Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
032718 CC Agenda
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (951) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II] AGENDA TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA MARCH 27, 2018 — 7:00 PM CLOSED SESSION Pursuant to Government Code Section 54953(b) Mayor Pro Tempore Mike Naggar will be teleconferencing in only for the Closed Session portion of the March 27, 2018 City Council meeting from the following location: 445 South D Street, Perris, California 92570 At approximately 9:45 P.M., the City Council will determine which of the remaining agenda items can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00 P.M. and may continue all other items on which additional time is required until a future meeting. All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 P.M. 5:30 PM - The City Council will convene in Closed Session in the Canyons Conference Room on the third floor of the Temecula City Hall concerning the following matters: CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — POTENTIAL LITIGATION. The City Council will meet in closed session with the City Attorney pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(4) with respect to one matter of potential litigation. A point has been reached where, in the opinion of the City Attorney, based on existing facts and circumstances, there is a significant exposure to litigation involving the City. Based on existing facts and circumstances, the City Council will decide whether to initiate litigation. Next in Order: Ordinance: 18-07 Resolution: 18-21 CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Matt Rahn Prelude Music: Ally Negulescu Invocation: Pastor William Rench of Calvary Baptist Church Flag Salute: Council Member Jeff Comerchero ROLL CALL: Comerchero, Edwards, Naggar, Stewart, Rahn 1 PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS Presentation of Arbor Day Proclamation Presentation of Certificates of Welcome to Dignitaries from Sister City Leidschendam- Voorburg PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 30 minutes is provided for members of the public to address the City Council on items that appear within the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda. Each speaker is limited to three minutes. If the speaker chooses to address the City Council on an item listed on the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda, a Request to Speak form may be filled out and filed with the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing Public Comments and the Consent Calendar. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the agenda, a Request to Speak form may be filed with the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Each speaker is limited to five minutes. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made at this time. A total, not to exceed, 10 minutes will be devoted to these reports. CONSENT CALENDAR NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. 1 Waive Reading of Standard Ordinances and Resolutions RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 That the City Council waive the reading of the text of all standard ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda except as specifically required by the Government Code. 2 Approve the Action Minutes of March 13, 2018 RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 That the City Council approve the City Council and Joint Meeting of the City Council/Community Services Commission action minutes of March 13, 2018. 3 Approve the List of Demands RECOMMENDATION: 2 3.1 That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 18- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A 4 Approve the City Treasurer's Report as of January 31, 2018 RECOMMENDATION 4.1 That the City Council approve and file the City Treasurer's Report as of January 31, 2018. 5 Approve an Agreement with Raceway Ford, Inc. for the Purchase of Four (4) 2018 4X4 Ford Escapes RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 That the City Council approve an Agreement with Raceway Ford, Inc., in the amount of $103,716, for the purchase of four (4) 2018 4X4 Ford Escapes. 6 Approve the Second Amendment to the Agreement with Proactive Fire Design and Consulting, Inc. for Fire Department Plan Review Service RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 That the City Council approve the Second Amendment to the Agreement with Proactive Fire Design and Consulting, Inc., in the amount of $15,000, for Fiscal Year 2017-18 for Fire Department Plan Review Service. 7 Approve a Purchase and Installation Agreement with Canon Solutions America, Inc. for the Replacement of High Volume Copy Machines RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 That the City Council approve a Purchase and Installation Agreement with Canon Solutions America, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $51,968.37, for the replacement of high volume copiers within the Support Services Division of the Information Technology and Support Services Department (ITSS). 8 Approve an Agreement with Raceway Ford, Inc. for the Purchase of a Ford F-550XL Super Duty Truck RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 That the City Council approve an Agreement with Raceway Ford, Inc., in the amount of $120,910.43, for the purchase of a Ford F-550XL Super Duty Chassis Cab and Utility Bed with Equipment. 3 9 Award a Construction Contract to PTM General Engineering Services, Inc. for the Traffic Signal Installation — Redhawk Parkway/Vail Ranch Parkway at El Chimisal Road/Tehachapi Pass, PW15-09 RECOMMENDATION: 9.1 Award a Construction Contract to PTM General Engineering Services, Inc., in the amount of $299,099, for the Traffic Signal Installation — Redhawk Parkway/ Vail Ranch Parkway at El Chimisal Road/Tehachapi Pass, PW15-09; 9.2 Authorize the City Manager to approve Contract Change Orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $29,909.90, which is equal to 10% of the contract amount; 9.3 Make a finding that the Traffic Signal Installation — Redhawk Parkway/Vail Ranch Parkway at El Chimisal Road/Tehachapi Pass project is exempt from Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) fees. 10 Adopt a Resolution and a Mitigated Negative Declaration, Approve the Plans and Specifications, and Authorize Solicitation of Construction Bids for Pechanga Parkway Widening, PW15-14 RECOMMENDATION: 10.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 18- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE PECHANGA PARKWAY WIDENING PROJECT (PW15-14) AND APPROVING THE PROJECT 10.2 Approve the Plans and Specifications, and Authorize the Department of Public Works to Solicit Construction Bids for the Pechanga Parkway Widening, PW15-14. 11 Approve the Plans and Specifications, and Authorize Solicitation of Construction Bids for Butterfield Stage Road — Phase III, PW15-11 RECOMMENDATION: 11.1 That the City Council approve the Plans and Specifications, and authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit construction bids for Butterfield Stage Road — Phase III, PW15-11. ******************** RECESS CITY COUNCIL MEETING TO SCHEDULED MEETINGS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT, THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, THE TEMECULA HOUSING AUTHORITY, AND THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY ******************** 4 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING Next in Order: Ordinance: CSD 18-01 Resolution: CSD 18-02 CALL TO ORDER: President Jeff Comerchero ROLL CALL: DIRECTORS: Edwards, Naggar, Rahn, Stewart, Comerchero CSD PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 30 minutes is provided for members of the public to address the Board of Directors on items that appear within the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda. Each speaker is limited to three minutes. If the speaker chooses to address the Board of Directors on an item listed on the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda, a Request to Speak form may be filled out and filed with the City Clerk prior to the Board of Directors addressing Public Comments and the Consent Calendar. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all Public Hearing or District Business items on the agenda, a Request to Speak form may be filed with the City Clerk prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. Each speaker is limited to five minutes. CSD CONSENT CALENDAR NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members of the Temecula Community Services District request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. 12 Approve the Action Minutes of March 13, 2018 RECOMMENDATION: 12.1 That the Board of Directors approve the action minutes of March 13, 2018. CSD DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT CSD GENERAL MANAGER REPORT CSD BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS CSD ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: Tuesday, April 10, 2018, at 5:30 PM, for a Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. 5 SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY — No Meeting TEMECULA HOUSING AUTHORITY — No Meeting TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY — No Meeting RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS 13 Community Development Department Monthly Report 14 Fire Department Monthly Report 15 Police Department Monthly Report 16 Public Works Department Monthly Report COMMISSION REPORTS PUBLIC SAFETY REPORT CITY MANAGER REPORT CITY ATTORNEY REPORT ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: Tuesday, April 10, 2018, at 5:30 PM, for a Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. Adjourned in Memory of Jack Williams *** NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC The agenda packet (including staff reports and public Closed Session information) will be available for public viewing in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula) after 4:00 PM the Friday before the City Council meeting. At that time, the agenda packet may also be accessed on the City's website — TemeculaCA.gov — and will be available for public viewing at the respective meeting. Supplemental material received after the posting of the Agenda Any supplemental material distributed to a majority of the City Council regarding any item on the agenda, after the posting of the agenda, will be available for public viewing in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula, 8:00 AM — 5:00 PM). In addition, such material will be made available on the City's website — TemeculaCA.gov — and will be available for public review at the respective meeting. If you have questions regarding any item on the agenda for this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's Department, (951) 694-6444. 6 PRESENTATIONS The City of Temecula PROCLAMA TION WHEREAS, in 1872, J. Sterling Morton proposed to the Nebraska Board of Agriculture that a special day be set aside for the planting of trees; and WHEREAS, this holiday, called Arbor Day, was first observed with the planting of more than a million trees in Nebraska; and WHEREAS, Arbor Day is now observed throughout the nation and the world; and WHEREAS, trees can reduce the erosion of our precious topsoil by wind and water, cut heating and cooling costs, moderate the temperature, clean the air, produce life-giving oxygen, and provide habitat for wild life; and WHEREAS, trees are a renewable resource giving us paper, wood for our homes, fuel for our fires and countless other wood products; and WHEREAS, trees in our city increase property values, enhance the economic vitality of business areas, and beautify our community; and WHEREAS, trees, wherever they are planted, are a source of joy and spiritual renewal. NOW, THEREFORE, I, Mayor Matt Rahn, on behalf of the City Council of the City of Temecula, hereby proclaim March 31, 2018, to be "Arbor Day" in the City of Temecula, and urge all citizens to celebrate Arbor Day and support efforts to protect our trees, woodlands, and urban forests, and to plant trees to gladden the heart and promote the well-being of this and future generations. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City of Temecula to be affixed this twenty-seventh day of March, 2018. Matt Rahn, Mayor Randi Johl City Clerk CITY COUNCIL CONSENT Item No. 1 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager Por- Jek 6ft CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Randi Johl, City Clerk DATE: March 27, 2018 SUBJECT: Waive Reading of Standard Ordinances and Resolutions PREPARED BY: Randi Johl, City Clerk RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council waive the reading of the text of all standard ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda except as specifically required by the Government Code. BACKGROUND: The City of Temecula is a general law city formed under the laws of the State of California. With respect to adoption of ordinances and resolutions, the City adheres to the requirements set forth in the Government Code. Unless otherwise required, the full reading of the text of standard ordinances and resolutions is waived. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: None Item No. 2 ACTION MINUTES TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA MARCH 13, 2018 — 7:00 PM No Closed Session At 7:00 PM Mayor Rahn called the City Council meeting to order to consider the matters described on the agenda. CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Matt Rahn Prelude Music: Chaparral High School Spring Musical "Young Frankenstein" Invocation: Aaron Adams Flag Salute: Council Member James "Stew" Stewart National Anthem: Liam Naggar ROLL CALL: Comerchero, Edwards, Naggar, Stewart, Rahn PUBLIC COMMENTS The following individual addressed the City Council on non -agenda items: • Mark Katan CITY COUNCIL REPORTS CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Waive Reading of Standard Ordinances and Resolutions - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0); Motion by Edwards, Second by Comerchero; and electronic vote reflected approval by Comerchero, Edwards, Naggar, Stewart and Rahn. RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 That the City Council waive the reading of the text of all standard ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda except as specifically required by the Government Code. 2 Approve the Action Minutes of February 27, 2018 - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0); Motion by Edwards, Second by Comerchero; and electronic vote reflected approval by Comerchero, Edwards, Naggar, Stewart and Rahn. Action Minutes 031318 1 RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 That the City Council approve the City Council action minutes, Joint City Council/Community Services District, and Joint Meeting of the City Council and Public/Traffic Safety Commission action minutes of February 27, 2018. 3 Approve the List of Demands - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0); Motion by Edwards, Second by Comerchero; and electronic vote reflected approval by Comerchero, Edwards, Naggar, Stewart and Rahn. RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 18-17 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A 4 Adopt Ordinance 18-06 Amending Section 17.04.020 of the Temecula Municipal Code Regarding Temporary Use Permits and Adding a New Chapter 17.42 Collection Containers, Establishing Permitting, Operational Requirements and Procedures for Enforcement (Long Range Planning Application Number LR17-1180) (Second Reading) - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0); Motion by Edwards, Second by Comerchero; and electronic vote reflected approval by Comerchero, Edwards, Naggar, Stewart and Rahn. RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 That the City Council adopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 18-06 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING SECTION 17.04.020 "TEMPORARY USE PERMITS" AND ADDING A NEW CHAPTER 17.42 "COLLECTION CONTAINERS" TO TITLE 17 "ZONING" OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE AND FINDING THE ORDINANCE IS EXEMPT PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15061(B)(3) 5 Approve a Sponsorship Agreement with Trauma Intervention Program of Southwest Riverside County, Inc. for Traumatic Incident Citizen Support - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0); Motion by Edwards, Second by Comerchero; and electronic vote reflected approval by Comerchero, Edwards, Naggar, Stewart and Rahn. RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 That the City Council approve a Sponsorship Agreement with Trauma Intervention Program of Southwest Riverside County, Inc., in the amount of $10,000, for Traumatic Incident Citizen Support. Action Minutes 031318 2 6 Approve an Agreement for Consultant Services with Fehr & Peers, Inc., for the Old Town Parking Management Plan Update - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0); Motion by Edwards, Second by Comerchero; and electronic vote reflected approval by Comerchero, Edwards, Naggar, Stewart and Rahn. RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 That the City Council approve an Agreement for Consultant Services with Fehr & Peers, Inc., in the amount of $72,809, with a 10% contingency of $7,280, for a total agreement amount of $80,089, for the Old Town Parking Management Plan Update. 7 Amend the Capital Improvement Program Budget for Fiscal Years 2018-22 to Accelerate Funding for Medians and Ornamental Barriers — Citywide, from Fiscal Year 2018-19 to Fiscal Year 2017-18 - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0); Motion by Naggar, Second by Edwards; and electronic vote reflected approval by Comerchero, Edwards, Naggar, Stewart and Rahn. Motion to approve with additional direction to have detailed review of pedestrian crossing solutions by the Public/Traffic Safety Commission before the item returns to Council for final approval. RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 18-18 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, TO AMEND THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEARS 2018-22 TO ACCELERATE FUNDING FOR MEDIANS AND ORNAMENTAL BARRIERS CITYWIDE, FROM FISCAL YEAR 2018-19 TO FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 8 Amend the Capital Improvement Program Budget for Fiscal Years 2018-22 to Accelerate Funding for Sidewalks — Citywide, from Fiscal Year 2018-19 to Fiscal Year 2017-18 and Award a Construction Contract to Eagle Paving Company, Inc. for Sidewalks — Old Town Improvement Project (Mercedes Street from Fourth Street to Sam Hicks Monument Park), PW17-04 - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0); Motion by Edwards, Second by Comerchero; and electronic vote reflected approval by Comerchero, Edwards, Naggar, Stewart and Rahn. RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 18-19 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, TO AMEND THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEARS 2018-22 TO ACCELERATE FUNDING FOR SIDEWALKS — CITYWIDE, FROM FISCAL YEAR 2018-19 TO FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 Action Minutes 031318 3 8.2 Approve an additional appropriation of $400,000 from the Sidewalks — Citywide project to the Sidewalks — Old Town Improvement Project (Mercedes Street from Fourth Street to Sam Hicks Monument Park); 8.3 Award a Construction Contract to Eagle Paving Company, Inc., in the amount of $477,577, for Sidewalks — Old Town Improvement Project (Mercedes Street from Fourth Street to Sam Hicks Monument Park), PW17-04; 8.4 Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $47,757.70, which is equal to 10% of the Contract amount; 8.5 Make a finding that the Sidewalks — Old Town Improvement Project (Mercedes Street from Fourth Street to Sam Hicks Monument Park), PW 17-04, is exempt from Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) fees. 9 Amend the Capital Improvement Program Budget for Fiscal Years 2018-22 to Accelerate Funding from Sidewalks — Citywide, from Fiscal Year 2018-19 to Fiscal Year 2017-18 and Award a Construction Contract to Eagle Paving Company, Inc. for Sidewalks — Sixth Street Improvements, PW17-05 - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0); Motion by Edwards, Second by Comerchero; and electronic vote reflected approval by Comerchero, Edwards, Naggar, Stewart and Rahn. RECOMMENDATION: 9.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 18-20 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, TO AMEND THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEARS 2018-22 TO ACCELERATE FUNDING FOR SIDEWALKS — CITYWIDE, FROM FISCAL YEAR 2018-19 TO FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 9.2 Approve an additional appropriation of $100,000 from the Sidewalks — Citywide project to the Sidewalks — Sixth Street Improvements; 9.3 Award a Construction Contract to Eagle Paving Company, Inc., in the amount of $150,595, for Sidewalks — Sixth Street Improvements, PW 17-05; 9.4 Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $15,059.50, which is equal to 10% of the Contract amount; 9.5 Make a finding that Sidewalks — Sixth Street Improvements, PW 17-05, is exempt from Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) fees. 10 Award a Construction Contract to CT & T Concrete Paving, Inc. for Sidewalks — Ynez Road, PW17-22 - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0); Motion by Edwards, Second by Comerchero; and electronic vote reflected approval by Comerchero, Edwards, Naggar, Stewart and Rahn. Action Minutes 031318 4 RECOMMENDATION: 10.1 Award a Construction Contract to CT & T Concrete Paving, Inc., in the amount of $48,112.50, for Sidewalks — Ynez Road (Winchester Road to County Center Drive), PW 17-22; 10.2 Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $4,811.25, which is equal to 10% of the Contract amount. 11 Award a Construction Contract to Aramexx Group, Inc. for the Fallen Heroes Memorial, PW17-07 - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0); Motion by Edwards, Second by Comerchero; and electronic vote reflected approval by Comerchero, Edwards, Naggar, Stewart and Rahn. RECOMMENDATION: 11.1 Approve an appropriation of $75,000 from the Public Art Fund to the Fallen Heroes Memorial, PW17-07; 11.2 Award a Construction Contract to Aramexx Group, Inc., in the amount of $153,485, for the Fallen Heroes Memorial, PW17-07; 11.3 Authorize the City Manager to approve Contract Change Orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $15,348.50, which is equal to 10% of the contract amount; 11.4 Make a finding that the Fallen Heroes Memorial project is exempt from Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) fees. 12 Approve the First Amendment to the Purchase and Installation Agreement with Miracle Recreation Equipment Company for Vail Ranch Park Playground Equipment Replacement, PW17-10 - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0); Motion by Edwards, Second by Comerchero; and electronic vote reflected approval by Comerchero, Edwards, Naggar, Stewart and Rahn. RECOMMENDATION: 12.1 That the City Council approve the First Amendment to the Purchase and Installation Agreement with Miracle Recreation Equipment Company for additional services for the Vail Ranch Park Playground Equipment Replacement Project. 13 Approve the First Amendment to Agreement with Mike's Precision Welding, Inc. for Welding Maintenance Services - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0); Motion by Edwards, Second by Comerchero; and electronic vote reflected approval by Comerchero, Edwards, Naggar, Stewart and Rahn. RECOMMENDATION: 13.1 That the City Council approve the First Amendment to the Agreement with Mike's Precision Welding, Inc., in the amount of $70,000, for a total agreement of $100,000, and extend the terms to June 30, 2020. Action Minutes 031318 5 14 Accept Improvements and File the Notice of Completion for the Old Town Sidewalk Improvement Project, PW 15-06 - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0); Motion by Edwards, Second by Comerchero; and electronic vote reflected approval by Comerchero, Edwards, Naggar, Stewart and Rahn. RECOMMENDATION: 14.1 Accept the improvements for the Old Town Sidewalk Improvement Project, PW15-06, as complete; 14.2 Direct the City Clerk to file and record the Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a one-year Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the Contract amount; 14.3 Release the Labor and Materials Bond seven months after filing the Notice of Completion, if no liens have been filed. RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL JOINT MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Matt Rahn ROLL CALL: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Comerchero, Edwards, Naggar, Stewart, Rahn COMMISSIONERS: Borgeson, Levine, Nelson, Schwank, Willis 16 Conduct Annual Joint Meeting Between the City Council and the Community Services Commission — Receive and file. RECOMMENDATION: 16.1 That the City Council conduct the annual joint meeting between the City Council and the Community Services Commission. ADJOURNMENT OF JOINT MEETING COMMISSION REPORTS PUBLIC SAFETY REPORT CITY MANAGER REPORT CITY ATTORNEY REPORT Action Minutes 031318 6 ADJOURNMENT At 8:13 PM, the City Council meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, March 13, 2018, at 5:30 PM for Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. Matt Rahn, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] Action Minutes 031318 7 Item No. 3 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Jennifer Hennessy, Director of Finance DATE: March 27, 2018 SUBJECT: Approve the List of Demands PREPARED BY: Pascale Brown, Fiscal Services Manager Jada Shafe, Accounting Technician II RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 18- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A BACKGROUND: All claims and demands are reported and summarized for review and approval by the City Council on a routine basis at each City Council meeting. The attached claims represent the paid claims and demands since the last City Council meeting. FISCAL IMPACT: All claims and demands were paid from appropriated funds or authorized resources of the City and have been recorded in accordance with the City's policies and procedures. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution 2. List of Demands RESOLUTION NO. 18- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A, on file in the office of the City Clerk, has been reviewed by the City Manager's Office and that the same are hereby allowed in the amount of $4,951,641.77. Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 27th day of March, 2018. Matt Rahn, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF TEMECULA ss I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 18- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 27th day of March, 2018, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl, City Clerk CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS 03/01/2018 TOTAL CHECK RUN: $ 3,287,675.57 03/08/2018 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 1,143,614.99 03/08/2018 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN: 520,351.21 TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 03/27/2018 COUNCIL MEETING: $ 4,951,641.77 DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND: CHECKS: CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS 001 GENERAL FUND 125 PEG PUBLIC EDUCATION & GOVERNMENT 140 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT 165 AFFORDABLE HOUSING 190 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B STREET LIGHTS 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D REFUSE RECYCLING 196 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "L" LAKE PARK MAINT. 197 TEMECULA LIBRARY FUND 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS FUND 300 INSURANCE FUND 305 WORKERS' COMPENSATION 320 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 330 CENTRAL SERVICES 340 FACILITIES 395 2011 FINANCING LEASE CIVIC CENTER & CRC 472 CFD 01-2 HARVESTON A&B DEBT SERVICE 473 CFD 03-1 CROWNE HILL DEBT SERVICE FUND 474 AD03-4 JOHN WARNER ROAD DEBT SERVICE 475 CFD03-3 WOLF CREEK DEBT SERVICE FUND 476 CFD 03-6 HARVESTON 2 DEBT SERVICE FUND 477 CFD 03-02 RORIPAUGH DEBT SERVICE FUND 478 CFD 16-01 RORIPAUGH PHASE II 501 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 1 SADDLEWOOD 502 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 2 WINCHESTER CREEK 503 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 3 RANCHO HIGHLANDS 504 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 4 THE VINEYARDS 505 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 5 SIGNET SERIES 506 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 6 WOODCREST COUNTRY 507 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 7 RIDGEVIEW 508 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 8 VILLAGE GROVE 509 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 9 RANCHO SOLANA 510 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 10 MARTINIQUE 511 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 11 MEADOWVIEW 512 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 12 VINTAGE HILLS 513 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 13 PRESLEY DEVELOP. 514 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 14 MORRISON HOMES 515 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 15 BARCLAY ESTATES 516 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 16 TRADEWINDS 517 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 17 MONTE VISTA 518 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 18 TEMEKU HILLS 519 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 19 CHANTEMAR 520 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 20 CROWNE HILL 521 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 21 VAIL RANCH 522 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 22 SUTTON PLACE 523 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 23 PHEASENT RUN 524 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 24 HARVESTON 525 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 25 SERENAHILLS 526 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 26 GALLERYTRADITION 527 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 27 AVONDALE 528 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 28 WOLF CREEK 529 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 29 GALLERY PORTRAIT 700 CERBT CALIFORNIA EE RETIREE-GASB45 $ 2,666,261.18 80.00 21,366.14 21,340.08 270,310.17 369.12 1,884.36 4,001.05 10,753.18 728,934.92 2,998.20 4,078.22 59,910.83 19,070.43 45,390.11 534,959.38 68.60 68.60 68.60 68.60 68.60 68.60 342.70 264.93 314.48 36.62 67.53 502.72 191.96 224.63 352.05 71.97 207.97 43.64 153.06 32.64 313.15 95.00 44.50 40.60 846.59 177.79 12,230.64 348.24 45.25 9.18 195.93 485.51 1.62 188.34 12,294.84 3.51 9,044.00 $ 4,431,290.56 CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS 001 GENERAL FUND $ 284,592.40 140 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT 427.85 165 AFFORDABLE HOUSING 3,136.27 190 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 128,646.55 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B STREET LIGHTS 334.99 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D REFUSE RECYCLING 2,413.70 196 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "L" LAKE PARK MAINT. 363.95 197 TEMECULA LIBRARY FUND 1,778.84 300 INSURANCE FUND 993.89 305 WORKERS' COMPENSATION 1,966.52 320 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 30,064.18 330 CENTRAL SERVICES 4,003.73 340 FACILITIES 7,928.01 472 CFD 01-2 HARVESTON A&B DEBT SERVICE 40.62 473 CFD 03-1 CROWNE HILL DEBT SERVICE FUND 40.62 474 AD03-4 JOHN WARNER ROAD DEBT SERVICE 40.62 475 CFD03-3 WOLF CREEK DEBT SERVICE FUND 40.62 476 CFD 03-6 HARVESTON 2 DEBT SERVICE FUND 40.62 477 CFD 03-02 RORIPAUGH DEBT SERVICE FUND 40.62 478 CFD 16-01 RORIPAUGH PHASE II 203.30 501 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 1 SADDLEWOOD 27.96 502 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 2 WINCHESTER CREEK 44.93 503 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 3 RANCHO HIGHLANDS 38.23 504 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 4 THE VINEYARDS 5.55 505 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 5 SIGNET SERIES 63.54 506 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 6 WOODCREST COUNTRY 10.04 507 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 7 RIDGEVIEW 11.27 508 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 8 VILLAGE GROVE 211.78 509 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 9 RANCHO SOLANA 1.99 510 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 10 MARTINIQUE 9.19 511 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 11 MEADOWVIEW 3.32 512 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 12 VINTAGE HILLS 122.26 513 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 13 PRESLEY DEVELOP. 26.11 514 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 14 MORRISON HOMES 9.46 515 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 15 BARCLAY ESTATES 7.75 516 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 16 TRADEWINDS 30.60 517 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 17 MONTE VISTA 1.06 518 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 18 TEMEKU HILLS 113.45 519 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 19 CHANTEMAR 60.55 520 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 20 CROWNE HILL 169.21 521 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 21 VAIL RANCH 278.07 522 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 22 SUTTON PLACE 4.18 523 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 23 PHEASENT RUN 7.27 524 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 24 HARVESTON 156.48 525 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 25 SERENA HILLS 50.25 526 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 26 GALLERYTRADITION 1.46 527 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 27 AVONDALE 7.27 528 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 28 WOLF CREEK 239.93 529 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 29 GALLERY PORTRAIT 2.66 700 CERBT CALIFORNIA EE RETIREE-GASB45 51,537.49 520,351.21 TOTAL BY FUND: $ 4,951,641.77 apChkLst 03/01/2018 11: 45: 50A M Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 1 Bank : union UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor 3686 02/09/2018 006887 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA 020495 NORTERN CALIFORNIA CHAPTER, INT'L PUBLIC MGMT NCCIPMA 007044 CLAIM JUMPER RESTAURANT 019506 EVERNOTE CORPORATION 020497 YOURMEMBERSHIP.COM 000203 JOBS AVAILABLE INC 008707 BOXWOOD TECHNOLOGY INC 009623 PUBLIC AGENCY RISK MANAGERS 020498 ALLIANCE FOR INNOVATION 008668 WES FLOWERS 009612 BJ'S RESTAURANTS, INC. Description Amount Paid Check Total IG REGISTRATION CONFERENCE: GARIBAY, I. IG RFRSHMNTS: EXEC ASSIST. INTERVIEW IG ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTION FOR: GARIBAY, I. IG JOB ADVERTISEMENT: ASSOC. ENGINEER IG JOB ADVERTISEMENT: SR CIVIL ENGINEER IG JOB ADVERTISEMENT: ASSOCIATE ENGINEER IG CONFERENCE REGISTRATION: CARDENAS, R. IG WORKSHOP REGISTRATION: GARIBAY, I. IG SUNSHINE FUND IG RFRSHMNTS: ADMIN ASSIST INTERVIEW 429.00 64.15 42.00 199.00 390.00 320.00 450.00 139.00 61.43 54.40 2,148.98 Pagel apChkLst Final Check List 03/01/2018 11:45:50AM CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 2 Bank : union UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor 3697 02/14/2018 006887 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Description Amount Paid Check Total 000152 CALIF PARKS & RECREATION KH CONF & EXPO REGIST: 475.00 SOC LAWRENCE, J. 000152 CALIF PARKS & RECREATION KH CONF & EXPO REGIST: HAWKINS, 475.00 SOC K. 000152 CALIF PARKS & RECREATION KH CONF & EXPO REGIST: SISLER, 475.00 SOC LACY 006952 PAYPAL KH VERISIGN PAYFLOW PRO 236.90 TRANSACTION 020249 LAUND3R.COM LLC KH TABLE CLOTH LAUNDRY: 153.50 CONFERENCE CTR 000152 CALIF PARKS & RECREATION KH AGENCY MEMBERSHIP: HAWKINS, 475.00 SOC K. 012126 BOWERS MUSEUM KH TICKETS: SENIOR EXCURSION: 216.00 MPSC 020499 CONTAINERSTORE.COM KH OFFICE SUPPLIES 90.16 000152 CALIF PARKS & RECREATION KH MEMBERSHIP REGISTRATION: 145.00 SOC WILLCOX, J. 000152 CALIF PARKS & RECREATION KH MEMBERSHIP REGISTRATION: 145.00 SOC MOREY, M. 004822 RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY KH DIAL RIDE VOUCHERS: MPSC 300.00 007051 RALPHS KH RFRSHMNTS: MOZART 79.90 CELEBRATION 000152 CALIF PARKS & RECREATION KH MEMBERSHIP FEES: HAWKINS, K. 480.00 SOC 001365 RIVERSIDE, COUNTY OF, KH HEALTH PERMIT: ROD RUN 428.00 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH VENDORS DEPT 001365 RIVERSIDE, COUNTY OF, KH HEALTH PERMIT: ROD RUN 10.14 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH VENDORS DEPT 000152 CALIF PARKS & RECREATION KH CONF & EXPO REGIST: ADAMIAK, 250.00 SOC D. 000152 CALIF PARKS & RECREATION KH CONF & EXPO REGIST: 250.00 SOC AUGUSTINE, W. 000152 CALIF PARKS & RECREATION KH MEMBERSHIP REGISTRATION: 145.00 SOC WOOTEN, M. 000152 CALIF PARKS & RECREATION KH CONF & EXPO REGIST: RUSSO, E. 475.00 SOC 000152 CALIF PARKS & RECREATION KH CONF & EXPO REGIST: GILLILAND, 475.00 SOC R. 000152 CALIF PARKS & RECREATION KH CONF & EXPO REGIST: WILLCOX, 475.00 SOC G. 000152 CALIF PARKS & RECREATION KH CONF & EXPO REGIST: WILLCOX, 475.00 SOC J. 014583 PALUMBO'S RISTORANTE, LLC KH RFSHMNTS: MTG WITH HOMELESS 93.06 OUTREACH Page2 apChkLst 03/01/2018 11:45:50AM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 3 Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor 019825 GETTY IMAGES 000152 CALIF PARKS & RECREATION SOC 000152 CALIF PARKS & RECREATION SOC 000152 CALIF PARKS & RECREATION SOC 000152 CALIF PARKS & RECREATION SOC 000152 CALIF PARKS & RECREATION SOC 000152 CALIF PARKS & RECREATION SOC 019751 STRYDER TRANSPORTATION 3698 02/27/2018 007282 AMAZON.COM, INC 3702 02/22/2018 006887 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA 000912 CITY CLERKS ASSN OF CALIF 020024 THE BRIDGE ON THIRD 000501 INTL INSTITUTE OF MUNICIPAL 000912 CITY CLERKS ASSN OF CALIF 000912 CITY CLERKS ASSN OF CALIF 3704 02/22/2018 006887 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA 020444 MEETINGSIFT.COM 013338 APPLE STORE 002377 BEST BUY COMPANY INC 018457 THYCOTIC SOFTWARE, LLC 008956 PANERA BREAD 019588 VERIATO, INC. 008956 PANERA BREAD 013851 STORM SOURCE, LLC 015112 ENVATO.COM 3705 02/28/2018 007282 AMAZON.COM, INC Description Amount Paid Check Total KH IMAGES FOR PROMOTIONAL FLYERS KH MEMBERSHIP REGISTRATION: LAWRENCE, J. KH MEMBERSHIP REGISTRATION: SISLER, L. KH MEMBERSHIP REGISTRATION: GILLILAND, KH MEMBERSHIP REGISTRATION: ADAMIAK, D. KH MEMBERSHIP REGISTRATION: AUGUSTINE, KH MEMBERSHIP REGISTRATION: WILLCOX, G. KH TRANSPORTATION: SENIOR EXCURSION SUPPLIES:HUMAN SERVICES SUPPLIES:HUMAN SERVICES ROATHENIAN DIALOGUE: JOHL2/16/18 RO RFRSHMNTS: CITY CNCL CLOSED SESSION RO MEMBERSHIP DUES: RAMIREZ, E. RO ATHENIAN DIALOGUE: JOH L 3/23/18 ROATHENIAN DIALOGUE: JOHL4/6/18 MH MONTHLY RENEWAL FEES MH APPLECARE WARRANTY: IT & CMO MH TV & BLUE RAY: IWTCM MH SERVER PASSWORD MANAGEMENT MH RFSHMNTS: ASSET MGMT WORKSHOP MH MONITORING SOFTWARE MH RFSHMNTS: ASSET MGMT WORKSHOP MH APPOINTMENT PLUS:IT MH DIGITAL ASSETS PURCHASE SUPPLIES: WORKFORCE 149.00 145.00 145.00 145.00 145.00 145.00 145.00 836.00 27.76 64.68 75.00 184.88 100.00 75.00 75.00 149.00 232.00 448.75 984.90 103.97 162.00 15.99 40.00 80.00 140.48 8,677.66 92.44 509.88 2,216.61 140.48 Page:3 apChkLst Final Check List 03/01/2018 11:45:50AM CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 4 Bank : union UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Description Amount Paid Check Total 3706 03/01/2018 014685 COMPASS BANK '11 REFUNDING 01/08 CERT PART DEBT SVC 187719 03/01/2018 016764 ABM BUILDING SERVICES LLC HVAC MAINT: OTC 534,959.38 534,959.38 208.78 208.78 187720 03/01/2018 001517 AETNA BEHAVIORAL HEALTH BILLING ADJ/ADDING 1 MEMBER FOR 4.40 LLC, DBAAETNA RESOURCES MARCH FOR L MAR EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PRGM 187721 03/01/2018 015217 AIRGAS INC., DBA AIRGAS GAS FOR DRY ICE USA LLC EXPERIMENTS:PPW 187722 03/01/2018 003951 ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT PAVEMENT REHAB MARGARITA RD; P W 12-11 CREDIT: CHANGE ORDER NOTAUTHORI ASPHALT PRODUCTS: CITYWIDE 668.80 673.20 4.13 4.13 191,681.50 -3,814.25 635.06 188,502.31 187723 03/01/2018 009787 ALTEC INDUSTRIES INC REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE - TRAFFIC 493.50 & MAINT REPAIR & MAINT: TRAFFIC AND MAINT B 935.50 1,429.00 187724 03/01/2018 005037 AMERICAN ASPHALT SOUTH NOV RESIDENTIAL SLURRY SEAL: PW 168,468.33 168,468.33 INC 17-03 187725 03/01/2018 004240 AMERICAN FORENSIC NURSES PHLEBOTOMY SRVCS:TEMECULA 690.00 (AFN) POLICE PHLEBOTOMY SRVCS:TEMECULA POLIC 225.00 187726 03/01/2018 002187 ANIMAL FRIENDS OF THE DEC ANIMAL CONTROL SRVCS:CITY 10,000.00 VALLEYS OF TEMECUL 187727 03/01/2018 017149 BGP RECREATION INC 187728 03/01/2018 011954 BAKER & TAYLOR INC TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS BOOK COLLECTIONS:LIBRARY BOOK COLLECTIONS:LIBRARY BOOK COLLECTIONS:LIBRARY BOOK COLLECTIONS:LIBRARY BOOK COLLECTIONS:LIBRARY BOOK COLLECTIONS:LIBRARY BOOK COLLECTIONS:LIBRARY 187729 03/01/2018 018101 BARN STAGE COMPANY INC, STTLMNT:CABARETATTHE MERC: THE 02/25/18 187730 03/01/2018 013482 BAS SECURITY SECURITY SERVICES:TCSD FACILITIES SECURITY SERVICES:TCSD FACILITIES 2,872.80 2,793.00 3,830.40 137.20 38.95 145.53 7.24 33.77 66.43 15.29 425.63 915.00 10,000.00 9,633.40 732.84 693.00 693.00 1,161.00 805.50 1,966.50 Page:4 apChkLst Final Check List 03/01/2018 11:45:50AM CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 5 Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 187731 03/01/2018 007385 BAUDVILLE INC VISITOR LOGIN BOOKS:FRONT RECEPTION 187732 03/01/2018 020508 BOHN, SHERRILL BALANCE ADJ FOR VIOLATION DISMISSAL 187733 03/01/2018 008605 BONTERRA PSOMAS 11/24-12/31 ENVIRO MITIGATION SVCS: FVP 187734 03/01/2018 010469 BOZONELOS, ROBERT MUSICAL PERF: 3/9/18 187735 03/01/2018 010939 CALIF DEPT OF INDUSTRIAL 115265 CONVEYOR INSPECTION: MERCEDES 187736 03/01/2018 001267 CALIF DEPT OF MOTOR 2018 CA VEHICLE CODE BOOKS VEHICLES 187737 03/01/2018 020083 CALIFORNIA SCULPTURE ARTWORK PURCHASE:FALLEN ACADEMY HEROES MEMORIAL 187738 03/01/2018 000131 CARL WARREN & COMPANY CLAIM ADJUSTER SERVICES 2,058.00 2,058.00 INC 187739 03/01/2018 008534 CASTILLO, RYAN EE COMPUTER PURCHASE PRGM 2,000.00 2,000.00 421.88 421.88 305.00 305.00 4,933.40 4,933.40 200.00 200.00 225.00 225.00 388.21 388.21 3,000.00 3,000.00 187740 03/01/2018 004462 CDW LLC, DBA CDW PHONE HEADSET - CITY CLERK'S 291.58 291.58 GOVERNMENT LLC DEPT. 187741 03/01/2018 007062 CLARITAS HOLDINGS INC ECON DEV: CITY'S DEMOGRAPHIC 1,002.00 1,002.00 SNAPSHOT 187742 03/01/2018 000442 COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS JAN -MAR ALARM SYS 5,820.00 MONITORING:VAR FACILIT SERVICE CALL: CHAPEL/MUSEUM 75.00 5,895.00 187743 03/01/2018 017120 CONSTRUCTION EXAM COMBO LEGAL & MGMT MODULES 850.00 850.00 CENTER 187744 03/01/2018 012353 CONSTRUCTION TESTING, & ENGINEERING INC DEC INSPECT SVCS MARGARITA RD: PW12-11 187745 03/01/2018 013379 COSSOU, CELINE TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 187746 03/01/2018 004329 COSTCOTEMECULA#491 SUPPLIES:CRC EVENTS 2,576.00 2,576.00 495.60 495.60 154.11 154.11 Page:5 apChkLst Final Check List 03/01/2018 11:45:50AM CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 6 Bank : union UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Description Amount Paid Check Total 187747 03/01/2018 014501 COUNTYWIDE MECHANICAL HVAC REPAIR SERVICE: CIVIC SYSTEMS CENTER 187748 03/01/2018 020436 CRONBERG, RICHARD N TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 748.75 748.75 308.00 308.00 187749 03/01/2018 000209 CROP PRODUCTION SERVICES REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE: STA 73 119.52 REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE: STA 73 104.38 223.90 187750 03/01/2018 014580 DANCE THEATRE COLLECTIVE TIX SALES: DANCEXCHANGE 2/20/018 38.50 THEATER PERFORMANCE: MARCH 16-1; 187751 03/01/2018 004285 DAVE BANG & ASSOCIATES TABLES & BENCHES: HARVESTON INC LAKE PK 187752 03/01/2018 008289 DAVIS, MELISSA 187753 03/01/2018 003945 DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL SRVCS 5,000.00 5,038.50 1,995 70 1,995 70 REIMB: AOAP CONF - 2/4/18 - 02/07/18 1,195.73 REIMB: AOAP CONF 2/5-2/9/17 PORTABLE RESTROOM RENTALS: VAIL RANCH PA PORTABLE RESTROOM RENTALS: LASE PORTABLE RESTROOM RENTALS: RIVEF PORTABLE RESTROOM RENTALS: LONG TEMPORARY FENCING: MARGARITA SPI 115.32 1,311.05 55.88 55.88 55.88 55.88 913.77 187754 03/01/2018 004192 DOWNS ENERGY FUEL & FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: POLICE 55.10 LUBRICANTS DEPT FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: PUBLIC WOF 322.31 187755 03/01/2018 002390 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER JAN WATER METER:39656 DIEGO DR 85.68 DIST JAN WATER METER:39569 SERAPHINA R JAN WATER METER:MURR HOT SPRING: JAN WATER METER:MURR HOT SPRING: 187756 03/01/2018 018098 ELITE CLAIMS MANAGEMENT, MAR 18 3RD PARTY CLAIM ADMIN: INC WRKRS COM 187757 03/01/2018 004111 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT 2017 QUARTERLY: ECON DEV DEPT 187758 03/01/2018 015090 EVAPCO PRODUCTS INC FEB CONDENSER H2O SYS MAINT: CIVIC CTR 187759 03/01/2018 019016 FLEETCREW, INC., DBA:FLEETCREW 187760 03/01/2018 018954 FLINT TRADING, INC 179.16 22.12 20.12 1,137.29 377.41 307.08 1,250.00 1,250.00 161.00 161.00 583.50 583.50 DIESEL PARTICULATE FILTER SVCS: 409.95 PW DIESEL PARTICULATE FILTER SVCS: PW 534.95 TRAFFIC PAINT: PW STREET MAINT 4,352.74 187761 03/01/2018 016436 FRICK, TRACY REIMB: PARENTS POSTER HANGING & 944.90 4,352.74 351.62 351.62 Pages apChkLst Final Check List 03101/2018 11:45:50AM CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 7 Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 187762 03/01/2018 018858 FRONTIER CALIFORNIA INC FEB INTERNET SVCS:41000 MAIN ST 4,875.22 FEB INTERNET SVCS:SENIOR CENTER 146.98 FEB INTERNET SVCS:FIRE STN 73 117.84 FEB INTERNET SVCS:LIBRARY 186.98 FEB INTERNET SVCS:41000 MAIN ST 2,499.06 7,826.08 187763 03/01/2018 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCTS OFFICE SUPPLIES: PW VAR DEPTS 388.93 INC OFFICE SUPPLIES:PW DEPTS 40.83 429.76 187764 03/01/2018 009608 GOLDEN VALLEY MUSIC TIX: CLASSICS AT THE MERC: 626.50 SOCIETY FEBRUARY TIX: OUT OF THIS WORLD 2/24 1,276.56 1,903.06 187765 03/01/2018 003792 GRAINGER MISC STAGE SUPPLIES: THEATER 126.92 126.92 187766 03/01/2018 015451 GREATAMERICA FINANCIAL FEB LEASE FOR 16 COPIERS:CITY SVCS HALL/OFF-S 523.70 523.70 Page:? apChkLst Final Check List 03/01/2018 11:45:50AM CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 8 Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor 187768 03/01/2018 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC Description Amount Paid Check Total MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: VAR PARKS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: OLD TOWN MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: CRC MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: CRC MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: CRC MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: CRC MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: AQUATICS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: AQUATICS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: IWTCM MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR MAINT SUPPLIES-HARVESTON LK PK MAINT SUPPLIES-HARVESTON LK PK MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: VAR PARKS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: VAR PARKS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: VAR PARKS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: VAR PARKS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: VAR PARKS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: VAR PARKS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: VAR PARKS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: VAR PARKS HARDWARE SUPPLIES - STN 73 BC MAINT SUPPLIES: TVM MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: TVE2 MAINT SUPPLIES-HARVESTON LK PK MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES:PW STREET C MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES:PW STREET C MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES:PW STREET C MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES:PW STREET C MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: VAR PARKS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: VAR PARKS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: VAR PARKS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: VAR PARKS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: VAR PARKS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: VAR PARKS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: VAR PARKS HARDWARE SUPPLIES - STA73 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: THEATER MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: TVE2 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: VAR PARKS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: VAR PARKS 240.84 47.83 12.27 11.95 2.49 23.35 12.57 35.37 0.85 21.63 34.76 1.08 12.36 27.80 40.92 16.25 160.83 7.59 18.42 3.86 47.50 33.42 24.98 28.21 32.61 36.52 1.95 12.48 93.39 39.18 15.20 91.22 65.23 425.69 35.88 29.01 33.23 59.90 21.73 37.39 8.66 7.50 76.64 136.66 2.38 37.63 Page:8 apChkLst Final Check List 03101/2018 11:45:50AM CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 9 Bank : union UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Description Amount Paid Check Total MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: VAR PARKS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: VAR PARKS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: VAR PARKS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: VAR PARKS MISCELLANEOUS SMALL TOOLS & EQUI MAINT SUPPLIES-HARVESTON LK PK MAINT SUPPLIES: TVM MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: THEATER 187769 03/01/2018 020506 HEMET UNIFIED SCHOOL REFUND:OVERPMT:FIELD DISTRICT TRIP:CAWSTON ELEM 187770 03/01/2018 003624 HOWELL, ANN MARIE GRAPHIC DESIGN: ECON DEV 187771 03/01/2018 007767 I C COMPOUND COMPANY ASPHALT SUPPLIES: PW STREET MAINT DIV 214.54 11.76 41.84 42.72 32.61 134.75 12.04 26.08 94.58 246.59 3,024.72 100.00 100.00 990.00 990.00 861.49 861.49 187772 03/01/2018 006914 INNOVATIVE DOCUMENT JAN COPIER 631.83 SOLUTIONS MAINT/REPAIR/USAGE:CITYWDE JAN COPIER MAINT/REPAIR/USAGE:CITI 10,591.39 11,223.22 187773 03/01/2018 000198 INTL COUNCIL OF SHOPPING MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL: EDWARDS, 50.00 50.00 MARYANN 187774 03/01/2018 015673 JDS VIDEO & MEDIA VIDEO PRODUCTION: ECON DEV 850.00 850.00 PRODUCTIONS 187775 03/01/2018 011841 JOE RHODES MAINTENANCE, SERVICE INC 187776 03/01/2018 001091 KEYSER MARSTON ASSOCIATES INC, ATTN DIANE CHAMBERS FUEL PUMP: STA 95 FUEL PUMP: STA 95 JAN REAL ESTATE, HOUSING, CONSULT SVCS 2,291.99 1,131.02 4,875.00 3,423.01 4,875.00 187777 03/01/2018 013797 LA JOLLA BOOKING AGENCY STTLMNT: ABBA SHOW 2/23/18 6,740.00 STTLMNT: STONES & STEWART 2/25 5,960.00 12,700.00 187778 03/01/2018 000210 LEAGUE OF CALIF CITIES MEMBERSHIP MTG: EDWARDS, M. 25.00 25.00 187779 03/01/2018 020505 LEON,ADRIANA REFUND:SEC DEP:RM RENTAL:CRC 200.00 200.00 187780 03/01/2018 004905 LIEBERT, CASSIDY & JAN 18 LEGAL SVCS FOR TE060-00001 355.00 355.00 WHITMORE 187781 03/01/2018 011145 LODATO JILL CHRISTINE, DBA: TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 2,699.90 THE PARTY MOM TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 3,596.99 6,296.89 Page apChkLst Final Check List 03/0112018 11:45:50AM CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 10 Bank : union UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor 187782 03/01/2018 014365 MAILFINANCE INC 187783 03/01/2018 020510 MARTINEZ, XOCHITI 187784 03/01/2018 020503 MCINTOSH, PATRICIA 187785 03/01/2018 018314 MICHAEL BAKER (Continued) Description Amount Paid Check Total 03/14-06/13/18 POSTAGE 1,224.94 1,224.94 METER:LEASE REFUND:SEC DEP:RM RENTAL:TCC 150.00 150.00 REFUND:SEC DEP/KITCHEN 471.82 471.82 RENTAL:CRC 10/2-12/3/17 DSGN SVCS: PECHANGA 9,126.80 9,126.80 INTERNATIONAL PKWY 187786 03/01/2018 013827 MIKO MOUNTAINLION INC INSTALL TEMP FENCING: PARK -N -RIDE 187787 03/01/2018 012264 MIRANDA, JULIO C. 187788 03/01/2018 004043 MISSION ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC 187789 03/01/2018 016445 MKB PRINTING & PROMOTIONAL INC, DBA MINUTEMAN PRESS 187790 03/01/2018 001986 MUZAK LLC 187791 03/01/2018 015164 NATURES IMAGE INC 187792 03/01/2018 020507 NESLINE, CHRISTINE 187793 03/01/2018 014391 NICHOLS, KELLIE D TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: PARKING GARAGE ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: TES POOL RESTROOM LIGHT UPGRADES: HARV LY 3,000.00 3,000.00 537.60 470.40 218.40 877.78 735.62 129.68 BUSINESS CARDS:TEMECULA POLICE 32.22 1,226.40 1,743.08 ENVELOPES, RETURN -PINK, CERTS:BW 1,643.68 1,675.90 MAR DISH NETWORK PRGM:41952 6TH 68.37 ST MAR DISH NETWORK PROGRAMING:FOI 156.27 224.64 DEC PECHANGA PKWY ENVIRON 574.11 MITIGATION JAN PECHANGA PKWY ENVIRON MITIGA 400.26 974.37 BALANCE ADJ FOR VIOLATION 35.00 35.00 DISMISSAL TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 336.00 336.00 187794 03/01/2018 019472 NNASERVICES LLC REFUND:SEC DEP:RM RENTAL:CONF 150.00 150.00 CTR NB 187795 03/01/2018 002292 OASIS VENDING KITCHEN & COFFEE SUPPLIES:MPSC 1,075.29 1,075.29 187796 03/01/2018 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE AND SERVICE CITY VEHICLE MAINT SVCS:PW STREET MAINT 187797 03/01/2018 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE AND SERVICE CITY VEHICLE MAINT SVCS:PARK RANGER 2,017.31 2,017.31 632.84 632.84 Page:10 apChkLst 03/01/2018 11:45:50AM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 11 Bank : union UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor 187798 03/01/2018 013198 ORTENZO-HAYES, KRISTINE 187799 03/01/2018 020504 OSHODI, SUNYATA 187800 03/01/2018 011549 POWER SPORTS UNLIMITED, DBA BMW MOTORCYCLES OF NO 187801 03/01/2018 017648 RAHN, MATT 187802 03/01/2018 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DISTRICT 187803 03/01/2018 020350 REEFE, REBECCA 187804 03/01/2018 020379 RICHARD ALLEN ENTERPRISES LLC 187805 03/01/2018 000353 RIVERSIDE CO AUDITOR, CONTROLLER (STOP 1050) 187806 03/01/2018 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS DEPT 187807 03/01/2018 012251 ROTH, DONALD J 187808 03/01/2018 004274 SAFE AND SECURE LOCKSMITH SRVC 187809 03/01/2018 020509 SANCHEZ, ARMANDO (Continued) Description Amount Paid Check Total TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS REFUND:CREDIT ON ACCT:TCSD VEHICLE MAINT & REPAIR: POLICE MOTORS VEHICLE MAINT & REPAIR: POLICE MOT! VEHICLE MAINT & REPAIR: POLICE MOT' MTG WITH CITY LOBBYISTS 2/25-2/26/18 FEB VAR WATER METERS:PW YMCA FEB VAR WATER METERS:TCSD SVC LE' FEB LNDSCP WATER METER:CALLE ELE REFUND:MISS CATHY'S TINY TOTS FREEDOM RIDERS:A CIVIL RIGHTS MUSICAL 2/ JAN '18 PRKG CITATION ASSESSMENTS 01/04/18-01/31/18 LAW ENFORCEMENT TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS KEY, SPARE: PARKS VEHICLE #03-086 LOCKSMITH SRVCS:CRC LOCKSMITH SERVICES:LIBRARY LOCKSMITH SRVCS: CRC 2/2/18 LOCKSMITH SRVCS: CIVIC CENTER REFUND:BALADJ FOR VIOL DISMISSED:323178 187810 03/01/2018 020501 SANDEE, MARY REFUND:DUPL PERMIT:B18-0432 386.40 338.10 1,159.20 1,159.20 394.45 362.25 386.40 24.00 1,364.20 51.00 542.25 461.50 361.41 7,443.53 30.55 78.00 3,500.00 3,291.00 2,095,543.86 441.00 441.00 97.51 26.94 26.40 17.24 30.17 305.00 4,186.00 24.00 1,957.45 461.50 7,835.49 78.00 3,500.00 3,291.00 2,095,543.86 882.00 198.26 305.00 266.00 266.00 Page:11 apChkLst 03/01/2018 11:45:50A M Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 12 Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor 187811 03/01/2018 017699 SARNOWSKI SHAWNA M PRESTON 187812 03/01/2018 011511 SCUBA CENTER TEMECULA 187813 03/01/2018 009213 SHERRY BERRY MUSIC, ATTN SHERRY WILLIAMS 187814 03/01/2018 009746 SIGNS BY TOMORROW 187815 03/01/2018 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 187816 03/01/2018 001212 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 187817 03/01/2018 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTROL INC Description Amount Paid Check Total PHOTOGRAPHY:CULTURAL ARTS PHOTOGRAPHY:SWEETHEART CONGER TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS JAZZ @ THE MERC 2/22/18 JAN SIGN POSTING SRVCS XX -0324: P LN G JAN SIGN POSTING SRVCS XX -1508-09:F JAN SIGN POSTING NOI TO ADOPT MND JAN SIGN POSTING XX0741, XX1640:PLI\ FEB 2-33-357-5785:44747 REDHAWK PKWY JAN 2-30-296-9522:46679 PRIMROSE AVE JAN 2-30-099-3847:29721 RYECREST FEB 2-28-331-4847:32805 PAUBA RD LS3 FEB 2-34-624-4452:32131 S LOOP RD LO - JAN 095-167-7907-2:30650 PAUBA RD JAN 125-244-2108-3: 30600 PAUBA RD PEST CONTROL SRVCS:O.A.T.C. PEST CONTROL SRVCS:STA 92 PEST CONTROL SRVCS:PBSP PEST CONTROL SRVCS:WOLF CREEK P. PEST CONTROL SRVCS:RRSP PEST CONTROL SRVCS:RRSP PEST CONTROL SRVCS:MEADOWS PAR PEST CONTROL SRVCS:DUCK POND PEST CONTROL SRVCS:MARG SPLASH I 150.00 150.00 52.50 504.00 569.00 851.00 425.50 425.50 425.50 33.95 622.38 25.55 103.20 1,129.25 194.04 446.34 48.00 42.00 70.00 49.00 188.00 94.00 94.00 49.00 84.00 300.00 556.50 569.00 2,127.50 1,914.33 640.38 718.00 Page:12 apChkLst Final Check List 03/01/2018 11:45:50AM CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 13 Bank : union UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor 187818 03/01/2018 008337 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE (Continued) Description Amount Paid Check Total OFFICE SUPPLIES:HUMAN SERVICES 45.15 OFFICE SUPPLIES:HUMAN SERVICES OFFICE SUPPLIES:POLICE MALL STORE OFFICE SUPPLIES:POLICE MALL STORE OFFICE SUPPLIES:POLICE MALL STORE OFFICE SUPPLIES:POLICE MALL STORE OFFICE SUPPLIES:POLICE MALL STORE OFFICE SUPPLIES:CITY MGR OFC OFFICE SUPPLIES:CITY MGR OFC OFFICE SUPPLIES:CITY MGR OFC OFFICE SUPPLIES:LIBRARY OFFICE SUPPLIES:TCSDADMIN OFFICE SUPPLIES:TCSD ADMIN OFFICE SUPPLIES:TCSD ADMIN SUPPLIES:SKATE PARK 187819 03/01/2018 003599 T Y LIN INTERNATIONAL JAN CONSULT SRVCS:FV PKWY/I-15 OVRCRSS 187820 03/01/2018 003677 TEMECULA MOTORSPORTS LLC VEH REPAIR & MAINT:TEMECULA POLICE VEH REPAIR & MAINT:TEMECULA POLICI VEH REPAIR & MAINT:TEMECULA POLICI VEH REPAIR & MAINT:TEMECULA POLICI VEH REPAIR & MAINT:TEMECULA POLICI 187821 03/01/2018 020502 TEMECULAVALLEYCULTURAL REFUND:SEC DEP:RM RENTAL:CRC CTR 90.08 310.79 64.83 41.52 9.75 40.51 39.99 86.43 83.22 86.39 39.18 4.50 288.97 148.07 1,379.38 74,796.71 74,796.71 238.76 40.50 765.42 244.42 40.05 1,329.15 150.00 150.00 187822 03/01/2018 010276 TIME WARNER CABLE FEB HIGH SPEED INTERNET:40820 1.60 WINCHESTER FEB HIGH SPEED INTERNET:32211 WOLF 184.62 FEB HIGH SPEED INTERNET:41000 MAIN 2,079.00 FEB HIGH SPEED INTERNET:41000 MAIN 4,074.26 6,339.48 187823 03/01/2018 018556 TRAUB NORMAN, DBA 11/20-12/14 WORKPLACE 10,351.00 10,351.00 NORMAN A TRAUB ASSOC INVESTIGATIONS:HR 187824 03/01/2018 014848 VALUTEC CARD SOLUTIONS JAN TICKETING SRVCS:THEATER 924.32 924.32 LLC 187825 03/01/2018 014486 VERIZON WIRELESS 187826 03/01/2018 018147 WADDLETON, JEFFREY L. 1/11-2/10 TASK FORCE 436.72 436.72 TABLETS:POLICE TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 280.00 280.00 187827 03/01/2018 006248 WALKER, JESSICA TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 563.50 563.50 Page:13 apChkLst Final Check List 03/0112018 11:45:50AM CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 14 Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 187828 03/01/2018 000341 WILLDAN ASSOCIATES INC MAY '17 ON-CALL TRAF ENG SRVCS:PW TRAFFI 1001979 02/22/2018 020494 CHIEN, SHARON 1001980 02/22/2018 019990 CONCEPCION, CATHERINE 1001981 02/22/2018 020496 WARD, VIOLETA 9,470.66 9,470.66 REFUND:BALANCE ON ACCT:TCSD 55.00 55.00 REFUND:CREDIT ON ACCT:TCSD 500.00 500.00 REFUND:CREDIT ON ACCT:TCSD 38.00 38.00 Grand total for UNION BANK: 3,287,675.57 Page:14 apChkLst 03/01/2018 11:45:50AM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 15 119 checks in this report. Grand Total All Checks. 3,287,675 57 Page:15 apChkLst Final Check List 03/08/2018 9:54:35AM CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 1 Bank : union UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor 3699 02/22/2018 006887 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA Description Amount Paid Check Total 014583 PALUMBO'S RISTORANTE, LLC AA RFRHSHMNTS: CITY ATTY MTG 1/23/18 3700 02/22/2018 006887 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA 020489 GREYHOUND LINES 3701 02/22/2018 006887 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA 016071 HARBOR FREIGHT TOOLS 106.96 106.96 CG BUS TICKET HOMELESS 179.91 OUTREACH CG REVERSAL OF FINANCE CHARGES -1.71 LM STANDS FOR VEHICLE 427.17 INSPECTIONS LM REVERSAL OF FINANCE CHARGES -1.75 3703 02/22/2018 006887 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA 008668 WES FLOWERS IG SUNSHINE FUND 61.43 008668 WES FLOWERS IG SUNSHINE FUND 61.43 006937 SOUTHWEST AIRLINES IG AIRFARE: CONFERENCE: GARIBAY, 131.96 008668 WES FLOWERS IG SUNSHINE FUND 61.43 019302 "' MR. WORLDWIDE IG DEPOSIT: RFRSHMNTS: EOQ 850.00 CATERING LUNCHEON 178.20 425.42 006937 SOUTHWEST AIRLINES IG AIRFARE: CONFERENCE: GARIBAY, 113.96 1,280.21 3707 03/05/2018 007282 AMAZON.COM, INC TEACHING EQUIPMENT MEDIC 632.90 MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES: BC 218.80 851.70 3708 03/05/2018 006887 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA 006952 PAYPAL JH VERISIGN PAYFLOW PRO 164.90 TRANSACTION 004765 ACTIVE NETWORK INC, THE JH REGISTRATION: TYLER CONNECT: 925.00 1,089.90 WOOSLEY 3709 03/07/2018 007282 AMAZON.COM, INC BOOKS/COLLECTIONS:LIBRARY 411.83 BOOKS/COLLECTIONS:LIBRARY 16.21 MUSEUM SUPPLIES:TVM 189.33 SM TOOLS/EQUIP:CRC 618.42 Event supplies:Arts, Culture & 16.70 1,252.49 3710 03/08/2018 010349 CALIF DEPT OF CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT 1,008.45 1,008.45 SUPPORT 3711 03/08/2018 017429 COBRA ADVANTAGE INC., REIMBURSEMENT FSA PAYMENT 14,141.06 14,141.06 DBA:THE ADVANTAGE GROUP 3712 03/08/2018 000194 ICMA RETIREMENT -PLAN ICMA-RC RETIREMENT TRUST 457 8,611.73 8,611.73 303355 PAYMENT Page:1 apChkLst Final Check List 03108/2018 9:54:35AM CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 2 Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor 3713 03/08/2018 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 3714 03/08/2018 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 3715 03/08/2018 000389 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION 3716 03/08/2018 001065 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION Description Amount Paid Check Total STATE TAXES PAYMENT 24,398.25 24,398.25 FEDERAL INCOME TAXES PAYMENT 81,545.58 81,545.58 OBRA- PROJECT RETIREMENT 2,990.76 2,990.76 PAYMENT NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT PAYMENT 12,782.73 12,782.73 3717 03/08/2018 019088 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT NATIONWIDE LOAN REPAYMENT SOLUTION PAYMENT 3718 03/08/2018 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT) 3719 03/08/2018 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT) 3720 03/08/2018 000245 PERS-HEALTH INSUR PREMIUM 3721 03/08/2018 007282 AMAZON.COM, INC 187829 03/08/2018 003552 AF L A C 442.44 442.44 PERS RETIREMENT PAYMENT 95,822.60 95,822.60 PERS RETIREMENT PAYMENT 96,183.43 96,183.43 PERS HEALTH PAYMENT 0.00 PERS HEALTH PAYMENT 125,615.14 125,615.14 Event supplies:Arts, Culture & 43.38 MISC SUPPLIES:VARIOUS EVENTS 39.84 MISC SUPPLIES:PREV. ANNUAL INSPEC- 282.78 SUPPLIES & EQUIPMENT:SPECIAL EVEN 80.68 446.68 AFLAC ACCIDENT INDEMNITY 3,432.64 3,432.64 PAYMENT 187830 03/08/2018 004973 ABACHERLI, LINDI TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 280.00 280.00 187831 03/08/2018 015217 AIRGAS INC., DBA AIRGAS GAS FOR DRY ICE 7.20 USA LLC EXPERIMENTS:PPW GAS FOR DRY ICE EXPERIMENTS:PPW 10.66 GAS FOR DRY ICE EXPERIMENTS:PPW 20.06 187832 03/08/2018 019604 AIRWAVE COMMUNICATIONS ANTENNAE: EMERG MGMT 3,623.57 ENT 187833 03/08/2018 003951 ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT 187834 03/08/2018 009374 ALLEGRO MUSICAL VENTURES, DBA: ALLEGRO PIANO SERVIC ASPHALT PRODUCTS: CITYWIDE ASPHALT PRODUCTS: CITYWIDE ASPHALT PRODUCTS: CITYWIDE ASPHALT PRODUCTS: CITYWIDE PIANO TUNING & MAINT: THEATER PIANO TUNING & MAINT: THEATER 400.15 539.49 776.36 522.28 185.00 37.92 3,623.57 2,238.28 185.00 370.00 Page2 apChkLst 03/0812018 9:54:35AM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 3 Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor 187835 03/08/2018 014356 ARSENAL FUTBOL CLUB, INC. 187836 03/08/2018 018941 AZTEC LANDSCAPING, INC. 187837 03/08/2018 019709 BAGDASARIAN, NADYA 187838 03/08/2018 011954 BAKER & TAYLOR INC 187839 03/08/2018 006254 BALLET FOLKLORICO, AKA: LORENA HANCOCK 187840 03/08/2018 015592 BAMM PROMOTIONAL PRODUCTS, INC 187841 03/08/2018 004262 BIO-TOX LABORATORIES 187842 03/08/2018 014284 BLAKELY'S TRUCK SERVICE 187843 03/08/2018 012583 BLANCAY PRICE 187844 03/08/2018 018408 BOB CALLAHAN'S POOL SERVICE 187845 03/08/2018 017973 BUSINESS CENTER CENTRAL, LLC 187846 03/08/2018 001035 C R & RINC 187847 03/08/2018 003138 CAL MAT Description Amount Paid Check Total REFUND:SEC DEP:PHBSP SOCCER FIELD 4 JANITORIAL SRVCS:VARI PARKS JAN RESTROOMS:SHELTERS MAINT: VAI RFRSHMNTS BEST GROUP AWARD: COM DEV BOOK COLLECTIONS:LIBRARY RECORDS ON TAPE BOOK COLLECTIONS:LIBRARY BOOK COLLECTIONS:LIBRARY BOOK COLLECTIONS:LIBRARY BOOK COLLECTIONS:LIBRARY BOOK COLLECTIONS:LIBRARY TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS STAFF UNIFORMS:CRC DRUG/ALCOHOL ANALYSIS:POLICE DRUG/ALCOHOL ANALYSIS:POLICE DRUG/ALCOHOL ANALYSIS:POLICE VEH & EQUIP REPAIRS: STREET MAINT VEH & EQUIP REPAIRS: STREET MAINT VEH & EQUIPMENT REPAIR: ST MAINT VEH & EQUIP REPAIRS: STREET MAINT VEH & EQUIP REPAIRS: STREET MAINT NOV LDSCP PLAN CHECK & INSPECTION SVCS FEB POOLS & FOUNTAINS MAINT:VAR FACILITI FEB POOLS & FOUNTAINS MAINT:CRC STICKERS FOR ECO DEV EMERGENCY DEBRIS CLEAN UP ASPHALT PURCH: STREET MAINT 2,000.00 821.57 7,729.74 106.14 623.34 5.60 1,343.55 101.91 17.28 92.74 107.87 161.70 161.70 102.90 299.55 389.00 939.70 1,756.00 320.08 720.07 370.19 1,074.01 245.38 10,155.00 925.00 1,050.00 34.80 366.91 2,000.00 8,551.31 106.14 2,292.29 426.30 299.55 3,084.70 2,729.73 10,155.00 1,975.00 34.80 366.91 174.50 174.50 Page:3 apChkLst 03/08/2018 9:54:35AM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 4 Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor 187848 03/08/2018 020513 CAL SOUTH 187849 03/08/2018 004248 CALIF DEPT OF JUSTICE-ACCTING 187850 03/08/2018 013318 CARDENAS, ROBERT 187851 03/08/2018 018719 CM SCHOOL SUPPLY INC 187852 03/08/2018 004091 COMMUNITY ACCESS CENTER 187853 03/08/2018 004405 COMMUNITY HEALTH CHARITIES 187854 03/08/2018 000442 COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS 187855 03/08/2018 002945 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST. 187856 03/08/2018 011922 CORELOGIC, INC., DBA:CORELOGIC SOLUTIONS, 187857 03/08/2018 014521 COSTAR GROUP INFORMATION, INC 187858 03/08/2018 001264 COSTCO TEMECULA 491 187859 03/08/2018 004329 COSTCO TEMECULA #491 187860 03/08/2018 002631 COUNTS UNLIMITED INC 187861 03/08/2018 004524 CRAFCO INC -ABSOLUTE ASPHALT 187862 03/08/2018 010650 CRAFTSMEN PLUMBING & HVAC INC Description Amount Paid Check Total REFUND:SEC DEP:PHBSP SOCCER FIELDS 1-4 FINGERPRINTING SVCS: VARI DEPTS REIMB:PARMA CONF: 2/13-16 SUPPLIES:PPW SUPPLIES:PPW 2018 RCVOAD MEMBERSHIP DUES EMPLOYEE CHARITY DONATIONS PAYMENT ALARM SYS MONITORING: FIRE STA 95 ALARM SYS MONITORING: FIRE STA 95 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR DEC PROP ID SFTWR: CODE ENFORCEMENT MAR 18 WEB SUBSCRIPTION:ECO DEV MEETING SUPPLIES: BC SUPPLIES:VARIOUS SPECIAL EVENTS TRAFFIC COUNT DATA COLLECTION SVCS: PW ASPHALT SUPPLIES: PW STREET MAINT DIV PLUMBING REPAIRS: CIVIC CTR PLUMBING REPAIRS: MPSC HVAC MAINT SVCS - IWTCM - PW16-02 EQUIPMENT MAIN - STA 95 PLUMBING MAINT: STA 84 EQUIPMENT MAINT: STA 84 EQUIPMENT MAINT - STA 92 PLUMBING MAINT: STA 84 2,000.00 4,851 00 439.27 10.92 70.42 25.00 4.00 75.00 75.00 205.54 295.50 453.19 175.04 363.38 15,150.00 3,723.50 609.20 140.00 410.00 2,890.00 158.32 130.00 650.00 594.00 2,000 00 4,851 00 439.27 81.34 25.00 4.00 150.00 205.54 295.50 453.19 175.04 363.38 15,150.00 3,723.50 5,581 52 Page:4 apChkLst Final Check List 03/08/2018 9:54:35AM CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 5 Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 187863 03/08/2018 020522 CUB SCOUTS OF AMERICA REFUND:SEC DEP:RM RENTAL:CRC 187864 03/08/2018 012600 DAVID EVANS & ASSOCIATES DSIGN SVCS FALLEN HEROES: INC PW17-07 187865 03/08/2018 002990 DAVID TURCH &ASSOCIATES FEB FEDERAL LOBBYING SVCS 187866 03/08/2018 013812 DFIT SUBS LLC SANDWICHES:HIGH HOPES 187867 03/08/2018 004192 DOWNS ENERGY FUEL & LUBRICANTS FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES:TRAFFIC DIV FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: PUBLIC WOF FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: PUBLIC WOF FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: TCSD FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: BLDG INSPEI FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: CODE ENFOI FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: POLICE FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: LAND DEV 187868 03/08/2018 019293 E&F PET SUPPLIES INC k-9 food & supplies: tem police 200.00 200.00 469.00 469.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 645.98 645.98 62.21 922.91 901.91 434.94 182.59 68.69 87.78 72.87 2,733.90 94.50 94.50 187869 03/08/2018 004829 ELLISON WILSON ADVOCACY MAR STATE LOBBYING SVCS 3,500.00 LLC FEB STATE LOBBYING SVCS 3,500.00 7,000.00 187870 03/08/2018 011202 EMH SPORTS USA INC TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 542.50 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 1,037.40 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 525.00 2,104.90 187871 03/08/2018 011292 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE 12/2 - 12/31/17 EIR: ALTAIR 5,391.86 5,391.86 ASSOC. 187872 03/08/2018 017432 EYEMED VISION CARE VISION PLAN PAYMENT 1,550.44 1,550.44 187873 03/08/2018 019469 FALCON ENGINEERING FEB CONSTRUCTION MGMT SVCS: 152,694.98 SERVICES PW04-08 FEB CNSTR MGMT SVC:WINCHESTER P' 28,083.00 180,777.98 187874 03/08/2018 019731 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC PLUMBING SUPPLIES: VARIOUS 223.91 PARKS PLUMBING SUPPLIES: VARIOUS PARKS 70.71 294.62 187875 03/08/2018 020013 FOLKLORE INC THEATER PERF: 03/09/18 3,500.00 3,500.00 187876 03/08/2018 002982 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD SUPPORT PAYMENT 260.00 SUPPORT PAYMENT 69.99 329.99 187877 03/08/2018 016436 FRICK, TRACY SISTER CITY VISIT ITEMS 11/28-12/3/17 69.88 69.88 Page:5 apChkLst Final Check List 03/08/2018 9:54:35AM CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 6 Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor 187878 03/08/2018 018858 FRONTIER CALIFORNIA INC Description Amount Paid Check Total FEB INTERNET SVCS:THEATER 146.98 MAR INTERNET SVCS:EOC 136.14 283.12 187879 03/08/2018 013076 GAUDET YVONNE M, DBA YES TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 268.80 268.80 YOU CAN DRAW 187880 03/08/2018 005405 GILLILAND, ROBIN LODGING & MILEAGE:PERF CNF 427.92 427.92 1/23-24 187881 03/08/2018 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCTS MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES: FINANCE 114.93 114.93 INC 187882 03/08/2018 003792 GRAINGER SAFETY SUPPLIES: STREET MAINT 189.23 189.23 DIV 187883 03/08/2018 015451 GREATAMERICA FINANCIAL FEB LEASE FOR 6 COPIERS:LIBRARY SVCS 187884 03/08/2018 020516 GUILAK-ANWAR, HALEH REFUND:CREDIT ON ACCT:TCSD 187885 03/08/2018 003342 HABITAT FOR HUMANITY, INLAND VALLEY INC 9/5/17-1/31/18 CRITICAL HOME REPAIR PRGM 9/5/17-1/31/18 CRITICAL HOME REPAIR P CDBG 2017-18 Critical Home Repair 793.89 793.89 860.00 860.00 4,894.73 3,805.51 2,308.93 11, 009.17 Page6 apChkLst Final Check List 03/08/2018 9:54:35AM CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 7 Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor 187886 03/08/2018 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC 187887 03/08/2018 020128 HOME HEALTHCARE OF RIVERSIDE Description Amount Paid Check Total MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: VAR PARKS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: VAR PARKS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: VAR PARKS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: VAR PARKS MAINT SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR MAINT SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR MAINT SUPPLIES: CONF CTR MAINT SUPPLIES-HARVESTON LK PK MAINT SUPPLIES-HARVESTON LK PK MAINT SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR MAINT SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR MAINT SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR MAINT SUPPLIES: CRC MAINT SUPPLIES: CRC MAINT SUPPLIES: CRC MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: VAR PARKS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: VAR PARKS DISCOUNT TAKEN: ACCOUNT 2649 MAINT SUPPLIES: TPL MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: STREET DIV MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: STREET DIV MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES:PW STREET C MAINT SUPPLIES: IWTCM MAINT SUPPLIES: IWTCM MAINT SUPPLIES: MPSC MAINT SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR MAINT SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR MAINT SUPPLIES: CRC MAINT SUPPLIES: CRC MAINT SUPPLIES: TVM MISC SMALL TOOLS & EQUIP: TRAFFIC MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: AQUATICS MAINT SUPPLIES: IWTCM MAINT SUPPLIES: TPL 4.67 21.03 28.79 20.64 21.63 22.40 21.70 134.53 52.71 38.45 10.86 26.38 89.29 19.55 3.39 19.11 8.12 -54.33 27.04 36.95 25.53 3.43 47.83 20.18 17.63 55.40 10.86 59.81 70.42 1.51 37.50 2.47 5.38 6.94 MEDICAL SVCS CLASSES 300.00 MEDICAL SVCS CLASSES MEDICAL SVCS CLASSES MEDICAL SVCS CLASSES MEDICAL SVCS CLASSES 187888 03/08/2018 011049 HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY JUL-DEC 17 SUB -RECIPIENT -HOSPICE CARE PR 187889 03/08/2018 017334 HOUSE OF AUTOMATION INC. BAY DOOR REPAIR: STATION 73 300.00 300.00 300.00 300.00 3,961.17 917.80 1,500.00 3,961 17 2,210.00 2,210.00 Page:7 apChkLst Final Check List 03/0812018 9:54:35AM CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 8 Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 187890 03/08/2018 003624 HOWELL, ANN MARIE MISC GRAPHIC ART SRVCS: CM OFC 1,540.00 1,540.00 187891 03/08/2018 019903 IMS INFRASTRUCTURE PAVEMENT MGMT PRGM: PW17-01 34,000.00 34,000.00 MANAGEMENT, SERVICES LLC 187892 03/08/2018 015089 IN THE MIX SOUND MISC STAGE SUPPLIES: THEATER 1,275.41 1,275.41 187893 03/08/2018 001407 INTER VALLEY POOL SUPPLY POOL CHEMICAL SUPPLIES: VAR 642.58 642.58 INC POOLS 187894 03/08/2018 020005 ISSOKSON, JASON D. Theater Performance: Mar 10, 2018 1,000.00 1,000.00 187895 03/08/2018 012883 JACOB'S HOUSE INC EMPLOYEE CHARITY DONATIONS PAYMENT 40.00 40.00 187896 03/08/2018 018352 JAMES ELLIOTT PERFORMANCE:THEATER 3/8 1,650.00 1,650.00 ENTERTAINMENT, 187897 03/08/2018 015673 JDS VIDEO & MEDIA VIDEO PRODUCTION: ECO DEV 125.00 125.00 PRODUCTIONS 187898 03/08/2018 020008 KELLEY, DANA Theater Performance: Mar 10, 2018 930.00 930.00 187899 03/08/2018 001091 KEYSER MARSTON JAN AFFORDABLE HOUSING 6,146.28 ASSOCIATES INC, ATTN DIANE ANALYSIS:COM DEV CHAMBERS JAN CONSULTANT SVCS UTSP DEV 187900 03/08/2018 020009 KIM, CLARA H. Theater Performance: Mar 10, 2018 187901 03/08/2018 020519 KIM, GRACE 187902 03/08/2018 020396 KINGDOM CAUSES, DBA CITY NET REFUND:BASKETBALL - TINY TOTS 2300.203 REFUND:BASKETBALL - TINY TOTS 2300 12/14-01/13/18 HOMELESS COLLBRTVE SVCS 11/14-12/13/17 HOMELESS COLLBRTVE 01/14-02/13/18 HOMELESS COLLBRTVE 187903 03/08/2018 001282 KNORR SYSTEMS INC VARIOUS CHEMICALS. SPLASH PAD 5,924.38 12,070.66 930.00 930.00 25.00 25.00 50.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 30,000.00 746.00 746.00 187904 03/08/2018 017118 KRACH BREE B, DBA PLANNING COMMISSION GAVEL 65.25 TEMECULA TROPHY & DES NAMETAGS: THEATER 112.56 187905 03/08/2018 000482 LEIGHTON CONSULTING INC 5/1-1/31/18 GEOTECHNICAL SVCS: 734.80 PW06-09 177.81 734.80 Page:8 apChkLst Final Check List 03/08/2018 9:54:35AM CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 9 Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 187906 03/08/2018 020514 LEISURE PLAY SOFTBALL REFUND:SEC DEP:2014 PHBSP BALL 250.00 FIELD 1 REFUND:SEC DEP:2009 SLOWPITCH TO' 1,000.00 1,250.00 187907 03/08/2018 019884 LEONIDA BUILDERS INC OLD TOWN SIDEWALK 39,691.00 IMPROVEMENTS: PW15-06 OLD TOWN SIDEWALK IMPROVEMNTS: F 21,693.44 61,384.44 187908 03/08/2018 013982 M C I COMM SERVICE FEB XXX -0714 GEN USAGE:PD MALL 35.46 ALARM FEB XXX -0346 GENERAL USAGE 33.76 69.22 187909 03/08/2018 004141 MAINTEX INC CLEANING SUPPLIES: VARI FACILITIES 572.39 572.39 187910 03/08/2018 017427 MATCHETT, VIVIAN TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 254.80 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 109.20 364.00 187911 03/08/2018 014392 MC COLLOUGH JILL DENISE, MAR INTERIOR PLANTSCAPE - CIVIC 500.00 DBA TEMECULA PLANTSCAPE CTR MAR INTERIOR PLANTSCAPE - LIBRARY 200.00 700.00 187912 03/08/2018 018675 MDG ASSOCIATES INC JAN CDBG ADMIN SVCS 5,913.75 5,913.75 187913 03/08/2018 019823 MERCHANTS BLDG MAINT LLC JAN JANITORIAL SVCS:VARI 20,665.99 20,665.99 FACILITIES 187915 03/08/2018 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE DENTAL HMO PAYMENT 10,914.89 10,914.89 COMPANY 187916 03/08/2018 018314 MICHAEL BAKER 11/01-01/28/18 EIR:TEM CREEK INN 21,293.57 INTERNATIONAL DEV P/E 1/28/18 ENG SUPPORT SVCS: PW04- 10,959.50 32,253.07 187917 03/08/2018 012962 MILLER MISTY, DBA: BOOT TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 292.60 CAMP WITH A KICK TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 425.60 718.20 187918 03/08/2018 004043 MISSION ELECTRIC SUPPLY ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: VAR PARKS 70.74 70.74 INC 187919 03/08/2018 001868 MIYAMOTO-JURKOSKY, SUSAN TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 371.00 ANN 187920 03/08/2018 016445 MKB PRINTING & PROMOTIONAL INC, DBA MINUTEMAN PRESS 187921 03/08/2018 004040 MORAMARCO, ANTHONY J, DBA BIGFOOT GRAPHICS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS BUSINESS CARDS - PARKS & FACILITIES 339.20 339.21 1,049.41 485.00 BUSINESS CARDS & STATIONERY:ADMIr 37.52 PRINTING SRVCS:BUILDING & SAFETY 149.23 PRINTING SRVCS:CODE ENFORCEMENT 48.99 720.74 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 42.00 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 385.00 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 192.50 619.50 Page9 apChkLst Final Check List 03/08/2018 9:54:35AM CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 10 Bank : union UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Description Amount Paid Check Total 187922 03/08/2018 002925 NAPA AUTO PARTS MISC SUPPLIES: ST MAINT DIV 187923 03/08/2018 014391 NICHOLS, KELLIE D TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 187924 03/08/2018 019839 O'CONNOR, DENISE TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 74.07 74.07 450.45 327.60 378.00 403.20 176.40 160.65 100.80 378.00 428.40 151.20 2,954.70 105.00 105.00 187925 03/08/2018 003964 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SVS OFFICE SUPPLIES: HR 37.26 DIV OFFICE SUPPLIES: HR 18.69 OFFICE SUPPLIES: HR 264.00 319.95 187926 03/08/2018 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE AND SERVICE CITY VEHICLE MAINT SVCS:PW PARKS 1,663.38 MAINT CITY VEHICLE MAINT SVCS:PW PARKS A 525.41 CITY VEHICLE MAINT SVCS:PW PARKS h 72.63 CITY VEHICLE MAINT SVCS:PW PARKS h 25.51 CITY VEHICLE MAINT SVCS:PW PARKS h 993.50 CITY VEHICLE MAINT SVCS:PW PARKS h 46.82 CITY VEHICLE MAINT SVCS:PW STREET 388.71 3,715.96 187927 03/08/2018 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE AND SERVICE CITY VEHICLE MAINT SVCS:TCSD 389.45 389.45 187928 03/08/2018 002579 POTAMUS PRESS PROGRAM PRINTING 2018 ROD RUN 1,052.18 1,052.18 187929 03/08/2018 005820 PRE -PAID LEGAL SERVICES PREPAID LEGAL SERVICES PAYMENT 336.85 336.85 INC, DBA: LEGALSHIELD 187930 03/08/2018 000254 PRESS ENTERPRISE 26 WEEKS SUBSCR:CITY MGR OFC 223.65 223.65 COMPANY INC 180905647 187931 03/08/2018 005075 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL JAN UNIFORM/FLR MTS/TWL 685.97 685.97 SUPPLY RENTALS:CITY FAC 187932 03/08/2018 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DISTRICT FEB WATER METER:30875 RANCHO VISTA FEB LNDSCP WATER METER:41415 MEA FEB LNDSCP WATER METER:31132 COR FEB LNDSCP WATER METER:DEPORTOL 7.67 14.52 50.62 6.09 78.90 Page:10 apChkLst Final Check List 03/08/2018 9:54:35AM CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 11 Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 187933 03/08/2018 013632 RELIANCE CHURCH REFUND:SEC DEP:RM RENTAL:CONF CTR A/B 187934 03/08/2018 000418 RIVERSIDE CO CLERK & NTC EXEMPTION R.C. RD ASPHALT RECORDER REHAB 187935 03/08/2018 012251 ROTH, DONALD J TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 187936 03/08/2018 020523 SENIOR SOFTBALL USA REFUND:TOURNAMENT FEES DUE TO RAINOUT 187937 03/08/2018 020529 SERVICELINK LLC REFUND:OVERPMT COVARRUBIAS PAYOFF 187938 03/08/2018 008529 SHERIFFS CIVIL DIV WAGE GARNISHMENT PAYMENT CENTRAL 187939 03/08/2018 013695 SHRED -IT US JV, LLC 1/23, 2/7 DOC SHRED SRVCS:CITY 187940 03/08/2018 000645 SMART AND FINAL INC 187941 03/08/2018 013480 SO CALAAU BASEBALL FACS THEATER HOSPITALITY & OFFICE SUPPLIES REFRESHMENTS & SUPPLIES:ROD RUN REFUND:SEC DEP:PHBSP BALL FIELD 4 REFUND:SEC DEP:BASEBALLTOURNAM 200.00 200.00 50.00 50.00 112.00 112.00 250.00 250.00 367.07 367.07 50.00 50.00 105.93 105.93 91.43 140.25 250.00 1,000.00 231.68 1,250.00 Page:11 apChkLst Final Check List 03/08/2018 9:54:35AM CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 12 Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor 187942 03/08/2018 000537 SO CALIF EDISON Description Amount Paid Check Total FEB 2-29-295-3510:32211 WOLF VLY RD 970.02 FEB 2-30-520-4414:32781 TEM PKWY LS3 1,118.31 FEB 2-34-333-3589:41702 MAIN ST 25.98 FEB 2-31-912-7494:28690 MERCEDES ST 1,503.51 FEB 2-31-536-3655:41904 MAIN ST 915.31 FEB 2-31-536-3481:41902 MAIN ST 149.61 FEB 2-32-903-8293:41000 MAIN ST 13,210.25 FEB 2-00-397-5042:43200 BUS PARK DR t 3,049.12 FEB 2-29-223-8607:42035 2ND ST PED 538.79 FEB 2-39-732-3171:41997 MARGARITA RC 26.50 FEB 2-35-707-0010:33451 S HWY-79 PED 51.70 FEB 2-21-981-4720:30153 TEM PKWY TPF 21.80 FEB 2-28-904-7706:32329 OVERLAND TRI 157.40 FEB 2-29-224-0173:32364 OVERLAND TRI 1,515.29 FEB 2-35-164-3242:44270 MEADOWS PK1, 25.70 FEB 2-31-031-2616:27991 DIAZ RD PED 25.46 FEB 2-29-953-8082:31523 WOLF VLY RD 30.16 FEB 2-29-953-8249:46497 WOLF CREEK C 29.04 FEB 2-31-419-2873:43000 HWY-395 24.89 FEB 2-19-171-8568:28300 MERCEDES ST 583.27 FEB 2-18-937-3152:28314 MERCEDES ST 605.36 FEB 2-14-204-1615:30027 FRONT ST RDI( 36.16 FEB 2-02-351-4946:41845 6TH ST 917.34 FEB 2-25-393-4681:41951 MORAGA RD 636.82 FEB 2-35-403-6337:41375 MCCABE CT 1,166.44 FEB 2-35-664-9053:29119 MARGARITA RE 543.04 FEB 2-29-933-3831:43230 BUS PARK DR 1,715.42 FEB 2-31-282-0665:27407 DIAZ RD PED 25.58 FEB 2-29-807-1226:28077 DIAZ RD PED 25.18 FEB 2-29-807-1093:28079 DIAZ RD PED 25.18 FEB 2-29-657-2787:41638 WINCHESTER 24.89 FEB 2-35-164-3770:43487 BUTTERFIELD : 27.53 FEB 2-35-164-3663:42335 MEADOWS PKC 25.97 FEB 2-35-164-3515:32932 LEENA WAY 25.97 29,772.99 Page:12 apChkLst Final Check List 03/0812018 9:54:35AM CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 13 Bank : union UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor 187943 03/08/2018 001212 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY (Continued) Description Amount Paid Check Total FEB 117-188-6393-6:32131 S LOOP RD FEB 101-525-1560-6:27415 ENTERPRISE FEB 098-255-9828-8:29119 MARGARITA R FEB 026-671-2909-8:42051 MAIN ST FEB 101-525-0950-0:28816 PUJOL ST FEB 021-725-0775-4:41845 6TH ST FEB 181-383-8881-6:28314 MERCEDES S JAN 196-025-0344-3:42081 MAIN ST FEB 129-535-4236-7:41000 MAIN ST FEB 129-582-9784-3:43230 BUS PARK DR FEB 133-040-7373-0:43210 BUS PARK DR FEB 091-024-9300-5:30875 RANCHO VIST FEB 028-025-1468-3:41375 MCCABE CT 187944 03/08/2018 020528 SOCAL FIRE PREVENTION PUBLIC DISPLAY FIREWORKS REG 4/3 OFFICERS MA/JH 187945 03/08/2018 017142 SOCCER TOURNAMENT REFUND:SPORTS - TOURNAMENT DEPOSIT 130.19 131.89 92.69 273.01 114.13 227.01 206.49 166.29 1,587.96 178.50 18.04 3,084.77 52.55 6,263.52 80.00 80.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 187946 03/08/2018 002503 SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY FY 17/18 FLAT FEE/PRIOR YR 127.46 EMISSIONS:C.0 FY 17/18ANN'LOPERATING FEES:CIVIC 378.28 505.74 187947 03/08/2018 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST PEST CONTROL SRVCS:THEATER 94.00 CONTROL INC PEST CONTROL SRVCS:MARG SPLASH I 240.00 334.00 187948 03/08/2018 000293 STADIUM PIZZA INC REFRESHMENTS: WORKFORCE 2/7 41.89 REFRESHMENTS: WORKFORCE 2/6 151.37 REFRESHMENTS: WORKFORCE 1/24 51.50 244.76 187952 03/08/2018 007762 STANDARD INSURANCE BASIC LIFE INSURANCE PAYMENT COMPANY 187953 03/08/2018 012723 STANDARD INSURANCE VOLUNTARY SUPP LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY PAYMENT 187954 03/08/2018 003000 STATE WATER RESOURCE FY 17/18 DREDGE & FILL NPDES CONTROL 9000003023 187955 03/08/2018 016262 STEVE ADAMIAK GOLF INSTRUCTION 8,448.87 8,448.87 1,124.62 1,124.62 200.00 200.00 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190.40 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 187956 03/08/2018 001546 STRAIGHT LINE GLASS AND GLASS REPAIRS: LIBRARY MIRROR, COMPANY INC 504.00 672.00 420.00 1,786.40 2,800.00 2,800.00 Page:13 apChkLst Final Check List 03/08/2018 9:54:35AM CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 14 Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 187957 03/08/2018 009061 STURDIVANT, ANGELA P. TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 187958 03/08/2018 013387 SWEEPING UNLIMITED INC FEB SWEEPING SRVCS: PARKING GARAGE 708.40 708.40 540.00 540.00 187959 03/08/2018 020520 TAPANES, MARLENE REFUND:SEC DEP:RM RENTAL:TCC 200.00 200.00 187960 03/08/2018 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 UNION DUES PAYMENT 5,037.00 5,037.00 187961 03/08/2018 011275 TEM. VLY GIRLS SOFTBALL REFUND:SEC DEP:2011 TOURNAMENT 1,000.00 1,000.00 ASSOC. 187962 03/08/2018 020515 TEMECULA VALLEY SOCCER REFUND:SEC DEP:TOURNAMENTS 1,000.00 ASSOC 187963 03/08/2018 020512 TOPP'S SPORTS INC REFUND:SEC DEP:PHBSP SOCCER FIEL 1,000.00 2,000.00 REFUND:SEC DEP:TOURNAMENTS 1,000.00 REFUND:SEC DEP:PHBSP BALL FIELD 1 187964 03/08/2018 004124 TRUELINE CONSTRUCTION & CRACK REPAIR & CAULKING: SKATE PARK 187965 03/08/2018 007766 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT, OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA FEB UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATOR ALERTS:P 187966 03/08/2018 014486 VERIZON WIRELESS 1/16-2/15 CELLULAR/BROADBAND USAGE 187967 03/08/2018 020521 VINOLE, MARY ANN REFUND:SEC DEP:KITCHEN RENTAL:CRC 187968 03/08/2018 020275 WALLACE & ASSOC JAN 1 -FEB 4, '18 CONSTR CONSULTING INC MGMT:PARK&RIDE 187969 03/08/2018 001342 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY INC CLEANING SUPPLIES:VARIOUS PARKS CLEANING SUPPLIES:VARIOUS PARKS CLEANING SUPPLIES:CITY FACS 187970 03/08/2018 003730 WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC 2/1-15/18 TREE MAINT:PARKS & MEDIANS 2/1-15/18 TREE MAINT:ROW TREES 1/16-31/18 TREE MAINT:ROW TREES 2/1-15/18 TREE MAINT:CROWNE HILL SL( 2/1-15/18 TREE MAINT:WOLF CREEK SLC 187971 03/08/2018 020011 WHANG, JOANN J THEATER PERFORMANCE: MAR 10, 2018 250.00 1,250.00 2,212.00 2,212.00 214.60 214.60 6,979.03 6,979.03 200.00 200.00 5,304.00 5,304.00 193.18 61.16 362.83 1,140.00 3,515.00 12, 001.00 12, 015.00 11, 926.00 617.17 40,597.00 930.00 930.00 Page:14 apChkLst Final Check List 03/08/2018 9:54:35AM CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 15 Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 187972 03/08/2018 000341 WILLDAN ASSOCIATES INC JUN '17 TRAFFIC ENG SRVCS:BTRFLD 9,815.00 9,815.00 STG RD 1001982 02/28/2018 018343 GARCIA, LYDIA REFUND:CREDIT ON ACCT:TCSD 48.00 48.00 1001983 02/28/2018 020524 HINOSTROZA, MAIRA REFUND:SEC DEP: RM RENTAL:TCC 200.00 200.00 1001984 02/28/2018 020525 RODRIGUEZ, CRISTIN REFUND:CREDIT ON ACCT:TCSD 44.00 44.00 1001985 02/28/2018 020526 MARASCO, TERESA REFUND:CREDIT ON ACCT:TCSD 376.20 376.20 Grand total for UNION BANK: 1,143,614.99 Page:15 apChkLst Final Check List 03/08/2018 9:54:35AM CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 16 163 checks in this report. Grand Total All Checks. 1,143, 614.99 Page:16 Item No. 4 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Jennifer Hennessy, Director of Finance DATE: March 27, 2018 SUBJECT: Approve the City Treasurer's Report as of January 31, 2018 PREPARED BY: Rudy J. Graciano, Fiscal Services Manager RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve and file the City Treasurer's Report as of January 31, 2018. BACKGROUND: Government Code Sections 53646 and 41004 require reports to the City Council regarding the City's investment portfolio, receipts, and disbursements respectively. Adequate funds will be available to meet budgeted and actual expenditures of the City for the next six months. Current market values are derived from the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) reports, Union Bank of California trust and custody statements, and from US Bank trust statements. Attached is the City Treasurer's Report that provides this information. The City's investment portfolio is in compliance with the statement of investment policy and Government Code Sections 53601 and 53635 as of January 31, 2018. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: City Treasurer's Report as of January 31, 2018 Cash and Investments Report CITY OF TEMECULA Through January 2018 Fund # Fund Name Beginning Balance Receipts Disbursements Fund Total 001 GENERAL FUND $ 35,106,654.29 $ 12,932,690.92 $ 13,359,394.76 $ 34,679,950.45 002 MEASURE S FUND 2,099,785.18 2,246,563.07 990,086.88 3,356,261.37 100 STATE GAS TAX FUND 203,274.29 341,756.05 545,030.34 - 102 RMRA-ROAD MAINTENANCE REHABILITATION ACT 18,724.64 9.64 18,715.00 120 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FUND 5,301,927.99 152,064.80 2,807.39 5,451,185.40 125 PEG PUBLIC EDUCATION & GOVERNMENT 306,398.23 9,621.14 20,809.81 295,209.56 145 TEMECULA ENERGY EFFICIENCY ASSET TEAM 198,024.33 393.74 102.13 198,315.94 150 AB 2766 FUND 25,264.36 222.35 13.12 25,473.59 160 SUPPLEMENTAL LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES 8,291.54 8,461,48 16,753.02 161 TEMECULA MAJOR CRIMES REWARD FUND 25,701.97 61.78 13.26 25,750.49 165 AFFORDABLE HOUSING 750,355.91 127,621.24 29,012.45 848,964.70 170 MEASURE A FUND 3,372,632.24 219,416.93 64,831.50 3,527,217.67 190 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 107,797.22 2,518,305.01 1,822,763.67 803,338.56 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "B" STREET LIGHTS - 322,008.00 74,262.39 247,745.61 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "D" REFUSE/RECYCLING 360,411.46 3,979,851.11 13,770.09 4,326,492.48 195 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "R" STREET/ROAD MAINT 23,730.49 2,923.57 13.72 26,640.34 196 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "L" LAKE PARK MAINT. 277,921.29 123,609.83 20,973.02 380,558.10 197 TEMECULA LIBRARY FUND 169,910.13 14,189.05 97,209.26 86,889.92 198 PUBLIC ART 100,570.25 1,243.95 7,248.70 94,565.50 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FUND 13,670,225.73 796,705.57 1,609,991.54 12,856,939.76 275 CFD 03-3 WOLF CREEK IMPROVEMENT FUND 298,713.91 269.19 298,983.10 277 CFD-RORIPAUGH 16,369,645.25 58,731.88 70.69 16,428,306.44 278 CFD-RORIPAUGH II 6,446,000.93 5,808.91 - 6,451,809.84 300 INSURANCE FUND 150,470.48 277,080.96 10,247.66 417,303.78 305 WORKER'S COMPENSATION 975,203.53 131,296.45 58,470.00 1,048,029.98 310 VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT FUND 1,786,691.78 22,003.18 931.01 1,807,763.95 320 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY - 354,925.43 169,073.20 185,852.23 325 TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT FUND 337,832.06 510,603.19 24,807.83 823,627.42 330 CENTRAL SERVICES 378,817.38 72,268.29 17,230.82 433,854.85 340 FACILITIES 352,373.28 252,930.87 91,895.72 513,408.43 380 SARDA DEBT SERVICE FUND 97,155,925.19 1,477,380.76 53,337,475.82 45,295,830.13 381 REDEVELOPMEN PROPERTY TAX TRUST - 3,958,294.82 981,535.98 2,976,758.84 460 CFD 88-12 DEBT SERVICE FUND 90,228.30 128.04 46.51 90,309.83 472 CFD 01-2 HARVESTON A&B DEBT SERVICE 607,807.23 520,988.87 439.96 1,128,356.14 473 CFD 03-1 CROWNE HILL DEBT SERVICE FUND 1,763,851.76 430,887.60 9,182.95 2,185,556.41 474 AD 03-4 JOHN WARNER ROAD DEBT SERVICE 70,080.42 56,206.76 191.16 126,096.02 475 CFD 03-3 WOLF CREEK DEBT SERVICE FUND 1,991,936.06 983,897.82 839.25 2,974,994.63 476 CFD 03-6 HARVESTON 2 DEBT SERVICE FUND 360,072.88 164,480.70 257.11 524,296.47 477 CFD 03-02 RORIPAUGH DEBT SERVICE FUND 806,729.59 390,691.42 384.67 1,197,036.34 478 CFD-RORIPAUGH II 3,206,254.98 1,873,529.65 2,050.75 5,077,733.88 501 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 1 SADDLEWOOD 19,599.88 9,908.51 9,691.37 502 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 2 WINCHESTER CREEK 62,452.06 21,990.32 2,608.23 81,834.15 503 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 3 RANCHO HIGHLANDS 25,160.59 2,492.33 22,668.26 504 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 4 THE VINEYARDS 742.23 3,320.48 539.86 3,522.85 505 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 5 SIGNET SERIES 3,344.78 21,184.27 2,843.09 21,685.96 506 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 6 WOODCREST COUNTRY 12,710.09 13,350.32 1,367.34 24,693.07 508 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 8 VILLAGE GROVE 27,860.91 71,333.46 4,564.16 94,630.21 509 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 9 RANCHO SOLANA 21,301.67 2,683.62 308.48 23,676.81 510 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 10 MARTINIQUE 6,291.64 5,738.63 1,781.29 10,248.98 511 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 11 MEADOWVIEW 1,316.92 1,141.40 194.57 2,263.75 512 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 12 VINTAGE HILLS 43,052.34 49,689.39 4,151.11 88,590.62 513 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 13 PRESLEY DEVELOP 3,156.04 17,330.92 863.35 19,623.61 514 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 14 MORRISON HOMES 7,962.61 1,626.55 6,336.06 515 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 15 BARCLAY ESTATES 38.29 4,978.07 766.18 4,250.18 516 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 16TRADEWINDS 31,996.55 19,079.05 532.15 50,543.45 517 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 17 MONTE VISTA 181.87 982.14 185.21 978.80 518 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 18 TEMEKU HILLS 3,539.21 50,546.62 7,111.21 46,974.62 519 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 19 CHANTEMAR 68,373.42 29,585.09 3,253.21 94,705.30 520 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 20 CROWNE HILL 85,223.29 91,083.50 3,223.81 173,082.98 521 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 21 VAIL RANCH 98,803.70 116,768.43 4,167.63 211,404.50 522 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 22 SUTTON PLACE 3,708.28 2,122.76 297.65 5,533.39 523 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 23 PHEASENT RUN 10,884.89 3,896.01 142.06 14,638.84 524 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 24 HARVESTON 3,756.70 94,860.18 31,505.78 67,111.10 525 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 25 SERENA HILLS 30,010.99 22,864.55 3,370.53 49,505.01 526 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 26 GALLERYTRADITION 11.37 954.73 80.40 885.70 527 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 27 AVONDALE 3,934.85 4,851.27 926.94 7,859.18 528 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 28 WOLF CREEK 314,530.89 120,022.38 4,240.75 430,312.52 530 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 30 FUTURE ZONES 34,299.29 79.54 17.70 34,361.13 Grand Total: $ 196,129,034.18 $ 36,181,999.23 $ 73,473,297.86 $ 158,837,735.55 Journal Entries completed atter December's Treasurer's Report was issued are reflected in the Receipts / Disbursements columns. Investments Managed Pool Accounts Retention Escrow Account Letter of Credit Local Agency Investment Funds Federal Agency Callable Securities Federal Agency Bullet Securities Investments City of Temecula, California Portfolio Management Portfolio Summary January 31, 2018 City of Temecula 41000 Main Street P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92590 (951)694-6430 Par Market Book % of Days to YTM YTM Value Value Value Portfolio Term Maturity 360 Equiv. 365 Equiv. 43,250,538.99 43,250,538.99 43,250,538.99 27.33 1 1 1.244 1.261 33,915,076.03 33,915,076.03 33,915,076.03 21.43 1 1 1.504 1.525 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 1 1 0.000 0.000 49,081,720.16 48,988,147.28 49,081,720.16 31.02 1 1 1.332 1.350 23,000,000.00 22,674,850.00 23,000,000.00 14.53 1,291 825 1.534 1.556 9,000,000.00 8,927,130.00 9,000,000.00 5.69 996 455 1.374 1.393 158,247,337.18 157,755,744.30 158,247,337.18 100.00% 245 147 1.377 1.396 Cash Passbook/Checking (not included in yield calculations) Total Cash and Investments 1,081,991.25 1,081,991.25 1,081,991.25 1 1 0.000 0.000 159,329,328.43 158,837,735.55 159,329,328.43 245 147 1.377 1.396 Total Earnings January 31 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date Current Year Average Daily Balance Effective Rate of Return 160,011.14 149,636,003.92 1.26% Reporting period 01/01/2018-01/31/2018 Run Date: 02/27/2018 - 16:34 812,834.18 136,016,031.62 1.01% Portfolio TEME CP PM (PRF_PM1) 7.3.0 Report Ver. 7.3.6.1 CUSIP Investment # Managed Pool Accounts 233358006-6 233358000-6 276213009-6 276213008-6 276213006-6 164741008-6 164741006-6 164741000-6 164742000-6 229462007-6 229462009-6 229462006-6 229462000-6 94669921-6 94669911-6 94669917-6 94669916-6 94669000-6 276213002-6 276213000-6 94686001-6 94686005-6 94686000-6 94686006-6 276213022-6 276213023-6 276213029-6 276213028-6 276213026-6 276213020-6 218848008-6 218848013-2 218848009-6 233358009-6 94434160-6 94434161-6 Run Date: 02/27/2018 - 16:30 Issuer Average Balance City of Temecula, California Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments January 31, 2018 Page 1 Purchase Stated YTM YTM Days to Maturity Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate 360 365 Maturity Date 01-2 REF RES First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 507,065.03 507,065.03 507,065.03 1.200 1.184 1.200 1 01-2 REF ST First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 69,314.37 69,314.37 69,314.37 1.200 1.184 1.200 1 03-02 COI First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 03-02 IMPR First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 1,141,206.79 1,141,206.79 1,141,206.79 1.200 1.184 1.200 1 03-02 RES First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 744,633.79 744,633.79 744,633.79 1.200 1.184 1.200 1 03-03IMP First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 298,983.10 298,983.10 298,983.10 1.200 1.184 1.200 1 03-03RES First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 392.62 392.62 392.62 1.200 1.184 1.200 1 03-03SPEC First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 194,581.37 194,581.37 194,581.37 1.200 1.184 1.200 1 03-06SPEC First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 13,878.45 13,878.45 13,878.45 1.200 1.184 1.200 1 03-1 2012 RF First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 07/01/2017 41.52 41.52 41.52 1.200 1.184 1.200 1 03-1 COI First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 07/31/2017 13,582.37 13,582.37 13,582.37 1.200 1.184 1.200 1 03-1 RESERV First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 07/31/2017 17,291.41 17,291.41 17,291.41 1.200 1.184 1.200 1 03-1 SPECF First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 07/31/2017 22,327.87 22,327.87 22,327.87 1.200 1.184 1.200 1 03-1ACQ11 First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.870 0.858 0.870 1 03-1ACQA11 First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 03-1 RES First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 07/01/2017 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 03-1 RESB11 First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 03-1SPTAX11 First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 03-2 REFU First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 08/01/2017 2,786.17 2,786.17 2,786.17 1.200 1.184 1.200 1 03-2 SPEC First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 5,001.44 5,001.44 5,001.44 1.200 1.184 1.200 1 03-4ADMIN11 First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 512.46 512.46 512.46 1.200 1.184 1.200 1 03-4PREP11 First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 13.10 13.10 13.10 1.220 1.203 1.220 1 03-4RED11 First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 31,924.15 31,924.15 31,924.15 1.200 1.184 1.200 1 03-4RES11 First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 34,132.75 34,132.75 34,132.75 1.200 1.184 1.200 1 16-01 BOND F First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 08/01/2017 12,623.89 12,623.89 12,623.89 1.200 1.184 1.200 1 16-01 CAPINT First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.870 0.858 0.870 1 16-01 COI First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 16-01 IMP First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 6,451,809.84 6,451,809.84 6,451,809.84 1.200 1.184 1.200 1 16-01 RESERV First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 3,165,353.25 3,165,353.25 3,165,353.25 1.200 1.184 1.200 1 16-01 SPECF First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 07/01/2017 2,337.12 2,337.12 2,337.12 1.200 1.184 1.200 1 2017ABPRIORP First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 12/01/2017 211,483.84 211,483.84 211,483.84 1.200 1.184 1.200 1 2017B COI First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 12/01/2017 16,627.90 16,627.90 16,627.90 1.200 1.184 1.200 1 2017B_PROJ First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 12/01/2017 12,592,019.01 12,592,019.01 12,592,019.01 1.200 1.184 1.200 1 233358009-6 First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 RDA-02INT First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 RDA-02PRIN First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 Portfolio TEME CP PM (PRF PM2) 7.3.0 Report Ver. 7.3.6.1 CUSIP Investment # Issuer City of Temecula, California Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments January 31, 2018 Average Purchase Balance Date Par Value Market Value Page 2 Stated YTM YTM Days to Maturity Book Value Rate 360 365 Maturity Date Managed Pool Accounts 107886000-6 RDA-O6AINT First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 107886001-6 RDA06APRIN First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 07/01/2017 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 107886010-6 RDA06BINT First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 107886011-6 RDA06BPRIN First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 07/01/2017 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.680 0.671 0.680 1 107886016-6 RDA06BRES First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.940 0.927 0.940 1 107886020-6 RDA07INT First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 107886021-6 RDAO7PRIN First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.930 0.917 0.930 1 107886028-6 RDA07PROJ First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.940 0.927 0.940 1 107886026-6 RDAO7RES First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.940 0.927 0.940 1 136343008-6 RDA10APROJ First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 136343018-6 RDA10BPROJ First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 136343000-6 RDA1OINT First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 1 3634 3001-6 RDA1OPRIN First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 07/01/2017 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 136343006-6 RDA1ORSRV First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 146161000-6 RDA11AINT First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 1 461 61 001-6 RDA11APRIN First Amer Govt Oblig Fund CI 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 94669902-3 03-1 BOND3 First American Treasury 07/01/2017 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 94434160-1 RDA 02 INT1 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.010 0.010 0.010 1 94434161-2 RDA 02 PRIN2 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.010 0.010 0.010 1 136343018-2 RDA 10B CIP2 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.010 0.010 0.010 1 1 461 61008-3 RDA11APROJ Federated Institutional Tax Fr 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.800 0.789 0.800 1 146161006-3 RDA11ARSRV Federated Institutional Tax Fr 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 94669921-5 03-01 ACQ11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.250 0.247 0.250 1 94669911-5 03-01 ACQA11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.250 0.247 0.250 1 94669917-5 03-01 RES Federated Tax Free Obligations 07/01/2017 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 94669906-5 03-01 RESA11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001 0.001 0.001 1 94669916-5 03-01 RESB11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.250 0.247 0.250 1 94669000-5 03-01 SPTAX11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.250 0.247 0.250 1 164742006-5 03-06 RES Federated Tax Free Obligations 07/01/2017 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 164742000-5 03-06 SPEC Federated Tax Free Obligations 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.250 0.247 0.250 1 94669902-5 03 -/bond fd Federated Tax Free Obligations 07/01/2017 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 94686001-5 03-4 ADMIN11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.250 0.247 0.250 1 94686005-5 03-4 PREP11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 07/01/2017 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 94686006-5 03-4 RES11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.250 0.247 0.250 1 94669917-1 03-01-1 RES CA Local Agency Investment Fun 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.350 1.332 1.350 1 276213008-1 03-02 IMP CA Local Agency Investment Fun 15,149,839.34 15,149,839.34 15,149,839.34 1.350 1.332 1.350 1 Run Date: 02/27/2018 - 16:30 Portfolio TEME CP PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 CUSIP Investment # Issuer Average Balance City of Temecula, California Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments January 31, 2018 Purchase Date Par Value Market Value Stated Book Value Rate Page 3 YTM YTM Days to Maturity 360 365 Maturity Date Managed Pool Accounts 164742006-1 229462007-1 94669911-1 94669921-1 744727011-1 164741006-1 107886028-1 107886026-1 136343018-1 229462020-0 233358050-1 03-06 RES -1 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 03-1 2012 RE CA Local Agency Investment Fun 03-1 ACQ A2 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 03-1 ACQ B2 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 03-3 ACQ 2 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 0303-1 RES CA Local Agency Investment Fun RDA 07 PRO -1 CA Local Agency Investment Fun RDA 07 RES -1 CA Local Agency Investment Fun RDA 10B CIP1 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 03-01 CASH USBANK 01-2 SPECESC U.S. Treasury Subtotal and Average 43,216,801.33 07/01/2017 07/01/2017 313,497.10 313,497.10 783,742.77 783,742.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,452,741.49 1, 452, 741.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 794.68 794.68 0.00 0.00 43,250,538.99 43,250,538.99 313,497.10 783,742.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,452,741.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 794.68 0.00 43,250,538.99 1.350 1.332 1.350 1 1.350 1.332 1.350 1 1.350 1.332 1.350 1 1.350 1.332 1.350 1 1.350 1.332 1.350 1 1.350 1.332 1.350 1 1.350 1.332 1.350 1 1.350 1.332 1.350 1 1.350 1.332 1.350 1 0.000 0.000 1 0.360 0.355 0.360 1 1.244 1.261 1 Retention Escrow Account ARMY CORPS Army Corps Union Bank 218848050-0 2002 ESCROW USBANK 218848060-0 2006AESCRO USBANK 218848070-0 2006BESCRO USBANK 218848080-0 2007ESCROW USBANK 146161020-0 2011A CASH USBANK 146161020-2 2011A TREAS USBANK 136343020-0 RDA10B CASH USBANK 229462020-2 03-01 ESCROW U.S. Treasury 136343020-2 RDA1OBTREAS U.S. Treasury Subtotal and Average 35,647,247.06 12/01/2017 12/01/2017 12/01/2017 12/01/2017 12/01/2017 12/01/2017 12/01/2017 07/31/2017 12/01/2017 601, 249.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 532,409.09 18,022,433.38 467,386.36 858,752.93 13,432,844.77 601,249.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 532,409.09 18,022,433.38 467,386.36 858,752.93 13,432,844.77 33,915,076.03 33,915,076.03 601,249.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 532,409.09 18,022,433.38 467,386.36 858, 752.93 13,432,844.77 33,915,076.03 0.150 0.148 0.150 1 0.000 0.000 1 0.000 0.000 1 0.000 0.000 1 0.000 0.000 1 0.000 0.000 1 1.640 1.618 1.640 1 0.000 0.000 1 0.063 0.062 0.063 1 1.640 1.618 1.640 1 1.504 1.525 1 Letter of Credit 218848006-1 233358006-1 2017B RESER 01-2 REFRESI ASSURED GUARANTY MUNICIPAL COR 12/01/2017 1.00 ASSURANCE CO BOND INSURANCE 07/01/2017 1.00 Subtotal and Average 3.65 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.000 0.000 1 1.00 0.000 0.000 1 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.000 0.000 1 Local Agency Investment Funds SYSCITY SYSRDA SYSTCSD Run Date: 02/27/2018 - 16:30 CITY RDA TCSD CA Local Agency Investment Fun CA Local Agency Investment Fun CA Local Agency Investment Fun 2,525,057.95 1,783.31 46,554,878.90 2, 520, 244.00 1,779.91 46,466,123.37 2,525,057.95 1,783.31 46,554,878.90 1.350 1.350 1.350 1.332 1.350 1.332 1.350 1.332 1.350 Portfolio TEME CP PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 CUSIP Investment # Issuer Subtotal and Average Average Balance 31,305,831.86 City of Temecula, California Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments January 31, 2018 Purchase Date Par Value Market Value 49,081,720.16 48,988,147.28 Stated Book Value Rate 49,081,720.16 Page 4 YTM YTM Days to Maturity 360 365 Maturity 1.332 1.350 1 Date Federal Agency Callable Securities 3130A4G89 3130AAME5 3130AANA2 3130AAW 38 3130AB3N4 3130ABYY6 3130ACN83 3130ADFV9 3134G67C1 3134G8QB8 3134G8PP8 3134GAXX7 3134GBA88 3134GBGZ9 3134GBNK4 3134GBL42 3134GBR95 3136G2EC7 3136G2WT0 3136G2XH5 3136G3CL7 3136G3TE5 3136G3X59 01207 01226 01227 01228 01231 01235 01238 01241 01210 01219 01220 01224 01229 01232 01234 01237 01239 01205 01216 01217 01218 01221 01222 Federal Home Loan Bank Federal Home Loan Bank Federal Home Loan Bank Federal Home Loan Bank Federal Home Loan Bank Federal Home Loan Bank Federal Home Loan Bank Federal Home Loan Bank Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp Federal National Mtg Assn Federal National Mtg Assn Federal National Mtg Assn Federal National Mtg Assn Federal National Mtg Assn Federal National Mtg Assn Subtotal and Average 22,096,774.19 03/24/2015 1,000,000.00 989,840.00 1,000,000.00 1.650 1.627 1.650 600 09/24/2019 01/30/2017 1,000,000.00 975,430.00 1,000,000.00 2.020 1.948 1.975 1,454 01/25/2022 01/30/2017 1,000,000.00 984,870.00 1,000,000.00 1.750 1.726 1.750 910 07/30/2020 03/22/2017 1,000,000.00 990,010.00 1,000,000.00 1.500 1.479 1.500 1,510 03/22/2022 04/28/2017 1,000,000.00 986,620.00 1,000,000.00 1.550 1.529 1.550 635 10/29/2019 08/24/2017 1,000,000.00 978,020.00 1,000,000.00 1.750 1.726 1.750 1,119 02/24/2021 10/30/2017 1,000,000.00 987,040.00 1,000,000.00 1.700 1.677 1.700 834 05/15/2020 01/29/2018 1,000,000.00 995,910.00 1,000,000.00 2.250 2.219 2.250 1,093 01/29/2021 06/22/2015 1,000,000.00 998,660.00 1,000,000.00 1.200 1.184 1.200 141 06/22/2018 03/29/2016 1,000,000.00 991,540.00 1,000,000.00 1.270 1.253 1.270 421 03/29/2019 03/30/2016 1,000,000.00 980,120.00 1,000,000.00 1.500 1.661 1.684 972 09/30/2020 11/30/2016 1,000,000.00 992,670.00 1,000,000.00 1.000 0.986 1.000 302 11/30/2018 03/27/2017 1,000,000.00 985,040.00 1,000,000.00 1.670 1.647 1.670 785 03/27/2020 04/27/2017 1,000,000.00 978,000.00 1,000,000.00 2.000 1.964 1.991 1,456 01/27/2022 05/30/2017 1,000,000.00 985,520.00 1,000,000.00 1.625 1.603 1.625 848 05/29/2020 09/28/2017 1,000,000.00 980,560.00 1,000,000.00 1.670 1.647 1.670 970 09/28/2020 10/30/2017 1,000,000.00 991,280.00 1,000,000.00 1.625 1.603 1.625 636 10/30/2019 02/27/2015 1,000,000.00 992,650.00 1,000,000.00 1.300 1.282 1.300 391 02/27/2019 01/27/2016 1,000,000.00 986,250.00 1,000,000.00 1.450 1.430 1.450 725 01/27/2020 02/24/2016 1,000,000.00 984,390.00 1,000,000.00 1.400 1.381 1.400 753 02/24/2020 03/24/2016 1,000,000.00 978,560.00 1,000,000.00 1.420 1.401 1.420 966 09/24/2020 06/29/2016 1,000,000.00 977,320.00 1,000,000.00 1.250 1.233 1.250 879 06/29/2020 08/23/2016 1,000,000.00 984,550.00 1,000,000.00 1.100 1.085 1.100 568 08/23/2019 23,000,000.00 22,674,850.00 23,000,000.00 1.534 1.556 825 Federal Agency Bullet Securities 3133EDNDO 3133EEHU7 3133EGJ30 3130A4AJ1 3130A5MH9 3130A8ZV8 3130AAYM4 3130ABDX1 Run Date: 02/27/2018 - 16:30 01196 01202 01225 01206 01211 01223 01230 01233 Federal Farm Credit Bank Federal Farm Credit Bank Federal Farm Credit Bank Federal Home Loan Bank Federal Home Loan Bank Federal Home Loan Bank Federal Home Loan Bank Federal Home Loan Bank 06/11/2014 01/14/2015 11/18/2016 02/27/2015 06/26/2015 08/23/2016 03/14/2017 05/24/2017 0.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 1.200 1.179 1.195 11 01/11/2018 995,620.00 1,000,000.00 1.410 1.391 1.410 347 01/14/2019 981,150.00 1,000,000.00 1.100 1.085 1.100 655 11/18/2019 999,910.00 1,000,000.00 1.140 1.124 1.140 26 02/27/2018 994,870.00 1,000,000.00 1.360 1.341 1.360 328 12/26/2018 980,590.00 1,000,000.00 1.000 0.986 1.000 568 08/23/2019 999,740.00 1,000,000.00 1.125 1.110 1.125 41 03/14/2018 991,950.00 1,000,000.00 1.400 1.381 1.400 477 05/24/2019 Portfolio TEME CP PM (PRF PM2) 7.3.0 CUSIP City of Temecula, California Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments January 31, 2018 Page 5 Average Purchase Stated YTM YTM Days to Maturity Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate 360 365 Maturity Date Federal Agency Bullet Securities 3130AC3F9 01236 Federal Home Loan Bank 08/10/2017 1,000,000.00 3130ADEB4 01240 Federal Home Loan Bank 01/12/2018 1,000,000.00 989,370.00 1,000,000.00 1.420 1.853 1.878 573 08/28/2019 993,930.00 1,000,000.00 2.125 2.096 2.125 1,076 01/12/2021 Subtotal and Average 8,967,741.94 9,000,000.00 8,927,130.00 9,000,000.00 1.374 1.393 455 Run Date: 02/27/2018 - 16:30 Total and Average 149,636,003.92 158,247,337.18 157,755,744.30 158,247,337.18 1.377 1.396 147 Portfolio TEME CP PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 CUSIP Investment * Issuer Average Balance City of Temecula, California Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Cash January 31, 2018 Purchase Date Par Value Passbook/Checking Accounts 1453718479 SYSPetty Cash SYSGen Ck Acct SYSParking Ck WORKERS COMP BANK OF AMERICA MERRILL LYNC Petty Cash City of Temecula Gen Ck Acct Union Bank of California PARKING CITA Union Bank of California Average Balance 0.00 07/01/2017 07/01/2017 07/01/2017 26,505.57 3,311.00 1,044,370.93 7,803.75 Market Value 26,505.57 3,311.00 1,044,370.93 7,803.75 Stated Book Value Rate YTM YTM Days to 360 365 Maturity Page 6 26,505.57 3,311.00 1,044,370.93 7,803.75 0.000 0.000 1 0.000 0.000 1 0.000 0.000 1 0.000 0.000 1 Total Cash and Investments 149,636,003.92 Run Dale: 02/27/2018 - 16:30 159, 329, 328.43 158, 837, 735.55 159,329,328.43 1.377 1.398 147 Portfolio TEME CP PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 Item No. 5 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Charlie DeHart, Division Chief DATE: March 27, 2018 SUBJECT: Approve an Agreement with Raceway Ford, Inc. for the Purchase of Four (4) 2018 4X4 Ford Escapes PREPARED BY: Wendy Miller, Administrative Assistant RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve an Agreement with Raceway Ford, Inc., in the amount of $103,716, for the purchase of four (4) 2018 4X4 Ford Escapes. BACKGROUND: On October 02, 2017 the Fire Department electronically opened and publicly posted on the City of Temecula's online bidding service, Planetbids, a Request for Quotes (RFQ) for the purchase of five (5) 2018 4X4 Ford Escapes. We received one (1) responsive bid on or before October 20, 2017, submission deadline. The solicitation included the City's local preference program; however, it did not impact the award of the purchase. Raceway Ford, Inc was the only responsive bidder. FISCAL IMPACT: The purchase amount of the four (4) 2018 Ford Escape 4X4 is funded with Measure S revenue and included in Fiscal Year 2017-18 Annual Operating Budget. ATTACHMENTS: Agreement AGREEMENT FOR PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT BETWEEN CITY OF TEMECULA AND RACEWAY FORD 2018 FORD 4X4 ESCAPE FLEET VEHICLES THIS AGREEMENT is made and effective as of March 27, 2018 between the City of Temecula , a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and Raceway Ford, Inc. a Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Vendor"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. TERM This Agreement shall commence on March 27, 2018, and shall remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event Tater than June 30, 2018, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. 2. PURCHASE AND SALE OF EQUIPMENT On and subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement and the Agreement Documents, Vendor agrees to sell and deliver to City four (4) Ford 4X4 Escape vehicles, as more particularly described in Exhibit A, Description of Equipment / Scope of Work (hereafter "Equipment"), attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. 3. PURCHASE PRICE The Purchase Price which City agrees to pay to Vendor for the Equipment is One Hundred and three thousand, seven hundred and sixteen Dollars and zero cents ($103,716.00). The Purchase Price is final and shall be paid by City to Vendor within thirty (30) days upon receipt of non -disputed invoice. 4. REPRESENTATION AND WARRANTIES OF VENDOR Vendor makes the following representations and warranties to City: a. Authority and Consents. Vendor has the right, power, legal capacity and authority to enter into and perform its obligations under this Agreement. No approvals or consents of any persons are necessary in connection with Vendor's execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement, except for such as have been obtained on or prior to the date hereof. The execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement by Vendor have been duly authorized by all necessary action on the part of Vendor and constitute the legal, valid and binding obligations of Vendor, enforceable against Vendor in accordance with their respective terms. b. Title, License and Operating Condition. Vendor has good and marketable title to all of the Equipment. All of the Equipment is free and clear of any restrictions on or conditions to transfer or assignment, and City will acquire absolute title to all of the Equipment free and clear of mortgages, liens, pledges, charges, encumbrances, equities, claims, covenants, conditions and restrictions except for such as may be created or granted by City. All of the Equipment is in good operating condition, is free of any defects, and is in conformity with the specifications, descriptions, representations and warranties set forth in the Agreement Documents. Vendor is aware that City is purchasing the Equipment for use as Fire department 12/28/2017 inspector vehicles, and that City is relying on the warranties of the Vendor that the Equipment is fit for this purpose and the ordinary purposes for which the Equipment is normally used. c. Full Disclosure. None of the representations and warranties made by Vendor in this Agreement contains or will contain any untrue statements of a material fact, or omits to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading. 5. TIME OF DELIVERY The date and time of delivery of the Equipment shall be on or before within 30-60 days of receipt of purchase order. 6. PLACE OF DELIVERY The Equipment shall be delivered to the following location City of Temecula Fire Department 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 TITLE AND RISK OF LOSS Title to and the risk of loss, damage and destruction of the Equipment shall remain with the Vendor until after inspection and acceptance of the Equipment by City. 7. INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE City shall inspect the Equipment at the time and place of delivery. Such inspection may include reasonable tests and use of the Equipment by City. If, in the determination of City, the Equipment fails to conform to the Agreement IN ANY MANNER OR RESPECT, City shall so notify Vendor within ten (10) days of delivery of the Equipment to City. Failing such notice, the Equipment shall be deemed accepted by City as of the date of receipt. 8. REJECTION In the event of such notice of non -conformity by City pursuant to the section entitled "Acceptance" above, City may, at its option, (1) reject the whole of the Equipment, (2) accept the whole of the Equipment, or (3) accept any commercial unit or units of the Equipment and reject the remainder. The exercise of any of the above options shall be "without prejudice" and with full reservation of any rights and remedies of City attendant upon a breach. In the event of such notice and election by City, City agrees to comply with all reasonable instructions of Vendor and, in the event that expenses are incurred by City in following such instructions, Vendor shall indemnify City in full for such expenses. 9. NO REPLACEMENTS OF CURE This Agreement calls for strict compliance. Vendor expressly agrees that both the Software tendered and the tender itself will conform fully to the terms and conditions of the Agreement on the original tender. In the event of rejection by City of the whole of the Software or any part thereof pursuant to the section entitled "Rejection" above, City may, but is not required 2 12/28/2017 to, accept any substitute performance from Vendor or engage in subsequent efforts to affect a cure of the original tender by Vendor. 10. MAINTENANCE Vendor shall maintain the Equipment in accordance with the terms of the maintenance schedule attached hereto as Exhibit B, and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full. In performing the maintenance of the Equipment, Vendor shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of Vendor hereunder in meeting its maintenance obligations under this Agreement. 11. INDEMNIFICATION Vendor agrees to defend, indemnify, protect, and hold harmless, the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, and its officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers, from and against any and all claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, actions, liability or damages of any kind and nature which the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, its officers, agents, employees, and volunteers may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of Vendor's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions arising out of or in any way related to the Work or the Vendor's performance or non-performance of this Agreement, excepting only liability out of the sole negligence of the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency. 12. AGREEMENT DOCUMENTS a. This Agreement includes the following documents, which are by this reference incorporated herein and made a part hereof: • Description of Equipment / Scope of Work (from the Request for Proposal (RFP), attached hereto as Exhibit A • Response/Quotation to the Request for Proposal (RFP), attached hereto as Exhibit B b. In the event any term or condition of the Agreement Documents conflicts with or is contradictory to any term or condition of the Agreement, the terms and conditions of this Agreement are controlling. c. In the event of a conflict in terms between this Agreement, the Request for Proposal (RFP) and/or the Vendor's response to the RFP, this Agreement shall prevail over the RFP and the Vendor's response to the RFP. 13. REMEDIES The remedies and rights conferred on the City by this Agreement are in addition to and cumulative with all other remedies and rights accorded the City under law or equity. 14. SURVIVAL OF RERESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES 3 12/28/2017 All representations, warranties, covenants and agreements of the parties contained in this Agreement shall survive the execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement. 15. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES The Vendor shall keep itself informed of State and Federal laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Vendor shall at all times observe and comply with all such laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Vendor to comply with this section. 16. ASSIGNMENT The Vendor shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of the City. This Agreement shall be binding on, and shall inure to the benefit of, the parties to it and their respective heirs, legal representatives, successors and assigns. Upon termination of the Agreement, Vendor's sole compensation shall be payment for actual equipment received. 17. SEVERABILITY If any provision of this Agreement is held invalid or unenforceable by any court of final jurisdiction, it is the intent of the parties that all other provisions of this Agreement be construed to remain fully valid, enforceable, and binding on the parties. 18. PROHIBITED INTEREST No officer, or employee of the City of Temecula that has participated in the development of this agreement or its approval shall have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, the proceeds thereof, the Vendor, or Vendor's sub -Contractors for this project, during his/her tenure or for one year thereafter. The Vendor hereby warrants and represents to the City that no officer or employee of the City of Temecula that has participated in the development of this agreement or its approval has any interest, whether contractual, non -contractual, financial or otherwise, in this transaction, the proceeds thereof or in the business of the Vendor or Vendor's sub -Contractors on this project. Vendor further agrees to notify the City in the event any such interest is discovered whether or not such interest is prohibited by law or this Agreement. 19. ENTIRE AGREEMENT; MODIFICATION; WAIVER This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties pertaining to the subject matter hereof and thereof and supersedes all prior and contemporaneous agreements, representations and understandings of the parties, whether oral or written. No supplement, modification or amendment of this Agreement or the Agreement Documents shall be binding unless executed in writing by all the parties. No waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement or the Agreement Documents shall be deemed, or shall constitute, a waiver of any other provision, whether or not similar, nor shall any waiver constitute a continuing waiver. No waiver shall be binding unless executed in writing by the party making the waiver. 4 12/28/2017 20. NOTICES Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (i) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice. Notice shall be effective upon delivery to the addresses specified below or on the third business day following deposit with the document delivery service or United States Mail as provided above. Mailing Address: City of Temecula Attn: City Manager 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 To Consultant: Raceway Ford Inc. Attn: Mike Ladner 5900 Sycamore Canyon Blvd Riverside, CA 92507 21. EFFECTS OF HEADINGS The subject headings of the sections and subsections of this Agreement are included for convenience only and shall not affect or be considered in the construction or interpretation of any of its provisions. 22. GOVERNING LAW This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with, and governed by, the laws of the State of California as applied to contracts that are executed and performed entirely in California. The City and Vendor understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties, and liabilities of the parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event such litigation is filed by one party against the other to enforce its rights under this Agreement, the prevailing party, as determined by the court's judgment, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and litigation expenses for the relief granted. 23. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the Vendor warrants and represents that he or she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Vendor and has the authority to bind the Vendor to the performance of its obligation hereunder. The City Manager is authorized to enter into an amendment on behalf of the City to make the following non -substantive modifications to the agreement: (a) name changes; (b) extension of time; (c) non -monetary changes in scope of work; (d) agreement termination. 5 12/28/2017 This page was intentionally left blank. 6 12/28/2017 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF TEMECULA By: Matt Rahn, Mayor ATTEST: Raceway Ford, Inc. (Two Signatures of corporate officers required unless corporate documents authorize only one person to sign the agreement on behalf of the corporation.) By: By: By: Randi Johl, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney VENDOR William Chamberlin, Vice President Mike L Raceway Ford, Inc Ieet Manager Mike Ladner 5900 Sycamore Canyon Blvd. Riverside, CA 92507 951-317-2101 mladner@earthlink.net 7 PM Initials Date: 12/28/2017 EXHIBIT A DESCRIPTION OF EQUIPMENT NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION SPECIFICATION INCLUDED (YES/NO) 1. Wheelbase 105.9" 2. Engine • 2.5L Duratec 1-4 Engine 3. Transmission • 6 Speed Select Shift Automatic 4. Steering • Electric Power Assisted Steering 5. Brakes • Power Disc Brakes with ABS 6. Seats • Front bucket seats, rear 60/40 split -fold seats with tip-fold=flat latch cloth 7. Cooling • Factory Standard 8. Battery • Factory Standard 9. Alternator • Factory Standard 10. Color • Exterior— Oxford White • Interior — Charcoal Black Cloth 11 Mirrors • Power Side View mirrors with integrated blind spot mirror and manual fold -way design 12. Suspension • 4 -Wheel independent suspension 13. Warranty • Bumper warranty to include routine maintenance 14. Factory Items • Radio AM/FM CD Player rear view camera • Gauges - Factory Standard • Fuel Tank — 15.1 Gal • Air Condition — Factory Standard • Wheels and Tires — 17" steel wheels with silver wheel covers, P235/55R17 All - Season BSW tires • Rear bumpers — Painted body color 8 12/28/2017 NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION SPECIFICATION INCLUDED (YES/NO) • Transfer case — 4X4 Escape S 16. Special Items • Dealer shall provide all DMV services for permanent registration and supply exempt license plates. • Dealer shall provide four (4) sets of keys for four key fobs • Setina partion that secures cargo area behind the rear seats crossovers, 1-piece vinyl coated 11-guage expanded metal window, 1 1/2 " X 2" extruded aluminum window framework, 14 gauge steel seat back protector panel, rugged zinc-free powder coat finish 17. Options Required • Front and rear stabilizer bar • Torque vectoring control • Adjustable driver and front passenger sun visor • Cargo floor hooks • Two coat hooks • Four cupholders • Front and rear dome lights with map lights and rear cargo lights • Front-row center console with arm rest • Illuminated entry system • Message center • Overhead console with sunglass holder • Power door locks • Power windows • Rear seat in floor storage compartment • Seat side storage trays for driver and passenger • Steering wheel mounted cruise control and audio controls • Tachometer • Three 12 volt power points • Tilt/Telescoping steering column • Rear window defroster • Solar tinted glass • Windshield wipers-front: variable intermittent with washer and rear 2 speaed with washer • Tire pressure monitoring system • Securilock passive anti-theft system • Dual air bags and side curtain air bags Delivery Point: Piece quoted shall include all delivery and unloading charges to the purchaser. Dealer Service: The equipment furnished under this contract shall be completely services by the vendor prior to delivery. It shall be ready for operation when delivered. Any further servicing by the vendor will not be required except in connection with repairs or adjustments covered by the manufacturer or dealer's warranty. Equipment Condition: The vehicle furnished shall be new and unused, current model with standard factory fittings, trim and accessories unless otherwise noted. 9 12/28/2017 EXHIBIT B PAYMENT RATES AND SCHEDULE The Purchase Price which City agrees to pay to Vendor for the Equipment is One Hundred and three thousand, seven hundred and sixteen Dollars and zero cents ($103,716.00) per vendor proposal attached hereto and incorporated herein as those set forth in full. The Purchase Price is final and shall be paid by City to Vendor within thirty (30) days upon receipt of non -disputed invoice. 10 12/28/2017 VENDOR: ADDRESS: EXHIBIT B Con't Ford 4X4 Escape fleet vehicles RACEWAY FORD 5900 Sycamore Canyon Blvd Riverside, CA 92507 PHONE/FAX: (CI . r\) 2iiLt-"(5S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE: LM \\ (no 1c,r SIG RE: FORD 4X4 ESCAPE MAKE: rO COLOR: 1A -Na VEHICLE PRICE: EOUIPMENT PRICE: SALES TAX: f : TOTAL PRICE: MODEL: CV No- -Lick YEAR: ZZo.e. -2-3111-C. 2l.L 2 (o, I s -I. c. C.c COSTS STATED WITHIN THE UNIT SALES PRICE ARE ALL-INCLUSIVE FOR SPECIFICATIONS LISTED. SIGNING THIS PROPOSAL GUARANTEES DELIVERY WITHIN 245 DAYS OF RECEIPT OF PURCHASE ORDER. Prepared By: Administrator Your Dealership Name Here 2018 Ford Escape • VEHICLE REPORT SELECTED MODEL Code Description 2018 Ford Escape U9G 4dr 4x4 SE Invoice Dir Price U9G 2018 Ford Escape 4dr 4x4 SE SELECTED VEHICLE COLORS Code Description Interior. CHARCOAL BLACK Exterior 1: OXFORD WHITE Exterior 2: No color has been selected. SELECTED OPTIONS Code Description Class $25, 743.00 $24,934.00 rrepared by: Invoice Dir Price PACKAGES 200A Equipment Group 200A (99D) Engine: 1.5L EcoBoost : Includes auto start -stop technology.; (446) Transmission; 6 -Speed Automatic w/SelectShift; (STDAX) 3.51 Axle Ratio; (STDGV) GVWR: 4,760 (STDTR) Tires: P235/55R17 A/S BSW : Low -Rolling -Resistance. Includes mint spare.; (64N) Wheels: 17' Sparkle Silver -Painted Aluminum: (K) Heated Unique Cloth Front Bucket Seats : Includes 10 -way power driver seat (includes power lumbar and power recline) and 4 -way manual front passenger (fore/aft with manual recline).; (STDRD) Radio: AM/FM Stereo w/Single-CD/MP3 Player: includes 6 speakers, speed compensated volume end SiriusXM radio with a 6 month prepaid subscription. Note: SiriusXM audio and data services each require a subscription sold separately, or as a package, by Sirius XM Radio Inc. If you decide to continue service after your trial, the subscription plan you choose will automatically renew d ychargedu will be acto cour chosen ording pamentt methafter and od at then -current rates. Fees and taxes apply To cancel you must call SiriusXM at 1-866-635-2349. See SiriusXM Customer Agreement for complete terms at wwwsirlusxm.com. All fees and programming subject to change. Sirius, XM and all related marks and logos are trademarks of Sinus XM Radio Inc. OPT 80.00 $0.00 Report content Is based on current data version referenced. My partormance-related ca c1 189ons are offered solely as guidelines Actual unit performance will depend on your operating conditions PC Carbock$t, Data Version: 5.0, Date Updated 0X17/2014 09 1322 PM CCopyright 1988-2012 Chrome Data Solutions, LP All rights reserved Odobar 05.2017 Page 2 . lbs, CSW illi rues f'23:03br. l ; i !', t1;,, I ow RnIlilln l:r'ci.4tnlire torlu'lr•S mint SpFIr'n ili4N1 Wlt: - Prepared By: Administrator Your Dealership Name Here 2018 Ford Escape • VEHICLE REPORT SELECTED OPTIONS Code Description Class 201e Ford Escape U8G 4dr 4x4 SE Invoice Dir Price EMISSIONS 425 50 -State Emissions System STD $0.0?repareCRy POWERTRAIN 99D Engine: 1.5L EcoBoost INC $0.00 $0.00 Includes auto start -stop technology. 446 Transmission: 6 -Speed Automaticw/SelectShilt INC $0.00 $0.00 STDAX 3.51 Axle Ratio INC $0.00 $0.00 STDGV GVWR:4,760lbs INC $0.00 $0.00 WHEELS & TIRES STDTR Tires: P235y55R17 A/S BSW INC $0.00 $0.00 Low -Rolling -Resistance. Includes mini spare. 64N Wheels: 17" Sparkle Silver -Painted Aluminum INC $0.00 $0.00 SEATS & SEAT TRIM K Heated Unique Cloth Front Bucket Seats INC $0.00 $0.00 Includes 10 -way power driver seat (Includes power lumbar and 425 powerregllne) and.4wlay manual front passenger (fore/aft with io 00 $0 00 manual recline). OTHER OPTIONS PAINT Monotone Paint Application STD $0.00 $0.00 106WB 106" Wheelbase STD $0.00 $0.00 STDRD Radio: AM/FM Stereo w/Single-CD/MP3 Player INC $0.00 $0.00 SYNC Communications & Entertainment System : Includes enhanced voice recognition communication , 911 Assist, 4.2" LCD screen in center stack, AppLink and 1 smart charging USB port. Includes 6 speakers, speed compensated volume and SiriusXM radio with a 6 month prepaid subscription. Note: SiriusXM audio and data services each require a subscription sold separately, or as a package, by Sirius XM Radio Inc. If you decide to continue service after your trial, the subscription plan you choose will automatically renew thereafter and you will be charged according to your chosen payment method at then -current rates. Fees and taxes apply. To cancel you must Report content is based on current dela version referenced, Ary performance -related calculations are offered solely as guidelines Actual unit perlormanco will depend on your operating conditions. PC CarbooldID, Data Version: 50, Data updated 0711712014 0913:22 PM 5Copyrighl 1986-2012 Chrome Data Solutio ro, LP All rights reserved October 05, 2017 Page 3 putvui lOCerli:) kr11I1 4 wily 1lhirlrr, 11 burl i n1:11rrrnl rer:bre Prepared By: Administ Your Dealership Name Here 2018 Ford Escape • VEHICLE REPORT SELECTED OPTIONS Code Dtscrlptlon Class 20111 Font Escape U90 Ott 4x4 ae Involct DS' Price OTHER OPTIONS (Continued) cal! SiriusXM at 1-866-635-2349. See SiriusXM Customer Agreement for complete terms at www.siriusxm.com. All fees and programming subject to change. Sirius, XM and all related marks and logos are trademarks of Sirius XM Radio Inc. SiriusXM service is not available in Alaska and Hawaii, 153 Front Llcense Plate Bracket Standard In states requiring two license plates and optional to all others. INTERIOR COLORS FOR : PRIMARY WISE r43 Charcoal Black EXTERIOR COLORS FOR RIMARY W!S� Oxford White OPTIONS TOTAL KB OTHER OPTIONS (Contuluud) AaU SirigwYM :11 f 866.61t3 qty. M r',r::l irnry Oa LIa141• ...V._411:s , UIt t'1♦,„Wirt r Charcoal f31acl. OPT Pr£'n red Ryr• $0.00 OPT 50.00 OPT $000 ;0.00 OPT 80 00 :0.00 S0.00 50.00 50.00 Report content is basad on current data vors on retorenced My performance -totaled calc l Ions are offered solely as gurdelnus Actual un l perltxntanco wit depend on your opureUng condsbons PC Ca/boot, Delo Version 5.0, Data updated 07/17/2014 0913 22 PM CCopynghl 1986-2012 Chro•no Data Soblons, LP An /91115 rosorvod October 06,2017 Page 4 Prepared By: Administrator Your Dealership Name Here 2018 Ford Escape • VEHICLE REPORT PRICING SUMM/\P?Y Price Component 2010 Ford Escape UOG Adr Ax4 SE Invoice Dir Price Base Price $25,743.00 $24,934.00 Total Options $0.00 A .1 G $0.00 / . Adinitlistrator Vehicle Subtotal $25,743.00 $24,934.00 Advert/Adjustments $0.00 $0.00 Destination Charge 3995.00 $995.00 TOTAL VEHICLE PRICE 328,738.00 $25,929.00 Customer Signature /Date Dealer Signature/ Date Report content a based on currant dale uerswn referenced My pertormanco-relalnd calculators are offered solely as gude!inos. Actual unA performance w01 depend on your operating condkoM PC Celbod,e. Oats Vorswn 50. Data updated 07117/2014 09:1322 PAA ¢;Copyrgnl 1996.2012 Chrome Data Solutions, LP M rghis racarvud. Odobsr 05, 2017 Page 1 Prepared By: Administrator Your Dealership Name Here 2018 Ford Escape • VEHICLE REPORT STANDARD EQUIPMENT Powertrain 2018 Ford Escape USG 4dr 4x4 8E • EcoBoost 179hp 1.5L DOHC 16 valve intercooled turbo 1-4 engine with variable valve control, gasoline direct injection • Recommended fuel: regular unleaded • Emissions type: ULEV 11 • 6 speed automatic transmission with overdrive, SelectShift sequential sport shift • Automatic full-time 4 wheel drive • Torque Vectoring Control brake actuated limited slip differential L• Fuel Economy City: 22mpg -_ Yuta !Mrd • -cape • Fuel Economy Highway: 28mpg • Fuel Tank Capacity:: 15.7gai. Suspension/Handling • Front Independent strut suspension with anti -roll bar, gas -pressurized shocks • Reenindependenhshort pncilong arm.suspension with anti -roll bar, gas-prossudzed shocks • Speed -sensing electric power -assist rack -pinion steering • Front and rear 17" x 7.5" silver aluminum wheels • P235y55HR17.0 BSA,AS front and rear tires Body Exterior F,ticr unOmv City.. 22rnp l • Driver and passenger power remote door mirrors • Body -colored door mirrors • Rear lip spoiler Report ccntent is based on currant data versan roloroncod My performance -related calculations aro offered solely as gurd 1.nes Actoai arta perrormanco will depend on your operaling wnd Dons. PC Carl>oolam, Dab Version 6.0. Date updated 07117!2014 05:13:22 PMC' Copyright 19862012 Chrome Data Solutions, LP All rights reserved. Odobor05,2417 • twin eun.lr,,r,n rrf ,d„d. .0 r.: .ra+,r,an. Page Prepared By: Administrator Your Dealership Name Here 2018 Ford Escape • VEHICLE REPORT STANDARD EQUIPMENT Body Exterior (Continued) • Body -colored bumpers • Roof rack rails only • Clearcoat paint Convenience 2015 Ford Escape USG 4dr 4x4 SE •••• .n,r rte,,. • Dual zone front automatic air conditioning with eir filter • Cruise control with steering wheel controls • Power windows • Driver 1 -touch down • Driver 1 -touch up • Remote power door locks with 2 stage unlock and illuminated entry • Manual tilt steering wheel • Manuaktelescopio,steering wheel • Day -night rearview mirror • Internet access • 911 Assist emergency communication system • Wireless phone connectivity CCD •Monitor • Front and rear cupholders • Dual visor vanity mirrors • Full floor console io ruru Lst,diu Report content o basad on current data verson referenced My portormenceielatod carc Iotlora are offered soot' as guidehnee Actual arta potlormonce wilt depend on yotr operating conddrone. PC Corbooke. Data Version 5.0 Dale updalod 07/1712014 0917 22 PM GCopyr ght 1986.20 t2 Chrome Dela Solehons, LP AN rights resorted. October 05, 2017 Page 8 Prepared By: Administrator Your Dealership Name Here 2018 Fotd'E'scape • VEHICLE REPORT STANDARD EQUIPMENT Convenience (Continued) 2016 Ford Escape U90 4dr 4x4 SE • Covered floor storage • Driver and passenger door bins • Rear door bins Seats and Trim • Seating capacity of 5 • Front bucket seats • 8 -way (8 -way power) driver seat adjustment • Power 2 -way driver lumbar support • Power height adjustable driver seat • 4 -way passenger seat adjustment • Center front armrest • Heated:fontseats:10r • 60-40 folding mar split -bench seat • Cloth seat upholstery • Metal -look instrument panel insert • Metal -look console insert Metal-liokeearStilt( Ad(' :;c,rt '1"w • Carpet front and rear floor mats Entertainment Features 2018 Ford Escape • SiriusXMAM/FM/Satellite radio with radio data system Report content is based on current data vors.on referenced Any performance -related celculatone are offered solely as guidol nos Actual unit performance will depend on your operating conditions. PC Corbookelk Oslo Version. 5.0, Date updated 07/17/2014 09 13 22 PM ✓,'.Copyr, ghl 1906.2012 Chrome Data Solutions. LP Alt notes reserved. • I tr:afutl hunt , ' ,1 October 05, 2017 Page 7 Prepared By: Administrator Your Dealership Name Here Ford Escape VEHICLE REPORT STANDARD EQUIPMENT Entertainment Features (Continued) 2018 Ford Escape USG 4dr 4o4 8E • Single CD player • MP3 decoder • SYNC external memory control • Steering wheel mounted radio controls • 6 speakers • Integrated roof antenna Lighting, Visibility and Instrumentation 2018 Ford Escape • Halogen aero -composite headlights • Delay -off headlights • Fully automatic headlights • Front fog lights • Variable intermittent front windshield wipers • Fixed interval rear windshield wiper • Rear window defroster • Fixed rearmost windows • Deep tinted windows F. Ot1ading lightg ; •. • Tachometer • Compass • Outside temperature display Report content is based on current data version referenced. Any performance -related cakWolam ore offered solely es gurdelmes Actual unit performance .vill depend on your operating conditions PC Carbootc2i. Data, Version. 5.0. Data updated 07/172014 09:13:22 PM 49Copyrlght 1988-2012 Clxomo Delo Solutions, LP At rights reserved. • October05, 2017 orifi 1 P rnb•rmdtonl rani r:, r�tr,,/nr!rrl tra� _ Pege 8 Prepared By: Administrator Your Dealership Name Here 2018 Ford Escape • VEHICLE REPORT STANDARD EQUIPMENT Lighting, Visibility and Instrumentation (Continued) 2018 Ford Escape 1190 4dr 4x4 8E • Low tire pressure warning • Trip computer • Trip odometer • Rear camera Safety and Security • 4 -wheel ABS brakes • Brake assist • 4 -wheel disc brakes • AdvanceTrac w/Roll Stability Control electronic stability • ABS and driveline traction control • Dual front impact airbag supplement& restraint system • Dual seat mounted side impact airbag supplemental restraint system • Safety Canopy System curtain 1st and 2nd row overhead airbag supplemental restraint system • Knee airbag supplemental restraint system • Airbag supplemental restraint system occupancy sensor • Power remote door locks with 2 stage unlock and panic alarm g'eunty system with Securllock immobilizer • Manually adjustable front head restraints with lilt • 3 manually adjustable mar head restraints Specs and Dimensions 2018 Ford Escape Raped content os based on currord data version referenced. Any performance -related calculations aro offered solely as ouidetlnes Actual umt pedormanco will depend on your operating conditions PC Ca:book8l, Dale Version 5.0, Data updated 07117/2014 09.13 22 PM OCo, ynghl 1986.2012 Chrome Data Solutions, LP. All rights reserved, October 05, 2017 l,rn.rr ,.r:, 'r' - Page9 • VEHICLE REPORT STANDARD EQUIPMENT Specs and Dimensions (Continued) • Engine displacement: 1.51. • Engine horsepower: 179hp @ 6,000RPM • Engine torque: 177 lb. -ft. @ 2,500RPM • Bore x stroke 3.11"x 3.20" • Compression ratio: 9.99:1 • Gear ratios (1st): 4.58 Gear ratios (2nd): 2.96 Gear ratios (3rd): 1.91 Gear ratios (4th): 1.44 Gear ratios (51h): 1.00 • Gear ratios (8th): 0.74 • Gear ratios (reverse): 2.94 Curb weight: 3, 6451bs. • GVWR. 4,7801bs. • Towing capacity: 2, 000Ibs. • Exterior length: 178.1" • Exterior body width: 72.4" • Exterior height: 66.3" • Wheelbase: 105.9" Prepared Sy: Administrator Your Dealership Name Here 2018 Ford Escape 2018 Ford Escape U90 4dr 484 88 2018 Fa(d Escape Report content is basad on current dela version referenced. My performance4aisled calculations are offered solely as guidelines, Actual unit performance will depend on your operating oofdelana. PC Cerbooka Dale Moreton 6.0, Data updated 07/172014 09:13.22 PM CCopyrigth 1988.2012 Chrome Date Solutions, LP. M nghta reserved. Page 10 October 05,2017 Prepared By: Administrator Your Dealership Name Here 2018 Ford Escape • VEHICLE REPORT STANDARD EQUIPMENT Specs and Dimensions (Continued) 2018 Ford Escape U90 4d r 4x4 SE • Front track: 61.5" • Rear track: 61.6" • Turning radius: 19.4' • Min ground clearance: 7.9" • Front legroom: 43.1" • Rear legroom: 36.8" • Front headroom: 39.9" • Rear headroom: 39.0" • Front hiproom: 54.8" • Rear hiproom:: 52.4" • Front shoulder room: 56.0" • Rear shoulder room: 55.3" • Passenger volume: 98.1 cult. • Approach angle: 21.9 deg • Departure angle: 27.6 deg • Interior cargo volume: 34.3cu.it. • Interior cargo volume seats folded: 67.8cu.ft. • Interior maximum cargo volume: 67.8cu.ft. 71118 Ford Escape Report content is based on current data version referenced. Any performance -related calculations are offered solely as euidolmos. Actual unit performance wilt depend on your operating cant/Mlont. PC Carbook, Date Version 5.0, On1a updated 07/172014 09:1322 PM OCopytlghl 1986.2012 Chrome Dela Solutions, LP. A0 nettle reserved October 05, 2017 Page 11 Prepared By: Administrator Your Dealership Name Here 2018 Ford Escape • VEHICLE REPORT WARRANTY INFORMATION INARRAICY Basic: 36 month/36, 000 miles Powenrein: 60 month/60, 000 miles Corrosion Perforation: 60 month/unlimited mileage Roadside Assistance: 60 month/80,000 miles WARRANTY 2014 Ford Escape 1190 4dr 4x4 BE Repel content s based on curtonl data version referenced Any portormnnce-reletod catcutetions ere offered solely as guidelines Actual umt performance wilt depend on your o;,erulv.p conditio .. PC Corbook•, Dais Version: 5.0. Data updaod 07/17/2014 09 13-22 PM CCopyright 1908.2012 Chrome Data Solutions. LP All rights reserved October 06, 2017 Page 12 Prepared By: Administrator Your Dealership Name Here 2018 Ford Escape • VEHICLE REPORT POWERTRAIN - BASIC SPFCIFICATIONS Engine, 2011 Ford Escape U90 4dr 4x4 SE Engine Order Code Engine type Displacement SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM SAE Net Torque (lb ft) @ RPM Transmission 99D regular unleaded 1-4 1.5091 CID 179 @ 8,000 177 @ 2,500 Transmission order code 448 Transmission Type Description 8 -speed automatic Drive Train four-wheel drive Mileage City EPA Fuel Economy Estimate (MPG) 22.00 HWTEPA`FueTECOnamyEstlmate (MPG) — --- -28.00 ono City cruising range (ml) 345.00 Hwy cruising range (mi) 439.00 • Indicates equipment which Is in addition to or replaces base model's standard equipment. rwy LPA Fuel kconolny LS11111 luC t(vi!'U) Report Content Is based on current data version referenced. My perfamence-related calculations are offered solely as guidelines. Actual unll performance will depend as your operating conditions. PC CarbookA, Data Version: 5.0. Date updated 07/172014 08:13:22 PM CCopyriptil 180E-2012 Chrome Dela Solu8on4 LP. All dghs reserved. ' • nn October 05, 2017 Page 13 • VEHICLE REPORT POWERTRAIN - ADVANCFD SPECIFICATIONE Transmission Gear Ratio (.1) First Gear Ratio (:1) Second Gear Ratio (:1) Third Gear Ratio (:1) Fourth Gear Ratio (:1) Fifth Gear Ratio (:1) Sixth Geer Ratio (:1) Reverse Ratio (:1) Differential Prepared By: Administrator Your Dealership Name Here 2018 Ford Escape 4.58 2.96 1,91 1.44 1.00 0.74 2.94 Front 2018 Ford Escape Uel3 4dr 4x4 SE Rear • --Axle Ratio (:1) 3.51 " Indicates equipment which is in addition to or replaces base model's standard equipment. Reporl collard Is based on arrant Bete version rdarsnried. Any performanco•ralWod calculations are offered solely es gualelnos Actual un 1 performance will depend on your operating conditions PC Carhook4D, Dela Version 5.0, Data updated 07117#2014 09 1322 PM °Copyright 1996.20+2 Chrome Data Solrtions, LP All rights reserved. October 05, 2017 Page 14 • VEHICLE REPORT PAYLOADITRAILERING SPECIFICATIONS Weight Information Front Prepared By: Administrator Your Dealership Name Here 2018 Ford Escape 2010 Ford Escape 1190 4dr 4s4 BE Rear TOTAL Curb Weight (lbs.) 3,645 As Spec'd Curb Weight (lbs.) 3,645 Gross Vehicle Wt Rating (lbs.) Trallering Max Trailer Wt. Max Tongue Load 4,760 Dead Weight Hitch (lbs.) 2,000 Weight Distributing Hitch (lbs.) 2,000 ` Indicates equipment which is in addition to or replaces base model's standard equipment. �,'OdU 'Vb: Iu 1 uicu (lbs Report content is bated on current dale version referenced Any performanoe•roleted calculations are offered solely ea guideMes. Actual unit performance wil depend on your operating conddrons PC Carbook .). Dale Version. 5,0, Dnlo updalcd 07117/2014 09 13 72 PM s?Copynehl 10911.2012 Clrorne Data Solubocs. IP Alt rtghte reserved. 0dcber 05, 2017 Pape 10 Prepared By: Administrator Your Dealership Name Here 2018 Ford Escape • VEHICLE REPORT CHASSIS SP[CIFICATIONS Suspension 2018 Ford Escape 090 4dr Mt SE Front Rear Spring Spring Type Axle Axle Type Brakes coil coil Independent independent ABS System 4 -wheel Front Rear Disc Rotor Diam Tkes yes yes 12.750 12.000 Front Rear Spare Tire Order Code STOTR STDTR Tire Size P235/55R17.0 P235/55R17.0 Wheels Front Rear Spare Wheel Size 17 x 7.5 17 x 7.5 Wheel Type aluminum aluminum Steering Steering Type : electric power -assist Turning Radius Curb -to -Curt, 19.4 Fuel Tank Main Auxiliary Capacity (gal.) 15,7 • Indicates equipment which is In addition to or replaces base model's standard equipment. Iire Size r • . u Repel content is based on current dela version referenced My performance -related calculellons are offered solely as guidelines. Actual unit performance w81 depend on your °pending conditions. PC Crbook®, Dau Version: 5.0. Data updated 07/17/2014 09:1322 PM °Copyright 1986-2012 Chrome Data Solutions, LP. AY rights reserved, October 05, 2017 Pegs 16 Prepared By: Administrator Your Dealership Name Here 2018 Ford Escape • VEHICLE REPORT D1MLNS10NS Extsrlor,DIm.nslons 2018 Ford Escape U00 4dr 4x4 88 Wheelbase () 105.90 Length, Overall w/o rear bumper (") 178.10 Width, Max w/o mirrors () 72.40 Height, Overall () 66.30 Ground Clearance Minimum Ground Clearance () 7.90 Interior Dimensions Passenger Capacity 5 Seating Position Front Second Head Room (in) 39.90 39.00 Leg Room (") 43.10 36.80 Shoulder Room () 56.00 55.30 Hip Room () 54.80 52.40 • Indicates equipment which is in addition to or replaces base model's standard equipment. • Groins `Cloarnnce' Rigid Content le emM MxtwraWed d Roon (in) My �pmenc crewed otladWbns are offered sole g 1'1 J�J panel (Nle conditions. PC Cubed.. Dela dVerebrrel 0, Dale updated 07/17!2014 0913:22 PM OCopyrgh11086.2012 Chrome Dole Solutions. sL LP. All rights reserved will de YOu► October 05, 2017 Pape 17 Item No. 6 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Charlie DeHart, Division Chief DATE: March 27, 2018 SUBJECT: Approve the Second Amendment to the Agreement with Proactive Fire Design and Consulting, Inc. for Fire Department Plan Review Service PREPARED BY: Wendy Miller, Administrative Assistant RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the Second Amendment to the Agreement with Proactive Fire Design and Consulting, Inc., in the amount of $15,000, for Fiscal Year 2017-18 for Fire Department Plan Review Service. BACKGROUND: On July 1, 2015, the City and Consultant entered into that certain Agreement entitled "Agreement for Fire Department Plan Review Service," in the amount of Ninety Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($90,000) annually with the ability, upon mutual agreement to extend the contract for four (4) additional one (1) year terms for a total five year agreement amount of $450,000. On July 1, 2016 the City and Consultant entered into the first amendment to that certain agreement entitled "Agreement for Fire Department Plan Review Services" to extend the term to June 30, 2020. The parties now desire to increase the payment in the amount of $15,000.00 for a total contract amount of $465,000.00. FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate funds are available with the approval of the mid -year Fire Department budget approved by the Council on February 27, 2018. ATTACHMENTS: Amendment SECOND AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF TEMECULA AND PROACTIVE FIRE DESIGN & CONSULTING, INC. FIRE DEPARTMENT PLAN REVIEW SERVICE THIS SECOND AMENDMENT is made and entered into as of March 27, 2018 by and between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and Proactive Fire Design & Consulting, Inc., a Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Consultant"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. This Amendment is made with the respect to the following facts and purposes: a. On July 1, 2015, the City and Consultant entered into that certain Agreement entitled "Agreement for Fire Department Plan Review Service," in the amount of Ninety Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($90,000) annually with the ability, upon mutual agreement to extend the contract for four (4) additional one (1) year terms for a total five year agreement amount of $450,000. b. On July 1, 2016 the City and Consultant entered into the first amendment to that certain agreement entitled "Agreement for Fire Department Plan Review Services" to extend the term to June 30, 2020. c. The parties now desire to increase the payment in the amount of $15,000.00 for a total contract amount of $465,000.00. 2. Section (4) entitled "PAYMENT" is hereby amended to read as follows: The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and terms and the schedule of payment as set forth in Exhibit B, Payment Rates and Schedule, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. Any terms in Exhibit B, other than the payment rates and schedule of payment, are null and void. The SECOND Amendment amount shall not exceed fifteen thousand dollars and no cents ($ 15,000.00) for additional plan check services for a total Agreement amount of four hundred and sixty five thousand dollars and no cents ($ 465,000.00). 3. Except for the changes specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 12/28/2017 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF TEMECULA PROACTIVE FIRE DESIGN & CONSULTING, INC. (Two Signatures of corporate officers required unless corporate documents authorize only one person to sign the agreement on behalf of the corporation.) By: By: Matt Rahn, Mayor ATTEST: Donald Walton, President By: By: e(414_L__ Randi Johl, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Marie Walton, Secretary Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney CONSULTANT Proactive Fire Design & Consulting, Inc. Donald Walton 43015 Blackdeer Loop, Ste. 205 951-296-3473 don@proactivefiredesign.com 2 PM Initial�:� Date: 12/28/2017 Item No. 7 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager 6e. CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Michael Heslin. Director of Information Technology and Support Services DATE: March 27, 2018 SUBJECT: Approve a Purchase and Installation Agreement with Canon Solutions America, Inc. for the Replacement of High Volume Copy Machines PREPARED BY: Damion Patrick, Assistant Director of ITSS RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve a Purchase and Installation Agreement with Canon Solutions America, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $51,968.37, for the replacement of high volume copiers within the Support Services Division of the Information Technology and Support Services Department (ITSS). BACKGROUND: The Support Services Division of ITSS is responsible for providing print, copy, and binding services for all City departments. This may include budget documents, council and commission agendas, flyers, programs, posters, or other high volume items. Three (3) high volume copy machines handle most of the print jobs within the division. These were installed in 2010 and have made over eight million copies combined. At this point, they are well beyond the typical end of life for a copy machine and are due for replacement. This project will replace these machines with new, state-of-the-art copy machines that meet or exceed the specifications of the three (3) existing machines. On November 14, 2017, the City issued a competitive solicitation for the purchase and installation of replacement equipment via the City's online bidding system, PlanetBids. The solicitation did include the Local Vendor Preference Ordinance language as adopted in July 2012, however, no local vendors proposed. After the selection committee reviewed all proposals, Canon Solutions of America, Inc., was the preferred vendor. The approval of this Agreement authorizes the purchase and installation of equipment to replace three (3) high volume copy machines within the Support Services Division of ITSS. FISCAL IMPACT: Outlay Budget. ATTACHMENT: Adequate funds have been budgeted in the 2017-2018 Capital Purchase and Install Agreement PURCHASE AND INSTALLATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND CANON SOLUTIONS AMERICA, INC. PURCHASE AND INSTALLATION OF CANON COPIERS THIS AGREEMENT is made and effective as of March 27, 2018, between the City of Temecula (hereinafter referred to as "City") a municipal corporation, and Canon Solutions America, Inc., a New York corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Contractor"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. TERM This Agreement shall commence on March 27, 2018, and shall remain and continue in effect for a period of one (1) year. The City may, upon mutual agreement of the parties, extend the contract for one (1) additional one (1) year term which extension shall be confirmed by the parties by written amendment to this Agreement, which will in no event terminate later than March 27, 2020. 2. PURCHASE AND SALE OF EQUIPMENT On and subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement, Contractor agrees to sell and install for the City the copiers, printers and related devices described in Exhibit A, Description of Equipment and/or Scope of Work attached hereto(hereafter "Equipment" or "Services"). 3. PURCHASE / INSTALLATION PRICE The Purchase Price which City agrees to pay to Contractor for the Equipment is set forth in Exhibit B, Purchase Price. 4. SCOPE OF WORK Contractor shall install the equipment as described in Exhibit A, Scope of Work ("Work"). Contractor shall provide and furnish all labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment and all utility and transportation services required for the Work as set forth in Exhibit A. All of said Work to be performed and materials to be furnished for the Work shall be in accordance with the specifications set forth in the Scope of Work. Contractor shall not commence the Work until such time as directed in writing by the City (e-mail being acceptable) which notification shall occur no later than March 30, 2018. 5. INTENTIONALLY OMITTED 6. INTENTIONALLY OMITTED 7. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF VENDOR Contractor makes the following representations and warranties to City: a. Authority and Consents. Contractor has the right, power, legal capacity and authority to enter into and perform its obligations under this Agreement. No approvals or consents of any persons are necessary in connection with Contractor's execution, delivery, installation and performance of this Agreement, except for such as have been obtained on or prior to the date hereof. The execution, delivery, installation and performance of this Agreement by Contractor have been duly authorized by all necessary action on the part of Contractor and constitute the legal, valid and binding obligations of Contractor, enforceable against Contractor in accordance with their respective terms. b. Intentionally Omitted. c. Full Disclosure. None of the representations and warranties made by Contractor in this Agreement contains or will contain any untrue statement of a material fact, or omits to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading. 8. PERFORMANCE Contractor shall at all times faithfully, competently and to the best of his or her ability, experience, and talent perform all tasks described herein. Contractor shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of Contractor hereunder in meeting its obligations under this Agreement. 9. CITY APPROVAL All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be furnished and work performed and completed subject to the approval of the City or its authorized representatives in accordance with the terms set forth in Exhibit A, Description of Equipment and/or Scope of Work. 10. TIME OF DELIVERY The date and time of delivery of the Equipment shall be on or before March 30, 2018. 11. PLACE OF DELIVERY The Equipment shall be delivered to this location: 41000 Main Street, Temecula, CA 92590. 12. INTENTIONALLY OMITTED 13. INTENTIONALLY OMITTED 14. INTENTIONALLY OMITTED 15. AGREEMENT DOCUMENTS a. This Agreement includes the following Exhibits, which are each by this reference incorporated herein and made a part hereof: 1. Exhibit A. Equipment Description and/or Scope of Work 2. Exhibit B. Purchase Price 3. Exhibit C California WSCA-NASPO Contract Participating Addendum #7- 15-70-23, as held by Canon Solutions America, Inc.'s parent company, Canon U.S.A., Inc., with Canon Solutions America, Inc. acting as authorized dealer for the supply of products and services. 4. Exhibit D. General Provisions, California Information Technology GSPD401 IT dated as of November 27, 2015 as referenced in California WSCA-NASPO Contract Participating Addendum #7-15-70-23. 5. Exhibit E. WSCA-NASPO Contract for the State of Nevada (Master Agreement #3091 for Copiers, Printers and Related Devices) as implemented in California through the Participating Addendum #7-15-70-23.b. b. In the event of any inconsistency between the terms of this Agreement and the agreements described in Exhibits C. through E., the following order of precedence shall apply: 1. This Agreement 2. Exhibit C California WSCA-NASPO Contract Participating Addendum #7- 15-70-23, as held by Canon Solutions America, Inc.'s parent company, Canon U.S.A., Inc.; with Canon Solutions America, Inc. acting as authorized dealer for the supply of products and services. 3. Exhibit D General Provisions, California Information Technology GSPD401IT dated as of November 27, 2013 as referenced in California WSCA-NASPO Contract Participating Addendum #7-15-70-23. 4. Exhibit E WSCA-NASPO Contract for the State of Nevada (Master Agreement #3091 for Copiers, Printers and Related Devices) as implemented in California through the Participating Addendum #7-15-70-23. c. The parties agree that the terms of this Agreement incorporate by reference the terms in the Contractor's WSCA-NASPO Contract for the State of Nevada (Master Agreement #3091 for Copiers, Printers and Related Devices) as implemented in California through the Participating Addendum #7-15-70-23. The California WSCA-NASPO Contract is held by Canon Solutions America, Inc.'s parent company, Canon U.S.A., Inc., with Canon Solutions America, Inc. acting as authorized dealer for the supply of products and services. 16. INTENTIONALLY OMITTED 17. INTENTIONALLY OMITTED 18. INTENTIONALLY OMITTED 19. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES The Contractor shall keep itself informed of all local, State and Federal ordinances, laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Contractor shall at all times observe and comply with all such ordinances, laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity arising from the failure of the Contractor to comply with this section. 20. PROHIBITED INTEREST No officer, or employee of the City of Temecula shall have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, the proceeds thereof, the Contractor, or Contractor's sub -contractors for this project, during his/her tenure or for one year thereafter. The Contractor hereby warrants and represents to the City that no officer or employee of the City of Temecula has any interest, whether contractual, non -contractual, financial or otherwise, in this transaction, or in the business of the Contractor or Contractor's sub -contractors on this project. Contractor further agrees to notify the City in the event any such interest is discovered whether or not such interest is prohibited by law or this Agreement. 21. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR a. Contractor is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Contractor shall at all times be under Contractor's exclusive direction and control. Neither City nor any of its officers, employees, agents, or volunteers shall have control over the conduct of Contractor or any of Contractor's officers, employees, or agents except as set forth in this Agreement. Contractor shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. Contractor shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any manner. b. No employee benefits shall be available to Contractor in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Contractor as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Contractor for performing services hereunder for City. 22. ASSIGNMENT Except as otherwise set forth in this Agreement the Contractor shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of the City. 23. NOTICES Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (i) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice. Notice shall be effective upon delivery to the addresses specified below or on the third business day following deposit with the document delivery service or United States Mail as provided above. Mailing Address: To Consultant: 24. GOVERNING LAW City of Temecula Attn: City Manager 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 Attention: City Manager Canon Solutions America, Inc. Attn: Timothy Cooper 3237 E. Guasti Road #200 Ontario, CA 91761 With a copy to: Canon Solutions America, Inc. One Canon Park Melville, New York 11746 Attn: Vice President, Legal The City and Contractor understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event such litigation is filed by one party against the other to enforce its rights under this Agreement, the prevailing party, as determined by the Court's judgment, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and litigation expenses for the relief granted. 25. ENTIRE AGREEMENT This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or contemporaneous agreements. understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material. 26. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Contractor warrants and represents that he or she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Contractor and has the authority to bind Contractor to the performance of its obligations hereunder. The City Manager is authorized to enter into an IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF TEMECULA Matt Rahn, Mayor ATTEST: CANON SOLUTIONS AMERICA, INC. (Two Signatures of corporate ofl'Icers required unless corporate documents authorize only one person to sign the agreement on behalf of the corporation.) By: Name: 1IQuun Rale Tine: S eivo rS ecat-cyc i n By: Randi Johl, JD, MMC, City Clerk Name: Title: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter M. Thorson, City Attomey CONTRACTOR Carton Solutions America, Inc. Timothy Cooper 3237 E. Guasti Road #200 Ontario, CA 91761 (Insert Phone Number] 004 090 — I y$ y (Insert Fax Number] t 0 )340— l 0 [Insert E -Mail] 'f Cooper(` CSO. CAnor1.COYV PM IniUa : ' 1 Date: -�nr�Z1-t EXHIBIT A DESCRIPTION OF EQUIPMENT AND/OR SCOPE OF WORK City is purchasing the following copiers and installation services from Contractor: 1. Color copier, model number Canon iRC 7565i; 2. Black and white copier, model number Canon iR 8505i; and 3. Black and white copier, model number Canon 6565i. EXHIBIT B PURCHASE PRICE Current Copier Model Requested Model (Qty) Options Purchase Price Sales Tax .,(8.75%) Removal Cost of Current Equipment Cost of Data Erase of Current Equipment Total Cost Canon iRC 7065 Canon MC 7565i (1) Saddle Stitich Finisher, Hole Punch Unit, Document Insertion/ Folding Unit $13,804.00 $1,207.85 $0.00 $225.00 $15,236.85 Canon IR 7105 Canon iR 8505i (1) Saddle Stitch Finisher, Hole Punch Unit, Document Insertion/ Folding Unit, Paper deck $26,863.00 $2,350.51 -$700.00 $225.00 $28,738.51 Canon 105+ Canon 6565i (1) Staple Finisher, Hole Punch $7,143.00 5625.01 $0.00 $225.00 $7,993.01 Total: $51,968.37 EXHIBIT C CALIFORNIA WSCA-NASPO CONTRACT PARTICIPATING ADDENDUM #7-15-70-23, AS HELD BY CANON SOLUTIONS AMERICA, INC.'S PARENT COMPANY, CANON U.S.A., INC., WITH CANON SOLUTIONS AMERICA, INC. ACTING AS AUTHORIZED DEALER FOR THE SUPPLY OF PRODUCTS AND SERVICES. [attach copy of agreement here] Exhibit C to Purchase and Installation Agreement Between The City of Temecula and Canon Solutions America, Inc. STATE OF CALIFORNIA PARTICIPATING ADDENDUM NO. 7-15-70-23 Copiers, Printers and Related Devices Nevada NASPO ValuePoint Master Agreement 3091 Canon U.S.A., Inc. This Participating Addendum Number 7-15-70-23 is entered into between the State of California, Department of General Services (hereafter referred to as "State" or "DGS") and Canon USA (hereafter referred to as "Contractor") under the lead State of Nevada NASPO ValuePoint Cooperative Purchasing Organization (NASPO ValuePoint) Master Agreement No. 3091. 1. Scope A. This Participating Addendum covers the purchase of Copiers, Printers and Related Devices under the Nevada NASPO ValuePoint Master Agreement Number 3091. The NASPO ValuePoint Master Agreement is hereby incorporated by reference and shall apply to the purchase of goods and services made under this Participating Addendum. B. This Participating Addendum is available for use by all State Departments and California political subdivisions/local governments. A political subdivision/local government is defined as any city, county, city and county, district, or other local governmental body or corporation, including the California State Universities (CSU) and University of Califomia (UC) systems, K-12 schools and community colleges empowered to expend public funds. C. Each political subdivision/local government is to make its own determination whether this Participating Addendum and the NASPO ValuePoint Master Agreement are consistent with its procurement policies and regulations. 2. Term A. The term of this Participating Addendum shall begin upon signature approval by the State and will end December 31, 2019, or upon termination by the State, whichever occurs first. B. Lead State amendments to extend the Master Agreement term date are not automatically incorporated into this Participating Addendum. Extension(s) to the term of this Participating Addendum will be through a written amendment upon mutual agreement between the State and the Contractor. 3. Mandatory. Statewide Contracts Product and service categories that are available on mandatory Califomia statewide contracts for information technology (IT) copiers, printers and related devices cannot be purchased from this Participating Addendum by State Departments without an exemption. State Departments are responsible for obtaining an exemption from DGS prior to issuing a purchase order. This restriction is not applicable to political subdivisions/local govemments. Page 1 of 9 Participating Addendum No. 7-15-70-23 4. Terms and Conditions Terms and conditions listed below are hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this Participating Addendum as if attached herein and shall apply to the purchase of goods or services made under this Participating Addendum. These include: A. General Provisions — Information Technology, GSPD401 IT, effective 11/27/2013 ("General Conditions"), subject to the modifications set forth in Section 4.B below. The twelve page document can be viewed at: htto://www.documents.dqs.ca.qov/pdhoolioroc/ospd4011T13 1127.0df 1) Terms in the General Conditions stated as being applicable to "Contractor" shall be deemed to be references to each applicable Authorized Dealer under a purchase order to the extent consistent with their responsibilities and activities as contemplated by this Participating Addendum, and reference to "this Contract" shall be deemed to be references to each purchase order. 2) For the purpose of this Participating Addendum, the parties agree to the following modications to the General Provisons: i.With respect to Section 9, "Assignment," consent shall not be required for assignments of rights to payment, provided that Contractor and the applicable Authorized Dealer remain responsible for their obligations this Participating Addendum and the applicable purchase order. ii.With respect to Section 13, "Transporatation Costs and Other Fees or Expenses," if special rigging is required for delivery and installation, the Authorized Dealer may require additional charges therefor but only if approved by the Ordering Agency. iii.With respect to Section 14, "Delivery," Contractor shall make commercially reasonable efforts to meet the specific delivery dates designated in any purchase orders. iv.With respect to Section 18, "Warranty,' the only product warranty terms are those as provided by the respective manufacturer. In the case of Canon or Oce brand manufactured equipment, Canon USA's standard limited warranty statements packaged with the products govern; and provided further that to the extent Contractor offers Software, the warranty coverage for such Software shall be governed by the warranty terms provided by the Software developer of such Software in the applicable end user license agreements included with the Software. v.With respect to Section 22, "Termination for Convenience of the State," such termination is subject to Section 17 of this Participating Addendum. vi.With respect to Section 23.b., "Termination for Default," the parties agree that the cure period in case of breach shall be thirty (30) days. vii.With respect to Section 26, "Limitation of Liability," the exceptions set forth in subsection 26.d.(ii) shall not apply. viii.For the avoidance of doubt, the parties acknowledge and agree that no result of Contractor's services under the Participating Addendum shall be deemed "work for hire" resulting in Work Product. Page 2 of 9 Participating Addendum No. 7-15-70-23 ix.The terms and conditions governing the Software under this Participating Addendum are contained in the applicable developer's Software end user license agreements, and in any applicable Software maintenance and support agreements included with the purchase of the Software license or separately purchased by Ordering Agencies. x.With respect to Section 46, "Examination and Audit," the State's audits rights shall apply only to those records reasonably necessary to support Contractor's or Authorized Dealers' invoices and charges to the State and Ordering Agencies for products and services purchased or leased under this Participating Addendum. 5. Order of Precedence In the event of any inconsistency between the articles, attachments, or provisions which constitute this agreement, the following descending order of precedence shall apply: A. California Participating Addendum Number 7-15-70-23 B. Nevada NASPO ValuePoint Master Agreement Number 3091, subject to the changes set forth below: With respect to 3.7.4 of the Master Agreement, Contractor can provide the State with specific options to enhance data security in addition to the 3 -pass overwrite that will be performed by Contractor at no additional charge as required under 3.7.4.3. Some of these options are at an additional cost, including hard drive removal under Section 5.4.6 of the Master Agreement. The Ordering Agency is responsible for choosing what, if any, options it wants Contractor to provide beyond the included end -of -term 3 -pass overwrite, including whatever erasure standards may be required by applicable law. ii. The notification requirements of Section 5.4.7.2 of the Master Agreement, "Special Promotions," shall apply exclusively to Contractor in the event Contractor provides special promotion or pricing as a supplement to the applicable Attachment I Price Schedule. C. Canon Service Level Agreement (Exhibit B) 6. Available Products and Services This Participating Addendum includes the following Groups: Group A — Convenience Copiers Group B — Production Copiers Group C — Wide Format Group D — Printers 7. Disallowed Products and Services Contractor -supplied leasing agreements and rental options are not allowed. This restriction is not applicable to political subdivisions/local govemments. Page 3 of 9 Participating Addendum No. 7-15-70-23 8. Price List A. Contractor shall submit a Product and Service Schedule (PSS) identifying all products and services offered under this Participating Addendum for the State's approval. B. The PSS shall include the following: 1) Manufacturer Part Number or Item Number 2) List Price 3) Minimum Discount off List Price 4) Contract Price C. Contractor shall maintain a website dedicated to this Participating Addendum which contains the State -approved PSS. D. Contractor shall submit a written notice of price increases/decreases and a revised PSS for the State's approval prior to updating the Contractor's dedicated website for this Participating Addendum. E. State -approved PSS will be posted on the State's eProcurement website. 9. Equipment Additions/Deletions A. Contractor may add or delete equipment introduced or removed from the market by the manufacturer under the following conditions: 1) Equipment is within existing awarded groups under the NASPO ValuePoint Master Agreement; 2) Contractor has obtained prior approval from the Nevada NASPO ValuePoint Contract Administrator; and 3) Contractor receives written approval from the California State Contract Administrator. B. Contractor shall submit a written notice of equipment additions/deletions and a revised PSS for the State's approval prior to updating the Contractor's dedicated website for this Participating Addendum. C. Contractor shall not add neW categories or groups of equipment or services under this Participating Addendum that were not originally included in the NASPO ValuePoint Master Agreement. D. Notwithstanding the provisions of this Section 9, Contractor retain discretion to remove discontinued equipment models from the list of equipment offered under this Participating Addendum in accordance with the NASPO ValuePoint Master Agreement. Page 4of9 Participating Addendum No. 7-15-70-23 10. Authorized Dealers A. State -approved Canon USA authorized dealers ("Authorized Dealers") will be posted on the State's eProcurement website. Authorized Dealers may accept orders for the sale of equipment and the performance of services under this Agreement and, with respect to such orders, shall have sole responsibility for fulfilling such orders. Charges for all orders will be invoiced individually by each Authorized Dealer and order payments will be made by the Ordering Agency directly to the Authorized Dealers. In the event of any disputes between an Authorized Dealer and the State or Ordering Agency, Canon USA shall investigate, shall consult with the Ordering Agency or State as appropriate, and shall use commercially reasonable efforts to resolve the dispute. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall relieve Contractor of its responsibilities and obligations hereunder. Contractor agrees to be fully responsible to the State for the acts and omissions of its Authorized Dealers and of persons either directly or indirectly employed by the Contractor. Contractor's obligation to pay its authorized dealers is an independent obligation from the State's obligation to make payments to the Contractor. B. As the prime contractor, contractor is responsible for reports and fees required by the terms and conditions of the NASPO ValuePoint Master Agreement and State Participating Addendum. C. Subject to the approval of the State, Authorized Dealers may be added on a quarterly basis during the term of the contract. Contractors shall notify the State of any deleted Authorized Dealers or changes to current Authorized Dealers contact information at any time during the contract term. D. Contractor shall submit an Authorized Dealer list identifying the company name, address, contact name, phone number and email of Authorized Dealers to the State's Contract Administrator for the State's approval prior to updating its California specific contract website. 11. Ordering Agency Responsibilities A. State department and political subdivision/local govemment use of this Participating Addendum is optional. B. A User Instructions guide will be prepared and administered by the State Contract Administrator. C. Ordering agencies must follow the Contractor Selection and Request for Offer (RFO) process outlined within the User Instructions guide prior to executing orders against this Participating Addendum. This section does not apply to political subdivision/local government use of this Participating Addendum. Page 5 of 9 Participating Addendum No. 7-15-70-23 12. Contractor Responsibilities Contractor or the Authorized Dealer must respond to the ordering agency's RFO to be eligible to receive a Purchase Order under this Participating Addendum. 13. Invoicing The State Participating Addendum Number and Ordering Agency Purchase Order Number shall appear on each purchase order and invoice for all purchases placed under this Participating Addendum. 14. Usage Reporting A. Contractor shall submit usage reports on a quarterly basis to the State Contract Administrator for all California entity purchases using the report template attached hereto as Attachment A. B. The report is due even when there is no activity. C. The report shall be an Excel spreadsheet transmitted electronically to the DGS mailbox at PDWSCA@dgs.ca.gov. D. Any report that does not follow the required format or that excludes information will be deemed incomplete. Contractor will be responsible for submitting corrected reports within five business days of the date of written notification from the State. E. Tax must not be included in the report, even if it is on the purchase order. E. Reports are due each quarter as follows: Reporting Period Dile Date,t;, JAN 1 to MARCH 30 APR 30 APR 1 to JUNE 30 JUL 31 JULY 1 to SEPT 30 OCT 31 OCT 1 to DEC 30 JAN 31 G. Failure to meet reporting requirements and submit the reports on a timely basis shall constitute grounds for suspension of this contract. H. Amendments for term extensions may be approved only if all due reports have been submitted to the State. 15. Administrative Fee A. Contractor shall submit a check, payable to the State of California, remitted to the Department of General Services, Procurement Division for the calculated amount equal to one percent (0.01) of the sales for the quarterly period. Page 6 of 9 Participating Addendum No. 7-15-70-23 B. Contractor must include the Participating Addendum Number on the check. Those checks submitted to the State without the Participating Addendum Number will be returned to Contractor for additional identifying information. C. Administrative fee checks shall be submitted to: State of California Department of General Services, Procurement Division Attention: Master Unit 2 707 3`d Street, 2nd Floor, MS 2-202 West Sacramento, CA 95605 D. The administrative fee shall not be included as a separately charged adjustment to Contractor's NASPO ValuePoint Master Agreement pricing. E. The administrative fee shall not be invoiced or charged as a separate line item to the ordering agency. F. Payment of the administrative fee is due irrespective of payment status on orders or service contracts from a purchasing entity. G. Administrative fee checks are due for each quarter as follows: ;Reporting Period r, 7Diii: Oate;;0 JAN 1 to MARCH 30 APR 30 APR 1 to JUNE 30 JUL 31 JULY 1 to SEPT 30 OCT 31 OCT 1 to DEC 30 JAN 31 H. Failure to meet administrative fee requirements and submit fees on a timely basis shall constitute grounds for suspension of this contract. 16. Contract Management A. The primary Contractor Contract Manager for this Participating Addendum shall be as follows: Contractor: Canon USA Name: Mike Hurley, Contract Admin. Phone: (631) 330-3613 Fax: (631) 330-5459 E -Mail: isabidadminCa�cusa.canon.com Address: 1 Canon Park Melville, NY 11747 B. Should Contractor Contract Manager information change, the Contractor will provide written notice with the updated information to the State Contract Administrator no later than ten business days after the change. Page 7 of 9 Participating Addendum No. 7-15-70-23 C. The State Contract Administrator for this Participating Addendum shall be as follows: Name: Cynthia Okoroike Phone: (916) 375-4389 Fax: (916) 375-4663 E -Mail: cyntha.okoroike(dgs.ca.gov Address: State of California Department of General Services Procurement Division 707 Third Street, 2nd Floor, MS 2-202 West Sacramento, CA 95605 D. Should State Contract Administrator information change, the State will provide written notice with the updated information to the Contractor Contract Manager no later than ten business days after the change. 17. Termination of Agreement The State may terminate this Participating Addendum at any time upon 30 days prior written notice to the Contractor. Upon termination or other expiration of this Participating Addendum, each party will assist the other party in orderly termination of the Participating Addendum and the transfer of all assets, tangible and intangible, as may facilitate the orderly, nondisrupted business continuation of each party. This provision shall not relieve the Contractor, Authorized Dealers and the Ordering Agency, as applicable, of the obligation to perform under any purchase order or other similar ordering document for the stated terms thereof if executed prior to the termination becoming effective. 18. Amendment No amendment or variation of the terms of this Participating Addendum shall be valid unless made in writing, signed by the parties and approved as required. No oral understanding or agreement not incorporated in the Participating Addendum is binding on any of the parties. Page 8 of 9 Participating Addendum No. 7-15-70-23 19. Agreement A. This Participating Addendum and the Master Agreement together with its exhibits and/or amendments, set forth the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter of all previous communications, representations or agreements, whether oral or written, with respect to the subject matter hereof. Terms and conditions inconsistent with or contrary to the terms and conditions of this Participating Addendum and the Master Agreement, together with its exhibits and/or amendments, shall not be added to or incorporated into this Participating Addendum or the Master Agreement and its exhibits and/or amendments, by any subsequent purchase order or otherwise, and any such attempts to incorporate such terms and conditions are hereby rejected. The terms and conditions of this Participating Addendum and the Master Agreement and its exhibits and/or amendments shall prevail and govern in the case of any such inconsistent or additional terms. B. By signing below Contractor agrees to offer the same products/and or services as on the Nevada NASPO ValuePoint Master Agreement Number 3091, at prices equal to or lower than the prices on that contract. C. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Participating Addendum as of the date of execution by both parties below. STATE OF CALIFORNIA Canon U.S.A., Inc. By: By: p Name: Jim Butler Name: Title: Deputy Director Title:-uC4tVi-€ mE4 f Ca-M•1Qr Date: -t y, t p ` �t �) tS Date: ple u e- Z3, 2O 5 Page 9 of 9 EXHIBIT B SERVICE LEVEL AGREEMENT (SLA) 1. Customer Level SLA 1.1 Purpose The purpose of this addendum is to define service levels; as well as provide the Customer with a defined replacement process for equipment performing below expectations. 1.2 Response Time - Fleet Vendor agrees to maintain the following service levels defined below as targets: Group Performance Criteria Quarterly Uptime A/B Average Uptime under 105ppm multifunctional devices ( within servicing territory for each dealer) Includes 95% or better over the 4 fixed quarterly intervals per year, for devices within Servicing Territory. (Excludes devices with rated speeds of 105ppm or greater) A/B Average Uptime Production Equipment 105ppm or greater (within servicing • territory for each dealer) 80% or better on all production equipment over the 4 fixed quarterly intervals per year on production level equipment within Canon's Servicing Territory. C Wide Format Devices PW900 CW650 PW340 CW900 PW500 95% or better over the 4 fixed quarterly intervals per year, for devices within Servicing Territory. D Printers (Color and Black &White) imageCLASS Models MF models imageRUNNER LBP models have the same uptime as category A/B under 105ppm See Exchange /Carry -In Policy Attached F Scanners See Exchange /Carry -In Policy Attached 6 Hours or Less - over 6 fixed quarterly intervals Average On -Site Response Time per year, for devices within a servicing territory. Except exchange models if applicable. First Time Fix 80% of all service calls or better These service levels will be measured on a quarterly basis between Vendor and the State. Servicing Territory — 50 miles within the Authorized Servicer Production Equipment - units with rated speeds 105 pages per min or faster and/or graphic production color units (excludes imageRUNNER color units). Multifunctional Devices — Black and White units with rated speeds below 105 pages per minute and business color units (imageRUNNER color units are included in this classification). For All Multi -Function devices - B/W & Color Average response time - Response time, as noted above, shall be calculated from the time the customer call is placed with our Dispatch department, until the time the Technician arrives at the individual location. Response times are calculated between 8:30am and 5:OOpm, Monday through Friday, excluding Canon holidays. For the individual location which has multiple machines and active service calls, the Technician's arrival shall stop the response time calculation for all open service calls at that location. For B/W units with rated speeds 105 pages per minute or faster and/or Graphic production color units (Excludes imageRUNNER color units) Downtime is calculated from the time a service call is placed with our Dispatch department until the time the Technician completes the repair. Uptime criteria are calculated between 8:30am and 5:OOpm, Monday through Friday, excluding Canon holidays, and exceptions outlined in the following sentence(s). Uptime requirements will not include preventative maintenance service calls, calls which could have been prevented by key operator functions outlined in unit's operation manual, calls created by user mishandling, units which are running outside the manufacturer's optimum performance volume, or units which need to be over -hauled as a result of reaching useful life, in the opinion of our Service department. For Groups A and B - Downtime is calculated from the time a service call is placed with our Dispatch department until the time the Technician completes the repair. Uptime criteria is calculated between 8:30am and 5:OOpm, Monday through Friday, excluding Canon holidays, and exceptions outlined below. Uptime requirements will not include preventative maintenance service calls, calls which could have been prevented by key operator functions outlined in unit's operation manual, calls created by user mishandling, units which are running outside the manufacturer's optimum performance volume, or units which need to be over -hauled as a result of reaching useful life, in the opinion of our Service department. Loaner Unit/Backup Production — If any unit in Groups A and B is inoperable for a period in excess of 72 hours, Vendor shall provide the Customer with either: i) A loaner unit of similar speed and capabilities until such time as the unit(s) covered by this agreement are operable, or ii) Provide the Customer with off-site manned production capabilities to accomplish the work of the unit that is inoperable at the sole cost of the Vendor. Such costs shall be limited to cost of production (service and supplies), equipment, labor, power, transportation of jobs to and from the off-site production facility and facilities. Prior to installing a substitute product, supplier will be allowed 90 days to remedy any quality or reliability issues. A designated factory authorized technician must certify each.unit's ability to produce acceptable impressions with acceptable copies between calls or uptime. The guarantee will remain in effect for the term of the contract or up to five (5) years from the date of purchase/lease, provided the equipment has not been subjected to abuse or neglect and has been continuously covered by a Maintenance Contract. This replacement policy will remain in effect for the term of the contract and is subject to the Customer remaining current with supplier's payment requirements. For groups D and F, The Exchange and Carry -Inn Product Limited Warranty would apply. 1.3 Additional Vendor Guarantees 1.3.1 Training — End-user training - Upon equipment installation shall be at no charge. Technical support training to include Network connectivity and print driver installation. Subsequent training shall be available on an ongoing basis during the contract at an additional charge. Scheduling of all training shall be mutually agreed upon during regular business hours. 1.3.2 Invoicing — Vendor shall maintain timely, accurate invoicing, less service run impressions, as defined below. Measurable Service Level Timely Invoicing Invoices will be submitted no later than the 251h of the month immediately following the close of a billing period. Accurate Invoicing Invoices do not require any credits for miss -billing Service Impressions' Vendor will credit all service run impressions within the same billing cycle 2. Reporting and Billing 2.1 Timely Reporting — Vendor shall produce reporting for the State within 30 days of the closing of the reporting period. 2.2 Timely Payment of Administrative Fees — Vendor shall produce payment for any State Specific Administrative Fee within 30 days of the closing of the reporting period. 2.3 Accuracy of Reporting — The State may request at any point proof of the reporting accuracy through the data set supporting the reporting. If the State has reason to believe that multiple and systemic reporting errors exist, that cannot be corrected to the State's satisfaction; the State may require an audit by a third party. If errors are found, the Successful vendor must reimburse the State for the cost of the auditor as well as correcting any administrative fee errors. 2.4 Accuracy of Billing — The State may request at any point proof of the billing accuracy through the data set supporting the billing. If the State has reason to believe that multiple and systemic billing errors exist, that cannot be corrected to the State's satisfaction; the State may require an audit by a third party. EXHIBIT D GENERAL PROVISIONS, CALIFORNIA INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY GSPD401IT DATED AS OF NOVEMBER 27, 2013 AS REFERENCED IN CALIFORNIA WSCA-NASPO CONTRACT PARTICIPATING ADDENDUM #7-15-70-23. [attach copy of agreement here] GSPD-401 IT (REVISED AND EFFECTIVE 11/27/2013) GENERAL PROVISIONS- INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 1. DEFINITIONS: Unless otherwise specified in the Statement of Work, the following terms shall be given the meaning shown, unless context requires otherwise. a) "Acceptance Tests" means those tests performed during the Performance Period which are intended to determine compliance of Equipment and Software with the specifications and all other Attachments incorporated herein by reference and to determine the reliability of the Equipment b) "Application Program" means a computer program which is intended to be executed for the purpose of performing useful work for the user of the information being processed. Application programs are developed or otherwise acquired by the user of the Hardware/Software system, but they may be supplied by the Contractor c) "Attachment' means a mechanical, electrical, or electronic interconnection to the Contractor -supplied Machine or System of Equipment, manufactured by other than the original Equipment manufacturer that is not connected by the Contractor. d) "Business entity" means any individual, business, partnership, joint venture, corporation, S -corporation, limited liability company, sole proprietorship, joint stock company, consortium, or other private legal entity recognized by statute. e) "Buyer" means the State's authorized contracting official. f) "Commercial Hardware" means Hardware developed or regularly used that: (i) has been sold, leased, or licensed to the general public; (ii) has been offered for sale, lease, or license to the general public; (iii) has not been offered, sold, leased, or licensed to the public but will be available for commercial sale, lease, or license in time to satisfy the delivery requirements of this Contract; or (iv) satisfies a criterion expressed in (i), (ii), or (iii) above and would require only minor modifications to meet the requirements of this Contract. g) "Commercial Software" means Software developed or regularly used that: (i) has been sold, leased, or licensed to the general public; (ii) has been offered for sale, lease, or license to the general public; (iii) has not been offered, sold, leased, or licensed to the public but will be available for commercial sale, lease, or license in time to satisfy the delivery requirements of this Contract; or (iv) satisfies a criterion expressed in (i), (ii), or (iii) above and would require only minor modifications to meet the requirements of this Contract. h) "Contract" means this Contract or agreement (including any purchase order), by whatever name known or in whatever format used i) "Custom Software" means Software that does not meet the definition of Commercial Software. j) "Contractor" means the Business Entity with whom the State enters into this Contract. Contractor shall be synonymous with "supplier", "vendor or other similar term. k) "Data Processing Subsystem" means a complement of Contractor -furnished individual Machines, including the necessary controlling elements (or the functional equivalent), Operating Software and Software, if any, which are acquired to operate as an integrated group, and which are interconnected entirely by Contractor -supplied power and/or signal cables; e.g., direct access controller and drives, a cluster of terminals with their controller, etc I) "Data Processing System (System)" means the total complement of Contractor -furnished Machines, including one or more central processors (or instruction processors), Operating Software which are acquired to operate as an integrated group. m) "Deliverables" means Goods, Software, Information Technology, telecommunications technology, Hardware, and other items (e.g. reports) to be delivered pursuant to this Contract, including any such items furnished incident to the provision of services. n) "Designated CPU(s)" means for each product, if applicable, the central processing unit of the computers or the server unit, including any associated peripheral units. If no specific "Designated CPU(s)" are specified on the Contract, the tens shall mean any and all CPUs located at the site specified therein o) "Documentation" means manuals and other printed materials necessary or useful to the State in its use or maintenance of the Equipment or Software provided hereunder. Manuals and other printed materials customized for the State hereunder constitute Work Product if such materials are required by the Statement of Work p) "Equipment "is an all-inclusive term which refers either to individual Machines or to a complete Data Processing System or Subsystem, including its Hardware and Operating Software (if any) q) "Equipment Failure" is a malfunction in the Equipment, excluding all external factors, which prevents the accomplishment of the Equipment's intended function(s) If microcode or Operating Software residing in the Equipment is necessary for the proper operation of the Equipment, a failure of such microcode or Operating Software which prevents the accomplishment of the Equipment's intended functions shall be deemed to be an Equipment Failure r) "Facility Readiness Date" means the date specified in the Statement of Work by which the State must have the site prepared and available for Equipment delivery and installation. s) "Goods" means all types of tangible personal property, including but not limited to materials, supplies, and Equipment (including computer and telecommunications Equipment) t) "Hardware" usually refers to computer Equipment and is contrasted with Software. See also Equipment. u) "Installation Date" means the date specified in the Statement of Work by which the Contractor must have the ordered Equipment ready (certified) for use by the State. v) "Information Technology" includes, but is not limited to, all electronic technology systems and services, automated information handling, System design and analysis, conversion of data, computer programming, information storage and retrieval, telecommunications which include voice, video, and data communications, requisite System controls, simulation. electronic commerce, and all related interactions between people and Machines w) "Machine" means an individual unit of a Data Processing System or Subsystem, separately identified by a type and/or model number, comprised of but not limited to mechanical, electro -mechanical, and electronic parts, microcode, and special features installed thereon and including any necessary Software, e.g., central processing unit, memory module, tape unit, card reader, etc. x) "Machine Alteration" means any change to a Contractor - supplied Machine which is not made by the Contractor, and which results in the Machine deviating from its physical, mechanical, electrical, or electronic (including microcode) design, whether or not additional devices or parts are employed in making such change y) "Maintenance Diagnostic Routines" means the diagnostic programs customarily used by the Contractor to test Equipment for proper functioning and reliability. z) "Manufacturing Materials" means parts, tools, dies, jigs, fixtures, plans, drawings, and information produced or acquired, or rights acquired, specifically to fulfill obligations set forth herein. aa) "Mean Time Between Failure (MTBF)" means the average expected or observed time between consecutive failures in a System or component. bb) "Mean Time to Repair (MTTR)" means the average expected or observed time required to repair a System or component and return it to normal operation Page 1 of 12 GSPD-4011T (REVISED AND EFFECTIVE 11/27/2013) GENERAL PROVISIONS- INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY cc) "Operating Software" means those routines, whether or not identified as Program Products, that reside in the Equipment and are required for the Equipment to perform its intended function(s), and which interface the operator, other Contractor -supplied programs, and user programs to the Equipment dd) "Operational Use Time" means for performance measurement purposes, that time during which Equipment is in actual operation by the State. For maintenance Operational Use Time purposes, that time during which Equipment is in actual operation and is not synonymous with power on time ee) "Period of Maintenance Coverage" means the period of time, as selected by the State, during which maintenance services are provided by the Contractor for a fixed monthly charge, as opposed to an hourly charge for services rendered. The Period of Maintenance Coverage consists of the Principal Period of Maintenance and any additional hours of coverage per day, and/or increased coverage for weekends and holidays. ff) "Preventive Maintenance" means that maintenance, performed on a scheduled basis by the Contractor, which is designed to keep the Equipment in proper operating condition. gg) "Principal Period of Maintenance" means any nine consecutive hours per day (usually between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m.) as selected by the State, including an official meal period not to exceed one hour, Monday through Friday, excluding holidays observed at the installation. hh) "Programming Aids" means Contractor -supplied programs and routines executable on the Contractor's Equipment which assists a programmer in the development of applications including language processors, sorts, communications modules, data base management systems, and utility routines, (tape -to -disk routines, disk -to -print routines, etc.). ii) "Program Product" means programs, routines, subroutines, and related items which are proprietary to the Contractor and which are licensed to the State for its use, usually on the basis of separately stated charges and appropriate contractual provisions. "Remedial Maintenance" means that maintenance performed by the Contractor which results from Equipment (including Operating Software) failure, and which is performed as required, i.e., on an unscheduled basis. kk) "Software" means an all-inclusive tern which refers to any computer programs, routines, or subroutines supplied by the Contractor, including Operating Software, Programming Aids, Application Programs, and Program Products. II) "Software Failure"means a malfunction in the Contractor - supplied Software, other than Operating Software, which prevents the accomplishment of work, even though the Equipment (including its Operating Software) may still be capable of operating properly. For Operating Software failure, see definition of Equipment Failure mm) "State" means the government of the State of California, its employees and authorized representatives, including without limitation any department, agency, or other unit of the government of the State of California. nn) "System" means the complete collection of Hardware, Software and services as described in this Contract, integrated and functioning together, and performing in accordance with this Contract. oo) "U.S. Intellectual Property Rights" means intellectual property rights enforceable in the United States of America, including without limitation rights in trade secrets, copyrights, and U.S. patents. ll) 2. CONTRACT FORMATION: a) If this Contract results from a sealed bid offered in response to a solicitation conducted pursuant to Chapters 2 (commencing with Section 10290), 3 (commencing with Section 12100), and 3.6 (commencing with Section 12125) of Part 2 of Division 2 of the Public Contract Code (PCC), then Contractor's bid is a firm offer to the State which is accepted by the issuance of this Contract and no further action is required by either party. b) If this Contract results from a solicitation other than described in paragraph a), above, the Contractor's quotation or proposal is deemed a firm offer and this Contract document is the State's acceptance of that offer c) If this Contract resulted from a joint bid, it shall be deemed one indivisible Contract. Each such joint Contractor will be jointly and severally liable for the performance of the entire Contract The State assumes no responsibility or obligation for the division of orders or purchases among joint Contractors 3. COMPLETE INTEGRATION: This Contract, including any documents incorporated herein by express reference, is intended to be a complete integration and there are no prior or contemporaneous different or additional agreements pertaining to the subject matter of the Contract. 4. SEVERABILITY: The Contractor and the State agree that if any provision of this Contract is found to be illegal or unenforceable, such term or provision shall be deemed stricken and the remainder of the Contract shall remain in full force and effect. Either party having knowledge of such term or provision shall promptly inform the other of the presumed non -applicability of such provision 5. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR: Contractor and the agents and employees of the Contractor, in the performance of this Contract, shall act in an independent capacity and not as officers or employees or agents of the State. 6. APPLICABLE LAW: This Contract shall be governed by and shall be interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of California; venue of any action brought with regard to this Contract shall be in Sacramento County, Sacramento, Califomia The United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods shall not apply to this Contract. 7. COMPLIANCE WITH STATUTES AND REGULATIONS: a) The State and the Contractor warrants and certifies that in the performance of this Contract, it will comply with all applicable statutes, rules, regulations and orders of the United States and the State of California. The Contractor agrees to indemnify the State against any loss, cost. damage or liability by reason of the Contractor's violation of this provision b) The State will notify the Contractor of any such claim in writing and tender the defense thereof within a reasonable time; and c) The Contractor will have sole control of the defense of any action on such claim and all negotiations for its settlement or compromise; provided that (i) when substantial principles of government or public law are involved, when litigation might create precedent affecting future State operations or liability, or when involvement of the State is otherwise mandated by law, the State may participate in such action at its own expense with respect to attorneys' fees and costs (but not liability); (ii) where a settlement would impose liability on the State, affect principles of California government or public law, or impact the authority of the State, the Department of General Services will have the right to approve or disapprove any settlement or compromise, which approval will not unreasonably be withheld or delayed; and (iii) the State will reasonably cooperate in the defense and in any related settlement negotiations d) If this Contract is in excess of $554,000, it is subject to the requirements of the World Trade Organization (WTO) Government Procurement Agreement (GPA). e) To the extent that this Contract falls within the scope of Government Code Section 11135, the Contractor hereby agrees to respond to and resolve any complaint brought to Page 2 of 12 GSPD-401 IT (REVISED AND EFFECTIVE 11/27/2013) GENERAL PROVISIONS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY its attention, regarding accessibility of its products or services. 8. CONTRACTOR'S POWER AND AUTHORITY: The Contractor warrants that it has full power and authority to grant the rights herein granted and will hold the State harmless from and against any loss, cost, liability, and expense (including reasonable attorney fees) arising out of any breach of this warranty. Further, the Contractor avers that it will not enter into any arrangement with any third party which might abridge any rights of the State under this Contract a) The State will notify the Contractor of any such claim in writing and tender the defense thereof within a reasonable time; and b) The Contractor will have sole control of the defense of any action on such claim and all negotiations for its settlement or compromise; provided that (i) when substantial principles of govemment or public law are involved, when litigation might create precedent affecting future State operations or liability, or when involvement of the State is otherwise mandated by law, the State may participate in such action at its own expense with respect to attorneys' fees and costs (but not liability); (ii) where a settlement would impose liability on the State, affect principles of California government or public law, or impact the authority of the State, the Department of General Services will have the right to approve or disapprove any settlement or compromise, which approval will not unreasonably be withheld or delayed; and (iii) the State will reasonably cooperate in the defense and in any related settlement negotiations. 9. ASSIGNMENT: This Contract shall not be assignable by the Contractor in whole or in part without the written consent of the State The State's consent shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. For the purpose of this paragraph, the State will not unreasonably prohibit the Contractor from freely assigning its right to payment, provided that the Contractor remains responsible for its obligations hereunder 10. WAIVER OF RIGHTS: Any action or inaction by the State or the failure of the State on any occasion, to enforce any right or provision of the Contract, shall not be construed to be a waiver by the State of its rights hereunder and shall not prevent the State from enforcing such provision or right on any future occasion. The rights and remedies of the State herein are cumulative and are in addition to any other rights or remedies that the State may have at law or in equity. 11. ORDER OF PRECEDENCE: In the event of any inconsistency between the articles, attachments, specifications or provisions which constitute this Contract, the following order of precedence shall apply: a) These General Provisions — Information Technology (In the instances provided herein where the paragraph begins: "Unless otherwise specified in the Statement of Work" provisions specified in the Statement of Work replacing these paragraphs shall take precedence over the paragraph referenced in these General Provisions); b) Contract form, i.e., Purchase Order STD 65, Standard Agreement STD 213, etc , and any amendments thereto; c) Statement of Work, including any specifications incorporated by reference herein; d) Cost worksheets; and e) All other attachments incorporated in the Contract by reference. 12. PACKING AND SHIPMENT: a) All Goods are to be packed in suitable containers for protection in shipment and storage, and in accordance with applicable specifications. Each container of a multiple container shipment shall be identified to: i) show the number of the container and the total number of containers in the shipment; and ii) the number of the container in which the packing sheet has been enclosed b) All shipments by the Contractor or its subcontractors must include packing sheets identifying: the State's Contract number; item number; quantity and unit of measure; part number and description of the Goods shipped; and appropriate evidence of inspection, if required. Goods for different Contracts shall be listed on separate packing sheets c) Shipments must be made as specified in this Contract, as it may be amended, or otherwise directed in writing by the State's Transportation Management Unit within the Department of General Services, Procurement Division. 13. TRANSPORTATION COSTS AND OTHER FEES OR EXPENSES: No charge for delivery, drayage, express, parcel post, packing, cartage, insurance, license fees, permits, cost of bonds, or for any other purpose will be paid by the State unless expressly included and itemized in the Contract. a) The Contractor must strictly follow Contract requirements regarding Free on Board (F.O.B.), freight terms and routing instructions The State may permit use of an alternate carrier at no additional cost to the State with advance written authorization of the Buyer. b) If "prepay and add" is selected, supporting freight bills are required when over $50, unless an exact freight charge is approved by the Transportation Management Unit within the Department of General Services Procurement Division and a waiver is granted. • c) On "F O.B. Shipping Point" transactions, should any shipments under the Contract be received by the State in a damaged condition and any related freight loss and damage claims filed against the carrier or carriers be wholly or partially declined by the carrier or carriers with the inference that damage was the result of the act of the shipper such as inadequate packaging or loading or some inherent defect in the Equipment and/or material, the Contractor, on request of the State, shall at Contractor's own expense assist the State in establishing carrier liability by supplying evidence that the Equipment and/or material was properly constructed, manufactured, packaged, and secured to withstand normal transportation conditions 14. DELIVERY: The Contractor shall strictly adhere to the delivery and completion schedules specified in this Contract. Time, if stated as a number of days, shall mean calendar days unless otherwise specified The quantities specified herein are the only quantities required. If the Contractor delivers in excess of the quantities specified herein, the State shall not be required to make any payment for the excess Deliverables, and may return them to Contractor at the Contractors expense or utilize any other rights available to the State at law or in equity. 15. SUBSTITUTIONS: Substitution of Deliverables may not be tendered without advance written consent of the Buyer. The Contractor shall not use any specification in lieu of those contained in the Contract without written consent of the Buyer. 16. INSPECTION, ACCEPTANCE AND REJECTION: Unless otherwise specified in the Statement of Work: a) When acquiring Commercial Hardware or Commercial Software, the State shall rely on Contractor's existing quality assurance system as a substitute for State inspection and testing. For all other acquisitions, Contractor and its subcontractors will provide and maintain a quality assurance system acceptable to the State covering Deliverables and services under this Contract and will tender to the State only those Deliverables that have been inspected and found to conform to this Contract's requirements. The Contractor will keep records evidencing inspections and their result, and will make these records available to the State during Contract performance and for three years after final payment. The Contractor shall permit the State to review procedures, practices, processes, and related documents to determine the acceptability of the Contractor's quality assurance System or other similar business practices related to performance of the Contract Page 3 of 12 GSPD-401 IT (REVISED AND EFFECTIVE 11/27/2013) GENERAL PROVISIONS - b) All Deliverables may be subject to inspection and test by the State or its authorized representatives. c) The Contractor and its subcontractors shall provide all reasonable facilities for the safety and convenience of inspectors at no additional cost to the State. The Contractor shall furnish to inspectors all information and data as may be reasonably required to perform their inspection. d) Subject to subsection 16 (a) above, all Deliverables may be subject to final inspection, test and acceptance by the State at destination, notwithstanding any payment or inspection at source.. e) The State shall give written notice of rejection of Deliverables delivered or services performed hereunder within a reasonable time after receipt of such Deliverables or performance of such services. Such notice of rejection will state the respects in which the Deliverables do not substantially conform to their specifications. If the State does not provide such notice of rejection within fifteen (15) days of delivery for purchases of Commercial Hardware or Commercial Software or thirty (30) days of delivery for all other purchases, such Deliverables and services will be deemed to have been accepted Acceptance by the State will be final and irreversible, except as it relates to latent defects, fraud, and gross mistakes amounting to fraud Acceptance shall not be construed to waive any warranty rights that the State might have at law or by express reservation in this Contract with respect to any nonconformity. f) Unless otherwise specified in the Statement of Work, title to Equipment shall remain with the Contractor and assigns, if any, until such time as successful acceptance testing has been achieved. Title to a special feature installed on a Machine and for which only a single installation charge was paid shall pass to the State at no additional charge, together with title to the Machine on which it was installed. 17. SAMPLES: a) Samples of items may be required by the State for inspection and specification testing and must be furnished free of expense to the State. The samples fumished must be identical in all respects to the products bid and/or specified in the Contract. b) Samples, if not destroyed by tests, may, upon request made at the time the sample is furnished, be returned at the Contractor's expense 18. WARRANTY: a) Unless otherwise specified in the Statement of Work, the warranties in this subsection a) begin upon delivery of the goods or services in question and end one (1) year thereafter The Contractor warrants that (i) Deliverables and services furnished hereunder will substantially conform to the requirements of this Contract (including without limitation all descriptions, specifications, and drawings identified in the Statement of Work), and (ii) the Deliverables will be- free from material defects in materials and workmanship. Where the parties have agreed to design specifications (such as a Detailed Design Document) and incorporated the same or equivalent in the Statement of Work directly or by reference, the Contractor will warrant that it's Deliverables provide all material functionality required thereby. In addition to the other warranties set forth herein, where the Contract calls for delivery of Commercial Software, the Contractor warrants that such Software wit perform in accordance with its license and accompanying Documentation. The State's approval of designs or specifications furnished by Contractor shall not relieve the Contractor of its obligations under this warranty. b) The Contractor warrants that Deliverables furnished hereunder (i) will be free, at the time of delivery, of harmful code (i.e. computer viruses, worms, trap doors, time bombs, disabling code, or any similar malicious mechanism designed to interfere with the intended operation of, or cause damage to, computers, data, or Software); and (ii) will not infringe or violate any U.S. Intellectual Property Right INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, if the State believes that harmful code may be present in any Commercial Software delivered hereunder, the Contractor will, upon the State's request, provide a new or clean install of the Software. c) Unless otherwise specified in the Statement of Work: (i) The Contractor does not warrant that any Software provided hereunder is error -free or that it will run without immaterial interruption. (ii) The Contractor does not warrant and will have no responsibility for a claim to the extent that it arises directly from (A) a modification made by the State, unless such modification is approved or directed by the Contractor, (B) use of Software in combination with or on products other than as specified by the Contractor, or (C) misuse by the State. (iii) Where the Contractor resells Commercial Hardware or Commercial Software it purchased from a third party, Contractor, to the extent it is legally able to do so, will pass through any such third party warranties to the State and will reasonably cooperate in enforcing them. Such warranty pass-through will not relieve the Contractor from Contractor's warranty obligations set forth above d) All warranties, including special warranties specified elsewhere herein, shall inure to the State, its successors, assigns, customer agencies and governmental users of the Deliverables or services. e) Except as may be specifically provided in the Statement of Work or elsewhere in this Contract, for any breach of the warranties provided in this Section, the State's exclusive remedy and the Contractor's sole obligation will be limited to: (i) re -performance, repair, or replacement of the nonconforming Deliverable (including without limitation an infringing Deliverable) or service: or (ii) should the State in its sole discretion consent, refund of all amounts paid by the State for the nonconforming Deliverable or service and payment to the State of any additional amounts necessary to equal the State's Cost to Cover. "Cost to Cover" means the cost, properly mitigated, of procuring Deliverables or services of equivalent capability, function, and performance The payment obligation in subsection (e)(ii) above will not exceed the limits on the Contractor's liability set forth in the Section entitled "Limitation of Liability." f) EXCEPT FOR THE EXPRESS WARRANTIES SPECIFIED IN THIS SECTION, THE CONTRACTOR MAKES NO WARRANTIES EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE 19. SAFETY AND ACCIDENT PREVENTION: In performing work under this Contract on State premises, the Contractor shall conform to any specific safety requirements contained in the Contract or as required by law or regulation. The Contractor shall take any additional precautions as the State may reasonably require for safety and accident prevention purposes. Any violation of such rules and requirements, unless promptly corrected, shall be grounds for termination of this Contract in accordance with the default provisions hereof 20. INSURANCE: The Contractor shall maintain all commercial general liability insurance, workers' compensation insurance and any other insurance required under the Contract. The Contractor shall furnish insurance certificate(s) evidencing required insurance coverage acceptable to the State, including endorsements showing the State as an "additional insured" if required under the Contract Any required endorsements requested by the State must be separately provided; merely referring to such coverage on the certificates(s) is insufficient for this purpose When performing work on state owned or controlled property, Contractor shall provide a waiver of subrogation in favor of the State for its workers' compensation policy. 21.TERMINATION FOR NON -APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS: Page 4 of 12 GSPD-401 IT (REVISED AND EFFECTIVE 11/27/2013) GENERAL PROVISIONS- INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY a) If the term of this Contract extends into fiscal years subsequent to that in which it is approved, such continuation of the Contract is contingent on the appropriation of funds for such purpose by the Legislature. If funds to effect such continued payment are not appropriated, the Contractor agrees to take back any affected Deliverables furnished under this Contract, terminate any services supplied to the State under this Contract, and relieve the State of any further obligation therefor. b) The State agrees that if it appears likely that subsection a) above will be invoked, the State and Contractor shall agree to take all reasonable steps to prioritize work and Deliverables and minimize the incurrence of costs prior to the expiration of funding for this Contract. c) THE STATE AGREES THAT IF PARAGRAPH a) ABOVE IS INVOKED, COMMERCIAL HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE THAT HAS NOT BEEN PAID FOR SHALL BE RETURNED TO THE CONTRACTOR IN SUBSTANTIALLY THE SAME CONDITION IN WHICH DELIVERED TO THE STATE, SUBJECT TO NORMAL WEAR AND TEAR THE STATE FURTHER AGREES TO PAY FOR PACKING, CRATING, TRANSPORTATION TO THE CONTRACTOR'S NEAREST FACILITY AND FOR REIMBURSEMENT TO THE CONTRACTOR FOR EXPENSES INCURRED FOR THEIR ASSISTANCE IN SUCH PACKING AND CRATING. 22. TERMINATION FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE STATE: a) The State may terminate performance of work under this Contract for its convenience in whole or, from time to time, in part, if the Department of General Services, Deputy Director Procurement Division, or designee, determines that a termination is in the State's interest. The Department of General Services, Deputy Director, Procurement Division, or designee, shall terminate by delivering to the Contractor a Notice of Termination specifying the extent of termination and the effective date thereof. b) After receipt of a Notice of Termination, and except as directed by the State, the Contractor shall immediately proceed with the following obligations, as applicable, regardless of any delay in determining or adjusting any amounts due under this clause. The Contractor shall: (i) Stop work as specified in the Notice of Termination. (ii) Place no further subcontracts for materials, services, or facilities, except as necessary to complete the continuing portion of the Contract. (iii) Terminate all subcontracts to the extent they relate to the work terminated. (iv) Settle all outstanding liabilities and termination settlement proposals arising from the termination of subcontracts; c) After termination, the Contractor shall submit a final termination settlement proposal to the State in the form and with the information prescribed by the State. The Contractor shall submit the proposal promptly, but no later than 90 days after the effective date of termination, unless a different time is provided in the Statement of Work or in the Notice of Termination. d) The Contractor and the State may agree upon the whole or any part of the amount to be paid as requested under subsection (c) above. e) Unless otherwise set forth in the Statement of Work, if the Contractor and the State fail to agree on the amount to be paid because of the termination for convenience, the State will pay the Contractor the following amounts; provided that in no event will total payments exceed the amount payable to the Contractor if the Contract had been fully performed: (i) The Contract price for Deliverables or services accepted or retained by the State and not previously paid for, adjusted for any savings on freight and other charges; and (ii) The total of: A) The reasonable costs incurred in the performance of the work terminated, including initial costs and preparatory expenses allocable thereto, but excluding any cost attributable to Deliverables or services paid or to be paid; B) The reasonable cost of settling and paying termination settlement proposals under terminated subcontracts that are properly chargeable to the terminated portion of the Contract; and C) Reasonable storage, transportation, demobilization, unamortized overhead and capital costs, and other costs reasonably incurred by the Contractor in winding down and terminating its work. f) The Contractor will use generally accepted accounting principles, or accounting principles otherwise agreed to in writing by the parties, and sound business practices in determining all costs claimed, agreed to, or determined under this clause. 23. TERMINATION FOR DEFAULT: a) The State may, subject to the clause titled "Force Majeure" and to sub -section d) below, by written notice of default to the Contractor, terminate this Contract in whole or in part if the Contractor fails to: i) Deliver the Deliverables or perform the services within the time specified in the Contract or any amendment thereto; ii) Make progress, so that the lack of progress endangers performance of this Contract; or iii) Perform any of the other provisions of this Contract. b) The State's right to terminate this Contract under sub -section a) above, may be exercised only if the failure constitutes a material breach of this Contract and if the Contractor does not cure such failure within the time frame stated in the State's cure notice, which in no event will be less than fifteen (15) days, unless the Statement of Work calls for a different period. c) If the State terminates this Contract in whole or in part pursuant to this Section, it may acquire, under terms and in the manner the Buyer considers appropriate, Deliverables or services similar to those terminated, and the Contractor will be liable to the State for any excess costs for those Deliverables and services, including without limitation costs third party vendors charge for Manufacturing Materials (but subject to the clause entitled "Limitation of Liability"). However, the Contractor shall continue the work not terminated. d) If the Contract is terminated for default, the State may require the Contractor to transfer title, or in the case of licensed Software, license, and deliver to the State, as directed by the Buyer, any: (i) completed Deliverables, (ii) partially completed Deliverables, and, (iii) subject to provisions of sub -section e) below, Manufacturing Materials related to the terminated portion of this Contract. Nothing in this sub -section d) will be construed to grant the State rights to Deliverables that it would not have received had this Contract been fully performed. Upon direction of the Buyer, the Contractor shall also protect and preserve property in its possession in which the State has an interest. e) The State shall pay Contract price for completed Deliverables delivered and accepted and items the State requires the Contractor to transfer under section (d) above. Unless the Statement of Work calls for different procedures or requires no -charge delivery of materials, the Contractor and Buyer shall attempt to agree on the amount of payment for Manufacturing Materials and other materials delivered and accepted by the State for the protection and preservation of the property; provided that where the Contractor has billed the State for any such materials, no additional charge will apply Failure to agree will constitute a dispute under the Disputes clause. The State may withhold from these amounts any sum it determines to be necessary to protect the State against loss because of outstanding liens or claims of former lien holders. Page 5 of 12 GSPD-401IT (REVISED AND EFFECTIVE 11/27/2013) GENERAL PROVISIONS- INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY f) If, after termination, it is determined by a final decision that the Contractor was not in default, the rights and obligations of the parties shall be the same as if the termination had been issued for the convenience of the State. Both parties, State and Contractor, upon any termination for default, have a duty to mitigate the damages suffered by it. h) The rights and remedies of the State in this clause are in addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law or under this Contract, and are subject to the clause titled "Limitation of Liability " 24. FORCE MAJEURE: Except for defaults of subcontractors at any tier, the Contractor shall not be liable for any excess costs if the failure to perform the Contract arises from causes beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the Contractor. Examples of such causes include, but are not limited to: a) Acts of God or of the public enemy, and b) Acts of the federal or State govemment in either its sovereign or contractual capacity. If the failure to perform is caused by the default of a subcontractor at any tier, and if the cause of the default is beyond the control of both the Contractor and subcontractor, and without the fault or negligence of either, the Contractor shall not be liable for any excess costs for failure to perform. 25. RIGHTS AND REMEDIES OF STATE FOR DEFAULT: a) In the event any Deliverables furnished or services provided by the Contractor in the performance of the Contract should fail to conform to the requirements herein, or to the sample submitted by the Contractor, the State may reject the same, and it shall become the duty of the Contractor to reclaim and remove the item promptly or to correct the performance of services, without expense to the State, and immediately replace all such rejected items with others conforming to the Contract. b) In addition to any other rights and remedies the State may have, the State may require the Contractor, at Contractor's expense, to ship Deliverables via air freight or expedited routing to avoid or minimize actual or potential delay if the delay is the fault of the Contractor. c) In the event of the termination of the Contract, either in whole or in part, by reason of default or breach by the Contractor, any loss or damage sustained by the State in procuring any items which the Contractor agreed to supply shall be bome and paid for by the Contractor (but subject to the clause entitled "Limitation of Liability'). d) The State reserves the right to offset the reasonable cost of all damages caused to the State against any outstanding invoices or amounts owed to the Contractor or to make a claim against the Contractor therefore. 26. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY: a) Except as may be otherwise approved by the Department of General Services Deputy Director, Procurement Division or their designee, Contractor's liability for damages to the State for any cause whatsoever, and regardless of the form of action, whether in Contract or in tort, shall be limited to the Purchase Price. For purposes of this sub -section a), "Purchase Price" will mean the aggregate Contract price; except that, with respect to a Contract under which multiple purchase orders will be issued (e.g., a Master Agreement or Multiple Award Schedule contract), "Purchase Price" will mean the total price of the purchase order for the Deliverable(s) or service(s) that gave rise to the loss, such that the Contractor will have a separate limitation of liability for each purchase order b) The foregoing limitation of liability shall not apply (i) to any liability under the General Provisions entitled "Compliance with Statutes and Regulations" (ii) to liability under the General Provisions; entitled "Patent, Copyright, and Trade Secret Indemnity" or to any other liability (including without limitation indemnification obligations) for infringement of third party intellectual property rights; (iii) to claims arising under provisions herein calling for indemnification for third party claims against the State for death, bodily injury to persons or damage to real or tangible personal property caused by the g) Contractor's negligence or willful misconduct; or (iv) to costs or attorney's fees that the State becomes entitled to recover as a prevailing party in -any action c) The State's liability for damages for any cause whatsoever, and regardless of the form of action, whether in Contract or in tort, shall be limited to the Purchase Price, as that term is defined in subsection a) above Nothing herein shall be construed to waive or limit the State's sovereign immunity or any other immunity from suit provided by law. d) In no event will either the Contractor or the State be liable for consequential, incidental, indirect, special, or punitive damages, even if notification has been given as to the possibility of such damages, except (i) to the extent that the Contractor's liability for such damages is specifically set forth in the Statement of Work or (ii) to the extent that the Contractor's liability for such damages arises out of sub- section b)(i), b)(ii), or b)(iv) above. 27. CONTRACTOR'S LIABILITY FOR INJURY TO PERSONS OR DAMAGE TO PROPERTY: a) The Contractor shall be liable for damages arising out of injury to the person and/or damage to the property of the State, employees of the State, persons designated by the State for training, or any other person(s) other than agents or employees of the Contractor, designated by the State for any purpose, prior to, during, or subsequent to delivery, installation, acceptance, and use of the Deliverables either at the Contractor's site or at the State's place of business, provided that the injury or damage was caused by the fault or negligence of the Contractor. b) The Contractor shall not be liable for damages arising out of or caused by an alteration or an Attachment not made or installed by the Contractor, or for damage to alterations or Attachments that may result from the normal operation and maintenance of the Deliverables provided by the Contractor during the Contract. 28. INDEMNIFICATION: The Contractor agrees to indemnify, defend and save harmless the State, its officers, agents and employees from any and all third party claims, costs (including without limitation reasonable attorneys' fees), and losses due to the injury or death of any individual, or the loss or damage to any real or tangible personal property, resulting from the willful misconduct or negligent acts or omissions of the Contractor or any of its affiliates, agents, subcontractors, employees, suppliers, or laborers fumishing or supplying work, services, materials, or supplies in connection with the performance of this Contract. Such defense and payment will be conditional upon the following: a) The State will notify the Contractor of any such claim in writing and tender the defense thereof within a reasonable time; and b) The Contractor will have sole control of the defense of any action on such claim and all negotiations for its settlement or compromise; provided that (i) when substantial principles of government or public law are involved, when litigation might create precedent affecting future State operations or liability, or when involvement of the State is otherwise mandated by law, the State may participate in such action at its own expense with respect to attorneys' fees and costs (but not liability); (ii) where a settlement would impose liability on the State, affect principles of Califomia government or public law, or impact the authority of the State, the Department of General Services will have the right to approve or disapprove any settlement or compromise, which approval will not unreasonably be withheld or delayed; and (iii) the State will reasonably cooperate in the defense and in any related settlement negotiations 29. INVOICES: Unless otherwise specified, invoices shall be sent to the address set forth herein. Invoices shall be submitted in triplicate and shall include the Contract number; release order number (if applicable); item number; unit price, extended item price and invoice total amount State sales tax and/or use tax shall be itemized separately and added to each invoice as applicable. Page 6 of 12 GSPD-401 IT (REVISED AND EFFECTIVE 11/27/2013) GENERAL PROVISIONS -- 30. REQUIRED PAYMENT DATE: Payment will be made in accordance with the provisions of the California Prompt Payment Act, Government Code Section 927 et. seq Unless expressly exempted by statute, the Act requires State agencies to pay properly submitted, undisputed invoices not more than 45 days after (i) the date of acceptance of Deliverables or performance of services; or (ii) receipt of an undisputed invoice, whichever is later. 31. TAXES: Unless otherwise required by law, the State of California is exempt from Federal excise taxes. The State will only pay for any State or local sales or use taxes on the services rendered or Goods supplied to the State pursuant to this Contract. 32. NEWLY MANUFACTURED GOODS: All Goods furnished under this Contract shall be newly manufactured Goods or certified as new and warranted as new by the manufacturer; used or reconditioned Goods are prohibited, unless otherwise specified. 33. CONTRACT MODIFICATION: No amendment or variation of the terms of this Contract shall be valid unless made in writing, signed by the parties and approved as required. No oral understanding or agreement not incorporated in the Contract is binding on any of the parties 34. CONFIDENTIALITY OF DATA: All financial, statistical, personal, technical and other data and information relating to the State's operation which are designated confidential by the State and made available to the Contractor in order to carry out this Contract, or which become available to the Contractor in carrying out this Contract, shall be protected by the Contractor from unauthorized use and disclosure through the observance of the same or more effective procedural requirements as are applicable to the State. The identification of all such confidential data and information as well as the State's procedural requirements for protection of such data and information from unauthorized use and disclosure shall be provided by the State in writing to the Contractor. If the methods and procedures employed by the Contractor for the protection of the Contractor's data and information are deemed by the State to be adequate for the protection of the State's confidential information, such methods and procedures may be used, with the written consent of the State, to carry out the intent of this paragraph. The Contractor shall not be required under the provisions of this paragraph to keep confidential any data or information which is or becomes publicly available, is already rightfully in the Contractor's possession without obligation of confidentiality, is independently developed by the Contractor outside the scope of this Contract, or is rightfully obtained from third parties. 35. NEWS RELEASES: Unless otherwise exempted, news releases, endorsements, advertising, and social media content pertaining to this Contract shall not be made without prior written approval of the Department of General Services. 36. DOCUMENTATION: a) The Contractor agrees to provide to the State, at no charge, all Documentation as described within the Statement of Work, and updated versions thereof, which are necessary or useful to the State in its use of the Equipment or Software provided hereunder. The Contractor agrees to provide additional Documentation at prices not in excess of charges made by the Contractor to its other customers for similar Documentation. b) If the Contractor is unable to perform maintenance or the State desires to perform its own maintenance on Equipment purchased under this Contract then upon written notice by the State the Contractor will provide at Contractor's then current rates and fees adequate and reasonable assistance including relevant Documentation to allow the State to maintain the Equipment based on the Contractors methodology. The Contractor agrees that the State may reproduce such Documentation for its own use in maintaining the Equipment. If the Contractor is unable to perform maintenance, the Contractor agrees to license any other Contractor that the State may have hired to maintain the Equipment to use the above noted Documentation. The State agrees to include the Contractor's copyright notice on INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY any such Documentation reproduced, in accordance with copyright instructions to be provided by the Contractor. 37. RIGHTS IN WORK PRODUCT: a) All inventions, discoveries, intellectual property, technical communications and records originated or prepared by the Contractor pursuant to this Contract including papers, reports, charts, computer programs, and other Documentation or improvements thereto, and including the Contractor's administrative communications and records relating to this Contract (collectively, the 'Work Product"), shall be the Contractor's exclusive property. The provisions of this sub -section a) may be revised in a Statement of Work b) Software and other materials developed or otherwise obtained by or for the Contractor or its affiliates independently of this Contract or applicable purchase order ("Pre -Existing Materials') do not constitute Work Product. If the Contractor creates derivative works of Pre -Existing Materials, the elements of such derivative works created pursuant to this Contract constitute Work Product, but other elements do not Nothing in this Section 37 will be construed to interfere with the Contractor's or its affiliates' ownership of Pre -Existing Materials. c) The State will have Government Purpose Rights to the Work Product as Deliverable or delivered to the State hereunder. "Govemment Purpose Rights" are the unlimited, irrevocable, worldwide, perpetual, royalty -free, non-exclusive rights and licenses to use, modify, reproduce, perform, release, display, create derivative works from, and disclose the Work Product. "Government Purpose Rights" also include the right to release or disclose the Work Product outside the State for any State government purpose and to authorize recipients to use, modify, reproduce, perform, release, display, create derivative works from, and disclose the Work Product for any State government purpose. Such recipients of the Work Product may include, without limitation, State Contractors, California local govemments, the U S federal government, and the State and local govemments of other states. "Government Purpose Rights" do not include any rights to use, modify. reproduce, perform, release, display create derivative works from, or disclose the Work Product for any commercial purpose. d) The ideas, concepts, know-how, or techniques relating to data processing, developed during the course of this Contract by the Contractor or jointly by the Contractor and the State may be used by either party without obligation of notice or accounting. e) This Contract shall not preclude the Contractor from developing materials outside this Contract that are competitive, irrespective of their similarity to materials which might be delivered to the State pursuant to this Contract 38. SOFTWARE LICENSE: Unless otherwise specified in the Statement of Work, the Contractor hereby grants to the State and the State accepts from the Contractor, subject to the terms and conditions of this Contract, a perpetual, irrevocable, royalty -free, non-exclusive, license to use the Software Products in this Contract (hereinafter referred to as "Software Products"). a) The State may use the Software Products in the conduct of its own business, and any division thereof b) The license granted above authorizes the State to use the Software Products in machine-readable form on the Computer System located at the site(s) specified in the Statement of Work Said Computer System and its associated units (collectively referred to as CPU) are as designated in the Statement of Work If the designated CPU is inoperative due to malfunction, the license herein granted shall be temporarily extended to authorize the State to use the Software Products, in machine-readable form, on any other State CPU until the designated CPU is returned to operation. Page 7 of 12 GSPD-401 IT (REVISED AND EFFECTIVE 11/27/2013) GENERAL PROVISIONS- INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY c) By prior written notice, the State may redesignate the CPU in which the Software Products are to be used provided that the redesignated CPU is substantially similar in size and scale at no additional cost. The redesignation shall not be limited to the original site and will be effective upon the date specified in the notice of redesignation d) Acceptance of Commercial Software (including third party Software) and Custom Software will be govemed by the terms and conditions of this Contract. 39. PROTECTION OF PROPRIETARY SOFTWARE AND OTHER PROPRIETARY DATA: a) The State agrees that all material appropriately marked or identified in writing as proprietary, and furnished hereunder are provided for the State's exclusive use for the purposes of this Contract only. All such proprietary data shall remain the property of the Contractor The State agrees to take all reasonable steps to insure that such proprietary data are not disclosed to others, without prior written consent of the Contractor, subject to the California Public Records Act. b) The State will insure, prior to disposing of any media, that any licensed materials contained thereon have been erased or otherwise destroyed. c) The State agrees that it will take appropriate action by instruction, agreement or otherwise with its employees or other persons permitted access to licensed software and other proprietary data to satisfy its obligations in this Contract with respect to use, copying, modification, protection and security of proprietary software and other proprietary data. 40. RIGHT TO COPY OR MODIFY: a) Any Software Product provided by the Contractor in machine-readable form may be copied, in whole or in part, in printed or machine-readable form for use by the State with the designated CPU, to perform one-time benchmark tests, for archival or emergency restart purposes, to replace a worn copy, to understand the contents of such machine- readable material, or to modify the Software Product as provided below provided, however, that no more than the number of printed copies and machine-readable copies as specified in the Statement of Work will be in existence under this Contract at any time without prior written consent of the Contractor Such consent shall not be unreasonably withheld by the Contractor. The original, and any copies of the Software Product, in whole or in part, which are made hereunder shall be the property of the Contractor. b) The State may modify any non -personal computer Software Product, in machine-readable form, for its own use and merge it into other program material. Any portion of the Software Product included in any merged program material shall be used only on the designated CPUs and shall be subject to the terms and conditions of the Contract. 41. FUTURE RELEASES: Unless otherwise specifically provided in this Contract, or the Statement of Work, if improved versions, e.g., patches, bug fixes, updates or releases, of any Software Product are developed by the contractor, and are made available to other licensees, they will be made available to the State at no additional cost only if such are made available to other licensees at no additional cost. If the Contractor offers new versions or upgrades to the Software Product, they shall be made available to the State at the State's option at a price no greater than the Contract price plus a price increase proportionate to the increase from the list price of the original version to that of the new version, if any. If the Software Product has no list price, such price increase will be proportionate to the increase in average price from the original to the new version, if any, as estimated by the Contractor in good faith. 42. ENCRYPTION/CPU ID AUTHORIZATION CODES: a) When Encryption/CPU Identification (ID) authorization codes are required to operate the Software Products, the Contractor will provide all codes to the State with delivery of the Software. b) In case of an inoperative CPU, the Contractor will provide a temporary encryption/CPU ID authorization code to the State for use on a temporarily authorized CPU until the designated CPU is retumed to operation. c) When changes in designated CPUs occur, the State will notify the Contractor via telephone and/or facsimile/e-mail of such change Upon receipt of such notice, the Contractor will issue via telephone and/or facsimile/e-mail to the State within 24 hours, a temporary encryption ID authorization code for use on the newly designated CPU until such time as permanent code is assigned. 43. PATENT, COPYRIGHT AND TRADE SECRET INDEMNITY: a) Contractor will indemnify, defend, and save harmless the State, its officers, agents, and employees, from any and all third party claims, costs (including without limitation reasonable attorneys' fees), and losses for infringement or violation of any U S Intellectual Property Right by any product or service provided hereunder. With respect to claims arising from computer Hardware or Software manufactured by a third party and sold by Contractor as a reseller, Contractor will pass through to the State such indemnity rights as it receives from such third party ("Third Party Obligation") and will cooperate in enforcing them; provided that if the third party manufacturer fails to honor the Third Party Obligation, Contractor will provide the State with indemnity protection equal to that called for by the Third Party Obligation, but in no event greater than that called for in the first sentence of this Section ). The provisions of the preceding sentence apply only to third party computer Hardware or Software sold as a distinct unit and accepted by the State Unless a Third Party Obligation provides otherwise, the defense and payment obligations set forth in this Section will be conditional upon the following: (i) The State will notify the Contractor of any such claim in writing and tender the defense thereof within a reasonable time; and (ii) The Contractor will have sole control of the defense of any action on such claim and all negotiations for its settlement or compromise; provided that (a) when substantial principles of government or public law are involved, when litigation might create precedent affecting future State operations or liability, or when involvement of the State is otherwise mandated by law, the State may participate in such action at its own expense with respect to attorneys' fees and costs (but not liability); (b) where a settlement would impose liability on the State, affect principles of California govemment or public law, or impact the authority of the State, the Department of General Services will have the right to approve or disapprove any settlement or compromise, which approval will not unreasonably be withheld or delayed; and (c) the State will reasonably cooperate in the defense and in any related settlement negotiations b) Should the Deliverables, or the operation thereof, become, or in the Contractor's opinion are likely to become, the subject of a claim of infringement or violation of a U.S Intellectual Property Right, the State shall permit the Contractor, at its option and expense, either to procure for the State the right to continue using the Deliverables, or to replace or modify the same so that they become non -infringing If none of these options can reasonably be taken, or if the use of such Deliverables by the State shall be prevented by injunction, the Contractor agrees to take back such Deliverables and make every reasonable effort to assist the State in procuring substitute Deliverables. If, in the sole opinion of the State, the return of such Page 8 of 12 GSPD-401 IT (REVISED AND EFFECTIVE 11/27/2013) GENERAL PROVISIONS- INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY infringing Deliverables makes the retention of other Deliverables acquired from the Contractor under this Contract impractical, the State shall then have the option of terminating such Contracts, or applicable portions thereof, without penalty or termination charge. The Contractor agrees to take back such Deliverables and refund any sums the State has paid the Contractor less any reasonable amount for use or damage. c) The Contractor shall have no liability to the State under any provision of this clause with respect to any claim of patent, copyright or trade secret infringement which is based upon: (i) The combination or utilization of Deliverables fumished hereunder with Equipment, Software or devices not made or fumished by the Contractor; or, (ii) The operation of Equipment furnished by the Contractor under the control of any Operating Software other than, or in addition to, the current version of Contractor -supplied Operating Software; or (iii) The modification initiated by the State, or a third party at the State's direction, of any Deliverable furnished hereunder; or (iv) The combination or utilization of Software fumished hereunder with non -contractor supplied Software. d) The Contractor certifies that it has appropriate systems and controls in place to ensure that State funds will not be used in the performance of this Contract for the acquisition, operation or maintenance of computer Software in violation of copyright laws. 44. DISPUTES: a) The parties shall deal in good faith and attempt to resolve potential disputes informally. If the dispute persists, the Contractor shall submit to the contracting Department Director or designee a mitten demand for a final decision regarding the disposition of any dispute between the parties arising under, related to or involving this Contract. Contractor's mitten demand shall be fully supported by factual information, and if such demand Involves a cost adjustment to the Contract, the Contractor shall include with the demand a mitten statement signed by an authorized person indicating that the demand is made in good faith, that the supporting data are accurate and complete and that the amount requested accurately reflects the Contract adjustment for which Contractor believes the State is liable. The contracting Department Director or designee shall have 30 days after receipt of Contractor's written demand invoking this Section "Disputes" to render a mitten decision. If a written decision is not rendered within 30 days after receipt of the Contractor's demand, it shall be deemed a decision adverse to the Contractor's contention. If the Contractor is not satisfied with the decision of the contracting Department Director or designee, the Contractor may appeal the decision, in writing, within 15 days of its issuance (or the expiration of the 30 day period in the event no decision is rendered by the contracting department), to the Department of General Services, Deputy Director, Procurement Division, who shall have 45 days to render a final decision. If the Contractor does not appeal the decision of the contracting Department Director or designee, the decision shall be conclusive and binding regarding the dispute and the Contractor shall be barred from commencing an action in court, or with the Victims Compensation Government Claims Board, for failure to exhaust Contractor's administrative remedies. b) Pending the final resolution of any dispute arising under, related to or involving this Contract, Contractor agrees to diligently proceed with the performance of this Contract, including the delivery of Goods or providing of services in accordance with the State's instructions regarding this Contract. Contractor's failure to diligently proceed in accordance with the State's instructions regarding this Contract shall be considered a material breach of this Contract. c) Any final decision of the State shall be expressly identified as such, shall be in writing, and shall be signed by the Deputy Director, Procurement Division if an appeal was made. If the Deputy Director, Procurement Division fails to render a final decision within 45 days after receipt of the Contractor's appeal for a final decision, it shall be deemed a final decision adverse to the Contractor's contentions The State's final decision shall be conclusive and binding regarding the dispute unless the Contractor commences an action in a court of competent jurisdiction to contest such decision within 90 days following the date of the final decision or one (1) year following the accrual of the cause of action, whichever is later d) For disputes involving purchases made by the Department of General Services, Procurement Division, the Contractor shall submit to the Department Director or designee a written demand for a final decision, which shall be fully supported in the manner described in subsection a above. The Department Director or designee shall have 30 days to render a final decision. If a final decision is not rendered within 30 days after receipt of the Contractor's demand, it shall be deemed a final decision adverse to the Contractor's contention. The final decision shall be conclusive and binding regarding the dispute unless the Contractor commences an action in a court of competent jurisdiction to contest such decision within 90 days following the date of the final decision or one (1) year following the accrual of the cause of action, whichever is later. e) The dates of decision and appeal in this section may be modified by mutual consent, as applicable, excepting the time to commence an action in a court of competent jurisdiction. 45. STOP WORK: a) The State may, at any time, by written Stop Work Order to the Contractor, require the Contractor to stop all, or any part, of the work called for by this Contract for a period up to 45 days after the Stop Work Order is delivered to the Contractor, and for any further period to which the parties may agree. The Stop Work Order shall be specifically identified as such and shall indicate it is issued under this clause. Upon receipt of the Stop Work Order, the Contractor shall immediately comply with its terms and take all reasonable steps to minimize the incurrence of costs allocable to the work covered by the Stop Work Order during the period of work stoppage. Within a period of 45 days after a Stop Work Order is delivered to the Contractor, or within any extension of that period to which the parties shall have agreed, the State shall either. (i) Cancel the Stop Work Order; or (ii) Terminate the work covered by the Stop Work Order as provided for in the termination for default or the termination for convenience clause of this Contract. b) If a Stop Work Order issued under this clause is canceled or the period of the Stop Work Order or any extension thereof expires, the Contractor shall resume work. The State shall make an equitable adjustment in the delivery schedule, the Contract price, or both, and the Contract shall be modified, in writing, accordingly, if: (i) The Stop Work Order results in an increase in the time required for, or in the Contractor's cost properly allocable to the performance of any part of this Contract; and (ii) The Contractor asserts its right to an equitable adjustment within 60 days after the end of the period of work stoppage; provided, that if the State decides the facts justify the action, the State may receive and act upon a proposal submitted at any time before final payment under this Contract. c) If a Stop Work Order is not canceled and the work covered by the Stop Work Order is terminated in accordance with the provision entitled Termination for the Convenience of the State, the State shall allow reasonable costs resulting from the Stop Work Order in arriving at the termination settlement. Page 9 of 12 GSPD-401 IT GENERAL PROVISIONS - d) The State shall not be liable to the Contractor for loss of profits because of a Stop Work Order issued under this clause. 46. EXAMINATION AND AUDIT: The Contractor agrees that the State or its designated representative shall have the right to review and copy any records and supporting documentation directly pertaining to performance of this Contract. The Contractor agrees to maintain such records for possible audit for a minimum of three (3) years after final payment, unless a longer period of records retention is stipulated The Contractor agrees to allow the auditor(s) access to such records during normal business hours and in such a manner so as to not interfere unreasonably with normal business activities and to allow interviews of any employees or others who might reasonably have information related to such records Further, the Contractor agrees to include a similar right of the State to audit records and interview staff in any subcontract related to performance of this Contract The State shall provide reasonable advance written notice of such audit(s) to the Contractor. 47. FOLLOW-ON CONTRACTS: a) If the Contractor or its affiliates provides Technical Consulting and Direction (as defined below), the Contractor and its affiliates: (i) will not be awarded a subsequent Contract to supply the service or system, or any significant component thereof, that is used for or in connection with any subject of such Technical Consulting and Direction; and (ii) will not act as consultant to any person or entity that does receive a Contract described in sub -section (i). This prohibition will continue for one (1) year after termination of this Contract or completion of the Technical Consulting and Direction, whichever comes later b) "Technical Consulting and Direction" means services for which the Contractor received compensation from the State and includes: (i) development of or assistance in the development of work statements, specifications, solicitations, or feasibility studies; (ii) development or design of test requirements; (Hi) evaluation of test data; (iv) direction of or evaluation of another Contractor; (v) provision of formal recommendations regarding the acquisition of Information Technology products or services; or (vi) provisions of formal recommendations regarding any of the above. For purposes of this Section, "affiliates" are employees, directors, partners, joint venture participants, parent corporations, subsidiaries, or any other entity controlled by, controlling, or under common control with the Contractor. Control exists when an entity owns or directs more than fifty percent (50%) of the outstanding shares or securities representing the right to vote for the election of directors or other managing authority. c) To the extent permissible by law, the Director of the Department of General Services, or designee, may waive the restrictions set forth in this Section by written notice to the Contractor if the Director determines their application would not be in the State's best interest. Except as prohibited by law, the restrictions of this Section will not apply: (i) to follow-on advice given by vendors of commercial off-the-shelf products, including Software and Hardware, on the operation, integration, repair, or maintenance of such products after sale; or (ii) where the State has entered into a master agreement for Software or services and the scope of work at the time of Contract execution expressly calls for future recommendations among the Contractor's own products. d) The restrictions set forth in this Section are in addition to conflict of interest restrictions imposed on public Contractors (REVISED AND EFFECTIVE 11/27/2013) INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY by California law ("Conflict Laws"). In the event of any inconsistency, such Conflict Laws override the provisions of this Section, even if enacted after execution of this Contract. 48 PRIORITY HIRING CONSIDERATIONS: If this Contract includes services in excess of $200,000, the Contractor shall give priority consideration in filling vacancies in positions funded by the Contract to qualified recipients of aid under Welfare and Institutions Code Section 11200 in accordance with PCC Section 10353. 49. COVENANT AGAINST GRATUITIES: The Contractor warrants that no gratuities (in the form of entertainment, gifts, or otherwise) were offered or given by the Contractor, or any agent or representative of the Contractor, to any officer or employee of the State with a view toward securing the Contract or securing favorable treatment with respect to any determinations concerning the performance of the Contract. For breach or violation of this warranty, the State shall have the right to terminate the Contract, either in whole or in part, and any loss or damage sustained by the State in procuring on the open market any items which the Contractor agreed to supply shall be bome and paid for by the Contractor. The rights and remedies of the State provided in this clause shall not be exclusive and are in addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law or in equity. 50. NONDISCRIMINATION CLAUSE: a) During the performance of this Contract, the Contractor and its subcontractors shall not unlawfully discriminate, harass or allow harassment, against any employee or applicant for employment because of sex, sexual orientation, race, color, ancestry, religious creed, national origin, disability (including HIV and AIDS), medical condition (cancer), age, marital status, and denial of family care leave. The Contractor and subcontractors shall insure that the evaluation and treatment of their employees and applicants for employment are free from such discrimination and harassment. The Contractor and subcontractors shall comply with the provisions of the Fair Employment and Housing Act (Govemment Code, Section 12990 et seq.) and the applicable regulations promulgated thereunder (California Code of Regulations, Title 2, Section 7285.0 et seq.). The applicable regulations of the Fair Employment and Housing Commission implementing Government Code Section 12990 (a -f), set forth in Chapter 5 of Division 4 of Title 2 of the California Code of Regulations are incorporated into this Contract by reference and made a part hereof as if set forth in full. The Contractor and its subcontractors shall give written notice of their obligations under this clause to labor organizations with which they have a collective bargaining or other agreement. b) The Contractor shall include the nondiscrimination and compliance provisions of this clause in all subcontracts to perform work under the Contract. 51. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD CERTIFICATION: The Contractor swears under penalty of perjury that no more than one final, unappealable finding of contempt of court by a federal court has been issued against the Contractor within the immediately preceding two-year period because of the Contractor's failure to comply with an order of the National Labor Relations Board. This provision is required by, and shall be construed in accordance with, PCC Section 10296. 52. ASSIGNMENT OF ANTITRUST ACTIONS: Pursuant to Government Code Sections 4552, 4553, and 4554, the following provisions are incorporated herein: a) In submitting a bid to the State, the supplier offers and agrees that if the bid is accepted, it will assign to the State all rights, title, and interest in and to all causes of action it may have under Section 4 of the Clayton Act (15 U.S.0 15) or under the Cartwright Act (Chapter 2, commencing with Section 16700, of Part 2 of Division 7 of the Business and Professions Code), arising from purchases of Goods, material or other items, or services by the supplier for sale to the State pursuant to the solicitation. Such assignment shall Page 10 of 12 GSPD-401IT (REVISED AND EFFECTIVE 11/27/2013) GENERAL PROVISIONS- INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY be made and become effective at the time the State tenders final payment to the supplier. b) If the State receives, either through judgment or settlement a monetary recovery for a cause of action assigned under this chapter, the assignor shall be entitled to receive reimbursement for actual legal costs incurred and may, upon demand, recover from the State any portion of the recovery, including treble damages, attributable to overcharges that were paid by the assignor but were not paid by the State as part of the bid price, less the expenses incurred in obtaining that portion of the recovery c) Upon demand in writing by the assignor, the assignee shall, within one year from such demand, reassign the cause of action assigned under this part if the assignor has been or may have been injured by the violation of law for which the cause of action arose and (i) the assignee has not been injured thereby, or (ii) the assignee declines to file a court action for the cause of action. 53. DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE CERTIFICATION: The Contractor certifies under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the Contractor will comply with the requirements of the Drug -Free Workplace Act of 1990 (Government Code Section 8350 et seq.) and will provide a drug-free workplace by taking the following actions: a) Publish a statement notifying employees that unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensation, possession, or use of a controlled substance is prohibited and specifying actions to be taken against employees for violations, as required by Government Code Section 8355(a). b) Establish a Drug -Free Awareness Program as required by Government Code Section 8355(b) to inform employees about all of the following: (1) the dangers of drug abuse in the workplace; (ii) the person's or organization's policy of maintaining a drug-free workplace; (iii) any available counseling, rehabilitation and employee assistance programs; and, (iv) penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug abuse violations. c) Provide, as required by Government Code Section 8355(c), that every employee who works on the proposed or resulting Contract: (i) will receive a copy of the company's drug-free policy statement; and, (ii) will agree to abide by the terms of the company's statement as a condition of employment on the Contract. 54. FOUR -DIGIT DATE COMPLIANCE: Contractor warrants that it will provide only Four -Digit Date Compliant (as defined below) Deliverables and/or services to the State. "Four Digit Date Compliant" Deliverables and services can accurately process, calculate, compare, and sequence date data, including without limitation date data arising out of or relating to leap years and changes in centuries, This warranty and representation is subject to the warranty terms and conditions of this Contract and does not limit the generality of warranty obligations set forth elsewhere herein. 55. SWEATFREE CODE OF CONDUCT: a) Contractor declares under penalty of perjury that no equipment, materials, or supplies furnished to the State pursuant to the Contract have been produced in whole or in part by sweatshop labor, forced labor, convict labor, indentured labor under penal sanction, abusive forms of child labor or exploitation of children in sweatshop labor, or with the benefit of sweatshop labor, forced labor, convict labor, indentured labor under penal sanction, abusive forms of child labor or exploitation of children in sweatshop labor. The Contractor further declares under penalty of perjury that they adhere to the Sweatfree Code of Conduct as set forth on the California Department of Industrial Relations website located at www.dir.ca.gov and Public Contract Code Section 6108, b) The Contractor agrees to cooperate fully in providing reasonable access to its records, documents, agents or employees, or premises if reasonably required by authorized officials of the State, the Department of Industrial Relations, or the Department of Justice to determine the Contractor's compliance with the requirements under paragraph (a). 56. RECYCLED CONTENT REOUIRMENTS: The Contractor shall certify in writing under penalty of perjury, the minimum, if not exact, percentage of post -consumer material (as defined in the Public Contract Code (PCC) Section 12200-12209), in products, materials, goods, or supplies offered or sold to the State that fall under any of the statutory categories regardless of whether the product meets the requirements of Section 12209. The certification shall be provided by the contractor, even if the product or good contains no postconsumer recycled material, and even if the postconsumer content is unknown With respect to printer or duplication cartridges that comply with the requirements of Section 12156(e), the certification required by this subdivision shall specify that the cartridges so comply (PCC 12205 (b)(2)) A state agency contracting officer may waive the certification requirements if the percentage of postconsumer material in the products, materials, goods, or supplies can be verified in a written advertisement, including, but not limited to, a product label, a catalog, or a manufacturer or vendor Internet web site. Contractors are to use, to the maximum extent economically feasible in the performance of the contract work, recycled content products (PCC 12203(d)) 57. CHILD SUPPORT COMPLIANCE ACT: For any Contract in excess of $100,000, the Contractor acknowledges in accordance with PCC Section 7110, that: a) The Contractor recognizes the importance of child and family support obligations and shall fully comply with all applicable State and federal laws relating to child and family support enforcement, including, but not limited to, disclosure of information and compliance with earnings assignment orders, as provided in Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 5200) of Part 5 of Division 9 of the Family Code; and b) The Contractor, to the best of its knowledge is fully complying with the earnings assignment orders of all employees and is providing the names of all new employees to the New Hire Registry maintained by the Califomia Employment Development Department. 58. AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT: The Contractor assures the State that the Contractor complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U S C 12101 et seq.). 59. ELECTRONIC WASTE RECYCLING ACT OF 2003: The Contractor certifies that it complies with the applicable requirements of the Electronic Waste Recycling Act of 2003, Chapter 8 5, Part 3 of Division 30, commencing with Section 42460 of the Public Resources Code. The Contractor shall maintain documentation and provide reasonable access to its records and documents that evidence compliance 60. USE TAX COLLECTION: In accordance with PCC Section 10295.1, the Contractor certifies that it complies with the requirements of Section 7101 of the Revenue and Taxation Code. Contractor further certifies that it will immediately advise the State of any change in its retailer's seller's permit or certification of registration or applicable affiliate's sellers permit or certificate of registration as described in subdivision (a) of PCC Section 10295 1. 61. EXPATRIATE CORPORATIONS: Contractor hereby declares that it is not an expatriate corporation or subsidiary of an expatriate corporation within the meaning of PCC Sections 10286 and 10286.1, and is eligible to contract with the State. 62. DOMESTIC PARTNERS: For contracts over $100,000 executed or amended after January 1, 2007, the contractor certifies that the contractor is in compliance with Public Contract Code Section 10295 3. Page 11 of 12 GSPD-401 IT (REVISED AND EFFECTIVE 11/27/2013) GENERAL PROVISIONS- INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 63. SMALL BUSINESS PARTICIPATION AND DVBE PARTICIPATION REPORTING REQUIREMENTS: a) If for this Contract the Contractor made a commitment to achieve small business participation, then the Contractor must within 60 days of receiving final payment under this Contract (or within such other time period as may be specified elsewhere in this Contract) report to the awarding department the actual percentage of small business participation that was achieved. (Govt. Code § 14841.) b) If for this Contract the Contractor made a commitment to achieve disabled veteran business enterprise (DVBE) participation, then Contractor must within 60 days of receiving final payment under this Contract (or within such other time period as may be specified elsewhere in this Contract) certify in a report to the awarding department: (1) the total amount the prime Contractor received under the Contract; (2) the name and address of the DVBE(s) that participated in the performance of the Contract; (3) the amount each DVBE received from the prime Contractor; (4) that all payments under the Contract have been made to the DVBE; and (5) the actual percentage of DVBE participation that was achieved. A person or entity that knowingly provides false information shall be subject to a civil penalty for each violation. (Mil & Vets Code § 999.5(d); Govt. Code § 14841.) 64. LOSS LEADER: It is unlawful for any person engaged in business within this state to sell or use any article or product as a "loss leader" as defined in Section 17030 of the Business and Professions Code. (PCC 12104.5(b).). Page 12 of 12 EXHIBIT E WSCA-NASPO CONTRACT FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA (MASTER AGREEMENT #3091 FOR COPIERS, PRINTERS AND RELATED DEVICES) AS IMPLEMENTED IN CALIFORNIA THROUGH THE PARTICIPATING ADDENDUM #7-15-70-23. [attach copy of agreement here] PARTICIPATING ADDENDUM WSCA-NASPO COOPERATIVE PURCHASING ORGANIZATION COPIERS, PRINTERS & RELATED DEVICES 14-19 Administered by the State of Nevada (hereinafter "Lead State") WSCA MASTER AGREEMENT Canon U.S.A., Inc Nevada RFP 3091 (hereinafter "Contractor") And Commonwealth of Kentucky (hereinafter "Participating State") MA 758 1500000977 Amendment #1 dated 12/17/15 Page 1 of6 1. $cope: This addendum covers the Copiers, Printers & Related Devices 14-19 lead by the State of Nevada for use by Authorized NON EXECUTIVE BRANCH STATE AGENCIES ONLY and other entities located in the Participating State authorized by that state's statutes to utilize state contracts, which includes local public agencies of the Commonwealth as defined in KRS 45A.345(11). Each authorized using agency must establish its own separate agreement if applicable with the awarded contractor for products and services. Contractor has been awarded devices and services in the following categories: Group A - Convenience Copiers Group B - Production Copiers Group C - Wide Format Copiers Group D - Printers Group F - Scanners 2. Participation: This addendum is for authorized NON EXECUTIVE BRANCH AGENCIES ONLY. Executive Branch State Agencies (as indicated in the following web link http://ogendoor.ky.govlaccountability/gengov/Pages/executive asps) may NOT utilize this addendum and must participate in the Managed Print Contract (MPS), MA 768 1300000391. Executive Branch State Agencies must contact the Commonwealth Office of Technology (COT) regarding the MPS Contract. 3. Participating State Modifications or Additions to WSCA Master Agreement; This addendum is for the full scope of products and services awarded in the WSCA contract between WSCA and the awarded contractor. With respect to 3.7.4 of the Master Agreement, Contractor can provide Customer with specific options to enhance data security besides the 3 -pass overwrite that will be performed by Contractor at no additional charge as required under 3.7.4.3. Some of these options are at an additional cost, including hard drive removal under Section 5.4.6 of the Master Agreement. Customer is responsible for choosing what, if any, options it wants Contractor to provide beyond the included end -of -term 3 -pass overwrite, including whatever erasure standards may be required by applicable law. PARTICIPATING ADDENDUM WSCA-NASPO COOPERATIVE PURCHASING ORGANIZATION COPIERS, PRINTERS & RELATED DEVICES 14-19 Administered by the State of Nevada (hereinafter "Lead State") WSCA MASTER AGREEMENT Canon U.S.A., Inc Nevada RFP 3091 (hereinafter "Contractor") And Commonwealth of Kentucky (hereinafter "Participating State") MA 758 1800000977 Amendment #1 dated 12/17/15 Page 2 of 6 The notification requirements of Section 5.4.7.2 of the Master Agreement, "Special Promotions," shall apply exclusively to Contractor in the event Contractor provides special promotion or pricing as a supplement to the applicable Attachment I Price Schedule. Notwithstanding the warranty provisions set forth in Sections 11.4.1 and 11.4.2 of the Master Agreement, the State and Participating Entities shall instead be entitled to the benefits of the generally available Canon warranty (or, in the case of third party products, the manufacturer's or developer's warranty), as applicable, for the hardware and software, including all warranty remedies. Under Section 11.4.2.3 of the Master Agreement, "Infringement Indemnity," and Section 14.b. of Attachment D to the Master Agreement (WSCA-NASPO Master Agreement Terms and Conditions), "Indemnification -Intellectual Property," Contractor's indemnification obligations for infringement apply exclusively with respect to a claimant's United States Intellectual Property rights and Canon or Oce brand manufactured equipment furnished hereunder. For the avoidance of doubt, Participating State acknowledges that the "work for hire" provision in Section 19 of Appendix D to the Master Agreement, "Pre -Existing Intellectual Property," does not apply to the Equipment and Services furnished under the Agreement. In no event shall Contractor, its Authorized Dealers, or the Participating State, including Participating Entities, be liable under this Participating Addendum for any special, incidental, consequential or indirect damages of any kind, regardless of whether such party knew or should have known of the possibility of such damages, 4. LeaseR Leasing is approved for the authorized using agencies ("Participating Entities"). Leases will be provided to Participating Entities under this Agreement from Canon USA's subsidiary, Canon Financial Services, Inc. ("CFS"), pursuant to the terms and conditions of the lease agreement as set forth as Exhibit A and as modified from time to time ("Least Agreement"). Exccpt as otherwise agreed to by the parties, Participating Entities may sign a Lease Agreement for the lease of only the equipment specified in the Lease Agreement at the time of execution, or Participating Entities may enter into a master Lease Agreement allowing for multiple lease orders from time to time. To initiate a lease, Participating Entities may issue an Order and reference the type of Lease Agreement (FMV, Operational, or Capital Lease) on the Order, and such Order may be issued directly to PARTICIPATING ADDENDUM WSCA-NASPO COOPERATIVE PURCHASING ORGANIZATION COPIERS, PRINTERS & RELATED DEVICES 14-19 Administered by the State of Nevada (hereinafter "Lead State") WSCA MASTER AGREEMENT Canon U.S.A., Inc Nevada RFP 3091 (hereinafter "Contractor") And Commonwealth of Kentucky (hereinafter "Participating State") MA 768 1500000977 Amendment #1 dated 12/17/15 Page 3of6 CFS or may be issued to the Authorized Dealer in which case the Authorized Dealer will assign the Order to CFS; or CFS may require the Participating Entities to sign a Lease Agreement. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Participating Addendum, in the event of a conflict between an executed Lease Agreement and this Agreement, the terms of the Lease Agreement will supersede and control. Each Lease Agreement and each Order for leasing issued prior to the termination of this Participating Addendum shall survive the termination of this Participating Addendum for any reason whatsoever, and each Order to the extent for leasing shall be non - cancellable except to the extent if at all as provided in the Lease Agreement. S. Primary Contacts: The primary contact individuals for this Participating Addendum are as follows (or their named successors): Contractor Name Canon USA, Mike Hurley, Supervisor, Contract Admin Address 1 Canon Park, Melville, NY 11747 Telephone 631-330-3613 Fax 631-330-5459 E-mail atiltirleyacuga.carton.com Prtijrpatincr Enti Name Stephanie R. Williams Address 702 Capitol Avenue, Room 096 Frankfort, KY 40601 Telephone (602) 564-8621 Fax (802) 564-6013 Stephanier.Williams a�7ky.gov E-mail 6. Authorized Dealers; All Canon USA authorized dealers in the State of Kentucky, as shown on the dedicated Canon USA (cooperative contract) website ("Authorized Dealers"), are approved to accept orders from Participating Entities for the sale of Goods and the performance of Services under the Master Agreement and this Participating Addendum and, with respect to all orders accepted by an Authorized Dealer, shall have all of the rights and obligations of "Contractor" under the Master Agreement and this Participating Addendum, including sole responsibility for fulfilling such orders. In the event of any disputes between an Authorized Dealer and a Purchaser, Canon USA PARTICIPATING ADDENDUM WSCA-NASPO COOPERATIVE PURCHASING ORGANIZATION COPIERS, PRINTERS & RELATED DEVICES 14-19 Administered by the State of Nevada (hereinafter "Lead State") WSCA MASTER AGREEMENT Canon U.S.A., Inc Nevada RFP 3091 (hereinafter "Contractor") And Commonwealth of Kentucky (hereinafter "Participating State") MA 758 1500000977 Amendment #1 dated 12/17/15 Page4of6 shall investigate, shall consult with Participating State and the Purchasing Entity as appropriate, and shall use commercially reasonable efforts to resolve the dispute. 7. Purchase Order Instructions: All orders should contain the following (1) Mandatory Language "PO is subject to WSCA-NASPO Contract # 3091 and Commonwealth of Kentucky Master Agreement # MA 758 1800000977 (2) Your Name, Address, Contact, & Phone -Number (3) Purchase order amount. Please channel your PO through one of our authorized resellers so they can arrange for proper ordering and installation of your unit. 8. Price Agreement Number: All purchase orders issued by purchasing entities within the jurisdiction of this participating addendum shall include the Participating State contract number: MA 758 1500000977 and the Lead State price agreement number: 3091. 9. Service Level Agreements ("SLAs"): The SLAs attached as Exhibit B to this Participating Addendum shall apply to Services provided by the Authorized Dealers under this Addendum. 10. Individual Customer: Each authorized Non Executive Branch State agency and political subdivision, as a Participating Entity, that purchases products/services will be treated as if they were Individual Customers. Except to the extent modified by a Participating Addendum, each authorized Non Executive Branch State agency and political subdivision will be responsible to follow the terms and conditions of the WSCA Master Agreement; and they will have the same rights and responsibilities for their purchases as the Lead State has in the WSCA Master Agreement. Each authorized Non Executive Branch State agency and political subdivision will be responsible for their own charges, fees, and liabilities. Each authorized Non Executive Branch State agency and political subdivision will have the same rights to any indemnity or to recover any costs allowed in the contract for their purchases. The Contractor will apply the charges to each Participating Entity individually. This Participating Addendum and the WSCA Master Agreement number 3091 (administered by the State of Nevada) together with its exhibits, set forth the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter of all previous PARTICIPATING ADDENDUM WSCA-NASPO COOPERATIVE PURCHASING ORGANIZATION COPIERS, PRINTERS & RELATED DEVICES 14-19 Administered by the State of Nevada (hereinafter "Lead State") WSCA MASTER AGREEMENT Canon U.S.A., Inc Nevada RFP 3091 (hereinafter "Contractor") And Commonwealth of Kentucky (hereinafter "Participating State") MA 758 1500000977 Amendment #1 dated 12/17/15 Page 5 of b communications, representations or agreements, whether oral or written, with respect to the subject matter hereof. Terms and conditions inconsistent with, contrary or in addition to the terms and conditions of this Addendum and the WSCA Master Agreement, together with its exhibits, shall not be added to or incorporated into this Addendum or the WSCA Master Agreement and its exhibits, by any subsequent purchase order or otherwise, and any such attempts to add or incorporate such terms and conditions are hereby rejected. The terms and conditions of this Addendum and the WSCA Master Agreement and its exhibits shall prevail and govern in the case of any such inconsistent or additional terms within the Participating State. 11. Governing Law This Participating Addendum shall be govemed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the Commonwealth of Kentucky and the using agency. Venue shall be the Commonwealth of Kentucky, Franklin County in accordance with KRS 4A7-245. "ISA. http://finance.ky.gov/services/eprocurement/Pages/LawsPrefRegsPolicies.aspx IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Addendum as of the date of execution by both parties below. Participating State: Commonwealth of Kentucky Comoro . wealth Office of Technology By Name: Contractor: Canon U.S.A., Inc. By: Te D. Stephens Title: Executive Director Date: *1 Name: Junic i o: take Title: Senior Vice President & G BISG Date: Dcr.srrrot.t r7,2ot5 [Additional signatures as required by Participating State] Participating State: PARTICIPATING ADDENDUM WSCA-NASPO COOPERATIVE PURCHASING ORGANIZATION COPIERS, PRINTERS & RELATED DEVICES 14-19 Administered by the State of Nevada (hereinafter "Lead State") WSCA MASTER AGREEMENT Canon U.S.A., Inc Nevada RFP 3091 (hereinafter "Contractor") And Commonwealth of Kentucky (hereinafter "Participating State") MA 758 1500000977 Amendment #1 dated 12/17/18 Page 6 of 6 Commonwealth of Kentucky Office of Procurement Services By: ('2�a_ R aJ Name•,,, Jen r. bra, ha. ilk Ti Date: et.eu,ci7V.c-liV,et 1-y 1 49 If you have questions about this Participating Addendum or the participation process, please contact: WSCA-NASPO COOPERATIVE PURCHASING ORGANIZATION Name Paul Stembler, Cooperative Development Coordinator Telephone 661-206-3858 E-mail paul.stemblerja waca-na po.ow [Frilly executed PDF copy of tlhis document should be entailed to Pfr wsca-naspo.orq to support documentation of participation and posting in appropriate data bases] Exhibit A STATE OF NEVADA SERVICE LEVEL AGREEMENT (SLA) 1. Customer Level SLA 1.1 Purpose The purpose of this addendum is to define service levels; penalties for the performance of the service levels; as well as provide the Customer with a defined replacement process for equipment performing below expectations. This SLA does not implicate or involve lease related invoicing; it involves equipment performance and maintenance issues. 1.2 Customer Service Level Agreement Contractor agrees to maintain the following service levels defined below as targets: Performance Criteria Target Level Average Uptime 96% or Better Average On -Site Response Time 4 Hours or Less* First Time Fix EO% of all service calls or better These service levels will be measurcd on a quarterly basis between Contractor and Customer. *imageClass Printer Models (Group D) and DR Scanner Models (Group F) are serviced via exchange program. Service for these products is not on site therefore, 4 hour response time does not apply. Canon agrees to perform its Services in a professional manner, consistent with Canon's applicable industry product standards. Canon's warranty is as set forth in the WSCA-NASPO MSA, Contract #3091 and Canon's response to the solicitation. 1.3 Calculation of Service Level Points Upon written request of the Customer, the Contractor will produce reporting to he measured against the Service Level Agreement and points will be assigned according to the following chart for the previous quarter. These points will be added to produce a total Service Level score. This score will be used to determine the subsequent penalty according to the following schedule where the penalty can be up to 4% of the previous quarter's service and supplies billing only (expressed as a negative %). Penalty will not apply to lease payments. Page 1 of 4 Canon USA, Inc. 1.4 Penalty The penalty shall be awarded to the Customer as a credit on the following period's service and supplies invoice. Target Level Below Target 1 Below Target 2 Below Target 3 Below Target 4 Average Uptime 98% or Higher 97.9% - 96% 95.9% - 94% 94.9% - 94% 93.9% or lower Possible Points 4 3 2 2 0 All Average On -Site Response Time (in Hours) 4 or Less 4.1 — 5 5.1 - 6 6.1 - 7 7.1 or more Possible Points 4 3 2 2 0 First Time Fix 80% or Higher 79,9% - 70% 69.9% - 60% 59.9% - 50% Less than 50% Possible Points 4 3 2 2 0 1.4 Penalty The penalty shall be awarded to the Customer as a credit on the following period's service and supplies invoice. 1.5 Equipment Performance Contractor guarantees each machine specified within any maintenance agreement will perform to either a) the monthly copies between service calls as measured by machine on a quarterly basis by group and segment listed below and/or b) the monthly uptime as measured by machine on a quarterly basis by segment listed below. Group Target Level Below Target 1 Below Target 2 Below Target 3 Below Target 4 Total Score 12-10 9-7 6-4 3-1 0 Penalty as a percentage of quarterly service and supplies billings 0% -2.5% -3,0% -3.5% -4.0% 1.5 Equipment Performance Contractor guarantees each machine specified within any maintenance agreement will perform to either a) the monthly copies between service calls as measured by machine on a quarterly basis by group and segment listed below and/or b) the monthly uptime as measured by machine on a quarterly basis by segment listed below. Group Devices Segments Quarterly Uptime A Copiers Black & White All 95% B Copiers Color All 95% C Wide Format Devices All 95% D Printers (Color and Black &White) All 95% F Scanners All 95% Page 2 of 4 Canon USA, Inc. If any unit fails to maintain this level of performance between calls and or the monthly uptime, excluding service calls caused by operator error that system will be subject to replacement at the Customers discretion on a like -for -like basis with then current technology. Prior to installing a substitute product, Contractor will be allowed 90 days to remedy any quality or reliability issues. A designated factory authorized technician must certify each unit's ability to produce acceptable impressions with acceptable copies between calls or uptime. The guarantee will remain in effect for the term of the contract or up to five (5) years from the date of purchase/lease, provided the equipment has not been subjected to abuse or neglect and has been continuously covered by a Maintenance Contract. This replacement policy will remain in effect for the term of the contract and is subject to the Customer remaining current with supplier's payment requirements. 1.6 Additional Contractor Guarantees 1.6.1 Training — On-going training as requested by the Customer to be performed within two (2) weeks of requested date for on-site training and two (2) hours for phone/technical support. A penalty of $50 per incident that does not meet the turnaround time specified to be credited on the next service bill. 1.6.2 Loaner Unit/Backup Production — If any unit is inoperable due to equipment malfunction for a period in excess of 72 hours, Contractor shall provide the Customer with either: i) A loaner unit of similar speed and capabilities until such time as the unit(s) covered by this agreement are operable, or ii) Provide the Customer with off-site manned production capabilities to accomplish the work of the unit that is inoperable at the sole cost of the Contractor. Such costs shall be limited to cost of production (service and supplies), equipment, labor, power, transportation of jobs to and from the off-site production facility and facilities. 1.6.3 Invoicing — Contractor shall maintain timely, accurate invoicing, less service run impressions, as defined below. The assigned copy machine operators, back- up personnel, and office personnel shall respond in a timely manner to the Contractor's e-mails, facsimiles, and phone calls in providing the readings. Receiving meters from Customer is a necessary step in the process of generating a complete and accurate invoice. Invoices that are generated without receiving the proper meter read information, due to the Customer's failure to provide such meter by the last day of the month, are not considered inaccurate. Failure on the Contractor's part to maintain the Service levels as defined in the table below shall result in a $50.00 per instance credit on the following invoice provided Customer has given written notice to Contractor of any such alleged invoicing Page 3 of 4 Canon USA, Inc. problem and Contractor has been allowed a 30 day cure period idler such notice to address any such issue. Measurable Service Level Timely Invoicing Invoices will be submitted no later than the 25m of the month immediately following the close of a billing period Accurate Invoicing Invoices do not require any credits for miss -billing Service Impressions Contractor will credit all service run impressions within the same billing cycle 2. Reporting and Billing 2.1 Timely Reporting - Contractor shall produce reporting for the State within 30 days of the closing of the reporting period. Failure to do so may result in a penalty of $5.00 per work day beyond the 30 day period. 2.2 Accuracy of Reporting - The State may request at any point proof of the reporting accuracy through the data set supporting the reporting. If the State has reason to believe that multiple and systemic reporting errors exist, that cannot be corrected to the State's satisfaction; the State may require an audit by a third party. If errors are found, the Contractor must reimburse the State for the cost of the auditor. 2.3 Accuracy of Billing - The State may request at any point proof of the billing accuracy through the data set supporting the billing. if the State has reason to believe that multiple and systemic billing errors exist, that cannot be corrected to the State's satisfaction; the State may require an audit by a third party. If errors are found, the Contractor must reimburse the State for the cost ofthe auditor as well as correcting any billing errors. 2.4 Penalties - All penalties under this, section two (2) of the Service Level Agreement, shall be payable to the State. IN wrrNr: s Rfi(ll:, the parties hereto have caused this Contract to be signed and intend to be legally bound thereby. Contractor Sign Icy Shannon berry Sr. VP & GM BISG Date 'title Esj rl 14--1 r_ t [+ssislunt Chief Procurement Of7iccr, Purchasing Division Date Title Page 4 of 4 Canon USA, Inc. Item No. 8 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: March 27, 2018 SUBJECT: Approve an Agreement with Raceway Ford, Inc. for the Purchase of a Ford F-550XL Super Duty Truck PREPARED BY: Julie Tarrant, Senior Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve an Agreement with Raceway Ford, Inc., in the amount of $120,910.43, for the purchase of a Ford F-550XL Super Duty Chassis Cab and Utility Bed with Equipment. BACKGROUND: On September 27, 2017, the Public Works Department electronically posted on the City of Temecula' on-line bidding service, Planet Bids, a Request for Quote (RFQ), for the purchase of a Ford 550 F550 XL Super Duty Chassis Cab and Utility Bed with Equipment, RFQ No. 034. We received two responsive bids by the submission deadline of October 12, 2017. The solicitation included the City's local preference program; however, it did not affect the award of this purchase. Final bid results were as follows; 1. Raceway Ford, Riverside $120,910.43 2. Tom's Truck Center, Santa Fe Springs $123,021.35 Pursuant to the City's purchasing policy, staff recommends authorization of the purchase of a Ford 550 XL Super Duty Chassis Cab and Utliity Bed with Equipment from Raceway Ford, Riverside. FISCAL IMPACT: The purchase of the Ford F-550 XL Super Duty Truck is included, and adequate funds are available in the Fiscal Year 2017-18 Annual Operating Budget, Capital Outlay Vehicle and Equipment Fund. ATTACHMENTS: Agreement AGREEMENT FOR PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT BETWEEN CITY OF TEMECULA AND RACEWAY FORD, INC. FORD F-550 XL SUPER DUTY CHASSIS CAB AND UTILITY BED WITH EQUIPMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and effective as of March 27, 2018, between the City of Temecula , a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and Raceway Ford, Inc., a Corporation, (hereinafter referred to as "Vendor"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. TERM This Agreement shall commence on March 27, 2018, and shall remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than December 31, 2018, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. 2. PURCHASE AND SALE OF EQUIPMENT On and subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement and the Agreement Documents, Vendor agrees to sell and deliver to City a Ford F-550 XL Super Duty Chassis Cab and Utility Bed with Equipment, as more particularly described in Exhibit A, Description of Equipment / Scope of Work (hereafter "Equipment"), attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. 3. PURCHASE PRICE The Purchase Price which City agrees to pay to Vendor for the Equipment is One hundred and twenty thousand, nine hundred and ten dollars and forty three cents. ($120,910.43). The Purchase Price is final and shall be paid by City to Vendor in accordance with the following schedule: within thirty (30) days of receipt of non -disputed invoice. 4. REPRESENTATION AND WARRANTIES OF VENDOR Vendor makes the following representations and warranties to City: a. Authority and Consents. Vendor has the right, power, legal capacity and authority to enter into and perform its obligations under this Agreement. No approvals or consents of any persons are necessary in connection with Vendor's execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement, except for such as have been obtained on or prior to the date hereof. The execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement by Vendor have been duly authorized by all necessary action on the part of Vendor and constitute the legal, valid and binding obligations of Vendor, enforceable against Vendor in accordance with their respective terms. b. Title, License and Operating Condition. Vendor has good and marketable title to all of the Equipment. All of the Equipment is free and clear of any restrictions on or conditions to transfer or assignment, and City will acquire absolute title to all of the Equipment free and clear of mortgages, liens, pledges, charges, encumbrances, equities, claims, covenants, conditions and restrictions except for such as may be created or granted by City. All of the Equipment is in good operating condition, is free of any defects, and is in conformity with the specifications, descriptions, representations and warranties set forth in the Agreement 12/28/2017 Documents. Vendor is aware that City is purchasing the Equipment for use as a Public Works stenciling vehicle and that City is relying on the warranties of the Vendor that the Equipment is fit for this purpose and the ordinary purposes for which the Equipment is normally used. c. Full Disclosure. None of the representations and warranties made by Vendor in this Agreement contains or will contain any untrue statements of a material fact, or omits to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading. 5. TIME OF DELIVERY The date and time of delivery of the Equipment shall be on or before 245 days of receipt of purchase order. 6. PLACE OF DELIVERY The Equipment shall be delivered to the following location: City of Temecula - Public Works Department Field Operations Center 43230 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 TITLE AND RISK OF LOSS Title to and the risk of loss, damage and destruction of the Equipment shall remain with the Vendor until after inspection and acceptance of the Equipment by City. 7. INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE City shall inspect the Equipment at the time and place of delivery. Such Inspection may include reasonable tests and use of the Equipment by City. If, in the determination of City, the Equipment fails to conform to the Agreement IN ANY MANNER OR RESPECT, City shall so notify Vendor within ten (10) days of delivery of the Equipment to City. Failing such notice, the Equipment shall be deemed accepted by City as of the date of receipt. 8. REJECTION In the event of such notice of non -conformity by City pursuant to the section entitled "Acceptance" above, City may, at its option, (1) reject the whole of the Equipment, (2) accept the whole of the Equipment, or (3) accept any commercial unit or units of the Equipment and reject the remainder. The exercise of any of the above options shall be "without prejudice" and with full reservation of any rights and remedies of City attendant upon a breach. In the event of such notice and election by City, City agrees to comply with all reasonable instructions of Vendor and, in the event that expenses are incurred by City in following such instructions, Vendor shall indemnify City in full for such expenses. 9. NO REPLACEMENTS OF CURE This Agreement calls for strict compliance. Vendor expressly agrees that both the Software tendered and the tender itself will conform fully to the terms and conditions of the Agreement on the original tender. In the event of rejection by City of the whole of the Software 2 12/28/2017 or any part thereof pursuant to the section entitled "Rejection" above, City may, but is not required to, accept any substitute performance from Vendor or engage in subsequent efforts to affect a cure of the original tender by Vendor. 10. MAINTENANCE Vendor shall maintain the Equipment in accordance with the terms of the maintenance schedule attached hereto as Exhibit B, and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full. In performing the maintenance of the Equipment, Vendor shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of Vendor hereunder In meeting its maintenance obligations under this Agreement. 11. INDEMNIFICATION Vendor agrees to defend, indemnify, protect, and hold harmless, the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, and its officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers, from and against any and all claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, actions, liability or damages of any kind and nature which the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, its officers, agents, employees, and volunteers may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of Vendor's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions arising out of or In any way related to the Work or the Vendor's performance or non-performance of this Agreement, excepting only liability out of the sole negligence of the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency. 12. AGREEMENT DOCUMENTS a. This Agreement includes the following documents, which are by this reference incorporated herein and made a part hereof: • Description of Equipment / Scope of Work (from the Request for Quote (RFQ), attached hereto as Exhibit A • Response/Quotation to the Request for Quote (RFQ), attached hereto as Exhibit B b. In the event any term or condition of the Agreement Documents conflicts with or is contradictory to any term or condition of the Agreement, the terms and conditions of this Agreement are controlling. c. In the event of a conflict in terms between this Agreement, the Request for Quote (RFQ) and/or the Vendor's response to the RFQ, this Agreement shall prevail over the RFQ and the Vendor's response to the RFQ. 13. REMEDIES The remedies and rights conferred on the City by this Agreement are in addition to and cumulative with all other remedies and rights accorded the City under law or equity. 14. SURVIVAL OF RERESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES 3 1 2/2 812 01 7 All representations, warranties, covenants and agreements of the parties contained in this Agreement shall survive the execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement. 15. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES The Vendor shall keep itself informed of State and Federal laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Vendor shall at all times observe and comply with all such laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Vendor to comply with this section. 16. ASSIGNMENT The Vendor shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of the City. This Agreement shall be binding on, and shall inure to the benefit of, the parties to it and their respective heirs, legal representatives, successors and assigns. Upon termination of the Agreement, Vendor's sole compensation shall be payment for actual equipment received. 17. SEVERABILITY If any provision of this Agreement is held invalid or unenforceable by any court of final jurisdiction, it is the intent of the parties that all other provisions of this Agreement be construed to remain fully valid, enforceable, and binding on the parties. 18. PROHIBITED INTEREST No officer, or employee of the City of Temecula that has participated in the development of this agreement or its approval shall have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, the proceeds thereof, the Vendor, or Vendor's sub -Contractors for this project, during hislher tenure or for one year thereafter. The Vendor hereby warrants and represents to the City that no officer or employee of the City of Temecula that has participated in the development of this agreement or its approval has any interest, whether contractual, non -contractual, financial or otherwise, in this transaction, the proceeds thereof or in the business of the Vendor or Vendor's sub -Contractors on this project. Vendor further agrees to notify the City in the event any such interest is discovered whether or not such interest is prohibited by law or this Agreement. 19. ENTIRE AGREEMENT; MODIFICATION; WAIVER This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties pertaining to the subject matter hereof and thereof and supersedes all prior and contemporaneous agreements, representations and understandings of the parties, whether oral or written. No supplement, modification or amendment of this Agreement or the Agreement Documents shall be binding unless executed in writing by all the parties. No waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement or the Agreement Documents shall be deemed, or shall constitute, a waiver of any other provision, whether or not similar, nor shall any waiver constitute a continuing waiver. No waiver shall be binding unless executed in writing by the party making the waiver. 20. NOTICES 4 12/28/2017 Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (i) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice. Notice shall be effective upon delivery to the addresses specified below or on the third business day following deposit with the document delivery service or United States Mail as provided above. Mailing Address: To Consultant: 21. EFFECTS OF HEADINGS City of Temecula Attn: City Manager 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 Raceway Ford, Inc. Attn: Mike Ladner 5900 Sycamore Canyon Blvd. Riverside, CA 92507 The subject headings of the sections and subsections of this Agreement are included for convenience only and shall not affect or be considered in the construction or interpretation of any of its provisions. 22. GOVERNING LAW This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with, and governed by, the laws of the State of California as applied to contracts that are executed and performed entirely in California. The City and Vendor understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties, and liabilities of the parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event such litigation is filed by one party against the other to enforce its rights under this Agreement, the prevailing party, as determined by the court's judgment, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and litigation expenses for the relief granted. 23. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the Vendor warrants and represents that he or she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Vendor and has the authority to bind the Vendor to the performance of its obligation hereunder. The City Manager is authorized to enter into an amendment on behalf of the City to make the following non -substantive modifications to the agreement: (a) name changes; (b) extension of time; (c) non -monetary changes in scope of work; (d) agreement termination. 5 12/28/2017 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF TEMECULA By: Matt Rahn, Mayor ATTEST: RACEWAY FORD, INC. (Two Signatures of corporate officers required unless corporate documents authorize only one person to sign the agreement on behalf of the corporation.) By: By: By: Randi Johl, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: am amberlin, Vice President Sales ark ing Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney VENDOR i e Lad j ; leet Manager Raceway Ford, Inc. Mike Ladner 5900 Sycamore Canyon Blvd., Riverside CA 92507 951-317-2101 mladner@earthlink.net 6 12/28/2017 PM Initials: Date: EXHIBIT A DESCRIPTION OF EQUIPMENT 7 12/28/2017 EXHIBIT A SPECIFICATIONS LIST NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION SpNCLUD DON (YES/NO) Gross Vehicle Weight Rating (GVWR) Minimum. 19,000 lbs. 2 Payload Capacity 12,666 lbs. 3 Engine V-10 Gasoline powered meeting all current regulations Heavy Duty Cooling 175 APM alternator (minimum) 4. Cab Regular Cab Conventional Steel Electric Horn Windshield - Laminated Glass All Tinted Mirrors - Dual Rear View Windshield Wipers — Intermitted Variable Speed Mirror 12" day/night Sun Visors Vent Windows Seats — High Back with 2 Head Restraints Seats — Vinyl, Beige or Gray Padded rubber floor mats Left and Right Arm Rests Instrument Gauge Switch Warning Devices Direct Read Speedometer Tachometer Oil Pressure Water Temperature Voltmeter and Hour Meter Back up Alarm Factory Air Conditioner Airbag - Driver Side Only 8 NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION SPINCLU� DON (YES/NO) 5. Trim / Drivelines F-550 XL -4X2 40/20/40 Split Front Seat Steel HD Vinyl 6. Transmission TorqShift 5 -Speed Automatic Transmission Oil Cooler Off Radiator 7 Tires and Wheels Reated to maximum GVWR 6 Steel Belted Radials (all season) Minimum 10 -Hole Disc 6.0 Steel Wheels 8. Chassis F-550 drw 4X2 Wheelbase 189" (approximate) Cab to Axle 84" Front Bumper -Full Width 2 Tow Hooks Mounted to Frame Front Axle -5,000 lbs. Heavy -Duty Gas Shocks 1.25" Stabilizer Bar Rear Axle (11,000 lbs. minimum) Frame -36,000 PSI Steel Top of Cab to Ground - 80.7" Top of Frame to Ground - 33.4" Axle Clearance - 8.4" Front Track - 74.8" Rear Tire - outside width 93.9" Overall Length - 250.5" Max. GVWR 19,500 (lbs.) Max. Payload 12,666 (lbs.) 9. Color Oxford White 10 Packages High -Capacity Trailer Package Specifications List continued on next page 9 NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION CIFICA SP INCLUDED (YES/NO) 11 Interior AM/FM Stereo with Two Speakers Digital Clock Manual Climate Controls Auto Door Locks Black Vinyl Flooring Manual Day/Night Rearview Mirror Manual Tilt/Telescoping Steering Column Black Urethane with Three Button Message Center Control Steering Wheel Visors with Passenger Mirror Rear Window - Fixed Power Windows 12. Factor/Dealer Warranties Furnish with Vehicle Upon Delivery 13. Owner's Manual Furnish with Vehicle Upon Delivery 14. Registration (Exempt) Dealer to Process all necessary DMV Registration Papers (No Charge for Exempt Registration) 15. Fuel Tank 40 US Gallon 16. Fuel Gasoline Standard 17. Keys 5 Sets of Vehicle Keys, with Keyless Entry 18. Brakes ABS Full Power Assisted 4-Wheel Disc Brakes Parking Brake on real, foot operated hand release Specifications List continued on next page 10 NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION SPECIFICATION ON D (YES/NO) 19. Roadline Model TPMP (Service Body) 12 GPM Hydraulic Pump One Complete Airless Paint System Stencil Rack Removable Gun Holster Below Deck Tool Box Traffic Cone Storage 30 -Gallon Headboard Hydraulic Reservoir Paint Well for Seven 5 -Gallon Containers Glass Sphere System Hydraulic -Driven Compressor Arrow Board Rotating Lights Work Light for Night Time Operation Multiple Hydraulic -Driven Paint Systems Electric Clutch 20 Service Body Body shall be steel construction and measure a minimum of 135" long by 95" wide Frame shall consist of box" construction Deck to be 1/8" diamond plate sloped sufficiently to prevent standing liquids Headboard to extend 20" above deck Frame to incorporate 2"x2" x 3'16" tubing cross member at 16" O.C. Side skirts of 12 -gauge steel Metal skirts that are not reinforced full length will not be accepted A tool box under the left side (street side) will be approximately nine cubic feet Toolbox doors must be double wall doors with synthetic weather strip seals Latches to be spring loaded, striker plate with "T" handles Doors to be bottom hinged on piano type hinge Service access doors to provide ease of access to hose reel and tool box compartments The minimum door size is 30" x 18" Access doors smaller than these minimums will not be accepted Top access door to the hose reel compartment there shall be a cut out for each spray gun allowing the gun to be locked in the hose reel compartment without disconnecting the gun from the paint hose Specifications List continued on next page I NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION SPECIFICATION INCLUDED (YES/NO) 21 Paint Storage (Service Body) Seven 1" steel rings (to prevent 5 gallons paint cans from shifting) to be mounted on a removable tray with side handles Paint storage well to be drilled for drainage Paint storage tray to be secured with 2 "T" handle bolts for easy removal 22. Gun Solvent Bath (Service Body) Dual recessed #" (min) diameter paint gun solvent bath holsters to be included in the rear panel Holsters must be removable for easy cleaning 23. Hydraulic Reservoir (Service Body) The hydraulic reservoir is to have a 30 -gallon capacity It shall be an integral part of bogy headboard It shall be mounted above the piston pump to prevent positive head Reservoir shall have incorporated into it a vent, oil filter plug, oil drain plug, and oil level sight gauge Bolt on hydraulic reservoir tanks will not be accepted 24. Hydraulic System (Service Body) A minimum 12.0 GPM at 1000RPM hydraulic gear pump with electric clutch is to be provided The pump to be engine mounted and "V" belt driven from the crankshaft pulley Engine speed to be controlled by a chassis manufactures installed electronic throttle control There shall be a 10 -micron return line spin on oil filter One1000-PSI maximum adjustable pressure regulator with gauge (0- 2000 PSI) and one 0-2000 PSI gauge for each pump to be furnished Cab mounted key switch with indicator light plus rear mounted waterproof on/off safety switch is to be included All hoses, piping, and fittings are to be SAE hydraulic rated 25 Body Lights Combination stop/turn lights, clearance lights, and side marker lights to be furnished All lights and reflectors to conform to Federal Motor Vehicle safety standard 108 made waterproof Rear lights to be recessed in body Two seal beam lights will be mounted on the truck - one will illuminate the paint well area, the other the tailgate work area A toggle switch will be located in the cab to turn these lights on and off Specifications List continued on next page 12 NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION gPNCLUD DON (YES/NO) 26 Stencil Rack (Service Body) A stencil rack constructed of 1" square steel tubing to accommodate 20 stencils stacked on edge to a height of 36" will be provided Each space will be 1 3/. " in width Four additional spaces open at the top will be included in the rack A stencil deck roller and stop will be incorporated into the rack The rack shall be attached to the deck by a minimum of 4 rust proof bolts and nuts 27. Bumper (Service Body) A real bumper shall extend across the full width of the vehicle and shall protrude a minimum of 9" The rear bumper shall be constructed of diamond plate steel and painted the color of the vehicle 28 Paint Spray System (Service Body) Two (2) SPEEFLO 989-002 Hydraulic Airless Paint Spray Systems to be furnished (no other brand of pump will be accepted) Each system to include: Airless pump with hard chrome over steel lowers, suction hose tube for 5 gallon paint pail, hydraulic connection hose, high pressure needle valve, 50 mesh paint filter and manifold, high-pressure (3300PS1) connection hose All hoses, fittings, valves, and connections shall be pressure tested to 3300 PSI Pump to be mounted on curbside of headboard 29. Hose Reel and Gun (Service Body) Two (2) spring rewind hose reels with 50' each of 1/, " high pressure (3000PSI) static grounded hose, hose ball stops, and 3' whip and hose to be furnished Graco Contractor Guns with 12" gun extensions and Zip Tip systems included with each system Fluid hose reels to be mounted on curbside Dual hose roller assemblies mounted in the rear body panel Drain holes to be provided for all cabinet spaces 30 Arrowboard (Service Body) A 36" x 72" Trifunction, 25 light arrowboard with a cab mounted remote control is to be provided The arrowboard must come with an electric lift Arrowboard to be mounted above headboard so as to be clearly visible 31 Paint (Service Body) Frame and stencil rack to be painted black Balance of truck to be painted with one prime coat and one finished coat of manufactures standard white All parts to be painted shall be thoroughly cleaned of all weld splatter, slag, scale, and other foreign matter prior to painting The unit to be undercoated throughout 13 EXHIBIT B PAYMENT RATES AND SCHEDULE The Purchase Price which City agrees to pay to Vendor for the Equipment is One hundred and twenty thousand, nine hundred and ten dollars and forty three cents. ($120,910.43). The Purchase Price is final and shall be paid by City to Vendor in accordance with the following schedule: within thirty (30) days of receipt of non -disputed invoice. 14 NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION SPECIFICATION INCLUDED (YES/NO) 1 Gross Vehicle Weight Rating (GVWR) Minimum. 19,000 lbs. v i 2 Payload Capacity 12,666 lbs. f S r 3 Engine V-10 Gasoline powered meeting all current regulations Heavy Duty Cooling 175 APM alternator (minimum) \frz-S• 4. Cab Regular CabLl Conventional Steel Electric Horn Windshield - Laminated Glass All Tinted Mirrors - Dual Rear View Windshield Wipers — Intermitted Variable Speed Mirror 12" day/night Sun Visors Vent Windows Seats — High Back with 2 Head Restraints Seats — Vinyl, Beige or Gray lS Padded rubber floor mats Left and Right Arm Rests Instrument Gauge Switch Warning Devices Direct Read Speedometer Tachometer Oil Pressure Water Temperature Voltmeter and Hour Meter Back up Alarm Factory Air Conditioner Airbag - Driver Side Only 15 NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION SPECIFICATION INCLUDED (YES/NO) 5 Trim / Drivelines F-550 XL -4X2 40/20/40 Split Front Seat Steel HD Vinyl ` -1 6 Transmission TorqShift 5 -Speed Automatic Transmission Oil Cooler Off Radiator S;,,, S r.,..,, p_IN-,,,..63.c_ 11 Ilt-- 7 Tires and Wheels Reated to maximum GVWR 6 Steel Belted Radials (all season) Minimum 10 -Hole Disc 6.0 Steel Wheels '1-1� 8. Chassis F-550 drw 4X2 Wheelbase 189" (approximate) Cab to Axle 84" Front Bumper -Full Width 2 Tow Hooks Mounted to Frame Front Axle -5,000 lbs. Heavy -Duty Gas Shocks 1.25" Stabilizer Bar Rear Axle (11,000 lbs. minimum) Frame -36,000 PSI Steel Top of Cab to Ground - 80.7" Top of Frame to Ground - 33.4" Axle Clearance - 8.4" Front Track - 74.8" Rear Tire - outside width 93.9" Overall Length - 250.5" Max. GVWR 19,500 (lbs.) Max. Payload 12,666 (lbs.) 9. Color Oxford White Lt` - t`10. 10. Packages High -Capacity Trailer Package 1 4, Specifications List continued on next page 16 NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION SPECIFICATION INCLUDED (YES/NO) 11 Interior AM/FM Stereo with Two Speakers Digital Clock Manual Climate Controls Auto Door Locks Black Vinyl Flooring Manual Day/Night Rearview Mirror Manual Tilt/Telescoping Steering Column Black Urethane with Three Button Message Center Control Steering Wheel Visors with Passenger Mirror Rear Window - Fixed Power Windows 12 Factor/Dealer Warranties Furnish with Vehicle Upon Delivery Li 1--5 13. Owner's Manual Furnish with Vehicle Upon Delivery "7,--1 14. Registration (Exempt) Dealer to Process all necessary DMV Registration Papers (No Charge for Exempt Registration) ,4 15. Fuel Tank 40 US Gallon Lh 16. Fuel Gasoline Standard `1^...f 17 Keys 5 Sets of Vehicle Keys, with Keyless Entry '7 4-f 18. Brakes ABS Full Power Assisted 4-Wheel Disc Brakes Parking Brake on real, foot operated hand release c..) Specifications List continued on next page 17 NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION SPECIFICATION INCLUDED (YES/NO) 19. Roadline Model TPMP (Service Body) 12 GPM Hydraulic Pump One Complete Airless Paint System Stencil Rack Removable Gun Holster Below Deck Tool Box Traffic Cone Storage 30 -Gallon Headboard Hydraulic Reservoir Paint Well for Seven 5 -Gallon Containers Glass Sphere System Hydraulic -Driven Compressor Arrow Board Rotating Lights Work Light for Night Time Operation Multiple Hydraulic -Driven Paint Systems Electric Clutch y `�s 20. Service Body Body shall be steel construction and measure a minimum of 135" long by 95" wide Frame shall consist of "box" construction Deck to be 1/8" diamond plate sloped sufficiently to prevent standing liquids Headboard to extend 20" above deck Frame to incorporate 2"x2" x 3'16" tubing cross member at 16" O.0 Side skirts of 12 -gauge steel Metal skirts that are not reinforced full length will not be accepted A tool box under the left side (street side) will be approximately nine cubic feet Toolbox doors must be double wall doors with synthetic weather strip seals Latches to be spring loaded, striker plate with "T" handles Doors to be bottom hinged on piano type hinge Service access doors to provide ease of access to hose reel and tool box compartments The minimum door size is 30" x 18" Access doors smaller than these minimums will not be accepted Top access door to the hose reel compartment there shall be a cut out for each spray gun allowing the gun to be locked in the hose reel compartment without disconnecting the gun from the paint hose Specifications List continued on next page 18 Specifications List continued on next page 19 NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION SPECIFICATION INCWDED (YES/NO) 21. Paint Storage (Service Body) Seven 1" steel rings (to prevent 5 gallons paint cans from shifting) to be mounted on a removable tray with side handles Paint storage well to be drilled for drainage Paint storage tray to be secured with 2 "T" handle bolts for easy removal `�-�-) l 22, Gun Solvent Bath (Service Body) Dual recessed #" (min) diameter paint gun solvent bath holsters to be included in the rear panel Holsters must be removable for easy cleaning j , `'' ( 23. Hydraulic Reservoir (Service Body) The hydraulic reservoir is to have a 30 -gallon capacity It shall be an integral part of bogy headboard It shall be mounted above the piston pump to prevent positive head Reservoir shall have incorporated into it a vent, oil filter plug, oil drain plug, and oil level sight gauge Bolt on hydraulic reservoir tanks will not be accepted 1 24. Hydraulic System (Service Body) A minimum 12.0 GPM at 1000RPM hydraulic gear pump with electric clutch is to be provided The pump to be engine mounted and "V" belt driven from the crankshaft pulley Engine speed to be controlled by a chassis manufactures installed electronic throttle control There shall be a 10 -micron retum line spin on oil filter One1000-PSI maximum adjustable pressure regulator with gauge (0- 2000 PSI) and one 0-2000 PSI gauge for each pump to be furnished Cab mounted key switch with indicator light plus rear mounted waterproof on/off safety switch is to be included All hoses, piping, and fittings are to be SAE hydraulic rated L-p� 25. Body Lights Combination stop/turn lights, clearance lights, and side marker lights to be furnished All lights and reflectors to conform to Federal Motor Vehicle safety standard 108 made waterproof Rear lights to be recessed in body Two seal beam lights will be mounted on the truck - one will illuminate the paint well area, the other the tailgate work area A toggle switch will be located in the cab to turn these lights on and off LI Specifications List continued on next page 19 NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION SPECIFICATION INCLUDED (YES/NO) 26. Stencil Rack (Service Body) A stencil rack constructed of 1" square steel tubing to accommodate 20 stencils stacked on edge to a height of 36" will be provided Each space will be 1 ' " in width Four additional spaces open at the top will be included in the rack A stencil deck roller and stop will be incorporated into the rack The rack shall be attached to the deck by a minimum of 4 rust proof bolts and nuts Lr A4 27. Bumper (Service Body) A real bumper shall extend across the full width of the vehicle and shall protrude a minimum of 9" The rear bumper shall be constructed of diamond plate steel and painted the color of the vehicle 1 " 1 1 28. Paint Spray System (Service Body) Two (2) SPEEFLO 989-002 Hydraulic Airless Paint Spray Systems to be furnished (no other brand of pump will be accepted) Each system to include: Airless pump with hard chrome over steel lowers, suction hose tube for 5 gallon paint pail, hydraulic connection hose, high pressure needle valve, 50 mesh paint filter and manifold, high-pressure (3300PS1) connection hose All hoses, fittings, valves, and connections shall be pressure tested to 3300 PSI Pump to be mounted on curbside of headboard tl I "-( 29. Hose Reel and Gun (Service Body) Two (2) spring rewind hose reels with 50' each of/. " high pressure (3000PSI) static grounded hose, hose ball stops, and 3' whip and hose to be furnished Graco Contractor Guns with 12" gun extensions and Zip Tip systems included with each system Fluid hose reels to be mounted on curbside Dual hose roller assemblies mounted in the rear body panel Drain holes to be provided for all cabinet spaces 17c` 30. Arrowboard (Service Body) A 36" x 72" Trifunction, 25 light arrowboard with a cab mounted remote control is to be provided The arrowboard must come with an electric lift Arrowboard to be mounted above headboard so as to be clearly visible ( . 7 31. Paint (Service Body) Frame and stencil rack to be painted black Balance of truck to be painted with one prime coat and one finished coat of manufactures standard white All parts to be painted shall be thoroughly cleaned of all weld splatter, slag, scale, and other foreign matter prior to painting The unit to be undercoated throughout Li 20 VENDOR INFORMATION Name of Vendor: raA cam._ live, Mo Address: Phone: E -Mall: ) tM 1-v Jam % iv.1.► ! rfric . i.es. FORD F-550 XL SUPER DUTY CHASSIS CAB Make: Model: G. Year: 'lute Color: Make: Model: i PIMP UTILITY BED Year: Color: 21 PRICE Vehicle Price: f 3t '5) Equipment Price: Sales Tax: , c �6 $ $ TOTAL PRICE: $ 1. Costs stated within the Unit Sales Price are all inclusive for Specifications listed. 2. The price is to include one complete Technical Services Manual for the truck and all other equipment plus one parts book and Owner's Manual for unit supplied. 3. Price quoted shall include all delivery and unloading charges. 4. Upon delivery, the vendor shall provide a minimum of five hour on the job training for operators and mechanics. 6. The equipment furnished under this contract shall be completely services by the vendor prior to delivery. It shall be ready for operation when delivered. Any further servicing by the vendor will not be required except in connection with repairs or adjustments covered by the manufacturer or dealer's warranty 6. The vehicle furnished shall be new and unused, current model with standard factory fittings, trim and accessories unless otherwise noted. 7. Signing this Proposal guarantees delivery within 245 days of receipt of Purchase Order. PRINT NAME OF AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE: N\ \‘`-+/t_ LM -r.r s 22 Item No. 9 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Patrick A. Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: March 27, 2018 SUBJECT: Award of a Construction Contract to PTM General Engineering Services, Inc. for the Traffic Signal Installation — Redhawk Parkway/Vail Ranch Parkway at El Chimisal Road/Tehachapi Pass, PW15-09 PREPARED BY: Amer Attar, Principal Civil Engineer Kendra Hannah-Meistrell, Senior Civil Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Award a Construction Contract to PTM General Engineering Services, Inc., in the amount of $299,099, for the Traffic Signal Installation — Redhawk Parkway/Vail Ranch Parkway at El Chimisal Road/Tehachapi Pass, PW15-09; 2. Authorize the City Manager to approve Contract Change Orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $29,909.90, which is equal to 10% of the contract amount; 3. Make a finding that the Traffic Signal Installation — Redhawk Parkway/Vail Ranch Parkway at El Chimisal Road/Tehachapi Pass project is exempt from Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) fees. BACKGROUND: On September 5, 2017, City Council approved the plans and specifications and authorized the Department of Public Works to solicit construction bids for the Traffic Signal Installation — Redhawk Parkway/Vail Ranch Parkway at El Chimisal Road/Tehachapi Pass, PW15-09. The Traffic Signal Installation — Redhawk Parkway/Vail Ranch Parkway at El Chimisal Road/Tehachapi Pass project is necessary to mitigate impacts from traffic generated by the Terracina development outside the City limits. The City was able to secure $250,000 from the developer of Terracina to contribute to the installation costs. The subject intersection is located on a major arterial adjacent to an elementary school. Vehicle movements are uncontrolled along the major arterial with stop signs at El Chimisal Road and Tehachapi Pass. This traffic signal is necessary and will improve school area safety and traffic circulation. Eight bids were electronically received and opened through PlanetBids on Tuesday, March 6, 2018. The results were as follows: 1. PTM General Engineering Services, Inc. $299,099 2. DBX, Inc. $313,561 3. Elecnor Belco Electric, Inc. $326,291 4. California Professional Engineering Inc. $338,900 5. Calpromax Engineering, Inc. $347,900 Asplundh Construction LLC Non-responsive Traffic Loops Crackfilling, Inc. Non-responsive Lekos Electric, Inc. Non-responsive Asplundh Construction, LLC and Lekos Electric, Inc. have been deemed non-responsive because the bidder's signatures were not notarized on the Non -Collusion Affidavits. Traffic Loops Crackfilling, Inc. has been deemed non-responsive because the bidder's signature was not notarized on the Bid Bond. Staff has reviewed the bid proposals and found PTM General Engineering Services, Inc. of Riverside, California to be the lowest responsible bidder for this project. PTM General Engineering Services, Inc. has public contracting experience and has completed similar projects for other public agencies in Southern California. The Engineer's Estimate for the project was $260,000. The project specifications allow for 40 working days, which is an approximate duration of two months. The Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) is an element of the Riverside County Integrated Project (RCIP) to conserve open space, nature preserves and wildlife to be set aside in some areas. It is designed to protect over 150 species and conserve over 500,000 acres in Western Riverside County. The City of Temecula is a permittee to the MSHCP and as such is required to abide by the Regional Conservation Authority's (RCA) Fee Remittance and Collection Policy adopted by Resolution 07-04 on September 10, 2007. The RCA is a joint regional authority formed by the County and the Cities to provide primary policy direction for implementation of the MSHCP. Since July 1, 2008, the RCA has required that locally funded Capital Improvement Projects contribute applicable MSHCP fees within 90 -days of construction contract award. Fees outside the public right of way are calculated on a cost per acre of disturbed area basis, while fees for typical right-of-way improvements projects are 5% of construction costs. Projects funded by TUMF or Measure A are exempt from MSHCP fees, as those programs contribute directly to the MSHCP. The Traffic Signal Installation — Redhawk Parkway/Vail Ranch Parkway at El Chimisal Road/Tehachapi Pass project is exempt from MSHCP fees because this project is not considered capacity enhancing (i.e., does not increase capacity) and there is no new disturbed area. FISCAL IMPACT: The Traffic Signal Installation — Redhawk Parkway/Vail Ranch Parkway at El Chimisal Road/Tehachapi Pass is identified in the City's Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Budget for Fiscal Years 2018-22, and is funded with Developer Contributions and Development Impact Fees — Traffic Signal. Adequate funds are available for the contract amount of $299,099.00, plus a 10% contingency amount of $29,909.90, for a total encumbrance of $329,008.90. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Contract 2. Project Description 3. Project Location CITY OF TEMECULA, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT for TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION — REDHAWK PARKWAY/VAIL RANCH PARKWAY AT EL CHIMISAL ROAD/TEHACHAPI PASS PROJECT NO. PW15-09 THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into the 27th day of March, 2018 by and between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City", and PTM General Engineering Services, Inc., hereinafter referred to as "Contractor." WITNESSETH: That City and Contractor, for the consideration hereinafter named, mutually agree as follows: 1. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS The complete Contract includes all of the Contract Documents, to wit: Notice Inviting Bids, Instructions to Bidders, Proposal, Performance Bond, Labor and Materials Bond, Plans and Specifications entitled TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION — REDHAWK PARKWAY/VAIL RANCH PARKWAY AT EL CHIMISAL ROAD/TEHACHAPI PASS, PROJECT NO. PW15-09, Insurance Forms, this Contract, and all modifications and amendments thereto, the State of California Standard Plans and Specifications, (latest edition), issued by the California Department of Transportation, where specifically referenced in the Plans, Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications, and the latest version of the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, including all supplements as written and promulgated by Public Works Standards, Inc. (hereinafter, "Standard Specifications") as amended by the General Specifications, Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications for TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION — REDHAWK PARKWAY/VAIL RANCH PARKWAY AT EL CHIMISAL ROAD/TEHACHAPI PASS, PROJECT NO. PW15-09. Copies of these Standard Specifications are available from the publisher: BNi Building News Division of BNi Publications, Inc. 990 Park Center Drive, Suite E Vista, CA 92081 (760) 734-1113 The Standard Specifications will control the general provisions, construction materials, and construction methods for this Contract except as amended by the General Specifications, Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications for TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION — REDHAWK PARKWAY/VAIL RANCH PARKWAY AT EL CHIMISAL ROAD/TEHACHAPI PASS, PROJECT NO. PW15-09. In case of conflict between the Standard Specifications and the other Contract Documents, the other Contract Documents shall take precedence over, and be used in lieu of, such conflicting portions. Where the Contract Documents describe portions of the work in general terms, but not in complete detail, it is understood that the item is to be furnished and installed completed CONTRACT C-1 and in place and that only the best general practice is to be used. Unless otherwise specified, the Contractor shall furnish all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and incidentals, and do all the work involved in executing the Contract. The Contract Documents are complementary, and what is called for by anyone shall be as binding as if called for by all. Any conflict between this Contract and any other Contract Document shall be resolved in favor of this Contract. 2. SCOPE OF WORK Contractor shall perform everything required to be performed, shall provide and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment, and all utility and transportation services required for the following: TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION — REDHAWK PARKWAY/VAIL RANCH PARKWAY AT EL CHIMISAL ROAD/TEHACHAPI PASS, PROJECT NO. PW15-09 All of said work to be performed and materials to be furnished shall be in strict accordance with the Drawings and Specifications and the provisions of the Contract Documents hereinabove enumerated and adopted by City. 3. CITY APPROVAL All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be furnished and work performed and completed under the direction and supervision, and subject to the approval of City or its authorized representatives. 4. CONTRACT AMOUNT AND SCHEDULE The City agrees to pay, and Contractor agrees to accept, in full payment for, the work agreed to be done, the sum of: TWO HUNDRED NINETY NINE THOUSAND NINETY NINE DOLLARS ($299,099), the total amount of the base bid. Contractor agrees to complete the work in a period not to exceed 40 working days, commencing with delivery of a Notice to Proceed by City. Construction shall not commence until bonds and insurance are approved by City. 5. CHANGE ORDERS All change orders shall be approved by the City Council, except that the City Manager is hereby authorized by the City Council to make, by written order, changes or additions to the work in an amount not to exceed the contingency as established by the City Council. 6. PAYMENTS a. Lump Sum Bid Schedule: Before submittal of the first payment request, the Contractor shall submit to the Director of Public Works a schedule of values allocated to the various portions of the work, prepared in such form and supported by such data to substantiate its accuracy as the Director of Public Works may require. This schedule, as approved by the Director of Public Works, shall be used as the basis for reviewing the Contractor's payment requests. b. Unit Price Bid Schedule: Pursuant to Section 20104.50 of the Public Contract Code, within thirty (30) days after submission of a payment request to the City, the Contractor shall be paid a sum equal to 95% of the value of the work completed according to the bid schedule. Payment request forms shall be CONTRACT C-2 submitted on or about the thirtieth (30th) day of each successive month as the work progresses. The final payment, if unencumbered, or any part thereof unencumbered, shall be made sixty (60) days after acceptance of final payment and the Contractor filing a one-year Warranty and an Affidavit of Final Release with the City on forms provided by the City. c. Payment for Work Performed: Payments shall be made on demands drawn in the manner required by law, accompanied by a certificate signed by the City Manager, stating that the work for which payment is demanded has been performed in accordance with the terms of the Contract, and that the amount stated in the certificate is due under the terms of the Contract. Partial payments on the Contract price shall not be considered as an acceptance of any part of the work. d. Payment of Interest: Interest shall be paid on all undisputed payment requests not paid within thirty (30) days pursuant to Public Contract Code Section 20104.50. Public Contract Code Section 7107 is hereby incorporated by reference. 7. LIQUIDATED DAMAGES / EXTENSION OF TIME a. Liquidated Damages: In accordance with Government Code Section 53069.85, Contractor agrees to forfeit and pay to City the sum of $1,000 per day for each calendar day completion is delayed beyond the time allowed pursuant to Paragraph 4 of this Contract. Such sum shall be deducted from any payments due to or to become due to Contractor. b. Extension of Time: Contractor will be granted an extension of time and will not be assessed liquidated damages for unforeseeable delays beyond the control of, and without the fault or negligence of the Contractor, including delays caused by City. Within ten (10) calendar days of the occurrence of such delay, Contractor shall give written notice to City. Within thirty (30) calendar days of the occurrence of the delay, Contractor shall provide written documentation sufficient to support its delay claim to City. Contractor's failure to provide such notice and documentation shall constitute Contractor's waiver, discharge, and release of such delay claims against City. 8. WAIVER OF CLAIMS On or before making each request for payment under Paragraph 6 above, Contractor shall submit to City, in writing, all claims for compensation as to work related to the payment. Unless the Contractor has disputed the amount of the payment, the acceptance by Contractor of each payment shall constitute a release of all claims against the City related to the payment. Contractor shall be required to execute an affidavit, release, and indemnity agreement with each claim for payment. 9. PREVAILING WAGES Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contract from the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. Copies may be obtained from the California Department of Industrial Relations Internet website at http://www.dir.ca.gov. Contractor shall provide a CONTRACT C-3 copy of prevailing wage rates to any staff or subcontractor hired, and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. Contractor shall comply with the provisions of Sections 1720, 1720.9, 1725.5, 1771.1(a), 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code. Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, Contractor shall forfeit to the City, as a penalty, the sum of $200.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid Tess than the stipulated prevailing rates for any work done under this Contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of the Contract. This project, work, or service will be subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) pursuant to Labor Code Section 1771.4. 10. TIME OF THE ESSENCE Time is of the essence in this contract. 11. INDEMNIFICATION All work covered by this Contract done at the site of construction or in preparing or delivering materials to the site shall be at the risk of Contractor alone. Contractor agrees to save, indemnify, hold harmless and defend the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, its officers, employees, and agents, against any and all liability, injuries, or death of persons (Contractor's employees included), and damage to property, arising directly or indirectly out of the obligations herein undertaken or out of the operations conducted by Contractor, save and except claims or litigations arising through the sole active negligence or sole willful misconduct of the City. The Contractor shall indemnify and be responsible for reimbursing the City for any and all costs incurred by the City as a result of Stop Notices filed against the project. The City shall deduct such costs from progress payments or final payments due to the Contractor. 12. GRATUITIES Contractor warrants that neither it nor any of its employees, agents, or representatives has offered or given any gratuities or promises to City's employees, agents, or representatives with a view toward securing this Contract or securing favorable treatment with respect thereto. 13. CONFLICT OF INTEREST Contractor warrants that none of its partners, members or shareholders are related by blood or marriage to any employee of the City who has participated in the development of the Specifications or approval of this project or who will administer this project nor are they in any way financially associated with any City officer or employee, or any architect, engineer, or other preparers of the Drawings and Specifications for this project. Contractor further warrants that no person in its employ nor any person with an ownership interest in the Contractor has been employed by the City within one year of the date of the Notice Inviting Bids. 14. CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT After the completion of the work contemplated by this Contract, Contractor shall file with the City Manager, its affidavit stating that all workmen and persons employed, all firms supplying materials, and all subcontractors upon the Project have been paid in full, and CONTRACT C-4 that there are no claims outstanding against the Project for either labor or materials, except certain items, if any, to be set forth in an affidavit covering disputed claims or items in connection with a Stop Notice which has been filed under the provisions of the laws of the State of California. 15. NOTICE TO CITY OF LABOR DISPUTES Whenever the Contractor has knowledge that any actual or potential labor dispute is delaying or threatens to delay the timely performance of the Contract, Contractor shall immediately give notice thereof, including all relevant information with respect thereto, to City. 16. BOOKS AND RECORDS Contractor's books, records, and plans or such part thereof as may be engaged in the performance of this Contract, shall at all reasonable times be subject to inspection and audit by any authorized representative of the City. 17. INSPECTION The work shall be subject to inspection and testing by City and its authorized representatives during manufacture and construction and all other times and places, including without limitation, the plants of Contractor and any of its suppliers. Contractor shall provide all reasonable facilities and assistance for the safety and convenience of inspectors. All inspections and tests shall be performed in such manner as to not unduly delay the work. The work shall be subject to final inspection and acceptance notwithstanding any payments or other prior inspections. Such final inspection shall be made within a reasonable time after completion of the work. 18. DISCRIMINATION Contractor represents that it has not, and agrees that it will not, discriminate in its employment practices on the basis of race, creed, religion, national origin, color, sex, age, or handicap. 19. GOVERNING LAW The City and Contractor understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Contract and also govern the interpretation of this Contract. 20. PROHIBITED INTEREST No member, officer, or employee of the City of Temecula or of a local public body who has participated in the development of the Specifications or approval of this project or will administer this project shall have any interest, direct or indirect, in the Contract or the proceeds thereof during his/her tenure or for one year thereafter. Furthermore, the Contractor covenants and agrees to their knowledge that no board member, officer or employee of the City of Temecula has any interest, whether contractual, non -contractual, financial or otherwise, in this transaction, or in the business of the contracting party other than the City of Temecula, and that if any such interest comes to the knowledge of either party at any time, a full and complete disclosure of all such information will be made, in writing, to the other party or parties, even if such interest would not be considered a conflict of interest under Article 4 (commencing with CONTRACT C-5 Section 1090) or Article 4.6 (commencing with Section 1220) of Division 4 of Title I of the Government Code of the State of California. 21. ADA REQUIREMENTS. By signing this Contract, Contractor certifies that the Contractor is in total compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Public Law 101-336, as amended. 22. WRITTEN NOTICE. Any written notice required to be given in any part of the Contract Documents shall be performed by depositing the same in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid, directed to the address of the Contractor as set forth in the Contract Documents, and to the City addressed as follows: Mailing and Delivery Address: Patrick A. Thomas, PE Director of Public Works / City Engineer City of Temecula 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 23. CLAIM DISPUTE RESOLUTION. In the event of any dispute or controversy with the City over any matter whatsoever, the Contractor shall not cause any delay or cessation in or of work, but shall proceed with the performance of the work in dispute. The Contractor shall retain any and all rights provided that pertain to the resolution of disputes and protests between the parties. The disputed work will be categorized as an "unresolved dispute" and payment, if any, shall be as later determined by mutual agreement or a court of law. The Contractor shall keep accurate, detailed records of all disputed work, claims and other disputed matters. All claims arising out of or related to the Contract or this project, and the consideration and payment of such claims, are subject to the Government Claims Act (Government Code Section 810 et seq.) with regard to filing claims. All such claims are also subject to Public Contract Code Section 9204 and Public Contract Code Section 20104 et seq. (Article 1.5), where applicable. This Contract hereby incorporates those provisions as though fully set forth herein. Thus, the Contractor or any Subcontractor must file a claim in accordance with the Government Claims Act as a prerequisite to filing a construction claim in compliance with Section 9204 and Article 1.5 (if applicable), and must then adhere to Article 1.5 and Section 9204, as applicable, pursuant to the definition of "claim" as individually defined therein. CONTRACT C-6 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Contract to be executed on the date first above written. DATED: CONTRACTOR: PTM General Engineering Services, Inc. 5942 Acorn St. Riverside, CA (951) 710-1000 elizabeth@ptm-eng.com By: Print or type NAME Print or type TITLE By: Print or type NAME Print or type TITLE (Signatures of two corporate officers required for Corporations) DATED: CITY OF TEMECULA By: Matt Rahn, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney CONTRACT C-7 L Capital Improvement Program Fiscal Years 2018-22 TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION - CITYWIDE Circulation Project Signal Location Cost to Complete Year Funding Source Winchester Road at Roripaugh Road Signal Modification(3) $ 75,000 2016-17 DIF(Traffic) Vail Ranch Parkway at Tehachapi Pass/EI Chimisal Road(1) $ 250,000 2016-17 Developer Contributions $ 45,000 2016-17 DIF(Traffic) Meadows Parkway at Pauba Road(2) $ 379,968 2017-18 DIF(Traffic) Meadows Parkway at Leena Way(2) $ 242,000 2017-18 DIF(Traffic) De Portola Road at Campanula Way (East)(2) Rancho Califonia Road at Temecula Ridge(2) $ 260,000 2018-19 DIF(Traffic) $ 280,000 2018-19 DIF(Traffic) Meadows Parkway at Campanula Way (West)(2) $ 280,000 2019-20 DIF(Traffic) Rancho California Road at Tee Drive $ 295,000 2019-20 Measure S Rancho California Road at Promenade Chardonnay $ 55,000 2019-20 Measure S Rancho California Road at Promenade Chardonnay $ 240,000 2019-20 Unspecified Ynez Road at Waverly Lane $ 300,000 2020-21 Measure S Butterfield Stage Road at Rancho Vista Road $ 295,000 2021-22 Measure S Rancho Vista Road at Avenida de la Reina $ 105,000 2021-22 Measure S Rancho Vista Road at Avenida de la Reina $ 175,000 2021-22 Unspecified Ynez Road at Rancho Way $ 280,000 2021-22 Unspecified $ 3,556,968 (1) Developer Contributions is $250,000 (2) DIF Traffic Developer Reimbursement (3) Amount included in Carry over to be completed by June 2017. Fiscal Year 2016-17 $ 370,000 Fiscal Year 2017-18 $ 621,968 Fiscal Year 2018-19 $ 540,000 Fiscal Year 2019-20 $ 870,000 Fiscal Year 2020-21 $ 300,000 Fiscal Year 2021-22 $ 855,000 TOTAL: $ 3,556,968 74 1 $ 4,000 1 $ 8,000 1 $ 4,000 1 $ 8,000 1 Capital Improvement Program Fiscal Years 2018-22 TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION - CITYWIDE Circulation Project Project Description: This project includes the design, construction, installation and modification of traffic signals at various locations throughout the City including: Rancho California Road, Ynez Road, Butterfield Stage Road, Meadows Parkway, Rancho Vista Road and Redhawk Parkway/Vail Ranch Parkway. The project also includes reimbursement for developer installed traffic signals. Benefit / Core Value: This project improves traffic safety and circulation throughout the City. In addition, this project satisfies the City's Core Values of a Healthy and Livable City, A Safe and Prepared Community, and Transportation Mobility and Connectivity. Project Status: A priority list of traffic signals has been developed. The traffic signals scheduled for installation will be designed and constructed in the scheduled fiscal year. Reimbursements for developer installed traffic signals will be made as Development Impact Fee (DIF) traffic become available. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.165.682 Level: I Project Cost: Prior Years FYE 2017 2017-18 Actual Carryover Adopted 2018-19 Expenditures Budget Appropriation Projected 2019-20 Projected 2021-22 2020-21 Projected and Total Project Projected Future Years Cost Administration $ 68,168 $ 45,000 $ 30,000 $540,000 $ 280,000 $ 225,780 $ 143,168 Construction $ 85,800 $ 400,532 $ 349,468 $540,000 $ 870,000 $350,000 $ 805,000 $ 3,400,800 Design/Environmental $ 13,000 $ 250,000 $ 13,000 Totals $ 166,968 $ 445,532 $ 379,468 $540,000 $ 870,000 $350,000 $ 805,000 $3,556,968 Prior Years FYE 2017 2017-18 Source of Funds: Actual Carryover Adopted 2018-19 Expenditures Budget Appropriation Projected 2019-20 Projected 2020-21 Projected 2021-22 Total Project Projected Cost DIF (Traffic Signals) $ 166,968 $ 195,532 $ 379,468 $540,000 $ 280,000 $ 225,780 $ 1,787,748 Developer Contributions $ 250,000 $ 250,000 Measure S $ 350,000 $350,000 $ 350,000 $ 1,050,000 Unspecified* $ 240,000 $ 229,220 $ 469,220 Total Funding: $ 166,968 $ 445,532 $ 379,468 $ 540,000 $ 870,000 $350,000 $ 805,000 $ 3,556,968 Future Operation & Maintenance Costs: 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 'Project cannot be constructed until a funding source is identified 75 TI1ECIT1qp TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION - REDHAWK PARKWAY/VAIL TEMECULA RANCH PARKWAY AT EL CHIMISAL ROAD/TEHACHAPI PASS IY TNRNr. 682.3 9 341.14 682.3 Feet WGS_1984_W eb_Mercator_Auxiliary_Sphere © Latitude Geographics Group Ltd. This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate, current, or otherwise reliable. THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION Legend LI Parcels Highways HWY ▪ INTERCHANGE ▪ INTERSTATE OFFRAMP mu ONRAMP ▪ USHWY Street Names City of Temecula Boundary Notes Item No. 10 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager Jk o CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Patrick A. Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: March 27, 2018 SUBJECT: Adopt a Resolution and a Mitigated Negative Declaration, Approve the Plans and Specifications, and Authorize Solicitation of Construction Bids for Pechanga Parkway Widening, PW15-14 PREPARED BY: Avlin R. Odviar, Senior Civil Engineer William Becerra, Associate Engineer II RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 18- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE PECHANGA PARKWAY WIDENING PROJECT (PW15-14) AND APPROVING THE PROJECT 2. Approve the Plans and Specifications, and Authorize the Department of Public Works to Solicit Construction Bids for the Pechanga Parkway Widening, PW15-14; BACKGROUND: On November 17, 2015, the City Council approved an Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) between the City and the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians (Pechanga Tribe) in connection with the Pechanga Resort and Hotel Expansion Project (Hotel Project). The IGA includes the terms of implementing mitigation measures to address off - reservation impacts resulting from the Hotel Project. Traffic impacts and mitigation measures are described in the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) included in draft Tribal Environmental Impact Report (TEIR) prepared for the Hotel Project. The Pechanga Parkway Widening project, PW15-14 (Project) is one of the mitigation measures identified. The Project consists of widening Pechanga Parkway, from Via Gilberto to North Casino Drive, to provide a Principal Arterial Road with six traffic lanes. These improvements will include the widening of the existing roadway and the construction and/or relocation of support structures, storm drain, sewer & water utilities, curb & gutter, and other related items. This project satisfies the City's Core Values of Transportation Mobility and Connectivity. Staff contracted with Michael Baker International to complete an Initial Study (IS), which included an Air Quality Analysis, Habitat Assessment and MSHCP Consistency Analysis, and Cultural Resources Assessment, Geotechnical Investigation, Water Quality Management Plan, and Noise Analysis. The IS identified no impact or less than significant impact for the following environmental areas of concern: • Agriculture and Forestry Resources • Air Quality • Greenhouse Gas Emissions • Hazards & Hazardous Materials • Land Use and Planning • Mineral Resources • Population & Housing • Public Services • Recreation • Traffic and Transportation • Utilities and Service Systems The IS identified the following areas of concern as less than significant impact with mitigation incorporated: • Aesthetics • Biological Resources • Cultural Resources • Geology and Soils • Hydrology and Water Quality • Noise • Tribal Cultural Resources Under CEQA guidelines, a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for the project is required with mitigation measures identified for the potential impacts to a level of insignificance. Staff recommends that the City Council adopt an MND for this project. A list of the proposed mitigation measures are included within the attached Final MND. The Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration public review comment period commenced on May 19, 2017 and concluded on June 19, 2017. Notices were mailed to surrounding property owners, signs were placed on the project site, and a notice was placed in the local newspaper. The City of Temecula received three written comments and responded to each comment in the in the attached Final MND which includes all timely received written comments and Reponses thereto. The Final MND was provided to commenting agencies in compliance with State Law. Any subsequent public comments may be presented to the City Council for consideration. Project plans and specifications are complete and the project is ready to be advertised for construction bids. The contract documents are available for review in the office of the Director of Public Works. The Engineer's Estimate is $2,480,000 and the number of allowable working days is one hundred twenty, which is six months. FISCAL IMPACT: This project is identified in the City's Capital Improvement Program, Fiscal Years 2018-22. The source of funding is Pechanga Tribe Contributions in accordance with the Intergovernmental Agreement dated November 17, 2015. There are sufficient funds in the project account to cover the estimated cost of construction. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution 2 Initial Study/MND 3 Project Description 4 Project Location Map RESOLUTION NO. 18- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE PECHANGA PARKWAY WIDENING PROJECT (PW15-14) AND APPROVING THE PROJECT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On November 17, 2015, the City Council approved an Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) between the City and the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians (Pechanga Tribe) in connection with the Pechanga Resort and Hotel Expansion Project (Hotel Project). The IGA includes the terms of implementing mitigation measures to address off -reservation impacts resulting from the Hotel Project. Traffic impacts and mitigation measures are described in the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) included in draft Tribal Environmental Impact Report (TEIR). B. The TIA and TEIR identify a need to widen Pechanga Parkway to three lanes in each direction, between Via Gilberto and North Casino Drive (Project). C. Per the terms of the IGA, the Pechanga Tribe agrees to fund the Project and the City agrees to perform the work. D. Pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the approval of the Project. Based upon the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that there was no substantial evidence that the Project could have a significant effect on the environment and a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. E. The Project was processed including, but not limited to all public notices, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law, including the California Environmental Quality Act, Public Resources Code 21000, et seq. and the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, 14. Cal. Code Regs 15000 et seq. (collectively referred to as "CEQA"). F. Pursuant to CEQA, the City is the lead agency for the Project because it is the public agency with the authority and principal responsibility for approving the Project. G. On March 27, 2018, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, the City Council considered the Project and any comments received prior to or at the public hearing on March 27, 2018, at which time the City staff presented its report, and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to the Project and the Mitigated Negative Declaration. H. Three written communications were received prior to the March 27, 2018 public meeting on the Project and a response to all of the comments made therein was prepared, submitted to the City Council and incorporated into the administrative record of the proceedings. One of the correspondences was a letter received from the State Clearinghouse and Planning Unit of the Governor's Office of Planning and Research documenting the City's circulation of the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration to various State agencies for review as required by CEQA. The City Council reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and considered all testimony and comments received regarding the Project and the Mitigated Negative Declaration prior to and at the March 27, 2018 public hearing, and based on substantial evidence in the whole record before it finds that: (1) The Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; (2) There is no substantial evidence that the Project will have a significant effect on the environment; and (3) The Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the City Council. Section 2. Based on the findings set forth in this Resolution, the City Council hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the Project. The Director of Public Works is authorized and directed to file a Notice of Determination in accordance with CEQA. Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. The City Council hereby approves the Project for the Pechanga Parkway Widening Project (PW15-14) and authorizes the Director of Public Works to proceed with the preparation of Plans and Specifications for this Project. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 27th of day March, 2018. Matt Rahn, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 18- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 27th day March, 2018, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl, City Clerk RESPONSE TO COMMENTS Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) Pechanga Parkway Widening Project LEAD AGENCY: City of Temecula 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 Contact: William Becerra Associate Engineer (951) 506-5142 PREPARED BY: Michael Baker International 40810 County Center Drive, Suite 200 Temecula, California 92591 Contact: Mr. Darren Edgington, CEP -IT, LEED AP (951) 506-2083 JN 145559 July, 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening Project Final IS/MND PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK July, 2017 2 Response to Comments City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening Project Final IS/MND COMMENT LETTER NO. 1 Destiny Colocho on behalf of Rincon Band of Luiseno Indians, dated May 23, 2017 Response 1.1 The comment is an introduction to the letter. The commenter thanks the City for the consultation notification and states that the project location is within the Territory of the Luiseho people. No further response is necessary. Response 1.2 The commenter defers review of the project to the Pechanga Band of Luiseho Indians and Soboba Band of Luiseho Indians who are located closer to the project area. The City of Temecula conducted consultation with the relevant Native American tribes, pursuant to the requirements of AB 52, including both the Soboba and Pechanga Bands of Luiseho Indians. No further response is necessary. Response 1.3 The City of Temecula appreciates and values your participation during the public review process. No further response is necessary. July, 2017 3 Response to Comments City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening Project Final IS/MND PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK July, 2017 4 Response to Comments City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening Project Final IS/MND Comment Letter No. 2 Scott Morgan on behalf of Governor's Office of Planning and Research, dated June 20, 2017 Response 2.1 The comment acknowledges that the City of Temecula has complied with the State Clearinghouse review requirements for draft environmental documents, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. No further response is necessary Response 2.2 This comment from the State Clearinghouse provides contact information regarding questions on the environmental review process. No further response is necessary. July, 2017 5 Response to Comments City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening Project Final IS/MND PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK July, 2017 6 Response to Comments City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening Project Final IS/MND Comment Letter No. 3 Mark Roberts on behalf of Department of Transportation, dated June 7, 2017 Response 3.1 The comment is an introduction to the letter and provides general project background information. No response is required. Response 3.2 The commenter provides general background regarding the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) jurisdiction and responsibilities. The City of Temecula acknowledges this comment. No further response is necessary Response 3.3 The commenter states that the California Department of Transportation has no comments on the proposed project, and that it appears there will be no significant impacts to the State Highway System. The commenter states that the California Department of Transportation does reserve the right to comment on any future revisions to this project. The City of Temecula acknowledges this comment. No further response is necessary. Response 3.4 The commenter provides contact information should the project be revised so that Caltrans can provide updated recommendations for impact mitigation. The City of Temecula appreciates and values your participation during the public review process. No further response is necessary. July, 2017 7 Response to Comments RINCON BAND OF LUISENO INDIANS Cultural Resources Department 1 W. Tribal Road • Valley Center, California 92082 (760) 297-2635 Fax:(760) 692-1498 May 23, 2017 Luke Watson City of Temecula Community Development Planning Division 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 Re: Pechanga Parkway Widening Project Dear Mr. Watson: COMMENT LETTER 1 This letter is written on behalf of Rincon Band of Luiseno Indians. We have received your notification regarding the Pechanga Parkway Widening Project and we thank you for the consultation notification. 1.1 The location you have identified is within the Territory of the Luiseno people. Embedded in the Luiseno Territory are Rincon's history, culture and identity. The project is within the Luiseno Aboriginal Territory of the Luiseno people however, it is not within Rincon's Historic Boundaries. We do not have any additional information regarding this project but, we defer this project to the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians or Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians who are located closer to your project area. Thank you for the opportunity to protect and preserve our cultural assets. Destiny Colocho Manager Rincon Cultural Resources Department 1.2 11.3 Bo Mazzetti Tribal Chairman Tishmall Turner Vice Chairwoman Steve Stallings Laurie E. Gonzalez Council Member Council Member Alfonso Kolb Council Member Edmund G. Brown Jr. Governor June 20, 2017 COMMENT LETTER 2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA Governor's Office of Planning and Research State Clearinghouse and Planning Unit William Becerra City of Temecula 41000 Main St Temecula. CA 92590 Subject: Pechanga Parkway Widening Project SCH#: 2017051059 Dear William Becerra: a * 9n ; •�• �,4.OF CMOs Ken Alex Director The State Clearinghouse submitted the above named Mitigated Negative Declaration to selected state agencies for review. The review period closed on June 19, 2017, and no state agencies submitted comments by that date. This letter acknowledges that you have complied with the State Clearinghouse 2.1 review requirements for draft environmental documents, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. Please call the State Clearinghouse at (916) 445-06I3 if you have any questions regarding the environmental review process. If you have a question about the above-named project, please refer to the ten -digit State Clearinghouse number when contacting this office. Sincerehr / Scott Morgan Director, State Clearinghouse 1400 TENTH STREET P.O. BOX 3044 SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95812-3044 TEL (916) 445-0613 FAX (916) 323-3018 www.opr.ca.gov 2.2 Document Details Report State Clearinghouse Data Base SCH# 2017051059 Project Title Pechanga Parkway Widening Project Lead Agency Temecula, City of Type MND Mitigated Negative Declaration Description The project proposes widening of Pechanga Parkway from four lanes to six lanes. The widening would occur along a segment of the existing roadway, spanning approx 3,500 ft, extending from approx 320 ft north of Via Gilberto to approx 320 ft south of North Casino Dr. The existing roadway includes four travel lanes in each direction, a landscaped center median, and left-hand tum lanes for access to Via EduardoNVolf Valley Rd, Casino Dr, and Pechanga Resort Dr. The existing roadway also includes a sidewalk throughout the project area, as well as bike lanes in both directions, with exception of along the southbound lanes along the frontage of the Pechanga Resort & Casino. The project also includes addition of new center median curb and landscaping; installation of a fiber optics cable; and, re -location of streetlights/traffic signals. The project also includes curb/gutter, sound wall, sidewalk, landscaping, irrigation, and storm drain improvements. The proposed roadway widening would expand the Pechanga Parkway Phase 11 improvements that occurred in 2009. The project is aimed at expanding existing improvements to alleviate traffic along Pechanga Parkway and to further the long-term transportation needs identified by the city's general plan. Lead Agency Contact Name William Becerra Agency City of Temecula Phone (951) 693-3963 email Address 41000 Main St City Temecula Fax State CA Zip 92590 Project Location County Riverside City Temecula Region Lat/Long 33° 27' 34.76" N / 117° 06' 28.00" W Cross Streets Via Gilberto/North Casino Dr Parcel No. Township Range Section Base Proximity to: Highways SR 79, 1-15 Airports Railways Waterways Temecula Creek; Wolf Creek Channel Schools Land Use Roadway ROW Project Issues Aesthetic/Visual; Agricultural Land; Air Quality; Archaeologic -Historic; Biological Resources; Cumulative Effects; Flood Plain/Flooding; Forest Land/Fire Hazard; Geologic/Seismic; Growth Inducing; Landuse; Minerals; Noise; Population/Housing Balance; Public Services; Recreation/Parks; Schools/Universities; Septic System; Sewer Capacity; Soil Erosion/Compaction/Grading; Solid Waste; Toxic/Hazardous; Traffic/Circulation; Vegetation; Water Quality; Water Supply; Wetland/Riparian; Wildlife Reviewing Agencies Resources Agency; Department of Fish and Wildlife, Region 6; Department of Parks and Recreation; Department of Water Resources; California Highway Patrol; Caltrans, District 8; Native American Heritage Commission; Regional Water Quality Control Board, Region 7; State Water Resources Control Board, Division of Drinking Water; Air Resources Board, Transportation Projects Note: Blanks in data fields result from insufficient information provided by lead agency. Document Details Report State Clearinghouse Data Base Date Received 05/19/2017 Start of Review 05/19/2017 End of Review 06/19/2017 Note: Blanks in data fields result from insufficient information provided by lead agency. ,}TATE OF CALIFORNIA—CALIFORNIA STATE TRANSPORTATION AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 8 PLANNING 464 WEST FOURTH STREET, 6th FLOOR, MS 725 SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92401-1400 PHONE (909) 383-4147 FAX (909) 383-5936 TTY 711 www.dot.ca.gov/dist8 June 7, 2017 William Becerra City of Temecula Planning Department 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 EDMUND G. BROWN Jr _ GovemoE Algatik COMMENT LETTER 3 Making Conservation a California way ofLife. RIV 15 PM 3.38 Subject: Pechanga Parkway Widening Project — Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Dear Mr. Becerra The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) has completed the review of Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the Pechanga Parkway Widening Project. The objective of the proposed project is to widen Pechanga Parkway from a four lane (110 feet width) facility to six lanes (134 feet width) generally between Via Gilberto and North Casino Drive in order to accommodate existing and predicted traffic demands and uphold the City of Temecula's goals to reduce traffic congestion, improve safety on roadways, and provide better access to regional transportation routes. 3.1 As the owner and operator of the State Highway System (SHS), it is our responsibility to coordinate and consult with local jurisdictions when proposed development may impact our facilities. Under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), we are required to make recommendations to offset associated impacts with the proposed project. Although the project is under the jurisdiction of the City of Temecula, it is also 3.2 subject to the policies and regulations that govern the SHS due to the project's potential impact to State facilities. We have no comments as it appears there will be no significant impacts to the SHS; however, Caltrans T 3.3 reserves the right to comment on any future revisions to this project. 1 We appreciate the opportunity to offer comments concerning this project. If this proposal is revised in any way, please forward the appropriate information to this Office so that updated recommendations for impact 3.4 mitigation may be provided. If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact Kwasi Agyakwa at (909) 806-3955 or myself at (909) 383-4557 for assistance. Sincerely, MARK ROBERTS Office Chief Intergovernmental Review, Community and Regional Planning "Provide a safe, sustainable, integrated and efficient transportation system to enhance California's economy and livability" Pechanga Parkway Widening Project MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM PROJECT NAME: Pechanga Parkway Widening Project PROJECT MANAGER: William Becerra, Associate Engineer, City of Temecula PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project addressed in this IS/MND consists of all actions related to the widening of Pechanga Parkway from four to six lanes generally between Via Gilberto and North Casino Drive. PROJECT LOCATION: INTRODUCTION: The proposed project is generally located in Temecula and involves segments of Pechanga Parkway from approximately 320 feet north of Via Gilberto to approximately 320 feet south of North Casino Drive. This document is the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) for the Pechanga Parkway Widening Project. An MMRP is required for the proposed Project because the IS/MND has identified significant adverse impacts, and measures have been identified to mitigate those impacts. This MMRP has been prepared pursuant to Section 21081.6 of the California Public Resources Code, which requires public agencies to "adopt a reporting and monitoring program for the changes made to the project or conditions of project approval, adopted in order to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment." As the lead agency, the City of Temecula will be responsible for monitoring compliance with all mitigation measures. Different City departments are responsible for various aspects of the Project. The MMRP identifies the department with the responsibility for ensuring the measure is completed; however, it is expected that one or more departments will coordinate efforts to ensure compliance. The MMRP is presented in tabular form on the following pages. The components of the MMRP are described briefly below. • Source and Mitigation Measure: The mitigation measures are taken from the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND), in the same order they appear in the IS/MND. • Timing: Identifies at which stage of the Project the mitigation must be completed. • Monitoring Responsibility: Identifies the department in the City with responsibility for mitigation monitoring. • Date Completed and Signature: Provides a contact who reviewed the mitigation measure and the date the measure was determined complete. Wage JULY Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Matrix City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening Project SOURCE MITIGATION MEASURE TIMING MONITORING DATE COMPLETED SIGNATURE AESTHETICS Draft IS/MND Section 4.1- Aesthetics Aesthetics Mitigation Measure 1 (AES -11 Prior to Construction City of Temecula Public Works Department Prior to construction, the City shall define the temporary construction equipment staging areas to be used within the project site. Materials, heavy-duty equipment, and debris piles shall be clustered in order to minimize visual impacts during construction. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Draft IS/MND Section 3.4 -Commencement Biological Resources Biological Resources Mitigation Measure 1(BIO-11 Within 30 days prior to of any 1 Ground -Disturbing Activities City of Temecula Community Development / Public Works Department P Within 30 days prior to commencement of any ground -disturbing activities (e.g., clearing, grubbing, demolition, earthmoving, construction), burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia) surveys shall be conducted by a qualified biologist per the Burrowing Owl Survey Protocol and Mitigation Guidelines (California Burrowing Owl Consortium 1997) and the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (California Department of Fish and Wildlife [CDFW]; March 7, 2012), as follows: • During the burrowing owl (BUOW) breeding season (February 1 through August 31), protocol surveys for active nest burrows shall be performed within potentially suitable habitat (as determined by the biologist) inside and up to 500 feet from the demarcated disturbance limits. A non- disturbance buffer of 250 feet shall be delineated by the biologist around active nests, in consultation with CDFW, and no disturbance activities shall occur within the buffer(s) until the BUOW breeding season is over. • During the non -breeding season for BUOW (September 1 through January 31), protocol surveys for resident BUOWs shall be performed within potentially suitable habitat (as determined by the biologist) inside and up to 500 feet from the demarcated disturbance limits. A passive relocation program may be implemented for observed BUOWs using occupied burrows pursuant to CDFW approval. The relocation of resident BUOWs shall be according to a relocation plan prepared by the biologist in consultation with and approved by CDFW. This plan shall provide for BUOW 2 SOURCE MITIGATION MEASURE TIMING MONITORING DATE COMPLETED SIGNATURE relocations to nearby suitable conserved lands possessing available nesting habitat and appropriate development -free buffers that are protected in perpetuity via conservation easements or other land preservation mechanisms. • The pedestrian protocol surveys shall include two early morning surveys between one hour before and two hours after sunrise, and two evening surveys between two hours before and one hour after sunset, via transects spaced to allow 100%visual coverage of the ground surface. The distance between transect center lines shall average approximately 100 feet, and may be reduced in places to account for differences in terrain, vegetation density, and ground surface visibility. Draft IS/MND Section 3.4- Biological Resources Biological Resources Mitigation Measure 2 (BIO -2} Prior to/During Construction City of Temecula Public Works Department 1. Within seven days prior to commencement of grading/construction activities, a qualified biologist shall perform a pre -construction survey within 500 feet from the proposed work limits. 2. If active avian nest(s) are discovered within or 500 feet from the work limits, a buffer shall be delineated around the active nest(s) measuring 300 feet for passerines and 500 feet for raptors. A qualified biologist shall monitor the nest(s) weekly after commencement of grading/construction to ensure that nesting behavior is not adversely affected by such activities. 3. If the qualified biologist determines that nesting behavior is adversely affected by grading/construction activities, then a noise mitigation program shall be implemented in consultation with CDFW, to allow such activities to proceed. Once the young have fledged and left the nest(s), then grading/construction activities may proceed within 300 feet (500 feet for raptor species) of the fledged nest(s). 4. Raptor nests are protected under Section 3503.5 of the California Fish and Game Code (California Law 2011) which makes it unlawful to take, possess, or destroy any birds in the orders Falconiformes or Strigiformes; or, to take, possess, or destroy the nests or eggs of any such birds. Consultation with CDFW shall be required prior to the removal of any raptor nest(s) observed during the preconstruction clearance surveys. CULTURAL RESOURCES 3 SOURCE MITIGATION MEASURE TIMING MONITORING DATE COMPLETED SIGNATURE Draft IS/MND Section 3.5- Cultural Resources Cultural Resources Mitigation Measure 1 (CR -11 During Ground- Disturbing Activities City of Temecula Community Development / Public Works Department A professional archaeological monitor shall be present to monitor all ground -disturbing activities associated with the project. The archaeological monitor shall work under the direct supervision of a Cultural Resource Professional that meets the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualification Standards for Archaeology. Additionally, a Native American tribal representative for the Pechanga Tribe shall be invited to voluntarily monitor initial ground -disturbing activities that involve trenching for utility installation and earthmoving activities for water quality basins, initial site grading, and/or fill of imported soil onto the site. The archaeological monitor shall be authorized to divert construction equipment to investigate any areas suspected to contain cultural resources. In the event that cultural resources are discovered on the project site during project construction, all work shall be halted immediately within 50 feet of the discovery and the resources shall be evaluated by a qualified archaeologist and the most likely descendant (MLD) Tribe. Evaluations shall take place in consultation with the City of Temecula and any participating Native American entities. Any unanticipated cultural resources that are discovered shall be evaluated and a final report prepared by the qualified archaeologist. The report shall include a list of the resources discovered, documentation of each site/locality, and interpretation of the resources identified, and the method of preservation and/or recovery for identified resources. If the qualified archaeologist determines the cultural resources to be either historic resources or unique archaeological resources, avoidance and/or mitigation will be required pursuant to and consistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(c) and Public Resources Code Section 21083.2. Draft IS/MND Section 3.5- Cultural Resources Cultural Resources Mitigation Measure 2 (CR -21 During Ground- Disturbing Activities City of Temecula Community Development / Public Works Department Consistent with State CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5, Subdivision (e), in the event of an accidental discovery or recognition of any human remains, the County Coroner shall be notified and construction activities at the affected work site shall be halted. If the remains are found to be Native American, the County Coroner shall notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) within 24 hours. The NAHC shall immediately notify the most likely descendant(s) under Public Resources Code Section 5097.98, and the descendants must make recommendations or state their preference for treatment within 48 hours of being granted access to the site. Guidelines of the NAHC shall be adhered to in the treatment and disposition of the remains in accordance with the provisions of Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 and Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. 4Page SOURCE MITIGATION MEASURE TIMING MONITORING DATE COMPLETED SIGNATURE GEOLOGY AND SOILS Draft IS/MND Section 3.6-Commencement Geology and Soils Geology and Soils Mitigation Measure 1(GEO-1) Prior to of Grading City of Temecula Public Works Department Prior to commencement of any project grading activities, and in accordance with National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) requirements, the City of Temecula shall prepare a stormwater pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) for approval by the City's Public Works Department. The SWPPP shall include relevant best management practices (BMPs) in order to minimize soil erosion and water quality impacts during project construction. NOISE Draft IS/MND Section 3.12- Noise Prior to initiation of construction, the City of Temecula shall ensure that the following measures are incorporated into construction contract documents: • All construction equipment, fixed, or mobile, shall be equipped with properly operating and maintained mufflers and other State required noise attenuation devices. • A construction notice shall be mailed to residents within a 150-foot radius of the project and shall indicate the dates and duration of construction activities, as well as provide a contact name and a telephone number where residents can inquire about the construction process and register complaints. • All construction, maintenance, or demolition activities associated with the proposed project shall be limited to the hours between 7:00 AM and 4:00 PM Mondays — Fridays. All construction on weekends and National holidays shall be prohibited. • Construction haul routes shall be designed to avoid noise sensitive uses (e.g., residences, convalescent homes, etc.). • During construction, stationary construction equipment shall be placed such that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive noise receivers. • Construction equipment staging areas shall be located away from adjacent sensitive receptors. Prior to Construction City of Temecula Public Works Department ADMINISTRATIVE DRAFT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Pechanga Parkway Widening LEAD AGENCY: City of Temecula 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 Contact: William Becerra Associate Engineer (951) 693-3963 PREPARED BY: Michael Baker International 40810 County Center Drive, Suite 200 Temecula, CA 92591 Contact: Darren Edgington, CEP -IT, LEED AP (951) 506-2083 JN 153547 May 2017 PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 STATUTORY AUTHORITY AND REQUIREMENTS 1 1.2 PURPOSE 1 1.3 CONSULTATION 2 1.4 INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE 2 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2 2.1 PROJECT LOCATION AND SETTING 2 2.2 BACKGROUND 3 2.3 PROJECT OBJECTIVES 3 2.4 PROJECT CHARACTERISTICS 3 2.5 AGREEMENTS, PERMITS, AND APPROVALS 4 2.6 INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST 5 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 21 3.1 AESTHETICS 21 3.2 AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY RESOURCES 24 3.3 AIR QUALITY 26 3.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES 33 3.5 CULTURAL RESOURCES 42 3.6 GEOLOGY AND SOILS 48 3.7 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS 53 3.8 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS 58 3.9 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY 62 3.10 LAND USE AND PLANNING 67 3.11 MINERAL RESOURCES 69 3.12 NOISE 71 3.13 POPULATION AND HOUSING 77 3.14 PUBLIC SERVICES 79 3.15 RECREATION 81 3.16 TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC 82 3.17 TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES 86 3.18 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS 89 3.19 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE 92 May 2017 i Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening 4.0 REFERENCES 95 4.1 REPORT PREPARATION PERSONNEL 95 4.2 REFERENCE DOCUMENTS 96 4.3 INVENTORY OF MITIGATION MEASURES 99 5.0 CONSULTANT RECOMMENDATION 105 6.0 LEAD AGENCY DETERMINATION 107 LIST OF TABLES Table 2.5-1: Required Permit Approvals 4 Table 3.3-1: Maximum Short -Term Construction Emissions (Pounds per Day) 29 Table 3.3-2: Localized Significance Summary —Onsite Construction Emissions (Pounds per Day) 31 Table 3.7-1: Greenhouse Gas Emissions — Project Operations (Metric Tons per Year) 54 Table 3.7-2: Consistency with SCAG's Regional Transportation Plan/ Sustainable Communities Strategy Goals 56 Table 3.12-1: Maximum Noise Levels Generated by Construction Equipment 73 Table 3.12-2: Typical Construction Equipment Vibration Levels 75 LIST OF EXHIBITS Exhibit 1: Regional Location Map 9 Exhibit 2: Local Vicinity Map 11 Exhibit 3a: Site Plan 13 Exhibit 3b: Site Plan 15 Exhibit 3c: Site Plan 17 Exhibit 3d: Site Plan 19 APPENDICES Appendix A: Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas Data Appendix B: Habitat Assessment/MSHCP Consistency Analysis Appendix C: Cultural Resources Assessment & Tribal Consultation Appendix D: Geotechnical Investigation Appendix E: Water Quality Management Plan Appendix F: Noise Data Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration ii May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening 1.0 INTRODUCTION Following preliminary review of the proposed Pechanga Parkway Widening Project (proposed project), the City of Temecula (City) has determined that the project is subject to the guidelines and regulations of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). This Initial Study has been prepared to address potential impacts associated with the project, as described below. This Initial Study addresses the potential direct, indirect, and cumulative environmental effects associated with implementation of the proposed project. 1.1 STATUTORY AUTHORITY AND REQUIREMENTS In accordance with CEQA (Public Resources Code Sections 21000-21177) and pursuant to Section 15063 of the California Code of Regulations (CCR) and the City's Local CEQA Guidelines, the City, acting in the capacity of lead agency, is required to undertake the preparation of an Initial Study to determine if the proposed project would have a significant environmental impact. If the City finds that there is no evidence that the project, either as proposed or as modified to include the mitigation measures identified in this Initial Study, may cause a significant effect on the environment, the City shall find that the proposed project would not have a significant effect on the environment and shall prepare a Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project. Such a determination may be made only if "there is no substantial evidence in light of the whole record before the lead agency" that such impacts may occur (Public Resources Code Section 21080(c)). This document has been prepared to provide an environmental basis for subsequent discretionary actions for the project, to inform the City prior to taking action on the project, and to provide responsible agencies, trustee agencies, other affected agencies, and the general public with information regarding the project and its potential environmental effects. As discussed further in Section 3.1, the discretionary actions anticipated to be required for the proposed project by the City are the adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration and approval of an Encroachment Permit, City of Temecula General Plan Circulation Element Amendment, Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan, and Traffic Control Plan. It is also anticipated that the project will require approval of utility service connections. The following environmental documentation and supporting analysis is subject to a 30 -day public review period. During this review, comments on the document relative to environmental issues should be addressed to the City of Temecula. Following review of comments received, the City will consider the comments as part of the project's environmental review process. 1.2 PURPOSE The purpose of the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) is to (1) identify potential environmental impacts; (2) provide the lead agency with information to use as the basis for deciding whether to prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) or Negative Declaration (including a Mitigated Negative Declaration); (3) enable an applicant or the lead agency to modify a project, mitigating adverse impacts before an EIR is prepared; (4) facilitate environmental assessment early in the design of the project; (5) provide documentation of the factual basis for the finding in a Negative Declaration that a project would not have a significant environmental effect; (6) eliminate needless EIRs; (7) determine whether a previously prepared EIR could be used for the project; and (8) assist in the preparation of an EIR, if required, by focusing the EIR on the May 2017 1 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening effects determined to be significant, identifying the effects determined not to be significant, and explaining the reasons for determining that potentially significant effects would not be significant. As discussed further below, the City has determined that the project will not result in significant environmental impacts with the incorporated mitigation and has circulated this draft IS/MND for public review and comment. Section 15063 of the CEQA Guidelines identifies specific disclosure requirements for inclusion in an Initial Study. Pursuant to those requirements, an Initial Study shall include (1) a description of the project, including the location of the project; (2) an identification of the environmental setting; (3) an identification of the environmental effects by use of a checklist, matrix, or other method, provided that entries on a checklist or other form are briefly explained to indicate that there is some evidence to support the entries; (4) a discussion of ways to mitigate significant effects identified, if any; (5) an examination of whether the project is compatible with existing zoning, plans, and other applicable land use controls; and (6) the name of the person or persons who prepared or participated in the preparation of the Initial Study. 1.3 CONSULTATION As soon as the lead agency has determined that an Initial Study would be required for the project, the lead agency is directed to consult informally with responsible agencies and trustee agencies that are responsible for resources affected by the project, in order to obtain the recommendations of those agencies as to whether an EIR or Negative Declaration should be prepared for the project. Following receipt of any written comments from those agencies, the lead agency would consider any recommendations of those agencies in the formulation of the preliminary findings. Following preparation of this Initial Study, the City of Temecula will initiate formal consultation with these and other governmental agencies, as required under CEQA and its implementing guidelines. 1.4 INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE Pertinent documents relating to this IS/MND have been cited and incorporated, in accordance with Sections 15148 and 15150 of the CEQA Guidelines. The following references were utilized during preparation of this Initial Study and are available for review on the City and County of Riverside websites: • City of Temecula General Plan, 2005 • City of Temecula General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report, 2005 • City of Temecula Development Code • Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2.1 PROJECT LOCATION AND SETTING The proposed Pechanga Parkway Widening Project (proposed project) is located in the City of Temecula within southwestern Riverside County, California; refer to Exhibit 1, Regional Location Map. More specifically, the project is located along, and adjacent to, the existing Pechanga Parkway alignment from Via Gilberto to North Casino Drive; refer to Exhibit 2, Local Vicinity Map. Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 2 May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening The project site, which includes an approximately 3,500 -foot segment of the existing roadway, consists of improved road right-of-way (ROW), as well as pedestrian facilities and an existing flood control channel. There are a number of overhead and underground utilities, which serve the surrounding area, that are located within the existing road ROW. These utilities include a fiber optics cable, electrical, gas, storm drain, sewer, recycled and domestic water. A number of the existing aboveground utility appurtenances (street lighting and signals) will need to be relocated during the project construction process. Additionally, the flood control facilities that run parallel to Pechanga Parkway will require modification to accommodate the widened roadway. According to the City of Temecula General Plan, the parcels adjacent to the project site include Low Medium Density Residential (LM) and Specific Plan (SP) to the north, Tribal Trust Lands (TTL) and SP to the south, LM and TTL to the west, and SP to the east. According to the City of Temecula General Plan Land Use Map, the parcels adjacent to the project site are designated as LM to the north, LM and TTL to the south, LM and TTL to the west, and LM, Medium Density Residential (M), Neighborhood Commercial (NC), and Community Commercial (CC) to the east. 2.2 BACKGROUND Incorporated in 1989, the City of Temecula ("City") is located in southwestern Riverside County and is one of the fastest growing cities in California. Currently, the City is home to over 106,000 residents and spans over 37.18 square miles. According to the City of Temecula General Plan, the City was planned in a manner that would preserve and enhance high quality living while preserving the topography of the surrounding area. Temecula is known as the heart of Southern California wine country due to the expansive viticulture -related land uses in the eastern regions of the City. Pechanga Parkway functions as a primary north -south arterial for the southern portion of the City of Temecula circulation network. In response to high traffic volumes, the proposed project would continue the 2009 Pechanga Parkway Phase II Improvements that widened Pechanga Parkway to a six -lane facility from State Route 79 South (Temecula Parkway) to Via Gilberto and a four -lane facility from Via Gilberto to Wolf Valley Road. 2.3 PROJECT OBJECTIVES The objective of the proposed project is to widen Pechanga Parkway from a four lane (110 feet width) facility to six lanes (134 feet width) generally between Via Gilberto and North Casino Drive in order to accommodate existing and predicted traffic demands and uphold the City of Temecula's goals to reduce traffic congestion, improve safety on roadways, and provide better access to regional transportation routes. Due to the expansion of the Pechanga Resort & Casino and continued residential and commercial development along Pechanga Parkway, additional roadway capacity to meet existing and future needs was identified. 2.4 PROJECT CHARACTERISTICS The project proposes the widening of Pechanga Parkway from a four lane (110 feet width) facility to six lanes (134 feet width). The roadway widening would occur along a segment of the existing roadway, spanning approximately 3,500 feet. The improvements would extend from approximately 320 feet north of Via Gilberto to approximately 320 feet south of North Casino Drive; refer to Exhibit 2. Local Vicinity Map, and Exhibits 3a — 3d, Site Plan. May 2017 3 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening As the roadway exists, it includes four travel lanes in each direction, a landscaped center median, and left-hand turn lanes for access to Via Eduardo/Wolf Valley Road, Casino Drive, and Pechanga Resort Drive. The existing roadway also included sidewalk throughout the project area, as well as bike lanes in both directions, with the exception of on the southbound roadway along the frontage of the Pechanga Resort & Casino. The proposed widening would include the following modifications to the roadway: • Construction to accommodate the addition of new travel lanes; • Construction of two (2) additional travel lanes; • Addition of new center median curb and landscaping; • Installation of a fiber optics cable; • Re -location of streetlights and traffic signals. The proposed roadway widening would expand the Pechanga Parkway Phase II improvements that occurred in 2009 which widened Pechanga Parkway to a six -lane facility from State Route 79 South (Temecula Parkway) to Via Gilberto and a four -lane facility from Via Gilberto to Wolf Valley Road. The roadway widening is aimed at expanding the existing improvements to alleviate traffic along Pechanga Parkway and further the long-term transportation needs identified by the City of Temecula General Plan. Besides the widening of Pechanga Parkway from four lanes to six lanes, the project also includes curb, gutter, sound wall, sidewalk, landscaping, irrigation, and storm drain improvements. Project construction would occur over six months beginning in spring 2017. Construction activities include site mobilization; demolition; minor grading; installation of asphalt and concrete; relocation of utilities; and traffic striping. 2.5 AGREEMENTS, PERMITS, AND APPROVALS The following permits are anticipated for the proposed project: Table 2.5-1: Required Permit Approvals Agreements, Permits, and Approvals Granting Agency IS/MND Approval City of Temecula Encroachment Permit City of Temecula City of Temecula General Plan Circulation Element Amendment City of Temecula Traffic Control Plan City of Temecula Stormwater Pollution Prevent Plan City of Temecula General Construction Storm Water Permit San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 4 May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening 2.6 INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST 2.6.1 BACKGROUND 1. Project Title: Pechanga Parkway Widening Project 2. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Temecula 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 3. Contact Person and Phone Number: Stuart Fisk, Principal Planner (951) 506-5159 4. Project Location: The proposed project is generally located in Temecula and involves segments of Pechanga Parkway from approximately 320 feet north of Via Gilberto to approximately 320 feet south of North Casino Drive. 5. Lead Agency's Name and Address: City of Temecula 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 6. General Plan Designation: The project would be located in the road right-of-way. The General Plan Land Use Designations adjacent to the project site include Low Medium Density Residential (LM) to the north, LM and Tribal Trust Lands (TTL) to the south, LM and TTL to the west, and LM, Medium Density Residential (M, Neighborhood Commercial (NC), and Community Commercial (CC) to the east. 7. Zoning: The project would be located within the road right-of-way. The zoning adjacent to the project site includes LM and Specific Plan (SP) to the north, TTL and SP to the south, LM and TTL to the west, and SP to the east. 8. Description of the Project: The project addressed in this IS/MND consists of all actions related to the widening of Pechanga Parkway from four to six lanes generally between Via Gilberto and North Casino Drive. 9. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The lands surrounding the project site have the following uses: North: LM South: LM and TTL East: LM, M, NC, and CC West: LM and TTL 10. Other public agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement). San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board (General Construction Permit) May 2017 5 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening 2.6.2 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS This section analyzes the potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed project. The issue areas evaluated in this Initial Study include: • Aesthetics • Agriculture and Forestry Resources • Air Quality • Biological Resources • Cultural Resources • Geology and Soils • Greenhouse Gas Emissions • Hazards and Hazardous Materials • Hydrology and Water Quality • Land Use and Planning • Mineral Resources • Noise • Population and Housing • Public Services • Recreation • Transportation/Traffic • Utilities and Service Systems after the Initial Study Checklist The environmental analysis in this section is patterned recommended by the State CEQA Guidelines, Appendix G, and is used by the City in its environmental review process. For the preliminary environmental assessment undertaken as part of this Initial Study's preparation, a determination that there is a potential for significant effects indicates the need to fully analyze the project's impacts and to identify mitigation. For the evaluation of potential impacts, the questions in the Initial Study Checklist are stated with appropriate answers provided according to the analysis undertaken as part of the Initial Study. The analysis considers the project's long-term, direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts. To each question, there are four possible responses: • No Impact. The project will not have any measurable environmental impact on the environment. • Less Than Significant Impact. The project will have the potential for impacting the environment, although this impact will be below established thresholds that are considered to be significant. • Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. The project will have the potential to generate impacts that may be considered as a significant effect on the environment, although mitigation measures or changes to the project's physical or operational characteristics can reduce these impacts to levels that are less than significant. • Potentially Significant Impact. The project will have impacts that are considered significant, and additional analysis is required to identify mitigation measures that could reduce these impacts to less than significant levels. Where potential impacts are anticipated to be significant, mitigation measures will be required, so that impacts may be avoided or reduced to insignificant levels. Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 6 May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening 2.6.3 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. x Aesthetics Mineral Resources Agriculture and Forestry Resources X Noise Air Quality Population and Housing x Biological Resources Public Services x Cultural Resources Recreation x Geology and Soils Transportation/Traffic Greenhouse Gas Emissions x Tribal Cultural Resources Hazards and Hazardous Materials Utilities and Service Systems X Hydrology and Water Quality X Mandatory Findings of Significance Land Use and Planning May 2017 7 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 8 May 2017 Perris. ake Elsinore land 9e •Sedco Hills Wildom ar' Murrieta? NAVAL WEAPONS 5 rAT!ON SEAL BEACi,' C'ETACNMENrcALLPP•7',.. Fallbrook. Legend ieu* Project Site Ntievo. ,AK -y Airport Aomoland DOUG L. BUTTE 5un City Winchel Murrieta 4rench Hot Spring s Valley Airport Temecula' AN TAlN Project Site A 74#1A y JUN TAW libiA PA VA* 'en1.4A 0.4 LA Content may not reflect National Geographic's"ZurrentImap policy. Sources: National Geographic, Esri, DeLorme, HERE, UNEP-WCMC, USGS, NASA, ESA, METI, NRCAN, GEBCO, NOA-A, increment P Corp. Michael Baker INTERNATIONAL PECHANGA PARKWAY WIDENING PROJECT IS/MND 0 1 2 4 Miles Regional Vicinity Map Exhibit 1 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 10 May 2017 Michael Baker INTERNATIONAL JN 153547 PECHANGA PARKWAY WIDENING PROJECT IS/MND Local Vicinity Map Figure 2 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 12 May 2017 Michael Baker VIA Figure 3e Figure 3b Figure 3c Figure 3d 1211 ms: s ._: DRIVE Michael Baker ,F110 COUNTY MI. OR SJITE ,c ', INTERNATIONAL we..Fnwncaa �)SJETIN a EITCIRM DRAIN b8 _\ _I .,t H�aJil�_ T -� • PECHANGA PARKWAY vv 12LH V =1 DPMi- TH. '_JDO i 8 S1,7 88 8 8ib1 8 PECHANGA PARKWAY WIDENING PROJECT IS/MND Site Plan INTERNATIONAL JN,53547 Figure 3a City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK Initial Study,Mitigated Negative Declaration 14 May 2017 Michael Baker 777 rt , Figure 3a Figure 3b EXISTING; STDRi i DRAIN WHAIiNi\IFL S NT. ENI/SELF WH.IQT Figure 3c Figure 3d COM MAIM MLN MIME Me LIE LOMTIM 1MOMr1 MWm.OI1 to MUIWT IN WM WOLF VALLEY RD. r WME F6 r91 (fVM1E121NC MiQFII.E) DEVELOPMENT Tic. 29305 E6 4 "--SLCIAE REEAIN 8ALL DAMENT SED MTH 8 DM �*DA/TI LE.. IONS tx. DAYLIGHT 8 er.iY1KE L-� AL iiM.. )) Irolul Novnrla VIA EWARDO Michael Bilker ANEMIA GEM, eme10INTERNATIONALRe.wnct PECHANGA PARKWAY PECHANGA PARKWAY WIDENING PROJECT IS/MND Site Plan INTERNATIONAL ,N,53547 Figure 3b City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 16 May 2017 0 ;;il WOLF CREEK DEVELOPMENT IFL 29305 9:XISTIN9 STORM DRAJN CHANNEL 8 0 Michael Baker INTERNATIONAL', Michael Baker RV MEP 0111.2 ,mR Fgure 3a Figure 3b Figure 3c Figure 3d L. ORIA 5F, -` 6} ---kms.. ' L �Tw x r$rm' SEN; P7CHA1v1CiA CA3iNC PECHANGA PARKWAY 40 20 0 W ff_AE 1 442 PECHANGA PARKWAY WIDENING PROJECT IS/MND Site Plan INTERNATIONAL JN 153501 Figure 3c City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK Initial StudylMitigoted Negative Declaration 18 May 2017 Michael Baker Figure 3a Figure 3b Figure 3c r Figure 3d WOLF CREEK DEVELOPMENT 29305 :U3 -11N5 :5-r RnA .,. Michael Baker 5,41,E lee 1 0 11 A L Leucrnm% 1 c � PECHANGA PARKWAY eo PECHANGA PARKWAY WIDENING PROJECT IS/MND Site Plan INTERNATIONAL ,N Is3sn Figure 3d City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK Initial StudylMitigated Negative Declaration 20 May2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS The following evaluation provides responses to the questions in the CEQA Environmental Checklist. A brief explanation for each question in the checklist is provided to support each impact determination. All responses consider the whole of the action involved, including construction and operational impacts, as well as direct and indirect impacts. Environmental factors potentially affected by the proposed project are presented below and organized according to the provided checklist format. Evaluation of the following resources was based on review of preliminary construction plans, available site geotechnical data, and other sources listed in Section 4.0, References, of this analysis. 3.1 AESTHETICS 1. AESTHETICS—would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State scenic highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? ❑ 0 0 0 ❑ ❑ 0 0 ❑ 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? Determination: Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. A scenic vista is generally defined as a view of undisturbed natural lands exhibiting a unique or unusual feature that comprises an important or dominant portion of the view shed. Scenic vistas may also be represented by a particular distant view that provides visual relief from less attractive views of nearby features. Other designated federal and State lands, as well as local open space or recreational areas, may also offer scenic vistas if they represent a valued aesthetic view within the surrounding landscape of nearby features. Temecula's natural setting offers a variety of scenic vistas and view sheds. The City of Temecula General Plan Community Design Element designates the southern, eastern, and western rolling hills surrounding the City, as well as Murrieta and Temecula Creeks, as significant natural features, and indicates that public views of these features should be protected and enhanced. The General Plan explains that all public or private development projects are subject to City review to ensure that they will not obstruct public views of scenic resources, and projects may be subject to redesign or height limitations if it is determined that development would block public views. May 2017 21 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 1. AESTHETICS—would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State scenic highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? ❑ 0 0 0 ❑ ❑ 0 0 ❑ 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? Determination: Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. A scenic vista is generally defined as a view of undisturbed natural lands exhibiting a unique or unusual feature that comprises an important or dominant portion of the view shed. Scenic vistas may also be represented by a particular distant view that provides visual relief from less attractive views of nearby features. Other designated federal and State lands, as well as local open space or recreational areas, may also offer scenic vistas if they represent a valued aesthetic view within the surrounding landscape of nearby features. Temecula's natural setting offers a variety of scenic vistas and view sheds. The City of Temecula General Plan Community Design Element designates the southern, eastern, and western rolling hills surrounding the City, as well as Murrieta and Temecula Creeks, as significant natural features, and indicates that public views of these features should be protected and enhanced. The General Plan explains that all public or private development projects are subject to City review to ensure that they will not obstruct public views of scenic resources, and projects may be subject to redesign or height limitations if it is determined that development would block public views. May 2017 21 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening The project site is located approximately one mile south of Temecula Creek and 0.4 miles east of the southern rolling hills that surround the City. Both Temecula Creek and the southern rolling hills are designated as view sheds within the City's General Plan. Existing development north of the project site blocks public views to the Temecula Creek. As such, the construction and operation of the proposed project would not have the potential to adversely impact views to Temecula Creek and its associated aesthetic features; however, public views of the southern rolling hills are afforded to motorists and pedestrians traveling along Pechanga Parkway. Residents east of the project site also have views to the rolling hills, and thus may be impacted through project implementation. For this reason, construction of the proposed project has the potential to adversely impact views to the southern rolling hills and their associated aesthetic features. Mitigation Measure AES -1 would require designation of temporary construction staging areas in a clustered fashion in order to minimize construction -related aesthetic impacts to existing views of the southern rolling hills. With the implementation of Mitigation Measure AES -1, construction - related impacts would be less than significant. The project does not propose any new permanent aboveground structures that would block views of the southern rolling hills. The roadway improvements would consist of relocating/installing traffic signals/street lighting, widening Pechanga Parkway from four to six lanes, installation of a fiber optics cable, and relocation of the existing landscaped median. The existing traffic signals and street lighting would be relocated to accommodate the expanded roadway. These are not considered improvements that would substantially affect views of the southern rolling hills. Therefore, with incorporation of Mitigation Measure AES -1, impacts would be less than significant. MITIGATION MEASURES AES -1 Prior to construction, the City shall define the temporary construction equipment staging areas to be used within the project site. Materials, heavy-duty equipment, and debris piles shall be clustered in order to minimize visual impacts during construction. b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State scenic highway? Determination: No Impact. No rock outcroppings or historic buildings are present onsite. According to the California Department of Transportation's Scenic Highways Program Database, the project area does not contain any officially designated scenic highways (Caltrans 2016). The nearest eligible scenic highway is Interstate 15 (1-15), which is located approximately 1.35 miles west of the project site. Views of the 1-15 are not afforded from the project site. Due to the absence of designated scenic highways in the vicinity of the project site, no impact would occur. c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? Determination: Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. The project site is characterized by paved asphalt roadway ROW. The site is surrounded by residential, commercial, drainage, undeveloped, and entertainment land uses. Short-term visual impacts associated with project construction activities would occur due to the presence of construction equipment and heavy-duty vehicles, materials and debris piles, and general construction activities; however, these impacts would be temporary and limited to the construction duration of the project. Mitigation Measure AES -1, included above, would reduce Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 22 May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening visual impacts through the clustering of construction equipment within onsite temporary staging areas to reduce the visibility of construction activities from offsite public vantage points. The project would result in limited permanent visual changes associated with the minor fill and paving of areas adjacent to the existing roadway and possible relocation of landscaped medians, signals/lighting, and utilities. As such, once construction is complete, the road widening would not impact the visual character of the project site. Based on these considerations and with implementation of Mitigation Measure AES -1, the proposed project would have a less than significant operational impact on the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings. MITIGATION MEASURES AES -1 Refer to Impact 3.1(a), above. d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Temporary glare from construction activities (including construction equipment and related materials) is possible, but due to the anticipated small -sized construction crew and short-term construction duration, no new substantial sources of Tight or glare would result from the project. Construction would occur during daylight hours, and the project would not require nighttime construction lighting. The project does not propose any nighttime construction activities that would require the use of nighttime lighting. As such, substantial impacts related to light or glare are not anticipated during project construction. Anticipated long-term light sources would include traffic signals and street lighting. These lighting features would be installed or relocated in order to safeguard public safety of motorists and pedestrians travelling along Pechanga Parkway. The light sources proposed with the project are not considered substantial and would be similar to existing lighting sources along Pechanga Parkway and would be designed to avoid light spillage from the right-of-way to the adjoining properties. Further, the project would be required to comply with Riverside County Ordinance 655, which regulates light pollution for the Palomar Observatory. Palomar Observatory is located approximately 17 miles southeast of the project site. According to Ordinance 665, the project is located in Zone B (15-45 miles from the Palomar Observatory). The project would comply with the development standards outlined for Zone B, including its lamp type and shielding requirements. Compliance with Ordinance 665 would ensure that the project's impacts related to light pollution would be less than significant. For these reasons, impacts associated with the construction and long-term operation of the project would be Tess than significant. May 2017 23 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening 3.2 AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY RESOURCES 2. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES — In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment project; and forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to nonagricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code Section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code Section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code Section 51104(g))? d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forestland to non -forest use? e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of farmland to nonagricultural use or conversion of forestland to non -forest use? ❑ ❑ 0 Q ❑ 0 0 Q O 0 0 IJ O 0 0 LI ❑ 0 0 LJ Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to nonagricultural use? Determination: No Impact. According to the California Department of Conservation (2012) Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program (FMMP), the project site is not located in an area identified as Prime Farmland, Farmland of Statewide Importance, or Farmland of Local Importance. Along the affected segment, all adjoining lands are designated as Urban and Built -Up Land with the exception of the two undeveloped parcels that border the site to the east. These parcels are designated as Farmland of Local Importance; however, all improvements proposed with the project would occur within the right-of-way and would not encroach onto or interfere with any activities on these adjacent lands. As such, the project would not convert farmland to non- agricultural use. No impact would occur. Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 24 May 2017 Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 2. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES — In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment project; and forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to nonagricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code Section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code Section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code Section 51104(g))? d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forestland to non -forest use? e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of farmland to nonagricultural use or conversion of forestland to non -forest use? ❑ ❑ 0 Q ❑ 0 0 Q O 0 0 IJ O 0 0 LI ❑ 0 0 LJ Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to nonagricultural use? Determination: No Impact. According to the California Department of Conservation (2012) Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program (FMMP), the project site is not located in an area identified as Prime Farmland, Farmland of Statewide Importance, or Farmland of Local Importance. Along the affected segment, all adjoining lands are designated as Urban and Built -Up Land with the exception of the two undeveloped parcels that border the site to the east. These parcels are designated as Farmland of Local Importance; however, all improvements proposed with the project would occur within the right-of-way and would not encroach onto or interfere with any activities on these adjacent lands. As such, the project would not convert farmland to non- agricultural use. No impact would occur. Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 24 May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? Determination: No Impact. Refer to Impact 3.2(a), above. As a roadway, Pechanga Parkway does not have a zoning designation. Further, there are no Williamson Act or agriculturally zoned properties adjacent to the project site. No impact would occur in this regard. c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code Section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code Section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code Section 51104(g))? Determination: No Impact. According to the City of Temecula's General Plan and Development Code, the proposed project would not be located adjacent to areas designated or zoned as forest land. Therefore, implementation of the proposed project would not conflict with existing zoning of forest land, timberland, or timberland production, and no impact would occur. d) Result in the loss of forestland or conversion of forest land to non forest use? Determination: No Impact. Refer to Impact 3.2(c), above. No impact would occur. e) Involve other changes in the existing environment, which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of farmland to nonagricultural use? Determination: No Impact. Refer to Impacts 3.2(a) and 3.2(b), above. No impact would occur. May 2017 25 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening 3.3 AIR QUALITY 3. AIR QUALITY— Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is nonattainment under an applicable federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? o o Q o ❑ ❑ 0 0 O 0 Q 0 Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? Determination: No Impact. The proposed project site is located in the South Coast Air Basin (Basin), which is under the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). The SCAQMD is required, pursuant to the federal Clean Air Act (CAA), to reduce emissions of criteria pollutants for which the Basin is in nonattainment: ozone (O3), coarse particulate matter (PM10), and fine particulate matter (PM2.$). These are considered criteria pollutants because they are three of several prevalent air pollutants known to be hazardous to human health.' In order to reduce emissions of criteria pollutants for which the Basin is in nonattainment, the SCAQMD has adopted the 2012 Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP). The 2016 AQMP is currently in draft form and has not yet been adopted The 2012 AQMP establishes a program of rules and regulations directed at reducing air pollutant emissions and achieving State (California) and national air quality standards. The 2012 AQMP is a regional and multi -agency effort including the SCAQMD, the California Air Resources Board (CARB), Southern California Council of Governments (SCAG), and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The 2012 AQMP pollutant control strategies are based on the latest scientific and technical information and planning assumptions, including SCAG's 2012 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS), updated emission inventory methodologies for various source categories and SCAG's latest growth forecasts. SCAG's latest growth forecasts were defined in consultation with 1 An area designated as nonattainment for an air pollutant is an area that does not achieve national and/or State ambient air quality standards for that pollutant. Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 26 May 2017 Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 3. AIR QUALITY— Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is nonattainment under an applicable federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? o o Q o ❑ ❑ 0 0 O 0 Q 0 Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? Determination: No Impact. The proposed project site is located in the South Coast Air Basin (Basin), which is under the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). The SCAQMD is required, pursuant to the federal Clean Air Act (CAA), to reduce emissions of criteria pollutants for which the Basin is in nonattainment: ozone (O3), coarse particulate matter (PM10), and fine particulate matter (PM2.$). These are considered criteria pollutants because they are three of several prevalent air pollutants known to be hazardous to human health.' In order to reduce emissions of criteria pollutants for which the Basin is in nonattainment, the SCAQMD has adopted the 2012 Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP). The 2016 AQMP is currently in draft form and has not yet been adopted The 2012 AQMP establishes a program of rules and regulations directed at reducing air pollutant emissions and achieving State (California) and national air quality standards. The 2012 AQMP is a regional and multi -agency effort including the SCAQMD, the California Air Resources Board (CARB), Southern California Council of Governments (SCAG), and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The 2012 AQMP pollutant control strategies are based on the latest scientific and technical information and planning assumptions, including SCAG's 2012 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS), updated emission inventory methodologies for various source categories and SCAG's latest growth forecasts. SCAG's latest growth forecasts were defined in consultation with 1 An area designated as nonattainment for an air pollutant is an area that does not achieve national and/or State ambient air quality standards for that pollutant. Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 26 May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening local governments and with reference to local general plans. The project is subject to the SCAQMD's AQMP. It is noted that the SCAQMD has released the Draft 2016 AQMP, which is a comprehensive and integrated plan primarily focused on addressing the ozone and PM2.5 standards; however, the Draft 2016 AQMP is anticipated to be adopted by the SCAQMD Governing Board December 2016. The 2016 AQMP will incorporate the latest scientific and technical information and planning assumptions, including the latest applicable growth assumptions, RTP/SCS, and updated emission inventory methodologies for various source categories. The 2016 AQMD uses the same assumptions as the 2012 AQMP, and adoption of the 2016 AQMP would not affect project consistency.2 The Criteria for determining consistency with the AQMP is defined by the following indicators: • Consistency Criterion No. 1: The proposed project will not result in an increase in the frequency or severity of existing air quality violations, or cause or contribute to new violations, or delay the timely attainment of air quality standards or the interim emissions reductions specified in the AQMP. • Consistency Criterion No. 2: The proposed project will not exceed the assumptions in the AQMP based on the years of project buildout phase. The violations to which Consistency Criterion No. 1 refers are the California ambient air quality standards (CAAQS) and the national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS). As evaluated under Impact 3.3 (b) below, the project would not exceed the short-term construction standards or long- term operational standards and in so doing would not violate any air quality standards. Additionally, the analysis for long-term local air quality impacts shows that future carbon monoxide (CO) concentration levels along roadways and at intersections affected by project traffic would not exceed the 1 -hour and 8 -hour State CO pollutant concentration standards. Thus, a less than significant impact is expected, and the project would be consistent with the first criterion. Concerning Consistency Criterion No. 2, the AQMP contains air pollutant reduction strategies and demonstrates that the applicable ambient air quality standards can be achieved within the periods required under federal law. Growth projections from local general plans adopted by cities in the district are provided to SCAG, which develops regional growth forecasts that are used to develop future air quality forecasts for the AQMP. Development consistent with the growth projections in the City of Temecula General Plan is considered consistent with the AQMP. The proposed project would accommodate existing and predicted traffic demands and uphold the City of Temecula's goals to reduce traffic congestion, improve roadway safety, and provide better access to regional transportation routes. Project implementation would provide additional roadway capacity to accommodate the expansion of Pechanga Resort & Casino and continued residential development along Pechanga Parkway. In response to high traffic volumes, the proposed project would continue the 2009 Pechanga Parkway Phase II improvements. As the project would be designed to accommodate additional traffic volumes, the proposed improvements would not directly generate new traffic or increase the number of vehicles along the roadway. 2 The SCAQMD Governing Board will have Public Hearing to consider adoption of the 2016 Air Quality Management Plan (2016 AQMP), which outlines its strategies for meeting the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and ozone (03), on March 3, 2017. May 2017 27 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening The project would not conflict with the land use assumptions contained in the City's General Plan. Furthermore, due to the nature of the proposed project as a roadway facility improvement project, it would not result in an increase in population or employment growth beyond that anticipated in the 2012 AQMP. The proposed project would accommodate existing and predicted traffic demands and uphold the City of Temecula's goals to reduce traffic congestion, improve roadway safety, and provide better access to regional transportation routes. The project would be designed to accommodate additional traffic volumes, and would not directly generate new traffic or increase the number of vehicles along the roadway and would not result in any development or other improvements that could directly or indirectly induce population growth in the area. For these reasons, the proposed project would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of the 2012 AQMP. No impact would occur. b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? Determination: Less than Significant Impact. A discussion of the project's potential short-term construction period and long-term operational period air quality impacts is provided below. Construction Emissions The SCAQMD has established methods to quantify air emissions associated with construction activities, such as those generated by operation of onsite construction equipment, fugitive dust emissions related to grading and site work activities, and mobile (tailpipe) emissions from construction worker vehicles and haul/delivery truck trips. Emissions would vary from day to day, depending on the level of activity, the specific type of construction activity occurring, and, for fugitive dust, prevailing weather conditions. Dust (PM10) is typically a major concern during rough grading activities. Because such emissions are not amenable to collection and discharge through a controlled source, they are called "fugitive emissions." Fugitive dust emission rates vary as a function of many parameters (e.g., soil silt, soil moisture, wind speed, area disturbed, number of vehicles, depth of disturbance or excavation). All development projects in Temecula, including the proposed project, are subject to SCAQMD rules and regulations to reduce fugitive dust emissions and to mitigate potential air quality impacts per City of Temecula Municipal Code Section 18.06.300 (Dust Control and Prevention Plan), which requires that dust prevention and control procedures be employed while construction activity occurs to minimize windborne particles, and that all grading operations, land clearing, loading, stockpiling, landscaping, vehicular track -out, and haul routes comply with SCAQMD Rule 403. SCAQMD Rule 403 (Fugitive Dust) requires fugitive dust sources to implement best available control measures for all sources, and all forms of visible particulate matter are prohibited from crossing any property line. SCAQMD Rule 403 is intended to reduce PM emissions from any transportation, handling, construction, or storage activity that has the potential to generate fugitive dust. PM suppression techniques are summarized below. a) Portions of the construction site to remain inactive longer than a period of three months will be seeded and watered until grass cover is grown or otherwise stabilized in a manner acceptable to the City. b) All onsite roads will be paved as soon as feasible or watered periodically or chemically stabilized. Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 28 May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening c) All material transported off-site will be either sufficiently watered or securely covered to prevent excessive amounts of dust. d) The area disturbed by clearing, grading, earthmoving, or excavation operations will be minimized at all times. e) Where vehicles leave the construction site and enter adjacent public streets, the streets will be swept daily or washed down at the end of the workday to remove soil tracked onto the paved surface. f) Installation and utilization of a wheel washing system to remove bulk material from tires and vehicle undercarriages before vehicles exit the site. Impacts assume compliance with applicable SCAQMD Rules. The SCAQMD Rules that are currently applicable during construction activity for this project include but are not limited to: Rule 1113 (Architectural Coatings); Rule 431.2 (Low Sulfur Fuel); Rule 403 (Fugitive Dust); and Rule 1186/1186.1 (Street Sweepers). Rule 1113 and Rule 403 are quantified in the emissions model. Emissions were calculated using the California Emissions Estimator Model (CaIEEMod), version 2016.3.1, a Statewide land use emissions computer model designed to provide a uniform platform for use by government agencies, land use planners, and environmental professionals. This model was developed in coordination with the SCAQMD and is the most current emissions model approved for use in California by various other air districts. The estimated maximum daily construction emissions are summarized in Table 3.3-1, Maximum Short -Term Construction Emissions (Pounds per Day). As shown in Table 3.3-1, all construction -generated criteria pollutant emissions would remain below their respective thresholds and therefore would represent a less than significant impact. Table 3.3-1: Maximum Short -Term Construction Emissions (Pounds per Day) Construction Phase Reactive Organic Gas Nitrogen Oxide Carbon Monoxide Sulfur Oxide Coarse Particulate Matter Fine Particulate Matter Roadway Construction 2.68 27.07 18.54 0.03 4.35 1.71 SCAQMD Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55 Exceed Threshold? No No No No No No Source: CaIEEMod, version 2016.3.1. See Appendix A Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Data. Operational Emissions None of the components of the proposed project would include the provision of new permanent stationary or mobile sources of emissions. Therefore, by its nature, the project would not generate quantifiable criteria emissions from long-term operations. The project does not propose any new buildings, and therefore, no permanent source of stationary source emissions. In addition, once completed the project would not result in a permanent increase in traffic. The proposed project would accommodate existing and predicted traffic demands and uphold the City of Temecula's goals to reduce traffic congestion, improve roadway safety, and provide better access to regional transportation routes. The project would be designed to accommodate additional traffic volumes and would not directly generate new traffic or increase the number of vehicles along the roadway. Additionally, the project would improve a non -motorized transportation option by providing a sidewalk for pedestrians. Traffic conditions after the project is constructed are expected to be the same as or slightly better than existing traffic conditions. May 2017 29 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening Therefore, the project would not result in new permanent stationary or mobile sources of emissions. The proposed project would not exceed SCAQMD thresholds of significance for construction - generated criteria air pollutants and would not generate any air pollutants under its operation, resulting in a less than significant impact. c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is nonattainment under an applicable federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Related projects could contribute to an existing or projected air quality exceedance because the Basin is currently nonattainment for 03 and PM25. With regard to determining the significance of the contribution from the project, the SCAQMD recommends that any given project's potential contribution to cumulative impacts should be assessed using the same significance criteria as for project -specific impacts. Therefore, this analysis assumes that individual projects that do not generate operational or construction emissions which exceed the SCAQMD's recommended daily thresholds for project -specific impacts would also not cause a commutatively considerable increase in emissions for those pollutants for which the air basin is in nonattainment and therefore would not be considered to have a significant, adverse air quality impact. Alternatively, individual project -related construction and operational emissions that exceed SCAQMD thresholds for project -specific impacts would be considered cumulatively considerable. As previously noted, the project would not exceed the applicable SCAQMD regional threshold for construction and operational -source emissions. As such, the project would result in a cumulatively less than significant impact. d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Sensitive populations (sensitive receptors) are more susceptible to air pollution effects than the general population. Sensitive populations that are in proximity to localized sources of toxics and CO are of particular concern. Some land uses are considered more sensitive to air quality changes than others, depending on the population groups and the activities involved. The following types of people are most likely to be adversely affected by air pollution, as identified by CARB: children under 14; elderly over 65; athletes; and, people with cardiovascular and chronic respiratory diseases. Locations with potential to contain a high concentration of these sensitive population groups are called sensitive receptors and include residential areas, hospitals, day-care facilities, elder -care facilities, places of worship, elementary schools, and parks. Sensitive receptors in the project area include residential uses, schools, and parks. During construction, incidental amounts of toxic substances such as oils, solvents, paints, adhesives, and coatings would be used. The use and application of these substances would comply with all applicable SCAQMD rules for their use, storage, and disposal. The SCAQMD has established that impacts to air quality are significant if there is a potential to contribute or cause localized exceedances of the federal and/or State ambient air quality standards (NAAQS/CAAQS). Collectively, these are referred to as localized significance thresholds (LSTs). The significance of localized emissions impacts depends on whether ambient levels in the vicinity of a given proposed project are above or below State standards. In the case of CO and NO, if ambient levels are below the standards, a project is considered to have a significant impact if project emissions result in an exceedance of one or more of these standards. If ambient levels Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 30 May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening already exceed a State or federal standard, project emissions are considered significant if they increase ambient concentrations by a measurable amount. This would apply to PMlo and PM2.5, both of which are nonattainment pollutants. The SCAQMD established LSTs in response to the district's Governing Board's Environmental Justice Initiative 1-4, which was developed in response to environmental justice and health concerns raised by the public regarding exposure of individuals to criteria pollutants in local communities. LSTs represent the maximum emissions from a project that will not cause or contribute to an exceedance of the most stringent applicable federal or State ambient air quality standard at the nearest residence or sensitive receptor. The SCAQMD adopted LSTs that show whether a project would cause or contribute to localized air quality impacts and thereby cause or contribute to potential localized adverse health effects. The analysis makes use of methodology included in the SCAQMD's (2008) Localized Significance Threshold Methodology. The SCAQMD states that lead agencies can use the LSTs as another indicator of significance in air quality impact analyses. LSTs are based on the ambient concentrations of that pollutant within the project source receptor area (SRA), as demarcated by the SCAQMD, and the distance to the nearest sensitive receptor. The project site is located in SCAQMD SRA 26. LSTs apply to CO, nitrogen dioxide (NO2), PM10, and PM2,5. The SCAQMD look -up tables are intended for projects less than or equal to 5 acres in size and provide standards for projects that are 1, 2, and 5 acres; however, the proposed project site spans approximately 3 acres. Therefore, 3 acres was extrapolated using the information provided from 1, 2, and 5 -acre sites in the look -up table to identify the standard. The nearest sensitive receptors are the single-family residential communities directly adjacent to the project on either side of Pechanga Parkway. Notwithstanding, the SCAQMD methodology explicitly states: "It is possible that a project may have receptors closer than 25 meters. Projects with boundaries located closer than 25 meters to the nearest receptor should use the LSTs for receptors located at 25 meters." Therefore, LSTs for receptors located at 25 meters were utilized in this analysis. Table 3.3-2, Localized Significance Summary — Onsite Construction Emissions (Pounds per Day), identifies the localized impacts at the nearest receptor location in the project vicinity. As shown, emissions during the peak day of construction activity would not exceed the SCAQMD's LST screening thresholds. Therefore, the project's impact on sensitive receptors is less than significant. Table 3.3-2: Localized Significance Summary—Onsite Construction Emissions (Pounds per Da Construction Phase NOx CO PM10 PM2.s Maximum Emissions Maximum Daily Emissions (onsite) 18.84 13.09 2.17 1.32 SCAQMD Localized Threshold 279.67 867.00 9.00 5.33 Threshold Exceeded? No No No No Source: CaIEEMod, version 2016.3.1. See Appendix A, Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Data. Carbon Monoxide Hotspots CO emissions are a function of vehicle idling time, meteorological conditions, and traffic flow. Under certain extreme meteorological conditions, CO concentrations near a congested roadway or intersection may reach unhealthful levels (i.e., adversely affecting residents, schoolchildren, hospital patients, the elderly, etc.). The SCAQMD requires a quantified assessment of CO hotspots when a project increases the volume -to -capacity ratio (also called the intersection capacity utilization [ICU]) by 0.02 (two percent) for any intersection with an existing level of service LOS D May 2017 31 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening or worse. Because traffic congestion is highest at intersections, where vehicles queue and are subject to reduced speeds, these hot spots are typically produced at intersections. As noted previously, the proposed project involves widening Pechanga Parkway and would not generate new vehicle trips. The proposed project would reduce congestion and improve traffic flow. Therefore, it would not increase the ICU of nearby intersections to warrant a CO hotspot analysis. e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Land uses generally associated with odor complaints include agricultural uses (livestock and farming), wastewater treatment plants, food processing plants, chemical plants, composting operations, refineries, landfills, dairies, and fiberglass molding facilities. The project involves roadway improvements and does not contain land uses typically associated with emitting objectionable odors. Potential odor sources associated with the proposed project may result from construction equipment exhaust and the application of asphalt during construction activities. Standard construction requirements would minimize odor impacts from construction. Construction odor emissions would be temporary, intermittent in nature, would disperse rapidly, would not affect a substantial number of people, and would cease upon completion of the respective phase of construction. Therefore, odor impacts are considered less than significant. Additionally, construction activities would be required to comply with SCAQMD Rule 4023 to prevent occurrences of public nuisances. 3 SCAQMD Rule 402 require implementation of dust suppression techniques to prevent fugitive dust from creating a nuisance. Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 32 May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening 3.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES—Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special - status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or US Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or US Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted habitat conservation plan, natural community conservation plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan? o 0 0 0 O 0 0 E O 0 0 E o Et 0 0 O 0 IJ 0 Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special -status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or US Fish and Wildlife Service? Determination: Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. The project site is located within an urbanized area within the City of Temecula. As a roadway improvement project, the site is presently developed and/or highly disturbed. Manicured landscaped areas are present within the ROW and the existing median and include a variety of tree species, turf grass, and other ornamental plantings. In addition, areas immediately surrounding the project footprint are largely developed, with a channelized drainage feature (Wolf Valley Creek Channel) to the north and some small open fields east and west of Wolf Valley Road, north of the channel. The Wolf Valley Creek Channel is vegetated with ornamental grasses that are routinely maintained (i.e. mowed), does not contain May 2017 33 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES—Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special - status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or US Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or US Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted habitat conservation plan, natural community conservation plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan? o 0 0 0 O 0 0 E O 0 0 E o Et 0 0 O 0 IJ 0 Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special -status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or US Fish and Wildlife Service? Determination: Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. The project site is located within an urbanized area within the City of Temecula. As a roadway improvement project, the site is presently developed and/or highly disturbed. Manicured landscaped areas are present within the ROW and the existing median and include a variety of tree species, turf grass, and other ornamental plantings. In addition, areas immediately surrounding the project footprint are largely developed, with a channelized drainage feature (Wolf Valley Creek Channel) to the north and some small open fields east and west of Wolf Valley Road, north of the channel. The Wolf Valley Creek Channel is vegetated with ornamental grasses that are routinely maintained (i.e. mowed), does not contain May 2017 33 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening any riparian trees/vegetation on the bank or in the bed, and has minimal, if any, nesting habitat or habitat that would otherwise support wildlife. A query of the California Department of Fish and Wildlife's (CDFW) Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) and California Native Plant Society (CNPS) was conducted in November 2016 for reported locations of sensitive plant and wildlife species as well as sensitive natural plant communities within two miles of the project site within the Pechanga and Temecula USGS 7.5 - minute quadrangles (Michael Baker International 2016). The literature search identified nine special -status plant species, fourteen special -status wildlife species, and one special -status natural plant community as being documented within two miles of the project site; refer to Attachment D, Potentially Occurring Status Species Biological Resources, of Appendix B, Habitat Assessment/MSHCP Consistency Analysis. Based on habitat requirements for specific species and the availability and quality of onsite habitats, it was determined that the project site does not provide suitable habitat that would support any of the CNDDB, CNPS, or Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) listed plant or wildlife species that have been documented within two miles of the project site. Additionally, a site survey was performed in November 2016 to identify sensitive habitat and or undeveloped areas, jurisdictional features, riparian/riverine habitat, and other areas having the potential to support sensitive flora and fauna species, including burrowing owl (Michael Baker International 2016); refer to Appendix B. Onsite and surrounding land uses have eliminated the naturally occurring habitats around the project footprint, reducing the suitability of the habitat to support sensitive plant and wildlife species. As a result of existing development, undisturbed native plant communities are no longer present within the boundaries of the project site, and the project footprint does not offer habitat that would support any candidate, sensitive, or special - status species. Further, the project site provides limited habitat for wildlife species adapted to a high degree of human presence and development. No sensitive plant or wildlife species were observed during the habitat assessment. However, a query of the Riverside County Integrated Project (RCIP) Conservation Summary Report Generator was conducted to determine if the MSHCP lists any survey requirements for the project site; refer to Appendix B. The summary report identified that the project site is located in the designated survey area for burrowing owl as depicted in Figure 6-4 within Sections 6.3.2 of the MSHCP; however, no burrowing owl or sign (pellets, feathers, castings, or white wash) were observed during the 2016 site survey. Due to the lack of burrowing owl sign and suitable burrows, burrowing owl are presumed not to occupy the project site and have a low potential to occur onsite. Further, as the proposed widening alignment would occur within the existing paved roadway and landscaped areas, burrowing owl are presumed absent, and no impacts to this species are anticipated; however, it is recommended that a burrowing owl pre -construction clearance survey be conducted within seven days prior to ground disturbance, in accordance with the MSHCP, to ensure burrowing owl remain absent from the project site. Implementation of Mitigation Measure BIO -1 would reduce potential project impacts on burrowing owl to Tess than significant. With implementation of Mitigation Measure BIO -1, project impacts on species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special -status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the CDFW or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) would be reduced to less than significant. initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 34 May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening MITIGATION MEASURES BIO -1 Within seven days prior to commencement of any ground -disturbing activities (e.g., clearing, grubbing, demolition, earthmoving, construction), burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia) surveys shall be conducted by a qualified biologist per the Burrowing Owl Survey Protocol and Mitigation Guidelines (California Burrowing Owl Consortium 1997) and the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (California Department of Fish and Wildlife [CDFW]; March 7, 2012), as follows: • During the burrowing owl (BUOW) breeding season (February 1 through August 31), protocol surveys for active nest burrows shall be performed within potentially suitable habitat (as determined by the biologist) inside and up to 500 feet from the demarcated disturbance limits. A non -disturbance buffer of 250 feet shall be delineated by the biologist around active nests, in consultation with CDFW, and no disturbance activities shall occur within the buffer(s) until the BUOW breeding season is over. • During the non -breeding season for BUOW (September 1 through January 31), protocol surveys for resident BUOWs shall be performed within potentially suitable habitat (as determined by the biologist) inside and up to 500 feet from the demarcated disturbance limits. A passive relocation program may be implemented for observed BUOWs using occupied burrows pursuant to CDFW approval. The relocation of resident BUOWs shall be according to a relocation plan prepared by the biologist in consultation with and approved by CDFW. This plan shall provide for BUOW relocations to nearby suitable conserved lands possessing available nesting habitat and appropriate development -free buffers that are protected in perpetuity via conservation easements or other land preservation mechanisms. • The pedestrian protocol surveys shall include two early morning surveys between one hour before and two hours after sunrise, and two evening surveys between two hours before and one hour after sunset, via transects spaced to allow 100% visual coverage of the ground surface. The distance between transect center lines shall average approximately 100 feet, and may be reduced in places to account for differences in terrain, vegetation density, and ground surface visibility. b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, and regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or US Fish and Wildlife Service? Determination: No Impact. Refer to Impact 3.4(a), above. Generally, riparian habitat is defined as a vegetated ecosystem along a water body through which energy, materials, and water pass. Riparian areas characteristically have a high water table and are subject to periodic flooding and influence from the adjacent water body. These systems encompass wetlands, adjacent uplands, or some combination of these two landforms. Due to the project setting (and existing condition as a roadway), the potential for sensitive natural communities identified in local or regional plans, policies, and regulations or by the CDFW or USFWS is limited. No jurisdictional riparian/riverine areas are located within the proposed project footprint; however, riparian habitat may be present within the Wolf Valley Creek Channel located immediately north of the project site. It should be noted that the City of Temecula has elected to mitigate previous impacts to Wolf Valley Creek Channel related to the previously implemented May 2017 35 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening Pechanga Parkway improvements (generally from Temecula Parkway to Via Gilberto) through the restoration of a total of 3.4 acres of riparian habitat in Temecula Creek (BonTerra Consulting 2013). This five-year habitat mitigation maintenance program has been successful in achieving performance standards agreed upon by the CDFW and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps). Wolf Valley Creek Channel is artificially maintained, and is planted with ornamental grass. Although artificially created, Wolf Valley Creek Channel would likely be considered riparian/riverine habitat under the MSHCP. Pursuant to Section 6.1.2 of the MSHCP, any alteration or loss of riparian/riverine habitat that may occur with the proposed project would require mitigation in the form of preparation of a Determination of Biologically Equivalent or Superior Preservation (DBESP) to address the replacement of lost functions and values associated with Wolf Valley Creek Channel. This assessment is independent from considerations given to "waters of the U.S." and "waters of the State" under the CWA and the California Fish and Game Code. Based on current design plans, no impacts to Wolf Valley Creek Channel are anticipated with project implementation. If changes in the design plans result in any indirect or direct impacts to riparian habitat within the channel, the City would be required to reduce impacts through identification of appropriate mitigation measures and preparation of a DBESP to mitigate the loss of any riparian habitat. No impacts would occur in this regard. Additionally, under the federal Endangered Species Act (ESA), "Critical Habitat" refers to habitat or a specific geographic area that contains the elements and features that are essential for the survival and recovery of a listed species. In the event that a project may result in take or adverse modification to a species' designated Critical Habitat, a project proponent may be required to engage in suitable mitigation; however, consultation for impacts to Critical Habitat is only required when a project has a federal nexus (i.e. occurs on federal land, is issued federal permits [e.g. Corps Section 404 permit, or Corps Section 408 permit], or receives any other federal oversight or funding). The USFWS Critical Habitat mapper was used to locate the closest federally designated Critical Habitat to the project site which occurs approximately two miles east of the project site for coastal California gnatcatcher (Polioptila californica californica); refer also to Appendix B. The project site is not located within federally designated Critical Habitat. Therefore, no impacts to Critical Habitat would occur with project implementation. c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? Determination: No Impact. The Corps Regulatory Branch regulates discharge of dredge or fill materials into "waters of the United States" pursuant to Section 404 of the federal Clean Water Act (CWA) and Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act. Additionally, the CDFW regulates alterations to streambed and bank under Fish and Wildlife Code Sections 1600 et seq., and the Regional Water Quality Control Board (Regional Board) regulates discharges into surface waters pursuant to Section 401 of the CWA and the California Porter -Cologne Water Quality Control Act. No jurisdictional drainage features or isolated wetland features that would qualify as "waters of the United States" or "waters of the State" are located within the proposed project footprint; however, it should be noted that Wolf Valley Creek Channel is located immediately north of the project site. Wolf Valley Creek Channel receives flows from urban runoff and direct precipitation. Water in this channel flows from southeast to northwest, north of the project site, and eventually flows into Temecula Creek. Wolf Creek Valley Channel is primarily earthen -lined throughout most of its reach, with concrete and riprap armoring at the various road bridge crossings. The slopes of Wolf Valley Creek Channel are artificially maintained, and planted with ornamental grass. The Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 36 May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening active channel (low flow channel) of Wolf Valley Creek supports cattails (Typha sp.) and California bulrush (Schoenoplectus californicus). Although artificially created, Wolf Valley Creek Channel would likely be considered jurisdictional by the Corps, Regional Board, and CDFW. Based on current design plans, the proposed widening alignment would not impact Wolf Valley Creek Channel. The proposed improvements would occur within the limits of the roadway ROW and have been designed to largely avoid any potential direct impacts to the Wolf Valley Creek Channel; however, if during final design, impacts to Wolf Valley Creek Channel would occur, a formal jurisdictional delineation would be required to delineate the limits of jurisdiction and to determine the potential for impacts from project implementation. It is anticipated that any impacts to Wolf Valley Creek Channel would require a CWA Section 404 permit from the Corps, CWA Section 401 Water Quality Certification from the Regional Board, and a Section 1602 Streambed Alteration Agreement from CDFW. As currently designed, project construction and operation would not impact Wolf Valley Creek Channel or any other protected wetlands. No impact would occur in this regard. d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? Determination: Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. The Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA; 16 U.S. Code 703 through 711) is the domestic law that affirms, or implements, a commitment by the United States to four international conventions (with Canada, Mexico, Japan, and Russia) for the protection of a shared migratory bird resource. The MBTA makes it unlawful at any time, by any means, or in any manner to pursue, hunt, take, capture, or kill migratory birds. The law also applies to the removal of nests occupied by migratory birds during the breeding season. The MBTA makes it unlawful to take, pursue, molest, or disturb these species, their nests, or their eggs anywhere in the United States. The project site is located within a highly urbanized area in the City of Temecula. The existing roadway along the affected segment is four lanes in width, with a 40 mile -per -hour speed limit. Such conditions generally restrict or detract wildlife from crossing a roadway. Additionally, the proposed widening alignment is surrounded by existing development that has removed natural plant communities from the surrounding area. All adjacent lands are developed and do not support habitat that would generally support migratory wildlife with exception of the two parcels adjacent to the north which are presently undeveloped (but highly disturbed from prior grading and/or grubbing); refer to Exhibit 2, Local Vicinity Map. The proposed project would be confined to the existing paved roadway and landscaped areas. Additionally, the project site is not located within any MSHCP identified corridor or linkage. Therefore, no native resident, migratory fish, or wildlife species or established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors are present onsite or in the project vicinity. The project would not impede any use of native wildlife nursery sites or have an adverse effect on any migratory corridors or linkages in the surrounding area. Impacts in this regard are considered less than significant. As shown in Exhibit 2, a number of trees are present within the roadway ROW to the north and south of the affected roadway segment, as well as within the existing median. The ornamental plant communities adjacent to the proposed widening alignment have the potential to provide suitable nesting, foraging, and cover habitat for year-round and seasonal avian residents, and migrating songbirds that may be present in the area; however, no nesting birds or breeding behaviors were observed during the field survey conducted for the proposed project. However, avian species may be affected by short-term project construction -related noise levels during the nesting season for breeding birds (typically January through September annually) May 2017 37 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening which can result in the disruption of foraging, nesting, and reproductive activities. As such, project grading/construction activities during the nesting season for breeding birds protected by the MBTA and California Fish and Game Code could result in a significant temporary, indirect impact to these species. Mitigation Measure BIO -2 would require a pre -construction clearance survey for nesting birds and nest protection actions if active avian nests are identified within or 500 feet from the project site. With implementation of Mitigation Measure BIO -2, project implementation would not substantially interfere with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant with mitigation incorporated. MITIGATION MEASURES BIO -2 1. Within seven days prior to commencement of grading/construction activities, a qualified biologist shall perform a pre -construction survey within 500 feet from the proposed work limits. 2. If active avian nest(s) are discovered within or 500 feet from the work limits, a buffer shall be delineated around the active nest(s) measuring 300 feet for passerines and 500 feet for raptors. A qualified biologist shall monitor the nest(s) weekly after commencement of grading/construction to ensure that nesting behavior is not adversely affected by such activities. 3. If the qualified biologist determines that nesting behavior is adversely affected by grading/construction activities, then a noise mitigation program shall be implemented in consultation with CDFW, to allow such activities to proceed. Once the young have fledged and left the nest(s), then grading/construction activities may proceed within 300 feet (500 feet for raptor species) of the fledged nest(s). 4. Raptor nests are protected under Section 3503.5 of the California Fish and Game Code (California Law 2011) which makes it unlawful to take, possess, or destroy any birds in the orders Falconiformes or Strigiformes; or, to take, possess, or destroy the nests or eggs of any such birds. Consultation with CDFW shall be required prior to the removal of any raptor nest(s) observed during the preconstruction clearance surveys. e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? Determination: Less than Significant Impact. According to the City of Temecula Municipal Code, Section 8.48, Heritage Tree Ordinance, the City aims to protect and preserve heritage trees, specifically "oak, California bay laurel, California black walnut, California holly, and California sycamore trees, as well as other trees of special significance to the community." The Municipal Code defines heritage trees as any of the identified species [including, but not limited to, oaks (i.e. coast live oak, Engelman oak, valley oak, scrub oak), California sycamore, California Bay laurel, and California black walnut] that has been identified in a tree inventory in connection with the submittal of an application for a discretionary permit and that has reached the required diameter of a Heritage Tree. As stated above, a number of trees are present within the roadway ROW to the north and south of the affected roadway segment, as well as within the existing median. As such, some trees may Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 38 May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening 1) require removal or may be otherwise indirectly disturbed as the result of the proposed improvements; however, none of these trees are considered to be heritage trees. Any tree removal would occur in conformance with City requirements and would not conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance. Impacts would be less than significant in this regard. Conflict with the provisions of an adopted habitat conservation plan, natural community conservation plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan? Determination: No Impact. The City of Temecula and its Planning Area are located within the Western Riverside County MSHCP area; refer to City of Temecula General Plan EIR Figure 5.2, MSHCP Conservation Area. The MSHCP serves as a comprehensive, multi -jurisdictional HCP, pursuant to Section (a)(1)(b) of the federal Endangered Species Act (ESA). The plan encompasses all unincorporated County land west of the crest of the San Jacinto Mountains to the Orange County line, as well as the jurisdictional areas of the cities of Temecula, Murrieta, Lake Elsinore, Canyon Lake, Norco, Corona, Riverside, Moreno Valley, Banning, Beaumont, Calimesa, Perris, Hemet, and San Jacinto. The MSHCP is intended to protect and restore biological diversity and natural ecosystem processes that support such diversity, and to protect and restore natural habitat within western Riverside County known to support threatened, endangered, or key sensitive populations of plant and wildlife species.4 Core Areas within the MSHCP have been identified and represent lands with the right resources to provide live-in habitat and support the requirements of one or more species covered by the MSHCP. Criteria Areas support habitat adjoining the Core Areas, Non-contiguous Habitat Blocks, and Linkages. Species either live within these areas or travel through the area when moving from one area of conserved habitat to another. The Temecula Planning Area is partially located within subunits 1, 2, 5, and 6 of the MSHCP Southwest Area Plan. Each subunit of the Plan identifies conceptual MSHCP reserve designs, applicable cores and linkages, and biological issues and considerations. According to Figure 5.4-2, MSCHP Conservation Area, of the City's General Plan EIR, the project site is not located within the boundary of the MSCHP area or within a criteria cell; however, the project site does lie adjacent to a criteria cell located to the southwest (#7612) within which conservation efforts are concentrated in the western portion of the cell and include protection and enhancement of Riversidean alluvial fan sage scrub, riparian scrub, woodland and forest habitat along Pechanga Creek and adjacent chaparral, woodland, and forest habitat.' Implementation of the proposed project would not affect this criteria cell or conservation efforts/requirements within it. While the project site is located adjacent to a criteria cell (i.e. to the MSHCP Conservation Area) and would be subject to the Urban/Wildlands Interface Guidelines, the first quarter -mile of the criteria cell has been completely developed into a residential neighborhood, and the Urban/Wildlands Guidelines would not benefit the undeveloped portions of the Conservation Area. Additionally, as shown on General Plan EIR Figure 5.4-1, Critical Habitats for California Gnatcatcher and Quino Checkerspot Butterfly, the project site is not located within critical habitat for either of these species and thus will not require any consultation for adverse impacts to critical habitat. ° City of Temecula General Plan Update FEIR. Section 5.4, Biological Resources. 5 Western Riverside County MSHCP. Volume I, Section 3. htto://www.wrc- rca.org/GIS Online Mapping/MSHCP docs/AreaPlans/MSHCP%20Southwest°%20Area%2OCriteria%20Table.odf. Accessed November 4, 2016. May 2017 39 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening Riparian/Riverine Areas Under MSHCP Section 6.1.2, riparian/riverine areas are defined as areas dominated by trees, shrubs, persistent emergent plants, or emergent mosses and lichens which occur close to or are dependent upon nearby freshwater, or areas with freshwater flowing during all or a portion of the year. Conservation of these areas is intended to protect habitat that is essential to a number of listed, water -dependent amphibians, birds, fish, invertebrates, and plants. As stated above under Impact 3.4(a), if impacts to riparian/riverine habitat cannot be avoided, mitigation in the form of a Determination of Biologically Equivalent or Superior Preservation must be developed to address the replacement of lost functions of habitats in regards to the listed species. This assessment is independent from considerations given to "waters of the U.S." and "waters of the State" under the CWA and the California Fish and Game Code. No jurisdictional riparian/riverine areas are located within the proposed project footprint. As noted above under Impact 3.4(a), although artificially created, Wolf Valley Creek Channel would likely be considered riparian/riverine habitat under the MSHCP. Pursuant to Section 6.1.2 of the MSHCP, any alteration or loss of riparian/riverine habitat that may occur with project implementation would require preparation of a DBESP to ensure the replacement of any lost functions and values associated with Wolf Valley Creek Channel. Based on current design plans, no impacts to Wolf Valley Creek Channel are anticipated with project implementation, and no conflicts with the MSHCP would occur. Vernal Pools The MSHCP lists two general classes of soils known to be associated with special -status plant species: clay soils and Traver -Domino Willow association soils. The specific clay soils known to be associated with special -status species within the MSHCP plan area include Bosanko, Auld, Altamont, and Porterville series soils, whereas Traver -Domino Willows association includes saline - alkali soils largely located along floodplain areas of the San Jacinto River and Salt Creek. Without the appropriate soils to create the impermeable restrictive layer, none of the special -status species associated with vernal pools can occur on the project site. None of these soils are present on the project site. Since the proposed widening alignment would occur within the existing paved roads and landscaped areas, no undisturbed soils would be impacted. Therefore, no impacts to vernal pools or fairy shrimp habitat would occur with project implementation. Narrow Endemic Plant Species Based on a query of the RCIP Conservation Summary Report Generator and review of the MSHCP, it was determined that the proposed project is not located within the designated survey area for Narrow Endemic Plant Species as depicted in Figure 6-1 within Section 6.1.3 of the MSHCP; refer also to Appendix B. The proposed widening alignment would occur within the existing paved roadway and landscaped areas that do not provide suitable habitat for Narrow Endemic Plant Species. Urban/Wildlands Interface Guidelines According to the MSHCP, the Urban/Wildlands Interface Guidelines are intended to address indirect effects associated with new development in proximity to MSHCP Conservation Areas (MSHCP, p 6-42). The proposed project is not located in or immediately adjacent to any Criteria Cells or MSHCP Conservation Areas. Therefore, indirect project -related impacts to drainage, toxics, lighting, noise, invasive plant species, barriers, and grading/land development would not occur. Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 40 May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening Additional Survey Needs and Procedures The RCIP Conservation Summary Report Generator was queried to determine if the MSHCP lists any survey requirements for the project. The summary report identified that the project site is located in the designated survey area for burrowing owl as depicted in Figure 6-4 within Sections 6.3.2 of the MSHCP; however, no burrowing owl or sign (pellets, feathers, castings, or white wash) were observed during the habitat assessment. Due to the lack of burrowing owl sign and suitable burrows, burrowing owl are presumed not to occupy the project site and have a low potential to occur onsite. Further, as the proposed widening alignment would occur within the existing paved roadway and landscaped areas, burrowing owl are presumed absent, and no impacts to this species are anticipated; however, as stated above under Impact 3.4(a), a burrowing owl pre - construction clearance survey is required within seven days prior to ground disturbance, in accordance with the MSHCP, to ensure burrowing owl remain absent from the project site. Implementation of Mitigation Measure BIO -1 would reduce potential project impacts on burrowing owl in this regard to less than significant. Therefore, the proposed project would not conflict with the provisions of an adopted habitat conservation plan, natural community conservation plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan. No impact would occur. May 2017 41 InitialStudy/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening 3.5 CULTURAL RESOURCES 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES - Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to Section 15064.5? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? ❑ Q ❑ ❑ ❑ E 0 0 0 LJ 0 0 0 E 0 0 Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5? Determination: Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. A cultural resources assessment, including a site visit conducted on August 22, 2016, was prepared for the project (BCR Consulting 2016). Refer to Appendix C, Cultural Resources Assessment, for the full report. Historic resources generally consist of buildings, structures, improvements, and remnants associated with a significant historic event or person(s) and/or having a historically significant style, design, or achievement. Damage to or demolition of such resources is typically considered to be a significant impact. Impacts to historic resources can occur through direct impacts, such as destruction or removal, and through indirect impacts, such as a change in the setting of a historic resource. BCR Consulting conducted a records search at the Eastern Information Center (EIC) in August 2016, the local clearinghouse for cultural resource records. This archival research reviewed the status of all recorded historic and prehistoric cultural resources, and survey and excavation reports completed within one mile of the project site. Additional resources reviewed included the National Register of Historic Places, the California Register of Historical Resources, and documents and inventories published by the California Office of Historic Preservation. These include the lists of California Historical Landmarks, California Points of Historical Interest, Listing of National Register Properties, and Inventory of Historic Structures. The records search conducted at the EIC identified 27 cultural resource studies that have been conducted in the project area, four of which included the project site. The records search indicated that 26 cultural resources have been recorded within one mile of the project site. No cultural resources have been recorded within the project site boundaries; however, four cultural resources (including three prehistoric isolates and one prehistoric site with a historic component) have been recorded adjacent to the project site. A summary of the records search is included in Appendix C. Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 42 May 2017 Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES - Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to Section 15064.5? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? ❑ Q ❑ ❑ ❑ E 0 0 0 LJ 0 0 0 E 0 0 Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5? Determination: Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. A cultural resources assessment, including a site visit conducted on August 22, 2016, was prepared for the project (BCR Consulting 2016). Refer to Appendix C, Cultural Resources Assessment, for the full report. Historic resources generally consist of buildings, structures, improvements, and remnants associated with a significant historic event or person(s) and/or having a historically significant style, design, or achievement. Damage to or demolition of such resources is typically considered to be a significant impact. Impacts to historic resources can occur through direct impacts, such as destruction or removal, and through indirect impacts, such as a change in the setting of a historic resource. BCR Consulting conducted a records search at the Eastern Information Center (EIC) in August 2016, the local clearinghouse for cultural resource records. This archival research reviewed the status of all recorded historic and prehistoric cultural resources, and survey and excavation reports completed within one mile of the project site. Additional resources reviewed included the National Register of Historic Places, the California Register of Historical Resources, and documents and inventories published by the California Office of Historic Preservation. These include the lists of California Historical Landmarks, California Points of Historical Interest, Listing of National Register Properties, and Inventory of Historic Structures. The records search conducted at the EIC identified 27 cultural resource studies that have been conducted in the project area, four of which included the project site. The records search indicated that 26 cultural resources have been recorded within one mile of the project site. No cultural resources have been recorded within the project site boundaries; however, four cultural resources (including three prehistoric isolates and one prehistoric site with a historic component) have been recorded adjacent to the project site. A summary of the records search is included in Appendix C. Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 42 May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening A field survey was also conducted by BCR Consulting in August 2016. The survey did not record any historical resources, including historic -period buildings, within the project site boundaries. However, the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians has indicated that the project site is near the Luiseno Ancestral Origin Landscape Traditional Cultural Property, (National Park Service, National Register listing 14000851, posted on the NPS website under the week on November 28, 2014). The Origin Landscape is both a historic resource (as it is listed on both the National and California Registers), and a tribal cultural resource (TCR); refer to Section 3.17, Tribal Cultural Resources, below. As the Pechanga Tribe has identified Traditional Cultural Resources near the project site, Mitigation Measures CR -1 through CR -7 are proposed. Mitigation Measures CR -1 through CR -7 require the presence of an archaeological monitor and Pechanga Tribal monitor during all project -related ground disturbance activities. With adherence to Mitigation Measures CR -1 through CR -7, the project would not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in CEQA Guidelines Section 15064. No impact would occur in this regard. CR -1 CR -2 CR -3 CR -4 A professional archaeological monitor shall be present to monitor all ground - disturbing activities associated with the project. The archaeological monitor shall work under the direct supervision of a Cultural Resource Professional that meets the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualification Standards for Archaeology (U.S. Department of Interior, 2012) and as approved by the City of Temecula to provide archaeological expertise in carrying out all mitigation measures related to archaeological resources (Mitigation Measures CR -2, CR -3 and CR -5). The qualified archaeologist, or an archaeologist working under the direction of the qualified archaeologist, along with a representative designated by the Pechanga Tribe, shall conduct a pre -construction cultural resources worker sensitivity training to inform construction personnel of the types of cultural resources that may be encountered, and to bring awareness to personnel of actions to be taken in the event of a cultural resources discovery. The City shall ensure that construction personnel are made available for and attend the training and shall retain documentation demonstrating attendance. Prior to the start of ground -disturbing activities, the qualified archaeologist shall designate an archaeological monitor to observe ground -disturbing activities, including but not limited to, brush clearance and grubbing, grading, trenching, excavation, and the construction of fencing and access roads, in consultation with the Pechanga tribal monitor. If ground -disturbing activities occur simultaneously in two or more areas located more than 500 feet apart, additional archaeological monitors may be required. The archaeological monitor shall keep daily logs. After monitoring has been completed, the qualified archaeologist shall prepare a monitoring report that details the results of monitoring activities, which shall be submitted to the City, Pechanga Tribe, and to the EIC at the University of California, Riverside. At least 30 days prior to the start of any ground disturbing activity, the City shall contact the Pechanga Tribe of grading, excavation and the monitoring program, and to coordinate with the Pechanga Tribe to develop a Cultural Resources Treatment and Monitoring Agreement (Agreement). The Agreement shall address the treatment of known cultural resources; the designation, responsibilities, and participation of Pechanga Tribal monitors during grading, excavation and all ground disturbing activities; project grading and development scheduling; terms of compensation for May 2017 43 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening the monitors; and treatment and final disposition of any cultural resources, sacred sites, and human remains discovered on the site. The Pechanga Tribal monitor shall monitor observe ground -disturbing activities, including but not limited to, brush clearance and grubbing, grading, trenching, excavation, and the construction of fencing and access roads, in consultation with the archaeological monitor. If ground -disturbing activities occur simultaneously in two or more areas located more than 500 feet apart, additional archaeological monitors may be required. The Pechanga tribal monitor shall keep daily Togs. If ground -disturbing activities occur simultaneously in two or more locations, additional Pechanga tribal monitors may be required. CR -5 If inadvertent discoveries of subsurface archaeological/cultural resources are made during ground -disturbing activities, the applicant, the qualified archaeologist, and the Pechanga Tribe shall assess the significance of such resources and shall meet and confer regarding the mitigation for such resources. Pursuant to PRC Section 21083.2(b) avoidance is the preferred method of preservation for archaeological resources. PRC Section 21084.3 further requires that agencies shall avoid damaging effects to tribal cultural resources, if feasible. If the City, the qualified archaeologist, and the Pechanga Tribe cannot agree on the significance or the mitigation for such resources, these issues will be presented to the City Planning Director for decision. The City Planning Director shall make the determination based on the provisions of the CEQA with respect to archaeological resources and shall take into account the religious beliefs, customs, and practices of the Pechanga Tribe. Notwithstanding any other rights available under the law, the decision of the City Planning Director shall be appealable to the City Planning Commission and/or City Council. CR -6 The City shall relinquish ownership of all cultural resources, including sacred items, burial goods and all archaeological artifacts that are recovered as a result of project implementation to the Pechanga Tribe for proper treatment and disposition as outlined in the Agreement (Mitigation Measure CUL -4). CR -7 All sacred sites, should they be encountered within the project area, shall be avoided and preserved as the preferred mitigation, if feasible. b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5? Determination: Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. Archaeological sites are locations that contain resources associated with former human activities and may contain such resources as human skeletal remains, waste from tool manufacture, tool concentrations, and/or discoloration or accumulation of soil or food remains. The records search conducted at the EIC identified 27 cultural resource studies that have been conducted in the project area, four of which included the project site. Through such studies, 26 cultural resources have been recorded within one mile of the project site. No cultural resources have been recorded within the project site boundaries; however, four cultural resources (including three prehistoric isolates and one prehistoric site with a historic component) have been recorded adjacent to the project site. A summary of the records search is included in Appendix C. Although no known material cultural resources are present on the project site, the potential for unknown subsurface resources does exist, in particular due to the sensitivity of the area and previous identification of material resources. Further, the project is adjacent to a landscape (as Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 44 May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening discussed further below); however, given the existing roadway and minimal additional impacts from the project, the impact is considered to be Tess than significant, with the mitigation measures as outlined below. Therefore, project -related ground disturbing and construction activities would have the potential to adversely affect such unknown resources. To ensure that an adverse change in the significance of a cultural resource does not occur, Mitigation Measure CR -1 through CR -7 requires the presence of an archaeological monitor and Pechanga Tribal monitor during all project -related ground disturbance activities. With incorporation of Mitigation Measure CR -1 through CR -7, impacts would be reduced to less than significant. MITIGATION MEASURES CR -1 CR -2 CR -3 CR -4 CR -5 CR -6 CR -7 Refer to Impact 3.5(a), above. Refer to Impact 3.5(a), above. Refer to Impact 3.5(a), above. Refer to Impact 3.5(a), above. Refer to Impact 3.5(a), above. Refer to Impact 3.5(a), above. Refer to Impact 3.5(a), above. c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? Determination: Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. Paleontological resources are the preserved fossilized remains of plants and animals. Fossils and traces of fossils are preserved in sedimentary rock units, particularly fine- to medium -grained marine, lake, and stream deposits, such as limestone, siltstone, sandstone, or shale, and in ancient soils (paleosols). Such resources are also found in coarse-grained sediments, such as conglomerates or coarse alluvium sediments. Additionally, fossils are rarely preserved in igneous or metamorphic rock units. Fossils may occur throughout a sedimentary unit and are more likely to be preserved subsurface, where they have not been damaged or destroyed by previous ground disturbance, amateur collecting, or natural causes such as erosion. In contrast, archaeological and historic resources are often recognized by surface evidence of their presence. According to the City's General Plan EIR (Section 5.5, Cultural Resources), sedimentary rock units that contain significant fossil records dating back three million years are present within the Temecula Valley region. Portions of City's Planning Area are known to support archaeological and paleontological resources. Implementation of the City's General Plan will result in both new development on undeveloped lands, as well as infill development within focus areas located throughout the Planning Area. The General Plan Open Space Element identifies the goal to preserve or salvage potential archeological and paleontological resources with future development through discretionary review and mitigation monitoring, as well as to maintain an inventory of areas with known archaeological/paleontological sensitivity, and historic sites in the Planning Area; however, unknown paleontological resources may be unearthed during excavation and grading activities for specific projects. If previously undiscovered artifacts or remains are uncovered during excavation or construction activities, impacts would be considered significant. Mitigation Measure CR -8 requires the presence of an archaeological monitor during grading and specifies instructions in the event a paleontological resource is discovered. With implementation of Mitigation Measure CR -8, impacts to paleontological resources would be reduced to less than significant levels. May 2017 45 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening MITIGATION MEASURES CR -8 Prior to Grading Permit issuance and in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan Implementation Measure OS -26, Development Review Process, the City shall retain a qualified paleontologist to observe grading and deep excavation activities in areas where the probable presence of paleontological resources is identified. In the event that paleontological resources are inadvertently discovered during ground disturbing activities, the qualified paleontologist shall document the discovery as appropriate, evaluate the potential resource, and assess the significance of the find under the criteria set forth in CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5. If the fossil or fossil -bearing deposit are discovered during construction, excavations within 50 feet of the find shall be temporarily halted or diverted until the discovery is examined by the qualified paleontologist (in accordance with Society of Vertebrate Paleontology standards, Society of Vertebrate Paleontology, 1995). The paleontologist shall notify the appropriate agencies to determine procedures that would be followed before construction is allowed to resume at the location of the find. If the City determines that avoidance is not feasible, the paleontologist shall prepare an excavation plan for mitigating the effect of the Project on the qualities that make the resource significant (Paleontological Resources Mitigation Program). The Paleontological Resources Mitigation Program shall be submitted to the City for review and approval, prior to the resumption of grading activities at the location of the find. d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? Determination: Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. It is not anticipated that human remains or informal cemetery areas are present on the project site; however, ground -disturbing activities such as grading or excavation have the potential to disturb human remains. If human remains are found, those remains would require proper treatment, in accordance with applicable laws. California Public Resources Code Section 5097.98 and Health and Safety Code Sections 7050.5-7055 describe the general provisions regarding human remains, including the requirements if any human remains are accidentally discovered during project construction. As required by State law, procedures set forth in Section 5097.98 of the California Public Resources Code would be implemented, including notification of the County Coroner, notification of the Native American Heritage Commission, and consultation with the individual identified by the Native American Heritage Commission to be the "most likely descendant." If human remains are found during excavation, Mitigation Measure CR -9 requires that construction activities be halted in the vicinity of the find and any area that is reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent remains until the County Coroner has been notified, and the remains have been investigated, and if determined to be Native American, the appropriate state law process has been followed, and appropriate recommendations have been made for the treatment and disposition of such remains by the Most Likely Descendant. Compliance with existing State regulations, which detail the appropriate actions necessary in the event human remains are encountered, in addition to Mitigation Measure CR -9, would ensure that potential impacts on undiscovered human remains are less than significant. MITIGATION MEASURES CR -9 Consistent with State CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5, Subdivision (e), in the event of an accidental discovery or recognition of any human remains, the County Coroner Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 46 May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening shall be notified and construction activities at the affected work site shall be halted. Further, pursuant to PRC Section 5097.98(b) remains shall be left in place and free from disturbance until a final decision as to the treatment and disposition has been made. If the remains are found to be Native American, the County Coroner shall notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) within 24 hours. The NAHC shall immediately notify the most likely descendant(s) under Public Resources Code Section 5097.98, and the descendants must make recommendations or state their preference for treatment within 48 hours of being granted access to the site as identified in Agreement described in Mitigation Measure CR -4. May 2017 47 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening 3.6 GEOLOGY AND SOILS 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS -Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction? iv) Landslides? b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on - or offsite landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? ❑ 0 Q 0 O 0 Q 0 O 0 0 Q o Ei 0 0 o 0 IJ ❑ o 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. Determination: Less than Significant Impact. The City of Temecula, like the rest of Southern California, is located in a seismically active region as the result of being located near the active margin between the North American and Pacific tectonic plates. Several major faults exist in the region and have the potential to cause damage in the City. The project site is located within an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone (California Department of Conservation 1990). According to the City of Temecula's Geographic Information System, the most significant known active fault capable of seismic Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 48 May 2017 Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS -Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction? iv) Landslides? b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on - or offsite landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? ❑ 0 Q 0 O 0 Q 0 O 0 0 Q o Ei 0 0 o 0 IJ ❑ o 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. Determination: Less than Significant Impact. The City of Temecula, like the rest of Southern California, is located in a seismically active region as the result of being located near the active margin between the North American and Pacific tectonic plates. Several major faults exist in the region and have the potential to cause damage in the City. The project site is located within an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone (California Department of Conservation 1990). According to the City of Temecula's Geographic Information System, the most significant known active fault capable of seismic Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 48 May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening ground shaking that could impact the project vicinity is the Wolf Valley Fault, which bisects Pechanga Parkway at Casino Drive South. Additionally, the Elsinore Fault(s) trend northwest - southeast approximately 0.5 mile to the north and approximately 0.25 mile to the south. The Murrieta Creek Fault also parallels Pechanga Parkway approximately 0.25 mile to the south (City of Temecula Geographic Information System 2016). The project does not include habitable structures and is limited to the construction of roadway improvements and associated appurtenant aboveground structures (i.e. sound wall, storm drain, sewer and water, traffic signals, street lighting, raised median, and repaving activities). These improvements are not particularly at -risk to earthquake -induced damage, and would not substantially increase the potential for human loss, injury, or death as a result of fault rupture. Development of the proposed project would include minor grading and/or other ground - disturbing activities to allow for the proposed roadway improvements. Project compliance with applicable local seismic -related requirements would reduce the potential for impacts to occur from the exposure of people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects as the result of fault rupture. The City of Temecula has prepared the Engineering and Construction Manual (last amended January 2013) to define the administrative procedures and technical requirements necessary to implement the provisions of Temecula Municipal Code Title 18 (Construction, Grading, and Encroachment). The Engineering and Construction Manual provides detailed information to regulate construction, grading, and encroachment within public rights-of-way, including roadway design standards that would be applied to the proposed project. Project conformance with the design measures provided in the Engineering and Construction Manual, as well as any other applicable seismic -related requirements, would ensure that project impacts relative to potential rupture of a known earthquake fault remain less than significant. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? Determination: Less than Significant Impact. As discussed in Impact 3.6(a)(i) above, the project site is traversed by the Wolf Valley Fault and is in close proximity to the Elsinore Fault and Murrieta Creek Fault, all of which have the potential to result in strong seismic ground shaking. Therefore, the project site could be exposed to ground shaking during seismic events. Roadway installation and the design and engineering of the roadway would be required to comply with the all City requirements in place to shield infrastructure from the effects of seismic ground shaking, including those identified under the City of Temecula Engineering and Construction Manual, as well as the goals and policies outlined in the City of Temecula General Plan Public Safety Element. Additionally, all structures would be constructed in compliance with the existing seismic safety regulations of the California Uniform Building Code. As described above, the project does not involve the construction of aboveground habitable structures, and its implementation would not increase the potential for human loss, injury, or death. As such, impacts would be less than significant. iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction? Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Liquefaction and seismically -induced settlement or ground failure is generally related to strong seismic shaking events where the groundwater table occurs at a relatively shallow depth (generally within 50 feet of the ground surface) or where lands are underlain by loose, cohesionless deposits. Liquefaction generally results in the loss of shear strength of a soil, which occurs due to the increase of pore water pressure caused by the rearrangement of soil May 2017 49 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening particles induced by shaking or vibration. During liquefaction, soil strata typically behave similar to a heavy fluid. According to the City of Temecula Geographic Information System, and as shown on Figure 5.6-1, Seismic Hazards, of the City's General Plan EIR, the project site is highly susceptible to liquefaction. Due to the nature of the project, settlement as the result of liquefaction following a strong seismic event would likely be minimal. Placement and compaction of any fill material for the proposed structures must be performed in accordance with the City of Temecula grading standards and to the satisfaction of a qualified geotechnical engineer, as referenced in the updated geotechnical report; refer to Appendix D. In addition, the project would be required to comply with all applicable General Plan policies and local codes and regulations regulating the effects of liquefaction, including those identified under the City's Engineering and Construction Manual. The type of use proposed (roadway improvements) would not significantly expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving seismic ground failure. A less than significant impact would occur in this regard. iv) Landslides? Determination: No Impact. As shown on Figure 5.6-1 of the City of Temecula General Plan EIR, potential landslide conditions exist in the hillside areas of southwest Temecula with slopes greater that 15 percent. The proposed project site is not located in an area conducive to landslides, as described in the City of Temecula General Plan EIR. Further, the project does not propose the construction of buildings for human occupancy, and the relatively uniform topography of the site and adjacent land would not be conducive or prone to landslides. Therefore, no impact would occur. b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? Determination: Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. Soil erosion is most prevalent in unconsolidated alluvium and surficial soils and in areas that have slopes. The roadway improvements proposed under the project would occur in a generally flat area, thus the potential for substantial soil erosion would be minimal. Nonetheless, grading and trenching during the project's construction phase would displace soils and temporarily increase the potential for soils to be subject to wind and water erosion. Construction activities would include site mobilization, demolition, minor grading, installation activities (sound wall, storm drain, sewer and water, traffic signals, street lighting, raised median, sound wall), and repaving activities (repaving, striping). To reduce potential impacts related to the loss of topsoil, the project would be required to meet City of Temecula grading standards, as required. Further, the project would require preparation of a stormwater pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) for approval by the City prior to grading. The SWPPP would identify site-specific best management practices (BMPs) to be implemented with the project in order to prevent erosion, minimize siltation from impacting downstream water bodies, and protect water quality (Mitigation Measure GEO-1). In addition, construction of the proposed project would be required to demonstrate compliance with the recommendations outlined in the geotechnical report prepared for the proposed improvements; refer to Appendix D. In addition, grading operations, land -clearing, loading, stockpiling, landscaping, and construction haul routes would be required to comply with SCAQMD Rule 403, Fugitive Dust Emissions. Project implementation would occur in compliance with such plans and grading standards, and in Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 50 May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening accordance with the requirements of Mitigation Measure GEO-1. With such measures, project impacts with regard to soil erosion or the loss of topsoil would be less than significant. MITIGATION MEASURES GEO-1 Prior to commencement of any project grading activities, and in accordance with National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) requirements, the City of Temecula shall prepare a stormwater pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) for approval by the City's Public Works Department. The SWPPP shall include relevant best management practices (BMPs) in order to minimize soil erosion and water quality impacts during project construction. c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in an onsite or offsite landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse? Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Lateral spreading is a phenomenon in which large blocks of intact, non -liquefied soil move down a slope on a liquefied soil layer. Lateral spreading is often a regional event. For lateral spreading to occur, the liquefiable soil zone must be laterally continuous, unconstrained laterally, and free to move along sloping ground. Due to the nature of the proposed improvements, project installation is not anticipated to induce lateral spreading at the site. As noted above, while liquefaction risk is present on the project site, all improvements would be designed and constructed in conformance with the CBC seismic engineering standards, as well as with City of Temecula grading standards, as applicable. Although the roadway (and associated) improvements would be located within a designated Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone, the proposed project would not change the existing land use or include the provision of structures for human occupancy. As such, with implementation of the above-mentioned preventive measures that would be undertaken during project design, impacts associated with ground failure, including landslides, liquefaction, lateral spreading, and settlement, are considered to be less than significant with project compliance with the CBC and applicable local codes and construction standards. Refer also to Impacts 3.6(a)(ii) through 3.6(a)(iv), above, for additional discussion. With such measures, project impacts relative to unstable geologic units or soils would be less than significant. d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-8 of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Expansive soils are those that undergo volume changes as moisture content fluctuates, swelling substantially when wet or shrinking when dry. Soil expansion can damage structures by cracking foundations, causing settlement, and distorting structural elements. Project construction would be implemented based on the recommendations of a geotechnical engineer, as part of the final design process. Further, the project involves the construction of roadway infrastructure and does not include habitable structures that would increase the potential for substantial risk to life or property. As applicable, any import fill used would consist of granular materials with a "low" expansion potential (El of 50 or less) and would be tested by the project geologist prior to use to evaluate its suitability as fill material, consistent with the recommendations of the geotechnical report. Project conformance with such measures would ensure that impacts relative to expansive soils would be less than significant. May 2017 51 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration e) City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? Determination: No Impact. As a roadway improvement project, the installation of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems is not proposed, and wastewater disposal would not be required. No impact would occur. Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 52 May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening 3.7 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS 7. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS — Would the project: a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? ❑ ❑ ❑ Would the project: a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? Determination: Less than Significant Impact. There is scientific consensus that the contribution of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions into the atmosphere is resulting in the change of the global climate. The global average temperature is expected to increase relative to the 1986-2005 period by 0.3 to 4.8 degrees Celsius (°C) (0.5-8.6 degrees Fahrenheit [°F]) by the end of the twenty-first century (2081-2100), depending on future GHG emission scenarios (IPCC 2013). According to the California Natural Resources Agency, temperatures in California are projected to increase 2.7°F above 2000 averages by 2050 and, depending on emission levels, 4.1-8.6°F by 2100 (CNRA 2012). Physical conditions beyond average temperatures could be indirectly affected by the accumulation of GHG emissions. For example, changes in weather patterns resulting from increases in global average temperature are expected to result in a decreased volume of precipitation falling as snow in California and an overall reduction in snowpack in the Sierra Nevada. The Global Warming Solutions Act, also known as Assembly Bill (AB) 32, is a legal mandate requiring that Statewide GHG emissions be reduced to 1990 levels by 2020. Construction of the proposed project would generate GHG emissions. During project construction, GHGs would be emitted through the operation of construction equipment and from worker and vendor vehicles, each of which typically uses fossil -based fuels to operate. The combustion of fossil -based fuels creates GHG emissions such as carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and nitrous oxide (N20). Furthermore, CH4 is emitted during the fueling of heavy equipment. Addressing GHG generation impacts requires an agency to make a determination as to what constitutes a significant impact. The amendments to the CEQA Guidelines specifically allow lead agencies to determine thresholds of significance that illustrate the extent of an impact and are a basis from which to apply mitigation measures. This means that each agency is left to determine whether a project's GHG emissions will have a "significant" impact on the environment. The guidelines direct that agencies are to use "careful judgment" and "make a good -faith effort, based to the extent possible on scientific and factual data, to describe, calculate or estimate" the project's GHG emissions (14 California Code of Regulations Section 15064.4(a)). A number of expert agencies throughout the State have drafted or adopted varying threshold approaches and guidelines for analyzing operational GHG emissions in CEQA documents. The different thresholds include (1) compliance with a qualified GHG reduction strategy, (2) performance-based reductions, (3) numeric "bright -line" thresholds, and (4) efficiency -based May 2017 53 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Incorporated Less Than Significant ificant Impact No Impact 7. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS — Would the project: a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? ❑ ❑ ❑ Would the project: a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? Determination: Less than Significant Impact. There is scientific consensus that the contribution of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions into the atmosphere is resulting in the change of the global climate. The global average temperature is expected to increase relative to the 1986-2005 period by 0.3 to 4.8 degrees Celsius (°C) (0.5-8.6 degrees Fahrenheit [°F]) by the end of the twenty-first century (2081-2100), depending on future GHG emission scenarios (IPCC 2013). According to the California Natural Resources Agency, temperatures in California are projected to increase 2.7°F above 2000 averages by 2050 and, depending on emission levels, 4.1-8.6°F by 2100 (CNRA 2012). Physical conditions beyond average temperatures could be indirectly affected by the accumulation of GHG emissions. For example, changes in weather patterns resulting from increases in global average temperature are expected to result in a decreased volume of precipitation falling as snow in California and an overall reduction in snowpack in the Sierra Nevada. The Global Warming Solutions Act, also known as Assembly Bill (AB) 32, is a legal mandate requiring that Statewide GHG emissions be reduced to 1990 levels by 2020. Construction of the proposed project would generate GHG emissions. During project construction, GHGs would be emitted through the operation of construction equipment and from worker and vendor vehicles, each of which typically uses fossil -based fuels to operate. The combustion of fossil -based fuels creates GHG emissions such as carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and nitrous oxide (N20). Furthermore, CH4 is emitted during the fueling of heavy equipment. Addressing GHG generation impacts requires an agency to make a determination as to what constitutes a significant impact. The amendments to the CEQA Guidelines specifically allow lead agencies to determine thresholds of significance that illustrate the extent of an impact and are a basis from which to apply mitigation measures. This means that each agency is left to determine whether a project's GHG emissions will have a "significant" impact on the environment. The guidelines direct that agencies are to use "careful judgment" and "make a good -faith effort, based to the extent possible on scientific and factual data, to describe, calculate or estimate" the project's GHG emissions (14 California Code of Regulations Section 15064.4(a)). A number of expert agencies throughout the State have drafted or adopted varying threshold approaches and guidelines for analyzing operational GHG emissions in CEQA documents. The different thresholds include (1) compliance with a qualified GHG reduction strategy, (2) performance-based reductions, (3) numeric "bright -line" thresholds, and (4) efficiency -based May 2017 53 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening thresholds. The California Supreme Court decision in the Centers for Biological Diversity et al. v. California Department of Fish and Wildlife, the Newhall Land and Farming Company (November 30, 2015, Case No. S217763) confirmed that when an "agency chooses to rely completely on a single quantitative method to justify a no -significance finding, CEQA demands the agency research and document the quantitative parameters essential to that method." As noted earlier, AB 32 is a legal mandate requiring that statewide GHG emissions be reduced to 1990 levels by 2020. Efficiency -based thresholds represent the rate of emission reductions needed to achieve a fair share of California's GHG emissions reduction target established under AB 32. In adopting AB 32, the Legislature determined the necessary GHG reductions for the State to make in order to sufficiently offset its contribution to the cumulative climate change problem to reach 1990 levels. AB 32 is the only legally mandated requirement for the reduction of GHGs. As such, compliance with AB 32 is the current adopted basis upon which an agency can base its significance threshold for evaluating a project's GHG impacts; however, it is acknowledged that Executive Orders S-03-05 and B-30-15, Senate Bill (SB) 375, and the recently signed legislation of SB 32 will ultimately result in GHG emissions reduction targets for CEQA projects for years beyond 2020. The SCAQMD has not announced when staff is expecting to present a finalized version of its GHG thresholds to the governing board. On September 28, 2010, the SCAQMD recommended an interim screening level numeric "bright -line" threshold of 3,000 metric tons per year of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2eq)6 for all non -industrial projects. These efficiency -based thresholds were developed as part of the SCAQMD GHG CEQA Significance Threshold Working Group. This working group was formed to assist SCAQMD's efforts to develop a GHG significance threshold and is composed of a wide variety of stakeholders including the State Office of Planning and Research (OPR), CARB, the Attorney General's Office, a variety of city and county planning departments in the Basin, various utilities such as sanitation and power companies throughout the Basin, industry groups, and environmental and professional organizations. The numeric "bright line" was developed to be consistent with CEQA requirements for developing significance thresholds, is supported by substantial evidence, and provides guidance to CEQA practitioners with regard to determining whether GHG emissions from a proposed project are significant. Emissions resulting from implementation of the proposed project have been quantified and the quantified emissions are compared with the SCAQMD GHG threshold. The anticipated GHG emissions during project construction are shown in Table 3.7-1, Greenhouse Gas Emissions — Project Operations (Metric Tons per Year). Construction emissions are amortized over 30 years per SCAQMD guidance.' Table 3.7-1: Greenhouse Gas Emissions — Project Operations (Metric Tons per Year Emissions Source CO2eq Annual Roadway Construction emissions amortized over 30 years 2.2 SCAQMD Potentially Significant Impact Threshold 3,000 Exceed SCAQMD Threshold? No Source: CaIEEMod, version 2016.3.1. See Appendix A Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Data. 6 Carbon Dioxide Equivalent (CO2eq) — A metric measure used to compare the emissions from various greenhouse gases based upon their global warming potential. ' The project lifetime is based on the standard 30 -year assumption of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (South Coast Air Quality Management District, Minutes for the GHG CEQA Significance Threshold Stakeholder Working Group #13, August 26, 2009). Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 54 May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening Similar to the emission of criteria air pollutants discussed above, none of the components of the proposed project would include the provision of new permanent stationary or mobile sources of GHG emissions. Therefore, by its nature, the project would not generate quantifiable GHG emissions from long-term operations. The project does not propose any new buildings and therefore no permanent source of stationary source or energy source GHG emissions. In addition, once completed, the project would not result in a permanent increase in traffic. The proposed project would accommodate existing and predicted traffic demands and uphold the City of Temecula's goals to reduce traffic congestion, improve safety on roadways, and provide better access to regional transportation routes. The project would be designed to accommodate additional traffic volumes and would not directly generate new traffic or increase the number of vehicles along the roadway. Additionally, the project improves a non -motorized transportation option by providing a sidewalk for pedestrians. Traffic conditions after the project is constructed are expected to be the same as or slightly better than existing traffic conditions. Therefore, the project would not result in new permanent stationary or mobile sources of GHG emissions. As depicted in Table 3.7-1, GHG emissions projected to result from construction (amortized over 30 years per SCAQMD guidance) of the proposed project would not exceed the SCAQMD greenhouse gas threshold. The impact is therefore considered less than significant. b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Although the City of Temecula has not adopted a GHG reduction plan, the project would be below the SCAQMD's GHG threshold (see Impact 3.7(a) above). Furthermore, as previously mentioned, AB 32 is the legal mandate requiring that Statewide GHG emissions be reduced to 1990 levels by 2020. In addition, Statewide goals for GHG reductions in the years beyond 2020 have been recently codified into State law with the passage of Senate Bill (SB) 32. Signed into law on September 2016, SB 32 codifies the 2030 target in the recent Executive Order B 30 15 (40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030). The bill authorizes the State board to adopt an interim GHG emissions level target to be achieved by 2030. SB 32 states that the intent is for the Legislature and appropriate agencies to adopt complementary policies which ensure that the long-term emissions reductions advance specified criteria. At the time of writing this Initial Study, however, no specific policies or emissions reduction mechanisms have been established. SCAG's 2016-2040 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS), adopted April 7, 2016, is a long-range visioning plan that balances future mobility and housing needs with economic, environmental, and public health goals. The RTP/SCS embodies a collective vision for the region's future and is developed with input from local governments, county tra nsportation commissions, tribal governments, nonprofit organizations, businesses, and local stakeholders in Imperial, Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, and Ventura Counties. The RTP/SCS establishes GHG emissions goals for automobiles and light-duty trucks for 2020 and 2035, and establishes an overall GHG target for the region consistent with both the target date of AB 32 (2020) and the post -2020 GHG reduction goals of SB 32. The 2016 RTP/SCS contains over 4,000 transportation projects, including highway improvements, railroad grade separations, bicycle lanes, new transit hubs, and replacement bridges. These future investments were included in county plans developed by the six -county transportation commissions and seek to reduce traffic bottlenecks, improve the efficiency of the region's network, and expand mobility choices. The RTP/SCS is an important planning document for the region, allowing project sponsors to qualify for federal funding. In addition, the RTP/SCS is supported by a combination of May 2017 55 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening transportation and land use strategies that help the region achieve State GHG emission reduction goals and federal Clean Air Act requirements, preserve open space areas, improve public health and roadway safety, support the vital goods movement industry, and utilize resources more efficiently. The proposed project's consistency with the RTP/SCS goals is analyzed in detail in Table 3.7-2, Consistency with SCAG's Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy Goals. As shown, the project would not result in conflict with RTP/SCS goals. Table 3.7-2: Consistency with SCAG's Regional Transportation Plan/ Sustainable Communities Strategy Goals SCAG Goals Compliance with Goal GOAL 1: Align the plan investments and policies with improving regional economic development and competitiveness. Not Applicable: This is not a project -specific policy and is therefore not applicable. GOAL 2: Maximize mobility and accessibility for all people and goods in the region. Consistent: Improvements to the transportation network in Temecula are developed and maintained to meet the needs of local and regional transportation and to ensure efficient mobility. The objective of the proposed project is to widen Pechanga Parkway from a four lane (110 feet width) facility to six lanes (134 feet width) in order to accommodate existing and predicted traffic demands and uphold the City of Temecula's goals to reduce traffic congestion, improve safety on roadways, and provide better access to regional transportation routes. GOAL 3: Ensure travel safety and reliability for all people and goods in the region. Consistent: All modes of transit in Temecula are required to follow safety standards set by corresponding regulatory documents. Pedestrian walkways and bicycle routes must follow safety precautions and standards established by local (e.g., City of Temecula, County of Riverside) and regional (e.g., SCAG, Caltrans) agencies. Roadways for motorists must follow safety standards established for the local and regional plans. GOAL 4: Preserve and ensure a sustainable regional transportation system. Consistent: The objective of the proposed project is to widen Pechanga Parkway in order to accommodate existing and predicted traffic demands. All new roadway developments and improvements to the existing transportation network must be assessed with some level of traffic analysis (e.g., traffic assessments, traffic impact studies) to determine how the developments would impact existing traffic capacities and to determine the needs for improving future traffic capacities. GOAL 5: Maximize the productivity of our transportation system. Consistent: The local and regional transportation system would be improved and maintained to encourage efficiency and productivity. The City's Public Works Department oversees the improvement and maintenance of all aspects of the public right-of-way on an as -needed basis. GOAL 6: Protect the environment and health of our residents by improving air quality and encouraging active transportation (non -motorized transportation, such as bicycling and walking). Consistent: The City also strives to maximize the protection of the environment and improvement of air quality by encouraging and improving the use of the region's transportation system. The objective of the proposed project is to reduce traffic congestion, improve safety on roadways, and provide better access to regional transportation routes. GOAL 7: Actively encourage and create incentives for energy efficiency, where possible. Not Applicable: This is not a project -specific policy and is therefore not applicable GOAL 8: Encourage land use and growth patterns that facilitate transit and non motorized transportation. Consistent: See response to RTP/SCS Goal 6. Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 56 May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening Table 3.7-2, continued SCAG Goals Compliance with Goal Consistent: The City of Temecula monitors existing and newly constructed GOAL 9: Maximize the security of roadways and transit routes to determine the adequacy and safety of these our transportation system through systems. Other local and regional agencies (e.g., Riverside County Transportation Department, Caltrans, SCAG) work with the City to manage improved system monitoring, rapid recovery planning, and coordination with other security these systems. Security situations involving roadways and evacuations would be addressed in the County of Riverside's emergency management plans (e.g., Riverside County Operational Area Emergency Operations Plan) developed in agencies. accordance with the State and federal mandated emergency management regulations. Additionally, the City of Temecula Sustainability Plan was adopted in June 2010 to address sustainability and climate change goals. The Sustainability Plan incorporates several goals for reducing greenhouse gases, energy, and water use, planning intelligently for growth, reducing waste, and championing emerging technologies (Temecula 2010, p. 5). The proposed project would be required to demonstrate compliance with the applicable sustainability goals outlined in the Sustainability Plan in order to reduce the City's energy consumption and greenhouse gas production. In order to reduce energy use and promote clean energy production, the Sustainability Plan incorporates the following two goals which would be applicable to the proposed Project: • Reduce energy consumption throughout the community through the use of the latest technology, practices, and programs that support this goal • Support the use of clean energy throughout the community through use of the latest technology, practices, and programs In order to improve mobility throughout the community, the Sustainability Plan offers the following five goals which would be applicable to the proposed Project: • Create a flexible network of alternative modes of transportation • Distribute trip types among all modes of transportation (vehicle, transit, pedestrian, bicycle, etc.) • Maintain physical roadway condition along transit corridors • Improve the transportation system to better connect jobs, housing, schools, shopping and recreational uses As designed, the proposed Project would uphold the applicable Sustainability Goals identified in the Sustainability Plan. Compliance with these goals would ensure that the proposed project does not conflict with an adopted plan, policy, or regulation pertaining to GHGs. As such, the proposed project would not conflict with any applicable plans or policies adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions. Impacts would be less than significant. May 2017 57 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening 3.8 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS 8. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS - Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? g) ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ IJ ❑ ❑ 0 LJ 0 ❑ 0 ❑ IJ ❑ 0 0 0 ❑ 0 0 Q Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? Determination: Less than Significant Impact. The routine transport, use, and disposal of hazardous materials can result in hazards to the public through the potential for accidental release. Such hazards are typically associated with certain types of land uses, such as chemical manufacturing facilities, industrial processes, waste disposal, and storage and distribution facilities. Construction of the proposed project may result in temporary hazards related to transport and use of hazardous materials, including those used for construction vehicle use and maintenance (i.e., diesel fuel, motor oil, etc.). During project construction, contractors would be required to lnitial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 58 May 2017 Potentially Significant lm act P Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Im act p No Impact 8. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS - Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? g) ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ IJ ❑ ❑ 0 LJ 0 ❑ 0 ❑ IJ ❑ 0 0 0 ❑ 0 0 Q Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? Determination: Less than Significant Impact. The routine transport, use, and disposal of hazardous materials can result in hazards to the public through the potential for accidental release. Such hazards are typically associated with certain types of land uses, such as chemical manufacturing facilities, industrial processes, waste disposal, and storage and distribution facilities. Construction of the proposed project may result in temporary hazards related to transport and use of hazardous materials, including those used for construction vehicle use and maintenance (i.e., diesel fuel, motor oil, etc.). During project construction, contractors would be required to lnitial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 58 May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening uphold standard best management practices to ensure that all hazardous materials are stored, transported, and disposed of in accordance with federal and State law. Conformance with these standards would effectively avoid and minimize significant hazards related to the transport, use, and disposal of hazardous materials and would reduce the project's impacts to less than significant levels. Project operations (roadway corridor) would not involve a land use creating a significant hazard to the environment due to the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials. Operation of the roadway would be similar to that as occurs under existing conditions, but with improved traffic flows and reduced congestion, due to the addition of the two proposed travel lanes. As such, the project would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials. No significant operational impacts would occur. b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Refer to Impact 3.8(a), above. During the short-term excavation and construction period, there is the possibility of accidental release of hazardous substances such as spilling of petroleum-based fuels, lubricants, and other materials used for construction equipment. During construction of the proposed project, contractors would be required to use standard construction safety procedures and controls that would avoid and minimize the potential for accidental release of hazardous substances into the environment. Standard construction best management practices would be observed such that any hazardous materials released are appropriately contained and remediated as required by local, State, and federal law. Conformance with these standards would reduce impacts related to the accidental release of hazardous materials into the environment to less than significant levels. The proposed project would not alter any existing land uses along the affected segment of Pechanga Parkway. Therefore, following project implementation, the roadway would continue to operate as it presently does under current conditions, with exception of the additional travel lanes and other enhancements. The use of limited amounts of hazardous materials (i.e. maintenance vehicles and equipment, oil, gasoline, solvents, etc.) may be required during periodic maintenance activities, as needed; however, such activities would be temporary and typical of similar activities that currently occur along the roadway corridor. The proposed improvements would not result in long-term operational effects related to hazardous materials release. No long-term impacts would occur in this regard. c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Great Oak High School is located approximately 0.6 mile southeast; Helen Hunt Jackson Elementary School is located approximately 0.7 mile to the northeast; Temecula Luiseno Elementary School is located approximately 0.6 mile to the northwest; and, Erle Stanley Gardner Middle School is located approximately 0.4 mile to the north of the site. No schools are located within one-quarter mile of the project site. As stated in Impact 3.8(a), minor quantities of hazardous materials used during project construction would be subject to existing standard best management practices to ensure that all hazardous materials are stored, transported, used, and disposed of in accordance with federal and State law. Operation of the proposed project would not involve the routine use of hazardous May 2017 59 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening materials, and periodic roadway maintenance activities would only require the use of limited quantities of potentially hazardous materials on a short-term, temporary basis when needed. A less than significant impact would occur in this regard. d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? Determination: No Impact. Refer to Impact 3.8(b), above. According to the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (2016) EnviroStor database, there are no listed hazardous sites identified within, or immediately adjacent to, the affected roadway segment. The closest listed site(s) is the (former) Wolf Creek Elementary School and Wolf Creek Middle School, previously located approximately 0.4 mile to the north. No impacts would occur in this regard. e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? Determination: No Impact. French Valley Airport is a Riverside County -owned public -use airport located on State Route (SR) 79, north of Temecula in its sphere of influence, and adjacent to the City of Murrieta's eastern boundary. The Riverside County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan establishes policies applicable to land use compatibility planning in the vicinity of airports throughout Riverside County. The proposed project site is located approximately 7.5 miles southeast of French Valley Airport and is located beyond the French Valley Airport land use influence area. The project site is not located within any compatibility zones identified in the Riverside County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan. Further, as a roadway improvement project, the project does not propose the installation of aboveground structures that could represent a safety hazard to air traffic. Therefore, no impact would occur. For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? Determination: No Impact. According to the Federal Aviation Administration's (2016) airport database, the Billy Joe Airport (private airstrip) is located approximately 3.8 miles northeast of the project site. Due to distance from the project site, and the nature of the roadway improvements proposed (widening and traffic control, circulation, and utility installations), the airport would not be impacted by construction or operation of the proposed project. Therefore, no impact would occur. Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? Determination: Less than Significant Impact. While the proposed project will minimally impact traffic flow during the temporary construction period, it would not conflict with or interfere with emergency evacuation of the project area. Project construction would not substantially interfere with traffic circulation, as emergency access to Pechanga Parkway would be maintained during project construction. The overlying objective of the Pechanga Parkway Widening Project is to incorporate various improvements along Pechanga Parkway. The project would improve traffic flows along the affected corridor by enabling the roadway to accommodate additional vehicles and reducing traffic delays and congestion. As such, the proposed improvements may enhance the roadway's function as an emergency access route, if necessary. No revisions to an adopted emergency plan would be required as a result of the proposed project. Impacts in this regard would be less than significant. f) g) Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 60 May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Determination: Less than Significant Impact. As indicated in the City's General Plan EIR Hazards and Hazardous Materials section, undeveloped areas, such as in the eastern, southern, and southeastern portions of the Planning Area, have the highest fire danger, due to expansive areas of vegetation that may fuel wildfires. Any new development within the Planning Area would have the potential to expose additional people and structures to wildland fire hazards. The City has adopted the Hazardous Vegetation Ordinance (City of Temecula Municipal Code Title 8 Section 16) which requires every property owner to remove all hazardous or flammable vegetation on their property constituting a fire hazard that may endanger or damage neighboring property. In addition, the Temecula Fire Department and the County of Riverside Fire Department sponsor outreach and awareness programs to educate residents about fire dangers and what they can do to protect themselves and their homes. The General Plan Public Safety Element includes policies and implementation programs that direct the City to reduce the potential for wildfire by concentrating development in previously - developed areas where the risk of wildland fire is lower; to protect hillside areas from expansion of the urban-wildland interface; to encourage residents to plant and maintain drought -resistant, fire retardant landscape species on slopes to reduce the risk of brush fire and soil erosion; and, to work with the City Fire Department to control hazardous vegetation. The segment of Pechanga Parkway affected by the proposed project is generally surrounded by urban development; however, several large undeveloped parcels are present along the corridor to either side of Wolf Valley Road that may be susceptible to wildland or grassland fires. According to the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (2007) Fire and Resource Assessment Program (FRAP) map, the project site is located in an area designated as a local responsibility area (LRA). The City of Temecula Geographic Information System has designated the eastern portion of the project site and its surrounding areas as a high fire area, indicating that the risk for wildfire events to occur is considered to be high,' however, the project would not include the development of any new residential units or habitable structures that would be at risk to wildland fire. Additionally, the undeveloped parcels which border the corridor are subject to routine weed abatement activities in order to minimize their potential risk to wildland fire. Impacts would be less than significant in this regard. B City of Temecula Geographic Information System, High Fire GIS Layer. http://gis.citvoftemecula.org/Html5Viewer/?viewer=Citv0fremecula. Accessed October 20, 2016. May 2017 61 InitialStudy/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening 3.9 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY 9. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY -Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or offsite? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or offsite? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? g) Place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100 -year flood hazard area structures, which would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? o Q ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Er ❑ o ❑ LI ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Q ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 62 May 2017 Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 9. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY -Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or offsite? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or offsite? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? g) Place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100 -year flood hazard area structures, which would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? o Q ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Er ❑ o ❑ LI ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Q ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 62 May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? Determination: Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. Surface water quality is subject to federal, State, and local water quality requirements administered and enforced by the US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), the California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB), and the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) with cooperation from each county. The principal law governing pollution of the nation's surface waters is the Clean Water Act (formerly the Federal Water Pollution Control Act). Under the Clean Water Act, regulatory requirements for industrial and municipal dischargers were set, as well as requirements for states to adopt water quality standards. Further, the City of Temecula implements its Jurisdictional Runoff Management Plan (JRMP) which describes the City's urban runoff management programs implemented to comply with the requirements of the National Permit Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) MS4 Permit. The City of Temecula Storm Water Ordinance (City of Temecula Municipal Code Title 8.28) is also implemented to address water quality and outlines the City's NPDES requirements in accordance with the NPDES MS4 Permit. A Water Quality Management Plan was prepared to evaluate potential project effects on hydrology and water quality; refer to Appendix E, Proiect Specific Water Quality Management Plan, prepared by Michael Baker International (August 2016). Project implementation would result in ground disturbance from excavation and grading activities, thereby loosening onsite soils and increasing the potential for erosion and sedimentation deposition, as well as polluted runoff from the site, to occur. Water discharge from project construction may consist of oil and grease, trash, heavy metals, and pathogens, as well as other potential pollutants. These potential discharges can be of concern for development projects, as damage to downstream water bodies can occur. Regulation of discharges into these waters is the responsibility of the SWRCB. Additionally, the proposed project is required to comply with the latest adopted National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit. Compliance with the NPDES Permit would mitigate any project -level impacts to water quality to a level of less than significant. During the grading phase of the proposed project, potential runoff into the surrounding drainage system could cause sediment, oil, and other construction debris to contaminate downstream water bodies. The SWRCB has adopted General Permit number CAS000002-Waste Discharge Requirements for Discharges of Storm Water Runoff Associated with Construction Activity (General Permit). This permit applies to most construction -related runoff within the State. The General Permit requires that all grading permits for projects over one acre are required to submit a SWPPP that outlines Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on the project site to keep all sediment resulting from grading activities retained onsite. Prior to issuance of any grading or building permit, Mitigation Measure GEO-1 requires preparation and submittal of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) to the City's Public Works Department; refer also to Impact 3.6(b), above. Implementation of the SWPPP would reduce potential runoff and pollutants associated with project construction activities to the maximum extent feasible, thereby minimizing potential short-term water quality impacts. Additionally, in accordance with the Riverside County Drainage Area Management Plan (DAMP), City of Temecula Jurisdictional Runoff Management Plan for urban runoff management, and the City of Temecula Storm Water Ordinance, BMPs identified in the WQMP prepared for the project would be implemented during the post-construction/operation phase. The City would be required May 2017 63 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening to demonstrate compliance with each of the recommendations detailed in the study, and other such measure(s) the City deems necessary to reduce potential water quality impacts. With project conformance with applicable federal, State, and local regulations and requirements, as well as through project design and incorporation of the identified BMPs, the project would not violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements. Impacts would be less than significant with mitigation incorporated. MITIGATION MEASURES GEO-1 Refer to Impact 3.6(b) above. b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? Determination: Less than Significant Impact. According to the City's General Plan Open Space/Conservation Element, Rancho California Water District (RCWD) supplies most of the domestic and commercial water to Temecula, paid for by user fees. Water to supply the City is drawn from the Murrieta -Temecula groundwater basin and supplemented with imported water from the Metropolitan Water District (MWD). This aquifer is recharged by underflow, surface flow from the creeks in the area, and by direct precipitation in the valley. The General Plan indicates that in 2005, local groundwater provided 35 percent of the City's water supplies, with 26 percent of supplies being provided by local groundwater under future/buildout conditions. Other water sources include reclaimed water and untreated MWD water used for groundwater recharge. Public water service for the landscaped medians proposed with the project will continue to be provided by RCWD. As such, a portion of the water supply to serve the site would continue to (indirectly) come from local groundwater reserves. Project implementation would not require an increase in RCWD water supplies that would necessitate the provision of a "will serve" letter. As such, increased groundwater pumping would not occur with project implementation. Additionally, long-term operation and maintenance could have the potential to interfere with groundwater recharge, due to an increase in impervious surfaces with development of the proposed project; however, by minimizing the amount of grading and generally maintaining existing drainage patterns, the project would reduce potential adverse effects on local groundwater recharge. Design measures and BMPs would be implemented to ensure that stormwater runoff volumes from the site do not increase. Additionally, project compliance with existing agency regulatory programs, including General Plan goals and policies, would further reduce potential impacts on groundwater supplies. As such, project operations would not substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge, such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level results. Impacts would be less than significant. c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or offsite? Determination: Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. As indicated in the WQMP for the project, existing drainage patterns would be maintained with the project as designed, and therefore, the site does not disperse runoff to adjacent pervious Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 64 May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening area. As part of the proposed project, improvements would be made to the existing storm drain system to enhance the ability of the system to accommodate runoff during storm events. Construction impacts that may result in on- or offsite erosion or siltation would be minimized to less than significant levels by the implementation of BMPs set forth in the SWPPP (included as Mitigation Measure GEO-1); refer also to Impact 3.6(b), above. Operational impacts related to siltation or erosion would be minimized to less than significant levels by the development and use of standard stormwater drainage features. Therefore, the proposed project is not anticipated to alter the existing drainage pattern of the site and would not result in substantial erosion of siltation onsite or offsite. Impacts are considered to be less than significant with mitigation incorporated. MITIGATION MEASURES GEO-1 Refer to Impact 3.6(b) above. d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or offsite? Determination: Less than Significant Impact. The project site is relatively flat and includes existing paved surfaces associated with Pechanga Parkway. Refer to the response under Impact 3.8(c). The project would result in minimal alterations of the existing drainage pattern of the project site, and would not require traversing any streams or rivers. A less than significant impact related to on- and offsite flooding would occur. e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Refer to Impacts 3.9(a) and 3.9(c), above. The proposed project would result in increased impervious surface area, as the roadway would be widened along the approximate 3,500 foot - long segment. As designed, the project would not increase peak flow rates leaving the site, and discharge velocities would not be increased, as compared to existing conditions. The site is located immediately adjacent to an existing storm drain channel. The project would not cause flooding downstream, nor would it hydraulically impact onsite or downstream storm water infrastructure (runoff discharges to Wolf Valley Creek). Additionally, storm drain improvements are proposed with the project to ensure that such infrastructure can adequately continue to accommodate flows from the site and surrounding areas. Therefore, the project would not contribute runoff water that would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. Impacts would be less than significant. Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? Determination: Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. Refer to Impacts 3.9(a) and 3.9(e) above. With the implementation of BMPs, Mitigation Measure GEO-1, and compliance with established federal, State, and local regulations, the project would not substantially degrade water quality. Thus, a less than significant impact would occur. f) MITIGATION MEASURES GEO-1 Refer to Impact 3.6(b) above. May 2017 65 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration g) City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening Place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? Determination: No Impact. According to Figure 5.7-1, Flood Hazards and Dam Inundation Areas, of the City's General Plan EIR, the project site is not located within a 100 -year flood zone. As a roadway improvement project, the project would not involve the development of any new residential housing. Therefore, housing units would not be developed or placed within a 100 -year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map. No impact would occur. h) Place within a 100 -year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? Determination: No Impact. See Impact 3.9(g), above. The project site is not located within a 100 -year flood zone. No aboveground structures are proposed with the project. Therefore, implementation of the proposed project would not result in impacts relative to placing structures that would impede or redirect flood flows. No impact would occur. i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Refer to Impacts 3.9(g) and (h), above. In regard to levee or dam failure, the project site is downstream of three reservoirs - Lake Skinner (located approximately 8.5 miles to the north), Diamond Valley Lake Dam (located approximately 13.6 miles to the northeast), and Vail Lake (located approximately 7.5 miles to the northeast). According to Figure 5.7-1, Flood Hazards and Dam Inundation Areas, of the City's General Plan EIR, the project site is not located within a dam inundation area. i) While potential accidental release could impact the project site, as indicated in the City of Temecula General Plan EIR, with incorporation of State and federal regulations, in conjunction with the City of Temecula Multi -Hazard Functional Plan, such impacts would be less than significant. As such, with conformance to such measures, project impacts from flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam are considered to be less than significant. Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? Determination: No Impact. The proposed project site is located approximately 23.5 miles inland from the Pacific Ocean. Local large bodies of water, including Lake Skinner (located approximately 8.5 miles to the north), Diamond Valley Lake Dam (located approximately 13.6 miles to the northeast), and Vail Lake (located approximately 7.5 miles to the northeast), are also distanced from the project site. As such, the possibility for the occurrence of seiche or tsunami impacting the project area is considered to be remote. Further, the 3,500 foot -long affected segment of Pechanga Parkway is located within a generally flat area, and the risk of mudflows and seiche is considered to have a very low risk potential for damage. No impact would occur. Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 66 May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening 3.10 LAND USE AND PLANNING 10. LAND USE AND PLANNING - Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? Determination: No Impact. According to the City of Temecula General Plan, the parcels adjacent to the project site include Low Medium Density Residential (LM) and Specific Plan (SP) to the north; Tribal Trust Lands (TTL) and SP to the south; LM and TTL to the west; and SP to the east. According to the City of Temecula General Plan Land Use Map, the parcels adjacent to the project site are designated as LM to the north; LM and TTL to the south; LM and TTL to the west; and LM, Medium Density Residential (M), Neighborhood Commercial (NC), and Community Commercial (CC) to the east. The project site, which includes an approximately 3,500 foot segment of the existing roadway (Pechanga Parkway) between Via Gilberto and North Casino Drive, consists of improved road ROW, as well as pedestrian facilities and an existing flood control channel. There are a number of overhead and underground utilities which serve the surrounding area that are located within the existing road right of way. These utilities include a fiber optics cable, electrical utilities, gas, storm drain, sewer, recycled water and domestic water. A number of existing above -ground utility appurtenances (street lighting and signals) would be relocated during the project construction process. Additionally, the flood control facilities that run parallel to Pechanga Parkway would require modification to accommodate the widened roadway. Implementation of the project would in no way divide an established community. All roadway improvements would occur within existing Pechanga Parkway ROW, and no private property acquisition would be required. The project would result in the widening of the roadway and associated improvements for circulation purposes (i.e. median, sidewalk, etc.) within the public ROW. As indicated previously, the affected roadway segment is presently adjoined by a mixture of land uses including residential, commercial, and Tribal lands. The proposed increase in roadway capacity is anticipated to improve area circulation opportunities along Pechanga Parkway to further advance community connectivity. The project would add no additional barriers to any such barriers that may presently exist (i.e. vehicle speeds, multiple travel lanes with median, etc.). As such, the project would not divide an established community, and no impact would occur in this regard. b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or May 2017 67 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 10. LAND USE AND PLANNING - Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? Determination: No Impact. According to the City of Temecula General Plan, the parcels adjacent to the project site include Low Medium Density Residential (LM) and Specific Plan (SP) to the north; Tribal Trust Lands (TTL) and SP to the south; LM and TTL to the west; and SP to the east. According to the City of Temecula General Plan Land Use Map, the parcels adjacent to the project site are designated as LM to the north; LM and TTL to the south; LM and TTL to the west; and LM, Medium Density Residential (M), Neighborhood Commercial (NC), and Community Commercial (CC) to the east. The project site, which includes an approximately 3,500 foot segment of the existing roadway (Pechanga Parkway) between Via Gilberto and North Casino Drive, consists of improved road ROW, as well as pedestrian facilities and an existing flood control channel. There are a number of overhead and underground utilities which serve the surrounding area that are located within the existing road right of way. These utilities include a fiber optics cable, electrical utilities, gas, storm drain, sewer, recycled water and domestic water. A number of existing above -ground utility appurtenances (street lighting and signals) would be relocated during the project construction process. Additionally, the flood control facilities that run parallel to Pechanga Parkway would require modification to accommodate the widened roadway. Implementation of the project would in no way divide an established community. All roadway improvements would occur within existing Pechanga Parkway ROW, and no private property acquisition would be required. The project would result in the widening of the roadway and associated improvements for circulation purposes (i.e. median, sidewalk, etc.) within the public ROW. As indicated previously, the affected roadway segment is presently adjoined by a mixture of land uses including residential, commercial, and Tribal lands. The proposed increase in roadway capacity is anticipated to improve area circulation opportunities along Pechanga Parkway to further advance community connectivity. The project would add no additional barriers to any such barriers that may presently exist (i.e. vehicle speeds, multiple travel lanes with median, etc.). As such, the project would not divide an established community, and no impact would occur in this regard. b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or May 2017 67 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? Determination: Less than Significant Impact. As a roadway, Pechanga Parkway does not have a City of Temecula General Plan land use designation or zoning designation; however, project implementation would require an amendment to the City of Temecula General Plan Circulation Element in order to reflect the Pechanga Parkway's change from Major Arterial to Principal Arterial. As noted in Table 2.5-1, Required Permit Approvals, the City of Temecula would update the General Plan Circulation Element in order to reflect this roadway designation change as part of the project approval process. As such, project implementation would result in less than significant impacts related to conflicts with City of Temecula land use or zoning plans, policies, or regulations. The roadway widening activities proposed under the project could affect adjacent tribal trust land uses under the jurisdiction of the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians; however, any acquisition of easements related to this land would be subject to the regulations issued by the Bureau of Indian Affairs under 25 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 169. In compliance with 25 CFR 169, the City of Temecula would coordinate with the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians to identify the land requirements which would be affected through project implementation, survey the proposed acquisition, identify ownership, and appraise the property. Further, project implementation would benefit circulation opportunities for the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians and would improve accessibility to lands under the Tribe's jurisdiction. Therefore, the project is anticipated to result in a less than significant impact with regard to conflicts with an applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation. The project site does not include land area subject to specific plans or local coastal programs. No impacts would occur in this regard. c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? Determination: No Impact. Refer to Response 3.4(f) above. Project implementation would not affect areas under the jurisdiction of the Western Riverside County MSHCP or any other habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan. No impact would occur. Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 68 May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening 3.11 MINERAL RESOURCES 11. MINERAL RESOURCES —Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan? ❑ ❑ ❑ Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? Determination: Less than Significant Impact. The State Mining and Geology Board (SMGB) has established Mineral Resources Zones (MRZs) to designate lands that contain mineral deposits. The classifications used by the State to define MRZs are as follows: • MRZ-1: Areas where the available geologic information indicates no significant likelihood of significant mineral deposits. • MRZ-2a: Areas where the available geologic information indicates that there are significant mineral deposits. • MRZ-2b: Areas where the available geologic information indicates that there is a likelihood of significant mineral deposits. • MRZ-3a: Areas where the available geologic information indicates that mineral deposits exist, however, the significance of the deposit is undetermined. • MRZ-3b: Areas where the available geologic information indicates that mineral deposits are likely to exist, however, the significance of the deposit is undetermined. • MRZ-4: Areas where there is not enough information available to determine the presence of a known mineral deposit. The California State Geologist has classified areas into MRZs and Scientific Resource Zones (SRZs). The zones identify the Statewide or regional significance of mineral deposits based on the economic value of the deposits and accessibility. Within the Temecula Planning Area, the zoning classification of MRZ-3a has been applied. The MRZ-3 areas contain sedimentary deposits that have the potential to supply sand and gravel for concrete and crushed stone for aggregate; however, these areas are not considered to contain deposits of significant economic value, based on available data. Therefore, the project site is located in an area classified as MRZ-3a. Additionally, the State (California Department of Conservation 2015) has not identified the project site as having mineral resources that could be of value to the region and residents of the State. As such, a less than significant impact would occur. May 2017 69 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 11. MINERAL RESOURCES —Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan? ❑ ❑ ❑ Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? Determination: Less than Significant Impact. The State Mining and Geology Board (SMGB) has established Mineral Resources Zones (MRZs) to designate lands that contain mineral deposits. The classifications used by the State to define MRZs are as follows: • MRZ-1: Areas where the available geologic information indicates no significant likelihood of significant mineral deposits. • MRZ-2a: Areas where the available geologic information indicates that there are significant mineral deposits. • MRZ-2b: Areas where the available geologic information indicates that there is a likelihood of significant mineral deposits. • MRZ-3a: Areas where the available geologic information indicates that mineral deposits exist, however, the significance of the deposit is undetermined. • MRZ-3b: Areas where the available geologic information indicates that mineral deposits are likely to exist, however, the significance of the deposit is undetermined. • MRZ-4: Areas where there is not enough information available to determine the presence of a known mineral deposit. The California State Geologist has classified areas into MRZs and Scientific Resource Zones (SRZs). The zones identify the Statewide or regional significance of mineral deposits based on the economic value of the deposits and accessibility. Within the Temecula Planning Area, the zoning classification of MRZ-3a has been applied. The MRZ-3 areas contain sedimentary deposits that have the potential to supply sand and gravel for concrete and crushed stone for aggregate; however, these areas are not considered to contain deposits of significant economic value, based on available data. Therefore, the project site is located in an area classified as MRZ-3a. Additionally, the State (California Department of Conservation 2015) has not identified the project site as having mineral resources that could be of value to the region and residents of the State. As such, a less than significant impact would occur. May 2017 69 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan? Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Refer to Impact 3.11(a). As stated above, the City of Temecula General Plan designates the project site as MRZ-3a. The project is not forecasted to result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site. A less than significant impact would occur. Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 70 May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening 3.12 NOISE 12. NOISE — Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, exposure of people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, exposure of people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? o 0 0 0 o ❑ 0 0 o 0 IJ 0 o Q 0 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Noise Fundamentals Noise is generally defined as sound that is loud, disagreeable, or unexpected. The selection of a proper noise descriptor for a specific source is dependent on the spatial and temporal distribution, duration, and fluctuation of the noise. The noise descriptors most often encountered when dealing with traffic, community, and environmental noise include an overall frequency -weighted sound level in decibels that approximates the frequency response of the human ear (A -weighted decibels or dBA). Regarding increases in A -weighted noise levels (dBA), the following relationships should be noted for understanding this analysis: • Except in carefully controlled laboratory experiments, a change of 1 dBA cannot be perceived by humans. • Outside of the laboratory, a 3 dBA change is considered a just -perceivable difference. • A change in level of at least 5 dBA is required before any noticeable change in community response would be expected. An increase of 5 dBA is typically considered substantial. • A 10 dBA change is subjectively heard as an approximate doubling in loudness and would almost certainly cause an adverse change in community response (FICON 1992). Noise can be generated by a number of sources, including mobile sources, such as automobiles, trucks, and airplanes, and stationary sources, such as construction sites, machinery, and industrial operations. The rate depends on the ground surface and the number or type of objects between the noise source and May 2017 71 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 12. NOISE — Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, exposure of people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, exposure of people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? o 0 0 0 o ❑ 0 0 o 0 IJ 0 o Q 0 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Noise Fundamentals Noise is generally defined as sound that is loud, disagreeable, or unexpected. The selection of a proper noise descriptor for a specific source is dependent on the spatial and temporal distribution, duration, and fluctuation of the noise. The noise descriptors most often encountered when dealing with traffic, community, and environmental noise include an overall frequency -weighted sound level in decibels that approximates the frequency response of the human ear (A -weighted decibels or dBA). Regarding increases in A -weighted noise levels (dBA), the following relationships should be noted for understanding this analysis: • Except in carefully controlled laboratory experiments, a change of 1 dBA cannot be perceived by humans. • Outside of the laboratory, a 3 dBA change is considered a just -perceivable difference. • A change in level of at least 5 dBA is required before any noticeable change in community response would be expected. An increase of 5 dBA is typically considered substantial. • A 10 dBA change is subjectively heard as an approximate doubling in loudness and would almost certainly cause an adverse change in community response (FICON 1992). Noise can be generated by a number of sources, including mobile sources, such as automobiles, trucks, and airplanes, and stationary sources, such as construction sites, machinery, and industrial operations. The rate depends on the ground surface and the number or type of objects between the noise source and May 2017 71 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening the receiver. Mobile transportation sources, such as highways, and hard and flat surfaces, such as concrete or asphalt, have an attenuation rate of 3.0 dBA per doubling of distance. Soft surfaces, such as uneven or vegetated terrain, have an attenuation rate of about 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance from the source. Noise generated by stationary sources (i.e., construction) typically attenuates at a rate of approximately 6.0 to 7.5 dBA per doubling of distance from the source. Sound levels can be reduced by placing barriers between the noise source and the receiver. In general, barriers contribute to decreasing noise levels only when the structure breaks the "line of sight" between the source and the receiver. Buildings, concrete walls, and berms can all act as effective noise barriers. Wooden fences or broad areas of dense foliage can also reduce noise, but are less effective than solid barriers. Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? Determination: Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. It is difficult to specify noise levels that are generally acceptable to everyone; what is annoying to one person may be unnoticed by another. Standards may be based on documented complaints in response to documented noise levels, or based on studies of the ability of people to sleep, talk, or work under various noise conditions; however, all such studies recognize that individual responses vary considerably. Standards usually address the needs of the majority of the general population. Construction Noise Construction activities generally are temporary and have a short duration, resulting in periodic increases in the ambient noise environment. Construction of the proposed project would occur over approximately six months. Construction activities would include demolition, grading, paving, and roadway construction. Ground -borne noise and other types of construction -related noise impacts typically occur during the initial site preparation. This phase of construction has the potential to create the highest levels of noise; however, it is generally the shortest of all construction phases. Typical noise levels generated by construction equipment are shown in Table 3.12-1, Maximum Noise Levels Generated by Construction Equipment. Operating cycles for these types of construction equipment may involve one or two minutes of full power operation followed by three to four minutes at lower power settings. Other primary sources of acoustical disturbance would be due to random incidents, which would last less than one minute (such as dropping large pieces of equipment or the hydraulic movement of machinery lifts). Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 72 May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening Table 3.12-1: Maximum Noise Levels Generated by Construction Equipment Type of Equipment Acoustical Use Factor' Lmax at 50 Feet (dBA) Concrete Saw 20 90 Concrete Mixer Truck 40 79 Backhoe 40 78 Dozer 40 82 Excavator 40 81 Forklift 40 78 Paver 50 77 Roller 20 80 Tractor 40 84 Water Truck 40 80 Grader 40 85 General Industrial Equipment 50 85 Jackhammer 20 89 Note: 1. Acoustical Use Factor (percent): Estimates the fraction of time each piece of construction equipment is operating at full power (i.e., its loudest condition) during a construction operation. Source: Federal Highway Administration, Roadway Construction Noise Model (FHWA-HEP-05-054), January 2006. Sensitive uses closest to the project site include single-family residential communities directly adjacent to the project on either side of Pechanga Parkway. These sensitive uses may be exposed to elevated noise levels during project construction; however, as the project involves the widening of a roadway, construction noise would not be concentrated in one location for extended periods of time. Construction equipment would move in a linear fashion along the project area. Furthermore, the residential communities to the west of the project site are screened by noise - reducing sound walls, which can reduce traffic noise between approximately 3 to 5 dB (FHWA 2006). The residential communities to the east are screened by approximately 160 feet of buffer space in addition to noise -reducing sound walls. These residences would experience approximately 13.8 dB of sound reduction due to distance attenuation (considering a construction -noise attenuation rate of 6 dB per doubling distance as described above) and approximately 3 dB of attenuation due to the intervening sound wall (FHWA 2006). Construction noise in Temecula is regulated by City of Temecula Municipal Code Chapter 9.20, which identifies standards, specific noise restrictions, exemptions, and variances for sources of noise in the city. Section 9.20.60 establishes additional standards for various noise sources. Specifically, Section 9.20.60(D) restricts construction activity such that no person may engage in or conduct construction activity when the construction site is within one-quarter mile of an occupied residence, between the hours of 6:30 PM and 7:00 AM, Monday through Friday, and may only engage in or conduct construction activity between the hours of 7:00 AM and 6:30 PM. on Saturday. The Municipal Code section prohibits construction activity on Sundays and nationally recognized holidays. The proposed project would be required to comply with the construction time limitations identified in Section 9.20.60 of the Temecula Municipal Code. Due to the temporary nature of construction, coupled with the fact that construction -related noise is a generally accepted reality in urbanized environments, the City of Temecula does not promulgate standards for construction -generated noise. Adherence to the permitted hours of construction are required in recognition that construction activities undertaken during daytime hours are a typical part of living in an urban environment and do not cause a significant disruption. Implementation of Mitigation Measure NOI-1 would ensure that project construction complies with allowable hours for construction noise and requires construction equipment to be equipped May 2017 73 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening with properly operating and maintained mufflers and other State required noise attenuation devices to further minimize impacts. Thus, a less than significant noise impact would result from construction activities. MITIGATION MEASURES NOI-1 Prior to initiation of construction, the City of Temecula shall ensure that the following measures are incorporated into construction contract documents: • All construction equipment, fixed, or mobile, shall be equipped with properly operating and maintained mufflers and other State required noise attenuation devices. • A construction notice shall be mailed to residents within a 150 -foot radius of the project and shall indicate the dates and duration of construction activities, as well as provide a contact name and a telephone number where residents can inquire about the construction process and register complaints. • All construction, maintenance, or demolition activities associated with the proposed project shall be limited to the hours between 7:00 AM and 6:30 PM Mondays — Saturdays. All construction on Sundays and National holidays shall be prohibited. • Construction haul routes shall be designed to avoid noise sensitive uses (e.g., residences, convalescent homes, etc.). • During construction, stationary construction equipment shall be placed such that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive noise receivers. • Construction equipment staging areas shall be located away from adjacent sensitive receptors. Operational Noise The proposed project would not introduce a new noise -generating source. The project would accommodate existing and predicted traffic demands and uphold the City of Temecula's goals to reduce traffic congestion, improve safety on roadways, and provide better access to regional transportation routes. Due to the expansion of the Pechanga Resort & Casino and continued residential development along Pechanga Parkway, additional roadway capacity to meet existing and future needs has been identified. In response to high traffic volumes, the proposed project would continue the 2009 Pechanga Parkway Phase II improvements. Although the project would be designed to accommodate additional traffic volumes, the proposed improvements would not directly generate new traffic or increase the number of vehicles along the roadway. Furthermore, as previously described, a 3 dBA change in the existing ambient noise level is required in order to instigate a perceivable/noticeable difference in the ambient noise environment. According to the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Technical Noise Supplement to the Traffic Noise Analysis Protocol (2013), a doubling of traffic on a roadway is required in order to result in an increase of 3 dB (a barely perceptible increase). The proposed widening of Pechanga Parkway from four lanes to six lanes would not accommodate a doubling of existing traffic, and thus, would not result in a perceptible increase traffic noise levels. The Project would also include the installation of a noise -reducing sound wall which would further minimize operational traffic noise. Lastly, Section 9.20.60 of the City of Temecula Municipal Code exempts motor vehicles, other than off-highway vehicles, from City noise standards (this exemption does not include sound Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 74 May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening emanating from motor vehicle sound systems). A less than significant impact would occur in this regard. b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Project construction would have the potential to result in varying degrees of temporary groundborne vibration, depending on the specific construction equipment used and the operations involved. Vibration generated by construction equipment spreads through the ground and diminishes in magnitude with increases in distance. This impact discussion utilizes Caltrans' recommended standard of 0.2 inches per second (in/sec) peak particle velocity with respect to the prevention of structural damage for normal buildings. The nearest residential structures to the project site are located to the west of the project site at approximately 25 feet; however, it is acknowledged that construction activities would occur throughout the project site and would not be concentrated at the point closest to the sensitive receptors. Table 3.12-2 Typical Construction Equipment Vibration Levels, displays vibration levels for typical construction equipment. Table 3.12-2: Typical Construction Equipment Vibration Levels Equipment Peak Particle Velocity at 25 Feet (inches/second) Large Bulldozer 0.089 Caisson Drilling 0.089 Loaded Trucks 0.076 Rock Breaker 0.059 Jackhammer 0.035 Small Bulldozer/Tractors 0.003 Source: Federal Transit Administration, Transit Noise and V'bration Impact Assessment Guidelines, May 2006. Table 12-2; Caltrans (California Department of Transportation), Transportation- and Construction -Induced Vibration Guidance Manual, 2004. Based on the vibration levels presented in Table 3.12-2, ground vibration generated by heavy- duty equipment would not be anticipated to exceed approximately 0.089 in/sec peak particle velocity at 25 feet. Therefore, the use of virtually any type of construction equipment would most likely not result in a groundborne vibration velocity level above 0.2 in/sec and predicted vibration levels at the nearest off-site structures would not exceed recommended criteria. Additionally, this would be a temporary impact and would cease completely when construction ends. Once operational, the project would not be a source of groundborne vibration. Impacts would be less than significant. c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Refer to Impact 3.12(a). The proposed project would accommodate existing and predicted traffic demands and uphold the City of Temecula's goals to reduce traffic congestion, improve roadway safety, and provide better access to regional transportation routes. The project would be designed to accommodate additional traffic volumes and would not directly generate new traffic or increase the number of vehicles along the roadway. The proposed widening of Pechanga Parkway would not result in a perceptible increase traffic noise levels. Long-term noise generated by the addition of two travel lanes in order to widen Pechanga Parkway from four lanes to six lanes would be less than significant. May 2017 75 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? Determination: Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. Refer to Impact 3.12(a). e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, exposure of people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Determination: No Impact. The nearest airport to the project site is the Billy Joe Airport (private), located approximately 3.6 3.8 miles to the northeast. The nearest public airport to the project site is the French Valley Airport, located approximately 7.5 miles north. The proposed project is not located within an airport land use plan. Further, there is no public airport, public use airport, or private airstrip located within 2 miles of the project site. Therefore, no impacts would occur in this regard. For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, exposure of people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Determination: No Impact. Refer to Impact 3.12(e). No impacts would occur in this regard. f) Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 76 May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening 3.13 POPULATION AND HOUSING 13. POPULATION AND HOUSING - Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? Determination: Less than Significant Impact. The City of Temecula's General Plan Land Use Element provides capacity for a population of 113,421 within the current City limits in 2025 (existing population of 106,289 as of 20149). If buildout is achieved by 2025, development pursuant to the General Plan would result in a population increase of approximately four percent per year, based upon planned land uses - specifically, new housing units. As a roadway improvement project, the proposed project would not directly induce area population growth through the introduction of new residential housing. No housing or commercial businesses are associated with project development. The proposed roadway widening is not anticipated to significantly induce area growth, due to the nature of the improvements proposed. The affected segment of Pechanga Parkway is an existing transportation facility surrounded by existing residential, commercial, and other land uses. Pechanga Parkway functions as a primary north -south arterial for the southern portion of the City of Temecula circulation network. In response to high traffic volumes, the proposed project would continue the 2009 Pechanga Parkway Phase II improvements which widened Pechanga Parkway to a six -lane facility from State Route 79 South (Temecula Parkway) to Via Gilberto and a four -lane facility from Via Gilberto to Wolf Valley Road. No roadway extensions would occur, just the addition of two new travel lanes (and associated improvements) to accommodate existing and anticipated vehicular traffic and relieve congestion along the corridor. As such, the project is not anticipated to induce substantial population growth in the area, either indirectly or directly. A Tess than significant impact would occur in this regard. 9 ESA, Altair Specific Plan Draft Environmental Impact Report, page 3.11-6, prepared for the City of Temecula, May 2016. May 2017 77 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 13. POPULATION AND HOUSING - Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? Determination: Less than Significant Impact. The City of Temecula's General Plan Land Use Element provides capacity for a population of 113,421 within the current City limits in 2025 (existing population of 106,289 as of 20149). If buildout is achieved by 2025, development pursuant to the General Plan would result in a population increase of approximately four percent per year, based upon planned land uses - specifically, new housing units. As a roadway improvement project, the proposed project would not directly induce area population growth through the introduction of new residential housing. No housing or commercial businesses are associated with project development. The proposed roadway widening is not anticipated to significantly induce area growth, due to the nature of the improvements proposed. The affected segment of Pechanga Parkway is an existing transportation facility surrounded by existing residential, commercial, and other land uses. Pechanga Parkway functions as a primary north -south arterial for the southern portion of the City of Temecula circulation network. In response to high traffic volumes, the proposed project would continue the 2009 Pechanga Parkway Phase II improvements which widened Pechanga Parkway to a six -lane facility from State Route 79 South (Temecula Parkway) to Via Gilberto and a four -lane facility from Via Gilberto to Wolf Valley Road. No roadway extensions would occur, just the addition of two new travel lanes (and associated improvements) to accommodate existing and anticipated vehicular traffic and relieve congestion along the corridor. As such, the project is not anticipated to induce substantial population growth in the area, either indirectly or directly. A Tess than significant impact would occur in this regard. 9 ESA, Altair Specific Plan Draft Environmental Impact Report, page 3.11-6, prepared for the City of Temecula, May 2016. May 2017 77 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Determination: No Impact. No housing units would be displaced as a result of project construction. Existing residential land uses are present in the project vicinity. All project improvements would occur within the existing Pechanga Parkway roadway ROW, and as such, would not displace any existing housing units or require the construction of additional replacement housing units elsewhere. Therefore, no impact would occur in this regard. c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Determination: No Impact. Refer to Impact 3.13(b), above. No residential units or residents would be displaced as a result of the project as proposed, and therefore, the project would not necessitate the construction of replacement housing elsewhere. No impact would occur in this regard. Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 78 May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening 3.14 PUBLIC SERVICES 14. PUBLIC SERVICES a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? Police protection? Schools? Parks? Other public facilities? ❑ ❑ Q ❑ ❑ ❑ IJ �0 o 0 0 IJ o 0 0 0 O 0 ❑ 0 a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives for any of the public services: 1) Fire protection? Determination: Less than Significant Impact. The proposed project would not result in the construction of any aboveground structures and would not directly or indirectly induce significant population growth (refer to Impact 3.13(a), above). As a roadway improvement project, the proposed improvements would not result in the need for additional new or altered fire protection services and would not alter acceptable service ratios or response times. As a roadway improvement project, project implementation would not create new demand for the development of new or physically altered fire protection services or facilities. The project would result in a Tong -term benefit to fire service response times, as its implementation would improve the flow of traffic along Pechanga Parkway, thereby relieving traffic congestion and improving the movement of emergency vehicles. Therefore, a less than significant impact would occur. 2) Police protection? Determination: Less than Significant Impact. The proposed project would not directly or indirectly induce significant population growth, as identified in Impact 3.13(a) above. The project would not result in the need for additional new or altered police protection services and would not alter acceptable service ratios or response times. Further, project implementation would not create the need for the development of additional police facilities. The project would result in a Tong -term benefit to police service response times, as its implementation would improve the flow of traffic along Pechanga Parkway and ease traffic congestion. Therefore, impacts on police protection services with project implementation would be less than significant. May 2017 79 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 14. PUBLIC SERVICES a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? Police protection? Schools? Parks? Other public facilities? ❑ ❑ Q ❑ ❑ ❑ IJ �0 o 0 0 IJ o 0 0 0 O 0 ❑ 0 a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives for any of the public services: 1) Fire protection? Determination: Less than Significant Impact. The proposed project would not result in the construction of any aboveground structures and would not directly or indirectly induce significant population growth (refer to Impact 3.13(a), above). As a roadway improvement project, the proposed improvements would not result in the need for additional new or altered fire protection services and would not alter acceptable service ratios or response times. As a roadway improvement project, project implementation would not create new demand for the development of new or physically altered fire protection services or facilities. The project would result in a Tong -term benefit to fire service response times, as its implementation would improve the flow of traffic along Pechanga Parkway, thereby relieving traffic congestion and improving the movement of emergency vehicles. Therefore, a less than significant impact would occur. 2) Police protection? Determination: Less than Significant Impact. The proposed project would not directly or indirectly induce significant population growth, as identified in Impact 3.13(a) above. The project would not result in the need for additional new or altered police protection services and would not alter acceptable service ratios or response times. Further, project implementation would not create the need for the development of additional police facilities. The project would result in a Tong -term benefit to police service response times, as its implementation would improve the flow of traffic along Pechanga Parkway and ease traffic congestion. Therefore, impacts on police protection services with project implementation would be less than significant. May 2017 79 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening 3) Schools? Determination: No Impact. As identified in Impact 3.13(a), above, the proposed project would not involve a land use that would directly or indirectly induce significant population growth. Therefore, the project would not generate additional school -aged students that would create new demand on local schools for educational services. No impact would occur in this regard. 4) Parks? Determination: No Impact. Due to the nature of the project, no new residents would be generated that would be likely to impact or create a need for additional local parks or other public facilities. No impact would occur in this regard. 5) Other public facilities? Determination: No Impact. Refer also to Impact 3.13(a), above. The proposed project would not induce significant population growth within the area, either directly or indirectly, and therefore would not create new demand for other public facilities (i.e., libraries). Therefore, the project would not create significant impacts on other public facilities. No impact would occur in this regard. Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 80 May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening 3.15 RECREATION 15. RECREATION a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? Determination: No Impact. Refer to Impact 3.14(a)(4), above. The proposed project consists of a roadway widening and associated improvements, and as such, its implementation would not induce area population growth or increase demand for or use of existing local or regional park facilities. For this reason, the project would have no impact on the local and regional parks system. b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Determination: No Impact. Refer to Impact 3.14(a)(4), above. As a roadway improvement project, the proposed project does not include construction of any recreational facilities, nor would it generate additional area population that would require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities. No impact would occur in this regard. May 2017 81 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 15. RECREATION a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? Determination: No Impact. Refer to Impact 3.14(a)(4), above. The proposed project consists of a roadway widening and associated improvements, and as such, its implementation would not induce area population growth or increase demand for or use of existing local or regional park facilities. For this reason, the project would have no impact on the local and regional parks system. b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Determination: No Impact. Refer to Impact 3.14(a)(4), above. As a roadway improvement project, the proposed project does not include construction of any recreational facilities, nor would it generate additional area population that would require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities. No impact would occur in this regard. May 2017 81 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening 3.16 TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC 16. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC— Would the project: a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance, or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non -motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to, level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads and highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities? o 0 0 Er O 0 Q 0 o 0 0 0 Would the project: a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance, or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non -motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? Determination: Less than Significant Impact. The objective of the proposed project is to widen Pechanga Parkway from a four lane (110 -foot width) facility to six lanes (134 -foot width) generally between Via Gilberto and North Casino Drive in order to accommodate existing and predicted traffic demands and uphold the City of Temecula's goals to reduce traffic congestion, improve roadway safety, and provide better access to regional transportation routes. Due to the expansion of the Pechanga Resort & Casino and continued residential development along Pechanga Parkway, the need for additional roadway capacity to meet existing and future needs was identified. Pechanga Parkway functions as a primary north -south arterial for the southern portion of the City of Temecula circulation network. In response to high traffic volumes, the proposed project would continue the 2009 Pechanga Parkway Phase II improvements which widened Pechanga Parkway to a six -lane facility from State Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 82 May 2017 Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 16. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC— Would the project: a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance, or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non -motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to, level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads and highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities? o 0 0 Er O 0 Q 0 o 0 0 0 Would the project: a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance, or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non -motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? Determination: Less than Significant Impact. The objective of the proposed project is to widen Pechanga Parkway from a four lane (110 -foot width) facility to six lanes (134 -foot width) generally between Via Gilberto and North Casino Drive in order to accommodate existing and predicted traffic demands and uphold the City of Temecula's goals to reduce traffic congestion, improve roadway safety, and provide better access to regional transportation routes. Due to the expansion of the Pechanga Resort & Casino and continued residential development along Pechanga Parkway, the need for additional roadway capacity to meet existing and future needs was identified. Pechanga Parkway functions as a primary north -south arterial for the southern portion of the City of Temecula circulation network. In response to high traffic volumes, the proposed project would continue the 2009 Pechanga Parkway Phase II improvements which widened Pechanga Parkway to a six -lane facility from State Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 82 May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening Route 79 South (Temecula Parkway) to Via Gilberto and a four -lane facility from Via Gilberto to Wolf Valley Road. Although the project would be designed to accommodate additional traffic volumes, the proposed improvements would not directly generate new traffic or increase the number of vehicles along the roadway. Additionally, as the roadway widening would reduce congestion, the project would not conflict with (i.e. lower) an established measure of effectiveness for performance of the system (i.e. level of service), and instead would improve conditions along the roadway, allowing for improved traffic flows and circulation. For the reasons above, the project would not conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance, or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the affected circulation system. Impacts would be less than significant. b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to, level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads and highways? Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Refer to Impact 3.16(a), above. The Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) implements its Regional Transportation Plan (RTP), which is a multi -modal, long-range planning document. The RTP identifies programs and policies for congestion management, transit, bicycles and pedestrians, roadways, freight, and financing. Each agency responsible for building and managing transportation facilities, including the City of Temecula, has implementation responsibilities under the RTP. The RTP relies on local plans and policies governing circulation and transportation to identify the region's future multi -modal transportation system. Additionally, the County of Riverside, the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC), and SCAG have undertaken the County Integrated Project (RCIP) which produced three interrelated plans: a Riverside County General Plan for land use and housing, a Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) to determine open spaces and conservation areas, and the Community and Environmental Transportation Acceptability Process (CETAP), which identifies improvements for highways and transit systems. The main goals of CETAP are to: 1) identify and set aside areas for major transportation facilities; 2) ensure that transportation infrastructure will be in place to foster the economic development of Riverside County; and, 3) provide access to schools, jobs, shopping and other daily activities. One major component of the CETAP is to identify a location for the Winchester to Temecula Corridor, which will involve widening of 1-15 and 1-215, as well as construction of French Valley Parkway, connecting the French Valley Future Growth Area to 1-215 and providing an alternate freeway access point to Winchester Road. Other goals include providing expanded rail service and express bus service throughout Riverside County. Further, urbanized areas such as Riverside County are required under State law to adopt a Congestion Management Program (CMP). The Riverside County CMP is updated every two years and includes goals aimed at reducing traffic congestion, improving air quality, and providing a coordination mechanism between land development and transportation improvement decisions. The CMP is administered by the RCTC. The CMP incorporates federal Congestion Management System (CMS) guidelines. The RCTC has also developed an Enhanced Traffic Monitoring System, in which real-time traffic count data can be accessed to evaluate the condition of the CMS, as well as meet other monitoring requirements at the State and federal levels. In support of the CMP, the City of Temecula is required to maintain minimum level of service (LOS) thresholds identified in May 2017 83 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening the General Plan and requires traffic impact analyses for development projects to evaluate potential impacts on the circulation system at a local and regional level. Currently, Pechanga Parkway operates as a primary north -south arterial for the southern portion of the City of Temecula circulation network. In response to high traffic volumes, the proposed project would continue the 2009 Pechanga Parkway Phase II improvements which widened Pechanga Parkway from State Route 79 South (Temecula Parkway) to Wolf Valley Road. The objective of the proposed project is to widen Pechanga Parkway in order to accommodate existing and predicted traffic demands and uphold the City of Temecula General Plan goals to alleviate traffic congestion, improve roadway safety, and provide better access to regional transportation routes. Due to the expansion of the Pechanga Resort & Casino and continued residential development along Pechanga Parkway, the need for additional roadway capacity to meet existing and future needs has been identified. Therefore, as a road widening project, the proposed improvements would contribute to reduced traffic congestion along Pechanga Parkway and would further the long-term transportation needs identified by the City to ensure circulation infrastructure can adequately meet demands and continue to provide efficient local and regional access. As such, the project is not anticipated to conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to, level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads and highways. Impacts would be less than significant. c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? Determination: No Impact. As discussed in Impact 3.8(e), the proposed project is located approximately 7.5 miles to the southeast of the French Valley Airport and is not located within the Compatibility Zones identified in the Riverside County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan. Additionally, the project proposes roadway widening and associated improvements (i.e. street lighting) that would in no way result in a change to air traffic patterns. Therefore, no impact would occur. d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? Determination: No Impact. Refer to Impact 3.16(a), above. The proposed project would result in the widening of existing Pechanga Parkway and is intended to accommodate existing and predicted traffic demands, reduce traffic congestion, and improve safety on the roadway. The affected segment of the roadway does not presently support any curves, and no such elements are proposed with the project. No new land uses are proposed along the corridor, and no existing land uses would be disturbed, as all work would occur within the roadway ROW. As such, the project would not substantially increase hazards due to a design feature or incompatible use. No impact would occur. e) Result in inadequate emergency access? Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Refer to Impacts 3.16(a) and (b), above. The project would affect an approximately 3,500 -foot long segment of the roadway, and therefore, temporary construction activities would have the potential to interfere with emergency access to adjacent properties (i.e. residential uses and the casino). The project is subject to City review to ensure that the project as designed does not temporarily or permanently interfere with the provision of emergency access or with evacuation routes. Additionally, a Traffic Control Plan (TCP) would be prepared by the City, prior to project construction, to ensure that project construction activities do not substantially restrict traffic Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 84 May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening f) flows on area roadways and that emergency access and public safety are maintained at all times during all phases of project construction. Traffic control during project construction shall occur in accordance with the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices), and/or the American Public Works Association (APWA) Work Area Traffic Control Handbook. All traffic control measures shall be in place prior to the commencement of any work. Additionally, over the long-term, the proposed roadway widening is aimed at alleviating traffic congestion along Pechanga Parkway and furthering the long-term transportation needs identified by the City of Temecula General Plan. The roadway improvements would also contribute to enhanced emergency access along Pechanga Parkway by improving traffic circulation and safety along Pechanga Parkway. With implementation of the TCP, and conformance with City standards regarding the provision of emergency access, project construction and operation would not result in inadequate emergency access. Impacts would be less than significant. Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Project construction along Pechanga Parkway may temporarily restrict access to or use of existing area sidewalks, bus stops, and/or bike lanes within the project vicinity. As indicated above, a TCP would be prepared and implemented to ensure that such elements are not substantially affected and that alternative means are provided during the project construction. As construction would be short-term and temporary, combined with implementation of a TCP, project construction would not conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation. Impacts would be less than significant. Additionally, as stated above, Pechanga Parkway functions as a primary north -south arterial and experiences high traffic volumes. Consistent with prior improvements made to the segment of Pechanga Parkway from State Route 79 South (Temecula Parkway) to Wolf Valley Road, the proposed project would provide sidewalks along each side of the roadway within the project boundary to enhance and encourage pedestrian movement and access. The construction of bike lanes is not required as part of the City's roadway design standards for arterial roadways, and no bike lanes are therefore proposed. May 2017 85 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening 3.17 TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES 5. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES — Would the project: Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California native American tribe, and that is: a) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code Section 5020.1(k)?, or b) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe? Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California native American tribe, and that is listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code Section 5020.1(k)? Determination: Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. California State Assembly Bill No. 52 (AB 52) amended CEIA by creating a new category of cultural resources, tribal cultural resources, and requires consultation with Native American Tribes. Governor Brown signed AB 52 on Sept 25, 2014, and the Bill became effective July 1, 2015. Pursuant to AB 52, lead agencies are required to consult with Native American tribes who request consultation for projects located within their traditional territory. AB 52 consultation is required for projects that have a Notice of Preparation, Notice of Negative Declaration, or Notice of Mitigated Negative Declaration on or after July 1, 2015. AB 52 consultation is ongoing throughout the processing of a project until mutual agreement can be reached. Consultation is considered concluded when: (1) all parties are in agreement; (2) acting in good faith and after reasonable effort, mutual agreement cannot be reached; or, (3) tribes are non-responsive. The City has conducted consultation with five area Native American Tribes and other area tribal offices/departments (refer to Appendix C, City of Temecula AB 52 Notification to Tribes). Only the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians indicated that known tribal cultural resources are within the project area of potential effect for the proposed project. The Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 86 May 2017 Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 5. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES — Would the project: Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California native American tribe, and that is: a) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code Section 5020.1(k)?, or b) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe? Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California native American tribe, and that is listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code Section 5020.1(k)? Determination: Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. California State Assembly Bill No. 52 (AB 52) amended CEIA by creating a new category of cultural resources, tribal cultural resources, and requires consultation with Native American Tribes. Governor Brown signed AB 52 on Sept 25, 2014, and the Bill became effective July 1, 2015. Pursuant to AB 52, lead agencies are required to consult with Native American tribes who request consultation for projects located within their traditional territory. AB 52 consultation is required for projects that have a Notice of Preparation, Notice of Negative Declaration, or Notice of Mitigated Negative Declaration on or after July 1, 2015. AB 52 consultation is ongoing throughout the processing of a project until mutual agreement can be reached. Consultation is considered concluded when: (1) all parties are in agreement; (2) acting in good faith and after reasonable effort, mutual agreement cannot be reached; or, (3) tribes are non-responsive. The City has conducted consultation with five area Native American Tribes and other area tribal offices/departments (refer to Appendix C, City of Temecula AB 52 Notification to Tribes). Only the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians indicated that known tribal cultural resources are within the project area of potential effect for the proposed project. The Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 86 May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening ('Ataaxum) has indicated that the Project site is encompassed within the Tribe's aboriginal territory. To ensure that no unknown tribal resources associated with the traditional cultural landscape are adversely affected, including those associated with the Pechanga Band of Luise no Indians, Mitigation Measure CR -1 through CR -7 is proposed to require monitoring by a qualified archaeologist. Additionally, Mitigation Measure CR -1 through CR -7 will require that a representative from the Pechanga Tribe monitor all ground -disturbing activities that involve trenching for utility installation and earthmoving activities for water quality basins, initial site grading, and fill of imported soil onto the site. If inadvertent human remains are uncovered during earthwork activities, Mitigation Measure CR -9 requires that construction activities be halted in the vicinity of the find and any area that is reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent remains until the County Coroner has been notified, and the remains have been investigated. lithe remains are determined to be Native American in origin, the applicable state law process shall be followed. The proposed mitigation measures would ensure that any tribal resources discovered are properly evaluated for significance and avoided and/or otherwise preserved, as appropriate, in perpetuity. With the proposed mitigation, impacts would be reduced to Tess than significant. MITIGATION MEASURES CR -1 Refer to Impact 3.5(a), above. CR -2 Refer to Impact 3.5(a), above. CR -3 Refer to Impact 3.5(a), above. CR -4 Refer to Impact 3.5(a), above. CR -5 Refer to Impact 3.5(a), above. CR -6 Refer to Impact 3.5(a), above. CR -7 Refer to Impact 3.5(a), above. CR -9 Refer to Impact 3.5(d), above. b. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California native American tribe, and that is a resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1? In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe. Determination: Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. The construction activities proposed under the project have the potential to result in a significant impact to tribal cultural resources. The Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians has shown that the project site is located adjacent to a Traditional Cultural Property known as the Luiseno Ancestral Origin Landscape. This resource is listed in the NRHP and California Register of Historic Places. Potential impacts within the boundaries of this Traditional Cultural Property could cause a substantial adverse change of a tribal cultural resource as defined in Public Resources Code section 21074. As the Pechanga Tribe has identified a Traditional Cultural Resource near the project site, Mitigation Measures CR -1 through CR -7 are proposed. Mitigation Measures CR -1 through CR -7 require the presence of an archaeological monitor and Pechanga Tribal monitor May 2017 87 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening during all project -related ground disturbance activities. With implementation of Mitigation Measure CR -1 through CR -7, the project's potential impacts to the Luiseno Ancestral Origin Landscape and tribal cultural resources would be less than significant. MITIGATION MEASURES CR -1 Refer to Impact 3.5(a), above. CR -2 Refer to Impact 3.5(a), above. CR -3 Refer to Impact 3.5(a), above. CR -4 Refer to Impact 3.5(a), above. CR -5 Refer to Impact 3.5(a), above. CR -6 Refer to Impact 3.5(a), above. CR -7 Refer to Impact 3.5(a), above. CR -9 Refer to Impact 3.5(d), above. Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 88 May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening 3.18 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS 17. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS - Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new stormwater drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? g) ❑ ❑ 0 IJ O 0 0 IJ O 0 IL 0 o o o 0 o ❑ 0 Er o o Q 0 Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? Determination: No Impact. Surface runoff from the project is also addressed in Impacts 3.9(a), 3.9(c), 3.9(e), and 3.9(f) in Section 3.9, Hydrology and Water Quality, of this Initial Study. The roadway improvements proposed under the project would not result in the production of wastewater, and therefore, no wastewater treatment would be required with project construction or operation. No impact would occur in this regard. b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? Determination: No Impact. Water for the landscaped medians proposed along the affected segment of Pechanga Parkway would continue to be provided by Rancho California Water District (RCWD) and would be served by direct connection to existing recycled water lines. Wastewater services for the project area are currently provided by the Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD). Due to the nature of the roadway improvements, project implementation would not increase wastewater production or May 2017 89 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Incorporated Less Than ificant Significant Impact No Impact 17. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS - Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new stormwater drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? g) ❑ ❑ 0 IJ O 0 0 IJ O 0 IL 0 o o o 0 o ❑ 0 Er o o Q 0 Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? Determination: No Impact. Surface runoff from the project is also addressed in Impacts 3.9(a), 3.9(c), 3.9(e), and 3.9(f) in Section 3.9, Hydrology and Water Quality, of this Initial Study. The roadway improvements proposed under the project would not result in the production of wastewater, and therefore, no wastewater treatment would be required with project construction or operation. No impact would occur in this regard. b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? Determination: No Impact. Water for the landscaped medians proposed along the affected segment of Pechanga Parkway would continue to be provided by Rancho California Water District (RCWD) and would be served by direct connection to existing recycled water lines. Wastewater services for the project area are currently provided by the Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD). Due to the nature of the roadway improvements, project implementation would not increase wastewater production or May 2017 89 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening require the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities. No impact would occur in this regard. c) Require or result in the construction of new stormwater drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Refer to Impact 3.17(a), above. In addition to the widening of Pechanga Parkway from four lanes to six lanes and related circulation improvements (relocation of street lights and traffic signals, median curb and landscaping, etc.), the project also includes curb, gutter, sound wall, sidewalk, landscaping, and storm drain improvements. Additionally, the flood control facilities that run parallel to Pechanga Parkway would require modification to accommodate the widened roadway. As the roadway widening would result in an increase in impervious surface area, thereby potentially increasing stormwater runoff, the proposed stormwater drainage improvements are intended to ensure that stormwater runoff from the affected roadway can be adequately handled and to improve the ability of the City's existing system to adequately accommodate runoff from surrounding properties. All storm drain improvements would occur within the roadway ROW which is highly disturbed, due to prior development activities. Any significant environmental effects resulting with the proposed storm drain improvements as part of the roadway widening project (i.e. to biological or cultural resources, etc.) are evaluated herein in this Initial Study and mitigated for as appropriate to reduce potential project effects to less than significant. As such, although the project would result in construction of new stormwater drainage facilities, construction itself would not directly cause a significant environmental effect. Impacts would be Tess than significant. d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? Determination: No Impact. Refer to Impact 3.17(b), above. As a roadway widening project, the proposed improvements would not substantially increase demand on existing water (or recycled water) service facilities. The project would not result in development of a land use that would require the provision or expansion of water service. Although minimal, water may be used for dust suppression purposes during project construction; however, sufficient water supplies are available to serve such purposes from existing entitlements and resources. New or expanded water treatment facilities would not be required to serve the project site, nor would the project adversely affect the ability of the EMWD to provide adequate wastewater services. No impact would occur in this regard. e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider, which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? Determination: No Impact. Refer to Impact 3.17(b), above. As a roadway widening project, the proposed improvements would not increase demand on existing wastewater treatment facilities. The project would not result in development of a land use that would require the provision or expansion of wastewater treatment facilities to serve the project site, or that would affect the ability of the EMWD to provide adequate wastewater services. No impact would occur in this regard. Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Project construction may require some demolition/excavation of existing materials and soils, which would necessitate solid waste hauling. All excavation and construction debris would be required to demonstrate compliance with all federal, State, and local statutes and regulations f) Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 90 May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening g) related to solid waste, including the 50 percent diversion of solid waste requirement pursuant to the California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 (AB 939). Pursuant to AB 939, the City has prepared a Source Reduction and Recycling Element (SSRE) and implements the Element to ensure that the City's solid waste reduction goals continue to be met. The proposed roadway widening project would be required to comply with such goals stipulated under the City's SRRE for diverting solid waste, as applicable. Project construction would also be subject to the solid waste disposal goals and policies identified under the General Plan Growth Management/Public Facilities Element. Project conformance with AB 939, along with the City's SRRE and City General Plan goals and policies, would ensure project compliance with the statutes and regulations in place relative to solid waste disposal. A less than significant impact would occur in this regard. Comply with federal, State, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Refer to Response 3.17(f), above. The project would be required to comply with City's adopted construction and solid waste disposal programs and applicable federal, State, and local regulations pertaining to solid waste. Therefore, a less than significant impact would occur. May 2017 91 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening 3.19 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE 18. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? Determination: Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. The project's potential impacts to wildlife would be reduced to a less than significant level through the proposed mitigation measures; refer to Section 3.4, Biological Resources. Similarly, potential impacts to cultural resources, particularly unknown buried resources, would be reduced to less than significant levels through compliance with the proposed mitigation measures; refer to Section 3.5, Cultural Resources. As such, potential impacts as noted above would be mitigated through implementing standard City -approved measures and the recommended mitigation measures. b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? Determination: Less than Significant Impact. The proposed project would not have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable. Given the project's relatively small scale, the disturbed nature of the project site (existing roadway ROW), the temporary nature of required construction activities, and the mitigatable long-term operational impacts, project -related cumulative impacts are not considered significant, and no mitigation measures are required. Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 92 May 2017 Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 18. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? Determination: Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. The project's potential impacts to wildlife would be reduced to a less than significant level through the proposed mitigation measures; refer to Section 3.4, Biological Resources. Similarly, potential impacts to cultural resources, particularly unknown buried resources, would be reduced to less than significant levels through compliance with the proposed mitigation measures; refer to Section 3.5, Cultural Resources. As such, potential impacts as noted above would be mitigated through implementing standard City -approved measures and the recommended mitigation measures. b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? Determination: Less than Significant Impact. The proposed project would not have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable. Given the project's relatively small scale, the disturbed nature of the project site (existing roadway ROW), the temporary nature of required construction activities, and the mitigatable long-term operational impacts, project -related cumulative impacts are not considered significant, and no mitigation measures are required. Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 92 May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Determination: Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. The proposed project would not result in environmental effects that would cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly, following implementation of the recommended mitigation measures for aesthetics, biological and cultural resources, geology and soils, hydrology and water quality, and noise. Construction and operational activities are anticipated to have some minor impacts, all of which have been mitigated where appropriate. All potential long-term impacts would be reduced to less than significant levels through implementation of required mitigation measures, as described in the impact discussions in Sections 3.1 to 3.17, above. May 2017 93 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 94 May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening 4.0 REFERENCES 4.1 REPORT PREPARATION PERSONNEL LEAD AGENCY City of Temecula 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 William Becerra, Associate Engineer Scott Cooper, Associate Planner ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Michael Baker International 40810 County Center Drive, Suite 200 Temecula, CA 92591 Darren Edgington, CEP -IT, LEED AP BD+C, Environmental Project Manager Peter Minegar, CEP -IT, Assistant Project Manager Nicole Marotz, AICP, LEED AP, Senior Environmental Planner Alicia Gonzalez, Environmental Associate Travis McGill, Natural Resources Technical Specialist Achilles Malisos, Air Quality/Climate Change and Noise Studies Manager Hilary Potter, Technical Writer Travis McGill, Biologist Francisco Martinez Jr, PE, Civil Engineer Candice Fenton, Civil Designer BCR Consulting (Cultural Resources) 1420 Guadalajara Place Claremont, CA 91711 David Brunzell, Principal Investigator/Archaeologist GECON West, Inc. (Geotechnical) 41571 Coming Place, Suite 101 Murrieta, CA 92562 Chet Robinson, GE Lisa A. Battiato, CEG May 2017 95 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening 4.2 REFERENCE DOCUMENTS BonTerra Consulting, 2013, April. Habitat Mitigation and Monitoring Program for the Pechanga Parkway Storm Drain Improvements Project. BRC Consulting, LLC. 2016, February 2017. Cultural Resources Assessment. California Department of Conservation. - --. 1990. State of California Special Study Zones, Pechanga Quadrangle. http://gmw.consrv.ca.gov/shmp/download/quad/PECHANGA/maps/ PECHANGA.PDF. Accessed November 3, 2016. - --. 2012. Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program. ftp://ftp.consrv.ca.gov/pub/dlrp/FMMP/pdf/2012/riv12_w.pdf. Accessed November 3, 2016. California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. 2007. Fire Hazard Severity Zones in SRA, Western Riverside County [map]. Accessed October 20, 2016. http://fra p.fi re.ca.gov/webdata/ma ps/riverside_west/fhszs_ma p.60. pdf. California Department of Toxic Substances Control. 2015. EnviroStor. Accessed October 20, 2016. http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public. California Environmental Protection Agency. 2015. California Greenhouse Gas Emission Inventory, 2015 Edition. Accessed March 28, 2016. http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/inventory/data/data.htm. CalRecycle (California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery). 2016. Facility/Site Summary Details: El Sobrante Landfill (33 -AA -0217). Accessed October 20, 2016. http://www.calrecycle.ca.gov/SW Facilities/Directory/33-AA-0217/Detail/. Caltrans (California Department of Transportation) - --. 2002. Transportation Related Earthborne Vibrations. - --. 2004. Caltrans (California Department of Transportation), Transportation- and Construction - Induced Vibration Guidance Manual. - --. 2013. Technical Noise Supplement to the Traffic Noise Analysis Protocol. CNRA (California Natural Resources Agency). 2012. Our Changing Climate: Vulnerability & Adaptation to the Increasing Risks of Climate Change in California. http://www.energy.ca.gov/2012publications/CEC-500-2012-007/CEC-500-2012-007. pdf. Federal Airport Administration. 2015. Airport Contacts Information. Accessed October 20, 2016. http://www.faa.gov/airports/airport safety/airportdata 5010/menu/contacts.cfm?Region=&Di strict=&State=&County=RIVERSIDE&City=&Use=&Certification=. Federal Highway Administration. 2006. Roadway Construction Noise Model (FHWA-HEP-05-054). Federal Transit Administration. 2006. Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Guidelines. FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency). 2015. Flood Map Service Center. Accessed December 29. https://msc.fema.gov/portal. FICON (Federal Interagency Committee on Noise). 1992, August. Federal Agency Review of Selected Airport Noise Analysis Issues. Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 96 May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening Geocon West, Inc. Geotechnical Investigation. 2016, October 12.Governor's Office of Planning and Research. 2008. CEQA and Climate Change: Addressing Climate Change Through California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Review. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). 2013. Carbon and Other Biogeochemical Cycles. In: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. http://www.climatechange2013.org/ images/report/WG 1AR5_ALL_FINAL.pdf. Michael Baker International. - --. 2016, August. Project Specific Water Quality Management Plan. - --. 2016. Habitat Assessment and Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) Consistency Analysis for the Pechanga Parkway Widening Project. December 2016. Riverside County Airport Land Use Commission. 2004. Riverside County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan. Riverside County Transportation Commission. 2011. 2011 Riverside County Congestion Management Program. SCAQMD (South Coast Air Quality Management District). - --. 1993. CEQA Air Quality Handbook. - --. 2008. Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology. Revised July 2008. Temecula, City of. - --. 2005a. Temecula General Plan. - --. 2005b. Temecula General Plan Environmental Impact Report. - --. 2010. City of Temecula Sustainability Plan. - --. N.d. City of Temecula Municipal Code. Temecula, City of. Geographic Information System. http://gis.citvoftemecula.org/Html5Viewer/?viewer=CityOfTemecula. Accessed November 3, 2016. Temecula, City of. Geographic Information System, High Fire GIS Layer. http://Ris.citvoftemecula.org/Html5Viewer/?viewer=CityOfTemecula. Accessed October 20, 2016. Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority. 2003. Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan. Volume I, Section 3. http://www.wrc- rca.org/GIS Online Mapping/MSHCP docs/AreaPlans/MSHCP%20Southwest%20Area%20Criter is%20Table.pdf. Accessed November 4, 2016. May 2017 97 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 98 May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening 4.3 INVENTORY OF MITIGATION MEASURES Aesthetics AES -1 Prior to construction, the City shall define the temporary construction equipment staging areas to be used within the project site. Materials, heavy-duty equipment, and debris piles shall be clustered in order to minimize visual impacts during construction. Biological Resources BIO -1 Within seven days prior to commencement of any ground -disturbing activities (e.g., clearing, grubbing, demolition, earthmoving, construction), burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia) surveys shall be conducted by a qualified biologist per the Burrowing Owl Survey Protocol and Mitigation Guidelines (California Burrowing Owl Consortium 1997) and the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (California Department of Fish and Wildlife [CDFW]; March 7, 2012), as follows: • During the burrowing owl (BUOW) breeding season (February 1 through August 31), protocol surveys for active nest burrows shall be performed within potentially suitable habitat (as determined by the biologist) inside and up to 500 feet from the demarcated disturbance limits. A non -disturbance buffer of 250 feet shall be delineated by the biologist around active nests, in consultation with CDFW, and no disturbance activities shall occur within the buffer(s) until the BUOW breeding season is over. • During the non -breeding season for BUOW (September 1 through January 31), protocol surveys for resident BUOWs shall be performed within potentially suitable habitat (as determined by the biologist) inside and up to 500 feet from the demarcated disturbance limits. A passive relocation program may be implemented for observed BUOWs using occupied burrows pursuant to CDFW approval. The relocation of resident BUOWs shall be according to a relocation plan prepared by the biologist in consultation with and approved by CDFW. This plan shall provide for BUOW relocations to nearby suitable conserved lands possessing available nesting habitat and appropriate development -free buffers that are protected in perpetuity via conservation easements or other land preservation mechanisms. • The pedestrian protocol surveys shall include two early morning surveys between one hour before and two hours after sunrise, and two evening surveys between two hours before and one hour after sunset, via transects spaced to allow 100% visual coverage of the ground surface. The distance between transect center lines shall average approximately 100 feet, and may be reduced in places to account for differences in terrain, vegetation density, and ground surface visibility. BIO -2 1. Within seven days prior to commencement of grading/construction activities, a qualified biologist shall perform a pre -construction survey within 500 feet from the proposed work limits. 2. If active avian nest(s) are discovered within or 500 feet from the work limits, a buffer shall be delineated around the active nest(s) measuring 300 feet for May 2017 99 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening passerines and 500 feet for raptors. A qualified biologist shall monitor the nest(s) weekly after commencement of grading/construction to ensure that nesting behavior is not adversely affected by such activities. 3. If the qualified biologist determines that nesting behavior is adversely affected by grading/construction activities, then a noise mitigation program shall be implemented in consultation with CDFW, to allow such activities to proceed. Once the young have fledged and left the nest(s), then grading/construction activities may proceed within 300 feet (500 feet for raptor species) of the fledged nest(s). 4. Raptor nests are protected under Section 3503.5 of the California Fish and Game Code (California Law 2011) which makes it unlawful to take, possess, or destroy any birds in the orders Falconiformes or Strigiformes; or, to take, possess, or destroy the nests or eggs of any such birds. Consultation with CDFW shall be required prior to the removal of any raptor nest(s) observed during the preconstruction clearance surveys. Cultural Resources CR -1 CR -2 CR -3 CR -4 A professional archaeological monitor shall be present to monitor all ground - disturbing activities associated with the project. The archaeological monitor shall work under the direct supervision of a Cultural Resource Professional that meets the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualification Standards for Archaeology (U.S. Department of Interior, 2012) and as approved by the City of Temecula to provide archaeological expertise in carrying out all mitigation measures related to archaeological resources (Mitigation Measures CR -2, CR -3 and CR -5). The qualified archeologist, or an archaeologist working under the direction of the qualified archaeologist, along with a representative designated by the Pechanga Tribe, shall conduct a pre -construction cultural resources worker sensitivity training to inform construction personnel of the types of cultural resources that may be encountered, and to bring awareness to personnel of actions to be taken in the event of a cultural resources discovery. The City shall ensure that construction personnel are made available for and attend the training and shall retain documentation demonstrating attendance. Prior to the start of ground -disturbing activities, the qualified archaeologist shall designate an archaeological monitor to observe ground -disturbing activities, including but not limited to, brush clearance and grubbing, grading, trenching, excavation, and the construction of fencing and access roads, in consultation with the Pechanga tribal monitor. If ground -disturbing activities occur simultaneously in two or more areas located more than 500 feet apart, additional archaeological monitors may be required. The archaeological monitor shall keep daily logs. After monitoring has been completed, the qualified archaeologist shall prepare a monitoring report that details the results of monitoring activities, which shall be submitted to the City, Pechanga Tribe, and to the EIC at the University of California, Riverside. At least 30 days prior to the start of any ground disturbing activity, the City shall contact the Pechanga Tribe of grading, excavation and the monitoring program, and to coordinate with the Pechanga Tribe to develop a Cultural Resources Treatment and Monitoring Agreement (Agreement). The Agreement shall address the treatment of known cultural resources; the designation, responsibilities, and participation of Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 100 May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening Pechanga Tribal monitors during grading, excavation and all ground disturbing activities; project grading and development scheduling; terms of compensation for the monitors; and treatment and final disposition of any cultural resources, sacred sites, and human remains discovered on the site. The Pechanga Tribal monitor shall monitor observe ground -disturbing activities, including but not limited to, brush clearance and grubbing, grading, trenching, excavation, and the construction of fencing and access roads, in consultation with the archaeological monitor. If ground -disturbing activities occur simultaneously in two or more areas located more than 500 feet apart, additional archaeological monitors may be required. The Pechanga tribal monitor shall keep daily logs. If ground -disturbing activities occur simultaneously in two or more locations, additional Pechanga tribal monitors may be required. CR -5 If inadvertent discoveries of subsurface archaeological/cultural resources are made during ground -disturbing activities, the applicant, the qualified archaeologist, and the Pechanga Tribe shall assess the significance of such resources and shall meet and confer regarding the mitigation for such resources. Pursuant to PRC Section 21083.2(b) avoidance is the preferred method of preservation for archaeological resources. PRC Section 21084.3 further requires that agencies shall avoid damaging effects to tribal cultural resources, if feasible. If the City, the qualified archaeologist, and the Pechanga Tribe cannot agree on the significance or the mitigation for such resources, these issues will be presented to the City Planning Director for decision. The City Planning Director shall make the determination based on the provisions of the CEQA with respect to archaeological resources and shall take into account the religious beliefs, customs, and practices of the Pechanga Tribe. Notwithstanding any other rights available under the law, the decision of the City Planning Director shall be appealable to the City Planning Commission and/or City Council. CR -6 The City shall relinquish ownership of all cultural resources, including sacred items, burial goods and all archaeological artifacts that are recovered as a result of project implementation to the Pechanga Tribe for proper treatment and disposition as outlined in the Agreement (Mitigation Measure CUL -4). CR -7 All sacred sites, should they be encountered within the project area, shall be avoided and preserved as the preferred mitigation, if feasible. CR -8 Prior to Grading Permit issuance and in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan Implementation Measure OS -26, Development Review Process, the City shall retain a qualified paleontologist to observe grading and deep excavation activities in areas where the probable presence of paleontological resources is identified. In the event that paleontological resources are inadvertently discovered during ground disturbing activities, the qualified paleontologist shall document the discovery as appropriate, evaluate the potential resource, and assess the significance of the find under the criteria set forth in CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5. If the fossil or fossil - bearing deposit are discovered during construction, excavations within 50 feet of the find shall be temporarily halted or diverted until the discovery is examined by the qualified paleontologist (in accordance with Society of Vertebrate Paleontology standards, Society of Vertebrate Paleontology, 1995). The paleontologist shall notify the appropriate agencies to determine procedures that would be followed before construction is allowed to resume at the location of the find. If the City determines May 2017 101 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration CR -9 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening that avoidance is not feasible, the paleontologist shall prepare an excavation plan for mitigating the effect of the Project on the qualities that make the resource significant (Paleontological Resources Mitigation Program). The Paleontological Resources Mitigation Program shall be submitted to the City for review and approval, prior to the resumption of grading activities at the location of the find. Consistent with State CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5, Subdivision (e), in the event of an accidental discovery or recognition of any human remains, the County Coroner shall be notified and construction activities at the affected work site shall be halted. Further, pursuant to PRC Section 5097.98(b) remains shall be left in place and free from disturbance until a final decision as to the treatment and disposition has been made. If the remains are found to be Native American, the County Coroner shall notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) within 24 hours. The NAHC shall immediately notify the most likely descendant(s) under Public Resources Code Section 5097.98, and the descendants must make recommendations or state their preference for treatment within 48 hours of being granted access to the site as identified in Agreement described in Mitigation Measure CR -4. Geology and Soils GEO-1 Prior to commencement of any project grading activities, and in accordance with National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) requirements, the City of Temecula shall prepare a stormwater pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) for approval by the City's Public Works Department. The SWPPP shall include relevant best management practices (BMPs) in order to minimize soil erosion and water quality impacts during project construction. Hydrology and Water Quality GEO-1 Refer to Geology, above. Noise NOI-1 Prior to initiation of construction, the City of Temecula shall ensure that the following measures are incorporated into construction contract documents: • All construction equipment, fixed, or mobile, shall be equipped with properly operating and maintained mufflers and other State required noise attenuation devices. • A construction notice shall be mailed to residents within a 150 -foot radius of the project and shall indicate the dates and duration of construction activities, as well as provide a contact name and a telephone number where residents can inquire about the construction process and register complaints. • All construction, maintenance, or demolition activities associated with the proposed project shall be limited to the hours between 7:00 AM and 6:30 PM Mondays — Saturdays. All construction on Sundays and National holidays shall be prohibited. • Construction haul routes shall be designed to avoid noise sensitive uses (e.g., residences, convalescent homes, etc.). Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 102 May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening • During construction, stationary construction equipment shall be placed such that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive noise receivers. • Construction equipment staging areas shall be located away from adjacent sensitive receptors. Tribal Cultural Resources CR -1 Refer to Impact 3.5(a), above. CR -2 Refer to Impact 3.5(a), above. CR -3 Refer to Impact 3.5(a), above. CR -4 Refer to Impact 3.5(a), above. CR -5 Refer to Impact 3.5(a), above. CR -6 Refer to Impact 3.5(a), above. CR -7 Refer to Impact 3.5(a), above. CR -9 Refer to Impact 3.5(d), above. May 2017 103 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 104 May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening 5.0 CONSULTANT RECOMMENDATION Based on the information and environmental analysis contained in the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration, we recommend that the City of Temecula prepare a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Pechanga Parkway Widening Project. Refer to Section 6.0, Lead Agency Determination. Darren Edgington, CEP -IT, LEED AP Associate/Environmental Specialist Michael Baker International May 16, 2017 Date May 2017 105 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 106 May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening 6.0 LEAD AGENCY DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed use COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposal could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described in Section 5.0 have been added. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposal MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposal MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at least one effect (1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and (2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. Signature William Becerra/Associate Engineer City of Temecula Agency //61Z.6/7 Printed Name/Title Date May 2017 107 initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 108 May 2017 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening Appendix A: Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas Data December 2016 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 1.0 Project Characteristics Page 1 of 28 Date: 11/11/2016 3:26 PM Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Annual Pechanga Parkway Widening Riverside -South Coast County, Annual 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses 1 Size 1 Metric ILot Acreage I Floor Surface Area I Population Other Asphalt Surfaces 120.15 1000sgft 2.76 120,151.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Climate Zone 10 Utility Company Southern California Edison Wind Speed (m/s) 2.4 CO2 Intensity 702.44 CH4 Intensity (Ib/MWhr) (Ib/MWhr) 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non -Default Data 0.029 Precipitation Freq (Days) 28 Operational Year 2018 N20 Intensity (Ib/MWhr) 0.006 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 2 of 28 Date: 11/11/2016 3:26 PM Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Annual Project Characteristics - Land Use - Accounts for roadway expansion, curbs, gutters, median, bus turnout, sidewalks, and access ramps Construction Phase - Construction phase duration per project contractor Off-road Equipment - Off-road Equipment - Equipment list per project contractor Off-road Equipment - Construction equipment per project contractor Off-road Equipment - Equipment list per project contractor Off-road Equipment - Equipment list per project contractor Grading - Demolition - Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - SCAQMD Rule 403 Table Name tblConstD ustM itigation tblConstDustM itigation tblConstructionPhase tblConstructionPhase tblConstructionPhase tblConstructionPhase tblConstructionPhase tblConstructionPhase tblConstructionPhase tblConstructionPhase tblConstructionPhase tblConstructionPhase tblConstructionPhase tblGrading Column Name • • • • • Clean PavedRoad PercentReduction W aterU npaved RoadVehicleSpeed NumDays NumDays NumDays PhaseEndDate PhaseEndDate PhaseEndDate PhaseEndDate PhaseStartDate PhaseStartDate PhaseStartDate PhaseStartDate MaterialExported Default Value Y • Y • Y • 4- • • 0 40 220.00 20.00 6.00 10/25/2017 12/8/2016 12/21/2016 11/8/2017 12/22/2016 11/11/2016 12/14/2016 10/26/2017 New Value 40 15 10.00 15.00 10.00 5/19/2017 4/21/2017 5/5/2017 6/2/2017 5/6/2017 4/1/2017 4/22/2017 5/20/2017 0.00 1,973.00 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 3 of 28 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Annual Date: 11/11/2016 3:26 PM tblOffRoadEquipment LoadFactor • 0.50 0.50 4 4 tblOffRoadEquipment LoadFactor 0.42 i 0.42 tblOffRoadEquipment • LoadFactor • 0.50 + 0.50 tblOffRoadEquipment • LoadFactor • 0.44 + 0.44 tblOffRoadEquipment • LoadFactor • Y 0.42 i 0.42 tblOffRoadEquipment • LoadFactor • Y 0.42 f 0.42 tblOffRoadEquipment • LoadFactor • 0.36 1 0.36 tblOffRoadEquipment • LoadFactor • 0.38 + 0.38 tblOffRoadEquipment LoadFactor Y 0.30 + 0.30 tblOffRoadEquipment LoadFactor • 0.50 + 0.50 tblOffRoadEquipment ▪ OffRoadEquipmentType + Trenchers tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType : t Other Construction Equipment tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType T + Trenchers tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType + Off -Highway Tractors tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType f Other Construction Equipment tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Y + Other Construction Equipment tblOffRoadEquipment ▪ OffRoadEquipmentType + Paving Equipment tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Y Rollers tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Y i Surfacing Equipment tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType + Trenchers tblOffRoadEquipment ▪ OffRoadEquipmentType 4▪ - t Surfacing Equipment tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Y f Other Construction Equipment tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount T 1.00 t 0.00 4 4- tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 t 0.00 4 4- tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount • 1.00 1 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount • 2.00 1 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment ▪ OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount • 1.00 0.00 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 4 of 28 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Annual Date: 11/11/2016 3:26 PM tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount • 2.00 1.00 4 4 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount • 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment • • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount • 1.00 + 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment • • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 + 1.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount • 2.00 + 1.00 tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount •1.00 t 0.00 4 tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 0.00 2.0 Emissions Summary CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 5 of 28 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Annual 2.1 Overall Construction Unmitigated Construction Date: 11/11/2016 3:26 PM Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Year tons/yr MT/yr 2017 • 0.0530 0.5373 0.3330 7.1000e- 0.0299 0.0282 0.0581 5.6300e- 0.0262 0.0318 0.0000 66.0650 66.0650 0.0138 0.0000 66.4093 004 003 + . PM2.5 , 004 Total 003 1 1 y i Maximum 0.0530 0.5373 0.3330 7.1000e- 004 0.0299 0.0282 0.0581 5.6300e- 003 0.0262 0.0318 0.0000 66.0650 66.0650 0.0138 0.0000 66.4093 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO 502 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Year tons/yr MT/yr 2017 • 0.0530 0.5373 0.3330 7.1000e- 0.0131 0.0282 0.0413 2.8000e- 0.0262 0.0290 1 0.0000 66.0650 66.0650 0.0138 0.0000 66.4092 004 003 + . PM2.5 PM2.5 Total i Maximum 0.0530 0.5373 0.3330 7.1000e- 0.0131 0.0282 0.0413 2.8000e- 0.0262 0.0290 0.0000 66.0650 66.0650 0.0138 0.0000 66.4092 28.93 50.27 0.00 8.90 004 0.00 0.00 0.00 003 0.00 Reduction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total - Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 56.20 0.00 28.93 50.27 0.00 8.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 6 of 28 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Annual Date: 11/11/2016 3:26 PM Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) 2 2-11-2017 5-10-2017 0.3766 0.3766 3 5-11-2017 8-10-2017 0.2119 0.2119 Total CO2 CH4 Highest 0.3766 0.3766 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr ' Area Energy Mobile Waste Water A • • • Ai • •., • • . 9.5900e- 003 0.0000 -1- 0.0000 M 1.0000e- 005 r 0.0000 r 0.0000 r 7 - 1.5500e- 003 r 0.0000 0.0000 r 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.0000 r Y • Y 0.0000 Y 1.0000e- , 005 r 0.0000 r 0.0000 r 0.0000 Y 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 r 0.0000 r 0.0000 Y 0.0000 r 0.0000 • Y , Y T 0.0000 T • i rr • 1.0000e- 005 Y 0.0000 r 0.0000 r 0.0000 r 0.0000 1.0000e- a 005 r 4 0.0000 T • 0.0000 r + 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 ± a 1 0.0000 1 1 0.0000 a 1 0.0000 a a 1 0.0000 A a • 2.9800e- 003 r 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.9800e- 003 Y 0.0000 Y 0.0000 r 0.0000 Y -. 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 r 0.0000 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 3.1900e- 003 r t 0.0000 0.0000 T r 0.0000 0.0000 T r 0.0000 0.0000 r T 0.0000 0.0000 Total 9.5900e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.5500e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.9800e- 003 2.9800e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.1900e- 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 7 of 28 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Annual 2.2 Overall Operational Mitigated Operational Date: 11/11/2016 3:26 PM 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase ROG ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category A tons/yr MT/yr Area Energy Mobile Waste Water • • • • u • • • • 9.5900e- 003 0.0000 r 0.0000 -r 1.0000e- 005 r 0.0000 rr 0.0000 r 1.5500e- 003 r 0.0000 0.0000 r r 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.0000 r r r 0.0000 r r 1.0000e- , 005 r 0.0000 0.0000 r 0.0000 r 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 r 0.0000 0.0000 r 0.0000 r 0.0000 r 0.0000 r r 1.0000e- 005 r 0.0000 0.0000 r 0.0000 r 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 r 4 0.0000 4 0.0000 r • 0.0000 r • 0.0000 + 0.0000 + l i 0.0000 1 0.0000 i i 0.0000 1 l i 0.0000 l 1 • 2.9800e- 003 0.0000 r 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.0000 • 2.9800e- 003 r 0.0000 r 0.0000 r 0.0000 r 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 r 7 0.0000 r 0.0000 r 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.0000 t 0.0000 r 0.0000 r 0.0000 r 0.0000 3.1900e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 9.5900e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.5500e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.9800e- 003 2.9800e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.1900e- 003 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase ROG NOx CO SO2 Fug'tive Exhaust PM10 Fug'tive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio -CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent , 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 8 of 28 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Annual Date: 11/11/2016 3:26 PM Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 : Demolition i 2 :Grading 3 :Demolition :Grading :4/1/2017 i .4/22/2017 :Building Construction :Building Construction .5/6/2017 :5/19/2017 } -I- -I- -I- 5/20/2017 :6/2/2017 5: 10: :4/21/2017 4 :5/5/2017 4 4 5: 15: 4 5: 10: 4 t 5: 10: 4 :Paving :Paving Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0 Acres of Paving: 2.76 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non -Residential Indoor: 0; Non -Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating — sqft) OffRoad Equipment Phase Name Demolition Paving Demolition Building Construction Building Construction Building Construction Demolition Paving Paving Demolition Grading Building Construction Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power ( Load Factor :Trenchers 11 8.00: 78: 1 : Cement and Mortar Mixers : 0 i 8.00 H 9; :Concrete/Industrial Saws s 11 8.00: 81 Generator Sets F Oi 8.00 H 84 I H 1 I- 1 : Cranes: Oi 8.00: 231 1 • Forklifts 1- 01 7.00:I- .00: 89 : : Other Construction Equipment F 11 8.00: 172: I 1 I•- 1 : Pavers: 01 8.00: 130: i 1- 1 I - : Rollers : 11 8.00: 80: 1 • Rubber Tired Dozers I- 01 8.00 247: 1•Rubber Tired Dozers F 01 8.00 F 247 + +- • Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1: 6.00' 97 0.50 0.56 0.73 0.74 0.29 0.20 0.42 0.42 0.38 0.40 0.40 0.37 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 9 of 28 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Annual Date: 11/11/2016 3:26 PM Demolition • Tractors/LoadersBackhoes 1 Grading •Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes Paving •Tractors/LoadersBackhoes Grading Grading :Trenchers * Graders Paving :Paving Equipment Grading Building Construction * Off -Highway Tractors :Welders Grading :Other Construction Equipment Building Construction :Other Construction Equipment Building Construction :Paving Equipment Building Construction :Rollers Building Construction :Surfacing Equipment Building Construction Paving Paving :Trenchers :Surfacing Equipment ;Other Construction Equipment 1. 8.00, 971 4 E 11 7.00. 97, 1I• 1i 8.00. 97: 11 8.00 • 78: F• • 01 8.00 . 187 • • 11 8.00. 132: I- 1 • 11 H 8.00, 124. 01 8.00. 46: • 11 8.00. 172: 11 8.00 • 172: I- 4. 11 8.001 132: 11 8.00 • 80: 11 8.00. 2631 11 8.00. 78 • 11 8.00 . 263 + +- I. 1: 8.00' 172' 0.37 0.37 0.37 0.50 0.41 0.36 0.44 0.45 0.42 0.42 0.36 0.38 0.30 0.50 0.30 0.42 Trips and VMT Phase Name Building Construction Demolition Grading Paving Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class 61 50.00: 20.001 0.00: 14.701 6.901 20.001 L D_M ix 1 H DT_M ix 1 HHDT t 4 4h 10.00: 0.001 189.00: 14.701 6.901 20.00:LD_Mix :HDT_Mix 1HHDT I 1 t ;t 4F 10.00: 0.001 247.00, 14.701 6.901 20.001LD_Mix 1HDT_Mix 1HHDT 4- T 1- 4- 4- • 4- -1 5: 13.00: 0.00: 0.00: 14.70: 6.90: 20.00:LD Mix :HDT_Mix :HHDT 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Use Soil Stabilizer Replace Ground Cover Water Exposed Area Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads Clean Paved Roads 3.2 Demolition - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site Page 10 of 28 Date: 11/11/2016 3:26 PM Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Annual ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category - tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust Off -Road • 0.0154 r 0.1413 r 0.0982 rr 1.4000e- 004 0.0206 r 0.0000 r9.4700e- 003 0.0206 9.4700e- 003 3.1100e- 003 r 0.0000 r1- 8.9000e- , 003 3.1100e- i 0.0000 003 i J r 4t 8.9000e- + 0.0000 , 003 1 0.0000 12.8110 0.0000 r 12.8110 0.0000 r 3.0400e- 003 0.0000 r 0.0000 , 0.0000 12.8871 Total 0.0154 0.1413 0.0982 1.4000e- 004 0.0206 9.4700e- 003 0.0300 3.1100e- 003 8.9000e- 003 0.0120 0.0000 12.8110 12.8110 3.0400e- 003 0.0000 12.8871 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 11 of 28 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Annual 3.2 Demolition - 2017 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Date: 11/11/2016 3:26 PM Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category MT/yr tons/yr A MT/yr Hauling • 6.7000e- 0.0289 3.5800e- 7.0000e- 1.6300e- 1.5000e- 1.7800e- 4.5000e- 1.4000e- 5.9000e- + 0.0000 7.0357 7.0357 4.9000e- 0.0000 7.0479 004 003 005 003 004 003 004 004 004 i 004 , r r i Vendor • 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 r 0.0000 - 0.0000 T 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.0000 T 0.0000 003 l Worker • 4.5000e- 3.5000e- �3.6200e- 1.0000e- 8.2000e- r1.0000e- r8.3000e- r2.2000e- 0.0000 T 2.2000e- I 0.0000 0.7562 0.7562 r2.0000e- 0.0000 T 0.7568 004 004 003 005 004 005 004 004 004 j 005 , 003 , Total 0.0154 0.1413 0.0982 1.4000e- 6.8200e- 9.4700e- 0.0163 y 8.9000e- 9.9300e- 0.0000 12.8110 12.8110 Total 0.0000 1.1200e- 0.0292 7.2000e- 8.0000e- 2.4500e- 1.6000e- 2.6100e- 6.7000e- 1.4000e- 8.1000e- 0.0000 7.7919 7.7919 5.1000e- 0.0000 7.8047 003 003 005 003 004 003 004 004 004 004 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category tons/yr A MT/yr Fugitive Dust 6.8200e- 0.0000 6.8200e- 1.0300e- 0.0000 1.0300e- I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 003 003 003 003 1 Off -Road • 0.0154 r 0.1413 0.0982 r1.4000e- r 9.4700e- r9.4700e- r8.9000e- T 8.9000e- + 0.0000 r 12.8110 r 12.8110 r3.0400e- r 0.0000 T 12.8871 , 004 003 003 , 003 003 i 003 , Total 0.0154 0.1413 0.0982 1.4000e- 6.8200e- 9.4700e- 0.0163 1.0300e- 8.9000e- 9.9300e- 0.0000 12.8110 12.8110 3.0400e- 0.0000 12.8871 004 003 003 003 003 003 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 12 of 28 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Annual 3.2 Demolition - 2017 Mitigated Construction Off -Site Date: 11/11/2016 3:26 PM 3.3 Grading - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e tons/yr Category tons/yr MT/yr • • Hauling • Vendor • Worker • • 6.7000e- 004 -, w 0.0000 .. T- 4.5000e- 004 0.0289 r 0.0000 r3.5000e- 004 3.5800e- 003 0.0000 r3.6200e- 003 7.0000e- 005 T- 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.1400e- 003 T- 0.0000 r 5.4000e- 004 1.5000e- 004 T- 0.0000 r1.0000e- 005 1.2900e- , 003 T- 0.0000 r5.4000e- 004 3.3000e- , 004 r 0.0000 r1.5000e- 004 1.4000e- 004 T- 0.0000 T 0.0000 4.7000e- + 0.0000 004 ± 1 T „ 0.0000 i 0.0000 -• T 1.5000e- 1 0,0000 004 i i 7.0357 r 0.0000 0.7562 7.0357 r 0.0000 T 0.7562 4.9000e- 004 T- 0.0000 r2.0000e- 005 0.0000 , r 0.0000 T- -' 0.0000 , 7.0479 0.0000 0.7568 0.0607 Total 1.1200e- 003 0.0292 7.2000e- 003 8.0000e- 005 1.6800e- 003 1.6000e- 004 1.8300e- 003 4.8000e- 004 1.4000e- 004 6.2000e- 004 0.0000 7.7919 7.7919 5.1000e- 004 0.0000 7.8047 3.3 Grading - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust • Off -Road •8.8700e- 003 r 0.0902 Tr 0.0607 8.0000e- 005 1.2000e- , 004 r 0.0000 r 5.6100e- 003 1.2000e- 004 r 5.6100e- 003 2.0000e- 005 r . 0.0000 . T • 5.1700e- • 003 2.0000e- i 0.0000 005 i 1 T 4 5.1700e- I 0.0000 003 i l 0.0000 r 7.8287 0.0000 r 7.8287 0.0000 r 2.4000e- 003 0.0000 r t 0.0000 , 0.0000 7.8887 Total 8.8700e- 003 0.0902 0.0607 8.0000e- 005 1.2000e- 004 5.6100e- 003 5.7300e- 003 2.0000e- 005 5.1700e- 003 5.1900e- 003 0.0000 7.8287 7.8287 2.4000e- 003 0.0000 7.8887 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 13 of 28 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Annual 3.3 Grading - 2017 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Date: 11/11/2016 3:26 PM Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category MT/yr tons/yr MT/yr Hauling Vendor Worker • r n • • •, • • 8.7000e- 004 0.0000 3.0000e- 004 0.0377 , r 0.0000 r2.4000e- 004 4.6800e- 003 0.0000 7 r2.4100e- 003 1.0000e- 004 r 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 2.1300e- , 003 0.0000 r5.5000e- 004 2.0000e- 004 r 0.0000 r 0.0000 2.3300e- 003 Y 0.0000 Y 5.5000e- 004 5.8000e- 004 r 0.0000 r1.5000e- 004 1.9000e- 004 r 0.0000 Y 0.0000 7.7000e- + 0.0000 004 1 i r 1 0.0000 i 0.0000 l A T 4 1.5000e- + 0.0000 004 1 A 9.1948 -, 0.0000 -. 0.5041 9.1948 0.0000 0.5041 6.4000e- 004 r 7 0.0000 r2.0000e- 005 0.0000 , 0.0000 0.0000 , 9.2108 0.0000 0.5045 Total 8.0000e- 005 1.1700e- 003 0.0380 7.0900e- 003 1.1000e- 004 2.6800e- 003 2.0000e- 004 2.8800e- 003 7.3000e- 004 1.9000e- 004 9.2000e- 004 0.0000 9.6990 9.6990 6.6000e- 004 0.0000 9.7153 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust • Off -Road • 8.8700e- 003 r 0.0902 r 0.0607 r 8.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 Y -, . 0.0000 • 5.6100e- 003 . 4.0000e- ; 005 w -, • 5.6100e- 003 1.0000e- 005 -, 0.0000 5.1700e- 003 1.0000e- I 0.0000 005 + 1 r 4 5.1700e- 1 0.0000 003 i 0.0000 ,� 7 7.8287 0.0000 7.8287 . 0.0000 r2.4000e- 003 0.0000 . r T 0.0000 • , 0.0000 7.8887 Total 8.8700e- 003 0.0902 0.0607 8.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 5.6100e- 003 5.6500e- 003 1.0000e- 005 5.1700e- 003 5.1800e- 003 0.0000 7.8287 7.8287 2.4000e- 003 0.0000 7.8887 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 14 of 28 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Annual 3.3 Grading - 2017 Mitigated Construction Off -Site Date: 11/11/2016 3:26 PM 3.4 Building Construction - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category MT/yr tons/yr MT/yr Hauling Vendor Worker • • i,- • . A 8.7000e- 004 0.0000 3.0000e- 004 0.0377 r 0.0000 r 2.4000e- 004 4.6800e- 003 0.0000 r2.4100e- 003 1.0000e- 004 r 0.0000 r1.0000e- 005 1.4900e- , 003 r 0.0000 r3.6000e- 004 2.0000e- , 004 r 0.0000 r 0.0000 1.6900e- , 003 r 0.0000 r3.6000e- 004 4.3000e- , 004 r 0.0000 r 1.0000e- 004 1.9000e- 004 , r 0.0000 r 0.0000 6.2000e- i 0.0000 004 i i r '1 0.0000 1 0.0000 i i -. T 1.0000e- i 0.0000 004 j l • 9.1948 , 0.0000 0.5041 • 9.1948 • 0.0000 r • 0.5041 6.4000e- 004 , r 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 , 0.0000 t r 0.0000 , 9.2108 0.0000 0.5045 Total 0.0114 1.1700e- 003 0.0380 7.0900e- 003 1.1000e- 004 1.8500e- 003 2.0000e- 004 2.0500e- 003 5.3000e- 004 1.9000e- 004 7.2000e- 004 0.0000 9.6990 9.6990 6.6000e- 004 0.0000 9.7153 3.4 Building Construction - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road • 0.0114 0.1213 0.0760 1.3000e- 7.0600e- 7.0600e- 6.4900e- 6.4900e- i 0.0000 11.7087 11.7087 3.5900e- 0.0000 11.7984 004 003 003 003 003 j 003 , Total 0.0114 0.1213 0.0760 1.3000e- 7.0600e- 7.0600e- 6.4900e- 6.4900e- 0.0000 11.7087 11.7087 3.5900e- 0.0000 11.7984 004 003 003 003 003 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 15 of 28 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Annual 3.4 Building Construction - 2017 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Date: 11/11/2016 3:26 PM Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category MT/yr tons/yr MT/yr Hauling Vendor Worker • • • 0.0000 4.3000e- 004 1.5100e- 003 0.0000 r 0.0132 1.1800e- 003 0.0000 2.8300e- , 003 , 0.0121 0.0000 r3.0000e- 005 r3.0000e- 005 0.0000 �6.3000e- 004 r2.7500e- 003 0.0000 1.3000e- , 004 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 7.6000e- -1-- , 004 1r r2.7700e- 003 0.0000 , 004 7.3000e- 004 0.0000 -1- r1.2000e- , 004 2.0000e- , 005 0.0000 i 0.0000 i A T 3.0000e- + 0.0000 , 004 y A T 7.5000e- + 0.0000 004 + 0.0000 2.4974 1 2.5206 0.0000 r 2.4974 2.5206 0.0000 r2.3000e- , 004 r8.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 , r 0.0000 T , 0.0000 2.5032 2.5227 Total 0.0114 1.9400e- 003 0.0144 0.0149 6.0000e- 005 3.3800e- 003 1.5000e- 004 3.5300e- 003 9.1000e- 004 1.4000e- 004 1.0500e- 003 0.0000 5.0180 5.0180 3.1000e- 004 0.0000 5.0259 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road • 0.0114 0.1213 0.0760 1.3000e- 7.0600e- 7.0600e- 6.4900e- 6.4900e- + 0.0000 11.7087 11.7087 3.5900e- 0.0000 11.7984 , 004 , 003 003 003 003 1 003 , Total 0.0114 0.1213 0.0760 1.3000e- 7.0600e- 7.0600e- 6.4900e- 6.4900e- 0.0000 11.7087 11.7087 3.5900e- 0.0000 11.7984 004 003 003 003 003 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 16 of 28 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Annual 3.4 Building Construction - 2017 Mitigated Construction Off -Site Date: 11/11/2016 3:26 PM 3.5 Paving - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr • Hauling Vendor Worker w • •r • 0.0000 4.3000e- 004 1.5100e- 003 0.0000 -,- r 0.0132 r1.1800e- 003 0.0000 2.8300e- 003 0.0121 0.0000 r 3.0000e- , 005 r3.0000e- 005 0.0000 r 4.5000e- , 004 r1.7900e- 003 0.0000 r1.3000e- 004 r2.0000e- 005 0.0000 5.8000e- 004 r 1.8100e- 003 0.0000 r 1.4000e- 004 r 5.0000e- 004 0.0000 r 1.2000e- 004 r 2.0000e- , 005 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i -I r 2.6000e- i 0.0000 , 004 i i r 4 5.1000e- i 0.0000 , 004 i A 0.0000 7 2.4974 , 2.5206 0.0000 2.4974 2.5206 0.0000 r 2.3000e- , 004 8.0000e- , 005 0.0000 0.0000 , 0.0000 , 0.0000 t 2.5032 2.5227 Total 1.9400e- 003 0.0144 0.0149 6.0000e- 005 2.2400e- 003 1.5000e- 004 2.3900e- 003 6.4000e- 004 1.4000e- 004 7.7000e- 004 0.0000 5.0180 5.0180 3.1000e- 004 0.0000 5.0259 3.5 Paving - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr • Off -Road Paving T. •. •. ., 9.1800e- 003 ..- 3.6200e- 003 0.1027 , r 0.0658 r 1.1000e- 004 r , rr 5.5700e- 003 0.0000 5.5700e- , 003 0.0000 -, 5.1300e- 003 0.0000 5.1300e- i 0.0000 , 003 a i r i 0.0000 1 0.0000 i i 10.5524 0.0000 10.5524 r 0.0000 3.2300e- 003 r 0.0000 0.0000 , r t 0.0000 10.6332 0.0000 Total 0.0128 0.1027 0.0658 1.1000e- 004 5.5700e- 003 5.5700e- 003 5.1300e- 003 5.1300e- 003 0.0000 10.5524 ' 10.5524 3.2300e- 003 0.0000 10.6332 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 17 of 28 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Annual 3.5 Paving - 2017 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Date: 11/11/2016 3:26 PM Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 • 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor Worker w • w • • , 0.0000 3.9000e- 004 7 0.0000 3.1000e- 004 -, 0.0000 3.1300e- 003 -, 0.0000 �1.0000e- 005 7 0.0000 r, 7.1000e- 004 0.0000 r 0.0000 r 0.0000 7.2000e- , 004 r 0.0000 1.9000e- 004 r 0.0000 0.0000 i i i r 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 i i 4 1.9000e- 1 0.0000 004 j i , 0.0000 , 0.6554 0.0000 0.6554 - . 0.0000 . 2.0000e- 005 , 0.0000 0.0000 , 0.0000 0.6559 Total 3.9000e- 004 3.1000e- 004 3.1300e- 003 1.0000e- 005 7.1000e- 004 0.0000 7.2000e- 004 1.9000e- 004 0.0000 1.9000e- 004 0.0000 0.6554 0.6554 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.6559 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road • 9.1800e- . 0.1027 0.0658 1.1000e- 5.5700e- 5.5700e- 5.1300e- 5.1300e- + 0.0000 10.5524 10.5524 3.2300e- 0.0000 10.6332 003 004 003 003 003 003 1 003 , • n r r -, r , w -, , r 4 4 r r t Paving • 3.6200e- . 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 003 1 a Total 0.0128 0.1027 0.0658 1.1000e- 5.5700e- 5.5700e- 5.1300e• 5.1300e- 0.0000 10.5524 10.5524 3.2300e- 0.0000 10.6332 004 003 003 003 003 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 18 of 28 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Annual 3.5 Paving - 2017 Mitigated Construction Off -Site Date: 11/11/2016 3:26 PM 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile ROG NOx CO 302 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total - Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 . 1 r .,-, -. -. 7 r -1-, -, M 7 r Vendor • 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 l J Worker • 3.9000e- 3.1000e- 3.1300e- 1.0000e- r4.7000e- r 0.0000 4.7000e- 1.3000e- 0.0000 r 1.3000e- 1 0.0000 0.6554 0.6554 r2.0000e- 0.0000 0.6559 004 004 003 005 004 , 004 004 004 i 005 . y , Total 3.9000e- 3.1000e- 3.1300e- 1.0000e- 4.7000e- 0.0000 4.7000e- 1.3000e- 0.0000 1.3000e- 0.0000 0.6554 0.6554 2.0000e- 0.0000 0.6559 004 004 003 005 004 004 004 004 005 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 19 of 28 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Annual Date: 11/11/2016 3:26 PM ' ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Mitigated • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 i 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 : 0.0000 • 0.0000 i Unmitigated • 0.0000 T 0.0000 T 0.0000 T 0.0000 T 0.0000 T 0.0000 T 0.0000 0.0000 T 0.0000 T 0.0000 : 0.0000 : 0.0000 T 0.0000 T 0.0000 T 0.0000 : 0.0000 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information _ Ave age Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday H -S or C -C Annual VMT Primary I Diverted I Annual VMT Other Asphalt Surfaces•0.00 8.40 6.90 : 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ••• Total I 0.00 0.00 0.00 I I 4.3 Trip Type Information 4.4 Fleet Mix Land Use I LDA I LDT1 I LDT2 I MDV I LHD1 I LI -1132 I MHD I HHD I OBUS I UBUS I MCY I SBUS I MH Other Asphalt Surfaces • 0.527920: 0.040740 • 0.182967 • 0.130733 • 0.020108 • 0.005812 • 0.016781 • 0.065303 • 0.001324 • 0.001284 • 0.004728 • 0.000989 • 0.001311 5.0 Energy Detail Historical Energy Use: N Miles Trip % Trip Purpose % Land Use H -W or C -W H -S or C -C 1 H -O or C -NW H -W or C -W H -S or C -C H -O or C -NW Primary I Diverted I Pass -by Other Asphalt Surfaces 16.60 8.40 6.90 : 0.00 0.00 0.00 : 0 0 0 4.4 Fleet Mix Land Use I LDA I LDT1 I LDT2 I MDV I LHD1 I LI -1132 I MHD I HHD I OBUS I UBUS I MCY I SBUS I MH Other Asphalt Surfaces • 0.527920: 0.040740 • 0.182967 • 0.130733 • 0.020108 • 0.005812 • 0.016781 • 0.065303 • 0.001324 • 0.001284 • 0.004728 • 0.000989 • 0.001311 5.0 Energy Detail Historical Energy Use: N CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy Page 20 of 28 Date: 11/11/2016 3:26 PM Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Annual Category ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total tons/yr Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e MT/yr Electricity : 0.0000 • 0.0000 : • 0.0000 : 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated , ; a Electricity . . 0.0000 • 0.0000 • . 0.0000 T 0.0000 1 • 0.0000 Unmitigated ; a 1 7 7 4 NaturalGas . 0.0000 . 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 r Y T 0.0000 • 0.0000 • • 0.0000 • 0.0000 I 0.0000 Mitigated ; a 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 : 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.0000 : 0.0000 0.0000 • 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 r 0.0000 . 0.0000 . 0.0000 • TT 4. TTT • a TT TNaturalGas 0.0000 T 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 . 0.0000 T 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 • 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated , • • 0.0000 0.0000 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O Cote Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr Other Asphalt Surfaces 0 2 a, 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 3 a a 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 21 of 28 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Annual 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Mitigated Date: 11/11/2016 3:26 PM 5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Unmitigated NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 Cote Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr Other Asphalt Surfaces 0 2 + i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Unmitigated Electricity Use Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Land Use I kWh/yr MT/yr Other Asphalt Surfaces • 0 2 1 A 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Mitigated Page 22 of 28 Date: 11/11/2016 3:26 PM Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Annual 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area Electricity Use Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr Other Asphalt Surfaces 0 + a a 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2e 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr A Mitigated •• 9.5900e- • 1.0000e- . 1.5500e- . 0.0000 . • 1.0000e- • 1.0000e- . . 1.0000e- • 1.0000e- 003 005 003 ; 005 005 005 005 T T .1- 9.5900e- T 1.0000e- • 1.5500e- T 0.0000 T • 1.0000e- T 1.0000e- T -• 1.0000e- • 1.0000e- Unmitigated 003 005 003 005 005 005 005 a 0.0000 • 2.9800e- • 2.9800e- . 1.0000e- • 0.0000 • 3.1900e- j 003 003 005 ; 003 T T • 0.0000 • 2.9800e- T 2.9800e- T 1.0000e- • 0.0000 • 3.1900e- 003 003 005 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 23 of 28 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Annual 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated Date: 11/11/2016 3:26 PM Mitigated ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr Architectural • Coating it Consumer • Products w r Landscaping • 1.6700e- 003 7.7700e- 003 1.5000e- 004 r , r1.0000e- 005 r 1.5500e- 003 r 0.0000 r r 0.0000 r 0.0000 r1.0000e- 005 0.0000 r , 0.0000 r1.0000e- 005 r r , 0.0000 r 0.0000 r1.0000e- 005 0.0000 + 0.0000 + + r .. 0.0000 + 0.0000 + + 1 r 1.0000e- + 0.0000 005 + 0.0000 0.0000 2.9800e- 003 0.0000 r 0.0000 2.9800e- 003 0.0000 r 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 r t 0.0000 r 0.0000 T 0.0000 0.0000 3.1900e- 003 Total 9.5900e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.5500e- 003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.9800e- 003 2.9800e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.1900.- 003 Mitigated 7.0 Water Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e ii.SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr Architectural • Coating Consumer • Products Landscaping • 1.6700e- 003 w 7.7700e- 003 n 1.5000e- 004 r r 1.0000e- , 005 rr r 1.5500e- 003 r -. r 0.0000 r -. 0.0000 0.0000 1.0000e- , 005 0.0000 r 0.0000 r 1.0000e- , 005 r r , 0.0000 r 0.0000 r 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 + 0.0000 + r • 0.0000 + 0.0000 + + r • 1.0000e- + 0.0000 005 + 0.0000 r 0.0000 2.9800e- - 003 0.0000 r 0.0000 2.9800e- 003 0.0000 r 0.0000 r 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 r t 0.0000 r t 0.0000 , 0.0000 0.0000 3.1900e- 003 Total 9.5900e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.5500e- 003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.9800e- 003 2.9800e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.1900e- 003 7.0 Water Detail CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 24 of 28 Date: 11/11/2016 3:26 PM Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Annual 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 7.2 Water by Land Use Unmitigated Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category MT/yr Mitigated •: 0.0000 • 0.0000 ; 0.0000 i 0.0000 K -.- Unmitigated Unmitigated •: 0.0000 0.0000 : 0.0000 0.0000 7.2 Water by Land Use Unmitigated Indoor/Out door Use Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Land Use Mgal MT/yr Other Asphalt Surfaces 0 / 0 + 0.0000 +, a, 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 7.2 Water by Land Use Mitigated Page 25 of 28 Date: 11/11/2016 3:26 PM Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Annual 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste Category/Year Indoor/Out door Use Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Land Use Mgal MT/yr Other Asphalt Surfaces 0 / 0 + a, a 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste Category/Year Total CO2 CH4 N20 Cote MT/yr Mitigated :: 0.0000 ; 0.0000 i 0.0000 • 0.0000 t Unmitigated •: 0.0000 0.0000 T 0.0000 . 0.0000 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 8.2 Waste by Land Use Unmitigated Page 26 of 28 Date: 11/11/2016 3:26 PM Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Annual Mitigated Waste Disposed Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Land Use tons MT/yr Other Asphalt Surfaces i 0 2 a a 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day 1 Days/Year 1 Horse Power I Load Factor I Fuel Type Waste Disposed Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Land Use tons MT/yr Other Asphalt Surfaces . 0 2 a a 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day 1 Days/Year 1 Horse Power I Load Factor I Fuel Type CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 10.0 Stationary Equipment Page 27 of 28 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Annual Date: 11/11/2016 3:26 PM Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators Equipment Type 1 Number 1 Hours/Day 1 Hours/Year I Horse Power I Load Factor I Fuel Type Boilers Equipment Type INumber I Heat Input/Day I Heat Input/Year I Boiler Rating I Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type INumber 11.0 Vegetation CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 1.0 Project Characteristics Page 1 of 22 Date: 11/11/2016 3:23 PM Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Summer Pechanga Parkway Widening Riverside -South Coast County, Summer 1.1 Land Usage 1 Size 1 Other Asphalt Surfaces 120.15 1000sgft 2.76 120,151.00 0 Land Uses Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Climate Zone 10 Utility Company Southern California Edison Wind Speed (m/s) 2.4 CO2 Intensity 702.44 CH4 Intensity (Ib/MWhr) (IbIMWhr) 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non -Default Data 0.029 Precipitation Freq (Days) 28 Operational Year 2018 N20 Intensity (Ib/MWhr) 0.006 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 2 of 22 Date: 11/11/2016 3:23 PM Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Summer Project Characteristics - Land Use - Accounts for roadway expansion, curbs, gutters, median, bus turnout, sidewalks, and access ramps Construction Phase - Construction phase duration per project contractor Off-road Equipment - Off-road Equipment - Equipment list per project contractor Off-road Equipment - Construction equipment per project contractor Off-road Equipment - Equipment list per project contractor Off-road Equipment - Equipment list per project contractor Grading - Demolition - Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - SCAQMD Rule 403 Table Name tblConstDustMitigation tblConstDustMitigation tblConstructionPhase tblConstruction Phase tblConstruction Phase tblConstruction Phase tblConstruction Phase tblConstruction Phase tblConstruction Phase tblConstruction Phase tblConstruction Phase tblConstruction Phase tblConstruction Phase tblGrading Column Name C lean PavedRoad PercentReduction WaterUnpavedRoadVehicleSpeed NumDays NumDays NumDays PhaseEndDate PhaseEndDate PhaseEndDate PhaseEndDate PhaseStartDate PhaseStartDate PhaseStartDate PhaseStartDate MaterialExported 4- 4_ Y • 4- • T Y Default Value 0 40 220.00 20.00 6.00 10/25/2017 12/8/2016 12/21/2016 11/8/2017 12/22/2016 11/11/2016 12/14/2016 10/26/2017 New Value 40 15 10.00 15.00 10.00 5/19/2017 4/21/2017 5/5/2017 6/2/2017 5/6/2017 4/1/2017 4/22/2017 5/20/2017 • 0.00 1,973.00 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 3 of 22 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Summer Date: 11/11/2016 3:23 PM tblOffRoadEquipment tblOffRoadEquipment tblOffRoadEquipment tblOffRoadEquipment tblOffRoadEquipment tblOffRoadEquipment tblOffRoadEquipment tblOffRoadEquipment tblOffRoadEquipment tblOffRoadEquipment tblOffRoadEquipment tblOffRoadEquipment tblOffRoadEquipment tblOffRoadEquipment tblOffRoadEquipment tblOffRoadEquipment tblOffRoadEquipment tblOffRoadEquipment tblOffRoadEquipment tblOffRoadEquipment tblOffRoadEquipment tblOffRoadEquipment tblOffRoadEquipment tblOffRoadEquipment tblOffRoadEquipment tblOffRoadEquipment tblOffRoadEquipment LoadFactor 0.50 0.50 4 4 1 LoadFactor • 0.42 ii 0.42 LoadFactor Y 0.50 0.50 LoadFactor • 0.44 i 0.44 LoadFactor0.42 i 0.42 LoadFactor • i 0.42 i 0.42 4 LoadFactor 0.36 0.36 LoadFactor 0.38 i 0.38 i LoadFactor 0.30 + 0.30 4 4LoadFactor : 0.50 i 0.50 T OffRoadEquipmentType : + Trenchers OffRoadEquipmentTypet Other Construction Equipment OffRoadEquipmentType: t Trenchers OffRoadEquipmentType+ Off -Highway Tractors OffRoadEquipmentType t Other Construction Equipment OffRoadEquipmentTypei Other Construction Equipment OffRoadEquipmentTypet Paving Equipment OffRoadEquipmentType • t Rollers OffRoadEquipmentTypet Surfacing Equipment OffRoadEquipmentType + Trenchers OffRoadEquipmentType: i Surfacing Equipment OffRoadEquipmentType : i Other Construction Equipment : OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount • 1.00 i 0.00 OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount1.00 + 0.00 OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount :4 4 1.00 + 0.00 OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 t 0.00 4 OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount • 1.00 0.00 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 4 of 22 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Summer Date: 11/11/2016 3:23 PM tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount • 2.00 1.00 4 4 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 1 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment ▪ OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount • 1.00 + 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount T 3.00 + 1.00 tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount Y 2.00 t 1.00 tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount Y 1.00 t 0.00 ,I- 4 tblOffRoadEquipment • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 0.00 2.0 Emissions Summary CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 5 of 22 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Summer 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) Unmitigated Construction Date: 11/11/2016 3:23 PM Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Year Ib/day Ib/day 2017 •w 2.6883 27.0750 18.5407 0.0374 3.0739 1.4401 4.3576 0.5052 1.3258 1.7115 1 0.0000 3,894.410 3,894.410 0.8605 0.0000 3,911.117 27.0750 + 0 0 1 • 1.1356 1.4401 2.4194 0.2018 1.3258 1.4542 i 0.0000 + i 3,894.410 0 3,894.410 0 0.8605 i . 3,911.117 1 Maximum 2.6883 27.0750 18.5407 Maximum 2.6883 27.0750 18.5407 0.0374 3.0739 1.4401 4.3576 0.5052 1.3258 1.7115 0.0000 3,894.410 3,894.410 0.8605 0.0000 3,911.117 0 0 1 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Year Ib/day Ib/day 2017 • 2.6883 27.0750 18.5407 0.0374 1.1356 1.4401 2.4194 0.2018 1.3258 1.4542 i 0.0000 + i 3,894.410 0 3,894.410 0 0.8605 0.0000 . 3,911.117 1 Maximum 2.6883 27.0750 18.5407 0.0374 1.1356 1.4401 2.4194 0.2018 1.3258 1.4542 0.0000 3,894.410 0 3,894.410 0 0.8605 0.0000 3,911.117 1 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 63.06 0.00 44.48 60.05 0.00 15.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 6 of 22 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Summer 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational Date: 11/11/2016 3:23 PM Mitigated Operational _ ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day Area Energy Mobile Mobile • ••-, • • n • • 0.0529 0.0000 0.0000 1.2000e- 004 r 0.0000 rr 0.0000 0.0124 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -, r 0.0000 0.0000 r -• 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 r -, 0.0000 0.0000 4.0000e- , 005 -, 0.0000 r -. 0.0000 , -• 0.0000 4.0000e- , 005 0.0000 r 0.0000 4.0000e- + , 005 + i r 4 0.0000 1 A r -• 0.0000 1 i i . 0.0263 , 0.0000 0.0000 0.0263 0.0000 r 0.0000 7.0000e- , 005 r 0.0000 r -r- 0.0000 , + r 0.0000 0.0281 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0529 1.2000e- 004 0.0124 0.0000 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 0.0263 0.0263 7.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0281 Mitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 Cote Category Ib/day Ib/day Area Energy Mobile • w • • 0.0529 0.0000 0.0000 1.2000e- , 004 r -. 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.0124 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.0000 r -,-, 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 r 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 r 0.0000 r 0.0000 -,-,-, 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 r -.- 0.0000 0.0000 4.0000e- + , 005 y l 4 0.0000 1 t a r 4 0.0000 1 a A . 0.0263 7 0.0000 -, 0.0000 0.0263 0.0000 0.0000 7.0000e- 005 , r 0.0000 r 0.0000 , t 0.0000 t 0.0281 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0529 1.2000e- 004 0.0124 0.0000 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 0.0263 0.0263 7.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0281 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 7 of 22 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Summer Date: 11/11/2016 3:23 PM 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description Demolition 2 •Grading :Demolition :4/1/2017 :4/21/2017 ' 5' 15' T :Grading :4/22/2017 :5/5/2017 ' 5' 10: 4 4 3 :Building Construction :Building Construction .5/6/2017 :5/19/2017 : 5: 10: 1- 5/20/2017 .6/2/2017 5. 10 : 4 :Paving :Paving Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0 Acres of Paving: 2.76 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non -Residential Indoor: 0; Non -Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating - sqft) OffRoad Equipment Phase Name Demolition Paving Demolition Building Construction Building Construction Building Construction Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor :Trenchers 1 8.00 : H 1 I - •Cement and Mortar Mixers : 0 8.00: :Concrete/Industrial Saws . 11 8.00• : F 1 I - •Generator Sets : 0 8.00 :Cranes : 01 8.00: 4- + +- •Forklifts 0 7.00, 78: 9: 0.50 0.56 81: 0.73 84't 231: 0.74 0.29 89. 0.20 ROG NOx CO 502 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description Demolition 2 •Grading :Demolition :4/1/2017 :4/21/2017 ' 5' 15' T :Grading :4/22/2017 :5/5/2017 ' 5' 10: 4 4 3 :Building Construction :Building Construction .5/6/2017 :5/19/2017 : 5: 10: 1- 5/20/2017 .6/2/2017 5. 10 : 4 :Paving :Paving Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0 Acres of Paving: 2.76 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non -Residential Indoor: 0; Non -Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating - sqft) OffRoad Equipment Phase Name Demolition Paving Demolition Building Construction Building Construction Building Construction Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor :Trenchers 1 8.00 : H 1 I - •Cement and Mortar Mixers : 0 8.00: :Concrete/Industrial Saws . 11 8.00• : F 1 I - •Generator Sets : 0 8.00 :Cranes : 01 8.00: 4- + +- •Forklifts 0 7.00, 78: 9: 0.50 0.56 81: 0.73 84't 231: 0.74 0.29 89. 0.20 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 8 of 22 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Summer Date: 11/11/2016 3:23 PM • Demolition iOther Construction Equipment 1i 8.00i 1721 0.42 + +-------- -+ F Paving • Pavers u Or 8.00 . 130: 0.42 • Paving Rollers . 11 8.00. 80: 0.38 I F 1 ( I. - Demolition :Rubber Tired Dozers : Or 8.00. 247: 0.40 I 1- 1 ( • - Grading :Rubber Tired Dozers: Or 8.00. 247: 0.40 • Building Construction •Tractors/LoadersBackhoes . 11 6.00• 97: 0.37 = F i I- R Demolition •Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes : 11 8.00. 97: 0.37 • Grading •Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes . 11 7.00• 97: 0.37 = F i i. • - Paving :Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes : 1 i 8.00. 97: 0.37 • I. Grading :Trenchers I-11 8.00. 78: 0.50 • Grading :Graders I-01 8.00. 187: 0.41 Paving :Paving Equipment I-1 i 8.00• 132! 0.36 i• i i F - Grading :Off -Highway Tractors : 1 i 8.00. 124: 0.44 • Building Construction :Welders II- 01 8.00. 46: 0.45 • Grading :Other Construction Equipment . 1 1 8.00. 172: 0.42 Building Construction :Other Construction Equipment II- 11 8.00. 172: 0.42 Building Construction :Paving Equipment . 11 8.00. 132: 0.36 : I. Building Construction :Rollers . 11 8.00. 80: 0.38 Building Construction :Surfacing Equipment . 11 8.00. 263: 0.30 I. Building Construction :Trenchers . 11 8.00. 78: 0.50 S. Paving :Surfacing Equipment . 11 8.00. 263: 0.30 �- + • I. Paving :Other Construction Equipment 1: 8.00. 172: 0.42 Trips and VMT CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 9 of 22 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Summer Date: 11/11/2016 3:23 PM Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Building Construction • 6: Demolition • 41 • (- Grading •4 4 - Paving Paving 5; • 50.00 10.00 10.00 Hauling Trip Number Worker Trip Vendor Trip Length Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class 20.001 0.00: 14.701 6.90: 20.00: LD_Mix 1: HDT_Mix 1 HHDT 0.001 189.00: 14.701 6.90: 20.00:LD Mix IHDT_Mix 'HHDT 4 0.001 247.00, 14.701 6.90: 20.00!LD_Mix IHDT_Mix 1HHDT -1,- a_ + Y 4- 4 13.00: 0.00, 0.00. 14.70, 6.90: 20.00:LD_Mix ;HDT_Mix HHDT 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Use Soil Stabilizer Replace Ground Cover Water Exposed Area Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads Clean Paved Roads 3.2 Demolition - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day N Fugitive Dust 2.7416 0.0000 2.7416 0.4151 0.0000 0.4151 1 0.0000 0.0000 a n r r w -. • r T w r y Off -Road •. 2.0547 18.8455 13.0921 0.0189 1.2630 1.2630 1.1865 1.1865 1 1,882.890 T ,882.890r 0.4475 1,894.076 i 3 3 9 • 1 Total 2.0547 18.8455 13.0921 0.0189 2.7416 1.2630 4.0046 0.4151 1.1865 1.6016 1,882.890 1,882.890 0.4475 1,894.076 3 3 9 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 10 of 22 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Summer 3.2 Demolition - 2017 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Date: 11/11/2016 3:23 PM Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day Ib/day Hauling Vendor Worker • • • • 0.0873 • 0.0000 n-,7 0.0669 3.7429 r , 0.0000 x 0.0438 0.4456 , 0.0000 0.5613 9.8600e- 003 r 0.0000 x1.2100e- 003 0.2205 -, x 0.0000 x 0.1118 0.0201 0.0000 7.2000e- 004 0.2406 r , 0.0000 r 0.1125 , 0.0604 7 0.0000 r i 0.0296 . 0.0192 . 0.0000 • 6.6000e- ; 004 . 0.0797 I i it y = 0.0000 1 l r y • 0.0303 1 ; + 1 1,044.587 7 0.0000 120.7472 1,044.587 7 r 0.0000 x120.7472 0.0691 -, x 0.0000 x4.0500e- 003 + x T , 1,046.314 6 0.0000 120.8486 Total 0.1542 3.7867 1.0069 0.0111 0.3323 0.0208 0.3531 0.0901 0.0199 0.1100 1.3241 1,165.335 0 1,165.335 0 0.0731 0.4475 1,167.163 2 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust 0.9089 • 0.0000 • 0.9089 0.1376 0.0000 0.1376 i 0.0000 0.0000 i i l , r 4 • r r T Off -Road • x x 2.0547 18.8455 13.0921 •- r w -, •. 0.0189 • 1.2630 • 1.2630 1.1865 1.1865 I 0.0000 1,882.890 1,882.890 0.4475 1,894.076 + 3 3 9 i Total 2.0547 18.8455 13.0921 0.0189 0.9089 1.2630 2.1718 0.1376 1.1865 1.3241 0.0000 1,882.890 1,882.890 0.4475 1,894.076 3 3 9 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 11 of 22 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Summer 3.2 Demolition - 2017 Mitigated Construction Off -Site Date: 11/11/2016 3:23 PM 3.3 Grading - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day Ib/day Hauling Vendor Worker • • • • 0.0873 0.0000 0.0669 3.7429 r -.r 0.0000 0.0438 0.4456 0.0000 r 0.5613 9.8600e- 003 r -i 0.0000 r1.2100e- , 003 0.1538 0.0000 r 0.0729 0.0201 0.0000 7.2000e- 004 0.1739 r• 0.0000 r 0.0736 0.0441 r 0.0000 r 0.0201 0.0192 r 0.0000 r6.6000e- 004 0.0633 + i r y 0.0000 1 J t T 0.0208 1 i y 1,044.587 7 -, 0.0000 -ir4.0500e- 120.7472 1,044.587 7 0.0000 '- 120.7472 0.0691 0.0000 003 r t T , 1,046.314 6 0.0000 120.8486 Total 1.7732 0.1542 3.7867 1.0069 0.0111 0.2268 0.0208 0.2475 0.0642 0.0199 0.0841 1,725.939 1,165.335 0 1,165.335 0 0.0731 1,739.159 1,167.163 2 3.3 Grading - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust 0.0250 0.0000 0.0250 3.7800e- 0.0000 3.7800e- i 0.0000 0.0000 003 , , 003 1 _ l '1,725.939'1,725.939 Off -Road • 1.7732 r 18.0382 r 12.1476 r 0.0169 r 1.1229 r 1.1229 r r 1.0331 T 1.0331 1 1,725.939 1,725.939r 0.5288 '- T 1,739.159 i 2 2 , 8 Total 1.7732 18.0382 12.1476 0.0169 0.0250 1.1229 1.1479 3.7800e- 1.0331 1.0369 1,725.939 1,725.939 0.5288 1,739.159 003 2 2 8 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 12 of 22 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Summer 3.3 Grading - 2017 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Date: 11/11/2016 3:23 PM Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day . T Ib/day Hauling . Vendor Worker • nr • 0.1712 M 0.0000 0.0669 7.3372 rr 0.0000 0.0438 0.8734 x 0.0000 x 0.5613 0.0193 0.0000 x1.2100e- 003 0.4322 r = 0.0000 r 0.1118 0.0394 x 0.0000 7.2000e- , 004 0.4716 r 0.0000 x 0.1125 0.1185 r 0.0000 x 0.0296 0.0377 x 0.0000 6.6000e- 004 , 0.1562 i 1 r 4 0.0000 i i i • r 0.0303 + 1 i 2,047.723 6 r 1 0.0000 120.7472 2,047.723 6 0.0000 x120.7472 0.1354 '1 x 0.0000 x4.0500e- 003 T x T , 2,051.108 7 0.0000 120.8486 Total 0.2381 7.3811 1.4348 0.0205 0.5440 0.0401 0.5841 0.1481 0.0383 0.1865 1.0343 2,168.470 8 2,168.470 8 0.1395 0.5288 2,171.957 3 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust 8.2800e- 0.0000 8.2800e- 1.2500e- 0.0000 . 1.2500e- + 0.0000 0.0000 003 , 003 003 003 1 a • n x r r r r r r 1 -i r r T Off -Road • 1.7732 r 18.0382 12.1476 0.0169 x 1.1229 1.1229 1.0331 • 1.0331 j 0.0000 1,725.939 1,725.939 0.5288 1,739.159 1 2 2 8 i Total 1.7732 18.0382 12.1476 0.0169 8.2800e- 1.1229 1.1312 1.2500e- 1.0331 1.0343 0.0000 1,725.939 1,725.939 0.5288 1,739.159 003 003 2 2 8 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 13 of 22 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Summer 3.3 Grading - 2017 Mitigated Construction Off -Site Date: 11/11/2016 3:23 PM 3.4 Building Construction - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day w Ib/day Hauling Vendor Worker • 0.1712 • 0.0000 1,- • 0.0669 • 7.3372 0.0000 T 0.0438 0.8734 T 0.0000 T 0.5613 • 0.0193 r 0.0000 •1.2100e- 003 0.3016 T 0.0000 T 0.0729 0.0394 T 0.0000 T7.2000e- 004 0.3409 T 0.0000 T 0.0736 0.0864 T 0.0000 T 0.0201 0.0377 T 0.0000 T6.6000e- 004 0.1241 i + i T 0.0000 I i y T 0.0208 i i i . 2,047.723 6 0.0000 120.7472 2,047.723 6 T 0.0000 T120.7472 i 0.1354 r 0.0000 -• r4.0500e- : 003 , T T T 2,051.108 7 0.0000 120.8486 Total 0.2381 7.3811 1.4348 0.0205 0.3745 0.0401 0.4146 0.1065 0.0383 0.1449 1.4111 2,168.470 8 2,168.470 8 0.1395 1.2982 2,171.957 3 3.4 Building Construction - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day A Off -Road • 2.2697 24.2535 15.2035 0.0252 1.4111 1.4111 1.2982 1.2982 1 2,581.330 2,581.330 0.7909 2,601.103 i 4 , 4 , , 3 • i Total 2.2697 24.2535 15.2035 0.0252 1.4111 1.4111 1.2982 1.2982 2,581.330 2,581.330 0.7909 2,601.103 4 4 3 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 14 of 22 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Summer 3.4 Building Construction - 2017 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Date: 11/11/2016 3:23 PM Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day Ib/day i 4 4 , 3 Hauling Vendor Worker • .1 it • • 0.0000 0.0843 -,-y 0.3343 . 0.0000 i .1".. r 2.6024 . 0.2191 0.0000 0.5305 '- 2.8067 0.0000 r 5.3100e- , 003 6.0700e- 003 0.0000 r 0.1281 , '- 0.5589 0.0000 r 0.0254 3.5800e- 003 0.0000 r 0.1535 '- 0.5625 0.0000 r 0.0369 '- 0.1482 0.0000 r 0.0243 '-3.3000e- 003 0.0000 i i i r t 0.0612 1 ft 1 i i r 0.1515 1 i i 0.0000 .-559.1294 603.7362 0.0000 r 559.1294 '-603.7362 0.0000 r -I 0.0493 '- 0.0203 T r T i 0.0000 . 560.3618 604.2430 Total 2.2697 0.4186 2.8215 3.3372 0.0114 0.6870 0.0290 0.7160 0.1851 0.0276 0.2127 2,581.330 1,162.865 6 1,162.865 6 0.0696 2,601.103 1,164.604 7 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road • 2.2697 24.2535 15.2035 0.0252 1.4111 1.4111 1.2982 1.2982 + 0.0000 2,581.330 2,581.330 0.7909 2,601.103 i 4 4 , 3 i Total 2.2697 24.2535 15.2035 0.0252 1.4111 1.4111 1.2982 1.2982 0.0000 2,581.330 2,581.330 0.7909 2,601.103 4 4 3 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 15 of 22 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Summer 3.4 Building Construction - 2017 Mitigated Construction Off -Site Date: 11/11/2016 3:23 PM 3.5 Paving - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i Vendor I. r r r r•r r r r i 0.0843 2.6024 r 0.5305 5.3100e- 0.0916 0.0254 0.1170 r 0.0279 0.0243 0.0522 i 559.1294 ' 559.1294 r 0.0493 T 560.3618 003 , y a Worker _ • r 4 w -, -, -, 0.3343 r 0.2191 r 2.8067 6.0700e- r 0.3645 3.5800e- r 0.3681 0.1005 3.3000e- r 0.1038 1 603.7362 603.7362 r 0.0203 T 604.2430 003 , , 003 , , 003 , y Total 2.5589 20.5337 Total 0.0228 0.4186 2.8215 3.3372 0.0114 0.4561 0.0290 0.4851 0.1284 0.0276 0.1561 1,162.865 1,162.865 0.0696 1,164.604 9 9 6 6 7 3.5 Paving - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road • 1.8358 20.5337 13.1558 . 0.0228 . 1.1148 1.1148 1.0257 1.0257 1 2,326.400 2,326.400 0.7128 2,344.221 i 9 , 9 , 1 i Paving n r ' r r -e r 4 r r -e- • 0.7231 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 i 1 Total 2.5589 20.5337 13.1558 0.0228 1.1148 1.1148 1.0257 1.0257 2,326.400 2,326.400 0.7128 2,344.221 9 9 1 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 16 of 22 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Summer 3.5 Paving - 2017 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Date: 11/11/2016 3:23 PM Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling Vendor Worker • w • 0.0000 Mr 0.0000 -r 0.0869 0.0000 r 0.0000 r 0.0570 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.7297 0.0000 l 0.0000 r1.5800e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 r 0.1453 0.0000 r 0.0000 r 9.3000e- 004 0.0000 r 0.0000 r 0.1462 0.0000 r l 0.0000 r 0.0385 0.0000 0.0000 r8.6000e- 004 0.0000 i i i r 4 0.0000 i i I 4 r 0.0394 + i • 0.0000 l 0.0000 156.9714 0.0000 0.0000 r 156.9714 0.0000 7 r 0.0000 r5.2700e- 003 T T , 0.0000 0.0000 157.1032 Total 0.0869 0.0570 0.7297 1.5800e- 003 0.1453 9.3000e- 004 0.1462 0.0385 8.6000e- 004 0.0394 2.5589 156.9714 156.9714 5.2700e- 003 157.1032 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road • 1.8358 20.5337 13.1558 0.0228 1.1148 1.1148 . 1.0257 1.0257 I 0.0000 2,326.400 2,326.400 0.7128 2,344.221 1 9 9 1 L , , , r ' , , r i a r r t Paving • 0.7231 0.0000 0.0000 • 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i I Total 2.5589 20.5337 13.1558 0.0228 1.1148 1.1148 1.0257 1.0257 0.0000 2,326.400 2,326.400 0.7128 2,344.221 9 9 1 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 17 of 22 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Summer 3.5 Paving - 2017 Mitigated Construction Off -Site Date: 11/11/2016 3:23 PM 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day A Hauling • 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 J J Vendor r -. r -. -. r r r • r r -. r • 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 J r r r r -I,• r r • r9.3000e- r5.2700e- r Worker 0.0869 0.0570 0.7297 1.5800e- 0.0948 0.0957 0.0261 8.6000e- 0.0270 I 156.9714 156.9714 157.1032 003 004 , 004 ± 003 , • y Total 0.0869 0.0570 0.7297 1.5800e- 0.0948 9.3000e- 0.0957 0.0261 8.6000e- 0.0270 156.9714 156.9714 5.2700e- 157.1032 003 004 004 003 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile CatEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 18 of 22 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Summer Date: 11/11/2016 3:23 PM 4.2 Trip Summary Information ROG • NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day Mitigated •• 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 ± 0.0000 i 0.0000 • 0.0000 0.0000 i -• r Unmitigated • 0.0000 0.0000 T 0.0000 T 0.0000 T 0.0000 T 0.0000 T 0.0000 T 0.0000 T 0.0000 T 0.0000 • • 0.0000 T 0.0000 T 0.0000 T • 0.0000 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Ave age Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Trip % Mitigated Land Use Trip Purpose % Weekday Saturday Sunday H -S or C -C Annual VMT H -W or C -W Annual VMT Other Asphalt Surfaces•0.00 Primary I Diverted 0.00 0.00 •• 6.90 • 0.00 Total 0.00 0 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 I I 4.3 Trip Type Information 4.4 Fleet Mix Land Use I LDA I LDT1 I LDT2 I MDV I LHD1 I LHD2 I MHD I HHD I OBUS I UBUS I MCY I SBUS I MH Other Asphalt Surfaces : 0.527920• 0.040740: 0.182967: 0.130733: 0.020108: 0.005812: 0.016781: 0.065303: 0.001324: 0.001284: 0.004728 • 0.000989: 0.001311 5.0 Energy Detail Historical Energy Use: N Miles Trip % Trip Purpose % Land Use H -W or C -W H -S or C -C H -O or C -NW H -W or C -W H -S or C -C H -O or C -NW Primary I Diverted Pass -by Other Asphalt Surfaces 16.60 8.40 6.90 • 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 4.4 Fleet Mix Land Use I LDA I LDT1 I LDT2 I MDV I LHD1 I LHD2 I MHD I HHD I OBUS I UBUS I MCY I SBUS I MH Other Asphalt Surfaces : 0.527920• 0.040740: 0.182967: 0.130733: 0.020108: 0.005812: 0.016781: 0.065303: 0.001324: 0.001284: 0.004728 • 0.000989: 0.001311 5.0 Energy Detail Historical Energy Use: N CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy Page 19 of 22 Date: 11/11/2016 3:23 PM Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Summer 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day NaturalGas . 0.0000 . 0.0000 , 0.0000 . 0.0000 . . 0.0000 . 0.0000 . , 0.0000 . 0.0000 1 . 0.0000 . 0.0000 , 0.0000 . 0.0000 . 0.0000 Mitigated , , , 1 • i .TTTT TT i 'T TNaturalGas .0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 T 0.0000 T 0.0000 T 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 T 0.0000 0.0000 . 0.0000 Unmitigated 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr Ib/day Ib/day Other Asphalt Surfaces . 0 2 +, A 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 1 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 20 of 22 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Summer 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Mitigated Date: 11/11/2016 3:23 PM 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr Ib/day Ib/day Other Asphalt 0 2 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Surfaces i.4 4. i Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day Mitigated . 0.0529 . 1.2000e- , 0.0124 . 0.0000 . . 4.0000e- . 4.0000e- . . 4.0000e- . 4.0000e- i . 0.0263 . 0.0263 . 7.0000e- . . 0.0281 004 : 005 005 005 005 ± 005 i T T ♦ r Unmitigated . 0.0529 T 1.2000e- T 0.0124 T 0.0000 • . 4.0000e- T 4.0000e- T T 4.0000e- T 4.0000e- • • 0.0263 T 0.0263 T 7.0000e- T . 0.0281 004 005 005 005 005 005 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 21 of 22 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Summer 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated Date: 11/11/2016 3:23 PM Mitigated ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e SubCategory Ib/day Ib/day Architectural • Coating it Consumer • Products w r Landscaping • 9.1500e- 003 0.0426 1.1900e- 003 . r • r1.2000e- 004 r r 0.0124 r r 0.0000 r 0.0000 r 0.0000 r 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 r 0.0000 r 4.0000e- � 005 r 0.0000 r 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 j a 3 r • 0.0000 1 a a 4 r 4.0000e- a 005 a 0.0263 0.0000 , r 0.0000 • 0.0263 7.0000e- 005 r t r t , 0.0000 0.0000 0.0281 Total 0.0529 1.2000e- 004 0.0124 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 0.0263 0.0263 7.0000e- 005 0.0281 Mitigated 7.0 Water Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e SubCategory Ib/day Ib/day Architectural • Coating Consumer Products Landscaping • 9.1500e- 003 • 0.0426 1.1900e- 003 , r -. 1.2000e- 004 -. 7 0.0124 0.0000 r rr 0.0000 r 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 r -, 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 -. 7 0.0000 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 i a a r 4 0.0000 i a a r 4 4.0000e- I 005 a a -, 0.0263 0.0000 0.0000 r 0.0263 r -1 7.0000e- 005 t t , 0.0000 0.0000 0.0281 Total 0.0529 1.2000e- 004 0.0124 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 0.0263 0.0263 7.0000e- 005 0.0281 7.0 Water Detail CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 22 of 22 Date: 11/11/2016 3:23 PM Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Summer 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day 1 Days/Year Horse Power I Load Factor I Fuel Type 10.0 Stationary Equipment Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators Equipment Type INumber I Hours/Day Hours/Year 1 Horse Power I Load Factor I Fuel Type Boilers Equipment Type Number I Heat Input/Day I Heat Input/Year I Boiler Rating I Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number 11.0 Vegetation CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 1.0 Project Characteristics Page 1 of 23 Date: 12/8/2016 9:12 AM Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Winter Pechanga Parkway Widening Riverside -South Coast County, Winter 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Other Asphalt Surfaces 1 Size 1 Metric I Lot Acreage I Floor Surface Area I Population 120.15 1000sgft 2.76 120,151.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Climate Zone 10 Utility Company Southern California Edison Wind Speed (m/s) 2.4 CO2 Intensity 702.44 CH4 Intensity (Ib/MWhr) (Ib/MWhr) 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non -Default Data 0.029 Precipitation Freq (Days) 28 Operational Year 2018 N20 Intensity (Ib/MWhr) 0.006 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 2 of 23 Date: 12/8/2016 9:12 AM Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Winter Project Characteristics - Land Use - Accounts for roadway expansion, curbs, gutters, median, bus turnout, sidewalks, and access ramps Construction Phase - Construction phase duration per project contractor Off-road Equipment - Off-road Equipment - Equipment list per project contractor Off-road Equipment - Construction equipment per project contractor Off-road Equipment - Equipment list per project contractor Off-road Equipment - Equipment list per project contractor Demolition - Grading - Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - SCAQMD Rule 403 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 3 of 23 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Winter Date: 12/8/2016 9:12 AM Table Name tblConstDustM itigation tblConstDustM itigation tblConstructionPhase tblConstructionPhase tblConstructionPhase tblGrading tblLandUse tblLandUse tblOffRoadEquipment tblOffRoadEquipment tblOffRoadEquipment tblOffRoadEquipment tblOffRoadEquipment tblOffRoadEquipment tblOffRoadEquipment tblOffRoadEquipment tblOffRoadEquipment tblOffRoadEquipment tblOffRoadEquipment tblOffRoadEquipment Column Name Default Value New Value • CleanPavedRoadPercentReduction 0 1 40 i • WaterUnpavedRoadVehicleSpeed 40 t 15 NumDays • 220.00 t 10.00 NumDays 20.00 + 15.00 NumDays Y 6.00 t 10.00 MaterialExported 0.00 t 1,973.00 BuildingSpaceSquareFeet 120,150.00 f 120,151.00 LandUseSquareFeet • 120,150.00 + 120,151.00 OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount • 1.00 + 0.00 OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount • 1.00 i 0.00 OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount Y 2.00 i 0.00 OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 -it 0.00 OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount • 1.00 + 0.00 • OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount Y 2.00 t 1.00 OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount • 1.00 t 0.00 OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount Y 1.00 + 0.00 OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 t 1.00 OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 t 1.00 r 4 OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 0.00 2.0 Emissions Summary CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 4 of 23 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Winter 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) Unmitigated Construction Date: 12/8/2016 9:12 AM Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Year Ib/day Ib/day 2016 •, 2.8842 29.2360 18.7019 0.0371 3.0739 1.5508 4.4686 0.5052 1.4280 1.8174 I 0.0000 3,887.173 3,887.173 0.8728 0.0000 3,904.551 + 1 1 7 t r r r r r r r r r y r "-2,467.274 2017 .. 2.6437 20.5928 13.7509 0.0242 0.1453 1.1158 1.2611 r 0.0385 1.0265 1.0651 ± 0.0000 2,467.274 2,467.274 0.7174 r 0.0000 2,485.209 t 3 , 3 7 •, 1.5508 r 1.1158 2.6358 r 1.2611 0.2277 r 0.0385 1.4280 r 1.0265 1.6131 i 0.0000 t A r y 1.0651 1 0.0000 A t 3,887.173 1 2,467.274_ 3 3,887.173 1 2,467.274 3 0.8728 r 0.7174 0.0000 r 0.0000 T t Maximum 2.8842 29.2360 18.7019 0.0371 Maximum 2.8842 29.2360 18.7019 0.0371 3.0739 1.5508 4.4686 0.5052 1.4280 1.8174 0.0000 3,887.173 3,887.173 0.8728 0.0000 3,904.551 1 1 7 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Year Ib/day Ib/day 2016 • . 2017 • • 2.8842 � 2.6437 29.2360 20.5928 18.7019 13.7509 0.0371 r 0.0242 1.2411 r 0.1453 1.5508 r 1.1158 2.6358 r 1.2611 0.2277 r 0.0385 1.4280 r 1.0265 1.6131 i 0.0000 t A r y 1.0651 1 0.0000 A t 3,887.173 1 2,467.274_ 3 3,887.173 1 2,467.274 3 0.8728 r 0.7174 0.0000 r 0.0000 T 3,904.551 7 2,485.209 7 Maximum 2.8842 29.2360 18.7019 0.0371 1.2411 1.5508 2.6358 0.2277 1.4280 1.6131 0.0000 3,887.173 1 3,887.173 1 0.8728 0.0000 3,904.551 7 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 56.93 0.00 31.99 51.04 0.00 7.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 5 of 23 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Winter 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational Date: 12/8/2016 9:12 AM Mitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day A Ib/day 1 Area Energy Mobile • .,r • n • 0.0529 0.0000 0.0000 1.2000e- 004 r 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.0124 r 0.0000 r -. 0.0000 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.0000 r-, 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 r 0.0000 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 r 0.0000 0.0000 r r 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 r 0.0000 r 0.0000 4.0000e- + 005 + r 0.0000 i r 0.0000 1 0.0263 0.0000 -, 0.0000 0.0263 r 0.0000 0.0000 7.0000e- 005 -1.1 r 0.0000 r -.-a 0.0000 0.0000 s 0.0281 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0529 1.2000e- 004 0.0124 0.0000 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 Total 0.0263 0.0263 7.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0281 Mitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day Area • 0.0529 1.2000e- 0.0124 0.0000 4.0000e- 4.0000e- 4.0000e- 4.0000e- +0.0263 0.0263 7.0000e- 0.0281 004 005 005 , , 005 , 005 + 005 , r r r r r r r r -.r r r • t Energy • 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 . 0.0000 r r r , r - r i r r r r Mobile • 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ? 0.0000 Total 0.0529 1.2000e- 0.0124 0.0000 0.0000 4.0000e- 4.0000e- 0.0000 4.0000e- 4.0000e- 0.0263 0.0263 7.0000e- 0.0000 0.0281 004 005 005 005 005 005 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 6 of 23 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Winter Date: 12/8/2016 9:12 AM 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 •Demolition :Demolition '11/11/2016 :12/1/2016 ' 5' 15' 1 1 4 4 4 4 2 :Grading :Grading ' 12/2/2016 :12/15/2016 : 5' 10' s 1 1 44 4 4 3 :Building Construction :Building Construction .12/16/2016 112/29/2016 ' 5' 101 + 4. -' 4 :Paving :Paving '12/30/2016 '1/12/2017 5: 10: Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0 Acres of Paving: 2.76 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non -Residential Indoor: 0; Non -Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating - sqft) OffRoad Equipment Phase Name Demolition Demolition Demolition Demolition Demolition Grading Offroad Equipment Type I Amount ;Concrete/Industrial Saws ' C i - :Other Construction Equipment ' :Rubber Tired Dozers F 1 1- • Tractors/LoadersBackhoes H • Trenchers ;Graders 11 11 of 11 Usage Hours I Horse Power I 8.00' ----4 Load Factor 81' 0.73 8.00' 172 11 4- 8.00: 247' F 1. 8.00. 97' F 8.00 , 78: 4 0: 8.00: 187: 0.42 0.40 0.37 0.50 0.41 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 •Demolition :Demolition '11/11/2016 :12/1/2016 ' 5' 15' 1 1 4 4 4 4 2 :Grading :Grading ' 12/2/2016 :12/15/2016 : 5' 10' s 1 1 44 4 4 3 :Building Construction :Building Construction .12/16/2016 112/29/2016 ' 5' 101 + 4. -' 4 :Paving :Paving '12/30/2016 '1/12/2017 5: 10: Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0 Acres of Paving: 2.76 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non -Residential Indoor: 0; Non -Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating - sqft) OffRoad Equipment Phase Name Demolition Demolition Demolition Demolition Demolition Grading Offroad Equipment Type I Amount ;Concrete/Industrial Saws ' C i - :Other Construction Equipment ' :Rubber Tired Dozers F 1 1- • Tractors/LoadersBackhoes H • Trenchers ;Graders 11 11 of 11 Usage Hours I Horse Power I 8.00' ----4 Load Factor 81' 0.73 8.00' 172 11 4- 8.00: 247' F 1. 8.00. 97' F 8.00 , 78: 4 0: 8.00: 187: 0.42 0.40 0.37 0.50 0.41 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 7 of 23 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Winter Date: 12/8/2016 9:12 AM Grading •Off -Highway Tractors 1 : 8.00:.1241 0.44 % 1-1-- 4 E Grading :Other Construction Equipment : 11 8.00. 172: 0.42 s 1- 1 (- Grading :Rubber Tired Dozers : 0 i 8.00. 247: 0.40 i F 1 1 - Grading •Tractors/LoadersBackhoes 1 i 7.00: 97: 0.37 = F 1 (- Grading :Trenchers : 1 i 8.00: 78: 0.50 Building Construction :Cranes I-01 8.00,I- .00. 231: 0.29 i 1- 1 1 - Building Construction :Forklifts : 0i 7.00, 89: 0.20 Building Construction :Generator Sets I-01 8.00. 84: 0.74 Building Construction :Other Construction Equipment I-11 8.00.I- .00. 172: 0.42 = 1- 1 1- Building Construction :Paving Equipment : 1 i 8.00. 132: 0.36 Building Construction :Rollers F -1i 8.00. 80: 0.38 Building Construction :Surfacing Equipment I -1i 8.00. 263: 0.30 t F 1(- Building Construction •Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes : 1 i 6.00. 97: 0.37 Building Construction :Trenchers I-1 1 8.00 • 78: 0.50 Building Construction :Welders I-01 8.00.I- .00• 46: 0.45 = 1- 1 (- Paving :Cement and Mortar Mixers : 0i 8.00. 9: 0.56 I. Paving :Other Construction Equipment I-11 8.00. 172: 0.42 I H 1 I- 1• Paving :Pavers : 0 i 8.00. 130: 0.42 i. Paving :Paving Equipment I-11 8.00. 132: 0.36 i F 1 H 1 Paving :Rollers : 1 8.00. 80: 0.38 1. Paving :Surfacing Equipment . 1 8.00. 263: 0.30 :- + � 1 - Paving •Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1: 8.00' 97 0.37 Trips and VMT CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 8 of 23 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Winter Date: 12/8/2016 9:12 AM Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length 1 1 1 1 Demolition 4' 10.00' 0.00 189.00'' 14.70' 6.90' 20.00' LD - , Mix 'HDT- Mix 'HHDT ' I ' , Grading • 4 F 10.00: 0.00' 247.00: 1470' 6.90: 20.00: LD Mix I HDT Mix 'HHDT 4 Building Construction : 6' 50.00: 20.001 0.00: 14.70 6.90: 20.00:LD_Mix :HDT Mix 'HHDT 1- + 4- T 4- 4- T 4- + Paving • 5' 13.00' 0.00' 0.00' 14.70' 6.90' 20.00'LD_Mix 'HDT_Mix :HHDT • Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Use Soil Stabilizer Replace Ground Cover Water Exposed Area Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads 3.2 Demolition - 2016 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust 2.7416 0.0000 2.7416 0.4151 0.0000 0.4151 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 i w -. w r-. r r • T Off -Road • 2.1973 20.0369 13.2079 0.0189 1.3601 1.3601 1.2790 1.2790 i 1,909.174 1,909.174 0.4545 1,920.535 I 0 0 , 6 j Total 2.1973 20.0369 13.2079 0.0189 2.7416 1.3601 4.1017 0.4151 1.2790 1.6941 1,909.174 1,909.174 0.4545 1,920.535 0 0 6 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 9 of 23 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Winter 3.2 Demolition - 2016 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Date: 12/8/2016 9:12 AM Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category , Ib/day Ib/day Ib/day Hauling Vendor Worker • • • 0.1141 w- 0.0000 w- 0.0728 4.1991 x 0.0000 r 0.0521 0.6048 r 0.0000 0.5211 9.6900e- 003 r 0.0000 1.1200e- , 003 0.2205 , x 0.0000 x 0.1118 , 0.0339 r 0.0000 7.4000e- 004 0.2544 r 0.0000 -r-r4 x 0.1125 , • 0.0605 r 0.0000 x 0.0296 0.0324 x 0.0000 6.9000e- , 004 0.0929 a 1 i r -6r 0.0000 i i A T 0.0303 t j A 1,026.039 7 0.0000 111.2826 1,026.039 7 0.0000 x111.2826 0.0810 r 0.0000 x4.0400e- 003 r t x T , 1,028.065 6 0.0000 111.3836 Total 0.0189 0.1869 4.2512 1.1259 0.0108 0.3323 0.0347 0.3669 0.0901 0.0331 0.1232 1,137.322 3 1,137.322 3 0.0851 1,139.449 2 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO 502 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day , Ib/day Fugitive Dust • • Off -Road • • w r 2.1973 20.0369 13.2079 0.0189 0.9089 0.0000 r 1.3601 0.9089 1.3601 0.1376 0.0000 1.2790 0.1376 i A A r y 1.2790 1 0.0000 + A 1,909.174'1 0 0.0000 ,909.174r , 0 0.4545 r T 0.0000 1,920.535 6 Total 2.1973 20.0369 13.2079 0.0189 0.9089 1.3601 2.2689 0.1376 1.2790 1.4166 0.0000 1,909.174 0 1,909.174 0 0.4545 1,920.535 6 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 10 of 23 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Winter 3.2 Demolition - 2016 Mitigated Construction Off -Site Date: 12/8/2016 9:12 AM 3.3 Grading - 2016 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day Ib/day Hauling Vendor Worker A • w r • • . 0.1141 0.0000 0.0728 4.1991 r 0.0000 0.0521 0.6048 0.0000 r 0.5211 9.6900e- 003 r 0.0000 r1.1200e- 003 0.2205 , r 0.0000 r 0.1118 , 0.0339 r 0.0000 r7.4000e- 004 , 0.2544 r 0.0000 r 0.1125 0.0605 r 0.0000 -. r 0.0296 0.0324 0.0000 6.9000e- 004 0.0929 1 j i r y 0.0000 1 1J J 4 r 0.0303 t j t 1,026.039 7 -, 0.0000 111.2826 1,026.039 7 0.0000 111.2826 0.0810 -, r 0.0000 r4.0400e- 003 t T , 1,028.065 6 0.0000 111.3836 Total 0.0170 0.1869 4.2512 1.1259 0.0108 0.3323 0.0347 0.3669 0.0901 0.0331 0.1232 1,137.322 3 1,137.322 3 0.0851 1,139.449 2 3.3 Grading - 2016 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust • Off -Road • • 1.8844 19.3488 12.2855 r 0.0170 . 0.0250 r i 0.0000 1.2018 0.0250 r 1.2018 3.7800e- 003 0.0000 , 1.1056 ■ 3.7800e- 1 003 + a r 4 1.1056 i 1 4 1,764.527 0 0.0000 1,764.527 , 0 r 0.5322 r T 0.0000 1,777.833 , 1 Total 1.8844 19.3488 12.2855 0.0170 0.0250 1.2018 1.2268 3.7800e- 003 1.1056 1.1094 1,764.527 0 1,764.527 0 0.5322 1,777.833 1 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 11 of 23 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Winter 3.3 Grading - 2016 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Date: 12/8/2016 9:12 AM Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 0114 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day Ib/day Hauling 0.2237 8.2316 1.1855 0.0190 0.4322 0.0665 0.4987 0.1185 0.0636 0.1821 i 2,011.363 2,011.363 0.1589 2,015.334 • , 003 , 003 , 003 , 003 + + 5 5 9 Vendor • • 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.0000 T 0.0000 r 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.0000 T 0.0000 I 0.0000 It r 0.0000 r 0.0000 T 0.0000 J Worker • • 0.0728 w 0.0521 0.5211 r1.1200e- r 0.1118 r7.4000e- r 0.1125 r 0.0296 6.9000e- T 0.0303 I 111.2826 111.2826 r4.0400e- T 111.3836 . 1 003 , 0 004 , 1 , 004 i y 19.3488 12.2855 , 003 , 1.2018 Total 1.2500e- 0.2965 8.2837 1.7067 0.0201 0.5440 0.0672 0.6112 0.1481 0.0643 0.2124 2,122.646 2,122.646 0.1629 2,126.718 003 0 0 1 1 1 5 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day A Fugitive Dust • 8.2800e- 0.0000 8.2800e- 1.2500e- 0.0000 1.2500e- i 0.0000 0.0000 • , 003 , 003 , 003 , 003 + Off -Road • 1.8844 19.3488 12.2855 0.0170 r 1.2018 r 1.2018 r 1.1056 T 1.1056 1 0.0000 1,764.527 1,764.527,- ,764.527r 0.5322 T 1,777.833 • 1 0 , 0 1 Total 1.8844 19.3488 12.2855 0.0170 8.2800e- 1.2018 1.2101 1.2500e- 1.1056 1.1069 0.0000 1,764.527 1,764.527 0.5322 1,777.833 003 003 0 0 1 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 12 of 23 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Winter 3.3 Grading - 2016 Mitigated Construction Off -Site Date: 12/8/2016 9:12 AM 3.4 Building Construction - 2016 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day Ib/day Hauling Vendor Worker • 0.2237 • 0.0000 0.0728 8.2316 0.0000 0.0521 1.1855 0.0000 0.5211 0.0190 0.0000 1.1200e- 003 0.4322 0.0000 0.1118 , 0.0665 0.0000 7.4000e- , 004 , 0.4987 = 0.0000 r 0.1125 0.1185 r 0.0000 r 0.0296 0.0636 0.0000 6.9000e- , 004 0.1821 i + i 0.0000 1 i i T 0.0303 1 1 i . 2,011.363 5 0.0000 111.2826 2,011.363 5 0.0000 111.2826 0.1589 0.0000 r4.0400e- 003 , 2,015.334 9 0.0000 T 111.3836 Total 0.2965 8.2837 1.7067 0.0201 0.5440 0.0672 0.6112 0.1481 0.0643 0.2124 1.5137 2,122.646 1 2,122.646 1 0.1629 2,126.718 5 3.4 Building Construction - 2016 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day A Off -Road • 2.4162 26.1621 15.4081 0.0253 1.5137 1.5137 1.3926 1.3926 1 2,630.378 2,630.378 0.7934 2,650.214 i 6 6 0 i Total 2.4162 26.1621 15.4081 0.0253 1.5137 1.5137 1.3926 1.3926 2,630.378 2,630.378 0.7934 2,650.214 6 6 0 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 13 of 23 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Winter 3.4 Building Construction - 2016 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Date: 12/8/2016 9:12 AM Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day Ib/day Hauling Vendor Worker • • • • 0.0000 w 0.1041 0.3639 0.0000 -, r 2.8133 r 0.2606 0.0000 0.6883 2.6056 , 0.0000 r5.1200e- 003 5.6000e- 003 0.0000 r ., 0.1281 0.5589 0.0000 0.0334 3.7200e- 003 0.0000 r -, 0.1615 0.5626 , 0.0000 0.0369 0.1482 0.0000 r 0.0320 3.4300e- , 003 0.0000 i a a r .. 0.0689 1 a t T 0.1517 1 a a 0.0000 538.1460 556.4130 0.0000 _ 538.1460 556.4130 0.0000 r 0.0592 r 0.0202 • 0.0000 T 539.6266 T 556.9181 Total Total 0.4680 3.0738 3.2938 0.0107 0.6870 0.0372 0.7241 0.1851 0.0354 0.2205 0.0000 1,094.559 0 1,094.559 0 0.0794 1,096.544 7 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road • 2.4162 26.1621 15.4081 0.0253 1.5137 1.5137 1.3926 1.3926 1 0.0000 2,630.378 2,630.378 0.7934 2,650.214 a 6 , 6 , , 0 a Total 2.4162 26.1621 15.4081 0.0253 1.5137 1.5137 1.3926 1.3926 0.0000 2,630.378 2,630.378 0.7934 2,650.214 6 6 0 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 14 of 23 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Winter 3.4 Building Construction - 2016 Mitigated Construction Off -Site Date: 12/8/2016 9:12 AM 3.5 Paving - 2016 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day Ib/day Hauling Vendor Worker • . • w • 0.0000 , 0.1041 0.3639 0.0000 -, 2.8133 , r 0.2606 0.0000 , 0.6883 2.6056 0.0000 5.1200e- , 003 5.6000e- , 003 0.0000 rr 0.1281 r 0.5589 , • 0.0000 • 0.0334 • 3.7200e- ' 003 • 0.0000 r 0.1615 r 0.5626 0.0000 0.0369 0.1482 0.0000 r 0.0320 3.4300e- 003 • 0.0000 ± i i r y 0.0689 i y i y T 0.1517 + i i 0.0000 538.1460 556.4130 0.0000 538.1460 556.4130 0.0000 r 0.0592 r 0.0202 T T 0.0000 539.6266 556.9181 Total 2.6825 0.4680 3.0738 3.2938 0.0107 0.6870 0.0372 0.7241 0.1851 0.0354 0.2205 2,360.565 1,094.559 0 1,094.559 0 0.0794 2,378.366 1,096.544 7 3.5 Paving - 2016 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CI -14 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road 1.9594 i 22.2283 i 13.2680 i 0.0227 1.2040 1.2040 1.1077 1.1077 i 2,360.565 2,360.565 0.7120 2,378.366 3 3 0 1 i Paving • n w 0.7231 , ' , 0.0000 -. 0.0000 , 0.0000 r i 0.0000 1 i- 0.0000 r r 0.0000 Total 2.6825 22.2283 13.2680 0.0227 1.2040 1.2040 1.1077 1.1077 2,360.565 2,360.565 0.7120 2,378.366 3 3 0 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 15 of 23 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Winter 3.5 Paving - 2016 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Date: 12/8/2016 9:12 AM Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i ; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i : T Vendor • 00000. r 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.0000 T 0.0000 1 0.0000: 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.0000 J Worker • 0.0946 r 0.0677 0.6774 ,-- ,-- r 0.1453 9.7000e- r 0.1463 r 0.0385 8.9000e- T 0.0394 1 144.6674 144.6674 r5.2500e- T 144.7987 003 004 004 i 003 , • Total 2.6825 22.2283 l 0.0227 1.2040 1.2040 Total 1.1077 0.0946 0.0677 0.6774 1.4600e- 0.1453 9.7000e- 0.1463 0.0385 8.9000e- 0.0394 144.6674 144.6674 5.2500e- 144.7987 3 3 003 004 004 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road 1.9594 22.2283 13.2680 0.0227 1.2040 1.2040 1.1077 1.1077 10.0000 2,360.565 2,360.565 0.7120 2,378.366 3 3 0 • r - T Paving • 0.7231 r r r 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 T 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 i Total 2.6825 22.2283 13.2680 0.0227 1.2040 1.2040 1.1077 1.1077 0.0000 2,360.565 2,360.565 0.7120 2,378.366 3 3 0 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 16 of 23 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Winter 3.5 Paving - 2016 Mitigated Construction Off -Site Date: 12/8/2016 9:12 AM 3.5 Paving - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road Paving A 1.8358 w 0.7231 20.5337 w Hauling • 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 . 0.0000 0.0000 ± 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 A 1.1148 r ' 0.0000 • r r w -, , -, , -, r y 7 T r Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2,326.400 9 0.0000 t r 4 Worker 4x144.6674 • 0.0946 0.0677 0.6774 r1.4600e- r 0.1453 r9.7000e- r 0.1463 r 0.0385 8.9000e- r 0.0394 t 144.6674 r5.2500e- t 144.7987 2.5589 , 003 , 004 , , 004 j 003 , 0.0228 1.1148 1.1148 1.0257 1.0257 2,326.400 9 2,326.400 9 0.7128 t 2,344.221 1 Total 0.0946 0.0677 0.6774 1.4600e- 0.1453 9.7000e- 0.1463 0.0385 8.9000e- 0.0394 144.6674 144.6674 5.2500e- 144.7987 003 004 004 003 3.5 Paving - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day 1 Ib/day Off -Road Paving • • • • 1.8358 w 0.7231 20.5337 w 13.1558 r -,r 0.0228 1.1148 0.0000 1.1148 r ' 0.0000 1.0257 w 0.0000 1.0257 1 t t r * 0.0000 1 t t 2,326.400 9 4 2,326.400 9 0.0000 0.7128 w r 4 2,344.221 , 1 0.0000 Total 2.5589 20.5337 13.1558 0.0228 1.1148 1.1148 1.0257 1.0257 2,326.400 9 2,326.400 9 0.7128 2,344.221 1 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 17 of 23 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Winter 3.5 Paving - 2017 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Date: 12/8/2016 9:12 AM Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling Vendor Worker • • • • 0.0000 0.0000 0.0848 0.0000 r -, 0.0000 0.0591 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.5951 0.0000 0.0000 1.4200e- , 003 0.0000 r -. 0.0000 r 0.1453 0.0000 0.0000 9.3000e- 004 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.1462 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.0385 0.0000 r 0.0000 8.6000e- 004 0.0000 1 i i T y 0.0000 1 i i T 0.0394 i i i 0.0000 7 0.0000 140.8733 0.0000 0.0000 140.8733 0.0000 r 0.0000 r4.6100e- , 003 r T , 0.0000 0.0000 T 140.9886 Total 0.0848 0.0591 0.5951 1.4200e- 003 0.1453 9.3000e- 004 0.1462 0.0385 8.6000e- 004 0.0394 0.0000 140.8733 140.8733 4.6100e- 003 140.9886 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road Paving • •, • • A 1.8358 0.7231 . 20.5337 .• 13.1558 T 0.0228 r . r 7 i 1.1148 0.0000 1.1148 r 0.0000 r 7 1.0257 0.0000 1.0257 i 0.0000 A i T y 0.0000 i i i 2,326.400 • 9 . , 2,326.400 , 9 r 0.0000 • 0.7128 1 r , 2,344.221 1 0.0000 Total 2.5589 20.5337 13.1558 0.0228 1.1148 1.1148 1.0257 1.0257 0.0000 2,326.400 9 2,326.400 9 0.7128 2,344.221 1 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 18 of 23 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Winter 3.5 Paving - 2017 Mitigated Construction Off -Site Date: 12/8/2016 9:12 AM 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day - Ib/day Hauling Vendor Worker :: • n • 0.0000 0.0000 -.r 0.0848 0.0000 r -. 0.0000 0.0591 0.0000 0.0000 0.5951 0.0000 r 0.0000 1.4200e- 003 0.0000 r , 0.0000 r 0.1453 0.0000 1 0.0000 r 9.3000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 r-. 0.1462 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.0385 0.0000 r 0.0000 r8.6000e- 004 0.0000 i J i r 4 0.0000 1 J i r 0.0394 1 j i 0.0000 r 7 0.0000 140.8733 0.0000 0.0000 140.8733 0.0000 r 0.0000 r4.6100e- 003 r t r T , 0.0000 0.0000 140.9886 Total 0.0848 0.0591 0.5951 1.4200e- 003 0.1453 9.3000e- 004 0.1462 0.0385 8.6000e- 004 0.0394 140.8733 140.8733 4.6100e- 003 140.9886 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 19 of 23 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Winter Date: 12/8/2016 9:12 AM 4.2 Trip Summary Information ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 ' PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 Co2e Category Ib/day - Ib/day Mitigated • 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 • 0.0000 i 0.0000 ; 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 M Unmitigated •. 0.0000 T 0.0000 T 0.0000 T 0.0000 . 0.0000 T 0.0000 T 0.0000 • 0.0000 T 0.0000 T 0.0000 ; 0.0000 ; 0.0000 . 0.0000 1 ; 0.0000 • , 0.0000 T 0.0000 T 0.0000 T . 0.0000 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Ave age Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Trip % Mitigated Land Use Trip Purpose % Weekday Saturday Sunday H -S or C -C Annual VMT H -W or C -W Annual VMT Other Asphalt Surfaces•0.00 Primary 0.00 0.00 •• , 8.40 Total 0.00 I 0.00 0.00 0.00 I I 4.3 Trip Type Information 4.4 Fleet Mix Land Use I LDA I LDT1 I LDT2 I MDV I LHD1 I LHD2 I MHD I HHD I OBUS I UBUS I MCY I SBUS I MH Other Asphalt Surfaces : 0.527920• 0.040740: 0.182967 • 0.130733 • 0.020108: 0.005812: 0.016781: 0.065303: 0.001324: 0.001284: 0.004728: 0.000989: 0.001311 5.0 Energy Detail Historical Energy Use: N Miles Trip % Trip Purpose % Land Use H -W or C -W H -S or C -C H -O or C -NW H -W or C -W H -S or C -C H -O or C -NW Primary I Diverted Pass -by Other Asphalt Surfaces 16.60 , 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 : 0 0 0 4.4 Fleet Mix Land Use I LDA I LDT1 I LDT2 I MDV I LHD1 I LHD2 I MHD I HHD I OBUS I UBUS I MCY I SBUS I MH Other Asphalt Surfaces : 0.527920• 0.040740: 0.182967 • 0.130733 • 0.020108: 0.005812: 0.016781: 0.065303: 0.001324: 0.001284: 0.004728: 0.000989: 0.001311 5.0 Energy Detail Historical Energy Use: N CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2O16.3.1 Page 20 of 23 Date: 12/8/2016 9:12 AM Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Winter 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day NaturalGas . 0.0000 . 0.0000 i 0.0000 • 0.0000 i • 0.0000 • 0.0000 . . 0.0000 i 0.0000 � • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 . 0.0000 • 0.0000 Mitigated, ; ; a ; ; ; • T T NaturalGas . 0.0000 T 0.0000 T 0.0000 T 0.0000 T T 0.0000 T 0.0000 T , 0.0000 T 0.0000 • r 0.0000 T 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 , 0.0000 Unmitigated 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr Ib/day Ib/day Other Asphalt Surfaces 0 : a a 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i a 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 21 of 23 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Winter 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Mitigated Date: 12/8/2016 9:12 AM 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr Ib/day Ib/day Other Asphalt Surfaces . 0 + a, a. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 a a 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day Mitigated 0.0529 1.2000e- 0.0124 0.0000 . 4.0000e- . 4.0000e- . . 4.0000e- . 4.0000e- a . 0.0263 . 0.0263 . 7.0000e- . ! 0.0281 004 005 005 005 : 005 + 005 a T T •T Unmitigated .. 0.0529 T 1.2000e- T 0.0124 T 0.0000 T T 4.0000e- • 4.0000e- T T 4.0000e- • 4.0000e- • . 0.0263 T 0.0263 T 7.0000e- T • 0.0281 004 005 005 005 005 005 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 22 of 23 Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Winter 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated Date: 12/8/2016 9:12 AM Mitigated ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e SubCategory Ib/day Ib/day Architectural • 9.1500e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 Coating 003 y M r r - - 7 r , r r t r 7 7 r Consumer • 0.0426 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 Products A A r1.2000e- r Landscaping • 1.1900e- 0.0124 r 0.0000 r 4.0000e- r4.0000e- 4.0000e- r 4.0000e- + 0.0263 0.0263 4 -Ir7.0000e- r T 0.0281 003 004 005 005005 005 ± 005 , . A r r r 1 7 y r Landscaping • r r r 1.1900e- 1.2000e- 0.0124 0.0000 4.0000e- 4.0000e- 4.0000e- 4.0000e- + 0.0263 0.0263 7.0000e- 0.0281 003 , 004 , 005 005 , 005 005 j , 005 . y y Total 0.0529 1.2000e- 0.0124 0.0000 0.0529 4.0000e- 4.0000e- 0.0000 4.0000e- 4.0000e- 4.0000e- 0.0263 0.0263 7.0000e- 0.0281 0.0263 7.0000e- 004 0.0281 005 005 005 005 005 005 005 Mitigated 7.0 Water Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e SubCategory Ib/day Ib/day Architectural • 9.1500e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 Coating 003 + a • w r r r r r r r 4 r r r t Consumer • 0.0426 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 Products A A r r r 1 7 y r Landscaping • r r r 1.1900e- 1.2000e- 0.0124 0.0000 4.0000e- 4.0000e- 4.0000e- 4.0000e- + 0.0263 0.0263 7.0000e- 0.0281 003 , 004 , 005 005 , 005 005 j , 005 . y , Total 0.0529 1.2000e- 0.0124 0.0000 4.0000e- 4.0000e- 4.0000e- 4.0000e- 0.0263 0.0263 7.0000e- 0.0281 004 005 005 005 005 005 7.0 Water Detail CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 23 of 23 Date: 12/8/2016 9:12 AM Pechanga Parkway Widening - Riverside -South Coast County, Winter 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type INumber 1 Hours/Day I Days/Year 1 Horse Power I Load Factor I Fuel Type 10.0 Stationary Equipment Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators Equipment Type INumber 1 Hours/Day I Hours/Year 1 Horse Power I Load Factor I Fuel Type Boilers Equipment Type 1 Number I Heat Input/Day I Heat Input/Year I Boiler Rating I Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type INumber 11.0 Vegetation City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening Appendix B: Habitat Assessment/MSHCP Consistency Analysis December 2016 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Michael Baker INTERNATIONAL December 2, 2016 CITY OF TEMECULA Contact: William Becerra 41000 Main Street Temecula, California 92590 Innovation Done Right...We Make a Difference SUBJECT: Habitat Assessment and Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) Consistency Analysis for the Pechanga Parkway Widening Project Introduction Michael Baker International (Michael Baker) conducted a habitat assessment for the Pechanga Parkway Widening Project located in the City of Temecula, Riverside County, California (project site or site). Michael Baker biologist Travis J. McGill inventoried and evaluated the condition of the habitat within the proposed project footprint on November 14, 2016. The site investigation was conducted to characterize existing site conditions and to assess the probability of occurrence of special -status' plant and wildlife species that could pose a constraint to implementation of the proposed project. Special attention was given to the suitability of the habitat on-site to support burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia) and other sensitive species identified by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife's (CDFW) California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB), Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP), and other electronic databases as sensitive and as potentially occurring in the vicinity of the project site. Proiect Location and Setting The proposed Pechanga Parkway Widening Project (proposed project) located in the City of Temecula within southwestern Riverside County, California (refer to Exhibit 1, Regional Vicinity Map). The proposed project site is depicted on the Pechanga quadrangle of the United States Geological Survey's (USGS) 7.5 - minute topographic map series in an unsectiond portion of Township 8 south, Range 2 west. Specifically, the project is located along, and adjacent to, the existing Pechanga Parkway alignment from Via Gilberto to North Casino Drive (refer to Exhibit 2, Local Vicinity Map). The objective of the proposed project is to widen Pechanga Parkway from a four lane (110 feet width) facility to six lanes (134 feet width) generally between Via Gilberto and North Casino Drive in order to accommodate existing and predicted traffic demands and uphold the City of Temecula's goals to reduce 1 As used in this report, "special -status" refers to plant and wildlife species that are federally or State listed, proposed, or candidates; plant species that have been designated a California Native Plant Society (CNPS) Rare Plant Rank; listed under the MSHCP; and wildlife species that are designated by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) as fully protected, species of special concern, or watch list species. MBAKERINTL.COM 40810 Country Center Drive, Suite 2001 Temecula, CA 92591 Office 951.676-80421 Fax: 951-6767240 December 2, 2016 Page 2 of 10 traffic congestion, improve safety on roadways, and provide better access to regional transportation routes. Due to the expansion of the Pechanga Resort & Casino and continued residential development along Pechanga Parkway, additional roadway capacity to meet existing and future needs was identified. The project site, which includes an approximately 3,500 foot segment of the existing roadway, consists of improved road right-of-way (ROW), as well as pedestrian facilities and an existing flood control channel. There are a number of overhead and underground utilities which serve the surrounding area that are located within the existing road right of way. These utilities include a fiber optics cable, electrical, gas, storm drain, sewer, recycled and domestic water. A number of the existing aboveground utility appurtenances (street lighting and signals) will need to be relocated during the construction process. Additionally, the flood control facilities that run parallel to Pechanga Parkway will require modification to accommodate the widened roadway. According to the City of Temecula General Plan, the parcels adjacent to the project site include Low Medium Density Residential (LM) and Specific Plan (SP) to the north, Tribal Trust Lands (TTL) and SP to the south, LM and TTL to the west, and SP to the East. According to the City of Temecula General Plan Land Use Map, the parcels adjacent to the project site are designated as LM to the north, LM and TTL to the south, LM and TTL to the west, and LM, Medium Density Residential (MD), Neighborhood Commercial (NC), and Community Commercial (CC) to the east. Project Background Incorporated in 1989, the City of Temecula ("City") celebrated its 25th anniversary of incorporation on December 1, 2014. The City is located in southwestern Riverside County and is known as one of the fastest growing cities in California. Currently, the City is home to over 106,000 residents and spans over 37.18 square miles. According to the City of Temecula General Plan, the city was planned in a manner that would preserve and enhance high quality living while preserving the topography of the surrounding area. Temecula is known as the heart of Southern California wine country due to the expansive viticulture -related land uses in the eastern regions of the city. Pechanga Parkway functions as a primary north -south arterial for the southern portion of the City of Temecula circulation network. In response to high traffic volumes, the proposed project would continue the 2009 Pechanga Parkway Phase II Improvements that widened Pechanga Parkway to a six -lane facility from State Route 79 South (Temecula Parkway) to Via Gilberto and a four -lane facility from Via Gilberto to Wolf Valley Road. Proiect Characteristics The project proposes the widening of Pechanga Parkway from a four lane (110 feet width) facility to six lanes (134 feet width). The roadway widening would occur along a segment of the existing roadway, spanning approximately 3,600 feet. The improvements would extend from approximately 320 feet north of Via Gilberto to approximately 320 feet south of North Casino Drive (refer to Exhibits 3a — 3d, Site Plan). As the roadway exists, it includes four travel lanes in each direction, a landscaped center median, and left hand turn lanes for access to Via Eduardo/Wolf Valley Road, Casino Drive, and Pechanga Resort Drive. The existing roadway also included sidewalk throughout the project area, as well as bike lanes in both Pechanga Parkway Widening Project Habitat Assessment and MSHCP Consistency Analysis Michael Baker INTERNATIONAL December 2, 2016 Page 3 of 10 directions, with the exception of on the southbound roadway along the frontage of the Pechanga Resort and Casino. The proposed widening would include the following modifications to the roadway: • Construction to accommodate the addition of new travel lanes; • Construction of two (2) additional travel lanes; • Addition of new center median curb and landscaping; • Installation of a fiber optics cable; • Re -locating streetlights and traffic signals. The proposed roadway widening would expand the Pechanga Parkway Phase II improvements that occurred in 2009 which widened Pechanga Parkway to a six -lane facility from State Route 79 South (Temecula Parkway) to Via Gilberto and a four -lane facility from Via Gilberto to Wolf Valley Road. The roadway widening aims at to expand the existing improvements to alleviate traffic along Pechanga Parkway and further the long-term transportation needs identified by the City of Temecula General Plan. Besides the widening of Pechanga Parkway from four lanes to six lanes, the project also includes curb, gutter, sound wall, sidewalk, landscaping, irrigation, and storm drain improvements. Project construction would occur over six months beginning in spring. Construction activities would include site mobilization, demolition, minor grading, installation activities, and repaving activities (repaving, striping). Methodology A literature review and records search was conducted to determine which sensitive biological resources have the potential to occur on or within the general vicinity of the project site. In addition to the literature review, a general habitat assessment or site investigation of the project site was conducted. The field survey provided information on the existing conditions on the site and its potential to support sensitive biological resources. Literature Review Prior to conducting a field visit, a literature review and records search was conducted for sensitive biological resources potentially occurring on or within the general vicinity of the project site. Previously recorded occurrences of special -status plant and wildlife species and their proximity, specifically within 2 miles, to the project site were determined through a query of the CDFWs CNDDB Rarefind 5 software, the California Native Plant Society's (CNPS) Electronic Inventory of Rare, Threatened, and Endangered Plants of California, Calflora Database, compendia of special -status species published by the CDFW, and United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) species listings. The Riverside County Integrated Project (RCIP) Conservation Summary Report Generator was queried to determine if the MSHCP identifies any potential survey requirements for the project site (refer to Attachment B). Additionally, the proposed project site was reviewed against the MSHCP to determine if the site is located within any MSHCP areas including Criteria Cells (core habitat and wildlife movement corridors) and areas proposed for conservation. Pechanga Parkway Widening Project Habitat Assessment and MSHCP Consistency Analysis Michael Baker INTERNATIONAL December 2, 2016 Page 4 of 10 Field Investigation Following the literature review, biologists Travis J. McGill inventoried and evaluated the extent and conditions of the plant communities found within the boundaries of the proposed project tank on November 14, 2016. In addition, Mr. McGill identified any jurisdictional features, riparian/riverine habitat, as well as natural corridors and linkages that may support the movement of wildlife through the area. Special attention was given to any sensitive habitats and/or undeveloped areas, which have higher potentials to support sensitive flora and fauna species. Areas having the potential to provide suitable habitat for burrowing owl were closely surveyed for signs of presence during the habitat assessment. All plant and wildlife species observed, as well as dominant plant species within each plant community, were recorded. Wildlife detections were made through observation of scat, trails, tracks, burrows, nests, and/or visual and aural observation. In addition, site characteristics such as soil condition, topography, hydrology, anthropogenic disturbances, indicator species, condition of on-site plant communities, and presence of potential jurisdictional drainage and/or wetland features as well as riparian/riverine areas were noted. Plant communities identified on aerial photographs during the literature review were verified by walking meandering transects through the project site. The plant communities were evaluated for their potential to support sensitive plant and wildlife species. All plant and wildlife species observed, as well as dominant plant species, were recorded in a standardized field notebook. In addition, site characteristics such as soil condition, topography, presence of indicator species, slope, conditions of the plant communities, hydrology, jurisdictional features, and evidence of human use of the site were noted. Existing Site Condition The project site is relatively flat with no areas of significant topographic relief. The on-site elevation ranges from approximately 1,050 to 1,100 feet above mean sea level. According to the USDA Soil Survey, on-site soils consist of Greenfiled sandy loam (0 to 2 percent slopes), Gorgonio loamy sand (0 to 8 percent slopes), Ramona and Buren sandy loams (15 to 25 percent slopes, severely eroded), and Hanford fine sandy loam (0 to 2 percent slopes). The project site occurs in an area that has primarily been converted from natural habitats into residential and commercial land uses. Residential homes and the Pechanga Resort and Casino boarder the project site to the south, and residential homes and vacant fields border the project site to the north. The proposed widening alignment is surrounded by existing development which has removed natural plant communities from the surrounding area. The proposed project will be confined to existing paved streets, and landscaped areas. Vegetation On-site and surrounding land uses have eliminated the naturally occurring habitats around the project footprint, reducing the suitability of the habitat to support sensitive plant and wildlife species. As a result of existing development, undisturbed native plant communities are no longer present within the boundaries of the project site. Pechanga Parkway Widening Project Habitat Assessment and MSHCP Consistency Analysis Michael Baker INTERNATIONAL December 2, 2016 Page 5 of 10 The proposed widening alignment will be installed within the existing paved roads and landscaped areas. No plant natural communities will be affected from installation of the proposed pipeline alignments. Wildlife The project site provides limited habitat for wildlife species adapted to a high degree of human presence and development. The majority of the wildlife observed during the habitat assessment consisted of avian species. Six (6) avian species were detected which included house finch (Haemorhous mexicanus), black phoebe (Sayornis nigricans), mourning dove (Zenaida macroura), European starling (Sturnus vulgaris), rock pigeon (Columba livia), and Anna's hummingbird (Calypte anna). No mammals were detected during the habitat assessment. However, mammalian species expected to occur on the project site are those adapted to continual human presence and development (e.g. California ground squirrel (Otospermophilus beecheyi), opossum (Didelphis virginiana) and deer mouse (Peromyscus sp.)). The project site provides limited habitat for reptilian species acclimated to human presence and disturbance. No reptiles were detected during the habitat assessment, however, reptilian species expected to occur include western fence lizard (Sceloporus occidentalis), alligator lizard (Elgaria coerulea), and side - blotched lizard (Uta stansburiana). No fish or amphibians were observed on the project site during the habitat assessment. No hydrogeomorphic features (e.g. creeks, ponds, lakes, reservoirs) that would provide suitable habitat for fish or amphibian populations were observed on the project site. Therefore, no fish or amphibian species are expected to occur on-site and are presumed absent. Nestin>s Birds The ornamental plant communities adjacent to the proposed widening alignmens have the potential to provide suitable nesting, foraging, and cover habitat for year-round and seasonal avian residents, and migrating songbirds that could occur in the area. No nesting birds or breeding behaviors were observed during the field survey. Mi ratory Corridors and Linkages Habitat linkages provide connections between larger habitat areas that are separated by development. Wildlife corridors are similar to linkages, but provide specific opportunities for animals to disperse or migrate between areas. A corridor can be defined as a linear landscape feature of sufficient width to allow animal movement between two comparatively undisturbed habitat fragments. Adequate cover is essential for a corridor to function as a wildlife movement area. It is possible for a habitat corridor to be adequate for one species yet still inadequate for others. Wildlife corridors are features that allow for the dispersal, seasonal migration, breeding, and foraging of a variety of wildlife species. Additionally, open space can provide a buffer against both human disturbance and natural fluctuations in resources. The proposed widening alignment is surrounded by existing development which has removed natural plant communities from the surrounding area. The proposed project will be confined to existing paved streets and landscaped areas. As a result, the proposed project will not disrupt or have any adverse effects on any Pechanga Parkway Widening Project Habitat Assessment and MSHCP Consistency Analysis Michael Baker INTERNATIONAL December 2, 2016 Page 6 of 10 migratory corridors or linkages in the surrounding area. Additionally, the project site is not located within any MSHCP identified corridor or linkage. Jurisdictional Areas There are three key agencies that regulate activities within inland streams, wetlands, and riparian areas in California. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) Regulatory Branch regulates discharge of dredge or fill materials into "waters of the United States" pursuant to Section 404 of the Federal Clean Water Act (CWA) and Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act. Of the State agencies, the CDFW regulates alterations to streambed and bank under Fish and Wildlife Code Sections 1600 et seq., and the Regional Water Quality Control Board (Regional Board) regulates discharges into surface waters pursuant to Section 401 of the CWA and the California Porter -Cologne Water Quality Control Act. No jurisdictional drainage features or isolated wetland features that would qualify as "waters of the United States" or "waters of the state" are located within the proposed project footprint. It should be noted that Wolf Valley Creek Channel is located immediately north of the proposed project footprint. Wolf Valley Creek Channel receives flows from urban runoff and direct precipitation. Water in this channel flows from southeast to northwest, north of the project site, and eventually flows into Temecula Creek. Wolf Creek Valley Channel is primarily earthen -lined throughout most of its reach, with concrete and riprap armoring at the various road bridge crossings. The slopes of Wolf Valley Creek Channel are artificially maintained, and planted with ornamental grass. The active channel (low flow channel) of Wolf Valley Creek supports cattails (Typha sp.), and California bulrush (Schoenoplectus californicus). Although artificially created, Wolf Valley Creek Channel will likely be considered jurisdictional by the Corps, Regional Board, and CDFW. Based on current design plans, the proposed widening alignment not is anticipated to impact Wolf Valley Creek Channel. However, if during final design impacts to Wolf Valley Creek Channel will occur, the City of Temecula will need to have formal jurisdictional delineation prepared delineate the limits of jurisdiction and calculate the anticipated impacts from the proposed project. Any impacts to Wolf Valley Creek Channel, will likely required a CWA Section 404 permit from the Corps, CWA Section 401 Water Quality Certification from the Regional Board, and a Section 1602 Streambed Alteration Agreement from CDFW. Sensitive Biological Resources The CNDDB and CNPS was queried for reported locations of sensitive plant and wildlife species as well as sensitive natural plant communities within 2 miles of the project site within the Pechanga and Temecula USGS 7.5 -minute quadrangles. Only a 2 mile buffer around the project site was queried due to the project site's isolation from undisturbed native habitat and development surrounding the project site. A search of published records of these species was conducted within 2 miles of the project site using the CDFW CNDDB Rarefind 5 online software and CNPS Electronic Inventory. This report evaluated the conditions of the habitat(s) within the boundaries of the project site to determine if the existing plant communities have the potential to provide suitable habitat(s) for special -status plant and wildlife species. The literature search identified nine (9) special -status plant species, fourteen (14) special -status wildlife species, and one (1) special -status natural plant community as being documented within 2 miles of the Pechanga Parkway Widening Project Habitat Assessment and MSHCP Consistency Analysis Michael Baker INTERNATIONAL December 2, 2016 Page 7 of 10 project site. These special -status plant and wildlife species were evaluated for their potential to occur on the project site based on habitat requirements, availability/quality of suitable habitat, and known distributions. Special -status species that have been documented within 2 miles of the project site are presented in Attachment D, Potentially Occurring Status Species Biological Resources. Based on habitat requirements for specific species and the availability and quality of on-site habitats, it was determined that the project site does not provide suitable habitat that would support any of the CNDDB, CNPS or MSHCP listed plant or wildlife species that have been documented within 2 miles of the project site. The proposed widening alignment will be installed within the existing paved roads and landscaped areas. Further, the area surrounding the proposed project site is developed, which has removed natural plant communities that once occurred in the general area. Critical Habitat Under the federal Endangered Species Act, "Critical Habitat" is designated at the time of listing of a species or within one year of listing. Critical Habitat refers to habitat or a specific geographic area that contains the elements and features that are essential for the survival and recovery of the species. Maintenance of these physical and biological features requires special management considerations or protection, regardless of whether individuals or the species are present or not. In the event that a project may result in take or adverse modification to a species' designated Critical Habitat, a project proponent may be required to engage in suitable mitigation. However, consultation for impacts to Critical Habitat is only required when a project has a federal nexus (i.e. occurs on federal land, is issued federal permits [e.g. Corps Section 404 permit, or Corps Section 408 permit], or receives any other federal oversight or funding). If a project does not have a federal nexus, Critical Habitat consultations are not required. The USFWS Critical Habitat mapper was used to locate the closest federally designated Critical Habitat to the project site. The USFWS Critical Habitat mapper shows that the project site is not located within federally designated Critical Habitat. The closest designated Critical Habitat is located approximately 2 miles east of the project site for coastal California gnatcatcher (Polioptila californica californica). Western Riverside County MSHCP The project site is located in the Southwest Area Plan if the MSHCP, but is not located within any criteria cells, conservations areas, cores, or linkages identified within the MSHCP. Riparian/Riverine Areas Under MSHCP Section 6.1.2, riparian/riverine areas are defined as areas dominated by trees, shrubs, persistent emergent plants, or emergent mosses and lichens which occur close to or are dependent upon nearby freshwater, or areas with freshwater flowing during all or a portion of the year. Conservation of these areas is intended to protect habitat that is essential to a number of listed, water -dependent amphibians, birds, fish, invertebrates, and plants. If all impacts to riparian/riverine habitat cannot be avoided, a mitigation strategy called a Determination of Biologically Equivalent or Superior Preservation (DBESP) must be developed that addresses the replacement of lost functions of habitats in regards to the listed species. This assessment is independent from considerations given to "waters of the U.S." and "waters of the State" under the CWA and the California Fish and Game Code. Pechanga Parkway Widening Project Habitat Assessment and MSHCP Consistency Analysis Michael Baker INTERNATIONAL December 2, 2016 Page 8 of 10 No jurisdictional riparian/riverine areas are located within the proposed project footprint. It should be noted that Wolf Valley Creek Channel is located immediately north of the proposed project footprint. Wolf Valley Creek Channel is artificially maintained, and is planted with ornamental grass. Although artificially created, Wolf Valley Creek Channel will likely be considered riparian/riverine habitat under the MSHCP. Pursuant to Section 6.1.2 of the MSHCP, any alteration or loss of riparian/riverine habitat that may occur as a result of the proposed project will require the preparation of a Determination of Biologically Equivalent or Superior Preservation (DBESP) to ensure the replacement of any lost functions and values associated with Wolf Valley Creek Channel. Based on current design plans, no impacts to Wolf Valley Creek Channel are expected to occur from development of the proposed project. Vernal Pools The MSHCP lists two general classes of soils known to be associated with special -status plant species; clay soils and Traver -Domino Willow association soils. The specific clay soils known to be associated with special -status species within the MSHCP plan area include Bosanko, Auld, Altamont, and Porterville series soils, whereas Traver -Domino Willows association includes saline -alkali soils largely located along floodplain areas of the San Jacinto River and Salt Creek. Without the appropriate soils to create the impermeable restrictive layer, none of the special -status species associated with vernal pools can occur on the project site. None of these soils occur on the project site. Since the proposed widening alignment will be installed within the existing paved roads and landscaped areas, no undisturbed soils will be impacted. No impacts to vernal pools or fairy shrimp habitat will occur from implementation of the proposed project. Narrow Endemic Plant Species Based on the RCIP query and review of the MSHCP, it was determined that the proposed project is not located within the designated survey area for Narrow Endemic Plant Species as depicted in Figure 6-1 within Section 6.1.3 of the MSHCP. The proposed widening alignment will be installed within existing paved roads and landscaped areas that do not provide suitable habitat for Narrow Endemic Plant Species. Urban/Wildlands Interface Guidelines According to the MSHCP, the Urban/Wildlands Interface Guidelines are intended to address indirect effects associated with new development in proximity to MSHCP Conservation Areas (MSHCP, p 6-42). The proposed project is not located in or immediately adjacent to any Criteria Cells or MSHCP Conservation Areas; therefore, indirect project -related impacts to drainage, toxics, lighting, noise, invasive plant species, barriers, and grading/land development will not occur. Additional Survey Needs and Procedures The RCIP Conservation Summary Report Generator was queried to determine if the MSHCP lists any survey requirements for the project. The summary report identified that the project site is located in the designated survey area for burrowing owl as depicted in Figure 6-4 within Sections 6.3.2 of the MSHCP. Since the proposed widening alignment will be installed within the existing paved road and landscaped areas, burrowing owl are presumed absent and no impacts to burrowing owl will occur. Despite a systematic search of potentially suitable burrows and open habitat throughout the project site, no burrowing owl or sign (pellets, feathers, castings, or white wash) was observed during the habitat Pechanga Parkway Widening Project Habitat Assessment and MSHCP Consistency Analysis Michael Baker INTERNATIONAL December 2, 2016 Page 9 of 10 assessment. The heavy disturbances associated with the disking activities have likely precluded burrowing owls from inhabiting the project site. Due to the lack of burrowing owl sign and suitable burrows, burrowing owl are presumed not to occupy the project site and have a low potential to occur on site. A burrowing owl pre -construction clearance survey is recommended to be conducted within seven (7) days prior to ground disturbance, in accordance with the MSHCP, to ensure burrowing owl remain absent from the project site. Conclusion No sensitive plant or wildlife species were observed on the project site during the habitat assessment. It was found that naturally occurring native plant communities are not present on-site and the proposed project site has limited potential or support sensitive plant and wildlife species known to occur in the general area. Surrounding development has isolated the project site from connecting to undisturbed, natural habitats still available in the area. The isolation and disturbance level of the project site limits the site's viability to provide suitable habitat for sensitive biological resources (i.e. sensitive plant and wildlife species, drainage features). As a result, the site does not provide suitable habitat for any of the identified sensitive plant or wildlife species known to occur in the general area, and no significant adverse impacts to biological resources are identified or anticipated, during the implementation of the proposed project. Therefore, we have determined that this project will not have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modification on any special -status species known to occur in the general vicinity of the project site. Recommendations Migratory Bird Treaty Act Pursuant to the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and Fish and Game Code, removal of any trees, shrubs, or any other potential nesting habitat should be conducted outside the avian nesting season. The nesting season generally extends from early February through August, but can vary slightly from year to year based upon seasonal weather conditions. If ground disturbance and vegetation removal cannot occur outside of the nesting season, a pre -construction clearance survey for nesting birds should be conducted within seven (7) days of the start of any ground disturbing activities to ensure that no nesting birds will be disturbed during construction. The biologist conducting the clearance survey should document a negative survey with a brief letter report indicating that no impacts to active avian nests will occur. If an active avian nest is discovered during the pre -construction clearance survey, construction activities should stay outside of a 300 -foot buffer around the active nest. For raptor species, this buffer is expanded to 500 feet. It is recommended that a biological monitor be present to delineate the boundaries of the buffer area and to monitor the active nest to ensure that nesting behavior is not adversely affected by the construction activity. Once the young have fledged and left the nest, or the nest otherwise becomes inactive under natural conditions, normal construction activities can occur. Please do not hesitate to contact Thomas J. McGill at (909) 974-4907 or tmcgill(ambakerintl.com or Travis J. McGill at (909) 974-4958 or travismcgill(a,mbakerintl.com should you have any questions or require further information. Pechanga Parkway Widening Project Habitat Assessment and MSHCP Consistency Analysis Michael Baker INTERNATIONAL December 2, 2016 Page l0 of 10 Sincerely, Thomas J. McGill, Ph.D. Travis J. McGill Vice President Biologist Natural Resources Natural Resources Attachments: A. Project Exhibits B. Riverside County Integrated Project Conservation Summary Report C. Site Photographs D. Potentially Occurring Special -Status Biological Resources Pechanga Parkway Widening Project Habitat Assessment and MSHCP Consistency Analysis Michael Baker INTERNATIONAL Attachment A Project Exhibits 10/10/2016 JN M. 1Mdata1153547\GIS\MXD\Ex 1 Regio Perris. _ake Elsinore land ge ,SedcoHills Wildomat" Murrieta" MAVAL WEAPON STATIONSEAL HEA'. CCETACNMENTCAtLP- Fallbrook. tt' Nuevo GA Sun City r . i Mu rrieta Hot Springs Temecula' AYi! AN 4!J!iN;A!N Legend 0 Project Site 1\1 gri Project Site PAUMA nil MA 'ALA Content may not reflect National Geographic's current; map policy. Sources: National Geographic, Esri, DeLorme, HERE, UNEP-WCMC, USGS,,NASA, ESA, METI, NRCAN, GEBCO, NOAA, increment P Corp. Michael Baker INTERNATIONAL O 0 2 4 Miles PECHANGA PARKWAY WIDENING PROJECT Sour,- Regional Vicinity Map Exhibit 1 CC J: LL O LIMITS OF ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS Michael Baker INTERNATIONAL JN153547 PECHANGA PARKWAY WIDENING PROJECT Local Vicinity Map Figure 2 Michael Baker INTERNATIONAL jrtuasm 8 g � 6o d EXISTING STORM DR4INI d CHANNEL --- / (-DAYLIGHT Ex. 30,E —PROP Rill 8 A WOLF CREEK DEVELOPMENT TR. 29306 e 8 8 8 re S L-120' 0-io. z R. i 993J- PECHANGA PARKWAY TR. 19939-2 0 20 0 40 5 120 0 0 IA 0) , F W (� _ uiI Z W J W F 2 PECHANGA PARKWAY WIDENING PROJECT Site Plan Figure 3a STORM 7---EXISTING DRAIN CHANNEL DAYLIGHT-) -47- 7-EX. SLOPE --X R/ CAMEO* NIGH PRESSURE GAS LITE. COIIRACIM TO WTIFY NOTI20R4L /A1EIRICAL PRIOR 10 COGT ILCTIGH 8 8 e g nl WOLF VALLEY RD. (SEE SEET 6 FOR CENTERLINE PROFILE) cl 194• 47 .12' ; .35 J5' 12 8 8 8 5 W 6' e WOLF CREEK DEVELOPMENT TR. 29305 (n15 4 ...� SSS :S2 ooh o8g 3d4 /1 7 EX. SLOPE ` <s� 0 o etc 4 • EX. SLOE DAYLILM F}� i4 --OK. yR--:_—_ n 9LTE1fiANi _ PEBGlBAIIDIAN RESOTVATIO4 8 Michael Baker INTERNATIONAL JN 15351E id L•120' 6N' TR. 19939-2 q �IA EDUARD .2X t�� •go lis PECHANGA PARKWAY PECHANGA CASINO 2 . R/4- 9. • 8 a d R-te• 40 20 0 40 m 120 PECHANGA PARKWAY WIDENING PROJECT IS/MND Site Plan Figure 3b Michael Michael Baker INTERNATIONAL jN,53a7 0 0 0 QLIZ w En= wO) z J w I rn U 1— ,-0411_0341" L=50' F12.56 8 9d a WOLF CREEK DEVELOPMENT TR. 29305 EXIST NC 17; / DRAIN CHANNEL Sbi SEX S E L=120' POD 8b P CHAI\GA CASINO N. TtTI i ce a PECHANGA CASINO CSIru f w PECHANGA PARKWAY 0 0 1— LD Vw wcn Z J w 0 2 40 20 0 40 20 PECHANGA PARKWAY WIDENING PROJECT IS/MND Site Plan Figure 3c Michael Baker INTERNATIONAL JN 15354] WOLF cPr5,K DEV LOPMEAT TR, 29306 /Df2Aii�1 114 447'44'53'W CHANNEL 115 ---- Dom/ REsxvAifa � --r PCCHANCRA CASINO PECHANGA PARKWAY 1' 4IN. i(TYP) 40 20 0 40 120 PECHANGA PARKWAY WIDENING PROJECT IS/MND Site Plan Figure 3d Attachment B Riverside County Integrated Project Conservation Summary Report 12/5/2016 Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) ,,F,Riverside County Transporation and Land Management Agency - TLMA Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) APN CeII CeII Group Acres ( Area Plan Sub Unit 921020028 Not A Valid Parcel Number 961020027 Not A Part Independent 8.5 Southwest Area Not a Part 962010037 Not A Part Independent 10.19 Southwest Area Not a Part HABITAT ASSESSMENTS Habitat assessment shall be required and should address at a minimum potential habitat for the following species: APN Amphibia Burrowing Criteria Area Mammalian Narrow Endemic Special Linkage Species Owl Species Species Plant Species Area 961020027 NO YES NO NO NO NO 962010037 NO YES NO NO NO NO Burrowing Owl Burrowing owl. If potential habitat for these species is determined to be located on the property, focused surveys may be required during the appropriate season. Background The final MSHCP was approved by the County Board of Supervisors on June 17, 2003. The federal and state permits were issued on June 22, 2004 and implementation of the MSHCP began on June 23, 2004. For more information concerning the MSHCP, contact your local city or the County of Riverside for the unincorporated areas. Additionally, the Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority (RCA), which oversees all the cities and County implementation of the MSHCP, can be reached at: Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority 3403 loth Street, Suite 320 Riverside, CA 92501 Phone: 951-955-9700 Fax: 951-955-8873 http://www5.rctlma.org/cgi-bin/TED060209rciprepgenNEW.pI 1/2 12/5/2016 Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) www.wrc-rca.org Go Back To Previous Page GIS Home Page TLMA Horne Page http://www5.rctlma.org/cgi-bin/TED060209rciprepgenNEW.pI 2/2 Attachment C Site Photographs Attachment C — Site Photographs Photograph 1: Looking northwest along the north side of Pechanga Parkway from N. Casino Drive. Photograph 2: Looking northwest at the landscaped slope of Wolf Valley Creek Channel, north of the project site. Pechanga Parkway Widening Project Habitat Assessment and MSHCP Consistency Analysis Michael Baker INTERNATIONAL Attachment C — Site Photographs Photograph 3: Looking at the cattail and bulrush in the active channel of Wolf Valley Creek Channel. Photograph 4: Looking at the landscaped area between Pechanga Parkway and Wolf Valley Creek Channel. Pechanga Parkway Widening Project Habitat Assessment and MSHCP Consistency Analysis Michael Baker INTERNATIONAL Attachment D Potentially Occurring Sensitive Biological Resources Scientific Name Special -Status Wildlife Aspidoscelis hyperythra Athene cunicularia Bombus crotchii Buteo swainsoni Crotalus ruber Dipodomys stephensi Emys marmorata Eumops perotis californicus Gila orcuttii Perognathus longimembris brevinasus Phrynosoma blainvillii Polioptila californica californica Spea hammondii Streptocephalus woottoni Special -Status Plants Abronia villosa var. aurita Arctostaphylos rainbowensis Astragalus pachypus var. jaegeri Berberis nevinii Brodiaea orcuttii Dodecahema leptoceras Horkelia cuneata var. puberula Lasthenia glabrata ssp. coulteri Pseudognaphalium leucocephalum Special -Status Plant Communities Southern Willow Scrub Common Name orangethroat whiptail burrowing owl Crotch bumble bee Swainson's hawk red -diamond rattlesnake Stephens' kangaroo rat western pond turtle western mastiff bat arroyo chub Los Angeles pocket mouse coast horned lizard coastal California gnatcatcher western spadefoot Riverside fairy shrimp chaparral sand -verbena Rainbow manzanita Jaeger's milk -vetch Nevin's barberry Orcutt's brodiaea slender -horned spineflower mesa horkelia Coulter's goldfields white rabbit -tobacco Pechanga Creek Widening Project Habitat Assessment and A SHCP Consistency, Analysis Attachment D Potentially Occurring Special -Status Biological Resources Federal Status State Status CNPS Rare Plant Rank Potential to Occur None WL None CSC None None None Threatened None CSC Endangered Threatened None CSC None CSC None CSC None CSC None CSC Threatened CSC None CSC Endangered None None None 1 B.1 None None 1 B.1 None None 1B.1 Endangered Endangered 1B. 1 None None IB.1 Endangered Endangered 1B.1 None None 1 B.1 None None I B.1 None None 2B.2 None Presumed Absent Presumed Absent Presumed Absent Presumed Absent Presumed Absent Presumed Absent Presumed Absent Presumed Absent Presumed Absent Presumed Absent Presumed Absent Presumed Absent Presumed Absent Presumed Absent Presumed Absent Presumed Absent Presumed Absent Presumed Absent Presumed Absent Presumed Absent Presumed Absent Presumed Absent Presumed Absent None Absent City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening Appendix C: Cultural Resources Assessment December 2016 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT Pechanga Parkway Widening Project Temecula, Riverside County, California Prepared for: Darren Edgington Michael Baker International 40810 County Center Drive, Suite 100 Temecula, California 92591-6022 Prepared by: David Brunzell, M.A., RPA BCR Consulting LLC 1420 Guadalajara Place Claremont, California 91711 Project No. RBF1611 Data Base (NADB) Information: Type of Study: Reconnaissance Survey Resources Recorded: None USGS Quadrangles: 7.5 -minute Pechanga (1975) and Temecula (1997) California BCRCONSULTING LLC October 19, 2016 OCTOBER 19, 2016 BCR CONSULTING LLC CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT PECHANGA PARKWAY WIDENING PROJECT MANAGEMENT SUMMARY BCR Consulting LLC (BCR Consulting) is under contract to Michael Baker International to complete a Cultural Resources Assessment of the Pechanga Parkway Widening Project (the project) located in Temecula, Riverside County, California. A cultural resources records search, reconnaissance level pedestrian field survey, Tribal Scoping, and paleontological map review were conducted for the project in partial fulfillment of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The records search revealed that 27 cultural resource studies have taken place resulting in the recording of 26 cultural resources within one mile of the project site. Of the 27 previous studies, four have assessed the project site resulting in no cultural resources recorded within its boundaries. Four cultural resources (including three prehistoric isolates and one prehistoric site with a historic component) have been recorded adjacent to its boundaries. During the field survey, BCR Consulting did not discover any cultural resources, including prehistoric or historic -period archaeological sites or historic -period buildings, within the project boundaries. However, since numerous cultural resources have been recorded in the vicinity (and four are adjacent) the project site is considered sensitive for buried cultural resources. Based on these results, BCR Consulting recommends that a professional archaeological monitor be present to monitor any ground -disturbing activities associated with the proposed project. The monitor shall work under the direct supervision of a Cultural Resource Professional that meets the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualification Standards for Archaeology (the qualified archaeologist). The monitor shall be authorized to temporarily stop and divert construction equipment to investigate any areas suspected to contain cultural resources. Excavation will cease in the area surrounding any cultural resource discoveries until the qualified archaeologist can evaluate the discovery for California Register of Historical Resources eligibility. Evaluations shall take place in consultation with the City and any participating Native American entities. Non -eligible resources would not merit further consideration. Eligible discoveries would be mitigated by avoidance or data recovery. If human remains are encountered during any proposed project activities, State Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 states that no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. The County Coroner must be notified of the find immediately. If the remains are determined prehistoric, the Coroner will notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), which will determine and notify a Most Likely Descendant (MLD). With the permission of the landowner or his/her authorized representative, the MLD may inspect the site of the discovery. The MLD shall complete the inspection within 48 hours of notification by the NAHC. ii OCTOBER 19, 2016 BCR CONSULTING LLC CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT PECHANGA PARKWAY WIDENING PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS MANAGEMENT SUMMARY INTRODUCTION 1 NATURAL SETTING 1 CULTURAL SETTING 1 PREHISTORIC CONTEXT 1 ETHNOGRAPHY 3 HISTORY 4 PERSONNEL 4 METHODS 4 RESEARCH 4 FIELD SURVEY 5 RESULTS 5 RESEARCH 5 FIELD SURVEY 6 RECOMMENDATIONS 6 CERTIFICATION 6 REFERENCES 7 FIGURES 1: Project Location and Vicinity Maps 2 TABLES A: Cultural Resource Records Search Results 5 APPENDICES A: TRIBAL SCOPING B: PROJECT PHOTOGRAPHS C: PALEONTOLOGICAL SENSITIVITY MAP OCTOBER 19, 2016 BCR CONSULTING LLC CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT PECHANGA PARKWAY WIDENING PROJECT INTRODUCTION BCR Consulting LLC (BCR Consulting) is under contract to Michael Baker International to complete a Cultural Resources Assessment of the Pechanga Parkway Widening Project (the project) located in Temecula, Riverside County, California. A cultural resources records search, reconnaissance level pedestrian field survey, Tribal Scoping, and paleontological map review were conducted for the project site in partial fulfillment of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The project site is located within a non -sectioned portion of Township 8 South, Range 2 West, San Bernardino Baseline and Meridian. It is depicted on the United States Geological Survey (USGS) Pechanga (1997) and Temecula (1975), California 7.5 -minute topographic quadrangles (Figure 1). NATURAL SETTING The elevation of the project site ranges from approximately 960 to 1170 feet above mean sea level (AMSL). It exhibits a northwesterly aspect and occupies a portion of the Temecula Creek and Pechanga Creek watersheds. Artificial disturbances associated with the existing road and adjacent municipal, commercial, and residential installations are severe (see USGS 1975). Coastal sage scrub, oak woodland, and riparian habitat vegetation communities are typical of the area. For details on local prehistoric (particularly Luiseno) use of plant and animal species, see Bean and Shipek (1978:552) and Oxendine (1983:19-29). Sparkman (1908) and Bean and Saubel (1972) can be referenced to review prehistoric harvesting and processing methods, and seasons and conditions in which edible plants grow locally. The project site is located in the Peninsular Range geologic province of California that encompasses western Riverside County. It occupies the eastern margin of the Perris Block (Kenney 1999), which is bounded on the east by the San Jacinto Fault (Reynolds 1988, Morton 1972, 1977). Crystalline rocks present in the region include late Jurassic and cretaceous granitics of the southern California batholith. These resistant rocks weather to form gray or tan colored, boulder -covered conical buttes and hills. Locally, a thin veneer of Holocene soils typically obscures late Pleistocene sediments that often erode away to reveal the base of local boulder outcrops (Rogers 1965). During prehistory in Western Riverside County the boulders that form such outcrops were widely utilized as milling slicks for seed processing, although no boulders of this type were observed in the project site area. Decomposing granite in the form of brown silty sand dominates sediments observed within the project site. CULTURAL SETTING Prehistoric Context The local prehistoric cultural setting has been organized into many chronological frameworks (see Warren and Crabtree 1986; Bettinger and Taylor 1974; Lanning 1963; Hunt 1960; Wallace 1958, 1962, 1977; Wallace and Taylor 1978; Campbell and Campbell 1935), although there is no definitive sequence for the region. The difficulties in establishing cultural chronologies for Riverside County are a function of its enormous size and the small amount of archaeological excavations conducted there. Moreover, throughout prehistory many groups have occupied the area and their territories often overlap spatially and 1 17, awl caster ` / ` r')"tCie01 SafGabriel .0.4. cats -I k 4�ade? INSantaY Project I �0i •Ri a•..ide ` onGAx L�o•�ng Beac 9J c t', 0� 4icwpo- :each ii,dio SanN Juantstano P, 'n�, y sant,. R1t un �� Catalina Oceanside• • Escondido Imperial ns\ C't1 V „tB.:twlyny CI elCefaro. cave:,_ „otYu • Is 0 Avsnue Palsano 0 50 100 Emm=amomMiies sr� ! 'aV"114`a 1N1: i&fteMil W.{ti' 'BCRCONSULTING LLC \. ^.Wwmp Mqn nems, e 7075 _ii rt f1 tv"�: Ips 0 0.25 0.5 1 Kilometers 0 025 05 Project Location Pechanga Parkway Widening Project Reference ESRI USGS Quad Temecula 1975 and Pecha •a 1997 Cerebrum Figure 1 1 Miles#}1_\'!".:+4'+1:1wff Michael Baker International 40810 County Center Drive. Suite 100 Temecula, California 92591 OCTOBER 19, 2016 BCR CONSULTING LLC CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT PECHAGA PARKWAY WIDENING PROJECT chronologically resulting in mixed artifact deposits. Due to dry climate and capricious geological processes, these artifacts rarely become integrated in-situ. Lacking a milieu hospitable to the preservation of cultural midden, local chronologies have relied upon temporally diagnostic artifacts, such as projectile points, or upon the presence/absence of other temporal indicators, such as groundstone. Such methods are instructive, but can be limited by prehistoric occupants' concurrent use of different artifact styles, or by artifact re- use or re -sharpening, as well as researchers' mistaken diagnosis, and other factors (see Flenniken 1985; Flenniken and Raymond 1986; Flenniken and Wilke 1989). Recognizing the shortcomings of comparative temporal indicators, this study recommends review of Warren and Crabtree (1986), who have drawn upon this method to produce a commonly cited and relatively comprehensive chronology. Ethnography The APE is situated within the traditional boundaries of the Luiserio (Bean and Shipek 1978; Kroeber 1925). Typically, the native culture groups in southern California are named after nearby Spanish missions, and such is the case for this Takic-speaking population. For instance, the term "Luiseno" is applied to the natives inhabiting the region within the "ecclesiastical jurisdiction of Mission San Luis Rey...[and who shared] an ancestral relationship which is evident in their cosmogony, and oral tradition, common language, and reciprocal relationship in ceremonies" (Oxendine 1983:8). The first written accounts of the Luiseno are attributed to the mission fathers. Sparkman (1908), Oxendine (1983) and others produced later documentation. Prior to Spanish occupation of California, the territory of the Luiseno extended along the coast from Agua Hedionda Creek to the south, Aliso Creek to the northwest, and the Elsinore Valley and Palomar Mountain to the east. These territorial boundaries were somewhat fluid and changed through time. They encompassed diverse environments that included coastal beaches, lagoons and marshes, inland river valleys and foothills, and mountain groves of oaks and evergreens (Bean and Shipek 1978:551). Like other Native American groups in southern California, the Luiseno caught and collected seasonally available food resources, and led a semi -sedentary lifestyle. Luiseno villages generally were located in valley bottoms, along streams, or along coastal strands near mountain ranges sheltered in canyons, near a water source, and in a location that was easily defended. Individuals from these villages took advantage of the varied resources available. They also established seasonal camps along the coast and near bays and estuaries to gather shellfish and hunt waterfowl (Kroeber 1925, Bean and Shipek 1978). The Luiseno lived in small communities, which were the focus of family life. Luiserio villages were politically independent, administered by a hereditary chief, and occupied by patrilineally linked extended families (Kroeber 1925; Bean and Shipek 1978). The Luiseno believed in private property, which covered items and land owned by the village, as well as items (houses, gardens, ritual equipment, trade beads, eagle nests, and songs) owned by individuals. Trespass against any property was punished (Bean and Shipek 1978:551). Luiseno subsistence was based primarily on seeds like acorns, grass seed, Manzanita, sunflower, sage, chia, and pine nuts. Seeds were dried and ground to be cooked into a mush. Game animals such as deer, rabbit, jackrabbit, wood rat, mice, antelope, and many types of birds supplemented their vegetal intake (Lightfoot and Parrish 2009:341-362). The Luiseno utilized fire for crop management and communal rabbit drives (ibid.; Bean and Shipek 1978:552). 3 OCTOBER 19, 2016 BCR CONSULTING LLC CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT PECHAGA PARKWAY WIDENING PROJECT History Historic -era California is generally divided into three periods: the Spanish or Mission Period (1769 to 1821), the Mexican or Rancho Period (1821 to 1848), and the American Period (1848 to present). Spanish Period. The first European to pass through the vicinity is thought to be a Spaniard called Father Francisco Garces. Having become familiar with the area, Garces acted as a guide to Juan Bautista de Anza, who had been commissioned to lead a group across the desert from a Spanish outpost in Arizona to set up quarters at the Mission San Gabriel in 1771 near what today is Pasadena (Beck and Haase 1974). Garces was followed by Alta California Governor Pedro Fages, who briefly explored the region in 1772. Searching for San Diego Presidio deserters, Fages had traveled through Riverside to San Bernardino, crossed over the mountains into the Mojave Desert, and then journeyed westward to the San Joaquin Valley (Beck and Haase 1974). Mexican Period. In 1821, Mexico overthrew Spanish rule and the missions began to decline. By 1833, the Mexican government passed the Secularization Act, and the missions, reorganized as parish churches, lost their vast land holdings, and released their neophytes (Beattie and Beattie 1974). American Period. The American Period, 1848—Present, began with the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo. In 1850, California was accepted into the Union of the United States primarily due to the population increase created by the Gold Rush of 1849. The cattle industry reached its greatest prosperity during the first years of the American Period. Mexican Period land grants had created large pastoral estates in California, and demand for beef during the Gold Rush led to a cattle boom that lasted from 1849-1855. However, beginning about 1855, the demand for beef began to decline due to imports of sheep from New Mexico and cattle from the Mississippi and Missouri Valleys. When the beef market collapsed, many California ranchers lost their ranchos through foreclosure. A series of disastrous floods in 1861-1862, followed by a significant drought diminished the economic impact of local ranching. This decline combined with ubiquitous agricultural and real estate developments of the late 19th century, set the stage for diversified economic pursuits that have continued to proliferate to this day (Beattie and Beattie 1974; Cleland 1941). PERSONNEL David Brunzell, M.A., RPA acted as the Project Manager and Principal Investigator for the current study. Mr. Brunzell also compiled the technical report and initiated the Tribal Scoping. BCR Consulting Staff Archaeologist Judy Bernal, B.A., completed the cultural resources records search and performed the field survey. METHODS Research Prior to fieldwork, a records search was conducted at the Eastern Information Center (EIC), the local clearinghouse for cultural resource records. This archival research reviewed the status of all recorded historic and prehistoric cultural resources, and survey and excavation 4 OCTOBER 19, 2016 BCR CONSULTING LLC CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT PECHAGA PARKWAY WIDENING PROJECT reports completed within one mile of the project site. Additional resources reviewed included the National Register of Historic Places, the California Register of Historical Resources, and documents and inventories published by the California Office of Historic Preservation. These include the lists of California Historical Landmarks, California Points of Historical Interest, Listing of National Register Properties, and Inventory of Historic Structures. Field Survey An archaeological field survey of the project site was conducted on August 22, 2016. The survey was conducted by walking parallel transects along 100 percent of the alignment frontage. Soil exposures were carefully inspected for evidence of cultural resources. RESULTS Research Research completed through the EIC revealed that 27 cultural resource studies have taken place resulting in the recording of 26 cultural resources within one mile of the project site. Of the 27 previous studies, four have assessed the project site resulting in no cultural resources recorded within its boundaries. Four cultural resources (including three prehistoric isolates and one prehistoric site with a historic component) have been recorded adjacent to its boundaries. A summary of the records search is included below. Table A. Cultural Resource Records Search Results USGS 7.5 Minute Quadrangles Resources Within One Mile of Project Site (Location) Studies Within One Mile of Project Site Pechanga (1975) and Temecula P-33-1460: Prehistoric Site (1/2 Mile SW) P-33-2536: Prehistoric/Historic-Period Site (1/2 Mile SW) RI -111, 213, 513, 545*, 1048, 1604, 1857*, (1997), California P -33-4707/H: Prehistoric/Historic-Period Site (Adjacent N) 2070, 2261, 2343, 3189, P-33-7848: Historic -Period Site (1/8 Mile SW) 3436, 3437, 3440, 3589, P-33-7849: Historic -Period Site (1/4 Mile S) 3440, 4147, 4346, 4356, P-33-7859: Historic -Period Site (1/4 Mile S) 4654, 5145, 5431, 5539, P-33-7860: Prehistoric Site (1/4 Mile SW) 5880, 6790`, 7096*, P-33-7861: Prehistoric Site (1/4 Mile SW) 8408 P-33-7862: Prehistoric Site (1/2 Mile S) P-33-7863: Historic -Period Site (3/4 Mile S) P-33-7864: Prehistoric Site (1/2 Mile S) P-33-7865: Prehistoric Site (1/2 Mile S) P-33-7906: Prehistoric/Historic-Period Site (3/4 Mile SW) P-33-7907: Prehistoric Site (1/2 Mile SW) P-33-7909: Prehistoric/Historic-Period Site (1 Mile SW) P-33-11005: Prehistoric Site (1/2 Mile NW) P-33-11069: Prehistoric Site (1/2 Mile SW) P-33-11070: Prehistoric Site (1/2 Mile SW) P-33-18091: Historic -Period Site (1/2 Mile SW) P-33-22168: Historic -Period Site (3/4 Mile SW) P-33-22170: Prehistoric/Historic-Period Site (1/2 Mile SW) P-33-22171: Historic -Period Site (3/4 Mile SW) P-33-24088: Prehistoric Isolate (1/4 Mile NE) P-33-24089: Prehistoric Isolate (Adjacent N) P-33-24090: Prehistoric Isolate (Adjacent N) P-33-24091: Prehistoric (Adjacent N) revlously assessed a portion of the project site. 5 OCTOBER 19, 2016 BCR CONSULTING LLC CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT PECHAGA PARKWAY WIDENING PROJECT Field Survey During the field survey, BCR Consulting archaeologists did not record any cultural resources within the project site boundaries. The project site exhibited approximately 10 percent surface visibility. Artificial disturbances associated with the existing road and adjacent municipal, commercial, and residential installations were severe. The non -built portions of the project site exhibit sparse native and non-native grasses and scrub brush, particularly along the alignment's northern frontage near the northwestern terminus, and at a vacant lot located at the northwestern intersection of Pechanga Parkway and Loma Linda Road. RECOMMENDATIONS The records search and field survey did not identify any cultural resources, including prehistoric or historic -period archaeological sites or historic -period buildings, currently located within the project boundaries. However, since numerous cultural resources have been recorded in the vicinity (four adjacent) the project site is considered sensitive for buried cultural resources. Based on these results, BCR Consulting recommends that a professional archaeological monitor be present to monitor any ground -disturbing activities associated with the proposed project. The monitor shall work under the direct supervision of a Cultural Resource Professional that meets the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualification Standards for Archaeology (the qualified archaeologist). The monitor shall be authorized to divert construction equipment to investigate any areas suspected to contain cultural resources. Excavation will cease in the area surrounding any cultural resource discoveries until the qualified archaeologist can evaluate the discovery for California Register of Historical Resources eligibility. Evaluations shall take place in consultation with the City and any participating Native American entities. Non -eligible resources would not merit further consideration. Eligible discoveries would be mitigated by avoidance or data recovery. If human remains are encountered during any proposed project activities, State Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 states that no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner determines origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. The County Coroner must be notified of the find immediately. If the remains are determined to be prehistoric, the Coroner will notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), which will determine and notify a Most Likely Descendant (MLD). With the permission of the landowner or representative, the MLD may inspect the discovery site. The MLD shall complete inspection within 48 hours of notification by the NAHC. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this archaeological report, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Date: October 19, 2016 David Brunzell Authorized Signature Printed Name 6 OCTOBER 19, 2016 BCR CONSULTING LLC CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT PECHAGA PARKWAY WIDENING PROJECT REFERENCES Beattie, George W., and Helen P. Beattie 1974 Heritage of the Valley: San Bernardino's First Century. Biobooks: Oakland. Bean, Lowell John, and Florence Shipek 1978 California, edited by R.F. Heizer. Handbook of North American Indians, Vol. 8, W.C. Sturtevant, general editor, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. Bean, Lowell John and Katherine Siva Saubel 1972 Temalpakh. Malki Museum Press. Banning, California. Beck, Warren A., and Ynez D. Haase 1974 Historical Atlas of California. Oklahoma City: University of Oklahoma Press. Bettinger, Robert L., and R.E. Taylor 1974 Suggested Revisions in Archaeological Sequences of the Great Basin and Interior Southern California. Nevada Archaeological Survey Research Papers 3:1-26. Campbell, E., and W. Campbell 1935 The Pinto Basin. Southwest Museum Papers 9:1-51. Cleland, Robert Glass 1941 The Cattle on a Thousand Hills—Southern California, 1850-80. San Marino, California: Huntington Library. Flenniken, J.J. 1985 Stone Tool Reduction Techniques as Cultural Markers. Stone Tool Analysis: Essays in Honor of Don E. Crabtree, edited by M.G. Plew, J.C. Woods, and M.G. Pavesic. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque. Flenniken, J.J. and A.W. Raymond 1986 Morphological Projectile Point Typology: Replication, Experimentation, and Technological Analysis. American Antiquity 51:603-614. Flenniken, J.J. and Philip J. Wilke 1989 Typology, Technology, and Chronology of Great Basin Dart Points. American Anthropologist 91:149-158. Hunt, Alice P. 1960 The Archaeology of the Death Valley Salt Pan, California. University of Utah Anthropological Papers No. 47. Kenney, M.D. 1999 Introduction to the Natural History of Southern California. California Natural History Guides: 13. Los Angeles: University of California Press. 7 OCTOBER 19, 2016 BCR CONSULTING LLC CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT PECHAGA PARKWAY WIDENING PROJECT Kroeber, Alfred L. 1925 Handbook of the Indians of California. Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin 78. Washington D.C.: Smithsonian Institution. Reprinted in 1976, New York: Dover Publications. Lanning, Edward P. 1963 The Archaeology of the Rose Spring Site (Iny-372). University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology 49(3):237-336. Lightfoot, Kent G., Otis Parrish 2009 California Indians and Their Environment, an Introduction. University of California Press, Berkeley. Morton, D.M. 1972 Geology of the Lakeview -Perris Quadrangle, Riverside County, California, CDMG, Map Sheet 19, Scale 1:24,000. 1977 Surface Deformation in Part of the San Jacitno Valley, Southern California, in Journal of Research, Vol. 5, No. 1, Jan -Feb. 1977, pp. 117-124. Oxendine, Joan 1983 The Luiseno Village During the Late Prehistoric Era. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of California, Riverside. Reynolds, R.E. 1988 Paleontologic Resource Overview and Management Plan for Edwards Air Force Base, California. San Bernardino County Museum, Redlands, California. Rogers, M.J. 1965 Early Lithic Industries of the Lower Basin of the Colorado River and Adjacent Desert Areas. San Diego Museum Papers No. 3. Sparkman, Philip S. 1908 The Culture of the Luiseno Indians. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology 8(4). University of California, Berkeley. United States Geological Survey 1975 Temecula, California 7.5 -minute topographic quadrangle map 1997 Pechanga, California 7.5 -minute topographic quadrangle map Wallace, William J. 1958 Archaeological Investigation in Death Valley National Monument. University of California Archaeological Survey Reports 42:7-22. 1962 Prehistoric Cultural Development in the Southern California Deserts. American Antiquity 28(2):172-180. 8 OCTOBER 19, 2016 BCR CONSULTING LLC CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT PECHAGA PARKWAY WIDENING PROJECT 1977 A Half Century of Death Valley Archaeology. The Journal of California Anthropology 4(2):249-258. Wallace, William J., and Edith S. Taylor 1978 Ancient Peoples and Cultures of Death Valley National Monument. Acoma Books, Ramona, California. Warren, Claude N., and R.H. Crabtree 1986 The Prehistory of the Southwestern Great Basin. In Handbook of the North American Indians, Vol. 11, Great Basin, edited by W.L. d'Azevedo, pp.183-193. W.C. Sturtevant, General Editor. Smithsonian Institution, Washington D.C. 9 OCTOBER 19, 2016 BCR CONSULTING LLC CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT PECHAGA PARKWAY WIDENING PROJECT APPENDIX A TRIBAL SCOPING Subject: BCR Consulting SLF/List of Tribes Request, Pechanga Pkwy Widening, Temecula, Riverside County From: David Brunzell (david.brunzell@yahoo.com) To: gayle.totton@nahc.ca.gov; Date: Monday, September 12, 2016 3:18 PM Hi Gayle, I'd like to request a Sacred Lands File Search and list of potentially interested tribes for the proposed Pechanga Parkway Widening Project in the City of Temecula, Riverside County, California. The lead agency for this project is the City of Temecula. The Project will be located as follows (SBBM; see attached project location map): Township 8 South Range 2 West Non -sectioned USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Quads: Temecula (1975) and Pechanga (1997), California Please send the results and list to my email and please get in touch with any questions. Thanks, David Brunzell Principal Investigator/Archaeologist BCR Consulting LLC Certified Small Business (SB) 1420 Guadalajara Place Claremont, California 91711 909-525-7078 www.bcrconsulting.net Attachments • Fig 1.pdf (554.69KB) Temec Project Location Mt PFc. it 41 • `` I Lancaster wtC�eh 4zz',,�ySanGtilabtsrul ocP 4a<c• • ,�� . e �. f Santat'i•4 dera tae Prr asp • NG�� Long Beae Sant, u•a Santa* Catalina temente VI tde } a��e�91 ` aim rings N, VAI•lcwpo- : each 16dw r N,r• Juan+ Be.'oma;"f� 11` Ip otrano id �i Oceanside. • Escondido Imperial na+ G0v1 „4rawiey Et cenxita _Yu • ICiimmo is /,. 0 50 100 Miles Kilometers Avenue Poise 0.25 0.5 o BCRCONSULTING LLC claw M.Y TMKrM1 www Oomwfi'+9.M OM 527 7071 rn •iLd1111•11111l .itA LFII Project Location Pechanga Parkway Widening Project Reference ESRI USGS Quad Temecula 1975 and Pechar .a (159 - Figure 159 - Figure 1 Michael Baker International 40810 County Center Drive. Suite 100 Temecula. California 92591 STATE Q S;ALIFORNIA Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Governor NATIVE AMERICAN HERITAGE COMMISSION 1650 Harbor Blvd., Suite 100 West Sacramento, CA 96691 (916) 373-3710 (916) 373-5471 FAX September 13, 2016 David Brunzell BCR Consulting Sent by E-mail: David.brunzell@yahoo.com RE: Proposed Pechanga Parkway Widening Project, City of Temecula; Temecula and Pechanga USGS Quadrangles, Riverside County, California Dear Mr. Brunzell: Attached is a consultation list of tribes with traditional lands or cultural places located within the boundaries of the above referenced counties. A record search of the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) Sacred Lands File (SLF) was completed for the area of potential project effect (APE) for the above referenced project. Sites have been recorded In the APE you provided that may be impacted by the project. Please contact the Pechanqa Band of Mission Indians at (951) 770-6000 or (951) 770-8100 for more information about the sites. Please contact ALL of the culturally affiliated Tribes on the attached Tribal Contact List directly for more information about other potential sites within your APE. Our records indicate that the lead agency for this project has not requested a Native American Contact List for the purposes of consultation. Please note that the intent of the referenced codes below is to mitigate impacts to tribal cultural resources, as defined, for California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) projects. As of July 1, 2015, Public Resources Code Sections 21080.3.1 and 21080.3.2 require public agencies to consult with California Native American tribes identified by the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) for the purpose mitigating impacts to tribal cultural resources: Within 14 days of determining that an application for a project is complete or a decision by a public agency to undertake a project, the lead agency shall provide formal notification to the designated contact of, or a tribal representative of, traditionally and culturally affiliated California Native American tribes that have requested notice, which shall be accomplished by means of at least one written notification that includes a brief description of the proposed project and its location, the lead agency contact information, and a notification that the California Native American tribe has 30 days to request consultation pursuant to this section. (Public Resources Code Section 21080.3.1(d)) The law does not preclude agencies from initiating consultation with the tribes that are culturally and traditionally affiliated with their jurisdictions. The NAHC believes that in fact that this is the best practice to ensure that tribes are consulted commensurate with the intent of the law. In accordance with Public Resources Code Section 21080.3.1(d), formal notification must include a brief description of the proposed project and its location, the lead agency contact information, and a notification that the California Native American tribe has 30 days to request consultation. The NAHC believes that agencies should also include with their notification letters information regarding any cultural resources assessment that has been completed on the APE, such as: 1. The results of any record search that may have been conducted at an Information Center of the California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS), including, but not limited to: • A listing of any and all known cultural resources have already been recorded on or adjacent to the APE; • Copies of any and all cultural resource records and study reports that may have been provided by the Information Center as part of the records search response; ■ If the probability is low, moderate, or high that cultural resources are located in the APE. • Whether the records search indicates a low, moderate or high probability that unrecorded cultural resources are located in the potential APE; and • If a survey is recommended by the Information Center to determine whether previously unrecorded cultural resources are present. 2. The results of any archaeological inventory survey that was conducted, including: Any report that may contain site forms, site significance, and suggested mitigation measurers. All information regarding site locations, Native American human remains, and associated funerary objects should be in a separate confidential addendum, and not be made available for pubic disclosure in accordance with Government Code Section 6254.10. 3. The results of any Sacred Lands File (SFL) check conducted through Native American Heritage Commission. The Sacred Lands File list is not exhaustive. A tribe may be the only source of information. 4. Any ethnographic studies conducted for any area including all or part of the potential APE; and 5. Any geotechnical reports regarding all or part of the potential APE. Lead agencies should be aware that records maintained by the NAHC and CHRIS is not exhaustive, and a negative response to these searches does not preclude the existence of a cultural place. A tribe may be the only source of information regarding the existence of a tribal cultural resource. This information will aid tribes in determining whether to request formal consultation. In the case that they do, having the information beforehand well help to facilitate the consultation process. If you receive notification of change of addresses and phone numbers from tribes, please notify me. With your assistance we are able to assure that our consultation list contains current information. If you have any questions, please contact me at my email address: gayle.totton@nahc.ca.gov. Sincerely, Totton, M.A., PhD. ssociate Governmental Program Analyst CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This communication with its contents may contain confidential and/or legally privileged information. It is solely for the use of the intended recipient(s). Unauthorized interception, review, use or disclosure is prohibited and may violate applicable laws including the Electronic Communications Privacy Act. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy all copies of the communication. Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians Jeff Grubbe, Chairperson 5401 Dinah Shore Drive Palm Springs, CA, 92264 Phone: (760) 699 - 6800 Fax: (760) 699-6919 Native American Heritage Commission Native American Contact List Riverside County 9/13/2016 Cahuilla Luiseno Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians Patricia Garcia -Plotkin, Director 5401 Dinah Shore Drive Cahuilla Palm Springs, CA, 92264 Luiseno Phone: (760) 699 - 6907 Fax: (760) 699-6924 ACBCI-THP0@aguacaliente.net Campo Band of Mission Indians Ralph Goff, Chairperson 36190 Church Road, Suite 1 Kumeyaay Campo, CA, 91906 Phone: (619)478-9046 Fax: (619)478-5818 rgoff@campo-nsn.gov Ewiiaapaayp Tribal Office Michael Garcia, Vice Chairperson 4054 Willows Road Kumeyaay Alpine, CA, 91901 Phone: (619)445-6315 Fax: (619)445-9126 michaelg@leaningrock.net Ewllaapaayp Tribal Office Robert Pinto, Chairperson 4054 Willows Road Alpine, CA, 91901 Phone: (619)445-6315 Fax: (619)445-9126 Jamul Indian Village Erica Pinto, Chairperson P.O. Box 612 Jamul, CA, 91935 Phone: (619)669-4785 Fax: (619)669-4817 Kumeyaay Kumeyaay La Jolla Band of Luiseno Indians Thomas Rodriguez, Chairperson 22000 Highway 76 Pauma Valley, CA, 92061 Phone: (760)742-3771 La Posta Band of Mission Indians Javaughn Miller, Tribal Administrator 8 Crestwood Road Boulevard, CA, 91905 Phone: (619)478-2113 Fax: (619)478-2125 jmiller@ Lapostatribe.net La Posta Band of Mission Indians Gwendolyn Parada, Chairperson 8 Crestwood Road Boulevard, CA, 91905 Phone: (619)478-2113 Fax: (619)478-2125 LP13boots@aol.com Manzanita Band of Kumeyaay Nation Nick Elliott, Cultural Resources Coordinator P. O. Box 1302 Boulevard, CA, 91905 Phone: (619) 766 - 4930 Fax: (619) 766-4957 nickmepa@yahoo.com Luiseno Kumeyaay Kumeyaay Kumeyaay Manzanita Band of Kumeyaay Nation Angela Elliott Santos, Chairperson P.O. Box 1302 Kumeyaay Boulevard, CA, 91905 Phone: (619) 766 - 4930 Fax: (619) 766-4957 This list Is current only as of the date of this document. Distribution of this list does not relieve any person of statutory responsibility as defined in Section 7050.5 of the Health and Salety Code, Section 5097.94 of the Pudic Resource Section 5097.98 of the Public Resourcos Codo. This list is only applicable for contacting local Native Americans with regard to cultural resources assessment for the proposed Pechanga Parkway Widening, Riverside County. PRO3-002153 09/13/2016 08:20 AM 1 of 3 Mesa Grande Band of Mission Indians Virgil Oyos, Chairperson P.O Box 270 Santa Ysabel, CA, 92070 Phone: (760)782-3818 Fax: (760)782-9092 mesagrandeband@msn.com Pala Band of Mission Indians Shasta Gaughan, Tribal Historic Preservation Officer PMB 50, 35008 Pala Temecula Rd. Pala, CA, 92059 Phone: (760) 891 - 3515 Fax: (760) 742-3189 sgaughen@palatribe.com Pauma Band of Luiseno Indians - Pauma & Yuima Reservation Temet Aguilar, Chairperson P.O. Box 369, Ext. 303 Pauma Valley, CA, 92061 Phone: (760)742-1289 Fax: (760)742-3422 Pechanga Band of Mission Indians Paul Macarro, Cultural Resources Manager P.O. Box 1477 Temecula, CA, 92593 Phone: (951) 770 - 8100 Fax: (951) 506-9491 pmacarro@pechanga-nsn.gov Pechanga Band of Mission Indians Anna Hoover, Cultural Analyst P. O. Box 2183 Temecula, CA, 92593 Phone: (951) 770 - 8104 Fax: (951) 694-0446 ahoover@pechanga-nsn.gov Native American Heritage Commission Native American Contact List Riverside County 9/13/2016 Kumeyaay Cupeno Luiseno Luiseno Luiseno Luiseno Pechanga Band of Mission Indians Mark Macarro, Chairperson P.O. Box 1477 Temecula, CA, 92593 Phone: (951) 770 - 6000 Fax: (951) 695-1778 striplett@pechanga-nsn.gov Rincon Band of Mission Indians Bo Mazzetti, Chairperson 1 West Tribal Road Valley Center, CA, 92082 Phone: (760)749-1051 Fax: (760)749-5144 bomazzetti@aol.com Rincon Band of Mission Indians Jim McPherson, Tribal Historic Preservation Officer 1 West Tribal Road Vailey Center, CA, 92082 Phone: (760)749-1051 Fax: (760)749-5144 ywhipple@rincontribe.org San Luis Rey Band of Mission Indians 1889 Sunset Drive Vista, CA, 92081 Phone: (760) 724 - 8505 Fax: (760) 724-2172 cjmojado@slrmissionindians.org San Luis Rey Band of Mission Indians San Luis Rey, Tribal Council 1889 Sunset Drive Vista, CA, 92081 Phone: (760)724-8505 Fax: (760)724-2172 cjmojado@slrmissionindians.org San Pasqua! Band of Mission Indians Allen E. Lawson, Chairperson P.O. Box 365 Valley Center, CA, 92082 Phone: (760)749-3200 Fax: (760)749-3876 allenl@sanpasqualtribe.org Luiseno Luiseno Luiseno Luiseno Luiseno Kumeyaay This list Is current only as of the date of this document. nlstdbutton of this list does not relieve any person of statutory responsibility as defined In Section 7050.5 of the FleaIlh and Safety Code, Section 5097.94 of the Public Resource Section 5097.98 of the Public Resources Coda. This list is only applicable for contacting mal Native Americans with regard to cultural resources assessment for the proposed Pechanga Parkway Widening, Riverside County. PRO3-002153 09/13/2016 08:20 AM 2 of 3 San Pasqua! Band of Mission Indians John Flores, Environmental Coordinator P. O. Box 365 Valley Center, CA, 92082 Phone: (760) 749 - 3200 Fax: (760) 749-3876 johnf@sanpasqualtribe.org Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians Joseph Ontiveros, Cultural Resource Department P.O. BOX 487 San Jacinto, CA, 92581 Phone: (951)663-5279 Fax: (951)654-4198 jontiveros@soboba-nsn.gov Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians Carrie Garcia, Cultural Resources Manager P. O. Box 487 San Jacinto, CA, 92583 Phone: (951)654-2765 Fax: (951)654-4198 carrieg@soboba-nsn.gov Sycuan Band of the Kumeyaay Nation Cody J. Martinez, Chairperson 1 Kwaaypaay Court El Cajon, CA, 92019 Phone: (619)445-2613 Fax: (619)445-1927 ssilva@sycuan-nsn.gov Sycuan Band of the Kumeyaay Nation Lisa Haws, Cultural Resources Manager 1 Kwaaypaay Court El Cajon, CA, 92019 Phone: (619) 445 - 4564 Native American Heritage Commission Native American Contact List Riverside County 9/13/2016 Kumeyaay Cahuilla Luiseno Cahuilla Luiseno Kumeyaay Kumeyaay Viejas Band of Kumeyaay Indians Robert J. Welch, Chairperson 1 Viejas Grade Road Alpine, CA, 91901 Phone: (619)445-3810 Fax: (619)445-5337 jhagen@viejas-nsn.gov Viejas Band of Kumeyaay Indians Julie Hagen, 1 Viejas Grade Road Alpine, CA, 91901 Phone: (619) 445 - 3810 Fax: (619) 445-5337 jhagen@viejas-nsn.gov Kumeyaay Kumeyaay This list Is current only as of the date o1 this document. Distribution of this list does not relieve any person o1 statutory responsibility as defined in Section 7050.5 of the Health and Safety Code, Section 5097.94 of the Public Resource Section 5097.98 o1 the Public Resources Code. This list is only applicable for contacting local Native Americans with regard to cultural resources assessment for the proposed Pechanga Parkway widening, Riverside County. PROJ-002153 09/13/2016 08:20 AM 3 of 3 Native American Consultation Summary for the Pechanga Widening Project, Temecula, Riverside County, California Native American Heritage Commission replied to BCR Consulting Request on September 13, 2016. Results of Sacred Land File Search DID INDICATE presence of Native American cultural resources that could be impacted, and recommended that Pechanga Band of Mission Indians as well as the below groups/individuals be contacted. Groups Contacted Letter/Email Date Response from Tribes Jeff Grubbe, Chairperson Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians Letter: 9/16/16 Email: N/A None Thomas Rodriguez, Chairperson La Jolla Band of Luiseno Indians Letter: 9/16/16 Email: N/A None Patricia Garcia -Plotkin, Director Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians Letter: 9/16/16 Email: 9/17/16 None Javaughn Miller, Tribal Administrator La Posta Band of Mission Indians Letter: 9/16/16 Email: 9/17/16 None Ralph Goff, Chairperson Campo Band of Mission Indians Letter: 9/16/16 Email: 9/17/16 None Gwendolyn Parada, Chairperson La Posta Band of Mission Indians Letter: 9/16/16 Email: 9/17/16 None Michael Garcia, Vice Chairperson Ewiiaapaayp Tribal Office Letter: 9/16/16 Email: 9/17/16 None Nick Elliot, Cultural Resources Coordinator Manzanita Band of Kumeyaay Nation Letter: 9/16/16 Email: 9/17/16 None Robert Pinto, Chairperson Ewiiaapaayp Tribal Office Letter: 9/16/16 Email: N/A None Angela Elliot Santos, Chairperson Manzanita Band of Kumeyaay Nation Letter: 9/16/16 Email: N/A None Erica Pinto, Chairperson Jamul Indian Village Letter: 9/16/16 Email: N/A None Virgil Oyos, Chairperson Morongo Band of Mission Indians Letter: 9/16/16 Email: 9/17/16 None Mark Macarro, Chairperson Pechanga Band of Mission Indians Letter: 9/16/16 Email: 9/17/16 None Shasta Gaughen, Historic Preservation Office Pala Band of Mission Indians Letter: 9/16/16 Email: 9/17/16 None Bo Mazzetti, Chairperson Rincon Band of Mission Indians Letter: 9/16/16 Email: 9/17/16 None Groups Contacted Letter/Email Date Response from Tribes Temet Aguilar, Chairperson Pauma & Yuima Reservation Letter: 9/16/16 Email: N/A None Jim McPherson, Tribal Historic Preservation Officer Rincon Band of Mission Indians Letter: 9/16/16 Email: 9/17/16 None Paul Macarro, Cultural Resources Manager Pechanga Band of Mission Indians Letter: 9/16/16 Email: 9/17/16 None San Luis Rey Band of Mission Indians Letter: 9/16/16 Email: 9/17/16 None Anna Hoover, Cultural Analyst Pechanga Cultural Resources Department Letter: 9/16/16 Email: 9/17/16 None Tribal Council San Luis Rey Band of Mission Indians Letter: 9/16/16 Email: 9/17/16 None Allen E. Lawson, Chairperson San Pasqual Band of Mission Indians Letter: 9/16/16 Email: 9/17/16 None John Flores, Environmental Coordinator San Pasqua) Band of Mission Indians Letter: 9/16/16 Email: 9/17/16 None Robert Welch, Chairperson Viejas Band of Kumeyaay Indians Letter: 9/16/16 Email: 9/17/16 None Joseph Ontiveros, Cultural Resources Department Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians Letter: 9/16/16 Email: 9/17/16 None Julie Hagen Viejas Band of Kumeyaay Indians Letter: 9/16/16 Email: 9/17/16 None Carrie Garcia, Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians Cultural Resources Manager Letter: 9/16/16 Email: 9/17/16 None Cody J. Martinez, Chairperson Sycuan Band of the Kumeyaay Nation Letter: 9/16/16 Email: 9/17/16 None Lisa Haws, Cultural Resources Manager Sycuan Band of the Kumeyaay Nation Letter: 9/16/16 Email: N/A None BCRCOp www.bcrconsulting.net CIa'e^�°^' NSULTING LLC ARCHAEOLOGY HISTORIC PRESERVATION PALEONTOLOGY GIS 909.525.7078 7,; ,,p, September 16, 2016 Jeff Grubbe Chairperson Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians 5401 Dinah Shore Drive Palm Springs, California 92264 Subject: Tribal Scoping for the Pechanga Parkway Widening Project, Temecula, Riverside County, California Dear Mr. Chairperson: This is a tribal scoping letter to solicit your comments on a proposed development project at locations with which you have tribal cultural affiliation. The purpose of the tribal scoping is to ensure the protection of Native American cultural resources on which the proposed undertaking may have an impact. In the tribal scoping process, early communication is encouraged in order to provide for full and reasonable public input from Native American groups and individuals. We understand that much of the content of the communications will be confidential and will include, but not be limited to, the relationship of proposed project details to Native American Cultural Historic Properties, such as burial sites, known or unknown, architectural features and artifacts, ceremonial sites, sacred shrines, and cultural landscapes. The proposed project is located in a non -sectioned portion of Township 8 South, Range 2 West, San Bernardino Baseline and Meridian. The property is depicted on the Temecula (1975), and Pechanga (1997) California 7.5 -minute USGS topographic quadrangles, (see attached map). The lead agency is the City of Temecula. If you know of any cultural resources in the vicinity that may be of religious and/or cultural significance to your community or if you would like more information, please contact me at 909-525-7078 or david.brunzell@yahoo.com. Correspondence can also be sent to BCR Consulting LLC, Attn: David Brunzell, 1420 Guadalajara Place, Claremont, California 91711. I request a response by October 20, 2016. If you require more time, please let me know. Thank you for your involvement in this process. Sincerely, BCR Consulting LLC David Brunzell, M.A./RPA Principal Investigator/Archaeologist Attachment: USGS Map BCRCOp www.bcrconsulting. net Cb,eo,om NSULTING LLC ARCHAEOLOGY HISTORIC PRESERVATION PALEONTOLOGY GIS 909.525.7078 T,,"'P',t,,,, September 16, 2016 Thomas Rodriguez Chairperson La Jolla Band of Luiseno Indians 22000 Highway 76 Pauma Valley, California 92061 Subject: Tribal Scoping for the Pechanga Parkway Widening Project, Temecula, Riverside County, California Dear Mr. Chairperson: This is a tribal scoping letter to solicit your comments on a proposed development project at locations with which you have tribal cultural affiliation. The purpose of the tribal scoping is to ensure the protection of Native American cultural resources on which the proposed undertaking may have an impact. In the tribal scoping process, early communication is encouraged in order to provide for full and reasonable public input from Native American groups and individuals. We understand that much of the content of the communications will be confidential and will include, but not be limited to, the relationship of proposed project details to Native American Cultural Historic Properties, such as burial sites, known or unknown, architectural features and artifacts, ceremonial sites, sacred shrines, and cultural landscapes. The proposed project is located in a non -sectioned portion of Township 8 South, Range 2 West, San Bernardino Baseline and Meridian. The property is depicted on the Temecula (1975), and Pechanga (1997) California 7.5 -minute USGS topographic quadrangles, (see attached map). The lead agency is the City of Temecula. If you know of any cultural resources in the vicinity that may be of religious and/or cultural significance to your community or if you would like more information, please contact me at 909-525-7078 or david.brunzell@yahoo.com. Correspondence can also be sent to BCR Consulting LLC, Attn: David Brunzell, 1420 Guadalajara Place, Claremont, California 91711. I request a response by October 20, 2016. If you require more time, please let me know. Thank you for your involvement in this process. Sincerely, BCR Consulting LLC David Brunzell, M.A./RPA Principal Investigator/Archaeologist Attachment: USGS Map www.bcrconsuking.net Na n,ont BCRCONSULTING LLC ARCHAEOLOGY HISTORIC PRESERVATION PALEONTOLOGY GIS 909.525.7078 TM ap September 16, 2016 Patricia Garcia -Plotkin Director Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians 5401 Dinah Shore Drive Palm Springs, California 92264 Subject: Tribal Scoping for the Pechanga Parkway Widening Project, Temecula, Riverside County, California Dear Patricia: This is a tribal scoping letter to solicit your comments on a proposed development project at locations with which you have tribal cultural affiliation. The purpose of the tribal scoping is to ensure the protection of Native American cultural resources on which the proposed undertaking may have an impact. In the tribal scoping process, early communication is encouraged in order to provide for full and reasonable public input from Native American groups and individuals. We understand that much of the content of the communications will be confidential and will include, but not be limited to, the relationship of proposed project details to Native American Cultural Historic Properties, such as burial sites, known or unknown, architectural features and artifacts, ceremonial sites, sacred shrines, and cultural landscapes. The proposed project is located in a non -sectioned portion of Township 8 South, Range 2 West, San Bernardino Baseline and Meridian. The property is depicted on the Temecula (1975), and Pechanga (1997) California 7.5 -minute USGS topographic quadrangles, (see attached map). The lead agency is the City of Temecula. If you know of any cultural resources in the vicinity that may be of religious and/or cultural significance to your community or if you would like more information, please contact me at 909-525-7078 or david.brunzell@yahoo.com. Correspondence can also be sent to BCR Consulting LLC, Attn: David Brunzell, 1420 Guadalajara Place, Claremont, California 91711. I request a response by October 20, 2016. If you require more time, please let me know. Thank you for your involvement in this process. Sincerely, BCR Consulting LLC David Brunzell, M.A./RPA Principal Investigator/Archaeologist Attachment: USGS Map BCRCONSULTING LLC ARCHAEOLOGY HISTORIC PRESERVATION PALEONTOLOGY GIS www.bcr90 52570781wachaw September 16, 2016 Javaughn Miller Tribal Administrator La Posta Band of Mission Indians 8 Crestwood Road Boulevard, California 91905 Subject: Tribal Scoping for the Pechanga Parkway Widening Project, Temecula, Riverside County, California Dear Javaughn: This is a tribal scoping letter to solicit your comments on a proposed development project at locations with which you have tribal cultural affiliation. The purpose of the tribal scoping is to ensure the protection of Native American cultural resources on which the proposed undertaking may have an impact. In the tribal scoping process, early communication is encouraged in order to provide for full and reasonable public input from Native American groups and individuals. We understand that much of the content of the communications will be confidential and will include, but not be limited to, the relationship of proposed project details to Native American Cultural Historic Properties, such as burial sites, known or unknown, architectural features and artifacts, ceremonial sites, sacred shrines, and cultural landscapes. The proposed project is located in a non -sectioned portion of Township 8 South, Range 2 West, San Bernardino Baseline and Meridian. The property is depicted on the Temecula (1975), and Pechanga (1997) California 7.5 -minute USGS topographic quadrangles, (see attached map). The lead agency is the City of Temecula. If you know of any cultural resources in the vicinity that may be of religious and/or cultural significance to your community or if you would like more information, please contact me at 909-525-7078 or david.brunzell@yahoo.com. Correspondence can also be sent to BCR Consulting LLC, Attn: David Brunzell, 1420 Guadalajara Place, Claremont, California 91711. I request a response by October 20, 2016. If you require more time, please let me know. Thank you for your involvement in this process. Sincerely, BCR Consulting LLC David Brunzell, M.A./RPA Principal Investigator/Archaeologist Attachment: USGS Map www.bcrconsulting.net C",°"'°°' BCRCONSULTING LLC ARCHAEOLOGY HISTORIC PRESERVATION PALEONTOLOGY GIS 909.525.7078 =haw September 16, 2016 Ralph Goff Chairperson Campo Band of Mission Indians 36190 Church Road, Suite 1 Campo, California 91906 Subject: Tribal Scoping for the Pechanga Parkway Widening Project, Temecula, Riverside County, California Dear Mr. Chairperson: This is a tribal scoping letter to solicit your comments on a proposed development project at locations with which you have tribal cultural affiliation. The purpose of the tribal scoping is to ensure the protection of Native American cultural resources on which the proposed undertaking may have an impact. In the tribal scoping process, early communication is encouraged in order to provide for full and reasonable public input from Native American groups and individuals. We understand that much of the content of the communications will be confidential and will include, but not be limited to, the relationship of proposed project details to Native American Cultural Historic Properties, such as burial sites, known or unknown, architectural features and artifacts, ceremonial sites, sacred shrines, and cultural landscapes. The proposed project is located in a non -sectioned portion of Township 8 South, Range 2 West, San Bernardino Baseline and Meridian. The property is depicted on the Temecula (1975), and Pechanga (1997) California 7.5 -minute USGS topographic quadrangles, (see attached map). The lead agency is the City of Temecula. If you know of any cultural resources in the vicinity that may be of religious and/or cultural significance to your community or if you would like more information, please contact me at 909-525-7078 or david.brunzell@yahoo.com. Correspondence can also be sent to BCR Consulting LLC, Attn: David Brunzell, 1420 Guadalajara Place, Claremont, California 91711. I request a response by October 20, 2016. If you require more time, please let me know. Thank you for your involvement in this process. Sincerely, BCR Consulting LLC David Brunzell, M.A./RPA Principal Investigator/Archaeologist Attachment: USGS Map consultin BCRCONSULTING LLC ARCHAEOLOGY HISTORIC PRESERVATION PALEONTOLOGY GIS www.bcr909.5257078I,"'p° September 16, 2016 Gwendolyn Parada Chairperson La Posta Band of Mission Indians 8 Crestwood Road Boulevard, California 91905 Subject: Tribal Scoping for the Pechanga Parkway Widening Project, Temecula, Riverside County, California Dear Ms. Chairperson: This is a tribal scoping letter to solicit your comments on a proposed development project at locations with which you have tribal cultural affiliation. The purpose of the tribal scoping is to ensure the protection of Native American cultural resources on which the proposed undertaking may have an impact. In the tribal scoping process, early communication is encouraged in order to provide for full and reasonable public input from Native American groups and individuals. We understand that much of the content of the communications will be confidential and will include, but not be limited to, the relationship of proposed project details to Native American Cultural Historic Properties, such as burial sites, known or unknown, architectural features and artifacts, ceremonial sites, sacred shrines, and cultural landscapes. The proposed project is located in a non -sectioned portion of Township 8 South, Range 2 West, San Bernardino Baseline and Meridian. The property is depicted on the Temecula (1975), and Pechanga (1997) California 7.5 -minute USGS topographic quadrangles, (see attached map). The lead agency is the City of Temecula. If you know of any cultural resources in the vicinity that may be of religious and/or cultural significance to your community or if you would like more information, please contact me at 909-525-7078 or david.brunzell@yahoo.com. Correspondence can also be sent to BCR Consulting LLC, Attn: David Brunzell, 1420 Guadalajara Place, Claremont, California 91711. I request a response by October 20, 2016. If you require more time, please let me know. Thank you for your involvement in this process. Sincerely, BCR Consulting LLC David Brunzell, M.A./RPA Principal Investigator/Archaeologist Attachment: USGS Map www. bcrconsulting.net c2-0", BCRCONSULTING LLC ARCHAEOLOGY HISTORIC PRESERVATION PALEONTOLOGY GIS 909.5257078re:ac, September 16, 2016 Michael Garcia Vice Chairperson Ewiiaapaayp Tribal Office 4054 Willows Road Alpine, California 91901 Subject: Tribal Scoping for the Pechanga Parkway Widening Project, Temecula, Riverside County, California Dear Michael: This is a tribal scoping letter to solicit your comments on a proposed development project at locations with which you have tribal cultural affiliation. The purpose of the tribal scoping is to ensure the protection of Native American cultural resources on which the proposed undertaking may have an impact. In the tribal scoping process, early communication is encouraged in order to provide for full and reasonable public input from Native American groups and individuals. We understand that much of the content of the communications will be confidential and will include, but not be limited to, the relationship of proposed project details to Native American Cultural Historic Properties, such as burial sites, known or unknown, architectural features and artifacts, ceremonial sites, sacred shrines, and cultural landscapes. The proposed project is located in a non -sectioned portion of Township 8 South, Range 2 West, San Bernardino Baseline and Meridian. The property is depicted on the Temecula (1975), and Pechanga (1997) California 7.5 -minute USGS topographic quadrangles, (see attached map). The lead agency is the City of Temecula. If you know of any cultural resources in the vicinity that may be of religious and/or cultural significance to your community or if you would like more information, please contact me at 909-525-7078 or david.brunzell@yahoo.com. Correspondence can also be sent to BCR Consulting LLC, Attn: David Brunzell, 1420 Guadalajara Place, Claremont, California 91711. I request a response by October 20, 2016. If you require more time, please let me know. Thank you for your involvement in this process. Sincerely, BCR Consulting LLC David Brunzell, M.A./RPA Principal Investigator/Archaeologist Attachment: USGS Map www.bcrconsufting.net B C R CO N S U LT I N G LLC ARCHAEOLOGY HISTORIC PRESERVATION PALEONTOLOGY GIS 909.525.7078=chap. September 16, 2016 Nick Elliot Cultural Resources Coordinator Manzanita Band of Kumeyaay Nation P.O. Box 1302 Boulevard, California 91905 Subject: Tribal Scoping for the Pechanga Parkway Widening Project, Temecula, Riverside County, California Dear Nick: This is a tribal scoping letter to solicit your comments on a proposed development project at locations with which you have tribal cultural affiliation. The purpose of the tribal scoping is to ensure the protection of Native American cultural resources on which the proposed undertaking may have an impact. In the tribal scoping process, early communication is encouraged in order to provide for full and reasonable public input from Native American groups and individuals. We understand that much of the content of the communications will be confidential and will include, but not be limited to, the relationship of proposed project details to Native American Cultural Historic Properties, such as burial sites, known or unknown, architectural features and artifacts, ceremonial sites, sacred shrines, and cultural landscapes. The proposed project is located in a non -sectioned portion of Township 8 South, Range 2 West, San Bernardino Baseline and Meridian. The property is depicted on the Temecula (1975), and Pechanga (1997) California 7.5 -minute USGS topographic quadrangles, (see attached map). The lead agency is the City of Temecula. If you know of any cultural resources in the vicinity that may be of religious and/or cultural significance to your community or if you would like more information, please contact me at 909-525-7078 or david.brunzell@yahoo.com. Correspondence can also be sent to BCR Consulting LLC, Attn: David Brunzell, 1420 Guadalajara Place, Claremont, California 91711. I request a response by October 20, 2016. If you require more time, please let me know. Thank you for your involvement in this process. Sincerely, BCR Consulting LLC David Brunzell, M.A./RPA Principal Investigator/Archaeologist Attachment: USGS Map BCRCONSULTING LLC ARCHAEOLOGY HISTORIC PRESERVATION PALEONTOLOGY GIS www.bcrconsulting.net 909.525 7078aCI ,e°^' ,a September 16, 2016 Robert Pinto Sr. Chairperson Ewiiaapaayp Tribal Office 4054 Willows Road Alpine, California 91901 Subject: Tribal Scoping for the Pechanga Parkway Widening Project, Temecula, Riverside County, California Dear Mr. Chairperson: This is a tribal scoping letter to solicit your comments on a proposed development project at locations with which you have tribal cultural affiliation. The purpose of the tribal scoping is to ensure the protection of Native American cultural resources on which the proposed undertaking may have an impact. In the tribal scoping process, early communication is encouraged in order to provide for full and reasonable public input from Native American groups and individuals. We understand that much of the content of the communications will be confidential and will include, but not be limited to, the relationship of proposed project details to Native American Cultural Historic Properties, such as burial sites, known or unknown, architectural features and artifacts, ceremonial sites, sacred shrines, and cultural landscapes. The proposed project is located in a non -sectioned portion of Township 8 South, Range 2 West, San Bernardino Baseline and Meridian. The property is depicted on the Temecula (1975), and Pechanga (1997) California 7.5 -minute USGS topographic quadrangles, (see attached map). The lead agency is the City of Temecula. If you know of any cultural resources in the vicinity that may be of religious and/or cultural significance to your community or if you would like more information, please contact me at 909-525-7078 or david.brunzell@yahoo.com. Correspondence can also be sent to BCR Consulting LLC, Attn: David Brunzell, 1420 Guadalajara Place, Claremont, California 91711. I request a response by October 20, 2016. If you require more time, please let me know. Thank you for your involvement in this process. Sincerely, BCR Consulting LLC David Brunzell, M.A./RPA Principal Investigator/Archaeologist Attachment: USGS Map www.bcrconsulting.net C1feflOn1 BCRCONSULTING LLC ARCHAEOLOGY HISTORIC PRESERVATION PALEONTOLOGY GIS909.525.7078 TT,,,, September 16, 2016 Angela Elliot Santos Chairperson Manzanita Band of Kumeyaay Nation P.O. Box 1302 Boulevard, California 91905 Subject: Tribal Scoping for the Pechanga Parkway Widening Project, Temecula, Riverside County, California Dear Ms. Chairperson: This is a tribal scoping letter to solicit your comments on a proposed development project at locations with which you have tribal cultural affiliation. The purpose of the tribal scoping is to ensure the protection of Native American cultural resources on which the proposed undertaking may have an impact. In the tribal scoping process, early communication is encouraged in order to provide for full and reasonable public input from Native American groups and individuals. We understand that much of the content of the communications will be confidential and will include, but not be limited to, the relationship of proposed project details to Native American Cultural Historic Properties, such as burial sites, known or unknown, architectural features and artifacts, ceremonial sites, sacred shrines, and cultural landscapes. The proposed project is located in a non -sectioned portion of Township 8 South, Range 2 West, San Bernardino Baseline and Meridian. The property is depicted on the Temecula (1975), and Pechanga (1997) California 7.5 -minute USGS topographic quadrangles, (see attached map). The lead agency is the City of Temecula. If you know of any cultural resources in the vicinity that may be of religious and/or cultural significance to your community or if you would like more information, please contact me at 909-525-7078 or david.brunzell@yahoo.com. Correspondence can also be sent to BCR Consulting LLC, Attn: David Brunzell, 1420 Guadalajara Place, Claremont, California 91711. I request a response by October 20, 2016. If you require more time, please let me know. Thank you for your involvement in this process. Sincerely, BCR Consulting LLC David Brunzell, M.A./RPA Principal Investigator/Archaeologist Attachment: USGS Map www.bcrconsutting. net CiaromoM BCRCONSULTING LLC ARCHAEOLOGY HISTORIC PRESERVATION PALEONTOLOGY GIS 909.525.7078 ate, September 16, 2016 Erica Pinto Chairperson Jamul Indian Reservation P.O. Box 612 Jamul, California 91935 Subject: Tribal Scoping for the Pechanga Parkway Widening Project, Temecula, Riverside County, California Dear Ms. Chairperson: This is a tribal scoping letter to solicit your comments on a proposed development project at locations with which you have tribal cultural affiliation. The purpose of the tribal scoping is to ensure the protection of Native American cultural resources on which the proposed undertaking may have an impact. In the tribal scoping process, early communication is encouraged in order to provide for full and reasonable public input from Native American groups and individuals. We understand that much of the content of the communications will be confidential and will include, but not be limited to, the relationship of proposed project details to Native American Cultural Historic Properties, such as burial sites, known or unknown, architectural features and artifacts, ceremonial sites, sacred shrines, and cultural landscapes. The proposed project is located in a non -sectioned portion of Township 8 South, Range 2 West, San Bernardino Baseline and Meridian. The property is depicted on the Temecula (1975), and Pechanga (1997) California 7.5 -minute USGS topographic quadrangles, (see attached map). The lead agency is the City of Temecula. If you know of any cultural resources in the vicinity that may be of religious and/or cultural significance to your community or if you would like more information, please contact me at 909-525-7078 or david.brunzell@yahoo.com. Correspondence can also be sent to BCR Consulting LLC, Attn: David Brunzell, 1420 Guadalajara Place, Claremont, California 91711. I request a response by October 20, 2016. If you require more time, please let me know. Thank you for your involvement in this process. Sincerely, BCR Consulting LLC David Brunzell, M.A./RPA Principal Investigator/Archaeologist Attachment: USGS Map www.bcrconsulting.net C"'""'°"' BCRCONSULTING LLC ARCHAEOLOGY HISTORIC PRESERVATION PALEONTOLOGY GIS 909 525.7078 e"x,,,,, September 16, 2016 Virgil Oyos Chairperson Morongo Band of Mission Indians P.O. Box 270 Santa Ysabel, California 92070 Subject: Tribal Scoping for the Pechanga Parkway Widening Project, Temecula, Riverside County, California Dear Mr. Chairperson: This is a tribal scoping letter to solicit your comments on a proposed development project at locations with which you have tribal cultural affiliation. The purpose of the tribal scoping is to ensure the protection of Native American cultural resources on which the proposed undertaking may have an impact. In the tribal scoping process, early communication is encouraged in order to provide for full and reasonable public input from Native American groups and individuals. We understand that much of the content of the communications will be confidential and will include, but not be limited to, the relationship of proposed project details to Native American Cultural Historic Properties, such as burial sites, known or unknown, architectural features and artifacts, ceremonial sites, sacred shrines, and cultural landscapes. The proposed project is located in a non -sectioned portion of Township 8 South, Range 2 West, San Bernardino Baseline and Meridian. The property is depicted on the Temecula (1975), and Pechanga (1997) California 7.5 -minute USGS topographic quadrangles, (see attached map). The lead agency is the City of Temecula. If you know of any cultural resources in the vicinity that may be of religious and/or cultural significance to your community or if you would like more information, please contact me at 909-525-7078 or david.brunzell@yahoo.com. Correspondence can also be sent to BCR Consulting LLC, Attn: David Brunzell, 1420 Guadalajara Place, Claremont, California 91711. I request a response by October 20, 2016. If you require more time, please let me know. Thank you for your involvement in this process. Sincerely, BCR Consulting LLC David Brunzell, M.A./RPA Principal Investigator/Archaeologist Attachment: USGS Map www.bcrconsulting.net N' a" BC RCONSULTING LLC ARCHAEOLOGY HISTORIC PRESERVATION PALEONTOLOGY GIS 909.525.7078 =hap September 16, 2016 Mark Macarro Chairperson Pechanga Band of Mission Indians P.O. Box 1477 Temecula, California 92593 Subject: Tribal Scoping for the Pechanga Parkway Widening Project, Temecula, Riverside County, California Dear Mr. Chairperson: This is a tribal scoping letter to solicit your comments on a proposed development project at locations with which you have tribal cultural affiliation. The purpose of the tribal scoping is to ensure the protection of Native American cultural resources on which the proposed undertaking may have an impact. In the tribal scoping process, early communication is encouraged in order to provide for full and reasonable public input from Native American groups and individuals. We understand that much of the content of the communications will be confidential and will include, but not be limited to, the relationship of proposed project details to Native American Cultural Historic Properties, such as burial sites, known or unknown, architectural features and artifacts, ceremonial sites, sacred shrines, and cultural landscapes. The proposed project is located in a non -sectioned portion of Township 8 South, Range 2 West, San Bernardino Baseline and Meridian. The property is depicted on the Temecula (1975), and Pechanga (1997) California 7.5 -minute USGS topographic quadrangles, (see attached map). The lead agency is the City of Temecula. If you know of any cultural resources in the vicinity that may be of religious and/or cultural significance to your community or if you would like more information, please contact me at 909-525-7078 or david.brunzell@yahoo.com. Correspondence can also be sent to BCR Consulting LLC, Attn: David Brunzell, 1420 Guadalajara Place, Claremont, California 91711. I request a response by October 20, 2016. If you require more time, please let me know. Thank you for your involvement in this process. Sincerely, BCR Consulting LLC David Brunzell, M.A./RPA Principal Investigator/Archaeologist Attachment: USGS Map www.bcrconsulting.net c"'°'"°"' BCRCONSULTING LLC ARCHAEOLOGY HISTORIC PRESERVATION PALEONTOLOGY GIS 909.525.7078"re°p,°x,,,,, September 16, 2016 Shasta Gaughen Historic Preservation Office Pala Band of Mission Indians 35008 Pala Temecula Road, PMB Pala, California 92059 Subject: Tribal Scoping for the Pechanga Parkway Widening Project, Temecula, Riverside County, California Dear Shasta: This is a tribal scoping letter to solicit your comments on a proposed development project at locations with which you have tribal cultural affiliation. The purpose of the tribal scoping is to ensure the protection of Native American cultural resources on which the proposed undertaking may have an impact. In the tribal scoping process, early communication is encouraged in order to provide for full and reasonable public input from Native American groups and individuals. We understand that much of the content of the communications will be confidential and will include, but not be limited to, the relationship of proposed project details to Native American Cultural Historic Properties, such as burial sites, known or unknown, architectural features and artifacts, ceremonial sites, sacred shrines, and cultural landscapes. The proposed project is located in a non -sectioned portion of Township 8 South, Range 2 West, San Bernardino Baseline and Meridian. The property is depicted on the Temecula (1975), and Pechanga (1997) California 7.5 -minute USGS topographic quadrangles, (see attached map). The lead agency is the City of Temecula. If you know of any cultural resources in the vicinity that may be of religious and/or cultural significance to your community or if you would like more information, please contact me at 909-525-7078 or david.brunzell@yahoo.com. Correspondence can also be sent to BCR Consulting LLC, Attn: David Brunzell, 1420 Guadalajara Place, Claremont, California 91711. I request a response by October 20, 2016. If you require more time, please let me know. Thank you for your involvement in this process. Sincerely, BCR Consulting LLC David Brunzell, M.A./RPA Principal Investigator/Archaeologist Attachment: USGS Map www. bcrconsulting BCRCONSULTING LLC ARCHAEOLOGY HISTORIC PRESERVATION PALEONTOLOGY GIS 909.525.7078N, September 16, 2016 Bo Mazzetti Chairperson Rincon Band of Mission Indians 1 West Tribal Road Valley Center, California 92082 Subject: Tribal Scoping for the Pechanga Parkway Widening Project, Temecula, Riverside County, California Dear Mr. Chairperson: This is a tribal scoping letter to solicit your comments on a proposed development project at locations with which you have tribal cultural affiliation. The purpose of the tribal scoping is to ensure the protection of Native American cultural resources on which the proposed undertaking may have an impact. In the tribal scoping process, early communication is encouraged in order to provide for full and reasonable public input from Native American groups and individuals. We understand that much of the content of the communications will be confidential and will include, but not be limited to, the relationship of proposed project details to Native American Cultural Historic Properties, such as burial sites, known or unknown, architectural features and artifacts, ceremonial sites, sacred shrines, and cultural landscapes. The proposed project is located in a non -sectioned portion of Township 8 South, Range 2 West, San Bernardino Baseline and Meridian. The property is depicted on the Temecula (1975), and Pechanga (1997) California 7.5 -minute USGS topographic quadrangles, (see attached map). The lead agency is the City of Temecula. If you know of any cultural resources in the vicinity that may be of religious and/or cultural significance to your community or if you would like more information, please contact me at 909-525-7078 or david.brunzell@yahoo.com. Correspondence can also be sent to BCR Consulting LLC, Attn: David Brunzell, 1420 Guadalajara Place, Claremont, California 91711. I request a response by October 20, 2016. If you require more time, please let me know. Thank you for your involvement in this process. Sincerely, BCR Consulting LLC David Brunzell, M.A./RPA Principal Investigator/Archaeologist Attachment: USGS Map www.bcrconsulting.net OOt BCRCONSULTING LLC ARCHAEOLOGY HISTORIC PRESERVATION PALEONTOLOGY GIS 909.525.707411w, September 16, 2016 Temet Aguilar Chairperson Pauma & Yuima Reservation P.O. Box 369 Pauma Valley, California 92061 Subject: Tribal Scoping for the Pechanga Parkway Widening Project, Temecula, Riverside County, California Dear Mr. Chairperson: This is a tribal scoping letter to solicit your comments on a proposed development project at locations with which you have tribal cultural affiliation. The purpose of the tribal scoping is to ensure the protection of Native American cultural resources on which the proposed undertaking may have an impact. In the tribal scoping process, early communication is encouraged in order to provide for full and reasonable public input from Native American groups and individuals. We understand that much of the content of the communications will be confidential and will include, but not be limited to, the relationship of proposed project details to Native American Cultural Historic Properties, such as burial sites, known or unknown, architectural features and artifacts, ceremonial sites, sacred shrines, and cultural landscapes. The proposed project is located in a non -sectioned portion of Township 8 South, Range 2 West, San Bernardino Baseline and Meridian. The property is depicted on the Temecula (1975), and Pechanga (1997) California 7.5 -minute USGS topographic quadrangles, (see attached map). The lead agency is the City of Temecula. If you know of any cultural resources in the vicinity that may be of religious and/or cultural significance to your community or if you would like more information, please contact me at 909-525-7078 or david.brunzell@yahoo.com. Correspondence can also be sent to BCR Consulting LLC, Attn: David Brunzell, 1420 Guadalajara Place, Claremont, California 91711. I request a response by October 20, 2016. If you require more time, please let me know. Thank you for your involvement in this process. Sincerely, BCR Consulting LLC David Brunzell, M.A./RPA Principal Investigator/Archaeologist Attachment: USGS Map BC RCONSULTING LLC ARCHAEOLOGY HISTORIC PRESERVATION PALEONTOLOGY GIS September 16, 2016 Jim McPherson Tribal Historic Preservation Officer Rincon Band of Mission Indians 1 West Tribal Road Valley Center, California 92082 www.bcrconsulting.net C"'"°°' 909.525.7078 , Subject: Tribal Scoping for the Pechanga Parkway Widening Project, Temecula, Riverside County, California Dear Jim: This is a tribal scoping letter to solicit your comments on a proposed development project at locations with which you have tribal cultural affiliation. The purpose of the tribal scoping is to ensure the protection of Native American cultural resources on which the proposed undertaking may have an impact. In the tribal scoping process, early communication is encouraged in order to provide for full and reasonable public input from Native American groups and individuals. We understand that much of the content of the communications will be confidential and will include, but not be limited to, the relationship of proposed project details to Native American Cultural Historic Properties, such as burial sites, known or unknown, architectural features and artifacts, ceremonial sites, sacred shrines, and cultural landscapes. The proposed project is located in a non -sectioned portion of Township 8 South, Range 2 West, San Bernardino Baseline and Meridian. The property is depicted on the Temecula (1975), and Pechanga (1997) California 7.5 -minute USGS topographic quadrangles, (see attached map). The lead agency is the City of Temecula. If you know of any cultural resources in the vicinity that may be of religious and/or cultural significance to your community or if you would like more information, please contact me at 909-525-7078 or david.brunzell@yahoo.com. Correspondence can also be sent to BCR Consulting LLC, Attn: David Brunzell, 1420 Guadalajara Place, Claremont, California 91711. I request a response by October 20, 2016. If you require more time, please let me know. Thank you for your involvement in this process. Sincerely, BCR Consulting LLC David Brunzell, M.A./RPA Principal Investigator/Archaeologist Attachment: USGS Map BCRCONSULI ING LLC ARCHAEOLOGY HISTORIC PRESERVATION PALEONTOLOGY GIS September 16, 2016 Paul Macarro Cultural Resources Manager Pechanga Band of Mission Indians P.O Box 1477 Temecula, California 92593 www.bcrconsulting.net Cv'°'"°"' 909.525.7078 TT ,p, Subject: Tribal Scoping for the Pechanga Parkway Widening Project, Temecula, Riverside County, California Dear Paul: This is a tribal scoping letter to solicit your comments on a proposed development project at locations with which you have tribal cultural affiliation. The purpose of the tribal scoping is to ensure the protection of Native American cultural resources on which the proposed undertaking may have an impact. In the tribal scoping process, early communication is encouraged in order to provide for full and reasonable public input from Native American groups and individuals. We understand that much of the content of the communications will be confidential and will include, but not be limited to, the relationship of proposed project details to Native American Cultural Historic Properties, such as burial sites, known or unknown, architectural features and artifacts, ceremonial sites, sacred shrines, and cultural landscapes. The proposed project is located in a non -sectioned portion of Township 8 South, Range 2 West, San Bernardino Baseline and Meridian. The property is depicted on the Temecula (1975), and Pechanga (1997) California 7.5 -minute USGS topographic quadrangles, (see attached map). The lead agency is the City of Temecula. If you know of any cultural resources in the vicinity that may be of religious and/or cultural significance to your community or if you would like more information, please contact me at 909-525-7078 or david.brunzell@yahoo.com. Correspondence can also be sent to BCR Consulting LLC, Attn: David Brunzell, 1420 Guadalajara Place, Claremont, California 91711. I request a response by October 20, 2016. If you require more time, please let me know. Thank you for your involvement in this process. Sincerely, BCR Consulting LLC David Brunzell, M.A./RPA Principal Investigator/Archaeologist Attachment: USGS Map www.bcrconsulting.net c'are^ont BC RCON SU LTI NG LLC ARCHAEOLOGY HISTORIC PRESERVATION PALEONTOLOGY GIS 909.525.7078 rehathap September 16, 2016 Tribal Council San Luis Rey Band of Mission Indians 1889 Sunset Drive Vista, California 92081 Subject: Tribal Scoping for the Pechanga Parkway Widening Project, Temecula, Riverside County, California Dear Tribal Council: This is a tribal scoping letter to solicit your comments on a proposed development project at locations with which you have tribal cultural affiliation. The purpose of the tribal scoping is to ensure the protection of Native American cultural resources on which the proposed undertaking may have an impact. In the tribal scoping process, early communication is encouraged in order to provide for full and reasonable public input from Native American groups and individuals. We understand that much of the content of the communications will be confidential and will include, but not be limited to, the relationship of proposed project details to Native American Cultural Historic Properties, such as burial sites, known or unknown, architectural features and artifacts, ceremonial sites, sacred shrines, and cultural landscapes. The proposed project is located in a non -sectioned portion of Township 8 South, Range 2 West, San Bernardino Baseline and Meridian. The property is depicted on the Temecula (1975), and Pechanga (1997) California 7.5 -minute USGS topographic quadrangles, (see attached map). The lead agency is the City of Temecula. If you know of any cultural resources in the vicinity that may be of religious and/or cultural significance to your community or if you would like more information, please contact me at 909-525-7078 or david.brunzell@yahoo.com. Correspondence can also be sent to BCR Consulting LLC, Attn: David Brunzell, 1420 Guadalajara Place, Claremont, California 91711. request a response by October 20, 2016. If you require more time, please let me know. Thank you for your involvement in this process. Sincerely, BCR Consulting LLC David Brunzell, M.A./RPA Principal Investigator/Archaeologist Attachment: USGS Map BCRCONSULTING LLC ARCHAEOLOGY HISTORIC PRESERVATION PALEONTOLOGY GIS September 16, 2016 Anna Hoover Cultural Analyst Pechanga Cultural Resources Department P.O. Box 2183 Temecula, California 92593 www.bcrconsulting.net c"'a" 909.525.7078 TanaC,aD4 Subject: Tribal Scoping for the Pechanga Parkway Widening Project, Temecula, Riverside County, California Dear Anna: This is a tribal scoping letter to solicit your comments on a proposed development project at locations with which you have tribal cultural affiliation. The purpose of the tribal scoping is to ensure the protection of Native American cultural resources on which the proposed undertaking may have an impact. In the tribal scoping process, early communication is encouraged in order to provide for full and reasonable public input from Native American groups and individuals. We understand that much of the content of the communications will be confidential and will include, but not be limited to, the relationship of proposed project details to Native American Cultural Historic Properties, such as burial sites, known or unknown, architectural features and artifacts, ceremonial sites, sacred shrines, and cultural landscapes. The proposed project is located in a non -sectioned portion of Township 8 South, Range 2 West, San Bernardino Baseline and Meridian. The property is depicted on the Temecula (1975), and Pechanga (1997) California 7.5 -minute USGS topographic quadrangles, (see attached map). The lead agency is the City of Temecula. If you know of any cultural resources in the vicinity that may be of religious and/or cultural significance to your community or if you would like more information, please contact me at 909-525-7078 or david.brunzell@yahoo.com. Correspondence can also be sent to BCR Consulting LLC, Attn: David Brunzell, 1420 Guadalajara Place, Claremont, California 91711. I request a response by October 20, 2016. If you require more time, please let me know. Thank you for your involvement in this process. Sincerely, BCR Consulting LLC David Brunzell, M.A./RPA Principal Investigator/Archaeologist Attachment: USGS Map BCRCONSULI ING LLC ARCHAEOLOGY HISTORIC PRESERVATION PALEONTOLOGY GIS September 16, 2016 Allen E. Lawson Chairperson San Pasqua) Band of Mission Indians P.O. Box 365 Valley Center, California 92082 www.bcrconsulting.net c"'e"°"' 909.525.7078 TMichap, Subject: Tribal Scoping for the Pechanga Parkway Widening Project, Temecula, Riverside County, California Dear Mr. Chairperson: This is a tribal scoping letter to solicit your comments on a proposed development project at locations with which you have tribal cultural affiliation. The purpose of the tribal scoping is to ensure the protection of Native American cultural resources on which the proposed undertaking may have an impact. In the tribal scoping process, early communication is encouraged in order to provide for full and reasonable public input from Native American groups and individuals. We understand that much of the content of the communications will be confidential and will include, but not be limited to, the relationship of proposed project details to Native American Cultural Historic Properties, such as burial sites, known or unknown, architectural features and artifacts, ceremonial sites, sacred shrines, and cultural landscapes. The proposed project is located in a non -sectioned portion of Township 8 South, Range 2 West, San Bernardino Baseline and Meridian. The property is depicted on the Temecula (1975), and Pechanga (1997) California 7.5 -minute USGS topographic quadrangles, (see attached map). The lead agency is the City of Temecula. If you know of any cultural resources in the vicinity that may be of religious and/or cultural significance to your community or if you would like more information, please contact me at 909-525-7078 or david.brunzell@yahoo.com. Correspondence can also be sent to BCR Consulting LLC, Attn: David Brunzell, 1420 Guadalajara Place, Claremont, California 91711. I request a response by October 20, 2016. If you require more time, please let me know. Thank you for your involvement in this process. Sincerely, BCR Consulting LLC David Brunzell, M.A./RPA Principal Investigator/Archaeologist Attachment: USGS Map BC RCONSULTING LLC ARCHAEOLOGY HISTORIC PRESERVATION PALEONTOLOGY GIS September 16, 2016 John Flores Environmental Coordinator San Pasqua) Band of Mission Indians P.O. Box 365 Valley Center, California 92082 www.bcrconsulting.net Icurmnom 909.525.7078 t.n cnam Subject: Tribal Scoping for the Pechanga Parkway Widening Project, Temecula, Riverside County, California Dear John: This is a tribal scoping letter to solicit your comments on a proposed development project at locations with which you have tribal cultural affiliation. The purpose of the tribal scoping is to ensure the protection of Native American cultural resources on which the proposed undertaking may have an impact. In the tribal scoping process, early communication is encouraged in order to provide for full and reasonable public input from Native American groups and individuals. We understand that much of the content of the communications will be confidential and will include, but not be limited to, the relationship of proposed project details to Native American Cultural Historic Properties, such as burial sites, known or unknown, architectural features and artifacts, ceremonial sites, sacred shrines, and cultural landscapes. The proposed project is located in a non -sectioned portion of Township 8 South, Range 2 West, San Bernardino Baseline and Meridian. The property is depicted on the Temecula (1975), and Pechanga (1997) California 7.5 -minute USGS topographic quadrangles, (see attached map). The lead agency is the City of Temecula. If you know of any cultural resources in the vicinity that may be of religious and/or cultural significance to your community or if you would like more information, please contact me at 909-525-7078 or david.brunzell@yahoo.com. Correspondence can also be sent to BCR Consulting LLC, Attn: David Brunzell, 1420 Guadalajara Place, Claremont, California 91711. I request a response by October 20, 2016. If you require more time, please let me know. Thank you for your involvement in this process. Sincerely, BCR Consulting LLC David Brunzell, M.A./RPA Principal Investigator/Archaeologist Attachment: USGS Map BC RCONSULTING LLC ARCHAEOLOGY HISTORIC PRESERVATION PALEONTOLOGY GIS www.bcrconsutting.net Claremont 909.525.7078 a. September 16, 2016 Robert J. Welch Chairperson Viejas Band of Kumeyaay Indians 1 Viejas Grade Road Alpine, California 91901 Subject: Tribal Scoping for the Pechanga Parkway Widening Project, Temecula, Riverside County, California Dear Mr. Chairperson: This is a tribal scoping letter to solicit your comments on a proposed development project at locations with which you have tribal cultural affiliation. The purpose of the tribal scoping is to ensure the protection of Native American cultural resources on which the proposed undertaking may have an impact. In the tribal scoping process, early communication is encouraged in order to provide for full and reasonable public input from Native American groups and individuals. We understand that much of the content of the communications will be confidential and will include, but not be limited to, the relationship of proposed project details to Native American Cultural Historic Properties, such as burial sites, known or unknown, architectural features and artifacts, ceremonial sites, sacred shrines, and cultural landscapes. The proposed project is located in a non -sectioned portion of Township 8 South, Range 2 West, San Bernardino Baseline and Meridian. The property is depicted on the Temecula (1975), and Pechanga (1997) California 7.5 -minute USGS topographic quadrangles, (see attached map). The lead agency is the City of Temecula. If you know of any cultural resources in the vicinity that may be of religious and/or cultural significance to your community or if you would like more information, please contact me at 909-525-7078 or david.brunzell@yahoo.com. Correspondence can also be sent to BCR Consulting LLC, Attn: David Brunzell, 1420 Guadalajara Place, Claremont, California 91711. I request a response by October 20, 2016. If you require more time, please let me know. Thank you for your involvement in this process. Sincerely, BCR Consulting LLC David Brunzell, M.A./RPA Principal Investigator/Archaeologist Attachment: USGS Map BCRCONSULTING LLC ARCHAEOLOGY HISTORIC PRESERVATION PALEONTOLOGY GIS www.bcrconsufting.net Ca,n°"' 909.525.7078?ee,"'P.a„. September 16, 2016 Joseph Ontiveros Cultural Resources Department Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians P.O. Box 487 San Jacinto, California 92581 Subject: Tribal Scoping for the Pechanga Parkway Widening Project, Temecula, Riverside County, California Dear Joseph: This is a tribal scoping letter to solicit your comments on a proposed development project at locations with which you have tribal cultural affiliation. The purpose of the tribal scoping is to ensure the protection of Native American cultural resources on which the proposed undertaking may have an impact. In the tribal scoping process, early communication is encouraged in order to provide for full and reasonable public input from Native American groups and individuals. We understand that much of the content of the communications will be confidential and will include, but not be limited to, the relationship of proposed project details to Native American Cultural Historic Properties, such as burial sites, known or unknown, architectural features and artifacts, ceremonial sites, sacred shrines, and cultural landscapes. The proposed project is located in a non -sectioned portion of Township 8 South, Range 2 West, San Bernardino Baseline and Meridian. The property is depicted on the Temecula (1975), and Pechanga (1997) California 7.5 -minute USGS topographic quadrangles, (see attached map). The lead agency is the City of Temecula. If you know of any cultural resources in the vicinity that may be of religious and/or cultural significance to your community or if you would like more information, please contact me at 909-525-7078 or david.brunzell@yahoo.com. Correspondence can also be sent to BCR Consulting LLC, Attn: David Brunzell, 1420 Guadalajara Place, Claremont, California 91711. I request a response by October 20, 2016. If you require more time, please let me know. Thank you for your involvement in this process. Sincerely, BCR Consulting LLC David Brunzell, M.A./RPA Principal Investigator/Archaeologist Attachment: USGS Map www.bcrconsufting.net c'"°"'°"' BCRCONSULTING LLC ARCHAEOLOGY HISTORIC PRESERVATION PALEONTOLOGY GIS 909525.7078"c ,o, September 16, 2016 Julie Hagen Viejas Band of Kumeyaay Indians 1 Viejas Grade Road Alpine, California 91901 Subject: Tribal Scoping for the Pechanga Parkway Widening Project, Temecula, Riverside County, California Dear Julie: This is a tribal scoping letter to solicit your comments on a proposed development project at locations with which you have tribal cultural affiliation. The purpose of the tribal scoping is to ensure the protection of Native American cultural resources on which the proposed undertaking may have an impact. In the tribal scoping process, early communication is encouraged in order to provide for full and reasonable public input from Native American groups and individuals. We understand that much of the content of the communications will be confidential and will include, but not be limited to, the relationship of proposed project details to Native American Cultural Historic Properties, such as burial sites, known or unknown, architectural features and artifacts, ceremonial sites, sacred shrines, and cultural landscapes. The proposed project is located in a non -sectioned portion of Township 8 South, Range 2 West, San Bernardino Baseline and Meridian. The property is depicted on the Temecula (1975), and Pechanga (1997) California 7.5 -minute USGS topographic quadrangles, (see attached map). The lead agency is the City of Temecula. If you know of any cultural resources in the vicinity that may be of religious and/or cultural significance to your community or if you would like more information, please contact me at 909-525-7078 or david.brunzell@yahoo.com. Correspondence can also be sent to BCR Consulting LLC, Attn: David Brunzell, 1420 Guadalajara Place, Claremont, California 91711. I request a response by October 20, 2016. If you require more time, please let me know. Thank you for your involvement in this process. Sincerely, BCR Consulting LLC David Brunzell, M.A./RPA Principal Investigator/Archaeologist Attachment: USGS Map www. bcrconsulting.net cm,em°M BC RCO N S U LTI N G LLC ARCHAEOLOGY HISTORIC PRESERVATION PALEONTOLOGY GIS909.525.7078 TNalla ehachap. September 16, 2016 Carrie Garcia Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians Cultural Resources Manager P.O. Box 487 San Jacinto, California 92581 Subject: Tribal Scoping for the Pechanga Parkway Widening Project, Temecula, Riverside County, California Dear Carrie: This is a tribal scoping letter to solicit your comments on a proposed development project at locations with which you have tribal cultural affiliation. The purpose of the tribal scoping is to ensure the protection of Native American cultural resources on which the proposed undertaking may have an impact. In the tribal scoping process, early communication is encouraged in order to provide for full and reasonable public input from Native American groups and individuals. We understand that much of the content of the communications will be confidential and will include, but not be limited to, the relationship of proposed project details to Native American Cultural Historic Properties, such as burial sites, known or unknown, architectural features and artifacts, ceremonial sites, sacred shrines, and cultural landscapes. The proposed project is located in a non -sectioned portion of Township 8 South, Range 2 West, San Bernardino Baseline and Meridian. The property is depicted on the Temecula (1975), and Pechanga (1997) California 7.5 -minute USGS topographic quadrangles, (see attached map). The lead agency is the City of Temecula. If you know of any cultural resources in the vicinity that may be of religious and/or cultural significance to your community or if you would like more information, please contact me at 909-525-7078 or david.brunzell@yahoo.com. Correspondence can also be sent to BCR Consulting LLC, Attn: David Brunzell, 1420 Guadalajara Place, Claremont, California 91711. I request a response by October 20, 2016. If you require more time, please let me know. Thank you for your involvement in this process. Sincerely, BCR Consulting LLC David Brunzell, M.A./RPA Principal Investigator/Archaeologist Attachment: USGS Map www.bcrconsulting.net c"`°'"°"' BCRCONSULTING LLC ARCHAEOLOGY HISTORIC PRESERVATION PALEONTOLOGY GIS 909.525.7078 T nap, September 16, 2016 Cody J. Martinez Chairperson Sycuan Band of the Kumeyaay Nation 1 Kwaaypaay Court El Cajon, California 92019 Subject: Tribal Scoping for the Pechanga Parkway Widening Project, Temecula, Riverside County, California Dear Mr. Chairperson: This is a tribal scoping letter to solicit your comments on a proposed development project at locations with which you have tribal cultural affiliation. The purpose of the tribal scoping is to ensure the protection of Native American cultural resources on which the proposed undertaking may have an impact. In the tribal scoping process, early communication is encouraged in order to provide for full and reasonable public input from Native American groups and individuals. We understand that much of the content of the communications will be confidential and will include, but not be limited to, the relationship of proposed project details to Native American Cultural Historic Properties, such as burial sites, known or unknown, architectural features and artifacts, ceremonial sites, sacred shrines, and cultural landscapes. The proposed project is located in a non -sectioned portion of Township 8 South, Range 2 West, San Bernardino Baseline and Meridian. The property is depicted on the Temecula (1975), and Pechanga (1997) California 7.5 -minute USGS topographic quadrangles, (see attached map). The lead agency is the City of Temecula. If you know of any cultural resources in the vicinity that may be of religious and/or cultural significance to your community or if you would like more information, please contact me at 909-525-7078 or david.brunzell@yahoo.com. Correspondence can also be sent to BCR Consulting LLC, Attn: David Brunzell, 1420 Guadalajara Place, Claremont, California 91711. I request a response by October 20, 2016. If you require more time, please let me know. Thank you for your involvement in this process. Sincerely, BCR Consulting LLC David Brunzell, M.A./RPA Principal Investigator/Archaeologist Attachment: USGS Map www.bcrconsulting.net CWremont BC RCON S U LTI NG LLC ARCHAEOLOGY HISTORIC PRESERVATION PALEONTOLOGY GIS 909.525.7078 N v, September 16, 2016 Lisa Haws Cultural Resources Manager Sycuan Band of the Kumeyaay Nation 1 Kwaaypaay Court El Cajon, California 92019 Subject: Tribal Scoping for the Pechanga Parkway Widening Project, Temecula, Riverside County, California Dear Lisa: This is a tribal scoping letter to solicit your comments on a proposed development project at locations with which you have tribal cultural affiliation. The purpose of the tribal scoping is to ensure the protection of Native American cultural resources on which the proposed undertaking may have an impact. In the tribal scoping process, early communication is encouraged in order to provide for full and reasonable public input from Native American groups and individuals. We understand that much of the content of the communications will be confidential and will include, but not be limited to, the relationship of proposed project details to Native American Cultural Historic Properties, such as burial sites, known or unknown, architectural features and artifacts, ceremonial sites, sacred shrines, and cultural landscapes. The proposed project is located in a non -sectioned portion of Township 8 South, Range 2 West, San Bernardino Baseline and Meridian. The property is depicted on the Temecula (1975), and Pechanga (1997) California 7.5 -minute USGS topographic quadrangles, (see attached map). The lead agency is the City of Temecula. If you know of any cultural resources in the vicinity that may be of religious and/or cultural significance to your community or if you would like more information, please contact me at 909-525-7078 or david.brunzell@yahoo.com. Correspondence can also be sent to BCR Consulting LLC, Attn: David Brunzell, 1420 Guadalajara Place, Claremont, California 91711. I request a response by October 20, 2016. If you require more time, please let me know. Thank you for your involvement in this process. Sincerely, BCR Consulting LLC David Brunzell, M.A./RPA Principal Investigator/Archaeologist Attachment: USGS Map ._a r- rU m t -q 3E0 Extra Samosa& Foos *segosb.., frprirpsW FirtsrR n Romp, herdo3P0 • cj 0 %Num Pim* imaircrily s kjL1 ComPoo ftwociamo Dollooty • L.jfl l=1 Ado Sam,. Roi‘bod • i.1:1 ci [3 Sorrows flomicord Dew, • CD Postage e•R 4 old Pewees and Fes. is tal Servi R FIED MAIL RECEIPT Domestic Mait (rJ 0•6116Mrd . SC;.11fl liereleee II Pees Oro eel les ternstrrilll Oftsup amon Imam. , CI Fir 4.011=0 (limbos'. $ plumose ma Rely • 1 Li u 1 1 CI sae %perm MmOr • V2.1;* a1/411-11,111,011 PortICO• $ fatal Positege led Nee _ P try& t es. Sem 7b 3OO A' :0 U.S. Postal Service' CERTIFIED MAILRECEIPT Domestic Mail Only For delivery information. vee' our website atwww.tiods. c Gerehee Mee Fos m IT' m rq e,‘ rq a - En Total liciebest end tar ; ..-13 Lm CI 'Strait( - 1-4 r•- Sri—art n 1-o4Nv IPOstrre,i, Here c 6 c,) Pt& le_& --"Nel 5 .. rllo•Zr 3800 Awl; 20'O • U.S. Postal Service CERTIFIED MAIL* RECEIPT 1711-101P '-rr Only •ttutatton. teed out webstre fl www.usps.com t GNAW Mil Am $ 7 30 :Extra Serviess irises Siesmasm estreirrfrsie 0$0.aknaki$10011o$10$110 a , Claw* nailiplis Postmark D°.noa kW Pkalaklallekkok • $:i , i..4717 -- Here D kaukallmluleftille• I 1: 10 1 Adult alardbal f•m6.11.• Elnimei • Pommies Sig F r.1 .18110, drprti 231:r ',II •,.. tor ItnqlfMr. trrrnsr r -r1 Lf) m r-9 0 ri- U S. - 0910 0001 fostinal bice' CEr IFI D /111.4 RECEIPT Dome tic Mad Only • ' 10 %Neb.:it " 31 1401, /sot,. C 11 01.1 Ern & tmlalsoiorroppillel 0 Illown Orsimoppi Prow r,amprosse,ses51TI I Do. new clot essmood cisme $ t _ Omar sererre. emeexil 6 1S(1 0/alult Wahine 11bolideled Oldvary • Amino iG.47 • 7.7 9911 '2O1 :4±, t 'Skiff U.S. Postal Service CERTIFIED MAIL?' RECEIPT Domestic Mail Only For delivery untormatton vt:Jut website Fit 114,61/1/1, USDS.COM Certified La &Mose Fees octeateek..81,..rIrrer.... Rolm Fluoulpi emacoPf) s Demurs PlooMpl hoctrunt) 0 08,11101 Nmanord Do.my • 12 Anal Simian 1■4111,811 • $ :,1 CA, 0*** elprolumfloilletat Ouliwry • Postaall, $047 Poseaser 7 7. gOvss* orPO it" No,‘ ; 4:1 PS Fortr, deude US.Postal Service CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT >omestIc Mail Only lPr delivery information. 'use ,),tr website a www kisps.com' 1 t: $ 3 . 30 111-1.1 Eon NSI Fs 661106kins 0666610166606 0661666* Ird921711114* Ckuma64041066660111 s U • 0 [laminator ilublowl Mom . s _ rin 44.66 611,6666 avoismorm. 1.0. maw 1110ary Oars* Pollee* Weer .1") \\,itiftY S641 r° 6 V-)44•JI1 PrL gt911 A./ PS POITTI 3800, Apr0 201 _o r-9 tt') m rR Cr" Cr r3 0 0 0 r4 0� r-1 m ra 0910 0001 9913 .A rR 111 r-7 is) m ra a 0' I Y y'. Extra 4mvio..&Fen Os* asell tYap r. I-4 ❑Rtran snop ower.oMA I p Meow essressesteemry $ $11 t ill O pnr.erereatraaae $ $I t .1.10 [pool %mom anima amp" Poems ll . Y _. Domes/a: tal Service IED MAIL RECEIPT Id tr a• Netts" J . r 4V on odeaaw.4.6.aFess MEd ala. Waft Terap ralll DRr`uettrrR Illrueet.l P.,,al tteoab+ Nlecincb1 $ 4+: OCvlare tea t;..a.ril.I V $ �iJ _LIU 1.1 ❑Asa 01/trlae1r. $ frrt.(l0t ❑ Aat � r♦aa errrlord OrmeI l Postage Total Prey. teed $ 7b .77 et a Pb Form U.S. Postal Service'" CERTIFIED MAIL' RECEIPT Domestic Mail Only '11Orrnr tlrnr. v .r 1d C. L1.11 Fee fxtrs seri... a Fess peek aea arare terpairiat °Ram taatietapt • Dnrmlr.e4tMrctlsorld $ $ t.(t�! Darrleetae.er.weDeems $ $ti.ili1 ❑ASitgertat+Realm $ 4%r_0i+ DOOM .lorretrrw.rttr.y $ Poway slid Pagano, no, $ Poatrnart Mete 4'09/16/20)o Sent Ib bar ►- P ..... AlNI. 7RUir. Aunt U.S. Postal Service"' CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT Domestic Mali Only •" • I t l Fttllf.: r 5015 For 10uvf"r• nr1OrpanOo. vIS 1011r Wt'.Clski Orr' C.srtitbd Mail F Total Fos$., oat trip -7. ..0 i N Peseree Her. Sent To e obi "Ind Arif • PS i-ur't. 34101. A(,rr;I . •,'. ,itle NfvPr4P 40 In-ti"I{. InrrsC r-1 to m ra 0- 0 ra C7 0 r -i 0• r3 0 0910 0001 9913 5161 U.S. ost Ser ice E IF D AIL'RECEIPT Domestic Mad Only -Jr deaf „,ry int r '/'1tawl iSlt o 'woe:ide°ln itttI isms __op; 3 $1-1 iiii Pick 04 ii v2r txtr$ &artiest & Fa& tlaa..$s wicolt ly j.ar Nr ...10Iaaroo010 $ Rain I $1.. li-° -.I 0tarel.rtr.aartorataloa $ VI.tlll Dawmart•lr.a.► . $I--UU Cleat agreses.411.0ast.w.«v $ 3 total Postage and .-. $ Seri To w t 3ireet -• Flo.,-• 1 'F6oir iq, . ..... - 4.. 2, 4 r'r-. Farm 3000, April 201', °-t >53a..,o.:.laoo so ' See Reverse 1o1 Instructlons U.S. Postal Service'" CERTIFIED MAIL' RECEIPT Domestic Mail Only o delivery intorrn0ulon_ �.1 out wetstlw psr e at ww.us-pon Ceeredtied Fes $7. ^I, $ 41l 1111 _ Postmark H't� _ - a',. . G Edna $111MO..8. F«it 4s, NOM* It or El Wain AMMO tnaraagA $ QBaum erri.t hl.a.aaia► . $-ii, 00 DCrtnrra.reraredasims. $ alJ 1:11,1 [Iseult 31graliai"'$l $ $1..",00 0Ala$1310trrr.twa+aaet>.u.,.ri $ klitaga #. total Postage and tees .. II -� Sent To4 ,ti Strew iii r3kiii.) PV go%rqii .N- F, ( 2 t.r .. ._.- PS PS Furm 3000. April 2011,,,,,t4 -r,:tr wn 4..1 U.S. Postal Service"" CERTIFIED MAIL' RECEIPT Domestic Mail Only F d.t"!Cr y rntot mat ,cot onr wetlsile at W Nos" los $3.30 Erne Sonless I Fe.. Pro $44, ora Ram ao*Italloaa$ 0 Paean lroap Itarwrl I ❑ CaW.d W eratlera Dawe $ ❑ Adult seers llra.a.e $1. 41.) Liu $11.00 ❑ mat etotowttiartre>aearay $ Postage $ 0 . 4 r twa4Pata.e " Sem To t A 5esif:- 7�2im -v- 0b ( 7016 0910 0001 9913 carR 0910 0001 9913 Fo nthrt on. .n out webs.i. IttiVW 7•". Cirtlfr $ - Of' ifir.4oss & Fent Ono en. one no TTPdadfodd 011onem nocalei waned — 011nom dm. domande) 00orlInd alooldelod or/ j dont dignoado denabod $ cp) Dios domerlonal Dann $ Pkware• $e,47 LI Posing awl - $ Pc-amark rere .11e -ontrafil,6 Sara 4,41 ALLC4-4,1"il tiefVf.er --WSW " V" _C) • q-1 21#4-4b- +., PS F.,113800 U.S. Postal Service CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT Domestic Mail Only L USE . • • -taints Ili1OrMIlt1011 swill Ow w.herre 4t www t4 con' NOW hid Fri $ tib ni! Ixba Undoes &Fan 801111diod Nit $ giallefflrek* 011nama domadal $81100800 °Raw* Awar Islownwha L. Corn./ dmildat Dabswy $ Osaka soma amino • MLR Aliprimi Pmts.* $0.47 Li Pawleys awl V;aga 77 0735 (lc Hos Sent -69 'Sawa and FA, aev-t--ef- C44 • n 38U0, AphZ . U.S. Postal Service' CERTIFIED MAIL" RECEIPT Domestic Mad Only Fur Otorv.-!,y mformafron, visit our wetante al www OSP' VA Y lOwilaid Fee - ti• Lift -Erna Sonnase 4 Few NAM MK, WO Poo geopiipeadim IOWA, FlosIO IhNolec01/ $ i.LrJ Ogren Ronda folmenond $ Oc.riefte moo doosiond Donny $ $0 0i) Ado Somas,' liouged 5 (, DA.* Spnoturo Rodoldiod galloon $ PO011e• D ru u1 u-1 r-9 ru Lr) m rR 0- r1 D D r -R D ru r - Er D D D r-1 D LJ ewt .0 0 =1:11= , ,4"t, .reftedM Fee Ltra Swaim $ Feel Idea* bow. •dt, API 41/1PrIF0,04 Dreoutereeeleilieeleope 3 Return F.. .mpt Opel' Ow . . GAMOW '.1aR Rsork,-.1 Delon $ AdO Spool.. Rooked 1 rici 0 Adult dootaware fiewleteeDerreiry 6 'amuse , -7 Peolmos and ern _ _ Postmer, Here o • arerb 4,144-6- 60-(11‘w 0 f144 r 0 .0I5 1.-E,N Nev. he U.S Postal Service - CERTIFIED MAIL" RECEIPT Domestic MafOM) For drilwere info, - ot or wel-isW fr • f -t L Certified Mail F.. $3.30 E**Tl SIMMS FOURIOMokiset. Wefts Trfartfrittj Ei Wei= neelpi taidonad 0 Plokoedlend dindanid $ Sti • LIt• 0 Coilind linelond Oadony $ fifl a1en/m8lanolowdeldne 8 $1 PO OIuri.jInavory ,nstass Total Powlase awl Piro 77 eor71Th .;`trast aript. No., 7,Z r USE 07r 06 • TION&P.31.? ror Instrin Otitis U.S. Postal Service CERTIFIED MAIL- RECEIPT Domestic Ma Only information visit our website at www usps coat TEn�PI FY - tc; _ tantebvisis a igassworts. ..adsuirslirsoo Elsuessimsestselossosis s - mossor $ f ouguirrommowso.r * Dads eipwwwartwonalaivery Pa11440 $0.47 Pasies• aral Itr. 77 0 P 6-ek 'ccpro AjlefkiT-1561Eiii )?C D .D ri ♦T 0 ri 0 D Ir J3 trl N J3 1-4 U' 0' 1-1 D D D r -R 1r D -c r - 7016 0910 0001 9914 6846 U AS. Postal Service' (RTiFIEO MAL"FIECUPT Dome. Plc Moil Only Cwri+ 9d Mil fee $ S . i_I 4'. ta1areaa�1 Extra Swaiaaalfrasaa aarasaat ea_r; n l " ❑w.lamammo Iltn�aU • ❑t ,ir.alaawu++rs.a+r $_ p •e,a • eaters $ '[:. [h:, ❑ malt SooraJraeettataaaq $ $0.47 total hobs* gaol !$w $ ;r Zii5.t.2i�1. SvitToGVif.,ra 1 . PS 1,61 17, 3800. Au[ai : : r �..'..-:.'.a: Ser. Ftevt. for trtstruct,uns U.S. Postal Service' CERTIFIED MAIL' RECEIPT Domestic Mail Only for ;.''very inturmattonvisit out wetisere RI warm usOs. corn°. CrtMed Nail Fos ¢. I U0 Ssrviorta 1 Fina kx.aral ia$811, ry ❑rrmnnmaartr+macata $ D 0 8.8a. 888•1118 (slasembi po.ararrnwta.raorr.y a 3; t JQ ❑ Aau a1080u8 PF$88 a $ is i ❑ Alla $111110.18 ataaakma o•A+•v • rtt$.i Paaya sal Pose. Straw and cont +-et- D Postmark Nap 76(7 f¢tii Illcm rim 3800. KUM 20'. : Sea Rxusrr9tr for Instruction-, U.S. Postal Service" CERTIFIED MAIL"' RECEIPT Domestic Mail Only leilve, intorfrt.litr,,! ' 0i nun vo.okl8rte .•fl ww Golfed MA Rea $3,30 $ 3't_litl Ube Swim 1Fess lima Aat, rid Is. ops. t> ❑Ilelom,mipefue P • Ocaa;wMal flue rrao++r • 311.120 DAtr Swam Ntsieaa $ $1'-.1:11J DAMS uwl+.lratmt taawy $ $11.; LI Postage ostae 77 saraatt. f PO Ps i cee, 3800. Apnl ?q1 .- 1 t � ! J . Postmark tins r-1 m Lt) 7016 0910 0001 9914 ,U.S. ost i Se ICEtTIF D Domestic Malt Only EIP t•or rteityery url rrnahot,ry !'aAakaaMall Fee ,r,;r.„ri! taraLa mat Dais= P•ao•••or•xa4 • MCersm.o%OK -a DM.fy • $ ❑Aaa ower.. Aapnaa • t . , Or O Aaiatw.aae itrray $ Pottml Hera rtf Toac4� '( §aueQ W,Q 1 P51 -arm U.S. Postal Service CERTIFIED MAIL' RECEIPT Domestic Mart Only .10f I!I9tf11C110n9 Fear delivery information. visit our website at www usps conn L CE ' } •xtrr7eaai.ea 1 Faea trarlaan Aad 0nom w08111•ywM • O1W.tY080110aaaa» $ f a 4•i 08$110118$111•010ler..r • ❑MAilstrretlmotr • $ l.1 , go DIMES $ Parlor $0.47 6.77 Postmark Nets • R*wPt se 1,), intiiflN-11nli U.S. Postal Service" CERTIFIED MAIL' RECEIPT Domestic M.311 �7niy Flr+ +$€ $IvW_I 1ntrlrn1.111 ALF :oat can Website al I4'1Y'w.ltslls cam Oar9nlil Ms$Pas $3.30 p¢ Tetra Survisaa i Foes lotrekaacoaf toe Tri ars." Owa 18100081 •raro•3 $ O* .nwwenHr.rankS $ — 0ot1111.a81te881111ttaa$aermlr $ ❑ oast $/amlelr.alatae ee1r., $ NOW $I:i, 7or1 Rrrgr Ptd • Postmark Fors +rs;'TYVs 7016 0910 0001 9914 6877 0 0 0 g-4 N tr -0 r -R 0 S. P stal ery e ER IFI MRIL' AEC IPT1 Domestrc Mail Only Can 'led !awl ,a $ IQ C; ratra Services & Fos mow* tam ads tam ladair. 0 ROW, 6.00-41 6.1060;r0 6 0 :Soon Rem leiscouse) $ 7_! , Rearadaa Samy $ MAWR Signesse 6•10666 :I Das* Dam $ Powwow $1. LI Pommes and F,100 )strnat$ Here gq/1 20L aara To City, St 2)04.4'... -- laUC. Aprvi No tat . OY•13-1toen5S__ • ...... . . ........... U.S. Postal Service CERTIFIED MAILRECEIPT Domestic Mail OM, For riol;very information. visit our website at wwwut;oF terktilso tt Feb 1:1 La Fees foam* aax, ads No as aforafflatei &Ewa %GNP awake* - Inflatea Rea** Opiumamio $ 13Cartaisa Ramaiassi Delivery $ hous Siandiaa Remtrat s: OA*" $$$INIna Miterieted Li Issesese . 77 , Postioatir 6-4M0P3 rs Seri To ft C. Street rat- Mi P4 da..,NA.0 (-A. 0,11. OP 101 U.S. Postal Service " CERTIFIED MAIL: RECEIPT Domestw nth Only ror 01):11010 WPOSlif11 1111'W tiSys COP, A 06111161 Mid ris $3,30 VI Co IlisralanKFre wart am age tam arrippreg 0 PAMIR Mmelpilualsoni • •'•"2 ftunal•IP wow* $ „ t Duro ors assoosess... . 1 oct Asitikgmles•lbusimell DMA Iliviii•eireakimtpaeiry Postage $0. 4 7 Total Poatega wad .thes 1'1 3C1/4- FkI)*kiV S Said 76/ or PC goa-No "4 -- PS P1 irtffirr 411 ."1" 7016 0910 0001 7016 0910 0001 9914 6891 ll& Postal Set vicc. "CITIFIED MAIL' RECEIPT Dom tic MlI O'hy .Fn., ft . a ta visit o webs , • Iv a Fae ,,, i . , -' _,... !1,,:, , - -Paellotirk Hera . _ .'',' .Z.•.11 : mac ke .. , ,. •i 0 11 • D ,. „ Do-nte*, Aall Fisetre,. xi Nowa $ t i ..2.21...._ Adul *purses Reamed I .0 0 Mutt Spealve Rederistee Cielieery a P _ L. Send r. andA11. fi" 72u.„) 4 61 1..• Ai . imi, 1.. Sec Reverse tur tnstructions U.S. Postal Service' CERTIFIED MAIL'' RECEIPT Domestic Mail Only Fr deltvory onormaloan ta.,0 stir wahala,a at www uSps corn Cortifted OMAN* $ tr. an Cit Poems* ExtrallarrierstantwOossuhaLwttaatrm/or 0 .**** • 0 RialwaReadlat Iplidaiwil* 6 '4,-ri .1-irl Eiossirnotiresimillairetv 6 i_ -..11:1 s, friim .. .....7-; i•-..... 7...., . '"1•19,1 l„.116 0 Ad6111166 $ 0 AddlasneleseilialleftiONSVO$ 1 Postage IS Sent 773,- (..,c 4.4-4-AICZ-- Skeet tiviAiit'Afc., orZox he le -1,..t y, 0-0ots /-.4--- . y C- twilpw, . Cf241 tt OCTOBER 19, 2016 BCR CONSULTING LLC CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT PECHAGA PARKWAY WIDENING PROJECT APPENDIX B PHOTOGRAPHS OCTOBER 19, 2016 BCR CONSULTING LLC CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT PECHAGA PARKWAY WIDENING PROJECT Photo 1: Project Site Overview (View east) Photo 2: Project Site Overview Towards Vacant Lot (View North) OCTOBER 19, 2016 BCR CONSULTING LLC CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT PECHAGA PARKWAY WIDENING PROJECT APPENDIX C PALEONTOLOGICAL SENSITIVITY MAP L08 COUNTY COUNTY Riverside County Paleontological Sensitivity Map High A (Ha) High B (Hb) Low U n date rm i need Highways Mao Waterbod les Oecembar 16, 2013 M i toa O 10 20 Oisolnirns, Wisps set. Ont. ars to Os unsaid for rsfarinnos our...wain only. Nino fnisturns =rm. .c�'y of FlissrsiOn rniathss won -ants or siswarnntwit mai to this cont.,. o+Ohm ti .p o..o .00ur r ., P oi.ion .non Os the.nolo.e.ponsihil r f'W. CM... en.. a, a.,o. with City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening Appendix D: Geotechnical Investigation December 2016 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration GEOCON W ES T.1 N C. GEDTECHNICAL ■ ENVIRONMENTAL ■ MATERIALS Project No. T2733-22-01 October 12, 2016 Francisco Martinez Jr., P.E. Michael Baker International 40810 County Center Drive, Suite 200 Temecula, California 92590 Subject: GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION PECHANGA PARKWAY WIDENING VIA GILBERTO TO NORTH CASINO DRIVE CITY PROJECT PW 15-14 TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA Dear Mr. Martinez: In accordance with Proposal 1E-1607 dated February 24, 2016 and the Subconsultant Agreement for Professional Services, Geocon West, Inc. (Geocon) has prepared this report of our geotechnical investigation along Pechanga Parkway from Via Gilberto to North Casino Drive, in Temecula, California. The approximate limits of the project are depicted on the attached Vicinity Map (see Figure 1). This report presents a summary of the methods used to observe the subsurface geologic conditions, measurements of the existing pavement section thicknesses, results of the laboratory testing, and recommendations for design and construction of the roadway widening. Geocon performed geotechnical observation and testing for the City of Temecula during improvements to Pechanga Parkway in 2008 and 2009. As part of this project, we have reviewed our construction records and used that information in evaluation of the currently proposed construction. PROJECT UNDERSTANDING The Pechanga Parkway widening will include improvements to the roadways along Pechanga Parkway between Via Gilberto and North Casino Drive. The extent of the improvements will begin approximately 600 feet southeast of Via Gilberto at Station 86+99 and extend to approximately 600 feet southeast of North Casino Drive at Station 115+36. Pechanga Parkway runs in a northwest/southeast orientation. In the area of the proposed improvements, the roadway consists of two travel lanes and a bike lane in each direction, with a center median. Based on the plans by Michael Baker International, we understand that the planned construction will include widening of the roadway to the northeast, a reduction in median width, and shifting of the medians to accommodate a third lane of traffic in each direction. The improvements will include grading along the northeast side of Pechanga Parkway, relocation of utilities, additional storm drain structures, new lighting, new medians, relocation of a bus pad, construction of a retaining wall, new 41571 Corning Place, Suite 101 • Murrieto, California 92562-7065 • Telephone 951.304.2300 • Fax 951.304.2392 curb and gutter, sidewalk, and irrigation. Portions of the roadway will be milled and overlaid, and areas of widened pavement will receive a new structural section. Grading will include modifying the channel slopes along the northeast side of the roadway. The existing channel slopes along the length of the proposed improvements are approximately 6 to 10 feet in height below the existing roadway. The slopes are inclined at approximately 4:1 to 5:1 (horizontal:vertical). The slopes are separated from the existing paved roadway by a sidewalk and narrow landscaped area. The proposed alterations include steepening some of the slopes to 2:1 (h:v) in order to provide additional area for the roadway widening. The new fill will daylight within the approximate midpoint of the existing slopes. The new slopes will generally be up to 6 feet high with one section northwest of Wolf Valley Road up to 10 feet high. The toe of the new slope will extend to the bottom of the existing channel slope (See Figure 2). A 6 -foot -high retaining wall will be constructed within the existing slope southeast of Wolf Valley Road to provide room for a bus turnout. The recommendations presented herein are based on analysis of the data obtained during the investigation, our work during widening of the roadway in 2008 to 2009, and our experience with similar soil and geologic conditions. If project details vary significantly from those described herein, Geocon should be contacted to determine the necessity for review and possible revision of this report. SCOPE OF SERVICES The purpose of the investigation was to advance borings along the northeast shoulder to observe the subsurface geologic conditions, core the existing pavement sections to measure base and asphalt concrete thicknesses, sample the exposed subgrade soil, perform R -value testing of subgrade soil, evaluate the existing and planned pavement sections based on information obtained during our investigation, and recommend pavement sections for new asphalt concrete roadways and improvement of the existing pavement. Our scope of services included the following: • Mark the proposed core locations and notify Underground Service Alert (USA) to locate and mark utilities in the proposed investigation area. • Obtain an encroachment permit from the City of Temecula. • Advance three borings along the northeast side of the roadway. The borings were performed to observe surficial geologic conditions and to collect samples for laboratory testing and analyses. • Excavate six pavement cores in the roadways. The existing asphalt concrete pavement and aggregate base thicknesses were measured and bulk samples were collected from the base and subgrade. • Perform laboratory testing of the surficial soil, including R -value, direct shear, consolidation, moisture content, and in-place density. • Prepare this written report presenting our findings, conclusions and recommendations. Geocon Project No. T2733-22-01 - 2 - October 12, 2016 EXISTING CONDITIONS Based on our work during widening of the roadway in 2008 to 2009, our records indicate that the existing roadway consists of approximately 61/2 inches of asphalt concrete over approximately 12 to 17 inches of aggregate base (along both sides of the roadway). During one phase of the roadway construction, the subgrade soils required use of geogrid beneath the pavement section due to poor subgrade conditions encountered during construction. The northeastern side of the roadway consists of various generations of pavement with older pavement being overlaid in the No. 1 lane. Laboratory test results during the 2008 and 2009 roadway construction indicated that the subgrade between Sta 87+00 and 103+00 had an R -value of 64, and we recommended a pavement structural section of 6.5 inches of asphalt concrete over 12 inches of aggregate base. Between Sta 103+00 and 115+00, the subgrade had an R -value of 20, and we recommended a pavement structural section of 6.5 inches of asphalt concrete over 17.5 inches of aggregate base. During our site reconnaissance and field exploration on August 31 and September 1, 2016, the existing pavement did not exhibit signs of severe distress within the area of the proposed roadway improvements. FIELD EXPLORATION AND LABORATORY TESTING The northeastern shoulder of the roadway was explored on August 31, 2016 by excavating three 8 -inch diameter borings utilizing a truck -mounted hollow -stem auger drilling machine. The borings were excavated to a depth of approximately 161/2 feet below the existing ground surface in areas of the planned grading along the existing slopes and in the area of the proposed retaining wall. The approximate locations of the exploratory borings are depicted on the Boring Location Map (see Figure 2A). Coring of the roadway was performed on August 31 and September 1, 2016. Cores were taken from the northeastern side of the roadway in both lanes and in the shoulder. The approximate core locations are shown on the Boring Location Plan (see Figures 2A and 2B). The core samples were obtained using either a 6 -inch diameter diamond core barrel, or a truck -mounted hollow -stem auger drilling machine. The cores were drilled through the asphalt concrete, and the exploration was extended through the aggregate base layer and into the subgrade. Measurements of the cores and aggregate base layers were taken in the field, and samples of the subgrade and base were collected. The cores, subgrade and base samples were transported to our geotechnical laboratory for analysis, and the core holes were filled to existing subgrade level and capped with asphalt concrete patch. Measurements of the core thicknesses are provided on Table 1 on the following page. No groundwater or saturated soils were encountered within the explorations for this project. The borings indicate that the northeastern shoulder consists of 7 to 9 feet of fill over younger alluvial deposits at the locations explored. The fill generally consists of loose to medium dense silty sand, and Geocon Project No. T2733-22-01 - 3 - October 12, 2016 firm to stiff sandy silt. The underlying younger alluvium consists of loose to medium dense sand with varying amounts of silt, and firm to stiff sandy silt. The roadway cores indicate that the subsurface conditions along the north side of Pechanga Parkway consist of 61/2 to 9 inches of asphalt concrete over 11 to 17 inches of aggregate base, over a subgrade consisting of silty sand with varying amounts of gravel. A detailed discussion of the field investigation, including boring logs, is presented in Appendix A. Laboratory tests were performed on selected soil samples obtained during the investigation. Appendix B presents a summary of the laboratory test results. TABLE 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS Pechanga Parkway Lane (,ore Measured Asphalt Concrete Thickness (in) Measured Aggregate Base Thickness (in) Subgrade USCS Classification Left Lane C-1 7.0 11.0 Silty Sand trace Gravel (SM) Right Lane (' 2 7.0 11.0 Silty Sand trace Gravel (SM) Left Lane C- 9.0 11.5 Silty Sand trace Gravel (SM) Right Lane C-4 6.5 17.0 Silty Sand trace Gravel (SM) Right Shoulder C-5 7.0 17.0 Silty Sand trace Gravel (SM) Right Shoulder C-6 7.0 17.0 Silty Sand with Gravel (SM) Testing of subgrade samples collected along Pechanga Parkway yielded R -value test results of 32, 44, and 50. The R -value test results are presented in Appendix B. Geocon Project No. T2733-22-01 - 4 - October 12, 2016 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS It is our opinion that soil or geologic conditions were not encountered during the investigation that would preclude the construction of the proposed Pechanga Parkway widening and associated improvements provided the recommendations presented herein are followed and implemented during construction. Based on the asphalt concrete cores, the aggregate base thicknesses, and the subgrade soil conditions observed during our exploration, it is our opinion that the roadways were constructed to the pavement section thicknesses recommended in 2008 and 2009. At that time, Pechanga Parkway was classified as a Major Arterial with a Traffic Index of 10. Some of the roadway improvements constructed during 2008 and 2009 encountered wet or soft subgrade conditions, and a geogrid was used to stabilize the subgrade before placing aggregate base. Similar subgrade conditions may be encountered during construction of the currently proposed pavement widening. If necessary, recommendations for stabilization of the subgrade will be provided by Geocon during construction. New Pavements — Preliminary Pavement Recommendations New pavements should be constructed to meet the current minimum structural section thicknesses in the City's Standard Plan Numbers 113 and 115. Based on the roadway width and the planned number of lanes, we anticipate that the roadway will be classified as a Major Arterial with a Traffic Index of 10 or a Principal Arterial with a Traffic Index of 12. The following preliminary pavement sections in Table 2 are recommended along Pechanga Parkway where new pavements are planned. The pavement sections were evaluated using an R -value of 32. Final pavement sections should be evaluated based on R -value testing of the soils encountered at the pavement subgrade during construction. Pavement thicknesses were determined following procedures outlined in the referenced Caltrans Highway Design Manual. We used a Traffic Index of 10 and 12 per the City of Temecula Pavement Design Requirements, Standard Plan No. 115. The project civil engineer should select the appropriate Traffic Index for the roadway. Geocon should be contacted for additional recommendations if other Traffic Indices apply. Geocon Project No. T2733-22-01 - 5 - October 12, 2016 TABLE 2 RECOMMENDED PAVEMENT DESIGN SECTIONS Roadway Classification Estimated Traffic Index (TI) Subgrade R -Value Asphalt Concrete (inches) Class 2 Aggregate Base (inches) Major Arterial 10 32 6.5 14 Principal Arterial 12 32 6.5 19 Asphalt concrete should conform to Section 203-6 of the Greenbook. Class 2 aggregate base materials should conform to Section 26-1.02A of the "Standard Specifications of the State of California, Department of Transportation" (Caltrans). If used, Crushed Aggregate Base (CAB) and Crushed Miscellaneous Base (CMB) should conform to Sections 200-2.2 and 200-2.4, respectively, of the Greenbook. The subgrade should be moisture conditioned to approximately 2 percent above its optimum moisture content and compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum dry density as evaluated by ASTM International (ASTM) D1557. The aggregate base material should be compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum dry density at approximately 2 percent above its optimum moisture content. Asphalt concrete should be compacted to at least 95 percent of the Hveem density as evaluated by ASTM D1561. Testing of the subgrade, base, and asphalt concrete should be performed during construction of the pavement to verify relative compaction. The performance of pavements is highly dependent upon providing positive surface drainage away from the edge of pavements. Ponding of water on or adjacent to the pavement will likely result in saturation of the subgrade materials and subsequent cracking, subsidence and pavement distress. If planters are planned adjacent to paving, consideration should be given to extending the perimeter curb at least 12 inches below the bottom of the aggregate base to minimize the introduction of water beneath the paving. Grading Grading of the northeast shoulder of Pechanga Parkway should be performed in accordance with the attached Recommended Grading Specifications and the City of Temecula Grading Ordinances. Prior to commencing grading, a preconstruction conference should be held at the site with the county inspector, owner or developer, grading contractor, civil engineer, and geotechnical engineer in attendance. Special soil handling and/or the grading plans can be discussed at that time. Site preparation should begin with the removal of deleterious material, debris and vegetation. The depth of removal should be such that material exposed in cut areas or soil to be used as fill is Geocon Project No. T2733-22-01 - 6 - October 12, 2016 relatively free of organic matter. Material generated during stripping and/or site demolition should be exported from the site. Fill in the existing slope areas northeast of Pechanga Parkway should be keyed and benched into the existing slope. The width of the key at the tow of the proposed fill slopes should be sufficiently wide to permit complete coverage with the compaction equipment used. The base of the key should be at least 2 feet deep into competent material at the toe of the new fill slope, and inclined slightly into the slope as show in the Typical Benching Detail in the attached Recommended Grading Specifications. Geocon should observe the keyway bottoms to check the exposed soil and approve the excavation in writing prior to any fill placement. Deeper excavations may be required if dry, loose, or soft soil is present at the base of the keyway. Backcut drains may be needed depending on field conditions encountered during grading. Benching should be conducted in accordance with the attached Recommended Grading Specifications. The contractor should take precautionary measures not to damage the existing improvements adjacent to the planned graded slopes. The site should be brought to finish grade elevations with fill compacted in layers. Layers of fill should be no thicker than will allow for adequate bonding and compaction. Fill, including backfill and scarified ground surfaces, should be compacted to a dry density of at least 90 percent of the laboratory maximum dry density, at approximately 2 percent above optimum moisture content, as determined by ASTM D 1557. Fill materials placed below optimum moisture content may require additional moisture conditioning prior to placing additional fill. Import fill should consist of granular materials with a "low" expansion potential (EI of 50 or less), should be less corrosive than the site soils, generally free of deleterious material and rock fragments larger than 6 inches and should be compacted as recommended herein. Geocon should be notified of the import soil source and should perform laboratory testing of import soil prior to its arrival at the site to evaluate its suitability as fill material. Fill slopes should be overbuilt at least 2 feet and cut back to the tight fill core. The slopes should be track -walked at the completion of each slope such that the fill is compacted to a dry density of at least 90 percent of the laboratory maximum dry density at approximately 2 percent above optimum moisture content to the face of the finished slope. Finished slopes should be landscaped with drought -tolerant vegetation having variable root depths and requiring minimal landscape irrigation. In addition, the slopes should be drained and properly maintained to reduce erosion. Geocon Project No. T2733-22-01 - 7 - October 12, 2016 Conventional Retaining Walls The recommendations presented herein are generally applicable to the design of rigid concrete or masonry retaining walls having a maximum height of 10 feet. In the event that walls higher than 10 feet or other types of walls are planned, Geocon should be consulted for additional recommendations. Retaining walls not restrained at the top and having a level backfill surface should be designed for an active soil pressure equivalent to the pressure exerted by a fluid density of 30 pounds per cubic foot (pcf). This soil pressures assume that the backfill materials within an area bounded by the wall and a 1:1 plane extending upward from the base of the wall possess an EI of 50 or less. For those areas where backfill materials do not conform to the criteria herein, Geocon should be consulted for additional recommendations. The structural engineer should determine the seismic design category for the project in accordance with Section 1613 of the CBC. If the project possesses a seismic design category of D, E, or F, proposed retaining walls in excess of 6 feet in height should be designed with seismic lateral pressure (Section 1803.5.12 of the 2013 CBC). A seismic load of 10 pcf should be used for design of walls that support more than 6 feet of backfill in accordance with Section 1803.5.12 of the 2013 CBC. The seismic load is applied as an equivalent fluid pressure along the height of the wall and the calculated loads result in a maximum load exerted at the base of the wall and zero at the top of the wall. This seismic load should be applied in addition to the active earth pressure. The earth pressure is based on half of two-thirds of PGAM calculated from ASCE 7-10 Section 11.8.3. Unrestrained walls will move laterally when backfilled and loading is applied. The amount of lateral deflection is dependent on the wall height, the type of soil used for backfill, and loads acting on the wall. The retaining walls, and improvements above the retaining walls, should be designed to incorporate an appropriate amount of lateral deflection as determined by the structural engineer. Retaining walls should be provided with a drainage system adequate to prevent the buildup of hydrostatic forces, and should be waterproofed as required by the project architect. The soil immediately adjacent to the backfilled retaining wall should be composed of free draining material that is completely wrapped in Mirafi 140N (or equivalent) filter fabric for a lateral distance of 1 foot for the bottom two-thirds of the height of the retaining wall. The upper one-third of the wall backfill should be comprised of less permeable compacted fill to reduce water infiltration. Alternatively, a drainage panel, such as a Miradrain 6000 or equivalent, can be placed along the back of the wall as shown on Figure 3. Geocon Project No. T2733-22-01 - 8 - October 12, 2016 The use of drainage openings through the base of the wall (weep holes) is not recommended where the seepage could be a nuisance or otherwise adversely affect the property adjacent to the base of the wall. The recommendations herein assume a properly compacted backfill (EI of 20 or less) with no hydrostatic forces or imposed surcharge load. If conditions different than those described are expected, or if specific drainage details are desired, Geocon should be contacted for additional recommendations. Wall foundations should be at least 18 inches wide and extend at least 24 inches below lowest adjacent pad grade. Wall foundations should be deepened such that the outside edge of the foundation is at least 7 feet horizontally from the face of the slope. Reinforcement for continuous foundations should consist of at least four, No. 4 steel, steel reinforcing bars placed horizontally in the footings, two near the top and two near the bottom. The project structural engineer should design the reinforcement for the concrete foundations. Foundations may be designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of 2,000 pounds per square foot (psf) (dead plus live load). The bearing pressure may be increased by one-third for transient loads due to wind or seismic forces. The estimated maximum total settlement for the planned retaining walls with a bearing pressure of 2,000 psf is 1/2 inch with differential settlement on the order of 1/2 inch over a horizontal distance of 40 feet. For resistance to lateral loads, a passive pressure exerted by an equivalent fluid weight of 175 pounds per cubic foot (pcf) should be used for the design of foundations or shear keys within the existing 4:1 (h:v) channel slopes. The exposed material at the bottom of the retaining wall foundation excavations, within the fill slopes, should be inspected during construction and additional recommendations provided as needed. The upper 12 inches of material along the toe of the wall should not be included in the design for passive resistance. An allowable coefficient of friction of 0.35 may be used between recently placed fill soil and concrete. Plan Review Geocon should review the project plans, prior to final submittal, to verify conformance with the recommendations in this report. Additional analyses may be required after review of the plans. Geocon Project No. T2733-22-01 - 9 - October 12, 2016 LIMITATIONS AND UNIFORMITY OF CONDITIONS 1. The recommendations of this report pertain only to the site investigated and are based upon the assumption that the soil conditions do not deviate from those disclosed in the investigation. If any variations or undesirable conditions are encountered during construction, or if the proposed construction will differ from that anticipated herein, Geocon West, Inc. should be notified so that supplemental recommendations can be given. The evaluation or identification of the potential presence of hazardous or corrosive materials was not part of the scope of services provided by Geocon West, Inc. 2. This report is issued with the understanding that it is the responsibility of the owner, or of his representative, to ensure that the information and recommendations contained herein are brought to the attention of the engineer and contractor for the project and incorporated into the plans, and the necessary steps are taken to see that the contractor and subcontractors carry out such recommendations in the field. 3. The findings of this report are valid as of the date of this report. However, changes in the conditions of a property can occur with the passage of time, whether they are due to natural processes or the works of man on this or adjacent properties. In addition, changes in applicable or appropriate standards may occur, whether they result from legislation or the broadening of knowledge. Accordingly, the findings of this report may be invalidated wholly or partially by changes outside our control. Therefore, this report is subject to review and should not be relied upon after a period of three years Geocon Project No. T2733-22-01 - 10 - October 12, 2016 Should you have any questions regarding this report, or if we may be of further service, please contact the undersigned at your convenience. Very truly yours, GEOCON WEST, INC. \ANAL USA A. BATTIATO No. 2318 CERTIFIED ENGINEERING GEOLOGIST CA%.. Chet E. Robinson GE 2890 Lisa A. Battiato CEG 2316 Attachments: References Figure 1, Vicinity Map Figures 2A and 2B, Field Exploration Location Plans Figure 3, Wall Drainage Detail Figures A-1 to A-9, Logs of Borings Figure B-1, Laboratory Test Results Figure B-2, Direct Shear Test Results Figures B-3 and B-4, Consolidation Test Results Recommended Grading Specifications Distribution: Addressee (Email) Geocon Project No. T2733-22-01 - 11 - October 12, 2016 REFERENCES 1) California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), 2015, Highway Design Manual, dated July 1. 2) California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), 2010, Standard Specifications. 3) California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), 2008, Maintenance Technical Advisory Guide, Volume I — Flexible Pavement Preservation, Second Edition, dated March 7. 4) City of Temecula, 2011, Standard Plan Number 115, Pavement Design Requirements, dated October 12. 5) Cozad & Fox, Inc., 2007, City of Temecula, Department of Public Works, Plans for the Street Widening of City of Temecula Project No. PW 99-11, Pechanga Parkway — Phase II, Federal Project No. PL HL — 5459(014), dated August 14. 6) Geocon Inland Empire, Inc., 2009, Final Report of Testing and Services Performed During Installation of Roadway Improvements, Pechanga Parkway, Phase II Street Improvements, City Project No. PW 99-1, Temecula, California, Geocon Project No. T2462-52-01, dated November 16. 7) Geocon Inland Empire, Inc., 2008, R -Value testing results, communication to City of Temecula, attn.: Steven Beswick, dated August 13. 8) Google Inc., 2013, Google Earth Pro, Version 7.1.2.2041 9) Michael Baker International, City of Temecula, Street Improvement Plan, Pechanga Parkway, From Station 86+00 to Station 117+00, Project No. PW 15-14, dated August 23, revised October 4. 10) Public Works Standards, Inc., 2015, "Greenbook" Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, Published by BNI Building News. Geocon Project No. T2733-22-01 October 12, 2016 GEOCON 1i( W E S T, I N C. GEOTECHNICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MATERIALS 41571 CORNING PLACE, SUITE 101, MURRIETA, CA 92562-7065 PHONE 951-304-2300 FAX 951-304-2392 KBP PECHANGA PARKWAY WIDENING VIA GILBERTO TO NORTH CASINO DRIVE CITY PROJECT PW 15-14 TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA OCTOBER, 2016 I PROJECT NO. T2733-22-01 I FIG. 1 axa ,B-1 -P,*# V* ,1 , ESI9TIM PA PPOWOSED REAMED GEOCON LEGEND Locations are approximate PROJECT BOUNDARY B-4 g Q BORING LOCATION C-1 Q CORE LOCATION J MATCHL INE -STA 95+00 PECHANGA PARKWAY ST LI*4 RELOCATED a urrt iTn; TCHLINESTA. 104+00 16 EDUAR00I 8 Source: Michael Baker International, transmitted 08/23/2016 PECHANGA PARKWAY NOT TO SCALE rGE0C0N E 8 T. 1 N C. EOTECHNICAL, ENVIRONMENTAL, MATERIALS 571 CORNING PLACE 8101. MURRIETA, CALIFORNIA 92562 ONE 951-3042300 FAX 951-3042392 KBP BORING LOCATION MAP PECHANGA PARKWAY WIDENING VIA GILBERTO TO NORTH CASINO DRIVE CITY PROJECT PW 15-14 TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA OCTOBER, 20161 PROJECT NO. T2733-22-01 I FIG. 2A M A TC H L I N E -STA. 104+00 MATCHLINE-STA 104+00 PECHANGA PARKWAY 5 PROPOSED PFIAGTLO. OF OAST. ST. UaT P'FA WFiu SILL PLw rCD,-�5 �- PPOOa PPIUC.TT ST LI0R / GEOCON LEGEND Locations are approximate PROJECT BOUNDARY B-4 BORING LOCATION C-1 O CORE LOCATION -=14 - �''�++.+"._i.� N CASINO DRIVE PECHANGA PARKWAY Source: Michael Baker International, transmitted 08/23/2016 NOT TO SCALE GEOCON W E 8 T. I N C. GEOTECHNICAL, ENVIRONMENTAL, MATERIALS 41571 CORNING PLACE 4101, MURRIETA, CALIFORNIA 92562 PHONE 951-304-2300 FAX 951-304-2392 BORING LOCATION MAP PECHANGA PARKWAY WIDENING VIA GILBERTO TO NORTH CASINO DRIVE CITY PROJECT PW 15-14 TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA KBP 1 OCTOBER, 20161 PROJECT NO. T2733-22-01 FIG. 2B CONCRETE BROWDITCH RETAINING WALL PROPOSED GRADE GROUND SURFACE 2.0 DRAINAGE PANEL 18,. 3/4" CRUSHED ROCK FILTER FABRIC ENVELOPE /Y ; ! c a o o r N c; 4" DIA. PERFORATED ABS OR ADS PIPE NOTES: 1 WALL DRAINAGE PANELS SHOULD CONSISTS OF MIRADRAIN 6000 OR EQUIVALENT 2 FILTER FABRIC SHOULD CONSIST OF MIRAFI 140N OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT 3 VOLUME OF CRUSHED ROCK SHOULD BE AT LEAST 1 CUBIC FOOT PER FOOT OF PIPE 4 CONCRETE BROWDITCH RECOMMENDED FOR SLOPE HEIGHTS GREATER THAN 6 FEET NO SCALE GEOCON W E S T. I N C. ENVIRONMENTAL GEOTECHNICAL MATERIALS 41571 CORNING PLACE, SUITE 101, MURRIETA, CA 92562 PHONE 951-304-2300 FAX 951-304-2392 CER WALL DRAINAGE DETAIL PECHANGA PARKWAY WIDENING VIA GILBERTO TO NORTH CASINO DRIVE CITY PROJECT PW 15-14 TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA OCTOBER, 2016 PROJECT NO. T2733-22-01 I FIG. 3 PROJECT NO. T2733-22-01 DEPTH IN FEET SAMPLE NO. LITHOLOGY GROUNDWATER SOIL CLASS (USCS) BORING B-1 ELEV. (MSL.) DATE COMPLETED 08/31/2016 PENETRATION RESISTANCE (BLOWS/FT.) DRY DENSITY (P.C.F.) MOISTURE CONTENT (%) EQUIPMENT HOLLOW STEM AUGER BY: ALICE ORTON - 0 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION 3-1 @ 0-5 1."I. SM ARTIFICIAL FILL (afu) { - . i Silty SAND, medium dense, moist, dark brown; fine to medium sand; — — ;( . trace coarse sand; trace roots • i -Becomes brown; mica in coarse sand — —B-1 @ 2.5 ,I'�. I :I�.I 26 120.6 10.3 — 4 — I I — @ 5' A.B-1 L j .lI -Becomes dark brown; trace mica; trace roots — 17 126.8 1 I I.5 — 6 — � — • — 8 —B-1 @ 7.5 1".1. I -Becomes brown; fine sand; trace fine to medium sand; trace mica — 17 113.2 14.5 — _ .�.• . 1 SM YOUNGER ALLUVIUM (Qya)• Silty SAND, loose, moist, carbonate tracers — 10 —B-1 @ 10' " I . -Carbonate tracers 14 115.7 1 1.0 I. — 12 — — I .I. 1. _ 1 •. — — _I.I — — 14 — :l F• — — — •I:._{ 1----- B-1 ci 15 .I. . . SM -ML Silty SAND to Sandy SILT, loose to stiff, moist, brown; fine sand; trace medium to coarse sand in silt; trace mica 14 119.1 11.5 — 16 — .. .1 ' — " Total Depth 16.5 feet Groundwater not encountered Penetration resistance for 140 Ib. hammer falling 30" by auto -hammer Backfilled with cuttings on 08/31/2016 Figure A-1, Log of Boring B-1, Page 1 of 1 T2733-22-01 PECHANGA PARKWAY WIDENING.GPJ SAMPLE SYMBOLS ❑ ... SAMPLING UNSUCCESSFUL 11 ... STANDARD PENETRATION TEST • ... DRIVE SAMPLE (UNDISTURBED) ... DISTURBED OR BAG SAMPLE ... CHUNK SAMPLE i ... WATER TABLE OR SEEPAGE NOTE: THE LOG OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS SHOWN HEREON APPLIES ONLY AT THE SPECIFIC BORING OR TRENCH LOCATION AND AT THE DATE INDICATED. IT IS NOT WARRANTED TO BE REPRESENTATIVE OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AT OTHER LOCATIONS AND TIMES. GEOCON PROJECT NO. T2733-22-01 DEPTH IN FEET SAMPLE NO. LITHOLOGY GROUNDWATER SOIL CLASS (USCS) BORING B-2 ELEV. (MSL.) DATE COMPLETED 08/31/2016 PENETRATION RESISTANCE (BLOWS/FT.) DRY DENSITY (P.C.F.) MOISTURE CONTENT (%) EQUIPMENT HOLLOW STEM AUGER BY: ALICE ORTON — 0 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION 3-2 a 0-5:i .{ 1 i \1 ARTIFICIAL FILL (afu) Silty SAND, medium dense, moist, dark brown; fine to medium sand; — — ;: .{ { trace coarse sand; trace roots '— {I — 2 — ;{ -{. I — 3-2 g 2.5 I- I -Trace mica; trace gravel 24 1 20.9 I I 0 J M L Sandy SILT, firm, moist, brown; trace fine to medium sand; trace mica; — 4 no gravel; trace charcoal — • — 13-2 ra 5' 8 103.3 10 5 — 6 — 1— MI. I °UNGERALLUVIUM (Qya) — 8 — 3-2 'a 7.5 Sandy SILT; firm, moist, brown; trace fine to medium sand 11 — 110.1 14 0 — 10 — — B-2 rL 10' -Carbonate stringers 11 — 12 — — SM -SW Silty SAND to Well Graded SAND with Silt, loose, moist, light brown; — 14 — • :•• : fine to medium sand — — —13-2 a 15 : — 14 107.6 0,4 — 16 — : — Total Depth 16.5 feet Groundwater not encountered Penetration resistance for 140 Ib. hammer falling 30" by auto -hammer Backfilled with cuttings on 08/31/2016 Figure A-2, Log of Boring B-2, Page 1 of 1 T2733-22-01 PECHANGA PARKWAY WIDENING.GPJ SAMPLE SYMBOLS ❑ ...SAMPLING UNSUCCESSFUL ... STANDARD PENETRATION TEST ... DISTURBED OR BAG SAMPLE ... CHUNK SAMPLE .... DRIVE SAMPLE (UNDISTURBED) 1 ... WATER TABLE OR SEEPAGE NOTE: THE LOG OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS SHOWN HEREON APPLIES ONLY AT THE SPECIFIC BORING OR TRENCH LOCATION AND AT THE DATE INDICATED. IT IS NOT WARRANTED TO BE REPRESENTATIVE OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AT OTHER LOCATIONS AND TIMES. GEOCON PROJECT NO. T2733-22-01 DEPTH IN F=FT SAMPLE No. LITHOLOGY GROUNDWATER SOIL CLASS (USCS) BORING B-3 ELEV. (MSL.) DATE COMPLETED 08/31/2016 PENETRATION RESISTANCE (BLOWS/FT.) DRY DENSITY (P.C.F.) MOISTURE CONTENT (°/0) EQUIPMENT HOLLOW STEM AUGER BY ALICE ORTON MATERIAL DESCRIPTION - 0 - - 3-3 iu 0-S :i. .� _�. r . i .(. S\I ARTIFICIAL FILL (afu) Silty SAND, medium dense, moist, dark brown; fine to medium sand, trace coarse sand; roots - - 2 - I - .X• )'- : { -Becomes brown - -3-3 @ 2.5 *� I - 16 126.9 12.s - 4 - -:I- 1 - - 'ISt. I - - I. B-3 @ 5' i -Becomes loose; trace gravel 14 112.5 12 0- 6 - - - - :-'-. ----- —--- ---- SM -ML Silty SAND to Sandy SILT, loose to stiff, moist, brown; fine sand; trace B-3 @ 7.5 mica; no gravel; roots 15 1 16.11 H. - 8 - - - ML YOUNGER ALLUVIUM (Qya) Sandy SILT, stiff, moist, light brown; fine sand; trace medium sand; trace - 10 - B-3 @ 10' carbonate stringers; trace mica - 14 121.7 ill_II - 12 - - - 14 - - B-3 a 15 -Becomes stiff; trace medium to coarse sand; trace charcoal 19 106.8 14.7 - 16 - - Total Depth 16.5 feet Groundwater not encountered Penetration resistance for 140 Ib. hammer falling 30" by auto -hammer Backfilled with cuttings on 08/31/2016 Figure A-3, Log of Boring B-3, Page 1 of 1 T2733-22-01 PECHANGA PARKWAY WIDENING.GPJ SAMPLE SYMBOLS ❑ ... SAMPLING UNSUCCESSFUL ... STANDARD PENETRATION TEST III... DRIVE SAMPLE (UNDISTURBED) R... DISTURBED OR BAG SAMPLE ... CHUNK SAMPLE y ... WATER TABLE OR SEEPAGE NOTE: THE LOG OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS SHOWN HEREON APPLIES ONLY AT THE SPECIFIC BORING OR TRENCH LOCATION AND AT THE DATE INDICATED. IT IS NOT WARRANTED TO BE REPRESENTATIVE OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AT OTHER LOCATIONS AND TIMES. GEOCON PROJECT NO. T2733-22-01 DEPTH IN FEET SAMPLE NO LITHOLOGY GROUNDWATER SOIL CLASS (USCS) BORING C-1 ELEV. (MSL.) DATE COMPLETED 09/01/2016 PENETRATION RESISTANCE (BLOWS/FT.) DRY DENSITY (P.C.F.) MOISTURE CONTENT (%) EQUIPMENT BY: ALICE ORTON — 0 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION — — — 2 '-1 CORE' -I @ 1.5_''.x_ ASPHALT CONCRETE7.0 inches °O o°O a6 a AGGREGATE BASE11.0 inches - SM SUBGRADE — \ Silty SAND, medium dense, moist, dark yellowish brown; fine to coarse I sand; trace gravel Total Depth 2 feet 1 inch Groundwater not encountered Backfilled/ 6" AC Cap on 09/01/2016 Figure A-4, Log of Boring C-1, Page 1 of 1 T2733-22-01 PECHANGA PARKWAY WIDENING.GPJ SAMPLE SYMBOLS ❑ ... SAMPLING UNSUCCESSFUL E ... STANDARD PENETRATION TEST ... DRIVE SAMPLE (UNDISTURBED) ... DISTURBED OR BAG SAMPLE ... CHUNK SAMPLE y ... WATER TABLE OR SEEPAGE NOTE: THE LOG OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS SHOWN HEREON APPLIES ONLY AT THE SPECIFIC BORING OR TRENCH LOCATION AND AT THE DATE INDICATED. IT IS NOT WARRANTED TO BE REPRESENTATIVE OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AT OTHER LOCATIONS AND TIMES. GEOCON PROJECT NO. T2733-22-01 DEPTH IN FEET SAMPLE NO. LITHOLOGY GROUNDWATER SOIL CLASS (USCS) BORING C-2 ELEV. (MSL.) DATE COMPLETED 08/31/2016 PENETRATION RESISTANCE (BLOWS/FT.) DRY DENSITY (P.C.F.) MOISTURE CONTENT (%) EQUIPMENT HOLLOW STEM AUGER BY: ALICE ORTON — 0 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION — — -2 n 2' ASPHALT CONCRETE7.0 inches °D. .20 Q Q, 0 AGGRECATE BASE 11.0 inches — 1`" ;+: Sh1 SUBGRADE Silty SAND, medium dense, moist, dark grayish brown; fme to medium sand; trace coarse sand; trace gravel Total Depth 3 feet Groundwater not encountered Backfilled/ 6" AC Cap on 08/31/2016 Figure A-5, Log of Boring C-2, Page 1 of 1 T2733-22-01 PECHANGA PARKWAY WIDENING.GPJ SAMPLE SYMBOLS ❑ ... SAMPLING UNSUCCESSFUL E ... STANDARD PENETRATION TEST ... DRIVE SAMPLE (UNDISTURBED) ... DISTURBED OR BAG SAMPLE Q ... CHUNK SAMPLE ... WATER TABLE OR SEEPAGE NOTE: THE LOG OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS SHOWN HEREON APPLIES ONLY AT THE SPECIFIC BORING OR TRENCH LOCATION AND AT THE DATE INDICATED. IT IS NOT WARRANTED TO BE REPRESENTATIVE OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AT OTHER LOCATIONS AND TIMES. GEOCON PROJECT NO. T2733-22-01 DEPTH DEPTH IN FEET SAMPLE NO. LITHOLOGY GROUNDWATER SOIL CLASS (USCS) BORING C-3 ELEV. (MSL.) DATE COMPLETED 09/01/2016 PENETRATION RESISTANCE (BLOWS/FT.) >.- I - I - CO ---- Z LI: o v >-n' CC o MOISTURE CONTENT (%) EQUIPMENT BY: ALICE ORTON — 0 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION — C -3 CORE. 3 @ 7-20.rOO'o°0 j ASPHALT CONCRETE9.0 inches ;j a.e of AGGREGATE BASE11.5 inches — -S (a__;21 Slit SUBGRADE Silty SAND, medium dense, moist, brown; fine to medium sand; trace coarse sand; trace gravel Total Depth 1 feet 10 inches Groundwater not encountered Backfilled/ 6" AC Cap on 09/01/2016 Figure A-6, Log of Boring C-3, Page 1 of 1 T2733-22-01 PECHANGA PARKWAY WIDENING.GPJ SAMPLE SYMBOLS ❑ ...SAMPLING UNSUCCESSFUL In ... STANDARD PENETRATION TEST ... DISTURBED OR BAG SAMPLE Q ... CHUNK SAMPLE . ... DRIVE SAMPLE (UNDISTURBED) 1 ... WATER TABLE OR SEEPAGE NOTE: THE LOG OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS SHOWN HEREON APPLIES ONLY AT THE SPECIFIC BORING OR TRENCH LOCATION AND AT THE DATE INDICATED. IT IS NOT WARRANTED TO BE REPRESENTATIVE OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AT OTHER LOCATIONS AND TIMES. GEOCON PROJECT NO. T2733-22-01 DEPTH IN FEET SAMPLE NO. LITHOLOGY GROUNDWATER SOIL CLASS (USCS) BORING C-4 ELEV. (MSL.) DATE COMPLETED 08/31/2016 PENETRATION RESISTANCE (BLOWS/FT.) DRY DENSITY (P.C.F.) MOISTURE ! CONTENT (%) EQUIPMENT HOLLOW STEM AUGER BY: ALICE ORTON — 0 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION — — — 2— — C-4 (d 2' ASPHALT CONCRETE6.5 inches °O .o°O b,..4 0.0o 4 D AGGREGATE BASE 17.0 inches — ..1. . 1. ':{1 -i. I .1 SM SUBGRADE Silty SAND, medium dense, moist, dark grayish brown; fine to coarse \ sand; trace gravel / Total Depth 3 feet Groundwater not encountered Backfilled/ 6" AC Cap on 08/31/2016 Figure A-7, Log of Boring C-4, Page 1 of 1 T2733-22-01 PECHANGA PARKWAY WIDENING.GPJ SAMPLE SYMBOLS ❑ ... SAMPLING UNSUCCESSFUL E ... STANDARD PENETRATION TEST ... DISTURBED OR BAG SAMPLE IE ... CHUNK SAMPLE • ... DRIVE SAMPLE (UNDISTURBED) 1 ... WATER TABLE OR SEEPAGE NOTE: THE LOG OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS SHOWN HEREON APPLIES ONLY AT THE SPECIFIC BORING OR TRENCH LOCATION AND AT THE DATE INDICATED. IT IS NOT WARRANTED TO BE REPRESENTATIVE OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AT OTHER LOCATIONS AND TIMES. GEOCON PROJECT NO. T2733-22-01 DEPTH IN FEET SAMPLE NO LITHOLOGY GROUNDWATER SOIL CLASS (USCS) BORING C-5 ELEV. (MSL) DATE COMPLETED 08/31/2016 PENETRATION RESISTANCE (BLOWS/FT.) DRY DENSITY (P.C.F.) MOISTURE CONTENT (%) EQUIPMENT HOLLOW STEM AUGER BY: ALICE ORTON 0 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION — — — — 2 — (-5 :a 2' ASPHALT CONCRETE6.5 inches °Oo°O a0a o o 000 n AGGREGATE BASE17.0 inches — -1 ' 1 i. i S\1 SUBGRADE Silty SAND, medium dense, moist, dark grayish brown; trace gravel Total Depth 3 feet Groundwater not encountered Backfilled/ 6" AC Cap on 08/31/2016 Figure A-8, Log of Boring C-5, Page 1 of 1 T2733-22-01 PECHANGA PARKWAY WIDENING.GPJ SAMPLE SYMBOLS ❑ .. SAMPLING UNSUCCESSFUL 11 ... STANDARD PENETRATION TEST .. ... DISTURBED OR BAG SAMPLE IE ... CHUNK SAMPLE I. ... DRIVE SAMPLE (UNDISTURBED) 1 ... WATER TABLE OR SEEPAGE NOTE: THE LOG OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS SHOWN HEREON APPLIES ONLY AT THE SPECIFIC BORING OR TRENCH LOCATION AND AT THE DATE INDICATED. IT IS NOT WARRANTED TO BE REPRESENTATIVE OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AT OTHER LOCATIONS AND TIMES. GEOCON PROJECT NO. T2733-22-01 DEPTH IN FEET(USCS) SAMPLE NO.CLASS LITHOLOGY GROUNDWATER SOIL BORING C-6 ELEV. (MSL.) DATE COMPLETED 08/31/2016 PENETRATION RESISTANCE (BLOWS/FT.) DRY DENSITY (P.C.F.) MOISTURE CONTENT (%) EQUIPMENT HOLLOW STEM AUGER BY: ALICE ORTON MATERIAL DESCRIPTION — 0 — — 2C-6 C 2' ASPHALT CONCRETE7.0 inches °p d°O b0.. a O'o n AGGREGATE BASE17.0 inches — +; -1.�." . SM SUBGRADE \ Silty SAND with Gravel, dense, slightly moist, dark yellowish brown; few cobbles ' Total Depth 2.5 feet Groundwater not encountered Backfilled/ 6" AC Cap on 08/31/2016 Figure A-9, Log of Boring C-6, Page 1 of 1 T2733-22-01 PECHANGA PARKWAY WIDENING.GPJ SAMPLE SYMBOLS ❑ ... SAMPLING UNSUCCESSFUL 11 ... STANDARD PENETRATION TEST ... DRIVE SAMPLE (UNDISTURBED) ... DISTURBED OR BAG SAMPLE ... CHUNK SAMPLE y ... WATER TABLE OR SEEPAGE NOTE: THE LOG OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS SHOWN HEREON APPLIES ONLY AT THE SPECIFIC BORING OR TRENCH LOCATION AND AT THE DATE INDICATED. IT IS NOT WARRANTED TO BE REPRESENTATIVE OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AT OTHER LOCATIONS AND TIMES. GEOCON Site Number: 1 Recorded By: Alesia Hsiao Job Number: 153547 Date: 5/11/2016 Time: 11:42 a.m. Location: Along Eona Circle Source of Peak Noise: Traffic along Eona Circle and Pechanga Parkway, birds chirping, residential noise (garage doors, car doors, etc.) Noise Data Leq (dB) Lmin (dB) Lmax (dB) Peak (dB) 50.9 34.5 65.6 87.5 Equipment Category Type Vendor Model Serial No. Cert. Date Note Sound Sound Level Meter Bruel & Kja r 2250 2548189 1/4/2016 Microphone Bruel & Kjaer 4189 2543364 1/4/2016 Preamp Bruel & Kjmr ZC 0032 4265 1/4/2016 Calibrator Bruel & Kja r 4231 2545667 1/4/2016 Weather Data Est. Duration: 10 minutes Sky: 3`F Sunny Note: dBA Offset = 0.01 Sensor Height (ft): 5 ft Wind Ave Speed (mph / mis) Temperature (degrees Fahrenheit) Barometer Pressure (hPa) 1.0 82.6 29.98 Photo of Measurement Location 2250 Instrument: Time 2250 Application: FSI BZ7225 Version 4.4 Start Time: LAFmin [dB] 05/11/2016 11:42:15 End Time: FS 05/11/2016 11:52:15 Elapsed Time: 50.9 00:10:00 Bandwidth: Time 1 /3 -octave Max Input Level: 0:10:00 138.72 Instrument Serial Number: Time Frequency Broadband (excl. Peak): FSI AZ Broadband Peak: LAFmin [dB] C Spectrum: FS Z Instrument Serial Number: Start time 2548189 Microphone Serial Number: Overload [%] 2543364 Input: LAFmin [dB] Top Socket Windscreen Correction: None Sound Field Correction: 50.9 Free -field Calibration Time: Start time 05/09/2016 17:06:48 Calibration Type: Overload [%] External reference Sensitivity: LAFmin [dB] 64.5731016993523 mV/Pa PEC001 Start time End time Elapsed time Overload [%] LAeq [dB] LAFmax [dB] LAFmin [dB] Value 0.00 50.9 65.6 34.5 Time 11:42:15 AM 11:52:15 AM 0:10:00 Date 05/11/2016 05/11/2016 PEC001 dB 05/11/2016 11:42:15 AM - 11:52:15 AM 140 130—i 1 120—+ 110— 100-1 90 — 80-1 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 12.50 31.50 63 125 250 500 _ LZeq - LZFmax _ LZFmin Cursor: (A) Leq=50.9 dB LFmax=65.6 dB LFmin=34.5 dB 1000 2000 4000 8000 16000 A Z Hz % Based on LAF , 10ms 100 90 — PEC001 Class width: 0.2 dB 05/11/2016 11:42:15 AM - 11:52:15 AM 80 — 70 — 60— L 1 I I I I 50— r + 40 — 30 — 20 — 10- 0 1 10 20 Level r - L 1 I 30 40 50 60 70 Cumulative Cursor: [74.8 ; 75.0[ dB Level: 0.0% Cumulative: 0.0% 80 90 100 110 120 L1 = 59.0 dB L5 = 55.6 dB L10 = 53.9 dB L50 = 48.5 dB L90 = 43.1 dB L95 = 40.8 dB L99 = 36.4 dB 130 140 dB PEC001 • Sound Start time Elapsed time dB LAFmax [dB] 140 120— 100 80 — Value 7 F- u - , __Fr-L -LF- r r` L r L - _ ,fir L r - - Date 05/11/2016 20 — 7 , r r I I I I 11:44:00 AM 11:46:00 AM 11:48:00 AM 11:50:00 AM 11:52:00 AM LAleq LAFmax LCpeak LAFmin Cursor: 05/11/2016 11:47:10 AM - 11:47:20 AM LAIeq=50.9 dB LAFmax=54.9 dB LCpeak=76.5 dB LAFmin=43.3 dB PEC001 Start time Elapsed time LAIeq [dB] LAFmax [dB] LAFmin [dB] Value 50.9 54.9 43.3 Time 11:47:10 AM 0:00:10 Date 05/11/2016 dB 05/11/2016 11:47:10 AM - 11:47:20 AM 140 120 PEC001 100- 80 00- 80 — 60 40 20 0 12.50 31.50 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 16000 A Z Hz _ LZeq Cursor: (A) Leq=48.6 dB dB ■ Sound PEC001 Periodic reports 140 120— 100 — -i 1 L r J 7 1 J 80 60 40 -- 20 — Cursor: r L -i 7 7 r 11:44:00 LAleq I AM 11:46:00 LAFmax LAleq=50.9 I AM 11:48:00 LCpeak dB LAFmax=58.7 I AM 11:50:00 LAFmin I AM LAFmin=38.5 dB I 11:52:00 AM 05/11/2016 11:47:00 AM - 11:48:00 AM dB LCpeak=87.5 dB PEC001 Periodic reports dB 05/11/2016 11:47:00 AM - 11:48:00 AM 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 PEC001 Periodic reports 12.50 31.50 63 125 250 500 _ LZeq - LZFmax _ LZFmin Cursor: (A) Leq=47.5 dB LFmax=58.7 dB LFmin=38.5 dB 1000 2000 4000 8000 16000 A Z Hz Start time Elapsed time Overload [%] LAleq [dB] LAFmax [dB] LAFmin [dB] Value 0.00 50.9 58.7 38.5 Time 11:47:00 AM 0:01:00 Date 05/11/2016 dB 05/11/2016 11:47:00 AM - 11:48:00 AM 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 PEC001 Periodic reports 12.50 31.50 63 125 250 500 _ LZeq - LZFmax _ LZFmin Cursor: (A) Leq=47.5 dB LFmax=58.7 dB LFmin=38.5 dB 1000 2000 4000 8000 16000 A Z Hz PEC001 Periodic reports % Based on LAF , 10ms Class width: 0.2 dB 05/11/2016 11:47:00 AM - 11:48:00 AM 100 90 — 80— r 70 — 60 — 50- 40 30 L r J r J L r 20- 10— r -r � L r J L 0 I I I 10 20 30 40 50 60 Level Cumulative Cursor: [74.8 ; 75.0[ dB Level: 0.0% Cumulative: 0.0% r 70 { 80 r L1 = 52.2 dB L5 = 50.1 dB L10 = 49.6 dB L50 = 47.3 dB L90 = 42.6 dB L95 = 40.7 dB L99 = 39.0 dB 90 100 110 120 130 140 dB Site Number: 2 Recorded By: Alesia Hsiao Job Number: 153547 Date: 5/11/2016 Time: 12:02 p.m. Location: Along Parsippany Center Source of Peak Noise: Traffic along Parsippany Center, birds chirping, residential noise (garage doors, car doors, etc.) Noise Data Leq (dB) Lmin (dB) Lmax (dB) Peak (dB) 62.1 38.0 93.3 89.2 Equipment Category Type Vendor Model Serial No. Cert. Date Note Sound Sound Level Meter Bruel & Kja r 2250 2548189 1/4/2016 Microphone Bruel & Kja r 4189 2543364 1/4/2016 Preamp Bruel & Kja r ZC 0032 4265 1/4/2016 Calibrator Bruel & Kjaer 4231 2545667 1/4/2016 Weather Data Est. Duration: 10 minutes Sky: Sunny Note: dBA Offset = 0.01 Sensor Height (ft): 5 ft Wind Ave Speed (mph / mis) Temperature (degrees Fahrenheit) Barometer Pressure (hPa) 0.8 84.4 29.98 Photo of Measurement Location 2250 Instrument: Time 2250 Application: FSI BZ7225 Version 4.4 Start Time: LAFmin [dB] 05/11/2016 12:02:39 End Time: FS 05/11/2016 12:12:39 Elapsed Time: 62.1 00:10:00 Bandwidth: Time 1 /3 -octave Max Input Level: 0:10:00 138.72 Instrument Serial Number: Time Frequency Broadband (excl. Peak): FSI AZ Broadband Peak: LAFmin [dB] C Spectrum: FS Z Instrument Serial Number: Start time 2548189 Microphone Serial Number: Overload [%] 2543364 Input: LAFmin [dB] Top Socket Windscreen Correction: None Sound Field Correction: 62.1 Free -field Calibration Time: Start time 05/09/2016 17:06:48 Calibration Type: Overload [%] External reference Sensitivity: LAFmin [dB] 64.5731016993523 mV/Pa PEC002 Start time End time Elapsed time Overload [%] LAeq [dB] LAFmax [dB] LAFmin [dB] Value 0.00 62.1 93.3 38.0 Time 12:02:39 PM 12:12:39 PM 0:10:00 Date 05/11/2016 05/11/2016 PEC002 dB 05/11/2016 12:02:39 PM - 12:12:39 PM 140 130-1 120—+ I 110— 100—� 1 I I 90—T 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 L 12.50 31.50 63 125 250 500 _ LZeq _ LZFmax _ LZFmin Cursor: (A) Leq=62.1 dB LFmax=93.3 dB LFmin=38.0 dB 1000 2000 4000 8000 16000 A Z Hz PEC002 0/0 Based on LAF , 10ms Class width: 0.2 dB 05/11/2016 12:02:39 PM - 12:12:39 PM 100 90 80 70 60 — L J 50 — r , 40 — 30 — 20 — r L r J 7 J L L 10- 0 r 1 10 20 30 40 50 60 Level Cumulative Cursor: [74.8 ; 75.0[ dB Level: 0.0% Cumulative: 0.6% L1 = 70.0 dB L5 = 54.3 dB L10 = 51.5 dB L50 = 44.5 dB L90 = 41.2 dB L95 = 40.5 dB L99 = 38.8 dB 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 dB PEC002 ■ Sound dB Start time 140 120 100 80 60r -- . ___ ____L L r __ ____ L r r _ _ L r r Time _L___ L r r _ 05/11/2016 • 40 20 r L - r L r = r r I I I I I 12:04:00 PM 12:06:00 PM 12:08:00 PM 12:10:00 PM 12:12:00 PM LAleq LAFmax LCpeak LAFmin Cursor: 05/11/2016 12:07:30 PM - 12:07:40 PM LAleq=54.3 dB LAFmax=55.6 dB LCpeak=84.6 dB LAFmin=41.3 dB PEC002 Start time Elapsed time LAleq [dB] LAFinax [dB] LAFmin [dB] Value 54.3 55.6 41.3 Time 12:07:30 PM 0:00:10 Date 05/11/2016 PEC002 dB 05/11/2016 12:07:30 PM - 12:07:40 PM 140 120 100 80 — 60 — 40 20 0 12.50 31.50 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 16000 A Z Hz _ LZeq Cursor: (A) Leq=45.3 dB ■ Sound dB PEC002 Periodic reports 140 120— 100— 80— 60 — 40 20— Cursor: r J L , I I L . —1 I ' --------, I I , I 12:04:00 PM LAleq I 12:06:00 PM LAFmax LCpeak 12:08:00 I PM LAFmin I I 12:10:00 PM 12:12:00 PM dB LAFmin=39.1 dB 05/11/2016 12:07:00 PM - 12:08:00 PM LAieq=56.4 dB LAFmax=65.3 dB LCpeak=89.2 PEC002 Periodic reports dB 05/11/2016 12:07:00 PM - 12:08:00 PM 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 PEC002 Periodic reports 12.50 31.50 63 125 250 500 _ LZeq _ LZFmax _ LZFmin Cursor: (A) Leq=47.5 dB LFmax=65.3 dB LFmin=39.1 dB 1000 2000 4000 8000 16000 A Z Hz Start time Elapsed time Overload [%] LAIeq [dB] LAFmax [dB] LAFmin [dB] Value 0.00 56.4 65.3 39.1 Time 12:07:00 PM 0:01:00 Date 05/11/2016 dB 05/11/2016 12:07:00 PM - 12:08:00 PM 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 PEC002 Periodic reports 12.50 31.50 63 125 250 500 _ LZeq _ LZFmax _ LZFmin Cursor: (A) Leq=47.5 dB LFmax=65.3 dB LFmin=39.1 dB 1000 2000 4000 8000 16000 A Z Hz PEC002 Periodic reports Based on LAF , 10ms Class width: 0.2 dB 05/11/2016 12:07:00 PM - 12:08:00 PM 100 90 — 80 — 70 — 60 — 50 — 40 — 30 — J L r L r .1 J L J y L L 20 — 10- 7 0 r i- 1 -r, I 1 I ti L r r L1 = 57.5 dB L5 = 53.5 dB L10 = 49.8 dB L50 = 43.3 dB L90 = 40.6 dB L95 = 40.3 dB L99 = 39.8 dB 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 dB Level Cumulative Cursor: [74.8 ; 75.0[ dB Level: 0.0% Cumulative: 0.0% Site Number: 3 Recorded By: Alesia Hsiao Job Number: 153547 Date: 5/11/2016 Time: 12:26 p.m. Location: Along Klamath Court Source of Peak Noise: Traffic along Pechanga Parkway, birds chirping, dogs parking, residential noise (garage doors, car doors, etc.) Noise Data Leq (dB) Lmin (dB) Lmax (dB) Peak (dB) 58.2 38.7 87.5 86.8 Equipment Category Type Vendor Model Serial No. Cert. Date Note Sound Sound Level Meter Bruel & Kja r 2250 2548189 1/4/2016 Microphone Bruel & Kja r 4189 2543364 1/4/2016 Preamp Bruel & Kja r ZC 0032 4265 1/4/2016 Calibrator Bruel & Kja r 4231 2545667 1/4/2016 Weather Data Est. Duration: 10 minutes Sky: -E Sunny Note: dBA Offset = 0.01 Sensor Height (ft): 5 ft Wind Ave Speed (mph / m/s) Temperature (degrees Fahrenheit) Barometer Pressure (hPa) 1.2 82.4 29.98 Photo of Measurement Location 2250 Instrument: Time 2250 Application: FSI BZ7225 Version 4.4 Start Time: LAFmin [dB] 05/11/2016 12:26:03 End Time: FS 05/11/2016 12:36:03 Elapsed Time: 58.2 00:10:00 Bandwidth: Time 1/3 -octave Max Input Level: 0:10:00 138.72 Instrument Serial Number: Time Frequency Broadband (excl. Peak): FSI AZ Broadband Peak: LAFmin [dB] C Spectrum: FS Z Instrument Serial Number: Start time 2548189 Microphone Serial Number: Overload [%] 2543364 Input: LAFmin [dB] Top Socket Windscreen Correction: None Sound Field Correction: 58.2 Free -field Calibration Time: Start time 05/09/2016 17:06:48 Calibration Type: Overload [%] External reference Sensitivity: LAFmin [dB] 64.5731016993523 mV/Pa PEC003 Start time End time Elapsed time Overload [%] LAeq [dB] LAFmax [dB] LAFmin [dB] Value 0.00 58.2 87.5 38.7 Time 12:26:03 PM 12:36:03 PM 0:10:00 Date 05/11/2016 05/11/2016 PEC003 dB 05/11/2016 12:26:03 PM - 12:36:03 PM 140 ; 130 I I 120—* 110— ; 100—It 90—T I I 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 1 12.50 31.50 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 16000 A Z Hz _ LZeq _ LZFmax _ LZFmin Cursor: (A) Leq=58.2 dB LFmax=87.5 dB LFmin=38.7 dB ok 100 90 80 Based on LAF , 10ms I � L I 70 60 50 — r 40 — 30 — 1 20 — 10— 0 PEC003 Class width: 0.2 dB 05/11/2016 12:26:03 PM - 12:36:03 PM J L r L 10 40 50 60 70 Level Cumulative Cursor: [74.8 ; 75.0[ dB Level: 0.0% Cumulative: 0.3% 20 30 80 90 100 110 120 L1 = 59.4 dB L5 = 55.6 dB L10 = 53.9 dB L50 = 49.0 dB L90 = 45.3 dB L95 = 44.0 dB L99 = 41.1 dB 130 140 dB PEC003 • Sound Start time Elapsed time dB 140 120— 100 80 _ --1 Z L 1 1 - , 45.4 Time L r 0:00:10 _,—,_,--r- �- , , Z� 40 — 20 — I� l r , I I I I I 12:28:00 PM 12:30:00 PM 12:32:00 PM 12:34:00 PM 12:36:00 PM LAleq LAFmax LCpeak LAFmin Cursor: 05/11/2016 12:31:00 PM - 12:31:10 PM LAleq=47.8 dB LAFmax=49.8 dB LCpeak=74.7 dB LAFmin=45.4 dB PEC003 Start time Elapsed time LAIeq [dB] LAFmax [dB] LAFmin [dB] Value 47.8 49.8 45.4 Time 12:31:00 PM 0:00:10 Date 05/11/2016 dB 05/11/2016 12:31:00 PM - 12:31:10 PM 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 PEC003 12.50 31.50 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 16000 A Z Hz _ LZeq Cursor: (A) Leq=47.2 dB dB PEC003 Periodic reports • Sound 140 120 100 — 80 — 60 — 40 — 20 — Cursor: — L. r J L . r 1 T 4 4 L r r LAleq I 12:28:00 12:31:00 PM I PM 12:30:00 PM 12:32:00 LAFmax LCpeak I I PM 12:34:00 I PM 12:36:00 PM LAFmin=45.4 dB 05/11/2016 - 12:32:00 PM LAleq=51.2 dB LAFmax=55.1 LAFmin dB LCpeak=86.8 dB PEC003 Periodic reports dB 05/11/2016 12:31:00 PM - 12:32:00 PM 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 PEC003 Periodic reports 12.50 31.50 63 125 250 500 _ LZeq _ LZFmax _ LZFmin Cursor: (A) Leq=50.4 dB LFmax=55.1 dB LFmin=45.4 dB 1000 2000 4000 8000 16000 A Z Hz Start time Elapsed time Overload [%] LAleq [dB] LAFmax [dB] LAFmin [dB] Value 0.00 51.2 55.1 45.4 Time 12:31:00 PM 0:01:00 Date 05/11/2016 dB 05/11/2016 12:31:00 PM - 12:32:00 PM 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 PEC003 Periodic reports 12.50 31.50 63 125 250 500 _ LZeq _ LZFmax _ LZFmin Cursor: (A) Leq=50.4 dB LFmax=55.1 dB LFmin=45.4 dB 1000 2000 4000 8000 16000 A Z Hz PEC003 Periodic reports % Based on LAF , 10ms Class width: 0.2 dB 05/11/2016 12:31:00 PM - 12:32:00 PM 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 10 20 Level 30 40 50 60 Cumulative Cursor: [74.8 ; 75.0[ dB Level: 0.0% Cumulative: 0.0% 70 80 90 100 110 120 L1 = 53.2 dB L5 = 52.9 dB L10 = 52.6 dB L50 = 50.0 dB L90 = 46.9 dB L95 = 46.1 dB L99 = 45.7 dB 130 140 dB GEOCON W E S T. I N C. GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS 41571 CORNING PLACE SUITE 101 MURRIETA, CA 92562-7065 PHONE 951-304-2300 FAX 951-304-2392 KBP LABORATORY TEST RESULTS PECHANGA PARKWAY WIDENING VIA GILBERTO TO NORTH CASINO DRIVE CITY PROJECT PW 15-14 TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA I OCTOBER, 2016 PROJECT NO. T2733-22-01 ]FIG B-1 SUMMARY OF LABORATORY R -VALUE TEST RESULTS ASTM D2844 Sample No. R -Value C-2 @ 2' 50 C-4 @ 2' 32 C-6 @ 2' 44 GEOCON W E S T. I N C. GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS 41571 CORNING PLACE SUITE 101 MURRIETA, CA 92562-7065 PHONE 951-304-2300 FAX 951-304-2392 KBP LABORATORY TEST RESULTS PECHANGA PARKWAY WIDENING VIA GILBERTO TO NORTH CASINO DRIVE CITY PROJECT PW 15-14 TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA I OCTOBER, 2016 PROJECT NO. T2733-22-01 ]FIG B-1 Shear Stress (psf) 4500 4000 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 0 1000 2000 3000 Normal Stress (psf) 4000 SAMPLE ID SOIL TYPE INITIAL DRY DENSITY (pcf) INITIAL MOISTURE (%) FINAL— MOISTURE (%) C (psf) (deg) B-1 @ 7.5' SM 113.2 14.5 17.3 370 34 B-2 @ 5' SM 103.3 19.5 20.6 130 31 GEOCON W E S T, I N C. GEOTECHNICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MATERIALS 41571 CORNING PLACE, SUITE 101, MURRIETA, CA 92562-7065 PHONE 951-304-2300 FAX 951-304-2392 KBP I DIRECT SHEAR TEST RESULTS PECHANGA PARKWAY WIDENING VIA GILBERTO TO NORTH CASINO DRIVE CITY PROJET PW 15-14 TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA OCTOBER, 2016 I PROJECT NO. T2733-22-01 I FIG B-2 Percent Consolidation 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 WATER ADDED AT 2 KSF 0.1 1.0 Consolidation Pressure (psf) 10.0 SAMPLE ID SOIL TYPE DRY DENSITY (PCF) INITIAL MOISTURE (%) FINAL MOISTURE (%) B-3 @ 7.5' SM -ML 116.0 8.3 16.7 GEOCO V W E S T, I N C. (4) GEOTECHNICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MATERIALS 41571 CORNING PLACE SUITE 101, MURRIETA, CA 92562 PHONE 951-304-2300 FAX 951-304-2392 CER CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS PECHANGA PARKWAY WIDENING VIA GILBERTO TO NORTH CASINO DRIVE CITY PROJECT PW 15-14 TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA OCTOBER, 20161 PROJECT NO. T2733-22-01 1 FIG B-3 Percent Consolidation 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 WATER ADDED AT 2 KSF 0.1 1.0 Consolidation Pressure (psf) 10.0 SAMPLE ID SOIL TYPE DRY DENSITY (PCF) INITIAL MOISTURE (%) FINAL MOISTURE (%) B-3 @ 10' ML 121.7 10.0 13.0 GEOCON W E S T, I N C. • GEOTECHNICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MATERIALS 41571 CORNING PLACE SUITE 101, MURRIETA, CA 92562 PHONE 951-304-2300 FAX 951-304-2392 CER I CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS PECHANGA PARKWAY WIDENING VIA GILBERTO TO NORTH CASINO DRIVE CITY PROJECT PW 15-14 TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA OCTOBER, 2016 1 PROJECT NO. T2733-22-01 I FIG B-4 1.1 RECOMMENDED GRADING SPECIFICATIONS 1. GENERAL These Recommended Grading Specifications shall be used in conjunction with the Geotechnical Report for the project prepared by Geocon. The recommendations contained in the text of the Geotechnical Report are a part of the earthwork and grading specifications and shall supersede the provisions contained hereinafter in the case of conflict. 1.2 Prior to the commencement of grading, a geotechnical consultant (Consultant) shall be employed for the purpose of observing earthwork procedures and testing the fills for substantial conformance with the recommendations of the Geotechnical Report and these specifications. The Consultant should provide adequate testing and observation services so that they may assess whether, in their opinion, the work was performed in substantial conformance with these specifications. It shall be the responsibility of the Contractor to assist the Consultant and keep them apprised of work schedules and changes so that personnel may be scheduled accordingly. 1.3 It shall be the sole responsibility of the Contractor to provide adequate equipment and methods to accomplish the work in accordance with applicable grading codes or agency ordinances, these specifications and the approved grading plans. If, in the opinion of the Consultant, unsatisfactory conditions such as questionable soil materials, poor moisture condition, inadequate compaction, and/or adverse weather result in a quality of work not in conformance with these specifications, the Consultant will be empowered to reject the work and recommend to the Owner that grading be stopped until the unacceptable conditions are corrected. 2. DEFINITIONS 2.1 Owner shall refer to the owner of the property or the entity on whose behalf the grading work is being performed and who has contracted with the Contractor to have grading performed. 2.2 Contractor shall refer to the Contractor performing the site grading work. 2.3 Civil Engineer or Engineer of Work shall refer to the California licensed Civil Engineer or consulting firm responsible for preparation of the grading plans, surveying and verifying as -graded topography. 2.4 Consultant shall refer to the soil engineering and engineering geology consulting firm retained to provide geotechnical services for the project. GI rev. 07/2015 2.5 Soil Engineer shall refer to a California licensed Civil Engineer retained by the Owner, who is experienced in the practice of geotechnical engineering. The Soil Engineer shall be responsible for having qualified representatives on-site to observe and test the Contractor's work for conformance with these specifications. 2.6 Engineering Geologist shall refer to a California licensed Engineering Geologist retained by the Owner to provide geologic observations and recommendations during the site grading. 2.7 Geotechnical Report shall refer to a soil report (including all addenda) which may include a geologic reconnaissance or geologic investigation that was prepared specifically for the development of the project for which these Recommended Grading Specifications are intended to apply. 3. MATERIALS 3.1 Materials for compacted fill shall consist of any soil excavated from the cut areas or imported to the site that, in the opinion of the Consultant, is suitable for use in construction of fills. In general, fill materials can be classified as soil fills, soil -rock fills or rock fills, as defined below. 3.1.1 Soil fills are defined as fills containing no rocks or hard lumps greater than 12 inches in maximum dimension and containing at least 40 percent by weight of material smaller than 3/4 inch in size. 3.1.2 Soil -rock fills are defined as fills containing no rocks or hard lumps larger than 4 feet in maximum dimension and containing a sufficient matrix of soil fill to allow for proper compaction of soil fill around the rock fragments or hard lumps as specified in Paragraph 6.2. Oversize rock is defined as material greater than 12 inches. 3.1.3 Rock fills are defined as fills containing no rocks or hard lumps larger than 3 feet in maximum dimension and containing little or no fines. Fines are defined as material smaller than 3/4 inch in maximum dimension. The quantity of fines shall be less than approximately 20 percent of the rock fill quantity. 3.2 Material of a perishable, spongy, or otherwise unsuitable nature as determined by the Consultant shall not be used in fills. 3.3 Materials used for fill, either imported or on-site, shall not contain hazardous materials as defined by the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 4, Chapter 30, Articles 9 GI rev. 07/2015 and 10; 40CFR; and any other applicable local, state or federal laws. The Consultant shall not be responsible for the identification or analysis of the potential presence of hazardous materials. However, if observations, odors or soil discoloration cause Consultant to suspect the presence of hazardous materials, the Consultant may request from the Owner the termination of grading operations within the affected area. Prior to resuming grading operations, the Owner shall provide a written report to the Consultant indicating that the suspected materials are not hazardous as defined by applicable laws and regulations. 3.4 The outer 15 feet of soil -rock fill slopes, measured horizontally, should be composed of properly compacted soil fill materials approved by the Consultant. Rock fill may extend to the slope face, provided that the slope is not steeper than 2:1 (horizontal:vertical) and a soil layer no thicker than 12 inches is track -walked onto the face for landscaping purposes. This procedure may be utilized provided it is acceptable to the governing agency, Owner and Consultant. 3.5 Samples of soil materials to be used for fill should be tested in the laboratory by the Consultant to determine the maximum density, optimum moisture content, and, where appropriate, shear strength, expansion, and gradation characteristics of the soil. 3.6 During grading, soil or groundwater conditions other than those identified in the Geotechnical Report may be encountered by the Contractor. The Consultant shall be notified immediately to evaluate the significance of the unanticipated condition 4. CLEARING AND PREPARING AREAS TO BE FILLED 4.1 Areas to be excavated and filled shall be cleared and grubbed. Clearing shall consist of complete removal above the ground surface of trees, stumps, brush, vegetation, man-made structures, and similar debris. Grubbing shall consist of removal of stumps, roots, buried logs and other unsuitable material and shall be performed in areas to be graded. Roots and other projections exceeding 11/2 inches in diameter shall be removed to a depth of 3 feet below the surface of the ground. Borrow areas shall be grubbed to the extent necessary to provide suitable fill materials. 4.2 Asphalt pavement material removed during clearing operations should be properly disposed at an approved off-site facility or in an acceptable area of the project evaluated by Geocon and the property owner. Concrete fragments that are free of reinforcing steel may be placed in fills, provided they are placed in accordance with Section 6.2 or 6.3 of this document. GI rev. 07/2015 4.3 After clearing and grubbing of organic matter and other unsuitable material, loose or porous soils shall be removed to the depth recommended in the Geotechnical Report. The depth of removal and compaction should be observed and approved by a representative of the Consultant. The exposed surface shall then be plowed or scarified to a minimum depth of 6 inches and until the surface is free from uneven features that would tend to prevent uniform compaction by the equipment to be used. 4.4 Where the slope ratio of the original ground is steeper than 5:1 (horizontal:vertical), or where recommended by the Consultant, the original ground should be benched in accordance with the following illustration. TYPICAL BENCHING DETAIL Finish Grade Original Ground Remove All Unsuitable Material As Recommended By Consultant Slope To Be Such That Sloughing Or Sliding Does Not Occur Finish Slope Surface Varies See Note 1 See Note 2_ No Scale DETAIL NOTES: (1) Key width "B" should be a minimum of 10 feet, or sufficiently wide to permit complete coverage with the compaction equipment used. The base of the key should be graded horizontal, or inclined slightly into the natural slope. (2) The outside of the key should be below the topsoil or unsuitable surficial material and at least 2 feet into dense formational material. Where hard rock is exposed in the bottom of the key, the depth and configuration of the key may be modified as approved by the Consultant. 4.5 After areas to receive fill have been cleared and scarified, the surface should be moisture conditioned to achieve the proper moisture content, and compacted as recommended in Section 6 of these specifications. GI rev. 07/2015 5. COMPACTION EQUIPMENT 5.1 Compaction of soil or soil -rock fill shall be accomplished by sheepsfoot or segmented -steel wheeled rollers, vibratory rollers, multiple -wheel pneumatic -tired rollers, or other types of acceptable compaction equipment. Equipment shall be of such a design that it will be capable of compacting the soil or soil -rock fill to the specified relative compaction at the specified moisture content. 5.2 Compaction of rock fills shall be performed in accordance with Section 6.3. 6. PLACING, SPREADING AND COMPACTION OF FILL MATERIAL 6.1 Soil fill, as defined in Paragraph 3.1.1, shall be placed by the Contractor in accordance with the following recommendations: 6.1.1 Soil fill shall be placed by the Contractor in layers that, when compacted, should generally not exceed 8 inches. Each layer shall be spread evenly and shall be thoroughly mixed during spreading to obtain uniformity of material and moisture in each layer. The entire fill shall be constructed as a unit in nearly level lifts. Rock materials greater than 12 inches in maximum dimension shall be placed in accordance with Section 6.2 or 6.3 of these specifications. 6.1.2 In general, the soil fill shall be compacted at a moisture content at or above the optimum moisture content as determined by ASTM D 1557. 6.1.3 When the moisture content of soil fill is below that specified by the Consultant, water shall be added by the Contractor until the moisture content is in the range specified. 6.1.4 When the moisture content of the soil fill is above the range specified by the Consultant or too wet to achieve proper compaction, the soil fill shall be aerated by the Contractor by blading/mixing, or other satisfactory methods until the moisture content is within the range specified. 6.1.5 After each layer has been placed, mixed, and spread evenly, it shall be thoroughly compacted by the Contractor to a relative compaction of at least 90 percent. Relative compaction is defined as the ratio (expressed in percent) of the in-place dry density of the compacted fill to the maximum laboratory dry density as determined in accordance with ASTM D 1557. Compaction shall be continuous over the entire area, and compaction equipment shall make sufficient passes so that the specified minimum relative compaction has been achieved throughout the entire fill. GI rev. 07/2015 6.1.6 Where practical, soils having an Expansion Index greater than 50 should be placed at least 3 feet below finish pad grade and should be compacted at a moisture content generally 2 to 4 percent greater than the optimum moisture content for the material. 6.1.7 Properly compacted soil fill shall extend to the design surface of fill slopes. To achieve proper compaction, it is recommended that fill slopes be over -built by at least 3 feet and then cut to the design grade. This procedure is considered preferable to track -walking of slopes, as described in the following paragraph. 6.1.8 As an alternative to over -building of slopes, slope faces may be back -rolled with a heavy-duty loaded sheepsfoot or vibratory roller at maximum 4 -foot fill height intervals. Upon completion, slopes should then be track -walked with a D-8 dozer or similar equipment, such that a dozer track covers all slope surfaces at least twice. 6.2 Soil -rock fill, as defined in Paragraph 3.1.2, shall be placed by the Contractor in accordance with the following recommendations: 6.2.1 Rocks larger than 12 inches but less than 4 feet in maximum dimension may be incorporated into the compacted soil fill, but shall be limited to the area measured 15 feet minimum horizontally from the slope face and 5 feet below finish grade or 3 feet below the deepest utility, whichever is deeper. 6.2.2 Rocks or rock fragments up to 4 feet in maximum dimension may either be individually placed or placed in windrows. Under certain conditions, rocks or rock fragments up to 10 feet in maximum dimension may be placed using similar methods. The acceptability of placing rock materials greater than 4 feet in maximum dimension shall be evaluated during grading as specific cases arise and shall be approved by the Consultant prior to placement. 6.2.3 For individual placement, sufficient space shall be provided between rocks to allow for passage of compaction equipment. 6.2.4 For windrow placement, the rocks should be placed in trenches excavated in properly compacted soil fill. Trenches should be approximately 5 feet wide and 4 feet deep in maximum dimension. The voids around and beneath rocks should be filled with approved granular soil having a Sand Equivalent of 30 or greater and should be compacted by flooding. Windrows may also be placed utilizing an "open -face" method in lieu of the trench procedure, however, this method should first be approved by the Consultant. GI rev. 07/2015 6.2.5 Windrows should generally be parallel to each other and may be placed either parallel to or perpendicular to the face of the slope depending on the site geometry. The minimum horizontal spacing for windrows shall be 12 feet center -to -center with a 5 -foot stagger or offset from lower courses to next overlying course. The minimum vertical spacing between windrow courses shall be 2 feet from the top of a lower windrow to the bottom of the next higher windrow. 6.2.6 Rock placement, fill placement and flooding of approved granular soil in the windrows should be continuously observed by the Consultant. 6.3 Rock fills, as defined in Section 3.1.3, shall be placed by the Contractor in accordance with the following recommendations: 6.3.1 The base of the rock fill shall be placed on a sloping surface (minimum slope of 2 percent). The surface shall slope toward suitable subdrainage outlet facilities. The rock fills shall be provided with subdrains during construction so that a hydrostatic pressure buildup does not develop. The subdrains shall be permanently connected to controlled drainage facilities to control post -construction infiltration of water. 6.3.2 Rock fills shall be placed in lifts not exceeding 3 feet. Placement shall be by rock trucks traversing previously placed lifts and dumping at the edge of the currently placed lift. Spreading of the rock fill shall be by dozer to facilitate seating of the rock. The rock fill shall be watered heavily during placement. Watering shall consist of water trucks traversing in front of the current rock lift face and spraying water continuously during rock placement. Compaction equipment with compactive energy comparable to or greater than that of a 20 -ton steel vibratory roller or other compaction equipment providing suitable energy to achieve the required compaction or deflection as recommended in Paragraph 6.3.3 shall be utilized. The number of passes to be made should be determined as described in Paragraph 6.3.3. Once a rock fill lift has been covered with soil fill, no additional rock fill lifts will be permitted over the soil fill. 6.3.3 Plate bearing tests, in accordance with ASTM D 1196, may be performed in both the compacted soil fill and in the rock fill to aid in determining the required minimum number of passes of the compaction equipment. If performed, a minimum of three plate bearing tests should be performed in the properly compacted soil fill (minimum relative compaction of 90 percent). Plate bearing tests shall then be performed on areas of rock fill having two passes, four passes and six passes of the compaction equipment, respectively. The number of passes required for the rock fill shall be determined by comparing the results of the plate bearing tests for the soil fill and the rock fill and by evaluating the deflection GI rev. 07/2015 variation with number of passes. The required number of passes of the compaction equipment will be performed as necessary until the plate bearing deflections are equal to or less than that determined for the properly compacted soil fill. In no case will the required number of passes be less than two. 6.3.4 A representative of the Consultant should be present during rock fill operations to observe that the minimum number of "passes" have been obtained, that water is being properly applied and that specified procedures are being followed. The actual number of plate bearing tests will be determined by the Consultant during grading. 6.3.5 Test pits shall be excavated by the Contractor so that the Consultant can state that, in their opinion, sufficient water is present and that voids between large rocks are properly filled with smaller rock material. In-place density testing will not be required in the rock fills. 6.3.6 To reduce the potential for "piping" of fines into the rock fill from overlying soil fill material, a 2 -foot layer of graded filter material shall be placed above the uppermost lift of rock fill. The need to place graded filter material below the rock should be determined by the Consultant prior to commencing grading. The gradation of the graded filter material will be determined at the time the rock fill is being excavated. Materials typical of the rock fill should be submitted to the Consultant in a timely manner, to allow design of the graded filter prior to the commencement of rock fill placement. 6.3.7 Rock fill placement should be continuously observed during placement by the Consultant. 7. SUBDRAINS 7.1 The geologic units on the site may have permeability characteristics and/or fracture systems that could be susceptible under certain conditions to seepage. The use of canyon subdrains may be necessary to mitigate the potential for adverse impacts associated with seepage conditions. Canyon subdrains with lengths in excess of 500 feet or extensions of existing offsite subdrains should use 8 -inch -diameter pipes. Canyon subdrains less than 500 feet in length should use 6 -inch -diameter pipes. GI rev. 07/2015 TYPICAL CANYON DRAIN DETAIL 9' DIA. PERFORATED SUBDRNN PIPE 4 le •M 4 1 NOTES. 1 ....8 -INCH DIAMETER, SCHEDULE SO PVC PERFORATED PPE FOR FILLS IN EXCESS OF 100 -FEET W4 DEPTH ORA PPE LENGTH OF LONGER THAN 500 FELT. 2.....8 -INCH DIAMETER. SCHEDULE 40 PVC PERFORATED PIPE FOR FILLS LESS THAN 100 -FEET IN DEPTH OR A PIPE LENGTH SHORTER THAN 500 FEET. 9 CUBIC FEET / FOOT Of OPEN GRADED GRAVEL SURROUNDED BY MIiAFI 140NC (OR EOUNALENT) FILTER FABRIC NO SCALE 7.2 Slope drains within stability fill keyways should use 4 -inch -diameter (or larger) pipes. GI rev. 07/2015 TYPICAL STABILITY FILL DETAIL NOTES: 1-...DICAVATE SACKCUT AT 1:1 INCLINATION (UNLESS OT ROPI ME NOTED). 2.. _BASE OF STASILMTY FILL TO BE 3 FEET PITO FORMATIONAL MATERIM, SLOPING A MINIMUM S% INTO SLOPE. 3. -STABILITY FILL TO SE COMPOSED OF PROPERLY COMPACTED GRANULAR SOIL 4.....CHILINEY DRAMS TO BE APPROVED PREFABRICATED CTr1MNEY DRAN PA43S (MRADRAN (32CON OR EQUIVALENT) SPACED APPROXIMATELY 20 FEET CENTER TO CENTER AND 4 PEET WIDE CLOSER SPACING MAY SE REQUIRE") F SEEPAGE IS ENCOUNTERED. 5....ATER MATERIAL TO BE 204-IICN. OPEN -GRADED CRUSHED ROCK ENCLOSED M APPROVED FILTER FABRIC (IMAM 140NC). 5.._.COLLECTOR PPE TO BE 4-INOH MINIMUM DIAMETER, PERFORATED, THCK.WALLED PVC SCHEDULE 40 OR EQUIVALENT. AND SLOPED TO DRAIN AT 1 PERCENT MINIMUM TO APPROVED OUTLET. NO SCALE 7.3 The actual subdrain locations will be evaluated in the field during the remedial grading operations. Additional drains may be necessary depending on the conditions observed and the requirements of the local regulatory agencies. Appropriate subdrain outlets should be evaluated prior to finalizing 40 -scale grading plans. 7.4 Rock fill or soil -rock fill areas may require subdrains along their down-slope perimeters to mitigate the potential for buildup of water from construction or landscape irrigation. The subdrains should be at least 6 -inch -diameter pipes encapsulated in gravel and filter fabric. Rock fill drains should be constructed using the same requirements as canyon subdrains. GI rev. 07/2015 7.5 Prior to outletting, the final 20 -foot segment of a subdrain that will not be extended during future development should consist of non -perforated drainpipe. At the non -perforated/ perforated interface, a seepage cutoff wall should be constructed on the downslope side of the pipe. TYPICAL CUT OFF WALL DETAIL FRONT VIEW NO SCALE SIDE VIEW 12. Mia CONCRETE CUT.* WALL a SCUD *WORM ME C MIN. (TYP) PERFORATED SUBDNAIN PIPE •9 C MIN jiYP) NO SCALE 7.6 Subdrains that discharge into a natural drainage course or open space area should be provided with a permanent headwall structure. GI rev. 07/2015 TYPICAL HEADWALL DETAIL FRONT VIEW eases SUICANN 12 NO SCALE NOTE. HEADWALL SHOULD OUTLET AT TOE OF RLL SLOPE OR INTO CONTROLLED SURFACE DRAINAGE NO SCALE 7.7 The final grading plans should show the location of the proposed subdrains. After completion of remedial excavations and subdrain installation, the project civil engineer should survey the drain locations and prepare an "as -built" map showing the drain locations. The final outlet and connection locations should be determined during grading operations. Subdrains that will be extended on adjacent projects after grading can be placed on formational material and a vertical riser should be placed at the end of the subdrain. The grading contractor should consider videoing the subdrains shortly after burial to check proper installation and functionality. The contractor is responsible for the performance of the drains. GI rev. 07/2015 8. OBSERVATION AND TESTING 8.1 The Consultant shall be the Owner's representative to observe and perform tests during clearing, grubbing, filling, and compaction operations. In general, no more than 2 feet in vertical elevation of soil or soil -rock fill should be placed without at least one field density test being performed within that interval. In addition, a minimum of one field density test should be performed for every 2,000 cubic yards of soil or soil -rock fill placed and compacted. 8.2 The Consultant should perform a sufficient distribution of field density tests of the compacted soil or soil -rock fill to provide a basis for expressing an opinion whether the fill material is compacted as specified. Density tests shall be performed in the compacted materials below any disturbed surface. When these tests indicate that the density of any layer of fill or portion thereof is below that specified, the particular layer or areas represented by the test shall be reworked until the specified density has been achieved. 8.3 During placement of rock fill, the Consultant should observe that the minimum number of passes have been obtained per the criteria discussed in Section 6.3.3. The Consultant should request the excavation of observation pits and may perform plate bearing tests on the placed rock fills. The observation pits will be excavated to provide a basis for expressing an opinion as to whether the rock fill is properly seated and sufficient moisture has been applied to the material. When observations indicate that a layer of rock fill or any portion thereof is below that specified, the affected layer or area shall be reworked until the rock fill has been adequately seated and sufficient moisture applied. 8.4 A settlement monitoring program designed by the Consultant may be conducted in areas of rock fill placement. The specific design of the monitoring program shall be as recommended in the Conclusions and Recommendations section of the project Geotechnical Report or in the final report of testing and observation services performed during grading. 8.5 We should observe the placement of subdrains, to check that the drainage devices have been placed and constructed in substantial conformance with project specifications. 8.6 Testing procedures shall conform to the following Standards as appropriate: 8.6.1 Soil and Soil -Rock Fills: 8.6.1.1 Field Density Test, ASTM D 1556, Density of Soil In -Place By the Sand -Cone Method. GI rev. 07/2015 8.6.1.2 Field Density Test, Nuclear Method, ASTM D 6938, Density of Soil and Soil -Aggregate In -Place by Nuclear Methods (Shallow Depth). 8.6.1.3 Laboratory Compaction Test, ASTM D 1557, Moisture -Density Relations of Soils and Soil -Aggregate Mixtures Using 10 -Pound Hammer and 18 -Inch Drop. 8.6.1.4. Expansion Index Test, ASTM D 4829, Expansion Index Test. 9. PROTECTION OF WORK 9.1 During construction, the Contractor shall properly grade all excavated surfaces to provide positive drainage and prevent ponding of water. Drainage of surface water shall be controlled to avoid damage to adjoining properties or to finished work on the site. The Contractor shall take remedial measures to prevent erosion of freshly graded areas until such time as permanent drainage and erosion control features have been installed. Areas subjected to erosion or sedimentation shall be properly prepared in accordance with the Specifications prior to placing additional fill or structures. 9.2 After completion of grading as observed and tested by the Consultant, no further excavation or filling shall be conducted except in conjunction with the services of the Consultant. 10. CERTIFICATIONS AND FINAL REPORTS 10.1 Upon completion of the work, Contractor shall furnish Owner a certification by the Civil Engineer stating that the lots and/or building pads are graded to within 0.1 foot vertically of elevations shown on the grading plan and that all tops and toes of slopes are within 0.5 foot horizontally of the positions shown on the grading plans. After installation of a section of subdrain, the project Civil Engineer should survey its location and prepare an as -built plan of the subdrain location. The project Civil Engineer should verify the proper outlet for the subdrains and the Contractor should ensure that the drain system is free of obstructions. 10.2 The Owner is responsible for furnishing a final as -graded soil and geologic report satisfactory to the appropriate governing or accepting agencies. The as -graded report should be prepared and signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer experienced in geotechnical engineering and by a California Certified Engineering Geologist, indicating that the geotechnical aspects of the grading were performed in substantial conformance with the Specifications or approved changes to the Specifications. GI rev. 07/2015 City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening Appendix E: Water Quality Management Plan December 2016 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Project Specific Water Quality Management Plan A Template for preparing Project Specific WQMPs for Priority Development Projects located within the Santa Margarita Region of Riverside County Project Title: Pechanga Parkway Widening (Via Gilberto to North Casino Drive) Development No: PW15-14 Design Review/Case No: Insert text here ❑ Preliminary ® Final Original Date Prepared: August 19, 2016 Revision Date(s): Insert text here Prepared for Compliance with Regional Board Order No. R9-2010-0016 Contact Information: Prepared for: City of Temecula Public Works Attn: William Becerra 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 Prepared by: Francisco Martinez Jr., PE Michael Baker International 40810 County Center Drive, Suite 200 Temecula, CA 92591 951.676.8042 A Brief Introduction The Municipal Separate Stormwater Sewer System (MS4) Permit' for the Santa Margarita Region (SMR) requires preparation of a Project -Specific Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for all Development Projects as defined in section F.1.d.(1) of the Permit. This Project -Specific WQMP Template for Development Projects in the Santa Margarita Region has been prepared to help document compliance and prepare a WQMP submittal. Below is a flowchart for the layout of this Template that will provide the steps required to document compliance. Section A •Project and Site Information •Identification of LID and Hydromodification requirements, if any Section F •Alternative Compliance (LID Waiver Program & Hydromodification) Section G •Source Control BMPs Section B •Optimize Site Utilization Section E •Technical Feasibility • Implement Hydromodification BMPs Section H • Operation, Maintenance, and Funding Section C • Delineate Drainage Management Areas (DMAs) Section D •Technical Feasibility • Implement LID BMPs 1 Order No. R9-2010-0016, NPDES No. CAS0108766, Waste Discharge Requirements for Discharges from the MS4 Draining the County of Riverside, the Incorporated Cities of Riverside County, and the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District within the San Diego Region, California Regional Water Quality Control Board, November 10, 2010. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Pechanga Parkway Widening OWNER'S CERTIFICATION This Project -Specific WQMP has been prepared for the City of Temecula by Michael Baker International Company for the Pechanga Parkway Widening project. This WQMP is intended to comply with the requirements of the City of Temecula for Municipal Code 8.28.500 which includes the requirement for the preparation and implementation of a Project -Specific WQMP. The undersigned, while owning the property/project described in the preceding paragraph, shall be responsible for the implementation and funding of this WQMP and will ensure that this WQMP is amended as appropriate to reflect up-to-date conditions on the site. In addition, the property owner accepts responsibility for interim operation and maintenance of Stormwater Best Management Practices until such time as this responsibility is formally transferred to a subsequent owner. This WQMP will be reviewed with the facility operator, facility supervisors, employees, tenants, maintenance and service contractors, or any other party (or parties) having responsibility for implementing portions of this WQMP. At least one copy of this WQMP will be maintained at the project site or project office in perpetuity. The undersigned is authorized to certify and to approve implementation of this WQMP. The undersigned is aware that implementation of this WQMP is enforceable under City of Temecula Water Quality Ordinance (Municipal Code Section 8.28.500). "I, the undersigned, certify under penalty of law that the provisions of this WQMP have been reviewed and accepted and that the WQMP will be transferred to future successors in interest." Owner's Signature Date Owner's Printed Name Owner's Title/Position PREPARER'S CERTIFICATION "The selection, sizing and design of stormwater treatment and other stormwater quality and quantity control Best Management Practices in this plan meet the requirements of Regional Water Quality Control Board Order No. R9- 2010-0016 and any subsequent amendments thereto." Preparer's Signature Date Francisco Martinez Jr. Proiect Manager Preparer's Printed Name Preparer's Title/Position Preparer's Licensure: -3- Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Pechanga Parkway Widening Table of Contents Section A: Project and Site Information 6 A.1 Maps and Site Plans 6 A.2 Identify Receiving Waters 7 A.3 Drainage System Susceptibility to Hydromodification 7 A.4 Additional Permits/Approvals required for the Project: 8 Section B: Optimize Site Utilization (LID Principles) 9 Section C: Delineate Drainage Management Areas (DMAs) 10 Section D: Implement LID BMPs 12 D.1 Infiltration Applicability 12 D.2 Harvest and Use Assessment 14 D.3 Bioretention and Biotreatment Assessment 16 D.4 Other Limiting Geotechnical Conditions 17 D.5 Feasibility Assessment Summaries 17 D.6 LID BMP Sizing 18 Section E: Implement Hydrologic Control BMPs and Sediment Supply BMPs 21 E.1 Onsite Feasibility of Hydrologic Control BMPs 21 E.2 Meeting the HMP Performance Standard for Small Project Sites 21 E.3 Hydrologic Control BMP Selection 22 E.4 Hydrologic Control BMP Sizing 24 E.5 Implement Sediment Supply BMPs 24 Section F: Alternative Compliance 27 F.1 Identify Pollutants of Concern 29 F.2 Stormwater Credits 30 F.3 Sizing Criteria 30 F.4 Treatment Control BMP Selection 31 F.5 Hydrologic Performance Standard — Alternative Compliance Approach 31 F.6 Sediment Supply Performance Standard - Alternative Compliance 32 Section G: Source Control BMPs 33 Section H: Construction Plan Checklist 34 Section I: Operation, Maintenance and Funding 35 Acronyms, Abbreviations and Definitions 36 -4- Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Pechanga Parkway Widening List of Tables Table A.1 Identification of Receiving Waters 7 Table A.2 Identification of Susceptibility to Hydromodification 8 Table A.3 Other Applicable Permits 8 Table C.1 DMA Classifications 10 Table C.2 Type 'A', Self -Treating Areas 10 Table C.3 Type 'B', Self -Retaining Areas 10 Table C.4 Type 'C', Areas that Drain to Self -Retaining Areas 11 Table C.5 Type 'D', Areas Draining to BMPs 11 Table D.1 Infiltration Feasibility 12 Table D.2 Geotechnical Concerns for Onsite Retention Table 17 Table D.3 LID Prioritization Summary Matrix 17 Table D.4 DCV Calculations for LID BMPs Error! Bookmark not defined. Table D.5 LID BMP Sizing 20 Table E.1 LID & Hydromodification BMP Location 22 Table E.2 Hydrologic Control BMP Sizing 24 Table F.1 Potential Pollutants by Land Use Type 29 Table F.2 Stormwater Credits 30 Table F.3 Treatment Control BMP Sizing 30 Table F.4 Treatment Control BMP Selection 31 Table F.5 Offsite Hydrologic Control BMP Sizing 32 Table G.1 Structural and Operational Source Control BMP 33 Table H.1 Construction Plan Cross-reference 34 List of Appendices Appendix 1: Maps and Site Plans 43 Appendix 2: Construction Plans 44 Appendix 3: Soils Information 45 Appendix 4: Historical Site Conditions 46 Appendix 5: LID Infeasibility 47 Appendix 6: BMP Design Details 48 Appendix 7: Hydromodification 49 Appendix 8: Source Control 50 Appendix 9: O&M 51 Appendix 10: Educational Materials 43 -5- Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Pechanga Parkway Widening -7- Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Pechanga Parkway Widening Section A: Project and Site Information PROJECT INFORMATION Type of Project: Planning Area: Community Name: Development Name: PROJECT LOCATION Latitude & Longitude (DMS): 33° 27' 34.5", 117° 6' 27.6" Project Watershed and Sub -Watershed: Pechanga HA, Wolf HSA Street Widening XXX Insert text here Pechanga Parkway Widening APN(s): City right-of-way Map Book and Page No.: Insert text here PROJECT CHARACTERISTICS Proposed or potential land use(s) Proposed or Potential SIC Code(s) Area of Impervious Project Footprint (SF) Total area of proposed Impervious Surfaces within the Project Limits (SF)/or Replacement Total Project Area (ac) Does the project consist of offsite road improvements? Does the project propose to construct unpaved roads? Is the project part of a larger common plan of development (phased project)? Is the project exempt from HMP Performance Standards? EXISTING SITE CHARACTERISTICS Total area of existing Impervious Surfaces within the project limits (SF) Is the project located within any Multi -Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP Criteria Cell? If so, identify the Cell number: Are there any natural hydrologic features on the project site? Is a Geotechnical Report attached? If no Geotech. Report, list the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) soils type(s) present on the site (A, B, C and/or D) What is the Water Quality Design Storm Depth for the project? Street Insert text here 322,300 SF 30,430 SF 7.4 AC ❑ Y ❑ Y Y ®Y N ® N N N 291,870 SF ❑Y ®N N/A Y ❑N Y ®N A,C 0.95 A.1 Maps and Site Plans When completing your Project -Specific WQMP, include a map of the Project vicinity and existing site. In addition, include all grading, drainage, landscape/plant palette and other pertinent construction plans in Appendix 2. At a minimum, your WQMP Site Plan should include the following: • Drainage Management Areas (DMAs) • Proposed Structural Best Management Practices (BMPs) • Drainage Path -6- • Source Control BMPs • Buildings, Roof Lines, Downspouts • Impervious Surfaces • Standard Labeling Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Pechanga Parkway Widening • Drainage infrastructure, inlets, overflows Use your discretion on whether or not you may need to create multiple sheets or can appropriately accommodate these features on one or two sheets. Keep in mind that the Copermittee plan reviewer must be able to easily analyze your Project utilizing this template and its associated site plans and maps. A.2 Identify Receiving Waters Using Table A.1 below, list in order of upstream to downstream, the Receiving Waters that the Project site is tributary to. Continue to fill each row with the Receiving Water's 303(d) listed impairments (if any), designated Beneficial Uses, and proximity, if any, to a RARE Beneficial Use. Include a map of the Receiving Waters in Appendix 1. (http:i+dill'.waterhoards.ca.gov/sandiego-water issues program' hasinplan ) Table A.1 Identification of Receiving Waters Receiving Waters USEPA Approved 303(d) List Impairments Designated Beneficial Uses Proximity to RARE Beneficial Use Wolf Valley Creek (HAS 2.52) None None Temecula Creek (HAS 2.52) Pesticides (Chlorpyrifos); Metals (Copper), Nutrients(Phosphorus), Salinity(TDS), Toxicity (Toxicity) MUN, AGR, IND, PROC, GWR, REC- 1, REC-2, WARM, WILD Santa Margarita River — Upper Portion (Deluz HAS 2.22 2 21) Nutrients (Phosphorus), Toxicity (Toxicity) MUN, AGR, IND, REC-1, REC-2, WARM, COLD, WILD, RARE, SPWN Santa Margarita River — Lower Portion (Ysidora, HAS 2.13, 2.12, 2.11) Bacteria & Viruses (Enterococcus, Fecal Coliform), Nutrients (Phosphorus, Nitrogen) MUN, AGR, IND, PROC, REC-1, REC- 2, WARM, COLD, WILD, RARE Santa Margarita Lagoon Nutrients (Eutrophic) REC-1, REC-2, EST, WILD, RARE, MAR, MIGR, SPWN Pacific Ocean None IND, NAV, REC-1, REC-2, COMM, BIOL, WILD, RARE, MAR, AQUA, MIGR, SPWN, SHELL A.3 Drainage System Susceptibility to Hydromodification Using Table A.2 below, list in order of the point of discharge at the project site down to the Santa Margarita River, each drainage system or receiving water that the project site is tributary to. Continue to fill each row with the material of the drainage system, the storm drain susceptibility using the SWCT2 (Stormwater & Water Conservation Tracking Tool - http://rivco.permitrack.com/) or Map 2 of the Hydromodification Susceptibility Documentation Report and Mapping: Santa Margarita Region (Appendix D of the SMR HMP), and the condition for exempting the drainage system, if applicable. If the exemption includes receiving waters that were not evaluated in Appendix D, provide supporting documentation in Appendix 7 to demonstrate that they classify as Engineered, Fully Hardened and Maintained (EFHM) channels, consistent with the definition provided in Appendix D. Include a map exhibiting each drainage system and the associated susceptibility in Appendix 1. -7- Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Pechanga Parkway Widening Table A.2 Identification of Susceptibility to Hydromodification Drainage System Drainage System Material Susceptibility of Drainage System Hydromodification Exemption Street Curb Inlets and Existing Storm Drain RCP pipes Non Susceptible Concrete Lined Wolf Valley Creek Channel Reinforced Grass Lined Non Susceptible Artificially Harden Channel Triple 14"W x 7' H RCB Concrete Non Susceptible Concrete Lined Temecula Creek Natural Earthen Non Susceptible Large River Reach exemption Murrieta Creek Earthen Susceptible & Non Susceptible Large River Reach exemption Santa Margarita River Natural Earthen Non Susceptible Large River Reach exemption A.4 Additional Permits/Approvals required for the Project: Table A.3 Other Applicable Permits Agency Permit Required State Department of Fish and Game, 1602 Streambed Alteration Agreement ❑ Y ►ZI N State Water Resources Control Board, Clean Water Act Section 401 Water Quality Certification ❑ Y I N US Army Corps of Engineers, Clean Water Act Section 404 Permit ❑ Y N US Fish and Wildlife, Endangered Species Act Section 7 Biological Opinion ❑ Y N Statewide Construction General Permit Coverage ❑ N Y Statewide Industrial General Permit Coverage ❑ Y L N Western Riverside MSHCP Consistency Approval (e.g., JPR, DBESP) ❑ Y ►1 N Other (please list in the space below as required) ❑ Y ►ZI N If yes is answered to any of the questions above, the Copermittee may require proof of approval/coverage from those agencies as applicable including documentation of any associated requirements that may affect this Project -Specific WQMP. -8- Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Pechanga Parkway Widening Section B: Optimize Site Utilization (LID Principles) Review of the information collected in Section 'A' will aid in identifying the principal constraints on site design and selection of LID BMPs as well as opportunities to reduce imperviousness and incorporate LID Principles into the site and landscape design. For example, constraints might include impermeable soils, high groundwater, groundwater pollution or contaminated soils, steep slopes, geotechnical instability, high-intensity land use, heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic, utility locations or safety concerns. Opportunities might include existing natural areas, low areas, oddly configured or otherwise unbuildable parcels, easements and landscape amenities including open space and buffers (which can double as locations for LID Bioretention BMPs), and differences in elevation (which can provide hydraulic head). Prepare a brief narrative for each of the site optimization strategies described below. This narrative will help you as you proceed with your Low Impact Development (LID) design and explain your design decisions to others. The 2010 SMR MS4 Permit further requires that LID Retention BMPs (Infiltration Only or Harvest and Use) be used unless it can be shown that those BMPs are infeasible. Therefore, it is important that your narrative identify and justify if there are any constraints that would prevent the use of those categories of LID BMPs. Similarly, you should also note opportunities that exist which will be utilized during project design. Upon completion of identifying Constraints and Opportunities, include these on your WQMP Site plan in Appendix 1. Site Optimization The following questions are based upon Section 3.2 of the WQMP Guidance Document. Review of the WQMP Guidance Document will help you determine how best to optimize your site and subsequently identify opportunities and/or constraints, and document compliance. Did you identify and preserve existing drainage patterns? If so, how? If not, why? Yes. Drainage patterns will be conserved. Did you identify and protect existing vegetation? If so, how? If not, why? No. Due to the nature of the street widening project existing landscaped areas will be removed and replaced. The project section of Pechanga Parkway is currently a 4 -lane major road which will be widen to 6 -lanes. When Pechanga Parkway was constructed the native vegetation in the area was removed and replaced with irrigated landscape Did you identify and preserve natural infiltration capacity? If so, how? If not, why? No. Pechanga Parkway widening limits have previously been disturbed and compacted. Did you identify and minimize impervious area? If so, how? If not, why? Yes. Minimized width of median when feasible. Did you identify and disperse runoff to adjacent pervious areas? If so, how? If not, why? No. As this project is a street widening project we maintaining existing drainage patterns which do not disperse runoff to pervious areas. -9- Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Pechanga Parkway Widening Section C: Delineate Drainage Management Areas (DMAs) Utilizing the procedure in Section 3.3 of the WQMP Guidance Document which discusses the methods of delineating and mapping your project site into individual DMAs, complete Table C.1 below to appropriately categorize the types of classification (e.g., Type A, Type B, etc.) per DMA for your Project site. Upon completion of this table, this information will then be used to populate and tabulate the corresponding tables for their respective DMA classifications. Table C.1 DMA Classifications DMA Name or Identification Surface Type(s)' Area (Sq. Ft.) DMA Type DMA 1 Asphalt, Concrete 244,330 D DMA 2 Asphalt, Concrete 64,860 D DMA 3 Asphalt, Concrete 75,930 D DMA 4 Asphalt, Concrete 260,500 D DMA 5 Asphalt, Concrete 320,860 D 'Reference Table 2-1 in the WQMP Guidance Document to populate this column Table C.2 Type 'A', Self -Treating Areas DMA Name or Identification N/A Area (Sq. Ft.) Stabilization Type Irrigation Type (if any) Table C.3 Type 'B', Self -Retaining Areas Self -Retaining Area Type 'C' DMAs that are draining to the Self -Retaining Area DMA Name/ ID post project surface type Area (square feet) Storm Depth (inches) DMA Name / ID [C] from Table C.4 = Required Retention Depth (inches) [A] [8] [C] [D] N/A [D] = [B] + [B] ' [C] [A] - 10 - Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Pechanga Parkway Widening Table C.4 Type 'C', Areas that Drain to Self -Retaining Areas DMA Receiving Self -Retaining DMA 0 v E z < 0 Area (square feet) Post -project surface type Runoff factor Product DMA name /ID Area (square feet) Ratio [A] [B] [C] = [A] x [B] [D] [C]/[D] N/A Note: (See Section 3.3 of WQMP Guidance Document) Ensure that partially pervious areas draining to a Self -Retaining area do not exceed the following ratio: 2 (Impervious Fraction): 1 (Tributary Area: Self -Retaining Area) Table C.5 Type 'D', Areas Draining to BMPs DMA Name or ID BMP Name or ID DMA 1 Curb Inlet Filter Insert DMA 2 Curb Inlet Filter Insert DMA 3 Curb Inlet Filter Insert DMA 4 Curb Inlet Filter Insert DMA 5 Curb Inlet Filter Insert Note: More than one DMA may drain to a single LID BMP; however, one DMA may not drain to more than one BMP. - 11 - Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Pechanga Parkway Widening Section D: Implement LID BMPs D.1 Infiltration Applicability An assessment of the feasibility of utilizing Infiltration BMPs is required for all projects, except in the following case: ❑ Harvest and Use BMPs will be implemented to address the Design Capture Volume (see the Harvest and Use Assessment below) for all Drainage Management Areas AND the project is exempt from HMP Performance Standards (Proceed to Section D.2 and Section E). If the above box remains unchecked, perform a site-specific evaluation of the feasibility of Infiltration BMPs using each of the applicable criteria identified in Chapter 3.4.1 of the WQMP Guidance Document and complete the remainder of Section D.1. Is there an infiltration concern (see discussion in Chapter 2.3.4 of the WQMP Guidance Document for further details)? ® Y ❑ N If yes has been checked, both Infiltration BMPs and Hydrologic Control BMPs that include an infiltration functionalities may not be feasible for the site. It is recommended that you contact your Copermittee to verify whether or not infiltration within the Project is infeasible. Infiltration near major roadway may create a public safety hazard as structural integrity of roadway section may be compromised due to infiltration. Geotechnical Report A Geotechnical Report or Phase I Environmental Site Assessment may be required by the Copermittee to confirm present and past site characteristics that may affect the use of Infiltration BMPs. In addition, the Copermittee, at their discretion, may not require a geotechnical report for small projects as described in Chapter 2 of the WQMP Guidance Document. If a geotechnical report has been prepared, include it in Appendix 3. In addition, if a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment has been prepared, include it in Appendix 4. Is this project classified as a small project consistent with the requirements of Chapter 2 of the WQMP Guidance Document? ❑ Y ® N Infiltration Feasibility Table D.1 below is meant to provide a simple means of assessing which DMAs on your site support Infiltration BMPs and is discussed in the WQMP Guidance Document in Chapter 2.3.4. Check the appropriate box for each question and then list affected DMAs as applicable. If additional space is needed, add a row below the corresponding answer. Geotechnical report has not been completed at this time, will provide with subsequent submittal. No infiltration is proposed. Table D.1 Infiltration Feasibility Does the project site... YES NO ...have any DMAs with a seasonal high groundwater mark shallower than 10 feet? If Yes, list affected DMAs: - 12 - Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Pechanga Parkway Widening ...have any DMAs located within 100 feet of a water supply well? If Yes, list affected DMAs: ...have any areas identified by the geotechnical report as posing a public safety risk where infiltration of stormwater could have a negative impact? If Yes, list affected DMAs: ...have measured in-situ infiltration rates of less than 1.6 inches / hour? If Yes, list affected DMAs: ...have significant cut and/or fill conditions that would preclude in-situ testing of infiltration rates at the final infiltration surface? If Yes, list affected DMAs: ...have any contaminated groundwater plume in the vicinity of the site? If Yes, list affected DMAs: ...geotechnical report identifies other site-specific factors that would preclude effective and safe infiltration? Describe here: If you answered "Yes" to any of the questions above for any DMA, Infiltration BMPs should not be used for those DMAs and you should proceed to the assessment for Harvest and Use below. - 13 - Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Pechanga Parkway Widening D.2 Harvest and Use Assessment Please check what applies: ® Reclaimed water will be used for the non -potable water demands for the Project. ❑Downstream water rights may be impacted by Harvest and Use as approved by the Regional Board (verify with the Copermittee). ❑The Design Capture Volume (DCV) will be addressed using Infiltration Only BMPs. In such a case, Harvest and Use BMPs are still encouraged, but it would not be required if the DCV will be infiltrated or evapotranspired. If any of the above boxes have been checked, Harvest and Use BMPs need not be assessed for the site. If neither of the above criteria applies, follow the steps below to assess the feasibility of irrigation use, toilet use and other non -potable uses (e.g., industrial use). Irrigation Use Feasibility Complete the following steps to determine the feasibility of harvesting stormwater runoff for Irrigation Use BMPs on your site: Step 1: Identify the total area of irrigated landscape on the site, and the type of landscaping used. Total Area of Irrigated Landscape: N/A Type of Landscaping (Conservation Design or Active Turf): N/A Step 2: Identify the planned total of all impervious areas on the proposed project from which runoff might be feasibly captured and stored for irrigation use. Depending on the configuration of buildings and other impervious areas on the site, you may consider the site as a whole, or parts of the site, to evaluate reasonable scenarios for capturing and storing runoff and directing the stored runoff to the potential use(s) identified in Step 1 above. Total Area of Impervious Surfaces: N/A Step 3: Cross reference the Design Storm depth for the project site (see Exhibit A of the WQMP Guidance Document) with the left column of Table 2-4 in Chapter 2 to determine the minimum area of Effective Irrigated Area per Tributary Impervious Area (EIATIA). Enter your EIATIA factor: N/A Step 4: Multiply the unit value obtained from Step 3 by the total of impervious areas from Step 2 to develop the minimum irrigated area that would be required. Minimum required irrigated area: N/A Step 5: Determine if harvesting stormwater runoff for irrigation use is feasible for the project by comparing the total area of irrigated landscape (Step 1) to the minimum required irrigated area (Step 4). Minimum required irrigated area (Step 4) N/A - 14 - Available Irrigated Landscape (Step 1) N/A Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Pechanga Parkway Widening Toilet Use Feasibility Complete the following steps to determine the feasibility of harvesting stormwater runoff for toilet flushing uses on your site: Step 1: Identify the projected total number of daily toilet users during the wet season, and account for any periodic shut downs or other lapses in occupancy: Projected Number of Daily Toilet Users: N/A Project Type: N/A Step 2: Identify the planned total of all impervious areas on the proposed Project from which runoff might be feasibly captured and stored for toilet use. Depending on the configuration of buildings and other impervious areas on the site, you may consider the Project site as a whole, or parts of the site, to evaluate reasonable scenarios for capturing and storing runoff and directing the stored runoff to the potential use(s) identified in Step 1 above. Total Area of Impervious Surfaces: N/A Step 3: Enter the Design Storm depth for the project site (see Exhibit A) into the left column of Table 2- 3 in Chapter 2 to determine the minimum number or toilet users per tributary impervious acre (TUTIA). Enter your TUTIA factor: N/A Step 4: Multiply the unit value obtained from Step 3 by the total of impervious areas from Step 2 to develop the minimum number of toilet users that would be required. Minimum number of toilet users: N/A Step 5: Determine if harvesting stormwater runoff for toilet flushing use is feasible for the Project by comparing the Number of Daily Toilet Users (Step 1) to the minimum required number of toilet users (Step 4). Minimum required Toilet Users (Step 4) N/A Projected number of toilet users (Step 1) N/A Other Non -Potable Use Feasibility Are there other non -potable uses for stormwater runoff on the site (e.g. industrial use)? See Chapter 2 of the Guidance for further information. If yes, describe below. If no, write N/A. Insert narrative description here. Step 1: Identify the projected average daily non -potable demand, in gallons per day, during the Wet Season and accounting for any periodic shut downs or other lapses in occupancy or operation. Average Daily Demand: N/A Step 2: Identify the planned total of all impervious areas on the proposed Project from which runoff might be feasibly captured and stored for the identified non -potable use. Depending on the configuration of buildings and other impervious areas on the site, you may consider the Project - 15 - Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Pechanga Parkway Widening site as a whole, or parts of the site, to evaluate reasonable scenarios for capturing and storing runoff and directing the stored runoff to the potential use(s) identified in Step 1 above. Total Area of Impervious Surfaces: N/A Step 3: Enter the Design Storm Depth for the Project site (see Exhibit A) into the left column of Table 2- 5 in Chapter 2 to determine the minimum demand for non -potable uses of stormwater runoff per tributary impervious acre. Enter the factor from Table 2-3: N/A Step 4: Multiply the unit value obtained from Step 4 by the total of impervious areas from Step 3 to develop the minimum gpd of non -potable use that would be required. Minimum required use: N/A Step 5: Determine if harvesting stormwater runoff for other non -potable use is feasible for the Project by comparing the Number of Daily Toilet Users (Step 1) to the minimum required number of toilet users (Step 4). Minimum required non -potable use (Step 4) N/A Projected average daily use (Step 1) N/A If Irrigation, Toilet and Other Use feasibility anticipated demands are less than the applicable minimum values, Harvest and Use BMPs are not required and you should proceed to utilize LID Bioretention and Biotreatment BMPs, unless a site-specific analysis has been completed that demonstrates technical infeasibility as noted in D.3 below. D.3 Bioretention and Biotreatment Assessment Other LID Bioretention and Biotreatment BMPs as described in Chapter 2.3 of the WQMP Guidance Document are feasible on nearly all development sites with sufficient advance planning. Select one of the following: ❑ LID Bioretention/Biotreatment BMPs will be used for some or all DMAs of the Project as noted below in Section D.4 A site-specific analysis demonstrating the technical infeasibility of all LID BMPs has been performed and is included in Appendix 5. If you plan to submit an analysis demonstrating the technical infeasibility of LID BMPs, request a pre -submittal meeting with the Copermittee with jurisdiction over the Project site to discuss this option. Proceed to Section E to document your alternative compliance measures. - 16 - Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Pechanga Parkway Widening D.4 Other Limiting Geotechnical Conditions Onsite retention may not be feasible due to specific geotechnical concerns identified in the Geotechnical Report. If any, describe below. If no, write N/A: Geotechnical report has not been completed at this time, will provide with subsequent submittal. Table D.2 Geotechnical Concerns for Onsite Retention Table Type of Geotechnical Concern DMAs Feasible (By Name or ID) DMAs Infeasible (By Name or ID) Collapsible Soil 2. Harvest and use 3. Bioretention Expansive Soil Slopes Liquefaction Other D.5 Feasibility Assessment Summaries From the Infiltration, Harvest and Use, Bioretention and Biotreatment Sections above, complete Table D.3 below to summarize which LID BMPs are technically feasible, and which are not, based upon the established hierarchy. Table D.3 LID Prioritization Summary Matrix DMA Name/ID LID BMP Hierarchy No LID (Alternative Compliance) 1. Infiltration 2. Harvest and use 3. Bioretention 4. Biotreatment 2 ❑ - == _ ==__ _ �I 3 ❑ 4 For those DMAs where LID BMPs are not feasible, provide a brief narrative below summarizing why they are not feasible, include your technical infeasibility criteria in Appendix 5, and proceed to Section E below to document Alternative Compliance measures for those DMAs. Recall that each proposed DMA must pass through the LID BMP hierarchy before alternative compliance measures may be considered. DMA 1— Infiltration, Bioretention, and Biotreatment are not feasible for project as it may create a public safety hazard as structural integrity of roadway section may be compromised. Also, limited right-of-way constraints the used and design of some of these BMPs. DMA 2 — Infiltration, Bioretention, and Biotreatment are not feasible for project as it may create a public safety hazard as structural integrity of roadway section may be compromised. Also, limited right-of-way constraints the used and design of some of these BMPs. - 17 - Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Pechanga Parkway Widening DMA 3 — Infiltration, Bioretention, and Biotreatment are not feasible for project as it may create a public safety hazard as structural integrity of roadway section may be compromised. Also, limited right-of-way constraints the used and design of some of these BMPs. DMA 4 — Infiltration, Bioretention, and Biotreatment are not feasible for project as it may create a public safety hazard as structural integrity of roadway section may be compromised. Also, limited right-of-way constraints the used and design of some of these BMPs. DMA 5 — Infiltration, Bioretention, and Biotreatment are not feasible for project as it may create a public safety hazard as structural integrity of roadway section may be compromised. Also, limited right-of-way constraints the used and design of some of these BMPs. D.6 LID BMP Sizing Each LID BMP must be designed to ensure that the DCV will be addressed by the selected BMPs. First, calculate the DCV for each LID BMP using the VBMP worksheet in Appendix F of the LID BMP Design Handbook. Second, design the LID BMP to meet the required VBMP using a method approved by the Copermittee with jurisdiction over the Project site. Utilize the worksheets found in the LID BMP Design Handbook or consult with the Copermittee to assist you in correctly sizing your LID BMPs. Complete Table D.4 below to document the DCV and the Proposed Volume for each LID BMP. Provide the completed design procedure sheets for each LID BMP in Appendix 6. You may add additional rows to the table below as needed. Table D.4.1 DCV Calculations for LID BMPs DMA Type/ID DMA (square feet) Post- Project Surface Type Effective Impervious Fraction, If DMA Runoff Factor DMA Areas x Runoff Factor Curb Inlet Filter Insert [A] [B] [C] [A] x [C] DMA 1 244,330 Concrete or Asphalt 1.00 0.892 217,942 Design Storm De th p (in) DCV, VBMP (cubic feet) Proposed Volume on Plans (cubic feet) 244,330 217,942 0. 95 17,254 - 18 - Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Pechanga Parkway Widening Table D.4.2 DCV Calculations for LID BMPs DMA Type/ID DMA (square feet) Post- Project Surface Type Effective Imperviou s Fraction, If DMA Runoff Factor DMA Areas x Runoff Factor Curb Inlet Filter Insert B [A] [B] [C] [A] x [C] DMA 2 64,860 Concrete or Asphalt 1.00 0.892 57,855 Design Storm Depth (in) DCV, VBMP (cubic feet) Proposed Volume on Plans (cubic feet) 64,860 57,855 0'95 4,580 Table D.4.3 DCV Calculations for LID BMPs DMA Type/ID DMA (feet)square Post- Project Surface Type Effective Imperviou s Fraction, If DMA Runoff Fact DMA Areas x Runoff Factor Curb Inlet Filter Insert C [A] [B] [C] [A] x [C] DMA 3 75,930 Concrete or Asphalt 1.00 0.892 67,730 Design Storm Depth (in) DCV, VgMP (cubic feet) Proposed Volume on Plans (cubic feet) 75,930 67,730 0.95 5,362 Table D.4.4 DCV Calculations for LID BMPs DMA Type/ID DMA (square feet) Post- Project Surface Type Effective Imperviou s Fraction, If DMA Runoff Factor DMA Areas x Runoff Factor Curb Inlet Filter Insert D [A] [B] [C] [A] x [C] DMA 4 260,500 Concrete or Asphalt 1.00 0.892 232,366 Design Storm DCV, VgMP Proposed Volume on Plans - 19 - Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Pechanga Parkway Widening 260,500 Table D.4.5 DCV Calculations for LID BMPs 232,366 Depth (in) 0.95 (cubic feet) (cubic feet) 18,396 DMA Type/ID DMA (square feet) Post- Project Surface Type Effective Imperviou s Fraction, If DMA Runoff Factor DMA Areas x Runoff Factor Curb Inlet Filter Insert E [A] [B] [C] [A] x [C] DMA 5 320,860 Concrete or Asphalt 1.00 0.892 286,207 Design Storm Depth (in) DCV, VBMp (cubic feet) Proposed Volume on Plans (cubic feet) 320,860 286,207 0.95 22,658 [B], [C] is obtained as described in Section 2.5 of the WQMP Guidance Document [E] is obtained from Exhibit A in the WQMP Guidance Document [G] is obtained from a design procedure sheet, such as in LID BMP Design Handbook and placed in Appendix 6 Each LID BMP must be designed to ensure that the Design Capture Volume (DCV) will be addressed by the selected BMPs. First, calculate the Design Capture Volume for each LID BMP using the'VBMp' worksheet in Appendix F of the LID BMP Design Handbook. Second, design the LID BMP to meet the required VBMp using a method approved by the Copermittee. Utilize the worksheets found in the LID BMP Design Handbook or consult with your Copermittee. Complete Table D.5 below to document the Design Capture Volume and the Proposed Volume for each LID BMP. You can add rows to the table as needed. Alternatively, the Santa Margarita Hydrology Model (SMRHM) can be used to size LID BMPs to address the DCV and, if applicable, to size Hydrologic Control BMPs to meet the Hydrologic Performance Standard of the SMR HMP, as identified in Section E. Table D.4 LID BMP Sizing BMP Name / ID DMA No. BMP Type / Description Design Capture Volume (ft3) Proposed Volume (ft3) Curb inlet filter A 1 17,254 Curb inlet filter B 2 4,580 - 20 - Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Pechanga Parkway Widening Curb inlet filter C 3 5,362 Curb inlet filter D 4 18,396 Curb inlet filter E 5 22,658 Section E: Implement Hydrologic Control BMPs and Sediment Supply BMPs If a completed Table A.2 demonstrates that the project is exempt from HMP Performance Standards, specify N/A of proceed to Section F, if applicable, and Section G. E.1 Onsite Feasibility of Hydrologic Control BMPs An assessment of the feasibility of implementing onsite Hydrologic Control BMPs is required for all projects. N/A Select one of the following: [hies — The implementation of Hydrologic Control BMPs is feasible onsite. (Proceed to Step E.3 and Step E.4) - Or - ❑ No — The project site is larger than one acre and the implementation of Hydrologic Control BMPs is not feasible onsite. (Proceed to Step E.5 and Step F for Alternative Compliance upon approval of the Technical Feasibility Assessment by the Copermittee) ❑ No — The project site is smaller than one acre and the implementation of Hydrologic Control BMPs is not feasible onsite. (Proceed to Step E.2) If the reasons for infeasibility are different from those listed in Section D.1, describe the technical or spatial reasons that preclude the implementation of onsite Hydrologic Control BMPs. If none, write N/A: N/A Approval of the condition for infeasibility, if any, is required by the Copermittee. Has the condition for infeasibility been approved by the Copermittee? ❑Y ON N/A E.2 Meeting the HMP Performance Standard for Small Project Sites Select one of the following: N/A - 21 - Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Pechanga Parkway Widening ❑Yes — The project site is equal to or larger than one acre. (Proceed to Step E.3, Step E.4, and Step E.5) - Or - ❑ No — The project site is less than one acre. (Follow the remainder of Step E.2) Only a Simplified Technical Feasibility Study is required from the applicant. Complete the Simplified Technical Feasibility Study in Appendix 7, which must include, at a minimum, the soil conditions at the PDP, a demonstration of the lack of available space for onsite Hydrologic Control BMPs, an explanation of prohibitive costs to implement Hydrologic Control BMPs, and a written opinion from a Registered Geotechnical Engineer identifying the infeasibility due to geotechnical concerns. Select one of the following: N/A O Yes — Onsite Hydrologic Control BMPs are feasible. (Proceed to Step E., Step E.4, and Step E.5) - Or - O No — Onsite Hydrologic Control BMPs are not feasible per the Simplified Technical Feasibility Study. (Proceed to Section E.5 for Sediment Supply Performance Standard and Section F for Alternative Compliance) E.3 Hydrologic Control BMP Selection Capture of the DCV and achievement of the Hydrologic Performance Standard may be met by combined and/or separate structural BMPs. Similarly, compliance with the two identified requirements may be fully or partially achieved onsite. For each DMA, identify in Table E.1 if the DCV is fully or partially captured onsite, if the Hydrologic Performance Standard is fully or partially met onsite (by using the SMRHM identified in Step E.4), and if structural BMPs for compliance with the LID requirement and the Hydrologic Performance Standard are combined. Table E.1 LID & Hydromodification BMP Location DMA LID BMP Hydrologic Control BMP Combined BMP BMP type and ID 1 ❑ Onsite ❑ Partially Onsite ❑ Offsite ❑ Onsite ❑ Partially Onsite ❑ Offsite ❑ Yes Identify the ID and type of Hydrologic Control BMP to mitigate 1st DMA ' No 0 None I None Required Required 2 ❑ Onsite ❑Partially Onsite ❑ Onsite Partially Onsite ❑ Yes Identify the ID and type of Hydrologic Control BMP to mitigate 2nd DMA „ No - 22 - Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Pechanga Parkway Widening For each DMA provide a narrative describing if the DCV and the Hydrologic Performance Standard are to be fully managed onsite. If not, the narrative should detail how and where offsite structural BMPs will achieve management of the DCV and the Hydrologic Performance Standard. DMA 1— Project will cause a public safety Standards, see table DMA 2 — Project will cause a public safety Standards, see table DMA 3 — Project will cause a public safety Standards, see table DMA 4 — Project will cause a public safety Standards, see table DMA 5 — Project will cause a public safety Standards, see table not fully manage the DVC onsite as Infiltration, Bioretention, and Biotreatment may hazard. Also, project has been identified to be exempt from Hydrologic Performance A.2. Although each DMA will be provided with at curb inlet filter insert. not fully manage the DVC onsite as Infiltration, Bioretention, and Biotreatment may hazard. Also, project has been identified to be exempt from Hydrologic Performance A.2. Although each DMA will be provided with at curb inlet filter insert. not fully manage the DVC onsite as Infiltration, Bioretention, and Biotreatment may hazard. Also, project has been identified to be exempt from Hydrologic Performance A.2. Although each DMA will be provided with at curb inlet filter insert. not fully manage the DVC onsite as Infiltration, Bioretention, and Biotreatment may hazard. Also, project has been identified to be exempt from Hydrologic Performance A.2. Although each DMA will be provided with at curb inlet filter insert. not fully manage the DVC onsite as Infiltration, Bioretention, and Biotreatment may hazard. Also, project has been identified to be exempt from Hydrologic Performance A.2. Although each DMA will be provided with at curb inlet filter insert. - 23 - ❑ Offsite ❑ Offsite ❑ None Required None Required 3 ❑ Onsite ❑ Partially Onsite❑ ❑ Offsite n Onsite ❑ Partially Onsite Offsite ❑ Yes Identify the ID and type of Hydrologic Control BMP to mitigate 3rd DMA ISI No � None Required None Required 4 ❑ Onsite ❑ Partially Onsite ❑ Offsite/1 ❑ Onsite ❑ Partially Onsite Offsite ❑ Yes Identify the ID and type of Hydrologic Control BMP to mitigate 3rd DMA No 0 None Required 0 None Required 5 ❑ Onsite ❑ Partially Onsite❑ ❑ Offsite ❑ Onsite ❑ Partially Onsite Offsite ❑ Yes Identify the ID and type of Hydrologic Control BMP to mitigate 3rd DMA -1 No None Required , None Required For each DMA provide a narrative describing if the DCV and the Hydrologic Performance Standard are to be fully managed onsite. If not, the narrative should detail how and where offsite structural BMPs will achieve management of the DCV and the Hydrologic Performance Standard. DMA 1— Project will cause a public safety Standards, see table DMA 2 — Project will cause a public safety Standards, see table DMA 3 — Project will cause a public safety Standards, see table DMA 4 — Project will cause a public safety Standards, see table DMA 5 — Project will cause a public safety Standards, see table not fully manage the DVC onsite as Infiltration, Bioretention, and Biotreatment may hazard. Also, project has been identified to be exempt from Hydrologic Performance A.2. Although each DMA will be provided with at curb inlet filter insert. not fully manage the DVC onsite as Infiltration, Bioretention, and Biotreatment may hazard. Also, project has been identified to be exempt from Hydrologic Performance A.2. Although each DMA will be provided with at curb inlet filter insert. not fully manage the DVC onsite as Infiltration, Bioretention, and Biotreatment may hazard. Also, project has been identified to be exempt from Hydrologic Performance A.2. Although each DMA will be provided with at curb inlet filter insert. not fully manage the DVC onsite as Infiltration, Bioretention, and Biotreatment may hazard. Also, project has been identified to be exempt from Hydrologic Performance A.2. Although each DMA will be provided with at curb inlet filter insert. not fully manage the DVC onsite as Infiltration, Bioretention, and Biotreatment may hazard. Also, project has been identified to be exempt from Hydrologic Performance A.2. Although each DMA will be provided with at curb inlet filter insert. - 23 - Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Pechanga Parkway Widening E.4 Hydrologic Control BMP Sizing Each Hydrologic Control BMP must be designed to ensure that the flow duration curve of the post - development DMA will not exceed that of the pre-existing, naturally occurring, DMA by more than ten percent over a one-year period. Using SMRHM, the applicant shall demonstrate that the performance of each designed Hydrologic Control BMP complies with the Hydrologic Performance Standard. Complete Table E.2 below and identify, for each DMA, the type of Hydrologic Control BMP, if the SMRHM model confirmed the management (Identified as "passed" in SMRHM), the total volume capacity of the Hydrologic Control BMP, the Hydrologic Control BMP footprint at top floor elevation, and the drawdown time of the Hydrologic Control BMP. SMRHM summary reports should be documented in Appendix 7. Refer to the SMRHM Guidance Document for additional information on SMRHM. You can add rows to the table as needed. Table E.2 Hydrologic Control BMP Sizing BMP Name / ID DMA No. BMP Type / Description SMRHM Passed BMP Volume (ac -ft) BMP Footprint (ac) Drawdown time (hr) N/A ❑ E.5 Implement Sediment Supply BMPs The applicant may refer to Section 2.3 of the SMR HMP for a comprehensive description of the methodology to meet the Sediment Supply Performance Standard. Complete the following steps to determine compliance with the Sediment Supply Performance Standard: N/A Step 1: Identify if the site is a Significant Source of Bed Sediment Supply to the receiving channel ❑ Step 1.A — Is the Bed Sediment of onsite streams similar to that of receiving streams? Rate the similarity: ❑ High ❑ Medium 111 Low Results from the geotechnical and sieve analysis to be performed both onsite and in the receiving channel should be documented in Appendix 7. Of particular interest, the results of the sieve analysis, the soil erodibility factor, a description of the topographic relief of the project area, and the lithology of onsite soils should be reported in Appendix 7. Step 1.B — Are onsite streams capable of delivering Bed Sediment Supply from the site, if any, to the receiving channel? N/A Rate the potential: ❑ High ❑ Medium -24- Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Pechanga Parkway Widening ❑ Low Results from the analyses of the sediment delivery potential to the receiving channel should be documented in Appendix 7 and identify, at a minimum, the Sediment Source, the distance to the receiving channel, the onsite channel density, the project watershed area, the slope, length, land use, and rainfall intensity. ❑ Step 1.0 — Will the receiving channel adversely respond to a change in Bed Sediment Load? Rate the need for bed sediment supply: N/A ❑ High ❑ Medium ❑ Low Results from the in -stream analysis to be performed both onsite should be documented in Appendix 7. The analysis should, at a minimum, quantify the bank stability and the degree of incision, provide a gradation of the Bed Sediment within the receiving channel, and identify if the channel is sediment supply - limited. ❑ Step 1.D — Summary of Step 1 Summarize in Table E.3 the findings of Step 1 and associate a score (in parenthesis) to each step. The sum of the three individual scores determines if a stream is a significant contributor to the receiving stream. • Sum is equal to or greater than eight - Site is a significant source of sediment bed material — all on-site streams must be preserved or by-passed within the site plan. The applicant shall proceed to Step 2 for all onsite streams. • Sum is greater than five but lower than eight. Site is a source of sediment bed material — some of the on-site streams must be preserved (with identified streams noted). The applicant shall proceed to Step 2 for the identified streams only. • Sum is equal to or lower than five. Site is not a significant source of sediment bed material. The applicant may advance to Section F. Table E.3 Triad Assessment Summary Step Rating Total Score 1.A ❑ High (3) ❑ Medium (2) ❑ Low (1) N/A 1.B ❑ High (3) ❑ Medium (2) ❑ Low (1) N/A 1.0 ❑ High (3) ❑ Medium (2) ❑ Low (1) N/A Significant Source Rating of Bed Sediment to the receiving channel(s) N/A - 25 - Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Pechanga Parkway Widening Step 2: Preservation of Identified Onsite Channels Onsite streams identified as a Significant Source of Bed Sediment should be avoided in the site design. Check one of the following: N/A ❑ The site design does avoid all onsite channels identified as a Significant Source of Bed Sediment (The applicant may disregard subsequent steps of Section E.5 and directly advance directly to Section F.) - Or - ❑ The site design does NOT avoid all onsite channels identified as a Significant Source of Bed Sediment (The applicant may proceed with the subsequent steps of Section E.5). Provide in Appendix 7 a site map that identifies all onsite channels and highlights those onsite channels that were identified as a Significant Source of Bed Sediment. The site map shall demonstrate, if feasible, that the site design avoids those onsite channels identified as a Significant Source of Bed Sediment. In addition, the applicant shall describe the characteristics of each onsite channel identified as a Significant Source of Bed Sediment. If the design plan cannot avoid the onsite channels, please provide a rationale for each channel individually. N/A Step 3: By -Pass of Upstream Drainage(s) to Preserve the discharge of Bed Sediment Supply to the receiving channel(s) Onsite channels identified as a Significant Source of Bed Sediment Supply should be by-passed the discharge of Bed Sediment Supply to the receiving channel(s). Check one of the following: N/A ❑ The site design does avoid and/or bypass all onsite channels identified as a source of Bed Sediment Supply (The applicant may directly advance to Section F.) - Or - ❑ The site design does NOT avoid or by-pass all onsite channels identified as a source of Bed Sediment Supply (The applicant may proceed to an Alternative Approach, as defined in Section F). Provide in Appendix 7 a site map that identifies all onsite channels and highlights those onsite channels that were identified as a Significant Source of Bed Sediment Supply. The site map shall demonstrate, if feasible, that the site design avoids or by-passes those onsite channels of significant Bed Sediment Supply to the receiving channel(s). In addition, the applicant shall describe the characteristics of each onsite channel identified as a Significant Source of Bed Sediment Supply. If the design plan cannot avoid or by- pass the onsite channels, please provide a rationale for each channel individually. N/A - 26 - Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Pechanga Parkway Widening Section F: Alternative Compliance LID BMPs and Hydrologic Control BMPs are expected to be feasible on virtually all projects. Where LID BMPs and/or Hydrologic Control BMPs have been demonstrated to be infeasible as documented in Section D and/or Section E, respectively, other Treatment Control BMPs or alternative compliance approaches must be used (subject LID waiver and/or HMP alternative compliance approval by the Copermittee). In addition, if supporting documentation demonstrates the infeasibility to implement Sediment Supply BMPs onsite (See Section E.5), the applicant may refer to Section F.5. Check one of the following boxes: O LID Principles, LID BMPs, Hydrologic Control BMPs, and Sediment Supply BMPs have been incorporated into the site design to fully address all Drainage Management Areas. No alternative compliance measures are required for this project and thus this Section is not required to be completed. Or - ❑ LID Principles and LID BMPs have NOT been incorporated into the site design to fully address the LID requirements for all Drainage Management Areas AND HMP Performance Standards are not fully addressed in the following Drainage Management Areas. o The following Drainage Management Areas are unable to be addressed using LID BMPs. A site specific analysis demonstrating technical infeasibility of LID BMPs has been approved by the Copermittee and included in Appendix 5. The following alternative compliance measures on the following pages are being implemented to ensure that any pollutant loads expected to be discharged by not incorporating LID BMPs, are fully mitigated. The applicant should complete Section F.1, Section F.2, and Section F.3, as applicable. o A site specific analysis demonstrating technical infeasibility of Hydrologic Control BMPs and Sediment Supply BMPs has been approved by the Copermittee and included in Appendix 7. Projects less than one acre have completed the Simplified Technical Feasibility Study. The applicant should complete Section F.5 and/or Section F.6, as applicable. List DMAs Here. Or - ❑ LID Principles and LID BMPs have been incorporated into the site design to fully address the DCV for all Drainage Management Areas. However, HMP Performance Standards are not fully addressed in the following Drainage Management Areas. A site specific analysis demonstrating technical infeasibility of Hydrologic Control BMPs and Sediment Supply BMPs has been approved by the Copermittee and included in Appendix 7. Projects less than one acre have - 27 - Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Pechanga Parkway Widening completed the Simplified Technical Feasibility. The applicant should complete Section F.5 and/or Section F.6, as applicable. List DMAs Here. - 28 - Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Pechanga Parkway Widening F.1 Identify Pollutants of Concern Utilizing Table A.1 from Section A above which noted your project's Receiving Waters and their associated USEPA approved 303(d) listed impairments, cross reference this information with that of your selected Priority Development Project Category in Table F.1 below. If the identified General Pollutant Categories are the same as those listed for your Receiving Waters, then these will be your Pollutants of Concern and the appropriate box or boxes will be checked on the last row. The purpose of this is to document compliance and to help you appropriately plan for mitigating your Pollutants of Concern in lieu of implementing LID BMPs. Table F.1 Potential Pollutants by Land Use Type Priority Development Project Categories and/or Project Features (check those that apply) General Pollutant Categories Bacterial Indicators Metals Nutrients Pesticides Toxic Organic Compounds Sediments Trash & Debris Oil & Grease Detached Residential P N P P N P P P Development Attached Residential P N P P N P P pm • Development Commercial/Industrial P(3) P P(1) P)') p(5) p)l) P P • Development Automotive Repair N P N N Po 5) N P P M Shops Restaurants P N N N N N P P • (>5,000 ft2) Hillside DevelopmentII P N P P N P P P (>5,000 ft2) Parking Lots p(6) P p)l) p(l) p)4) P)') P P (>5,000 ft2) N P N N P N P P • Retail Gasoline Outlets Project Priority Pollutant(s) of Concern ® -� ��� J ��� • • • P = Potential N = Not Potential (1) A potential Pollutant if non-native landscaping exists or is proposed onsite; otherwise not expected (2) A potential Pollutant if the project includes uncovered parking areas; otherwise not expected (3) A potential Pollutant is land use involving animal waste (4) Specifically petroleum hydrocarbons (5) Specifically solvents (6) Bacterial indicators are routinely detected in pavement runoff - 29 - Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Pechanga Parkway Widening F.2 Stormwater Credits Projects that cannot implement LID BMPs but nevertheless implement Smart Growth Principles are potentially eligible for Stormwater Credits. Utilize Table 3-7 within the WQMP Guidance Document to identify your Project Category and its associated Water Quality Credit. If not applicable, write N/A. Table F.2 Stormwater Credits Qualifying Project Categories Credit Percentage' N/A Total Credit Percentage' 'Cannot Exceed 50% 'Obtain corresponding data from Table 3-7 in the WQMP Guidance Document F.3 Sizing Criteria After you appropriately considered Stormwater Credits for your Project, utilize Table F.3 below to appropriately size them to the DCV, or Design Flow Rate, as applicable. Please reference Chapter 3.5.5 of the WQMP Guidance Document for further information. Table F.3 Treatment Control BMP Sizin DMA Type/ID DMA (square feet) Post - Project Surface Type Effective Impervious Fraction, If DMA Runoff Factor DMA x Runoff Factor Enter BMP Name / Identifier Here [A] [B] [C] [A]x[C] N/A Design Storm Depth (in) Minimum DCV or Design Flow Rate (cubic feet or cfs) Total Storm Water Credit % Reduction Proposed Volume or Flow on Plans (cubic feet or cfs) A[ 1[A] E= [D] [E] [F] = [D[GJE] [F] X (1-[H]) [1] [B], [c] is obtained as described in Section 2.5 from the WQMP Guidance Document [E] is obtained from Exhibit A in the WQMP Guidance Document [G] is for Flow -Based Treatment Control BMPs [G] = 43,560, for Volume -Based Control Treatment BMPs, [G] = 12 [H] is from the Total Stormwater Credit Percentage as Calculated from Table E.2 above [I] as obtained from a design procedure sheet from the BMP manufacturer and should be included in Appendix 6 - 30 - Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Pechanga Parkway Widening F.4 Treatment Control BMP Selection Treatment Control BMPs typically provide proprietary treatment mechanisms to treat potential Pollutants in runoff, but do not sustain significant biological processes. Treatment Control BMPs must have a removal efficiency of a medium or high effectiveness as quantified below: • High: equal to or greater than 80% removal efficiency • Medium: between 40% and 80% removal efficiency Such removal efficiency documentation (e.g., studies, reports, etc.) as further discussed in Chapter 3.5.2 of the WQMP Guidance Document, must be included in Appendix 6. In addition, ensure that proposed Treatment Control BMPs are properly identified on the WQMP Site Plan in Appendix 1. Table F.4 Treatment Control BMP Selection Selected Treatment Control BMP Name or ID' Priority Pollutant(s) of Concern to Mitigate2 Removal Efficiency Percentage' FloGard Catch Basin insert Filter (curb inlet Style) Bacteria and Virus, Metals, Nutrients, Pesticides, Toxic Organic Compounds 1 Treatment Control BMPs must not be constructed within Receiving Waters. In addition, a proposed Treatment Control BMP may be listed more than once if they possess more than one qualifying pollutant removal efficiency. 2 Cross Reference Table E.1 above to populate this column. 3 As documented in a Copermittee Approved Study and provided in Appendix 6. F.5 Hydrologic Performance Standard — Alternative Compliance Approach Alternative compliance options are only available if the governing Copermittee has acknowledged the infeasibility of onsite Hydrologic Control BMPs and approved an alternative compliance approach. Attach to Appendix 7 the Technical Feasibility Study (Projects equal or greater than one acre) or Simplified Technical Feasibility Study (Projects less than one acre) along with a written approval from the Copermittee. The applicant may refer to Section 2.2.iv of the SMR HMP for extensive guidelines on the alternative compliance approach. Select the pursued alternative and describe the specifics of the alternative: N/A ❑ Offsite Hydrologic Control Management within the same channel system N/A ❑ In -Stream Restoration Project N/A For Offsite Hydrologic Control BMP Option Each Hydrologic Control BMP must be designed to ensure that the flow duration curve of the post - development DMA will not exceed that of the pre-existing, naturally occurring, DMA by more than ten percent over a one-year period. Using SMRHM, the applicant shall demonstrate that the performance of - 31 - Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Pechanga Parkway Widening each designed Hydrologic Control BMP is equivalent with the Hydrologic Performance Standard for onsite conditions. Complete Table F.4 below and identify, for each Hydrologic Control BMP, the equivalent DMA the Hydrologic Control BMP mitigates, that the SMRHM model passed, the total volume capacity of the BMP, the BMP footprint at top floor elevation, and the drawdown time of the BMP. SMRHM summary reports for the alternative approach should be documented in Appendix 7. Refer to the SMRHM Guidance Document for additional information on SMRHM. You can add rows to the table as needed. Table F.5 Offsite Hydrologic Control BMP S'• - BMP Name / Type Equivalent DMA (ac) SMRHM Passed BMP Volume (ac -ft) BMP Footprint (ac) Drawdown time (hr) N/A ❑ n For Instream Restoration Option Attach to Appendix 7 the technical report detailing the condition of the receiving channel subject to the proposed hydrologic and sediment regimes. Provide the full design plans for the in -stream restoration project that have been approved by the Copermittee. F.6 Sediment Supply Performance Standard - Alternative Compliance The alternative compliance option to the Sediment Supply Performance Standard is only available if the governing Copermittee has approved the investigation of alternative Bed Sediment Supply options. Attach to Appendix 7 the Technical Feasibility Study, along with the modeling analysis, the long-term monitoring program, and the potential corrective actions, that demonstrate the performance of the overall alternative compliance program. The applicant may refer to Section 2.3.ii of the SMR HMP for extensive guidelines on the alternative compliance approach. Provide a narrative describing the alternative Bed Sediment Supply approach, including the long-term monitoring program and the findings of the numerical modeling. N/A - 32 - Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Pechanga Parkway Widening Section G: Source Control BMPs Source Control BMPs include permanent, structural features that may be required in your Project plans — such as roofs over and berms around trash and recycling areas — and Operational BMPs, such as regular sweeping and "housekeeping", that must be implemented by the site's occupant or user. The Maximum Extent Practicable (MEP) standard typically requires both types of BMPs. In general, Operational BMPs cannot be substituted for a feasible and effective structural BMP. Using the Pollutant Sources/Source Control Checklist in Appendix 8, review the following procedure to specify Source Control BMPs for your site: 1. Identify Pollutant Sources: Review Column 1 in the Pollutant Sources/Source Control Checklist. Check off the potential sources of Pollutants that apply to your site. 2. Note Locations on Project -Specific WQMP Exhibit: Note the corresponding requirements listed in Column 2 of the Pollutant Sources/Source Control Checklist. Show the location of each Pollutant source and each permanent Source Control BMP in your Project -Specific WQMP Exhibit located in Appendix 1. 3. Prepare a Table and Narrative: Check off the corresponding requirements listed in Column 3 in the Pollutant Sources/Source Control Checklist. In the left column of Table G.1 below, list each potential source of Pollutants on your site (from those that you checked in the Pollutant Sources/Source Control Checklist). In the middle column, list the corresponding permanent, Structural Source Control BMPs (from Columns 2 and 3 of the Pollutant Sources/Source Control Checklist) used to prevent Pollutants from entering runoff. Add additional narrative in this column that explains any special features, materials or methods of construction that will be used to implement these permanent, Structural Source Control BMPs. 4. Identify Operational Source Control BMPs: To complete your table, refer once again to the Pollutant Sources/Source Control Checklist. List in the right column of your table the Operational BMPs that should be implemented as long as the anticipated activities continue at the site. Copermittee stormwater ordinances require that applicable Source Control BMPs be implemented; the same BMPs may also be required as a condition of a use permit or other revocable Discretionary Approval for use of the site. Table G.1 Structural and Operational Source Control BMP Potential Sources of Runoff Pollutants Structural Source Control BMPs Operational Source Control BMPs On-site storm drain inlets See Appendix 8 See Appendix 8 Plazas, sidewalks See Appendix 8 See Appendix 8 - 33 - Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Pechanga Parkway Widening Section H: Construction Plan Checklist Populate Table H.1 below to assist the plan checker in an expeditious review of your project. The first two columns will contain information that was prepared in previous steps, while the last column will be populated with the corresponding plan sheets. This table is to be completed with the submittal of your final Project -Specific WQMP. Table H.1 Construction Plan Cross-reference BMP No. or ID BMP Identifier and Description Corresponding Plan Sheet(s) A WQMP Exhibit B WQMP Exhibit C WQMP Exhibit D WQMP Exhibit E WQMP Exhibit Note that the updated table — or Construction Plan WQMP Checklist — is only a reference tool to facilitate an easy comparison of the construction plans to your Project -Specific WQMP. The Copermittee with jurisdiction over the Project site can advise you regarding the process required to propose changes to the approved Project -Specific WQMP. -34- Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Pechanga Parkway Widening Section 1: Operation, Maintenance and Funding The Copermittee with jurisdiction over the Project site will periodically verify that BMPs on your Project are maintained and continue to operate as designed. To make this possible, the Copermittee will require that you include in Appendix 9 of this Project -Specific WQMP: 1. A means to finance and implement maintenance of BMPs in perpetuity, including replacement cost. 2. Acceptance of responsibility for maintenance from the time the BMPs are constructed until responsibility for operation and maintenance is legally transferred. A warranty covering a period following construction may also be required. 3. An outline of general maintenance requirements for the Stormwater BMPs you have selected. 4. Figures delineating and designating pervious and impervious areas, location, and type of Stormwater BMP, and tables of pervious and impervious areas served by each facility. Geo - locating the BMPs using a coordinate system of latitude and longitude is recommended to help facilitate a future statewide database system. 5. A separate list and location of self-retaining areas or areas addressed by LID Principles that do not require specialized Operations and Maintenance or inspections but will require typical landscape maintenance as noted in Chapter 5, in the WQMP Guidance. Include a brief description of typical landscape maintenance for these areas. The Copermittee with jurisdiction over the Project site will also require that you prepare and submit a detailed BMP Operation and Maintenance Plan that sets forth a maintenance schedule for each of the BMPs built on your site. An agreement assigning responsibility for maintenance and providing for inspections and certification may also be required. Details of these requirements and instructions for preparing a BMP Operation and Maintenance Plan are in Chapter 5 of the WQMP Guidance Document. Maintenance Mechanism: City of Temecula Will the proposed BMPs be maintained by a Homeowners' Association (HOA) or Property Owners Association (POA)? El ®N Include your Operation and Maintenance Plan and Maintenance Mechanism in Appendix 9. Additionally, include all pertinent forms of educational materials for those personnel that will be maintaining the proposed BMPs within this Project -Specific WQMP in Appendix 10. - 35 - Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Pechanga Parkway Widening Acronyms, Abbreviations and Definitions 2010 SMR MS4 Permit Order No. R9-2010-0016, an NPDES Permit issued by the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board. Applicant Public or private entity seeking the discretionary approval of new or replaced improvements from the Copermittee with jurisdiction over the project site. The Applicant has overall responsibility for the implementation and the approval of a Priority Development Project. The WQMP uses consistently the term "user" to refer to the applicant such as developer or project proponent. The WQMP employs also the designation "user" to identify the Registered Professional Civil Engineer responsible for submitting the Project -Specific WQMP, and designing the required BMPs. Best Management Practice (BMP) Defined in 40 CFR 122.2 as schedules of activities, prohibitions of practices, maintenance procedures, and other management practices to prevent or reduce the pollution of waters of the United States. BMPs also include treatment requirements, operating procedures and practices to control plant site runoff, spillage or leaks, sludge or waste disposal, or drainage from raw material storage. In the case of municipal storm water permits, BMPs are typically used in place of numeric effluent limits. BMP Fact Sheets BMP Fact Sheets are available in the LID BMP Design Handbook. Individual BMP Fact Sheets include sitting considerations, and design and sizing guidelines for seven types of structural BMPs (infiltration basin, infiltration trench, permeable pavement, harvest -and -use, bioretention, extended detention basin, and sand filter). California Stormwater Quality Association (CASQA) Publisher of the California Stormwater Best Management Practices Handbooks, available at www.cabmphandbooks.com. Conventional Treatment Control BMP A type of BMP that provides treatment of stormwater runoff. Conventional treatment control BMPs, while designed to treat particular Pollutants, typically do not provide the same level of volume reduction as LID BMPs, and commonly require more specialized maintenance than LID BMPs. As such, the 2010 SMR MS4 Permit and this WQMP require the use of LID BMPs wherever feasible, before Conventional Treatment BMPs can be considered or implemented. Copermittees The 2010 SMR MS4 Permit identifies the Cities of Murrieta, Temecula, and Wildomar, the County, and the District, as Copermittees for the SMR. County The abbreviation refers to the County of Riverside in this document. - 36 - Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Pechanga Parkway Widening CEQA California Environmental Quality Act - a statute that requires state and local agencies to identify the significant environmental impacts of their actions and to avoid or mitigate those impacts, if feasible. CIM I S California Irrigation Management Information System - an integrated network of 118 automated active weather stations all over California managed by the California Department of Water Resources. CWA Clean Water Act - is the primary federal law governing water pollution. Passed in 1972, the CWA established the goals of eliminating releases of high amounts of toxic substances into water, eliminating additional water pollution by 1985, and ensuring that surface waters would meet standards necessary for human sports and recreation by 1983. CWA Section 402(p) is the federal statute requiring NPDES permits for discharges from MS4s. CWA Section 303(d) Waterbody Impaired water in which water quality does not meet applicable water quality standards and/or is not expected to meet water quality standards, even after the application of technology based pollution controls required by the CWA. The discharge of urban runoff to these water bodies by the Copermittees is significant because these discharges can cause or contribute to violations of applicable water quality standards. Design Storm The 2010 SMR MS4 Permit has established the 85th percentile, 24- hour storm event as the "Design Storm". The applicant may refer to Exhibit A to identify the applicable Design Storm Depth (D85) to the project. DCV Design Capture Volume (DCV) is the volume of runoff produced from the Design Storm to be mitigated through LID Retention BMPs, Other LID BMPs and Volume Based Conventional Treatment BMPs, as appropriate. Design Flow Rate The design flow rate represents the minimum flow rate capacity that flow -based conventional treatment control BMPs should treat to the MEP, when considered. DCIA Directly Connected Impervious Areas - those impervious areas that are hydraulically connected to the MS4 (i.e. street curbs, catch basins, storm drains, etc.) and thence to the structural BMP without flowing over pervious areas. Discretionary Approval A decision in which a Copermittee uses its judgment in deciding whether and how to carry out or approve a project. District Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District. DMA A Drainage Management Area - a delineated portion of a project site that is hydraulically connected to a common structural BMP or conveyance point. The Applicant may refer to Section 3.3 for further guidelines on how to delineate DMAs. -37- Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Pechanga Parkway Widening Drawdown Time Refers to the amount of time the design volume takes to pass through the BMP. The specified or incorporated drawdown times are to ensure that adequate contact or detention time has occurred for treatment, while not creating vector or other nuisance issues. It is important to abide by the drawdown time requirements stated in the fact sheet for each specific BMP. Effective Area Area which 1) is suitable for a BMP (for example, if infiltration is potentially feasible for the site based on infeasibility criteria, infiltration must be allowed over this area) and 2) receives runoff from impervious areas. ESA An Environmental Sensitive Area (ESA) designates an area "in which plants or animals life or their habitats are either rare or especially valuable because of their special nature or role in an ecosystem and which would be easily disturbed or degraded by human activities and developments". (Reference: California Public Resources Code § 30107.5). ET Evapotranspiration (ET) is the loss of water to the atmosphere by the combined processes of evaporation (from soil and plant surfaces) and transpiration (from plant tissues). It is also an indicator of how much water crops, lawn, garden, and trees need for healthy growth and productivity FAR The Floor Area Ratio (FAR) is the total square feet of a building divided by the total square feet of the lot the building is located on. Flow -Based BMP Flow -based BMPs are conventional treatment control BMPs that are sized to treat the design flow rate. Fppp Facility Pollution Prevention Plan HCOC Hydrologic Condition of Concern - Exists when the alteration of a site's hydrologic regime caused by development would cause significant impacts on downstream channels and aquatic habitats, alone or in conjunction with impacts of other projects. HMP Hydromodification Management Plan - Plan defining Performance Standards for PDPs to manage increases in runoff discharge rates and durations. Hydrologic Control BMP BMP to mitigate the increases in runoff discharge rates and durations and meet the Performance Standards set forth in the HMP. HSG Hydrologic Soil Groups - soil classification to indicate the minimum rate of infiltration obtained for bare soil after prolonged wetting. The HSGs are A (very low runoff potential/high infiltration rate), B, C, and D (high runoff potential/very low infiltration rate) - 38 - Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Pechanga Parkway Widening Hydromodification The 2010 SMR MS4 Permit identifies that increased volume, velocity, frequency and discharge duration of storm water runoff from developed areas has the potential to greatly accelerate downstream erosion, impair stream habitat in natural drainages, and negatively impact beneficial uses. JRMP A separate Jurisdictional Runoff Management Plan (JRMP) has been developed by each Copermittee and identifies the local programs and activities that the Copermittee is implementing to meet the 2010 SMR MS4 Permit requirements. LID Low Impact Development (LID) is a site design strategy with a goal of maintaining or replicating the pre -development hydrologic regime through the use of design techniques. LID site design BMPs help preserve and restore the natural hydrologic cycle of the site, allowing for filtration and infiltration which can greatly reduce the volume, peak flow rate, velocity, and pollutant loads of storm water runoff. LID BMP A type of stormwater BMP that is based upon Low Impact Development concepts. LID BMPs not only provide highly effective treatment of stormwater runoff, but also yield potentially significant reductions in runoff volume - helping to mimic the pre - project hydrologic regime, and also require less ongoing maintenance than Treatment Control BMPs. The applicant may refer to Chapter 2. LID BMP Design Handbook The LID BMP Design Handbook was developed by the Copermittees to provide guidance for the planning, design and maintenance of LID BMPs which may be used to mitigate the water quality impacts of PDPs within the County. LID Bioretention BMP LID Bioretention BMPs are bioretention areas are vegetated (i.e., landscaped) shallow depressions that provide storage, infiltration, and evapotranspiration, and provide for pollutant removal (e.g., filtration, adsorption, nutrient uptake) by filtering stormwater through the vegetation and soils. In bioretention areas, pore spaces and organic material in the soils help to retain water in the form of soil moisture and to promote the adsorption of pollutants (e.g., dissolved metals and petroleum hydrocarbons) into the soil matrix. Plants use soil moisture and promote the drying of the soil through transpiration. The 2010 SMR MS4 Permit defines "retain" as to keep or hold in a particular place, condition, or position without discharge to surface waters. LID Biotreatment BMP BMPs that reduce stormwater pollutant discharges by intercepting rainfall on vegetative canopy, and through incidental infiltration and/or evapotranspiration, and filtration, and other biological and chemical processes. As stormwater passes down through the planting soil, pollutants are filtered, adsorbed, biodegraded, and sequestered by the soil and plants, and collected through an underdrain. - 39 - Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Pechanga Parkway Widening LID Harvest and Reuse BMP BMPs used to facilitate capturing Stormwater Runoff for later use without negatively impacting downstream water rights or other Beneficial Uses. LID Infiltration BMP BMPs to reduce stormwater runoff by capturing and infiltrating the runoff into in-situ soils or amended onsite soils. Typical LID Infiltration BMPs include infiltration basins, infiltration trenches and pervious pavements. LID Retention BMP BMPs to ensure full onsite retention without runoff of the DCV such as infiltration basins, bioretention, chambers, trenches, permeable pavement and pavers, harvest and reuse. LID Principles Site design concepts that prevent or minimize the causes (or drivers) of post -construction impacts, and help mimic the pre - development hydrologic regime. MEP Maximum Extent Practicable - standard established by the 1987 amendments to the CWA for the reduction of Pollutant discharges from MS4s. Refer to Attachment C of the 2010 SMR MS4 Permit for a complete definition of MEP. MF Multi -family - zoning classification for parcels having 2 or more living residential units. MS4 Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) is a conveyance or system of conveyances (including roads with drainage systems, municipal streets, catch basins, curbs, gutters, ditches, man-made channels, or storm drains): (i) Owned or operated by a State, city, town, borough, county, parish, district, association, or other public body (created by or pursuant to State law) having jurisdiction over disposal of sewage, industrial wastes, storm water, or other wastes, including special districts under State law such as a sewer district, flood control district or drainage district, or similar entity, or an Indian tribe or an authorized Indian tribal organization, or designated and approved management agency under section 208 of the CWA that discharges to waters of the United States; (ii) Designated or used for collecting or conveying storm water; (iii) Which is not a combined sewer; (iv) Which is not part of the Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTW) as defined at 40 CFR 122.26. New Development Project Defined by the 2010 MS4 permit as 'Priority Development Projects' if the project, or a component of the project meets the categories and thresholds described in Section 1.1.1. NPDES National Pollution Discharge Elimination System - Federal program for issuing, modifying, revoking and reissuing, terminating, monitoring and enforcing permits, and imposing and enforcing pretreatment requirements, under Sections 307, 318, 402, and 405 of the CWA. NRCS Natural Resources Conservation Service - 40 - Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Pechanga Parkway Widening pDp Priority Development Project - Includes New Development and Redevelopment project categories listed in Section F.1.d(2) of Order No. R9-2009-0002. Priority Pollutants of Concern Pollutants expected to be present on the project site and for which a downstream water body is also listed as Impaired under the CWA Section 303(d) list or by a TMDL. Project -Specific WQMP A plan specifying and documenting permanent LID Principles and Stormwater BMPs to control post -construction Pollutants and stormwater runoff for the life of the PDP, and the plans for operation and maintenance of those BMPs for the life of the project. Receiving Waters Waters of the United States. Redevelopment Project The creation, addition, and or replacement of impervious surface on an already developed site. Examples include the expansion of a building footprint, road widening, the addition to or replacement of a structure, and creation or addition of impervious surfaces. Replacement of impervious surfaces includes any activity that is not part of a routine maintenance activity where impervious material(s) are removed, exposing underlying soil during construction. Redevelopment does not include trenching and resurfacing associated with utility work; resurfacing existing roadways; new sidewalk construction, pedestrian ramps, or bike lane on existing roads; and routine replacement of damaged pavement, such as pothole repair. Project that meets the criteria described in Section 1. Runoff Fund Runoff Funds have not been established by the Copermittees and are not available to the Applicant. If established, a Runoff Fund will develop regional mitigation projects where PDPs will be able to buy mitigation credits if it is determined that implementing onsite controls is infeasible. San Diego Regional Board San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board - The term "Regional Board", as defined in Water Code section 13050(b), is intended to refer to the California Regional Water Quality Control Board for the San Diego Region as specified in Water Code Section 13200. State agency responsible for managing and regulating water quality in the SMR. SCCWRP Southern California Coastal Water Research Project Site Design BMP Site design BMPs prevent or minimize the causes (or drivers) of post -construction impacts, and help mimic the pre -development hydrologic regime. SF Parcels with a zoning classification for a single residential unit. SMC Southern California Stormwater Monitoring Coalition SMR The Santa Margarita Region (SMR) represents the portion of the Santa Margarita Watershed that is included within the County of Riverside. -41- Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Pechanga Parkway Widening Source Control BMP Source Control BMPs land use or site planning practices, or structural or nonstructural measures that aim to prevent runoff pollution by reducing the potential for contamination at the source of pollution. Source control BMPs minimize the contact between Pollutants and runoff. Stormwater Credit Stormwater Credit can be claimed by an Applicant if certain development practices that provide broad -scale environmental benefits to communities are incorporated into the project design. Refer to Section 3.5.4 for additional information on Stormwater Credits. Structural BMP Structures designed to remove pollutants from stormwater runoff and mitigate hydromodification impacts. SWppp Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan Tentative Tract Map Tentative Tract Maps are required for all subdivision creating five (5) or more parcels, five (5) or more condominiums as defined in Section 783 of the California Civil Code, a community apartment project containing five (5) or more parcels, or for the conversion of a dwelling to a stock cooperative containing five (5) or more dwelling units. TMDL Total Maximum Daily Load - the maximum amount of a Pollutant that can be discharged into a waterbody from all sources (point and non -point) and still maintain Water Quality Standards. Under CWA Section 303(d), TMDLs must be developed for all waterbodies that do not meet Water Quality Standards after application of technology-based controls. USEPA United States Environmental Protection Agency Volume -Based BMP Volume -Based BMPs applies to BMPs where the primary mode of pollutant removal depends upon the volumetric capacity such as detention, retention, and infiltration systems. WQMP Water Quality Management Plan Wet Season The 2010 SMR MS4 Permit defines the wet season from October 1 through April 30. -42- Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Pechanga Parkway Widening Appendix 1: Maps and Site Plans Location Map, WQMP Site Plan and Receiving Waters Map -43- T 01 S T 02 S T 03 S T04S T 05 S TO6S T 07 S T 08 S R 07 W R06W R05W R04W R03W R02W R01W R01E R02E R03E R04E R 05 E 5 MiraLoma 1 LJ 0.68 6. PigeonPass 01-80 0.75 0.7 O a 0.66 MorenoEast 8511 0.85 • Beaumont). 0.88 PradoDam N0.80 • �'....% \0.68 PerrisReservoir 0 90 •'• '0.87' •'.�.� •• . V.istaGrandeGS \�095$ 0.850800 0.750.7 095090 0.7,0 \ SanJacintONWS 0.58 SunCity r. • • 1.11 EICarisoStation` R07W 0.70 ElsinoreNWS 0.77 WildomaWLaCresta +. • SantaRg7 aPlateau 4� Santa Ana River Watershed r �.••.O 075'1..�r� Santa Margarita Watershed 1— 065 \ 6•.. , 0 70 0.65 t. •• 0.65 ; ..1••• Anza • "�: -N- �L: •�• ILI 1.00 TemeculaN 0.65 0, 0 0.80 0.70 R06W R 05 W R04W R 03 W R02V) PROJECT SITE 01 W 0.64 AguangaValley R 01 E 065 R 02 E R 03 E f e Rain Gage Locations RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT Isohyetal Map for the 85th Percentile 24 hour Storm Event July 2011 0 N A S. ..,}v wx.. 8 E R NZ,AjR 01 N o w V. 000 O N A 1. FO /PROJECT SITE } • 2.11 . Michael Baker • RES 14 r -- LEGEND REGIONAL BOUNDARY HYDROLOGIC UNIT BOUNDARY (HU) HYDROLOGIC AREA BOUNDARY (HA) HYDROLOGIC SUBAREA BOUNDARY (SA) FLOW PATH 902 SANTA MARGARITA HYDROLOGIC UNIT 902.1 Yeidora HA 2.11 Lower Ysidoro HSA 2.12 Chappo HSA 2.13 Upper Ysidoro HSA 902.2 DeLuz HA 2.21 DeLuz Creek HSA 2.22 Govilan HSA 2.23 Vollecitos HSA 902.3 Mrrrleta HA 2.31 Wildomar HSA 2.32 Murrieta HSA 2.33 French HSA 2.34 Lower Domenigoni HSA 2.35 Domenigoni HSA 2.36 Diamond HSA 902.4 Auld HA 2.41 Bachelor Mountain HSA 2.42 Gertrudis HSA 2.43 Lower Tucalota HSA 2.44 Tucoloto HSA 902.5 Pechanga HA 2.51 Pauba HSA 2.52 Wolf HSA 902.6 Wilson HA 2.61 Lancaster Valley HSA 2.62 Lewis HSA 2.63 Reed Valley HSA 902.7 Cave Rocks HA 2.71 Lower Coohuilla HSA 2.72 Upper Coohuilla HSA 2.73 Anza HSA 2.74 Burnt HSA 902.8 Aguonga HA 2.81 Voil HSA 2.82 Devils Hole HSA 2.83 Redec HSA 2.84 Tule Creek HSA 902.9 Ookgrove HA 2.91 Lower Culp HSA 2.92 Previtt Conyon HSA 2.93 Dodge HSA 2.94 Chihuahua HSA 40810 COUNTY CENTER DR., SUITE 200 TEMECULA, CA 92591 PHONE: (951) 676-8042 INTERN ATI ON A L MBAKERINTL.COM RECEIVING WATERS MAP FIGURE 2 P\153547-WOMP-FIG02-RECEIVING WATERS MAP.DWG DAVID. ZARATE 5/17/16 2:57 pm W W Z_ J 00 m = < UW W Q(n 150 75 0 150 MINI SCALE: 1"=150' Michael Baker LEGEND a DMA AREA NUMBER AREA IN ACRES DMA BOUNDARY CURB INLET FILTER INSERT DRAIN INLET STENCIL 40810 COUNTY CENTER DR., SUITE 200 TEMECULA, CA 92591 PHONE: (951) 676-8042 INTER NAT 1 0 N A L MBAKERINTL.COM PECHANGA PARKWAY WIDENING WQMP EXHIBIT (1 OF 2) H: \PDATA\153547\CADD\LAND\EXHIBITS\WGMP\153547-WGMP-FI003-DMA MAP.DWG DAVI D.ZARATE 8/23/16 8:31 am W z ZWzk ar _ .�. J J mPECHANGA�PARKWAY ... = m Li _ ,5 CD QW I— W n�nuwunw o�c. �' M [n QV) M 150 75 0 150 NM SCALE: 1"=150' Michael Baker 40810 COUNTY CENTER DR., SUITE 200 TEMECULA, CA 92591 PHONE: (951) 676-8042 INTERNATI 0 N A 1 MBAKERINTL.COM PECHANGA PARKWAY WIDENING WQMP EXHIBIT (2 OF 2) H: \PDATA\153547\CADD\LAND\EXHIBITS\WQMP\153547—WQMP—FIG03—DMA MAP.DWG DAVID.ZARATE 8/23/16 8:33 am Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Pechanga Parkway Widening Appendix 2: Construction Plans Grading and Drainage Plans - 44 - MNERAL NOTES (C(rY CF 1HLESM A) 1 SUMACS- ILL 06 9011. 0665 TO TE Ka170EMS 0 THE OAOR EDITION 6 TIE CITY'S IEO.OpT 5rA0ONM 61MIN8 FOR POEM 00 06711.CTION (MO 960901 11000119). TIE CITY•S 06110176 AAO CONSTRUCTION 66. CITY 0506 MO 700117010115. 2 DumR.1 rR. (060616 MOIRE IS DOT ACCRIAIE). t )ELA WI¢FI10RT 0.01.0.101 RroINAU0001]4I IAT6E-12921EA7 3 wmwll 6011//001 o 1I.AICA TO SHAT 6 MIT 605. A TWINES LICE. 961 E CBT.LIED FAA TE CITY. b. A 670170 PERMIT OWL E OBTAINED. PR161 TO 017 1E6 4 PRIVATE 2050090.1. 111* 06071 MOM 4470000 SO 6 11060 041 7106 661 E PRESENT AT TE .IffiIT: ORIM C0619CTIOO. .. i GR OID$IQ0.. APPROVAL 6 MESE PLANS R DE CITY COES NOT ELIEVE DE APPLICANT MO MINER Cr WOAD FNS TE 6E4661Ea)TY FOR TE OOEECTION 6 00 OR 0095106 0)0000) 0.8)40 C061AC114. 5. 00)06 ILBS_ CITY 001wOCE 70. 6-25 STATES MAT 7O 11650I OWL 081E IN 01 0007 661EC110* ACTIVITY. IES THE 061RICrla SITE IS WITHIN 0E-06RIER ES A OLE ES M 60010 FEST... E1E6 TE '016 C I D PM MO R D M. 10041 0001 FRIDAY AO STALL 0ET 0620 IN GR 0007 061N.CTld ACTIVITY EM DEN TIE H0% 0 7.00 AMMO 10 30 61 0* SANWV. 7O C06TR6TION MTIVITY 9011 E 1717067080E 4 96081 410 MTIOWLY E66126 1010475. 6. 6010100 ABACY CLEARIMEES DE 1594 CE 0 A POSIT 6 TE CITY 003 TOT 110.1 OR 067081E M7 MENACES F. STAT: GR FFDRAL AGENCIES ROOLATINO lE 7/0015106 0 STATE OR 10021 00044 9LCIES CDS 01 M1ER 06ITY 1003.11)06. DE APPROPRIATE 004704/205 FRS TES AGENCIES 96L OBTAINED AICA 10 AMI SITE DISTURB.. OR 1ADi16. I. rAvula(1)0* RN. tlM 0671107)04 0167* NAT E FIRST 20)7100 TO THE CITY A3 A REDLIE 7001516 FOR R*10 1E0 *MOM. RIO TO IWFI08TIM DE OWES IN lE FIELD. 766 TO DE CITY'S 0*140D. MO 06T6Cr1ON 5. ME'm661STT)* 1007106 A PE-006110CTIO1 KEYING 9711 E 9DED0ID TWO OR OATS F601 70 )4 STMT 1 COS METid. 016 0270 01 11ON, A 0)14 AT MO IESF661E .NITACIOR'S WEI ESITATIE STALL E AT THE .A SITE AT ML TIES. 9. Irt rs AH900. 6 TIES PLANS BY TE CIO 063 NOT 06TINIE 0 OYESNATI4 AS TO DE 008ACT 6 CONE7DES 6 TE IODATION, TOR TE (115107* OR 660F)5106E 6 AT 117070006 UTILITIES WITHIN TE AGECT LINI3. MIC 0)1)11 OMBED 00)50 TIE 0611117* 6 THE 705 9WL E EPORED GR 156.400 TO TE SATISFACTION 6 DE OA.61N 06101 BY tit 011MCTR. AT HIS MDSE. 10 9401. IT 9WL E THE 10061BILIO 6 TE 01RACT0 TO 70T)F1 TE 06170 6 EOM MO TO IATA- SUET COR10.1E '0560875, A5 EONIED BY 10161E CONY MINA. M. Mt. 0700.1E T16 SHALL E MMVIOED TO ENGINEER.110 CITYENGINEER.UW CORETI7 6 IK PIM.ECT MO EF0 ICCOMICC IS GRATED. A*) *157116 106601/0 4) (UISDIED GR 0660. 10 710 100 9.0.7 9241 E NOM= 5100 TO CIN STA M. IN 85 07* • TH ESE LAO 966108 ACT MD TE 56003 AO X1001.7 CCOE. AO AS APPROVED BY TE CIN EMINER. UO' EOEST. STVEY ORS STEEDS STALL E PICNIC. TO TE CIN MINER. 11. OOL02071:1. MAST 9088.1 E 016010* BY TATER. d CRIER ETIOS. AS 00)1)D BY ESE CIO EMINR AO 96L 0000 WITH SCUM C067 AIR 001ITT 2402061080 0)510)110'5 (5600) AAL 403. 12.0066007)4 MEM, A 5)2 FOOT MAIM LITE 101E IS MONIED ON ALL 17067701E AO 00021E MNECIS 4TIL 70 505106 ME COREI. GR AS ®ED NECESSARY BY TE CIO DOWER FGR P)BLIC SAFETY. TE MI0TDN0 Cr TE FENCE I5 TE SO2 0061BILIN 6 TE CONTRACTOR. 13. DISEEL112CL. EL WON AA0E0 5)77041 MOR INPEC1101 FIW DE CIN MT E 923 -ECT TO REJECTION. 1.. ODFO 06TRETl3 M1R ETR TO SEPARATE MRS FOR 6601M. 6616 MO SODDEN CON.. PAVING MO TRAT)C 700.1))15. IP AMLICA E. Michael Baker SurrE MEC. 622691 67162 INTERNATIONAL +0600 CMI CITY OF TEMECULA STREET IMPROVEMENT PLAN PECHANGA PARKWAY FROM STATION 86+00 TO STATION 117+00 PROJECT NO. PW 15-14 ROLE VAI_LEY ADAD VIA GIL RTO KILUi.liNMMS COCOON EST, IE .1571 CORNING 0./Q. LITE 100 MARTA, CA 9262 (61) 304-2300 I'LOO+ STREET ENGINEERS S NOTICE TO CONTRACTORS VIA EDUARDO \ I IOEX AAAP MALE 1.0101' DE *15107* MO LD4110 6 MY 610006 UTILITIES OR STRUCTURES 900 01 INGE PLANS NE WADED 6Y KATY. Cr AVAILABLE 00005 MO 10 DE EST 6 OA 009EDE. HERE ME 10 0115TI0 UTILITIES MITT D68 9061 4 0115 RAM. DE C4IRCT3 15 NEW. r0 TME ALL RETMrt10067 049703 to IW7EC1 DE UTILITIES 90701. MD MY Ma LWE9 GR 019.0.00070! 9061 d DEE PATS. MO 15 RESPONSIBLE FR PPOIECTION 6 MO Mr ORAE 10 TEE LINES GR SIACM)IES. L061EC11a C0116R01 6005 THAT IN 4CL0 50. RIIN E00ALLT METRO, 006060TI0 PRACTICES. CONSTA01) N ONTRACTORS WILL E EOUIIm TO ASSUE 911E MO 0110116 IE9661BIL ITT FOR 6 511E 0011106 GRINS TE 4108 6 L661RC1101 6 THIS 6E6. 1.0...0.70 51EETT 6 ML PD606 00 PMPDI7t IMI THIS Ma1EEM SNL VARY 01TIN0EEY MD MT E LIMITED TONIHORS. MO 0CONTRACTOR 04RATHER00 M ES T0. 0 0 10.0 1011(11.10111011(11.4 PI 0, 110.611. MD IND OESI70ESIONL AO mot AMAPA MY PM 410 VAL LIABILITY. MAL GR VALE®. IN OEECTION 610 TE 1 16111WQ 6 ION ON MIS INSECT. TE CONTACT. SHALL E 10066181E 10 10077 0)000016 IM RAN 00/0 FIELD COMM. 1601607 TO DE 06107 00)70070 FOR 11016616 Ala 70 006TRCTI0, MO BELL E E9V61BLE FR D156661E3 160 SD EARED MO EKED. CAUTION TE 00)70 RENNIN DEE RAN RILL MT 1E6 6)61 F61. GR LINE FOR. 6.R16116D OA KRS OR 195 6 DEE RA6. 01 02006 TO of RM6 2466 E IN 61 rim 80 EST E APPROVED FR TE NEPA. Cr TARE -RNC'. SOURCE OF TOPOGRAPHY. D15T104 TOP... 906 4 DEE RM6 585 NO/I. BY KENO AERIE 96E6. INC. CORILE0 FEW AERIE MOTEL.. DAZED 05-15-15. NOR TN CAS IND DRIVE tILIEX OF(Le REEL ®0031 TIRE 9ELr TS, 01671716, ETAI6. 80 TWICE SEOIO6 SHEET )1 70.56 FRS 500. 0.00 - STA 95.6 SWEET 7001001170.16 FIMI STA. 9580 - SIA 01.0 57007 11666*r RA6 HON STA. 10100 - STA 1110 SHEET 160016 PLASMA SIA. 1116 - $IA 112.0 MICE 9CTIOS TRAFFIC SIdE / SIdIN MO SMIPIN LIME 6E7 FA SIGN. 6 STRUNK MA MON 716010 FY FIA OILERR1000611141E1601 I I TRAFFIC SIGNE RMI MONTH PM IN AT MF VALLEY /NIA OPAa 12 TRETIC SIDE RM MOWN PNWAT AT CAIN NIA IRM I3-14 FIFER OPTIC 0 161uDO6 RM MERE 1016 15 FIE. OPTIC 0SMICATI06 RM PC0667 FNM STA. 700 - STA D N FIRS OTIC 10 0* 0SMICAT108 .50 RM ROVE NA./ FRA STA. 0.50 - STA I NNO 17 TIER OTIC *1 1 61116 RAI 70016NTGA IO *Y FRA SU0p . 650 - SIA 121 IFN Ti011C COMACATIO6 RM ETAILS 20 TREY IC CAH. RM BSE OF SEARING) TE EOSINS FOR THIS 9AEY ME EASED 4 IE LITE EIED1 5TAT106 617001 1' MD 7M0 077070 (POSITIONS PER NATION- ERETIC SIRYEY. 640 ELLIPSOID, 0913. EPOCH 105.5) AS 906 d THE MN FILED IN 801 10, PEES 50 TIME. 65 6 RECONS 6 970015 IN THE 6FIE 6 TE 0100 700010ER 6 51406)2* UNIT, FxIFONIA. KIN N 1343'01' W. LEGEND OF 8.0413OLS SYMBOL DISTIM C6706 DISH' ELEVATION RP 6 OAT 0.6701 s- 06E6 IMC 6 arm( 00007E GUTTER MM. ALL RN ENT SECTION 0.10' GRIM MO NERAT O 117671 LITE 166TION 6 PLC. DIST. MTD MIN DIST. 566 DIVING GAS SIIEr LIGHT COLIT16 LIE FEAIMI NO OERLAY C PAUTC 067716 FOCE DISTIFO RIGHT 0 MY LITE 060060 RIGHT 6 WAY LIE TAKEIVICKM 170790 964E FINI1ED GREE RA LIE re. 6Ole FINIS. NNE 11ON MINT 106 POINT RESIN 012 Fs iG re FO LP NC DO ELME . POINT 0 COMM 0.70741E AC RIND 6 K\0E ORR RC 76717 ENTICE 008E MC 00 VOICE 070E EK PEImR TRICE ONCE BEM CARR BASIN TO 6 900 0004.1)0 0OF0 MID7DC1 IN RAE DE 6 RORTY OAB B M0 06 MITTE1 SOD. 6110.1E RIOT 6 MY NNE AIM 0.50 1C MP. 6 6 TS C EES 6 66 CA 5TH V. m, ....••• kin a Tg_ I . 0661RUCTI6 ECM DATE CONTRACTOR W6PECT4 DATE COEIED er 60)5106 DATE TENCH MRI Not ro 676 At TN 1 ESA:Awr. PO 940 041341E As TOTED VERTICAL 0/3 DESIGNED 07 ORAE BY 00000 6 6 A 111.16 000600 VOER TIE 91EI10)514 6 DATE 'RACISM/ MARTO. A. E060QD BD DAM A6V1E0 M: DAm 0)001 A. OMCIA 0110[101 6 PLUG 0016/60 EMIEEM R.C.E..0A CITY OF TEMECULA DEPMDpr 6 PL. IC WOKS 9EE1 NO. 1 S1REET IMPROVEMENT PLAN PECHANGA PARKWAY STA 86+00 - STA 117+00 TITLE SHEET 0199003 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION - 30% SUBMITTAL - 8/19/16 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION - 30% SUBMITTAL - 8/19/16 PAW NOTES (CRY OF TBSEctLA) straw.. 101101A5 (I.C.. +97011 OMT. (r) PA .i, PONT. 0344 mnlr (PCC). MEEL RC.) S COMO TO M 014410 161CIu1106 M REI[ a0 06MACT1* (I.f., 040•000 uOT lDlild, M 0.1003100 NO 0630601* Tv NO 001030 STNOAI. ATO E0.011EM5. 1. egnium 41603. A MOM OR 001.0401 P1001T(S) 001E MAT. MICR 0 MOO ENE OF.ININ3 No DDMNONJ) PI.11. 0 COITIFICATC 6 IaNA1¢ NOT. 001111 M NE 0 MO. (IL 001.00111)AM 11 114)1 E P.IC. TO CIT OLIN. 0 07010)6 100.0•01T ADMIT MT E 101 3. .ARAMOCO SOIL SIMN1m0. LED 0u ME EN¢ 1010 MIM TO MEI. 1. t110-100.. NOE COAT IS TONIED 130 MOM. CR 0[10 N. MME IS 10 SASTMITIO 0611.11* 111.01C (CR 30 100 1110 MOODS W. Er. AC TS P.M). A5 MM. n M 6110 MIN. NO MP.. n M CITY OOIMO. 110 0.1.01* NO A®1N¢ 6 S.M.1300 1.111' 1NY E S ILMO OOT MMMNLT 00E1C MVO P1E0 06361(0). AS OIECOD F MT CITY 001103 M MIM 0141 SID. fE1 E SEPI AT LOSI J TARTS 000141•00 M CITY 00100. S. E0.E0. M M 4814 00.0001. AEIE1IC OES)01 (M NAL) 911E 701110 NOT LE* 1. 14 MTS 401AI0 RAO.. 6 M 0!1011 SAOr10 AID MEL EANL. AT•MIX 60.0O..PES6.A. MOIW.T 0.10 ML 0.1.1 T016000 P. 30 NO 0 OF TN STATE .OMD ECCIf ICATIOO. O. 110.00. • TO06 COAT 101 E .11RI0 10 011710 P0001 NO NOTICES 11013, OOEIE 10100 NO ATa1 DOE. ME CO.. If IT HAS M. OM. 0 g00AAI LOA. MOA 0341 101E STA ETTIM M101C DALSITIFO H7YLT 1030 26-30 0130110 0 M • 0*I5110 N,1 900E MO ME 630E Si.. E =TIT. 0 0 110®100 SONY.. ME 00 AC w1C011N5 1141E 7115140 x..6M WIN DE [4 MOW OW(Dr) *dm 0 n M 63 AvDlr.= CITY 0011. S. P10 S. SCLIMDEMALS a. I. AC NOV I. SEL COW. TO .CTIA 2014 6 M 0 ENCON NO CITY PN010. i. TOE CS P610-10 M 11410 NO 0..03 OSES. MI5 030 10. E A 80)00 6 0.12 MT (1f IMES) 1010* 10,1010 030 NO 015.10610 .0. 11 TRE 9 M00-10 MOLE CONC. MIS COM 101 CONTAIN SC MJA6 IS M EAIED 70703011 0OC1E MIC S. YINNINO. CTTFON M IS 0.31 T (EN) IES). 2. SC 8)800 r 010105MI0)If 0.33 ROT (4 ITO.). 3. M 1WMM r 0 M .06 LIft IS 0.T (41). 1016, NO0'I. ISA TYPE 6 r CRT E C010 n .TRT MES nor 0111 IVO N. IN AAEt. MI N8 COPE4TIM 00.00 301 15 M .. ESA.. ET NI.. OA. ON 1107.1106. CUED n 1)1130 CR .0430130 .0)0700 NESS TO A® 1pIM. M CIT RENNES M RI00 0 4111E A YOIf1m r 05 .SIM POIMPTICS TNT MOVIE NI* 10ILITY (1 ODA° TO !KNITS MO INTIM, Na1AI1 7004301E PARTICLES 030 A 03030.11470¢ TOTILM. ETC.) IN COPLINO RIM M 00.01 NMI ICOO. 90I0CAT100. T. ME 48101303 90LL OPO. 0 10015106 6 M WOO. NOON. CITY PM0046. [. wl*I0 9001E *9. 70040214 ME (CM) CR 48001 030102006 ME (0O1 PD 510106203-1.1 MO NO -1.46 MM.. MI011A NO v.. 7001010163.6 POMO CM. 0.181®9014 IN 003930.6OM OFDmI. D. 1111A-0106. TD TONDO 0,5 0110 TO PANTM. M PIvo= 101 010115) 111 0 0910.1 CR CITY M EYI0 MO 0.314*, M 48)0 0010115) 941 CLEAOT 905 30T M 010... ALL CIT NO CO.. IT. M▪ SELXCLEES. l706T 070..6701 401106 YON 01 PUNS 4 TENTATIVE (I.[.. RET E LED F011001/63 30000). M SOCTIIN 000.1 !101 E W M . n ..611)4 SCA TESTS. OTOT TOON GRADING. M P1LOMA1 ERI* ml* ...E .110. • M.MACOF M CITY 00110. MID 06130 910[ AMOS TO TN 101001.011 0 MM IM 0.0.10 MO Co CAL.. NOON .SIM ILIE M w- T. (1.[., w- 4810 160COOL. DOM. 1.LL E OL. M OLTEST W. P1 NO fWa E IFICS A 40501•0 COIL 60110). M MOO NO 1041106 6 OEM 1030 9301E 11.60 0 MIP`. R M CITY O. 00(0330). M 0 R.mO. 6 ME MIOII4 NO r. OICI SIL! 00110. COM.. .6 03301I* 6 !tr*0 00 MO Sell E 9EII110 O M CIT 00140. JOPACTI1.1 aml0AT* 6 9660E No ME SUE 000143.1. E CCONINTED 11100¢ M TOS 00110 MOM REO NM IM9ECM. 13 PAT. /0001106 a.1 MQ 090 1.91005. OE 1.411* AT 96611E 004(11* (11R 10 RAM.. 6 MEI 1510)10 F M COARSEN. 6 REI. 05101.,lf.,G[13E. 1363 Mv10 11961100 E NMIED n M OP.. 6 REI. OTE (1) MICR 0 PA.. AT ME 0. 0.0101 ND(n0X61.AA..6AC. a. 021300.4 orsirr filIVArE110101021104.1111.4/4 STALL CORY SIMM 0.1.0.0 RUE: MO CITY 310000. ATO 001E INSPECTED 3000()40 n M CIT 00110 MIM O n00. 14.011(1115.Al. 0.510600 0.1•0110 MO 0.045)30,1 E Iw PL. 010 TO Poo. 1l. OlgDE.E0.111L106 4 51 41 DDD. 0041. OMO 0 CITY 000EMS 10 510 . R 10 CITY 51001. '11001#01102 1A1R- M 110)4 ME IAOD1M0/9 110116. IT Do 0DE MM1n1 00 PMEAEL 1O 0)110 1115 MALT 4 L.. P.. 51130 IN M (ENC.. 000 NO Mm LIT). M .DIM SEL 100.0 NO PAVED, At M UISC1Ti* 9 . CIT 061101480 T. AAT 941 DC APPLIED O -01N1415010 ASNAT ODCO BO gDICO S m IN COPLINCE • M I14.51212.1.11401... TONNA 61000.. ECM POEM OSA .0115_LIE. A fA 1101 LIP SEL E RAMO 0.04041 TO OOE1E COTD6 IN 0®000 ON CIT NO 00110)0 5100000. 100 O 4/1000 0. !STALL YO0M 10.1.10 S 4 MOM ES MVOS AODA0 ureed10. UTILITY YAM 0.0. ETC. S., im .0.80 Cm. (MOO. .1100415. UT41T EOE. .0.1163005. CIT AO EOMI1011 STOW.. IDM O CIT 00100 0. 9D PARI) OCTAD 700.440 1)04[4- 0. &pl0Q1. M NET. 0 10o01000. 0151101/11 (I.4.. 0)0 A *50010 01001/6.TIN19N0 EGM) NO 0,111 r 1610.14 Ix.03.1SI0 M 01.•00. O. E>2>Z_ 401544. M 0.1.01E*1 !L 415 0¢ 014 118 LPr11 D6 O MCC *14/1041 6 MOT 01 IIUS ESE 0 n M 41100110. 1 .30" E 010 4.10 1.00. 1110111! 41 M 1•00.1. w VA 101 IN 510 1ET0RPI0. * 6_m. M SEL (0) 11016 1101110. O56 NO (1106. 510006 103040, 02)01 W3N 31.01401604 DOOM CAUSED ST Pol. 0010101 AID 70911E SMT; (0 N•06T 0.1.00 .5¢ MENIOA. 6104 C (1.[ ...6) !101 0 MEY PEES 3045 MIL PA. 0* 163E 00E0 . MATO., (C)1CU. M 1114 (1.4.]1110.4 3000304. 0E1 Ot Al.. PITS. DDA. F. OM°. 6 TMVES AEA. E • r 101 ETC.) 55.ODAID[ONLOaI.6i. ISA 01011E 1016 M 006314, 040110.- MO .351* NO .I10. 0000'.0010005. 403161)0014010000. 1 NTER NATI O N AL 43514 1.0.(85. 000. Michael Baker FASO). DRE MO DITID ()SEWER NOTCH DETAIL Urs win 010• MN. 10001E AC 005.4 0.l0 AE ECA P.M.10 10010•161 COTE 9MIW1 1 TEE 1 IEbL R 30810. PROPOSED MOAN MING MCC 0 PAVEMENT (EXmRn160. Pj !"flQ1 14 OVERLAY JOIN DETAIL NTS CONSTRUCTION NOTES 0 0061141/ O. MO OTTER PER C.0.1. 510. 2a) 0 0611401 5)04030,4 POI C.0.1. 51D. ql 0 061401 CROSS IP1IEN PM C.0.1. STD. 2)0 4 211 0060101 A0)ESS RMP PER C.O.T. 510. 403 COMM ED1..1 010 PER C.O.T. 50. 204 © COMM. 5003104 0410)0)16 MCL IOF 1 PER 8.0. t- 010. 8-3S 0 00670.1 6 1/3' PC P00EN1 OVER 10- C.A.B. p C0611CT OED. RAE PPA MM SIO. 141-3 ® 3O61NC1 IEDIMI TAPER PFA MRA 510. 140-3 ® SAR11T. MIME MO DISPOSE EXISTING 011 NO OJT. ® 58EV1. E101F MO 0190E 0)5°. 51413070 ® 52041, 4101E or. 0)30 Ei15TIP6 MDIIM Dw © 51*T. MOPE NO 01405E .1511. O01 GLITTER ON SAOIT MM O.FRAY PFA DETAIL CO 9(ET ® RELOCATE 0)5TING 511ET LID. ® MT. SWEET LI01T PER C.O.T. STD. 000 MO 003 ® 00670011E 114011 PER CI.Y 6 RIOERSIE 510. 614 • 3(1461 SEER I6010E TO OODE MIME DOST. CAI* N61N 0061141/ 4101 0514 L LOCAL 0014551* P* SEPEFVI1 0.306 • 20161 NIL BOX TO *40 • CO61RL11 CAE 'C' DEB RMP PER 80.1006 S10. 000 ® S.W. 110E 00 D19'O0E 40154)30 A.C. PAS]D)1 ® 06TIELT C AC 3081011 O. )5 C.A.B. • 0LOCAE EXISTING 100410 510E MD NRRTAWES P01 101)8 SI*PL PL. • NGT* CCA* 0. 1. EXISTING EIER 48)04 PER DETAIL * SOFT 3 ® 41041E EXISTING 44.8.0.0. UTILITY 00 MPIX1030 EM .E PLAYS ® PROTECT IN RAE EXISTING UTILITY .DAO 3070108040 LOCATION *PUN PROJECT NO. PW 15-14 COMORCTI* REED DATE U1 040)5(06 DATE )2'D 8001 OBE COIRICT* IISSC10 DATE aSRETED MOM Ar NO neer 5. trn NM 00 TOP IP 0130)1...1 .att I WAS NO 540E 101130.0 AS TO. 80100. N/A 001100). OINK ST DEG® 07 04 3102X6 PIENIED ODD M 9PO61SION Cr MTC 1RME150 TORII Z A. C.E. Bbb 130000 31 DATE 400770 00 M1E: DOOM W. .CIA 011110 Cr 3/11.18 5016/C470 000001 R.C.E. 411271 CITY OF TEMECULA EPARTI NT 6 RELIC NOR. IMPROVEMENT PLAN PECNANGA PARKWAY NOTES, QUANTITIES, DETAILS 9EET NG. 2 1060- 1060- 1060- -1060 86+00 87+00 88+00 89+00 90+00 91+00 92+00 93+00 94+00 95+00 @PIER oIL ROE lop 95,17.0.7 I O N A L vamEONERINIECO Michael Baker CCWIRUCTid RECORD CONTRACTOR INSPECTOR WIE COMPLETED DATE 92 iM WHId REVISIGNS DA IOM 9 8 M8 K.7Wel Pt a6 Ltd Rd DAYLIGHT a8 io Qt PROPOSED 11/8 EXISTRG 0/8 DAYLIGHT DATE ACC'D R/6 BERGN MAW NR 11.6. irrOWETIM Or To. m osvATiow as we PECHANGA PARKWAY �ry HURON ST.1 Ob 1 8d LIMO. BT MAN BY �d DEDED BY PL.M6 PREPARED GOER M 9➢ERVISICN Cr W2 FRIV4C19C0 4WTI1E4 JN. 40 40 0 40 120 TEG EIOED BY: WTO: ACCEP100 BY' WT[ TWAMS 0 OARCIA DIRECTOR Cr PUBLIC ROOMS/CITY GOITER R.C.E. 482)9 -1060 PRarILE SCALE CONSTRUCTION NOTES 0 CONSTRUCT C. MO GUTTER PER C.O.T. STD. 201 000N6TRCT 510010.0 PER C.0 r STD. 401 OCORTMICr 109101 C. PER C.O.T. STD. 404 OCONSP LCT 6 171. AC PAVEMENT OVER 14 C. A.8. Qc06RLCT 1E010.1 RARE PER MHA STD. 141-4 Q9 Cm61RtT 1401AN TAPER PER APO STD. 140-3 @SPROUT. REMOVE MO DISPOSE EXISTING URB MO GUTTER + OSAKUr, REMOVE 010 DISPOSE EXISTING SI(E9NE( 10 0 @SAONT, I0L001 MO D1`•P05E EXISTING 100101 000 F OSARCUT MO OVERLAY PGP DETAIL d 9011 2 a- W @RELOCATE EXISTING STREET LIdT E/) W }@GMAT RAL BOX TO GRAM W ® SAIGUT, MOVE AW DISPOSE EXISTING A C. PAVEUO41 Z@ P80TECT 1N RACE EXISTING UTILITY AW/OR MPER1Th00 ES WPEA LOCATION ON RAN U N Q LINE/CURVE DATA TABLE ® BEARING/DELTA RAO11S LENGM TANGENT FOIE 0 8.54'10.6 X4X0.44'53.9 -- -- 100.01' 643.15' -- __ TYPE A-8 CAO TYPE A-8 CG 4 X49'0014.9 547.44'53.9 -- -- 57.55 466.61' -- -- TYPE A-8 CG TYPE 0-6 008 5 6 10'44'53. 181'50'10• — 4.00' .139.76 5.65' -- 14.51' C. TYPE D-8 -0 age PIPE 0 G leo'DD'DD• 17.04.53.6 I.- -- 149.00' -- __ TYPE 0-060 8 0.06004 TYPE 0-8 DMB 9 ID X4)'44'5)•9 .0.30'04.9 — -- 341.00 5,04 -- -- PIPE D -e CURB 117E D-0 DMB 000 CITY OF TEMECULA PROJECT NO. P8 15-14 PEPARNENI O PUBLIC Amis STREET IMPROVEMENT PLAN PECHANGA PARKWAY STA. 86+00 TO 95+00 9EET PO. 3 1r19 }WETS NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION - 30% SUBMITTAL - 8/19/16 s p0 3 0 g1 3 1060- 1060- 1060- -1075 95+00 96+00 ANSPOSE0 R/R ExISIINC R/ 97+00 98+00 99+00 100+00 101+00 102+00 103+00 aea 104+00 R/4 — 1 10IAN �Tnvcl�` j;'_ PECTIN * PAR14Y LEY Michael Baker 1011* 1. FN i61R41.7i� IA EDUA 11d PECHANGA PARKWAY 120 SCALE 1•-40' -1075 PROFILE SCALE N0Ra.:• 0' 100X1.: 1 • 4 ' • 4. CONSTRUCTION NOTES 0 CONSTRUCT DAB NO ONTER PER C.O.T. STD. 101 00061RUCT SIOEOPII( PER C.O.T. SID. 801 QS CONSMO1 CRSS GUTTER PFR C.O.T. 510. 210 & 211 0C06N6CT ACI SS RAW PFR C.O.T. sro. 402 020210CT IEDIAN OAS PER C.O.T. STD. 204 ®2061181CT RETAINING WALL PER C.O.T. 00TAINIIA WALL STANDARD 00061RUCT 6' AC MOON OVER 12- C.A.B. 0 01611 CT IEDIAN TAPER PER MRA STD. 140-3 ®SARDR. REMOVE AW DISPOSE EXISTING 01183 Aro DOTER ()SMUT. 800120 AM DISPOSE EXISTING 0100001( ° SAROR. REMOVE NO DISPOSE EXISTING IEDIAN Cum 5X00031. ROAVE Aro DISPOSE 0010IING ORES GUTTER 05ARV1 NO OVERLAY PER DETAIL. CR SWEET 2 OR .00210 E0I5TI1 STREET 110N1 00861800 RS TU110R PER CORM 00 111E1610E STD. 614 0 HAST SERER 124100 TO 0400 0IELO0E EXIST. CAT01 BASIN ® ADASI RAL sox To GRIM *RELOCATE EXISTING TRAFFIC SIGNAL NO APPR1AN6.S TRAFFIC RR 0102I, RAM. LINE/CURVE DATA TABLE GEARING/CELT* RADIUS LENGM TANGENT NOTE 289.41 TYPE A-0 tlG N11'44133.11 TYPE A-6 CC 99'30.47' 34 10' TYPE A-8 CEO X49'30.02'. 270 04' TYPE 0-8 CURB X47.44153.11 TRE D-8CURB NI7.11 531111 251.45' TYPE D-8 DAB X41.44'531111 TYPE 0-6 CURB TYPE 0-0 CMS 91'28121` TYPE A-6 CRC 10 N47'11.53"11 TYPE A-9 CRC 04r44'53.0 69 771 TYPE A-8 CC 12 1414.55 56Y TYPE A-9 CRD 13 TYPE 13-0 CURB 1.47.44 63.11 TYPE D-9 D,m 15 Nnv4'v11 276 86• TYPE D-8 CUB 16 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION - 30% SUBMITTAL - 8/19/16 TYPE 0-9 CURB PRO.ECT ND. PW 15-14 4. ILISIRCTICN RECORD DATE R REVISIONS DATE /LCD 9801 HAIR! CINDRACTOR INSPECTOR DATE NFLETED NONOROISE P 3-1211. OW. ELEVATION 21118 SCALL bt123NM AS POND BRTICAL RIA OESIB0 CRAM 6Y 0m® 10 O' N RMS PREPARED U 101 TIE 91EIRISION CV DATE PRP/CISCO84 WARO. R. R.C.E.R.C.E. 91610 RECONCILED IK: DAZE ACCEPTED BY: 021E NOBS CAICIA DIRECTOR 00 R.RIC OMS/CITY EWIl.A R.C.E. IRA CITY OF TEMECULA 000X0018341 00 PUBLIC "ORM t STREET IUPROIAEMENT PLAN PECHANGA PARKWAY STA. 95+00 TO 104+00 SLEET ID. 4 619 SEETS 1085- 1085- 1085- 0 0 0 0 • a ~ w �w W E_/) ?w J W 1- F COST 400VC — 1085 1 358 104+00 105+00 106+00 107+00 108+00 109+00 110+00 111+00 0 0 ••:1- 0 0 • 00 • F- F W W z w W W 1- 1— N. CASINO DRIVE Michael Michael Baker GNP roGO:NTT CENTER DR.. 10NAL EZoo*.. PECHANGA PARKWAY — 1085 4. PROFILE SCALE HO12. • 1 • 40' CONSTRUCT ION NOTES (Dews -Tarr 8 I/Y PC PAVEIEN1 OVER 12. C.A.8. Q9 CRGI000T IEDINI TAPER PER APRA STD. 140-3 1® SARLr. REPINE AND DISPOSE EXISTING CUB AND GUTTER 1@SAR, ROGUE 820 DISPOSE [X151140 SIRIN.R 1© SARK. RENOVE AIG DISPOSE EXISTING 1.13/IAN OTB SARIT Aro OVERLAY PEA DETAIL 014 NEEL 1 O RELOCATE EXISTING STREET LIGHT 43 CONSTRUCT CAO 'C' CURB RAMP PER C2LTRANS STD A880 ®PII.OGATE EXISTING TRATIC SIGAA. ANG OPPIRTANCES PER TRAFFIC SIGNAL RANG LIRE/CURVE DATA TABLE 8E VING/DELT4 RADIUS LENGTH 203.61' TRE Ab CG TYPE A-5 CM M5.53'01-11 250.13' TYPE A -B ENG TYPE o-8 ORB to 10'11. 164.17' TYPE 0-8 CUB TYPE D-8 CUB u'53-11 194.49' TYPE D -B DRB 1417'08'30"11 93.81' TYPE 0-8 CUB 01.01'55. 322.19' TYPE 0-8 CUB 10 N54.51.13.11 40.31' TYPE 0-8 GAB Or01.55- 322.19 40.10 TYPE: D-8 MB 1447,14.5.3.• 1138.5r TYPE o -a CUB 13 TYNE o -a CUB 14 15 Nor 15'21'11 163.76 TYPE o -a GAB TIC 0-8 DAB PROJECT ND. PW 15-14 Cp61RUCTia RECORD CONTRACTOR INSPECTOR COTE mFEETEO BENCH STAN Al Mr 0170011,011 0, lir. 72 W I2O TAL AS PDTED VERTICAL µ7A 0E510E0 m Cr NI ION. REPAIRED OGER THE SUPERVISION OP DATE: CO WRTINET R.C.E.JR. R.C.E. 84840 1408408 ED m: DATE: ACCEPTED m: DATE THGPAS W. GARCIA DIRECTOR OF RICK RORAS/CITY ENGINEER R.C.E. 48219 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT 6 FROLIC 11M86 STREET IMPROVEMENT PLAN PECHANGA PARKWAY STA. 104+00 TO 111+00 NEU' ND. 5 o< 19 SETS NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION - 30% SUBMITTAL - 8/19/16 \goA1AU Acrm\L.\AV\ 1090- 1090- 1090- EXIST 4W' VC PVI SIA • 111400E0 EXi51 N'12 CNO 8 TOP OF 44 10 040 3x. 0.955 EXIST 100' VC PVI SIA - 11100.00 EXIST GROOM AT CL RIP OF ELT IEDIH4 S 111+00 112+00 113+00 114+00 115+00 116+00 117+00 .10 COUNTY CENTER DR.. SUM TEMECULA CA9.1 PHONE 1961 INTE RNATIONAL o in..Ic0 T Michael Baker PECHANGA PARKWAY — 1090 — 1090 — 1090 CONSTRUCTION NOTES (9 CONSTRUCT 000 ANG OUTER PER C.0.1. STD. 201 O2 90610001 510044110 PER c.O.r. STD. 401 OS COI1RUCr 1EDIAN CURB PER C.O.T. 510 204 Or C016TRUCT C' AC P2001001 OYER 12. C.A.B. (21.110/1". REMOVE NO DISPOSE EXISTING IEDIAN OM 0 SARUT A/0 OWIAY PER 001'011 ON SIERT 2 RELOCATE OIIS1I10 STREET LION 73 ADJUST SERER PA7401 TO GRADE ADAIST RAL e0% TO MATE ®RELOCATE EXISTING TR7EEIC SIGNAL ANG APRR1AN65 PER 1RKPIC SIGNAL LINE/CURVE DATA TABLE % B 37010/2011* N1r09' RADIUS -- 10610 150.10' NOTE TYPE DCP iM I 3 140'53'0101 6 NSP] 1E21110 -- 156.19' 310.75' TYPE A -N q0 TYPE Ab COG 4 4 5 222'110'41' N4r15'2r11 2.25' -- 11.7E s1.29' TYPE Ab CEO TYPE A -i CAG SCALE. 1'00' PREFILE SCALE V 1'• 4. PROJECT NO. PR 15-14 CONSTRUC/ION RECORD IEYTSI06 DATE ACV() WEN 890 CONTRACTOR DAT CDIPLETED WM. 11, NC WIDOW TIC }Ye DENTIN TN NA SCALE 10141414044 A5 6101 VERTICAL WA OES10ED 90 6 4 FY PLANS PREPARED 00[00 TK 5050315140 a DATE 08ANGISD 1440111EZ 0. R.C.E. 11040 IECOINDEED 9T: TATE ACCEPTED BT: TATE: 11005 V. OWCIA BFC1M 6 RO ELIC N6 t /CITY ENGIN R.C.E. 40279 CITY OF TEMECULA 1000011041 6 RELIC 1101E5 STREET IMPROVEMENT PLAN PECHANGA PARKWAY STA. 111+00 TO 117400 PEET NO. 6 619 sum NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION - 30% SUBMITTAL - 8/19/16 R 5 8 R/1 U' CA. 12' 51' (03') R6. 12 51' (45') TYPICAL SECTION out p6f'. 51A. 11709.00 45 03+45.15 M IM6. 4'124.42.45 TO 73'111.15.45 CA. 12 1616. 516 542 1 10.1.61700 15 1' I/1 (.3') 13.107.0.15 TYPICAL SECTION PO SCALE STA. 11360.00 TO 062.37 CA. 12 SI'II 01.0.45 TO 11565 05 151 (0.'0) (55') (43') (43 ) (30•) (45•) (13•) (0/1) (12') Michael Baker SUM WO 7.012 ON AL 111...1.fcc4. /MIST K MQ 26T • 09.2. P 102 N' 1 T 1116.01 TYPICAL SECTION STA. 51+1,5100+11.37 0/1 U CA. 11' 51' (N'1 ** NS MOON 11601145 IItT.-A' LT. 101.45.45 TO 111x.1•.45 13. 11.427' LT. 115.45.45 TO 103+24.45 1341 101.44.11 Al 45 101.1..3. CA O1'1 101.44.11 01 45 101.11.15 I I 1 1 kdp 0 STA. tS.a.3/ 0f0 115.10.6 01') (45') (N') (35'1 (13') (N/0) (12') 45 01' (511') (43') TYPICAL SECTION STA. 101.x3.11 10 101.10.31 TYPICAL STA. 10x.6 45 TO 115.13.14 CA let NOWT 161611111 ,3' 11.41' ET. 115.45.45 TO 103.24.45 NV) (N' ) TYPICAL SECTION MO STA. 12�3 70 4. 100+15.0 10. 12' TOM. SI' -1' TYPICAL SECTION out 51A. I1•73. 4 10 124.24.15 w 5• 2 p ROA 0/.. 51A. 103.1.10 45 111+17.45 K 8161 (W) (N ) (45'1 MIST "ff. ((5 I N7 (0/A) (70') (Rm (12') .3'-101.15.00 TO 11003.0 1106 0.3•- 30'-11065.4 TO 11260.00 TYPICAL SECTION (6 5011 STA.1000.1I TO 600.45 u 545-100../.01 10 110+45.15 12• 11106 51 - 43•-110+4.45 10 11260.15 (50') pCIT. K 7451. 0601uCT1011C010 0010 19024010 101[014 MIC Cu .ETE0 .r A015106 .AR ODOR YAW MIMI Al 111110•61111.1 ir MI. PI SO Mel MET . Lal 1014500L AS (67x3 1612104 R/4 *RI0t0 00000 7 010x3 IT v 70.16 AMMO (*01 111 SIlAYISIOII 01 MIL MP/CISCO 6MTIIET i. R.C.C. 5406 0[050® 60 04DNDMIL 50110 0. 024010 .4 0(0¢16115 015.1* 1056/CITY 061112 R.C.C. 41271 CITY OF TE ECULA C150TI1dT 15 PulLIC 506 STREET IMPROVEMENT PLAN PECIANKA PARKWAY TYPICAL SECTIONS 9Q1(6. 7 1519 ,or, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION - 30% SUBMITTAL - 8/19/16 E a 8 8 8 TRAFFIC SIGNAL GENERAL NOTES I. ILL NMN INTERIM M0 [011194)0 901, COMON TO M 0015106 6 M STMOMD RAM AND MEICIF101N06 6 M STATE CO CALIFONIA, OEPMTIORT Cr TRM6/OtTA11a (CALM'S) GM 1015, 00 M MECUM 00)5006. 2. A CITY Cr 11300LA 0060000/ REMIT 904.1E 7001)700 10 PESM1 5001 510114 M FROLIC 0)047-060. CITY AANQED PARRS 0010t QILSE M 0040101144 001 M R.Y6619111T1 Cr 0TAINING 09 EIWPOEEMT PONT. A ®T 6 M POND SNL E REPT . M 40617.01101 SITE AT ALL TIES. 3 M CO1021OR Gm/ E RE11061NE 701 071010190 A ETATIFD TRAFFIC COMO RAN 101 MMT LVE 001)516 ASSOC.= RIM M IRM110 STOOL 0161)5[1104 4. M .OGT I. OF ALL u)STIM 6000010 6MITI6 IS AA10tTWTE OLT M L.TMCTON 931 E REMOSIIE FU Mt1n40 M ENACT LCCAATI01 MO OEM Cr AAL 68,16 611040 THEE NGT SOM IM M RM 4101 TO STMT Cr ION. =OlC115010110 5071Q ALEUT AT (821)) 40-4111. 5. M 0017720100 SOCA E 7050610E WOR 011AIMI0 M FIEITIIGL POSIT 009 M 0I11•5 S ALDI. MO SOFTY 06MTIOR FOR M MINIM 00)04.. S. M CONTRACTOR SOLA E AE?0610E FOR 01)019110 ILL Ate' MINIM M0 NGTIFIING Of 'MELTED .1®016 AT LEAST A 1016 PRIOR 10 START 6 500. 1. DOGS SON 011ERRI04. I4ICTI1 LDP 101MONS!VAL E 5 MINT IN 01MERIt VIM 10 FIT WALING IN M DIRECTO. P TIM4E,. LDP ERC66 !MAL E 115E C . 406 ELECTOR 9170 MILL E TTA 2 MO DETECTOR LEAO-IM GNU SNL E TIFF M. PRIOR 10 16TALLATl.. M 0011m1 OR MIS 0513470 REPIESENTATIl0 MILL 4,110 ALL LDP ETECI. 41)11106 IN M FIELD. ALL ACTG.. 571160 !011 E IN RALE PRIOR TO POSITIONING 6 DETECTORS. LDP E)EC66 MNL E SEAM 611)1 A NOT ELT 8. M OIOA'TOR SOO.. IS RAMMED LSM 1NST.ELGT101 MELTE OL). IT 931 E M ONTRALTOVS IESO6INLIT TO 111004.E M APPROMOR MIF! Cr COOCN6 010)100 FOR M MEWED 0EMT101. 9 PLL 001110E 4106. I0ICA1116 901, E 11 Old. M 510414 106144. WORARS MO 5)06 MALL E ETM, PLASTIC SIGNAL WAVS ANG LOGES ME NGT RUNITTO. ALL bOCLE 510. INDICATORS WALL E LED (DIALER OR CIT AF7OED 04179). 10. ALL Im61RIM 510015 NAL E 0.10., PECGTRIM I)IG)106 MVI, E TYPE A RIM IMI19Mt104L 91010 DIMAYS. I0OIM STOOL 110101/100 SIAL, E LID (DIAL IT[ OR CIT APPROMW MAIL). REESAIM 790)01109 519106? 951 E TRE 951M TAPE PR0f 50 S. 5471/2 -eo-0 (ST0) 5106 APO ADA MAla9-1110) 11766. 11. ALL 7E-15!101 0011701 MILL E LOM 1101 sours RIM SELF TES) EI[66 OR Cin AMMO [DML. ALL [MM OPTICAL OVUM! 931E SWEET M STOOL RAST A191 M RAPING 1000. PRI. TO INGTAOATI01. M 91011Em OR 0IO4RD ROIE4RTATI0E 5041 EIONIE M GAL? LOCATION Or INTACT. IN M FIELD. 11. ALL N11 06 MALL E 00. 9. 11465 0110151E 10110 01 M 7016. PLL 00 9011 TOT E LOCATED INA 91MI0 1 FOOT PMT 010 A@S RAVI OR 0111£5*). 0/1 FOL 005 MO 0465 MNL E COVER MO MN, E NORM IRMFIC 11. M 4040121. MNL OQI7 SIM M 00)011 M ENACT 4411101 Cr AL1 TRAFVIc 5105. 0411659) PRIOR ro INSTALLATION. 14. Pm C001115 30.1E 1-1104 815)0 501105 5 07E000E 0)0. 0L1 51100115 311 E 1-1101 COMM. 0FET011C 610117 MIL 10T E 01,60. ALL CO04(15 uDER ROQ*) MC1I. 9011 E INSTALLED 5)0011 O0. Crti.. 15. 00) 0310CTOR MNL E MINMO1,11 (00(71410. IOEMIFIGTI01 MILL E M 0170[? LIELING. 101)5 C ROOS PO 091) FMTO0D 10 M [000)06. M IE4)I1IGT 101 9011 E PLA®. CA. MOOT. OR CAMP Cr 000[090 IN EAI RLL 80( MO NEM M OO OF EMP CONTACTOR METE M 0101085 ME TOOIIN1ED. O. µMIWIES ROLL Em 0011 GNERILLor 1501). *110 Ful M -61 LENS. 11. INTERNALLY ILLWSM10 50061 ME 5)015 ROLL E TYPE A'. SIM 1E000 MNL E TYPE 0 (4) I0PER MO Lau CASE. 18. 11a0 1RMF)C 51001 CO0CTOS SNL POT E MUCO. 19. Mr LMOSAPING Or100D N M TORIC 5100*. 006601109 901, E 300) 1 OR REAMED TO DE SATREACT I. 0 M 00506 MO M GOMM OmG. A. M CO0T0ACT6 901,E REMO6)0E F. O PLE1IM ALL 7101 LIST ITO6 PRIOR 10 TRAFFIC 51004 T1A51-01. WORK TO SE PERFORMED SCOT F. THIS PROJECT 31, 400151 . INSTALLING TRAFFIC 5 PO 400 Aa IDEEK MAD 4011NM i01061NG LOCATOR COSTROT I. RECORD GR ONTRACT. INSPECT. GR COOLERD Michael Baker TEMECULA CA.01, INTEEN ATI O N AL a Doom.. CITY OF TEMECULA TRAFFIC SIGNAL AND SIGNING AND STRIPING PLAN PECHANGA PARKWAY 11(' l INDEX YAP EASE I'Cm• SIGNING AND STRIPING GENERAL NOTES 1. STRIPING. 5101116. 6 POEM. LEENGS SRM, POT E INSTALLED Ala )O FIELD 116/ECTIa AM APPRO. N M IP9[CT01. 2. All. MOM SWIMS AM 5101 LOCATORS 0091E 11@6101) 00 441061) E00E STRIP IO 001)6. M INFECTOR SWI, OETEGI50 M GALT LOOTS 6 M 0101 501rt, . 3 ALL RI 5)00 MO TIMN11S 5106 SWI, Is 01-15106110 01* RERSCTI)E MEET INS 00 E A INNERS Cr 10'136. DINER 700£4100) OR 011E 5106 Or E 0011ELI110 01.10E 00111?)!! 9EETING 4 HUES OIIO0I0 STATED. AL, STRIPING 901). ERIN MO 1 01WT0 AT COURIER DELTA 6 M 010 ETIM , 6 8. CC M 010.45ALO OR 516 098. 5. ALL RI SIO6 SILL E ACCORD 1 FEET STOW 010 AIM 8-C. P. OR AS SPECIFIED ON MRM. ALL STOP 906 SILL E LCCO00 AT M MRO0 Tlm Cr M corm, DELTA 6 M 610 RETURN OR EMM M RC.001R 0005 !MOS LSLES Om1ER51E MEC1410 0) SFURL6SNFWillc.- .7 M PLM. 1. M STOP LIDO 9011 E 0 FEET COMO M STOP 0)6_ If INQUIRED. DIRECTION. 500 SNA MSD E 0 FEET 011)0 M STOP OM 01 9 RCT 101110 M 516 9. .RLL P04000) ID19D6. STRIPING. MO PAT0O9) WMI105 9014 COMM 10 M LATEST 416101 6 M [51)09114 NVOAL ..MO. TRAFFIC MONO. DEVICES (0110). M0 CALT506 STMOMO MANS 02o-0 11001 014- . 9. STREET 4010 5106 SILL E IM)M1ED AT Al, I5RIB.CT106 NOWT E INSTALLED MOS TIC 8151.. M RAMIFIED 01ITC RAN. 10 M PEST INTERIM MILL E 91E2.1t a1Ny0G 6 APPRO.. 0004 SIM RCCVIITE 30-91 CR a -OOP NODI ASEIOLY. 11 ALL PARDON. STRIPING MLEEMILLE MS M1 INSTAL6 TIC TER SERI. 94 3 [010016 5IMOMO MCCIFIG)I06. 11. 01.1. COOLICT1* P91169) LE0005. SOIPII0. MO PM/E41 116(11195 904.1 E 0050) OR ET 5000100)90 Pu 50)101 15 Cr M 1411156 5)004* MECIFICAT106. 11 ILL PAINTED SR1vIM 931 E 009E CORD IN fpr 166 TOM 7 OATS. PMT IO LOM MG H GR ETON DATE 6 INITIS INSTALLATION. 4.4. 441. P44/EM .50196. PARROTT 104000. MO LOES 8 OR NICER 9011 E MEAOLAS1IC 1NfS 011EA)E 41910.. M M 0CPM11EM 6 PURR 1.60 15. AL*. P0004) 51RIPOp MILL NAVE MEED PARON . 1.611NGs (1094) PRI SEC1I. m 6 M C6TNM6 5TM060 OECIf IGTI06. INDEX OF SHUTS MEET NG 00211.6. TITLE MINT 9-10 11 TRAFFIC 513. RM w2NCA PMWT AT Gslw calm NAM 5)011NG MO 51R11R0 PLM) 1EONICA PAFOAY 0104 VIA OILERTO To GSINO ORITE SIGN TRAFFIC SIOAA RAN PEONOAi PMOAT AT VIA 06100 I INw_vvw 140)3106 GTE 0G NAM NO FOR 'WV CUM1104 IR Ka 9:10 1ERII.TAL M 'ORD PERT 1011 5/9 06100) M CRAM N DS RMS 79PMED TRIER M 9EERTISi01 6 GTE M R. O11ERS R.C.E NLA 901 100001® N: GTE ACCEPTED 91 011E T' S S. OMNIA AST. Cr FROLIC S OO/CITY [MIN. R.C.O. 48279 CITY O0F OEPMIIGT O NOLO m76 TIURIC MMIAL/MOIMIO AND OTlOIO MAIM PICNIANOA NAREAY TITLE SWEET MINT M. 8 Cr X SEER NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION - 30% SUBMITTAL - 8/19/16 TYIIE 111-7 M-) M-) ▪ .53 ------4/.------�..--- ---�-_-- \ --�--- �-' (5•) (61 PECHENGA PARKWAY pr) (11') (1E') (121 (5'). MM (0') (7..) (l4.) (12') (WI .,.9(5')SE.79 (12') (14`) 57-.. 54-2 (1 NOTES: 1. CE41a MEED 6 519000* POMMY 15 b 1951 Michael Baker 40210 COUNTY CENTER OPL. MATE 123 TEMECULA CA KIM ZONAL s•E1m04i,LIw.6 I CO6101194 SEC50 041E 0042911104 19111204 DATE 1041160 n 1E515106 SIC'INN LEGEND WYE SGq MM 1202 120 MP IV CYO 111 612 11111., .20 220.2 12.2•AlM21 2221 911101/6. IOIED 7411111 5/A 12 12• 12' 4' .3-3 9.00 42-1 (45 b m 0 AO 50 110 f 506E -AD• I -?� ---1 N., :-. 11• -: O illait NWW 14 - -11 PECHANGA PARKWAY Tfl IV 641190-) CONSTRUCTION NOTES: 54)51116 510110 IAN 116761. II1G03D STOWE (DETAIL 1PER G6T1411 526040 1.11/6 ® 115T.1LL P451ENT 16161,6 (11EAO1KTIC) ® ROOK E.ISTIR. 755042 5196110 STRIPIK ® IIOTRL 510 (50 POST IE 104545) ® 4007 50 56.090 0451115 Sla ro AMAX 00Sf161 5161 11106 001470 16 Ma 55 000 51 66 66 IAD 7166 11030 MU TIE 9/011414102 6 DATE RIM R. 311116 A.C.C. 0410 10521110620 51: 0411 ACCEPTED 51: GR 111066.. WC IA 21114 11 6 RILIC L116143/CITY 0011601 R.C.E. eV' LEWD 0115T1K 5161 51512(42515071)511)111 • norm 5104 1L 46® 5161 (61 4111671154) (12.1 015217 VIE .I0111 6' 110® LAE 1110111 96 5101 EEE 5144 16102 DISTIIC 515)7110/00 PRDomD 552171/6 47 lAE Rol[ 2. L6EI0 5151120 701 Ita N 215E K-1 2. RIGS 1111115:11516,51101 EMI I16EI0ECTI32 DETAIL "A" WORD AND ARROW BIKE LANE MARKING 104 TO 515E CITY OF TIEME ULA 0751119 a 10B -IC 4506 TRAMS SIGNAL/MMIC AND S1N1NM1 PLAIN PNCIWNA PAN SWAT SIO NIC AND STRIPING PLAN LD)0(-)000( 9EET M. 9 4 X 9016 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION - 30% SUBMITTAL - 8/19/16 RR gTIp3�.1 O 352 1@.I! 1 - ILL•" 0' , 1 _i ZRIE /MI Fro• . i.211� ElinlIM3SiNINFI gtfAI ' IIS'- = 15 yI RIE• 'MM.ZL15) 1r r-- < INSTIL On _ .GSM I :1W ..o I 0215 A. .•RLE STRIP <n') WOLF CREEK DRIVE SOUTH TME Iv MOM (L) .,A I TME Iv MSO 00 ..+ TME Iv NOM (1) 811E STRIP (n•) RPE IW AMOR (L) 5115 5102 1101 STA ML TOE IW ARM (1.) DETAIL RAI A G) 1 . .A'.-- rnL C DETAIL •0• 0511E STRIP (50' TALE Lv 3117.MS T• O. 9.) 315' 19.5-42 / •.' n• 51135116 0.341.ALR S1RIPI10 TO 911514345 Ap RIPE • MIT: STRIP (n_) 12 (2• IS -T 12' STA. M-9., TOE 11 MSO. (R) 40 00 000 n In SCALE 1.440• NOTES: 1. DORM SPEED 15 RONNEA Ramo o I5 45 RO Michael Baker .10 COMM COMA 02. 1050 L. E 1; I RA 11241 :. Sm'N5• 5 511E 51517 (50• 171 9.2-1 (20) 00(15 51517 (n•) PECFENOA PARKWAY PECFENOA PARKWAY In CASINO DRIVE (N) (A') • • (1.') 117.15 112.15 (12.15 (l0•) 112.15 111.15 tn.n (2) _ .. uMaD 1 1 1 1 1 (IE) r / wlGN V5IS.fTI.D/ J/ sr. 1 s 01110 15 OO 01E03E IDR UNIT SIW ERE T001 • RO' AIONIEGIEWP DETAIL A'J CASINO DRIVE (8) CONSTRUCTION NOTES: 51(35(16 SRO TO ROM m 116TILL 9.00® STRIPE (DETAIL 1 PER CR.T N STROM RM) ® INSTALL PAWNOR AMMO (IIOOLASTIC) ® 71031E 50(51(6 PORNO WOG RI ® INSTALL SIGN (ANS RST IT ERRM1) ® TOLE MO DOOR 2245116 3102 o\ �1 9.111529. [9.115155 SIGN al INSTALL Ir 9.111E 331141 ® INSTALL lr 0II1E LIRi5 LIE ao W ROTE STRIP (50') M-2(1) DETAIL •A• RIR v1 MRO. (R) 313. G 51(5150 SIGN EKI5R06 SIGN (GN 5051 LISIT) i Rs®SIGN AI. ROWED SIGN (AN MET LIOR) ((2) custom um nom 12' MOM IAC 9100 SO STREET RAE SIGN 4 5=04 51131155 S13IP116/00 9.00333 SIAIPINS T fi i BE KITE I. TE¢ID SPC NS PER CAMARO 5141E SC -J E. RACED IREDIAIELT AFTER EAGN INTERSECTION DETAIL "A" WORD AND ARROW BIKE LANE MARKING MR TO SCARE 0561RCT10 R.CONS 021E ORTINCTW INSPECI0 DATE L5REIED M REv131oNS OATS CVO 1001 IDI.( 1122•2 22 22 TRI. n MO 202 MR. .122f. IN NO SCALE 1ORIi0.IN. AS (ORD VERTICAL M/. DEMOED 00115 M M GNS RMB AWNED LACER DE RI ER0ISIGN 15 POE MMI K. 3112.6 R.C.C. MA RE0.03133 115 0215: ACCEPTED 1m DATE TONS W. WC.. DIRECTOR 6 9.5115 .D RS/CIIT 01011EN1 R.C.E. 41279 COY OF TE ULA 017 5051 6 RELIC 05 T-APTIC SNINALANONINS AID SliSN1 RAW (161 NICIIIINSA PARKWAY SIGNING AND STRIPING PLAN 941E7 M. 10 15 X SEE15 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION - 30% SUBMITTAL - 8/19/16 ■ILL 000CT00/60411115AE GEE EXI50116 WEA 118ELED •) NM. CONSTRUCTION NOTES W OUSTING TYPE 120E CWOaLEA ASSENT, IN TYPE 332 GNNET TO WAIN MODIFY A5 REWIRED Q OMENS TYPE 111-6 SERVICE FORM. 00.05. TO WMAIN. MODIFY A5 EWM. O REMOVE 00 SALVAGE (x151100 POE. RUOW EXISTING POAMTIEN COMPLETE. 30 FURNISH A00 INSTALL VAST AIN IOIHIED 5104 PER STANDARD PLAN ES -TN. ---- DETAIL -U-. 1:1510 CABLES NO 9210 TO BE PU.101 ENO( TO 221 IMISTIIDEO PUL P0x - A00 IEWNEt1E0 TO IXI511NG IPOUT106. 000LIEIGTI06 54011 0E WINIAINED INTI. PER FACILITIES ARE 15 RACE. SPLICING 10 9210 WILL NOT E AU_DIED. CH POE. ,1151100 VENIOE WADS. R2ESTR14N WAD ANS PEDES1R)N4 O 511 KITTEN FROM POLE 010 POE © . PROPOSED PHASE DIAGRAM ■ CONDUCTOR SCHEDULE AIM OR r.ur CIRCUIT A, ® ® ® ® w LUL N.P. 02 21141 N 02,40,42P A 0 © 20-4-100 30' PEOESTRIAN 15' 054 2-11AS 0 SP -1-0 N 0 •1,15,M - - - - - - 1 1 - 12 CSC C 40,•2 - - - - - 1111 30' 30, 15' WV D 01,02.0E S0-1-1 - 2 - 1 1 1 © IA 10' - •1•1003.118P 14 14 1 • _ _ _ 1• • © 51-5-1034 03,04 _ 14 1• • _ _ _ 14 • 3' 23.00.•? _ _1. 14 _ _ _ 1( 14 3 14.3' 3' - © 25-4-1004 304 45' • 15' • 0540 • 2-145 • 50-1-1 • TOTAL 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 5 0 - A ARO 11,-2-T 4 00-1-T 4 0 4 • 15.1' 3' - 0 OMB- - - - - - 1 1 1 C 1 1 1 3CSC D 1 00 5 - 14 14 14 - - - 4 14 C .ePPe - - 1• • - - - 14 !!I WI. _ _ _10_ _ _ 14 • TOT. TOT 112 1196 24 2• 2• 2• 2 2 - - SI041. COMM I4 I 1 510 LIYI1410E 24 24 24 24 - 2 2 - - TOTAL 3 3 3 3 1 3 3 14 14 CLC 02 _ _ _ _ „3....(4,3,./43431 • µ _ 34 34- 34 _ _ 34 3• •5 - - - - 2 2 2 2 2 AO NI TOT. - 5 5 10 21 21 0.03040 VEHICLE PRE -OPTION 14 1• 2• 24 - 1 1 2/242/2• VIDEO DETECTION MILE - - - - - - - - 12 PR 5104. INRAWNECT _ _ , 1 1 1 1 2 2 2495051024211141511925101 C00111 512E 24 34 34 4.4 2.S' 3• 3' 2-4' 2 -4 - ■ILL 000CT00/60411115AE GEE EXI50116 WEA 118ELED •) NM. CONSTRUCTION NOTES W OUSTING TYPE 120E CWOaLEA ASSENT, IN TYPE 332 GNNET TO WAIN MODIFY A5 REWIRED Q OMENS TYPE 111-6 SERVICE FORM. 00.05. TO WMAIN. MODIFY A5 EWM. O REMOVE 00 SALVAGE (x151100 POE. RUOW EXISTING POAMTIEN COMPLETE. 30 FURNISH A00 INSTALL VAST AIN IOIHIED 5104 PER STANDARD PLAN ES -TN. ---- DETAIL -U-. 1:1510 CABLES NO 9210 TO BE PU.101 ENO( TO 221 IMISTIIDEO PUL P0x - A00 IEWNEt1E0 TO IXI511NG IPOUT106. 000LIEIGTI06 54011 0E WINIAINED INTI. PER FACILITIES ARE 15 RACE. SPLICING 10 9210 WILL NOT E AU_DIED. CH POE. ,1151100 VENIOE WADS. R2ESTR14N WAD ANS PEDES1R)N4 O 511 KITTEN FROM POLE 010 POE © . PROPOSED PHASE DIAGRAM QUADRANT DETAIL 1UWA0E •OOCMM OM. GUMMING PLD P15 1 •— RYA TVP[ _4 w LUL N.P. 02 21141 N (553 A 0 © 20-4-100 30' PEOESTRIAN 15' 054 2-11AS 0 SP -1-0 PA9P6 OPEEAtu6 SNAIL E Am EN ALL MOWS. DOM SRF,: 6 PM PECIMIOA WIPE 55 WM q1 0.91 DI 5 SIGN LEGEND: 0I51Dc 00110E HEADS. P01015I4N 1(M. POE 10311EO 5101 2 LOm5 AND PEDESIRIAN 191 4011040 PRa6 POLE © TO POE ©. 0E1E10011G RNIQE WADS. PEOESTRINI WAD. PEOESIRIAN R93 KITTEN. EMERGENCY VEHICLE PE -00004 (EWE). MOST NN IDNIEO 5ION. POE tED SIGNS. 1196 NO LWIMAiRE PRO. POLE ©TO POE©. ®EXISTIPC VEHICLE MEADS, 150(575(3211030, PFL£SIRINI PUSH BLITT0, E0E0E30, WANGLE 01-031)EN (LNPF), MAST ARB ICUITED SIGHT. 1196 A00 LUMINAIRE FROM POE ©10 POLE ©. El SEE FIBER 001)5 C011142414T134 PLANS EOR 51C 11ET1400101. Michael BakerNOE WOO1C01m'COrtEAO... 10001 L412•I INTERNATIONALRvruoo.i • POLE REMOVAL SCHEDULE 510. DA. 28-4-120 30' 1St 26-1-120 POLE SCHEDULE STANDARD 1UWA0E •OOCMM OM. GUMMING PLD P15 • PLACENLNr 1.1.SN.S RYA TVP[ 00T. 36 WC LUL N.P. 11A01 A541 POE 21141 0 (553 A 0 © 20-4-100 30' 45• 15' 054 2-11AS 0 SP -1-0 N A EX 19 via Eduardo ©10 - - - - TV -2-1 SP -1-1 2 1 EX EX - © 10-4-120 30' 30, 15' WV 2045 S0-1-1 - 2 1 EX 10 P•44m5. PNq © IA 10' - - - - TTA -2-T 9-1-1 - - Ex EX - © 51-5-1034 30'I 00• • IS' 4 OSP 4 2H35 4 50-1-T 4 SP -1_T • _ 3' 1411 0411.3 Rd 4 © IA • 100- - - - TO -21 • - S 0 3 14.3' 3' - © 25-4-1004 304 45' • 15' • 0540 • 2-145 • 50-1-1 • 01.-1-5 • 1 • 3 2.2' 3' P1cfm44 Pkry 3 © 1.4 4 10'• - - - - 11,-2-T 4 00-1-T 4 0 4 • 15.1' 3' - • POTHOLE IEP POLE LOCATi06 PRIOR TO DOMING PUB. Re SEE DETAIL 'A- NL EOIIIPIENT Ex15T100 ALBS NOTED (4) 1E0 (0 ) RLOCATE 2 LOOPS 2-C1-0 I .12E.2:06 1 ,1-.r. I 1 ---1--1, ,2' 12' 10' 11' 12' 3. 1 12• RAISED MEDIAN 1 11e am I 1 I ._ %SiCC,� ry. P.1 1510 EI 141-3300 A "V! ,14114 12• PECS/1 4f6 �.T• 12' PARKWAY 12 -2 RAISED MEDIAN • ' 10'- • 0JlL • •• alI i. • Fi 01 • TI P 52-91NEO) DETAIL •A• POE P100E001 DETAIL (10 SCFE) DETAIL "B" EETECTOR (OPTICOD 1648 205) MAS. W CLAW (PELCO No AB -121) DETCEICY SEND. PREF TCN DETECTOR gTAIL 10' 1.110 12' 12' (5') DETECTOR PLACEMENT DETAIL EX 2 CLE. ADD I DC 2'! 14 EX 2-C 310 (YMICE) 10 LIGHTING 2112 (1196) CONSTRUCTION RECOPD DATE CENO4CTm INSPECTOR DATE COPLEIEO 5, REV19106 DATE 0001 INAS eolt n:\PORTA\153542 000ANGA P051 EWEMIC\GADD\1RANSPR\OLV\153542-11-1SDNG BLANCA-SOTO 5/12/10 408 P44 VERTICAL 04/0 OESIKED BY ENS DRAIN m •6 000210 5Y R¢ RMS PREPARED LACER THE 904AYISIEN 6 DA1L 121211 N. MILEIO R.C.E. 6470 RECORE]® HE DATE ACCEPTED BE:IMPS W. GRIM PAM DDIECRA 6 0.10.I5 KIRKS/CITY ENSDEON R.C.E. 45219 1-510 A 20 40 PO SCALE 1•020• CRY OF TEMECULA OPAROEN0 CS RTIC 0006 LOXX-)000( TRAFFIC SIGNAL/SIGNNIG AND STRIPING PLANS. PECNANGA PARKWAY AT WOLF VALLEY RD/VIA EDUAINO TRAFFIC SIGNAL PLAN KELT ro. 11 Cr X WETS NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION - 30% SUBMITTAL - 8/19/16 f • CONDUCTOR SCHEDULE r— CIRCUIT ® ® ® ® A N ru.•2.49 - - - - 1 12 CSL 60 A 6 O IA 10' - C OS... 16 - - - 1 - 10 (0 92.6101 3' -• 1 -1 5D' i 1S' 6 WR • 2-195 5I-2-1• - - - A5901 3' North Etter. Dr• © 17-3-19• 30'9. IS' • 15' ' 040 • lxAS • SV -2-T• SP -1-7 • 6 • 2 ER 0 P•00Rngo14y O 19-4-125 30' TOTAL 15' 2 1 SV -1-1 l 8/2 8PP8 1 a 16 North R•UR 0 (1) PPS 3' 4 - IW •SFS - - 2 - 2 ll '' --JJ.. .913 - - - 3 CSC TOTAL 1 1 2 1 /12 II96 2N 26 2 - SIGNAL COMM COMM 14 14 1 1 1 /10 WI/MIRE 20 2. 2 - - TOTAL 3 3 3 1 t i/ l6 0.0 02 00 ea 6• - - 6 M - - 2 - 2 TOTAL 7 1 2 - 15 OVICECNEE-OPTION VESICLE 0PTi 1/ 261 - 3 VIDEO DETECTION CABLE - - - - 12 PR 5194AL 1NTERCONECT - 2 24 960 510441 INTE11mlECT 1- 2 C001)15IS ■ALL C00CD14/00011T EXISTIIC IME. LABELED •) NEE. CONSTRUCTION NOTES QEXISTING TYPE 170E CONTROLLER ASSEAEILl IN TYPE 332 CABINET TO REMAIN. 1GDIEY AS REWIRED. Q2 Ex'TII6 TYPE 111-6 9RVIM EDUITENT ENCLOSURE TO REMAIN. Np01PY AS REQUIRED. 0l MOVE ANS SALVAGE EXISTING POLE. Q REMOVE EXISTING 71.0ATION 011170 p3 INSTAL POE 1001000 5)16 AS NOTED ISE 01150110 VEHICLE ,44.05.EIC 05. ELER1 40110E 00-EIPT101 (EWE). - �W5 N. MINTED 5101. 1196 NO LW1M1E FROM POLE OTD P01 ®. EXISTING YEMMOE READS. RRS1NIAN TEAR. R.DE3m)0 21.194 91119, EICYGENCY VEHICLE PRE -061(0A (EWE). MAST N. IOARD SION, 1196 AID LWI•MIRE 1101 POE OTO P0E ©. OY0 FIBER OPTIC CO.IICAT.I6 PLR6 FOR SIC IREONATICN Michael Baker 40010 COUNTY CENTER m. SURE ItO TWEGMG01 1ONA L•.rwinic6: PROPOSED PHASE DIAGRAM r— y -USED 9D •1 •2 •3 N O 19-4-125 30' 1 Yi u K •1 60 RASA. OPERATIONS *MLLE RED 6N AIL PRAM: 11E146 10 35 yrs •0.F CRO. LR SIGN LEGEND: 5 In R2rs(uI R23!(u) QUADRANT DETAIL e PUSH BUTTON PEDESTRIAN POLE REMOVAL SCHEDULE TYPE LOAIARE ••IC 516. N.A. L.W. N.A. O 26-4-126 30' 45' IS' O 19-4-125 30' 25' 15' DETECTOR PLACEMENT DETAIL s• POLE SCHEDULE ■ STNOARD LOAIARE ••IC 90ML I MMNO PEO PPB • PLACEMENT 11..N5 Net 116E NOL 9G NA LUL AA MAST MN PILE 90144 • 0140 A 6 O IA 10' - - - - 111-2-1 9•-1-1 - - A5 901 3' - ®29.5-19/ 30.1 5D' i 1S' 6 WR • 2-195 5I-2-1• - - - A5901 3' North Etter. Dr• © 17-3-19• 30'9. IS' • 15' ' 040 • lxAS • SV -2-T• SP -1-7 • 6 • 2 ER 0 P•00Rngo14y O 19-4-125 30' 25' 15' 60R 2-0A5 SV -1-1 9-3-7 8/2 4/3 Eat EC North R•UR 0 (1) PPS 3' 4 - - - - - - 2 I EX EX - MIME PER POLE LOCATIOS PRIOR TO OAE12I16 POLES. • SEE DETAIL ALL MOMENT EXISTING OEES5 NOTED ( • ) RE• ( • ) RELOCATE ( • ) STATE LWINAIRE MAST ALM 90 DECREES DETAIL' A' POLE PLACEMENT CETAIL (ID SCNE) DETAIL "B" LCTECTOR (OPTIMA IMIEL 205) I0. AW 10MTIM CCNP (PELM N3 AH -121) PRE -OPTION DETECTOR HASTY. 1.0uNTII6 DETAIL CONSTRUCTION RECO. DATE CLATIRACTOR IM4ECTOR DATE 00RETED 10[419106 DATE BENCH W., NEM. nE 00014,101 1.1 X:\POATA\153512 PEOIANOA PORT NOENNOWOO \DRY19•Y/\DLV\I51547-12-T5.06C LILA/CA.5010 8/17/76 4:25 pro SCALE R011EOOY AS NOTED VERTICAL N/A 0031000EPS 10 PRAM BY 6fODD BY BNS PLANS PREPARED 00FR 110 9.4115101 6 DATE Mr N. IOLLO R.C.E. 60410 REC0K10LD BY: DATE. ACCEPTED BY. DATE MOMS R. EXLIA DIMMER 6 RELIC 1004$/0111 ENGIIEDR CITY OF TEMECULA DEa2MHEN16 MUG 0075 TRAFFIC SIGNAL/SIGNING AND STRIPING PLANS PECHANGA PARKWAY AT CASINO DRIVE NORTH TRAFFIC SIGNAL PLAN W SHEET 10. 12 Cr X 90015 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION - 30% SUBMITTAL - 8/19/16 GENERAL NOTES CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1 ALL dAN., EXCEPT STATED OTHERWISE M TK PTS. SNELL BE M ACCORDANCE WITH: D Cf 71018 A STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATION; AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS A) 20T0Ox (AIWA), THE STATE DE CARODRA, PLANS AND 2010 SPEOFICATIONS. GWFORIA MANUAL 014 ORT AN ( OTR CONTROL nem.. )CAW100) (LATEST TCN); THE SPECML M.ASIONS. TRAFFIC CGHTRa DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE MM ME2 MANUAL ON HNIFORIA CAUFGmM TRAFFIC Cama 0011 LAG (WAT1NEAWSTTEEDTON)�). AND/OR ME APWA WORK AREA TRAFFIC CONN. SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED BEPOE ANY RORK IS STARTED. A 3 FLAN FOR NORK ID BE DONE WMR M RIVERSIDE RIOa T WAY mCONTROL NEEDS TO BE SUBMITTED TO TIE COUNTY OF R... FOUR RE PRIOR TO CdzmUCRd. PRECISE 1LLSAEXISTING ORTINKNORR. THE .ALa£LSREE.ON9FRA NG .EFGENGROUND T UTILITIES OS TO LOCATE ALL ILTILIOES .0 ON THE PLANS OR NOT AND TO wOTECT NTIMES EMLFROM ANY POSSEWER SIBLE DAN. PTREES RIOR ro un PANG SAT OF REPAIR OR REPLACER., Cf UTILITIES AND ENGxfEFca-SVORRK OF ALL NN' OIENV. cdELICTS CONTRACTOR. iNd1ME .ALL NOTIFYTHE CH.0E5 TO BE MADE AND APPROVED. LOCATION OF UNO LL O UTILITIES SHOWN PLANS SHABE CSDERED APPRORMATE GHLY. ONTRACTOR SHALL CARER.,N. mEXCAVATE IN ME AGM, AND SIN. LOCATE Au UMUnES SNOWN EXISTINGGUTRUnESUSIOWN O THEACTOR SP.L BE PL N, REGARDLESS OF XAACT LOCATIOFCR NP. N. t0 LOCATIONS OR SEVER LATERALS SHOWN d ME PLANS ARE FROM THE AVAILABLE RECORDS E SEVER LATERALS FRd THE PROPERTY NAY A NOTBESHORN O THE PLANS HOWEVER. M ASSUME THAT EACH PROPERTY WILL BE SERVED BY A SEWER ELATTE LCM Ka LATERALS ARE NOT ME PROPERTY OP ME CITY OF TEMECULA AND MESE UTERALSEFFd SEWER MAIN TO CONTACT E.H PROPERTY TOINDIVIDUAL PROPERTY DETERMINE UNE LOCATIONEANDMDEPTT,. OFCTOR ALL S.H LATERALS LATERALS INvuELBTHF. INoOLNPS FOR IS SUCH CS ALF GOx4oERFmuUDEMi1.RICEMD FOR ITEMS WORK WIAd MAY AFFECT Sud LATERALS. THE ACTOR SIAL NOPE• EACH OWNER G ME SUBSURFACE INSTALLATIONS 'NCI.. S.BS CE MSTAWT10IE AANO S APPROXIMATELY MARKED BMINE THE Y THEOT PEAYGN DEPTH SPECTi OWNERS. Of MAY AFFECT OR BE AFFECTED BY ME CONTRACTOR'S OPERATIONS. ITE VT. OF TEMECULA WALL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY CONFERS.. TO THE CONTRACTOR FOR ANY UNMARKED M OR INCORRECTLY MARKED APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS Br E RESPECTIVE DRIERS. IF NO T ITEM IS PROVIDED IN TIE CONTRACT FOR MS WORK, FULL CMPEASATNN FOR SUCH WORK SHALL BE CaRSIDERFD AS INCLUDED IN ME PRICES NO POR ME OMER ITEMS NCR, -SUBSURFACE ANY UNDERORa1N0 PIPELINE. CONDUIT. DUCT. AIRE. OR 01.R STRUCTURE. IAEA. STRUCTURE. EXCEPT Nd-PRLSSURIZEO SEWER LINES. .01 -PRESSURIZED STD.. D OR MANTAINED IN OR ACROSS NBLUC SSTREETS OR PUO RIGHT -Of -WAY. OPERATERIGHT-OfWAY. CONTRACTOR ..L NOTIFY R ANY CONSTRUCT.. D KONS � PUC WORKS DEPARMENT AS HOURS PRIOR 10 TME s. OPERATIONSALL CONDUCTED d THE PILLARS, INCLUDING ME WARMING HP, REP., N.V. 6. DEPARTURE OR RUNNING . ANT EDUPYERT ANLL BE LIMITED TO THE HOURS Of 300 AN. TO NO K SHALL PERFORMED TK PREYS. ON SATURDAY. SNDAv OR HOUDAAYzWORDE O , UNE55 OTH ORMSE APPROVED BY ME ONS NEPRESENTATNE ALL TRENCH EXCAVATIO AND BACK flu. IN ME PUNIC RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL CONFORM TO ME T. ONS REwWELENTS. A PERMIT SHALL BE OBTA.ED FROM ME GN OR TEMECULA FOR ANY MANAMA AND/OR B. CONSTRUCTION PAIN ME PROPOSED PROJECT AND PUBLIC RIGHT -6 -WAY. IN .L OPERATIC:14S RE.REMENTS Of ITE SATE GMSCR OF INGISTRIA SAFETY FOR EXCAVATIONS9. TRENCHER, e5 U0110 0N.RTOPPER TTRR.. COHiTROL S+ALL CAVI. AND Si E SUSPO K. WORKERS WORK UNNnl CEN EcTONS ARE MADE. MEOW..VUAMTHdF51A.ER MPS IRAN ON .:3oP.M.SHALL BE TO 300 AMM DAILY NO FFROM 4:30 PAP AND ALFRIDAY TO IPEN EAIAVA In1713 A STREET VIR DE STEEL PLATED AT ALL 1M ♦ AM ITE PLACED a CONSTRUCTION It. THE S PRIORCTO a M ENDURE PROVIDE ADVANCE "STEEL ARCH I AKAR" COSRn1CTd AGI. PLACEMENT. nO PLACEMENT G STEEL PLATE; SEE .PWM WAId YAMIAL FOR ADVANCE HARD HATS p Nd VISEtUtt ORANGE SHALL BE WORN AT ALL TIMES WEN VORNINC t3 ODE REMORAS SINAI BE 13.SAWCUT TOA c WW1. DEPTH OF 2 MCP. PRIUORLITO THE MOVSSAIYCRESSIN011.1.WSE STATED IN ME SPECIAL BEM. 111E PROPERTY OFdSTEAComRRIS CREATED BY ACTOR AN) SHALL [NOVA ORER EN DISPOSED Or ON THE SALE Y AWAY FROM THE .OB SPE M A MANNER AND AT LOCATION ACCEPTABLE TO ALL AGENCIES ON AFFECT. BY ME WORK. Michael Baker .16 CORER CENTER DR. 6.9042 INTERNATIONAL PHOIEMWAKE�sa TA. CONTRACTOR OR BENCHRAARKS. THANY M0U.E 15BE 9AND/OR BGHdBLE FOR MARNKSTING WNNNd ARE DISTURBEC MONIMENTS D OR DESTROYED BY C.STRUCTON BE SRH PONES .N.LBE REFERENCED AAND R LAACEDTR1x APINCIPINATE EXPENSE. MORMENTATNN BY A AKINSO LAND SURVEYOR OR A REGISTERED CME ENGKCF WSMIROREEU TO AS PRA.. LAND SUR... A GORIER RECORD OR RECORD OR REGISTERED CP. ENONERSAS PECO RLD E YYMEEUCELAND NSURVEYOR'S AACT.SURVEYOR OR 1; ON ME PPLLAANS RALEGS3Ec15LERNARE . SPECTRED. E STATION UNE K STREET As 9HOM 16. CONDI. SHALL .MCKFD OR BORED CR As DIRECTED BY THE 0,5 REPRESENT 17 MC CONTRACTOR SHALT TRAFFICDETECTORAS REiWIRED BY MC 01,5 a AL OUST CCWIRCIJ KHASRE% SUCH A5 ME PERKS WNnHC sDOWN OEC 1K BARE OR SATISFACTION OEXPOSED F THE P0%& Y�Dd�5 AT MIDMG INSPECTORS. d TO ME IAND RIGHT-OF-WAY MAINTAIN.FREE Cdpn. Rm. PUBLIC PROECTAA.. OEN. OR WASTE SPALL NOTLI3 CGI.TNUOUS USE a STREET SWEEPING 10.PRE5 MAY Di D PUBLIC dM OATH. THE t0 E�056N0Y1ORVOR JOB AGREES SHALL ASSUME 0 00 CONSTTM1c1DN OF [pMELLvCNINUaAL MTTHE RpREMENT HALCONTINUAL,/ NNTBELIDONRMALWORW. HOURS THE OWNER, T. E WEER .0 CONTRACTOR HHARLRESS FROM D SNAND vALL NDUIIMAK HOU RE. OR ALECED TN COLNECTION UABUTT ARI.0 AdMETHPEEDSOLEi DNEGFOH[NCE DIN ROH[ 1ONCORROGREXCEPTING . ORRNCPC� 21 EROS. CONTROL MaUWG RP -RAP. INTERN NOPE PROTECTION. SAN 0AG3 OR OTHER FOSd CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE PRINKED AS RECESS.. 70 CONTROL SEOLJENT AND SILT FROM ME PROJECT. THE CdIR.VOR STALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING ALL EROS. CONTROL ENDURES THROUGHOUT THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE d SYSTEM, SIDEWALK, CURB. OTTER, ROADWAY, ETC... RR. IS DAMAGED Br CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES .ALL BE REPAIRED OR REPLACED TO THE SATISFACTION OF ME CITY niE PROPERTY R 23. NO RENS'UNS SHALL DE BE MA70 NESE PUNS 111.10UT ME APPROVAL OF ME !MALLENGMEETE AND FIBER PEATCH YETLH1D5M MRNETHI14 G POWER SORRY ESTABLISH MC CORRAL.FUR.. AND MSTALL RGO STEEL FURNISHFURNISHRO AINSTALL T S.E.J.BO HOPEM CCNODHT NTRACE WILE. El— — IE AND INSTALL NO PROWS.. PULL BOX PER DETAILS d SHEET 06 AND o-CCNOLITT TO MSTALL 45 DEGREE SWEEPS FOR MILNE LIBER OPTIC CABLE. INSTALLNO. . PULL BOX RA OE.. GH SHEET d AND THE SRO. STO El— HWM. EASTMG CONDUIT TO INSTALL AS DE.EE SWEEPS FOR AVER OPTIC MNAS SHEHEEET Ode AND DIE SPECIAL AND 'NouST NO. BE PULL BOX PER �o- AI.. AND FOR NSTALL FIBER OPTIC SPUCE CEOSIREA CONAMMGATION. FOR FIBER LIa NECESSARYSTRANDS SHEETNTS SEE EURO. AND ...ALLI—I AM. N0. S -A.0. HAND YEEI OB. DETAIL LAOOT sFuroAeO El— I SUR EL B NOW NODE l CAWS IN 0 1- ABAPENN EASDNG 3 CONDUIT. FURNISP AND INST. I-. SME0 EIDS.G/PROPO4D Cd0GT1 FORN S LOOSE NOTED. SIFT FREE CABLE f�3 — LOOP 60' OF FIBER OPTIC CABLE THAW SPUD£ VAULT. 13 — REMOVE CASTING PULL BON. — LOOP 20' OF TIBER OPT. CABLE INSIDE PULL BOX. 15 REMOVE LASTING 12 PAR BIB SC IN ENSIMG CON NT. CRASS OTHERWISE NOTED. CONTRACTOR SHALL CDOROMA. W114 Orr PRIOR TO 0-- RONNE AND 03111. PULL BOX. RENO. ANIT EXISTING AGE COAT ELBOWS. VCCOHNECT NEW AND EXISTING CODIRT (PERV NHAGE CONDI. SIE AS TIE Ott5 ASSIGNED REPRESFNTMAT. SURFACE TO ATVE.ME 41FRGMDNCS AS DIRECTED BY REMISS.. INSPECT. PATE CGAETED vA• AAM AT PE LARNICIANT IF NV AO AM maw Gar NraTimie. OW =NM Br GYM T DEO® Hr PLAN NORM MRS TIE 4EONISIM DOG RUM*. 04001E1 E nen R6WMRB Bn DOE FEHEWTU0 BY: Ale nRNA .. VAGIA P PLNLI0 WIPVCITY EN TAGAT CRY OF TEMECULA DEPART.. OF Nalc .GMS MIEN OPTIC COIANNNCATNNNI PLAN PECHANOA PAN)CTTAY LIMAAA. SEET 01 IP 7 SIRES NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION - 30% SUBMITTAL - 8/19/16 FIBER OPTIC CABLE/CONDUIT GENERAL NOTES ALL SALVAGED EQUIPMENT SHALL FIE DELIVERED TO TE CITY PUBUG VON, BRA CORPORATION TARO ] DR'S OPERAT10N5 M CORMACTOR MALL AT 115 E1Q[NSE SPAS OR REPLACE DAMAGED 4ACUt0040)PROMPTLY MM ACCORD M PTY OF 15)0 01 STANDARD PINK AND SPECECAMIR OR CALM.. 1015 STANDARD PIANS AVD SPECOCATNN9 AS MEC.. M 01. REPRESENTATIVE. S ALL 21110100 0011, R0A09. 245x(05. ELLCIR0.ER5 ETC.. 94WL RE PROTECTED AND/OR REA.CC iN-x50 Al 100 COSI TO M Om. IN Ac STAMARANDROM p PLANS S[.MMCI IAM CANEORIAA MAW.. GAMMA IRAFTE GO MM WIC.. LAKES VAT BE CLOSED (111114). 5 AND/OR A5 MCC= 00 M 0101Y5 REPESp1ATIVETRUCTED A7 AMT S� UNLESS SRCIR'.Wtr YLORW RETE M 04040.111.0 RRMT CONMACT00 91505 ARRA T RA A l. 0 M CCry s4STEM ANO FIBER OP00 GTI. MM EMPLOYED 00 M M.N4FACTURER ORFMS/1ER REPRESENTATIVE. PRESENT 41 ME ILK M MS. IS TURNED M. B. NDR c 15 10 MALL . MECO T 5000 0CABLE (0911 i 1110."15 45 Bows S5 s.OM 520E INTO 0 PLCONBOXES VAAUUL*6 Maws SHHOWN 013.1H'. ALL NEW PULL BOXES SMALL BE No. BE 4010155 SHORN 05005.9.. 1.11 BOX 5.0. SHALL BE NO MORE TAM 40d N 9RTGOIRLLaLLESSSN059141 005l)5))1'N0 211 10, 40 CaP 00115 0 lag Z771`" 910011100-0. ALL PULL BOXES 0. ALL CONDUIT MALL BE SCHEME 00 PVC AND 1000 STEEL AT AL STREET CROSSINGS. AS SHOW 9. ALL 5CH BO PVC AND 000 STEEL 000.111 SHALL NAVE A A BARE BOYO RARE. 10. ALL IHR OPTIC YAW 15/SPLIO 5005 91"11 BE PER LA1305 51.110110 0RAwT0s AND M SPECIAL PROVISO . IT NEW PULL BOLES OR MULTS/FIDER OPTIC M. BOXES SIAL NOT BE LOCATED N CR MMN 1' D MIT CURB ACCESS APP AND SHALL NOT . 00MR MAN 5. TO CRIVERAI, IL EOPTIC CABLE SIAL BC RAMANDNRY Od7SED. IC09MICADON SIAL BE Br DIRECT LAW. . ECR DE1AE5 SED M MEC. PRON.. THE TRACTOR MALL PRONDF ALL PATCH CORS AND C.BIIND MM APPROPRIATE CMAECTOR TO CONNECT ALL M EASTRK.ROPOSED EQUIPMENT ro NAVE SKTEM MLY OPERA... THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL SYSTM MM MM IUM O9nIPT0KION 10EpSmD QJNUN.IIM SYSTEMORDER i0 InLu10E A COMPLETE OPERATION. 15. TR.. 9150"55 SMALL ROIAN IN OPERATION AT ALL TIES UNLESS ARMORS. BY TOE 0K5 REPRESENTATIVE. LEGEND 19. OPTIC 5.1Eu)TOVAMP M PROJECT UI.5. CAR[ SMALL eBEE TAKEN TO WOO DD.A.. MSE SYSTE. wry .0 EommuNKATION DOTE. . i ME Ev TNG [SEE CAMA15 STANDARD PLAN E5 -1A FOR 400501.1100£405) TRAFFITHE TRCONTRACT. SHACCTV µ5FR /00P THE OICATION W/A5GDCLUDING SYS M A17.5 010011/0 *1 TTHH10 ) IS RE0EDPREMOITATT004 0 NO COST F OTT OF ORANGE. EXST. CCTV CAMERA a COSTING AIR ROPE aM PROPOSED CCTV CAMERA CONDUITIC. AND JACK SHALL BE USED FOR INSTALL. I M VAM LOCAT.5 Or PROPOSED TS/VIBEN OPTIC SPICES BOWS ANO ARE PULL BOXES E *15 0.RN15 AMD MAT 04 T 415E TO B SMT FELD COOITONS AS ORECRO BY M CITYS REPRESENTATIVE ID. ALL _OS., 91.1 BE NSTA.0 A 155011150 0 ELT ANDER S.M. AND STREET. MEW SHOWN 0010001¢. 20. CONTRACTOR WSPO.BLE FOR ND111NG M OTT nLAmC OPERATIONS E.WIER T2 HOORS P100I ro C015TRUCTOx r. zI. 000NTRACTOR SIMI 110 DW ALL IRMMOE11500N0ML 511)10LEAR r 04 *TON5sI.55555 R THREE (3) WORKING 0.3 5901 TODONSII J0T1ox. Oz HAND OG FWNDAONS AND TRENORES UHOE DEAR OF OBSTRUCTIONS . POT NON° WOURED FOR ROUTES STOW OR NOT WT SNOW SMLL BE ME BE XESPONS MI O CWTIE > CON RA TOR.PRICME COST OR POT N0."° REOURW rat UTILITIES MOWN OR TTI. ALL NEN PULL BOA I OS MAL HEAD TINTERC.NrCIT. N. ALL CO.. AND INNERDUCTS M.L PAVE MEN EN. SEWED NTN COMM. PREFORMED PLUGS OR DUCT SE. O. 25. .AL NKRETE 9OEW.Lx AND ASM.T cWORETE PAVEMENT DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCT. 944E BE REPLACED IN MO N ACCORDANCE TO M OTY OF TESECOU REOOROENTS. IB. 9OEMM4 15000415 SHALL BE FULL WIDTH OF S00440 MM A M1aDN Of 5' PANEL 37ALL SOEM.. REPLACEMENT SHALL BE FULL MDM AND ATA LENGTH NOT LESS MAN 5 LSE. REV. N NO CASE SHALL A SQ.. SECT. PEMAM YA4C HAS A LENGTH LESS MAN 5 LIE. FEET MEN MEASURED TO THE NEWEST JOO 211. ALL MOROMO CON.T SHALL HAVE M PROPER CLEARANCE FROM ANT uM LIES PER M CITY Or MECUM'S WATER DEPARTMENT, W.DEL.ESnTANDARDS Michael Bakersun IR ®R9mE INTERNATIONAL vY..TNTn. E0 UAW' I o OTISTINC.5 WIER BOX 0 PROPOSE. SPACE 508 Q EXISTEXIST.W I.. COND. 10 05900 D1CO40 51 ® 0850*T TRAM SIGNALSPLICL 0 (VISTA. MN NH . EISMK PALL 505 O PROPOSED NO. M ROLL BOX - EX.. COOIAT EXISTING 1(9"1111 SM. - PROPOSED COWL. , EXISTING MITER WIER l % EMM. 1011540 90171 EXIST.. EXISTMIEN VALVE . POPOSD TRU. 9d. r. TNG RAMC CABINET A ERISTING FRE HYDRANT ra EXI4ITING SERVICE CT 0 11151505 TELEPIOE FOCJK RL DEaARGATION 050150(1 115x(5005 .AMBER PER MEET. AS NOTED D EXISTING IRRIGATION METER 0 PROPOSE. POLE 500"7050 .AGER L7 OIISTINE [AIW BASIN EATER UNE MINE CAME N - SANITARY SERER .E ELECT. INE TELEPHONE LIE .5 U E CO INKATw ENE SOON DRAW ▪ SMO.( MODE RTC FIRR OPTIC CAME LOR10 51005 9400 111E CONTRACTOR IN9TED,a GATE COMET. .151. SOLE 5.1707 ADM • tw• 4.a NYIEOrt. MIN as IP .41 wo ralv rr _ e.• • . M AS LOI0 KORN. INN Mr VERTICAL w4 COINED DRAWN 40 .00zo n r PLAM MM. AM. M 950NISIOI GAR 0001 B. aMIQEE REm.UEin M_ DATE ACCOSTED BY GATE: 0 5. GAS R�1.T KWIC AOA 15110 0*MEE1 C.E. ABBA CITY OF TENIECULA 99)41 EAR OF PUBIC MPS AOI or= COONN.CATIOINI RAN Fl0NANOA PARKWAY SWETT AO 02 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION - 30% SUBMITTAL - 8/19/16 mm WOLF (MEEK DR N 611.1 EvsMf. YC 1 -SC VIA CONSUELO CT 9"11119 SC 1-9C 5 14 MCI PECHANGA PKWY Um 1-9C 11115 VIA GILBERTO Michael Baker 9100009109119011. 99 T9 FsPPE 912 I N T E R N A TIO NA LIA.A•ii Ecom taro° 6900 NOTES THIS SHEET: wnc c412-gx, a..z c wo Enwo 9£-01 AND 03. z. FO" 19101115 9E 99E1 0E. PECHANGA PKWY mm HURON ST 0951190119 1903161 POE COORATTCP INSPECTOR 199151116 PAR - - 0111( al RIP On 'mum av :9 191169N1L m 191m ICAL W6 OMM A 002921 CT RAM 11E19m 191911119 9JGY15TM V PATE 9991. 9691942 • C.E. non IEIa•EO® 6C PATE 1 m1w er: PATE "OM 011991011991111O� F PIAIc macs/cur 1961109 4CRY OF TEMECULA GROCIA CEPAPITENT Or 0.8.1C FONTS MEN OPTIC CO1NI111NICA11ON6 PLAN PECNANGA PARKWAY 03 O 7 SEES NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION - 30% SUBMITTAL - 8119/16 PECHANGA PKWY WOLF VALLEY RD (5 N CASNO DR CONSTRUCT TA PEWEE DATE OTATERTACTOT INSPECTOR Michael Baker WM COWIN COTTER 04 YEWLYAL 10 R A L ncox .Ice NOTES THIS SHEET: I. FOR CENTRAL FIBER OPTIC AMP GE EE WEFT 6D m. 2 fat DETAILS SEE SHELL 06. PECHANGA PKWY - -t O 40 TW 130 O VIA EDUARDO -r ALVISIOS n¢ 1004 IIA: Pram AT TA as we. R MATAIWIT TN WA MISTED R PAI CMN BY 0.60. BY NOtIIOS11 �'.... _�°_e RATS REFARD .OA E,C 9WtIISIOt a AS TWEED VERTICAL M2 RUEH .TTTWxIOIEI E- 75 MIMED Err. MIT: Dais 6. suc DIRECTOR W RELIC TWHDrcTre Ewlrm CITY OF TEMECULA CEPAPE10W Er Ra IC 10644 FIRER OPTIC commuticanoss PLAN PECNANOA PARKWAY Lnw_vvvv 04 er 7 seas NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION - 30% SUBMITTAL - 8/19/16 TTS Michael Baker 40110000M OENTEIC0. TAANOAACAZISTI INTERNATIONAL,.. cam'' cv6TRUCT ION R:C0I0 DATE ONITRACTOR IratcTm DATE ONFLETED CASINO DR NOTES THIS SHEET: I. FOR CENEWL CONSIMICITON NOTES AND TRIER WIC CABLE COMAA GENERAL NOIES ADO LEGEND SEE WET 0,.b 02. 2. FOR RETAILS SEE SHEETS 06 TO 02. I 10 RES00T REVISIONS DAE ACV KNOT WAN OM ad me iv we w WARN 0 NA 60000. mr. TA SCALE AS u � 121.90 126 .06 SEMIS) if M 12,60 T LDXX-XXXX 01MM F CT OETRED M RAMS nvxED LEER ,TE SIPanISION s DATE DE rvnm n: DATE. u41EFTEO Ew. DATE: WOWS W. WWI A Ram 9.vK9/cln ETCITfWA I CC..E. TG229� ioOF TEMECULA EcsERTEERT or AWL IC ARTS FEIN OPTIC CONY . MCATION$ PLAN PLICNANGA PANRNAY WATT NC 05 or 7 s€ETs NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION - 30% SUBMITTAL - 8/19/16 INNERDUCT DETAIL EXISTING CONOVIT ii,„_ PRCPOSED " TF0TILF TWO CONPAFTREN,NNERDUCT 0TH PROPOSED FOC IN ONO AND THE OTHER SHALL SERK AS SPARE. LOXX-X(X%I FIBER OPTIC PULL BOC MEIN NO SPLICE TOP VIEW RIME MOT MOM PARKWAY INTO N0 OE KILL BOX AWA 00~0,0 K. 6 CR BE RAL AMTNID COMBAT APPLICABLEIF Michael Baker weloccuNrr Cert. StlITE 10) TEMECtx.A, 0A 92,91 10NAL.�R ABWITW NNW SIDE VIEW LID SHALL BE LIBELED lNTERCCNNECf PULL BO TRAFFIC SIGNAL FIBER OPTIC CABLE CONDUIT AND PULL BOX NOTES: iO N0. 6, NO. 6E RAL BOX CR SPLICE BOX (AS NOTED ON PLANS) O 45' STEEP • LOOP CABLES O YAG EACH COIW? BY DIRECTION TO NEXT RILL BOX To SRN, CONDO, AwuC.BLE LID CONDUIT NOTES: (THIS SHEET) I OPIENSONS vARY ACCUpMC To SEE R COWArT EIC. UHUN WHO RAMIS SHALL BC SIX RIES THE I CARETER FOR ALL CONDuITS. 2. ALL RENDS SNAIL RE FACTORY BENDS. TRACTOR SHALL AUAPI CONOUT So/BOUTS FOR SPECNIC PROJECT REQUIREMENTS. ADODONAU CONOTAT ENTRANCES AS REQUIRED. EXTENSION (REQUIRED FOR No. 60 PULL BOXES AT SPEOFIED LOCATIONS) FIBER OPTIC CABLE PULL BOX DETAIL C IWICAL MINIMUM 130.[11. RAD, COBTRCTICN IECCRD DATE CONTRACTOR INSPECTOR DATE COMPLETED ar REVISIONS DALE KN. YAW 9YE rVl' NMI. IQTEONTAL DIA WE I NE L AMON RR vert Ia s IRT. a AS NOTED OrnTIN1 Pw.Ca VERTICAL DEEMED BV RIO MANN WE 0E0E0 BY PUNS PIEPIIED WWt DE SIIRCRPISION O DATE: RUEN TABRIOLE2 WA R.C.E. 78615 RECOUNTED BY: DATE NYFPIED BY: DATE: s E. GARCIA DIRECTOR K Ram RORDERCITY ORDER D C.E. Nein CITY OF TEMECUA co..., OF RELIC WRNS soET M MOEN OPTIC COMMUNICATIONS PLAN MC11AMINN PANOWAT 06 OF 7 BEETS NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION - 30% SUBMITTAL - 8/19/16 FO CABLE — VIA CONSUELO TO PECHANGA RESORT DR FIBER OPTIC TABLE (48 SINGLE MODE FIBER OPTIC CABLE) BUNDLE / 08ER / TRAFFIC SIGNAL CONTROLLER/CCTV CAMERA NOTES 1 1-2 PECNANGA PRIVY O VIA CONSUELO TRAFFIC SIGNAL PECHANGA PKWY O ';',`."c!=°:. TRAFFIC SIGNAL PECNANGA PKWY • TRAFFIC PECHANGA PKWY • PECHANGA REBOOT DR TRAFFIC SIGNAL TRO FIRERS ASSIGNED TO PECHANGA PRIVY 1 3-12 PECHANGA PKWY (SPARES) (SPARE FIBERS/FUTURE USE) 2 13-24 PECHANGA PKWY (SPARES) (SPARE FIBERS/MIRE USE) 3 25-36 PECHANGA PKWY (SPARES) (SPARE FIBERS/FUTURE USE) 4 37-46 PECHANGA PKWY (SPARES) (SPARE FIBERS/FUTURE USE) LEGEND TP88 SHEET: E.O. ESSION WISE -X VS INTIOUS - ICS FS. CABLE EXISTS. SC CABLE TRANSIAT Rx RECESS ® 0051 NTE° 1 RCN. • EMT PH STOICS EAST NW Rw PROWS. CCTV NOTES (THIS SHEET ONLY). 1 OIES LEGE., FIBER °POC PLAN CONSONCSON NOTES ANp °ETAES SEE SHEETS °T-. Michael Baker •0810 COLN,' CORER CIL SURE CO pHONE 10 NA LR«ncw T AB STPD PECAN. PITY 2A SW -0 i:131 g iTO:TN7Ir— y ID I� I COMMUNICATION SCHEMATIC NOT TO SCALE PECHANGA PKWY PECHANGA PECHANGA PECHANGA PECHANGA PKWY/ VIA PKWY/ VIA PKWY/01 PKWY/ CASINO CONSUELO EDUARDO CASINO DR DR ETHERNET SWITCH 12 PORT PANNFl ETHERNET SWITCH 2 PORI. PATCH PANEL I( • • • ETHERNET SWITCH IT R II • TRAFFIC SIGNAL CABINET TRAFFIC SIGNAL CABINET _ FIBERS 1-2 FROM PROPOSED 48 STRAND FIBER OPTic CABLE ETERNETSWTTCH 12 POP, PATCH PANEL • • TRAFFIC SIGNAL CABINET TRAFFIC SIGNAL CABINET FIBER OPTIC ASSIGNMENT DETAIL NOT TO SCALE OMTN.Cla RECORD DTE OWARACTCR IIRECIa DTE CURVED BY REVISION 001E NC'0 ERN am INSt AN TOP CT CUM PA SC AWL, SOON TSC RmTIM NN. SOLE DESISTED BY ON CSAR BY CT 0006 PREPARED *0E11 TIE SUPERVISION Cr RI DTE MHN B. NW61011E R.C.E. nen RENAMETDEO Br: DTE ACCEPTED BY: DTE S A. DACIA DIRECTOR OF R0.1C KERN/CITY FANNER R.C.E. 4K2A CRY OFTEMECULA CEPNTIENT OF RELIC IRKS • MOO OPTIC OOSINNMCATIONN RAN PECNAIINA PARKWAY 90LT M. 01 *0790(15 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION - 30% SUBMITTAL - 8/19/16 TRAFFIC CONTROL GENERAL NOTES 1. ILL 1RAFFIC 01211. 6TIES 910L0. 0160 10 TIE LATEST 011119) 6 TIE C512601A 04*. 9) 1121260 1R)TIC COAIR. CETT= (CALIFORNIA 000) 00 1)0 5TAIDWO SPECIFICATIONS FOR 11110 EOOS 06131[119). 2. OR CI17 OC11EER CR NIS MDDE500•TI*E 105 TIE 0102119 10 INITIATE FIELD 0005 TO 091E P1LIC 56£11. ]. RL 102210 0610. 60101 901 E IE15ED 2051 TIEN OEM MOT IN OE. 4. SOC 50.0 901E 04TRICTFD 10 TE 11110 EOM R: A S.Y. 00 133 P.Y.. 10050 1110115 110067. 151.E AMMO 0003110. 001 M1e1 ROK 15 001100. 0261 I06S 96LL E S P.Y. TO 5 A.Y.. 91010 01001 7143*1. 5. 110004 OAST E MOt FILLED OR 6.011 /011016 MRA-00R)TN Mon. •. 1@571410 60111.5 SHALL E 10121003 AS 9017 9) TR RMT. 1. 13*MIT •1D M5140. 5156 5111 E 16140 24 1016 101E 10 0000.116 501. I. AOS TO 101EM05 SILL (E MAINTAINED AT AL 110:5 101.06 OVER AgYM61016 AE RCE. 9. TIE 06001E 901 ORAS 51101E 42 1656. ALL 1011)5 51001 LOE CEIFC101 GIM® DODO 06130119). D. INE OIOACIE 901 IpUE 010)0 20 MOW. ALL STRIPING IELOEO OR DOLT® Or 0611/0./19) 001. (STRIPI10141 E MLA= 101010MILT SIM TA/E.) 11. ALL SEERS 901 E 00111.0 1112 A 000 LEST (E A RE1IC11M MST AT MOS). O1. 1110.06 901. ALS E MIMED SIM A MID RAT. CI •516/9/• 120E NO 901E TRAINED IM 110 P.Oq iLOMONALS 6 RA615 TRAFFIC. 12. NO Sit 001 0151135 MARL TRAFFIC 510. 61001106 901E 0100M1E0 MIM ISE CITY 6 112811.1.5 TRAFFIC 0101510.40 1666 PRIOR 10 E051MA 061.0719). TOOACT TIE C119'5 1RAFFIC 0191510 AT (951) EA 4411. 13. 0E O1RAC1E 9.1. MAINTAIN ALL TRAFFIC 004110. 612101 14 1016 PER O0 NO 1 OAK LER 14. A Y13. 6 INTOOLE (12) 20 45 E O4E0 01 1 TRAWL IMO 67 MAINTAINED 0010 AFSMOAD 01 ISE EPAR0EN1 6 11110 516. 15. ALL NIBS ACM SILL .01E 0)1110 AFKU'IL 101 010 .PATENT E .LIC 505. INC 0.0910. RED 610/6. COIR 0OSAREO MO TRAFFIC 51061 ImIF1ET1O6 ASSOCIATED 01N OLOINIOR 06120710 ACT11T1ES 0)11 AWARE WHIN: 5106 E PLACED AT LEAST OE .EEA IN 1000 6 STAMIIC 061100C1I0. M. A 501M 00160 FLA91116 MICR IMO 9.1E .OAT. 0 ILL ARTERIAL 500£1 INC 0.09IES. Michael Baker ACAIOMAITY CENTER DR_ SUITE ICO TEMMA TONALMNE 195 , o* 5911 r CITY OF TEMECULA TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN PECHANGA PARKWAY -r lit I II II INDEXI YAP LEGEND AND CONSTRUCTION NOTES. s2r E IME II 001011 RI IN SRN AS MAO OI RDI 1 SRN (6100 MRAI) 1060119013 016110611MLL 171 OBTRCIMO LAE 0110610 ® 0.•/501107 100.01L.MOS AO 515 (F6) 500. Al 2600610 IIP 1016007 NE PALM TRAFFIC CONTROL NOTES. 15ONM MAT 510 MARE IMO NMI. 36117. D 0. lE 051MC1OR 901 IVUO 0110)5 72 )056. ALL TRAFFIC 51061 0.0E 6167016 DONAU 061116 0E 06130110. AA SON 101 015106 /ORM 1MPFIC 60. OPERATIONS STALL E 600)58100 011M 0C CITY 6 IOEOLA'5 TRMTIC 0)01510. 451056 MICR TO 0015110 061300110. CONTACT 00 CI1Y'5 TRAFFIC 010)519) AT (551)1544411. SIGN LEGEND INDEX OF SHEETS MUT 10. .01111715 A TIRE 9EE1 - 110710 01141 MOO 0O 011:5 2)414 TRAFFIC 00210. I216E5 10 E 00.2* OWNER CIO 6IMOA 0619001102 REDO 101E 0111.01E 11251.07E DATE 0FlE1113 5T 1E715106 MATE ENO. 145 11•4141 MEICI VIM. 3-11/4" WM. OM ON Mt 01 CM 1111 EMT MUM AT TM IMMICTIO41/ ft ALLARTAN TM SCCA. 00)10) . A5 01100 W 103. TVA mien 0 055 IT 000 IT 06 STS 14.06 009010 INTER 010 91011510 6 DATE: RO A R. ZELLD6 N.C.E. WA 0200110 BY: MSE: AL@IED D`. 122 TORS 0. OMCIA OINECM 6 .LIC .010/0119 DOWER R.C.E. 40279 CITY OF TEI2ECIA.A TRAFFIC =WOOL RALE ACANTHA PARKWAY 0011021 6 06.10 MKS TITLE MEET LOXX-XXXX 9001 10. 20 6 X 94115 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION - 30% SUBMITTAL - 8/19/16 1 1 GENERAL NOTES: CITY 0 F TEMECULA MEDIAN LANDSCAPE & IRRIGATION IMPROVEMENT PLANS PECHANGA PARKWAY FROM STATION STA 87+44 TO STA 115+36 PROJECT NO. PW 15-14 SHEET INDEX M. I TOLE WET M. x 1107.0 M RN STA p.N9h00. UNDO W (OYES SA. 3 R9.00-100.00ANTING RAM STA O0-100.00 M. • PONTINE RM STA 1aM0-I1031 O1. S IRRIGATION RM STA 1.0012.00. LEGOO Mo MRS M. R IRRIOVTIO RN STA q.OD-11.00 SE. 7 IRRTGATII RIM STA IOW -116.31 90.10 napPONr�•y)NIIIETAI.S SW. 9 ININT11 MOUS SM. q 9EIOilO EMUS I. A ORE ID6IRCTII MOT IS REMIND FDR 715 -RIE [ENTRACTE. FEAEUNiM INE •01St SAH ON REE PLAN. RE PONT1501 CAR E WOO AT ITC CITY 6 RELIC ES comma. SODEN FMN DRIVE. MED.. CSIIF WO OLIFI NIA. 2. THE CON N,ETCP NLL GIVE RE CITY I19RTDR DR PINOT RANGER AT LEAST AB 1006 10116 RHO TO 001101. AIN. AN EDN DOC WITHOUT HOER INSPECTION NIU. E SELECT ro E.ECU1. co I6FCCT11. CALL: 951lRAH11. 5. ALL W E NALL E CUE IN A6VOMQ OM 115 ROW. TW 5.0010 9ECIFIGTIUC FDR Ptd IC W M N6ILCTII '11E 9E06NN', CALTTIM6 woo., SPECIFIC -UMW AM moms. RE CIT 6 mon, 5171041 mynas. MO COINER. PIOT ,EEI^dTI1E. .. TIE70110.SRL 31111, lE L.M090APE NOMI 10 O 1Y 1110*. IC16 E,WL0 THEY RAW NO FIELD 4, 1 1106 RR)DR TO om61NE1110 9011 E POTIFIED 6 9* 0 CO MORNS TMT ME TO 5. TIE 15115 TO E NEE PRIOR ro I TELATI . a EV11T11 FAO DEE RAW 13 PIIITTED RINGO APPROVAL 611E LAMM. AMMTECT. 6. IMOUMO MTM SECTIO .216/.217 6 OE GINOWNT O. ROUTES TNT • OIG ALERT IOITIFICAT71 MASER E IWEO .FOE A VONT r0 COME' WILL E FOR CIG I.D. CML CITY OF TEMECULA STANDARD NOTES 1. ILL WOE/ TLA /ENE[COLOM N CCI 6 T IO MO COMINOLLT 6N'ICE m3AR1ENr tAr6f.M[ 56 lECif IdT11110 IMTwT11 EMUS. 2. .NSPECTIOS AN L WENS 1061M.CTIEN 1142TION TIC All CND. IIBR1m1 !11)1 111 r® 0. COOCTO 9151 IpmACT TIE TCM AT (qT) N1- 6.50 FRIT TO MODEM .00.174 IMiw111 TO 060.44 TIE 111110 0.-0. PECTINS. .. IRRINTII CON RE EA [NOS ME 0a1RE0 TO E 010.11E 8111 TO SOOTING TIE NINTENIE PERIOD. 5. RE CENTRACIUM SRL 9811 DATA SPORTS 11101 TIE CONTROLLER ro TIE CITY TRE 30, GO 420 6 DAY .1. 115)81. RE NNNACTO IS TO . TIE DATA MO MYE CONECT1m6 TO ML MOTION SINEW IS REMIND. VALID. YON MEAT 1060t. 111011.0.1 SERVICE ALERT AT 1-003.22.133 TNIFE1UStIN: do WIPE WA DIG. 7. TIE 11161.COMPACTOR O. E RESPONI E FDR 111 LOCATII Alm PROTECTION 6 ALL UTILITIES. FOR MOTH 6 LMI.O.O UTILITIES. DR FOR SEALER ASISTNE CME: MUT.. V-' IFONIA E151(01) 0!111 50A1CALIFORNIA OO CONN (951)SD231 SIMl) - 5777 ENR.. 1000 07. MINIM. 97ER 015MICT MOX..11 RANCHO C(10.04 A RATER OISMICT (151) 7OAOD WRITER OLLE R6E) (951) 27-4x(* THE SNOT 20 (11 0) TS.) (9*) 50 -MD u1GDR0.1 SERVICE ALERT (600) 716-0. ElR6EITO RATER DISTRICT 6 MOM CAL. (1511 116-205 S. 111 ELLS..MO 10.01)01 6 Ml uE1001M FACILITIES AB 9001 11EY 443-4135 &06155 0TAIEO 6Y A SENO6 RE AVAILABLE NEMOS. TOT E EST Cr MR 000 1111E ACHE M EXISTING FACILITIES. GENT A5 9061. TE N1TMC1DR CA 47 T1' f GENERAL IRRIGATION NOTES. 1. NCTO IMTNOMEL OE (1) NOME DRIP I1I0111 STATION SYSTEM 42 NL (I.E. WOVE COWL VALVE, OM FILTER. NEW. EOLAIDR. LOSE. ND OHMS. FLESH VALVE. ETC.) N 1011 1 NAL IHSH CALL THE TC. INSPECT. FOT.N I19PECR1 MO 00.1 611E I1 11TIa STOOL OE IN TEM I IP SENTAT 01 M 066 TIE INSTALLED IMiwTla STAT11. TE REWINDS [MP SK1ON NO E C061RETm. 2. IRRIGATION NOME. VALES. REEVING MO 01)04 COUPLERS ME 901 I7 ROAD FDR PENH 14,5177. SSIP1011 9TI.. E FLA® WITHIN RNALL ALFAS IN 110116 AIErENd 1164161. ALL IRRIGTid MOON 9811 E 100050 IN TIE CID RlOrt4-MY. s. LmLINC1Of SWLL EdSna MID E1gFIT TE GWENT EXIST!. MINTIER roELiNNTE IMRSIRAV mD0 lE El EaIPEPNT. .. IRRINTid SYSId ro 16C ODESTIC 1Al[A. ALL ON SNLL E NE IN I®SYILE 4)01 RE RNO0 Gl1F0Nu N1ER 015IR*CT AUES M0 101Ar*.6. .4 lei .M LOCATION `•{R $ .7• I Y j �S fp f '116111 \ 70 1113 -"'01 AL1 tl1� 500 0 R6MO .0.. I5 050U*ED 10 TME CE PRECCTI01171 EA942 TO ROTECT ALL 96RSCNES SERER DR MT SON I DEM RAW. TE mNRCM 5151 NNE EOLLMTMY EAdYATlU6 No /DGR 7415,11 IPODPGRm.o FACILITIES 9PTICIENRT 100 6 CO61RCT11 TO PONT REVISIO6 TO IEE RAMS REN NEESSON. NE MOW 6 REPAIR 1 ROIAZO.1 6 0)0 165RSLNES 9R1 E 606E 61 THE CUORCM. WATER WATER SOURCE s. EL. SHALL M INS,6 LE.OUTILITIES 701no PRIOR611016 roCENTRC1)41 OF PM WASH C16. CROSS OATEN. CR SORT NQETE POMO I0. ALL TONES STAR E MOOED M CIOOME WITH CITY 6 111101. 200001 pylaS MOM .O MO NO. I1. ALL ROOM CONDO 9013. E EOI51UW0 61 TE 0661NCT11 6 TIE ,42700173 DR 1111 9151E POET AT TE O.muC14, 5 ENO.. 12. ILL SLOES 9011 E MUM IMO CUMIN TERRAIN TO RODE A 06110.110 70061111 FAO OR DR FILL TO RE RANO. NOW /BUTTING TE ROTE. 10. RE CONTRACTOR 151NT E 9011 OLE MU MO 10.1. 19 0 6 1 6 11 111 FOL ACE SIRE 090(1)06 COIN IE NAE 6 016110CT101 6 TMS ROAM. NOON SEER 6 ILL AWNS M0 R.ENTY. NIS .102.1102 SNL MALT .MOO CMOSINIA RATER DISTRICT 0T-2631. PEAK COST.OmES11t NIG Sid 517E,1 PE NIA MINNS NON NODI TO Y1.0011- 500401 NO EDIM6 RNR' DATED 10/20/101 REPINED BY ALMON 001 FIN ROWE 420 00111001 IINOWTII. MC EMINENT SNIT E LDd160 WITHIN RHE CIT RIOTg-011 N I WOLF VAI_LEY BOA() .------_ POWER SOURCE COSTING 101111111.10 U WIN 00.0610 - PROTECT IN FINE. ESDI ro'I1 0111- RO150 7301 WNW RAN' DATED 10/00/x007 PREPARED R 17400 OIC P 1101 COITION/ IIPONRII. ILL comma 9011 E LOCATED MINN 015 CIA RIOT -6-11147, 064115015.1 420 MT E UNTO TO MOM T ORINO IOW. TE f00NC7E 911 0600. IIEl1.141. MO IOD TE CITY. 173 ORIGEN. OTICIM9. ONDRS. AGENTS. WORM NO TE 1421.0E N0111EC1 IWAEES FA. N3 MO ML L 15 764.. ZEAL CO .END. IN ONECI6 )5 05 NE PONTIN ICE 6 v I THIS MOOT. OICPI(a FDR LIABILITY NMSINS FRO OE SOLE 11150111E 6 RE CID DR 115 OG1EG. 1 . 11 Cr 'AS LILT' COO. 66 21 ' 1E 911150 1 RE 06TO TIE E LAMMAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR 10 NOEPTME 6 lE 14010O1T5. 15. LOW EIECim6 661 01 /ERA= AT EACH 16142CT11 WIMIN 21106 6 01OPTIEN Er RE 15110.7101 CONTROLLER NOTES. MI51119 m11O,E11 0/ ETER 00®.E - NORM IN RACE. 06/1061/1 9011 UTILNE EXISTING MITI. ONES FPO 74151110 0.110114 TO COSTING VCUG FOE 116Tw1)16 NEW WLVII. WINE CIRWEII0707 AS IROIIND. R3G ro TWptlll- N,OWCA RNR MEDIAN RM' DATED 10/2!.07 NEPAED BY MAPOI A no, FOR rcomc O- INOSE\Tia. ALL 1015011 MEL E LDCA150 R11NI* DE CITY PIO GING. ----I---=-°', '] �` 3 - 6 _-_ 2 '- - -4. 11 _____________ 4 / _� - �" NOTICE TO CONTRACTORS �' -•NI r-1- _ 4.-_ VIA GILBERTO I4RON SBEET 1(5 EDUARDO • )TII I I I I INDEX MAP NORTH CASINO GRID 1. TE 075111E no LDdT)16 MR H.ENTOND 31LIT161 DR SOCIEES NM 1 TEM RN6 ME MTANEO 1 SEARCH 6 NA.. ROOMS M0 TO RE EST Cr OA 1043.102E1043.102EEE M THEAMST. UTILITIES OCP, THOSE SOO I MIs RN. TE LANDSCAPE AREA: 0Y SALVES TO N I NEXT E COTRACTOR IS REMIND) 13TAM ILL REY R0R UTILITIES SON MO MM 01EA LIES DR S LCII.OMT 9011 HESE R42 MO ARM. TWO=.. N IED 26020 AIEM AO 9 VESTAL TWO= TOT 1011,110 MEM J 1P' a IS 1199619E FDR WORMIER 6 AM NN DANA. 70 HESE LINES OR SMLCRRS. 2. m6TRUCRI 067OCTO MOs THAT IN MCOODAIE OM mower A®TED COMITUCR14 PRACT165, 07606TH CONTRACTORS O SILL 01 10 WNW FM NT ETE RE90.6 616IL1TT RN SITE MOTION RIN THE NIB AI. 6 SCMAINTAINED 0661NCTII 6 THIS NOWT. ITO.. SUET' Cr ALL PERM. MO PROPERTY: INT THIS 100 0681 9151 175.7*11 )C15I TIM11 420 MT E LIMITED TO YOWL .060 1016. NO 42560107 m0 150 MTM/ MGRS TO. COE.. WOOF.. MO IOD DESIGN R6ESSI00L 420 ONE* TOREN0700 MN NO MO ILL 112311,1. TEAL DR TOTAL LANDSCAPE QUANTITIES IN TCSD 0101 '"3°0' AREA: -WON MO RAO 1012E - CT SO 687110 NO ANC CONE TOM SF 104.10 .11DAIION MO LS IM I NETERS - V LI O�ONO1RaLLG u RMT N. 61 TWO d RAM 6 GA L1 NSW %:11 EA PUNT UE CML. S.'. - d .. L, NNE: 2 d LAYDN 6 oN;06 Mu1H .00 9 AE UNM16 215 M ...................-C 00014 600044110.ACML .... ON NM1E6 MO /EDN FDR THAW. APO CONACI01 ALLEGED, IN ONECTII OM TN POCONO 6 ERR 1 THIS NOWT. 3. DC C17NC10L 901 191. E .9616E TO REPORT OISOEP5CIE5 IN PLANMO/1 FIELD CONNT)06 ISEDIATELV TO TE 7011 ETOIEER R. REMOTION PRIOR TO 0661.0,11. MO NE. E RE90616E 111 01SOEPNCIQ NOT SO RANTED Mo 150110. .. NUTTER RE 0x11131 PRAMi1 HESE RM6 WILL NGT NONNI5 4 FIN 1 LINE 1191, IIIIU110RIOD OWES DR VIS 6 HESE R/A6. ALL ONM4S TO 111 RAN NAST E iN WI TIM MO MOT E 11 0.0 1 TIC MONO 6 THEY 'RACE'. BASIS OF BEARINGS: REPAIRS TO EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS INE ENING RR MIS SAINT ME CEASED 1 TE LIE STEN STATO6 TIRO: T' MO ZNE NTE.- 4 )915 5) PER NATION- 10 *27 C SOFT. 9660 ELLIPSOID. CC56], 5 0. 00.51 AB 9 )5 *6 TE 424 FILM IN BOON NE. PINS 50 TIMOR 0 6 ENDS 6 SUNOS IN 115 701E 6 TIE ODOR E4NER Cr .NOESIS COO.. CALIFONIA. EIM M MOGI' W. CONOC 7 ro 1{1174 ININTII PLAN T11o22. NOTE TMT WI WIN.. IS WIRD 444115 DUSTIN LMOYMED 575100 PMO.- 085014 *3 OMAINDS LMO.ME MO IRRIGATION 041PVO115. REPAIRED00 7)11 TO P OTECT IXis11a srsTEM IN RACE 2 r1H 71 N61NE. SYSR1s IH6T ME O2AED 9TH/ E 02011 ro 111 NTI.CTI1 611E TIM I70 65104 420 POOR mon AS ANT 6 NIS 06RRCr. /.LCE boon M. ONO CPQ. 91115 MO IRE6 ro w11 111 DRICIALNLT 9FCII150 11.17. 1111 5151 E RCIAOTD ro A ®M 6 .' IN 9731 MEAS. TOO COUNTY COM. D ASSESSOR'S SOURCE OF TOPOGRAPHY: SOILS ENGINEER: LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE RCWD JOB NO.: E_ N_ LOXX-XXXX DISTR. 139SMRM SRN' 1 THEE RAM WAS PROVIDED 1 IMMO NOM SW. DATED m 116-16� NR'AL w1aa111P14r WOO TOO IM COOING RAE, LITE 100 CA awn (C )' ]Di -1500 Michael Baker 1 M T E E 5 A T 1 0 N A L YEBECULANON NNE 0151 RESPONSIBILITY NOTE: PARCEL IT 61 Ix NL a SITE M'1ER iM)urlbl C0057*0s A ' 70 02100 WINE. RE011O0M2 MO ILL AMINE. ODES 1 301744]. NUMBER: 90-210101 wpm 1 1/1' N7d 766016 191142 .ME Ripa= 066161111 RECORD DATE BY EVIS106 ONE .CAO 01)01 WM70)0061 SCALE ONO M 0100 6Y 101010 6r. DAM CITY OF TEMECULA EPARNOR 6 RELIC IOW SHOT NO. M w. Ae a1 062RCT1 S_V.' 5AM. H2120TAL AS 100 fir ®■r 4..06 NAMED Em TIE 9P01VIS0 6 6'041 VENINIT L�MDOOPECHANIA PAKEAV �� STA 87.44 - STA 115.36 TITLE SHEET610531115 ACEP10 1: DAO INSPECTOR O r N1. N 7.05115 W 0 yy Hj;,17)..5 111 DATE CP0.ERD WATICAL N/A DOW 17 GNOIA OIIECo1611d141056/C0T 111150 R.C.E..617f .AN INCE• .1. A. 610 9 Michael Baker ,X3010 COUNTY CENTER OR. SURE 100 -r-O.OULA .02601 PNONE1 NT E E N AT 10 NA LM�eawlaw m6 jl ROTEICT 14 RACE 01741170 PENRI70 DO 1011101101 111706. ILL DA NED 01 10001£0 LMOYNE, N 11193T 6 10 100400114, 9503 EDW® 11 000. Ste— O® 0/0 111101 0/0 0 V CO 414 O •< In PECHANGA PARKWAY STAYED COW. TF. •.._-c. 1 - c -G- c --c G G f: HORON ST. O O EN N Qa OR Ww (n = W U W _. v.... F, fn 61'108 OCRNIOPL NAM COMM W/E I OwORY 00660\ ma& % ama • • MIR .1.00 Nw 4.1701010101 we 1.n[ r v r v r v C MA D ME-pp�O� .P�e 4'd a. w y. F. v wvlvl,y' . N.L No v 1-N: M 1-N 0 ♦a Dov FN • w v momNT o. o. c17ar1'4 .„.* OTONu1 PNR.smR m bP N.0 0 0 O (51 MOM A4R.. AM 0040 .KODO oar M.. NON1 rem .111 Noe MONO. v ANNE a IN e 0 e a 1 COL NI R3 m ON ,S OL 41NUMB OM met. ImYR S OL 111.. Nal. MIL MOOR (477 MM. 04 11111.1A 510. Ns Rm1A nos F RBAA m v INV 6 Pa IMO. m v Nm 09 IMO 0m. 1eROD.1.• *544 809141 IMO SLI. 11001005Pw1r ATrm II .01 WOW MIN h5 MORO 30 10 0 20 RO 00 PL -1 oo 1•.40 LEDO() OIX [067101704 RECORD DATE CONTRACTOR DEFECTOR DATE Ca .E1E0 n 1E115100 ERIE REVD ala YAW 5.5 DAWN. 11111 901E 4401—.0 N 70100 R/4 019001 CRAM 01 000 04 r w. REV PENIS PROW= WEER 11E 91EAYISI0I 6 DA1F: .aR 170041 R.L.A. 3130 1009010 0: 041E ACTED RT: art: 0101•35 R. OMDIA 010114 6 P16LIC 100/C1TT 0411E01 R.C.E. 411215 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF FOLIC 3016 LAWNICAPE WPWOVERIENT PLAN PUCNANIA PARKWAY STA. 87444 TO 92*00 PLANT IMP PLAN. LEGEND AND NOTES 901 70. 2 cr 10 94£11 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION - 30% SUBMITTAL - 6/19/16 Rn 151118 Rn PIGIECT IN 'LACE COSTING R/N1IK 30 IRRIGATION SSSIOG. ALL WAKED Q MOM 13D95NE. AS I DILLT Cr IEE mamas. SOLI. AA RO4® IN KIKO. �u . iygN�/J/NJN /// lNii/N "j i/f. / /��//ik 1 % ! /Ni! ! NJJ/J!// i �Y� ;;iY,Yi ;7;;;� �x;;7/„'ni%„`9/,�`1/./;/H,!y!N'� ,�/1,'„�;U/„!l/„ !„fl./"„!N, ,1,,, /„ /��/,,;J ri ray,'ri:'.ir.:,'rl,;:YI.;;YG;;/!.'.:'/.: MIEET IN 0./Q EXISTING 0.311116 KID 11.10010N STUDS. NL PINKED CBI WANED LNG99E[. AS RE9LT OF NEI IIHpmIR, 9*.L E FOULED 1N 0110. 50101110. *081101 40 RDOCAIED OLIDR SIVA/ PECHANGA PARKWAY STOWED ONC. m. MIENTIN. LCCATION 6 RELODAIEO ODEN1 PROTECT IN PLACE ERISTINO WLANT11N NO IMIGT101 STS100. NL CNN= Ot RDOOD LNOSEA E. 55 IE9.LT END 1GICYODIIE. 9NIL EE 11A/CED IN RIM. WOLF VALLEY RD. Michael Baker 001110 MOM tee W. SURE 100 TEMPT, CA 92501 19S1 Wee INTE RNATION A L.+euero,m.cos rMv ,. ._ PECHANGA PARKWAY 4 11 t11, w.PP1m.w q'0D 3 -� r +- s s VIA EDUARDO N/1 SEE SHEET PL -1 FOR PLANTING LEGEND AND NOTES AND SHEET ID -1 FOR DETAILS ' m 0 D m a so PL -2 905.E 1'dP• LOXX-1000( CONDUCTION RECOG DATE WORK= 1I8ECTCN DAT0 COWIETED BY DATE NC'D ®DI NRR 1104.1. solcr INN • N•w. Ole TO Til• AT OW. N 1 lee AT OA siw.N ADO 1.111O IOIIZOON. AS 1610 0/4 4(2100 m DRAIN BY DECKED RT M W. K NABS PR[PO ED ODER TIE 9WERWi51ON DT DATE AN REEL R.L.A. 3152 000WDOED 91: DATE IimIED ND DATE TONS E. ONCIA 0 4 Cr "ALM TDRQ/CITT DGINEDI R.C.E.0.1 N2A CITY OF TEMECULA CEMRTINNT a RRIC 0055 LAJ SCAPC RlIpYBer PLAN Plc,wmA PARKWAY STA. 92+00 TO 10/+00 PLANT INC PLAN 905 G. 3 610 SHEETS NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION - 30% SUBMITTAL - 8/19/16 PROTECT IN RACE DISTMA MIMIC NO x� PROTECT MOVED LwOYM. 16 ROW El N} INRDTOpTS. - - - IN RIN). - - - fMll E RE}LMXD •,r..,.n... // U // /// // b / II/ /// rr;,�;,n,;:ur;:m;:/r„ai,;nnn,;;n,;;/i:;/,;;�;;;n.;;,i;:;i:;;i;';;i:';;�;;,,;,is,',h;:;il;;,%f,;;%/,r,9/r•,H,,,,r•/%!!/H.!/1r1/,!4/,,,//,;:r/9rS.,/.r„/,.,,/,,,, PECHANGA PARKWAY A c.w 101.00.' Michael Baker SUITE 100 TEMECULA CA 9259/ 1951 6.000 INTERNATIONALI�Nxn.cc. N. CASINO DRIVE NOTECT IN PLACE 01151100 44/64100 No IRRIDATIa SYSTEMS. AAL DAME® R REMOVED LAOSCAPE. AS RESAT Cr NEI 111100]0. *ALL E MERACED IN ROO. x;47.7:;, r r ,,; x.;r/ ;:i r;rl;r nrrrrnr rxrrrnrrrxrrrr rrrr rrrrrrr rr.. *12.00 TINED COC. TR 1Y PECHANGA PARKWAY X7 PROTECT IN RACE EXISTING RIM1NO I11.1104101 SYSTEM. ALL WAVED 0 R ROMEO U110SCOPE. AS NEWLY 6 NEM INPROGGIE NE. SAO. E RERK4D IN SINS VAM P ®C. 11P. /////////////""r /////////////////////////////////// // !%/////////////////////////////////////////"(eV ///// SEE SHEET PL -1 FOR PLANTING LEGEND AND NOTES AND SHEET ID -1 FOR DETAILS y W IL+ J (n O 0 O I- - LL W '93 O Z J m z 0 W Q to 20 10 0 20 W 00 SCE 1•,10' PL -3 LDXX-X100( 40104Th RECORD DAR Mr REVISIONS DATE ALC'0 Era Or 4ATRACIOR INSPECTOR DAR LUREIED ER.ATRERa':N PI 0.001.104 010 SAE 101112110. AS FORD 41100AL N/A DESIGNED m DUST BY DED® JA w. AC RN6 PEPAIED CROR TIE AEER0ISI02 DAR: JO0 A1p[1 R.L.A. SIM RECASO® BY: ACCEPTED R: DATE: DEWS R. DNCIA 01 DIIECT 4 6 R81C/1006/1111 OCINEER R.C.E. 0179 CI TY OF TEMECULA 00.041.011 a R6LIC 1101.6 LANDSCAPE MPROVE NNT PLAN PICHAMSA PAE[WAY STA. 104+00 TO 115+36 PLANTING PLAN %CET No. 4 6 10 00115 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION - 30% SUBMITTAL - 8/19/16 0 LL H 2 1 1. ARL LOCAL MRIOPAL 00 RATE INS. NILES AND REUVLAT.. MANNI3 0R RELATING 10 MR! PORTION 0E TIE MP ARE EES! RCOEODLIEO 510 AND WOE A PM Of DERE SPRYGIO S MO DEM PROMO. SPLs E CARRIED OUT n THE 2. 1 CONMAC133 901 NT*Y OE woods 6 .ALL MST. Unum. 5740005 ANO SENRCO BEPOE CMR0ONG WOOL. TE LO*TIM6 OF SOLUTES STRUCTURES AMO PRAM 9000 N TILE PLANS ARE APPIMNATE MET. A41 OSOIEWNOES WINTER HESE PLANS AND M103 FELD 0907016 90i1 E REPORTED 10 TE PTY. 3. 1 CONTACTOR SNE1 WAN M PERM.° O00Q190 PANS MOW BECN4,M3G R06C 0. 1 CI4PCIOR 901 WAN ALL 130(1171101 RANK REM6IE° 10 PERFORM TIE ROP LOCATED IE11011 WORE EC IG MORE. 5. INS OE904 6 OWRMR0TI0 5L EOUIRMIT SHORN N PALED MEAS 6 FOR OE510N MINTY WY MO 6 1O E WALLED RIM! PINNING MEAS WEEVER POMB11. I. 00 NOT SALMI" 06)31 M! MANION AS 9069H ON 1 PIN6 PEN T 6 MOUS N 1 ELD MT MOWN C010406 COST 1100 ROE NO MOLT AT TEE TIE MESE PLANS WEPE PREPARED. ANY RICH 000006 901E x0010 10 1 A11Q1a O 1 00011 ROIEIDOLME PEM CI[ 10 Mr NOR THE MRICAIOU CORTPCIOR 9W1 ISSUE 51 BE0S016NRY FOR AAI! FEED ONMWES OWED NECESSARY n 11E OM1. 1. NW/ ML EMMETT AS 904* N 1 EMUS MO SPECR1ATENS CONTRACTOR 900 E 1.1401660 10 COLPI1 PAIN LCF OTY, MINTY A010 PATE IEOMdM15 FOR EM EMMETT ARID INSTALLATION. E ACTON. LOCATION FOR 1 PONT OF CONECIIO* FOR 1 051E51C INTER EIER, CONTROLLER PAD 00 WALLA1d OF 1 MINMMC CO*TELL1R 6 10 E OEM. D N 1 FRO BY 1 0111/7 0. R. All PPE LACER PATO ARDS 70 E 5510!05 N A SPI 40 SLED. TWEE 1 METER OF 1 PPE 150.*RE 10001 PACO MEAS 10 E DISTAL= N TALA SOL 40 SLEEVE 1E 1021A RED TEED 10 MILT PAL *FE TERM. ARL SLEEVES TO E WV PED WITH A EE*M MUM .6 90n 01 1 SLEEVE 'ROWING ETA! (I-33) AR _MEET E SLEEVES 10 MOO Al LEASE I*• PS1 T 040 0E 00104T.g0O1. AIL S0DOS MALL E 7!05 PAM AEROSOL FOM AFTER 1 WE WNW. MO LEMMAS WE REIN MILLED. 10. ML MACE COLTER MONS 10 E NPM1ED N SINUS OR 000 COAST AEA* WERE PO551SLF. ALL OWL COPIER MANS TOE WIALLED A6 SHOWN OF 1 W1*31* 04 0TA4S 66951 ALL OMCE CONIOR 0105 WM lr OF P1EEeO. FIRGAMCN MATERIAL LEGEND 5711M. 340K/CT. WEL O. / MSOIP704 OTT PROM OWE H 1000 O TORO • SUTEER 4 MAIM P.m 11x!0 • SOw0R 1-510 E OMFOLD 6MM4N BALL WYE PMM VMS RML WITH DEEM C 10 -ARMC MMPI 0UR➢1 WERE U' 104 N COLOR CV- IOC -AS -II (I1 P000 EMM10 PLASTIC 104011 COMTIIM. RUE. ALV -1010 -AS -R (11 PIE594E ROUGED PLASTIC EMOTE CONTROL MLLE x615!05 WITH NEO 1 -311 -WS 1' W. MIMIPA 0D0 MLN 110 0790 1-1501 M 51YNfl1. 1 -61 -RR 1' SMS MWML x01 NLN 590E MLN ®L 'MIM GPM 10 AAE MOm/ 101-4MF NNE PRESSURE REGULATOR 70* DOWOS 1F5* TI)34 S MAL USE MOOED PM -MME NRE PRESUME 1100A101 FOR OM06* R -IR ITL. USE MOOR/ P0 -4014F NOME PESSIME EMPTOR FOR WINDS GIMLET 1104 1I LII. O TINA PLCO. MOOD 55-007 3/4' PLC 100E ME IRMO 10 WM 0-RM0 FLUSH ASSEMBLY. INSTALL 14006S 535-035. PC 5/r 1 . 1/Y SPIGOT WE ADAPTER UM I/O' 501. *0 LPI PLG SUP MATING. NO SLE! SPCA PRESUME COSPENSAU46 'MO 111191' OW DOTER. WONTR00 AT 509. 1 OM FOR SHRUBS MD 2 GPM MI TREES MR03W1E Lamm or EA5110 5' RC 000011 1E50 PPL FEED ROPY - PROTECT N RACE - 10PRCAMIE LOCATOR OF Dp51MG 1' PC PAR 154 MM4RE PPE, RPD moor - 10 E WON./ WNW R PLACE PACRE PLASTICS PC PM T d 116 S WARES N' SEW MMM PALOC PLASTICS UDR RC PPE 9.]H. b. 1' 049 O1L55 NOM.1E0 01105E 00 RM.. 00 010E PWC MAPICS RC PPE UN. O. 1. 99771£ INNRI'ESS MOf 100 01RR6E ON RMS S UAME4 4*' BELOW MAO 1750 PASTES N E PLPE OW 00 P11EEO. CC M OREM°° BP ISE CITY (T SO)WE N*p1 GN® OS -400 Tx FLIED ME ONE010. FOR ALL WE MBECBM6 AS 7 40D FULL BOLES FOR TIME $PUGS SHALL E LOCATE° APPROW07 * SLD FEET ON CENTER S EE0E0 AAO AT 1 ENDS Of NL MOW MEQ NNE°. PAL BORES 50LL E PV51C E2TANOMM WITH BOT CORN COVER SINKER *L NO E R13Am WITHOUT 531 MAONAL. NO WM. SRN. w soma BROOKS OR APPRO.ED EMM/ 40 95001 a MOVFO 78001040!. 0145IO6 710 CONCRETE MLN BOX PATH W4CEIE ID MMCATION comm. *RE N-14110 (SEE 3 000E H10*) .NO 50) 401 (UL ALARMED) lairk=" F IMAWE 1MGM Of 101! 10.17 112.1120..T71: 2.00' 0.20' 410' 1300' E 6 5 9 M 14 USAla V0.i MTO010 SEfAIOH WITMER MO ERE SUE 5 M*ED ON °PEPPING 0E MLN AT A W. N6 14 10. IS 000 10 4°. R I WILE N*6Q AIL 0 7 a* RIM ESTI. R/R ROVER O 66 r OM 14,0 AER ICAT IENv1N FOR ERIST TIO LED IW TEES. 'ILII IEID HAIR - POIFCT IM PLUM. Michael Baker TEMECIOA GO 92. 1951 IONAL * 4.. z C6IROCTI04 ECD OTE IEVISI06 DATE ACPD PECHANGA PARKWAY d 0- COMET - COMECT 10 01511E DEE EATEN* LLE - FIELD ERIF1 MITIMC10 INSPECTOR ME COINIIED 0191 TOP OF Oat IFC 100 • woe 610060 WI, PI 0 rem 110, 60110 10 0 9GALE MUOMP. NTT ICI N/4 SPECT EN VP/ LES 10 EE IS111G IBS IGAr104 IN INA NE. UI IL IS EXIST IND COIR CIE* - FIUD VEND7 03IDMD n Z. 11 f."` 01E0.0 BY RAA6 PREPARED MOE 1 91400151 CR O DAIS MOW B.L.A. 3151 ECOID® n: OATS: ACCEPTED n: DATE 1 SR. OMRCIA 0O ARE IC SO*6/C1n MINOR R.C.E. 46279 31.00 1 50 10 0 A tl SO 1-188-311-31 1-173-34E-31 1-58.1--30/-31 1-0,-701.11 -03-00 1-161-14 1 -7 -61 -1L1 -14 -IS 1 -b, -3y-1{ I -143-1y-0 I -L. -3y -M 1-33 4-.N 1-00 1-0 I -SL -3L -a0 CITY OF TEMECULA DFFARTIEDT O REEK ROTS LAImscAPE ININOYBe1T PLAN PUGIWIEA PARKWAY STA. 87.14 TO 92.00 IRRIGATION PLAN, LEGEND AND NOTES IR -1 LD)OE-)000( SLEET M. 5 O 10 9.15 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION - 30% SUBMITTAL - 8/19/16 /2010.:na IST10 PECHANGA PARKWAY arm 9'1141 + 1/0 rti-T-GFfi-F•F��FFT-I-H �H Fa -Y ARIUDWIE LT0110* Cr EXISTING 9 2-VED IIRIari0I 0llKXX[ 00 cam. tiRFi. FIELD 4011FT - 0IGIECT III RAC. WOLF VAI L. EY ar! I0AEC1 MI MACS TO 00111140 I0100T1OI WIIEIK. UTILIII 015110 03I10. HIES - FIELD VERNT • ti -H �w�FY-nti HyrtA'^�""•µ„+'�I-/nNrtH•I-I•rtHr H-hHrtlrtrt.��.YrH•Y-Hrtrt-ff-M-H�Irt��`+'•N+'rt HrtH-I-+�-h�-Y�NtHrthrt+ti-/ ti -I-IV+'- 1,..HMY-hyrtl• tH 0- w _ - 7 -----s W + WWO s S+ S s —100.014 s —i Michael Baker lag %Orr CENTE10R INTERNATIONALTEMECULA CA KW w,a.En11rLDOAlj012 I PECHANGA PARKWAY 10-1.00 + 1 L, ii `2 LA EDUAR_DO i M M SEE SHEET IR -1 FOR IRRIGATION LEGEND AND NOTES AND SHEET ID -1 & ID -2 FOR DETAILS 20 TO 0 20 A0 00 IR -2 10010ICTIOX RECOD 050E INSPECTOR PATE OONETED 41 IEVI1106 DAIS AOC•D 1001 000 =ILE 0112DnnM. 20 01014 TINA CE510ED 0 000w 112 Om® M M. AC . M RAS RVOED lOFR RE 01ERVISI00 6 CAI0 Mr. 14DR1 0.1.0. Mt IECONE20:0 Br: A[mTED ID: DATE: nein 1. EMCIA DIRCIOA Cr r1RIC gq/CIR E00m1 WILE 1.0 LDXX CITY OF TEMECULA DErcie1kfacr Cr RdIC 10,03 LANDSCAPE EPSOVENEMT PIAN PSONANSA PAIEWAY STA. 92+00 TO 104.00 IRRIGATION PLAN 916:1 0. 6 Cr 10 90015 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION - 30% SUBMITTAL - 8/19/16 —..,�-..-f...�....•P-.-f f -E -...1-T:iiiPM•..�...MA,.1-.y4l.Y�-v�riE-!•.. I R 1 M1d l0TE 1p0ATlm Of (415f116 IRMD 1 IRR1RAT104 MIMIC 00 cam. FIRES. flap *RIFF - 11DOCI IM /LICE. PECHANGA PARKWAY n : -- c- _: 2- E E- F E " E e . P - -h_..._ e ... r e - F w ,, .. X 1 A , , a . V 4 a , V -, 1 4 r',... t Fi.n.— ----0 Q-_v,------- a......•••••• im_ T L _-Y �. o -we.a- --- {-- -- n°° f- {-_—_ „ 0 o = PECHANGA PARKWAY Y EE WO Z m < = W H 0) Q CiWECT 40 00.40 70 014TI46 IRRIRATI2 wDt.11E. D11LIE Ek15106 010. EIRE - flap MIFF --} 1l. t N. CASINO DRIVE `X .t h C7Y� i 0 0 I- -IL -w O LLl Z J w = w UW � (n (4151116 IRRIDATICR MIIEIIE TO (4151116 1 ,/i' ODESTIC RATER — IETER, eE00LCR P40W4110. RASTER 002.E. 0301113LEt1 NO M X601 (K008118IEL0 1.100'1. 010.0 VERIFY - PROTECT I0 RACE IEEA TO 'PEEE011- EEOYMOE Rm MINIS RAW DATED t0/20/2C07 AEPI/ED R K1.190 OUP /O1 004111040. IKO IATI04. f10ECT lEE IRRICAT101 0I10.11E 10 (4151116 1000CETIOI 10,Ilt140. INSTILL 1O 010. TIDES AS IMAM (RAT04 (4I5TIK) - 010.0 VERIFY Michael .10 0.11.171 CE111153 DR. Baker �; u�B1 678.1042 ONAL 0408�IiaK.o10 1 SEE SHEET IR -1 FOR IRRIGATION LEGEND AND NOTES AND SHEET 0-1 & ID -2 FOR DETAILS 20 K 0 20 40 E0 sru: 1•m• IR -3 LOU -1000C CO6TRCT101 RECORD DATE BY 40015106 DATE 16'0 PEN BMX CONTRACTOR INSPECTOR DATE CWLETEO NS Mt 110, Or WS III IOC NIA' NUN At IN NVIONVIINI OF NV. NO FANO MN, 111.011.1.1 MO 504E 1d1110114. A5 FOND 4011/100, yA CAMPED K OWED ED .M1 FUNS MOWED TAW RE 9.IERYI5101 0' DA1E: .OR R61Et R.I.., 3152 J1 ZOE0EED .R DATE ACCEPTED R: DATG 1400 0. DECIA DIRECTED 6 RS IC 016/CITT 0611000 R.C.E. 402211 CITY OF TEMECULA RCNNgA PALMY STA. 104.00 TO 115.36 IRRIGATOIN PLAN OlNTR11T Or PLIC ROES DEET b. 7 6 10 DEErs NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION - 30% SUBMITTAL - 8/19/16 2 ri WE USG/KAMM TM MAK TRit TR, RAS e0 TAR AAu.i fROM.w.w PUEOLE NM WI. CAP WI aRAVEL PED FNISMO MADE MUM CITY OF TEMECULA DOUBLE STAKE TREE 5 GAL., 15 GAL, 24' BOX P-1 ..0.01611, STMLSOfna PAGOVAAPANIA • INCANOPAGIAM PIONONAPAPIA PIO•411.1.214, 11.1 Of a pLART twrOVII. 0.0.0T SP.. CITY OF TEMECULA DRIP EMITTER ASSEMBLY DETAIL I.8 1 Michael Baker 00810 COUNTY CENTER DP.. SUITE 100 TEMECULA CA 0301 IONALDwE $nc78.00.2 o1. .1. DORM. ROOT OrARRO. t NNW 0,41.161,0.1114[111314,11WOOMP,OOOTWOMMOW, WIRD TO MC WE OVAILS CITY OF TEMECULA 141.10.11MF FREE AREA tr ',wilt SEE VECTICATIONS . \ / TREE ROOT BARRIER P - 5 KO UDR FP. MON TOME OWE ORPEWIERfleftal, 10116=1.1.4 WINOS 641031.0001TO Sr MOO IMANIDO3 FLAW SEE KAMM MARS MIK CM AVCASAAAGAM sKW ,v:aI°AMMONIA .Iu W11a.nm.l.il.wMDSTAsass .11.04s. / CITY OF TEMECULA TREE DRIP LAYOUT I.9 CITY OF TEMECULA SHRUB PLANTING P-6 .VI ' ltlly.� L� iT —A IMPOVC VON MN ,131114111•01 =IBS LOnPIc.YI Vr.s.zR«.1Arwc MOT LP•OIN Cf SLIFf Ll.I– vw..K4.ow..v.1.1,014C,, LP( (S...wl W«..i CCMPEMYr.,D.EcCLE..w,MI. 10 ,1411011A.,1.0- ,4.11,01e.PlICSOIRC w.*w / CITY OF TEMECULA DRIP PRESSURE REGULATOR I. 10 AND CHECK VALVE DETAIL RES ROOT YU. 06,1A101M.,41.6 15.011U0OLER HEAD NE LEGEND o ars I i; 9 i Ma fINDOED - RAMS CAMFJOED SOL 4,41'. I 1124 = O WEE TRAK 3EF DETAILS 11.4 ROM 4LL OEMS 8/1011111115 8.1.11110 D'iKs MOM NOT, 6.101.13010.011: fe10.,f.COtzteoefopUIL000111., 00.% Y,ONOMOIEADVO1141. ROMP NOME 6,,OANOCO.TilLolOSCAPE Al.A.ANt OM* of. ikt.O00004K CITY OF TEMECULA TREE BUBBLERS I-6 / NOM CITY OF TEMECULA DRIP FLUSH ASSEMBLY 1- 11 / COGTMIRIOI WEEYEID DATE RNIWACTR INSPECTOR DATE CRHETED R IEV1110. DATE ACC'D MA APGAR IR IC MIT WHO IN •211 N. NC 1. NO ROW MR. LEE 101IwC0A- AS 10110 WA CIRIOED 51 CEA*. ET I•1. Ac C N FLPAG PAIDAPIED IIOR TIE SPERVISI01 6 DAR .DM MOO R.L.A. 3152 IEmWnem 0+ DAM A®1ED sY: DATE 110115.. GIA DIICIR 6 RELIC .GANG/CITY 0611.1111 —1:0EINETI4 VOW, ME OPAL 1.1r CITY OF TEMECULA POINT TO POINT DRIP IRRIGATION LAYOUT I-7 l ROOM., WILAIDROINDOOVEROVIRCE DOLLOP trr SERVED lo Rag REOLIIREOLE4.01.6RIDMMIE, ON "SOT CITY OF TEMECULA SINGLE OUTLET DRIP EMITTER DETAIL I-12 CITY OF TEMECULA m.D1oE TVLIC WRNS LANDSCAPE NIROIANNENT PLAN PNCIMNSA PA WAY STA 87.44 - STA 115.36 PLANTING & IRRIGATION DETAILS 1 ID -1 LDXX-)000( WET M. 8 0510 9W13 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION - 30% SUBMITTAL - 8/19/16 11144101. 40400 01814186 110010111404 01iui0 A0, 6„/ 41.111116.80101101..... o 60110118460•16. 2.601.2611.011468, 1.40040.81.41.18 0016. 86 6648.6 0.6 66 4664 6864.4 .40.61.10104.0118 11010416. MILT. AO. 040 46104. 00 606E8 1. 4010 1404.4144414).VAT44440 MK 000 40100 01111 61144.081 /1141.10140 11141.11,7, CITY OF TEMECULA MEDIAN DRIP IRRIGATION LAYOUT 1-14 / 410,8110411100 0614.. 464 • 04188141.02 40.06. 6-0 010106040841 060 6. .05 4401/1 4440 03111111616406810 VAAL 008,011048 PAM. 2.0601 8660 4111111140111416 18040.1104.4 04646.8066 04.1007/40 M0146450010. OI12 041140 .060 AM WPC 1064 wM0N1S 4.104114 11pI9Ilo. 1486611 C64140 Nea 6851001.0 MON. 1810 .114. 4460 +TA vwo0.4010om0050. 6116040 AD 6. 0.1.0136.14.028101460161404, 0,60801116 6.1116061. 41.6 WE 1416801114 0680101036101164•40011164.0.6 B009 12,64. 0 4001460116.1. SOW • 401601.0440 04110144011.64 6104 006.9004468016 CITY OF TEMECULA ♦ REMOTE CONTROL 1.28 VALVE m6101CT1a 1E0010 DATE 6 COM ACT01 119ECT01 DATE CO/IETED Michael Baker .810 COUPON COM OR., SATE WO 181.0.11ACA 0581 10 NA L 1.106,1;mio 1.411 4.6066•0844.6 1.1.6.04046100.668641 1101.41101,A4 r0.1 ACCT., 611.101100. 604.01141 4-0,64.•16 111•001010664 04,04 404111 0.641680.6111 81414004 WM. VW 10.860. 6,4016 1160.102 841,04 04.10106110.40. 000 ..600802001116/88 014860468 80646664011401.0 r1[ 640114Q 1116114.211•4100680 088 081.81441000 01.600.01r 40,0440 6A.4.Lr 30080•10 106446- 464-410. 4011.0.4. 60400 00.101640 616 .46 000110010048 44.106./ 601 00 MOW 6a01.A1616. ,. 10611.04400 Of /AV 66 DAV 264 014114 401.18 104. WI. CITY OF TEMECULA SMALL SLOPE/PARKWAY I-15 IRRIGATION LAYOUT 4.4686160,6.444 00681011846611411,001 61806010 EOM YEA, 111AVOICA 00 41.1.001•00 600 .4444,4,8 080011 346. 64/8-641.411.40(001/4010. 040 4•604.8 00404.46 001/4 PlYSI KW MOM. KE4141144 , .046 000.14046 410041 304.4.48 462.4.40611406/ 00. • CITY OF TEMECULA DRIP REMOTE CONTROL VALVE AND WYE FILTER ASSEMBLY 1-2P • > fir dr, ..•,..414. Am to A No Aka A 10.141011111160101441122161412 2422114/All. vAvc ito, PAW La 10 460606 040 841. 440 46.61.6 v.. N S,/ 01001146 0110160•645.0 04044 461/01.6.00164 4114. • CITY OF TEMECULA BALL VALVE 2' AND SMALLER 1-24 -6060 HOE_ 14.6 NOM 654011VALvE110.010.0•8411011411401,06 TO 1060/6 .1110440, WAWA. 0014 46.111001.0 4.01106040/011.104 44.6000.18.8. • WA, 6068 64016. .0101144.0•64811016.41 40 PANG 60E4 04011u:10.• C01114,002t0:411.18160.168•00181.0011.61C046.8 644 4404 010 0110 MI 00 SOX. .1116466161.0 4 100010 616. CITY OF TEMECULA VALVE BOX PLACEMENT 1.30 • ,.I111 �fl.� II 110618 " 101104.6.860 686.1.460 00.1.40.40.001/ 41401100 686. ;14,6 0040111 6.10610000 444 46 6.42460,64., 00 AR KA ot 14010 C64001000 .0606 5 004 06 14 Mk.- 04111,10.861/6 6414410 04 444 044 64.1. 3660001166 066 686.6,66.04 446660,640.4.046, 604 CITY OF TEMECULA GATE VALVE 212' AND LARGER I-25 a' 4/0600104 04.11 64 64 6861(6010. 81004 4600 FR 1.451C•ler SWAY TO PA. 0610060I168 0.761 - /66611µ1111.84 01.011. 010601.4.14 cwP0.�4w.' w•ww•.. *AO 411111, SET BKARE41,11444 4111w120844 E001 01:04 AA IT= /.401.111151101 mow 60.4406410404 6064. 04,114 1011.08101016108410 CITY OF TEMECULA MAINLINE AND VALVE MANIFOLD LAYOUT I-31 A011000608/4 4111.14/4 64.1.618 044.211011,0 04104 +«+n 01141.04.14640•61. wR . 440.6411011 WV SO 41. 4. TOP 0046 44. 44•64 SO, 146 4/464 66 AM eM01ma 16.8 004010411. 4818261,681106.48 10061110. 118 644/11001146 moon sow 119.1111111/3 010464401 4A110 011116006/466 060 85014641.4604. AT 066 6484010 WOW 4068 1.4t00•46A1•61440 101/0164 08064/ 011. 04046/00411615•41. CITY OF TEMECULA 141.06 QUICK COUPLER VALVE 1-27 IN VALVE BOX 1061464 610114 MOE 08611!011 .0860.61.40 A SCOW 2,02666/1 Ar sr' 24 MUM. *AYE ME 888 808180001014 AlW 10301.1.1•10 AT 61=0046.114 MI6 AMA. 0314011114111 2440 VAG. X 11010 60.64.406.6 016400.01,016. 460614114110 460101.0644 10641601114001,000,4 ALL •014010110146,00,11 406.6046 010001046 46 AS 11014100110161600014. CITY OF TEMECULA PIPE AND WIRE TRENCHING 1-32 ID -2 LDXX-max DATE /CC 'D DDOI ONO 021.-41 OEM am A WM 010 0. 16 III OM 11111( 1141.1 6111.1... 1. 40 1101111111107. 11.80104 141 101 SCALE 1021ID11T1t A9 •01ED 1V• YOIOED ST DSA5 R DEEMED VI w. •c 11211e MOWED I$W TIE SRDYISIa 6 DATE: 6114 .018. 8.1..0. 3152 38808061122 EE: DILE: •CTa!w EE D•TE- DIMS E. DATCIA 011.1601 6 11LIC 61186511+ DSI•S01 E.C.E. 4.518 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT 6 SIC 06 LAM:MAK N/NOVNIef PLAN PNONANIIA PANKOW STA 87444 - STA 115436 IRRIGATION DETAILS SETT 10. 9 6 10 9+519 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION - 30% SUBMITTAL - 8/19/16 a 5 ✓ OM kIAMAK. 1.41.1i 41.3. MO COMM. WIRES !MU [WED • 11,6 01,.,11310f COMA. AIIVE MAW WIRED NM. O. GLOM sow, 10.010.,F WW1. CRY OF TEMECULA SLEEVE TRENCHING 1-33 Michael Baker MECUAG.50t P,IONE876.1)0 INTERNATIONAL sm�cc XOTEF EL, '11 w, L MCPSMCVICATICen MCOMENAIOM MO PRESUME TWEAK. ME ISMCIFIC•11,018. CRY OF TEMECULA mr.E\ THRUST BLOCKS L I-34 NOM AIL INCRIM011,00,411.13.01.0e TOW 9.4.40 rMoitle, MASON, 1M. CRY OF TEMECULA PIPE ON GRADE I.36 • I NASEPPPOW 11.111.121,0, 111111JLATIM PRIOR 30 MAIM 111111 0.6.01011. Ware COMIECMR11.1.1 YEA MOM OMM. Bair SPLICZ MIL OCOMKOlt MM. CO.ECTO,r, p, Me +UM AMA VOATIVVROOI MAt110 W. 'NW ,11.0. Mt 140,1,01918.4.0 Men MM. 2M. •21, 3,141111,MR, TOELICTRICIalv COMFOr CRY OF TEMECULA WN4E CONNECTOR I.39 401. 41_ COMM,. IWUMS•YE,AE 1100•111:01Mity, 111,[6. CITY OF TEMECULA CONTROL WIRE , 1-40 PULL BOX ID -3 LDXX-XXXX CO6TnETON rano DAIS CONTRKC101 116KECT05 DATE COEEET5 RE11s106 DAIS Karo COOT - 11.11111 MIIIMICTIM PM, IV OETAINN OK MO IOIm TE AS NOTED DpIED T MON m CHE ED ET el, AC 0.056 PIEDDED UNDER TE SUPERVISION a DATE AN MOEI R.E.0. 3152 RCCPY:KED .T 00l1 ACCEPTED CM OAK DOME I. EECIA DIREC101 O' RELIC MY/CM ENOIMDI CITY OF TEMECULA OTYMEN1 or H.Ric SORTS DEET Ko. 10 UUMNICAPE YIIOYEIE NT PLAN PSCHA11YA PARKWAY STA 87.44 - STA 115+36 IRRIGATION DETAILS Or 10 94Ers NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION - 30% SUBMITTAL - 8/19/16 I Urn.arOT -------------w5'--- EROSION t SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES T MS NAL FILMED RIOIS01.110 PA SE SITE OR TO MIT T. E R A MM 6 ROUE R NEIL STOW INTER 0.100M SPSTM (ANON YTISOMM S. SMELTS. CTT.. mp1. 01*- v-01100. O 110. SY WNS. T INNIPCS. INLETS. WELTS. STC.). ALL IONPOMIITED DISOMI0 TSE 111710 ENO MIER.: MN SID. YETI COMET/MX MTI 0..10. 0. mm IIIIL1s 11 30110 1 (50.51. 0M10A0. MUFTI. INDENT.100.001. MOO Taal N EST NNETO! mamas (Nev. tau E 1100.0 R1. 70 Ian F100 ACMITIES Of w/0006 CIN E OD... AT 10-M110.110013.1211. 045110001 DOSIEvp1i. 0D 0,14111 01010 (EL) 100401 NWT E I0TM1*1 AL wD..AIND AMOR TO Aro 0000011 D1. EM 000.1.10.11.001000.1.10.11.001 I3E0 s61. RVI ESC EASIMS I . M Omar M DONT. 6 11 MO6i !. ALL MERSIN. 01S10..LINS. NINr1TINS NO NTE PILIK ACTIVITIES. MO. / WTI. . O® 1011.71K41MU I11K E SIE. M Ev¢W/O1[TIS ALL 1.06111E TOR.RI NA DIMON. PRM SNO.DCITS6. •. 01001.11WEEJWS. /COITION. ESC w1ERI. IPLL E SImPILO AT MAIO. LOCATION P. IYEOIATE 110 SIMIN WvEN DNS PRI. TO No E01LLSr (5 OflQM, 1000(01. M EKIDO CONSA C11..LL IMOTAEtr NATE EW IMOD MAS 11010A6 Av01L.1 TO .MELT M SITE. 2 taisictues, 111 0,C IE 4145 awl E Daum. ESTm. REPAIRED OR WOIMIS 15.10 010001 M SITE TO PROTECT AOIEIEI6. 00.70. MRT10. 1.1.10:TMIT WMITIK NEN ALIO ALL RIWNAIEIC NM CONC.. STSTl. IS AR 00:0101/ OA SRI100 OMIMS TAIL 0010 APIP IN EVENT. TOE EDECTIN CRS SIO E RAMIE. IN MIR RAE. a. I ii. ERI. 0.105.U. DOM ION. TO PALTINS 110 !.AEINIM KHAT. COVER. 11.11116(0( STMLED . RINE. BMETS 07.1. M AW CO 011.). PLASTIC MIIR (01X1011 101111). MiPIVODC wTS. TON -01C0171013 m ALL OPTIC. 0 MEAS. RAR ENMCS APPROVED N M CIT ELIAMR. JOT RCM. 90. POT E T® K SlMO-N0E MOM. ONDE. N RYES ROTI SINN T. ROME SINN 40 -LS NO EIS. 0®Em SIE. WADS401 KYE 50 MI0 TO A 60 44-/40 R M A STM0ISED SIE111R0 PROMS /PRIED L A INE Cr 10 NALE. CIT oDITEER INT MM. *MOW MKNUTIM YES 1a MILT. S.W.01013 .0. DaL¢ 1101 110 N. LIN. TO M NM MILTW. OIYD MAO. ;NOT RSCS. SILT PODS. 510 DIET 411 0(POLWIT/(/OLe1MINI. 5- 00.). OEM 006. DU NE ET .MEGRIM. ER. SEER MLS SEL E IINPLLID IN ISNOOT DOOdTS M SNE 6 M MM. SIL! MARX awl E INSTALLED MAU DODO. STREETS MO COMM. SIM 0.40.410 R SILT 10600.61161E M SIEtNN Ra -Oruro .INA 6001. a. SIISVP.4710,11.0./.. 105TH ISM HEST 015100. DAMS R ICES OE AO .TOE 6 NIL. M SITE 5001E 001 LIED M TAE COMINCTIO. WOW 51IERPIOTM (VRI NREM. RIX L0EL OTEYIW. TIT5.015E NAM MU M 001.100 STY INTO 1411ATI0 MENST1.EMS WM) COC.(INN) 9.1 E 401E0 TO -CIT RT. TO IS.WE Or • 0010 POSIT. 4NM .U. E 11.0000, TRI OMOST BASTION 0 M T ASKANS9014! E EMIL. ANIUM E TO CIT MD STATE IM9ECE6 . UPDATED n RnLECT OIRdT fIE 0011106 MINS INTER NONCOM NET E INSiRLID RIR TO N6 MPOI0 CTIv1T1ES. E2MINS OWL E LRIND m NOUS MT NM E IMOIANLT 1000 R DIMMED 4 ONOIWII EL EE459Owl 100000 MEMO AL DISH®NODSCr Y ®MWK EDP . IN M 040.10 Mo COX11[11. NNIS. MALL /LSO TO PPOTECTINI Michael Baker 4,810 COUNTY CENTER LIR. SUITE 0.400 INTERNATIONAL Amaaam.00 FUROR ST. • X11 0611[501. ACCESS POI. OWL E STNILIN, O M • OMIWTTMROD/ ANI 11104. 140-0 TES 10 O MEgN! 1101-01. MERIDA AOCESS MS (NL PM..0110.0.ITATERIPL 1A STOE APO MEL RMCIMAITS. ETC.) >WL NCI E PNTD1ED NM TOM 70 1.10T0510T 0.1 (0 OTO 1x1411151 STIOTS. RSTIN D9E SHORT N1N Nom MOM. 0( ALL . PAVED SNOTS OM .006 IS 011 1!.. MOAN ISM. OM./E MD MEM SDR, NEM. ®0 INMECTIM. 01 01ID STREET WINS OWL 041N ALMED RIR TO M MLIOTI. 0 9.LT EN RAR. APU ALT NO ALL 1EDINNT OD.IYE 11123 AR NOM.. NS. 051LTD0 WINS awl E ENO. CA01N N OANOT•S OSIi. 1. 50 Nx�IMMX0 INTER OWL . � DmIEo ONCE iTd IN M PPLO S 5«E 00.1110. *WM IN,R - CO MT ENTER... CO 0 00110E 0 MMMIK NSTIE..LL E POSTER. OSsNACAS Sou. OE .TR ARE TA6. ARTA. TOILETS. LIMO, nOm6. LAMOCA ILS NO 50.11.01 0 IL NNL E Sato 30004091 MIIYEIM6IC STY 171111 0.040X STNS. SIEINL16. RIOT6-a11n MAS RDRti IRO NO awL RK MOONS OTAINOM. IYCTIK NOMILLS 6 SOIL SIMLL E CONNED A! All ACTIN 110.110 !WL E 0400 PRIER TOA MAX. MIN e. m50(.401MOTESEMEM X4 101 MO . 0ISCM1.0 1 WINN >Mu E RAC. IN INTEL -1151 NW. NW ESO IOvim .LLL. POT E ALLRN. SIATI06 awl E P OIICED 11. CONTE. PAINS. SA.60 MO ODER LIWID INT, MoSIMLE LINED VIM MSTIC Alb MATED A0501151 MEPC RIOT-CryAn.NTA L .. ETC. PRI. TO NT FORECAST EN. B16 MO INlWITS Sou E OTO SIM LIDS CO PLASTIC 111.5. 10. lEIXISSIEL11011STOW INTI MOM ML AR E D.C.OR 100 0.35 111.0 101 OMENS 1MTAUID. ESC NAAI 0 C MATED. ALL MOND 11.001 /RM O.TIL 4SICIOTY011 LAM. IS 1./.1.3. 5010E aWl E 100 LW PROTECT. IN RAE RIR ID IMMIX 6 ELISION HTML NAM !WL NM RUSTIC 4000.1MN M T.MR AIM CO UAE PLI®. M DOmmILL NEC Cr M LOON TO CONTAIN DI 0101. NI. 501E MD OR(N*L0 LIC (4.0. . -00 NOMITOES. Iowa aaNA. RPM. 110100. 0.11.06. CR. ). 1103 VA. COW/PACE MM., MIX 0164 MN. SILT MOSS MO ESILTIN.S. SELL E n¢ 6 0/10rt. 000.101. wIR101. MASE. wSC^. A.a1a1 ONUS MD DETIMONTED FL NMIES 0R1010. TS 011116C.U.. L 500CTIE6.. 01 Ir SANS NOL E AND. EMM Tor ST. PATER OYfl'M STEM. MEW AL1pRT1E MYDaE FACILITIES INK MIDI ANNLONM CIT MMR. . IVR T. SEROUS POLO E. vItML.. 00110- . 04.10- EAITTETO. -.. -.�1 _.1.5 •_-4!., 111 .111:• 1:11 _1• •.._CIRRI-- 0 R5TN1 RATISC 160010100230 411 EEC IEEAI PECHANGA PARKWAY Eve PLEASE REFER TO THE SWPPP FOR ADDITIONAL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL REQUIREMENTS. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO ADHERE TO THE CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PERMIT, STATE WATER RESOURCE CONTROL BOARD. GRAVE.BA0 SPACING TABLE 51R0ET .NE CiT. IMT 0I V Q Nev. IIT FEW 1,100C101 RR EIRE IEEO. 1I UPSON AND BEMENT CONTROL LEGEND CM -N. -SYS INT NOV1R*M MADSE CE DEM. Cr TDR LOOM 40 m 0 w L 120 I I I SECTION AA -AA POT m SCALE COB OCE AA O TYPICAL STREET OEAVELBAO PLACI364T DETAL IAT 10 SULE ©1 =1 • is • 1-....111• 1 R POT TO ERNE 06TRIXTI. E00 DATE CONTRACTOR INSPECT. SE COMPLETED n 101111106 INE 16.0 0001 WRR ▪ M>fl�LMOS' • TO TM If RE MPtr M. 7. NIMMOSIM mr. No now MINT. D ONT. MA NIA SUES 1.112.!*. AS PASTED MERMEN. 0/A DESK. D 610 DI10100 N 0000 010 6 PL116 IEPMED LEVE M NJERV151.6 DATE: ETWCI90/ X18110 JI. R.C.E. SSC EOMI® 61: SIE: ACCEPTED N: SE: TENS S. DAR.IA DIRECT. 6 .EIC MSyCIT 01000. R.C.E. 482. [TTY OF TEAECULA rNVJL1I W. PM 13-14 010.7100 6 N6LIC SOME STREET IMPROVEMENT PLAN PEWANOA PARKWAY EROSION CONTROL PLAN NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION - 30% SUBMITTAL - 8/19/16 VIA EDUARDO PECHANGA PARKWAY PECHANGA PARKWAY Michael Baker .10 COUNT, CENTER INE. SURE TEEM,. GWEN ZONAL avwr�mcr'0O TO 0 • m scary: 1'-w' NORTH CAS IND DRIVE EROSION AND BE ENT CONIAOL NDTE@ O MsrAu o AWLBAC r€LObn MDUaRS KR arAE AEW Qz STALL ar nova aoorzrna KR or MA rK.aw. @1OBIQN MD SEDIMENT CONTROL LEGEND opppp aur¢ BALD RAE WNW ar 1E1. arECTd 6 RDE 1m m6EaErIM RECORD diE caoymcoot INSPECTOR aIE CMETED BY BEVIBION art MOS -IM KIM I NNONNLNEM Vow. Ili 00 FTENT SEEM ILIONt ON NA e.r KNIZMTK AS MEED PEAT ICAC OERIacD BY CRAM BY ORO= BY Cr no 1116 REAMED amt TIE SEEMIBIM 6 DAM: FW.SCI I61I101EZ J1. B.C.[. BIM MECDEEI® BY: DATE: AA¢r1m et DATE CT E. DVCIA DIRECTOR TR MAGIC EM6.YCITY ENGINEER B.C.E. NQIE 4OF TEI`ECULA DEMBlIE1IT a PMLIC EDa6 STREET NAPROVEHEMT PLAN PEGUNCA PARKWAY EROSION CONTROL PLAN aEET M. 2 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION - 30% SUBMITTAL - 8/19/16 Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Pechanga Parkway Widening Appendix 3: Soils Information Geotechnical Study and Other Infiltration Testing Data -45- USDA United States Department of Agriculture \ RCS Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local participants Custom Soil Resource Report for Western Riverside Area, California August 19, 2016 P reface Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas. They highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information about the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for many different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban planners, community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers. Also, conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste disposal, and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand, protect, or enhance the environment. Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil properties that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions. The information is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of soil limitations on various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for identifying and complying with existing laws and regulations. Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some cases. Examples include soil quality assessments (http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/ nrcs/main/soils/health/) and certain conservation and engineering applications. For more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center (http:// offices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agency=nres) or your NRCS State Soil Scientist (http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/soils/contactus/? cid=nres142p2_053951). Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as septic tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to basements or underground installations. The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National Cooperative Soil Survey. Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available through the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means 2 for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. 3 Contents Preface 2 How Soil Surveys Are Made 5 Soil Map 7 Soil Map 8 Legend 9 Map Unit Legend 10 Map Unit Descriptions 10 Western Riverside Area, California 12 AtD2—Arlington and Greenfield fine sandy loams, 8 to 15 perc ent slopes, eroded 12 GhC—Gorgonio loamy sand, 0 to 8 percent slopes 14 GtA—Grangeville fine sandy loam, drained, 0 to 2 percent sl opes 15 GyA—Greenfield sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes 16 HcC—Hanford coarse sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes 17 HgA—Hanford fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes 19 RmE3—Ramona and Buren sandy loams, 15 to 25 percent slopes, severely eroded 20 VmA—Visalia fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes 22 References 24 4 How Soil Surveys Are Made Soil surveys are made to provide information about the soils and miscellaneous areas in a specific area. They include a description of the soils and miscellaneous areas and their location on the landscape and tables that show soil properties and limitations affecting various uses. Soil scientists observed the steepness, length, and shape of the slopes; the general pattern of drainage; the kinds of crops and native plants; and the kinds of bedrock. They observed and described many soil profiles. A soil profile is the sequence of natural layers, or horizons, in a soil. The profile extends from the surface down into the unconsolidated material in which the soil formed or from the surface down to bedrock. The unconsolidated material is devoid of roots and other living organisms and has not been changed by other biological activity. Currently, soils are mapped according to the boundaries of major land resource areas (MLRAs). MLRAs are geographically associated land resource units that share common characteristics related to physiography, geology, climate, water resources, soils, biological resources, and land uses (USDA, 2006). Soil survey areas typically consist of parts of one or more MLRA. The soils and miscellaneous areas in a survey area occur in an orderly pattern that is related to the geology, landforms, relief, climate, and natural vegetation of the area. Each kind of soil and miscellaneous area is associated with a particular kind of landform or with a segment of the landform. By observing the soils and miscellaneous areas in the survey area and relating their position to specific segments of the landform, a soil scientist develops a concept, or model, of how they were formed. Thus, during mapping, this model enables the soil scientist to predict with a considerable degree of accuracy the kind of soil or miscellaneous area at a specific location on the landscape. Commonly, individual soils on the landscape merge into one another as their characteristics gradually change. To construct an accurate soil map, however, soil scientists must determine the boundaries between the soils. They can observe only a limited number of soil profiles. Nevertheless, these observations, supplemented by an understanding of the soil -vegetation -landscape relationship, are sufficient to verify predictions of the kinds of soil in an area and to determine the boundaries. Soil scientists recorded the characteristics of the soil profiles that they studied. They noted soil color, texture, size and shape of soil aggregates, kind and amount of rock fragments, distribution of plant roots, reaction, and other features that enable them to identify soils. After describing the soils in the survey area and determining their properties, the soil scientists assigned the soils to taxonomic classes (units). Taxonomic classes are concepts. Each taxonomic class has a set of soil characteristics with precisely defined limits. The classes are used as a basis for comparison to classify soils systematically. Soil taxonomy, the system of taxonomic classification used in the United States, is based mainly on the kind and character of soil properties and the arrangement of horizons within the profile. After the soil scientists classified and named the soils in the survey area, they compared the 5 Custom Soil Resource Report individual soils with similar soils in the same taxonomic class in other areas so that they could confirm data and assemble additional data based on experience and research. The objective of soil mapping is not to delineate pure map unit components; the objective is to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. Each map unit is defined by a unique combination of soil components and/or miscellaneous areas in predictable proportions. Some components may be highly contrasting to the other components of the map unit. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The delineation of such landforms and landform segments on the map provides sufficient information for the development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas. Soil scientists make many field observations in the process of producing a soil map. The frequency of observation is dependent upon several factors, including scale of mapping, intensity of mapping, design of map units, complexity of the landscape, and experience of the soil scientist. Observations are made to test and refine the soil - landscape model and predictions and to verify the classification of the soils at specific locations. Once the soil -landscape model is refined, a significantly smaller number of measurements of individual soil properties are made and recorded. These measurements may include field measurements, such as those for color, depth to bedrock, and texture, and laboratory measurements, such as those for content of sand, silt, clay, salt, and other components. Properties of each soil typically vary from one point to another across the landscape. Observations for map unit components are aggregated to develop ranges of characteristics for the components. The aggregated values are presented. Direct measurements do not exist for every property presented for every map unit component. Values for some properties are estimated from combinations of other properties. While a soil survey is in progress, samples of some of the soils in the area generally are collected for laboratory analyses and for engineering tests. Soil scientists interpret the data from these analyses and tests as well as the field -observed characteristics and the soil properties to determine the expected behavior of the soils under different uses. Interpretations for all of the soils are field tested through observation of the soils in different uses and under different levels of management. Some interpretations are modified to fit local conditions, and some new interpretations are developed to meet local needs. Data are assembled from other sources, such as research information, production records, and field experience of specialists. For example, data on crop yields under defined levels of management are assembled from farm records and from field or plot experiments on the same kinds of soil. Predictions about soil behavior are based not only on soil properties but also on such variables as climate and biological activity. Soil conditions are predictable over long periods of time, but they are not predictable from year to year. For example, soil scientists can predict with a fairly high degree of accuracy that a given soil will have a high water table within certain depths in most years, but they cannot predict that a high water table will always be at a specific level in the soil on a specific date. After soil scientists located and identified the significant natural bodies of soil in the survey area, they drew the boundaries of these bodies on aerial photographs and identified each as a specific map unit. Aerial photographs show trees, buildings, fields, roads, and rivers, all of which help in locating boundaries accurately. 6 Soil Map The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of soil map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit. 7 489200 489500 Custom Soil Resource Report Soil Map 491000 ", tt... sz: • • . ,i., ? • 3 . A.." . , .7„,.., Afr:Zat. . .. "a, • • , . 7 , _ . .;.• . .11,‘' a 11 - t... ' , -. . ''..,,, ' '1". 41EN: ''''''' ° k, , _ K., .... • f• 4 . t 'it' it....i., 4,' a 1 . ..' VrtiA , .., ..„ ,.„ .., „.N., ifi ...- • ., ' 1-.' .7.f 4,741.4;i,. ..0 '4:s.11'" . - - 1', ! c ft, • it ' ,t1. 4. . • , . - 0. .., 6 .Z*44 4,.. 416 . , -•‘; ' y , ...% .' i ' ... 7... -V „., .,„.., to- ...:•• , :,.t.,, •-- ,..: ,,,,,,,i;',!•41 tat. " ' GtA ,.:,,,,,.. i --gc. , ,,,k.' 46)*"' - \ Is' - IF *a &Wt.' i ., . . • t. 444:tit. 4.'.; A., 1 i AIF • 1.- 'ff,,,, --. V- ' s;. 4,,-- vt w .. /10 t. ,... . N.N. •.,, \••*$-. A ;I. . ,. _. ,,...„61fii-', .k , .... Oi-- -,. • ai., § ,,,,,, v . i , -. - , It '''':,, 7 o• o [.,., • ''''t ik- . ". 4.1. . ,., ' .3,;N• .....!...*X4,....: a., . ....-- ttitirat4, ' .. ':** '‘..7:* ' 141. p -0 r* .• • ' . -*. . * ' . •,,N 47-1,tit. • A '..* vzic,.....4..... .•••1Z% ' ' ' ..<,, \ f •Ii ., . .4;,. .4;,,-,Seiko,ii. -4, • . -i • It. tt9,41' . 4. ...„1.-.05, • ..., .,.. ,d, ''. "\•::. • .•,,,,. Irb'Vt.' .,,,G y •Pk: a. ...,„ „„ t • . ... i . ,`- ,411k1D2: .!...''',, ,-, • - k.,...- 4„, , . ,;, *; %..• - i to - ... ..r ". 'AV, ' it — -....... , a.. • Ate ,..*, ,e • ,..e .,. "- i 4t......* ong,4 6. 1, ..) •• • - " d, .'''' ." At' t• ,f, ' *4. . , ..,," ..,44. ...,. - =... , • „ HCC ... :'..:., .,.... _. . , ..,... ,5.-,....,,...tr ti ' .44. . c? ) * :''' - -- - ' , • 4' ' - • \ V• , Map Scale: 1:13,800 t printed on A landscape (11 x 8.5) sheet N 0 200 400 800 Meters 1200 11 0 500 1000 2000 Feet 3000 Map projedion: Web Mercator Comer coodinates: W�84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 11N WGS84 8 33° 287N 33° 27 4 N Custom Soil Resource Report MAP LEGEND Area of Interest (AOI) Area of Interest (AOI) Soils ■ Special Point Features LJ Blowout • Borrow Pit X Clay Spot Closed Depression • Gravel Pit Gravelly Spot • Landfill • Lava Flow 4, , Marsh or swamp 'f' ` Mine or Quarry • Miscellaneous Water • Perennial Water Rock Outcrop Saline Spot Sandy Spot Severely Eroded Spot • Sinkhole Slide or Slip Sodic Spot Soil Map Unit Polygons Soil Map Unit Lines Soil Map Unit Paints Spoil Area Stony Spot Very Stony Spot Wet Spot Other Special Line Features Water Features Streams and Canals Transportation i -F+ Rails Interstate Highways US Routes Major Roads Local Roads Background . Aerial Photography MAP INFORMATION The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:15,800. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map measurements. Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL: http://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857) Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required. This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Western Riverside Area, California Survey Area Data: Version 8, Sep 22, 2015 Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000 or larger. Date(s) aerial images were photographed: May 3, 2010—Feb 26, 2015 The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. 9 Custom Soil Resource Report Map Unit Legend Western Riverside Area, California (CA679) Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of A01 AtD2 Arlington and Greenfield fine sandy loams, 8 to 15 perc ent slopes, eroded 0.1 0.1% GhC Gorgonio loamy sand, 0 to 8 percent slopes 4.0 10.5% GtA Grangeville fine sandy loam, drained, 0 to 2 percent sl opes 6.3 16.4% GyA Greenfield sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes 12.3 32.3% HcC Hanford coarse sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes 0.2 0.5% HgA Hanford fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes 10.5 27.6% RmE3 Ramona and Buren sandy loams, 15 to 25 percent slopes, severely eroded 2.7 7.1% VmA Visalia fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes 2.1 5.4% Totals for Area of Interest 38.1 100.0% Map Unit Descriptions The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit. A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class. Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils. Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They generally 10 Custom Soil Resource Report are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and miscellaneous areas on the landscape. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however, onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas. An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions. Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil properties and qualities. Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement. Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness, salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series. Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas. These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups. A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps. The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar in all areas. Alpha -Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example. An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar. Alpha - Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example. An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example. Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example. 11 Custom Soil Resource Report Western Riverside Area, California AtD2—Arlington and Greenfield fine sandy loams, 8 to 15 perc ent slopes, eroded Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: hcr6 Elevation: 100 to 3,500 feet Mean annual precipitation: 9 to 20 inches Mean annual air temperature: 63 degrees F Frost -free period: 200 to 320 days Farmland classification: Not prime farmland Map Unit Composition Greenfield and similar soils: 35 percent Arlington and similar soils: 35 percent Unnamed, severely eroded: 20 percent Minor components: 10 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Arlington Setting Landform: Alluvial fans Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread Down-slope shape: Concave Across -slope shape: Convex Parent material: Alluvium derived from granite Typical profile H1 - 0 to 11 inches: fine sandy loam H2 - 11 to 24 inches: sandy loam H3 - 24 to 36 inches: cemented H4 - 36 to 47 inches: coarse sandy loam, loamy coarse sand H4 - 36 to 47 inches: Properties and qualities Slope: 8 to 15 percent Depth to restrictive feature: 24 to 40 inches to duripan Natural drainage class: Well drained Runoff class: High Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately low to moderately high (0.06 to 0.20 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Calcium carbonate, maximum in profile: 5 percent Salinity, maximum in profile: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos/cm) Available water storage in profile: Low (about 3.2 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 4e Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4e Hydrologic Soil Group: C Ecological site: LOAMY (1975) (R019XD029CA) 12 Custom Soil Resource Report Hydric soil rating: No Description of Greenfield Setting Landform: Alluvial fans Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread Down-slope shape: Concave Across -slope shape: Convex Parent material: Alluvium derived from granite Typical profile H1 - 0 to 26 inches: fine sandy loam H2 - 26 to 43 inches: fine sandy loam H3 - 43 to 60 inches: loam H4 - 60 to 70 inches: stratified loamy sand to sandy loam Properties and qualities Slope: 8 to 15 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Well drained Runoff class: Low Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Calcium carbonate, maximum in profile: 5 percent Salinity, maximum in profile: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos/cm) Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 8.3 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 4e Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4e Hydrologic Soil Group: A Ecological site: LOAMY (1975) (R019XD029CA) Hydric soil rating: No Description of Unnamed, Severely Eroded Properties and qualities Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Minor Components Greenfield Percent of map unit: 10 percent Hydric soil rating: No Custom Soil Resource Report GhC—Gorgonio loamy sand, 0 to 8 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: hcvb Elevation: 20 to 3,000 feet Mean annual precipitation: 10 to 25 inches Mean annual air temperature: 57 to 63 degrees F Frost -free period: 250 to 310 days Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance Map Unit Composition Gorgonio and similar soils: 85 percent Minor components: 15 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Gorgonio Setting Landform: Alluvial fans Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread Down-slope shape: Linear Across -slope shape: Linear Parent material: Alluvium derived from granite Typical profile H1 - 0 to 15 inches: loamy sand H2 - 15 to 60 inches: stratified gravelly loamy sand to gravelly loamy fine sand Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 8 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Somewhat excessively drained Runoff class: Negligible Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High to very high (5.95 to 19.98 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: Rare Frequency of ponding: None Available water storage in profile: Low (about 3.4 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 3s Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4e Hydrologic Soil Group: A Ecological site: SANDY (1975) (R019XDO35CA) Hydric soil rating: No 14 Custom Soil Resource Report Minor Components Soboba Percent of map unit: 5 percent Hydric soil rating: No Hanford Percent of map unit: 5 percent Hydric soil rating: No Tujunga Percent of map unit: 5 percent Hydric soil rating: No GtA—Grangeville fine sandy loam, drained, 0 to 2 percent sl opes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: hcvn Elevation: 10 to 1,800 feet Mean annual precipitation: 12 inches Mean annual air temperature: 63 degrees F Frost -free period: 200 to 270 days Farmland classification: Prime farmland if irrigated and drained Map Unit Composition Grangeville and similar soils: 85 percent Minor components: 15 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Grangeville Setting Landform: Alluvial fans Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread Down-slope shape: Linear Across -slope shape: Linear Parent material: Alluvium derived from granite Typical profile H1 - 0 to 36 inches: fine sandy loam H2 - 36 to 64 inches: sandy loam Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 2 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Moderately well drained Runoff class: Very low Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High (1.98 to 5.95 in/hr) Depth to water table: About 0 inches Frequency of flooding: Rare Frequency of ponding: None 15 Custom Soil Resource Report Calcium carbonate, maximum in profile: 5 percent Salinity, maximum in profile: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos/cm) Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 8.0 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 1 Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3c Hydrologic Soil Group: A/D Ecological site: SANDY BASIN (R019XDO7OCA) Hydric soil rating: No Minor Components Dello Percent of map unit: 10 percent Hydric soil rating: No Traver Percent of map unit: 4 percent Hydric soil rating: No Unnamed Percent of map unit: 1 percent Hydric soil rating: No GyA—Greenfield sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: hcvv Elevation: 100 to 3,500 feet Mean annual precipitation: 9 to 20 inches Mean annual air temperature: 63 degrees F Frost -free period: 200 to 300 days Farmland classification: Prime farmland if irrigated Map Unit Composition Greenfield and similar soils: 85 percent Minor components: 15 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Greenfield Setting Landform: Alluvial fans, terraces Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread Down-slope shape: Linear Across -slope shape: Linear Parent material: Alluvium derived from granite Typical profile H1 - 0 to 26 inches: sandy loam H2 - 26 to 43 inches: fine sandy loam 16 Custom Soil Resource Report H3 - 43 to 60 inches: loam H4 - 60 to 72 inches: stratified loamy sand to sandy loam Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 2 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Well drained Runoff class: Very low Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: Rare Frequency of ponding: None Salinity, maximum in profile: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos/cm) Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 8.3 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 1 Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3c Hydrologic Soil Group: A Ecological site: LOAMY (1975) (R019XD029CA) Hydric soil rating: No Minor Components Hanford Percent of map unit: 10 percent Hydric soil rating: No Pachappa Percent of map unit: 2 percent Hydric soil rating: No Arlington Percent of map unit: 2 percent Hydric soil rating: No Unnamed Percent of map unit: 1 percent Hydric soil rating: No HcC—Hanford coarse sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: hcw2 Elevation: 150 to 900 feet Mean annual precipitation: 9 to 20 inches Mean annual air temperature: 63 to 64 degrees F Frost -free period: 250 to 280 days Farmland classification: Prime farmland if irrigated 17 Custom Soil Resource Report Map Unit Composition Hanford and similar soils: 85 percent Minor components: 15 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Hanford Setting Landform: Alluvial fans Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread Down-slope shape: Linear Across -slope shape: Linear Parent material: Alluvium derived from granite Typical profile H1 - 0 to 8 inches: coarse sandy loam H2 - 8 to 40 inches: fine sandy loam H3 - 40 to 60 inches: stratified loamy sand to coarse sandy loam Properties and qualities Slope: 2 to 8 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Well drained Runoff class: Low Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High (1.98 to 5.95 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 7.0 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 2e Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3e Hydrologic Soil Group: A Ecological site: SANDY (R020XDO12CA) Hydric soil rating: No Minor Components Greenfield Percent of map unit: 5 percent Hydric soil rating: No Ramona Percent of map unit: 5 percent Hydric soil rating: No Tujunga Percent of map unit: 2 percent Hydric soil rating: No Unnamed Percent of map unit: 2 percent Hydric soil rating: No Unnamed Percent of map unit: 1 percent Hydric soil rating: No 18 Custom Soil Resource Report HgA—Hanford fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: hcw7 Elevation: 150 to 900 feet Mean annual precipitation: 9 to 20 inches Mean annual air temperature: 63 to 64 degrees F Frost -free period: 250 to 280 days Farmland classification: Prime farmland if irrigated Map Unit Composition Hanford and similar soils: 85 percent Minor components: 15 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Hanford Setting Landform: Alluvial fans Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread Down-slope shape: Linear Across -slope shape: Linear Parent material: Alluvium derived from granite Typical profile H1 - 0 to 8 inches: fine sandy loam H2 - 8 to 40 inches: fine sandy loam H3 - 40 to 60 inches: stratified loamy sand to coarse sandy loam Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 2 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Well drained Runoff class: Very low Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High (1.98 to 5.95 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: Rare Frequency of ponding: None Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 7.0 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 1 Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3c Hydrologic Soil Group: A Ecological site: LOAMY (1975) (R019XD029CA) Hydric soil rating: No Custom Soil Resource Report Minor Components Greenfield Percent of map unit: 5 percent Hydric soil rating: No Ramona Percent of map unit: 5 percent Hydric soil rating: No Tujunga Percent of map unit: 5 percent Hydric soil rating: No RmE3—Ramona and Buren sandy loams, 15 to 25 percent slopes, severely eroded Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: hcyj Elevation: 250 to 3,500 feet Mean annual precipitation: 10 to 20 inches Mean annual air temperature: 63 degrees F Frost -free period: 230 to 320 days Farmland classification: Not prime farmland Map Unit Composition Ramona and similar soils: 45 percent Buren and similar soils: 40 percent Minor components: 15 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Ramona Setting Landform: Alluvial fans, terraces Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread Down-slope shape: Concave Across -slope shape: Convex Parent material: Alluvium derived from granite Typical profile H1 - 0 to 8 inches: sandy loam H2 - 8 to 17 inches: fine sandy loam H3 - 17 to 68 inches: sandy clay loam H4 - 68 to 74 inches: gravelly sandy loam Properties and qualities Slope: 15 to 25 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Well drained Runoff class: Very high 20 Custom Soil Resource Report Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high (0.20 to 0.57 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Calcium carbonate, maximum in profile: 1 percent Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 8.4 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 6e Hydrologic Soil Group: C Ecological site: LOAMY (1975) (R019XD029CA) Hydric soil rating: No Description of Buren Setting Landform: Alluvial fans, terraces Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread Down-slope shape: Linear Across -slope shape: Convex, linear Parent material: Alluvium Typical profile H1 - 0 to 12 inches: sandy loam H2 - 12 to 28 inches: loam H3 - 28 to 37 inches: loam H4 - 37 to 52 inches: cemented Properties and qualities Slope: 15 to 25 percent Depth to restrictive feature: 37 to 40 inches to duripan Natural drainage class: Well drained Runoff class: Very high Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Very low to moderately low (0.00 to 0.06 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Calcium carbonate, maximum in profile: 1 percent Salinity, maximum in profile: Nonsaline to slightly saline (0.0 to 4.0 mmhos/cm) Available water storage in profile: Low (about 5.5 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 6e Hydrologic Soil Group: C Ecological site: LOAMY (1975) (R019XD029CA) Hydric soil rating: No Minor Components Ramona Percent of map unit: 5 percent Hydric soil rating: No 21 Custom Soil Resource Report Buren Percent of map unit: 5 percent Hydric soil rating: No Hanford Percent of map unit: 5 percent Hydric soil rating: No VmA—Visalia fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: hczv Elevation: 600 to 1,200 feet Mean annual precipitation: 15 inches Mean annual air temperature: 57 degrees F Frost -free period: 200 to 260 days Farmland classification: Prime farmland if irrigated and drained Map Unit Composition Visalia and similar soils: 85 percent Minor components: 15 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Visalia Setting Landform: Alluvial fans Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread Down-slope shape: Linear Across -slope shape: Linear Parent material: Alluvium derived from granite Typical profile H1 - 0 to 18 inches: fine sandy loam H2 - 18 to 60 inches: sandy loam Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 2 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Somewhat poorly drained Runoff class: Very low Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High (1.98 to 5.95 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: Rare Frequency of ponding: None Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 7.2 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 1 Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3c 22 Custom Soil Resource Report Hydrologic Soil Group: A Ecological site: LOAMY (1975) (R019XD029CA) Hydric soil rating: No Minor Components Hanford Percent of map unit: 5 percent Hydric soil rating: No Gorgonio Percent of map unit: 5 percent Hydric soil rating: No Tujunga Percent of map unit: 5 percent Hydric soil rating: No References American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). 2004. Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling and testing. 24th edition. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00. Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of wetlands and deep -water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service FWS/OBS-79/31. Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States. Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States. Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric soils in the United States. National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries. Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/ detail/national/soils/?cid=nres142p2_054262 Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/ nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres142p2_053577 Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy. 11th edition. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/ portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres142p2_053580 Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands Section. United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical Report Y-87-1. United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. National forestry manual. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/ home/?cid=nres 142p2_053374 United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. National range and pasture handbook. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/ detail/national/landuse/rangepasture/?cid=stelprdb 1043084 24 Custom Soil Resource Report United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. National soil survey handbook, title 430 -VI. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/ nres/detail/soils/scientists/?cid=nres 142p2_054242 United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States, the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 296. http://www. nres. usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/? cid=nres142p2_053624 United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210. http:// www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcs142p2_052290.pdf 25 Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Pechanga Parkway Widening Appendix 4: Historical Site Conditions Phase I Environmental Site Assessment or Other Information on Past Site Use N/A Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Pechanga Parkway Widening Appendix 5: LID Infeasibility LID Technical Infeasibility Analysis - 47 - Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Pechanga Parkway Widening Appendix 6: BMP Design Details BMP Sizing, Design Details and other Supporting Documentation - 48 - Table D.4.1 DCV Calculations for LID BMPs DMA Type/ID DMA (square feet) Post -Project Surface Type Effective Impervious Fraction, If DMA Runoff Factor DMA Areas x Runoff Factor Curb Inlet Filter Insert A [A] [A] [8] [8] [C] [A] x [C] 75,930 DMA 1 244,330 Concrete or Asphalt 1.00 0.892 217,942 Design Storm Depth (in) DCV, VBMP (cubic feet) Proposed Volume on Plans (cubic feet) ' - 1 75,930 1 1 244,330 1 217,942 0.95 1 17,2541 Table D.4.2 DCV Calculations for LID BMPs DMA Type/ID DMA (square feet) Post -Project Surface Type, Effective Impervious Fraction, 4Factor DMA Runoff DMA Areas x Runoff Factor Curb Inlet Filter Insert 8 [A] [A] [8] [B] [C] [A] x [C] 75,930 DMA 2 64,860 Concrete or Asphalt 1.00 0.892 57,855 Design Storm Depth (in) DCV, VBMP (cubic feet) Proposed Volume on Plans (cubic feet) - 1 75,930 1 67,730 1 64,8601 57,855 0.95 1 4,5801 Table D.4.3 DCV Calculations for LID BMPs DMA Type/ID DMA (square feet) Post -Project Surface Type Effective Impervious Fraction, Ir DMA Runoff Factor DMA Areas x Runoff Factor Curb Inlet Filter Insert C [A] [8] [C] [A] x [C] DMA 3 75,930 Concrete or Asphalt A 1.00 0.892 67,730 Design Storm Depth (in) DCV, VBMP (cubic feet) Proposed Volume on Plans (cubic feet) 1 75,930 1 67,730 0.95 1 5,3621 Table D.4 4 DCV Calculations for LID BMPs DMA Type/ID DMA (square feet) Post -Project Surface Type Effective Impervious Fraction, If DMA Runoff Factor DMA Areas x Runoff Factor Curb Inlet Filter Insert D [A] [B] [C] [A] x [C] DMA 4 260,500 Concrete or Asphalt 1.00 0.892 232,366 Design Storm Depth (in) DCV, VBMP (cubic feet) Proposed Volume on Plans (cubic feet) _ • - I 260,500 I I 232,366 0.95 I 18,3961 Table D.4.5 DCV Calculations for LID BMPs DMA Type/ID DMA (square feet) Post -Project Surface Type Effective Impervious Fraction, If DMA Runoff Factor DMA Areas x Runoff Factor Curb Inlet Filter Insert E [A] [B] [C] [A] x [C] DMA 5 320,860 Concrete or Asphalt 1.00 0.892 286,207 Design Storm Depth (in) DCV, VBMP (cubic feet) Proposed Volume on Plans (cubic feet) _ - I 320,860 I 286,207 0.95 I 22,658I N O O O I a. u_ FloGard° FILTER FRAME. MOUNTING BRACKET. v rDDI(►1/- •ei:*` 4 .9 ift; • /EXPANSION FILTER LINER & BOLT. SUPPORT BASKET. DETAIL A MOUNTING BRACKET & EXPANSION BOLTS SEE NOTE 2 SCALE: 6X FloGard° CURB INLET FILTER ASSEMBLY. NOTES: 1. Filter insert shall have a high flow bypass feature. 2. Filter support frame shall be constructed from stainless steel Type 304. 3. Filter medium shall be Fossil Rock TM, installed and maintained in accordance with manufacturer specifications. 4. Storage capacity reflects 80% of maximum solids collection prior to impeding filtering bypass. CATCH BASIN. A L_ RUBBER GASKETS. SECTION B -B FOSSIL ROCK r"' ABSORBENT POUCH. TOP VIEW SCALE: 1X CURB OPENING. w FloGard® CURB INLET FILTER ASSEMBLY. r - B 12.00" SEE DETAIL A Ani11111111PCURB 1111 OPENING r""j" CATCH BASIN. SECTION A -A SIDE VIEW SCALE: 1X B FILTER LINER & SUPPORT BASKET. OUTLET Inlet Filtration FloGard® Catch Basin Insert Filter Curb Inlet Style Oldcastle® Stormwater Solutions 7921 Southpark Plaza, Suite 2001 Littleton, CO 180120 I Ph: 800.579.88191 oldcastlestormwater.com THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF OLDCASTLE PRECAST, INC. IT I5 SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE PURPOSES ONLY AND SHALL. NOT BE USED IN ANY WAY INJURIOUS TO THE INTERESTS OF SAID COMPANY. COPYRIGHT ®2010 OLDCASTLE PRECAST, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. DRAWING NO. FGP-0002 REV E ECO ECO -0127 JPR 5/18/15 DATE JPR 1/3/06 SHEET 1 OF 1 SPECIFIER CHART MODEL NO. Curb Opening Width - W - Storage Capacity - Cu. Ft. - Filtered Flow Rate - GPM/CFS - Bypass Flow Rate - GPM/CFS - FGP-24C1 2.0' (24") .95 338 / .75 2,513 / 5.6 FGP-30CI 2.5' (30") 1.20 450 / 1.00 3,008 / 6.7 FGP-36CI 3.0' (36") 1.50 563 / 1.25 3,547 / 7.9 FGP-42CI 3.5' (42") 1.80 675 / 1.50 3,951 / 8.8 FGP-48CI 4.0' (48") 2.10 768 / 1.76 4,445 / 9.9 FGP-5.0CI 5.0' (60") 2.40 900 / 2.00 5,208 / 11.6 FGP-6.00I 6.0' (72") 3.05 1,126 / 2.51 6,196 / 13.8 FGP-7.0CI 7.0' (84") 3.65 1,350 / 3.01 7,139 / 15.9 FGP-8.00I 8.0' (96") 4.25 1,576 / 3.51 8,082 / 18.0 FGP-10.0CI 10.0' (120") 4.85 1,800 / 4.01 9,833 / 21.9 FGP-12.0CI 12.0' (144") 6.10 2,252 / 5.02 11,764 / 26.2 FGP-14.0CI 14.0' (168") 7.30 2,700 / 6.02 13,515 / 30.1 FGP-16.0CI 16.0' (192") 8.55 3.152 / 7.02 15,446 / 34.4 FGP-18.0CI 18.0' (216") 9.45 3,490 / 7.78 17,152 / 38.2 FGP-21.00I 21.0' (252") 10.95 4,050 / 9.02 19,891 / 44.3 FGP-28.0CI 28.0 (336") 14.60 5,400 / 12.03 26,311 / 58.6 NOTES: 1. Filter insert shall have a high flow bypass feature. 2. Filter support frame shall be constructed from stainless steel Type 304. 3. Filter medium shall be Fossil Rock TM, installed and maintained in accordance with manufacturer specifications. 4. Storage capacity reflects 80% of maximum solids collection prior to impeding filtering bypass. CATCH BASIN. A L_ RUBBER GASKETS. SECTION B -B FOSSIL ROCK r"' ABSORBENT POUCH. TOP VIEW SCALE: 1X CURB OPENING. w FloGard® CURB INLET FILTER ASSEMBLY. r - B 12.00" SEE DETAIL A Ani11111111PCURB 1111 OPENING r""j" CATCH BASIN. SECTION A -A SIDE VIEW SCALE: 1X B FILTER LINER & SUPPORT BASKET. OUTLET Inlet Filtration FloGard® Catch Basin Insert Filter Curb Inlet Style Oldcastle® Stormwater Solutions 7921 Southpark Plaza, Suite 2001 Littleton, CO 180120 I Ph: 800.579.88191 oldcastlestormwater.com THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF OLDCASTLE PRECAST, INC. IT I5 SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE PURPOSES ONLY AND SHALL. NOT BE USED IN ANY WAY INJURIOUS TO THE INTERESTS OF SAID COMPANY. COPYRIGHT ®2010 OLDCASTLE PRECAST, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. DRAWING NO. FGP-0002 REV E ECO ECO -0127 JPR 5/18/15 DATE JPR 1/3/06 SHEET 1 OF 1 Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Pechanga Parkway Widening Appendix 7: Hydromodification Supporting Detail Relating to compliance with the HMP Performance Standards N/A — Project Exempt from HCOC Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Pechanga Parkway Widening Appendix 8: Source Control Pollutant Sources/Source Control Checklist - 50 - STORMWATER POLLUTANT SOURCES/SOURCE CONTROL CHECKLIST How to use this worksheet (also see instructions in Section G of the WQMP Template): 1. Review Column 1 and identify which of these potential sources of stormwater pollutants apply to your site. Check each box that applies. 2. Review Column 2 and incorporate all of the corresponding applicable BMPs in your WQMP Exhibit. 3. Review Columns 3 and 4 and incorporate all of the corresponding applicable permanent controls and operational BMPs in your WQMP. Use the format shown in Table G.lon page 23 of this WQMP Template. Describe your specific BMPs in an accompanying narrative, and explain any special conditions or situations that required omitting BMPs or substituting alternative BMPs for those shown here. IF THESE SOURCES WILL BE ON THE PROJECT SITE ... ... THEN YOUR WQMP SHOULD INCLUDE THESE SOURCE CONTROL BMPs, AS APPLICABLE 1 Potential Sources of Runoff Pollutants 2 Permanent Controls—Show on WQMP DrawingsTable 3 Permanent Controls—List in WQMP and Narrative 4 Operational BMPs—Include in WQMP Table and Narrative X A. On-site storm drain inlets x Locations of inlets. - X Mark all inlets with the words "Only Rain Down the Storm Drain" or similar. Catch Basin Markers may be available from the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, call 951.955.1200 to verify. X Maintain and periodically repaint or replace inlet markings. ❑ Provide stormwater pollution prevention information to new site owners, lessees, or operators. ❑ See applicable operational BMPs in Fact Sheet SC -44, "Drainage System Maintenance," in the CASQA Stormwater Quality Handbooks at www.cabmphandbooks.com 0 Include the following in lease agreements: "Tenant shall not allow anyone to discharge anything to storm drains or to store or deposit materials so as to create a potential discharge to storm drains." 0 B. Interior floor drains and elevator shaft sump pumps ❑ State that interior floor drains and elevator shaft sump pumps will be plumbed to sanitary sewer. 0 Inspect and maintain drains to prevent blockages and overflow. ❑ C. Interior parking garages 0 State that parking garage floor drains will be plumbed to the sanitary sewer. ❑ Inspect and maintain drains to prevent blockages and overflow. STORMWATER POLLUTANT SOURCES/SOURCE CONTROL CHECKLIST IF THESE SOURCES WILL BE ON THE PROJECT SITE ... ... THEN YOUR WQMP SHOULD INCLUDE THESE SOURCE CONTROL BMPs, AS APPLICABLE 1 Potential Sources of Runoff Pollutants 2 Permanent Controls—Show on WQMP Drawings 3 Permanent Controls—List in WQMP Table and Narrative 4 Operational BMPs—Include in WQMP Table and Narrative ❑ D1. Need for future indoor & structural pest control ❑ Note building design features that discourage entry of pests. 0 Provide Integrated Pest Management information to owners, lessees, and operators. 0 D2. Landscape/ Outdoor Pesticide Use 0 Show locations of native trees or areas of shrubs and ground cover to be undisturbed and retained. 0 Show self-retaining landscape areas, if any. 0 Show stormwater treatment and hydrograph modification management BMPs. (See instructions in Chapter 3, Step 5 and guidance in Chapter 5.) State that final landscape plans will accomplish all of the following. 0 Preserve existing native trees, shrubs, and ground cover to the maximum extent possible. 0 Design landscaping to minimize irrigation and runoff, to promote surface infiltration where appropriate, and to minimize the use of fertilizers and pesticides that can contribute to stormwater ❑ pollution. Where landscaped areas are used to retain or detain stormwater, specify plants that are tolerant of saturated 0 soil conditions. Consider using pest -resistant o plants, especially adjacent to hardscape. To insure successful establishment, select plants appropriate to site soils, slopes, climate, sun, wind, rain, land use, air movement, ecological consistency, and plant interactions. ❑ Maintain landscaping using minimum or no pesticides. 0 See applicable operational BMPs in "What you should know for.....Landscape and Gardening" at http://rcflood.org/stormwater/Error! Hyperlink reference not valid. Provide IPM information to new 0 owners, lessees and operators. STORMWATER POLLUTANT SOURCES/SOURCE CONTROL CHECKLIST IF THESE SOURCES WILL BE ON THE PROJECT SITE ... ••• THEN YOUR WQMP SHOULD INCLUDE THESE SOURCE CONTROL BMPs, AS APPLICABLE 1 Potential Sources of Runoff Pollutants 2 Permanent Controls—Show on WQMP Drawings 3 Permanent Controls—List in WQMP Table and Narrative 4 Operational BMPs—Include in WQMP Table and Narrative ❑ E. Pools, spas, ponds, decorative fountains, and other water features. 0 Show location of water feature and a sanitary sewer cleanout in an accessible area within 10 feet. (Exception: Public pools must be plumbed according to County Department of Environmental Health Guidelines.) If the Co -Permittee requires pools to be plumbed to the sanitary sewer, place a note on the plans and state in the narrative that this connection will be made according to local requirements. 0 See applicable operational BMPs in "Guidelines for Maintaining Your Swimming Pool, Jacuzzi and Garden Fountain" at http://rcflood.org/stormwater/ 0 F. Food service 0 For restaurants, grocery stores, and other food service operations, show location (indoors or in a covered area outdoors) of a floor sink or other area for cleaning floor mats, containers, and equipment. 0 On the drawing, show a note that this drain will be connected to a grease interceptor before discharging to the sanitary sewer. 0 Describe the location and features of the designated cleaning area. 0 Describe the items to be cleaned in this facility and how it has been sized to insure that the largest items can be accommodated. 0 See the brochure, "The Food Service Industry Best Management Practices for: Restaurants, Grocery Stores, Delicatessens and Bakeries" at http://rcflood.org/stormwater/ Provide this brochure to new site owners, lessees, and operators. O G. Refuse areas 0 Show where site refuse and recycled materials will be handled and stored for pickup. See local municipal requirements for sizes and other details of refuse areas. 0 If dumpsters or other receptacles are outdoors, show how the designated area will be covered, graded, and paved to prevent run- on and show locations of berms to prevent runoff from the area. ❑ Any drains from dumpsters, compactors, and tallow bin areas shall be connected to a grease removal device before discharge to sanitary sewer. 0 State how site refuse will be handled and provide supporting detail to what is shown on plans. 0 State that signs will be posted on or near dumpsters with the words "Do not dump hazardous materials here" or similar. 0 State how the following will be implemented: Provide adequate number of receptacles. Inspect receptacles regularly; repair or replace leaky receptacles. Keep receptacles covered. Prohibit/prevent dumping of liquid or hazardous wastes. Post "no hazardous materials" signs. Inspect and pick up litter daily and clean up spills immediately. Keep spill control materials available on-site. See Fact Sheet SC-34,Waste Handling and Disposal" in the CASQA Stormwater Quality Handbooks at www.cabmphandbooks.com STORMWATER POLLUTANT SOURCES/SOURCE CONTROL CHECKLIST IF THESE SOURCES WILL BE ON THE PROJECT SITE ... ,,, THEN YOUR WQMP SHOULD INCLUDE THESE SOURCE CONTROL BMPs, AS APPLICABLE 1 2 3 4 Potential Sources of Permanent Controls—Show on Permanent Controls—List in WQMP Operational BMPs—Include in WQMP Runoff Pollutants WQMP Drawings Table and Narrative Table and Narrative 0 H. Industrial processes. 0 Show process area. 0 If industrial processes are to be located on site, state: "All process activities to be performed indoors. 0 See Fact Sheet SC -10, "Non - Stormwater Discharges" in the CASQA Stormwater Quality No processes to drain to exterior or to storm drain system." Handbooks at www.cabmphandbooks.com See the brochure "Industrial & Commercial Facilities Best Management Practices for: Industrial, Commercial Facilities" at http://rcflood.org/stormwater/ STORMWATER POLLUTANT SOURCES/SOURCE CONTROL CHECKLIST IF THESE SOURCES WILL BE ON THE PROJECT SITE ... ••• THEN YOUR WQMP SHOULD INCLUDE THESE SOURCE CONTROL BMPs, AS APPLICABLE 1 2 3 4 Potential Sources of Permanent Controls—Show on Permanent Controls—List in WQMP Operational BMPs—Include in WQMP Runoff Pollutants WQMP Drawings Table and Narrative Table and Narrative 0 I. Outdoor storage of equipment or materials. (See rows J and K for 0 Show any outdoor storage areas, including how materials will be covered. Show how areas will be Include a detailed description of materials to be stored, storage areas, and structural features to ❑ See the Fact Sheets SC -31, "Outdoor Liquid Container Storage" and SC -33, "Outdoor Storage of Raw Materials " source control graded and bermed to prevent run- prevent pollutants from entering in the CASQA Stormwater Quality measures for vehicle on or run-off from area. storm drains. Handbooks at cleaning, repair, and �vww•cabmphandbooks.com maintenance.) Storage of non -hazardous liquids shall be covered by a roof and/or drain to the sanitary sewer system, and be contained by berms, dikes, Where appropriate, reference documentation of compliance with the requirements of Hazardous Materials Programs for: liners, or vaults. ■ Hazardous Waste Generation 0 Storage of hazardous materials and wastes must be in compliance with the local hazardous materials ordinance and a Hazardous • Hazardous Materials Release Response and Inventory • California Accidental Release Materials Management Plan for the site. (CaIARP) • Aboveground Storage Tank • Uniform Fire Code Article 80 Section 103(b) & (c) 1991 • Underground Storage Tank www.cchealth.org/groups/hazmat 1 STORMWATER POLLUTANT SOURCES/SOURCE CONTROL CHECKLIST IF THESE SOURCES WILL BE ON THE PROJECT SITE ... ... THEN YOUR WQMP SHOULD INCLUDE THESE SOURCE CONTROL BMPs, AS APPLICABLE 1 2 3 4 Potential Sources of Permanent Controls—Show on Permanent Controls—List in WQMP Operational BMPs—Include in WQMP Runoff Pollutants WQMP Drawings Table and Narrative Table and Narrative 0 J. Vehicle and Equipment Cleaning 0 Show on drawings as appropriate: (1) Commercial/industrial facilities 0 If a car wash area is not provided, describe any measures taken to Describe operational measures to implement the following (if having vehicle/equipment cleaning discourage on-site car washing and applicable): needs shall either provide a covered, bermed area for washing activities or discourage vehicle/equipment washing by removing hose bibs and installing signs prohibiting such uses. explain how these will be enforced. 0 Washwater from vehicle and equipment washing operations shall not be discharged to the storm drain system. Refer to "Outdoor Cleaning Activities and Professional Mobile Service Providers" for many of the Potential (2) Multi -dwelling complexes shall have a paved, bermed, and covered car wash area (unless car washing is prohibited on-site and hoses are provided with an automatic shut- off to discourage such use). Sources of Runoff Pollutants categories below. Brochure can be found at http://rcflood.org/stormwater/ OCar dealerships and similar may rinse cars with water only. (3) Washing areas for cars, vehicles, and equipment shall be paved, designed to prevent run-on to or runoff from the area, and plumbed to drain to the sanitary sewer. (4) Commercial car wash facilities shall be designed such that no runoff from the facility is discharged to the storm drain system. Wastewater from the facility shall discharge to the sanitary sewer, or a wastewater reclamation system shall be installed. STORMWATER POLLUTANT SOURCES/SOURCE CONTROL CHECKLIST IF THESE SOURCES WILL BE ON THE PROJECT SITE ... ,,, THEN YOUR WQMP SHOULD INCLUDE THESE SOURCE CONTROL BMPs, AS APPLICABLE 1 2 3 4 Potential Sources of Permanent Controls—Show on Permanent Controls—List in WQMP Operational BMPs—Include in WQMP Runoff Pollutants WQMP Drawings Table and Narrative Table and Narrative 0 K. Vehicle/Equipment 0 Accommodate all vehicle 0 State that no vehicle repair or In the Stormwater Control Plan, note Repair and equipment repair and maintenance maintenance will be done outdoors, that all of the following restrictions Maintenance indoors. Or designate an outdoor or else describe the required apply to use the site: work area and design the area to prevent run-on and runoff of features of the outdoor work area. 0 State that there are no floor drains 0 No person shall dispose of, nor permit the disposal, directly or indirectly of stormwater. or if there are floor drains, note the vehicle fluids, hazardous materials, or 0 Show secondary containment for agency from which an industrial rinsewater from parts cleaning into exterior work areas where motor oil, brake fluid, gasoline, diesel waste discharge permit will be obtained and that the design meets storm drains. 0 No vehicle fluid removal shall be fuel, radiator fluid, acid -containing batteries or other hazardous that agency's requirements. 0 State that there are no tanks, performed outside a building, nor on asphalt or ground surfaces, whether materials or hazardous wastes are containers or sinks to be used for inside or outside a building, except in used or stored. Drains shall not be parts cleaning or rinsing or, if there such a manner as to ensure that any installed within the secondary are, note the agency from which an spilled fluid will be in an area of containment areas. industrial waste discharge permit secondary containment. Leaking 0 Add a note on the plans that states will be obtained and that the vehicle fluids shall be contained or either (1) there are no floor drains, or (2) floor drains are connected to wastewater pretreatment systems prior to discharge to the sanitary sewer and an industrial waste discharge permit will be obtained. design meets that agency's requirements. drained from the vehicle immediately. No person shall leave unattended drip 0 parts or other open containers containing vehicle fluid, unless such containers are in use or in an area of secondary containment. Refer to "Automotive Maintenance & Car Care Best Management Practices for Auto Body Shops, Auto Repair Shops, Car Dealerships, Gas Stations and Fleet Service Operations". Brochure can be found at http://rcflood.org/stormwater/ Refer to Outdoor Cleaning Activities and Professional Mobile Service Providers for many of the Potential Sources of Runoff Pollutants categories below. Brochure can be found at http: //rcflood.org/stormwater/ STORMWATER POLLUTANT SOURCES/SOURCE CONTROL CHECKLIST IF THESE SOURCES WILL BE ON THE PROJECT SITE ... ... THEN YOUR WQMP SHOULD INCLUDE THESE SOURCE CONTROL BMPs, AS APPLICABLE 1 2 3 4 Potential Sources of Permanent Controls—Show on Permanent Controls—List in WQMP Operational BMPs—Include in WQMP Runoff Pollutants WQMP Drawings Table and Narrative Table and Narrative 0 L. Fuel Dispensing 0 Fueling areas" shall have 0 The property owner shall dry sweep Areas impermeable floors (i.e., portland cement concrete or equivalent smooth impervious surface) that are: a) graded at the minimum slope necessary to prevent ponding; and b) separated from the rest of the site by a grade break that prevents run-on of stormwater to the maximum extent practicable. the fueling area routinely. 0 See the Fact Sheet SD -30 , "Fueling Areas" in the CASQA Stormwater Quality Handbooks at www.cabmphandbooks.com 0 Fueling areas shall be covered by a canopy that extends a minimum of ten feet in each direction from each pump. [Alternative: The fueling area must be covered and the cover's minimum dimensions must be equal to or greater than the area within the grade break or fuel dispensing areal.] The canopy [or cover] shall not drain onto the fueling area. G The fueling area shall be defined as the area extending a minimum of 6.5 feet from the corner of each fuel dispenser or the length at which the hose and nozzle assembly may be operated plus a minimum of one foot, whichever is greater. STORMWATER POLLUTANT SOURCES/SOURCE CONTROL CHECKLIST IF THESE SOURCES WILL BE ON THE PROJECT SITE ... ... THEN YOUR WQMP SHOULD INCLUDE THESE SOURCE CONTROL BMPs, AS APPLICABLE 1 2 3 4 Potential Sources of Permanent Controls—Show on Permanent Controls—List in WQMP Operational BMPs—Include in WQMP Runoff Pollutants WQMP Drawings Table and Narrative Table and Narrative ❑ M. Loading Docks 0 Show a preliminary design for the loading dock area, including roofing and drainage. Loading docks shall be covered and/or graded to minimize run-on to and runoff from the loading area. Roof downspouts shall be positioned to direct stormwater away from the loading area. Water from loading dock areas shall be drained to the sanitary sewer, or diverted and collected for ultimate discharge to the sanitary sewer. 0 Move loaded and unloaded items indoors as soon as possible. 0 See Fact Sheet SC -30, "Outdoor Loading and Unloading," in the CASQA Stormwater Quality Handbooks at www.cabmphandbooks.com ❑ Loading dock areas draining directly to the sanitary sewer shall be equipped with a spill control valve or equivalent device, which shall be kept closed during periods of operation. ❑ Provide a roof overhang over the loading area or install door skirts (cowling) at each bay that enclose the end of the trailer. STORMWATER POLLUTANT SOURCES/SOURCE CONTROL CHECKLIST IF THESE SOURCES WILL BE ON THE PROJECT SITE ... ... THEN YOUR WQMP SHOULD INCLUDE THESE SOURCE CONTROL BMPs, AS APPLICABLE 1 Potential Sources of Runoff Pollutants 2 Permanent Controls—Show on WQMP Drawings 3 Permanent Controls—List in WQMP Table and Narrative 4 Operational BMPs—Include in WQMP Table and Narrative 0 N. Fire Sprinkler Test Water 0 Provide a means to drain fire sprinkler test water to the sanitary sewer. 0 See the note in Fact Sheet SC -41, "Building and Grounds Maintenance," in the CASQA Stormwater Quality Handbooks at ww w.cabmphandbooks.com 0. Miscellaneous Drain or Wash Water or Other Sources ❑ Boiler drain lines ❑ Condensate drain lines O Rooftop equipment O Drainage sumps O Roofing, gutters, and trim. ❑ Other sources 0 Boiler drain lines shall be directly or indirectly connected to the sanitary sewer system and may not discharge to the storm drain 0 system. Condensate drain lines may discharge to landscaped areas if the flow is small enough that runoff will not occur. Condensate drain ❑ lines may not discharge to the storm drain system. Rooftop equipment with potential to produce pollutants shall be u roofed and/or have secondary containment. Any drainage sumps on-site shall ❑ feature a sediment sump to reduce the quantity of sediment in pumped water. ❑ Avoid roofing, gutters, and trim made of copper or other unprotected metals that may leach into runoff. Include controls for other sources as specified by local reviewer. STORMWATER POLLUTANT SOURCES/SOURCE CONTROL CHECKLIST IF THESE SOURCES WILL BE ON THE PROJECT SITE ... ... THEN YOUR WQMP SHOULD INCLUDE THESE SOURCE CONTROL BMPs, AS APPLICABLE 1 2 3 4 Potential Sources of Permanent Controls—Show on Permanent Controls—List in WQMP Operational BMPs—Include in WQMP Runoff Pollutants WQMP Drawings Table and Narrative Table and Narrative X P. Plazas, sidewalks, and parking Lots. 'X Sweep plazas, sidewalks, and parking lots regularly to prevent accumulation of litter and debris. Collect debris from pressure washing to prevent entry into the storm drain system. Collect washwater containing any cleaning agent or degreaser and discharge to the sanitary sewer not to a storm drain. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Pechanga Parkway Widening Appendix 9: O&M Operation and Maintenance Plan and Documentation of Finance, Maintenance and Recording Mechanisms - 51 - GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS FOR MAINTENANCE OF FLO-GARD+PLUS® CATCH BASIN INSERT FILTERS SCOPE: fc°11„)44\sDPS Federal, State and Local Clean Water Act regulations and those of insurance carriers require that stormwater filtration systems be maintained and serviced on a recurring basis. The intent of the regulations is to ensure that the systems, on a continuing basis, efficiently remove pollutants from stormwater runoff thereby preventing pollution of the nation's water resources. These specifications apply to the FloGard+Plus® Catch Basin Insert Filter. RECOMMENDED FREQUENCY OF SERVICE: Drainage Protection Systems (DPS) recommends that installed Flo-Gard+Plus® Catch Basin Insert Filters be serviced on a recurring basis. Ultimately, the frequency depends on the amount of runoff, pollutant loading and interference from debris (leaves, vegetation, cans, paper, etc.); however, it is recommended that each installation be serviced a minimum of three times per year, with a change of filter medium once per year. DPS technicians are available to do an on-site evaluation, upon request. RECOMMENDED TIMING OF SERVICE: DPS guidelines for the timing of service are as follows: 1. For areas with a definite rainy season: Prior to, during and following the rainy season. 2. For areas subject to year-round rainfall: On a recurring basis (at least three times per year). 3. For areas with winter snow and summer rain: Prior to and just after the snow season and during the summer rain season. 4. For installed devices not subject to the elements (washracks, parking garages, etc.): On a recurring basis (no less than three times per years). SERVICE PROCEDURES: 1. The catch basin grate shall be removed and set to one side. The catch basin shall be visually inspected for defects and possible illegal dumping. If illegal dumping has occurred, the proper authorities and property owner representative shall be notified as soon as practicable. 2. Using an industrial vacuum, the collected materials shall be removed from the liner. (Note: DPS uses a truck -mounted vacuum for servicing Flo-Gard+Plus® catch basin inserts.) 3. When all of the collected materials have been removed, the filter medium pouches shall be removed by unsnapping the tether from the D -ring and set to one side. The filter liner, gaskets, stainless steel frame and mounting brackets, etc. shall be inspected for continued serviceability. Minor damage or defects found shall be corrected on -the -spot and a notation made on the Maintenance Record. More extensive deficiencies that affect the efficiency of the filter (torn liner, etc.), if approved by the customer representative, will be corrected and an invoice submitted to the representative along with the Maintenance Record. 4. The filter medium pouches shall be inspected for defects and continued serviceability and replaced as necessary and the pouch tethers re -attached to the liner's D -ring. See below. 5. The grate shall be replaced. REPLACEMENT AND DISPOSAL OF EXPOSED FILTER MEDIUM AND COLLECTED DEBRIS The frequency of filter medium pouch exchange will be in accordance with the existing DPS -Customer Maintenance Contract. DPS recommends that the medium be changed at least once per year. During the appropriate service, or if so determined by the service technician during a non-scheduled service, the filter medium pouches will be replaced with new pouches. Once the exposed pouches and debris have been removed, DPS has possession and must dispose of it in accordance with local, state and federal agency requirements. DPS also has the capability of servicing all manner of catch basin inserts and catch basins without inserts, underground oil/water separators, stormwater interceptors and other such devices. All DPS personnel are highly qualified technicians and are confined space trained and certified. Call us at (888) 950-8826 for further information and assistance. FLOGARD +PLUS° CATCH BASIN INSERT FILTER Inlet Filtration 1 Removes pollutants from runoff at the source FloGard +Plus is a catch basin insert filter designed to remove sediment, gross solids, trash, and petroleum hydrocarbons from stormwater runoff FloGard +Plus is ideally suited for removal of primary pollutants from paved surfaces in commercial and residential areas. Rated filter flow capacities are designed to exceed the required "first flush" treatment flow rate, and the unique dual -bypass design typically exceeds catch basin inlet capacity. Economical Treatment Quick, easy, and cost-effective to install, inspect, and maintain. Efficient Performance Removes pollutants at the inlet where they are easiest to catch. Versatile Applications Appropriate and easy to use on new construction or retrofit projects. Flexible Design Available in a wide variety of sizes and configurations, including custom options. Durable Construction Built to last and withstand the loads from captured pollutants. Environmentally Friendly No standing water minimizes vector, bacteria, and odor problems. Proven Performance Field and laboratory tested with up to 86%' removal ofTSS and 80%2 removal of oils and grease. 7. University of Auckland laboratory testing of local street sweep material. 2. UCLA laboratory study. Grote FloGard +Plus Catch Basin Insert Filter High flow dual -bypass feature Stainless steel frame Catch Basin Fossil Rock" absorbent pouches hong inside filter basket Filter liner & support basket Outlet How It Works: Flows entering the unit pass through the filter liner basket for removal of sediment, trash, and debris. Optional Fossil Rock" sorbent pouches installed in the basket effect hydrocarbon capture. As the storm flow exceeds the treatment flow rate, treatment will continue and excess flows will pass through the dual -bypass openings near the top of the unit. Oldcastle Stormwater Solutions FloGard +Plus Catch Basin Insert Filter Catch basin insert designed to capture sediment, gross solids, trash, and petroleum hydrocarbons from low (first flush) flows, even during the most extreme weather conditions. Example Types, Sizes, and Capacities Additional sizes, including regional and custom options are available. FloGard Combination Inlet SPECIFIER CHART NO. MODELIDeta STANDARD DEPTH STANDARD 8 SHALLOW DEPTH m mese colones Is me same for both STANDARD & SHALLOW versions) STANDARD DEPTH -20 Inches- MODEL NO. SHALLOW DEPTH SHALLOW DEPTH -12 Inches- INLET ID Inside Dimension (Inch x Inch) GRATE OD Outside Dimension (inch x inch) TOTAL BYPASS CAPACITY (cu. 0. / sec.) SOLIDS STORAGE CAPACITY (Cu. ft.) FILTERED FLOW (cu. ft. / sec.) SOLIDS STORAGE CAPACITY (cu. ft.) FILTERED FLOW (cu. tt. / sec.) FGP-1633FGO 16 X 33 18 X 36 7.0 2.5 1.7 FGP-1633FG08 1.4 1.1 FGP-1836FGO 18 X 36 18 X 40 6.9 2.3 1.6 FGP-1836FG08 1.3 .9 FGP-2234FGO 22 X 34 24 X 36 8.1 3.6 2.1 FGP-2234FG08 2.1 1.4 FGP-2438FGO 24 X 36 24 X 40 8.0 3.4 2.0 FGP-2436FG08 1.95 1.15 FloGard Flat Grated Inlet SPECIFIER CHART MODEL MODEL NO. STANDARD DEPTH STANDARD 8 SHALLOW DEPTH In mese wwmes N f e sane for both STANDARD 8 SHALLOW versions) STANDARD DEPTH -20 Inches - MODEL NO. SHALLOW DEPTH SHALLOW DEPTH INLET ID Inside Dimension (inch x Inth) GRATE OD Outside Dimension (Inch x Inch) TOTAL BYPASS CAPACITY (cu. ft. / sec.) SOLIDS STORAGE CAPACITY (cu. ft.) FILTERED FLOW (cu. ft. / sec.) SOLIDS STORAGE CAPACITY (cu. ft.) FILTERED FLOW (cu. ft. / sec.) FGP-12F 12 X 12 12 X 14 2.8 0.3 0.4 FGP-12F8 .15 .25 FGP-16F 16 X 16 16 X 19 4.7 0.8 0.7 FGP-16F8 .45 .4 FGP-18F 18 X 18 18 X 20 4.7 0.8 0.7 FGP-18F8 .45 .4 FGP-1836F 18X36 18 X40 6.9 2.3 1.6 FGP-1836F8 1.3 .9 FGP-21F 22 X 22 22 X 24 6.1 2.2 1.5 FGP-21F8 1.25 .85 FGP-24F 24 X 24 24 X 27 6.1 2.2 1.5 FGP-24F8 1.25 .85 FGP-2436F 24 X 36 24 X 40 8.0 3.4 2.0 FGP-2436F8 1.95 1.15 FGP-2448F 24 X 48 24 X 48 9.3 4.4 2.4 FGP-2448F8 2.5 1.35 FGP-32F-TN 28 X 28 32 X 32 6.3 2.2 1.5 FGP-32F8-TN 1.25 .85 FGP-30F 30 X 30 30X34 8.1 3.6 2.0 FGP-30F8 2.05 1.15 FGP-36F 36 X 36 36 X 40 9.1 4.6 2.4 FGP-36F8 2.65 1.35 FGP-3648F 36 X 48 40 X 48 11.5 6.8 3.2 FGP-3648E8 3.9 1.85 FGP-48F 48 X48 48X54 13.2 9.5 3.9 FGP-48F8 5.45 2.25 FGP-1633F 16X34 18X36 6.9 2.3 1.6 FGP-1633F8 1.3 .9 FGP-2234F 22 X 34 24 X 36 8.0 3.4 2.0 FGP-2234F8 1.95 1.15 FloGard Circular Grated Inlet SPECIFIER CHART MODEL NUMBER INLET ID (0 INCHES) GRATE OD (0 INCHES) SOLIDS STORAGE CAPACITY (CU FT) FILTERED FLOW (CFS) TOTAL BYPASS CAPACITY (CFS) FGP-RF15F 15 18 0.3 0.4 2.8 FGP-RF18F 18 20 0.8 0.7 4.7 FGP-RF2OF 20 23 0.8 0.7 4.7 FGP-RF21F 21 23.5 0.8 0.7 4.7 FGP-RF22F 22 24 0.8 0.7 4.7 FGP-RF24F 24 26 0.8 0.7 4.7 FGP-RF3OF 30 32 2.2 1.5 6.1 FGP-RF36F 36 39 3.6 2.0 8.1 Visit our website: oldcastlestormwater.com or call (800) 579-8819 for additional sizes and options. Combination Inlet Flat Grated Inlet Circular Frame Catch Basin I� • �Oldcastle? Stormwater Solutions (800) 579-8819 oldcastlestormwater.com 12/22/2015_V3 stormcapture.com ©2015 Oldcastle Precast, Inc. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Pechanga Parkway Widening Appendix 10: Educational Materials BMP Fact Sheets, Maintenance Guidelines and Other End -User BMP Information N/A City of Temecula Pechanga Parkway Widening Appendix F: Noise Data December 2016 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Site Number: 1 Recorded By: Alesia Hsiao Job Number: 153547 Date: 5/11/2016 Time: 11:42 a.m. Location: Along Eona Circle Source of Peak Noise: Traffic along Eona Circle and Pechanga Parkway, birds chirping, residential noise (garage doors, car doors, etc.) Noise Data Leq (dB) Lmin (dB) Lmax (dB) Peak (dB) 50.9 34.5 65.6 87.5 Equipment Category Type Vendor Model Serial No. Cert. Date Note Sound Sound Level Meter Briiel & Kja r 2250 2548189 1/4/2016 Microphone Briiel & Kja r 4189 2543364 1/4/2016 Preamp Briiel & Kja r ZC 0032 4265 1/4/2016 Calibrator Briiel & Kja r 4231 2545667 1/4/2016 Weather Data Est. Duration: 10 minutes Sky: 0 Sunny Note: dBA Offset = 0.01 Sensor Height (ft): 5 ft Wind Ave Speed (mph / m/s) Temperature (degrees Fahrenheit) Barometer Pressure (hPa) 1.0 82.6 29.98 Photo of Measurement Location 2250 Instrument: Time 2250 Application: FSI BZ7225 Version 4.4 Start Time: LAFmin [dB] 05/11/2016 11:42:15 End Time: FS 05/11/2016 11:52:15 Elapsed Time: 50.9 00:10:00 Bandwidth: Time 1 /3 -octave Max Input Level: 0:10:00 138.72 Instrument Serial Number: Time Frequency Broadband (excl. Peak): FSI AZ Broadband Peak: LAFmin [dB] C Spectrum: FS Z Instrument Serial Number: Start time 2548189 Microphone Serial Number: Overload [%1 2543364 Input: LAFmin [dB] Top Socket Windscreen Correction: None Sound Field Correction: 50.9 Free -field Calibration Time: Start time 05/09/2016 17:06:48 Calibration Type: Overload [%1 External reference Sensitivity: LAFmin [dB] 64.5731016993523 mV/Pa PEC001 Start time End time Elapsed time Overload [%1 LAeq [dB] LAFmax [dB] LAFmin [dB] Value 0.00 50.9 65.6 34.5 Time 11:42:15 AM 11:52:15 AM 0:10:00 Date 05/11/2016 05/11/2016 JOT PEC001 dB 05/11/2016 11:42:15 AM - 11:52:15 AM 140 ; 130-1 120—+ 110- 100 - 90—; 80-1 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 i i + i r L + I 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 12.50 31.50 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 16000 A Z Hz _ LZeq _ LZFmax _ LZFmin Cursor: (A) Leq=50.9 dB LFmax=65.6 dB LFmin=34.5 dB PEC001 Based on LAF , 10ms Class width: 0.2 dB 05/11/2016 11:42:15 AM - 11:52:15 AM 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 10 20 Level 30 40 50 60 Cumulative Cursor: [74.8 ; 75.0[ dB Level: 0.0% Cumulative: 0.0% 70 80 90 100 110 120 L1 = 59.0 dB L5 = 55.6 dB L10 = 53.9 dB L50 = 48.5 dB L90 = 43.1 dB L95 = 40.8 dB L99 = 36.4 dB 130 140 dB PEC001 • Sound Start time Elapsed time dB 140 120— 100— 80 — 60 =____ ___ ____ - -, S= LJ . , z -L- 54.9 -LI-�zr 1 r i r 11:47:10 AM 0:00:10 L r 1 ___P L r _ r Date 05/11/2016 v`l_ 40 20 — s '� r r 1 I I I I 11:44:00 AM 11:46:00 AM 11:48:00 AM 11:50:00 AM 11:52:00 AM LAleq LAFmax LCpeak LAFmin Cursor: 05/11/2016 11:47:10 AM - 11:47:20 AM LAIeq=50.9 dB LAFmax=54.9 dB LCpeak=76.5 dB LAFmin=43.3 dB PEC001 Start time Elapsed time LAIeq [dB] LAFmax [dB] LAFmin [dB] Value 50.9 54.9 43.3 Time 11:47:10 AM 0:00:10 Date 05/11/2016 PEC001 dB 05/11/2016 11:47:10 AM - 11:47:20 AM 140 120 100 — 80 — 60 40 20 0 L 12.50 31.50 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 16000 A Z Hz _ LZeq Cursor: (A) Leq=48.6 dB IN Sound dB PEC001 Periodic reports 140 120— 100 — 80— 60 aoT 20 — Cursor: J , 1 -t L r J IJ J 1 L =� I i I 1 I N I , LAleq 1 11:44:00 AM 11:46:00 LAFmax 1 LAIeq=50.9 AM LCpeak 1 11:48:00 AM 11:50:00 AM dB LAFmin=38.5 dB t 11:52:00 AM 05/11/2016 11:47:00 AM - 11:48:00 AM dB LAFmax=58.7 LAFmin dB LCpeak=87.5 PEC001 Periodic reports PEC001 Periodic reports dB 05/11/2016 11:47:00 AM - 11:48:00 AM 140 120 — 100 12.50 31.50 63 125 250 500 E. LZeq _ LZFmax _ LZFmin Cursor: (A) Leq=47.5 dB LFmax=58.7 dB LFmin=38.5 dB 1000 2000 4000 8000 16000 A Z Hz Start time Elapsed time Overload [%] LAleq [dB] LAFinax [dB] LAFmin [dB] Value 0.00 50.9 58.7 38.5 Time 11:47:00 AM 0:01:00 Date 05/11/2016 PEC001 Periodic reports dB 05/11/2016 11:47:00 AM - 11:48:00 AM 140 120 — 100 12.50 31.50 63 125 250 500 E. LZeq _ LZFmax _ LZFmin Cursor: (A) Leq=47.5 dB LFmax=58.7 dB LFmin=38.5 dB 1000 2000 4000 8000 16000 A Z Hz PEC001 Periodic reports % Based on LAF , 1 Oms Class width: 0.2 dB 05/11/2016 11:47:00 AM - 11:48:00 AM 100 90 — 80— r Y y 70 — I 60— L 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 50 — Y 40 — 30 — 20 — 10- L - J L r - L 0 10 20 1 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 dB L1 = 52.2 dB L5 = 50.1 dB L10 = 49.6 dB L50 = 47.3 dB L90 = 42.6 dB L95 = 40.7 dB L99 = 39.0 dB Level Cumulative Cursor: [74.8 ; 75.0[ dB Level: 0.0% Cumulative: 0.0% Site Number: 2 Recorded By: Alesia Hsiao Job Number: 153547 Date: 5/11/2016 Time: 12:02 p.m. Location: Along Parsippany Center Source of Peak Noise: Traffic along Parsippany Center, birds chirping, residential noise (garage doors, car doors, etc.) Noise Data Leq (dB) Lmin (dB) Lmax (dB) Peak (dB) 62.1 38.0 93.3 89.2 Equipment Category Type Vendor Model Serial No. Cert. Date Note Sound Sound Level Meter Briiel & Kja r 2250 2548189 1/4/2016 Microphone Briiel & Kja r 4189 2543364 1/4/2016 Preamp Briiel & Kja r ZC 0032 4265 1/4/2016 Calibrator Briiel & Kjmr 4231 2545667 1/4/2016 Weather Data Est. Duration: 10 minutes Sky: £ Sunny Note: dBA Offset = 0.01 Sensor Height (ft): 5 ft Wind Ave Speed (mph I m/s) Temperature (degrees Fahrenheit) Barometer Pressure (hPa) 0.8 84.4 29.98 Photo of Measurement Location 2250 Instrument: Time 2250 Application: FSI BZ7225 Version 4.4 Start Time: LAFmin [d B] 05/11/2016 12:02:39 End Time: FS 05/11/2016 12:12:39 Elapsed Time: 62.1 00:10:00 Bandwidth: Time 1 /3 -octave Max Input Level: 0:10:00 138.72 Instrument Serial Number: Time Frequency Broadband (excl. Peak): FSI AZ Broadband Peak: LAFmin [d B] C Spectrum: FS Z Instrument Serial Number: Start time 2548189 Microphone Serial Number: Overload [%] 2543364 Input: LAFmin [d B] Top Socket Windscreen Correction: None Sound Field Correction: 62.1 Free -field Calibration Time: Start time 05/09/2016 17:06:48 Calibration Type: Overload [%] External reference Sensitivity: LAFmin [d B] 64.5731016993523 mV/Pa PEC002 Start time End time Elapsed time Overload [%] LAeq [d B] LAFmax [d B] LAFmin [d B] Value 0.00 62.1 93.3 38.0 Time 12:02:39 PM 12:12:39 PM 0:10:00 Date 05/11/2016 05/11/2016 PEC002 dB 05/11/2016 12:02:39 PM - 12:12:39 PM 140 130 120 — 4- L i 12.50 31.50 63 125 250 500 _ LZeq _ LZFmax _ LZFmin Cursor: (A) Leq=62.1 dB LFmax=93.3 dB LFmin=38.0 dB 1000 2000 4000 8000 16000 A Z Hz PEC002 Based on LAF , 10ms Class width: 0.2 dB 05/11/2016 12:02:39 PM - 12:12:39 PM 100 90 80 70 — 60 50 — 40 — 30 — 20 — 10- 0 L r J L J L r r r J L J L 10 20 30 40 50 60 Level Cumulative Cursor: [74.8 ; 75.0[ dB Level: 0.0% Cumulative: 0.6% L1 = 70.0 dB L5 = 54.3 dB L10 = 51.5 dB L50 = 44.5 dB L90 = 41.2 dB L95 = 40.5 dB L99 = 38.8 dB 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 dB PEC002 • Sound dB Elapsed time LAIeq [dB] LAFmax [dB] 140 120— 100 — 80 — 60 —MEr Value L 1 55.6 L r 1 I _ 12:07:30 PM L r --1_ z L r --1---‘- — r- • 40— 20 — L - L r ill r r I 12:04:00 PM 12:06:00 PM 12:08:00 PM 12:10:00 PM 12:12:00 PM LAleq LAFmax LCpeak LAFmin Cursor: 05/11/2016 12:07:30 PM - 12:07:40 PM LAleq=54.3 dB LAFmax=55.6 dB LCpeak=84.6 dB LAFmin=41.3 dB PEC002 Start time Elapsed time LAIeq [dB] LAFmax [dB] LAFmin [dB] Value 54.3 55.6 41.3 Time 12:07:30 PM 0:00:10 Date 05/11/2016 PEC002 dB 05/11/2016 12:07:30 PM - 12:07:40 PM 140 120 — 100—� 80 — 60 40 20 0 12.50 31.50 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 16000 A Z Hz _ LZeq Cursor: (A) Leq=45.3 dB • Sound dB PEC002 Periodic reports 140 120— 100- 80— 60 — 40 — 20— Cursor: L r 1 J 7 i L - i 4----�- r --� , I t 12:04:00 PM 12:06:00 PM LAleq LAFmax LCpeak I 12:08:00 PM LAFmin I I 12:10:00 PM 12:12:00 PM dB LAFmin=39.1 dB 05/11/2016 12:07:00 PM - 12:08:00 PM LAleq=56.4 dB LAFmax=65.3 dB LCpeak=89.2 PEC002 Periodic reports dB 05/11/2016 12:07:00 PM - 12:08:00 PM 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 PEC002 Periodic reports 12.50 31.50 63 125 250 500 _ LZeq _ LZFmax - LZFmin Cursor: (A) Leq=47.5 dB LFmax=65.3 dB LFmin=39.1 dB 1000 2000 4000 8000 16000 A Z Hz Start time Elapsed time Overload [%] LAIeq [dB] LAFmax [dB] LAFmin [dB] Value 0.00 56.4 65.3 39.1 Time 12:07:00 PM 0:01:00 Date 05/11/2016 dB 05/11/2016 12:07:00 PM - 12:08:00 PM 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 PEC002 Periodic reports 12.50 31.50 63 125 250 500 _ LZeq _ LZFmax - LZFmin Cursor: (A) Leq=47.5 dB LFmax=65.3 dB LFmin=39.1 dB 1000 2000 4000 8000 16000 A Z Hz PEC002 Periodic reports % Based on LAF , 10ms Class width: 0.2 dB 05/11/2016 12:07:00 PM - 12:08:00 PM 100 90 — 80 70 — r - 60 — 50 — 40 — 30 — J L r - J L 20 — 10— r T 0 I I r - 10 20 30 Level r 40 50 60 70 Cumulative Cursor: [74.8 ; 75.0[ dB Level: 0.0% Cumulative: 0.0% 80 90 100 110 120 L1 = 57.5 dB L5 = 53.5 dB L10 = 49.8 dB L50 = 43.3 dB L90 = 40.6 dB L95 = 40.3 dB L99 = 39.8 dB 130 140 dB Site Number: 3 Recorded By: Alesia Hsiao Job Number: 153547 Date: 5/11/2016 Time: 12:26 p.m. Location: Along Klamath Court Source of Peak Noise: Traffic along Pechanga Parkway, birds chirping, dogs parking, residential noise (garage doors, car doors, etc.) Noise Data Leq (dB) Lmin (dB) Lmax (dB) Peak (dB) 58.2 38.7 87.5 86.8 Equipment Category Type Vendor Model Serial No. Cert. Date Note Sound Sound Level Meter Briiel & Kjaer 2250 2548189 1/4/2016 Microphone Briiel & Kjaer 4189 2543364 1/4/2016 Preamp Briiel & Kja r ZC 0032 4265 1/4/2016 Calibrator Briiel & Kja r 4231 2545667 1/4/2016 Weather Data Est. 1 Duration: 10 minutes Sky: t Sunny Note: dBA Offset = 0.01 Sensor Height (ft): 5 ft Wind Ave Speed (mph / m/s) Temperature (degrees Fahrenheit) Barometer Pressure (hPa) 1.2 82.4 29.98 Photo of Measurement Location 2250 Instrument: Time 2250 Application: FSI BZ7225 Version 4.4 Start Time: LAFmin [dB] 05/11/2016 12:26:03 End Time: FS 05/11/2016 12:36:03 Elapsed Time: 58.2 00:10:00 Bandwidth: Time 1 /3 -octave Max Input Level: 0:10:00 138.72 Instrument Serial Number: Time Frequency Broadband (excl. Peak): FSI AZ Broadband Peak: LAFmin [dB] C Spectrum: FS Z Instrument Serial Number: Start time 2548189 Microphone Serial Number: Overload [%] 2543364 Input: LAFmin [dB] Top Socket Windscreen Correction: None Sound Field Correction: 58.2 Free -field Calibration Time: Start time 05/09/2016 17:06:48 Calibration Type: Overload [%] External reference Sensitivity: LAFmin [dB] 64.5731016993523 mV/Pa PEC003 Start time End time Elapsed time Overload [%] LAeq [dB] LAFmax [dB] LAFmin [dB] Value 0.00 58.2 87.5 38.7 Time 12:26:03 PM 12:36:03 PM 0:10:00 Date 05/11/2016 05/11/2016 PEC003 dB 05/11/2016 12:26:03 PM - 12:36:03 PM 140 ; i 11- 130— 120—, 110— 100—L 90 — 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 i i IIIIIIIIIIIiIiiiiioiiii 12.50 31.50 63 125 250 500 _ LZeq _ LZFmax _ LZFmin Cursor: (A) Leq=58.2 dB LFmax=87.5 dB LFmin=38.7 dB 00 1000 2000 4000 8000 16000 A Z Hz PEC003 Based on LAF , 10ms Class width: 0.2 dB 05/11/2016 12:26:03 PM - 12:36:03 PM 100 90- 80- 70 0- 80-70 — 60 — L L 50— 40 — 30 — J L 1 J 7 L J 20 . 10- 0 10 20 Level 30 40 50 60 Cumulative Cursor: [74.8 ; 75.0[ dB Level: 0.0% Cumulative: 0.3% 70 L1 = 59.4 dB L5 = 55.6 dB L10 = 53.9 dB L50 = 49.0 dB L90 = 45.3 dB L95 = 44.0 dB L99 = 41.1 dB 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 dB PEC003 IN Sound Start time Elapsed time dB LAFinax [dB] 140 120 — 100 80 ^� 47.8 49.8 45.4 f 12:31:00 PM L r Lam__ -i 05/11/2016 —_ 1 7 1 20 — 1_•--L jr I r r 7 1 I I I I 12:28:00 PM 12:30:00 PM 12:32:00 PM 12:34:00 PM 12:36:00 PM LAleq LAFmax LCpeak LAFmin Cursor: 05/11/2016 12:31:00 PM - 12:31:10 PM LAleq=47.8 dB LAFinax=49.8 dB LCpeak=74.7 dB LAFmin=45.4 dB PEC003 Start time Elapsed time LAleq [dB] LAFinax [dB] LAFmin [dB] Value 47.8 49.8 45.4 Time 12:31:00 PM 0:00:10 Date 05/11/2016 PEC003 dB 05/11/2016 12:31:00 PM - 12:31:10 PM 140 120 100- 80 — 00- 80— 60 40 20 0 12.50 31.50 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 16000 A Z Hz _ LZeq Cursor: (A) Leq=47.2 dB dB PEC003 Periodic reports • Sound 140 120 — 100— 80— 60— 40 — 20 — Cursor: L r L 1 r l r T I L 1 r r -i LAleq I 12:28:00 12:31:00 I PM 12:30:00 PM LAFmax LCpeak 12:32:00 I PM '2:34:00 LAFmin I t PM 12:36:00 PM 8 dB LAFmin=45.4 dB 05/11/2016 PM - 12:32:00 PM LAleq=51.2 dB LAFmax=55.1 dB LCpeak=86 PEC003 Periodic reports dB 05/11/2016 12:31:00 PM - 12:32:00 PM 140 120 100- 80 00- 80 — 60 40 20 0 PEC003 Periodic reports 12.50 31.50 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 16000 A Z Hz — LZeq _ LZFmax _ LZFmin Cursor: (A) Leq=50.4 dB LFmax=55.1 dB LFmin=45.4 dB Start time Elapsed time Overload [%] LAleq [dB] LAFmax [dB] LAFmin jdB] Value 0.00 51.2 55.1 45.4 Time 12:31:00 PM 0:01:00 Date 05/11/2016 dB 05/11/2016 12:31:00 PM - 12:32:00 PM 140 120 100- 80 00- 80 — 60 40 20 0 PEC003 Periodic reports 12.50 31.50 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 16000 A Z Hz — LZeq _ LZFmax _ LZFmin Cursor: (A) Leq=50.4 dB LFmax=55.1 dB LFmin=45.4 dB 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 PEC003 Periodic reports Based on LAF , 10ms Class width: 0.2 dB 05/11/2016 12:31:00 PM - 12:32:00 PM 10 20 30 40 50 60 Level Cumulative Cursor: [74.8 ; 75.0[ dB Level: 0.0% Cumulative: 0.0% 70 80 90 100 110 120 L1 = 53.2 dB L5 = 52.9 dB L10 = 52.6 dB L50 = 50.0 dB L90 = 46.9 dB L95 = 46.1 dB L99 = 45.7 dB 130 140 dB 2020-21 R Capital Improvement Program Fiscal Years 2018-22 PECHANGA PARKWAY WIDENING Circulation Project Project Description: This project includes the widening of Pechanga Parkway from Via Gilberto to North Casino Drive to provide a Principal Arterial Road with six (6) lanes of traffic. It is the intent of the project to be designed, environmentally cleared, constructed and open to the public prior to the adjacent Pechanga Casino Expansion Project currently scheduled for completion by January 2018. Benefit / Core Value: This project improves pavement conditions so that the transportation needs of the public, business industry, and government can be met. In addition, this project satisfies the City's Core Value of Transportation Mobility and Connectivity. Project Status: Design for this project started during Fiscal Year 2015-16. Construction is scheduled to start in Fiscal Year 2017-18. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.165.530 PW 15-14 Level: I Project Cost: Prior Years Actual Expenditures FYE 2017 Carryover Budget 2017-18 Adopted 2018-19 Appropriation Projected 2019-20 Projected 2021-22 Projected 2020-21 and Future Total Project Projected Years Cost Administration $ 184,710 $ 180,290 $ 365,000 Construction $ 328,391 $ 4,200,000 $ 4,200,000 Construction $ 328,391 $ 4.671,609 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 5,000.000 Engineering $ 110,000 $ 110,000 Design $ 143,681 $ 181,319 $ 325,000 Totals $ 328,391 $ 4,671,609 $ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 5,000,000 Source of Funds: Prior Years FYE 2017 2017-18 Actual Carryover Adopted 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 Total Project Expenditures Budget Appropriation Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost Pechanga Tribe Contributions(1) $ 328,391 $4,671,609 $5,000,000 Total Funding: $ 328,391 $ 4.671,609 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 5,000.000 Future Operation & Maintenance Costs: 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 (1) In accordance with the Intergoeemmental Agreement Apprmed by the City Council on 11/17/2015. 2021-22 Fiscal Years 2018-22 Capital Improvement Program 71 PECHANGA PARKWAY WIDENING Circulation Project Location cf;" " ANL 1 ' Aerial Data - 2015 70 Feet 0 250 500 1,000 Item No. 11 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager 6e. CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Patrick A. Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: March 27, 2018 SUBJECT: Approve the Plans and Specifications, and Authorize Solicitation of Construction Bids for Butterfield Stage Road — Phase III, PW 15-11 PREPARED BY: Amer Attar, Principal Civil Engineer Kendra Hannah-Meistrell, Senior Civil Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the Plans and Specifications, and authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit construction bids for Butterfield Stage Road — Phase III, PW15-11. BACKGROUND: On March 22, 2016, the City Council approved the Third Amendment to the Development Agreement for the Roripaugh Ranch project. As part of this Third Amendment, the City agreed to undertake the construction of the Butterfield Stage Road — Phase III improvements. The Butterfield Stage Road — Phase III project will provide for the full width widening of Butterfield Stage Road to four lanes with a raised median from La Serena Way to Rancho California Road. The project also includes modifications to the existing traffic signal at Butterfield Stage Road and Rancho California Road, as well as widening Rancho California Road from Butterfield Stage Road to Armada Place. On November 26, 2002, the City Council certified the Final Environmental Impact Report prepared for the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan. Project plans and specifications are complete and the project is ready to be advertised for construction bids. The contract documents are available for review in the Director of Public Works' office. The Engineer's Construction Estimate for the project is $6,011,000, and the number of allowable working days is 180, which is nine months. MAYOR PRO TEM NAGGAR AND COUNCIL MEMBER COMERCHERO WILL NOT PARTICIPATE IN COUNCIL CONSIDERTION OF THIS ACTION. Europa Vineyard Estates is located on approximately 290.7 acres southesterly of Butterfield Stage Road and La Serena Way in unincorporated Riverside County. It is owned by Temecula Vineyard Estates, LLC, and is adjacent to Butterfield Stage Road. Neither Mayor Pro Tem Mike Naggar nor Council Member Jeff Comerchero has any direct investments or ownership interests in the Temecula Vineyard Estates, LLC. Europa Vineyard Estates had been owned by Temecula Vineyard Estates, LLC. Europa Vineyard Estates is now owned by an entity related to Temecula Vineyard Estates, LLC, Sirah Vineyard Development Corporation. Council Member Comerchero is the President of Sirah Vineyard Development Corporation. Neither Council Member Comerchero nor Mayor Pro Tem Naggar has any direct investments or ownership interests in the Europa Vineyard Estates Project, Temecula Vineyard Estates, LLC or Sirah Vineyard Development Corporation. The managing member of Temecula Vineyard Estates, LLC, has been Mr. Daniel Stephenson. Council Member Comerchero and Mayor Pro Tem Naggar, however, each have ownership interests and are members of other limited liability companies that are developing property outside of the City of Temecula and in which Mr. Stephenson is also the managing member. The Europa Vineyard Estates Project, Temecula Vineyard Estates, LLC, and Sirah Development Corporation are, therefore, "otherwise related business entities" for Council Member Comerchero and Mayor Pro Tem Naggar within the meaning of § 18700.2 of the FPPC Regulations. Tract Map 32594 for the Europa Vineyard Estates Project was approved by the County of Riverside in September 2006 after the City Council's approval of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan and the Development Agreement in December 2002. One of the County's conditions of approval requires the owners of Europa Vineyard Estates to improve a portion of Butterfield Stage Road along its westerly property line south of La Serena prior to the County's issuance of a certificates of occupancy for homes on 80% of the lots in the Project. The City Attorney has determined that this action will have no material financial effect, indeed no effect at all, on Europa Vineyard Estates, or the owners of the Europa Vineyard Estates project. The Roripaugh Ranch Developers' have been obligated to construct the Phase III Improvements to Butterfield Stage Road since approval of the original Development Agreement and Specific Plan in December 2002 which was prior to the County approval of Europa Vineyard Estates. This obligation has not changed despited the many issues that delayed development of this Project. This is consistent with the Fair Political Practices Commission Legal Staffs March 2008 opinion (A-08-015) allowing Mayor Pro Tem Naggar and Council Member Comerchero's participation in a decision to acquire property located 372 feet south of Europa Villages Estates necessary for the construction of the Phase III Improvements. However, both Mayor Pro Tem Naggar and Council Member Comerchero have elected not to particpate in this action due to the appearance of a conflict as the road improvements are adjacent to the Europa Vineyards Estates project. The approval of the plans and specifications are on the Council's Consent Calendar, so unless the item is pulled by a Council Member for further discussion, Mayor Pro Tem Naggar and Council Member Comerchero will simply need to register an abstention on this item when the vote on the Consent Calendar is called and do not need to leave he dais. FISCAL IMPACT: The Butterfield Stage Road — Phase III project is identified in the City's Capital Improvement Program, Fiscal Years 2018-22, and funded by the original Community Facility District No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) bond proceeds although this bond issue was refunded in 2017. Adequate funds are available for the project. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Project Description 2. Project Location 2018-19 $ 19,484 Capital Improvement Program Fiscal Years 2018-22 BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD EXTENSION Circulation Project Project Description: This project includes the complete design and construction of four lanes on Butterfield Stage Road (from Rancho California Road to Murrieta Hot Springs Road), four lanes on Murrieta Hot Springs Road (from Butterfield Stage Road to the City limits), and two lanes on Calle Chapos (from Butterfield Stage Road to Walcott Road), totaling appro:amately 3.2 miles of road. Benefit / Core Value: This project improves traffic circulation by providing a crucial north and south arterial road on the eastern side of the City. In addition, this project satisfies the City's Core Values of Transportation Mobility and Connectivity. Project Status: Phase I and Phase II of this project (Murrieta Hot Springs Road to La Serena) have been completed. Phase III (La Serena to Rancho California Road) is scheduled to be completed during Fiscal Year 2017-18. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.165.723 PW09-02 & PW 15-11 Level: 1 Project Cost: Prior Years Actual Expenditures 2021-22 FYE 2017 2017-18 Projected Carryover Adopted 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 and Future Total Project Budget Appropriation Projected Projected Projected Years Cost Administration $ 2,222,842 $ 300,220 $ 2,523,062 Acquisition $15,006,728 $ 1,193,936 $ 16,200,664 Construction $12,759,529 $ 9,858,800 $ 22,618,329 Construction $ 590,028 $ 590,028 Engineering $ 449,977 $ 768,000 $ 1,217,977 Design/Environmental $ 636,592 $ 252,312 $ 888,904 Utilities $ 86 $ 914 $ 1,000 Totals $31,075,754 $12,374,182 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 43,449,936 Source of Funds: Prior Years Actual Expenditures FYE 2017 2017-18 Carryover Adopted 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 Total Project Budget Appropriation Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost CFD (Roripaugh Ranch) Reimbursement/Other $29,637,754 $11,466,987 $ 41,104,741 (EMWD) $ 11,622 $ 11,622 Reimbursement/Other (RCWD) $ 590,028 $ 590,028 Reimbursement/Other (Shea Homes) $ 173,808 $ 173,808 Reimbursement/Other (SCE) $ 8,537 $ 8,537 Reimbursement/Other (County of Riverside) $ 123,200 $ 123,200 TUMF $ 1,438,000 $ 1,438,000 Total Funding: $31,075,754 $12,374,182 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 43,449,936 Future Operation & Maintenance Costs: 2017-18 $ 19,102 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 $ 19,874 I $ 20,271 I $ 20,677 Note: Assumes that only minor right-of-way acquisitions would be necessary and that all major right-of-way dedications are voluntary. Fiscal Years 2018-22 Capital Improvement Program 43 BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD EXTENSION Circulation Project Location Aerial Data - 2015 0 500 1,000 Feet 2,000 42 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT CONSENT Item No. 12 ACTION MINUTES March 13, 2018 City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING The Temecula Community Services District meeting convened at 7:57 PM CALL TO ORDER: President Jeff Comerchero ROLL CALL: DIRECTORS: Edwards, Naggar, Rahn, Stewart, Comerchero CSD PUBLIC COMMENTS - None CSD CONSENT CALENDAR 15 Approve the Action Minutes of February 27, 2018 - Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0); Motion by Rahn, Second by Stewart; and electronic vote reflected approval by Comerchero, Edwards, Naggar, Stewart and Rahn. RECOMMENDATION: 15.1 That the Board of Directors approve the Community Services District action minutes and the Joint City Council/Community Services District action minutes of February 27, 2018. CSD DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT CSD GENERAL MANAGER REPORT CSD BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS CSD ADJOURNMENT At 7:59 PM, the Community Services District meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, March 13, 2018, at 5:30 PM for a Closed Session, with a regular session commencing at 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. Jeff Comerchero, President ATTEST: Randi Johl, Secretary [SEAL] CSD Action Minutes 031318 1 DEPARTMENT REPORTS Item No. 13 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Luke Watson, Community Development Director DATE: March 27, 2018 SUBJECT: Community Development Department Monthly Report PREPARED BY: Lynn Kelly -Lehner, Principal Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. The following are the highlights for the Community Development Department for the month of February 2018. CURRENT PLANNING ACTIVITIES: New Cases: In February 2018, Planning received 61 new applications and conducted 5 Public Hearings. A detailed account of current planning activities is attached to this report. Plan Type February 2018 Development Plan 0 Extension of Time 1 Home Occupations 33 Maps 1 Massage Permits 8 Minor Exception 2 Modifications 9 Planning or Zoning Letter 0 Pre Applications 2 Secondary Dwelling Unit 2 Temporary Use Permits 3 Total 61 Town Square Market Place: On January 13, 2015, City Council entered into an Exclusive Negotiating Agreement (ENA) with Truax Development to negotiate the development of the two Successor Agency owned vacant lots, flanking the Town Square Park on the north and south sides of Main Street. A Disposition and Development Agreement was approved by City Council on December 13, 2016. On February 16, 2017, staff received a Development Plan application for the Town Square Market Place. The project will feature 2 three story shell buildings with basements. Each building will total approximately 43,640 square feet. Anticipated uses include retail, food vendors, restaurants, and breweries. A Parcel Merger application was received on June 30, 2017. The project was presented to the Old Town Local Review Board on August 14, 2017. The project was recommended for approval by the Planning Commission on February 7, 2018, and approved by the City Council on February 27, 2018. (JONES) LONG RANGE PLANNING Uptown Temecula Specific Plan: The Uptown Temecula Specific Plan was adopted by the City Council on November 17, 2015. The Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards being developed will serve as a technical companion document to the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan, for City staff to use when reviewing development proposals and to instruct the developer about the street trees, light standards, sidewalk material type, and the plant pallet for any landscaping that may be proposed as part of a development plan. Spurlock Landscape Architects was selected for the project. The first public workshop was held on July 17, 2017. The second public workshop was held on August 31, 2017. The proposed Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards, an update to the New Streets In -Lieu Fee Nexus Study, and proposed Plan amendments were reviewed by the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Ad Hoc Sub Committee on September 26, 2017 and February 20, 2018. These items are anticipated to be reviewed by the Planning Commission and City Council in early 2018. (WEST) Short Term Rentals Ordinance: At the September 6, 2017 Planning Commission meeting, Two Planning Commission members (Turley-Trejo/Guerriero) were chosen to sit on the Short Term Rental Subcommittee to assist staff with developing policy for the City in order to protect residential neighborhoods from the unintended consequences of short term rentals. A two phase approach will be used for this effort. The first phase will involve an extensive public outreach effort. Staff released a Request for Proposals in February of 2018 to solicite consulting firms to assist with the community outreach. The community outreach is anticipated to conclude in late sumer of 2018. The second phase will involve the development development of policies and and ordinance that is an appropriate fit for the City of Temecula and based on the results of the community outreach. The ordinance phase of the project is anticipated to be completed by early 2019. (WEST) Old Town Parking Study: Staff is working with Fehr and Peers Transportation Consultants to update the 2010 Old Town Parking Management Plan. The Study will take a detailed look at existing parking policies, standards, supply and demand within the study area, as well as the effect that planned future development and recently approved and pending projects for the area that may impact future demand. The study will also identify custom strategies and standards for management of the study area parking supply. (WEST) Waves to Wineries: Staff is working with the National Park Service and multiple agencies on the Waves to Wineries Trail Plan(W2W). The purpose of this plan is to unite Temecula wine country with the Pacific Coast by identifying a network of trails along the Santa Margarita River corridor and eventually to the ocean. The goals are to identify existing trails, gaps necessary to connect them, and develop and implement a strategy to fill in the missing links. (PETERS) SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY (SARDA) & AFFORDABLE HOUSING Affordable Housing RFP: The Supportive Housing Subcommittee directed staff to issue an RFP to solicit project proposals from interested developers for the construction of an affordable housing development. In late 2015, the Successor Agency obtained clearance from the Department of Finance $12.4 million of affordable housing funds. The RFP solicited development proposals that address one or more of the following housing needs: seniors, veterans, special needs, transitional, or supportive. The City received twenty proposals from interested developers. Keyser Marston Associates assisted staff in the review and analysis of the proposals. Staff presented the proposals to the Supportive Housing Subcommittee on February 28, 2017. On April 11, 2017, City Council recommended that nine of the original twenty proposals move forward to the next stage in the process. Staff received updated financial information from each of the developers selected to move forward, and interviews were held on January 16, 2018. The City has chosen to move forward with two developers, and will likely enter into a Disposition and Development Agreement with each of them. (WATSON, LEHNER) Affordable Housing Overlay: The City Council adopted the 2014-2021 General Plan Housing Element Update on January 28, 2014, and the City received certification from the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) on March 10, 2014. A project processing schedule has been prepared for the Affordable Housing Overlay Ordinances as required by Programs 1 and 4 of the Housing Element. (WEST) Density Bonus Ordinance: Government Code Section 65915 requires the City to grant a density bonus and incentives or concessions to a developer who agrees to construct or donate land for affordable housing. The proposed ordinance would amend the Development Code to be consistent with State law. (WEST) Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule: As part of the ongoing wind -down of the former Temecula Redevelopment Agency, the Successor Agency (SARDA) is required to complete a Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS) outlining the financial and debt obligations of the former Redevelopment Agency. Based on the outstanding obligations that are due, SARDA makes requests from the Property Tax Trust Fund to make the appropriate payments. On January 23, 2018, the 2017-18 ROPS was approved by SARDA Executive Board for approval, and subsequently SARDA Oversight Board on January 24, prior to the state deadline of February 1, 2018. (WATSON, LEHNER) COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) CDBG Administration: The City will receive $515,274 in CDBG funding for Fiscal Year 2017-18. Staff held two technical workshops for applicants on November 30, 2016. Staff reviewed 14 applications for public service providers and four CIP projects. Staff presented the applications to the Finance Subcommittee for recommendations on February 28, 2017. City Council approved the 2017-18 Action Plan on April 25, 2017. The City anticipates receiving approximately $515,000 in funding for Fiscal Year 2018-19. During the application period for the 2018-19, staff received 10 applications for public service funding. The Finance Committee is scheduled to provide funding recommendations on March 6, 2018. (LEHNER) ENERGY & CONSERVATION Solid Waste and Recycling Program: Staff manages the City's Solid Waste and Recycling Agreement with CR&R and acts as a liaison between the City, CR&R, and their customers. City staff and CR&R coordinate two Citywide Clean-up events each year for residents to dispose of household waste and Targe miscellaneous items that do not fit into the standard residential trash receptacle. The Spring Citywide Clean-up is scheduled for May 12, 2018. Staff also assists with outreach for the Riverside County Mobile Household Hazardous Waste Collection events and the Composting Workshops. (WEST) BUILDING & SAFETY Building and Safety statistics for February 2018 are highlighted in the following table. Building and Safety Statistics February 2018 Permits 268 New Commercial Addition 1 Photovoltaic 64 Tenant Improvements 18 Non Construction C of 0 41 Inspections 1,332 Inspections Per Day 60.50 Inspections Per Person Per Day 15.14 Visitors to Counter 1,229 Tenant Improvements Cafe Rio — 40705 Winchester Road Pita Pan — 32483 Temecula Parkway Pizza Press — 30010 Temecula Parkway Certificate of Occupancy Pacific Eye Institute — 41877 Enterprise Curcle North Cartwheels Gymnastics — 26201 Ynez Road CODE ENFORCEMENT During the month of February, Code Enforcement responded to 31 web complaints. In addition, the division opened 135 code cases and forwarded 17 referrals to Public Works, Police, Animal Control, and Fire. Detailed Code Enforcement case activity can be found in the following chart: Type of Code Case Total Abandoned or Inoperable Vehicle 7 Vacant Home / Property Maintenance / Rodent/ Mold 17 Business or Home Occupation w/o license/CUP 7 Trash and Debris / Dumping 6 Overgrown Vegetation / Weeds / Fire Hazard 7 Green Pool / Vector Control 2 Graffiti 9 Noise/Nuisance/Animal Control 18 Trailer / RV Stored/Boat/Parking 25 Construction w/o Permit/Building Code 8 Encroach Public ROW / Trash Cans 22 Zoning/Signs 6 Public Safety & Health 1 Total Number of Cases 135 Foreclosure Tracking: Code Enforcement works with the local real estate community to monitor foreclosures, defaults and real estate owned properties. The following charts demonstrate the past six months of activities in Temecula. Residential Foreclosure Tracking Commercial Foreclosure Tracking Sept October November December January February DEFAULT 2017 2017 2017 2017 2018 2018 DEFAULT 74 74 70 67 56 57 FORECLOSED 52 53 60 61 73 78 REO 61 60 62 62 45 43 TOTALS 187 187 192 190 174 178 Commercial Foreclosure Tracking ATTACHMENT: Current Planning Activity Report Sept 2017 October 2017 November 2017 December 2017 January 2018 February 2018 DEFAULT 0 0 0 0 2 4 FORECLOSED 0 0 6 5 1 1 REO 4 5 7 7 3 5 TOTALS 4 5 6 5 6 10 ATTACHMENT: Current Planning Activity Report PLANNING ACTIVITY REPORT Assigned Planner Approval PA Number Project Address APN Apply Date Date Applicant Company Owner Plan Type Status PA18-0185 40820 Winchester Rd Temecula, CA 92591 910-420-030 Scott Cooper 02/01/2018 02/01/2018 Ed DeLeon Case Title / Description: A Major Temporary Use Permit to allow Hokulia Authentic Hawaiian Shaved Ice of Temecula to operate a kiosk at an exterior location of the Promenade Mall for one year from the time of issuance. The project is located at 40820 Winchester Road. Previous TUP (PA15-0878) TEMECULA PL Temporary Approved TOWNE Use Permit CENTER ASSOC PA18-0188 42315 Via Consuelo 918-291-007 Jaime Cardenas 02/01/2018 02/01/2018 Brian Alvarez Temecula, CA 92592 Case Title / Description: Inland Meadows Photography: a home occupation business license for photography services. PL Home Approved Occupation PA18-0189 46043 Drymen Ave Temecula, CA 92592 962-420-021 Jaime Cardenas 02/01/2018 02/01/2018 New Dimension New Dimension PL Home Approved Global Corp Global Corp Occupation Case Title / Description: New Dimension Global Corp: a home occupation business license promoting international idea exchanges for landscape, architecture and urban planning. PA18-0192 44730 Gabrielle Ln (Change 961-381-004 Jaime Cardenas 02/01/2018 02/01/2018 Miguel Aispuro Of Address) Temecula, CA 92592 Case Title / Description: Reliance Business Solutions: a home occupation business providing medical billing consulting services. Temecula Creek PL Home Approved Villas Occupation PA18-0199 43283 Via Sabino Temecula, CA 92592 965-360-004 Jaime Cardenas 02/01/2018 Scott Baker Case Title / Description: Noll ADU Minor Exception Permit: a minor exception application to approve a 1% square footage increase in lot coverage for a proposed accessory dwelling unit to the existing property located at 43283 Via Sabino. Lisa Noll PL Minor Void Exception PA18-0202 29601 Mira Loma Dr 944-060-006 Brandon Rabidou 02/01/2018 02/13/2018 Susan Paradiso Temecula, CA 92592 Case Title / Description: Indigo Place: A Minor Modification (Planning Review Only) to alter the pool ADA access for Indigo Place located at Tract 33584 DR HORTON PL Modifications Approved Page 1 of 8 PA Number Project Address APN Assigned Planner Approval Date Applicant Apply Date Company Owner Plan Type Status PA18-0203 42627 Indigo PI Temecula, CA 92592 944-060-006 Brandon Rabidou 02/01/2018 02/08/2018 Susan Paradiso Case Title / Description: Indigo Place TUP: A Temporary Use Permit to allow for a temporary generator for the Indigo Place model homes from February 7, 2018 to March 25, 2018 (operating from 8:30 a.m. to 6:30 p.m.) located at TR 33584 DR HORTON PL Temporary Approved Use Permit PA18-0207 Case Title / Description: Permit Voided Temp Account 02/02/2018 Bluewater Bluewater PL Massage Cancelled Temecula LP Temecula LP Permits PA18-0208 27725 Jefferson Jaime Cardenas 02/02/2018 Case Title / Description: Blue Water Massage MEP: a Massage Establishment Renewal for Blue Water Massage located at 27725 Jefferson Ave #106 Blue Water Blue Water PL Massage Massage Massage Permits Plan Review PA18-0209 40710 Winchester Rd 910-420-029 Jaime Cardenas 02/02/2018 Temecula, CA 92591 Case Title / Description: Sears/Roundl Facade MOD: a Major Modification to the existing Sears building's exterior elevations including new paint schemes, stone across the base of the building, new architectural elements, materials and redesigned entry for a proposed Roundl indoor entertainment facility and restaurant on the lower level at 40710 Winchester Road. Maria Estrada Seritage PL Modifications Plan Review PA18-0211 40236 Lombardy St 957-770-036 Eric Jones 02/05/2018 02/05/2018 Diane Rodriguez ERIC MINJAREZ PL Home Approved Temecula, CA 92591 Occupation Case Title / Description: Judgement Enforcement Recovery Group Home Occupation: - Filing Documents (judgements) PA18-0212 29676 Rancho Califomia Rd 921-320-053 Scott Cooper 02/05/2018 02/28/2018 Jennifer Steen Dayton Hudson PL Modifications Approved Temecula, CA 92591 Corp. Case Title / Description: Target MOD: A Modification (Planning Review Only) to a previously approved Modification (PA17-0257) to remove wood panel accent from the secondary entrance and replace with red EIFS and to paint the existing tile framing of the main entrance red. The project is located at 29676 Rancho California Road. PA18-0214 33473 Corte Figueroa Temecula, CA 92592 965-361-042 Scott Cooper 02/05/2018 02/05/2018 Traci Williams Case Title / Description: A Loving Way to Parent (Home Occupation): Parenting classes done by phone or at other locations. Residence used as an office. PL Home Approved Occupation Page 2 of 8 Assigned Planner Approval PA Number Project Address APN Apply Date Date Applicant Company Owner Plan Type Status PA18-0215 41593 Winchester Rd Temecula, CA 92590 909-281-019 Scott Cooper 02/06/2018 Case Title / Description: Brea Imperial Center TPM: A Tentative Parcel Map w/ waiver to subdivide an existing parcel map into two individual lots. The project is located at 41593 Winchester Road Rod Bradley BREA IMPERIAL PL Maps Plan Review CENTER PA18-0216 39700 Barberry Ct Temecula, CA 92591 920-142-017 Brandon Rabidou 02/06/2018 02/06/2018 DANIEL WHELAN Case Title / Description: DME Solutions Home Occupation - A home occupation for a home Health Service Equipment Provider at 39700 Barberry Court DANIEL PL Home Approved WHELAN Occupation PA18-0218 45405 Via Jaca Temecula, CA 92592 962-113-003 Brandon Rabidou 02/06/2018 02/06/2018 Peace Of Mind Peace Of Mind PL Home Approved Electric Electric Occupation Case Title / Description: Peace Of Mind Electric Home Occupation: A home occupation permit for Peace of Mind Electric to operate at 45405 Via Jaca PA18-0219 39700 Barberry Ct Temecula, CA 92591 920-142-017 Jaime Cardenas 02/06/2018 Andrea Bizderi Case Title / Description: DME Solutions: a home occupation business license for online retail sales of medical devices. PL Home Occupation Plan Review PA18-0220 41840 Vardon Dr 953-290-024 Brandon Rabidou 02/06/2018 02/06/2018 CV Schaefer CV Schaefer Temecula, CA 92591 Case Title / Description: CV Schaefer Home Occupation: A home occupation permit for CV Schaefer to operate at 41840 Vardon Drive PL Home Approved Occupation PA18-0222 44659 Camino Gonzales 960-145-001 Jaime Cardenas 02/06/2018 Temecula, CA 92592 Case Title / Description: Shannon Winters McCarthy: a home occupation business license for education and tutoring services. Shannon Winters McCarthy JOSEPH PL Home WINTERS Occupation Plan Review PA18-0225 31575 Enfield Ln 957-170-012 Jaime Cardenas 02/07/2018 02/22/2018 Douglas Temecula, CA 92591 Case Title / Description: Gazebo One: a home occupation business license for gazebo sales, billing and record keeping. Damewood Julie Heiner PL Home Approved Foley Occupation PA18-0226 39840 Longleaf St Temecula, CA 92591 916-320-020 Brandon Rabidou 02/08/2018 02/08/2018 Maria Marquez Case Title / Description: Temecula Events & Party Rentals Home Occupation - A party rental home occupation permit at 39840 Longleaf Street FELIPE PL Home Approved MARQUEZ Occupation Page 3 of 8 PA Number Project Address APN Assigned Planner Approval Apply Date Date Applicant Company Owner Plan Type Status PA18-0227 43283 Via Sabino Temecula, CA 92592 965-360-004 Jaime Cardenas 02/08/2018 Case Title / Description: Noll Residence ADU: An Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) Permit to allow for 387 square foot ADU at 43283 Via Sabino Powell & Powell & Associates Associates Lisa Knoll PL Secondary Dwelling Unit Plan Review PA18-0228 43283 Via Sabino Temecula, CA 92592 965-360-004 Jaime Cardenas 02/08/2018 Case Title / Description: Noll ADU Minor Exception: a minor exception application to approve a 1% square footage increase in lot coverage for a proposed accessory dwelling unit (under PA18-0227) to the existing property located at 43283 Via Sabino. Powell & Powell & Associates Associates Lisa Noll PL Minor Exception Plan Review PA18-0237 44260 Apis Rd 960-020-026 Brandon Rabidou 02/09/2018 Adan Alicea Naythan PL Modifications Plan Review Temecula, CA 92592 Properties LLC Case Title / Description: Redhawk Car Wash Storage Building MOD: A Modification for the addition of a 660 square foot storage building located at 44260 Apis Road. PA18-0239 27464 Commerce Center Dr 921-480-053 Jaime Cardenas 02/12/2018 Temecula, CA 92590 Case Title / Description: Su's Massage Place MEP: a Massage Establishment Permit for Su's Massage Place located at 27464 Commerce Center Drive, Suite B. Xiang Su TEMECULA PL Massage Plan Review LEGACY PROP Permits PA18-0240 32432 Guevara Dr 959-321-043 Jaime Cardenas 02/12/2018 02/12/2018 Samantha Temecula, CA 92592 Case Title / Description: Soul Simplicity LLC: a home occupation business license specializing in clients personal organizing and cleaning services. Leverance PL Home Approved Occupation PA18-0241 32503 Angelo Dr 955-473-018 Jaime Cardenas 02/12/2018 03/15/2018 Carol Toone Temecula, CA 92592 Case Title / Description: Carol S. Toone and Associates: a home occupation business license tp provide management consulting to municipal and other public agencies. HANS LIANG PL Home Approved Occupation PA18-0249 31947 Calle Galarza 959-112-015 Jaime Cardenas 02/13/2018 02/13/2018 Bluefin Pools Bluefin Pools Temecula, CA 92592 Case Title / Description: Bluefin Pools: a home occupation business license for a construction company specializing in residential swimming pools. PL Home Approved Occupation PA18-0250 30395 Cabrillo Ave 922-150-020 Jaime Cardenas 02/13/2018 02/13/2018 Mike Richardson Mike PL Home Approved Temecula, CA 92592 Richardson Occupation Case Title / Description: Mike Richardson: a home occupation business license for underground utility locating services. Page 4 of 8 Assigned Planner Approval PA Number Project Address APN Apply Date Date Applicant Company Owner Plan Type Status PA18-0253 32503 Angelo Dr 955-473-018 Jaime Cardenas 02/13/2018 02/13/2018 Carol Toone Temecula, CA 92592 Case Title / Description: Carol S. Toone: a home occupation business license focused on providing training and resources entities on both public and private sectors. HANS LIANG PL Home Approved Occupation PA18-0258 919-350-020 Brandon Rabidou 02/14/2018 03/08/2018 Jarnne' Gardner Lennar Homes of PL Modifications Approved (Valdez) California, Inc. Case Title / Description: Nicolas Heights Wall & Fence MOD: A Minor Modification (Planning Review Only) to add a new 56" vinyl wall fence detail for lots 26, 29, 30, and 31 and an update to the wall returns on lots 5, 7, 8, 14, 26, 29, 30, 31 and 35 for Nicolas Heights (TR 36479) PA18-0259 41493 Margarita Rd 921-830-010 Brandon Rabidou 02/14/2018 Temecula, CA 92591 Case Title / Description: Promenade Optometry & Lasik: A Minor Modification (Planning Review Only) to alter the location of two windows and doors at 41493 Margarita Road, Suite G-109. PFP Temecula Real Estate Holdings PL Modifications Plan Review PA18-0260 30305 Via Norte Temecula, CA 92591 919-122-005 Jaime Cardenas 02/14/2018 02/14/2018 Leslie Patrick (L. Case Title / Description: SFM Constructors, Inc.: a home occupation business license for construction consulting services. Leslie Patrick (L. PL Home Approved Patrick) Burtt Patrick) Burtt Occupation PA18-0263 28636 Old Town Front St 922-034-036 Jaime Cardenas 02/15/2018 Julia Burns MICHAEL PL Massage Plan Review Temecula, CA 92590 THESING Permits Case Title / Description: The Spa MEP: a Massage Establishment Permit renewal for The Spa located at 28636 Old Town Front Street, Suite 200 and 103. PA18-0266 31553 Via Santa Ines 961-065-008 Eric Jones Temecula, CA 92592 02/15/2018 Carlos La Case Title / Description: The Aquaponics God Store: sales of aquaponics equipment PL Home Occupation Plan Review PA18-0273 30218 Santiago Rd 945-080-024 Eric Jones 02/16/2018 Gigi Moyer PL Secondary Out Temecula, CA 92592 Dwelling Unit Case Title / Description: Moyer Residence ADU: An Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) application to allow for a 1,173 square foot ADU at 30218 Santiago Road PA18-0276 31017 EI Osito Ct Temecula, CA 92592 918-381-026 Eric Jones 02/20/2018 Oscar Vargas Case Title / Description: A home occupation business license for L.C. Budget Pressure Wash PL Home Occupation Plan Review Page 5 of 8 PA Number Project Address APN Assigned Planner Approval Apply Date Date Applicant Company Owner Plan Type Status PA18-0279 42071 Cosmic Dr Temecula, CA 92592 944-252-001 Jaime Cardenas 02/21/2018 Kevin Giguere Case Title / Description: Matus Patio Enclosure MOD: a Minor Modification (Planning Review Only) to approve a 400 square -foot enclosed patio addition to the property located at 42071 Cosmic Drive. Peter Matus PL Modifications Plan Review PA18-0281 27457 Lovettsville Ln Temecula, CA 92591 916-700-040 Jaime Cardenas 02/21/2018 Jason Saich Case Title / Description: Higher Quality Construction: a home occupation business license for a general construction company. PL Home Occupation Plan Review PA18-0283 32000 Paseo Parallon 961-152-006 Jaime Cardenas 02/21/2018 02/21/2018 Mary Vegter Temecula, CA 92592 Case Title / Description: Tommy & Mama's Pool Service: a home occupation business license providing residential pool cleaning services. PL Home Approved Occupation PA18-0284 31346 Corte Sonora 954-151-013 Brandon Rabidou 02/21/2018 02/21/2018 Thick Thick PL Home Approved Temecula, CA 92592 Skateboards Skateboards Occupation Case Title / Description: Thick Skateboards Home Occupation: A home occupation permit for a clothing apparel/skateboard design company (Thick Skateboards). PA18-0290 32639 Miller Ct 953-482-039 Jaime Cardenas 02/22/2018 02/22/2018 Jeanette Maines TAD WUERTZ PL Home Approved Temecula, CA 92592 Occupation Case Title / Description: Rhea Lana's of Temecula Valley: a home occupation business license for managing administrative operations for children's consignment events. PA18-0292 31130 S General Kearny Rd , 953-050-036 Jaime Cardenas 02/22/2018 02/22/2018 James Sarracino 49 Temecula, CA 92591 Case Title / Description: JLS Painting Specialties: a home occupation business license for residential interior painting services. Carefree PL Home Communities CA Occupation Approved PA18-0293 27648 Ynez Rd 921-320-012 Jaime Cardenas 02/23/2018 Arnold Whitaker Temecula Town PL Modifications Plan Review Temecula, CA 92591 Center Case Title / Description: Temecula Town Center Minor Modification Planning Review Only: A Minor Modification to allow for the addition of an ADA path of travel within the existing Temecula Town Center. Three parking spaces will need to be removed. The project is located at 27648 Ynez Road. PA18-0294 29379 Rancho Califomia Rd 944-290-004 Jaime Cardenas 02/23/2018 Dawnn Russell GARY PL Massage Plan Review Temecula, CA 92592 MCMILLAN Permits Case Title / Description: Dawnn Russell HHP Massage Establishment Renewal: A massage establishment license for HHP Massage to operate a massage establishment at 29379 Rancho California Road (Suite 200) Page 6 of 8 PA Number Project Address APN Assigned Planner Approval Apply Date Date Applicant Company Owner Plan Type Status PA18-0299 33320 Temecula Pky 965-410-003 Jaime Cardenas 02/26/2018 Rose Corona Corona Family PL Temporary Plan Review Temecula, CA 92592 LTD Partnership Use Permit Case Title / Description: Big Horse Pumpkin and Harvest Festival Major Temporary Use Permit: A Major Temporary Use Permit to allow a Harvest festival to be located on the northeast corner of Temecula Parkway and Butterfield Stage Road. The festival will feature pumpkin patch, corn maze, car show and a 5K run. The event will be held September 29th through October 31st 2018 from 1 pm to 6 pm. Weekend hours will be from 10 am to 5 pm. PA18-0301 29507 Cara Way Temecula, CA 92591 921-292-049 Jaime Cardenas 02/26/2018 02/26/2018 Scott Zeida Case Title / Description: Tee 4 Life: a home occupation business license for online order management for golf products. PL Home Approved Occupation PA18-0302 29507 Cara Way 921-292-049 Jaime Cardenas 02/26/2018 02/26/2018 Scott Zeida Temecula, CA 92591 Case Title / Description: DZ Pack and Marketing: a home occupation business license for website management and consultation. PL Home Approved Occupation PA18-0305 41964 Main St 922-044-023 Jaime Cardenas 02/26/2018 Temecula, CA 92590 Case Title / Description: Pure Skin Care & Beauty Boutique MEP: a new massage establishment permit for Pure Silk Skin Care and Beauty Boutique located at 41964 Main Street Suite H. Kymberly Blawn KER PL Massage Plan Review Permits PA18-0308 41770 Margarita Rd , 1044 921-330-033 Jaime Cardenas 02/26/2018 02/26/2018 TJD Graphics TJD Graphics Temecula, CA 92591 Case Title / Description: TJD Graphics: a home occupation business license specializing in freelance graphic design. PL Home Approved Occupation PA18-0309 28895 Vallejo Ave 922-130-007 Jaime Cardenas 02/26/2018 02/26/2018 Scott Partridge JENNIFER PL Home Approved Temecula, CA 92592 TREBLER Occupation Case Title / Description: Captured Lifestyles Photography: a home occupation business license for photographic services. PA18-0313 41669 Winchester Rd 909-282-014 Jaime Cardenas 02/27/2018 Temecula, CA 92590 Case Title / Description: Massage Establishment Renewal: Relax Zone Massage located at 41669 Winchester Road Scott Hudson Relax Zone Winchester PL Massage Plan Review Massage, LLC Place Permits PA18-0314 42624 Indigo PI Temecula, CA 92592 944-060-006 Brandon Rabidou 02/27/2018 Susan Paradiso Case Title / Description: Indigo Place Wall MOD: a modification application to approve an as -built combo wall (originally shown on plans as CMU under PA#) DR HORTON PL Modifications Plan Review Page 7 of 8 PA Number Project Address APN Assigned Planner Approval Apply Date Date Applicant Company Owner Plan Type Status PA18-0315 31741 Temecula Pky Temecula, CA 92592 961-080-022 Jaime Cardenas 02/27/2018 Jian hua Zhao Case Title / Description: Temecula Massage Renewal Application: a Massage Establishment Permit for Temecula Massage located at 31741 Temecula Parkway, Suite B. NEW PLAN PL Massage EXCEL REALTY Permits TRUST INC Plan Review PA18-0316 31915 Rancho Califomia Rd 954-030-002 Jaime Cardenas 02/27/2018 02/27/2018 Alisia Ramirez Marco Ramirez PL Home Approved Temecula, CA 92592 Occupation Case Title / Description: Bonjour Amour Mathmaking, LLC: a home occupation business license for matchmaking and date coaching services. PA18-0317 32419 Alpine Ct 962-520-062 Jaime Cardenas 02/27/2018 02/27/2018 Livingstyle, LLC Livingstyle, LLC Temecula, CA 92592 Case Title / Description: Livingstyle, LLC: a home occupation business license for wedding and lifestyle services between vendors and customers. PL Home Approved Occupation PA18-0319 44280 Campanula way 959-090-011 Eric Jones 02/28/2018 Daniel Dobron Thomas Olds PL Extension of Plan Review Temecula, CA 92592 Time Case Title / Description: Temecula Healthcare Center Extension of Time: The first Extension of Time application for the previously approved Temecula Health Care Center located at 44320 Campanula Way. PA18-0320 45070 Corte Carolina 961-192-028 Scott Cooper 02/28/2018 02/28/2018 Harold PL Home Approved Temecula, CA 92592 McGruther Occupation Case Title / Description: Purple Crayon Project, Inc. (Home Occupation) - Creative Services, Graphic Design, Consultation PA18-0323 40619 Cebu Dr 957-571-016 Jaime Cardenas 02/28/2018 02/28/2018 Manuel Llanura Manuel Llanura PL Home Approved Temecula, CA 92591 Occupation Case Title / Description: Manny Llanura Photography: a home occupation business license providing fashion and event photography services. PREAPP18-0 28999 Old Town Front St 922-110-038 Scott Cooper 02/01/2018 02/15/2018 Larry Slusser The Legacy STEWART PL Completed 200 Temecula, CA 92590 Group Inc GROUP Pre -Application Case Title / Description: River Springs Charter School Preapp: a pre -application to review a proposed school for the property located at 28999 Old Town Front Street. PREAPP18-0 30580 Rancho California Rd 921-700-004 Scott Cooper 02/08/2018 02/21/2018 Jeff Herbst RED PL Completed 231 Temecula, CA 92591 Development Pre -Application LLC Case Title / Description: Palomar Village Shopping Center: A pre -application for Palomar Village Shopping Center to alter the exterior elevations and add patios at building A. Page 8 of 8 Item No. 14 Approvals City Attorney Jk- Director of Finance City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Charlie DeHart, Division Chief DATE: March 27, 2018 SUBJECT: Fire Deparment Monthly Report PREPARED BY: Wendy Miller, Administrative Assistant RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive and file the Fire Department Monthly Report. Riverside County Fire Department/ CAL FIRE Emergency Incident Statistics Daniel R. Talbot Fire Chief 3/5/2018 Report Provided By: Riverside County Fire Department Communications and Technology Division GIS Section Please refer to Map and Incident by Battalion, Station, Jurisdiction Incidents Reported for the month of February,2018 and Temecula City Page 1 of 6 *Incidents are shown based on the primary response area for the incident location. This does not represent total response times for all units only the first unit in. Response Activity Incidents Reported for the month of February,2018 and Temecula City Com Fire False Alarm Haz Mat Medical Multi-Fam Dwelling Fire Other Fire Other Misc Public Service Assist Res Fire Ringing Alarm Standby Traffic Collision Wildland Fire • Com Fire 2 0.3% is False Alarm 80 11.2% • Haz Mat 4 0.6% • Medical 520 72.7% • Multi-Fam Dwelling Fire 2 0.3% Other Fire 9 1.3% • Other Misc 3 0.4% • Public Senice Assist 25 3.5% • Res Fire 1 0.1% • Ringing Alarm 2 0.3% • Standby 3 0.4% Traffic Collision 60 8.4% '*- wldland Fire 4 0.6% Total: 715 100.0% 2 80 4 520 2 9 3 25 1 2 3 60 4 Incident Total: Average Enroute to Onscene Time= Enroute Time = When a unit has been acknowledged as responding. Onscene Time = When a unit has been acknowledge as being on scene. For anv other statistic outside Enroute to Onscene please contact the IT Help Desk at 951-940-6900 715 <5 Minutes +5 Minutes +10 Minutes +20 Minutes Average % 0 to 5 min 465 190 27 4 4.6 67.8% The following incidents are included in the total number of records but not in the average time HZM, HZMMC, OAC, OAF, OAM, OAMAD, OAMAI, OAMTE, OAMVA, OAP, OAR, OAV, OUT, OOU, LEB, LEO, LEI, BRNPMT, OES, PAA, PAD, PAF, PAO, PAP, HFS, HFSAM, HFSCA, HSBT, HSBTC, HSBTS, HSBTV, HSE, HSG Last Updated 3/5/2018 3:C *Incidents are shown based on the primary response area for the incident location. This does not represent total response times for all units only the first unit in. Page 2 of 6 Incidents by Battalion, Station and Jurisdiction Com False Haz Mat Medical Multi -Fa Other Other Public Res Ringing Standby Traffic Wildlan Fire Alarm m Fire Misc Service Fire Alarm Collisio d Fire Station 12 Temecula Station 73 Rancho California Station 83 French Valley Station 84 Parkview Station 92 Wolf Creek Station 95 Roripaugh Ranch Battalion Total Grand Total Last Updated 3/5/2018 3:C Temecula Station Total 1 19 0 92 1 2 1 4 0 2 1 22 1 Total 146 19 0 92 1 2 1 4 0 2 1 22 1 T emec.da 1 20 1 150 0 4 0 7 0 0 2 23 1 Station Total 1 20 1 150 0 4 0 7 0 0 23 emELJia 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Station Total Temecaa Station Total Temecula Station Total 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 1 135 1 0 0 8 1 0 0 7 2 146 209 209 3 0 14 1 135 1 0 0 8 1 0 0 7 2 0 22 1 112 0 2 0 5 0 0 0 6 0 22 1 112 0 2 0 5 0 0 0 6 0 Temecula 5 1 28 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 2 0 Station Total 28 3 169 169 148 148 40 40 2 80 4 520 2 9 3 25 1 2 3 60 4 715 2 80 4 520 2 9 3 25 1 2 3 60 4 715 *Incidents are shown based on the primary response area for the incident location. This does not represent total response times for all units only the first unit in. Page 3 of 6 Incidents by Jurisdiction emecula Com Fire False Haz Mat Medical Multi -Fa Other Other Public Res Fire Ringing Standby Traffic Wildland Alarm m Fire Misc Service Alarm Collision Fire Grand Total Last Updated 3/5/2018 3:C 80 4 520 2 9 3 25 2 60 4 'Incidents are shown based on the primary response area for the incident location. This does not represent total response times for all units only the first unit in. Page 4 of 6 2 2 80 80 4 4 520 520 2 2 9 9 3 3 25 25 1 1 2 2 3 3 60 60 4 4 Total 715 715 Incidents by Supervisorial District - Summary DISTRICT 3 CHUCK Grand Total Com Fire False Alarm Haz Mat Medical Multi-Fam Dwelling Fire Other Fire Other Misc Public Service Assist Res Fire Ringing Alarm Standby Traffic Collision Wildland Fire Last Updated 3/5/2018 3:C *Incidents are shown based on the primary response area for the incident location. This does not represent total response times for all units only the first unit in. Page 5 of 6 MONTH = 2 and YEAR = 2018 and CITYNAME = 'Temecula' PIA :a • • Stntion95 ' !sr •` l • • 3 Se M MI W,$ • • s • • • • ` • • • • • tion Ba. • i •• • • • • Buck Mese co V P A U 8 A VALLEY •• •1 • • • I i • Sation92 • • • PECHARCA CASIN© AND RV tt i on 02 0 Pechanga Legend • Fie • Medical • Hazard • 'Other Mis G Haz Mat FSA Last Updated 3/5/2018 3:C Rive+side County Fie Station Reservations Casinos U 4 Riverside County Fire GIS *Incidents are shown based on the primary response area for the incident location. This does not represent total response times for all units only the first unit in. Page 6 of 6 2018 City of Temecula Fire Department Emergency Response and Training Totals PUBLIC SAFETY CLASS TOTALS 2018 Class Totals Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Total CPR/AED 7 27 34 FIRST AID 9 8 17 HCP 14 1 15 TCC Training 118 0 118 CERT 0 0 0 TEEN CERT 0 0 0 Total 148 36 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 184 INCIDENT/RESPONSE TOTALS FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA 2018 Incident Response Totals Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Total COMMERCIAL FIRE 0 2 2 FALSE ALARM 68 80 148 HAZ MAT 4 4 8 MEDICAL AID 529 520 1049 MUTI FAMILY DWELLING 0 2 2 OTHER FIRE 5 9 14 OTHER MISC. 4 3 7 PSA 42 25 67 RINGING ALARM 1 2 3 RESIDENTIAL FIRE 2 1 3 RESCUE 1 60 61 STANDBY 14 3 17 TRAFFIC COLLISSION 69 0 69 VEHICLE FIRE 1 0 1 WILDLAND FIRE 1 4 5 Total 741 715 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1456 Peu 600 40C, ion 200 FIRE DEPARTMENT CLASS TOTAL COMPARISON 2017 vs. 2018 MONTH 2017 YTD 2018 YTD JANUARY 36 30 FEBRUARY 16 36 MARCH 11 APRIL 112 MAY 207 JUNE 68 )ULY 82 AUGUST 128 SEPTEMBER 84 OCTOBER 71 NOVEMBER 27 DECEMBER 0 TOTAL TO DATE 842 66 S~ GJ PJ ■ 2017 YTD 40 4'4? Q ❑ 2018 YTD 0P 0�" 0``Q ;<' O �f �f 00 06 a0 OAC • OO 9000 8000 7000 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 FIRE DEPARTMENT TOTAL CALL COMPARISON 2017 vs. 2018 ' \ ' QL▪ D PQ MONTH 2017 YTD 2018 YTD JANUARY 741 741 FEBRUARY 675 715 MARCH 771 APRIL 706 MAY 731 JUNE 686 JULY 710 AUGUST 704 SEPTEMBER 648 OCTOBER 735 NOVEMBER 669 DECEMBER 697 TOTAL TO DATE 8473 1456 J‘� • 00• <t5" �0�� OP�� QJ QqF OC 4" CF a0 � 4 S 2017 YTD El 2018 YTD Fire Department Temecula Battalion Fire Stations- Public Education Reporting Month: February Reporting Stations: 12, 73, 84, 92 & 95 Reporting Year: 2018 PR and Public Education Programs: Total Number of Events Event Type Total Number of Hours for Reporting Month 2 School Event 3 0 Adult Education 0 Number of Public Contacts: 50 0 0 Fair/Safety Expo 0 • 3 Display 3 17 Station Tour 11 0 Fire Safety Trailer 0 0 Other 0 Field Inspections: Total Number of Initial Field Inspections for Reporting Month 0 0 25 59 0 0 LE -100's (Weed Abatement) Total Number of LE -100 Inspections for Reporting Month 0 Total Number of Re -inspections for Reporting Month 0 Prevention Referrals: Total Number of Fire Prevention Referrals for Reporting Month 0 Significant Events: Provide a brief synopsis of significant TC's, Fires, Near Drowning's, Road Closures etc... Include photos if available. The Temecula Fire department responded to over 500 significant calls within the month of February. These calls included several major traffic collisions which resulting in transports to the hospitals. The Temecula Fire department also assisted Murrieta and Pechanga fire with medical aids. Item No. 15 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Lisa McConnell, Chief of Police DATE: March 27, 2018 SUBJECT: Police Department Monthly Report (February) PREPARED BY: James Rayls, Lieutenant RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. The following report reflects the activity of the Temecula Police Department for the month of December 2017. PATROL SERVICES Overall calls for police service 6,649 "Priority One" calls for service 56 Average response time for "Priority One" calls 5.82 VOLUNTEERS Volunteer administration hours 150 Special Events hours 35 Community Action Patrol (CAP) hours 482 Reserve officer hours (patrol) 32 Training/Meeting hours 314 Total Volunteer hours 1013 CRIME PREVENTION Crime prevention workshops/Neighborhood watch meetings conducted 0/1 Safety presentations/Training 0/0 Special events 0 Residential/Business security surveys conducted 0/0 Businesses visited 3 Residences/Businesses visited for past crime follow-up 1/1 Station Tour 1 Planning Review Projects/Temp Outdoor Use Permits 3/2 Sq. Footage of Graffiti Removed 1,843 OLD TOWN STOREFRONT Total customers served 263 Sets of fingerprints taken 54 Police reports filed 67 Citations signed off 24 Total receipts $2,143 SPECIAL TEAMS (POP / SET) On sight felony arrests 27 On sight misdemeanor arrests 20 Felony arrest warrants served 7 Misdemeanor arrest warrants served 11 Follow-up investigations 19 Parole/Probation Searches 23 Pedestrian Checks 37 Traffic Stops/Vehicle Checks 26 Crime Free Housing Checks 0 TRAFFIC Citations issued for hazardous violations 853 Grant funded D.U.I. / Traffic safety checkpoints 0 Grant funded traffic click it or ticket 0 D.U.I. Arrests 35 Non -hazardous citations 660 Stop Light Abuse/Intersection Program (S.L.A.P.) citations 170 Neighborhood Enforcement Team (N.E.T.) citations 0 Parking citations 107 School Zone 0 Seatbelts 32 CeII Phone Cites 190 Injury collisions 25 INVESTIGATIONS Beginning Caseload 281 Total Cases Assigned 32 Total Cases Closed 156 Search Warrants Served 7 Arrests 4 Out of Custody Filings 7 PROMENADE MALL TEAM Calls for service 354 Felony arrest/filings 4 Misdemeanor arrest/filings 14 Traffic Citations 3 Fingerprints/Livescans 205 Total receipts $9,518 SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICERS Felony arrests 0 Misdemeanor arrests 10 Reports 20 Youth counseled 145 Meetings 48 Item No. 16 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Patrick A. Thomas, Director of Public Works / City Engineer DATE: March 27, 2018 SUBJECT: Public Works Department Monthly Report RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file the Public Works Department Monthly Report for Capital Improvement Projects, Maintenance Projects, and Land Development Projects. This report may also be viewed on the City's website at: http://temeculaca.gov/270/Capital-Improvement-Projects-CIP City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT March 27, 2018 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS CIRCULATION PROJECTS Butterfield Stage Road Extension Phase III, PW15-11 Description: Widening of Butterfield Stage Road from La Serena Way to Rancho California Road, which includes widening of Rancho California Road to four lanes through the intersection of Butterfield Stage Road (Riverside County is a partner on this major circulation project) Cost: $6,253,500 Status: Anticipate bidding this project for construction in spring 2018 French Valley Parkway / Interstate 15 Improvements- Phase II, PW16-01 Description: Design and construction of the two lane northbound collector/distributer road system beginning north of the Winchester Road interchange on -ramps and ending just north of the Interstate 15/Interstate 215 junction with connection to Interstate 15 and Interstate 215 Cost: $84,704,401 Status: Currently in design. Work has begun on the environmental re-evaluation. Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) has recommended reprogramming of State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) Funds. The City has applied for the Nationally Significant Freight and Highway Projects (INFRA) Federal Grant Fiscal Year 2017 Interstate -15 / State Route 79 South Ultimate Interchange, PW04-08 Description Construction of ramp system that will improve access to Interstate 15 from Temecula Parkway / State Route 79 South Cost: $50,646,479 Status: Construction is ongoing. More detail can be found on the project website: www.1579South.info City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT March 27, 2018 CIRCULATION PROJECTS (Continued) Murrieta Creek Bridge at Overland Drive, PW16-05 Description: Design and construction of a new bridge crossing over Murrieta Creek between Rancho California Road and Winchester Road Cost: $11,784,550 Status: The City applied and was approved to receive Federal Highway Bridge Program (HBP) funds. Request for Authorization of Preliminary Engineering to be submitted to Caltrans in March 2018 Overland Drive Extension (Commerce Center Drive to West of Enterprise Circle), PW16-06 Description: Construction of the extension of Overland Drive from Commerce Center Drive to Enterprise Circle West Cost: $8,423,347 Status: Construction began November 13, 2017 and is scheduled to be completed in early summer 2018 Pavement Rehabilitation Program — Pavement Management Program Update, PW17-02 Description: Review of all public roadways within the City, evaluating and updating existing Pavement Management Program software Cost: $275,000 Status: On June 13, 2017, City Council approved an Agreement with IMS Infrastructure Management Services, LLC. Evaluation of City streets and compilation of data are ongoing. Preliminary evaluation report was submitted to the City in January 2018. IMS is scheduled to present their findings to the City on March 5, 2018. IMS is currently finalizing the report City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT March 27, 2018 CIRCULATION PROJECTS (Continued) Pavement Rehabilitation Program — Rancho California Road (Jefferson Avenue to Westerly City Limits), PW17-26 Description: Rehabilitation of Rancho California Road from Jefferson Avenue to westerly City Limits Cost: To be determined Status: Final Specification/Contract Documents have been completed.. Anticipate bidding this project in March 2018 Pavement Rehabilitation Program — Winchester Road (Jefferson Avenue to Ynez Road), PW10-13 Description: Rehabilitation of Winchester Road from Jefferson Avenue to Ynez Road Cost: Status: $1,529,975 Construction began in January 2018 and is scheduled to be completed in April 2018 Pavement Rehabilitation Program — Ynez Road (Winchester to Date), Equity Drive and County Center Drive Loop, and Winchester Road (Nicolas to Easterly City Limits) PW18-01 Description: Rehabilitation of Ynez Road from Winchester Road to Date Street, Equity Drive and County Center Drive loop, and Winchester Road from Nicolas Road to easterly City Limits Cost: To be determined Status: Currently in design Pechanga Parkway Widening, PW15-14 Description: Widening of Pechanga Parkway between Via Gilberto and North Casino Drive Cost: $5,000,000 Status: Anticipate bidding this project in spring 2018 City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT March 27, 2018 INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Transition Plan Upgrade, PW16-03 Description: Cost: Status: This project will update the American with Disabilities Act (ADA) Transition Plan adopted by the City Council on September 12, 1995. Public facilities, programs, and right of ways will be evaluated $327,570 The consultant, Owen Group, Inc., prepared a comprehensive accessibility compliance evaluation of all City facilities (i.e., rights of way and buildings), as well as all City programs (services, activities, employment practices and communications impacted by ADA regulations). The draft report has been submitted to the City and it is under staff review Citywide Streetlight Acquisition and Light Emitting Diode (LED) Retrofit, PW17-18 Description: Cost: Status: Phase I of this project is to purchase the Southern California Edison (SCE) owned streetlights within the City's boundary, including the light poles, mast arms, and light fixtures. Phase II of this project includes retrofitting the purchased lights with a Light Emitting Diode (LED) lighting system $8,172,144 Agreements with SCE have been executed and the Application for Filing with the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) is in progress. CPUC approval is anticipated in early 2018 Interstate PW17-19 Description: Cost: Status: 15 Branding and Visioning — Conceptual Landscape Corridor Plan, Landscape beautification of the Interstate 15 corridor between French Valley Parkway and Temecula Parkway, including each interchange, in association with Visit Temecula Valley $100,000 Initiating planning and design City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT March 27, 2018 INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS (Continued) Library Parking — Phase II, PW13-09 Description: Design and construction of an expansion of the current on-site parking facility Cost: $2,908,924 Status: Design is ongoing. Anticipate bidding this project in spring 2018 Main Street Property Improvements, PW17-20 Description: Site improvements on parcels adjacent to the Temecula Community Theater and Pennypickle's Workshop to include general plumbing and electrical relocations and repairs, installation of landscaping and various hardscape components Cost: $200,000 Status: Phase 1 of construction is complete Margarita Recreation Center, PW17-21 Description: Construction of a new recreation center in Margarita Community Park in place of the former YMCA building. Includes demolition of the existing building and pool, and construction of a new building, as determined by a feasibility study. Phase II includes the design and construction of an expansion of the current on-site parking facility Cost: $4,882,963 Status: Staff to develop RFP for conceptual design and bridging documents Old Town Parking Structure, PW17-15 Description: Design and eventual construction of a new parking facility in Old Town. The Old Town Parking Management Plan outlines a number of parking strategies that can be implemented in Old Town over time Cost: $1,000,000 Status: Parking study is being updated City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT March 27, 2018 INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS (Continued) Santa Gertrudis Creek Pedestrian/Bicycle Trail Extension and Interconnect, PW08-04 Description: Design, environmental document, and construction of the extension of the existing trail from Ynez Road to the Murrieta Creek Trail. The extension includes access and under -crossing at Ynez Road, Interstate 15 and Jefferson Avenue and a continuous paved trail along Santa Gertrudis Creek to connect to Murrieta Creek trail Cost: $4,891,353 Status: Design is being finalized and the environmental document has been initiated. The California Transportation Commission (CTC) has approved $3,759,000 State SB1 Alternative Transportation Program (ATP) Augmentation funds for this project Sidewalks — Citywide (Third Street), PW17-24 Description: Curb and sidewalk improvements on the north side of Third Street, between Old Town Front Street and Mercedes Street and the west side of Mercedes Street from Third Street for approximately 150' to the north. Portion adjacent to the proposed parking structure for the hotel will be completed by private developer Cost: To be determined Status: Initiating design Sidewalks — Old Town Boardwalk Enhancement, PW17-23 Description: Replace boardwalk plank boards with colored concrete sidewalk Cost: $700,000 Status: At the 12/12/2017 meeting, the City Council approved the plans and specifications and authorized staff to bid the project for construction. Anticipate bidding this project for construction in winter 2018 City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT March 27, 2018 INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS (Continued) Sidewalks - Old Town Improvement Project, PW17-04 Description: This project is on the east side of Mercedes Street from Sam Hicks Park to Fourth Street. This project will provide walking surfaces for pedestrians Cost: $330,520 Status: Construction contract was awarded at the March 13, 2018 City Council Meeting Sidewalks - Sixth Street Improvements, PW17-05 Description: This project includes adding new sidewalks on the north side of Sixth Street between Mercedes Street and Mary Phillips Senior Cost: $160,557 Status: Construction contract was awarded at the March 13, 2018 City Council Meeting Sidewalks — Ynez Road, PW17-22 Description: New sidewalks on the east side of Ynez Road between Winchester Road and County Center Drive Cost: $137,537 Status: Construction contract was awarded at the March 13, 2018 City Council Meeting City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT March 27, 2018 INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS (Continued) Sidewalks — Citywide (Ridge Park West), PW17-27 Description: Cost: Status: New sidewalks on the west side of Ridge Park from Ridgegate to 1065' south of the curb return) $44,000 City Council approved the construction contract at the January 23, 2018 meeting. The project is currently under construction. Construction completion is anticipated by the end of March 2018 Sidewalks — Citywide (Ynez, Rancho Highland to Tierra Vista), PW17-28 Description: New sidewalks on the west side of Ynez from Rancho Highlands to Tierra Vista Cost: $198,920.00 Status: Project currently in design. Staff is currently working on resolving various utility conflicts. Design completion anticipated in June 2018 Temecula Park and Ride, PW06-09 Description: Cost: Status: Design and construction of a park and ride facility in the vicinity of Temecula Parkway and La Paz Street $2,764,093 City Council awarded the construction contract at the 01/09/2018 meeting. The project is currently under construction. Completion is scheduled for summer 2018 Teen Village, PW17-23 Description: Cost: Status: Design and construct 6,820 square foot central building at the Community Recreation Center in Ronald Reagan Sports Park $8,667,930 Initiating planning and design City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT March 27, 2018 PARKS AND RECREATION PROJECTS (Continued) Community Recreation Center (CRC) Pool Site Enhancements and Renovations, PW18-02 Description: Removal and replacement of pool decking, pool re -plaster, and installation of an enhanced lighting system with energy efficient LED fixtures Cost: $410,000 Status: Initiating planning and design Fallen Heroes Memorial, PW17-07 Description: Construct a memorial to the fallen heroes of our community representing all service branches of the military. The memorial will be located at the Temecula Duck Pond park site adjacent to the Veteran's Memorial and paver walkway Cost: $150,000 Status: On March 13, 2018, City Council awarded a construction contract to Aramexx Group, Inc. Construction is anticipated to begin in April 2018 Flood Control Channel Reconstruction and Repair, PW11-10 Description: This project repairs and reinforces the earth and berms between Pala Park and Temecula Creek and fortifies the banks to prevent further erosion into the park site Cost: $1,280,284 Status: Design is complete. Preparation of the environmental document is underway Public Restroom Renovations, PW17-06 Description: Renovation of various park site restroom facilities, including Ronald Reagan Skate Park, Patricia H. Birdsall Sports Park, Paloma Del Sol Park, Temeku Hills Park, and Harveston Lake Park Cost: $347,800 Status: Initiating planning and design City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT March 27, 2018 PARKS AND RECREATION PROJECTS (Continued) Ronald Reagan Sports Park Restroom Expansion and Renovation, PW18-03 Description: Design and construction of the restroom building expansion, including adding stalls and urinals. It also include renovating the snack bar, enlarging the storage case; and the renovation of the north/south baseball restroom and snack bar building by installing a new roof, cabinets, fixtures, and other building improvements Cost: $725,000 Status: Initiating planning and design Sam Hicks Monument Park Playground Enhancement, PW12-20 Description: Design and construct a new innovative play area to replace the existing equipment Cost: $648,888 Status: Currently on hold City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT March 27, 2018 LAND DEVELOPMENT OVERSIGHT PROJECTS Diaz Road and Dendy Parkway Description: Rancho California Water District (RCWD) / Dendy Distribution Center Status: Work to include water line tie-ins. Anticipate completion in March 2018 Old Town (Third Street between Mercedes Street and Old Town Front Street) Description: Truax Hotel Status: Work by a private contractor for demolition of existing structures and construction of the Truax Hotel. Flagging for traffic and pedestrians. Work hours are 7:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Anticipate completion in March 2020 Temecula Parkway and La Paz Street Description: Gateway to Temecula Status: Work by a private contractor. Work hours are 9:00 a.m. to 2:00 restrictions. Anticipate completion in March 2018 p.m. Intermittent west bound lane Vallejo Avenue (La Paz Street to approximately Cabo Street) Description: Private Contractor (HOA) Status: Intermittent single lane closures for installation of horse trail on south side of Vallejo Avenue. Work hours are 7:00 p.m. to 5:00 a.m. Anticipate completion in March 2018 City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT March 27, 2018 MAINTENANCE PROJECTS Expanded Recycled Water and Plant Material Conversion Project Description: City of Temecula was awarded grant funding through the California Department of Water Resources and Rancho California Water District for the design and construction of recycled water systems. Project consists of converting potable water landscape systems to recycled water systems. Landscape sites include Temeku Hills Development, Winchester Creek Development, Presley Development, and Crowne Hill Development Cost: $426,028.99 Status: In process of developing Request for Proposal (RFP). Anticipate design to begin in early summer 2018 Homeless Encampment Cleanup Services Description: Provide turnkey homeless encampment site cleanup within the City limits with the goal to keep waterways, parks, and public space free of encampments to protect the environment and provide safe use of public areas Cost: $100,000 Status: Multiple abandoned homeless encampments throughout the City have been cleared in recent weeks Margarita Park Splash Pad Landscape Improvements (Parks Improvement Program) Description: Install shade structures and improve landscape area surrounding Splash Pad to provide space that is more useful for park patrons Cost: $50,000 - $75,000 Status: Project is currently under construction and anticipated to be complete end of March 2018 City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT March 27, 2018 MAINTENANCE PROJECTS (Continued) Parks Non -Functional Turf Grass Replacement Project Description: Convert approximately 110,000 square feet of non-functional turf grass to a drought tolerant California friendly landscape. Sites include Veterans Park, Temecula Duck Pond Park, Meadows Park and Patricia H. Birdsall Sports Park Cost: $150,000 Status: Applications for turf conversion grant has been submitted to Rancho California Water District (RCWD) for $1.00 per square foot to cover costs. RCWD issued Notice of Proceed for the Temecula Duck Pond Park, Meadows Park, and Patricia H. Birdsall Sports Park. Veterans Park and Meadows Park conversation project are completed. Anticipate project completion July 2018 Playground Equipment Enhancement and Safety Surfacing Description: Replace aging playground structures and associated safety surfacing (Nicolas Park, Butterfield Stage Park, Vail Ranch Park, Veterans Park, Sunset Park). Cost: $1,380,000 Status: Butterfield Stage Park, Nicolas Road Park and Vail Ranch Park are completed. Sunset Park currently under construction and scheduled to be completed April 2018. Veterans Park scheduled to begin construction in May 2018 Sports Field Lighting Light Emitting Diode (LED) Conversion Description: This project provides for the replacement of the aging sports field metal halide lighting components with new LED lighting technology at various sports parks. The parks may include Paloma Del Sol, Pala Park, and Ronald Reagan Sports Park Cost: $250,000 Status: Currently pursuing a cooperative contract purchase and install agreement through National Joint Powers Alliance (NJPA). This project is estimated to be complete by end of June 2018 City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT March 27, 2018 MAINTENANCE PROJECTS (Continued) Ronald H. Roberts Temecula Public Library Description: Replacement of 23 Low-pressure sodium parking lot fixtures to a more efficient 100 Watt 3000 Kelvin fixture Cost: $12,000 Status: Materials have been ordered. Once received city maintenance staff will install fixtures. This project is estimated to begin in June 2018 REQUESTS TO SPEAK I wish to speak on: ublic Commen Subject: REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY OF TEMECULA Date: Circle One: CITY COUNCIL / CSD / SARDA / THA / TPFA nAgenda Item No. For n Against Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record. Name: //2/S Address: Phone Numbef: ,, Email address: / If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY OF TEMECULA Date: wish toak on: Public Comment Circle One: CITY COUNCIL / CSD / SARDA / THA / TPFA Subject: 5 /9 di c j %- A '7 ( ( 1 \/ nAgenda Item No. For n Against 0 Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record. ' �/ `- If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional.