private entities can work in partnership for the c[eation, and retention of employment in the area. 4. Develop an information sou/ce via newsletters, luncheons, and seminar presentations to create a source of public education forums to assist all businesses. 5. Be a focal point of local efforts to promote and enhance a healthy economy. 6. Support a business environment that promotes economic growth and creates a desirable lifestyle in which members of the community and live and work. In order to reach these objectives, the EDC must continue to expand its membership to better fund the efforts outlined above. Membership expansion will also attract additional expertise that the EDC can draw from to meet goals. Currently, membership is centered in the Temecula area; further membership from Murrieta and Lake Elsinore will be needed to meet the regional goals that are a pa~ of this organization. This expansion will include civic and trade organizations that also have the common goal of building a strong economic business community. Southwest Riverside County needs the EDC to be the organization that will take a leadership role, with its primary goal to develop quality jobs in the area. Successful facilitation of this plan will ensure that businesses in the area will expand, new businesses will be attracted to the area, and more jobs will be generated. With new jobs created, the over-50% commuter population within Southwest Riverside County may find work in the area. This will produce the perfect balance between an already desirable place to live and a business climate that will support its residents. 3A TEMECULAVALLEY FILM COUNCIL SUPPORT INFORMATION BUSINESS PLAN "The purpose of the Temecula Valley Film Council is to attract and facilita.t.e location production in the Temecula Valley by acting as a halson between the film industry and the community. By actively seeking filming, video production, and still photography, direct economic benefit will be generated to the area through location fees and the purchase of goods, services and labor. Residual tourism benefits will arise from area exposure in film, television and print." The Temecula Valley Film Council is devoted to making Temecula the "not so secret valley" where the future is happening. We are making every effort to tell the wodd that this is a truly viable film and photographic community. The Inland Empire Film Commission has noted a decrease in area service requests by major film companies and is attributing this decrease to the Canadian government's very generous new policies toward film companies filming in Canada. This influence has also been felt in Temecula. We are seeing the production end of the business moving out of Los Angeles and looking for more cost-effective environments, even out of the country. Computerization in the film industry is creating new companies, and technology is allowing them to look for new homes outside the Los Angeles/Hollywood area. Through our presence at trade shows and our year round marketing efforts, we can attract these businesses to our area. We are also putting forth a major effort to attract commercial filming and still photography to the Temecula area. We have been in existence for nine years. Once again, in cooperation with the Arts Council and Arts Fest 2001, we are producing the 12th Annual Talent Showcase and will continue our support of the City of Temecula's Tourism and Marketing programs and the Cultural Arts Plan. As agreed upon in the past, the Temecula Valley Film Council will no longer be responsible for the production of the Temecula Valley International Film Festival, but in a cooperative effort, we are working with Cinema Entertainment Alliance to facilitate the production of the Temecula Valley International Film and Music Festival 2001. Page 2 RECAP of TVFC ACCOMPLISHMENTS FY 2000-2001 TVFC was contacted by Eddie Hunt, who was looking for a warehouse to rent for interior filming. Stacy Sievek met with Mr. Hunt and was able to find a Temecula warehouse. Hunt's movie, "In My Blood" filmed in Temecula for approximately one week Jn February. Estimated spending in the area was $750 to $1000 a day. TVFC received a request for permitting information on night filming on the Overland Bridge. As this is a new venue, we are working with the City's Planning Department to develop new guidelines. 2 one-day shoots for commercials were completed. Both shoots were conducted on private property. Propaganda.films shot 2 days of commercials at Circuit City in the Promenade mall. Still photos of Temecula Valley historical sites were taken during the Temecula Valley Museum docent training tour. As some of the locations are on County property, those photos will be shared with the IEFC for their files. Large home properties were photographed in the DeLuz area for possible exterior locations and sent to the locations scout, Jennifer Scott. Locations scout, Billie Romery, requested an empty/closed automobile dealership for filming. Contacts were made with Paradise Chevrolet, Norm Reeves and Guidant (their parking lot is a closed automobile dealership), Paradise and Norm Reeves were unable to participate due to moving and renovations. Guidant was willing to help and Romery was able to contact them directly. We will follow up on this August filming. Locations were requested for private photo shoots with horses (engagement and wedding pictures.). Local "country" settings and the wineries information were provided Script supervisor and locations manager, Tom Martin, requested photo files of wineries, trees and mountain views. We were able to provide these locations and will follow up. Universal/3~ Line Productions was contacted by the Film Council during their shoot of the film "Redline" on county roads near Hemet and the new reservoir. They were given information about businesses, hotels, and restaurants in Temecula. Due to the filming location, Hemet was chosen for their production headquarters. This filming was supervised by the IEFC. The production company will be returning in late September or October. We have offered our services and will keep in contact. Page 3 RECAP (cont.) · Local filmmaker, Joe Azerelli, will be producing and directing a film in Temecula using a strip mall on Margarita Road. Production should begin in October. TVFC is working with Mr. Azerelli on a continuing basis. This project was extended and filming took place in January. · Representatives of a Texas business firm have shown interest in production in · Temecula:-With the help of the-EDC, we areproviding their representative with current information they have requested. · Interesting rock formations just outside of Temecula were used to film segments of"Sorority Girls Revenge". Ibex Productions filmed in our area for 3 days and stayed in Temecula. Four of the young ladies in the film were originally from the Temecula Valley area. · Ralph Coleman of Miramax Studios requested locations and information on local lakes with buildings near the water, specifically Elsinore and Skinner for filming in December and January, The Film Council was able to provide information and photographs including additional locations of Vail Lake and Lake Village. · Dudng the planning stages and throughout the Film Festival students from Chaparral High School have been filming interviews and production work of the Temecula Valley International Film Festival. They are currently in post- production work on this video film production about the making of a film festival. This is a school project and maybe entered into next year's festival in the Student Film category. Their teacher, Mark Jones, feels that this has been a great experience for the students. · Two filmmakers with entrees in this year's festival, Julie Stemock of Greenstemp Productions and Clifton Huang of Summertime Productions, have scripts they feel can be filmed in Temecula and have asked the Film Council to work with their Artistic Directors to break down the scripts and find possible locations in this area. · The Film Council received 4 telephone leads for unique location sites and we have made appointments to shoot these locations in October and add them to our locations file.. · Representatives of Cyclops Productions in New York requested location photos of Temecula Vineyards. Photos were sent overnight and follow up information was sent by regular mail. Cyclops confirmed that they received the photos. production is currently scheduled for Spring 2001 and no location has been chosen. We will stay in contact with Cyclops Productions. Page4 RECAP (cont.) · Jon Edwards took photographs of children enjoying the Temecula Valley Museum to accompany an article for Westways Magazine. · Locations request received for rolling hills area to land hot air balloons in a wedding scene. Asst. Production Manager, Michael Williams will be in Temecula in January to scout our suggested areas. Shooting would be 2 days with crew of 35 staying in Temecula · Jeannie Novak of indiespace, com, an independent music and film production company, has shown an interest in producing a world music festival in the Temecula area. Work is in progress. · Locations scout, James Woodward, requested current photos of vineyards for filming in the next 2 months. We indicated and he understood that the vineyards are out of season right now. File photos were provided and he indicated they would try again in the spring. Citrus groves were also suggested and photos were sent. · We received a referral from Dan Click of Sunrise Balloons for aerial filming to be done in February or March. We will be working closely to provide all services needed. This will include 2 nights stay for a crew of up to 35. · "Mountain Top" has received a script which is currently being researched for Temecula Valley production locations. TVFC is working closely to provided all the needed resources. · Responding to a City Council Meeting request by Councilman Sam Pratt for help in providing television coverage for Temecula Students of the Month presentations, TVFC contacted Sally Myers for details of their needs. She has provided us with a video copy of what is shown in Murrieta. We are arranging to have the presentations video taped and edited by film students at Chaparral High School We are contacting Adelphia Cable to work out television airing time. __ _The first, taping will be in February-March. · "Mountain Top" has received a script which is currently being researched for -Temecula Valley production locations. Temecula locations were acceptable but too expensive for production. CANADA has made an offer for locations and production crews which is unbeatable in the US. We are still in contact with the production company. · The first taping of the Temecula Students of the Month was done on February 26th. Unfortunately there were camera problems and only half of the tape was usable. The students from Chaparral High School will use this tape to practice editing for next time. The next filming will be on March 26· with the hopes of getting on TV the second week of April... RECAP (cont.) Page 5 · Dick Reed Photography of Phoenix shot film for two days in the Wine Country for Subaru Ads using points of interest in Southern California. Callaway, Wilson Creek and Palomar wineries were used. · Thanks to a referral from the Chamber of Commerce, TVFC coordinated with GPI Corporation from Toronto as they filmed in Hart Winery, the wine country and Old --Town: Wewere-able to arrange-for-the GPI film crew tomeetwith Councilman Jeff Stone for an on camera interview about what makes Temecula a great tourist destination. This film will be shown as part of GPI's television show "Distant Roads" which is directed at RV travelers and will be shown on the KPXN (PAX) cable network. Thank you to Councilman Stone who made an excellent presentation as usual. MARKETING Support production of the Seventh Annual Temecula Valley International Film Festival. Temecula Valley Film Council website (opened in September 2000) maintenance and linkage to local, state, national and international location film libraries and users. Trade Show and Film Festival attendance and participation. Show Biz Expo (Temecula Booth), AFCI-Locations 2000 & 2001 (Temecula booth), Palm Springs Film Festival, Hollywood Film Festival and any other geographically suitable expos or festivals. Participation and membership in the Association of Film Commissioners International. "Develop public awareness/ Encourage Temecula Valley community involvement in both Film Council promotions and Film Festival attendance through seminars, press releases and a speakers bureau. Page 6 OUTREACH At *Annual Regional GREAT TEMECULA SHOOTOUT (February 2001) In cooperation with local photography clubs and classes and with local sponsorship, our intent is to encourage location still photography in the Temecula ama through distribution.of disposable cameras to the public. TVFC will develop the film, pick appropriate photographs and produce a series of local POSTCARDS and a CALENDAR called "Temecula Through Our Eyes ". The postcards will be used for monthly contacts to film and photo production companies and the calendars will be sent toward the end of the year. Both items will be made available to retail businesses in Temecula, as there are virtually no current photos available for tourists. More photographs will be exhibited to the public, participants will be given title credit when their pictures are used, and this will enlarge and replenish the Film Council's locations photo library (negatives and images become the property of the Film Council). Production of Talent Showcases 2001 and 2002 in cooperation with the Arts Council and Ads Festival. Expanded Temecula area FAM tours in cooperation with the Inland Empire Film Commission and Tourism Council. Location scouts, producers, directors, cinematographers, writers, magazine editors and photographers and supporting staff will be taken on tours to explore the Temecula area and possible location sites for _film, television and commercial productions. Encourage film industry related businesses in the Temecula Valley in cooperation with the EDC and the City. Sponsor educational workshops about industry related issues. "What do I do when a film company wants to use my property?" "1 want to make a movie. Now what should I do?" What is a Film Festival and why should I care?" Page 7 OPERATIONS Expand and maintain Locations Photo Library. Increase still photo and video library and expand to include digital library. Update and maintain the Film Production Guide. This-is-an on going-project to-include all current businesses. Increase public awareness and support of the Film Council. Press releases, promotions and educational materials will be distributed through newspapers, magazines, trade journals, radio, cable TV and the Intemet. Develop committees and volunteer groups for year round activities and festival support. Publicize the Temecula area within the context of filmmaking activities and the opportunities and benefits presented to local merchants, businesses and local media support services through the production of a newsletter. Continue cooperation with the Arts Council and establish the role of the Film Council in Temecula's Cultural Arts Plan. Daily management of filmmakers' requests, and production and support service information to the industry. Ongoing education for local merchants of filmmaking opportunities. Promote relocation of film crews and film companies to the area to generate film activity and new jobs. GOALS Generate higher awareness of the Temecula area by targeting production companies through professional mailing materials, attendance at trade shows and film festivals, participation in industry organizations. Due to Canadian influences to the film industry, possible strikes, and physical changes in Temecula, there will be a new and very evident change in the focus of our efforts toward commercial and still photo production. We have and are finding greater success in these areas. Page 8 GOALS (cont.) 2. Support production of the annual Film Festival, Generate operating income through fund raising events such as the Talent Showcase, "Groat Temecula Shootout' postcards and calendars, ad sales in the Production Guide and community support. 4. Design and implement tracking systems for production in this aroa. With our recognized presence in the extremely competitive market of film production and the expanding numbers of film commissions world wide, the Temecula Valley Film Council has dedicated itself to the continuation of a high level of professionalism in providing its services to the Temecula aroa. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES · Maintain at least a pad-time Program Coordinator to manage the Temecula Valley FilmCouncil,which will provide a focal pointfor film related activities. · Respond to location requests from production companies and/or the Inland Empire Film Commission · Assist with location scouting when requested by the Production Company and/or the Inland Empire Film Commission. · Maintain a location library (including digital files); provide location images to the industry upon request, including Email requests. · Update and maintain, on an on going, basis the Temecula Valley Film Production Guide. · Market the Temecula Valley at industry trade shows including Temecula organizations such as the hotels/resorts, Film Festival and Chamber of Commerce/Tourism representatives. · Maintain the web site for the Film Council and establish important internet links. · Actively support the efforts of the organizers of the 2001 Temecula Valley International Film and Music Festival. These efforts will include but are not limited to the use of volunteers and providing speakers on behalf of the Film Festival for community organizations and groups within the Temecula Valley. · Encourage the establishment of film related businesses in Temecula. · Develop a core of film industry related production companies in the Temecula Valley area for referral and as examples of successful local industry business (EDC). · Host a series of educational seminars for the purpose of educating the community to the benefits of film production, how to become involved in the industry tocally, career opportunities, etc. FILMING IN TEMECULA... As the film liaison for the City of Temecula, the Temecula Valley Film Council offers free, dependable liaison and location services to filmmakers. There is no permit fee charged for filming in Temecula. The issuance of a Film in Permit however, is required. All permits for use of all our city and local county property, hiring of off-duty personnel and rental of city and county equipment are coordinated through this office. Locations usually require a 48-hour notice. Surrounding cities and unincorporated areas within the Temecula Valley have separate requirements, as do county roads, state highways and facilities. A certificate of insurance with a minimum orS1 Million of coverage is required. Proofoflnsurance fir property damage is also required for use of public and private property. The City of Temecula must be named as the primary insured or the additional insured. The Film Council will assist you schedule police, sheriff, highway patrol or fire personnel when needed. A 48-hour notice is required in order to guarantee available personnel. All merchants or residents who will be affected are to be contacted by the production company at least a week in advance, preferably in person, and given a written memo on the details of the production with the contact names and phone numbers. In the State of California, all' minors (under 18 yrs. of age) must have a work permit and minors under the age of 16 must have a studio teacher on the set. When filming on public property, a comprehensive shooting and location schedule and a list of contacts, in case of emergencies or conflicts, must be submitted to the Film Council. The shooting schedule must include the list of locations, times, and frequency of use, the activity taking place on the property and any anticipated public impact. Reasonable advance notice must be given when changing the shoot schedule on public property. If your production includes credits, a "Thank you to the Temecula Valley Film Council" is requested. 2002 OPERATIONAL BUDGET REVENUE City of Temecula* Fundraising (estimated) $27,000.00 650.00 TOTAL REVENUE $ 27,650.00 EXPENDITURES Direct Operating Expense Personnel Services (PT 20 hrs a week) Internet/Website* Consulting Fees Insurance Office Supplies Telephone/Fax Postage* Printing/copying* (Postcards/Newsletters) Office Rent $ 9000.00 $750.00 none $1300.00 $1200.00 $1000.00 $1000.00 $2500.00 free Total Direct Operating Expense $16,750.00 Direct Program Expense Trade Shows** ( 2 shows Temecula only) Membership/Dues FAM Tours/Scouting Production Guide* $6000.00 $ 600.00 $1300.00 $3000.00 Total Program Expense $10,900.00 Total Film Council Expenses $27,650.00 *Reduced from 2000-2001 request. **Notably increased from 2000-2001 request to allow Temecula only booths at 2 trade shows. Locations Expo costs were much greater than expected. Temecula only booths allowed much greater representation and also resort, winery and Chamber involvement in promoting the Temecula Valley. 2000 - 2001 Financial Statement Budget 2000-2001 Actual 2000-200t Revenue City of Temecula 29,000 29,000 Fundraising Unknown Unknown TOTAL Revenue 29,000 29,000 Expenditures Direct Operating Expense Personnel 8400 8400 (20 hrs a week) Internet/Web Site 1200 1260 Insurance 1200 2460 Office Supplies 1200 1175 Telephone 1000 1100 Postage 1500 750 Printing/Copying 5000 2500 TOTAL Operating Expense 19,500 17,645 Direct Program Expense Trade Shows 3000 5550 Memberships/Dues 500 700 Tours/Scouting/Promo 1000 1253 Production Guide 5000 2802 TOTAL Program Expense 9,500 10,305 TOTAL Expenses 29,000 27,950 3B TEMECULA VALLEY FILM COUNCIL OPERATING AGREEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND TEMECULA VALLEY FILM COUNCIL This Agreement, made in triplicate, this 24th day of July, 2001, by and between the CITY OF TEMECULA, a Municipal Corporation, duly organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of California, (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and the TEMECULA VALLEY FILM COUNCIL, a California nonprofit corporation (hereinafter referred to as "TVFC') with reference to the following facts which are acknowledged by each party as true and correct: 1. Recitals. The Parties hereto agree that this Agreement is entered into with respect to the following facts, which are acknowledged by each party as true and correct. A. The City is desirous of promoting its advantages as a desirable, cooperative, efficient and multi-faceted location destination for the film, television and advertising industry and disseminating information relative to the various activities of City of Temecula ("City") and its possibilities as such to residential, industrial, and business interests. B. The TVFC has special knowledge, experience and facilities for disseminating information; and is organized for and equipped to carry on promotional activities on behalf of the City; and to publicize and exploit its advantages. C. Such activities are recognized by law as being in the public interest and servicing a public purpose. 2. Responsibilities of TVFC. TVFC shall undertake, dudng the 2001-02 fiscal year, to carry on promotional activities on behalf of the City; and to particularly render the following services. A. MARKETING 1. Support production of the Seventh Annual Temecula Valley International Film & Music Festival. 2. TVFC website maintenance and linkage to local, state, national and international location film libraries and users. 3. Trade Show and Film Festival attendance: Show Biz Expo (Temecula booth), AFCI-Locations 2001 (Temecula booth), Palm Spdngs Film Festival, Hollywood Film Festival and any other geographically suitable expos or festivals. 4. Participation and membership in the Association of Film Commissioners International. 5. Develop public awareness. Encourage Temecula Valley community involvement in both Film Council promotions and Film Festival attendance through press releases and a speaker's bureau. B. OUTREACH: 1. Annual Regional Great Temecula Shootout In cooperation with local photography clubs and classes and with local sponsorship, IEFC's intent is to encourage location still photography in the Temecula area, exhibit to the public, reward the participants and replenish the IEFC's locations photo library. 2. Production of Talent Showcases '01 and '02 in cooperation with the Arts Council and Arts Festival. Empire Film Commission. Expand Temecula area FAM tours in cooperation with the Inland 4. Encourage film industry related businesses in the Temecula Valley in cooperation with the EDCSWRC and the City. 5. Sponsor educational workshops about industry related issues. Possible topics include: '~Nhat do I do when a film company wants to use my property?" '1 want to make a movie. Now what should I do?" '~/Vhat is a Film Festival and why should I care?" C. OPERATIONS: 1. Update and maintain Film Production Guide 2. Expand and maintain Locations Photo Library Increase still photo and video library and expand to include digital library. 3. Increase public awareness and support of the Film Council. Press releases, promotions and educational materials will be distributed through newspapers, magazines, trade journals, radio and cable TV and the intemet. and festival support. Develop committees and volunteer groups for year round activities 5. Publicize the Temecula area within the context of filmmaking activities and the opportunities and benefits presented to local merchants, businesses and local media support services through the production of a newsletter. Continue cooperation with the Arts Council and establish the role of the Film Council in Temecula's Cultural Arts Plan. 6. Daily management of filmmakers' requests, and production and support service information to the industry. Ongoing education for local merchants of filmmaking opportunities. 7. Promote relocation of film crews and film companies to the area to generate film activity and new jobs. 3. Payment to TVFC. A. In consideration of the services to be performed by the TVFC for the CITY, as set forth in paragraph 2 hereof, the CITY hereby agrees to allocate $27,000 to fund the TVFC, which will be dispersed for the fiscal year of 2001-2002, payable on execution of this Agreement. B. In the event the City should desire any additional service, TVFC shall, upon request of the City, furnish a proposal including, an itemized statement of the estimated cost thereof, and the City may modify or alter the proposal, or may reject the proposal in its entirety at its sole discretion, or may direct the submission of a new proposal which may be accepted, altered or rejected. Upon the final approval of any such proposal and execution thereof, by TVFC and the City, as herein provided, City will pay to TVFC the cost thereof, and TVFC shall perform the services set forth in the proposal. All money due for carrying out said plan or proposal shall be supported by a detailed statement of TVFC showing the basis of said claims, and certified by proper officers of TVFC. TVFC shall not be entitled to receive any compensation for its services or usual expenses except by this agreement. 4. Monthly Report. The Executive Director of the TVFC shall prepare and submit to the City Manager and Assistant City Manager a monthly wdtten report specifying the activities of the TVFC, Said report will include but is not limited to contacts made upcoming events and current TVFC activities. The report shall be submitted by the second Fdday of each month. 5. Indemnification. TVFC agrees that it will defend, indemnify, protect and hold the City and its elected officials, officers, agents and employees free and harmless from all claims for damage to persons or property by reason of TVFC's acts or omissions of those of TVFC's employees, officers, agents or invites in connection with their services rendered hereunder to the maximum extent allowed by law. 6. Insurance. TVFC shall secure from a good and responsible company or companies doing insurance business in the State of California, pay for and maintain in full force and effect for the duration of this Agreement a policy of comprehensive automobile and workers; compensation and employees' Liability Insurance in which the City is the named insured or is named as an additional insured with the TVFC and shall furnish a Certificate of Liability Insurance to the City Manager before execution of this Agreement by the Agency. Notwithstanding any inconsistent statement in the policy or any subsequent endorsement attached thereto, the protection offered by the policy shall: A. Include the City of Temecula, its elected officials, officers, agents and employees as the insurers or named as additional insurers covedng the services to be performed under this Agreement against all claims adsing out of, or in connection with, this Agreement. B. Provide the following minimum limits: 1. General Liability: $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. 2. Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 combined single limit per accident for bodily injury and property damage. 3. Workers' Compensation and Employers Liability: Workers' Compensation limits as required by the Labor Code of the State of Califomia and Employers' Liability limits of $1,000,000 per accident. R:\Wolnickg~S pon~ ored Event skFilm Council Agreement 200l.doc 2 C. The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against the City, its officers, officials, agents and employees for losses adsing from work performed by the TVFC for the City. D. Bear and endorsement or shall have attached adder whereby it is provided that, in the event of expiration or proposed cancellation of such policy for any reason whatsoever the City of Temecula shall be notified by registered mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, not less than thirty (30) days before date of expiration of cancellation is effective. E. Any deductible or self-insured retention must be declared to and approved by the City of Temecula. At the option of the City, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductible or self-insured retention as respects to the City, its officers, officials, agents and employees; or the City shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigation claim administration and defense expenses. 7. Attorney's Fees. Should any litigation be commenced between the parties hereto concerning the provision of this Agreement, the prevailing party in such litigation shall be entitled to reasonable attorney's fees, in addition to any other relief to which it may be entitled. 8. Term. This Agreement shall be effective for the fiscal year commending July 1, 2001, and terminating June 30, 2002. 9. This Agreement may be terminated by either party upon thirty (30) days written notice and if terminated, TVFC shall pay to the City that portion of the fee, which has not actually been expended on the work described in Attachment 3. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement as of the date first wdtten above. TEMECULA VALLEY FILM COUNCIL CITY OFTEMECULA Maggie Allen, Executive Director Temecula Valley Film Council 27740 Jefferson Ave., Suite 100 Temecula, CA 92590 Jeff Comerchero, Mayor ATTEST: Susan Jones, CMC City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney 4A INLAND EMPIRE ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP SUPPORT INFORMATION The Numbers Are in] ... The Inland Empire Economic Partnership (IEEP) accounted for 87 leads and 1,625 inquiries which were pursued by the Business Development staff ... of which the estimated economic impact (with- out multipliers) is $123.9 million to our regional economy ... The staff also hosted 12 site tours of the region's industrial and commer- cial properties _. The Inland Empire Film Commission (IEFC) regis- tered 2,479 total days of film activity and 2,380 requests for loca- tions, with 115 permits issued in San Bernardino County, 63 issued in Riverside County, 158 issued for the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), and 2 for the U.S. Forest Service for an economic impact of $81.1 million ... The Inland Empire Small Business Development Center (IESBDC) reported the creation of 197 jobs and the retention of 129, for an economic impact of $19.4 million ... and its staff coun- seled 2,223 clients for 10,357 client hours, and conducted 132 training events for some 2,255 attendees, setting an all-time record. In recent years, the Inland Empire has become known as one of America's "fastest growing" regions based on significant increases in population, personal income, and real estate con- sumption. Today, at the start of the 21st Century, we can assert with pride that our region has earned yet another title, as the "Job Creation Leader" in the entire state of California. Last year we saw our region eclipse the "One Million Job" plateau, while a changing eco- nomic landscape continues to emerge and offer new challenges in areas such as high tech- nology, sustainable growth, and workforce development. IEEP anticipated these challenges and some time ago instituted programs to address them. Growth and change will no doubt continue to advance in every direction. As you know, the Inland Empire Economic Partnership (IEEP) brings together leaders from our region's business community, our cities, counties and educational institutions. Future prosperity is dependant upon our determination to foster a regionally competitive business climate, while maintaining the quality of life that we so much enjoy. We are proud of our accomplishments, and know that it has been possible only through your commitment and involvement. Together, we will make 2001 another banner year for Southern California's Inland Empire. Sincerely, Robert Robie 2000 IEEP Chairman Arnold Dickson 2001 IEEP Chairman Teri Ooms President & CEO, IEEP Inland Empire Economic Partnership Annual Report 2000 · Southern California's inland Empire, the region we call 'home,' continues to grow and improve, and is today one of the fastest-growing metropolitan areas in the country. It is California's leader in business development and job growth, and has outpaced every other region in the state, accounting for 275,900, or forty percent of California's new jobs during the last 10 years. This economic expansion of the region has been illustrated by a dynamic increase in population and personal income. The region's population, greater than that of 20 states, increased from 1.6 million in 1980 to 3.2 million in 2000, with another million expected by 2010. Total personal income has risen from $16.1 billion in 1980 to $66.4 billion in 1998, a figure greater than that of 18 states. The year 2000 also saw the Inland Empire surpass the "one million employee" milestone! Much of this economic growth has been augmented by the business development and marketing efforts of the Inland Empire Economic Pa~nership (IEEP), the region's only private, non-profit economic development organization. Our mission is to attract, create, incubate and retain business in order to increase the economic vitality and growth of the area, thus enhancing quality of life for all. The IEEP came into existence in 1993 as a result of a merger. Riverside County's economic development program, known as 'Keep Riverside Ahead', joined efforts with the San Bernardino County-based 'Inland Empire Economic Council' to form today's IEEP, -- an eco- nomic development company serving the entire 27,000 square mile region. The 180 public and private sector entities that constitute the membership of IEEP are united as a regional partnership, advancing goals and objectives that benefit the entire two-county region in areas such as business, government and education. IEEP's efforts to attract new businesses are grounded in the many attributes our region offers: Available land; Affordable Real Estate; Immediate access to the Pacific Rim, Asia, and Latin America; Favorable lease and operating costs; A sophisticated transportation infra- structure of air, road and rail transport; and some 27 colleges and universities (including seven research institutions) that produce a highly-skilled and educated work force. In the arena of business development, tEEP provides numerous services to both businesses and site selectors in the form of cost benefit analysis, economic indicators, site tours, competitor analysis, and relocation assistance plans. From initial contact through final move-in, IEEP professionals provide customized assistance to clients throughout the country who are considering the Inland Empire as the next step in their business success. January 2000 ,A,.nnual Inst,,allation event lea Star Wars theme tures NAF'fA Corridor Conference in Ontario Fishing Derby at Chino's Prado Dam Grant I~eceived from ARCO Foundation MO&M trade show in Anaheim inland Empire Economic Partnership Annual Report 2000 Our Ret]ion ,,. Our Partnership The Inland Empire has appropriately been referred to as "The Location for Innovation." The region that produced California's first hydroelectric plant in the San Bernardino Mountains in 1887 is today developing tech parks that will lead the region into the digital age. The rugged horse trails of the early 1800's have evolved into a complex transportation infrastructure of railways, freeways, airports, and cross-docking facilities, serving a vital role in domestic and international trade. The former Air Force bases that once trained our military have been converted to ports of business and commerce· The economy of the Inland Empire is undergoing a significant transformation within today's · changing economic landscape. Once dependant upon agriculture, national defense and heavy industry, the region's economy will soon be driven by telecommunications, internet engineering, biotechnology, advanced multimedia, and other forms of new technology. The emergence of high technology is illustrated by many area successes. These include: Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI), a Redlands company that is a global leader in geographic information systems; Optivus Technology of San Bernardino, which is marketing the world's only proton therapy particle accelerator (designed in conjunction with Loma Linda University Medical Center) for non-invasive cancer treatment; International Rectifier, a Temecula operation that designs and produces computer chips; I/O Software, a Riverside company that has developed recognition software for the next generation of computer ~;e,~/~,~z,)z~.~/ security systems; and Watson Pharmaceuticals, headquartered in ' ~~ '~,~ _'- '· ! Corona, which manufactures generic drugs and works closely with the ~~-~'~ -~ ~, faculty at UC Riverside· Among the panelists at the NAFTA Conference were (from left) Mexican Consul Juan Salgado, economist John Husing, Ph.D., and University of Redlands professor James Pick, Ph.D. While the IEEP's primary objective is business development, it is today managing other economy-enhancing activities such as education and workforce development (IEEIC), small business development (IESBDC), regional tourism, and the region's film commission (IEFC). The IEEP also takes positions on legislation and issues affecting the region, ranging from the preparation of our students for the digital economy, to transportation and international trade. Propositions 35 and 39 were among the measures supported by the IEEP Government Affairs Committee in 2000, and both were successful on the November ballot. Prop 35 authorizes the use of private sector engineers and architects on highway and rail transit projects, while the latter establishes a 55 percent voter approval for school construction bonds in the state. A conference on the NAFTA Corridor, co-sponsored by lEER examined the future of commerce between Mexico and the United States, and how it will affect the Inland Empire region. The ua 2000 t~ebr ~. o~source Center opens m Sen cARE Business ,,~ March 2000 Bernardino lEE? Sate ite Office Opens in lemecola W[5I[C Trade Show in NEPCON West trade show ~n Anaheim Los Angeles ions 2000 Global Expo in Los AngeleS Fishing Derby at Lake Locat. - cheon ~eatures Or. ?am Clute Gregory ,mbersh~p con ~eu Cp, on ~Educati°n~ 2 Inland Empire Economic Partnership Annual Report 2000 "NAFTA Corridor -- Building the Vision" conference featured experts and panel groups that addressed issues ranging from economic development and telecommunications to air quality and freeway maintenance. Panelists included representatives from SANBAG, the state Legislature, local universities, private business and the California Department of Transportation. The IEEP industry Breakfast Series made its debut in 2000. IEEP members, grouped by related industries, exchanged information on the challenges and advantages of doing business in the region. The meetings were instrumental in identifying issues that have been addressed in IEEP's strategic efforts for business attraction and retention. A pit row Terrace Suite at the California Speedway in Fontana proved to be a successful tool for membership development efforts during the NASCAR races in April, thanks to the Speedway administration. Potential clients were introduced to the bene- fits of membership while enjoying a spectacular view of the event. IEEP members participated in a Civic Entrepreneur Workshop in June, sponsored by Collaborative Economics and the lEER Participants discussed how they envisioned the region in twenty years, and a post-event survey found that emerging concerns included transportation, education, and economic development, while the greatest assets of the region appeared to be safety, health, and higher education. These priorities fit into the definition of "sustainability" -- an approach that balances the concerns for the economy, the environment, and social equity. The dialogue will provide the basis for a regional planning effort to coordinate, preserve, and enhance the area's many assets· IEEP Community Partners (from left) Bill Martinez of Creative Underground, Dolores Armstead of San Bernardino County, and Patricia Oakes-Melvin of Valley Economic Development Partnership (VEDC) par- ticipate in the Civic Entrepreneur Workshop. The IEEP Foundation presented the third annual Golf Classic in May at the Sierra Lakes Golf Club, a newly-opened, 18-hole, par 72 championship course in Fontana. Presented by Talbot insurance and Financial Service, the event garnered $10,000 for the non-profit IEEP Foundation, which relies on fundraising and special events to support the work of the lEER As a non-profit corporation representing the voice of economic development in Southern California's Inland Empire, the IEEP serves as a clearing house for regional economic thinking, networking and action· With the unified effort of our public and private sector members, the IEEP will continue to work on all fronts to ensure regional prosperity in the 21st Century. April 2000 Fishing Derby at Lake Silve~wood LeCture by Steven teV~, Ph.D., on GroWth & Land Use Site Se~eCtOTS hosted at California May 2000 Fabulous Fairs & Festivals of the Inland Empire event Annual IEEP Foundation Go f Classic at Sierra Lakes Golf Cub IESBDc is honored at SBA Awards Speedway Luncheon in Orange · eon [esen~ embe~sh~p LunCh P sses" Members · M ~ ~,~, "Business Succe ~z.~ h~P.Luncheon on Inland Empire Economic Partnership Annual Report 2000 Business Attractions, Expansions, Relocations Flavio Nunez and Linda Thompson of: Rancho Cucamonga were among the Community Partners who assisted at trade shows. · The Inland Empire Economic Partnership (JEEP) is committed to business attraction, expansion, relocation and incubation. Successful business attraction efforts by IEEP in the year 2000 resulted in several significant corporate relocations to the region. Among these are Nationwide Credit, Inc., a leader in accounts receivable management, which opened its new 50,000 sq. ft. Riverside facility, and Home Shopping Network (HSN) which anticipates opening its newly constructed 817,750 sq. ft. regional distribution center in Fontana within months. Ashley Furniture, the country's fifth largest furniture manu- facturer, is building a 831,000 sq. ft. distribution and manufacturing center in Cotton, projected for completion in May. Its $30 million capital investment will also include construction of an adjacent 70,000 sq. ft. retail facility. The IEEP Technology Coalition Roundtable engaged in successful retention efforts to ensure that Highland-based technolo§y company OmniVision maintained its operation in the Inland Empire. Similar retention efforts had a positive outcome with HD Plastics of Ontario, STC Plastics of Chino, American Maid of Corona, and EGR, an Australian-based manufacturer of automotive parts located in Ontario. The California Trade & Commerce Agency, Southern California Edison (SCE), San Bernardino County Jobs & Employment Services, the Small Business Development Center (IESBDC) and local cities such as Ontario, Riverside and Chino also participated in these successful retention efforts. Marketing Efforts... · Regional, national and international marketing efforts were utilized to create an awareness of Southern California's Inland Empire. IEEP's annual marketing campaign included print advertising, trade shows, an internet web site, a Fact Book and CD-ROM, and the Inland Empire Review which is sent by direct mail to national and international site selectors and corporate real estate professionals. Community Partners and IEEP staff participated in a trade show circuit that included the MD&M, NEPCON, WESTEC, High Desert Opportunity and WESCON events in Anaheim and Los Angeles. JEEP staff attended several symposiums, which attract real estate professionals from around the globe, and engaged in trade missions to Germany and the United Kingdom. . ~ Show OiamO , ~t ~'~ KVCR.~,. . Ontario ~e u0ng ,uncheon in~emecu'a ]t~:~:: p~_ ~ oeglns airing 0f 'lEc*~ ~ Venture forum u , ~ l~,~, a~ner lot Success" ~uc~ Your II c~i. ~ntrepreneUr Wor~Su°P _ I'~::~:~''SUStainable Co ..... ~ 1 ..... · - award at EADL ~'~; t announce ...... uu~ SU~ey resul 4 Inland Empire Economic Partnership Annual Report 2000 The business television program "Endeavors," dedicated to regional business development, aired two segments on local PBS station KVCR. IE£P's Fact Book received a 'Best of Class' award in the international marketing competition sponsored by the American Economic Development Council (AEDC) at its 75th annual conference in Dallas. Forbes Magazine will again highlight the merits of our region in a special advertising section scheduled to appear in the May 28, 2001 issue of Forbes and Forbes Global. The Forbes Investment Forum Breakfast & "Kickoff Event" in October garnered considerable attention from the news media, and encouraged area businesses and institutions to consider sponsorship in the supplement which will reach 5 million readers around the globe. Forbes Chairman Caspar Weinberger, former U,S. defense secretary, was the featured speaker at this successful event. Forbes Magazine Chairman Caspar Weinberger, guest speaker at the "Kickoff Breakfast," is joined by IEEP vice presidents Rhonda Whittaker (left), Dianna Skeens, and Sarah Miggins. [] The new economy of the Inland Empire is illustrated by the emergence of technology-based companies throughout the region. The newly developed Inland Empire High Technology Committee (IEHTC) has designated funding that will allow IEEP staff to improve the awareness of technology-related programs and initiatives in the Inland Empire. High Technology Growth... A trade show attendee tdes his putting skills at the IEEP booth, as Moreno Valley3 Jerry Conley looks on. IEEP will also continue its work with IEHTC to manage several strategies designed to strengthen communication between research universities and service providers in tt~e region. The project's objectives are to strengthen infrastructure and stimulate the attraction, growth and retention of technology clusters in the region. IEEP is also studying over 1,200 global companies in an effort to attract them to the region. Diamond Valley ~ese~oir~ Inland Empire Economic Partnership Annual Report 2000 5 Small Business Development... · An important component of a region's economic vitality is the cultivation of small business, and the Inland Empire Small Business Development Center (IESBDC) offers confidential one-on- one guidance and expertise in business planning, expansion strategies, marketing, and loan assistance to area residents. In 2000, the iESBDC broadened both its scope and its horizons! WF. LCOME 1'0 THE I ' LAND EMPIRE DiA/V?v i:; VENTURE FORUI Finalists of the IESBDC's annual Diamond Venture Forum made presenta- tions to 25 investors at Riverside's Mission Inn. The IESBDC established a full-time office and special technical assistance program in Riverside County's Desert Communities Empowerment Zone, and is preparing to open its fifth full-time office which will serve Ontario, Chino, Rancho Cucamonga, Upland, Montclair and Chino Hills. It also established the CARE Business Resource Center in San Bernardino, which serves as a resource location center for area small business owners and entrepreneurs. The debut of the Diamond Venture Forum luncheon programs was met with great enthusiasm. The June event, coined "The Gong Show," was held in Temecula, while the ,!uly event, "Who Wants to Fund a Future Millionaire," was held in Ontario. High tech companies from the region presented their business plans to a panel of venture capitalists and angel investors. The culmination of these events was the annual Diamond Venture Forum, held in October at Riverside's Mission Inn, where nine companies made presentations to some 25 investors. The premier of "Inland Empire SBDC, Your Partner for Success," began airing on KVCR local public television in July. The program continues to air throughout the region. Mike Stull, IESBDC director, was recognized by the Association of Small Business Development Centers (ASBDC) as California's "Star Performer" at their 20th anniversary celebration. Developing Tomorrow's Workforce ... · The inland Empire Economic Investment Collaborative (IEEIC) brings together leaders from business and education, and is committed to preparing students for the new economy. The iEEIC is a program that was conceived and created by Riverside Community College, Riverside County Economic Development Agency, Riverside County Department of Public Social Services, Riverside County Superintendent of Schools, San Bernardino County Jobs and Employment Services, and the San Bernardino County Superintendent of Schools. The IEEIC awarded $129,958 in grants to eight school districts in 2000 for programs that link education with 6 Inland Empire Economic Partnership Annual Report 2000 business, provide professional development, and introduce industry skill standards for future curriculum development. School districts receiving grants were Palm Springs Unified, Jurupa Unified, and Desert Sands Unified, in Riverside County, along with Apple Valley, Ontario-Montclair Unified, Victor Elementary Unified, and Hesperia Unified, in San Bernardino County. IEEIC's Staff Development Institute provided training in the amount of $24,000 to professionals working in education, economic and workforce development. "CallPoint," a one-stop service that helps local businesses find and train qualified employees, was also initiated in 2000. The new system simplifies the maze of current programs into a comprehensive, aligned system of services, and is co-sponsored by regional educational, employment, and economic development agencies. The CallPoint system can be activated by calling 1-800-941-8222. Representing school districts receiving Workforce Development grants from the IEEIC, with Program Manager Janice Moore (from left), are Ron William of SBCSS, DE Gall Zwart of RCC, Marc Christiansen of Riverside County EDA, and Ken Schmidt of RCOE. · The Inland Empire's diverse natural settings provide a multitude of unique film locations that have depicted everything from the Swiss Alps to the Sahara Desert in Hollywood features. Our region hosts more entertainment productions than any two-county region in the state except for Los Angeles and Ventura counties, producing an economic impact of $80 million peryea~ Film Entertainment Production,,. The Inland Empire Film Commission (IEFC) processes film and production permits for filming, television, commercials and music videos, and last year acquired responsibility for the County of Riverside, the Palm Springs Desert Resort Convention and Visitors Authority, the U.S. Forest Service and the Bureau of Land Management (BLM). Secretar~ of the Interior Bruce Babbitt named IEFC Director Sheri Davis to the BLM California Desert District Advisory Council, which represents over 10 million acres of public land. The IEFC participated in the Locations 2000 Global Expo in March, and The Film Commission the ShowBiz Expo 2000 in June. The IEFC hosted "Bearfest," the inaugural Big Bear Lake promoted the area's diverse sub regions with International Film Festival in September, where it presented the "Digital Bear~est" workshop, this unique airport set at The Film Commission also presented the annual "California On Location" Awards at the the Show Biz Expo 2000. November 2000 ~ ~r 2000 Long Beach .... e-tion at Mission ~nn / / ~ ~111~"~7~' 'ac / IEEP Annual Legislative .e~ v * Workshop on "~ax Exempt Bond ~ ~ ~ Inland Empire Economic Partnership Annual Report 2000 7 IE£C Director Sheri Davis was honored at the "California On Locations Awards." With her are staff members Rajan Shandil (left) and Scott McNauL Regional Tourism ... Queen Mary in Long Beach. The event recognizes the state's top film location professionals and production companies, and reinforced the theme of retaining film production in the state of California. Feature films produced in the Inland Empire, such as "Play it to the Bone," Space Cowboys," "Magnolia," "Dinosaur," and "Erin Brockovich" were among the movies that premiered to national audiences. Over 1073 productions for TV, movie, video and print were filmed and/or photographed in the region last year, for a total economic impact in excess of $55 million to the local economy (in spite of a six month SAG strike that deterred commercial production.) 2000 · As a component of the lEER the Inland Empire Tourism Council (IETC) carries out its mission of promoting regional tourism, which represents in excess of $5 billion annually to the region. The Inland Empire State Fair exhibit earned two Gold Medal Awards at the 147th annual California State Fair in Sacramento! The joint exhibit, developed by the IETC, featured natural resources and recreational activities of the Inland Empire North, Low Desert, Valley and Mountain sub-regions of the Inland Empire. As part of National Tourism Week, the IETC sponsored "The Fabulous Fairs & Festivals of the Inland Empire," which highlighted annual events such as the Riverside County Fair and National Date Festival, the Temecula Balloon & Wine Festival, the Route 66 Rendezvous, and the Renaissance Pleasure Faire. It sponsored tours of the region for travel writers, as well as fishing derbies in area lakes. The IETC also participated in the LA Times and Orange County Register travel shows, and produced a regional visitor's guide. Welcome New Members ... · IEEP Membership Development welcomed many new Partners during 2000! Congratulations to California Capital, Diversified Pacific, Salomon Smith Barney; UPS; Brickley Environmental Remediation, Native Building Corp., Citrus Medical Group, Inc., J.R. Freeman Co.; Troy Clarke Media; Creative Underground; PE.net; Redlands Centennial Bank; Rose Institute of State & Local Government; Independent Colleges of Southern California (ICSC), California Steel; California Private Transportation Co. (91 Express Lanes); Empire Expansion Management; URS Corp.; Apple One Employment Services; Southern California Housing Development Corp., San Bernardino International Airport & Trade Center; SYNAGRO; Uber Advertising & Public Relations; Paperless Access, Inc.; GYL Decauwer CPA's; and Southern California Logistics Airport. Membership Development also published a new IEEP 2000-2001 ;Membership Directory & Resource Guide featuring more categories and a user-friendly design that promotes member- to-member business transactions. When searching for business contacts to maintain your company's competitive edge, make the guide your first source of information! 8 Inland Empire Economic Partnership Annual Report 2000 2000 Activity Report · Companies that relocated to the Inland Empire: Home Shopping Network Ashley Furniture Nationwide Credit TRM Manufacturing Astro Fab Phillips Lighting Company Relocation / Expansion Assists: The Scotts Company The Attek Group Tellus Technologies Swiftcom Companies retained in the Inland Empire: AMA Plastics STC Plastics EGR HD Plastics Omnivision Ticomp American Maid Summary: Financial impact: $123,987,015 Jobs Created: 1,520 Jobs Retained: 595 Inland Empire Economic Partnership, Inc. ASSES Feature Film Activity · (Partial List for 2000) CHARLIE'S ANGELS Columbia Pictures Starring Drew Barrymore, Cameron Diaz, Lucy Liu, Bill Murray, Sam Rockwell, Crispin Glover, Tim Curry & Kelly Lynch. Filmed in Fontana BLOW New Line Cinema Starring Johnny Depp, Penelope Cruz, Jordi Molla & Franka Pontente Filmed in Ontario DR. T & THE WOMEN Artisan Entertainment Starring Richard Gere, Helen Hunt, Farah Fawcett, Laura Dern, Shelley Long, Tara Reid, Kate Hudson & Liv Tyler Filmed on Silurian Dry Lake, Baker area THE KID Chester Films Starring Bruce Willis, Spencer Breslin, Emily Mortimer & Lily Tomlin Filmed in Coachella Valley THIRTEEN DAYS Mutually Assured Productions Starring Bruce Greenwood, Steven Culp Filmed in Victorville THE FAST AND THE FURIOUS Third Time Productions/Universal Starring Vin Diesel, Paul Walker, Rick Yune & Jordana Brewster Filmed in Riverside County, San Bernardino RAT RACE Paramount Pictures Starring Brecklin Meyer, Amy Smart, Whoopi Goldberg, Vince Vieluf, Seth Green, Cuba Gooding, Jr. & Jon Lovitz Filmed in Death Valley area; El Mirage DR. DOOLII-FLE II 20th Century Fox Starring Eddie Murphy; Filmed in Big Bear JURASSIC PARK III Universal Pictures Starring Sam Neill, William Macy, Laura Dem Filmed in El Mirage PLANET OF THE APES 20th Century Fox Starring Mark Wahlberg, Kris Kristofferson, George Clooney, Tim Roth, Helena Bonham Carter & Michael Clark Duncan Filmed in Trona Inland Empire Economic Partnership Annual Report 2000 9 IEEP Officers, ]anuary 2001 Chairman: Arnold Dickson, The Gas Company First Vice Chairman: George Reyes, Best Best & Krieger LLP Second Vice Chair & Treasurer: Mark Ostoich, Gresham, Savage, Nolan & Tilden Secretary: Russ Moore, Community Bank Assistant Secretary: Marcia McQuern, The Press-Enterprise Past Chairman: Robert Robie EDUCATION Cai Poly Pomona California State University San Bernardino Independent Colleges of So. Calif. Ontario Christian School Rose Institute/Ciaremont McKenna College San Bernardino Valley College University of California, Riverside University of Phoenix University of Redlands FINANCE / PROFESSIONAL SERVICES The Altek Media Group AppleOne Employment Services Arrowhead Credit Union The Arrowhead Group Associated Engineers, Inc. Bank of America Best Best & Krieger, LLP Burgess Moving & Storage Burke, Williams, & Sorensen, LLP Business Bank of California CA Private Transportation Company California Capital Companies Citizens Business Bank City National Bank Community Bank Community Works Design Group Creative Underground Davis & Graeber insurance Services Economics & Politics, Inc. Empire Expansion Management Enterprise Funding Corporation Entrepreneurial Hospitality Corporation Ernst & Young LLP Geographies Southern California logistics Airport GY1 Decauwer CPAs Gresham, Savage, Nolan, & Ti]den Miller & Schroeder Financial, Inc, Olivewood Cemetery Paperless Access, Inc. PE.net Provident Savings Bank Redlands Centennial Bank Reid & Hellyer Riverside Personnel Service, Inc. Robert Half International Ross, Landis, & Pauw, LLP IEEP Membership Roster, January 2001 Salomon Smith Barney Soren McAdam Chdstenson LLP Southwest Airlines Strategic Communications Stoorza Communications, Inc. Swenson Corporation Talbot Insurance & Financial Services, Inc. Technical Computer Services Thomas, Bigbie & Smith Troy Clarke Media Uber Advertising and Public Relations Union Bank of California Varner, Saleson, & Dobler, LLP Wells Fargo Bank GOVERNMENT / UTILITIES AGRICULTURE I MINING Eastern Municipal Water District Inland Empire Utilities Agency Pacific Bell Pomona Valley Transportation Authority Riverside County Transportation Commission San Bemardino Associated 6overnments (SANBAG) San Bernardino County Community & Cultural Department San Bernardino International Airport & Trade Center Southern California Edison Southern California Gas Company Verizon HEALTH CARE Arrowhead Regional Medical Center Citrus Medical Group Loma Linda University Medical Center Raincross Medical Group Riverside Community Hospital COMMUNITY PARTNERS (Local Government) Riverside County San Bernardino County Banning Chino Colton Grand Terrace Hemet Lake Elsinore La Quinta Loma Linda Moreno Valley Murrieta Norco Ontario Palm Springs Rancho Cucamonga. Rialto Riverside San Bernardino Temecula Twentynine Palms Yucca Valley LOGISTICS California Private Transportation Co. Southern California Logistics Airport San Bernardino international Airport & Trade Center UPS MANUFACTURING I HIGH TECH California Steel Industries, Inc. Crown Printers I:SRI FPC Graphics Imperial Rubber Products Johnson Machinery Mitsubishi Cement Optivus Technology Riverside Scrap Iron & Metal Robertson's Ready Mix Synagro Watson Laboratories Wiiden Pump & Engineering INLAND EMPIKE ECONOMIC PAKTNERSHIP 301 E. Vanderbilt Way, Suite #100 San Bernardino, CA 92408 MEDIA The Business Press inland Valley Daily Bulletin KCXX-FM/KATY-FM KGGI/KKDD-FM KVCR-TV Los Angeles Times The Press Enterprise San Bernardino County Sun NON-PROFIT Children's Fund Employer's Group Inland Valleys Assn. of Realtors NAIOP do Harley Knox Assoc. Sol, rare Council of Southern California So. Cal. Housing Dev. Corp. REAL ESTATE / CONSTRUCTION WiBiam Austin Co. Brickley Environmental Remediation Brithinee Electric C. B. Richard Ellis Century 21 Lois Lauer Realty Collins Commercial Corporation Diversified Pacific First American Title Insurance Glenborough Corporation Trust Grubb & Ellis Roy O. Huffman Roof Co. Lee & Associates - Ontario Lee & Associates - Riverside Matich Corporation Native Building Corporation PCMI The Expert Choice URS Corporation William Austin Company RETAIL / LODGING I ENTERTAINMENT Alvarez Lincoln/Mercury California Speedway Center Chevrolet H, ilton San Bernardino J. R. Freeman Co. (Xerox) Mission Inn Ontario Airport Marriott Patton Sales Corp. phone: (909) 890-1090 · fax: (909) 890-1088 · email: tooms@ieep.com · web: wv~v. ieep.com IEEP Budget 2001 Private Investments Deferred Revenue (SCE) Reach City/County Sub-total New Memberships Sub-total Less: .Loss reserves Sub-total Interest Income Work Force Development Grant Administration Revenue SBDC Empowerment Zone Events -- Annual Dinned9 member events Film Revenue Tourism Revenue Sub-total Total Revenue Administration Regional Marketing/Econ Dev Film Work Fome Development Grant SBDC Empowerment Zone Foundation Tourism Total Expense Net Reserve/Loss Budget 2001 476,700 20,000 666,262 1,162,962 98,876 1,261,838 88,945 1,172,893 2,500 18,750 76,719 1,186,843 82,500 30,000 120,000 35,000 1,552,312 2,725,205 294,015 706,967 243,617 28,443 1,264,449 82,500 31,719 73,496 2,725,205 0 4B INLAND EMPIRE ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP MARKETING PROGRAM AGREEMENT INLAND EMPIRE ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP COMMUNITY PARTNERS MARKETING PROGRAM AGREEMENT This COMMUNITY PARTNERS MARKETING PROGRAM AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is made and entered into this 24th day of July 2001, by and between the Inland Empire Economic Partnership, a non-profit mutual benefit corporation (hereinafter referred to as "IEEP") and the City of Temecula (hereinafter referred to as "SPONSOR"). RECITALS WHEREAS, SPONSOR desires to obtain certain marketing services from IEEP and IEEP desires to provide certain marketing services on behalf of SPONSOR, WHEREAS, the marketing services to be provided by IEEP pursuant to this Agreement shall be hereinafter referred to and known as the "Community Partners Marketing Program" or "MARKETING PROGRAM;" WHEREAS, MARKETING PROGRAM is designed to emphasize the economic, demographic and life-style facts and images of those certain geographic areas included within the boundaries of San Bemardino and Riverside counties, including the five eastern-most cities of Los Angeles County, hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Inland Empire" in order to: (1) Increase information available in the finance and real estate industries about the Inland Empire economy; (2) Increase the potential pool of employers interested in locating in the Inland Empire. WHEREAS, SPONSOR recognizes the benefits it may obtain through the attraction of new business and investment to the Inland Empire; WHEREAS, SPONSOR recognizes the need to promote the Inland Empire as a positive business environment; and WHEREAS, IEEP desires to provide, and SPONSOR desires to fund the MARKETING PROGRAM in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises contained herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, IEEP and SPONSOR agree as follows: SECTIONI SERVICES OFIEEP;TERM 1.1 Community Partners Marketing ProRram. Dudng the term of this Agreement, IEEP shall furnish all technical and professional services, including labor, matedal facilities, equipment, transportation, supervision and expertise, necessary to fully and adequately perform the following services, which shall constitute the Community Partners Marketing Program (MARKETING PROGRAM): A. MARKETING PROGRAM for Finance and Real Estate Industries and Potential Employers. IEEP shall in good faith and based on its discretionary determination that the following persons or entities exhibit some potential for conducting business in the Inland Empire, use its best efforts to contact and provide information on the Inland Empire to: (1) finance and real estate industry executives, (2) Southern California and other regional businesses, and (3) executives of national and international corporations. B. Trade Shows. IEEP shall attend trade shows, conventions and other meetings directly related to the purposes of this Agreement. IEEP shall prepare, transport and staff, as required, a trade show exhibit promoting the advantages of the Inland Empire to select markets, companies and industries. C. Other Terms. IEEP shall generally prepare, acquire and/or disseminate information to promote the Inland Empire as a location for business and investment, and shall carry out such other activities as may be reasonably necessary to achieve the purposes of this Agreement. The frequency of materials provided and the specific individuals and entities to be targeted by MARKETING PROGRAM pursuant to this Agreement shall be subject to IEEP's sole and absolute discretion. Except as set forth above, the IEEP's marketing efforts will include display advertising materials in publications chosen at the discretion of the IEEP. D. Schedule of Services. IEEP shall devote such time to the performance of the services under this Agreement as may be reasonably necessary for the satisfactory and timely performance of IEEP's obligations hereunder. E. MARKETING PROGRAM Performance Measures. IEEP shall monitor and report the results of MARKETING PROGRAM in accordance with the standards set forth in Exhibit "A" (IEEP Marketing Plan) attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 1.2 Term of Agreement. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement, the term of this Agreement shall commence on the date first set forth hereinabove and shall continue thereafter through and including June 30, 2002. From and after July 1, 2002, this Agreement shall terminate and the parties hereto shall have no further debt or obligation hereunder. 1.3 Representation. SPONSOR hereby grants to IEEP the dght to provide MARKETING PROGRAM on the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. IEEP, from time to time and pursuant to its sole and absolute discretion, may appoint and retain the services of employees and independent contractors, all at IEEP's cost and expense with funds provided by SPONSOR hereunder, to assist IEEP in the performance of its obligations under this Agreement. SECTION II COMPENSATION 2.1 Payments by Sponsor. IEEP shall receive compensation, for all services rendered under this Agreement. The total compensation shall not exceed nineteen thousand, ($19,000.00) without wdtten approval of SPONSOR's Representative ("Total Compensation"). The funding includes $16,146.00 membership dues and $2,854.00 for the High Tech Initiative Program. 2.2 Payment of Compensation. IEEP shall submit to SPONSOR an invoice pursuant to this Agreement. SPONSOR shall within thirty (30) days of receiving such invoice pay the Total Compensation indicated in Paragraph 2. I. 2.3 Additional FundinR. SPONSOR agrees that the IEEP is authorized to seek additional funding for MARKETING PROGRAM from other regional governmental bodies including, but not limited to, the San Bemardino Association of Governments, the Western Riverside Council of Governments, and the Inland Valley Development Agency. SECTION III GENERAL CONDITIONS 3.1 Sponsor's Representative. SPONSOR hereby designates James O'Grady, Assistant City Manager or his designee as SPONSOR's Representative to IEEP. SPONSOR's Representative shall have the authority to act on behalf of SPONSOR for all purposes under this Agreement and shall coordinate all phases of MARKETING PROGRAM on behalf of SPONSOR, including, without limitation, the delivery of materials requested by the IEEP for distribution to respondents in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. SPONSOR shall work closely and cooperate fully with IEEP's Representative and any other agencies, which may have jurisdiction over or an interest in MARKETING PROGRAM. SPONSOR's Representative shall be available to IEEP's staff at all reasonable times. SPONSOR shall notify JEEP in wdting of any substitution in SPONSOR's Representative. 3.2 IEEP's Representative. IEEP's President/Chief Executive Officer, or his or her designee, shall serve as IEEP's Representative and shall have the authority to act on behalf of IEEP for all purposes under this Agreement. 3.3 Oversight. To facilitate reasonable oversight of MARKETING PROGRAM by SPONSOR, IEEP agrees, dudng the term of this Agreement only, that SPONSOR shall be eligible to have representatives selected by the IEEP Board of Directors for membership on the IEEP Board of Directors. 3.4 Independent Contractor. SPONSOR retains IEEP on an independent contractor basis and IEEP is not an employee, agent or representative of SPONSOR. Any 3 personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of IEEP shall at all times be under IEEP's exclusive direction and control. IEEP shall have the dght to appoint or otherwise designate suitable and desirable employees, agents, independent contractors and representatives to perform services under this Agreement ("IEEP's Representatives"). IEEP's Representatives shall be subordinate to IEEP and subject to each and all of the terms, provisions, and conditions applying to IEEP hereunder. IEEP shall pay all wages, salaries, and other amounts due IEEP Representatives in their performance of services under this Agreement and as required by law. IEEP shall be responsible for all reports and obligations respecting IEEP Representatives, including, but not limited to, social secudty taxes, income tax withholdings, unemployment insurance, and workers' compensation insurance. SPONSOR is interested only in the results obtained by IEEP and MARKETING PROGRAM, and the IEEP shall have sole control of the manner and means of performing its obligations under this Agreement. Except as expressly set forth herein, SPONSOR shall not have the dght to require IEEP to periodically report to SPONSOR, conform to any fixed or minimum number of hours devoted to IEEP's obligations hereunder, follow prescribed itineraries, keep records of business transacted, make adjustments, bind SPONSOR, conform to particular policies of SPONSOR, or do anything else which would jeopardize the relationship of independent contractor between SPONSOR and IEEP. SPONSOR shall have no dght or authority to commit IEEP in any matter, cause, or thing whatsoever, without the pdor written consent of IEEP either hereunder or otherwise, or to use IEEP's name in any way not specifically authorized by this Agreement. 3.5 Termination. IEEP and SPONSOR shall have the right to terminate this Agreement and suspend their performance hereunder upon the occurrence of any of the following events: A. Breach of Agreement. Breach or default by SPONSOR or IEEP of any of the matedal terms, obligations, covenants, representations or warranties under this Agreement which is not waived in wdting by the non-defaulting party. In such case, however, the non-defaulting party shall first notify the other of such alleged breach or default and provide the other party with a pedod of thirty (30) days to cure the alleged breach or default. If the breach or default is not capable of being cured within a thirty (30) day pedod, then the defaulting party must commence a reasonable good faith effort to cure such breach or default within the thirty (30) day pedod and shall thereafter diligently pursue such cure to completion. B. Bankruptcy or Insolvency. IEEP or SPONSOR is declared insolvent or bankrupt, makes an assignment for the benefit of creditors, has a receiver appointed or any proceeding is demanded by, for or against IEEP or SPONSOR under any provision of the federal Bankruptcy Act o~ any amendment thereof. 3.6 Continuation of Services to other Participating Agencies. In the event this Agreement is terminated in whole or in part as provided in paragraph 3.5, IEEP may continue, upon such terms and in such manner as it has or may determine appropriate, to provide services similar to those provided' tO other Participating Agencies. 3.7 Inderrlnificatiorl. Each party shall defend, indemnify and hold the other party, its officials, officers, ernp!oyB~s aq,d. '~gents free and harmless from any and all liability from loss, damage, or injury '~ prope~y or persons including wrongful death, in any manner adsing out o.f .or incident to its ~le~li~rtt a~F,' omissions or willful misconduct arising out of or in connection with its performance ~[ this Agl;eement, including without limitation the payment of afforneys, 'fees. Further, each pa~y!~ha ~'d~[end at its own expense, including attorneys' fees, the other party, its officials, officers, employees, and agents in any legal action based upon such negligent acts, omissions or willful misconduct. 3.8 Notices and Requests. Any notice, demand, or request required or permitted to be given hereunder shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been duly delivered and effective on the third business day after having been deposited in the United States mail, postage prepaid, registered or certified, and addressed to the addressee as set forth below. If delivered by facsimile machine to such addressee, such notice shall be deemed to have been duly delivered and effective on the date transmitted. If delivered via overnight courier to such addressee, such notice shall be deemed to have been duly delivered and effective on the next business day. Any party may change its address for purposes of this Agreement by written notice given in accordance herewith. IEEP: INLAND EMPIRE ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP 301 East Vanderbilt Way, Ste. 100 San Bemardino, CA 92408 Attention: Ted Ooms Phone: 909-890-1090 Fax: 909-890-1088 SPONSOR: CITYOF TEMECULA P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589 Attention: Jim O'Grady Phone: 909-694-6444 Fax: 909-693-3903 3.9 Assignment Without Consent Prohibited. The dghts or obligations of any of the parties hereto may not be assigned or delegated, respectively, without the pdor written consent of the other party hereunder, which consent may be withheld in such party's sole and absolute discretion. Any assignment by either party hereunder shall not release such party from any of its obligations hereunder. Except as specifically provided above, neither party to this Agreement may, voluntarily or by operation of law, assign or otherwise transfer any of its dghts or obligations under this Agreement. 3.10 Exhibit. Exhibit "A" attached hereto is hereby incorporated by reference in this Agreement. Nothing contained in any such exhibit shall supersede or annul the terms and provisions of this Agreement, unless the matter set forth in the exhibit shall explicitly so provide to the contrary. In the event of any ambiguity in meaning or understanding between the provisions of this Agreement and the appended exhibit, the provisions of this Agreement shall control. 3.11 Entire Agreement. This Agreement, including the exhibit attached hereto, shall constitute the entire Agreement between SPONSOR and IEEP concerning the subject matter hereof and shall supersede all pdor and contemporaneous Agreements between the parties. 3.12 No Joint Venture or Partnership. SPONSOR and IEEP shall not, by virtue of this Agreement, in any way or for any reason, be deemed to be or have become a partner of the other in the conduct of its business or otherwise, or a joint venture. $ 3.13 Gender and Number. The use herein of the neutered -gender includes the masculine and the feminine and the singular number includes the plural, whenever the context so requires. 3.14 Captions. The captions and headings provided in this Agreement are inserted for convenience of reference only and do not define, descdbe or limit the scope or the intent of this Agreement or any of the terms hereof. 3.15 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed a fully executed original. 3.16 Attorneys' Fees. In the event either party commences litigation for the judicial interpretation, enforcement, termination, cancellation or recision hereof, or for damages for the breach hereof, then, in addition to any and all other relief awarded in such litigation, the prevailing party therein shall be entitled to a judgment against the other for an amount equal to reasonable attomeys' fees and court and other costs incurred. 3.17 Choice of Law. This Agreement shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 3.18 Modification and Waiver. No modification, waiver, amendment, discharge or change of this Agreement shall be valid unless the same is in wdting and signed by the party against which the enforcement of such modification, waiver, amendment, discharge or change is or may be sought. 3.19 Severability. In the event any term, covenant, condition, provision or agreement herein contained is held to be invalid, void or otherwise unenforceable by any court of competent jurisdiction, the fact that such term, covenant, condition, provision or agreement is invalid, void or otherwise unenforceable, shall in no way effect the validity or enforceability of any other term, covenant, condition, provision or agreement herein contained. 3.20 Binding Agreement. Subject to any limitation on assignment elsewhere set forth herein, all terms of this Agreement shall be binding upon, ensure to the benefit of and be enforceable by the parties hereto and their respective legal representatives, successors and assigns. 3.21 Time of Essence. Time is of the essence for each and every provision of this Agreement. 3.22 Prohibited Interests. A. Solicitation. IEEP maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for IEEP, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, IEEP warrants that it has not paid nor has it agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for IEEP, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement For breach or violation of this warranty, SPONSOR shall have the dght to rescind this Agreement without liability. B. Conflict of Interest. For the term of this Agreement, no member, officer or employee of SPONSOR, dudng the term of his or her service with SPONSOR, shall have any direct interest in this Agreement, or obtain any present or anticipated material benefit arising therefrom. 3.23 Equal Opportunity Employment. IEEP represents that it is an equal opportunity employer and it shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national odgin, ancestry, sex or age. Such non- discrimination shall include, but not be limited to, all activities related to initial employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed on the day and year first above wdtten. INLAND EMPIRE ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP CITY OF TEMECULA By: Teri Ooms President & CEO By: Jeff Comerchem Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter M. Thorson Agency Attomey 5A SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY ECONOMIC ALLIANCE SUPPORT INFORMATION Prepared by Stevie Hirdler Marketing Coordinator July 11,2001 ECQNO, M!C Plan S.W.R.C. ECONOMIC ALLIANCE Marketing Plan The cities of Lake EIsinore, Murrieta, Temecula and the County of Riverside, together, founded the Southwest Riverside County Economic Alliance in 1999. Due to positive results, the Southwest Riverside County Marketing for Business Attraction Agreement is being extended through June 31, 2002. The goal of the economic alliance is to stimulate economic development within the Southwest region. This marketing plan is designed to attract businesses and more specifically target bio-medical manufacturing, tele-communications and high-tech manufacturing businesses to the area. Some of the attributes of the Southwest Riverside County area are: a business friendly atmosphere, a high standard of living and high quality of life, a well educated work force, competitive housing prices, access to the major ports of Southern California, convenient freeway access, and close proximity to San Diego, Orange and Los Angeles counties. With this in mind, the marketing campaign will create greater recognition of the area outside the county limits and generate leads that will ultimately result in business start-ups and/or relocation to the area. Attract new business and investment to Southwest Riverside County as well as create new jobs in the region, targeting bio-medical and high tech manufacturing and tele- communications. Promote business development, economic opportunities, a skilled and educated work force as well as, quality of life of the region to business owners outside of the County's boundaries. Enhance the image of the Southwest Riverside County region and its abundant economic opportunities. Create a general awareness of the Southwest Riverside County region and its many benefits. Research/study demographics of commuter and labor market. Business owners and decision-makers in the high-tech manufacturing, tele-communications and bio-medical manufacturing fields. Executives of national and international corporations. Residents who commute outside the region to work. Venture Capitalists San Diego County Orange County Los Angeles County Nod[hem Califomia Printed Materials SWRC Economic/Demoqraphic Profile Cost: $3,500 Quantity: 5000 Date: August 2001 CD-ROMS Cost: $5,000 Quantity: 2500 (reprints) Date: TBD Brochures/presentation folders Cost: $5,000 Quantity: 2500 (reprint) Date: Fall 2001 Golf Bails Cost: $1,500 Quantity: 96 dozen (reprint) Date: Fall 2001 Advertising Radio Cost: $ 30,000 *Stations and Dates to be determined Newspaper/MaRazines* · Expansion Management Magazine Cost: $3, 800 *Currently researching other publications Television Cost: $35,000 *Stations and Dates to be determined Public Relations Regional Update Breakfasts Cost: $500.00 each Dates: February, June, September, December Business Visitation Cost: $0.00 (abso[bed in overhead) Dates: Ongoing Economic Development related meetinqs Cost: $ 0.00 (absorbed in overhead) Dates: Ongoing Trade shows · BIO 2001 Cost: $700.00 Dates: June 25-27, San Diego · Wescen Cost: $3,000 Dates: October 16-18, San Jose, CA Consultant Web-site Other · NACORE Cost: $1,600 Dates: September 22-25, Las Vegas, NV · Comdex Cost: $1,600 Dates: November 11-16, Las Vegas, NV Contract with Ron Nater for one year for consulting services Cost: $15,000 Dates: July 15, 01-June 30, 02 Update web-site to include GIS and Loop-net link specific to Southwest Riverside County Cost: $25,000 Date: TBD CommutedLabor Fome Study Cost: $0.00 - SANDAG grant Date: RFP release date in July MarketinR Campai,qn Timeline MarketinR Materials Development of marketing materials, to include demographic profile report specific for the Southwest Riverside County region, CD-ROM and promotional items. Targeted Completion Date- August 2001 Trade Show Attendance Attend industry specific trade shows throughout the contract year. Specific trade shows will be determined during on-going meetings with city and county representatives. Targeted Completion Date - Ongoing Print Media Advertisinq Development of targeted print media campaigns using publications that are industry specific. Advedising and press releases in local, regional and targeted area publications. Targeted Completion Date - Ongoing Multi-Media AdvertisinR CampaiRn Develop an industry specific campaign, such as the biomedical industry, high-tech manufacturing, tele- communications or another industry as determined by the parties hereto. Campaigns will include, but not be limited to, CD-ROM, billboards, radio, television, and direct mail and print media. Targeted Completion Date - Ongoing Business Visitation The county/city representatives and consultant will perform a minimum of eight (8) company visitations. This may include visits to Northern California or other locations as determined through on-going meeting with city and county representatives. Targeted Completion Date - Ongoing Public Relations The representative will attend various economic development related meetings that pertain to Southwest Riverside County. Targeted Completion Date - Ongoing Lead mana,qement The representative will respond to leads generated as a result of this marketing plan. It is the responsibility of the representative to send out identity package, conduct follow-up phone calls, schedule meetings with perspective businesses and assist businesses with the information needed in the expansion/relocation process. Targeted Completion Date - Ongoing Market Research/Survey Representative will research and study markets concerning economic development and marketing as it relates to Southwest Riverside County and develop an economic repod based upon these findings. Targeted Completion Date - Ongoing Proposed Budget Printed Materials $15,000 Consultant $15,000 Commuter/Labor Study* $18,000 *(due to grant approval, expenses unknovcn) Web-site $ 25,000 Advertising · Commercial $ 35,000 · Radio $ 30,000 · Magazines $12,000 Trade Shows $15,000 Promotional Items $ 1,500 Travel/Expenses $ 5,000 Misc. $ 8,500 Contingency Fund $ 28,548 Grand Total $208,548.00 This total includes the $ 73,548.17 rollover from the 00-01 fiscal year, which was allocated for a portion of the above expenses. 5B SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUN'rY ECONOMIC ALLIANCE MARKETING AGREEMENT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2O 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY MARKETING FOR BUSINESS ATTRACTION AGREEMENT This MARKETING PROGRAM AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is made and entered into this day of 2001, by and between the Cities of Temecula, Murrieta, and Lake EIsinore (hereinafter referred to as "Cities") and the County of Riverside (hereinafter referred to as "County") for marketing and business attraction services for the Southwest Riverside County region. RECITALS WHEREAS, Cities desire to obtain certain marketing services from County, and County desires to provide certain marketing and business attraction services on behalf of Cities, WHEREAS, the marketing and business attraction services to be provided by County pursuant to this Agreement shall be hereinafter referred to and known as the "Marketing Program," WHEREAS, Marketing Program is designed to emphasize the economic, demographic, and lifestyle facts and images of those certain geographic areas included within Southwest Riverside County bounded by the unincorporated communities of Temescal Canyon, Winchester, French Valley, Rancho California, and the Wine Country, as well as the Cities of Lake Eisinore, Murrieta and Temecula (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Southwest Riverside County") in order to: 1. Enhance the image of the Southwest Riverside County region as an area with abundant economic opportunities and quality of life; and 2.Stimulate private investment and job creation in the Southwest Riverside County economy; and 3. Attract new businesses to Southwest Riverside County, targeting bio-medical and high-tech manufacturing and tele-communications industries. -1- 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WHEREAS, Cities and County recognize the benefits they may obtain through the attraction of new business and investment to Southwest Riverside County; WHEREAS, Cities and County recognize the need to promote Southwest Riverside County as a positive business environment; and WHEREAS, County desires to provide, and the Cities to fund, the Marketing Program in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises contained herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, County and Cities agree as follows: SECTION 1 BUSINESS ATTRACTION SERVICES AND MARKETING PROGRAM 1.1 County Services. During the term of this Agreement, County shall provide one County staff representative, facilities for the County staff representative, equipment, transportation, supervision and expertise necessary to fully and adequately perform the following services including, handle procurement process of contracts and execute agreements on behalf of the Alliance., for Southwest Riverside County, which shall constitute the Marketing Program: A. Marketinq Proqram. County shall, in good faith and based on its discretionary determination that the identified person(s) or entity(ies) exhibit potential for conducting business in Southwest Riverside County, use its reasonable and best efforts to contact and provide information on the finance, real estate, manufacturing, and various other industries in the Southwest Riverside County economy to the following areas/individuals: (1) Southern California; (2) Northern California; and (31 executives of national and international corporations. The Marketing Program will consist of those items shown in Exhibit, "A" which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. -2- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1.2 B. Other Terms. County shall generally prepare, acquire and/or disseminate information to promote Southwest Riverside County as a location for business and investment, and shall carry out such other activities as may be reasonably necessary to achieve the purposes of this Agreement as identified in the Marketing Plan which has been attached hereto and made part hereof. The frequency of materials provided and the specific individuals and entities to be targeted by the Marketing Program pursuant to this Agreement have been identified by the parties hereto. C. Marketinq Proqram Performance Measures. County shall provide information to Cities outlining the results of the Marketing Program. Said information may include the following: number of business visitations, number of jobs created, number and description of business expansions/attractions, number and description of trade shows and conferences attended, description of media campaigns, description of training/employment links, and description of curriculum development. D. City Contacts. Each City member shall designate a liaison to work with the County in the implementation of the Marketing Program. The parties to this Agreement shall meet on a regular basis to review the marketing program. E. Business Retention. Business retention shall be the responsibility of the individual parties to this agreement. The Marketing Program shall be coordinated with these business retention efforts. Term of Aqreement. The term of this Agreement shall commence on the date first set forth herein above and shall end on June 30, 2002. From and after July 1, 2002, this agreement shall terminate and the parties hereto shall have no further debt or obligation // -3- 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2O 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 2 3 4 5 2.1 2.2 2.3 hereunder unless agreed upon by the padies hereto at which point the Marketing Program and funding levels will be reviewed and agreed upon by the parties hereto. SECTION II COMPENSATION Payments by Cities. County shall receive compensation for all services rendered under this Agreement from the Cities in the amount of One Hundred Thirty Five Thousand Dollars ($135,000), which shall be divided by the Cities in the following quantities: a) City of Temecula $75,000 b) City of Murrieta $50,000 c) City of Lake EIsinore $10,000' *City of Lake Elsinore will provide additional in-kind services not to exceed an additional $15,000. County will use the funds for the direct marketing activities listed in the Marketing Program under Attachment "A". County will not use funds for overhead expenses (valued at $135,000) such as those listed in Section 1.1 County Services. Funds not expended shall be refunded to cities on a pro-rata share or if agreement is extended funds shall be carried over to the new agreement period. Payment of Compensation. County shall receive two equal payments from Cities for total compensation shown in Section 2.1. First payment shall be provided to County within 30 days of execution of Agreement. Second payment shall be paid no later than January 31, 2002. County shall submit an invoice to Cities for both payments. Additional Fundinq. Cities agree that the County is authorized to seek additional funding for Marketing Program from other parties including, but not limited to, local utilities, State, and private entities. // // // -4- 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 2 3 3.1 4 5 3.2 SECTION III GENERAL CONDITIONS Indemnification. Each party shall defend, indemnify and hold the other party, its officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any and all liability arising out of or incident to its negligent acts, omissions, or willful misconduct arising out of or in connection with its performance of this Agreement, including without limitation the payment of attorneys' fees. Further, each party shall defend at its own expense, including attorneys' fees, the other party, its officials, officers, employees, and agents in any legal action based upon such negligent acts, omissions, or willful misconduct. Notice and Requests. Any notice, demand, or request required or permitted to be given hereunder shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been duly delivered and effective on the third business day after having been deposited in the United States mail, postage prepaid, registered or certified, and addressed to the addressee as set forth below. If delivered by facsimile machine to such addressee, such notice shall be deemed to have been duly delivered and effective on the next business day. Any party may change its address for purposes of this Agreement by written notice given in accordance herewith: Partners: City of Temecula Attn: Jim O'Grady 43200 Business Park Drive P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Phone (909) 506-5100 Fax (909) 694-6499 City of Lake Elsinore Attn: Marlene Best 130 S. Main Street Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 Phone (909) 674-3124 Fax (909) 674-2392 City of Murrieta Attn: Lori Moss 26442 Beckman Court Murrieta, CA 92562 Phone (909) 461-6002 Fax: (909) 698-9885 County: County of Riverside Attn: Stevie Field 27447 Enterprise Circle, West Temecula, CA 92590 Phone (909) 600-6066 Fax: (909) 600-6005 -5- 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed on the day and year first above written. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS By: Jim Venable, Chairman ATTEST: By: Deputy APPROVED AS TO FORM: COUNTY COUNSEL By: CITY OF MURRIETA By: Kelly Seyarto, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY By: II II CITY OF TEMECULA By: Jeff Comerchero, Mayor ATTEST: By: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY By: CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE By: Robert L. Schiffner, Mayor ATTEST: By: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY By: -6- 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2O 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 2 2. 3. 4. 5. Attachment "A" Implementation Plan Marketin.q Materials Development of marketing materials, to include demographic profile report specific fo~ the Southwest Riverside County region, CD-ROM and promotional items. Targeted Completion Date- August 2001 Trade Show Attendance Attend industry specific trade shows throughout the contract year. Specific trade shows will be determined during on-going meetings with city and county representatives. Targeted Completion Date - Ongoing Print Media AdvertisinR Development of targeted print media campaigns using publications that are industr~ specific. Advertising and press releases in local, regional and targeted area publications. Targeted Completion Date - Ongoing Multi-Media Advertising CampaiRn Develop an industry specific campaign, such as the biomedical industry, high-tech manufacturing, tele-communications or another industry as determined by the parties hereto. Campaigns will include, but not be limited to, CD-ROM, billboards, radio, television, and direct mail and print media. Targeted Completion Date - Ongoing Business Visitation The county/city representatives and consultant will perform minimum of eight (8) company visitations. This may include visits to Northern Californi or other locations as determined through on-going meeting with city and count~ representatives. Targeted Completion Date - Ongoing // // -7- 1 6. 2 3 4 7, 5 6 8. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2O 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Public Relations The representative will attend various economic development relateC meetings that pertain to Southwest Riverside County. Targeted Completion Date - Ongoing Lead manaqement The representative will respond to leads generated as a result ol this marketing plan. It is the responsibility of the representative to send out identity package, conduct follow-up phone calls, schedule meetings with perspective businesses and assist businesses with the information needed in the expansion/relocation process. Targeted Completion Date - Ongoing Market Research/Survey Representative will research and study markets concerning~ ! economic development and marketing as it relates to Southwest Riverside County andl develop an economic report based upon these findings. Targeted Completion Date - Ongoing // // // // // // // // // // // // // // // -8- ITEM 8 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY ~ DIRECTOROF FI NAN ~E__.~[~=~: CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City ManagedCity Council William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer July 24, 2001 Award of Construction Contract for Starlight Ridge Southern Cross Road Sidewalk Project - Project No. PW00-22 PREPARED BY: Amer Attar, Senior Engineer Bruce Levy, Assistant Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: Award a construction contract for the Starlight Ridge Southern Cross Road Sidewalk Project - Project No. PW00-22 to Elite Bobcat Service, Inc. in the amount of $51,790.00 and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract. Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $5,179.00, which is equal to 10% of the contract amount. BACKGROUND: On June 12, 2001 the City Council authorized the Public Works Department to solicit Construction bids. The project will include the installation of permanent sidewalks on the north side of Southern Cross Road between Rancho Vista Road and Margarita Road. This project will facilitate pedestrian safety and accessibility, especially for children and residents in the surrounding areas to walk to and from existing parks, schools and retail shops. The sidewalk will benefit pedestrian safety, encourage the use of alternate modes of transportation, and complete missing links in existing sidewalk improvements. In addition to the City, local area residents and the Temecula Valley Unified School District (TVUSD) are in support of this project. The engineer's estimate for this project was $58,680.00. Four bids were publicly opened on July 11,2001, and the results for the bid are as follows: 1. Elite Bobcat Service, Inc. $51,790.00 2. Cunningham-Davis Corporation. $61,450.00 3. S. Parker Engineering, Inc. $69,100.00 4. J.D.C., Inc. $79,220.00 1 R:'~AGDRPT~2001~0724\PW00-22.Awd. DOC Staff has reviewed the bid proposals and found Elite Bobcat Service, inc. to be the lowest responsible bidder for this project. Staff has contacted references and determined that Elite Bobcat Service, Inc. has satisfactorily performed similar type of work in the past. The specifications allow thirty (30) working days for the completion of this project. Work is expected to begin in August 2001 and be completed by early September 2001. A copy of the bid summary is available for review in the City Engineer's office. FISCAL IMPACT: The Starlight Ridge Southern Cross Road Sidewalk Project is a Capital Improvement Project funded by $40,160 of SB821 funds with the balance to be funded by the City through Capital Project Reserves. A transfer of Capital Project Reserves from the Date/Cherry Street Improvements from Murrieta Hot Springs Road to Margarita Road - Phase V project is necessary to cover the total construction cost of $56,969.00, which includes the contract amount of $51,790.00 plus the 10% contingency amount of $5,179.00. ATTACHMENT: 1. Location Map 2. Project Description 3. Contract 2 R:'~.G D R PT~2001\0724'~PW00-22.Awd,DOC CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CONTRACT FOR PROJECT NO. PWO0-22 STARLIGHT RIDGE SOUTHERN CROSS ROAD SIDEWALK PROJECT THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into the 24th day of July, 2001,by and between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CITY", and Elite Bobcat Services, Inc., hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR." WITNESSETH: That CITY and CONTRACTOR, for the consideration hereinafter named, mutually agree as follows: CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The complete Contract includes all of the Contract Documents, to wit: Notice Inviting Bids, Instructions to Bidders, Proposal, Performance Bond, Labor and Materials Bond, Plans and Specifications entitled PROJECT NO. PW00-22, STARLIGHT RIDGE SOUTHERN CROSS ROAD SIDEWALK PROJECT, Insurance Forms, this Contract, and all modifications and amendments thereto, the State of California Department of Transportation Standard Specifications (1992 Ed.) where specifically referenced in the Plans and Technical Specifications, and the latest version of the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, including all supplements as written and promulgated by the Joint Cooperative Committee of the Southern California Chapter of the American Associated General Contractors of California (hereinafter, "Standard Specifications") as amended by the General Specifications, Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO. PW00-22, STARLIGHT RIDGE SOUTHERN CROSS ROAD SIDEWALK PROJECT. Copies of these Standard Specifications are available from the publisher: Building New, Incorporated 3055 Overland Avenue Los Angeles, California 90034 (213) 202-7775 The Standard Specifications will control the general provisions, construction materials, and construction methods for this Contract except as amended by the General Specifications, Special Provision, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO. PW00-22, STARLIGHT RIDGE SOUTHERN CROSS ROAD SIDEWALK PROJECT. In case of conflict between the Standard Specifications and the other Contract Documents, the other Contract Documents shall take precedence over, and be used in lieu of, such conflicting portions. Where the Contract Documents describe portions of the work in general terms, but not in complete detail, it is understood that the item is to be furnished and installed completed and in place and that only the best general practice is to be used. Unless otherwise specified, the CONTRACTOR shall furnish all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and incidentals, and do all the work involved in executing the Contract. CONTRACT CA-1 R:~dp~projects~O0-22~Co ntract The Contract Documents are complementary, and what is called for by anyone shall be as binding as if called for by all. Any conflict between this Contract and any other Contract Document shall be resolved in favor of this Contract. SCOPE OF WORK. CONTRACTOR shall perform everything required to be performed, shall provide and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment, and all utility and transportation services required for the following: PROJECT NO, PW00-22, STARLIGHT RIDGE SOUTHERN CROSS ROAD SIDEWALK PROJECT All of said work to be performed and materials to be furnished shall be in strict accordance with the Drawings and Specifications and the provisions of the Contract Documents hereinabove enumerated and adopted by CITY. CITY APPROVAL. All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be furnished and work performed and completed under the direction and supervision, and subject to the approval of CITY or its authorized representatives. CONTRACT AMOUNT AND SCHEDULE. The CITY agrees to pay, and CONTRACTOR agrees to accept, in full payment for, the work agreed to be done, the sum of: FIFTY ONE THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED NINETY DOLLARS and NO CENTS ($51,790.00), the total amount of the base bid. CONTRACTOR agrees to complete the work in a period not to exceed Thirty (30) working days, commencing with delivery of a Notice to Proceed by CITY. Construction shall not commence until bonds and insurance are approved by CITY. CHANGE ORDERS. All change orders shall be approved by the City Council, except that the City Manager is hereby authorized by the City Council to make, by written order, changes or additions to the work in an amount not to exceed the contingency as established by the City Council. PAYMENTS LUMP SUM BID SCHEDULE: Before submittal of the first payment request, the CONTRACTOR shall submit to the City Engineer a schedule of values allocated to the various portions of the work, prepared in such form and supported by such data to substantiate its accuracy as the City Engineer may require. This schedule, as approved by the City Engineer, shall be used as the basis for reviewing the CONTRACTOR's payment requests. UNIT PRICE BID SCHEDULE: Pursuant to Section 20104.50 of the Public Contract Code, within thirty (30) days after submission of a payment request to the CITY, the CONTRACTOR shall be paid a sum equal to ninety percent (90%) of the value of the work completed according to the bid schedule. Payment request forms shall be submitted on or about the thirtieth (30th) day of each successive month as the work progresses. CONTRACT CA-2 R:~d p\proj~%'ts~#00-22~Conbact The final payment, if unencumbered, or any part thereof unencumbered, shall be made sixty (60) days after acceptance of final payment and the CONTRACTOR filing a one-year Warranty and an Affidavit of Final Release with the CITY on forms provided by the CITY. Payments shall be made on demands drawn in the manner required by law, accompanied by a cedificate signed by the City Manager, stating that the work for which payment is demanded has been performed in accordance with the terms of the Contract, and that the amount stated in the certificate is due under the terms of the Contract. Partial payments on the Contract price shall not be considered as an acceptance of any part of the work. Interest shall be paid on all undisputed payment requests not paid within thirty (30) days pursuant to Public Contracts Code Section 20104.50. Public Contract Code Section 7107 is hereby incorporated by reference. In accordance with Section 9-3.2 of the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction and Section 9203 of the Public Contract Code, a reduction in the retention may be requested by the Contractor for review and approval by the Engineer if the progress of the construction has been satisfactory, and the project is more than 50% complete. The Council hereby delegates its authority to reduce the retention to the Engineer. WARRANTY RETENTION. Commencing with the date the Notice of Completion is recorded, the CITY shall retain a portion of the Contract award price, to assure warranty performance and correction of construction deficiencies according to the following schedule: CONTRACT AMOUNT $25,000 0 $75,000 RETENTION PERIOD RETENTION PERCENTAGE 180 days 3% $75,00- $500,000 180 days $2,250 + 2% ofamountin excess of $75,000 Over $500,000 One Year $10,750 + 1% of amount in excess of $500,000 LIQUIDATED DAMAGES - EXTENSION OF TIME. In accordance with Government Code Section 53069.65, CONTRACTOR agrees to forfeit and pay to CITY the sum of One thousand dollars ($1,000.00) per day for each calendar day completion is delayed beyond the time allowed pursuant to Paragraph 4 of this Contract. Such sum shall be deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. Such sum shall be deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR will be granted an extension of time and will not be assessed liquidated damages for unforeseeable delays beyond the control of, and without the fault or negligence of, the CONTRACTOR including delays caused by CITY. CONTRACTOR is required to promptly notify CITY of any such delay. CONTRACT CA-3 R:~cip~p rojec~,~00-22~Contract 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. WAIVER OF CLAIMS. On or before making each request for payment under Paragraph 6 above, CONTRACTOR shall submit to CITY, in writing, all claims for compensation as to work related to the payment. Unless the CONTRACTOR has disputed the amount of the payment, the acceptance by CONTRACTOR of each payment shall constitute a release of all claims against the CITY related to the payment. CONTRACTOR shall be required to execute an affidavit, release, and indemnity agreement with each claim for payment. PREVAILING WAGES. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contract, from the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. These rates are on file with the City Clerk. Copies may be obtained at cost at the City Clerk's office of Temecula. CONTRACTOR shall post a copy of such wage rates at the job site and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. CONTRACTOR shall comply with the provisions of Section 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code. Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, CONTRACTOR shall forfeit to the CITY, as a penalty, the sum of $25.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any work done under this Contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of the Contract. TIME OF THE ESSENCE. Time is of the essence in this contract. INDEMNIFICATION. All work covered by this Contract done at the site of construction or in preparing or delivering materials to the site shall be at the risk of CONTRACTOR alone. CONTRACTOR agrees to save, indemnify, hold harmless and defend CITY, its officers, employees, and agents, against any and all liability, injuries, or death of persons (CONTRACTOR's employees included) and damage to property, arising directly or indirectly out of the obligations herein undertaken or out of the operations conducted by CONTRACTOR, save and except claims or litigations arising through the sole active negligence or sole willful misconduct of the CITY. The CONTRACTOR shall indemnify and be responsible for reimbursing the CITY for any and all costs incurred by the CITY as a result of Stop Notices filed against the project. The CITY shall deduct such costs from Progress Payments or final payments due to the CITY. GRATUITIES. CONTRACTOR warrants that neither it nor any of its employees, agents, or representatives has offered or given any gratuities or promises to CITY's employees, agents, or representatives with a view toward securing this Contract or securing favorable treatment with respect thereto. CONFLICT OF INTEREST. CONTRACTOR warrants that he has no blood or marriage relationship, and that he is not in any way associated with any City officer or employee, or any architect, engineer, or other preparers of the Drawings and Specifications for this project. CONTRACTOR further warrants that no person in its employ has been employed by the CITY within one year of the date of the Notice Inviting Bids. CONTRACT CA..4 R:~cip~projecls~0-22~Co nffact 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT. After the completion of the work contemplated by this Contract, CONTRACTOR shall file with the City Manager, its affidavit stating that all workmen and persons employed, all firms supplying materials, and all subcontractors upon the Project have been paid in full, and that there are no claims outstanding against the Project for either labor or materials, except certain items, if any, to be set forth in an affidavit covering disputed claims or items in connection with a Stop Notice which has been filed under the provisions of the laws of the State of California. NOTICE TO CITY OF LABOR DISPUTES. Whenever CONTRACTOR has knowledge that any actual or potential labor dispute is delaying or threatens to delay the timely performance of the Contract, CONTRACTOR shall immediately give notice thereof, including all relevant information with respect thereto, to CITY. BOOKS AND RECORDS. CONTRACTOR's books, records, and plans or such part thereof as may be engaged in the performance of this Contract, shall at all reasonable times be subject to inspection and audit by any authorized representative of the CITY. INSPECTION. The work shall be subject to inspection and testing by CITY and its authorized representatives during manufacture and construction and all other times and places, including without limitation, the plans of CONTRACTOR and any of its suppliers. CONTRACTOR shall provide all reasonable facilities and assistance for the safety and convenience of inspectors. All inspections and tests shall be performed in such manner as to not unduly delay the work. The work shall be subject to final inspection and acceptance notwithstanding any payments or other prior inspections. Such final inspection shall be made within a reasonable time after completion of the work. DISCRIMINATION. CONTRACTOR represents that it has not, and agrees that it will not, discriminate in its employment practices on the basis of race, creed, religion, national origin, color, sex age, or handicaP. GOVERNING LAW. The City and Contractor understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Contract and also govern the interpretation of this Contract. Any litigation concerning this Contract shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event of litigation between the parties concerning this Contract, the prevailing party as determined by the Court, shall be entitled to actual and reasonable attorney fees and litigation costs incurred in the litigation. PROHIBITED INTEREST. No member, officer, or employee of the City of Temecula or of a local public body shall have any interest, direct or indirect, in the contract of the proceeds thereof during his/her tenure or for one year thereafter. Furthermore, the contractodconsultant covenants and agrees to their knowledge that no board member, officer or employee of the City of Temecula has any interest, whether contractual, non-contractual, financial or otherwise, in this transaction, or in the business of the contracting party other than the City of Temecula, and that if any such interest comes to the knowledge of either party at any time, a full and complete disclosure of all such information will be made, in writing, to the other party or parties, even if such interest would not be considered a conflict of interest under Article 4 (commencing with CONTRACT CA-5 R:~cip~projects~0-22\Contra cl 22. 23. Section 1090) or Article 4.6 (commencing with Section 1220) of Division 4 of Title I of the Government Code of the State of California. ADA REQUIREMENTS. By signing this contract, Contractor certifies that the Contractor is in total compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Public Law 101- 336, as amended. WRITTEN NOTICE. Any written notice required to be given in any part of the Contract Documents shall be performed by depositing the same in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid, directed to the address of the CONTRACTOR as set forth in the Contract Documents, and to the CITY addressed as follows: Mailing Address: William G. Hughes Director of Public Works/City Engineer City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Street Address: William G. Hughes Director of Public Works/City Engineer City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590-3606 CONTRACT CA~ R:/cip~orojects~pw~0-22~Co ntract IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Contract to be executed on the date first above written. DATED: CONTRACTOR Elite Bobcat Service, Inc. 1320 E. Sixth St., 100 Corona, CA 92879 909-279-6869 By: Joe Nanci, CEO DATED: CITY OFTEMECULA APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Jeff Comerchero, Mayor Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk CONTRACT CA-7 R:~cip~p rojects~OO-22~Cont~act ITEM 9 APPROVAL ~]/~z,.~.-~ CITYATTORNEY ~ DIRECTOROFFINANCE_.~__,Z_ CITY MANAGER ~ TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City ManagedCity Council ,'~/{/Villiam G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer July 24, 2001 Maintenance Agreement - Habitat West, Inc. Five-year maintenance of the Long Canyon Detention Basin Project No. PW01-05 PREPARED BY: Greg Butler, Senior Engineer- Capital Projects RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve a five (5) year Maintenance Agreement with Habitat West, Inc. for a total not to exceed amount of $26,140.00 and authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement. BACKGROU ND: In October of 1999, the City entered into an agreement with Woodside Homes to accept the 5-year maintenance and monitoring requirements of the Long Canyon Detention Basin environmental mitigation area. The mitigation area was set up to satisfy the conditions of the Army Corp of Engineers permit issued for the Campos Verdes Development. The City maintenance staff does not have the expertise needed to maintain the native plant species and assure they meet the success criteria included in the Army Corp permit. Therefore informal bids were solicited from three (3) landscape contractor's specializing in this work. Of the three (3) contractors solicited, Habitat West, Inc. was the Iow bidder. Habitat West has done similar work for the City relating to the Pala Road Bridge Replacement project. Because the Army Corp permit requires the mitigation site to be maintained for a period of 5-years, Habitat West has prepared cost estimates to complete the entire 5-year maintenance obligation. The total cost has been broken down to the cost for the construction period and then costs for each of the 5- years required by permit. This initial contract will cover the construction inspection work necessary for the actual construction of the mitigation site as well as the first year's maintenance. Amendments to this original contract will be brought to council annually for the remaining four years. The total cost of the 5-year maintenance obligation will be $26,140.00. FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate funds are available in the Public Works FY2001-2002 Operating Budget in Account, No. 001-164-601-5275 for the first year of this agreement in the amount of $10,840.00. Subsequent fiscal appropriations will be necessary for each of the following four (4) years. ATTACHMENT: Agreement I R:~AGDRP~2001 ~0724\Habitat West Long Cyn Agree,DOC CITY OF TEMECULA CONTRACT AGREEMENT FOR MAINTENANCE OF THE Environmental Habitat Created within the Long Canyon Detention Basin PROJECT NO. PW01-05 THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into as of July 24, 2001 by and between the City of Temecula, and Habitat West, Inc.("Contractor"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. SCOPE OF WORK. Contractor shall complete all of the work described in the Scope of Work, attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit A. ("Scope of Work") and shall provide and furnish all the labor, materials, necessar7 tools, expendable equipment, and all utility and transportation services required for the Work. All of said Work to be performed and materials to be furnished for the Work shall be in strict accordance with the specifications set forth in the Scope of Work. The Work shall be completed within the ti me set forth in the Scope of Work. Contractor shall not commence the Work until such time as directed in writing by the City of Temecula. a. TERM. This Agreement shall commence on July 24, 2001, and shall remain and continue in effect until June 30, 2007, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. 2. COST OF WORK. For the Work described in Section 1 of this Agreement Contractor shall receive the sum of Twenty six thousand one hundred forty dollars and no cents ($26,240.00) for the total term of the Agreement unless additional payment is approved as provided in this Agreement. The Payment Schedule is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit B. Contractor shall not be compensated for any services rendered in connection with its performance of this Agreement that ara in addition to those set forth herein, unless such additional services are authorized in advance and in writing by the City Manager. Contractor shall be compensated for any additional services in the amounts and in the manner as agreed by the City Manager and Contractor at the time City's written authorization is given to Contractor for the performance of said services. The City Manager may approve additional work not to exceed ten percent (10%) of the amount of the Agreement, but in no event shall such sum exceed twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000.00). Any additional work in excess of this amount shall be approved by the City Council. 3. PAYMENT. Contractor will submit invoices monthly, or at another agreed to interval, for actual services performed. Invoices shall be submitted between the first and fifteenth business day of each month, for services provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice as to all non-disputed fees. If the City disputes any of contractor's fees it shall give written notice to Contractor within 30 days of receipt of an invoice of any disputed fees set forth on the invoice. 4. PERFORMANCE, Contractor shall at all times faithfully, competently and to the best of his or her ability, experience, and talent, perform all tasks described herein. Contractor shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of Contractor hereunder in meeting its obligations under this Agreement. Contractor shall cause a full time experienced Superintendent to be present on the site during all construction and to oversee and supervise the Work. I R:\C[P~PROJECTS~PW0 BPW01-05\0105Main~agrmt.dec 5. CITY APPROVAL. All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be furnished and work performed and completed subject to the approval of the City or its authorized representatives, and the quality of the workmanship shall be guaranteed for one year from date of acceptance. 6. CHANGE ORDERS. The City Manager may approve additional payment not to exceed 10% of the Agreement. Change orders exceeding these limits shall be approved bythe City Council. 7. WAIVER OF CLAIMS. On or before making final request for payment under Paregraph 2., above, Contractor shall submit to the City, in writing, all claims for compensation under or arising out of this contract; the acceptance by Contractor of the final payment shall constitute a waiver of all claims against the City under or arising out of this Contract except those previously made in writing and request for payment. Contractor shall be required to execute an affidavit, release and indemnify agreement with each claim for payment. 8. PREVAILING WAGES. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contractor from the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. These rates are on file with the City Clerk. Copies may be obtained at cost at the City Clerk's office of Temecula. Contractor shall post a copy of such wage rates at the job site and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. Contractor shall comply with the provisions of Sections 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code. Pursuant to the previsions of 1775 of the Labor Code, Contractor shall for-reit to the District, as a penalty, the sum of $25.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any work done under this contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of the Contract. Payroll records shall be submitted to the City with each pay request. Progress payments will be withheld pending receipt of any outstanding reports. 9. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT WITHOUT CAUSE. a. The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the Contractor at least ten (10) days prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Contractor shall immediately cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City suspends or terminates a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement. b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the City shall pay to Contractor the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination, provided that the work performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the Agreement pursuant to this Section, the Contractor wiII submit an invoice to the City pursuant to Section 3. 10. DEFAULT OF CONTRACTOR. a. The Contractor's failure to comply with the previsions of this Agreement shall constitute a default. In the event that Contractor is in default for cause under the terms of this Agreement, the City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Contractor for any work performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by written notice to the Contractor. If such failure by the Contractor to make progress in the performance of work hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Contractor's contrel, and without fault or negligence of the Contractor, it shall not be considered a default. 2 R:\CIP~PROJECTS~PW0 i~PW01 ~5\0105Maintagrmt.doc b. If the City Manager or his delegate determines that the Contractor is in default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the Contractor with written notice of the default. The Contractor shall have (10) days after service upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the Contractor fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement. 11. IN DEMNIFICATION. The Contractor agrees to defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, or liability of any kind or nature which the City, its officers, agents and employees may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of Contractor's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions in performing or failing to perform under the terms of this Agreement, excepting only liability arising out of the sole negligence of the City. 12. LIABILITY INSURANCE. Contractor shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property that may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Contractor, its agents, representatives, or employees. a. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as: (1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage (occurrence form CG 0001). (2) Insurance Services Office form number CA 0001 (Ed. 1/87) covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto). (3) Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Employer's Liability Insurance. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Contrector shall maintain limits no less than: (1) General Liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this projectJlocation or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. (2) Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage. (3) Employer's Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease. c. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City Manager. At the option of the City Manager, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers; or the Contractor shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense expenses. 3 R:\CIP~PROJECTS~PW01 ~PW01-05\0105Maintagrmt.doc d. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability policies ara to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions: (1) The City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Contractor; products and completed operations of the Contractor; premises owned, occupied or used by the Contractor; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Contractor. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers. (2) For any claims related to this project, the Contractor's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insured maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be excess of the Contractor's insurance and shall not contribute with it. (3) Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers. (4) The Contractor's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. (5) Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days' prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the City. e. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. f. Verification of Coveraqe. Contractor shall furnish the City with original endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be on forms provided by the City. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the District before work commences. As an alternative to the City's forms, the Contractor's insurer may provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements affecting the coverage required by these specifications. g. Contractor, by executing this Agreement, hereby certifies: "1 am aware of the provision of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which requires every employer to be insured against liability for Workman's Compensation or undertake self-insurance in accordance with the previsions of that Code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this Contract." 13. TIME OF THE ESSENCE. Time is of the essence in this Contract. 14. INDEPEN DENT CONTRACTOR. Contractor is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Contractor shall at all times be under Contractor's exclusive direction and 4 R:\CIP~PROJECTS~PW01 ~PW01-05\0105 Maintagrmt.doc control. Neither the City nor any of its officers, employees or agents shall have control over the conduct of Contractor or any of Contractor's officers, employees or agents, except as set forth in this Agreement. Contractor shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. Contractor shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind the City in any manner. No employee benefits shall be available to Contractor in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Contractor as provided in the Agreement, the City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Contractor for performing services hereunder for the City. The City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Contractor for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder. 15. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES. The Contractor shall keep itself informed of State and Federal laws and regulations that in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Contractor shall at all times observe and comply with all such laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Contractor to comply with this section. 16. CONTRACTOR'S INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION. No plea of ignorance of conditions that exist or that may hereafter exist or of conditions of difficulties that may be encountered in the execution of the work under this Contract, as a result of failure to make the necessary independent examinations and investigations, and no plea of reliance on initial investigations or reports prepared by the City for purposes of letting this Contract out to proposal will be accepted as an excuse for any failure or omission on the part of the Contractor to fulfill in every detail all requirements of this Contract. Nor will such reasons be accepted as a basis for any claims whatsoever for extra compensation or for an extension of time. 17. CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT. After the completion of the Work contemplated by this Contract, Contractor shall file with the City Manager his affidavit stating that all workmen and persons employed, all firms supplying materials, and all subcontractors on the Work have been paid in full, and that there are no claims outstanding against the project for either labor or materials, except certain items, if any, to be set forth in an affidavit covering disputed claims or items in connection with a Stop Notice which has been filed under the provisions of the laws of the State of California. 18. BOOKS AND RECORDS. Contractor's books, records, and plans or such part thereof as may be engaged in the performance of this Contract, shall at all reasonable times be subject to inspection and audit by any authorized representative of the City. 19. UTILITY LOCATION. The City acknowledges its responsibilities with respect to locating utility facilities pursuant to California Government Code Section 4215. 20. REGIONAL NOTIFICATION CENTERS. Contractor agrees to contact the appropriate regional notification center in accordance with Government Code Section 4215. 21. INSPECTION. The Work shall be subject to inspection and testing by the City and its authorized representatives during manufacture and construction and all other times and places, including without limitation, the plans of Contractor and any of its suppliers. Contractor shall provide all reasonable facilities and assistance for the safety and convenience of inspectors. All inspections and tests shall be performed in such manner as to not unduly delay the Work. The Work shall be subject to final inspection and acceptance notwithstanding any payments or other prior inspections. Such final inspection shall be made within a reasonable time after completion of the Work. 22. DISCRIMINATION. Contractor represents that it has not, and agrees that it will not, discriminate in its employment practices on the basis of race, creed, religion, national origin, color, sex, age, or handicap. 5 R:\CIP~PROJECTS~PW01WW014)5\0105Maintagrmt.doc 23. WRITTEN NOTICE. Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (i) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice: To City: City of Temecula P O Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, California 92590 Attention: City Manager To Contractor: Habitat West, Inc. 938 S. Andreasen Dr., Suite F Escondido, CA 92029 (760) 735-9378 24. ASSIGNMENT. The Contractor shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of the City of Temecula. 25. LICENSES. At all times during the term of this Agreement, Contractor shall have in full force a nd effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the services described in this Agreement. 26. GOVERNING LAW. The City and Contractor understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event of litigation between the parties concerning this Contract, the prevailing party as determined by the Court, shall be entitled to actual and reasonable attomey fees and litigation costs incurred in the litigation. 27. PROHIBITED INTEREST. No member, officer, or employee of the City of Temecula or of a local public body shall have any interest, direct or indirect, in the contract of the proceeds thereof during his/her tenure or for one year thereafter. Furthermore, the contractodconsultant covenants and agrees to their knowledge that no board member, officer or employee of the City of Temecula has any interest, whether contractual, non- contractual, financial or otherwise, in this transaction, or in the business of the contracting party other than the City of Temecula, and that if any such interest comes to the knowledge of either party at any time, a full and complete disclosure of all such information will be made, in writing, to the other party or parties, even if such interest would not be considered a conflict of interest under Article 4 )commencing with Section 1090) or Article 4.6 (commencing with Section 1220) of Division 4 of Title I of the Government Code of the State of California. 28. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or wdtten, are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entedng into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material. R:\CIP~PROJECTS~PW01 ~PW01-05\0105Maintagrmt.doc 29. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT. The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Contractor warrants and represents that he or she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Contractor and has the authority to bind Contractor to the performance of its obligations hereunder. IN WITN ESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OFTEMECULA Jeff Comerchero, Mayor Attest: Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk Approved As to Form: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney CONTRACTOR HABITAT WEST, INC. 938 S. Andreasen Dr., Suite F Escondido, CA 92029 (760) 735-9378 By: Gigi Hurst, President, CEO 7 R:~CIP~PROJECTS~PW01 ~PW01-05\0105Maintagrmt.doc MAINTENANCE OF THE Environmental Habitat Created within the Long Canyon Detention Basin PW01-05 EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF WORK MAINTENANCE SERVICES A. General: Contractor shall maintain all plants in a vigorous, thriving condition bywatedng, weeding, cultivating, and any other necessary operations during the entire period of installation and until final acceptance by the Owner as advised by the Project Biologist. Improper maintenance that may cause the poor condition of planted material at termination of the scheduled contract period shall cause postponement of final acceptance of work. Payment for annual maintenance activities shall be made monthly in accordance with the annual bid amount. Upon termination of maintenance activities the Contractor shall be paid the pro rata amount for the year in which the contract is terminated. The Owner shall pay for metered water used for watering landscape materials. B. Weeding: 1. Weeds shall be removed by the Contractor at lease once a month dudng the first two years, once every four months for years three and four, and twice a year during year five. More frequent monitoring will be preformed as necessary or as recommended by the Project Biologist to keep weeks at manageable levels. A licensed Pest Control Advisor shall be consulted if specific pest control recommendations are required. 2. Weeds and their root systems shall be removed completely, and watering shall precede weeding if necessary to facilitate root removal. Manual weed removal is preferred and herbicides, applied by a licensed professional, shall only be used as approved by the Project Biologist. C. Pest Control: 1. Insect infestations and plant diseases will be monitored by the Project Biologist and reported to the owner. The Contractor shall consult a licensed Pest Control Advisor for any extensive pest control measures. 2. Pesticide and herbicide use beyond that approved for weed eradication is strictly prohibited unless authorized by the Project Biologist. Biological control agents, such as insect predators, may be used at the discretion of the Project Biologist and as approved by the Owner. 3. Common pests and diseases that occur naturally in the environment and are not harmful to plants shall be identified as tolerated and no cultural treatments shall be allowed. D. Herbivory: The Contractor shall monitor for herbivory of plants and shall inform the Project Biologist within 24 hours of discovery, who shall then prescribe remedial actions. Any remedial actions, such as fencing, shall be provided at Owner's expense. 8 R:\CIP~PROJECTS~PW01 ~PW01 d)5\0105Maintagrmt.doc EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF WORK E. Leaf Drop and Organic Debris: Leaf and branch drop shall be retained unless specially required to be removed for brush management purposes as directed by the Project Biologist. F. Debris Removal: The Contractor shall remove and dispose off site all non-organic debris. Removal of trash and litter shall continue on a regular basis during the establishment maintenance period. Organic debris created from the weeding of annual grasses may be left on site if the Project Biologist determines that it will not affect the establishment of native seedlings. However, noxious weed debris shall be disposed of off-site to avoid further introduction of undesirable exotic seed or propagules. G. Erosion Control: 1. Throughout the project installation, establishment and long-term maintenance periods, the Contractor shall monitor for erosion within revegetation areas and shall prohibit gullies, rill and sheet erosion, bare soil areas and silt deposition from occurring. 2. The Project Biologist shall prescribe erosion control procedures, at the expense of the Owner, after evaluation of potential and existing erosion problems on a case-by-case basis. 3. Erosion control shall emphasize prevention. If needed, however, repair shall include redirection or dissipation of the water source and recontouring of soil, followed by seeding, mulching, or planting. In some cases, straw mulching (with weed-free straw) is sufficient to stabilize the soil. Strategically placed and secured hay bales or sand bags may be used to dissipate water sources. 4. If required, the Project Biologist shall prescribe seeding of eroded areas. The plant palette and installation treatments employed in the restoration program shall dictate species selection. The use of invasive exotic species for erosion control shall not be allowed. 5. Erosion control prescribed during the long term maintenance period will be the responsibility of the Owner. I. Replanting and Reseeding: 1. The Contractor shall procure replacement planting stock in advance to ensure that replacement of dead container plants shall not be delayed during the plant establishment and maintenance periods. Additional container plants shall be added if a bare spot of twenty-five square feet or greater exists in the revegetation area following 120 days after planting and if the Project Biologist determines it is necessary for erosion control purposes. 2. Any plants not achieving the success criteria of the CDFG and ACOE permits following the long term maintenance period shall be removed and replaced bythe Contractor. Plants shall be replaced in kind, as specified in the plant palettes, or with appropriate replacement species that have shown success in that specific area, as determined by the Project Biologist. Any species substitutions shall require the approval of the Project Biologist. 9 R:\CIP~PROJECTS~PW01 ~PW01-05\0105Maintagnnt.doc EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF WORK 3. If certain plant species are failing in an area, plant species substitutions might be needed to achieve a greater success rate. No substitutions shall be made unless the owner and the Project Biologist approve the species substitution to achieve a greater success rate. Approved plant substitutions shall consist of only native plant material, and only local native genetic stock shall be used. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FOR THE CREATION SITE DURING LONG-TERM MAINTENANCE PERIOD A. First Year Performance Standards: 1. Seeded Plants: Sixty (60) percent cover of native seeded species within 120 days after seeding. 2. Container Plants: Ninety (90) pement survival of all tree and shrub plantings. If 90 pement survival has not been achieved, replanting necessary to achieve this standard shall be performed 120 days after planting. 3. If pement survival has not been achieved, replanting in-kind and/or re-seeding may be required. 4. Listed exotic weed species shall account for less than five percent cover and no mature specimens shall be present. B. Second Year Performance Standards: 1. Seeded Plants: Coverage sufficient to prevent back erosion and flood damage, recommended at sixty-five (65) percent. 2. Container Plants: Ninety (90) percent survival of all tree plantings and eighty (80) percent survival of all shrub plantings. If the percent survival has not been achieved, any replanting necessary to achieve this standard shall be performed. If an acceptable growth rate in height has not been achieved, the Project Biologist may recommend additional remediation measures. 3. Achieve at least five percent natural recruitment of native plants (either at least five species present or five percent cover from volunteers). If this is not achieved, the Project Biologist may require remedial grading to divert more floodwater on site to promote natural recruitment or not re-seeding sparse cover areas. 4. Listed exotic weed species shall account for less than five percent cover and no mature specimens shall be present. C. Third Year Performance Standards: 1. Seeded Plants: Coverage sufficient to prevent bank erosion and flood damage, recommended at seventy (70) percent. 10 R:\CIP~PROJECTS~PW01 ~PW01-05\0105Maintag~mt.doc EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF WORK 2. Container Plants: Ninety (90) percent survival of all tree plantings and eighty (80) pement survival of all shrub plantings. Seventy (70) pement cover of all tree and shrub plantings including volunteers. Replanting shall be performed as necessary to achieve these standards. All one-gallon cottonwood plantings shall achieve a height of at least ten feet. All willow species (excluding Salix exigua) shall achieve a height of at least seven feet, and Salix exigua shall achieve a height of at least four feet. If the minimum heights are not met, the Project Biologist may recommend additional fedilizer. D. Fourth Year Performance Standards: 1. Seventy-five (75) percent coverage of hydroseeded groundcovers. 2. Container Plants: Ninety (90) percent survival of all tree plantings and eighty (80) percent survival of all shrub plantings. Seventy-five (75) percent cover of all tree and shrub plantings including volunteers. Replanting shall be performed as necessary to achieve these standards. All one-gallon cottonwood plantings shall achieve a height of at least 13 feet. All willow species (excluding Salix exigua) shall achieve a height of at least nine feet, and Salix exigua shall achieve a height of at least five feet. If the minimum heights are not met, the Project Biologist may recommend additional fertilizer. E. Fifth Year Performance Standards: 1. Seeded Plants: Eighty (80) percent coverage. 2. Container Plants: Ninety (90) percent survival of all tree plantings and eighty (80) percent survival of all shrub plantings. Eighty (80) percent cover of all tree and shrub plantings including volunteers. Replanting shall be performed as necessary to achieve these standards. All one-gallon cottonwood plantings shall achieve a height of at least 16 feet. All willow species (excluding Salix exigua) shall achieve a height of at least 11 feet, and Salix exigua shall achieve a height of at least six feet. If the minimum heights are not met, the Project Biologist may recommend additional fertilizer. 11 R:\CIP~PROJECTS~PW01 ~PW01-05\0105Maintagnnt.doc EXHIBIT B PAYMENT SCHEDULE MAINTENANCE OF THE Environmental Habitat Created within the Long Canyon Detention Basin PW01-05 Exhibit B Payment Schedule Construction Inspection $1,700.00 Maintenance Year 1 $9,140.00 Maintenance Year 2 $6,700.00 Maintenance Year 3 $5,400.00 Maintenance Year 4 $2,600.00 Maintenance Year 5 $600.00 Total: $26,140.00 12 R:\CIP~PROJECTS~P W01 ~PW01-05\0105 Maintagrmt.dec ITEM 10 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL ~'~//, ,..~"~ CITY ATTORNEY ~ DIRECTOR OF FINANCE.,..¢:~_ CITY MANAGER ~ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council /~,,~AWilliam G. Hughes. Acting Director of Public Works/City Engineer July,24 2001 Temecula Valley - La Serena Way Storm Drain, Stage 2, Project No. 7-0- 0315, Tract Map No. 23371-11 - Cooperative Agreement PREPARED BY: 1~7 Ronald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works --Gerald L. Alegria, Senior Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: Approve the Margarita Road - Temecula Valley - La Serena Way Storm Drain, Stage 2, Project No. 7-0-0315, Tract Map No. 23371-11- Cooperative Agreement with the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, the City of Temecula, and M.A. Temeku Hills Development LLC. Authorize the execution of such agreement in its final form by the Mayor, City Attorney, and City Clerk. BACKGROUND: Tract Map No. 23371-11 is located at the southwest corner of La Serena Way and Meadows Parkway, a portion of the Temeku Hills Development. As a condition of approval, the developer must construct certain flood control storm drain facilities in order to provide flood protection for this planned development. The required facilities to be constructed include approximately 450 lineal feet of underground concrete pipe as shown on Exhibit "A". Pursuant to the Cooperative Agreement, the developer will construct said facilities, and the County Flood Control District will assume ownership and maintenance responsibility of mainline storm drain improvements. Furthermore, in accordance with the cooperative agreement, County Flood Control District will review and approve all construction plans associated with the storm drain improvements, inspect the construction of the project (County and City Inspectors will have indirect contact with the contractor via District Inspectors), and accepts ownership and responsibility for the operation and maintenance of La Serena Way Storm Drain, Stage 2 after construction. Participation by the City includes the review and approval of plans and specifications prepared by the Developer, granting permission to the County Flood Control District to inspect, operate and maintain La Serena Way Storm Drain, Stage 2 within City rights of way, and acceptance of the operation and maintenance of all inlets and connector pipes located within City rights of way. 1 R:'~AGDRP~2001\O724~TR23371olICOOP.AGR.doc The City will accept and hold Faithful Performance and Labor and Material Bonds for the storm drain improvements. Following City Council adoption of the Cooperative Agreement, it will be sent to the County Flood Control District and County of Riverside Board of Supervisors for their approval. FISCAL IMPACT: None Attachments: 1. Location Map (Exhibit "A") 2. Cooperative Agreement (4 copies) 2 R:~,GDRPT~20OI~0724\TR23371-I I COOP.AGR.dcc 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 FLOOD ADDENDUM TO AGREEMENT This Addendum to the Agreement, by and between the RIVERSIDE COUNTY CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT, hereinafter called "DISTRICT", the CITY OF TEMECULA, hereinafter called "CITY" and M-A TEMEKU HILLS DEVELOPMENT LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, hereinafter called "DEVELOPER", is hereby made and entered into as follows: RECITALS A. On November 14, 1989 the DISTRICT, the COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, hereinafter called "COUNTY" and MARGARITA VILLAGE DEVELOPlvlENT COMPANY, a California Venture, by The Buie Corporation, a California corporation, hereinafter called "BUIE" entered into a certain Agreement, hereinafter the "AGREEMENT", under which as a condition of approval for Tract No. 23371, BUIE was to construct cer~aln flood control facilities; and to deposit funds with DISTRICT to cover the costs of plan review, construction inspection, and operation and maintenance of said facilities; and DISTRICT was to provide plan review and approval, construction inspection and to also operate and maintain said facilities; and B. On April 18, 1996, the United States Bankruptcy Court Central District of California pursuant to Case No. SB94-26832-MG, issued an order giving notice of the "Sale Order" entitled "Order Approving Debtor's Motion To Sell Real Property Free And Clear Of Liens And Interests; And Order Approving Mutual Release And Settlement Agreement." The Order provided for, among other things, the sale of certain real property owned by BUIE, together with a leasehold interest, for Tract Numbers 23371-1, 23371-2, 23371-3, 23371-4 and 23371-5 to McMillin Project Services, Inc., or its assignee, all on the terms, covenants and conditions set forth in the Sale Order. McMillin then named Temeku Hills Development Partners, L.P., (TEMEKU) a California limited partnership as its assignee and the party to which -1- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 title to the Real Property was to be conveyed. On March 19, 1999, TEMEKU merged and became M-A Temeku Hills Development LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; and C. CITY incorporated on December 1, 1989 and therefore by operation of law, CITY is the successor of the obligations and commitments of COUNTY; and D. The parties hereto desire to enter into this Addendum to AGREEMENT in order to provide for the construction, operation and maintenance of approximately 450 lineal feet of additional underground concrete pipe, as shown in concept in blue on Exhibit "A",-page 2 of 2, attached hereto and made a part hereof. Hereinafter the additional underground concrete pipe is included in and added to "STORM DRAINS"; and E. On August 16, 1999, DEVELOPER obtained an Entry Permit from the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, hereinafter "MWD", for constructing a portion of STORM DRAINS on MWD property; and F. DISTRICT, DEVELOPER and LENNAR LAND PARTNERS II, a Florida general partnership, hereinafter called "LENNAR" executed a Right of Entry and Inspection Agreement on August 17, 1999 for construction of the additional 450 lineal feet of STORM DRAINS by DEVELOPER, and construction of La Serena Way Storm Drain Stage 3 by LENNAR. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises, and mutual covenants and conditions hereinafter set forth, said AGREEMENT executed on November 14, 1989, is hereby amended as follows: 1. Paragraph "B" of the AGREEMENT RECITALS is changed to read: B. The required facilities include two underground concrete pipe storm drain systems, hereinafter called "STORM DRAINS", as shown in red -2- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 and in blue on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof; and 2. Exhibit "A", page 2 of 2, attached hereto is hereby added to Exhibit "A" of the AGREEMENT. 3. Exhibit "B", page 5 of 5 attached hereto and by reference incorporated herein is hereby added to Exhibit "B" of the AGREEMENT. Except to the extent specifically added to, modified or amended hereunder, all of the terms, covenants and conditions of AGREEMENT dated November 14, 1989, shall remain in full force and effect between the parties hereto. // // 1N WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Addendum to Agreement on (to be filled in by Clerk of the Board) RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: By DAVID P. ZAPPE General Manager-Chef Engineer APPROVED AS TO FORM: WILLIAM C. KATZENSTEIN County Counsel JOE S. RAI~K' Assistant County Counsel Dated '~ [! ~- 10 I RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT By. JAMES A. VENABLE Chairman Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Board of Supervisors ATTEST: GERALD A. MALONEY Clerk of the Board By Deputy (SEAL) -3- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RECOMME]NI~ED FOR APPROVAL: By~_d& WILLIAM HUGHES Public Works Director APPROVED AS TO FORM: By PETER M. THORSON, City Attorney AAM:DVA:mcv PC\60141 02/28/2001 CITY OF TEMECULA By SHAWN D. NELSON, City Manager ATTEST: By. SUSAN W. JONES, CMC/AAE, City Clerk M-A TEMEKU HILLS DEVELOPMENT LLC, a Delaware limited liability company By: McMILLIN-AMERICAN LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Its Managing Member By: McMILLIN-COMPANIES, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company Its Managing Member Title ,._~m,~ot~ ~,'. /9. -4- EXHIBIT "A" 2OF2 EXHIBIT "B" 5OF5 :ALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of California County of ~ personally appeared'~-~ 0 ¥~'.-, ~ersonally known to me [] proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence (~ ~"*-: ,~NOTARY PUBLIC-CALIFORNIA · :"~-'&-~ SAN DIEGO COUNTY to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/hedtheir authorized capacity(les), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. Place Notary Seal Above WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature'of Notary Public OPTIONAL Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. Description of Attached Document.. Title or Type of Document: t~/~[. I ~,~/~/,_ ~....~. T~a?,~O"7'/ Document Date; Number of Pages: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Capacity(les) Claimed by Signer Signer's Name: [] Individual [] Corporate Officer -- Title(s): [] Partner-- [] Limited [] General [] Attorney in Fact [] Trustee [] Guardian or Conservator [] Other: Signer is Representing: Top of thumb here ITEM 11 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANCE~_. CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City ManagedCity Council "~William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer July 24, 2001 Tract Map No. 23143-5, now in conformance with its original approval, Located South of Pauba Road, East of Butterfield Stage Road, and North of De Portola Road PREPARED BY: Ronald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works Ward B. Maxwell, Associate Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Approve Tract Map No. 23143-5 Approve the Subdivision Monument Agreement and accept the Monument cash deposit as security for the agreements. BACKGROUND: Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23143-5 was originally approved by the Riverside County Board of Supervisors on August 16, 1988. The map has been extended five times. The Planning Director approved the Second Extension of Time on July 16, 1992, the Third Extension of Time on September 17, 1998, and the Fourth Extension of Time on September 13, 2000. The Fifth and final extension of time was approved on February 15, 2001 by the Planning Director, expiration date being August 18, 2001. The Developer has met all of the Conditions of Approval. This final map is in conformance with the approved tentative map. The approval of a final subdivision map, which substantially complies with the previously approved tentative map is a mandatory ministerial act under State law. Final Tract Map No. 23143-5 is a nineteen-acre property with a school site, park site, and open space area. The tract is located South of Pauba Road, East of Butterfield Stage Road, and North of De Portola Road. The site is currently undeveloped. Old Kent Road runs along the northwesterly portion of Tract Map No. 23143-5. A separate bond for the construction of Old Kent Road in the amount of $194,000.00 has been posted as security for street, drainage, and water improvements. This Bond was accepted during the April 26, 2001 council meeting associated with the park improvement requirements within the Crowne Hill Development. A separate cash deposit for the street and map monumentation in the amount of $5,125.00 has been posted. These bonds will not be released until all improvements and monumentation have been accepted. The following fees have been deferred for Tract Map No. 23143-5: Riverside County Flood Control District (ADP) Fee due prior to issuance of Building Permit. Development Impact Fee due prior to issuance of Occupancy. 1 r:~agdrpt~O01 \0724~23143-5 FISCAL IMPACT: None ATrACHMENTS: 2. 3. 4. Development Fee Checklist Fees & Securities Report Project Vicinity Map Tract Map No. 23143-5 2 r:~agdrpt~001\0724~3143-5 CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT TRACT MAP NO. 23143-5 DATE: July 17, 2001 IMPROVEMENTS FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE MATERIAL & LABOR MONUMENT SECURITY SECURITY SECURITY Streetand Drainage $ 155,500 $ 77,750 Water $ 38,500 $ 19,250 Sewer $ N/A $ N/A TOTAL $ 194,000 $ 97,000 $ 5,125 DEVELOPMENT FEES City Traffic Signing and Striping Costs RCFCD (ADP) Fee Development Impact Fee SERVICE FEES Planning Fee Comprehensive Transportation Plan Plan Check Fee Monument Inspection Fee Fees Paid to Date Balance of Fees Due *To Be Determined. * To be paid prior to Building Permit ** To be paid prior to Occupancy $ 0.00 $ TBD* $ TBD** $ 104.00 $ 8.00 $ 810.00 $ 256.25 $ 1178.25 $ o 3 r:~.gd rpt~001~0724~3143-5 eE~ E~ 'ON 1:~¥~1 Z I,I 909~"?'~7240 R.B.F, '~ p'~d JUL ,tg ',~.L CITY OF TEMECULA SUBDIVISION MONUMENT AGREEMENT DATE OF AGREEMENT: NAM.EOF SUBDIVII)ER: ~__~.~.~,~C (referrext to as "SUBDIVIDER") (referrexi to as .SUBDIVISION") TP,.ACT NO.: TENTATIVE MAP P,.ESOLUTION OF APPROVAL NO,: (referred to ~s "Resolution of Approval") ESTIMATED TOTAL COST OF IMPROVEMENTS: ESTI1MATED TOTAL COST OF MONUMENTATION: COMPLETION DATE: ] - c5 / -~J 3 NAME OF SURETY AND BOND NO. FOR SUBDIVISION MONUlViENT BOND: SUBDIV~$10N ~ONUMI~NT A~RE~VL~NT This agreement is made and entered into by and between the City ofTemecula, Ca.~ifomia, a Municipal Corporation of the State of California, hercinaher referred to as CITY, and the SD'BDIMrlDER. P~CrrALS SUBDIVID~has presented to CITY for approval and recordation, a ritual subdivision map of a proposed subdivision pursuant to provisions of thc Subdivision Ivl~p Act of tho 8Uat¢ of California and the CITY ordinances and regulations relating to th~ ~ling, approval and recordation of subdivision maps. The Subdivision Map Act and tha CITY ordinmccs and r,gulations relating to the filing, approval and recordation of subdivision amps are collect/rely referred to in this agreement as the "Subdivision Laws". A tentative map of the SUBDMSION has been approved, subject to frae Subdivision Laws and to the requkements and conditions contained in the Resolution of Approval. The Resolution of Approval is on file in the Office of the City Clerk and is imcorporated into this agreement by reference. Thc Subdivision Laws establish as a condition precedent to the appr0v~al of a final map that sUBDIVIDER must have complied with the Resolution of Approval and must have either (a) completed, in compliance with CITY standards, all of the impr<>vemants and land development work required by the Subdivision Laws and the Rcsolutioaa of Approml or, ('b) have entered into a secured agreement with CITY ~o complete the improvements md land development within a period of time specified by CITY. In consideration of approval of a final map for the SUBDFVISION by the City Cotmoil, SUBDIVIDER desires to enter into this agreement, wher,by SUBDrVIDER promises to install and complete, at SUBDIVIDER'S own expense, all monumentati~a required in cormcotion with the proposed subdivision. SUBDIVIDER. hz ~ecuco:l this agreement by improvement security required by the Subdivision Law~ and approved 'by the City Attorney. For the purpose of this agreement, the only improvements that remain to be completed for this unit is installation of thc subdivision monumentation, md Aimprovemauts as usedthroughom this agreement implies said monumental/on. An estimate of the cost of the Subdivision Monumentation, has been m~ade and have been approved by the Cit? Engineer. The estimated amount is stated on Page 1 of this agreement. The basis for the estimate is attached as Exhibit "A" TO this agreement. SUBDIVIDER recognizes that by approval of the Mal map for SUBDMSION, CITY has conferred substantial fights upon SUBDIVIDER, melucling the right to ~eI1, lease, or finance lots within the SUBDMSION, and has taken the final act necessm3, to s~bdivide the property within the SUBDIVISION. As a result, CITY will be damaged to th,'- extent of the cost of installation of the improvements by SUBDIVIDER'S failure to perfoma it~ obligations under this agreement, including, but not limited to, SUBDIVIDER*S obligation to complete installation of the Subdivision Monamentation by the time established in this agreement. CITY shall be entitled to all remedies available to it pursuant to ~is agreement md the Subdivision Laws in the event ora default by SUBDIVIDER. It is specifically recognized that the detem'dnation of whether a reversion to acreage or rescission of the SUBDIVISION constitutes an adequate remedy for default by the SU'BDIVIDF.[R shall be within the sole discretion of CITY. 90~6767240 R.B.F. ?20 P~4 JUL lB '01 13:15 SUBDIVISION MONUMENT AGI~£M'ENT NOW, TI-IER_EFORE, in considerafion of the spproval and recordation by lhe City Council of the final map of thc SUBDMSION, SUBDIVIDER and CITY agree ~s follows; 1. SU]~IDJVII)ER'S Ob[i.gations tO Construct Ir~rovcments- SUBDIVIDIER shall: a. Install all SUBDMSION monuments required by ]aw within etighteen (18) months of the date ofthi~ agreement, Nothing in this Section 1 shall be construed as authorizing or granting an ex'tension oft/me to SUBDIVIDEtC ~ SUBDIVIDER shill at all times guarantee SUBDIVIDER'S performance of this agreement by furnishing to CITY, and maintaining, good and sufficient security as required by the Subdivision Laws on forms approved by CITY for the purposes amd in the amounts as follows: Good and sufficient security in the amount o.f 100% of the estimated cost of setting subdivision monuments as stated preViOUSly in this agreement. The securities required by this agreement shall be kept on file with the City Clerk. The xerms &the s~curity documentS referenced on Page 1 of this agreement are incorporated into this agreement by this reference. If any security is replaced by another approved security, the replaeemem shall be filed w/tin the City Clerk and, upon filing, shall be deemed to have been made apart of and incorporated into this agreement. Upon filing of a replacement security with the City Clerk, the former security may be released. 3. InSpection. SUBDIVIDER shall at all times maintain proper facilities and safe access for inspection of the monumentation by CITY inspecaor. Upon completion of the work the SUBDIVIDER my request a final inspection by the City Engineer, or the City Engineer's authorized representative. If the City Engineer, or the designated representative, determine that the work has been completed in accordance with this agreement, then the City Engineer shall certify the completion of the monumentation to the City Council- SUBDIVIDER shall bear all costs of inspection and certification. 4. Release of Securities. Subject to approval by the City Council of CITY, the securities ~-equired by this agreement shall be released as follows: a. Security given for installation of the Subdivision Monuments.rich shall be released upon the final completion and acceptance of the act or work. 5. .Injury to Public Improv_,,~ne~tx, ]public PmnelW or Public Utilities Facilities. SUBDIVIDER shall replace or have replaced, or repair or have repaired, as the c.ase may be, all public improvements, public utilities facilities and surveying or subdivision monuments which arc destroyed or damaged as a result of any work under this agreement. SUBDIVIDER shall bear the entire cost of replacement or repairs of any and all public or public utility property damaged or destroyed by reason of any work done under this agreement, whether such property is owned by the United States or any agency thereof, or tho State of Cahfomia, or any agency or political subdiVision thereof, or by the CITY or any px~blic or private utility corporation or by any combination of such owners. Any repair or repl~cement shall be m the satisfaction, and subject to the approval, of the City Engineer. 909~767~40 R.B. F~ ?~ p~ JUL lJ ' ~1 l J: iJ SUBDIVISION MONUM.~.NT ACREEMI~NT , 6. Pc----~ts' SL~BDIVIDER shall, at s~D~ER'S ~xpens~, ob~n all p~u~ats ~d licenses for ~e ~ns~on ~d in~Mlafion of the improvements, ~ve all necessa~ notices and pay all fees and t~cs required by law. Def~.ull of S~.YBDIVIDER. Default of SUBDIVIDER shal! include, but not be hraited to, SUBD1VIDER'S failure to timely commence consl~uetion of this agreement; SUBDIVIDER'S failure to timely ccmple~;e installation of the monumentation. SUBDIVIDER'S insolvency, appointment cfa receiver, or the filing of any petition in bankruptcy either voluntary or involuntary which SUBDI'VIE)ER fails to discharge within thi;ty (30) days; the corFu~eneem~t of a foreelosurc~ action against the S~,FBDIVISION or a portion thereof, or any conveyance in lieu or in avoiflanee of foreclosure; or $1.YBDIVIDER'S failure to perform any other obligation under this agreement. The CITY reserves to itsetf all remedies available to it at law or in equity for breach of SUBDiVIDEK'S obligations under this agreement. 'lhe CTTY shall have the right, subject to this section, to draw upon or utilize the appropnat~ security to mitigate CITY damages in event of default by SUBDIVIDER- The right of CITY to draw upon or utilize the security is additional to and nol in lieu of any other remedy available to CITY. It is specifically recognized that the estimated costS and security amounl.~ may not reflect the actual cost of installation of the improvemunt~ and, therefore, CITY damages for SUBDI~rIDEK'S default shall b~ measured by thc cost of completing the required nnprovementS. The surr~ provided by the improvement security may be used by CITY for the completion of the public improvements in accordance w~th the final map and specifications eonlained b. ercin. In the event of SUBDIV1DER'S default under this agreement, SUBDIVIDER authorizes CITY to perform such obligation twenty days after nxailing written notice of default to SUBDI~ER and to SUBDIVIDER'S Surety, and agrees to pay the entire cost of such peribrmance by CITY. CITY may take over the work ~nd prosecute the same to completion, by contract or by any other method CITY may deem advisable, for the account and at the expense of gUBDIVIDEK, and SUBDIVIDER'S Surety shall be liable to CITY for an)' excess cost or damages occasioned CITY thereby; and, in such event, CITY, without liability for so doing, may take possession of, and utilize in completing the work, such matehals, appliances, plant and other property belonging to SUBDIVIDER as may be on the site of the work and necessary for performance of the work, Failure of SUBDIVIDER to comply with the terms of this ag-reement shall constitute consent to the filing by CITY of a notice of violauon againsl all the Iota in the SUBDIVISION, or to ~eseind the approval or otherwise rev~.'ta the sUBDIVISION to acreage. The remedyprovided by this Subsection c is in addition to and not in lieu of other remedies available to CITY. SUBDIVIDER agrees that the choice of remedy or remedies for SUBDIVIDER'S breach shall be in the discretion of C1TY. In the ~vent that sUBDIVIDER fails to perform any obligation hereundeT, SUBDIVIDER agrees to pay sfi costs and expenses incurred by CITY in securing performance of such obligationS, including costs of suit a.r~d reasonable attorney's SI. IBDIVISION MONUMENT AGREEMENT 10. 11. 12. 13. g. The failure of CITY to take an enforcement action with re.erSt to a default, or to declare a breach, shall not be construed as a waiver of that default or breach or any subsequent default or breach of SUBDIVIDER. SUBDIVEDER Not Agent of CITY. Neither SUBDIVIDER nor any ef SLIBDIV[DER'S agents or contractors are or shall be considered to be agents ofCl Y in connection with thc performance of SI.~3DIVIDER'S obligations under this agreement. Ini.u._ry to Work. Umil such time as the improvements are accepted by C 1TY, SUBDIVIDER shall be responsible for and bear the risk of loss to any of the installed improvements. Llntil such ti me as all improvements required by this agreement are fully completed and accepted by CITY, SIH3DIVIDER will be responsible for the care, maintenance of, and any damage to such improvement. CITY shall not, nor shall any officer or employee thereof, be liable or responsible lbr any accident, loss or damage, regardless of cause, happening or occarring to the work or improvements specified in this agreement prior to the completion and acccptmacc of the work or improvements, Ali such risks shall be the responsibility of and are hereby assumed by SUBDIVIDER, Otb. er Agreements, Nothing contained in this agreement shall preclude <:ITY from expending monies pursuant to agreements concurrently or previously executed between the pm-ties, or from entenng into agreements with other subdividers for the apportionxnent of costs of water arid sewer mains, or other improvements, pursuant to the prOViSions t~f the CITY ordinance providing therefore, nor shall anything in this agreement commit ClTY of any .~uch apportionment. F~inal Ag,e_entance of Work~. Acceptance of the work on behalf of CIT'~ shall be made by City Council upon recommendation of the City Engineer afl.er final compl~mion and inspection of all monamentation. The City Council shall act upon the Enl~neer's rc:cnmmcndation within thirty (30) day~ from the date the City Engineer certifies that the 'work has been finally ct~mpleted, as provided in Paragraph 3. lnde~_nn!ty/Hold Harmless. CITY or any officer or employee thereof shall not be liable any injury to persons or property occasioned by reason of the acts or omissitms of SLIBDIVIDER, its agents or employees in the performance of this agreement. SLIBDIV [DER further agrees lo protect and hold harmless CITY, its officials and employees from any and all claims, demands, causes or action, liability or loss of any sort, because of, or arising om of, acts or omissions of SUBDIVIDER, its agents or employees in the perfunnance of this agreement, including all claim~, demands, causes of action, liability, or loss because of, or arising out of, in whole or in part, the installatiOn or review of the improvemencq- Provisions oft}lis paragraph shall remain in full force and effect for ten years f~allowing the acceptance by the CITY of improvements- It is the intent of this section that SUBDIVI'DER shall bc responsible for all liabili~ for installation and inspection of the improvements installed or work done pursuant to this agreement and that CITY shall not bc liable for any negligence, nonfeasance, misfmsance or malfeasance in approving reviewing, checking, or corr~eung any map or specifications or in appromng, reviewing or inspecting any work or construction. The improvement security shall not be required to cover the provisions of this paragraph: Sa)e or Disposition of SUBDI'V'ISION~;. Sale or other disposition of thi~ property will not relieve SUBDIVIDER from the obligations set forth herein. If SIlBDIVIDER sells the properly or any por~ion of the property within the SIJBDIVISIONI to any other person, the SUBDIVIDER may request a novation of this agreement and a subslilution of security. Upon ~UB~]VI$1ON MONUM~31~qT ~(~RE~M!~NT 18. ~ The provisions o£this agreement are severable. ~f ~.ny po~on of this agreement is held invalid by a court of eompeten~ jurisdiction, the remainder of the agreement shall remain in full force and effect unless amended or modified by the mutual eonsem of the parties. 19. Captions___~. The captions of this agreement are for convenience and refer~mce only and shall not define, explain, modify, bruit, exemplify, or aid in the interpretation, construction or meaning of any provisions of this agreement. 20. Litigation or A~'bitration. In the event that suit or arbitration is brought to enforce the terms of this conUaet, lhe prevailing party shall be entitled to litigation costs and r~asonable attorneys' fees. 21. Incorporation of Re~i~]s, The Recitals to this agreement are hereby incorporated into the terms of this agreement, 22. l~nfire~Agreement This agreement constitutes the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the subject matter. All modifications, amendments, or waivers of the terms of this agreement must be in writing and signed by the appropriate representatives oft.he pm'ties. In the ease of the CITY, the appropriate party shall be the City Manager. SUBDIVISION MONUMENT AGREEMENT approval of the novation and substitution of securities, the SUBDINIIDER may request a release or reduction of the securities required by this agreement. Nothing in the novation shall reheve the SUBDIVIDER of the obligations under Paragraph 17 for the work or improvement done by SUBDIVIDER. 14. Time of the Essence. Time is of the essence of this agreement. 15. Time for Completion of Work/Time Extensions. SUBDIVIDER shall complete conslruction of the improvements required by this agreement within eighteen (18) months of this agreement. In the event good cause exists as determined by the City Eragineer, the time for completion of the improvements hereunder may be extended. The extensSon shall be made by writing executed by the City Engineer. Any such extension may be granted without notice to SUBDIVIDER's Surety and shall not affect the validity of this agreement or release the Surety or Sureties on any security given for this agreement. The City Engineer ~hall be the sole and final judge as to whether or not good cause has been shown to entitle ~LrBDIVIDER to an extension. Delay, other than delay in the commencement of work, resulting from an act of CITY, or by an act of God, which SUBDIVIDER could not have reasoraable foreseen, or by storm or inclement weather which prevent the conducting of work, and wlaich were not caused by or contributed to by SUBDIVIDER, shall constitute good cause for an extension of the time for completion. As a condition of such extension, the City Eragineer may require SUBDIVIDER to furnish new security guaranteeing performance of this agreement as extended in an increased amount as necessary to compensate for any in¢lease in cons~uction costs as deterrmned by the City Engineer. 16. No Vesting of Rights. Performance by SUBDIVIDER of this agreement shall not be construed to vest SUBDIVIDER'S fights with respect to any change in amy zoning or building law or ordinance. 17. Notices. All notices required or provided for under this agreement shall be in writing and delivered in person or sent by mail, postage prepaid and addressed as provided in this Section. Notice shall be effective on the date it is delivered in person, or, if rraailed, on the date of deposit in the United States Mail. Notices shall be addressed as follows unless a written change of address is filed with the City: Notice to CITY: William G. Hughes, Director of Public Worlds/City Engineer City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Notice to SUBDIVIDER: 6 SUBDrV1SIqN MONUMENT AGREEMENT IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this agr¢om~nt is exocut6d by CITY, by and througi~ its Mayor. SUBDMDER__ ~ Z- ~, ~,/-~7-z~ CITY OF TEMECULA B. ~La~o ~ ~y: ..... Jeff Comerchero, Mayor' Ti.e: ~ ?z~,,; ~ "~ ,~e ,,a_,~ e,-,~,~ ~- By: Name: Title: (Proper Notarization of SUBDIVIDER's signature is r~quired and shall be attached) RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: William O. Hu~hcs, Direc. tor of Publ~e Worl~lCtty Engineer APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: P~ter M. Thorson, 6"/ty AttornO: ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerl~ CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of Ca lifo, rNa Countyo, _~!V~ personally appeared Place Noim7 Seal Above [] proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(¢ whose name(~ is/a)~ subscribed to th~~ within instrumebt and acknowledged to me ~hat ~/she/th~ executed the same in h~her/th~ authorized capacity(i~, and that ~ ~/her/th~ signature(~n the instrument the pe/~son~,~r the entity upon behalf of which the person~ acted, executed the instrument. OPTIONAL Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. Descripti°n of Attached Dd~;~rr)e~/'~/' / * '"'~ ~' '^ ~ % Title or Type of Document: ~, J)~[ J(/t L¥ [~_! L)[! ///~(//~;¢¢"~_',~'J{'- Document Date: "'~ ~( ('~ Number of Pages: ~ Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Capacity(les) Claimed by Signer Signer's Name: [] Individual [] Corporate Officer -- Title(s): [] Partner-- E] Limited [] General [] Attorney in Fact [] Trustee [] Guardian or Conservator [] Other: Signer Is Representing: Top of thumb here © 1997 National Notary Asscciation - 9350 De Soto Ave., P.O. Box 2402 · Chatsworth, CA 91313-2402 Prod No. 5907 Reorder: Call Toll-Free 1~00-876~827 ITEM 12 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY ~ I DIRECTOR OF FINANCE ~ I CITY MANAGER ~ I CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City ManagedCity Council William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer July 24, 2001 State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) Discretionary Fund Application - Cherry Street Southbound Off Ramp Improvement Project PREPARED BY: Beryl Yasinosky, Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: Receive and file this report regarding our 2002 State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) Discretionary Fund application for the Cherry Street Southbound Off Ramp Improvement Project and authorize the Director of Public Works to forward said application to the Riverside County Transportation Commission. 2. Adopt a Resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2001- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA SUPPORTING THE APPLICATION TO THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION FOR 2002 STATE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DISCRETIONARY FUNDS FOR THE CHERRY STREET SOUTHBOUND OFF RAMP IMPROVEMENT PROJECT BACKGROUND: The State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) is a multi-year capital improvement program of transportation projects on and off the state highway system, funded with revenues from the State Highway Account and other funding sources. Last month, the Riverside County Transportation Commission approved the release of a Call for Projects to be funded by 2002 STIP dollars. The Public Works Department has prepared a grant application request that we believe meets the goals of the STIP funding program. Our grant application seeks $750,000.00 in STIP funds to construct a new off ramp that will allow southbound traffic to exit Interstate 15 directly onto Jefferson Avenue, north of Winchester Road. The Cherry Street Southbound Off Ramp Improvement Project would be the first phase of the ultimate interchange improvements and ramp modifications associated with the future Date/Cherry Street Interchange and the existing Winchester Road Interchange. The project will also include the construction of curb and gutters, pavement, sidewalks and a new traffic signal at Jefferson Avenue. R:\agdrpt\01\0724\STIP2002.grantsupport 1 If our grant application is successful, the Cherry Street Southbound Off Ramp Improvement Project will facilitate cooperative efforts between the City of Temecula, Caltrans and the City of Murrieta to reduce traffic congestion, enhance safety conditions and provide access and infrastructure improvements necessary to support future development along Jefferson Road and the 1-15 corridor. FISCAL IMPACT: The City of Temecula has identified the proposed Cherry Street Southbound Off Ramp Project improvements within it five-year capital improvement program for FY 2002-2006. Development Impact Fees and Capital Project Reserves in the amount of $3.9 million have been identified to fund the cost of administration, design and construction of this project. If our STIP grant application is successful, $750,000.00 in capital reserve funds could be used for the remaining project phases associated with the long-term interchange improvements and ramp modifications proposed in this area. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution No. 2001- 2. SiteNicinity Map R:\agdrpt\01\0724\STIP2002.grantsupport 2 RESOLUTION NO. 2001- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA SUPPORTING THE APPLICATION TO THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION FOR 2002 STATE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DISCRETIONARY FUNDS FOR THE CHERRY STREET SOUTHBOUND OFF RAMP IMPROVEMENT PROJECT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) is a multi-year capital improvement program of transportation projects on and off the state highway system, funded with revenues from the State Highway Account and other funding sources; and Section 2. Approximately $18 million in STIP funds is estimated to be available for jurisdictions having eligible transportation projects within Riverside County; and Section 3. The existing southbound off ramp at Winchester Road does not adequately handle current traffic levels, nor will it acceptably serve future demands; and Section 4. The proposed Cherry Street Southbound Off Ramp Improvement Project represents the first phase of ultimate interchange improvements and ramp modifications planned in the area; and Section5. The construction of the Cherry Street Southbound Off Ramp Improvement Project will provide significant safety and operational improvements for southbound traffic exiting Interstate 15, and promote economic viability along Jefferson Avenue and the Interstate 15 corridor; and Section 6. The Cherry Street Southbound Off Ramp Improvement Project is estimated to cost $3.9 million. Development Impact Fees and Capital Project reserves reduce the City's STIP funding request to $750,000.00; and Section 7. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby endorses and supports the application to the Riverside County Transportation Commission for the construction of the Cherry Street Southbound Off Ramp Improvement Project to relieve traffic congestion, enhance safety conditions and provide improved access and infrastructure to support economic development along Jefferson Avenue and the 1-15 corridor. Section 8. Resolution. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 24~ day of July 2001. Jeff Comerchero, Mayor R:~agdrpt\01\0724\STIP2002.grantsupport 3 ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk (SEAL) STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 2001- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 24th day of July, 2001 by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS Susan Jones, CMC City Clerk R:\agdrpt\01\0724\STIP2002.g rantsupport 4 ITEM 13 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City ManagedCity Council ~fl/_.)/~,William G. Hughes, July 24, 2001 APPROVAL~'~,,~"'-" CITYATTORNEY DIRECTOROFFINANCE~ CITY MANAGER Director of Public Works/City Engineer Professional Services Agreement - EDAW. Inc. Biological Observations & Monitoring - Long Canyon Detention Basin Project No. PW01-05 PREPARED BY: Greg Butler, Senior Engineer- Capital Projects RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve a five (5) year Professional Services Agreement with EDAW, Inc. for a total not to exceed amount of $58,539.00 and authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement. BACKGROUND: In October of 1999, the City entered into an agreement with Woodside Homes to accept the 5-year maintenance and monitoring requirements of the Long Canyon Detention Basin environmental mitigation area. The mitigation area was set up to satisflj the conditions of the Army Corp of Engineers permit issued for the Campos Verdes Development. The City does not have a staff biologist to complete the necessary monitoring, plant surveys and reporting to the Army Corp. Therefore RFP102 was issued to solicit proposals from qualified Environmental/Biological consultants. Of the five (5) consultants solicited, EDAW was the only firm to respond to the City's RFP. EDAW, formerly KEA Environmental, has done similar work for the City relating to the Pala Road Bridge Replacement project. The negotiated fee is consistent with the amounts charged for the Pala Road Bridge Project. Because Woodside Homes will begin work on the environmental mitigation site mid July 2001 there is insufficient time to solicit additional proposals. Because the Army Corp permit requires the mitigation site to be monitored for a period of 5-years, EDAW has prepared cost estimates to complete the entire 5-year monitoring obligation. The total cost has been broken down to the cost for the construction period and then costs for each of the 5- years required by permit. This initial contract will cover the biological observation work necessary for the actual construction of the mitigation site as well as the first year's monitoring and reporting. Amendments to this original contract will be brought to council annually for the remaining four years. The total cost of the necessary biological monitoring and reporting to the Army Corp. over the 5 year period will be $58,538.00. FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate funds are available in the Public Works FY2001-2002 Operating Budget in Account, No. 001-164-601-5275 for the first year of this agreement in the amount of $18,246.00. Subsequent fiscal appropriations will be necessary for each of the following four (4) years. ATTACHMENT: Agreement 1 R:~AGDRPT~2001\0724\EDAW Long Cyn Agree. DOC CITY OF TEMECULA PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR BIOLOGICAL OBSERVATIONS & MONITORING LONG CANYON DETENTION BASIN THIS AGREEMENT, is made and effective as of July 24, 2001, between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation ("City") and EDAW, Inc., ("Consultant"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. TERM. This Agreement shall commence on July 24, 2001, and shall remain and continue in effect until June 30, 2007, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. 2. SERVICES. Consultant shall perform the services and tasks described and set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. Consultant shall complete the tasks according to the schedule of performance which is also set forth in Exhibit A. 3. PERFORMANCE. Consultant shall at all times faithfully, competently and to the best of his or her ability, experience, and talent, perform all tasks described herein. Consultant shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of Consultant hereunder in meeting its obligations under this Agreement. 4. PREVAILING WAGES. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contractor from the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. These rates are on file with the City Clerk. Copies may be obtained at cost at the City Clerk's office of Temecula. Consultant shall provide a copy of prevailing wage rates to any staff or sub-contractor hired, and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. Consultant shall comply with the provisions of Sections 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code. Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, Consultant shall forfeit to the City, as a penalty, the sum of $25.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for anywork done under this contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of the Contract. 5. PAYMENT. a. The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and terms and the schedule of payment as set forth in Exhibit A, Payment Rates and Schedule, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. Any terms in Exhibit A other than the payment rates and schedule of payment are null and void. This amount shall not exceed Fifty Eight Thousand Five Hundred Thirty Eight Dollars and No Cents ($58,538.00) for the total term of the Agreement unless additional payment is approved as provided in this Agreement. I r:~a_qrrnr~MISCAGRMT~EDAW Lon~ Canyon a{:ln-nt b. Consultant shall not be compensated for any services rendered in connection with its performance of this Agreement which am in addition to those set forth herein, unless such additional services are authorized in advance and in writing bythe City Manager. Consultant shall be compensated for any additional services in the amounts and in the manner as agreed to by City Manager and Consultant at the time City's wdtten authorization is given to Consultant for the performance of said services. The City Manager may approve additional work not to exceed ten percent (10%) of the amount of the Agreement, but in no event shall such sum (basic agreement amount and contingency amount) exceed twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000.00). c. Consultant will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed. Invoices shall be submitted between the first and fifteenth business day of each month, for services provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice as to all non-disputed fees. If the City disputes any of consultant's fees it shall give written notice to Consultant within 30 days of receipt of a invoice of any disputed fees set forth on the invoice. 6. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT WITHOUT CAUSE. a. The City may at any time, for any mason, with or without cause, suspend or terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the consultant at least ten (10) days prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Consultant shall immediately cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City suspends or terminates a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement. b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the City shall pay to Consultant the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination, provided that the work performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the Agreement pursuant to this Section, the Consultant will submit an invoice to the City pursuant to Section 4. 7. DEFAULT OF CONSULTANT. a. The Consultant's failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall constitute a default. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under the terms of this Agreement, City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by written notice to the Consultant. If such failure by the Consultant to make progress in the performance of work hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Consultant's control, and without fault or negligence of the Consultant, it shall not be considered a default. b. If the City Manager or his delegate determines that the Consultant is in default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the Consultant with written notice of the default. The Consultant shall have (10) days after service upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the Consultant fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement. r;,~aarrnt~41SCAGRMT~EDAW Lono Canyon aormt 8. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS. a. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to sales, costs, expenses, receipts and other such information required by City that relate to the performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain adequate records of services provided in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of services. All such records shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be clearly identified and readily accessible. Consultant shall provide free access to the representatives of City or its designees at reasonable times to such books and records, shall give City the right to examine and audit said books and records, shall permit City to make transcripts there from as necessary, and shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings and activities related to this Agreement. Such records, together with supporting documents, shall be maintained for a pedod of three (3) years after receipt of final payment. b. Upon completion of, or in the event of termination or suspension of this Agreement, all original documents, designs, drawings, maps, models, computer files containing data generated for the work, surveys, notes, and other documents prepared in the course of providing the services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission of the Consultant. With respect to computer files containing data generated for the work, Consultant shall make available to the City, upon reasonable written request by the City, the necessary computer software and hardware for purposes of accessing, compiling, transferring and printing computer files. c. With respect to the design of public improvements, the Consultant shall not be liable for any injuries or property damage resulting from the reuse of the design at a location other than that specified in Exhibit A without the wdtten consent of the Consultant. 9. INDEMNIFICATION. The Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, including attorney fees and expert witness fees, or liability of any kind or nature which the City, its officers, agents and employees may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of Consultant's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions arising out of or in any way related to the performance or non-performance of this Agreement, excepting only liability adsing out of the negligence of the City. 10. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS. Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, its agents, representatives, or employees. a. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as: (1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability form No. CG 00 01 11 85 or 88. (2) Insurance Services Office Business Auto Coverage form CA 00 01 06 92 covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto). If the Consultant owns no automobiles, a non-owned auto endorsement to the General Liability policy described above is acceptable. r:~arrnt\MI$CAGRM'r~EDAW Lena Canyon aorrnt (3) Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Employer's Liability Insurance. If the Consultant has no employees while performing under this Agreement, worker's compensation insurance is not required, but Consultant shall execute a declaration that it has no employees. (4) Professional Liability Insurance shall be written on a policy form providing professional liability for the Consultant's profession. b. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no less than: (1) General Liability: One million dollars $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. (2) Automobile Liability: One million dollars $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage. (3) Worker's Compensation as required by the State of California; Employer's Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury or disease. (4) Professional Liability coverage: Two million ($2,000,000) per claim and in aggregate. c. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City Manager. At the option of the City Manager, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers; or the Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense expenses. d. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions: (1) The City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities per[ormed by or on behalf of the Consultant; products and completed operations of the Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by the Consultant; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Consultant. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers. (2) For any claims related to this project, the Consultant's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insured maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute with it. (3) Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers. (4) The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. (5) Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days' prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the City. e. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. Self insurance shall not be considered to comply with these insurance requirements. f. Verification of Coveraqe. Consultant shall furnish the City with original endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be on forms provided by the City. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. As an alternative to the City's forms, the Consultant's insurer may provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements effecting the coverage required by these specifications. 11. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. a. Consultant is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Neither City nor any of its officers, employees, agents, or volunteers shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of Consultant's officers, employees, or agents except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. Consultant shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any manner. b. No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Consultant as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for performing services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder. 12. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES. The Consultant shall keep itself informed of all local, State and Federal ordinances, laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Consultant shall at all times observe and comply with all such ordinances, laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Consultant to comply with this section. 13. RELEASE OF INFORMATION. a. All information gained by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential and shall not be released by Consultant without City's prior written authorization. Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not without written authorization from the City Manager or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the work performed under this Agreement or relating to any project or property located within the City. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered "voluntary" provided Consultant gives City notice of such court order or subpoena. b. Consultant shall promptly notify City should Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed there under or with respect to any project or property located within the City. City retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Consultant and/or be present at any deposition, headng or similar proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Consultant. However, City's dght to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite said response. 14. NOTICES. Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (I) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice. Notice shall be effective upon delivery to the addresses specified below or on the third business day following deposit with the document delivery service or United States Mail as provided above. To City: City of Temecula Mailing Address: P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, California 92589-9033 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, California 92590 Attention: City Manager To Consultant: EDAW, Inc. 1420 Kettner Boulevard, Suite 620 San Diego, California 92101 Attention: Jack L. White, Vice Prasident/Principal 15. ASSIGNMENT. The Consultant shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of the City. Upon termination of this Agreement, Consultant's sole compensation shall be payment for actual services performed up to, and including, the date of termination or as may be otherwise agreed to in writing between the City Council and the Consultant. 16. LICENSES. At all times during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the services described in this Agreement. 17. GOVERNING LAW. The City and Consultant understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event such litigation is filed by one party against the other to enforce its rights under this Agreement, the prevailing party, as determined by the Court's judgment, shall be entitled to reasonable attomey fees and litigation expenses for the relief granted. 18. PROHIBITED INTEREST. No officer, or employee of the City of Temecula shall have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, the proceeds thereof, the Contractor, or Contractor's sub-contractors for this project, during his/her tenure or for one year thereafter. The Contractor hereby warrants and represents to the City that no officer or employee of the City of Temecula has any interest, whether contractual, non-contractual, financial or otherwise, in this transaction, or in the business of the Contractor or Contractor's sub-contractors on this project. Contractor further agrees to notify the City in the event any such interest is discovered whether or not such interest is prohibited by law or this Agreement. 19. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All pdor or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material. 20. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT. The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Consultant warrants and represents that he or she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Consultant and has the authority to bind Consultant to the performance of its obligations hereunder. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OFTEMECULA Jeff Comemhero, Mayor Attest: Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk Approved As to Form: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney CONSULTANT EDAW, Inc. 1420 KeEner Boulevard, Suite 620 San Diego, CA 92101 (619-) 233-1454 Jack L. White, Vice President/Principal By: Name: Title: (Signatures of two corporate officers required for Corporations) 8 r:~a~rmt'dvtlSCAGRMT~EDAW LonQ CanYon a(~rmt EXHIBIT A TASKS TO BE PERFORMED AND PAYMENT RATES AND SCHEDULE 9 r:~agrmt\MISCAGRM'r~EDAW Long Canyon agrmt EDAW INC 1420 KETTNER BOULEVARD SUITE 620 SAN OIEGO CALIFORNIA 92101 TEL 619 233 1454 FAX 619 233 0952 www.edaw.com UNITED STATES EUROPE AUSTRALIA ASIA June 26, 2001 Mr. Greg J. Buffer, P. E City of Temecula Department of Public Works 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, California 92590 Subject:. Environ.mental Monitoring for the Long Canyon Detention Basin- Submittal of Scope and Cost Proposal Dear Mr. Butler: In response to the City of Temecula's (City) Request for Proposal (RFP) No. 102 dated May 23, 2001, EDAW, Inc. (EDAW) submitted a proposal to the City dated June 5, 2001 with estimated man-hours, certificate ot insurance and other requested information. We were pleased to receive your e-mail message on June 8, 2001 indicating we have been selected to perform the environmental monitoring and reporting for the 3.12-acre mitigation site. In response to your request, herein is a follow-up detailed scope and cost proposal. Scope of Work EDAW will provide qualified restoration ecologists to perform monitoring and reporting services described in the Habitat MJtl'gab~n and Mozfftoring Plan - Camyoos Verdes Development Project and Mutrieta .rl Project (Robert Bein, Frost & Associates 1997) and listed under Scope of Services in the City's RFP No. 102. EDAW will furnish all materials and equipment necessary to perform the environmental monitoring services (e.g., vehicles, video camera, and flagging). Based on our understanding of the project, our services will be required between the later half of 2001 through 2007. Within this proposal, the scope of work is divided between two prLmary tasks: Task 1: Pre-Construction Conference and Installation/Establishment Monitoring and Task 2: Five Years of Monitoring and Reporting. Task 1: Pre-Construction Conference and Installation/Establishment Monitoring EDAW shall attend a pre-construction conference to review the project schedule, expectations, and communication protocols. The primary components that will be monitored as part of project implementation include exotic species removal native plant installation, and installation of the irrigation system. EDAW shall video and still photograph construction progress; perform on site observations as a basis of determining that the project is proceeding in accordance with project permit conditions; make recommendations in writing regarding requests of the installation/maintenance Contractor for modifications in the plans and DESIGN, PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTS WORLDWIDE Mr. Greg J. Butler, P. E City of Temecula Department of Public Works June 26, 2001 Page 2 specifications; prepare and submit to the Contractor a list of items requiring correction and verify that each correction has been made prior to the commencement of the plant establishment period (PEP); perform observations during and at the end of the PEP; and recommend that the City accept the site once all necessary items have been addressed. Our review of the Habitat Mitigation and Monitoring Plan - Campos VeJ'des Develqoment Project and Murdeta IIProject did not reveal the length of the PEP or how many environmental monitoring visits are expected during this period. Based on our experience with similar projects, we assume the PEP will be scheduled for 120 days and once installation is considered complete, environmental monitoring will be required on average on a monthly basis. Task 2: Five Years of Monitoring and Reporting At part of this task, EDAW will perform required horticultural and botanical monitoring; prepare five (5) annual reports; and communicate with the Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) to help facilitate sign-off of the ACOE permit at the successful completion of the mitigation program. Horticultural monitoring assessing weeds, erosion, soil moisture and plant health will be performed twice a year for each of the five years. In accordance with the project's Mitigation and Monitoring Plan, permanent plots will be established in the site to collect data on native and non-native plant cover and survivorship of the container plants. Annual photographs will be taken of these plots. In accordance with the plan, during each year one sampling will occur in late spring (May or June) to collect cover data and one sampling will be done in the fall (November) to determine plant survival rates and additional planting needs. Annual monitoring reports will be prepared that will present horticultural and botanical monitoring results, photographs, an assessment of mitigation site progress relative to the project success standards, and any necessary remedial measures (e.g., replacement planting) to ensure the mitigation is successful. A draft of the annual report will be submitted to the City for review and comment, before it is finalized and submitted to ACOE. EDAW will coordinate with the City and communicate with ACOE to help facilitate sign-off of the ACOE permit when the mitigation is complete. Once project success standards have been achieved, EDAW will send a notice of completion to ACOE. As part of this scope, EDAW is available to meet onsite with ACOE to help obtain permit sign-off. Mr. Greg J. Butler, P. E City of Temecula Department of Public Works June 26, 2001 Page 3 Assumptions The scope of work will be completed prior to 2008. Monitoring and reporting beyond five years after installation (and the PEP) that may be necessary because of site neglect by the maintenance contractor or acts of nature, will constitute out of scope work. Copies of all relevant project background material (e.g., permits, aerial photographs, topographic base maps, landscape plans and specifications, etc.) will be provided to EDAW. 3. EDAW willbe granted unrestricted access to the site (e.g., keys to any gates). Cost Estimate We propose to perform the project and a Time-and-Materials basis, not exceed $58,538 without written authorization from the City. If there a significant change in site conditions that requires additional environmental monitoring oversight or a change in scope, EDAW will negotiate with the City for additional funds to cover these out of scope items. Attached is our 2001 Schedule of Fees. Due to the length of the project, we propose a 5 percent annual increase in our labor rates. The cost estimate herein reflects this annual labor rate increase. Task 1: Pre-Construction Conference and Inst~llation/Establishment Monitoring $7,007 Task 2: Five Years of Monitoring and Reporting Year One $11,239 Year Two $9,914 Year Three $8,986 Year Four $10,104 Year Five $11,288 Subtotal $51,531 Total $58,538 DESIGN, PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTS WORLDWIDE Mr. Greg J. Butler, P. E City of Temecula Department of Public Works June 26, 2001 Page 4 If you have any questions concerning this proposal, please contact Jim Prine at (619) 233-1454. We assume for these services you would like to execute a City of Temecula contract. If you would like to execute an EDAW contract, we can forward you the terms and conditions for your review. Sincerely, Attachment: Current Billing Rate Schedule EDAW tNC 1420 KETTNER BLVD SUITE 620 ASIA SCHEDULE OF FEES Environmental Services Principal Senior Associate Senior Project Manager Senior Environmental Engineer Environmental Engineer Senior Environmental Specialist Senior Environmental Planner Environmental Project Manager Environmental Specialist Environmental Analyst Environmental Monitor Environmental Technician Bioloeical Resource Services Senior Biologist III $125 Senior Biologist 1I $100 Senior Biologist I $90 Biologist III $75 Biologist II $65 Biologist I $50 Biological Monitor $60 Biological Technician $40 Cultural Resource Services Principal Archaeologist $150 Senior Associate Archaeologist $110 Senior Archaeologist Il $105 Senior Archaeologist I $85 Project Archaeologist $75 StaffArchaeologist li $65 Staff Archaeologist I $60 Senior Architectural Historian $95 Historian $75 Crew Chief $55 Archaeological Monitor $55 Archaeological Technician II $50 Archaeological Technician I $45 Support Services $150 Administrative $65 · $130 Technical Editor $65 $110 Senior (3IS Specialist $90 $125 GIS Specialist $65 $85 (3raphic Artist $65 $100 Word Processor $55 $100 Clerical $45 $95 lntern $30 $75 $70 General Terms $60 EDAW 4x4 Vehicle Use $95.00 daily $40 $2,200 monthly EDAW Automobile Use $50.00 daily GPS System Use $75.00 daily ATV Use $30.00 daily Rangefinder Use $15.00 daily Binocular Use $15.00 daily Camera Use $15.00 daily Film Charge $5.00 per roll Cellular Phone $0.60 per min. Facsimile $0.50 per page Field Radio Use $15.00 daily Office Xerox Copies $0.10 per page Color Reproductions 8-1/2 x 11 $0.85 each 11 x 17 $1.15 each Color Plots 18 x 24 $8.00 each 24 x 36 $12.00 each 36 x 48 $16.00 each Other reimbursable expenses and subconsultants will be billed at cost plus 10%. Invoices will be submiRed monthly for work in progress unless otherwise agreed. Invoices are due and payable within 30 days after invoice date. DESIGN. PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTS WORLDWIDE ITEM 14 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council APPROVAL ClTYATTORNEY ~ II DIRECTOR OF FINAR_C~ II CITY MANAGER /~/~J~William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer July 24, 2001 Professional Services Agreement for Design Services Fire Station Wolf Creek Site, Project No. PW01-11 PREPARED BY: Greg Butler, Senior Engineer - CIP RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: Approve an acceleration of $100,000 from the Capital Improvement Program Budget for FY2002-2003 to the current FY2001-2002 budget for the Fire Station Wolf Creek Site, Project No. PW01-11. Approve a Professional Services Agreement with STK Architecture, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $159,500.00 to provide design services for the Fire Station Wolf Creek Site, Project No. PW01-11, within the planned Wolf Creek Development and authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement. Authorize the City Manager to approve amendments/change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $15,950.00, which is equal to 10% of the agreement. BACKGROUND: The current CIP budget indicates an expenditure over a two (2) fiscal year period. In order to award the design contract for the Wolf Creek Fire Station, in the full contract amount plus have funds available for the contingency, and adequately provide for administration costs in this fiscal year, staff is requesting that the City Council accelerate the $100,000 obligation of Administration funds from Fiscal Year 2002-2003 to Fiscal Year 2001-2002 for a total of $105,730.00. In order to maintain the City's goal of a maximum 5-minute response time for emergencies, a new Heavy Urban Fire Station is needed in the southern portion of the City. The Wolf Creek development has been conditioned to provide the land for the planned Fire Station, with the City being responsible for the completion of the design and construction. Design, construction and occupancy of this new Fire Station has been placed on a fast track, high priority schedule in an effod to provide a permanent Fire Station to serve the Vail Ranch portion of the City and the future Wolf Creek development. For this reason the City has elected to utilize STK to complete the design of the new station. STK has been selected by Riverside County Fire as the best qualified firm to complete the design of the last 6 fire Stations. They will be able to make minor modifications and adapt their existing Riverside County Fire Department Standard Heavy Urban Fire Station design to the Wolf Creek site. 1 R:~AGDRPT~.001/0724\PW01-11STKagr. DOC FISCAL IMPACT: The Fire Station Wolf Creek Site is a Capital Improvement Project funded through Development Impact Fees - Fire, Public Facilities & Public Service. The acceleration of funds from the Capital Improvement Budget FY2002-03 to the current FY2001-02 is necessary to cover administrative costs and the professional design services agreement and administration costs in the amount of $159,500.00, plus the contingency amount of $15,950.00, for a total amount of $175,450.00. ATTACHMENTS: Project Location Project Description Professional Services Agreement 2 CITY OF TEMECULA AGREEMENT FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT SERVICES FOR THE WOLF CREEK FIRE STATION PROJECT NO. PW01-11 THIS AGREEMENT, is made and effective as of July 24, 2001, between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation ("City") and STK Amhitacture, Inc., ("Consultant"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. TERM. This Agreement shall commence on July 24, 2001, and shall remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than December 31, 2002, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. 2. SERVICES. Consultant shall perform the services and tasks described and set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. Consultant shall complete the tasks according to the schedule of performance which is also set forth in Exhibit A. 3. PERFORMANCE. Consultant shall at all times faithfully, competently and to the best of his or her ability, experience, and talent, perform all tasks described.herein. Consultant shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of Consultant hereunder in meeting its obligations under this Agreement. 4. PREVAILING WAGES. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contractor from the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. These rates are on file with the City Clerk. Copies may be obtained at cost at the City Clerk's office of Temecula. Consultant shall provide a copy of prevailing wage rates to any staff or sub-contractor hired, and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. Consultant shall comply with the provisions of Sections 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code. Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, Consultant shall forfeit to the City, as a penalty, the sum of $25.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any work done under this contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of the Contract. 5. PAYMENT. a. The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and terms and the schedule of payment as set forth in Exhibit B, Payment Rates and Schedule, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. Any terms in Exhibit B other than the payment rates and schedule of payment are null and void. This amount shall not exceed One hundred fifty nine thousand five hundred Dollars and no Cents ($159,500.00) for the total term of the Agreement unless additional payment is approved as provided in this Agreement. b. The City Manager may approve additional work not to exceed ten percent (10%) of the amount of the Agreement. I R:\CIP\PROJECTS\PWOI',PWO 1-1 I\STK A~reernnt.doc c. Consultant will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed. Invoices shall be submitted between the first and fifteenth business day of each month, for services previded in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice as to all non-disputed fees. If the City disputes any of consultant's fees it shall give written notice to Consultant within 30 days of receipt of a invoice of any disputed fees set forth on the invoice. 6. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT WITHOUT CAUSE. a. The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the consultant at least ten (10) days prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Consultant shall immediately cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice prevides otherwise. If the City suspends or terminates a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement. b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pureuant to this Section, the City shall pay to Consultant the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination, previded that the work performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the Agreement pursuant to this Section, the Consultant will submit an invoice to the City pursuant to Section 4. 7. DEFAULT OF CONSULTANT. a. The Consultant's failure to comply with the previsions of this Agreement shall constitute a default. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under the terms of this Agreement, City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by written notice to the Consultant. If such failure by the Consultant to make progress in the performance of work hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Consultant's control, and without fault or negligence of the Consultant, it shall not be considered a default. b. If the City Manager or his delegate determines that the Consultant is in default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the Consultant with written notice of the default. The Consultant shall have (10) days after service upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the Consultant fails to cure its default within such pedod of time, the City shall have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement. 8. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS. a. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to sales, costs, expenses, receipts and other such information required by City that relate to the performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain adequate records of services provided in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of services. All such records shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be clearly identified and readily accessible. Consultant shall previde free access to the representatives of City or its designees at reasonable times to such books and records, shall give City the right to examine and audit said books and records, shall permit City to make transcripts there from as necessary, and shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings and activities related to this Agreement. Such records, together with supporting documents, shall be maintained fora period of three (3) years after receipt of final payment. b. Upon completion of, or in the event of termination or suspension of this Agreement, all original documents, designs, drawings, maps, models, computer files containing data generated for the work, surveys, notes, and other documents prepared in the course of providing the services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission of the Consultant. With respect to computer files containing data generated for the work, Consultant shall submit electronic copies of the designs in AutoCAD® 2000 format. All word processing files shall be submitted in Microsoft Word format, all spreadsheets shall be submitted in Microsoft Excel format. Any other electronic files submitted shall be submitted in industry standard formats, subject to the approval of the City. c. With respect to the design of public improvements, the Consultant shall not be liable for any injuries or property damage resulting from the reuse of the design at a location other than that specified in Exhibit A without the written consent of the Consultant. The City shall indemnify and hold the consultant harmless when any material from this scope of work is re-used without the consultant's permission. 9. INDEMNIFICATION. The Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, including attorney fees and expert witness fees, or liability of any kind or nature which the City, its officers, agents and employees may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of Consultant's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions adsing out of or in any way related to the performance or non-performance of this Agreement, excepting only liability adsing out of the negligence of the City. 10. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS. Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, its agents, representatives, or employees. a. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as: Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability form No. CG 00 01 11 85 or 88. (2) Insurance Services Office Business Auto Coverage form CA 00 01 06 92 covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto). If the Consultant owns no automobiles, a non-owned auto endorsement to the General Liability policy described above is acceptable. (3) Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Employer's Liability Insurance. If the Consultant has no employees while performing under this Agreement, worker's compensation insurance is not required, but Consultant shall execute a declaration that it has no employees. (4) Professional Liability Insurance shall be written on a policy form providing professional liability for the Consultant's profession. b. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no less than: General Liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. (2) Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage. (3) Worker's Compensation as required by the State of California; Employer's Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury or disease. (4) Professional Liability coverage: Two million ($2,000,000) per claim and in aggregate. c. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City Manager. At the option of the City Manager, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers; or the Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense expenses. d. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions: (1) The City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Consultant; products and completed operations of the Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by the Consultant; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Consultant. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers. (2) For any claims related to this project, the Consultant's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insured maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute with it. (3) Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers. (4) The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. (5) Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days' prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the City. 4 R:~CIP~PROJECTS\PW0 I\PW01-11~1'~ Anr~mnt dnn e. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. Self insurance shall not be considered to comply with these insurance requirements. f. Verification of Coveraqe. Consultant shall furnish the City with original endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed bya person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be on forms provided by the City. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. As an alternative to the City's forms, the Consultant's insurer may provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements effecting the coverage required by these specifications. 11. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. a. Consultant is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Neither City nor any of its officers, employees, agents, or volunteers shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of Consultant's officers, employees, or agents except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. Consultant shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any manner. b. No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Consultant as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for performing services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder. 12. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES. The Consultant shall keep itself informed of all local, State and Federal ordinances, laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Consultant shall at all times observe and comply with all such ordinances, laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Consultant to comply with this section. 13. RELEASE OF INFORMATION. a. All information gained by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential and shall not be released by Consultant without City's pdor written authorization. Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not without wdtten authorization from the City Manager or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the work performed under this Agreement or relating to any project or property located within the City. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered "voluntary" provided Consultant gives City notice of such court order or subpoena. b. Consultant shall promptly notify City should Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed there under or with respect to any project or property located within the City. City retains the dght, but has no obligation, to represent Consultant and/or be present at any deposition, headng or similar proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Consultant. However, City's right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or rewdte said response. 14. NOTICES. Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other pady under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (I) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice. Notice shall be effective upon delivery to the addresses specified below or on the third business day following deposit with the document delivery service or United States Mail as provided above. To City: City of Temecula Attention: City Manager Mailing Address: P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, California 92589-9033 Street Address: 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, California 92590 To Consultant: STK Architecture, Inc. 2575 South San Jacinto Ave. San Jacinto, CA 92583-5318 Attention: G.V. Salts 15. ASSIGNMENT. The Consultant shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without pdor wdtten consent of the City. Upon termination of this Agreement, Consultant's sole compensation shall be payment for actual services performed up to, and including, the date of termination or as may be otherwise agreed to in writing between the City Council and the Consultant. 16. LICENSES. At all times during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall have in full rome and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the services described in this Agreement. 17. GOVERNING LAW. The City and Consultant understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event such litigation is filed by one party against the other to enfome its rights under this Agreement, the prevailing party, as determined by the Court's judgment, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and litigation expenses for the relief granted. 18. PROHIBITED INTEREST. No officer, or employee of the City of Temecula shall have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, the proceeds thereof, the Contractor, or Contractor's sub-contractors for this project, during his/her tenure or for one year thereafter. The Contractor hereby warrants and represents to the City that no officer or employee of the City of Temecula has any interest, whether contractual, non-contractual, financial or otherwise, in this transaction, or in the business of the Contractor or Contractor's sub-contractors on this project. Contractor further agrees to notify the City in the event any such interest is discovered whether or not such interest is prohibited by law or this Agreement. 19. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All pdor or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or wdtten, ara merged into this Agreement and shall be of no fudher force or effect. Each party is entedng into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material. 20. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT. The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Consultant warrants and represents that he or she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Consultant and has the authority to bind Consultant to the performance of its obligations hereunder. 7 R:\CIP\PROJECTS\PW01 \PW01-11\STK Aoreemnt.doc IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. ClTY OFTEMECULA Jeff Comerchero, Mayor Attest: Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk Approved As to Form: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney CONSULTANT STK Architecture, Inc 2575 San Jacinto Ave. San Jacinto, CA 92583-5318 By: Name: Title: By: Name: Title: (Signatures of two corporate officers required for Corporations) 8 R:\CIP~PROJECTS\PWOI\PW01-1 I\STK A(3reemnt.doc EXHIBIT A TASKS TO BE PERFORMED 9 R:\CIP\PROJ ECTS\PWO I\PWO 1-11 ~RTK Anm~mnf dn~ 4 June 2001 Greg Butler, Senior Engineer Department of Public Works CITY OF TEMECULA 30650 Pauba Road Temecula, California 92592 RE: PROPOSAL FOR ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES FOR FOR 3-BAY HEAVY-URBAN PLAN, RFQ NO. 101 WOLF CREEK FIRE STATION Mr Butler: We appreciate the opportunity to work with the City of Temecula. In order to be clear about our effort, and based on our experience, the following tasks are necessary to accomplish your goals. 1.0 Research 1.1 Review available Wolf Creek Design Guidelines. 1.2 Verify on-site field conditions. (STK to provide site Topo and preliminary Soils Report 1.3 Establish exact design (based on Development Guidelines), and utility program requirements. 2.0 Schematic Design 2.1 Clearly develop exterior elevations and site pan consistent with Wolf Creek Development Guidelines. Provide colored elevations, a rendering, and material sample boards. 2.2 Meet with City of Temecula and Fire Department. 2.3 Prepare exterior elevations, rendering, floor plan, site plan, and landscape planting concept plan for DRC. 3.0 Design Development: 3.1 3.2 Meet with City of Temecula and Fire Department to review and adjust design as needed. Develop Document Package and Cost Estimate. ARCHITECTURE INTERIOR DESIGN PLANNING CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 2575 South San Jac]nto Ave,, San Jacinto, California 92553-5318 Phone: 909/925-2504 Fax: 909/925-0244 E-Maih 5tk@stkinc.com Greg Butler, City of Temecula Wolf Creek F.S. Proposal 4 June 2001 Page 2 4.0 Construction Documents: 4.1 Develop plans and specifications for final Construction Package, based on direction approved by City of Temecula in 3.0 above. 4.2 Complete all Construction drawings & specifications, and submittal forms for Plan Check submission to City of Temecula Building & Safety. 4.3 Incorporate City of Temecula Building & Safety comments into plans for approved Permit Set. 4.4 Submit one (1)set of drawings (mylar) and one (1)set of specifications to the City for bidding. 5.0 Bidding: 5.1 Assist contractor (or contractors) with bidding questions, clarifications, addenda, etc. 5.2 Assist City of Temecula in making final contractor selection. 5.3 Provide Addenda as required. 6.0 Construction Support: 6.1 Review submittals and shop drawings. 6.2 Complete on-site observations by the Design Team, on a bi-monthly (every two weeks) basis. 6.3 Answer questions, provide clarification sketches, issue Change Orders, approve Pay Applications, etc, throughout construction. 6.4 Prepare "punch list" of final corrections at construction completion, and review their incorporation. 6.5 Prepare "As-Built" plans (mylar), and provide on disk as well. The Fee reflects the following assumptions: 1. The Station is to be a site adaptation/reuse of the RivCo heavy urban 3-Bay Fire Station to conform to the Developer's architectural requirements. 2. The Fee includes complete plans and specifications as approved by the Fire Department and the City of Temecula. 3. The Consultants provided within this scope to include Soils Engineering (Preliminary Soils Report), Civil Engineer Topo Survey and (on-site grading plan), Structural, Mechanical, Electrical Engineering, and Landscape Architecture. 4. Our scope of work for site plan is to develop a design incorporating the Fire Station, access (ingress and egress), parking, trash enclosure, fuel storage tanks, hose drying ramp, CMU walls, etc. Greg Butler, City of Temecula Wolf Creek F.S. Proposal 4 June 2001 Page 3 5. Included are anticipated meetings between the Architect, Fire Department, and the City of Temecula. EXHIBIT B PAYMENT RATES AND SCHEDULE 10 R:\ClP~PROJECTS\PW01 \PW01-1 I\STK Aoreemnt.doc We propose to provide Architectural Services for 7.1% of the "on-site" construction cost. Estimated cost of "on-site" construction $ 2,000,000 (Construction cost within the property lines of the site) x 7.1% Contract "A" (Percentage of Construction Cost) ± $ 142,000 Contract "B" Estimate (Hourly for coordination of all "off-site work) ± $ 15,000 This Fee does not include the following: A. Any Permit, Development, Utility, or Processing Fees. B. Miscellaneous reimbursable expenses for printing, mailing, travel, etc. (Estimated amount to be $2,500.) C. Geotechnical and material testing during construction phase. D. Street design or utility extension plans. E. Specialty Consultants (i.e. Deputy/Special Inspectors, Hazardous Waste, Traffic, Archeological, etc) The Fee will be broken down into the following Phases: Research/Base Plans/Schematics (15%) Design Development (15%) Construction Documents (50%) Bidding (5%) Construction Support (15%) = $ 21,300 = 21,300 = 71,000 = 7,000 = 21,300 $142,000 Total The Fee will be invoiced monthly, based on the percentage of work completed, plus any reimbursable expenses. All such expenses are billed at cost, and with supporting docu- mentation attached. Any invoices unpaid 45 days after the invoice date will bear interest at the rate of 1% per month, or 12% per year. STK Inc assumes the contract will be executed on a standard City of Temecula Contract, edited to suit the project specifics. Please also note, that STK Inc carries $2,000,000 of Professional Liability coverage. (Note: STK can provide all the insurance requirements requested.) If Extra Services are required, and approved by the City of Temecula, the following rates would apply: Greg Butler, City of Temecula Wolf Creek F.S. Proposal 4 June 2001 Page 4 Principal $135/Hr Associate 85/Hr Project Manager 70/Hr Senior Draftsman 60/Hr Junior Draftsman 55/Hr Clerical 35/Hr Consultants Cost x 1.15 Reimbursables Cost x 1.0 Reimb. Agency Fees Cost x 1.05 We look forward to the opportunity of our Team working with your Company'. Should you have any question, or wish to discuss this Proposal, please give me a call. Sincerely, STK A~CHITECTU~E, INC G.V. Salts, Architect Principal GVS/pma Enc's: Gross Project Cost Estimate; Consultants Hourly Rates ITEM 15 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY ?r---~-- II DIRECTOR OF FINANCE..,~L---II CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer July 24, 2001 FY2000-2001 Slurry Seal Program, Project No. PW01-07 Add Diaz Road PREPARED BY: Greg Butler, Senior Engineer - Capital Projects RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council authorize the City Manager to approve contract change orders with American Asphalt for an amount of $45,000 above the previously approved 10% contingency for the FY2000-2001 Slurry Seal Program, Project No. PW01-07. BACKGROUND: On May 22, 2001 the City Council awarded a construction contract to American Asphalt Repair and Resurfacing, Inc. in the amount of $277, 465.50 for said project and authorized the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed a 10% contingency. The work of the slurry seal project entails cleaning the streets, cleaning and sealing cracks in the pavement and then applying a rubberized asphalt slurry over the entire roadway. During the course of the work a single $5,000 contract change order was issued to cover some added crack sealing on streets identified as needing this preventive maintenance. Because Diaz Road has been identified as needing extensive maintenance, which per the city wide pavement management system is not scheduled to be completed for 2-3 years, staff is recommending that American Asphalt's contract be extended to include preventive maintenance measures that will include application of the rubberized asphalt slurry seal. American Asphalt has reviewed the condition of Diaz road and have submitted a work plan and cost proposal to complete the necessary repairs. The cost of the proposed repairs exceed the project's remaining contingency and the City Manager's approving authority by approximately $45,000. The preventive maintenance being completed at this time is a cost effective means of extending the life of the existing street surface until such time as permanent repairs and reconstruction can be completed as prioritized in the pavement management system. FISCAL IMPACT: This project is funded with Public Works Department Routine Street Maintenance Funds. Adequate funds are available in Account 001-164-601-5402. ATTACHMENTS: Contract Change Order Summary Page 1 of 1 Change Order Summary/Contingency Balance FY2000-2001 Slurry Seal Program PW01-07 CCO 1 I Added crack seal $ 5,315.00 $ 5,315.00 CCO 2 I Add Diaz Road $ 2 $ 64,375.00 $ 64,375.00 CCO 3 1 $ Total Chan~le Orders $ 69,690.00 Contract Item Overage/underage Various (See attached) Total Amount $ Beginning Contingency (10%) $ 27,746.55 Additional Allocation (pending) $ 45,000.00 Adjusted Balance $ 72,746.55 Contract Change orders $ 69,690.00 Item Over/underruns $ Contin~lency Remainin~l $ 3,056.55 Sheet 1 as of: 11:39 AM 0107Contingency 07/12/2001 ITEM 16 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANCE CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: ,~ity Manager/City Council FROM: .'~-J/(/~/illiam G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: July 24, 2001 SUBJECT: Completion and Acceptance of Construction Contract for Old Town Southside Parking Lot, Project No. PW98-16 PREPARED BY: Ward Maxwell, Associate Engineer- Capital Projects Julie Dauer, CIP Specialist RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: Accept the project, "Old Town Southside Parking Lot, Project No. PW98-16 ", as complete; and File a Notice of Completion, release the performance Bond, and accept a twelve (12) month Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract; and Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after filing of the Notice of Completion, if no liens have been filed. BACKGROUND: On August 8, 2000, the City Council awarded the construction contract to TruGreen Landcare, LLC of Anaheim, California, in the amount of $335,175.00 for said project and authorized the City Manager to approve change orders that are within the 10% contingency. The total cost of the project including authorized contract change orders and quantity adjustments was $327,838.18. This project consisted of rehabilitation of the existing asphalt pavement; miscellaneous colored concrete curb and gutter; new parking lot striping; new irrigation and landscaping; and the installation of a new parking lot lighting system utilizing Old Town Streetscape standards. The Contractor has completed the work in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and within the allotted contract time to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The construction retention for this project will be released on or about 35 days after the Notice of Completion has been recorded. FISCAL IMPACT: The Old Town Southside Parking Lot project was funded by Redevelopment Agency funds. Contract Change Order No. 1 was approved by the City Manager in the amount of ($1,854.32). The total cost of the project including the authorized contract change order and quantity adjustments was $327,838.18. 1 r:~agd rpt~2001\0724~w98-16.acc ATrACHMENTS: 1. Notice of Completion 2. Maintenance Bond 3. Contractor's Affidavit 2 r:~gdrpt~001\0724~w98-16.acc .RECORDING RE UQ..~.~TED BY AND RETURN TO: CITY CLERK CITY OF TEMECULA P.O. Box 9033 43200 Business Park Drive Temecu[a, CA 92589-9033 NOTICE OF COMPLETION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT: The City of Temecula is the owner of the property hereinafter described. The full address of the City of Temecula is 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California 92590. 3. A Contract was awarded by the City of Temecula to TruGreen LandCare to perform the following work of improvement: Old Town Southside Parking Lot 4. Said work was completed by said company according to plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works of the City of Temecula and that said work was accepted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on July 24, 2001. That upon said contract the Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America was surety for the bond given by the said company as required by law. 5. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, and is described as follows: PROJECT NO. PW98-16. 6. The street address of said property is: West of Old Town Front Street at the intersection of Second Street. Dated at Temecula, California, this 24th day of July, 200'1. STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) Susan W. Jones CMC, City Clerk I, Susan W. Jones CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California and do hereby certify under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing NOTICE OF COMPLETION is true and correct, and that said NOTICE OF COMPLETION was duly and regularly ordered to be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder of Riverside by said City Council. Dated at Temecula, California, this 24a day of July, 2001. Susan W. Jones CMC, City Clerk CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MAINTENANCE BOND ]~nd Nc,. 10326590300116-00l PROJECT NO. PW98-16 OLD TOWN SOUTHSIDE PARKING LOT KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENT THAT: TruGreen LandCare, a General Partnership~ 8618 Haskell Avenua~ Sepulveda, CA 93143 NAME AND ADDRESS CONTRACTOR'S a General Partnership (fill in whether a Corporation, Partnership or individual) , hereinafter called Principal, and Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America, 215 Shunan Blvd,~ Naperville, IL 60563 NAME AND ADDRESS OF SURETY hereinafter called SURETY, are held and firmly bound unto CITY OF TEMECULA, hereinafter called OWNER, in the penal sum of Thirty Two Thousand Seven Hundred EiKhty Three DOLLARS and Sixty One CENTS ($ 32r783.61 ) in lawful money of the United States, said sum being not less than ten (10%) of the Contract value payable by the said City of Temecula under the terms of the Contract, for the payment of which, we bind ourselves, successors, and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION is such that whereas, the Principal entered into a certain Contract with the OWNER, dated the 15ch day of Au~st , 2000, a copy of which is hereto attached and made a part hereof for the construction of PROJECT NO. PW98- 16, OLD TOWN SOUTHSlDE PARKING LOT. WHEREAS, said Contract provides that the Principal will furnish a bond conditioned to guarantee for the pedod of one (1) year after approval of the final estimate on said job, by the OWNER, against all defects in workmanship and materials which may become apparent during said period; and WHEREAS, the said Contract has been completed, and was the final estimate approved on July 10, , ~ 200l. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH, that if within one year from the date of approval of the final estimate on said job pursuant to the Contract, the work done under the terms of said Contract shall disclose poor workmanship in the execution of said work, and the carrying out of the terms of said Contract, or it shall appear that defective materials were furnished thereunder, then this obligation shall remain in full force and virtue, otherwise this instrument shall be void. As a part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to the face amount specified, costs and reasonable expenses and fees shall be included, including reasonable attorney's fees incurred' by the City of Temecula in successfully enforcing this obligation, all to be taxed as costs and included in any judgment rendered. MAINTENANCE BOND M-1 R:~cip~projects~w98-16',bid-al'Dc old town prkmg The Surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration, or addition to the terms of the Contract, or to the work to be performed thereunder, or to the specifications accompanying the same, shall in any way affect its obligations on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration, or addition to the terms of the Contract, or to the work, or to the Specifications. Signed and sealed this 26th day of Jtme ,2~O0~L 2001. (Seal) SURETY Travelers Casualty and Surety Conpany PaulaHall (Name) Attorney-in-Fact (T~le) APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney PRINCIPAL TruGreen LandCare, a General Partnership William Wainscott (Name) Director-Risk Mmn~ m=~ent (TiUe) By: (Name) (Title) MAINTENANCE BOND M-2 R :~cip~p~ojecls~pw98-16~d-doc old town prklng DESIGNATION OF REPRESENTATIVE I, Joseph B. Hanks, Vice President and Secretary of TruGreen LandCare L.L.C., partner of TruGreen LandCare, a California general partnership ("Company"), do hereby authorize and direct William Wainscott, Director of Risk Management, 860 Ridge Lake Blvd., Memphis, TN 38120, to represent the Company to execute any and all bonds issued on behalf o£.the Company. TRUGREEN LANDCARE, a California general partnership By: TruGreen LandCare L.L.C., partner Dated: 3 lo* IN WITNESS WHEREOF, TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND 'SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA, TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY, FARMINGTON CASUALTY COMPANY and TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF ILLINOIS have caused this iusu'ument to be signed by their Senior Vice President, and their co;porate seals to 10c hereto affixed this' 13th day of March, 2000· STATE OF CONNECTICUT }SS. Hartford COUNTY OF HARTFORD eeee TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SlJRETY COMPANY FARM]~GTON CASUALTY COMPANY TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF George W. Thompson Senior Vice President On this 13th day of March, 2000 before me ~rsenally came GEORGE W. TBOMPSON to mc lmown, who, being by me duly sworn, did depose and say: that he/she is Senior Vice President of TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA, TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY, FARMINGTON CASUALTY COMPANY and TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF n.I.INOIS, the corporations described m and which excented the above instrument; that he/she knows thc seals of said corporations; that thc seals afftxcd to the said in.Va'unmnt are such corporate seais; and that he/she executed thc said instrmnent on behalf of thc corporations by authority of his/her office under thc Standing Resolutions thereof.. State of TENNESSEE County of SI~ELBY On this ~ day of ~-~f~et~ , 2001, before me person , known to me to be the Attorney-in-Fact of FIREMAN'S FUND IN~, t .h_~co[~poration that executed the within instrnment, and acknowledged to me that such cor~~'h~ame. ~. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my the certificate first above written. aforesaid county, the day and year in this offi _.,~.,~. ffice (Notary Public) Assistant Secretary, Bond TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF AlV[ERICA TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY FARM]~GTON CASUALTY COlVlPANY Hartford, Connecticut 06183-9062 TRAVELERS CASUALTY ~ SURETY. COlVII)ANY OF II.{'.U',{'OiS Neperville, l]linois 60563-8458 POWER OF ATTORNEY AND CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORITY OF ATTORNEY(S)-IN-FACT KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, THAT TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA, TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY and FARMINGTON CASUALTY COMPANY, corporations duly organized under the laws of the State of Connecticut, and having their principal offices in the City of Hartford, County of Hartford, State of Connecticut, and TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF ILLINOIS, a corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of Illinois, and having its principal office in the City of Naperville, County of DuPage, State of Illinois, (h~reinaffer the "Companies") hath made, constituted and appointed, and do by these presents make, constitute and appoint: William Wainscott, Norton Cronin, Kareu M. Crawford, Victoria L. Carroll or Paula Hall * * of Memphis, TN, their true and lawfifl Attomey(s)-in-Fact, with full power and authority hereby conferred to sign, execute and acknowledge, at any place within the United Slates, or, ffthe following line be filled in, within the area there designated the following instrument(s): by Ms/her sole signature and act, any and all bonds, recognizances, contracts of indemnity, and other writings obligatory in the nature of a bond, recognizance, or conditional undertaking and any and all consents incident thereto not exceeding the sum of ONE MILLION ($1,000,000,00) DOLLARS per bond and to bind the Companies, thereby as fully and to the same extent as if the same were signed by the duly authorized officers of the Companies, and all the acts of said Attorney(s)-in-Fact, pursuant to the authority herein given, are hereby ratified and confirmed. This appointment is made under and by authority of the following Standing Kesolutions of said Companies, which Resolutions are now in full force and effect: VOTED: That the Chainnaa, the President, any Vice Chairman, any Executive Vice President, any Senior Vice President, any Vice President, any Second Vice President, the Treasurer, any Assistant Treasurer, the Corporate Secretary or any Assistant SecreUu3, may appoint Attemeys-in-Fact and Agents to act for and on behalf of the company and may give such appointee such authority as his or her certificate of authority raay prescribe to sign with the Company's name and seal with the Company's seal bonds, recogulzances, contracts of indemnity, and other writings obligatory in the nature ora bond, recognizance, or conditional undertaking, and any of said officers or the Board of Directors at any time may remove any such appointee and revoke the power given him or her. .. VOTED: That thc Chairman, the Prasidant~ any Vice Ghamnm~ any Executive Vice Prasidant,.any Seninr Vice President or any Vice President may delegate all or any part of the foregoing authority to.one or more officers or employees of this Gompany; provided that each such delegatien is. in writing and a copy thereof is filed in the office of the Secretary. VOIt~D: That any bond, recognizance, contract of indemXaty, or writing obligatory in the nature of a bond, recogni?.ance, or conditional undertaking shall be valid and binding upon the Company when (a) signed by the President, any Vice Chairman. any Executive Vice President, any Senior Vice President or any Vice President, any Second Vice President, the Treasurer, any Assistant Treasurer, the Corporate Secretary or any Assistant Secretmy and duly attested and sealed with the Company's seal by a Secretsxy or Assistant Secretary, or Co) duly executed (under seal, if required) by one or,~nore Attorneys-in-Fact and Agents pursuant to the power prescribed in his or her certificate or their ceCdficates of authoriV] or by one or more Company officers pursuant to a written delegation of authority. This Power of Attorney and Certificate of Authority is signed and sealed by facsimile under and by authority of the following Standing Resolution voted by the Boards of Directors of TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA, TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY, FARMINGTON CASUALTY COMPANY and TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF ILLINOIS, which Resolution is now in full force and effect: VOTED: That thc signature of each of the following officers: President, any Executive Vice President, any Senior Vice President, any Vice President, any Assistant Vice President, any Secretary, any Assistant Secretsry, and the seal of the Company may be affixed by facsimile to any power of attorney or to any certificate relating thereto appointing Resident Vice Presidents, Resident Assistant Secretaries or Attorneys-in-Fact for purposes only of execuling and attesting bends and undertakings and other writings obligatory in the nature th~eof, and any such power of attorney or certificate bearing such facsimile signature or facsimile seal shall be valid and binding upon the Company and any such power so executed and certified by such facsimile signature and facsimile seal shall be valid and binding upon the Company in the future with respect to any bond or undertaking to which it is attached. (8-9'0 cITYOF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CONTF~ACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT AND FINAL RELEASE PROJECT NO. PW98-'I 6 OLD TOWN $OUTHSIDE PARKING/CT This is to ce~fy thatTruGreen LandCar,e(hereinafter the "CONTRACTOR") declares to the City of Temecula, under oath, that he/she/it has paid in full for all materials, supplies, labor, services, tools, equipment, and all other bills ¢~ntracted for by the CONTRACTOR or by any of the CONTRACTOR's agents, employees or subcontractors used or in c~ntdbution to the exeCution of it's c~ntract with the City of Temecula, with regard to the building, erection, construction, or repair of that certain wod~ of improvement known as PROJECT NO. PW98-16. OLD TOWN SOUTHSIDE PARKING LOT, situated in the City of Temecula, State of California, more particularly described as follows: OLD TOWN SOUTHSIDE PARKING LOT The CONTRACTOR declares that it knows of no unpaid debts or claims arising out of said Contract which would constitute grounds for any third party to claim a Stop Notice against of any unpaid sums owing to the CONTRACTOR. Fur,her, in connection with the final payment cf the Contract, the CONTRACTOR hereby disputes the following amounts: Description Dollar Amount to Dispute -0- Pursuant to Pul~lic Contracts Code §7200, the CONTRACTOR Goes hereby fully release and acquit the City of Temecula and ail agents and employees of the City. and each of them, from any and all claims, debts, demands, or cause of action which exist or might exist in favor of the CONTRACTOR by reason of payment by the Cit7 of Temecula of any contract amount which the CONTRACTOR has not disputed above. Dated: 6/29/01 CONTRACTOR. Signature Mark Wesel, Regional Operations Print Name and Title Manager RELEASE LOCPTION:909 693 3929 RX TIME 06/25 'C'l 16:38 ITEM 17 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIR.OFFINANCE CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Jim Domenoe, Chief of Polic~)¢~ July 24, 2001 Third Amendment to Law Enforcement Services Agreement with County of Riverside RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the third amendment to Law Enforcement Services Agreement between the County of Riverside and the City of Temecula to include the hiring of one lieutenant, one traffic/motorcycle officer, and one community service officer. BACKGROUND: The City of Temecula has contracted with the County of Rivemide Sheriff's Department for law enforcement services since incorporation. On July 25, 2000 the City Council approved the existing five-year contract for law enforcement services with the County of Riverside. On November 14, 2000 the City Council approved the first amendment to the contract to address field-training costs associated with the addition of new officers. On February 27, 2001 the City Council approved the second amendment to the contract to provide for the addition of five patrol officers as a result of the Vail Ranch annexation. Temecula Police Department staffing levels are driven by a target ratio of one sworn officer for every one thousand residents. In an effort to maintain this ratio, two City-paid sworn positions were approved in the FY 2001-02 operating budget in addition to the five sworn positions added as a result of the Vail Ranoh annexation. The FY 2001-02 operating budget reflected the fact that 11 new sworn positions were added. This contract amendment reflects only seven positions, which means Temecula is receiving the benefit of 11 positions for the price of seven. The additional four positions consist of two investigators, one sergeant and one lieutenant. The following contract modifications are requested in order to meet the needs of our growing City and to ensure sufficient staffing resources to provide appropriate response times to calls for service. One dedicated lieutenant will be added to the Police Department's staff. The new lieutenant will be a dedicated liaison with city executive staff and will provide management oversight for the many special team programs currently in existence and provide additional management of the many city- dedicated functions. One motorcycle officer will be added to supplement the existing complement of five motorcycle officers. One of these motorcycle officers is dedicated to the Neighborhood Enforcement Team (NET), which provides dedicated traffic enforcement to the many neighborhoods in Temecula. The additional motorcycle officer would also be dedicated to the NET program and will enhance the ability of the police department to respond to the many requests for service within the city, including the newly incorporated Vail Ranch area. One Community Service Officer will be added to staff the future Vail Ranch Police Storefront facility. Currently the Police Department operates two full service storefronts that are staffed with a full time Community Service Officer as well as a part-time project employee. This new Community Service Officer is required to adequately staff the future facility and will be added later in the fiscal year, as the storefront location is identified and opened. FISCAL IMPACT: The cost of the three positions that will be added as a result of this contract amendment is approximately $337,000 per year at the current contract rates. Adequate funds have been included in the FY 2001-02 operating to cover staffing and other costs related to these positions. A'I-rACHMENT: Third Amendment to Agreement for Law Enforcement Services between County of Riverside and City of Temecula. ORIGINAL THIRD AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR ~AW ENPORCE~ENT SERVICES BETWEEN COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE AND CITY OF TEMECULA IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED that the Agreement for Law Enforcement Services between the County of Riverside and the City of Temecula, approved by the Board of Supervisors on December 19, 2000, for services effective July 1, 2000 through June 30, 2005, as amended December 19, 2000 and March 27, 2001, is hereby amended in the following respects only: 1. Attachment A is amended to read as follows: ATTACHMENT A CITY OF TEMECULA LEVEL OF SERVICE Average Patrol Services 132 supported hours per day. (Approximate equivalent of twenty-seven (27) Deputy Sheriff positions @ 1,780 annual productive hours per position standard.) Dedicated Positions One (1) Sheriff's Lieutenant Two (2) Sheriff's Sergeant positions Two (2) Deputy Sheriff (fully supported) positions-Special Enforcement Team Six (6) Deputy Sheriff (fully supported) positions-Community Policing Team Nine (9) Deputy Sheriff (fully supported) positions-Traffic/Motorcycle Team One (1) Deputy Sheriff (fully supported) position-K-9 Deputy Two (2) Deputy Sheriff (unsupported) positions-School Resource Officers (year-round) Eleven (11) Community Service Officer II positions One (1) Community Service Officer I position 1 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Temecula, by minute order or resolution duly adopted by its City Council, has caused this Agreement to be signed by its Mayor and attested and sealed by its Clerk, and the County of Riverside, by order of its Board of Supervisors, has caused this Agreement to be signed by the Chairman of said Board and sealed and attested by the Clerk of said Board, all on the dates indicated below. CITY OF TEMECULA Dated: By:. ATTEST: Name Title By:. Susan W. Jo,nes, CMC City Clerk Mayor Jeff Comerchero APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE Dasd: By: Chairman, Board of Supervisors ATTEST: Gerald A. Maloney Clerk of the Board By: Deputy FORM APPROVED COUI~f~OUNSEL J U L/"~5 ~00~ ITEM 18 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIR.OF FINANCE CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City ManagedCit~4~ouqcillM! Debbie Ubnoske;L~,recor o anning July 24, 2001 Roripaugh Specific Plan - Status Report PREPARED BY: Saied Naaseh, Project Planner RECOMMENDATION: Receive and File DISCUSSION: On July 17, 2001, the City Council and Planning Commission held a workshop on this project. The City Council and Planning Commission directed staff to form a Committee consisting of Mayor Comerchero, Council member Roberts, Planning Commissioner Chiniaeff, Planning Commissioner Telesio, and interested residents surrounding the site to address outstanding issues. This committee will meet initially on July 20th with subsequent meetings scheduled as necessary. Staff will provide an oral update of the Committee's recommendations at the City Council meeting. FISCAL IMPACT: N/A R:~S P\Roripaugh Ranch SP\new\CC status Report July 24.doc 1 ITEM 19 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIR.OF FINANCE CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Gary Thornhill, Deputy City Manager July 24, 2001 Walker Basin Specific Plan No.172 Substantial Conformance No.1 and Tentative Tract Map 29369 PREPARED BY: Stephen Brown, Senior Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the City Manager to prepare a letter is support of the 106 dwelling unit proposal developed by the Riverside County Planning Department Staff for the Walker Basin Specific Plan. BACKGROUND: The Walker Basin Specific Plan was first adopted in 1984 with a proposal for 1631 residential units and a golf course on 573 acres. This plan was later amended in 1988 to 1,444 dwelling units along with the original golf course concept. Considerable time passed before there was any progress. The golf course was recently completed and the developer is now in the process of gaining approval of a Tentative Tract Map. The current map that went forward to the Riverside County Planning Commission on July 11,2001 proposed 761 to 925 dwelling units. The 761 units reflect the number of single-family detached residential lots and the remaining 164 units would be an attached residential product such as apartments. The Riverside County Board of Supervisors directed the Planning Department to prepare a new residential development plan for Walker Basin at their meeting of May 1, 2001. The County Planning Staff examined the project site in an effort to propose a development concept that achieved the following Board directives: · Prepare a development plan that would not require the introduction of urban services, sewer infrastructure, or major road improvements. · Demonstrate compatibility with the surrounding rural large lot development. · Permit the developer to realize a fair economic return and realistically, achievable project. · Minimize the impacts on the natural features so the site such as wate~'courses, oak trees, and wildlife corridors. R:~BROWNS~agency review\Walker Basin cc stafrpt 7-24-01.doc 1 The County Planning Staff developed a concept that would institute lot sizes ranging from 2 to 5 acres. This proposal would allow the elimination of curbs and gutters as well as permitting a reduced width paved roadway. Also, many miles of streets could be potentially eliminated or down sized, including th(~ construction of De Luz Road. County Planning Staff suggested the larger lots could support the use of septic systems thus eliminating the need for sewer extension to the area. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATFACHMENTS: None R:~BROWNS~agency review~Walker Basin cc stafrpt 7-24-01.doc 2 ITEM 20 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANCE '~/''~''~' II C'TYMANAGER ~' II TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City ManageflCity Council William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer July 24, 2001 Woodside Homes Traffic Signal Reimbursement PREPARED BY: Ronald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the Refund of Traffic Signal DIF Fees in the amount of $45,000.00 to Woodside Homes of California for 50% of the cost of Traffic Signal Improvements at Margarita Road and Verde Lane. BACKGROUND: Planning Application No. PA 98-0323 (Tentative Tract Map No. 28510) was conditionally approved by the Planning Commission on February 3, 1999. The controlling condition was that the General Plan and Specific Plan had to be amended to conform to the revised land uses and densities. Planning Application Nos. PA99~0015 (Amendment No. 1 to Campos Verdes Specific Plan) and PA99-0016 (General Plan Amendment) were presented to the City Council on March 23, 1999, and the Ordinance was adopted on April 13, 1999 confirming these changes. One of the Conditions of Approval of the Tentative Map stated that the Developer"install a traffic signal at the intersection of Margarita Road and Verde Lane" and that the "Developer is eligible for DIF Credit for 50% cost of design and construction" for that signal. While such reimbursement is not typical for this type of traffic signal, in view of the improvements provided on Margarita Road and other public infrastructure related to the Promenade Mall, staff recommended this Condition. This Condition was subsequently approved bythe Planning Commission and made a part of the final Conditions of Approval for this project. Woodside Homes had taken the lead for the developers on the east side, funded 100% of the cost of $90,000 and installed the traffic signal. Lowe's Home Improvements has agreed to reimburse Woodside their half of the eastside cost which amounts to $22,500. Woodside Homes is requesting a refund of 50% of the total cost from the City in the amount of $45,000. They have submitted paid invoices that identify the cost of the signal to be in excess of $90,000. Woodside Homes, in addition to their participation, has paid in excess of $26,000 in Traffic Signal DIF fees. The DIF Refund would be consistent with the Conditions of Approval placed on both Planning Applications and as understood by the developers. There would be no further Traffic Signal DIF Credits available to any developers on these parcels. 1 R:~AGDRPT~2001\0724\Woodside Homes signaLDOCWoodside Homes Signal FISCAL IMPACT: There would be a reduction of the Traffic Signal component of the DIF fees collected for these projects in the amount of $45,000. ATTACHMENTS: 2. 3. 4. 5. Letter from Woodside Homes dated Mamh 16, 2001 Invoice from Woodside Homes Conditions of Approval of Tentative Tract 28510 dated Feb. 3, 1999 Conditions of Approval of Tentative PM 29175 Conditions of Approval for Lowe's Home Improvements 2 R:~AGDRpT~200 l~0724~Woodside Homes signaI,DOCWoodside Homes Signal Woodside^A 8irnpl~ The Best...B~ Design Woodside Homes of California, Inc. 23121 Antonio Parkway, Suite 120 Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688 Phone: 949-858-4980 Fax: 949-858-4984 March 16, 2001 Mr. Ron Parks Public Works Department P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Fax (909) 694-6475 RECEIVED MAR 2 9 2001 CiTY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Dear Mr. Parks: As we discussed, with this letter I request that the City of Temecula reimburse Woodside Homes for 50% of the traffic light that was installed in the Lowes Shopping Center at Margarita Road and Verde Lane. Per our agreement, Lowes will pay 25%, Woodside 25%, and the City 50%. I have enclosed an executed contract for $90,000. The City's portion of this is $45,000. Please send payment to my attention at the address above. Please contact me if you have any questions. Thank you for your assistance. Sincerely, Scott~.~G ale/~ Project Manager Woodside^A 8irnpl~ The Best...B~ Design Woodside Homes of California, ]:nc. 23121 Antonio Parkway, Suite 120 Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688 Phone: 949-858-4980 Fox: 949-858-4984 INVOICE Date: To: March 28, 2001 City of Temecula Attention: Ron Parks P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Quantity Description Cost 1 Reimbursement for 50% of the cost of traffic light $45,000 installed in Lowes Shopping Center at Margarita Road and Verde Lane. Total $45,000 Please remit payment immediately to: Attention: Scott Gale Woodside Homes 23121 Antonio Parkway, Suite 120 Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688. Thank you. Please contact me at (949) 858- 4980 ext. 232 if you have any questions. - City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive · PO Box 9033 · Temecula · California 92589-9033 (909) 694-6400 ·FAX (909) 694-6477 % , February 5, 1999 Mr. Nate Pugsley Woodside Homes 30211 Banderas, Ste. 130 Rancho Santa Margarite, CA 92688 SUBJECT: Planning Commission Conditional Approval and Final Conditions of Approval for Planning Application No. PA98-0323 (Tentative Tract Map 28510) and recommendation of approval to the City Council for Planning Application PA99- 0016 (General Plan Amendment) and Planning Application No. PA99-0015 (Amendment No. 1 to Campos Verdes Specific). Dear Mr. Pugsley: On February 3, 1999, the City of Temecula Planning Commission conditionally approved Planning Application No. PA 98-0398 (Tentative Tract Map 28510) subject to the enclosed Conditions of Approval, and recommended the City Council approve Planning Application No. PA99-0016 (General Plan Amendment) and Planning Application No. PA99-0015 (Amendment No. 1 to Campos Verdes Specific). Please review the final conditions of approval for the Tentative Tract Map and return a wet signed copy within three (3) working days of the receipt of this letter. Please be sure to sign both the Conditions of Approval of the Development Plan. As stated in the Conditions of Approval, the Tentative Tract Map's approval is subject to receiving approval of the General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan Amendment by the City Council. The Tract Map will have no force and effect until the related amendments are approved and adopted by the City Council. The conditional approval of the Tentative Tract Map is effective until February 3, 2001 (assuming approval and adoption of the corresponding amendments are received), unless extended in accordance with the City's Subdivision Ordinance. Written request for a time extension must be submitted to the City of Temecula a minimum of 30 days prior to the expiration date. R:\planning\323pa98apr .doc If you have any further questions regarding this subject or this approval, please contact me at (909) 694-6400. Sincerely, Patty Anders Assistant Planner CCi Run Parks, Department of Public Works Anthony Elmo, Building & Safety Department Herman Parker, Temecula Community Services District Phil Albanese, Riverside County Fire Department Rancho California Water District Temecula Valley Unified School District Riverside County Flood Control Riverside County Health Department Temecula Police Department Eastern Municipal Water District Southern California Gas Company Southern California Edison Company Caltrans General Telephone Company Mr. Bill Green RBF 27555 Ynez Road, Suite 400 Temecula, CA 92591-4679 R:~planning\323pa98apr.doc 28. A Grading Permit for either rough or precise grading shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained road right-of-way. 29. 30. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way. All improvement plans, grading plans, landscape and irrigation plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars. 31. Pdor to Approval of the Final Map, unless other timing is indicated, the Developer shall complete the following or have plans submitted and approved, subdivision improvement agreements executed and securities posted: 32. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board Rancho California Water District Eastern Municipal Water Distdct Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District City of Temecula Fire Bureau Planning Department Department of Public Works Riverside County Health Department Cable TV Franchise Community Services Distdct General Telephone Southern California Edison Company Southern California Gas Company Fish & Game Army Corps of Engineers 33. The Developer shall construct the following public improvements to City of Temecula General Plan standards unless otherwise noted. Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works: Improve Verde Lane (Principal Collector Highway Standards - 78' R/W) to include dedication of full-width street right-of-way, installation of full-width street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer). bo Improve Streets A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, Camino Campos Verdes, Sanderling Way and Stading Street (Local Road Standards - 60' R/W) to include dedication of full-width street right-of-way, installation of full-width street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer). c. Install a traffic signal at the intersections of Margarita RoadNerde Lane and R:~STAFFRPT~323pa98pc..doc 4O North General Kearny Road/Camino Campos Verdes to include signal interconnect with the signal(s) at the intersection(s) of Margarita Road, North General Kearny Road. Design shall also include a warrant analysis for the signals and if warrants are met, shall be installed by the Developer. The Developer is eligible for .Development Impact Fee Cr;~ii~for 50% cost of design and construction of the traffic-signal at Margarita RoadNerde Lane. A School Zone signing and stdping plan, per Caltrans standards, shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer for the school site within this project and included with the street improvement plans for the project. Design shall also include a warrant analysis for a flashing yellow beacon and if warrants are met, shall be installed by the Developer. Unless otherwise approved the following minimum criteria shall be observed in the design of the street improvement plans: ao Street centerline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over A.C. paving. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City Standard Nos. 207, 207A and/or 208. Street lights shall be installed along the public streets shall be designed in accordance with Ordinance No. 461. Concrete sidewalks shall be constructed in accordance with City Standard Nos. 400 and 401. eo Design of street improvements shall extend a minimum of 300 feet beyond the project boundaries to ensure adequate continuity of design with adjoining properties. f. Minimum centedine radii shall be in accordance with City standard No. 113. g. All reverse curves shall include a 100-foot minimum tangent section. h. All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees. All units shall be provided with zero clearance garage doors and garage door openers if the driveway is less than 18 feet in depth from back of sidewalk. Landscaping shall be limited in the comer cut-off area of all intersections and adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility. All concentrated drainage directed towards the public street shall be conveyed through curb outlets per City Standard No. 301. I. All utility systems including gas, electric, telepl~one, water, sewer, and cable TV shall be provided underground. Easements shall be provided as required where R:~STAFFRPT'~323pa98pc..doc 41 Department of Public Works. Prior to Issuance of Building Permits 43. A Precise Grading Plan shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval. The building pad shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer for location and elevation, and the Soils Engineer shall issue a Final Soils Report addressing compaction and site conditions. 44. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, the approved grading plan, the conditions of the .grading permit, City Grading Standards and accepted grading construction practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved rough grading plan. 45. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06. Prior to Issuance of Certificates of Occupancy 46. Upon the first Certificate of Occupancy, the Developer shall design and install a fully actuated 8-phase traffic signal at the intersection of Margarita Road and Verde Lane in accordance with City Standards. This signal shall be coordinated with the existing traffic signal at the intersection of Winchester Road and Margarita Road and the proposed traffic signal at the intersection of Margarita Road and North General Keamey Road. The developer shall also be responsible for installation of interconnect conduits, cable and timing plans. 47. The Developer is eligible to receive credits for the Traffic Signals and Traffic Control Systems component of the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee for 50% of the ultimate cost for the design and installation of the traffic signal at the intersection of Margarita Road and Verdes Lane. 48. 49. Upon the first Certificate of Occupancy, the existing Memorandum of Understanding between the City and Caltrans dated October 13, 1995 shall be amended to allow a dght in/right out vehicular movement onto Winchester Road. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: Rancho California Water District Eastern Municipal Water District c. Department of Public Works d. Caltrans 50. All necessary certifications and clearances from engineers, utility companies and public agencies shall be submitted as required by the Department of Public Works. R:~STAFFRPTX67 PA99(PM)DH.doc 8 88. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development ImP~ required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal~ic. inal C-~dA "~tCode and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06. Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy 89. Design and install a fully actuated 8-phase traffic signal at the intersection of Margarita Road and Verde Lane in accordance with City Standards. This signal shall be coordinated with the existing traffic signal at the intersection of Winchester Road and Margarita Road and the proposed traffic signal at the intersection of Margarita Road and North General Kearney Road. The developer shall also be responsible for installation of interconnect conduits, cable and timing plans. (Added by the Planning Commission on April 7, 1999). 90. The Developer is eligible to receive credit for the Traffic Signals and Traffic Control Systems component of the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee for 50% of the ultimate cost for the design and installation of the traffic signal at the intersection of Margarita Road and Verdes Lane. (Added by the Planning C. ommission on April 7, 1999). 91. Improve Campos Verdes Lane (Principal Collector Highway Standards - 78' R/W) to include dedication of half-width street right-of-way plus six feet, installation of half-width street improvements plus six feet, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer). (Added by the Planning Commission on April 7, t999). 92. The existing Memorandum of Understanding between the City and Caltrans dated October 13, 1995 shall be amended to allow a right in/right out vehicular movement onto Winchester Road. 93. As deemed necessary by the Depadment of Public Works, the Developer shall receive. written clearance from the following agencies: a. Rancho California Water District b. Eastern Municipal Water District c. Department of Public Works 94. Corner property line cut off shall be required per Riverside County Standard No. 805. 95. All public improvements, shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and City standards to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works. 96. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works. R:\STAFFRP'r~38pa99(recvd )STAFF REPORT,doc 22 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ITEM 1 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT JUNE 26, 200t A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Community Services District was called to order at 7:37 P.M., at the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. President Stone presiding. ROLL CALL PRESENT: 5 DIRECTORS: ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: Comerchero, Naggar, Pratt, Roberts, Stone None Also present were General Manager Nelson, City Attorney Thorson, and City Clerk Jones. PUBLIC COMMENTS No input. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of April 24, 2001; 1.2 Approve the minutes of May 15, 2001; 1.3 Approve the minutes of May 22, 2001. 2 Completion and Acceptance of Rancho California Sports Park Field Liqhting - Proiect No. PW00-19CSD RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Accept the project Rancho California Sports Park Field Lighting - Project No. PW00-19CSD as complete; 2.2 Authorize the Clerk to file the Notice of Completion; 2.3 Accept the Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract. (Director Naggar abstained with regard to this matter.) Minutes.csd\062601 1 3 4 Award of Construction Contract for the Mary Phillips Senior Center Expansion Project - Project No. PW99-19 RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Award a contract for the Mary Phillips Senior Center Expansion Project - Project No. PW99-19 - to R. Moody Construction for $508,500.00 and authorize the President to execute the contract; 3.2 Authorize the General Manager to approve Change orders not to exceed the Contingency amount of $50,850.00 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount; 3.3 Approve the project plans and specifications. First Amendment to the Restroom Maintenance Services Contract with Self's Janitorial Service for Fiscal Year 2001-02 RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Approve Amendment No. 1 to the Restroom Maintenance Services Contract with Self's Janitorial Service to extend the Agreement to June 30, 2002; 4.2 Authorize the expenditure of funds in the amount of $48,720.00 for restroom cleaning services and park gazebo cleaning services; 4.3 Approve a contingency of 10% in the amount in the amount of $4,872.00 for extra work items. In response to Director Stone's request to ensure a comprehensive participation of all maintenance companies, the contract was approved on a month-to-month basis and that staff proceed with a RFP process. 5 Acceptance of Offers of Dedication from Temeku Hills Properties, LLC, and Mc Millin Companies, LLC, for maintenance of slopes and perimeter landscaping within Tract Nos. 23371-9 and 23371-10 RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. CSD 0t-t4 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ACCEPTING THE OFFERS OF DEDICATION FROM TEMEKU HILLS PROPERTIES, LLC, AND MC MILLIN COMPANIES, LLC, FOR EASEMENTS FOR MAINTENANCE OF SLOPES AND PERIMETER LANDSCAPING IN TRACT NOS. 23371-9 AND 2337'1-10 Minutes.csd\062601 2 6 Agreement for Softba Officiating Serv ces RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Approve the agreement between the City of Temecula and the Margarita Officials Association for providing City softball league officiating services from July 1, 2001, through July 30, 2005, with a fifth-year option to renew. 7 Professional Services Agreement for TCSD Landscape Plan Check and Inspection Services RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Approve a Professional Services Agreement with PELA, a landscape architectural firm, for TCSD landscape plan check and inspection services in the amount of $80,000 and authorize the Board President to execute the agreement; 7.2 Authorize the General Manager to approve additional services not to exceed the Contingency amount of $8,000 which is equal to 10% of the agreement amount. It was noted that, as per supplemental material, Section 9 b. (4) of this agreement should amended to reflect $1 million professional liability coverage per claim and in aggregate versus $2 million. MOTION: Director Comerchero moved to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1-7 (Item No. 4 as amended). The motion was seconded by Director Roberts and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Director Naggar who abstained with regard to Item No. 2. DISTRICT BUSINESS 8 Naming of the Paseo del Sol Park Site RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 Approve the name Meadows Park as recommended by the Community Services Commission as the name for the five-acre park site located on Meadows Parkway in the Paseo del Sol Development. Development Services Administrator McCarthy provided the staff report (as per agenda material), noting that this would be park no. 27 for the City. MOTION: Director Comerchero moved to approve staff recommendation. The motion was seconded by Director Roberts and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. 9 Naminq of the Temecula Children's Museum RECOMMENDATION: 9.1 Approve Imagination Workshop as the name for the new Temecula Children's Museum. Minutes.csd~062601 3 Community Services Director Parker presented the staff report (of record). Director Comerchero relayed his and the Children's Museum Project Design Committee's delight with the proposed name of Imagination Workshop the Temecula Children's Museum as well as the overall project. MOTION: Director Naggar moved to approve staff recommendation. The motion was seconded by Director Comerchero and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. 10 Water Park Feasibility Study RECOMMENDATION: 10.1 Receive and file the findings of the Water Park Feasibility Study. Development Services Administrator McCarthy highlighted the staff report (as per agenda material) and introduced Mr. Roger Dale of Natelson Company who proceeded with an overview of the findings of the feasibility study for a water park in the City of Temecula and advised that the Natelson Company was retained to complete the feasibility study of such a park, not to design the facility or to depict specific site locations, commenting on the following: · Potential size and preferred components · Estimated construction development costs · Potential on-going Operations and Maintenance costs/revenue · Operational structure (public/private/public land) · Community SurveyNVorkshop · Hypothetical concepts In closing, Mr. Dale expressed appreciation to the Project Committee (comprised of Directors Comerchero and Naggar) for their efforts and noted that, to his knowledge, there are approximately 1,000 water park in the United States; that approximately 50~50 are public/private ownership; and that liability insurance is approximately 10% of the annual operating cost. Commenting on the citizens' desire for such a water park facility, Director Naggar thanked the City Council for authorizing the completion of this feasibility study and noted that he will continue to explore the potential of such a facility in the City. MOTION: Director Roberts moved to receive and file the report. The motion was seconded by Director Naggar and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. DEPARTMENTAL REPORT No additional input. Minutes.csd\062601 4 DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT Welcoming the community, including the City's new Vail Ranch residents, Community Services Director Parker invited the public to the Annexation Celebration on Sunday, July 2, 2001, at 2:00 P.M. to 5:00 P.M. at the Vail Ranch Middle School. Mr. Parker as well invited the public to the upcoming Fourth of July Festivities. GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT General Manager Nelson noted that information with regard to Annexation Celebration as well as the Fourth of July Festivities are on the City's Website. BOARD OF DIRECTORS' REPORTS No comments. ADJOURNMENT At 8:03 P.M., the Temecula Community Services District meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, July 10, 2001, at 7:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Jeffrey E. Stone, President ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk/District Secretary [SEAL] Minutes.csd\062601 5 ITEM 2 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY CITY MANAGER TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: General Manager/Board of Directors Genie Roberts, Director of Financ~'~ July 24, 2001 Financial Statements for the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2001 PREPARED BY: Tim McDermott, Assistant Finance Director;~ Pascale Brown, Senior Accountant %~ RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors receive and file the Financial Statements for the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2001. DISCUSSION: The attached financial statements reflect the unaudited activity of the Community Services District for the Nine months ended March 31, 2001. Please see the attached financial statements for an analytical review of financial activity. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: Combining Balance Sheet as of March 31, 2001 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance for the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2001 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT Combining Balance Sheet as of March 31, 2001 and the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance For The Nine Months Ended March 31, 2001 (Unaudited) Prepared by the Finance Department Temecula Community Services District C oral,ming Balance Sheet As of March 31, 2001 Cash and investments Receivables Due fi.om other funds Total assets Parks & SerYlce Ser~me Service Recreation Level A Level B Level C 742,277 12,230 19,220 $ 25,459 $ 312,001 541 4,650 $ 773,727. $ $ 26,000 $ 316,651 Liabilities and fund balances: Liabilities: Other currant liabilities Fund balances: Reserved Designated Total fund balances Total liabilities and fund balances $ 132,056 132,056 337,963 303,708 63 $ 38,280 63 38,280 641,671 $ 773,727 $ 105,111 25,937 173,260 25,937 278,371 $ 26,000 $ 316,651 Please note that these balances are unau~Yxted Temecula Community Services District Combining Balance Sheet As of March 31, 2001 Assets: Cash and investments Receivables Due from other funds Total asse~ Service Service Debt Level D Level R Service Total 236,189 $ 15,487 $ 623,175 $ 1,954,588 2,978 242 20,641 19,220 239,167 $ 15,729 $ 623,175 $ 1,994,449 Liabilities and fund balances: Liabilities: Other current liabilities Fund balances: Reserved Designated Total fund balances Total liabilities and fund balances $ 1,341 . $ 171,740 1,341 171,740 150 965 502,690 946,879 237,676 14,764 120,485 875,830 237,826 15,729 623,175 1,822,709 $ 239,167 $ 15,729 $ 623,175 $ 1,994,449 Please note that these balances are unaudited Temecula Community Services District City~ide Operations Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2001 Annual Amended YTD Budget Activity Total Percent Encumbr. Activity of Budget Special tax $ 2,486,100 $ 1,221,810 TCSD admin fee credit/"REST" 1,729,000 1,296,750 Recreation programs 536,700 357,689 Investment interest 40,000 35,024 Miscellaneous 168,900 100,134 Operating transfer in 44,200 39,343 Total Revenues 5,004,900 3,050,750 Expenditures: $ 1,221,810 1,296,750 357,689 35,024 100,134 39,343 3,050,750 Parks, medians and arterial street lighting 3,237,601 2,060.302 287,385 2,347,687 Seniors 146,800 77,056 3,798 80,854 Community Recreation Center (CRC) 345,670 234,267 12,505 246,772 Recreation programs 327,210 194,144 8,029 202,173 Temecula Community Center (TCC) 143,780 81,910 6,002 87,912 Museum 176.300 110,488 6,193 116,681 Aquatics 249,380 139,153 7,305 146,458 Sports 169,230 86,669 6,746 93,415 Operating transfers out 568,000 567,182 567,182 Total Expenffltures Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 2000 49% (1) 75% 67% 88% 59% 89% 61% 73% 55% (2) 71% 62% 61% 66% 59% (3) 55% (3) 100% 5,363,971 3,551,171 337,963 3,889,134 73% (359,071) (500321) 1,142,092 1,142,092 Ending Fund Balance, March 31, 2001 $ 783,021 $ 641,671 Notes: (1) Special tax revenue is primarily received in January and May each fiscal year. (2) The variance is due to savings in personnel costs and fac'flity rehabilitation costs. (3) The variances are due to seasonal program activity. Temecula Community Services District Service Level A Arterial Street Lights and Median Maintenance Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2001 Special tax Miscellaneous Total Revenues Expenditures: Operating Transfers Out Total Expenditures Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 2000 Ending Fund Balance, March 31, 2001 Annual Amended YTD Budl~et Activity Encumbr. Total Activity $ 44,200 $ 39,343 44,200 39,343 (44,200) (39,343) 39,343. 39,343 $ (4,857) 5; Percent of Budget 39,343 39,343 Note: All activity in Service level A is now recorded in the Ciiywide Operations Fund. Temecula Community Services District Service Level B Residential Street Lights Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2001 Annual Amended YTD Budl~et Activity Assessments $ 348,400 $ 180,723 Investment interest 2,000 1,412 Street lighting fees 15,600 11,370 Miscellaneous I2,000 500 Total Revenues 378,000 194,005 Expenditures: Salaries & wages 3,150 1,846 Street lighting 345,000 262,063 Miscellaneous 19,700 2,233 Total Expenditures 367,850 266,142 Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures 10,150 (72,137) Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 2000 98,074 98,074 Ending Fund Balanec, March 31,2001 $ 108,224 $ 25,937. Eneumbr. Total Activity $ 180,723 1,412 11,370 500 194,005 1,846 262,063 2,233 266,142 of Budg~ 52% 71% 73% 4% 51% 59% 76% 11% 72% (1) Notes: (1) Special tax revenue is primarily received in January and May each fiscal year. Temecula Community Services District Service Level C Perimeter Landscaping end Slope Maintenence Statement of Revenues, Expenditures end Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2001 Annual Amended YTD Total Budget Activity Encumbr. Activity Assessments $ 559,800 $ 289,004 $ 289,004 Investment interest 19,000 14,492 14,492 Plan check and inspections 25,000 11,610 11,610 Miscelleneous 12,000 500 500 Total Revenues 615,800 315,606 315,606 Expenditures: of Budget 52%(1) 76% 46% 4% 51% Salaries and wages 120,820 68,464 68,464 57% Landscape maintenance and rehab 360,900 247,426 91,337 338,763 94% (2) Utilities 138,100 95,556 95,556 69% Other expenditures 85,330 26,776 13,774 40,550 48% (3) Total Expenditures 705,150 438,222 105,111 543,333 77% Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 2000 Ending Fund Balance, March 31, 2001 (89,350) (122,616) 400,987 400,987 $ 311,637 $ 278,371 (1) Assessments are primarily received in January and May each fiscal year. (2) The variance is primarily due to enncumbrences that are recorded for lendscape maintenance services for the entire year. (3) The variance is primarily due to lower than anticipated slope repair and maintenence costs being incurred. Temecula Community Services District Service Level D Refuse Collection, Recycling and Street Sweeping Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2001 Annual Amended YTD Total Budget Activity Enenmbr. Activity Assessments $ 2,597,960 $ 1,319,307 Grants 14,300 14,279 Investment interest 19,000 11,799 Miscellaneous 5,000 5,000 Total Revenues 2,636,260 1,350,385 Expenditures: Salaries and wages Refuse hauling Other expenditures Total Expenditures Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures (20,900) 42,313 Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 2000 195,513 195,513 Ending Fund Balance, March 31,2001 $ 174,613 $ 237,826 $ 1,319,307 14,279 11,799 5,000 1,350,385 24,990 16,058 16,058 2,597,960 1,275,218 1,275,218 34,210 16,796 $ 150 16,946 2,657,160 1,308,072 150 1,308,222 P~cunt of Budget 51%0) 100% 62% 100% 51% 64% 49% (2) 50% 49% Notes: (1) Assessments are primarily received in January and May each fiscal year. (2) Refuse hauling payments are made semi-annually (in Januau and June). Temecula Community Services District Service Level R Streets and Roads Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2001 Annual Amended YTD Budget Activity Assessments $ 11,600 $ 6,420 Investment interest 500 777 Total Revenues 12,100 7,197 Expenditures: Emergancy street mffmtenance 17,080 9,035 $ Other expenditures 80 47 Total Expenditures 17,160 9,082 Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures (5,060) ( 1,885) Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 2000 17,614 17,614 Ending Fund Balance, March 31.2001 $ 12,554 $ 15,729 Encumbr. Total Activity of Budget $ 6,420 55% 777 155% 965 7,197 965 10,000 47 10,047 59% 59% 59% 59% (1) Notes: (1) Assessments are primarily received in Janua~ and May each fiscal year. Temecula Community Services District Debt Service Fund Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2001 Operating transfers in Investment interest Total Revenues Expenditures: Debt service - principal Debt ser~ce - interest Other expencYatures Total Expenditures Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 2000 Ending Fund Balance, March 31, 2001 Annual Amended Total Budl~et Activity $ 463,000 $ 462,182 35,600 8,773 498,600 470,955 210,000 210,000 281,700 143,983 6,300 5~65 498,000 359~48 600 111,507 511,668 511,668 $ 512~68 $ 623,175 Percent of Budget 100% 25% (1) 100% 51% 87% 72% (2) (1) The variance is due to semi-annual interest on the reserve fund investment agreement that is paid in October & April each year. (2) Semi-annual debt senSce paymets are made in October and April each year. 9 ITEM 3 AP PROVAI-~I~,,.~ CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE DIRECTO R_.~ CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT Board of Directors Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Service~-~.. July 24, 2001 Arts Council Community Grant Agreement PREPARED BY: Phyllis L. Ruse, Deputy Director of Community Services RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors approve the Community Grant Agreement between the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) and the Arts Council of Temecula Valley in the amount of $40,000. BACKGROUND: The Arts Council of Temecula Valley has been providing a variety of arts and cultural activities in the City of Temecula for several years. Some of their events include the annual Arts Festival and also the Concert on the Green program. The Arts Council worked extensively with City staff and AMS Planning and Research in the development of the City's Cultural. Arts Master Plan. By way of this agreement, the Arts Council commits to continue the implementation process for the Cultural Arts Master Plan. TCSD staff and the Arts Council have agreed upon goals and objectives that the Arts Council will implement by the end of this fiscal year as part of this agreement. Some of these goals include: providing opportunities for arts education in the schools and the overall community, generating a general awareness and participation in arts and cultural programs through media and promotional materials, and also encouraging and fostering cooperation among cultural organizations and individual artists in Temecula. This agreement provides $40,000 in funding for the purpose of continuing and enhancing cultural arts programs in the City of Temecula. The Arts Council will submit an invoice to the TCSD at the end of each calendar quarter for the actual costs of personnel, which will be accompanied by appropriate documentation. FISCAL IMPACT: Funding in the amount of $40,000 is appropriated in the TCSD budget for FY 2001-02 for the Arts Council program. These funds are available in account 190-180-999- 5286. R:\RUSEP~AGENDAS~2001-02 Arts Council G-ant Agreement.doc COMMUNITY GRANT AGREEMENT BETVVEEN THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AND THE ARTS COUNCIL OF TEMECULA VALLEY THIS AGREEMENT is made by and between the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD), a municipal corporation, and the Arts Council of Temecula Valley, a non-profit corporation, and is dated as of July 24, 2001. In consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. This Agreement is made with respect to the following facts and purposes, which each of the parties hereto acknowledge and agree to be true and correct: a. The Arts Council of Temecula Valley ("Arts Council") coordinates many programs for the cultural arts within the City of Temecula, which are not provided by the TCSD's recreation and cultural arts program. b. The Arts Council warrants and represents to the TCSD that it is a non-profit, tax exempt corporation under the tax laws of the United State and California, and agrees to continue in such status during the term of this Agreement. b. The Board of Directors desires to award a community grant to the Arts Council in the amount of forty thousand dollars ($40,000.00) for the purpose of continuing and enhancing its cultural arts programs within the City of Temecula. The Board of Directors hereby allocates $40,000 for the costs of personnel working for the Arts Council for fiscal year 2001-2002. c. This Agreement provides for the manner in which the grant will be paid to the Arts Council. 2. The TCSD shall pay to the Arts Council on a quarterly basis, an amount equal to the actual costs for employees of the Arts Council for the preceding quarter, not to exceed $10,000.00 per quarter or $40,000.00 for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2002. Arts Council shall submit an invoice to the TCSD at the end of each calendar quarter for the actual costs of personnel, which shall be accompanied by such documentation as reasonably required by the Director of Finance to establish that such costs were incurred by the Arts Council. TCSD shall pay the invoice or provide its written objections to it within thirty (30) working days following receipt by the TCSD. 3. The term of this agreement shall be July 1, 2001 to June 30, 2002. 4. The Arts Council and TCSD staff have developed goals and objectives which are set forth in Exhibit A. The Arts Council is committed to implementing these Goals and Objectives and assisting the TCSD in implementing the City's Cultural Arts Master Plan. 5. The TCSD may at any time, for any breach of this Agreement, suspend or terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the Arts Council at least ten (10) days prior written notice. If the breach is corrected during this ten-day period, TCSD may, in its sole and exclusive discretion, rescind the termination. If the TCSD suspends or R:\RUSEP\CONTRACT~2.001-02 Ar~s Council Community Grant Agreement.doc terminates a podion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement. Arts Council shall make available to the TCSD its books, records and financial documents in such form as to allow TCSD to verify Arts Council's compliance with the terms of this Agreement. 6. The Arts Council agrees to defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless the City, TCSD, its officers, officials, and employees from and against any and all claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, including attorney fees and expert witness fees, or liability of any kind or nature which the City, its officers, agents and employees may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of Arts Council's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions arising out of or in any way related to the performance or non-performance of this Agreement, excepting only liability attributable to the active negligence of the City. 7. Arts Council shall procure and maintain, or shall have provided on its behalf, for the duration of fiscal year 2001-2002 insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the activities of the Arts Council, its agents, representatives, or employees. a. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as: (1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability form No. CG 00 01 11 85 or 88, including a non-owned auto endorsement. (2) Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Employer's Liability Insurance. Workers Compensation Insurance shall not be required if the Arts Council has no employees. b. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Arts Council shall maintain limits on the policies described in Subsection a. of no less than the following amounts unless otherwise approved by the City Manager: (1) General Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. (2) Workers' Compensation as required by the State; Employer's Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury or disease. c. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentir~n,s. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City Manager. d. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability policies shall contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions: (1) The City, TCSD, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Arts Council; premises owned, occupied or used by the Arts Council; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by R:\RUSEP\CONTRACT~2001-02 Arts Council Community Grant Agreement.doc the Arts Council. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers. (2) For any claims related to this Agreement, the Arts Council's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insured maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be excess of the Arts Council's insurance and shall not contribute with it. (3) Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers. (4) The Arts Council's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. (5) ' Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, cancelled by either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days' prior written notice to the City by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the City. e. " . Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. Self insurance shall not be considered to comply with these insurance requirements. f. - ' . Arts Council shall furnish the City with original endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be on forms provided by the City. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. As an alternative to the City's forms, the Arts Council's insurer may provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements effecting the coverage required by these specifications. 8. Arts Council is and shall at all times remain as to the City and TCSD a wholly independent contractor. The personnel pert'orming the services under this Agreement on behalf of Arts Council shall at all times be under Arts Council's exclusive direction and control. Neither City nor any of its officers, employees or agents shall have control over the conduct of Arts Council or any of Arts Council's officers, employees or agents, except as set forth in this Agreement. Arts Council shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. Arts Council shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any manner. 9. Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (i) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice. Notice R:\RUSEP\CONTRACT~2001-02 Arts Council Community Grant Agreement.doc shall be effective upon delivery to the addresses specified below or on the third business day following deposit with the document delivery service or United States Mail as provided above. To City: City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, California 92589-9033 Attention: City Manager To Arts Council: Arts Council of Temecula Valley P.O. Box 2337 Temecula, California 92593 Attention: Martha Minkler Executive Director 10. The Arts Council shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of the City or TCSD. 11. This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or contemporaneous agi-eements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. R:\RUSEP\CONTRACT~2001-02 Arts Council Community Grant Agreement.doc IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF TEMECULA Attest: Jeffrey Stone, President Temecula Community Services District Susan Jones, CMC City Clerk Approved As to Form: Peter M. Thorson City Attorney ARTS COUNCIL OF TEMECULA VALLEY, a California non-profit corporation By: Name: Title: By: Name: Title: R:\RUSEP\CONTRACT\2001-02 Arts Council Community Grant Agreement.doc OF THE TEMECULA VALLEY POST OFFICE BOX2337 ~ TEMECULA, CA 92593 ~ 909.695.2787 ~ FAX 909.695.9438 ~ email:temarts~pe.net BOARD OF TRUSTEES July 1, 2001 Albert and Grace Ball Maryann and Tom Edwards Sally Haserot Barbara Keen Teresa Lubrani Patricia Lusln Joan Lynn Dorothy Meyler Mark Mush Steve Phelps Bruce Singer Paula Stankovich Janet Tosches Dr. Alan Winkelsteln CONSULTANTS Fred Lamb Jim Meyler Angels Morris Stewart M. Morris, Jr. Karen Parrott Aliceu Wong EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Martha N. Minkler Mr. Herman Parker, Director Community Services Department City of Temecula Post Office Box 9033 Temecula, California 92589-9033 RE: MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BY AND BETWEEN THE ARTS COUNCIL OF TEMECULA VALLEY AND THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR PHASE THREE OF IMPLEMENTATION OF CULTURAL ARTS MASTER PLAN Dear Herman, The Arts Council of Temecula Valley has accepted the responsibility given to it by the City of Temecula to implement the Cultural Arts Master Plan. Working cooperatively with the City of Temecula, the Arts Council is positioned to move forward during fiscal year 2001-2002 to continue implementing additional objectives of five of the goals outlined in the Cultural Arts Master Plan. The Council, having facilitated the formation of the Temecula Valley Historical Society, will continue to assist the newly formed Society with preserving the historic legacy of Temecula Valley. The six goals, as outlined by the Plan, include providing opportunities for arts education in schools and the community, generating greater awareness and participation in arts and cultural programs, enhancing the community through art in public places, assisting encouraging and fostering cooperation among cultural organizations and individual arts in Temccula Valley, developing performing and visual arts facilities, and preserving the historic legacy of Temecula Valley. GOALS: ARTS IN EDUCATION: TO PROVIDE OPPORTUNITIES FOR ARTS EDUCATION IN SCHOOLS AND THE OVERALL COMMUNITY. OBJECTIVES: A. Coordinate efforts with Temecula Valley Unified School District to provide an after school arts program at a local middle school. 1. Continue researching public and private monies to fund the program. 2. Program operational by Spring of 2002. B. Work with local parents interested in forming ~booster' clubs for the arts in local schools. Clubs would help fund arts opportunities for local students. C. Write grant requests to private Foundations and corporations to underwrite fifth annual Youth Summer Art Institute at Temecula Valley High School. Institute provides individual instruction for up to 120 students, nominated by school district art teachers, for four one-week sessions dur/ng the summer. Goal is to increase space availability so more children can participate. Requests completed by December 2001. D. Distribute information from regional, state or national programs which would encourage local students to showcase their talent either in a competition or recognition venue. E. Co-sponsor with Temecula Valley Unified School District, third annual Youth Art Exhibition. F. Research proposal of school district music teacher to start an all-City youth band. G. Research organizing and sponsoring arts camps for children in summer of 2002. II. PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT: TO GENERATE GREATER AWARENESS AND PARTICIPATION IN ARTS AND CULTURAL PROGRAMS. TCSD DEPARTMENTAL REPORT APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINAI~E_ CITY MANAGER , Yf¢,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,~ ~ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: Board of Directors Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Service~ July 24, 2001 SUBJECT: Departmental Report PREPARED BY: Gall L. Zigler, Administrative Secretary On December 1, 1999, staff released a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for a Citywide Multi-Trail System. Interviews were held on February 14, 2000 and the committee selected KTU& Associates as the top ranked firm. The Board of Directors awarded a contract to KTU&A on Mamh 28, 2000. A trails questionnaire was mailed out to the residents in mid-September with approximately 450 responses returned. Staff is currently reviewing draft document. Staff released a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for the design of an aquatic facility to be constructed at Chaparral High School. The Board of Directors approved a Scope of Services Agreement on December 7, 1999, with the number one ranked firm, RJM Design Group. The architect and project design committee has completed the schematic design of the project. The Board of Directors approved the Master Plan on June 27, 2000, and awarded a contract to RJM Design Group on July 11,2000, for the Phase II of the Design Contract. A bid opening was held on July 3, 2001 and City Council awarded a contract to California Commercial Pools on July 10, 2001. A pre-construction meeting is scheduled for July 24, 2001 and staff anticipates construction to begin in early August. Staff released a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for the design of a sports complex to be constructed in the City. Statements of Qualifications were received on February 16, 2000, and interviews were held of the four top ranked firms on March 28, 2000. A design contract was awarded to RJM Design Group at the May 23, 2000, Board of Directors meeting. The first sub- committee was held on November 7, 2000. With the adoption of the Wolf Creek Specific Plan at the January 23, 2001 City Council meeting, it has been determined the 40 acre sports park will be located in the Wolf Creek development. A community workshop was held on April 7, 2001, and the architect is drafting a plan based on the information compiled from the workshop and the sports league questionnaires. A committee meeting was held on July 10, 2001 to review the final conceptual plan. The Master Plan will go forward to the Community Services Commission and the City Council. R:~ZIGL ERG~(DEPTRPT~0701 .do~ July 19, 2001 The Master Plan for the Temecula Public Library was adopted at the September 26, 2000 City Council Meeting. Staff has negotiated a contract with LPA for the final construction documents and specifications for the Temecula Public Library. LPA submitted the construction documents for second plan check. Staff released an RFQ for the children's museum interior space planning, exhibit design, fabrication, construction and installation. Interviews were held of the four top ranked firms on October 17, 2000. Staff began negotiations with the top ranked firm, Sparks Exhibits and Environments. The Agreement and Scope of Services was approved by the City Council on December 12, 2000. The committee has been meeting and has proposed naming the facility "Imagination Workshop, The Temecula Children's Museum". A staff report went forward to the Community Services Commission on May 14, 2001, and they unanimously approved a recommendation to the City Council to name the facility. A meeting was held on July 5, 2001 to review the preliminary conceptual plans. A new storyline was presented and well received by all present. Design is underway for this new concept. The Development Services Division continues to participate in the development review for projects within the City including Wolf Creek, Roripaugh and Harveston, as well as overseeing the development of parks and recreation facilities, and the contract for refuse and recycling and assessment administration. The Maintenance Division continues to oversee the maintenance of parks and recreation facilities, as well as all other City owned public buildings and facilities. In addition, the Maintenance Division assists in all aspects of Citywide special events. The Recreation Division successfully coordinated several special events this past month. On July 1, 2001 the Vail Ranch Annexation Celebration was held at Vail Ranch Middle School. The festivities included guest speakers, free food, live entertainment, jolly jumps, and rock climbing. Representatives from all City departments were present to meet, greet and answer questions of the Vail Ranch residents. On July 4, the Community Services Department held their annual 4th of July festivities including the annual parade through Old Town and the fireworks festivities at the Rancho California Sports Park. The TCSD is currently operating their annual summer swim lessons and public swim program, summer day camp program, the Rec Rocks program and the S.M.A.R.T. program. The S.M.A.R.T. program has been very well received by the community and staff continues to receive many positive comments from those families who are participating in the program. The Recreation Division is currently planning the free August Summer Concert Series to be held Thursday evenings at the Community Recreation Center's Thomas H. Langley Amphitheater. A variety of bands will be playing every Thursday during the month of August from 6:30 - 8:00 pm. R:~Z [GLERG'Off)EPTRPT~0701 .doc July 19, 2001 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ITEM 1 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY JUNE 26, 200t A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency was called to order at 8:04 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula. ROLL CALL PRESENT: 5 AGENCY MEMBERS: Comercherol Naggar, Pratt, Stone, Roberts ABSENT: 0 AGENCY MEMBER: None Also present were Executive Director Nelson, City Attorney Thorson, and City Clerk Jones. PUBLIC COMMENTS No input. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of April 24, 2001; 1.2 Approve the minutes of May 15, 2001 1.3 Approve the minutes of May 22, 2001 MOTION: Agency Member Comerchero moved to approve Consent Calendar Item No. 1. The motion was seconded by Agency Member Naggar and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. DEPARTMENTAL REPORT No additional input. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT No comment. AGENCY MEMBERS' REPORTS No comments. R:\Minutes.rda\062601 1 ADJOURNMENT At 8:04 P.M., the Temecula Redevelopment Agency meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, July 10, 2001, in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecuta, California. Ron Roberts, Chairman ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk/Agency Secretary [SEAL] R:\Minutes.rda\062601 2 ITEM 2 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE DIRECTO~~ CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA REPORT Executive Director/Redevelopment Agency Members Genie Roberts, Director of Finance ~ July 24, 2001 Financial Statements for the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2001 PREPARED BY: Tim McDermott, Assistant Finance Director~t~'' Pascale Brown, Senior Accountant ~ RECOMMENDATION: That the Agency Members receive and file the Financial Statements for the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2001. DISCUSSION: The attached financial statements reflect the unaudited activity of the Redevelopment Agency for the Nine months ended March 31,2001. Please see the attached financial statements for an analytical review of financial activity. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: Combining Balance Sheet as of March 31, 2001 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance for the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2001 TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Combining Balance Sheet as of March 31, 2001 and the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance For The Nine Months Ended March 31, 2001 (Unaudited) Prepared by the Finance Department Temecula Redevelopment Agency Combining Balance Sheet As of March 31, 2001 Assets: Cash and investments Receivables Land held for resale Low/Mod Redevelopment Debt Fund Fund Service Total $ 4,853,831 $ 2,025,610 $ 2,006,312 $ 8,885,753 1,795,271 361,887 133,738 2,290,896 2,103,053 2,103,053 Total assets $ 6,649,102 $ 4,490,550 $ 2,140,050 $ 13,279,702 Liabilities and fund balances: Liabilities: Other current liabilities $ 51,266 $ 649,185 $ 1,250 $ 701,701 Deferred revenue 845,405 162,059 1,007,464 Total lial/flitias 896,671 811,244 1,250 1,709,165 Fund balances: Reserved 5,752,431 3,279,758 $ 1,448,920 10,481,109 Designated 399,548 689,880 1,089,428 Total fired balances 5,752,431 3,679,306 2,138,800 11,570,537 Total liabilities and fund balances $ 6,649,102 $ 4,490,550 $ 2,140,050 $ 13,279,702 Please note that these balmtces are unaudited City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency Statement of Revanues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual Redevelopment Agency Low/Moderate Income Housing For the Nine Months Ended March 3l, 2001 Annual Amended YTD Budget Activity Property tax increment $ 1,765,000 $ 894,406 Investment interest 280,000 202,040 Rental income 2,000 6,042 Miscellaneous 7,200 7,378 Total Revenues 2,054,200 1,109,866 Total Percent Encumbr. Activity of Budget $ 894,406 202,040 6,042 7,378 1,109,866 51% (1) 72% 302% 102% 54% Expenditures: Salaries and wages 215,320 Operating and administrative expenditures 295,460 Homebuyer programs 300,000 Residential rehabilitation programs 1,058,680 Housing development & acquisition 4,000,000 Affordable housing / future obligation 305,000 Total Expenditures Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures Beginning Fund Balance, July 1, 2000 Ending Fund Balance, March 31, 2001 119,146 119,146 130,985 $ 31,934 162,919 24,000 24,000 165,870 18~42 184,312 36,549 36,549 305.000 305,000 55% 55% (2) 8% 17% 1% (3) 100% 6,174,460 781,550 50,376 831,926 13% (4,120,260) 328,316 5,424,115 5,424,115 $ 1,303,855 $ 5,752,431 Notes: (1) Property tax increment revenue is received in January and May each fiscal year. (2) The variance in operating and administrative expenditures is primarily due to lower than anticipated legal and consulting costs being incurred. (3) Minimal costs have been incurred to date on the Senior Housing and Pujol Neighborhood Housing projects. City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual Redevelopment Agency- Redevelopment For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2001 Annual Amended YTD Budget Activity Investment interest $ 140,000 $ 131.698 Rental income 64,000 78,393 Loan interest 15,200 11,755 Reimbursements 1,392,316 587,988 Operating transfers in 955,000 955,000 Total Revenues 2,566,516 1,764,834 Total Percent Encumbr. Activity of Budget $ 131,698 78,393 11,755 587,988 955,000 1.764,834 Capital Projects (4): Public Restrooms Adjacent to O.T. First Street bridge Front Street widening Old Town streetscape Old Town central parking lot Operations and Maintenance: Salaries and wages Operating and administrative expenditures Owner participation agreements Old Town plm~ implementation Old Town development incentives Old Town building facades 25,000 5~00,647 3,551,398 $ 935,985 4,487.383 850 850 850 3,100 3,100 3.100 175,000 74,750 50,646 50,646 304,230 143,56l 23,250 166,811 310,000 63350 54,685 2,248 56,933 200,000 299,399 48,819 25,881 74,700 Total Expenditures Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures Beginning Fund Balance, July 1. 2000 Ending Fund Balance, March 31, 2001 6,656,426 3,849,109 991,314 4,840,423 (4,089,910) (2,084275) 5,763,581 5,763,581 $ 1,673,671 $ 3,679,306 94% (1) 122% (2) 77% 42% 100% 69% 86% 100% 100% 68% 55% (3) (4) 90% (5) 25% 73% Notes: (1) The variance in investment interest is due to higher than anticipated cash balances being maintained during the fiscal year. (2) The variance is due to the renewal of the Reeves lease. (3) The variance in operating and administrative expenditures is due primarily to lower than anticipating legal, consulting, and other outside services costs being incurred. (4) The payment to Costco under the terms of its OPA is not made until the last quarter of the fiscal year. (5) No costs have yet been incurred for providing development incentives in Old Town. City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual Redevelopment Agency - Debt Service For the Nine Months Ended March 3 l, 2001 Annual Amended YTD Budget Activit7 Revenues: Property tax increment $ 7,061,000 $ 3,577,623 Investment interest 150,000 122,205 Advances from other fimds 75,750 53,024 Deferred passthrough 1,831,000 915,500 Total Revenues 9,117.750 4,668,352 Expenditures: Passthrough agreements Debt service - principal Debt service - interest Miscellaneous Operating transfers out Total Expenditures Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures Beginning Fm~d Balance, July 1, 2000 Ending Fund Balance, March 31, 2001 5,241,000 2,706,301 1,244,000 725,000 1,040,050 774,314 7,500 5,953 2,184,270 1,070,000 9,716,820 5,281,568 (599,070) (613,216) 2,752,016 2,752,016 $ 2,152,946 $ 2,138,800 of Budget 51% (l) 81oA 70% 50% (2) 51% 52% (2) 58% 74% 79% 49% 54% (1) Property tax increment revenue is received in January and May each fiscal year. (2) Passthrough amounts are recogmZed as property tax increment is received January & May. RDA DEPARTMENTAL REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL ClTY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANC~,~ CITYMANAGER /~/ TEMECULAREDEVELOPMENTAGENCY AGENDA REPORT Executive DirectodRedevelopment Agency Members John Meyer, Redevelopment Director//~v I July 24, 2001 Monthly Departmental Report Attached for your information is the monthly report as of July 24, 2001 for the Redevelopment Department. First Time Homebuyers Pro,qram Funding in the amount of $200,000 is available for FY 01-02. Residential Improvement Programs The program budget for FY 01/02 is $250,000 and $11,800 has been funded. Affordable Housing Two projects have been submitted for preliminary review. One project is from the Agency's development partner, the other from a property owner who is also interested in developing affordable housing. Staff is analyzing these proposals. Senior Housing Agency staff is negotiating with a development partner to rehab 96 units for affordable senior housing. A senior housing demand study is being conducted. Old Town Community Theater The Redevelopment Agency Board approved the Community Theater's Master Plan at its meeting of April 24, 2001. The Architect has begun the next Phase of the design, which includes design development and construction drawings. R:~SYERS K~IONTH LLYVeport j uly01 .doc Facade Improvement/Non-Conformin~ Si~n Pro_qram The following facade improvement/sign projects have recently been completed: · The Old Tin Box Signs · Waves of Beauty Signs · The Stampede Paint Exterior The following facade improvements are underway: · M & M Art and Frame Signs · Y's & O's Signs · Old Town Plaza Shopping Center Refinish Exterior and Signs for all units · Chaparral Building Stain Exterior · Times of Our Lives Signs · The Country Porch Interior Fire Suppression System Old Town Promotions/Marketing Hot Summer Nights began July 6 featuring a variety of live entertainment and crafts and will run through September 28, 2001. The Agency is also sponsoring several other events over the next few months. The events include Howl-o-ween in Old Town featuring pumpkin carving contests, a craft fair and live entertainment, Christmas in Old Town featuring strolling carolers, live entertainment, pictures with Santa and a craft fair. R:~SYERSK'.MONTHLLY~report.july01 .doc INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ITEM 1 MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE TEMECULA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY JANUARY 13, 1998 A meeting of the City of Temecula Industrial Development Authority was called to order at 8:42 P.M., atthe City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Chairman Roberts presiding. PRESENT: 5 AUTHORITY MEMBERS: ABSENT: 0 AUTHORITY MEMBERS: None. Comemhem, Fo~,Lindemans, Stone, and Roberts. Also present were Executive Director Bradley, City Attorney Thorson, and City Clerk Greek. Public Comments None given. Authority Business 1. Resolution of Industrial Development Authority Declaring the Intention to Issue Bonds 1.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. IDA 98-0t A RESOLUTION OF THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DECLARING THE INTENTION TO ISSUE BONDS FOR NASCAL INTERPLEX, INC. FACILITY Redevelopment Director McLarney presented the staff report (as per agenda material). MOTION: Authority Member Lindemans moved to concur with staff recommendation. The motion was seconded by Authority Member Stone and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. Executive Director's Report None given. Authority Members' Repods None given. Minutes. IDA~011398 1 Adioumment At 8:45 P.M., the Temecula Industrial Development Authority meeting as formally adjourned. Ron Roberts, Chairperson ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC Acting City Cler~Distri~ Secreta~ [SEAL] Minutes.lDA~011398 2 ITEM 2 CITY ATTORNEY AP ~)P~ DIR.OF FINANCE CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT Industrial Development Authority of the City of Temecula Genie Roberts, Director of Finance July 24, 2001 Amendment of Documents Related to Industrial Development Revenue Bonds for Tension Envelope Corporation RECOMMENDATION: entitled: That the Industrial Development Authority adopt the resolution RESOLUTION NO. IDA A RESOLUTION OF THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF AMENDMENTS TO DOCUMENTS RELATED TO INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT REVENUE BONDS FOR TENSION ENVELOPE CORPORATION BACKGROUND: On August 16, 1994, the Industrial Development Authority (the "IDA") issued $5,625,000 principal amount of Industrial Development Authority of the City of Temecula Industrial Development Revenue Bonds (Tension Envelope Corporation Project) (the "Bonds"). The proceeds of the Bonds were loaned to Tension Envelope Corporation (the "Company") to acquire and furnish an envelope manufacturing facility located in Temecula. The Company is responsible for the repayment of the loan, with its loan payments being the source of funds to repay the Bonds. The Bonds are not general obligations of the IDA and neither the IDA nor the City of Temecula has any responsibility for the payment of the Bonds. When issued, the payment of debt service on the Bonds was secured by a letter of credit provided by the Company, which letter of credit was issued by Boatman's First National Bank of Kansas City ("Boatman's"). The Company has advised City Staff that Boatman's, through a series of acquisitions by larger banks, has been merged into Bank of America, N.A. ("Bank of America"), which is the bank that is providing the letter of credit that currently secures the repayment of the Bonds. The Company has stated that the current letter of credit for the Bonds expires in August of this year and that Bank of America does not want to renew the letter of credit. The nonrenewal of the Letter of Credit will, under the terms of the Bonds, result in a mandatory redemption of the Bonds on August 1, 2001. The Company has informed City Staff that it has begun negotiations with General Electric Capital Corporation ("GE") to provide for the refunding of the Bonds by means of direct placement of The Company has informed City Staff that it has begun negotiations with General Electric Capital Corporation ("GE") to provide for the refunding of the Bonds by means of direct placement of refunding bonds with GE. However, the proposed refunding bond transaction will take a few more months to complete, and the current Letter of Credit for the Bonds expires in August. Once the Bonds are redeemed, they will not be able to be refinanced at a later date with tax-exempt bonds, so that the lower-cost tax-exempt financing for the Company will be lost. In order to preserve the Company's ability to refinance the current Bond issue on a tax-exempt basis, and yet avoid any need to have the Company bear the cost to renew or replace the Letter of Credit while it finishes its negotiations with GE, the Company has proposed that the Bond documents be amended to allow the Company to purchase the Bonds in lieu of their redemption, and to hold the Bonds pending their refinancing through GE. The proposal allows for the Bonds to be called for redemption, the amounts due to the current Bondowners to be paid in full, but, rather than the Bonds be retired, the Company would be allowed to purchase the Bonds and hold them until the refunding bond transaction can be completed. The requirement for a Letter of Credit would be terminated while the Company holds the Bonds. The proposed amendments to the Bond documents provide that the Bonds are nontransferable while they are held by the Company, and are subject to final payment and redemption if the Company has not completed the refunding bond transaction with GE by February 1, 2002. The Company is obligated to pay all costs of the IDA under the Bond program, and to indemnify the IDA for all actions taken by the IDA to implement the Bond program, and has agreed in a letter to the City to pay all costs related to the amendment of the Bond documents and other actions necessary to allow the Company to maintain the Bond program. Once the Company concludes its negotiations with GE, it is contemplated that there will be presented to the IDA for its consideration documents that will provide for the issuance of refunding bonds, to be placed with GE, the proceeds of which would then retire the Bonds. The documents for any such refunding transaction will clearly provide that neither the City nor the IDA will, in any event, be liable for payment of the Bonds or any refunding bonds from their own funds. While the IDA is not obligated to amend the Bond documents or, in the future, issue refunding bonds as described above, the Company, in the current circumstances, cannot maintain the lower cost tax-exempt financing for its plant in Temecula without assistance from the IDA. City Staff and consultants have reviewed the Company's proposal and believe that it is reasonable, and will not subject the City or the IDA to any risk or liability because the Company has agreed to pay all costs related to the proposal and to indemnify the City and the IDA from any liability related thereto. Staff recommends adoption of the resolution approving the amendments to the Bond documents. SPECIFIC ACTIONS: In order to preserve the ability to refund the Bonds at a later date, the IDA will consider the adoption of a resolution approving amendments to the Bond documents to allow the Company to purchase the Bonds in lieu of their redemption. FISCAL IMPACT: The Company has agreed to pay all-out-of-pocket expenses incurred relative to the proposed amendments. The Bonds are not general obligations of the IDA or the City, but are limited obligations of the IDA, payable solely from amounts paid by the Company to repay the Bond loan. Attachments: Resolution (1) First Supplemental Indenture First Amendment to Loan Agreement Letter of Tension Envelope Corporation requesting amendments -2- RESOLUTION NO. IDA A RESOLUTION OF THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF AMENDMENTS TO DOCUMENTS RELATED TO INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT REVENUE BONDS FOR TENSION ENVELOPE CORPORATION WHEREAS, on August 16, 1994, the Industrial Development Authority of the City of Temecula (the "Authority") issued its Industrial Development Authority of the City of Temecula Industrial Development Revenue Bonds (Tension Envelope Corporation Project) (the "Bonds"), in a principal amount of $5,625,000 to finance the costs of an envelope manufacturing facility located in the City of Temecula; WHEREAS, the Bonds were issued pursuant to an Indenture of Trust (the "Indenture"), between the Authority and U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as trustee (the "Trustee"), and the proceeds of the Bonds were loaned (the "Loan") by the Authority to Tension Envelope Corporation (the "Company") pursuant to a loan agreement (the "Loan Agreement") between the Authority and the Company; WHEREAS, the Company has requested that the Indenture and the Loan Agreement be modified to permit the Bonds to remain outstanding, following a call for redemption of the Bonds in respect of an expiring letter of credit securing the Bonds, in order to allow the Company time to arrange for the issuance of refunding bonds; WHEREAS, the Company has agreed to pay all costs of the Authority related to the modifications and to indemnify the Authority and the City of Temecula (the "City") for actions taken by them in respect of any amendments to the Indenture and the Loan Agreement necessary to implement the actions requested by the Company; and WHEREAS, there have been presented to the Authority at this meeting proposed amendments to the Indenture and the Loan Agreement and the Authority now desires to approve the amendments and to authorize their execution and delivery. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Industrial Development Authority of the City of Temecula, that: Section '1. and correct. The Authority hereby finds and declares that the above recitals are true Section 2. The First Supplemental Indenture, in the form on file with the Secretary, is hereby approved. The Executive Director of the Authority is hereby authorized and directed to execute and deliver the First Supplemental Indenture in said form, together with such additions thereto or changes therein as are recommended or approved by the Executive Director of the Authority upon consultation with the City Attorney and Bond Counsel to the Authority, including such additions or changes as are necessary or advisable in accordance with Section 4 hereof, the approval of such changes to be conclusively evidenced by the execution and delivery of the Indenture by the Authority. Section 3. The First Amendment to Loan Agreement, in the form on file with the Secretary, is hereby approved. The Executive Director of the Authority is hereby authorized and directed to execute and deliver the First Amendment to Loan Agreement in said form, together with such additions thereto or changes therein as are recommended or approved by the Executive Director of the Authority upon consultation with the City Attorney and Bond Counsel to the Authority, including such additions or changes as are necessary or advisable in accordance with Section 4 hereof, the approval of such changes to be conclusively evidenced by the execution and delivery of the First Amendment to Loan Agreement by the Authority. Section 4. All actions heretofore taken by the officers and agents of the Authority with respect to the indenture, the Loan Agreement, the Bonds and the Loan are hereby approved, confirmed and ratified, and the proper officers of the Authority are hereby authorized and directed, for and in the name and on behalf of the Authority, (a) to do any and all things and take any and all actions and execute any and all certificates, agreements and other documents, which they, or any of them, may deem necessary or advisable in order to consummate the amendments to the Indenture and the Loan Agreement contemplated by the First Supplemental Indenture and the First Amendment to Loan Agreement, respectively, in accordance with this Resolution, including but not limited to any certificates, agreements and documents described in the First Supplemental Indenture and the First Amendment to Loan Agreement, and (b) to take all actions and execute any and all documents necessary or desirable to complete the purchase in lieu of redemption of the Bonds permitted by the First Supplemental Indenture. Section 5. The law firm of Quint & Thimmig LLP is hereby designated as bond counsel to the Authority, and the firm of Fieldman, Rolapp & Associates is hereby designated as financial advisor to the Authority, in each case with respect to the Bonds, the amendments to the documents related to the Bonds and any bonds that may in the future be issued by the Authority to refund the Bonds. The Executive Director is authorized and directed to enter into agreements with said firms for their services in forms acceptable to the Executive Director and the City Attorney, provided that any and all compensation to such firms is to be paid by the Company. Section 6. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the Board of Directors of the Industrial Development Authority of the City of Temecula, at a regular meeting held on the 24~" day of July, 2001. ATTEST: Jeff Comerchero, Chairperson Susan W. Jones, CMC Secretary STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan Jones, Secretary of the Industrial Development Authority of the City of Temecula, HEREBY DO CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. __ was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Industrial Development Authority of the City of Temecula on the 24th day of July, 2001, by the following roll call vote: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: BOARDMEMBERS: BOARDMEMBERS: BOARDMEMBERS: BOARDMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC Secmtary FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL INDENTURE This First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 31, 2001 (this "Supplement"), is by and between the Industrial Development Authority of the City of Temecula (the "Authority"), and U.S. Bank Trust National Association, successor to Bank of America National Trust and Savings Association, as trustee (the "Trustee"). RECITALS: WHEREAS, the Authority and the Trustee are parties to an Indenture of Trust, dated as of August 1, 1994 (the "Original Indenture"), pursuant to which the Authority has issued its $5,625,000 principal amount of its Industrial Development Authority of the City of Temecula Industrial Development Revenue Bonds (Tension Envelope Corporation Project) (the "Bonds"); and WHEREAS, the Authority made a loan (the "Loan") of the proceeds of the Bonds to Tension Envelope Corporation (the "Borrower") pursuant to a Loan Agreement, dated as of August 1, 1994 (the "Loan Agreement"), between the Authority and the Borrower; and WHEREAS, the Original Indenture and the Bonds provide that the Bonds are subject to redemption upon the expiration of the letter of credit (the "Letter of Credit") which secures the repayment of the Bonds, and the Loan Agreement provides that the Loan is subject to prepayment in connection with any such redemption; and WHEREAS, the Borrower has requested that the Original Indenture and the Loan Agreement be amended to allow the Bonds to be purchased in lieu of redemption and remain outstanding upon the expiration of the Letter of Credit to allow for time for the Borrower to arrange for a refinancing of the Loan; and WHEREAS, Section 13.01 of the Original Indenture provides that the Original Indenture may be amended by a supplemental indenture, without the consent of the owners of the Bonds, in connection with any amendment of, or supplement to, the Loan Agreement, and to make changes which do not materially adversely affect the rights of any Bond owners; and WHEREAS, the Authority is willing to amend the Original Indenture to allow for a purchase in lieu of redemption of the Bonds, and as otherwise set forth in this Supplement, and has requested that the Trustee execute and deliver this Supplement, so that the Borrower may have time to arrange for a refinancing of the Loan; and WHEREAS, the Authority and the Borrower are amending the Loan Agreement to permit the purchase in lieu of redemption of the Bonds, and the Authority has, as expressed below, found and determined that the amendments to the Original Indenture in this First Supplement do not materially adversely affect the rights of the Bond owners. AGREEMENT: NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and for other consideration the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto do hereby agree as follows: Section 1. Amendments. (a) Section 2.03(d) of the Original Indenture is hereby amended by adding thereto, as a new second paragraph thereof, the following: "Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Indenture, if the Bonds become subject to redemption pursuant to the preceding paragraph, the Bonds shall be purchased in lieu of redemption as follows: (i) the redemption price of the Bonds shall be paid to the owners of the Bonds on the scheduled redemption date from the proceeds of a draw on the Letter of Credit as provided in Sections 5.05 and 5.07 hereof, (ii) the Bonds shall not be redeemed but shall be purchased in the name of the Borrower, shall be registered by the Trustee in the name of the Borrower and shall be held by the Trustee for the benefit of the Borrower, and (iii) following the receipt by the Trustee of the proceeds of the draw on the Letter of Credit and the payment to the Bond owners described in the preceding clause (i), the Trustee shall surrender the Letter of Credit to the Bank, and shall remit to the Bank any amounts on deposit in the Bond Fund in respect of a reimbursement of such draw on the Letter of Credit, up to the amount of such draw. The date on which the transactions referred to in the preceding sentence occur is hereby designated as the "Purchase Date," and, from and after the completion of such transactions the Bonds shall be subject to the provisions of Article XVII hereof." (b) The Original Indenture is hereby amended by adding thereto, as a new Article XVII thereof, the following: "ARTICLE XVII PROVISIONS IN EFFECT COMMENCING ON THE PURCHASE DATE Section 17.01 Provisions Applicable to the Bonds Commencin,q on the Purchase Date. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Indenture, on the Purchase Date (as defined in Section 2.03(d)), immediately following completion of the transactions described in clauses (i), (ii) and (iii) of the first sentence of the second paragraph of Section 2.03(d), the following provisions shall apply and any shall prevail over any conflicting provisions of this Indenture: (a) the Bonds shall be subject to optional redemption in whole on any date, at the written request of the Borrower delivered to the Trustee, at a redemption price equal to the then Outstanding principal amount of the Bonds plus accrued interest to the redemption date, without premium; (b) the Bonds shall be subject to mandatory redemption, in whole, on February 1, 2002, at a redemption price equal to the then Outstanding principal amount of the Bonds, plus accrued interest to the redemption date, without premium; (c) no notice on any redemption described in the preceding clauses (a) or (b), or in Section 2.03, need be given; (d) there shall be no requirement for a Letter of Credit, and all references to the Bank, the Letter of Credit and the Letter of Credit Fund herein shall be of no further force and effect (including but not limited to any provisions relating to any requirement to maintain a Letter of Credit, any provisions relating to drawings on the Letter of Credit, any requirement for payments or notice to, or the consent of, the Bank, and the provisions of Sections 5.07, 6.01, 6.02 and 13.04); (e) the Bonds shall not be subject to transfer under Section 2.07 or exchange under Section 2.08; (f) clause (1) of the term "Available Moneys" in Section 1.01 shall be amended to include the following: "and any moneys remitted by the Borrower to the Trustee;" and (g) no further notices need be given to Standard & Poor's Ratings Group under Section 15.05." Section 2. Findings and Determinations. The Authority hereby finds and determines that the amendments to the Original Indenture in Section 1 above do not materially adversely affect the rights of any of the Bond owners. -2- Section 3. Affirmation. Except as amended pursuant to Section 1 above, the terms and provisions of the Original Indenture are here affirmed. Section 4. Effective Date. This Supplement shall become effective upon the execution hereof by the Authority and the Trustee, and the execution of the consents of the Bank and Borrower (as such terms are defined in the Indenture) hereto as set forth below. Section 5. Interpretation. In the event of any conflict between the provisions of the Original Indenture and the provisions of this Supplement, the provisions of this Supplement shall control. Any reference in this Supplement to a Section, without further qualification (such as, by way of example, "of this Indenture") shall mean the specific section of the Original Indenture, as amended and supplemented by this Supplement. All references to the Original Indenture in the Loan Agreement or any other document executed in connection with any of the foregoing shall refer to the Original indenture as amended by this Supplement. Section 6. Execution in Several Counterparts. This Supplement may be executed in any number of counterparts and each of such counterparts shall for all purposes be deemed to be an original; and all such counterparts shall together constitute but one and the same instrument. -3- IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA has caused this Supplement to be signed in its name and U.S. BANK TRUST NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, has caused this Supplement to be signed in its name, all as of the day and year first above written. INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA By: Jeff Comerchero, Chairperson U.S. BANK TRUST NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee The undersigned hereby consent to the foregoing First Supplemental Indenture BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL TRUST AND SAVINGS ASSOCIATION By: Authorized Officer By: Authorized Officer TENSION ENVELOPE CORPORATION By: Its: -4- FIRST AMENDMENT TO LOAN AGREEMENT THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO LOAN AGREEMENT dated as of July 31, 2001 (the "First Amendment") is by and between the Industrial Development Authority of the City of Temecula (the "Authority"), and Tension Envelope Corporation (the "Borrower"). RECITALS: WHEREAS, the Authority and the Borrower are parties to a Loan Agreement, dated as of August 1, 1994 (the "Original Loan Agreement"), pursuant to which the Authority has made a loan (the "Loan") to the Borrower to finance the acquisition and furnishing of an envelope manufacturing facility in the City of Temecula; and WHEREAS, the Loan was made from the proceeds of the Authority's Industrial Development Revenue Bonds (Tension Envelope Corporation Project) (the "Bonds") which were issued by the Authority pursuant to an Indenture of Trust, dated as of August 1, 1994 (the "Indenture"), between the Authority and U.S. Bank Trust National Association, successor to Bank of America National Trust and Savings Association, as trustee (the "Trustee"); and WHEREAS, the Indenture and the Bonds provide that the Bonds are subject to redemption upon expiration of the letter of credit which secures the repayment of the Bonds (the "Letter of Credit"), and Section 8.01 of the Original Loan Agreement provides that the Loan is subject to mandatory prepayment upon a failure to replace an expiring or terminating Letter of Credit; and WHEREAS, the Borrower has requested that the Authority amend the Indenture to permit a purchase in lieu of redemption of the Bonds so that the Bonds may remain outstanding under the Indenture in order to allow the Borrower time to arrange for a refinancing of the Loan; and WHEREAS, the Authority is willing to assist the Borrower and to that end will execute and deliver, at the same time that the Authority executes and delivers this First Amendment, a First Supplemental Indenture (the "First Supplement") which amends the Indenture to allow for a purchase in lieu of redemption of the Bonds; and WHEREAS, Section 9.04 of the Original Loan Agreement permits the amendment of the Original Loan Agreement by a written instrument executed by the Authority and the Borrower, and consented to by the Bank, as such term is used in the Loan Agreement, in connection with any authorized amendment of the Indenture, and this First Amendment is being executed and delivered by the Authority and the Borrower in connection with the First Supplement which the Authority represents is an authorized amendment to the Indenture. AGREEMENT: NOW, THEREFORE in consideration of the premises and for other consideration the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto do hereby agree as follows: Section 1. Amendment. The Original Loan Agreement is hereby amended by adding thereto, as a new Article X thereof, the following: "ARTICLE X PROVISIONS IN EFFECT COMMENCING ON THE PURCHASE DATE Section 10.01 Provisions Applicable Commencing on the Purchase Date. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, on the Purchase Date (as defined in Section 2.03(d) of the Indenture, as amended by the First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 31, 2001 (the "First Supplement"), between the Authority and the Trustee) immediately following completion of the transactions described in clauses (i), (ii) and (iii) of the first sentence of the second paragraph of Section 2.03(d) of the Indenture, as amended by the First Supplement, the following provisions shall apply and shall prevail over any conflicting provisions of this Agreement: (a) the repayment of the Loan required by clause (ii) of Section 8.01 of the Original Loan Agreement in connection with the actions under Section 2.03(d) of the Indenture shall be deemed to be an advance against, and not a prepayment of, the Loan, and the Loan shall remain outstanding on the Purchase Date in an amount equal to the then Outstanding principal amount of the Bonds; (b) the Loan shall be subject to mandatory prepayment in full, with accrued interest, on any redemption date described in Section 17.01 of the Indenture, as amended by the First Supplement; (c) the Loan shall be subject to optional prepayment in full on any date without premium and without prior notice; and (d) there shall be no requirement to provide or maintain a Letter of Credit, and all references to the Bank and the Letter of Credit herein shall be of no further force and effect (including but not limited to those in Sections 5.09, 9.01, 9.03 and 9.04). Section 2. Affirmation. Except as amended pursuant to Section 1 above, the terms and provisions of the Original Loan Agreement are hereby affirmed. Section 3. Payment of Costs, Indemnity. The Borrower hereby agrees to pay, promptly following written demand therefor, all costs and expenses of the Authority, the City of Temecula and the Trustee related to the First Supplement, this First Amendment, the purchase in lieu of redemption of the Bonds as contemplated by the First Supplement, and the implementation of the other provisions of the First Supplement and this First Amendment; and the Borrower hereby acknowledges that the provisions of Section 4.09 of the Original Loan Agreement apply to any and all actions by the Authority and/or the Trustee in any way related to this First Amendment or the First Supplement, and the Borrower hereby agrees that all references to the Authority in said Section 4.09 shall include the City of Temecula. Section 4. Effective Date. This First Amendment shall become effective upon the execution hereof by the Authority and the Borrower, and the execution of the consent of the Bank hereto as set forth below. Section 5. Execution of Counterparts. This First Amendment may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall be an original and all of which shall constitute but one and the same instrument. -2- IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this First Amendment, all as of the date first above written. INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA By: Jeff Comerchero, Chairperson TENSION ENVELOPE CORPORATION The Bank, by its execution below, hereby consents to the foregoing First Amendment to Loan Agreement BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL TRUST AND SAVINGS ASSOCIATION By: Its: By: Authorized Officer -3- co VOe, x °N June 26, 2001 City Council City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, California 92590 Re: Industrial Development Authority of the City of Temecula Industrial Development Revenue Bonds (Tension Envelope Corporation Project) Dear Councilmembers: In August of '1994, the Industrial Development Authority of the City of Temecula issued tax-exempt bonds to finance the acquisition and development of an envelope manufacturing plant for Tension Envelope Corporation (the "Company") in the City of Temecula. The financing was successful, and the Company's plant in Temecula currently has over 129 full-time employees. The Company is responsible for the payment of all of the debt service on the bonds. The payment of debt service on the bonds was initially secured by a letter of credit provided by Boatman's First National Bank of Kansas City. Boatman's, through a sedes of acquisitions by larger banks, has been merged into Bank of America, N.A., which is the bank that is providing the letter of credit that currently secures the repayment of the bonds. The current letter of credit for the bonds expires in August of this year. Bank of America has informed the Company that, due to changing business plans (and not in any way related to the current credit of the Company), while it may be willing to extend its Letter of Credit for a limited period of time, it does not want to renew the Letter of Credit that secures the bonds on a long-term basis. The nonrenewal of the Letter of Credit will, under the terms of the bonds, result in a mandatory redemption of the bonds on August 1, 2001 and a corresponding loss of the lower interest rate tax-exempt financing for the Company's plant in Temecula. The loss of the tax-exempt financing will increase the Company's costs in an already extremely competitive market, and could adversely impact the Company's operations in Temecula. City Council City of Temecula June 26, 2001 Page 2 of 2 The Company has begun negotiations with General Electric Capital Corporation to provide for the refunding of the bonds by means of direct placement of refunding bonds with GE. However, the proposed refunding bond transaction will take a few more months to complete, and the current Letter of Credit for the bonds expires in August. As an interim measure, to allow Bank of America to cancel its Letter of Credit, yet allow the bonds to eventually be refinanced by refunding bonds to be placed with GE, your Bond Counsel, Quint & Thimmig LLP, has recommended that the current bond documents be revised to (i) permit the bonds to be called for redemption on August 1st, (ii) allow the Company to purchase the bonds, with its own funds, in lieu of redemption, and (iii) allow the bonds to remain outstanding, registered in the Company's name, until the refunding bond transaction with GE can be consummated. This plan will allow the Company to preserve the tax-exempt financing for the Temecula plant, without any dsk or cost to the City of Temecula or the IDA. We respectfully request that the City Council, as the governing body of the Industrial Development Authority take the actions necessary to implement the plan, including the adoption of a resolution at its July 2~th meeting approving necessary amendments to the current bond documents. The current documents for the bonds, including a Loan Agreement between the Company and the City's Industrial Development Authority, provide for the Company to pay all of the costs of the Industrial Development Authority to administer the bonds, and the Loan Agreement contains a provision whereby the Company indemnifies the Industrial Development Authority for any liability, cost or expense related to the administration of the bond program. We hereby acknowledge that the foregoing covenants apply fully to any actions by the Industrial Development Authority to amend the bond documents and assist us in implementing the plan described above, such that the Tension Envelope Company affirms its obligation to pay all costs of the Industrial Development Authority related to the plan and the bonds and to indemnify the Industrial Development Authority for any liability, cost or expense related to the plan and the bonds. We hereby agree that the foregoing covenant and indemnity shall also apply to the City of Temecula. We agree to pay all such City and Industrial Development Authority costs and expenses promptly following receipt of a wdtten request for payment. Thank you for your consideration of this request, and we look forward to working with City Staff and the City's consultants to implement the plan and thereby help us to maintain the financial competitiveness of the Company's Temecula plant. Very truly yours, Tension Envelope Corporation Larry R. Denton Vice President - Finance ITEM 21 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FII~IA~ CITY MANAGER,/ TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Gary Thornhill,'"i~eeputy City Manager July 24, 2001 Harveston Specific Plan and Related Applications Prepared by: Patty Anders, Project Planner RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council: 1. ADOPT a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 01 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA CERTIFYING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT PREPARED FOR THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN AND RELATED ACTIONS, AND ADOPTING THE FINDINGS PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS, AND A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM IN CONNECTION THEREWITH FOR THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED EAST OF INTERSTATE 15, NORTH OF SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK, WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD AND SOUTH OF THE NORTHERN CITY LIMTS (PLANNING APPLICATION 00-0189) 2. ADOPT a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 01- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 99-0419 (GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT) FOR THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN AND THE TWO EXCLUDED PARCELS WITHIN THE SPECIFIC PLAN AND ADOPTING SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 13 (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 99-0418) ON PARCELS TOTALING 550 ACRES LOCATED EAST OF INTERSTATE 15, NORTH OF SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK, WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD AND SOUTH OF THE NORTHERN CITY LIMIT, AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NOS. 910-261-001,910-261-002, 910-110-013, 910- R:\S P~Harvcston SPeCify Council~STAFFRPT 7-24-01.doc 110'015, 910-110-020, 910-110-021,910'110'027, 910'110-076, 910-100- 007, 910-100-008, 910'060'009, 910'120'005, 910'120-007, 910-120-008, 911-630-001,911-630-002, 911 '630-003, 911-640-001,911-640-002, 911 - 180-002, 911-180'003, 911-180-004, 911-180-008, 911-180-009, 911-180- 015, 911-180-023, AND 911-180-028 3. READ by title only and introduce an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 01- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, AMENDING THE DEVELOPMENT CODE TO AMEND SECTION 17.16.070 TO INCLUDE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 13 AND ADOPTING A PORTION OF CHAPTER 11 (DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS) ZONING STANDARDS CONTAINED THEREIN FOR RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT FOR THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 13, ON PARCELS TOTALING APPROXIMATELY 550 ACRES LOCATED ON THE EAST OF INTERSTATE 15, NORTH OF SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK, WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD AND SOUTH OF THE NORTHERN CITY LIMIT, AND FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS ASS ESSO R PARC EL NOS. 910-261-001,910-261-002, 910-110-013, 910- 110-015, 910-110-020, 910-110-021,910-110-027, 910-110-076, 910-100- 007, 910-100-008, 910-060-009, 910-120-008, 911-630-001,911-630-002, 911-630-003, 911-640-001,911-640-002, 911-180-002, 911-180-003, 911 - 180-004, 911-180-008, 911-180-009, 911-180-015, 911-180-023 AN D 911 - 180-02 (PLANNING APPLICATION 99-0418) 4. READ by title only and introduce an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 01- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE ZONE CHANGE FOR THE AREA OF THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN AND AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ON PARCELS TOTALING 550 ACRES LOCATED ADJACENT TO INTERSTATE 15, NORTH OF SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK, WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD AND SOUTH OF THE NORTHERN CITY LIMIT, AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NOS. 910-261-001, 910-261-002, 910-110-013, 910-110-015, 910-110-020, 910-110-021,910- 110-027, 910-110-076, 910-100-007, 910-100-008, 910-060-009, 910-120- 003, 910-120-007, 910-120-008, 911-630-001,911-630-002, 911-630-003, 911-640-001, 911-640-002, 911-180-002, 911-180-003, 911-180-004, 911- 180-008, 911-180-009, 911-180-015, 911-180-023 AND 911-180-028. (PLANNING APPLICATION 99-0245) 5. READ by title only and introduce an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 01- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THAT CERTAIN AGREEMENT ENTITLED "DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND R:\S P\Harveston SP~City CounciI\STAFFRPT 7-24-01.doc 2 LENNAR COMMUNITIES (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 99-0446)" ADOPT a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 01- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 00-0295 - TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 29639, THE SUBDIVISION OF APPROXIMATELY 550 ACRES INTO 91 LOTS WHICH CONFORM TO THE PLANNING AREAS, OPEN SPACE AREAS, SCHOOL AND PARK SITES OF THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN LOCATED EAST OF INTERSTATE 15, NORTH OF SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK, WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD AND SOUTH OF THE NORTHERN CITY LIMIT, AND FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NOS. 910-261-001,910-261-002, 910-110-013, 910-110-015, 910-110-020, 910-110-021,910-110-027, 910- 110-076, 910-100-007, 910-100-008, 910-060-009, 910-120-008, 911-630- 001,911-630-002, 911-630-003, 911-640-001,911-640-002, 911-180-002, 911-180-003, 911-180-004, 911-180-008, 911-180-009, 911-180-015, 911 - 180-023 AND 911-180-028 ADOPT a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 01- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 01-0030 - TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 29928, THE SUBDIVISION OF APPROXIMATELY 40 ACRES INTO 140 RESIDENTIAL LOTS AND 21 OPEN SPACE LOTS IN PLANNING AREA 7 OF THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN; LOCATED EAST OF INTERSTATE 15, NORTH OF SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK, WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD AND SOUTH OF THE NORTHERN CITY LIMIT, AND FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NOS. 911- 180-003,911-180-004, 911-640-001 AN D 911-630-003 ADOPT a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 01- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 01-0031 - TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 29929, THE SUBDIVISION OF APPROXIMATELY 20 ACRES INTO 118 RESIDENTIAL LOTS AND 3 OPEN SPACE LOTS IN A PORTION OF PLANNING AREAS 3 AND 4 OF THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN; LOCATED EAST OF INTERSTATE 15, NORTH OF SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK, WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD AND SOUTH OF THE NORTHERN CITY LIMIT, AND FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS ASSESSOR PARCEL N OS. 910-261-001,910-261-002, 911-180-002, 911 - 180-003, 911-180-004 AN D 911-180-015 R:\S I~Harveston SPxCity CounciI\STAFFRPT 7-24-01.doc 3 9. ADOPT a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 01- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 01-0032 - TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 30088, THE SUBDIVISION OF APPROXIMATELY 9.18 ACRES INTO 38 RESIDENTIAL LOTS AND 8 OPEN SPACE LOTS IN A PORTION OF PLANNING AREA 4 OF THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN; LOCATED EAST OF INTERSTATE 15, NORTH OF SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK, WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD AND SOUTH OF THE NORTHERN CITY LIMIT, AND FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NOS. 911-630-001,911-630-002 AND 911-180-015 BACKGROUND: City staff has been working with Lennar Communities since last year to create a plan for a high quality community to implement the General Plan. The project area is approximately 550 acres and proposes to develop 1,921 dwelling units and over 100 acres of service commercial property. The project includes an 8-acre lake component (the surrounding park will be open to the public), community park, elementary school, a riparian habitat restoration area, in addition to various project and community amenities. A more detailed description of the project is contained in the June 20, 2001 Planning Commission staff report that is contained in Attachment No. 11. Prior to the project being finalized, the Planning Commission held three workshops which reviewed the overall plan and focused on the following areas: Open SpaceJillage Green, Residential Design Guidelines and Architecture, and Traffic Impacts and Circulation. In addition, two community workshops were held at Chaparral High School for local residents to learn about the project, ask questions, and share comments and concerns. The public's reaction to the project at the workshops was very positive expressing little or no opposition. The project was heard by the Planning Commission on June 20, 2001 and July 12, 2001. The project before the City Council includes the following items. · · · · · · · · Cer[ification of the EIR and Mitigation Monitoring Program General Plan Amendment Specific Plan Zoning Map Amendment Development Code Amendment Development Agreement Master (Financing) Tract Map 3 Tentative Tract Maps Planninq Commission Hearinqs At the June 20, 2001 Planning Commission hearing, several members of the public attended the meeting and addressed the Commission. Three people spoke in support of the project and one spoke in opposition. The three people who spoke in favor of the project all lived in the Winchester Creek subdivision, which is northeast of the site. In addition, Ed Burke representing Channell Commercial also told the Commission about his land use compatibility concerns with the community park. James Miller, representing the City of Murrieta, expressed concerns that the Cherry Street alignment may not be the best place for the interchange and that the funding may not be available in the future. The Cherry Street alignment is the alignment currently shown on the City of Murrieta's Circulation Element Map. R:\S P\Hm vcston SFSCity CounciI\STAFFRPT 7-24-01 .doc 4 At the July 12, 2001 Planning Commission hearing, two individuals spoke in support of the project and four individuals spoke against the project, none of these speakers lived adjacent to the project site. Dave Gallaher with the Temecula Valley Unified School District (TVUSD) also answered questions from the Planning Commission about how TVUSD provides school facilities. The Planning Commission staff reports for the June 20th and July 12Ih public hearings are contained in Attachments 11 and 12, respectively. Draft minutes for these meetings will be provided under separate cover. Two topics of discussion at both hearings were the mitigation of school impacts and the liability issue associated with requiring public access to the lake. Information relating to the mitigation of school impacts and lake liability issues are contained in Attachment Nos. 18 and 19. After considering the information and the testimony, the Commission determined that requiring public access to the lake was not reasonable or necessary and that Lennar has fully mitigating their school facility impacts. During the Planning Commissioner's discussion, the Commission discussed the Plan and made the following recommended changes to the Draft Specific Plan: Required architectural diversity by limiting the repetition of any one architectural style to no more than 20% of the total single family units in the project; · Required all residential product reviews to be approved by the Planning Commission; Required that all minor modifications to the development standards be approved by the Planning Commission; Required the focal point element in the roundabout (between the Village Core and Elementary School) to be something other than just a flag pole; and, · Required that the focal point element be approved by the Planning Commission. The Commission also accepted staff's other clarifications and corrections. A combined list of the Planning Commission's recommended changes to the Draft Specific Plan is in Attachment No. 13. The recommended modifications will not require changes to the tract maps that accompany this proposal. Copies of the correspondence received on this project are located in Attachment No. 16. The applicant is also proposing a Community Mobility Enhancement Plan (CMEP) to further address mobility and circulation issues with the Harveston Specific Plan. The CMEP proposes to integrate alternate approaches to travel, including foot, bicycle, and public transportation into the future development of the Specific Plan. A copy of the Community Mobility Enhancement Plan is located in Attachment No. 20. Interchanqe Location One of the remaining issues to be finalized is the ultimate location of the interchange and the associated alignments for Date/Cherry Street and Ynez Road. Staff is working with Caltrans to get a Project Study Report (PSR) approved by Caltrans. The PSR would determine the location for the future interchange of Cherry Street and Interstate 15. Once the location of the interchange is known, then the preliminary layout and dedication area for the future interchange can be determined. This determination will then allow the City to set the future alignments for both Cherry Street and Ynez Road. These determinations will enable development to occur on the western half of the project site. R:\S P~Harveston SPxCity CounciI\STAFFRPT 7-24-01.doc 5 The Draft Specific Plan and Final EIR considered both alignments. At this time, staff is recommending that the City Council approve the concept of the Cherry Street Alignment in both the Specific Plan and Environmental Impact Report. As a result, staff has included a condition of approval in the Specific Plan (and the master tract map) to make minor modifications to the Plan to reflect these final changes. The minor adjustments could include changes to the Exhibits, planning area boundaries, and planning area sizes and unit calculations consistent with the adopted CEQA Alternative. The total development potential for the Harveston Specific Plan would not be increased with these adjustments. No development would be allowed on the western portion of the site until these alignments are determined and the modifications are made to the Specific Plan. The alignment uncertainty will also affect the future zoning for the two out-parcels. While the future zoning designations may be ultimately determined by the final alignment of Ynez Road, there is a need to assign non-specific plan zoning on the properties. As a result, the Planning Commission is recommending that these two sites be designated as Low Medium Density Residential to ensure future land use compatibility. In addition, a small portion of the site, immediately north of Channel Commercial and south of the anticipated right-of-way for Ynez Road is proposed to be designated at Light Industrial to ensure an appropriate land use designation in this area. Tract Maps Accompanying the Specific Plan and EIR are the first 4 tract maps to implement the Harveston Specific Plan. Tentative Tract Map 29639 will create 91 larger parcels to facilitate future development. The parcels being created in the residential portion of the project will, in most cases, be re-subdivided to create specific building site parcels. The lots in the service commercial area, once finalized, could be proposed for future development without the need for any subsequent tentative map approval. The resolution and conditions of approval for this map are located in Attachment No. 6. Tentative Map 29928 would create 140 single family and 21 open space lots within Planning Area 7 near the intersection of Date Street and Margarita Road. The map contains the design features and elements required by the Harveston Specific Plan. Planning Area 7 has a Low Medium designation and requires an average lot size of 5,000 square feet and sets the minimum lot size at 4,000 square feet. The actual lot sizes being proposed range from 6,000 square feet to 14,000 square feet. The resolution and conditions of approval for this map are located in Attachment No. 7 Tentative Map 29929 would create 118 single family and 3 open space lots within Planning Areas 3 and 4 around the elementary school. The map contains the design features and elements required by the Harveston Specific Plan. Planning Area 3 has a Medium 2 designation and requires an average lot size of 2,500 square feet and sets the minimum lot size at 2,000 square feet. Lots in this area range from 2,715 square feet to 4,529 square feet. Planning Area 4 has a Low Medium designation and requires an average lot size of 5,000 square feet and sets the minimum lot size at 4,000 square feet. The actual lot sizes being proposed range from 4,675 square feet to 9,621 square feet. The resolution and conditions of approval for this map are located in Attachment No. 8. Tentative Map 30088 would create 38 single family and 8 open space lots within Planning Area 4. The map contains the design features and elements required by the Harveston Specific Plan. Planning Area 4 has a Low Medium designation and requires an average lot size of 5,000 square feet and sets the minimum lot size at 4,000 square feet. The actual lot sizes being proposed range from 5,440 square feet to 10,326 square feet. The resolution and conditions of approval for this map are located in Attachment No. 9. R:\S P\Hal vcston S[~\City CouIlciI\STAFFRPT 7-24-01 .doc 6 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT On July 12, 2001, the Planning Commission reviewed the Development Agreement and made no substantial changes to the proposed Deal Points in the Development Agreement. A copy of the draft Development Agreement is contained in Attachment No. 10. Staffand both applicants, Lennar and Winchester Hills, are in complete agreement on all the Deal Points. The major Deal Points have been outlined below: · A 10 year Development Agreement term with Lennar for the residential portion; · A 10 year Development Agreement term with Winchester Hills for the commercial portion but the applicant is requesting 15 years; · Formation of a Community Facilities District (CFD) to fund all the agreed upon improvements; · Completion of on-site road improvements (refer to Attachment 5 of the Development Agreement); of the 1 buddmgpermitforthe · Completion of off-site road improvements prior to issuance st · . project (refer to Attachment 5 of the Development Agreement); · Conveyance of the Cherry/Date interchange right-of-way prior to January 1, 2003; · Payment of the Public Art/Open Space/Conservation fee of $200 per residential unit; · Contribution of $150,000 towards the purchase of fire department equipment prior to issuance of the 1st building permit; · Credits for Street Improvements and Traffic Signal components of the DIF, future TUMF, and Development Agreement fees for the commercial portion; · Credits for Street Improvements, Park and Recreation, and Traffic Signal components of the DIF, future TUMF, and Development Agreement fees for the residential portion; · Payments of the Fire and Corporate Facilities components of the DIF for the commercial portion; · Payments of the Fire, Library, and Corporate Facilities components of the DIF for the residential portion; · Completion of the 16.5 acre Community Park prior to the issuance of the 1st building permit for Phase II; · Public access to the Lake Park; and, · A Transit Component consisting of funding for $300,000to utilize for transit purposes. FISCAL IMPACT: In addition to the Development Impact Fees (DIF), this project will be paying a Development Agreement Fee and a fee for purchase of open space/habitatJpublic art. The developers have received credits in exchange for land dedications and improvements for many aspects of the project. The following summarizes these fees and credits: R:\S P\Harveston SP\City CounciI\STAFFRPT %24-01.doc 7 Development Impact Fees · RESIDENTIAL DIF (LENNAR) o Street Improvement Component- 100% credit for the $547.70 per attached unit and $781.35 per detached unit fee. o Traffic Signal Component - 100% credit for the $82.53 per attached unit and $116.82 per detached unit fee. o Park and Recreation Component - 100% credit for the $1295.83 per attached unit and $1726.71 per detached unit fee. o Corporate Facilities Component - Payment of the $126.47 per attached unit and $237.94 per detached unit fee. o Fire Protection Facilities Component - Payment of the payment of the $45.02 per attached unit and $56.95 per detached unit fee. o Libraries Component- Payment of the $167.21 per attached unit and $222.94 per detached unit fee. · COMMERCIAL DIF (WINCHESTER HILLS) Office Street Improvement Component - 100% credit for the $1.954 per square feet fee. Traffic Signal Improvement Component - 100% credit for the $0.298 per square feet fee. Fire Protection Facilities Component - Payment the $0.267 per square feet fee. Corporate Facilities Component - Payment of the $0.102 per square feet fee. Retail Commercial Street Improvement Component - 100% credit for the $6.031 per square feet fee. Traffic Signal Improvement Component - 100% credit for the $0.919 per square feet fee. Fire Protection Facilities Component - Payment of the $0.048 per square feet fee. Corporate Facilities Component - Payment of the $0.252 per square feet fee. Service Commercial o Street Improvement Component - 100% credit for the $3.017 per square feet fee. o Traffic Signal Improvement Component - 100% credit for the $0.458 per square feet fee. o Fire Protection Facilities Component- Payment of the $0.038 per square feet fee. o Corporate Facilities Component - Payment of the $0.14 per square feet fee. Business Park/Institutional Street Improvement Component - 100% credit for the $1.429 per square feet fee. Traffic Signal Improvement Component - 100% credit for the $0.219 per square feet fee. Fire Protection Facilities Component - Payment of the $0.033 per square feet fee. Corporate Facilities Component - Payment of the $0.085 per square feet fee. R:\S P\Harvestoa SP\City CounciI\STAFFRPT 7-24-01.doc 8 Development Aqreement Fees · Development Agreement Fee - 100% credit for the Development Agreement fee towards the improvements and the conveyance of the right-of-way for the interchange. · Open Space/Habitat/Public Art - Payment of the $200 per residential unit fee. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT The Draft Environmental Impact Report was cimulated from November 1,2000 to December 18, 2000. Comments were received and the responses to these initial comments are contained in the Final EIR. The City's responses to the comments to the EIR are contained in the Final EIR documents that has been provided to the Council. The Planning Commission is also recommending that a minor correction be made to the land use acreage summary on Exhibit 12, Existing General Plan Land Use Designations. This very minor correction involves a shift of 29.4 acres from the Low Medium to the Medium Density category for the current General Plan. This adjustment is being recommended to ensure that accurate before and after comparison is shown in the EIR document. The adjustment does not change the future project or the overall accuracy of the EIR. A copy of the corrected Exhibit 12 is contained in Attachment 12. Subsequent project letters, and the City response to Channelt Commemial's concerns are contained in Attachment Nos. 16 and 17, respectively. The Council has previously received copies of both the Draft and Final Environmental Impact Report. The approval of this project will require the adoption of a Statement of Overriding Considerations for air quality impacts (short-term, long-term and cumulative). The Planning Commission is recommending that the City Council adopt the Cherry Street Interchange Alternative as part of the Harveston Specific Plan. Attachments: City Council Resolution No. 01 -__ Certifying the Environmental Impact Report and Mitigation Monitoring Program (Planning Application No. 00-0189) for the Harveston Specific Plan - Blue Page 11 Exhibit A - Mitigation Monitoring Program City Council Resolution No. 01 Approving the General Plan Amendment (Planning Application 99-0419) and Specific Plan (Planning Application 99-0418)--Blue Page 12 Exhibit A - General Plan Land Use Map Exhibit B - Specific Plan 13 (Previously Provided) Exhibit C - Conditions of Approval for Specific Plan 13 Exhibit D - General Plan Consistency Analysis City Council Ordinance No. 01- Adopting the Harveston Specific Plan Development Code Amendment and Zoning Standards for the Harveston Specific Plan (Planning Application No. 99-0418)--Blue Page 13 Exhibit A - Harveston Specific Plan Exhibit B - Specific Plan and Zoning Standards City Council Ordinance No. 01- Adopting the amendment to the Official Zoning Map of the City of Temecula (Planning Application 99-0245) --Blue Page 14 Exhibit A - Revised Zoning Map R:\S PXHarveston SPXCity CounciI\STAFFRPT 7-24-01.dcc 9 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. City Council Ordinance No. 01- Approving the Development Agreement (Planning Application 99-0446) with Lennar Communities--Blue Page 15 Exhibit A - Copy of Development Agreement (located in Attachment 10 of this Agenda Report) City Council Resolution No. 01 - Approving Tentative Tract Map 29639---Blue Page 16 Exhibit A- Conditions of Approval for Tentative Tract Map City Council Resolution No. 01 - Approving Tentative Tract Map 29928--Blue Page 17 Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval for Tentative Tract Map 29928 City Council Resolution No. 01- Approving Tentative Tract Map 29929 Blue Page 18 Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval for Tentative Tract Map 29929 City Council Resolution No. 01 - Approving Tentative Tract Map 30088--Blue Page 19 Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval for Tentative Tract Map 30088 Development Agreement and Attachments--Blue Page 20 Planning Commission Staff Report dated June 20, 2001--Blue Page 21 Planning Commission Staff Report dated July 12, 2001--Blue Page 22 Modifications to the Draft Plan being Recommended by the Planning Commission--Blue Page 23 Proposed Land Use Plan for the Harveston Specific Plan --Blue Page 24 General Plan Land Use Acreage Comparisons and Corrected EIR Exhibit 12--Blue Page 25 Correspondence received by the Planning Commission --Blue Page 26 City Response Letter to Channell Commercial - Blue Page 27 Material and Letters concerning School Impact Mitigation-Blue Page 28 Materials and Letters concerning Lake Liability-Blue Page 29 Community Mobility Enhancement Plan - Blue Page 30 R:\S P~Harveston SPxCity CounciI\STAFFR PT 7-24-01,doc 10 A'I'I'ACHMENT NO 1 DRAFT RESOLUTION CERTIFYING THE EIR AND APPROVING THE MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM RSS PkHarveston SP~City CounciI\STAFFRPT 7-24411.doc 11 ATI'ACHMENT NO. 1 RESOLUTION NO. 01 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA CERTIFYING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT PREPARED FOR THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN AND RELATED ACTIONS, AND ADOPTING THE FINDINGS PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS, AND A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM IN CONNECTION THEREWITH FOR THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED EAST OF INTERSTATE 15, NORTH OF SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK, WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD AND SOUTH OF THE NORTHERN CITY LIMTS (PLANNING APPLICATION 00-0189) Statement of Findings of Fact Pursuant to CEQA Guideline Section 15091 For the Harveston Specific Plan WHEREAS, the Harveston Specific Plan and related actions ("Specific Plan"), initiated and prepared on behalf of the City of Temecula. The Harveston Specific Plan proposes the development of a 549.5-acre planned community in the City of Temecula. The Project site is located adjacent to and east of Interstate 15 Freeway (I-15) in the City of Temecula, California, in southwest Riverside County, south of the City of Los Angeles and north of the City of San Diego. From the 1-15, direct access to the project site is provided by Winchester Road (Highway 79 North) and Ynez Road, both located near the southern boundary of the site, and Margarita Road, which runs along the eastern boundary of the site. Winchester Road runs near the southern edge of the project site and continues north adjacent to Chaparral High School. The proposed Specific Plan is divided into 12 planning areas in an effort to create a distinct cluster of future uses/activities and to identify potential time frames for individual project development to occur in a timely manner, within the overall Specific Plan concept. The Harveston Specific Plan proposes a maximum of 1,921 dwelling units (1,621 single family and 300 multi family rental units). The project will consist of 150.9 acres of Iow medium density residential (3-5 du/acre), 79.1 acres of medium 1 density residential (5-7 du/acre), 60.0 acres of medium 2 density residential (7-13 du/acre), and 16.8 acres of high-density residential (13-20 du/acre). Other components of the project include a 13-acre mixed-use zone overlaying area designated as village center, which allows uses such as retail, restaurant, office, daycare, worship, and private clubhouse; a 112.5-acre service commercial area; a 16.5-acre community park, a 12.0-acre elementary school; a 17.3-acre lake/lake park; a 1.8-acre village green; 60.2- acre of major streets and slopes, and two 1.3 and 2.5-acre excluded parcels (Specific Plan, p. 3-5 through 3-10). WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), the City is the lead agency for the Specific Plan as the public agency with both general governmental powers and the principle responsibility for implementing the Specific Plan; and, WHEREAS, a Notice of Preparation of a Draft Environmental Impact Report ("Draft EIR") was issued on April 1, 1999, inviting comments from responsible agencies, other regulatory agencies, organizations and individuals pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines section 15082; and, 1 R:\S P'xHarveston SPeCify CounciruRESO CC EIR Findings.doc WHEREAS, written statements were received by the City in response to the Notice of Preparation, which assisted the City in narrowing the issues and alternatives for analysis in the Draft EIR; and, WHEREAS, a Draft EIR was prepared by the City pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines section 15168 to analyze potential adverse environmental impacts of Specific Plan implementation pursuant to CEQA; and, WHEREAS, upon completion of the Draft EIR dated November 2, 2000, the City initiated a 45- day public comment period by filing a Notice of Completion with the State Office of Planning and Research in November 2, 2000; and, WHEREAS, the City also published a Notice of Availability for the Draft EIR in a newspaper of general cimulation. Copies of the Draft EIR were sent to public agencies, organizations, and individuals. In addition, the City placed copies of the Draft EIR in public libraries in Riverside County and made copies available for review at City offices; and, WHEREAS, during and before the official public review period for the Draft EIR, the City received 14 written comments, all of which were responded to by the City. Those comments and the responses are included as part of the Final Environmental Impact Report/Response to Comments document ("Final EIR"); and, WHEREAS, on November 1, 2000, December 20, 2000, January 17, 2001, and January 31, 2001, Planning Commission workshops and on January 24, 2001 and January 27, 2001, Community Workshops were conducted to provide information about the Specific Plan; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21092.5, the City provided its responses to all commentors on February, 2001; and, WHEREAS, Section 15091 of the State CEQA Guidelines prevents the City from approving or carrying out a project for which an EIR has been completed that identifies any significant environmental effects unless the City makes one or more of the following written finding(s) for each of those significant effects accompanied by a brief explanation of the rationale for each finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects as identified in the final EIR; or, (2) Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and not the agency making the finding. Such changes have been adopted by such other agency or can and should be adopted by such other agency; or, (3) Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the final EIR; and, 2 R:~S P'xHarveston SP',City CouncilR~,ESO CC EIR Findings.doc WHEREAS, Section 15093 of the State CEQA Guidelines requires that if the Specific Plan will cause significant unavoidable adverse impacts, the City must adopt a Statement of Overriding Considerations prior to approving the project. A Statement of Overriding Considerations states that any significant adverse project effects are acceptable if expected project benefits outweigh unavoidable adverse environmental impacts; and, WHEREAS, environmental impacts identified in the Final EIR which the Planning Commission finds are less than significant and do not require mitigation are described in Section 2 hereof; and, WHEREAS, environmental impacts identified in the Final EIR as potentially significant, but which the Planning Commission finds can be mitigated to a less than significant level through the imposition of mitigation measures and/or conditions identified in the Final EIR and Specific Plan and set forth herein are described in Section 3 hereof; and, WHEREAS, environmental impacts identified in the Final EIR as potentially significant but which the Planning Commission finds cannot be fully mitigated to a less than significant level despite the imposition of all feasible mitigation measures described in Section 4 hereof, and, WHEREAS, alternatives to the Specific Plan that might eliminate or reduce significant environmental impacts are described in Section 5; and, WHEREAS, a discussion of Specific Plan benefits identified by City staff and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for the environmental impacts that cannot be fully mitigated to a less than significant level are set forth in Section 6 hereof; and, WHEREAS, Public Resources Code section 21081.6 requires the City to prepare and adopt a mitigation monitoring and reporting program for any project for which mitigation measures have been imposed to assure compliance with the adopted mitigation measures; and, WHEREAS, prior to taking action, the Planning Commission has heard, been presented with, reviewed and considered all of the information and data in the administrative record including the Final EIR, and all oral and written testimony presented to it during meetings and hearings. The Final EIR reflects the independent judgment of the Planning Commission and is deemed adequate for purposes of making decisions on the merits of the Specific Plan and related actions. No comments or any additional information submitted to the City have produced any substantial new information requiring cimulation or additional environmental review of the Final EIR under CEQA, nor do the minor modifications to the Final EIR require additional public review because no new significant environmental impacts were identified, no substantial increase in the severity of any environmental impacts would occur. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council hereby determines the following: Section 1. Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula determined that based on all of the evidence presented, including the Final EIR, written and oral testimony given at meetings and hearings, and submission of testimony from the public, organizations, and regulatory agencies, the environmental impacts associated with the Harveston Specific Plan will have a less than significant impact through the Initial Study: 3 R:~S P~-Iarveston SP~City Council~F. SO CC EIR Findings.doc A. Agricultural Resources. According to the General Plan, the project site is considered farmland of local importance; however, it is not considered prime or unique farmland, or farmland of Statewide Importance pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency. The site currently is not zoned for agriculture use, is not under a Williamson Act Contract, nor is it located within an Agricultural Preserve. None of the surrounding properties support long-term productive agricultural activities (Initial Study, p. 5). B. Mineral Resources. No mineral resources are known to occur within the project boundaries (Initial Study, p. 10). C. Population/Housing/Employment. The buildout of the Harveston Specific Plan is accounted for in the General Plan and future growth scenarios for the City. However, there will be extensions of infrastructure associated with this project. The project will serve as an attractor for additional growth in the local area or region. Population The proposed project will provide a maximum of 1,921 new housing units in the City of Temecula. Based on the current population generation factor (Temecula Subdivision Ordinance) of 2.85 persons per single family unit and 2.43 persons per multi-family unit, the project is expected to generate a residential population of 5,349 new residents (Draft EIR, p. 5- 164). The proposed project is consistent with the regional population projections of the Southern California Association of Government (SCAG) and does not exceed the 6,205 persons forecasted by SCAG for the project, as set forth in the Regional Comprehensive Plan and Guide and the Subregional Comprehensive Plan prepared by the Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG) (Final EIR, p. 2-20). According to the General Plan, at buildout, the area within the City limits will have 39,658 dwelling units and a population of 112,254 persons. By providing 5,349 persons, the project will enable the City to provide housing to meet the needs of this expected population growth. Therefore, the level of population generation is consistent with the General Plan and is not considered significant. Housing The project will add 1,921 dwelling units to the City's existing housing stock. The project is consistent with the City's land use policies contained in the City of Temecula General Plan. The project proposes single family and multi-family units with a range of different densities, which will provide housing opportunities for a range of people. The provision of housing of this type is consistent with the City's objective to encourage the provision of adequate sites for housing (City of Temecula, 1994-1999 Housing Element, p. 4-42). In addition, the development of the housing units proposed in the project would help the City to achieve its 1998-2005 Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) number as determined by SCAG and WRCOG. The RHNA is a key tool for SCAG and WRCOG to plan for projected growth in the region. As specified by the RHNA, the City of Temecula has a projected housing need for 7,798 housing units during the 1998-2005 period (WRCOG, July 23, 1999). Since the project is consistent with the Temecula General Plan City land use policies, impact will be less than significant (Final EIR, p. 2-20). 4 R:\S P~Harveston SP\City Council~RESO CC EIR Findings.doc Employment In a regional context, the Harveston site lies within the WRCOG Subregion, which is defined by SCAG to be housing-rich and jobs-poor (Regional Comprehensive Plan and Guide, SCAG, 1994). SCAG projects a jobs/housing ratio of 0.99 for the year 2015. The project is expected to create 1,400 jobs in the service commemial and neighborhood mixed uses (i.e., retail, restaurant, etc.) within the Mixed Use Village Center. Although the project will result in the development of residential units in an already housing-rich subregion, SCAG projects a housing-rich ratio for the subregion in 2015. Therefore, the project is is not in conflict with the SCAG projections. Additionally, SCAG's regional growth management policies are based on the adopted General Plan development projections. As discussed above, the Harveston project is consistent with the City of Temecula General Plan. Furthermore, according to the General Plan EIR, the jobs/housing balance is measured on a citywide basis rather than a project specific basis, and as a whole, Temecula's land use policy works toward achieving regional jobs/housing goals (City of Temecula General Plan EIR, p. 199). Implementation of the Specific Plan project would be growth-inducing in terms of a localized employment increase. However, the increase in local employment is a major goal of the City's General Plan (Draft EIR, p. 7-1). Section 2. Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula determined that based on all of the evidence presented, including the Final EIR, written and oral testimony given at meetings and hearings, and submission of testimony from the public, organizations, and regulatory agencies, the environmental impacts associated with the Harveston Specific Plan will have a less than significant impact through the EIR and therefore do not require the imposition of mitigation measures: A. Land Use Compatibility. The 549.5-acre site currently consists of vacant land once used for cattle and sheep grazing. The proposed Harveston project site is surrounded by existing and proposed/approved developments (Draft EIR, p.5-3). The proposed project will result in the development of single family residential, multi family residential, service commercial, retail commemial, community park, lake, lake park, trails, and school site, which will establish new land use relationships with adjacent land uses. These uses proposed are consistent with the density and intensities of the City of Temecula General Plan Land Use Plan (Draft EIR, p.5-14). Due to the overall design of the proposed Harveston project, no significant impact, including on- and off-site land use relationships, were identified in this area (Draft EIR, p. 5-15 and 5-18). The proposed project will not result in conflicts or inconsistencies with the applicable goals and policies of the Land Use, Circulation, Housing, Open Space/Conservation, Growth Management/Public Facilities, Public Safety, Noise, Air Quality, Community Design, and Economic Development Elements of the City of Temecula General Plan. Additionally, no impacts to the City of Temecula Development Code are anticipated (Draft EIR, p. 5-19 through 5-23). The proposed project in conjunction with other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects will incrementally contribute to the cumulative impact of development in the area. However, the proposed project is consistent with the City of Temecula General Plan, City Development Code and Subdivision Ordinance and Citywide design guidelines. Therefore, no significant cumulative land use consistency impacts are anticipated. (Draft EIR, p. 5-3). 5 R:~S P~Flarveston SP\City Councir,,RESO CC EIR Findings.doc B. Transportation and Circulation - Emergency Access and Parking Emergency Access The proposed project will improve local circulation (including emergency access) as well as access to nearby uses by providing needed roadway and intersection improvements. The circulation portion of the Specific Plan will help provide adequate access for local residents and emergency vehicles. Parking The proposed public facilities (e.g., parks, schools) will provide adequate onsite parking, so no offsite parking should be impacted. The circulation portion of the Specific Plan will provide for adequate parking both in terms of numbers of spaces and location. There will be no construction parking on adjacent streets; therefore, offsite parking impacts would not be significant. C. Air Quality. Construction activities generate evaporative emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOC) from paints, solvents, asphalt, roofing tar and other coatings. Through compliance with SCAQMD regulations on paint volatility, and with the anticipated rate of project completion, ROGNOC emission impacts will be less than significant (Draft EIR, p. 5- 98). Through compliance with SCAQMD regulations on paint volatility, and with the anticipated rate of project completion, the project's incremental contribution to ROG / VOC emission impacts will be less than significant (Draft EIR, p. 5-103). D. Noise. The project noise impact study indicated that off-site noise impacts will be individually and cumulatively less than significant. Additionally, the noise impacts on the site from the French Valley Airport are considered to be less than significant (Draft EIR, p. 5-120). E. Biological Resources. 1. Potential Project Impacts to Biological Resources (General Impacts). Implementation of the proposed project would not remove or alter any significant natural or native vegetation formations on the property because they do not currently exist on site. The site contains no natural wetland habitat or other sensitive natural assemblages. No natural plant communities or natural populations of native species would be affected, directly or indirectly, by the proposed development. The project would generate no direct significant adverse impacts to natural wildlife habitats on a local or regional scale (Draft EIR, p. 5-155). At least one native raptorial bird species, the red-tailed hawk, uses the site as foraging habitat. However, foraging habitat for raptor species is not regionally unique, therefore the loss of this resource would not be considered a significant impact (Draft EIR, p. 5-156). 2. Impacts to Sensitive Species. No sensitive (rare or endangered) plant, invertebrate, fish, amphibian, reptile, bird or mammal species are known or expected to reside within, or occur in a resource-dependant relationship with, any portion of the overall site. Although the proposed project occurs within the SKR Habitat Conservation Plan Area, this species is highly unlikely to occur onsite and implementation of the SKR mitigation fees will reduce potential impacts to a level less than significant. Additionally, the focused survey for the QCB revealed that there are no QCB occurring on this parcel and therefore no impacts from development would occur (Draft EIR, p. 5-156). 6 R:XS P~larveston SPXCity Council",RESO CC EIR Findings.doc The proposed project will not result in impacts to sensitive (rare or endangered) plant or animal species as none has been identified as occurring onsite (Draft EIR, p.5-157). F. Cumulative Impacts (Land Use, Aesthetics and Geology) The Temecula General Plan EIR examined impacts associated with build out within the corporate city limits, its sphere of influence, and a larger "area of interest." The Harveston Specific Plan is accounted for within the total unit count. Regional growth plans were also examined in evaluating cumulative impacts on a regional basis (Final EIR, p. 2-20). The General Plan policies and standards which serve as mitigation measures for the potential cumulative effects of all development under the General Plan have been applied to the Harveston Specific Plan whenever applicable. Among the many General Plan policies applied to the Harveston Specific Plan are the following (Final EIR, p. 2-20 and Specific Plan, Appendix A): Incorporating the village concept into large master-planned developments; Providing development standards that ensure high quality design; Incorporating pedestrian and bicycle trails into project design; Providing adequate circulation improvements to support the level of development proposed; and Establishing setbacks along AIquist-Priolo Special Studies zones; The incorporation of the General Plan policies and standards in the Specific Plan from the start have ensured that land use, aesthetic and geology cumulative impacts associated with the development are less than significant (Specific Plan, Appendix A). Land Use The proposed project in conjunction with other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects will incrementally contribute to the cumulative impact of development in the area. The potential development of the project is consistent with the City of Temecula General Plan, City of Temecula Development Code and Subdivision Ordinance and Citywide Design Guidelines. No significant cumulative land use consistency impacts are anticipated (Draft EIR, p. 5-23). Aesthetics The project in conjunction with other proposed or on-going projects occur within an urbanizing area. The City of Temecula General Plan designates the area for urban uses. Development will result in changes to the appearance of the landscape as viewed from public roads. Proposed cumulative development will also contribute to cumulative night lighting and daytime glare and reflective impacts. Because the proposed development is a master planned community with detailed Specific Plan Design Guidelines and is anticipated by the General Plan, and it is a continuation of existing land use patterns, the project's incremental cumulative aesthetic impact is not considered significant (Draft EIR, p. 5-31) 7 R:XS l:~I-Iarveston SP',City Council~RESO CC EIR Findings.doc Geology and Soils Generally, geotechnical issues are sit-specific and will be limited to within the development boundaries of the Specific Plan site; therefore, no cumulative geotechnical impacts are anticipated (Draft EIR, p. 5-131). Section 3. The City Council hereby finds that mitigation measures outlined in the Draft EIR have been incorporated into the Harveston Specific Plan that avoid or substantially lessen the following potentially significant environmental impacts identified in the Specific Plan Draft EiR to a less than significant level. The potentially significant project impacts and the mitigation measures which have been adopted to mitigate them to a less than significant level are as follows: A. Aesthetics / Light and Glare 1. Potential Significant Impact. The project site is currently undeveloped. Implementation of the Harveston project will alter the aesthetic character of the area. The project's development could potentially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surrounding; however, the proposed project includes features, which help avoid potential aesthetic impacts. These features include consideration of residential planned development with comprehensive landscaping plans, and other site design proposals (i.e., expanded landscaped parkways along the perimeter roadways and aesthetically pleasing wall treatments) which will minimize the aesthetic impacts of the project (Draft EIR, p.5-30). Aesthetic compatibility and light pollution are potentially significant impacts. While the Specific Plan includes provisions to ensure quality design and compatibility, ongoing review and monitoring will be required to avoid potential impact. The proposed community park will include ball fields and lighting associated with sporting activities. The "sky glow" condition emanating from the proposed development may impact the Mount Palomar Observatory. A potential exists for a significant aesthetic impact if the project results in substantial light and glare (Draft EIR, p. 2-3,4) 2. Findings. Implementation of the following mitigation measures will reduce potential aesthetic impacts to a less than significant level: a. During development plan review process, all architectural and landscape design plans and plant palettes shall be reviewed and approved by the City. (Draft EIR, p.5-32) b. Prior to the issuance of building permits for Phase 2, the community park lighting shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Services Director as part of the review process of the construction plans. (Draft EIR, p. 5-32) c. The Master Developer shall provide the prospective homebuyers a notice that the 16-acre community park will include sports field lighting for evening use. Proof of this notification shall be provided to the Planning Director prior issuance of building permits. (Draft EIR, p.5-32) d. In order to mitigate potential impacts to the Mt. Palomar Observatory, all lighting shall be reviewed by the City to assure utilization of Iow pressure sodium vapor lamps; shielding to prevent upward illumination; and compliance with the Ordinance No. 655. (Draft EIR, p.5-32) R:~ P~Harveston SP\City Council~RESO CC EIR Findings.doc 3. Supporting Explanation. The following details from the Draft EIR and Specific Plan illustrate that the project will not have any significant impact upon aesthetics and that any potential aesthetic impact will be reduced to a less than significant level through requirements and standards in the Specific Plan and the mitigation measure identified above: The proposed Harveston project shall comply with the applicable codes and standards including the California building Code, Uniform Fire Code, etc. Compliance with the City's standards shall assure safe utilization of the facilities at night by the public (Draft EIR, p. 5-32). With implementation of the above mitigation measures, no significant impacts related to aesthetics and light and glare are anticipated (Draft EIR, p. 5-32). B. Transportation / Circulation 1. Potentially Significant Impact Phase I -2002 Scenario: Under this scenario there will be an increase in traffic levels. At Phase I buildout the project is anticipated to generate approximately 12,515 trips per day (Draft EIR, p. 5-43). When project-related traffic is added to the 2002 background traffic, all of the study intersections are found to operate at Level of Service D or better except for the two intersections, Winchester Road/Ynez Road and Winchester Road/Margarita Road. This is considered a significant impact. Intersection improvements have been identified that would allow Level of Service D or better to be maintained at both intersections and reduce this impact to a less than significant level. The additional left-turn opportunity would also improve the current operation of both intersections. Please refer to Mitigation Measure 1 below in Section 3.2.2, which requires the project's implementation of these intersection improvements (Draft EIR, p.5-45). In addition to improvements proposed at the two intersections mentioned above, the Phase I project traffic generated by the Harveston project would require additional intersection and roadway improvements in order to achieve acceptable service levels. The onsite roadway improvements (see Mitigation Measures 2a and 2b) are part of the Harveston project's Circulation Plan (Draft EIR, P. 5-50). Project Buildout - 2005 Scenario: Under this scenario there will be an increase in traffic levels. Based on the assumed land uses, the entire project (both components) would generate approximately 41,767 daily vehicle trips. It should be noted that at project buildout the residential planned community component of the Specific Plan generates 17,678 daily trips or 42% of the total 41,767 daily trips and the service commercial component generates 24,089 daily trips or 58% of the total daily trips (Draft EIR, p. 5-41). The HCM analysis indicates that with the project, a total of ten off-site intersections would result in a level of Service F during one or both of the peak hours. Since the project's traffic contributes incrementally to this cumulative impact, it will be responsible for its fair-share of the improvements. With the implementation of Mitigation Measure 3 below in Section 3.2.2, the project's incremental impact can be reduced to a less than significant level (Draft EIR, p. 5-60). In addition to the off-site intersection improvements, the 2005 with project build-out scenario will require the additional intersection and roadway improvements in the immediate project vicinity to accommodate project traffic access and to achieve acceptable service levels. The on-site roadway improvements (see Mitigation Measures 4a and 4b) are part of the Harveston project's Cimulation Plan (Draft EIR, p. 5-74). The impact is mitigated with project improvements and mitigation measures (Mitigation Measures 3 through 5) (Draft EIR, p.5-82 and 83). R:~S PXHarveston SP\City CouncilW. ESO CC EIR Findings.doc Additionally, the currently adopted Temecula Circulation Plan is no longer consistent with the adopted City of Murrieta Circulation Plan which shows a Cherry Street alignment. Although the project site plan evaluated in this Traffic Impact Analysis proposes a circulation system, which is consistent with the currently adopted Circulation Plan for Temecula, the onsite circulation could be easily modified to accommodate and facilitate implementation of the Alternative Draft Proposed Circulation Plan if it is adopted. The modifications necessary to provide consistency with the Draft Circulation Plan would not measurably alter the offsite impacts and improvement needs that have been identified in the EIR Traffic section. Because the adoption of the City's Draft Proposed Circulation Plan may occur subsequent to the City's action on the proposed project, Mitigation Measure 6 has been proposed to ensure that the Harveston project's implementation would not prevent implementation of the City's Draft Circulation Plan (Draft EIR, p. 5-77). Traffic Demand and Systems Management The existing site does not now provide alternative transportation opportunities for area residents. The circulation portion of the Specific Plan will provide for alternate transportation opportunities. The project site does not presently provide access for pedestrians or bicyclists due to its unimproved condition and isolated location. The circulation plan of the Specific Plan provides both pedestrian and bicycle circulation for area residents as well as project visitors. This proposed network of sidewalks and trails will provide non-vehicular access to the service commercial area, onsite and offsite schools, the extensive park and recreation system and the mixed use Village Center. The proposed sidewalks and Class II bike lanes on Margarita Road will eventually allow non-vehicular access offsite, and will tie into trails along Santa Gertrudis Creek. A separate transit plan, bicycle plan and open space / recreation plan (which includes trails) have all been included in the Specific Plan. Mitigation Measures 7 through 9 will help reduce vehicle trips and traffic congestion (Draft EIR, p. 5-76). 2. Findings. Implementation of the following mitigation measures will reduce Phase I project traffic impacts to a less than significant level: Phase 1 Scenario - Year 2002 a. Prior to issuance of Ist occupancy permit for Phase I Residential and 1st occupancy permit for Phase I service commercial, the developer(s) shall implement the improvements for intersections 28, 29, 30A, 30B and 31 outlined in Table 6, Exhibits 26A-26C of this EIR, and listed below. Prior to issuance of 326th occupancy permits for the Phase I Residential and more than 8 acres of Phase I Service Commercial development (i.e. the southern portion of Planning Area 12), the developer(s) shall implement the improvements for intersections 4 and 5 outlined in Table 6, Exhibits 26A-26C of this EIR, and listed below. City may review and adopt a funding mechanism for the improvement costs above the Project percentage for 'lair share" consistent with Section 12.3 of the Specific Plan, the "Financing Mechanism". 10 R:~S PXHarveston SP~City Council~ESO CC EIR Findings.doc Intersection Improvement Needs 2002 With Project Phase I ID No. [ Intersection I Improvements I Project % Prior to issuance of 1st Occupancy Permit for Phase I Residential and lS' Occupancy Permit for Phase I Service Commercial 28 Rustic Glen Dr @ (1 ) Add EB Left Turn Lane Margarita Rd (2) Add EB Shared Through and Right Turn Lane (3) Add NB Left Turn Lane (4) Add NB Through Lane (5) Modify WB Right Turn Lane to Shared Through 100% and Right Turn Lane (6) Add SB Through Lane (7) Add SB Right Turn Lane (8) Modify Signal to Accommodate New EB Approach 29 Margarita Rd @ (1) Add NB Left Turn Lane South Project (2) Add SB Right Turn Lane Residential (3) Add EB Left Turn Lane 100% (4) Add EB Right Turn Lane (Dual) (5) Install Traffic Signal 30A South Project (1) Add EB Through Lane Residential Access Rd Inbound @ Internal (2) Add NB Left Turn Lane 100% Loop Access Rd (3) Add NB Right Turn Lane (4) Add WB Through Lane (5) Install Traffic Signal 30B South Project (1) Add EB Through Lane Residential Access Rd Outbound @ Internal (2) Add EB Right Turn Lane Loop Access Rd (3) Add WB Through Lane 100% (4) Add WB Right Turn Lane (5) No Intersection Controls Needed 31 East Project (1) Add NB Through Lane Residential Access Rd @ Internal Loop (2) Add NB Right Turn Lane Access Rd (3) Add WB Left Turn Lane 100% (4) Add WB Right Turn Lane (5) Add SB Through Lane (6) Add SB Left Turn Lane (7) Install Stop Signs on WB Approach Prior to issuance of 326tn Occupancy Permit for Phase I residential and more than 8 acres of Phase I Service Commercial 4 Winchestbr Rd @ (1) Modify Signal to Provide NB Right Turn Ynez Rd Overlap Phase (2) Modify Signal to Provide SB Right Turn 45% Overlap Phase (3) Add EB Through Lane 5 Winchester Rd @ (1) Modify Signal to Provide SB Right Turn 51% Margarita Rd Overlap Phase (2) Add EB Left Turn Lane H R:',S P'xHarveston SP~City CouncilXRESO CC EIR Findings.doc b. Prior to issuance of occupancy permits for Phase I, the developer(s) shall implement the Roadway Improvement Needs identified below. Exhibit 10, Development and Roadway Phasing Plan identifies the proposed timing for on-site Roadway Improvement Needs. A program for the improvements listed below with an ..... shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City and the developer (Draft EIR, p.5-81). Complete 4-lane widening of Margarita Road to Arterial highway standards between Santa Gertrudis Creek and Date Street.* The proposed South Residential Access Road and Loop access Road will be constructed to provide adequate access to the first phase of the Harveston project. This will include at a minimum, the following key on-site circulation components: South Residential Access Road, which provides two lanes in each direction with provisions for a median left-turn lane at the intersection with Margarita Road. East Residential Access Road (i.e., extension of Rustic Glen), which provides one lane in each direction with provisions for a median left turn lane at margarita Road and the internal Loop Access Road. Loop Access Road, which provides a single lane in each direction with a center two-way left-turn lane. Additionally, turn lanes may be needed at key intersections (refer to Exhibits 26A-26C). Curbside parking should not generally be provided along the internal Loop Access Road except where required by the City of Temecula. The provision of curb parking should consider sight distance limitationS, which may occur along the interior of the Loop Access Road. Bike lanes shall be provided on the three principal on-site roadway described above. c. Prior to issuance of occupancy permits for Phase I, the developer(s) shall pay the City's established DIF, less any DIF credits applicable to the project. In lieu of the DIF payment, at the City's discretion, the developer(s) may implement the off-site Improvement Needs identified previously in Mitigation Measures 1 and 2a above (Draft EIR, p.5- 82). 3. Findings. Implementation of the following mitigation measures will reduce project Build-Out traffic impacts to a less than significant level: Proiect Build-Out Scenario - Year 2005 a. Prior to the issuance of occupancy permits for the Phase II build- out of Residential (i.e., beyond 476 single family units and 346 multi-family units) and Service Commercial (i.e., beyond 20 net acres in Planning Area 12), and Village Center neighborhood commercial (i.e., beyond 8,000 square feet), the developer(s) shall pay their fair-share improvement costs for the intersection improvements outlined in Table 8 of this EIR and listed below. The specific timing of project 2005 build-out improvements (Phase 2 through Phase 4) shall be consistent with the Traffic Mitigation Monitoring Program (TMMP), as required in Mitigation Measure 5 below. 12 R:~S P~Harveston SP~City Council~ESO CC EIR Findings.doc Intersection Improvement Needs 2005 WITH PROJECT BUILD-OUT SCENARIO ID No. IIntersection Improvements Project % 1 Winchester Rd @ (1) Add EB Right Turn Lane Jefferson Ave (2) Add NB Right Turn Lane (Dual Right) (3) Add Southbound Left Turn Lane 16% (4) Convert SB Right Turn Lane to Shared Through and Right Turn Lane 2 Winchester Rd @ (1) Add EB Right Turn Lane 1-15 Southbound (2) Add SB Dedicated Left Turn Lane (Dual Left) and 23% Ramp Widen Off Ramp to Accommodate the Added Lane 4 Winchester Rd @ (1) Add EB Left Turn Lane (Dual Left) Ynez Rd (2) Add EB Through Lane (3) Modify NB Through Lane to Shared Through and Left Turn Lane (4) Modify Signal to Provide NB Right Turn Overlap 62% Phase (5) Split NB and SB Signal Phases (6) Add WB Through Lane (7) Add SB Shared Through and Right Turn Lane 5 Winchester Rd @ (1) Modify Signal to Provide SB Right Turn Overlap Margarita Rd Phase (2) Modify Signal to Provide NB Right Turn Overlap 42% Phase (3) Add EB Left Turn Lane (Dual) 10 Murrieta Hot Springs (1) Add WB Left Turn Lane (Dual) Rd. @ Jefferson Ave (2) Channelize NB Right Turn Lane to Allow Free 4% Right Turn Movement 12 Murrieta Hot Springs (1) Add WB Right Turn Lane Rd @ Alta Murata Dr (2) Modify WB Shared Through and Right Turn Lane 21% to Through Lane 13 Murrieta Hot Springs (1) Modify EB Through Lane to Shared Through and Rd @ Margarita Rd Right Turn Lane (2) Modify NB Through Lane to Shared Through and 43% Left Turn Lane 18 Overland Dr @ (1) Modify Signal to Provide WB Right Turn Overlap Jefferson Ave Phase (2) Modify Signal to Provide NB Right Turn Overlap 14% Phase (3) Split NB and SB Signal Phases (4) Add EB Right Turn Lane 19 Overland Dr @ (1 ) Add WB Right Turn Lane Ynez Rd (2) Modify WB Shared Through and Right Turn Lane to Through Lane 27% (3) Modify Signal to Provide WB Right Turn Overlap Phase (4) Modify Signal to Provide SB Right Turn Overlap Phase 26 Overland Dr @ (1) Modify NB Through Lane to Shared Through and Margarita Rd Left Turn Lane 100% (2) Split NB and SB Signal Phases 13 R:\S PLHarveston SP\City CouncilhRESO CC EIR Findings.doc Intersection Improvement Needs 2005 WITH PROJECT BUILD-OUT SCENARIO ID No. Intersection Improvements Project % 28 Rustic Glen Dr @ (1 ) Add EB Left Turn Lane Margarita Rd (2) Add EB Shared Through and Right Turn Lane (3) Add NB Left Turn Lane (4) Add NB Through Lane (5) Modify WB Right Turn Lane to Shared Through 100% and Right Turn Lane (6) Add SB Through Lane (7) Add SB Right Turn Lane (8) Modify Signal to Accommodate New EB Approach 30A South Project - (1) Add EB Through Lane Residential Access (2) Add NB Left Turn Lane Rd Inbound @ (3) Add NB Right Turn Lane 100% Internal Loop Access (4) Add WB Through Lane Rd. (5) Install Stop Signs on EB and WB Approaches 30B South Project Resi- (1) Add EB Through Lane dential Access Rd. (2) Add EB Right Turn Lane Outbound @ Internal (3) Add WB Through Lane 100% Loop Access Rd (4) Add WB Right Turn Lane (5) No Intersection Controls Needed 31 East Project (1) Add NB Through Lane Residential Access (2) Add NB Right Turn Lane Rd. @ Internal Loop (3) Add WB Left Turn Lane Access Rd (4) Add WB Right Turn Lane 100% (5) Add SB Through Lane (6) Add SB Left Turn Lane (7) Install Stop Sign on WB Approach 32 Date St @ Ynez Rd (1 ) Add 3 EB Through Lanes (2) Add EB Left Turn Lane (3) Add EB Right Turn Lane (4) Add 2 NB Through Lanes (5) Add NB Left Turn Lane (6) Add NB Right Turn Lane 42% (7) Add 2 WB Through Lanes (8) Add 2 WB Left Turn Lanes (Dual Left) (9) Add WB Right Turn Lane (10) Add 2 SB Through Lanes (11) Add SB Left Turn Lane (12) Add SB Right Turn Lane (13) Install Traffic Signal 33 Date St @ Service (1) Add NB Through Lane Commercial Access I (2) Add NB Right Turn Lane (3) Add WB Left Turn Lane (4) Add WB Right Turn Lane 100% (5) Add SB Through Lane (6) Add SB Left Turn Lane (7) Install Stop Signs on NB and SB Approaches 14 R:~ l:~Harveston SP~City CouncilLRESO CC EIR Findings.doc Intersection Improvement Needs 2005 WITH PROJECT BUILD-OUT SCENARIO ID No. Intersection Improvements Project % 34 Date St @ North (1 ) Add 2 EB Through Lanes Project Residential (2) Add EB Left Turn Lane Access Rd (3) Add EB Right Turn Lane (4) Add NB Shared Through and Left Turn Lane (5) Add NB Left Turn Lane (6) Add NB Right Turn Lane 76% (7) Add 2 WB Through Lanes (8) Add WB Left Turn Lane (9) Add WB Right Turn Lane (10) Add SB Shared Through and Right Turn Lane (11) Add SB Left Turn Lane (12) Install Traffic Signal 35 North Project (1) Add EB Through Lane Residential Access (2) Add EB Left Turn Lane Rd. Internal Loop (3) Add WB Through Lane Access Rd (4) Add WB Right Turn Lane 100% (5) Add SB Left Turn Lane (6) Add SB Right Turn Lane (7) Install Stop Signs on EB and WB Approaches 36 Ynez Rd @ (1 ) Add EB Through Lane Service Commercial (2) Add EB Right Turn Lane Access II (3) Add NB Left Turn Lane (4) Add NB Right Turn Lane 100% (5) Add WB Through Lane (6) Add WB Left Turn Lane (7) Install Stop Signs on EB and WB Approaches 37 Ynez Rd @ (1) Add EB Right Turn Lane Service Commercial (2) Add 2 NB Through Lanes Access III (3) Add NB Left Turn Lane 77% (4) Add 2 SB Through Lanes (5) Add SB Right Turn Lane (6) Install Stop Sign on EB Approach 38 Ynez Rd @ (1) Add EB Shared Through and Right Turn Lane Service Commemial (2) Add EB Left Turn Lane Access IV (3) Add 2 NB Through Lanes 86% (4) Add NB Left Turn Lane (5) Add NB Right Turn Lane (6) Add WB Shared Through and Right Turn Lane (7) Add WB Left Turn Lane (8) Add 2 SB Through Lanes 86% (9) Add SB Left Turn Lane (10) Add SB Right Turn Lane (11) Install Traffic Signal 15 R:\S P~Harveston SP~City Council~RESO CC EIR Findings.doc Intersection Improvement Needs 2005 WITH PROJECT BUILD-OUT SCENARIO ID No. Intersection Improvements Project % 39 Date St @ (1 ) Add EB Shared Through and Left Turn Lane Margarita Rd (2) Add EB Left Turn Lane (3) Add EB Right Turn Lane (4) Add 2 NB Through Lanes (5) Add NB Left Turn Lane (6) Add NB Right Turn Lane (7) Add WB Shared Through and Right Turn Lane 37% (8) Add WB Left Turn Lane (9) Add SB Through Lane (10) Add SB Shared Through and Right Turn Lane (11 ) Add SB Left Turn Lane (12) Add SB Right Turn Lane (13) Install Traffic Signal b. Prior to issuance of occupancy permits for the build-out of residential and service commercial (Planning Area 12), the developer(s) shall implement the Roadway Improvement Needs identified below. Exhibit 10, Development Phasing Plan identifies the proposed timing for On-site Roadway Improvement Needs. A fair-share program for the improvements listed below with an * may be completed to the satisfaction of the City and the developer (Draft EIR, p.5-85, 86). Construct Date Street between the Service Commercial Access Driveway and Margarita Road as a 6-lane restricted access Urban Arterial. The exact alignment of Date Street (or Cherry Street) needs to be coordinated with study efforts related to the proposed future Date Street (or Cherry Street) interchange. · Realign and extend Ynez Road from current terminus to just south of Date Street as a 4- lane Major. · Construct Ynez Road from the northern project boundary to just south of Date Street as a 4-lane Arterial. Construct the North Residential Access Road between Date Street and the internal Loop Access Road as a 4-lane road with provisions for a median left-turn lane at the intersection with Date Street. Construct the internal Loop Access road as a two-lane roadway with center two-way left turn lane. Curbside parking shall not generally be provided along the Loop Access Road except where required by the City of Temecula. The provision of curb parking shall consider right distance limitations that may occur along the interior side of the Loop Access Road. · Bike lanes shall be provided along the Loop Access Road and all three project access roads from Date Street and margarita Road. 16 R:~S P~Harveston SP~City Councirug, ESO CC EIR Findings.doc c. Prior to issuance of occupancy permits for the build-out of residential and service commercial (Planning Area 12), the developer(s) shall pay the City's established DIF, less any available DIF credits. In lieu of the DIF payment, at the City's discretion, the developer(s) may implement the off-site Roadway Improvement Needs identified previously in Mitigation Measures 3 and 4a above (Draft EIR, p.5-86). d. Prior to the recordation of the first map or the approval of the first development application in Planning Area 12, whichever occurs first, the land area required for the future interchange (approximately 10 acres) shall be dedicated to the City of Temecula. e. Consistent with the City's Circulation Element policies, the Harveston project shall implement a Traffic Mitigation Monitoring Program (TMMP) related to the project's traffic impacts. This program would include a series of focused traffic studies that address the potential incremental traffic impacts and roadway system needs associated with subsequent development phases of the project. The EIR traffic study has identified the project- related traffic impacts and roadway system improvement needs at both build-out of the project and for Phase 1 of the project. This traffic study also provides a measure of the overall project's mitigation responsibilities. The intent of the Traffic Mitigation Monitoring Program is not to re- define mitigation responsibility, but rather to assist in the refinement of area improvement needs and the timing of these improvements (Draft EIR, p.5-86). The Traffic Mitigation Monitoring Program proposes that a focused traffic study be prepared prior to occupancy of development included in each of the future development phases (e.g., 2, 3, and 4). The focused traffic study would: 1) document ambient traffic volumes conditions; 2) estimate trip generation for the particular development phase; and 3) assess traffic conditions with the traffic added by the particular development phase. The exact study area to be addressed in each of the focused traffic studies should be defined through discussions with the City Traffic Engineer. In general the study area should include the immediate access intersections and roadways, which would serve the new development phase and those critical off-site intersections and roadways that will provide access to the new development. Critical intersections / roadways are defined as those facilities that are experiencing high levels of peak period traffic congestion (at the time the focused traffic study is to be performed) and/or those roadways that are part of the General Plan arterial road network. City in proactively planning for area roadway improvements (Draft EIR, p.5-86). f. Prior to approval of the Final Map, the developer(s) shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the City's Department of Public Works that the project will allow for the facilitation of the City's ultimate Circulation Plan (Draft El R, p.5-86). Traffic Demand and Systems Manaqement Measures: In addition to the previously roadway and/or intersection improvements identified in Mitigation Measures a through f above, the following transportation system management / transportation demand management (TSM / TDM) measures are recommended to help reduce vehicular trips and traffic congestion: g. Prior to the approval of a tentative map or development plan, the developer will forward tract maps to the Riverside County Transit Agency (RTA) for review and comment regarding bus turnouts, shelters, etc. Transit-oriented facilities and design features will be incorporated into the design of the project as appropriate, to the satisfaction of the City and the RTA (Draft EIR, p.5-86). 17 R:~S P'~Harveston SP~City CouncilXRESO CC EIR Findings.doc h. Prior to the approval of a tentative map for individual planning areas or development plan, the developer and City staff will review plans, specially for multi- family housing areas, commercial uses, and parks for the provision of appropriate, necessary, and adequate pedestrian and bicycle facilities (Draft EIR, P.5-86, 87). i. During the development plan review, major employers (i.e., more than 250 employees) who locate their business within the project shall prepare Transportation Demand Management (TDM) plans in accordance with the Riverside County Council of Governments (RCTCANRCOG) guidelines (Draft EIR, p.5-87). 4. Supporting Explanation. In order to lessen the need for vehicle trips and to facilitate pedestrian and bicycle movement throughout the Project, the Specific Plan provides a system of bikeway and pedestrian pathways. These amenities will be provided along Margarita Road, Ynez Road, Santa Gertrudis Creek, Date Street and Loop Access Road (Draft EIR, p. 5-76). With the implementation of the project as proposed, including the Specific Plan Circulation Element and Mitigation Measures (including recommended roadway and intersection improvements), no significant traffic impacts will result from the proposed project under the Phase I - 2002 and Full Build-Out 2005 Scenarios (Draft EiR, p. 5-87). The main objective of the Circulation Plan is to provide direct and convenient access to individual residential enclaves, employment and service land uses through a safe and efficient network including arterial, secondary, collector, and local roadways, and a pedestrian trail/sidewalk system. The Loop Road, which will be the primary circulation route through Harveston, is envisioned as a landscaped parkway, with a right-of-way width of 66-feet. This accommodates a 44-foot road width, with wide parkway strips on either side (Draft EIR, p. 5-74 - 75). Roadways adjacent to the site will be improved to provide efficient access. Ail other residential roads, cul-de-sacs, and alley designs will be developed in conjunction with tentative tract maps for individual planning areas (Draft EIR, p. 5-74 - 75). C. Noise 1. Potential Significant Impacts. Construction activities, especially heavy equipment, will create short-term noise increases near the project site. With little development on the project site, initial heavy construction will not have significant noise impact potential. Such impacts may however, become important if construction occurs near already completed residential uses during later phases of project development (Draft EIR, p. 5-108). Upon completion, project-related traffic will cause an incremental increase in areawide noise levels throughout the Temecula area. Traffic noise impacts are generally analyzed both to insure that the project does not adversely impact the acoustic environment of the surrounding community, as well as to insure that the project site is not exposed to an unacceptable level of noise resulting from the ambient noise environment acting upon the project (Draft EIR, p. 5- 108). 2. Findings. The following Mitigation Measures will be implemented to reduce potential noise impacts to a less than significant level 18 RSS PkHarveston Sl~City CouncilLRESO CC EIR Findings.doc Short-term construction impact The following measures are required to reduce short-term construction noise impacts: a. As specified in City of Temecula Ordinance No. 94-25, no construction may occur within one-quarter (1/4) of a mile of any occupied residence during the following hours (Draft EIR, p. 5-119): 6:30 p.m. to 6:30 a.m., Monday through Friday. Before 7:00 a.m. or after 6:30 p.m., Saturday. At any time on Sunday or any nationally recognized holiday. b. All construction equipment shall use properly operating mufflers, and no combustion equipment such as pumps, generators or motors shall be allowed to operate within one quarter (1/4) mile of any occupied residence from 6:30 p.m. to 6:30 a.m. unless such equipment is surrounded by a noise protection earthen berm or solid barrier (Draft EIR, p. 5- 119). c. All construction staging shall be performed as far as possible from occupied dwellings (Draft EIR, p. 5-119). Long-term noise impact The following measures are required to achieve compliance with City standards for land use compatibility with respect to interior and exterior noise: d. A noise mitigation analysis shall be performed, at the final map stage (for individual planning areas), for all future project noise-sensitive uses potentially exposed to noise levels in excess of 60dB CNEL to verify that planned noise protection will meet City of Temecula standards (Draft EI R, p. 5-119, 120). Exterior recreational areas shall be protected to achieve noise levels of less than 65 dB CNEL. Interior living areas shall be protected to achieve noise levels of less than 4 dB CNEL. Substantial perimeter walls separating rear yards from the roadway right-of way along Date Street are anticipated to be necessary. Precise wall geometrics shall be determined once exact setbacks and building pad grades are established. Moderately upgrading window treatments shall be necessary along Date Street in upstairs bedrooms closest to the roadway. Minor acoustical upgrades shall be needed along Margarita or Ynez beyond simply closing windows to shut out roadway noise. The building code requires that supplemental fresh air ventilation be provided in rooms where window closure for traffic noise protection is necessary. A detailed noise attenuation evaluation shall be conducted in a supplemental acoustical study to be submitted when the tract map is filled with the appropriate agency. 19 R:\S PXHarveston SPXCity CouncilXRESO CC EIR Findings.doc 3. Supporting Explanation. The proposed Harveston project shall comply with the applicable codes and standards. Compliance with the City's standards shall assure regulations of nuisance noise during all phases of construction and operation of the project (Draft EIR, p. 5-119). Implementation of mitigation measure 4 and the rear yard perimeter protection for usable outdoor space (yard, patio, spa, etc.) for proposed homes along Date Street, Ynez Road, and Margarita Road will reduce the impacts to less than significant. In addition, implementation of mitigation measures 1-3 listed above, for temporary noise impacts emanating from construction activities, will reduce the short-term impacts to a level of less than significant (Draft EIR, p. 5- 120). D. Geology and Soils 1. Potential Significant Impact. The proposed project may introduce potential impacts related to seismic activity and other soils and geologic hazards (i.e., liquefaction, lateral spreading, earth-quake induced flooding, expansive soils, permanent cut slopes, surficial slopes instability, shrinkage and subsidence, and soil corrosivity) (Draft EIR, p. 2-18). Generally, geotechnical issues are site-specific and will be limited to within the development boundaries of the specific Plan site; therefore, no cumulative geotechnical impacts are anticipated (Draft EIR, p. 5-131). 2. Findings. The following Mitigation Measures will be implemented to reduce potential project geology and soils impacts to a less than significant level: a. During staff review of the tentative map for individual planning areas, an updated geotechnical/geologic report shall be prepared to include any necessary revisions to earthwork, foundation, design, and construction recommendations (Draft EIR, p. 5- 132). b. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the recommendations contained in section 6.0 of the geotechnical study, located in Appendix E of the Draft EIR shall be incorporated into the earthwork activities of the proposed project to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Earthwork activities include grading removals, subdrains, permanent slopes, temporary slope excavations, utility trench backfill, and site drainage. Additional recommendations are presented to mitigate the potential impacts related to liquefaction, expansive soil potential, and shrinkage and subsidence (Draft EIR, p. 5-132). c. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the recommendations contained in Section 7.0 of the geotechnical study, located in Appendix E of this document, shall be incorporated into the structural design of the proposed project to the satisfaction of the Chief Building Official. Structural design activities include: foundation design; retaining walls; slabs- on-grade; and appurtenant facilities (Draft EIR, p. 5-132). d. Prior to issuance of a building permit, it shall be proven to the Department of Building and Safety that al structures shall be designed in accordance with the seismic design provisions of the California Building Codes or Structural Engineering Association of California to promote safety in the event of an earthquake (Draft EIR, p. 5-132, 133). 3. Supporting Explanation. Application of the following standard conditions and uniform codes will reduce a number of potential impacts to a level of less than significant (Draft EIR, p. 5-131,132): 20 R:~ P~Harveston SP~City CouncilkRESO CC EIR Findings.doc · UBC, City Building Codes, and applicable seismic standards will reduce ground-shaking and related seismic effects to a level of less than significant. UBC, City Building Codes, and geotechnical report requirements will reduce impacts related to liquefication and seismically related soil conditions to a level of less than significant. City grading and Building Codes will reduce impacts related to disposal of excavated material, to a level of less than significant. · UBC or City grading and Building Codes will reduce impacts related to unstable cut and fill slopes to a level of less than significant. · Cai OSHA Construction Safety Orders and City grading and Building Codes will reduce impacts related to trench wall stability to a level of less than significant. · City grading and Building Codes will reduce impacts related to erosion of graded areas to a level of less than significant. · City grading and Building Codes will reduce impacts related to alteration of runoff, to a level of less than significant. · City grading and Building Codes will reduce impacts related to unprotected drainage ways to a level of less than significant. · City grading and Building Codes will reduce impacts related to increased impervious surfaces to a level of less than significant. With implementation of the mitigation measures listed above and compliance with standard federal, state, and local building codes, potential project impacts associated with seismic activity and other soil / geologic hazards will be reduced to levels less than significant (Draft EIR, p. 5- 133). E. Hydrology and Drainage 1. Potential Significant Impact. The proposed project has the potential to result in a long-term impact on water quality due to the addition of pollutants typical of urban runoff. Additionally, the proposed project has the potential to increase impervious surfaces, leading to increased runoff. The proposed project, in conjunction with other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects will result in a cumulative impact related to hydrology and drainage issues (i.e., water quality impacts, erosion, down stream siltation). The project's incremental contribution to this impact can be mitigated to a level less than significance. Water runoff will cumulatively increase due to the introduction of impervious surfaces. The proposed mitigation measure will reduce the project's incremental cumulative impact to a level less than significant (Draft EIR, p. 5-146). 2. Findings. The following Mitigation Measures will be implemented to reduce potential hydrology and drainage impact to a less than significant level: 21 R:\S PLqarveston SP\City CouncilLRESO CC EIR Findings.doc a. Prior to issuance of any grading permits for any areas larger than 5 acres in size, the developer shall submit a "Notice of Intent" (NOI), along with the required fee to the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board or the State Water Resoumes Control Board to be covered under the State national Pollutants Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction permit and provide the City with a copy of the written reply containing the developer's identification number (Draft EIR, p. 5-146). b. Prior to the issuance of the grading permits, the developer shall provide a Water Quality Management Plan showing conformance to all NPDES requirements (enacted by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Regional Water Quality Control Board, San Diego Region) for review and approval by the City Engineer. The plan shall reduce the discharge of pollutants to the maximum extent practical using best management practices, erosion control techniques and systems, design and engineering method and such other provision which are appropriate (Draft EIR, p. 5-147). Storm Water Quality Alternatives c. Catch Basin Filters: Storm water runoff may contain quantities of oil and grease from the use of vehicles. Catch basin filters could be installed on the on-site catch basins to absorb these contaminants before they get into the storm drain system. Catch basin filter is a filter which utilizes a natural absorbent material called Amorphos Alumina silicate (Fossil Rock) to filter out oil and grease and also maintain sufficient flow rate. Exact design of the filters may vary according to the characteristics of the proposed catch basins. A maintenance program would need to be developed, if possible to make this practice practical. Such a program typically includes periodic inspections, debris removal, local area cleanup, and replacement of filter absorbent material. An entity would need to be identified to carry out the maintenance program (Draft EIR, p. 5-147). d. Catch Basin Cleaninq: Cleaning of catch basin would be performed regularly to remove debris and reduce pollutant concentrations before first flush during storm seasons. Cleaning would also minimize clogging of the catch basin filter and underground drainage system. This catch basin cleaning practice should be at minimum provided once a year before the wet season to eliminate debris accumulated during the summer (Draft EIR, p. 5-147) e. Storm Drain System Siqnaqe: The Standard "No Dumping" signs would be posted at all the catch basin on-site (Draft EIR, p. 5-147) f. Household Hazardous Waste Collection and Education: Information regarding the City's or County's mobile collection program, or a stationary collection site if the City or County has one in the area, or businesses in the area certified to take in such waste could be given to new home buyers by the homebuilder at the time of new home purchase. If a homeowners association (HOA) is formed for this development, similar information could be disseminated on a regular basis (newsletters, billings, etc.) through this organization. The HOA and homebuilder could obtain information on programs from and coordinate with the City's Community Services Department (Draft EIR, p. 5-147). 3. Supporting Explanation. All construction activity will comply with NPDES requirements, as implemented and enforced by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, San Diego Region. Also, all commercial development will comply with NPDES requirements for stormwater runoff control, as implemented and enforced by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, San Diego Region. Prior to the issuance of occupancy 22 R:~S P~larveston SP\City Council~RESO CC EIR Findings.doc permits, the City will ensure that any required permanent facilities are in place. Compliance with these standard requirements will be mandated for the project (Draft EIR, p. 5-146). With implementation of proposed Mitigation Measure 1, the potential impacts to drainage will be reduced to a level less than significant (Draft fIR, p. 5-147). With implementation of proposed Mitigation Measure 1, the potential impacts associated with flooding will be reduced to a level less than significant (Draft fIR, p. 5-147). With implementation of proposed Mitigation Measures 2 and 3, the potential impacts to water quality will be reduced to level less than significant (Draft EIR, p. 5-147). Implementation of proposed Mitigation Measures 1 through 3 will reduce the project's contribution to potential cumulative drainage, flooding, and water quality impacts to a level less than significant (Draft EIR, p. 5-147). Incorporation into the Specific Plan of these mitigation measures will result in changes or alterations to the Specific Plan that will reduce hydrology and drainage impacts to a less than significant level. F. Biological Resoumes 1. Potential Significant Impacts. Impacts to Sensitive Species Although the proposed project occurs within the SKR Habitat Conservation Plan Area, this species is highly unlikely to occur onsite, and implementation of the SKR mitigation fees will reduce potential impacts to a level less than significant. Impacts to Jurisdictional Areas The proposed project will impact approximately 2.86 acres of '~Naters of the United States." No wetlands or riparian plant communities will be effected by the proposed project. The project has obtained a 404 permit from the Army COE and a 1603 Agreement from the CDFG. Mitigation for these impacts includes avoidance and habitat creating. With the implementation of the 404 and 1603 permit conditions, no significant impacts to Jurisdictional Waters are anticipated (Draft EIR, p. 5-156). 2. Findings. The following Mitigation Measures will be implemented to reduce potential biological resources impact to a less than significant level a. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the developer shall provide proof to the Department of Public Works and planning that the conditions of 404 and 1603 permits pertaining to the arroyo Park restoration have been bonded for and shall be implemented consistent with the timing requirements of the permits (Draft EIR, p. 5-157). b. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the developer shall pay applicable SKR mitigation fees in accordance with Chapter 8.24 (Habitat Construction) of the Temecula Municipal Code (Draft fIR, p. 5-157). 3. Supporting Explanation. Although no impact has been identified to SKR, implementation of the above standard condition will ensure that any potential impact to SKR regionally is mitigated to less than significant level. The proposed project will impact R:~S P~-[a~'~¢ston SP\C[t~ Council~,ESO CC fIR Findings.doc approximately 2.86 acres of "waters of the United States." No wetlands or riparian plant communities will be effected by the proposed project. Lennar Homes has obtained a 404 permit from the army COE and a 1603 Agreement from the CDFG. Mitigation for these impacts includes avoidance and habitat creation. Mitigation Measure I requires implementation of conditions of 404 and 1603 regarding restoration of the Arroyo Park, which will reduce impacts to levels of insignificance. The project, in conjunction with other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects, will incrementally contribute to the cumulative loss of biological resources. The project's incremental contribution to this impact will be mitigated to a less than significant level (Draft EIR, p. 5-157). G. Public Services and Utilities 1. Potential Significant Impact. The proposed project will create increased demand for public services and utilities on a local and regional basis (Draft EIR, p. 2-22). Fire According to the Temecula Fire Services and Riverside County Fire Department, future development of the project site will not create a need for expansion of facilities or addition of staff nor will it adversely impact the level of Service presently provided. Because the proposed project is located within City limits, the Fire Services Fees are included in the City's Development Impact Fees (DIF). With implementation of Mitigation Measures 1-4, potential impacts would be mitigated to less than significant levels (Draft EIR, p. 5-163). Police Development within the project area will adversely impact the level of police services presently provided. Calls for service will increase, requiring additional staff and office time to manage the project area. According to the City of Temecula Police Department, development of the project site will create the need for an additional storefront field office facility to support walk-in type "Calls for Service" (Draft EIR, p. 5-163). The proposed project would also create the need for additional staff. Presently, there is no revenue budgeted for such an expansion (Draft EIR, p. 5-163). Schools The development of 1,921 new residential units would generate 787 additional elementary school students, 337 middle school students, and 244 high school students. A new elementary school site would be needed since the school currently serving the area in no longer able to expand on the existing site. Additionally, expansions to Day Middle School and Chaparral High School would be required to house new students. Additional staff would also be required to serve the students (Draft EIR, p. 5-164). Parks and Recreation The proposed project would create additional demands on existing recreation facilities and service related programs. Implementation of the Harveston Specific Plan will create an additional demand for parks and recreation facilities. Additional staffing would be anticipated to fulfill these needs in concurrence with project development (Draft EIR, p. 5-164). 24 R:kS PkHarveston SP~City Council\RESO CC EIR Findings.doc Library The development of 1,921 new houses will generate additional patrons and will ultimately create a need for additional library staff, space, and additional resources. Additionally, the proposed project will create an increase in traffic though the library. The project will pay library fees, which are included in the City's DIR Fees to offset the project's effect on library facilities. The annual special tax paid by property owners helps offset library operations and maintenance. With implementation of Mitigation Measure 12, potential significant impacts would be mitigated to less than significant levels (Draft EIR, p. 5-165). Public Transportation The proposed project is anticipated to result in an increased demand for extended service to cover the project site. The project will create a need to expand coverage of the current TemeculaJMurrieta routes. Additional buses are also needed to meet demands for increased service. Bus turnouts and shelters to serve future residents shall be provided as required and established by the City Engineer, director of Planning, and the RTA (Draft EIR, p. 5-165). Water Implementation of the proposed project would result in development of land uses that may impact existing water services and facilities. Although the Rancho California Water District foresees no problems serving the proposed project, construction of Winchester Reservoir No. 2 by RCWD will occur on an as-needed basis as water demands increase in the 1380 Pressure zone (Draft EIR, p. 5-165). Sewer Implementation of the proposed project may result in additional demand on the existing sewer system from increased sewage flows, but will not adversely impact the level of service presently provided (Draft fIR, p. 5-166). Harveston Specific Plan area is located within the sewer service boundaries of Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD). According to the Eastern Municipal Water District, the existing facilities can accommodate this increased demand. Expansion of facilities and additional staff will be required over time (Draft fIR, p. 5-166). Storm Drainaqe / Flood Control The proposed project, in conjunction with other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects will result in a cumulative impact related to hydrology and drainage issues. The project's incremental contribution to this impact can be mitigated to a level less than significance. Water runoff will cumulatively increase due to the introduction of impervious surfaces. The proposed mitigation measure will reduce the project's incremental cumulative impact to a level less than significant (Draft EIR, p. 5-146). Natural Gas Southern California Gas Company (SCG) indicated that gas service could be provided in accordance with the Company's policies and extension rules on file with the California Public Utilities Commission at the time contractual arrangements are made. With implementation of Mitigation Measure 13, potential significant impacts would be mitigated to less than significant levels (Draft fIR, p. 5-171). 25 R:~S P~-Iarveston SP~City Council\RESO CC EIR Findings.doc Electricity Southern California Edison Company (SCE) does not anticipate any significant impacts in providing the project site with electrical power. SCE stands ready to install distribution facilities for the project site. With implementation of Mitigation Measure 14, potential significant impacts would be mitigated to less than significant levels (Draft EIR, p. 5-171). Solid Waste Project implementation will increase the amount of solid waste generated in the region, which in turn will increase the demand upon services of waste haulers in the project area. In addition, the construction phase of the development will also produce on-site solid waste (Draft EIR, p. 5- 171). There appears to be adequate landfill space for the present and immediate future, and the City participates in solid waste management activities through its SRRE. Based on this information, no significant solid waste utility impacts are expected with the implementation of Mitigation Measure 15 through 19. The project will be consistent with the goals of the General Plan related to utility systems after implementation of the proposed Mitigation Measures 15 through 19 (Draft EIR, p. 5-172). 2. Findings. The following Mitigation Measures will be implemented to reduce potential public services and utilities impact to a less than significant level: Fire a. Prior to the issuance of building permits, developer of individual projects shall pay the Development Impact Fee - Fire Protection Facilities Component per dwelling unit and per square foot of commercial spaces as adopted by the City of Temecula (Draft EIR, p. 5-176). b. Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer will demonstrate that all structures on-site shall be constructed with fire retardant roofing material as described in section 3202 of the California building Code. All roof materials shall be a class "B' rating and shall be approved by the Fire Department prior to installation (Draft EIR, p, 5-177). c. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the developer will demonstrate that all water mains and fire hydrants provide required for flows and shall be constructed in accordance with the appropriate sections of the Temecula Municipal Code Ordinance No. 99-14 and No. 99-23, subject to approval by Temecula Fire Service during design review (Draft EIR, p, 5-177). d. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the developer will demonstrate compliance with fire flow, street width, and design requirements as established by the City and County departments, as appropriate (Draft EIR, p, 5-177). Police e. Prior to the approval of development plans, the developer shall incorporate the following crime prevention measures within the detailed design plans for each tract map submitted to the City for review. The City of Temecula, Crime Prevention Officer shall review detailed plans for proposed residential and commercial uses in order to insure incorporation on these measures (Draft EIR, p, 5-177): 26 R:~S P'd-Iarveston S~City Council~RESO CC EIR Findings.doc · On-site street, walkways and bikeways shall be illuminated in order to enhance night time visibility; · Doors and windows shall be visible from the street and between buildings in order to discourage burglaries and potential suspect hiding places; · Fencing heights and materials utilized are intended to discourage climbing; · The numbering identification system utilized on-site shall be visible and readily apparent in order to aid emergency response agencies in quickly finding specific locations; and Walls along backbone streets will utilize graffiti resistant materials in their construction. In addition, shrubs, vines and espaliers shall be planted along the outside of these walls in order to provide coverage thereby further discouraging graffiti and climbing. Schools f. The project developer has entered into a Mitigation Agreement with the Temecula Valley Unified School District to insure the provision of adequate facilities at the time of project occupancy. The developer has been required to provide a school site and/or pay school fees pursuant to the agreement. (Draft EIR, p, 5-177). g. The conveyance of the elementary school site has occurred in accordance with District policies in effect at the time of development. The agreement regarding conveyance shall be provided to the City prior to the recordation of the tentative tract map for Phase 1 (Draft EIR, p. 5-177, 178). Parks and Recreation h. Prior to tentative map approval for individual planning areas, all recreational facilities shall be reviewed and approved by the Temecula Community Services Department (TCSD) and the Planning Department, to ensure that said facilities are in accordance with the City of Temecula standards (Draft EIR, p, 5-178). i. Prior to the approval of the final map for individual planning areas, the developer will dedicate land or contribute to the City's in lieu park fees in accordance with the City of Temecula Subdivision Ordinance (Draft EIR, p, 5-178). j. Prior to final map approval for individual planning areas, the developer will certify that ownership and maintenance of all open space/conservation areas will be the responsibility of a private entity and/or the Temecula Community Services Department, as determined by the Temecula Community Services Department (Draft EIR, p, 5-178). k. Prior to the issuance of building permits for Phase 2, specified in the Specific Plan, the 16.5-acre Community Park shall be completed per TCSD requirements and conveyed by grant deed to the City of Temecula (Draft EIR, p. 5-178). Library Prior to the issuance of building permits, developer of individual projects shall pay the Development Impact Fee - Libraries Component (Draft EIR, p, 5-178). 27 R:\S P~CIarveston SP\City CouncirtRESO CC EIR Findings.doc Public Transportation impacts are addressed in Section 5.3 of the Draft EIR. Please refer to Mitigation Measures 6 through 8 in Transportation / Circulation Section of this Mitigation Monitoring Program (Draft EIR, p, 5-178). Water Because implementation of the project as proposed, including the Specific Plan master utility plans, standard conditions, and uniform codes, is not expected to produce any significant impacts on water, no mitigation measures are necessary (Draft EIR, p, 5-178). Sewer Because implementation of the project as proposed, including the Specific Plan master utility plans, standard conditions, and uniform codes, is not expected to produce any significant impacts on sewer, no mitigation measures are necessary (Draft EIR, p. 5-179). Storm Drainage / Flood Control Please refer to Hydrology and Drainage Section of this Mitigation Monitoring Program for a discussion of impacts related to storm drainage (Draft EIR, p. 5-179). Natural Gas m. Prior to issuance of building permits, The Gas Company or designated natural gas provider shall be consulted with during the building design phase for further energy conservation measures (Draft EIR, p. 5-179). Electricity n. Prior to issuance of building permits, Southern California Edison (SCE) shall be consulted with during the building design phase for further energy conservation measures (Draft EIR, p. 5-179). Solid Waste o. Prior to the issuance of occupancy permits, the developers will inform all refuse generators within the project site, in writing, about opportunities for recycling and waste reduction (i.e., buy-back centers, curbside recycling, etc.). The use of such facilities will be encouraged by the developer, through information (e.g., materials accepted, location, etc.) provided in sales literature (Draft EIR, p. 5-179). p. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the developer will provide adequate areas for collecting and loading recyclable materials (recycling areas) in the commercial and multi-family residential areas. This will help the City comply with the California Solid Waste Reuse and Recycling Access Act of 1991 (AB 1327). The developer will also demonstrate compliance with established standards for design, siting, and operation of recycling areas and programs (Draft EIR, p. 5-179). 28 R:\S P~Harveston SP\City Council'tRESO CC EIR Findings.doc q. All residential units within the Harveston Specific Plan shall participate in the City's three (3) bin recycling system for the collection of solid waste, recyclable, and green waste materials (Draft EIR, p. 5-179). r. All multi-family, commercial, and industrial waters shall be processed at the material Recovery Facility in the City of Perris or similar recovery facility (Draft EIR, p. 5-179). s. Proof shall be provided to TCSD that, construction debris, including but not limited to lumber, asphalt, concrete, sand, paper, metal, etc. shall be recycled (Draft EIR, p. 5-179). 3. Supporting Explanation. All utility and public services improvements proposed as part of the Harveston Specific Plan/EIR will meet applicable City of Temecula, County of Riverside, and uniform codes (i.e., plumbing, fire, building) including potable water and sewer pipelines, electrical cables and writing, and natural gas lines. The proposed improvements will go through City's development review process and construction inspection program to ensure proper compliance with these standards and codes (Draft EIR, p. 5-176). The proposed project will create increased demand for public services and utilities on a local and regional basis. After mitigation, potential project impacts are reduced to a less than significant level. Additionally, the project, in conjunction with other past, present and reasonably foreseeable future projects, will create an increased demand on fire, police, schools, parks and recreation, library, public transportation, water, sewer, storm drainage/flood control, natural gas, electricity, and solid waste services and facilities. Implementation of mitigation measures will reduce each incremental cumulative impact on the associated public services and/or utilities to a level less than significant (Draft EIR, p. 5-180). P. Cultural Resources 1. Potential Significant Impact. Pursuant to Section 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines, the proposed project would not result in substantial adverse change in the significance of a historic or archaeological resource; however, it may directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature. According to the General Plan, the project site does not contain areas of sensitivity for archaeological resources, but it does contain areas considered to be high in sensitivity for paleontological resources. RMW Paleo Associates prepared a cultural resource study for the Specific Plan area, which consisted of a literature review and records search and a walkover survey (Initial Study, p. 7). 2. Findings. a. Inspection personnel will monitor onsite grading, including excavated soil stockpiles, especially in areas where Pauba or unnamed Sandstone formations are disturbed, for evidence of paleontological, archaeological, or historical artifacts (e.g., shells, fossils, bones, pottery, charcoal deposits, arrowheads, etc.). If any artifacts are discovered during grading, work will be halted and qualified personnel will be retained to examine, evaluate, and determine the most appropriate disposition of the resource(s) (Draft EIR, p. 8-21 ). 3. Supporting Explanation. According to the study, no archaeological sites were found on the project site. Although paleontological sites were not found on the site, according to the study, project implementation could expose fossils through grading and other 29 R:~S P~larveston SP\City Council",RESO CC EIR Findings.doc development activities. Implementation of the above mitigation measure ensures that exposure of cultural resources during grading/construction does not occur (Initial Study, p. 7). Section 4. The City Council hereby finds that, despite the incorporation of mitigation measures outlined in the Draft EIR, the following impacts cannot be fully mitigated to a less than significant level, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations is therefore included herein: A. Air Quality (Short-term Construction Related and Long-term) 1. Potential Significant Impact. The proposed project will have a short-term impact on air quality from construction activities. The grading of the project site, the construction of the buildings, and construction worker trips will create temporary emissions of dust, fumes, equipment exhaust, and other air contaminants throughout the project construction period. Pollutant emissions can vary substantially from day to day, depending on the level of activity, the specific operations, and the prevailing weather (Draft EIR, p. 5-97). Additionally, the proposed project will result in short-term air quality impact by daily exceeding the threshold for NOx. It will also add emissions to a non-attainment air basin causing significant impact, which cannot be mitigated (Draft EIR, p. 2-12). The proposed project will also result in long-term air quality impact by daily exceeding the threshold for CO, NOx, PM~0 and ROG. The proposed project will add emissions to a non- attainment air basin, causing significant impact (Draft EIR, p. 2-15). The proposed project in conjunction with other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects will result in significantly cumulative long-term impacts to air quality (Draft EIR, 2-16). 2. Findings. Implementing the following mitigation measures will reduce long-term air quality impacts to the extent feasible: a. Prior to grading and construction, the developer shall be responsible for compliance with the following (Draft EI R, p. 5-101): i. During clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation, maintain equipment engines in proper tune, ii. After clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation: 1) Wet the area down, sufficient enough to form a crust on the surface with repeated soakings, as necessary, to maintain the crust and prevent dust pick up be the wind. 2) Spread soil binders; and 3) Implement street sweeping as necessary. iii. During construction: 1) Use water trucks or sprinkler systems to keep all areas where vehicles move damp enough to prevent dust raised when leaving the site; 2) Wet down areas where vehicles move damp enough to prevent dust raised when leaving the site; 3) Use Iow sulfur fuel (.05% by weight) for construction equipment. iv. Discontinue construction during second stage smog alerts. 3O RSS l:~Harveston SP~City CouncilLRESO CC EIR Findings.doc b. Prior to grading and construction, the developer shall be responsible for compliance with the following (Draft EIR, p. 5-101,102): i. Require a phased schedule for construction activities to minimize daily emissions. ii. Schedule activities to minimize the amount of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. iii. Treat unattended construction areas with water (disturbed lands which have been, or are expected to be unused for four or more consecutive days). iv. possible on construction sites. at construction sites. Require the planting of vegetative ground cover as soon as Install vehicle wheel-washers before the roadway entrance Wash off truck leaving sites. Require all truck hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other loose substances and building materials to be covered, or to maintain a minimum freeboard of two feet between the top of the load and the top of the truck bed sides. viii. Use vegetative stabilization, whenever possible, to control soil erosion from storm water especially on super pads. ix. Require enclosures or chemical stabilization of open storage piles of sand, dirt, or other aggregate materials. x. Control off-road vehicle travel by posting driving speed limits on these roads, consistent with City standards. xi. Use electricity from power poles rather than temporary diesel or gasoline power generators. c. Prior to grading and construction, the developer shall be responsible for the paving of all access aprons to the project site and the maintenance of the paving (Draft EIR, p. 5-102). d. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the developer shall be responsible for assuring that construction vehicles be equipped with proper emission control equipment to substantially reduce emissions (Draft EIR, p. 5-102). e. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the developer shall be responsible for the incorporation of measures to reduce construction related traffic congestion into the project grading permit. Measures, subject to the approval and verification by the Public Works Department, shall include, as appropriate (Draft EIR, p. 5-102): i. Provision of rideshare incentives. 31 R:~S I~Harveston SP\City Council~RESO CC EIR Findings.doc ii. Provision of transit incentives for construction personnel. iii. Configuration of construction parking to minimize traffic interference. iv. Measures to minimize obstruction of through traffic lanes. v. Use of a flagman to guide traffic when deemed necessary. f. Prior to the building/construction operations, individual contractors will commit in writing to the following (Draft EIR, p. 5-102): i. Scheduling receipt of construction materials to non-peak travel periods (i.e., 7:30 - 8:30 AM and 4:00 - 6:00 PM); ii. Routing construction traffic through areas of least impact sensitivity; and iii. Limiting lane closures and detours to off-peak travel periods. g. Prior to the approval of tentative maps and/or development plans, developers will submit tract maps and/or street improvement plans to the RTA for review and comment regarding bus turnouts, shelter, etc. Transit-oriented facilities and design features will be incorporated into the design of the project as appropriate, to the satisfaction of the City. City staff will focus of the review plans for commercial uses to provide transit related features (Draft EIR, p. 5-102). h. Prior to the approval of a development plan, City staff will review plans, especially for commercial and park uses, for the provision of appropriate, necessary, and adequate pedestrian and bicycle facilities (Draft EIR, p. 5-103). i. Prior to the approval of a development plan, City staff will review plans for all service commercial uses to encourage the provision of park and ride facilities (Draft EIR, p. 5-103). j. Prior to the issuance of building permit, the developer shall provide proof to the City's Traffic Engineer that the project has contributed its fair-share towards regional traffic improvement systems (i.e., traffic impact fees) for the area. This shall include efforts to synchronize traffic lights on streets impacted by project development (Draft EIR, p. 5- 103). k. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the developer shall provide proof that energy saving features will be installed in project homes as required by the California Building Code. Features may include: solar or Iow-emission water heaters, solar roof tiles, energy efficient appliances, dual paned windows, Iow-pressure sodium parking lights, etc. Additionally, residential products constructed by the home building division of Lennar shall incorporate "Comfort Wise" energy-efficiency features (Draft EIR, p. 5-103). 32 R:\S P'fflarveston SP\City Council\RESO CC EIR Findings.doc 3. Supporting Explanation. The proposed project is anticipated to exceed SCAQMD's daily threshold emission levels for construction activities. Further, the addition of emissions to an air basin designated as non-attainment is considered under CEQA to be a significant impact. Mitigation Measure 1 though 6 are proposed to reduce this impact (Draft EIR, p. 5-103). The proposed project, in conjunction with other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future project, will result in a short-term air quality impact due to construction activities. The addition of emissions to an air basin designated as non-attainment is considered under CEQA to be a significant impact. The project's incremental contribution to this impact will be reduced by Mitigation Measures 1 through 6. The project's incremental impact, after mitigation, remain significant (Draft EIR, p. 5-103). The City of Temecula requires all projects within its jurisdiction to conform with SCAQMD Rule 403.2 and other applicable SCAQMD regulations regarding grading and construction. The SCAQMD Rule 403.2 includes standard conditions for construction activities to minimize the production of air pollutants including fugitive dust (Draft EI R, p. 5-101). The proposed project is anticipated to exceed SCAQMD's daily threshold emission levels for CO, NOx, PM10 and ROC. The daily exceedance of the thresholds for CO, NOx, PM10 and ROC is a long-term air quality impact. Further, the addition of emissions to an air basin designated as non-attainment is considered under CEQA to be a significant impact. Mitigation Measure g and k are proposed to reduce this impact. This impact even with proposed mitigation cannot be reduced to a level less than significant (Draft EIR, p. 5-103). The proposed project, in conjunction with other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects, will result in significant cumulative long-term impacts to air quality. The addition of emissions to an air basin designated as non-attainment is considered under CEQA to be a significant impact. Mitigation Measures g through k will reduce the proposed project's incremental contribution to this impact by reducing the proposed project's mobile and stationary source emissions. The project's incremental impact, after mitigation, remains significant (Draft EIR, p. 5-103). Under CEQA Guidelines Section 15093, a Statement of Overriding Considerations would need to be adopted for the air quality impacts, which remain significant after mitigation (Draft EIR, p. 5-103). B. Cumulative Impact on Air Quality 1 Potential Significant Impact. The proposed project, in conjunction with other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects, will result in a short-term air quality impact due to construction activities. The addition of emissions to an air basin designated as non-attainment is considered under CEQA to be an impact (Draft EIR, p. 5-100). The proposed project in conjunction with other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects will result in significant cumulative long-term impacts to air quality. The addition of emissions to an air basin designated as non-attainment is considered under CEQA to be an impact. The project's incremental impact cannot be reduced to a level less than significant (Draft EIR, p. 5-100). 2. Findings. The same mitigation measures identified in Section 4.1 above will help to slightly lessen the cumulative air quality impacts. Yet, no feasible mitigation measures exist which would reduce the cumulative impact of average daily pollutant emissions to a less than significant level. 33 R:~S PkHarveston SP\City Council'uRESO CC EIR Findings.doc 3. The City of Temecula requires all projects within its jurisdiction to conform with SCAQMD Rule 403.2 and other applicable SCAQMD regulations regarding grading and construction. The SCAQMD Rule 403.2 includes standard conditions for construction activities to minimize the production of air pollutants including fugitive dust (Draft EIR, p. 5-101). The proposed project is anticipated to exceed SCAQMD's daily threshold emission levels for CO, NOx, PM10 and ROC. The daily exceedance of the thresholds for CO, NOx, PM10 and ROC is a long-term air quality impact. (Draft EIR, p. 5-103). The proposed project, in conjunction with other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects, will result in significant cumulative long-term impacts to air quality. The addition of emissions to an air basin designated as non-attainment is considered under CEQA to be a significant impact. Mitigation Measures g through k will reduce the proposed project's incremental contribution to this impact by reducing the proposed project's mobile and stationary source emissions. The project's incremental impact, after mitigation, remains significant (Draft fIR, p. 5-103). Under CEQA Guidelines Section 15093, a Statement of Overriding Considerations would need to be adopted for the air quality impacts, which remain significant after mitigation (Draft EIR, p. 5-103). Section 5. Alternatives. The City Council hereby declares that it has considered the alternatives identified in the Draft EIR as described below. CEQA requires that an EIR evaluate a reasonable range of alternatives to a Project, or to the location of the Project, which: (1) offer substantial environmental advantages over the Project proposal, and (2) may be feasibly accomplished in a successful manner within a reasonable period of time considering the economic, environmental, social and technological factors involved. An EIR must only evaluate reasonable alternatives to a Project which could feasibly attain most of the Project objectives, and evaluate the comparative merits of the alternatives. In all cases, the consideration of alternatives is to be judged against a "rule of raason." The lead agency is not required to choose the "environmentally superior" alternative identified in an EIR if the alternative does not provide substantial advantages over the proposed Project and (1) through the imposition of mitigation measures the environmental effects of a Project can be reduced to an acceptable level, or (2) there are social, economic, technological or other considerations which make the alternative infeasible The City's General Plan identifies goals and policies that are relevant to the Specific Plan and the City as a whole, which are to provide for the orderly development of Temecula, in general, and also specifically for the Harveston site. A. Land Use Alternative 1. Description. The "Business Park Land Use" alternative proposes 30-acre of Business Park within southern portion of Planning Area 12 which under the proposed project is designated as Service Commercial. Please note that the proposed alternative described herein would be designated as "Business Park" in the City of Temecula General Plan and would be similar to the "Light Industrial" under the City of Temecula Development Code. The advantage of this alternative is to create a better transition between the Service Commercial within the Specific Plan area (remaining 82.4 acres of the proposed Service Commercial) and the existing adjacent Business Park/Light Industrial uses to the south. Additionally, while creating a more compatible use with the existing surrounding uses to the south, the addition of 34 R:~ PkI-Iarveston SP\City Council~RESO CC EIR Findings.doc this use diversity within the overall Specific Plan area. It introduces new uses within the Business Park designation which otherwise would not be permitted within the Harveston Specific Plan. Depending on the final location of the interchange, the Business Park alternative may constrain the ability to implement commercial uses south of Date Street. If the alternative Cherry Street alignment is selected, the exact business park area would be somewhat modified but would remain roughly the same size (Final EIR, p. 6-2). This alternative is to be consistent with the Rate and Method of Apportionment adopted as part of Community Facility District 98- 01. 2. Finding. The Planning Commission finds that the environmental impacts for this alternative would remain the same as the original proposed project, except for transportation/circulation impacts, which are reduced from the proposed project. The reduction of traffic under this alternative resulting in reduced transportation/circulation impacts would also be carried through to air quality and noise impacts (Draft EIR, p. 6-2). 3. Supporting Explanation. This alternative is feasible. While it meets the City's objectives, it does not meet the developer's objective to maximize future potential property values. This alternative does not require any additional land that would not be under the City or developer's ownership. This alternative reduces overall traffic by reducing total ADT by (6%). This reduction would also create less long-term air quality and noise impacts compared to the original proposed land use plan. It introduces better compatibility with the existing uses to the south and creates more diversity within the Specific Plan area. This alternative should remain under consideration (Draft EIR, p. 6-4). B. City-Wide Build-Out Circulation Alternatives 1. Description. As indicated in the April 1999, Notice of Preparation for this project and within Section 5.3 of this EIR, the City of Temecula's Circulation Element Update is currently in progress (Draft EIR, p. 6-5). The proposed Land Use Plan (Exhibit 4 in Section 3.0) identifies proposed land uses, as well as a proposed Circulation Plan that would accommodate the City's Citywide transportation needs. The Date Street Connection (as shown on Exhibit 4) is identified on the City's Existing Circulation Element. As identified within Section 5.3 of this EIR, under the City's Ultimate Build-Out Traffic Scenario, significant cumulative build-out impacts (i.e., LOS D or greater) occur along several roadways in the project vicinity (refer to Exhibit 44). The following circulation alternatives were analyzed in the EIR (Draft EIR, p. 6-5). Alternative 1 - Cherry Street Interchange Alternative The current Draft Proposed Circulation Plan that refers to a Cherry Street Connection (Over- crossing / Interchange Alternative) is consistent with the recently adopted Circulation Plan roadway configuration within the City of Murrieta. The objectives of this alternative Circulation Plan were: 1) to conform to the General Plans for the Cities of Temecula and Murrieta, 2) to maintain the Cherry Street Connection and any associated improvements wholly within the Temecula City Limits, and 3) maintain an alignment, which is consistent with City Traffic Engineer Design Standards. Alternative 2 - Date Street Over-Crossing Alternative This roadway configuration alternative proposes a Date Street over-crossing, which has been incorporated into the build-out model network component. A build-out traffic analysis was performed for this alternative (Draft EIR, p. 6-8). 35 R:~S P~l-larveston SimCity CouncilkRESO CC EIR Findings.doc Alternative 3 - Cherry Street Over-Crossing Alternative This roadway configuration alternative proposes a Cherry Street over-crossing, which has been incorporated into the build-out model network component. A build-out traffic analysis was performed for this alternative (Draft EIR, p. 6-8). 2. Finding. The City Council finds that because the three (3) above described circulation alternatives would essentially include the same quantity of development (i.e., 1,921 dwelling units and _+ 112 acres of Service Commercial). The majority of environmental issue impacts associated with the circulation alternatives would essentially be similar to the impacts identified in the EIR (i.e., biology, geology, etc). Aside from the differences in the long-term City-wide traffic impacts, the Cherry Street Connection Circulation Alternatives would result in a slightly larger Arroyo Park (+ 1.5 acres) and the Cherry Street Interchange alternative would require the acquisition of additional property not currently under the developer's or City's ownership. Both the Date and Cherry Over Crossing Only Alternatives would result in greater long-term Citywide circulation impacts (Draft EIR, p. 6-8). Therefore, the City Council hereby adopts the Cherry Street Interchange Alternative. 3. Supporting Explanation. The above discussed circulation alternatives are feasible. The Cherry Street Connection Alternatives would require land not currently under the City or developer ownership. The Draft Circulation Plan Alternative with a Cherry Street Interchange does reduce long-term Citywide circulation impacts over the existing adopted City's Circulation Element. It should be noted that the Draft Circulation Plan Alternative with a Date Street Interchange would result in similar Citywide circulation improvements beyond the City's existing Circulation Element. Both the Date and Cherry Over-crossing Alternatives would result in greater long-term Citywide circulation impacts (Draft EIR, p. 6-12). C. Community Park Design Alternatives 1. Description. The five (5) Community Park design alternatives were developed in response to suggestions / input from Temecula Community Services Department (TCSD) and the City of Temecula Planning Department, following their review of the original Conceptual Community Park Plan (Draft EIR, p. 6-14). Aside from the variation in the layout of park facilities (which do not change the impacts analysis results), the five (5) proposed park design alternatives incorporate the following modifications: 1) the realignment of Equity Drive, and 2) the utilization of the 1.25-acre out parcel in Alternatives 1 through 4. The rational for these modifications are: 1) the Equity Drive realignment provides for greater buffer / separation of the proposed park from the existing Winchester Highlands Business Park uses (i.e., Channel Commercial), and 2) the utilization of the 1.25-acre excluded parcel allows for a more balanced park parcel configuration, which result in a greater efficiency of park facility layout. The discussion below summarizes each design alternative. It should be noted that the key difference between these alternatives for CEQA analysis purposes is the Equity drive interface and how the excluded-pamel issue is addressed (Draft EIR, p. 6-14). Alternative I - Equity Drive Realiqnment and Use of Excluded Parcel This alternative includes all the TCSD required facilities. Although the ballfields meet the TCSD dimension criteria, there is some overlap in centerfield of the baseball / softball fields. This alternative requires approximately 12 light poles for the athletic fields. (Draft EIR, p. 6-14). 36 R:~S P~Harveston SP\City CouncilXRESO CC EIR Findings.doc Alternative 2 - Equity Drive Realignment and Use of Excluded Parcel This alternative is a slight variation of the alternative 1 layout with the parking lot off Equity Drive shifting below the picnic area. The snack facility was also moved in this alternative. This alternative includes all the required TCSD facilities; however, in an effort to reduce the ballfield overlap, the 2 softball fields were reduced to 260' from 300'. The 2 baseball fields still remain at 300'. Additionally, 4 basketball courts (not a TCSD required facility) were provided in this plan. This alternative requires approximately 11 light poles for the athletic fields (Draft EIR, p. 6-15). Alternative 3 - Equity Drive Reali.qnment and Use of Excluded Parcel This alternative is a further variation of the alternative 2 layout with the parking lot, picnic area, and snack facility remaining in the same location as alternative 2. However, the ballfields are laid out in a different manner with the diamonds side by side and the bleachers back to back. This configuration is the most efficient from a facility standpoint, and allows a direct path from the bleachers to the snack facility. This alternative includes all the TCSD required facilities; however, in an effort to reduce the ballfield overlap, the 2 softball fields were reduced to 260' from 300'. The 2 baseball fields still remain at 300'. Additionally, 4 basketball courts (not a TCSD required facility) were provided in this plan. This alternative requires approximately 11 light poles for the athletic fields (Draft EIR, p. 6-15). Alternative 4 - Equity Drive Realiqnment, But No Use of the Excluded Parcel This alternative is a partial variation of the alternative 1 layout with the parking lots, picnic area, and tot lot/play area occurring in a similar location to that of alternative 1. The layout of the fields is however, modified from alternative 1 to be more efficient. The baseball / softball diamonds and bleachers are all back to back with the snack facility centrally located between the four fields. This alternative includes all the TCSD required facilities; however, in an effort to reduce the ballfield overlap, the 2 softball fields were reduced to 260' from 300'. This alternative requires approximately 12 light poles for the athletic fields (Draft EI R, p. 6-15). Alternative 5 - Equity Drive Realiqnment, But No Use of the Excluded Parcel This alternative is a slight variation of alternative 3 with the exception that the parking lot at Equity Drive and a smaller picnic area is shifted to allow for the excluded parcel to remain. The basketball courts provided in alternative 3 are eliminated in this alternative. The ballfields area laid out in the same manner as alternative 3 with the diamonds side by side and the bleachers back to back. This configuration is the most efficient from a facility standpoint, and allows a direct path from the bleachers to the snack facility. This alternative requires approximately 11 poles from the athletic fields (Draft EIR, p. 6-15). 2. Finding. The Planning Commission finds that because all of the above described park alternatives are the same size (i.e., approximately 16.5 acres) and essentially occur in the same location as the original Community Park Plan, the environmental issue impacts associated with the park alternatives would essentially be similar to the impacts identified in the EIR. The following are the major differences and issues, which may affect the feasibility of the alternatives (Draft EIR, p. 6-20): · The alternatives would require acquisition of additional property not currently under the developer's or City's ownership (alternatives I through 5 would require land for the Equity Drive realignment, and alternatives 1 through 4 would require excluded parcel acquisition). 37 R:~S P~Harveston SP\City Council~.RESO CC EIR Findings.doc · The alternatives do provide a greater buffer between the Community Park and existing Channel Commercial. · The alternatives 1 through 4 do provide for a more efficient park parcel with a greater amount of useable area. 3. Supporting Explanation. These alternatives are typically feasible. They also meet the City and project developer objectives; however Alternatives 1-3 would require land not currently under City or developer ownership. Because Alternatives 1-3 require land not currently under City or developer ownership and could potentially impede the development of the Community Park, they are not the preferred alternatives and should be rejected from further consideration. All of these alternatives do not substantially reduce impacts associated with the original Plan, although they do provide for a greater buffer and more efficient park layouts. Alternatives 4 and 5 should remain under consideration (Draft EIR, p. 6-21 ). D. CEQA Alternatives 1. Descriptions> Alternative 1 - No Project / No Development An evaluation of a "No Project/No Development" alternative is required by CEQA Guidelines Section 15126(d)(2). Under this alternative, the proposed project would not be implemented and the site would remain in its current undeveloped state (Draft EIR, p. 6-21). 2. Finding. The Planning Commission find that the "No Development" Alternative fails to address many of the Goals identified in the City's General Plan. The No Project/No Development alternative would restrict development of the project site by not allowing the construction of the uses proposed as a result of the Specific Plan. Land uses within the project area would remain as they are currently and no development identified in the specific Plan would occur (Draft EIR, p.6-21). Based on the above rationale, it is determined that the proposed Harveston project would already be creating less impacts compared to the General Plan buildout assumptions. The City of Temecula has become more urbanized, potential sites appropriate for development of specific plan projects have become more scarce. Currently, the proposed Harveston project site is one the last remaining pieces of undeveloped land proposed for a specific plan (Draft EIR, p. 6-24). 3. Supporting Explanation. The assumption that no development at all would occur within the project boundary is an unlikely outcome based on existing zoning and the existing General Plan Land Use designations. This alternative does not meet the Project developer's objectives such as provision of residential, park/recreational and public/institutional (i.e., school) uses. Nor does it meet the City's objectives for the site such as (Draft EIR, p. 6- 23): 38 R:~S P~Harveston SP\City CounciruRESO CC EIR Findings.doc · Provide a variety of housing types and opportunities for all economic segments of the community; · Develop new residential housing, which is compatible with the character of existing individual neighborhoods and minimizes land use incompatibility; · Encourage the use of Specific Plans in the undeveloped areas of the community; and · Ensure that a full range of public facilities and services are provided to meet the needs of the community. · Provide a complete and integrated mix of residential, service commercial, recreation, public and open space land uses. · Provide a land use pattern and intensity of development that encourages alternative modes of transportation, including transit, bicycling, and walking. Ensure that right-of-way dedication is provided to meet the City's long-term circulation goals and needs as identified in the Circulation Element of the General Plan. It is, however, environmentally superior to the proposed project and remains under consideration (Draft EIR, p. 6-23). E. Other Alternatives Not Analyzed Alternative 2 - Development Under Existinq General Plan/Zoning The Harveston project proposes 1,921 dwelling units, which is below the general plan buildout of 39,658 dwelling units. Additionally, the proposed number of vehicle trips from the Specific Plan is lower compared to the buildout of the General Plan. The site has a SP zoning designation and has been analyzed as a Specific Plan area under the General Plan EIR. The currently proposed Specific Plan has made minor changes to existing General Plan land use configurations by shifting certain uses around. The following lists the major differences in the Harveston Specific Plan (Draft EIR, p. 6-24): Location of the community park has changed from a more internal location to be moved adjacent to the service commercial (across and adjacent to Ynez Road) to provide more Citywide visibility of the park. · The currently proposed specific plan includes more open space and recreation facilities than depicted on the General Plan land use map for the site. A riparian habitat is proposed, as an Arroyo Park to preserve and enhance the US waters and Fish and Game streambed. The Arroyo Park contains an area of 13.8 acres and is located across Date Street, within Planning Areas 10 and 11. 39 R:~S P~Harveston SP~City CouncilhRESO CC EIR Findings.doc Development under existing General Plan/Zoning would not be an environmentally superior alternative because the environmental impacts would be more significant than the proposed project. No further analysis is warranted (Draff EIR, p. 6-24). Alternative 3 - Alternative Location This alternative considers locating the proposed project at a different site. This alternative is required by CEQA and is intended to evaluate the option of the development of the proposed project at another site. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines, any alternative site evaluated herein must have similar characteristics as the project site including size, landform, and amenity opportunities. Development would include the same type of use, density, and intensity as the proposed project site (Draft EIR, p. 6-24). With regard to alternative locations for a Project, the CEQA Guidelines state that such analysis should be performed if "significant effects of the Project would be avoided or substantially lessened by putting the Project in another location" (Section 15126[d][5][B]). This EIR does not consider an alternative site for the following reasons: (a) Since the Project covers such a large area (549.5 acres), a similar site with existing infrastructure improvements, and one that is not already master planned for urban development, does not exist within the City of Temecula; and (b) Locating the same project at another site would not avoid or lessen the identified unavoidable significant (i.e., air quality) of the project; (c) the project proponent could not reasonably acquire an alternative site (Draft EIR, p. 6-24). Due to the fact that the City does not have a comparable area within its jurisdiction, the alternative location would not be a viable option. No further analysis is warranted (Draft EIR, p. 6-24). Section 6. Project Benefits and Statement of Overriding Considerations Pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines section 15093, the City Council must balance the benefits of the Specific Plan against any unavoidable environmental impacts in determining whether to recommend approval of the Harveston Specific Plan. If the benefits of the Specific Plan outweigh the unavoidable adverse environmental impacts, those impacts may be considered "acceptable." The City Council hereby finds that the Draff EIR has identified and discussed significant effects that will occur as a result of the Specific Plan. With the implementation of the mitigation measures discussed in the Draft EIR and Specific Plan, these effects can be mitigated to a less than significant level except for the unavoidable significant impacts as discussed in Section 4 of these Findings. The City Council declares that it has made a reasonable and good faith effort to eliminate or substantially mitigate the potential impacts resulting from the Specific Plan. The City Council finds that to the extent any mitigation measures recommended in the Draft EIR and/or Specific Plan could not be incorporated, such mitigation measures are infeasible because they would impose restrictions on the Specific Plan that would prohibit the realization of specific economic, social, and other benefits that this Planning Commission finds outweigh the unmitigated. The City Council declares that, having reduced the adverse significant environmental effects of the Specific Plan to the extent feasible by recommending adopting of the proposed mitigation 4O R:~S PkHarveston SP~City Council'xRESO CC EIR Findings.doc measures, having considered the entire administrative record on the Specific Plan, and having weighed the benefits of the Specific Plan against its unavoidable adverse impacts after mitigation, the Planning Commission has determined that the following social, economic, and environmental benefits of the Specific Plan outweigh the potential unavoidable adverse impacts and render those potential adverse environmental impacts acceptable based upon the following overriding considerations: The Specific Plan will allow the orderly, well planned development of the Harveston site, providing a range of housing types complementary to existing development in the City (Specific Plan, p. 3-1 & -5). The Specific Plan introduces a "unified project design" with standards and requirements for architectural forward residential development (Specific Plan, p. 10-68). The Specific Plan will provide for the development of a Village Center concept that centralizes activities, consistent with General Plan policy (Specific Plan, p. 3- 1). The Specific Plan will provide over 75 acres of active and passive recreational park space (i.e., the lake as a central theme) (Specific Plan, p. 3-1, -6 & -7). The park recreation and open space provided by the Specific Plan is in excess of twice the open space uses provided for in the existing General Plan. The Specific Plan will integrate into the community an open space network comprised of parks, paseos, and connecting pedestrian/bicycle routes (Specific Plan, p. 3-6). The Specific Plan will include a 16.5-acre Community Park with four lighted 300' baseball/softball field with 2 full size soccer field overlays; 100 parking spaces within the park off Equity Drive; 25 parking spaces within the park off the Loop Road; large snack bar/restroom facility (1,800 square feet); small restroom adjacent to tot lot and picnic areas; and ball field and park lighting to be approved by the City. The Specific Plan will provide for the development of neighborhood and community commercial centers to provide needed services and reduce the number of cars traveling across the City for these services (Specific Plan, p. 3-5 & -6). The Specific Plan will provide housing to meet anticipated population growth throughout the Temecula Valley (Specific Plan, p. 3-1 & -5). The Specific Plan has provided for a new elementary school site prior to the construction of the first dwelling unit (Specific Plan, p. 3-6). 10. The Specific Plan will provide for the improvement of currently inadequate regional flood control facilities to provide 100-year storm protection (Specific Plan, p. 5-1). 11. The Specific Plan has provided in accordance with CFD 98-01 roadway improvements consistent with the General Plan Circulation Element and Specific 4! R:~S P~Harveston SP\City Councir,,RESO CC EIR Findings.doc Plan 3-7. 12. The Specific Plan accomplishes and implements the Temecula General Plan goals and policies (Specific Plan, p. 2-2 & 3-9). 13. During the life of the project, the Harveston Specific Plan will pay approximately 27 million in special tax pursuant to CFD 98-01 to finance the design and construction of public improvements currently serving the City in areas adjacent to the Harveston Specific Plan. 14. The proposed General Plan Land Use Designations allocated a total of 53.7 acres of open space compared to the existing General Plan Land Use Designations which allocated 25.4 acres of open space. The proposed general plan land use designations exceed the existing general plan land use designation of open space by 28.3 acres. The City Council finds that the foregoing benefits provided to the public through approval and implementation of the Specific Plan outweigh the identified significant adverse environmental impacts of the Specific Plan which cannot be mitigated. The Planning Commission further finds that each of the Specific Plan benefits outweighs the unavoidable adverse environmental effects identified in the Draft EIR and therefore finds those impacts to be acceptable. Each of the benefits listed above, standing alone, is sufficient justification for the Planning Commission to override these unavoidable environmental impacts. The City Council finds that it has reviewed and considered the Final EIR in evaluating the Specific Plan, that the Final EIR is an accurate and objective statement that fully complies with the CEQA, State CEQA Guidelines and the City's local CEQA Guidelines and that the Final EIR reflects the independent judgment of the Council. The City Council hereby certifies the Environmental Impact Report based on the following findings and conclusions: A. Findings. The following significant environmental impacts have been identified in the Draft EIR and will require mitigation as set forth in Section 4 of this Resolution but cannot be mitigated to a level of insignificance: long-term and short-term project and cumulative air quality impacts. B. Conclusions 1. All significant environmental impacts from implementation of the Specific Plan have been identified in the Draft EIR and, with implementation of the mitigation measures identified, will be mitigated to a level of insignificance, except for those impacts listed in Section 6.1 above. 2. Other reasonable alternatives to the Specific Plan, which could feasibly achieve the basic objectives of the Specific Plan, have been considered and rejected in favor of the Specific Plan. 3. Environmental, economic, social and other considerations and benefits derived from the development of the Specific Plan override and make infeasible any alternatives to the Specific Plan or further mitigation measures beyond those incorporated into the Specific Plan. 42 R:~S P'xI-Iarveston SP~City Council~°.ESO CC EIR Findings.doc Section 7. Selection of Project Alternatives The City Council hereby adopts Circulation Alternative 1 - Cherry Street Intemhange and directs that the final Harveston Specific Plan be modified to reflect this selected alternative. Section 8. Adoption of Recommendation for the Adoption of a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program The City Council hereby adopts the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program in Section 8.0 of the Final EIR and attached to this Resolution as Exhibit A. Exhibit A is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full. In the event of any inconsistencies between the mitigation measures as set forth herein and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program shall control. Section 9. Location of Records The documents and materials that constitute the record of proceedings on which these Findings have been based are located at the City of Temecula, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California 92590. The custodian for these records is the City of Temecula Planning Director. This information is provided in compliance with Public Resources Code section 21081.6. Section 10. Effective Date The Resolution shall become effective upon its adoption. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 24th day of July 2001. Jeff Comerchero, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) 43 R:\S P\Harveston SP\City CouncilXP, ESO CC EIR Findings.doc I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 2001- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 24th day of July, 2001, by the following vote: AYES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS None NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk 44 R:\S P\Harveston SP\City Council\RESO CC EIR Findings.doc EXHIBIT A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM 45 R:~S P'd-larveston SP\City Council'uO, ESO CC EIR Findings.doc Z 0 Z 0 Z © © Z 0 Z 0 Z 0 Z 0 [.. Z © Z 0 Z 0 Z © z ~ . 0 .~ 0 .. Z 0 © 0 z 0 Z 0 .< Z 0 Z 0 Z © Z 0 Z © 0 ATFACHMENT NO 2 DRAFT RESOLUTION APPROVING THE GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT AND THE SPECIFIC PLAN R:\S P~Harveston SPxCity CounciI~STAFFRPT 7-24-01.doc 12 Attachment No. 2 RESOLUTION NO. 01~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 99-0419 (GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT) FOR THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN AND THE 'TWO EXCLUDED PARCELS WITHIN THE SPECIFIC PLAN AND ADOPTING SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 13 (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 99-0418) ON PARCELS TOTALING 550 ACRES LOCATED EAST OF INTERSTATE 15, NORTH OF SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK, WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD AND SOUTH OF THE NORTHERN CITY LIMIT, AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR PARCEL N OS. 910-261-001,910-261-002, 910-110-013,910- 110-015, 910-110-020, 910-110-021,910-110-027, 910-110-076, 910-100- 007, 910-100-008, 910-060-009, 910-120-005, 910-120-007, 910-120-008, 911-630-001,911-630-002, 911-630-003, 911-640-001,911-640-002, 911 - 180-002, 911-180-003, 911-180-004, 911-180-008, 911-180-009, 911-180- 015, 911-180-023, AND 911-180-028 WHEREAS, Lennar Communities filed Planning Application Nos. PA00-0419 and PA99- 0418 (the "Application"), in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan, Development Code, CEQA Guidelines and California State CEQA Guidelines; WHEREAS, the Application was processed including, but not limited to public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered the Application on June 20, 2001 and July 12, 2001, at duly noticed public hearings as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support or opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearings and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission recommended approval of the Application subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder; WHEREAS, the City Council considered the Application on July 24, 2001, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support or opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Council hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Council approved of the Application, and certified the Environmental Impact Report, made all required findings and determinations relative thereto and adopted the Mitigation Monitoring Program after finding that the project proposed in the Application conformed to the City of Temecula General Plan as amended; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by reference. R:\S PXHarveston SPeCify CouncilkRESO CC GPA SP.doc Section 2. Findings. That the City Council, in approving the Application, hereby makes the following findings: A. The project as proposed and conditioned is compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community. The project has been reviewed and determined to be in conformance with the City's General Plan. These documents set policies and standards that protect the health, safety and welfare of the community. Access and circulation are adequate for emergency vehicles. The two excluded parcels not under the applicant's ownership that are located within the Specific Plan shall hereby be re-designated to become compatible with the surrounding land uses of the Harveston Specific Plan. The City hereby finds it necessary to change the Land Use Designation of the two excluded pamels to ensure the public health, safety and welfare of the City and to facilitate future development of these two parcels by removing the requirement for a separate Specific Plan. B. The project is compatible with surrounding land uses. The project proposes similar residential neighborhoods adjacent to existing surrounding neighborhoods, with interface buffers and full roadway improvements. The limited neighborhood commercial development is proposed within a Village Center and is designed to be pedestrian oriented to serve the needs of the Harveston community. The Service Commercial is west of Ynez Road, adjacent to Interstate 15 where similar commercial and retail uses currently exist along the Interstate corridor. C. The proposed project will not have an adverse effect on the community because it remains consistent with the goals and policies of the adopted General Plan. The project does not represent a significant change to the planned land uses for the site. The General Plan Amendment is a relocation and reallocation of existing land use designations that conforms to the design of the specific plan. Section 3. Findings. That the City Council, in approving the Application, hereby makes the following findings as required in Chapter 17.16 of the Temecula Municipal Code: A. The proposed specific plan is consistent with the General Plan, as it is proposed to be amended, and compatible with the Development Code. The findings of General Plan consistency are attached as Exhibit D and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. The proposed Specific Plan is consistent with the goals and policies of the general plan. The Specific Plan is a reallocation and redistribution of the majority of the existing Land Use Designations and serves as an implementation tool for the General Plan. Therefore, as proposed, the Specific Plan is consistent with the general plan, as it is proposed to be amended, and development code. B. The proposed Specific Plan would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the city. The proposed Specific Plan has been reviewed and determined to be in conformance with the City's General Plan (as it is proposed to be amended), and Growth Management Action Plan. These documents set policies and standards that protect the health, safety and welfare of the community. In addition, the Specific Plan is a master planned community with specific design guidelines and standards that ensure compatibility and interface with the surrounding community in terms of density, design and circulation. Therefore, as proposed, conditioned and designed, the Specific Plan is compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community. C. The subject property is physically suitable for the requested land use designations and the anticipated land use developments. There are no physical constraints of the site which would preclude or prohibit the requested land use designations or anticipated developments. Moreover, the proposed Specific Plan land uses are consistent with the land uses of the General Plan and will serves as the tool to regulate and implement the goals and policies of the General Plan. The applicant has submitted applications for Tentative Tract Maps which indicate that the site is physically suitable for the land uses and development proposed in the Specific Plan. R:~S PXHarveston SP~City Council~RESO CC GPA SP.doc 2 D. The proposed project shall ensure development of desirable character which will be compatible with existing and proposed development in the surrounding neighborhood. The project proposes similar residential land uses adjacent to the existing surrounding neighborhoods, with extensive landscape buffers and interfaces. The limited neighborhood commercial development is proposed within a Village Center and is designed to be pedestrian oriented to serve the needs of the Harveston community. The proposed Service Commercial land uses west of Ynez Road, adjacent to Interstate 15 where similar commemial and retail uses currently exist along the Interstate corridor. The Specific Plan took under consideration the existing developments and surrounding zoning classifications to ensure development that will be complementary and compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. Section 4. Environmental Compliance. The City Council of the City of Temecula has certified the Final Environmental Impact Report, made all required findings and determinations relative thereto and adopted the Mitigation Monitoring Program after finding that the project proposed in the Application conformed to the City of Temecula General Plan, as amended, for the Harveston Specific Plan in order to approve the Application. Section 5. General Plan Amendment. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby approves the Application changing the General Plan Land Use Designations on 550 acres on property located east of Interstate 15, north of Santa Gertrudis Creek, west of Margarita Road and south of the northern City, and known as Assessor Parcel Nos. 910-261-001,910-261-002, 910- 110-013, 910-110-015, 910-110-020, 910-110-021,910-110-027, 910-110-076, 910-100-007, 910- 100-008, 910-060-009, 910-120-003, 910-120-007, 910-120-008, 911-630-001,911-630-002, 911 - 630-003, 911-640-001,911-640-002, 911-180-002, 911-180-003, 911-180-004, 911-180-008, 911 - 180-009, 911-180-015, 911-180-023, and 911-180-028, to reflect the land uses contained in the approved Harveston Specific Plan, as contained in Exhibit A. Exhibit A is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full. Section $. Specific Plan. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby approves mixed use specific plan known as the Harveston Specific Plan (SP No. 13), on property located east of Interstate 15, north of Santa Gertrudis Creek, west of Margarita Road and south of the northern City, and known as Assessor Parcel Nos. 910-281-001,910-261-002,910-110-013, 910-110-015, 910- 110-020, 910-110-021,910-110-027, 910-110-076, 910-100-007, 910-100-008, 910-080-009,, 910- 120-008, 911-630-001,911-830-002, 911-630-003, 911-640-001,911-640-002, 911-180-002, 911- 180-003, 911-180-004, 911-180-008, 911-180-009, 911-180-015, 911-180-023, and 911-180-028 as contained in Exhibit B, the Harveston Specific Plan (SP13) and subject to that Conditions of Approval included in Exhibit C. Exhibit B is on file in the Official Records of the City Clerk and is expressly incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full. Exhibit C is attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. R:~S P~Ha~veston SPXCity Council',RESO CC GPA SP.doc 3 Section 7. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 24th day of July 2001. Jeff Comerchero, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC/AAE City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTYOF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 2001 - was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 24th day of ,~uly, 2001, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC/AAE City Clerk R:~S P~-larveston SIACity CounciI~RESO CC GPA SP.doc 4 EXHIBIT A GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP R:\S P~Harveston SP~Cii7 Council~RESO CC GPA SP,doc 5 /? EXHIBIT B SPECIFIC PLAN 13 (On file in the Official Records of the City Clerk) RSS P~Harveston SPxCity CounciBRESO CC GPA SP.doc 6 (The Harveston Specific Plan has been previously provided under separate cover.) R:\S PxHarveston SPeCify CounciI~RESO CC GPA SP.doc 7 EXHIBIT C CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR SPECIFIC PLAN 13 R:\S P%larveston SPXCity Council\RESO CC GPA SP.doc 8 EXHIBIT C CiTY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No. PA99-0418 (Specific Plan) - Harveston Specific Plan No. 13 Project Description: A Specific Plan consisting of approximately 550 acres that proposes 1,921 residential units with a variety of residential product types and lot sizes; a 12 acre elementary school site; a 7 acre lake with a 6.9 acre lake park; a 16.5 acre community park; a 13.8 acre arroyo open space park; a Mixed-Use Overlay zone (Village Green) which may be as large as 13 acres; and 112.5 acres of Service Commercial land adjacent to Interstate 15. Assessor's Parcel Nos. 910-261-001, 910-261-002, 910-110-013, 910-110-015, 910-110- 020, 910-110-021, 910-110-027, 910-110-076, 910-100-007, 910- 100-008, 910-060-009, 910-120-008, 911-630-001, 911-630-002, 911-630-003, 911-640-001, 911-640-002, 911-180-002, 911-180- 003, 911-180-004, 911-180-008, 911-180-009, 911-180-015, 911 - 180-023 AND 911-180-028. Approval Date: July 24, 2001 PLANNING DIVISION Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project The applicant shall deliver to the Community Development Department - Planning Division a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Nine Hundred Twenty-Eight Dollars ($928.00) which includes the Eight Hundred and Fifty Dollar ($850.00) fee, required by Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(d)(3) plus the Seventy-Eight Dollars ($78.00) County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination for the Environmental Impact Report required under Public Resources Code Section 21151 and California Code of Regulations Section 15904. if within said forty-eight (48) hour period the Applicant has not delivered to the Community Development Department - Planning Division the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)). General Requirements The permittee/applicant shall indemnify, defend with counsel of City's own election, and hold harmless, the City and any agency or instrumentality thereof, and/or any of its officers, employees, and agents from any and all claims, actions, or proceedings against the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, er any of its officers, employees, and agents, to attack, set aside, void, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting from an approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application which action is brought within the appropriate statute of limitations period and Public Resources Code, Division 13, Chapter 4 (Section 21000 et seq., including but not by the way of limitations Section 21152 and 21167). The City shall promptly notify the permittee/applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding brought forth within this time period. R:\S P~-Iarveston SP~PC Docs\COA-SP.doc The City shall estimate the cost of the defense of the action and applicant shall deposit said amount with the City. City may require additional deposits to cover anticipated costs. City shall refund, without interest, any unused portions of the deposit once the litigation is finally concluded. Should the City fail to either promptly notify or cooperate fully, permittee/applicant shall not, thereafter be responsible to indemnify, defend, protect, or hold harmless the City, any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its officers, employees, or agents. All development within this site shall be in accordance with the requirements of all City ordinances, except as expressly modified herein or by development agreement, and State laws, and shall conform with the approved Specific Plan. Regulations or procedures not covered by the Specific Plan or appur[enant documents shall be subject to the City ordinances in effect at the time entitlement is required. Approval of this Specific Plan is contingent upon and shall not become effective nor shall it vest until a General Plan Amendment (GPA) and Zone Change are approved by the City Council, and an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) or any other environmental review under the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) are certified by the City Council. Nothing in this approval, as memorialized in this Resolution, shall require or be interpreted to require the City of Temecula to fund or cause to be funded the development of any facilities or improvements, including but not limited to infrastructure improvements, which are necessary or convenient to cause, allow or further the development of the subject Specific Plan, except as may be expressly agreed to by the City of Temecula." Notwithstanding any of the conditions contained herein, the Developer and the City may enter into a development agreement, pursuant to Government Code Section 65864 through 65869.5 or other agreement(s) requiring the Developer to: 1) advance the funding or construction of public improvements; 2) redefine the scope of any public improvement; 3) acquire or fund the acquisition of land for public purposes; and 4) waive any right to reimbursement for facilities or the dedication of land. Further, notwithstanding any of the conditions contained herein, Developer may seek an agreement for reimbursement for any improvements or facilities that qualify for reimbursement at such time as the City of Temecula adopts an ordinance for such reimbursement pursuant to and consistent with California Government Code Sections 66485 through 66489, inclusive, and further shall waive the same in the event of agreements, consistent with the foregoing, that require or include any or all of the terms set forth immediately above. Once the Project Study Report (PSR) conducted by Caltrans is completed, the road alignments affecting the individual planning areas (i.e. Ynez Road and Cherry/Date Street) may be altered or modified to implement the PSR. The alternation or modification of the roads will not require a Specific Plan Amendment; however, all applicable text, sections, figures and exhibits in the Specific Plan shall be modified to reflect the actual roadway alignments as determined in the PSR subject to the approval of the Director of Planning and Public Works Director. Within thirty (30) days of approval of the Specific Plan, the applicant shall submit a final copy reflecting all the changes necessary to make the document consistent with City Council's final action. The final Specific Plan shall be reviewed for consistency and approved by the Planning Director. The applicant shall comply with all applicable mitigation measures contained in the adopted City of Temecula General Plan and the Harveston Environmental Impact Report. R:\S P\Harveston SP~F'C Docs\COA-SP.doc 2 10. A detailed noise mitigation analysis shall be performed, at the final map stage (for individual planning areas) for all future project noise-sensitive uses potentially exposed to noise levels in excess of 60 dB CNEL to verify that planned noise protection will meet City of Temecula standards. A. Exterior recreational areas shall be protected to achieve noise levels of less than 65 dB CNEL. B. Interior living areas shall be protected to achieve noise levels of less than 45 dB CNEL. Substantial perimeter walls separating rear yards from the roadway right-of-way along Date Street area are anticipated to be necessary. Precise wall geometrics shall be determined once exact setbacks and building pad grades are established. Moderately upgrading window treatments shall be necessary along Date Street in upstairs bedrooms closest to the roadway. Minor acoustical upgrades shall be needed along Margarita or Ynez beyond simply closing windows to shut out roadway noise. The building code requires that supplemental fresh air ventilation be provided in rooms where window closure for traffic noise protection is necessary. A detailed noise attenuation evaluation shall be conducted in a supplemental acoustical study to be submitted when the tract map is filed with the appropriate agency. 11. During staff review of any tentative map, an updated geotechnical/geologic report shall be prepared to include any necessary revisions to earthwork, foundation, design, and construction recommendations. 12. On residential streets that generate less than 250 vehicular trips, the road (curb to curb) shall be thirty-six feet (36') with a parkway separating the sidewalk from the curb. 13. Du ring the development plan review, major employer (more than 250 employees) who locate their businesses within the project shall prepare Transportation Demand Management (TDM) plans in accordance with the Riverside County Transportation Commission/Western Riverside Council of Governments (RCCTCNVRCOG) guidelines. 14. Prior to the approval of a development plan or tentative map for individual planning areas, the developer and City staff will review plans, especially for multi-family housing areas, commercial uses, and parks for the provision of appropriate, necessary, and adequate pedestrian and bicycle facilities. 15. Prior to the approval of a development plan, City staff will review plans, especially for commercial and park uses, for the provision of appropriate, necessary and adequate pedestrian and bicycle facilities. 16. Prior to the approval of a development plan, City staff will review plans, for all service commercial uses and shall encourage the provision of park and ride facilities. 17. Prior to approval of any development projects, appropriate clearances, conditions and approvals from all agencies with jurisdiction on project review shall be obtained by the developer. These agencies shall be determined by the Director of Planning and the City Engineer. 18. The developer or the developer's successor-in-interest shall be responsible for maintaining the undeveloped portion of the site including weed abatement and litter removal. R:\S P\Harveston SP\PC Docs\COA-SP.doc 3 19. Prior to approval of any development projects, the developer shall investigate the feasibility of a reclaimed water system, to irrigate landscaping within the roadway medians, parkways, drainage channel, schools, the community park, the paseo park, neighborhood parks, and other common open space areas. The developer shall provide evidence that compliance with this condition is in accordance with Senate Bill 2095. 20. The Master Developer shall provide the prospective home buyers a notice that the 16.5-acre community park will include sports field lighting for evening use. Proof of this notification shall be provided to the Planning Department and included in the Master Covenants, Codes and Restrictions (CC&R's) prior to the recordation of the first Final Map. 21. All lighting shall be reviewed by the City to assure compliance with the Ordinance No. 655. 22. The lake park, but not the surface of the lake, shall be open to the public. 23. The approval granted by this Resolution shall become effective upon the Effective Date of the Development Agreement, as the term Effective Date is defined in the Development Agreement adopted concurrently with this Resolution. In addition to the foregoing, in the event a Development Agreement is entered into that supercedes or alters these conditions of approval and the applicant causes a default or terminates by conduct the Development Agreement, then the City shall immediately consider the revocation of the approval granted by this Resolution. Prior to the Issuance of Grading Permits 24. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that ordinance or by providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid. 25. The developer shall provide a Water Quality Management Plan showing conformance to all NPDES requirements (enacted by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Regional Water Quality Control Board, San Diego Region) for review and approval by the City Engineer. 26. The developer shall provide proof to the Department of Public Works and Planning that the conditions the 404 and 1603 permits pertaining to the Arroyo Park restoration have been bonded for and shall be implemented consistent with the timing requirements of the permits. 27. The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be provided by the Community Development Department - Planning Division staff, and return one signed set to the Planning Department for their flies. Prior to the Issuance of Building Permits 28. The developer shall provide proof to the City's Traffic Engineer that the project has contributed its fair-share towards regional traffic improvement systems (i.e., traffic impact lees) for the area through a Development Agreement or other agreement. This shall include efforts to synchronize traffic lights on streets impacted by project development. 29. Prior to the approval of a development plan or tentative map, staff shall forward the proposed application to the Riverside County Transit Agency (RTA) for review and comment regarding bus turnouts, shelters, etc. Transit-oriented facilities and design features will be incorporated into the design of the project as appropriate, to the satisfaction of the City and RTA. R:\S P~Harveston SP\PC Docs\COA-SP.doc 30. The developer shall provide proof that energy saving features will be installed in project homes as required by the California Building Code. Features may include: solar or Iow- emission water heaters, solar roof tiles, energy efficient appliances, dual parted windows, Iow pressure sodium parking lights, etc. Additionally, residential products constructed bythe home building division of Lennar shall incorporate "Comfort Wise" energy-efficiency features. 31. Landscaping design and water conservation devices that conform to the California Model Water Conservation Ordinance shall be required, such as Iow flow toilets, faucets and showerheads, shade tree selection and placement. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Unless otherwise noted, all conditions shall be completed by the Developer at no cost to any Government Agency. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the tentative site plan all existing and proposed easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage courses, and their omission will subject the project to further review and may require revision. GENERAL CONDITIONS 32. All utility systems such as electric, including those which provide direct service to the project site and/or currently exist along public rights-of-ways adjacent to the site (except electrical lines rated 33 ky or greater), gas, telephone, water, sewer, and cable TV shall be placed underground, with easements provided as required, and designed and constructed in accordance with City Codes and the utility provider. 33. Prior to the issuance of any grading permit, as deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall consult with the State of California Department of Fish and Game, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to determine if permits or approvals are necessary from such agencies for any action contemplated by this proposal. Such consultation shall be in writing, and copies of said correspondence, including responses from agencies, shall be submitted to the City. Where appropriate, the terms, conditions, and recommendations of the noted agencies shall be incorporated as Conditions of Approval into the areas of development. 34. All easements and/or right-of-way dedications shall be offered for dedication to the public or other appropriate agency and shall continue in force until the City accepts or abandons such offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the Department of Public Works. 35. Landscaping and permanent irrigation facilities shall be installed with all street improvements on and off-site grading. Perimeter walls, where required, shall be treated with graffiti- resistant coating and shall be installed adjacent to street improvements within each phase. 36. A phasing plan addressing the schedule of necessary infrastructure requirements shall be approved by the Department of Public Works and the Planning Director prior to approval of any subsequent application. 37. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06, unless otherwise provided for by a written agreement between the City and the Developer. 38. The Developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required real property interests necessary to carry out these conditions, and if he or she should fail to do so, the Developer R:\S P\Harveston SP\PC Docs\COA-SP.doc 5 shall, prior to submittal of the Final Map for recordation, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act, Section 66462 and Section 66462.5. Such agreement shall provide for payment by the Developer of all costs incurred by the City to acquire the real property interests required in connection with the subdivision. Security of a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the Developer, at the Developer's cost. The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal. CIRCULATION 39. Prior to Final Map recordation, the Developer is responsible to bond for or construct the traffic signals at the project's accesses, as required, including the associated street improvements, based on traffic signal warrants analysis relative to subsequent tentative maps and/or development applications. 40. Adequate primary and secondary access shall be provided for each phase of development as approved by the Department of Public Works. Access to office and commercial areas shall be reviewed by the Department of Public Works at the time of submittal of individual tentative maps and/or development applications. Additional rights-of-way at entries to the aforementioned sites may be required to provide for turning lanes as directed by the Department of Public Works. 41. The exact location and number of access points shall be subject to review and approval by the Department of Public Works upon future tentative map and/or development plan approvals. 42. All street sections shall correspond with Typical Roadway Cross Sections and requirements of the Circulation Element of City's General Plan, City ordinances and standards or as approved with the Harveston Specific Plan. 43. All intersection intervals shall comply with City standards and requirements. 44. The Developer shall provide bus bays and shelters within the Specific Plan. Location and number of bus bays shall be subject to approval of the City and Riverside Transportation Agency (RTA). Additional rights-of-way dedications associated with bus bays shall be provided by the Developer. 45. Necessary improvements have been/will be conditioned based on the project traffic studies and the conceptual phasing plan shown on Section 12 of the Specific Plan. Any substantive rephasing of the development must be approved by the Planning and Public Works Director through a rephasing application. Prior to the issuance of occupancy permits within any phase, all on and offsite improvements as referred to in the Traffic Reports and subsequent addenda along with additional requirements set herein, or as set by conditions on individual tracts, must be constructed and/or bonded as required by the Department of Public Works. 46. Ensuing Traffic Reports, analyzing traffic impacts associated with subsequent development stages of the Specific Plan, shall be submitted to identify implementation and timing of the necessary improvements to mitigate cumulative traffic impacts. TRAFFIC MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM 47. The Traffic Mitigation Monitoring Program proposes that a traffic study be approved prior to the issuance of first occupancy permit in each additional phases of the development. The R:\S P\Harveston SP\PC Docs\COA-SP.doc 6 intent of the Traffic Mitigation Monitoring Program is not to re-define mitigation responsibility, but rather to assist in the refinement of area improvement needs and the timing of the improvements. The traffic study would: 1 ) document ambient traffic volumes conditions; 2) estimate trip generation for the particular development phase; and 3) assess traffic conditions with the traffic added by the particular development phase. The exact study area to be addressed in each of the traffic studies should be defined through discussions with the City Traffic Engineer. In general the study area should include the immediate access intersections and roadways, which would serve the new development phase and those critical off-site intersections and roadways that will provide primary access to the new development. Critical intersections / roadways are defined as those facilities that are experiencing high levels of peak period traffic congestion (at the time the traffic study is to be pedormed). The traffic study findings would assist the City in proactively planning for area roadway improvements. DRAINAGE 48. Drainage and flood control facilities shall be provided in accordance with the requirements of the City and/or Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (RCFC&WCD). 49. Prior to approval of any subsequent development applications, the Developer shall submit the master drainage plan to the City and RCFC&WCD to review the adequacy of the proposed and existing downstream drainage facilities. 50. Drainage facilities within each phase shall be constructed immediately after the completion of the site grading and prior to or concurrently with the initial site development within that phase. 51. All drainage facilities shall be designed to convey 100-year storm flows, subject to the approval of the Department of Public Works and RCFC&WCD, as applicable. 52. The Developer shall construct the proposed on and offsite drainage facility improvements and the interim detention basin provision as recommended in the Specific Plan and Drainage Study documents and/or as directed by the Department of Public Works and RCFC&WCD, as applicable. 53. As required by the Department of Public Works, additional Hydrology and Hydraulic Reports shall be submitted with subsequent tentative maps and/or development applications to study the drainage impacts and analyze necessary measures to mitigate the runoff created as part of the development of this project. 54. The Developer shall accept and properly dispose of all off-site drainage flowing onto or through the site. 55. The Developer shall protect downstream properties from damages caused by alteration of the drainage patterns; i.e., concentration or diversion of flow. Protection shall be provided by constructing adequate drainage facilities, including enlarging existing facilities or by securing drainage easements. WATER AND SEWER 56. Water and sewer facilities shall be installed in accordance with the requirements and specifications of the City, Rancho California Water District (RCWD), and Eastern Municipal R:\S P~Harveston SP\PC Docs\COA-SP.doc 7 57. 58. Water District (EMWD). Such requirements shall be applied at the subdivision or plot plan stages of the development. Prior to the approval of subsequent development applications, the Developer shall submit the master water plan to RCWD to check for adequacy of the proposed water facilities. The Developer shall obtain written approval for the water system from RCWD. Prior to the approval of subsequent development applications, the Developer shall submit the master sewer plan to EMWD to check for adequacy of the proposed sewer facilities. The Developer shall obtain written approval for the sewer system from EMWD. GRADING 59. No grading shall be permitted for any development area prior to tentative map or plot plan approval and issuance of grading permits for the specific area of development. 60. Grading plans and operations shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standards, the recommendations contained in the Geotechnical Report, or any subsequent reports prepared for the project, the conditions of the grading permit, and accepted grading construction practices and the recommendations and standards specified in the Specific Plan and Environmental Impact Report (EIR) document. 61. Prior to issuance of any grading permit, erosion control plans shall be prepared in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works. The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and erosion control improvements. 62. The Developer shall comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit regulated bythe State Water Resources Control Board, and the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) implemented by the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board. 63. Each subsequent application for a phase of development shall include a conceptual grading plan to indicate at a minimum: a) Preliminary quantity estimates for grading. b) Techniques and methods which will be used to prevent erosion and sedimentation during and after the grading process in compliance with the City Standards and NPDES requirements. c) Preliminary pad and roadway elevations. d) Designation of the borrow or stockpile site location for import/export material. e) Approximate time frames for development including the identification of areas which will be graded during the rainy months. f) Hydrology and hydraulic concerns and mitigations. 64. Major grading activities shall be scheduled during the dry season wherever possible, or as otherwise approved by the Department of Public Works. 65. Soils stabilization, which may include revegetation of graded areas, shall occur within 30 days of completion of grading activities as directed by the Department of Public Works. 66. The site shall be watered during grading operations to control dust. R:\S P\Harveston SP\PC Docs\COA-SP.doc 8 67. Temporary drainage and sediment control devices shall be installed as directed by the Depadment of Public Works. 68. An import/export route shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works prior to issuance of any grading permit. The plan shall include limitation to the duration of the grading operation and construction activities, a Traffic Control Plan, and a daily time schedule of operations. 69. Prior to issuance of any grading permit, a soils repods shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval, to address engineering, geologic, seismic, and soils engineering concerns for each tentative map or commercial parcel map for each phase of proposed development. 70. A Geotechnical Report shall be prepared by a registered engineer or engineering geologist and submitted to the Department of public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address special study zones and identify any geotechnical hazards for the site including location of faults and potential for liquefaction. The report shall include recommendations to mitigate the impact of ground shaking and liquefaction. 71. All public streets shall be maintained and cleaned if necessary on a daily basis during grading operation and construction activities. Cash deposit, letter of credit or posting of bond to guarantee maintenance of all public rights-of-way affected by the grading operations and construction activities, shall be posted prior to issuance of grading permits. 72. If subsequent Geotechnical and Soils Reports determine that dewatedng of the site is necessary during construction, necessary permits (ie. in compliance with NPDES permit) shall be obtained from appropriate agencies prior to approval of the grading plans. PHASING 73. Construction of the development permitted by the Specific Plan, including recordation of final subdivision maps, may be carried out in stages provided that, adequate vehicular access is constructed for all dwelling units in each stage of development and further provided that such development conforms substantially with the intent and purpose of the Specific Plan Phasing Plan. 74. Development applications shall be submitted for each planning unit in each phase. Total acreage and land uses within each phase shall be substantially in accordance with the specifications of the Specific Plan. 75. The Developer shall be permitted to seek a reimbursement agreement for qualifying facilities and improvements, as the same are authorized in Condition 6 of the Resolution. The City and the Developer shall proceed in good faith to allocate appropriate reimbursements to the Developer pursuant to the City's then enforceable ordinance applicable to such reimbursement. 76. PHASE 1 a. CIRCULATION The following improvements shall be completed as part of Phase 1 and prior to 1st building permit in Phase 2. i. Improve Date Street from Margarita Road to the Major Entry at Date Street (Urban Arterial Highway Standards - 134' R/W) to include dedication of half- R:\S P\Harveston SP\PC Docs\COA-SP.do¢ 9 iv. width street right-of-way, installation of half-width street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer), and a 14 foot wide raised landscaped median ii. Improve the Major Entry at Date Street from Date Street to Loop Road (Modified Major Highway Standards - 100' R/W) to include dedication of full- width right-of-way, installation of full-width street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer) and a 14 foot wide raised landscaped median iii. Improve the Loop Road from Major Entry at Date Street to School Site Modified Collector Road Standards - 66' R/W) to include dedication of full- width right-of-way, installation of full-width street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer) iv. Improve northbound Margarita Road from Santa Gertrudis Creek to the southerly boundary of Tract Map No. 21340 (Arterial Highway Standards - 110' R/W) to include installation of half-width street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer), and a 14 foot wide raised landscaped median. CIRCULATION The following improvements shall be completed prior to the first occupancy permit in Phase I i. Improve the Loop Road from the Major Entry at Margarita Road to the westerly boundary of Planning Area 5 ( Modified Collector Road Standards - 66' R/W) to include dedication of full-width right-of-way, installation of full- width street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer) 1. Provide an Eastbound Free Right Turn Lane from the Loop Road onto the Major Entry at Margarita Road ii. Improve Southbound Margarita Road from Santa Gertrudis Creek to Date Street (Arterial Highway Standards - 110' R/VV) to include dedication of half- width street right-of-way, installation of half-width street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer), and a 14 foot wide raised landscaped median. iii. Improve the Major Entry at Margarita Road from Margarita Road to Loop Road (Modified Street Section per the Specific Plan - 106' RNV) to include dedication of full-width right-of-way, installation of full-width street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer), and a 20 foot wide raised landscaped median Improve the Minor Entry at Margarita Road from Margarita Road to Loop Road (Modified Street Section per the Specific Plan - 82' R/W) to include dedication of full-width right-of-way, installation of full-width street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and R:\S P\Harveston SP\PC Docs\COA-SP.doc 10 sewer) v. Improve the Village Center Road from the Loop Road to the Major Entry at Margarita Road (Modified Street Section per the Specific Plan - 63' R/W) to include dedication of full-width right-of-way, installation of full-width street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer) The following improvements shall be completed prior to the first occupancy permit in Phase 1 of the Service Commercial area vi. Improve Ynez Road from the southerly Specific Plan boundary to Equity Drive (Arterial Highway Standards - 110' R/W) to include dedication of half- width street right-of-way, installation of half-width street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer), and a 14 foot wide raised landscaped median. vii. On or before January 1,2003 the Developer shall reserve for the City's use or commitment to use the same for freeway interchange and/or freeway- related traffic circulation purposes, a component of real property that is: (i) approximately twenty (20) contiguous acres in area; (ii) identified and defined by the City Engineer of City of Temecula; (iii) reserved for a twenty (20) year period for the purpose of offering a permanent dedication for freeway related purposes to the City of Temecula if and when the City represents to Developer that a freeway interchange is to be constructed on the burdened property. Any portion of the Reserved real properly shall be released from the reservation at the time the City determines such real property is not necessary for the freeway improvements. "Reservation" shall mean the Owner an/or Developer of the subject real properly shall not improve the real property but shall instead maintain the property in a non-nuisance condition and in an undeveloped/unimproved state during the term of the Reservation. The Owner or Developer shall submit an enforceable written instrument so burdening the subject real property for the review and approval of the City Attorney and Director of Public Works prior to, and have the same approved, in such time so as to allow the Reservation to be enforceable on or before January 1, 2003. OFFSITE CIRCULATION Prior to issuance of 326th occupancy permit for the Phase 1 Residentia~ and more than 8 acres of Phase 1 Service Commercial development (southern portion of Planning Area 12), the developer(s) shall implement the improvements for the following: i. Improve the intersection of Winchester Road at Ynez Road 1. Add Eastbound Through Lane 2. Add Southbound Right Turn Overlap Phase 3. Modify Signal to Provide Northbound Right Turn Overlap Phase R:\S P\Harveston SP\PC Docs\COA-SP.doc 11 ii. Improve the intersection of Winchester Road at Margarita Road 1. Add Right Turn Lane and Modify Signal to Provide Southbound Right Turn Overlap Phase 2. Add Eastbound Left Turn Lane (Dual Left) TRAFFIC SIGNALS i. Prior to the first occupancy permit or as warranted, the developer shall install a traffic signal with conduits for future interconnect at the following intersections: 1. Margarita Road and Major Entry at Margarita Road 2. Major Entry at Margarita Road and Loop Road 3. Margarita Road and Date Street 4. Date Street and Major Entry at Date Street 5. Modify the existing traffic signal at the intersection of Margarita Road and Rustic Glen Drive DRAINAGE i. Construct backbone channel and/or drainage facilities and all associated improvements per Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District and the City of Temecula WATER AND SEWER i. Install water mains per Rancho California Water District requirements and sewer mains per Eastern Municipal Water District requirements 77, PHASE 2 a. CIRCULATION The following improvements shall be completed as part of Phase 2 and prior to first building permit in Phase 3. i. Improve Date Street from the Major Entry at Date Street to the westerly boundary of Planning Area 3 (Urban Arterial Highway Standards - 134' R/W) to include dedication of half-width street right-of-way, installation of half-width street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer), and a 14 foot wide raised landscaped median. ii. Improve the Loop Road from Major Entry at Date Street to the westerly boundary of Planning Area 5 (Modified Collector Road Standards - 66' R/W) to include dedication of full-width right-of-way, installation of full-width street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer). iii. Improve Ynez Road from Equity Drive to Service Commercial Access Ill (Arterial Highway Standards - 110' R/VV) to include dedication of full-width right-of-way, installation of full-width street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities R:\S P~Harveston SP~F'C Docs\COA-SP.doc iv, (including but not limited to water and sewer) and a 14 foot wide raised landscaped median. On or before January 1,2003 the Developer shall reserve for the City's use or commitment to use the same for freeway interchange and/or freeway- related traffic circulation purposes, a component of real property that is: a) approximately twenty (20) contiguous acres in area; b) identified and defined by the City Engineer of City of Temecula; c) reserved for a twenty (20) year period for the purpose of offering a permanent dedication for freeway related purposes to the City of Temecula if and when the City represents to Developer that a freeway interchange is to be constructed on the burdened property. Any portion of the Reserved real property shall be released from the reservation at the time the City determines such real property is not necessary for the freeway improvements. "Reservation" shall mean the Owner an/or Developer of the subject real property shall not improve the real property but shall instead maintain the property in a non-nuisance condition and in an undeveloped/unimproved state during the term of the Reservation. The Owner or Developer shall submit an enforceable written instrument so burdening the subject real property for the review and approval of the City Attorney and Director of Public Works prior to, and have the same approved, in such time so as to allow the Reservation to be enforceable on or before January 1,2003. Improve Equity Drive from County Center Drive to the new Ynez Road (Modified Principal Collector Road Standards - 78' RNV) to include to include dedication of full-width right-of-way, installation of full-width street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer) OFFSITE CIRCULATION Prior to the issuance of occupancy permits for the Phase II build-out of Residential (defined as issued building permits in excess of 476 for single family detached units and 346 for attached multiple family units) and Service Commercial (defined as development that involves real property that in the aggregate exceeds twenty (20) net acres of real property within Planning area 12) apd Village Center neighborhood commercial (beyond an aggregate of eight thousand (8000) square feet of developed area) the improvements generally described hereafter shall have been completed to the reasonable satisfaction of the City and the Developer shall be authorized to seek a reimbursement agreement as provided for in condition 6, unless waived pursuant to condition 6. 1. 2. 3. R:\S P\Harveston SP\PC Docs\CQA-SP.doc Winchester Road at Jefferson Avenue Add Eastbound Right Turn Lane Add a Southbound Left Turn Lane (Dual Left) Convert Southbound Right Turn Lane to Shared Through and Right Turn Lane 13 4. Add Northbound Right Turn Lane (Dual Right) ii. Winchester Road at 1-15 Southbound Ramp 1. Add Eastbound Right Turn Lane 2. Add Southbound dedicated Left Turn Lane (Dual Left) and widen off ramp to accommodate the added lane iii. Winchester Road at Ynez Road 1. Add Eastbound Left Turn Lane (Dual Left) 2. Add Eastbound Through Lane 3. Add Northbound Left Turn Lane (Triple Left) 4. Modify Signal to provide Northbound Right Turn Overlap Phase 5. Split Northbound and Southbound Signal Phases 6. Add Westbound Through Lane 7. Add Southbound Shared Through and Right Turn Lane (300' Minimum) iv. Overland Drive at Jefferson Avenue 1. Modify Signal to Provide Westbound Right Turn Overlap Phase 2. Modify Signal to Provide Northbound Right Turn Overlap Phase 3. Split Northbound and Southbound Signal Phases 4. Add Eastbound Right Turn Lane v. Overland Drive at Ynez Road 1. Add Westbound Right Turn Lane 2. Modify Westbound Shared Through and Right Turn Lane to Through Lane 3. Modify Signal to Provide Westbound Right Turn Overlap Phase 4. Modify Signal to Provide Southbound Right Turn Overlap Phase vi. Overland Drive at Margarita Road 1. Modify Northbound Through Lane to Shared Through and Left Turn Lane 2. Split Northbound and Southbound Signal Phases vii. Winchester Road at 1-15 Northbound Ramp 1. Add Westbound right turn lane (Dual right) CITY OF MURRIETA CIRCULATION A fair-share contribution shall be made to the City of Murrieta prior to the first occupancy permit in Phase 2 to improve the intersection of: i. Murrieta Het Springs Road at Jefferson Avenue 1. Add Westbound Left Turn Lane (Dual Left) 2. Channelize Northbound Right Turn Lane to Allow Free Right Turn Movement R:\S P~larveston SP\PC Docs\COA-SP.doc 14 ii. Murrieta Hot Springs Road at Alta Murrieta Drive 1. Add Westbound Right Turn Lane 2. Modify Westbound Shared Through and Right Turn Lane to Right Turn Only Lane iii. Murrieta Hot Springs Road at Margarita Road 1. Modify Eastbound Through Lane to Shared Through Lane/Right Turn Lane 2. Modify Northbound Through Lane to Shared Through Lane/Left Turn Lane TRAFFIC SIGNALS i. Prior to the first occupancy permit, or as warranted, the developer shall install a traffic signal with conduits for future interconnect at the following intersections: 1. Date Street and Major Entry at Date Street DRAINAGE i. Construct backbone channel and/or drainage facilities and all associated improvements per Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District and the City of Temecula requirements, 78. f. WATER AND SEWER i. Install water mains per Rancho California Water District requirements and sewer mains per Eastern Municipal Water District requirements. PHASE 3 a. CIRCULATION The following improvements shall be completed as part of Phase 3 and prior to the first building permit in Phase 4: i. Improve Date Street from the westerly boundary of Planning Area 3 to Ynez Road (Urban Arterial Highway Standards - 134' R/VV) to include dedication of full-width street right-of-way, installation of full-width street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer), and a 14 foot wide raised landscaped median 1. Provide Eastbound Right Turn Lane onto Ynez Road per EIR ID. No. 32 2. Provide Westbound Right Turn Lane onto Ynez Road per EIR ID. No. 32 ii. Improve Ynez Road from Service Commercial Access III to Date Street (Arterial Highway Standards - 110' FINV) to include dedication of full-width right-of-way, installation of full-width street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer) and a 14 foot wide raised landscaped median 1. Provide Southbound Right Turn Lane onto Date Street per EIR ID. No. 37 R:\S P\Harveston SP\PC Docs\COA-SP.doc 15 iii. 2. Provide Northbound Right Turn Lane onto Date Street per EIR ID. No. On or before January 1,2003 the Developer shall reserve for the City's use or commitment to use the same for freeway interchange and/or freeway- related traffic circulation purposes, a component of real property that is: a) approximately twenty (20) contiguous acres in area; d) identified and defined by the City Engineer of City of Temecula; 79. c) reserved for a twenty (20) year period for the purpose of offering a permanent dedication for freeway related purposes to the City of Temecula if and when the City represents to Developer that a freeway interchange is to be constructed on the burdened property. Any portion of the Reserved real property shall be released from the reservation at the time the City determines such real property is not necessary for the freeway improvements. "Reservation" shall mean the Owner an/or Developer of the subject real property shall not improve the real property but shall instead maintain the property in a non-nuisance condition and in an undeveloped/unimproved state during the term of the Reservation. The Owner or Developer shall submit an enforceable written instrument so burdening the subject real property for the review and approval of the City Attorney and Director of Public Works prior to, and have the same approved, in such time so as to allow the Reservation to be enforceable on or before January 1,2003. DRAINAGE i. Construct backbone channel and/or drainage facilities and all associated improvements per Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District and the City of Temecula requirements. WATER AND SEWER i. Install water mains per Rancho California Water District requirements and sewer mains per Eastern Municipal Water District requirements. PHASE 4 a. CIRCULATION The following improvements shall be completed as part of Phase 4. i. Improve Date Street from Ynez Road to Interstate 15 (Urban Arterial Highway Standards - 134' R/VV) to include dedication of full-width right-of- way, installation of full-width street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer) and a 14 foot wide raised landscaped median ii. Improve Ynez Road from Date Street to the northerly Specific Boundary (Arterial Highway Standards- 110' R/VV) to include dedication of full-width right-of-way, installation of full-width street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer) and a 14 foot wide raised landscaped median iii. All necessary right-of-way in Planning Areas 8 and 12, including slope areas R:\S P\Harveston SP\PC Docs\COA-SP.doc 16 for the Date/Cherry Intemhange shall be granted free and clear of encumbrances in fee title. The location and limits of the right-of-way shall be as approved by the City and the California Department of Transportation. DRAINAGE i. Construct backbone channel and/or drainage facilities and all associated improvements per Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District and the City of Temecula c. WATER AND SEWER i. Install water mains per Rancho California Water District requirements and sewer mains per Eastern Municipal Water District requirements FIRE DEPARTMENT The following are the Fire Department Conditions of Approval for this Specific Plan. All questions regarding the meaning of these conditions shall be referred to the Fire Prevention Bureau. 80. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in force at the time of building plan submittal. 81. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for residential land division per CFC Appendix III.A, Table A-III-A-1. The developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 1500 GPM at 20-PSI residual operating pressure with a 2-hour duration. The required fire flow may be adjusted during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire Flow as given above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC 903.2, Appendix Ill-A) 82. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC Appendix III.B, Table A-III-B-1. Standard fire hydrants (6" x 4" x 2 1/2" outlets) shall be located on Fire Department access roads and adjacent public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 500 feet apart, at each intersection and shall be located no more than 250 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required. (CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix III-B 83. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for commercial land division per CFC Appendix Ill-A, Table A-III-A-1. The developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 4000 G PM at 20-PSI residual operating pressure with a 4 hour duration. The required fire flow may be adjusted during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire Flow as given above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC 903.2, Appendix Ill-A) 84. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC Appendix Ill-B, Table A-III-B-1. Super fire hydrants (6" x 4" x 2-2 1/2" outlets) shall be located on Fire Department access roads and adjacent public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 350 feet apart, at each intersection and shall be located no more than 210 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required. (CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix Ill-B) R:\S P~larveston SP\PC Docs\COA-SP.doc 17 85. Maximum cul-de-sac length shall not exceed 1320 feet. Minimum turning radius on any cul- de-sac shall be thirty-seven (37) feet for residential and forty-five (45) feet for commercial. (CFC 902.2.2.3, CFC 902.2.2.4) 88. If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection prior to any building construction. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2) 87. Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent roads are installed. Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface for 80,000 lbs. GVW. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2) 88. Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved Fire Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or any portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface designed for 80,000 lbs. GVW with a minimum AC thickness of .25 feet. (CFC sec 902) 89. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have a clear paved section of thirty-six (36) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13) feet six (6) inches. (CFC 902.2.2.1). 90. Private roads and alleys may be as narrow as 20 feet unobstructed travel width, not including parking with Fire Prevention approval on a map by map basis. 91. Cul-de-sacs with planters must maintain 24 foot clear unobstructed travel width around the planters, not including parking. Hardseape areas are permissible provided that they meet the 80,000 lb. Icad requirements and are at road level. 92. The gradient for a fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed fifteen (15) percent. (CFC 902.2.2.6 Ord. 99-14) 93. All traffic calming devices that could impede or slow emergency vehicle access are prohibited, except those approved individually on a map by map basis when they maintain the required travel widths and radii. 94. As required by the California Fire Code, when any portion of the facility is in excess of 150 feet from a water supply on a public street, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the facility, on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided. For this project on site fire hydrants are required. (CFC 903.2) 95. Prior to building construction, dead end road ways and streets in excess of one hundred and fifty (150) feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of accommodating fire apparatus. (CFC 902.2.2.4) 96. Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature block; and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. After the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be presented to the Fire Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system including fire hydrants shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building R:\S P\Harveston SP\PC Docs\COA-SP.doc 18 materials being placed on an individual lot. (CFC 8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and National Fire Protection Association 24 1-4.1 ) 97. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective Markers" shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations. (CFC 901.4.3) 98. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, approved numbers or addresses shall be provided on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Numbers shall be of a contrasting color to their background. Commercial, multi-family residential and industrial buildings shall have a minimum twelve (12) inches numbers with suite numbers a minimum of six (6) inches in size. All suites shall gave a minimum of six (6) inch high letters and/or numbers on both the front and rear doors. Single family residences and multi-family residential units shall have four (4) inch letters and/or numbers, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 901.4.4) 99. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a directory display monument sign shall be required for all apartment, condominium, townhouse or mobile home parks. Each complex shall have an illuminated diagrammatic layout of the complex which indicates the name of the complex, all streets, building identification, unit numbers, and fire hydrant locations within the complex. Location of the sign and design specifications shall be submitted to and be approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau prior to installation. 100. Prior to issuance of Certificate cf Occupancy or building final, based on square footage and type of construction, occupancy or use, the developer shall install a fire sprinkler system. Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. (CFC Article 10, CBC Chapter 9) 101. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on a requirement for monitoring the sprinkler system, occupancy or use, the developer shall install an fire alarm system monitored by an approved Underwriters Laboratory listed central station. Plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. (CFC Article 10) 102. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a "Knox-Box" shall be provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six (6) feet in height and be located to the right side of the main entrance door. (CFC 902.4) 103. All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry system for emergency access by fire fighting personnel. (CFC 902.4) 104. Prior to final inspection of any building, the applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire Department for approval, a site plan designating Fire Lanes with appropriate lane painting and or signs. 105. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, building final or occupancy, buildings housing high-piled combustible stock shall comply with the provisions of Uniform Fire Code Article 81 and all applicable National Fire Protection Association standards. The storage of high-piled combustible stock may require structural design considerations or modifications to the building. Fire protection and life safety features may include some or all of the following: an automatic fire sprinkler system(s) designed for a specific commodity class and storage arrangement, hose stations, alarm systems, smoke vents, draft curtains, Fire Department access doors and Fire department access roads. (CFC Article 81) R:\S P~-Iarveston SP\PC Docs\COA-SP.doc 19 106. Prior to the building final, speculative buildings capable of housing high-piled combustible stock, shall be designed with the following fire protection and life safety features: an automatic fire sprinkler system(s) designed for a specific commodity class and storage arrangement, hose stations, alarm systems, smoke vents, draft curtains, Fire Department access doors and Fire department access roads. Buildings housing high-piled combustible stock shall comply with the provisions California Fire Code Article 81 and all applicable National Fire Protection Association standards. (CFC Article 81) 107. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, the developedapplicant shall be responsible for obtaining underground and/or aboveground tank permits for the storage of combustible liquids, flammable liquids or any other hazardous materials from both the County Health department and Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 7901.3 and 8001.3) Special Conditions 108. Prior to issuance of building permits, fuel modification plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for review and approval for all open space areas adjacent to the wildland- vegetation interface. (CFC Appendix II-A) 109. Prior to issuance of building permits, plans for structural protection from vegetation fires shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for review and approval. The measures shall include, but are not limited to, enclosing eaves, noncombustible barriers (cement or block walls), and fuel modification zones. (CFC Appendix II-A) 110. Prior to building permit issuance, a full technical report may be required to be submitted and to the Fire Prevention Bureau for some commercial occupancies. This report shall address, but not be limited to, all fire and life safety measures per 1998 CFC, 1998 CBC, NFPA - 13, 24, 72 and 231-C. 111. Prior to issuance of a building construction in each phase a simple plot plan or map in an electronic file of the .DWG format must be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau. Alternative file formats may be acceptable, contact fire prevention for approval. 112. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Fire Code permit process and update any changes in the items and quantities approved as part of their Fire Code permit. These changes shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for review and approval per the Fire Code and is subject to inspection. (CFC 105) 113. The appricant shall submit for review and approval by the Riverside County Department of Environmental Health and City Fire Department an update to the Hazardous Material Inventory Statement and Fire Department Technical Report on file at the city; should any quantities used or stored onsite increase or should changes to operation introduce any additional hazardous material not listed in existing reports. (CFC Appendix II-E) TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT General Requirements: 114. If any of the following conditions of approval differ from the Specific Plan text or exhibits, the conditions enumerated herein shall take precedent. 115. The current park dedication requirement (Quimby) shall be satisfied with the 16.5 acre community park, the existing Winchester Creek Park and the HCA owned and maintained R:\S P\Harveston SP\PC Docs\COA-SP.doc 2O recreational areas identified in the Harveston Specific Plan including the 6.9 acre Lake Park, the 1.8 acre Village Green, the 2 acre Village Club and the mini parks totaling 1.5 acres. 116. The actual design of the 16.5 acre community park in Planning Area 1 shall be in substantial conformance with the conceptual designs and guidelines identified within the Specific Plan. Prior to submittal of construction plans, the developer shall meet with the Director of Community Services to determine the location and specifications of the park amenities to be provided on site. Construction plans and specifications must be approved bythe Director of Community Services. 117. All park and slope/landscape plans submitted for consideration shall be in conformance with the City of Temecula Landscape and Irrigation Specifications and Installation Details and the Park Land and Landscape Dedication Process. 118. The design of the community park in Planning Area 1 shall provide for pedestrian circulation and access for the disabled throughout the park. 119. Construction of the 16.5 acre community park site and proposed TCSD landscape maintenance areas shall commence pursuant to a pre-job meeting with the developer and TCSD Maintenance Superintendent. Failure to complywith the TCSD review and inspection process may preclude acceptance of these areas into the TCSD maintenance programs. 120. The developer, the developer's successor or assignee, shall be responsible for all maintenance of the park sites and slopes/landscaping areas until such time as those responsibilities are accepted by the TCSD. 121. The 16.5 acre community park shall be improved and dedicated to the City free and clear of any liens, assessment fees, or easements that would preclude the City from utilizing the property for public purposes. A policy of title insurance and a soils assessment report shall also be provided with the conveyance of the property. 122. All perimeter slope/landscape areas adjacent to roadways with a 66 foot right of way or larger adjacent to single family residential development shall be offered for dedication to the TCSD for maintenance purposes following compliance to existing City standards and completion of the application process. All other landscape areas, entry monumentation, signage, pedestrian portals, bus shelters and walls shall be maintained by the Homeowners Association (HCA), private maintenance association or property owner. 123. A ten (10) foot wide multi-use trail will be constructed around the Lake Park. An 8' paseo will be constructed within the Paseo Park and along the outside of the Loop Road. 124. Class II bicycle lanes will be included on both sides of Ynez Road, Date Street (within the project area), the Loop Road and the three entrance roads, and the adjacent portions of Margarita Road and Date Street (bordering the County line). Class II bike lanes shall be constructed in concurrence with the street improvements. 125. The developer is entitled to receive a credit against the park component of the City's Development Impact Fee (DIF) based upon the actual cost of improving the community park in Planning Area 1. The fee/credit issue shall be addressed pursuant to the execution of a Development Agreement or a Park Improvement Agreement between the applicant and the City prior to approval of the final map. 126. The 16.5-acre community park in Planning Area 1 shall be constructed, including the 90-day R:\S P\Harveston SP\PC Docs\OOA-SP.doc 21 maintenance and establishment period, and the conveyance accepted by the City Council prior to the issuance of the first residential building permit in Phase 2 (excluding models). Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the completion of the 16.5 acre Community Park is delayed because the final and permanent alignment of Ynez Road has not been determined which prevents the designation of the boundaries of the subject park, the City may, in the reasonable discretion of the City Manager and which shall not be unreasonably withheld, continue to issue building permits during the term of such uncertainty. The City Manager may require, and the Owner or Developer shall provide, the provision of notice to potential purchasers of the scope of improvements intended to occur within the subject park, including, but not limited to, lighted athletic fields. Notice, as required by the City Manager, may include, but is not limited to, signage (both on and off the anticipated park site), letters, displays or handbills. Prior to Approval of the Final Map: 127. The developer, or his assignee, shall offer for dedication, enter into an agreement and post security with the TCSD to improve the proposed parkland located in Planning Area 1 in accordance with the City standards, prior to the approval of the respective final map. 128. All areas intended for dedication to the TCSD for maintenance shall be identified on each final map by numbered lots and indexed to identify said lots numbers as a proposed TCSD maintenance areas. 129. All TCSD slope/landscaping maintenance easements shall be offered for dedication on each final map. 130. Construction drawings for all landscape medians and proposed TCSD slope/landscape maintenance areas shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Services prior to the approval of each final map. 131. The subdivider shall post security and enter into an agreement to improve all landscape medians and proposed TCSD maintenance areas prior to the approval of each final map. 132. The developer shall file a notice of intention with the Temecula Community Services District to initiate election proceedings for acceptance of residential street lights and perimeter slope/landscape into the TCSD maintenance program prior to approval of each final map. All costs associated with this process shall be borne by the developer. Prior to Issuance of Building Permits: 133. Prior to the installation of street lights or issuance of building permits, whichever comes first, the developer shall file an application and pay the appropriate fees to the TCSD for the dedication of arterial and residential street lights into the appropriate TCSD maintenance program. Prior to Issuance of Certificates of Occupancy: 134. Prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy within each phase map, the developer shall submit the most current list of Assessor's Parcel Numbers assigned to the final project. 135. It shall be the developer's responsibility to provide written disclosure of the existence or TCSD and its service level rates and charges to all prospective purchasers. R:\S P~Harveston SP\PC Docs\COA-SP.doc 22 OUTSIDE AGENCY LE'rI'ERS 136. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Eastern Municipal Water District transmittal dated March 31, 1999, a copy of which is attached. 137. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Rancho Water transmittals dated November 9, 1999 and September 8, 2000, a copy of which is attached. 138. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the County of Riverside Department of Environmental Health transmittal dated February 1,2000, a copy of which is attached. 139. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District transmittal dated January 1,2000, a copy of which is attached. I40. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Department of Transportation transmittal dated November 15, 1999, a copy of which is attached. 141. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Eastern Information Center, Department of Anthropology transmittal dated November 3, 1999, a copy of which is attached. 142. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Temecula Valley Unified School District transmittal dated November 5, 1999, a copy of which is attached. 143. Comply with the terms and conditions of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife and Army Corps of Engineer permits obtained for this project. 144. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Riverside Transit Agency transmittal dated May 31,2001, a copy of which is attached. By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be subject to Community Development Department approval. Applicant Name R:\S P\Harveston SP\PC DOCS\COA-SP.doc 23 Board of Directors President David J. Slawson ~ce President Clayton A. Record, Jr. Marion V. Ashley Richard R. Hall Rodger D. Sierns Board Secretary Mary C, White General Manager John B. Brudin Director of the Metropolitan Water District of So. Calif. Clayton A. Record, Jr. Treasurer Joseph J. Kuebler. CPA Legal Couttsel Redwine and Sherri{l October 4, 2000 County of Riverside Environmental Health Department P.O. Box 1206 Riverside, CA 92502 Dear Colleague: SAN83-Sewer Will Serve 1,921 Units, Located west of Margarita Rd., north of Date St. in the County of Riverside. EMWD is willing to provide water and/or sewer service to the subject project. The provisions of service are contingent upon the developer completing the necessary arrangements in accordance with EMWD rules and regulations. The arrangements may include plan check, facility construction, annexation, payment of financial participation charges, coordination with a sub-agency, reclaimed water facilities and other requirements. The developer should contact EMWD's New Business Development Department early in the process to determine the necessary arrangements for service. EMWD's ability to serve is subject to limiting conditions, such as water shortages, regulatory requirements, legal issues, or conditions beyond EMWD's control. Thank you for your cooperation in serving our mutual customers. questions, please call me at (909) 928-3777, ext. 4518. Civil Engineering Assistant New Business Development If you have any MHS/ C: Ms. Patty Anders City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Mailing .4ddress: \ \ fpsnts2\ J_\WORDPROC\WORD\NEW_BUS[. 11 \Wil 1 Serve\Year2000\marg&datest. doc Post Office Box 8300 Pen'is, CA 92572-8300 Telephone: (909) 928-3777 Fax: (909) 928-6177 £ocation: 2270 Tremble Road Perris, CA 92570 ltan V/mr Board of Directors: Ralph lt. Daily Pmsident Doug Kulberg Sr. Vice President Lisa D. Herman Csaba F. Ko Scott A~ McIntyre Jeffrey L. Minkler George M. Woods John F. Heonigar General Manager Phillip L. Forbes November 9, 1999 Patty Anders, Case Planner City of Temecula Planning Department 43200 Business Park Drive Post Office Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 SUBJECT: WATER AVAILABILITY SWEETWATER SPECIFIC PLAN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 161 VARIOUS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0418 AND PA99-0419 Dear Ms. Anders: Please be advised that the above-referenced development is located within the boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD). Water service, therefore, would be available upon completion of financial arrangements between RCWD and the property owner along with the construction of any required on-site and/or off-site water facilities. If fire protection is required, the customer will need to contact RCWD for fees and requirements. Water availability would be contingent upon the property owner signing an Agency Agreement that assigns water management rights, if any, to RCWD. If you have any questions, please contact an Engineering Services Representative at this office. Sincerely, RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT Steve Brannon, P.E. Development Engineering Manager 99~S B:mc303',F012-T1 ~FCF Rancho California Water District September 8, 2000 Patty Anders, Case Planner City of Temeeula Planning Department 43200 Business Park Drive Post Office Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 SUBJECT: WATER AVAILABILITY HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN Dear Ms. Anders: Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located within the boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD). Water service, therefore, would be available upon completion of financial arrangements between RCWD and the property owner. RCWD has reviewed the Specific Plan for the Harveston development. As stated above, RCWD will provide water service to this project. The proposed demands have been incorporated into both the RCWD Water Resource Master Plan and Water Facilities Master Plan. These plans have been reviewed and adopted by the District's Board of Directors. The review of the above-referenced documents affirms that the water demand for Linda M. Fregoso Distxiet Secretary/Admlnistrative th~s area was evaluated and incorporated into the RCWD Master Plans. Services Manager C. Mich~el Cowett Also, please refer to our letter of August 23, 2000 (copy enclosed) concerning the Best Best & Krieger LLP Gene~Co,~, proposed lake. RCWD highly recommends that the issue of utilizing reclaimed water be completely addressed in the site master plan and specific plan. Ify0u have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT Steve Brannon, P.E. Development Engineering Manager Enclosure SEP 1 1 2000 By TO: FROM: RE: County of Riverside HEALTH SERVICES AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING DEPARTMENT ATTN: Patty Anders GREGOR DELLENBACH, Interim Supervisor SWEETWATER SPECIFIC PLAN DATE: February 1,2000 The Sweetwater Specific Plan dated September 1999 has been received and reviewed. Will-serve letters from the water and sewering agencies will be required and the use of reclaimed water on all parklands and other greenbelt zones and other landscaped zones is highly recommended. in order to serve domestic water and provide sanitary sewer service to the project area, "will-serve" letters from Rancho California Water District (RCWD) and Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD) respectively will be required. Domestic water demands are calculated to be 2.02 MGD and wastewater flows to be 0.723 MGD. The report advises that RCWD and EMWD can handle those demands. The report identifies that 254.7 acres of park, open space and school sites that should be eligible to receive reclaimed water. These irrigation systems should be designed to accommodate a reclaimed water system. The concerns regarding re-claimed water have not been addressed in the docmnent reviewed. Sincerely, Gregor e enbach, Interim Supervisor GD:dr (909) 955-8980 DAVID P. ZAPPE General !Vlanagcr-Chict' Enginccr RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT City of Temecula Planning Department Post Office Box 9033 Temecula, California 92589-9033 Attention: F/I:~W ~/ ~ ~'t'~) ~/~.~ - Ladies and Gentlemeh: Re: 1995 MARKET STREET RIVERSIDE. CA 92501 909.955.1200 909.788.9965 FAX The D strict does not norma y recommend cond t OhS for land divisions or other land use cases in incorporated cities. The D strict also does not plan check city land use cases, or provide State D v s on of Real Estate letters or other f cod hazard reports for such cases Distnct comments/recommendations for such cases are normally limited to terns of specific ~nterest to the District includ ng D strict Master Drainage Plan facilities, other regional flood control and dra nage fac t es which ecu d be cons dered a logical componenfor extens on of a master plan system, and District Area Drainage Plan fees (development m t gation fees). In add t on, information of a general nature is provided. The District has not reviewed the proposed project in detail and the following checked comments do not in any way constitute or imply District approval or endorsement of the proposed project with respect to flood hazard, public health and safety or any other such issue: This project would not be impacted by District Master Drainage Plan facilities nor are other facilities of regional interest proposed. This pro ect involves District Master Plan facilities. The D str ct w accept ownership of such facilities on written request of the City. Fac t es must be constructed to District standards and District plan check and inspection will be required for District acceptance. Plan check, inspection and administrative fees will be required. v'/" Th s prelect may propose channe s, storm drains 36 riches or larger in diameter, or other facilities that co Id be corlsidered regional in nature and/or a Logical extension of the adopted ~'~l~¢,.&l~;TA Lj.C.~F,-. Master Draina~te Plan. ~Th~..District.would co, nsi.d_er. ownership ct such fac tes on wrtten request of me City. hacflltles [nust Be cons[ructeu..)u _ standards, and District plan check and inspection will be required for District acceptance. Ftan checK, inspection and administrative fees will be required, v/' Th s project is located within the mts of the District's ~tJR.SJS,1A ~F-..Ir-/fiCfJgg/~'ti Drainage Plan for which dra nage fees have been adopted applicable tees thou d be paid by ca~hier s check or money order only to t~e Flood Centre D strict prior to issuance of bu ding or grading permits, whichever comes first. Fees to be paid should be at the rate in effect at the t me of issuance of~he actual permit. GENERAL INFORMATION This project may require a National Pollutant Discharge Elim nat on System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board, C earance for grading, recordation or other final ~approva/should not be given until the City has determined that ~he project has been granted a perrn t or is shown to ue exempt. If this project involves a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) mapped flood plain, then the City should require tf~e applicant to provide al studies caculations plans and other nformation required to meet FEMA requirements, and shou d further require that the applicant obta n a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) prior to grading, recordation or other final approval of the project, and a Letter of Map Rev s on (LOMR) prior to occupancy. If a natural watercourse or mapped flood plain is impacted by this project, the City should require the applicant to obtain a Section 1601/1603 Agreement from the California Department of Fish and Game and a Clean Water Act Section 404 Permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, or written correspondence from these ag, encies ' ' ' e ro'ect is exemet from these requ rements. A Clean Water Act Section 401 Water Quality Certification indcatngth p ,~- ~ ~¢ ,~e ~onal Wa er Qua t ControlBoard r, or to ,ssuance of the Corps'~04 may be required from ,,,e ,o~al Ca.i,or..i- .. g' ' Y P: : permit. Very truly yours, STUART E. MCKIBBIN Senior Oivil Engineer Date: STATE OF CALIFORNIA--BUSINESS, AND HOUSING AGENCY GRAY DAVIS, Governor DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 8 464 W Fourth Street, 6th Floor MS 726 San Bernardino, CA 92401-1400 PHONE (909) 383-6327 FAX (909) 383-6890 November 15, 1999 08-Riv-79-R3.300 Ms. Patty Anders Assistant Planner PO Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Dear Ms. Anders: NOV 1 7 1999 3y Sweetwater Specific Plan The City of Temecula should ensure that the applicant complies with the current Congestion Management Program in place as defined by the Riverside County Transportation Commission (1997). Please forward all future plans and documents to this office regarding this proposal. If you have any questions, please contact Jim Belty at (909) 383-4473 or FAX (909) 383-6890 Sincerely, LINDA GRIMES, Chief Office of Forecasting/ IGR/CEQA Review c: Mosle Boyd, State Clearinghouse ~999 11:26eat o- Page2] SENT BY:UGH 3-gg ;11:07A# ; /~CH 90969454~;# 2 ALIFORNIA tlISTORICAL I ESOURCES iNFORMATION YSTEM Eastem Information Center Department of Anthropology University of C;d~nla Riverside, CA 9282T-0415 Phone (g09) 787-5745 Fax (~) 7a?.s4o9 DATE: 11~: C~se Transmltt~! RM'e~0nco DesJ~ion: ~1 Recor~ at the Eam-ero laformatioa Ceat, er of lhe Califor lxeea reviewed to determine ifthb project would ~lve~se~ __ A Vha~ 1 e~,~ral mmm~ ,mx;IX (MF ,f )id~! Tho Jubu~uion of i infirm'al reloUrca auu:mgenu~a ty~pod, b l~o~o~ld~a~et Repom pt~imredbythc C~li~=i~ Off d(a). Dooembar 19~9. Pb~e Il ]q~e II1 COMMENT~: if you have ~my questlom, please contact u~, RCE t Historical Resources Iuformatlon System have affect prehistoric or h~odc cultural reaou~ce~: ~somms ~M ooutsJm or b &~,-~-~ m lua~wu ou]tu~d mthd ~or ~ ~ulluml r~u.*-q~m. A ~ I Itud)' oukund ~oun~a. Howevor, duo to th= nature of Ul~ o1' Hi~orio Pr~czv~n, 7'r~ Plmm~lA* ~B-~-~ ~utt,~lt:ioo in i~e, o~ & oombla~tlon of tim two.] Esstern Information Center November 5, 1999 TEMECULA VALLEY Unified School District Dav,dB.^,mB. NOV 1 6 1999 By BOARD OF EDUCATION Patti Smith Richard Sharer Ed Eider Jerry Hobbs Member Barbara Tooker Ms. Patty Anders City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 SUBJECT: PA99-0419 (Sweetwater) Dear Ms. Anders: Temecula Valley Unified strongly supports the inclusion of a twelve-acre elementary school within the proposed Sweetwater Specific Plan. An elementary school within the community will be vital to serve the students generated by the homes there, as well as other City of Temecula residents. There is a need to open this school as early as August of 2000. As was discussed in an earlier meeting with City Manager Shawn Nelson, and Deputy City Manager, Gary Thomhill, this may require an acceleration of the school site portion of the specific plan. Lennar Communities has worked closely with the school district in establishing the location and configuration of the school site shown in the proposed plan. The District encourages an expeditious approval of that aspect of the plan as shown. Sincerely, I Temecula Valley Unifie/d)Sc~ool District 1/Coordinator of Facilities Services Cc: Dave Gallaher, Director of Facilities Services 31350 Rancho Vista Road / Temecula, CA 92592 / (909) 676-2661 RTfl ID:9096841007 MflY 31'01 9:14 No.O01P.02 May 31,2001 Riverside Transit Agency 1825 Third Street P.O. BOX 59968 Riverside, CA 92517 Phone: (909) 684-0850 Fax: (909) 684-1007 City of Temccula Planning Dcpartanent 1 met recently with Matt Fagan to discuss the H'arveston Specific Plan. It appears that all attempts havc been made to design thc pmjcct in a transit-friendly mazmcr, including thc open-ended clustering otresidentlal units. The mixed.uses in the Village Green Center are also conducive to transit usage.. We hope to jointly design a pilot program to encourage transit usage and thc usc of other alternatives to 1he single occupancy vehicle. It would be beneficial for the community to provide transit access lo adjacent areas, sudt as thc Promenade Mall, middle and high schools and local employment centers. Please continue to keep us posted so we can maximize coordination ofp)anning efforts. Thm~k you for the opportunity to comment on this project. Cis LeRoy ~ Planning Dir¢cto-"f'-" EXHIBIT D GENERAL PLAN CONSISTANCY ANALYSIS R:\S P~Harveston SP~Ciiy CouncilXRESO CC GPA SP.doc 9 GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY The Specific Plan is consistent with the General Plan and serves to implement all aspects of the General Plan relevant to the designated area. A Specific Plan is a plan adopted either by ordinance or resolution for a particular area of land. A Specific Plan may contain its own development standards (zoning), and thus provides greater flexibility in the distribution of the land uses. The Harveston Specific Plan is intended to be supportive of, and consistent with, the goals and policies of the Temecula General Plan. It has been written to implement the Specific Plan designation assigned to Harveston Specific Plan area by the General Plan, updated on November 9, 1993. The purpose of this section is to ensure that the Specific Plan is consistent with the goals and policies of the City of Temecula's General Plan as required per Government Code Section 65454. The following are the ten elements included within the Temecula General Plan: 1. Land Use Element 2. Circulation Element 3. Housing Element 4. Open Space/Conservation Element 5. Growth Management/Public Facilities Element 6. Public Safety Element 7. Noise Element 8. Air Quality Element 9. Community Design Element 10. Economic Element The goals and policies for each General Plan element have been evaluated in the following pages. Following each goal of the General Plan elements, specific policies are laid out. Following each goal and policy, a statement is made in italics, indicating how the Specific Plan is consistent with that goal and/or policy. Ln some cases, it is indicated that the specific goal or policy is not applicable to the Specific Plan. The following sections list the applicable goals and policies of the above elements of the General Plan. FEBRUARY 2001 LAND USE ELEMENT LA~O USE ELEMENT Goal 1: A complete and integrated mix of residential, commercial, industrial, recreational, public and open space land uses. Discussion: The proposed Harveston Specific Plan has been prepared in conformance with the City of Temecula General Plan and is consistent with the City of Temecula's zoning code and General plan densities and intensities. The Specific Plan Project seeks to create a community character and quality that compliments the surrounding area. The proposed plan contains a variety of housing products and designs, which would cater to different groups of home buyers/renters in the Oty of Temecula. Additionally, development of the service commercial component of the Specific Plan will provide opportunities for the region and Harveston area. The Plan also includes a generous amount of open space and recreational opportunities _~ 70 acres), and more than adequate public facilities and services. Policies 1.1 Review all proposed development plans for consistency with the commumty goals, policies and implementation programs of this General Plan. The proposed Harveston Specific Plan has been prepared in conformance with the City of Temecula General Plan and is consistent with community goals, policies, and implementation programs outlined in the General Plan. 1.2 Promote the use of innovative site planning techniques that contribute towards the development of a variety of residential product styles and designs including housing suitable to the community's labor force. The proposed plan contains a variety of housing products and innovative site planning designs (see Section 3.0, Land Use Plan and Section 10.0, Design Guidelines), which would cater to different groups of home buyers/renters in the City of Temecula` 1.3 Require the development of unified or clustered community-level and neighborhood-level commemial centers and discourage development of strip commercial uses. The Harveston Specific Plan proposes a Mixed Use Village Center, which would include uses such as retail, restaurant, office, daycare, worship, and a private club facility and fitness center. Additional commercial uses are located in the Service Commercial area of the Specific Plan. The Specific Plan does not encourage development of strip commercial uses. 1.4 Consider the impacts on surrounding land uses and infrastructure when reviewing proposals for new development. The proposed plan is consistent with the City of Temecula general plan densities and intensities and seeks to create a community character and quality that reflects the surrounding area. The Harveston E1R provides an analysis of the project's impacts on surrounding land uses and infrastructure. Infrastructure is consistent with the General Plan requirements and will be installed concurrently with development. FEBRUARY 2001 2 p:~oo~Nt~z~pco~stsr~c~oc LAND USE ELEMENT 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 1.10 Support the development of light industrial, manufacturing, research and development, and office uses to diversify Temecula's economic base. 7he Harveston Specific Plan proposes a l l2.4-acre service commercial area that includes a mixture of uses that could serve or expand upon the adjacent business park development. This service commercial component of the Specific Plan will provide employment opportunities and needs for the region and Harveston area. Provide well-defined zoning and development standards and procedures to guide private sector planning and developmem. The Harveston Specific Plan creates development standards consistent with the philosophy of the City of Temecula Development Code. Detailed development standards for the Specific Plan have been prepared (see Section 1LO, Development Standards) to manage implementation of general or unique conditions in each Planning Area. Require the preparation of specific plans as designated on the Specific Plan Overlay to achieve the comprehensive planning and phasing of development and infrastructure. The Harveston Specific Plan has been prepared in order to achieve comprehensive planning and phasing of development and infrastructure. Consider taking the lead on preparing specific plans for areas designated on the Land Use Plan that have multiple landowners. This policy is not applicable, because it is a City directed policy. However, the subject site is designated Specific Plan on the General Plan Land Use Map. Encourage flexible zoning techniques in appropriate locations to preserve natural features, achieve innovation site design, achieve a range of nansifion of densities, provide open space and recreation facilities, and to provide necessary amenities and facilities. The Harveston Specific Plan includes components that achieve many innovative site designs and a range of densities within the proposed residential development and the mixed use Village Center. The plan also provides for a variety of open space and recreation facilities including a Lake, a Lake Park, Paseo Park, Arroyo Park, and three mini park, a comprehensive trail system and bike paths. Pursue oppommities to locate higher density housing with supporting commercial and public uses on the west side of 1-15. This policy (locating higher density housing with supporting commercial and public uses on the west side of 1-15) is not the responsibility of the Harveston development. This development is located on the east side of l-15. Although the Specific Plan area is located east of l-15 it does include higher density housing and supporting commercial and public uses. FEBRUARY 2001 3 LAND USE ELEMENT Goal 2: A City of diversified development character where rural and historical areas are protected and co-exist with newer urban development, Discussion: The Harveston Specific Plan has been designed with sensitivity to its surrounding uses and seeks to conform to the overall character of the arec~ However, Harveston Specific Plan area is not located within a historical or rural area of the City. Policies 2.1 Provide physical and visual buffer areas to create a transition between rural residential and agricultural areas and commercial, industrial and other higher density residential development. The proposed plan includes extensive uses of paseos and landscaping setbacks/buffers to create physical and visual buffers to create appropriate transitions within the different types of development. 2.2 Apply rural development standards to specified areas of the City to maintain the rural character of those areas. The policy is not applicable because the rural development standards do not apply to this project. The proposed project is in an area adjacent to existing development and the 1-15 Freeway and has been designated for mixed use development by the City's General Plan. 2.3 Define the rural and historical areas of the community to be conserved, and establish a procedure for adding areas or altering boundaries as necessary. This policy is not applicable to the Harveston project. It is the responsibility of the City of Temecula to define the rural and historical areas of the community to be conserved and establishing a procedure for ~,dding or altering the boundaries if necessary. The City has already defined rural areas within the community and assigned L (.5-2 dwelling units per acre), VL (.2-.4 dwelling units per acre) and HR (0-. 1 dwelling units per acre)residential designation on the General Plan Land Use Map. In addition, the City has adopted the Old Town Specific Plan which has defined a historical area of the community to be conserved. 2.4 Require the use of landscaped, open space buffers along roadways in-lieu of residential subdivision walls where feasible in light of noise and other constraints. The Harveston Specific Plan Design Guidelines (Section 10.0) has incorporated the use of landscape and open space buffers along the roadways in-lieu of residential subdivision walls where feasible in light of noise and other constraints. Figure 10.4 (Community Fencing and Walls Plan)presents a variety of wall and fence types within Harveston to meet the intent of this General Plan Policy. The project perimeter walls are required for noise mitigation; however, they will be planted with vines to create a green wall. The interior of the project will allow a variety of walls, fences and landscaping that will be well landscaped. FEBRUARY 2001 4 ~,:e~o~ss~coss~rresc~voc LAND USE ELEMENT Goal 3: A land use pattern that will protect and enhance residential neighborhoods. Discussion: The design of the Harveston Specific Plan is sensitive to and compatible with the surrounding uses and takes into account existing conditions and natural features. While the plan seeks to create a distinguishable character for the Harveston Specific Plan area, it will be compatible with and will enhance the adjacent uses. Policies 3.1 Consider the compatibility of proposed projects on surrounding uses in terms of the size and configuration of buildings, use of materials and landscaping, preservation of existing vegetation and landform, the location of access routes, noise impacts, traffic impacts, and other environmental conditions. The design of the Harveston Specific Plan is sensitive to and compatible with the surrounding uses and takes into account existing conditions in terms of the size and configuration of buildings, use of materials and landscaping, the location of access routes, noise impacts, traffic impacts and other environmental conditions. Specific Plan Land Use designations are consistent with the General Plan Land Use designations. The General Plan designations were reviewed for consistency and compatibility with adjacent development. The Specific Plan land uses have been developed to be complimentary to and compatible with the surrounding uses. Residential designations have been appropriately located next to those of like intensity. The Community Park has been situated to provide a buffer to the existing light industrial uses. The Service Commercial area has been located adjacent to 1-15 and west of Ynez Road. In addition, Design Guidelines and Development Standards within the Specific Plan assure the appropriate use of color, materials, architectural styles, landscaping, etc., to ensure compatibility with surrounding uses. 3.2 Provide infill development incentives in the residential sections of the Old Town area through the Old Town Specific Plan. The policy is not applicable because this is a City directed policy and the proposed project is not located in Old Town. 3.3 Require parcels developed for commercial or industrial uses to incorporate buffers that minimize the impacts of noise, light, visibility of activity and vehicular traffic on surrounding residential uses. Location of the service commercial uses with their lack of direct roadway access to the residential uses and special features such as landscape buffers, incorporated into the design of the service commercial, will minimize the impacts on surrounding residential uses. 3.4 Protect single-family residential areas from encroachment by commercial uses. The Harveston Specific Plan proposes a service commercial area (adjacent to the existing business park) away from existing residential and the proposed residential planning areas. Landscape buffers will provide separation between the Service Commercial and residential uses. FEBRUARY 2001 5 ,:~o~s~oozarcoNstovec~voc LAND USE ELEMENT 3.5 3.6 3.7 Additionally, the Specific Plan area consists of distinct planning areas with specific development standards thai will prevent any encroachment by the commercial uses into residential areas. Obtain aviation easement as required by the Comprehensive Land Use Plan for the French Valley Airport to ensure that landowners acknowledge the impacts associated with aircraft. This policy is not applicable because the Harveston Specific Plan area is not within the Comprehensive Land Use Plan for the French Valley Airport, and therefore, no aviation easement is required for the project. Require proposed development to evaluate the incremental traffic impacts on local roads throughout the proposed project phasing in order to ensure that any adverse impacts to local roads in residential areas are avoided or adequately mitigated. A Traffic Analysis for this project was prepared by Wilbur Smith Associates (dated July 19, 2000) and reviewed and approved by the City's Traffic Engineer. According to the Analysis, impacts from the project at opening year (2002) and at project buildout (2005) result in a minimum Level of Service D at all critical intersections within the vicinity of the project provided that certain transportation improvements are made by the project. These improvements have been identified and included as mitigation measures within the project's Environmental Impact Report. The project has already paid approximately 2.5 million and 1.8 million into Assessment Districts 156 and 161 (respectively), which contributed to improvements on Ynez, Winchester and Margarita Roads. In addition, the project wdl pay its fair share of Development Impact Fees (DIF); implement all recommendations contained within the Traffic Analysis for traffic improventents; as well us support the City's efforts to design and secure jurisdictional approval for the construction of a new interchange at 1-15 at Cherry and/or Date Street. Require proposed development to evaluate the incremental traffic impacts on local roads throughout the proposed project phasing in order to ensure that any adverse impacts to local roads in residential areas are avoided or adequately mitigated. Please see consistency analysis for Policy 3.6, above. Goal 4: A development patterns that preserve and enhance the environmental resources of the Study Area. Discussion: The Harveston Specific Plan has taken into consideration the natural and man-made opportunities and constraints in determining its land use designations and their intensities. Except for the preservation and enhancement of the Arroyo Park in its natural state, there are no other natural features/hazards that would affect the land use designation within the project site. FEBRUARY 2001 6 LAND USE ELEMENT Poficies 4.1 Enforce hillside grading standards to naturalize the effects of grading, requixe the preservation of unique natural features and to encourage a bread range of hillside architectural and site planning solutions. The project site will be mass graded and will result in a balance of cut and fill materials on the site. The project will be graded in a manner which is similar to the other specific plans in the City of Temecula (Paloma del Sol, Margarita Village, Roripaugh Estates, Campos Verdes, Rancho Highlands) and surrounding Riverside County (Warm Springs, Vail Ranch, Red Hawk). The grading will result in modifications to the natural terrairr This type of grading is necessary to achieve the General Plan/Specific Plan land use designations for the site. Hillside grading standards are more appropriately applied in the areas designated L (.5-2 dwelling units per acre) , VL (.2-.4 dwelling units per acre) and HR (0-.1 dwelling units per acre) on the General Plan Land Use Map. 4.2 Consider the constraints of natural and man-made hazards in determining the location, type and intensities of new development. The Harveston Specific Plan takes into consideration the natural and man-made realities and constraints in determining its land use designations and their intensities. Except for preservation of the Arroyo Park in its natural state, there are no other natural features/hazards that would affect the land use designation within the project site. Man-made hazards such as existing and future roadways have been also considered Additionally, the proposed project incorporates contour grading techniques in grading the site in order to maintain the integrity of the natural setting. 4.3 Cooperate with other agencies to develop Multi-species Habitat Conservation Plans in western Riverside and northern San Diego Counties. This policy is not applicable, because it is a City directed policy, and it is the responsibility of the City of Temeculc~ 4.4 Work with the utility districts to develop a trail system and enhance the natural resources along the San Diego Aqueduct, creeks, and other utility easements where feasible. The proposed Specific Plan area is not in the vicinity of the above aqueduct, however, the Specific Plan provides a comprehensive trail system with connection point to the off-site trails along Santa Gertrudis Creek. The project also proposes enhancement and preservation of a 13.8-acre Arroyo Park consistent with U.S. Army Corps and Fish and Game guidelines. The Arroyo Park includes a nature trail system. 4.5 Work with the Riverside County Flood Control District and other responsible agencies on the design of the flood control project for Mardeta Creek, Temecula Creek, Pechanga Creek, and other waterways in the City. The Specific Plan preparation has included contact with the Riverside County Flood Control and other responsible agencies on the issue of waterways and flood control in the City of Temecula. FEBRUARY 2001 7 p:~Oa~N~2~eCONStSr~c~ooC LAND USE ELEMENT 4.6 4.7 Consider alternative flood control methods to reduce capital and maintenance costs and provide recreational and open space opportunities. Section 5.0, Infrastructure Plan, of the Specific Plan includes the proposed drainage plan, which incorporates existing drainage courses into recreational open space areas (£e., lO.5-acre Arroyo Park and 2.5-acre Paseo Park). Conserve the resources of Pechanga, Temecula and Murrieta Creeks through appropriate densities of development, setbacks, landscaping, and site design of surrounding projects. This policy is not applicable, because it is a City directed policy. The project is however consistent with the General Plan density designations for the property. Goal 5: A land use pattern and intensity of development that encourages alternative modes of transportation, including transit, bicycling, and walking. Discussion: The Harveston Specific Plan includes a transit plan, which provides for alternative mode of transportation. The transit plan has been developed with input provided from the Riverside Transit Authority (RTA) and incorporates the service needs of the RTA. The Village Center, High- density residential (13-20 dwelling units/acre) and the M2 (Medium-density residential 7-13 dwelling units/acre) are located at the "core' of the project to provide the critical density needed to support public transit. Bus turnouts and shelters are included, as required by the RTA and approved by the Department of Public Works. Additionally, the Harveston Specific Plan includes a comprehensive paseo and trail system providing the project's residents the opportunity'to walk, jog, or bike around the entire community. Bike trails and transit facilities will also be provided along the project roadways. The Specific Plan includes a Mixed Use Village Center, which consists of a mixture of compatible uses such as retail, restaurant, office, daycare, worship, and a private club facility and fimess center. The Mixed Use Village Center creates an environment where walking is encouraged. For ease of access this "core area" is connected to various residential areas within the development via walking and biking trails. Policies 5.1 Include in the Development Code and through other ordinances a package of incentives to encourage development to include: 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Additional active parkland Development of parkland and ~ails Preservation of historic buildings or sites Additional open space Preservation and enhancement of natural habitat Additional public or community facilities Additional or improved public spaces or plazas for community use Additional amenities in multifamily developments FEBRUARY 2001 8 p:UOOO~N~Oz~pCONStrr~CrVOC LAND USE ELEMENT 10. 11. Transit facilities and/or additional tight-of-way along future transit corridors Housing that meets the needs of very low and low income households. Provision of cultural facilities. The Harveston Specific Plan has included many of these items. This is further discussed below. Additional Active Parkland. The project provides 57.4 acres of parkland/recreation facilities (including the Winchester Creek Park). This figure does not include the 15.9 acres within the LDZ's, which brings the total to 73.3 acres. Development of Parkland and Trails. The parkland acreage is discussed above. The Open Space and Recreation Plan (Figure 6.1 of the Specific Plan) and Bicycle Plan (Figure 4.8 of the Specific Plan) depict the open space/recreational opportunities within the Plan, as well as comprehensive walking and bicycle network within the project. A ten foot (10') wide trail easement along the western perimeter of the project. In addition to providing opportunities within the project, these networks also tie into the existing City wide bicycle plan. Further, it is anticipated that these systems will ultimately become a component of the City's Trails Master Plan (currently under development). · Preservation of Historic Buildings or Sites. There are no known historic buildings or sites at the project location. Additional Open Space. As discussed above, the project is providing 57.4 acres of recreation facilities. Based upon the requirements of the City of Temecula Community Services Department, 26. 75 acres or parkland is required. The project exceeds this amount by 30.65 acres. Preservation and Enhancement of Natural Habitat. As part of the Environmental Impact Report, a biological assessment was prepared for the project site. No sensitive or endangered species were identified on-site. The project will impact 2.86 acres of "waters of the United States." As mitigation for this impact, the creation of 8 acres of a riparian corridor must be created on-site. The Arroyo Park has been developed to serve as this mitigation and will encompass 13.8 acres. This is greater than what was required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers for mitigatiov~ In addition, should the Cherry Street interchange be approved for this project, this acreage may be subject to an increase. Additional Public or Community Facilities. Public and Community facilities are included within many of the recreation facilities within the project. It is anticipated that people residing within the project and those within the vicinity of the project will use those facilities. These include the elementary school, the Lake, Lake Park, Paseo Park, Village Green as well as the Community Park. In addition, private facilities will be provided to serve the Harveston residents. Additional or Improved Public Spaces or Plazas for Community Use. These have been listed above. In addition, public and quasi-public spaces will be provided within the Village Center. Also, mini-parks are included within most of the residential neighborhoods. FEBRUARY 2001 9 p:e~oz~vcoNs~sravczooc LAND USE ELEMENT 5.2 5.3 5.4 Additional Amenities in Multifamily Developments. It is anticipated that the multifamily component of the project will contain amenities, which are typically found within these types of development. The multi-family development is centrally located adjacent to the Village Center and within immediate proximity of the project's recreation facilities. Transit Facilities and/or nd~litional right-of-way Along Future Transit Corridors. The transit plan has been developed with input provided from the Riverside Transit Agency (RTA). Potential Transit Routes & Stops have been developed for current and.future transit needs, with input from RTA. · A transit station is planned within the Village Center and will be integrated into the design of the streetscape. The transit station will be installed when adjacent development occurs, in accordance with the requirements of the RTA. It is anticipated that the buses will initially make a small loop through the project, entering the site from Margarita Road, passing by the Elementary School, Lake and Lake Park, Village Green and Village Center and exiting the site via Margarita Road. Future transit stops will be provided within the project, along the Loop Road. Transit stops are also proposed on the perimeter of the project, along Date Street, Ynez Road and Margarita Road. In addition, transit stops will be provided in key locations within the Service Commercial portion of the project. All of the transit stops are anticipated to connect to the current and future major transit hubs within the area, including the Promenade Mall. Housing That Meets the Needs of Very Low and Low Income Households. The project includes a variety of housing types, which will provide a wide array of housing opportunities for both owners and renters. It is not anticipated that Harveston will provide housing that meets the needs of very Iow and low income households. Provision of Cultural Facilities. These are discussed above in the recreation facilities. Require the provision of pedestrian and bicycle linkages from residential areas to open space/recreation facilities, commercial and employment centers. The Harveston Specific Plan includes a comprehensive paseo and trail system providing the project's residents the opportunity to walk, jog, or bike around the entire community. Bike trails and transit facilities will also be provided along the project roadways. (See Figures 4.8, Bicycle Plan and 11.5, Mixed Use Vehicular Circulation and Parking). Encourage variety in the design of sidewalks and trails with respect to alignment and surface materials to provide a convenient and enjoyable experience for the users. The sidewalks and paseos included in the proposed plan incorporate unique design features, landscaping, and amenities offering users a variety of different recreational experiences. Many of the proposed paseos will meander through the adjacent landscape. Provide grade separated bike paths along major arterials where feasible. Ensure that non-grade separated bike paths are designated for safety. The proposed Specific Plan includes Class II bike lane along Margarita Road, consistent with the City of Temecula General Plan (see Figure 10.1-4, Margarita Road). FEBRUARY 2001 10 p:~ooo~oza~coNst~r~c~c LAND USE ELEMENT 5.5 5.6 5.7 5.8 5.9 5.10 Designate Mixed Use Village Centers on the Land Use Plan to provide areas within the community that are urban in character, contain a mixture of compatible uses, and are designed to reduce or eliminate the need for the automobile in traveling to or within Mixed Use Village Centers. The Specific Plan includes a Mixed Use Village Center, which consists of a mixture of compatible uses such as retail, restaurant, office, daycare, worship, and a private club facility and fitness center. The Mixed Use Village Center creates an environment where walking is encouraged. For ease of access this "core area" is connected to various residential areas within the development via walking and biking trails. Encourage higher density residential, mixed use development, and support'mg public and community facilities within Mixed Use Village Centers. The Mixed Use Village Center proposed within the proposed Harveston plan includes mixed use development, public and community facilities, and higher density residential uses. Establish design guidelines, development standards, and incentive programs for uses within Mixed Use Village Centers. The proposed plan establishes guidelines, development standards, and incentive programs for Mixed Use Village Center uses. (See Section 11.4.7, Mixed Use Overlay Zone). Develop a plan to link Mixed Use Village Centers by lxalls and potential transit systems including bus, shuttle and light rail. The Harveston Specific Plan includes extensive system of paseos and potential transit facilities that link the Mixed Use Village Center to the remainder of the community. (See Figure 11.15, Mixed Use Vehicular Circulation and Parking). Ensure that architecture, landscape design, and site planning within Mixed Use Village Centers emphasizes a pedestrian scale and safe and convenient access between uses. The Mixed Use Village Center is pedestrian oriented and facilitates access between uses within the Village. Walking and biking trails are provided to connect the Mixed Use Village Center to other areas within the Specific Plan. (See Figure 11.16, Mixed Use Village Center Pedestrian Circulation). Ensure that adequate public gathering areas or plazas are incorporated within Mixed Use Village Centers to allow for social interaction and community activities. The Mixed Use Village Center propased within the Harveston Specific Plan allows for gathering areas and plazas. Additionally, the Village Green creates a public gathering place, which will encourage social interaction and community activities, such as concerts or farmers markets. 5.11 Discourage the development of strip commercial centers that increase automobile dependency. FEBRUARY 2001 11 LAND USE ELEMENT The Harveston Specific Plan does not propose the development of strip commercial uses within the Specific Plan aret~ Its objective is to create a pedestrian friendly environment where the use of the car is not encouraged. Goal 6: A plan for Old Town Temecula that enhances economic viability, preserves historic structures, addresses parking and public improvement needs, and establishes design standards to enhance and maintain the character and economic viability of Old Town. This goal is not applicable because the Specific Plan is not located within the Old Town area of the City of Temecula. This goal is not applicable because it is a City directed goal. Goal 7: Orderly annexation and development of unincorporated area within Temecula's Sphere of Influence. This goal is not applicable because the Harveston Specific Plan is not located within the unincorporated areas of Temecula's Sphere of Influence. Goal 8: A City that is compatible and coordinated with regional land use patterns. Discussion: The Specific Plan land uses have been laid out consistent with the City of Temecula General Plan, which takes into account larger regional goals and policies. Additionally, the Specific Plan was coordinated with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the State Department of Fish and Game, which take a more regional and comprehensive approach. Policies 8.1 Provide a pattern of land uses that maintain and enhance the viability of neighboring communities including the City of Murrieta, and the counties of Riverside and San Diego, through compatible uses and linkages. The compatibility between the Harveston project and the adjacent developments has been discussed in Policy 3.1. The architectural styles, design guidelines and development standards will create a development that will maintain and enhance the viability of neighboring communities including the City of Murrieta and the Counties of Riverside and San Diego. Compatible uses and linkages have been provided throughout the project. 8.2 Provide a system of open space that is coordinated with regional open space uses to comprehensively address the management and conservation of resources. The Arroyo Park open space proposed within the Harveston Specific Plan was coordinated with the United States Army Corps of Engineers and the California Department ofFish and Game as FEBRUARY 2001 12 LAND USE ELEMENT 8.3 8.4 a mitigation measure to address the management and conservation of resources. The Harveston Open Space and Recreation Plan (Figure 6.1) provides a system of open space that is coordinated with the City-wide and regional system. The project will tie into the Santa Gertrudis Trail System, as well as provide a 10' wide easement along the western project boundary for regional trial systems. Participate with the Airport Land use Commission in the planning process in the preparation of the Comprehensive Land use Plan for the French Valley Airport, to the extent feasible. The policy is not applicable because the Harveston Specific Plan is not within the Comprehensive Land Use Plan for the French Valley Airport. Continue to paxticipate with the Western Riverside Cotmcil of Governments in the preparation of plans and programs addressing regional issues, including the Growth Management Strategy, Comprehensive Transportation Plan, Water Resources S~'ategy, and School Facilities Plan. This Policy is the responsibility of the City of Temecula and not that of the Harveston project. The project will be reviewed for consistency with the City of Temecula Growth Management Program Action Plan. In addition, transportation items have been ,~trlressed above (see Policy 3.3). Water resources and project impacts have been discussed and mitigated as necessary in the project's Environmental Impact Report. An elementary school site is currently under construction on the project site and sufficient resources are available to accommodate the middle and high school students generated by the project. FEBRUARY 2001 13 ~:~ooo~v~o~a~coNsts~vc~voc CIRCULATION ELEMENT C/RCULATION ELEMENT Goal 1: Strive to maintain a Level of Service "D" or better at all intersections within the City during peak hours and Level of Service "C" or better during non-peak hours. Discussion: A Traffic Analysis for this project was prepared by Wilbur Smith Associates (dated July I9, 2000) and reviewed and approved by the City's Traffic Engineer. According to the Analysis, impacts from the project at opening year (2002) and at project buildout (2005) result in a minimum Level of Service D at all critical intersections within the vicinity of the project provided that certain transportation improvements are made by the project. Ten intersections have been identified as needing improvements (2005 with 2 of the 10 requiring improvements at year 2002). These improvements are located at the following intersections: · Winchester & Ynez Roads; · Winchester Road & 1-15; · Winchester Road & Jefferson Avenue; · Winchester & Margarita Road; · Overland Drive & Margarita Road; · Overland Drive & Ynez Road; · Overland Drive & Jefferson Avenue; · Murrieta Hot Springs & Margarita Roads; · Murrieta Hot Springs & Alta Murrieta Roads; · Murrieta Hot Springs & Jefferson Avenue. Overall project impacts (percentage) to these intersections have been identified in the EIR. Mitigation measures have been included within the project's Environmental Impact Report to ensure that this Goal is met. Policies 1.1 Establish street standards and all new roadway facilities shall be constructed or upgraded to meet City standards where feasible. The proposed Specific Plan includes a Circ{dation Plan and standards, which will dictate construction and upgrade of the roadway facdities consistent with City standards. All roadway and intersection designs will comply with City standards providing safe and efficient traffic patterns and circulation. 1.2 Require an evaluation of potential u'affic impacts associated with new development prior to project approval, and require adequate mitigation measures prior to, or concurrent with, project development. Please see consistency analysis for Goal I, above. 1.3 Use the Circulation Element Roadway Plan to guide detailed planning and implementation of the City's roadway system. FEBRUARY 2001 14 r:uooo~m~oz~coNstrr~c~voc CIRCULATION ELEMENT 1.4 1.5 The Circulation Plan within the Harveston Specific Plan has been produced based on the City's Circulation standards. Pursue trip reduction and transportation systems management measures to reduce and limit congestion at intersections and along streets within the City. Please see consistency analysis for Goal 1, above. Trip reduction measures include: · Transit provisions · Location of housing near employment areas · An extensive bicycle path network · An extensive walking/pedestrian network. Transportation System Management measures include (General Plan): · Adding turn lanes or restricting turning movements during peak traffic periods at congested intersections · Widening of intersection approaches to accommodate additional through movement lanes or to improve visibility · Installation of bus turnout bays · Pavement marking modifications/improvements · Completion of "missing links" in the roadway network Update every three years, or as needed, "build-out" traffic forecasts to monitor the impact of development approvals and the adequacy of the Circulation Element Roadway Plan. The policy is not applicable because it is a City directed policy. Goal 2: Enhance traffic safety on City streets. Discussion: The Circulation Plan within the Harveston Specific Plan minimizes traffic conflicts and promotes safe traffic circulation within the Specific Plan area. A Loop Road is included within the circulation plan for ease of access to different residential planning areas, reducing undesirable through traffic within the residential areas. The Circulation Plan encourages safety for all pedestrian traffic by separating vehicular and pedestrian traffic, especially in commercial and high-density areas. As such, the plan includes a safe and efficient paseo, urban trail and sidewalk network, providing pedestrian and bicycle circulation in conjunction with the roadway network. Policies 2.1 The City shall enforce speed restrictions throughout the City. This policy is not applicable because it is a City directed policy. FEBRUARY 2001 15 CIRCULATION ELEMENT 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 Require that future roads and improvements to existing roads be designed to minimize traffic conflicts such as those which result from curb parking maneuvers and uncontrolled access along heavily traveled roadways. The Circulation Plan within the Harveston Specific Plan minimizes traffic conflicts and promotes safe traffic circulation within the Specific Plan area. A Loop Road is included within the circulation plan for ease of access to different residential planning areas, reducing undesirable through traffic within the residential areas. Require that the development of new private driveways do not introduce significant traffic conflicts along major streets and primary residential collectors roads. The Harveston Specific Plan does not propose new private driveways off of the major streets or primary residential collector roads. Three project entries are proposed off the major streets (2 on Margarita Road and 1 on Date Street). Internal to the project, neighborhoods will access the Loop Road. All driveway locations are subject to review and approval of the Director of Public Works. Require that vehicular and pedestrian traffic be separated to the maximum extent feasible. The Circulation Plan within the Harveston Specific Plan encourages safety for all pedestrian traffic by separating vehicular and pedestrian traffic, especially in commercial and high density areas. As such, the plan includes a safe and efficient paseo, urban trail and sidewalk network, providing pedestrian and bicycle circulation in conjunction with the roadway network. Establish an ongoing maintenance_program to ensure the safety of the City's roadway system. This policy is not applicable because it is a City directed policy. Goal 3: A regional transportation system that accommodates the safe and efficient movement of people and goods to and from the community. Discussion: The Harveston Specific Plan includes City-wide and regional circulation roadways. The Specific Plan currently includes roadway segments, which are consistent with the City's General Plan Circulation Element (Margarita Road, Date Street, Ynez Road). In addition, a City directed alternative has been included in the Plan. With the inclusion of the project's roadway network, transit provisions, bicycle and pedestrian pathways, the project will contribute to this goal of accommodating the safe and efficient movement of people and goods to and from the community. Policies 3. I Support the completion of the Riverside County Master Plan of Arterial Highways. The Circulation Plan within the Harveston Specific Plan includes roadway extensions and future improvements consistent with the City's existing Circulation Element Plar~ FEBRUARY 2001 16 CIRCULATION ELEMENT 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 Actively pursue the construction of a new intemhange north of Winchester Road and other recommended system improvements outside its jurisdiction in cooperation with Caltrans, the City of Murrieta, Riverside County, and local developers. Measures should be taken to preserve anticipated right-of-way needs and to identify funding mechanisms for the interchange improvements. The location ora new interchange north of Winchester Road is currently being reviewed through a Project Study Report (PSR) by Ccdtrans. It is anticipated that Caltrans will complete this review by mid-2001 and the location for this interchange will be determined. The project contains two alternatives for the location of this interchange. Subdivision maps are also being processed which will reserve additional right-of-way for the ultimate location for the interchange. It should be noted that the applicant will support the City's efforts to design and secure jurisdictional approved for the construction ora new interchange at 1-15 at Cherry and/or Date Street. Actively pursue the improvemems to existing interchanges within the City and construction of new overpasses as required to achieve the adopted service level standards. Reference response to Policy 3.2. In nrldition, a mitigation measure in the project's E1R requires improvements to the l-15/Winchester Road interchange. This mitigation would help achieve level of service standards required in Goal 3. Coordinate with the Riverside Transit Agency to provide fixed route Uansit service (bus or shuttle) along major transportation corridors connecting to regional employment and commercial areas, airports, health care facilities, and major recreation areas. The Harveston Specific Plan will comply with the City of Temecula and the Riverside Transit Agency to facilitate provision of transit service. Coordination and correspondence with the Riverside Transit Agency was completed as part of the Harveston EIR preparation. Provide for express transit service through implementation of park-and-ride facilities along regional transportation corridors. This policy is not applicable because it is a City directed policy, and park-and-ride facilities are not proposed with the Harveston project. Coordinate with Western Riverside Council of Governments to identify, protect, and pursue opportunities for a light rail transit along major transportation corridors which connect Temecula to other population centers. This policy is not applicable because it is a City directed policy, and it is the responsibility of the City of Temecula. Encourage the formation of a special Southwest County agency or task force which would be responsible for identifying and prioritizing selected system improvements having regional significance and the development of funding sources which would allow for the timely implementation of these improvements. FEBRUARY 2001 17 CIRCULATION ELEMENT This policy is not applicable because it is a City directed policy, and it is the responsibility of the City of Temeculc~ Goal 4: An efficient City circulation system through the use of transportation system management and travel demand management strategies. Discussion: This goal is not applicable because it is a City directed goal. However, the Harveston EIR incorporates Travel Demand Management (TDM) requirements, as mitigation measures, consistent with the Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP). The proposed project will comply with the conditions and requirements set forth by the City of Temecula and will implement all traffic signals as required by the traffic study in order to maximize efficient flow of traffic. The Harveston Specific Plan includes a comprehensive pedestrian trail system and incorporates features such as bus turnouts and shelters, as required by the Director of Public Works and the Riverside Transit Agency (RTA). Policies 4.1 Establish a City-wide Circulation System Phasing and Financing Program for the orderly implementation of system improvements identified in the Circulation Element. This policy is not applicable because it is a City directed policy. 4.2 Require proper spacing and interconnect traffic signals where feasible to maximize the smooth progression of traffic flows and to minimize delay and stop and go conditions which result in higher vehicle emissions and noise levels. The proposed project will comply with the conditions and requirements set forth by the City of Temecula and will implement all traffic signals as required by the traffic study in order to ma-~imize efficient flow of traffic. 4.3 Discourage the provision of on-street (curbside) parking along principal arterial roadways to minimize traffic conflicts and increase the traffic carrying capacity of these roadways. The Specific Plan does not propose on-street parking along the principal arterial roadways (i.e., Date Street, Margarita Road, and Ynez Road). 4.4 Require new development to incorporate design features which facilitate transit service and encourage transit ridership such as bus pullout areas, covered bus stop facilities, efficient trail systems through projects to transit stops, and incorporation of pedestrian walkways that pass through subdivision boundary walls. The Harveston Specific Plan includes a comprehensive pedestrian trail system and incorporates features such as bus turnouts and shelters, as required by the Director of Public Works and the Riverside Transit Agency (RTA). FEBRUARY 2001 18 CIRCULATION ELEMENT 4.5 4.6 4.7 Require specific plans and other mixed use projects to provide an intemal system of trails linking schools, shopping centers, Uansit, and other public facilities within residential areas. The Harveston Specific Plan includes an extensive internal system of trails/paseos that connect the Mixed Use Village Center to the school, the lake~lake park and community park, and different residential areas. Provide a comprehensive system of Class I and/or Class II bicycle lanes to meet the needs of cyclist traveling to and from work and other destinations within the City. Consistent with the City of Temecula General Plan, the Harveston Specific Plan provides Class II bicycle lanes along most roadways within the Specific Plan area for recreational as well as ease of access between different planning areas and uses. (See Figure 4.8, Bicycle Plan). Encourage a mix of uses within a project designed to maximize internal trip making, maximize the use of parking facilities, and to promote a shift from auto use to pedestrian and bicycle modes of travel. The proposed project is pedestrian oriented encouraging internal movement between the different uses and planning areas via trails and bike lanes. 4.8 Encourage the provision of additional regional public transportation services. 4.9 4.10 4.11 The Harveston Specific Plan will comply with the City of Temecula and the Riverside Transit Agency to facilitate provision of transit service. Coordination and correspondence with the Riverside Transit Agency was completed as part of the Harveston EIR preparation. Require transportation demand management plans to be submitted for preliminary review at the Specific Plan or Plot Plan stage of site development and submitted for final approval prior to the issuance of building permits, in accordance with the City's Transportation Demand Management Ordinance. The Harveston EIR incorporates Travel Demand Management (TDM) requirements, as mitigation measures, consistent with the Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP). Encourage the implementation of employer Travel Demand Management (TDM) requirements included in the Southern California Air Quality Management District's Regulation 15 of the Air Quality Management Plan. The Harveston E1R incorporates TDM requirements as mitigation measures consistent with the AQMP. The City shall establish a local Congestion Management Plan and monitor the performance and effectiveness of travel demand management programs within the City. This policy is not applicable because it is a City directed policy. FEBRUARY 2001 19 CIRCULATION ELEMENT Goal 5: An adequate supply of private and public parking to meet the needs of residents and visiWrs of the City. Discussion: The proposed Specific Plan contains parking requirements and standards (see Section 11.0, Development Standards) to provide adequate parking facilities on-site. A tapered street section will be used at internal neighborhood intersections and in locations where on-street parking is otherwise adequately provided. Adequate on-street parking has been defined in Section 11 of the Specific Plar~ The Mixed Use Village Center provides the opportunity for "shared joint use parking" which helps minimize the number of ingress and egress points. Policies 5.1 Enforce City parking ordinances and standard design requirements which apply. The Harveston Specific Plan is prepared bused on the City's General Plan and other applicable ordinances (i.e., parking ordinances) and standard design requirements. Parking standards, are contained in Section 11.0, Development Standards, of the Specific Plan. 5.2 Require the consolidation of parking, and related circulation facilities, where appropriate, to minimize the number of ingress and egress points onto arterials. The Mixed Use Village Center provides the opportunity for "shared joint use parking" which helps minimize the number of ingress and egress points. 5.3 Provide additional public parking in the Old Town area where feasible through common parking areas or establishment of a parking district. This policy is not applicable because the Harveston Specific Plan is not within the Old Town Specific Plan area. 5.4 Require project developers to provide adequate on-site parking and/or to contribute to a program to acquire and maintain off-site facilities. The proposed Specific Plan contains parking requirements and standards (see Section 11.0, Development Standards) to provide adequate parking facilities on-site. 5.5 Encourage underground parking or parking structures where economically feasible in commercial The proposed Specific Plan contains parking requirements and standards (see Section 11.0, Development StarMards) to provide adequate parking facillties on-site. Additional meusures will be incorporated to meet the demand and requirement in commercial areus. 5.6 Encourage joint development of parking facilities (e.g. joint-use of parking facilities) where feasible to maximize the efficient use of available parking. FEBRUARY 2001 20 p:xzooo~m~oz~coNstrrsvc~ooc CIRCULATION ELEMENT The proposed Specific Plan contains parking requirements and standards (see Section ILO, Development Standards) to provide adequate parldng facilities on-site. Additional measures will be incorporated to maximize efficiency. Goal 6: Safe and efficient alternatives to motorize travel throughout the City. Discussion: The proposed project provides for a separate system of paseo/trails that will be utilized by pedestrians and non-motorized modes of transportatiotr This system provides for ease of access between the different planning areas. This system of trails will also connect to the regional trails for ease access to other areas within the City. PoHcies 6.1 Promote the safety of pedestrians and bicyclist by adhering to uniform trail standards and practices and communicating safety practices to the public. Unless modified through this Specific Plan, all trails shall be constructed to ultimate City standards and practices that will ensure public safety. 6.2 Off-street bicycle and equestrian trails should minimize the number of locations where automobile cross traffic will be experienced. The proposed project provides for bicycle trails throughout the project site (see Figure 4.8, Bicycle Plan). The Specific Plan's loop road system will minimize the number of locations for automobile cross traffic. 6.3 Ensure accessibility of pedestrian facilities to the elderly and disabled. The Harveston Specific Plan seek~ to ensure accessibility of facilities to all users, including the elderly and the disabled. ADA standards will be complied with throughout the Specific Plan. 6.4 Traffic signals along bike routes and where significant pedestrian activity is present shall be properly timed and periodically adjusted to allow for the safe movement of these non-motorized modes. The proposed Specific Plan includes a Circulation Plan and standards, which will dictate construction and upgrade of the roadway facilities consistent with City standards. All roadway and intersection designs will comply with City standards providing safe and efficient traffic patterns and circulation. 6.5 Adequate linkages shall be provided for non-motorized modes, between residential areas and commercial / employment activity centers, public institutions, and recreation areas. The proposed project provides for ease of access between the different planning areas by non- motorized modes of transportation. As such, the project includes designated trail systems for use by pedestrians and bicycles and other non-motorized modes of transportation. FEBRUARY 2001 21 CIRCULATION ELEMENT 6.6 Motorized vehicles and motorized cycles shall be prohibited from using the City's recreation trail system. The Harveston Specific Plan provides for a separate system of paseos/trails that will be utilized by pedestrians and non-motorized cycles only. Motorized vehicles and motorized cycles will be prohibited from using the pedestrian designated paseos/tralls within the Specific Plan. Goal 7: A truck circulation system that provides for the safe and etTlcient transport of commodities alld also minimizes noise, air pollution and traffic impacts to the City. Discussion: The Circulation Plan for Harveston project is based on the City of Temecula Circulation Element and does not designate primary truck routes on roadways providing access to different residential areas within the project site. The proposed project provides for measures to facilitate access and loading by trucks in order to minimize any potential circulation conflicts. Policies 7.1 Designate primary truck routes on selected arterial streets to minimize the impacts of truck traffic on residential areas. The Harveston Specific Plan Circulation Plan is based on the City of Temecula Circulation Element and does not designate primary truck routes on roadways providing access to different residential areas within the project site. 7.2 Require loading areas and access ways for trucks that minimize or eliminate conflicts with automotive and pedeslrian areas to maintain safe and efficient traffic circulation. The proposed project provides for measures (see Section 11.0, Development Standards) to facilitate access and loading by trucks in order to minimize any potential circulation conflicts. FEBRUARY 2001 22 HOUSING ELEMENT ~. HOUSING ELEIVEENT Goal 1: A diversity of housing opporamifies that satisfies the physical, social and economic needs of existing and future residents of Temecula. Discussion: The Specific Plan will provide 1,921 dwelling units on a wide range of lots to accommodate the existing and projected housing needs in the City. The residential development will provide a range of housing type options in terms of cost, density and type. The Harveston Specific Plan includes a wide variety of housing types within each density category and proposes a sustainable land use concept by incorporating the open space and recreational opportunities through a generous selection of park types. Policies 1.1 Provide an inventory of land at varying densities sufficient to accommodate the existing and projected housing needs in the City. The Harveston Specific Plan provides 1,921 dwelling units on individual lots ranging in size from 2,000 to 5,000 square feet. The target density for the proposed project is 6.3 dwelling units per acre. The Harveston Specific Plan also includes 300 high-density residential dwelling units at a target density of 17.8 units per acre. In addition to the high density, three densities of Low Medium (578 dwelling units), Medium 1 (475 dwelling units), and Medium 2 (568 dwelling units), are included in the Specific Plan. The proposed housing types will provide a range of opportunity, which will satisfy the needs of various segments of the local housing market. 1.2 Encourage residential development that provides a range of housing types options in terms of cost, density and type, and provides the opportunity for local residents to live and work in the same community by balancing jobs and housing types. The proposed project introduces a wide range of housing type in terms of cost, density and design in order to meet the needs of the different segments of the local population. The project also includes commercial uses, which would create jobs locally and regionally. 1.3 Require a mixture of diverse housing types and densities in new developments around the mixed use village centers to enhance their people-orientation and diversity. The Harveston Specific Plan proposes high density housing in the Mixed Use Village Center overlay along with other uses. Additionally, in close proximity to the Mixed Use Village Center are proposed a variety of housing types and densities. 1.4 Support the use of innovative site planning and architectural design in residential development. The proposed project includes a wide variety of housing types within each density category. These varieties are achieved through innovative site planning and design and will cater to the needs of different groups of clients. FEBRUARY 2001 23 HOUSING ELEMENT 1.5 1.6 Encourage the use of clustered development to preserve and enhance important environmental resources, and maintain important areas in open space. The Harveston Specific Plan proposes an efficient land use concept where different residential development types, including clustered development, are introduced and vast areas of open space are incorporated throughout the Specific Plan in the form ora community park, mini parks, paseo park, lake, lake park, arroyo park, and paseos. Promote the development of compatible mixed use projects that promotes and enhances the village concept, facilitates the efficient use of public facilities, and supports alternative u'ansit options. The Harveston Specific Plan is a project that incorporates different types of uses such as residential, service commercial, school, parks, and Mixed Use Village Center. Within the Mixed Use Village Center there is a wide range of uses which promote a pedestrian oriented concept (see Figure 11.16, Mixed Use Village Center Pedestrian Circulation). Paseos, trails, and bike lanes are provided for ease of access to recreational and other public facility uses (i.e., school, and church). Goal 2: Affordable housing for all economic segments of Temecula, Discussion: The Harveston Specific Plan is promoting a variety of housing opportunities that accommodate the needs of all economic levels of the population, and is providing opportunities to meet the City ' s fair share of low- and moderate-income housing. The project includes housing affordable to households with earnings in excess of approxirnately 120percent of the current median income of the County of Riverside. The higher density dwelling units will be more affordable to buyers as well as renters. Policies 2.1 Promote a variety of housing opportunities that accommodate the needs of all economic levels of the population, and provides opportunities to meet the City's fair share of low- and moderate- income housing. The Harveston Specific Plan provides 1,921 dwelling units on individual lots ranging in size from 2,000 to 5,000 square feet. The target density for the proposed project is 6.3 dwelling units per acre. The Harveston Specific Plan also includes 300 high-density residential dwelling units at a target density of 17.8 units per acre. In addition to the high density, three densities of Low Medium (578 dwelling units), Medium 1 (475 dwelling units), and Medium 2 (568 dwelling units), are included in the Specific Plan. The proposed housing types will provide a range of opportunity, which will satisfy the needs of various economic levels of the local housing market. 2.2 Support innovative public, private and non-profit efforts in the development of affordable housing, particularly for special needs groups. This policy is not applicable because it is a City directed policy. FEBRUARY 2001 24 HOUSING ELEMENT 2.3 2.4 Encourage the use of non-traditional housing models, including single-room occupancy structures (SRO) and manufactured housing, to meet the needs of special groups for affordable housing, temporary shelter and/or transitional housing. This policy is not applicable because it is a City directed policy. Pursue all available forms of private, local, state and federal assistance to support development and implementation of the City's housing programs. The proposed Harveston project includes housing affordable to households with earnings in excess of approximately 120 percent of the current median income of the County of Riverside. The higher density dwelling units will be more affordable to buyers as well as renters. Goal 3: Removal of governmental constraints in the maintenance, improvement and development of housing, where appropriate and legally possible. This goal is not applicable because it is a City directed goal. Policies 3.1 Provide reasonable processing time and fees for new consm~ction or rehabilitation of housing. This policy is not applicable because it is a City directed policy. 3.2 Consider mitigating development fees for projects providing affordable and senior citizen housing. This policy is not applicable because it is a City directed policy. 3.3 Periodically review City development standards to ensure consistency with the General Plan and to facilitate high-quality affordable housing. This policy is not applicable because it is a City directed policy. Goal 4: Conservation of the existing affordable housing stock. This goal is not applicable because it is a City directed goal. Policies 4.1 Monitor and regulate, if necessary, the number of affordable units eligible for conversion to market-rate units and develop programs to minimize the loss of these units. This policy is not applicable because it is a City directed policy. FEBRUARY 2001 25 p:uooo~rcoNs~sr~c~ooc HOUSING ELEMENT 4.2 4.3 Develop rehabilitation programs that are dkected at preserving the integrity of the housing stock. This policy is not applicable because it is a City directed policy. Support the efforts of private and public entities in maintaining the affordab'llity of units through implementation of energy conservation and weatherization programs. This policy is not applicable because it is a City directed policy. Goal 5: Equal housing opportunity for all residents in Temecula. Discussion: The Harveston Specific Plan promotes housing opportunities for all persons regardless of race, religion, sex, marital status, ancestry, national origin, age, physical handicap, or color. Policies 5.1 Encourage and support the enforcement of laws and regulations prohibiting the discrimination in lending practices in the sale or rental of housing. The Harveston Specific Plan promotes housing opportunities for all persons regardless of race, religion, sex, marital status, ancestry, national origin, age, physical handicap, or color. 5.2 Assure and support the efforts of others to ensure that unrestricted access to housing is available to all segments of the community. The proposed project supports and encourages unrestricted access to housing to all interested clients without discrimination. 5.3 Encourage housing design standards that promote the accessibility of housing for the elderly and disabled. The Specific Plan anticipates the use of certain residential product types by elderly and disabled, therefore, it incorporates the City's building codes and ADA measures in order to accommodate such use. 5.4 Encourage and consider supporting local private non-profit groups that address the housing needs of the homeless and other disadvantaged groups. This policy is not applicable because it is a City directed policy. FEBRUARY 2001 26 OPEN SPACE / CONSERVATION ELEMENT OPEN SPACE ] CONSERVATION ELEMENT Goal 1: A high quality parks and recreation system that meets the varying recreational needs of residents. Discussion: A major feature of the Harveston Specific Plan is the system of parks and landscaped parkways with paseos, which link the lake complex, and school recreational facilities and the community park in the Open Space and Recreation Program. The Project Park Program is extensive and provides a vast array of recreational opportunities in which all members of the community can participate. Further, the program incorporates many diverse elements in a coordinated, cohesive plan that interrelates with and links the various neighborhoods of the community with each other and to certain destination points, such as the lake, school, parks and mixed-use village. 1.1 Apply the policies and standards contained in the City's Park and Recreation Master Plan to acquire sufficient parkland and recreation facilities to support new development. The Harveston Specific Plan includes a substantial amount of open space as community' park, mini parks, arroyo park, lake park, pasco park and paseos and trails throughout the development. The provision of parks and open space complies with the City's Park and Recreation Master Plan. 1.2 Require the dedication of parkland and development of facilities to be consistent with the Parks and Recreation Master Plan. The proposed plan complies with the Parks and Recreation Master Plan. 1.3 Require developers of residential projects greater than fifty dwelling units to dedicate land based on the park acre standard of five (5) acres of usable parkland to one thousand (1,000) population, or the payment of in-lieu fees in accordance with the parks and Recreation Master Plan. Adequate amount of parks and open space has been dedicated based on the above standards and calculations. 1.4 Park credit for land with floodplains shall be given in accordance with the Parks and Recreation Master Plan. This policy is not applicable because the project site does not contain any flood plains. 1.5 Pursue the joint use of public lands available and suitable for recreation purposes, including lands under the jurisdiction of the Riverside County Flood Control District, Southern California Edison, water districts, and other public agencies. This policy is not applicable because the project proposes community and neighborhood parks throughout the development, and it is not in close vicinity of any public lands that can be utilized for joint use. FEBRUARY 2001 27 OPEN SPACE / CONSERVATION ELEMENT 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 1.10 Encourage the enhancement and preservation of significant natural features, including riparian areas, rock outcroppings, sensitive habitat areas and viewpoints through park design and site development. One feature of the Harveston Specific Plan is the Arroyo Park, which is a naturalistic park that preserves the existing creek bed and creates a riparian environment. The Arroyo Park will provide a different recreational experience to the residents of the community. Encourage the enhancement and preservation of historic structures and landscape features in the design, development and use of parks. The design and development of the different parks within the Specific Plan area will be based on extensive use of landscape features to create a unique experience. No historic structures exist within the project area. Encourage public safety and compatibility with adjacent use in park design and development, including location of buildings, activity areas, lighting and parking. Design features such as special architectural treatment, perimeter and interior landscaping, and lighting will be incorporated into the project for safety and compatibility with the adjacent uses. The Community Park has been designed consistent with City standards (see Figure 6.3, Community Park Detail). Coordinate long range park and open space planning with Riverside County and the City of Murrieta. This policy is not applicable_ because it is a City directed policy. Maximize pedestrian and bicycle access to existing and new parks as an alternative to automobile access. The Specific Plan project proposes extensive trails and bike lanes that would connect to all the different planning areas and uses, including parks. 1.i 1 Encourage joint recreational use between school and park facilities when appropriate. 1.12 This policy is not applicable because the community park and the proposed elementary school are not in close adjacency to one another, therefore making it difficult to encourage true joint use. Consider the establishment of development impact fees to cover the cost of capital improvements for parks and recreation facilities needed to serve new development. This policy is not applicable because it is a City directed policy. FEBRUARY 2001 28 OPEN SPACE / CONSERVATION ELEMENT Goal 2: Conservation and protection of surface water, groundwater and imported water Discussion: The Harveston Specific Plan will coordinate with Riverside County Flood Control District to design necessary flood control improvements for Murrieta Creek and Temecula Creek that preserve the important natural features and resources of the local creeks and the riparian forest of the Santa Margarita River Watershed, to the maximum extent feasible. The project will protect groundwater in cooperation with the Rancho California Water District and conserve potable water by requiring water conservation techniques in all new development. The project will also encourage utilization of reclaimed water, if available, for irrigation and other appropriate uses. Policies 2.1 Coordinate with Riverside County Flood Contxol District to design flood control improvements for Murfieta Creek and Temeeula Creek that preserve the important natural features and resources of the local creeks and the riparian forest of the Santa Margarita River, to the maximum extent feasible. The Harveston Specific Plan provides for drainage and flood control facilities and improvements in accordance with the City of Temecula and the Riverside County Flood Control District requirements. (See Section 5. O, Infrastructure Plan). 2.2 Identify and protect groundwater resources fi.om depletion and sources of pollution in cooperation with the Rancho California Water District. The proposed project will comply with standard specifications to protect groundwater resources from depletion and sources of pollution in cooperation with the Rancho California Water District. 2.3 Conserve potable water by requiring water conservation techniques in all new development. The Harveston Specific Plan will comply with Title 20, California Administrative Code Section 1604 09 (Appliance Efficiency Standards), which establish efficiency standards that set the tna~imum flow rate of all new showerheads, lavatory faucets, etc., as well as Health and Safety Code Section 17621.3 which requires Iow-flush toilets and urinals in virtually all buildings. 2.4 Use reclaimed water for the irrigation of parks, golf courses, publicly landscaped areas and other feasible applications as service becomes available fi.om RCWD and EMWD. The proposed project will encourage utilization of reclaimed water, if available, for irrigation and other appropriate uses. FEBRUARY 2001 29 v:eoo~m~z~vcosstsrEsczooc OPEN SPACE / CONSERVATION ELEMENT 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.9 2.10 Require the use of soil management techniques to reduce erosion, eliminate off-site sedimentation, and prevent other soil-related problems that may adversely affect waterways in the community. All construction activities that results in the disturbance of at least five acres of total land area or activity which is part of a larger common plan of development of five acres or greater, will obtain the appropriate State general permit for National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits and pay the appropriate fees. All development within the Specific Plan boundaries will be subject to future requirements adopted by the City to implement the NPDES prograna Mitigation measures may include, but not be limited to: onsite retention; covered storage of all outside storage facilities; vegetated swales; monitoring programs, etc. Regulate and manage lands adjacent to or affecting watercourses as stipulated by the Regional Water Resources Control Board. This policy is not applicable because it is a City directed policy. The Specific Plan Project has, however, obtained 401 permits from the RWQCB. Ensure that approved projects have filed a Notice of Intent and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan in accordance with the Federal Clean Water Act, prior to issuance of building permits. This policy is not applicable because it is a City directed policy. The EIR does, however, require filing ora Notice of lntent as mitigation. Ensure adequate inspection and enforcement of the requirements of General Construction Permits, particularly related to erosion control during grading and construction. This policy is not applicable because it is a City directed policy. Participate in regional planning for the Santa Margarita River Watershed in conjunction with Federal, State, Regional and local agencies, and non-profit organization. This policy is not applicable because it is a City directed policy. Participate in water resources management planning to facilitate the long-term availability of water resources for western Riverside County. This policy is not applicable because it is a City directed policy. FEBRUARY 2001 30 OPEN SPACE / CONSERVATION ELEMENT Goal 3: Conservation of important biological habitats and protection of plant and snimal species of concern, wildlife movement corridors, and general biodiversity. Discussion: Bused upon the findings of the biological studies performed for the site, the proposed project site does not include significant onsite biological resources. The project proposes an arroyo park, which will include the creation of a riparian habitat. The Arroyo Park will be developed consistent with the mitigation requirement and permits of the U.S. Army Corps and State Department of Fish and Game. The Specific Plan will also incorporate local native vegetation, mature trees, and/or other significant vegetation into the landscape design of the proposed development. PoHcies 3.1 Require development proposals to identify significant biological resources and provide mitigation, including the use of adequate buffering; selective preservation; the provision of replacement habitats; the use of sensitive site planning techniques including wildlife corridor/recreational txails; and other appropriate measure. Bused upon the findings of the biological studies performed for the site, the proposed project site does not include significant onsite biological resources. The project proposes an arroyo park, which will include the creation of a riparian habitat. The Arroyo Park will be developed consistent with the mitigation requirement of the U.S. Army Corps and State Department ofFish and Game. 3.2 Work with State, regional and non-profit agencies and organizations to preserve and enhance significant biological resources on publicly owned lands. This policy is not applicable because it is a City directed policy. 3.3 Coordinate with the County of Riverside and other relevant agencies in the adoption and implementation of the Riverside County Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan. This policy is not applicable because it is a City directed policy. 3.4 Encourage developers to incorporate native drought-resistant vegetation, mature trees, and other significant vegetation into the site and landscape design for proposed projects. The Harveston Specific Plan will incorporate local native vegetation, mature trees, and/or other significant vegetation into the landscape design of the proposed development (see Section 10.0, Design Guidelines). 3.5 Maintain an inventory of existing natural resources in the City through periodic updates of the Master Environmental Assessment. This policy is not applicable because it is a City directed policy. FEBRUARY 2001 31 OPEN SPACE / CONSERVATION ELEMENT 3.6 3.7 Limit the recreational use of designated open space areas where sensitive biological resources are present. This policy is not applicable because it is a City directed policy. Maintain and enhance the resources of the Temecula Creek, Santa Margarita River, Pechanga Creek and other water ways to ensure the long-term viability of the habitat, wildlife, and wildlife movement corddurs. This policy is not applicable because it is a City directed policy. Goal 4: Conservation of energy through the use of available technology and conservation practices. Discussion: To reduce energy use, the proposed Specific Plan will utilize energy saving techniques such as orienting buildings properly (i.e., north/south lot orientation), planting trees to take advantage of the sun, ensuring adequate roof overhangs, providing properly insulated walls and providing simple heat storage systems such as dual-paned windows. The project development will also include utilization of energy efficient building materials for construction in order to reduce energy use. Policies 4.1 -Encourage the use of site planning techniques, building orientation and building design that reduce energy use. To reduce energy use, the proposed Specific Plan will utilize energy saving techniques such as orienting buildings properly (i.e., north/south lot orientation), planting trees to take advantage of the sun, ensuring adequate roof overhangs, providing properly insulated walls, and providing simple heat storage systems such as dual-paned windows. 4.2 Require the use of energy efficient building materials to reduce energy use. Besides using the above techniques, the project development will also include utilization of energy efficient building materials for construction in order to reduce energy use. Goal 5: Conservation of open space areas for a balance of recreation, scenic enjoyment, and protection of natural resources and features. Discussion: The Specific Plan will conserve open space areas for a balance of recreation, scenic enjoyment and protection of natural resources and features by including clustered housing as part of its land use proposal, and by dedicating substantial areas of open space as FEBRUARY 2001 32 ~:~zoo~t~o'~arcoNstrrwc~voc OPEN SPACE / CONSERVATION ELEMENT 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.6 community park, mini parks, arroyo park, lake, lake park, paseo park, and extensive paseos and trail systerr~ PoHcies 5.1 Pursue the conservation of the western and southern ridgelines, the Santa Margarita River, slopes in the Sphere of Influence, and other important landforms and historic landscape features through the development review process and as a condition of project approval. This policy is not applicable because it is a City directed policy. 5.7 Identify significant viewsheds to proposed projects that may be preserved through the dedication of open space or the use of sensitive grading, site design and building techniques. This policy is not applicable because it is a City directed policy. Encourage the use of clustered development and other site planning techniques to maximize the preservation of open space. The Harveston Specific Plan includes clustered housing as part of its land use proposals, and it dedicates substantial areas of open space as community park, mini parks, arroyo park, lake, lake park, puseo park, and extensive paseos and trail system. Retain and improve the quality of landscaping in parkways, public slopes, rights-of-way, parks, civic facilities and other public open areas. The Design Guidelines Section (10.0) of the Specific Plan includes landscaping guidelines, which proposes landscaping of high standards and quality for the entire site. Coordinate with Homeowner's Association to maintain landscaping along slopes adjacent to public right-of-ways. The Harveston Specific Plan includes a maintenance plan (see Figure 12.2) which outlines the future maintenance responsibilities of slopes, roadways and public and private open space and recreational facilities. Landscape sections, which identify maintenance responsibilities, are also included in Section 12.0. Coordinatew'~th Homeowner's Assoc~aUons .... to mmntam landscaping' along slopes adjacent to public right-of-ways. The Harveston Specific Plan has dedicated parkland in conformance with the policies and standards of the Park and Recreation Master Plan of the City of Temecula. The Specific Plan included a maintenance plan, which addresses maintenance responsibilities adjacent to Public right-of-way. Require adequate open space in new development for both passive and active recreation. FEBRUARY 2001 33 OPEN SPACE / CONSERVATION ELEMENT 5.8 5.9 5.10 5.11 The Harveston Specific Plan has dedicated adequate amounts of open space for both active and passive recreation, based on the requirements of the TCSD. Require the vegetation of graded slopes concurrent with project development to minimize erosion and maintain the scenic character of the community. Vegetation of graded slopes will be required in order to minimize erosion and visual impacts concurrent with project development. Require the connection of open space and recreation areas to adjacent developments and publicly owned recreation areas where appropriate. The proposed trail system will connect to the public Community Park which, is part of the Specific Plan area and also to City wide trails and the existing Margarita Park located off- site. Study the feasibility of establishing a System of Transferable Development Credits, in conjunction with the County, to conserve open space or agricultural uses. This policy is not applicable because it is a City directed policy. Incorporate seismic hazard safety zones into valley-wide open space and park systems. This policy is not applicable because it is a City directed policy. 5.12 Encourage the use of native vegetation where re-vegetation and landscaping is to occur. The proposed plan will utilize native vegetation for the re-vegetation of the Arroyo Park. Goal 6: Preservation of significant historical and cultural resources. Discussion: This goal is not applicable because according to the Initial Study (and the City of Temecula General Plan), the site does not contain any sensitive archaeological resources. Although the study found no paleontological sites, project implementation could expose fossils through grading and other development activities. Implementation of EIR mitigation measures will ensure that exposure of cultural resources during grading/construction does not occur. Policies 6.1 Maintain an inventory of areas of sensitive archaeological/paleontological sensitivity in the planning area. According to the Initial Study (and the City of Temecula General Plan), the site does not contain any sensitive archaeological resources. The cultural resources study that was prepared concluded the same. Although paleontological sites were not found on the site, FEBRUARY 2001 34 OPEN SPACE / CONSERVATION ELEMENT 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.5 6.6 6.7 6.8 6.9 project implementation could expose fossils through grading and other development activities. Implementation of EIR mitigation measures will ensure that exposure of cultural resources during grading/construction does not occur. Require sites proposed for future development to be evaluated for archaeological resources in accordance with the procedures established in a Memorandum of Agreement with the Eastern Information Center at UC Riverside. A cultural resource study was performed evaluating for archaeological resources in conformance with the procedures established in a Memorandum of Agreement with the Easter Information Center at UC Riverside. Require sites proposed for future development that are identified in this Element as being of high or undetermined paleontological sensitivity to be evaluated by a qualified vertebrate paleontologist. Although the study found no paleontological sites, project implementation could expose fossils through grading and other .development activities. Implementation of E1R mitigation measures will ensure that exposure of cultural resources during grading/construction does not occur. Require sites containing significant archaeological or paleontological resources to either preserve identified sites or provide for the professional retrieval of artifacts prior to development. Implementation of the mitigation measures contained in the EIR will ensure that exposure of cultural resources during grading/conservation does not occur. Require that a certified archaeologist and/or paleontologist be present on site during grading, earth moving, or demolition of structures when these resources have been discovered during construction, and for sites designated or potentially designated as culturally significant in order to ensure these sites are preserved and protected. Native American observers may be requested to be present on site to observe and retrieve cultural resources when deemed necessary by a certified archaeologist or paleontologist and/or when mandated by state law. Although the cultural resources study performed did not identify any paleontological sites, project implementation could expose fossils through grading and other development activities. Implementation of mitigation measures will ensure that exposure of cultural resources during grading/construction does not occur. Not applicable because project is not in Old Town Specific Plan area. Not applicable because project is not in Old Town Specific Plan area. Not applicable because project is not in Old Town Specific Plan area. Not applicable because project does not contain historic structures on-site. FEBRUARY 2001 35 OPEN SPACE / CONSERVATION ELEMENT 6.10 Not applicable because project does not contain historic structures on-site. 6.11 Not applicable because project does not contain historic structures on-site. Goal 7: Protection of prime agricultural land from premature conversion to urbanized uses. This goal is not applicable because the Harveston Specific Plan site does not contain any prime agricultural land, which would be converted to urbanized uses. Goal 8: A trail system that serves both recreational and transportation needs. Discussion: The proposed Harveston Specific Plan trail system proposed connections to the City wide trail systerrr It also seeks to create a pedestrian friendly environment where extensive trails and bike lanes are provided for ease of access between different planning areas and land uses. Policies 8.1 Provide a City-wide recreation system that connects to the County's regional trail system through adoption of a Master Plan of Trails that provides for bicycling, equestrian, hiking and jogging trails and support facilities. This policy is not applicable because it is a City directed policy. 8.2 Negotiate land deeds as necessary to implement the City-wide trail system. This policy is not applicable because it is a City directed policy. 8.3 Require proposed development to provide trail connections to the cit~)-wide trail system as defined by the Parks and Recreation Master Plan and Master Plan of Trails. The proposed Harveston Specific Plan trail system proposes connections to the City-wide trail system, according to the Parks and Recreation Master Plan and Master Plan of Trails. 8.4 Require development plans to identify locations for an internal trails/sidewalk system that links land uses and provides convenient travel to transit facilities. The Specific Plan seeks to create a pedestrian friendly environment where extensive trails and bike lanes are provided for ease of access between different planning areas and land uses. FEBRUARY 2001 36 e..~ooo~m~oz~coNstsmvc~ooc OPEN SPACE / CONSERVATION ELEMENT Goal 9: Protection of dark skies from intrusive light sources, which may impact the Palomar Observatory Discussion: The Harveston Specific Plan is located within thirty (30) miles of Mount Palomar Observatory. In order to reduce light and glare impacts to the operations at the Observatory, outdoor lighting will be from low-pressure sodium lamps that are oriented and shielded to prevent direct illumination above the horizon plane passing through the luminare. Current supplies of electrical service have been strained due to recent de-regulation of the power industry. Recent shortages in generation capacity may require residents and business owners to pay higher costs for electricity or accept limitations required by the utility purveyors during periods of limited supply. The State of California is in the process of addressing this issue, as it is a Statewide and regional issue. Limitations wdl be resolved as new generating capacity is brought on line over the next few years. The project will be developed in stages and is anticipated to commence construction in early-2001. Policies 9.1 Coordinate with the County of Riverside and California Institute of Technology for Economic Research Purposes to ensure preservation procedures for dark skies are incorporated into the City development review process. This policy is not applicable because it is a City directed policy. Please see consistency analysis for Goal 9, above. 9.2 Participate in Palomar Observatory's dark sky conservation areas. The Harveston Specific Plan is located within thirty (30) miles of Mount Palomar Observatory. In order to reduce light and glare impacts to the operations at the Observatory, outdoor lighting will be from low pressure sodium lamps that are oriented and shielded to prevent direct illumination above the horizon plane passing through the luminare. FEBRUARY 2001 37 GROWTH MANAGEMENT ELEMENT GROWTH 1VIANAGEIVIENT /PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT Goal 1: Cooperate management of growth among local governments within Riverside County. Discussion: This goal is not applicable because it is a City directed goal. However, the Harveston Specific Plan provides ample amounts of open space for the enjoyment of the future residents of the Harveston community as well as the residents of neighboring development and the Ci0, in general. Also, the infrastructure standards have been prepared in coordination with the adjacent jurisdiction and property owners to help ensure compatibility. The plan does create unique development standards that will maintain the quality of life and the integrity of the proposed development. PoHci~ 1.1 Continue to participate with the Western Riverside Council of Governments in the preparation of plans and programs addressing regional issues, including the Growth Management Strategy, Comprehensive Transportation Plan, Water Resources SWategy, and School Facilities Plan. This policy is not applicable because it is a City directed policy. 1.2 Strive to achieve the policies of WRCOG's Growth Management Strategy as appropriate through Temecula's Growth Management Program. This policy is not applicable because it is a City directed policy. 1.3 Assist in the establishment of cooperative efforts to implement development standards, which address quality of life issues. The Harveston Specific Plan contains extensive development standards, which strive to enforce a set of standards that would enhance and maintain a high quality of life for the community residents. 1.4 Strive to achieve economic growth and prosperity, while preserving natural beauty and the social quality of life in southwestern Riverside County. The Harveston Specific Plan has been prepared in conformance with the City of Temecula General Plan, and as such the goal of the Specific Plan is to introduce a development within the southwestern Riverside County that will achieve economic growth (£e., 112.4 acres of Service Commercial proposed) and yet preserve the beauty and quality of life in the area (i.e., extensive park and open space program proposed). 1.5 Encourage or assist in the establishment of natural reserves for the preservation of sensitive and endangered species, and to provide open space for residents. The Harveston Specific Plan provides ample amounts of open space for the enjoyment of the future residents of the Harveston community as well as the residents of neighboring developments and the City in general. The plan also includes a lO. 5-acre arroyo park, which will create a riparian habitat and preserve the defined U.S. waters creek bed in its natural state. The project site does not contain any sensitive or endangered species. FEBRUARY 2001 38 GROWTH MANAGEMENT ELEMENT 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 1.10 Seek to establish minimum compatibility with adjacent jurisdictions for basic development standards related to infrastructure and engineering, while preserving unique zoning and design standards. The Harveston Specific Plan infrastructure standards have been prepared in coordination with the adjacent jurisdiction and property owners to help ensure compatibility. The plan does create unique development standards that will maintain the quality of life and the integrity of the proposed development. Establish a joint planning process with the County to plan for furore development in the Sphere of Influence. This policy is not applicable because it is a City directed policy. Establish a joint review process with the County to ensure that proposed projects in the Sphere of Influence can be adequately served in the future by the City. This policy is not applicable because it is a City directed policy. Guide the timing and provision of facilities and services to support development and protect or enhance the quality of life. The Harveston Specific Plan proposes a phasing plan of development (see Figure 12.1, Phasing Plan, in Section 12.0, Implementation and Administration) that would ensure provision of facilities and services to support development as the project buildout proceeds. Require development to pay its fair share of the costs of facilities and services required to serve the resulting level of growth. The Harveston Specific Plan will be conditioned to pay Development Impact Fees and other required fees to mitigate its share of impacts on facilities and services that will serve the future growth. 1.11 Pursue joint efforts to achieve fiscal stability for both City and County government. 1.12 This policy is not applicable because it is a City directed policy. Consider options to jointly contract with other jurisdictions for the provisions of services or facilities to achieve economies of scale. This policy is not applicable because it is a City directed policy. FEBRUARY 2001 39 v,eooo~m~o~cosstsravczooc GROWTH MANAGEMENT ELEMENT Goal 2: Orderly and efficient patterns of growth within Temecula that enhance the quality of life for residents. Discussion: In an effort to enhance the quality of life for residents, the Harveston Specific Plan includes a Mixed Use Village Center that proposes a mix of uses with an efficient circulation and open space system. The proposed project also includes a variety of housing types in terms of cost, density and design to meet the needs of different segments of the population. In nddition, it includes commercial uses, which would create jobs locally and regionally, therefore, maintaining a balance between jobs and housing opportunities. Policies 2.1 Prepare and implement a Growth Management Program for Temecula. This policy is not applicable because it is a City directed policy. 2.2 Ensure that phasing of public facilities and services occur in such a way that new development is adequately supported as it develops. The Harveston Specific Plan proposes a phasing plan of development (see Figure 12.1, Phasing Plan, Section 12.0, Implementation and Administration) that would ensure provision of facilities and services to support development as the project buiidout proceeds. 2.3 Establish and maintain level of service standards in order to document adequacy requirements. The Harveston Specific Plan EiR provides an analysis of the project's impacts on levels of service and proposes mitigation to ensure adequate level of service standards are maintained with project implementation. 2.4 Encourage development of Mixed Use Village Centers, as defined in the Land Use and Community Design Elements to reduce public service costs and environmental impacts through compatible land use relationships, and efficient circulation and open space systems. The Harveston Specific Plan includes a Mixed Use Village Center that proposes a mix of uses with an efficient circulation and open space system. 2.5 Encourage new development that helps to create and maintain a balance between jobs and housing oppommities. The proposed project includes a variety of housing types in terms of cost, density and design to meet the needs of different segments of the population. In addition, it includes commercial uses, which would create jobs locally and regionally, therefore, maintaining a balance between jobs and housing opportunities. 2.6 Establish priority growth areas within the City and Sphere of Influence where near-term urbanization will be encouraged. FEBRUARY 2001 40 ~:~ooo~v~6oz~coNstrr~czvoc GROWTH MANAGEMENT ELEMENT 2.7 2.8 This policy is not applicable because it is a City directed policy. Discourage the use of assessment districts that promote urban sprawl and premature urbanization in rural and agricultural areas. This policy is not applicable because it is a City directed policy. Coordinate the Growth Management Program with the Congestion Management Program as necessary. This policy is not applicable because it is a City directed policy. Goal 3: Effective and cost efficient sheriff, fire and emergency medial service within the City. Discussion: The Harveston Specific Plan EIR providesan analysts of the project s tmpacts on poltce and fire' ' ' ' ' protection levels of service and proposes mitigation to ensure adequate level of service standards is maintained with project implementation. Policies 3.1 Strive to provide a minimum of one full-time officer per 1,000 residents for police protection services. The Harveston Specific Plan EIR provides an analysis of the project's impacts on police protection levels of service and proposes mitigation to ensure adequate level of service standards are maintained with project implementation. 3.2 Strive to provide a minimum response time of between 7 and 10 minutes of an alarm for 90 percent of all fires, in accordance with the Riverside County Fire Protection and Emergency Master Plan. The Harveston Specific Plan EIR provides an analysis of the project's impacts on fire protection levels of service and proposes mitigation to ensure adequate level of service standards are maintained with project implementation. 3.3 Require new development to address fire and police protection in a proactive and preventative way through street design, orientation of entryways, siting of structures, landscaping, lighting and other security features. The Harveston Specific Plan design guidelines and standards (see Section 10.0, Design Guidelines) provide for features listed above that would create a safe and secure environment for the residents. Additionally, the Specific Plan and EIR will be reviewed by police and fire so additional recommendation can be incorporated if necessary. 3.4 Coordinate with the County of Riverside in the location and phasing of new sheriff facilities or fn-e stations to ensure that adequate service levels are maintained. FEBRUARY 2001 41 GR 0 WTH MANAGEMENT ELEMENT 3.5 3.6 3.7 This policy is not applicable because it is a City directed policy. Promote the establishment of Neighborhood Watch Programs in conjunction with the Sheriff's Department to increase the surveillance of neighborhoods. This policy is not applicable because it is a City directed policy. Consider the provision of police services by the City if it is more cost effective than contracting with the County of Riverside. This policy is not applicable because it is a City directed policy. Promote community awareness regarding drag use and gangs through the Police Department, Community Service Department, and public service organizations. This policy is not applicable because it is a City directed policy. Goal 4: A quality school system that contains adequate facilities and funding to educate the youth of Temecula. Discussion: The Temecula Valley Unified School District has been actively involved in the Harveston Specific Plan process, and a 12.0-acre site has been designated for an elementary school in response to the District's request. The School District will be made aware of future legislative land use policy decisions. The~e will be a need to expand school facilities at all levels to accommodate students from the proposed project. The District anticipates funding the school facilities for the proposed project from the fees collected through an existing school agreement, with half of the estimate being funded by the State, so long as those funds are available. Policies 4.1 Provide information to the Temecula Valley Unified School district, when considering General Plan amendments, specific plans, zone changes, or other legislative land use policy decisions, to support the School district in providing adequate school facilities for students for new development to the extent permitted by law. The Temecula Valley Unified School District has been actively involved in the Harveston Specific Plan process, and a I2.0-acre site has been designated for an elementary school in response to the District's request. The School District will be made aware of future legislative land use policy decisions. 4.2 Promote and encourage the phasing of project development so that the School district may plan, finance, and construct school facilities intended to serve the development. The proposed project applicant is having continual discussions with the School District regarding the phasing of the development plan in relation to the timing of the school site development. FEBRUARY 2001 42 ~:uooo~s~6oe~pcos~rr~czvoc GRO WTH MANAGEMENT ELEMENT 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6 Review proposed legislative land use decisions in the context of the adequacy of present and future facilities as permitted by law. The Harveston Specific Plan has been prepared based on the City of Temecula General Plan, and as such adheres to all the requirements of the City and takes into account adequacy of present and future facilities in making land use proposals. Provide safe access for school children walking, bicycling, or driving to and from school sites through coordination between the school disffict, and City departments of Planning, Public Works, and Engineering. The proposed project provides for an extensive system of trails, paseos, and bike lanes. These pedestrian/bicycle circulation systems have been designed through coordination with the City and School District and are consistent with the guidelines and requirements of the City of Temecula. Pursue the establishment of a wade school, junior college or 4-year college in Temecula that offers an emphasis in the education required by the engineering, biotechnical and biomedical indusffies located in Temecula. This policy is not applicable because it is a City directed policy. Plan for the joint use of school/municipal facilities wherever feasible and desirable, including: the joint use of school grounds, buildings, City parks, multi-purpose buildings, and recreation facilities. This policy is not applicable because it is a City directed policy. Goal 5: Public and Quasi-public facilities and services which provide for the social, cultural, civic, religious, and recreational needs of the community. Discussion: The Harveston Specific Plan provides areas (i.e., community park, village green, lake park, club house facility and school) where citizens would come together and participate in community programs. Child care facilities are permitted uses within the Mixed Use Village Center and High-Density Residential areas of the Specific Plan area. Senior citizens centers are permitted uses within the Mixed Use Village Center of the Specific Plan area. Religious institutions and other quasi-public uses are permitted and encouraged within the Mixed Use Overlay Zone. The proposed project encourages promoting such use for the benefit of ail the community. Policies 5.1 Acquire a civic center site and construct permanent City Hall facilities when feasible. This policy is not applicable because it is a City directed policy FEBRUARY 2001 43 r:xzoo~m~o~PcoNsrsr~cr.~oc GROWTH MANAGEMENT ELEMENT 5.2 Continue to encourage citizens to participate in community programs and volunteer for public service positions. The Harveston Specific Plan provides areas (i.e., community park, club house facility and school) where citizens would come together and participate in community programs. The proposed project encourages promoting such activities for the benefit of all the community. 5.3 Evaluate the feasibility of providing child care facilities in connection with employment- generating uses. Child care facilities are permitted uses within the Mixed Use Village Center and High Density Residential areas of the Specific Plan area. The proposed project encourages promoting such use for the benefit of all the community. 5.4 Encourage the development of a senior citizens center(s). Senior citizens centers are permitted uses within the Mixed Use Village Center of the Specific Plan area. The proposed project encourages promoting such use for the benefit of all the community. 5.5 Encourage the provision of cultural facilities within the community, including: art museums, theaters, a performing arts center, special exhibitions, an outdoor amphitheater, and Indian Cultural Interpretive Center. The proposed Specific Plan includes an array of uses including, outdoor amphitheater, art displays, outdoor exhibition areas, and more. Such uses are permitted and encouraged within this zone. 5.6 Encourage the provision of special recreation facilities such as a stadium, a zoo, and an amusement park. This policy is not applicable because the proposed Harveston Specific Plan does not propose a stadium, a zoo, and an amusement park. 5.7 Encourage the sharing or combining of public facilities for educational, cultural, and recreational purposes to more efficiently utilize public spaces and to provide viable community gathering Multi-purpose facilities, which confirm the above listed uses are permitted and encouraged within the Mixed Use Overlay Zone. 5.8 Encourage the availability of sites for religious institutions and other quasi-public uses in the City. Religious institutions and other quasi-public uses are permitted and encouraged within the Mixed Use Overlay Zone. 5.9 Cooperate with Riverside County to provide for library facilities and services that are consistent with community needs. FEBRUARY 2001 44 *:~ooo~m6oz~rcons~sr~nc~ooc GROWTH MANAGEMENT ELEMENT 5.10 This policy is not applicable because it is a City directed policy. Continue to assist non-profit community organizations in terms of financial and other forms of support to the extent feasible. This policy is not applicable because it is a City directed policy. Goal 6: A water and wastewater infrastructure development in the Study Area. system that supports existing and future Discussion: The proposed waster and wastewater plans for Harveston Specific Plan area will support future development in the area~ The proposed Har~eston Specific Plan area is located within the Rancho California Water District water service arec~ The proposed water plan consists of 12- inch and 16-inch backbone pipelines for domestic and fire service to the proposed commercial, residential, and parkland uses. The wastewater flows are proposed to be treated at the Santa Rosa Water Reclamation Plant, which is owned and operated by the RCWD. Sewer from the proposed project area will be directed to the Eastern Municipal Water District sewer system along Santa Gertrudis Creek at two locations. Policies 6.1 Require landowners to demonstrate that an available water supply and sewer treatment capacity exists or will be provided to serve proposed development, prior to issuance of building permits. Section 5.0, Infrastructure Plan, of the Specific Plan requires that future development provide assurance for provision of adequate water supply and sewer treatment capacity prior to issuance of building permits. 6.2 Require landowners, prior to issuance of building permits, to demonstrate that adequate wastewater capacity exists to accommodate the proposed development. 6.3 Section 5.0, Infrastructure Plan, of the Specific Plan requires that future development provide assurance for provision of adequate wastewater capacity prior to issuance of building permits. Coordinate with the water and wastewater districts when considering General Plan amendments, annexations, or development agreements; in order to assist the disu-icts in planning for adequate capacity to accommodate future growth. 6.4 The Harveston Specific Plan water and wastewater plans have been prepared in coordination with the appropriate districts. The districts were also contacted for input during the EIR process. Coordinate with the wastewater district to make reclaimed water available for irrigation purposes in the City. FEBRUARY 2001 45 r:u~oz~pcoNs~srr~c~voc GROWTH MANAGEMENT ELEMENT 6.5 6.6 The irrigation system will be designed to conform to the State's Water Conservation Assembly Bill 325 and City of Temecula Water Conservation Ordinances in effect. Additionally, the project will utilized reclaimed water, as available, for irrigation. Encourage the preparation of a long-term water management program by the District, and assist the District where appropriate. The District has been contacted for information and requirements during preparation of the utility plan for the Harveston Specific Plan. The District was also contacted for input during the EIR process. Require all new construction of water and sewer infrastructure to be consistent with utility master plans and to implement the policies of the General Plan. The Harveston Specific Plan Section 5.0, Infrastructure Plan, requires all new construction of water and sewer infrastructure be consistent with the utility master plans and policies of the General Plan. All water and sewer lines will be designed per EMWD and/or RCWD District requirements. Goal 7: An effective, safe and environmentally compatible flood control system. Discussion: Drainage and flood control facilities and improvements will be provided in accordance with the City of Temecula and the Riverside County Flood Control District requirements. The proposed drainage plan utilizes the project streets and storm drains to carry storm water to the existing natural drainage courses and to the drainage facilities under the LIS freeway. A storm drain system is proposed to carry storm water that exceeds surface street capacity. Policies 7.1 Work with the Riverside County Flood Control District and other agencies involved in the Murrieta Creek flood control improvements to implement a flood control solution that maximizes the retention of natural resources and the provision of recreation opportunities along the creek. This policy is not applicable because it is a City directed policy. 7.2 Prepare a City of Temecula Master Drainage Plan, which incorporates the Murrieta Creek Area Drainage Plan and additional planning efforts into one document. This policy is not applicable because it is a City directed policy. 7.3 Develop master drainage plans, when appropriate, for the Sphere of Influence, in conjunction with the Flood Control District. This policy is not applicable because it is a City directed policy. FEBRUARY 2001 46 GROWTH MANAGEMENT ELEMENT Goal 8: A solid waste management system that provides for the safe and efficient collection, trannportafion, recovery and disposal of solid wastes. Discussion: The solid waste produced within the development area will be safely carried to the disposing facilities. Policies 8.1 Coordinate with the County of Riverside to provide and expand service for the collection, storage, transportation, recovery, and disposal of solid waste to meet the needs of the City. The proposed project will comply with the City of Temecula and County of Riverside requirements, and it will implement existing collection, storage, transportation, recovery and disposal of solid waste. 8.2 Provide for the collection and disposal of household hazardous waste through the adoption of a Household Hazardous Waste Element. 8.3 This policy is not applicable because it is a City directed policy. Provide for solid waste reduction and recycling within the City through the adoption of a Source Reduction and Recycling Element. This policy is not applicable because it is a City directed policy. Goal 9: Adequate alectrical, natural gas, and telecommunication systems to meet the demand of new and existing development. Discussion: Electrical service is currently provided in the area by Southern California Edison Company (SCE). Adequate electric power supply can be provided. Natural gas service is currently provided by Southern California Gas Company. SCG indicates that gas service could be provided to the Specific Plan area in accordance with the Company's policies and extension rules on file with the California Public Utilities Commission at the time contractual arrangements are made. Policies 9.1 Coordinate with the responsible companies to provide for the continued maintenance, development, and expansion of electricity, natural gas, and telecommunications systems to serve residents and businesses. 9.2 As part of the Specific Plan EIR process, all utilities companies responsible for providing services to the new development were contacted to inquired about the level of service availability and additional requirements. Pursue the undergrounding of utilities along arterial roads, where feasible. The Harveston Specific Plan requires all new utility lines be undergrounded, in conformance with the requirements of the City of Temecula. ! FEBRUARY 2001 47 PUBLIC SAFETY ELEMENT PUBLIC SAFETY ELEMENT Goal 1: Protection from natural hazards associated with geologic instability, seismic events, and flooding. Discussion: To protect from natural hazards associated with geologic instability, seismic events, and flooding, the Harveston Specific Plan EIR includes a geotechnical investigation that evaluates soils and geologic conditions to determine stability. Also, the Specific Plan and the EIR require that all new development onsite comply with the most recent Uniform Building Code seismic design standards. Policies 1.! Require review of soil and geologic conditions to determine stability prior to project approval. In areas that may have significant geologic constraints, require analysis by a Registered Geotechnical Engineer. 1.2 The Harveston Specific Plan EIR includes a geotechnical investigation prepared by a registered geotechnical engineer that evaluates soils and geologic conditions to determine stability. Geotechnical recommendations and mitigation measures will be incorporated as necessary. Require mitigation of potential adverse impacts of geologic and seismic hazards, including ground surface rupture and liquefaction, at the project level. Mitigation measures are proposed and will be enforced at the project level for all identified potential geologic and seismic hazard impacts. 1.3 Monitor hazardous buildings in Old Town and work with property owners to remediate these buildings to improve structural integrity. This policy is not applicable because the Harveston Specific Plan is not located within the Old Town, and this is a City directed policy. 1.4 Require all new development to comply with the most recent Uniform Building Code seismic design standards. The proposed Harveston Specific Plan and the EIR will require that all new development onsite comply with the most recent Uniform Building Code seismic design standards. 1.5 Monitor the potential for seismic events and other geologic activity with the County of Riverside and California Division of Mines and Geology. This policy is not applicable because it is a City directed policy. Additionally, the Specific Plan and the EIR require that all new development onsite comply with the most recent Uniform Building Code seismic design standards. FEBRUARY 2001 48 PUBLIC SAFETY ELEMENT 1.6 Establish development management techniques to lessen the potential for erosion and landslides. Prior to initial grading, a soils report and geotechnical study will be performed that further analyze onsite soil conditions and slope stability and include appropriate measures to control erosion and landslide (see Sections 8.0, Grading Plan and 10.0, Design Guidelines). 1.7 Prohibit development in the floodway portion of the 100-year floodplain. 1.8 1.9 This policy is not applicable because the project site is not located within the lO0-year floodplain. Encourage only compatible uses within the 100-year floodplain. This policy is not applicable because the project site is not located within the lO0-year floodplain. Minimize the intrusion into and alteration of the lO0-year floodplain. This policy is not applicable because the project site is not located within the lO0-year floodplain. Goal 2: Protection of the public and environmental resources from exposure to hazardous materials and waste. Discussion: Based on the results of a Phase I analysis for the site, there are no potential risks associated with hazardous materials. Policies 2.1 Minimize the risks associated with hazardous materials through careful land use planning. The Harveston Specific Plan provides a comprehensive development plan of all land within the Specific Plan area. Land use determination is based on the best and most appropriate use for the land and situatiorr Based on the results of a Phase I analysis for the site, there are no potential risks associated with hazardous materials. Goal 3: A safe and secure community, free from the threat of personal injury and loss of property. Discussion: To build a safe and secure community free from the threat of personal injury and loss of property, the Harveston Specific Plan incorporates defensible space into site plan and building design. The proposed project also provides secondary access points in conformance with the City standards to ensure timely emergency service response. Policies 3.1 Ensure adequate facilities and police and fire service personnel are provided in the City. This policy is not applicable because it is a City directed policy. FEBRUARY 2001 49 ~:eooo~s~oz~coNstsresczvoc PUBLIC SAFETY ELEMENT 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 Continue to work with the community in operating Neighborhood Watch program~ that promote mutual assistance and crime prevention activities among residents. This policy is not applicable because it is a City directed policy. Reduce the risk of wildland fire through imposition of site-specific development standards during project review. This policy is not applicable because it is a City directed policy. Require new development to incorporate defensible space into site plan and building design. The Harveston Specific Plan incorporates defensible space into site plan and building design (see Section 10.0, Design Guidelines). Require all residential development with 35 or more dwelling units to provide secondary access that meets all City standards to ensure timely emergency service response. The proposed project does provide secondary access points in conformance with the City standards to ensure timely emergency service response. Goal 4: PoHcies 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 An effective response of emergency services following a disaster. This goal is not applicable because it is a City directed goal. Provide for and maintain a coordinated emergency service response to reduce community risks and property damage in the event of a disaster. This policy is not applicable because it is a City directed policy. Coordinate emergency response planning with Riverside County and the Federal Emergency Management Agency. This policy is not applicable because it is a City directed policy. Encourage community-wide emergency preparedness among City residents and the business community. This policy is not applicable because it is a City directed policy. Regulate location of critical facilities to ensure their continued functioning following a disaster. This policy is not applicable because it is a City directed policy. Establish and maintain an emergency operations center (EOC) for emergency and disaster situations in a safe and secure location. This policy is not applicable because it is a City directed poIicy. FEBRUARY 2001 50 NOISE ELEMENT NOISE ELEMENT Goal 1: Land Use planning that provides for the separation of significant noise generators from sensitive receptor areas. Discussion: The design of the Harveston land use plan has taken into account noise factors and has sought to maintain a balance where no significant noise impact would result. There are no significant noise generators incb,decl within the Harveston Specific Plan area The noise emanating from construction activities is considered temporary, however the EIR provides mitigation measures to mitigate this impact. Policies 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 Discourage noise sensitive land uses in noisy exterior environments unless measures can be implemented to reduce exterior and interior noise to acceptable levels. Alternatively, encourage less sensitive uses in areas adjacent to major noise generators but require appropriate interior working environments. The design of the Harveston land use plan has taken into account noise factors and has sought to maintain a balance where no significant noise impact would result. The EIR provides a detailed impact analysis and mitigation measures, as necessary. Limit the hours of construction activity in residential areas in order to reduce the intrusion of noise in the early morning and late evening hours, and on weekends and holidays. As part of the Harveston Specific Plan EIR, a noise study was conducted to analyze potential noise impacts and introduce mitigation measures, including limitations on hours of construction. Incorporate noise standards in the Development Code to ensure that residents are not exposed to excessive levels of noise from stationary sources. As part of the Harveston Specific Plan E1R, a noise study was conducted to analyze potential noise impacts and introduce mitigation measures. The Development Code includes standards that ensure the residents are not exposed to excessive noise levels from stationary sources. Require proposed industrial or commercial projects located near existing or planned residential areas to demonstrate that the project when constructed, will comply with the City noise requirements. The Harveston Specific design guidelines and development standards require the Service Commercial uses comply with the City noise requirements. Work with the school district to relocate the school bus maintenance yard to an area that will not adversely impact sensitive receptors. This policy is not applicable because it is a City directed policy. FEBRUARY 2001 51 ~:~ooo~s~zv~coNs~rravcrvoc NOISE ELEMENT 1.7 1.8 1.6 Ensure that current noise hazard areas in the City are identified, quantified, and mapped in a form that is available to decisionmakers. This policy is not applicable because it is a City directed policy. Utilize the information from the noise contour map in the General Plan in the development review process to ensure that noise sensitive land uses are not located near major stationary noise sources. Development of the land use plan of the proposed project utilized information from the noise contour map to ensure that the noise sensitive land uses are not located near major stationary noise sources. Additionally, as part of the Harveston Specific Plan EIR, a noise study was conducted to analyze potential noise impacts and introduce mitigation measures, including noise standards in the Development Code. Minimize noise conflicts between land uses and the circulation network. The land use relationships of the Harveston Specific Plan area have been arranged in a manner to minimize any potential noise conflicts between land uses and the circulation network. Additionally, as part of the Harveston Specific Plan EIR, a noise study was conducted to analyze potential noise impacts and introduce mitigation measures, including noise standards in the Development Code. Existing light industrial uses will located next to residential uses in Planning Area No. 1. It should be noted that this will not present any conflict, as the side of the existing industrial building will be located at the rear of the residential uses. In addition, an additional landscape buffer has been included at the rear of these parcels. Goal 2: The control of noise between land uses. Discussion: As part of the Harveston Specific Plan E1R, a noise study was conducted to analyze potential noise impacts and to introduce mitigation measures, including noise standards in the Development Code. PoHcies 2.1 Limit the maximum permitted noise levels which cross property lines and impact adjacent land uses. As part of the Harveston Specific Plan E/R, a noise study was conducted to analyze potential noise impacts and introduce mitigation measures, including noise standards in the Development Code. FEBRUARY 2001 52 P:~O~O~N~OZ~CONStSmVC~mC NOISE ELEMENT Goal 3: Consider noise issues in the pl~nnlng process. Discussion: The Harveston Noise Study evaluates potential noise conflicts from project buildout and based upon identified noise impacts proposes the use of site design and building design techniques, including the use of landscape setbacks or berms, building orientation, and buffering of noise sensitive areas, as a means to minimize noise impacts and/or additional mitigation measures as appropriate. PoHcies 3.1 Establish standards for acceptable limits of noise for various lands use in the City. This policy is not applicable because it is a City directed policy. 3.2 Work with the County of Riverside and the City of Murrieta in minimizing or avoiding conflicts between land use and noise prior to project approvals. This policy is not applicable because it is a City directed policy. 3.3 Encourage the use of site design and building design techniques, including the use of landscape setbacks or berms, building orientation, and buffering of noise sensitive areas, as a means to minimize noise impacts. The Harveston Noise Study evaluates potential noise conflicts from project buildout and based upon identified noise impacts proposes the above techniques and/or additional mitigation measures as appropriate. 3.4 Evaluate potential noise conflicts for individual sites and projects. The Noise Study evaluates potential noise conflicts, and based upon identified noise impacts proposes mitigation measures as appropriate. 3.5 Require mitigation of all significant noise impacts as a condition of project approval. The Noise proposes mitigation measures, as necessary, which will be enforced as conditions of project approval. Goal 4: Minimize noise impacts from transportation noise sources. Discussion: To minimize noise impacts from transportation noise sources the Noise Study in the EIR evaluates the potential noise impacts and proposes mitigation measures as appropriate. Additionally, the proposed Specific Plan has been coordinating efforts with Caltrans and will comply with the requirements set forth by that agency. FEBRUARY 2001 53 NOISE ELEMENT Po~ci~ 4.1 Develop a program to construct barriers to mitigate sound levels where necessary or where feasible to ensure the peace and quiet of the community. The Noise Study as part of the EIR, evaluates the potential noise impacts and proposes mitigation measures as appropriate, in order to ensure peace and quiet within the community. 4.2 Ensure the effective enforcement of City, State, and Federal noise standards by all appropriate City Divisions. This policy is not applicable because it is a City directed policy. 4.3 Enforce the speed limit on arterials and local roads to reduce noise impacts from vehicles, particularly in residential areas. This policy is not applicable because it is a City directed policy. 4.4 Coordinate with Caltrans to ensure the inclusion of noise mitigation measures in the design of new highways projects or improvements to existing facilities including, interchange improvements along 1-15, widening of SR 79 South, SR 79 North and the proposed Date Street/I- 15 interchange. The proposed Specific Plan has been coordinating efforts with Caltrans and will comply with the requirements set forth by that agency 4.5 The City shall participate in the planning and impact assessment activities of the Airport Land Use Commission and other regional or state agencies relative to any proposed expansion of the airport or change in flight patterns. This policy is not applicable because it is a City directed policy. FEBRUARY 2001 54 ~,:,2ooass~:,~a~cosm'renc~voc COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT Am QUALITY ELEMENT Goal 1: Improvement of air quality through proper land use planning in Temecula. Discussion: The Harveston Specific Plan contains a balanced mix of residential and employment opportunities, therefore, reducing vehicle miles traveled. The circulation plan and the land use plan have been coordinated to minimize land use conflicts and prevent potential impacts. As part of the EIR document, an Air Quality analysis was conducted to evaluate the air pollutant emissions and introduce mitigation measures, which will be enforced in order to reduce air pollution. PoHci~ 1.1 Encourage new development that provides employment opportunities for residents of Temecula to improve the balance of jobs relative to housing. The Harveston Specific Plan contains a balanced mix of residential and employment opportunities, therefore, reducing vehicle miles traveled. The Specific Plan area contains a service commercial area, and a Mixed Use Village Center, which also includes commercial and retail. 1.2 Encourage in-fill development near activity centers and along transportation corridors. This policy is not applicable because it is a City directed policy. 1.3 Minimize land use conflicts between emission sources and sensitive receptors. The circulation plan and the land use plan have been coordinated to minimized this conflict and prevent potential impacts. 1.4 Reduce air pollutant emissions by mitigating air quality impacts associated with development projects to the greatest extent feasible. As part of the EIR document, an Air Quality analysis was conducted to evaluate the air pollutant emissions and introduce mitigation measures, which will be enforced in order to reduce air pollution. Goal 2: Enhanced mobility to minimize air pollutant emissions. Discussion: The Harveston Specific Plan proposes a pedestrian-friendly environment where walking and biking are encouraged through provision of extensive walking trails/paseos and bike lanes that connect different planning areas and uses within the community. To have an efficient flow of traffic, the Specific Plan proposes a hierarchy of streets, in which arterials circumvent the FEBRUARY 2001 55 COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT community, collector roads proceed into the community, and internal neighborhood streets web throughout the neighborhoods. PoHcies 2.1 Implement transportation demand management techniques to reduce motor vehicle trips, including walking, bicycling, ridesharing, local transit, staggered work schedules and telecommunications. The Harveston Specific Plan proposes a pedestrian-friendly environment where walking and biking are encouraged through provision of extensive walking trails/paseos and bike lanes that connect different planning areas and uses within the community. 2.2 Maintain an orderly flow of traffic and improve mobility through the use of transportation systems management techniques. A Traffic and Circulation Analysis was prepared as part of the EIR, which analyzed the future traffic flow and proposed mitigations to improve the flow. Additionally, the Specific Plan proposes a hierarchy of streets, in which arterials circumvent the community, collector roads proceed into the community, and internal neighborhood streets web throughout the neighborhoods. This system allows an efficient flow of traffic. 2.3 Pursue development of a public transit system including local shuttle and bus routes, and bicycle and pedesffian trails that are linked to regional light rail. The Harveston Specific Plan will comply with the City of Temecula and the Riverside Transit Agency to facilitate provision of transit service. Coordination and correspondence with the Riverside Transit Agency was completed as part of the Harveston EIR preparation. All maps will be conditioned during the review stage to ensure compliance. 2.4 Promote alternatives to motorized transportation by establishing a convenient and efficient system of bicycle routes and pedestrian walkways. The proposed Specific Plan introduces a pedestrian and bicycle friendly environment where extensive systems of trails/paseos and bike lanes are provided for ease of access between different planning areas and uses. 2.5 Promote the use of alternative clean fueled vehicles for personal and business use. This policy is not applicable because it is a City directed policy. 2.6 Encourage programs that reduce local traffic congestion at peak hours and during special events. A Traffic and Circulation Analysis was prepared which analyzes circulation in the Specific Plan area and its potential impact on a larger area during peak hours. The analysis proposes mitigations to reduce potential congestion. FEBRUARY 2001 56 COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT Goal 3: Incorporate energy conservation practices and recycling to reduce emissions. Discussion: The Harveston Specific Plan requires future developments employ passive solar heating techniques in order to save energy consumption. Passive systems will include orienting buildings properly (Le., north/south lot orientation), planting trees to take advantage of the sun, ensuring adequate roof overhangs, properly insulating walls, and incorporating simple heat storage systems, including dual-paned windows. PoHcies 3.1 Encourage community-wide reductions in energy consumption through conservation. The Harveston Specific Plan encourages future developments employ passive solar heating techniques in order to save energy consumption. Passive systems will include orienting buildings properly (i.e., north/south lot orientation), planting trees to take advantage of the sun, ensuring adequate roof overhangs, properly insulating walls, and incorporating simple heat storage systems, including dual-paned windows. 3.2 Promote local recycling of wastes and the use of recycled materials. The Harveston Specific Plan will comply with City of Temecula curb--side recycling programs. Goal 4: Effective coordination of air quality improvement efforts in the Western Riverside area. This goal is not applicable because it is a City, regional, and state agency directed goal. policies 4.1 Coordinate planning efforts with other local, regional and state agencies, including WRCOG, SCAQMD and SCAG, in their efforts to improve regional air quality. This policy is not applicable because it is a City, regional, and state agency directed policy. 4.2 Encourage participation of local citizens, the business community and interested groups and individuals in air quality planning and implementation efforts. This policy is not applicable because it is a City, regional, and state agency directed policy. Promote programs, which educate the public about regional air quality issues. This policy is not applicable because it is a City, regional, and state agency directed policy. 4.3 FEBRUARY 2001 57 COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT Goal 1: Enhancement of the City's image related to its regional and natural setting and its tourist orientation, Discussion: The proposed Harveston Specific Plan project includes plans for a 13.8-acre Arroyo Park, which will recapture more naturalistic California landscape and provide a naturalistic setting for walking, hiking, and picnicking, therefore offering a different recreation experience for the residents of the community as well as the City. Additionally, the proposed project offers extensive systems of trails and open space, which will be connected to different areas within the development. Another feature of the project, .which would be attractive for visitors to the community is the lake connected to other parts of the community through trails. Policies 1.1 Promote the development of a comprehensive system of trails and open space areas that connect schools, public recreation areas, residential areas, and commercial centers. The Harveston Specific Plan has incorporated plans for a paseo/trail system that will connect public recreation area, schools, residential areas and commercial areas. 1.2 Promote the development of a comprehensive system of trails and open space areas that connect schools, public recreation areas, residential areas, and commercial centers. This policy is not applicable because the Harveston Specific Plan area is not located within the Old Town area. 1.3 Develop design standards to enhance the visual character of commercial centers that are located adjacent to 1-15. The Harveston Specific Plan includes extensive design guidelines (see Section 10.0) and development standards (see Section ILO) that will apply to the whole Specific Plan area (including the service commercial areas - adjacent to 1-15) and provide unifying elements to visually tie the community and create a distinct character. 1.4 Promote community identity by providing specially designed gateway signage at the primary entrances to the City. The Harveston Specific Plan proposes entry rnonumentation at the primary and secondary entrances to the community to promote an identity for the project area. (See Figures 10.2-10.5, Section 10.0, Design Guidelines). 1.5 Maintain and incorporate natural amenities such as: rock outcroppings, indigenous vegetation, streams and watercourses into development projects to protect the environment and provide natural landscaping, protect views, and to provide recreational opportunities in order to maintain the quality of life. FEBRUARY 2001 58 COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT The proposed project includes plans for a lO. 5-acre Arroyo Park, which will recapture more naturalistic California landscape and provide a naturalistic setting for walking, hiking, and picnicking, therefore offering residents a different recreation experience. Goal 2: Design excellence in site planning, architecture, landscape architecture and signage in new development and modifications to existing development. Discussion: The Harveston Specific Plan introduces consistent and unifying design guidelines that would apply throughout the community to tie different elements into a design theme that would reflect the image of the community. The Specific Plan includes flexible design standards for the commercial development that are compatible with standards for other uses in the community, yet create an identity for the commercial development. Additionally, the Harveston Specific Plan proposes entry manumentation at the primary and secondary entrances to the community to promote an identity for the project area. Policies 2.1 Establish and consistently apply design standards and guidelines for residential and non- residential development. The Harveston Specific Plan introduces consistent and unifying design guidelines (see Section 10.0) that would apply throughout the community to tie different elements into a design theme that would reflect the image of the community. 2.2 Promote a cohesive and integrated pattern of development for large undeveloped areas, by requiring the preparation of Specific Plans. This policy is not applicable because it is a City directed policy. 2.3 Provide development standards to ensure higher quality design that is well integrated with the infrastructure and cimulation systems. The Harveston Specific Plan as well as the Planning Area Development Standards (see Section 11.0) is compatible and well integrated with other elements in the Specific Plan document. 2.4 Formulate flexible design standards for commercial development that enhances the special identity and visual character of the commercial development. The Specific Plan includes flexible design standards for the commercial development that are compatible with standards for other uses in the community, yet create an identity for the commercial development. 2.5 Limit light/glare pollution through design standards for outdoor lighting and the use of low intensity lights. FEBRUARY 2001 59 ~:~ooo~m~coNst~vc~voc COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT 2.6 The Harveston Specific Plan is located within thirty (30) miles of Mount Palomar Observatory. In order to reduce any potential impacts from light and glare, outdoor lighting will be from low pressure sodium lamps that are oriented and shielded to prevent direct illumination above the horizontal plane passing through luminare. Enhance the individuality and special visual identity of commercial districts and unified streetscape plans. The proposed plan includes guidelines for different uses within the community and streetscape plans that seek to enhance the individuality and identity of each district and yet unify the whole community into a distinct design theme. Preservation and enhancement of the positive neighborhoods. qualifies of individual districts or Discussion: Although this goal is not applicable because it pertains to existing older communities, the Specific Plan seeks to create neighborhoods with distinct character, yet tying them with unifying architectural and landscape themes. The use of landscaping is an important element in design of the Harveston Specific Plan. Landscape features from passive turf areas to group shade arbors and thematic and buffer landscape treatments all play important roles in creating a visually interesting development and reduce conflicts between different land uses. The Mixed Use Village Center in the Specific Plan area creates a pedestrian friendly environment where City residents can enjoy amenities such as plazas, gardens, gathering places, benches, and much more to have a recreational as well as social experience. Policies 3.1 Improve the appearance of neighborhood areas and the "edge" between neighborhoods through, landscaping, location of open space buffers, and special landscape features. The Harveston Specific Plan provides for special landscaping techniques as buffers between different planning areas and uses. 3.2 Preserve the scale and character of residential development by creating appropriate transitions between lower density, rural areas, and higher density development. The different land uses within the Specific Plan are arranged in a manner that creates transitions between different densities and different uses. Special design elements and landscaping achieves this transition. 3.3 Encourage the use of creative landscape design to create visual interest and reduce conflicts between different land uses. The use of landscaping is an important element in design of the Harveston Specific Plan. Landscape features from passive turf areas to group shade arbors and thematic and buffer FEBRUARY 2001 60 COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT 3.4 landscape treatments all play important roles in creating a visually interesting development and reduce conflicts between different land uses. Improve the pedestrian orientation, convenience and safety of commercial centers through the provision of pedestrian amenities such as benches, plaza areas, information kiosks and other street furniture, and through careful site planning and architectural design. The Mixed Use Village Center in the Specific Plan area creates a pedestrian friendly environment where pedestrians can enjoy amenities such as plazas, gardens, gathering places, benches, and much mare to have a recreational ax well as social experience. Goal 4: A streetscape system that provides cohesiveness and enhances community image. Discussion: The sidewalks and paseos included in the proposed plan incorporate unique design features, landscaping, and amenities. Many of the proposed paseos will meander through the adjacent landscape; generous landscape parkways between roads and sidewalks create a positive image and provides identity for the community. Policies 4.1 Promote the development of a continuous sidewalk and ri'all system throughout the City. The Harveston Specific Plan includes an extensive system of trails/paseos, bike lanes, and sidewalks that circulate throughout the development and connect to city wide trail systems off- site. 4.2 4.3 Formulate a comprehensive streetscape program for the major streets in the City, including unified landscaping, lighting, paving patterns, and other public improvements. This policy is not applicable because it is a City directed policy. Encourage variety in the design of sidewalks and trails, with respect to alignment and surface materials, to provide a convenient and enjoyable experience for the users. 4.4 The sidewalks and paseos included in the proposed plan incorporate unique design features, landscaping, and amenities offering users a different recreational experience. Many of the proposed paseos will meander through the adjacent landscape. Establish a city-wide street tree and median/slope planting program. Section 10.0, Design Guidelines, of the Harveston Specific Plan requires that a detailed landscape program and guidelines for roadways and slopes be prepared by a qualified landscape architect, subject to review by City staff. The landscaping guidelines include a special street tree and median/slope planting prograr~ The City (TCSD) will maintain ali the landscaped medians and LDZ's adjacent to single family residential, on roadways with a 66-foot ROW of larger. The applicant or master developer will be responsible for maintenance of all slopes planting areas until such time as these operations are the responsibility of other parties. FEBRUARY 2001 61 COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT 4.5 4.6 4.7 4.8 Where feasible, require the provision of landscaped parkways between roads and sidewalks. The roadway sections contained in Section 10.0, Design Guidelines, of the Specific Plan depict generous landscaped parkways between roads and sidewalks. Arterial roads should be designed as landscaped parkways that serve as unifying urban design elements. The Design Guidelines (Section 10.0) of the Specific Plan include a unifying urban design theme for the arterial roads. Encourage the use of drought tolerant landscape materials that are easy to maintain and are approved by the City's Parks and Recreation Department. The plant material selection for common landscape areas for Harveston is presented in a plant palette that is broken down into different types of uses within the Specific Plan area (see Section 10.0, Design Guidelines). The plant material guidelines provide flexibility and diversity in plant material selection, while maintaining a limited palette in order to give greater unity and thematic identity to the community. The plant palette includes drought tolerant materials and will be subject to approval by the City's Community Services Department. Establish and enforce weed abatement programs on undeveloped properties and along major arterials. An effort to enforce weed abatement programs along major arterials will be part of the maintenance program for roadways identified in Section JO.O, Design Guidelines, of the Specific Plan. Goal 5: Protection of public views of significant natural features. Discussion: The Harveston Specific Plan will not impact public views of the surrounding significant natural features. The project site does not include any natural features that would be impacted by the development. Policies 5.1 Work with the County of Riverside to protect the surrounding hillside areas. This policy is not applicable because it is a City directed policy. 5.2 Promote the development of mm-outs on scenic roads. This policy is not applicable because it is a City directed policy. FEBRUARY 2001 62 e:~ooo~N~*o2xaecoss, sr~cz~oc COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT 5.3 Require the revegetation and maintenance of graded slope areas. The Harveston Specific Plan (see Section 8.0, Grading Plan and 9.0, Landscaping) requires the revegetation and maintenance of graded slope areas. Goal 6: Maintenance and enhancement of the City's public spaces and resources. 6.2 6.3 Discussion: The Harveston Specific Plan promotes public spaces within the development. In areas of high pedestrian activity (i.e., the Mixed Use Village Center) provisions for street furniture and shade trees are included. Outdoor sitting area and plazas are part of the Mixed Use Village Center. In addition, in paseos and passive recreation parks, trees and benches are provided for the convenience and comfort of the users. Policies 6.1 Provide for street furniture in areas with high pedestrian activity and provide for shade trees in shopping areas. The Design Guidelines of the Specific Plan provides detailed description of roadways, including street furniture and other elements. In areas of high pedestrian activity (i.e., the Mixed Use Village Center) provisions for street furniture and shade trees are included. In nddition, in paseos and passive recreation parks, trees and benches are provided for the convenience and comfort of the users. Establish improvement plans for ilae City's public spaces and include these plans in the Capital Improvement Program. This policy is not applicable because it is a City directed policy. Assure that operating and maintenance costs are adequately provided for public facilities. Section 12.0, Implementation and Administration, of the Specific Plan addresses costs of operating and maintaining public facilities. Additionally, Development Impact Fees, to be paid by the project, will provide for capital improvements. Goal 7: Comm~mity gathering areas, which provide for the social, civic, cultural and recreational needs of the eommqulty. Discussion: The Harveston Specific Plan proposes gathering areas and plazas within the commercial developments (Mixed Use Village Center) that will also accommodate social events. Additionally, the Village Green creates a public gathering place, which will encourage social interaction and community activities, such as concerts or farmers markets. Also, mini parks in FEBRUARY 2001 63 COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT PoHcies 7.1 7.2 7.5 7.6 addition to paseos and passive recreational park* and a clubhouse facility are provided throughout the development where residents will gather for social and recreational activities. 7.3 7.4 Encourage the development of public spaces and plazas within commercial developments that can accommodate cultural and social events and function as community gathering areas. The Harveston Specific Plan proposes gathering areas and plazas within the commercial developments (Mixed Use Village Center) that will accommodate social events. Additionally, the Village Green creates a public gathering place, which will encourage social interaction and community activities, such as concerts or farmers markets. Encourage the development of multi-purpose facilities within commercial developments that may be leased for a variety of public and private events. The Harveston Specific Plan proposes multi-purpose facilities within the commercial developments (Mixed Use Village Center) that will accommodate public and private events. The Village Club will include facilities that can be utilized for events such as weddings. Additionally, uses within the Mixed Use Village Center such as church can accommodate public and private events. Encourage the development of a range of uses within commercial developments that provide for day and evening activities. Day and evening activities are permitted and encouraged within the Mixed Use Village Center and Service Commercial areas. Encourage development of common arms and facilities within residential developments to provide gathering areas for social and recreational activities. Mini parks in addition to paseos and passive recreational parks and a clubhouse facility are provided throughout the development where residents will gather for social and recreational activities. Encourage the development of employee lunch areas within the industrial/business park facilities. Some industrial./business park uses are permitted within Planning Are No. 12 of the Specific Plan. While the Specific Plan does not expressly require employee lunch areas within the industrial/business park areas, the City's Development Code does. Section 12.1 of the Specific Plan states: "any development regulation and building requirement not addressed in the Specific Plan shall be subject to the City's adopted regulations." It is anticipated that these employee lunch areas will be provided if these uses are developed. Promote the provision of cultural facilities within the community including: art museums, theaters, performing art centers, outdoor amphitheaters, and special cultural exhibitions. The Harveston Specific Plan includes a Village Club where above activities are allowed and encouraged. Additionally, outdoor activities such as exhibitions, outdoor amphitheaters, and public gathering are also permitted in open space areas adjacent to the Mixed Use Village Center. FEBRUARY 2001 64 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT Goal 1: Development of a strong base of dean manufacturing activities which employs a skilled labor force and can be successfully integrated into Temecula's community character. Some clean manufacturing uses are allowed in the Planning Area No. 12 of the Specific Plan. This may contribute to the existing strong base of clean manufacturing activities which employs a skilled labor force. This type of development will also be held to the standards required of other clean manufacturing uses, thereby being successfully integrated into Temecula's community character. Goal 2: Diversification of the economic base to include a range of manufacturing, retail and service activities. Discussion: The Harveston Specific Plan has been designed taking into account the City of Temecula's socio- economic patterns, and therefore, will adapt to the City's both short and long-term economic conditions. The proposed project includes plans for retail, service commercial, and other activities that provides a broad selection of high-quality goods and services for residents, workers and tourists. Policies 2.1 Provide for industrial land uses, which facilitate a variety of user types, including manufacturing space, storage and distribution, back-office space, and research and development space. This policy is not applicable because the Harveston Specific Plan does not include industrial and manufacturing uses. 2.2 Plan for land use and development patterns that allow succession of use and will adapt to Temecula's economic conditions. The Harveston Specific Plan has been designed taking into account the City of Temecula's socio- economic patterns, and therefore, will adapt to the City's both short and long-term economic conditions. 2.3 Promote development of properly located and well designed commercial centers to meet the diverse service needs of the City. The Harveston Specific Plan includes plans for well designed commercial centers that will meet the many service needs of the City. The appropriate location of the Service Commercial supports the above policy. 2.4 Promote retail and other support activities that provide a broader selection of high-quality goods and services for residents, workers and tourists, including apparel, general merchandise, home furnishings and appliances. FEBRUARY 2001 65 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT 2.5 The proposed project includes plans for retail and other activities that provides a broad selection of high-quality goods and services for residents, workers and tourists. Use redevelopment powers and opportunities to enhance development opportunities. This policy is not applicable because it is a City directed policy. Goal 3: Maiptain an economic base to provide a sound fiscal foundation for the City as well as quality comml~lity facilities and high service levels. Discussion: The Harveston Specific Plan proposes a broad array of uses ranging from neighborhood retail commercial to service commercial, residential, recreational and school. The uses are phased in a manner to balance revenue generating land uses with uses that have negative fiscal impacts. The commercial activities provided for within the Specific Plan area will greatly help in providing fiscal balance, local tax, and employment opportunities. PoHcies 3.1 Encourage a pattern of development that balances revenue generating land uses in phase with other uses that have negative fiscal impacts. 3.2 The Harveston Specific Plan proposes a broad array of uses ranging from neighborhood retail commercial to service commercial, residential, recreational and school. The uses are phased in a manner to balance revenue generating land uses with uses that have negative fiscal impacts. Encourage the growth or relocation of industries that generate local tax and employment advantages. The commercial activities provided for within the Specific Plan area will greatly help in providing fiscal balance, local tax, and employment opportunities. 3.3 Evaluate fiscal impacts of new development on an ongoing basis and provide appropriate mitigation strategies. This policy is not applicable because it is a City directed policy. 3.4 Take advantage of Temecula's regional capture of taxable sales and continue to establish Temecula as retailing center along the Interstate 15 con'idor. The Harveston Specific Plan contains 112.4 acres of service commercial uses, which will help continue to establish Temecula as a retailing center along the Interstate 15 corridor. FEBRUARY 2001 66 r:~ooo~m~oJ~rcoss~rmvc~oc ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ELF~MENT Goal 4: Establishment of a diverse education and training and job placement system, which will develop and maintain a high quality work force in Temecnia. Discussion: The Harveston Specific Plan proposes learning institutions, such as university extension, a junior college, and learning centers (for elementary through high school) within the Mixed Use Village Center. Policies 4.1 Support economic development goals through a range of education and mdning activities. The Harveston Specific Plan supports educational programs and activities that would benefit the residents locally and throughout the City of Temecula. The Mixed Use Village Center contained in the Specific Plan permitted uses t~. t would allow for different education and training activities and programs. 4.2 Establish a proactive, periodic dialogue early in the planning process between the City and educational institutions, including school districts and community colleges, on issues related to the phasing of development, service standards and demands. During the development and design of the Harveston Specific Plan, the project's planners have continually been in contact with educational institutions on issues such as phasing of development, service standards and demands. The project's impacts on these institutions have been analyzed in the Environmental Impact Report. The project has been particularly in contact with the School District on the issue of locating a 12.0-acre elementary school within the project site. 4.3 Explore the potential for a comprehensive extension center through UC Riverside and/or the California State University system. The Harveston Specific Plan proposes learning institutions, such as university extension, a junior college, and learning centers (for elementary through high school) within the Mixed Use Village Center. Goal 5: Promote the advantages to businesses of locating in Temecnia, including cost advantages, amenities, housing, eommllnity activities and civic services. Discussion: The Harveston Specific Plan includes many incentives for businesses locating in Temecula and in the Harveston community. The proposed project provides an array of housing opportunities with varying costs, sizes, and densities, which provide opportunities to different income levels. In addition, it offers diverse amenities, recreation facilities, and open spaces throughout the community, which will appeal to many businesses. FEBRUARY 2001 67 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 Develop and maintain a marketing program to publicize the virtues of relocating to Temecula. This policy is not applicable because it is a City directed policy. Monitor the economic conditions in Temecula in comparison to other locations in California and throughout the nation to determine relative advantages. This policy is not applicable because it is a City directed policy. Monitor the supply of housing in relation to the supply of jobs in terms of balancing area-wide jobs, households, worker earnings and housing expenses. This policy is not applicable because it is a City directed policy. Monitor existing businesses in Temecula and identify the elements of a business retention program. This policy is not applicable because it is a City directed policy. Goal 6: Develop Temecula as a comprehensive, recognizable tourist destination, with a range of attractions throughout and beyond the sphere of influence. This goal is not applicable because it is a City directed goal. Policies 6.1 Encourage and enhance cooperative efforts with the wine-making industry in the Temecula Valley to promote Temecula as a destination resort. This policy is not applicable because it is a City directed policy. 6.2 Identify commercial recreation, convention and resort activities - including golf-oriented resorts - that can take advantage of Temecula's character and climate, while complementing wine- making activities. This policy is not applicable because it is a City directed policy. 6.3 Revitalize and enhance Old Town to expand its role in local tourism and to improve its am'activeness, accessibility, and economic vitality. This policy is not applicable because it is a City directed policy. 6.4 Enhance the City's image through development of cultural facilities, including performance arts, This policy is not applicable because it is a City directed policy. FEBRUARY 2001 68 ATFACHMENT NO 3 DRAFT ORDINANCE APPROVING THE ZONING STANDARDS R:\S PxHarveston SP~City CounciI\STAFFRPT 7-24-01.doc 13 ATTACHMENT NO. 3 ORDINANCE NO. 01- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, AMENDING THE DEVELOPMENT CODE TO AMEND SECTION 17.16.070 TO INCLUDE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 13 AND ADOPTING A PORTION OF CHAPTER 11 (DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS) ZONING STANDARDS CONTAINED THEREIN FOR RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT FOR THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 13, ON PARCELS TOTALING APPROXIMATELY 550 ACRES LOCATED ON THE EAST OF INTERSTATE 15, NORTH OF SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK, WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD AND SOUTH OF THE NORTHERN CITY LIMIT, AND FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NOS. 910-261- 001, 910-261-002, 910-110-013, 9 10-110-015, 910-110-020, 910-110- 021, 910-110-027, 910-110-076, 910-100-007, 910-100-008, 910-060- 009, 910-120-008, 911-630-001, 911-630-002, 911-630-003, 911-640- 001, 911-640-002, 911-180-002, 911-180-003, 911-180-004, 911-180- 008, 911-180-009, 911-180-015, 911-180-023 AND 911-180-028 (PLANNING APPLICATION 99-0418) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. On July 24, 2001 the City Council adopted the Harveston Specific Plan (SP 13) as Exhibit A of this Ordinance. Exhibit A is on file in the Official Records of the City Clerk and is incorporated herein by the reference as though set forth in full. The Zoning Standards shall be applicable to the area subject to the Harveston Specific Plan. The City Council, in approving the Application, hereby makes the following findings: That the project as proposed and conditioned is compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community. The project has been reviewed and determined to be in conformance with the City's General Plan. These documents set policies and standards that protect the health, safety and welfare of the community. Access and cimulation are adequate for emergency vehicles. The two excluded parcels not under the applicant's ownership that are located within the Specific Plan shall hereby be re-designated to become compatible with the surrounding land uses of the Harveston Specific Plan. The City hereby finds it necessary to change the Land Use Designation of the two excluded pamels to ensure the public health, safety and welfare of the City and to facilitate future development of these two parcels by removing the requirement for a separate Specific Plan. B. That the project is compatible with surrounding land uses. The project proposes similar residential neighborhoods adjacent to existing surrounding neighborhoods, with interface buffers and full roadway improvements. The limited neighborhood commercial development is proposed within a Village Center and is designed to be pedestrian oriented to serve the needs of the Harveston community. The Service Commercial is west of Ynez Road, adjacent to Interstate 15 where similar commercial and retail uses currently exist along the Interstate corridor. R:~S P~Harveston SP~City Cotm¢il~SP,DevCode&Zoning--CC Ord.doc 1 C. That the proposed project will not have an adverse effect on the community because it remains consistent with the goals and policies of the adopted General Plan. The project does not represent a significant change to the planned land uses for the site. Section2. Development Code Amendment. Section 17.16.070 of the Temecula Municipal Code is amended by adding the following to the end of the list contained in Section 17.16.070: "SP-13 Harveston" Section 3. Zoninq Standard Adoption. The City Council for the City of Temecula hereby adopts Sections 11.4, 11.5, and 11.6 of Chapter 11 of the Harveston Specific Plan Development Standards as an uncodified ordinance as contained in Exhibit B. Exhibit B is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full. Section 4. Environmental Compliance. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby finds that the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) and mitigation monitoring reporting program is consistent with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and that it accurately addresses the impacts associated with the adoption of these two Ordinances implementing the Harveston Specific Plan. Section 5. Severability. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any sentence, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance. Section 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be posted as required by law. R:~S PXHarveston SPXCity Council~SP,DevCode&Zoning--CC Ord.doc 2 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 24th day of July, 2001. ATTEST: Jeff Comerchero, Mayor Susan W. Jones, CMC/AAE City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA) I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 01- was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 24th day of July, 2001, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the day of ,2001 by the following roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC/AAE City Clerk RAS P~arveston SPXCiiy Council~SP,DcvCode&Zoning--CC Ord.doc 3 EXHIBIT A HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN (SP-13) Is on file in the Official Records of the City Clerk and is incorporated herein by this reference as though fully s et forth.. R:xS PXHarveston SimCity CouncilXSP,DevCode&Zoning--CC Ord.doc 4 EXHIBIT B SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING STANDARDS R:~S PkHarveston SPxCity Council~SP,DevCode&Zoning--CC Ord,doc 5 SECTION 11.0 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 11.4 ZONING ORDINANCE 11.4.1 Low Medium (LM) Density Residential Zone (3-5 dwelling units per acre) Planning Areas 1, 4, 7, and 10 The following regulations shall apply in the Low Medium Density Residential: Permitted / Conditionally Permitted Uses Matrix Low Medium Residential All types of non-commercial horticulture P Churches, synagogues and other similar religious structures and facilities including C incidental uses such as assembly, work rooms, living quarters of a priest, minister or family, and day care and educational facilities. Congregate care residential facilities for the elderly P Day care centers C Family day care homes - large, as defined by State law. C Family day care homes - small - 6 or fewer P Group care facilities and residential retirement homes, 6 or less people P Guest house or granny flat P : Home occupations, provided such occupations are customarily conducted as an accessory P : use entirely within a building containing a residential use or attached garage. No outdoor storage or uses shall be permitted. Public and private recreational facilities including, but not limited to: country clubs, tennis P and swim c!ubs, golf courses, lakes, parks, racquetball and handball. L'united commercial uses which are commonly associated and directly related to the primary uses are permitted. Public parks and public play,rounds P Residential care facilities for the elderly (six or fewer) P Secondary dwelling units/granny flats/guest house P Single family detached, single family attached P Telecommunication towers P Temporary real estate tract offices located within a subdivision, to be used only for and P during the original sale of the subdivision, provided a development plan is approved pursuant to City Ordinance. Trails P Other Uses: Any use that is not specifically listed above may be considered a permitted use provided that the Director of Planning finds that the proposed use is substantially the same in character and intensity as those listed in the designat~l subsections. Such a use is subject to the permit process, which governs the category in which it falls. The Harveston Specific Plan SECTION IL0 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 10. 11. d. The comer side yard shall not be less than ten feet (I0'). The Director of Planning may administratively approve modifications to these standards up to 15% for innovative and quality designs that meet the intent of the provisions for this Specific Plan. Parking. A minimum of two (2) enclosed spaces shall be provided per mfflot. Enclosures shall comply with all yard requirements. For second units, one additional enclosed parking space shall be provided. Fences and Walls. Fences and walls shall be permitted within the front, side, and rear yard set back areas, except as provided for below: a. Fences may not be erected within either public or private street rights-of-way. b. Wherever fencing is visible from public view, the finished side of the fencing shall be exposed to public view. c. No fence or wall shall exceed six feet (6) in height, unless a higher wall is specifically required for sound attenuation purposes. The height of the fence or wall shall be measured from the highest ground level immediately adjacent to the base of the wall. d. Privacy walls, if provided in side and rear yards, shall be a minimum of five feet (5') in height. e. In front yard set back areas, solid fences and walls shall not exceed thirty inches (30") in height; provided, however, that fences and walls up to six feet (6') in height are permitted in front yards if the ama above thirty inches (30") is no more than thirty percent (30%) solid. All pool enclosure fencing shall conform to applicable State of California or City of Temecula pool code fencing requirements, whichever is more stringent. Harveston Specific Plan SECTION 11.0 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS TABLE 11.1 SUMMARY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR LM (Low MEDIUM DENSITY R~sm~sr~L) ZONE Minimum Lot Area Per Dwelling Umt 4,000 Avera[~e Lot Area Per Dwelling Unit 5,000 Dwellin$ Units Per Net Acre 3 - 5 ~OT DIMENSIONS Minimum Lot Width at Front Propert~ Line 30 Minimum Lot Width for a Flag Lot, cul-de-sac, or knuckle at From 20 Property Line Minimum Lot Width at Required Front Setback Area 40 Average Lot Width 45 Minimum Lot Depth 80 iETBACKS Minimum Front Yard Variable* Minimum Corner Side Yard 10 Minimum Interior Side Yard Variable* Minimum Rear Yard Variable* MAXIMLrM HEIGHT 35 *Refer to Page 11-29 for specific setback requirements. REAR ACCESS Harveston Specific Plan 11-31 ]~,x~.~,~o,~,~n~,.$~.c-~.~t..*~',~rO~'~,..~,ro~'.~: SECTION 11.0 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 11.4.2 Medium 1 (MI) Density Residential Zone (5-7 dwelling units per acre) Planning Areas 2 and 8 The following regulations shall apply in the Medium 1 Density Residential: Permitted / Conditionally Permitted Uses Matrix Medium 1 All types of non commercial horticulture P Churches, synagogues and other similar religious structures and facilities including C incidental uses such as assembly, work rooms, living quarters of a priest, minister or family, and day care and educational facilities. P Congregate care residential facilities for the elderly Day care centers Family day care homes - large, as defined by State law. Family day care homes - small - 6 or fewer Group care facilities and residential retirement homes, 6 or less people Guest house or granny flat Home occupations, provided such occupations are customarily conducted as an accessory use entirely within a building containing a residential use or attached garage. No outdoor storage or uses shall be permitted. Public and private recreational facilities including,, but not limited to: country clubs, tennis and swim clubs, golf courses, lakes, parks, racquetball and handball. Limited commemial uses which are commonly associated and directly related to the primary uses are permitted. Public parks and public playgrounds Rear access C C P P P P P P P Residential care facilities for the elderly (six or fewer) P Secondary dwelling units/granny flats/guest house Single family detached, small lot single family detached, single family attached, cluster Temporary real estate tract offices located within a subdivision, to be used only for and during the original sale of the subdivision, provided a development plan is approved ~ursuant to City Ordinance. Trails I P P P P Other Uses: Any use that is not specifically listed above may be considered a permitted use provided that the Director of Planning £mds that the proposed use is substantially the same in character and intensity as those listed in the designated subsections. Such a use is subject to the permit process, which governs the category in which it falls. Harveston Specific Plan 11-33 SECTION 11.0 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Development Standards The following development standards shall apply in the Medium 1 Density Residential Zone of planning Areas 2 and 8. Table 11.2 provides a graphic SUl~mary of the fo[lowing Medium 1 (M1) development standards at the end of this section. For cluster projects within the M1, M2 and High density zoning districts, the development standards for lot sizes and setbacks may be varied by the Director of Planning as long as the cluster project falls within the allowed density ranges of the appropriate zone district. The purpose of this provision is to allow for innovative and alternative housing types around courtyards and common areas. 1. Building height shall not exceed two (2) stories, with a maximum height of thirty five feet (35'). 3. 4. 5. 6. A minimum of 50% of Medium 1 units shall incorporate architecture forward designs. Minimum residential lot area shall be not less than three thousand (3,000) square feet and the average residential lot area shall be not less than three thousand five hundred (3,500) square feet. Airspace condominiums are exempt from the minimum lot size requirements provided that the overall density is consistent with the planning area requirements. Land acreage located witliin Landscape Development Zones (LDZ's) shall not be included in area calculations for meeting minimum lot size requirements. The minimum lot width at the front property line shall be twenty five feet (25'), with an average lot width of forty feet (40') and a minimum lot depth of seventy feet (70'). Lots at the end of cul- de-sacs and knuckles may vary from the minimum depth requirement provided a lot provides an adequate area for development. The minimum lot width for a flag lot, cul-de-sac, or knuckle at front property line shall be twenty feet (20'). The minimum lot width at required front setback area shall be t '~h~rty five feet (35'). Minimum yard requirements are as fo[lows: Minimum front yard - Variable Front Yard Setback: In order to allow for a more interesting visual image and more flexible site planning, variable setbacks shall be used in the M1 planning area in accordance with Section 10.5 (Principal Design Criteria). Front yard setbacks from garage doors to back of sidewalk shall be a minimum of 18 feet. The main building structure setback shall be 10 feet from the property line. Other portions of a structure (including patios, porches and entrances) may be setback a minimum of 7 feet. Building setbacks shall be measured from the property line. Minimum interior side yard - Variable Side Yard Setbacks: Variable side yard setbacks may be permitted provided the sum of the side yard setbacks is not less than 8 feet and the distance between adjacent smactures is not less than 8 feet. For front loaded SECTION IL0 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 10. 11. 12. conditions a minimum of four-foot setback area, free of architectural encroachments shall be maintained on at least one side. c. Variable rear yard setback: 1) Garage forward and front loaded: a 10-foot minimum rear yard setback is permitted in the M-1 district, provided an average setback of 15 feet shall be maintained. 2) Rear vehicle access: the minimum rear yard setback to the garage shall be 3 feet and the main slructure setback shall be 15' (ground floor) and a 3' minimum with a 5' average setback for second story elements over the garage. At the rear of each lots, a minimum of 14 square feet of landscaping shall be provided (refer to Figure 11.13). c. The comer side yard shall not be less than ten feet (10') The Director of Planning may administratively approve modifications to these standards up to 15% for innovative and quality designs that meet the intent of the provisions for this Specific Plan (refer to Section 11.5 of this document). Parking. A minimum of two (2) enclosed spaces shall be provided per unit/lot. Enclosures shall comply with all yard requirements. Fences and Walls. Fences and walls shall be permitted within front, side, and rear yard set back areas except as provided for below: a. Fences may not be erected within either public or private street rights-of-way. Wherever fencing is visible from public view, the finished side of the fencing shall be exposed to public view. No fence or wall shall exceed six feet (6') in height, unless a higher wall is specifically required for sound attenuation purposes. The height of the wall or fence shall be measured from the highest ground level immediately adjacent to the base of the wall. Privacy walls, if provided in' side and rear yards, shall be a minimum of five feet (5) in height. In front yard set back areas, solid fences and walls shah not exceed thirty inches (30") in height; provided, however, that fences and walls up to six feet (6') in height are permitted in front yards if the area above thirty inches (30") is no more than thirty percent (30%) solid. All pool enclosure fencing shall conform to applicable State of California or City of Temecula pool cede fencing requirements, whichever is more stringent. Harveston Specific Plan 11-35 SECTION 11.0 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS TABLE 11.2 SUMMARY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR MI (MEI>IUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL, 5-7 DU's / AC) ZONE Minimum Lot Area Per Dwelling Unit 3,000 Average Lot Area Per Dwellin~ Unit 3,500 Dwelling Units Per Net Acre 5 - 7 LOT DIMENSIONS Minimum Lot Width at Front Property Line 25 Minimum Lot Width for a Flag LOt, cul-de-sac, or knuckle at Fron~ 20 Property Line Minimum LOt Width at Requ'rred Front Setback Area 35 Avera$e LOt Width 40 Minimum Lot Depth 70 SETBACKS Minimum Front Yard Variable* Minimum Comer Side Yard 10 Minimum Interior Sid.e Yard Variable* Minimum Rear Yard Variable* MAXIMUM HEIGHT 35 *Refer to Page 11-34 for specific setback requirements. ~RONT LOADED · ~ r-- ~ -- ~-;-,'r,.;,','~-- n " 'ibA REAR ACCESS I Harveston Specific Plan SECTION 11.0 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 11.4.3 Medium 2 (M2) Density Residential Zone (7-13 dwelling units per acre) Planning Areas 3~ 5~ 9 and 11 The following regulations shall apply in the Medium 2 Density Residential: Permitted/Conditionally Permitted Uses Matrix Medium 2 All types of non-commercial horticulture P Churches, synagogues and other similar religious smactures and facilities including C : incidental uses such as assembly, work rooms, liv'mg quarters of a priest, minister or family, and day care and educational facilities. : Condominium~ P Congregate care residential facilities for the elderly P Day care centers C Duplex (two-family dwellings) P Family day care homes - large, as defined by State law. C Family day care homes - small - 6 or fewer P Group care facilities and residential retirement homes, 6 or less people P Home occupations, provided such occupations are customarily conducted as an P accessory use entirely within a building containing a residential use or attached garage. No outdoor storage or uses shall be permitted. Public facilities (Planning Area 9 only) P Public and private recreational facilities including, but not limited to: country clubs, P tennis and swim clubs, golf courses, lakes, parks, racquetball and handball. Limited commercial uses which are commonly associated and directly related to the primary uses are permitted. Public parks and public playgrounds P Rear access P Residential care facilities for the elderly (six or fewer) P Secondary dwelling units/granny flats/~uest house P Single family attached P Single family detached (small lots, clustered) P Temporary real estate tract offices located within a subdivision, to be used only for and P during the original sale of the subdivision, provided a development plan is approved ~ursuant to City Ordinance. Trails P Other Uses: Any use that is not specifically listed above may be considered a permitted use ~rovided that the Director of Planning finds that the proposed use is substantially the same in character and intensity as those listed in the designated subsections. Such a use is subject to the permit process, which governs the category in which it falls. Harveston Specific Plan 11-37 SECTION 11.0 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Development Standards The following standards of development shall apply in the Medium 2 Density Residential Zone of Planning Areas 3, 5, 9 and 11. Table 11.3 provides a graphic summary of the following Medium 2 (M2) development standards at the end of this section. For cluster projects within the MI, M2 and High density zoning districts, the development standards for lot sizes and setbacks may be varied by the Director of Planning as long as the cluster project falls within the allowed density ranges of the appropriate zone district. The purpose of this provision is to allow for innovative and alternative housing types around courtyards and common areas. 1. Building height shall not exceed three (3) stories, with a maximum height of forty feet (40'). Minimum residential lot area shall be not less than two thousand (2,000) square feet and the average residential lot area shall be not less than two thousand five hundred (2,500) square feet. Airspace condominiums are exempt from the minimum lot size requirements provided that the overall density is consistent with the planning area requirements. Land acreage located within Landscape Development Zones (LDZ's) shall not be included in area calculations for meeting minimum lot size requirements. The.minimum lot width at the front property line shall be twenty five feet (25'), with an average lot width of thirty feet (30') and a minimum lot depth of sixty feet (60'). Lots at the end of cul-de- sacs and knuckles may vary from the minimum depth requirement provided a lot provides an adequate area for development. The minimum lot width for a flag lot, cul-de-sac, or knuckle at front property line shall be twenty feet (20'). 7. The minimum lot width at required front setback area shall be thirty feet (30'). 8. Minimum yard requirements are as follows: Minimum front yard - The main building structure setback shall be 10 feet from the property line. Other portions of a structure including patios and courtyards may be setback a minimum of 3 feet. Porches shall be setback a minimum of eight feet (8'). Front yard setbacks from garage doors to back of sidewalk shall be a minimum of 18 feet. Building setbacks shall be measured from the property line. Minimum interior side yard - Variable Side Yard Setbacks: Variable side yard setbacks may be permitted provided the sum of the side yard setbacks is not less than 6 feet and the distance between adjacent structures is not less than 6 feet. For attached units, interior side yard setback shall be reduced to zero feet. 'c. Variable rear yard setbacks: 1) Front loaded: an 8-foot minimum rear setback is permitted in the M-2 distxict, provided an average setback of 10 feet shall be maintained. Harveston Specific Plan 11-38 SECTION 11.0 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 10. 11. 12. 2) Rear vehicle access: the minimum mar yard setbacks to the garage shall be 3 feet and the main structure setback shall be iff (ground floor) and a 3' minimum with a 5' average setback for second story elements over the garage. At the rear of each lot, a minimum of 12 square feet of landscaping shall be provided (refer to Figure 11.13). d. The comer side yard shall not be less than ten feet (10') Minimum yard requirements in the Mixed Use Overhy zone may be waived or altered by the Director of Planning in order to achieve the mix of uses, building scale and design elements, as described in Section 11.4.5. The Director of Planning may administratively approve modifications to these standards up to 15% for innovative and quality designs that meet the intent of the provisions for this Specific Plan (refer to Section 11.5 of this document). Parking. A minimuna of two (2) enclosed spaces shall be provided per unit/lot. Enclosures shall comply with all yard requirements. Fences and Walls. Fences and walls shall be permitted within front, side, and rear yard set back areas except as provided for below: a. Fences may not be erected within either public or private street fights-of-way. Wherever fencing is visible from public view, the finished side of the fencing shall be exposed to public view. No fence or wall shall exceed six feet (6') in height, unless a higher wall is specifically required for sound attenuation purposes. The height of the fence or wall shall be measured from the highest ground level immediately adjacent to the base of the wall. Privacy walls, if provided in side and rear yards, shall be a minimum of five feet (5') in height. In front yard set back areas, solid fences and walls shall not exceed thirty inches (30") in height; provided, however, that fences and walls up to six feet (6') in height are permitted in front yards if the area above thin'y inches (30") is no more than thirty percent (30%) solid. All pool enclosure fencing shall conform to applicable State of California or City of Temecula pool code fencing requirements, whichever is mom stringent. For milgious institutions and community facilities in Planning Area 9 supplemental landscaping, screening and buffering shall be required adjacent to residential uses. The Director of Pla~nlng shall determine the adequacy of this requirement. Harveston Specific Plan 11-39 SECTION 11.0 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS TABLE 11.3 SUMMARY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR M2 (MEDIUM DENSITY RESlDENTIAL~ 7-13 DU's / AC) - ZONE RESlI)Ei~'rIAL DEvELOpMENT STANDARDS Minimum Lot Area Per Dwellin~ Unit Averate Lot Area Per Dwellint Unit Dwellint Units Per Net Acre [~OT DIMENSIONS 2,500 7-13 Minimum Lot Width at Front Property Line Minimum Lot Width for a Flag Lot, cul-de-sac, or knuckle at Fron Property Line Minimum Lot Width at Required Front Setback Area Average Lot Width Minimum Lot Depth E~AC~ 25 20 30 30 60 Minhnum Front Yard I 18 Minimum Comer Side Yard I Variable* Minimum Interior Side Yard Variable* Minimum Rear Yard Variable* , MAXIMUM HEIGRT 40 *Refer to Page 11-38 for specific setback requirements. FRONT LOADED f ..... '~ -[- REAR ACCESS f ...... t.~_..~,~.~.~ i1\/\ / l :IVV ! I.I '~'~' , I~°~ Harveston Specific Plan 11-40 ~,~,~:~,~.~.,~-~ ~,~-o~,.~,,~,,~ SECTION 11.0 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 11.4.4 High (H) Density Residential Zone (13- 20 dwelling units per acre) Planning Area 6 The following regulations shall apply in the High Density Residential: Permitted / Conditionally Permitted Uses Matrix High Density Residential All types of horticulture P Attached residential units (apartments, condominium~, duplex, etc.) P Churches, synagogues and other similar religious structures and facilities including C incidental uses such as assembly, work rooms, living quarters of a priest, minister or family, and day care and educational facilities. Congregate care residential facilities for the elderly P Day care centers P Family day care homes - large C Family day care homes - small P Group care facilities and residential retirement homes, 6 or less people P Home occupations, provided such occupations are customarily conducted as an P accessory use entirely within a building containing a residential use or attached garage. No outdoor storage or uses shall be permitted. Nurser~ schools for preschool day care P Public and private recreational facilities P Public parks and public play~rounds P Residential care facilities for the elderly (six or fewer) P Secondary dwelling units/granny flats/guest house P Temporary real estate tract offices located within a subdivision, to be used only for P and during the original sale of the subdivision, provided a development plan is approved pursuant to City Ordinance. Trails P Other Uses: Any use that is not specifically listed above may be considered a permitted use provided that the Director of Planning finds that the proposed use is substantially the same in character and intensity as those listed in the designated subsections. Such a use is subject to the permit process, which ~overns the cate~oW in which it falls. Harveston Specific Plan 11-41 SECTION 11.0 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Development Standards The following standards of development shall apply in the High Density Residential Zone of planning Area 6. Table 11.4 provides a graphic summary of the following High (H) development standards at the end of this section. For cluster projects within the M1, M2 and High density zoning districts, the development standards for lot sizes and setbacks may be varied by the Director of Planning as long as the cluster project falls within the allowed density ranges of the appropriate zone district. The purpose of this provision is to allow for innovative and alternative housing types around courtyards and common areas. 1. Building height shall not exceed three (3) stories, with a maximum height of fifty feet (50'). 2. Minimum residential lot area shall be not less than five thousand (5,000) square feet. Land acreage located within Landscape Development Zones (LDZ's) shall not be included in area calculations for meeting minimum lot size requirements. The minimum lot width at the front property line shall be thirty feet (30'), with an average lot width of fifty feet (50') and a minimum lot depth of one hundred feet (100'). Lots at the end of cul-de-sacs and knuckles may vary from the minimum depth requirement provided a lot provides an adequate area for development. 5. The minimum lot width at required front setback area shall be thirty feet (30'). 6. Minimum yard requirements are as follows: Variable Development Perimeter Setback: In order to allow for a more interesting visual image and more flexible site planning, variable setbacks may be permitted in the high density planning area. Development Perimeter Setbacks for the main slructure shall be a minimum of 6'. Patios, porches, and entrances may be setback a minimum of 3'. Where the property abuts a minimum 25' parkway (which may include a sidewalk), the setback for patios, porches, and entrances may be reduced to 0'. Setbacks shall be measured from the property line. b. Minimum interior lot setback. The minimum interior lot setback shall be 5 feet. Variable Building Separation: Building separation setbacks shall have a minimum of 20 feet with an average of at least 25 feet. The Director of Planning may adminislxatively approve modification to these standards up to 15% for innovative designs and quality that meet the intent of the provisions for this Specific Plan (refer to Section 11.5 of this document). Multi-family residential development abutting a side property line to a single-family development shall not exceed the height of the adjacent single-family residential by more than one story in height. Harveston Specific Plan 1142 ~,vou~s~0~oo~:m¢~,~m ~w.*m~,. SECTION 11.0 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 10. 11. 12. 13. Parking. Automobile storage space shall be provided as follows for multiple-family residences: a. Duplex, triplexes: 2 covered spaces/unit, plus 1 guest space / 2 units. Multiple family residential - 3 or fewer bedrooms: 2 covered spaces/unit, plus I guest space / 2 units. Multiple family residential - 4 or more bedrooms: 2 covered spaces/unit for first 3 bedrooms, then i space/bedroom for each additional bedroom. Open space shall be provided as follows for multiple family residences. For ground-level units, a minimum of seventy-five (75) square feet of private outdoor open space in the form of a patio or fenced yard shall be provided per unit with a minimum width of eight feet (8). All other dwelling units shall be provided with a minimum of fifty (50) square feet of private outdoor space in the form of a balcony, with a minimum width of six feet (6). Recreational Area. A minimum of two hundred (200) square feet per dwelling unit shall be provided as common passive and active recreational space. This common open space/recreational space shall exclude all parking areas. Wails and Fences. Walls and fences shall be permitted within front, side, and rear yard set back areas except as provided for below: a. Fences may not be erected within either public or private street rights-of-way. b. Two-sided fencing shall be used wherever visible from a public or private street. No fence or wall shah exceed six feet (6') in height, unless a higher wall is specifically required for sound attenuation purposes. The height of the wall or fence shall be measured from the highest ground level immediately adjacent to the base of the wall. Privacy walls, if provided in side and rear yards, shall be a minimum of five feet (5) in height. In front yard set back areas, solid fences and walls shall not exceed thirty inches (30") in height; provided, however, that fences and walls up to six feet (6') in height are permitted in front yards if the area above thirty inches (30") is no more than thirty percent (30%) solid. Ail pool enclosure walls and fencing shall conform to applicable State of California or City of Temecula pool code fencing requirements, whichever is more stringent. Refuse Collection Areas: Ail refuse collection areas and structures shah be designed and provided in accordance with applicable City of Temecula gnidelhies and policies. Harveston Specific Plan 1143 SECTION 11.0 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Storage and trash collection structures shall not be located within any required setback area, including front, side, and rear yard setbacks. Refuse collection areas and structures shall be conveniently accessible to the units/buildings they are designed to serve. Smactures which are used for storage or trash collection shall be screened by landscaping, solid walls/fencing, or combination thereof, in such a manner as not to be visible from a public street or from any adjacent residential area. Walls and fences used to screen storage or trash collection areas shall be solid and shall not exceed six feet (6) in height from the highest grade. Recycling processing facilities shall not be permitted; however, recycling collection facilities are specifically permitted uses subject to the conditions of this section. Harveston Specific Plan 11-44 ,~o~woL,~..~,~0~c_~o~ ~'~'~- SECTION 11.0 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS TABLE 11.4 SUMMARY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR H 0tIGH DENSITY RE$1DENTIA~ 13-20 DU's / AC} - ZONE RESIDENTIAL DI~WELO~ STANDARD~ [ H Minimum Lot Area ] 5,000 Dwellinl[ Units Per Net Acre 13 - 20 LOT DIMENSIONS Minimum Lot Width at Front Property Line Minimum Lot Width for a Flag Lot, cul-de-sac, or knuckle at Fron Property Line Minimum Lot Width at Required Front Setback Area Average Lot Width Minimum Lot Depth ~ETBACKS 30 NA 3O 5O 100 Minimum Development Perimeter Variable* Minimum Interior Lot Setback Minimum Buildinl~ Separation MAXIMUM PrEIGHT Variable* 50 *Refer to Page 11-42 for specific setback requirements. PARKWAY P~RKWA¥ MIJLTI-FAMILY Harveston Specific Plan 11-45 ~,*.~_~-c,n¢.r..~ ~.~w-~o~*m,.,,,~,~o: SECTION 11.0 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 11.4.5 Mixed-Use Overlay Zone plonnlqg Areas 3~ 4~ and 6 The following regulations shall apply in the Mixed-Use Overlay zone: Permitted / Conditionally Uses Matrix Mixed-Use Overlay Zone Adult education programs P Adult exercise, health and fitness center P Antique shops P Apparel and accessory shops P Art supply shops and studios P Athletic courts (tennis/baskethall) P Bakery shops retail P Bandstand P Banke/credit union ATM's P Barber and beauty shops P Bars and cocktail lounges when associated with live entertainment C Bicycle (sales, rentals, services) without outside storage P Bicycle sales and rentals with outside storage C Blueprint, repro~raphics and duplicating services P Bookstores (with library/coffee shop) P Boys and girls club P Cable TV office P Camera shop P Candy/confectionery sales P Catering services P Clothing stores P Clubhouse with meeting rooms for uses such as homeowners associations, clubs, P physician/nurse training, university extension courses, vocational training classrooms, etc. Coffee shop P Coin shop P Community play,round P Computer and copy cen~r P Computer and typewriter sales and rental, including incidental repairs P Congregate care (does not count against the 1,921 units) P Cultural arts facility P Dance halls C Day care centers P Delicatessens P Drug stores and pharmacies P Dry cleaners P Harveston Specific Plan 1146 SECTION IL0 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Permitted / Conditionally Uses Matrix~ Mixed-Use Overlay Zone Dry goods stores P Employment agencies P Financial, insurance real estate offices P Fire and police stations P Florists shops P Fortune telling, spiritualism or similar activity P Gift shops P Hardware stores, not including outside storage P Healthcare facility P Historic interpretive center P Hobby shops P Household goods sales, including but not limited to, new and used appliances, P furniture, carpets, draperies, lamps, radios and television sets, including repair thereof Ice cream shops P Interior decorating shops P JewelW stores, including incidental repairs P Library (school/city or county) P Liquor stows C Locksmith shops P Mail order businesses P Markets, including but not limited to food, wholesale, produce, fruit, vegetable, fish, P and poultry and meat markets, but not including slaughtering. Medical equipment sales/wntal P Music stows P Neighborhood coffee house P News stows P Notions or novelty stows P Offices, including but not limited to business, law, medical, dental, chiropractic, P architectural, engineering, community planning and real estate. Outdoor venders (refer to "Outdoor Vendors" in this section) P Paint and wallpaper stores, not includin~ paint contractors P Parcel delivery services P Performing arts facility/theater P Personal service shops P Pet shops and pet supply shops P Photography shops and studios and photo engraving P Picnic areas P Post office (and other federal/state functions) P Pottery store P Printers or publishers P Private utility facilities P Religious institutions, without a daycare or private school C Religious institutions, with a private school C Harveston Specific Plan 11-47 SECTION 11.0 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Permitted / Conditionally Uses Matrix Mixed-Use Overlay Zone Religious institutions, with a daycare C Residential P Restaurants and other eating establishments, not including drive-in and drive-thru P restaurants or restaurants with bars/cocktail lounges that offer live entertainment. Restaurants or other eating establishments with bars that offer live entertainment C Schools, business and professional, including but not limited to art, barber, beauty, P dance, drama, music and swimming. Senior center P Senior citizen housing P Shared parking area P Sporting goods stores P Stationer stores P Tailor shops P Telecommuting center P Telephone exchanges P Theaters, not including drive-ins C Tobacco shops P Tourist information centers P To)' shops P Travel agencies P Visitor/sales information center P Watch repair shops P Other Uses: Any use that is not specifically listed above may be considered a permitted use provided that the Director of Planning finds that the proposed use is substantially the same in character and intensity as those listed in the designated subsections. Such a use is subject to the permit process, which governs the category in which it falls and is compatible with the overall communit)' character within the Harveston Specific Plan area. Use of the Village Green: This is a unique urban space designed to provide for gathering places and entertainment uses that are compatible with the surrounding uses. Outdoor entertainment uses are also permitted in this area. Temporary uses are permitted in the Mixed-Use Overlay Zone of Planning Areas 3, 4, and 6 provided a temporary use permit has been granted pursuant to Section 17.040.020 of Temecula Development Code. Harveston Specific Plan 1148 SECTION 11.0 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Development Standards The following lists the development standards for the Mixed Use Overlay Zone. Any development standard that is not referenced in this section will revert back to the underlying zoning for the Mixed Use Overlay Zone, which is residential. The following standards of development are required in the Mixed-Use Overlay zone of Planning Areas 3, 4, and 6. Lot Area. There is no minimum lot area requirement; however, no subdivision of the Mixed-Use Overlay zone shall be permitted without an approved development plan, which shall occur at an adminisU'ative level, provided the plan is consistent with the "Site Planning Guidelines" in the proceeding pages. A minimum of 10,000 sq. ft. of retail development is required. Within the Village Center no minimum size is required for individual development. 2. Setbacks. Where the front, side or rear yard adjoins a street, the setback shall be (0) from the LDZ (please refer to Figure 10.1-11). Where the side or rear yard adjoins a lot zoned for single family detached residential use, the minimum setback shall be ten feet (i0') from the property line. c. Setback areas may be used for driveways, parking and landscaping. 3. Height Requirements. All buildings and structures shall not exceed fifty feet (50') in height. 4. Landscaping. There shall be no landscape requirements for retail and office uses. For all other uses, a minimum of fifteen percent (15%) of the site proposed for development shall be landscaped and irrigated. Parking lot landscaping and shading shall conform to applicable City of Temecuia Development Code. Parking. Automobile storage space shall generally be five (5) spaces for every one thousand (1,000) square feet of gross leasable floor area. Specific parking requirements for future uses shall be addressed at the site plan review phase when the type of use is known. Mechanical Equipment. All roof mounted mechanical equipment shall be screened from the ground elevation view to a minimum sight distance of one thousand three hundred twenty feet (1,320'). Screening shall be incorporated into the architecture with similar materials and finishes. 7. Refuse Collection Areas: All refuse collection areas and structures shall be designed and provided in accordance with applicable City of Temecula roles and policies. Harveston Specific Plan 11-49 SECTION 11.0 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Storage and trash collection structures shall not be located within any required setback area, including front, side, and rear yard setbacks. Refuse collection areas and stxuctures shall be conveniently accessible to the buildings they are designed to serve. Structures which are used for storage or trash collection shall be screened by landscaping, solid walls/fencing, architectural features, or combination thereof, in such a manner as not to be visible from a public street or from any adjacent residential area. Walls and fences used to screen storage or u'ash collection areas shall be solid and shall not exceed six feet (6') in height from the highest grade. 8. Lighting All lighting £Lxtures, including spot lights, electrical reflectors and other means of illumination for signs, sUmctures, landscaping, parking, loading, unloading, and similar areas shall be focused, directed and arranged to prevent glare or direct illumination on streets or adjoining property. The level of on-site lighting, as well as the type of fighting fmtures, shall comply with all applicable requirements of the City of Temecuia and Mount Palomar Observatory. High pressure sodium lights may be used as sUe, et lighting in the pedestrian areas of the Village Center. c. The maximum height for parking lighting fixtures shall not exceed twenty feet (20'). Outdoor Vendors Outdoor vending on private property promotes public interest by contributing to an active pedesUian environment. However, reasonable regulation of outdoor vending is necessary to protect the public health, safety and welfare. 2. Definitions For purposes of this section, the following definitions shall apply: "Stand" means a pushcart, wagon or any other wheeled vehicle or device which may be moved without the assistance of a motor and is used for the displaying, storing or transporting of articles offered for sale by a vendor. "Vending" means the sale of food or merchandise from a stand operating on private property within the Specific Plan area (Mixed Use Village Center). Harveston Specific Plan 11-50 SECTION 11.0 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Vendors License Required It shall be unlawful to sell, or offer for sale, any food, beverage or merchandise on any property within the Mixed Use Village Center area without first obtaining a Vendors License. 4. Applications The application for a Vendors License shall be signed by the applicant and shall include: The name, home, and business address of the applicant, and the name and address of the owner, if other than the applicant, of the vending stand to be used in the operation of the vending business. b. A description of the type of food, beverage, or merchandise to be sold. A description and photograph (including signage and colors) of any stand to be used in the operation of the business. Issuance Not later than 30 days after the filing of a completed application for a vendor's license, the applicant shall be notified of the decision on the issuance or denial of the license. Licenses to vend within the Mixed Use Village Center area shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Planning in conjunction with the Business License RegisU'ation Program, Building and Safety and the Public Works Department. There should be at least 150 square feet of useable or recognizable plaza or courtyard area for each allowed outdoor vending cart. The vending should be free of all obstructions. Locations for vending within the Mixed Use Village Center area shall be approved by the Director of Planning. Vending locations shall be designated based on the ability of the site to safely accommodate the use by not interfering with pedestrian circulation and access or vehicle circulation or parking. The Director of Planning may require that the stand be removed from the location and stored out of public view when not in use. Vending locations may change only upon written request by an applicant and approved by the Director of Planning. Ail vending locations shall be on privately owned, developed, commercial property within the Mixed Use Village Center area. Harveston Specific Plan 11-51 SECTION 11.0 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Term and Renewal All licenses are valid for one year unless revoked or suspended prior to expiration. An application to renew a license shall be made not later than 60 days before the expiration of the current license. License fees and renewal procedures shall be established in accordance with the Business License Registration Program procedures outlined in the Municipal Code. Prohibited Conduct and Hours of Operation It shall be prohibited for any outdoor vendor to operate under any of the following conditions: a. Operate between 10 p.m. to 6 a.m. of the following day unless in conjunction with a special event. b. Leave any vending stand unattended. c. Store, park or leave any vending, stand within any public right-of-way or on any undeveloped or otherwise vacant property. d. Sell food or beverages for immediate consumption unless there is a litter receptacle available nearby for public use. e. Leave any location without first picking up, removing and disposing of all trash or refuse remaining from sales made from the stand. f. Allow any items relating to the operation of the vending business to be placed anywhere other than in, on or under the stand. g. Set up, maintain or permit the use of any additional table, crate, carton, rack or any other device to increase the selling or display capacity of the stand where such additional items have not been approved by the Director of Planning. h. Solicit or conduct business with persons in motor vehicles. i. Sell anything other than that which the license permits. j. Sound or permit the sounding of any device which produces a loud and mucous noise, or use or operate any loud speaker, public address system, radio, sound amplifier, or similar device to attract the attention of the public. Vending Stand Requirements a. Vendor shall be required to submit a photograph or drawing of the vending stand to be used for review during application approval process, including materials, colors and signage. b. The design and appearance of the vending cart shall be consistent in character with the design theme of the Mixed Use Village Center. SECTION 11.0 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 10. 11. 12. c. No stand shall exceed four feet (4') in width, six feet (6) in length, and eight feet (8') in height. Safety Requirements All stands in or from which food is prepared or sold shall comply with the following requirements: a. All equipment installed in any part of the stand shall be secured in order to prevent movement during transit and to prevent detachment in the vent of a collision or overturn. b. Ail utensils shall be stored in order to prevent their being hurled about in the event of a sudden stop, collision or overturn. A safety knife holder shall be provided to avoid loose storage of knives. c. Compressors, auxiliary engines, generators, batteries, battery chargers, gas fueled water heaters, and similar equipment shall be installed so as to be hidden from view to the extent possible and be easily accessible. Display of License Ail licenses shall be displayed in a visible and conspicuous location at all times during the operation of the vending business. Advertising No advertising, except the posting of prices, shall be permitted on any stand, except to identify the name of the product or the name of the vendor. Denial, Suspension and Revocation Any license may be denied, suspended or revoked in accordance with the procedures in the Municipal Code for any of the following causes: a. Fraud or misrepresentation contained in the application for the license. b. Fraud or misrepresentation made in the course of carrying on the business of vending. c. Conduct of the licensed business in such manner as to create a public nuisance, or constitute a danger to the public health, safety, welfare or morals. d. Conduct which is contrary to the provision of this section. Harveston Specific Plan 11-53 m0,,vo~v,~r,u~N*6~0t~ux~m~_~,v.c~c.r~m~ ~,~- SECTION IL0 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Site Planning Guidelines As stated in Section 3.1.4, this overlay zone provides the opportunity to develop a mix of potential uses such as retail, restaurant, office uses, a daycare facility, a worship site, and private club house with fitness center (Village Club) and park, recreation, educational and residential uses. A maximum of 20,000 square feet of commercial/retail/office is permitted in this zone along with the 15,000 square feet Village Club, residential, recreation and educational uses. Th/s overlay will provide the potential for development projects winch create a "live, work and play environment." For an overall, "conceptual design" of the Mixed-Use Overlay zone, please refer to Figure 11.14, Mixed Use Village Center Conceptual Plan with Building Placement and Landscape Treatment. This design is "conceptual" subject to revisions as individual properties are developed. The plan and guidelines which follow are intended to ensure that this area is developed in a manner consistent with the intent of the Mixed-Use Overlay to create a "Village Center" at Harveston. A proposed permitted mixed-use which the Community Development Department deems to be in conformance with the following guideline principles, shall be approved administratively by the Director of Planning. The Director of Planning reserves the right to bring any project or use to the Planning Commission due to controversial or complex issues related to the use or development. Mixture of Uses Integrate mixed-uses into a single structure with retail on the lower level, office and residential on upper levels. 2. Residential units should always be located above any commercial use. Vertical mixed use projects (where uses are combined in a single structure) is preferred over horizontal mixed use projects (where uses are distributed in separate structures). When mixed uses are combined within a single structure, the intensity of use should decrease as the floors increase. Permanent barriers, which preclude pedestrian circulation through a mixed use project, are strongly discouraged. 6. Oppommities for convenient transit access from the Village Center are strongly encouraged. The commercial anchors for the Village Center should be entertainment, restaurant or grocery stores, versus the suburban prototypical department store. 8. Encourage the provision of community facilities in the Mixed-use Village Center areas. Allow for residential densities at the top of the density range for those projects that offer mixed- 10. Consider higher residential densities and intensities that will support mass transit options. 11. Compliment retail uses with personal service shops, office and residential uses. 12. Provide for community gathering spaces, public meeting rooms, conference rooms and exhibition areas. Harveston Specific Plan 11-54 ~o~,~oL,~o,~m~n,m~c~ ~vmo~. SECTION 11.0 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Building Scale and Design Buildings shall be adjacent to the street or the adjacent landscape planter area to create a pedestrian oriented streetscape within the Mixed Use Village Center. The overall design of buildings in the Mixed-use Village Center area shall be compatible in terms of landscaping, architectural design, building materials and the relationship between buildings. The overall scale and design of buildings in a Village Center area should be compatible with one another. 3. Single story commercial structures are discouraged. 4. The first floor of any multi floor building should be oriented to the pedestrian. Buildings with large landscaped setbacks are not desirable. Whenever possible, consolidate multiple landscape setback areas into usable "urban" plazas with seating, paving, and lighting accents. Whenever it is impossible or undesirable to provide multiple floors, the use of mezzanines or open ceiling spaces are preferred. Large landscaped buffer yards are discouraged in favor of pedestrian plazas, civic plazas, mmsit station facilities and other public open space options. 8. Residential units shall be at least two stories high and employ neo-traditional principles. Parking and Vehicular Circulation Parking lots shall be located internally within the project area and not located only on the perimeter as with the "typical" shopping center. Parking lots, garages, and other facilities should generally be located at the rear or at the side of buildings. 3. Shared parking between businesses shall be provided whenever possible. 4. Parking areas shall be well-landscaped internally as well as along the perimeter. Large expanses of paving uninterrupted by landscaping shall not be permitted. One tree shall be provided for every six (6) parking stalls. 6. Parking aisles shall be separated from pedestrian access routes whenever possible. Parking lot design should incorporate pedestrian pathways through the lot versus around the perimeter. Separate vehicular and pedestrian circulation systems shall be provided in Mixed-use Village Center areas. (Refer to Figure 11.15, Mixed Use Village Center Pedestrian and Vehicular Circulation and Parking). Harveston Specific Plan 11-56 ,~,voL,~omm,~s~m~m~oom:~¢.~ ~,~o~. SECTION 11.0 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Pedestrian Circulation/Pedestrian-Oriented Design Provide pedestrian and non-motorized vehicular access between the Mixed-use Village Center area and other uses in the Harveston community. Site Planning for the Mixed-use Village Center areas shall provide pedestrian circulation areas that are linked to the Loop Road paseo system. The design of the building facades shall be architecturally interesting and in scale with the pedestrian. Sidewalks adjacent to shop storefronts should be at least ten feet wide to facilitate browsing, stopping to talk, or walking through. Ground floor elevations shall avoid large blank walls, with windows and doorways located at frequent intervals. Large wall surfaces shall be divided with offsets, projections, step-backs, and penetrations to provide distinctive shadow lines. Site planning and design shall be sensitive to the need to create defensible spaces for the protection of the pedestrian. Consider pedestrian circulation patterns, sunlight conditions, wind pattern, and the selection of building and landscape materials, when locating a pedestrian open space. Landscape treatment throughout the Mixed-use Village Center shall have a unifying theme emphasizing the more urban-like environment, yet blends with the adjoining residential neighborhoods. Transit Connection Provide facilities for future connections to regional bus systems. (Refer to Figure 11.15, Mixed Use Village Center Pedestrian and Vehicular Circulation and Parking). Harveston Specific Plan 11-57 SECTION 11.0 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 11.4.6 Service Commerdal Planning Area 12 The following regulations shall apply in the service commercial zone: Permitted / Conditionally Permitted Uses Matrix South (S) or North (N) Service Commercial Date Sa-e~t Aerobics/dance/gymnastics/jazzercise/martial arts studios P S&N Alcohol and drug lreatment (outpatient) C S&N Alcoholic beverage sales C S&N Alcoholism or drug treatment facilities C S&N Ambulance services P S&N Animal hospital/shelter P S&N Antique restoration C S&N Antique shops P S&N Apparel and accessory shops P S&N Appliance stores, household (glass and mirror retail services) P S&N Arcades (pinball and video games) C S&N Art supply shops and studios P S&N Auction houses P S&N Auditoriums and conference facilities C S&N Automobile painting and body shop C S&N Automobile parts and sales P S&N Automobile rental P , S&N Automobile repair services (no outdoor storage) P S&N Automobile sales P S&N Automobile service stations with or without an automated car wash P S&N Bakery goods distributors P S&N Bakery retail P S&N Bakery wholesale P S&N Banks and financial institutions P S&N Barber and beauty shops. P S&N Bicycle (sales, rentals, services) P S&N Billiard parlor/pool hall C S&N Binding of books and similar publications P S Blood banks P S&N Blueprinting, duplicating and copy services. P S&N Bookstores P S&N Bowling alley P S&N Building materials sales (with exterior storage/sales areas greater than 50% of total P S&N sales area) Building materiais sales (with exterior storage/sales areas less than 50% of total P S&N sales area) Butcher shop P S&N Cabinet shop P S&N Harveston Specific Plan 11-59 SECTION 11.0 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Permitted / Conditionally Permitted Uses Matrix south ($) or Service Commercial non. (n) Date Street Cabinet shops under 20,000 sq. ft. - no outdoor storage P S&N Camera shop (sales/minor repairs) P S&N Candy/confectionery sales P S&N Car wash, full service C S&N Carpet and rag cleaning P S&N Catering services P S&N Clothing stores P S&N Coins purchase and sales P S&N Communications equipment sales P S&N Commtmity care facilities P S&N Computer sales and service P S&N Congregate care housing for the elderly P S&N Construction equipment sales, service or rental C S&N Contractor's equipment sales, service or rental C S&N Convenience market P S&N Costume rentals P S&N Cutlery P S&N Data processing equipment and systems P S&N Day Care C S&N Delicatessens P S&N Discounffdepartmant stores P S&N Distribution facility C S&N l~g stores/pharmacy P S&N Dry cleaners P S&N Dry cleaning plant C S&N Electronics sales P S&N Emergency shelters C S&N Equipment sales and rentals P S&N Equipment sales and rentals (outdoor storage) C S&N Feed and grain sales P S&N Financial, insurance real estate offices P S&N Fire and police stations P S&N Floor covering sales P S&N Florist shop P S&N Fortune telling, spiritualism, or similar activity C S&N Funeral parlors, mortuary P S&N Furniture sales (no outdoor storage or display of merchandise) P S&N Furniture transfer and storage C S&N Garden supplies and equipment sales and service P S&N Gas distribution, meter and control station C S&N General merchandise/retail store P S&N Government offices P S&N Harveston Specific Plan 11-60 ,~o~,~oL,~o,~,n.n,o=,~,~_~c_~.~ ~*mo~,. SECTION 11.0 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Permitted / Conditionally Permitted Uses Matrix south (s) or Norl~ (N) Service Commercial Date Street Grocery store, retail P S&N Grocery store, wholesale P S&N Guns and firearms sales P S&N Hardware stores ' P S&N Health and exercise clubs P S&N Health care facility P S Health food stores P S&N Heliports C S&N Hobby supply shops P S&N Home and business maintenance service P S&N Hospitals C S&N Hotels/motels P S&N Ice cream parlor P S&N Interior decorating shops P S&N Kennel C S&N Laboratories, film, medical, research or testing centers P S Laundromat P S&N Laundry service (commercial) P S&N Libraries, museums and galleries (private) C S&N Liquor stores C S&N Lithographic service P S&N Locksmith P S&N Mail order businesses P S&N Manufacturing of products similar to, but not limited to, the following: Custom-made product, processing, assembling, packaging, and fabrication of goods P S within enclosed building (not outside storage), such as jeweky, furniture, art objects, clothing, labor intensive manufacturing, assembling, and repair processes which do not involve frequent truck traffic. Compounding of materials, processing, assembling, packaging, treatment or P S fabrication of materials and products, which require frequent truck activity or the transfer of heavy or bulky items. Wholesaling, storage, and warehousing within enclosed building, freight handling, shipping, truck services and terminals, storage and wholesaling from the premises or unrefined, raw or semi-refined products requLring further processing or manufacturin[~, and outside storage. Medical equipment sales/rental P S&N Membership clubs, organizations, ledges C S&N Mini-storage or mini-warehouse * S&N Mobile home sales and service P S&N Motion picture studio P S&N Motorcycle sales and service P S&N Please refer to Section 17.08 050R of the Development Code Musical and recording studio [ c I S~N I Harveston Specific Plan 11-61 SECTION 11.0 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Permitted / Conditionally Permitted Uses Matrix south (s) or North (N) Service Commercial Date ~treet Nightclubs/taverns/bars/dance club teen club C S&N Nurseries (retail) P S&N Nursing homes/convalescent homes C S&N Office equipment/supplies, sales/services P S&N Office, administrative or corporate headquarters with greater than 50,000 sq. ft. P S&N Offices, including but not limited to business, law, medical, dental, chiropractic, P S&N architectural, engineering, community planning and real estate. Paint and wallpaper stores P S&N Parcel delivery services P S&N Parking lots and parking smactures C S&N Pawn shops P S&N Personal service shops P S&N Pest control services P S&N Pet grooming/pet shop P S&N Photographic studio P S&N Plumbing supply yard (enclosed or unenclosed) C S&N Postal services P S&N Printing and publishing (newspapers, periodicals, books, etc.) P S&N Private utility facilities (regulated by the public utilities commission) P S&N Radio and broadcasting studio, offices P S&N Recreational vehicle sales . C S&N Recreational vehicle, trailer and boat storage - exterior yard C S&N Recreational vehicle, trailer, and boat storage within an enclosed building C S&N Religious institutions C S&N Restaurant, drive-in/fast food C S&N Restaurants and other eatinl[ establishments P S&N Restaurants with lounge or live entertainment C S&N Rooming and boarding houses C S&N Schools, business and professional P S&N Scientific research and development offices and laboratories P S Sports and recreational facilities C S&N Swimming pool supplies/equipment sales P S&N Taxi or limousine services P S&N Telecommunication towers * S&N Tile sales P S&N Tobacco shop P S&N Truck sales/rentals/service C S&N TV/Vela, repair P S&N Upholstery shop C S&N Vending machine sales and service P S&N Warehousing/distribution C S Watch repair P S&N Welding supply and service (enclosed) P S&N * Please refer to Section 17.40 of the Development Code Harveston Specific Plan 11-62 SECTION 11.0 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Development Standards The following standards of development axe required in the Service Commercial Zone of Planning Area 12. To ensure the integrated development of Planning Area 12, the areas north and south of Date/Cherry Street shall be master planned prior to any land subdivision or development. Table 11.5, at the end of this section, provides a graphic summary of the following Service Commercial development standards. Development Standard (Planning Area 12) Lot Area. The minimum net lot area shall be thirty thousand square feet (30,000 sq. ft.) Height a. b. C. The maximum height of all structures, including buildings, shall be fifty feet (50'). A maximum height for fence, wall or hedge shall be six feet (6'). A maximum height for an accessory structure shall be twelve feet (12'). Landscaping a. A minimum of twenty percent (20%) of the site shall be landscaped and automatic irrigation shall be installed. b. Parking lot landscaping and shading shall conform to applicable City Ordinance. Setbacks a. A minimum of yard area setback adjacent to a street shall be twenty five feet (25') for an arterial street; twenty feet (20') for a collector; and ten feet (10') for a local street. b. A minimum yard adjacent to residentially zoned property shall be thirty feet (30'). c. A minimum interior side yard shall be (0), except that side yards adjacent to the Freeway shall be ten feet (10'). d. A minimum rear yard shall be ten feet (10'). e. A minimum side/rear setback for an accessory saucture shall be five feet (5'). f. A minimum width at required front setback area shall be one hundred feet (100'). g. A minimum depth shall be one hundred twenty feet (120'). h. A minimum frontage on a street shall be eighty feet (80'). A target floor area ratio for the uses within the Service Commercial shall be 0.40. Harveston Specific Plan 11-63 SECTION 11.0 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS lO. 11. 12. A maximum floor area ratio with intensity bonus as per Section 17.08.050 of the Temecula Development Code shall be 1.5. Screening. Parking, loading, trash and service areas shall be screened by structures and landscaping. They shall be located in such a manner as to minimize noise or odor nuisance. Screening shall be required at the face of buildings to break / soften long, two dimensional. It should be noted extensive landscaping will not be provided at the rear of buildings whose loading areas are not in the public view. This will be addressed at the development plan stage. Outside Storage Areas. Outside storage shall be screened with structures and landscaping. Landscaping shall be placed in a manner adjacent to the exterior boundaries of the area so that materials stored are screened from view. If a non-screened exhibit of products is proposed, it shall be pan of the Industrial Park Development Plan, and shall be setback at least ten feet (10') from the property line. Refuse Collection Areas/Loading Docks All refuse collection areas and structures and leading docks shall be designed and provided in accordance with applicable City of Temecula rules and policies. Storage and trash collection structures and leading docks shall not be located within any required setback area, including front, side, and rear yard setbacks. Refuse collection areas and structures shall be conveniently accessible to the buildings they are designed to serve. Loading docks and structures, which are used for storage or trash collection, shall be screened by landscaping, solid walls/fencing, architectural features, or combination thereof, in such a manner as not to be visible from a public street or from any adjacent residential area. eo Walls and fences used to screen storage or trash collection areas or loading docks shall be solid and shall not exceed six feet (6') in height from the..highest grade. Parking. Automobile parking shall comply with Chapter 17.24 of the Temecula Development Code. Utilities. All new utilities shall be underground. Mechanical Equipment. All roof mounted mechanical equipment shall be screened from the ground elevation view to a minimum sight distance of one thousand three hundred twenty feet (1,320'). Screening shall be incorporate into the architecture through the use of increased parapet wall height and other building wall elements. Harveston Specific Plan 11-65 SECTION 11.0 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 13. Lighting All lighting fixtures, including spot lights, electrical reflectors and other mean of illumination for signs, structures, landscaping, parking, loading, unloading, and similar areas shall be focused, directed and arranged to prevent glare or direct illumination on streets or adjoining property. The level of on-site lighting, as well as the type of lighting fixtures, shall comply with all applicable requirements of the City of Temecula and Mount Palomar Observatory. c. The maximum height for parking area lighting fixtures shall not exceed thirty feet (30'). 14. Building/Structure Design. All buildings and structures shall comply with the applicable provisions of the City-wide design guidelines. In addition, all elevations facing the freeway shah include substantially similar architectural txeatments that are located on the buildings' front elevations. SECTION 11.0 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 11.4.7 Signage Village Center Signage: Guidelines and Standards Special signage guidelines and standards are required for the Village Center. Effective signage will con~bute to the urban feel and the pedestrian scale of the development. Special signage requirements will also serve to identify the Village Center, while at the same time, effectively providing the necessary visibility needed by commercial development. These guidelines and standards, when combined with the building and landscape guidelines and standards will help create a "sense of place" in the Village Center. General Sign Guidelines 1. Appropriate. a. Generally, small, Iow key signage program for tenant spaces. b. Building mounted signs for project identity. c. Eye level signs; window and door signs, including pedestrian oriented projecting signs. d. Signs consistent with building texture, color and architectural style. e. Uniquely shaped signs that are related to the product or service provided (i.e., barber poll). f. Signs which have illumination sources consistent with Mount Palomar lighting standards and restrictions. Inappropriate/Prohibited a. Typical "can" or "box" signs with entire face areas in plastic. b. Individual plastic channel letters. c. Signs mounted above building rooflines (parapet), or roof-mounted signs. d. Signs which incorporate any manner of mechanical movement, audible elements, flashing or intermittent lighting, and/or moving or otherwise animated forms... e. Signs which interfere with or conflict with any traffic contxol device, create a safety hazard by obswacting the clear view of pedestrian or vehicular traffic or interfere with efficient operations of emergency vehicles. f. Signs, which prevent free access to or from any fire escape, door, window or exit, or access to any standpipe. g. Landscaping or the use of annual or ornamental flowers that form a sign or message. Harveston Specific Plan 11-67 SECTION 11.0 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS h. Signs not in scale with the pedestrian orientation. i. Neon window signs. j. Vehicle signs. k. Signs e~tending above the eave or parapet and roof-mounted signs. 1. Signs painted onto building surfaces or trash bins and their enclosures. m. Signs with disproportionate, visually distracting, or reflective surfaced background or graphics. n. Signs with non-contrasting background/graphics, which render the sign illegible. o. Inflatable signs. p. Off-site signage. q. Monument signs (except a theater monument or marquee). General Sign Standards and Specifications A comprehensive sign program for the entire Village Center shall be required prior to the approval of the first Development Plan. The area of a sign or logo with individual letters shall be measured by a rectangle around the outside of the lettering and/or the pictorial symbol. Planning and Building and Safety Departments review and approval is required prior to the placing, erecting, moving, or reconstructing of any sign within the Specific Plan area. All permanent signs shall require a permit prior to erecting or attaching the sign. If a situation arises that is not covered by these sign regulations or the type of permit required, the Director of Planning shall provide written interpretation after consulting the City's Sign Ordinance. All boilding-mounted signs shall meet all applicable city, state and federal codes. All signs containing electrical components shall conform to the Uniform Lighting Code. Signs shall be placed to be compatible with the building and accent the architectural design of the structure. Sign colors should be compatible with the building's color and the building. Signs and letter sizes shall be used which are complementary to the building scale. 2. 3. 4. 5. Harveston Specific Plan 11-68 ,~,~*ou~o~a~,,mN,~,em~m~_~c~e_~m~,n.~ ~a~ro~,- SECTION 11.0 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 11. Signs should have individually spaced letters. 12. Signs shall have concealed illumination source, either internal or external. Building Mounted Signs Retail and office uses shall have one (1) square foot of sign area per linear foot of business frontage, with a maximum letter height of sixteen (16") inches. Each business may use any combination of the following signs to arrive at the total allowable square footage. 1. Awning Signs Twenty percent (20%) maximum coverage allowed of the total exterior surface of each awning. Internal illumination is prohibited. 2. Projecting Signs No more than one (1) projecting sign will be allowed per tenant. The maximum size may not exceed six (6) square feet and shall not extend mom than three feet (3') from the wall surface. Projecting signs shall only be attached to buildings and shall not be illuminated. Signs. may encroach into the public right-of-way a maximum of three feet (3') subject to approval of the Director of Public Works. Accessory Signs 1. Permanent Window Signs. Store identity, graphics, typography and/or company logo may be silkscreened or etched on the tenant's window. The maximum square foot graphic area allowed per window shall not exceed fifteen percent (15%) of the total window area from the exterior of the building, whichever is greater. Signs will not be permitted on doors. 2. Hanging Signs and Under Canopy Signs No more than one (1) hanging sign shall be allowed per tenant. Signs are permitted under a canopy and parallel to the primary street; maximum size of three (3) square feet; minimum of seven feet (7') vertical clearance shall be required from walking grade to the bottom of the sign. 3. Menu Boards. One menu board, up to four (4) square feet in area, is allowed for each restaurant or other eating establishment. Menu beards may contain only the name of the establishment and the food available inside. The menu board must be located on a wall adjacent to the main customer entrance. Harveston Specific Plan 11-69 SECTION 11.0 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 4. Daily Special Signs. One display area, up to four (4) square feet in area, is allowed for each restaurant or other eating establishment. Dally Special signs may contain only the name of the menu item. The dally special sign must be located near the entrance or hostess stand. Address Numerals All building mounted address numerals are to conform with all graphic requirements for signage, herein and the requirements of the Temecula Fire Department. Directional Signage Shall consist of small-scale signs that are compatible with the buildings architecture and wall signs. 2. Shall have contrasting background/graphic colors. 3. Shall have direct or indirect concealed illumination. Individual directional signs shall not exceed three (3) square feet in area, or have an overall height exceeding three feet (3') above finished grade. Flags A maximum of three (3) colored flags, which contain no writing, insignia or logos may be displayed at one time. Leasing and Temporary Signs Leasing, temporary, and future facilities signage shall be permitted for any office or institutional use, provided that the maximum area does not exceed sixteen (16) ~quare feet, nor shall the height of the sign exceed eight feet ('8') above finished grade. Temporary window signs shall not be illuminated, shall be limited to fifteen percent (15%) of the tenants storefront glass area, and shall be displayed for no more than fourteen (14) days. All other temporary signs shall be regulated and permitted pursuant to the City of Temecula Sign Ordinance. 3. A-flames are permitted no more than twelve (12) days per month. Theater Marquee Permanent signage for all theaters and special event facilities shall be permitted and may be provided in the form of either theater monument signs and/or marquee signs. These signs, if provided, shall consist of a permanent portion displaying the name of the theater or special event facilities and, if desired, may also include a changeable section accommodating program information. The marquee will comply with the standards for the monument sign discussed above, except the maximum area of the sign may be increased to forty (40) square feet and the width increased to ten feet (10'). Harveston Specific Plan 11-70 SECTION 11.0 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Service Commercial Signage: Guidelines and Standards A single thematic sign program for the Service Commercial development areas that dictates the design of signage must be incorporated so as to blend with the master community landscape and signage theme carried throughout the Harveston community. This sign program incorporates cohesive illumination techniques, a building coverage and monument sign guidelines to support and accentuate the monument concepts within the Landscape Architectural Guidelines. General Sign Guidelines 1. Appropriate. a. Monument signs. b. Building mounted signs for project identity. c. One color for sign lettering and one color for sign background. Additional colors are · acceptable only when incorporating logos. d. Generally, small, low key signage program for tenant spaces· e. Eye-level signs; window and door signs. f. Individual channel letters. g. Signs consistent with building texture, color and architectural style. h. Signs which have illumination sources consistent with Mount Palomar lighting standards and restrictions. 2. Inappropriate/Prohibited a. Free standing freeway-oriented signage. b. Typical "can" or "box" signs with entire face areas in plastic. c. Signs mounted above build'rog rooflines (parapet), or roof-mounted signs. d. Signs which incorporate any manner of mechanical movement, audible elements, flashing or intermittent lighting, and/or moving or otherwise animated forms. e. Signs which interfere with or conflict with any traffic control device, create a safety hazard by obstructing the clear view of pedestrian or vehicular traffic or interfere with efficient operations of emergency vehicles. f. Signs, which prevent free access to or from any fire escape, door, window or exit, or access to any standpipe. SECTION 11.0 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS g. Landscaping or the use of annual or ornamental flowers that form a sign or message. h. Illumination of signage by floodlights, lighting from unconcealed sources, sources winch do not conform with set design style. i. Absence of illumination. j. Neon window signs. k. Vehicle signs. 1. Signs extending above the eave or parapet, roof-mounted signs, non-projecting signs which project more than twelve inches (12") from a given building face. m. Signs painted onto building surfaces or trash bins and their enclosure~. n. Signs with disproportionate, visually distracting, or reflective surfaced background or graphics. o. Signs with non-contrasting background/graphics, which render the sign illegible. p. Off-site signage. q. A-frames. General Sign Standards and Specifications The area of a sign or logo with individual letters shall be measured by a rectangle around the outside of the lettering and/or the pictorial symbol. Planning and Building and Safety Departments review and approval is required prior to the placing, erecting, moving, or reconstructing of any sign within the Specific Plan area. All permanent signs shall require a permit prior to erecting or attacinng the sign. A comprehensive sign program shall be required to be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department prior to the first development in the Service Commercial area. The comprehensive sign program shall precisely implement the sign standards of the Specific Plan area. Signage which is not approved as part of the Development Plan process shall be approved administratively by the Director of Planning. Ifa situation arises that is not covered by these sign regulations or the type of permit required, the Director of Planning shall provide written interpretation after consulting the City's Sign Ordinance. All building-mounted signs shall meet or exceed all applicable city, state and federal codes. All signs containing electrical components shall conform to the Uniform Lighting Code. 2. 3. 4. Harveston Specific Plan 11-72 SECTION 11.0 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Monument Signs Signs shall be constructed with materials and colors that are compatible with, and serve to complement the building. Not more than one (I) freestanding sign shall be permitted per lot, except that if the lot has frontage on two (2) or more streets, the project shall be permitted two (2) freestanding signs, provided that the two (2) signs are not located on the same street and are not closer than ~ hundred feet (300'). A freestanding sign shall never be located within three hundred feet (300") of another freestanding sign. Freestanding signs shall refer only to the permitted uses conducted on the premises, shall be located outside the road right-of-way, shall not exceed six feet (6') in height above grade and the maximum surface area of the sign shall not exceed thirty-two (32) square feet. All monument signs shall include the address of the site. Numerals shall be no larger than ten inches (10") in height and no smaller than six inches (6") in height. A minimum of one hundred (100) square feet of landscaping of low growing shrubs, groundcover and/or armual color shall surround the base of the sign. Entry Monumentation Primary entry monumentation shall not exceed an area of one hundred (100) square feet; provided, however, that the sign shall not exceed six feet (6') in height above grade or twenty feet (20') in length. Primary entry monumentation shall identify the name of the center and shall be landscaped consistent with Section 10.3.1 item (4) of the Specific Plan. Entry monumentation letter types styles, sizes and colors shall be reviewed and approved by the City during the Development Plan review process. Primary entry monumentation shall be limited to entry points for the Service Commercial Planning Area, with a maximum of five (5) signs total (see Section 10.3.1 item (4) of the Specific Plan). Building Mounted Signs 1. General. ao Signs shall be placed to be compatible with the building and accent the architectural design of the structure. b. Sign colors should be compatible with the building's color and the building. Harveston Specific Plan 11-73 ~,,voL,*~omm~,~,~,~_~m:~c.j~.~v~ SECTION 11.0 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS c. Signs and letter sizes shall be used which are complementary to the building scale. d. Signs should have individually spaced letters. e. Signs shall have concealed illumination source, either internal or external. Maximum letter height shall not exceed forty-two inches (42") unless approved by the City during the Development Plan review process. g. All on-building fascia signage shall be coordinated with other signage within the center. 2. Wall Signs. a. The maximum number of signs shall be one per building frontage. The maximum area of signs shall be one (1) square foot for each sign area per lineal foot of building frontage. Building identification signs are only permitted if no tenant identification signs are placed on the building. 3. Tenant Window Identification. Store identity, graphics, typography and/or company logo may be silk, screened or etched on the tenant's window in white only. The maximum square foot graphic area allowed per window shall not exceed four (4) square feet or fifteen pement (15%) of the total window area from the exterior of the building, whichever is greater. Signs will not be permitted on doors. 4. Hanging Signs No more than one (1) hanging sign shall be allowed per tenant. Signs are permitted under a canopy and parallel to the primary street; maximum size of six (6) square feet; minimum of seven feet (7') vertical clearance shall be required from walking grade to the bottom of the sign. Letters shall be four inches (4") maximum in height. Accessor~ Signs 1. Menu Boards. One menu board, up to four (4) square feet in area, is allowed for each restaurant or other eating establishment. Menu boards may contain only the name of the establishment and the food available inside. The menu board must be located on a wall adjacent to the main customer entrance. 2. Dally Special Signs. One display area, up to four (4) square feet in area, is allowed for each restaurant or other eating establishment. Daily Special signs may contain only the name of the menu item. The dally special sign must be located near the entrance or hostess stand. Harveston Specific Plan 11-74 ,~0.vou*~,mx~6~cmc. j~s~ ~aw.s*o~- SECTION 11.0 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 3. Other. b. Any signage provided for Handicap parking, advertising, sales/leasing signage. Handicap parking to conform to Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) codes and requirements, as well as City requirements for appropriate graphics, color and size restrictions. c. Parking, advertising, and on-site shopping signage to be restricted per applicable City of Temecula ordinance by the Planning Department. Address Numerals All building mounted address numerals are to conform with all graphic requirements' for signage, herein and the requirements of the Temecula Fire Department. Directional Signage 1. Shall consist of small-scale versions of monument sign design and contain graphics conforming to the design for monument signs and building mounted signs. 2. Shall have conmtsfing background/graphic colors. 3. Shall have direct or indirect concealed illumination. 4. Individual directional signs shall not exceed three (3) square feet in area, or have an overall height exceeding three feet (3') above finished grade. 5. Multiple-tenant directional signs shall not exceed twelve (12) square feet in area, or have an overall height exceeding six feet (6') above finished grade. Directional signs shall be internally oriented and not located within the required street setback area. 6. Shall not contain logos. Flags A maximum of three (3) colored flags, which contain no writing, insignia or logos may be displayed at one time. Leasing and Temporary Signs I. Leasing, temporary, and future facilities signage shall be permitted for any office or institutional use, provided that the maximum area does not exceed thirty-two (32) square feet, nor shall the height of the sign exceed eight feet (8') above finished grade. Temporary window signs shall not be illuminated, shall be limited to fifteen percent (15%) of the tenants storefront glass area, and shall be displayed for no more than fourteen (14) days. All Harveston Specific Plan 11-75 SECTION 11.0 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS other temporary signs shall be regulated and permitted pursuant to the City of Temecula Sign Ordinance. 3. No A-frame signs shall be permitted in this Planning Area. Theater Marquee Permanent signage for hotels, theaters and special event facilities shall be permitted and may be provided in the form of either theater monument signs and/or marquee signs. These signs, if provided, shall consist of a permanent portion displaying the name of the hotel, theater or special event facilities and, if desired, may also include a changeable section accommodating program information. The marquee will comply with the standards for the monument sign discussed above. 11.5 EXCEPTIONS TO DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS The development standards contained herein, except lot size, setbacks and height, may be waived or modified by the Director of Planning, or an appropriate hearing body, as part of the development plan or conditional use permit process if it is determined that the standard is inappropriate for the proposed use, and that waiver or modification of the standard will not be contrary to the public health and safety. For cluster projects within the Mi, M2 and High density zoning districts, the development standards for lot sizes and setbacks may be varied by the Director of Planning as long as the cluster project falls within the allowed density ranges of the appropriate zone district. The purpose of this provision is to allow for innovative and alternative housing types around courtyards and common areas. Harveston Specific Plan 11-76 ATTACHMENT NO 4 DRAFT ORDINANCE AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP R:\S l~H~veston SPXCity CounciI\STAFFRPT 7-24-01.doc 14 Attachment No. 4 ORDINANCE NO. 01- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE ZONE CHANGE FOR THE AREA OF THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN AND AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ON PARCELS TOTALING 550 ACRES LOCATED ADJACENT TO INTERSTATE 15, NORTH OF SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK, WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD AND SOUTH OF THE NORTHERN CITY LIMIT, AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NOS. 910-261-001, 910-261-002, 910-110-013, 910-110-015, 910-110-020, 910-110- 021,910-110-027, 910-110-076, 910-100-007, 910-100-008, 910- 060-009, 910-120-003, 910-120-007, 910-120-008, 911-630-001, 911-630-002, 911-630-003, 911-640-001,911-640-002, 911-180- 002, 911-180-003, 911-180-004, 911-180-008, 911-180-009, 911- 180-015, 911-180-023 AND 911-180-028 (PLANNING APPLICATION 99-0245) NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. On July 24, 2001 the City Council adopted the Harveston Specific Plan (SP 13) as Exhibit A of this Ordinance. Exhibit A is on file in the Official Records of the City Clerk and is incorporated herein by the reference as though set forth in full. The Zoning Standards shall be applicable to the area subject to the Harveston Specific Plan. The City Council, in approving the Application, hereby makes the following findings: A. That the project as proposed and conditioned is compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community. The project has been reviewed and determined to be in conformance with the City's General Plan. These documents set policies and standards that protect the health, safety and welfare of the community. Access and circulation are adequate for emergency vehicles. The two excluded parcels not under the applicant's ownership that are located within the Specific Plan shall hereby be re-designated to become compatible with the surrounding land uses of the Harveston Specific Plan. The City hereby finds it necessary to change the Land Use Designation of the two excluded parcels to ensure the public health, safety and welfare of the City and to facilitate future development of these two parcels by removing the requirement for a separate Specific Plan. B. That the project is compatible with surrounding land uses. The project proposes similar residential neighborhoods adjacent to existing surrounding neighborhoods, with interface buffers and full roadway improvements. The limited neighborhood commercial development is proposed within a Village Center and is designed to be pedestrian oriented to serve the needs of the Harveston community. The Service Commercial is west of Ynez Road, adjacent to Interstate 15 where similar commercial and retail uses currently exist along the Interstate corridor. C. That the proposed project will not have an adverse effect on the community because it remains consistent with the goals and policies of the adopted General Plan. The project does not represent a significant change to the planned land uses for the site. RAS PXHarveston SPxCity Council~ CC Ord Zoning Map.doc 1 Section 2. Amendment to Official Zoninq Map. The Official Zoning Map for the City of Temecula is hereby amended as shown in Exhibit A of this Ordinance. Exhibit A is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full. Section 3. Environmental Compliance. The City Council of the City of Temecula has certified the Final Environmental Impact Report and adopted the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the Harveston Specific Plan in order to approve the Application. Section 4. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 24th day of July, 2001. ATTEST: Jeff Comerchero, Mayor Susan W. Jones, CMC/AAE City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTYOF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 2001 - was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 24th day of July 2001, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC/AAE City Clerk R:\S P~Harveston SPxCity Council\ CC Ord Zoning Map.doc 2 EXHIBIT A REVISED ZONING MAP R:\S PXHarveston SPxCity Council\ CC Ord Zoning Map.doc 3 City of Temecula Proposed Zoning ATI'ACHMENT NO 5 DRAFT ORDINANCE APPROVING THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT R:\S P~Harveston SP~City CounciI\STAFFRPT 7-24-01.doc 15 FOLLOWS: Attachment No. 5 ORDINANCE NO. 01- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THAT CERTAIN AGREEMENT ENTITLED "DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND LENNAR COMMUNITIES (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 99-0446)" THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES ORDAIN AS Section 1. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. Lennar Communities ("Owner") filed Planning Application No PA99-0419 (General Plan Amendment), PA99-0418 (Specific Plan, Development Code Amendment and Specific Plan Zoning Standards), PA 00-0189 (Environmental Impact Report), PA 99-0245 (Change of Zone), PA99-0446 (Development Agreement), PA00- 0295 (Tentative Tract Map 29639), PA01-0030 (Tentative Tract Map 29928), PA01-0031 (Tentative Tract Map 29929), and PA01-0032 (Tentative Tract Map No. 30088 (the "Application") in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code for land use approvals for a 550 acre planned community located adjacent to and east of Interstate 15, north of Santa Gertrudis Creek, west of Margarita Road, south of the northern City Limit ("Project"). B. Government Code Section 65864 authorizes the City to enter into binding development agreements with persons having legal or equitable interests in real property for the development of such property in order to, among other matters: ensure high quality development in accordance with comprehensive plans; provide certainty in the approval of development projects so as to avoid the waste of resources and the escalation in the cost of housing and other development to the consumer; provide assurance to the applicants for development projects that they may proceed with their projects in accordance with existing policies, rules and regulations and subject to conditions of approval, in order to strengthen the public planning process and encourage private participation in comprehensive planning and reduce the private and public economic costs of development; and provide for economic assistance to Owner for the entitlements authorizing development related improvements. C. On June 20, 2001 the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed public hearing on the Draft Environmental Impact Report, the proposed Development Agreement(s) and the other land use applications for the Project at which time all persons interested in the Draft EIR, proposed Development Agreement and the Project had the opportunity and did address the Planning Commission on these matters. R:~S P'tHarves[on SP\City Council\CC Ord for DA ,DOC 1 D. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearings and due consideration of the proposed Development Agreement and the Project, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2001-025 recommending to the City Council that the Development Agreement be approved, subject to certain recommended conditions. E. On July 24, 2001 the City Council of the City of Temecula held duly noticed public hearings on the Draft Environmental Impact Report, proposed Development Agreement(s) and the other land use applications for the Project at which time all persons interested in the proposed Development Agreement and the Project had the opportunity and did address the City Council on these matters. F. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearings before the Planning Commission and the City Council, and due consideration of the proposed Final EIR, General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Code Amendment, Specific Plan Zoning Ordinance, Tentative Tract Maps (Level A and B), and Development Agreement, the City Council adopted a resolution entitled "A Resolution of the City Council of the City Of Temecula, California, Recommending Certification of the Final Environmental Impact Report Prepared for the Harveston Specific Plan and Related Actions and Recommending Adoption of the Environmental Findings Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program in Connection therewith for the Harveston Specific Plan, Located on the North Side of Winchester Road, between Interstate 15 and Margarita Road (Planning Application 00-0189)." Section 2. and declares that: The City Council of the City of Temecula further finds, determines A. In consideration of the substantial public improvements and benefits to be provided by Owner and the Project, in further consideration of the implementation of the Harveston Specific Plan and in order to strengthen the public financing and planning process and reduce the economic costs of development, by the Development Agreement, the City intends to give Owner assurance that Owner can proceed with the development of the Project for the Term of the Development Agreement pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Development Agreement and in accordance with the City's General Plan, ordinances, policies, rules and regulations existing as set forth in the Development Agreement. In reliance on the City's covenants in the Development Agreement concerning the development of the Property, Owner has and will in the future incur substantial costs in site preparation and the construction and installation of major infrastructure and facilities in order to make the Project feasible. B. The Development Agreement and the Existing Project Approvals, as defined in the Development Agreement, implement the goals and policies of the City's General Plan, and the Harveston Specific Plan, provide balanced and diversified land uses, and impose appropriate standards and requirements with respect to land development and usage in order to maintain the overall quality of life and the environment within the City. R:~S P~Harveston SP~City Council\CC Ord for DA .DOC 2 C. The City has engaged in extensive studies and review of the potential impacts of the Project as well as the various potential benefits to the City by the development of the Project and concluded that the Project is in the best interests of and is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the City. D. The Development Agreement is consistent with the City's General Plan, and each Element thereof, and the City's Growth Management Action Plan, and constitutes a present valid exemise of the City's police power. E. The Development Agreement is being entered into pursuant to and in compliance with the requirements of Government Code Section 65867. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. Section 3. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby approves certain agreement entitled "Development Agreement by and Between the City of Temecula and Lennar Communites" and authorizes the Mayor to execute said Agreement in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit A.. Exhibit A is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full. Section 4. If any sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining provisions of this ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this ordinance and each sentence, clause or phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sentences, clauses or phrases be declared unconstitutional or otherwise invalid. Section 5. The City Clerk of the City of Temecula shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published in the manner required by law. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 24th day of July, 2001. ATTEST: Jeffrey Comemhero Mayor Susan Jones, CMC City Clerk R:~S P'~Harveston SP~City Council\CC Ord for DA .DOC 3 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss. CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 01- was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 24th day of July, 2001, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the day of ,2001 by the following vote, to wit: AYES:COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES:COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: SUSAN JONES, CMC CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter M. Thorson City Attorney R:~S l:~larveston SP\City Council\CC Ord for DA .DOC 4 EXHIBIT A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND LENNAR COMMUNITIES (LOCATED IN ATrACHMENT NO. 10 OF THIS AGENDA REPORT) R:\S P\Harveston SP\City Council\CC Ord fbr DA .DOC 5 ATrACHMENT NO 6 DRAFT RESOLUTION APPROVING rrM 29639 R:\S P~Harveston SPxCity CouncihSTAFFRPT 7-244)1.doc 16 Attachment No. 6 RESOLUTION NO. 01- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 00-0295 - TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 29639, THE SUBDIVISION OF APPROXIMATELY 550 ACRES INTO 91 LOTS WHICH CONFORM TO THE PLANNING AREAS, OPEN SPACE AREAS, SCHOOL AND PARK SITES OF THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN LOCATED EAST OF INTERSTATE 15, NORTH OF SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK, WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD AND SOUTH OF THE NORTHERN CITY LIMIT, AND FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NOS. 910-261-001,910-261-002, 910-110-013, 910-110-015, 910-110-020,910-110-021,910-110-027, 910- 110-076, 910-100-007, 910-100-008, 910-060-009, 910-120-008, 911-630- 001,911-630-002, 911-630-003, 911-640-001,911-640-002, 911-180-002, 911-180-003, 911-180-004, 911-180-008, 911-180-009, 911-180-015, 911 - 180-023 AND 911-180-028 WHEREAS, Lennar Communities filed Planning Application No. PA00-0295 (the "Application") in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan, Development Code and Subdivision Ordinance; WHEREAS, the Application was processed including, but not limited to public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application on June 20, 2001, and July 12, 2001 at duly noticed public hearings as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did, testify either in support or opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearings and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission recommended approval of the Application subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder; WHEREAS, the City Council considered the Application on July 24, 2001, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support or opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Council hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Council approved of the Application, and certified the Environmental Impact Report and adopted the Mitigation Monitoring Program after finding that the project proposed in the Application conformed to the City of Temecula General Plan; WHEREAS, all legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. by reference. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated R:\S P\Harveston SP\City Council~9639--CC RESO.DOC 1 Section 2. Findinqs. That the City Council, in approving the Application, hereby makes the following findings as required in Section 16.09.140 of the Temecula Municipal Code. A. The proposed subdivision and the design and improvements of the subdivision is consistent with the Development Code, General Plan, any applicable specific plan and the City of Temecula Municipal Code; B. The proposed subdivision map is consistent with the subject specific plan and related General Plan Amendment. C. The tentative map does not propose to divide land which is subject to a contract entered into pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965, or the land is subject to a Land Conservation Act contract but the resulting parcels following division of the land will not be too small to sustain their agricultural use; D. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development proposed by the tentative map; E. The design of the subdivisions and the proposed improvements, with conditions of approval, are not likely to cause significant environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat as no sensitive species or habitant exist within the project boundaries; F. An environmental impact report has been prepared and a finding has been made, pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081 (a) (3), finding that specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the environmental impact report; G. The design of the subdivisions and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems; H. The design of the subdivisions provides for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision to the extent feasible; I. The design of the subdivisions and the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision, or the design of the alternate easements which are substantially equivalent to those previously acquired by the public will be provided. (Quimby). The subdivisions are consistent with the City's parkland dedication requirements Section 3. Environmental Compliance, Residential projects approved under a Specific Plan are exempt from further environmental review pursuant to Section 15182 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines. All environmental impacts were previously identified and in the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) and Mitigation Monitoring Program in order to approve the project. Section 4. Conditions. The City Council of the City of Temecula approves Planning Application No. PA00-0295 (Tentative Tract Map 29639), the subdivision of approximately 550 acres into 91 lots which conform to the Planning Areas, school and park sites of the Harveston Specific Plan, subject to the project specific conditions set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference together with any and all other necessary conditions that may R:~S P~--larveston SP\City Counci1~29639--CC RESO.DOC 2 be deemed necessary, for the property located east of Interstate 15, north or Santa Gertrudis Creek, west of Margarita Road and south or the northern City limit, and further identified as Assessor Parcel Nos. 910-261-001,910-261-002, 910-110-013, 910-110-015, 910-110-020, 910-110-021,910-110- 027, 910-110-076,910-100-007, 910-100-008, 910-060-009, 910-120-008, 911-630-001,911-630- 002, 911-630-003, 911-640-001,911-640-002, 911-180-002, 911-180-003, 911-180-004, 911-180- 008, 911-180-009, 911-180-015, 911-180-023 AND 911-180-028. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 24th day of July, 2001. ATTEST: Jeff Comerchero, Mayor Susan W. Jones, CMC/AAE City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTYOF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 2001- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular t~ meeting thereof held on the 24 of July, 2001, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC/AAE City Clerk R:'vS P'~Harveston SP\City Council~9639--CC RESO.DOC 3 EXHIBIT A CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR 3'I'M 29639 R:\S P~-Iarveston SP\City Council~9639--CC RESO.DOC 4 EXHIBIT A (Attachment No. 6) CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: PA00-0295 (Tentative Tract Map No. 29639) Project Description: The subdivision of approximately 550 acres into 91 lots which conform to the Planning Areas, Open Space Areas, School and Park sites of the Harveston Specific Plan. Assessor's Parcel Nos.: 910-261-001,910-261-002, 910-110-013, 910-110- 015, 910-110-020, 910-110-021,910-110-027, 910- 110-076, 910-100-007, 910-100-008, 910-060-009, 910-120-008, 911-630-001, 911-630-002, 911-630- 003, 911-640-001, 911-640-002, 911-180-002, 911- 180-003, 911-180-004, 911-180-008, 911-180-009, 911-180-015, 911-180-023 AN D 911-180-028. Approval Date: Expiration Date: July 24, 2001 July 24, 2003 PLANNING DIVISION General Requirements The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act and to all the requirements of the Temecula Subdivision Ordinance, unless modified by the conditions listed below. A time extension may be approved in accordance with the State Map Act and City Ordinance, upon written request, if made 30 days prior to the expiration date. The permittee/applicant shall indemnify, protect and hold harmless, the City and any agency or instrumentality thereof, and/or any of its officers, employees, and agents from any and all claims, actions, or proceedings against the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its officers, employees, and agents, to attack, set aside, void, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting from an approval of the City, er any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application which action is brought within the appropriate statute of limitations period and Public Resources Code, Division 13, Chapter 4 (Section 21000 et seq., including but not by the way of limitations Section 21152 and 21167). The City shall promptly notify the permittee/applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding brought forth within this time period. The City shall estimate the cost of the defense of the action and applicant shall deposit said amount with the City. City may require additional deposits to cover anticipated costs. City shall refund, without interest, any unused portions of the deposit once the litigation is finally concluded. Should the City fail to either promptly notify or cooperate fully, permittee/applicant shall not, thereafter be R:\S PXHarveston SPXPC Docsk29639-COA.doc 1 responsible to indemnify, defend, protect, or hold harmless the City, any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its officers, employees, or agents. Should the applicant fail to timely post the required deposit, the Director may terminate the land use approval without further notice to the applicant. This project and all subsequent projects within this site shall be consistent with Specific Plan No. 13, the Harveston Specific Plan. The project and all subsequent projects within this site shall comply with all mitigation measures identified within the Final Environmental Impact Report for the Harveston Specific Plan, and the approved Mitigation Monitoring Program thereof. Once the Project Study Report (PSR) conducted by Caltrans is completed, the road alignments affecting the individual planning areas (i.e. Ynez Road and Cherry/Date Street) may be altered or modified to implement the PSR. The alternation or modification of the roads will require a revised tentative tract map ("A" Map) subject to the approval of the Director of Planning and Public Works Director. Within thirty (30) days of the final approval of the project by the City Council, the map shall be submitted to the Planning Department in final form for review and approval. The final form shall include all conditions of approval and all modifications made by the Planning Commission and City Council. The Developer shall disclose to all home buyers that Date Street is planned to be a six (6) lane urban arterial roadway and will include a freeway interchange pursuant to the City of Temecula General Plan Circulation Element. All modifications to the phasing map after the first phase of development shall not require a Specific Plan Amendment and shall be approved administratively. The approval granted by this Resolution shall become effective upon the Effective Date of the Development Agreement, as the term Effective Date is defined in the Development Agreement adopted concurrently with this Resolution. 10. Further, notwithstanding any of the conditions contained herein, Developer may seek an agreement for reimbursement for any improvements or facilities that qualify for reimbursement at such time as the City of Temecula adopts an ordinance for such reimbursement pursuant to and consistent with California Government Code Sections 66485 through 66489, inclusive, and further shall waive the same in the event of agreements, consistent with the foregoing, that require or include any or all of the terms set forth immediately above. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits 11. A copy of the Rough Grading plans shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Division. 12. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula R:\S PXHarveston SPXPC Docs\29639 COA.doc 2 Municipal Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that ordinance or by providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid. Prior to Recordation of the Final Map 13. The following shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division: a. A copy of the Final Map. b. A copy of the Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) with the following notes: i. This property is located within thirty (30) miles of Mount Palomar Observatory. All proposed outdoor lighting systems shall comply with the California Institute of Technology, Palomar Observatory recommendations, Ordinance No. 655. ii. The Harveston Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared for this project and is on file at the City of Temecula Community Development Department - Planning Division. c. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&R's) CC&R's shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director. The CC&R's shall include liability insurance and methods of maintaining open space, recreation areas, parking areas, private roads, exterior of all buildings and all landscaped and open areas including parkways. ii. No lot or dwelling unit in the development shall be sold unless a corporation, association, property owner's group or similar entity has been formed with the right to assess all properties individually owned or jointly owned which have any rights or interest in the use of the common areas and common facilities in the development, such assessment power to be sufficient to meet the expenses of such entity, and with authority to control, and the duty to maintain, all of said mutually available features of the development. Such entity shall operate under recorded CC&R's which shall include compulsory membership of all owners of lots and/or dwelling units and flexibility of assessments to meet changing costs of maintenance, repairs, and services. Recorded CC&R's shall permit enforcement by the City for provisions required as Conditions of Approval. The developer shall submit evidence of compliance with this requirement to, and receive approval of, the city prior to making any such sale. This condition shall not apply to land dedicated to the City for public purposes. iii. Every owner of a dwelling unit or lot shall own as an appurtenance to such dwelling unit or lot, either (1) an undivided interest in the common areas and facilities, or (2) a share in the corporation, or R:XS PXHarveston SP~C Docs~29639-COA.doc 3 voting membership in an association owning the common areas and facilities. Prior to Issuance of Building Permits 14. The applicant shall conduct an acoustical study to ensure acceptable interior and exterior noise standards pursuant to the General Plan noise levels for residential and commercial structures. All recommend construction techniques, improvements and/or walls recommended in the acoustical report shall be incorporated into the construction of the structures and subdivision. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Unless otherwise noted, ail conditions shall be completed by the Developer at no cost to any Government Agency. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the tentative site plan all existing and proposed easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage courses, and their omission will subject the project to further review and may require revision. GENERAL CONDITIONS 15. All utility systems such as electric, including those which provide direct service to the project site and/or currently exist along public rights-of-ways adjacent to the site (except electrical lines rated 33 kv or greater), gas, telephone, water, sewer, and cable TV shall be placed underground, with easements provided as required, and designed and constructed in accordance with City Codes and the utility provider. 16. Prior to the issuance of any grading permit, as deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall consult with the State of California Department of Fish and Game, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to determine if permits or approvals are necessary from such agencies for any action contemplated by this proposal. Such consultation shall be in writing, and copies of said correspondence, including responses from agencies, shall be submitted to the City. Where appropriate, the terms, conditions, and recommendations of the noted agencies shall be incorporated as Conditions of Approval into the areas of development. 17. All easements and/or right-of-way dedications shall be offered for dedication to the public or other appropriate agency and shall continue in force until the City accepts or abandons such offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the Department of Public Works. 18. Landscaping and permanent irrigation facilities shall be installed with all street improvements on and off-site grading. Perimeter walls, where required, shall be treated with graffiti-resistant coating and shall be installed adjacent to street improvements within each phase. A phasing plan addressing the schedule of necessary infrastructure requirements shall be approved by the Department of Public Works and the Planning Director prior to approval of any subsequent application. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal 19. 20. R:\S P~Harveston SF~PC Docs~29639-COA.doc 4 Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06 unless otherwise provided for by a written agreement between the City and the Developer. 21. The Developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required real properly interests necessary to carry out these conditions, and if he or she should fail to do so, the Developer shall, prior to submittal of the Final Map for recordation, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act, Section 66462 and Section 66462.5. Such agreement shall provide for payment by the Developer of all costs incurred by the City to acquire the real property interests required in connection with the subdivision. Security of a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the Developer, at the Developer's cost. The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal. CIRCULATION 22. Prior to Final Map recordation, the Developer is responsible to bond for or construct the traffic signals at the project's accesses, as required, including the associated street improvements, based on traffic signal warrants analysis relative to subsequent tentative maps and/or development applications. 23. Adequate primary and secondary access shall be provided for each phase of development as approved by the Department of Public Works. Access to office and commercial areas shall be reviewed by the Department of Public Works at the time of submittal of individual tentative maps and/or development applications. Additional rights-of-way at entries to the aforementioned sites may be required to provide for turning lanes as directed by the Department of Public Works. 24. The exact location and number of access points shall be subject to review and approval by the Department of Public Works upon future tentative map and/or development plan approvals. 25. All street sections shall correspond with Typical Roadway Cross Sections and requirements of the Circulation Element of City's General Plan, City ordinances and standards or as approved with the Harveston Specific Plan. All intersection intervals shall comply with City standards and requirements. The Developer shall provide bus bays and shelters within the Specific Plan. Location and number of bus bays shall be subject to approval of the City and Riverside Transportation Agency (RTA). Additional rights-of-way dedications associated with bus bays shall be provided by the Developer. Necessary improvements have been/will be conditioned based on the project traffic studies and the conceptual phasing plan shown on Harveston Cherry Alternative, Revised Proposed Phasing (8/12"Xl1") 4/23/01. Any substantive rephasing of the development must be approved by the Planning and Public Works Director through a rephasing application. Prior to the issuance of occupancy permits within any phase, all on and offsite improvements as referred to in the Traffic Reports and subsequent addenda along with additional requirements set herein, or as set by conditions on individual tracts, must be constructed and/or bonded as required by the Department of Public Works. 26. 27. 28. R:\S PXHarveston SP~PC Docs\29639-COA.doc 5 29. Ensuing Traffic Reports, analyzing traffic impacts associated with subsequent development stages of Tentative Tract 29639, shalt be submitted to identify implementation and timing of the necessary improvements to mitigate cumulative traffic impacts. TRAFFIC MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM 30. The Traffic Mitigation Monitoring Program proposes that a traffic study be approved prior to the issuance of first occupancy permit in each additional phases of the development. The intent of the Traffic Mitigation Monitoring Program is not to re-define mitigation responsibility, but rather to assist in the refinement of area improvement needs and the timing of the improvements. The traffic study would: 1) document ambient traffic volumes conditions; 2) estimate trip generation for the particular development phase; and 3) assess traffic conditions with the traffic added by the particular development phase. The exact study area to be addressed in each of the traffic studies should be defined through discussions with the City Traffic Engineer. In general the study area should include the immediate access intersections and roadways, which would serve the new development phase and those critical off-site intersections and roadways that will provide primary access to the new development. Critical intersections / roadways are defined as those facilities that are experiencing high levels of peak period traffic congestion (at the time the traffic study is to be performed). The traffic study findings would assist the City in proactively planning for area roadway improvements. DRAINAGE 31. Drainage and flood control facilities shaJl be provided in accordance with the requirements of the City and/or Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (RCFC&WCD). Prior to approval of any subsequent development applications, the Developer shall submit the master drainage plan to the City and RCFC&WCD to review the adequacy of the proposed and existing downstream drainage facilities. 33. Drainage facilities within each phase shall be constructed immediately after or concurrently with the completion of the site grading and prior to or concurrently with the initial site development within that phase. 34. All drainage facilities shall be designed to convey 100-year storm flows, subject to the approval of the Department of Public Works and RCFC&WCD, as applicable. The Developer shall construct the proposed on and offsite drainage facility improvements and the interim detention basin provision as recommended in the Specific Plan and Drainage Study documents and/or as directed by the Department of Public Works and RCFC&WCD, as applicable. As required by the Department of Public Works, additional Hydrology and Hydraulic Reports shall be submitted with subsequent tentative maps and/or development applications to study the drainage impacts and analyze necessary measures to mitigate the runoff created as part of the development of this project. The Developer shall accept and properly dispose of all off-site drainage flowing onto or through the site. 35. 36. 37. R:\S P~Harveston SP~PC Docs~29639-COA.doc 6 38. The Developer shall protect downstream properties from damages caused by alteration of the drainage patterns; i.e., concentration or diversion of flow. Protection shall be provided by constructing adequate drainage facilities, including enlarging existing facilities or by securing drainage easements. WATER AND SEWER 39. Water and sewer facilities shall be installed in accordance with the requirements and specifications of the City, Rancho California Water District (RCWD), and Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD). Such requirements shall be applied at the subdivision or plot plan stages of the development. 40. Prior to the approval of subsequent development applications, the Developer shall submit the master water plan to RCWD to check for adequacy of the proposed water facilities. The Developer shall obtain written approval for the water system from RCWD. 41. Prior to the approval of subsequent development applications, the Developer shall submit the master sewer plan to EMWD to check for adequacy of the proposed sewer facilities. The Developer shall obtain written approval for the sewer system from EMWD. GRADING 42. No grading shall be permitted for any development area prior to tentative map or plot plan approval and issuance of grading permits for the specific area of development. 43. Grading plans and operations shall be in accordance with the California Building Code, City Grading Standards, the recommendations contained in the Geotechnical Report, or any subsequent reports prepared for the project, the conditions of the grading permit, and accepted grading construction practices and the recommendations and standards specified in the Specific Plan and Environmental Impact Report (EIR) document. 44. Prior to issuance of any grading permit, erosion control plans shall be prepared in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works. The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and erosion control improvements. The Developer shall comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit regulated by the State Water Resources Control Board, and the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) implemented by the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board. Each subsequent application for a phase of development shall include a conceptual grading plan to indicate at a minimum: a. Preliminary quantity estimates for grading. b. Techniques and methods which will be used to prevent erosion and sedimentation during and after the grading process in compliance with the City Standards and NPDES requirements. c. Preliminary pad and roadway elevations. d. Designation of the borrow or stockpile site location for import/export material. 45. 46. R:\S PXHarveston S~PCDocs\29639 COA.doc 7 e. Approximate time frames for development including the identification of areas which will be graded during the rainy months. f. Temporary and permanent storm drain systems to safely convey storm flows through the site and prevent damage to adjacent property. 47. Major grading activities shall be scheduled during the dry season wherever possible, or as otherwise approved by the Department of Public Works. 48. Soils stabilization, which may include revegetation of graded areas, shall occur within 30 days of completion of grading activities as directed by the Department of Public Works. 49. The site shall be watered during grading operations to control dust. 50. Temporary drainage and sediment control devices shall be installed as directed by the Department of Public Works. 51. An import/export route shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works prior to issuance of any grading permit. The plan shall include limitation to the duration of the grading operation and construction activities, a Traffic Control Plan, and a daily time schedule of operations. 52. Prior to issuance of any grading permit, a soils reports shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval, to address engineering, geologic, seismic, and soils engineering concerns for each tentative map or commercial parcel map for each phase of proposed development. 53. A Geotechnical Report shall be prepared by a registered engineer or engineering geologist and submitted to the Department of public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address special study zones and identify any geotechnical hazards for the site including location of faults and potential for liquefaction. The report shall include recommendations to mitigate the impact of ground shaking and liquefaction. 54. All public streets shall be maintained and cleaned if necessary on a daily basis during grading operation and construction activities. Cash deposit, letter of credit or posting of bond to guarantee maintenance of all public rights-of-way affected by the grading operations and construction activities, shall be posted prior to issuance of grading permits. 55. If subsequent Geotechnical and Soils Reports determine that dewatering of the site is necessary during construction, necessary permits (ie. in compliance with NPDES permit) shall be obtained from appropriate agencies prior to approval of the grading plans. PHASING 56. Construction of the development permitted by Tentative Tract 29639, including recordation of final subdivision maps, may be carried out in stages provided that, adequate vehicular access is constructed for all dwelling units in each stage of development and further provided that such development conforms substantially with the intent and purpose of the Tentative Tract 29639 Phasing Plan. 57. Development applications shall be submitted for each planning unit in each phase. Total acreage and land uses within each phase shall be substantially in accordance with the specifications of the Specific Plan. R:~S ?XHarveston SPM'C Docs\29639-COA.doc 8 58. A fair share program to reimburse the Developer for oversized improvements as specified by the EIR's allocation of fair share responsibility may be established to the satisfaction of the City and developer consistent with any of the methods authorized by the provisions of California Government Code Section 66485 through 66489. 59. PHASE 1 a. CIRCULATION The following improvements shall be completed as part of Phase 1 and prior to first building permit in Phase 2. i. Improve Date Street from Margarita Road to the Major Entry at Date Street (Urban Arterial Highway Standards - 134' R,NV) to include dedication of half-width street right-of-way, installation of half-width street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer), and a 14 foot wide raised landscaped median ii. Improve the Major Entry at Date Street from Date Street to Loop Road (Modified Major Highway Standards - 100' R/VV) to include dedication of full-width right-of-way, installation of full-width street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer) and a 14 foot wide raised landscaped median iii. Improve the Loop Road from Major Entry at Date Street to the School Site (Modified Collector Road Standards - 66' R/VV) to include dedication of full-width right-of-way, installation of full- width street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer) iv. Improve northbound Margarita Road from Santa Gertrudis Creek to the southerly boundary of Tract Map No. 21340 (Arterial Highway Standards - 110' R/W) to include installation of half-width street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer), and a 14 foot wide raised landscaped median. b. CIRCULATION The following improvements shall be completed prior to the first occupancy permit in Phase 1 i. Improve the Loop Road from the Major Entry at Margarita Road to the westerly boundary of Planning Area 5 (Modified Collector Road Standards - 66' R/W) to include dedication of full-width right- of-way, installation of full-width street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer) R:\S l~Harveston SPxPC Docs~29639-COA.doc 9 (1) Provide an Eastbound Free Right Turn Lane from the Loop Road onto the Major Entry at Margarita Road ii. Improve Southbound Margarita Road from Santa Gertrudis Creek to Date Street (Arterial Highway Standards - 110' RNV) to include dedication of half-width street right-of-way, installation of half- width street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer), and a 14 foot wide raised landscaped median. iii. Improve the Major Entry at Margarita Road from Margarita Road to Loop Road (Modified Street Section per the Specific Plan - 106' RNV) to include dedication of full-width right-of-way, installation of full-width street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer), and a 20 foot wide raised landscaped median iv. Improve the Minor Entry at Margarita Road from Margarita Road to Loop Road (Modified Street Section per the Specific Plan - 82' R/W) to include dedication of full-width right-of-way, installation of full-width street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer) v. Improve the Village Center Road from the Loop Road to the Major Entry at Margarita Road (Modified Street Section per the Specific Plan - 63' R/VV) to include dedication of full-width right-of-way, installation of full-width street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer) The following improvements shall be completed prior to the first occupancy permit in Phase 1 of the Service Commercial area: vi. Improve Ynez Road from the southerly Specific Plan boundary to Date (Arterial Highway Standards 110' R/VV) to include dedication of half-width street right-of-way, installation of half- width street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer), and a 14 foot wide raised landscaped median. On or before January 1, 2003 the Developer shall reserve for the City's use or commitment to use the same for freeway interchange and/or freeway-related traffic circulation purposes, a component of real property that is: vii. (i) approximately twenty (20) contiguous acres in area; (ii) identified and defined by the City Engineer of Temecula; City of R:~S PXHarveston SP~PC Docs~29639-COA.doc 10 reserved for a twenty (20) year period for the purpose of offering a permanent dedication for freeway related purposes to the City of Temecula if and when the City represents to Developer that a freeway interchange is to be constructed on the burdened property. Any portion of the Reserved real property shall be released from the reservation at the time the City determines such real property is not necessary for the freeway improvements. "Reservation" shall mean the Owner an/or Developer of the subject real property shall not improve the real property but shall instead maintain the property in a non-nuisance condition and in an undeveloped/unimproved state during the term of the Reservation. The Owner or Developer shall submit an enforceable written instrument so burdening the subject real property for the review and approval of the City Attorney and Director of Public Works prior to, and have the same approved, in such time so as to allow the Reservation to be enforceable on or before January 1, 2003. OFFSITE CIRCULATION Prior to issuance of 326th occupancy permit for the Phase 1 Residential and more than 8 acres of Phase 1 Service Commercial development (southern portion of Planning Area 12), the developer(s) shall implement the improvements for the following, subject to reimbursement as provided in Condition 58 above unless waived as provided in Condition 10 above: i. Improve the intersection of Winchester Road at Ynez Road 1. Add Eastbound Through Lane 2. Add Southbound Right Turn Overlap Phase 3. Modify Signal to Provide Northbound Right Turn Overlap Phase ii. Improve the intersection of Winchester Road at Margarita Road 1. Add Right Turn Lane and Modify Signal to Provide Southbound Right Turn Overlap Phase 2. Add Eastbound Left Turn Lane (Dual Left) TRAFFIC SIGNALS Prior to the first occupancy permit or as warranted, the developer shall install a traffic signal with conduits for future interconnect at the following intersections: 2. 3. 4. Margarita Road and Major Entry at Margarita Road Major Entry at Margarita Road and Loop Road Margarita Road and Date Street Date Street and Major Entry at Date Street R:\S PXHarveston SP~C Docs~29639-COA.doc 5. Modify the existing traffic signal at the intersection of Margarita Road and Rustic Glen Drive DRAINAGE i. Construct backbone channel and/or drainage facilities and all associated improvements per Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District and the City of Temecula standards WATER AND SEWER i. Install water mains per Rancho California Water District requirements and sewer mains per Eastern Municipal Water District requirements PHASE2 a, CIRCULATION The following improvements shall be completed as part of Phase 2 and prior to first building permit in Phase 3. i. Improve Date Street from the Major Entry at Date Street to the Loop Road west of Ynez Road (Urban Arterial Highway Standards - 134' R/VV) to include dedication of full-width street right-of-way, installation of half-width street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer), and a 14 foot wide raised landscaped median ii. iii. 1. Provide Eastbound Right Turn Lane onto Ynez Road per EIR iD. No. 32 2. Provide Westbound Right Turn Lane onto Ynez Road per EIR ID. No. 32 Improve the Loop Road from Major Entry at Date Street to the westerly boundary of Planning Area 5 (Modified Collector Road Standards - 66' R/VV) to include dedication of full-width right-of- way, installation of full-width street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer) Improve Ynez Road from the south tract boundary to the north tract boundary (Arterial Highway Standards - 110' R/W) to include dedication of full-width right-of-way, installation of full-width street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer)and a 14 foot wide raised landscaped median. 1. Provide Southbound Right Turn Lane onto Date Street per EIR ID. No. 37 2. Provide Northbound Right Turn Lane onto Date Street per EIR ID. No. 37 R:\S I>~ltap,,eston S[~PC Docs~29639-COA doc iv On or before January 1,2003 the Developer shall reserve for the City's use or commitment to use the same for freeway interchange and /or freeway-related traffic circulation purposes, a component of real property that is: (a) approximately twenty (20) contiguous acres in area; (b) identified and defined by the City Engineer of City of Temecula; (c) reserved for a twenty (20) year period for the purpose of offering a permanent dedication for freeway related purposes to the City of Temecula if and when the City represents to Developer that a freeway interchange is to be constructed on the burdened property. Any portion of the Reserved real property shall be released from the reservation at the time the City determines such real property is not necessary for the freeway improvements. "Reservation" shall mean the Owner an/or Developer of the subject real property shall not improve the real property but shall instead maintain the property in a non-nuisance condition and in an undeveloped/unimproved state during the term of the Reservation. The Owner or Developer shall submit an enforceable written instrument so burdening the subject real property for the review and approval of the City Attorney and Director of Public Works prior to, and have the same approved, in such time so as to allow the Reservation to be enforceable on or before January 1,2003. Improve Equity Drive from County Center Drive to the new Ynez Road (Modified Principal Collector Road Standards - 78' RNV) to include to include dedication of full-width right-of-way, installation of full-width street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer) OFFSITE CIRCULATION Prior to the issuance of occupancy permits for the Phase II build-out of Residential (i.e., beyond 476 single family units and 346 multi-family units) and Service Commercial (i.e., beyond 8,000 square feet), the developer(s) shall improve the intersections below, subject to reimbursement as provided in Condition 58 above unless waived as provided in Condition 10 above: i. Winchester Road at Jefferson Avenue 1. Add Eastbound Right Turn Lane 2. Add a Southbound Left Turn Lane (Dual Left) R:\S PXHarveston SP~PC Docs~29639-COA.doc 13 ii. iV. vi. vii. 3. Convert Southbound Right Turn Lane to Shared Through and Right Turn Lane 4. Add Northbound Right Turn Lane (Dual Right) Winchester Road at 1-15 Southbound Ramp 1. Add Eastbound Right Turn Lane 2. Add Southbound dedicated Left Turn Lane (Dual Left) and Widen Off Ramp to Accommodate the Added Lane Winchester Road at Ynez Road 1. Add Eastbound Left Turn Lane (Dual Left) 2. · Add Eastbound Through Lane 3. Add Northbound Left Turn Lane (Triple Left) 4. Modify Signal to Provide Northbound Right Turn Overlap Phase 5. Split Northbound and Southbound Signal Phases 6. Add Westbound Through Lane 7. Add Southbound Shared Through and Right Turn Lane (300' Minimum) Overland Drive at Jefferson Avenue 1. Modify Signal to Provide Westbound Right Turn Overlap Phase 2. Modify Signal to Provide Northbound Right Turn Overlap Phase 3. Split Northbound and Southbound Signal Phases 4. Add Eastbound Right Turn Lane Overland Drive at Ynez Road 1. Add Westbound Right Turn Lane 2. Modify Westbound Shared Through and Right Turn Lane to Through Lane 3. Modify Signal to Provide Westbound Right Turn Overlap Phase 4. Modify Signal to Provide Southbound Right Turn Overlap Phase Overland Drive at Margarita Road 1. Modify Northbound Through Lane to Shared Through and Left Turn Lane 2. Split Northbound and Southbound Signal Phases Winchester Road at i-15 Northbound Ramp 1. Add Westbound right turn lane (Dual right) R:\S PXHarveston SPXPC Docs\29639-COA.doc CITY OF MURRIETA CIRCULATION A fair-share contribution shall be made to the City of Murrieta prior to the first occupancy permit in Phase 2 to improve the intersection of: i. Murrieta Hot Springs Road at Jefferson Avenue 1. Add Westbound Left Turn Lane (Dual Left) 2. Channelize Northbound Right Turn Lane to Allow Free Right Turn Movement ii. Murrieta Hot Springs Road at Alta Murrieta Drive 1. Add Westbound Right Turn Lane 2. Modify Westbound Shared Through and Right Turn Lane to Right Turn Only Lane iii. Murrieta Hot Springs Road at Margarita Road 1. Modify Eastbound Through Lane to Shared Through Lane/Right Turn Lane 2. Modify Northbound Through Lane to Shared Through Lane/Left Turn Lane TRAFFIC SIGNALS i. Prior to the first occupancy permit, or as warranted, the developer shall install a traffic signal with conduits for future interconnect at the following intersections: 1. Date Street and Major Entry at Date Street DRAINAGE i. Construct backbone channel and/or drainage facilities and all associated improvements per Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District and the City of Temecula requirements. WATER AND SEWER Install water mains per Rancho California Water District requirements and sewer mains per Eastern Municipal Water District requirements: PHASE3 a. CIRCULATION The following improvements shall be completed as part of Phase 3 i. Improve Date Street from the Loop Road west of Ynez Road to west tract boundary (Urban Arterial Highway Standards - 134' R/VV) to include dedication of full-width street right-of-way, installation of full-width street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and R:\S P~Harveston SP~PC Docs~29639-COA.doc 15 ii. striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer), and a 14 foot wide raised landscaped median 1. Provide Eastbound Right Turn Lane onto Ynez Road per EIR ID. No. 32 2. Provide Westbound Right Turn Lane onto Ynez Road per EIR ID. No. 32 On or before January 1, 2003 the Developer shall reserve for the City's use or commitment to use the same for freeway interchange and /or freeway-related traffic circulation purposes, a component of real property that is: (a) (b) (c) approximately twenty (20) contiguous acres in area; identified and defined by the City Engineer of City of Temecula; reserved for a twenty (20) year period for the purpose of offering a permanent dedication for freeway related purposes to the City of Temecula if and when the City represents to Developer that a freeway interchange is to be constructed on the burdened property. Any portion of the Reserved real property shall be released from the reservation at the time the City determines such real property is not necessary for the freeway improvements. "Reservation" shall mean the Owner an/or Developer of the subject real property shall not improve the real property but shall instead maintain the property in a non-nuisance condition and in an undeveloped/unimproved state during the term of the Reservation. The Owner or Developer shall submit an enforceable written instrument so burdening the subject real property for the review and approval of the City Attorney and Director of Public Works prior to, and have the same approved, in such time so as to allow the Reservation to be enforceable on or before January 1, 2003. TRAFFIC SIGNALS Prior to the first occupancy permit in Phase 3 or as warranted, the developer shall install a traffic signal with conduits for future interconnect at the following intersection: 1. Date Street and Ynez Road DRAINAGE i. Construct backbone channel and/or drainage facilities and all associated improvements per Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District and the City of Temecula requirements. R:\S PxHarveston SPxPC Docs~29639-COA.doc WATER AND SEWER Install water mains per Rancho California Water District requirements and sewer mains per Eastern Municipal Water District requirements. COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT General Requirements: 60. If any of the following conditions of approval differ from the Specific Plan text or exhibits, the conditions enumerated herein shall take precedent. 61. The current park dedication requirement (Quimby) shall be satisfied with the 16.5 acre community park (Lot 53), the existing Winchester Creek Park and the HOA owned and maintained recreational areas identified in the Harveston Specific Plan including the 6.9 acre Lake Park (Lots 33, 34 and 37), the 1.8 acre Village Green (Lot 35), the 2 acre Village Club (Lot 36) and the mini parks totaling 1.5 acres. 62. The actual design of the 16.5 acre community park (Lot 53) shall be in substantial conformance with the conceptual designs and guidelines identified within the Specific Plan. Prior to submittal of construction plans, the developer shall meet with the Director of Community Services to determine the location and specifications of the park amenities to be provided on site. Construction plans and specifications must be approved by the Director of Community Services. 63. All park and slope/landscape plans submitted for consideration shall be in conformance with the City of Temecula Landscape and Irrigation Specifications and Installation Details and the Park Land and Landscape Dedication Process. 64. The design of the community park (Lot 53) shall provide for pedestrian circulation and access for the disabled throughout the park. 65. Construction of the 16.5 acre community park site and proposed TCSD landscape maintenance areas shall commence pursuant to a pre-job meeting with the developer and TCSD Maintenance Superintendent. Failure to comply with the TCSD review and inspection process may preclude acceptance of these areas into the TCSD maintenance programs. 66. The developer, the developer's successor or assignee, shall be responsible for all maintenance of the park sites and slopes/landscaping areas until such time as those responsibilities are accepted by the TCSD. 67. The 16.5 acre community park shall be improved and dedicated to the City free and clear of any liens, assessment fees, or easements that would preclude the City from utilizing the property for public purposes. A policy of title insurance and a soils assessment report shall also be provided with the conveyance of the property. 68. All perimeter slope/landscape areas adjacent to roadways with a 66 foot right of way or larger adjacent to single family residential development shall be offered for dedication to the TCSD for maintenance purposes following compliance to existing City standards and completion of the application process. All other landscape areas, entry monumentation, signage, pedestrian portals, bus shelters R:\S 1:SHarveston SPXPC Docs\29639-COA.doc and walls shall be maintained by the Homeowners Association (HCA), private maintenance association or property owner. 69. A ten (10) foot wide multi-use trail will be constructed around the Lake Park (Lots 33, 34 and 37). An 8' paseo will be constructed within the Paseo Park (Lot 31) and along the outside of the Loop Road. 70. The developer shall dedicate a fifteen (15) foot easement for a multi-use trail along the northerly edge of Lot 47, 48 and 49 between 1-15 and Ynez Road. 71. Class II bicycle lanes will be included on both sides of Ynez Road, Date Street (within the project area), the Loop Road and the three entrance roads, and the adjacent portions of Margarita Road and Date Street (bordering the County line). Class II bike lanes shall be constructed in concurrence with the street improvements. 72. The developer is entitled to receive a credit against the park component of the City's Development Impact Fee (DIF) based upon the actual cost of improving the community park (Lot 53). The fee/credit issue shall be addressed pursuant to the execution of a Development Agreement or a Park Improvement Agreement between the applicant and the City prior to approval of the final map. 73. The 16.5-acre community park in Planning Area 1 shall be constructed, including the 90-day maintenance and establishment period, and the conveyance accepted by the City Council prior to the issuance of the first residential building permit in Phase 2 (excluding mode[s). Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the completion of the 16.5 acre Community Park is delayed because the final and permanent alignment of Ynez Road has not been determined which prevents the designation of the boundaries of the subject park, the City may, in the reasonable discretion of the City Manager and which shall not be unreasonably withheld, continue to issue building permits during the term of such uncertainty. The City Manager may require, and the Owner or Developer shall provide, the provision of notice to potential purchasers of the scope of improvements intended to occur within the subject park, including, but not limited to, lighted athletic fields. Notice, as required by the City Manager, may include, but is not limited to, signage (both on and off the anticipated park site), letters, displays or handbills. Prior to Approval of the Final Map: 74. The developer, or his assignee, shall offer for dedication, enter into an agreement and post security with the TCSD to improve the proposed parkland located in Planning Area 1 in accordance with the City standards, prior to the approval of the respective final map. 75. All areas intended for dedication to the TCSD for maintenance shall be identified on each final map by numbered lots and indexed to identify said lots numbers as a proposed TCSD maintenance areas. 76. Arl TCSD slope/landscaping maintenance easements shall be offered for dedication on each final map. R:\S PXHarveston SPYPC Docs~29639-COA.doc 18 77. Construction drawings for all landscape medians and proposed TCSD slope/landscape maintenance areas shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Services prior to the approval of each final map. 78. The subdivider shall post security and enter into an agreement to improve ail landscape medians and proposed TCSD maintenance areas prior to the approval of each final map. 79. The developer shall file a notice of intention with the Temecula Community Services District to initiate election proceedings for acceptance of residential street lights and perimeter slope/landscape into the TCSD maintenance program prior to approval of each final map. All costs associated with this process shall be borne by the developer. Prior to Issuance of Building Permits: 80. Prior to the installation of street lights or issuance of building permits, whichever comes first, the developer shall file an application and pay the appropriate fees to the TCSD for the dedication of arterial and residential street lights into the appropriate TCSD maintenance program. Prior to Issuance of Certificates of Occupancy: 81. Prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy within each phase map, the developer shall submit the most current list of Assessor's Parcel Numbers assigned to the final project. 82. It shall be the developer's responsibility to provide written disclosure of the existence or TCSD and its service level rates and charges to all prospective purchasers. FIRE DEPARTMENT 83. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in force at the time of building plan submittal. 84. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for residential land division per CFC Appendix III.A, Table A-III-A-I. The developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 1500 GPM at 20- PSI residual operating pressure with a 2-hour duration. The required fire flow may be adjusted during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire Flow as given above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC 903.2, Appendix Ill-A) 85. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC Appendix III.B, Table A-III-B-1. Standard fire hydrants (6" x 4" x 2 1/2" outlets) shall be located on Fire Department access roads and adjacent public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 500 feet apart, at each intersection and shall R:\S IAHarveston SPSPC Docs\29639-COA doc 19 86. 87. 88. 89. 90. 91. 92. 93. be located no more than 250 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required. (CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix Ill-B) 94. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for commercial land division per CFC Appendix Ill-A, Table A-III-A-1. The developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 4000 GPM at 20- PSI residual operating pressure with a 4 hour duration. The required fire flow may be adjusted during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire Flow as given above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC 903.2, Appendix Ill-A) The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC Appendix Ill-B, Table A-III-B-1. Super fire hydrants (6" x 4" x 2-2 1/2" outlets) shall be located on Fire Department access roads and adjacent public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 350 feet apart, at each intersection and shall be located no more than 210 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required. (CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix Ill-B) Maximum cul-de-sac length shall not exceed 1320 feet. Minimum turning radius on any cul-de-sac shall be thirty-seven (37) feet for residential and forty-five (45) feet for commercial. (CFC 902.2.2.3, CFC 902.2.2.4) If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection prior to any building construction. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2) Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent roads are installed. Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface for 80,000 lbs. GVW. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2) Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved Fire Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or any portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface designed for 80,000 lbs. GVVV with a minimum AC thickness of .25 feet. (CFC sec 902) Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have a clear paved section of thirty- six (36) feet and an unobstructed vedical clearance of not less than thirteen (13) feet six (6) inches. (CFC 902.2.2.1) Private roads and alleys may be as narrow as 20 feet unobstructed travel width, not including any parking with Fire Prevention approval on a map by map basis. On this map these are approved where homes also face a public road. Prior to building construction, dead end road ways and streets in excess of one hundred and fifty (150) feet which have not been completed shall have a R:\S PXHarveston SP~PC Docs~29639-COA.doc 20 turnaround capable of accommodating fire apparatus. (CFC 902.2.2.4) 95. Prior to building construction, this development and any street within serving more than 35 homes or any commercial developments shall have two (2) points of access, via all-weather surface roads, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 902.2.1) Where phasing affects planned road connections temporary construction roads may serve as the second point of access. 96. Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall be: signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature block; and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. After the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be presented to the Fire Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system including fire hydrants shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building materials being placed on an individual lot. (CFC 8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and National Fire Protection Association 24 1-4.1) 97. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective Markers" shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations. (CFC 901.4.3) 98. All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry system for emergency access by firefighting personnel. (CFC 902.4) Special Conditions 99. Prior to construction of roads a simple map in an electronic file of the .DWG format must be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau. Alternative file formats may be acceptable, contact fire prevention for approval. OTHER AGENCIES 100. Flood protection shall be provided in accordance with the Riverside County Flood Control District's transmittal dated August 18, 2000, a copy of which is attached. The fee is made payable to the Riverside County Flood Control Water District by either a cashier's check or money order, prior to the issuance of a grading permit (unless deferred to a later date by the District), based upon the prevailing area drainage plan fee. 101. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the County of Eastern Information Center, U.C. Riverside dated August 9, 2000, a copy of which is attached. 102. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Riverside Transit Agency transmittal dated May 31, 2001, a copy of which is attached. R:~S P~Harveston SP'~PC Docsk2.9639-COA.doc By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be subject to Community Development Department approval. Applicant Signature R:\S P\Harveston SI~PC Docs\29639-COA doc 22 DAVID P. ZAPPE General Manager-Chief Engineer AND WA 'ER ¢ONSE} VA 'IO I)ISTPd City of Temecula Planning Department Post Office Box 9033 Temecula, California 92589-9033 Attention: ~,~'T'T~ A['~'~-~' / Ladies and Gentlemen: 1995 MARKET STREET PdVERSIDE, CA 92501 909/955-1200 909/788-9965 FAX 51180.1 he D~stnct does not normally recommend conditions for land divisions or other land use cases ~n ncor cities The District also does not an check d .... ' ' porated _ - ...... ,o _ i.t!/land use cases, or pmwde State Dry,sion of Real Estate letters or omar T~ooo nazaro repor[s rot sucncases, uismct comments/recommendations for such cases are normally limited to items of specific interest to the D strict including District Master Drainage Plan facilities, other re ional flood con, tr_o a. qd. d. rainaE, e facilitie_s, whi.ch co.u. d b9 consi.dered a logical componenf'or extension of a master ~)~l~n s stem, ano utstnct Area urainage vlan Tees (aevelopment mitigation fees). In addition, information of a general nS~¥uSre is .... provided. - ............ The District has not rev awed the proposed project in detail and the following checked comments do not in any way constitute or imply D stdct approval or endorsement of the proposed project w th respect to flood hazard, public hea th and safety or any other such issue V/' This prgject would not be impacted by District Master Drainage Plan facilities nor are other facilities of regional ~nterest proposed. This project involves Distdct Master Plan facilities· The Distdct will accept ownership of such facilities on written request of the City. Fac t es must be constructed to Distdct standards, and District plan check and inspection will be required for District acceptance. Plan check, inspection and administrative fees wil be required This project proposes channels storm drains 36 nches or larger in diameter, or other facilities that could be considered regional in nature and/or a logical extension of the adopted Master Drainage Plan. The District wou d consider accepting ownership of such tacilities on written request of the City. Facilities must be constructed to District standards, and D~stdct plan check and inspection will be required for Distdct acceptance. Plan check, inspection and administrative fees will be requir6d. , v// T~his. projec_.t, is I.ocate, d within the limits of the District's qramage v-'lan mr wn ch drainage fees have been adontea' cneck or money order only to the Flood Control District prior ~'(~ issuance ot'Pl~uilding or grading permits whichever comes first. Fees to be paid should be at the rate in effect at the time of issuance ofth~ actual permit. GENERAL INFORMATION This project may require a National Po utant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resoumes Con[roi Board. Clearance for grading, recordation or other final approva/should not be given until the City has determined that the project has been granted a perm t or is shown to be exempt. - If this project involves a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)mapped flood plain, then the Ci should require the applicant to provide all studies, calculations, plans and other ~nformation required to me~ FEMA requirements, and should further require that the applicant obtain a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) pdor to grading, recordation or other final approval of the project, and a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) pdor to occupancy. If a natural watercourse or mapped flood plain is impacted by this project, the City should require the applicant to obtain a Section 1601/1603 Agreement from the California Department of F sh and Game and a Clean Water Act Section 404 Perm t from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, or written correspondence from these agencies indicating the project is exempt from these requirements. A Clean Water Act Section 401 Water Quality Cert~cation may be required from the ocal California Regional Water Quality Control Board prior to issuance of the Co s 404 permit, rp 5kr , Very truly yours, STUART E. MCKIBBIN Senior Civil Engineer Date: ,/~ ~ [('~ ~ ~,ESOURCES iNFORMATION ~YSTEM [~ednesday August 9, 1900 4:19p~ -- From '909 7h-~',TM -- Page ~ALIFORNIA ~ HISTORICAL ~ Unk~'~[y ~ Ca~enm Riv~, CA 925214)418 Phene (gee) 787-S74S Fax (909) 787-5~e August 9, 2000 TO: Patty Anders City of Ternecula Planning Department RE: Cultural Resource Review Case: PA 00-0295; Lennar Homes Financing Tentative Tract Map A Records at the Eastern Information Center of the California Historical Resources Information System have been reviewed to determine if this project would adversely affect prehistoric or historic cultural resources: The proposed project area has not been surveyed for cultural resources and contains or is adjacent to known cultural resource(e]. A Phase I study is recommended. Based upon existing data the proposed project area has the potential for containing cultural resources. A Phase I study is recommended. A Phase I cultural resource study (MF # ) identified one or more cultural resources. The project area contains, or has the possibility of containing, cultural resources. However, due to the nature of the project or prior data recovery studies, an adverse effect oe cultural resources is not anticipated. Further study is not recommended. A Phase I cultural resource study IMF ~/991/2473/2664/2827) identified no cultural resources. Further study is not recommended. __ There is a Iow probability of cultural resources. Further study is not recommended, If, during construction, cultural resources are encountered, work should be halted or diverted in the immediate area while a qualified archaeologist evaluates the finds and makes recommendations. Due to the archaeological sensitivity of the area. earthmoving during construction should be monitored by a professional archaeologist. The submission of a cultural resource management report is recommended following guidelines for Archaeological Resource Management Reports prepared by the California Off[ce of Historic Preservation, P~eservetion P/anninE Bulletin 4(e), December 1989. Phase I Records search and field survey Phase II Testing [Evaluate resource significance; propose mitigation measures for "significant' sites.] Phase Ill Mitigation [Data recovery by excavation, preservation in place, er a comblnal~ion of the two.] Phase IV Monitor earthmoving activities COMMENTS: If you have any questions, please contact us. Eastern Information Center RTA I' ID:9096841007 MAY $1'01 9:14 No.O01P.02 May 3 l, 2001 Riverside Transit Agency 182S Third Street P.O. Box 59968 Riverside. CA 92517 PhDne:(909) 684-0850 Fax: (909) 6M-1007 City of Temccula Planning Department I met recently with Matt Fagan to discuss the Harvesion Sp~ific Plan. It appears that all attempts have been made to design rite project in a transit-friendly rammer, including the open-ended clustering orresid~nfial units. The mixed.uses in the Village Green Center · are also conducive to transit usage.. We hope to jointly design a pilot program to encourage transit usagc and thc usc of other alternatives to the single occupaneyvohiele. It would be benefieial for the community to provide transit access to adjacent areas, such a~ thc Promenade Mall, middle and high schools and local ~mployment centers. Please continue to keep us posted so we can maxiraize coordination ofp]anning efforts. Thmlk you for the opportunity to comment on this project.. P~ing Directo~i~-~ ATrACHMENT NO 7 DRAFT RESOLUTION APPROVING TFM 29928 R:\S PXHarveston SP~City CouncihSTAFFRPT 7-24-01.doc 17 Attachment No. 7 RESOLUTION NO. 01- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE crrY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 01-0030 - TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 29928, THE SUBDIVISION OF APPROXIMATELY 40 ACRES INTO 140 RESIDENTIAL LOTS AND 21 OPEN SPACE LOTS IN PLANNING AREA 7 OF THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN; LOCATED EAST OF INTERSTATE 15, NORTH OF SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK, WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD AND SOUTH OF THE NORTHERN CITY LIMIT, AND FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NOS. 911-180-003, 911-180-004, 911-640- 001 AND 911-630-003 WHEREAS, Lennar Communities filed Planning Application No. PA 01-0030 (Tentative Tract Map 29928), (the "Application") in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan, Development Code and Subdivision Ordinance; WHEREAS, the Application was processed including, but not limited to public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application on June 20, 2001, and July 12, 2001 at duly noticed public hearings as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did, testify either in support or opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearings and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission recommended approval of the Application subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder; WHEREAS, the City Council considered the Application on July 24, 2001, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support or opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Council hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Council approved of the Application, and certified the Environmental Impact Report and adopted the Mitigation Monitoring Program after finding that the project proposed in the Application conformed to the City of Temecula General Plan; WHEREAS, all legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by reference. R:\S P~tarveston SP,City Counci1~29928--CC RESO.doc section 2. Findinqs. That the City Council, in approving the Application, hereby makes the following findings as required in Section 16.09.140 of the Temecula Municipal Code. A. The proposed subdivision and the design and improvements of the subdivision is consistent with the Development Code, General Plan, any applicable specific plan and the City of Temecula Municipal Code; B. The proposed subdivision map is consistent with the subject specific plan and related General Plan Amendment. C. The tentative map does not propose to divide land which is subject to a contract entered into pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965, or the land is subject to a Land Conservation Act contract but the resulting parcels following division of the land will not be too small to sustain their agricultural use; D. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development proposed by the tentative map; E. The design of the subdivisions and the proposed improvements, with conditions of approval, are not likely to cause significant environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat as no sensitive species or habitant exist within the project boundaries; F. An environmental impact report has been prepared and a finding has been made, pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081(a) (3), finding that specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the environmental impact report; G. The design of the subdivisions and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems; H. The design of the subdivisions provides for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision to the extent feasible; I. The design of the subdivisions and the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision, or the design of the alternate easements which are substantially equivalent to those previously acquired by the public will be provided. J. The subdivisions are consistent with the City's parkland dedication requirements (Quimby). Section 3. Environmental Compliance. Residential projects approved under a Specific Plan are exempt from further environmental review pursuant to Section 15182 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines. All environmental impacts were previously identified and in the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) and Mitigation Monitoring Program in order to approve the project. R:~S l~larveston SP~City Councilk29928--CC RESO.doc 2 Section 4. Conditions. The City Council of the City of Temecula approves Planning Application No. PA 01-0030 (Tentative Tract Map 29928), the subdivision of approximately 40 acres into 140 residential lots and 21 open space lots in Planning Area 7, located within the Harveston Specific Plan, subject to the project specific conditions set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference together with any and all other necessary conditions that may be deemed necessary, for the property located east of Interstate 15, north or Santa Gertrudis Creek, west of Margarita Road and south or the northern City limit, and further identified as Assessor Parcel Nos. 911-180-003, 911-180-004, 911-640-001 and 911-630-003. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 24th day of July, 2001. ATTEST: Jeff Comerchero, Mayor Susan W. Jones, CMC/AAE City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 2001- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 24th of July, 2001, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: OUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC/AAE City Clerk R:~S P~Harveston SPXCity Counci1~29928--CC RESO.doc 3 EXHIBIT A CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TFM 29928 R:kS PXHarveston SP~City Councih29928--CC RESO.doc 4 EXHIBIT A (Attachment No. 7) CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: PA01- 0030 (Tentative Tract Map No. 29928) Project Description: The subdivision of approximately 40 acres into 140 residential lots and 21 open space lots in Planning Area 7, located within the Harveston Specific Plan. Assessor's Parcel Nos.: 911-180-003, 911-180-004, 911-640-001, and 911-630-003. Approval Date: Expiration Date: July 24, 2001 July 24, 2003 PLANNING DIVISION General Requirements The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act and to all the requirements of Temecula Subdivision Ordinance, unless modified by the conditions listed below. A time extension may be approved in accordance with the State Map Act and City Ordinance, upon written request, if made 30 days prior to the expiration date. The permittee/applicant shall indemnify, protect and hold harmless, the City and any agency or instrumentality thereof, and/or any of its officers, employees, and agents from any and all claims, actions, or proceedings against the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its officers, employees, and agents, to attack, set aside, void, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting from an approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application which action is brought within the appropriate statute of limitations period and Public Resources Code, Division 13, Chapter 4 (Section 21000 et seq., including but not by the way of limitations Section 21152 and 21167). The City shall promptly notify the permittee/applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding brought forth within this time period. The City shall estimate the cost of the defense of the action and applicant shall deposit said amount with the City. City may require additional deposits to cover anticipated costs. City shall refund, without interest, any unused portions of the deposit once the litigation is finally concluded. Should the City fail to either promptly notify or cooperate fully, permittee/applicant shall not, thereafter be responsible to indemnify, defend, protect, or hold harmless the City, any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its officers, employees, or agents. Should the applicant fail to timely post the required deposit, the Director may terminate the land use approval without further notice to the applicant. This project and all subsequent projects within this site shall be consistent with Specific Plan No. 13, the Harveston Specific Plan. R:~S P~Harveston SPheC DocsL29928-COA.doc The project and all subsequent projects within this site shall comply with all mitigation measures identified within the Final Environmental Impact Report for the Harveston Specific Plan, and the approved Mitigation Monitoring Program thereof. Within thirty (30) days of the final approval of the project by the City Council, the map shall be submitted to the Planning Department in final form for review and approval. The final form shall include all conditions of approval and all modifications made by the Planning Commission and City Council. The Developer shall disclose to all home buyers that Date Street is planned to be a six (6) lane urban arterial roadway and will include a freeway interchange pursuant to the City of Temecula General Plan Circulation Element. The approval granted by this Resolution shall become effective upon the Effective Date of the Development Agreement, as the term Effective Date is defined in the Development Agreement adopted concurrently with this Resolution. Notwithstanding any of the conditions contained herein, the Developer and the City may enter into a development agreement, pursuant to Government Code Section 65864 through 65869.5 or other agreement(s) requiring the Developer to: 1) advance the funding or construction of public improvements; 2) redefine the scope of any public improvement; 3) acquire or fund the acquisition of land for public purposes; and 4) waive any right to reimbursement for facilities or the dedication of land. Further, notwithstanding any of the conditions contained herein, Developer may seek an agreement for reimbursement for any improvements or facilities that qualify for reimbursement at such time as the City of Temecula adopts an ordinance for such reimbursement pursuant to and consistent with California Government Code Sections 66485 through 66489, inclusive, and further shall waive the same in the event of agreements, consistent with the foregoing, that require or include any or all of the terms set forth immediately above. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits A copy of the Rough Grading plans shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Division. 10. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that ordinance or by providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid. Prior to Recordation of the Final Map 11. The following shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division: a. A copy of the Final Map. b. A copy of the Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) with the following notes: 1) This property is located within thirty (30) miles of Mount Palomar Observatory. All proposed outdoor lighting systems shall comply with the California Institute of Technology, Palomar Observatory recommendations, Ordinance No. 655. R:\S P~arveston SP~PC DocsX29928-COA.doc 2 2) The Harveston Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared for this project and is on file at the City of Temecula Community Development Department - Planning Division. c. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&R's) t) CC&R's shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director. The CC&R's shall include liability insurance and methods of maintaining open space, recreation areas, parking areas, private roads, exterior of all buildings and all landscaped and open areas including parkways. 2) No lot or dwelling unit in the development shall be sold unless a corporation, association, property owner's group or similar entity has been formed with the right to assess all properties individually owned or jointly owned which have any rights or interest in the use of the common areas and common facilities in the development, such assessment power to be sufficient to meet the expenses of such entity, and with authority to control, and the duty to maintain, all of said mutually available features of the development. Such entity shall operate under recorded CC&R's which shall include compulsory membership of all owners of lots and/or dwelling units and flexibility of assessments to meet changing costs of maintenance, repairs, and services. Recorded CC&R's shall permit enforcement by the City for provisions required as Conditions of Approval. The developer shall submit evidence of compliance with this requirement to, and receive approval of, the city prior to making any such sale. This condition shall not apply to land dedicated to the City for public purposes. 3) Every owner of a dwelling unit or lot shall own as an appurtenance to such dwelling unit or lot, either (1) an undivided interest in the common areas and facilities, or (2) a share in the corporation, or voting membership in an association owning the common areas and facilities. Prior to Issuance of Building Permits 12. The applicant shall conduct an acoustical study to ensure acceptable interior and exterior noise standards pursuant to the General Plan noise levels for residential and commercial structures. All recommend construction techniques, improvements and/or walls recommended in the acoustical report shall be incorporated into the construction of the structures and subdivision. 13. The following shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division: Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans. The location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Landscaping Ordinance. The cover page shall identify the total square footage of the landscaped area for the site. The plans shall be accompanied by the following items: t) Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal). 2) One (1) copy of the approved grading plan. R:\S PXHarveston SI~PC Docs~29928-COA.doc 3 3) Water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water Efficient Ordinance). 4) Automatic irrigation for all landscaped areas and complete screening of all ground mounted equipment from the view of the public from streets and adjacent property for: Front yards and slopes within individual lots prior to issuance of occupancy permits for any lot(s). b. Private common areas prior to issuance of occupancy permits. All landscaping excluding Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) maintained areas and front yard landscaping which shall include, but may not be limited to private slopes and common areas. All street frontage of school sites along General Plan and Specific Plan designated roadways. Wall and Fence Plans consistent with the Harveston Specific Plan and the Conceptual Landscape. Precise Grading Plans consistent with the approved rough grading plans including all structural setback measurements. 14. Roof-mounted mechanical equipment shall not be permitted within the subdivision, however solar equipment or any other energy saving devices shall be permitted with Planning Manager approval. Prior to Issuance of Occupancy Permits 15. If deemed necessary by the Director of Planning, the applicant shall provide additional landscaping to effectively screen various components of the project. 16. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall be installed consistent with the approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Director of Planning. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working order. 17. Front yard and slope landscaping within individual lots shall be completed for inspection prior to issuance of each occupancy permit (excluding model home complex structures). 18. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. R:\S PXHarves~on SPXPC Docs\29928-COA.doc 4 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT The Department of Public Works recommends the following Conditions of Approval for this project. Unless stated otherwise, all conditions shall be completed by the Developer at no cost to any Government Agency. General Requirements 19. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the tentative map all existing and proposed easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and revision. 20. A Grading Permit for either rough or precise grading shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained road right-of-way. 21. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way. 22. All improvement plans, grading plans, landscape and irrigation plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars. Prior to Approval of the Final Map, unless other timing is indicated, the Developer shall complete the following or have plans submitted and approved, subdivision improvement agreements executed and securities posted: 23. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: a. San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board b. Rancho California Water District c. Eastern Municipal Water District d. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District e. City of Temecula Fire Prevention Bureau f. Planning Department g. Department of Public Works h. Riverside County Health Department i. Cable TV Franchise Community Services District R:\S PXHarveston SPxP(2 Docs\29928-COA.doc 5 24. 25. k. General Telephone I. Southern California Edison Company m. Southern California Gas Company The Developer shall construct the following public improvements to City of Temecula General Plan standards unless otherwise noted. Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works: Improve Street "B" (Modified Street Section per the Specific Plan - 100' R/W) to include dedication of half-width street right-of-way, installation of half-width street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer), raised landscaped median. Improve Harveston School Drive - (Modified Street Section per the Specific Plan - 82' R/W) to include dedication of full width street right-of-way, installation of full width street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer). Improve Harveston Drive - (Modified Street Section per the Specific Plan - 66' R/W) to include dedication of full width street right-of-way, installation of full width street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer). Improve Streets "HH", "11", "JJ", and "KK" - (Modified Street Section per the Specific Plan - 66' R/W) to include dedication of full width street right-of-way, installation of full width street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer). Improve Streets "LL", "MM", "NN", "OO", "PP", "QQ", "RR", "SS", 'q'-r", and "UU" (Modified Street Section per the Specific Plan - 56' R/W) to include dedication of full width street right-of-way, installation of full width street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer). All street improvement design shall provide adequate right-of-way and pavement transitions per Caltrans standards for transition to existing street sections. A School Zone signing and striping plan, per Caltrans standards, shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer for the school site within this project and included with the street improvement plans for the project. Design shall also include a warrant analysis for a flashing yellow beacon and if warrants are met, shall be installed by the Developer. Unless otherwise approved the following minimum criteria shall be observed in the design of the street improvement plans: R:~S l",Ha~ veston SP~PC Docs~29928-COA.doc 6 a. Street centerline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over A.C. paving. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City Standard Nos. 207, 207A and/or 208. Streetlights shall be installed along the public streets and shall be designed in accordance with Specific Plan Standards. Concrete sidewalks shall be constructed in accordance with City Standard Nos. 400 and 401 or as modified in the Specific Plan to 5' width. Design of street improvements shall extend a minimum of 300 feet beyond the project boundaries to ensure adequate continuity of design with adjoining properties. f. Minimum centerline radii shall be in accordance with City Standard No. 113. All reverse curves shall include a 100-foot minimum tangent section. All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees. All units shall be provided with zero clearance garage doors and garage door openers if the driveway is less than 18 feet in depth from back of sidewalk. Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility. All utility systems including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer, and cable TV shall be provided underground. Easements shall be provided as required where adequate right-of-way does not exist for installation of the facilities. All utilities shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City Codes and the utility provider. All utilities, except electrical lines rated 33kv or greater, shall be installed underground 26. 27. A construction area Traffic Control Plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and reviewed by the Department of Public Works for any street closure and detour or other disruption to traffic circulation as required by the Department of Public Works. Relinquish and waive right of access to and from Margarita Road, Harveston School Road and Harveston Drive on the Final Map with the exception of any opening(s) as delineated on the approved Tentative Tract Map. 28. Corner property line cut off for vehicular sight distance and installation of pedestrian facilities shall be provided at all street intersections in accordance with Riverside County Standard No. 805. 29. All easements and/or right-of-way dedications shall be offered for dedication to the public or other appropriate agency and shall continue in force until the City accepts or abandons such offers. All dedications shall be free from ali encumbrances as approved by the Department of Public Works. R:~S l:~larveston SP~PC DocsX2992842OA.doc 7 30. Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid. 31. An Environmental Constraints Sheet (ECS) shall be prepared in conjunction with the Final Map to delineate identified environmental concerns and shall be recorded with the map. A copy of the ECS shall be transmitted to the Planning Department for review and approval. 32. The Developer shall comply with all constraints, which may be shown upon an Environmental Constraint Sheet recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject property. 33. The Developer shall notify the City's cable TV Franchises of the Intent to Develop. Conduit shall be installed to cable TV Standards at time of street improvements. 34. Bus bays will be provided at all existing and future bus stops as determined by the Department of Public Works in consultation with RTA and the Developer. 35. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be required and shall be delineated and noted on the final map. 36. Easements for sidewalks for public uses shall be dedicated to the City where sidewalks meander through private property. 37. Easements, when required for roadway slopes, landscape easements, drainage facilities, utilities, etc., shall be shown on the final map if they are located within the land division boundary. All offers of dedication and conveyances shall be submitted for review and recorded as directed by the Department of Public Works. On-site drainage facilities located outside of road right-of-way shall be contained within drainage easements and shown on the final map. A note shall be added to the final map stating, "drainage easements shall be kept free of buildings and obstructions." Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits 38. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: a. San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board b. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District c. Planning Department d. Department of Public Works 39. A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in accordance with City of Temecula standards and approved by the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any grading. The plan shall incorporate adequate erosion control measures to protect the site and adjoining properties from damage due to erosion. 40. Il:kS I~Harveston SPxPC Docs\29928-COA.doc A Soils Report shall be prepared by a registered Civil or Soils Engineer and submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and preliminary pavement sections. 41. A Geotechnical Report shall be prepared by a registered engineer or engineering geologist and submitted to the Department of public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address special study zones and identify any geotechnical hazards for the site including location of faults and potential for liquefaction. The report shall include recommendations to mitigate the impact of ground shaking and liquefaction. 42. A Drainage Study shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The study shall identify storm water runoff quantities expected from the development of this site and upstream of the site. It shall identify all existing or proposed off-site or on-site, public or private, drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. Runoff shall be conveyed to an adequate outfall capable of receiving the storm water runoff without damage to public or private property. The study shall include a capacity analysis verifying the adequacy of all facilities. Any upgrading or upsizing of drainage facilities necessary to convey the storm water runoff shall be provided as part of development of this project. The basis for analysis and design shall be a storm with a recurrence interval of one hundred years. 43. The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or the project is shown to be exempt. 44. The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works. 45. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by either cashier's check or money order, prior to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area drainage plan fee. If the.full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid. 46. The Developer shall obtain letters of approval or easements for any off-site work performed on adjoining properties. The letters or easements shall be in a format as directed by the Department of Public Works. 47. All lot drainage shall be directed to the driveway by side yard drainage swales independent of any other lot. Prior to Issuance of Building Permits 48. Final Map shall be approved and recorded. 49. A Precise Grading Plan shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval. The building pad shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer for location and elevation, and the Soils Engineer shall issue a Final Soils Report addressing compaction and site conditions. R:\S PXHarveston SPXPC DocsX29928-COA.dcc 9 50. 51. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the California Building Code, the approved grading plan, the conditions of the grading permit, City Grading Standards and accepted grading construction practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved rough grading plan. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06 unless otherwise provided for by a written agreement between the City and the Developer. Prior to Issuance of Certificates of Occupancy 52. 53. 54. 55. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: a. Rancho California Water District b. Eastern Municipal Water District c. Department of Public Works All necessary certifications and clearances from engineers, utility companies and public agencies shall be submitted as required by the Department of Public Works. All improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and City standards to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken due to the construction operations of this project shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT The Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) has reviewed Tentative Tract Map No. 29928 and provides the following conditions of approval: General Requirements 56. All slope/landscape plans submitted for consideration for TCSD maintenance shall be in conformance with the City of Temecula Landscape and Irrigation Specifications and Installation Details and Park Land and Landscape Dedication Process. 57. All perimeter slope and parkway landscaping, designated as Temecula Community Services Department (TCSD) maintenance areas, shall be identified and offered for dedication to the TCSD as a maintenance easement on the final map. Underlying ownership of the respective areas shall remain with the individual property owner or the Homeowner's Association. All other landscape areas, open space, entry monumentation, signage, pedestrian portals, bus shelters, fences and walls shall be maintained by the Homeowners Association (HCA), private maintenance association or property owner. R:\S I~Harveston SPXPC Doc$\29928 COA.doc 10 58. Construction of the proposed TCSD landscape maintenance areas and landscape medians shall commence pursuant to a pre-construction meeting with the developer and TCSD Maintenance Superintendent. Failure to comply with the TCSD review and inspection process may preclude acceptance of these areas into the TCSD maintenance programs. 59. The developer, the developer's successor or assignee, shall be responsible for all maintenance of the slopes/landscaping areas until such time as those responsibilities are accepted by the TCSD or other responsible party. 60. 61. Class II bicycle lanes on both sides of the Loop Road (Harveston Drive), Harveston School Drive, Street "B", Date Street and Margarita Road shall be identified on the street improvement plans and constructed in concurrence with the completion of said street improvements. The developer is entitled to receive a credit against the park component of the City's Development Impact Fee (DIF) based upon the actual cost of improving the community park as identified in Planning Area 1 of the Harveston Specific Plan. The fee/credit issue shall be addressed pursuant to the execution of a Development Agreement or a Park Improvement Agreement between the applicant and the City prior to approval of the final map. Prior to Approval of the Final Map 62. All areas intended for dedication to the TCSD for maintenance shall be identified on the final map by numbered lots with the square footage of said lot numbers indexed as proposed TCSD maintenance areas. 63. All TCSD slope/landscaping maintenance easements shall be offered for dedication on the final map. 64. Landscape construction drawings for all proposed TCSD slope/landscape maintenance areas and landscape medians shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Services. 65. The developer shall post security and enter into an agreement to improve all proposed TCSD maintenance areas and landscape medians. 66. The developer shall file a notice of intention with the Temecula Community Services District to initiate election proceedings for acceptance of residential street lights and perimeter slope/landscape into the respective TCSD maintenance programs. All costs associated with this process shall be borne by the developer. Prior to Issuance of Building Permits 67. Prior to the installation of street lights or issuance of building permits, whichever comes first, the developer shall file an application and pay the appropriate fees to the TCSD for the dedication of arterial and residential street lights into the appropriate TCSD maintenance program. Prior to Issuance of Certificates of Occupancy R:\S PXHarveston SPxPC Docsk29928-COA.doc 11 68. Prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy within each phase map, the developer shall submit the most current list of Assessor's Parcel Numbers assigned to the final project. 69. It shall be the developer's responsibility to provide written disclosure of the existence of TCSD and its service level rates and charges to all prospective purchasers. FIRE DEPARTMENT The following are the Fire Department Conditions of Approval for this project. Ail questions regarding the meaning of these conditions shall be referred to the Fire Prevention Bureau. 70. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in force at the time of building plan submittal. 71. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for residential land division per CFC Appendix III.A, Table A-III-A-1. The developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 1500 GPM at 20-PSI residual operating pressure with a 2-hour duration. The required fire flow may be adjusted during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire Flow as given above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC 903.2, Appendix i~i-A) 72. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC Appendix III.B, Table A-III-B-1. Standard fire hydrants (6" x 4" x 2 1/2" outlets) shall be located on Fire Department access roads and adjacent public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 500 feet apart, at each intersection and shall be located no more than 250 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required. (CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix 73. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for commemial land division per CFC Appendix Ill-A, Table A-Ill-A-1. The developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 4000 GPM at 20-PSI residual operating pressure with a 4 hour duration. The required fire flow may be adjusted during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire Flow as given above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC 903.2, Appendix H -A) 74. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC Appendix Ill-B, Table A-Ill-B-1. Super fire hydrants (6" x 4" x 2-2 1/2" outlets) shall be located on Fire Department access roads and adjacent public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 350 feet apart, at each intersection and shall be located no more than 210 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required. (CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix R:\S l~Harveston SP~C DocsL29928-COA.doc 12 75. 76~ 77. 78. 79. 80. 81. 82. 83. 84. Maximum cul-de-sac length shall not exceed 1320 feet. Minimum turning radius on any cul-de-sac shall be thirty-seven (37) feet for residential and forty-five (45) feet for commercial. (CFC 902.2.2.3, CFC 902.2.2.4) If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection prior to any building construction. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2) Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent roads are installed. Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface for 80,000 lbs. GVVV. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2) Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved Fire Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or any portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface designed for 80,000 lbs. GVVV with a minimum AC thickness of .25 feet. (CFC sec 902) Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have a clear paved section of thirty-six (36) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13) feet six (6) inches. (CFC 902.2.2.1) Private roads and alleys may be as narrow as 20 feet unobstructed travel width, not including any parking with Fire Prevention approval on a map by map basis. On this map these are approved where homes also face a public road. Prior to building construction, dead end road ways and streets in excess of one hundred and fifty (150) feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of accommodating fire apparatus. (CFC 902.2.2.4) Prior to building construction, this development and any street within serving more than 35 homes or any commercial developments shall have two (2) points of access, via all- weather surface roads, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 902.2.1) Where phasing affects planned road connections temporary construction roads may serve as the second point of access. Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall be: signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature block; and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. After the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be presented to the Fire Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system including fire hydrants shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building materials being placed on an individual lot. (CFC 8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and National Fire Protection Association 24 1-4.1 ) Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective Markers" shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations. (CFC 901.4.3) R:\S PXHarveston SP~PC Docs\29928 COA doc 13 85. All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry system for emergency access by firefighting personnel. (CFC 902.4) Special Conditions 86. Prior to construction of roads a simple map in an electronic file of the .DWG format must be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau. Alternative file formats may be acceptable, contact fire prevention for approval. BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT 87. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 1998 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 1998 National Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy and Disabled Access Regulations and the Temecula Municipal Code. 88. 89. Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plans showing compliance with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All street lights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted to the Building & Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School Mitigation Fees. 90. Obtain all plans checks and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. 91. 92. 93. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review. Disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of any public building is required. The path of travel shall meet the California Disabled Access Regulations in terms of cross slope, travel slope stripping and signage. Provide all details on plans (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1, 1998). All public building and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations. Provide all details on plans. (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1, 1998). 94. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans submitted for plan review. 95. Provide electrical plan including Icad calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic and mechanical plan for plan review. 96. Truss calculations that are stamped by the engineer of record and the truss manufacturer engineer are required for plan review submittal. 97. Provide precise grading plan for plan check submittal to check for handicap accessibility. R:~S PXHarveston SPXPC Docsk29928-COA.doc 98. Show all building setbacks 99. Post conspicuously at the entrance to the project the hours of construction as allowed by City of Temecula Ordinance #0-90-04, and specifically Section G (1) of the Riverside County Ordinance # 457.73, for any site within one-quarter mile of an occupied residence. Construction hours are as follows: Monday - Friday Saturday 6;30 a.m. - 6:30 p.m. 7:00 a.m. - 6:30 p.m. No work is permitted on Sunday or Government Code Holidays OTHER AGENCIES 100. Flood protection shall be provided in accordance with the Riverside County Flood Control District's transmittal dated February 25, 2001, a copy of which is attached. The fee is made payable to the Riverside County Flood Control Water District by either a cashier's check or money order, prior to the issuance of a grading permit (unless deferred to a later date by the District), based upon the prevailing area drainage plan fee. 101. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the County of Riverside Department of Environmental Health's transmittal dated February 22, 2001, a copy of which is attached. 102. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Rancho California Water District's transmittal dated January 25, 2001, a copy of which is attached. 103. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Riverside Transit Agency transmittal dated Ma 31, 2001, a copy of which is attached. By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be subject to Community Development Department approval. Applicant Signature R:\S l~,Harveston SP~PC Doc;\29928-COA.doc 15 DAVID P. ZAPPE General Manager-Chief Engineer 1995 MARKET STREET RIVERSIDE, CA 92501 909/955-1200 Planning Department Post Office Box 9033 ' Temecula, California 92589-9033 Attention: PA'/'T' L/ /~ h,/~ Ladies and Gentlemen: Re: TT/v[ Zc~c~ 2-'~' The Disthct does not normally recommend conditions for land divisions or other land use cases in incorporated cities. The Distdct also does not plan check city land use cases, or provide State Division of Real Estate letters or other flood hazard reports for suchcases. Disthct comments/recommendations for such cases are normally limited to items of specific interest to the District including Distdct Master Drainage Plan facilities, other regiorial flood control and drainage facilities which cou d be considered a logical componenfor extension of a master plan s stem, and Distdct Area Drainage P an fees (development mitigation fees) n add t on, information of a gen6ra nS~/~re s provided. - The District has not reviewed the proposed project in detail and the following checked comments do not in any way constitute or imply Distdct approval or endorsement of the proposed project with respect to flood hazard, public health and safety or any other such issue: I./" This pr.oject would not be impacted by District Master Drainage Plan facilities nor are other facilities of regional ~nterest proposed. This project involves District Master Plan facilities. The District will accept ownership of such facilities on wdtten request of the C ty Fac t es must be constructed to District standards, and District plan check and inspection will be requ red for District acceptance. Plan check, inspection and administrative fees will be required. 909/788-9965 FAX 51180.1 This project proposes channels storm dra ns 36 inches or larger in diameter, or other facilities that could be considered regional in nature and/or a logical extension of the adopted Master Drainage Plan. The Disthct wou d consider accepting ownership ot such tac~l~t~es on written request of the City. Facilities must be constructed to District standards, and Distdct plan check and inspectiofl will be required for District acceptance, plan check, inspection and administrative fees will be required. ~This. proje~ is I. ocate, d within the limits of the District's ~UR. PaE.T~ ~J~l u. ra~n. age ~an mr which drainage fees have been adopted; applicable tees/s~ou~d c~nei,.ch~r...m2n_ey ~_d.~r o._nly to. t~e FIo. od Control Distridt prio.r t6 issuance of'bu~l~i~-~)r~d}'~o"~q'~i~ ~.vu, ~umes .rs[. ~-ees [o De pa,d should be at the rets in effect at the time of i~suan~ce of ~h~ actual GENERAL INFORMATION This project may require a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board C earance for grading, recordation, or other final approva/should not be given until the City has determined that the project has been granted a permit or is shown to be exempt. . If this project involves a Federa Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)mapped flood plain, then the City should require the applicant to provide all stud es, calculations, plans and other information required to meet FEMA requirements, and should further require that the applicant obtain a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) pdor to grading, recordation or other final approval of the project, and a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) prior occupancy. If a natural watercourse or mapped flood plain is impacted by this project, the City should require the applicant to obtain a Section 1601/1603 Agreement from the Califomia Department of Fish and Game and a Clean Water Act Section 404 Permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, or wdtten correspondence from these a encies indicating the project is exempt from these requirements. A Clean Water ACt Section 401 Water Quality Card'cation may be required from the oca California Regional Water Quality Control Board pdor to issuance of the Corps 404 permit. Very truly yours, Senior Civil E~.~n.~er Date: ~-- 2 ~. ~'~.A · COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, HEAm ri SERVICES AGENCY February 22,200l City of Temecula Plmming Department P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 ATTN: Patty Anders, Associate Plmmer RE: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 2992~ CITY OF mVERSlDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. (1 LOTS) Dear Gentlemen: TEMECULA, COUNTY OF 1. The Department of Environmental Health has reviewed Tentative Tract Map No. 2992~and recommends: A water system shall be installed according to plans and specifications as approved by the water company and the Environmental Health Department. Permanent prints of the plans of the water system shall be submitted in triplicate, with a minimum scale not less than one-inch equal's 200 feet, along with the original drawing to the City of Temecula. The prints shall show the internal pipe diameter, location of valves and fire hydrants; pipe and joint specifications, and the size of the main at the junction of the new system to the existing system. The plans shall comply in all respects with Div. 5, Part 1, and Chapter 7 of the California Health and Safety Code, California Administrative Code, Title 11, Chapter 16, and General Order No. 103 of the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California, when applicable. The plans shall be signed by a registered engineer and water company with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the xvater system in Tentative Tract Map No. 2992~is in accordance with the water system expansion plans of the Rancho California Water District and that the water services, storage, and distribution system will be adequate to provide water service to such Tract Map". This certification does not constitute a guarantee that it will supply water to such Tract Map at any specific quantities, flows or pressures for fire protection or any other purpose. This certification shall be signed by a responsible official of the water company. The plans must be submitted to the City of Temecula's Office to revie;v at least TWO WEEKS PRIOR to the request for the recordation of the final map. This subdivision has a statement from Rancho California Water District agreeing to serve domestic water to each and every lot in the subdivision on demand providing satisfactory financial arrangements are completed with the subdivider. It will be necessary for financial arrangements to be made PRIOR to the recordation of the final map. Local Enforcement Agenc~ * [?O. Box 1280. Riverside, CA 92502-1280 * (909) 955-8982 City of Temecula Planning De Page Two Attn: Patty Anders February 22, 2001 This subdivision is within the Eastern Municipal Water District and shall be connected to the sewers of the District. The sewer system shall be installed according to plans and specifications as approved by the District, the City of Temecula and the Environmental Health Department. Permanent prints of the plans of the sewer system shall be submitted in triplicate, along with the original drawing, to the City of Temecula. The prints shall show the internal pipe diameter, location of manholes, complete profiles, pipe and joint specifications and the size of the sewers at the junction of the new system to the existing system. A single plat indicating location of sewer lines and waterlines shall be a portion of the sewage plans and profiles. The plans shall be signed by a registered engineer and the sewer district with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the sewer system in Tentative Tract Map No. 2992.~ is in accordance with the sewer system expansion plans of the Eastern Municipal Water District and that the waste disposal system is adequate at this time to treat the anticipated wastes from the proposed Tract Map". The plans must be submitted to the City of Temecula's Office to review at least two weeks PRIOR to the request for the recordation of the final map. It will be necessary for financial arrangements to be completely finalized PRIOR to recordation of the final map. It will be necessary for the annexation proceedings to be completely finalized PRIOR to the recordation of the final map. Additional approval from Riverside County Environmental Health Department will be required for all tenants operating a food facility or generating any hazardous waste. Sincerely, x~')Sam Mt2arl i~nvironment al Health Sp eci alist SM:dr (909) 955-8980 January 25, 2001 Patty Anders, Case Planner City of Temecnla Planning Department 43200 Business Park Drive Post Office Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 JAN 2, 9 ?.,901 ~ By SUBJECT: WATER AVAILABILITY TRACT NO. 29928 HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA01-0030 Dear Ms. Anders: Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located within the boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD). Water service, therefore, would be available upon completion of financial arrangements between RCWD and thc property owner. If fire protection is required, the customer will need to contact RCWD for fees and requirements. Water availability would be contingent upon the property ovmer signing Agency Agreement that assigns water management rights, if any, to RCWD. C. MichaelCowett Best Best&KriegerLLP Genera] Counsel In our previous correspondence to Debbie Ubnoske dated December 5, 2000, RCWD requested that the developer consider the use of recycled water for the proposed pond to be located in this development and for any other appropriate uses. We request that the developer discuss these requirements with RCWD stafC If you should have any questions, please contact an Engineering Services Representative at this office. Sincerely, RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT Steve Brannon, P.E. Development Engineering Manager 0 I~SB:at030\F012-TI~FCF RTA ID:9096841007 MRY $1'01 9:14 No.O01P.02 mini May 31, 2001 River~ide Transit Agency 1825 Third Stree! P.O. Box 59968 River~ideo CA 92517 Phone:(909) 684-0850 Fax: (909) 684-1007 City of Temccula Planning DcpaCmicat I met recently with Matt Fagan to discuss the Harvcston Specific Plan. It appears that all attempts have been made to dcsi .gl, l thc .project in a transit-friendly mmmcr, including thc open-ended clustering ol'residentml umts. 'Thc mixed-uses in the Village Green Center · ar~ also conducive to transit usage.. We hope to jointly design a pilot program to encourage transit usage and thc usc of other alternatives to the single occupancy vehicle. It would be beneficial for the community to provide transit access to adjaoent areas, such as thc Promenade Mall, middle and high schools and local employment centers. Please continue to keep us posted so we can maximize coordination of planning efforts. Thank you for the oppoManity to comment on this project. · ATTACHMENT NO 8 DRAFT RESOLUTION APPROVING TTM 29929 R:\S P~Harveston SPXCity CounciI\STAFFRPT 7-24-01.doc 18 Attachment No. 8 RESOLUTION NO. 01- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 01-0031 - TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 29929, THE SUBDIVISION OF APPROXIMATELY 20 ACRES INTO 118 RESIDENTIAL LOTS AND 3 OPEN SPACE LOTS IN A PORTION OF PLANNING AREAS 3 AND 4 OF THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN; LOCATED EAST OF INTERSTATE 15, NORTH OF SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK, WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD AND SOUTH OF THE NORTHERN CITY LIMIT, AND FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NOS. 910-261- 001, 910-261-002, 911-180-002, 911-180-003, 911-180-004 AND 911- 180-015 WHEREAS, Lennar Communities filed Planning Application No. PA 01-0031 (Tentative Tract Map 29929 the "Application") in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan, Development Code and Subdivision Ordinance; WHEREAS, the Application was processed including, but not limited to public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application on June 20, 2001, and July 12, 2001, at duly noticed public hearings as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did, testify either in support or opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearings and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission recommended approval of the Application subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder; WHEREAS, the City Council considered the Application on July 24, 2001, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support or opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Council hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Council approved of the Application, and certified the Environmental Impact Report and adopted the Mitigation Monitoring Program after finding that the project proposed in the Application conformed to the City of Temecula General Plan; WHEREAS, all legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: R:~S P~Harveston SP~City CouncilL29929--CC RESO.doc Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by reference. Section 2. Findings. That the City Council, in approving the Application, hereby makes the following findings as required in Section 16.09.140 of the Temecula Municipal Code. A. The proposed subdivision and the design and improvements of the subdivision is consistent with the Development Code, General Plan, any applicable specific plan and the City of Temecula Municipal Code; B. The proposed subdivision map is consistent with the subject specific plan and related General Plan Amendment. C. The tentative map does not propose to divide land which is subject to a contract entered into pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965, or the land is subject to a Land Conservation Act contract but the resulting parcels following division of the land will not be too small to sustain their agricultural use; D. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development proposed by the tentative map; E. The design of the subdivisions and the proposed improvements, with conditions of approval, are not likely to cause significant environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat as no sensitive species or habitant exist within the project boundaries; F. An environmental impact report has been prepared and a finding has been made, pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081(a) (3), finding that specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the environmental impact report; G. The design of the subdivisions and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems; H. The design of the subdivisions provides for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision to the extent feasible; I. The design of the subdivisions and the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision, or the design of the alternate easements which are substantially equivalent to those previously acquired by the public will be provided. J. The subdivisions are consistent with the City's parkland dedication requirements (Quimby). Section 3. Environmental Compliance. Residential projects approved under a Specific Plan are exempt from further environmental review pursuant to Section 15182 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines. All environmental impacts were previously identified and in the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) and Mitigation Monitoring Program in order to approve the project. R:~S PXHarveston S~City Council~9929--CC RESO.doc 2 Section 4. Conditions. The City Council of the City of Temecula approves Planning Application No. PA 01-0031 (Tentative Tract Map 29929), the subdivision of approximately 20 acres into 118 residential lots and 3 open space lots in a portion of Planning Areas 3 and 4, located within the Harveston Specific Plan, subject to the project specific conditions set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference together with any and all other necessary conditions that may be deemed necessary, for the property located east of Interstate 15, north or Santa Gertrudis Creek, west of Margarita Road and south or the northern City limit, and further identified as Assessor Parcel Nos. 910-261-001,910-261-002, 911-180-002, 911-180- 003, 911-180-004 and 911-180-015. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 24th day of July, 2001. A'I-I'EST: Jeff Comerchero, Mayor Susan W. Jones, CMC/AAE City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTYOF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 2001- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 24th of July, 2001, by the following vote: AYES: COUNClLMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC/AAE City Clerk R:~S P~Harveston SP~City Counci1~29929--CC RESO.doc 3 EXHIBIT A CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TrM 29929 R:~S P~-Iarveston SPxCity Councilk29929--CC RESO.doc 4 EXHIBIT A (Attachment No. 8) CITY OFTEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: PA01- 0031 (Tentative Tract Map No. 29929) Project Description: Assessor's Parcel Nos.: Approval Date: Expiration Date: The subdivision of approximately 20 acres into 118 residential lOts and 3 open space lots in a portion of Planning Areas 3 and 4, located within the Harveston Specific Plan PLANNING DIVISION 910-261-001, 910-261-002, 911-180-002, 911-180-003, 911-180- 004 and 911-180-015. General Requirements July 24, 2001 July 24, 2003 The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act and to all the requirements of Temecula Subdivision Ordinance, unless modified by the conditions listed below. A time extension may be approved in accordance with the State Map Act and City Ordinance, upon written request, if made 30 days prior to the expiration date. The permittee/applicant shall indemnify, protect and hold harmless, the City and any agency or instrumentality thereof, and/or any of its officers, employees, and agents from any and all claims, actions, or proceedings against the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its officers, employees, and agents, to attack, set aside, void, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting from an approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application which action is brought within the appropriate statute of limitations period and Public Resoumes Code, Division 13, Chapter 4 (Section 21000 et seq., including but not by the way of limitations Section 21152 and 21167). The City shall promptly notify the permittee/applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding brought forth within this time period. The City shall estimate the cost of the defense of the action and applicant shall deposit said amount with the City. City may require additional deposits to cover anticipated costs. City shall refund, without interest, any unused portions of the deposit once the litigation is finally concluded. Should the City fail to either promptly notify or cooperate fully, permittee/applicant shall not, thereafter be responsible to indemnify, defend, protect, or hold harmless the City, any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its officers, employees, or agents. Should the applicant fail to timely post the required deposit, the Director may terminate the land use approval without further notice to the applicant. This project and all subsequent projects within this site shall be consistent with Specific Plan No. 13, the Harveston Specific Plan. R:~S PXHarveston SPWC Docs~29929-COA.doc The project and all subsequent projects within this site shall comply with all mitigation measures identified within the Final Environmental Impact Report for the Harveston Specific Plan, and the approved Mitigation Monitoring Program thereof. Within thirty (30) days of the final approval of the project by the City Council, the map shall be submitted to the Planning Department in final form for review and approval. The final form shall include all conditions of approval and all modifications made by the Planning Commission and City Council. The Developer shall disclose to all home buyers that Date Street is planned to be a six (6) lane urban arterial roadway and will include a freeway interchange pursuant to the City of Temecula General Plan Circulation Element. The approval granted by this Resolution shall become effective upon the Effective Date of the Development Agreement, as the term Effective Date is defined in the Development Agreement adopted concurrently with this Resolution. Notwithstanding any of the conditions contained herein, the Developer and the City may enter into a development agreement, pursuant to Government Code Section 65864 through 65869.5 or other agreement(s) requiring the Developer to: 1) advance the funding or construction of public improvements; 2) redefine the scope of any public improvement; 3) acquire or fund the acquisition of land for public purposes; and 4) waive any right to reimbursement for facilities or the dedication of land. Further, notwithstanding any of the conditions contained herein, Developer may seek an agreement for reimbursement for any improvements or facilities that qualify for reimbursement at such time as the City of Temecula adopts an ordinance for such reimbursement pursuant to and consistent with California Government Code Sections 66485 through 66489, inclusive, and further shall waive the same in the event of agreements, consistent with the foregoing, that require or include any or all of the terms set forth immediately above. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits A copy of the Rough Grading plans shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Division. 10. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that ordinance or by providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid. Prior to Recordation of the Final Map 11. The following shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division: a. A copy of the Final Map. b. A copy of the Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) with the following notes: i. This property is located within thirty (30) miles of Mount Palomar Observatory. All proposed outdoor lighting systems shall comply with the California Institute of Technology, Palomar Observatory recommendations, Ordinance No. 655. R:\S P~Harveston SI~PC Doc~L29929-COA.doc 2 ii. The Harveston Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared for this project and is on file at the City of Temecula Community Development Department - Planning Division. c. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&R's) CC&R's shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director. The CC&R's shall include liability insurance and methods of maintaining open space, recreation areas, parking areas, private roads, exterior of all buildings and all landscaped and open areas including parkways. ii. No lot or dwelling unit in the development shall be sold unless a corporation, association, property owner's group or similar entity has been formed with the right to assess all properties individually owned or jointly owned which have any rights or interest in the use of the common areas and common facilities in the development, such assessment power to be sufficient to meet the expenses of such entity, and with authority to control, and the duty to maintain, all of said mutually available features of the development. Such entity shall operate under recorded CC&R's which shall include compulsory membership of all owners of lots and/or dwelling units and flexibility of assessments to meet changing costs of maintenance, repairs, and services. Recorded CC&R's shall permit enforcement by the City for provisions required as Conditions of Approval. The developer shall submit evidence of compliance with this requirement to, and receive approval of, the city prior to making any such sale. This condition shall not apply to land dedicated to the City for public purposes. iii. Every owner of a dwelling unit or lot shall own as an appurtenance to such dwelling unit or let, either (1) an undivided interest in the common areas and facilities, or (2) a share in the corporation, or voting membership in an association owning the common areas and facilities. Prior to Issuance of Building Permits 12. The applicant shall conduct an acoustical study to ensure acceptable interior and exterior noise standards pursuant to the General Plan noise levels for residential and commercial structures. All recommend construction techniques, improvements and/or walls recommended in the acoustical report shall be incorporated into the construction of the structures and subdivision. 13. The following shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division: Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans. The location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Landscaping Ordinance. The cover page shall identify the total square footage of the landscaped area for the site. The plans shall be accompanied by the following items: R:\S P~Harveston SP~PC Docs\29929-COA,doc 1) Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal). 2) One (1) copy of the approved grading plan. 3) Water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water Efficient Ordinance). 4) Automatic irrigation for all landscaped areas and complete screening of all ground mounted equipment from the view of the public from streets and adjacent property for.' i. Front yards and slopes within individual lots pnor to issuance of occupancy permits for any lot(s). ii. Private common areas prior to issuance of occupancy permits. iii. All landscaping excluding Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) maintained areas and front yard landscaping which shall include, but may not be limited to private slopes and common areas. iv. Shrub planting to completely screen perimeter walls adjacent to a public right-of-way equal to sixty-six (66) feet or larger. v. All street frontage of school sites along General Plan and Specific Plan designated roadways. Wall and Fence Plans consistent with the Harveston Specific Plan and the Conceptual Landscape Plan. Precise Grading Plans consistent with the approved rough grading plans including all structural setback measurements. 14. Roof-mounted mechanical equipment shall not be permitted within the subdivision, however solar equipment or any other energy saving devices shall be permitted with Director of Planning approval. Prior to Issuance of Occupancy Permits 15. If deemed necessary by the Director of Planning, the applicant shall provide additional landscaping to effectively screen various components of the project. 16. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall be installed consistent with the approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Director of Planning. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working order. 17. 18. R:\S l~Harvestoa SP~PC Docs\29929-COA.doc Front yard and slope landscaping within individual lots shall be completed for inspection prior to issuance of each occupancy permit (excluding model home complex structures). All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT The Department of Public Works recommends the following Conditions of Approval for this project. Unless stated otherwise, all conditions shall be completed by the Developer at no cost to any Government Agency. General Requirements 19. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the tentative map all existing and proposed easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and revision. 20. A Grading Permit for either rough or precise grading shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained road right-of-way. 21. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way. 22. All improvement plans, grading plans, landscape and irrigation plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars. Prior to Approval of the Final Map, unless other timing is indicated, the Developer shall complete the following or have plans submitted and approved, subdivision improvement agreements executed and securities posted: 23. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: a. San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board b. Rancho California Water District c. Eastern Municipal Water District d. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District e. City of Temecula Fire Prevention Bureau f. Planning Department g. Department of Public Works h. Riverside County Health Department i. Cable TV Franchise j. Community Services District R:kS P~Haxveston SPxPC DocsL29929-COA.doc 5 k. General Telephone I. Southern California Edison Company m. Southern California Gas Company 24. The Developer shall construct the following public improvements to City of Temecula General Plan standards unless otherwise noted. Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works: Improve Street "AA" from Street "EE" to Harveston Drive - (Modified Street Section per the Specific Plan - 66' RNV) to include dedication of full width street right-of-way, installation of full width street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer). Improve Street "DD" (Modified Street Section per the Specific Plan - 60' R/W) 1o include dedication of full width street right-of-way, installation of full width street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer) Improve Streets "AA", "CC", "EE", "FF", and "GG" (Modified Street Section per the Specific Plan - 56' R/W) to include dedication of full width street right-of-way, installation of full width street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer). 25. Improve Street "BB" (Modified Street Section per the Specific Plan - 46.5' R/W) to include dedication of full width street right-of-way, installation of full width street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer). All street improvement design shall provide adequate right-of-way and pavement transitions per Caltrans standards for transition to existing street sections. Unless otherwise approved the following minimum criteria shall be observed in the design of the street improvement plans: Street centerline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over A.C. paving. b. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City Standard Nos. 207 and/or 207A Streetlights shall be installed along the public streets and shall be designed in accordance with Specific Plan Standards. Concrete sidewalks shall be constructed in accordance with City Standard Nos. 400 and 401 or as modified in the Specific Plan to 5' width. e. Design of street improvements shall extend a minimum of 300 feet beyond the project boundaries to ensure adequate continuity of design with adjoining properties. R:\S P~Harveston SI~PC Docs\29929-COA.doc 6 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. f. Minimum centerline radii shall be in accordance with City Standard No. 113. g. All reverse curves shall include a 100-foot minimum tangent section. h. All street and driveway centeriine intersections shall be at 90 degrees. i. All knuckles shall be constructed in accordance with City Standards No. 602 j. All cul-de-sacs shall be constructed in accordance with City Standards No. 600 All units shall be provided with zero clearance garage doors and garage door openers if the driveway is less than 18 feet in depth from back of sidewalk. Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility. All utility systems including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer, and cable TV shall be provided underground. Easements shall be provided as required where adequate right-of-way does not exist for installation of the facilities. All utilities shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City Codes and the utility provider. Ail utilities, except electrical lines rated 33kv or greater, shall be installed underground A construction area Traffic Control Plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and reviewed by the Department of Public Works for any street closure and detour or other disruption to traffic circulation as required by the Department of Public Works. Relinquish and waive right of access to and from Harveston Drive on the Final Map with the exception of any opening(s) as delineated on the approved Tentative Tract Map. Corner property line cut off for vehicular sight distance and installation of pedestrian facilities shall be provided at afl street intersections in accordance with Riverside County Standard No. 805. All easements and/or right-of-way dedications shall be offered for dedication to the public or other appropriate agency and shall continue in force until the City accepts or abandons such offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the Department of Public Works. Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid. An Environmental Constraints Sheet (ECS) shall be prepared in conjunction with the Final Map to delineate identified environmental concerns and shall be recorded with the map. A copy of the ECS shall be transmitted to the Planning Department for review and approval. The Developer shall comply with all constraints, which may be shown upon an Environmental Constraint Sheet recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject property. R:\S P~tarveston SPXPC DocsL29929-COA.doc 7 33. The Developer shall notify the City's cable TV Franchises of the Intent to Develop. Conduit shall be installed to cable TV Standards at time of street improvements. 34. A 20 foot easement shall be dedicated for public utilities and emergency vehicle access for all private streets and drives. 35. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be required and shall be delineated and noted on the final map. 36. Easements, when required for roadway slopes, landscape easements, drainage facilities, utilities, etc., shall be shown on the final map if they are located within the land division boundary. All offers of dedication and conveyances shall be submitted for review and recorded as directed by the Department of Public Works. On-site drainage facilities located outside of road right-of-way shall be contained within drainage easements and shown on the final map. A note shall be added to the final map stating, "drainage easements shall be kept free of buildings and obstructions." Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits 37. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: a. San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board b. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District c. Planning Department d. Department of Public Works e. Riverside County Health Department f. Community Services District 38. 39. 40. A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in accordance with City of Temecula standards and approved by the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any grading. The plan shall incorporate adequate erosion control measures to protect the site and adjoining properties from damage due to erosion. A Soils Report shall be prepared by a registered Civil or Soils Engineer and submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and preliminary pavement sections. A Geotechnical Report shall be prepared by a registered engineer or engineering geologist and submitted to the Department of public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address special study zones and identify any geotechnical hazards for the site including location of faults and potential for liquefaction. The report shall include recommendations to mitigate the impact of ground shaking and liquefaction. R:\S I&Ha~veston SI)~PC Docs\29929-COA doc 8 41. 42. A Drainage Study shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The study shall identify storm water runoff quantities expected from the development of this site and upstream of the site. It shall identify all existing or proposed off-site or on-site, public or private, drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. Runoff shall be conveyed to an adequate outfall capable of receiving the storm water runoff without damage to public or private property. The study shall include a capacity analysis verifying the adequacy of all facilities. Any upgrading or upsizing of drainage facilities necessary to convey the storm water runoff shall be provided as part of development of this project. The basis for analysis and design shall be a storm with a recurrence interval of one hundred years. The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or the project is shown to be exempt. 43. The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works. 44. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by either cashier's check or money order, prior to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area drainage plan fee. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid. 45. The Developer shall obtain letters of approval or easements for any off-site work performed on adjoining properties. The letters or easements shall be in a format as directed by the Department of Public Works. 46. All lot drainage shall be directed to the driveway by side yard drainage swales independent of any other lot. Prior to Issuance of Building Permits 47. Final Map shall be approved and recorded. 48. A Precise Grading Plan shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval. The building pad shaJl be certified by a registered Civil Engineer for location and elevation, and the Soils Engineer shall issue a Final Soils Report addressing compaction and site conditions. 49. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the California Building Code, the approved grading plan, the conditions of the grading permit, City Grading Standards and accepted grading construction practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved rough grading plan. 50. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06 unless otherwise provided for by a written agreement between the City and the Developer. R:~S PXHarveston SPXPC Docs~29929-COA.doc 9 Prior to Issuance of Certificates of Occupancy 51. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: a. Rancho California Water District b. Eastern Municipal Water District c. Department of Public Works 52. All necessary certifications and clearances from engineers, utility companies and public agencies shall be submitted as required by the Department of Public Works. 53. All improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and City standards to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. 54. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken due to the construction operations of this project shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT General Requirements 55. All slope/landscape plans submitted for consideration shall be in conformance with the City of Temecula Landscape and Irrigation Specifications and Installation Details and Park Land and Landscape Dedication Process. 56. All perimeter slope and parkway landscaping, designated as Temecula Community Services Department (TCSD) maintenance areas shall be identified and offered for dedication to the TCSD as a maintenance easement on the final map. Underlying ownership of the respective areas shall remain with the individual property owner or the Homeowner's Association. All other landscape areas, open space, entry monumentation, signage, pedestrian portals, bus shelters and walls shall be maintained by the Homeowners Association (HOA), private maintenance association or property owner. 57. Construction of the proposed TCSD landscape maintenance areas shall commence pursuant to a pre-construction meeting with the developer and TCSD Maintenance Superintendent. Failure to comply with the TCSD review and inspection process may preclude acceptance of these areas into the TCSD maintenance programs. 58. The developer, the developer's successor or assignee, shall be responsible for all maintenance of the slopes/landscaping areas until such time as those responsibilities are accepted by the TCSD or other responsible party. 59. Class II bicycle lanes on both sides of the Loop Road (Harveston Drive) shall be identified on the street improvement plans and constructed in concurrence with the completion of said street improvements. R:~S PXHarveston SPXPC Docs~29929-COA.doc 60. The developer is entitled to receive a credit against the park component of the City's Development Impact Fee (DIF) based upon the actual cost of improving the community park as identified in Planning Area 1 of the Harveston Specific Plan. The fee/credit issue shall be addressed pursuant to the execution of a Development Agreement or a Park Improvement Agreement between the applicant and the City prior to approval of the final map. Prior to Approval of the Final Map 61. All areas intended for dedication to the TCSD for maintenance shall be identified on the final map by numbered lots with the square footage of said lot numbers indexed as proposed TCSD maintenance areas. 62. All TCSD slope/landscaping maintenance easements shall be offered for dedication on the final map. 63. Landscape construction drawings for all proposed TCSD slope/landscape maintenance areas shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Services. 64. The developer shall post security and enter into an agreement to improve all proposed TCSD maintenance areas. 65. The developer shall file a notice of intention with the Temecula Community Services District to initiate election proceedings for acceptance of residential street lights and perimeter slope/landscape into the respective TCSD maintenance programs. All costs associated with this process shall be borne by the developer. Prior to Issuance of Building Permits 66. Prior to the installation of street lights or issuance of building permits, whichever comes first, the developer shall file an application and pay the appropriate fees to the TCSD for the dedication of arterial and residential street lights into the appropriate TCSD maintenance program. Prior to Issuance of Certificates of Occupancy 67. Prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy within each phase map, the developer shall submit the most current list of Assessor's Parcel Numbers assigned to the final project. 68. It shall be the developer's responsibility to provide written disclosure of the existence of TCSD and its service level rates and charges to all prospective purchasers. FIRE DEPARTMENT The following are the Fire Department Conditions of Approval for this project. All questions regarding the meaning of these conditions shall be referred to the Fire Prevention Bureau. 69. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the R:\S ~Harveston SP'xPC Docs~29929-COA.doc 11 70. 71. 72. 73. 74. 75. 76. California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in force at the time of building plan submittal. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for residential land division per CFC Appendix III.A, Table A-Ill-A-1. The developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 1500 GPM at 20-PSI residual operating pressure with a 2-hour duration. The required fire flow may be adjusted during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire Flow as given above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC 903.2, Appendix i l-A) The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC Appendix III.B, Table A-III-B-1. Standard fire hydrants (6" x 4" x 2 1/2" outlets) shall be located on Fire Department access roads and adjacent public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 500 feet apart, at each intersection and shall be located no more than 250 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required. (CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for commercial land division per CFC Appendix Ill-A, Table A-III-A-1. The developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 4000 GPM at 20-PSI residual operating pressure with a 4 hour duration. The required fire flow may be adjusted during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire Flow as given above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC 903.2, Appendix Ill-A) The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC Appendix Ill-B, Table A-III-B-1. Super fire hydrants (6" x 4" x 2-2 1/2" outlets) shall be located on Fire Department access roads and adjacent public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 350 feet apart, at each intersection and shall be located no more than 210 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required. (CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix Maximum cul-de-sac length shall not exceed 1320 feet. Minimum turning radius on any cul-de-sac shall be thirty-seven (37) feet for residential and forty-five (45) feet for commercial. (CFC 902.2.2.3, CFC 902.2.2.4) If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection prior to any building construction. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2) Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent roads are installed. Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface for 80,000 lbs. GVW. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2) R:XS P~-Iarveston SP~PC Docs~29929-COA.doc 12 77. Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved Fire Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or any portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface designed for 80,900 lbs. GVW with a minimum AC thickness of .25 feet. (CFC sec 902) 78. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have a clear paved section of thirty-six (36) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13) feet six (6) inches. (CFC 902.2.2.1) 79. Private roads and alleys may be as narrow as 20 feet unobstructed travel width, not including any parking with Fire Prevention approval on a map by map basis. On this map these are approved where homes also face a public road. 80. Prior to building construction, dead end road ways and streets in excess of one hundred and fifty (150) feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of accommodating fire apparatus. (CFC 902.2.2.4) 81. Prior to building construction, this development and any street within serving more than 35 homes or any commercial developments shall have two (2) points of access, via all- weather surface roads, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 902.2.1) Where phasing affects planned road connections temporary construction roads may serve as the second point of access. 82. Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall be: signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature block; and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. After the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be presented to the Fire Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system including fire hydrants shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building materials being placed on an individual lot. (CFC 8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and National Fire Protection Association 24 1-4.1) 83. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective Markers" shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations. (CFC 901.4.3) 84. All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry system for emergency access by firefighting personnel. (CFC 902.4) Special Conditions 85. Prior to construction of roads a simple map in an electronic file of the .DWG format must be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau. Alternative file formats may be acceptable, contact fire prevention for approval. BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT 86. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 1998 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 1998 National Electrical Code; R:\S P~larveston SP'~PC Docs~29929-COA.doc 13 California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy and Disabled Access Regulations and the Temecula Municipal Code. 87. Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plans showing compliance with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All street lights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way. 88. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted to the Building & Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School Mitigation Fees. 89. Obtain all plan checks and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. 90. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review. 91. Disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of any public building is required. The path of travel shall meet the California Disabled Access Regulations in terms of cross slope, travel slope stripping and signage. Provide all details on plans (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1, 1998). 92. All public building and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations. Provide all details on plans. (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1, 1998). 93. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans submitted for plan review. 94. Provide electrical plan including Icad calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic and mechanical plan for plan review. 95. Truss calculations that are stamped by the engineer of record and the truss manufacturer engineer are required for plan review submittal. 96. 97. Provide precise grading plan for plan check submittal to check for handicap accessibility. Show all building setbacks 98. Post conspicuously at the entrance to the project the hours of construction as allowed by City of Temecula Ordinance #0-90-04, and specifically Section G (1) of the Riverside County Ordinance # 457.73, for any site within one-quarter mile of an occupied residence. Construction hours are as follows: Monday - Friday Saturday 6:30 a.m. - 6:30 p.m. 7;00 a.m. - 6:30 p.m. No work is permitted on Sunday or Government Code Holidays R:\S l:SHarveston SP~PC Docs't29929-COA.doc OTHER AGENCIES 99. Flood protection shall be provided in accordance with the Riverside County Flood Control District's transmittal dated February 25, 2001, a copy of which is attached. The fee is made payable to the Riverside County Flood Control Water District by either a cashier's check or money order, prior to the issuance of a grading permit (unless deferred to a later date by the District), based upon the prevailing area drainage plan fee. 100. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the County of Riverside Department of Environmental Health's transmittal dated February 22, 2001, a copy of which is attached. 101. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Rancho California Water District's transmittal dated January 25, 2001, a copy of which is attached. 102. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Riverside Transit Agency transmittal dated May 31,2001, a copy of which is attached. By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be subject to Community Development Department approval. Applicant Signature R:\S PXHa:veston SPXPC Docs\29929-COA doc DAVID P. ZAPPE General Manager-Chief Engineer 51180.1 · RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTRO AND WATER CONSERVATION DIS] City of Temecula ~, ~, ~.~ Planning Department Post Office Box 9033 Temecula, Califomia 92589-9033, Ladles and Gentlemen: Re: ,7-'r'M The Distdct does not normally recommend conditions for land divisions or other land use-cases in incorporated cities. The Distdct also does not nlan check city land use cases, or provide State Division of Real Estate letters or other flood hazard reports for sucl~ cases. Distnct comments/recommendations for such cases are normally limited to items of specific ~nterest to the District including Distdct Master Drainage Plan facilities, other re ional flood control and drainage facilities which could be censidered a logical componenfor extension of a master ;~l~n s stem, and District Area Dra nage Plan fees (development mitigation fees)· In addition, informer on of a general nS~)t/uSre is provided. - __ ._ The District has not reviewed the proposed project in detail and the following checked comments do not in any way constitute or imp y Distdct approval or endorsement of the proposed project with respect to flood hazard, public hea th and safety or any other such issue: I,,,'"" This pr.oject would not be impacted by District Master Drainage Plan facilities nor are other facilities of regional Interest proposed. This project invo vas District Master Plan facilities. The District will accept ownership of such facilities on written request of the City. Fac ties must be constructed to District standards, and District plan check and inspection will be required for Distdct acceptance. Plan check, inspection and administrabve fees will be required. This project proposes channe s, storm drains 36 inches or larger in diameter, or other facilities that could be considered regional in nature and/or a logical extension of the adopted Master Drainage Plan. The District would] consider accepting ownershil~ 0t such facilities on written request of the City. Facilities must be constructed to District standards, and District plan check and inspection will I./ be required for District acceptance. Plan check, inspection and administrativ~ fees will be required. c~l~his, proje~ is I. ocate, d within the limits of the District's ~Ul~.p,l~;'rl~ alnage Plan ror which drainage fees have been ad,,,-~-,,~' ~-~.I'-,-,-':"---¥'~'-'~./"Y?"' ~' ,-~r..~,~ Area ack or mona order only to the Flood Control . -.,,~,,~,~, ~,p,!,-~u~u ~ees s quip be paia BY cashier's whichever com~s first Fees to be "aid shoal,~ ~.~D_i,s!n~_ct__p,no.r tb}.ss.uan, c..e of. ~u(,Id!ng or grad,ng perm ts, permit · ~, u u= ~ ~HU rare In e]Tect a! me rime or ssuance of the actual GENERAL INFORMATION This project may require a Nationa Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Con[roi Board. Clearance for grading, recordation or other final approval ~hould not be given until the City has determined that the project has been granted a perm t or is shown to be exempt.- If this project involves a Federal Emergen~'y Management Agency (FEMA) mapped flood plain, then the Ci should require the applicant to provide all studies, calculations, plans and other iriformation reqUired to me~ FEMA requirements, and should further require that the applicant obtain a Conditional Letter of Map Rev s on CLOMR) prior to grading, recordation or other final approval of the project, and a Letter of Map Revis on (LOMR(~ prior to occupancy. If a natural watercourse or mapped flood plain is impacted by this project, the City should require the a licant to obtain a Section 1601/1603 Agreement fr~m the California Department of Fish and Game and a Clean P~ater Act Section 404 Permit from the U.S Army Corps of Engineers, or written correspondence from these a encies indicating the prgject is exempt from these requirements. A Clean Water Act Sectioh 401 Water Quail Cert~cetion may be required from the local California Rag onal Water Quality Control Board prior to issuance of ~e permit. Corps 404 1995 MARKET STREET RIVERSIDE, CA 92501 909/955-1200 909/788-9965 FAX Very truly yours, STUART E. MCKIBBIN Senior Ci~l Eng. in~eer Date: ~ ~City of Temecula Plannit Page Two Attn: Patty Anders February 22, 200l This subdivision is within the Eastern Municipal Water District and shall be connected to the sewers of the District. The sewer system shall be installed according to plans and specifications as approved by the District, the City of Temecula and the Environmental Health Department. Permanent prints of the plans of the sewer system shall be submitted in triplicate, along with the original drawing, to the City of Temecula. The prints shall show the internal pipe diameter, location of manholes, complete profiles, pipe and joint specifications and the size of the sewers at the junction of the new system to the existing system. A single plat indicating location of sewer lines and waterlines shall be a portion of the sewage plans and profiles. The plans shall be signed by a registered engineer and the sewer district with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the sewer system in Tentative Tract Map No. 29929 is in accordance with the sewer system expansion plans of the Eastern Municipal Water District and that the waste disposal system is adequate at this time to treat the anticipated wastes from the proposed Tract Map". The plans must be submitted to the City of Temecula's Office to review at least two weeks PRIOR to the request for the recordation of the final map. It will be necessary for financial arrangements to be completely finalized PRIOR to recordation of the final map. It will be necessary for the am~exation proceedings to be completely finalized PRIOR to the recordation of the final map. Additional approval from Riverside County Enviroi~rnental Health Department will be required for all tenants operating a food facility or generating any hazardous waste. Sincerely, Sam Mart~nviromnental Health Specialist SM:dr (909) 955-8980 HEAL'SERVICES OF RIVERSIDE. AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH .February 22,200l City of Temecula Planning Department P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 ATTN: Patty Anders, Associate Planner RE: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 29929: RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. (1 LOTS) CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF Dear Gentlemen: I. The Department of Environmental Health has reviewed Tentative Tract Map No. 29929 and recommends: A water system shall be installed according to plans and specifications as approved by the water company and the Environmental Health Department. Permanent prints of the plans of the water system shall be submitted in triplicate, with a minimum scale not less than one-inch equal's 200 feet, along with the original drawing to the City of Temecula. The prints shall show the internal pipe diameter, location of valves and fire hydrants; pipe and joint specifications, and the size of the main at the junction of the new system to the existing system. The plans shall comply in all respects with Div. 5, Part 1, and Chapter 7 of the California Health and Safety Code, California Administrative Code, Title 11, Chapter 16, and General Order No. 103 of the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California, when applicable. The plans shall be signed by a registered engineer and water company with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system in Tentative Tract Map No. 29929 is in accordance with the water system expansion plans of the Rancho California Water District and that the water services, storage, and distribution system will be adequate to provide water service to such Tract Map". This certification does not constitute a guarantee that it wilI supply water to such Tract Map at any specific quantities, flows or pressures for fire protection or any other purpose. This certification shall be signed by a responsible official of the water company. The plans must be submitted to the City of Temecula's Ofrice to review at least TWO WEEKS PRIOR to the request for the recordation 'of the final map. This subdivision has a statement from Rancho California Water District agreeing to serve domestic water to each and every lot in the subdivision on demand providing satisfactory financial arrangements are completed with the subdivider. It will be necessary for financial arrangements to be made PRIOR to the recordation of the fina! map. Local Enforcement Agency * EO. Box 1280, Riverside, CA 92502-1280 * (909) 955-8982 * FAX (909) 781-9653 * 4080 Lemon Street, 9th Floor, Rivemide, CA 92501 Land Use and Water Engineering * PO. Box 1206, Riverside, CA 92502-1206 * (909) 955-8980 * FAX (909) 955-8903 * 4080 Lemon Street, 2nd Floon Riversid~ CA c~9~al Ralph H. Daily .Lisa D. Herman Csaba F. Ko Scott Ps. Mclntyre January 25, 2001 Patty Anders, Case Planner City of Temecula Plmming Department 43200 Business Park Drive Post Office Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 JAN 2 9ZO0~ ~ 9y_ SUBJECT: WATER AVAILABILITY TRACT NO. 29929 }IAR_VE~STON SPECIFIC. PLAN PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA01-0031 Dear Ms. Anders: Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located within the boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD). Water service, therefore, would be available upon completion of financial arrangements between RCWD and the property owner. If fire protection is required, the customer will need to contact RCWD for fees and requirements. Water availability would be contingent upon the property owner signing an Agency Agreement that assigns water management rights, if any, to RCWD. C. MiehaelCowett In our previous correspondence to Debbie Ubnoske dated December 5, 2000, ~,~,t*K,XegernU' RCWD requested that the developer consider the use of recycled water for the proposed pond to be located in this development and for any other appropriate uses. We request that the dewdoper discuss these requirements with RCWD staff. If you should have any questions, please contact an Engineering Services Representative at this office. Sincerely, RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT Steve Brannon, P.E. Development Engineering Manager 01 \SB :at028~012-T I\FCF RTfl ID:90968410O7 MAY ~1'01 9:14 No.O01P.02 May 31,2001 .l Rivenddo Transit Agency 1825 Third Slreel P.O. BOX 59968 Riverside, CA 92517 Phone:(909) 684-0850 Fax: (909) S~4-1007 City of Tem¢cula Planning Department I met recently with Matt Fagan to discuss the Narvcston Specific Plan. It appears that ali attempts have been made to design thc project in a transit-friendly rammer, including the open-ended clustering o£resldentlal units. The mixe&uses in the Village Green Center · are also conducive to transit usage.. We hope to jointly design a pilot program to encourage transit usage and thc usc of other alternatives lo the single occupancy vehicle. It would be beneficial for the community to provide transit access to adjacent areas, such as thc Promenade Mall, middle and high schools and local employment centers. Please continue to keep os posted so we can maximize coordination ofplanning efforts. Thank you for the opportunity to common! on this project. A'I-I'ACHMENT NO 9 DRAFT RESOLUTION APPROVING 'I-FM 30088 R:\S P~Harveston SPeCify CounciI~STAFFRPT 7-24-01.doc Attachment No. 9 RESOLUTION NO. 01- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 01-0032 - TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 30088, THE SUBDIVISION OF APPROXIMATELY 9.18 ACRES INTO 38 RESIDENTIAL LOTS AND 8 OPEN SPACE LOTS IN A PORTION OF PLANNING AREA 4 OF THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN; LOCATED EAST OF INTERSTATE 15, NORTH OF SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK, WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD AND SOUTH OF THE NORTHERN CITY LIMIT, AND FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NOS. 911-630-001,911-630-002 AND 911-180-015 WHEREAS, Lennar Communities filed Planning Application No. PA 01-0032 (Tentative Tract Map 30088 the "Application") in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan, Development Code and Subdivision Ordinance; WHEREAS, the Application was processed including, but not limited to public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application on June 20, 2001, and July 12, 2001 at duly noticed public hearings as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did, testify either in support or opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearings and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission recommended approval of the Application subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder; WHEREAS, the City Council considered the Application on July 24, 2001, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support or opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Council hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Council approved of the Application, and certified the Environmental Impact Report and adopted the Mitigation Monitoring Program after finding that the project proposed in the Application conformed to the City of Temecula General Plan; WHEREAS, all legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by reference. R:~S P~-larveston SPXCity Council~30088--CC RESO.doc 1 Section 2. Findinqs. That the City Council, in approving the Application, hereby makes the following findings as required in Section 16.09.140 of the Temecula Municipal Code. A. The proposed subdivision and the design and improvements of the subdivision is consistent with the Development Code, General Plan, any applicable specific plan and the City of Temecula Municipal Code; B. The proposed subdivision map is consistent with the subject specific plan and related General Plan Amendment. C. The tentative map does not propose to divide land which is subject to a contract entered into pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965, or the land is subject to a Land Conservation Act contract but the resulting parcels following division of the land will not be too small to sustain their agricultural use; D. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development proposed by the tentative map; E. The design of the subdivisions and the proposed improvements, with conditions of approval, are not likely to cause significant environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat as no sensitive species or habitant exist within the project boundaries; F. An environmental impact report has been prepared and a finding has been made, pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081(a) (3), finding that specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the environmental impact report; G. The design of the subdivisions and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems; H. The design of the subdivisions provides for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision to the extent feasible; I. The design of the subdivisions and the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision, or the design of the alternate easements which are substantially equivalent to those previously acquired by the public will be provided. J. The subdivisions are consistent with the City's parkland dedication requirements (Quimby). Section 3. Environmental Compliance. Residential projects approved under a Specific Plan are exempt from further environmental review pursuant to Section 15182 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines. All environmental impacts were previously identified and in the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) and Mitigation Monitoring Program in order to approve the project. R:~S P~Harveston SP~City CouncilX30088--CC RESO.doc 2 Section 4. Conditions. The City Council of the City of Temecula approves Planning Application No. PA 01-0032 (Tentative Tract Map 30088), the subdivision of approximately 9.18 acres into 38 residential lots and 8 open space lots in a portion of Planning Area 4, located within the Harveston Specific Plan subject to the project specific conditions set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference together with any and all other necessary conditions that may be deemed necessary, for the property located east of Interstate 15, north or Santa Gertrudis Creek, west of Margarita Road and south or the northern City limit, and further identified as Assessor Parcel Nos. 911-630-001, 911-630-002 and 911-180-015. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council this 24th day of July, 2001. A'I-TEST: Jeff Comerchero, Mayor Susan W. Jones, CMC/AAE City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 2001- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 24th day of July 2001, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC/AAE City Clerk R:XS P~arveston SPXCity CotmcilX30088--CC RESO.doc 3 EXHIBIT A CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TFM 30088 R:~S P~-larveston SP~City CouncilX30088--CC RESO.doc 4 Planning Application No.: EXHIBIT A (Attachment No. 9) CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PA01- 0032 (Tentative Tract Map No. 30088) Project Description: Planning Application No. 01-0032 - Tentative Tract Map No. 30088, the subdivision of approximately 9.18 acres into 38 residential lots and 8 open space lots in a portion of Planning Area 4, located within the Harveston Specific Plan Assessor's Parcel Nos.: 911-630-001,911-630-002 and 911-180-015. Approval Date: Expiration Date: July 24, 2001 July 24, 2003 PLANNING DIVISION General Requirements The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act and to all the requirements of Temecula Subdivision Ordinance, unless modified by the conditions listed below. A time extension may be approved in accordance with the State Map Act and City Ordinance, upon written request, if made 30 days prior to the expiration date. The permittee/applicant shall indemnify, protect and hold harmless, the City and any agency or instrumentality thereof, and/or any of its officers, employees, and agents from any and all claims, actions, or proceedings against the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its officers, employees, and agents, to attack, set aside, void, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting from an approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application which action is brought within the appropriate statute of limitations period and Public Resources Code, Division 13, Chapter 4 (Section 21000 et seq., including but not by the way of limitations Section 21152 and 21167). The City shall promptly notify the permittee/applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding brought forth within this time period. The City shall estimate the cost of the defense of the action and applicant shall deposit said amount with the City. City may require additional deposits to cover anticipated costs. City shall refund, without interest, any unused portions of the deposit once the litigation is finally concluded. Should the City fail to either promptly notify or cooperate fully, permittee/applicant shall not, thereafter be responsible to indemnify, defend, protect, or hold harmless the City, any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its officers, employees, or agents. Should the applicant fail to timely post the required deposit, the Director may terminate the land use approval without further notice to the applicant. 3. This project and all subsequent projects within this site shall be consistent with Specific Plan No. 13, the Harveston Specific Plan. R:~S PXHarvcston SPXPC DocsX30088-COA.doc 1 The project and all subsequent projects within this site shall comply with all mitigation measures identified within the Final Environmental Impact Report for the Harveston Specific Plan, and the approved Mitigation Monitoring Program thereof. Within thirty (30) days of the final approval of the project by the City Council, the map shall be submitted to the Planning Department in final form for review and approval. The final form shall include all conditions of approval and all modifications made by the Planning Commission and City Council. The Developer shall disclose to all home buyers that Date Street is planned to be a six (6) lane urban arterial roadway and will include a freeway interchange pursuant to the City of Temecula General Plan Circulation Element. The approval granted by this Resolution shall become effective upon the Effective Date of the Development Agreement, as the term Effective Date is defined in the Development Agreement adopted concurrently with this Resolution. Notwithstanding any of the conditions contained herein, the Developer and the City may enter into a development agreement, pursuant to Government Code Section 65864 through 65869.5 or other agreement(s) requiring the Developer to: 1) advance the funding or construction of public improvements; 2) redefine the scope of any public improvement; 3) acquire or fund the acquisition of land for public purposes; and 4) waive any right to reimbursement for facilities or the dedication of land. Further, notwithstanding any of the conditions contained herein, Developer may seek an agreement for reimbursement for any improvements or facilities that qualify for reimbursement at such time as the City of Temecula adopts an ordinance for such reimbursement pursuant to and consistent with California Government Code Sections 66485 through 66489, inclusive, and further shall waive the same in the event of agreements, consistent with the foregoing, that require or include any or all of the terms set forth immediately above. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits A copy of the Rough Grading plans shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Division. 10. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that ordinance or by providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid. Prior to Recordation of the Final Map 11. The following shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division: a. A copy of the Final Map. b. A copy of the Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) with the following notes: This property is located within thirty (30) miles of Mount Palomar Observatory. All proposed outdoor lighting systems shall comply with the R:\S P~Harveston SP~PC DocsX30088-COA.doc 2 California Institute of Technology, recommendations, Ordinance No. 655. Palomar Observatory ii. The Harveston Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared for this project and is on file at the City of Temecula Community Development Department ~ Planning Division. c. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&R's) CC&R's shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director. The CC&R's shall include liability insurance and methods of maintaining open space, recreation areas, parking areas, private roads, exterior of all buildings and all landscaped and open areas including parkways. ii. No lot or dwelling unit in the development shall be sold unless a corporation, association, property owner's group or similar entity has been formed with the right to assess all properties individually owned or jointly owned which have any rights or interest in the use of the common areas and common facilities in the development, such assessment power to be sufficient to meet the expenses of such entity, and with authority to control, and the duty to maintain, all of said mutually available features of the development. Such entity shall operate under recorded CC&R's which shall include compulsory membership of all owners of lots and/or dwelling units and flexibility of assessments to meet changing costs of maintenance, repairs, and services. Recorded CC&R's shall permit enforcement by the City for provisions required as Conditions of Approval. The developer shall submit evidence of compliance with this requirement to, and receive approval of, the city prior to making any such sale. This condition shall not apply to land dedicated to the City for public purposes. iii. Every owner of a dwelling unit or lot shall own as an appurtenance to such dwelling unit or lot, either (1) an undivided interest in the common areas and facilities, or (2) a share in the corporation, or voting membership in an association owning the common areas and facilities. Prior to Issuance of Building Permits 12. The applicant shall conduct an acoustical study to ensure acceptable interior and exterior noise standards pursuant to the General Plan noise levels for residential and commercial structures. All recommend construction techniques, improvements and/or wails recommended in the acoustical report shall be incorporated into the construction of the structures and subdivision. 13. The following shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division: Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans. The location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Landscaping Ordinance. The cover page shall identify the total square footage of the landscaped area for the site. The plans shall be accompanied by the following items: R:\S PXHarveston SP~PC Docsk30088-COA,doc 3 i. Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal). ii. One (1) copy of the approved grading plan. iii. Water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water Efficient Ordinance). iv. Automatic irrigation for all landscaped areas and complete screening of all ground mounted equipment from the view of the public from streets and adjacent property for: Front yards and slopes within individual lots prior to issuance of occupancy permits for any lot(s). 2. Private common areas prior to issuance of occupancy permits. All landscaping excluding Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) maintained areas and front yard landscaping which shall include, but may not be limited to private slopes and common areas. All street frontage of school sites along General Plan and Specific Plan designated roadways. Wall and Fence Plans consistent with the Harveston Specific Plan and the Conceptual Landscape Plans Precise Grading Plans consistent with the approved rough grading plans including all structural setback measurements. 14. Roof-mounted mechanical equipment shall not be permitted within the subdivision, however solar equipment or any other energy saving devices shall be permitted with Planning Manager approval. Prior to Issuance of Occupancy Permits 15. If deemed necessary by the Director of Planning, the applicant shall provide additional landscaping to effectively screen various components of the project. 16. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall be installed consistent with the approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Director of Planning. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working order. 17. Front yard and slope landscaping within individual lots shall be completed for inspection prior to each occupancy permit (excluding model home complex structures). 18. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. R:~S P~larveston SPxPC Docsk30088-COA.doc 4 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT The Department of Public Works recommends the following Conditions of Approval for this project. Unless stated otherwise, all conditions shall be completed by the Developer at no cost to any Government Agency. General Requirements 19. it is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the tentative map all existing and proposed easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and revision. 20. A Grading Permit for either rough or precise grading shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained road right-of-way. 21. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way. 22. All improvement plans, grading plans, landscape and irrigation plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars. Prior to Approval of the Final Map, unless other timing is indicated, the Developer shall complete the following or have plans submitted and approved, subdivision improvement agreements executed and securities posted: 23. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: a. San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board b. Rancho California Water District c. Eastern Municipal Water District d. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District e. City of Temecula Fire Prevention Bureau f. Planning Department g. Department of Public Works h. Riverside County Health Department i. Cable TV Franchise j. Community Services District R:\S I~Harvcston SP~PC Docs\30088-COA doc 5 General Telephone Southern California Edison Company Southern California Gas Company 24. The Developer shall construct the following public improvements to City of Temecula General Plan standards unless otherwise noted. Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works: Improve Street "VV" (Modified Street Section per the Specific Plan - 66' R/VV) to include dedication of full width street right-of-way, installation of full width street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer). Improve Streets '~/W", "XX" and "YY" (Modified Street Section per the Specific Plan - 56' R/VV) to include dedication of full width street right-of-way, installation of full width street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer). All street improvement design shall provide adequate right-of-way and pavement transitions per Caltrans standards for transition to existing street sections. A School Zone signing and striping plan, per Caltrans standards, shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer for the school site within this project and included with the street improvement plans for the project. Design shall also include a warrant analysis for a flashing yellow beacon and if warrants are met, shall be installed by the Developer. 25. Unless otherwise approved the following minimum criteria shall be observed in the design of the street improvement plans: Street centerline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over A.C. paving. b. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City Standard No. 207. Streetlights shall be installed along the public streets and shall be designed in accordance with Specific Plan Standards. Concrete sidewalks shall be constructed in accordance with City Standard Nos. 400 and 401or as modified in the Specific Plan to 5' width. Design of street improvements shall extend a minimum of 300 feet beyond the project boundaries to ensure adequate continuity of design with adjoining properties. f. Minimum centerline radii shall be in accordance with City Standard No. 113. g. All reverse curves shall include a 100-foot minimum tangent section. R:XS PXHarveston SP~'C DocsL30088-COA.doc 6 h. All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees. i. All knuckles shall be constructed in accordance with City Standard No. 602 j. All cul-de-sacs shall be constructed in accordance with City Standard No. 600 All units shall be provided with zero clearance garage doors and garage door openers if the driveway is less than 18 feet in depth from back of sidewalk. Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility. All utility systems including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer, and cable TV shall be provided underground. Easements shall be provided as required where adequate right-of-way does not exist for installation of the facilities. All utilities shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City Codes and the utility provider. All utilities, except electrical lines rated 33ky or greater, shall be installed underground 26. A construction area Traffic Control Plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and reviewed by the Department of Public Works for any street closure and detour or other disruption to traffic circulation as required by the Department of Public Works. 27. Relinquish and waive right of access to and from Margarita Road, Harveston School Road and Harveston Drive on Final Map with the exception of 2 opening(s) as delineated on the approved Tentative Tract Map. 28. Corner property line cut off for vehicular sight distance and installation of pedestrian facilities shall be provided at all street intersections in accordance with Riverside County Standard No. 805. 29. All easements and/or right-of-way dedications shall be offered for dedication to the public or other appropriate agency and shall continue in force until the City accepts or abandons such offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the Department of Public Works. 30. Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid. 31. An Environmental Constraints Sheet (ECS) shall be prepared in conjunction with the Final Map to delineate identified environmental concerns and shall be recorded with the map. A copy of the ECS shall be transmitted to the Planning Department for review and approval. 32. The Developer shall comply with all constraints, which may be shown upon an Environmental Constraint Sheet recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject property. 33. The Developer shall notify the City's cable TV Franchises of the Intent to Develop. Conduit shall be installed to cable TV Standards at time of street improvements, R:\S PxHarveston SI~PC Docs~30088-COA.doc 7 34. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be required and shall be delineated and noted on the final map. 35. Easements, when required for roadway slopes, landscape easements, drainage facilities, utilities, etc., shall be shown on the final map if they are located within the land division boundary. All offers of dedication and conveyances shall be submitted for review and recorded as directed by the Department of Public Works. On-site drainage facilities located outside of road right-of-way shall be contained within drainage easements and shown on the final map. A note shall be added to the final map stating, "drainage easements shall be kept free of buildings and obstructions." Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits 36. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: a. San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board b. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District c. Planning Department d. Department of Public Works e. Community Services District 37. A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in accordance with City of Temecula standards and approved by the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any grading. The plan shall incorporate adequate erosion control measures to protect the site and adjoining properties from damage due to erosion. 38. A Soils Report shall be prepared by a registered Civil or Soils Engineer and submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and preliminary pavement sections. 39. A Geotechnical Report shall be prepared by a registered engineer or engineering geologist and submitted to the Department of public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address special study zones and identify any geotechnical hazards for the site including location of faults and potential for liquefaction. The report shall include recommendations to mitigate the impact of ground shaking and ~iquefaction. 40. A Drainage Study shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The study shall identify storm water runoff quantities expected from the development of this site and upstream of the site. It shall identify all existing or proposed off-site or on-site, public or private, drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. Runoff shall be conveyed to an adequate outfall capable of receiving the storm water runoff without damage to public or private property. The study shall include a capacity analysis verifying the adequacy of ali facilities. Any upgrading or upsizing of drainage facilities necessary to convey the R:\S P\Harveston SP~PC DocsX30088 COA.doc storm water runoff shall be provided as part of development of this project. The basis for analysis and design shall be a storm with a recurrence interval of one hundred years. 41. The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOi) has been filed or the project is shown to be exempt. 42. The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works. 43. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by either cashier's check or money order, prior to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area drainage plan fee. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid. 44. The Developer shall obtain letters of approval or easements for any off-site work performed on adjoining properties. The letters or easements shall be in a format as directed by the Department of Public Works. 45. All lot drainage shall be directed to the driveway by side yard drainage swales independent of any other lot. Prior to Issuance of Building Permits 46. Final Map shall be approved and recorded. 47. A Precise Grading Plan shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval. The building pad shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer for location and elevation, and the Soils Engineer shall issue a Final Soils Report addressing compaction and site conditions. 48. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the California Building Code, the approved grading plan, the conditions of the grading permit, City Grading Standards and accepted grading construction practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved rough grading plan. 49. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06 unless otherwise provided for by a written agreement between the City and the Developer. Prior to Issuance of Certificates of Occupancy 50. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: a. Rancho California Water District b. Eastern Municipal Water District R:\S P~Harveston SP~PC Docs~30088-COA.doc 9 51. 52. 53. c. Department of Public Works All necessary certifications and clearances from engineers, utility companies and public agencies shall be submitted as required by the Department of Public Works. All improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and City standards to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken due to the construction operations of this project shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT General Requirements 54. All slope/landscape plans submitted for consideration for TCSD maintenance shall be in conformance with the City of Temecula Landscape and Irrigation Specifications and Installation Details and Park Land and Landscape Dedication Process. 55. All perimeter slope and parkway landscaping, designated as Temecula Community Services Department (TCSD) maintenance areas, shall be identified and offered for dedication to the TCSD as a maintenance easement on the final map. Underlying ownership of the respective areas shall remain with the individual property owner or the Homeowner's Association. All other landscape areas, open space, entry monumentation, signage, pedestrian portals, bus shelters, fences and walls shall be maintained by the Homeowners Association (HCA), private maintenance association or proper~y owner. 56. Construction of the proposed TCSD landscape maintenance areas and landscape medians shall commence pursuant to a pre-construction meeting with the developer and TCSD Maintenance Superintendent. Failure to comply with the TCSD review and inspection process may preclude acceptance of these areas into the TCSD maintenance programs. 57. The developer, the developer's successor or assignee, shall be responsible for all maintenance of the slopes/landscaping areas until such time as those responsibilities are accepted by the TCSD or other responsible party. 58. Class II bicycle lanes on both sides of the Loop Road (Harveston Drive), Harveston School Road and Margarita Road shall be identified on the street improvement plans and constructed in concurrence with the completion of said street improvements. 59. The developer is entitled to receive a credit against the park component of the City's Development Impact Fee (DIF) based upon the actual cost of improving the community park as identified in Planning Area 1 of the Harveston Specific Plan. The fee/credit issue shall be addressed pursuant to the execution of a Development Agreement or a Park Improvement Agreement between the applicant and the City prior to approval of the final map. R:\S PXHarveston SPxPC Docs\30088-COA.doc Prior to Approval of the Final Map 60. All areas intended for dedication to the TCSD for maintenance shall be identified on the final map by numbered lots with the square footage of said lot numbers indexed as proposed TCSD maintenance areas. 61. All TCSD slope/landscaping maintenance easements shall be offered for dedication on the final map. 62. Landscape construction drawings for all proposed TCSD slope/landscape maintenance areas and landscape medians shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Services. 63. The developer shall post security and enter into an agreement to improve all proposed TCSD maintenance areas and landscape medians. 64. The developer shall file a notice of intention with the Temecula Community Services District to initiate election proceedings for acceptance of residential street lights and perimeter slope/landscape into the respective TCSD maintenance programs. All costs associated with this process shall be borne by the developer. Prior to Issuance of Building Permits 65. Prior to the installation of street lights or issuance of building permits, whichever comes first, the developer shall file an application and pay the appropriate fees to the TCSD for the dedication of arterial and residential street lights into the appropriate TCSD maintenance program. Prior to Issuance of Certificates of Occupancy 66. Prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy within each phase map, the developer shall submit the most current list of Assessor's Parcel Numbers assigned to the final project. 67. It shall be the developer's responsibility to provide written disclosure of the existence of TCSD and its service level rates and charges to all prospective purchasers. FIRE DEPARTMENT The following are the Fire Department Conditions of Approval for this project. All questions regarding the meaning of these conditions shall be referred to the Fire Prevention Bureau. 68. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in force at the time of building plan submittal. 69. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for residential land division per CFC Appendix III.A, Table A-III-A-1. The developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 1500 GPM at 20-PSI residual operating pressure with a 2-hour duration. The required fire flow may be adjusted during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire R:\S P~Harveston SP~t'C DocsX30088~OA.doc 11 protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire Flow as given above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC 903.2, Appendix 70. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC Appendix III.B, Table A-III-B-1. Standard fire hydrants (6" x 4" x 2 1/2" outlets) shall be located on Fire Department access roads and adjacent public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 500 feet apart, at each intersection and shall be located no more than 250 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required. (CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix 71. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for commercial land division per CFC Appendix Iii-A, Table A-Ill-A-1. The developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 4000 GPM at 20-PSI residual operating pressure with a 4 hour duration. The required fire flow may be adjusted during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire Flow as given above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC 903.2, Appendix 72. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC Appendix III-B, Table A-III-B-1. Super fire hydrants (6" x 4" x 2-2 1/2" outlets) shall be located on Fire Department access roads and adjacent public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 350 feet apart, at each intersection and shall be located no more than 210 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required. (CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix IH-B) · 73. Maximum cul-de-sac length shall not exceed 1320 feet. Minimum turning radius on any cul-de-sac shall be thirty-seven (37) feet for residential and forty-five (45) feet for commercial. (CFC 902.2.2.3, CFC 902.2.2.4) 74. If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection prior to any building construction. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2) 75. Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent roads are installed. Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface for 80,000 lbs. GVVV. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2) 76. Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved Fire Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or any portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface designed for 80,000 lbs. GVVV with a minimum AC thickness of .25 feet. ( CFC sec 902) 77. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have a clear paved section of thirty-six (36) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13) feet six (6) inches. (CFC 902.2.2.1) R:\S P~Harveston SP~PC DocsX30088-COA.doc 12 78. Private roads and alleys may be as narrow as 20 feet unobstructed travel width, not including any parking with Fire Prevention approval on a map by map basis. On this map these are approved where homes also face a public road. 79. Prior to building construction, dead end road ways and streets in excess of one hundred and fifty (150) feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of accommodating fire apparatus. (CFC 902.2.2.4) 80. Prior to building construction, this development and any street within serving more than 35 homes or any commercial developments shall have two (2) points of access, via all- weather surface roads, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 902.2.1) Where phasing affects planned road connections temporary construction roads may serve as the second point of access. 81. Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall be: signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature block; and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. After the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be presented to the Fire Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system including fire hydrants shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building materials being placed on an individual lot. (CFC 8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and National Fire Protection Association 24 1-4.1 ) 82. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective Markers" shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations. (CFC 901.4.3) 83. All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry system for emergency access by firefighting personnel. (CFC 902.4) Special Conditions 84. Prior to construction of roads a simple map in an electronic file of the .DWG format must be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau. Alternative file formats may be acceptable, contact fire prevention for approval. BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT 85. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 1998 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 1998 National Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy and Disabled Access Regulations and the Temecula Municipal Code. 86. Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plans showing compliance with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All street lights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way. R:~S P~Harveston SI~PC Docsk3008842OA.doc 13 87. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted to the Building & Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School Mitigation Fees. 88. Obtain all plan checks and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. 89. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review. 90. Disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of any public building is required. The path of travel shall meet the California Disabled Access Regulations in terms of cross slope, travel slope stripping and signage. Provide all details on plans (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1, 1998). 91. All public building and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations. Provide all details on plans. (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1, 1998). 92. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans submitted for plan review. 93. Provide electrical plan including Icad calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic and mechanical plan for plan review. 94. Truss calculations that are stamped by the engineer of record and the truss manufacturer engineer are required for plan review submittal. 95. Provide precise grading plan for plan check submittal to check for handicap accessibility. 96. Show all building setbacks 97. Post conspicuously at the entrance to the project the hours of construction as allowed by City of Temecula Ordinance #0-90-04, and specifically Section G (1) of the Riverside County Ordinance Cf 457.73, for any site within one-quarter mile of an occupied residence. Construction hours are as follows: Monday - Friday Saturday 6:30 a.m. - 6:30 p.m. 7:00 a.m. - 6:30 p.m. No work is permitted on Sunday or Government Code Holidays OTHER AGENCIES 98. Flood protection shall be provided in accordance with the Riverside County Flood Control District's transmittal dated February 25, 2001, a copy of which is attached. The fee is made payable to the Riverside County Flood Control Water District by either a cashier's check or money order, prior to the issuance of a grading permit (unless deferred to a later date by the District), based upon the prevailing area drainage plan fee. R:~S PXHarveston SPXPC DocsL30088-COA.doc 99. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the County of Riverside Department of Environmental Health's transmittal dated February 22, 2001, a copy of which is attached. 100. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Rancho California Water District's transmittal dated January 25, 2001, a copy of which is attached. 101. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Riverside Transit Agency transmittal dated May 31,2001, a copy of which is attached. By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be subject to Community Development Department approval. Applicant Signature R:kS P~-larveston SPXPC DocsL30088-COA.doc 15 DAVID P. ZAPPE General Manager-Chief Engineer  1995 MARKET STREET RIVERSIDE, CA 92501 909/955-1200 909/788-9965 FAX 51180.1 RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL · AND WATER CONSERVATION DISq City of Temecula ~ ~ - Planning Department ~ 3 Post Office Box 9033 ~ ~ ~: C,C.~ Temecula, California 92589-9033 ~ ¥'C.u ' Attention: P.q TT "'/ ~1~ ~ E, ~-~ ~ Ladies and Gentleme/n: Re: "~'P'/ ~1 The District does not normally recommend conditions for land divisions or other land~" '/use cases in incorporated cities. The Distdct also does not plan check city land use cases, or provide State Division of Real Estate letters or other flood hazard reports for such cases District Comments/recommendations for such cases are normally limited to items of specific interest to the District inc ud ng Distdct Master Drainage Plan facilities, other regional flood control and drainage facilities which could be considered a logical componenfor extension of a master plan system, and Distdct Area Drainage P an fees (development mitigation fees). In addition, nformation of a general nature is -- provided The Distdct has not reviewed the proposed project in detail and the following checked comments do not in any way constitute or imply Distdct approval or endorsement of the proposed project with respect to flood hazard, public health and safety or any other such issue: This prpject would not be impacted by District Master Drainage Plan facilities nor are other facilities of regional interest proposed. This project involves Distdct Master Plan facilities. The District will accept ownership of such facilities on wdtten request of the C ty Fac t es must be constructed to District standards, and Distdct plan check and inspection will be requ red for Distdct acceptance. Plan check, inspection and administrabve fees will be required. This p~'oject proposes channels, storm dra ns 36 inches or larger in diameter, or other facilities that could be considered regional in nature and/or a logical extension of the adopted Master Drainage Plan. The Distdct would consider accepting ownership ot such taal~t~es on written request of the City. Facilities must be constructed to District standards, and D~stdct plan check and inspection will be required for Distdct acceptance. Plan check, inspection and administrative fees will be required. v~ T,T,h_is' proje~ is locate, cl..wit.hin the Ii.mits 9f the Dstfict's ~OI:~'~ETIt ~.~E~J..~,P~ff'rl~ uramage man mr which arainage roes nave been adopted; applicable tees should be paid by ceshier's check or money order only to tlie Flood Control Distdct prior to issuance of §uilding or grading permits, whichever comes first. Fees to be paid should be at the rate in effect at the time of issuance of[he actual permit. GENERAL INFORMATION This project may require a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Con[roi Board. Clearance for grading, recordation, or other final approvaIshould not be given until the City has determined that the project has been granted a permit or is shown to be exempt. If this project involves a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)mapped flood plain, then the City should require the applicant to provde all studies, calculations, plans and other Information re_quired to meet FEMA reguirements, and should further require that the applicant obtain a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) pdor to grading, recordation or other final approval of the project, and a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) pdor to occupancy. If a natural Watercourse or mapped flood plain is impacted by this project, the City should require the applicant to obtain a Section 1601/1603 Agreement from the California Department of Fish and Game and a Clean Water Act Section 404 Permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, or wdtten correspondence from these agencies indicating the project is exempt from these reqmrements. A Clean Water Act Section 401 Water Quality Cert~cation may be required from the local Ca fornia Regional Water Quality Control Board pdor to issuance of the Corps 404 permit. ~)e~TRl~e.~ ~ ~ /,JO~,,~. J.,,Jl'rH~ "/'H~ Very truly yours, F P~C.. 1'1,~1 l'J £3 · STUART E. MCKIBBIN k.l~ . Senior Civil Engineer c: Date: Z' February 22, 2001 City of Temecula Plmming Department P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 ATTN: Patty Anders, Associate Planner RE: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 30088: CITY PdVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFOPqNIA. (1 LOTS) OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF Dear Gentlemen: 1. The Department of Environmental Health has reviewed Tentative Tract Map No. 30088 and recommends: A water system shall be installed according to plans and specifications as approved by the water company and the Environmental Health Department. Permanent prints of the plans of the water system shall be submitted in triplicate, with a minimum scale not less than one-inch equal's 200 feet, along with the original drawing to the City of Temecula. The prints shall show the internal pipe diameter, location of valves and fire hydrants; pipe and joint specifications, and the size of the main at the junction of the new system to the existing system. The plans shall comply in all respects with Div. 5, Part 1, and Chapter 7 of the California Health and Safety Code, California Administrative Code, Title 11, Chapter 16, and General Order No. 103 of the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California, when applicable. The plans shall be signed by a registered engineer and water company with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system in Tentative Tract Map No. 30088 is in accordance with the water system expansion plans of the Rancho California Water District and that the water services, storage, and distribution system will be adequate to provide water service to such Tract Map". This certification does not constitute a guarantee that it will supply water to such Tract Map at any specific quantities, flows or pressures for fire protection or any other purpose. This certification shall be signed by a responsible official of the water company. The plans must be submitted to the City of Temecula's Office to review at least TWO WEEKS PRIOR to the request for the recordation of the final map. This subdivision has a statement from Rancho California Water District agreeing to serve domestic water to each and every lot in the subdivision on demand providing satisfactory financial arrangements are completed with the subdivider. It will be necessary for financial arrangements to be made PRIOR to the recordation of the final map. Local Enforcement Agency * RO. Box 1280, Riverside, CA 92502-1280 * (909) 955-8982 * FAX {909) 781-965,?, * 4080 Lemon StYeet, 9th Floor, Riverside, CA 92501 Land Use and Water Eng neerlng * PO Box 1206 Rivers'de, CA 92502 I206 * (909) 955 8980 * FAX 909 955 * · ' ' - ( ) -8903 4080LemonSlxeet. 2ndFloor Rivorqldo oAQgr~c~l City of Temecula Planning Page Two Attn: Patty Anders February 22, 2001 This subdivision is within the Eastern Municipal Water District and shall be connected to the sewers of the District. The sewer system shall be installed according to plans and specifications as approved by the District, the City of Temecula and the Environmental Health Department. Permanent prints of the plans of the sewer system shall be submitted in triplicate, along with the original drawing, to the City of Temecula. The prints shall show the internal pipe diameter, location of manholes, complete profiles, pipe and joint specifications and the size of the sewers at the junction of the new system to the existing system. A single plat indicating location of sewer lines and waterlines shall be a portion of the sewage plans and profiles. The plans shall be signed by a registered engineer and the sewer district with the following certification: "i certify that the design of the sewer system in Tentative Tract Map No. 30088 is in accordance with the sewer system expansion plans of the Eastern Municipal Water District and that the waste disposal system is adequate at this time to treat the anticipated wastes from the proposed Tract Map". The plans must be submitted to the City of Temecula's Office to review at least two weeks PRIOR to the request for the recordation of the final map. 5. It will be necessary for financial arrangements to be completely finalized PRIOR to recordation of the final map. 6. It will be necessary for the annexation proceedings to be completely finalized PRIOR to the recordation of the final map. 7. Additional approval from Riverside County Enviroinnental Health Department will be required for all tenants operating a food facility or generating any hazardous waste. Sincerely, SM:dr (909) 955-8980 Health Specialist January25,2001 Patty Anders, Case Planner City of Temecula Planning Department 43200 Business Park Drive Post Office Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 SUBJECT: WATER AVAILABILITY TRACT NO. 30088 HARVESION SPECIFIC PLAN _. PLANNING API'LICATION NO. PA01-0032 Dear Ms. Anders: Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located within the boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD). Water service, therefore, would be available upon completion of financial arrangements between RCWD and the property owner. If fire protection is required, the customer will need to contact RCWD for fees and requirements. Water availability would be contingent upon the property owner signing an Linda M. Ih'egoso Agency Agreement that assigns water management rights, if any, to RCWD. C. Michael Cowet t In our previous correspondence to Debbie Ubnoske dated December 5, 2000, RCWD requested that the developer consider the use of recycled water for the proposed pond to be located in this development m~d for any other appropriate uses. We request that the deve!~per discuss these requirements with RCWD st~tf. If you should have any questions, please contact an Engineering Services Representative at this office. Sincerely, RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT Steve Brannon, P.E. Development Engineering Manager RTA ID:9096841007 HRY 31'01 9:14 No.O01P.02 May 3l, 200l River~ld® Transit Agency 182511'~ird Street P.O. BOX 59968 Riverside, CA 92517 Phone;(909) 684-0850 Fa~ (909) City of Temccula Planning Departmem I met recently with Matt Fagan to discuss the Narveston Specific Plan. It appears that ali attempts have been made to design tile project in a transit~friendly rammer, including the open-ended clustering ofresidentlal unit.~. The mixed-uses in the Village Green Center · axe also conducive to transit usage.. We hope to jointly design a pilot program to encourage transit uaagc and thc usc of other alternatives to the single occupaneyvehicle, it Wouldbe beneficial for the community to provide trausit agcess tn adjacent areas, such as thc Promenade Mall, middle and high schools and local employment centers. Please continue to keep us posted so we can maximize coordination of planning efforts. you for the opportunity to comment on this project. ATFACHMENT NO 10 DRAFT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND LENNAR COMMUNTIES R:\S P~Harveston SP~City CounciI~STAFFRPT 7-24-01.doc 20 The Draft Development Agreement will be distributed under separate cover. ATTACHMENT NO 11 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT- JUNE 20, 2001 R:\S PXHarveston SP~City CounciI~STAFFRPT 7-24-01.doc 21 STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION June 20, 2001 Planning Application Planning Application Planning Application Planning Application Planning Application Planning Application Planning Application Planning Application Planning Application Planning Application Planning Application No. 00-0419 No. 99-0418 No. 99-0418 No. 99-0418 No. 00-0189 No. 99-0248 No. 99-0446 No. 00-0295 No. 01-0030 No. 01-0031 No. 01-0032 - General Plan Amendment for Harveston - Harveston Specific Plan No. 13 - Development Code Amendment - Specific Plan Zoning Standards - Harveston Environmental Impact Report - Change of Zone - Development Agreement - Tentative Tract Map No. 29639 - Tentative Tract Map No. 29928 - Tentative Tract Map No. 29929 - Tentative Tract Map No. 30088 Prepared By: Patty Anders, Associate Planner RECOMMENDATION: The Community Development Department - Planning Division Staff recommends the Planning Commission: 1. ADOPT a Resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2001- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING CERTIFICATION OF THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT PREPARED FOR THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN AND RELATED ACTIONS AND RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS, AND A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM IN CONNECTION THEREWITH FOR THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED EAST OF INTERSTATE 15, NORTH OF SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK, WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD AND SOUTH OF THE NORTHERN CITY LIMIT (PLANNING APPLICATION 00-0189). R:\S P\Harveston SP\PC Docs\ PC STAFFRPT.doc 1 2. ADOPT a Resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2001- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE THE FOLLOWING: 1) GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT FOR THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 00-0419); 2) THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 13 (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 99-0418); 3) ADOPT AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING STANDARDS (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 99- 0418); 4) ADOPT AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING A CHANGE OF ZONE TO AMEND THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY (PLANNING APPLICATION 99-0245); AND 5) ADOPT AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING A CODE AMENDMENT TO SECTION 17.16.070 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 99-0418); 6) ADOPT AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE HARVESTON DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE SERVICE COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL PORTIONS OF THE SPECIFIC PLAN (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 00-0446); ON PARCELS TOTALING APPROXIMATELY 550 ACRES LOCATED EAST OF INTERSTATE 15, NORTH OF SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK, WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD AND SOUTH OF THE NORTHERN CITY LIMIT, AND FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NOS. 910- 261-001,910-261-002, 910-110-013, 910-110-015, 910-110-020, 910-110- 021,910-110-027, 910-110-076, 910-100-007, 910-100-008, 910-060-009, 910-120-005, 910-t 20-007, 910-120-008, 911-630-001, 911-630-002, 911 - 630-003, 911-640-001, 911-640-002, 911-180-002, 911-180-003, 911-180- 004, 911-180-008, 911-180-009, 911-180-015, 911-180-023, AND 911-180- 028. ADOPT a Resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2001- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 00-0295 - TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 29639, THE SUBDIVISION OF APPROXIMATELY 550 ACRES INTO 91 LOTS WHICH CONFORM TO THE PLANNING AREAS, OPEN SPACE AREAS, SCHOOL AND PARK SITES OF THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN; PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 01-0030 - TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 29928, THE SUBDIVISION OF APPROXIMATELY 40 ACRES INTO 140 RESIDENTIAL LOTS AND 21 OPEN SPACE LOTS IN PLANNING AREA 7 OF THE HARVESTON R:\S P'J-larveston SP\PC Docs\ PC STAFFRPT.doc 2 SPECIFIC PLAN; PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 01-0031 -TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 29929, THE SUBDIVISION OF APPROXIMATELY 20 ACRES INTO 118 RESIDENTIAL LOTS AND 3 OPEN SPACE LOTS IN A PORTION OF PLANNING AREAS 3 AND 4 OF THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN; AND PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 01-0032 - TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 30088, THE SUBDIVISION OF APPROXIMATELY 9.18 ACRES INTO 38 RESIDENTIAL LOTS AND 8 OPEN SPACE LOTS IN A PORTION OF PLANNING AREA 4 OF THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN LOCATED EAST OF INTERSTATE 15, NORTH OF SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK, WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD AND SOUTH OF THE CITY LIMIT, AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NOS. 910-261, -001,910-261-002, 910-110-0'13, 910-110-015, 910-110-020, 910-110-021,910-110-027, 910-110-076, 910-100-007, 910- 100-008, 910-060-009, 910-120-008, 911-630-001, 911-630-002, 911-630- 003, 911-640-001, 911-640-002, 911-180-002, 911-180-003, 911-180-004, 911-180-008, 911-180-009, 911-180-015, 911-180-023 AND 911-180-028. APPLICATION INFORMATION APPLICANT: Lennar Communities REPRESENTATIVES: Bill Storm, Lennar Communities Jayna Morgan, EDAW Matthew Fagan, Fagan Consulting Bill Green, RBF Consulting PROPOSAL: A Specific Plan consisting of approximately 550 acres proposing 1,921 residential units with a variety of residential product types and lot sizes; a 12 acre elementary school site; a 7 acre lake with a 6.9 acre lake park; a 16.5 acre community park; a 13.8 acre arroyo open space park; a Mixed-Use Overlay zone (Village Green); and 112.5 acres of Service Commercial land adjacent to Interstate 15. A Development Code Amendment to amend Section 17.16.070 of the City of Temecula Development Code and adopt the Specific Plan Zoning Standards for residential and commercial development contained in Chapter 11, Development Standards, of the Harveston Specific Plan. A General Plan Amendment for the reallocation of the existing land uses within the Specific Plan, for the two excluded parcels that are not owned by Lennar and the approximately 1.3 acre parcel north and west of Ynez Road and Equity Drive. The Land Use designation for the excluded parcels will be changed from NC (Neighborhood Commercial) to LM (Low Medium Density Residential). The Land Use Designation of the triangular piece will be changed from Service Commercial (SC) to Business Park (BP). R:\S P\Harveston SP\PC Docs\ PC STAFFRPT.doc 3 A change of zone for the 1.3-acre parcel located north and west of Ynez Road and Equity Drive to remove this parcel from the existing SP (Specific Plan) zoning classification, as it is not part of the proposed Specific Plan. The zoning will be changed to LI (Light Industrial) and will be consistent with the General Plan Land Use Designation of Business Park (BP). A City initiated change of zone for the two excluded parcels is also required. The two parcels are currently zoned SP and will be changed to LM (Low Medium Density Residential) to provide appropriate development potential. LOCATION: East of Interstate 15, north of Santa Gertrudis Creek, west of Margarita Road and south of the northern City limit. EXISTING ZONING: SP (Specific Plan) SURROUNDING ZONING: North: Residential/Business Park South: Community Commercial and Public Institutional East: Low Medium and Medium Residential West: Service Commercial and City of Murrieta MU-2 (Industrial) PROPOSED ZONING: SP (Specific Plan) No. 13, Harveston, LM (Low Medium) density for the two excluded parcels not owned by Lennar, and LI (Light Industrial) for the approximately 1.3 acre parcel being removed from the Specific Plan zoning classification. EXISTING GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATIONS: LM (Low Medium Density), M (Medium Density), H (High Density), NC (Neighborhood Commercial), SC (Service Commercial), OS (Open Space) and P (Public/Institutional) PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATIONS: LM (Low Medium Density), M (Medium Density), H (High Density), SC (Service Commercial), OS (Open Space) and P (Public/Institutional) EXISTING LAND USE: Vacant SURROUNDING LAND USES: North: South: East: West: ResidentialNacant Land Business Park/Retail/Commercial Chaparral High School, Winchester Creek Park and Existing Residential Interstate 15, Business and Industrial Parks, Vacant Land R:\S P\Harveston SP~PC Docs\ PC STAFFRPT,doc 4 BACKGROUND Staff has been working with the applicant and his team of consultants for approximately one and one half years on the proposed Specific Plan, General Plan Amendment and Environmental Impact Report. Per the Commissioner's request, staff held three Commission workshops to discuss the Commissioners' primary areas of concern: Open SpaceNillage Green, Design Guidelines/Architecture and Traffic Impacts/ Mitigation Measures. In addition, two community workshops were held at the Chaparral High School: one in the evening on January 24, 2001 and one Saturday morning workshop on January 27, 2001. Both workshops had limited attendance with six people at the evening workshop and two people at the Saturday morning workshop. Staff has had several meetings throughout the process with Channell Commercial. Channell is located in the existing business park immediately south of the subject site. Channell's primary issues are safety impacts relative to traffic, rezoning of the Neighborhood Commercial land to residential, park access off of Equity Drive and losing frontage on Ynez Road with the proposed re- alignment and extension of Ynez Road. The applicant has tried to address their concerns as much as feasible, while still complying with the City's direction relative to park, land use and circulation needs of the overall community. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Harveston Specific Plan proposes a maximum of 1,921 dwelling units (1,621 single family and 300 multi-family rental units). The project will consist of 150.9 acres of Iow medium density residential (3-5 du/ac), 79.1 acres of medium 1 density residential (5-7 du/ac), 60 acres of medium 2 density residential (7-13 du/ac), and 16.8 acres of high density residential (13-20 du/ac). Other components of the project include 112.4 acres of service commercial (gross site acre excluding Date Street and Ynez Road), a 16.1 acre community park, a 13.8 acre arroyo park, a 17.3 acre lake/lake park facility, three mini-parks (a minimum of 1.5 acres total for the three parks), a 2.5 acre paseo trail, a 1.8 acre Village Green, trails, paseos, bike lanes, and a 12 acre elementary school site within approximately 550 acres. The Specific Plan also allows for an approximately 13 acre mixed-use overlay district. The 13 acre mixed-use district is intended to function as the "Village Center" for the Specific Plan. The development concept for this area allows for a mix of the following uses: retail, restaurant, office, daycare, worship, and a private club house (Village Green). Additional uses such as recreation, education, and residential (including multi-family) will be provided adjacent to or within the Village Center. A maximum of 20,000 square feet of commercial/retail, which may include residential, recreation, educational and office uses are permitted in this zone along with a 2.0-acre Village Club. The residential uses that may occur within the mixed-use district would not be in addition to nor would they exceed the maximum 1,921 dwelling units. The "Village Center" uses are intended for retail and service uses of a community nature that will attract people from the immediate neighborhoods. The proposed project also includes an overall phasing map and three tentative tract maps for the first phase of development. To implement the project, a Change of Zone and General Plan amendment are required for the two excluded parcels and the approximately 1.3 acre parcel north and west of Ynez Road and Equity Drive. The zoning and land use designation of the two excluded parcels is proposed to change from Neighborhood Commercial (NC) to Low Medium Density Residential (LM). The approximately1.3 acre triangular parcel is proposed to change from a zoning classification of Specific Plan (SP) to Business Park (BP), and the land use designation is being R:\S P\Harveston SP\PC Docs\ PC STAFFRPT.doc 5 changed from Service Commercial (SC) to Light Industrial (LI). The overall existing General Plan Land Use Designations will be reallocated within the project area. A Development Code Amendment to amend Section 17.16.070 of the City of Temecula Development Code to add the Harveston Specific Plan is also required. Due to the uncertainty of the Ynez Road alignment, the triangular piece may vary in size and result in a parcel with a very irregular shape, limited access and difficult to develop. The applicant has tentatively agreed to sell this unusual piece of land to the adjacent industrial user, Channell Commercial. As part of the negotiations with Channel Commercial, staff has agreed that due to the unusual circumstances, irregular shape and uncertainty of this parcel, a variance to the development standards will likely be required and supported by staff. ANALYSIS LAND USE The Specific Plan has twelve Planning Areas and eight different land use classifications. The land use classifications are as follows: LM (Low-Medium, Density 3-5 du/ac), M1 (Medium-I, Density 5-7 du/acre), M2 (Medium-2, Density 7-13 du/ac), H (High Density, 13-20 du/ac), Mixed-Use Overlay Zone, Park, School and Service Commercial. Shown below are the density ranges, target densities, and the number of dwelling units proposed for each Planning Area: DETAILED LAND USE SUMMARY TARGET PLANNING DENSITY TARGET DWELLING DESIGNATION AREA ACREAGE RANGE DENSITY UNITS RESIDENTIAL Low Medium 1 41.1 3-5 4.0 164 4 24.5 3-5 3.4 83 7 39.1 3-5 3.6 140 10 46.2 3-5 4.1 191 SUBTOTAL 150.9 -- 3.8 578 Medium 1 2 40.1 5-7 6.0 241 8 39.0 5-7 6.0 234 Subtotal 79.1 -- 6.0 475 ' Medium 2 3 35.9 7-13 9.2 330 5 7.5 7-13 10.0 75 9 8.6 7-13 9.6 83 11 8.0 7-13 10.0 80 Subtotal 60.0 -- 9.7 568 High 6 16.8 13-20 17.8 300 Subtotal '16.8 -- 17.8 300 RESIDENTIAL TOTAL 306.8 -- 6.3 '1,921 R:\S P\Harveston SP\PC Docs\ PC STAFFRPT.doc 6 NON-RESIDENTIAL Community Park 1 16.5 ...... Vlini Parks 1 / 7 / 10 1.5 ...... Paseo Park 2 / 3 2.0 ...... Lake Park Facility 3 17.3 ...... Mixed-Use Overlay 3 / 4 / 6 ...... Elementary School 4 12.0 ...... Village Green 3 1.8 ...... Arroyo Park 9 13.8 ...... Service Commercial 12 112.5 0.3 - 1.5 .... Major Streets -- 60.2 ...... Triangle Site -- 1.3 ...... Out Parcels 3.8 ...... NON-RESIDENTIAL TOTAL 242.7 PROJECT TOTAL 549.5 3.5 I 1 ~921 NOTE: The Density Range for the Service Commercial is actually the Floor Area Ratio. COMMUNITY DESIGN At the center or "heart" of the development is the 17.3 acre lake and take park. The general public will have access to fishing, walking and jogging activities around the lake. However, only the residents of Harveston will have access to the boating facilities and the private Village Club. The lake park contains a 10 foot multi-purpose trail that will allow walking, jogging, picnicking, etc. In addition to the take park, the Specific Plan provides an extensive trail system adjacent to the collector and arterial roadways. There is also a paseo trail that connects the lake park to the Community Park. The 13.8 acre arroyo park ts an environmental mitigation area that will re-create a riparian environment and will be fenced. It will provide a unique opportunity for walking, hiking and picnicking near the arroyo, but not within the mitigation area due to its environmental sensitivity. The Specific Plan is proposing an expanded parkway greenbelt system, or Landscape Development Zones (LDZ) adjacent to collector and higher volume roadways. The LDZ will be landscaped with turf, trees, and various additional plant materials and will vary in width. The sidewalk on the outside of the Loop Road and on Date Street adjacent to the arroyo will meander. Sidewalks that are parallel to the street will be provided in the greenbelt on both sides of the street throughout the development. The Mixed-Use Overlay zone or Village Green is a unique space that allows flexibility for a variety of uses up to a maximum of 20,000 square feet of commercial/retail uses and a maximum of 15,000 square feet for a Village Club, residential, recreation and educational uses. This area is intended to be a neighborhood "village" with opportunities for live/work situations, outdoor cafes, neighborhood retail, restaurant, office, daycare, worship, and a private clubhouse (Village Club). Additional uses such as recreation, education, and multi-family will be provided adjacent to or within the Village Center. There are specific development standards to ensure a pedestrian °riented, neighb°rh°°d village within this area through site planning, architecture, landscaping and signage requirements (see Section 11 Development Standards and Figure 11.14). The Village Green is a turf amphitheatre that is located at the major entry off of Margarita Road at the southern end of the Lake. The Village Club is a private area for Harveston residents which may provide a swimming pool, a fitness center and private community facilities. R:\S P~Harveston SP\PC Docs\ PC STAFFRPT.doc 7 In an effort to create a less "auto-dependent" development, a transit plan has been developed with input provided from Riverside Transit Agency (RTA). The Village Center, high density residential and the M2 (medium density) are located at the "core" of the project to provide the critical, necessary density needed to support public transit. Moreover, the comprehensive sidewalk/trails system provided within the project provides excellent pedestrian access to the potential transit stops. To ensure a high level of architectural quality, staff has required the applicant to provide extensive, detailed architecture and site planning standards (see Sections 10 Design Guidelines and Section 11 Development Standards). These standards encourage architectural forward site planning by allowing reduced front and rear yard setbacks for homes that meet the definition of architecture forward. In general, the architecture forward is defined as advancing the architecture of the living space forward on the lot, while concurrently, the garage is held in place, or in some instances, the garage may be further recessed (see Section 10.0 Design Guidelines for an expanded definition). This allows the home to be the predominant architectural element of the home, not the garage. Moreover, the Director of Planning may administratively approve modifications to the development standards up to 15% for innovative, quality architecture and site planning. This option is similar to the Development Code's Minor Exception permit. Another feature of the plan is that the individual neighborhoods have been designed with landscape treatments such as open ended cul-de-sacs and extensive open space lots in addition to the required Landscape Development Zone. The individual communities will have landscaped arbors or trellis that are architecturally compatible with the residenecs within the development. The Specific Plan also requires unique light poles and mail boxes in the neighborhoods (not arterial roadways) that compliment the individual community architecture. RESIDENTIAL AREAS The applicant is proposing a variety of product types that will fit on a range of different lot sizes. The lot sizes of the residential Planning Areas are as follows: Planninq Areas 1, 4, 7 and 10 (Low Medium Density 3-5 du/ac): These Planning Areas will have the largest lots and are located predominantly on the outside of the Loop Road and above the arroyo park. A small portion of PA 4 is located within the Loop Road, adjacent to the school. The minimum lot size for these Planning Areas is 4,000 square feet with an average lot size of 5,000 square feet. The Planning Areas are intended to have standard detached single family homes, although there is a provision for attached and clustered products. Planning Areas 2, and 8 (Medium-1 Density 5-7 du/ac): These Planning Areas are to the west of the lake/lake park and located between the Community Park and south of Date Street. The minimum lot size is 3,000 square feet with an average lot size of 3,500 square feet. These Planning Areas are intended to have detached single family homes, as well as attached or clustered product types. Planninq Areas 3, 5, 9 and 11 (Medium-2 Density 7-13 du/ac): These Planning Areas are to the north and south of the lake/lake park, adjacent to the High Density and north of Date Street. The minimum lot size is 2,000 square feet with an average lot size of 2,500 square feet. These Planning Areas are intended to be more dense, detached single family homes on narrower lots, as well as condominium or clustered product types. R:\S P\Harveston SP\PC Docs\ PC STAFFRPT,doc 8 Planninq Area 6 (Hiqh Density '/3-20 du/ac): This Planning Area is intended to have multi-family product types such as apartments. It is strategically located at the Village Center to be close to the neighborhood commercial and lake facilities. This density is crucial in that it is in walking distances to the future bus services and future commercial/retail businesses that are anticipated in the Village Center. TENTATIVE TRACT MAPS Planning Application No. 00-0295 (Tentative Tract Map No. 29639) is a financing map for the subdivision of approximately 550 acres into 91 lots which conform to the various Planning Areas, Open Space areas, school and park sites of the Harveston Specific Plan. Because the actual alignment of the future interchange is unknown at this time and will not be resolved quickly, the City is requiring the amount of land reasonably foresees as accommodating the required right-of-way to be dedicated for the future interchange at Cherry Street at Interstate 15. Staff is also proposing that no maps be recorded and no development plans be approved in the western half of the project until the Cherry Street alignment is finalized and the future alignment of Ynez Road has been determined. Planning Application No. 01-0030 (Tentative Tract Map No. 29928) proposes the subdivision of approximately 40 acres into 140 residential lots and 21 open space lots in Planning Area 7. The zoning for Planning Area 7 is Low Medium which requires a minimum lot size of 4,000 square feet and an average lot size of 5,000 square feet. Residential lots in Tentative Tract Map No. 29928 range in size from a minimum of 6,000 square feet to a maximum of 14, 547 square feet with an average tot size of 8, 278 square feet. As proposed, this map far exceeds the minimum lot size, width and depth requirements for the LM zoning district. Planning Application No. 01-0031 (Tentative Tract Map No. 29929) proposes the subdivision of approximately 20 acres into 118 residential lots and three open space lots in a portion of Planning Areas 3 and 4. The zoning for Planning Area 3 is Medium 2 and requires a minimum lot size of 2,000 square feet and an average lot size of 2,500 square feet. The proposed residential lots in PA 3 range in size from a minimum of 2,715 square feet to a maximum of 4,529 square feet with an average of 3158 square feet. A portion of the map is within Planning Area 4 which is Low Medium Density. The minimum lot size for Planning Area 4 is 4,000 square feet with an average lot size of 5,000 square feet. The proposed residential lots in PA 4 range in size from a minimum of 4,675 square feet to a maximum of 9,621 square feet with an average of 5,937 square feet. Accordingly, all proposed lots exceed the minimum lot size requirements and each Planning Area provides a variety of lot sizes to help create unique neighborhoods within the same Planning Areas. Planning Application No. 01-0032 (Tentative Tract Map No. 30088) proposes the subdivision of approximately 9.18 acres into 38 residential lots and eight open space lots in a portion of Planning Area 4. The zoning of Planning Area 4 is Low Medium and requires a minimum lot size of 4,000 square feet and an average of 5,000 square feet. The residential lots in Tentative Tract Map 30088 range in size from a minimum of 5,440 square feet to a maximum of 10, 326 square feet with an average of 6,649 square feet. R:\S P~Harveston SP\PC Docs\ PC STAFFRPT.doc 9 All three tentative tract maps, not including the financing map described above, are providing a variety of lot sizes, site layout, open ended cul-de-sacs and additional open space lots. Maps 29928 and 29929 have been designed with open space lots at the main entries to break up the streetscape and create an area for neighbors to gather. All three maps provide open space lots at the end of the cul-de-sac which will provide pedestrian access to and through the neighborhoods. As proposed, the site layout will allow a variety of plotting to create a varied and interesting streetscape. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT A General Plan Amendment is being proposed to allow for the reallocation of the existing land uses within the project area, the two excluded parcels that are not owned by Lennar and the approximately 1.3 acre triangular parcel north and west of Ynez Road. If approved, the General Plan Amendment would change the General Plan Land Use Map in this area to reflect the land uses in the approved Specific Plan. The land use densities for the current General Plan Land Use Designations range from 1,329 to 2,475 dwelling units (d.u.) with a mid-range density of 1,902 d.u. The Land Use Designation range for the Harveston Specific Plan varies from 1,332 d.u. and 2,440 d.u. with a mid-range density of 1,921 d.u. For reference, the previous draft Specific Plan (Winchester Hills) for this property was not approved, but proposed to construct a total of 1,948 units. A copy of this analysis is contained in Attachment No. 7~ The analysis of the density ranges illustrates that the proposed density of the Harveston Specific Plan is within the mid range density classification and does propose an overall project density of 3.4 dwelling units/acre. This is consistent with the overall project densities for many of the approved specific plans within the City. The two out parcels are not part of the Specific Plan, and therefore, are not included in the density calculation. Staff has met with both property owners and their respective representatives to review the proposed Specific Plan and General Plan Land Use amendment. The owner of the 2.5 acre parcel is opposed to the property's Land Use Designation being changed from Neighborhood Commercial to Low Medium P, esidential. The owner of the 1.25 acre parcel would prefer their parcel not be changed from Neighborhood Commercial to Low Medium Residential; however, as an alternative, they would not be opposed to the zoning classification of Medium I as proposed within the Specific Plan. They were initially concerned that their parcel would be designated as open space and become part of the Community Park (see correspondence, Attachment No. 6) but feel comfortable that will not occur. In proposing to change the land use and zoning designations of the two excluded parcels, staff was concerned that leaving these parcels Neighborhood Commercial would create the potential for a significant land use conflict. It is the staffs position that the two excluded parcels' land use designations must be changed to ensure that future development of these two parcels will be compatible with the land uses proposed in the Harveston Specific Plan and to facilitate future development of these two parcels by removing the requirement for a separate Specific Plan. Without this change, the owners of the parcels would be required to prepare and receive approval of a specific plan to do any development on these properties. R:\S p\Harveston SP\PC Docs\ PC STAFFRPT.doc 10 As a result, Staff is recommending that the land use designation of the two excluded parcels be changed from NC (Neighborhood Commercial) to LM (Low Medium Density Residential). Lennar is also requesting that the triangular remnant parcel (approximately 1.3 acres in size) be re-zoned to BP (Business Park). GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING CONSISTENCY The Harveston Specific Plan development concept is consistent with all applicable goals and programs contained within the General Plan and effectively implements the policies of the General Plan and the applicable zoning requirement. The issues and goals identified within each element of the General Plan have been evaluated, and a statement of compliance with the General Plan has been included as Appendix A of the Specific Plan. Staff has also compared the project with the Growth Management Program Action Plan (GMAP) The project supports the goals, policies, and other provisions contained in the GMAP relative to housing needs, alternative modes of transportation, employment opportunities, open space and recreational needs, etc. With the approval of the General Plan Land Use Map Amendment, the Harveston Specific Plan will be consistent with the Land Use Element of the General Plan. Finally, the General Plan Circulation Element Map contains the provision for a roadway, heading east from the intersection with Margarita Road and Date Street, crossing Interstate 15, and intersecting with Jefferson Avenue. Current discussions with Caltrans have indicated that the best location for this connection is south of the current Cherry Street alignment. The City and Developer are currently working with Caltrans to receive approval of a Project Study Report (PSR) that would determine the exact location, size and configuration of this future interchange. The City has historically viewed road locations in undeveloped areas as conceptual until the final locative details can be determined. The proposed roadway location, labeled the Cherry Street alignment is consistent with both the conceptual location contained in the City of Temecula's General Plan as well as the more precise location depicted in the City of Murrieta's General Plan. The current Circulation Element network map for the City of Murrieta shows a location similar to the Cherry Street Alignment shown in the Specific Plan and EIR. For these reasons, staff believes that the alignment is consistent with the General Plans for both the Cities of Murrieta and Temecula. Staff is recommending that the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council approve the Cherry Street alignment in certifying the EIR and approving the Specific Plan. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT Staff has been working with the Applicant on the Development Agreement (D.A.) to resolve the outstanding financing issues and timing of improvements. A complete copy of the D.A. is attached for your review in Exhibit D of Attachment No. 2. CORRESPONDENCE There are two out parcels located within the Specific Plan that are not owned by Lennar. Staff has contacted both property owners and had meetings with both of them. Staff met with Mrs. Blake who is the owner of the 2.5 acre parcel on October 31, 2000, and with Mr. Bob Stockmar and Mr. Bill Stockmar, the owners of the 1.25 acre parcel, on November 8, 2000. Mrs. Blake is not in support of her parcel being changed from neighborhood commercial to residential. A letter dated December R:~S P\Harveston SP\PC Docs\ PC STAFFRPT.doc 11 19, 2000, (see Attachment No. 6) was received from the Stockmar's indicating they preferred their parcel not be changed from neighborhood commercial to Iow medium density residential. However, the Stockmar's did indicate that, as an alternative, they would not be opposed to a Medium 1 zoning classification. Another letter was received from Michelle Bedard dated May 30, 2001, requesting, primarily, the multi-family component of the plan be relocated from Margarita Road and placed adjacent to Ynez Road and the proposed Community Park (see Attachment 6). A letter dated May 11, 2001 from Gresham, Savage, Nolan and Tilden, LLP, the legal counsel retained by the Channell Family Trust and Channell Commercial, was submitted to staff challenging the adequacy of portions of the EIR prepared for the project. The letter challenged the land use compatibility, traffic analysis and noise components of the EIR. Staff and the environmental consultant responded to the challenges of the EIR. Both letters are contained in this staff report under Attachment 6-a). Staff feels the EIR was analyzed and prepared in compliance with the requirements and regulations of the California Environmental Quality Act. Staff also received three phone calls through the process from residents expressing concern over the proposed multi-family component of the project. The concern was proximity to their homes in the Winchester Collection and Winchester Creek development. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION A Draft Environmental impact Report was prepared under Staff's direction by EDAW, Inc., and was distributed to responsible agencies, interested groups, organizations, and individuals. The Draft Environmental impact Report (EIR) was made available for public review and comment for a period of forty-five (45) days. The public review and comment period for the Draft EIR established by the State Clearinghouse commenced on November 1, 2000 and expired on December 18, 2000. The City of Temecula received written comments and responded to each comment in the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR). A copy of the City's response to their comments has been provided to the commenting agencies as required by State law. A copy of both the Draft and Final EIR documents have been previously provided to the Commission. The environmental analysis identified one area where impacts were not considered to be significant (land use) and seven areas where potentially significant impacts were identified which could be avoided or mitigated. These seven areas are: aesthetics/light and glare, transportation, noise, geology and soils, hydrology and drainage, biological resources, and public services and utilities. The one impact area that was identified as resulting in an unavoidable, significant impact was air quality, in accordance with Section 15093 of the State CEQA Guidelines, the City Council must adopt a Statement of Overriding Considerations prior to approving the Harveston Specific Plan. The Statement of Overriding Considerations states that any significant adverse project effects are acceptable if expected project benefits outweigh unavoidable adverse environmental impacts. All large projects in Southern California that cause un-mitigatable impacts requiring statements of over- riding consideration. Among the benefits that this project provides the community are: needed General Plan level roadways, including the area for the future interchange with Interstate 15, new varieties of housing types to complement the City's current housing stock, a needed elementary school, and the potential for significant new employment. A copy of the Final Mitigation Monitoring Program is contained in Attachment No. 9. R:\S P\Harveston SP\PC Docs\ PC STAFFRPT.doc 12 Traffic Analysis A Traffic Study report was prepared for the project to determine the traffic impacts at "Project Build- Out". The study assumed that at project build-out Ynez Road would not be extended north to Murrieta Hot Springs Road and the Cherry Interchange at I-15 would not be completed. The City of Murrieta has previously stated that they would not allow Ynez Road to be extended northward until the interchange at Cherry Street was open. As a result, the Traffic Study identified 39 intersections that needed road improvements to mitigate the additional traffic impact caused by the Harveston Specific Plan (see Attachment Nos. 5 and 6). These road improvements are proposed to mitigate the impacts of the project to Level of Service (LOS) D or better. The proposed road improvement mitigation measures are included in the Conditions of Approval of the Specific Plan and Tentative Tract Maps. In addition, the cumulative impact of traffic after project build-out was addressed by staff. The City Circulation Element shows a need for the Cherry Street Interchange at 1-15 at build out. The Harveston Specific Plan land uses would generate at least 10% of the traffic using the future interchange. In order to mitigate this cumulative impact, staff has conditioned the project to dedicate the necessary right-of- way for construction of the Cherry Street Interchange. This will be included in the Conditions of Approval of the Tentative Tract Maps showing subdivisions in that area. With the mitigation measures shown in the Conditions of Approval, the traffic impacts of this project are determined to be less than significant. Timing of the Mitigation Measures is addressed in the various phases of the project. The intent is to require the traffic mitigation improvements prior to the impact of the construction phase. The Development Agreement will require all improvements to impacted intersections to be built prior to the issuance of the first building permit. Community Management Enhancement Plan (CMEP) The CMEP is a proposal to make Harveston a less auto dependent community. The CMEP is proposing a shuttle system that would provide an alternative means of transportation for the residents of Harveston, As proposed, the shuttle system would not only provide transportation options within the Harveston community, but would offer service to other key locations within the City such as the mall, schools, CRC, post office, etc. The CMEP was developed in cooperation with Riverside Transit Agency (RTA) and the developer is proposed to implement the CMEP as part of the project. A copy of the CMEP is included as Exhibit 11 of this report. SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council certify the Environmental Impact Report, approve the Mitigation Monitoring Program, the Harveston Specific Plan, Development Agreement and the four tentative tract maps pursuant to the following findings and subject to the attached conditions of approval. FINDINGS Planning Application No. 00-0t89 - Harveston Environmental Impact Report 1. The Environmental Impact Report was prepared and circulated in conformance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act and Guidelines. R:~S P~Harveston SP\PC Docs\ PC STAFFRPT.doc 13 The Planning Commission reviewed the Draft and Final Reports prior to considering these matters, and listened to all testimony prior to making their decision to recommend certification of the Final Environmental Impact Report to the City Council. Plannin(~ Application No. 0041 - General Plan Amendment 1. The project as proposed and conditioned is compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community. The project has been reviewed by agencies and staff and determined to be in conformance with the City's General Plan, Development Code, Design Guidelines and Growth Management Program Action Plan. These documents set policies and standards that protect the health, safety and welfare of the community. Access and circulation are adequate for emergency vehicles. The two excluded parcels not under the applicant's ownership that are located within the Specific Plan shall hereby be rezoned from SP (Specific Plan overlay district) to LM (Low Medium Density Residential) to be compatible with the surrounding land uses of the Harveston Specific Plan. The General Plan Land use Designation of these two parcels will be changed from NC (Neighborhood Commercial) to LM (Low Medium Density Residential). The City hereby finds it necessary to change the zoning and Land Use Designation of the two excluded parcels to ensure the public health, safety and welfare of the City and to facilitate future development of these two parcels by removing the requirement for the preparation and approval of a separate Specific Plan. 2. The applicant is proposing a General Plan amendment and Change of Zone for the approximately 1.3 acre parcel located north and west of Ynez Road and Equity Drive to remove this parcel from the Specific Plan. The Land Use Designation shall be changed from Service Commercial (SC) to Low Medium Density Residential (LM). The zoning classification will be changed from Specific Plan (SP) to Low Medium Density Residential (LM) to be compatible with the proposed land uses in the Harveston Specific Plan. As proposed and conditioned is compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community. 3. The project is compatible with surrounding land uses. The project proposes similar residential neighborhoods adjacent to existing surrounding neighborhoods, with interface buffers and full roadway improvements. The limited neighborhood commercial development is proposed within a Village Center and is designed to be pedestrian oriented to serve the needs of the Harveston community. The Service Commercial is west of Ynez Road, adjacent to interstate 15 where similar commercial and retail uses currently exist along the Interstate corridor. 4. The proposed project will not have an adverse effect on the community because it remains consistent with the goals and policies of the adopted General Plan. The project does not represent a significant change to the planned land uses for the site. The General Plan Amendment is a relocation and reallocation of existing land use designations that conforms to the design of the Specific Plan. Plannin.q Application No. 99-04'18 - Harveston Specific Plan No. t3 The proposed Specific Plan is consistent with the General Plan, as it is proposed to be amended, and the Development Code. The proposed Specific Plan is consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan and development code. The Specific Plan is a R:\S P\Harveston SP~C Docs\ PC STAFFRPT.doc 14 reallocation and redistribution of the majority of the existing Land Use Designations and serves as an implementation tool for the General Plan. Therefore, as proposed, the Specific Plan is consistent with the General Plan, as it is proposed to be amended, and Development Code. The proposed Specific Plan would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the city. The project has been reviewed by agencies and staff, and is determined to be in conformance with the City's General Plan (as it is proposed to be amended), Development Code, Design Guidelines and Growth Management Program Action Plan. These documents set policies and standards that protect the health, safety and welfare ofthe community. In addition, the Specific Plan is a master planned community with specific design guidelines and standards that ensure compatibility and interface with the surrounding community in terms of density, design and circulation. Therefore, as proposed, conditioned and designed, the Specific Plan is compatible with the hea~th, safety and welfare of the community. The subject property is physically suitable for the requested land use designations and the anticipated land use developments. There are no physical constraints of the site which would preclude or prohibit the requested land use designations or anticipated developments. Moreover, the proposed Specific Plan land uses are consistent with the land uses of the General Plan and will serve as the tool to regulate and implement the goals and policies of the General Plan. The applicant has submitted applications for Tentative Tract Maps which illustrate that the site is physically suitable for the land uses and development proposed in the Specific Plan. The proposed project sha~l ensure development of desirable character which will be compatible with existing and proposed development in the surrounding neighborh°°d- The project proposes similar residential land uses adjacent to the existing surrounding neighborhoods, with extensive landscape buffers and interfaces. The limited neighborhood commercial development is proposed within a Village Center and is designed to be pedestrian oriented to serve the needs of the Harveston community. The proposed Service Commercial land is west of Ynez Road, adjacent to Interstate 15 where similar commercial and retail uses currently exist along the Interstate corridor. The Specific Plan took under consideration the existing developments and surrounding zoning classifications to ensure development that will be complementary and compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. Plannin(~ Aloplication No. 99-0418--Development ARreement An environmental review has been conducted and approved for this Agreement in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act. The City desires to obtain the binding agreement of the Developer and Owner for the development of the Property in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement. The Developer desires to obtain the binding agreement of the City to permit the Developer to develop the Developer's Project on the Developer's Parcels in accordance with the "Applicable Rules" (as hereinafter defined) and this Agreement. The Owner desires to obtain the binding agreement of the City to permit the Owner to develop the Owner's Parcel in accordance with the "Applicable Rules" (as hereinafter defined) and this Agreement. R:\S P\Harveston SP\PC Docs\ PC STAFFRPT.doc 15 Developer and Owner have applied to the City in accordance with applicable procedures for approval of this mutually binding Agreement. The Planning Commission and City Council of the City have given notice of intention to consider the Agreement, have conducted public hearings thereon pursuant to the Government Code, and have found that the provisions of this Agreement are consistent with the Specific Plan and the City's General Plan. This Agreement is consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare needs of the residents of the City and the surrounding region. The City has specifically considered and approved the impact and benefits of the development of the Property in accordance with this Agreement upon the welfare of the region. This Agreement will bind the City to the terms and obligations specified in this Agreement and will limit, to the degree specified in the Agreement and under State law, the future exercise of the City's ability to delay, postpone, preclude or regulate development on the Property, except a provided for herein. In accordance with the Development Agreement Statutes, this Agreement eliminates uncertainty in the planning process and provides for the orderly development of the Properly. Further, this Agreement eliminates uncertainty about the validity of exactions imposed by the City, allows installation of necessary improvements, provides for public services necessary for the region with incidental benefits for the Property, and generally serves the public interest within the City of Temecula and the surrounding region. Plannin.q Application Nos. 00-0295~ 01-0030, 01-0031, 01-0032--Tentative Tract Maps The proposed subdivision and the design or improvements of the subdivision is consistent with the General Plan, the Harveston Specific Plan, Development Code, and other applicable regulations and requirements. The tentative maps do not propose to divide land which is subject to a contract entered into pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965, or the land is subject to a Land Conservation Act contract but the resulting parcels following division of the land will not be too small to sustain their agricultural use. The site is physically suitable for the type and density of development proposed by the tentative map. Access is proposed from five adjacent, existing streets within the Specific Plan. The site is adjacent to already developed and similar residential uses. Public utilities are available at or in close proximity to the site. The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision to the extent feasible. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision, or the design of the alternate easements which are substantially equivalent to those previously acquired by the public will be provided. The map has provided that all proposed and existing public utility easements over landscape areas shall be granted as shown on the map. The subdivision is consistent with the City's parkland dedication requirements. The subdivision's Quimby Park Fee obligations have been met through the execution of the Amendment and Restatement of Development Agreement, recorded on February 18, 1993. R:~S P~--larveston SP~PC Docs\ PC STAFFRPT.doc 16 ATFACHMENT NO 12 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT- JULY 12, 2001 R:~S P~Harveston SP~City CouncihSTAFFRPT 7-244)1.doc 22 STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION Date: July 12, 2001 Planning Application No. 00-0419 - General Plan Amendment for Harveston Planning Application No. 99-0418 - Harveston Specific Plan No. 13 Planning Application No. 99-0418 - Development Code Amendment Planning Application No. 99-0418 - Specific Plan Zoning Standards Planning Application No. 00-0t89 - Harveston Environmental Impact Report Planning Application No. 99-0245 - Change of Zone Planning Application No. 99-0446 - Development Agreement Planning Application No. 00-0295 - Tentative Tract Map No. 29639 Planning Application No. 01-0030 - Tentative Tract Map No. 29928 Planning Application No. 0!-003t - Tentative Tract Map No. 29929 Planning Application No. 01-0032 - Tentative Tract Map No. 30088 Prepared By: Patty Anders, Associate Planner RECOMMENDATION: The Community Development Department - Planning Division Staff recommends that the Planning Commission: BACKGROUND The Planning Commission heard the above referenced applications at the June 20, 2001 public hearing. These items were continued to a special meeting on July 12, 2001 to allow the applicant and the City to resolve a few outstanding issues on the Development Agreement and to provide staff an opportunity to get additional information that the Commission requested. DISCUSSION During the hearing, three nearby residents spoke in favor of the project and one person spoke against the project, After the public hearing, the Commission requested additional information on the following items of the Specific Plan: 1. The General Plan designations and the zoning of the two out-parcels; 2. The rezoning of Planning Areas 9 and 11 from Medium 2 to Low Medium; 3. The surface area of the lake being available to all residents of Temecula, not just Harveston residences; 4. The Mitigation of school impacts; and 5. Architectural standards for the Service Commercial area in the Specific Plan. General Plan and Zonin.q of the Out Parcels: There are two parcels not owned by Lennar within the Specific Plan. The existing zoning for these out-parcels is SP (Specific Plan) and the existing Land Use Designation on the General Plan Land Use Map is Neighborhood Commercial (NC). The current proposal includes a change of zone to remove the specific plan requirement from these sites and make the land use designations compatible with the surrounding specific ptan. R:~S p'~Harveston SP~PC Docs~PC STAFF RPT 7-12-0t.doc 1 The Commission suggested that the 1.3 acre parcel could be zoned Open Space and incorporated into the Community Park. Staff suggested this, but Lennar has been unable to acquire the property. From a practical perspective, the zoning of this site as open space, without the land owners approval might be considered a "taking" under the law. The designation of this site as Low Medium Density Residential will not preclude its ultimate inclusion into the park area if it is acquired by the applicant or the City. The owner of the this parcel submitted a letter (included in Attachment 6 in the June 20, 2001 staff report attached herein) stating they are opposed to their parcel being zoned Open Space but would accept a Zoning and Land Use Designation of residential. The other out-parcel (approximately 2.5 acres) was also proposed to be re-designated to Low Medium Density Residential to be consistent with the surrounding Specific Plan when the Date Street alignment was preferred early on in the process. However, at this time, it appears that Cherry Street will be the most likely location. The property is currently located near a probable location for the ultimate alignment of Ynez Road. As a result, the site could end up to be either west and/or east of Ynez Road. To deal with this uncertainty, staff is recommending, that at this point, the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council that those portions of the property west of Ynez Road be designated as Service Commercial and those portions that are east of Ynez Road be designated as Low Medium Density Residential. The owner of the 2.5 acre parcel has communicated verbally that they would like their parcel to remain Neighborhood Commercial due to the loss of property value if the parcel is rezoned to residential. Planning Areas 9 and 11 The Commission expressed a concern that Planning Areas 9 and 11 should be designated for Low Medium Density residential uses. Planning Area 9 is a relatively isolated portion of the project on Date Street, west of the main project access onto Date Street. The current Specific Plan proposal would allow additional community supporting uses, such as churches and other community enhancing facilities, in addition to the typical Medium Density 2 Residential uses. These variable land uses were proposed because of the limited number of suitable sites for these facilities within the City. For this reason, staff believes that the Medium Density designation is more appropriate for this potential mixture of uses. However, if the Commission feels that the Medium 2 designation is inappropriate for the site, staff would recommend that a Medium 1 density be considered as an alternative. However, the Medium 1 designation is more likely to create potential land use conflictd if any of these community enhancing uses are constructed in this area. Planning Area 11 was originally zoned LM (Low Medium Density residential) but was rezoned to Medium 2 when staff discovered that a medium density housing project, approximately (11 dwelling units/acre was located immediately north in the City of Murrieta. Therefore, to provide an appropriate land use transition, staff felt that the higher densities in this area were appropriate and justified. " Surface Area of the Lake The Commission has requested Lennar to make the surface area of the lake open to all the residents of the City, not just the future residents of the Harveston project. To date, Lennar has been unable to secure insurance that would reduce their liability to an acceptable level without financially burdening the future residents of Harveston. Lennar is continuing to research insurance companies to see if insurance is available with the lake open to ail the citizens of Temecula. R:\S p'~Harveston SP'~PC Docs~C STAFF RPT 7-12-01.doc ; 2 School Mitigation The Commission also inquired if the school impacts had been mitigated to an acceptable level. The Temecula Valley Unified School District (TVUSD) is the agency responsible for determining the mitigation of school impacts. Lennar Communities has entered into a Mitigation Fee Agreement with the Temecula Valley Unified School District (see attachment 2, school fee summary letter). The Agreement, in summary, requires Lennar tO pay an up-front fee and a deferred fee. The upfront fee is approximately $4,600 per single family detached unit and approximately $3,322 per multi-family unit, for a total upfront fee of $8,272,700. The Agreement also requires Lennar to pay additional deferred mitigation fees if state funding for construction of an elementary school, middle school and high school is not secured. To date, elementary and middle school funding has been secured, but funding for the high school has not been secured. As a result, Lennar is still responsible for the high school deferred mitigation fee. If the high school funding is not secured, Lennar has agreed to pay an additional $3,350,500 to mitigate their impacts to the high school. Therefore, with the mitigation agreement requiring Lennar to pay up-front fees at issuance of building permits ($8,272,700), and the requirement of Lennar to pay a deferred high school mitigation fee ($3,350,500), impacts to the local school system have been fully mitigated. Architectural Standards in the Specific Plan The Commission expressed concern about the architectural requirements in Specific Plan referring back to the Development Code. The Commissions desire was to have detailed standards contained within the Specific Plan to ensure quality architecture throughout the service commercial area, especially along the Interstate 15 corridor. Section 10.6 Service Commercial Architectural Guidelines provides detailed language on the siting, orientation; form, scale and massing; appropriate architectural features and details; appropriate extedor materials and colors; appropriate roof forms and materials; permissible walls and fences types and styles; and appropriate accessory structures, street furniture, bus shelters, lighting and mechanical equipment. This Section also requires the areas north and south of Date/Cherry Street to be master planned prior to any land or subdivision to ensure an attractive Service Commercial environment, sympathetic in scale and aesthetic to the entire development. In addition, Item 14 of Section 11.4.6 of the Specific Plan, Building/Structure Design, provides detailed development and sign standards that would require that "all elevations facing the freeway shall include substantially similar architectural treatments that are located on the buildings' front elevation." This language was explicitly added to ensure all rear elevations visible from interstate 15 would be articulated with the same level of detail as the front elevation so that the visual quality along the Interstate corridor would not be compromised. If the Commission is not comfortable with this existing language, additional language,could be added to the Specific Plan under Section 10.6 Service Commercial Architectural Guidelines. Development Aqreement All the primary issues of the Development Agreement (DA) have been resolved and the draft DA is contained herein as Attachment No. 3. Attachments: 1. Staff Report from the June 20, 2001 Planning Commission Hearing - Blue Page 4 2. School Fee Summary Letter- Blue Page 5 3. Development Agreement and Exhibits- Blue Page 6 R:\S p~-Iarveston SP~PC Docs~PC STAFF RPT 7-12-01.doc 3 ATTACHMENT NO 13 MODIFICATIONS TO THE DRAFT PLAN BEING RECOMMENDED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION R:\S PxHarveston SPXCity CounciI\STAFFRPT 7-24-01.doc 23 LIST OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDED CHANGES TO THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN (July 24, 2001) 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. All references to the requirement that the general public be allowed to use the lake throughout the document will be modified to reflect this position. This clarification does not apply to the Lake Park that surrounds the lake. Table 3.1, the first asterisk, clarify that the maximum commercial/retail square footage in the Village Center is 20,000 square feet. The second sentence shall be modified to read as follows: 'q'he development concept for this area allows for a mix of the following uses: retail and restaurant (with a maximum of 20,000 square feet), office, daycare, worship, park, recreation, educational and residential, and a private club house (the" Village Club") with an additional 15,000 square feet." Page 3-10, No. 1, add the following to the end of this section: "No more than 1,921 units are permitted, not including any density bonus for senior housing as allowed pursuant to the City of Temecula General Plan." Page 10-14, Section 10.1.3, Number 1, the fifth bullet, add "6' "before "curb". Page 10-65, Section 10.3.6, add the following to the end of Number 8, "The light fixture heights and locations need to comply with the conceptual designs shown in Figures 7.1 and 7.2." Page 10-67, Section 10.4.1, add the following to the end of this section: "No architectural style shall constitute more than 20% of all of the single family residences constructed within the Harveston Specific Plan." Page 11-3, No. 4, insert the words "both sides of" between "shall be provided along" and '~the Loop Road". Page 11-9, Number 3 under Planning Standards, delete the words "flag pole" and add the following sentence to the end of this section: 'q'he required focal point element shall be submitted to the Planning Commission for approval." Page 11-11, Section 11.3.5, Planning Standards, Number 5, remove the references to the non-existent Figures 10.1-5A. 10.1-B, and 10.1-C. Page 11-30, delete Number 9. * Page 11-35, delete Number 10. * Page 11-39, delete Number 9. * 15. Page 11-42, delete Number 7. * Page 11-63, No. 3, add the following: "c. A minimum of a fifty foot (50') landscaped buffer/setback area shall be provided adjacent to the Interstate 15 right-of-way. No parking or driving sur[aces are allowed in this area." * Page 11-65, Number 7, add the word '~valls" to the end of the third sentence. * R:\S P\Harveston SP~City Council~LIST OF pLANNING COMMISSION CHANGES.doc 16. Page 11-66, Number 14, add the following to the end this item: "No freeway oriented display areas or display windows are allowed in this Planning Area. * 17. Page 11-70, Theatre Marquee, modify the last sentence to read as follows: "The marquee can have a maximum sign areas of forty (40) square feet and a maximum width of ten (10) feet, shall be architecturally compatible with the adjacent structures, and located outside the public right-of-way." * 18. Page 11-72, General Sign Standards, Number 4, add "approval of a" between 'ffirst" and "development~'. * 19. Page 11-74, Number 3 (Tenant Window Identification), delete the words "in white only". * 20. Page 11-76, amend Section 11.5, Exceptions to Development Standards, to replace "by the Director of Planning" with '~vith the approval of the Planning Commission". * 21. Page 11-76, Add a new paragraph to the end of this section that reads as follows: "The Planning Commission may delegate this approval authority to the Director of Planning." * 22. Page 11-76, add a Section 11.6 to read as follows: "11.6 PRODUCT APPROVAL No single family residences (including the models) shall be constructed without the Planning Commission's prior approval of the architecture and elevations. The Planning Commission may delegate this approval authority to the Director of Planning." * NOTE: The suggested changes marked with a" * "will also be made to the Ordinance adopting the Development Standards located in Exhibit A of Attachment No. 3. R:\S pg-larveston SP\City Council~LIST OF pLANNING COMMISSION CHANGES.doc A'I-I'ACHMENT NO 14 PROPOSED LAND USE PLAN FOR THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN R:\S P~Ha~eston SPeCify CounciI\STAFFRPT 7-24-01.doc 24 ATI'ACHMENT NO 15 GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ACREAGE COMPARISONS R:\S PxHarveston SP~City CounciI~STAFFRPT 7-24-01.doc 25 Revised Harveston General Plan Density Calculation Existing General Plan Land Uses Acres Low High Total Units (Low) Total Units (High) LM 246.8 3 740.4 246.8 6 1480.8 M 68.4 7 478.8 68.4 12 820.8 H 17.5 13 227.5. 17.5 20 350 TOTAL 1446.7 2651.6 Winchester Hills Specific Plan Residential Units (Proposed) Mid-po~t 2049.15 1948 LM M H TOTAL Proposed General Plan Land Uses Acres Low High 228 3 228 6 61.4 7 429.8 61.4 12 16.8 13 218.4 16.8 20 1332.2 Total Units (Low) Total Units (High) 684 1368 736.8 33.~6 2440.8 Mid-po~t 1886.5 Harveston Specific Plan Residential Units (Proposed) 1921 A'I-FACHMENT NO 16 CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION R:\S PXHarveston SP~City CounciI\STAFFRPT 7-244}1.doc 26 IINTEX INTEX PROPERTIES CORP. December 19, 2000 Ms. Patty Anders Associate Planner CITY OF TEMECULA 43200 Business Park Drive P. O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-6477 Harveston Specific Plan Area Stockmar Property Dear Ms. Aadcrs: We appreciate the time you spent with us reviewing the proposed General Plan Amendment and specifically, the Harveston Specific Plan proposed by Lennar Communities. The Plan, as currently designed and when implemented, appears to be a substantial enhancement to the City's residential component of the General Plan, and a community in which the City can be pleased upon development. As the Stockmar's indicated in our meeting of November 8, 2000, and you confirmed in your letter of November 13, 2000, they are generally supportive of the proposed GPA and Specific Plan, but are concerned that the land use and zoning of their 1.25 acre Neighborhood Commercial parcel is proposed to be lnodified to Open Space. This change in land use and zoning removes the utility and the potential future value of the parcel from the Stockmar family. The Specific Plan identifies the parcel as an out piece, but surrounds it with park, thereby making the only logical land use park, and in effect, preventing the Stockmar family alternatives in future development. As Bob Stockmar stated, his preference would be not to change the land use or zoning from Neighborhood Commercial. As an alternative or compromise, the Stockmar family would not be opposed to shifting the boundary of Planning Area 8 to include their parcel in the Medium 1, zoning classification of the Specific Plan. Correspondingly, the park area can adjust its size or encroach slightly into Planning Area 1 to compensate for the gain in acreage of Planning Area 8. We feel that this would be fair and just allowing the Stockmar parcel the potential for fimire use, while the proponent of the Harveston SP can easily modify its proposed land uses to the benefit of their vast holdings. Otherwise, should this property's proposed land use and zoning remain as Open Space in the General Plan Amendment, the Stockmar family wishes to go on record as formally opposing any action which would alter the property's current entitlements. Please include this letter in your staff report for all Planning Commission workshops and hearings. Cc: Bob Stockmar Bill Stockmar 4130 SANTA FE AVE. P.O. BOX 1440 LONG BEACH, CA 90801-1440 TEL (310) 549-5400 FAX (310) 513-6905 38857 Knollddge Dr Temeoula, CA 92591 909-698-2438 Fax 909-677-1985 May30, 2001 Ma. Patty Anders City of Temecula Planning Division Business Park Drive Temecula, GA 92592 Dear Ma. Anders, Thank you for tahing the time to dlsouss our concoma with the development project of Hen/eaton Homes. I feel there could be some improvements that I would like to have token under consideration. My neithers have cald 'what's the point?', decisions like these have been made and one person Isn't going to make a difference but I'm willing to take the chance. It saddens me to see our rolling hills becoming a mass of homes and more homes. We have done very little In this community to presen/e our natural landscape that brought many of us here. While change is inevitable I feel that the less impact on those that have been In this Community for a number of years Is a reasonable request to make. Firstly, I obJect to the addition of 300 apartments to be added to the Margarita side of the Han/eston project. It would be better if they were placed adjacent to the newly planned Spo~ts Park than the currenuy planned single family homes in that location. The traffic created by the apartments would be diverted to Ynez Rd having less of an Impact on all of the homeowners In both the new homes as well as current owners. I would think the builder would benefit by ceiling single faro Ily homes away the ball fields but close enough for them to take advantage of the sen/lees offered there. Those renters o f the apartments would have easier access to the Sports Park, the Industrial park for job opportunities and the SlnCle Family home owners slated to that area would have e location ctoser to Main Street Hanreston, the Lake and more Importantlythe School. I am also concomed about the safety of our children crossing the street from the Winchester Creek and Collection fTom Rustic Glen to Ysabel garnett School. The speed of Mar¢arlta Is COITenUy posted at 50 mpr and that is easily exceeded by 10 to 20 mpr at this time, The 300 plus apartment dwellers would add 400 or more cars to Mar¢arita Rd as MAY-S1-2001 06~27 AM P.02 well. 400 cam In the scheme of things may not seem like muoh to you but I am toklng In to consideration the to and from home, the grece;y store run and the many other running around they will make and are entitled to make. I would hope some measures are taken to provide them with the safest ~rues[ng possible to school, the park, the lake and the Main Street Harveston stores. The other safety Issue I am concerned with Is the response time for ambulances, fire department and Police. I would think that would be reduced and wonder If any provisions have been made to add more cafe~ personnel to the area? Lastly, I would like to see more amenities added to the project such as tennis cou~ and public pools. With the enel~ crisis of today and the more public pools that aru available tha less likely people will be Inclined to build a pool of their own. Speaking[of the ener~ crisis, are we I[olnl[ to be an area that Is proactive in tP/Ing to limit additional housing[in · order to play our part In consewln~ ener~3f? Are we ~oln§ to contribute to possible blackouts? What role Is Temenula playlnl[In this? Sincerely, Mlehelle Bedard Penelope Ale~mnderoKelley GRESHAM, SAVAGE, NOLAN & TILDEN, LLP A REG1STERE~ L~MITED [~A B ILITY PARTNERS.~ LAWYERS · FOUNDED 1910 600 N. ARROWHEAD AVENUF~ SUITE 300 May 11, 2001 HAND DELIVERED City of Temecula Attn: Ms. Debbie Ubonoske Director of Planning 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Re~ Comments on the Environmental Impact Report for the Harveston Specific Plan Dear Ms. Ubonoske: MAY 1 1 ~001 !, ~ This law firm has been retained by the Channel Family Trust and Channell Commercial Corporation (collectively "Channell") to assist Channell in the review of the Environmental Impact Report for the Harveston Specific Plan (the "EIR"), including the draft EIR dated November, 2000, the Final EIR dated January, 2001, and the Technical Appendices. As the City is aware, Channell has owned and occupied a manufacturing facility located at 26040 Ynez Road, Temecula, for the past 12 years. When Channell first relocated its operations to Temecula, it sought out an area of the city with good freeway accessibility for its delivery and distribution truck traffic and room for expansion. Channell now employs 300-400 employees, working in three 8-hour shifts, five days a week, although historic operations have required operations for full week periods. Channell's location is just north of the intersection of Winchester Road and Ynez, at the present terminus of Ynez Road. This location is a part of the Winchester Highlands Business Park (the "Business Park"). Channell has been interested in the City's plans regarding the undeveloped acreage to the west and north of the Business Park. In earlier plans, portions of this area were designated for additional industrial park development, which would not likely cause any conflicts with the existing uses in the Business Park. When the City rezoned the area and was considering the Sweetwater Specific Plan, the predecessor to the Harveston Specific 'Plan, Channell stated its concerns to any plan that would bring residential and recreational uses into direct conflict with the Business Park uses. The Harveston Specific Plan appears to present the same likelihood of such conflicts. In reviewing the EIR, it appears that the City, as the CEQA lead agency, has failed to properly analyze potential impacts which will be caused by the development of the Harveston Specific Plan related to traffic and circulation; pedestrian safety and land use conflicts, and noise. Riverside Office · 3403 Tenth Street, Suite 518, Riverside, CA 92501 ,, (909) 684-2171 ,, Facsimile (909) 684-2150 Victorville Office * 14350 Civic Drive, Suite 120, Victorville, CA 92392 · (760) 243-2889 ,, Facsimile (760) 243-0467 GRESHAM, SAVAGE, NOLAN & TILDEN, LLP Ms. DebbielYoonoske City ofTemecula May ll, 2001 Page 2 To assist in this revie.w of the EIR, we retained the services of Raymond V. Hussey, AICP, Project Manager for LSA Associates, with 13 years experience as a transportation planner, to analyze the potential traffic impacts and to review the traffic study prepared for the Harveston Specific Plan. Mr. Hussey's analysis, dated May 10, 2001, is attached hereto and incorporated herein. Mr. Hussey concludes, in essence, that the trip generation for the proposed project has been undemounted by as much as 23% for the PM Peak Hour period. The severe traffic congestion in the Temecula area is well documented, therefore, the City cannot approve the Harveston Specific Plan, or any project, when it is based upon such a flawed traffic analysis. As the CEQA lead agency, the City's duty is to properly assess the environmental impacts of a project, prior to approving a project, in order to determine what feasible alternatives or mitigation measures are available that would substantially lessen any significant effects on the environment. CEQA Guidelines § 15021. As the traffic generation for this project as reflected in the EIR is so seriously undercounted, the City cannot properly assess the available alternatives for mitigation to lessen the impacts to fulfill its CEQA obligations. Approval of the project without further analysis would violate CEQA and be subject to judicial review. Due to the inadequacy of the traffic analysis and the severity of the potential impacts which have not been addressed in the EIR, as discussed below, it is clear that the EIR should be revised to address these additional issues and then recirculated for additional public review and comment pursuant to CEQA Guidelines § 15088. Channell provides herein its comments on the EIR. SURROUNDING LAND USE CONFLICT ISSUES: As stated above, Channell owns and operates the manufacturing facility at 26040 Ynez Road, located south and east of the proposed project, within the Business Park. Figure 2 in the draft EIR depicts the location of the Business Park. Channell owns the three buildings encimled by Ynez Road, Equity Drive and County Center Drive. The EIR appears not to address any potential impacts that the Harveston Plan may have on the Business Park, and appears to ignore the existing Business Park activities and how the proposed project may conflict with those activities. In fact, in the draft EIR, Section 5, the EIR fails to introduce the Business Park as one of the surrounding land uses. The draft EIR states, in part: "Immediately north of the project site, in southwestern Riverside County, is the Warm Springs Specific Plan, a 475-acre project approved for residential, retail, and neighborhood commercial uses. The Campos Verdes Specific Plan area, composed of a shopping center (Lowes), and varying densities of residential uses, is located east of Margarita Road and south of Winchester Road, adjacent to the existing Roripaugh Estates development. Lastly, southeast of the project site, east of Winchester Road, there are GRESHAM, SAVAGE, NOLAN & TILDEN, LLP Ms. DebbieUbonoske City ofTemecula May ll, 2001 Page 3 the Promenade Mall and Palm Plaza (Please refer to Exhibit 2, Local Vicinity/Surrounding Land Uses)." (Emphasis added.) (Draft EIR, p. 5-3, and repeated at p. 5-18.) The draft EIR concludes, with no analysis, that the Community Park located in Planning Area 1 of the Harveston Specific Plan "is intended to act as a buffer between the existing Winchester Highlands Business Park (including Channel Commemial) and proposed residential." While the Community Park may be a "buffer" between the proposed residential uses and the existing industrial park uses, the EIR does not analyze the impacts of placing a community park use directly adjacent to the existing, operating, industrial uses. "Design alternatives" for the Community Park are reviewed in Section 5 of the draft EIR (Page 5-18.) The draft EIR explains that: "[T]he community park in Planning Area 1 and the elementary school in Planning Area 4, both being public facilities, were located at the exterior of the Harveston community in order to be easily visible and accessible for the public outside the Harveston development." (EJnphasis added.) (Draft EIR, p. 5- 18.) Thus, the express intention of the proposed project is to bring additional traffic, unrelated to its own residential development, into this Community Park. Section 6 of the draft EIR states that TCSD requires that there be 100 parking spaces within the Community Park, accessible from Equity Drive; however, these trips are not identified in the EIR. See also, Mr. Hussey's analysis of this issue. The EIR also fails to analyze the potential impacts between conflicting vehicle traffic trying to access the Community Park from Equity Drive, and semi-track traffic accessing the Business Park. An alternative in the draft Eli{ calls for the realignment of Equity Drive to provide "for greater buffer / separation of the proposed park from the existing Winchester Highlands Business Park uses (i.e. Channel Commercial)", but ignores the fact that Equity Drive is used by truck traffic accessing the Channell buildings and for accessing other businesses with the Business Park. Exhibit 50 of the draft EIR does not explain how the realignment of Equity Drive will provide a "buffer" between these uses. Additionally, the Channell facility includes outside storage of finished goods awaiting shipment. This storage is in the lot at the comer of Equity Drive and County Center Drive. This storage area, while completely fenced, will be clearly visible from the proposed Community Park and Equity Drive. The entry to Channell's building is improved with decorative waterscaping, which is presently "used" by unauthorized children and adults, which will certainly be GRESHAM, SAVAGE, NOLAN & TILDEN, LLP Ms. Debbie Ubonoske City of Temecula May I 1, 2001 Page 4 exacerbated by the dev.elopment of a Community Park with soccer and ball fields. The EIR does not analyze how the realignment of Equity Drive will provide a buffer for these types of impacts. TRAFFIC/CIRCULATION AND PEDESTRIAN SAFETY ISSUES: Based upon our review of the EIR and Channell's knowledge of the various uses within the Business Park, it appears that the EIR does not take into account the impact of the proposed project on the existing manufacturing facilities, including potential conflicts with semi-truck traffic going to and leaving from the Business Park, and safety hazards to increased pedestrian traffic. Traffic/Circulation Issues: For Channell's operations alone, semi-truck traffic begins to arrive at and stage for early morning pick-ups at about 3:00 a.m. This usually involves an average of six (6) trucks per day. Other semi-truck traffic arrives at and departs from the Channell facilities at all times of the day, involving an average of twenty (20) tracks per day. Some of the trucks access the Channell facilities using Equity Drive or County Center Drive, however, one of Channell's truck delivery driveways is located on Ynez Road. This delivery site is for steel deliveries, with one trailer of about forty-eight (48) feet in length. These deliveries occur as often as two (2) trucks per day. Currently, these delivery trucks leave the Channell site by turning left onto Ynez Road and then accessing the freeway at Winchester Road. With the proposed development of Ynez Road, and the increased traffic using this parallel to the 1-15 freeway, conflicts with this truck access driveway will result. Also, many of the trucks leaving the Channell facilities and the Business Park generally, exit at County Center Drive, turning left onto Ynez Road to access the freeway at Winchester Road. Potential impacts to the intersection of Ynez Road and County Center Drive are not adequately analyzed in the traffic section of the draft EIR. With increased traffic caused by the development of Ynez Road, conflicts at this intersection will occur as semi-trucks try to negotiate the left-hand turn out of the Business Park. Although the draft EIR analyzes access intersections to the Service Commemial development along Ynez Road within the Specific Plan development, it fails to analyze the impacts to existing access intersections along Ynez in the Business Park, which will be impacted by the increased traffic. If trucks are fomed to turn right on Ynez Road, they will drive directly through the Harveston Specific Plan development. The impacts from this track traffic through the Specific Plan are not addressed in the EIR. Potential impacts include air quality impacts, including a CO (hot spot) analysis from idling diesel engines. These potential traffic and cimulation impacts are not properly analyzed in the EIR. The draft EIR states that one threshold of significance of a transportation/circulation effect is: "c. Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g. sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses." (Draft EIR, p. 5-39). The potential impacts identified GRESHAM, SAVAGE, NOLAN & TILDEN, LLP ."eneiope Alexander-Kelley Ms. Debbie Ubonoske City of Temecula May 11, 2001 Page 5 herein have the poten, tial to surpass this threshold, thereby requiring the City to revise its environmental analysis to identify impacts and provide for feasible mitigation measures to lessen or eliminate the impacts. Pedestrian Safety Issues: There are potential safety hazards to pedestrian traffic from the project resulting from the close proximity of the proposed Community Park use to the Business Park. Since there is no proposal to prohibit street parking for the Community Park, there will be traffic and circulation impacts on Equity Drive. Equity Drive is currently used by semi-trucks, both for travel and for staging for early morning pick-ups. There is no mention in the EIR of potential circulation impacts as both semi-tracks and vehicles attempt to access Equity Drive. Clearly, the Park is designed to accommodate soft ball and soccer games, drawing numerous children at various times of the day. As access to the Community Park is allowed from Equity Drive, pedestrians exiting their vehicles along Equity Drive will encounter semi-truck traffic. By bringing children and adult pedestrians into a well-traveled semi-truck route, the proposed project exposes them to potential dangers which are not identified in the EIR. Since these impacts are not analyzed at all in the EIR, there are no measures to mitigate these potential impacts, as CEQA requires. As such, the EIR is fatally defective and must be revised to address these serious public safety issues. NOISE: The draft EIR contains a description of the ambient noise levels at the site of the proposed development. However, the analysis does not identify noise levels at the site of the proposed community park, which is proposed to be located directly north of the Business Park. The allowable noise level for the Community Park is not identified in the draft EIR, but appears to be up to 65 dB. (Draft EIR, pp. 5-105 to 5-106.) The EIR does not contain an analysis of noise levels at the proposed Community Park site which would be generated by the semi-truck traffic and industrial activities within the Business Park. As these impacts are not identified, there is no feasible mitigation identified in the ErR. Noise Mitigation Measure 4, which provides for future noise studies, impermissibly delays the analysis of potential impacts to recreational user of the Community Park and impermissibly delays the identification of feasible mitigation. The purpose of CEQA is to require a lead agency to make a knowing and informed decision about the potential environmental impacts of a proposed project, prior to approving the project. Because the City does not analyze noise impacts at the Community Park, it cannot now determine whether its own noise standards will be exceeded at this proposed outdoor recreational site. The EIR analysis is fundamentally flawed, and should be revised to account for these potential impacts. Failure to provide an adequate analysis of the project's potential GRESHAM, SAVAGE, NOLAN & TILDEN, LLP Penelope Alexander-Kelley Ms. Debbie Ubonoske City of Temecula May 11, 2001 Page 6 environmental impacts.prior to approving the project is a violation of the City's duties as the CEQA lead agency. Public Resources Code § 21167. In conclusion, we appreciate this opportunity to provide these comments on the FIR for the Harveston Specific Plan. We request that the City's consideration of the Harveston Specific Plan be postponed until the environmental analysis can be revised to provide a legally adequate analysis of all potential impacts. Channell, as a good corporate citizen and neighbor in the City of Temecula, looks forward to reviewing the revised EIR addressing its concerns. If you have any questions of us, please do not hesitate to contact me directly, or Mr. Ed Burke at Channell. Sincerely, eene,o C~/~~ p~lexlander-Kelley of GRESHAM, SAVAGE, NOLAN & TII.DEN, lJ.P PAK/Ir Enclosure cc: Bill Storm, Project Manager, Lennar Communities LSAI LSt. SOCIATE3~ INC. OTHER OFFICES: FT. COLLINS May I0, 2001 GRESHAM, SAVAGE, NOLAN & TILDEN, LLP Penny Alexander-Kelley Gresham, Savage, Nolan & Tilden 600 N. Arrowhead Avenue, Suite 300 San Bemardino, CA 92401-1148 Subject: Review of the Harveston Specific Plan Traffic Study Dear Ms. Alexander-Kelley: We have conducted a brief review of the Revised Traffic Impact Study for the Harveston Specific Plan EIR dated July 19, 2000, prepared by Wilbur Smith Associates (WSA). In summary, we have identified three major issues that should be addressed prior to approval of the project, and may require a revision to the traffic study. The three issues involve estimated trips for the residential components proposed within the Specific Plan, trip generation estimates for the service commemial portion of the Specific Plan, and potential conflicts and safety hazards between existing truck traft'lC on Equity Drive and the proposed project. Residential Trip Generation The Institute of Transportation Engineers (II'E) Trip Generation is the industry accepted source for developing trip generation estimates and, for some land uses, provides both a weighted average rate and a regression equation. WSA appears to have utilized the regression equations for determining trips attributable to the 1,921 single-family detached housing (ITE land use code 210) dwelling units proposed within the Specific Plan. As shown in the graphs on pages 263 - 265 of Trip Generation (attached), the number of residential dwelling units produces an inverse correlation with trip generation based on the regression equations. This implies that as the size of a subdivision gets larger, the rate of trip making gets smaller. This illogical result is why the transportation profession does not utilize these regression equations, since it is commonly acknowledged that the number of trips per a residential household is a function of socioeconomic attributes such as income, household population, or size of the house, not the number of homes in a subdivision. Otherwise, the following irrational scenario could occur. Suppose a 1,000 lot subdivision is proposed in ten equal phases. Application of the regression equations to the overall 1,000 units yields a trip generation estimate of 9,435 daily, 709 a.m. peak hour and 855 p.m. peak hour trips. Application of the weighted average rates yields a trip generation estimate of 1,134 daily, 79 a.m. peak hour and 107 p.m. peak hour trips. When multiplied by a factor often, the corresponding trip generation becomes 11,343 daily, 795 a.m peak hour and 1,074 p.m. peak hour trips, exceeding the trip generation per 1,000 units. The purpose of this exercise is to demonstrate 5/10/01 (R:\GVS033\Task 6 - Harveston TS Rev\peer review.va)d) t why it is the standard practice within the transportation industry is to use the weighted average rates, and not the regression equations, for developing trip estimates from single family homes. The trip estimate for the single family residential components within the Specific Plan should be revised using the ITE weighted average rates, which yield a trip generation estimate of 18,384 daily, 1,364 a.m. peak houi' and 1,575 p.m. peak hour trips. A comparison of trips estimated for single family homes as contained in the WSA study versus application of the weighted average rates is presented in Table A. Table A - Single Family Trip Generation Comparison Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Source Rate Trips Rate Trips Rate Trips ITE Rates 9.57 18,384 0.75 1,441 1.01 1,940 WSA Study 8.33 16,002 0.71 1,364 0.82 1,575 Trips under-counted 2,382 77 365 % under-counted 15% 6% 23% As shown in Table A, the traffic study appears to have undercounted 365 p.m. peak hour trips associated with single family residential development, or 23% of the p.m. peak hour estimate from the WSA study. This could be a significant quantity of under-counted trips, given the general traffic congestion in the Temecula area. Service Commercial Trip Generation Although there is no footnote or text discussion explaining the derivation of the trip rates used for estimating trips for the service commercial land use, the rates appear to be reasonable for the range of potential uses that could be developed within the service commercial planning areas. However, due to the flexibility provided by the Specific Plan, it also appears that land uses with higher trip making characteristics could be developed within the service commemial area. Under this worst case example, a regional shopping mall of approximately 1,000,000 square feet could be developed based on a floor area ratio (FAR) of 0.25 applied to the 92.65 net acres of service commemial area. Such a center would result in higher trip generation than analyzed in the WSA study. A summary of this comparison is provided in Table B. As shown in Table B, the traffic study appears to have undercounted 131 p.m. peak hour trips associated with the development of the service commercial land use, or 6% of the p.m. peak hour estimate from the WSA study. Again, this could be a significant quantity of under-counted trips, given the general traffic congestion in the Temecula area. 5/IO/OI(R:\GVSO33\Task 6 - Harveston TS RcvXpeer review.wl)d) 2 Table B - Service Commercial Trip Generation Comparison Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Source Rate Trips Rate Trips Rate Trips ITE Equations for na 26,995 na 505 na 2,299 Shopping Center WSA Study (per acre) 260 24,090 13.78 1,277 23.40 2,168 Trips under-counted 2,905 -772 131 % under-counted 12% na 6% One solution to this issue is to create a mitigation measure that establishes a "trip generation budget" per planning area. The trip generation budget concept should consider the maximum allowable trips generated within each planning area. This way, land use development flexibility can be maintained while traffic impacts greater than those analyzed in the WSA study can be avoided. Conflicts With Existing Truck Traffic Access to the proposed community park within Planning Area 1 of the Specific Plan appears to be proposed from Equity Drive. Currently, existing conditions on Equity Drive are characterized by a high percentage of heavy track traffic associated with the Winchester Highlands Business Park. The Specific Plan will in~'oduce the potential for conflicts between these existing tracks and pedestrians and passenger vehicles destined to and fi.om the community park. There does not appear to be any discussion regarding compatibility of the proposed community park next to the existing track oriented uses, especially the potential conflicts and hazards that may be created. Consideration should be given to requiring that the park be accessed via its own roadway system off of Ynez Road, thereby eliminating the direct conflict and safety haTard potential on Equity Drive. This concludes our analysis of the Revised Traft'lC Impact Study for the Harveston Specific Plan EIR. Please feel free to call me at (909) 781-9310 should you have any questions. Sincerely, LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. Raymond V. Hussey, AICP Project Manager Attachments: Excerpts fi.om Trip Generation (3 pages) 5/10/01(R:\GVS033\Ta~k 6 - Harveston TS Rev~oeer review.wpd) 3 Sir, die-Family Detached He, rising (210) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Dwelling Units ..." On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. Number of Studies: Avg. Number of Dwelling Units: Directional Distribution: 271 202 25% entering, 75% exiting Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation ]' 0.75 0.33 2.27 0.90 Data Plot and Equation 3,000 X x 1,000 .......................... ~ ....... x x x x x o 0 X = Number of Dwelling Units X A~tual Data Polnta Fitted Curve Equation: T = 0.700(X) + 9.477 -- Rttad Curve 2O0O ...... Average Rate R2 = 0.89 3OOO Tdp Generation, 6th Edition 264 Institute of Transportation Engineers Single-Family Detached Housing (210) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Dwelling Units On a: Weekday Number of Studies: Avg. Number of Dwelling Units: Directional Distribution: 348 198 50% entering, 50% exiting Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit I Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 9.57 4.31 21.85 3.69 Data Plot and Equation 30,000 0 0 X Actual Data Points X IOO0 X = Number of Dwelling Units ~ Fitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: Ln("r) = 0.920 Ln(X) + 2.707 2O0O ...... Average Rate a2 = 0.96 X Trip Generation~ 6th Edition 263 Institute of Transportation Engineers Single-Family Detached Housing (210) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: On a: Dwelling Units Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Number of Studies: Avg. Number of Dwelling Units: Directional Distribution: 294 216 64% entering, 36% exiting Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 1.01 0.42 2.98 1.05 lata Plot and Equation = 2,000 uJ x x x 0 o Actual Data Points 1000 X = Number of Dwelling Units Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) = 0.901 Ln(X) + 0.527 2oo0 ...... Average Rate R2 = 0.91 3000 Trip Generation, 6th Edition 265 Institute of Transportation Engineers June 20,2001 Mr. Chairman, Commissioner's, and Staff: My name is Ed Burke. I represent Channell. We have approximately 20 acres, $50,000 square feet, immediately adjacent to the project. We have several issues with regards to our facilities impacting with the project. Page 5 Background References several meetings we have had, but there has been no resolution to any of the issues we are trying to address. Page 6 The small triangular piece of property we are negotiating to buy from Lennar has been excluded from the project. Our ability to use it is in question, as there are many issues with respect to underground utilities, the Ynez Road realignment, etc. If this is not addressed as a condition of development, what assurances do we have to address our concerns and utilize the property? Page 11 Zoning Issues The proposed zoning change on the adjacent property to ours from neighborhood commercial to residential has impacts on the parC, design and the buffer between the uses. How can this be resolved without understanding the final alignment of Ynez? Page 27K The Community Park is to be completed prior to issuance of Phase 2 building permits. As stated in the city's response to our EIR questions, the final design of the part cannot be made until the street alignment is final. It is my understanding that that question may not be answered for 2-1/2 years. How does this fit in with the timing of the entire project? Page 36 & 36 The park recommendations of staff, Alternatives 4 or 5, do not appear to provide any buffer areas between the Business Park. Most of our concerns seem to be focused around the alignment of Ynez. Attached to these notes, is a letter to Debbie Ubnoske from Channell and a letter to Penelope Alexander from Raymond Hussey responding to the responses from the City on our traffic questions and my notes from the traffic study workshop. Thank you and we look forward to working together to resolve these issues. CHANNELL June 20,2001 Ms. Debbie Ubnoske City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92589 Dear Debbie: Channell Commercial Corporation still has many questions and issues that we feel have not been resolved at this time. Most of our concerns are tied to the realignment of Ynez and access to the park off Equity Drive. In discussions with Bill Storm of Lennar Communities, neither of us can plan for, or determine, the potential development impacts on each other without the Ynez Road alignment issue resolved. Your latest Phase I map includes the Southern portion of the "service commercial" area, which is in the area of the proposed Ynez realignment. This raises many concerns. There has also been discussion of building the park earlier than Phase 2. If the park is completed before the Ynez alignment is resolved; it appears the park traffic would be entirely routed through the industrial park and on Ynez. This would have direct correlation to the traffic study Channell has provided at no charge to the city. We believe that these unresolved issues have direct impacts not analyzed in the current "EIR". We look forward to working with the City of Temecula and Lennar Communities to resolve these issues. Sincerely, Edward J. Burke Vice President of Global Engineering EJB/sld 26040 Ynez Road - I~O. Box 9022 · Temecula, CA · USA · 9z589-9o22 tel 9o9,694-9~6o - fax 9o9.694-9~7o Jun-Z9-Ol 04:43p~ Froe-RIV ~ LSAi gogrrgsgz4 T-TSZ P.OZ/03 F-OZ$ ~une 20, 2001 Penny Alexander-Kelley Gresham, Savage, Nolan & Tilden 000 N. An'owhead Avenue, Shire 300 San Bernardino, CA 92,10 l- 1148 Subject: HarveslOn Specific Plan Dear Ms. Alexander-Kelley: LSA Associates, Inc. (LSA) has reviewed the City of Temecula's June 12. 2001 letter providing responses to your May l 1, 2001 comment letter addressing the Draft EIR for the Harvcston Specific Plan. The City's letter also includes responses from Wilbur Smith and Assoclales (WSA) to the three comments contained in our May 10, 2001 letter addressing their Hatveston Specific Plan traffic study. We offer the tbIlowing commentary, I.SA Comment 1: Residential Trip Generation There is no question that WSA has rigorously followed the step-by-step methodology contained in Chapter 3, "Guidelines for Estimating Trip Generation" from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (IT£) ?)'ila Generalion Handbook. However, the point that we made in our May 10, 2001 letter remains valid: we believe use of the equations for estimating trip generation of single family residential land uses to be incorrect and inconsistent with the ~r~thods custonmdly used in the transportation engineering profossion. Although they have tbilowed the steps correctly, such a mechanical application of the Trip Generatfon Handbook methodology regarding application et trip generation data ignores t~ common sense "check" of the results of this process. Chapter 2, "Selection of Independent V~inble and Time Period for Analysis," of the Trip GencrWtinn Handbook outhnes five characteristics of a preferred independent variable tbr generation What is in question here is the first characteristic, whereby lhe prefen~ed independent variable is "a "cause" for the variation in tr~p ends generated by a land use." It is not logical that the size of a single family residential project has anything to due with the per capita rate of trip rm'0, ing, which was thc result as applied by WSA. Since use of the equations as opposed to average rate~ results in lower trip generation, overall project impacts may b~ underestimated, and sufficient mitigation :nay not be identified. Thc mason why use of equations in this case is wrong was already identified in our previous letter where we showed that use of the equations yields less trips for a L000 home project in comparison to ten 100 home projects contiguous to one ~nother. The equations appear to relate trips to an independent variable defined as a specific number of horn,s, although the correct independent Jun-ZO-OI 04:4~P~ From-RIV 2 gOg~gS~Z~ T-r6Z P 03/03 variabte '&'as intended to be a single home. Although it is probable that a large single family subdivision would have a small number o[ internalized trips that would not reach outstde of the trip counting !orations of a trip generation sur'~ey, this still leaves os with an illogical eoneluslon. LSA Comntent 2: Service Commercial Trip Generation Measm,e 5 requires udditio0al studies to de~ormme the locatic, n and timing of circulation improvements. However, it does not addres~ our comments from May 10. 2001 whereby potential uses with trip generation greater than that analyzed in the ErR are permitted within the proposed Specific Plan, Again, thc EIR should add a ~n.ttigat~on measure that puts a ceiling on the amount of trips that ea~ allowed within the service commercial areas. LSA Comment 3: Conflicts with Existing Trucks The issue involves "t:Msting" truck use attd access on Eqmty D~ive and the proposal to place a park fronting on the east s~de of Equity Drive. Consideration shonld be gwen to placing d~e park so that belier land u~ compatibility is obtained. Otherwise. a less than adequate land nsc compatibility, such as proposed in the Specific Plan. results. Oiven that thc park has not been built yet, there are no significant constraints regarding where it could be located. To conclude, it is our professional opinion that the Draft EIR for the Harveston Specific Plan contains three circulation inadequacies that have not been addressed in the City's June 12.2(X'~l letter response to our original May 10, 2001 comments. These three issues include the tallowing: Under counted trips from the proposed single t~.mily homes due to an incorrect uSe of the trip generation equation~. The ELF, is missing a mitigatiou measure flint would put a ceiling on the quantity o1' trips from the proposed service commercial areas, so that impacts remain within those analyzed itt the EIR. · The prolYO~-xl park on Equity Drive should be relocated to an area w~th more compatible land Should yon have any more questions or '&ish to discuss this letter, please feel free to call me at (909) 7g 1.93 I0, Sincerely. LSA ASSOCIATES, INC, Raymond V. Hussey, AICP Project Manager Re: Traffic Mitigation Workshop Mr. Chairman, Commissioners, and Staff: My name is Ed Burke. I represent Channell. We have approximately 20 acres, 350,000 square feet, immediately adjacent to the project. We have been working with prospective developers and staff for years and most recently, with Lennar and Bill Storm and we appreciate the process of working together. We have several issues with respect to traffic and circulation, which we are discussing and are not comfortable with, at this time. We are concerned with the project's location next to a commercial/industrial area with respect to traffic safety issues, examples: large commercial carriers and families. How has the traffic flow been modeled from the commercial areas immediately adjacent on Ynez? Twenty-four-hour, 7-day, industrial use type traffic is somewhat incompatible with residential uses. We have employee traffic from: 6:00 AM to 8:00 AM; 3:00 PM to 6:00 PM; and 11:30 PM to 12:30 AM. Southbound Ynez access from existing business: How do planned signals affect traffic flow? What is the projected through traffic expected from Ynez, south of Winchester and north of Winchester? Is on street parking on Equity planned? As that puts commercial use and public uses together. There are some current occupants in the business park that have considerably large truck traffic. We have concerns with the realignment of Ynez and its proximity to our facility and our access concerns. With respect to continuation to Hot Springs Road, timing and controlled by whom, I have questions with the connection between on-site and off-site improvements. Our employees will take the shortest and most direct path they determine to get home even if that involves driving through residential streets. We would like a copy of the presentation CITY OF MURRIETA 26442 Beckman Court, Murrieta, CA 92562 Internet Address: Telephone: 909-304-CITY(2489) Fax: 909-698-4509 http.//murrieta.ca.us June 20, 2001 City of Temecula Members of the Planning Commission 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 Re: Planning Application 00-0189 (Harveston Specific Plan) Dear Commission Members: The City of Murrieta's Traffic Engineer, Hank Mohle, reviewed the traffic study for the Harveston specific Plan and his comments have been submitted to the Commission under separate cover. Based on Mr. Mohle's review, it is the City of Murrieta's position that the Transportation and Circulation impacts analyzed in the EIR for the project have been underestimated. For example, the traffic study prepared by Wilbur Smith Associates identified a project build-out date for all phases of the project in 2005. This build-out scenario includes the 112 acres of land designated as Service Commercial. Our concern with this assumption is that it is highly unlikely that the project will build out in 2005. Based on historical trends and the amount of vacant commercial property within the surrounding areas, absorption of 112 acres of Service Commercial land is not realistic. In addition, we also have concerns that the 1,921 residential units may not be built out in 2005 because of the amount of vacant residential land in the area. Our records indicate that there are approximately 23 large residential projects being proposed totaling over 34,000 dwelling units wi.thin the Murrieta, Temecula, and Southwest Riverside County area. These 34,000 units are in addition to the 1,921 uuits proposed by the Harveston Specific Plan. The reason that the above facts are significant is that the Harveston Specific Plan most likely will build-out several years beyond 2005, given the amount of available developable land and the historic growth rotes for the area. Therefore, the Mitigation Measures, in our opinion, will not be adequate to mitigate traffic to below a level of significance as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), because they were based on traffic impacts for build out in 2005, and not a later build out year. Consequently, it may not be feasible to achieve the Level of Service (LOS) of "D" or better as required by the Temecula General Plan. The City of Murrieta requests that the Resolution adopting the EIR for the Harveston Specific Plan, identify that Transportation and Circulation impacts will not be mitigated to less than significant levels and that a Statement of Overriding Considerations be adopted to reflect that the benefits of the project to the City of Temecula outweigh the unavoidable adverse environmental effects created by the project (ref CEQA 15093). Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this project and have our concerns entered into the record. Sincerely, Eme~st Perea Planning Manager C: Murrieta City Council Stephen Mandoki, Murrieta City Manager CITY OF MURRIETA MEMORANDUM DATE: TO: FROM: BY: RE: ~ 20, 2001 City of Temecula Planning Commission Jim Miller, Development Services Director Hank Mohle, Traffic Engineert~_~ Comments on Revised Traffic Impact Study Harveston Specmfic Plan EIR Dated July 19, 2000 Pursuant to your request, I have reviewed the subject study and provided my comments as follows. 1) PM Peak Hour Proieet Trip Generation From "Traffic Impact Study" Low. The proposed project has an estimated daily total traffic generation of 41,767 hip ends. The PM peak hour "in-bound" volume estimate is 2110 vph. The "om-bound" PM peak hour volume is estimated to be 1734 vph. Exhibit "A" shows the comparison of our trip project generation estimate to the project trip generation shown in the project's "Traffic Impact Study". The comparison shows that "Traffic Impact Study" (here after called "Study") trip generation estimates are lower than our estimates by the following percentages for the PM peak hour and daily periods: PM PEAK HOUR ] DALLY IN OUT -12% -13% -19% The use of the lower traffic volume estimates result in better "level of service" (LOS) results at the "Studf' intersections. 2) The technical traffic report for the EIR was not documented as being prepared and signed by a California licensed engineer and the report may, therefore, be subject to legal challenge. 3) Growth Rate Low. The five (5) percent growth for the period 1998 to 2005 as mentioned on page 13 of the project's "Traffic Impact Study" dated July 19, 2000 is significantly.below the measured 9.5% historical growth rate for Murrieta Hot Springs Road between Alta Murrieta and Whitewood Road as documented on Exhibit "B". If the four (4) 3,ear period 1998 to 2001 is used, the traffic volume data shown on Exhibit "B" indicates that the annual (compounded yearly) growth rate is 13.2%. It is concluded that the "Study's" ambient growth rate may be significantly low, at least for Murrieta Hot Springs Road. 4) Year 2002 Volume Analyses. Based on the traffic count taken on April 26, 2001 on Murrieta Hot Springs Road between Alta Murrieta and Whitewood Road that showed a total 24-hour volume of 25,798 (Exhibit "B") the PM peak hour total westbound volume was 1150 vehicles per hour. Figure 21 titled "2002 PM Peak Total Traffic Volumes, Background and ProJect shows th total westbound volume on Murdeta Hot Springs Road at Alta Murrieta to be 939 vehicles per hour. The actual Year 2001 counted volume is 211 vehicles per hour higher than the projected Year 2002 volumes. The projected "Study" volume is therefore 18% lower than the actual Year 2001 volmne. 5) Year 2005 Proiection For Murrieta Hot Springs Road. The projected Year 2005 total westbound (at Alta Murrieta on Murrieta Hot Springs Road) PM peak hour volume without the proposed project is 1847 vehicles per hour (see figure 24). Figure 29A titled "2005 Project Traffic Only" of the "Study" shows that the estimated total westbound PM peak hour project volume at Murrieta Hot Springs Road at Alta Murrieta is 298 vph. Adding the 2005 westbound PM volume of 1847 (without the project) to the 298 vph from the project the total is 1847 + 298 = 2145 vph. 6) Year 2005 Volume "Study" Analyses at Murrieta Hot Springs Road and Alta Murrieta. Figure 3lA titled "2005 With Project Scenario PM Peak Total Traffic Volumes" shows that the estimated PM peak hour total westbound volume is 1985 plus 150 = 2045 vph. This volume is 100 vph lower than the above calculation. Table 6, following page 27 of the "Study" shows that for Year 2005 with the project and with improvements the Murdeta Hot Springs Road at Alta Murrieta intersection will have a PM peak hour level of service (LOS) of"C" (22.7 sec) and a "critical v/c" of 1.00. It is not possible to determine from the "Study" the following that are involved in the LOS or "critical v/o" calculations: · Actual volumes used · "Lost time" assumption · "Saturation flow rates" · Peak hour factor · Signal cycle length · Definition of"critical v/c" i.e. is this for the critical movements or just one movement? Since this intersection is close to the northbound exit ramp of the 1-215 freeway coordination of the signals between the interchange and the Alta Murrieta at Murrieta Hot Springs Road intersection is an important issue to be considered in the overall analysis. The report (Figure 32B following page 30) shows that the recommended mitigation for this ..... ' m only" lane for westbound to northbound traffic. This intersection ~s an added right tu figure shows that the improvement is needed with project bmld-out but ~s not needed without the project. There are no geometrics, i.e. length of right turn lane, for this needed improvement in the "Study". Pro|ect Build-Out Year Beyond 2005. In attendance at the 4:00 p.m. meeting on May 14, 2001 at the Murrieta City Hall were Raymond C. Becker, Vice President, Community Development, Lennar Communities, Ernest Perea, Planning Manager and Hank Mohle, Traffic Engineer. Mr. Becker stated that the approximately 100 acres of"service commercial" of the Harveston Specific Plan would not be "built-out" until after Year 2005, compared to the completion date of 2005 for all five (5) phases as stated on page 6 of the July 19, 2000 "Revised Traffic Impact Study" by Wilbur Smith Associates. If the "build-out" year is after 2005 the ambient traffic volumes would be higher than the ambient traffic volumes shown in the Traffic Study for Year 2005. The "build-out" analyses for Year 2005 would, therefore, be incorrect and would not represent a realistic "level of service" (LOS) estimate at the "Study" intersections. With a "build-out" year beyond Year 2005, it is quite possible that it would not be practical (in terms of required improvements at the critical "Study" intersections) to achieve a LOS of"D" or better. If in fact, the "build-out" year for the project is beyond Year 2005, the "build-out" year traffic analysis should be redone for a realistic "build-out" year. 8) Southbound 1-15 Exit Ramp To Winchester. According to the "Study", the "existing" Year 1999/2000 PM peak hour traffic volume on the southbound exist ramp from 1-15 was 1661 vph (see Figure 8). Based on Figure 24 of the "Study" by Year 2005, this southbound I-15 exit ramp PM peak hour will increase to 2328 vph, without the project. With the project by Year 2005, this exit ramp PM peak hour volume will total 2359 vph (see Figure 3lA). Comparing the volumes in Figure 3lA and Figure 24 the proiect volume on this exit ramp for the PM peak hour is 2359 - 2328 = 31vph. This volume of 31vph is significantly (78%) lower than the proiect volume of 141vph for this ramp shown on Figure 29A. The existing queuing on the southbound 1-15 approach to this exit ramp is a well-known dangerous continuing situation. Many rear-end crashes per month are reported because of the queuing back onto the freeway lanes from the S/B ramp terminal signals at Winchester Road. The "Study" estimates that with the project the volume by Year 2005 could increase form 1661 vph to 2464 vph an increase of 49%! As shown in Figure 31 A of the "Study", the estimated Year 2005 PM peak hour volume with the project shows southbound volume from the 1-15 exit ramp at Winchester Road is 2359 vph. Of this total, 1418 vph (60%) are projected to turn left. Based on a Sim-Traffic simulation analysis, using the "Study's" projected Year 2005 PM peak hour traffic volumes and the proposed lane arrangement (after improvements) for the southbound exit for I-15 to Winchester Road intersection it is estimated that the southbound queue length will be more than 900 feet (assuming optimized signal timing). With this length queue, the southbound I-15 right hand thru traffic lane will still be impacted. It is clear that efforts in reducing this queuing by reducing the peak hour traffic volumes (or other means) are important from a safety point of view. 9) Level of Service (LOS) Analyses at Selected Intersections. Based on knowledge of the area four (4) intersections included in the "Traffic Impact Study" were selected for level of service (LOS) and operational characteristics review because they form a closely-spaced system of high volume, multiphase signals. The selected intersections are~ I.D. NAME NO. 1. Winchester Road and Jefferson Ave 2. Winchester Road and I-15 SB Ramps 3. Winchester Road and I-15 NB Ramps 4. Winchester Road and Ynez Road Year 2005 "with project" PM peak hour volumes from Figure 3lA of the "Study" and the · ' "Stud ' were used for the intersection lane configurations shown on F~gure 32A of the y' analysis. Since intersection No. 3 (Winchester at N/B Ramps) was not shown on Figure 32A, the lane arrangement currently existing as determined fxom aerial photos and a field review were used to establish the lane arrangement. Two (2) methodologies were used in the analyses. The first was use of using the "Highway Capacity" (Year 2000 edition) criteria and the Synchro Model. The second analysis was the use of the Sim-Traffic simulation model to evaluate the interaction of the closely-spaced intersections. The computer "out put" sheets for these two (2) calculation methods are included with this report and identified as Exhibit "C". A summary of the LOS results are listed below for these four (4) intersections that were assumed to be operating with optimized and coordinated signal timing with consideration for pedestrians and a background signal system cycle length of 120 seconds. The LOS summary shown below is based on the weighted average delay per vehicle for all the intersection movements. The stated minimum acceptable LOS is "D". YEAR 2005 TRAFFIC W1TH PROJECT, LOS AND AVERAGE DELAY PER ID INTERSECTION NAME VEHICLE, SEC. NO. ~ · 1 Jefferson & Winchester "D"; 49.9 sec./veh. "F"; 611 sec./veh.. 2 Winchester & 1-15 SB Ramps "F"; 131 sec./veh. "F"; 278 sec./veh. 3 Winchester and 1-15 NB Ramps "D"; 38 sec./veh. "F"; 93 sec./veh. 4 Winchester and Ynez "E"; 70 sec./veh. "F"; 495 sec./veh. The Sim-Traffic simulation results for 15 minutes shows higher average per vehicle delays because of queuing and the inter-action of those relatively closely-spaced signals. An ~ssue of equal importance to average delay per vehicle is "queue lengths" Both the Synchro and Sim-Traffic analyses show the queue lengths for each movement at the four (4) intersections. The excessive lengths of these queues will have significant detrimental impact on "up-stream" signals and driveways. In reviewing the performance of signal operations where signalized intersection spacing is relatively short, the "queuing" issue becomes of equal importance to the vehicle delay issue. It is concluded that there are excessive traffic volumes at these intersections compared to the overall geometrics and intersection spacing. TRIP GENERATION Temecula, CA (Phases 1 thru 4) : TRIP RATES* : DRIVEWAY VOLUMES : : ITE PROPOSED Land A;Mi Peak Hour PiM. Peak HOur Daily A.M: peak Hour P.M peakHour Daily LAND USE USe COde SIZE UNIT In Out In Out 2-Way in Out in Out : 2'WAY Single Family 210 1,528 DU 0.18 0.53 0.52 0.3 8.33 275 810 795 458 12,728 Apartments 221 393 DU 0.09 0.35 0.37 0.t9 6.tl 35 138 145 75 2,401 Neighborhood 820 20 TSF 1.87 1.t9 5.21 5.64 121.09 37 24 104 1t3 2,422 Shopping Commercial 820 t,009" TSF 0.38 0.24 1.37 1.49 29.87 383 242 1,382 1,503 30,t39 Totals II 730 I 1,214 2,426 2,149 47,690 DRiVEwAY voCUMES A.Mi PeekHour PiM Pea~ HO~r ' D~qlY In Out In Out 2,Way: I "Haveston Traffic Impact Study" Total Project Trip GeneratJon*** 1,137 1,687 2,110 1,734 41,767 · ** From Table4Afollowingpage2OofTmfficlrnpactStudy EXHIBIT A ~, Traffic Growth Oll Murrieta Hot Springs Road Between Alta Murrieta and Whitewood Road YEAR 24 HOUR VOL. COUNT DATE 1992 11,422 6/18/92 1993 1994 12,905 9/15/94 1995 1996 15,609 7/31/96 1997 16,067 6/26/97 1998 15,663 8/2/98 1999 19,055 6/14/99 2000 20,895 8/16/00 2001 25,798 4/26/01 Notes: 1) Data based on City of Murrieta traffic count records. 2) Average 9.5% / yr. increase compounded yearly for 9 years) EXHIBIT B EXHIBIT C City of Temecula WinchesterRd 5/22/2001 O:[d_Sync_Prtd_othtRt._79~RT79_Y201S_PM.sy6 City of Ternecula Winchester Rd 5/22/2001 O:~d_Syn c_Pr~d_oth~Rt._79~RT?9_Y2015_PM.sy6 City of Temecula Year 2005 (P.M. Peak Hour) 2: JEFFERSON AVE & WINCHESTER RD 5/22/20Ol LaneGr0i~pil :./:.ii!;::i:.iSELii:.~SET: S ER ::NW~ N~ NVVR i iN EL iN ET iN ER ii ~EiiS~ SWi~ Lane Configurations ~ ~'T~ ~ 'H' Fi~' 1~ ~ ff ~ ~,~ ff Total Lost Time (s) Satd. Flow (prat) Fit Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Satd. Flow (RTOR) Volume (vph) Confl. Peals. (#/h0 Confl. Bikes (~hr) Peak Hour Factor Growth Factor Heavy Vehicles (%) Bus Blockages (ffihr) Parking 0~hr) Mid-Block Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Tum Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Detector Phases Minimum Initial (s) Minimum Split (s) Total Split (s) Total Split (%) Yellow Time (s) Ali-Red Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Recall Mode Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, dl Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Stops (vph) Fuel Used(gal) CO Emmisions (g/hr) NOx Emmisions (g/hr) VOC Emmisions (g/hr) Dilemma Vehicles (~ Queue Length 50th (fi) ~334 Queue Length 95th (ft) #458 Intemal Link Dist (ft) 50th Up Block Time (%) 95th Up Block Time (%) Turn Bay Length (ft) 400 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4,0 4.0 4.0 3433 3476 0 1770 3539 2787 1770 5085 1583 3433 3539 1583 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 3433 3476 0 1770 3539 2787 1770 5085 1583 3433 3539 1583 12 609 218 509 789 678 91 120 742 1022 286 1249 281 715 504 509 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0% 0% O% 789 769 0 120 742 1022 286 1249 Pret Pmt Perm Pret 7 4 3 8 5 2 7 4.0 8.0 31.0 26% 3.5 0.0 Lag Yes None 27.0 0.23 1.02 46.5 76.0 E 889 26 1839 358 426 0 8 4 3 8 8 5 2 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 30,0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 30.0 40.0 0.0 19.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 33.0 33% 0% 16% 23% 23% 23% 28% 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lag Lead Lead Lead Lead Lead Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes None None None None None Coord 38.8 12.2 24.0 24.0 21.9 29.0 0.32 0,10 0.20 0.20 0.18 0.24 0.68 0.67 1.05 0.98 0.89 1,02 34.6 51.9 48.0 19.1 47.8 45.5 35.5 51.5 85.0 35.2 54.1 68.7 D D F D D E 56.0 55.8 57,4 E E E 949 113 878 838 276 1360 20 3 26 22 7 36 1406 219 1831 1542 484 2482 274 43 356 300 94 483 326 51 424 357 112 575 28 0 28 0 0 49 268 91 -329 209 213 -365 350 152 #-453 #338 #350 ~469 922 859 470 O:~d Sync PrOd oth~Rt 79~RT79 Y2015 PM.sy6 2: JEFFERSON AVE & WINCHESTER RD hankmooran-st51 200 200 200 0% 281 715 504 509 Perm Prot custom I 6 2 8 2 I 6 8 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 30.0 8.0 30.0 8.0 33.0 28.0 33.0 28.0 28% 23% 28% 23% 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lead Lag Lag Lead Yes Yes Yes Yes Coord None Coord None 29.0 24.0 31.1 24.0 0.24 0.20 0.26 0.20 0.51 1.04 0.55 0.70 8.1 48.0 38.4 0.0 10.1 52,5 19.8 8.7 B D B A 30.0 C 69 521 216 242 2 15 6 5 161 1049 401 341 31 204 78 66 37 243 93 79 0 0 38 0 39 ~154 92 191 122 rn~166 m97 m208 385 200 200 Synchro 5 Repo~ Page 1 City of Temecula Year 2005 (P.M. Peak Hour) .2: JEFFERSON AVE & WINCHESTER RD 5/22/2001 Lane:Group:::: ~: ~: ~: SEi;::.:SETi SER:i:N~: N~ iNWR::iNE~ i NE~ NER :.~ S~ :.SWi;~ 50th Bay Block Time % 32% 3% 10% 33% 3% 95th Bay Block Time% 15% 49% 17% 38% 45% 4% Queuing Penalty (veh) 28 48 31 99 111 8 i~i~::S~::'i::': ::: :.:i il ~i i ,,:.i :.::;:::.i ~,: ,:: ::: : :: ::::::: : :::::::::: ::::::::: Cycle Length: 120 Actuated Cycle Length: 120 Offset: 111 (93%), Referenced to phase 2:NET and 6:SWT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 120 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.05 Intersection Signal Delay: 49.9 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 100.9% ICU Level of Service F ~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Splits and Phases: 2: JEFFERSON AVE & WINCHESTER RD O:~d_Sync_Pr~d_oth~Rt_79~RT79 Y2015..PM.sy6 2: JEFFERSON AVE & WINCHESTER RD hankmooran-st51 Synchro 5 Report Page 2 City of Temecula Year 2005 (P.M. Peak Hour) 5: YNEZ RD & WINCHESTER RD 5/22~2001 Lane Configurations ~ ff ff lilt Total Lost Time (s) 4,0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Said. FIow(prot) 1770 4556 1362 3044 3143 1583 3433 6408 1583 3433 6337 0 Fit Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.802 0.950 0.950 Said. Flow (perm) 1770 4556 1362 3044 1929 1583 3433 6408 1583 3433 6337 0 Satd. Flow (RTOR) 101 253 244 436 15 Volume (vph) 198 590 702 1064 577 443 553 2053 869 417 2045 160 Confl. Peals. (#./hr) Confl. Bikes (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking 0Whr) Mid-Block Traffic (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Lane Group Flow (vph) 198 899 393 709 932 443 553 2053 869 417 2205 0 Turn Type Prat Perm Prot Perm Prat Perm Prot Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 I 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 Detector Phases 7 4 4 3 8 8 5 2 2 I 6 Minimum initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split (s) 7.5 29.5 29.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 29.5 29.5 7.5 29.5 Total Split (s) 16.0 30.5 30.5 27.0 41.5 41.5 21.0 45.5 45.5 17.0 41.5 0.0 Total Split (%) 13% 25% 25% 23% 35% 35% 18% 38% 38% 14% 35% 0% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 Ali-Red Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lead Lag Lag Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None None None None Coord Coord None None ActEffct Green(s) 12.0 25.6 25.6 24.0 37.6 37.6 17.0 41.5 41.5 13.0 37.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.21 0.21 0.20 0.31 0.31 0.14 0.35 0.35 0.11 0.31 v/cRatio 1.12 0.86 0.80 1.17 1.20 0.67 1.14 0.93 1.04 1,12 1.11 Uniform Delay, d1 54.0 40.1 15.1 48.0 44.4 15.0 51.5 37.8 18.7 53.5 40.9 Delay 129.4 41,1 18,6 128.0 129.9 15.8 65.8 31.0 20.3 117,1 91.5 LOS F D B F F B E C C F F Approach Delay 46.9 105.0 33.9 95.6 Approach LOS D F C F Stops (vph) 285 1007 208 1052 1366 291 565 1855 558 578 2974 Fuel Used(gal) 9 21 6 31 40 6 16 42 14 19 89 COEmmisions(g/hr) 612 1497 407 2132 2819 432 1114 2951 960 1335 6199 NOx Emmisions (g/hr) 119 291 79 415 548 84 217 574 187 260 1206 VOC Emmisions (g/hr) 142 347 94 494 653 100 258 684 222 309 1437 Dilemma Vehicles (~ 0 35 0 0 32 0 0 93 0 0 82 Queue Length 50th (ft) ~177 232 122 ,-391 -515 133 -257 438 *-108 -191 ~565 Queue Length 95th (fi) #330 232 #246 ~526 #659 255 m~255 m378 m#481 #294 #642 Internal Link Dist (fl) 895 724 244 1148 50th Up Block Time (%) 8% 19% 2% 95th Up Block Time (%) 6% 15% 13% Turn Bay Length (fi) 200 200 200 200 200 200 O:~d Sync PrOd oth~Rt 79~RT79 Y2015 PM.sy6 ...... Synchro 5 Report 5: YNEZ RD & WINCHESTER RD hankmooran-st51 Page 3 City of Temecula Year 2005 (P.M. Peak Hour) 5: YNEZ RD & WINCHESTER RD 5/22/2oot La~eGrO[ip;:.:.ii ii ii;ilSEl~i SE~i;SER: N~ N~iN~iiNEL iNET iii N ERi SWE:. S~ iSWR 50th Bay Block Time % 5% 39% 40% 23% 23% 3% 43% 95th Bay Block Time% 43% 5% 54% 50% 12% 19% 20% 16% 34% 47% Queuing Penalty (veh) 64 10 216 319 29 146 460 107 94 187 Cycle Length: 120 Actuated Cycle Length: 120 Offset: 11 (9%), Referenced to phase 2:NET, Stair of Yellow Natural Cycle: 150 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.20 Intersection Signal Delay: 67.9 Intersection LOS: E Intersection Capacity Utilization 101.5% ICU Level of Service F ~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th pementile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Splits and Phases: 5: YNEZ RD & WINCHESTER RD O:~d-Sync-PAd-oth~L79~RT79 Y2015_PM.sy6 5: YNEZ RD & WINCHESTER R~ hankmooran-st51 Synchro 5 Repo~ Page 4 City of Temecula Year 2005 (P.M. Peak Hour) 7: NIB Loop & WINCHESTER RD 5/22/2001 LaneGro~pi:. ;i ::. iiiN~::NWRi NETi NER!iS~:.iS~ Lane Configurations Satd. Flow (prot) Fit Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Volume (vph) Confl. Peds. (~hr) Confl. Bikes (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor Growth Factor Heavy Vehicles (%) Bus Blockages (#/hr) Parking (~/hr) Mid-Block Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Sign Control 0 0 4806 1362 0 5085 0 0 4806 1362 0 5085 0 0 2506 1617 0 788 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0% 0% 0% 0 0 2506 1617 0 788 Stop Free Free Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 70.1% ICU Level of Service C O:\d_Sync_Pr~_oth~Rt_79~RT79_Y2015_PM.sy6 7: N/B Loop & WINCHESTER RD hankmooran-st51 Synchro 5 Repo~ Page 5 City of Temecula Year 2005 (P.M. Peak Hour) 8:1-15 S/B RAMP & WINCHESTER RD 5/22/2001 ,Lai3eiG~'0~p :: i i i i i i SE :. :. SBE :: :. ~BRiii NW~:. NWR i:: NEE :.i NET NE R iSWL:iii Lane Configurations Total Lost Time (s) Satd. Flow (prat) Fit Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Satd. Flow (RTOR) Volume (vph) Confl. Peds. 0Whr) Confl, Bikes (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor Growth Factor Heavy Vehicles (%) Bus Blockages (#/hr) Parking (#/hr) Mid-Block Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Tum Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Detector Phases Minimum Initial (s) Minimum Split (s) Total Split (s) Total Split (%) Yellow Time (s) Ali-Red Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Recall Mode ACt Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio vic Ratio Uniform Delay, dl Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Stops (vph) Fuel Used(gal) CO Emmisions (g/hr) NOx Emmisions (g/hr) VOC Emmisions (g/hr) Dilemma Vehicles (~ Queue Length 50th (fi) Queue Length 95th (ft) Internal Link Dist (ft) 50th Up Block Time (%) 95th Up Block Time (%) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3433 0 2787 0 0 0 4999 0 0 5085 0 0.950 3433 0 2787 0 0 0 4999 0 0 5085 0 1920 25 1418 0 941 0 0 0 2705 356 0 788 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0% 0% 0% 0% 1418 0 941 0 0 0 3061 0 0 788 0 custom cu~om 7 2 6 7 6 7 6 2 6 4,0 4.0 4.0 4.0 8.0 8.0 29.0 8.0 43.0 0.0 19.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 58,0 0.0 0.0 19.0 0.0 56% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 48% 0% 0% 16% 0% 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 None Min 39.0 15.0 0,33 0.13 1.27 0.46 40.5 0.0 148.4 0.0 F A 2417 0 67 7 4681 499 911 97 1085 116 0 0 ~714 0 ~q~50 0 893 670 Turn Bay Length (ft) 480 O:~d Sync PrOd oth~Rt 79~RT79 Y2015 PM.sy6 8:1-15 S/B RAMP & WINCHESTER RD hankmooran-st51 Coord Min 54.0 15.0 0.45 0.13 1.35 1.24 32,6 52.5 161.5 136.3 F F 161.5 136.3 F F 5568 1272 165 36 11536 2514 2244 489 2674 583 171 42 ~1117 ~273 m#1109 m#294 385 221 24% 13% 23% 18% Synchro 5 Repo~ Page 6 City of Temecula Year 2005 (P.M. Peak Hour) 8:1-15 S/B RAMP & WINCHESTER RD 5/22J2001 95th Bay Block Time % 45% Queuing Penalty (veh) 376 726 121 Cycle Length: 120 Actuated Cycle Length: 120 Offset: 112 (93%), Referenced to phase 2:NET, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 50 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.35 Intersection Signal Delay: 130.9 Intersection LOS: F Intersection Capacity Utilization 107.3% ICU Level of Service F ~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Splits and Phases: 8:1-15 S/B RAMP & WINCHESTER RD O:\d._Sync_Pr~_ot h~Rt_79~RT79 Y2015_PM.sy6 8:1-15 S/B RAMP & WINCHEST~.R RD hankmooran-st51 Synchro 5 Report Page 7 City of Temecula Year 2005 (P.M. Peak Hour) 10:1-15 NIB RAMP & WINCHESTER RD 5/22/2001 ~ai~eG~p iiii:.: ii:.i:::: :.N~ii NBE :.NBR iSE~i;~ERi NEE:: NETi:.NER ~WL:.iS~iSWRiiii i Lane Configurations ~ i· ~'~"~ 'H'~ j~ Total Lost Time (s) Satd. Flow (prot) Fit Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Satd. Flow (RTOR) Volume (vph) Conn. Peds. (#/hr) Conn. Bikes (~hr) Peak Hour Factor Growth Factor Heavy Vehicles (%) Bus Blockages (#/hr) Parking (#/hr) Mid-Block Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Detector Phases Minimum Initial (s) Minimum Split (s) Total Split (s) Total Split (%) Yellow Time (s) Ali-Red Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Recall Mode Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio vic Ratio Uniform Delay, dl Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Stops (vph) Fuel Used(gal) CO Emmisions (g/hr) NOx Emmisions (g/hr) VOC Emmisions (g/hr) Dilemma Vehicles (#) Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (fi) Internal Link Dist (fi) 50th Up Block Time (%) 95th Up Block Time (%) ,Turn Bay Length (ft) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3433 0 1583 0 0 0 5085 0 0 4537 1362 0.950 3433 0 1583 0 0 0 5085 0 0 4537 1362 2 207 1091 121 0 969 0 0 0 2505 0 0 1616 2216 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1;00 1.00 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O% 121 0 969 custom custom 3 3 8 3 8 4.0 4.0 8.0 8.0 48.0 0.0 48.0 40% 0% 40% 3.5 3.5 0.0 0.0 0% 0% 0% 0 0 0 2505 0 0 2582 2 6 1250 Free Free 2 6 4.0 4.0 29.0 8,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 72.0 0.0 0.0 72.0 0.0 0% 0% 0% 60% 0% 0% 60% 0% 3.5 3.5 0.0 0.0 Coord Coord 68.0 68.0 120.0 0.57 0.57 1.00 0.87 1.03dr 0.92 22.2 22.9 0.0 8.4 5.7 11.3 A A B 8,4 7.5 A A 1388 991 775 23 27 17 1610 1859 1203 313 362 234 373 431 279 73 56 0 286 108 776 m198 m106 m688 220 387 10% 14% 11% None None 44.0 44.0 0.37 0.37 0.10 1.66 24.9 37.9 25.1 241.4 C F 77 2207 2 65 123 4578 24 891 28 1061 0 0 31 ~1103 52 #1357 672 954 53% 63% O:t~_Sync_Pr~d_ot h ~Rt_79~RT79_Y2015_PM .sy6 10:1-15 NIB RAMP & WINCHESTER RD hankmooran-st51 Synchro 5 Report Page 8 City of Temecula Year 2005 (P.M. Peak Hour) ,.1,0:1-15 NIB RAMP & WINCHESTER RD 5/22/2ool 95th Bay Block Time % Queuing Penalty (veh) 129 153 Cycle Length: 120 Actuated Cycle Length: 120 Offset: 4 (3°,{,), Referenced to phase 2:NET and 6:SWT, Start of Yellow Natural Cycle: 50 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.66 Intemection Signal Delay: 38.6 Intersection LOS: D intersection Capacity Utilization 115.1% ICU Level of Service G ~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. dr Defacto Right Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a right lane. Splits and Phases: 10:1-15 N/B RAMP & WINCHESTER RD O:~d Sync PrOd oth~Rt 79~R'r79 Y2015 PM.sy6 10:1-15 N/B RAMP & WINCHESTER RD hankmooran-st51 Synchre 5 Report Page 9 City of Temecula Year 2005 (P.M. Peak Hour) 20: S/B Loop & WINCHESTER RD 5/22/2001 ~G~u~iiiiiiiiiiii EBLiiEBRilNE~iiiiNET iSV'[rl~i SWRii i:.:: i i : i ii i :.ii :.iiii i ii Lane Configurations ~ ~ ~ Satd. Flow (prot) Fit Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Volume (vph) Confl. Peds. (fflhr) Confl. Bikes (~hr) Peak Hour Factor Growth Factor Heavy Vehicles (%) Bus Blockages (~hr) Parking Mid-Block Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Sign Control 0 0 0 5085 5085 1583 0 0 0 5085 5085 1583 0 0 0 2506 788 949 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0% 0% 0% 0 0 0 2506 788 949 Stop Free Free Control Type: Unsignalized I ntersection Capacity Utilization 62.1% ICU Level of Service B O:~_Syn c_Pr~d_oth~RL79',RT79_Y2015_PM.sy6 20: S/B Loop & WINCHESTER RD hankmooran-st51 Synchro 5 Report Page 10 City of Temecula Winchester Rd 5/22/2001 O:~d Sync PrOd oth~Rt 79~RT79 Y2015 PM.sy6 City of Temecula Year 2005 (P.M. Peak Hour) SimTraffic Performance Report 5/21/2001 2: JEFFERSON AVE & WINCHESTER RD Performance by movement Total Delay (hr) 63.7 46.2 6.1 3.1 16.4 26.4 2.0 10.8 2.5 2.3 0.6 0.2 St DelNeh(s) 300.7 401.5 434.1 125.7 124.3 155.9 55.2 26.5 8.8 Fuel Used (gal) 30.2 21.7 2.9 2.0 10.3 15.2 1.4 7.6 1.7' 2.3 116 019 CO Emi~ions (g) 821 549 81 87 406 466 61 364 70 124 230 103 Vehicles Enter~ 0 0 0 37 144 ~0 50 279 58 139 73 80 Houdy ~ Rate 0 0 0 132 548 784 232 1160 208 500 292 312 2: JEFFERSON AVE & WINCHESTER RD Intersection Performance Total Delay (hr) 115.9 45.9 15,3 3.1 180.3 St DelNeh (s) 410.0 128.9 34.9 598,5 Fuel Used (gal) 54.8 27.5 i0.8 4:'7 ............... CO Emissions (g) 1450 958 495 457 3~'60 Vehicles Entered 0 401 387 292 1080 Houdy ~it Rate 0 ...... ~ 1464 1600 1104 4168 5: YNEZ RD & WINCHESTER RD Pefiorman~ b~ movement Total Delay (hr) 3.7 2.3 2.4 36.5 18.4 14.1 3.1 2.4 0.4 15.7 97.6 11.5 St DelNeh (s) 268.8 47.9 48,1 1086.5 1040.1 1115.4 107.7 17.8 5.1 1049.1 1500.4 2278.7 Fuel Used (gal) 2.3 3.4 3.4 18.9 9,7 7.2 1.9 2.8 0.6 8.3 50.6 5.9 CO Emi~ions (g) 142 408 369 573 323 229 65 157 32 319 1~4 158 Vehicles Entered 53 1~ 170 120 65 41 92 375 149 50 216 18 Houdy ~it Rate 164 580 608 476 244 192 412 15~ 592 224 9~ 72 O:~d_Sync_Pr~l_oth~Rt_79~RT79_Y2015_PM.sy6 5/21/2001 hankmooran-st51 SimTraffic Report Page I City of Temecula SimTraffic Performance Report 5: YNEZ RD & WINCHESTER RD Intersection Performance Year 2005 (P.M. Peak Hour) 512112001 Total Delay (hr) 8.4 69.0 5 8 124 8 208.1 St [~eiN~h (S) 77.0 107914 28;9 1~67.6 485.0 Fuel Used (gal) 9.1 35.8 5.4 64.7 114.9 CO Emissions (g) 919 1126 254 2141 4439 Vehicles Entered 379 226 616 284 1505 Hourly Exit Rate 1352 912 2540 1280 6084 7: N/B Loop & WINCHESTER RD Performance by movement Total Delay (hr) 0,4 0.5 1.3 St DelNeh (s) 0.1 0.2 33.7 7: N/B Loop & WINCHESTER RD Intersection Performance Total Delay (hr) 0.9 1,3 2.2 ~;i ~;!;!~ ~ :~i~ :i:~-::~:4~ ii:~ ;~: :~:~:.::;:;~:~.,:.... ;:: ;: i~: ::;i:;~.!i:. ~;:~; ? CO Emissions (g) 821 27 848 Vehicles Entered ~-7~ O:M_Sync._P r~d._ot h ~Rt_79~T79._Y2015_PM.sy6 5/2112001 hankmooran-st51 SimTraffic Report Page 2 SimTraffic Performance Report Year 2005 (P.M. Peak Hour) 512112001 8:1-15 S/B RAMP & WINCHESTER RD Performance by movement Total Delay (hr) 43,3 21.3 ~4 ~ St DelNeh (~) 6~0.1 ~5814 3§.5' ~i~'"':~§'i~ Fuel Used (gal) 23.6 12.9 6.9 0.9 4.5 8:1-15 S/B RAMP & WINCHESTER RD Intersection Performance Total Delay (hr) 556.7 35.8 223.4 263.2 el Used (gal) 36.4 7;8 Houdy Exit Rate 1560 2036 ...... 10:1-15 NIB RAMP & WINCHESTER RD Performance by movement Total Delay (hr) 2.0 20,6 0.6 3.8 3.3 CO Emissions (g) 87 396 164 310 139 O:\d Sync PrOd oth~Rt 79~RT79 Y2015 PM.sy6 5/21/2001 hankmooran-st51 SimTraffic Report Page 3 City of Temecula Year 2005 (P.M. Peak Hour) SimTraffic Performance Report 512112001 10:1-15 NIB RAMP & WINCHESTER RD Intersection Performance Total Delay (hr) 22.6 0.6 7.1 30.3 St Del/Veh (s) 360.7 3.2 35.6 84.6 Fuel Used (gal) 13.7 1.9 7.4 23.0 ~: E ~J ~P 13~;i (~);!;.~i~; :: :;;ii./~:i:':i:~::ii: ~ii!::::}:! ;?:ii :;:il. ~ ~ ~! i:i; ~! :/i ;: !:i: 9.9., .~i;:i :: :.i~i:/ 58~ :: :: :;: ;;: :::! ;~ co Emissions (g) 483 164 448 1095 Vehicles Entered 226 418 531 1175 ~ iai* ~i~ i~ '=!i;.!ii:X!: f: ?::: :. ;:?? :::;! ?:! ':;i:; ':[,i:j': :/::.;;i 2 ~;:! 5I.: :! ~: 2 7;iZ:i '-:::: ? ~ ~:. :; i:! ;:: i?,!~.~ :~ ?:~ ::.:,; 3.!i!:!?,: i: !i:: :: ?? Houdy Exit Rate 852 1708 2132 4692 20: S/B Loop & WINCHESTER RD Performance by movement Total Delay (hr) 0.1 0.3 0.3 Fuel Used (gal) 1.8 0.7 0.9 CO Emissions (g) 211 113 68 ~ehiciesEnt~:ed 4i6 '"~'"'"' ~3'~ ;':~-:~::~?~:'~:':~7 ;~ ::~:, ;%; ~]:::~; :~ ?;~: ::~:?xT~::~a;~¢~5: ~¢~;~!~,'::;~ ~;: 8 ~::~:;',:~:~ :: 20: S/B Loop & WINCHESTER RD Intersection Performance Total Delay (hr) 0.1 0.6 0.7 ~y//~eh(~):! ?i/~::~:f ~;~};-::~:' i~;i~::, ~7i~ ::h~,::' a ~5~ :~ :~' ~ :.~.i: ;:;;: ~:::'.: ~z': ?. ~- '~:,:-.~ Fuel Used (gal) i":~ ~;6' ................. ~:~ .... ::: ..... CO Emissions (g) 211 181 392 O:~d_Sync_Pr~_ot h~Rt_79~RT79_Y2015_PM .sy6 5/21/2001 hankmooran-st51 SimTraffic Report Page 4 City of Temecula SimTraffic Performance Report Total Network Performance Year 2005 (P.M. Peak Hour) 5/21/2001 Total Delay (hr) 506,4 St Del/Veh (s) 758.9 Fuel Used (gal) CO Emissions (g) Vehicles Entered Hourly Exit Rate 353,0 20962 2322 9192 O:~d_Sync_Pr~l_oth \Rt_79\RT79_Y2015_PM .sy6 5/2112001 hankmooran-st51 SimTraffic Report Page 5 City of Temecula Queuin~l and Blockin~ Report Intersection: 2: JEFFERSON AVE & WINCHESTER RD Year 2005 (P.M. Peak Hour) 5/21/2001 Directions Served L T TR L T T R R L T T T Average Queue (ft) 419 937 947 99 876 879 237 221 201 414 448 487 ~5i~Q~ ~fi~ :i .i;~ ~ ! ~ :2~8 877 :,890 2~0 ~9 263 ii~ ~8 628 Link Distance (fi) 939 939 862 862 495 495 495 Queuing PenaEy (veh) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage BJkTime(%) 1.00 0.00 0.33 0.19 0.48 0.36 0.11 0.42 0.67 Interse~ion: 2: JEFFERSON AVE & WINCHESTER RD Directions Served R L L T T R O:~d_ Sync_ PrOd _ oth~Rt _ 79~RT79 _ Y2015 _ PM.sy6 512112001 hankmooran-st51 SimTraffic Report Page 6 City of Temecula Queuing and Blockin~l Report Intersection: 5: YNEZ RD & WINCHESTER RD Year 2005 (P.M. Peak Hour) 512112001 N~Directions Served L T T TR R L t LT T R L L ~ ~ ~ ~ urn :.':Q ~ ~e:,m~ :: :i!; ~:.; ~.: i~:. !:53 ~ ;~ ~:~,:~ 5z ~?.i:.'; ~ ~!:~i:i: :2s:~:! i ::;:::: ~: i;:~: 2.~ ~ ;:~i: i:~5 ~ :i:i:~ i:; ~:i; ~ ~::~:; :~' ~ ':~ ~ Average Queue (fi) 224 397 292 260 186 175 234 735 729 105 205 204 Link Distance (fi) 897 897 897 897 718 718 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0 0 Storage BIkTime(%) 0.88 0.01 0.00 0.62 0.75 0.07 0.00 0.17 0.25 Interse~ion: 5: YNEZ RD & WINCHESTER RD Directions Served T T T T R T T T L L T T Average Queue (fl) 201 158 150 178 116 52 47 47 101 154 1159 1176 Link Distance (fl) 221 221 221 221 401 401 401 1163 1163 ~i~(~::; O,~!~i::':~:! !i::i:i:~ :: ii~;? 0;~!:i:i-o:~:i :~ :::! :~:- !!: :i ;:;; :;:4 :~ ~!::i! ~ :! :: ~!?i.~ 0 0 Storage BIk Time (%) 0.01 0.01 0.22 t~{~ ~"~ Y~E'Z ~O A W N~HESTER RD Average Queue (fl) 1174 1176 Queuing Pen~ii~'~ ........... 6 ~ + Storage BIk Time (%) O:\d Sync PrOd oth~Rt 79~:~T79 Y2015 PM.sy6 5/2112001 hankmooran-st51 SimTraffic Report Page 7 City of Temecula Queuin~l and Blocking Report Intersection: 7: NIB Loop & WINCHESTER RD Year 2005 (P.M. Peak Hour) 5121/2001 Directions Served TR R T T T Average Queue (fi) 3 25 122 74 70 Link Distance (ft) 214 214 86 86 86 ~Sfi~Bik,:~M:6~:(%~ !:'!:!~;i:,!?i ;! i!:~ i; 0~ ~"0~: 0~ ~ :~, ~ ~ :=.~'~:: ~;~';~;;: ~: ~:'~ ~:~::~:; ~:~ :'~ ;: :,~:, Queuing Penalty (veh) 103 36 37 Storage BIk Time (%) Intersection: 8:1-15 S/B RAMP & WINCHESTER RD Directions Served < < R R T T TR T T T Average Queue (ft) 909 912 278 24 310 340 369 280 266 259 Link Distan~ (fi) 896 8~ 354 354 3~ 214 214 214 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 23 74 513 247 161 127 O:~d_Sync_Pr~d_ot h ~Rt_79~RT79_Y2015_PMsy6 5/21/2001 hankmooran-st51 SimTraffic Repo[t Page 8 City of Temecula Queuing and Blockin~l Report Intersection: 10:1-15 NIB RAMP & WINCHESTER RD Year 2005 (P.M. Peak Hour) 5/21/2001 Directions Served < < R T T T T T TR R T T Average Queue (fi) 700 701 703 74 80 91 259 364 474 475 56 243 Link Di~ance (fi) 686 686 686 231 231 231 401 401 401 401 221 221 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0 14 35 840 538 2 382 Intersection: 10:1-15 NIB RAMP & WINCHESTER RD Directions Served T Average Queue (ft) 231 Link Distance (fl) 221 Storage BIk Time (%) Intersection: Bend #19 Directions Served Average Queue (ft) [i~kDistance (fi) Queuing Penalty ~ B~ ~ ~:~) O:\d-.Sync_Pr~d_ot h~RL79~RT79_Y2015_PM .sy6 5121/2001 hankmooran-st51 SimTraffic Report Page 9 City of Temecula Queuin~l and Blocking Report Intersection: 20: S/B Loop & WINCHESTER RD Year 2005 (P.M. Peak Hour) 512112001 Directions Served T f Link Distance (fi) 231 231 231 Queuing Penalty (veh) Nework Summary OAd_ Sync_ PrOd _ oth~Rt _ 79~RT79 _ Y2015 _ PM.sy6 5121/2001 hankmooran-st51 SimTraffic Report Page 10 July 10, 2001 City of'l'emecula Planning Department Debble Ubnoske, Director cc: C-ueniero cc: Mathewson cc: Olhasso cc: Telesio cc: Chiniaeff Re: Harveston Specific Plan (SCH#99041033) ! request that these remarks be made an ofl~dal part of the record. I ara opposed to the Harveston Project. This development will create serious impacts that, even after mitigation measures, are unacceptable. Section 5.1, Land Use Compatibility I urge the planning commission not to approve the Revised General Plan Land Use Designations to Exhibit 12 of the ~.IR. The revision reduces the area zoned Low-Medium by 29.4 acres, and increases the area zoned Medium by 29.4 acres. The original calculations for the EIR (Exhibit 12) are correct. 'The data was calculated using the "Winchester Hill~ Speeitie Plan" Detailed Land Use Summary. The acreage was compiled into eategorias that more closely resemble the Land Use Designations that the city adopted for its General Plan in 1993. The Harveston Draf~ F_IR was prepared November, 2000. The Temeeula Planning Dept. did not request a revision of the General Plan Land Use ' ' - · . . DesLcm~t~ons until the planmng comm~eqlon meetmg on June 2 I, 2001. During the planning meeting, the revised information was not made available to the public. Furthermore, I strongly urge.the commission not to approve the proposed amendment/upzone to the ~eneral Plan Land Use Designations. The amendment would further reduce the area zoned Low-Medium to ! 50.9 acres, for a tohal reduction or' 125.3 acres. The area zoned Medium would be increased to 139. l acres, for a total increase of 100.1 acres. The EIR (Section I. I) reports that the overall Harveston site is 552 acres. Exhibit 12 reports that the Existing General Plan Land Use (Residential) Designations are: 276.2 acres of Low-Medium (3-5 alu/ac max.), 39.0 acras of Medium (7-12 du/ac max.), and 17.5 acres of High (I 3-20 du/ac max.). In comparison, the Wolf Creek EIR (SCH #gg030705) reports the overal! site is 557 acres. The Wolf Creek Statistical Summary repons that the Land Use Designations are: 4. I acres of Low (.5-2 alu/ac max.), 332.7 acres of Low-Medium (3-5 alu/ac max.), 29.0 acres of Medium (7-12 alu/ac max.), and 14.1 acres of High (13-20 du/ac max.). The data contained in Exifibit 12 is consistent with the Land Use Designations the City adopted for/ts General Plan in 1993, and previous projects of the same acreage, and should not be amended. The Harvcston SIR also £~ils to ider~ti~ the projection of various residential lot s~es, other th~ the minimum ~d averse residen~ lot s~e. ~r~i~ly, this proje~ could build eve~ residenti~ lot, in the ~w-M~ium ~ at 5,000 s.~ This project ~so proposes to b~ ~ ~e Low-M~ium ~ r~iden~ lots ~ ~ as 4,000 s.E The Wol~Cre~ ~oj~t w~ required to build on lots ac This r~ul~mem should be m~t~n~ or t~s project, ~d a r~on~le ra~o off,get fi . . ~er ~ 5,000 s.~ lots to ~ lots em~Hsh~. Section 5.3 Transportation / Circulation The EIR clearly identifies significant impacts to traffic/circulation. The intersections at Winchester road and Jefferson Ave., 1-15 SB Ramps, Ynez Road, and Nicolas Road ace identified as already operating at LOS D. The project will generate approx/mately 41,767 additional dally vehicle trips. Table 6 reports that the level of service on Winchester Road at Ynez Road, and Margarita Road will worsen to LOS D at AM Peak, and LOS F at PM Peak, ' - . · intersection at m 2002, ~nth the addit)on of Harveston traffic. However, the Winchester Road an{the 1-15 SB Ramp will reportedly operate at LOS C. Anyone who has ever used this ramp knows this must be a mistak~ It is wishful thinking to b ' · · eheve the mmganon measures will reduce impacts to I~s than significant levels along Winchester Road. The City Build-Out gn~!ysis Findings state that the City's currently adopted Circulation Plan results in significant impacts at City build-out .particularly along Winchester Road. This is why alternative plans to add another interchange on the 1-15 are discussed in Section 6.3 of the EIR. How will it be funded'? Will the developer pay anything towards the interehange¢ When would the interchange be completed? - Section 5.4, Air Quality T.he. Harveston Project will result in s/~eant impacts to air quality, even at~er nut~gation measures. Under CEQA Ouidelines, this project requires a Statement of .Overriding Considerations. This project's benefits do not outweigh the significant tmpacts it will have on our air quaiity. What is more important than breathing clean air? The City Of Temecula cannot continue to approve projects at these densities, that create significant impacts on traffic elreu/at~on and air quality. Furthermore, considering the City recently announced plans to sue Riverside County because of'changes in development pla~% and zoning amendments/upzones, t ds )rresponsible to approve an amendmenffupzoae for this project. This is nothing more than a carefully calculated plum t o c~rcumvent the Growth Management Act/on Plan, and increase densities. An increase of 592 units (44%) over the project low density is not acceptable, even with the reported amenities. TllaokyotLfor your time and attention re ard' ' . ~~.._ g mg this matter. MaYk Broderink -- 45501 Clubhouse Drive Temecula~ Ca. 92592 July 12, 2001 To~ From: Temecula Planning Commission John and Klm Kelliher 29909 Cone Castille Temecula, CA 92591 909-699-9463 Re: Harveston Project We would like to take this opportunity to express our support for the Harveston project under consideration today. As four-year residents of the community, reg/stered voters, parents of three, we have a sincere interest in preserving the quality of Temecula. It was the beauty of the city and the obvious well-planned nature of its streets and residential communities that attracted our family here four years ago. We have seen an amazing amount of growth since that time. But we have to sav that Temecola has handled the challenges of growth rather well. ' The city will continue to grow, no matter how much slow-growth advocates try to stop it. The focus should be no__.! on stopping growth, but on manag/ng that growth in a way that preserves the attractiveness and quality of life of the area. We believe Harveston is the .type of project that can help do that. After a review, we have come to believe that the developers have adequately addressed the necessary road improvement projects, schools and other infrastructure considerations. And the project itself- with its lake, community gathering areas, retail centers, and various types of housing-- is truly innovative~ ............ The type of community Harveston offers has the potential to become that sort of family- oriented, almost-utopian society where neighbors help each other, feel safe and are part ora greater community. To us, it is exactly the type of project that we should welcome into this area. You might have heard the key line from the movie, Field of Dreams: "Build it, and they w/Il come." In Temecula's case, if we don't build it, they xv/ll come an,vway. Let's continue building the types of communities that we can be proud of and that preserve the charm of our city. Johfi and Klm Kelliher Temecula residents ATI'ACHMENT NO 17 CITY RESPONSE LE'I'rER TO CHANNELL COMMERCIAL R:\S l'XHarveston SPXCiIy CounciI\STAFFRPT 7-24-01.doc 27 City of Temeculll 43200 Business Park Drive. PO Box 9033 - Temecula - California. 92589-9033 (909) 694-6400 .- FAX (909) 694-6477 June 12, 2001 Ms. Penelope Alexander-Kelly GRESHAM, SAVAGE, NOLAN & TILDEN, LLP, 600 N. Arrowhead Ave., Suite 300 San Bernardino, CA 92401-1148 Dear Ms. Alexander-Kelly: This letter is response to your letter dated May 11,2001 on behalf of the Channell Family Trust and Channell Commercial regarding the Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) prepared for the proposed Harveston Specific Plan. Pursuant to the requirements of Sections 15088 and 15132 of the State of Califomia Environmental, Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines (Title 14, CCR, Section 15000 et seq.), City of Temecula Planning Department prepared responses to comments by the persons, agencies and organizations on the Draft EIR for Harveston Specific Plan, received during the public review pedod, which was held from November 1,2000 through December 18, 2000. The Response to Comments/Final EIR document, dated February 2001 serves as the Response to Comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Harveston Specific Plan project. The document contains all information available in the public record related to the Draft EIR and responds to comments in accordance with Section 15088 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. Although the comment letter prepared by Gresham, Savage, Nolan and Tilden, LLP on behalf of Channell Family Trust and Channell Commercial Corporation, is dated May 11,2001, which is five (5) months beyond the close of the public review period, the City of Temecula Planning Department is providing the following responses to the comments raised in the above referenced letter. A copy of your comment letter showing the breakdown of the comments and responses is enclosed with this letter. Response1 Introduction The introductory section of the comment letter makes references to "earlier plans," which had, according to the comment letter, portions of the area adjacent to the existing business park designated for additional industrial park development. The letter further states that "when the City rezoned the area and was considering the SweetWater Specific Plan, Channel stated its concerns..." However, these statements are not entirely correct. First, the earlier plan (1993), which was the initial City General Plan, designated this area as business park. The existing City General Plan, amended in 1995, designated the area to the west as Service Commercial, to the north as Neighborhood Commercial, and to the north and east of the existing business park as Medium Density Residential (7-12 dwelling units per acre). Second, when the City rezoned the area R:\S P\Harveston SP\Channe~esp..doc in 1995 it was not considering the "SweetWater" Specific Plan, but rather the "Winchester Hills" Specific Plan, which was proposed by Bedford Development Company. The SweetWater Specific Plan, which is the predecessor to the current Harveston Specific Plan, came into being about 1998 and has Lennar Communities as its owner/developer. The proposed Harveston General Plan designations west of Ynez Road are proposed to remain Service Commercial (Exhibit 13 of the Draft EIR and Final EIR). However, the areas north and east of the existing business park are proposed to be "low medium" density residential (3-5 dwelling units per acre) and open space (i.e., the proposed community park). It is the City's belief that the community park is a more compatible use with the existing business park compared to medium density residential of the existing General Plan land use. Furthermore, the proposed zoning for the project site (E~ibit 14a of the Draft EIR and Final EIR) designates the area immediately north of the existing business park (with the realignment of Equity) as light industrial, which is also more compatible with the existing business park. The analysis of Alternative 2 (Development under Existing General Plan) to the proposed project contained in the Draft EIR on page 6-24 clearly indicates that development of Harveston Specific Plan is below the general plan build out, and the proposed traffic (i.e., number vehicle trips) from the proposed Specific Plan is lower compared to the build out of the existing General Plan designations. Therefore, the "proposed" General Plan and Zoning designations, under the Harveston Specific Plan, present a superior and more compatible land use and takes into account the sensitivity of the existing uses around the project site. With respect to the commentor's concerns on traffic impacts and trip generation undercount for the proposed project, please refer to Responses A-1 through A-3, prepared by the project traffic engineer, Mr. Bob Davis of Wilbur Smith and Associates. Additionally, regarding the general comment on the 'inadequacy" of the Draft E R, the Draft EIR has been prepared pursuant to CEQA Guidelines, and the City as the lead agency has properly analyzed the potential impacts that may arise related to traffic and circulation, pedestrian safety, land use conflicts and noise. As supported by the responses provided below, the traffic study has analyzed the existing, plus future, build out scenarios and takes into account traffic generated by all the proposed uses, and the proposed number of dwelling units and traffic generated by the project area below the existing General Plan. Therefore, the Draft EIR is adequate, and per section 15088.5 of the CEQA Guidelines "does not" require re-circulation. Response 2 Surrounding Land Use Conflict Issues The Harveston Draft EIR has acknowledged the existence of the Winchester Highlands Business Park, including Channell Commercial. The Business Park has been introduced as one of the surrounding land uses (Section 3.1, Project Location, of the EIR). Additionally, Section 4.4, Local Setting, of the Draft EIR discusses location of Winchester Highlands Business Park, and as noted by the commentor Exhibit 2, Local Vicinity/Surrounding Land Uses shows the existing Winchester Highlands Business Park. Regarding location of the Community Park as a buffer, professional land planners consider a "park" as a good transitional use between residential and commercial uses. This use is consistent with the City of Temecula General Plan, and based upon several prior meetings between City staff and representatives of Channell Commercial. It was acknowledged that the community park would provide a good land use buffer and is more compatible than the existing General Plan designation of Medium Density residential. The five (5) design alternatives for the community park (refined per suggestions from Temecula Community Services Department) were developed considering compatibility between the proposed park and the existing Winchester Highlands Business Park (i.e., Channel Commercial) uses. The final community park design will be completed upon the final approved alignment for Ynez Road. The final park design developed by City staff will take into account the existing adjacent land uses. R:\S P\Harveston SP\Channe~.esp..doc Response 3 The location of the community park within Harveston is consistent with the City of Temecula General Plan. The express intention of every community or public park is to draw not only local residents, but also for the facility to be used by other members of the community as well. This in turn will bring some additional traffic, unrelated to the residential development into the vicinity of the community park. However, because park usage in the City is during non-peak hours, the additional traffic will not necessarily result in additional peak hour congestion. Additionally, on page 5-42 of the Draft EIR, the project trip generation table includes 800 daily tdps for the 16-acre community park. Please see following responses A-1 to A-3 for traffic/circulation. Response 4 According to Mr. Bob Davis of Wilbur Smith Associates, the number of trucks using Equity Drive is not sufficient to cause a significant impact. The majority of the trucks will use County Center Drive rather than the Equity Drive. Finally, Equity Drive is built to a 78' Industrial Collector standard and few of the vehicle trips will be generated by the Harveston project. Additionally, please refer to Response A-3, below. Response 5 This comment does not raise an issue requiring a response under CEQA. 'lhe comment is noted and will be forwarded to the appropriate decision-makers. Traffic/Circulation and Pedestrian Safety Issues Response 6 Traffic/Circulation Issues Please refer to Response A-3, below. Response 7 The following response has been prepared by Mr. Hans Giroux of Giroux and Associates: Diesel engines are not major CO emitters compared to automobiles. Diesel engines emit far more NOx than cars per vehicle, and diese exhaust contains carcinogenic particulates. NOx emissions are important on a regional scale Jn their role as an ozone precursor, but not as a "hot spot" pollutant. Diesel exhaust particulates are forecast to be reduced dramatically over the next several years, and no impacts to Harveston residents and off-site users are anticipated. Any local air quality issues are thus related to CO emissions which will be minimally affected by truck routing. CO emissions from all vehicles, including a substantial (9%) truck fraction, were included in the project air quality analysis. A screening level microscale air quality "hot spot" analysis was conducted for two intersections, Winchester/Ynez and Murrieta Hot Springs/Margarita. This analysis incorporates worst-case atmospheric dispersion conditions and maximum traffic to predict CO concentrations in very close proximity to the roadway edge. The peak one-hour concentrations area predicted as follows: Winchester / Ynez 6 ppm Murrieta Hot Springs / Margarita 6 ppm Source: CaltransAir QualityTechnicalAnalysis Notes, 1988. R:~S P\Harveston SP\ChanneResp..doc Existing peak hour background CO levels are 5.0 ppm. It would require a local contribution of 15 ppm to equal the California one-hour CO standard. The maximum theoretical combined background (5 ppm) plus local (6 ppm) concentration is 11 ppm. Based upon theresults of this analysis, there will be no CO "hot spot" within the project vicinity. Response 8 Based on the following Response A-3, the analysis contained in the EIR for Harveston Specific Plan, and incorporation of proposed mitigation measures and design guidelines, there will be no hazards anticipated due to a design feature or incompatible uses. The analyses contained in the EIR are adequate per the CEQA guidelines. Response 9 Pedestrian Safety Issues Little, if any, organized sports activity occurs on sport parks between the hours of 7 am and 3:30 pm Monday through Friday. Peak sport park use hours will be Monday through Friday4 to 9 pm and all day Saturday. During design development TCSD may consider additional onsite parking to help mitigate conflicts. Conflicts should be limited based upon the number of trucks coming to the area, the times for delivery and the peak hour of park usage. Additionally, please refer to responses to traffic/circulation issues, below. Response10 Noise Mr. Hans Giroux, acoustical engineer for Giroux and Associates, has provided the following response: Parks are considered as both noise-sensitive receivers as well as noise generators from active recreation. Allowable noise exposures for community parks are therefore slightly less stringent than for usable exterior residential space. The noise standard for siting active recreation uses is 70 dB CNEL, rather than the 65 dB CNEL standard generallyapp ed to residential uses. This siting standard is based upon the CNEL (Community Noise Equivalent Level) metric. CNEL is a weighted 24-hour exposure. Isolated truck movements within the Business Park will not measurably increase the CNEL at the adjoining proposed community park. The noise level from 115 trucks per hour at a 25 mph travel speed is 70 dB (FHWA-RD-77-108, calveno REMELs) at 50 feet from the travel path. It would require 2,760 trucks during a 12-hour period traveling as close as 50 feet to tl~e proposed community park to exceed 70 dB CNEL. As indicated by the commentor (page 4, 2"a paragraph of the comment letter), Channell's e:4sting operations involve a tota of 28 trucks per day. The Business Park will never generate 2,760 daily truck trips within 50 feet of the proposed community park interface with the development of the 14arveston project. Noise-sensitive recreation would, furthermore, not be placed directly at the park boundary, but generally more in the interior to further increase the buffer distance between any Business Park activity and recreation users. Any reasonable assumptions of both Business Park activity levels and/or park use layouts suggest that there is zero constraint of one use upon the other. Active recreation ball fields and other community park uses operate very successfully in close proximity to heavily traveled arterials or freeways. A shared boundary with a Business Park would neither impact the ability of business to conduct its normal operations or for park users to enjoy community amenities. There are, therefore, no anticipated significant noise impacts that would require additional mitigation, or that would render the EIR as "fatally defective." R:\S P\Han, eston SP\ChanneResp,.doc Response 11 The comment is acknowledged and will be forwarded to the appropriate decision-makers. Additionally, based on the responses provided above and below, it is the opinion of the City of Temecula that the Draft EIR is adequate and does not need to be revised or recirculated. AI'rACHMENT - LSA ASSOCIATES, INC., MAY 10, 2001. The following responses have been provided by Mr. Bob Davis of Wilbur Smith and Associates (WSA), traffic consultant for the project, based on the comments provided in the letter by LSA Associates, Inc., dated May 10, 2001: Response A-1 Residential Trip Generation - WSA agrees that the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation is the industry-accepted source for developing trip generation estimates for proposed development projects. The ITE Trip Generation publication is a three volume set of documents that includes a "Trip Generation Handbook." The Trip Generation Handbook sets forth ITE's recommended practice concerning the use and application of trip generation data/research contained in the ITE Trip Generation documents. The Trip Generation Handbook clearly states the recommended practice regarding the use of regression equations and weighted average rates. Regression equations are recommended when sufficient data and other factors exist that validate the use of the equations, in summary, ITE recommends that the regression equation be used when: ;Parr~~ c,h d.a. ta; 2) the calculated R2 value (leve of · J awening units being studied falls within the cluster of data points used to calculate the regression equation. If all three of these conditions exist, then the regression produces as estimate of trip generation that is more accurate based on the research data than use of the average rate. As can be seen in the ITE Tdp Generation Data Plots that were attached to the LSA Associates letter, there are clearly more than 20 data points and data correlation value is well above 0.75. Additionally, the number of single-family residential units (1,528) falls within the cluster of data points (e.g. from under 100 to approximately 2,900). Therefore, the ITE recommended practice was used for the Harveston Specific Plan traffic study. Response A-2 Service Commercial Trip Generation - The service commercial trip rate was derived based on a careful review of the types of uses that are allowed within the service commercial zoning and the typical mix of uses that currently occur along the 1-15 corridor in Temecula. While the assumption that the entire site develops as regional shopping center type commercial (predominantly retail commercial) would probably yield the highest trip generation estimate, it does not appear to be realistic given the proximity to the Promenade Mall, adjacent Power Center; and Palm Plaza. Furthermore, this would not be typical of the variety of uses that currently occur along the 1-15 corridor. A mechanism (i.e., traffic mitigation monitoring program - refer to Mitigation Measure 5 of the EIR) is currently in place that will allow for the monitoring of traffic generation and off-site impacts as future phases of the project are proposed for development. Response A-3 Conflicts with Existing Truck Traffic - Due to the configuration of Equity Drive and County Center Drive, the layout of the Winchester Highlands Business Park, and how access is provided to Ynez Road, it would appear that most traffic and truck traffic uses will continue to use County Center Drive. While there may be a higher than typical number of trucks being generated specifically by the Channell Commercial business, the total number of trucks (up to 28 per day) in our opinion is not a volume of truck traffic that would present a safety concern for pedestrian activity at the park. The R:XS 15Harveston SP~ChannclResp..doc 5 primary parking area for the park will be on the park site (i.e., 100 space parking lot) thereby minimizing the potential for conflicts. Furthermore, much of the truck traffic will be occurring early in the morning and not during peak usage time of the park. With regard to the concerns about truck traffic being able to turn left onto Ynez Road from County Center Drive, Ynez Road has been designated a high capacity Major Roadway on the County and City of Temecula Circulation Element for over 15 years. As the City nears build-out, it is expected that significant volume, s of traff c will be using the Ynez Road corridor whether or not the Harveston Specific Plan Project is implemented. At some point in the future, it is likely that traffic volumes at this intersection will reach levels that warrant a traffic signal The future traffic signal would facilitate the left turn movement that is of concern to Channell Commercial. In summary, the Planning Department feels the Draft EIR project was prepared pursuant to regulations of CEQA and meets the requirements therein. The Planning Commission will consider the proposed project on June 20, 2001. The project will subsequently be presented to the City Council for their consideration. If you have any additional questions or would like to discuss this matter further, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Dave Hogan Senior Planner Enclosure R:\S PXHarveston SPXChannelResp..doc A'I'I'ACHMENT NO 18 MATERIAL AND LETTERS CONCERNING SCHOOL IMPACT MITIGATION R:\S P~larveston SPXCity CounciI~STAFFRPT 7-24-01.doc 28 June 26, 2001 Ms. Patty Anders City of Temecula, Planning Department 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 Subject: Harveston School Agreements Response to Planning Commission Meeting on June 20, 2001 Dear Ms. Anders: As you know, we have been touting the fact that Harveston will be providing improvements first, that is, facilities being built prior to pulling permits for the construction of Phase I homes. In addition to providing off-site and on-site street and park improvements, we are also absolutely committed to the continued expansion of Temecula's marvelous school program. In that context, we are pleased to respond to your phone call from the other day, and the questions posed by Commissioner Mathewson at the subject Planning Commission meeting. In October 1998, Lennar Communities executed a school fee mitigation agreement with the Temecula Valley Unified School District whereby Lennar committed to pay $16,545,500 in school fees. The total value of the fees was based on Lennar's proposed development program of 585 attached and multi-family dwellings at $6644 per unit, and 1374 detached dwellings at $9213 per unit. The dwelling unit total included the 38 homesites previously developed on the east side of Margarita at Date Street. The school fee payments were further broken down into two groupings, those fees (50%) immediately payable at issuance of building permits, and those fees (50%) which were to be deferred in the event the district was unsuccessful in securing school construction funding from the state. The deferred fees were then divided into elementary school, middle school and high school obligations. The agreement indicated that the elementary school fee would equal approximately 32.4% of the total deferred fee and be payable within 5 years of the first building permit; the middle school fee would equal approximately 27% of the total deferred fee and be payable within 6 years of the first building permit; and the high school fee would equal approximately 40.5% of the total deferred fee and be payable within 8 years of the first building permit. 24800 Chrisanta Drive, Mission Vieio. CA 9?rflOq - (OzlOl qon_nnnn Page 2 June 26, 2001 Additionally, the 1998 agreement required Lennar to grant an option to the TVUSD to convey approximately 10 acres of land for the construction of an elementary school within the Harveston community. The district was required to make their decision to acquire the property prior to approval of the 450th building permit. About a year after execution of the fee mitigation agreement, Lennar was approached by the TVUSD regarding conveyance of the elementary school parcel to the district. The district disclosed that they had an opportunity to secure state funding for an elementary school. They also indicated that they needed a 12 acre parcel of land, rather than 10, that they couldn't wait for the property to be entitled, that they needed a finished site, that they needed utilities and street access, and that they needed to be open for business by fall, 2001. The district further revealed that they would have to pay for the land through school fee credits granted to Lennar for the yet to be entitled Harveston project. On March 1, 2000 Lennar Communities executed a purchase and sale agreement with TVUSD to convey a 12 acre finished graded school site to the district for the sales price of $1,795,000. Also, in cooperation with the City of Temecula, Lennar agreed to install road and utility improvements to the school parcel at an approximate cost of $2,000,000. These improvements were to be built at Lennar's risk, inasmuch as the property was not entitled. In October 2000, the district advised Lennar that TVUSD had secured state funding for construction of the elementary school, and that the obligation for the elementary school portion of the deferred school fee had been satisfied. As of this date, the school and Lennar's improvements are better than 90% completed, and this facility will be opening in late August. Lennar has also been advised by TVUSD that construction funding has been secured for the middle school and that Lennar's deferred middle school obligation has been satisfied. As of the date of this letter, the Harveston school obligations are as follows: Fee Residential Residential M/F M/F Total Category At Permit Deferred At Permit Deferred Obligated Elem. School $6,329,300 Satisfied $1,943,400 Satisfied $8,272,700 Middle School (Incl.) Satisfied (Incl.) Satisfied (Incl.) High School (Incl.) $2,563,400 (Incl.) $787,100 $3,350,500 Total $6,329,300 $2,563,400 $1,943,400 $787,100 $11,623,200 Page 3 June 26, 2001 Of our original $16,545,500 school fee obligation, Lennar is still required to pay $11,623,200. This includes $8,272,700 in fees payable at building permit; and in the unlikely event that the high school construction is not funded by the state, Harveston will be required to pay an additional deferred fee of $3,350,500. Also, keep in mind that Lennar is owed fee credits for the $1,795,000 property it conveyed to the district. It is anticipated that these credits will be cashed in during the first phase of Harveston construction. Ms Anders, if you have any questions about this, or if you require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me. I have also copied Dave Gallaher, Director of Facilities Services at TVUSD, you may wish to contact him regarding our school agreements. Additionally, would you please pass this correspondence on to the Planning Commission, as mentioned earlier in this letter, Commissioner Mathewson had questions on this subject at the meeting of the 20th. Sincerely, Bill Storm Project Director Enclosures: TVUSD Satisfaction of Deferred Obligation for Elementary School Letter Dated October 12, 2000 TVUSD Satisfaction of Deferred Obligation for Middle School Letter Dated August, 11, 2000 CC: Ray Becker, Lennar Communities Dave Gallaher, TVUSD October 12, 2000 Dave Gallaher Director of Facilities Services Temecula Valley Unified School District 31350 Rancho Vista Road Temecula, CA 92592 RE: TVUSD/Lennar Mitigation Agreement; ..Satisfaction of EI~i Deferred Fee Obligations Dear Dave: I am writing this letter to memorialize the fact that the Deferred Fee Obligations under Section 3(e) of the Agreement dated October 2, 1998 (the "Mitigation Agreement") . between Lennar and the School District are now satisfied. To memorialize the satisfaction of the Elementary School Deferred Fee, please sign the enclosed copy of this letter and return it to me for my files. Sincerely, / Bill Storm - ~ ~ Project Director Enclosure cc: Penny Allen, Allen & Company Tom May, Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps Acknowledged and agreed that the Elementary School Deferred Ag~;t Section 3(e)have been satisfied in full. Fees under Mitigation 24800 Chrisanta Drive. Mission Viejo. CA 9269'1 - (949) 598-8500 August 11, 2000 Dave Gallaher Director of Facilities Services Temecula Valley Unified School District 31350 Rancho Vista Road Temecula, CA 92592 TVUSD/Lennar Mitigation Agreement; Satisfaction of Midd~_le School Deferred Fee Obligations Dear Dave: I am writing this letter to memorialize the fact that the Deferred Fee Obligations under Section 3(0 of the Agreement dated October 2, 1998 (the "Mitigation Agreement") between Lennar and the School District are now satisfied. To memorialize the satisfaction of the Middle School Defe~ed Fee, please sign the enclosed copy of this letter and return it to me for my files. Sincerely, ~ Project Director Enclosure cc: Penny Allen, Allen & Company Tom May, Lute, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps Acknowledge~nd agreed that the Middle School Deferred Fees under Mitigation Agree?efi'~ Section 3(f) have been satisfied in full. 24800 Chrisanta Drive, Mission Viejo. CA 92691 - [949) 598-8500 ATTACHMENT NO 19 MATERIALS AND LETrERS CONCERNING LAKE LIABILITY R:\S PXHarveston SP~City CounciI\STAFFRPT 7-24-01.doc 29 CITY OFTEMECULA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Councilmembers Planning Commissioners Patty Anders, Project Planner July 6, 2001 Additional Information on the Lake Access to the General Public and a Draft Copy of the Harveston Development Agreement. Attached is a memo from Herman Parker in response to the Planning Commission's inquiry regarding allowing the general public to have access to the lake and the possibility of obtaining insurance if the lake is opened to the public. The second item is a draft copy of the Harveston Development Agreement and the corresponding attachments. Please be aware that although it is a draft document, the Assistant City Attorney has indicated that this document represents a substantially completed document, approximately 96% complete. It is still, however, a work in progress to resolve the few remaining issues (approximately 4%) and therefore, additional changes may be made. Any changes will be communicated to you the night of the public hearing on July 12, 2001. CITY OF TEMECULA ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT GROUP MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: RE: Shawn D. Nelson, City Manager Gary Thornhill, Deputy City Manager Debbie Ubnoske, Planning Director City of Temecula Planning Commission Herman D. Parker, Director of Community July 3, 2001 Lake insurance Issues Servic~ At the last Planning Commission meeting, staff was requested to investigate the feasibility of an insurance company providing coverage for a privately owned and operated lake facility, if the facility is open and accessible to the general public. Over the last few days I have contacted insurance companies that represent HOA owned and maintained lakes and lake park facilities similar to the facility proposed in the Harveston development. These sites include Lake Forest, Woodbridge in Irvine, Lake Mission Viejo, Sunnymead Ranch Lake in Moreno Valley, East Lake in Yorba Linda, Menifee Lakes Association and Rancho Santa Margarita Lake. Four (4) different insurance companies represent these HOA facilities. Marsh Insurance represents Lake Forest, Woodbridge and Mission Viejo. I spoke with agent Randy Hughes who informed me that all of these lakes are privately owned and maintained by the Homeowner's Associations. Some of these facilities permitted the public to access the grounds around the lake, but none of them permitted the public to have access to the bodies of water itself. Mr. Hughes stated that although he felt it would be possible to find an insurance carrier to insure public access to a private lake, he felt the premiums would be high and could be cost prohibitive for the HOA. He knows of no HOA that has taken on that responsibility. LaBarre/Oksnee Insurance represents Sunnymead Ranch Lake and East Lake. Both of these facilities are privately owned and maintained by a HOA. The public is not allowed access to the lake, unless they are present as a guest of HOA members. Agent Scott Oksnee informed me his insurance company would not be willing to take on the additional liability of allowing the public to have access to the body of water. He also stated that it may be possible to obtain insurance, but the premiums may be fairly substantial. The premium for insurance carriers is based on exposure. The more exposure you have for accidents to occur, generally the higher the rate for the premiums. Once again, his company would not be willing to insure an HOA owned and maintained Fake if the public had complete access to the facility. R:~IGLERG~MEMOS\Harveston Lake Insurance Issues,doc Tompkins & Company Insurance represents Menifee Lakes Association. Agent Martha Cook informed me that the facility is privately owned, maintained and operated by the HOA. The facility does not allow public access to the lake unless you are guest of a resident of the HOA. Ms. Cook emphatically stated that her company would not insure any lake that was open to the general public. My final contact was with Edward Jacobs & Company Insurance. Agent Marc Nelson informed me that his company provides the insurance coverage for the lake in the Rancho Santa Margarita development. Mr. Nelson stated that the Rancho Santa Margarita Lake does allow the public to use the grounds around the lake, however the public does not have access to the body of water itself, unless they enter the facility through the Lake Club as a guest of a resident. Mr. Nelson stated that his company would not be willing to provide insurance for a privately owned HOA lake facility if the general public had complete access to the facility. He went on to say that there may be a few companies out there that would be willing to provide this insurance, however he cautioned that the premiums might be excessive. In summary, it would appear from the companies that I have been able to contact that most HOA owned and maintained lake facilities do not allow the general public access to the body of water itself, however some do allow public access to the grounds around the lake. If public access were granted at these facilities, the premiums would be substantial. Staff feels that public access to a lake park and the surrounding grounds in the Harveston development would be a tremendous asset. The trail and open space will provide the public the opportunity of walking and jogging and other passive recreation opportunities. 95% of the recreational uses that are provided by the Harveston lake facility are available to the public without access to the body of water itself. Such is the case for the Temecula Duck Pond, one of our premier City park facilities, which allows no access to the body of water and is still thoroughly enjoyed by the community on a daily basis. If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. cc: City Council Phyllis Ruse Cathy McCarthy Patti Anders Saied Naaseh Dave Hogan R:~ZIGLERG\MEMOS\Harveston Lake Insurance Issues.doc ATTACHMENT NO 20 COMMUNITY MOBILITY ENHANCEMENT PLAN RAS P~-larveston SPXCity CounciI~STAFFRPT 7-24-01.doc 30 Harveston Community Mobility Enhancement Plan (CMEP) This purpose of the Community Mobility Enhancement Plan (CMEP) is to provide a wide array of options for residents of Harveston to move within their Community, as well as the City of Temecula and other surrounding destinations. Focus has been placed on reducing dependency upon the automobile. The goal is to have a safe, efficient system that provides mobility for people of all ages. Enhanced mobility leads to more personal freedom and increased opportunities for social interaction. Potential options may include: a shuttle system, walking, hiking and jogging paths, bike lanes, ridesharing/carpools, vanpools, school pools, walking school buses, commuter services, appropriately situated land uses {employment and services nearby) and enhanced communications amongst the residents. Shuttle Loops (Private and/or Public) The Harveston Depot is located in the Village Center of the community. Convenient, safe and well- landscaped paths are provided for the residents to get to the Village Center. The Depot is envisioned to be a hub of activity within the community. · Potential shuttle destinations could include the following: · Promenade Mall. · Industrial area of City of Temecula & Murrieta. · Adjacent employment areas. · Day Middle School. · Chaparral High School. · Temecula Sports Park/CRC. · Mt. San Jacinto College. · Senior Center/Old Town. · Post Office. · The Loop Road (transport residents to the school, village, lake/lake park and the Community Park). ·City of Temecula Community Functions. · 4~ of July Parade/Fireworks. · Festival of Lights Parade (December). · Council& Commission meetings. · A special rate for passes should be considered for Harveston residents. · The coordination of resources will be beneficial to utilizing resources in the most efficient manner. The following agencies and programs should work in conjunction with each other: · Local programs: · RTA. · TVUSD. · Smart Shuttle. · Dial-a-ride. · Resoumes/funding soumes to be explored: · State of California. · Federar programs. · Private (non-project). · Private (project). · LocaVregional. Specific Plan Figure 3.1 (Land Use Plan). This Plan has been designed with clustered units located in proximity to Harveston Lake/Lake Park and the Village Center. According to RTA, these densities create the "efficiencies" to support a shuttle system. Multiple paths and trails lead to the Harveston Depot in the Village Center. Specific Plan Figure 7.4 (Public Transit Plan). This Plan shows existing RTA routes and stops as well as routes and stops proposed within Harveston. RTA has indicated that the shuttle could serve the project initially at the Harveston Depot located in the Villager Center. This component can be marketed to potential buyers. · The program should be promoted with a regular marketing campaign. The mobility of Harveston residents should be made to be fun. In addition, the safety, reliability and convenience of the systems need to be stressed. The following should be encouraged: · Unique shuttle design. · Promotions. · Coupons/discount tickets. · Gifts. · Recognition events. A survey should be conducted when residents move in. Find out where they want to go, how often, etc. and provide the necessary shuttle services to meet their needs. Walkinq to School Harveston has been designed as a walkable community. Sidewalks, paseos and multi-purpose trails connect all portions of the project. These pathways are well landscaped and vehicular conflicts are reduced to provide safe and convenient routes for walkers. Open-ended cul-de-sacs provide easy access to the Loop Road Paseo and remove potential obstacles to walkers. Pedestrian friendly short cuts are available throughout the project, including paths to the elementary school. Create programs to foster walking to the area schools (Harveston Elementary School and Chaparral High School). · Explore the possibility to provide incentives for the walkers (i.e., tokens, trading cards, and gitt certificates from local businesses). Work this into the school's athletic or fitness programs. · The model has been established: '"Walking School Bus" features from "Street Reclaiming" by David Engwicht. · Create a safe walking environment. · Establish a volunteer program, which is coordinated by Harveston's Lifestyle Maintenance Organization (LMO), that schedules parents, eldedy, etc. to chaperone the children to and from the elementary school · Coordinate with the TVUSD to make the crossing @ the Santa Gertrudis Creek safe for the students going to and from the high school. A crossing exists at the Margarita Road Bridge and there is an entrance from the Creek to the school site. Trails The mobility of Harveston residents will also be affected by the extent of the on-site and off-site regional trails system. As these develop, the transportation options will be enhanced. · Biketrail maps can be obtained on-line. · Walking. · Walking path maps can be obtained on-line. · Use calming devices (i.e., signage) to encourage motorists to drive slowly in heavy pedestrian areas. · Special Events. · Harveston Hiking Day. · Fund-raising walk-a-thons. · Trail clean-up day. · Specific Plan. · Figure 4. 7: Bicycle Plan. This plan has been developed to provide bike lanes and paths within Harvestan and ties into existing and planned bike lanes and paths. · Figure 6.1: Open Space and Recreation Plan. This plan illustrates the open space and recreation components of Harveston. Walking paths are abundant throughout the project and connect key open space and recreation components. · City-wide Trails Plan. This Plan is currently being developed. Harveston will serve as a point of origin and destination for those utilizing the City-wide system. InterneVIntranet This will foster communication between the Lifestyle Maintenance Organization (LMO) and the residents, as well as communication between the residents. Programs/Information that should be provided: Carpooling/ridesharing information. · Utilize the system to coordinate ridesharing efforts between the residents. Provide incentives for ridesharing. · Have a series of coordinators in the community (similar to a block captain for neighborhood watch). Have the coordinators meet regularly to foster communications and brainstorm to make the system better. Vanpools may be coordinated at this time. · Have regularly scheduled social events where potential rideshara candidates can meet each other. Make these fun and festive events. · Have incentives/parties (perhaps Friday social hour) for those that rideshare 3 or more times within a week. Schoolpooling Information. Similar to carpooling, but used for coordinating school-aged riders. Emphasis should be placed on trips to Day Middle School, Chaparral High School and Mt. San Jacinto College. Bike pooling. · Provide. · Maps of bike routes. · Dates and locations for: · Maintenance clinics. · Bike safety clinics. · Bikeclub meetings. · Use incentives like those provided for carpool/rideshare. Transit. · Utilize the GPS system that is being developed by RTA to make the shuttle system more efficient to the user. Wire homes with bells or lights to announce that the shuffle will be at the station in 5 minutes. Have interactive kiosks at the transit station and on-line that provides schedules for the shuttle. Bulletin Boards. These boards can be used for communication between Harveston residents and can be similar to the Community Bulletin Board on Adelphia (Channel 28) or that used at Ladera Ranch (www.laderaranch.com). The Bulletin Boards may identify services, social and employment opportunities, as well as other items that are lecated within Harveston that could reduce vehicle trips to other portions of the City. 3 · Potential applications include: · Clubs. · Organizations. · Babysitting. · Daycare (in-home). · In-home care. · Employment Opportunities. · Excursions. · Phone numbers and e-mail addresses for businesses that offer home and office deliveries. The cost to the business can be minimal. They can include coupons/discounts on-line or revenue can be used for other subsidies or incentives. · Commuter Services to employment areas outside of Temecula (i.e., San Diego, Los Angeles). Much of this information can be included in a monthly newsletter provided by the LMO. Uses Within the Villaqe Center By encouraging and focusing marketing efforts on certain types of uses within the Village Center, Citywide mobility is enhanced by reducing trips outside of the project. Potential uses to be rigorously recruited include: · Contract Postal Units. · Cafes. · Day Care. · Religious institutions. · Senior Housing. · Other convenience uses that keep trips within the project. · Specific Plan Section 11.4.5 (Mixed Use Overlay Zone) Permitted/Conditionally Permitted Uses Matrix. Public Education The benefits of these programs need to be expressed and understood by the public. · Benefits include: · Improved mobility. · Transportation options. · Health benefits (exercise). · Air Quality benefits. · Increased time for parents (no need to drive everywhere). · Increased opportunities for social interaction. · Decreased costs for transportation. · Potential options for education include: · Community newsletter. · Bulletin Board. · Local newspaper interest stories. · Schools. · Harveston walk/shuttle days (w/incentives). · Smart growth/livable communities example. 4 SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL WITH REGARD TO ITEM NO. 21 (HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN) © ' R)'~0 ~z-I ~PO TRACT NO. Z s~ s,~r 4 SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL WITH REGARD TO ITEM NO. 21 (HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN) 3 AN EXCERPT FROM THE JUNE 20, 2001 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES REGARDING AGENDA ITEM NO. 3 (THE HARVESTON PROJECT) Plannin.q Planninq Planninq Planninq Planninq Planninq Plannin.q Planning Planninq Application No. 99-0418- Harveston Specific Plan No. 13 Application No. 99-0418 - Development Code Amendment Application No. 99~0418 - Specific Plan Zoninq Standards Application Application Application Application Application Application No. 00-0189 - Harveston Environmental Impact Report No. 99-0245 - Chanqe of Zone No. 99-0446 - Development Aqreement No. 00-0295 - Tentative Tract Map No. 29639 No. 01-0030 - Tentative Tract Map No. 29928 No. 01-0031 - Tentative Tract Map No. 29929 Pianninq Application No. 01-0032 - Tentative Tract Map No. 30088 Patty Anders, Associate Planner/Saied Naaseh, Project Planner V/Dave Hoqan, Senior Planner/Debbie Ubnoske, Director of Plannin.q. Continued from May 16, 2001 and June 6, 2001. RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Adopt a Resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2001- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING CERTIFICATION OF THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT PREPARED FOR THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN AND RELATED ACTIONS AND RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS, AND A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM IN CONNECTION THEREWITH FOR THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED EAST OF INTERSTATE 15, NORTH OF SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK, WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD AND SOUTH OF THE CITY LIMIT (PLANNING APPLICATION 00-0189). 3.2 Adopt a resolution entitled; R: Excerpt\PCMin utes\06200 l\AgendaltemNo.3(Harveston) 1 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2001- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE THE FOLLOWING: 1) GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT FOR THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 00-0419); 2) THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 13 (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 99-0418); 3) ADOPT AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING STANDARDS (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 99-0418); 4) ADOPT AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING A CHANGE OF ZONE TO AMEND THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY (PLANNING APPLICATION 99-0245); AND 5) ADOPT AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING A CODE AMENDMENT TO SECTION 17.16.070 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 99-0418); ON PARCELS TOTALING APPROXIMATELY 550 ACRES LOCATED EAST OF INTERSTATE 15, NORTH OF SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK, WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD AND SOUTH OF THE NORTHERN CITY LIMIT, AND FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NOS. 910-261-001, 910-261-002, 910-110-013, 910-110- 015, 910-110-020, 910-110-021, 910-110-027, 910-110- 076, 910-100-007, 910-100-008, 910-060-009, 910-120- 005, 910-120-007, 910-120-008, 911-630-001, 911-630- 002, 911-630-003, 911-640-001, 911-640-002, 911-180- 002, 911-180-003, 911-180-004, 911-180-008, 911-180- 009, 911-180-015, 911-180-023, AN D 911-180-028; 3.3 Adopt a Resolution entitled: R:Excerpt\PCMinut es\06200 l~Agendaltem No.3(Harveston) 2 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2001-~ A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 00-0295 - TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 29639, THE SUBDIVISION OF APPROXIMATELY 550 ACRES INTO 91 LOTS WHICH CONFORM TO THE PLANNING AREAS, OPEN SPACE AREAS, SCHOOL AND PARK SITES OF THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN; PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 01-0030 - TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 29928, THE SUBDIVISION OF APPROXIMATELY 40 ACRES INTO 140 RESIDENTIAL LOTS AND 21 OPEN SPACE LOTS IN PLANNING AREA 7 OF THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN; PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 01-0031 - TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 29929, THE SUBDIVISION OF APPROXIMATELY 20 ACRES INTO 118 RESIDENTIAL LOTS AND 3 OPEN SPACE LOTS IN A PORTION OF PLANNING AREAS 3 AND 4 OF THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN; AND PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 01-0032 - TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 30088, THE SUBDIVISION OF APPROXIMATELY 9.18 ACRES INTO 38 RESIDENTIAL LOTS AND 8 OPEN SPACE LOTS IN A PORTION OF PLANNING AREA 4 OF THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN LOCATED EAST OF INTERSTATE 15, NORTH OF SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK, WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD AND SOUTH OF THE CITY LIMIT, AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NOS. 910-261,-001,910-261- 002, 910-110-013, 910-110-015, 910-110-020, 910-110- 021, 910-110-027, 910-110-076, 910-100-007, 910-100- 008, 910-060-009, 910-120-008, 911-630-001, 911-630- 002, 911-630-003, 911-640-001, 911-640-002, 911-180- 002, 911-180-003, 911-180-004, 911-180-008, 911-180- 009, 911-180-015, 911-180-023 AND 911-180-028. Noting the complexity involved with the matters associated with this project (i.e., issues related to the Conditions of Approval, and the Development Agreement) Assistant City Attorney Curley relayed that there were a few points yet to be resolved among the parties; advised that it has been requested that the Planning Commission commence this hearing, but take no final action regarding the applications, in order to allow staff and the applicant to continue efforts to resolve these matters; and in light of the Planning Commission's upcoming full agendas, queried whether the Commissioners would be available for a July 12, 2001 meeting scheduled solely for the purposed of addressing the Harveston project. In response, it was the consensus of the Planning Commission to take no final action regarding this item at this time, and to continue this matter to July 12, 2001. Addressing Commissioner Chiniaeff's queries regarding the Planning Commission's authority with respect to the Development Agreement (DA), Assistant City Attorney R:Excerpt\PCMinutes\062001~AgendaltemNo.3(Harveston) 3 Curley noted that when the DA was presented to the Planning Commission in its substantial form, the Planning Commission could make recommendations, and that if there was a consensus, the comments would be forwarded to City Council with the DA document for their consideration. Staff Reports Presented Via overheads, Associate Planner Anders presented the project plan (of record), highlighting the specific location, the adjacent properties, and the twelve (12) planning areas within the 550-acre site with eight (8) different land use classifications (i.e., four residential classifications, service commercial, park, school, and a mixed use overlay zone); provided an overview of the lake, and the lake park which was proposed at the heart of the community, comprising approximately 17.3 acres; noted the 307 acres of residential land with a variety of densities, the mixed use overlay zone (which included a Village Green), the 16.5-acre community park, the 13.8 acre Arroyo Park, the 12-acre elementary school (which is under construction at this time), and approximately 112 acres of service commercial area; specified that there were two out parcels that were not under the ownership of Lennar Communities; with respect to densities, relayed that this project proposes 1621 attached, detached, and clustered residential units, as well as 300 multi- family units (apartments) for a total of 1,921 units; specified the four different residential planning areas, noting the variances within each area with the largest lots located in the Iow medium (LM)density area which proposed 3.5 dwelling units per acre, with a minimum lot size of 4,000 square feet, and an average lot size of 5,000 square feet, whereas the smallest lots would be located in the medium density (MD) -2 zone, advising that the overall project density would be 3.4 units per acre, and the overall residential density would be 6.3; with respect to the Village Center concept which allows a mixed use component, relayed the applicant's efforts to achieve a live/work/play opportunity, as well as a variety of uses (i.e., retail, restaurant, office, daycare, workshop, and a private clubhouse), specifying that this area would allow a maximum of 20,000 square feet of commercial\retail, and 15,000 square feet for the Village Club, and included an additional 1.8 acre Village Green (which is an outdoor amphitheater); noted that this center would be pedestrian-oriented in terms of site design, architecture, signage, and walkways, and was strategically located adjacent to the high densities which would aid in the support of the commercial uses; with respect to the landscape plan which would provide 74 acres of open space/recreation area and comprised thirteen percent (13%) of the total acreage, noted the trails which would connect the service commercial area, the community park, the paseo, the lake park, through the Village Center, to the school, and to the exterior boundaries of the property, relaying the sidewalks located on both side of the loop road; noted that while the community park design was conceptual, the following elements would be included: four lighted baseball\softball fields, two full-size soccer field overlays, a large snack bar\restroom facility, and parking; relayed that the 13.8 acre Arroyo Park would be a re-creation of a riparian environment, planted with native California species; with respect to the architecture, specified that this particular Specific Plan has defined architectural forward elements requiring the homes to be built to these standards (i.e., 50% of the homes in the LM and the M-1 zoning classifications were required to be amhitecturally forward), noting the goal of the Specific Plan to have individual neighborhoods with their own design and character, comprised of no more than 50 homes, while maintaining continuity within the communities by linking the architecture, the landscaping, the colors, the walls, and the entry statements; provided an overview of the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) conducted for this site, noting that with respect to air quality, it was determined that a statement of overriding consideration was R:Excerpt\PCMinutes\06200 l~Agendaltem No.3(Harveston) 4 necessary; with respect to the two out parcels which are not owned by Lennar Communities, but are within the Specific Plan, noted that with the staff-initiated Zone Change and General Plan Amendment the parcels will have a land use designation and zoning of Low Medium (LM) Density residential, relaying that the 1.3-acre triangular portion will additionally be excluded from the Specific Plan due to its irregular shape and size, and will be re-zoned as Light Industrial (LI); and advised that the General Plan Amendment will reflect the Cherry Street alignment (per Caltrans' most recent direction). Presenting the details of the Development Agreement (DA), Project Planner Naaseh relayed following: that this document was the culmination of discussions between staff and the applicant, as well as input from the Subcommittee; that the two parties involved were Lennar Communities and Winchester Properties; that the term of the agreement would be ten years (with minor variances); that.via the DA, a new Community Facilities District (CFD) would be formed; that the applicant will receive Development Impact Fee (DIF) credits, and Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) credits, and the City will receive improvements in exchange for these credits; that the shuttle program was included in the DA (with a contribution up to $300,000), as well as the applicant's contributions for Fire equipment (in the amount of $150,000); advised that the interchange right-of-way dedication was a critical component of this agreement, noting that at this time Caltrans is in the process of developing a Project Study Report (PSR), which when approved will reveal the alignment of the interchange (which was expected to be approved in late 2001), clarifying that language has been added stating that if Caltrans has not approved this alignment by January of 2003, that the City Engineer will determine the alignment, and that prior to 2003 that there will be restrictions with respect to developing certain areas which may be used for the future alignment. For clarification, Assistant City Attorney Curley advised that since the DA document was a work in process at this point, that the final agreement may vary from the one presented at this time; and noted that the interchange issue would be addressed. Commissioner Chiniaeff recommended that there be a complete traffic circulation loop with Ynez Road going up to the Date Street area. In response, Deputy Director of Public Works Parks clarified that the alignment of Date Street and Ynez Road are not determinable until the alignment of the interchange is known, noting that the City is working with Caltrans regarding the determination of this alignment, reiterating that it was expected to be approved by the latter part of this year. Continuing his presentation regarding the Development Agreement (DA), Project Planner Naaseh noted the acceleration of numerous improvements, relaying that while at eleven (11 ) intersections the project's impacts would be less than 100%, the applicant has agreed to provide 100% of those improvements at their cost; noted that four (4) intersections will be improved prior to the Issuance of Building Permits; and relayed that the applicant would additionally be improving Margarita Road. In response to Commissioner Mathewson, Project Planner Naaseh relayed that staff was of the opinion that waiting until January of 2003 was an ample timeframe for Caltrans to make a determination regarding the interchange, reiterating that if at that point no decision has been made, the City Engineer would make a determination, making a specific area available for the interchange. Providing additional information, Assistant City Attorney Curley relayed that Caltrans has jurisdiction over the freeway corridor, noting that the surrounding properties would not be contingent upon Caltrans' plans, relaying the R:Excerpt~PCMinutes\062001~AgendaltemNo.3(Harveston) 5 cooperative efforts of this applicant. Further commenting regarding this issue, Deputy Director of Public Works Parks relayed the efforts of staff and the applicant via the Development Agreement to restrict the development in this area until a determination is made by Caltrans, providing additional information regarding the process if Caltrans did not make a determination by 2003, and then opted to not utilize the right-of-way selected by the City Engineer; and relayed that there has been, and would be, continuing discussions with Caltrans regarding this issue. Concluding her presentation, Associate Planner Anders provided additional specifications regarding the tract maps, highlighting the densities, the lot sizes, the rear access of various lots with architectural forward designs, the variety of site layouts, the open-ended cul-de-sacs, and the open space areas; and provided information regarding the Community Management Enhancement Plan, noting the goal to encourage the public to utilize the Harveston shuttle system, and thereby further reduce traffic impacts. For Commissioner Chiniaeff, Project Planner Naaseh specified the DIF credits the applicant would be receiving. In response to Commissioners Chiniaeff and Mathewson, Development Services Administrator McCarthy relayed that the applicant would be receiving fifty percent (50%) Quimby credit for the mini-parks, and would receive no DIF credits for these particular elements, one hundred percent (100%) Quimby credit for the community park, one hundred percent (100%) credit for four (4) acres of the Winchester Creek Park, fifty percent (50%) credit for the lake park, fifty percent (50%) credit for the Village Club, and fifty percent (50%) credit for the Village Green. Applicant's Presentation Mr. Bill Storm, representing Lennar Communities, provided an overview of the 1.5 year planning process with the City, including the numerous workshops presented to the Planning Commission, and the various entities' review which have been involved during this course; noted that Mr. Ray Becker would provide a PowerPoint presentation, and subsequently the applicant's representatives would be available for questions of the Planning Commission; advised that with this project would be a Lifestyle Management Organization (LMO) created to encourage a sense of community via various activities which was an important element due to Lennar Communities' goal to not just develop a project, but a community, and with this particular project, a community with diverse housing opportunities. Thanking staff for their efforts with respect to this project, Mr. Ray Becker, representing the applicant, provided a PowerPoint presentation, relaying the following information: The existing General Plan was compared to this particular proposal. The goal to create hometown character via a variety of architectural styles, neighborhood gathering places, open-ended cul-de-sacs, landscaped parkways, narrower streets, enhanced lighting and mailbox elements, and a Village Center core which was pedestrian-oriented. The proposed parkland and open space areas, providing a detailed overview of the lake, the outdoor amphitheater, the community park, the paseo park (which provided linkage), the loop road with extensive landscaping, and the Arroyo Park. R:Excerpt\PCMin utes\06200 l~Agendaltem No.3(Harveston) 6 The requirements for managed growth that this project addresses, detailing the agreement with the Temecula Valley Unified School District (TVUSD), the plethora of improvements completed via the CFD totaling a cost to the applicant in the amount of $14.4 million, and the additional infrastructure improvements the applicant has agreed to complete which are included in the DA at an additional cost of $22 miltion. The connectivity elements implemented in an effort to create cohesiveness. Addressing the comments of staff, Mr. Becker clarified that with respect to the overall Tentative Tract Map which was referenced as a financing map, that this was a full Tentative Map; concurred with Assistant City Attorney Curley's comments, advising that with the staff's continued cooperation, the applicant and staff will be able to work together to resolve the few disagreements; and with respect to the CFD, clarified that the CFD would not be financing all of the off-site improvements. Public is Invited to Provide Comments The following individuals spoke in opposition tothe project: Mr. Ed Burke Mr. Mark Broderick 30944 Wellington Circle 45501 Clubhouse Drive Representing Channell Commercial Corporation The above-mentioned individuals were not in favor of the project for the following reasons: The impacts of the project (i.e., buffering, the access to the proposed park) with respect to the facility backing the project (Channell Commercial Corporation) with no resolution at this point in time. The proposed zoning changes. Concerns regarding the alignment of Ynez Road. The significant impact related to traffic circulation, and air quality. The small lot sizes, and the high densities proposed. The General Plan use designation changes which circumvent the Growth Management Plan. The impact on water resources (i.e., the lake) in light of the shortages. Recommended that the intemhange be constructed Prior to Occupancy. For Mr. Burke, Chairman Guerriero noted that the Planning Commission had receipt of his written correspondence. In response to Mr. Broderick's comments, Commissioner Mathewson clarified that the applicant was receiving no credits for the lake element. The following individuals spoke as proponents of the project: Mr. John Dedovesh Ms. Jennifer Thurmond Mr. Rodolfo Martinez Ms. Pamela Voit 39450 Long Ridge Drive 39811 Knoltridge Drive 43714 Buckeye Road 43922 Carentau Drive R:Excerpt\PCMinutes\06200 l~Agendaltem No.3(Harveston) 7 The above-mentioned individuals were in favor of the project for the following reasons: The project is well-planned and family-oriented, and would be beneficial to the City. The negative traffic impacts are primarily due to the impacts from the County development. Delighted with the new school, the project concept with the pedestrian links which creates a sense of community and permanence, the lighted fields, the parks, the lake, and the innovative architecture. The need for diversity and growth, and the well-organized cultural activity enhancements which this plan addresses. Commended the developer for going above and beyond the requirements. This project would bring new amenities to the City which will enhance the community. The traffic solutions offered (i.e., transit opportunities). The LMO which was a wonderful concept aiding in fostering a sense of community. The commercial area which would address various needs of the project residents, thereby reducing traffic. Mr. Jim Miller, representing the City of Murrieta, clarified that he was not opposed to the project; relayed that he had distributed a letter with attached exhibits to the Planning Commission and staff, detailing the concerns of the City of Murrieta; with respect to the Cherry Street Interchange project, noted that per discussions with Caltrans, it appeared that an alignment determination would soon be decided, relaying that Caltrans desired a joint resolution between the Cities of Temecula and Murrieta, endorsing the alignment, which has not yet occurred; and due to the freeway improvements necessary to meet the projected growth, recommended that this project not be exempt from TUMF. At 8:28 P.M. the meeting recessed, reconvening at 8:37 P.M. Commission Closin.q Comments In light of the fact that this item was being continued, Commissioner Chiniaeff advised that he would postpone his comments until additional information was received. Noting that there were some minor issues regarding the Specific Plan that he desired to have addressed at the July 12, 2001 meeting, Commissioner Mathewson relayed the following; With respect to the overall density, recommended that the applicant consider revising the densities in the northern property area where currently that are two (2) M-1 designations, recommending that this are be modified to reflect LM designations. With respect to the out parcels and the 1.5 acre parcel, and the adjacent property owner's desire that this area not be a park area, but maintain an LM residential designation, recommended that there be consideration to incorporate this into the community park. With respect to the Quimby requirements, noted his satisfaction that the applicant has gone beyond the requirements, providing additional open space and recreational opportunities throughout the project. With respect to the lake use, acknowledged the liability concerns, recommending that there be consideration for the lake to be open to the public, requesting the P~anning Commission for input. R:Excerpt\PCMinutes\062001~AgendaJternNo.3(Haweston) 8 In response, Chairman Guerriero relayed a desire for clarification regarding the rationale for the lake use not being open to the public. For the Planning Commission, Mr. Storm noted that at this point in time, there are no insurance carriers willing to insure the facility if it is publicly used, relaying that in researching this issue with respect to other lake uses, that there were no lakes allowing public use of the water sur[ace area; provided additional information regarding staff's concerns regarding opening the lake use up to the public; and for Chairman Guerriero, clarified that the area surrounding the lake would be open to the public, and was conditioned as such. Addressing Commissioner Mathewson's queries, Mr. Becker advised that the applicant was making efforts to allow the public to fish on the lake, confirming that the Menifee Lake was restricted to HCA use only; provided additional information regarding the risks associated with public use, reiterating the research conducted regarding every community lake in southern California; clarified the difference from a liability perspective regarding granting the public use of the lake; and for Commissioner Chiniaeff, relayed that the lake would not be fenced. In response to the Planning Commission, Director of Community Services Parker noted that staff would provide additional information regarding the restrictions related to public use of the lake. Commissioner Chiniaeff noted that if a lake was to be publicly used, it would need to be a larger facility, advising that in his opinion, this pariicular lake should be exclusively utilized by the homeowners. Chairman Guerriero noted that if the lake was not open to the public, it would not meet the criteria qualifying as a public amenity. Continuing his comments, Commissioner Mathewson relayed the following; That he was enthusiastic with the project, noting concern regarding whether the proposal presented would actually be implemented into the project, recommending that the Design Guidelines, the Conditions of Approval, and the DA have standards that aid in ensuring that the presented concepts are actually developed. In response to Chairman Guerriero's queries regarding the landscape buffer along the 1- 15 freeway, referencing the agenda material Associate Planner Anders advised that this issue has been addressed, noting the requirement that the elevation facing the 1-15 freeway would be required to have equal architectural detail as the main elevation, clarifying that this view would not be compromised, additionally noting the 50-foot landscape setback requirements. For Commissioner Mathewson, Mr. Bob Davis, traffic engineer representing the applicant, provided additional information regarding the Institute of Traffic Engineer's (ITE's) recommended procedures, which indicated that the regression equation methodology be utilized due to the certain factors that exist, detailing the data points utilized; provided assurance, that in his opinion, the numbers used for this study were appropriate, noting that additional discounts have not been factored in for reduction for transit, or internal R:Excerpt\PCMinutes\06200 l~Agendaltem No.3(Harveston) 9 trips; and with respect to the rates utilized for the service commercial area, relayed the composite rate utilized which resulted in a slightly lower trip generation for the PM peaks, and provided a higher trip generation for the AM peaks. Concluding his comments, Commissioner Mathewson relayed the following: With respect to school funding for the expansion needs for James Day Middle School, and Chaparral High School, and the recent significant shortfall with respect to State funding, requested that the applicant provide additional information regarding these particular issues at the July 12th meeting. Director of Planning Ubnoske requested the Planning Commission to provide any additional questions to staff as soon as possible in order for the remarks to then be forwarded to the applicant, and so the issues could to be addressed at the July 12, 2001 meeting. in response to Director of Planning Ubnoske, Commissioners Chiniaeff and Guerriero relayed that it would be their desire that the applicant consider modifying the Design Guidelines, and include language in the Specific Plan in order to address enhancing the commercial area, in lieu of referring back to the Development Code standards. MOTION: Commissioner Chiniaeff moved to continue this item to the July 12th Planning Commission meeting. Commissioner Mathewson seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. Chairman Guerriero relayed thanks to all the residents who expressed their comments regarding the project, additionally expressing gratitude to staff for a job well done with respect to this particular proposal. R:Excerpt\PCMinutes\06200 l~Agendaltem No.3(Harveston) 10 ITEM 22 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANCF_~.,_,~ CitY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Mayor and Members of the City Council City Manager Jim O'Grady, Assistant City Manager July 24, 2001 Compensation for Commission Members - Requested by Mayor Pro Tern Roberts RECOMMENDATION: Consider amending Section 2.40.100 of the City's Municipal Code to provide compensation to Commission Members on a per-meeting basis and provide direction to Staff. BACKGROUND: The City's Municipal Code currently provides the following compensation amounts: Planning Commission - Public Safety/Traffic Commission - Community Services Commission - $100 per month $ 50 per month $ 50 per month Mayor Pro Tern Roberts has requested that the City Council consider compensation for the Commission members based on payment of $50 per noticed meeting attended. FISCAL IMPACT: Possible minor fiscal impact if Commissions increase their meeting frequency (currently typically two times per month for Planning Commission, one time per month for Community Services and Public Safety/Traffic Commission). R:IOGRADYJIAGENDA REPORT- COMPENSATION FOR COMMISSIONERS, JUL Y 24, 2001,D0C I 7/18/01 ITEM 23 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANzC~.~,.... CITY MANAGER .~ - CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Grant Yates, Assistant to the CityManager July 24, 2001 Appointment of an Animal Shelter Subcommittee-requested Councilmember Naggar by PREPARED BY: Aaron Adams, Sr. Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council consider the appointment of a subcommittee to review the Animal Friends of the Valley proposed new shelter. BACKGROUND: The City of Temecula has enjoyed a long and productive working relationship with Animal Friends of the Valley, formerly called L.E.A.F. The animal control services they provide to our citizens have been very good to date and this new facility is greatly needed to support Southwest Riverside County's needs now and into the future. The conditional use permit for this facility was approved by the Riverside County Board of Supervisors at their July 17, 2001 meeting. If established by the City Council, the role of this committee would be to provide input and work with the Animal Friends of the Valley as they prepare to construct their new facility. FISCAL IMPACT: None at this time. DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OFTEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City ManagedCity Council APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANC~ CITY MANAGER William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer July 24, 2001 Department of Public Works Monthly Activity Report RECOMMENDATION: Attached for City Council's review and filing is the Department of Public Works' Monthly Activity Reports for the month of June, 2001. MOACTRPT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS Monthly Activity Report June / July 2001 Prepared By: Steve Beswick Checked by: Amer Attar Submitted by: William G. Hughes Date: July 24, 2001 PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION 1. First Street Bridge This project will construct First Street from Pujol Street to Old Town Front Street, including the construction of a bridge over Murrieta Creek and the realignment of Santiago Road. Contractor has finished the final punch list items on the street portion of the work. Construction of the EMWD lift station continues. 2. Old Town Parking Lot This project will rehabilitate the Stampede parking lot. It includes resurfacing, landscaping, and Old Town Series lights. Construction of the project is complete. Notice of Completion is scheduled for the July 24 Council meeting. 3. Pala Road Bridge Environmental Restoration/Median and Parkway Landscape Improvements The project installed landscape improvements along Pala Road and Cupeno Lane and restored the wetlands in the construction zone. It included the installation o£an irrigation system, planting, and hydroseeding. Median and parkway work is complete. Plant establishment period and 5-year maintenance began in June. 4. Pala Road Soundwalls Work on this project includes the construction of masonry block soundwalls on Pala Road from west of Rainbow Canyon Road to east of Club House Drive. The wall averages 14' in height. The sound wall is complete. Plant Establishment Period will end in July. 5. Murrieta Creek Crossing Between Winchester and Rancho California Road- Low.flow Crossing at Via Montezuma This project will construct a low-flow crossing of Murdeta Creek connecting Diaz and Del Rio at Via Montezuma. In addition, this project will rehabilitate the street of Via Montezuma. This project is complete. The road was opened to thru traffic on Friday, June 15,2001. Recording a conservation easement is in progress for the mitigation of the disturbed area. 6. City Maintenance Facility Alterations, Phase IH This project will modify the existing two story masonry block building to accommodate a new second floor of office space over the existing two-story maintenance bay, including the installation of an elevator, and two new second floor restrooms. Framing has begun and will continue. Progress is being made on the interior improvements and the new single story addition. R:\MonthlyActivityReport\CIP\2001 ~lune.doc 7. Margarita Road Widening, Pauba Road to Dartolo Road This project will widen Margarita Road from Pio Pico to Dartolo Road and re-landscape the medians from De Portola to SR 79 South. Included with this project is the pavement rehabilitation of Phase H (Pauba Road to Pio Pico. The contractor started work on 4/30/01 and has completed the first of three phases. The traffic has been shifted to thc west side of Margarita Road. The construction portion of the project is expected to bc completed in October and the plant maintenance period completed by the end of this year. 8. Rancho California Sports Park Culvert Modification In this project, the existing culvert will need to be modified to eliminate a slope erosion problem. Construction of the project is complete with a 90-day landscape maintenance period with minor slope modification remaining. 9. Traffic Signal installation at Stonewood and Margarita A traffic signal will be installed at the intersection of Margarita Road and Stonewood Drive. City Council awarded the construction contract to DBX, Inc. on April 10, 2001, in the mount of $132,000. A pre- construction meeting was held on Mayl0. The poles for this project are expected to be delivered in July. Installation will start at that time and it will be done in August. 10. Light Emitting Diode (LED) Traffic Signal Conversion Program A grant award in thc amount of $140,870.00 was obtained to replace incandescent traffic signal lamps with Light Emitting Diode (LED) lamps. Under this program, all traffic signal lamps in thc City of Temecula will bc replaced with thc energy efficient, long lasting LED units. All LED units (City's and Caltrans' intersections) were installed prior to the California Energy Commission deadline of June 1,2001. Thc project is complete and will he accepted by City Council at thc August 14, 2001 meeting. I1. Pavement Management System, Jefferson Avenue This project will rehabilitate Jefferson Avenue from the northerly City limits to Overland Drive. The contractor has completed the first phase and Phase 2, and shifted the traffic to the west side of Jefferson Avenue both north and south of the intersection of Winchester Road. The work is expected to be completed by the end of July. 12. Senior Center Expansion The expansion will include an addition of 3000 square feet to the existing building. The expansion will be for recreational, office, and meeting purposes. A contract was awarded to R. Moody Construction on June 26. A pre-construction will be held on July 18. Construction is anticipated to begin by July 30. Expansion will include the addition of 3000 square feet of building area fro recreational, office and meeting purposes. 13. Pavement Management System - Citywide This project will involve rehabilitating the pavement of various streets in the City for FY 2000-01. McLaughlin Engn and Mining Corp. was awarded a contract at the June 26 Council meeting. Once the traffic control plans are approved and construction permit is issued, construction will begin. Construction is scheduled to begin on July 23. 2 R:\MonthlyAefivityRepor t\CIP\2001Uune.doc 14. AC Street Repairs - FY2001 This project will rehabilitate and reconstruct selected City streets. Cunningham Davis was awarded the contract at the June 26 Council meeting. Once the traffic control plans are approved and construction permit is issued, construction will begin. Construction is scheduled to begin July 23. 15. Chaparral High School Swimming Pool A 25-yard x 25-meter pool will be built at Chaparral High School. The facility will include a smaller recreation pool component and a bathhouse with locker room facilities, restronms and showers. Spray-type play equipment will be included as an element in the base construction bid. On July 10, Council awarded a construction contract to California Commercial Pools for the bid amount of $2,370,147.17. City met with TVUSD and their contractor, and DSA to coordinate efforts. A Pre-Construction meeting is scheduled for July 24, 2001. 16. Starlight Ridge Southern Cross Road Sidewalk Project This Project will install approximately one half mile of sidewalk along the northwest side of Southern Cross Road. Final design is complete. Elite Bobcat Service, Inc. is the apparent low bidder and thc project will be awarded at the July 24 Council meeting. Construction will begin in the month of August. 17. Street Name Sign Replacement This project will entail removing the existing wooden signs in the La Serena area and replacing them with plastic signs selected by the Public Traffic Safety Commission. The signs have been purchased and City forces will start installing the new signs shortly. PROJECTS BEING ADVERTISED FOR BIDS NONE PROJECTS IN DESIGN 1. Pala Road Improvements - Phase H (79 South to Pechanga Road) This project will widen Pala Road to its ultimate width from the Pala Road Bridge to Pechanga road. Plan check comments (70% Submittal) were returned to the consultant. Work is proceeding on the remainder of the design. The approval of Wolf Creek Drainage Basin Study by RCFC & WCD has been delayed because hydrology studies upstream of Wolf Creek require prior approval from RCFC & WCD. Staff will be using an appraiser to assist in the preparation of the real estate appraisal report. The project is funded for design only at this time. 2. Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Over Murrieta Creek This project will widen Rancho California Bridge over Murrieta Creek to provide four additional traffic 3 R:\MonthlyAcfivityReport\CIP\2001 ~June.doc lanes. 90% drawings are scheduled for submittal and review by staff at the end of July. 3. Temecula Library A full service library, approximately 34,000 square feet in area, will be designed and built on Pauba Road, just west of Fire Station//84. This project will provide the community with library resources and services. The design is progressing on schedule. Utility services construction is being coordinated with Pauba Road, Phase II project. Comments on the plans by City staff were returned to the consultant. The architect is working on the final drawings. 4. Pauba Road Improvements - Phase II (Margarita Road to Showalter Road) This project will widen Pauba Road from Showalter to just west of Margarita Road to its ultimate width. The project is in design and the work is being coordinated with design of the library project. All utility issues are being addressed. 90% design plans were submitted to the City for review. Plans and specs were reviewed by staff and will be returned to Consultant for completion of final design plans. 5. Murrieta Creek Bridge - Overland Drive Extension to Diaz This project will entail alignment studies and the design of an extension of Overland Drive, westerly to Diaz Road, which includes a new bridge over Murrieta Creek. The project includes the widening of Overland Drive from Jefferson Avenue to Commerce Center Drive, and the extension of Overland Drive across Mtwheta Creek to Diaz Road. Project Design Consultant (PDC), the designer, will submit the alignment study the week of July 16, 2001. 6. 1-15 Northbound On-Ramp Widening at Winchester R~ad This project will re-stripe westbound Winchester Road from Ynez Road to I-15 northbound on-ramp to allow for a better flow of traffic. The City applied for an Encroaetunent Permit from Caltrans to do the striping and comments were received. The consultant is addressing Caltrans comments. Plans will be resubmitted to Caltrans the week of July 16. 7. New Temecula Sports Complex A new 40+ Acres sports complex will be built on Pala Road at Wolf Valley. On May 22, 2001, a meeting was held to review the preliminary design resulting fromthe Workshop. Staffgave additional input during this meeting. A soils report was completed and forwarded to the City. The consultant, RJM Design is finishing up the preliminary master plan of the sports complex. Staff visited other parks in southern California. g. Diaz Road Realignment Under this project, Diaz Road will be realigned to Vincent Moraga Road at Rancho California Road. Business Park Drive will be a T-intersection at Diaz. In response to additional design cost requests by the designer, City staff has elected to complete the design in-house. Anticipated design completion is scheduled for September 2001. 9. Rancho California Road Median Modifications at Town Center The project will include the closing of the two median openings on Rancho California Road in front of the Town Center, while lengthening the left turn lanes at Ynez Road, Town Center Drive, and Via Los Colinas to improve traffic circulation. The design is 90% complete with the exception of the landscaping. Landscaping 4 R:\MonthlyActivityReport\ClPk2001Uune.doc design is currently at 30% completion. 10. Rancho California Road Widening at Ynez Road (Add right turn lane to westbound lanes) This project will add a right turn lane on westbound Rancho California Road at Yncz Road. Right of way acquisition at the northeast corner of Rancho California and Ynez will be required. In-house design is 90% complete. 11. Margarita Road/Winchester Road Intersection Improvements Under this project, an additional left turn from eastbound Winchester to northbound Margarita will be added in order to accommodate increasing traffic volumes. Design is 50% complete. Project will be processed as a Caltrans Encroachment Permit. 12. Landscaping and Sidewalk On 79 South (Front Street to Pala Road) The project consists of the design and construction of new sidewalk, landscaping, and irrigation along the south side of State Highway 79 South between Pala Road and Old Town Front Street. A design consultant has been selected and a contract will be awarded at the July 24 Council meeting. The design will begin in the month of August. 13. Alignment Study for Murrieta Creek Bridge Between Winchester Road and Temecula's City Limits and Diaz Road Extension This study will determine the alignment and location of the Mumeta Creek crossing between Winchester Road to the northern City Limits. In addition, the study will be combined with the Diaz Road Extension alignment study and design. Coordination with the City of Murrieta, Flood Control and Army Corps of Engineers is necessary. Staffawarded the contract to Kimley-Horn and Associates on March 27, 2001 council meeting. The study is currently underway. PROJECTS THAT ARE SUSPENDED OR ON-HOLD 1. Pujol Street Sidewalk Improvements - Phase H This project will complete the knuckle at the intersection of Sixth Street and Felix Valdez. The project is on hold. 2. Winchester Road Widening Between Enterprise Circle nd Jefferson This project will add a right turn lane from Eastbound Winchester to Southbound Jefferson, starting at Enterprise Circle. O'Mallcy Engineering Corporation has provided the design survey data. Project is on hold. 3. Traffic Signals Design at Pala Road and Loma Linda, and at Pala Road and Wolf Valley Two new traffic signals will be installed on Pala Road, one at Loma Linda and the other at WolffValley. The plans and specifications are complete. The project is being coordinated with Pechanga Development Corporation sewer project. This project is on hold due to environmental constraints. 5 R:\MonthlyActivityRcport\ClPk2001Uune.doc 4. Pala Road Interim Improvements - (Widening to accommodate four lanes from Loma Linda Bridge to Wolf Valley) Pala Road Interim Improvements (58 feet in width) will be completed with the second phase of construction of the Pala Road Trunk Sewer (Pechanga Development Corporation project). An encroachment permit was issued for the construction of the trunk sewer and the interim street improvements. Traffic signal and striping plans are complete. The construction of Pala Road Trunk Sewer (Phase Two) by the Pechanga Development Corporation from Clubhouse Drive to the new Pechanga Casino Driveway (600 feet southeast of Wolf Valley Road) started November 6, 2000 and the approximate completion date is Spring 2001. The interim project is on hold due to environmental constraints. 5. Santa Gertrudis Bridge Widening at 1-15 This is Phase II of the Southbound Auxiliary Lane project at the southbound exit ramp for Winchester Road. This project will xviden the 1-15 southbound exit-ramp at the Santa Gertrudis Creek Bridge to provide an additional lane on the exit ramp just north of Winchester Road. Staff is revisiting the merits of this project in light of the proposed Project Study Report for Cherry Street Interchange. The study shows that this bridge may have to be removed in the future to accommodate the Cherry Street Interchange. This project is suspended indefinitely. 6. Santiago Road/Ynez Road Intersection Improvements This project will widen, realign, and adjust the traffic signal timing of the existing intersection. This project has been delayed indefinitely. The Traffic Division completed some minor striping and signal adjustments that improved traffic movement through the intersection. 6 R:\MonthlyActivityRepor t\ClP\2001 ~June ,doc LLI I-- Z UJ 0 13. --I O. TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: MEMORANDUM Bill Hughes, Director of Public WorkdCity Engineer Brad Buron, Maintenance Superintendent July 2, 2001 Monthly Activity Report - June, 2001 The following activities were performed by Public Works Department, Street Maintenance Division in-house personnel for the month of June, 2001: I. SIGNS A. Total signs replaced 222 B. Total signs installed 7 C. Total signs repaired 5 II. TREES A. Total trees tdmmed for sight distance and street sweeping concerns II1. ASPHALT REPAIRS A. Total square feet of A. C. repairs B. Total Tons 2,738 44 IV. CATCH BASINS A. Total catch basins cleaned 3 RIGHT-OF-WAY WEED ABATEMENT A. Total square footage for right-of-way abatement 45,710 VI. GRAFFITI REMOVAL A. Total locations B. Total S.F. 7 270 VII. STENCILING A. 430 New and repainted legends B. 7,721 L.F. of new and repainted red curb and striping Also, City Maintenance staff responded to 35 service order requests ranging from weed abatement, tree trimming, sign repair, A.C. failures, litter removal, and catch basin cleanings. This is compared to 3._~9 service order requests for the month of May~ 2001. The Maintenance Crew has also put in 109 hours of overtime which includes standby time, special events and response to street emergencies. The total cost for Street Maintenance performed by Contractors for the month of June~ 2001 was $ 8~708.00 compared to $ 45~355.00 for the month of May~ 2001. Account No. 5402 $ 4,208.00 Account No. 5401 $ 4,500.00 Account No. 999-5402 $ - 0 - Ron Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works Ali Moghadam, Senior Engineer- (CIP/Traffic) Greg Butler, Senior Engineer (Capital Improvements) Amer Attar, Senior Engineer (Capital Improvements) Jerry Alegria, Senior Engineer - (Land Development) STREET MAINTENANCE CONTRACTORS The following contractors have performed the following projects for the month of June, 2001 DATE DESCRIPTION TOTAL COST ACCOUNT STREET/CHANNEL/BRIDGE OF WORK SIZE CONTRACTOR: MONTELEONE EXCAVATING Date: 06/13/01 OLDTOWN WASHING OF STREETS FOR STREET PAINTING FESTIVAL # 5402 TOTAL COST $ 508.00 Date: 06/15/01 PAUBA & MARGARITA REMOVAL OF SILT & DEBRIS FROM DESILTING PONDS DES1LTING PONDS # 5401 TOTAL COST $ 4,500.00 cOI~YI'RACTOR: RENE'S COMMERCIAL MANAGEMENT R.O.W. WEED ABATEMENT AND TRASH Date: 06/11/01 CITY'WIDE PICK-UP # 5402 TOTAL COST $ :},700.00 Dat~: TOTAL COST TOTAL COST ACCOUNT /~401 $ 4500.00 TOTAL COST ACCOUNT #5402 $ 4208.00 TOTAL COST ACCOUNT g99-5402 -0- CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DMSION STENCILS / STRIPING MONTH OF JUNE, 2001 DATE LOCATION WORK COMPLETED 06/04/01 AREAS 3 & 4 REPAINTED 3,686 L.F. RED CURB 06/05/01 AREA g4 REPAINTED 3,945 L.F. RED CURB 06/12/01 DIAZ AT BLACK DEER LOOP INSTALLED 90 L.F. DETAIL 32 06/19~)1 AREA #I REPA1NTED 47 LEGENDS 06/20/01 VIA PUESTA DEL SOL INSTALLED 4 LEGENDS 06/21/01 AREAS #l & #2 REPAllN'I PSD 35 LEGENDS 06/22/01 AREAS #1 & #2 REPAINTED 40 LEGENDS 06/25/01 AREAS #1 & #2 REPAINTED 34 LEGENDS 06/26/01 OLD TOWN REPAINTED 192 LEGENDS 06/27/01 OLD TOWN AND AREA #1 REPAINTED 70 LEGENDS 06/28/01 WINCHESTER AT YNEZ REPAIiN I'ED 8 LEGENDS TOTAL NEW & REPAINTED LEGENDS 430 NEW & REPAINTED RED CURB & STRIPING L~F. 7~721 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DMSION GRAFFITI REMOVAL MONTH OF JUNE, 2001 DATE LOCATION WORK COMPLETED 06/13/01 MARGARITA AT MEADOWS REMOVED 38 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 06/14/01 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT CALLE TAJO REMOVED 160 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 06/18/01 MARGARITA AT MORAGA REMOVED 26 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 06/18/01 RAINBOW CANYON ROAD REMOVED 24 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 06/19/01 MARGARITA AT DE PORTOLA REMOVED 6 S.F, OF GRAFFITI 06/21/01 28501 PUJOL REMOVED 8 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 06/29/01 FRONT AT 19TM HOLE GOLF CARTS REMOVED 8 S.F. OF GRAFFITI TOTAL S.F. GRAFFITI REMOVED 270 TOTAL LOCATIONS 7 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DMSION CATCH BASIN MAINTENANCE MONTH OF JUNE, 2001 DATE LOCATION WORK COMPLETED 06/18/01 30235 CUPEI~O LANE CLEANED & CHECKED 2 CATCH BASINS 06/29/01 FRONT AT MORENO CLEANED & CHECKED 1 CATCH BASINS TOTAL CATCH BASINS CLEANED & CHECKED ~ CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DMSION RIGHT-OF-WAY TREE TRIMMING MONTH OF JUNE, 2001 DATE LOCATION WORK COMPLETED 06/05/01 LEENA AT VIA RAZO TRIMMED 2 R.O.W. TREES 06/05f01 AMARITA WAY SOUTH OF VIA RAYA TRIMMED 2 R.O.W. TREES 06/12~31 42328 CORTE VILLOSA TRIMMED 2 R.O.W. TREES 06/1551 29788 NIGHT VIEW COURT TRIMMED 2 R.O.W. TREES 06/27~1 PAUBA EAST OF YNEZ TRIMMED 10 R.O.W. TREES 06/28/01 PAUBA EAST OF YNEZ TRIMMED 21 R.O.W. TREES 06/29/01 YNEZ AT PREECE TRIMMED 6 R.O.W. TREES TOTAL ILO.W. TREES TR1MM~D 45 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION SERVICE ORDER REQUEST LOG MONTH OF JUNE, 2001 DATE LOCATION REQUEST DATE WORK RECEIVED COMPLETED 06/01/01 41320 SALT RIVER COURT T.C. CONCERN 06/01/01 06/01/01 30876 BARDMOORE DRIVE TREE TR1MM]]qG 06/01/01 06/04/01 VIA RIO AT ASBURY PLACE TREE TRIMMING 06/04/01 06/04/01 43856 GATEWOOD WAY REMOTE CAR 1N DRAIN 06/04/01 06/04/01 41985 NIBLICK ROAD SLURRY SEAL 06/04/01 06/04/01 WINCHESTER AT MARGARITA TREE TRIM3.,ffNG 06/04/01 06/05/01 MARGARITA AT AVENIDA BARCA BATI'ERY IN STREET 06/06/01 06/06/01 42258 AGENA SPRINKLER REPAIR 06/06/01 06/08/01 DIAZ AT VIA MONTEZUMA S.N.S. WRONG 06/08/01 06/11/01 31577 CORTE SALINAS STORM DRA1N CONCERN 06/11/01 06/11/01 31448 CORTE MONT1EL OIL SPOT 1N STREET 06/11/01 06/11/01 ViA ARIAS AT VIA JUMILLA DIRT IN STREET 06/11/01 06/12/01 32369 CERCLE BEAUREGARD DUCKS IN STORM DRAIM 06/12/01 06/13/01 27941 CALLE PALMS POLES IN YARD 06/13/01 06/13/01 41419 RUE JADOT SKATE BOARD IN DRAIN 06/13/01 06/15/01 29788 NIGHTVIEW CIRCLE TREE TRANCH DOWN 06/15/01 06/15/01 31669 PASEO DE LAS OLAS DISEASED TREE 06/15/01 06/15/01 43104 PUDDING COURT HOLE IN SIDEWALK 06/15/01 06/15/01 COSTCO AT OVERLAND STREET DEPRESSIONS 06/15/0 ! 06/15/01 31055 CORTE ANACOPA ROOT PRUNING 06/15/01 06/19/01 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD DEBRIS PICK-UP 06/19/01 06/20/01 RANCHO CALIF. RD, AT BUT'I ERFIELD STAGE POTHOLE 06/20/01 06/20/01 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT ASTEROID POTHOLE 06/20/01 DATE LOCATION REQUEST DATE WORK RECEIVED COMPLETED 06/20/01 190'1 CAM[NO VIDA ROBLE MUD IN STORM DRAIN 06/20/01 06/21/01 42221 MAIN STREET DOWN TREE 06/21/01 06/21/01 RANCHO CALIF. RD. AT BUTTERFIELD STAGE POTHOLE 06/21/01 06/22/01 42088 RIO NEDO CHANNEL CLEANING 06/22/01 06/25/01 30540 MILKY WAY DRIVE BUGS 1N TREES 06/25/01 06/25~)1 45385 PIUTE STREET RAISED SIDEWALK 06/25/01 06/26/01 32179 CALLE AVELLA REVERSED S.NS. 06/26/01 06/26/01 31016 CAM]NO DEL ESTE STORM DRAIN CLEANING 06/26/01 06/26/01 44972 MU1RFIELD CHANNEL GATE OPEN 06/26/01 06/26/01 42072 PASEO SONRISA MONUMENT SIGN DOWN 06/26/01 06/26/01 40206 HOLDEN CIRCLE CHANNEL GATE BROKEN 06/26/01 06/28/01 29962 SANTIAGO ROAD SLURRY QUESTION 06/28/01 TOTAL SERVICE ORDER REQUESTS 35 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DMSION RIGHT-OF-WAY WEED ABATEMENT MONTH OF JUNE, 2001 DATE LOCATION WORK COMPLETED 06/14/01 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT DIAZ ABATED 1,325 S.F. R.O.W. WEEDS 06/14/01 OVERLJkND AT JEI~I"ERSON ABATED 4,200 S.F. R.O.W. WEEDS 06114101 MARGARITA BETWEEN SAN FERMIN AND PIO PICO ABATED 15,000 S.F.R.O.W. WEEDS 06/15/01 MARGARITA BETWEEN SAN FERMIN AND PIO PICO ABAI'ED 8,400 S.F. R.O.W. WEEDS 06/15/01 DEL RIO ABATED 1,560 S.F.R.O.W. WEEDS 06t2501 RANCHO VISTA EAST OF YNEZ ABATED 100 S.F.R.O.W. WEEDS 06/27/01 RANCHO VISTA EAST OF YNEZ ABATED 800 S.F.R.O.W. WEEDS 06/27/01 PAUBA EAST OF YNEZ ABATED 125 S.F.R.O.W. WEEDS 06/28/01 PAUBA EAST OF YNEZ ABATED 2,200 S.F.R.O.W. WEEDS 06/29/01 YNEZ AT PREECE ABATED 8,000 S.F.R.O.W. WEEDS 06/29/01 RANCHO VISTA EAST OF YNEZ ABATED 4,000 S.F.R.O.W. WEEDS TOTAL S.F.R.-O-W WEEDS ABATED 45~710 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION ASPHALT (POTHOLES) REPAIRS MONTH OF JUNE, 2001 DATE LOCATION SCOPE OF WORK S.F. TOTAL TONS 06/04~1 PALA AT LOMALINDA REPAIR POTHOLES 12 TEMP A.C. 06/04/01 RANCHO VISTA EAST OF YNEZ R&R A.C. 120 4 06,q)5/01 RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD. W/O MEADOWS PARKWAY R & R A.C. 261 2.5 06/06/01 RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD. W/O MEADOWS PARKWAY R & R A.C. 70 1.5 06/07/01 RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD. W/O MEADOWS PARKWAY A.C. OVERLAY 211 2.5 06/18/01 RANCHO VISTA ROAD EAST OF TVHS R & R A.C. 105 2.5 06/19/01 RANCHO VISTA ROAD EAST OF TVHS R&R A.C. 274 6.5 06/20,'~ 1 RANCHO VISTA ROAD EAST OF TVHS R & R A.C. 240 6.5 06/21/01 5TM STREET EAST OF FRONT STREET R & R A.C. 152 4 06/25/01 MORENO AT FRONT STREET R&R A.C. 176 6 06/26/01 41975 4TM STREET A.C. OVERLAY 637 5 06/28/01 2?m STREET, 3va) STREET & 5TM STREET A.C. OVERLAY 480 3 TOTAL S.F. OF REPAIRS 2~738 TOTAL TONS 44 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DMSION SIGNS MONTH OF JUNE, 2001 DATE LOCATION WORK COMPLETED 0604/01 AMARITA AT PIO PICO REPLACED R-1 "FADED" 06/04/01 AREA #3 REPLACED 31 STREET NAME SIGNS )6/05/01 SANTIAGO EAST OF YNEZ REPLACED W-41 06/05/01 VIA RAZO AT LEENA WAY REPLACED R-1 "FADED" 06/05/01 MONTELEGRO AT CALLE BALL ENTINE REPLACED R-1 "FADED" 06105101 AREA #3 REPLACED 21 S.N.S. 06/06/01 VIA MEJA AT CAMINO HERENCIA REPLACED R- 1 "FADED" 06/06/01 AREA #3 REPLACED 12 S.N.S. 06/07/01 VIA ROSAS AT CORTE BENITEZ REPLACED R-1 "FADED" 06/07/01 CORTE CARDIN AT CORTE AL~ REPLACED R-1 "FADED" 06/07/01 AREA #3 REPLACED 44 S.N.S. 06/08/01 AREA #3 REPLACED 6 S.N.S. 06/11/01 AREA #3 REPLACED 24 S.N.S. 06/11/01 AMARITA WAY AT VIA CEJA REPLACED R-1 FADED 06/11/01 PAUBAAT V]ADEANDA REPLACED R-1 FADED 06/11/01 VIA DEANDA AT CORTE CARMONA REPLACED R-1 FADED 06/12/01 RANCHO VISTA AT CAMINO ROMO REPLACED R-I FADED 06/12/01 CORTE MENDOZA AT CAMINO ROMO REPLACED R- 1 FADED 06/12/01 CORTE VILLOSA AT CORET CASTRO REPLACED R-1 FADED 06/12/01 AREA #3 REPLACED 49 S.N.S. 06/14/01 AREA #3 REPLACED 10 S.N.S. 06/14/01 43623 ALTAMURA COURT INSTALLED W-53 06/19/01 VIA MONTEZUMA AT JE? I~ERSON INSTALLED G-7 06/19/01 OVERLAND, DEL RIO AT JEFFERSON INSTALLED 2 G-7 DATE LOCATION WORK COMPLETED 06/19/01 DE PORTOLA AT MARGARITA REPLACED R-7 06/20/01 39977 CHALON COURT INSTALLED W-53 06/20/01 AVENIDA SONOMA AT CORTE SAN LUIS REPLACED R-1 "FADED" 06/20/01 VIA PUESTA DEL SOL INSTALLED 3 R2 "25" 06/21/01 29792 VIA PUESTA DEL SOL INSTALLED R2 25 06/21/01 RANCHO VISTA FEBT REPLACED W41 06/21/01 SOLANA WAY AT MOTOR CAR PARKWAY REPLACED W41 06/25/01 79 SO. AT FRONT STREET REPLACED 4 DELINEATORS 06/26/01 79 SO. AT FRONT STREET REPLACED 1 DELINEATOR 06/26/01 ESPLENDAR COURT AT LOMALINDA REPLACED R- 1 06/27/01 LA PAZ AT YNEZ REPLACED R2 35 TOTAL SIGNS REPLACED 222 TOTAL SIGNS INSTAI,I,ED 7 TOTAL SIGNS REPAIRED S APPROVAL CitY attORNEY DIRECTOR Of fINANCE CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: ClTY OFTEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City ManagedCity Council Jim Domenoe, Chief of Police~ July 24, 2001 Monthly Departmental Report The following report reflects special teams, traffic enforcement and miscellaneous activity occurring during June of 2001. Part One crime statistics are displayed by reporting district within the City, providing stable parameters for monitoring criminal activity, and aiding in planning police resource deployment. The Police Department responded to forty-one "priority one" calls for service during the month of June, with an average response time of approximately 6.1 minutes. A total of 3,404 calls for police service were generated in the City of Temecula during the month. During the month of June, the Temecula Police Department's Town Center storefront served a total of 161 customers. Fingerprinting services for this month showed forty-six prints taken, thirty-eight people filed police reports, twelve people had citations signed off and nine oversized vehicle permits were issued. Crime Prevention Officer Lynn Fanene participated in a number of special events and community oriented programs during the month. Officer Fanene completed a presentation on alcohol safety for a new restaurant opening with an alcohol license. He is also responsible for the planning of the up-coming public safety demonstration for Vail Ranch planned for July 1st. Officer Fanene conducted twelve residential security visits and four business visits during the month. He conducted twenty-two visits to businesses for crime follow-up information. Officer Fanene completed his article for the Valley Business Journal titled "Business Alert." The POP Team continued to work on the "Crime Free Multi Housing" project. At this time there is 70% compliance with this program across the City and they are working with two complexes, which are in the final stages of certification. They are also in the process of working to re-certify four complexes that are continuing with the program. The team continued their Warrant Apprehension Program during the month, which resulted in three misdemeanor warrant arrests and three citations. The team will continue with the Juvenile Decoy Program next month. This program involves businesses that sell alcohol and ensuring that they do not sell to minors. The team continued their Crime Free Parks program with frequent patrol checks. No violations were observed during the Monthly Departmental Report Page 2 month. They also conducted a "Bar Action Response" program and noted no violations. Both the T.A.G. program and off-road vehicle enforcement program will be held in July. The Old Town Storefront serves as an office for the POP team and a location to assist the public with police services. This has greatly increased their availability to serve the Old Town area. This month the Old Town storefront served 112 customers, nine fingerprints were taken, eighteen police reports were written and five citations were signed off. The traffic team reported that during the month of June there were 504 citations issued for hazardous violations, 101 citations were issued for non-hazardous violations and 116 parking citations were issued. During the month there was fifteen injury traffic collisions, forty-nine non- injury collisions were reported and thirty-nine drivers were arrested for DUi. The monthly ERACIT program this month led to the arrest of two subjects for DUI. The Neighborhood Enforcement Team (NET) program resulted in sixty-four citations being issued. This program addresses traffic concerns in residential neighborhoods with a dedicated motor officer. The SLAP program (Stop Light Abuse Program) resulted in eighty-nine citation, s being issued. During the month of June, the POP officers assigned to the Promenade Mall handled a total of 211 calls for service. The predominant number of these calls were for shoplifting investigations. During the month, calls and on-sight activity resulted in the criminal arrest and filings on twelve misdemeanors and two felony cases for various offenses. Fifteen citations were also issued. Officers Robles and Rupe will be continuing with providing training to security staff employees during the month of July. The mall officers are also working on a theft decoy program for next month. The school resource officers continue to remain active during summer school. During the past month, a presentation was conducted for "Stranger Danger." They also conducted counseling sessions with students. One arrest was made at Chaparral High School. School Resource Officer Goss is involved with planning a conference at Chaparral High School in August for area and state school resource officers. This presentation is anticipated to last three days and will feature instructors from various disciplines as presenters. The JOLT program (Juvenile Offender Law Enforcement Program) continues to be a success in part through its youth court program. Deputy Sherry Adams conducted the sixty-eighth youth court session during the month. The JOLT officer assisted at other schools with truancy meetings and follow up with parents of juveniles in the JOLT program. Deputy Adams continued to work with "At Risk" juveniles throughout the month and also conducted counseling sessions with their parents. During the month of June, the Special Enforcement Team of Officers Rich Holder and John Morin handled a total of twenty-five cases. These cases resulted in thirty-two misdemeanor and nine felony arrests, primarily for narcotics violations. They also issued fifteen citations for various violations. This team continues to work street level narcotics and specialty patrol within the city on a pro-active basis. During this month the team was involved with registering narcotics offenders and conducting parole and probation searches. Volunteers from the community continue to be an integral part of the Temecula Police Department's staff. Under the guidance of volunteer coordinator Gayle Gerrish, the Police Department's volunteer staff contributed 520 hours of service in June. Volunteer assignments include computer data input, fogistics support, special event assistance, and telephone answering duties. Monthly Departmental Report Page 3 The reserve officer program and mounted posse are additional valuable volunteer resources available to the police department. The police department utilizes reserve officers to assist with patrol, traffic enforcement, crime prevention, off road vehicle enforcement and a variety of special functions. Reserve police officers worked a total of 307 hours during the month (146 hours were specifically spent on patrol in Temecula). The posse contributed 226 hours during the month (up over 100 hours from last month). APPROVAL City AT~ORNfY //~ DIRECTOR Of fINai~cf ~/~ CiTY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Howard Windsor, City Fire Chief July 17, 2001 Monthly Departmental Report RECOMMENDATION: Attached for City Council's review and filing is the Fire Department's Monthly Activity Report for the month of June, 2001. Response Statistics for June 2001 Structure Fire 7 10 3 0 20 145 Vegetation Fire 6 0 4 2 12 58 Vehicle Fire 5 3 I 0 9 60 Fire - Other Medical Aid Traffic Collisions Fire Menace Standby Public Service 2 I 2 4 9 70 76 47 70 81 274 1564 25 29 11 5 70 404 2 2 1 2 7 66 6 3 8 4 21 124 Hazmat 0 2 0 0 2 N/A Ringing Alarm 20 Responses Outside of the 42 TOTAL 191 34 11 10 75 548 49 19 49 159 N/A 180 130 157 658 3039 Medic Squad 84 Response Statistics Medic Squad 84 Time Statistics Medical Aids 181 1031 Traffic Collisions Public Service Assists Fire Menace Standby's Smscture Fires Ringing Alarm 51 239 6 34 9 44 29 152 1 5 Vegetation Fire Vehicle Fire 0 6 Refuse Fire 1 8 Hazmat 1 5 TOTAL 276 1533 Average Response Time Longest Response Time Medic Squad Cancelled Prior to Patient Contact Average Wait Time for AMR Medic Squad on Scene Prior to AIVIR - Medical Aids and Traffic Collisions 4.99 N/A 12m in N/A 98 527 4.1 min N/A 91 537 Performed *ALS prior to AMR's Arrival 44 241 *ALS - Advanced Life Support Medic Squad Comments: · On five occasions the Medic Squad was on scene grater than 10 minutes before the arrival of AMR. · The longest wait time for AMR was 17 minutes. · Medic Squad 84 had 4 response times ofover 10 minutes. Personnel 1 - Battalion Chief/Fire Marshal 3 - Fire Safety Specialist Fire Prevention 1 - Captain/Deputy Fire Marshal 2 - Fire System Inspectors 1 - Office Technician 1]I Fire Plan Check Statistics Fire Plan Check Building TI 25 138 Fire Plan Check Building Fire Plan Check Misc. 17 88 23 166 Fire Under Ground Water Plan Check 8 51 Fire Over or Under Ground Tank Plan Check 1 5 Fire Sprinkler NCOM Plan Check 4 49 Fire Sprinkler TI Plan Check 13 59 Fire Hood Duct Plan Check 0 14 Fire Spray Booth Plan Check 0 2 Fire Special Suppression Plan Check 0 · Fire Alarm Plan Check 11 57 Plannin$ Case Plan Review 23 127 Fire Code Permits 2 6 TOTAL 127 762 Fire Prevention (Continued) Fire Inspection Statsfics Fire Prevention Final Fire Prevention Shell Fire.Undersround Hydro Fire Thrust Block Fire Over Head Hydro Fire Flow Fire Flush Fire Sprinkler Final Fire Weld Inspection Fire Hood Duct Final Fire Pre- Wire Fire Alarm Final Fire Spray Booth Final Fire Safety Inspection Fire State Mandated Inspection Fire Special Events Inspection Fire Piping Hydro Fire Shear Valves Fire Over/Under Tank Final Fire Special Suppression System Fire Special Project Investigations Fire Administrative - Meetings etc... Fire Misc. Inspections Engine Co. Follow Up Enforcement 16 113 13 70 1 19 1 21 9 55 1 3 1 19 12 75 1 18 5 9 8 36 10 76 0 3 11 59 0 13 0 24 0 1 0 0 0 5 0 1 0 0 0 N/A 2 11 0 3 91 634 TOTAL AP PROVA~,/, ~"'"~ CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANCE CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT July 24, 2001 Monthly Report The following are the recent highlights for the Planning Division of the Community Development Department in the month of June 2001. CURRENT PLANNING ACTIVITIES New Cases The Division received 5~4 new applications for administrative, other minor cases, and home occupations and 1._~3 applications for public hearings during the month of June. The new public hearing cases are as follows: Development Plan Conditional Use Permit Tentative Parcel Map Tentative Tract Map Extension of Time Product Review Lot Line Adjustment General Plan Amendment Specific Plan Amendment 3 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 Status of Maior Proiects Staff is working with project applicants to address any remaining issues and prepare the following cases for public hearing before the Planning Director or Planning Commission: The Villages of Temecula - The design and construction of a 160-unit, 2-story apartment complex w/clubhouse and pool, on the south side of Rancho California Road, between Cosmic Drive and south extension of Moraga, east of the proposed Temecula Ridge Apartments; and a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change to Planned Development Overlay for an office/retail component along Rancho California Road. The community meeting with adjacent property owners and homeowners' associations was held on February 8, 2001. Staff is currently reviewing a re-design of the project. · Harveston (Formerly known as Sweetwater- Lennar Communities) Specific Plan, General Plan Amendment and Development Agreement - the Planning Commission considered and R:",MONTHLY.R P'~?.001 Mu ne 2001 .doc 1 recommended approval at their July 12, 2001 meeting and is scheduled for City Council review on July 24, 2001. Roripaugh Ranch Annexation, Specific Plan, Environmental Impact Report and Development Agreement: Staff has made comments on the draft Specific Plan. The Environmental Impact Report will be recirculated. Staff is currently working with the applicant on the Specific Plan. Meadowview Golf Course -On June 7, 2000, the Planning Commission continued the case off calendar at the request of the applicant. The applicant is preparing a focused EIR, anticipated to be submitted in August 2001. Hilton Garden Hotel - To construct a 100-room hotel on 1.38 acres located on the west side of Rancho Highland Drive, west of Ynez Road. The accompanying General Plan Amendment is on hold with the City Council. Palomar Hotel - Remodel of the existing Palomar Hotel to the Palomar Inn (a bed and breakfast) located on the northeast corner of Front and Fifth Streets. DRC meeting was held on January 27, 2000. Staff is awaiting re-submittal. Waltz Industrial Building - A 9,000 square foot concrete tilt-up facility for N/C Industries located on the southside of Roick Drive and west of Winchester Road. The applicant resubmitted on July 6, 2001 and comments are due July 19, 2001. Sunridge Community Chumh - An 88,918 square foot religious facility in two phases for worship, programs, Sunday school, weddings and funerals, consisting of a single-story, 1,500-seat auditorium with nursery; a two-story, 21-room education facility for elementary through junior high grades; a single-story, 9,840 square foot multi-purpose building with kitchen, lockers and assembly room; a two-story, 10,622 square foot administration and Sunday school building; a single-story, 6,163 square foot youth center building; and a single-story, 1,040 square foot storage and maintenance building. The proposed site is on the west side of the extension of Butterfield Stage Road, 1,400 feet north of Rancho California Road. A community meeting was held on January 11,2001. Staff has requested a supplemental EIR, redesign of the project and another community meeting. Etco Plaza - The design and construction of two speculative buildings, each at 23,500 square feet, on two lots. The lots are located on the east side of Madison Avenue at the end of Sanborn Avenue. The project went to DRC on November 30, 2000 and was scheduled for Planning Commission review on March 28, 2001. This project was continued off calendar for re-design and revised plans are currently under review. Rancho Community Church - Application to design, construct and operate a church and school campus on a 39-acre site. The overall proposal will include 279,957 square feet of religious and school facilities and a 477,449 four story parking structure. The site will be developed in a number of phases beginning with a 1,500 seat interim sanctuary with assembly room and a nursery; a four story, 42,716 square foot administration building, 15 modular classroom buildings, a 9,695 square foot preschool, a 300 seat, 5,856 square foot chapel, two field house buildings totaling 10,000 square feet, and lighted athletic fields. Future phases include permanent first through twelfth grade classroom facilities, a gymnasium, a 3,500 seat, 43,727 square foot worship center, and a parking structure. This project is located on the north side of State Highway 79 South east of Jedidiah Smith Road. DRC meeting was held on December 14, 2000, and staff is awaiting resubmittal. R :%,10 NTH LY. R P'~?.00 l',J u n e 2001 ,doc 2 Overland Self-Storage - A Conditional Use Permit and Development Plan for the design, construction and operation of a 43,174 square foot mini-self storage facility with office, resident manager's quarters and R.V. storage spaces. Located approximately 155 feet north of the intersection of Commerce Center Drive and Overland Drive. This item went to DRC on December 7, 2000. Staff is awaiting resubmittal and expects plans within two weeks. Norm Reeves Acura - Planning Application to design and construct a new 7,675 square foot building, on approximately 2.0 acres of improved land along the '~'nez Corridor Car Dealership" area. The site requires demolition of asphalt and various curb and landscape areas. Located on the west side of Ynez Road, one lot north of the centerline intersection of Solana Road and Ynez Road. Applicant re-submitted on February 7, 2001. Sent incomplete letter for re-submittal on February 28, 2001. Item is scheduled for July 26, 2001 Directors Hearing. Kinder Care Day Care - Planning Application to design and construct a 10,000 square foot day care center within the Winchester Meadows Shopping Center. This has been scheduled for Director's Hearing on July 19, 2001. Alpine Gardens East - Extension of Time for PA 97-0420 Located on the northwest corner of Loma Linda and Pala Roads. The project was approved at the July 11, 2001 Planning Commission meeting. Tentative Pamel Map No. 29822 - Planning Application to subdivide 5.0 vacant acres of property within the Very Low Density Residential (VL) zone into 2 parcels. (2.5 net acres each). Located on Liefer Road. This project went to DRC on October 19, 2000. The Applicant is revising his proposal and has not resubmitted. Overland Corporate Center- An 8,700 square foot one-story office building; 10,000 square foot one-story office building; 20,000 square foot two-story office building; an 8,000 square foot restaurant; a 150 + room hotel; and a future 7,400 square foot office located at the northeast corner of Overland Drive and Margarita Road. The project goes to Planning Commission July 18, 2001. Hampton Inn Suites - Application to design, and construct a 4-story, 75-room hotel building approximately 41,100 square feet. Located on the northeast corner of Jefferson Avenue and Winchester Road Adjacent to the 1-15 off-ramp. DRC meeting was held on January 11,2001. Staff is awaiting resubmittal. Burger King - Conditional Use Permit Application to design and construct a 4,691 square foot drive thru fast food restaurant on Parcel 2, PM 29431, Paseo del Sol. This project is under review. Inland Terrace Investment Group - Development Plan to design and construct a 55,697 square foot office building located on the Western Bypass Parcel 4 of PM 28473. The project was discussed at DRC on May 31,2001. The applicant resubmitted revised exhibits on July 10, 2001. Chamber of Commerce - Development Plan Application to design and construct a 5,910 square foot office building for the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce located on the northeast corner of Ynez Court, east of Ynez Road. The project was discussed at DRC on June 14, 2001. The applicant has resubmitted revised exhibits and pending conditions of approval for Director's Hearing. R:t, MONTHLY. RP'i'~2001~June 2001.doc 3 · Tentative Tract Map - Tentative Tract Planning Application to subdivide planning areas 1,2, 5, 6 and 9 of the Wolf Creek Specific Plan into 631 dwelling units. The project is still under review. Intense Cycles, Inc. - Development Plan application to design and construct a new 13, 000 square foot bicycle manufacturing and distribution building on a vacant 1.25 acre parcel at the northwest corner of Ridge Park Drive and Vincent Moraga Drive. The proposed project was reviewed at the March 22, 2001 DRC meeting. The project was withdrawn July 2001. Villages at Paseo del Sol Bassett Furniture Building H - Administrative Development Plan to design and construct a 30,000 square foot retail home furniture store as part of a phased development plan commercial center located at the northwest corner of Campanula Way and Camino del Sol. The proposed project was reviewed at the May 3, 2001 DRC meeting. The applicant resubmitted plans on May 25, 2001 based on the DRC comments. Staff approved the project July 2001. Castle Pines at Temeku Hills - Product Review application of single family home design for 85 lots with nine individual floor plans and exterior designs located on Royal Oaks Drive at Meadows Parkway. The proposed project was submitted on May 30, 2001. The project was recommended for approval and is scheduled for Director's Hearing on July 26, 2001. Mosco Lot 20 - Development Plan application to design and construct a 16,400 square foot warehouse/office spec building on 1.09 acres. The project is located on Winchester Road between Zero and Colt Ct. The proposed project was submitted on June 22, 2001. Tentative Parcel Map No. 30166 (Southwest Traders) -A Planning Application to subdivide 10.86 acres into three parcels located between Rancho California Road and Winchester Road on Diaz Road currently under review. Golf Career College: Conditional Use Permit application to design and construct a 10,000 square foot golf instruction classroom, administrative center with ancillary pro-shop and a nine hole par three practice course on a twenty acre site along Rancho Vista Road between Margarita Road and Meadows Parkway currently being reviewed for completeness. Penfold Office and Retail Building - Development Plan application to design and construct a 9,500 square foot two-story office and retail building on a 0.16 acre vacant parcel on Front Street between Fifth and Sixth Street s in Old Town Temecula. The project is recommended for approval and is scheduled for Directors Hearing on July 19, 2001. Paloma del Sol Specific Plan Amendment #8, General Plan Amendment and Tentative Tract Map Amendment - To relocate commercial and residential areas within the project boundaries currently under review. Villages at Paseo del Sol - Staples Office Supplies (Building G) -Administrative Development Plan to design and construct a 23, 942 square foot retail store as part of a phased development plan commercial center located at the northwest corner of Campanula Way and Camino del Sol. Revised plans were received July 2, 2001 and comments are due July 12, 2001. Staff is awaiting formal approval of the center design guidelines and landscape plan prior to final project approval. Eli Lilly Tentative Paroel Map 30107 -A commercial subdivision of 40.09 acres into five lots on the southeast corner of Overland Drive and Margarita Road currently under review and environmental assessment. R:~vIONTH LY.R P'i~2.00 l~Jun e 2001 .doc 4 Overland Corporate Center - A development plan for the design and construction of four office buildings totaling 48,000 square feet; and throe future undeveloped aroas capable of accommodating an 8,000 squaro foot office building, up to a 7,500 squaro foot restaurant and a three story 84 room hotel or 13,868 square foot office building on an 11.86 acre lot. Scheduled for Planning Commission review on July 18, 2001. Small Business Assistance Rhythm and Brews: Staff helped the owner of this proposed brewpub apply for redevelopment funds under the Fa(;ade Improvement Program to help him with construction of his firowall, ADA bathroom requirements and signs. The plumbing, electrical and mechanical and structural permits for this project have been issued and the opening is anticipated pending Health Department approval. M and M Art & Frame: Planning Staff worked with the designer of new signs for this business located in Old Town and helped him obtain approval from the Old Town Local Review Board and funding through the Fagade Improvement program. · Waves of Beauty: Helped owner of this existing business obtain approvals for signs at a new location in Old Town Temecula. · Old Tin Box: Met with owner regarding the design and approval of signs for this new business in Old Town. · X's and O's: Staff met with the owners of this new business in Old Town and helped them develop artwork and obtain approvals for new signs. · James Jewelers: Expedited the approval for a new sign for this business located in the Old Town Temecula Emporium Building. · Times of Our Lives Antiques: Staff helped the owners of this new Old Town business obtain approval and funding for signs through the Fa(;ade Improvement Program. Massaqe Establishment Permits · Tracy and Kelly's Massage: Accepted an application for this proposed business to be located at 30630 Rancho California Road, Suite F-502. Special Proiects & Lon,q Ranqe Planninq Activities The Division also commits work efforts toward larger scale and longer time frame projects for both private and public purposes. These activities can range from a relatively simple ordinance or environmental review to a new specific plan or a general plan amendment. Some of the major special projects and long range planning activities aro as follows: Housing Element Update: The City has received the comments of the State Department of Housing and Community Development and is preparing the draft Element for the Planning Commission's consideration. The remaining issue with HCD is local land costs and unit affordability. · Subsequent Environmental Impact Report for the City Redevelopment Plan: This activity is on hold pending the update of a General Plan Circulation Analysis. R:'WIONTHLY. R P'~?.O01 ~June 2001 .doc 5 Comprehensive General Plan Update: The consultant selection committee has recommended that Cotton Bridges & Associates be hired for this project. Initial materials have been provided to the consultant team. The subcommittee structure is currently being evaluated. Traditional Neighborhood Development Ordinance: Final changes are being made prior to scheduling this item for a Planning Commission workshop. This item is on hold pending additional staff resources. Surface Mining Ordinance: The staff and City Attorney had been making final changes based upon feedback from the State prior to submitting this item to the Council for their consideration. This item is on hold pending additional staff resources. Application Fee Study: Staff has provided information to the consultant and Finance Department about changes to our current fee schedule and is currently awaiting revised information. Hillside Development Policy: The policies are being examined for integration into the draft- grading ordinance. This item is on hold pending additional staff resources. Multi-species Habitat Conservation Planning Efforts for Western Riverside County: Councilman Naggar and Planning Staff are attending committee meetings and monitoring the process of determining conservation reserve needs. Large Family Day Care Home Facility Ordinance: The Planning Commission considered this Ordinance amendment at their February 2, 2000 meeting. This item is on hold pending staff resources. Citywide Sign Inventory: The process of inventorying signs is pending additional staff resources. County Project Reviews: Staff continues to allocate significant resoumes to review projects within the County and other local jurisdictions that could affect the City of Temecula. Information regarding these projects will be forwarded under separate cover labeled Projects of Concern. Southside Specific Plan: This item is on hold pending additional staff resources. Development Code Amendment: Is currently being developed by staff and will include reconsideration of the current compact parking space requirements. This will go to the Planning Commission in August. Paloma de Sol Specific Plan, General Plan, and Tentative Tract Map Amendments to relocate commercial and residential areas within the project boundaries. Staff is reviewing the applicant's resubmittal. Tentative Parcel Map 30208 - A commercial subdivision creating 23 lots on 30.14 acres for the project area located along the northeast corner of Margarita Road and Overland Drive at the Promenade Mall. Tentative Parcel Map 30107 - A commercial subdivision of 40.09 acres into 5 lots on the southeast corner of Overland Drive and Margarita Road. R:'~MONTH LY.R P'r~oo l~June 2001 .doc 6 General Plan Amendments Rancho Highlands Drive. Awaiting City Council hearing date. A request to reduce the size of Via Industria (Western Bypass Corridor) north of Avenida AIvarado has been submitted and has been on hold pending the approval of a revised Circulation Element. Geographic Information System {GIS) Activities · A request for proposals has been sent out for the Fire Response Program. It is anticipated that staff will review and bring a recommendation to the City Council at the first meeting in August. · GIS staff will be attending ESRI's annual international user's conference in San Diego the first week of July. Updates to the City's MapObjects program were made. It is anticipated that staff will be unveiling this program as an informational item to the City Council in August and Citywide training will commence shortly after. · Staff has been conducting field verifications of street addressing throughout the City in order to geocode the City's street centerline data. · All City maps and database has been modified to reflect the new City boundary following the Vail Ranch Annexation. · Recent mapping products include: Major CIP project location map for Finance Department Vicinity maps for the Public Works Department Analysis of surrounding property owners near NW Sports Park for City Manager's Office Updates to the Zoning and General Plan Land Use Maps for the Planning Department Vail Ranch street index maps for TCSD and LAFCO Vicinity, zoning and land use maps for Planning Directional map for Human Resources Old Town vicinity maps for Redevelopment Police Reporting Districts map for the Police Department Analysis to identify streets not indicated in Thomas Brothers maps for Public Works Environmental Hazards map for consultant for the Pechangas Proposed Date/Cherry Street alignment map for City Manager's Office Library vicinity map for City Manager's Office Vicinity aerial map for Assistant for Code Enforcement 5-Minute Response area map for Fire Department CC: Staff continues with ongoing data layer development and maintenance. Grant Yates Aaron Adams Gloria Wolnick R:~IONTHLY. R PT~2.001 ~June 2001 .doc 7 CITY ATTORNEyAPPROV~ DIRECTOR OF FINANCE CITY MANAGER ~ CITY OFTEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Manager/City Council Jim O'Grady, Assistant City Manage~''''-''~ July 24, 2001 Economic Development Monthly Departmental Report Prepared by: Gloda Wolnick, Marketing Coordinator The following are the recent highlights for the Economic Development Department for the month of June 2001. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Leads & Inquiries In the month of June, the City received 4 leads and 7 inquiries. The leads included a dentist office, furniture store and an adult dance facility. On June 8th, staff attended a meeting regarding a potential Sports Hospital in Temecula. In the month of June, the Southwest Riverside County Alliance responded to 6 leads from the Inland Empire Economic Partnership (IEEP) on behalf of the City of Temecula. The Alliance received 2 leads from personal referrals and a lead from a past trade show contact. The Alliance received I inquiry from Expansion Management magazine. 93 calls and/or attempts were made to follow-up on recent and past leads. Attached is a copy of their activity report. Film Leads & Hi(3hli~3hts In the month of June, the Film Council received 70 phone calls regarding the Film Festival and 13 calls regarding locations information requests. Major Film Projects Executive Producer, Michelle Fisher, is filming Youth Quake, a film about rock bands. She requested access to the CD's that will be submitted to the Music Festival in September. Ms. Fisher will be filming live performances of the competitions in Temecula dudng August and September. Kurt Wilson of Largo Vista Productions (a ShowBiz Expo contact) attended the Balloon & Wine Festival in search of a location to film a festival sequence in his new film. Mr. Wilson will follow-up with the Inland Empire Film Commission, as this is County property. Please refer to the attached Film Council report for additional activities. CITYMGR\WOLNIC KG~AUGUST'0 0DEPT.KEPT.DOC 1 Media/Outreach Materials The Temecula Profile - Quick Facts marketing brochure was finalized, it will be ready for distribution the week of July 9th. The Profile gives an overview of the City and will be distributed at business trade shows, via EDC and included in the City's business kit. Staff provided updated information on Temecula to the Inland Empire Economic Partnership to include in their 2002 IEEP Fact Book/CD Rom they are currently developing. Staff also provided area retail information for inclusion on their website. Staff wrote an article for the Chamber of Commerce monthly newsletter titled, "Are You Plugged Into Temecula's Electronic City Hall?" The article provided information on what's new and available on our website including rideshare information, business assistance information, City Case Processing Flowcharts, access to Improvement Standards Drawings, access to status of individual's project in Plan Check, demographics, public records and other useful information. Meetin,qs Staff attended the Murrieta/Temecula Group Meeting on June 1= at Bally Winery. Rick Johanson of International Rectifier and Ricki Bauer spoke on how the rolling blackouts have impacted their businesses. Joan Sparkman spoke in favor of the proposed power lines and explained how this additional power is necessary for our businesses. Staff met with various auto dealers to discuss possible additional auto dealerships as well as representatives of Roel Construction. Staff attended numerous meetings in June regarding the Harveston and Roripaugh developments. On June 7th, staff attended the EDC of Southwest Riverside County's Business Relations Committee Meeting. Company contact reports were given which included: Utah Pacific Construction, Earl & Pete's Finish, Lewis Valley Construction, Parkside Products, ADEX, Stewart's Cabinet Company, Unique Precision Industries, Gene Williams Machine and Thompson Magnetics. On June 8th, staff attended the Temecula CONNECT Director's Luncheon at Temecula Creek Inn. The Temecula CONNECT program will be changing its affiliation with UCSD to UCR and will become known as UCR Connect. Its mission will continue to be to assist hi-tech industries get established and grow in this area. Representatives of the Inland Empire Economic Partnership met with city staff on June 12th to review their program and activities and answered questions asked by staff. Staff attended the Southwest Riverside County Economic Alliance Meeting, which was held on June 13th. Cutting Edge Marketing presented the Alliance CD Rom in which the partners viewed and made some suggestions for revisions. An update was given on the Broker's Breakfast at Bear Creek scheduled for the 20th and there was discussion on the proposed GIS component for their website. Staff attended the Chamber of Commerce Talk of the Town on June 14th. "Economic Realities for the Temecula Valley~' was presented by Dr. John Husing. Over 200 business members attended this informational session. Economic Development Sub-committee members Comerchem and Roberts and staff met with Larry Denton, Chief Financial Officer for Tension Envelope, on June 27th regarding Tension Envelope and the proposed refunding of the $3.8 million outstanding industrial development bonds ("IDBs"). Solid State Stamping is considering an expansion and contacted staff to see what incentives and programs the City could offer them to keep their expansion local. Staff and Mayor Comerchero provided Don Jones of Solid State Stamping with information on various programs such as our homebuyer's assistance program, Industrial Development Bond Financing, as well as other advantages of Temecula (Iow business license fee, no utility tax, etc.). A meeting was held on June 28th with Mr. Jones to discuss this further. Staff attended the Economic Alliance Broker Breakfast Meeting at Bear Creek Golf Resort on June 20th. The Assistant City Managers of Lake Elsinore, Murdeta and Temecula updated the local commercial brokers on new developments occurring in each of their communities. The EDC, County of Riverside and the Economic Alliance also provided updates, information on the City's FY2001-02 Budget, planning developments on Temecula, and latest census data was assembled and distributed to the brokers. Staff attended the Economic Development Corporation of Southwest Riverside County's Board of Director's Meeting on June 21st. Items covered included the nominations for their executive officers, the EDC's membership campaign for the new fiscal year, energy issues regarding information on the Rainbow Valley Interconnect Project and an update on the Riverside County Integrated Plan. On June 22"d, staff along with 150 elected officials and community leaders attended a briefing on the final plans for the Pechanga Hotel & Casino. Pechanga officials unveiled their development, which will include a Four Star Hotel, 40,000 sq. ft conference center, seven restaurants, 75,000 sq. ft. casino, gift shop and box office. On June 26th, staff met with Will Tipton of M & H Properties regarding possible tenants for the old COSTCO building. Staff attended the Inland Empire Economic Partnership Membership Luncheon on June 27th at the Riverside Convention Center. "Natural Resources - Water Issues" was the program topic and the featured speakers included: John Brudin with EMWD, Robert DeLoach with Cucamonga County Water District, Richard Atwater of Inland Empire Utilities Agency, Tim Skrove of MWD and Joseph Grindstaff of SAWPA. The speakers talked about what each agency was doing to conserve and provide water resources for our future needs. At the rapid rate the population is increasing it is anticipated that there will be a shortfall of water for all people living in Southern California. They spoke on water conservation measures, recycling, groundwater banking, and desalters that are planned and underway. They also spoke of the State and Federal funding for vadous projects they are seeking. TOURISM Medial Outreach Materials On June 29th, staff held a meeting with the City's toudsm marketing partners to discuss the development of the Temecula Tourism CD Rom. The partners provided input to Group One Productions, who will be developing the product. The CD Rom will be interactive with City/Chamber websites and links will be provided to local toudsm groups. The City's Quarterly Calendar of Events was sent out to the media in June. The Frontier Days Rodeo and the Balloon & Wine Festival events were published in the May/June issue of Westways Magazine. The LA Daily Journal contacted the City stating that the Old Town Hot Summer Nights will be featured in their calendar section the week of July 14th. The San Diegan annual publication was published in June. The City has a full-page ad along with a chapter highlighting our araa as a toudsm destination as well as a place for business and to live. The publication reaches 5 million readers annually via 34,000 hotel rooms in San Diego, Rosadto Beach and Ensenada, and sold nationally in all major bookstores. The guides ara also distributed to 150 of San Diego's top corporations for VIPs, new executive employees and CEO's. (see attached) The San Diego Convention & Visitors Bureau Visitor's Guide was published in June (see attached). The City advertises in this visitors guide which is published twice a year and is distributed to both leisure and business travelers upon their arrival in San Diego. As a follow-up to the San Diego/Orange County Concierge Associations visit to Temecula, the City will be participating in a co-op ad in Where Magazine. This publication is distributed by concierges and found in premier hotel rooms in Orange County. This publication reaches the affluent traveler. Added benefits include being featured in the concierge's newsletter and access to the concierge's mailing list. Meetings On July 1st, staff met with Pat Martinez regarding her new business. Ms. Martinez is opening up a Destination Management business that provides trips and tours to Temecula from the Orange County area. Staff provided her with toudsm information and contacts. City and Chamber staff held an informational meeting on June 5th with the volunteers that would be staffing The Balloon & Wine Festival City/Chamber Booth. The booth was a great success. Visitors were encouraged to fill out a visitor profile survey and were provided with a wine lapel pin donated by Joann's Fabdcs. Staff attended the Board of Directors Meeting for the Inland Empire Tourism Council on July 13th. This was the first meeting held since the restructuring of the Tourism Council. The new board members met and were updated with the Tourism Council's activities which included a new toudsm e-mail newsletter, toudsm website and trade show participation. Staff attended the Chamber FAM Tour Committee Meeting, which was held on June 26th. The event is scheduled for October 20 - 21, which will tie in with the opening of the Temecula Creek Inn expansion celebration. The itinerary was finalized and the committee identified specific travel media to invite. On June 28th, staff met with Maggie Allen of the Film Council regarding Film Council activities and the Tourism CD Rom project. ATTACHMENTS Temecula Valley Chamber (~f Commerce Activities Report Economic Development Corporation of Southwest Riverside County Activities Report Southwest Riverside County Economic Alliance Activities Report Inland Empire Economic Partnership Activities Report Temecula Valley Film Council Activities Report Media Coverage 27450 Ynez Road, Suite 124 Temecula, CA 92591 Phone (909) 676-5090 · Fax (909) 694-0201 July 11, 2001 Shawn Nelson, City Manager City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 Dear Shawn, Attached please find the Monthly Activity Report provided as per our contract with the City of Temecula. ' This is the month of June at a glance: Business Inquiry Highlights: In the month of June, 11 businesses requested information on starting or relocating their business in Temecula. They received a business packet, which includes a copy of the City of Temecula demographic, relocation, housing, rentals, maps, organizations, etc. Committee Highlights: Tourism & Visitors Council: The City/Chamber Tourism & Community Information Booth at the Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival was a huge success! Volunteers distributed Temecuia tourism information and assisted visitors with area information and event questions. Visitors were given a special gift pin (donated by JoAnn ETC.) when completing TVCC's Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival Visitor's Survey. Over 400 survey's were filled out and turned in! FAM Tour Task Force leaders have met several times to discuss the upcoming FAM Tour. A comprehensive list of Travel Writers has been compiled and will be reviewed to create an invitation list. A fall date has been established duc to availability of rooms. Task Force leaders are currently updating the "Big Business" presentation statistics. The purpose of the presentation is to educate the community on the importance and impact tourism has on the community. Education Committee: The committee is encouraging Chamber businesses to participate in the TVUSD PTA Partnership. Businesses can join the PTA Partnership by paying the $102.00 annual membership dues that encompass all of the 17 schools and receive full voting rights. The Temecula Valley Youth Job Fair was such a huge success that the committee has decided to hold the event next year. Ways & Means Committee: "Talk of the Town" Economic Realities for the Temecula Valley, was a huge success with over 200 business members in attendance. For a complete copy of John Husing's power point presentation, email John Husing at john~johnhussing.com. Monte Carlo Extravaganza has been scheduled for Wednesday, September 19, 2001 at Wilson Creek Winery. The committee is very excited and has added more activities. Enjoy casino gaming, live music, satellite horse racing, hand writing analysis, dunk tank, food and wine. Purchase your tickets now and you will receive an opportunity to win $1,000 cash! Local Business Promotions Committee: Shop Temecula First campaign ended July 2, 2001. The Grand Prize winner was Shylyrm Goodman who shopped at Beds "N Threads. The committee has decided to join forces with Roundtable Discussion Group to host the events. Business of the month for July is Vail Lake Resort and Lake Elsinore Outlet. The Mystery Shopper for July is Temecula Country Store and the Chamber Spotlight business is West Coast Window Cleaning. Government Action Committee: The Government Action Committee and Board of Directors are supporting bills AB 1299 (Leonard) Public Education Facility Funding and SBX2 72 (Poochigian) Overtime; intermptible energy contract. A letter has been sent to Senator Ray Haynes regarding California State Reapportionment recommending to the California State Assembly Committee on Elections, Reapportionment, and Constitutional Amendments the need to keep the redistricting committee from creating districts combining a part of the Inland Empire with part of Orange or L.A. County. The Pro-Business Campaign was kicked-off at the Talk of the Town event with guest speaker John E. Husing Ph.D. The goal of this campaign is to educate the community on the contributions, commitments, and distribution of retail tax dollars from local businesses. The public will be encouraged to get out and vote this November. Good-Morning Sacramento is scheduled for August 9, 2001 at Callaway's, and Good-Moming Washington DC is tentatively scheduled for October 2001. Membership Committee: Chamber staff and Ambassadors attended 13 Ribbon Cuttings in the month of June. A very successful Mixer was held at Arizona Tile on June 20t~ 2001 with over 200 guests in attendance. "Membership is Everybody's Business" a year long drive, encourages everyone to participate, and receive prizes. Next mixer will be on July 18, 2001 hosted by Boys & Girls Club. New membership directories available at the Chamber office. Tourism Highlights (Bulk brochure distribution) Activity Report: · 950 Winery Brochures, 500 Temecula Brochures, 300 Visitor Guides, 500 Community Event Flyers and 588 Temecula Grape Pins for distribution at the Balloon & Wine Festival Chamber/City Tourism Community Information Booth. · 900 Temecula Brochures and 225 Visitor Guides to Timmy d. Production for distribution at the Gourd Festival. · 340 Winery Brochures, 350 Visitor Guides, and 150 Temecula Brochures to TVCC's Weekend Visitor Center. · 100 Temecula Brochures, 100 Visitor Guides and 100 Winery Brochures to Outdoor Resorts for distribution to visitors. · 100 Temecula Brochures, 100 Visitor Guides and 100 Winery Brochures to Coldwell Banker for distribution to clients. · 100 Temecula Brochures and 100 Winery Brochures to Desert Hills Premium Outlets for distribution to visitors. · 100 Visitor Guides and 100 Winery Brochures to Bella Sante' for distribution to clients. · 100 Temecula Brochures to Carl Stalowski for distribution to wedding guests. 2 · 50 Temecula Brochures, 50 Visitor Guides and 50 Winery Brochures to Rancon for trade show distribution. · 25 Temecula Brochures, 25 Visitor Guides and 25 Winery Brochures to 10 Travel Club for distribution to the group touring Temecula. · 12 City Reference Guides and 10 Relocation Packets to Boston Scientific for distribution to clients. · 12 Temecula Brochures to Robert Lewis for distribution to guests coming to Temecula. Activity Report: · Total Tourism calls were up 14 percent in June. · Total Phone calls were 3,970 in June. · Total Walk-ins were up 51 percent in June. · Total Mailings were up 24.80 percent in June. · E-mail requests were up 75.40 percent in June. Also attached are the meeting minutes fOr-the Tourism and Visitors Council, Education, Ways & Means, Membership and Marketing Committee, Local Business Promotions, Government Actions and a July edition of Teme~ula Today! If you_have any questions regarding this information, please call me at (909) 676-5090. Thankyou. / ~lce ~umvan President/CEO Mayor Jeff Comerchero Mayor Pro Tern Ron Roberts Councilman Jeff Stone Councilman Sam Pratt Councilman Mike Naggar Shawn Nelson, City Manager Jim O'Grady, Assistant City Manager Gary Thomhill, Deputy City Manager Gloria Wolnick, Marketing Coordina~r TVCC Board of Directors TEMECULA VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT FOR JUNE, 2001 Chamber Vis. Center Total PHONE CALLS This Month This Month Year-To-Date TOURISM TOURISM REFERRALS 335 2,156 Calendar of Events 251 1,173 Speciar Events 420 1,894 General information 1,384 7,081 TOTAL TOURISM CALLS 2,390 12,304 RELOCATION 247 1,315 DEMOGRAPHICS 106 467 CHAMBER 1,005 7,782 MISCELLANEOUS 222 1,168 TOTAL PHONE CALLS 3,970 23,038 * CHAMBER REFERRALS N/A N/A WALK-INS TOURISM 305 154 2,571 CALENDAR OF EVENTS 185 4 1,052 SPECIAL EVENTS 151 34 697 GENERAL INFORMATION 1,153 206 7,284 RELOCATION 233 6 1,447 DEMOGRAPHICS 160 0 578 CHAMBER 874 0 5,401 MISCELLANEOUS 222 1 1,133 TOTAL WALK-INS 3,283 405 20,163 MAILINGS TOURISM 93 724 RELOCATION 120 665 DEMOGRAPHICS 94 503 TOTAL MAILINGS 307 1,892 E-MAIL TOURISM 67 298 RELOCATION 39 236 MISCELLANEOUS 115 680 TOTAL E-MAIL 221 1,214 WEB PAGE USER SESSIONS N/A N/A GRAND TOTALS PHONE CALLS WALK-INS MAILINGs E-MAIL THiS MONTH YEAR-TO-DATE 3,970 23,036 3,688 20,163 307 1,892 221 1,214 CHAMBER REFERRALS N/A ANNUAL VOLUME COMPARISONS Chamber Chamber June, 2000 June, 2001 Percentage Increase PHONE CALLS TOURISM Tourism Referrals 268 335 25 Calendar of Events 168 251 49 Special Events 639 420 -34 General Information 1,019 1,384 36 TOTAL TOURISM CALLS 2,094 2,390 14 RELOCATION 155 247 59 DEMOGRAPHICS 42 106 152 CHAMBER 1,438 1,005 -30 MISCELLANEOUS 387 222 -43 TOTAL PHONE CALLS 4,116 3,970 -4 CHAMBER REFERRALS N/A N/A N/A WALK-INS TOURISM 1-83 305 67 CALENDAR OF EVENTS 127 185 46 SPECIAL EVENTS 74 151 104 GENERAL INFORMATION 421 ~ 1,153 174 RELOCATION 228 233 2 DEMOGRAPHICS 79 160 103 CHAMBER 802 874 9 MISCELLANEOUS 209 222 6 VISITOR CENTER WALK-INS 326 405 24 TOTAL WALK-INS 2,449 3,688 51 MAILINGS TOURISM 102 93 -8.82 RELOCATION 77 120 55.84 DEMOGRAPHICS 67 94 40.30 TOTAL MAILINGS 246 307 24.80 E-MAIL TOURISM 28 67 139.29 RELOCATION 37 39 5.41 MISCELLANEOUS 61 115 88.52 TOTAL E-MAIL 126 221 75.40 * Chamber referrals reflects faxes, walk-ins and phone calls 7-13-201 4:24PM FROM ~_2 July 13, 2001 City of Tcrne~mla PO Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589 RE: ActiviW Summary -.lun¢ 2001 Activitie~ of thc EDC for the month of June were as follows: Business Development Staff rcc~ved the follo,,vi~g three business ~l~m~t I~ for ~ ~ of J~c: A phone ~qui~ ~om ~ GoI~ ~o's cx~ is ~ p~c ~yc[~ sy~s s~ifm to p~c ~p~ ~r s~ppmg ~xes. Mr. Gol~ ~ r~c~g ~pon~i~ to s~ up a 50~000 s.f pl~t ~u~u~ r~cl~ p~c ~p~. He ~t a similar p~t in ~vc~idc some ~ b~ w~ch w~ rcl~a~ m B~. S~ pro~ ~. Gol~ wi~ ~ ~u~ ~si~ of ~s ~ 1~ pl~ic ~u~rs ~d vem~ ~i~ ~s~. * A ph~e i~u~ ~b ~k of Co~er ~tio~ m S~ Diego, who r~ue~ 2000 ~us ~cs for ~c cid~ of Mu~c~ ~d Tcm~ul~ Staff ~so pmvi~ ~ for ~ cities. A phone Mqui~ ~om Caroline T~ who ~u~ s~o d~t ~ info~ti~ ~d various ~ ~o~phics ~ ~lp her ~ a ~-up ~m~y. MS. T~ would be ~n~&g h~c s~sa ~r co--er ~p~. She ~y liv~ in T~uI~ but ~ a ~ly~ M~ ~ S~ Di~o. Marketinu Outreach Staffatt~ndcd thc following mc~tin~/~vcnts: June 1, 20001 - Murrieta TemeCUla Group Meeting - Staff attended the Muxrieta Temecula Group meting that discussed the impact ofth~ energy crisis on manufacturing, with emphasis on plastic manufacturing. * June 8, 2001 - Temecula Connect Annual Director' Luncheon - Staff atx~dcd thc annual Temccula Connect Dir~ctor~' Luncheon at Tcmecula Creek Inn. EffCC~v¢ July 1~ Temecula Connect x~ll change its name to UCR Connect. June Il, 2001 - ]~I)C 7~h Annual Golf Tournament June 14, 2001 - Temecula Valley Chamber's "Talk of thc Town~ · June 20, 2001 - SWRC Economic Alliance Quarterly Brokers' Meeting - Staff attended thc qua~erly brokc~' meeting and provid~xi a bficf EDC update. June 28, 2001 - City of Murrieta Quarterly Brokers' Meeting - Staff attgndcd the quartgr]y brokers' mec~ that cS,'used updates from City planning and guest speakers from thc California Environmental Pr0t~tiun Agency and Adclphia Cable. 7-13-201 A:2B~M FROM City of Tem~ula Ac0vity Summary - June 2001 Page 2 of 2 Business Relations Jmm 1, 2001 - Staff attended the EDC Business Relations CommitU~ Meeting. details.) meeting minutes for Admini~rafioo/.O rgn-i~-tinn · June 21, 2001 EDC Board of Directors Meeting held in thc Workforc¢ Development Cemer in Temecula. (Sec meeting minutes for details.) · June 28, 2001 - Workforee Development Center Partner Meeting held in thc Workforce I~veloprmmt Center iD Temecula. Topics included mum'al issues and ioterests relative m each agency in th~ Ccut~r. · June 28, 2001 - EDC Program Committee Meeting - Discussion to prepare for the next quart~ly luncheon on July 26. · Administration - During the month of June, staff managed ~hc daily operations of thc EDC office, facilitated the annual director elections, coordinated details for the annual golf tournament on Juao 11, and prepared thc quart~ly newsletter. This concludes the activity smmmay for June 2001. Should you have questions or need further detail, please call me at 600-6064. Sincerely, Diane Sessions EDC of Southwest Rive~id¢ Count~ ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY BUSINESS RELATIONS COMMITTEE MEETING ThurSday, June 7, 2001 - 9:00 a.m. Workforce Development Center, Executive Board Room 27447 Enterprise Circle West, Temeenla, CA Committee Members Present~- Marline Best, City of Lake Elsinore Keith $ohnson, IVfissions Oaks National Bank Michael Lewin, Mirau, Edwards, Carmen, l-latter & Lewin Para Migliozzi, Dawn Human Kcsourcc~ Lori Moss, City o£Murrieta Mark O'Connor, Lee & Associates Jim O'Grady, City of Temecula Rex Oliver, Murrieta Chamber of Commarce Bonnie Ranz-Hanna, Diversified, The Staffing Solution David Rosenthal, SWRC Manufaeturers' Council Robert Ryan, Keeton Construction Diane Sessions, ]EDC Staff Alice Sullivan, Temecula Valley Chamber of C0mmerce Grant Yates, City of Temecula Craw Youmans. Community National Bank Also In Attendance: 1oan Pagliai, EDC Staff Call To Order * Committee Chair Michael Lewin called the meeting to order at 9:07 a.m. Welcome * Michael Lewin welcomed committee members and thanked all for attending. Fpllow-up Action Reports · WaterStone - Diane Sessions reported she provided three local marketing firm contacts to the business owner. Follow-up was completed and the item was closed · Apex Manufacturing - Owner's major concern was lack of local affordable housing for employees. Jim O'Grady reported he believed follow-up was made but would reconfirm the business name before the item was closed. He would report on the follow-up at the July meeting. Company Contact Reports · Utah Pacific Construction - Rex Oliver reported he and Loft Moss paid a visit with owner Craig Young of Utah Pacific Constmciion in Murrieta. The company specializes in underground pipeline construction for sewer/water systems and also runs a storage yard for heavy equipment. The company has been in operation for 13 years in Southwest Riverside County, with 50-60 employees depending on the season. The owner indicated his interest to expand into Northern California because of less competition. Primary customers are public jurisdictions and schools, with little or no ?-12-201 ~:26PM FROM Business Relations Committee Meeting Minutes - June 7, 2001 Page 2 of 6 local competitors because of the spcdaliTed type of construction. The company is self-ranked as medium in size, with sales up in the past year and revenues at $20 million. Local economy is ranked stable. Mr. Young indicated that his business increases when thc private market is down. Pfindpal suppliers are steel pipe and water valve/fitting manufacturers located in Fontana, Escondido and Los Angeles. The company plans to increase employees in the foreseeable future. Mr. Young also owns Allied Sigt~ s at Washington and Ivy intersection, and recently purchased 20 acres in unincorporated Riverside County near Scott and I-Iaun Roads. Hc indicated the need for flood control approval for his adjacent parcel and wanted to install a perimeter fence. He indicated his interest ufa realignment of Monroe Street for easy fre~vay acc, ess for his trucks and equipment. Mr. Oliver and Ms. Moss would set up a meeting with city staffto discuss a realignment. Earl & Pete~s Finish -Lori Moss stated she would report on the visit at the July meeting. Lewis Valley Contraetor~ -Lori Moss reported a phone interview with owner Jim Hunter of Lewis Valley Contractors in Muni~a. The company is a general contractor speciali.zing in grading and paving. A privately-held corporation with eight employees, Lewis Valley has been in Southwest Riverside County for 23 years. The owner relocated from Huntington Beach, CA duc to his preference of the area. Many years ago he fished and hunted in Southwest Riverside County. Primary customers included commercial, residential, and church developments, The company does not seek government contracts due to certifi~i payrolls that are a "headache". Lewis Valley helped develop Calvary Chapel and provided maintenance services for the City of Murrieta before incorporation. The owner had concerns about increased oil prices that effect asphalt costs. He ranked the economy as good now but could get~ Worse for his business in the near future. Principal suppliers are all local asphalt/base/gravel firms located in Romoland, Lake Elsinore, and Temecula. There are seven employees that live locally.and ohe that commutes from San Diego. The owner has no plans for. expansion or to increase the number.of employees. The owner had no outstanding concerns and was very happy doing business in Murrieta. Sweeney Associates and Parkside Products -.Loft MOss reported a phone interview with Office Manager Debbic Baldwin of Sweeney & Associates and parkside Products. Sweeney & Associates is an autocad designer of landscape irrigation systems., Parkside Products was created to manufacturer backflow device covers, also known as "sleeping bags;' for backflow devices. Both companies are privately-held corporations with twelve emPloYees who design for Sweeney and one ~nnployee in sewer backflow .technology for Parksid¢. Sweeney has been in operation for l I years total, with seven years in Southwest Riverside County, Paxkside,has been in operation for one year. Thc owner lives in Mutrieta and relocated Sween~y from San Diego. Primary customers are landscape contractors, and primary competitors are located in Northern California and other states. The business wa~ self-ranked as very small in its industry with only two known companies producing a similar product. Sales were up in the past year due to product marketing efforts. The local economy was ranked as getting better. Principal suppliers are landscape valve manufacturers, foam molders/filling firms, and foil product companies in Torrance and Cerritos, CA, and Indiana. Business Relations Committee Meeting Minutes - June 7, 2001 Page 3 0£6 The owner had no plans for site expansion and would likely increase thc number ofemployees..The owner had no outstanding concerns and was vei~ happy doing business in Murrieta. ADEX Medleal Supplies - Grant Yates reported a visit with Michael Ghafouri. owner of ADEX Medical Supplies in Temecela. Mr. Ghafouri relocated from Orange County where he operated a cosmetic enterprise and medical supply business. ADEX was sail-ranked small with five employees who llve ~ Orange Cpunty..The company has bccn in Southwest Riversidc County for six years and manufactures medic~al masks and gloves for stoile environments. Thc owner would like to expand the business and possibly build his own site. Mr. Ohafouri had unfavorable issues with the US Postal Service and was provided a contact at Maarice Printers who had worked with USPS on similar issues. The company's primary suppliers were reported as overseas companies. Stcwart's Cabinet Company - Alice Sullivan reported a phone interview with Carol Stewart, owner of Ytcwart's.Cabinet Company in Temecula. The company relocated to the area from Orange County 13 years ago and had been in operation since 1971. Owners are third-generation cabinet makers with five employees. No survey was completed. Unique Precision Industries - Alice Sullivan reported she would meet with the owners of Unique Precision Industries at a later date. G~ne Williams Machine - Alice Sullivan reported a phone interview with Gene Williams. The company is a small machine shop that manufacturers medical and aircraft products. The business was reported as doing well with no issues or concerns.. No survey was completed. Thompson Magnetics - Robert Ryan repo~ti~d a Visit with Howard ,Thompson, owner of Thompson Magnetics in Tcmccula. The company has two s~parat¢ operations that manufacturer electric components andmutomotive products.. Mr.! ThompsO0 relocated from Fullerton and employs twclvc employees who llve locally. The company exports products'4o primary customers overseas and has no local competitors. Suppliers provide casting/molding for auto and electronic industries and are located throughout the U.S. Sales for the past year remain steady witJa no plans for site or labor force expansion. Mr. Thompson was concerned about the 'long-time construction on Felix Valdez and i ' requested £cedback on the issue. J ua 0 Grady stated the construction delays could be due to Rancho Water District water line issues. Mr. O'G~ady Would follow up with the owner. Southwest Tile& Granite - Robert Ryan reported a visit with. the owner of Southwest Tile & Granite in Tcmecula. The company is a sales/distribution center for tile and granite products. The owner relocated the business to Southwest Riverside County eight years ago to get away from Orange County congestion. The company employs 8 to 14 employees depending on the volume of business. Primary customers are both the general public and contractors/boilders of tract home projects. Primary competitors are located .in surrounding counties. Primary suppliers are located in Los Angeles and San Diego, with imports coming tiom M6xico and into ports of Los Angeles. There were no plans for site or labor force expansion.. The owne!' had no issues or concerns. Laser Power Corporation - Keith Johnson, reported a. Visit with Jim Martinelli, general manager of Laser Power Corporation (owned by. Il VI,. apulllie corporation) in Murrieta/French Valley region. Business Relations Committee Meeting Minutes - June 7, 2001 Pa~e 4 of 6 The company manufacturers optics for military use, windows for infrared systems (night vision), and advanced lasers for cutting, in operation for 20 years -- eight years in Southwest Riverside County-- the company employs two hundred locally, twenty-five in Mexico, and twelve in Belgium. The company's labor forces is located in various areas as follows: 33% in Murrieta. rremeoala, 10% in Lake Elsinore, :20% in other Riverside County areas, 30% in San Diego County, and 6% in Orange County. The company relocated fi.om Del Mar due to lower facility costs. The cost and number of the local labor force were indicated as advamages of the area. The energy crisis was reported as a disadvantage of the area. Mr. Maninelli indicated the company would spend approximately $400k for a back-up power system and would not expand the site location in the region due to unreliable energy service. Primary customers are military and industrial manufacturers. Primary customers are located globally. Primasy competitors are DRS Tech in Florida, Ooodfich in Danbury, cT, and Laser Research in California, with others in Japan and Europe. Principal suppliers are domestics machine shops and zinc/sapphire/exotic material (crystals) suppliers. The company was self-ranked as small in their, industty, with sales up in the past year due to new technology. The local economy was ranked as getting better. There were no plans to expand the site location in the region or the labor force. The company was happy doing business in Southwest Riverside County although the major concern was the power crisis. M[i Johnson reported the company participated in the recent career fair and was very pleased with {he attendance. ,Mr.~ Johnson also reported Mr. Martinelli appredated the packet of wage data sent ~o him bythe !EDC. * ~ Youmans reported he met wi{h Su~an Norton, of~Guidant,~who indicated she would like to become mor~ im;olved in E ' ' " ~ DC act~vitms. 'Ms. Norton indicated during the visit there was a push by other corporate directors to expand or re!oeate the business to Texas or other states that were not experiencing,theienergy crisis. . .,. ,, : ~ .. · The Committee &scussed the Rainbow Valley Interconnect Project and the potential negative impa~t on all businesses/if there w~ro not adequate means to transmit el~tridty, David Rosenthal reported the special interest group CA.R.E. would supp6rt.the, power lines on behalf of the businesses in the region.' Jim O'Grady ir0ported the City of Temecula had several major concerns with the alignment path of the proposed lines and had requesied the PuC to look very closely at alternate routes further east. Loft Moss reported the City of Murfieta,:sent !he,PUC an Opposition ]ette, and supports the City of Temecula in their concerns. The Committee agreed it was a very complex issue that would require fi~rther education and information. , EDCmff would send. an email announcement of the public hearings~heduled by the PUC. ~ :~ Goal Pro ess Re orr ' , Michael Lewin announced that visits and phone interviews jn the eleventh month of the fiscal year were close to year-end goals as follows: . , ,. ~.,?? · cro wsrr Actual 22 Goal 22 7-13-2~! -~ :28~M FRO~ P- 8 Business Rela6ons Committee Meeting Minutes - June 7, 2001 Page 5 of 6 Annual Goal: 27 visits ~ 3 points each + 33 phone interviews ~ 1 points each = 60 visits/calls (~114 points ¥'l'D VISIT PHONE POINTS A~tual 22' 25 91 Goal 27 33 114 Variance ~ 5' - 8 -23 New Committee Assignments · Point persons assigned for June 2001 visits were David Rosenthal green binder #5, and Dick Kurtz - blue binder ~4, and Rex Oliver - green binder #3. Alice Sullivan returned blue binder 05, Lori Moss returned blue binder #3 from a previous month, Lisa Gar¢ia- Gleissner returned blue binder ~2, Dennis Frank returned green binder #2 from a previous month, and Robert Ryan retained green binder EDC N, ews and Other Inform~,~e-, * EDC Board Update - Gary Youmans reported final preparations for thc golf tournament were under way, with 120 golfers registered to date. · City, County & Chamber Updates - C/ty of Murri~ta - Lori Moss reported the propc~y tax overpayment issue was in suspension for further exam; the City's l0s anniversary celebration would be held on June 30 from 2:00 p.m. to 10 p.m. at the Col Oaks Sports Park in Mmrieta; annexation of properties near Winchester were moving forward; the Temecula Connect lunch was scheduled for June $; the City's budget was approved; and the purchase of the Town Hall Center was approved. City of Lake £Lsinore - Marlene Best reported the City dedicated the new corporate yard; a revenue workshop was scheduled: Mission Trail, Franklin, and Lake Street improvement plans were in process; there were 3 proposed buildings in .design review; the City and the water district were in talks to settle a water supply dispute; and ~the Ci..~. of Lake Elsinore gave a proclamation on bcbaif of Gary Youmans for his recent SBA award.. C/ty of Temecula . Jim O'Grady reported thc City Council would consider an increase in Deyelopmem lmpa~t Fees for commercial and residential on June 12; the Interregional Grant was approved to SANDAG as thc lead agency to study the jobs/housing imbalance that exists between Riverside and San Diego counties; the grant could allow the Economic Alliance the funding needed to complete a commuter survey; the Iow-water crossing at Via Montezuma was in construction; the City's budget would go. to City Council for approval on June 12; a Vail Ranch annexation celebration was scheduled for July 1, and Riverside County Transit Agency would COmplete a survey for intcres~ in transit riding. Riverside County EDA - No report available. Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce . Alice Sullivan reported the Chamber's Government Action Committee would launch a pro-business campaign; the Tourism Committee would develop a CD-ROM; Talk of the Town was scheduled for June 14 at 7:30 a.m. at Temecula Cr~..k Inn; and the youth job fair was well attended. Murtleta Chamber of Commerce - Rex Oliver reported the Chamber Installation Dinner would be held the end of June; the Business Resource 7-13-201 4:29PM FROM P. 9 Bu~ncssRelations CornmitteeMeeting Minutes- June 7, 2001 Page 6 of 6 Guide was in print production; the }'uno n'uxer would be held this evening; the Jefferson Corridor' Project would sec t~o lanes opened within 9 months to accommodate businesses affected by construction closures. SWRC Manufacturers' Council - David Roscnthal reported thc Council believes businesses in surrounding counties may consider relocation to the region if they were aware of the number of resident employees who commuted to jobs in those counties; Mission Oaks National Bank would hold the Council's scholarship fund account; and thc Council formed an Energy Resource Committee, with Paul O'Neal as Committee Chair. SWRC Economic Alliance - No report available. Adionrnm.ent The meeting adjourned at 10:30 a.m. (:ibrd Ldm Bdl~ t909) 600~(X~O ECONOMIC ALLIANCE TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Madene Best Jim O'Grady Assistant City Manager Assistant City Manager City of Lake Elsinore City of Temecula Stevie Field Economic Development/Marketing Coordinator July 1, 2001 SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY MONTHLY MARKETING UPDATE Lod Moss Assistant City Manager City of Murrieta Dear Partners: Please consider this an update on the marketing activities for the Alliance as required in the Southwest Riverside County Marketing for Business Attraction Agreement. Leads: The Alliance had ten leads in June. Of these leads, six were from IEEP, two from personal referrals, one from a past trade show contact and one from Expansion Management Magazine. 93 calls and/or attempts were made to follow-up on recent and past leads. Consulting Mr. Nater will be joining the Alliance as a consultant effective July 16a, 2001. After speaking to Mr. Nater on the phone, he stated he will join us at our regular Partner meeting on July 11th, and looks forward to our new partnership. CD-ROM The CD-Rom project is moving forward. I have provided the first round of changes to Janet for both the CD-ROM and the cover. An updated draft of the cover will be provided at the next Alliance meeting. A re-shoot of Gary Youmans' interview will be scheduled for sometime next week. Trade Shows On behalf of the Alliance, I attended the Bio 2001 trade show in San Diego. As of this date, the Alliance has committed to the following trade shows, which I will attend: ~, Wescon, Oct. 16-18, San Jose, CA Future shows for consideration: NACORE - Real Estate Symposium, Sept. 22-25, Nashville, TN COMDEX - Computer & Technology, Nov. 12-16, Las Vegas, CA Web-site Information was obtained from Anatalio Ubalde, COO of GIS Planning dudng a conference call at the Alliance meeting in June. Points of discussion include what the Partners envision on the system, as well as the computer and information needed to perform. Anatalio will be joining us for a live presentation at our regular July Partner meeting. We will set aside time for in depth discussion and questions. Economic Profile Report I am continuing to work with Pasqual Guardado, from the Riverside office, obtaining information for the SWRC Economic Profile report. We are in the final stages of information gathering and hope to present a report at our Partner meeting on July 11th. Design and printing estimates have been obtained and a finished report should be supplied to each Partner by mid to late July. Re.qional Update Breakfast The Alliance hosted the second Regional Update Breakfast on June 20th, at Bear Creek County Club in Murrieta. Although the feedback was positive and it was an informative breakfast, it will be on the agenda for July to discuss how to increase attendance. On an ongoing basis I attend the following meetings: Manufacturer's Council Business Relations Committee EDC IEEP Partner meetings Economic Development meetings concerning the Southwest Riverside County region. If you need any additional information or have any questions, please contact me at (909) 600-6066. Sincerely, Stevie Hirdler Economic Development & Marketing Coordinator Copy: Brad Hudson Robin Zimpfer Sarah Mundy Robed Moran Teresa Gallavan INLAND EMPIRE ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP For Period: January 2001 to June 2001 I June I Cumulative I Comments 1. Corporate · Public Speaking Engagements 1 22 ' · Community Outreach 21 137 · Membership Events 3 20 · Public Policy Events 1 2 Legislative - · Committee Meetings 2 16 · Member Visits & Calls / e-mail 20 / 3 99 / 7 · Potential Member Meetings 12 64 · Potential Member Letters & Calls 85 558 · New Members 3 17 =° & Polter, Chaffey C~lege, H~T · Corporate Marketing · Mailings 0 6 · Press Releases 0 0 · Tradeshows 0: 2 · Print Advertising Placements t 11 The Business Press · Other 0 4 2. Foundation · Grants Submitted 1 7 BU · Economic Impact - Grants Received $5,500 $5,500 CA Trade & Commerce · Activities 0 1 3. Regional Marketing · Direct Mail 0 3 · Pdnt Advertising Placements 0 6 · TradeshowsJTrade Associations 1 / 0 7 / 2 BIO 2001 · Press Releases 2 4 · Professional Articles 0 1 · Media Relations 0 1 · Television 0 8 · Other 0 0 4. Economic Development · Prospect Missions 1 4 Forbes · Site Selector Outreach 2 6 · Foreign Attraction Activities 1 t Germany · Total Leads - 8 - - 45 - Lead Sources:, Magazines 6 15 · Tradeshows 0 5 · Brokers/Site Selectors 0 7 · Web 0 3 · CATAC 1 6 · Phone 1 7 · IEEP 0 2 · Total Inquiries - 3 - - 1,098 - o Inquiries/Tradeshows 0 / 0 664 / 5 Page 1 of 3 Last Revision June 4, 2001 INLAND EMPIRE ECONOM]C PARTNERSHIP For Period: January 2001 to June 2001 I June I Cumulative I Comments 4. Economic Development (cont'd) o Inquiries Print Ads 0 384 o Inquiries- misc. 3 61 · Prospects / Tradeshows 0 11 · Site Tours 0 7 · Attractions I 2 Joined a 3'~ parly Iogi~ics COnlpany o Jobs Created 0 500 · Retentions 0 1 o Jobs Retained 0 0 · Financial Investment $145,000 $24,817,000 · Relocation/Expansion Assists 0 1 · Bio Tech/High Tech o Marketing 1 6 TechNews o Professional Articles 2 2 o Inquiries 0 1 o Leads 1 0 o Other 1 16 Set-up ListServ at UCR 5. Education/Worldorce Development · School Enrichment Stnd Awards $0 $129,958 · "CallPoint" 800 line: o Employees Requested 10 90 o Training Requests 0 0 o Business Referral Requests 0 1 o Other 0 1 · Marketing o Direct Mail 0 1 o Print Advertising 0 8 Placements o Press Releases 0 2 o Television 2 12 Small Business'01 (2X:15) o Radio 2 2 KCAL & KSZZ o Tradeshows 0 4 · Other 6. SBDC · Jobs Created/Jobs Retained 25 / 15 96 / 54 · Total Economic Impact - SBDC and $1,974,054.00 $10,716,885.31 Export actions combined · Client Activity 139 1,325 · Client Hours 879.5 5,083.25 · Training EVents 14 101 · Training Hours 554 4,031.50 · Training Attendees 197 2,256, · Inland Empire Trade: o Export Actions I 11 61 Page 2 of 3 Last Revision June 4, 2001 INLAND EMPIRE ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP For Period: January 2001 to June 2001 June Cumulative Comments o Financial Impact $28,054.00 $4,459,266 · Public Speaking Engagements 0 43 Quarterly report · Outreach Activity 0 110 Quarterly report 7. Film Commission · Industry Outreach 1 10 · Requests for Locations 257 1,235 · Permits: San Bemardino/Rivemide 10 / 7 84 / 29 · Permits: BLM/US Forest Svc 16 87 · Production Days 97 839 · Filming Credits 1 I 'The Fast and the Furious" · Economic Impact $2,832,000 $23,610,100 · Total Filming Activity - 49 - - 345 - o Features 2 15 o Television 6 17 o Commercials 10 97 o Stills 23 151 o Music Videos 1 5 o Student Films 0 21 o Documentary/Industry 7 39 Videos 8. Tourism Council · Industry Outreach 1 1 1~ IETC Board meeting · Marketing Activity o E-Newsletter I 2 (Approximately: 1300+) · Tradeshows 0 6 · Non-Mailed Promotional Materials o Visitor Guides 0 3,510 o Rack Brochure 0 200 · Mailings · Visitor Guides 352 5,023 · I E Rack Brochures 2 233 · Ads 0 0 · Member Visits 1 1 · Leads 0 1,170 · New Member Prospects 1 2 · New Members 0 0 · Tourism Events 0 0 * Reflects changes made to past reports. Page 3 of 3 Last Revision June 4, 2001 wwwJeep.com INLAND EMPIRE ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP RE'AL ESTATE SUCCESSES (The IEEP reports monthly on significant mi estate b'ansactions that occun'ed with or without th? a~sistance of IEEP, in order to provide leads to our members.) ACS Industries has expanded its operations from Wbohsocket. Rhode Island to 3351 E. Philadelphia in Ontario leasing approximately 30,000 squ'are feet 'of space. The Company has entered into a thi~'d party logistics agreement with TS E~p~ress who Will Warehouse and distribute ACS Industries.products to the region! Goods manufactui~l bY ACS'Industries at their various national-and international locations,, include but are not limited to wire and woven stainless steel mesh, brooms, mops, dyes, roof insulation, automotive exhaust systems and parts for automotive a rbags 'ACS.industri,es was~'assisted~y.-the Inland Empire Economic Partner~hip.(IEEP).in the The Royal Appl ance .Manufacturmg,~Co., makers of the!Dirt Devil vacuum .cleaner and .other Royal bra.nd name cleaning products, are planning to. occupy the receptly completed 140,000 square foot Haven 'Gateway Centre distribution facility at 395! E. ~Earlstone Street'in Ontario. The five-year lease is .valued at $2.6.million. Jeff Huberman (City of Industry) and Jeff Smith (Ontario) of Lee & Associates represented the lessee and Chuck Belden of 'Cushman & Wakefield represented the lessor in this transaction. Source: Co-Star Panattoni Development Co., a Sacramento-based development fi~m, has purchased 4.5 acres of land in Chino for an undisclosed amount. Panattoni plans to .develop tWo industrial b~ildings ~otaling 97,000 square feet on the site, which.is located on Daniels Street in the 70-acre master planned Chino Industrial Commons. One of the build!rigs will total 39,000 square feet and the other, 58,000 squai'e feet. Mark Kegans of Grubb & Elli§ Company ~epresented both the buyer and seller in this transaction. - Marshall Vinyl. Windows, Inc., a Corona-based manufacturer and distributor of vinyl windows, has purchased a 127,802 square foot industrial building in.Cor~na. The'transaction was valued at $7.2 million. Marshall leased the building earlier: this year with 'an option to buy. The company has been in the facility, which is located at 235 Radio Road, since February 2001. Timothy Hawke of Grubb & Ellis Company repr.esented the buyer and the seller, Rexco LLC. Porsche Cars North America has relocated its Reno, Nevada parts distribution center to ~tWo locations one of Which'is at 4625 E. Brickell Street in Ontario. The facility that employs 23 Workers occupies 46 000 square feet of space. The facility began operations in March and is now et 100 percent reported the san Bernardino County Sun. CALENDAR ITEMS To register online for SBDC events: www.iesbdc.org July 12: A seminar entitled "SBA 8(a) Government Procurement Program" is being offered from 9 a.m. to 11 a.m. at the Inland Empire SBDC, 1157 Spruce St., Riverside. SBA assists socially or economically disadvantaged small businesses through the 8(a) program. Cost is $15. For more information contact Melanie Cote at 909.781.2345. July 17: Need Funding? "The Pre-Qualification Loan Program" seminar is being presented by Small Business Associates from 9 a.m. to 12 p.m. in Victorville. Cost is $15. For more information call 760.951.1592. July 19: Simplify your accounting with a "QuickSuccess With QuickBooks Accounting Software" (for beginners) seminar from 9 a.m. to 12 p.m. in Murdeta. An expert from Birdwell & Associates will conduct demonstrations on how to perform a vadety of functions. Cost is $25. For more information contact Melanie Cote at 909.781.2345. July 19: What you don't know can hurt you! A seminar entitled "Payroll Tax News for the New Employer'' is being presented by the Califomia Employment Development Department (EDD) from 9 a.m. to 12 p.m. in Palm Spdngs, free of charge. For more information call 760.864.1311. July 25: "Get the Tax Facts!" is a one-day IRS workshop that will provide an overview of federal and state tax issues for small businesses. An enrolled agent will present this workshop from 9 a.m. to 3 p.m. at the Inland Empire SBDC, 1157 Spruce St., Riverside, free of charge. For more information contact Melanie Cote at 909.781.2345. July 31: LTM Associates is presenting a workshop entitled "Hidng and Recruiting Employees" from 9 a.m. to 12 p.m. in Ontado. Leam how to interview properly, state and federal laws, employee manuals, insurance requirements and where to find employees. Cost is $20. For more information call 909.466.6244. August 2: What you don't know can hurt you! A seminar entitled "Payroll Tax News for the New Employer'' is being presented by the California Employment Development Department (EDD) from 9 a.m. to 3 p.m. at the Inland Empire SBDC, 1157 Spruce St., free of charge. For more information contact Melanie Cote 909.781.2345. August 7, 14, 21: "Develop Your Plan For Success", this three-week comprehensive seminar is being held from 6 p.m. to 9 p.m. at the Inland Empire SBDC, 1157 Spruce St., Riverside. Cost is $40. For more information contact Melanie Cote at 909.781.2345. WELCOME NEW MEMBERS Chaffey Community College District is a comprehensive community college located in Rancho Cucamonga, serving the additional cities of Fontana, Ontado, Upland, Montclair, Chino, and Chino Hills. Chaffey College serves more than 16,000 credit students and has 375 full-time employees. Dr. Made Pepicello, Superintendent/President, can be reached at 909.941.2100. Housing Action Resource Trust (HART) is a 501(c)(3) non-profit affordable housing and community development corporation. Frank Williams, Chairman/President, can be reached at 909.945.1574. Kite 8, Porter, Architecture provides planning and architecture for commercial, institutional, government, and residential buildings. Robert Porter, Projects Director, can be reached at 909.337.8118. Three Seuthern Califernia Startups Face-off with Venture Capitalists at the Diamend Venture Ferum Luncheon The Diamond Venture Luncheon occurred on June 13 at the Ontario Airport Marriott, presented by the Inland Empire Economic Partnership (IEEP) and the Inland Empire Small Business Development Center (SBDC). The event was sponsored by the City of Ontario, The Business Press, and Action Venture Service. The rules of engagement were as follows: a representative from each of three selected emerging companies (Intelligrade Data Systems, Moritor Inc., and MS Intergate/CyberSEATS) had ten minutes to present a summary of their business plan well enough to convince a panel of seven venture capital (VC) investors that their great idea was also a great opportunity and worthy of receiving venture capital. Following the presentation, it was the venture investors' tum to cdtique everything from the presentation skills of the presenters to the quality of their investment potential. Each venture investor was then asked to rate the presenters on a scale of one to ten. The two top scoring companies, Intelligrade Data Systems and MS Intergate/CyberSEATS, were automatically given a birth in the upcoming Diamond Venture event in October. The VC Panel consisted of a very strong group, including: Mark Breneman of Silicon Valley Bank, Glenn Mattem of Equity Link Advisors, Jeff Sykes of Gemstar Capital, Cameron Wood of Kline Hawkes LLP, Andrew Quinn of Merrill Lynch, Ashton Asencio of Consortium Capital, and John Glanville of the Athenaeum Fund. This luncheon was the first event of the annual Diamond Venture Forum, which will take place October 17, at the Mission Inn in Riverside. The forum selects up to ten finalists from as many as 20 applicants, based on the viability of each company's business plan. Between August and October, each company receives business planning and presentation training, and then continued mentodng leading up to the forum in October. The goal of the Diamond Venture Forum, according to SBDC Director Mike Stull, is to stimulate funding for entrepreneurs by enabling them to showcase their companies and their business opportunities to an audience of professional investors. "The presenting companies represent different industries, different technologies, and different views of the future," said Stull. "They share one thing in common, however, they all need venture capital to fuel their growth." The Diamond Venture Forum is open to emerging companies in the Inland Empire and greater Southern California. Although the focus is on technology start-ups, all types of companies are considered for the event. "The ultimate goal of the program is to connect companies with venture capital. To do that, we help them hone the skills they'll need to successfully present their ideas," Stull said. "1 believe the luncheon helped the three presenters learn what they need to do to make a proper presentation and may have peaked some of the VC's interest in the companies. If we accomplished any of that today, then we're succeeding," Stull said. CHECK US 9UT !!! IEEP ACTIVITY REPORT for JUNE Business Development - noted eight leads, three inquiries, two site selector outreaches and one success (ACS Industries). The Inland Empire Film Commission (IEFC) - registered 97 total days of film activity and 257 requests for locations, with ten permits issued in San Bemardino County, seven issued in Riverside County, and 16 issued for the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), for an economic impact of $2,832,000. Small Business Development Center (SBDC) - reported the creation of 25 jobs and the retention of 15 jobs for an economic impact of $1,974,054. The SBDC counseled 139 clients for 880 client hours, and conducted 14 training events for 554 training hours and 197 attendees. International Trade - reported one export action for $28,054. DON'T MISS 'Inland Empire 2025 -- Without Compromise' On October 2, at the Mission Inn in Riverside, IEEP will host its annual conference. This year it is called "inland Empire 2025 - W~hout Compromise." The focus is on the future of the Inland Empire, projecting our growth in all areas, population, jobs, education, transportation, water, and housing. Our audience will be local businesses, government, and education. Get involved in shaping the future on the Inland Empire. For more information contact Portia Besocke, IEEP's Sustainable Communities Leademhip Program Fellow at pbesocke~,ieep.com or 909.890.1090 ext. 227. TOgRISM UPDATE Check out the Toudsm Council's updated web site! Log on to IEEP.COM and click on the "inland Empire Toudsm Council" button. This site will continue to evolve and improve over time, with your guidance. Please forward any feedback regarding this site to Meredith Maloney at mmaloney@ieep.com. VIP BBEAKFAST Inland Empire executives enjoyed a fabulous Mission Inn breakfast at our VIP Breakfast June 12. An informative bdeflng about the benefRs of participating in the economic development process was followed by bdef comments from Keith Lee, (County of San Bemardino), Russ Moore (Community Bank), and Chds Atkinson (Pacific Realty Advisors) describing the value of IEEP's services and beneffis of membemhip. If you would like to invite a prospective member to the next VIP breakfast (October 16, 2001), please contact Dianna Skeens at 909.890.1090. NEW MEMBEB ORIENTATION The second quarter New Member Orientation is scheduled to take place July 25 at 8:00 a.m. in JEEP's San Bemardino office. New Member Orientation is a great opportunity to learn more about IEEP programs, activities and committees. If you are a new member and would like to attend this one-hour session, please contact Dianna Skeens at 909.890.1090. TEMECULA VALLEY FILM COUNCIL ACTIVITIES REPORT June 2001 Members of the Temecula Valley Film Council are Magg~ Allen, President; Sunny Thomas, Vice-President; Steve Phelps, Seeretary/Treasurer; Pat Martinez, Molly Mathis, Judi Staats, Eve Craig, Joe Hohenberger, Patty Slaton and Ellen Watkins The Business of the Film Council · This month we received 95 phone calls; 70 - Film Festival, 13- locations information requests, 12- council business. · The TVFC web site. www. tcmeculafllm.org has received 946 "hits" since it opened on September 4, 2000. Photo and link updates are a continuous process. · TVFC is stil receing phone inquiries from ShowBiz Expo and Locations Expo. Attending these conventions was very valuable for our exposure. · Production meetings for the Temecula Valley Film and Music "Fest 2001" are continuing on a monthly basis, which will change to every 2 weeks in July. Film and Music applications are being received daily as well as many inquiry phone calls. Sponsorship procurement is continuing. Mailings and major press releases are scheduled for mid July. · The first 3 photos have been chosen for postcard production. 13 more cameras were developed this month and a local Boy Scout troop under the direction of Shari Crall will be taking photos of historical sites in and around Temecula and will collect information about each site. These photos and the information will be compiled into collections to be presented to the Temecula Library, Temecula Valley Historical Society, City of Temecula and the Film Council where the photos will be added to our files for use in locations and postcard/calendar production. Filming in Temecula · The television/cable presentations of Temecula Students of the Month are now scheduled for July. City staff and the production advisor from Chaparral High School are meeting this summer to assure monthly presentations starting in October. This will be a student program at Chaparral High School. · Kurt Wilson of Largo Vista Productions (a ShowBiz Expo contact) attended the Balloon & Wine Festival in search of a location to film a festival sequence in his new film. He will be in contact with the TVFC and Jim Davis of Lake Skinner. As this is County property, Sheri Davis of the IEFC will handle the pemdtting. · Anthony Stevens ofB K Productions requested a courtroom setting. Photos of the local courtrooms were sent. In follow up, Riverside courts were chosen for larger more formal settings. · Executive Producer, Michelle Fisher, is filming Youth Quake, a film about Rock Bands, and requested access to the CD's being submitted to the Music Festival. Jo Moulton spoke with Ms Fisher and they will be filming live performances of the competition in Temecula during August and September. · Huell Howser of California Gold has been contacted for information on the scheduled showing of the segment filmed at the Temecula Valley Museum and at the old Erie Stanley Gardner Ranch on Pala Road. As soon as we hear from them, we we will release the dates and times. We will continue to support the daily management of filmmaker's requests, and encourage the growing awareness of the industry in this community. It is our goal to generate a higher awareness of the Temecula Area within the context of filmmaking activities, and to present the opportunities and benefits of this production to local merchants and businesses. Respectfully, Maggi Allen President, TVFC 256 Temecula winning wines. The winery, which was opened in 1978, has an informal and friendly tasting room and a shady picnic area overlooking a small lake. The winery is open for tasting 10 a.m.-5 p.m. dally. Thirteen wines are available for tasting daily and the cost is only ($1) for six samples; 50(: additional for reserve merlot and vi6gnier. Mauriee Carrie Winery (15), 34225 Rancho California Rd. (909-676-1711) few totes a beautififl showroom reminiscent of an old Victorian farmhouse. The building houses a large friendly tasting bar along with a gift and gourmet shop. Its lush grounds with a playground for kids and picnic tables offer a relaxing setting to have lunch and wine. The tast- ing bar is open 10 a~m.-5 p.m. daily and offers complimentary tastings with up to six samples. Purchases appreciated. Falkner Winery (11), 40620 Calle Contento (909-676-8231). Open for tast- ing 10 a.m.-5 p.m. daily. The cost is ($5), winch includes five tastes of white or red wines and a souvenir logo wine- glass. The winery is high on a hill with I Please call the Temecula ValleyI Chamber of Commerce (909-676-5090) for more iaformation on annual events. February ................ Temectda Rod Run February ............. Winter Barrel Tasting March ................... Bluegrass Festival April ............... Old Town Western Days May-June... U ' ' ' Arts in the Cotmtyy Festival May ................... Frontier Days Rodeo May ...........Temecula Valley W~me Auction r .................. 4th of July Celebration Jaly ....... Wineries Summer Passport Tasting July-September .... Old Town Summer Nights September ............ Concert on the Green September ......... L~ternational Film Festival October ........ Great Temecu]a Tractor Race November ............ Harvest Barrel 'Fasting December... Old-Fashioned Xmas in Old Town Monthly .............. Family-Day Programs at the Museum panoramic views of the mountains and vineyard. They have an outdoor picnic area, and host spring and summer jazz concerts, tours, weddings and private parties. Gift baskets and unique gifts are av~able at their gi~ shop. Van Roekel Vineyard & Winery (17), 34567 Rancho California Rd. (909- 699-6961). It's owned by Manrice and Budd Van Roekel and features limited premium wines. The winery is open 10 a.m.-5 p.m. dally. Tastings include five wines ($5) and a souvenir glass. Advance reservations are recommended for large groups. They also have a wide selec- tion of gourmet cheeses, deli items, wine-related gifts, a picnic area and play- ground. Wilson Creek W'mery & V'meyard (27), 35960 Rancho California Rd. (909- 699-9463). The two estate wines featured are cabernet sauvignon and chardonnay. Also popular is their famous Almand Champagne. It's open 10 a.m.-5 p.m. dally. Tastings cost ($5) and include a souvenir glass. Advance reservations are recommended for large groups. They also have picnic and play areas, as well as a gazebo and an all-enclosed 2,409. sq. ft. tent for banquets and weddings. Gift items are available here too. F'flsinger V'meyards & Winery 390S0 DePortola Rd. (909-302-6363) duces 7,000 cases annually. This winery is open 11 a.m.-4 p.m. on Fridays, 10 a.m.-5 p.m. on weekends, and by appoinl, ment on weekdays. Enjoy a relaxing feast in their indoor and outdoor picnic areas. Tastings cost ($2). Keyways W'mery (18), 37338 ttda Rd. (909-302-7888) is a fricnd inviting, warm and enjoyable place sample the wines of Temecula. wine-tasting room is filled with fin antiques. The winery, more than 3,500 cases of wine year, is open for tasting 10 a.m.-S dally. Tastings cost ($2) for Santa Margarita W'mery I Madera de Playa (909-676-4431) the valley's smallest winery. They q. cialize in aged cabernet sauvigs,, . occasionally produce fl sauvignon Itl,., or chardonnay. It's open for October-May on weekends 11 a.m.- I p.m. 2001 O~:FICIAL GUIDE CONVENTION & VISITORS BUREAU www. sandiego.org