Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTract Map 16178 Rough Grading Soils Report Soil Tech �-- Laboi atories SOIL EN -7Ir EE:7I! iG — INSPECTION AND TESTING I I Dec. 13, 1984 Rancac Ccrs,,:1_ rts 23636 Front St -e°L Teneca a, C? i :390 (714)676-5/36 GeRtle*ren REgardinc: ==act_cn Test Results / Grading Rexrt L nCneSte' CQILU. Cant=- - Tract 16178-j ,-2 &-3 le=CavdtioR ?!'25= - __C3ec-_ :IUSL`er: 1076-::--34 ..3 ;its DES: -_CL_Cn S]tE isicc._. west o� jd__rSCR -4-e_.L'e, 1n ?=S C 4_r..rr,ia area, Riverside CCur=. Tc=rar-nv across tae site 7 tit, WJl=. a 5.:..._ace =c.:.enL the West. at -ss .Sc 7 oer=ant. The as'_ncre cau'-t zcne CLsac i:Scucn t`:e A—sta' cr. of to orccer-%, nding in a nert.,, scuta. C_'seK lies diractly tr. are :Jest. 2.3 ?rcccsr 2.1 The c z c ::sed ceve_cmenL is r=cresenty' to be a Licht indus,: cusiness centar, 3 .0 Sccce ci ricrac 3 .1 The ai:-_ c`ed & 1_ rear =e^.t the r-sui` of dens:.-.: =ts taker.. !:v a r=_cr:se^.tative of `=,is 2i= at the 1cca-_.c: s Lndlcat en the cn Test Re crt Stet_= Plan, I Ranchc CCn:iL.. tantz Winchester C: Tm. Centar Project N sii< Z:1076--+:--84 Page 2 3.2 Tte c iinc creration was performed b� the Blaciccnra C=m—v, trcL.c[ to use of t•Lree D8 trac'c-zmurtsd dozers w/ cne s,'reecsfcet czc inc dr-ILn, tri 621C scrapers, cne 988 loader-, one Backhoe, cne Ci-- =_cr-curt- dozer, and tao water trudks. 3.3 Delata: ;cus and crcanic cmta_-ial was r_-reved and buried within the ncr.-_ ;uth trending fault zone of the site. The fault zone was cCnsid= :- an approved waste are= as no st;-,Lctures are ailcwed within 'fault hazard" ar=_as . whfere feasible, subsoils tc receive fill w= :e scarified a minimum, Cf 6 inches below the eecos- surfac=_ , mCis .:re ocnditioned and rec==acted to a minimUM cf 90 percen: of t.e relative ma:c .•num density petantiai, i.^. accordance with Ri ez—'de Counter Standard 457 . Fell materia'_ was " oiaced wi thi^ _e cre^_ats areas . 3.4 The cn:: ._nc cceraticn cCnsist of over-=xC_vat'cn of the CCL=^.=_. ._ bL'_1C' ^C Cad areas C= the SCn leCt site tC a T2:C:.'SlLZil Ce _ _fir • Wthera cvcr=`{nava _ =' _CR was RCL pC5slnie Cue S.:r=a::'. Sas:=atl Cn, a mL:11mum cf 6 1r.Cnes was SCr._ .... :.c :.mrcrt cL =_,_ . �aC'.;r3L� SC1'_S L.^: to used f 4 1 l ".J2'_"E ? nEr --r:CCSCc.= Wit- =_r Tn tar:.a_� Cr ,`cwe'd - i_„r tc ci:ac mE.t. The northwest _ -tion cf to site was excavat—=-� cunc at crag, --: s -rata--4a'_ was use' fill _ r Yaaes cf to site a= a pr=elude = -- i= chase. t water CnCcI:Rt?�_-"... :C c,--ns t:�CL:.cn was a_i . t-- tc ev.; enc d sdrar_e etcrE=_ . These _amc^es Her=_ -- ec ars cz- aci_ cc r=et Cn y ;_ the suhdran s"st m ce sutm�tt� uxr. `1�1e_icR l to ?�cr-a_ prase i orad nc. -.e ccerat_ch, a s b facE nac= s•star: , a _Rs`zc wi cn^ l ^' _ �Re parai el, and s v ::es pe__erC. __'_- t.e fa m ult zcn e. These lines drain into the P^u =ie.•: Creek Channel. T` _ s•st�n was rst uct� - _^t=--e^t and (L _ _ _ urde.-_-Ce water ` _, and e acE, (See Site =L=n =wr details) . 3 .6 ie -_ r .Cn t=est- w- ^ acccr' - i+ �_ /^_ ^y GC: ::or_:lE''._ IR dander N� ' Latcratcr_r _ r=cLCrs" (i�_ax-iML'^.l CG._' t' _.. Mclst-.._ 'C:ntJenz �3 = G- _ CL'.._':L•.'1 3� LLenship-) , were per_crned in acccrda.r_ce with ?c * - A mor_ detail__ "._cur:-- ct c--Tr-ac—c- test =sz and c i ' f____ Cceraticr. to fCu cn t^.e cL_ _ =-=_e Soil Tech U."bcratories Rancho Const: ants Winchester Co m. Center Project N=T , :1076--C--84 Page 3 4.0 Ccnclu:si( ns 4.1 7aboratt; ry and field testing results indicate relative densities greatE_ than 90 percent within the fill portion of the subject site. 77 e grading operations have been perforated in accordance with ac: epted engineering pri.cioals and practices. The finding_; E mrassed in this report are based on field and laboratory testing peri'ch pored during the ccasacticn eperatiens and no �,arranty is emressed c• . rolied ever items beyond the direr` representations in this report. Thank you fc;r the cppertunity to provide this report, Please dire- any cues-icns tc) t ahs office. Resrec`,f;i '�, , r n� ,PI) John H. Wayne Bainbridge Rte:. 2.3464 Cc Brat cns imanacer Soil Tech Laboratories Rancho Ccnsuli ants Winchester Ccr n. Center Project Nurix. :1076-C-84 Page 4 ES"aLBIT I (WERE{ PHASE) SUDI.%RY c' bUISMME DENSITY REI.ASICNSEIPS ASTM-D-1557-70 Sa=le Ntanber _ 82=1e Description MaX== Density Ccti= phi stares 8 1. Z a '1, c:-,arse to uedi sn sand ui trace fines. (SP) 122.7 10 .8 2. Z. :, fine to aecium sares w trace curse grains. (SW) 108 .5 12.7 6. Elick, fine to ccarse sands wi --'- si ::. (CL) 120 .0 12.0 8. '1= ., fine to crarse sand wi _Z silt. (SM) 126 .5 10 .7 9. D= ::c brcwn, fine to medi an s= ids wit_`: silt. (MM) 115 .2 13 .6 10 . li :ham tar., ye--,, fine tp c--arse s= .ds with sil_. (ML) 126 .0 10 .1 Soil Tech Laboratories Rancho Consultant.,; Winchester Ccm. Cii te_r Project Numb---:10"E- C-84 Page 5 E.'{HIE4IT II (Cv EP Y PHASE) SJI4ARY CF FIr"L, ,D DENSITY TEST RE.a'= AMID-1556-70 Centt`i mcistuxe Dr7 Relative Test Test L=aticr. (cr) Crntent Density % 'Ma--i.nL-m Soil Re- No. _ Elevaticn 3 P.C.F. Ccu=--=cn Censity True %- 1. Ph 3 lot 7 SE Native Grnd 11.3 97 .3 76.1 120 .0 6 - 2. PH 3 lot 7 SE Native Grnd 18 .8 101.4 84.5 120 .0 6 3 . PH 3 lot 7 SL 1 Feet 12.5 102.2 80 .8 125 .5 8 90 4. PH 3 1ct 7 ,SE + 1 Feet 20 .0 106 .6 84.3 126.5 8 90 PH 3 lot 7 SE + 1 Feet 20 .0 102.2 80 .8 126 .5 8 90 6. PH 3 lot 7 SW + 1 Feet 16.9 108 .3 85 .6 125 .5 8 90 7 . Retest 43 + 1 Feet 9.9 109.9 91.6 120 0 6 90 8 . Retest 44 - 1 Feet 15.0 120 .0 91.6 125 .5 8 90 9 Retest 45 + 1 Feet 11.0 116.5 94 .9 1-6 .:z 8 90 10 . Retest 46 + 1 Feet 9.5 114.3 92 1 126 .5 8 90 FH 3 lct 7 S Finish Grace 1C .0 115 .5 92.1 126.5 8 90 12 . 77H 3 lot 7 SW + 3 Feet 12.2 110 .6 92.2 120 .0 6 90 _ a 3 1ct i S + 2 Zee 13 .1 108 .1 92.1 12C .0 6 90 14_ PH 3 lot 7 W Finish Grace 15 .1 1-10 .2 9 1 120 .J 6 90 3 lot 7 NE + 2 Feet 12.0 109 .4 91.2 17 6 �G 15 . PH 3 1ct 8 W Native Grnd 18 .0 95 .1 79 .3 120 .0 6 17 . PH 3 lot 7 SE Finish Grade 10 .6 109.8 91.5 120 .J 6 9G 18 . Retest 416 + 2 Feet 10 .2 116 .6 92.1 125.5 8 90 L°. PH 3 lot 8 NE + 2 Feet 13 .1 110 .3 91.9 120 .0 6 9C 20 . PH 3 1ct 8 S4 Finis:. Grade 10 .9 170 .8 92.3 110 .0 6 90 11 PH 3 lot 8 S + 2 Feet i .0 108 .2 90 .2 120 .0 6 90 22 . PH 3 lct 8 SW Finish Grace 12.1 116 .1 91.8 125 .5 8 9C 3 _ct 8 SE F-nisi Grade 8.0 108 .3 90 .2 C .0 6 9C 24. FH 3 lot 8 E Finish Grade 15 .3 11 9 91 1 7 i 90 2 5 H 3 _ct 7 NW + 2 Feet 15 .2 1-13 .8 94.8 120 .0 6 90 25 . PH 3 lct 6 S + 2 Feet 15 .0 ll1.6 93 .0 120 .0 6 90 ^Q . Pi 3 1ct 6 SW + 2 Feet 12.3 109.2 91.0 120 .0 6 90 -Ct o N4 - 13 .0 11_.1 9^.6 120 .0 6 cC 3 _Ct 6 NE - 2 Feet 14.5 109.1 00 .9 0 0 30 . : 3 1ct 5 \W _ _-- 9.1 109 .1 r ' 6 9C 9C .1 1� .0 6 9C Soil Tech Laboratories Rancho C:nsuttant-c Winchester Comm. (:Er =e-- Project Nimter:10 E• :-84 Page 6 EYSiTBIT II SJRM-A Y CF FIELD DENSIT`_' TEST RESULTS ASTM-D-1556-70 Depth Moisture Dr✓ Relative Test Test Lccatie:i (or) Content Density % Ma.-cimiun Soil Reg . No. - Elevation 8 P.C.F. Cc=c -' en Density Tvice 3 31 . PH 3 lot 5 NE + 2 Feet 10 .0 108 .4 90 .3 120 .0 6 90 3Z. PH 3 lot 5 SE + 2 Feet 11.0 109 .3 91.1 120 .0 6 90 33 , PH 3 lot 5 S 1 + 2 FGet 9.8 109.5 91.2 120 .0 6 90 34 . PH 3 lot 6 SE + 2 Feet 8 .2 108 .4 90 .3 120 .0 6 90 35 , PH 3 lot 6 S F--ism Grade 10 .E 109.8 91.5 120 .0 6 90 36 . PH 3 Lot 1 Ng + 3 Feet 10 ..8 ll1 .4 90 .8 122.7 1 90 37 . PH 3 lot 1 NE + 3 Feet 1i.1 111.1 90.3 122.7 1 90 38 . PH 3 1ct 2 N r7 + 2 Feet 13 ,1 L-11.4 90 .9 132.7 1 90 39 PH 3 1ct 2 Ne; + 4 Feet L.2 712.4 91.6 122.7 1 90 40 . PH 3 lot 2 No7 + 2 Feet 14.3 L12.9 92.0 122.7 1 90 41. PI- 3 lot 2 NE + 2 Feet L' .8 i'-.S 90 .9 122.7 1 9G 4Z. PH 3 1ct 2 NE + 4 Fpet 12.1 "_i° 91.1 _22.7 1 90 42 . PH 3 lot 2 EE + 2 Feet 13 .1 113 .0 92.1 122J _ 9C 44 . PH 3 lct 2 .c;q + 2 Feet 10 .2 109.6 90 .i 122.7 _ 90 45 . PH 3 lot Z EE + 4 Feet1'-.6 L.5 90 .9 ___ .7 1 90 46 . PH 3 lot Z E'N + 2 Feet 12.6 L3 .0 9Z.1 12_ .7 _ 90 47PH 3 lot 1 :`c + 2 Feet 14.6 112.9 92.0 132.7 7 9G 48 . PH 3 lot 1 :vs + 2 Feet 14.9 L5 .5 94.1 122.7 1 90 49. PH 3 lot 1 EE + 4 Feet 11.') 1-13 .7 92.7 122.7 1 9G 50 . PH 3 lot 4 NF + 2 Feet 10 .2 1L.6 90 .9 122.7 1 90 H 3 1ct 4 ZEE + 2 Feet 11.1 L1.8 91.1 122.7 1 90 52 PH 3 '_ct 3 :R+ + 2 Feet 10 .2 L2.5 91.7 S7 H 3 lot 3 Vi + 2 Feet 14.5 115 .6 - 94.2 __J - °G 54 . PH 3 Lct 3 NV Finish Grade 10 .0 11_0 .6 90 .1 722.7 1 9G PH 3 lot 3 ;: + 2 Feet 12.5 L3 .3 92.3 1_2.7 1 90 So . PR 3 1ct 2 iI ^ee-_ 13 .1 L4.1 93 .0 122 .7 1 9G _. - � _ S . lct 2 3V + zc- >.7 _12.4 91.6 122. 1 90 58 , PH . lot 3 I. Fi=i s:. Grade 10 .4 Li. 90 .7 1-2 .7 1 9G 1c7 3 N + 2 Feet _= .3 .'_,.0 91.9 1__ .7 _ 90 3 lc-- 3 _ 16 .0 70 .8 9O .-� 123.7 1 90 14.0 _13 .G 92.1 72_.7 _ 9C 6_ . 3 4 3i F-___,. Grade 13 .3 '_12.6 91.3 722.7 _ 90 Soil Tech Laboratories Ranc.^n �'•ll= Consul,�tan C:; Winc..7este.- \.. . (: _rater Project NLzrre_-:1)" -C-84 Pace 7 EffiI3IT II SUMCF FI= DENSITY TEST RESULTS AS'ZI D-1556-70 Decal Moisture Dr7 Relative Test Test Location (or) Content Density No . .o, r; % T�-`�-'t� Soil Reg. - Ey-n,_cn 3 P.C.F. Ccncac= on Den sibI Tie 3 63 . 2 lot 4 SE + 2 Feet 12.3 108 .0 90 .0 120 .0 6 90 64. PI- 2 lot 4 SN + 2 Feer 13 .0 108 .2 90 .2 120 .0 6 c 55 . P 2 lot 4 W 2 Feet 10 .0 108 .8 90 .7 0 56. 1ct 4 'A - , =m- 120 .0 6 ap b, . t lot c N? ��t 13.E 108 .5 90 .4 120 .0 5 op 2 12.7 109.3 91.1 120 .0 6 90 68 . 2 1ct 4 N,; - 2 Feet 11 69. oc 2 1CL 4 N3 _ _ -mt t 108 .4 90.3 120 .0 6 90 12.0 108 .8 90 .7 0 70 . Pc 2 lot 4 E + m- 120 .0 6 0 2 F--- 13 .0 109.6 91.3 120 .0 6 90 PH 2 lct 4 E + 2 Feet 10 .0 72- P 2 1ct 4 S;? + 2 Feet 1?.3 109.9 Q0.0 120 .0 6 90 73 . ict ; + 2 Fm+ 9 a 3 -1-- 120 .0 6 90 74. =H 2 lot _ d - :mt 3 0' • 90.9 _20 .0 6 90 2 9.0 108 . 90 .4 7r cc 2 -ct W - 2 =mt 11 .0 109. 91.0 20 .0 6 a0 ot Mi 2 Feet 1 75. cc 2 1ct 6 Si -- Feet 1?.4 108 ./ -1.4 120 .0 6 9a 78 . P5 2 ict 5 S + =mt 1 0 .4 120 .0 5 cp 12.4 108 .8 90 .7 120 .0 6 90 79. '3 2 lot 5 �; eer 6 80 . r2 1ct 5 NE: + 2 Feet 10 .9 109 . 91.3 120 .0 6 90 L 8l . PH 2 lot 5 E + 2 Fm. '7 103 .6 90 .0 115 .2 9 90 12.3 103 .7 90 .1 115 .2 9 0 82. 2 lot 3 .ac: + 2 Feet 4 0 83 . 2 lct 5 E Finisn Grace 8 .0 104: _ 900.6 L1y :2 9 90 103 .9 84 . P5 0 1ct 8 NSA' + 3 Feet 10.0 103 .9 a 9 _0 95 . Pz 0 lot 3 �r - 0 -- L5 .2 9 cp + 3 Feet 12.3 3.1 92.2 122 86 . PE 0 1ct 7 S'c - 3 7eet I - p �� 3 0 7 1 90 87 . P5 0 lot 7 2 m- .5 12_. 1 1 c7 Feet 13 .0 108 .4 90 .3 120 .0 6 ap ea . =E 0 lot 6 S'c - 3 =eet 9.Z 'i 4.7 93 .5 123.7 1 90 89. ^. 0 1ct 5 - -mt 10 . ^ 9i. '� 0 lot Ict / vz - :eer 8 .0 1'1.3 91.3 = . i o0 0 lot 7 + -�+ 14.2 87 .1 72.5 ?0 .0 6 90 z Il8 92 .0 9 _ 2 lot 7 MY - 2 12.6 7 l op Soil Tech Laboratories I Rancho Ccnsul`.ant� Winchester Calm. C:ec ter Pro]ectt Nimice_-:10; 6- 2-84 Pre 8 F-=IT II SUb"ARV CF FIELD DENSITY TEST RES-= AS74-D-1556-70 De^th Moisture Drr Relative Test Test Lccaticn (or) Content Density % Maxi= Soil Rec. No. _ Elevation $ P.C.F. Ccnmact'on Density Tvte $ 94 Retest 4 91 + 3 Feet 12.0 104.4 90 .4 L'S .2 9 90 95 . PH 2 lot 7 NW + 3 Feet i2.5 13 .2 92.3 122.7 1 90 96. PH 2 lot 6 NE + 3 Feet 14.1 L3 .6 92.6 122.7 1 9C 97 PH 0 lot 6 SE + 3 Feet 13 .0 13 .9 92.9 122.7 1 aC 98 . PH 0 lot 3 SW Native Gond 13.1 104.2 85.0 122.7 1 99 PH 2 lot 6 N + 3 Feet 14.6 104.7 90 .7 L'5 .2 a ap 100 . PH 2 lot 6 NW + 2 Feet 12.6 1' 2.6 91.6 122 7 1 90 101. PH 0 1oL 7 SW + 3 Feet 11.6 108 .8 90 .7 120 .0 6 90 102. PH 0 lot 3 SW + 4 Feet 9.0 713 .9 94.3 122.7 1 9C 103 . Pg 0 lot 3 W + 4 Feet 8.6 ' X4.9 93.7 122.7 ' 90 104. PH 0 lot 3 NW + 3 eet 12.2 "2.5 91.7 1 1 9C LIE . Ph 0 lct 3 NE + 2 Feel " 9 114.2 93.1 1 op 106 . = 0 lcz 2 NW + 3 Feer 12.1 112.0 91.3 12-2.7 1 9C 107 . Pu 0 lot 2 W + 3 Feet 15 .6 119.5 97 .4 122.7 1 9C 108 . PH 0 lot 3 NE + 2 Feet 8 .5 L2.3 91.5i,_2.7 1 9C 109 . PH 0 lot 3 SE + 2 Feet 9 .6 110 .6 90 .2 12_.7 1 90 LO PH 0 lot 3 SE F-.isa Grace 9.0 L1.5 90 .9 "^ - 1 9C Ll. PH 0 lot 4 SE + 3 Feet 13.1 116 .4 92.0 125 .5 8 9C �2 x 0 lot 4 SW + 3 Fee* 14.3 LS .5 91.3 126.5 8 9C L3 PH 0 1ct 4 S Finish Grade L.8 L14.9 90 .9 126.5 8 9C L4 . PH 0 lot 4 NW + 2 Feet 8.0 114.1 90 .2 126 .5 8 90 PH 0 lot 4 NW + 3 Feet 14.2 17-4.9 90 .9 126 .5 8 9C 116 . PH 0 lot 4 NW Finish Grade 12.1 L5 .5 91.3 126.5 8 9C ' 17 . PH 0 lot 4 NE + 2 Feet 11.8 124.3 90 .8 126.5 8 90 118 . PH 0 lot 4 NE Finish Grade 10 .1 16 .1 91.8 126.5 8 9C L9 PH C 1ct 6 W + 2 Feet 11.6 16 .8 92.3 126 .5 8 9C i20 . PH 2 lcL 6 Wee_ 12.0 L4.5 90 .5 126.5 8 90 PH 0 --CL 2 N Native Grnd 14.6 95 .6 82.9 L5 .2 9 - _ 0 ict 1 N Na--' ve Grnd 12.1 94.2 8'_.7 115 .2 9 - H 0 ict o NE + 3 Feet 15 ._ 1-4 .0 90 ._ 125 8 9C 93.7 125 . 8 90 --- , .0 116.2 91.9 _26 .0 8 90 Soil Tech Laboratories Rancho Ccnsultants Winchester C=. i_::' ter Project Ntut�-----:10 7G C-84 Page 9 F.=IT II SU1Pq,RY OF FL= MNSITY = REs-L 5 ASTM 7-1556-70 De--th Moisture Dry Relative Test Test Lccaticr (or) Content Density crML--i_= Soil Reg. No. - Flevaticn % P.C.F. Cracticn Dansit� T1re 3 126 . PH 0 lot 5 Nro + 2 Feet 12.0 112.8 91.9 122.7 1 90 127 . FH 0 lot 5 NLu + 2 Feet 16.6 Lo`.1 94.6 122.7 1 90 i28 . Pu 0 lot 5 NI Fi-iisn Grace 14.6 1-14.0 92,9 122.7 1 90 129 . PH 0 lot 5 M + 2 F.- 8.1 112.6 91.8 122.7 1 90 130 . PH 0 lot 5 Si + 3 Feet 9.0 113 .7 92.7 122.7 1 90 L'1. P_3 0 lot 5 5 2 Feet 12.8 1-7.5 .3 91.2 126 .5 8 90 l32 PH 0 lot 5 S'N + 3 Feet 15.8 120 .6 95 .4 126.5 8 90 133 F_? 0 lot 5 Nw + 2 Feet 9.4 L4.5 90 .5 126.5 8 90 134 . Pa 0 1C 5 NW + 2 Feet 8.7 L5 .4 91.3 125.5 8 90 5 .d 0 lot 3 NTA F_.isa Grace 14.1 116.4 92.0 126 .3 8 90 136 . PH 0 lot 8 N + 1 Fmt 10 .i 114.1 90 .1 126 ,5 8 90 13 1 0 1ct 8 ,m Nar_ve Grad 12.i 105 .9 88 .0 120 .0 6 138 . PS 0 1c7 8 S Nat've Grnd 8 .1 97 .5 81.3 120 .0 6 139 . Scuta liae ��t• F-;-ish Grade 1..0 108 .8 90 .7 l20 ,0 6 90 140 . Scutn line cantar• F raisin Grace 14.2 113 .6 92.6 122.7 90 141. Scutt !ne last. F_-ish Grade 17 .0 L'S .8 94.4 '_22.7 1 90 142. Mid, line F St. Finish Grace 9.0 109.3 9-" .i 120 .0 6 90 143 . Mid. line c<nt_. Fir_isa Grade 10 .5 108 .1 90 .1 i20 .0 6 90 144 . PH 2 lot 6 si Fi ; sh Grade 10 .0 92.3 80 .1 115.2 9 90 145 . PH 2 lot 6 SPI 3 Feet 9.7 83.8 72.7 y c 2 9 90 146 . Mid. N. _ine West. _ 2 imt 8 .5 109.2 91.0 12 0 .0 6 90 14- . Hid. N. "ne rant-. _ --'sh Grade 6.1 108 .2 90 .2 120 .0 6 90 Soil Tech Laboratories F