HomeMy WebLinkAbout062018 PC Agenda
AERIAL MAP
PLAN REDUCTIONS
PC DRAFT RESOLUTION
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 37368
PC RESOLUTION NO. 18-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. PA17-1219, A TENTATIVE TRACT
MAP (TTM 37368) FOR THE CREATION OF 26 PARCELS
ON 382.8 ACRES FOR RESIDENTIAL, PUBLIC
INSTITUTIONAL, PUBLIC PARK, PRIVATE RECREATION
CENTER, AND OPEN SPACE DEVELOPMENT FOR
RORIPAUGH RANCH PHASE II, AND MAKING A FINDING
OF EXEMPTION UNDER THE CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA)
Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of
Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that:
A. On August 8, 2017, Woodside Homes Southern California Division filed
Planning Application Nos. PA17-1219, a Tentative Tract Map (TTM 37368) for the
creation of 26 parcels on 382.8 acres for residential, public institutional, public park,
private recreation center, and open space development; and PA17-1220, a Tentative
Tract Map (TTM 37341) subdividing TTM 37368 into eighteen individual Tentative Tract
Maps totaling 220.8 acres and creating 939 single family lots and 50 non-residential lots
for Roripaugh Ranch Phase II in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General
Plan and Development Code.
B. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice,
in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law.
C. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application
and environmental review on June 20, 2018, at a duly noticed public hearing as
prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity
to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter.
D. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due
consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application
No. PA17-1219, subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder.
E. All legal preconditions to the adoption of the Resolution have occurred.
Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving the
Application hereby finds, determines and declares that:
Tentative Tract Map, Development Code Section 16.09.140
A. The proposed subdivision and the design and improvements of the
subdivision are consistent with the Development Code, General Plan, any applicable
specific plan, and the City of Temecula Municipal Code.
The maximum number of residential units allowed within the entire Roripaugh
Ranch Specific Plan is 2,015. With what is proposed as a part of these Tentative
Tract Maps plus what has been previously constructed as part of Phase I the total
number of residential units is 1,448, which is 567 units below what is allowed per
the Specific Plan. Therefore, the proposed subdivision and the design and
improvements of the subdivision are consistent with the Development Code,
General Plan, the City of Temecula Municipal Code, and the Roripaugh Ranch
Specific Plan.
B. The Tentative Map does not propose to divide land, which is the subject to
a contract entered into pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965, or the
land is subject to a Land Conservation Act contract but the resulting parcels following
division of the land will not be too small to sustain their agricultural use.
The proposed property has not been used as agricultural land and has never been
entered into any Williamson Act contracts.
C. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of
development proposed by the Tentative Map.
The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development
proposed by the Tentative Maps. The proposed Tentative Maps are in accordance
with what is allowed by the previously approved Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan
which allows for 2,015 residential units along with public institutional, public park,
private recreation center, and open space development.
D. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements, with
Conditions of Approval, are either:
1. Not likely to cause significant environmental damage or substantially and
avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat, or
2. An environmental impact report has been prepared and a finding has been
made, pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081(a)(3), finding that
specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible mitigation
measures or project alternatives identified in the environmental impact report.
An Environmental Impact Report and subsequent Addenda to the EIR have been
prepared for the project. The project is conditioned to comply with all mitigation
measures identified within EIR No. SCH# 97121030. Therefore, the design of the
subdivision and the proposed improvements, with Conditions of Approval, will not
likely cause significant environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure
fish or wildlife or their habitat.
E. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely
to cause serious public health problems.
The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause
serious public health problems because the proposed development is consistent
with all applicable building, development and fire codes, which include provisions
to safeguard public health, and will be further reviewed and inspected by City staff
for compliance with all applicable building, development and fire codes prior to
issuance of any grading, building, or occupancy permits.
F. The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating
or cooling opportunities in the subdivision to the extent feasible.
The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating or
cooling opportunities. The project has been designed to ensure that all setbacks
have been met and that light and air access is available to the extent possible. In
addition, the construction will be required to conform to all state energy efficiency
codes as well.
G. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict
with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property
within the proposed subdivision, or the design of the alternate easements which are
substantially equivalent to those previously acquired by the public will be provided.
The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements have been considered
in the design of the subdivision, and will not conflict with existing or future
easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property
within the proposed subdivision. All required easements and dedications are
required as Conditions of Approval.
H.
requirements (Quimby Act).
(Quimby Act) because payment of Quimby fees will be required prior to the
recordation of the final map.
Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes
the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval
of the Development Plan:
A. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed
project has been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review
(Section 15162, Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations);
1. The Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan was formally adopted in 2002. An
Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared and certified on
December 17, 2002 as part of this effort. Since that time, three Addendum
EIRs have been prepared for the project area with the most recent adopted
on January 23, 2018. The proposed project has been determined to be
consistent with the previously adopted Roripaugh Ranch Addendum EIR
and is exempt from further environmental review (Section 15162,
Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations). Staff has reviewed the EIR,
the First Addendum to the EIR adopted on April 23, 2013, the Second
Addendum to the EIR adopted on March 22, 2016, the Third Addendum to
the EIR adopted on January 23, 2018, and has determined that the
proposed project does not require the preparation of a subsequent
Environmental Impact Report or Mitigated Negative Declaration as none of
the conditions described in Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal.
Code Regs. 15162) exist. Specifically, there are no substantial changes
proposed by the proposed project that will require major revisions of the
previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental
effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified
significant effects; no substantial changes have occurred with respect to the
circumstances under which the proposed project are undertaken that will
require major revisions of the previous EIR due to the involvement of new
significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of
previously identified significant effects; and there is no new information of
substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been
known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous
EIR was adopted, showing that: (a) the proposed project will have one or
more significant effects not discussed in the EIR; (b) there are significant
effects previously examined that will be substantially more severe than
shown in the EIR; (c) there are mitigation measures or alternatives
previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would
substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the proposed project,
but the City declines to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or (d)
mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from
those analyzed in the EIR would substantially reduce one or more
significant effects on the environment, but the City declines to adopt the
mitigation measure or alternative. The proposed project meets all
requirements and mitigation contained in EIR and the Addenda to the EIR.
Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula
approves Planning Application No. PA17-1219, aTentative Tract Map (TTM 37368) for
the creation of 26 parcels on 382.8 acres for residential, public institutional, public park,
private recreation center, and open space development for Roripaugh Ranch Phase II,
and makes a finding of exemption under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA),
subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and
incorporated herein by this reference.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED
Section 5. by the City of Temecula
Planning Commission this 20thday of June,2018.
Gary Youmans, Chairperson
ATTEST:
Luke Watson
Secretary
\[SEAL\]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Luke Watson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify
that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 18- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 20th day of
June, 2018, by the following vote:
AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Luke Watson
Secretary
DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 37368
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF TEMECULA
DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No.:
PA17-1219
Project Description:
A Tentative Tract Map (TTM 37368) for the creation of 26 parcels on 382.8
acres for residential, public institutional, public park, private recreation center,
and open space development for Roripaugh Ranch Phase II
964-180-022
Assessor's Parcel No.:
964-180-037
964-180-004
964-180-018
964-180-031
964-180-024
964-180-033
964-180-025
964-180-029
964-180-008
964-180-017
964-180-034
964-180-026
964-180-036
964-180-021
964-180-030
964-180-007
964-180-027
964-180-028
964-180-020
964-180-005
964-180-019
964-180-023
N/A (fees through PA17-1220 & future Development Plan Applications)
MSHCP Category:
N/A (fees through PA17-1220 & future Development Plan Applications)
DIF Category:
TUMF Category:
N/A (fees through PA17-1220 & future Development Plan Applications)
Quimby Category:
N/A (fees through PA17-1220 & future Development Plan Applications)
N/A (fees through PA17-1220 & future Development Plan Applications)
New Street In-lieu of Fee:
Approval Date:
June 20, 2018
June 20, 2021
Expiration Date:
PLANNING DIVISION
Within 48 Hours of the Approval
1.Filing Notice of Exemption. The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Division a
cashiers check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Fifty Dollars
($50.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption as
provided under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations
Section 15062. If within said 48-hour period the applicant/ developer has not delivered to the
Planning Division the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be
void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Wildlife Code Section 711.4(c)).
General Requirements
2.Indemnification of the City. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this
condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City and its
attorneys from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City
to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any
action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof,
advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of
the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this
condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed
officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall
promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which
this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The
City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the
City and its citizens in regards to such defense.
3.Expiration. This approval shall be used within three years of the approval date; otherwise, it
shall become null and void. Use means the beginning of substantial construction contemplated
by this approval within the three year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion,
or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval, or use of a property in
conformance with a Conditional Use Permit.
4.Time Extension. The Director of Community Development may, upon an application being filed
prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to five extensions of time,
one year at a time.
5.
Consistency with Specific Plans. This project and all subsequent projects within this site shall
be consistent with the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan (SP #11).
6.Consistency with Development Agreements. The project and all subsequent projects within
this site shall be subject to Development Agreement No. 2016-0156276 recorded on April 20,
2016.
7.Compliance with EIR. The project and all subsequent projects within this site shall comply with
all mitigation measures identified within EIR No. SCH# 97121030.
8.Conformance with Approved Plans. The development of the premises shall substantially
conform to the approved site plan and elevations contained on file with the Planning Division.
9.Signage Permits. A separate building permit shall be required for all signage.
10.Burrowing Owl Study Submittal. A Burrowing Owl Study shall be submitted prior to plan check
approval for the grading permit. If construction is delayed or suspended for more than 30 days
after the survey, the area shall be resurveyed.
11. Modifications or Revisions. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or
revisions to the approval of this project.
12.Public Art Ordinance. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the City’s Public Art
Ordinance as defined in Chapter 5.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code.
Class I Multi-Use Trails. Class I multi-use trails shall be provided as per the City of Temecula
13.
Multi-Use Trails and Bikeways Master Plan. The construction plans for the Class 1 trails shall
be included on the perimeter landscape plans and constructed in concurrence with the
installation of the landscaping.
14.Block Wall Anti-Graffiti. All constructed block walls shall be finished with an anti-graffiti coating.
Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit
15.Placement of Transformer. Provide the Planning Division with a copy of the underground water
plans and electrical plans for verification of proper placement of transformer(s) and double
detector check valves prior to final agreement with the utility companies.
16.Archaeological/Cultural Resources Grading Note. The following shall be included in the Notes
Section of the Grading Plan: “If at any time during excavation/construction of the site,
archaeological/cultural resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to
be evidence of cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall
immediately advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other
disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease. The Director of Community
Development at his/her sole discretion may require the property owner to deposit a sum of
money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and/or authorize an
independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess
the significance of the find. Upon determining that the discovery is not an archaeological/
cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner of such determination
and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an
archaeological/cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner that no
further excavation or development may take place until a mitigation plan or other corrective
measures have been approved by the Planning Director.”
17.Cultural Resources Treatment Agreement. The developer is required to enter into a Cultural
Resources Treatment Agreement with the Pechanga Tribe. The agreement shall be in place
prior to issuance of a grading permit. To accomplish this, the applicant should contact the
Pechanga Tribe no less than 30 days and no more than 60 days prior to issuance of a grading
permit. This Agreement will address the treatment and disposition of cultural resources, the
designation, responsibilities, and participation of professional Pechanga Tribal monitors during
grading, excavation and ground disturbing activities; project grading and development
scheduling; terms of compensation for the monitors; and treatment and final disposition of any
cultural resources, sacred sites, and human remains discovered onsite. The Pechanga
monitor's authority to stop and redirect grading will be exercised in consultation with the project
archaeologist in order to evaluate the significance of any potential resources discovered on the
property. Pechanga and archaeological monitors shall be allowed to monitor all grading,
excavation and groundbreaking activities, and shall also have the limited authority to stop and
redirect grading activities should an inadvertent cultural resource be identified.
18.Discovery of Cultural Resources. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the
Grading Plan: “If cultural resources are discovered during the project construction (inadvertent
discoveries), all work in the area of the find shall cease, and the qualified archaeologist and the
Pechanga monitor shall investigate the find, and make recommendations as to treatment.”
19.Archaeological Monitoring Notes. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the
Grading Plan: “A qualified archaeological monitor will be present and will have the authority to
stop and redirect grading activities, in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe and their designated
monitors, to evaluate the significance of any archaeological resources discovered on the
property.”
20.Tribal Monitoring Notes. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading
Plan: “A Pechanga Tribal monitor will be present and will have the authority to stop and redirect
grading activities, in consultation with the project archaeologist and their designated monitors,
to evaluate the significance of any potential resources discovered on the property."
21.Relinquishment of Cultural Resources. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of
the Grading Plan: “The landowner agrees to relinquish ownership of all cultural resources,
including all archaeological artifacts that are found on the project area, to the Pechanga Tribe
for proper treatment and disposition.”
22.Preservation of Sacred Sites. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the
Grading Plan: “All sacred sites are to be avoided and preserved.”
23.MSHCP Pre-Construction Survey. A 30-day preconstruction survey, in accordance with
MSHCP guidelines and survey protocol, shall be conducted prior to ground disturbance. The
results of the 30-day preconstruction survey shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to
scheduling the pre-grading meeting with Public Works. If construction is delayed or suspended
for more than 30 days after the survey, the area shall be resurveyed.
24.Burrowing Owl Grading Note. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the
Grading Plan: “No grubbing/clearing of the site shall occur prior to scheduling the pre-grading
meeting with Public Works. All project sites containing suitable habitat for burrowing owls,
whether owls were found or not, require a 30-day preconstruction survey that shall be conducted
within 30 days prior to ground disturbance to avoid direct take of burrowing owls. If the results
of the survey indicate that no burrowing owls are present on-site, then the project may move
forward with grading, upon Planning Division approval. If burrowing owls are found to be
present or nesting on-site during the preconstruction survey, then the following
recommendations must be adhered to: Exclusion and relocation activities may not occur
during the breeding season, which is defined as March 1 through August 31, with the following
exception: From March 1 through March 15 and from August 1 through August 31 exclusion
and relocation activities may take place if it is proven to the City and appropriate regulatory
agencies (if any) that egg laying or chick rearing is not taking place. This determination must
be made by a qualified biologist.” If construction is delayed or suspended for more than 30
days after the survey, the area shall be resurveyed.
25.Archaeologist Retained. Prior to beginning project construction, the Project Applicant shall
retain a Riverside County qualified/City of Temecula approved archaeological monitor to monitor
all ground-disturbing activities in an effort to identify any unknown archaeological resources.
Any newly discovered cultural resource deposits shall be subject to a cultural resources
evaluation. The archaeological monitor's authority to stop and redirect grading will be
exercised in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe in order to evaluate the significance of any
potential resources discovered on the property. Pechanga and archaeological monitors shall be
allowed to monitor all grading, excavation and groundbreaking activities, and shall also have
the limited authority to stop and redirect grading activities should an inadvertent cultural
resource be identified. The archaeologist shall provide a final monitoring report at the end of all
earthmoving activities to the City of Temecula, the Pechanga Tribe and the Eastern Information
Center at UC, Riverside.
26.Human Remains. If human remains are encountered, California Health and Safety Code
Section 7050.5 states that no further disturbance shall occur until the Riverside County Coroner
has made the necessary findings as to origin. Further, pursuant to California Public Resources
Code Section 5097.98(b) remains shall be left in place and free from disturbance until a final
decision as to the treatment and disposition has been made. If the Riverside County Coroner
determines the remains to be Native American, the Native American Heritage Commission must
be contacted within 24 hours. The Native American Heritage Commission must then
immediately identify the “most likely descendant(s)” of receiving notification of the discovery.
The most likely descendant(s) shall then make recommendations within 48 hours, and engage
in consultations concerning the treatment of the remains as provided in Public Resources Code
5097.98 and the Treatment Agreement described in these conditions.
Prior to Issuance of Building Permit
27.Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). The City of Temecula adopted an ordinance
on March 31, 2003 to collect fees for a Riverside County area wide Transportation Uniform
Mitigation Fee (TUMF). This project is subject to payment of these fees at the time of building
permit issuance. The fees are subject to the provisions of Chapter 15.08 of the Temecula
Municipal Code and the fee schedule in effect at the time of building permit issuance.
28.Development Impact Fee (DIF). The developer shall comply with the provisions of Title 15,
Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all its resolutions by paying the appropriate
City fee.
29.Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans. Four (4) copies of Construction Landscaping
and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division. These plans
shall be submitted as a separate submittal, not as part of the building plans or other plan set.
These plans shall conform to the approved conceptual landscape plan, or as amended by these
conditions. The location, number, height and spread, water usage or KC value, genus,
species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be consistent with
the Water Efficient Ordinance and Water Storage Contingency Plan per the Rancho California
Water District. The plans shall be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee (per the City of
Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal) and one copy of the approved Grading Plan.
Landscaping Site Inspections. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include a note
30.
stating, “Three landscape site inspections are required. The first inspection will be conducted
at installation of irrigation while trenches are open. This will verify that irrigation equipment and
layout is per plan specifications and details. Any adjustments or discrepancies in actual
conditions will be addressed at this time and will require an approval to continue. Where
applicable, a mainline pressure check will also be conducted. This will verify that the irrigation
mainline is capable of being pressurized to 150 psi for a minimum period of two hours without
loss of pressure. The second inspection will verify that all irrigation systems are operating
properly, and to verify that all plantings have been installed consistent with the approved
construction landscape plans. The third inspection will verify property landscape maintenance
for release of the one-year landscape maintenance bond.” The applicant/owner shall contact
the Planning Division to schedule inspections.
31.Agronomic Soils Report. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include a note on the
plans stating, “The contractor shall provide two copies of an agronomic soils report at the first
irrigation inspection.”
32.Water Usage Calculations. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include water usage
calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water Efficient Ordinance), the total
cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with approved plan). Applicant shall
use evapotranspiration (ETo) factor of 0.70 for calculating the maximum allowable water budget.
33.Landscape Maintenance Program. A landscape maintenance program shall be submitted to
the Planning Division for approval. The landscape maintenance program shall detail the prope
r
maintenance of all proposed plant materials to assure proper growth and landscape
development for the long-term esthetics of the property. The approved maintenance program
shall be provided to the landscape maintenance contractor who shall be responsible to carry
out the detailed program.
34.Specifications of Landscape Maintenance Program. Specifications of the landscape
maintenance program shall indicate, “Three landscape site inspections are required. The first
inspection will be conducted at installation of irrigation while trenches are open. This will verify
that irrigation equipment and layout is per plan specifications and details. Any adjustments or
discrepancies in actual conditions will be addressed at this time and will require an approval to
continue. Where applicable, a mainline pressure check will also be conducted. This will verify
that the irrigation mainline is capable of being pressurized to 150 psi for a minimum period of
two hours without loss of pressure. The second inspection will verify that all irrigation systems
are operating properly, and to verify that all plantings have been installed consistent with the
approved construction landscape plans. The third inspection will verify property landscape
maintenance for release of the one-year landscape maintenance bond.” The applicant/owner
shall contact the Planning Division to schedule inspections.
35.Irrigation. The landscaping plans shall include automatic irrigation for all landscaped areas
and complete screening of all ground mounted equipment from view of the public from streets
and adjacent property for private common areas; front yards and slopes within individual lots;
shrub planting to completely screen perimeter walls adjacent to a public right-of-way equal to
66 feet or larger; and, all landscaping excluding City maintained areas and front yard
landscaping which shall include, but may not be limited to, private slopes and common areas.
36.Hardscaping. The landscape plans shall include all hardscaping for equestrian trails and
pedestrian trails within private common areas.
Wall and Fence Plans. Wall and fence plans shall be consistent with the Conceptual
37.
Landscape Plans showing the height, location and the following materials for all walls and
fences:
a. Decorative block for the perimeter of the project adjacent to a public right-of-way equal to 66
feet or larger and the side yards for corner lots.
b. Wrought iron or decorative block and wrought iron combination to take advantage of views
for side and rear yards.
c. Wood fencing shall be used for all side and rear yard fencing when not restricted/conditioned
outlined above.
38.Precise Grading Plans. Precise Grading Plans shall be consistent with the approved
conceptual grading plans including all structural setback measurements.
39.Landscaping Requirement for Phased Development. If any phase or area of the project site is
not scheduled for development within six months of the completion of grading, the landscaping
plans shall indicate it will be temporarily landscaped and irrigated for dust and soil erosion
control.
40.WQMP Landscape Compliance. The construction landscape plans shall be consistent with
Appendix A, Table 31 of the Low Impact Development (LID) Manual for Southern California for
plant materials and treatment facilities, and shall reference the approved precise grading plan
for WQMP features.
41.Utility Screening. All utilities shall be screened from public view. Landscape construction
drawings shall show and label all utilities and provide appropriate screening. Provide a
three-foot clear zone around fire check detectors as required by the Fire Department before
starting the screen. Group utilities together in order to reduce intrusion. Screening of utilities
is not to look like an after-thought. Plan planting beds and design around utilities. Locate all
light poles on plans and ensure that there are no conflicts with trees.
Prior to Release of Power, Building Occupancy or Any Use Allowed by This Permit
Landscape Installation Consistent with Construction Plans. All required landscape planting
42.
and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the approved construction plans and
shall be in a condition acceptable to the Director of Community Development. The plants shall
be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly
constructed and in good working order.
43.Performance Securities. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director
of Community Development, to guarantee the maintenance of the plantings in accordance with
the approved construction landscape and irrigation plan, shall be filed with the Planning Division
for a period of one year from final Certificate of Occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping
and irrigation system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Director of
Community Development, the bond shall be released upon request by the applicant.
44.Installation of Site Improvements. All site improvements, including but not limited to, parking
areas and striping shall be installed.
45.TCSD Service Levels. It shall be the developer’s responsibility to provide written disclosure of
the existence of the Temecula Community Service District (TCSD) and its service level rates
and charges to all prospective purchasers.
46.
Compliance with Conditions of Approval. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with
prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit.
47.Front Yard and Slope Landscaping. Front yard and slope landscaping within individual lots
shall be completed for inspection.
48.HOA Landscaping. HOA landscaping shall be completed for inspection for those lots adjacent
to HOA landscaped area.
Prior to Recordation of the Final Map
49.Final Map. A copy of the Final Map shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Planning
Division.
50.Quimby Requirements. The developer shall satisfy the City’s parkland dedication (Quimby)
requirement through the payment of in-lieu fees equivalent to a determined amount of acres of
parkland, based upon the City’s then current land evaluation. Said requirement includes a
credit for private recreational opportunities provided.
51.Environmental Constraint Sheet. A copy of the Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) shall be
submitted to, and approved by, the Planning Division with the following notes:
a. This property is located within 30 miles of Mount Palomar Observatory. All proposed outdoor
lighting systems shall comply with the California Institute of Technology, Palomar Observatory
recommendations, Ordinance No. 655.
b. Environmental Impact Report (EIR), (SCH# 97121030), was prepared for this project and is
on file at the City of Temecula Planning Division.
c. This project is within a Liquefaction Hazard Zone.
52.Submittal of CC&Rs. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) shall be
submitted and approved by the Director of Community Development. The CC&Rs shall include
liability insurance and methods of maintaining open space, recreation areas, parking areas,
private roads, exterior of all buildings, and all landscaped and open areas, including parkways.
Applicants shall provide a deposit in the amount of $3,750 for the review of new CC&Rs.
Amended CC&Rs will require a deposit of $2,000. The applicant shall be responsible for all
costs incurred during the review of the CC&Rs and additional fees may be required during the
course of the review.
53.Form and Content of CC&Rs. The CC&Rs shall be in the form and content approved by the
Director of Community Development, City Engineer, and the City Attorney, and shall include
such provisions as are required by this approval and as said officials deem necessary to protect
the interests of the City and its residents.
54.Preparation of CC&Rs. The CC&Rs shall be prepared at the developer’s sole cost and
expense.
Review of CC&Rs. The CC&Rs and Articles of Incorporation of the Property Owners
55.
Association are subject to the approval of the Director of Community Development, Public
Works Director, and the City Attorney.
56.CC&Rs and Management/Maintenance of Common Areas. The CC&Rs shall provide for the
effective establishment, operation, management, use, repair, and maintenance of all common
areas, drainage facilities, and pollution prevention devices outlined in the project’s Water Quality
Management Plan.
57.CC&Rs and Public Nuisance. The CC&Rs shall provide that the property shall be developed,
operated, and maintained so as not to create a public nuisance.
58.Termination of CC&Rs. The CC&Rs shall provide that the association may not be terminated
without prior City approval.
59.CC&Rs and Maintenance of Property. The CC&Rs shall provide that if the property is not
maintained in the condition required by the CC&Rs, then the City, after making due demand
and giving reasonable notice, may enter the property and perform, at the owner’s sole expense,
any maintenance required thereon by the CC&Rs or the City Ordinances. The property shall
be subject to a lien in favor of the City to secure any such expense not promptly reimbursed.
60.Interest in Association. Every owner of a suite or lot governed by CC&Rs shall own as an
appurtenance to such suite or lot, either: (1) an undivided interest in the common areas and
facilities, or (2) a share in the corporation, or voting membership in an association owning the
common areas and facilities.
61.Maintenance of Open Areas. All open areas and landscaping governed by CC&R shall be
permanently maintained by the association or other means acceptable to the City. Such proof
of this maintenance shall be submitted to the Planning Divisions and Public Works Department
prior to the issuance of building permits.
62.Reciprocal Easements. Reciprocal access easements and maintenance agreements ensuring
access to all parcels and joint maintenance of all roads, drives, parking areas, drainage facilities,
and water quality features, shall be provided by the CC&Rs or by deeds and shall be recorded
concurrent with the map or prior to the issuance of building permit where no map is involved.
63.Consent of City of Temecula. An Article must be added to every set of CC&Rs, following the
Declarant’s signature, to read as follows:
CONSENT OF CITY OF TEMECULA
The Conditions of Approval for Tentative Tract Map No. 37368 require the City of Temecula to
review and approve the CC&Rs for the Parcel. The City’s review of these CC&Rs has been
limited to a determination of whether the proposed CC&Rs properly implement the requirements
of the Conditions of Approval for the Parcel. The City’s consent to these CC&Rs does not
contain or imply any approval of the appropriateness or legality of the other provisions of the
CC&Rs, including, without limitation, the use restrictions, private easements and
encroachments, private maintenance requirements, architecture and landscape controls,
assessments, enforcement of assessments, resolutions of disputes or procedural matters.
Subject to the limitations set forth herein, the City consents to the CC&Rs.
___________________
__
Luke Watson
Director
Community Development
Approved as to Form:
___________________
__
Peter M. Thorson
City Attorney
64.Consent of City of Temecula. An Article must be added to every set of CC&Rs to read as
follows:
Article ___
CONSENT OF CITY OF TEMECULA
____1. The Conditions of Approval of Tentative Tract Map Number 37368 requires the City to
review and approve the CC&Rs for the Parcel.
____2. Declarant acknowledges that the City has reviewed these CC&Rs and that its review
is limited to a determination of whether the proposed CC&Rs properly implement the
requirements of the Conditions of Approval for the Parcel. The City’s consent to these CC&Rs
does not contain or imply any approval of the appropriateness or legality of the other provisions
of the CC&Rs, including, without limitation, the use restrictions, private easements and
encroachments, private maintenance requirements, architecture and landscape controls,
assessment procedures, assessment enforcement, resolution of disputes or procedural
matters.
___3. In the event of a conflict between the Conditions of Approval of the land use
_
entitlements issued by the City for the Parcel or Federal, State, or local laws, ordinances, and
regulations and these CC&Rs, the provisions of the Conditions of Approval and Federal, State
or local laws, ordinances, and regulations shall prevail, notwithstanding the language of the
CC&Rs.
____4. These CC&Rs shall not be terminated, amended or otherwise modified without the
express written consent of the Director Community Development of the City of Temecula.
65.Operation of Association. No lot or suite in the development shall be sold unless a corporation,
association, property owners group or similar entity has been formed with the right to assess all
properties individually owned or jointly owned which have any rights or interest in the use of the
common areas and common facilities in the development, such assessment power to be
sufficient to meet the expenses of such entity, and with authority to control, and the duty to
maintain, all of said mutually available features of the development. Such entity shall operate
under recorded CC&Rs, which shall include compulsory membership of all owners of lots and/or
suites and flexibility of assessments to meet changing costs of maintenance, repairs, and
services. Recorded CC&Rs shall permit enforcement by the City for provisions required as
Conditions of Approval. The developer shall submit evidence of compliance with this
requirement to, and receive approval of, the City prior to making any such sale. This condition
shall not apply to land dedicated to the City for public purposes.
66.
Recordation of CC&Rs. CC&Rs shall be finalized and recorded at the time of Final Map
Recordation.
67.Copies of CC&Rs. Three copies of the final recorded CC&Rs shall be provided to the Planning
Division.
68.Public Access Easement. A public access easement shall be provided, on the final map, for
the Class I trails located on the project site.
Outside Agencies
69.Compliance with Dept. of Environmental Health. The applicant shall comply with the
recommendations set forth in the County of Riverside Department of Environmental Healths
transmittal dated March 15, 2018, a copy of which is attached.
70.Compliance with County of Riverside Flood Control. The applicant shall comply with the
recommendations set forth in the County of Riverside Flood Control transmittal dated August
24, 2017, a copy of which is attached.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
General Requirements
71.
Subdivision Map. The developer shall submit a complete Tract Map submittal for review and
approval. Any omission to the representation of the site conditions may require the plans to be
resubmitted for further review and revision.
72.Permit restriction. No permits shall be issued unless future Development Plan applications are
submitted for approval.
73.Underlying Approvals. The Applicant shall comply with, if conflicting conditions of approval
prevail, the most stringent shall apply:
a. all underlying Conditions of Approval for Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan,
b. Tentative Tract Map No. 29353.
c. the Development Agreement and all amendments between the City of Temecula and Ashby
USA, LLC.
74.Grading Permit. A grading permit for rough and/or precise grading shall be obtained from
Public Works prior to commencement of any construction within private property. Grading shall
be in accordance with the approved grading plan, grading permit conditions and City
codes/standards.
75.Encroachment Permits. Prior to commencement of any applicable construction, encroachment
permit(s) are required; and shall be obtained:
a. from Public Works for public offsite improvements;
b. from Riverside County Flood Control & Water Conservation District (RCFC&WCD) if
encroaching within their right-of-way.
76.PW-007: Improvement Plans. The developer shall submit improvement plans (to include
public/private street plans, storm drain plans, traffic signal plans, signage and striping plans,
etc.) as required for review and approval by Public Works. The designs shall be in compliance
with Caltrans, Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District and City
codes/standards.
77.Private Drainage Facilities. All onsite drainage and water quality facilities shall be privately
maintained.
78.Landscaped Plans (for parkways, medians & public parks). The developer:
a. shall contact the Park/Landscape Maintenance Supervisor for a pre-design meeting to
discuss design parameters. The design shall be in conformance with the Temecula Community
Services District’s Landscape Standards.
b. his successor or assignee, shall be responsible for the maintenance of the landscaped
parkways, medians or public parks until such time Public Works accepts that responsibility.
79.WQMP Landscape Compliance. The construction landscape plans shall be consistent with
Appendix A, Table 31 of the Low Impact Development (LID) Manual for Southern California for
plant materials and treatment facilities, and shall reference the approved precise grading plan
for WQMP features.
80.Implementing facilities. The Developer shall ensure the following:
a. Construction of the development permitted by the Specific Plan, including recordation of
final subdivision maps, may be carried out in stages provided that, ultimate improvements to
provide vehicular access is constructed for all dwelling units in each stage of development and
further provided that such development conforms substantially with the intent and purpose of
the Specific Plan.
b. Adequate primary and secondary access shall be provided for each phase of development
as approved by the City Engineer. Additional rights-of-way at entries to the aforementioned sites
may be required to provide for turning lanes as directed by the City Engineer.
c. Drainage facilities within each phase shall be constructed immediately after the completion
of the site grading and prior to or concurrently with the initial site development within that phase.
d. The Developer shall construct the proposed on and offsite drainage facility improvements
and the interim detention basin provision as recommended in the Drainage Study and/or as
directed by the Department of Public Works.
e. All areas within the limits of work must be designed to address Water Quality and designated
as self-treating areas, self-retaining areas, areas draining to self-retaining areas, or areas
draining to BMPs
Prior to Recordation of the Final Map
81.Conditions of Approval. The developer shall comply with all Conditions of Approval, the
Engineering and Construction Manual and all City codes/standards at no cost to any
governmental agency.
82.
Plans, Agreements & Securities. The developer shall have approved improvement plans,
executed subdivision improvement agreements and posted securities.
83.Right-of-Way Dedications. All easements and/or right-of-way dedications shall be offered for
dedication to the public or other appropriate agency and shall continue in force until the City
accepts or abandons such offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as
approved by Public Works.
84.Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS). The developer shall prepare and record an ECS with
the Tract Map to delineate identified environmental concerns. The developer shall comply with
all constraints per the recorded ECS along with any underlying maps related to the property.
85.Required Clearances. As deemed necessary by Public Works, the developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
a. Eastern Municipal Water District
b. Rancho California Water District
c. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
d. City of Temecula Fire Prevention Bureau
e. Planning Department
f. Department of Public Works
g. Riverside County Health Department
h. Cable TV Franchise
i. Community Services District
j. General Telephone
k. Southern California Edison Company
l. Southern California Gas Company
m. Fish & Wildlife
n. Army Corps of Engineers
o. Metropolitan Water District, or other affected agencies
86.Right of Access. Relinquish and waive right of access to and from Butterfield Stage Road on
the Tract Map with the exception of three openings as delineated on the approved Tentative
Tract Map.
87.Easements. Note the following:
a. Private easements for cross-lot drainage shall be delineated and noted on the Tract Map.
b. Easements (when required for roadway slopes, landscape, drainage facilities, utilities, etc.)
shall be shown on the Tract Map if they are located within the land division boundary. All offers
of dedication and conveyances shall be submitted for review and recorded, as directed by Public
Works. Onsite drainage facilities located outside of road right-of-way shall be contained within
drainage easements and shown on the Tract Map. A note shall be added to the Tract Map
stating: “Drainage easements shall be kept free of buildings and obstructions.”
88.RCFC&WCD Approval. A copy of the grading and improvement plans, along with supporting
hydrologic and hydraulic calculations, shall be submitted to the Riverside County Flood Control
and Water Conservation District for approval prior to issuance of any permit.
89.Public Street Improvements and Securities. The developer shall design and guarantee
construction (i.e., posting of security and entering into agreements) of the following public
improvements (including parkways, medians and public park improvements) to the City’s
General Plan standards unless otherwise noted. Plans shall be approved by Public Works.
All street improvement designs shall provide adequate right-of-way and pavement transitions
per Caltrans’ standards to join existing street improvements.
a. Improve Loop Road from Station 13+75 to Station 15+71, Station 19+61 to Station 40+72,
Station 43+58 to Station 53+35, and Station 56+32 to Station 98+59 (Modified Street Section
per the Specific Plan - 77’ R/W) to include dedication of full-width street right-of-way, installation
of full-width street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, trail, street lights, drainage
facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer).
b. Improve Loop Road from Station 15+71 to Station 16+55, Station 18+70 to Station 19+61,
Station 42+78 to Station 43+58, and Station 55+51 to Station 56+32, (Modified Street Section
per the Specific Plan – 77’ R/W) to include dedication of full-width street right-of-way, installation
of full-width street improvements, paving, raised landscaped median, curb and gutter, sidewalk,
street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water
and sewer).
c. Improve Loop Road at North Entry from Station 10+00 to Station 13+75 (Modified Street
Section per the Specific Plan – 98’ R/W) to include dedication of full-width street right-of-way,
installation of full-width street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, trail, street
lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and
sewer).
d. Improve Loop Road at South Entry from Station 98+59 to Station 103+59 (Modified Street
Section per the Specific Plan – 76’ R/W) to include dedication of full-width street right-of-way,
installation of full-width street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, street lights, drainage
facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer).
e. Improve Loop Road roundabout from Station 16+55 to Station 18+70, Station 40+72 to
Station 42+78, and Station 43+35 to Station 55+51 (Roundabout Section as shown on the
Tentative Tract Map) to include dedication of full-width street right-of-way, installation of
full-width street improvements, paving, raised landscaped median, curb and gutter, sidewalk,
street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water
and sewer).
f. All street improvement design shall provide adequate right-of-way and pavement transitions
per Caltrans standards for transition to existing street sections.
90.Traffic Signal Installation. The developer shall design and guarantee installation of the traffic
signal at the intersection of:
a. Butterfield Stage Road and Murrieta Hot Springs Road
b. Butterfield Stage Road and Nicolas Road
c. Butterfield Stage Road and Calle Chapos
d. Nicolas Road at Winchester Road
91.Undergrounding Wires. All existing and proposed electrical and telecommunication lines,
except electrical lines rated 34KV or greater, shall be installed underground per Title 15, Chapter
15.04 of the Temecula Municipal Code and utility provider’s standards. The developer is
responsible for any associated costs, for making arrangements with each utility agency and for
obtaining the necessary easements.
92.Undergrounding Utility Systems. All utility systems including gas, electric, telephone, water,
sewer and cable TV shall be provided underground (with the required easements); and shall
be designed and constructed in accordance with City codes and utility provider’s standards.
Telephone, cable TV and/or security systems shall be pre-wired in the residence. The
developer shall notify the City’s cable TV franchisees of the Intent to Develop. Conduit shall
be installed to cable TV standards at time of street improvements.
93.Acquisition of Offsite Property. The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire required
offsite property interests, and if he or she should fail to do so, the developer shall, prior to
submittal of the Tract Map for recordation, enter into an agreement to complete the
improvements pursuant to Subdivision Map Act, Sections 66462 and 66462.5. The agreement
shall provide for payment by the developer of all costs incurred by the City to acquire the offsite
property interests required in connection with the subdivision. Security of a portion of these
costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained
by the developer (at developer’s cost). The appraiser shall be approved by the City prior to
commencement of the appraisal.
94.ssessments. Pursuant to Section 66493 of the Subdivision Map Act, any subdivision, which
A
is part of an existing Assessment District, must comply with the requirements of said section.
The developer shall submit an application for reapportionment of any assessments with the
appropriate regulatory agency.
95.Property Taxes. Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid.
96.Parcel Geometry. The applicant shall submit an editable projected digital version of the parcel
geometry in a drawing exchange format (pursuant to Riverside County standards). Prior to
final approval, the City’s GIS Division shall conduct quality control on the data to verify accuracy
and compatibility.
Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit
97.Required Clearances. As deemed necessary by Public Works, the developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
a. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District;
b. Metropolitan Water District;
c. Army Corps of Engineers;
d. California Department of Fish and Wildlife; and/or other affected agencies.
98.Grading/Erosion & Sediment Control Plan. The developer shall submit a grading/erosion &
sediment control plan(s) to be reviewed and approved by Public Works. All plans shall be
coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the
site. The approved plan shall include all final WQMP water quality facilities and all
construction-phase pollution-prevention controls to adequately address non-permitted runoff.
Refer to the City’s Engineering & Construction Manual at:
http://www.cityoftemecula.org/Temecula/Government/PublicWorks/engineeringconstmanual.ht
m
99.Erosion & Sediment Control Securities. The developer shall comply with the provisions of
Chapter 24, Section 18.24.140 of the Temecula Municipal Code by posting security and entering
into an agreement to guarantee the erosion & sediment control improvements.
100. NPDES General Permit Compliance. The developer shall obtain project coverage under the
State National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit for
Construction Activities and shall provide the following:
a. A copy of the Waste Discharge Identification number (WDID) issued by the State Water
Resources Control Board (SWRCB);
b. The project’s Risk Level (RL) determination number; and
c. The name, contact information and certification number of the Qualified SWPPP Developer
(QSD).
Pursuant to the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) requirements and City’s storm
water ordinance, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be generated and
submitted to the Board. Throughout the project duration, the SWPPP shall be routinely
updated and readily available (onsite) to the State and City. Review
www.cabmphandbooks.com for SWPPP guidelines. Refer to the following link:
http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/water_issues/programs/stormwater/construction.shtml
101. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) and O&M Agreement.. The developer shall submit
a final WQMP (prepared by a registered professional engineer) with the initial grading plan
submittal for any phase approval by Public Works. A copy of the final project-specific WQMP
must be kept onsite at all times. Refer to the WQMP template and agreement link below:
http://www.cityoftemecula.org/Temecula/Government/PublicWorks/WQMPandNPDES/WQMP.
htm
102. Area Drainage Plan (ADP) Fee to RCFC&WCD. The developer shall demonstrate to the City
that the flood mitigation charge (ADP fee) has been paid to RCFC&WCD. If the full ADP fee has
already been credited to this property, no new charge will be required.
103. Drainage Study. A drainage study shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer and
submitted to Public Works with the initial grading plan check in accordance with City, Riverside
County and engineering standards. The study shall identify storm water runoff quantities (to
mitigate the 10 and 100-year storm event for 24 hour storm duration peak flow) from the
development of this site and upstream of the site. It shall identify all existing or proposed offsite
or onsite, public or private, drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. Runoff shall be
conveyed to an adequate outfall capable of receiving the storm water runoff without damage to
public or private property. The study shall include a capacity analysis verifying the adequacy
of all facilities. Any upgrading or upsizing of drainage facilities necessary to convey the storm
water runoff shall be provided as part of development of this project.
104. Soils Report. A soils report, prepared by a registered soil or civil engineer, shall be submitted
to Public Works with the initial grading plan submittal. The report shall address the site’s soil
conditions and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and
preliminary pavement sections.
105. Geological Report. The developer shall complete any outstanding County geologist’s
requirements, recommendations and/or proposed Conditions of Approval as identified during
entitlement.
106. Letter of Permission/Easement. The developer shall obtain documents (letters of permission
or easements) for any offsite work performed on adjoining properties. The document’s format
is as directed by, and shall be submitted to, Public Works for acceptance. The document
information shall be noted on the approved grading plan.
107. Habitat Conservation Fee. The developer shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of
the Temecula Municipal Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in
the ordinance or by providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid.
Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s)
108. Tract Map. Tract Map Number 37368 shall be approved and recorded.
109. Precise Grading Plan. A precise grading plan shall be submitted to Public Works for review
and approval. The plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved rough grading
plan; and shall show all lot drainage directed to the driveway by side yard drainage swales
independent of any other lot. The building pad shall be certified by a registered civil engineer
for location and elevation; and the soils engineer shall issue a final soils report addressing
compaction and site conditions.
Development Impact Fees. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities
110.
Development Impact Fee as required by, and in accordance with the Development Agreement
between the City and Developer
Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy
111.
Completion of Improvements. The developer shall complete all work per the approved plans
and Conditions of Approval to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. This includes all on site
work (including water quality facilities), public improvements and the executed WQMP
Operation and Maintenance agreement.
112. Utility Agency Clearances. The developer shall receive written clearance from applicable utility
agencies (i.e., Eastern Municipal Water District, etc.) for the completion of their respective
facilities and provide to Public Works.
113. Replacement of Damaged Improvements/Monuments. Any appurtenance damaged or broken
during development shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of Public
Works. Any survey monuments damaged or destroyed shall be reset per City Standards by a
qualified professional pursuant to the California Business and Professional Code Section 8771.
114. Certifications. All necessary certifications and clearances from engineers, utility companies
and public agencies shall be submitted as required by Public Works.
115. Traffic Signal installation. Prior to the FIRST Certificate of Occupancy, the following traffic
signals shall be installed and operational:
a. Butterfield Stage Road and Murrieta Hot Springs Road
b. Butterfield Stage Road and Nicolas Road
c. Butterfield Stage Road and Calle Chapos
d. Nicolas Road at Winchester Road
FIRE PREVENTION
General Requirements
116. Requirements. All previous existing conditions for this project, Specific Plan, or Development
Agreement will remain in full force and effect unless superseded by more stringent requirements
here
117. Life Safety Conditions. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building
plans are reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on
occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related
codes which are in force at the time of building plan submittal
118. Traffic Calming Devices. All traffic calming devices that could impede or slow emergency
vehicle access are prohibited, except those expressly approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau
individually on a case by case basis when they maintain the required travel widths and radii
119. Construction Phasing. If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access
and fire protection prior to any building construction. This will include all internal roads,
connecting roads between phases, and construction gates. All required access must be in and
available prior to and during all construction. Phasing is approved on a separate map, and is
ultimately subject to final approval in the field (CFC Chapter 5)
Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit(s)
120. Turning Radius (Culdesac). Maximum cul-de-sac length shall not exceed 1320 feet.
Minimum outside turning radius on any cul-de-sac shall be 37-feet for single family dwelling
tracts and 45 feet for commercial and multi-family dwelling tracts. (CFC Chapter 5 along with
the Temecula City Ordinance 15.16.020).
121. All Weather Access Roads (W/Hardscape/Landscape). Cul-de-sacs and/or intersections with
planters must maintain 24-foot clear unobstructed travel width around the planters, not including
parking. Hardscape areas are permissible provided they meet the 80,000 lb. GVW load
requirements and are at road level.
122. ccess Road Widths (Private Driveway). Private entry driveways with divider medians must
A
be a minimum of 16 feet wide on each side and the median is held back 30 feet from face of
curb of perpendicular road.
123. Access Road Widths. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width
of not less than 24 feet for with an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6
inches (CFC Chapter 5 and Temecula City Ordinance 15.16.020).
124. All Weather Access Roads. Fire apparatus access roads and driveways shall be designed and
maintained to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus and shall be with a surface to provide
all-weather driving capabilities. Access roads shall be 80,000 lb. GVW with a minimum of AC
thickness of .25 feet. In accordance with Section 3310.1, prior to building construction, all
locations where structures are to be built shall have fire apparatus access roads. (CFC
Chapter 5 and Temecula City Ordinance 15.16.020).
125. Turning Radius (Dead End Roadway). Dead end roadways and streets in excess of 150 feet
which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of accommodating fire
apparatus (CFC Chapter 5 and Temecula City Ordinance 15.16.020)
Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s)
126. Two Point Access. This development and any street within serving more than 35 homes or any
commercial developments shall have two points of access, via all-weather surface roads, as
approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau (CFC Chapter 5).
Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy
127.
File Format Requirements. A simple plot plan and a simple floor plan, each as an electronic
file of the .DWG format, must be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau. Contact Fire
Prevention for approval of alternative file formats which may be acceptable
PC DRAFT RESOLUTION
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 37341
PC RESOLUTION NO. 18-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. PA17-1220, A TENTATIVE TRACT
MAP (TTM 37341) SUBDIVIDING TTM 37368 INTO
EIGHTEEN INDIVIDUAL TENTATIVE TRACT MAPS
TOTALING 220.8 ACRES AND CREATING 939 SINGLE
FAMILY LOTS AND 50 NON-RESIDENTIAL LOTS FOR
RORIPAUGH RANCH PHASE II, AND MAKING A FINDING
OF EXEMPTION UNDER THE CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA)
Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of
Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that:
A. On August 8, 2017, Woodside Homes Southern California Division filed
Planning Application Nos. PA17-1219, a Tentative Tract Map (TTM 37368) for the
creation of 26 parcels on 382.8 acres for residential, public institutional, public park,
private recreation center, and open space development; and PA17-1220, a Tentative
Tract Map (TTM 37341) subdividing TTM 37368 into eighteen individual Tentative Tract
Maps totaling 220.8 acres and creating 939 single family lots and 50 non-residential lots
for Roripaugh Ranch Phase II, in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General
Plan and Development Code.
B. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice,
in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law.
C. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application
and environmental review on June 20, 2018, at a duly noticed public hearing as
prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity
to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter.
D. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due
consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application
No. PA17-1220, subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder.
E. All legal preconditions to the adoption of the Resolution have occurred.
Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving the
Application hereby finds, determines and declares that:
Tentative Tract Map, Development Code Section 16.09.140
A. The proposed subdivision and the design and improvements of the
subdivision are consistent with the Development Code, General Plan, any applicable
specific plan, and the City of Temecula Municipal Code.
The maximum number of residential units allowed within the entire Roripaugh
Ranch Specific Plan is 2,015. With what is proposed as a part of these Tentative
Tract Maps plus what has been previously constructed as part of Phase I the total
number of residential units is 1,448, which is 567 units below what is allowed per
the Specific Plan. Therefore, the proposed subdivision and the design and
improvements of the subdivision are consistent with the Development Code,
General Plan, the City of Temecula Municipal Code, and the Roripaugh Ranch
Specific Plan.
B. The Tentative Map does not propose to divide land, which is the subject to
a contract entered into pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965, or the
land is subject to a Land Conservation Act contract but the resulting parcels following
division of the land will not be too small to sustain their agricultural use.
The proposed property has not been used as agricultural land and has never been
entered into any Williamson Act contracts.
C. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of
development proposed by the Tentative Map.
The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development
proposed by the Tentative Maps. The proposed Tentative Maps are in accordance
with what is allowed by the previously approved Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan
which allows for 2,015 residential units along with public institutional, public park,
private recreation center, and open space development.
D. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements, with
Conditions of Approval, are either:
1. Not likely to cause significant environmental damage or substantially and
avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat, or
2. An environmental impact report has been prepared and a finding has been
made, pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081(a)(3), finding that
specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible mitigation
measures or project alternatives identified in the environmental impact report;.
An Environmental Impact Report and subsequent Addenda to the EIR have been
prepared for the project. The project is conditioned to comply with all mitigation
measures identified within EIR No. SCH# 97121030. Therefore, the design of the
subdivision and the proposed improvements, with Conditions of Approval, will not
likely cause significant environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure
fish or wildlife or their habitat.
E. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely
to cause serious public health problems.
The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause
serious public health problems because the proposed development is consistent
with all applicable building, development and fire codes, which include provisions
to safeguard public health, and will be further reviewed and inspected by City staff
for compliance with all applicable building, development and fire codes prior to
issuance of any grading, building, or occupancy permits.
F. The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating
or cooling opportunities in the subdivision to the extent feasible.
The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating or
cooling opportunities. The project has been designed to ensure that all setbacks
have been met and that light and air access is available to the extent possible. In
addition, the construction will be required to conform to all state energy efficiency
codes as well.
G. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict
with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property
within the proposed subdivision, or the design of the alternate easements which are
substantially equivalent to those previously acquired by the public will be provided.
The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements have been considered
in the design of the subdivision, and will not conflict with existing or future
easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property
within the proposed subdivision. All required easements and dedications are
required as Conditions of Approval.
H.
requirements (Quimby Act).
The su
(Quimby Act) because payment of Quimby fees will be required prior to the
recordation of the final map.
Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes
the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval
of the Development Plan:
A. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed
project has been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review
(Section 15162, Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations);
1. The Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan was formally adopted in 2002. An
Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared and certified on
December 17, 2002 as part of this effort. Since that time, three Addendum
EIRs have been prepared for the project area with the most recent adopted
on January 23, 2018. The proposed project has been determined to be
consistent with the previously adopted Roripaugh Ranch Addendum EIR
and is exempt from further environmental review (Section 15162,
Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations). Staff has reviewed the EIR,
the First Addendum to the EIR adopted on April 23, 2013, the Second
Addendum to the EIR adopted on March 22, 2016, the Third Addendum to
the EIR adopted on January 23, 2018, and has determined that the
proposed project does not require the preparation of a subsequent
Environmental Impact Report or Mitigated Negative Declaration as none of
the conditions described in Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal.
Code Regs. 15162) exist. Specifically, there are no substantial changes
proposed by the proposed project that will require major revisions of the
previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental
effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified
significant effects; no substantial changes have occurred with respect to the
circumstances under which the proposed project are undertaken that will
require major revisions of the previous EIR due to the involvement of new
significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of
previously identified significant effects; and there is no new information of
substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been
known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous
EIR was adopted, showing that: (a) the proposed project will have one or
more significant effects not discussed in the EIR; (b) there are significant
effects previously examined that will be substantially more severe than
shown in the EIR; (c) there are mitigation measures or alternatives
previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would
substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the proposed project,
but the City declines to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or (d)
mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from
those analyzed in the EIR would substantially reduce one or more
significant effects on the environment, but the City declines to adopt the
mitigation measure or alternative. The proposed project meets all
requirements and mitigation contained in EIR and the Addenda to the EIR.
Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula
approves Planning Application No. PA17-1220, a Tentative Tract Map (TTM 37341)
subdividing TTM 37368 into eighteen individual Tentative Tract Maps totaling 220.8 acres
and creating 939 single family lots and 50 non-residential lots for Roripaugh Ranch Phase
II, and makes a finding of exemption under the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA), subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and
incorporated herein by this reference.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED
Section 5. by the City of Temecula
Planning Commission this 20thday of June,2018.
Gary Youmans, Chairperson
ATTEST:
Luke Watson
Secretary
\[SEAL\]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Luke Watson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify
that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 18- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 20th day of
June, 2018, by the following vote:
AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Luke Watson
Secretary
DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 37341
Single-Family with Attached Garage
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Notice of Public Hearing
A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the City of Temecula PLANNING
COMMISSION to consider the matter described below:
CASE NO: PA17-1219, PA17-1220
APPLICANT:Woodside Homes Southern California Division
PROPOSAL:A Tentative Tract Map (TTM 37368) for the creation of 26 parcels on 382.8 acres for
residential, public institutional, public park, private recreation center, and open space
development; and a Tentative Tract Map (TTM 37341) subdividing TTM 37368 into
eighteen individual Tentative Tract Maps totaling 220.8 acres and creating 939 single
family lots and 50 non-residential lots for Roripaugh Ranch Phase II.
ENVIRONMENTAL:In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed project
is exempt from further environmental review and a Notice of Exemption will be adopted in
compliance with CEQA (Section 15162, Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations)
CASE PLANNER: Scott Cooper, (951) 506-5137
PLACE OF HEARING: 41000 Main St., Temecula, CA 92590,City of Temecula, Council Chambers
DATE OF HEARING: June 20, 2018 TIME OF HEARING: 6:00 p.m.
The complete agenda packet (including any supplemental materials) will be available for viewing in the Main Reception area at the
Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula) after 4:00 p.m. the Friday before the Planning Commission Meeting. At that time, the
packet may also be accessed on the City’s website – TemeculaCA.gov and will be available for public review at the respective meeting. Any
writing distributed to a majority of the Commission regarding any item on the Agenda, after the posting of the Agenda, will be available for public
review in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula), 8:00 a.m. – 5:00 p.m. In addition, such material
will be made available on the City’s website – TemeculaCA.gov – and will be available for public review at the meeting.
Any petition for judicial review of a decision of the Planning Commission shall be filed within time required by, and controlled by, Sections
1094.5 and 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. In any such action or proceeding seeking judicial review of, which attacks or
seeks to set aside, or void any decision of the Planning Commission shall be limited to those issues raised at the hearing or in written
correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing described in this notice.
Questions? Please call the Community Development Department at (951) 694-6400.
AERIAL MAP
PLAN REDUCTIONS
DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION
PC RESOLUTION NO. 18-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. PA18-0506, A CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT TO ALLOW FOR THE ENTITLEMENT OF A
PREVIOUSLY CONSTRUCTED PLAYGROUND/PARK
FACILITY AT REGENTS HILL PARK LOCATED AT TRACT
23143-9, AND MAKING A FINDING OF EXEMPTION
UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
ACT (CEQA) (APN: 965-031-034)
Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of
Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that:
A. On April 4, 2018, Lisa Johns, representing the Temecula Crowne Hill
Community Association, filed Planning Application No. PA18-0506, a Conditional Use
Permit in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development
Code.
B. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice,
in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law.
C. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application
and environmental review on June 20, 2018, at a duly noticed public hearing as
prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity
to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter.
D. At the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of
the testimony, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No. PA18-0506
subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder.
E. All legal preconditions to the adoption of the Resolution have occurred.
Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving the
Application hereby finds, determines and declares that:
Conditional Use Permit, Section 17.04.010.E
A. The proposed conditional use is consistent with the General Plan and the
Development Code;
The proposed use is located in a previously landscaped open space area. The
proposed conditional use is consistent with the City of Temecula General Plan,
which specifies Open Space for this site. The Open Space designation identifies
private parks in the General Plan. The Open Space/Conservation Element of the
General Plan provides that a quality parks and recreation system is a high priority
for Temecula residents. Goal 1 of the Open Space/Conservation Element is for
the City to have “\[a\] high quality parks and recreation system that meets the
diverse recreation needs of residents.” The proposed conditional use adheres to
this policy described in the General Plan. The Development Code identifies private
parks as conditionally permitted use in the Open Space zoning district.
B. The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and
development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures and the proposed conditional use
will not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings or structures.
The proposed conditional use is located in a previously landscaped open space
area. As conditioned, the proposed conditional use for a park is compatible with
the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures
because the surrounding area includes previously developed open space. The
proposed conditional use will not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings or
structures because the surrounding area is designed for open space uses.
C. The site for a proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to
accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas,
landscaping, and other development features prescribed in the Development Code and
required by the Planning Commission or City Council in order to integrate the use with
other uses in the neighborhood.
The site for the proposed conditional use will be required to be permitted and
inspected in compliance with the development standards of the Development Code
and is therefore adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls,
fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other
development features prescribed in the Development Code and required by the
Planning Director, Planning Commission or City Council in order to integrate the
use with other uses in the neighborhood.
D. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health,
safety and general welfare of the community.
The project meets all the requirements of the Development Code, Fire Code and
the Building Code, which provided safeguards for the health, safety and general
welfare of the community. Therefore, the project is not anticipated to be detrimental
to the health, safety and general welfare of the community.
E. That the decision to conditionally approve or deny the application for a
Conditional Use Permit be based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole
before the Planning Director, Planning Commission or City Council on appeal.
The decision to conditionally approve the application for a Conditional Use Permit
has been based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before
the Planning Commission.
Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes
the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval
of the Conditional Use Permit Application:
A. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed
project has been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review
(Section 15332, Class 32, In-Fill Development).
The project is consistent with the general plan designation (Open Space) and the zoning
designation (Open Space). The project was previously developed as an open space area
and was graded to function as landscaped open space. The project site is 2.1 acres and
has not been identified as a site with endangered, rare, or threatened species. The
approval of the project is not anticipated to result in any significant effects related to traffic,
noise, air quality or water quality. All required utilities and public services are available to
the site.
Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula
approves Planning Application No. PA18-0506, subject to the Conditions of Approval set
forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED
by the City of Temecula
Planning Commission this 20th day of June, 2018.
Gary Youmans, Chairman
ATTEST:
Luke Watson, Secretary
\[SEAL\]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Luke Watson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby
certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 18- was duly and regularly adopted by
the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on
the 20th day of June, 2018, by the following vote:
AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Luke Watson, Secretary
EXHIBIT A
DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Notice of Public Hearing
A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the City of Temecula
PLANNING COMMISSION to consider the matter described below:
CASE NO:
PA18-0506
APPLICANT:
Temecula Crowne Hill Community Association
PROPOSAL:
A Conditional Use Permit to allow for the entitlement of a previously constructed
playground/park facility at Regents Hill Park located at Tract 23143-9 (APN:
965-031-034)
ENVIRONMENTAL:
In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the
proposed project is exempt from further environmental review and a Notice of
Exemption will be adopted in compliance with CEQA (15332, Class 32, In-Fill
Development)
CASE PLANNER:
Brandon Rabidou, (951)506-5142
PLACE OF HEARING:
41000 Main St., Temecula, CA 92590,City of Temecula, Council Chambers
DATE OF HEARING: TIME OF HEARING:
June 20, 2018 6:00 p.m.
The complete agenda packet (including any supplemental materials) will be available for viewing in the Main Reception area at
the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula) after 4:00 p.m. the Friday before the Planning Commission Meeting.
At that time, the packet may also be accessed on the City’s website – TemeculaCA.gov and will be available for public review at
the respective meeting. Any writing distributed to a majority of the Commission regarding any item on the Agenda, after the posting
of the Agenda, will be available for public review in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street,
Temecula), 8:00 a.m. – 5:00 p.m. In addition, such material will be made available on the City’s website – TemeculaCA.gov – and
will be available for public review at the meeting.
Any petition for judicial review of a decision of the Planning Commission shall be filed within time required by, and controlled by,
Sections 1094.5 and 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. In any such action or proceeding seeking judicial review
of, which attacks or seeks to set aside, or void any decision of the Planning Commission shall be limited to those issues raised at
the hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing described in this notice.
Questions?
Please call the Community Development Department at (951) 694-6400.
R:\\1AGENDA MANAGER\\PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS\\2018\\062018\\PA18-0506 (RABIDOU)\\PA18-0506 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING V2.DOCX