HomeMy WebLinkAbout061097 CC AgendaIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in
this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (909) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior
to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that
meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II]
AGENDA
TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
A REGULAR MEETING
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE
JUNE 10, 1997- 7:00 PM
5:30 PM - Closed Session of.the City Council pursuant to Government Code Sections:
1. §54957,6, Conference.with Cityes LaborNegotiator, Grant ;Yates.
2. §54956.8, Conference with Realproperty:neg0tiator,.Propert¥: 3;09 acres located at the
northwesterly corner of La:.Paz. Road and State ~Route79~.APN 922-t~90-25; Negotiating Parties:
Mike Moramarco,.County of Riverside and the City of Temecula;'Under negotiation: price and
terms of payment. ·
At approximately 9:45 PM, the City Council will determine which of the remaining
agenda items can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00 PM and may
continue all other items on which additional time is required until a future meeting.
All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 PM.
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. 97-11
Resolution: No. 97-53
CALL TO ORDER:
Mayor Patricia H. Birdsall presiding
Prelude Music:
Jared Reed
Invocation:
Reverend Lyle Peterson, Hope Lutheran Church
Flag Salute:
Councilmember Lindemans
ROLL CALL:
Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, Stone, Birdsall
PRESENTATIONS/
PROCLAMATIONS:
Proclamation to Chief Jim Wright
Presentation by Noon Rotary to City of Temecula
Certificate of Appreciation to Noon Rotary
Certificate of Appreciation to Jan Weilert
Presentation to Albert Crisp
Certificate of Commendation to Kyle Kane
R:\Agencia~061097 I
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 30 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Council on
items that appear within the Consent Calendar or ones that are not listed on the agenda.
Speakers are.limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council on an
item which is listed on the Consent Calendar or a matter no1; listed on the agenda, a pink
"Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all Public Hearing or Council Business matters on the agenda, a "Request to Speak"
form must be filed with the City Clerk before the Council gets to that item. There is a five
(5) minute time limit for individual speakers.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made at
this time. A total, not to exceed, ten (10) minutes will be devoted to these reports.
CONSENT CALENDAR
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be
enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless members of
the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate
action.
1 Standard Ordinance Adoption Procedure
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in
the agenda.
2 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve the minutes of May 13, 1997.
2.2 Approve the minutes of May 27, 1997.
R:\Agenda~061097 2
3
4
5
Resolution Approving List of Demands
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 97-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING
CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
City Treasurer's Statement of Investment Policy
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Adopt the Treasurer's Statement of Investment Policy as proposed by staff which
provides safety, liquidity and yield for City funds.
Accept Offers of Dedication for Street, Utility and Services Purposes Within Parcel Maps
No. 4646 and 28084 for Portions of Zevo Drive. Winchester Road and Reminaton Avenue
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 97-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING
OFFERS OF DEDICATION FOR PUBLIC STREET, UTILITY AND SERVICES PURPOSES
WlTH;N PARCEL MAPS NO, 4646 AND 28084 BUT NOT ACCEPTING INTO THE
CITY-MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM
Accept Public Improvements in Tract No. 22915-2 (Located at the Northwesterly corner of
the Intersection of Pauba Road at Butterfield Stage Road)
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1
6.2
6.3
Accept the Public Improvements in Tract No. 22915-2;
Authorize the initiation of the one-year warranty period, reduction of the Faithful
Performance Street, and Water and Sewer security amounts, and release of the
Subdivision Monument security;
Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Surety.
R:~Agenda\061097 3
7
8
9
10
Acceptance of Public Streets into the City-Maintained Street System ¢Within Tracts No.
22915-2 and 22915-3) (Located Southwesterly of the intersection of Rancho Vista Road at
Butterfield Stage Road)
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 97-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING
CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY-MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM
(WITHIN TRACTS NO. 22915-2 AND 22915-3)
Accept Public Improvements in Tract No. 22915-3 (Located at the Southwesterly corner of
the Intersection of Rancho Vista Road at Butterfield Stage Road)
RECOMMENDATION:
8.1 Accept the Public Improvements in Tract No. 22915-3;
8.2 Authorize the initiation of the one-year warranty period, reduction of the Faithful
Performance Street, and Water and Sewer security amounts, and release of the
Subdivision Monument security;
8.3 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Surety.
Release Warranty and Labor and Materials Bonds in Tract No. 23126 (Located Southerly of
the Intersection of Nicolas Road at Roripaugh Road)
RECOMMENDATION:
9.1 Authorize the release of the Faithful Performance Warranty Bond Riders for Street,
Drainage, and Water and Sewer Improvements and the Labor and Material Bonds in
Tract No. 23126;
9.2 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, the
developer and surety.
Accept Public Improvements in Tract No. 27827-3 (Located Northwesterly of the
intersection of North General Kearny Road at Nicolas Road)
RECOMMENDATION:
10.1 Accept the Public Improvements in Tract No. 27827-3;
R:~Agenda\061097 4
11
12
13
10.2
Authorize release of Faithful Performance Street and Water and Sewer System Bond
amounts, release of the Subdivision Monumentation Bond, and initiation of the
warranty period;
10.3 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Surety.
Acceptance of Public Streets into the City-Maintained Street System (Within Tract No.
27827-3) (Located Northwesterly of the intersection of Nicolas Road at North General
Kearny Road)
RECOMMENDATION:
11.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 97-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFOHNIA,
ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY-MAINTAINED STREET
SYSTEM {WITHIN TRACT NO. 27827-3)
"All-Way Stop" - Calle Halcon at Elinda Road
RECOMMENDATION:
12.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 97-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ESTABLISHING "ALL-WAY STOP" LOCATION ON CALLE HALCON AND ELINDA
ROAD
"No Parking" Zones on Rancho California Road, Winchester Road, Pala Road, Santiago
Road, Pauba Road and Rancho Vista Road
RECOMMENDATION:
13.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 97-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ESTABLISHING "NO PARKING" ZONES ON RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD,
WINCHESTER ROAD, PALA ROAD, SANTIAGO ROAD, PAUBA ROAD AND
RANCHO VISTA ROAD AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT "A"
R:~Agenda\061097 5
14
15
16
17
Award of Construction Contract for Installation of an Interim Traffic Signal at State Route
79 South and Bedford Court
RECOMMENDATION:
14.1
Award a contract for installation of an interim traffic signal at State Route 79 South
and Bedford Court, Project No. PW96-17 to DBX, Inc. in the amount of $89,121.00
and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract.
14.2 Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency
amount of $8,912.10 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount.
SB 312 - Adding Division 26 to the Water Code Relating to Financing a Flood Control and
Prevention Program - Flood Prevention Bond Act of 1998
RECOMMENDATION:
15.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 97-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA SUPPORTING
SB 312 - ADDING DIVISION 26 TO THE WATER CODE (COMMENCING WITH
SECTION 79000) FLOOD PREVENTION BOND ACT OF 1998
Award a Professional Services Agreement to Urban Design Studio to prepare the Southside
Specific Plan
RECOMMENDATION:
16.1
Award a Professional Services Agreement in the amount of $61,700.00 to Urban
Design Studio to prepare the Southside Specific Plan and authorize the City Manager
to execute the agreement.
Authorization to Execute Agreements for the Use of 1997-98 Fiscal Year Community
Development Block Grant Funds
RECOMMENDATION:
17.1 Authorize the Mayor to execute the Supplemental Agreements for the 1997-98
Fiscal Year Community Development Block Grant Funds.
17.2
Authorize the City Manager to execute Sub-Recipient Agreements with the
Emergency Food and Aid Program (Senior Center), the Parent Center, and Valley
Intervention Program for Tots (VIP Tots) for administration of the 1997-98 Fiscal
Year Community Development Block Grant Funds,
R:\Agen~a~061097 6
18
Second Reading of Ordinance No. 97-10
RECOMMENDATION:
18.1 Adopt an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 97-10
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT OF
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 5 BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND
BRAMALEA CALIFORNIA, LLC FOR TM 23100, 23101, 23103 AND TPM 28503,
WITHIN SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 199 (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0030)
RECESS CITY COUNCIL MEETING FOR TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING
AND THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT MEETING
R:\Agen~a~061097 7
TEMECULA COMMUNITY.SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. CSD 97-01
Resolution: No. CSD 97-07
CALL TO ORDER: President Jeffrey E. Stone
ROLL CALL: DIRECTORS:
Birdsall, Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, Stone
PUBLIC COMMENT:
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Board of
Directors on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Spsakers
are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Board of Directors on an
item no1; listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form
should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk
before the Board of Directors gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for
individual speakers.
Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors, should present a completed pink "Request to
Speak" form to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and sta_te your
name and address for the record.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of May 27, 1997.
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT - Nelson
GENERAL MANAGERS REPORT - Bradley
BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT: Next meeting: June 24, 1997, 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 43200
Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
R:\Agenda~061097 8
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENTAGENCY'MEETING
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. RDA 97-01
~' Resolution: No. RDA 97-04
CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Steven J. Ford presiding
ROLL CALL:
AGENCY MEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Roberts, Stone, Ford
PUBLIC COMMENT:
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Redevelopment
Agency on it.~ms that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers
are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Agency on an item not
listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should
be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk
before the Agency gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual
speakers.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of May 27, 1997.
Contract Amendment No. 3, Project No. PW95-07. Professional Services with Trans-Pacific
Consultants, Inc. for the Design of Phase I and Phase II of the Western Bypass Corridor,
Purchase Order 17136
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1
Approve Contract Amendment No. 3 and authorize Chairperson to execute the
Amendment between the City and Trans-Pacific Consultants, Inc. in the amount of
$60,935.00 brining the total contract amount to $552,203.60. The Agreement will
be subject to the approval of the Executive Director and the General Counsel as to
final form.
R:\Agenda~061097 9
3 Award of a Professional Services Contract to Westcott and McGregor and Associates for
Property Management of the Sherwood and Pujol Apartments
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Award a Professional Services Contract in the amount of $1,600 per month to
West~tt and McGregor and Associates for property management, operation and
maintenance of the Sherwood and Pujol Apartments.
3.2 Authorize RDA Chairperson to Execute Contract.
AGENCY BUSINESS
4 FY 1997/98 Economic Development Strategic Plan
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Review the FY 1997/98 Economic Development Strategic Plan update;
4.2 Review and approve the FY 1997/98 Marketing Plan;
4.3 Review and provide direction regarding the funding request of the Temecula Valley
Chamber of Commerce, Temecula Valley Economic Development Corporation and
the Temecula Valley Film Council.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
AGENCY MEMBER'S REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: June 24, 1997, 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business
Park Drive, Temecula, California.
R:~Agenda\061097 10
RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before a public
hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of
the project(s) at-the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court,
you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the
public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior
to, the public hearing.
19
Appeal of the Planning Commission's Approval of Planning Application No. PA96-0345
(Development Plan) - Shell Automobile Service Station, Car Wash, Convenience Mart, and a
Kentucky Fried Chicken Fast Food Restaurant, at the Southwest Corner of Margarita Road
and Yukon. within the Palomar Village Shopping Center
RECOMMENDATION:
19.1 Adopt the Negative Declaration for Planning Application No. PA96-0345;
19.2 Adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for Planning Application No. PA96-0345;
19.3 Adopt a resolution entitled.:
RESOLUTION NO. 97-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 96-0345 (DEVELOPMENT PLAN - APPEAL),
UPHOLDING THE PLANNING COMMISSlON'S DECISION TO APPROVE PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. PA96-0345 (DEVELOPMENT PLAN) TO DESIGN AND
CONSTRUCT A 648 SQUARE FOOT AUTOMATED CAR WASH, A 875 SQUARE
FOOT CONVENIENCE MART (WITHOUT ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE SALES), AND A
1,645 SQUARE FOOT FAST FOOD RESTAURANT WITH DRIVE-THROUGH SERVICE
ON 0.794 ACRES LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF MARGARITA
ROAD AND YUKON, WITHIN THE PALOMAR VILLAGE SHOPPING CENTER, AND
KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 921-700-017
COUNCIL BUSINESS
20 Planning Commission Appointments
RECOMMENDATION:
20.1 Appoint two applicants to serve a full three-year term on the Planning Commission.
R:tAgenda\061097 11
21 Prima Facie Speed Limits on Certain Streets
RECOMMENDATION:
21.1 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 97-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, AMENDING
SECTION 10.28.010(d) OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING PRIMA
FACIE SPEED LIMIT ON 1) WINCHESTER ROAD BETWEEN JEFFERSON AVENUE
AND DIAZ ROAD 2) PAUBA ROAD BETWEEN YNEZ ROAD AND MEADOWS
PARKWAY 3) DIAZ ROAD BETWEEN RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AND
WINCHESTER ROAD 4) RANCHO VISTA ROAD BETWEEN YNEZ ROAD AND
MEADOWS PARKWAY
22
Request for Annexation of Redhawk by the Redhawk Residents to the City of Temecula
and the Temecula Community Services District ITCSD)
RECOMMENDATION:
22.1
Provide direction to staff regarding the annexation for Redhawk and Vail Ranch
communities, and if appropriate waive City pre-zoning, annexation and CEQA fees,
and to pay all Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) annexation fees.
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: June 24, 1997, 7:00 PM, City Council Char~bers, 43200 Business Park
Drive, Temecula, California.
R:~Agenda\061097 12
'PROCLAMATIONS/
PRESENTATIONS
City of
PROCLAMATION
WHEREAS, J~me~ M. Wright h~ b~ a Ri. er~i~ C. oun~ fibfighter for mo~
20 year~;
WHISREAS, Chief WriSt served as the City's Division Chief under the terms
of the City of Temecula's Fire Services Contract, Operations Chief for the Riverside
County Fire Department, and Acting Riverside County Fire Chief; and
WHEREAS, Chief WriSt performed all of these duties with a high
de~ree of professionalism and enthuaiaam; and
WHEREAS, J~-,e, M. Wright has recendy been promoted to the po~itio,~ of
Chief of the Riverside County Fire Department;
NOW, TI-~REFORE, I, Patricia H. Birdsall, on behalf of the City Council
of the City of Temecula, extend our congratulations and wish continued success to
Riverside County Fire Chief James M. Wright in his new position.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal
of the City of Temecula to be affixed this 10th &y of June, 1997.
Patricia H. Bi~all,
Mayor
June S. Greek, CMC
City Clerk
Presented in appreciation and gratitude on behalf of the
citizens of the City of Temecula
To~
This expression of the eommunity's esteem serves to acknowledge the Noon Rotary's
instrumental role in enabling the City of Temecula to acquire the CairnsIRIS Helmet.
Your fundraising efforts towards the purchase of this mounted thermal imaging system are
deeply appreciated. 'Because of your dedication to this endeavor, the capability to expedite
rescues in a smoke-filled environment became a reality. The citizens of Temecula, the
Temecula Fire Department, and the City Council wish to thank you for your benevolence
and consideration.
'In V¥itness Whereof, ][ have hereunto affixed my
hand and official seal this 10th day of June,
1997.
Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor
June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk
Cerfificate Apprecia6on
Presented in appreciation and gratitude on behalf of the
citizens of the City of Temecula
To.'
This expression of the community's esteem serves to acknowledge your insight and
inspiration in bringing the CairnsIPd$ ,Helmet to the City's attention. Your generous
~.ontribution of $5,000.00 towards the purchase of the ]Helmet is deeply appreciated.
Because of your resourcefulness and perception in realizing that the City of Temecula
would benefit greatly by acquiring the mounted ther,,,al ima~,,g system, the capability to
expedite rescues in a smoke-filled environment became a reality. The citizens of
Temecula, the Temecula Fire Depart,nent, and the City Council wish to thank you for
your generosity and concern.
In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto affized my
hand and official seal this 1Oth day of $une,
1997.
Patricia ,H. Birdsall, N[ayor
$une S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk
ITEM' 1
ITEM 2
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
HELD MAY 13, 1997
EXECUTIVE SESSION
A meeting of the City of Temecula City Council was called to order at 5:37 PM. It was moved by
Councilmember Stone, seconded by Councilmember Ford to adjourn to Executive Session at 5:37
PM, pursuant to Government Code Sections:
1. §54957.6, Conference with City's Labor Negotiator, Grant Yates.
2. §54956.8, Conference with Real Property Negotiator, Property: 27600 Jefferson Avenue;
Negotiating Parties: Norm Reeves Super Group and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of
Temecula; Under negotiation: Consideration of lease terms.
3. §54956.9(a), Pending Litigation:
a. Strachota Insurance Agency v. City of Temecula, et al.
b. Stratego v. City of Temecula, et al.
c. Zonos v. City of Temecula, et al.
4. §54956.9(b), Whether to initiate litigation, one matter.
The motion was unanimously carried. The Executive Session was adjourned at 7:10 PM.
A regular meeting of the Temecula City Council was called to order at 7:11 PM at the City Council
Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Mayor Birdsall presiding.
PRESENT: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, Stone, Birdsall
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
None
Also present were City Manager Ronald Bradley, City Attorney Peter M. Thorson, and Deputy City
Clerk Susan Jones.
PRELUDE MUSIC
The prelude and intermission music was provided by Kurt Jordan.
INVOCATION
The invocation was given by Pastor James Field, First Baptist Church of Temecula.
R:\Agenda~051397 1
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The audience was led in the flag salute by Mayor Pro Tem Roberts.
PROCLAMATIONS/PRESENTATIONS
Mayor Birdsall proclaimed May 14, 1997, as Transit Appreciation Day
CITY ATTORNEY REPORT
City Attorney Thorson stated the City Council did not discuss Item No. 2 and on Item 1, the City
Council met with Mr. Grant Yates, but there is no final action to report, and in accordance with the
provisions of the Brown Act, there is nothing else to report from Closed Session.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
Art Pelke, 43185 Margarita Road, extended appreciation to the Council from many Temecula
organizations for prohibiting alcoholic and tobacco sales at the proposed Pauba and Margarita
Roads strip mall.
Don Jenkins, 30315 Rogue Circle, thanked the City Council for their support in helping to defray
the expenses for Sean McClintock, who was injured in a bicycle accident while on a scouting trip.
Mr. Jenkins announced a Bike-a-Thon, tentatively scheduled for August 23, 1997, to help defray
medical expenses for injured bicyclists with inadequate medical coverage. Sean McClintock also
expressed his thanks to the various Temecula and Murrieta businesses for their support.
Kenneth Ray, 31647 Pio Pico Road, asked the City Council to make a comprehensive review of the
general plan with the build-out capped at a reasonable number.
Chuck Washington, Councilmember, City of Murrieta, urged support of a resolution adopting a
restructuring of the Riverside County Transportation Commission.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Mayor Pro Tern Roberts asked that the Notice of Hearing signs at Pauba Road and Margarita Road
be removed immediately.
Mayor Birdsall asked the City Attorney if she could participate in Item 25, as she had watched the
video and listened to the audio tapes of the May 8, 1997 workshop. City Attorney Thorson replied
she could participate.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Mayor Pro Tern Roberts requested the removal of Item 5 from the Consent Calendar and asked
staff to research if the Old Town Main Street Billboard Association was double billed.
R:\Agenda\051397 2
Councilmember Ford requested the removal of Item 18 from the Consent Calendar.
It was moved by Councilmember Stone, and seconded by Councilmember Lindemans to approve
Consent Calendar Items 1-4, 6-17 and 19-21.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, Stone, Birdsall
NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
1 Standard Ordinance Adoption Procedure
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in
the agenda.
2 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve the minutes of April 8, 1997.
2.2 Approve the minutes of April 22, 1997.
Resolution ADoroving List of Demands
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 97-41
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING
CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
Citv Treasurer's Report as of March 31. 1997
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Receive and file the City Treasurer's Report as of March 31, 1997.
3
4
R:\Agencla\051397 3
6
7
8
Authorize Access to Parcel 1 in Parcel Map No. 21451 from Santiago Road
(Located on the Northerly side of Santiago Road Westerly of Margarita Road)
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1
Approve a new driveway location access opening fronting on Santiago Road
Westerly of Margarita Road;
6.2
Authorize the City Engineer to approve the specific location, subject to the
preparation of an agreement wherein the applicants shall cluitclaim their rights in an
offsite access opening, and shall agree to physically close their existing driveway.
Agreement shall be satisfactory to the City Engineer and City Attorney prior to
recordation of the agreement.
Release Faithful Performance Warranty, and Labor and Materials Bonds in Tract No. 20703-
_2 (Located Easterly of the intersection of Roripaugh Road at Winchester Road)
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1
Authorize the release of Faithful Performance Warranty and Labor and Materials
Bonds for Street, Water and Sewer Improvements in Tract No. 20703-2;
7.2
Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, the
Developer and Surety.
Release Faithful Performance Warranty and Labor and Material Bonds in Tract No. 20703-3
(Located Southeasterly of Winchester Road and Southwesterly of Nicolas Road)
RECOMMENDATION:
8.1
Authorize release of the Faithful Performance Warranty Bond Riders and Labor and
Material Bonds for Public Improvements in Tract No. 20703-3;
8.2
Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, the
Developer and Surety.
Accept Public Improvements in Tract No. 21675-6 (Located Southwesterly of the
intersection of Meadows Parkway at Rancho Vista Road)
RECOMMENDATION:
9.1 Accept the Public Improvements in Tract No. 21675-6;
9.2
Authorize the initiation of the one-year warranty period, reduction of the Faithful
Performance Street, Drainage, Water, and Sewer security amounts, and release of
the Subdivision Monument security;
R:~Agencla\051397 4
10
11
12
9.3
Accept substitute securities for Faithful Performance Warranty and Labor and
Materials;
9.4 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Sureties.
Accept Public Improvements in Tract No. 21675-F (Located Southwesterly of the
intersection of Meadows Parkway at Rancho Vista Road)
RECOMMENDATION:
10.1 Accept the Public Improvements in Tract No. 21675-F;
10.2
Authorize the initiation of the one-year warranty period, reduction of the Faithful
Performance Street, Water, and Sewer security amounts to warranty level, and
release of the Subdivision Monument Bond;
10.3 Accept substitute securities for Faithful Performance Warranty and Labor and
Materials;
10.4 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Sureties.
Release Faithful Performance Warranty and Labor and Material Bonds in Tract No. 22962
(Located Southeasterly of Winchester Road and Southwesterly of Nicolas Road)
RECOMMENDATION:
11.1
Authorize release of the Faithful Performance Warranty Bond riders and Labor and
Material Bonds for Street, Drainage, Water, and Sewer Improvements in Tract No.
22962;
11.2 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, the
Developer and Surety.
Substitute Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Public Improvement Securities in Tract
No. 23142 (Located Northeasterly of the intersection of Meadows Parkway at Rancho
California Road)
RECOMMENDATION:
12.1
Accept the substitute Subdivision Improvement Agreement, and Faithful
Performance, Labor, and Materials securities for Street, Drainage, Water and Sewer
Improvements, and Subdivision Monumentation in Tract No. 23142;
12.2 Authorize the release of the Faithful Performance and Labor and Materials securities
on file;
12.3 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Sureties.
R:\Agen(ta\051397 5
13
14
15
Substitute Subdivision Improvement Acjreement and Public Imorovement Bonds in Tract No.
23992 (Located Southerly of the intersection of Rancho California Road at Ynez Road)
RECOMMENDATION:
13.1 Accept the substitute Subdivision Improvement Agreement, and Faithful
Performance, Labor, and Material Bonds for Street, Drainage, Water and Sewer
System improvements, and Subdivision Monumentation and Traffic Signalization
Mitigation Bonds in Tract No. 23992;
13.2 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Developers and Sureties.
Acceptance of the Grant of a Drainage Easement over a Portion of Parcel 1 of Parcel Mal~
No. 22554, abutting Tract No. 20879-F (Located north of Rancho California Road and east
of Meadows Parkway)
RECOMMENDATION:
14.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 97-42
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING
THE GRANT OF A STORM DRAINAGE EASEMENT OVER A PORTION OF PARCEL 1
OF PARCEL MAP NO. 22554, ABUTTING TRACT NO. 20879-F
Acceptance of Public Streets into the CitvoMaintained Street System (Within Tracts No.
21675-5 and 21675-F (Located Westerly of the intersection of Rancho Vista Road at
Meadows Parkway)
RECOMMENDATION:
15.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 97-43
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING
CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY-MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM, (WITHIN
TRACTS NO. 21675-6 AND 21675-F)
R:\Agenda~051397 6
16
17
19
Award of Construction Contract for the FY96-97 Street StriDing Program. Proiect No.
PW97-01
RECOMMENDATION:
16.1
16.2
Award a contract for Project No. PW97-01, FY96-97 Street Striping Program, to
Pacific Striping, Inc. for $76,685.00 and authorize the Mayor to execute the
contract.
Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency
amount of $7,668.50, which is equal to 10% of the contract amount.
Amendment to the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement Creating the Riverside Countv
Habitat Conservation Agency
RECOMMENDATION:
17.1 Approve an Amendment to the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement creating the
Riverside County Habitat Conservation Agency.
Second Reading of Ordinance No. 97-05
RECOMMENDATION:
19.1 Adopt an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 97-05
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, AMENDING
SECTION 10.28.010{d) OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING THE
PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT ON (1) YNEZ ROAD BETWEEN RANCHO CALIFORNIA
ROAD AND WINCHESTER ROAD, (2) DEL REY ROAD AND VIA NORTE, (3) MORAGA
ROAD BETWEEN RANCHO CALIFORNIA AND MARGARITA ROAD, {4) MARGARITA
ROAD BETWEEN RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AND STATE ROUTE 79 SOUTH,
JEFFERSON AVENUE BETWEEN WINCHESTER ROAD AND NORTH CITY LIMITS
R:\Agenda\051397 7
20 Second Reading of Ordinance No. 97-06
21
5
RECOMMENDATION:
20.1 Adopt an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 97-06
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING
CHAPTER 17 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE AND THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC
PLAN TO MAKE CHANGES TO TABLE 17.08(a1 OF THE DEVELOPMENT CODE AND
TABLE 1 OF THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN TO ALLOW 'FORTUNE TELLING, OR
SIMILAR ACTIVITY' AS PERMITTED USES RATHER THAN CONDITIONALLY
PERMITTED USES
Second Reading of Ordinance No. 97-07
RECOMMENDATION:
21.1 Adopt an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 97-07
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADDING
CHAPTER 9.14 TO THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE, PROHIBITING THE
CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND POSSESSION OF OPEN
CONTAINERS OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES IN PUBLIC PLACES, AND SECTION
9.02.010, PROHIBITING ENGAGING IN CERTAIN BODILY FUNCTIONS IN CERTAIN
PUBLIC AND PRIVATE PLACES, AND AMENDING SECTION 12.04.210 OF THE
TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOLIC
BEVERAGES IN CITY PARKS AND FACILITIES
Authorize Access to Lot 28 in Tract No. 9833-1 from Margarita Road
(Located on the Westerly side of Margarita Road Southerly of Pio Pico Road)
Director of Public Works Joseph Kicak presented the staff report.
Mayor Pro Tem Roberts stated his opposition based on the driveway location.
Mayor Birdsall inquired about moving the driveway further up on the property.
R:~Agenda\051397 8
18
It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Roberts, and seconded by Councilmember Stone to
approve staff's recommendation with the modification to relocate access as far north as
possible, adjacent to the channel, and to restrict the northerly landscaping on Margarita
Road to a low level or set back from curb face to increase sight distance.
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1
Authorize driveway access to Lot 28 in Tract No. 9833-1 from Margarita Road by
permitting an exception to the abutters access rights dedicated to and accepted by
the Riverside County Board of Supervisors' approval of the final Tract Map;
5.2
Authorize the City Engineer to approve the specific location, subject to the
preparation of an agreement wherein the applicants shall quitclaim their rights to
access from Pio Pico Road. Agreement shall be satisfactory to the City Engineer and
City Attorney prior to recordation of the agreement.
The motion was unanimously carried.
Official Pageant Recognition
Assistant City Manager Mary Jane McLarney presented the staff report and introduced Alice
Sullivan, Director of the Chamber of Commerce. Ms. Sullivan reported on activities in which
the representatives participate.
Councilmember Lindemans inquired into any liability issues. City Attorney Thorson stated
their activities as representatives will be handled in the same manner as other Parks and
Recreation projects.
It was moved by Councilmember Stone, and seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Roberts to
approve staff's recommendation.
18.1 Recognize the Temecula Valley Pageant Title Holders as Official Representatives of
the City of Temecula.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES:
4 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Ford, Stone, Roberts, Birdsall
NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
None
ABSTAIN: I COUNCILMEMBERS: Linderoans
R:\Agencla\051397 9
JOINT MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL, TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY,
OLD TOWN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY
AND THE OLD TOWN WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY
Chairperson Steven J. Ford called the Temecula Redevelopment Agency to order; Chairperson
Karel F. Linderoans called the Old Town Community Facilities District Financing Authority and the
Old Town Westside Improvement Authority to order at 7:47 PM.
Agency Member Stone stepped down due to conflict of interest.
PUBLIC HEARING
1 AB 1290 Redevelooment Im!;)lementstion Plen Status Report
Senior Planner John Meyer presented the staff report.
Streetscape Improvements Maintenance Costs
Director Birdsall asked about the location of the wooden sidewalks and if the $100,000
annual cost included maintenance of the restrooms and trash. Mr. Meyer replied the
wooden sidewalks will run along Front Street from 6th Street to Santiago Road and the cost
for maintenance is included.
Director Birdsall suggested the City allocate the funds from the City's budget for the first
year.
It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Director Roberts to include, upon
project completion, the streetscape improvements maintenance costs in the City's budget as
a line item, to be reviewed on an annual basis.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 4 DIRECTORS: Birdsall, Lindemarts, Roberts, Ford
NOES: 0 DIRECTORS: None
ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None
ABSTAIN: 1 DIRECTORS: Stone
Facade Improvement Prooram
Director Birdsall clarified this program is exempt from prevailing wages.
R:~Agenda\051397 10
It was moved by Director Lindemans, and seconded by Director Birdsall to approve staff
recommendation as follows:
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1
Add a $10,000 Assistance Package, from now through June 31, 1998. The terms
of the package would be a $5,000 grant with a $5,000 loan forgiven at the end of
five years. Staff recommends that applicants be encouraged to use the loan, rebate,
and assistance programs concurrently. Staff also recommends that the terms of the
rebate program be modified to allow direct payment to the contractor similar to our
Residential Rehab Programs.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 4 DIRECTORS:
Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, Birdsall
NOES: 0 DIRECTORS: None
ABSTAIN: I DIRECTORS: Stone
Streetscape Construction Mitigation Program
It was moved by Director Lindemans, and seconded by Director Birdsall to approve staff
recommendation as follows:
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Direct staff to develop a mitigation program which will assist the Old Town
Merchants to mitigate some of the temporary adverse impacts that are expected to
be experienced during the construction period.
The motion was carried with Director Stone abstaining.
Redevelopment Small Business Commercial Rehabilitation Loan Program
It was moved by Director Lindemans, seconded by Director Birdsall to approve staff
recommendation to eliminate this program.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES:
4 AGENCY MEMBERS:
Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, Birdsall
NOES: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None
ABSTAIN: 1 AGENCY MEMBERS: Stone
R:~Agenda\051397 11
AGENCY/AUTHORITY BUSINESS
2 Old Town Temecula Entertainment Proiect. Termination of Owner Participation Agreement.
Fluor Daniel Construction Management A0reement. and Old Town/Westside Community
Facilities District No. 1
It was moved by Director Linderoans, and seconded by Director Birdsall to approve staff
recommendation 2.1.
2.1 That the Redevelopment Agency adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 97-01
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
TERMINATING THAT CERTAIN 'OWNER PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT BY AND
BETWEEN THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND
T.Z.B.G., INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION," DATED AUGUST 31, 1995, AS
AMENDED MARCH 25, 1996
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 4 AGENCY MEMBERS: Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, Birdsall
NOES: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None
ABSTAIN: 1 AGENCY MEMBERS: Stone
It was moved by Director Lindemans, and seconded by Director Birdsall to approve staff
recommendation 2.2.
2.2 That the Old Town Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority adopt
a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. FA 97-01
A RESOLUTION OF THE OLD TOWN/WESTSlDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT
FINANCING AUTHORITY TERMINATING THAT CERTAIN "CONSTRUCTION
MANAGEMENT AND SUPERVISION AGREEMENT," DATED NOVEMBER 26, 1996
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 4 AGENCY MEMBERS:
NOES: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS:
Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, Birdsall
None
R:\Agenda\051397 12
ABSTAIN: 1 AGENCY MEMBERS: Stone
It was moved by Director Linderoans, and seconded by Director Birdsall to approve staff
recommendation 2.3.
2.3
That the Old Town Westside Community Facilities District Financing Authority read
by title only and introduce an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. FA 97-01
AN ORDINANCE OF THE OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT
FINANCING AUTHORITY DISSOLVING THE OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT
NO. I (OLD TOWN AREA PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS)
The motion carried as follows:
AYES:
4 AGENCY MEMBERS:
Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, Birdsall
NOES: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None
ABSTAIN: 1 AGENCY MEMBERS: Stone
Chairperson Ford recessed the Joint Meeting of the City Council, Temecula Redevelopment, Old
Town/Westside Community facilities District Financing Authority and the Old Town/Westside
Improvement Authority meeting.
Mayor Birdsall called a recess at 8:19 PM and reconvened the meeting at 8:33 PM.
Mayor Birdsall called a recess at 8:33 PM to accommodate the scheduled Community Services
District, Temecula Redevelopment Agency, Old Town Westside Community Facilities District
Financing Authority, and Old Town Westside Improvement Authority meetings. The meeting was
reconvened at 8:52 PM.
COUNCIL BUSINESS
22 TCI Cable Presentation
Kathy Olett, local manager of TCI Cable, provided an update of TCI operations, future
plans, and a rate increase effective June 1, 1997. She introduced Teri Scott, Director of
Governmental Affairs, and Stacy Kelly, Director of Regulatory Affairs. Ms. Scott reported
programming and service decisions will now be made at the local level.
Commissioner Ford asked how local channels and different programming could be added.
Ms. Olett stated existing contracts with affiliates, band width capacities, and survey data
determine programming.
R;~Agenda\051397 13
23
24
25
Mayor Pro Tem Roberts stated he has noticed improvement and commented his concern is
receiving at least one San Diego station.
Barbara Nolan, 27430 Senna Court, expressed her displeasure with TCI's service and
programming selections and asked the Council to consider alternatives to TCI.
Mayor Birdsall received and filed the report.
Prima Facia Speed Limits on Certain Streets - Mira Loma Drive North of Rancho Vista Road.
Cabrillo Avenue between Jedediah Smith Road and Vallejo Avenue
Director of Public Works Joseph Kicak presented the staff report.
It was moved by Councilmember Lindemans, and seconded by Councilmember Stone to
approve staff recommendation as follows:
23.1 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 97-08
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, AMENDING
SECTION 10.28.010{d) OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING PRIMA
FACIE SPEED LIMIT ON (1) MIRA LOMA DRIVE NORTH OF RANCHO VISTA ROAD
{2) CABRILLO AVENUE BETWEEN JEDEDIAH SMITH ROAD AND VALLEJO AVENUE
The motion was unanimously carried.
Proposed Reorganization of RCTC
Mayor Pro Tam Roberts presented the staff report.
It was moved by Mayor Pro Tam Roberts, seconded by Councilmember Stone to approve
staff recommendation as follows:
24.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 97-44
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ENDORSING
THE REORGANIZATION OF THE MEMBERSHIP OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY
TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
The motion was unanimously carried.
Development Impact Fees
City Manager Ronald Bradley presented the staff report.
R:~Agenda\051397 14
Mayor Birdsall announced she had reviewed the video tapes and listened to the audio tapes
of the May 8, 1997 workshop.
Mayor Birdsall opened the public hearing at 9:30 PM.
Kenneth Ray, 31647 Pio Pico Road, asked the Council to reconsider and approve staff's
recommended DIF fees.
Cecelia Axton, 30169 Sierra Madre Drive, spoke in favor of staff's recommended fees.
Monte McLain, 36147 Vence Drive, Murrieta, opposed reducing development impact fees
below staff's recommendation.
Gordon Greer, 45077 Putting Green Court, spoke in favor of staff's recommended fee
structure.
George Buhler, 40265 Paseo Sereno, asked the Council to follow staff's recommended fees.
Sam Pratt, 40470 Brixton Cove, expressed his support of staff's recommendation regarding
impact fees.
David Michael, 30300 Churchill Court, stated developers must pay for the infrastructure
costs required by their businesses.
AI Theurich, 30533 Bridgeview Circle, stated the creation of jobs will increase traffic
problems, if proper mitigation does not take place.
Bob Johnston, 29760 Valle Verde, requested Council reconsider their decision to reduce DIF
fees.
Gartwood Lacour, 40680 Calle Madero, stated his opposition to lowering staff's
recommended DIF fees.
Bill Dendy, 41975 Winchester Road, representing Westside Business Center, stated his
support of the Council's fee structure approved at the May 8, 1997 meeting.
Lon Brusegard, 42075 Avenida Alvarado, representing Southwest Riverside County
Manufacturer's Council, stated jobs are not antiproductive because even though the
employees may live outside the area, they use various local businesses. He expressed the
real need is for a north/south corridor - i.e., Diaz Road expansion.
Michael Naggar, 43034 Agena Street, stated his opposition to lowering DIF fees.
It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Roberts, and seconded by Councilmember Stone to extend the
meeting for one hour.
Mayor Birdsall closed the public hearing at 10:19 PM.
R:\Agencla\O51397 15
Mayor Birdsall called a recess at 10:19 PM and reconvened the meeting at 10:19 PM.
Councilmember Stone expressed his concern over too many projects and not enough
revenue and believes the fees are too low as the Council has the developmental fee
reduction capability to create incentives to bring jobs, which also bring property and sale tax
revenue, into this community.
Mayor Pro Tern Roberts displayed SCAG projections showing projected Temecula population
increasing by 18% by 2020, and employment, 12% while Orange County employment
increases substantially. He mentioned a Vehicle Tax is being considered because of gas tax
loss which will effect the 62.8% of people living in Temecula who commute.
It was moved by Councilmember Stone, and seconded by Councilmember Ford, to extend the
meeting to 11:30 PM. The motion was carried with Councilmember Lindemans voting no.
It was moved by Councilmember Lindemans, and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Roberts to
approve staff's recommendation of the proposed fee to be phased in over a seven (7) year
period; the fee will be adjust ed July I of each year after staff has provided an analysis of
development which has occurred and the amount of fees collected to determine appropriate
fees for the next fiscal year.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES:
4 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, Birdsall
NOES: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Stone
ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
None
It was moved by Councilmember Lindemans, and seconded by Councilmember Ford to
include the sphere of influence and the residential fee will be adopted at 100% of the
maximum fee recommended by the study.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, Birdsall
NOES: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Stone
ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
R:~Agenda~051397 16
25.1
Read by title only and introduce an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 97-08
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING
TITLE 15 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING A NEW CHAPTER
ENTITLED 'PUBLIC FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE'
25.2
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 97-45
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING
AND IMPOSING A PUBLIC FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, Birdsall
NOES: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Stone
ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Mr. Bradley stated with the adoption of the residential fees, it is still intended to give up to 50%
credit for development of private parks.
Mayor Pro Tem Roberts asked if staff has a recommended definition for a qualified non-
profit organization. Mr. Bradley replied that issue is taking time to research and will be
brought back at a later date. Assistant City Attorney Reuben Weiner stated if a non profit
organization constructed a non-residential building they would not pay fee until the property
is transferred to a for-profit organization.
Mayor Birdsall questioned how the 70 plus people who have paid $10,000 will be handled.
Mr. Bradley responded staff will come back to the Council with a recommendation.
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
None given.
CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT
None given.
R:~A§encla\051397 17
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Councilmember Ford to adjourn at 11:16 PM
to a meeting on May 27, 1997, 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive,
Temecula, California and a CIP Workshop will be held June 3, 1997, 6:30 PM, City Council
Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. The motion was unanimously carried.
ATTEST:
Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor
June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk
R:\Agendat051397 18
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
HELD MAY 27, 1997
EXECUTIVE SESSION
A meeting of the Temecula City Council was called to order at 5:30 PM. It was moved by
Councilmember Stone, seconded by Councilmember Ford, to adjourn to Executive Session at
5:30 PM, pursuant to Government Code Sections:
1. §54957.6, Conference with City's Labor Negotiator, Grant Yates.
2. §54956.8, Conference with Real Property Negotiator, Property: 3.09 acres located at the
northwesterly corner of La Paz Road and State Route 79, APN 922-190-25; Negotiating Parties:
Mike Moramarco, County of Riverside and the City of Temecula; Under negotiation: price and
terms of payment.
3. §54956.8, Conference with Real Property Negotiator, Property: 27600 Jefferson Avenue;
Negotiating Parties: Norm Reeves Super Group and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of
Temecula; Under negotiation: Consideration of lease terms.
The motion was unanimously carried. The Executive Session was adjourned at 7:10 PM.
A regular meeting of the Temecula City Council was called or order at 7:13 PM at the City Council
Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
PRESENT: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Mayor Birdsall presiding.
Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, Stone,
Birdsall
None
Also present were City Manager Ronald Bradley, City Attorney Peter M. Thorson, and Deputy City
Clerk Susan W. Jones.
PRELUDE MUSIC
The prelude and intermission music was provided by Heather Downing.
INVOCATION
The invocation was given by Rabbi Josef Germain, Congregation B'Nai Chaim of Murrieta.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCF
The audience was led in the flag salute by Councilmember Stone.
CITY ATTORNEY REPORT
City Attorney Thorson stated in accordance with the provisions of the Brown Act, there was
nothing to report from Closed Session.
PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS:
Mayor Pro Tem Roberts presented Randall Holland, Vice President of the Arts Council, with a
proclamation declaring the week of June 1, 1997, to be "Arts Appreciation Week."
Mayor Birdsall proclaimed May 27, 1997, to be "World Trade Day."
Jim Morrisey, Director of the Inland Empire American Planning Association, presented Planning
Manager Debbie Ubnoske an award for the Planning Department's Fast Track Process.
Community Development Director Gary Thornhill also recognized Mary Jane McLarney, Tony Elmo,
Ron Parks, Annie Bostre-Le, Heida Osvold, Laura Cabral, Matthew Fagan, Carole Donahoe, an_d
Larry Cooley for their contribution in making the fast track process a success.
Mr. Morrisey presented the Temecula One Award (Operation Neighborhood Enrichment) to Senior
Planner John Meyer. Mr. Thornhill also thanked Mary Jane McLarney, Dave Haar, Mike
Teyechea, Mary Ann Salazar, Tony Elmo, Shawn Nelson, Irene Rogers, and All Moghadam.
Mr. Morrisey awarded Associate Planner Matthew Fagan the "Robert Street Memorial Award" for
his hard work, excellent skills and contribution to the Planning Department. Mr. Fagan expressed
his appreciation for the award and for the assistance and encouragement given him by his wife,
Planning Department staff members, the Planning Commission, and the City Council.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Terry Gilmore, 2685 Ynez Road, asked for donations and prayers for two-year old Allison Sanchez,
who has brain cancer and stated donations can be dropped off at Paradise Chevrolet, with checks
made payable to "People Helping People." Joanie Sanchez, Allison's mother, thanked the
community for their support and prayers and reported they will be going to Sacramento for surgery
to remove the remainder of the tumor.
Wayne Hall, 42131 Agena, reported many car dealerships are unloading cars in the median of
Ynez Road and requested proper enforcement of City codes.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Councilmember Stone discussed the massage ordinance which will be on the June 24, 1997
agenda and asked for Council support regarding active enforcement of the existing ordinance in
the areas of working hours, certification of employees, inspection of premises and apparel
requirements.
Councilmember Stone thanked Joe Kicak and the Public Works Department for the installation of
guard rail on the south side of Pauba Road.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Councilmember Roberts requested the removal of Item 4 from the Consent Calendar.
Councilmember Ford requested Item 14 be removed from the Consent Calendar.
It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Councilmember Linderoans, to approve
Consent Calendar Items 1-3, 5-13, and 15-20.
The motion carried as follows:
2
3
AYES: 5
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Standard Ordinance Adoorion Procedure
Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, Stone, Birdsall
None
None
1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in
the agenda.
Minutes
2.1 Approve the minutes of May B, 1997.
Resolution Approving List of Demands
3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 97-46
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING
CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
Accept Public Improvements in Tract No. 22716-2 (Located at the Northerly corner of the
intersection of Meadows Parkway at Rancho Vista Road)
5.1 Accept the Public Improvements in Tract No. 22716-2;
5.2 Authorize reduction in Faithful Performance Bond amount to the warranty level for
Street, Water, and Sewer Improvements, initiation on the one-year warranty period
and release of the Subdivision Monument Bond;
5.3 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Surety.
7
8
9
Accept Subdivision Monumentation in Tract No. 24134-1 (Located Southeasterly of the
intersection of Pauba Road at Margarita Road)
6.1 Accept the Subdivision Monumentation in Tract No. 24134-1;
6.2 Authorize release of the Subdivision Monumentation security;
6.3 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Surety.
Accept Public Improvements in Tract No. 22916-3 (Located at the Northwesterly corner of
the intersection of Pauba Road at Butterfield Stage Road)
7.1 Accept the Public Improvements in Tract No. 22916-3;
7.2 Authorize the initiation of the one-year warranty period, reduction of the Faithful
Performance Street and Drainage, and Water and Sewer security amounts, and
release of the Subdivision Monument security;
7.3 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Surety.
Amendment No. 1 to the Electrical Agreement for Maintenance of Sional and Lighting
Systems on State Highways
8.1 Approve an Amendment No. 1 to the Electrical Agreement for Maintenance of
Signal and Lighting Systems on State Highways with the State Department of
Transportation.
Acceptance of Public Street into the City-Maintained Street System (Within Tract No.
2271 6-23 (Located Northerly of the intersection of Meadows Parkway at Rancho Vista
Road)
9.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 97-47
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING
CERTAIN PUBLIC STREET INTO THE CITY-MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM (WITHIN
TRACT NO. 22716-2)
4
10
11
12
13
15
16
Acceptance of Public Streets into the City-Maintained Street System (Within Tract No,
22916-3) (Located at the Northwesterly corner of the intersection of Pauba Road at
Butterfield Stage Road)
10.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 97-48
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING
CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY-MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM
(WITHIN TRACT NO. 22916-3)
Acceptance of Sewer Easements Within Lots 27 and 28 - Tract No. 21067
(Located adjacent to Pala Road Community Park)
11.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 97-49
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING
THE GRANT OF SEWER EASEMENTS WITHIN LOTS 27 AND 28 OF TRACT NO.
21067
11.2 Authorize the City Clerk to record the Grant of Easement Documents.
Revisions to City of Temecula Travel Policy
12.1 Approve the revised City of Temecula Travel Policy.
Financial Statements for the Nine Months Ended March 31, 1997
13.1 Receive and file the Combining Balance Sheets as of March 31, 1997, the
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance, and the
Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Retained Earnings for the Nine
Months Ended March 31, 1997.
Contract Inspection Services for Building and Safety
15.1 Approve an additional payment in the amount of $11,21 5 to J.A.S. Pacific
Consulting Services, Inc., to provide building inspection services to the Building and
Safety Department.
Local Government Subvention Fund Match Program
16.1 Authorize projects proposed to be constructed using AB2766 Subvention Funds
Match {20%) and other funds provided by the City (80%);
17
18
19
2O
16.2 Commit the City to the Project Milestone Schedules reflected in the application
package;
16.3 Allocate AB2766 Subvention Funds and other funds to the proposed projects;
16.4 Authorize the Mayor to execute two {2) copies of the contract provided in the
application package.
Selection of Vendor and ADiDroDriation of Grant Funds
17.1 Appropriate $45,525 to purchase a command post trailer for Police Department use
from Universal Specialty Vehicles in Riverside, California.
David Turch and Associates
18.1 Retain the public advocacy firm of David Turch and Associates to assist the City in
pursuing federal funding opportunities for infrastructure needs.
Second Reading of Ordinance No. 97-08
19.1 Adopt an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 97-08
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, AMENDING
SECTION 10.28.010{d) OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING PRIMA
FAClE SPEED LIMIT ON {1) MIRA LOMA DRIVE NORTH OF RANCHO VISTA ROAD
{2) CABRILLO AVENUE BETWEEN JEDEDIAH SMITH ROAD AND VALLEJO AVENUE
Second Reading of Ordinance No. 97-09
20.1 Adopt an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 97-09
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING
TITLE 15 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING A NEW CHAPTER
ENTITLED 'PUBLIC FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE"
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Ford, Linderoans, Roberts, Birdsall
NOES: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Stone
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
4
14
Professional Services Contract with Canty Engineering Group. Inc.. for Design and
Construction Support Services for the Winchester Roadll-1 5 Interchange, Rancho California
Road/I-1 5 Interchange. and the Overland Overcrossing Bridge
Councilmember Roberts expressed concern with the selection of an engineering company
whose principals were involved with the previous contracted firm, and recommended
language regarding payment for additional services and authorization of additional work.
It was moved by Councilmember Roberts, seconded by Councilmember Stone, to approve
staff's recommendation with the following amendments: 1) Page 1, Section (b),
"Consultant shall be compensated for any additional services in the amounts and manner
as agreed to by the City Manager, the Council's Public Works Subcommittee and the
Consultant..."; and 2) "Any additional work shall be approved by the City Council."
4.1
Approve and authorize the Mayor to sign the Professional Services Agreement
between the City of Temecula and Canty Engineering Group, Inc. (CEG) to provide
engineering and construction support services for the Winchester Road/I-15
Interchange, Project No. PW95-21, Rancho California Road/I-15 Interchange, Project
No. PW95-12 and Overland Overcrossing Bridge, Project No. PW95-11, in an
amount not to exceed $54,000.00.
The motion was carried unanimously.
Award a Professional Services Agreement to Tom Dodson and Associates to Perform
Services to Administer and Implement the Mitigation Monitoring Programs for the Temecula
Regional Center Specific Plan Fnvironmental Imoact Report and the Campos Verdes
Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report
City Manager Bradley reported there was a question about the awarding of this contract
because of line items not identified on page 4 of a letter dated March 22, 1997, submitted
by the proposed consultant. He stated the wording, which was blacked out by staff
because it was not appropriate for this contract, reads, "Item 4 of the duties you identified
in the request address additional tasks which may be required. If requested, TDA can
provide a proposal to assist the City with securing an archeologist and/or a paleontologist
for monitoring activities Nos. 31 and 32." Mr. Bradley reiterated these contracts for the
regional shopping center and the middle school site are paid by Forest City and Countryside
Community Southwest; and both contracts must be in place before grading permits can be
pulled.
It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Councilmember Roberts, to approve
staff recommendation.
14.1
Award a Professional Services Agreement in the amount of $30,000 to Tom Dodson
and Associates to perform services to administer and implement the Mitigation
Monitoring Program for the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan Environmental
Impact Report and authorize the City Manager to sign the agreements after the
initial funding deposits have been made.
7
14.2
Award a Professional Services Agreement in the amount of $30,000 to Tom Dodson
and Associates to perform services to administer and implement the Mitigation
Monitoring Program for the Campos Verdes Specific Plan Environmental Impact
Report and authorize the City Manager to sign the agreements after the initial
funding deposits have been made.
The motion was unanimously passed.
JOINT MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL. TI=MECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
OLD TOWN COMMUNITY FAClLITIFS DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY
AND THF OLD TOWN WFSTSlDF IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY
A joint meeting of the City Council, the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, the Old Town
Community Facilities District Financing Authority and the Old Town Westside Improvement
Authority was called at 8:13 PM. Chairman Ford of the Temecula Redevelopment Agency
presiding.
Councilmember Stone stepped down due to a conflict of interest.
1 Financing for Old Town Area Public Improvements and the Western Bypass Corridor
It was moved by Mayor Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Roberts, to approve staff
recommendation.
1.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 97-50
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
TERMINATING THE OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT
FINANCING AUTHORITY AND THE OLD TOWN/WESTSlDE IMPROVEMENT
AUTHORITY
1.2 That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 97-51
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING
RESOLUTION NO. 96-55 TO ALLOW FOR IMMEDIATE ABANDONMENT OF
ASSESSMENT PROCEEDINGS
8
1.3
1.4
That the Redevelopment Agency adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 97-02
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
TERMINATING THE OLD TOWN/WESTSlDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT
FINANCING AUTHORITY AND THE OLD TOWN/WESTSlDE IMPROVEMENT
AUTHORITY
That the Board of Directors adopt an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. FA 97-01
AN ORDINANCE OF THE OLD T. OWN/WESTSlDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES
DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY DISSOLVING THE OLD TOWN/WESTSlDE
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1 (OLD TOWN AREA PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS)
The motion carried as follows:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
AYES: 4
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 0
ABSTAIN: 1
Birdsall, Lindemans, Roberts, Ford
None
None
Stone
It was moved by Mayor Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Roberts, to recess the Joint City
Council/Temecula Redevelopment Agency at 8:15 PM to accommodate the scheduled Community
Services District, Redevelopment Agency, Old Town/Westside Community Facilities District Financing
Authority and Old Town/Westside Improvement Authority meetings. The motion was unanimously
carried with Councilmember Stone abstaining. A joint meeting of the City Council and the Temecula
Redevelopment Agency was reconvened at 8:57 PM.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
3 Amscan Inc. Owner Participation Agreement
Assistant City Manager Mary Jane McLarney presented the staff report.
Mayor Birdsall opened the public hearing at 9:00 PM, and hearing no requests to speak, closed
the public hearing at 9:00 PM.
It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Councilmember Lindemans, to approve
staff recommendation as follows:
3.1 That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 97-52
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING AN
OWNER PARTICIPATING AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA
AND AMSCAN INC., A NEW YORK CORPORATION
3.2 That the Redevelopment Agency adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 97-03
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING AN OWNER PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND AMSCAN INC., A NEW
YORK CORPORATION
The motion carried unanimously.
Mayor Birdsall recessed the City Council portion of the meeting at 9:01 PM and the City Council
meeting was reconvened at 9:08 PM.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
21 Planning Application No, PA97-0030 Amendment and Restatement of Development Agreement
No. 5 for Portions of TM 23100, TM 23101, TM 23103 and TPM 28503. within Specific Plan
No. 1 99
Community Development Director Gary Thornhill presented the staff report.
Mayor Birdsall opened the public hearing at 9:15 PM.
Brian Johnson, 23333 Avenida la Ceiza, Coto de Ceiza, representing the applicant, stated he
concurred with the staff report and was available for any questions.
Mayor Birdsall closed the public hearing at 9:16 PM.
It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Councilmember Lindemans, to approve
staff recommendation 21.1.
21.1 Adopt the Negative Declaration for Planning Application No. PA97-0030.
The motion was carried unanimously.
l0
City Attorney Thorson clarified that Sections 11.2, 11.3, and 11.4 of the agreement are
deleted and Development Agreement Section 12.2 and Section A will be revised.
Mr. Johnson stated he was in agreement with Mr. Thorson's revisions and also noted the term
"Interim Public Facilities" appeared throughout the documents and asked that term be revised.
It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Councilmember Lindemans, to approve
staff recommendation with the following modifications: 1) Delete Sections 11.2_, 11.3 and
11.4; 2) change term "Interim Public Facilities Fee" to Public Facility Fee"; 3) Amend Section
12.2 "Public Facility Fee" to read as follows: (a) In lieu of the county Development Agreement
Fee, RSA Fee or City Public Facility Fee, Owner shall pay Public Facility Fee of Three Thousand
Five Hundred and Ninety Dollars ($3,590.00) per dwelling unit inclusive of Street Improvement
Fees, Traffic Signalization Fees, Fire Protection Fees, Parks and Recreation Fees and Library
Fees. The Public Facility Fee shall be paid as provided in Section 12.3 below."
21.2 Read by title only and introduce an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 97-10
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING AN AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
NO. 5 BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND BRAMALEA CALIFORNIA, LLC FOR
TM 23100, 23101, 23103 AND TPM 28503, WITHIN SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 199
(PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0030)
The motion was carried unanimously.
COUNCIL BUSINESS
22 Award of Professional Services Agreement for Weed Abatement Services
Jim Barron, County Fire Department, introduced Captain Brad Harris, Riverside County Fire
Department Hazard Reduction Manager, who made a presentation on the importance of week
abatement and providing defensible space around homes.
Mayor Birdsall requested the Planning Department have available for landscape architects and
developers, a list of low fire intolerant plants for this area. Mr. Thornhill stated the City's
landscape architect will review and comment on appropriate plants when there is an interfacial
issue with wildlands.
Chief Building Official Anthony Elmo presented the staff report.
Councilmember Stone asked if actual liens on forced abatement would come to the Council
or be handled administratively. Mr. Elmo replied the special assessment that go on county
records will be brought to the City Council for approval.
Mayor Birdsall suggested the posted notice state the amount of time the property owner will
be given to clear his property, plus the dollar amount Fire Protection Services would charge
to abate the property.
Mayor Birdsall asked if Fire Protection Services would be allowed to contract for weed
abatement as an independent, while under contract with the City. Senior Building Official
Tony Elmo replied there are two conditions that apply to the conflict of interest issue: 1) once
the agreement is signed, the contractor cannot contract independently for weed abatement
services in the City; 2) any forced abatement recommendations must come to staff for
authorization prior to the abatement work being done by the contractor.
Councilmember Stone expressed concern about property owner notification. Mr. Elmo replied
at the time of inspection, the property will be physically posted and a certified notification
letter sent to the property owner which will state the City can provide a list of contractors
available to do the weed abatement.
Mayor Birdsall inquired about property owners being required to clear 30' beyond their property
line. Mr. Elmo stated clearing beyond one's property line may be dictated by individual
CC&R's.
City Attorney Thorson pointed out the scope of work states the process the contractor has
to follow to notify property owners of a potential problem. He further stated the agreement
specifies the contractor cannot undertake any forced abatement without the prior written
authorization of the Director of Building and Safety.
Ken Osborne, President of Fire Protection Services, explained the process Fire Protection
Services will follow before doing any abatement work.
It was moved by Councilmember Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember Stone, to approve
staff's recommendation.
22.1 Approve a Professional Services Agreement, for Weed Abatement Services, with Fire
Protection Services, Inc.
The motion was carried unanimously.
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
None given.
CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT
None given.
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Councilmember Ford, to adjourn at 10:00 PM
to a CIP Workshop, June 3, 1997, 6:30 PM, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive,
Temecula, California.
The next regular City Council meeting is to be held June 10, 1997, 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers,
43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
ATTEST:
Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor
June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk
ITEM-.3
RESOLUTION NO. 97-
A RESOLUTION OF ~ CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND
DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXI:HRIT A
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMF.,CULA DOES RESOLVE,
DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A, on file in the
Office of the City Clerk, have been audited by the City Manager, and that the same are hereby
allowed in the amount of $1,330,336.51
Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 10th day of tune, 1997.
ATYEST:
Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor
June S. Greek, CMC/AAE
City Clerk
[SEAL]
P~so~ 137 I
STATE OF CAIJgORNIA)
COUNTY OF R/VERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEM]ECULA )
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do certify that the foregoing
Resolution No. 97- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Temecula on the 10th day of June, 1997 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: 5 COUNCILMFaMB~: Ford, Lindemarts, Roberts, Stone,
Birdsall
NOES:
0 COUNCK,MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0
COUNCILMg-MBERS: None
June $. Greek, CMC/AAE
City Clerk
Resos 137 2
crFYOF TEMECULA
UST OF DEMANDS
CEV2:2/97 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
05~9/97 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
05/30/g7 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
06/10/97 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
05/15/97 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN:
TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 06110197 COUNCIL MEETING:
DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND:
CHECKS:
001 GENERAL $ 452,441.16
120 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FUND 5,676.50
165 RDA-LOW/MOD 38,726.87
190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 65,610.05
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 10,233.55
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 57.86
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 22,422.25
194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 396.50
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ (ClP) 402,481.18
280 RDA-CIP 162,261.12
300 INSURANCE 2,384.84
320 INFORMATIONS SYSTEMS 19,622.58
330 SUPPORT SERVICES 387.67
'0 FACILITIES 3,159.39
$ 483,939.79
126,985.8~
358,054.76
216,881.24
144,474.89
$ 1,330,338.51
1,185,861.62
PAYROLL:
00~ GENERAL $ 99,670.45
165 RDA-LOW/MOD 2,144.49
190 TCS D 27.568.63
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 67.59
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 159.96
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 2,580.06
194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 1,042.65
280 RDA-CIP 3,632.80
300 INSURANCE 643.18
320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 3,071.96
330 SUPPORT SERVICES 791.12
340 FACILITIES 3,092.00
TOTAL BY FUND:
PREPARED BY THERESA4~VAREZ, ACCOUNTING SPECIALIST
.,
GENIE ROB~ERTS, DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
RONALD E. BRADLEY, CITY MANAGER
144,474.89
1,330,336.51
HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
. HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
VOUCHRE2
05/22/97
13:20
CiTY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIOOS
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
120 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FUND
165 RDA DEV- LO~/MO0 SET ASIDE
190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROd FUND
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP
300 INSURANCE FUND
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
SUPPORT SERVICES
FACILITIES
AMOUNT
27,958.50
5,676.50
37,858.00
7,598.10
7,668.88
219.08
260,958.64
148,619.09
2,069.79
5,108.88
121.00
283.53
TOTAL 483,939.79
'RE2
/97 13:20
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR
NUMBER DATE NUMBER
122241 05/19/97 002811
970521 05/21/97 002811
43498 05/22/97 0007"24
43499 05/22/97 001104
43500 05/22/97
43501 05/22/97 002785
43501 05/22/97 002785
43502 05/22/97
43503 05/22/97 002194
43504 05/22/97 000101
43505 05/22/97
,6 05/22/97
43507 05/22/97
43508 05/22/97 001260
43509 05/22/97 001054
43509 05/22/97 001054
43509 05/22/97 001054
43510 05/22/97 002803
43511 05/22/97 000131
43511 05/22/97 000131
43512 05/22/97 000135
43513 05/22/97 000462
43514 05/22/97 000146
43515 05/22/97
43516 05/22/97 000155
43517 05/22/97 001669
43517 05/22/97 001669
'7 05/22/97 001669
~ 05/22/97 001669
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIOOS
VENDOR
NAME
SUNRISE ESCRO~
SUNRISE ESCRO~
A & R CUSTOM SCREEN PRI
A R M A INTERNATIONAL
AEW/LBA ACQUISITION
ALL STATE POLICE SUPPLY
ALL STATE POLICE SUPPLY
ALTERNATIVES TO OOMESTI
AMERICAN PLANNING ASSN.
APPLE ONE, INC.
BEAL, KELLI
001950 BECHTEL MAINTENANCE SER
BELL, MARILYN
CPRS
CALIFORNIA BUILDING OFF
CALIFORNIA BUILDING OFF
CALI FORN IA BUILD ING OFF
CANTY ENGINEERING GROUP
CARL WARREN & CO., INC.
CARL WARREN & CO., INC.
CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER
CLUB, THE
COUNTS UNLIMITED
DANNECKER, LINDA
DAVL I N
DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATIO
DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATIO
DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATIO
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
1ST TIME BYER-OLIVEROS,R~JqIRO
1ST TIME HOMEBUYER-BEOF
BASKETBALL UNIFORMS
MEMBERSHIP:G.FLORES 97
REFUND: OVERCNARGED/LD97-O17GR
MISC SUPPLIES-SUB STATION
TAX
REG:R.ROBERTS 5/31 FUND RAISER
MEMBERSHIP:FAGAN,MATT 0?9309
TEMP HELP W/E 5/3 J.COMYNS
REIMB:SIERRA CF:4/30-5/l:BEAL
EXTERIOR WINDOW CLEANING
REFUND: EARLY TUMBLERS
TRN:AMAVISCA:REC.LEAD.TRN:6/07
SEMINAR:POST DISASTER:6 REGIST
SEM:POST DISASTER 6/11CUMMING
SEM:POST DISASTER 6/11 CABPAL
STRIPING EXHIBITS/WINCH,R.CA.
CLAIM SERVICES FOR APRIL
CREDIT: BILLED TWICE
MATERIAL SUPPLIES-STREET SIGNS
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
TRAFFIC COUNT CENSUS PROGRAM
REFUND:MOOELING WITH FIMO
TAPING OF COUNCIL MTG-5/13
CREDIT: RETURNED SUPPLIES
PAINT SUPPLY-GRAFFITI REMOVAL
PAINT SUPPLY-GRAFFITI REMOVAL
DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATIO PAINT SUPPLY-GRAFFITI REMOVAL
ACCOUNT
NUNBER
165-199-999-5449
165-199-999-5449
190-18~-999-5380
001-120-999-5277
120-199-4230
001-170-999-5610
001-170-999-5610
001-100-999-5260
001-161-999-5226
001-161-999-5118
001-161-999-5261
340-199-701-5212
190-183-4982
190-180-999-5261
001-162-999-5261
001-171-999-5261
001-171-999-5261
001-164-604-5250
300-199-999-5205
300-199-999-5205
001-164-601-5244
190-18~-999-5330
001-164-602-5406
190-183-4982
001-100-999-5250
001-164-601-5218
001-164-601-5218
001-164-601-5218
001-164-601-5218
ITEM
AMOUNT
18,867.00
18,991.00
240.45
145.00
5,676.50
920.00
71.30
40.00
263.00
180.60
49.28
250.00
46.00
60.00
510.00
85.00
85.00
560.00
2,797.29
727.50-
27.02
468.00
800.00
12.00
810.88
52.13-
158.03
66.27
74.41
PAGE 1
CHECK
AMOUNT
18,867.00
18,~1.00
240.45
145.00
5,676.50
991.30
40.00
263.00
180.60
49.28
250.00
46.00
60.00
680.00
560.00
2,069.79
27.02
468.00
800.00
12.00
810.88
246.58
VOUCHRE2
O5/22/97
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
43518
43518
43518
43518
43518
43518
43518
43518
43518
43518
43518
43519
43520
43520
43521
43521
43521
43521
43522
43522
43522
43522
43523
43524
43524
43525
43526
43527
43528
43529
43530
43530
43531
43532
43532
43532
43532
13:20
CHECK
DATE
05/22/97
05/22/97
05/22/97
05/22/97
05/22/97
05/22/97
05/22/97
05/22/97
05/22/97
05/22/97
05/22/97
05/22/97
05/22/97
05/22/97
05/22/97
05/22/97
05/22/97
05/22/97
05/22/97
05/22/97
05/22/97
05/22/97
05/22/97
05/22/97
05/22/97
05/22/97
05/22/97
05/22/97
05/22/97
05/22/97
05/22/97
05/22/97
05/22/97
05/22/97
05/22/97
05/22/97
05/22/97
VENDOR
NUMBER
001380
001380
001380
001380
001380
001380
001380
001380
001380
001380
001380
000523
002128
002128
000517
000517
000517
000517
002060
0O2O6O
002060
002060
002809
000165
000165
001135
002560
000184
002141
002141
000481
000177
000177
000177
000177
VENDOR
NAME
ES
ES
ES
ES
E S
ES
ES
E S
ES
ES
ES
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
EMPLOYMEHT SERVIC
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
ENPLOYMENT SERVIC
EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER
ENGINEERING VENTURES,
ENGINEERING VENTURES,
ENTENMANN-ROVIN & CO
ENTENMANN-ROVIN & CO
ENTENMANN-ROVIN & CO
ENTENMANN-ROVIN & CO
EUROPEAN DELl & CATERIN
EUROPEAN DELl & CATERIN
EUROPEAN DELl & CATERIN
EUROPEAN DELl & CATERIN
EXPERIAN
FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC.
FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC.
FIRST CARE INDUSTRIAL M
FISCHBACH & MOORE TRAF.
FRAZIN, SHERI
GTE
G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM
GELS, PAUL
GEIS, PAUL
GEOTECHNICAL & ENVIRONM
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENHIES OFFICE PRODUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PROOUCT
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
TEMP HELP (2)W/E 4/11 BR1DGHAM
TEMP HELP (2)W/E 4/11 BRIDGHAM
TEMP HELP (2)W/E 4/11 A.ADAMS
TEMP HELP C2)W/E 4/11 A.ADAMS
TEMP HELP (2)W/E 4/11 A.ADAMS
TEMP HELP W/E 4/25 A.ADAMS
TEMP HELP W/E 4/25 A.ADAMS
TEMP HELP W/E 4/25 A.ADAMS
TEMP HELP W/E 4/25 D.BRIOGHAM
TEMP HELP W/E 4/11 C.00NAHOE
TEMP HELP W/E 4/25 C.00NAHOE
95366-02 DIEGO DR LDSC
APRIL AUTOCAD SERVICES
CREDIT: BILLING ERROR
POLICE BADGE/WALLET-J.STONE
POLICE BADGE/WALLET-J.STONE
FREIGHT
TAX
SUPPLIES FOR EOC DISASTER
FREI GHT
TAX
REFRESHMENTS/COUNCIL MTG/5-13
CREDIT APS FOR RDA - APR
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
PRE-EMPLOYMENT EXPENSES
REIMB:BID PW96-17 TRAF.SIGNAL
REFUND:POM & CHEER
RELOCATION OF PHONE FACILITIES
909-699-1370-COP-APR
REPAIR OF POLICE MOTORCYCLES
REPAIR OF POLICE MOTORCYCLES
MAR PROF SERVS-CITY MAINT FAC!
OFFICE SUPPLIES - POLICE DEPT
MISC. OFFICE EQUIPMENT
TAX
MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
320-199-999-5118
320-199-999-5118
001-150-999-5118
001-110-999-5118
280-199-999-5118
001-150-999-5118
001-110-999-5118
280-199-999-5118
320-199-999-5118
001-161-999-5118
001-161-999-5118
193-180-999-5240
001-163-999-5250
001-163-999-5250
001-100-999-5220
001-100-999-5220
001-100-999-5220
001-100-999-5220
001'150-999'5260
001'150-999-5260
001-150-999-5260
001-100-999-5260
280'199-999-5250
001-120-999-5230
001-162-999-5230
001-150-999-5250
001-199-4053
190-18~-4982
210-165-601-5804
001-1990
001-170-999-5214
001-170-999-5214
210-190-144-5804
001-170-999-5610
001-170-999-5610
001-170-999-5610
001-110-999-5220
ITEM
AMOUNT
1,714.57
839.87
380.25
380.25
760.50
387.21
387.21
795.33
2,554.44
1,456.40
2,912.80
219.08
350.00
25.00-
61.20
31.00
6.00
7.38
70.00
5.00
5.43
115.01
50.00
15.56
40.61
93.00
25.00
20.00
236,876.00
122.52
200.00
325.00
2,212.50
147.44
222.96
17.28
29.63
CHECK
AMOUNT
12,568.83
219.08
325.00
195.44
50.00
56.17
93.00
25.00
20.00
236,876.00
122.52
525.00
2,212.50
417.31
'RE2
./97 13:20
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME
43533 05/22/97 001609 GREATER ALARM COMPANY,
43534 05/22/97 000520 H D L COREM & CONE~ INC
43535 05/22/97 001720 HOMETRONICS, INC.
43535 05/22/97 001720 HOMETRONIES, INC.
43535 05/22/97 001720 HOMETRONICS, INC.
43535 05/22/97 001720 HOMETRONICS, INC.
43536 05/22/97 001060 HYATT
43537 05/22/97 002787
43537 05/22/97 002787
43537 05/22/97 002787
IDENTICATOR CORPORATION
[DENTICATOR CORPORATION
IOENTICATOR CORPOILRT]ON
43538 05/22/97 000203 JOBS AVAILABLE, INC.
43539 05/22/97 JOHNSON, DEBBIE
43540
~0
05/22/97 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE
05/22/97 001667 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE
,~541 05/22/97 000206
43542 05/22/97 000209
43542 05/22/97 000209
43543 05/22/97 001534
43543 05/22/97 001534
43544 05/22/97 002187
43545 05/22/97 001522
43545 05/22/97 001522
CXTY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIl}OS
43546 05/22/97
43547 05/22/97 002229
43548 05/22/97 002632
43549 05/22/97 001967
43550 05/22/97 002011
43551 05/22/97 000220
43552 05/22/97 001290
05/22/97 00138~
05/22/97 001384
KINKO'S, INC.
L & M FERTILIZER, INC.
L & M FERTILIZER, INC.
LA MASTERS OF FINE TRAV
LA MASTERS OF FINE TRAV
ITEM
DESCR l PT ] ON
APR/MAY ALARM SRVCS'SUB'STATIO
96-97 PROPERTY TAX CORSULT.SVC
35" TV/ADVANCED PIP-PRIO~I~ STTN
4 HEAD VCR-PRKVI~ FIRE STATION
RCA 20" TV-PRIOA/ FIRE STATION
TAX
HTL:GFOA CF:MrnERNOTT 5/31-6/4
DIGIT-10 FINGERPRINT SYSTEM
FREIGHT
TAX
RECRUITMENT AD/OEV. PROC.COORD.
REFUND: BEGINNING TUMBLERS
TEMP HELP U/E 5/4 d.EVANS
TEMP HELP U/E 5/4 J.EVANS
PRINTING SERVICES FOR RDA
MISC MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
SMALL TOOLS/EQUI P. ~MA] NT. CRE~
AIR:J.STONE: ICSC CF:5/18-20
AIR:R.ROBERTS: ICSC CF:5/18-20
LAKE ELSINORE ANIMAL FR APR ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES
LAKE ELSINORE, CITY OF
LAKE ELSINORE, CITY OF
LEVEZU, ALAN
LUCE PRESS CLIPPINGS, I
MAIL BOXES ETC.
MANPOgER TEMPORARY SERV
MARTIN, KATHARINA E.
MAURICE PRINTERS, INC.
MEYER, JOHN
MINUTEMAN PRESS
MINUTEMAN PRESS
REG:R.ROBERTS R.BRADLEY 6/21
REG:R.ROBERTS R.BRAOLEY 6/21
REFUND:MUSIC FOR TODDLERS
APR-LUCE PRESS CLIPPING SRVCS
MAY MAIL DELIVERY SERVICES
TEMP HELP W/E 5/4 J.CASTILLO
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNZNGS
13 THANK YOU CERT. PRINTS
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
(10)SETS OF 500 BUSINESS CAROS
TAX
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-170-999-5610
001-140-999-5248
210-190-626-5610
210-190-626-5610
210-190-626-5610
210-190-626-5610
001-140-999-5258
001-170-999-5610
001-170-999-5610
001-170-999-5610
001-150-999-5254
190-18~-4982
001-163-999-5118
001-164-604-5118
280-199-999-5222
001-164-601-5218
001-164-601-5242
001-100-999-5258
001-1[)0-999-5258
001-172-999-5255
001-1(10-999-5260
001-110-999-5260
190-183-4982
280-199-999-5270
330-19'9-999-57~0
001-164-604-5118
190-183-999-5330
001-150-999-5265
190-1&$-999-5330
001-1~D-999-5222
001-1~D-999-5222
ITEM
AMOUNT
2~.99
2,400.00
1,255.00
279.00
199.00
134.31
439.56
590.00
7.86
45.73
57.60
50.00
46.80
265.20
7.28
939.26
458.47
81.00
159.00
2,753.66
35.00
35.00
32.00
150.63
121.00
574.00
520.00
200.42
60. O0
382.50
29.64
PAGE 3
CHECK
AMOUNT
2,400.00
1,867.31
439.56
643.59
57.60
50.00
312.00
7.28
1,397.73
240.00
2,753.66
70.00
32.00
150.6~
121.00
574.00
520.00
200.42
60. O0
412.14
VOUCHRE2
05/22/97 13:20
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERI(DOS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR
NUMBER DATE NUMBER
43554 05/22/97 001214
VENDOR
NAME
MORNINGSTAR MUSICAL PRO
ITEM
DESCRIPTZON
"BATTLE'OF THE BANDS" 5/10/97
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
190-183-999-5320
ITEM
AMOUNT
100.00
CHECK
AMOUNT
100.00
43555 05/22/97 001584
43555 05/22/97 001584
43555 05/22/97 001584
NEUPORT PRINTING SYSTEM
NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEM
NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEM
PRESENTAT]ON CHECK-PARKVI El~
FREIGHT
TAX
001-171-999-5222
001-171-999-5222
001-171-999-5222
248.60
74.99
19.27
342.86
43556 05/22/97 002139
43556 05/22/97 002139
43556 05/22/97 002139
43556 05/22/97 002139
43556 05/22/97 002139
NORTH COUNTY TIMES - AT
NORTH COUNTY TIMES - AT
NORTH COUNTY TIMES - AT
NORTH COUNTY TIMES - AT
NORTH COUNTY TIMES - AT
AD FOR CINCO DE MAYO FESTIVAL
ROADWAY CONSTRUCT]ON UPDATES
PUBLIC NOTICE - CDBG FY 97-98
PUB.HEARING NOTICE/PA97-0099
PUB.HEARING NOTICE/PA97-0083
190-180-999-5254
001-165-999-5256
001-140-999-5254
001-161-999-5256
001-161-999-5256
120.75
169.06
45.50
47.84
45.21
428.36
43557 05/22/97 002100 OBJECT RAZ)IANCE, INC. TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
190-183-999-5330
336.00
336.00
43558 05/22/97 002105
43558 05/22/97 002105
43558 05/22/97 002105
OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE
OLD TO~N TIRE & SERVICE
OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE
CITY VEHICLE MA]NT. & REPAIRS
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE &REPA]R
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE & REPAIR
001-110-999-5214
001-163-999-5214
001-163-999-5214
90.38
172.52
25.95
288.85
43559 05/22/97 002668 OMEGA LAKE SERVICES
43560 05/22/97 002344 OSVOLD, HEIDA
LAKE MAINT & "THE POND"
REIMB:SIERRA CF:4/30-5/1
190'180-999-5250
001-161-999-5261
800.00
35.78
800.00
43561 05/22/97 000249 PETTY CASH
43561 05/22/97 000249 PETTY CASH
43561 05/22/97 000249 PETTY CASH
43561 05/22/97 000249 PETTY CASH
43561 05/22/97 000249 PETTY CASH
43561 05/22/97 000249 PETTY CASH
43561 05/22/97 000249 PETTY CASH
43561 05/22/97 000249 PETTY CASH
43561 05/22/97 000249 PETTY CASH
43561 05/22/97 000249 PETTY CASH
43561 05/22/97 000249 PETTY CASH
43561 05/22/97 000249 PETTY CASH
43561 05/22/97 000249 PETTY CASH
43561 05/22/97 000249 PETTY CASH
43561 05/22/97 000249 PETTY CASH
43561 05/22/97 000249 PETTY CASH
43561 05/22/97 000249 PETTY CASH
43561 05/22/97 000249 PETTY CASH
43561 05/22/97 000249 PETTY CASH
43561 05/22/97 000249 PETTY CASH
43562 05/22/97 000254
43562 05/22/97 000254
43562 05/22/97 000254
43562 05/22/97 000254
43562 05/22/97 000254
PRESS-ENTERPRISE COMPAN
PRESS-ENTERPRISE CONPAN
PRESS-ENTERPRISE CONPAN
PRESS-ENTERPRISE CONPAN
PRESS-ENTERPRISE COMPAN
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
PUBLIC NOTICE:PROPOSED ORDINAN
PUBLIC NOTICE: PROPOSED ORDINA
PUBLIC NOTICE:PROPOSED ORDINAN
SUB:FINANCE:4/25/97-7/3/97
SUBMISSION FOR SAVVY AWARDS
210-190-144-5804
001-161-999-5260
001-162-999-5230
190-180-999-5260
001-110-999-5208
190-184-999-5301
001-150-999-5260
190-184-999-5301
190-184-999-5301
190-184-999-5301
190-184-999-5301
190-184-999-5301
190-18~-999-5305
001-150-999-5260
001-164-604-5260
001-162-999-5230
001-165-999-5260
001-140-999-5262
001-162-999-5243
190-183-999-5320
001-120-999-5256
001-120-999-5256
001-120-999-5256
001-140-999-5228
280-19~-99~-5270
2.63
11.59
3.04
11.67
16.~
36.91
21.22
41.80
4.93
37.04
27.49
44.48
5.37
20.00
2.50
5.36
47.00
27.40
11.10
51.79
8.50
9.00
9.00
24.01
35.00
430.05
85 ~1
43563 05/22/97 002776 PRIME MATRIX, INC. SC-5001317-6:J$:APRIL 001-100-~99-5208 53.07
43563 05/22/97 002776 PRIME MATRIX, INC. SC-5001339-O:KL:APRIL 001-100-999-5208 53.21
*RE2 CITY OF TEMECULA
/97 13:20 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
PAGE
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM
DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT
CHECK
AMOUNT
43563
43563
43563
43563
43563
43563
43563
43563
43563
43563
43563
43563
43563
43563
43563
43563
43563
43563
43563
43563
05/22/97 00277'6 PRIME MATRIX, INC. SC-500Z361-3:PB:APR%L 001-100-999-5208 30.82
05/22/97 002776 PRIME MATRIX, INC. SC-5001383-8:RR:APRIL 001-100-999-5208 61.26
05/22/97 002776 PRIME MATRIX, INC. SC-5001218-6:MJM:APRIL 001-110-999-5208 109.19
05/22/97 002776 PRIME MATRIX, INC. SC-5001322-6:RB:APRIL 001-110-999-5208 45.19
05/22/97 002776 PRIME MATRIX, INC. SC-5001375-4/JG 001-120-999-5208 29.13
05/22/97 002776 PRIME MATRIX, INC. SC-5001391-1:GR:APRIL 001-140-999-5208 37.08
05/22/97 002776 PRIME MATRIX, INC. SC-50013~3-2:GY:APRIL 001-150-999-5208 134.55
05/22/97 002776 PRIME MATRIX, INC. SC-5001215-2:GT:APRIL 001-161-999-5208 27.72
05/22/97 002776 PRIME MATRIX, INC. SC-5001379-6:JH:APRIL 001-163-999-5208 148.89
05/22/97 002776 PRIME MATRIX, INC. SC-5001207-9:BB:APRIL 001-164-601-5208 62.62
05/22/97 002776 PRIME MATRIX, INC. SC-5003835-5:BLAZER:APRIL 001-164-601-5208 46.74
05/22/97 002776 PRIME MATRIX, INC. SC-5001237-6:PW EOC:APRIL 001-16~-604-5208 106.58
05/22/97 002776 PRIME MATRIX, INC. SC-5001220-2:PW MAINT:APRIL 001-164-601-5208 39.38
05/22/97 002776 PRIME MATRIX, INC. SC-5001278-O:SM:APRIL 001-164-604-5208 65.11
05/22/97 002776 PRIME MATRIX, INC. SC-5001251-7 BH 190-180-999-5208 31.98
05/22/97 002776 PRIME MATRIX, INC. SC-5002330-8 CITY VAN 190-180-999-5208 31.99
05/22/97 002776 PRIME MATRIX, INC. SC-5001348-1KH 190-180-999-5208 49.21
05/22/97 002776 PRIME MATRIX, INC. SC-5001349-9/MW 190-180-999-5208 58.00
05/22/97 002776 PRIME MATRIX, INC. SC-5003948-6/SN 190-180-999-5208 40.50
05/22/97 002776 PRIME MATRIX, INC. SC-5001377-0 SR VAN 190-180-999-5208 42.18
1,304.40
05/22/97 002812 QUINT & THIMMI# LLP LEGAL SERV RE:OLD TWN/WESTSIDE 280-199-999-5246 2,500.00
2,500.00
43565
43565
43565
05/22/97 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER 28747 PUJOL STREET WATER METER 280-199-807-5804 303.64
05/22/97 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER PAUBA ROAO WATER METER 001-171-999-5240 10.31
05/22/97 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER PAUBA ROAD WATER METER 001-171-999-5240 50.05
3 64. O0
43566 05/22/97 001046 REXON, FREEDMAN, KLEPET APRIL 1997 LEGAL SERVICES-H.R. 001-130-999-5247 87.50
87.50
43567 05/22/97 000266 RIGHTWAY APR PORT TOILET FOR CITY YARD 001-164-601-5238 57.39
57.39
43568 05/22/97 001365 RIVERSIDE CO. ENVIRONME HEALTH PERMITS FOR SNACK BAR 190-180-999-5250
43568 05/22/97 001365 RIVERSIDE CO. ENVIRONME HEALTH PERMIT FOR PALONA DEL S 190-180-999-5250
65.00
65.00
130.00
43569
43569
43569
43569
43569
43570
05/22/97 002181 RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION APR PRGSS WINCHESTER/I-15 BRDG 280-199-602-5804 161,245.75
05/22/97 002181 RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION APR PRGSS WINCH/I-15 CHANGE OR 280-199-602-580~ 19,775.62
05/22/97 002181 RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION APR PRRSS WINCH/I-15 RETENTION 280-2035 18,101.94-
05/22/97 002181 RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION AMOUNT ADJT FOR CHANGE ORDERS 280'199-602-5804 21,714.75-
05/22/97 002181 RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION CORRECT AMOUNTS FOR CHANGE ORD 280-2035 2,171.47
05/22/97 002263 RIVERSIDE/SAN BERNARDIN MEMBERSHIP:J.KICAK:1997 001-164-604-5226 25.00
143,374.15
25.00
43571
43571
43571
43571
43571
05/22/97 000271 ROBERT BEIN, ~ FROST & OCT PROF PLAN CHECK CONSULT SV 001-162-999-5248 387.75
05/22/97 000271 ROBERT BEIN, WM FROST & JAN PROF PLAN CHECK CONSULT SV 001-162-999-5248 142.25
05/22/97 000271 ROBERT BEIN, NaN FROST & NOV PROF PLAN CHECK CONSULT SV 001-162-999-5248 135.75
05/22/97 000271 ROBERT BEIN, WM FROST & OEC PROF PLAN CHECK CONSULT SV 001-162-999-5248 247.00
05/22/97 000271 ROBERT BEIN, WH FROST & dUNE PROF PLAN CHECKING SVCS 001-162-999-5248 517.75
05/22/97 000873 ROBERTS, RONALD H. REIMB:LEAGUE/CA CITIES CF:4/30 001-100-999-5258 39.65
05/22/97 000645 SMART & FINAL, INC. SUPPLIES FOR "BATTLE OF BANDS" 190-183-999-5320 151.18
1,430.50
39.65
151.18
VOUCHRE2
05/22/97
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
43574
43575
43575
43575
43576
43576
43576
43576
43576
43577
43578
43579
43579
43579
43580
43581
43582
43582
43582
43583
43584
43584
43584
43584
43585
43586
43586
43586
43587
43587
13:20
CHECK
DATE
05/22/97
05/22/97
05/22/97
05/22/97
05/22/97
05/22/97
05/22/97
05/22/97
05/22/97
05/22/97
05/22/97
05/22/97
05/22/97
05/22/97
05/22/97
05/22/97
05/22/97
05/22/97
05/22/97
05/22/97
05/22/97
05/22/97
05/22/97
05/22/97
05/22/97
05/22/97
05/22/97
05/22/97
05/22/97
05/22/97
VENDOR
NUMBER
000519
000537
000537
000537
001212
001212
001212
001212
001212
000752
000305
0003O5
000305
000307
002766
002766
002766
002621
002621
002621
002621
001342
002109
002109
002109
001918
001918
VENDOR
NAME
SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIF GAS COMP
SOUTHERN CALIF GAS COMP
SOUTHERN CALIF GAS COHP
SOUTHERN CALIF GAS CONP
SOUTHERN CALIF GAS COMP
SOUZA, ROSEMARY
STONE, JEFFREY E.
TARGET STORE
TARGET STORE
TARGET STORE
TEMECULA TROPHY CO.
TEMEEU HILLS DEV.PARTNE
THOMAS BROTHERS MAPS
THOMAS BROTHERS MAPS
THOMAS BROTHERS MAPS
TRAFFIC COUNTS INC.
UNION BANK OF CALIF, N.
UNION BANK OF CALIF, N.
UNION BANK OF CALIF, N.
UNION BANK OF CALIF, N.
WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY,
WHITE CAP
WHITE CAP
WHITE CAP
ZUMAR INDUSTRIES~ INC.
ZUMAR INDUSTRIES, INC.
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
MAY PEST CONTRL SRVCS-SEN CNTR
2o02-351-5281 RANCHO VISTA
2-02-351-6800 VARIOUS METERS
2o01-202-7603 VARIOUS METERS
021 725 0775 SR CENTER
101 525 0950 TCC
133 040 7'57'5 CITY HALL
095 167 7907:PAUBA RD
091 024 9300 CRC
REFUND:CONTRACTED CLASS
REIMB:LEAGUE/CA CITIES CF:4/30
2 CAMERAS FOR RDA/PLAN DEPT
2 CAMERAS FOR RDA/PLAN DEPT
MISC.SUPPLIES FOR REC.CLASSES
"BATTLE OF THE BANDS" A~/ARD
REFUND:OVERPAYMENT/PA97-0160
LAMINATED THOMAS BROS MAP
FREIGHT
TAX
TRAFFIC COUNTER MACHINE RENTAL
5415305001995928 MJM
5415305001995928 MJM
5415305001995928 MJM
5415305001995928 MJM
BUILDING MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
MISC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
SMALL TOOLS/EQUIP.FOR LAND DEV
TAX
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES FOR PW
TAX
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
190-181-999-5250
190-182-999-5240
191-180-999-5240
191-180-999-5319
190-181-999-5240
190-184-999-5240
~40-199-701-5240
001-171-999-5240
190-182-999-5240
190-183-4982
001-100-999-5258
001-110-999-52~:
280-199-999-5242
190-180-999-5301
190-183-999-5370
001-161-4129
001-170-999-5610
001-170-999-5610
001-170-999-5610
001-1170
280-199-999-5228
280-1990
280-199-999-5270
001-110-999-5220
190-180-999-5212
001-164-601-5218
001-163-999-5242
001-163-999-5242
001-164-601-5218
001-164-601-5218
ITEM
AMOUNT
29. O0
3,030.24
44.04
7,424.84
35.44
29.26
33.53
16.43
538.00
16.00
54.77
76.92
32.96
10.17
64.67
299.00
175.00
6.00
14.93
150.00
107.00
15.00
487.60
66.42-
183.60
4.79
248. O0
19.22
863.00
66.88
CHECK
AMOUNT
29.0[
10,499.12
652.66
16.00
54.77
120.05
299.00
195.93
150.00
543.18
183.60
272.01
929.88
TOTAL CHECKS 483,939.79
~RE2 PAGE
/97 11:18
CITY OF TE#ECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
RDA DEV- LO~/NOO SET ASIDE
190 CONNUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D
CAPITAL ]#PROVEHENT PROJ FUND
REDEVELOPHENT AGENCY - CIP
iNSURANCE FUND
INFORHATiON SYSTENS
SUPPORT SERVICES
340 FACILITIES
ANOUNT
81,209.99
868.87
20,599.31
1,137.67
57.86
2,122.40
396.60
457.94
8,539.53
315.05
8,6~.~,5
266.67
2,379.49
TOTAL 126,985.8:1
VOUCHRE2
05/29/97
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
7O6024
706024
706024
706024
706024
706024
706024
706024
706024
706024
706024
706024
706024
706024
706024
706024
706024
706024
727112
727112
727112
727112
727112
727112
727112
727112
727112
727112
727112
727112
727112
727112
727112
727112
727112
727112
727112
727112
727112
727112
727112
727112
43590
43590
43590
43590
43590
11:18
CHECK
DATE
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/9?
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
O5/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
O5/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
VENDOR
NUMBER
000444
OO0444
000444
0004Z~4
000444
000444
OO0444
000444
000444
000444
OOOX~
000444
000444
00044./+
000444
000444
000444
000444
000283
000283
00028~
O0O283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
000283
00028~
000283
000724
000724
000724
O0O724
000724
VENDOR
NANE
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTAT/O( (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDO)
IHSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
IHSTATAX (EDD)
I#STATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
INSTATAX (EDD)
I#STATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
INSTAT/O((IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
]NSTATAX (IRS)
]NSTATAX (IRS)
INSTAT/O( (IRS)
IHSTATAX (IRS)
IHSTATAX (IRS)
INSTAT/O((IRS)
INSTAT/O((IRS)
IHSTATAX (]RS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
]NSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (IRS)
ZHSTATAX (IRS)
INSTATAX (]RS)
A & R CUSTOM SCREEN PRI
A & R CUSTOM SCREEN PRI
A & R CUSTOM SCREEN PRI
A & R CUSTOM SCREEN PRI
A & R CUSTOM SCREEN PRI
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
000444 SDI
00O444 SDI
000444 SOl
000444 SOl
000444 SDI
000444 SDI
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000444 STATE
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 FEDERAL
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
0002R~ MEDICARE
000283 MEOICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEOICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
000283 MEDICARE
BASEBALL PROGRAM AWARDS
T-SHIRTS FOR THE 4TH OF JULY
T-SHIRTS FOR THE 4TH OF JULY
SET-UP CHARGE
TAX
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-2070
165-2070
190-2070
19~J-2070
280-2070
340-2070
001-2070
165-2070
190-2070
191-2070
192-2070
193-2070
194-2070
280-2070
300-2070
320-2070
330-2070
340-2070
001-2070
165-2070
190-2070
191-2070
192-2070
193-2070
194-2070
280-2070
300-2070
320-2070
330-2070
340-2070
001-2070
165-2070
190-2070
191-2070
192-2070
193-2070
194-2070
280-2070
300-2070
320-2070
330-2070
340-2070
190-183-999-5380
190-180-999-5301
190-180-999-5301
190-180-999-5301
190-180-999-5301
ITEM
AMOUNT
38.78
4.22
55.48
1.52
4.68
3.64
4,247.04
75.22
837.61
1.44
3.40
56.83
28.34
141.95
43.08
147.86
19.40
34.15
15,836.39
248.15
3,660.19
8.39
20.94
313.99
156.51
461.40
136.94
616.80
91.41
229.66
3,554.84
959.48
2.28
5.22
87.20
36.10
125.07
24.21
112.90
26.54
99.66
346.96
576.00
168.00
25.00
59.60
CHECK
AMOUNT
5,744.6~
26,~7.63
1,!
43591 05/29/97 002804 ACTION CHEMICAL ENVIRO CLEAR FOR DUCK POND 190-180-999-5415 1,600.00
~E2
/97 11:18
VENDOR VENDOR
NUMBER NAME
05/29/97 002804 ACTION CHEMICAL
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE
43591
43591 05/29/97 002804 ACTION CHEMICAL
43591 05/29/97 002804 ACT%ON CHEMICAL
43592 05/29/97 ALBERTSONS
43593 05/29/97 002816 ALL VLLY PLUMBING & MEC
43594 05/29/97 002669 AMERICAN BATTERY, INC.
43595 05/29/97 000102 AMERICAN FENCE CO. OF C
43595 05/29/97 000102 AMER%CAN FENCE CO. OF C
43596 05/29/97 002480 ANIXTER, INC
43597 05/29/97 00272~ APPLIED CONCEPTS, INC.
43597
43598
'9
45600
43601
43601
43602
43603
43603
43603
43603
43604 05/29/97 001275
43605 05/29/97 002106
43606 05/29/97 000155
43607 05/29/97 001380
43608 05/29/97 001056
43608 05/29/97 001056
43609 05/29/97 000165
43609 05/29/97 000165
05/29/97 000170
05/29/97 000170
05/29/97 000170
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97 000135
05/29/97 000135
05/29/97 000137
05/29/97 002037
05/29/97 002037
05/29/97 0027~3 APPLIED CONCEPTS, INC.
05/29/97 002805 BECKER ENGINEERING
002377 BEST BUY COHPANY, INC.
002363 C C P 0 A
CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER
CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SER
CHEVRON U S A INC.
COH-AID, INC.
CON-AID, INC.
05/29/97 002037 COM-AID, INC.
05/29/97 002037 COM-AID, INC.
COHPUSERVE, INC.
DA FAMILY SUPPORT
DAVLIN
E S X EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC.
FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC.
FRANKLIN GUEST COMPANY,
FRANKLIN GUEST CONPAHY,
FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY,
CITY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIDOS
I TEN
DESCR I PT I ON
ENVIRO-BLUE FOR DUCK POND
LABOR
TAX
REFUND:SECURITY DEPOSIT
RESIDENTIAL IMPROVEMENT PRGH
VEHICLE BATTERIES
APR TEMP FENCING-PUJOL ST
JUN SECURITY FENCE-PUJOL ST
NISC COMPUTER SUPPLIES
BARD RADAR -POLICE DEPT
TAX
CONSTRUCT CAGE FOR CITY YARD
VIDEO CAMERA, FILM/SUPPLIES
MEMBERSHIP:L. FANENE 97
TEMPORARY "HO PARKING" SIGNS
TAX
FUEL EXPENSE FOR CITY VEHICLES
MISC REPAIR & MAINT OF EQUIP
(2)FIBER ADAPTORS
TAX
CALL ACCOUNTING SOFTWARE
APR COMPUSERVE INFO SERVICE
002106 SUPPORT
5/19 PLANNING COMMISSION MTG
TEMP HELP(2)W/E 5/9 DONAHOE
RNCHO HIGHLANDS-REPAIR MAINLNE
MAY LDSC-SPORTS PRK IMPROVEMNT
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES
CALENDAR REFZ LLS/SUPPLIES
CREDIT: DUPLICATE SHIPMENT
OFFICE SUPPLIES/PLANNING
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
190-180-999-5415
190-180-999-5415
190-180-999-5415
190-2900
165-199-813-5804
001-162-999-5214
280-199-807-5804
165-199-812-5804
320-199-999-5221
001-170-999-5610
001-177-999-5610
001-164-601-5610
001-165-999-5242
001-170-999-5226
190-18:3-999-5370
190-18:3-999-5370
001-162-999-5263
320-199-999-5215
320-1~-99~-5242
320-199-999-5242
320-1980
320-199-999-5228
190-2140
001-161-999-5250
001-161-999-5118
193-180-~9-5212
190-180-999-5415
001-150-999-5230
001-162-999-5230
001-161-999-5220
001-171-999-5228
001-161-999-5220
ITEM
AMOUNT
360.00
151.90
100.00
55.00
15.41
45.00
44.00
239.12
2,845.00
220.49
3,960.00
834.14
25.00
150.00
11.63
14.67
38.00
462.00
35.81
974.00
9.95
82.50
163.36
2,066.27
64.47
1,~50.00
9.69
7.40
145.03
185.01-
45.15
PAGE
CHECK
AMOUNT
2,861.90
100.00
55.00
15.41
89.00
239.12
3,065.49
3,960.00
834.14
25.00
161.63
14.67
1,509.81
9.95
82.50
163.36
2,066.27
2,014.47
17.09
5.17
VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA
05/29/97 11:18 VOUCHER/CHECK REG]STER
FOR ALL PERIOOS
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENI)OR ITEM ACCOUNT
NUMBER DATE NUMBER NANE DESCRIPTZOR NUMBER
TEN
ANOUNT
CHECK
43611 05/29/97 00018~ G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYN 909-197-5072-NAY-GENERAL USAGE 320-199-999-5208
43611 05/29/97 00018~ G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909-506*1941-MAY-PTA CD TTACSO 320-199-999-5208
43611 05/29/97 00018~ G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYN 909-676-0783-MAY-GENERAL USAGE 320-199-999-5208
43611 05/29/97 00018~ G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909-676-6243-MAY-PALA COI~ PRK 320-199-999-5208
43611 05/29/97 00018~ G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909-694-4354-MAY-PALA COMM PRK 320-199-999-5208
43611 05/29/97 00018/, G T E CALIFOR#IA - PAYM 909-695-356~-MAY-CITY ALARM 320-199-999-5208
43611 05/29/97 00018~ G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909-699-2811-MAY-GENERAL USAGE 320-1990
43611 05/29/97 00018~ G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909-699-8632-MAY-GENERAL USAGE 320-199-999-5208
43612 05/29/97 002545 GAMBLE, MARK S. TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330
3,008.59
55.09
63.06
27.55
30.36
53.49
1,342.57
28.19
300.00
4,608.90
300.00
43613 05/29/97 000192 GLOBAL CI:~qPUTER SUPPLIE (12) DUST BLASTERS 320-199-999-5221
43613 05/29/97 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLZE ANTI-STATIC WIPES 320-199-999-5221
43613 05/29/97 000192 GLOBAL CO#PUTER SUPPLIE SONY FLOPPY DISKETTES 320-199-999-5221
43613 05/29/97 000192 GLOBAL CONPUTER SUPPLIE FREIGHT 320-199-999-5221
43613 05/29/97 000192 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIE TAX 320-199-999-5221
6~.20
7.98
87.98
14.35
12.92
187.43
43614 05/29/97 001609 GREATER ALARN COMPANY, QTR 2 ALARM SRVC-SUB STATION 001-170-999-5610
55.50
55.50
43615 05/29/97 001517 HEALTH & HUMAN RESOURCE MAY EAP PROGRAM
43616 05/29/97 000963 HOGAN, OAVID REIMB: PLANNING CF 5/15-16
001-150-999-5250
001-161-999-5258
358.80
437.46
·
43617 05/29/97 001407 INTER VALLEY POOL SUPPL POOL SANITIZING CHEMICALS 190-182-999-5212
43618 05/29/97 000199 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVIC 000199 IRS GARN 001-2140
43619 05/29/97 000820 K R W & ASSOCIATES APR ENG PLAN CHECK SERVICES 001-163-999-5249
43619 05/29/97 000820 K R W & ASSOCIATES APR EHG PLAN CHECK SERVICES 001-163-999-5249
43619 05/29/97 000820 K R W & ASSOCIATES WORKERS COMP FOR INV#97-15 001-1182
43619 05/29/97 000820 K R W & ASSOCIATES OEBIT:HOURS BILLED 12.5 S/B 13 001-163-999-5249
43620 05/29/97 002023 KING, WENDE TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330
43621 05/29/97 001282 KNORR SYSTENS, INC POOL CHEMICAL SUPPLIES 190-183-999-5310
43622 05/29/97 002806 LAKE ELSINORE SPORTS BICYCLE RENTAL FOR BIKE SCHOOL 001-170-999-5261
43622 05/29/97 002806 LAr, E ELSINORE SPORTS TAX 001-170-999-5261
43623 05/29/97 000996 LOCAL GOVERNMENT PUBLIC PUB:CAL LAND USE 97 SUPPLEMENT 001-161-999-5228
43624 05/29/97 001967 MANPOWER TENPORARY SERV TEMP HELP W/E 5/11 CASTILLO 001-16~-604-5118
43625 05/29/97 000226 MICRO AGE COMPUTER CENT NP OFFICEdET LASER PRINTER 210-190-626-5610
43625 05/29/97 000226 MICRO AGE COMPUTER CENT TAX 210-190-626-5610
43626 05/29/97 002768 NIP. AGE PRINTING & IMAGI POSTERS FOR 4TH OF JULY EVENT 190-183-999-5370
43626 05/29/97 002768 MIRAGE PRINTING & IMAGI TAX 190-183-999-5370
43627 05/29/97 000228 MOBIL CREDIT FINANCE CO FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 001-170-999-5262
43627 05/29/97 000228 MOBIL CREDIT FINANCE CO FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 001-161-999-5263
310.32
2,862.50
315.00
54.66-
15.00
212.50
19.23
162.00
12.56
94.93
574.00
425.00
32.94
321.28
24.90
132.35
42.22
310.32
3,137.84
212.50
19.23
174.56
94.93
574.00
457.94
/97
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUHBER
43627
43628
43629
43630
43631
43632
43633
43634
43635
43636
11:18
CHECK
DATE
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
VENDOR
NUMBER
000228
000883
001654
001214
0008~5
002105
002088
001354
001911
VENDOR
NAME
MOBIL CREDIT FINANCE CO
MONTELEONE EXCAVATING
MONTEREY SYSTEMS, INC.
MORNINGSTAR MLISICAL PRO
NATIONAL LEAGUE OF ClTI
NETI~ORK SUBSCRIPTION SE
OLD TC~ TIRE & SERVICE
OLD TO~ TYPEgRITER
P C MAGAZINE
PALA MESA RESORT
PATEL, NIKLINJ I.
CITY OF TE#ECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES
TRUCK RENTAL AND MOVE EOUIPMNT
MASTER/DUPLICATE APERTURE CARD
EVENT STAFF CRC OVERTIME
"CONNECT CITIZENS & GOV'T"APPL
SUBSCRIPTIOR:301285HFE3200B096
CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & NAINT
REPAIR/CLEAN TYPEWRITER AT CRC
SUBSCRIPTION: 301285 HFE 3174B
NGMT RETREAT 4/24 & 4/25/97
REFUND: OVERPNT BL8626
45638 05/29/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PERS RET
43638 05/29/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET
43638 05/29/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET
43638 05/29/97 0002/,6 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET
43638 05/29/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PERS RET
43638 05/29/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET
43638 05/29/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET
43638 05/29/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET
43638 05/29/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PERS RET
43638 05/29/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET
43638 05/29/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET
43638 05/29/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PERS RET
43638 05/29/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PERS RET
43638 05/29/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS-PRE
43638 05/29/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR
43638 05/29/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR
43638 05/29/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 0002&6 SURVIVOR
43638 05/29/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR
43638 05/29/97 0002~6 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 0002&6 SURVIVOR
43638 05/29/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR
43638 05/29/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR
43638 05/29/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR
43638 05/29/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR
43638 05/29/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR
43638 05/29/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR
43638 05/29/97 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR
05/29/9? 001958 PERS LONG TERM CARE PRO 001958 PERS L-T
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-162-999-5263
001-164-601-5250
001-120-999-5277
190-183-999-5320
001-1990
320-199-999-5228
190-180-999-5214
190-182-999-5217
320-199-999-5228
001-150-999-5260
001-199-4056
001-2130
001-2390
165-2390
190-2390
191-2390
192-2390
193-2390
194-2390
280-2390
300-2390
320-2390
330-2390
340-2390
001-2130
001-2390
165-2390
190-2390
191-2390
192-2390
19'5-2390
194-2390
280-2390
300-2390
320-2390
330-2390
340-2390
001-2122
I TEN
AMOUNT
15.61
3,500.00
65.54
100.00
159.00
22.97
75.70
65. O0
2,941.60
1.00
22.18
15,78~.90
233.95
3,023.32
11.05
27.66
379.28
174.68
471.48
110.36
546.16
128.39
360.39
313.17
61.95
.8~
13.58
.05
.14
1.77
.97
1.85
.46
1.86
.93
2.09
40.62
PAGE 4
CHECK
AMOUNT
190.18
3,500.00
65.54
100.00
159.00
22.97
75.70
65. O0
79.95
2,941.60
1.00
21,673.46
40.62
VOUCHRE2
05/29/97
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
4364O
436~0
436~0
43641
43642
43642
43642
43642
43643
43643
43644
43645
43645
43645
43646
43647
43647
43648
43649
43650
43651
43651
43651
43651
43652
43653
43654
43654
43654
43654
43654
43654
43654
43655
11:18
CHECK VENDOR VENDOR
DATE NUMBER NAME
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
000247 PESTMASTER
000247 PESTMASTER
000247 PESTMASTER
000254 PRESS-ENTERPRISE COMPAN
0027'/6 PRIME MATRIX, INC.
002776 PRIME MATRIX, INC.
002776 PRIME MATRIX, INC.
002776 PRIME NATR[X, INC.
000255 PRO LOCK & KEY
000255 PRO LOCK & KEY
000635 R & J PARTY PALACE
000262
000262
000262
IL~NCHO CALIFORNIA WATER
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER
000404 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT
000353 RIVERSIDE CO. AUDITOR
000353 RIVERSIDE CO. AUDITOR
001942 S C SIGNS
002034 SAN DIEGO, CITY OF
000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR
000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIFONINA
001546 STRAIGHT LINE GLASS
002150
002150
002150
002150
002150
002150
002150
SUMMIT SAFETY PROOUCTS
SU~4IT SAFETY PR~OUCTS
StJ~41T SAFETY PRODUCTS
SUMMIT SAFETY PRODUCTS
SUMMIT SAFETY PRODUCTS
SUMMIT SAFETY PRODUCTS
SUMMIT SAFETY PRODUCTS
001672 TENECULA DRAIN SERV & P
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
RENEWAL OF R-O-W ~EED CONTROL
WEED ABATEMENT IN CHANNELS
REMOVAL/CUTTING SLOPES
PUBLIC NOTICE:PA97-0088
SC-5001373-9 TE
SC-5001206'1 HP
SC'5001202'0 IS
SC'5002401-7 TH
MAINTENANCE FACILITY RE-KEY
CRC LOCKSMITH SERVICES
EQUIP RENTAL FOR ENPYEE APPREC
VARIOUS WATER METERS
VARIOUS WATER METERS
VARIOUS WATER METERS
PRINTING SERVICES FOR PLANNING
FEB PRKING CITATION ASSESSMNT
FEB PRKING CITATION ASSESSMNT
PUBLIC HEARING SIGN PA96-0130
INSTALL/MAINTAIN RADIO EQUIP.
CITY HALL - PEST CONTROL SVCS.
2-07-626-6063 RANCHO VISTA
2-05-7~91-8807VARIOUS METERS
2-04-792-9005 ~R~RITA
53-77-806-0780-01 COSMIC
REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT
RESCREEN PATIO DOORS:CHRISTIAN
SHEER ADHESIVE STRIPS #020~
LATEX GLOVES #31~
MICROSHIELD & POUCH #1904
FREIGHT
TAX
MICROSHZELD & POUCH #1904
TAX
TEM COMM CTR PLUMBING SERVS
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-164-601-5402
001-164-601-5401
001-164-601-5402
001-161-999-5256
001-162-999-5208
190-180-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
320-199-999-5208
340-199-702-5250
190-182-999-5212
001-150-999-5265
190-180-999-5240
191-180-999-5240
193-180-999-5240
001-161-999-5222
001-2265
001-2260
001-120-999-5244
001-170-999-5215
340-199-701-5250
193-180-999-5240
191-180-999-5319
190-180-999-5240
191-180-999-5319
190-2900
165-199-813-5804
190-183-999-5310
190-1R~-999-5310
190-1~-999-5310
190-1g-~9-5310
190-1g-~-5310
190-1~-~-5310
190-1g-~-5310
190-184-999-5212
ITEM
AMOUNT
2,154.65
4,273.00
2,925.00
18.25
41.51
36.42
31.59
40.31
332.75
250.00
95.04
964.43
105.41
1,180.62
16.64
115.00
1,771.50
130.00
1,239.39
56.00
13.92
288.42
1,319.02
720.63
100.00
13.96
28.40
85.00
10.00
9.87
85.00
6.59
69.00
CHECK
AMOUNT
9,352.65
18.25
149.83
582.75
95.04
2,250.46
1,886.50
130.00
1,239.39
56.00
2,341.99
100.00
68.75
238.82
43656 05/29/97 000311 TEMECULA VALLEY HIGH SC ADVERTISING IN TVHS FTBAL PRSM 001-100-99~-5254 220.00 220.00
/97
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
43657
11:18
CHECK
DATE
05/29/97
VENDOR
NUMBER
001022
VENDOR
NAME
THOMPSON PUBLISHING GRO
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
FAIR LABOR STANDARDS HANDBOOK
43658 05/29/97 000389 U S C M /PEBSCO COBRA) 000389 PT RETIR
43658 05/29/97 000389 U S C M /PEBSCO COBRA) 000389 PT RETIR
43658 05/29/97 000389 U S C M /PEBSCO (OBRA) 000389 PT RETIR
43658 05/29/97 000389 U S C M /PEBSCO (ORRA) 000389 PT RETIR
43658 05/29/97 000389 U S C M /PEBSCO ¢ORRA) 000389 PT RETIR
43658 05/29/97 000389 U S C M /PEBSCO COBRA) 000389 PT RETIR
43659
43659
43659
43659
43660
43660
43660
43660
43660
4366O
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
05/29/97
,1
45661
43662
43662
43662
000325
000325
000325
000325
000326
000326
000326
000326
000326
000326
002566
002566
002566
000332
001342
001342
001342
002092
002092
002092
000347
43663
43664
UNITED WAY
UNITED WAY
UNITED WAY
UNITED WAY
UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE,
UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE,
UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE,
UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE,
UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE,
UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE,
VAIL ELEMENTARY PTA
VAIL ELEMENTARY PTA
VALLEY MICRO CC~PUTERS
VALLEY MICRO COMPUTERS
VALLEY MICRO COMPUTERS
VANDORPE CHOU ASSOCIATI
WALT DISNEY~S KRGIC KIN
WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY,
WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY,
WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY,
WINTER GRAPHICS SOUTH
WINTER GRAPHICS SOUTH
WINTER GRAPHICS SOUTH
ZEE SERVICE COMPANY, IN
43665
43665
43665
43666
43666
43666
43667
000325 UW
000325 U~
000325 UW
000325 UU
UNIFORMS RENTAL & CLEANING PW
TCSD UN%FORM MAINTENANCE
CITY HALL FLOOR HATS RENTAL
CRC FLOOR HAT RENTAL
SR CTR FLOOR HATS RENTAL
TEM COt4M CTR FLOOR HAT RENTAL
REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT
REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT
MICROSOFT PUBLISHER 97
1 CO ROM DRIVE
WINDOWS/WORDPERFECT TRAINING
PLAN CHECK FEES VAN DORPE
MEMBERSHIP: O-0823M-MK
BLDG HAINT SUPPLIES:CITY YARD
BLDG HAINT SUPPLIES:CITY YARD
BLDG HA]NT SUPPLIES: CITY HALL
TEMECULA TOURISM NWLTTR DESIGN
PRINTING "RIGHT FIT" BROCHURE
OESIGN "RIGHT FIT" BROCHURE
MEDICAL SUPPLIES FOR CITY
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-150-999-5228
001-2160
165-2160
190-2160
193-2160
280-2160
3~0-2160
001-2120
165-2120
190-2120
280-2120
001-16~-601-5243
190-180-999-5243
360-199-701-5212
190-182-999-5250
190-181-999-5250
190-18~-999-5250
190-2900
190-183-4990
320-199-999-5221
320-199-999-5221
320-199-999-5261
001-162-999-5248
001-150-999-5226
340-199-702-5212
340-199-702-5212
340-199-701-5212
280-199-999-5270
280-199-999-5270
280-199-999-5270
340-199-701-5250
ITEM
AMOUNT
248.00
581.72
63.38
832.24
22.80
70.16
54.58
101.80
2.50
17.00
2.70
696.63
106.55
185.24
127.60
51.72
65.88
100.00
34.00
86.15
134.69
258.00
4,379.66
135.00
197.63
~0.00
26.13
2,338.65
3,145.22
1,731.37
47.57
PAGE 6
CHECK
AMOUNT
248.00
1,624.88
124.00
1,233.62
134.00
478.84
4,379.66
135.00
973.76
7,215.24
47.57
TOTAL CHECKS 126,985.83
VOUCHRE2
05,,~0/97
08:~*
CITY OF TEHECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
210 CAPITAL ZMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND
280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY -
AMOUNT
202,7"57.46
150,214.80
5,102.50
TOTAL 358,054.76
~E2
.,/97 08:44
VOUCHER/
CHECK CHECK
NUMBER DATE
43679 05/29/97
43682 05/30/97
43683 05/30/97
43684 05/30/97
43685 05/30/97
43686 05/30/97
VENDOR VENDOR
NUMBER NAME
000348 ZIGLER, GAlL
002802 ELLIS GROUP, INC.
KI/FKLA RANCHO REALITY
K]/FKLA RANCHO REALITY,
STATE STREET BANK & TRU
002817 UNIVERSAL SPECIALTY VEH
CITY OF TEMECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERICeS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
REIMB:STAFF APPRECIATION LUNCH
APR LEGAL SERVICES
CASE#282~ll-SETTLEMENT
CSE#282~06 SETTLEMENT
FINAL SETTLEMENT PAYMENT
COMMAND POST TRAILER
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-150-999-5265
280-1652
210-165-601-5700
210-165-601-5700
001-1700
001-170-9~-5610
ITEM
AMOUNT
112.46
5,102.50
33,493.92
116,720.88
181,500.00
21,125.00
PAGE 1
CHECK
AMOUNT
112.46
5,102.50
33,493.92
116,720.88
181,500.00
21,125.00
TOTAL CHECKS 358,054.76
VOUCHRE2
05/~9/97
11:33
CZTY OF TENECULA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
190 COHHUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
Z10 CAPITAL INPROVENENT PROJ FUND
INFORHATION SYSTEHS
FACILITIES
AHOUNT
140,535.21
37,&12.64
1,627.00
20,080.7'7
10,850.00
5,879.25
496.37
TOTAL 216,881.2&
'.E2
/97
VOUCHER/
CHECK
NUMBER
43670
4~670
43671
43671
43672
43672
43672
43672
43672
43672
43672
43672
43672
43672
43672
43672
43672
~672
43674
43674
43675
43675
43676
43676
43676
4367'7
4367-/'
43677
43678
43678
11:33
CHECK
DATE
06/10/97
06/10/97
06/10/97
06/10/97
06/10/97
06/10/97
06/10/97
06/10/97
06/10/97
06/10/97
06/10/97
06/10/97
06/10/97
06/10/97
06/10/97
06/10/97
06/10/97
06/10/97
06/10/97
06/10/97
06/10/97
06/10/97
06/10/97
06/10/97
06/10/97
06/10/97
06/10/97
06/10/97
06/10/97
06/10/97
06/10/97
VENDOR
NUMBER
002348
002348
001281
001281
000126
000126
000126
000126
000126
000126
000126
0O0126
000126
000126
000126
000126
000126
000126
002758
000164
00016~
001056
001056
001343
0013~3
001343
000406
000406
000406
000434
000434
VENDOR
NAME
A-PARK AVENUE BUILDERS
A-PARK AVENUE BUILDERS
ALHAMBRA GROUP
ALHAMBRA GROUP
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA
CALIFORNIA LAMOSCAPE MA
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE NA
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA
CALIFORNIA LANOSCAPE MA
CALIFORNIA LANOSCAPE HA
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE NA
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HA
CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HA
ENVIABLE GREENS
ESGIL CORPORATION
ESGIL CORPORATION
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
EXCEL LANDSCAPE
HO~E gELDING & FABRICAT
HOgE gELDING & FABRICAT
HO~/E gELDING & FABRICAT
RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S
RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S
RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFFtS
SIERRA COMPUTER SYSTEMS
SIERRA COMPUTER SYSTEMS
CITY OF TEMECIJLA
VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER
FOR ALL PERIODS
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
DELETION OF DESILTING PONDS
REMOVE SILT/DEBRIS -CHANNEL
APR LDSC DESIGN SRVCS-gINCHSTR
APR LDSC DESIGN SRVCS-gINCHSTR
TEMECULA DUCK POMD LDSP HAINT
MARGARITA NEDIAM REPAIR4936701
HAY LDSC HAINT PARKS
MAY LDSC HAINT SENIOR CENTER
HAY LDSC HAINT FOR CRC
HAY LOSC MAINT CITY HALL
MAY LOSC HAINT MEDIANS
HAY LDSC HAINToT C C
HAY LDSC HAINT SAM HICKS PARK
MAY LDSC PAINT -T.M.S.
HAY LDSC HAINT'MARGAR.MEDIANS
CREDIT:APR LDSC SERVICES
CREDIT:APR LDSC SERVICES
CREDIT:APR LDSC SERVICES
VERTI-DRAIN SPORT FIELDS
MARCH PLAN CHECK SERVICES
MARCH PLAN CHECK SERVICES
MAY LDSC MAINT SLOPES
HAY LDSC HAINT SPORTS PARK
FABRICATE 2 STORAGE RACKS
REPLACE YARD ENTRANCE GATE
FABRICATE SIGN POST RACK/BARRI
96-97 LAW ENFORCEMNT FACILITY
96-97 LAW ENFORCENNT FACILITY
MARCH 97 BOOKING FEES
SIERRA SUPPORT MAINTENANCE
TAX
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
001-164-601-5401
001-164-601-5401
210-190-149-5802
210-190-149-5802
190-180-999-5415
191-180-999-5415
190-180-999-5415
190-181-999-5415
190-182-999-5415
340-199-701-5415
191-180-999-5415
190-184-999-5415
190-180-999-5415
190-180-999-5415
191-180-999-5415
190-180-999-5415
190-181-999-5415
190-182-999-5415
190-180-999-5415
001-162-999-52&8
001-162-999-5248
193-180-999-5415
190-180-999-5415
001-16~-601-5610
001-16~-601-5610
001-16~-601-5610
001-170-999-5234
001-2030
001-170-999-5273
320-199-~9-5211
320-1~9-999-5211
ITEM
AMOUNT
B,000.00
6,500.00
8,910.90
1,939.10
141.25
616.00
19,651.37
245.67
1,692.53
496.37
926.00
325.00
760.00
1,480.00
85.00
981.23-
4.91-
101.55-
6,500.00
1,771.49
4,802.55
20,080.77
7,704.51
5,600.00
213.75
4,090.00
24,960.55
74,~1.67
9,715.20
5,670.00
209.25
PAGE I
CHECK
AMOUNT
14,500.00
10,850.00
25,331.50
6,500.00
6,574.04
27,785.28
9,903.75
109,557.42
5,879.25
TOTAL CHECKS 216,881.24
.
-..
. ,
I'I'EM 4
ADPROVAI.
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
Genie Roberts, Director of Finance~J
June 10, 1997
City Treasurer's Statement of Investment Policy
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt the Treasurer's Statement of
Investment Policy as proposed by Staff which provides safety, liquidity and yield for City funds.
DISCUSSION: The California legislature has passed legislation imposing a State-mandated
local program requiring the treasurer or chief fiscal officer to render an annual statement of
investment policy to the legislative body of the local agency and to render a quarterly report
containing specified information regarding investments and deposits to the chief executive
officer and the legislative body of the local agency. The Treasurer's Statement of Investment
Policy, as presented herein, is in conformity with the State requirements and guidelines
established by the California Municipal Treasurer's Association, the California Society of
Municipal Treasurer's Association, and the California Society of Municipal Finance Officers.
There are no changes this year to the existing policy.
The City of Temecula currently invests primarily in the State of California Local Agency
Investment Fund (LAIF). This investment is consistent with the City's Investment Policy which
prioritizes safety and liquidity over yield. It should be noted that LAIF is prohibited by state
code from investing in certain derivative products such as inverse floaters. LAIF investment
policy also puts constraints on the use of reverse repurchase agreements. Government Code
Section 16429.3 states that 'money placed with the State Treasurer for deposit in LAIF by
cities, counties, or special districts shall not be subject to impoundment or seizure by any state
official or state agency".
FISCAL IMPACT: None
ATTACHMENTS Proposed Investment Policy
R:tNORTONLb4OENDAStlNV~TPLC. AON 06/03/97
CITY OF TEMECULA
INVESTMENT POLICY
INTRODUCTION
The investment policies and practices of the City of Temecula are based upon State law and
prudent money management. The primary goals of these policies are:
1. To protect the principal monies entrusted to this office.
2. To provide sufficient liquidity to meet normal operating and unexpected
expenditures.
To assure compliance with all Federal, State, and Local laws governing the
investment of monies under the control of the City Treasurer.
To generate a maximum amount of investment income within the parameters of
prudent risk management and consistent with the above policies.
The monies entrusted to the City Treasurer (referred to as the 'Fund" throughout the remainder
of this document) will be invested, administered, and reported in a timely and prudent manner.
The City Treasurer and staff will observe, review, and react to changing conditions that effect
the fund. The authority to execute investment transactions that will effect the Fund will be
limited to:
· City Manager or Assistant to the City Manager or City Clerk and
· Director of Finance acting together
The Director of Finance will meet on a regular basis with the City Manager to discuss current
market conditions, future trends, and to plan investment strategy to meet the City's fiscal
objectives.
The policy stated below will also address risk management because it is such an integral part
of the investment policy. To concentrate only on maximizing return would be dangerous;
therefore, policy issues will be directed to:
1. Limiting the Fund's exposure to each issue and issuer of debt; and
Determining a minimum credit requirement that firms must have in order to hold
City money.
R: INOR TONL ~ G ENDA $11N VS TPL C.~4 GN 1
III
CITY OF TEMECULA
INVESTMENT POLICY
SCOPE
In accordance with Ordinance No. 90-2 of the City Council of the City of Temecula and
as prescribed by Section 41000 through 41007 of the Government Code of the State
of California, the City Treasurer is responsible for investing the unexpended cash in the
City Treasury.
OBJECTIVES
A. .~afety of PrinciDal
Safety of principal is the foremost objective of the City of Temecula. Each
investment transaction shall seek to ensure that capital losses are avoided,
whether from securities default, broker-dealer default, or erosion of market value.
The City shall seek to preserve principal by mitigating the two types of risk:
credit risk and market risk.
Credit Risk. Credit risk, defined as the risk of loss due to failure of the
issuer of a security, shall be mitigated by investing only with issuers
whose financial strength and reputation can be verified to be the highest
as rated by nationally known rating agencies (see Section VI for detailed
limitations on credit risk), and by diversifying the investment portfolio so
that the failure of any one issuer would not unduly harm the City's cash
flow.
Market Risk. Market risk, the risk of market value fluctuations due to
overall changes in the general level of interest rates, shall be mitigated by
(a) structuring the portfolio so that securities mature earlier than or
concurrent with the timing of major cash outflows, thus eliminating the
need to sell securities prior to their maturity; (b) prohibiting the use of
leverage and margin accounts; and (c) prohibiting the taking of short
positions -- that is, selling securities which the City does not own. It is
explicitly recognized herein, however, that in a diversified portfolio,
occasional measured losses are inevitable, and must be considered within
the context of the overall investment return.
B. Return on Investment
The City's investment portfolio shall be designed to attain a market-average rate
of return through economic cycles. The market-average rate of return is defined
as the average return on three-month U.S. Treasury bills. Whenever possible,
and consistent with risk limitations, as defined herein, and prudent investment
principles, the Treasurer shall seek to augment returns above the market average
rate of return.
SAFEKEEPING OF SECURITIES
To protect against potential losses by collapse of individual securities dealers, all
securities owned by the City, including collateral on repurchase agreements, shall be
held in safekeeping by a third party bank trust department, acting as agent for the City
R:iNORTONL~GENDA$11NVSTPLC. AGN 2 04/02/87
IV
V
VI
CITY OF TEMECULA
INVESTMENT POUCY
under the terms of a custody agreement executed by the bank and by the City. All
securities will be received and delivered using standard delivery versus payment
procedures (i.e., the City's safekeeping agent will only release payment for a security
after the security has been properly delivered). This section is intended to comply with
Government Code 53635.
REPORTING
The City Treasurer shall render a monthly report to the City Manager and City Council
showing the type of investment, issuing institution, selling institution, date of maturity,
par and dollar amount of deposit, current market value for all securities, return on the
City's investment portfolio expressed as an annual percentage rate, yield to maturity,
cash flow information demonstrating that the City can meet its upcoming financial
obligations, and such data as may be required by the City Council. The report shall also
state its relationship to this statement of investment policy, as directed under the Code.
The treasurer shall annually submit a recommended updated Investment Policy to be
reviewed and approved by City Council. The City's investment reporting policy meets
or exceeds the requirements of Section 53646 of the California Government Code.
QUALIFIED DEALERS
The City shall transact investments only with banks, savings and loans, investment
security dealers and the State of California Local Agency Investment Fund. The dealers
must be primary dealers regularly reporting to the New York Federal Reserve Bank.
Exceptions to this rule will be made only after thorough research and documented
confirmation of financial strength and reputation and after approval by the City Council.
Investment staff shall investigate dealers who wish to do business with the City in order
to determine if they are adequately capitalized, make markets in securities appropriate
to the City's needs, and are recommended by managers of portfolios like the City's.
The City shall at least annually send a copy of the current investment policy to all
dealers approved to do business with the City. Confirmation of receipt of this policy
shall be considered as evidence that the dealer understands the City's investment
policies, and intends to show the City only appropriate investments.
AUTHORIZED INVESTMENTS
Investments shall be made in the context of the "prudent investor" rule, which states:
"investments shall be made with judgment and care, under circumstances
then prevailing, which persons of prudence, discretion, and intelligence
exercise in the management of their own affairs, not for speculation, but
for investment, considering the probable safety of their capital as well as
the probable income to be derived.'
The City is further governed by the California Government Code, Sections 53600 et seq
(attached). Within the context of these limitations, the following investments are
authorized, as further limited herein:
R:INORTONLI,4GENDAStlNVSTPL C. AGN 3 o,/oz~7
Co
CITY OF TEMECULA
INVESTMENT POLICY
!Jnited .~tates Treasury Bills. Ronds. and Notes. or those for which the full faith
and credit of the United States are pledged for payment of principal and interest.
There is no limitation as to the percentage of the portfolio which can be invested
in this category. Maturity is not to exceed the projected dates of the City's cash
needs or five years, whichever is less.
C~bligations issued by the Government National Mortgage Association (RNMA).
the Federal Farm Credit Rank System (FFCR). the Federal Home ! pan Rank Roard
(FH! R). and the Federal National Mortgage Association ¢FNMA). Although there
is no percentage limitation on the dollar amount that can be invested in these
issues, the "prudent investor" rule shall apply for a single agency name.
Maturity is not to exceed the projected dates of the City's cash needs or five
years, whichever is less.
Rills of exchange or time drafts drawn on and accepted by a commercial hank.
otherwise known as banker's acceptances. Banker's acceptances purchased
may not exceed 270 days to maturity or 40% of the market value of the
portfolio. No more than 10% of the market value of the portfolio may be
invested in banker's acceptances issued by any one bank.
Commercial ps.0er ranked "P1" by Moody's Investor Services and "A1 +" by
Rtandard and Poor's. and issued by a domestic corporation having assets in
excess of $500.000.000 and having an "A" or better rating on its long-term
debentures as provided by Moody's or Standard and Poor's. Purchases of
eligible commercial paper may not exceed 15% of the market value of the
portfolio. No more than 10% of the market value of the portfolio may be
invested in commercial paper issued by any one corporation. The City may
invest in no more than 10% of a single corporation. The City may invest in no
more than 10% of a single corporation's commercial paper. Maturity is not to
exceed 180 days.
Negotiable certificates of deposit issued by nationally or state-chartered bank or
a state or federal savings and loan association. Negotiable certificates of deposit
(NCDs) differ from other certificates of deposit by their deposit liquidity. They
are issued against funds deposited for specified periods of time and earn
specified or variable rates of interest. NCDs are traded actively in secondary
markets. When feasible, an independent trading service will be used as part of
the evaluation process. Issuers must be rated 'B" or better by Thomson Bank
Watch or equivalent rating service, or rated A-1 for deposits by Standard &
Poor's, or P-1 for deposits by Moody's or comparably rated by a national rating
agency.
Transactions in NCDs shall not collectively exceed 30% of the total portfolio in
effect immediately after any such investment is made.
Repurchase Agreements. The City may invest in repurchase agreements with
banks and dealers with which the City has entered into a master repurchase
agreement which specifies terms and conditions of repurchase agreements.
R:~VORTONL kAGENDA$11NVSTPLC. AON 4
CITY OF TEMECULA
INVESTMENT POLICY
Transactions shall be limited to the primary dealers and the top banking
institutions according to the rating agency based on liquidity, profitability,
and financial strength. The maturity of repurchase agreements shall not
exceed 30 days. The market value of securities used as collateral for
repurchase agreements shall be monitored daily by the investment staff
and will not be allowed to fall below 102% of the value of the repurchase
agreement plus the value of collateral in excess of the value of the
repurchase agreement (haircut). in order to conform with provisions of
the Federal Bankruptcy Code which provide for the liquidation of
securities held as collateral for repurchase agreements, the only securities
acceptable as collateral shall be certificates of deposit, eligible bankers'
acceptances, or securities that are direct obligations of, or that are fully
guaranteed as to principal and interest by, the United States or any
agency of the United States.
No more than 50% of the portfolio may be invested in repurchase
agreements, and a "perfected security interest" shall always be
maintained in the securities subject to a repurchase agreement.
local Agency Investment Fund. The City may invest in the Local Agency
Investment Fund (LAIF) established by the State Treasurer for the benefit of local
agencies up to the maximum permitted by State law.
Time r~eposits. The City may invest in non-negotiable time deposits
collateralized in accordance with the California Government Code (attached), in
those banks and savings and loan associations which meet the requirements for
investment in negotiable certificates of deposit. Since time deposits are not
liquid, no more than 15% of the portfolio may be invested in this category. The
issuer firm should have been in existence for at least five years. The City may
waive the first 100,000 of collateral security for such deposits if the institution
is insured pursuant to federal law. In order to security the uninsured portions of
such deposits, an institution shall maintain at least 10% in excess of the total
amount deposited. Real estate mortgages may not be accepted as collateral.
The maximum term for deposits shall be one year. In general, the issuer must
have a minimum 6% net worth to assets ratio or the minimum ratio established
by the Comptroller of the Currency. The issuer's operation must have been
profitable during their last reporting period.
Money Market Funds. The City may invest in money market funds which invest
solely in U.S. Treasuries, obligations of the U.S. Treasury, and repurchase
agreements relating to such treasury obligations. To be eligible, companies
selling money market funds must have an investment advisor with not less than
five years experience and that is registered with the SEC, has the highest ranking
available as evaluated by a nationally recognized rating service, and with assets
in excess of $500 million.
Ineligible Investments. Investments not described herein, including, but not
limited to, reverse repurchase agreements, mutual funds, zero coupon bonds,
inverse floaters, mortgage backed securities, common stocks and corporate
notes and bonds are prohibited from use in this portfolio.
R:INORTONLb4GEND~$11NVSTPLC. AGN 5 04/02/~7
CITY OF TEMECULA
INVESTMENT POLICY
VII SWAPPING OF SECURITIES
A swap is the movement from one security to another and may be done for a variety
of reasons, such as to increase yield, lengthen or shorten maturities, to take a profit, or
to increase investment quality. The purchase transaction and the sale transaction must
each be recorded separately and any losses or gains on the sale must be recorded.
VIII PORTFOLIO ADJUSTMENTS
Should an investment percentage-of-portfolio limitation be exceeded due to an incident
such as fluctuation in portfolio size, the affected securities may be held to maturity to
avoid losses. When no loss is indicated, the Treasurer shall consider reconstructing the
portfolio basing his or her decision, in part, on the expected length of time the portfolio
will be unbalanced.
IX POLICY REVIEW
This investment policy shall be reviewed at least annually to ensure its consistency with
the overall objectives of preservation of principal, liquidity, and return, and its relevance
to current law and financial and economic trends. The City Council shall be responsible
for maintaining guidance over this investment policy to ensure that the City can adapt
readily to changing market conditions, and shall approve any modification to the
investment policy prior to implementation.
STATE LAW
The legislated authority of the Fund is covered in Sections 53601, 53635 and 53646 of the
Government Code. Enclosed are copies of the statutes which determine the maximum
parameters of the Fund. It is the policy of the City Treasurer to comply with the State laws
governing the Fund.
R:INORTONLb~GENDA$11NVSTt~LC.A~N 6
ITEM"5
APPROVAl
C TY A'rTORNEY
FINANCE DIREC~T~
CITY MANAGER)'~ ~
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
City Council/City Manager
FROM:
DATE:
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
June 10, 1997
SUBJECT:
PREPARED BY:
Accept Offers of Dedication for Street, Utility and Services Purposes
Within Parcel Maps No. 4646 and 28084 for Portions of Zevo Drive,
Winchester Road and Remington Avenue
~.~,~ Ronald J. Parks, Principal Engineer- Land Development
Larry D. Cooley, Assistant Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 97-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ACCEPTING OFFERS OF DEDICATION FOR PUBLIC
STREET, UTILITY AND SERVICES PURPOSES WITHIN PARCEL
MAPS NO. 4646 AND 28084 BUT NOT ACCEPTING INTO THE
CITY MAINTAINED-STREET SYSTEM.
BACKGROUND:
As standard conditions for final maps and associated development, frontage right-of-way is
required to be dedicated to centerline plus six feet. Phased Final Maps of TPM 24085, owned
by Mr. Bill Dendy of Westside City II and Westside Business Centre, will ultimately be the
instruments for dedication of most of the half-street right-of-way fronting Zevo Drive (Avenida
de Ventas), Winchester Road and Remington Avenue. However, the subject Offers of
Dedication will provide offsite right-of-way necessary to complete full-street improvements of
said streets. Mr. Dendy intends to complete the obligation of street improvements prior to final
map approval for PM 24085-2. This final map, to be recorded in the near future, will
accomodate an appproximately 225,000 square foot warehouse building in the LI Zone.
Attached with the Resolution are Offers of Dedication and Legal Descriptions (Exhibit "A") and
Plats (Exhibit "B") for street dedications for portions of Zevo Drive, Winchester Road and
Remington Avenue, which are necessary to complete public improvements providing access
to new development within TPM 24085. Westside City II and Westside Business Centre, as
owners of the lands within said tentative maps, has reviewed the project plans and legal
descriptions and has agreed to dedicate the necessary easements for this project.
R :~.O D~ l 0\OFFERDi~D .STS IcY&
The proposed street improvements for Zevo Drive, Winchester Road and Remington Avenue will
not be accepted into the City maintained street system until all the street improvements have
been completed and accepted by the City Council.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
Attachments:
Resolution No. 97- with Exhibits "A" and
Copy of Offer of Dedication (Original on File).
Location Map; Tentative Parcel Map No. 24085
R:KAGD~ 10\OFPI=IO)ED.STS le/~t
RESOLUTION NO. 97-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING OFFERS OF DEDICATION
FOR PUBLIC STREET, UTILITY AND SERVICES
PURPOSES WITItlN PARCEL MAPS NO. 4646 AND 28084,
BUT NOT INTO THE CITY MAINTAINED-STREET
SYSTEM.
The City Council of the City of Temecula does resolve, determine and order as follows:
WHEREAS, portions of streets within underlying Parcel Maps No. 4646 and 28084,
encompassing phased final maps for TPM 24085, as shown in Exhibits "A" and 'B" attached
hereto, have been offered for dedication to the City by Westside City II and Westside Business
Centre: and,
WHI~E.~, the dedications are easements for street, utility and public services purposes
and are necessary for the construction of improvements and future aceepmee into the public street
system of the City of Temecula.
NOW, ~RE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Temecula
as follows:
Drive,
hereto.
Section 1. That the City of Temecula accepts the offers of dedication for portions of Zevo
Winchester Road, and Remington Avenue described in Exhibits "A" and "B" attached
Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula
at a regular meeting held on the 10th of June, 1997.
A'I~EST:
Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
R:~G DRP'~97R~ I 0~,OFI- IaKDED.XTS
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that
Resolution No. 97- wa~ duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a reg.lar meeting thereof held on the 10th day of June, 1997, by the following vote:
0 COUNCILM]E~S:
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
II:~A G DRFrLq'7X~I 0'~O FFERDED.ST$ leg~
EXqqTRIT '"A"
Right-of Way Dedications for
Zevo Drive, Winchester Road and Remington Avenue
Offers of Dedication and Legal Descriptions
R :~AG ~9'~0610~,0 e t. I:,t~)ED.,~TS Ic/~
OFFER OF DEDICATION - ROAD PURPOSES
The undersigned, being the present title owner(s) of record of the herein described parcel of land, do hereby make an
irrevocable offer of dedication to the City of Temecula, a political subdivision of the State of California, and its successc
or assigns, for street and highway purposes, the real property situated in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, Stak
California, described in Exhibit "A (written description) and shown on Exhibit "B" (plat map) attached hereto.
It is understood and agreed that the C]t~ of Temecula and its successors or assigns shall incur no liability with respect to
such offer of dedication, and shall not assume any responsibility f6r the offered parcel of land or any improvements thereon
or therein, until such offer has been accepted by appropriate action of the City Council, or of the local governing bodies or
its successors or assigns.
IN WITNESS THEREOF, these pr~ents have executed this instrument
The provisions hereof shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon heirs, successors, assigns, and personal
representatives of the respective parties hereto. Westside Business Centre, LLC
Dendy Real Estate a Investment
Company, Manager
N..,/ ff-_cm~ame a"d Title / //
STATE OF CALIFORNIA } SS.
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE}
On x-/-/6 - q 7 , before me the undersigned,
a Nota_.ry Public in and for the State of California, personally appeared
personally known to me (or proved ~e on the b~is o~
salisfactory evidencc to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/arc
subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that
he/she;they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacily(ies)
and that by his/her/their signalare(s) on lhe inst~ment the pemon(s),
or the entity uoon behalf of which the pemonls~ acled. executed the
instrument.
Secretary
ACCEPTANCE CERTIFICATE
The City Council, City of Temecula hereby accepts the grant of real property as set forth above.
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor
.. Greek, City Clerk
,/ED AS TO FORM:
BY:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
EXHIBIT A-,f:L~O~ DESCR[P'fiO~q
RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION
March 11, 1997
ZEVO DRIVE
A Portion of Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 28084
That portion of Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 28084, in the City of Temeculo,
County of Riverside, State of California, os shown by map on file in
Book 185 of Parcel Mops, Pages 51, 52 and 5.3, Records of said Riverside
County, described os follows:
Beginning at the intersection of the eosterty line of said Parcel 1 with
the centerline of Zevo Drive, formerly known os Avenido De Ventos;
Thence along said centerline of Zevo Drive, being also along the northerly
line of said Parcel 1, the following courses:
South 49'06'40" West o distance of 479.2.3 feet to the beginning of o
tangent curve concave northwesterly and having o radius of 800.00 feet;
Southwesterly along said curve through o central angle of 28'59'45" on arc
distance of 400.20 feet;
Tangent to said curve South 77%6'25" West o distance of 651.6,3 feet to
the beginning of o tangent curve concave southeasterly and having o radius
of 500.00 feet;
Southwesterly along said curve through on central angle of 12'16'14" on arc
distance of 107.08 feet;
Tangent to said curve South 65'50'11" West o distance of 259.85 feet to on
intersection with the centerline of Winchester Rood , continuing
South 65'.30'11" West o distance of 50.00 feet to the beginning of o
non-tangent curve concave northeasterly and having o radius of 900.00 feet,
o radial line to the beginning of said curve bears South 65'30'11" West;
Thence, southeasterly along said curve through o central angle of 2'29'01"
on arc distance of 39.01 feet;
Thence North 65'30'11" East o distance of .309.00 feet to the beginning of o
tangent curve concave southeasterly and having o radius of 461.00 feet,
said curve being concentric with the hereinabove described curve having o
radius of 500.00 feet;
Thence northeasterly along said curve through o central angle of 12'16'14"
on arc distance of 98.75 feet;
Thence tangent to said curve North 77'46'25" East o distance of 651.6.3 feet
to the beginning of o tangent curve concave northwesterly and having o
radius of 839.00 feet, said curve being concentric with the hereinabove
described curve having o radius of 800.00 feet;
Thence northeasterly along said curve through o central angle of 28'59'45"
on arc distance of 419.71 feet;
Thence tangent to said curve North 49'06'40" East o distance of
479.2.3 feet to the aforesaid easterly line of Parcel 1;
Thence North 40'53'20" West olong sold eosterly line o distonce of
59.00 feet to the point of beginning.
Containing o computed area of 1.75 acres, more or less.
PREPARED FOR
AND ON BEHALF OF
SOUTHWEST SURVEYS
CITY OF TEMECULA
OFFER OF DEDICATION - ROAD PURPOSF~
The undersigned. being the present title owner(s) of record of the herein described parcel of !and, do hereby make an
irrevocable offer of dedication to the City of Temecula, a political subdivision of the State of California, and its successc
or assigns, for street and highway purposes, the real property situated in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State
California. described in Exhibit "A (written description) and shown on Exhibit "B" (plat map) attached hereto.
It is understood and agreed that the City of Temecula and its successors or assigns shall incur no liability with respect to
such offer of dedication, and shall not assume any responsibilityfor the offered parcel of land or any improvements thereon
or therein. until such offer has been accepted by appropriate action of the City Council, or of the local governing bodies or
its successors or assigns.
The provisions hereof shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon heirs, successors, assigns, and personal
representatives of the respective parties hereto. Westside Business Centre,
IN WITNESS Ti-~.EREOF, these pr~sen!.,s haye executed this instrument
this day of /'¢/9,c,'/ ,
STATE OF CALIFORNIA }
COUN~ OF RIVERSIDE}
On ~- /& - ~ ~ , before me the undemigned,
a Nmar~Public in and for lhe State of California, pemonally appeared
personally known to me (or proveto me on the basis of
satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are
subscribed to Ihe within instrument and acknowledged to me that
he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacily(ies)
and that by his/herllheir signature(s) on the instrument the pemon(s),
ar the emitv u.on behalf of which the ~erson(sl acted. execuled
instrument.
LLC
Dendy Real F. state & Investment
Corn paj>~, Manager
By:///~41 ~_j~d~ PrUdent ~ ~
Secretary
ACCEPTANCE CERTIFICATE
The Cily Council. City of Temecula hereby accepts the grant or' real property as set forth above.
CITY OF TEMECULA
ATTEST:
By:
Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor
BY:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
BY:
Peter M. Thorson. City Attorney
EXHIBIT
RIGHT OF WAY D ' IC,tTION NO.
A portion of Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 28084
Winchester Road
Being a portion of Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 28084 as shown by map on file in Book 185 of Parcel
Maps, at pages 51 through 53 thereof, records of Riverside County, California, being more particularly
described as follows:
Beginning at the most southerly corner of Parcel 2 of Parcel Map 4646 as shown by map on file
in book 6 of Parcel Maps, at page 75 thereof, records of Riverside County, California, said corner also
being on the centerline of Winchester Road;
Thence South 19°50'46" East along said centerline of Winchester Road, also being the
northeasterly line of said Parcel 1 of said Parcel Map 28084, a distance of 798.73 feet to the beginning
of a tangent curve, concave northeasterly, having a radius of 850.00 feet;
Thence continuing southeasterly along said curve, through a central angle of 09°18'06', an arc
distance of 137.99 feet;
Thence South 60°51 '08' West, a distance of 50.00 feet to the beginning of a non tangent curve,
concave northeasterly, having a radius of 900.00 feet, the initial radial line bearing South 60°51 '08"
West;
Thence continuing northerly along said curve, through a central angle of 09~18'06", an arc
distance of 146.11 feet, to a line parallel with ancl 50.00 feet southwesterly of the northerly line of said
Parcel 1 of said Parcel Ma~ 28084;
Thenca North 19°50'46" West, along said parallel line, a distance of 768.31 feet to the northerly
line of said Parcel 1;
Thence North 38°50'27" East, along said northerly line, a distance of 58.52 feet to the
Point of Beginning.
The above described parcel of land contains 46,279 square feet or 1.06 acres, more or less.
EXP. 12/31198
Prepared for and on
behalf of HLC
Date
......... OFFER OF DEDICATION - ROAD PURPO~E~
The undersigned, being the present title owner(s) of record of the herein d~,cribed parcel of land. do hereby make an
irrevocable offer of dedication to the City of Temecula, a tx)lifical sub&vision of the State of California, and i~ successo'
or assigns, for street and highway purposes, the real proper~y situated in the City of Temecula, Coumy of Riverside, Star
California, described in Exhibit "A (written description) and shown on Exhibit "B" (plat map) attached hereto.
It is understood and agreed that the City of Temecula and its successors or assigns shall incur no liability with respect to
such offer of dedication, and shall am assume any responsibility for the offered parcel of land or any improvements thereon
or therein, until such offer has been accepted by appropriate action of the City Council. or of the local governing bodies or
its successors or assigns.
The provisions hereof shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon heirs, successors, assigns, and personal
representatives of the respective parties hereto.
IN WITNESS THEREOF. lhese presents have executed this in.q.stm_mcnt
this ///,~ ~ day of /4tp~/'?. ,19 ~" /
STATE O?-CALIFORN1A } SS.
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE)
On 7--/-/~ '- ~ ') . before me the undersigned,
a NotaryPublic in ami, for the State of California, personally appeared
satisfactory evidence to be the p~Yrson(s) whose name(s) is/are
subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that
he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies)
and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s),
or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted. executed the
instrument.
al~a~ 1 ~"~'~
,.~sar~-vao~ Comm. #1059230
I~ ~ . ~ .~,MayaL1O~
ACCEPTANCE CERTIFICATE
Westside City Ii
Dendy Real Estate & Investment
ComE~ny, Manager .
~ il~~n~ ~e id~~./~
The City Council. City of Temecula hereby accepts the grant of real property as set forth above.
CITY OF TEMECULA
ATTEST:
By:
Patricia H. Birdsall. Mayor
BY:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
BY:
Peter M. Thorson. City Attorney
RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION
A Portion of Parcel 2 of Parcel Map 4646
Remington Avenue
Being a portion of Parcel 2 of Parcel Map 46~16 as shown by map on file in book 6 of Parcel Maps, at
page 75 thereof, records of Riverside County, California, being more particularly described as follows:
Commencing at the most southerly corner of said Parcel 2, being on the centerline of Winchester
Roadl
Thence North lg°50'46" West along said centerline of Winchester Road, also being the soutt~#esterly
line of said Parcel 2; a distance of 175.00 feet to the Point of Beginning
Thence North 19°50'46" West, continuing along said southwesterly line, a distance of 57.00 feetl
Thence North 70°0g'14" East, a distance of 50.00 feet;
Thence South 63037'38' East, a distance of 33.24 feet;
Thence North 70°09'14" East, a distance of 65.00 feet to tt~e beginning of a tangent curve, concave
southerly, having a radius of 839.00 feet;
Thence continuing easterly along said curve, through a central angle of 20°52'31", an arc distance of
305.68 feet;
Thence South 88°58'15" East, a distance of 41 37 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve, concave
northerly, having a radius of 761.00 feet;
Thence continuing easterly along said curve, through a central angle of 24°31 '23', an arc distance of
325.71 feet, to a line parallel with and 39.00 feet northwesterly of the southeasterly line of said Parcel 2;
Thence North 66030'22' East, along said parallel line, a distance of 433.25 feet to the beginning of a
tangent curve, concave northwesterly, having a radius of 1961.00 feet;
Thence leaving said parallel line and continuing northeasterly along said curve, through a central angle
of 21°23'39"1 an arc distance of 732.23 feet, to a line parallel with and 39.00 feet northwesterly of the
southeasterly line of said Parcel 2;
Thence North 45006'43" East, along said parallel line, a distance of 693.30 feet to the beginning of a
tangent curve, concave northwesterly, hav,ng a radius of 761.00 feet;
Thence leaving said parallel line and continuing northeasterly along said curve, through a central angle
of 07°51'35", an arc distance of 104.39 feet
Thence North 37015'08" East, a distance of 72.27 feet;
Thence North 08°34'11" West, a. distance of 33.00 feet to the southwesterly line of Diaz Road, 100.00
feet in width, 50.00 feet on eact3 side of centerline, as shown on said Parcel Map 4646, being the beginning of
a non tangent curve, concave northeasterly, having a radius of 4330.00 feet, the initial radial line bearing South
38004'53" West;
SHEET 1 OF 2
EXHIBIT
RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION
Thence continuing southeasterly along said curve and said southwesterly line, through a central angle
of 00°45'00", an arc distance of' 56.67 feet;
Thence leaving said southwesterly line, South 37°15'08' West, a distance of 94.82 feet to the
beginning of a tangent curve, concave northwesterly, having a radius of 794.00 feet;
Thence continuing southwesterly along said curve, through a central angle of 07°51 '35", an arc
distance of 108.92 feet to a line parallel with and 6.00 feet northwesterly of the southeasterly line of said Parcel
2;
Thence South 45006'43" West, along said parallet line, a distance of 693.30 feat to the beginning of a
tangent curve, concave northwesterly, having a radius of 1994.00 feet;
Thence leaving said parallel line and continuing southwesterly along said curve, through a central
angle of 21023'39", an arc distance of 744.56 feet, to a line parallel with and 6.00 feet northwesterly of the
southeasterly line of said Parcel 2;
Thence South 66°30'22" West, along said parallel line, a distance of 433.25 feet to the beginning of a
tangent curve, concave northwesterly, having a radius of 794.00 feet;
Thence continuing westerly along said curve, through a central angle of 24°31 '23', an arc distance of
339.84 feet;
Thence North 88°58'15' West, a distance of 41.37 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve, concave
northerly, having a radius of 806.00 feet;
Thence continuing westerly along said curve, through a central angle of 20°52'31", an arc distance of
293.66 feet;
Thence South 70°09'14" West, a distance of 138.00 feet to the Point of Beginning.
The above tiescribed parcel of land contains 96,729 square feet or 2.22 acres, more or less.
Damn P. Ginn, LS 7075
EXP. 12131198
Prepared for and on
behalf of HLC
SHEET 2 OF 2
Right-of Way Dedications for
Zevo Drive, Winchester Road and Remington Avenue
Plats
I~ :'~.AG DR.i~7~I~ I O\OF F~..DED. ~'T$ leila
r
EXHIBIT B-t~
COURSE DATA '
~0) BEARING//~)E~'rA LENG'I~ RADIUS TANGENT
1 28'39'4-5" 4-00.20' 800' 204-.58'
2 12'16'14-" 107.08' 500' 5,3.75'
N65'30'11"E 50.00'
6 28'39'45" 419.71' 859' 214.35'
7 N4.0'53'20"W 39.00'
PARCEL 1
P.,M, 18,.8/70-72
///
P.O B.~ // //PCL, 1
· ' /P.,M., 17.8
/ /85-'88
/
PArcEL 3
P.,M., 5/75
~ ZEVO DRIVE
(FORMERLY AVENIDA DE VENTAS)
SCALE: 1" = 200'
Vlcm~ ~ V~])
NO SC~L~
-- N65'01'11"E(R)
PARCEL 1
P.J\./J, 1..85/61-53
AREA OF RIGHT OF WAY
DEDICATION
PREPARED FOR
AND ON BEHALF OF
SOUTHWEST SURVEYS INC.
CITY OF TEMECULA
P,/GEIT
EXHIBIT B
OF WAY DEDICATION NO.
PARC~. I
POINT OF
BEGINNING
P4RCEZ. 3
PU 6/75
PARCEL 1
P~ 28084
AREA
46,279 SF
1.06 AC
INDICATES AREA OF RIGHT
OF WAY DEDICA T!ON
DARRIN P. GINN, L$ 7075
EXP. 12/,$I/98
PREPARED FOR AND
ON BEHALF OF' HLC
,I
EXHIBIT
RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION
POINT OF
.BEGINNING
POINT
COMMENCEMENT
~ =20~52'3~"~
T = 14.8.48'
L ,~ 293.66'
A =,24~J1°2~
T ~= 172.56'
~. = 3~9.~'_
20"52'31'
839.00'
154.56'
305.68'
~ " 24'31'23'
R '= 761.00'
T -, 165.39'
j..- z2~.~' PARCEL 2
6/z5
AR~'A
2.22 AC
PARCEL 3
PM 6/75
FUTURE REMINGTON
A VENUE, 78' RW
21~3'39"
1994.00'
376.67'
744.56'
'~ =, 21"25'39'
R =, 1961.00'
T ,= 370.43'
L - 732.23'
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
Z~/BEARiH~U .f ~!- DA 'I A
NO. RADIUS LENGTH TAN
N70~9'14'E 50.00'
S63'37'38'E 33.24'
3 N70'Og'14'E 65.00'
,~ .~,-q~a';5'F 41.37'
07'51'35-- 781.00' 104.3g' 52..28'
N37'IS'OS'E 72.27'
NOS'34'11'W 33.00'
10 07-~1'35' 794.00' 108.92'
11 N88 .?~8'15"W 41.37,
12 S70'09'~4'W 158.00'
13 N19.~O°46'W 57.00'
28.3
54.5~
INDICATES AREA
OF* WAY DEDICATION
OARRIN P. GINN, I.S 7075
EXP. 12/31/98
PRE~°ARED FOR AND
ON BEHALF' OF HLC
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPRr)VA! ~f~
CITY ATTORNEY ~
FINANCE DIRECI[GJ~'~
CITY MANAGER ~ ..
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
June 10, 1997
Accept Public Improvements in Tract No. 22915-2. (Northwesterly
corner of Intersection of Pauba Road at Butterfield Stage Road).
PREPARED BY: ~Ronald J. Parks, Principal Engineer - Land Development
/~Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
City Council ACCEPT the Public Improvements in Tract No 22915-2, AUTHORIZE the initiation
of the one-year warranty period, reduction of the Faithful Performance Street, and Water and
Sewer security amounts, and release of the Subdivision Monument security, and DIRECT the
City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Surety.
BACKGROUND:
On May 8, 1990, the Riverside County Road Commissioner and Deputy Clerk of the Board of
Supervisors approved Tract No. 22915-2 on behalf of the City of Temecula. Subdivision
Agreements and Surety Bonds were submitted by:
Tayco (Joint Venture of Taylor Woodrow & Costain Homes, Inc.)
for the improvement of streets, installation of sewer and water systems, and subdivision
monumentation. Accompanying the subdivision agreements were surety bonds posted by
American Home Assurance Company as follows:
1. Bond No. PB 300 11 964 in the amount of $1,792,000 to cover street improvements.
2. Bond No. PB300 11 964 in the amount of $109,500 to cover water improvements.
3. Bond No. PB 300 12 677 in the amount of $185,500 to cover sewer improvements.
4.. Bond No. PB 300 11 965 in the amount of $40,000 to cover subdivision
monumentation.
Bonds No. PB 300 11 964 in the total amount of $1,043,750 to cover materials and
labor for street, water, and sewer improvements.
R:~,AGDRPT~97~0610\TR2291 $2.ACC
Effective December 31, 1993, Costain Homes Inc. withdrew from the joint venture partnership.
The subject Tract 22916-3 was one of three for which Costain Homes Inc. became the sole
developer. Costain Homes Inc. executed a new agreement and substituted new bonds in the
full amount. On June 14, 1994, the City Council authorized partial reduction in the faithful
performance security amounts, and accepted the following substituted bond in the appropriate
reduced amounts as posted by American Motorists Insurance Company:
Bond No. 3SM 802 895 00 in the total amount of $730,625 for Faithful Performance
for streets, water and sewer improvements.
The subdivider also posted replacement bonds for the full amount for the following items:
Bond No. 3SM 802 895 00 in the total amount of $1,043,750 for Labor and Materials
for streets, water, and sewer improvements.
Bond No. 3SM 802 669 00 in the amount of $40,000 for subdivision monumentation.
The work has now been completed and Eastern Municipal and Rancho California Water
Districts, and the Riverside County Flood Control & Water Conservation Districts have accepted
their items of work. Public Works Staff therefore recommends acceptance of the public
improvements, reduction in Faithful Performance security amounts to the ten-percent warranty
level, and initiation of the one-year warranty period.
Therefore it is appropriate to reduce the Faithful Performance security to the following ten-
percent (10%) warranty amount:
Street, water, and sewer improvements Bond No. 3SM 802 895 00 $179,250
The subdivision monumentation requirements have been met, and Staff therefore recommends
release of the following security:
Bond No. 3SM 802 669 00 in the amount of $40,000 for subdivision monumentation.
The affected streets are being accepted into the City Maintained-Street System by City Council
Resolution No. 97- at this time. The streets within the subdivision to be accepted are
Camino Casana, Corte Lara, Corte Palacio, Via Baldarama, and portions of Camino Nunez,
Rancho Vista Road, Via Valdez, and Butterfield Stage Road.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
Attachment:
Location Map
R:~AGDRPT~97\O610~TR229152.ACC
VICINITY MAP
Tract Map No. ~915-~
i-~oca_tion,Man
NOTE~: MAPS NOT TO SCAI,E
.
· ..
. ,
I'I'EM 7
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPRnVA!
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE DIREC~
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
June 10, 1997
Acceptance of Public Streets into the City Maintained-Street System
(Within Tracts No. 22915-2 and 22915-3). (Southwesterly of the
intersection of Rancho Vista Road at Butterfield Stage Road)
PREPARED BY:/~ Ronald J. Parks, Principal Engineer - Land Development
Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 97-_
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE
CITY MAINTAINED-STREET SYSTEM, {WITHIN TRACTS NO.
22915-2 AND 22915-3)
BACKGROUND:
The Riverside County Road Commissioner and Deputy Clerk of the Riverside County Board of
Supervisors approved Tracts No. 22915-2 and 22915-3 on May 8, 1990, on behalf of the City
of Temecula and entered into Subdivision Agreements for construction of street, water and
sewer improvements with Tayco (Joint Venture of Taylor Woodrow Homes & Costain Homes
Inc.), now Costain Homes Inc.
The City Council accepted the public improvements for these tracts on June 10, 1997.
The public streets now being accepted by this action are:
Tract No. 22915-2: Corte Palacio, Via Baldarama, Corte Lara, Camino Casana, and
portions of Via Vasquez, Camino Nunez, Rancho Vista Road, and Butterfield Stage Road.
Tract No. 22915-3: Corte Fiorecita, and portions of Camino De La Torre and Camino
Nunez.
R:~AGDRPT~97~0610\TR229152.3ST
FISCAl IMPACT:
Periodic surface and/or structural maintenance will be required every 5 to 8 years.
AttAchments:
Resolution No. 97- with Exhibits "A-B", inclusive.
R:~AGDRPT~97\06! 0\TR229152.3ST
RESOLUTION NO. ~/-
A RESOLUTION OF ~ CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY
OF TEM~-~0LA ACCEl'lING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS
INTO ~ CITY IN AINED-STRI~T SYSTEM (WITHIN
TRACT NO. 229152 AND 22915-3
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TI~vITzCULA DOES RESOLVE, DE'rERM]NE AND
ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, The Riverside County Road Commissioner and Deputy Clerk of the
Riverside County Board of Supervisors, on behalf of the City of Temecula, accepted offers of
dedication of ~ lots for public road and public utility purposes made by Tayco (Joint Venture
of Taylor Woodrow Homes & Costain Homes Inc.), now Costain Homes Inc., with the
recordation of Tract Maps No. 22915-2 and 22915-3; and,
WHb'~EAS, The City of Temecula accepted the improvements within Tracts No 22915-2
and 22915-3 on June 10, 1997.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVe, that the City Council of the City of
Temecula hereby accepts into the City Maintained-Street System those streets or portions of streets
offered to and accepted by the City of Temecula described in Exhibits 'A' and 'B" attached
hereto.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula
at a regular meeting held on the 10th day of June, 1997.
Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor
ATI'F~T:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
R:~AGDRPT~97~0610~TR229152.3ST
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMEC~A )
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that
Resolution No. 97- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 10th day of June, 1997, by the following vote:
0 COUNCILNIF3VIBERS:
NOES:
0 COUNCIL~ERS:
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCIL~F. RS:
R:~AGDRPT~97~O610~TR229152.3ST
r
EXHIB~ "A" TO RESOLUTION NO. 97-
Acce__pting the public streets offered to and accepted by the City
of Temeodn as indicated on Tract Maps No. 22915-2 and 22915-
3, and acee__.pting subject public streets into the City Maintained-
Street System as described below:
Tract M~tp No. 2~91 5.~:
Those lots described as Lots "A" through 'H", as shown on
Tract Map No. 22915.2, filed on the 8th of May, 1990, in Book
217 of Maps, Pgs $1-59 inclusive, further described as follows:
Lot "A"*
Lot "B"
Lot 'C'
Lot"D"
Lot 'E"
Lot 'F"
LOt "G"
Lot "H"
Portion of Butterfield Stage Road
Portion of Rancho Vista Road
Via Baldarama
Cnmlno Casana
Corte Lara
Corte Palncio
Portion of Via Vasquez
Portion of Camino Nunez
Tract M~p No. ~915.3:
Those lots described as LOts "B", 'C", and "D" as shown on Tract Map No.
22915.3, filed on the 8th of May, 1990, in Book 217 of Maps, Pgs 60-66
inclusive, further described as follows:
Lot "A'**
Lot "B"
Lot "C"
Lot "D"
Portion of Meadows Parkway
Corte Florecita
Portion of Camino Nunez
Portion of Camino De La Torre
* Butterfield Stage Road was accepted into the City Maintained-Street System by City
Council Resolution No. 95-29 on March 28, 1995.
** Meadows Parkway will not be accepted into the City Maintained-Street System until
Community Facilities District No. 88-3 and Assessment District No. 159 accept their portions
of the improvements.
R:~AGDRI=T~97\O610~.TR229152.3ST
F.~H~IT ~B~ TO RESOLITrION NO. 97-
SUBJECT ACCEPTANCE -PUBLIC S~S INTO ~ CITY
MAINT~S~ET SYSTEM AS INDICATED BELOW:
VICINITY MAP
NOTE: MAPS NOT TO SCALE
I J~.GEND
STREETS OR PORTIONS OF ~
TO BE ACCEFI'ED INTO CITY
MAINTAINED-STREET SYSTEM
APPRt~VA!
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE DI"EC~O~.~
CITY MANAGER J~' ~~
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
City Council/City Manager -
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
June 10, 1997
SUBJECT:
Accept Public Improvements in Tract No. 22915-3. (Southwesterly
corner of Intersection of Rancho Vista Road at Butterfield Stage Road).
PREPARED BY: /'~ Ronald J. Parks, Principal Engineer - Land Development
' Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
City Council ACCEPT the Public Improvements in Tract No 22915-3, AUTHORIZE the initiation
of the one-year warranty period, reduction of the Faithful Performance Street, and Water and
Sewer security amounts, and release of the Subdivision Monument security, and DIRECT the
City Clerk to so advise the Developer and Surety.
BACKGROUND:
On May 8, 1990, the Riverside County Road Commissioner and Deputy Clerk of the Board of
Supervisors approved Tract No. 22915-2 on behalf of the City of Temecula. Subdivision
Agreements and Surety Bonds were submitted by:
Tayco (Joint Venture of Taylor Woodrow & Costain Homes, Inc.)
for the improvement of streets, installation of sewer and water systems, and subdivision
monumentation. Accompanying the subdivision agreements were surety bonds posted by
American Home Assurance Company as follows:
1. Bond No. PB 300 11 967 in the amount of $907,000 to cover street improvements.
2. Bond No. PB 300 11 967 in the amount of $67,000 to cover water improvements.
3. Bond No. PB 300 11 967 in the amount of $110,000 to cover sewer improvements.
4.. Bond No. PB 300 11 968 in the amount of $26,400 to cover subdivision
monumentation.
Bonds No. PB 300 11 967 in the total amount of $542,000 to cover materials and
labor for street, water, and sewer improvements.
R:~GDRP'T~97~0610~TR220153.ACC
Effective December 31, 1993, Costain Homes Inc. withdrew from the joint venture partnership.
The subject Tract 22915-3 was one of three for which Costain Homes Inc. became the sole
developer. Costain Homes Inc. executed a new agreement and substituted new bonds in the
full amount. On June 14, 1994, the City Council authorized partial reduction in the faithful
performance security amounts, and accepted the following substituted bond in the appropriate
reduced amount as posted by American Motorists insurance Company:
Bond No. 3SM 802 894 00 in the total amount of $504,200 for Faithful Performance
for streets, water and sewer improvements.
The subdivider also posted replacement bonds for the full amount for the following items:
Bond No. 3SM 802 894 O0 in the total amount of $542,000 for Labor and Materials
for streets, water, and sewer improvements.
Bond No. 3SM 802 670 00 in the amount of $26,400 for subdivision monumentation.
The work has now been completed and Eastern Municipal and Rancho California Water
Districts, and the Riverside County Flood Control & Water Conservation Districts have accepted
their items of work. Public Works Staff therefore recommends acceptance of the public
improvements, reduction in Faithful Performance security amounts to the ten-percent warranty
level, and initiation of the one-year warranty period.
Therefore it is appropriate to reduce the Faithful Performance security to the following ten-
percent (10%) warranty amount:
Street, water, and sewer improvements Bond No. 3SM 802 894 00 $108,400
The subdivision monumentation requirements have been met, and Staff therefore recommends
release of the following security:
Bond No. 3SM 802 670 00 in the amount of $26,400 for subdivision monumentation.
The affected streets are being accepted into the City Maintained-Street System by City Council
Resolution No. 97- at this time. The streets within the subdivision to be accepted are Corte
Florecita, and portions of Camino Nunez, and Camino De La Torre.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
Attachment:
Location Map
R:~a, GDRFT~97~0610~TR229153.ACC
MAP
Tract Man No.
Location Mag
NOTE: MAPS NOT TO SCALP.
·
,..
· ,
fI~EM 9
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPRnVAI
CITY ATTORNEY
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
June 10, 1997
Release Warranty and Labor and Materials Bonds in Tract No. 23126.
(Southerly of Intersection of Nicolas Road at Roripaugh Road)
PREPARED BY: ~ Ronald J. Parks, Principal Engineer - Land Development
~' Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council AUTHORIZE the release of the Faithful Performance Warranty Bond Riders
for Street, Drainage, and Water and Sewer Improvements, and the Labor and Material Bonds
in Tract No. 23126, and DIRECT the City Clerk to so advise the Clerk of the Board of
Supervisors, the developer and surety.
BACKGROUND:
On November 7, 1989, the Riverside County Board of Supervisors entered into subdivision
agreements with:
Barratt American Incorporated,
c/o Coscan Davidson Homes
12865 Pointe Del Mar
Del Mar, CA 92014
for the improvement of streets, installation of sewer and water systems, and subdivision
monumentation. Accompanying the subdivision agreements were surety bonds issued by The
American Insurance Company as follows:
1. Bond No. 11127029103 in the amount of $111,500 to cover street improvements.
2. Bond No. 11127029111 in the amount of $22,000 to cover water system
improvements.
3. Bond No. 11127029129 in the amount of $24,000 to cover sewer system
improvements.
Bonds No. 11127029103, 11127029111, and 11127029129 in the amount of
$55,750, $11,000, and $12,000, respectively, to cover material and labor for street,
water, and sewer improvements.
r.~agdq=t\97~0610\tr23126f.inl
5. Bond No. 11127029137 in the amount of $9,800 to cover subdivision monumentation.
On February 13, 1996, the City Council accepted the public improvements, initiated the one-
year warranty period, authorized release of the subdivision monumentation bond, and accepted
the faithful performance bond riders, changing the obligee' from Riverside County to the City
of Temecula, and reducing the bond amounts for Faithful Performance warranty purposes to
the following amounts:
Street and Drainage Improvements Bond No. 11127029103
Water System Improvements Bond No. 11127029111
Sewer System Improvements Bond No. 11127029129
$11,150
$ 2,200
$ 2,400
Public Works staff has reviewed the project in the field and all necessary repairs/replacements
have been satisfactorily completed. Staff therefore recommends the release of the Faithful
Performance warranty securities.
The developer was required to post Material and Labor Bonds to ensure payment to suppliers
and workers. These bonds are maintained in effect for a period of time determined by statute
after the Governmental Agency has accepted the public improvements. No claims having been
filed against the developer for either labor or materials, Staff recommends the release of the
following labor and materials bonds:
Street and Drainage Improvements
Water System Improvements
Sewer System Improvements
Bond No. 11127029103
Bond No. 11127029111
Bond No. 11127029129
$55,750
$11,000
$12,000
The affected street, Sweet Brier Circle, was accepted into the City Maintained-Street System
by City Council Resolution No. 96-14.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
AttAchment:
Location Map
r:.\egdrpt~97\0610\t~23126f.inl
~0
,J
I$
VZCZNZ TY NAP
TRACT NO. 23126
Location
Map
NOTE: MAPS NOT TO SCALE
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
APPRnVA!
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE DIREC~~
CITY MANAGERial_
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
June 10, 1997
Accept Public Improvements in Tract No. 27827-3 (Northwesterly of
intersection of North General Kearny Road at Nicolas Road)
PREPARED BY: /~ Ronald J. Parks, Principal Engineer - Land Development
Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
City Council ACCEPT the Public Improvements in Tract No. 27827-3, AUTHORIZE release of
Faithful Performance Street and Water and Sewer System Bond amounts, release of the
Subdivision Monumentation Bond, and initiation of the warranty period, and DIRECT the City
Clerk to so advise the Developer and Surety.
BACKGROUND:
The City Council approved Tract Map No. 27827-3 on January 24, 1995, and entered into
agreements with:
Coscan Homes California, Inc., a California Corporation
Doing Business as Coscan Davidson Homes.
12865 Pointe Del Mar, Suite 200
Del Mar, CA 92014
for the improvement of streets, water and sewer system, and subdivision monumentation. The
bonds were posted by Reliance Insurance Company as follows:
1. Bond No. B2482393/111126 in the amount of $339,500, ($244,000, $49,000,
and $46,500, respectively) for street, water and sewer system improvements.
2. Bond No. B2482393/111126 in the amount of $169,750 ($122,000, $24,500,
and $23,250, respectively) for street, water and sewer system labor and
materials.
3. Bond No. B2482395/111128 in the amount of $13,284 to cover subdivision
monumentation.
-1-
r.\agd~pt~97~O61 O~tr278273.ac=
Bond No. B2482394/111127 in the amount of $33,950 to cover faithful
performance warranty amount.
The following items have been completed by the developer in accordance with the approved
plans:
Street, Water and Sewer System improvements within Tract No 27827-3.
Subdivision Monumentation.
Staff has inspected and verified the public improvements and the subdivision monumentation.
The Rancho California and Eastern Municipal Water Districts have accepted their items of work.
The Public Works Department therefore recommends acceptance of the public improvements,
release of the faithful performance bond and the monumentation bond, reduction in faithful
performance security amounts to the 10-percent warranty level for which separate bonding was
submitted at map approval, and initiation of the one-year warranty period.
Therefore it is appropriate to reduce the Faithful Performance Bond amount as follows:
Street, Water and Sewer System improvements:
$305,550
and release the following bonds:
Faithful Performance
Subdivision Monumentation:
Bond No. B2482393/111126
Bond No. B2482395/111128
$339,50O
$13,284
The Faithful Performance Warranty Bond (No. B2482394/111127) will be retained in the
following amount:
Street, Water and Sewer System improvements:
$33,950
The developer was required to post Labor and Materials Bond to ensure payment to suppliers
and workers. This bond is maintained for six-months after the City Council accepts the public
improvements.
The public streets within this tract are being accepted into the City Maintained-Street System
by City Council Resolution No. 97- at this time. The streets to be accepted are portions of
June Road, April Drive, Parkside Drive, and two alleys.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
Attachment:
Location Map
-2- rAagdrpt~97\0610~tr278273.acc
c! T¥ OF ?FJ'~CuLA
VICINITY ~
PeR. LOT 18,1 ---
rl.8. 8/3~g
_-=.~?;~=g-~_L= ' ",'" ,' ,' ,'0,",,.~,,;.',.:..;~;',",-'. :-.~~I ./ .~.~ ~ '
~ - ~ ~ ~'~*'o,-. o-- -/ ....... ~. ~'~'~~ ' ~0:o~TM
l~ ~ ~._ - ...... ~ X ~- - / -, ~ ~ 1
,b ~ ~1~ ................. / ~ ~% ~ /
: ~ract MaD No. 27877=3
",ocation Mau
NOTE: MAPS NOT TO SCALE
,.~°
· ,
I~I'EM 11
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAl
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE DIREC~O~
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
June 10, 1997
Acceptance of Public Streets into the City Maintained-Street System
(Within Tract No. 27827-3) (Northwesterly of intersection of Nicolas
Road at North General Kearny Road)
PREPARED BY: ~ Ronald J. Parks, Principal Engineer - Land Development
Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 97-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS
INTO THE CITY MAINTAINED-STREET SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACT
NO. 27827-3)
BACKGROUND:
The City Council approved Tract No. 27827-3 on January 24, 1995, and entered into
Subdivision Agreements for construction of street, water and sewer system improvements and
subdivision monumentation with Coscan Homes California, a California Corporation, doing
business as Coscan Davidson Homes.
On June 10, 1997, the City Council accepted the public improvements for this tract.
The public streets now being accepted by this action are portions of June Road, Parkside Drive,
April Drive, and two alleys.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Periodic surface and/or structural maintenance will be required every 5 to 8 years.
ATTACHMENTS:
Resolution No. 97- with Exhibits "A-B", inclusive.
r.\agdrpt\97~0610\tr278273.~t.
RESOLUTION NO. 97-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CERTAIN
PUBLIC STRk'~FS INTO THE CITY MAINTAINEI~-STREET
SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACT NO. 27827-3)
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF 'rEMECLR.A DOES RESOLVE, D~ AND
ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, The City Council of the City of Temecula accepted an offer of dedication
of certain lots for street and public utility purposes made by Coscan Homes California, a
California Corporation doing business as Coscan Davidson Homes, with the recordation of Tract
Map No. 27827-3; and,
W!~7~F_AS, The City of Temecula accepted the improvements within Tract No 27827-3
on June 10, 1997.
NOW, TFIEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVI~D, that the City Council of the City of
Temecula hereby accepts into the City Maintained-Street System those meets or portions of streets
offered to and accepted by the City of Temecula described in Exhibits "A" and "B" attached
hereto.
PASSK'~, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula
at a regular meeting held on the 10th day of June, 1997.
Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
rAegdrpt\97\0610~,tr278273.sta
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )
CITY OF TI~V~CULA )
$$
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that
Resolution No. 97- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 10th day of June, 1997, by the following vote:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
0 COUNC]I.MEMBERS:
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMF_2V~ERS:
ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCIL~F_2,S:
r.\agdmt\g7~0610~tr278273.
~IT *A~ TO RESOLUTION NO. 97-
Accepting the public streets offered to and accepted by the City
of Temecula as indicated on Tract Map No. 2782%3, and
acceptin_~ subject public streets into the City M~intained-Street
System as described below:
Those lots described as Lots "A" through "E" inclusive, as
shown on Tract Map No. 27827-3, f'ded 10 February 1995, in
Book 252 of Maps, Pgs 11-14 Incl., further described as follows:
Lot
Lot
Lot
Lot
Lot
Portion of June Road
Portion of Parkside Drive
Portion of April Drive
Portion of Alley
Portion of Alley
c~=gdrpt\97\0610\tr278273. =t=
EXHIBIT "B" TO RESOLUTION NO. 97-
SUBJECT ACCEPTANCE -PUBLIC STREETS INTO ~ CITY
MAINTAINED-STREET SYSTEM AS I]qDICATED BELOW:
' VICINITY MAP
NOTE: MAPS NOT TO SCALE
STRF..E'~ OR PORTIONS OF STREETS
TO BE ACCEPTED INTO CITY
MAINTA~.ED-~TREET $YST'E~
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
APPRt3VA!
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE DIRECT~R.r~._~
City Council/City Manager
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
June 10, 1997
"All-Way Stop" - Calle Halcon at Eiinda Road
PREPARED BY: {~)Ali Moghadam, Associate Engineer - Capital Projects/Traffic
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 97-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ESTABLISHING 'ALL-WAY STOP" LOCATION ON
CALLE HALCON AND ELINDA ROAD
BACKGROUND:
The City received a request from a resident of the area to establish an "All-Way Stop" at the
intersection of Calle Halcon and Eiinda Road. This request was made due to the restricted
visibility caused by a relatively sharp curve on Elinda Road south of Calle Halcon.
Both Calle Halcon and Elinda Road are residential streets with low traffic volumes. Although
no accidents have been reported at this intersection, due to the very limited sight distance,
installation of an "All-Way Stop" is recommended at this intersection.
This item was reviewed by the Public/Traffic Safety Commission on May 22, 1997 and the
Commission recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution establishing an "All-Way
Stop" at the intersection of Calle Halcon and Elinda Road. Some residents of the area attended
this meeting and supported the proposed "Stop" sign installation.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Funds are available in the Public Works Department Signs Account No. 001-164-601-5244 and
Striping/Stenciling Account No. 001-164-601-5410.
Attachments:
1. Resolution No. 97-
2. Exhibit "A"- Location Map
RESOLUTION NO. 9%
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING "ALL-WAY STOP"
LOCATION ON CALLE HALCON AND ELINDA ROAD
The City Council of the City of Temecula does resolve, determine and order as follows:
Section 1. Pursuant to Section 10.12.100, of the Temecula Municipal Code, the
following "STOP" sign location is hereby established in the City of Temecula.
Calle Halcon at Elinda Road
Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula
at a regular meeting held on the 10th day of June, 1997.
ATTEST:
Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor
June S. Greek, City Clerk
r Aa~97X0610~-IALCO N ...qTP/tj~
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do certify that the foregoing
Resolution No. 97- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Temecula on the 10th day of June, 1997 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: 0
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 0
ABSTAIN: 0
C OUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
r:~drp~l ~/V~ I 0~HALCON .STP/ejp
~CMO CALiFORNiA
ROAD
REQUEST FOR ALL-WAY STOP
I~I'EM
13
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
APPROVA,
CITY ATTORNEY flJ4~
FINANCE DIRECT~
CITY MANAGER ~)~~
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Council/City Manager
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
June 10, 1997
"No Parking" Zones on Rancho California Road, Winchester Road, Pala
Road, Santiago Road, Pauba Road and Rancho Vista Road
PREPARED BY: ~Ali Moghadam, Associate Engineer- Capital Projects/Traffic
RECOMMENDATION:
The Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution
entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 97-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ESTABLISHING 'NO PARKING" ZONES ON RANCHO
CALIFORNIA ROAD, WINCHESTER ROAD, PALA ROAD,
SANTIAGO ROAD, PAUBA ROAD AND RANCHO VISTA ROAD AS
SHOWN ON EXHIBIT
BACKGROUND:
The Public/Traffic Safety Commission directed the Traffic Division staff to review the existing
on-street parking and parking restriction on the City's circulation streets for safety, consistency
and operational efficiency.
Staff reviewed the parking situation and recommended that parking be restricted on the
following circulation streets.
· Rancho California Road from Ynez Road to Moraga Road and from Margarita Road to
east City limits.
· Winchester Road from Jefferson Avenue to its westerly end.
· Pala Road from SR 79(S) to Wolff Valley Road
Santiago Road from Front Street to Ynez Road
· Pauba Road from Ynez Road to Butterfield Stage Road
· Rancho Vista Road from Ynez Road to Butterfield Stage Road
-1- r:. ~ngdrpt\97\0610~nopnrkin. vtr/ajp
At the April 24, 1997 meeting of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission, the Commission
reviewed staff's recommendation and recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution
to establish no parking zones on these circulation streets. It should be noted that segments of
these roadways are not currently improved to the ultimate width and will not be posted as no
parking at this time.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Funds are available in the Department of Public Works Striping/Stenciling Account No. 001-
164-601-5410.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution No. 97-
2. Exhibit "A" - Proposed Parking Restriction
-2- r:.~gdrpt\97\0610knoparkin.v~/ajp
RESOLUTION NO. 97-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING "NO PARKING" ZONES
ON RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, WINCHESTER ROAD,
PALA ROAD, SANTIAGO ROAD, PAUBA ROAD AND
RANCHO VISTA ROAD AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT "A".
The City Council of the City of Temecula does resolve, determine and order as follows:
Section 1. Pursuant to Section 10.12.100, of the Temecula Municipal Code, "No
Parking" zones are hereby established in the City of Temecula on Rancho Califomia Road,
Winchester Road, Pala Road, Santiago Road, Pauba Road and Rancho Vista Road as shown on
Exhibit "A".
Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula
at a regular meeting held on the 10th day of June, 1997.
Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
-3- r:~agdrpt\97~0610~noparkin.var/ajp
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do certify that the foregoing
Resolution No. 97- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Temecula on the 10th day of June, 1997 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: 0
NOES: 0
ABSTAIN: 0
ABSENT: 0
C OUNCILMEMBERS:
C OUNCILMEMBERS:
C OUNCILIVIEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
r:. \agd~t\97~0610~noparkin. var/ajp
X
LLI
EX/~IBIT "A"
ROAO
,...-
· .
i~iEM 14
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL /,'J~..~,--
CITY ATTORNEY ~'/4~
FINANCE DIREC~'?!~ .~
CITY MANAGEF~~~
CiTY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
-~Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
June 10, 1997
Award of Construction Contract for Installation of an Interim Traffic
Signal at State Route 79 South and Bedford Court
PREPARED BY: Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects
~) All Moghadam, Associate Engineer - Capital Projects/Traffic
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council:
Award a contract for installation of an interim traffic signal at State Route 79 South and
Bedford Court, Project No. PW96-17 to DBX, Inc. in the amount of $89,121.00 and
authorize the Mayor to execute the contract.
Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency
amount of $8,912.10 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount.
BACKGROUND:
On March 18, 1997, the City Council approved the construction plans and specifications and
authorized the Department of Public Works to solicit public construction bids for installation of
an interim traffic signal at the intersection of State Route 79 South (SR 79(S)) and Bedford
Court, Project No. PW96-17.
This project includes installation of an interim three-way traffic signal and minor signing and
striping at this intersection. The interim traffic signal at this intersection will be replaced upon
widening of SR 79(S) by the County Assessment District 159 Phase II. This traffic signal will
also be interconnected and the timing will be coordinated with the nearby traffic signal at the
intersection of SR 79(S) and La Paz Street. The signal timing coordination on SR 79(S)
between the intersections of Bedford Court and Pala Road is crucial in maintaining an
acceptable level of service on this segment of the State Highway.
R:~GDRPT~97~0610~VV98- 17 .AWDINp
The engineer's estimate for this project was $110,000.00
Seven (7) bids were publicly opened on May 22, 1997, and the results for the bid are as
follows:
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7
DBX, Inc .................................... $ 89
Computer Service Company ....................... $ 89
Paul Gardner Corp .............................. ~ 93
Peek Traffic .................................. $ 95
Leekos Electric, Inc ............................. $ 96
Sierra Pacific ................................. $ 101
HMS Construction ............................. $ 109
121.00
447.00
769.00
700.00
442.00
400.00
Staff has reviewed the bid documents for compliance with City requirements and have
determined that DBX, Inc. is the lowest responsible bidder for this project. DBX, Inc. has
completed several other projects for the City in the past, including installation of traffic signals
at SR 79(S)/Margarita Road, SR 79(S)/La Paz Street and Margarita Road/Rustic Glen Drive, with
satisfactory results.
The specifications allow ninety (90) working days for completion of this project. Work is
expected to be completed by December, 1997.
A copy of the bid summary is available for review in the City Engineer's office.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Adequate funds are available in the Capital Improvement Budget Account No. 210-165-675-
5804.
ATTACHMENTS:
Contract
R:'~AGDRPT'~7\0610M:~V96-17 .AWD/~jp
CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
CONTRACT
FOR
PROJECT NO. PW96-17
TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION
A T STATE ROUTE 79 SOUTH AND BEDFORD COURT
THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into the 10th day of June, 1997, by and between
the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CITY", and DBX, Inc.,
hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR."
WITNESSETH:
That CITY and CONTRACTOR, for the consideration hereinafter named, mutually agree
as follows:
CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The complete Contract includes all of the Contract
Documents, to wit: Notice Inviting Bids, Instructions to Bidders, Proposal, Performance
Bond, Labor and Materials Bond, Plans and Specifications entitled PROJECT NO. PW96-
17 TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION AT STATE ROUTE 79 SOUTH AND BEDFORD
COURT, Insurance Forms, this Contract, and all modifications and amendments thereto,
the State of California Department of Transportation Standard Specifications (1992 Ed.)
where specifically referenced in the Plans and Technical Specifications, and the latest
version of the Standard SDecifications for Public Works Construction, including all
supplements as written and promulgated by the Joint Cooperative Committee of the
Southern California Chapter of the American Associated General Contractors of
California (hereinafter, "Standard Specifications") as amended by the General
Specifications, Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO. PW96-
17 TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION AT STATE ROUTE 79 SOUTH AND BEDFORD
COURT. Copies of these Standard Specifications are available from the publisher:
Building News, Incorporated
3055 Overland Avenue
Los Angeles, California 90034
(213) 202-7775
The Standard Specifications will control the general provisions, construction materials,
and construction methods for this Contract except as amended by the General,
Specifications, Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO. PW96-
17 TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION AT STATE ROUTE 79 SOUTH AND BEDFORD
COURT.
In case of conflict between the Standard Specifications and the other Contract
Documents, the other Contract Documents shall take precedence over and be used in
lieu of such conflicting portions.
Where the Contract Document describe portions of the work in general terms, but not
in complete detail, it is understood that the item is to be furnished and installed
CONTRACT
r:\cip\projects\pw96\pw96-17\contract.wpd/ajp
completed and in place and that only the best general practice is to be used. Unless
otherwise specified, the CONTRACTOR shall furnish all labor, materials, tools,
equipment, and incidentals, and do all the work involved in executing the Contract.
The Contract Documents are complementary, and what is called for by anyone shall be
as binding as if called for by all. Any conflict between this Contract and any other
Contract Document shall be resolved in favor of this Contract.
SCOPE OF WORK. CONTRACTOR shall perform everything required to be performed,
shall provide and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment,
and all utility and transportation services required for the following:
PROJECT NO. PW96-17
TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION
AT STATE ROUTE 79 SOUTH AND BEDFORD COURT
All of said work to be performed and materials to be furnished shall be in strict
accordance with the Drawings and Specifications and the provisions of the Contract
Documents hereinabove enumerated and adopted by CITY.
CITY APPROVAL. All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be furnished
and work performed and completed under the direction and supervision and subject to
the approval of CITY or its authorized representatives.
CONTRACT AMOUNT AND SCHFDU! F. CITY agrees to pay and CONTRACTOR agrees
to accept in full payment for the work above-agreed to be done, the sum of: EIGHTY
NINE THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED TWENTY ONE DOLLARS and NO CENTS
($89,121.00), the total amount of the base bid.
CONTRACTOR agrees to complete the work in a period not to exceed NINETY (90)
working days, commencing with delivery of Notice to Proceed by CITY. Construction
shall not commence until bonds and insurance are approved by CITY.
CHANGE ORDERS. All change orders shall be approved by the City Council, except that
the City Manager is hereby authorized by the City Council to make, by written order,
changes or additions to the work in an amount not to exceed the contingency as
established by the City Council.
PAYMENTS.
LUMP SUM BID SCHEDULE:
Before submittal of the first payment request, the CONTRACTOR shall submit to
the City Engineer a schedule of values allocated to the various portions of the
work, prepared in such form and supported by such data to substantiate its
accuracy as the City Engineer may require. This schedule, as approved by the
City Engineer, shall be used as the basis for reviewing the CONTRACTOR's
payment requests.
CONTRACT
r:\cip\projects\pw96\pw96-17\contract. wpd/ajp
UNIT PRICE BID SCHEDULE:
Pursuant to Section 20104.50 of the Public Contracts Code, within thirty (30)
days after submission of a payment request to the City, the CONTRACTOR shall
be paid a sum equal to ninety percent (90%) of the value of the work completed
according to the bid schedule. Payment request forms shall be submitted on or
about the thirtieth (3Oth) day of each successive month as the work progresses.
The final payment, if unencumbered, or any part thereof unencumbered, shall be
made sixty (60) days after acceptance of final payment and the CONTRACTOR
filing a one-year Warranty and an Affidavit of Final Release with the CITY on
forms provided by the CITY.
Payments shall be made on demands drawn in the manner required by law,
accompanied by a certificate signed by the City Manager, stating that the work
for which payment is demanded has been performed in accordance with the
terms of the Contract, and that the amount stated in the certificate is due under
the terms of the Contract. Partial payments on the Contract price shall not be
considered as an acceptance of any part of the work.
Interest shall be paid on all undisputed payment requests not paid within 30 days
pursuant to Public Contracts Code Section 20104.50. Public Contracts Code
Section 7107 is hereby incorporated by reference.
WARRANTY RETENTION. Commencing with the date the Notice of Completion is
recorded, the CITY shall retain a portion of the Contract award price, to assure warranty
performance and correction of construction deficiencies according to the following
schedule:
CONTRACT AMOUNT
$25,000- $75,000
$75,000-$500,000
Over $500,000
RETENTION PERIOD
180 days
180 days
One Year
RETFNTION PERCFNTAGE
3%
$2,250 + 2% of amount in
excess of $75,000
$10,750 + 1% of amount
in excess of $500,000
o
LIQUIDATED DAMAGES: EXTENSION OF TIME. In accordance with Government Code
Section 53069.85, CONTRACTOR agrees to forfeit and pay to CITY the sum of One
Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00) per day for each calendar day completion is delayed
beyond the time allowed pursuant to Paragraph 4 of this Contract. Such sum shall be
deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. Such sum
shall be deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR.
CONTRACTOR will be granted an extension of time and will not be assessed liquidated
damages for unforeseeable delays beyond the control of and without the fault or
negligence of the CONTRACTOR including delays caused by CITY. CONTRACTOR is
required to promptly notify CITY of any such delay.
WAIVER OF CI AIMS. On or before making each request for payment under Paragraph
6 above, CONTRACTOR shall submit to CITY, in writing, all claims for compensation as
to work related to the payment. Unless the CONTRACTOR has disputed the amount of
CONTRACT
r:\cip\projects\pw96\pw96-17\contrect,w13d/ajp
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
the payment, the acceptance by CONTRACTOR of each payment shall constitute a
release of all claims against the CITY related to the payment. CONTRACTOR shall be
required to execute an affidavit, release and indemnity agreement with each claim for
payment.
PREVAIl ING WAIFS. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of
the State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per
diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each
craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contract, from the
Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. These rates are on file with the City
Clerk. Copies may be obtained at cost at the City Clerk's office of Temecula.
CONTRACTOR shall post a copy of such wage rates at the job site and shall pay the
adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. CONTRACTOR shall comply with the
provisions of Sections 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor
Code.
Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, CONTRACTOR shall forfeit to the
CITY, as a penalty, the sum of $25.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for
each laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing
rates for any work done under this Contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him,
in violation of the provisions of the Contract.
TIME OF THE ESSENCE. Time is of the essence in this contract.
INDEMNIFICATION. All work covered by this Contract done at the site of construction
or in preparing or delivering materials to the site shall be at the risk of CONTRACTOR
alone. CONTRACTOR agrees to save, indemnify, hold harmless and defend CITY, its
officers, employees, and agents, against any and all liability, injuries, or death of persons
(CONTRACTOR's employees included) and damage to property, arising directly or
indirectly out of the obligations herein undertaken or out of the operations conducted
by CONTRACTOR, save and except claims or litigations arising through the sole active
negligence or sole willful misconduct of the CITY.
GRATUITIES. CONTRACTOR warrants that neither it nor any of its employees, agents,
or representatives has offered or given any gratuities or promises to CITY's employees,
agents, or representatives with a view toward securing this Contract or securing
favorable treatment with respect thereto.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST. CONTRACTOR warrants that he has no blood or marriage
relationship, and that he is not in any way associated with any City officer or employee,
or any architect, engineer, or other preparers of the Drawings and Specifications for this
project. CONTRACTOR further warrants that no person in his/her employ has been
employed by the CITY within one year of the date of the Notice Inviting Bids.
CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT. After the completion of the work contemplated by this
Contract, CONTRACTOR shall file with the City Manager his affidavit stating that all
workmen and persons employed, all firms supplying materials, and all subcontractors
upon the Project have been paid in full, and that there are no claims outstanding against
the Project for either labor or materials, except certain items, if any, to be set forth in
an affidavit covering disputed claims or items in connection with a Stop Notice which
has been filed under the provisions of the laws of the State of California.
CONTRACT 4 r.\cip\projects\pw9 6\p w9 G- 1 ?\contract.wpd/ajp
16.
NOTICE TO CITY OF I ABOR DISPUTES. Whenever CONTRACTOR has knowledge that
any actual or potential labor dispute is delaying or threatens to delay the timely
performance of the Contract, CONTRACTOR shall immediately give notice thereof,
including all relevant information with respect thereto, to CITY.
17.
BOOKS AND RFCORDS. CONTRACTOR's books, records, and plans or such part thereof
as may be engaged in the performance of this Contract, shall at all reasonable times be
subject to inspection and audit by any authorized representative of the CITY.
18.
INSPECTION. The work shall be subject to inspection and testing by CITY and its
authorized representatives during manufacture and construction and all other times and
places, including without limitation, the plans of CONTRACTOR and any of its suppliers.
CONTRACTOR shall provide all reasonable facilities and assistance for the safety and
convenience of inspectors. All inspections and tests shall be performed in such manner
as to not unduly delay the work. The work shall be subject to final inspection and
acceptance notwithstanding any payments or other prior inspections. Such final
inspection shall be made within a reasonable time after completion of the work.
19.
DISCRIMINATION. CONTRACTOR represents that it has not, and agrees that it will not,
discriminate in its employment practices on the basis of race, creed, religion, national
origin, color, sex, age, or handicap.
20.
GOVERNING LAW. This Contract and any dispute arising hereunder shall be governed
by the law of the State of California.
21.
WRITTEN NOTICE. Any written notice required to be given in any part of the Contract
Documents shall be performed by depositing the same in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid,
directed to the address of the CONTRACTOR as set forth in the Contract Documents,
and to the CITY addressed as follows:
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
City of Temecula
Post Office Box 9033
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Contract to be executed on thedate
first above written.
DATED:
CONTRACTOR
DBX, Inc.
Jim Perry, President
42066 Avenida Alvarado, Suite C
Temecula, California 92590
By:
Jim Perry, President
CONTRACT
r:\cip\projects\pw96\pw96-17\contract.wpd/ajp
DATED: CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By:
Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
CONTRACT
r:\cip\projects\pw96\pw96-17\contract.wpd/ajp
o
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
~Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
June 10, 1997
SB 312 - Adding Division 26 to the Water Code Relating to Financing a
Flood Control and Prevention Program. Flood Prevention Bond Act of
1998.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 97-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA SUPPORTING SB 312 - ADDING DIVISION 26 TO THE
WATER CODE (COMMENCING WITH SECTION 79000).FLOOD
PREVENTION BOND ACT OF 1998
BACKGROUND:
Legislation to provide financing a flood control and prevention program known as the "Flood
Prevention Bond Act of 1998", has been introduced in Sacramento. This bill, if adopted, would
authorize, for the purpose of financing a flood control and prevention program, the issuance,
pursuant to the State General Obligation Bond Law, sale of bonds for that purpose.
The bill would require the Secretary of State to submit the bond act to the voters at the June
2, 1998, primary election. It would require a 2/3 vote for the issuance of bonds for that
purpose.
The bill provides for an Urban Stream Restoration Sub-account which could be of specific
benefit to this area in the form of grants for various phases of the Murrieta Creek project.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
Attachments:
Resolution No. 97-
R:~,GD1LPT~7~0610~S B312BN D.ACT rh
RESOLUTION NO. 97-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA SUPPORTING SB 312 - ADDING DIVISION
26 TO THE WATER CODE (COMMENCING WITH
SECTION 79000) FLOOD PREVENTION BOND ACT OF 1998
The City Council of the City of Temecula does resolve, determine and order as follows:
WHEREAS, SB 312 providing for financing Flood Control and Prevention Program and
Flood Prevention Bond Act is being considered by State Legislature; and,
WHEREAS, this legislation when adopted will pave the way for the people in California
to approve funding for the Flood Control and Prevention Programs; and,
WHEREAS, Portions of the City of Temecula are threatened annually by the streams
nmning through the City and have frequently flooded residential and commercial areas of the City
as a direct result of inadequate flood protection from Murrieta Creek and Temecula Creek; and,
WHEREAS, millions of dollars in property damage has been sustained in the several
recent incidents of flooding due to lack of adequate flood protection; and
WHEREAS, funding of these necessary improvements on these streams to provide the
health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of this community is beyond the means of the local
agencies;
NOW, TI-W~REFORE be it resolved that the City Council of the City of Temecula support
the passage of SB 312.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula
on the 10th day of June, 1997.
Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
l~6.GDRPT~.o~0610\SB312 BND.ACT rh
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the Resolution
No. 9% was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a
regular meeting thereof, held on the 10th day of June, 1997, by the following vote:
AYES: 0
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 0
ABSTAIN: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
RzXAGDRFI%97~0610~SB312BND~CT rh
TEMECULA COMMUN'!TY
SERVICES DISTRICT
o
ITEM 1
A regular meeting of the Temecula Community Services District was called to order at 8:15
PM at the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. President
Jeffrey E. Stone presiding.
5 DIRECTORS: Birdsall, Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, Stone
0 DIRECTORS: None
Also present were General Manager Ronald E. Bradley, General Counsel Peter Thorson and
Deputy City Clerk Susan Jones.
PUBLIC COMMENT:
None given.
CONSENT CALENDAR
It was moved by Director Linderoans, seconded by Director Birdsall, to approve Consent
Calendar Items 1 and 2.
1 Minutes
1.1 Approve the minutes of May 13, 1997.
2 Financial Statements for the Nine Months Ended 3/31/97 for Temecula Community
Services District
2.1 Review and file the Combining Balance Sheet as of March 31, 1997 and the
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance for the Nine
Months Ended March 31, 1997.
2.2 Approve an appropriation of $304,914 for an operating transfer from the Capital
Project Fund to the City's Development Impact Fee Fund.
The motion was unanimously carried.
DISTRICT BUSINESS
3 Appeal of 1996-97 TCSD Rates and Charges, Temecula Creek Inn Golf Course
City Attorney Peter Thorson presented the staff report.
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
HELD MAY 27, 1997
ROLL CALL:
PRESENT:
ABSENT:
Director Lindemans questioned exempting the portion of the property located in the
flood plain. Shawn Nelson, Director of Community Services, replied 22 acres in the
flood plain was determined not to be part of the developed golf course and was
therefore exempt and is consistent with previous exemptions.
Paul Reed, 325 Mesa Way, San Diego, representing the applicant, stated the TCSD
formula does not have a golf course classification. He stated a golf course does not
have the number of customers of a commercial one (1) acre property; and a golf course
utilizes a large number of acres similar to agriculture, but with low intensity usage. He
asked the Board to leave the fee at .5 EDU's per acre for the 1996/97 Fiscal Year, and
to find the golf course usage similar to a park or open space which cannot be
developed.
Director Linderoans stated the golf course is an asset to the community and wants to
leave the fee at .5 EDU's.
Director Birdsall stated a golf course is a commercial entity and income is generated
from people using it.
Director Roberts mentioned the proposed rate is consistent with the rate charged
Temeku Golf Course and sees no relationship between a park which does not charge a
user fee and a golf course which does charge a fee.
Director Ford stated the golf course offers open space and buffering and cannot be
developed as other commercial property.
Director Stone stated a golf course is a commercial venture and feels 2 EDU's are
appropriate for this usage.
It was moved by Director Birdsall, seconded by Director Roberts, to approve staff
recommendation.
3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 97-06
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT DENYING THE APPEAL BY REGENCY
PROPERTIES OF FISCAL YEAR 1996-97 RATES AND CHARGES LEVIED
AGAINST THE TEMECULA CREEK INN
City Attorney Thorson noted a change in Section 5 to state the Board considered the
appeal on May 27, 1997 rather than May 13, 1997.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 3 DIRECTORS:
NOES: 2 DIRECTORS:
ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS:
Birdsall, Roberts, Stone
Ford, Lindemans
None
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT
Mr. Nelson reported the Winchester Creek Park will be out to bid in July with construction to
begin in early fall of 1997.
GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT
None given.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS' REPORTS
None given.
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Director Birdsall, seconded by Director Roberts, to adjourn at 8:57 PM to a
meeting on June 10, 1997, 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive,
Temecula, California. The meeting was unanimously carried.
Jeffrey E. Stone, President
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk
District Secretary
3
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
ITEM 1
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
HELD MAY 27, 1997
A regular meting of the Temecula Redevelopment Agency was called to order at 8:57 PM at he
City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Chairperson Steven J.
Ford presiding.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: 5 AGENCY MEMBERS:
ABSENT: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS:
Also present were Executive Director Ronald E. Bradley, General Counsel Peter Thorson, and
Deputy City Clerk Susan W. Jones.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None given.
CONSENT CALENDAR
It was moved by Agency Member Lindemarts, seconded by Agency Member Birdsall to approve
Consent Calendar Items 1 and 2.
1 Minutes
1.1 Approve the minutes of May 13, 1997.
2 Financial Statements for the Nine Months Ended March 31, 1997
2.1 Receive and file the Combining Balance Sheet as of March 31, 1997 and the
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance for the Nine
Months Ended March 31, 1997.
2.2 Approve the recommended budget adjustments per "Schedule A".
The motion was unanimously carried.
Mayor Birdsall reconvened the City Council Meeting at 8:59 PM for a Joint Meeting of the City
Council and the Temecula Redevelopment Agency and reconvened the Redevelopment Agency
meeting at 9:00 PM.
Birdsall, Lindemans, Roberts, Stone, Ford
None
R:~Agenda~052797 I
JOINT MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
PUBLIC HEARINGS
3 Amscan Inc. Owner Participation Agreement
Assistant City Manager Mary Jane McLarney presented the staff report.
Mayor Birdsall opened the public hearing at 9:00 PM, and hearing no requests to speak,
closed the public hearing at 9:00 PM.
It was moved by Councilmember Stone, seconded by Councilmember Lindemans, to
approve staff recommendation.
3.1 That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 97-52
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF 'rEMECULA APPROVING
AN OWNER PARTICIPATING AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AND AMSCAN INC., A NEW YORK CORPORATION
3.2 That the Redevelopment Agency adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 97-03
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING AN OWNER PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND AMSCAN INC., A
NEW YORK CORPORATION
The motion carried unanimously.
Mayor Birdsall recessed the City Council Meeting at 9:03 PM.
AGENCY BUSINESS
4 Facade Improvement Program Amendment
Agency Member .Stone stepped down due to a conflict of interest.
Senior Planner Jones Meyer presented the staff report.
Agency Member Birdsall clarified this work does not fall under the prevailing wage
structure.
R:\Agenda\052797 2
It was moved by Agency Member Lindemans, seconded by Agency Member Birdsall, to
approve staff recommendation.
4.1 Amend the Facade Improvement and Non-conforming Sign Removal Program.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 4 AGENCY MEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Roberts, Ford
NOES: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None
ABSTAIN: 1 AGENCY MEMBERS: Stone
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
Executive Director Bradley reported he, along with Agency Members Roberts and Stone, attended
the ICSC Conference in Las Vegas, where the main attraction of Forest City's booth was the
proposed Temecula Mall. He announced grading for the mall should begin by the end of June
1997.
AGENCY MEMBER'S REPORTS
None given.
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Agency Member Stone, seconded by Agency Member Lindemans to adjourn at
9:06 PM to the a meeting on June 10, 1997, 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business
Park Drive, Temecula, California. The motion was unanimously carried.
ATTEST:
Steven J. Ford, Chairperson
June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk
R:\Agencla\052797 3
ITEM 2
APPROVal
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE DIRE~TO2--~
CITY MANAGER)~"~ .?.~/~.
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE: ~
SUBJECT:
Executive Director/Redevelopment Agency Members
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
June 10, 1997
Contract Amendment No. 3, Project No. PW95-07, Professional Services with
Trans-Pacific Consultants, Inc. for the Design of Phase I and Phase II of the
Western Bypass Corridor, Purchase Order 17136
PREPARED BY:
Ronald J. Parks, Principal Engineer - Land Development
John Pourkazemi, Associate Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Redevelopment Agency approve Contract Amendment No. 3, and authorize the
Chairperson to execute the Amendment between the City and Trans-Pacific Consultants, Inc.
in the amount of $60,935.00 bringing the total contract amount to $552,203.60. The
Agreement will be subject to the approval of the Executive Director and the General Counsel
as to final form.
BACKGROUND:
The Agreement for Professional Services approved by the Redevelopment Agency on March 28,
1995, funded $365,843.60 for design of Phase I of the Western Bypass Corridor, the section
from Front Street to Vincent Moraga Drive and the Vincent Moraga Drive extension. As
authorized, Amendment No. 1 was approved on October 31, 1995, for additional work in the
amount of $86,085.00 for design of a portion of Phase II of the Western Bypass Corridor, the
section from Vincent Moraga Drive to Rancho California Road including the alignment for the
Western Bypass Corridor bridge over crossing Rancho California Road to accommodate a grade
separated intersection configuration. Thus the contract amount was adjusted to $451,928.60
and with a 10% contingency in the amount of $45,192.86 the total authorized amount was
$497,121.46.
Amendment No. 2 in the amount of $37,340.00 was approved on July 9, 1996, for additional
preliminary geotechnical investigation, additional aerial topographic maps and detail
investigation for the Western Bypass Corridor crossing at Rancho California Road,
environmental documentation, provision of street light plans and the design engineer's
attendance at meetings with Mr. Buffman's representatives.
1 R:~AG DR.PT~97V)610\WBPW95-4).AD3
In our joint participation with Riverside County, the Front Street and State Route 79
South/Western Bypass Corridor intersection improvements will be included with the Interstate
15/State Route 79 South interchange improvements. This work is scheduled to begin as soon
as the property acquisition for construction of the intersection has been completed and plans
have been finalized.
The interchange improvement plans were complete and approved by Caltrans. However, when
the City Council approved acquisition of only 12,O00 square feet the plans had to be modified
and the Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD) lift station had to be relocated. The acquired
limited area required preparation of revised legal descriptions and plats for the necessary
acquisition documents and modifications to the improvement plans for relocation of the lift
station. A purchase order in the amount of $2,000.00 between the City and Trans-Pacific
Consultants was approved on January 2, 1997, for preparation of legal descriptions and plats
in order to proceed with the property acquisition.
Amendment No. 3 in the amount of $60,935.00 is for the following items:
To prepare additional right-of-way documents identifying the limits of construction and
slopes in the amount of $5,000.00,
To revise the improvement plans to include provisions for the utilities in the amount of
$19,325.00,
To revise the bridge plans to incorporate a retaining wall at the abutment in the amount
of 9,800.00,
To make the necessary revisions to the Interstate 15/State Route 79 South interchange
bid plans as they relate to the modifications of the EMWD lift station and driveway in
the amount of 9,100.00, and
To make the necessary revisions to the Interstate 15/State Route 79 South interchange
bid plans for reducing acquisition to 12,000 square feet in the amount of $17,710.00.
The contract amount will be $552,203.60 with approval of Amendment No. 3. The breakdown
is as follows:
Initial Contract
Amendment No. 1
Amendment No. 2
Amendment No. 3
TOTAL
$365,843.6O
86,085.00
37,340.00
2,000.00
60.935.00
$552,2O3.6O
preparation of legal description and plat for the 12,000
square feet acquisition area
Western Bypass Corridor is included in the current Capital Improvement Program,
2 R :~.G DRFT,,~0~ 10\W~ FW95_O. AD3
FISCAL IMPACT:
$800,130.00 is available in Capital Improvement Program Account No. 210-165-612-5802 for
this Professional Services contract of $491,268.60 and Amendment No. 3 in the amount of
$60,935.00 for a total cost of $552,203.60. Funds are available in the Fiscal Year 1996-1997
budget.
The total authorized amount was $497,121.46. Approval of this Amendment No. 3 will
increase the original authorized amount by $55,082.14.
ATTACHMENTS:
Exhibit "A" - Amendment No. 3 - Trans-Pacific Consultants - Project No. PW95-07
3 R:~AGDRPT~97~0610\W~PW9~0.AD3
Exhibit "A"
R: ~.AG DRFF\F7V~ I 0\VVB !~/95-.0. AD3
Exhibit "A"
AMENDMENT NO. 3
TRANS-PACIFIC CONSULTANTS, INC.
PURCHASE ORDER NO. 17136
The agreement dated July 15, 1995, between the City of Temecula and Trans-Pacific
Consultants, Inc. (TPC) (herein referred to as "Agreement") is hereby amended as follows:
RE: Design of Phase I and Phase II of the Western Bypass Corridor
Section 1
The Scope of Work is hereby amended to include the following in a not to exceed contract
amount of $43,225.00:
To prepare additional right-of-way documents identifying the limits of construction and
slopes in the amount of $5,000.00,
To revise the improvement plans to include provisions for the utilities in the amount of
$19,325.00,
To revise the bridge plans to incorporate a retaining wall at the abutment in the amount
of 9,800.00,
To make the necessary revisions to the Interstate 15/State Route 79 South interchange
bid plans as they relate to the modifications of the EMWD lift station and driveway in
the amount of 9,100.00, and
To make the necessary revisions to the Interstate 15/State Route 79 South interchange
bid plans for reducing acquisition to 12,000 square feet in the amount of $1 7,710.00.
The Scope of Services are identified in Attachment No. 1 of this Exhibit "A".
Section 2
Compensation shall be for all services described in this Amendment.
The total cost of this element of the project is summarized below:
Ao
B.
C.
d.
Eo
Approved Contract
Amendment No. 1
Amendment No. 2
Preparation of legal description and plat for the
12,000 square feet acquisition area
Amendment No. 3
TOTAL
$365,843.6O
86,085.00
37,340.00
2,000.00
60,935.00
$552,203.60
I R :~.GDRPI~97~0610\WB PW95-0.AD3
Section 3
All other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain the same.
The parties hereto have executed this Amendment No. 3 to the Agreement of the above written
date.
CONSULTANT CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Rich Soltysiak, Director of Engineering
By:
Steven J. Ford, Chairman
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
2 R:',AG DR PT\97~O~ 10\WI~I~V9.~0.AD3
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
R:~AGDR. Ir~9'Tl~fI 0\'W'BPWg.~-.0. AD3
Au,zust 30. 1996
Work Order .No. Z77-035.12
Amendment ,.No.
City of Temecula
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula. CA 92589-9033
Anention: Mr. John Pourkazemi
Subject:
Western Bypass Corridor Phase I and Phase II
Additional Utility. Easement
Dear Mr. Pourkazemi:
Enclosed are two original, executed copies of our Aa¥12ENDlVI~NT FOR EXTR.< AND
ADDITION:&L WORK for the Western Bypass Comdor Phase I and Phase II Additional Utitirv
Easement.
Please sign and date both ongmals and initial each page of the Amendment. Keep one ongmal for
your files and return one to us in the enclosed self-addressed, stamped envelope provided for your
convemence.
Sincerely,
TRANS-PACIJ'IC CONSLrLTANTS, INC.
CO.'
Bob Inopea, TPC
Leland Marcial, TPC
File: 477-035.12
Chron
C'IT;' OF- T£.~ 1£CC'£.4
.4.! I£.\:D,W£Y/T .',"0. 2
[I:O .t,'2-035 /2
EXHIB[T "A"
SCOPE OF AMEN'DED SERVICES
Revise plats and legal descriptions to include a 6' public utility. easement adjacent
to the noaheasterly right of way line for Western Bypass Corndot between Front
Street and Rancho California Road.
Revise street improvement plans to show 6' =m-aded utility easement and
recalculate earthwork quantities rbr Phase I and Phase r.I.
Revise storm drain for Phase II.
Design anct
Proleer Team Drafting
Prolect Engineer 1 78 I
~.ssocmre CADD Designer 115 J
Assocmte Surveyor I J
Project Manager }
Total Fees I t
Re:mbursat>les l bluelines) I I
Total Amendment ~o. 3 } [
Legals
3O
Total
Hour~
78
115
30
2'4
Rate/Hr I Total Cost
580 } S6.240.00
~;65 t 57,475.00
g751 52.250.00
590t ~;2.160.00
I $18.125.00
t S1200 09
I S]9,225.0o
[II.
These services shall be billed on a hme and material basis not to exceed 518.125.00.
REiMBURSABLFS
This Amendment includes a reproduction budget in the amount of 51,200.00.
Ptc.~c (nitia~
"_:'e ng ....LYE W B P 03 h'a,;v- P.tc..q.;c' (.'onv:titt:tn;,~ inc.
MC. DAN! EL ENGINEERtNG
October 8, 1996
Mr. Greg Aguilar
Trans-Pacific Consultants
_ J447 Enterprise Circle West
Temecula, CA 92590
Subject:
Addendum for the Western Bypass Corridor Bridge over Nlurrieta Creek in the
City o£Temecula - Retaining Walls at Abutment 1
Dear Greg:
As previously discussed in our meeting on June 27, 1996 with you and Steve Cresswell of the City of
Temeculm we indicatea mat we wui provine a proposal for me aes~gn aria (letailing of retaining walls that
are required at the west abutment (abutment I).
Due to conflicts with the Metropolitan Water District's 97" and 99" pipelines. the abutment location was
revised, and the abutment type was revised from a short seat type, to a tall cantilevered type abutment.
This required the addition of retaining walls to support the fill behind the abutment.
Our original scope of work for the bridge design did not include design and detailing for these retaining
walls. Based upon ~e latest information provided by Bob ionopea. we estimate that the retaining walls
will have an approximate len~h of 110' and will range in heig_ht from 8' to 26'. We anticipate that
Caltrans Standard Type 1, reinforced concrete retaining walls. founded on spread footings will be used.
We propose to provide our engineering services which include design. derailing, quantity and quantity.
check calculations, Engineefts estimate. and special provisions for the retaining walls for a fixed fee of
$9,$00. If this proposal is satisfactory, you may indicate your acceptance by signing in the space provided
and returning a copy to our office. We have provided a space for the City. of Temecula to initialize.
Very truly yours,
Ja~n~s~P E '~' ~) ~
McDaniel Engineering Company, Inc.
ACCEPTANCE
Trans-Pacific Consultants'
By:
Name:
Title:
Date:
McDaniel Engineering Company, Inc.
By: ,:f~--~< ~ ~,~~
Name: W. Mark Ashley
Title: ~- ~ ~ -',~ --" ~
Date: October 8. 1996
City of Temecula
Initials:
Title:
Date:
5030 Camino De La Siesta, Suite 204 · San Diego, California 92108 · (619) 5.92-1920 Fax (619) 692-0634
E-Mail: Compuserve, 102521.3714.corn
LFTTFR OF TRANSMITTAL
'l'cmccula, C.'~ ')25')0 t;?,4
Tel. (')[.1) .',% - ',)(,,,
Trans-lPacific
.lanuarv 20, 1997
City Of Temecula
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92500
We are transmitting via: Personal Delivery
Attention:
SUBJECT.
John Pourkazemi, Associate Engineer
Western Bypass Comdor/l-I 5/SR79 Interchange
RECEIVED
CiTY OF TEMECULA
ENGINEERING DEPA RTMEN 1'
Dear Mr. Jolm:
With this letter. we are transmitting the following as requested;
l. ) One preliminary cost estimate dated January 20. 1997 tbr the revisions needed
tbr I-15/SR79 South Interchange bid plans. This revisions is m response to Citv's request
revise Lift Station Relocation plans to accomodate parking space for Texaco.
If you have an.,,' questions or need timher inibrmation. please don't hesitate to call me at
ext. 347.
Sincereix',
TR.ANS-PACIFIC CONSULTANTS, iNC.
BoB t~opea
Project Engineer
Greg AgmlaL TI'C
leland M.tcial .TPC
Fn.412-030;23031 05
cl~run
Trans -l~acific
TRANSMITTAL
December 20, 1996
City of Ternecula
Public Works Depm tment
43174 Business Park Drive
Temeoda. CA 92590
We are transmitting via: Personal Delivery
Attention: Mr. John Pourkazemi, Associate Engineer
Subject:
Western Bypass Corridor/l-15/SR79 South Interchange
Dear John:
·
With this letter, we are transmitting the foilowing as requested:
1) One pr '~ cost estimate dated December 20, 1996 for the revisions needed for
both the I-15/SR 79 South Interchange bid plans and the Westera Bypass Comdor - Phase I plans in
response to the C, ity Council's decision on the fight ofway issue.
If you should have any questions or need more information, please do not hesitate to contact me at ext.
265. i
Sincerely,
TRAN&?A~C CONSULTANTS, INC.
Bob lao~s, TI~
Joe Perez, Ti~
Files: 412-030, 23031.05
Chron
PRELIMINARY
TRANS-PACIFIC CONSULTANTS, INC.
20-Dec-g6
I. 1-15/SR 79 SOUTH INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENT PLANS
ACTIVITY I HRS
A. REVISE IMPROVEMENT PLANS
1. REVISE LAYOUT PLAN NO. 1
2. REVISE GRADING PLAN SHTS. NO, G-1 AND G-2
3. REVISE STAGE CONSTRUCTION PLAN SC-1. SC-7,
SC9, ACol I AND SC-13
REVISE PAVEMENT DELINEATION PLAN PD-1 , PD1A
REVISE SIGNING PLAN S-1 AND S-1A
REVISE EROSION CONTROL PLAN EC-2
7. REVISE RECLAIMED WATER SHT, 3
8. REVISE SEWER LIFT STATION SHT. 1
SUBTOTAL FOR IMPROVEMENT PLAN REVISIONS
12
16
6
8
8
64
COSTIHR
TOTAL COST
$ 85.00$ 510.00
$ 85.00$ 1,020.00
B. UPDATE QUANTITY AND ENGINEER'S COST ESTIMATES
$ 85.00$ 1.360.00
$ 85.00$ 340.00
$ 85.00$ 340.00
$ 85.00 $ 510.00
$ 85.00 $ 680.00
$ 85.00$ 680.00
$ 5.440.00
1. REVISE COST ESTIMATE
C. REVISE LEGALS AND PLATS
1. REVISE LEGALS AND PLATS
D. AGENCY COORDINATION
1. COORDINATE REVISIONS WITH CALTRANS, RCTD, COT. EMWD,
RCWD AND OTHER AFFECTED UTILITY COMPANIES
12
85.00 $ 1,020.00
10 $ 85.00 $ 850.00
40
i
95.00 I $ 3,800.00
SUBTOTAL FOR 1-1515R795 INTERCHANGE
126 $ 11,110.00
'
II. WESTERN BYPASS CORRIDOR - PHASE I IMPROVEMENT PLANS
1. REVISE PLAN AND PROFILE
2. REVISE STORM DRAIN PLANS
3. REVISE COST ESTIMATE
4. REVISE RECLAIMED WATER PLAN
5. COORDINATE REVISIONS WITH COT, RCTD AND RCWD AND
AFFECTED UTILITY COMPANIES
16 $ 85.00
16 $ 85.00
4 $ 85.00
8 $ 85.0015
16 J $ 85.00
1,360.00
1,360.00
340.00
680.00
1,360.00
SUBTOTAL FOR WESTERN BY-PASS CORRIDOR - PHASE i
III. REIMBURSABLES
GRAND TOTAL
36
$ 5,100.00
S 1,500.00
I $ 17,710.00
Page 1
ITEM. ~3
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROV ,, '
CITY ATTORNEY ~V.~ -~
FINANCE OFFICER ' IPCl,
CITY MANAGER '~/~
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
Redevelopment Agency Members/Executive Director
Mary Jane McLarney, Assistant City Manager
June 10, 1997
Award of a Professional Services Contract to Westcott and McGregor and
Associates for Property Management of the Sherwood and Pujol Apartments
Prepared By: John R. Meyer
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Agency Board:
Award a Professional Services Contract in the amount of $1,600 per month to
W.estcott, McGregor and Associates for property management, operation and
maintenance of the Sherwood and Pujol Apartments.
2. Authorize RDA Chairperson to Execute Contract.
BACKGROUND
On October 8, 1996 the Redevelopment Agency authorized the purchase of the Sherwood and
Pujol Apartments located along the west side of Pujol Street in Old Town. There is a total of
38 units in the two apartments. In order to maintain consistency in the management of the
property, staff is recommending the Agency retain the services of Westcott and McGregor who
has managed the property for the FDIC for the last two years. This firm has done an fine job
as can be attested to by the properties' appearance and reduction in police calls.
The contract is on a month to month basis until the property is rehabilitated as part of the
future RDA affordable housing project. This will take a minimum of 9-12 months. The
$1,600 a month covers the management of all 38 units and is the same rate paid by the FDIC.
FISCAL IMPACT
The average gross operating expenses are projected to be $9,005 per month (Exhibit C of the
Agreement). In addition, there are several non-recurring expenses that may arise during the
length of this agreement. Therefore $48,980 has been included for contingencies such as unit
upgrades and renovations, legal fees and miscellaneous fees. A total of $134,000 has been
proposed in the FY 97-98 RDA Low-Mod Budget (Account 165-199-201-5480 and 165-199-
202-5480).
R:\HOUSING\WESTCT97.STF 613197 cad 1
Actual costs will be offset by the revenues collected from the rent. The gross revenues are
currently $17,945 per month or $215,340 through the end of the agreement.
Attachments:
1. Agreement - Page 4
R: \HOUSING\WESTCT97.STF 6/2/97 c~d 2
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
AGREEMENT
R:\HOUSING\WESTCTVT,STF 6/2/97 c~d 3
PROPERTY MANAGEMF~ SERVICES AGREF_aME~
THIS AGREEMF2qT is made as of by and between the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Temecula, a public body, corporate and politic ("Agency") and Westcott,
McGregor & Associates, Inc., a California corporation ("Manager").
RECITALS
A. Agency desires to utilize the services of Manager as an independent contractor to
provide property management services to Agency as set forth in Exhibit B.
B. Manager represents that it is fully qualified to perform such property management
services by virtue of its experience and the training, education and expertise of its principals and
employees.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of performance by the parties of the covenants and
conditions herein contained, the parties hereto agree as follows:
1. Manager's Services.
Manager shall act as the property manager for the Agency owned properties located
at 28497-28485 Pujol Street, and 28559 Pujol Street (collectively, the "Agency Properties"), in
the City of Temecula, California. The nature and scope of the specific services to be performed
by Manager are as described in Exhibit B.
2. Term of Agreement. This Contract shall take effect and shall
terminate , unless sooner terminated as provided herein.
3. Compensation.
a. The Agency agrees to pay Manager monthly. The amount shall not exceed
Sixteen Hundred Dollars ($1,600.00) each month for the total term of this Agreement unless
additional payment is approved by the Agency as provided in this Agreement. For property
management services, the sum shall be $1,600.00 per month pro-rated for any partial month for
which services are provided. Manager is authorized to deduct such amount each month as the first
charge upon the gross monthly income received. Gross monthly income includes, without
limitation, rents of all forms, tax and insurance reimbursements and other miscellaneous charges.
In no event shall security deposits, the proceeds from insurance claims, condemnation or the sale
of assets be classified as a portion of "gross income".
b. For services not customarily a part of the usual duties required of Manager
under this Agreement, Manager shall receive additional compensation in an amount to be mutually
agreed upon, by both parties on a case by case basis. Any such extraordinary services requires
the prior written authorization of the Agency.
R:\HOUSING\WESTCT97.STF 6/2/97 c~ 4
4. General Terms and Conditions. The General Terms and Conditions set forth in
Exhibit A are incorporated as part of this Agreement. In the event of any inconsistency between
the General Terms and Conditions and any other exhibit to this Agreement, the General Terms
and Conditions shall control unless it is clear from the context that both parties intend the
provisions of the other exhibit to control. The provisions of Manager's proposal, if any, shall
not control over the General Terms and Conditions.
5. Addresses.
Agency:
Ronald E. Bradley, Executive Director
Atto: Genie Roberts, Director of Finance
City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency
43200 Business Park Drive
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
Manager:
Dora Westcott
Westcott, McGregor & Associates Inc.
2141 Palomar Airport Road, #110
Carlsbad, CA 92009
6. Exhibits. All three (3) exhibits referred to in this Agreement are incorporated
herein by this reference.
IN WITNESS WI-IEREI)F, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed
the day and year first above written.
REDEVELOPIVIENT AGENCY OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA
Attest:
By
Redevelopment Agency Chairperson
June S. Greek, Agency Secretary
R:\HOUSING\WESTCT97.STF 6/'2/97 cad 5
Approved As to Form:
Peter M. Thorson, Agency Counsel
Manager
Dora Westcott, President
R:\HOUSING\WESTCT9~.STF 6/2/97 end 6
EXHIBIT "A"
GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS
1. Status as Independent Contractor.
A. Manager is, and shall at all times remain as to Agency, a wholly independent
contractor. Manager shall have no power to incur any debt, obligation, or liability on behalf of
Agency or otherwise act on behalf of Agency as an agent. Neither Agency nor any of its agents
shall have control over the conduct of Manager or any of Manager's employees, except as set
forth in this Agreement. Manager shall not, at any time, or in any manner, represent that it or
any of its agents or employees are in any manner agents or employees of Agency.
B. Manager agrees to pay all required taxes on amounts paid to Manager under this
Agreement, and to indemnify and hold Agency harmless from any and all taxes, assessments,
penalties, and interest asserted against Agency by reason of the independent contractor relationship
created by this Agreement. In the event that Agency is audited by any Federal or State agency
regarding the independent contractor status of Manager and the audit in any way fails to sustain
the validity of a wholly independent contractor relationship between Agency and Manager, then
Manager agrees to reimburse Agency for all costs, including accounting and attorney's fees,
arising out of such audit and any appeals relating thereto.
C. Manager shall fully comply with the workers' compensation law regarding Manager
and Manager's employees. Manager further agrees to indemnify and hold Agency harmless from
any failure of Manager to comply with applicable worker's compensation laws. Agency shall have
the right to offset against the amount of any fees due to Manager under this Agreement any
amount due to Agency from Manager as a result of Manager's failure to promptly pay to Agency
any reimbursement or indemnification arising under this Section 1.
2. Standard of Performance. Manager shall perform all work to the highest professional
standards and in a manner reasonably satisfactory to the Agency Executive Director or the Agency
Executive Director's designee.
3. Indemnification. Manager is skilled in the professional calling necessary to perform the
services and duties agreed to be performed under this Agreement, and Agency is relying upon the
skill and knowledge of Manager to perform those services and duties. To the fullest extent
permitted by law, Manager hereby agrees, at its sole cost and expense, to defend, protect,
indemnify, and hold harmless the Agency, the City of Temecula, and their elected officials,
officers, attorneys, agents, employees, volunteers, successors, and assigns (collectively
"Indemnitees") from and against any and all damages, costs, expenses, liabilities, claims,
demands, causes of action, proceedings, expenses, judgments, penalties, liens, and losses of any
nature whatsoever, including fees of accountants, attorneys, or other professionals and all costs
associated therewith, arising or claimed to arise, directly or indirectly, out of, in connection with,
resulting from, or related to any act, failure to act, error, or omission of Manager or any of its
officers, agents, servants, employees, subcontractors, materialmen, suppliers or their officers,
agents, servants or employees, arising or claimed to arise, directly or indirectly, out of, in
R:\HOUSING\WESTCT97.STF 6/2/97 cad 7
connection with, resulting from, or related to this Agreement or the performance or failure to
perform any term, provision, covenant, or condition of the Agreement, including this indemnity
provision. This indemnity provision is effective regardless of any prior, concurrent, or subsequent
active or passive negligence by Indemnitees and shall operate to fully indemnify Indemnitees
against any such negligence. This indemnity provision shall survive the termination of the
Agreement and is in addition to any other rights or remedies which Indemnitees may have under
the law. Payment is not required as a condition precedent to an Indemnitee's right to recover
under this indemnity provision, and an entry of judgment against an Indemnitee shall be
conclusive in favor of the Indemnitee's right to recover under this indemnity provision. Manager
shall pay Indemnitees for any attorneys fees and costs incurred in enforcing this indemnification
provision. Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing in this instrument shall be construed to
encompass (a) Indemnitees' sole negligence or willful misconduct to the limited extent that the
underlying Agreement is subject to Civil Code § 2782(a) or (b) the contracting public agency's
active negligence to the limited extent that the underlying Agreement is subject to Civil Code
§ 2782C0). This indemnity is effective without reference to the existence or applicability of any
insurance coverages which may have been required under the Agreement or any additional insured
endorsements which may extend to Indemnitees.
Manager, on behalf of itself and all parties claiming under or through it, hereby
waives all rights of subrogation and contribution against the Indemnitees, while acting within the
scope of their duties, from all claims, losses and liabilities arising out of or incident to activities
or operations performed by or on behalf of the Manager regardless of any prior, concurrent, or
subsequent active or passive negligence by the Indemnitees.
In the event there is more than one (1) person or entity named in the Agreement
as a Manager, then all obligations, liabilities, covenants and conditions under this Section 3 shall
be joint and several.
4. Insurance. Manager shall at all times during the term of this Agreement carry, maintain,
and keep in full force and effect, with an insurance company admitted to do business in California
and approved by the Agency (1) a policy or policies of broad-form comprehensive general liability
insurance with minimum limits of $1,000,000.00 combined single limit coverage against any
injury, death, loss or damage as a result of wrongful or negligent acts by Manager, its officers,
employees, agents, and independent contractors in performance of services under this Agreement;
and (2) worker's compensation insurance in the amount required by law. Agency, its officers,
employees, attorneys, and volunteers shall be named as additional insureds on the policy(ies) as
to comprehensive general liability, property damage, and workefts compensation coverages.
(1) All insurance policies shall provide that the insurance coverage shall not be non-
renewed, canceled, reduced, or otherwise modified (except through the addition of additional
insureds to the policy) by the insurance carrier without the insurance carrier giving Agency thirty
(30) day's prior written notice thereof. Manager agrees that it will not cancel, reduce or otherwise
modify the insurance coverage.
(2) Manager agrees that if it does not keep the insurance in full force and effect, and such
R:\HOUSING\WESTCT9'7.STF 6/2/9'7 e~d 8
insurance is available at a reasonable cost, Agency may take out the necessary insurance and pay
the premium thereon, and the repayment thereof shall be deemed an obligation of Manager and
the cost of such insurance may be deducted, at the option of Agency, from payments due
Manager.
(3) Manager shall submit to Agency (i) insurance certificates indicating compliance with
the worker's compensation insurance requirements above, and (2) insurance policy endorsements
indicating compliance with all other minimum insurance requirements above, not less that one (1)
day prior to beginning of performance under this Agreement. Endorsements shall be executed on
Agency's appropriate standard forms entitled "Additional Insured Endorsement".
5. Confidentiality. Manager in the course of its duties may have access to confidential data
of Agency, private individuals, or employees of the Agency. Manager covenants that all data,
documents, discussion, or other information developed or received by Manager or provided for
performance of this Agreement are deemed confidential and shall not be disclosed by Manager
without written authorization by Agency. Agency shall grant such authorization if disclosure is
required by law. All Agency data shall be returned to Agency upon the termination of this
Agreement. Manager's covenant under this section shall survive the termination of this
Agreement.
6. Managership of Materials. All materials, books and records, provided by Manager in
the performance of this Agreement shall be and remain the property of Agency without restriction
or limitation upon its use or dissemination by Agency.
7. Conflict of Interest. Manager covenants that it presently has no interest and shall not
acquire any interest, director or indirect, which may be affected by the services to be performed
by Manager under this Agreement, or which would conflict in any manner with the performance
of its services hereunder. Manager further covenants that, in performance of this Agreement, no
person having any such interest shall be employed by it. Furthermore, Manager shall avoid the
appearance of having any interest which would conflict in any manner with the performance of
its services pursuant to this Agreement.
8. Termination. Agency may terminate this Agreement with or without cause upon thirty
(30) days' written notice to Manager. The effective date of termination shall be upon the date
specified in the notice of termination, or, in the event no date is specified, upon the thirtieth (30th)
day following delivery of the notice. In the event of such termination, Agency agrees to pay
Manager for services satisfactorily rendered prior to the effective date of termination and assume
responsibility for expenses incurred in compliance with the contract during the active contract
period. Immediately upon receiving written notice of termination, Manager shall discontinue
performing services.
9. Personnel. Manager represents that it has, or will secure at its own expense, all personnel
required to perform the services under this Agreement. All of the services required under this
Agreement will be performed by Manager or under it supervision, and all personnel engaged in
the work shall be qualified to perform such services. Manager reserves the right to determine the
R:\HOUSING\WESTCT97.STF 6/2/97 cad 9
assignment of its own employees to the performance of Manager's services under this Agreement,
but Agency reserves the right, for good cause, to require Manager to exclude any employee from
performing services on the Agency Properties.
10. Financial Condition. Prior to entering into this Agreement, Manager has submitted
documentation acceptable to the Agency Executive Director, establishing that it is financially
solvent, such that it can reasonably be expected to perform the services required by this
Agreement. Within thirty (30) days of the furst anniversary of the effective date of this
Agreement, and each year thereafter throughout the term of this Agreement, Manager shall submit
such financial information as may be appropriate to establish to the satisfaction of the Agency
Executive Director that Manager is in at least as sound a financial position as was the case prior
to entering into this Agreement. Financial information submitted to the Agency Executive
Director shall be returned to Manager after review and shall not be retained by Agency.
11. Non-Discrimination and Equal Employment Opportunity.
A. Manager shall not discriminate as to race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status,
national origin, ancestry, age, physical or mental handicap, medical condition, or sexual
orientation, in the performance of its services and duties pursuant to this Agreement, and will
comply with all rules and regulations of Agency relating thereto. Such nondiscrimination shall
include but not be limited to the following: employment, upgrading, demotion, transfers,
recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoff or termination; rates of pay or other forms of
compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship.
B. Manager will, in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on
behalf of Manager state either that it is an equal opportunity employer or that all qualified
applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, color, creed,
religion, sex, marital status, national origin, ancestry, age, physical or mental handicap, medical
condition, or sexual orientation.
C. Manager will cause the foregoing provisions to be inserted in all subcontracts for any
work covered by this Agreement except contracts or subcontracts for standard commercial supplies
or raw materials.
12. Assignment. Manager shall not assign or transfer any interest in this Agreement nor the
performance of any of Manager's obligations hereunder, without the prior written consent of
Agency, and any attempt by Manager to so assign this Agreement or any rights, duties, or
obligations arising hereunder shall be void and of no effect.
13. Performance Evaluation. For any contract in effect for twelve months or longer, a
written annual administrative performance evaluation shall be required within ninety (90) days of
the first anniversary of the effective date of this Agreement, and each year thereafter throughout
the term of this Agreement. The work product required by this Agreement shall be utilized as the
basis for review, and any comments or complaints received by Agency during the review period,
either orally or in writing, shall be considered. Agency shall meet with Manager prior to
R:\HOUSING\WESTC'r97.STF 6/2/97 cad 10
preparing the written report. If any noncompliance with the Agreement is found, Agency may
direct Manager to correct the inadequacies, or, in the alternative, may terminate this Agreement
as provided herein.
14. Compliance with Laws. Manager shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances,
codes and regulations of the federal, state, and local governments.
15. Non-Waiver of Terms, Rights and Remedies. Waiver by either party of any one or
more of the conditions of performance under this Agreement shall not be a waiver of any other
condition of performance under this Agreement. In no event shall the making by Agency of any
payment to Manager constitute or be construed as a waiver by Agency of any breach of covenant,
or any default which may then exist on the part of Manager, and the making of any such payment
by Agency shall in no way impair or prejudice any right or remedy available to Agency with
regard to such breach or default.
16. Attorney's Fees. In the event that either party to this Agreement shall commence any
legal or equitable action or proceeding to enforce or interpret the provisions of this Agreement,
the prevailing party in such action or proceeding shall be entitled to recover its costs of suit,
including reasonable attorney's fees and costs, including costs of expert witnesses and consultants.
17. Notices. Any notices, bills, invoices, or reports required by this Agreement shall be
deemed received on (a) the day of delivery if delivered by hand during Manager's or Agency's
regular business hours or by facsimile before or during Manager's or Agency's regular business
hours; or Co) on the third business day following deposit in the United States mail, postage
prepaid, to the addresses heretofore set forth in the Agreement, or to such other addresses as the
parties may, from time to time, designate in writing pursuant to the provisions of this section.
18. Governing Law. This Contract shall be interpreted, construed and enforced in accordance
with the laws of the State of California.
19. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of
which shall be deemed to be the original, and all of which together shall constitute one and the
same instrument.
20. Entire Agreement. This Agreement, and any other documents incorporated herein by
specific reference, represent the entire and integrated agreement between Manager and Agency.
This Agreement supersedes all prior oral or written negotiations, representations or agreements.
This Agreement may not be amended, nor any provision or breach hereof waived, except in a
writing signed by the parties which expressly refers to this Agreement. Amendments on behalf
of the Agency will only be valid if signed by the Agency Executive Director or the Agency
Chairperson and attested by the Agency Secretary.
R: \HOUSI~G\WESTCT97.STF 612/97 cad 1 1
~IT "B"
SCOPE OF WORK
Manager shall provide all services necessary to manage the Agency Properties in a prudent
and businesslike manner, consistent with the highest standards for the management of rental
housing.
A. AGENCY PROPERTIES
SHERWOOD APARTMENTS
28497-28485 Pujol Street
Temecula, California 92590
PUJOL APARTMENTS
28559 Pujo! Street
Temecula, California 92590
go
GENERAL SERVICES
Manager will train resident managers, and ensure that competent, properly trained
personnel are available for Agency Properties to handle any contingency.
2. Will have personnel available to make "emergency" and non-emergency"
distinctions to situations and take appropriate action 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
o
Manager shall advertise the availability of units on the Agency Properties in a
manner agreed upon by Manager and Agency.
Manager will work diligently to procure tenants per the occupancy standards and
at rental rates as approved in writing by Agency. Manager will not knowingly
permit any of the dwelling units on the Agency Properties to be used on a transient
basis and will not rent any such dwelling units for a period of less than thirty (30)
consecutive days nor allow any of the dwelling units on the Agency Properties to
be leased or rented for use as a hotel, motel, dormitory, fraternity house, sorority
house, rooming house, nursing home, or rest home.
Manager is authorized to negotiate rental agreements on behalf of Agency for terms
not to exceed month to month.
The form of rental agreement used by Manager shall be subject to review and
approval by the Agency Executive Director or designee. The Manager shall
include provisions in such rental agreements which authorize the Manager to
immediately terminate the tenancy of any Lower Income Household occupying an
dwelling unit on the Agency Properties where one or more of such Lower Income
Households have misrepresented any fact material to the qualification of such
individual or family as a Lower Income Household and/or for qualification for
occupancy of a Lower Income Unit on the Agency Properties. Each such rental
agreement for a dwelling unit on the Agency Properties shall also provide that the
R:\HOU$ING\WF_.STCT97.$TF 6/2/97 cad ] 2
tenants of such unit shall be subject to annual certification or recertification of
income. Each such rental agreement shall also provide that the Manager will not
discriminate on the base of race, creed, color, sex, national origin, ancestry,
religion, marital status, age, disability or receipt of public assistance or housing
assistance in connection with the rental of a dwelling unit on the Agency
Properties. All applications and rental agreements entered into for such purposes
concerning the Agency Properties shall contain similar non-discriminatory clauses
to such effect.
In addition to the conditions and restrictions confined in rental agreements, ongoing
operation of the Agency Properties will be subject to certain house rules, policies
and regulations. Such rules shall be developed by the Manager, and are subject to
the approval of the Agency Executive Director or designee.
Consistent with the provisions hereof, Manager shall establish the general policies
under which the Agency Properties will operate. Such policies shall include but
are not limited to resident selection criteria and priority guidelines. Such policies
are subject to the approval of the Agency Executive Director or designee.
Manager is authorized to sign and serve for the Agency notices to terminate the
tenancies and other such notices as the Manager deems appropriate; to institute
legal actions in the name of Agency to evict tenants and recover possession of the
units; to recover rents and other sums due; and when expedient to setfie,
compromise and release such actions or suits or reinstate such tenancies. Where
legal assistance is needed for such matters as enforcing the collection of rent or
eviction of a tenant, such action shall be through counsel designated or approved
by Agency. Manager is authorized to appear in court on Agency's behalf, with
counsel, as necessary.
10.
Manager shall not knowingly permit the Agency Properties or any portion thereof
to be a site for the use, generation, treatment, manufacture, storage, disposal or
transportation of hazardous materials (as defined herein) or otherwise knowingly
permit the presence of lm?oydous materials in, on or under the Agency Properties.
"Hazardous materials" shall mean any "hazardous substance" as defined in state or
federal law, any "hazardous water," "infectious waste" or "hazardous material"
under federal law or under the California Health and Safety Code or the California
Water Code. For the purposes of this Agreement, the term "hazardous materials"
shall not include ordinary construction and/or rehabilitation materials, gardening
materials, household products, office supply products or janitorial supply products
customarily used in the rehabilitation, maintenance or management of residential
apartment projects or associated buildings and grounds, or typically used in
residential activities in a manner typical of other residential developments which
are comparable to the Agency Propert/es, so long as the same are maintained, used
and stored in commercially normal fashion.
R:\HOUSING\WF~TC-'T97.s'rF 6/2/97 e~d 1 3
The Agency shall indemnify, defend and save Manager and Manager's respective
officers, directors, shareholders and employees harmless from and against any and
all of the costs (including attorneys' fees), penalties and charges assessed against
or imposed upon Manager by reason of the Agency or any third party keeping on
or around the Project, whether prior or subsequent to the date of this Agreement,
for use, disposal, treatment, generation, storage or sale of any substances, wastes,
or materials designated as, or containing components designated as haTardous,
dangerous, toxic or harmful and/or which are subject to regulation by any federal,
state or local law, regulation, statue or ordinance (collectively the "Hazardous
Substances"). The Agency shall be exclusively liable for any clean-up, monitoring,
reporting, civil or criminal penalties, charges, fees or expenses (including
attorney's fees or costs) with respect to the Hazardous Substances, and Agency
shall indemnify and defend Manager against same. Manager shall immediately
notify Agency should he/she have any knowledge of the presence or storage of any
hazardous substances on the property.
C. INCOME AND DISBURSEMENTS
Manager shall prepare and submit to Agency a proposed Operating Budget for the
Agency Properties, to include capital expenditures, for the forthcoming year
concurrent with the execution of this document for the current fiscal year, and not
hter than June 1st of each year the contract is in effect. The approved budget shall
be the basis for operating the Agency Properties during the ensuing year. Upon
approval of the budget by the Agency, Manager shall use all reasonable efforts to
ensure that the operating and capital expenditures shall not exceed the approved
budget. The approved budget for the period December 1, 1996 through June 30,
1997 is attached hereto as Exhibit C.
2. Rent and Security Deposits.
Manager will collect rents, security deposits and all other receipts and
deposit such monies into Manager's operating account to be held at an
F.D.I.C. insured banking institution.
Upon termination of the tenancy by the tenant or Manager, Manager shall
disburse the security deposit appropriate at the termination of the tenancy.
Security Deposit refunds, if any, shall be made to tenants within 23 days
or the time prescribed by law. Manager is not liable for tenant damages,
including unpaid rent, which exceed the security deposit.
Co
If the rental agreement contains a "Late Fee" charge, Manager shall be
entitled to such fee as additional compensation for the additional time and
expenses of collecting the delinquent rental payment. Late fee charges shall
not exceed $25.00.
R:~qOUSING\WESTC'IX~.STF 6/2/97 cad 14
3. Disbursements.
ao
Manager shall pay from gross receipts all operating expenses and such other
expenses as are set forth in the approved operating budget, or as may be
authorized in writing by the Agency Executive Director or designee.
bo
No disbursement of Agency funds shall be made unless consistent with a
line item on the approved budget. No disbursement which exceeds $1,000
can be made without the prior written approval of the Agency Executive
Director or designee. Notwithstanding the foregoing, emergency repairs
in excess of this amount can be made, if the Manager deems such
expenditures are necessary for the immediate protection of the Agency
Properties from damage or persons from injury.
Agency shall reimburse Manager promptly for any monies which Manager
may elect to advance for the account of Agency. Nothing herein contained,
however, shall be const_rued to obligate Manager to make any such
advances.
do
Agency assumes full responsibility for the payment of any expenses and
obligations incurred in connection with the proper and reasonable exercise
of the Manager's duties set forth in this Agreement, to the extent such
expenses are included in the approved budget or otherwise authorized by
the Agency Executive Director or designee.
Manager shall not pay from the Agency account interest or amortization on
mortgages, taxes or assessment unless Agency, in writing, directs Agent to
do so.
Any excess of a $3,000 ledger balance in the operating account for each
Agency Property at the end of any calendar month shall be forwarded to the
Agency along with the Manager's submission of financial reports for the
preceding month pursuant to Section E of this Agreement.
D. REPAIRS, MAINTENANCE AND SERVICE CONTRACTS
Manager shall do everything reasonably necessary for the proper management of
the Agency Properties, including periodic inspections, the supervision of cleaning
and maintenance and arranging for such improvements, alterations and repairs as
may be required of Agency.
Manager shall maintain and preserve the Agency Properties in good condition and
repair. Manager shall not remove, demolish or substantially alter any of the
improvements in the Agency Properties without the prior written consent of the
Agency Executive Director or designee, other than to make repairs in the ordinary
R:\HOUSING\WESTC"rg~.$TF 6/2/97 cad ] ~
course of business and as have been set forth in the approved annual operating
budget, which repairs shall serve to preserve or increase the value of the Agency
Properties. Manager shall cause to be completed promptly and in good and
workmanlike manner the rehabilitation of any improvements which may now or
hereinafter be constructed on the Agency Properties and shall promptly restore in
like manner any improvement which may be damaged or destroyed therein from
any cause whatsoever. Manager shall comply with all laws, ordinances, rules,
regulations, covenants, conditions, restrictions and orders of any governmental
authority now or hereinafter affecting the conduct or operation of the Agency
Properties or requiring any alteration or improvement to be made thereon.
Manager shall not commit, suffer or permit any act to be done in, on or upon the
Agency Properties or any part thereof in violation of any such laws, ordinances,
rules, regulations or orders.
Manager shall establish and continuously conduct an ongoing maintenance
program, which shall include the following:
(a) Scheduled preventative maintenance and repair of installed equipment in
accordance with manufacturers' recommendations.
(b) Routine repairs to kitchen appliances, electrical, plumbing and heating
equipment.
(c) Preventative annual dwelling unit inspections to regularly and consistently
ascertain the condition of each dwelling unit.
(d) Preventative regular inspections of common areas and equipment as well as
regular schedules (daily, weekly, monthly, quarterly, etc.) for maintaining the
same. This will include maintenance of exterior areas to keep grounds free of
litter, trash and paper. Parking areas will be maintained in good repair and free
from dirt and litter. Common areas such as hallways and laundry rooms will be
swept and cleaned daily and kept free of trash and other debris. Garbage removal
will be effected through arrangements with a contractor. The trash areas will be
swept daily. Extermination services will be contracted with to provide a high level
of sanitation and cleanliness.
(e) Contracting with a landscape firm to maintain the landscaped areas in an
attractive and healthy condition.
(f) Interior painting and redecorafion of individual dwelling units shall occur every
three to five years based on need, substantiated by the annual physical inspection,
or as occupancy changes, or as the Manager or its management agent may
otherwise deem necessary.
(g) Manager will employ a maintenance work order procedure in the Agency
R:~-IOUSING\WESTCT97.$TI~ 6/'2197 cad 1 6
Properties to adequately document requests for work and promptness within which
the work has been completed. Ordinarily, it is anticipated that routine maintenance
requests will be reasonably completed within 72 hours.
Manager agrees to execute contracts for utilities, maintenance and safety of the
Agency Properties as the Manager deems necessary or advisable. Agency gives
Manager authority to execute contracts not to exceed one month and the amount
payable not to exceed one month and the amount payable shall not exceed $1,000
per month without written permission of the Agency. Agency agrees to assume the
obligation of any contract so entered into at the termination of this Agreement.
E. RECORDS AND REPORTS
Manager shall maintain accurate records of all monies received and disbursed in
connection with its management of the Agency Properties. The records shall be
open for inspection by Agency during regular business hours upon reasonable
notice.
Manager shall submit monthly statements of all receipts and disbursements on or
about the 15th day of the following month. The monthly statement shall include
documentation of the relationship of those receipts and disbursements to a line item
on the approved budget, or if none, an explanation of why not.
Manager shall submit an annual report (the "Annual Report") to the Agency. The
Annual Report shall include for each rental unit the rental rate and the income and
family size of the occupants. The income information shall be supplied by the
tenant in a certified statement on a form provided by the Agency. The Participant
shall submit the Annual Report prior to June 30 of each year, for the preceding
fiscal year.
F. OCCUPANCY STANDARDS AND PREFERENCES
Manager will use due diligence in the screening and selection of tenants and abide
by all fair housing laws.
As vacancies occur, all units on the Agency Properties shall be rented to Lower
Income Households as their principal residence at rents that do not exceed the
lower of those rents prescribed by either Section 50053 of the California Health
and Safety Code or, to the extent that the terms of Federal financial assistance are
u 'ulized, such rents as are prescribed by the terms of such financial assistance (the
"Affordable Rents").
(a) The maximum monthly Affordable Rent for each unit shall be established at one-
twelfth (1/12) of the product of thirty percent (30%) times sixty percent (60%) of the
Riverside County median income, adjusted for family size appropriate for the unit, as
R:\HOUSING\WESTCT97.STF 612197 ~ad 1 7
determined by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, less a
utility allowance as provided by the Riverside County Housing Authority for the Temecula
area for the Section 8 Rental Subsidy Programs.
(b) As used in this Agreement "Lower Income Households" means households earning
not more than eighty percent (80%) of the Riverside County median income, adjusted for
family size, as determined by the California Department of Housing and Community
Development.
3. Pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33411.3, if the Agency refers to Manager
prospective tenants who are displaced by implementation of the Redevelopment Plan for
Redevelopment Project No. 1, or any other redevelopment project of the Agency, such
tenants (if otherwise qualified), shall be granted priority over other applicants in the rental
of available units on the Agency Properties.
R:U-Iousn~o\v, rF. STCT97.STF 6;2/97 ~,d 1 8
EXHIBIT
SHERWOOD APARTMENTS
OPERATING EXPENSE BUDGET FOR THE YEAR ENDRD JUNE 30, 1998
(Accompanying Notes are an Integral Part of this Budget)
Recurring Operating Expenses:
Monthly Average
12 Month
Advertising
Grounds Maintenance
Repairs & Maintenance
Property Management Fees
On-Site Management Fees
Misc. Operating Expenses
Other Contractual Services
Utilities
(Note 1)
$ 60.00
800.00
1,850.00
1,000.00
100.00
185.00
600.00
795.00
$5,390.00
$ 720.00
9,600.00
22,200.00
12,000.00
1,200.00
2,220.00
7,200.00
9,540.00
$64,680.00
Non-Recurring Expenses:
Extraordinary Damage Reserve (Note 2)
Six (6) Future Renovations (Note 3)
Legal Fees (Note 4)
Miscellaneous Expenses
$1,750.00
175.00
50.00
$1,975.00
$ 5,500.00
21,000.00
2,100.00
600.00
$ 29,200.00
Note (1) - This item includes trash collection and pest control.
Note (2) - A contingency reserve has been allocated to cover possible future damages.
Note (3) - An estimate of six (6) renovations due to vacancies has been provided for in this Budget based
upon the average maximum necessary expenditure required to prepare a unit for rental. Based upon past
experience, there is no way to accurately predict the condition of a unit upon a temnt's moveout. This
estimate may prove to be too low based on actual future occurrences.
Note (4) - Legal fees are predicted upon three (3) legal actions being required. Future costs may vary
based upon differing requirements for legal actions. As a policy, Management prefers that tenants move
out as expeditiously as possible avoiding legal action.
Note (5) - No provision has been made for the cost of a new roof on both buildings. Estimates obtained
previously place the replacement at between approximately $12,000 and $18,000.
Note (6) - No provision has been made for any expenses relative to the large subterranean cavity in the
driveway and garage area. There is no way to accurately assess potential damages.
R:\HOUSING\WESTCT97.STF 6;2197 cad 1 9
EXItlBIT 'C'
PUJOL APARTMENTS
OPERATING EXPENSE BUDGET FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1998
(Accompanying Notes are an Integral Part of this Budget)
Recumng Operating Expenses:
Monthly Average
12 Month
Advertising
Grounds Maintenance
Repairs & Maintenance
Property Management Fees
On-Site Management Fees
Misc. Operating Expenses
Other Contractual Service (Note 1)
Utilities
$ 40.00
600.00
750.00
600.00
350.00
200.00
500.00
69.5.00
$ 3,615.00
$ 480.00
7 200.00
9 000.00
7 200.00
4 200.00
2 400.00
6 000.00
7,500.00
$ 43,980.00
Non-Recurring Expenses:
Extraordinary Damage Reserve (Note 2)
Four (4) Future Renovations (Note 3)
Legal Fees (Note 4)
Miscellaneous Expenses
$1,167.00
84.00
65.00
$1,316.00
$ 4,000.00
14,000.00
1,000.00
780.00
$19,780.00
Note (1) - This item includes trash collection and pest control.
Note (2) - A contingency reserve has been allocated to cover possible future damages.
Note (3) - An estimate of four (4) renovations due to vacancies has been provided for in this Budget based
upon the average maximum necessary expenditure required to prepare a unit for rental. Based upon past
experience, there is no way to accurately predict the condition of a unit upon a tenant's move out. This
estimate may prove to be too low based on actual future occurrences.
Note (4) - Legal fees are predicted upon two (2) legal actions being required. Future costs may vary based
upon differing requirements for legal actions. As a policy, Management prefers that tenants move out as
expeditiously as possible avoiding legal action.
R:\HOUSING\WESTCT97.STF 6/2/97 cad 20
.
...
. ,
I'I'EM 4
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAl ~,, ,,.,,..-
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FIN~N-iE
CITY MANAGER '
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
AGENDA REPORT
Executive Director/Redevelopment Agency Members
Mary Jane McLarney, Assistant City Manager
June 10, 1997
FY1997/98 Economic Development Strategic Plan
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Agency Members:
1) Review the FY1997/98 Economic Development Strategic Plan update;
Review and approve the FY1997/98 Marketing Plan;
3) Review and provide direction regarding the funding request of:
a)
b)
c)
Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce
Temecula Valley Economic Development Corporation
Temecula Valley Film Council;
DISCUSSION:
On February 21, 1995, the City Council adopted the first Economic Development Strategic Plan.
This plan was based on the goals set forth in the General Plan and the Economic Development
Element (Attachment A).
The Plan encouraged attraction, retention, and marketing efforts to expand the City's industrial
base. Since that time, staff has prepared updates to the plan based on current conditions. This
report will provide 1997/98 plan updates. The basic elements remain in the plan. Additionally,
for the first time. we have data concerning existing businesses and their labor force.
r :\eyersk\edcatrat.98 I
Fm01oyment rl~t,
Each quarter, the City now receives employment reports which provide data on the history of
our job base and the distribution of jobs by sector. From 1995 to 1996, the number of
manufacturing jobs increased by 174 (3.7%). The manufacturing sector represents 27.7% of
total jobs. It is interesting to note that the average pay for this sector is higher than the
regional average ($34,700 vs. $29,000) indicating that the quality of our jobs is higher than
average for the region.
Additionally, studies are being prepared to determine labor needs of existing businesses to
focus efforts of education. For example, we have identified a need for tool and diemakers and
Mount San Jacinto College is preparing a program for this training. We are also providing
curriculum input to the Temecula Valley Unified School District through the TEAM Program.
We are updating the labor market survey which was done in 1994. This data will be provided
to companies looking to expand or relocate.
Marketing PlAn
The 1997-98 update is included as Attachment C. The plan has proven extremely beneficial
in the planning and success of our economic development and tourism efforts that have
occurred in the Temecula Valley. The success to promote Temecula in both areas are self-
evident. Many businesses have located and expanded in Temecula over the past several years,
thus, creating more local manufacturing jobs. Also, the tourism activity has expanded as
indicated by increased attendance at special events as well as increased tourism exposure in
all areas of the media. The City has received substantial publicity and exposure in publications
such as the Los Angeles Times, AAA Avenues and Buzz Weekly.
Staff relies heavily on the "purchased" services we receive from the Chamber and the EDC,
particularly the leveraging from the numerous volunteer hours received. In addition, the City
works with other local, county and statewide agencies to accelerate business development and
tourism activities through publicity, trade shows, public events, direct mail, real estate and
industry outreach. This cooperative approach to improving upon our economic development
and tourism efforts, has allowed the City to accomplish measurable results with a cost-effective
marketing program.
MARKETING PLAN STATUS
Business Development
Exhibit I
Lead
Agency
Outreach Materials
A. Business Development Kit - Reprint
B. City of Temecula Fact Book (Demographics)
Update
C. Business Testimonial Piece
To Do
New
To Do
City
City
City
r:~syer~k\edcstrat .98 2
III
IV
V
Vl
Direct Mail Literature
CD Rom - Update
Photography Library
Corn,oleted
City of Temecula Business Brochure
Business Development Kit
City of Temecula Fact Book (Demographics)
CD Rom
Selected Industry Outreach
A. Review EDC Research on Individual
Temecula Companies
B. Research Specific Industry Communications
C. Develop & Implement Tactics for Each Industry
Trade Show Participation
D. Retention Committee for Community Business
E. Reception Committee for Businesses
F. Site Selectors Industrial Tour
G. Business Outreach - Golf/Lodging Industry
H. "The Right Fit" Direct Mail Program
Completed
Temecula RNC Host Committee
Trade Show Participation
Regionel Business Media Outreach
A. Press Materials
B. Establish Working News Bureau
Real Estate Outreach
A. Outreach to Commercial Brokers, Builders and Lenders
(i.e. Real Estate Audience Newsletter)
B. Outreach to Business Relocation Consultants
Selected Advertising
A. Develop Print Ad
B. Identify Advertising Venues and Buy Media
Completed
Developed Business Print Ad
Advertised in Business Publication and Newspaper
Community Relations
A. Schedule City Speaking Opportunities
B. Schedule Media Roundtables with Press Enterprise,
Rancho News, KRTM-FM and the Californian
New
On Going
On Going
On Going
On Going
On Going
On Going
On Going
New
On Going
In Process
On Going
On Going
On Going
On Going
New
On Going
On Going
City
City/EDC
City
City
City
EDC
City/EDC
City
City
City/EDC
EDC
Chamber
City
City
City
N/A
City/EDC
City
City
City
City
City
City
City
City
City
City
r:\syer~k\edc~tr~t .98 3
VII
III
IV
Real Estate Facilitator Outreach
Outreach Activity Directed to Real Estate Industry in
Orange and Los Angeles Counties
Completed
One Real Estate Industry Outreach Activity
Tourism
Outreach Materials
A. Press Kit
B. Tourism Brochure - Reprint
Completed
Press Kit
Tourism Brochure
Media Relations
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
I.
J.
Update and Maintain Media Lists
Monthly Event Publicity
Respond to Media Inquiries
Travel Media Outreach
Tourist Guidebook Outreach (new for '97)
Tourism Industry Newsletter
Long-lead Event Calendar
Media Familiarization Tours
Cable/Public Access
Visitors Guide
Completed
Tourism Industry Newsletter
Visitors Guide
Travel Industry Outreach
A. Industry Mailings
B. Trade Show Participation
Coml;)leted
One Tourism Trade Show
Selected Advertising
A. Develop Print Ad
B. Identify Advertising Venues and Buy Media
Completed
Advertising in Two Tourism Trade Publications
New
On Going
To Do
On Going
On Going
On Going
On Going
To Do
On Going
On Going
On Going
On Going
New
On Going
On Going
New
City
City
City
City
City
City
City
City
City
City
City
City
Chamber
City
City
Chamber
City
Chamber
City
Chamber
City
City
City
r :\syersk~,edc~tret .98 4
V
Marketing Workshops
A. Small Business Development Workshop
On Going Chamber
Vl
Integrated Marketing Tactics
A. Table Tents - Reprint
To Do City
CornDieted
Table Tents City
VII
Sponsored Items
A. Tourism Site on World Wide Web
On Going Chamber
/EDC
VIII
Services
A. Rack Service - Expand to Orange County
On Going City
CornDieted
Rack Service in San Diego
City
Although the indicated agency has taken the lead for the tactic, the total outcome of the
FY96/97 Marketing Plan is the result of the hard work of the entire Marketing Committee.
!=conomic DeveloDment P~rtners
The strategic plan sets forth the participation of our partners and their roles in the plan as
follows:
Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce - The mission of the Chamber is "to promote
the economic environment of all member businesses and by doing so will support the
programs which preserve and improve the quality of life."
The Chamber primarily supports small businesses and provides walk-in visitor and tourist
information. Additionally, the Chamber responds to requests for tourism, relocation and
business inquiries and sends corresponding information to prospective visitors, residents
and potential businesses. The Chamber encourages existing businesses and residents
to ~Shop Temecula First" and provides avenues for businesses to promote their products
and services. The Chamber serves as a representative for business legislative issues
that affect the overall welfare of the Chamber Membership. In cooperation with the
school district, the Chamber plans, coordinates and assists in programs that foster and
encourage a viable working partnership among business, educators and students.
The fee to the Chamber, was $85,000 in FY97 (including reprints of the visitors guide).
The FY98 request is for $112,425. An activity report is included in Attachment D.
Temecula Valley Economic DeveloDment CorDoration ¢FDC) - According to their mission
statement, the purpose of the EDC is ~to promote growth, development and
r:\=yersk\edc~trat .98 5
retention...to improve business conditions and job growth...and to assist existing
employers in the area and to encourage their expansion and growth within the area."
EDC membership is composed of a broad spectrum of businesses, professionals, non-
profit organizations, and public agencies.
The FY97 contribution was $61,400 ( excluding matching funds of $10,000). The
FY98 request is for $91,000. Their business plan is included as Attachment E.
Temecula Valley Film Council {Film Council) - "The mission of the Film Council to market
Temecula as a desirable, cooperative, efficient and multi-faceted location destination for
the film, television and advertising industry... to further the interests of Temecula Valley
economic development by attracting the film industry to our area, to act as a liaison
between the film industry and the community, to provide a focal point for all film related
inquiries, to prepare and provide a location library, production and service information
to the industry, to educate local merchants to the opportunities of servicing the film
industry and to promote the relocation of film companies to the area to generate new
jobs."
The FY97 contribution was $30,000. The current year request of $35,000 is included
in their report (Attachment F).
Old Town Mainstreet Association ¢OTTMA) - The mission of OTTMA is "to implement
the Specific Plan for Old Town Temecula using the four point Mainstreet strategy for
downtown revitalization."
Organization - To build a strong membership organization to support financially
and philosophically the Old Town Mainstreet project. To build partnerships with
outside organizations, businesses, media, financial institutions and city
government.
Design - To work closely with the city planning staff, Redevelopment Agency,
Local Review Board, Old Town Task Force as a liaison between those agencies
and the business owners and property owners in Old Town.
Economic Restructure - To develop a BRAG (Business Recruitment Assistance
Group) made up of EDC, City, Chamber of Commerce, OTTMA and appropriate
business representatives within the city to determine a desirable retail/service
business mix in Old Town and to outline those businesses to be recruited to
balance the current mix.
Promotion - To build upon existing special events and promotions and add
several others specifically focusing on Old Town's target markets.
The Old Town Specific Plan calls for a decreasing annual contribution to the
organization. The OTTMA is in the process of developing a five year business plan
which will be brought back by staff at a later date.
r:\syemk\edcstrat.98 6
Inland Fm[)ire Fconomic Partnership (IEEP) - Any local economic development effort
must be coordinated with the County and surrounding cites. This was never more
evident than in the 1993 negotiations with International Rectifier. Staff is currently
working with IEEP and other local cities on a regional marketing effort. Outreach
includes direct mailing, trade show participation, and visits to key Chief Executive
Officers of major companies in Los Angeles, New York, etc. Additionally, the City was
featured in a Los Angeles Times article resulting from our joint marketing program. The
City's contribution to the Inland Empire Marketing Program is approximately $12,000.
This represents nearly 3 times the prior year funding and is based on like increases in
the Marketing Plan and IEEP staffing dedicated to lead generation.
Murrieta/Temecula Rroup (MTR) MTG has a broader mission than economic
development, however, one of their key objectives is "to support for the economic
development efforts of the two cities, county and the local economic development
organization." This group was identified in the EDC proposal as the legislative advocate
for economic development. MTG has never requested any financial assistance from the
City.
Southwest County Alliance - The Southwest County Alliance was created to promote
the many benefits found for the business and real estate communities within the region.
Additionally, the Alliance is working to bring attention to the need for infrastructure
improvements, such as a brine line and better access to fiber optics.
Temecula Valley Vintners' Association - As an organization, the Vintners Association has
the responsibility to work for the improvement of the social, agricultural political and
business environments in which we work and live. The Vintner's Association does not
exist solely for profit, yet profit is essential to their survival. Profit comes from the
quality of their witness and people, their efficiency, pragmatism and productivity. Their
purpose is to pursue the perfection of an age-old art form inextricably linked to the earth
while preserving an agricultural area and lifestyle in the Temecula Valley.
Temecula Valley Balloon and Wine Festival - The mission of the Temecula Valley
Balloon and Wine Festival is ~to produce a premier event with unique, quality family
entertainment that attracts guests from Southern California; directly contributing to the
economic development of the environmentally-conscious master planned community;
thereby, providing proceeds to charitable organizations." The annual City sponsorship
is $10,600.
The key to the success of the Economic Development Strategic Plan is the leverage we obtain
when joining in public/private partnerships.
r:\ayemk~ed(~tret.98 7
Funding Consider~,fions
The Redevelopment Agency has historically provided financial support for the Chamber of
Commerce, Economic Development Corporation, the Film Council and the Old Town Mainstreet
Association. The Fiscal Year 1998 funding requests from these organizations are included as
Attachment D - Chamber of Commerce, Attachment E - EDC, Attachment F - Film Council.
The Old Town Mainstreet Association (OTTMA) is in the process of developing a long range
plan which will be brought to you at a later date. The Agency may purchase all or a portion
of the services of the EDC, Chamber and Film Council.
Concid,sion:
The Economic Development Strategic Plan is a comprehensive approach to promoting the City
of Temecula. It is based on policy set by the City Council focusing on quality of life, attracting
quality business and promoting tourism. The marketing component presented here is a
conservative, directed approach to promote business and tourism and it capitalizes on the
strengths of our community's human resources through our partnerships with various non-profit
organizations.
FISCAL IMPACT: Based on Agency action for items 2 & 3, an FY97-98 budget appropriation
may be necessary.
Attachments: A-
B-
C-
D-
E-
F-
Economic Development Element
Employment Report
Marketing Plan FY1997-98
Chamber of Commerce FY98 Funding Request
Economic Development Corporation FY98 Funding Request
Film Council FY98 Funding Request
r:~yer~k\edc~trat.98 8
CITY OF TElVIECULA
GENERAL PLAN ECONOMIC DEV!=-T.OPMENT
ATTACHMENT A
CITY OF TEMECIJ~ Economic Development Element
!. INTRODUCTION
A. Overview of the Economic Development Element
The purpose of this Element is to provide guidance for economic development within
Temecula's jurisdiction to attain an economically viable community. In this scnse,
economically viable means a providing range of housing and employment o?portuniues
that meet the needs of residents and workers alike, attracting families and businesses
to create demand for pla~r~ed land uses, and establishing and funding public service
levels that preserve Temecula's quality of life.
The Economic Development Element is linked primarily to the Land Use and Housing
Elements. Land use policy, in which the City takes an active role in defining
development intensity, balance and mix of land uses and design guidelines, is
fundamental to economic growth and fiscal well-being. Land use policy also helps the
City plan in advance for the secondary effects of development, including employment
grow.h, infrastructure requirements and :fiscal impacts. Temecula's housing policy is
also linked to economic development planning in that economic relationships exist
between housing types and employment opportunities, as well as between housing
densities and the cost to maintain City service levels. With regard to attracting
industry and maintaining mobility for corporate activities, the Circulation Element is
also important to the economic development strategy.
B. Authorization and Scope
The Economic Development Element is an optional element of the General Plan, as
set forth in the State Planning, Zoning .and Development Laws, California Government
Code §65303. Although the Economic Development Element is not a required element
in the General Plan, the City has requested that one be prepared to consolidate and
codify a gro .wT;ng body of policy concerning the economic and fiscal viability of
Temecula. Since this element is optional, it may be amended by the City Council to
adapt to changing needs and economic conditions.
C. Related Plans and Programs
I. Temecula-Murrieta Economic Development Corporation
The Temecuta-Murrieta Economic Development Corporation (EDC) is a privately
funded program chartered to promote economic growth and development within
Southwestern Riverside County. The EDC aims to accomplish its mission by
improving business conditions and job growth in order to attract medium to large
clean industry employers and to assist existing employers in the area. The EDC's
goals for the subregion complement Temecula's specific economic development
goals. Additionally, the EDC provides technical assistance with economic
research and marketing programs that directly benefit the City.
Date: November 9, 1993 Page 11-1
~ OF 'I'E3~~ Economic Development Element
2. Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce
The Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce is currently providing four
programs related to business development in the Temecula area:
Tourism. The Chamber is currently in the pmc~&q of pumuing a program for
elementary school children from other counties to visit Temecula's historical
disu'ict, wineries, home ranches and museum as a field trip. The purpose is to
educate kids and give them information to take home m their parents, opening the
possibilities of relocating homes or businesses to the area.
Local business promotions. The "Shop Temecula First" program is a year-round
project encouraging citizens to shop locally. The program is designed to educate
consumers that the monies from local sales mx are used for local expenditures.
Local merchants participate in the program by displaying logos and posters for
ad campaigns.
Education. The Chamber offers a busine.~ start-up kit to new and relocating
businesses. The kits contain City guidelines for operating a business, tax
information, City ordinances such as signage, and area information.
Governmental. The Chamber has an active Civic and Developmental committee
which tracks business related legislation and local issue& The Committee
members attend the Planning Commission, Traffic Commission, Parks and
Recreation Commission and City Council meetings and make recommendations
to the board for talcing positions on business related issues.
3. City of Temecula Pubh'city Campaign
Tcmecula has recently launched a national publicity campaign 'to promote the
advantages of locating in Tcmecula. The program included development of a
promotional video and target industry list. This program currently implements
several goals stated in this element, and should be further reviewed to ensure
continuing efforts are in accordance with this clement.
Old Town Specific Plan
The Temecula Old Town Specific Plan is being prepared concurrently with the
C~neral Plan. The Old Town area provides an important retail environment
within a historic setting, making it a key component of Temecula's tourism
industry. Because of its importance to the local economy, the Old Town Specific
Plan should be implemented in accordance with Temecula's stated economic
development goals.
TEM-01UlGP-£~-D~ * Dam: November 9, 1~ Page 11-2
CITY OF TEM~C-'ULA Economic Development Element
II. SUMMARY OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ISSUES
There is an interdependence among economic issues and the overall quality of ldc in
Tcmecula. The high standards for community facilities and sewices attract businesses and
residents. This am'action generates revenues which make high standards possible. Given
its demonstrated attractiveness to industry and residents alike, opportunity exists for
Temccula to t-urther strengthen the local economy and maintain high servic~ levels through
effective economic development planning.
A. Balanced Land Use
As Temecula grows, there will be a need to maintain a level of housing supply which
is affordable to workers in Temceula, given the diversiffed nature o£ the arca's
employment base. This is important for two primary reasons. First, an improved
jobs/housing balance will reduce long-distance commuting and enhance the quality of
life £or all Temecuta residents. Second, a jobs/housing balance will increase the range
of choice for residents and businesses, making Temccula attractive to prospective
residents and employers.
B. Fiscal Viability
Given the economic realities in California, each local jurisdiction must maintain its
own fiscal viability. This will require a combination of land use policy, attraction of
business, and local revenue policy, including taxation. It must be also recognized that
long-term fiscal viability requires in~emental public and private investment, including
development impact fees.
C. Economic Expansion.-
The economy in Tcmecula has expanded very rapidly over the 1983 to 1989 period.
However, there has b~n concern in the community that growth since 1989 may be
flagging. As Temecuta's economic base once again expands, this expansion can
provide a ~'cater range of job opportunities and can help the City meet its fiscal goals.
However, rapid expar~nion can also lead to undesirable impacts on traffic and other
in.f:rastructure capacity.
D. Employment Growth
Temecula's job base grew very rapidly during the 1980s. The number of jobs in
Temccula increased f:rom about 4,000 in 1983 to over 15,000 by 1992. This growth
represents an ~nnual growth rate of about 18 percent, significantly higher than growth
in both the Riverside-San Bernardino Metropolitan Area and Southwest Riverside
County. Based on economic trends and projections for the Southern California region,
the number of jobs in the Temecula area is projected to increase by between 30,000
and 53,000 by 2010.
TI~vI-OlUlOP.£CDEV * Date: Novcm~r 9, 1~ Page 11-3
CITY OF THM~CUL,A Economic Development Element
E. Development Capacity
During the 1980s, the area that is now T:mecula experienced rapid growth,
tr.n-~itioning from a rmidcntial-oficnted suburban community into an employmorn
c~nter for southwmmrn ILivcmidc County. Even under curmot rec~sionary conditions,
si?ificam development potential still r~mains for additional employment and
residential development within the City and sphere of influence, with over 3,330 acres
proposed for employment and about 1,275 acrm/or retail development. As ~c. onomi¢
recovery occum, Temccula will once again cxpcr/cnc~ the pressures of development.
Within this context, City officials and community mcmbcr~ have ~cognizexl the n -r.~:t
to develop an economic s~ratcgy to guide future economic growth.
F. Industry. Growth
Tcm~ula's maaufacturiag b~e has shown strong growth in the high t~haology
industries and moderate growth in other industrim. Tcmecula scrvm as a regional
retailing center, with about $2.00 in retail sales for every $1.00 of demand within the
City Iimits. Tcmecula has also grown rapidly in the scrviees sector, particularly in
business and professional services.
G. Tourism
Community leaders have expressed a dinire to see tourism expanded beyond the realm
of Old Town and the wineries into a commercial recreation industry which will
generate positive economic impacts for Temecula. Preliminary economic analysis of
the Temecula area indicates tha~ additional diversification is currently needed in
lodging, amusement and recreation service,~.
T~-01UIGP-£C.D~V * Dam: Novcml:~r 9, 1993 Pag~ 11-a
Economic Development Elemcnr
I!!.GOALS AND POLICIES
Goal 1
Development of a swong base of clean manufacrttring activities which employs
a siallied labor force and can be successfully integrated into Temecula's
community character.
Discussion
Tcmecula has maintained high standards for manufacturing activity which have
enhanced its attractiveness to both employers and residents. With additional land
reserved for manufacturing activities, the City must continue to guide the location,
design, and function of industry throughout its development cycle.
Policy 1.1
Attract and retain industry that complements Temecula's character and
takes advantage of Temecula's 1oeational advantage for goods movement
and corporate mobility.
Policy 13
Encourage the growth and expansion of existing industry by providing high
quality municipal services, facilities, and economic development assistance.
Policy 1-3 Maintain a local regulatory environment that is favorable to clean industry..
Policy 1.4
Provide technical assistance to industries that will bc a:ffcctcd by new
regional air quality regulations and other developing regional regnlatiom.
Goal 2
Diversification of the economic base to include a range of manufacturing,
retail and service activities.
Discussion
The economy in Temecula has b~n expanding very rapidly, providing job
opportunities and generating riscally positive development patterns. The Temecula
economy has shown rec~nt divemification in both manufacturing and services.
Since Temecula has not yet completed its real estate development cycle, the
economic base can be expected to diversify further, with an increased level of
professional services and a more mature retail base. Areas where additional
diversification is needed may include: the financial sector, medical and health
services, retail (particularly in general merchandise and apparel), lodging,
recreation and other visitor-oriented services.
Pohcy
2.1
Provide for industrial land uses which facilitate a variety of user types,
including manufacturing space, storage and distribution, back-of:rice space,
and research and development space.
Policy
Plan for land use and development patterns that allow succession of use
and will adapt to Temecula's economic conditions.
TEM-01LIIOP-£C. DEV · Dam: November 9, 1993 Page 11-$
CITY OF TEMEC-'ULA Economic Development Element
Policy 2.3
Policy 2.4
Policy 2.5
Promote development of properly 1o~atccl and well designeel commcrcia~
centers to meet the diverse service needs of the City.
Promote retail and other support activities that provide a broader selection
of high-quality goads and scrvicc~ for residents, workers and tourists,
including apparel, general merchandise, home fia'nishings and appliances.
Use redevelopment powcm and opportunities to enhance development
opportunities.
Goal 3
Discussion
Policy
Maintain an economic base to provide a sound fiscal foundation for the City'
as well as quality commnnity facilities and high service levels.
Prior to incorporation, the Tcmccula area cxpericneexi rapid growth under the
jurisdiction of Rivcmidc County. With incorporation and the ability to capture
more local revenues, the City is now able to conduct fiscal planning in the context
of economic development. With economic development planning, Temccula has
an even greater oppormuity to influence its fiscal base, resulting in a fiscal balance
across land uses.
3.I
Policy 3.2
Policy 3.3
Policy 3.4
Encourage a pattern of development that balances revenue generating land
uses in phase with other uses that have negative fiscal impacts.
Encourage the growth or rclocation of industries that generate local tax and
employment advantages.
Evaluate fiscal' impacts of new development on an ongoing basis and
provide appropriate mitigation strategies.
Take advantage of Tcmccula's regional capture of taxable sales and
continue to establish Tcmccula as a retailing center along the Interstate 15
corridor.
TEM-OIUlOP.F.g. DEV · Dam: Novcrabs. 9, 19t73 Page 11-~
CITY OF TEM~CUL, A Economic Development Elernent
Goal 4
Discussion
Policy
Establishment of a diverse education and traitting and job placement system
which will develop and maintain a high quality work force in Temecula.
Residents and cmploycr~ have identified education as a key element in developing
the long-range economic base in Temeeula. By pwviding superior educational
opportunities and resources, with an emphasis on practical educational programs
£or the job mix required to serve the community, many residents will prei:r to
work: within the City. A ~11 range of adult education, retraining, special
education, vocational/technical education and collcg¢/univemity level facilities and
curriculums should be provided, aimed at responding to the educational n'--,m~:is of
the community through each phase oi development.
4.1
Policy 4.2
Pohcy 4.3
Support economic development goals through a range of ~ucation and
training activities.
Establish a proactive, periodic dialogue early in the platming proc:.ss
between the City and educational institutions, including school distric~ and
community colleges, on issues related to the phasing of development,
service standards and demands.
Explore the potential for a comprehensive cxmnsion center titrough UC
Riverside and/or the California State Unive~ity system.
Goal 5
Discussion
Pohcy
Promote the advantages to businesses of locating in Temecula, including cost
advantages, amenities, housing, community activities and civic services.
Temecula currently has a number of favorable employment growth conditions -
including demonstrated attractiveness to industry and an ideal locatiohal
advantages for company headquartem. The City wishes to focus future efforts on
continuing to attract high quality clean industry. However, with the current
regulatory environment and rising land price.s, the City may need to clearly define
incentives for businesses to locate in Temecula instead of other communities.
5.1
Pohcy 5.2
Policy 5.3
Policy 5.4
Develop and maintain a marketing program to publicize the virtues of
relocating to Temecula.
Monitor the economic conditions in Temecula in comparison to other
locations in California and throughout the nation to determine relative
advantages.
Monitor the supply of housing in relation to the supply of jobs in terms of
to balance area-wide jobs, households, worker earnings and housing
expenses.
Monitor existing businesses in Temecula and identify the elements of a
business retention program.
'r~.~4~m2m,.~c.~, · Date: November 9, 19~Y3
Page 11-7
C'[TY OF TEIVIE~ Economic Development Element
Goal 6
Discussion
Policy
Develop Temecula as a comprehensive., recognizable tourist destination, with
a range of at'tractions throughout and beyond the sphere of influence.
Because of its wine country location and historical si~m'~ifieane~, Temecula has
become a limited tourist destination point. For tourism to play an effw. tive role
in the local economy, however, the industry must expand beyond Old Town and
seasonal attractions and provide for year-round activities capable of generating
greater tourist interest. Community leade~ have expressed the de.sir~ to expand
Temeeuta'$ tourism industry in a manner that complements established residential
areas as well as businesses.
6.1
Policy 6.2
Policy 6.3
Policy 6.4
Encourage and enhan~ cooperative eft. am with the wine-making industry
in the Tcmccula Valley to promon: Tcmeeula as a destination resort.
Identify commercial recreation, convention and resort activities - including
goLf-oriented resorra - that can take advantage of Tcmecula's character and
climate, while complementing wine-making activitiea.
Revitalize and enhance Old Town to expand its role in local taurism and
to improve its attractiveness, accessibility, and economic vitality.
Enhance the City's image through development of cultural facilities,
including performing am, museums.
Date: November 9, 1993 Page 11-8
CITY OF TEMECULA
EMPLO~ REPOKT
ATTAC~B
Employment
CITY OF TEMECULA
SECTION 4
EMPLOYMENT
Temecula's emergence as a center of job growth is primarily the result of the migration of firms
and people to the Inland Empire from the Southland's coastal counties. This migration is occur-
ring as the density of land development in Orange, Los Angeles and San Diego Counties has cre-
ated a shortage of manufacturing, distribution and housing space, and increased space costs.
In most cases, this phenomena is increasing the demand for business space and homes along
transportation corridors in cities directly adjacent to Orange and Los Angeles Counties.. Teme-
cula is unique in two ways. It has been able to get firms and families to leap frog past many miles
of undeveloped land to locate within its borders. And, the jobs coming to the city are better
paying than the Inland Empire average.
Why? Since the city's inception, local leaders have undertaken a consistent and successful pro-
gram to lure high technology firms to the area. These efforts have been aided by the city's physi-
cal beauty and moderate climate. Meanwhile, the completion of the 1-15 freeway has given
commuters and firms located in Temecula ready access to San Diego and Orange County mar-
kets, while allowing them to avoid the land restrictions and high costs of those areas.
Employment
Between the first six months of 1991 and 1996, CA Employment Development Department show
that Temecula's employment rose from 13,590 to 19,714 (Exhibit 43), up 6,124 jobs or an very
rapid 45.1%. The city's economy has begun to specialize with 5,455 of its total jobs in manu-
facturing (Exhibit 44). Consistent with the city's development policies, Manufacturing (2,246)
and Distribution & Transportation (643)accounted for 47.2% of new jobs (Exhibit 45).
From 1991-1996, Temecula's annual job growth rates have far exceeded the 0.6% to 3.7% rates
for the Inland Empire (Exhibit 46) except in 1995. This growth trend has altered the make up of
the city's economy with manufacturing moving from 23.6% of employment in 1991 to 27.7% in
1996 (Exhibit 47-8).
('ily of Trmrcula
k~, l'~rpan. d by Jolm E. Ilusino~, 1'1-1). l'a~e 24
Employment
Pavroll
The payroll expended by firms located in Temecula has followed a pattern similar to employ-
ment, though its growth has been more aggressive. In 1991, city payrolls totaled $153 million.
In 1996 they reached $248 million, up $95 million or 62.1% (Exhibit 49). When adjustment is
made for the 11.7% increase in the Los Angeles-Anaheim-Riverside Consumer Price Index, the
purchasing power of this payroll was up 50.3% (Exhibit 50). From 1991-1996, payroll growth
in Temecula was dominated by Manufacturing ($48 million) which alone accounted for 50.5% of
the city increase (Exhibit 52). Construction, and Engineering & Management suffered declines.
In 1996, the Manufacturing sector had the largest payroll ($95 million), followed by Retail Trade
($35 million) and Government, Education & Utilities ($26 million) (Exhibit 51).
Averace Pay Per Worker
Pay per worker in Temecula rose from $22,480 in 1991 to $25,115 in 1996, an 11.7% increase.
However, this was exactly offset by the 11.7% increase in prices, leaving the average worker
with almost exactly the same standard of living (Exhibit 53-53). The entire growth in the pur-
chasing power of Temecula's payroll was thus from the increased number of workers in the city.
Within the sectors, Temecula is unusual in having Manufacturing and Distribution & Transporta-
tion as its highest, and third highest paying sectors. Along with Engineering & Management and
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate these sectors averaged over $30,000 (Exhibits 55-56). The
lowest paying sectors, averaging below $20,000, were those involving consumer services, agri-
culture and employment agencies.
Number & Size Of Firms
The number of firms in Temecula grew slowly from 1991-1994, rising from 1,189 to 1,255. In
1995 and 1996 the number increased rapidly to 1,533 as Califomia's recession began to end
(Exhibit 57). The 133 new firms in Distribution & Transportation (53), Business Service (41)
and Manufacturing (39) firms were roughly matched by the 115 new firms in Consumer Service
(59) and Retail Trade (56) (Exhibit 58-60). The gains in the latter were in rough conformance to
economic theory that states that when new basic tier firms bring money to a community, a sec-
ondary tier of firms will be created as that new money is spent locally on consumer goods and
services.
Temecula's economy is dominated by small firms, with the average number of employees fluctu-
ating from a low of 11.4 employees in 1991, to a high of 14.2 in 1994 (Exhibit 61). In 1996, the
only exception to the small size rule was in the Government, Education & Utility sector (103).
Otherwise, only the Manufacturing (42), Hotel & Amusement (21) and Retail Trade (16) sectors
exceeded the city average (Exhibit 62).
Accuracy Check
Comparing data for the full years 1991-1995, to those for the six months 1991-1995, reveals no
essential differences in the behavior of employment, payroll or firm information. The use of first
six months data, to allow the inclusion of 1996 information, thus seems warranted.
~ 'it?.' of Temecula
P~epa~ed ~' John F2 llusing, Pitl).
Page 25
ITEM 16
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVe...L.
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF TEMECU~
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Gary Thornhill, Community Development Director
June 10, 1997
Award a Professional Se~ices Agreement to Urban Design Studio to prepare the
Southside Specific Plan
Prepared By: Saied Naaseh, Associate Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council Award a Professional Services Agreement in the Amount
of $61,700.00 to Urban Design Studio to prepare the Southside Specific Plan
and authorize the City Manager to sign Agreement.
BACKGROUND
The General Plan designates the area west of 1-15 to the City Limits between Rancho California
Road and Route 79S as Specific Plan. This area includes two previously approved specific
plans, the Old Town Specific Plan and the Westside Specific Plan. The Southside Specific Plan
covers the majority of the remainder of the area not included in those specific plans,(refer to
Attachment 1 for the project boundary map). On August 22, 1995, the City Council directed
staff to prepare the Southside Specific Plan.
The City received five proposals to prepare this specific plan (refer to Attachment 2 for a list
of consultants). The Selection Committee interviewed all five consultants and recommended
Urban Design Studio (refer to Attachment 3 for a list of Selection Committee members). The
major focus of this specific plan is to improve the aesthetics of the area in terms of architecture
and landscaping. In addition, a Land Use Plan will be prepared to address the land use issues
in the area. The main focus of this Land Use Plan is to encourage uses that do not directly
compete with uses in Old Town and provide a transition of uses into Old Town.
FISCAL IMPACT
The fiscal impact of this project is $61,700. The Community Development Department has
already included $70,000 in the FY 96-97 budget, Account Number 001 161 999 5248.
Attachments: 1.
2.
3.
4.
Project Boundary Map - Page 2
Consultant List - Page 3
Selection Committee Members - Page 5
Agreement between City of Temecula and Urban Design Studio - Page 7
R:\$OUTHSP%CONTRT.CC 614197 ~a 1
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
PROJECT BOUNDARY MAP
R:\SOUTHSP~CONTRT.CC 6/3/9'7 m 2
PROJECT
BOUNDARY
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
CONSULTANT LIST
R:~SOUTHS~CONTRT.CC 6/31F7 m 3
Urban Design Studio
PBR
Envicom
RNM
Keith International
R:\~OUTI-~P~CONTRT.CC 6/3/F7 =a 4
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
SELECTION COMMITTEE MEMBERS
R:\SOUTHSP~CONTRT.CC 6/3/~'/sn 5
Steve Ford, Council Member
Linda Fahey, Chair Person of the Planning Commission
Ron Parks, Principal Engineer
Debbie Ubnoske, Planning Manager
Beryl Yasinosky, Development Services Analyst
R:\SOU'I'HSP~CONTRT.CC 6/4/97 sn 6
ATTACHMENT NO. 4
AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF TEMECULA AND URBAN DESIGN STUDIO TO PREPARE
THE SOUTHSIDE SPECIFIC PLAN
R: \SOIYTH$I~CONTR?.CC 614/97 ~a 7
PROFES,qIONAI. ,qF. RVICF. q
This Agreement was made and entered into this 10th day of June 1997, by and between the
City of Temecula ("City"), a municipal corporation, and Urban Design Studio hereinafter called
("Consultant").
The parties hereto mutually agree as follows:
1. Services. Consultant shall perform the ta_uks set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto.
2. Performance. Consultant shall at all times, faithfully, industrially and to the best
of his ability, experience and talent, perform all tasks described herein.
3. Payment. The City agrees to compensate the Consultant for its services based upon
the costs set forth in Exhibit B. The total cost of this contract shall not exceed $61,700, which
represents the total compensation to be paid to Consultant by City for all work to be done by the
Consultant. The total cost for this contract shall include the costs of duplication for all reports and
documents described in Exhibit A. The City Manager may approve additional payments, not to
exceed $10,000.00 for additional or supplemental work. Such costs for work under this contract
shall be reimbursed only if the work is approved by the City as to its nature, type, amount, and
staff performing the services. The City shall withhold ten percent (10%) of the cost of this
contract until all work on this project, as specified in Exhibit A, has been completed to the
satisfaction of the City.
Consultant shall submit invoices upon the completion of the work activities contained in
Exhibit A, except that such invoices shall never be submitted more than once in any thirty (30)
day period. Such invoices shall specify the completed work task(s) included on the invoice, the
total amount invoiced to date, and the total amount outstanding. Within thirty (30) days of
submittal of any invoice, the City shall either approve said invoice or return it to Consultant
specifying any objections. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of the approval of the
invoice.
4. Amendments. This Agreement may be amended so long as such amendment is in
writing and agreed upon by both the City Council and Consultant.
5. Ownership Of Documents. Upon satisfactory completion of, or in the event of
termination, suspension or abandonment of, this Agreement, all original documents, designs,
drawings and notes prepared in the course of providing the services to be performed pursuant to
this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City and may be used, reused or otherwise
disposed of by the City without the permission of the Consultant. The Consultant may, at its
option and expense, elect to have the work products for this project copyrighted jointly with the
City of Temecula.
R:\FORMS\CONTRACT.SVC 5/30/9'7 klb
6. City Responsibility. The City shall make all reasonable efforts to cooperate with
Consultant in the completion of this project, including but not limited to:
a. Designating a single representing authority with whom Consultant can fulffil
Consultant needs.
b. Prompfiy notifying Consultant of any dissatisfaction with Consultants
performance or any deviation from the tasks specified in Exhibit A.
c. Providing City documents and reports to Consultant at no cost.
7. Termination. The City may terminate this Agreement without cause so long as
written notice of intent to terminate is given to Consultant at least ten (10) days prior to the
termination date. In the event of termination, Consultant shall be paid for the services performed.
8. Indemnification. The Consultant agrees to indemnify and save harmless the City
of Temecula, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims,
demands, losses, defense cost, or liability of any kind or nature which the City, its officers, agents
and employees may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death
of persons, or damage to property arising out of Consultants acts or omissions under the terms of
this Agreement, excepting only liability arising out of the sole negligence of the City.
9. Consultant Staff. The Consultant Principal in Charge, Mark J. Brodeur, shall be
responsible for the professional services required to complete the activities identified in Exhibit
A. Modifications to Consultant's staffing, including subconsultants for this project, shall be made
only with the prior written approval of the City.
10. Status of Consultant. Consultant is an independent contractor in all respects in the
performance of this Agreement and shall not be considered an employee of the City for any
purpose. No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the
performance of this Agreement. Except as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries,
wages, or other compensation to Consultant for performing services hereunder.
11. Term. This Agreement shall commence on June 11, 1997, and shall remain and
continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than June 30,
1998.
12. Subcontracts. The Consultant shall not enter into any subcontracts for services to
be rendered toward the completion of the Consultant's portion of this Agreement without the
consent of the City. Upon termination of this Agreement, Consultant's sole compensation shall
be for the value of service rendered to the City.
13. Default. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under the terms of this
Agreement, the City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any
work performed after the date of default. Default shall include not performing the tasks described
herein to the reasonable satisfaction of the City Manager of the City. Failure by the Consultant
R:~'OR~$\CONTRACT.$VC 5/'30/97 k~
to make progress in the performance of work hereunder, if such failure arises out of causes
beyond his control, and without fault or negligence of the Consultant, shall not be considered a
default.
Any disputes regarding performance, default or other matters in dispute between the City
and the Consultant arising out of this Agreement or breech thereof, shall be resolved by
arbitration. The arbitrator's decision shall be final.
Consultant shall select an arbitrator from a list provided by the City of three retired judges
of the Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services, Inc. The arbitration hearing shall be conducted
according to California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1280, tt_a~. City and Consultant shall
share the cost of the arbitration equally.
14. Notices. Notices shall be given pursuant to this Agreement by personal service on
the party to be notified, or by written notice upon such party deposited in the custody of the
United States Postal Service addressed as follows:
a. City:
Attention: City Manager
City of Temecula
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
b. Consultant:
Mark J. Brodeur, Principal
14725 Alton Parkway
Irvine, CA 92619
The notices shall be deemed to have been given as of the date of personal service, or three
(3) days after the date of deposit of the same in the custody of the United States Postal Service.
15. Entire Agreement. This Agreement and any documents or instrument attached
hereto or referred to herein integrate all terms and conditions mentioned herein or incidental
hereto supersede all negotiations and prior writing in respect to the subject matter hereof.
In the event of conflict between the terms, conditions, or provisions of this Agreement and
any such document or instrument, the terms and conditions of this Agreement shall prevail.
16. Sickness or I~ury of Consultant. Except as provided in the Agreement, City shall
not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for performing services hereunder
for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Consultant for injury or
sickness arising out of performing services hereunder. Consultant shall secure worker's
compensation insurance. Upon request of Consultant, the City shall add Consultant to the City's
worker's compensation policy and the Consultant to the City's worker's compensation policy and
the Consultant shall reimburse the City for the cost of said insurance premiums.
The parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date and year above written.
R:',FORMS\CONTP..ACT.SVC 5130/97 k~
CONSULTANT
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
By:
Ron Bradley, City Manager
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
R:\FORMS\CONTRACT.SVC 5/30/g7 klb
Exl-imrr A
TAgKS TO RE PERFORMED
R:~FORMS\CONTRACT.SVC 5/30/~'/ 10b
2 SCOPE OF WORK (REVISED)
2. SCOPE OF WORK
Task 1.2 - Research of Existing Documents
TASK 1.0 - INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS
OF THE SOUTHSIDE AREA
The foundation for the Specific Plan
planning effort will be constructed during
the inventory. and analysis phase. It will
provide the data and analysis necessary to
understand the ways in which physical,
social, environmental, community facilities,
and public policy issues provide a range of
choices for the study area. Specific tasks
will include:
Task 1.1 Define Project Objectives,
Concerns, and Requirements
The draft components of Temecula's
General Plan, Old Town Specific Plan
zoning ordinance, Citywide Design
Guidelines, streetscape plans. and other
existing plans, policies, and ordinances will
be reviewed. The purpose of this review is
to identify the public policy parameters
within which the Southside Specific Plan
will be prepared. Opportunities,
constraints, and on-site development/
redevelopment which might result from the
policies and conclusions of the documents
being reviewed will be identified. Potential
measures to capitalize on opportunities and
minimize constraints will be identified.
At the outset of the program, Urban
Design Studio's project manager will meet
with City staff to establish a mutual
understanding of the key issues to be
addressed, refine the scope of work and
project timing, and obtain additional plans,
reports, ordinances, and studies applicable
to the project. Another objective of this
meeting will be to reevaluate the
appropriateness of the proposed project
boundaries and to either expand or
contract them accordingly. The most
important purpose of this meeting will be
to clearly define City expectations for the
planning/design program, and to define
basic objectives regarding study area
development.
PRODUCT:
TIME FRAME:
Findings notes
2 days
PRODUCT:
Discussion notes
TIME FRAME: 1 day
Southside Specific Plan Revised-1
Ci~ of Temecula
2 Sco , (l v sg )
Task 1.3 - Field Reconnaissance
A field reconnaissance of the project area
will be conducted. It is recommended that
Urban Design Studio schedule with Saied
Naaseh, project manager, a mutually
agreed upon time to conduct the field trip
together and concurrently with Task 1.1.
Valuable input can be gained from
planners originally involved with the
project.
PRODUCT:
Videotape log, slides
TIME FRAME: 1 day
Task 1.4 - Base Mapping/Exhibits
Urban Design Studio will be responsible
for securing any available aerial and
topographic maps from the City. The City
will make available any existing base maps
for the plan area. The consultants will
prepare a composite base map from the
City provided maps which depict necessary
information. If additional information is
necessary. and required by the City, but
unavailable from the City, the consultant
team will provide such information on a
reimbursable basis. The exact boundaries
of the Specific Plan area must be defined at
this point to avoid contract amendments.
PRODUCT:
Full size and
reduced base maps
(vellum original)
TIME FRAME: 2 weeks
Task 1.5 Baseline Infrastructure
Facilities, and Services Analysis
(deleted)
Southside Specific Plan Revised-1
Ci.ty of Ternecula
2
2 SCOPE OF WORK (REVISED)
Task 1.6 - Market Analysis
(deleted)
Task 1.7 - Opportunities and Constraints
Analysis
Urban Design Studio will identify and
assess opportunities and constraints
including inconsistent building design, and
other development standards.
Land use buffer and ~xansition areas will be
mapped, along with other information
found in the field which could impact a
final planning/design solution.
PRODUCT:
Opportunities and
Constraints Map -
colored
TIME FRAME: 2 weeks
Southside Specific Plan Revised-1
City of Temecula
3
2 SCOPE OF WORK (REVISED)
TASK 2.0 - PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
AND STAFF INPUT
Urban Design Studio knows and has
worked in Temecula where individual
property, rights are of paramount
importance. We urge the City to select a
full-service urban design firm with proven
experience working with citizen advisory
committees.
While we understand the City will work
with the successful firm in determining the
type and level of public input to be
provided, Urban Design Studio suggests the
following (first class) methods that have
proven successful in other similar
downtowns.
The public participation methods that we
have recommended are comprehensive in
their scope. The City requested a "first
class" comprehensive Specific Plan and we
are proposing a fun and informative public
participation process as part of our overall
approach.
feedback.
As currently structured, we are planning to
conduct three workshops with the SC.
SC Workshop #1 - Kickoff, get acquainted.
issues. "Best of" tour. "What is a Specific
Plan?"
SC Workshop #2 - Land use/visioning
charette
SC Workshop #3 - Design Guidelines,
Regulations, Public Improvements
PRODUCTS:
3 meetings, Slide
Presentations,
Questionnaire,
Memorandums
TIME FRAME:
Generally first 2-4
months of process
Task 2.1 Workshops with Southside
Committee
Eariv in the Specific Plan process, the
project team will meet with the "Southside
Committee" to provide orientation to the
process and to receive input regarding
issues and goals for the area that will be
used to develop the draft plan. Staff will be
responsible for assembling the Committee,
arranging the workshop and providing an
introductory overview of the project.
Urban Design Studio will facilitate group
Southside Specific Plan Revised-1
Ci~ of Temecula
4
$¢ov
Task 2.2 - Saturday Storefront Workshop
(Public Workshop #4)
As a method of soliciting further
community input, Urban Design Studio
proposes to hold a one-day "drop-in"
workshop in a location in the Southside
area. This will provide an opportunity for
merchants and community members to
participate in the Specific Plan process in
an informal way, and "on their own terms".
Consultants and staff will be on hand to
discuss the Specific Plan process and
exchange ideas. Appropriate maps and
graphics will be available.
PRODUCT:
Full- or half-day
meeting, input notes,
map graphics
(colored)
PRODUCT:
TIME FRAME:
2- to 3-hour meeting,
meeting notes
8 hours. including
preparation time.
Task 2.4- Personal Interviews
(Local merchants/property owners)
Urban Design Studio will conduct
approximately 15 personal interviews with
preselected (by City) owners, merchants,
and elected officials. These interviews
would be used to solicit the
owner/merchant or elected official's desires
in terms of land use and physical
improvements for the area.
PRODUCT:
Interview Notes
TIME FRAME: 2 days
TIME FRAME: 1 day
Task 2.3 - Joint Workshop with City
Council and Planning Commission I'Public
Workshop #5)
Shortly before or after the Saturday
Storefront Workshop, Urban Design Studio
will hold a joint workshop meeting with the
City Council and Planning Commission.
The purpose of the workshop will be to
identify broad issues relative to the plan
and receive direction on plan development.
The consultant team will be prepared at
this time to discuss findings and action
programs and will solicit feedback from
those present.
Southside Specific Plan Revised-1
City of Temecula
5
2 SCORE OF WORK (REviSED)
Task 2.5 - Public Hearings
Urban Design Studio will attend one
Planning Commission hearing and one City
Council hearing to consider and adopt the
Specific Plan. Extra meetings will be
attended on a $750 per meeting basis.
PRODUCT: n/a
TIME FRAME: 2 days
Task 2.6 - Staff Liaison/
Project Management
Urban Design Studio team members will
maintain continuous contacts with City staff
and participate in regular meetings or
conference calls to monitor progress.
receive input. and feedback. These
meetings will also be used as project
management tools to keep staff and the
consultant team informed. We currently
anticipate a minimum of five meetings in
Temecula with City staff. It is envisioned
that these meetings will be held on
Workshop days to the extent possible.
PRODUCT: N/A
TIME FRAME:
Ongoing during
contract
Regular meetings with staff will be scheduled.
In addition, tt is anticipated that informal,
informational meetings with the Chamber of
Commerce, Downtown Association. specific
properOy owners. Board of Realtors', or other
interested grou£s could be scheduled in
conjunction with the Project Team ~' visits to
the area. They are included at no additional
charge.
Southside Specific Plan Revised- l
Ci.ty of Temecula
SCOPE OF WORK (REVISED)
TASK 3.0 -EXISTING
CONDITIONS ASSESSMENT
(deleted)
TRAFFIC
Southside Specific Plan Revised-1
City of Temecula
7
2 S¢or ov
TASK 4.0 -
FRAMEWORK
DEVELOPMENT
The consultant team will prepare draft
policy and master plan scenarios together
for the Southside Specific Plan area. All
consultants will assist in the development of
review of master plan patterns for their
respective considerations (e.g. Circulation.
Marketing, Infrastructure, Urban Design,
Open Space, etc.)
Task 4.1 - Goals and Policies
The preparation of goals and policies is the
key to success for the Specific Plan
program. While the identification of
existing conditions and evaluation of issues
and opportunities does much to assist in
understanding the study area, it is the goals
and policies which clarify the logic of the
Specific Plan. The goals and policies
provide direction, represent the criteria for
selecting alternatives, and solidi~ the
management plan for the study area's
future.
As part of the review of project
alternatives. a Preliminary Statement of
Goals and Policies will be submitted to the
City, for review.
Refined goals and policies will be
developed as a final product of this task.
PRODUCTS:
Preliminary Goals
and Policies, Final
Goals and Policies
TIME FRAME: 2 weeks
Task 4.2 - Develop Alternative Land Use
Plans
Working with staff and the Southside
Committee, Urban Design Studio will
develop tlxree realistic land use alternatives
for the area. This exercise will be the focus
of the second Southside Committee
Workshop.
Task 4.3 - Southside Master Plan (Vision
Urban Design Studio will prepare a final
master plan following staff, Southside
Committee, public, and elected official
input. We plan to illustrate and color a
wall size exhibit (48"x 48") showing
buildings, feature notes, streets, parking,
streetscape, etc. A feature of this product
will be conceptual site plans for "key vacant
or under utilized sites".
PRODUCT:
Color. preferred
Master Plan/Land
Use Plan Illustrative
TIME FRAME: 3 weeks
Southside Specific Plan Revised-1
City of Temecula
8
2 ScoP~ og WoP, K (R~vts~o)
4.3 - Proposed Infrastructure
Improvements Planning Report
(deleted)
Southside Specific' Plan Revised-
City of Temecula
9
SCOPE OF WORK (REVISED)
TASK 5.0 DRAI~ SPECIFIC PLAN
COMPONENTS
This phase will develop the regulatory and
urban design heart of the Specific Plan:
land use regulations, permitted uses,
development standards, design guidelines,
streetscape, and public improvements. The
components will be put together to
establish the Administrative Draft/Specific
Plan.
Task 5.1 - Land Use and Development
Regulations
Detailed !and use and development
regulations will be formulated for each
subarea Of the Specific Plan area. The
regulations will be formulated in
conjunction with staff input and findings of
other project team members in order to
assure compatibility with the overall vision
for the Southside area. The development
regulations section will constitute zoning
for the planning area and will include the
following elements:
A. General Provisions
Description and purpose of Land Use
Districts
Relation'hip to the City General Plan
Interpretation/Effective Date
Applicability of Standards
Amendments to Plan
Land Use Determinations
Approval Process
Nonconforming Uses
Southside Specific Plan Revised-1
City of Temecula
B. Specific Development Regulations
Primary Function/Location
Principal Permitted. and
Conditionally Permitted
Prohibited Uses
Parcel size, Configuration
Setbacks (front, side, streetside. rear)
Landscape Requirements (percent of
parcel coverage, planting densiF,
parking area landscape requirements,
streetscape percentages)
Height Limitations
Maximum Site Coverage (building
envelope)
Paricing Requirements
C. Special Provisions/Regulations (if
applicable)
.4daptive Reuse Parking Waiver
Special Sign Overlay Zone
Pedestrian Amenity Bonus Program
Nonconforming Sign Removal
Incentive
PRODUCT: Draft Land Use
Regulations
TIME FRAME: 4 weeks
Task 5.2 - Design Guidelines
Tailored design guidelines aimed at
improving the physical and economic image
of the Southside area will be prepared. We
propose to present the design guidelines in
the form of text and illustrations with
notations indicating what the desirable
design elements are and how they are to be
applied. We will focus on the following
10
2 Sco , og WOrK
design components:
· :o Site planning
4° Architecture
4° Circulation
· :. Signage
· :o Landscape/hardscape
Draft Design Guidelines
The design guidelines will incorporate a
combination of design principles, design
guidelines, and design standards. The
component structure of the guidelines will
be as follows:
Site Planning
· :. setbacks
4. buildingplacement/orientation
· :o land use buffenng
· :. service areas
· :. "special"projects - automotive uses,
outdoor dining
Architecture
do ~ and don'ts
architectural context (how to relate or
not relate to Old Town)
acceptable material palettes (theme)
prohibited material palettes
roofdesign/parapet walls
color
wall articulation
contextual scale, bulk. and height
mechanical equipment
storefront/facade design
Circulation
vehicular circulation standards
inter/intra site circulation
space size and design requirements
parking lot buffers and setbacks
driveway throat design standards
handicapped provisions
Advertising Guidelines
sign types/materials/lighting
letter size to sign panel percentage
color
location of signs
freestanding signs
wall or building signs
projecting signs
window signs
Landscaping
acceptable plant palette
planter width
minimum plant sizes
existing landscape retention (trees)
exterior lighting
fencing/screening
Final Draft Design Guidelines
Following staff and public review of the
draft Design Guidelines, Saied Naaseh will
forward a "red ink" modified copy of the
guidelines to Urban Design Studio.
PRODUCT: Draft Design
Guidelines
TIME FRAME: 4 weeks
Southside Specific Plan Revised- I
City of Temecula
11
2 SCOPE OF WORK (REVISED)
Task 5.3 Final Draft Development
Regulations and Design Guidelines
Following receipt of the City's "red ink"
version of the draft, Urban Design Studio
will make appropriate revisions and
prepare a final draft document for inclusion
into the Specific Plan document.
PRODUCTS:
Final Development
Regulations. Final
Design Guidelines
TIME FRAME: 3 weeks
Task 5.4 - Streetscape Improvements
The primary. focus of this task will be to
prepare a Streetscape Improvement Plan
that is consistent with other design
recommendations being made in the design
guidelines and other sections of the Specific
Plan. Relevant input from City staff. the
Downtown Committee, and the joint
workshop with the Council and Planning
Commission will be taken into
consideration.
A. Right-of-Way Alternatives
Urban Design Studio and RBF will review
right-of-way alternatives with input from
out consultant team and City staff. These
alternatives may include medians, safe
crosses. diagonal parking, alley usage, and
street cul-de-sac/closures.
B. Streetscape Plans
Urban Design Studio will prepare
streetscape plans which implement the
goals and objectives of Downtown. The
streetscapes will be stylistically suited to the
historic theme. Components may include:
sidewalk design
new trees
crosswalks/paving/painting
benches
pedestrian lights
trash receptacles
planter boxes
retention or undergrounding
utilities
C. Public Wayfinding System
Urban Design Studio will prepare a public
signage program stylistically suited to the
historic theme and the streetscape elements
selected. Sign components will include:
freeway. identification (?)
directional signage
ent.rv signs
PRODUCT:
Right-of-way
alternatives,
streetscape
components, public
signage program
TIME FRAME: 4 weeks
Southside Specific Plan Revised-1
Citv of Ternecula
12
2 SCOPE OF WORK (REVISED)
Task 5.5 - Economic Implementation
Strategies
(deleted)
Southside Specific Plan Revised-1
City of Temecula
13
2 S¢oP WOR (I v s o)
TASK 6.0 - FINAL SPECIFIC PLAN
Task 6.1 - Administrative and Public
Hearing Drafts
Once component task products and
graphics have been integrated, the
remaining text. including the introduction.
goals, and implementation will be prepared
(Administrative Draft) and submitted to
staff for their "screencheck" review. (5
copies)
Following a review and incorporation of
staff and Southside Committee comments
on the Administrative Draft, twenty. (20)
copies of the Public Hearing Draft will be
transmitted to the City for distribution to
appropriate individuals.
PRODUCTS:
5 copies
Administrative Draft
20 copies and 1
reproducible master
of Public Hearing
Draft
TIME FRAME: 3 weeks
Task 6.2 - Final Specific Plan Document
An index of revisions made during the
review of the Public Hearing Draft
Specific Plan will be maintained as an
ongoing addendum to the final Specific
Plan Report. This will eliminate the need
for repetitive and costly revisions to the
report.
Followirlg City Council adoption of the
report, a final Specific Plan document will
be transmitted to the City. The final
Plans will be based on Urban Design
StudJo's professional evaluation of input
received of the Public Hearing Draft.
PRODUCTS:
One reproducible
master of the Final
Specific Plan (all
text and graphics to
be transmitted on
several computer
floppy disk)
TIME FRAME:
1 month, depending
on Public Hearings
Southside Specific Plan Revised-1
City of Temecula
14
EXI-II~IT I~
PAY1VI~NT SCH~T)UI ~F~
R:\FORMS\CONTRACT.SVC 5130/97 k. lb
COST
The City's revised RFP for the Southside Specific Plan articulated eight specific activities that
should be completed as part of this Specific Plan proposal. The revised RFP requested that
we delete many task related to infrastructure market analysis and traffic. Budgets for these
tasks have been deleted from the final fee. Urban Design Studio feels that there may be other
tasks that should be completed. We feel these tasks are desirable or necessary, therefore our
fee" includes all tasks contained in our proposal.
It should be noted that this is a fixed fee and it is all inclusive. No fees beyond the fees
articulated below will be paid to UDS.
I TASK t TASK DESCRIPTION?: : ': I FEE ]
1.1 Define Project Requirements $ 700.00
1.2 Research of Existing Documents $500.00
1.3 Field Reconnaissance $1,000.00
1.4 Base Mapping $1,500.00
1.5
Baseline Infrastructure Analysis (deleted)
1.6
Market Analysis (deleted)
1.7 Opportunities and Constraints Analysis $3,100.00
2.1 Workshops (3) with Southside Committee $5.000.00
2.2 Saturday Storefront Workshop $1,500.00
2.3 Joint PC/CC Workshop $1,750.00
2.4 Personal Interviews $1,600.00
2.5 Public Hearings $2,500.00
2.6 Staff Liaison/Project Management $4,700.00
3.1
3.2
3.3
Existing Traffic/Parking Report (deleted)
Traffic Improvements Report (deleted)
Final Report (deleted)
Southside Specific Plan Revised-1
City of Temecula
COST
I TASK
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.3
:TASK DESCRIPTION '
Goals and Policies
Develop Alternative Land Use Plans
Southside Master Plan
Infrastructure Planning Report (deleted)
FEE[
$1.000.00
$4,050.00
$5,100.00
5.1
5.2
5.3
5.4
5.5
Land Use and Development Regulations
Design Guidelines
Final Regulations and Guidelines
Streetscape Improvements
Economic Implementation Strategies (deleted)
$3,700.00
$5,0O0.00
$2,00O.0O
$7,000.00
6.1
6.2
Administrative/Public Hearing Drafts
Final Specific Plan
$7,000.00
$3,0O0.00
Grand Total $61,700.00
Southside Specific Plan Revised-I
Ci.ty of Temecula
ITEM 17'
APPROVAl,
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Manager/City Council
Genie Roberts, Director of Finance~j~
June 10, 1997
Authorization to Execute Agreements for the Use of 1997-98 Fiscal Year
Community Development Block Grant Funds
PREPARED BY: Allie Kuhns, Senior Management Analyst}~
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:
Authorize the Mayor to execute the Supplemental Agreements for the 1997-98
Fiscal Year Community Development Block Grant Funds.
That the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute Sub-Recipient
Agreements with the Emergency Food & Aid Program (Senior Center), the Parent
Center, and Valley Intervention Program for Tots (VlP Tots) for administration of
the 1997-98 Fiscal Year Community Development Block Grant Funds.
DISCUSSION: On January 28, 1997, the City Council recommended funding for 1997-98
Fiscal Year Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) projects. The U.S. Department of
Housing Urban Development (HUD) provides CDBG funding for local projects which meet at
least one of the following nationally established goals:
Low/moderate income persons are primarily benefitted by the activity; or
The activity aids in the prevention or elimination of slums or blight; or
The activity meets an urgent (emergency) community development need.
The projects and levels of funding approved by the Riverside Economic Development Agency
(EDA) are as follows:
Temecula Community Center Acquisition $ 211,000
Temecula Recreation and Human Services 15,500
Valley Family Support, Health & Rec Service 13,304
Emergency Food & Aid 10,000
Alternatives to Domestic Violence 1,000
Boys and Girls Club of Temecula 10,000
Operation School Bell 10,000
VlP Tots 1,000
Operation Safe House 500
Parent Center 1,000
TOTAL: $ 273.304
The total approved amount of $273,304 is $11,696 less than the $285,000 which the City
Council recommended for funding during the January 28th meeting. The difference in funding
reduced the amount awarded to the Valley Family Support, Health and Recreation Services
(construction of a new "Parent Center" facility in Murrieta) to $13,304 from the $25,000 which
the City Council had recommended. The total funding approved by the EDA was based on the
City's total allocation of CDBG funds by HUD.
Execution of the 1997-98 Fiscal Year Supplemental Agreements and Sub-Recipient Agreements
facilitates CDBG funding for these projects.
FISCAL IMPACT: None.
Attachments:
Supplemental Agreements
CDBG Sub-Recipient Agreement for VlP Program for Tots
CDBG Sub-Recipient Agreement for Parent Center
CDBG Sub-Recipient Agreement for the Emergency Food & Aid Program
C ty of Temecula
43200 Burness Park Drive · Temecula, CA 92590 · Mail,r~jAddres~: P.O Box 9033 · Temecula, CA 9258%9033
(909) 6946444 · Fax (909) 694-1999
CDBG SUB-RECIPIENT AGREEMENT
Agreement made this 10th day of June, 1997, by and among the City of Temecula (City), a
municipal corporation, and Emergency Food & Aid Program, a private, non-profit organization.
In consideration of the mutual promises set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:
Emergency Food & Aid Program provides emergency food and supplies to senior citizens
in the Temecula Valley. The Emergency Food & Aid Program agrees to provide such
services on a first come, first serve basis to all residents of the City of Temecula who need
and request such services so long as economic resources permit.
The Emergency Food & Aid Program agrees to keep such records, as necessary, to verify
low and moderate income status of clients, and shall provide such data to the City of
Temecula upon request.
The Emergency Food & Aid Program shall defend, indemnify, protect, and hold the City
of Temecula and the County of Riverside, their elected and appointed officers, officials,
and employees, harmless from all claims, damages, losses, or liability of any kind or
nature, including all reasonable attorney's fees and costs or liability of any kind or nature
arising out of the acts or omissions of Emergency Food & Aid Program with respect to its
work pursuant to this Agreement.
The City agrees to provide the Emergency Food & Aid Program with funds equal to the
costs allocable by the City of Temecula as agreed upon by the City, Riverside County
Economic Development Agency, and the service provider.
Emergency Food & Aid Program may request reimbursement from the City of
Temecula by submitting three (3) copies of: the request; appropriate invoices; and
paid receipts with either canceled checks (front and back), or proof of a petty cash
disbursement, to the City of Temecula Finance Department. The City of Temecula
will reimburse Emergency Food & Aid Program from the City's General Fund up
to the City Council approved amount of $10,Q00 for eligible costs incurred after
the County's anticipated authorization date, on or after July 1, 1997.
Costs incurred by the Emergency Food & Aid Program before the County's
authorization date or anticipated authorization date, on or after July 1, 1997, which
are determined by the City of Temecula or the County of Riverside to be unrelated
to the approved CDBG project are ineligible and are not reimbursable by the City.
The City of Temecula will request reimbursement for eligible costs incurred after
the County's anticipated authorization date, on or after July 1, 1997.
This Agreement may not be assigned in whole, or in pan, without the written consent of
the parties.
6. This Agreement shall terminate on June 30. 1998.
This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the subject
matter of this Agreement, and supersedes all prior negotiations, understandings, or
agreements. This Agreement may only be modified by written agreement signed by all
parties.
The Emergency Food & Aid Program shall abide by all of the terms and conditions of this
Agreement and the Cooperation Agreement executed between the County of Riverside and
the City of Temecula dated June 10, 1997, which governs the use of CDBG funds.
Emergency Food & Aid Program shall keep itself informed of all applicable State,
Federal, and local laws and regulations, and the conditions of the CDBG grant to the
County and the City. Emergency Food & Aid Program shall at all times observe and
comply with all such laws, regulations, and conditions.
In witness whereof, the parties have executed this Agreement on the date first written above.
CITY OF TEMECULA
EMERGENCY FOOD & AID PROGRAM
Ronald E. Bradley
City Manager
Authorized Signature/Title
Peter M. Thorson
City Attorney
ATTEST:
June S. Greek
City Clerk
City of Temecula
43200 Bughess Park Drive · Temecula, CA 92590 · IV~il~ng Addr~: P C) Box 9033 · Temecula, CA 925139-9033
(909) 694-6444 · Fax (909) 694-1999
CDBG SUB-RECIPIENT AGREEMENT
Agreement made this 10th day of June, 1997, by and among the City of Temecula (City), a
municipal corporation, and Parent Center, a private, non-profit organization. In consideration of
the mutual promises set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:
Parent Center provides quality educational and personal workshops, seminars, classes, and
support groups to empower parents to build full functioning families. Parent Center agrees
to provide such services on a first come, farst serve basis to all residents of the City of
Temecula who need and request such services so long as economic resources permit.
The Parent Center agrees to keep such records, as necessary, to verify low and moderate
income status of clients, and shall provide such data to the City of Temecula upon request.
The Parent Center shall defend, indemnify, protect, and hold the City of Temecula and the
County of Riverside, their elected and appointed officers, officials, and employees,
harmless from all claims, damages, losses, or liability of any kind or nature, including all
reasonable attorney's fees and costs or liability of any kind or nature arising out of the acts
or omissions of Parent Center with respect to its work pursuant to this Agreement.
The City agrees to provide the Parent Center with funds equal to the costs allocable by the
City of Temecula as agreed upon by the City, Riverside County Economic Development
Agency, and the service provider.
Parent Center may request reimbursement from the City of Temecula by submitting
three (3) copies of: the request; appropriate invoices; and paid receipts with either
canceled checks (front and back), or proof of a petty cash disbursement, to the City
of Temecula Finance Department. The City of Temecula will reimburse Parent
Center from the City's General Fund up to the City Council approved amount of
$1,000 for eligible costs incurred after the County's anticipated authorization date,
on or after July 1, 1997.
Costs incurred by the Parent Center before the County's authorization date or
anticipated authorization date, on or after July 1, 1997, which are determined by
the City of Temecula or the County of Riverside to be unrelated to the approved
CDBG project are ineligible and are not reimbursable by the City.
Co
The City of Temecula will request reimbursement for eligible costs incurred after
the County's anticipated authorization date, on or after July 1, 1997.
This Agreement may not be assigned in whole, or in part, without the written consent of
the parties.
6. This Agreement shall terminate on June 30. 1998.
This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the subject
matter of this Agreement, and supersedes all prior negotiations, understandings, or
agreements. This Agreement may only be modified by written agreement signed by all
parties.
The Parent Center shall abide by all of the terms and conditions of this Agreement and the
Cooperation Agreement executed between the County of Riverside and the City of
Temecula dated June 10, 1997, which governs the use of CDBG funds. Parent Center
shall keep itself informed of all applicable State, Federal, and local laws and regulations,
and the conditions of the CDBG grant to the County and the City. Parent Center shall at
all times observe and comply with all such laws, regulations, and conditions.
In witness whereof, the parties have executed this Agreement on the date first written above.
CITY OF TEMECULA
PARENT CENTER
Ronald E. Bradley
City Manager
Authorized Signature/Title
Peter M. Thorson
City AUorney
ATTEST:
June S. Greek
City Clerk
City of Temecula
43200 Burness Park Drive · Temeodla, CA 92590 · Mailinc3/~ldress' P.O Box 9033 · Temeo~la, CA 92589-9033
(909) 6946444 · Fax 1909) ~94-1999
CDBG SUB-RECIPIENT AGREEMENT
Agreement made this 10th day of June, 1997, by and among the City of Temecula (City), a
municipal corporation, and Valley Intervention Program for Tots (VIP Tots), a private, non-profit
organization. In consideration of the mutual promises set forth herein, the parties agree as
follows:
VIP Tots, through its inter-generational volunteer program, matches senior citizens to at-
risk families with chronically ill or disabled children. The VIP Tots agrees to provide
such services on a fu'st come, fu'st serve basis to all residents of the City of Temecula who
need and request such services so long as economic resources permit.
The VIP Tots agrees to keep such records, as necessary, to verify low and moderate
income status of clients, and shall provide such data to the City of Temecula upon request.
The VIP Tots shall defend, indemnify, protect, and hold the City of Temecula and the
County of Riverside, their elected and appointed officers, officials, and employees,
harmless from all claims, damages, losses, or liability of any kind or nature, including all
reasonable attorney's fees and costs or liability of any kind or nature arising out of the acts
or omissions of VIP Tots with respect to its work pursuant to this Agreement.
The City agrees to provide the VIP Tots with funds equal to the costs allocable by the City
of Temecula as agreed upon by the City, Riverside County Economic Development
Agency, and the service provider.
VIP Tots may request reimbursement from the City of Temecula by submitting
three (3) copies of: the request; appropriate invoices; and paid receipts with either
canceled checks (front and back), or proof of a petty cash disbursement, to the City
of Temecula Finance Department. The City of Temecula will reimburse VIP Tots
from the City's General Fund up to the City Council approved amount of $1,000
for eligible costs incurred after the County's anticipated authorization date, on or
after July 1, 1997.
Costs incurred by the VIP Tots before the County's authorization date or
anticipated authorization date, on or after July 1, 1997, which are determined by
the City of Temecula or the County of Riverside to be unrelated to the approved
CDBG project are ineligible and are not reimbursable by the City.
I~ P~'nted on Re~,cled Paper
The City of Temecula will request reimbursemere for eligible costs incurred after
the County's anticipated authorization date, on or after July 1, 1997.
This Agreement may not be assigned in whole, or in part, without the written consent of
the parties.
6. This Agreement shall terminate on June 30. 1998.
This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the subject
matter of this Agreement, and supersedes all prior negotiations, understandings, or
agreements. This Agreement may only be modified by written agreement signed by all
parties.
The VIP Tots shall abide by all of the terms and conditions of this Agreement and the
Cooperation Agreement executed between the County of Riverside and the City of
Temecula dated June 10, 1997, which governs the use of CDBG funds. VIP Tots shall
keep itself informed of all applicable State, Federal, and local laws and regulations, and
the conditions of the CDBG grant to the County and the City. VIP Tots shall at all times
observe and comply with all such laws, regulations, and conditions.
In witness whereof, the parties have executed this Agreement on the date first written above.
CITY OF TEMECULA
VALLEY INTERVENTION PROGRAM
FOR TOTS (VIP Tots)
Ronald E. Bradley
City Manager
Authorized Signature/Title
Peter M. Thorson
City Attorney
ATTEST:
June S. Greek
City Clerk
File No: 1.TM037, 038, 039, 043, 0.217, 0.218,
0.225, 0.228, 0.233, 1.126
SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT FOR THE USE OF
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS
1
2
3
4
5 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE of the State of California, herein called,
6 "COUNTY," and the CITY of Temecula, herein called "CITY," mutually
7 agree as follows:
8 1. GENERAL. COUNTY and CITY have executed a Cooperation
9 Agreement dated June 29, 1993, whereby CITY elected to participate
10 with COUNTY, which has qualified as an "Urban County" for purposes of
11 receiving Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds, and to
12 assist and undertake essential community development and housing
13 assistance activities pursuant to the Housiog and Community
14 Development Act of 1974, as amended, hereinafter referred to as "Act".
15 Said Cooperation Agreement dated June 29, 1993, is incorporated herein
16 by reference and made a part of this Agreement as if each and every
17 provision was set forth herein.
18 2. PURPOSE. CITY promises and agrees to undertake and assist
19 with the community development activities, within its jurisdiction,
20 by utilizing the sum of $273.304, CDBG Entitlement Funds, as
21 specifically identified in Exhibit "A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, & J"
22 which are attached hereto and consist(s) of 3 pages (each), and by
23 this reference are incorporated herein, for the projects:
24 1.TM037 - Temecula Community Center Acquisition, $211,000
25 1.TM038 - Temecula Recreation and Human Services. $15,500
26 1.TM039-Valley Family Support, Health, and Recreation Service, $13,304
27 1.TM043 - Emergency Food & Aide, $10,000
28 0.217 - Operation School Bell. $10,000
1 0.218 - Boys & Girls Club of Temecula, $10,000
2 0.225 - V.I.P. Tots, $1,000
3 .0.228 - Operation SafeHouse. Emergency Service Transition, $500
4 0.233 - Domestic Violence Services, $1,000
5 1.126 - Parent Center, $10000
6 CITY shall obtain COUNTY's approval, through its Economic Development
7 Agency, of the projects plans and specifications prior to CITY's
8 construction of same when a project consists of a construction
9 activity.
10 3. TERM OF AGREEMENT. The term of this Agreement for the
11 projects shall be for a period of one (1) year from July 1, 1997 to
12 June 30, 1998, and proceed consistent with the completion schedule set
13 forth in Exhibits "A, B, C, E, F, G, H, I, & J". In the event that
14 the projects are not substantially completed by the time set forth in
15 the completion schedule due to unforeseen or uncontrollable causes,
16 the schedule for the completion of the projects may be extended by the
17 period of the enforced delay. Times of performance may also be
18 extended in writing by the mutual agreement of CITY and COUNTY. If
19 substantial progress toward completion in conformance with the
20 completion schedule, as determined by COUNTY of the projects are not
21 made during the term of the Supplemental Agreement, COUNTY may suspend
22 or terminate this agreement by the procedures set forth in the Section
23 titled "Termination", of this agreement and the entitlement funds
24 associated with the projects may be reprogrammed by COUNTY after
25 appropriate notice is given.
26 4. DISPOSITION OF FUNDS. COUNTY's Board of Supervisors shal~
27 determine the final disposition and distribution of all funds received
28 by COUNTY under the Act consistent with the provisions of Paragraphs
2
1 2 and 3 of this Agreement. COUNTY, through its Economic Development
2 Agency, shall: (1) make payment of the grant funds to CITY as
3 designated in Exhibits "A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, & J", and (2)
4 monitor the projects activity to ensure compliance with applicable
5 federal regulations and the terms of this Agreement. CITY shall
6 comply with timely drawdown of funds by submitting monthly requests
7 for reimbursement. All disbursements of grant funds will be on a
8 reimbursement basis and made within thirty (30) days after the CITY
9 has submitted its letter identifying payments and documentation which
10 supports expenditures. All authorized obligations incurred in the
11 performance of the Agreement must be reported by June 1, 1997 for
12 projects eligible under 570.201(e), Public Services.
13 5. COOPERATION WITH HOUSING ACTIVITIES. CITY shall cooperate
14 with COUNTY in undertaking essential community development and housing
15 assistance activities, specifically urban renewal and public
16 assistance housing, and shall assist COUNTY in carrying out its
17 Strategic Plan of the Consolidated Plan and other requirements of the
18 Community Development Block Grant Program.
19 6. LEAD AGENCY FOR COMP!.IANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA
20 ENVIRONMENTAL OUALITY ACT (CEOA). Pursuant to ~Section 15051(d) of
21 Title 14 of the California Administrative Code, CITY is designated as
22 the lead agency for the projects that are the subject matter of this
23 Agreement.
24 7. HOT.D HARMLESS AND INDEMNIFICATION. CITY shall comply with
25 all applicable laws, rules and regulations, .and shall indemnify, save
26 and hold harmless COUNTY and its agency members and their respective
27 agents, servants and employees of and from any and all liabilities,
28 claims, debt, damages, demands, suits, actions and causes of action
1 of whatsoever kind, nature or sort including, but not by way
2 limitation, wrongful death, expenses of the defense of said parties,
3 and the payment of attorney's fees, arising out of or in any manner
4 connected with the performance by CITY under this Agreement.
5 8. RRCORDS AND INSPECTIONS.
6 a. CITY shall establish and maintain records in
7 accordance with 24 CFR Part 570 and Part 85 and OMB Circular A-87 as
8 applicable and as they relate to the acceptance and use of federal
9 funds under this Agreement.
10 b. -CITY shall maintain a separate account for CDBG
11 Entitlement funds received as set forth in Exhibits "A, B, C, D, E,
12 F, G, H, I & J".
13 c. CITY shall, during the normal business hours, make
14 available to COUNTY and to the Department of Housing and Urban
15 Development for examination and copying all of its records and other
16 materials with respect to matters covered by this Agreement.
17 d. CITY shall retain all program income as defined in
18 Section 570.500 of Title 24 of the Federal Code of Regulations. Said
19 program income shall be used only for the activity that is the subject
20 of this Agreement. Further, all provisions of this Agreement shall
21 apply to such activity.
22 e. The CITY shall ensure projects that are serving
23 limited clientele (570.208(a) (2) (i), that at least fifty-one percent
24 (51%) of the persons benefitting from the CDBG funded activities are
25 of low and moderate income and meet the program income guidelines
26_ attached as Exhibit IG. The CITY must provide the direct benefi'
27 documentation required.
28 9. FEDERAL REOUIREMENTS. CITY shall comply with the
4
1 provisions of the Act and any amendments thereto and the federal
2 regulations and guidelines now or hereafter enacted pursuant to the
3 Act. More particularly, CITY is to comply with those regulations
4 found in Part 85 and Part 570 of Title 24 of the Code of Federal
5 Regulations. CITY is to comply with OMB Circular A-87, or any
6 subsequent replacement. CITY is to abide by the provisions of the
7 Community Development Block Grant Manual, prepared by COUNTY and cited
8 in the above-mentioned Cooperation Agreement.
9 10. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. CITY and its agents, servants
10 and employees shall act at all times in an independent capacity during
11 the term of this Agreement, and shall not act as, shall not be, nor
12 shall they in any manner be construed to be agents, officers or
13 employees of the COUNTY.
14 11. TERMINATION.
15 a. 'CITY. CITY may not terminate this Agreement
16 except upon express written consent of COUNTY.
17 b.. COUNTY. Notwithstanding the provisions of Paragraph
18 11a, COUNTY may suspend or terminate this Agreement upon written
19 notice to CITY of action being taken and the reason for such action:
20 (1) In the event CITY fails to perform the
21 covenants herein contained at such times and in such manner as
22 provided in this Agreement; and
23 (2) In the event there is a conflict with any
24 federal, state or local law, ordinance, regulation or rule rendering
25 any of the provisions of this Agreement invalid or untenable; or
26 (3) In the event the funding from the Department
27 of Housing and Urban Development referred to in Paragraphs 1 and 2
28 above is terminated or otherwise becomes unavailable.
1 ¢. Upon suspension of this Agreement, CITY agrees t¢
2 return any unencumbered funds which it has been provided by COUNTY.
3 In accepting said funds, COUNTY does not waive any claim or cause of
4 action it may have against CITY for breach of this Agreement.
5 d. Upon suspension of this Agreement, CITY agrees not
6 to incur any additional cost with regard to the projects that are
7 cited in the written notice as necessitating the suspensions.
8 12. NONDISCRIMINATION. CITY shall abide by Sections 570.601
9 and 570.602 of Title 24 of the Federal Code of Regulations which
10 requires that no person in the United States shall on the grounds of
11 race, color, national origin, or sex, be excluded from participation
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under
any program or activity funded in whole or in
part with Community Development funds.
PROHIBITION AGAINST CONFI.ICTS OF INTEREST
a. CITY and its assigns, employees, agents, consultants,
officers and elected and appointed officials shall become familiar
with and shall comply with the CDBG.regulations prohibiting conflicts
of interest contained in 24 CFR 570.611, attached hereto as Exhibit
"CI" and by this reference incorporated herein.
b. CITY and its assigns, employees, agents, consultants,
officers, and elected. and appointed officials shall become familiar
with and shall comply with Section A-11 of the County's CDBG Policy
manual, attached hereto as Exhibit "CI" and by this reference
incorporated herein.
c. CITY understands and agrees that no waiver o~
exception can be granted to the prohibition against conflict of
interest except upon written approval of HUD pursuant to 24 CFR
1 570.611 (d). Any request by CITY for an exception shall first be
2 reviewed by COUNTY to determine whether such request is appropriate
3 for submission to HUD. In determining whether such request is
4 appropriate for submission to HUD, COUNTY will consider the factors
5 listed in 24 CFR 570.611 (e).
6 d. Prior to any funding under this Agreement, CITY shall
7 provide COUNTY with a list of all employees, agents, consultants,
8 officers and elected and appointed officials who are in a position to
9 participate in a decision making process, exercise any functions or
10 responsibilities, or gain inside information with respect to the CDBG
11 activities funded under this Agreement. CITY shall also promptly
12 disclose to COUNTY any potential conflict, including even the
13 appearance of conflict, that may arise with respect to the CDBG
14 activities funded under this Agreement.
15 e. Any violation of this section shall be deemed a
16 material breach of this Agreement, and the Agreement shall be
17 immediately terminated by the COUNTY.
18 14. PROJECT ELIGIBILITY. As to CITY or its claimants, COUNTY
19 shall bear no liability for any later determination by the United
20 States Government, the Department of Housing and Urban Development or
21 any other person or entity that CITY is or is not eligible under 24
22 CFR Part 570 to receive CDBG funds.
23 15. USR OF PROPERTY. Whenever CDBG federal or program income
24 are used, in whole or in part, for the purchase of equipment or
25 personal property, the property shall not be transferred for a period
26 of five (5) years from the date of purchase or completion of
27 construction without COUNTY approval. The CITY shall maintain an
281 inventory for COUNTY review.
1 16. E~PT.OYMENT OPPORTUNITIES TO BE CAUSED BY PROJECT. CIT~
2 agrees to notify and to require any lessee or assignee to notify
3 Riverside County JTPD (Jobs Training Partnerships Department) and GAIN
4 - Department of Public Social Services of any and all job openings
5 that are caused by this project.
6 17. PUBLICITY. Any publicity generated by CITY for the
7 projects funded pursuant to this Agreement, during the term of this
8 Agreement, will make reference to the Contribution of the County of
9 Riverside Community Development Block Grant Program in making the
10 project possible.
11 18. PROGRAM MONITORING AND EVA!.UATION. CITY shall be
12 monitored and evaluated in terms of its effectiveness and timely
13 compliance with the provisions of this Agreement and the effective and
14 efficient achievement of the Program Objectives. Quarterly reports
15 shall be due on the last day of the month immediately following the
16 end of the quarter being reported. The quarterly written reports
17 shall include, but shall not be limited to the following data
18 elements:
19 a. Title of program, listing of componenets, description
20 of activities/operations.
21 b. The projected goals, indicated numerically, and also
22 the goals achieved (for each report period). In addition, identify
23 by percentage and description, the progress achieved towards meeting
24 the specified goals; additionally, identify any problems encountered
25 in meeting goals.
26 c. Beneficiaries
27 Provide the following:
28 1) Total number of direct beneficiaries
1 2) Percent of total number of direct beneficiaries
2 who are:
3 · Low and moderate income
4 · Low income
5 · Black, not Hispanic origin
6 · White, not Hispanic origin
7 · Hispanic
8 · American Indian/Alaskan Native
9 · Asian or Pacific Islander
10 · Female Headed Households
11 19. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. It is expressly agreed that this
12 Agreement together with the cooperation Agreement between the parties,
13 embodies the entire agreement of the parties in relation to the
14 subject matter thereof, and that no other Agreement or understanding,
15 verbal or otherwise, relative to this subject matter, exists between
16 the parties at the time of execution.
17 20. MINISTERIAL ACTS. The Executive Director of the COUNTY's
18 Economic Development Agency or his or her designee(s) are authorized
19 to take such ministerial actions as may be necessary or appropriate
20 to implement the terms, provisions, and conditions of this Agreement
211 as it may be amended from time to time by COUNTY.
22 //
23 //
24 //
25 //
26 //
27 //
28 //
9
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
21.
modified or amended only by a writing signed by the duly
authorized and empowered representative of COUNTY
respectively.
DATED:
MODIFICATION OF AGREEMENT. This Agreement may be
and CITY
ATTEST:
GERALD A. MALONEY
Clerk of the Board
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
By:
Chairman, Board of Supervisors
By:
Deputy
(Seal)
DATED:
ATTEST:
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Mayor
SW:AA:ri
F:\USERS\CDBG\1S~TM\SUPAGR97.037
10
.IBIT A
r~ge 1
SUPPT.EMENTAL AGREEMENT
FILE: 1.TM037
Cooperative Agency: City of Temecula
Address: 26442 Beckman Court,Temecula0 CA 92590
Project Title: Temecula Community Center Acquisition
Location: 28816 Pujo] Street, Temecula, CA 92590
Description:
City of Temecula purposes to use CDBG funds to make final payment on the newly
acquired building and adjacent property. The building and property is being used
as a community center and neighborhood park providng recreation and human services
in the Old Town Temecula area providing recreation and human services. This is
the second year of a two (2) year project, using two (2) consecutive CDBG funding
cycles.
Project Budget:
Cost CDBG Approved
1) Architect/Engineer Design Costs $
2) Administration Costs
3) Planning Costs
4) Acquisition Costs
5) Construction Costs
6) Relocation Costs
7) Equipment Costs
8) Other Costs
9) Operation/Maintenance
10) Contingency
TOTAL $
211,000
$ 211,000
EXHIBIT A
Page 2
Timetable Implementation Schedule
Milestone
Begin Project
Semi-Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Site Visit
Start Date
07/1/97
12/97
7/97
FILE: 1.~
Completion Date
6/30/98
12/97
6/98
'IBIT A
~e 3
FILE: 1.TM037
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
ANNUAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
FROM
PROJECT SUMMARY
PERIOD OF APPLICABILITY
TO
July 1, 1997
June 30, 1998
1. NAME OF APPLICANT
County of Riverside
2. APPLICATION/GRANT NUMBER
B-97-UC-06-0506
Original (each year)
Revision, Date
Amendment, Date
5. NAME OF PROJECT
Temecula Community Center
Acquisition
6. PROJECT NUMBER
1.TM037
7. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW STATUS
Exempt
8. ENTITY WITH RESPONSIBILITY FOR CARRYING OUT THE PROJECT
City of Temecula
9. TELEPHONE NUMBER
(909) 694-6480
10. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: City of Temecula purposes to use CDBG funds to make
final payment on the newly acquired building and adjacent property. The building
and property is being used as a community center and neighborhood park providng
recreation and human services in the Old Town Temecula area providing recreation
and human services. This is the second-year of a two' (2) year project, using two
(2) consecutive CDBG funding cycles.
GIBILITY: 570.201(a)
BENEFIT: 570.208(a) (1) (i)
11. CENSUS TRACT(S)/ENUMERATION DISTRICT(S)
432.05 (low/mod target area survey)
12. ANTICIPATED ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
Acquisition of building and adjacent property to be used as a community
center and neighborhood park.
13. CDBG COMPONENT ACTIVITIES PROGRAM YEAR FUNDS(in thousands of $)
(List component activities using names CDBG OTHER
of activities shown in Part A, COST Low/Mod Other Amount Source
SUMMARY, Form HUD-7067.) Benefit Benefit
(a) (b) (c) (d) (e)
$ S $
Acquisition
211.000
Totals $ 211,000 $ $
15. Total Costs To Be Paid With Community Development Grant Funds
(Sum of Columns b and c) $ 211.000
EXHIBIT B
Page 1
SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT
FILE
Cooperative Agency: City of Temecula
Address: 28816 Pujol St.,Temecula, CA 92590
Project Title: Temecula Recreation and Human Services
Location: 28816 Pujol Street. Temecula, CA 92590
Description:
CDBG funds will be used to off-set the community center's staff cost associated
with the coordination and implementation of recreation and human services programs
in the community of Old Town Temecula. Additional operation costs include:
supplies, utilities and equipment. Programs that will be provided are:
recreational and cultural activities, social/human services such as: medical,
legal assistance and parenting classes.
Project Budget:
Cost CDBG Approved
1) Architect/Engineer Design Costs $
2) Administration Costs
3) Planning Costs
4) Acquisition Costs
5) Construction Costs
6) Relocation Costs
7) Equipment Costs
8) Other Costs
9) Operation/Maintenance
10) Contingency
TOTAL $
15,500
$ 15.500
~IBIT B
Fage 2
FILE: 1.TM038
Timetable Implementation Schedule
Milestone
Start Date
Completion Date
Begin Project
Monthly Grantee Status Report
Semi-Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Site Visit
07/1/97
7/97
12/97
7/97
6/30/98
6/30/98
1/98
6/98
EXHIBIT B
Page 3
FILE: 1.TM
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
ANNUAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
FROM
PROJECT SUMMARY
PERIOD OF APPLICABILITY
TO
July 1, 1997
June 30, 1998
1. NAME OF APPLICANT
County of Riverside
2. APPLICATION/GRANT NUMBER
B-97-UC-06-0506
4 o
X Original (each year)
Revision, Date
__Amendment, Date
5. NAME OF PROJECT
Temecula Recreation and
Human Services
6. PROJECT NUMBER
1.TM038
7. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW STATUS
Exempt
8. ENTITY WITH RESPONSIBILITY FOR CARRYING OUT THE PROJECT 9. TELEPHONE NUMBER
City of Temecula (909) 694-6480
10. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: CDBG funds will be used to off-set the community
center's staff cost associated with the coordination and implementation of
recreation and human services programs in the community of Old Town Temecula.
Additional operation costs include: supplies, utilities and equipment. Programs
that will be provided are: recreational and cultural activities, social/human
services such as: medical, legal assistance and parenting classes.
ELIGIBILITY: 570.201(e)
BENEFIT: 570.208(a) (1) (i)
11. CENSUS TRACT(S)/ENUMERATION DISTRICT(S)
432.05 (low/mod target area survey)
12. ANTICIPATED ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
Provide recreational and cultural activities to approximately 2,000
individuals.
13. CDBG COMPONENT ACTIVITIES PROGRAM YEAR FUNDS(in thousands of $)
(List component activities using names CDBG OTHER
of activities shown in Part A, COST Low/Mod Other Amount Source
SUMMARY. Form HUD-7067.) Benefit Benefit
(a) (b) (c) (d) (e)
$ $
Public Service
15,500
14. Totals $ 15,500 $ $
15. Total Costs To Be Paid With Community Development Grant Funds
(Sum of Columns b and c) $ 15,500
qIBIT C
~e 1
FILE: 1.TM039
SUPPLEMENTAT. AGREEMENT
Cooperative Agency:
Murrieta Valley Unified School Dist. Parent Center
Address:
245!5 Lincoln Avenue,Murrieta, CA 92562
Project Title:
Valley Family Support, Health, and Recreation Serv.
Location:
Temecula Valley
Description:
The Parent Center/MVUSD plan to use CDBG funds to offset the cost associated with
the purchase or construct a multi-use facility that can be shared with various
non-profit agencies. Agencies that are collaborating on the multi use facility
have a common goal to provide services to low/mod income individuals. Services
that will be provided are child care, health, recreational, substance abuse, youth
and alternative to domestic violence services.
Project Budget:
Cost
1) Architect/Engineer Design Costs
2) Administration Costs
3) Planning Costs
4) Acquisition Costs
5) Construction Costs
6) Relocation Costs
7) Equipment Costs
8) Other Costs
9) Operation/Maintenance
10) Contingency
$ o
CDBG Approved
13,304
TOTAL $ $ 13.304
EXHIBIT C
Page 2
FILE: 1.T
Timetable Implementation Schedule
M~lestone
Begin Project
Monthly Grantee Status Report
Semi-Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Site Visit
Start Date
7/97
7/97
1/98
12/97
Completion Date
6/30/98
6/30/98
2/98
6/98
-"qIBIT C FILE: 1.TM039
e3
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
ANNUAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
PROJECT SUMMARY
PERIOD OF APPLICABILITY
FROM TO 4.
July 1. 1997
June 30. 1998
1. NAME OF APPLICANT
County of Riverside
2. APPLICATION/GRANT NUMBER
B-97-UC-06-0506
~ Original (each year)
__Revision, Date
__Amendment, Date
5. NAME OF PROJECT 6. PROJECT NUMBER
Valley Family Support, Health, 1.TM039
and Recreation Serv.
7. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW STATUS
Exempt
8. ENTITY WITH RESPONSIBILITY FOR CARRYING OUT THE PROJECT 9. TELEPHONE NUMBER
Murrieta Valley Unified School Dist. Parent Center (909) 696-1588
10. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The Parent Center/MVUSD plan to use CDBG .funds to
offset the cost associated with the purchase or construct a multi-use facility
that can be shared with various non-profit agencies. Agencies that are
collaborating on the multi use facility have a common goal to provide services to
low/mod income individuals. Services that will be provided are child care,
health, recreational, substance abuse, youth and alternative to domestic violence
services.
GIBILITY: 570.201(a)
BENEFIT: 570.208(a) (2) (i) (B)
11. CENSUS TRACT(S)/ENUMERATION DISTRICT(S)
Limited Clientele
12. ANTICIPATED ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
Acquisition of building or built a multi-use facility to be shared with
various non-profit agencies.
13. CDBG COMPONENT ACTIVITIES PROGRAM YEAR FUNDS(in thousands of $)
(List component activities using names CDBG OTHER
of activities shown in Part A, COST Low/Mod Other Amount Source
SUMMARY, Form HUD-7067.) Benefit Benefit
(a) (b) (c) (d) (e)
$ $ $
Acquisition
13,304
Totals $ 13,304 $ $
15. Total Costs To Be Paid With Community Development Grant Funds
(Sum of Columns b and c) $ 13,304
EXHIBIT D
Page 1
SUPPT,FMRNTA!, AGRFRMRNT
FILE: 1.TF- ~
Cooperative Agency: Temecula Senior Center - City of Temecula
Address: 40250 Winchester Road. Temecula, CA 92586
Project Title: Emergency Food & Aide
Location: 40250 Winchester Road, Temecula
Description:
The senior center provides an emergency food program for 5,000 individuals that
may be homeless, elderly, handicapped and for migrant farm workers. CDBG funds
will be used to purchase food and supplies, also operational cost, salaries,
travels, telephone and utilities.
Project Budget:
Cost CDBG Approved
1) Architect/Engineer Design Costs $
2) Administration Costs
3) Planning Costs
4) Acquisition Costs
5) Construction Costs
6) Relocation Costs
7) Equipment Costs
8) Other Costs
9) Operation/Maintenance
10) Contingency
TOTAL $
10.000
$ 10,000
-"HIBIT D
~e 2
Timetable Implementation Schedule
Milestone
Begin Project
Monthly Grantee Status Report
Semi-Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Site Visit
Start Date
7/97
7/97
12/97
12/97
FILE: 1. TM043
Completion Date
6/30/98
6/30/98
2/98
6/98
EXHIBIT D
Page 3
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
ANNUAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
FROM
PROJECT SUMMARY
PERIOD OF APPLICABILITY
TO
July 1, 1997
5. NAME OF PROJECT
Emergency Food & Aide
June 30, 1998
6. PROJECT NUMBER
1.TM043
FILE: 1.TMc
1. NAME OF APPLICANT
County of Riverside
2. APPLICATION/GRANT NUMBER
B-97-UC-06-0506
X Original (each year)
__Revision, Date
Amendment, Date
7. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW STATUS
Exempt
8. ENTITY WITH RESPONSIBILITY FOR CARRYING OUT THE PROJECT 9. TELEPHONE NUMBER
Temecula Senior Center - City of Temecula (909) 676-5155
10. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The senior center provides an emergency food program
for 5,000 individuals that may be homeless, elderly, handicapped and for migrant
farm workers. CDBG funds will be used to purchase food and supplies, also
operational cost, salaries, travels, telephone and utilities.
ELIGIBILITY: 570.201(e)
BENEFIT: 570.208(a) (2) (i) (A)
11. CENSUS TRACT(S)/ENUMERATION DISTRICT(S)
Limited Clientele
12. ANTICIPATED ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
Provide an emergency food program for 5,000 individuals.
13. CDBG COMPONENT ACTIVITIES PROGRAM YEAR FUNDS(in thousands of $)
(List component activities using names CDBG OTHER
of activities shown in Part A, COST Low/Mod Other Amount Source
SUMMARY, Form HUD-7067.) Benefit Benefit
(a) (b) (c) (d) (e)
$ $ $
Publis Service
10,000
14. Totals $ 10.000 $ $
15. Total Costs To Be Paid With Community Development Grant Funds
(Sum of Columns b and c) $ 10.000
~"~IBIT E FILE: 0.217
e 1
SUPPT,FMENTA!, AGREEMENT
Assistance T.eague of Temecula Valley-City of Lake Flsinore
1) Architect/Engineer Design Costs $
2) Administration Costs
3) Planning Costs
4) Acquisition Costs
5) Construction Costs
6) Relocation Costs
7) Equipment Costs
8) Other Costs
9) Operation/Maintenance
10) Contingency
TOTAL $
~s project has been funded by:
Cost
CDBG Approved
S
10,000
$ 10,000
City of Lake Elsinore
City of Murrieta
City of Temecula
Total
$ 2,000
5,000
10,000
$17,000
Cooperative Agency:
Address: 27464 Commerce Center Dr., Ste. K,Temecula, CA 92590
Project Title: Operation School Bell
Location: 27464 Commerce Center Drive, Suite K, Temecula, CA 92590
Description:
Operation School Bell will provide new clothing and school supplies for
approximately 700 school age children of the cities of Temecula, Murrieta and Lake
Elsinore, and the Temecula School District. The clothing provided consists of
shoes, 3 pairs of socks and underclothing, jeans, slacks or skirts, sweatshirt,
and jacket.
This project is being administered by the Riverside County Economic Development
Agency on behalf of the Cities of Lake Elsinore, Murrieta, and Temecula.
'ject Budget:
EXHIBIT F
Page 1
FILE: 0.218
SUPPT.EMENTAI. AGREEMENT
Cooperative Agency:
Roys & Girls Club of Temecula -City of Murrieta
Address:
28790 Pujol St.,Temecula, CA 92590
Project Title:
Boys & Girls Club of Temecula
Location:
28790 Pujol St., Temecula. CA 92590 - City of Murrieta
Description:
Funds will be used to provide child care services through the off-track and Am/Pm
program, Monday through Friday. The program will run year round, providing child
care for 550 school age children from 1st grade through 8th grade. These children
are from low/moderate income families, 30% from 1st district unincorporated area
and 70% between the cities of Temecula and Murrieta.
This project is being administered by the Riverside County Economic Development
Agency on behalf of the First District, Cities of Murrieta and Temecula.
Project Budget:
1) Architect/Engineer Design Costs $
2) Administration Costs
3) Planning Costs
4) Acquisition Costs
5) Construction Costs
6) Relocation Costs
7) Equipment Costs
8) Other Costs
9) Operation/Maintenance
10) Contingency
TOTAL $
This project has been funded by:
Cost
CDBG Approved
$
10,000
First District
City of Murrieta
City of Temecula
Total
$ 10.000
$14,000
22,776
10.000
$46,776
FVHIBIT G FILE: 0.225
e 1
SUPP!,EMENTAL AGREEMENT
Cooperative Agency: V.I.P. Tots
Address: 41915 East Acacia St,Hemet. CA 92544
Project Title: V.!.P. Tots
Location: 41915 E Acacia St. Hemet, CA
Description:
V.I.P. Tots will use CDBG funds to expand and enhance the provision of educational
services for 80 children with various disabilities. Specifically, funds will be
used to purchase new computer technology specially designed for children with
developmental, physical disabilities and visual/hearing impairment.
This project is being administered by the Riverside County Economic Development
Agency on behalf of the Third District and City of.Temecula.
Project Budget:
_j Architect/Engineer Design Costs
2) Administration Costs
3) Planning Costs
4) Acquisition Costs
5) Construction Costs
6) Relocation Costs
7) Equipment Costs
8) Other Costs
9) Operation/Maintenance
10) Contingency
TOTAL
Cost
CDBG Approved
S
1,000
$ 1,000
This project has been funded by:
Third District
City of Temecula
Total
$ 1,000
1,000
$ 2,000
EXHIBIT H
Page 1
SUPPT,EMENTAT, AGREEMENT
FILE: 0.228
Cooperative Agency: Operation SafeHouse, Inc.
Address: 9685 Hayes Street,Riverside, CA 92503
Project Title: Operation SafeHouse, Emergency Service Transition
Location: 9685 Hayes Street, City of Riverside
Description:
The program is projecting to serve approximately 650 youth in FY 97/98. CDBG
funds will be used to off-set the operation and maintenance cost (salaries, rent,
telephone, and supplies) of the shelter in order to provide additional safe
shelter, food, clothing, and counseling.
This project is being administered by the Riverside County Economic Development
Agency on behalf of the Third District, Fifth District and City of Temecula.
Project Budget:
1) Architect/Engineer Design Costs $
2) Administration Costs
3) Planning Costs
4) Acquisition Costs
5) Construction Costs
6) Relocation Costs
7) Equipment Costs
8) Other Costs
9) Operation/Maintenance
10) Contingency
TOTAL $
This project has been funded by:
Cost
CDBG Approved
$
5OO
Third District
Fifth District
City of Temecula
Total
$ 500
$ 2,500
5,000
5O0
$ 8,000
EXHIBIT I
Page 1
SUPPT.~MENTAT. AGREEMENT
FILE: 0.233
Cooperative Agency: Alternatives to Domestic Violence
Address: PO Box 910,Riverside. CA 92502
Project Title: Domestic Violence Services
Location: Western Riverside County
Description:
ADV provides victims of domestic violence with an outreach support program. CDBG
funds will be used for costs that include salaries/benefits and operating expenses
(telephone, rent, etc.) This funding will allow ADV to continue and expand
current services such as transitional housing services, crisis intervention
counseling, emergency shelter, and advocacy services, throughout Riverside County.
This project is being administered by the Riverside County Economic Development
Agency on behalf.of the First, Second, Third and Fith Districts, Cities of Banning,
Beaumont, San Jacinto and Temecula.
Project Budget:
· Architect/Engineer Design Costs $
2) Administration Costs
3) Planning Costs
4) Acquisition Costs
5) Construction Costs
6) Relocation Costs
7) Equipment Costs
8) Other Costs
9) Operation/Maintenance
10) Contingency
TOTAL $
This project has been funded by:
Cost
CDBG Approved
$
1. 000
First District
Second District
Third District
Fifth District
City of Banning
City of Beaumont
City of San Jacinto
City of Temecula
Total
$ 1,000
$15,000
15 000
10 000
28 250
3 000
5 000
3 000
10000
$ 80,250
EXHIBIT J
Page 1
FILE: 1.__6
SUPPT.F. MENTAL AGREEMENT
Cooperative Agency: Parent Center - Murrieta Valley Unified School District
Address: 24515 Lincoln Ave,Murrieta, CA 92562
Project Title: Parent Center
Location: 24515 !.incoln Ave.. Murrieta. CA 92562
Description:
The program will provide parents with parenting, English as a second language, GED
and math classes. In addition, workshops on parenting issues relating to youth
and drugs, alcohol abuse, gang participation, homework strategies and child
development. Funds will be used for salaries, supplies and training.
This project is being administered by the Riverside County Economic Development
Agency on behalf of the First District and City of Temecula.
Project Budget:
1) Architect/Engineer Design Costs $
2) Administration Costs
3) Planning Costs
4) Acquisition Costs
5) Construction Costs
6) Relocation Costs
7) Equipment Costs
8) Other Costs
9) Operation/Maintenance
10) Contingency
TOTAL $
This project has been funded by:
Cost
First District
City of Temecula
Total
CDBG Approved
1.000
$ 1,000
$10,000
1,000
$11,000
Prohibition Against Conflicts of Interest
EXHIBIT CI , page 1 of 4
§ 570.611 Conflict of interest.
(a)
(1)
App]icability.
In the procurement of supplies, equipment, construction, and services by
recipients, and by subrecipients (including those specified at
§ 570.204(c)), the conflict of interest provisions in 24 CFR 85.36 and
OMB circular A 110, respectively, shall apply.
(2)
In all cases not governed by 24 CFR 85.36 and OMB Circular A-110, the
provisions of this section shall apply. Such cases include the
acquisition and disposition of real property and the provision of
assistance by the recipient, by its subrecipients, or to individuals,
businesses and other private entities under eligible activities which
authorize such assistance (e.g., rehabilitation, preservation, and other
improvements of private properties or facilities pursuant to
§ 570.202, or grants, loans and other assistance to businesses,
individuals and other private entities pursuant to § 570.203, § 570.204
or § 570.455).
Conflicts prohibited. Except for the. use of CDBG funds to pay salaries
a~d other related administrative or personnel costs, the general rule is that no
persons described in paragraph (c) of this section who exercise or have exercised
any functions or responsibilities with respect to CDBG activities assisted under
this part or who are in a position to participate in a decision making process or
gain inside information with regard to such activities, may obtain a personal or
financial interest or benefit from a CDBG assisted activity, or have an interest
in any contract, subcontract or agreement with respect thereto, or the proceeds
thereunder, either for themselves or those with whom they have family or business
ties, during their tenure or for one year thereafter. For the UDAG program, the
above restrictions shall apply to all activities that are a part of the UDAG
project, and shall cover any such interest or benefit during, or at any time
after, such person's tenure.
(c) Persons covered. The conflict of interest provisions of paragraph (b) of
this section apply to any person who is an employee, agent, consultant, officer,
or elected official or appointed official of the recipient, or of any designated
public agencies, or subrecipients which are receiving funds under this part.
(d) Exceptions: threshold requirements. Upon the written request of the
recipient, HUD may grant an exception to the provisions of paragraph (b) of this
section on a case-by-case basis when it determines that such an exception will
serve to further the purposes of the Act and the effective and efficient
administration of the recipient's program or project. An exception may be
~onsidered only after the recipient has provided the following:
(1)
A disclosure of the nature of the conflict, accompanied by an assurance
that there has been public disclosure of the conflict and a description
of how the public disclosure was made; and
Prohibition Against Conflicts of Int
EXHIBIT CI, page 2 of 4
(2)
(e)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
An opinion of the recipient's attorney that the interest for which the
exception is sought would not Violate State or local law.
Factors to be considered for exceptions. In determining whether to grant
a requested exception after the recipient has satisfactorily met the
requirements of paragraph (d) of this section, HUD shall consider the
cumulative effect of the following factors, where applicable:
Whether the exception would provide a significant cost benefit or an
essential degree of expertise to the program or project which would
otherwise not be available;
Whether an opportunity was provided for .open competitive bidding or
negotiation;
Whether the person affected is a member of a group or class of low or
moderate income persons intended to be the beneficiaries of the ass: ed
activity, and the exception will permit such person to receive gene
the same interests or benefits as are being made available or provideu to
the group or class;
Whether the affected person has withdrawn from his or her functions or
responsibilities, or the decision making process with respect to the
specific assisted activity in question;
Whether the interest or benefit was present before the affected person
was in a position as described in paragraph (b) of this section;
Whether undue hardship will result either to the recipient or the person
affected when weighed against the public interest served by avoiding the
prohibited conflict; and
(7) Any other relevant considerations.
Prohibition Against Conflicts of Interest
Rxhibit CT, page 3 of 4
Community Dvlpmt.
Block Grant
Policy Manual
I.D. # A-11
(pg. 1 of 2)
TOPIC:
CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODED
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGENCY
DATE: October 1989
This Conflict of Interest Code is written to comply with Federal Regulations (24
CFR Part 85). These Regulations. "Administrative Requirements for Grants and
Cooperative Agreements to State, Local and Federally Recognized Indian Tribal
Governments" require that grantees and sub-grantees will maintain.a written code
of standards of conduct governing the performance of their employees engaged in
the award and administration of contracts.
No employee, officer or agent of the grantee shall participate in the
b=±ection, in the award or in the administration of a contract supported by
Federal Funds if a conflict of interest, real or apparent, would be involved.
2) Such a conflict will arise when:
i) The employee, officer or agent;
ii) Any member of the immediate family;
iii) His/Her partners, or;
iv)
An organization which employs, or is about to employ any of the above
has a financial or other interest in the firm's selection for award.
3) The grantee's or sub-grantee's officers, employees or agents will neither
solicit nor accept gratuities, favors or anything of monetary value from
contractors or parties to sub-agreements except as noted in Section 4.
4) A grantee's or sub-grantee's officers, employees or agents will be presumed
to have a financial interest in a business if their financial interest exceeds the
following:
i)
Any business entity in which the official has a direct or indirect
investment worth one thousand dollars ($1,000) or more.
±i)
Any real property in which the official has a direct or indirect interest
worth one thousand dollars ($1,000) or more.
Prohibition Against Conflicts of Interest
Exhibit CI, page 4 of 4
TOPIC:
DATE:
iii)
iv)
v)
5)
Community Dvlpmt.
Block Grant
Policy Manual
I.D. # A-11
(pg. 2 of 2)
CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGENCY
October 1989
Any source of income, other than gifts and other than loans by a
commercial lending institution in the regular course of business on terms
available to the public without regard to official status, aggregating two
hundred fifty dollars ($250) or more in value provided to, received by or
promised to the official within 12 months prior to the time when the
decision is made.
Any business entity in which the official is a director, officer, partner,
trustee, employee, or holds any position of management.
Any donor of, or any intermediary or agent for a donor of, a gift or o~fts
aggregating two hundred fifty dollars ($250) or more in value provid, o,
received by, or promised to the official within 12 months prior t
time when the decision is made.
For purposes of Section 4, indirect investment or interest means an5
investment or interest owned by the spouse or dependent child of ar
official, by an agent on behalf of an official, or by a business entity o2
trust in which the official, the official's agents, spouse, and dependen~
children own directly, indirectly, or beneficially a 10-percent interes~
or more.
ITEM 18
ORDINANCE NO. f~'/-10
AN ORDINANCE OF ~ CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECUI.,A, CALIFORNIA APPROVING AN AMENDMENT AND
RESTATEMENT OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. $ BETWEEN
THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND BRAMALEA CALIFORNIA, LLC
FOR TM 23100, 23101, 23103 AND TIM 28503, WITHIN SPF_,C]FIC
PLAN NO. 199 (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0030)
WItEREAS, Section 65864 et li:tl. of the Government Code of the State of California
and Temecula City Resolution No. 91-52 authorize the execution of agreements establishing
and maintaining requirements applicable m the development of real property; and,
WITEREAS, in accordance with the procedure specified in said Resolution, Bramalea
California, LLC has filed with the City of Temecula an application for a Development
Agreement which reflects an amendment and restatement of existing County Development
Agreement No. 5 (hereinafter "this Agreement"), of a residential housing subdivision on its
property for Tracts 23100, 23101, 23103 and 28503 (305 lots), hereinafter the "Subject
Property" which application has been reviewed and accepted for filing by the Community
Development Director; and,
WHEREAS, notice of the City's intention to consider adoption of this Agreement with
Bramalea California, LLC has been duly given in the form and manner required by law, and
the Planning Commission and City Council of said City have each conducted public hearings
on April 21, 1997 and May 5, 1997 (Planning Commission), and May 27, 1997 (City Council)
at which time it heard and considered all evidence relevant and material to said subject.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMEC~ DOES ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. FINDINGS. The City Council hereby finds and determines, with
respect to this Agreement by and between the City of Temecula and Bramalea California, LLC
that it:
A. Is consistent with the objectives, policies, general land uses, and programs
specified in the City of Temecula's General Plan in that this Agreement makes reasonable
provision for the use of certain real property for residential development consistent with the
General Plan's land use designation of Low-Medium Density Residential;
B. Is compatible with the uses authorized in, and the regulations prescribed for, the
land use district in which the Subject Property referred to herein is located as this Agreement
provides for residential development pursuant to a Specific Plan;
C. Is in conformity with the public convenience, general welfare, and good land
use practice because it makes reasonable provision for a balance of land uses compatible with
the remainder of the City;
D. Will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare because it
provides adequate assurances for the protection thereof;
E. Notice of the public hearing before the Planning Commission was published in a
newspaper of general circulation at least ten (10) days before the Planning Commission public
hearing, and mailed or delivered at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing to the project
applicant and to each agency expected to provide water, sewer, schools, police protection, and
fire protection, and to all property owners within six hundred feet (600') of the property as
shown on the latest equalized assessment roll;
F. Notice of the public hearing before the Planning Commission included the date,
time, and place of the public hearing, the identity of the heating body, a general explanation of
the matter to be considered, a general description in text or diagram of the location of the real
property that is the subject of the hearing, and of the need to exhaust administrative remedies;
G. Notice of the public heating before the City Council was published in a
newspaper of general circulation at least ten (10) days prior to the City Council public hearing,
mailed at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing to the project applicant, to each agency
expected to provide water, sewer, schools, police protection, and fire protection, and to all
property owners within six hundred feet (600') of the property as shown on the latest equalized
assessment roll;
H. Notice of the City Council hearing included the date, the time, and place of the
public hearing, the identity of the hearing body, the general explanation of the matter to be
considered, a general description in text or by diagram of the location of the Property that is
the subject of the hearing, and the notice of the need to exhaust administrative remedies;
I. City Council approves this Agreement by Ordinance based upon evidence and
findings of the Planning Commission and new evidence presented at its hearing on this
Agreement, giving its reasons therefor and setting forth the relationship between this
Agreement and the General Plan;
J. The benefits that will accrue to the people of the City of Temecula from this
Agreement are as follows:
1. Generation of municipal revenue;
2, Construction of public infrastructure facilities;
3. Acceleration of both the timely development of subject property as well
as the payment of municipal revenue;
4. Enhancement of quality of life for surrounding re, dents with the timely
development through the elimination of dust and nuisance of partially improved lots; and
5. Payment of Public Facility Fees (fire, library, traffic signal mitigation,
development and RSA).
Section 2. APPROVAl,. This Agreement, attached hereto and incorporated herein
by this reference as Exhibit A, is hereby approved subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit
B, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. The Mayor is authorized and
directed to evidence such approval by executing this Agreement for, and in the name of, the
City of Temecula; and the City Clerk is directed to attest thereto; provided, however, that this
Agreement shall not be executed by the City until this Ordinance takes effect and the City has
received from the applicant two executed originals of said Agreement.
Section 3. ,RF, VI::.IZARII,ITy. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions
of this Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall
hold any sentence, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall
not affect the validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance.
Section 4. NOTICI::, OF ADOPTION. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption
of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be posted as required by law.
Section 5. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty 00) days after its
passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. The City Clerk shall
publish a summary of this Ordinance and a certified copy of the full text of this Ordinance
shall be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five days prior to the adoption of this
Ordinance. Within 15 days from adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall publish a
summary of this Ordinance, together with the names of the Councilmembers voting for and
against the Ordinance, and post the same in the office of the City Clerk.
Section 6. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 10th day of June, 1997.
Patricia Birdsall, Mayor
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE)
CITY OF TEIVIEL-~3LA)
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Ordinance No.97-10 was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a
regular meeting of the City Council on the 27th day of May, 1997, and that thereafter, said
Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 10th
day of May 1997, by the following vote, to wit:
COUNCILMI~MBERS:
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
Employment
14,505
16,366
17,768
18,056
19,714
1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996
ISoume: CA EmploymenlDevelopmentDepa~mentl
City Employment, 1991-1996...
· In 1996. employment within the City of Temecula reached 19,714. This was a 6,124 job gain since the first
half of 1991 or 45.1%.
· Despite the recession, Temecula's employment has increased consistently from 1991-1996.
· Manufacturing has become the city's largest sector with 5,455 jobs. It is followed by Retail Trade at 4,370
and the Government, Education & Utility sector group at 1,910. The smallest sector was Engineering &
Management at 393 workers.
· The fastest growth rate from 1991-1996 was found in Hotel & Amusement, up 238.5% to 860 jobs. Next was
Business Services, up 112.0%; and Distribution & Transportation, up 80.2%. In that period, two related
sectors have lost jobs: Engineering & Management and Construction.
Exhibit 44.-Employment Summary
City of Temecula, First 6-Months, 1991-1996
Sector 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 %91-96
Manufactunng 5,455 5,281 5,108 4,750 3,605 3,209 70.0%
Retail Trade 4,370 4,178 4,074 3,498 3,204 2,867 52.4%
Government & Education & Utilities 1,910 1,819 1,759 1,483 1,383 1,225 55.9%
Distribution & Transportation 1,445 1,201 999 986 1,026 802 80.2%
Agriculture 1,193 956 1,109 1,127 986 1,086 9.9%
Construction 1,130 866 894 898 1,172 1,463 -22.8%
Other Services & Help Supply Agencies 1,048 1,102 1,262 931 831 617 69.9%
Hotel & Amusement 860 434 470 427 289 254 238.5%
Business Services 777 726 584 521 346 366 112.0%
Finance, Insurance, Real Estate 571 570 675 575 541 554 2.9%
Health Services 563 600 472 442 416 371 51.8%
Engineering & Management 393 325 363 729 708 776 -49.4%
TOTAL 19,714 18,056 17,768 16,366 14,506 13,590 45.1%
SouRCE: CA Employment Development Department
CiP,.' of lcntrcula
l'~vpan, d by Joint IK llusing, l'h.l).
Page 26
Employment
Exhibit 45.-Wage & Salary Employment Gain By Sector
City of Temecula, First S-Months, 1996
Mfg Retail
6{36
4.1
4!0 )
Travel ,Serv/Help Bus._Sv Health
Gov/Edu
168
Agr
i Soume: CA Employment Development Department I
........
Fin/RE Const
(383) ........
Eng/Mgt
Employment By Sector 1996, & Job Growth, 1991-1996...
· Temecula's beautiful surroundings, and concerted effort to lure high technology firms have made manufac-
turing the city's fastest growing sector numerically since 1991, up 2,246 jobs.
When a commumty sees increasing monies flow to it from the outside world, owing to the expansion of sec-
tors like Manufacturing and Distribution & Transportation, the secondary tier of its economy, including Re-
tail Trade (1,503), government & education(685) expands as a restfit.
In five of the past six years, Temecula has added jobs much faster than the Inland Empire. For instance, in
1996, it grew 9.2% versus 3.6% for the region. In 1993, it was 12.8% versus 0.6%. The only pause was a
slow 1.6%job growth in 1995, against 3.7% for the region.
Exhibit 46.-Wage & Salary Employment Growth Rates
City of Teme cula & Inland Empire, First 6-Months, 1991-1996
ImTemecula I:31nland Empire
12.8%
8.6%
9,2%
1992
3.7%
2.2%
1,6%
0.6%
1993 1994 1995
ISource: CA Employment Development DepartmentI
3.6%
1996
('it3. of Tcmccula
kS"l'~ifff~, P~p:m'd by &~hn E. Ilusin~o, l'h.I). Page 27
Employment
Exhibit 47.-Employment Distribution By Sector, 1996
City of Temecula, First 6-Months, 1996
(21.4%) Oth~...~.~.,..~ ~-.__. (27.7%) Mfg
(5.7%) co.= !~"'~"~'"';~,/~
~ 3%) Di~'::' -:~ .... ~ ¢2.2%) Retail
(9.7%) Gov/Edu
ISource:CA Employment Development Depa~tmentl
Employment Distribution, 1996 & 1991...
· In 1996, 27.7% of Temecula's jobs were in Manufacturing. This was up from 23.6% in 1991 as the sector
added 2,246 jobs.
· Most of other sectors maintained a relatively stable share of the city's jobs. An exception was Distribution &
Transportation which rose from 5.9% to 7.3%.
· Construction employment fell from 10.8% to 5.7% of the market as city housing sales slowed dramatically.
This sector will increase its share of employment in 1997 as residential markets are beginning to recover.
Exhibit 48.-Employme nt Distribution By Sector, 1991
City of Temecula, First 6-Months, 1991
(21.6%) Other ~ (23.6%) Mfg
ISource:CA Employment Development Department
(*it) of 'l't'mecula
k"f~'11'~ l'rt, parrd by Jolm 'E. 1Iusin~, l'h.D. l'a~e 28
Employment
Exhibit 49.-Wage & Salary Payroll
City of Temecula, First 6-Months, 1991-1996 nominal & CPI Adjusted
'1 [] no.inal · c.~ adiust.d [
-- $183
................................................... ~1~ ............. ~
$153
I.$~09 ............ $.1.1.3 .......
$205'~
$122
::::$135
$225
$248
$146
1991
1992 1993 1994 1995
Isourc,: c^ Employment Development Department I
1996
Wage & Salary Payroll 1991-1996...
· In 1991, the payroll for firms located in Temecula's was $153 million. In 1996, it was $248 million. That
was a gain of $95 million or 62.1% in just 5-years.
* When allowance is made for the increases in the Southern California Consumer Price Index, the purchasing
power of Temecula's payroll (1982-1984 dollars) rose from $109 million to $157 million, a $48 million gain.
* Of the $95 million increase in payroll, 11.7% or $18 million was attributable to inflation. The other $77
million represented a real increase in purchasing power or 50.3%.
Exhibit 50.-Components of Payroll Growth
City of Temecula, First 6-Months, 1991-1996
_ $95 mil (62.1%)
$77 mil (50.3%)
$18 mil (11.7%)
Nominal Growth Inflation Purchasing Power Growth
Source: CA Employment Development Department ~
('i~' ol*'l'emecula
Prepared b3 &Dim F. Ilu~in.o, l~h.I). l'a~e 29
Employment
Exhibit 51.-Wage & Salary Payroll Summar3'
City of Temecula, Fh'st 6-Months, 1991-1996
Sector 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 % 91-6
Manufactunng $94,755,933 $91,397,735 $80,642,084 $69,962,246 $56,167,819 $46,300,028 104.7%
RetailTrade 34,523,515 31,528,310 28,095,495 23,035,700 21,686,065 20,854,009 65.5%
Govt. &Education. &Util. 26,355,771 24,879,021 24,496,370 21,238,920 1g,650,701 17,677,432 49.1%
Distribution& Transportation22,484,673 18,110,445 14,790,175 13,838,499 12,954,562 9,710,962 131.5%
Construction 15,744,401 12,331,961 11,078,009 11,438,225 13,859,939 16,473,465 -4.4%
Agriculture 10,558,314 8,293,777 8,400,188 8,234,407 7,569,515 7,464,499 41.4%
Other Services & Help Agcy. 9,322,289 8,605,825 8,194,670 7,031,789 6,000,793 4,731,514 97.0%
Fmance, Insurance, RcalEst. 8,578,573 8,910,207 10,616,338 8,552,836 7,863,238 9,037,977 -5.1%
Business Services 7,507,968 6,170,119 4,784,707 4,046,442 3,275,495 4,371,733 71.7%
Health Services 6,508,300 6,523,824 4,992,687 4,453,086 4,017,408 3,565,263 82.5%
Engineering & Management 6,156,188 6,433,787 6,600,648 8,981,029 9,802,957 11,427,677 -46.1%
Hotel &:Amusement 5,068,238 2,265,383 2,395,228 2,325,688 1,626,472 1,130,785 348.2%
TOTAL $247,664.163 $228,450,394 $206,086,699 $183,138,867 $164,474,964 $152,745,34462.1%
Payroll Trends By Sector... 1991-1996
In 1996, Temecula's largest payroll was in Manufacturing ($94.8 million), followed by Retail Trade ($34.5
million). Government, Education & Utilities ($26.4 million), and Distribution & Transportation ($15. 7 mil-
lion)
The Manufacturing payroll was up a very strong $48 million or 104.7% from 1991-1996. In dollar terms,
Retail Trade grew second fastest, up $13.6 million or 65.5%. Distribution & Transportation grew $12.7 mil-
lion, or 131.5%, moving it from the sixth to the fourth largest paying employer group.
· The ciB"s weakest growth was in Engineering & Management, off$5.3 million or -46.1%
Exhibit 52.-Wage & Salary Payroll Gain By Sector
City of Temecula & Inland Empire, First 6-Months, 1991-1996
$48imil ! :
'
J $14~md$131mll'
......... .........' ........ .....i ........... ...............
.............................................................................................................. ~ ..........................................................L ......}..~.imit ........
Mfg ~etail ~ Gov~du 8e~/~lp Travel Bu~Sv Agr ~alth ~n/RE ~n~ Eng~gl
I$ou .: ~ Employment ~velopment ~pa~ment I
('iD ~J!' Tt'mccula
l'~rpa~d by Jolm E. llusin~-, Ph.l).
PaRe 30
Employment
Exhibit 53.-Wage & Salary Payroll Per Worker
City of Temecula, First 6-Months, 1991-1996 nominal & CPI Adjusted
$22,480
S15,96g
[~] nonlnal
1991
$24.972 $25,115
$22,678 $22,381 $2&13~5
's16,125 $15,967
515,533 $14,931
$15,231
1992 1993 1994 1995 1996
I Source: CA EmDIoyment Development Department ~
Pay Per Worker, 1991-1996...
Temecula workers were paid an average of $22,480 in 1991. In 1996, the average rose to $25,115, an 11.7%
gain. The 1996 average was the city's $248 million payroll divided by its 19,714 full & part time workers.
Southern California prices rose 11.7% between 1991 and 1996, roughly equal to the 11.7% growth in cid'
average pay. Thus, the $2,636 gain in average pay, was matched by a $2,640 increase in prices, leaving
workers $4.55 worse off in today's purchasing power.
· In 1982-1984 constant prices, the purchasing power of the city's average pay also remained almost constant,
falling $2 from $15,969 to $15,967. In 1996 prices, the decline was $4.55
· Note that average payroll is no~t average worker family income. The latter often includes income from more
than one worker.
Exhibit 54.-Components of Average Payroll Per Worker Change
City of Temecula, First 6-Months, 1991-1996
-- $2,636
(11.7%) $2,640 (11.7%)
Nominal Growth
($4.55) (.o.o%)
Inflation Purohasing Power Growth
ISource: CA Employment Development Depa~trnentI
(.'iO' of Tcmecula
l'tvpan~d by Jolm 'E. 11using, l'h.D.
Page 31
Employment
Exhibil 55.-Average Pay Per XVorker
City of Temecula, First 6-Months, 1991-1996
Sector 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 %91-96
Manufacturing $34,710 $34,615 $31,577 $29,480 $31,191 $28,842 20.3%
Engineering & Management 31,392 39,435 36,362 24,790 27,682 29,458 6.6%
Distribution & Transportation 31,111 30,187 29,611 28,071 25,230 24,248 28.3%
Finance, L,~surance, Real Estate 30,094 31,079 31,446 29,781 29,095 32,624 -7.8%
Construction 27,869 28,486 24,770 25,412 23,645 22,544 23.6%
Government & Education & Utilities 27,624 27,474 27,875 28,659 28,447 28,824 -4.2%
Health Seroices 23,113 21,739 21,145 20,162 19,333 19,220 20.3%
Business Services 19,299 16,979 16,373 15,532 18,902 24,046 -19.7%
Other Services & Help Agencies 17,757 15,616 12,984 15,105 14,682 15,335 15.8%
Agriculture 17,652 17,338 15,159 14,578 15,310 13,764 28.2%
Retail Trade 15,801 15,088 13,791 13,172 13,542 14,555 8.6%
Hotel&Amusement 11,819 10,439 10,193 10,919 11,272 8,858 33.4%
TOTAl, $25,125 $24,992 $23,093 $22,383 $22,687 $22,480 11.8%
SOLTECE: CA Employment Development Department-'
Average Pay Per Sector, 1991-1996 ...
In 1996, Temecula's best paying sectors were Manufacturing ($34,710), Engineering & Management
($31,392) and Distribution & Transportation ($31,111). The greatest 1991-1996 growth in average pay was
33.4% in the low paying Hotel & Amusement sector, followed by 28.2% in Agriculture.
Temecula is umque in having Manufacturing workers average well over $30,000 and Distribution & Trans-
potration also above that amount. In other Inland Empire cities, their average pay is in the $28,000-$29,000
range.
In the mid-range, average pay in Construction ($27.869) roughly equaled that in Government, Education &
Utilities ($27,624), and exceeded Health Services at (23,113). Public and utility sector pay fell 4.2% since
1991.
· Temecula's lowest 1996 average pay was in the Hotel & Amusement industry ($11,819), Retail Trade
($15,801), Agriculture ($17,652) and Other Services and Employment & Help Agencies ($17, 757).
$344.710 1
:
$31¢11 $30~094
$31~392
·
Mfg EnglMgt Dist
Exhibit 56.-Average Pay Per Worker By Sector
City of Temecula, First 6-Months, 1996
$28jlla ..........J~ ...........
$19 i,~99
Fin/RE Const GovlEdu Health B us...Sv ServlHelp Agr
Isource: CA Employment Development DepaRment I
$15,..~01
I
S11j819
Retail Travel
{ 'iD ol'Tc,nccula
k~l~H'IW~, l'~pared b3' &din F- IlusinR, 1'1~.1). PaRe 32
Employment
Exhibit 57.-Number of Firms
City of lem ecula, First 6-Months, 1991-1996
89
1,217
1,238
1,533
1,423
1,255
1991
1992 1993 1994 1995
ISource: CA Employment Development Department
1996
Number Firms Per Sector, 1991-1996...
The number of firms located in Temecula has risen from 1,189 in 1991 to 1,533 in 1996. That is a gain of
344 companies or 28.9%.
· Most of the growth in new finns occurred in 1995 and 1996. This marked a time when the Southern Califor-
nia recession was ending, and companies were looking for places to expand.
· The largest number of city finns are in Retail Trade (279), followed by Construction (222), Other Services &
Employment Agencies (194).
· The greatest growth rate for new firms has come in Distribution and Transportation (5Z3%), Business Serv-
ices (55.1%), and Other Services and Employment Agencies (43.2~ and Manufacturing (42.3~,f).
Exhibit 58.-Firms Per Sector
City of Temecula, First 6-Months, 1991-1996
Sector 1996
Retail Trade 279
Construction 222
Other Services & Help Supply Agcy 194
Distribution & Transportation 146
Manufacturing 130
Business Services 114
Finance, Insurance, Real Estate 113
Agriculture 107
Health Services 101
Engineering & Management 71
Hotel & Amusement 41
Government & Education & Utilities 19
TOTAL 1,533
sOURCE: CA Employment Development Department
1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 %91-96
259 234 231 231 223 24.9%
203 177 185 207 204 8.8%
188 164 153 138 136 43.2%
136 118 108 95 93 57.3%
122 113 98 92 91 42.3%
100 85 80 69 74 55.1%
106 81 87 93 93 21.6%
95 91 90 87 84 28.1%
101 89 94 90 83 21.7%
66 57 67 70 69 2.9%
34 33 29 29 29 39.7%
17 16 19 19 14 37.0%
1,423 1,255 1,238 1,217 1,189 28.9%
('it).' of 'l'emecula
I}'l~ttl~, Prypared b)' ,lohll F_ Ilusin~, I'h.l). Page 33
Employment
Exhibit 59.-Growth In Number of Firms By Sector
City of Temecula, First 6-Months, 1996
56
53
41
39
24
2O
18 18
12
Sew/Help Retail Did Bus_Sv Mfg Agr Fin/RE Con~l Health Travel
ISource: CA Employmenl [)evelopmenl Depaltment~
2
Gov/Edu Eng/Mgt
Every sector of Temecula's economy has added firms since 1991, led by Other Service & Employment Agencies with 59
new firms, Retail Trade with 56, and Distribution & Transportation with 53.
Note that the 133 of Temecula's 344 new ftrms are in Distribution & Transportation, Business Services and Manufac-
turing These sectors largely sell services and products outside of the Inland Empire. This is a good sign as they bring
fresh dollars to the commumty and expand its economic base.
Though Temecula has specialized in terms of Manufactttrmg employment and payroll, it has not truly specialized in any
sector, in terms of the number of fins. The largest concentrate is the 222 compames in Retailing. They represent just
18.2% of city firms. Construction, is next at 14.4%.
IdTlm;l[I;t~]l:3111;'l"qt[,], of Firms
City of Temecula, First ~Months, 1996
(36.8%) Other
(18,2%) Retail
04.4%) Const
(8.4%) Mfg
(9.5%) Dist
(12.7%) SeN/Help
ISource: CA Employment De~lopment DepamnentI
it3.' of lemecula
~' Jolm E. flusinR, l'h.]). Pa~e 34
Employment
Exhibit 61.-Average Size of Firms
City of Temecula, First 6-Months, 1991-1996
11.9
13.2
14.2
12.7 12.9
1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996
Isour,.: cA Employment Development DepaAment I
· Temecula's economy is largely made up of smaller finns. The average number of workers per firm grew
from 11.4 in 1991 to a high eft 14.2 in 1994. It has since stabilized at just under 13 workers per finn.
· Only one sector of Temecula's economy averaged over 100 workers: Govenunent & Education (103.4)
· The balance of the city's economy was composed of smaller firms led by Manufacturing at 42.1 workers, Ho-
tel & Amusement at 21.3, Retail Trade at 15.7 and Agriculture at 11.2.
· The balance of the economy is composed of firms with less than 10 employees.
Exhibit 62.-Average Number Workers Per Firm
City. of Temecula, First 6-Months, 1991-1996
Sector 1996
Government & Education & Utilities: 103.4
Manufacturing 42.1
Hotel & Amusement/c 21.3
Retail Trade 15.7
Agriculture 11.2
Distribution & Transportation 9.9
Business Services 6.8
Health Services 5.6
Engineering & Management 5.6
Other Services & Help Supply Agcy 5.4
Construction 5.2
Finance, Insurance, Real Estate 5.1
TOTAL 12.9
SOURCE: CA Employment Development Department
1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 °A,91-96
107.0 110.3 80.2 75.2 90.9 13.7%
43.3 45.4 48.7 39.4 35.3 19.5%
12.9 14.3 14.7 10.2 8.8 142.3%
16.2 17.5 15.2 13.9 12.9 22.1%
10.1 12.2 12.5 11.3 13.0 -14.1%
8.9 8.5 9.1 10.9 8.7 14.6%
7.3 6.9 6.5 5.0 5.0 37.1%
5.9 5.3 4.7 4.6 4.5 24.7%
5,0 6.4 10.9 10.1 11.3 -50.8%
5.9 7.7 6.1 6.0 4.6 19.0%
4.3 5.1 4.9 5.7 7.2 -28.3%
5.4 8.4 6.6 5.8 6.0 -15.3%
12,7 14.2 13.2 11.9 11.4 12.6%
{ 1D' of Temccula
l'wpan, d by ,Jolm E. Ilusin~, PILl).
Page 35
Employment
Exhibit 63.-Employment & Payroll Summary, First Six Months
City of Tcmccula, 1991-1996
1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991
Wage & salary. emplo.vment 19,714 18,056 17,768 16,366 14,505 13,590
Wage & salary. income $495,128,326 $450,900,788 $410,173,198 $366,277,734 $328,949,928 $305,490,688
Average pay level (annualized) $25,115 $24,972 $23,085 $22,381 $22,678 $22,480
Number of firms 1,533 1,423 1,255 1,238 1,217 1,189
Workers per firm 12.9 12.7 14.2 13.2 11.9 11.4
In comparing the 1991-1995 first six months employment data for Temecula, to the full year data, there is no
significance.
· The use of first half data, to allow inclusion of the available information on 1996, is thus probably reflective
of trends through 1996.
Exhibit 64.-Employment & Payroll Summary, Annual
Wage & salary employment
Wage & salary income
Average pay level (annualized)
Number of firms
Workers per firm
City of Temecula, 1991-1995
1996 1995 1994
18,616 17,910
$463,483,529 $416,328,128
$24,896 $23,246
1,470 1,280
12.7 14.0
1993 1992 1991
16,712 14,756 14,025
$377,272,737 $330,472,945 $310,874,082
$22,575 $22,396 $22,165
1,251 1,229 1,197
13.4 12.0 11.7
Ui~.' of 'l'emccula
l'~rpa~rd by Jolm E. Ilusin~, l'b-i).
Pa~oe 36
CITY OF TEMECULA
MARKETING PLAN
FY1997-98
ATTACttMENT C
INTRODUCTION
DRAFT
To a large extent, the 1997-1998 Marketing Plan for The City of Temecula reaffirms the
goals the marketing committee made last year to accelerate business development activities and
services, to gain a larger share of the tourism industry, and to provide effective umbrella
communication services to the City.
With this in mind, this plan is more of a continuation of the first plan. The plan is sound and
practicai, the next step is not to keep planning the work but work the plan.
The programs outlined herein are a function of work generated and cash flow. Constant
monitoring of them factors, together with periodic evaluation of marketing effectiveness, will allow
for all these programs to be completed effectively.
The key element determining the successful implementation of the marketing plan is not the
plan itself but the people involved in executing it.
SITUATIONAL ANALYSIS
The City of Temecula has emerged as one of the fastest growing regions in Southern
California and ranked as "The #1 Most Livable City in Riverside County". Temecula's dramatic
population growth between 1980 to present suggests that the quality of life is high, and that the city
will continue to grow in its appeal as the area is promoted to all of its markets.
Temecula offers a variety of community features-- affordable housing, scenic location, award
winning schools, low crime rate, numerous neighborhood and community parks and recreational
facilities -- that shows evidence of the city's commitment to maintaining a quality living environment.
Temecula also offers a desirable business climate to attract new businesses to its area -- low
land cost, highly skilled labor force, business assistance programs, and quality of life offered to its
employees.
The City has a host of appealing events and attractions, and together with its mildly seasonal
climate, good air quality year round, and its convenient location, create an inviting destination that
can position Temecula as an inviting tourist destination.
A number of outdoor activities including championship golf courses, hot air ballooning,
hiking, camping, and boating and fishing at Lake Skinner provide recreational opportunities for all
age groups. For entertainment, residents and visitors enjoy antiquing in Old Town along with wine-
tasting and tours offered at 12 popular wineries.
The area's attributes and tourism-friendly environment coupled with a strong publicity
campaign will boost awareness of the city, and enhance its economic development. As the City's
marketing program was developed to include both business development and tourism, we must keep
in mind that each division plays an important role which effects the other. The program has a strong
emphasis on tourism promotion which not only is instrumental in establishing Temecula as a tourism
destination but also positions Temecula as a place to establish a business. The tourism campaign is
used as a "hook" to attract business development to the area by bringing the conception that
Temecula has more to offer than just a nice place to visit. Thus, it is imperative that Temecula
continues to move forward with implementing its marketing program in attracting select businesses
and visitors to the city.
2
o
GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
Increase the Number of Businesses Locating and Expanding in Temecula
Accelerate business development activities and services.
A. Position the City as an ideal location for businesses to locate and expand in
Temecula.
B. Position Temecula as "business friendly".
C. Communicate the many business success stories in Temecula.
D. Continue to serve existing businesses and keep abreast of their expansion plans.
Increase the Number of Tourists Visiting Temecula
Gain a larger share of the tourism industry.
A. Increase the number of weekday overnight visitors.
B. Increase the number of weekend and weekday non-overnight visitors.
C. Increase the number of weekend overnight visitors.
D. Increase awareness ofTemecula Valley's features as a tourist destination.
E. Continue the response program to consumer inquiries about Temecula.
F. Increase attendance at all Temecula events.
Provide Umbrella Communication Services to the City of Temecula
Effective communication is critical in executing the marketing plan.
A. Continue coordinated communication efforts of the City's marketing committee
consisting of the EDC, Chamber of Commerce, Vintner's Association, OTTMA,
County of Riverside, Temecula Valley Film Council, Inland Empire Economic
Partnership/Inland Empire Tourism Council, Special Events Representative and
the City, to communicate a single, unified message.
B. Continue coordinated communication efforts with the local commercial
brokerage community and lodging industry.
C. Continue to provide general communication advice and counsel to the City of
Temecula as required.
3
TARGET AUDIENCES
Economic Development
A. Specific Clean Industries
Small to mid-size companies located in:
High-tech manufacturing and communication services
Paper and plastics industry
Health related manufacturing services
Vineyards/Vintners
B. Real Estate Industry
Business relocation consultants specialists
California commercial brokers
Lenders and financial community
C. Business Owners and Decision Makers
Throughout California and the West
Emphasis on Southern California (Los Angeles, San Diego and Orange Counties)
D. Business Executives and Decision-Makers Who Visit Temecula
Overnight visitors
Golf course patrons
Winery visitors
Special event attendees
E. Temecula Residents and Businesses
4
TARGET AUDIENCES
Tourism
A. Adults (ages 25-55)
Middle to upper income
Singles and couples
Within driving distance
B. Vacationers (Couples and Families)
Vacationers planning a trip to Southern California
Vacationers already in San Diego, Orange and Los Angeles Counties
C. Select Affinity Groups
Tour groups
Motor coach tours
Cruise Lines through San Diego
Convention groups (spouse/companion activities)
Association business groups (corporate recognition - i.e. president's clubs)
D. Young Adults (ages 18-25)
Active recreation seekers
Potential patrons of Temecula dining and entertainment establishments
E. Active Mature Adults (ages 55+)
Middle to upper income
Los Angeles, San Diego and Orange Counties
Singles, couples and groups
DRAFT
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MARKETING CAMPAIGN
I. Outreach Materials
Design and produce various outreach materials that will assist in the development of
awareness and exposure for Temecula among business executives. The focus will include
business and media outreach.
A. Business Development Kit
1. Reprint folder kit
Expenses: $5,000
Lead Organization: City
B. City of Temecula Demographic Book
Update demographic information.
Develop and print slick demographic booklet compatible in design to
the business folder kit. The demographic book will be distributed at
trade shows as well as included in the City's business brochure.
Expenses: $5,000
Lead Organization: City
C. Business Testimonial Piece
Marketing piece on testimonials from businesses relocating and expanding in
Temecula . This will be used as a direct mail piece, included in the business
development kit and distributed at trade shows.
Expenses: $2,500
Lead Organization: City
D. Direct Mail Literature
Design and develop a direct mail piece targeted to businesses in San
Fernando Valley, 1-10 & 1-15 corridor, and the City's existing business
data base.
Expenses: $5,000
Lead Organization: City
6
E. CD Rom
Unique marketing tool utilized for business and tourism attraction. Information
includes City demographics, tourism entities and special events.
Update existing City CD Rom.
Reorder CD Rom for business development program.
Expenses: $2,500
Lead Organization: City
F. Photography Library
Prepare top quality marketing photography for promoting business development
and tourism marketing collateral and for use in marketing efforts.
Hire professional photographers.
Photo materials - prints, slides, transparencies, etc.
Expenses: $4,000
Lead Organization: City
H. Selected Industry Outreach
The marketing committee has agreed on targeting small to mid-size companies within
the following industries to target: High-tech Manufacturing and Communication
Services, Paper, Plastics, Health Related Manufacturing Services, and Vineyards/
Vintners. These successful "clean" industries as well as vineyards have an established
presence within the City and have the greatest potential to grow.
A. Review EDC Research on Individual Temecula Companies
Update prospective business database.
Maintain list of prospective businesses and monitor follow-up. Establish a
tracking system.
Expenses: -0-
Lead Organization: City
B. Research Specific Industry Communication Tactics
Continue to investigate and join associations.
Update industry trade media list.
Expenses: -0-
Lead Organization: City
Develop and Implement Tactics for Each Industry
Media outreach, association outreach and trade show participation.
Attend 3 trade shows in partnership with California Trade &
Commerce and Inland Empire Economic Partnership.
Expenses: $3,000
Lead Organization: City
Retention Committee for Community Businesses
1. Sustain and nurture existing businesses in Temecula.
2. Establish a business retention program to focus on the top 20 companies in the
area.
Expenses: -0-
Lead Organizations: EDC, Chamber, City
Reception Committee For Businesses
Structure a reception committee for businesses that have relocated to the area.
Mail relocation packet and other pertinent material on Temecula as a
business plans its move.
Once a business has made a commitment to the area, the committee will
personally visit the new businesses welcoming them to the area.
Expenses: -O-
Lead Organization: Chamber
Fe
Site Selectors Industrial Tour
The industrial tour is a unique opportunity for the City of Temecula to
promote the City's growing business climate to a select group of site selectors.
Identify a select group of site selectors and invite them for an
industrial tour including golf, wine tour, meals and lodging.
Establish a program for the tour.
Provide information on Temecula's business climate and
unique opportunities.
Expenses: $1,000
Lead Organization: City
8
G. Business Outreach Through Golf/Lodging Industry
2.
3.
4.
Meet with local golf/lodging representatives.
Follow-up with key business and business executives staying at local
hotels and golf resorts.
Provide a gift basket and business relocation information to the
qualified contact for each visiting business group.
Continue follow-up with the company through our direct mail
program and personal follow-up.
Expenses: $500
Lead Organization: City
"The Right Fit" Direct Mail Program
Direct mail campaign targeted to executives and businesses along 1-10
corridor, Manufacturer's Council member list and City's master business
economic database. An invitation is extended for a free game of golf and a tour
of Zevo Golf's facilities. Respondents only will receive a complimentary shirt.
Polo shirts will also be available for purchase at the Chamber.
2.
3.
4.
Mail out the "Right Fit" direct mail piece.
Plan activities for businesses that respond to the direct mail
piece. Activities include: golf, lunch and tour of Zevo Golf's facilities.
A complementary Temecula polo shirt will be sent to those receiving
the invitation who respond.
Provide information on the business opportunities Temecula offers.
Temecula Polo Shirts
Expenses: $9,900
Lead Organization: City
Direct Mail Program
Expenses: $1,000
Lead Organization: City
Regional Business Media Outreach
Through opportunities created by tourism and successful business development efforts,
there will be opportunities to bring a greater awareness of Temecula to business owners
through the general business press.
A. Press Materials
Write background release, fact sheet, EDC release.
Determine "City approved" media materials.
Expenses: -0-
Lead Organization: City
B. Establish Working News Bureau
Respond to media inquiries and requests for information.
Continue to respond to editorial placement opportunities such as special
supplements in the regional Business Journals.
Update and maintain database of influential business media.
Generate articles regarding business development news in regional press.
Publicize individual company success stories to general media in region (four
per year).
Reprints of articles for business press kits and direct mail pieces.
Expenses: $3,000
Lead Organization(s): City
IV. Real Estate Outreach
A key audience for the City's business development efforts are commercial brokers,
business relocation consultants and builders. These key publics assist business decision-
makers with relocation needs and should have a strong and favorable opinion of the City of
Temecula.
A. Outreach to Commercial Brokers, Builders and Lenders
o
Update list of influential brokers for EDC database.
Produce 1 page real estate audience newsletter including news and
information about new sites, local business relocations and expansions, land
availability and land costs in Temecula. Distribute to real estate database
semi-annually.
Local commercial broker marketing ideas meetings - three
meetings per year.
Expenses: $2,000
Lead Organization: City
B. Outreach to Business Relocation Consultants
Update list from IEEP, business publications and business lists. Add to
business development database.
10
Write editorial for trade magazines.
Evaluate selected advertising.
Expenses: -0-
Lead Organization: City
V. Selected Advertising
Research and recommend targeted advertising opportunities to reach the business community.
All advertising will maintain a consistent and strong message on economic development for
Temecula.
A. Develop Print Ad
Produce one industry-specific ad.
Reprints of published print ads and editorials for press kits and direct
mailings.
Expenses: $3,000
Lead Organization: City
B. Identify Advertising Venues and Buy Media
Pursue media co-operative advertising buys with other area businesses, developers
and organizations to stretch Temecula's advertising budget.
Place ads in relocation business supplements in San Diego, Orange, San
Gabriel and San Fernando and Los Angeles County Business Journals.
Place an ad in one specific industry trade magazine.
Research various radio advertising means. Consider co-op advertising with
the County of Riverside EDA and Inland Empire Economic Partnership.
Expenses: $15,000
Lead Organization: City
VI. Community Relations
In order to stay "business friendly", the economic development program of the City as
well as its marketing campaign, must be communicated clearly and positively to the businesses
and citizens of Temecula. Their acceptance and buy-in will make both internal and external
efforts easier to implement successfully.
Schedule City Speaking Opportunities and Other Presentations to Professional
Organizations
1. Develop briefing presentation on the importance of economic development,
11
tourism outreach and the marketing campaign.
Schedule presentations to Chamber of Commerce, Rotary Club, OTTMA,
brokers, and professional organizations.
Expenses: -0-
Lead Organization: City
B. Continue To Schedule Media Roundtables
Invite local media representatives to media roundtables that feature the marketing
committee and other local business leaders discussing marketing efforts for tourism
and business development activities.
Expenses: -0-
Lead Organization: City
VII. Real Estate Facilitator Outreach in Orange and Los Angeles Counties
A planned event to reach out directly to select individuals in the real estate industry in
Orange and Los Angeles Counties. The event will also provide an opportunity to generate
substantial media awareness of our economic development efforts.
Expenses: $2,500
Lead Organization: City
VIII. Marketing Meetings (Business Development and Tourism)
Bi-monthly marketing meetings scheduled with key tourism and business development
representatives including the City, EDC, Chamber, OTTMA, Vintners Association, Local
Special Events Representative, Inland Empire Tourism Council, Inland Empire Economic
Partnership, Film Council and County of Riverside to share individual activities, network and
strategize.
12
TOURISM MARKETING CAMPAIGN
DRAFT
Outreach Materials
An important part of the marketing campaign is an aggressive outreach to travel media, travel
industry writers and travel industry professionals. Outreach will focus on establishing
awareness with the travel industry along with establishing Temecula as a desirable destination
for travel.
Press Kit - Press kits to be used for information materials during familiarization
tours, as handout to media at specific events and as part of an on-going public
relations direct mail program.
Update press releases and background features.
Secure and duplicate photos and maps.
Follow-up with all media who receive the kit, by phone or through written
communication.
Assemble press kits and distribute to tourism industry.
Expenses: $2,500
Lead Organization: City
B. Tourism Brochure
Reprint tourism brochure.
Distribute brochure through rack service in San Diego and Orange
Counties. Additional distribution includes special events and businesses
in Temecula and the brochure is included in press kits and business
brochures.
Expenses: $9,900
Lead Organization: City
Media Relations
Extensive media relations will continue to be an important outreach to achieve our goals
of generating overnight visits and development of attendance for all Temecula events.
Mailings and direct contact with regional consumer and travel media are included.
A. Update and Maintain Media Lists
Continue to update and maintain a comprehensive media contact list that
includes editors, publishers and/or writers from leading travel, lifestyle and
business publications and newspapers.
13
Update and maintain list of contacts of California Visitors and Convention
Bureaus, convention and meeting planners, travel agents, and tour/motor
coach operators.
Expenses: $1,500
Lead Organization: City
Monthly Event Publicity
2.
3.
4.
Research and write monthly event release, spotlighting a specific event.
Research and write monthly calendar of events.
Update monthly the long lead calendar of events.
Press releases regarding people, places and amenities that make Temecula
such a unique and desirable community (i.e. hiking in Santa Rosa Plateau,
hot air ballooning).
Distribute and follow-up with appropriate media.
Expenses: $4,000
Lead Organization: City
Respond to Media Inquiries
Respond to phone calls and written inquiries from media regarding tourism and
special events.
Follow-up with key media to assure coverage of events and receipts of
materials.
Expenses: $1,500
Lead Organization: City
Travel Media Outreach
Update list of key regional and national travel publications and writers.
Distribute press kit with pitch letter.
Research and write article on topics including golf vacations, romantic
getaways and jazz weekends.
Expenses: $2,500
Lead Organization: City
Tourist Guidebook Outreach
Guide books tourists use in planning their itineraries in Southern California.
1. Identify appropriate guide books including those issued by the State of
14
California, Automobile Clubs, Commercial Publishers and In-Hotel Room
Publications.
Write and distribute copy about various Temecula attractions, events,
activities and it's history.
Expenses: $500
Lead Organization: City
Tourism Industry Newsletter
A two-color newsletter targeted to regional, national and international travel and
tour operators.
Write and produce a six panel tourism industry newsletter twice a year.
Develop industry database and mail.
Expenses: $6,000
Lead Organization: City
Long-lead Event Calendar
Research upcoming events.
Produce long-lead calendar.
Mail calendar every six months to long-lead consumer and tourism trade
media and designated media planners.
Expenses: $1,000
Lead Organization: City
Media Familiarization Tours
2.
3.
4.
5.
Develop media list for invitation to a fam tour in Temecula and mail.
Establish itinerary, lodging and transportation.
Work with local hotels, restaurants and wineries for sponsorships.
Plan media days for special events.
Partner with Inland Empire Tourism Council on hosting media faro
tours.
Expenses: $3,000
Lead Organization: City
Cable/Public Access
Identify and exploit all regional and cable opportunities for exposure regarding
Temecula tourism.
15
Send calendar of special events monthly.
Coordinate spokespersons for cable programs when opportunities arise.
Utilize all means available to secure a commitment from a major regional
television program to have the show broadcast for a limited time period from
Temecula.
Expenses: 0
Lead Organization: City
J. Visitors Guide
Update and reprint the 1997 visitor guide that represents all the
tourism aspects of Temecula.
Expenses: -O-
Lead Organization: Chamber
lIl. Travel Industry Outreach
An outreach campaign will be conducted to the travel industry, primarily focusing on industry
segments as: convention and meeting planners, travel agents, tour associations, and bus/motor
coach operations. Efforts will be made to partner with San Diego, Los Angeles, and Orange
County entities when possible.
A. Industry Mailings
Identify lists of specific industry individuals and media.
Prepare material and distribute.
Follow-up.
Expenses: $1,500
Lead Organization: City
B. Trade Show Participation
Participate in one tourism trade show (tour association meeting and group
tour planners, consumer tourism).
Coordinate City involvement and logistics.
Expenses: $3,000
Lead Organization: Chamber
IV. Selected Advertising
Research and recommend targeted advertising opportunities to reach the tourism industry.
16
Vo
VI.
All advertising will maintain a consistent and strong message on tourism for Temecula.
A. Develop Print Ad
1. Work with designer to develop one tourism-specific ad.
2. Reprints of' print ads for press kits and direct mailings.
Expenses: $2,000
Lead Organization: City
B. Identify Advertising Venues and Buy Media
Pursue media co-operative advertising buys with other area organizations
stretch Temecula's advertising budget.
1. Place ads in up to three tourism industry trade publications.
Expenses: $15,000
Lead Organization: City
Marketing Workshops
tO
These workshops will consist of public relations and advertising workshops
for Temecula small businesses and merchants to use in furthering their individual
marketing efforts.
City of Temecula Marketing Workshops
1. Small Business Development
Coordinate subject matter with Chamber and OTTMA.
Develop overheads and handouts for group.
Lead interactive workshops.
Expenses: -0-
Lead Organization: Chamber
Integrated Marketing Tactics
A strong effort will be made to reach business decision-makers who are visiting Temecula
as tourists to bring awareness of business opportunities in the area. The projects listed can
greatly enhance the synergy of both economic development and tourism marketing
activities.
A. Reprint table tents with economic development message points to be displayed
17
VII.
VIII.
on tables of local restaurants, hotel rooms and local business conference rooms.
B. Tag tourism advertisements with economic development messages.
C. Promote economic development at all Temecula special events.
Expenses: $1,500
Lead Organization: City
Sponsored Items
A. Tourism Site on World Wide Web
Update material and add to existing site.
Maintain a linkage of all Temecula Internet sites and produce additional sites
where warranted.
Establish a tracking system to be put in place on the sites to properly measure
interest (hits).
Expenses: -0-
Lead Organizations: EDC and Chamber
Services
A. Rack Service
Rack service distribution throughout San Diego and Orange Counties.
Expenses: $7,000
Lead Organization: City
18
BUDGET SUMMARY
BUSENESS DEVEI,OPMENT
Tactic
Eee$
Economic Development:
Outreach Materials
1-A Business Development Kit
1-B Demographic Book
1-C Business Testimonial Piece
1-D Direct Mail Literature
1-E CD Rom
1-F Photography Library
-0-
Selected Industry Outreach 2-A Research on Temecula Companies
2-B Research Specific Industry
2-C Trade Show Participation
2-D Retention Committee
2-E Reception Committee
2-F Site Selectors Industrial Tour
2-G Business Outreach
2-H "The Right Fit" Direct Mail Program/
Polo Shirts
-0-
Regional Business Media Outreach 3-A Press Materials
3-B Maintain Public Relations Program
-0-
Real Estate Outreach
4-A Outreach to Commercial Brokers,
Builders and Lenders
4-B Outreach to Business Relocation
Consultants
-0-
Selected Advertising 5-A Print Ads
5-B Advertising
-0-
Community Relations
Real Estate Facilitator Outreach
Expen.
$ 5,000
$ 5,0O0
$ 2,500
$ 5,OOO
$ 2,5OO
$ 4,000
-0-
3,0OO
1,000
500
1,000
9,900
-0-
$ 3,000
$ 2,000
$ 3,000
$15,000
o0-
$ 2,500
DRAFT
Organ.
City
City
City
City
City/EDC
City
City
City
City/EDC
EDC
Chamber
City
City
City
City
City
City
City
City
City
City
City
City
tOTALS
-0-
$64,900
19
BUDGET SUMMARY
TOURISM
T~ctic
Tourism:
Outreach Materials 1-A Press Kit
1-B Tourism Brochure
Media
Relations
2-A Media Lists
2-B Monthly Publicity
2-C Media Response
2-D Travel Media Outreach
2-E Tourist Guidebook
2-F Tourism Industry Newsletter
2-G Long-leadEvent Calendar
2-H Fam Tours
2-I Cable/Public Access
2-J Visitors Guide
Travel
Outreach
3-A Mailings
3-B Trade Show Participation
Selected Advertising 4-A Print Ads
4-B Advertising
Marketing Workshops
Marketing Tactics
Sponsored Items
Rack Services in San Diego and Orange Counties
TOTALS
DRAFT
Fees Expen. Organ.
-0-
$ 2,500 City
$ 9,900 City
-0- $1,500 City
-0- $ 4,000 City
-0- $1,500 City
-0- $ 2,500 City
-0- $ 500 City
-0- $ 6,000 City
-0- $1,000 Chamber
-0- $ 3,000 City
-0- $ -0- City
-0- -0- Chamber
-0- $1,500 City
-0- $ 3,000 Chamber
-0- $ 2,000 City
-0- $15,000 City
-0- -0- Chamber
-0- $ 1,500 City
-0- -0- EDC/Chamber
-0- $ 7,000 City
-0-
$62,400
TOTAL MARKETING BUDGET
-0-
$127,300
20
FU-ND]~TG REQUEST
ATTAC~E~T D
27450 YBez Rd., Suite 104
Temecmla, CA 92591
PhoBe (909) 676-5090 · Fax (909) 694-020!
March 31, 1997
Mayor Pat Birdsall
City of Temecula
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
Dear Mayor Birdsall:
Enclosed please find our 1996/97 budget, a current financial statement as of February 28,
1997, a September 30, 1996 Fiscal Year-end financial statement, and a recap of"Services
Provided to the City".
We appreciate the City's past support and recognition of the Chamber's valuable
contributions to our city. The City's increased contract in 1996 from $45,000 to $80,000
proved beneficial in our ability to provide even more quality services.
As we continue to experience growth, the Chamber will continue to provide unmatched
service to visitors, potential residents, and potential businesses.
The Chamber's aggressive fund-raising efforts make it possible to provide services to the
city at a fraction of the cost. The total value of services provided is $340,680 and we are
requesting just 33%. The City's $112,425 will ensure the Chamber's goal; to provide
the best possible services!
We look forward to meeting with you to discuss further the oppommities of our
continued joint efforts.
Sincerely,
Terry Gilmore
President
CC:
City Council Members
Ron Bradley, City Manager
Mary Jane McLamey, Assistant City Manager
27450 Ynez Rd., Shire 104
Temecnla, CA 92591
Phone (909) 676-5000 · Fax (909) 694-0201
Value of Services Provided to the City
Total %
Tourism
177,380
52%
Visitor Guides
Satellite Visitor Centers (9)
Postage/Faxes/Printed materials
Internet-Tourist Information
Visitor Outreach
Long Lead Event Calendar
Trade Show Participation
Tourism Industry Newsletter
Marketing Committee Participation
65,000
74,880
15,000
7,500
7,500
4,000
1,000
5OO
1,000
Community Information
89,000
26%
Pictorial
Walk-in/Telephone Traffic
Maps
Relocation Packets
Demographic Information
Special Events
Calendar of Events
Internet - Relocation/Calendar/Schools
30,000
30,000
10,000
8,000
4,000
3,000
2,000
2,000
Cit~ Promotions
44,800
13%
Shop Temecula First Campaigns (2)
Business of the Month Program
Business Showcases
Mystery Shopper Campaign
Holiday Lights/4th of July Float
Internet - Local Businesses
Marketing Seminars (Customer Service)
State of the City luncheon
CD Rom
28,000
4,800
2,000
2,000
1,000
3,000
2,000
1,500
500
Education/Government
23,000
7%
Registry
Scholarships
Student of the Month
School Promotions Brochure
Issue Awareness
4,000
4,000
4,000
6,000
5,000
Economic Develo, ment Marketing Campaign
6,500
2%
Provide support to existing
Temecula business
Schedule City Speaking Opportunities
Welcoming Committee (Ribbon Cuttings)
Follow up on Company Leads
1,500
1,000
1,500
2,500
GRAND TOTAL 340,680
0
Services Provided to the City
(Detailed)
TOURISM
The Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce Tourism Committee is comprised of volunteers from tourist
related entities in the community such as the wineries, Old Town, Nature Couservancy, hotels, and
restaurants. The committee continues to strive to promote the tourism industry in Temecula.
Visitor Guides - An updated guide is currently available in several local businesses that have high tourist
traffic, the satellite visitor centers, and at all local major events. In addition, the Chamber mails the guide
to any individual requesting tourist information.
Satellite Visitor Centers - Due to the success of the original two centers, the Chamber now manages a
total of nine centers to ensure easy access to visitors exiting either Rancho California Road or Winchester
Road from the 1-15. The centers provide weekend visitors with a visitor guide, demographics and/or
relocation information.
Postage/Printed materials - As a result of the city's marketing efforts there has been an obvious increase
in postage and printing of materials such as housing tracts, schools, realtors, demographics, employment
opportunities, apartment rentals, and other specific requests.
Internet - Tourist Information - Information on all tourist aspects of the city are available worldwide. The
website address is WWW.TEMECULA.ORG
Visitor Oulxeach - The Tourism Committee's "goodie bag" concept has proven to be a big hit with groups
corning into Temecula for sports related activities or tour groups. The bags are full of information and
goodies from Temecula. The goal is to ensure that these individuals are aware of ALL the tourist aspects
of Temecula so that they will return in the future. This projects also helps promote local business.
1 .ong l.ead g. vent Calendar - The Chamber provides the City's Marketing Department with calendar
information on a regular basis. This information is used to promote upcoming events.
Trade Show Participation - Chamber staff is available on an "as-needed" basis to help at various trade
shows.
Tourism Industry Newsletter - Chamber staff is available to assist with conceptual ideas for the newsletter.
Marketing Committee Participation - Chamber staff actively participates in the Marketing Committee and
attends monthly meetings held at the City.
COMMUNITY INFORMATION
Pictorial - An updated pictorial is scheduled for 1997! This comprehensive guide provides a profile of
business and industry, medical and health services, lifestyle and real estate, education, transportation,
shopping, arts and culture, recreation, and city and county resources.
Walk-in/Telephone Traffic - The Chamber is dedicated to providing quality, professional service. See
attached Activity Reports.
Maps - An updated map is available at the Chamber and all Satellite Visitor Centers.
Relocation Packets - The relocation packet has proved to be a valuable asset to anyone interested in
moving to Temecula. It is used by many local manufacturers to assist their employees that are relocating to
the area. It includes information on schools, utilities, city and government offices, law enforcement,
hospitals, climate, and a commnnity profile.
Demographic Information - The Chamber assembles, customizes, and dislxibutes current information
including census, commumty growth figures, demographic studies, and an economic profile from
Riverside County, the State of California and the Economic Development Corporation.
Special Events - The Chamber "makes it their business" to provide details on all special events to interested
callers. Instead of referring the caller to make another call to obtain the information, Chamber staff will
provide the caller with as much information as possible. This is especially important for events such as
Balloon & Wine, Rod Run, Taste of the Valley, Arts Festival and Tractor Races.
Calendar of Events - Staff interacts with all groups and organizations to keep a current community calendar
for all events planned in the community. Citizens and visitors have come to depend on the Chamber's
Calendar of Events; the only comprehensive monthly listing of events citywide.
Intemet (Relocation/Calendar/Schools - All printed information distributed is now available on the internet.
CITY PROMOTIONS
Shop Temecula Fixst Campaign - Due to the success of the 1995 and 1996 campaigns, the Local Business
Promotions Committee is coordinating two campaigns in 1997. The campaign promotes shopping locally
and gives residents awareness of the availability of products and services in our own community while
keeping tax dollars in the community.
Business of the Month Program - The Local Business Promotions Committee started a new recognition
program in 1997 which will provide visibility to businesses that go "over and above" for the community.
Business Showcases - Local businesses have the opportunity to introduce theix products and services to the
commumty.
Mystery Shopper Campaign - Each month, the Local Business Promotions Committee sends out Mystery
Shoppers to local businesses. The business with the highest points wins the Mystery Shopper award. This
provides awareness to the community as well as to the businesses.
Holiday/4* of July Float - Floats are decorated and displayed to encourage folks to shop locally.
Internet - Local Businesses - An entire list of Chamber Members (over 900) is available worldwide through
the internet.
Marketing Seminars - These seminars are free to local business owners and managers and focus on
providing them with tips on Customer Service.
State of the City Luncheon - A luncheon is coordinated to provide the Mayor of Temecula an opportunity
to showcase the City's plans for the year.
CD Rom - The Chamber advertised on the City's CD Rom and will participate in promoting the sales of
this product.
EDUCATION-GOVE. RNM'E. NTAI,
Registry. - The Chamber's Education Committee started the registry program in 1995. The registry is a
valuable resource to educators and students. It provides information on businesses that have committed to
participate in various programs such as Career Days, Job Shadowing, Job Exposure, Mentorship
Programs, Speakers and Material Contributions.
Scholarshil>s - The Chamber awards four scholarships to graduating high school students each year.
Student of the Month - This program recognizes two students from each of the thxee local high schools
each month.
School Promotions Brochure - The Education Committee presented a new brochure featuring all of
Temecula's schools. This full-color glossy brochure is distributed thxough the Chamber office, Satellite
Visitor Centers and the City of Temecula.
Issue Awareness - Issues relating to business are reviewed by the Governmental Action Committee and
when necessary a position is taken. The committees positions are published m local newspapers as well as
in the monthly newsletter.
ECONOMIC DEVF, I,OPMF. NT MARICF, TING CAMPAIGN
Support of Existing Temecula Businesses - Chamber staff is available to make courtesy calls to existing
businesses to ensure their needs are being met.
City Speaking Opportunities - Speaking oppormrdties are scheduled at various groups when there is a need
to provide "quick" information throughout the commtmity. A good example of this is the Measure C
Campaign.
Welcoming Committee = The Chamber schedules ribbon cuttings for new businesses.
Follow up on Comoany Leads - Chamber staff follows-up on all company leads.
CITY CONTRA CT HISTOR Y
Services Provided
City Contract
% of Services
Paid by City
1993
$ 65,000 $45,000 69%
1994
$103,100 $45,000 44%
1995
$122,400 $45,000 37%
1996
1996
$303,740 $100,234
$ 8O,OOO
33% (requested)
26.4% (received)
1997 $340,680 $112,425 33%
oo
'0 oo °°888 88 88 8 88 8 8 8 88 88 88888888 8 8
0o 00008 88 88 8 °° 8 8 8 88 88 88°°°800
oo oo
ooo
oo oooo ...............
6J ,,.:,6,a6,~ 6~ oo o oo o o o oo oo oo6o&~66
o~n r- o u, o~- o o o in in o oo
oo 00000 o o o o oo o o oooo o
~ ....... 88 08 8 88 o 8 o 08 oo o8o8oooo 8 o
0,. ~8~0~ o 8~ o 8 o o o ~
oo ooooo oo oo oo o o o oo oo oooooooo o o
oo ooooo oo oo 8 oo o o o oo oo oooooooo ojo
88 88888 88 88 8 88 8 8 8 88 88 88888888 8 8
88 88888 88 88 8 88 8 8 8 88 88 88888888 8 8
888
888
888
888
oo oooo 00 o o 00 o o o oo oo ooooooo o
b ...... 8 oo 08 ................. 8 o 8. 8.8.~
J~ ,~ o ,,, o o oo o oo oo ooooooo ~
0 .... 8~,8~- 8 8 8 o 8 ~ ~ 8 8 ~
oooooo§ 88~8
ooo
o88oooo8,- o88~88888~888 . .B . 80 8 .BRB . 8~8888 ~ o 8 ~oo~
888888888888888888888888 8 888 8 88 8 8888 8 888888'8 8 8 °°8°°°°8
..... ~.
88888 °° 8 8888888888 8 888 8 88 $ 88~8 ~ 888888 8 8 8 88°0°°88
oooooooooooo~ooooooooooo o oo o o o oo o ooooo o o o oooooooo o
............... oooooo .... 008 o 80 o 8o~8 ~ °°°°°8 ............
~ ~ooooooooom~o~000000ooO ~ 0oo 0 O0 0 O0 0 O0 OhO ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~
ooo0oo0oo000000000000000 0 O0 -0 O0 0 0000 0 000000 0 0 0 0000o00o
5 ........................... 8 ........ I
oooooo oooooooooooo oo o o - o
...... 8 ............ 8oo88 8 880 8 88 8 88~8 ~ 880888 8 8 8 88888888
~ ~666&6~66~6~666666666 ~ 6~6 ~ 66 6 66 '6 ' 6~66~6 ~ 6 6 ~6666666
0°°880°08888 8 888 8 80 8 88~8
6666666666~6~4666666666 ~ 666 6 66 6 6~ '6
oooocooooooooooooooooooo o 0oo 0 oo o o000 0 000000 o 0 o 00oo0ooo o o
....... oo~ 8 ~ °°° ~ °° ° ~ °°°°~° ~ ° ° °°8 ..... ~
ooooooooo .... ooooo8oo8~8 8 888 8 oo o 8o~8 ~ 800088
0°8°08°0000000°00o00 8 888 8 8 °°°8 ~ 888888 8 8 8 8°°°°~°
oo8OOO oo 8 8 ~
ooo oo oo~ oo~
oo oo oooooooooooo
TEMECULA VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
BALANCE SHEET
SEPTEMBER 30, 1996
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash in checking - Bank of Commerce
Cash - Scholarship fund - GW
Cash - Money Market
Petty cash
Receivable from City of Temecula
Prepaid rent
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Office furniture & equipment
Less: accumulated depreciation
NET PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
23,401
118
11,375
200
40,000
2,455
72,633
(39,371)
$ 77,549
33,262
TOTAL ASSETS
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accounts payable
Payroll taxes payable
Accrued payroll
Deferred income
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES
EQUITY
Retained earnings, beginning
Net income for period
TOTAL EQUITY
$ 1,831
(259)
2,098
3,493
$ 57,985
45,662
$ 110,811
$ 7,164
103,647
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
$ 110,811
See accountant's compilation report
Winifred A. Samstag, Certified Public Accountant
Temecula, California
c,q N
,q, #
...--it
I
N
II
.m.#
A
oo
',q' II
t'~ II
II
If
II
N
N
N
0 II
0 H
c) If
II
II
u
0000
o II
0 II
r.- N
N
II
II
II
oo
O0
o II
0 ff
II
II
#
It
II
#
r~ II
~ H
I~ II
~ II
II
ff
N
II
II
II
#
II
c) ff
~ H
~ N
II
H
I!
~ 0
~ ~ o
~ ~ EO~ · ~
~ ~mO0~ ~ ~
0 O~o~ ~ ~
~ Z~~O ~
~,4 ~'~ v
v v
A
c~ II
m II
If
It
ff
N
II
0000
A
0 l
0 II
~ N
wl
l
N
It
N
#
oo
o
o N
o II
II
H
H
U
II
II
m'N
,~0
Iw o
0 o
Id
,,,d
O~
,4
,,-4
ul II
f-. ff
N
II
II
H
It
H
0000
o
0 II
o N
~ N
N
It
U
N
N
fi
O0
0 II
II
N
II
II
H
tl
II
ff
f~
"q' N
II
ff
H
ff
#
II
m.N
0 N
II
l
II
N
H
N
N
N
m. ll
O0
0
0 H
~ H
H
II
II
ff
#
H
~ o~o0o0o0o~0o O0~0ooomoooo
0 II
r'.. II
,,..#
#
#
0
DO~
0~
m~000
a:) II
~ H
~ N
#
II
,i,-( fi
r-,. N
0 II
N
l
N
II
,u'J. II
· ~ 0
,-4'00
0
~ oo~oooo0o~000o0oo0000~000
r~ N
a'~ II
~N
o H
fi
fi
I1
m II
0 N
0 N
u') fi
N
II
N
TEM~CULA VALLEy CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
BALANCE SHEET
FEBRUAR~ 28, 1997
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash in checking - Bank of Commerce
Cash in checking - Fallbrook Nat°l Bank
Cash - Scholarship fund - GW
Cash - Money Market
Petty cash
Prepaid rent
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS
PROPERTY AND EQUIPKENT
Office furniture & equipment
Less: accumulated depreciation
NET PROPERTY AND EQUIPKENT
TOTAL ASSETS
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Payroll ta~es payable
TOTAL CURR~NT LIABILITIES
EQUITY
R~tained earnings,
Net income (loss)
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
beginning
for period
TOTAL EQUITY
725
3,811
3,075
36,629
200
2,717
73,870
(39,371)
$ 3,346
$ 103,541
(25,231)
$ 47,157
34,499
81,656
$ 3,346
78,310
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
$ 81,656
See accountant's comp£1at£on report
Wlnifred A. Samstag, Certified Public Accountant
Temscul&, California
o~ I
i"' "" '"J '" i '" -"
J J J~J
..,., -..
--,-, .-, ...,o ool "*'~° "" ~'
0,,,I
(-4, - .-I C · C, 0 * *C.) * C , ~
m~ .= k C u,..~ O E :J e X O~ O0 E
J:l k,-t . . J.t . . . O , ,.cI 14 ~-~
:: ~ o
r', I fi
o I 'q'
~.1
I
i
I
I
I
fil I CO 1
I 0 I
I '-I
I .'11
I ffl I -..I
I I C
I I -,,I
I I
00000000
r400fflmO I 0 I 0
~ ~lm. I ql. I
I
!
0 0 I
o) II
0 I
I
I
¢~11
~110
I
1
1
I
m I ml
~11 o I
0
0
~ ~°°~°o°o°§°°°~°§~o°~°-°.°~°~°°o°o°i~."
I r,,I I
I I
I
I I
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
FUNDING REQUEST FY98
ATTACHMENTE
June 10,1997
Economic
Development
Corporation
[emecu/a l'~//er
Honomble City Coundl
CITY OF TEMECULA
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
Dear Councilmembers:
On behalf of the Board of Directors, the membership and staff of the Temecula Valley Economic
Development Corporation, I am pleased to present you with this summary report of our activities during
the 1996-97 fiscal year. While this past year has been a period of transition and challenge, I
am,nonetheless, proud of our accomplishments.
During the first six months, we undertook a significant effort to reorganize and stabilize the
administration of the TVEDC. We accomplished that; but in doing so our "pure" economic development
efforts were reduced by necessity. The charge given to our intedm Executive Director was explicitly to
focus more on the reorganization than on conventional economic development. We reasoned that a
short time spent on effective organizational redesign would, quite simply, make our economic
development efforts significantly better in the long run.
In the latter half of the year, our economic development efforts have increased. You will see in our
report that, even on a strained budget, the 'i'VEDC consistently represented itself and the Temecula
Valley as professional and accommodating to business. New ideas and new strategies continue to
emerge. Members are demonstrating a recommitment to our mission.
The TVEDC wants to thank the Council for its financial support this past year. We also want to thank
City staff for their cooperation, support, and understanding as we navigated some choppy waters.
The TVEDC is a group of people who look to the economic future of Temecula, and like what they see.
We remain adamant in our belief that successful economic development must spdng from a coalition of
all the stakeholders in the community - residents, businesses, government, schools.
Our new work program reflects that belief and a commitment to succeed. W'rth the City's continued
support we can work to create the kind of durable wealth and promote the Quality of Life that will give
Temecula the sustainable economy essential to achieving long term community prosperity. Again,
thank you for your long standing support. We are looking forward to demonstrating our continuing
improvement.
Very/truly yours,
.__
Thomas A. Ei~lem
Executive Director
Enclosure
Post Office Box 1388 · Temecula, CA 925934388 · Office 909/695-5130 · FAX 909/69~,-'3126
TEMECULA VALLEY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
SUMMARY OF
1996-97 ACTIVITIES
In accordance with the provisions delineated in Section 1 of the agreement
between the TVEDC and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula,
the TVEDC Board of Directors, committees, volunteers and staff undertook the
following activities:
WORKSHOPS - Three workshops/presentations were held this year. In the Fall,
the 'I'VEDC Expediting Committee, in collaboration with the City, hosted an
afternoon workshop addressing the City's permitting and regulatory procedures.
It was attended by about 30 individuals from the development community. Also
in October, the TVEDC hosted an economic development roundtable
discussion/open forum as part of a membership luncheon, attended by nearly 60
people. In January, the Temecula Valley Economic Development Corporation
presented Dr. John Husing discussing the Valley's economic outlook. Over 85
people attended.
BUSINESS ATTRACTION ('TRADE SHOWS) - The 'I'VEDC attended the WESCON,
NEPCON and MDM trade shows as part of the TeamCalifornia exhibit. 'I-VEDC
members and staff attended the Diamond Venture Forum; TVEDC staff
participated in the ranking and review of the Forum's participating
entrepreneurs.
BUSINESS ATTRACTION ('RECRUITMENT AND OUTREACH) - Business recruitment is
clearly the most public, the most noticeable, of economic development
programs, for it is always measured in tangibles such as new jobs, new
businesses, new construction, new taxes and the like. The inherent difficulty in
this measurement system is that business growth decisions rarely, if ever, neatly
correspond to contract reporting periods. This year's efforts may produce next
year's (or the year after that) activity. For 1996-97 the TVEDC can report a host
of activities and boast of a healthy economic outlook which can serve as
indicators of success. Perhaps the other tangibles can be reported next year.
The 'FVEDC's attraction efforts included:
1. Working with the City and the brokerage community to identify geographical
targets and industries where Quality of Life would play a key role in the
2. Implementing a new system of broker alerts and inquiry response.
Responding via introductory correspondence to over 475 new inquiries from
all sources.
a. 63 required additional simple follow-up ranging from telephone calls to
sending more detailed information.
b. 11 inquiries evolved into more extensive responses or bona fide
proposals where specific development data was provided.
c. 5 remain active - pending as of this date.
4. Additionally, 122 older files were closed/purged as non-responsive.
TVEDC staff hosting/conducting five individual prospect tours and luncheons
with company representatives. Two of these companies are still considering
Temecula in a near future decision process. Staff continues to work with
these companies.
6. Visiting the manufacturing plant of one of the prospects seeking a site. This
company remains interested in Temecula.
7. Responding to all appropriate California Trade and Commerce and Inland
Empire Economic Partnership proposals.
8. Cooperating with any and all agencies on creating economic enhancement
programs.
MARKETING - A TVEDC representative attended most community marketing
meetings. TVEDC representatives offered key suggestions relating to the
creation of concise, customized trade show distribution pieces, and developing a
San Diego Super Bowl tie-in. A Super Bowl committee has been formed by the
City; the distribution pieces will be developed by fall.
TVEDC undertook the "Who's Gonna Pay" campaign to enlighten the community
on the vital role played by business.
TVEDC only issued one newsletter this year, but timed its distribution to support
the passage of Measure C.
A two-part mailer was distributed discussing the value of both doing business in
Temecula and being a member of the 'I'VEDC (Slice of the Pie)
RETENTION & VISITATION - Business retention activities are critical to successful
economic development programs. This past year, working from available data,
over 175 businesses were assigned to committee members for visitation. For
various reasons (gone out of business, wrong address/phone, left town, decline
process. While the TVEDC did not achieve its target for visitation count, the
Retention Committee has been by far the most active and reliable in this past
year. With a core of dedicated participants, the committee met regularly and
undertook its tasks in a highly professional manner. The Retention Committee
added the executive director of the Chamber of Commerce and invited the
President of the Southwest Riverside County Manufacturer's Council to
participate in developing a new business welcoming process. While referred to
as a "welcoming" program, the intent is more accurately described as offering
resource and orientation support and assistance to those businesses that are in
the transition period between the time they select Temecula and when they
actually get into operation. This effort is ready to implement.
The Retention Committee completed:
1. a compilation of past visitation data;
2. developing a new, comprehensive visitation survey instrument;
3. developing a coordinated data matrix;
4. developing and assembling comprehensive packets to be presented at
business visitations; and
5. re-ranking target list of businesses based on new business inventory
assembled by the City.
As intended, our visitations did reveal certain concerns and discontent. In every
case we followed up with appropriate action. Perhaps the most notable instance
involved a company contemplating leaving Temecula due to an old issue with
former City employees. This issue was passed onto the City Manager who
responded immediately to successfully resolve the issue. The process worked
very well in this case.
EXPEDITING - Fortunately, the Expediting Committee was barely visible this year
with the notable exception of the workshop presented in the Fall. Over the
course of the year, a few (less than five) issues emerged, but they were
effectively resolved by individual intervention. As part of the expediting and
facilitating mission, TVEDC representatives sat on the sign ordinance comment
panel, and the Industrial Committee played an advocacy role in the debate over
Developer Impact Fees.
SPECIAL PROGRAMS - Between and among the focused economic development
tasks undertaken, 'I'VEDC engages in and/or responds to a number of other
projects and activities. This past year, the TVEDC:
Began investigating a loan subsidy program that could be established as a
financial incentive. This program, if implemented, will be in lieu of a micro-
loan program, and will not be a "last resort" program. It will be an incentive
program for preferred qualified business.
Represented the Temecula area at the California Incubator Conference,
CALED Conference and the California Downtown Association annual
conference.
Hosted the Riverside Community College International Trade representative
through October. The reorganization caused a suspension of service; this
can be reviewed in the upcoming year.
4. Restablished/edited the TVEDC Website.
5. Updated and revised the Community Profile.
6. Assisted in distribution of the completed CD-Rom. The City staff stepped in
and assumed the lead role on the final production.
7. Gave a public presentation to the Lion's Club of Temecula.
8. Staffed a TVEDC booth at the SWRC Manufacturer's Council Business Expo.
9. Regularly attended the monthly meetings of and cooperated with the SWRC
Manufacturing Council.
10. Initiated discussions with Mt. San Jacinto Community College on developing
a specialized curriculum for essential tool and die training.
11. Concluded a telemarketing effort begun in the prior year. Effort focused on
expanded name recognition among professional real estate companies and
real estate divisions of Southern California major employers.
The 'I'VEDC, overall, effectively restructured itself to meet the challenges of
competitive economic development. For the year just ending, and the year just
beginning, the 'I'VEDC achieved its goals in quality and performance, even if
identified task quantities were sometimes below expectations.
Temecula Valley Economic Development Corporation
1997-98 Work Plan and Operating Budget
At the regular meeting of the Board of Directors, held April 23, 1997, the
attached work plan and operating budget for the year 1997-98 was unanimously
approved. This program, budget and accompanying request for City support is a
departure from past practice in a couple of aspects.
First, this work program reflects a commitment not just to job creation and/or
development, but rather, to building long term community and economic
prosperity. This plan is not oriented to growth, but rather, it is focused on
developing all of Temecula's wealth - human, social, natural and financial. It is
a program designed to serve the needs of today's Temecula without
compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. The
communities that prosper will be those that develop strategies to create resilient
local economies that make the unique strengths of their people and their place a
source of competitive advantage. This program is the beginning of just such a
strategy.
Second, this is a funding request for a program, not an organization. The
TVEDC seeks funding to pursue the economic development programs that
benefit the community without the encumbrance of member recruitment. TVEDC
has a loyal core of members and their contributions are reflected in our budget.
If that membership grows, however, the TVEDC is prepared to return a
percentage of that extra income to the City; this allows us to keep an
uncompromising eye on the economic development goals.
Economic development programs are people intensive. Hence, the TVEDC
seeks expanding its staff by using a contract employee 30 hours per week for 40
weeks over the year. This position will cost $28,800. In 1996-97, the City of
Temecula appropriated $71,400 for the TVEDC (but allocated only $61,400).
The TVEDC seeks to increase the City support by $18,600 to $90,000. That
increase will go to offset part of that contract position.
The four goals each focus on enhancement for Temecula's residents. They can
accommodate a natural growth, but growth is not the goal. The strategies build
on and refine programs that have a history of being effective. The tasks are
results driven and can be accomplished through the conscientious collaboration
of the City and our members.
The economy of Temecula as a whole depends upon the success of its many
parts, constituencies and agencies. Through our combined efforts the City of
Temecula and TVEDC can create an environment that promotes
entrepreneurship, innovation, and business and community responsibility by
marshalling local resources to address economic need.
GOALS
GOAL I Increase The Number Of Jobs Available To Temecula
Residents To Accommodate Population Growth Plus 1%.
Measurement: Second quarter 1996 show 18,503 jobs and a population of
44,000, a ratio of one job to every 2.38 residents. Our goal is to increase jobs
that will both accommodate growth as well as reduce the ratio by 1%. Data
received from State of California.
GOAL II Preserve Annual Per Capita Wage/Salary; If Feasible, Seek
1% Increase.
Measurement: Second quarter 1996 shows a per capita income of $9,917. Our
goal is to ensure that figure does not decrease annually. We shall put forth
efforts to increase by 1%. Data received from State of California.
GOAL III. Reduce Number Of Residents Commuting Long Distances
(45 Minutes Each Way) By 3%.
Measurement: 1994 labor survey and a special survey prepared for residential
circulation.
GOAL IV, Develop Enhanced Regional Collaboration For Economic
Development; Expand Scope And Vision Of The EDC.
Measurement: Participation, involvement, and increases in basic community
wealth indices such as job growth, local wages, unemployment, technology
transfer, educational achievement, new development, and the like.
STRATEGIES
A. BUSINESS ASSISTANCE
· Workshops
· Expediting/Regulatory Review
· Media/Press Relations
· Resource Development
B. BUSINESS RETENTION
· Visitation
· Intervention
· Resource Development
C. BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT/ENHANCEMENT
· Expansion
· Start-ups
· Attraction/Recruitment
D. COMMUNITY/OUTREACH AND COLLABORATION
Eo
· Community Outreach/Information Dissemination
· Interagency/Inter-Community Relations
· Promotions/Public Relations/Media Campaigns
· Member Relations
EDUCATION · Accessibility
· Curriculum Development
· Training/Employment Links
TASKS/ACTIONS
A. BUSINESS ASSISTANCE
1. Conduct four workshops annually on timely issues.
2. Periodic reviews of regulatory provisions to identify obstacles to
economic growth.
3. Prepare and issue media/press releases as appropriate.
4. Develop and maintain a business resource user library at the TVEDC
office.
5. Initiate an inter-business referral network.
6. Solicit volunteer professionals to serve on ad hoc advisory task forces
assembled to assist troubled/struggling businesses.
B. BUSINESS RETENTION
7. Conduct 120 business visits. Conduct surveys, distribute resource
materials.
8. Host individual lunches for the CEOs of Temecula's top 20 private
employers.
9. Mobilize expediting teams to assist businesses with regulatory
processes.
10. Assemble and train volunteers to respond as a Red Team.
11. Develop and disseminate a financial resource directory.
12.
Develop and disseminate a directory of public/quasi-public agencies
offering a general profile of the agency and a comprehensive inventory
and description of the programs offered by each agency.
C. BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT/ENHANCEMENT
13.
Develop a series of target lists for attraction efforts. Focus will include
electronics, health related (bio, mdm, etc.) technology, pastics.
Cluster development will be evaluated/formulated.
14.
Make mail and personal contact with CEOs of target list, and with
unsolicited inquiries, trade show contacts and magazine advertising
responses.
15. Coordinate visitations to target companies (Business Attraction
Teams).
16. Coordinate visits by company representatives to include (as
reasonable and appropriate) lunches, tours, golf outings, and the like.
17.
Develop and distribute to active prospects resource materials
including funding programs, SBDC programs, regulatory compliance,
and other resources.
18.
Design and distribute to CEOs business focused attraction products
that differentiate Temecula from the countless other communities
issuing slick marketing materials.
19. Evaluate and design financial incentive programs that could be
implemented locally.
20. Conduct mail survey of Temecula residents to gain new data on labor
force commute trends.
21. Maintain useable, current data relevant to business decision makers.
22. Design, develop, and maintain a comprehensive building and property
directory and area business directory.
23. Design and implement a bonus incentive program to reward persons
who Assist in Temecula's acquiring a new enterprise.
24. Attend trade shows as appropriate; custom design handout materials;
follow-up on leads.
COMMUNITY OUTREACH AND COLLABORATION
25. Conduct four member luncheons.
26. Maintain memberships/seats/participatory relationships with
community groups and area governments.
27. Print/issue four newsletters annually.
28. Design and offer advertising space on the TVEDC web site.
Eo
29. Participate in the City of Temecula's marketing effort as is necessary
and appropriate.
30. Assist, on a case-by-case basis, with collaborative promotions, public
relations and media campaigns.
31. Implement a community outreach/information dissemination/action
alert system on issues of relevance to economic development.
32. Public presentations/image enhancement.
33. Design and implement new performance measures based on overall
community standards.
EDUCATION
Team with all area educators to expand the number and type of
educational opportunities at local/neighborhood sites.
Team with area educators to develop special curricula expressly to fill
an identified void in the business community.
Maintain web site and e:mail system, including regional/state links.
Coordinate with local industry to identify labor/education needs and
current training expertise for cross-use (business to business training).
Seek appropriate foundation grants to purchase new/expanded
computer equipment for training use.
Survey local community to develop base of expertise of local active
and
retired professionals; formulate outline to utilize these professionals in
training/teaching programs.
Develop and maintain a list of technical assistance providers and
training opportunities.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
'['VEDC
1997-1998 PROPOSED OPERATING BUDGET SUMMARY
REVENUE
Memberships - Cash
City Contract
County Contribution
Special Event Revenue (Golf) [Net]
Quarterly Luncheons
Advertising
Interest Income
Miscellaneous Revenue
TOTAL 1997-98 REVENUE
50,000
90,000
5,000
16,000
3,800
700
400
100
166,000
EXPENSES
PERSONNEL SERVICES (3 Positions)
DIRECT OPERATING EXPENSE
DIRECT PROGRAM EXPENSE
EQUIPMENT EXPENSE
TOTAL 1997-98 BUDGET EXPENSE
126,000
28,500
9,000
2,500
166,000
5~30~97
1997-98 Proposed Budget
Page I
TEMECULA VALLEY FrLM COUNCIL
FUND]2qG REQUEST FY9$
ATTACHMENT F
Temecula Valley Film Council Business Plan
for Fiscal Year 1997-1998
Submitted by:
Jo Moulton
Mark A. & Mickie Evans
March 5, 1997
Board of Directors
Mark Evans, President
Sunny Pouison Thomas, Vice President
Carl Love, Secretary
Elaine Miller, Treasurer
Tim Miller, Legal Counsel
Jeff Comerchero
Brian Padberg
Dr. Fred Huber
Stephanie Cuip
Dick Rainey
Staff
Jo Moulton, Exec. Director
Mickie Evans, Office Administrator
TEMECULA VALLEY FILM COUNCIL
BUSINESS PLAN 1997/1998
1997 marks the fifth year of the Temecula Valley Film Counci!'s entry into the
competitive arena of t'dm commissions. State of the art theater screens are
proliferating everywhere as billions of dollars continue to be spent every year in
producing motion pictures, commercials, music videos and television shows.
Competition for lucrative production project dollars is intense.
Fortunately for Temecula, the Temecula Valley Film Council has positioned itself
creatively to have a chance at a slice of these lucrative dollars. By producing an
event that is normally within the realm of world capitals and destination places, the
film council's ambitious undertaking of its very own t'dm festival has succeeded in
creating a growing interest in the Temecula Valley as Hollywood's most attractive,
new geographically desirable t'dmmaking destination.
The Temecula Valley Film Council marketing and business plan for the new fiscal
year 1997-1998 will continue to focus on the following:
1. MARKETING
An aggressive campaign of direct personal calling along with direct mail and
indirect solicitation to attract the t'dm industry to Temecula. This includes:
Participation in I'dm industry related trade shows, specifically, Showbiz Expo
in June, 97 at the Los Angeles Convention Center, the Natpe Convention
in January'98 and AFM Market in March, 1998.
am
Advertising in selected issues of Daily Variety, The Hollywood Reporter,
Location Update, LA411 and the Hollywood Reporter Biu Book Directory.
Continued membership in the Association of Film Commissioners
(International)
~ 3RD ANNUAL TEMECULA VALLEY INTERNATIONAL
FILM FESTIVAL, a celebration of the imagination through filn~
In keeping with this year's festival slogan, the festival has expanded its
event programming by accepting aH film genres. The last two years, film
entries were limited to romantic comedies.
m
Be
o
A.
B.
C.
D.
ge
~ TEMEKU AWARDS.
This project is still in its preliminary stage. It is an awards/banquet event
specifically designed to honor and acknowledge broadcast, print and multi-
media professionals of the Inland Empire/Riverside County region. This is
non-maintream professionals' answer to established awards show like the
Oscars, the Emmy's, etc.
OIYTREACH
Hosting a familiarization tour. Location Scouts, Location Managers,
Producers, Directors, Cinematographers, Unit Managers, Writers, Travel
Editors, Location Magazine Editors, Trade Publication Editors (Daily
Variety, Hollywood Reporter, On Location, Location Update) will be invited
to preview Temecula as a poss'ble site for their feature film, television or
commercial projects. ~
Invite television shows to do taeir shows live in Temecula. On ratings
periods, networks like to do their shows on location just to be different and to
garner as much ratings points as possible. The Film Council is currently
working aggressively to convi£ce Ted Koppe!'s Nightline to do a Town HaH
Meeting type of show here in Temecula. Subject suggested is: "America's
Burgeoning 'Edge Cities'. Ter~ecula is a perfect example of the 'edge city"
phenomena.
Continue to organize t'dm indcstry related workshops. Invite industry
professionals like News Directors, Set Designers, Casting Directors, Special
Effects Specialists to talk on v~rious film/tv industry issues.
OPERATIONS
Continue to maintain a Locati, ms Library ( photos of various locations sites).
Update Production Guide/Sup ~ort Services Directory.
Update mailing list of contact ~ersons (location managers, producers,etc).
Produce a Film Council Newsletter, highlighting Temecula and surrounding
area's unique location sites, local film/video production crews, talent and
film council activities.
Continue to act as the focal point for all film related inquiries, production
and support service informatioa to the industry, education to local merchants
to the opportunities of servicing the film industry and to promote the
relocation of l"dm crews and flirt companies to the area to generate film
activity and new jobs.
e
BUDGET REQUEST FOR 1997/1998
Reprint of TVFC Prod. Guide/Location Postcards $6,000
Both the Production Guides and Location postcards have been the Film
Council's main marketing tools. The guide contains everything a producer,
director, unit manager or location scout needs to know about t'dming in
Temecula and surrounding areas. The guide needs updating yearly to keep
the information in a somewhat current state. The Location postcards are
distributed at trade shows.
Location Scout/Survey Services
$5,000
These dollars will be used mainly to cover expenses incurred during location
scouting trips for production companies. Average number of days for
location scouting per project is 3. Costs involve films (approx. rolls of 35mm
film used per scouting trip is 12, at 24 or 36 exposures per roll) film
developing and gasoline expenses. To date, the film council receives at least
18 location requests a month. These dollars will also be used to continue
building the Locations Library. Still panoramic photos, exterior and interior
photos of frequently requested location sites are maintained to service on the
spot requests by scouts and production managers.
Trade Shows
$10,000
These dollars will be used to pay towards expenses for attending ShowBiz
Expo'97 at the Los Angeles Convention Center, the Natpe Convention'98 and
AFM Market in March'98 at Loews, Santa Monica.
FAM Tour $2,000
Hosting expenses for a familiarization tour planned for October'97. Location
scouts, managers, producers, directors, writers, set designers, trade
publication editors, travel editors will be invited to preview Temecula as a
possible site for their feature film, television or commercial projects.
Print Media Advertising
$12,000
These dollars will be used to pay for advertising in selected issues of Daily
Variety, Hollywood Reporter, Location Update, Locations Magazine, selected
Film Festival programs/directories, LA411 and the Hollywood Reporter Biu
Book Directory.
TOTAL REQUEST $35,000
1997/1998
REV-ENUEg
1. Production Guide'98
2. Temecula Valley International Film Festival
3. Friends of the Festival Donations
4. Miscellaneous Fundraisers
5. City Funding (see attached budget)
EXPENDITURE~
BUDGET ESTIMATE
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Print Media Advertising
Trade Shows
FAM Tours/Location Scouting
Executive Director (Part time)
Prod./Services Directory/Location Postcards
Telephone
Postage
Insurance
AFCI Membership
Office Rent
Office Supplies
Electricity
TOTAL
TOTAL
NET
$4,000
$10,000
$3,000
$6,000
$35,000
$57,000
$15,000
$10,000
$5,000
$12,000
$5,000
$3,000
$1,200
$2,500
$500.00
Donated
Donated
Donated
$54,200
$2,800
.'.I! ,, __~., · ......... or for your Free Production Guide
........ ' 27645 jefferson Avenue, Suite ~04-A · Temecula, CA 92590
(~9) 699-6267
I ~I I I I I i ~I I
No permit fees, no red tape
Location scouting assistance · Great accommodations
super suppor~ services · Terrific California weather · Estate homes
Easy, fast access to Hollywood · Charming small towns, western towns
Picturesque wineries, lush vineyards · Lakes & streams, rolling hills
o Thoroughbred ranches, groves · Strip shopping centers
"Film friendly" community · Infinite variety...
' I I I" I ~ ,II!-' '
;..~, ~.,~ . ~. ,. _ .:~:~..,....~...~ ....~:~:~ ....
LOCATION:
Western Towns
Old Town Temecula
Movieland Frc~ntiertown
· ~..:. ~. .... ; ,:' .:
Calico Ghost Town
Pioneertown
Temecula Valley Film Council
Activity Report
for November/December, 1996
November 4 - November 22, 1996 Film Feature filming of"Whine Country"
Locations used were a residence in Bear Creek, Butterfield Square, Old Town
Jewelers, Spirited Sisters Trading Post, and Mount Palomar Winery
Area businesses used to provide various services were: Attraction Balloons,
Prime Equipment, Spano's Flying Adventures, Togo's Eatery, Comfort Inn,
Country Signs, Kinko's Copies, Potamus Press, Lucky's Supermarket, Fish
Exchange, Peony's Chinese Restaurant, Presto's Gourmet, Pam's Donuts,
Albertson's Supermarket, El Rancho Animal Hospital, Long's Drugs
Local residents hired to do production and engineering crew work - 15
Salary ranged from $600-$8,000.
Economic Impact for 11 days of filming in the area: $46,000
Producer/Director Joe Khoury is hoping to start post production work on the film
in January. He plans to enter the film at the film festival in September.
The Community Variety Show will be revived, with some changes.. Auditions
for hosts/talents will be Dec. 14-15, from 9am to 5pm at the Temecula Valley
Chamber of Commerce. (See Attached Press Release)
Film Feature filming of"What Comes Around", set to start 3rd week of
January. Locations being considered: Trailer Park on East Benton Road,
Gas Station on Washington St./Murdeta, Temecula Market on Front St.,
Via Vaquero Rd./De Luz Area.
Local connection: Script was written by Joe Hudon of Rancho News.
Joe Hudon submitted the script to Jo Moulton. Moulton gave it to a producer
who showed it to a Director.
Jo Moulton will be Line Producer and Assistant Director. Stacy Sievek has been
hired to do all the Cmffing/Grip work. A list of additional local crew has been
submitted to LA based director (Kevin Haasamd) for consideration. Auditions for
a major role and three supporting roles and extras are set for Dec. 14 and 15 at the
Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce.
Film Council Activity Report
Page 2
Estimated economic impact to Temecula for a 10 day shooting schedule is
$60,000. Other areas to be used for the film are Barstow and Coachella Valley.
Plans are now being formulated for the 1997 Film Festival. One great
development is the fact that Blockbuster Entertainment Group has selected the
Temecula Valley Int'l Film Festival as one of approx. 10 Film Festivals in the
country that the company will support with a monetary donation and publicity for
their participation in Blockbuster's newly formed annual Student Film Award
program. The winning student film fi-om each of these festivals will be submitted
to Bluckbuster where a panel of judges will choose one film for the company's
national award. We're told by Blockbuster Entertainment that Temecula is the
least known of the festivals asked to participate, but Blockbuster executives like
what they see happening in our festival and want to help us grow and gain national
attention. They have committed publicity support and the use of all Blockbuster
Video Stores south of Los Angeles as our Festival's Information/Ticket Outlet
Center.
We're kicking off the year with a fundraiser on January 25. Veteran Hollywood
sramman Loren Janes will be giving a three hour presentation on stunts at the CRC
Multi-Purpose Room. Discussions will include: what it takes to be a stunt person,
an hour behind the scenes footage of actual movie stunts being planned and
executed, and a question and answer session.
Locations Expo'97 at the Los Angeles Convention Center in March.. The Film
Council will be attending this big industry trade show to promote the 1997 Film
Festival, distribute the Call for Entry forms to attending producers and directors,
unveil the 1997 Festival Poster in addition to giving out the Film Council
production guides and location postcards.
Miko Food Corporation/Avocado Grove commercial shoot last October 21-24 in
the De Luz area Filming of the commercial took three days. They brought in
equipment and crew fxom Los Angeles. Still, according to their Production
Coordinator, Ms. Misao, the production company managed to spend about
$2,500 between accommodations, heavy equipmere rental, location rental, food
and some incidental purchases.
TEMECULA VALLEY FILM COUNCIL
27645 Jefferson Ave., Suite 104A. Temecula, CA 92590 (909) 699-6267 FAX (909) 308-1414
Film Council Activity Report
for December'96/January, 1997
Currently in pre-production phase for "Community Variety Show (a flee-flowing
format in the classic tradition of magazine-variety shows, the Community Variety
Show will have three main segments: Community News & Trends Update, the
Quiz Challenge and Celebrity/Talent Spotlight). Auditions were held last Dec.
14/15 for local talents. Big turn-out. Audition hopefuls came from as far as Apple
Valley and as diverse as Mark Lohman (Riverside Sheriffs Spokeman) and Linda
Modok, a Temecula housewife!!. Final selection will be January 15.
Campaign to generate sponsorships start January 13. Production is scheduled
for Saturday, March 15. Production staff will be 100% local. Technical crew will
be a combination out of area and obom 70% local.
TCI-cable has committed a Monday airing schedule, 7:00-8:00PM.
If everything goes as planned, this show should be able to generate a decent
monthly funding support for the film council.
Film Council Fundraiser- An Evening with Veteran Hollywood Stuntman, Loren
Janes" is all set for January 25, 7:00-10:00pm. at the CRC Auditotium. Tickets
are $7, adults and $5, children, students and children.
Filming of "What Comes Around" might be pushed back to February.
Producers have not made a final decision as to where exactly their main location
will be but for sure, Temecula is at least going to have no less than 10 filming days
of the movie's 30-day shooting schedule. Resumes from local residents have been
submitted for consideration.
2 Location surveys have been done by the producers of "Big Bass Bonanza"
Tentative shooting schedule is set for March.
Location Expo (Feb.7-9, LA Convention Center) - The film council will attend
the festival via Inland Empire Film Commission.
Film Festival -- in early stages of getting the sponsorship package all finalized.
Call for entries should be ready for mailing by first week of March.
TEMECULA VALLEY FILM COUNCIL
27645 Jefferson Ave., Suite 104A, Temecula, CA 92590 (909) 699-6267 FAX (909) 398-1414
Film Council Activity Report
January - February 1997
Two Los Angeles Times (Calendar/January 12 issue) articles on Film Festivals
gave our Temecula Valley Int'l Film Festival special mention. From these
articles, the Film Council received numerous inquiries about the festival plus about
52 (to date) requests for Festival Call For Entry Forms. This is pretty good news
considering our call for entry forms for 1997 are not even printed yet.
Festival Sponsorship packets meanwhile, are done and are finally at the hands
of our Festival sponsor development people (Catherine Aron & Zenda Parker of
BRG). We hope they will be able to increase sponsorship participation this year.
The Community Variety Show received its first major sponsor commitment from
Pechanga Entertainment Center. If everything goes as planned, taping of the first
four shows is scheduled for March 23. Edited shows are scheduled for broadcast
on TCI Cable -Ch.8 on Mondays, 7:00-8:00pm starting Apr. 14, 21, 28 & May 5
The Community Variety Show is a family entertainment show offering viewers not
only the most comprehensive community news and information but also the most
diverse and complete community based entertainment program. The show will be
produced network style-live on tape, on location, multiple camera format with
rotating hosts, performing talents, competing schools and specials guests. It will
be staffed by 90% local and 10% out of area crew.
Location Surveys:
a. Steve Skolnick scouted the area for a Subaru Jeep commercial.
Location selected was the Santa Rosa Plateau. Permission to film Feb. 10-
12 was granted by the Conservancy. but postponed due to
rainy/foggy/low clouds weather. No new date has been set due to star's
busy schedule 0Vici Gibson is Subam's spokeperson in Japan and was
available only Feb. 10-12). This commercial production involves a crew
of 60, 5 production vehicles, and 6 picture cars.
b. Location surveys for a Movie of the Week "With Savage Intent", an
independent feature, "Presumed Guilty" and for a documentary, "Pain Free
America" Properties in Temecula and Anza are being considered.
Location Expo'97 at the LA Convention Center. The Film Council shared a large
booth with the Inland Empire Film Commission. and California Film Commission.
Distributed location postcards, production guides and Chamber of Commerce
Visitors Guide/Wine Country brochures. IEFC and CFC will share their
leads/contact names with the Film Council.
Temecula Valley Film Council
27645 Jefferson Ave. Suite 104A
Temecula, CA 92590
Financial Statement
June 1,1996 - May 31, 1997
Account Name
Friends of the Festival
Production Guide
Film Festival
City Funding
Miscellaneous Fundraisers
In Kind Sponsors (Festival)
TOTAL REVENUE
Budget Estimate
$ 3000.00
$ 40OO.O0
$10000.00
$30000. O0
$ 6OOO.OO
Actual Revenue
$ 540.0O
$ 1714.89
$47960.51
$30000.0O
$ 406.6O
$88000.00
$168622.00
EXPENSES
Account Name
Insurance
Telephone
Mail/Postage
Advertising
Dues (AFCI Membership)
Location Scouting Expense
Trade Shows
Production Guide/Postcards
Film Festival ~,c~ t~c -)
Trade/In-Kind Services(Film Fest)
Priming/Collateral Materials
Prof. Services/Consultant Fees
Commissions
TOTAL EXPENSES
Budget Estimate
$ 2500.00
$ 3000.00
$ 1200.00
$15000.00
$ 500.00
$ 5000.00
$10000.00
$ 5000.00
$68OOO.0O
$15000.00
$12000.00
Actual Expenses
$ 3330.35
$ 1705.78
$ 880.41
$ 3761.03
$ 500.00
$ 7329.35
$ 3069.00
$ 6340.00
$16314.37
$88000.00
$12805.64
$13500.00
$ 3393.42
$160929.35
NET INCOME $ 7692.65
Trade/In-Kind Services for 1996 Temecula Valley int'! Film Festival
Sponsor Name
The Mission Inn
The Press Enterprise
The Californian
TCI Cablevision
Inland Empire Business Journal
KOLA 99.9
Embassy Suites
Temecula Creek Inn
KRTM 88.9
Maurice Printers
Innovative Images
CR&R Incorporated
Tower Piaza/Layton BeHing & Associates
Palm P!aza/CB Commercial
Code 4 Protective Services
GC Graphics & Printing
Limelight
Design Dimensions
$Value of Sponsorship
$10,000
$5,000
$5,000
$10,000
$5,000
$10,000
$1,500
$1,500
$5,00O
$1,500
$2,500
$1,000
$10,000
$5,o00
$2,500
$2,500
$5,00O
$5,000
TOTAL IN KINDfFRADE $88,000
ITEMs-.19
APPRO'~~"-'
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF F~.N~E~
CITY MANAGER '~,?~_y~.
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
City Council/City Manager
Gary Thornhill, Community Development Director~
DATE:
June 10, 1997
SUBJECT:
Appeal of the Planning Commission's Approval of Planning Application No. PA96-
0345 (Development Plan) - Shell automobile service station, car wash, convenience
mart, and a Kentucky Fried Chicken fast food restaurant with drive through service,
at the southwest corner of Margarita Road and Yukon, within the Palomar Village
Shopping Center
Prepared By:
Carole Donahoe, Project Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Commission recommends the City Council:
1. Adopt the Negative Declaration for Planning Application No. PA96-0345;
2. Adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for Planning Application No. PA96-0345;
3. Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 97-
A RESOLUTION OF THE ci'rY COUNCIL OF THE CiTY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING PLANNING APPMCATION NO. PA96-0345 (DEVELOPMENT PLAN -
APPEAL), UPHOLDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION APPROVE
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA96-0~ (DEVELOPMENT PLAN) TO DESIGN
AND CONSTRUCT A 648 SQUARE FOOT AUTOMATED CAR WASH, A 875
SQUARE FOOT CONVENIENCE MART (WITHOUT ALCOHOUC BEVERAGE
SALES), AND A 1,645 SQUARE FOOT FAST FOOD RESTAURANT WITH DRIVE-
THROUGH SERVICE ON 0.794 ACRES LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST
CORNER OF MARGARITA ROAD AND YUKON, WITHIN THE PALOMAR
VILLAGE SHOPPING CENTER.
R:',STAFFRPT%345PA96.CC] 6/3/97 dwh 1
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This project is the construction and operation of an automobile service station with a 648
square foot automated car wash, an 875 square foot convenience mart (without alcoholic
beverage sales) and a 1,645 square foot fast food restaurant with drive-through service on
0.794 acres located at the southwest corner of Margarita Road and Yukon Road, within the
Palomar Village Shopping Center. All uses are expected to operate seven (7) days per week.
The service station was approved by the Planning Commission to operate from 5 a.m. to
midnight; the car wash operation shall be limited to 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.; and the fast food
restaurant will operate 6:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.
BACKGROUND
Land Use
According to the Development Code's Schedule of Permitted Uses automobile service stations
with or without an automated car wash are permitted in the Community Commercial zone.
Grocery stores are also a permitted use, which would allow the convenience mart without the
sale of alcoholic beverages. The Director of Community Development determined that the KFC
fast food restaurant with drive-through service is incidental to the main use of the site as an
automobile service station, and is therefore also a permitted use. The development plan
proposes construction under 10,000 square feet.
Public Interest
The applicant complied with the Planning Director's request for supplemental noticing of intent
to file a project application, as well as project noticing requirements in accordance with State
law. Staff received inquiries from adjacent and nearby residents. Staff met with the Villages
homeowners at an evening meeting at the home of David Micheal. Staff also met several times
with Frank Wagnon, whose property is across Yukon Road, and kept him up-to-date on the
series of revisions that occurred with the project.
Site Design
Upon review of the initial submittal, staff identified several areas of concern. The applicant
made major revisions to the development plan to address these concerns, to achieve
compatibility with surrounding uses, and to comply with the requirements of the Development
Code.
The applicant reduced the size of the car wash and changed its location to the
southernmost portion of the site, more than 200 feet from any residential district.
The applicant provided landscaping adjacent to the car wash, along both sides of the
drive-through aisle and within the parking areas. He agreed to enhance the landscaping
within the existing 50 foot wide easement along Margarita Road, and to provide an
approximately 33 foot wide bermed landscaped area with dense shrubbery along the
northern perimeter. These measures will effectively screen the trash enclosure, catch
any debris prior to routine cleanup, and buffer the project from residential uses across
both Yukon and Margarita Road.
The applicant modified the aisle widths to address concerns regarding internal
circulation.
R:\STAFFRPTLM5PA96.CC1 613/97 dwh 2
Conditions of approval insure compliance with Ordinance No. 655 regarding light
pollution, Americans with Disabilities Act requirements for handicapped accessibility,
and compliance with the City's Sign Ordinance.
The project is conditioned to use colors compatible with existing colors within the
Palomar Village Shopping Center.
The Planning Director determined that the project, with reciprocal use of parking spaces and
drive aisles with the other tenants within the shopping center, meets parking requirements of
the Development Code. The Planning Director also determined that adequate stacking spaces
are provided for the modified "express" menu offered by KFC. Eight (8) residents spoke in
opposition to the project; minutes of the Director's Hearing is Attachment 3. The application
was approved by the Planning Director on March 13, 1997 with amendments to the conditions
of approval. The applicant agreed to construct a decorative block wall and cluster landscaping
along the north side of the project.
Appeal to the Planning Commission
An appeal to the Planning Commission was filed on March 25, 1997 by Planning Commissioner
Marcia Slaven. Commissioner Slaven stated that she had a number of concerns with the
design of the project. Her major concerns included the proposed 24-hour operation of the
service station, the off-site illumination from the canopy lighting, and the need for an adequate
landscape buffer on the north side of the project site. The Commission heard the appeal on
April 7, 1997. Draft minutes are included in Attachment 4. Fourteen (14) residents spoke in
opposition to the project and staff received eight (8) written letters of opposition. The appeal
was denied and the Director's approval was upheld by a 3-2 vote with amendments to the
conditions of approval. The Commission required that the service station and fuel deliveries be
limited to 5 a.m. to midnight, that acoustical impacts to adjacent properties not exceed ambient
noise levels, that the applicant install a catch basin to trap all ohsire waste products, and that
no light spillage occur beyond the boundaries of the project site.
Appeal to the City Council
An appeal to the City Council was filed May 6, 1997 by Mr. David Micheal, President of the
Villages Homeowners Association (see Attachment 2). Mr. Micheal cited concerns regarding
traffic, noise, light, hazardous materials and safety. He provides three (3) alternatives to the
project:
1)
2)
3)
To deny the automobile service station and carwash and replace them with another
business.
To eliminate the carwash portion of the project and relocate the service station away
from residential uses
To swap land uses with one along Rancho California Road, such as Jiffy Lube, in order
to locate automobile service and car wash more appropriately on a major street.
Mr. Micheal asserts that the Environmental Study performed for the project by staff and the
Negative Declaration adopted by the Planning Commission is not sufficient. He requests a
complete Environmental Impact Report be prepared for the project.
R:\STAb"FRP'T~ISPA96.CC1 6/3/9"/dwh 3
Recluest for Information
The appellant claims that public information was withheld, including environmental, carwash,
and light studies. Mr. Micheal first requested information at the Villages Homeowners
Association meeting. Items on his list were delivered to his home within one week. Mr.
Micheal further requested traffic studies for the shopping center from staff after the Director's
Hearing. However, a search of files in Planning, Public Works and the City Clerk's office were
unsuccessful at locating a traffic study prepared for Riverside County when the center was
approved in 1988. Staff offered Mr. Micheal copies of the General Plan and the General Plan
Environmental Impact Report as an alternative because these documents would address his
concerns with cumulative impacts of all development in this vicinity. In preparation for the
Commission meeting, the applicant submitted an additional light study showing various
illumination levels generated by the project. Prior to the filing of an appeal to the City Council,
Mr. Micheal formally requested that the City Clerk copy the entire Planning casefile. This
request was completed within three (3) days. To staff's knowledge all available information
has been provided to Mr. Micheal.
DISCUSSION
The issues raised in the appeal include the following:
Traffic on Yukon Road
Appellant's Statement: Yukon Road is basically a residential access street.
Supplemental Information:
According to the Public Works Department, Yukon was designed
as an "industrial collector" roadway. Having a 78-foot right-of-
way width, Yukon is larger than a standard collector roadway (66-
foot) and already carries the truck traffic that services the Palomar
Village Shopping Center.
Signalization
Appellant's Statement:
The intersection of Yukon Road and Margarita Road should be
signalized as a result of this project.
Supplemental Information:
Noise
According to the Public Works Department, the traffic generated
by the project is anticipated at below the 5% allowable range of
additional impact as noted in the City's General Plan. The City
normally determines when an intersection needs signalization
based upon warrants. The Palomar Village Shopping Center has
contributed its fair share of traffic signal mitigation fees.
Appellant's Statement:
residences.
Noise levels generated by the project will impact adjacent
R:\STAFFRPT~5PA96.CC1 6/3/97 dwh 4
Supplemental Information:
[.ights
Appellant's Statement:
Supplemental Information:
Hazardous Materials
Appellant's Statement:
Supplemental Information:
Children
Appellant'is Statement:
Supplemental Information:
The site is within an existing commercial shopping center near the
intersection of two arterials, Rancho California Road and
Margarita Road. The 60 and 65 dB noise contours for Margarita
Road are found onsite. The applicant has been conditioned not to
impact adjacent residences with noise in excess of ambient levels
per the City's General Plan. Based upon roadway noise contours
and studies performed by Colia Acoustical Consultants dated April
11, 1991 it is anticipated that the project will meet this
requirement.
Light and glare generated by the project will have an impact on
nearby residences.
Staff had asked the applicant to address this same concern at the
Development Review Committee meeting. With the assistance of
the City's Chief Building Official the applicant modified the design
of the station canopy lighting in order to focus illumination away
from property lines while providing a safe environment. He will
provide recessed light fixtures, lower the height of the canopy and
modify the canopy edge.
We want to protect the wash and citizens with adjoining
homesites.
The operation of the automobile service station will be regulated
by the County Environmental Health Department and their division
for hazardous materials. Additionally, the project is conditioned
to meet federal requirements for National Pollutants Discharge
Elimination System, and in accordance with NPDES best
management practices, shall install a catch basin to trap all onsite
waste products.
The safety of children attending nearby schools is imperiled
because their travel to school would conflict with the vehicular
traffic generated by the project.
According to the Temecula Unified School District, children in the
Villages subdivision will attend Temecula Elementary, Margarita
Middle School and will attend Chaparral High School in August
and will travel in a northwesterly direction. Children living north
of La Serena attend Rancho Elementary, Margarita Middle School
and Chaparral High School and would travel west, east or north.
Children in the Temeku Hills project area are bussed to Vintage
Hills Elementary and Temecula Middle School.
R:\STAFF~SPA96.CC! 6/3/97 dwh 5
Attachments:
4.
5.
6.
7.
City Council Resolution - Page 7
Exhibit A. Conditions of Approval - Page 12
Appeal Application from David Micheal- Page 13
Minutes of the Director's Hearing of March 13, 1997 - Page 14
Draft Minutes of the Planning Commission Hearing of April 7, 1997 - Page 15
Planning Commission Staff Report dated April 7, 1997 - Page 16
Letters in Opposition - Page 17
Site Plan Exhibit - Page 18
R:\STAFFR.PTk345PA96.CCI 6/3197 dwh 6
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
RESOLUTION NO. 97-
R:\STAFFRPTk345PA96.CC1 613197 dwh 7
ATTACHlVIENT NO. 1
RESOLUTION NO. 97-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA96-0345 {DEVELOPMENT PLAN
- APPEAL), UPHOLDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION TO
APPROVE PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA96-0345 {DEVELOPMENT PLAN)
TO DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT A 648 SQUARE FOOT AUTOMATED CAR
WASH, A 875 SQUARE FOOT CONVENIENCE MART {WITHOUT ALCOHOLIC
BEVERAGE SALES), AND A 1,645 SQUARE FOOT FAST FOOD RESTAURANT
WITH DRIVE-THROUGH SERVICE ON 0.794 ACRES LOCATED AT THE
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF MARGARITA ROAD AND YUKON, WITHIN THE
PALOMAR VILLAGE SHOPPING CENTER, AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S
PARCEL NO. 921-700-017.
WHEREAS, Nick Goyal filed Planning Application No. PA96-0345 (Development
Plan) in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code;
WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PA96-0345 (Development Plan) was processed
in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Community Development Director considered Planning Application
No. PA96-0345 (Development Plan) on March 13, 1997 at a duly noticed public hearing as
prescribed by law, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in
support or opposition;
WHEREAS, the Community Development Director approved Planning Application
No. PA96-0345 (Development Plan) with revised Conditions of Approval on March 13, 1997;
WHEREAS, Planning Commissioner Marcia Slaven notified the Community
Development Department in writing on March 25, 1997 of her desire for Planning
Application No. PA96-0345 (Development Plan) to be reviewed and considered by the
Planning Commission;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No.
PA96-0345 (Development Plan) on April 7, 1997, at which time interested persons had an
opportunity to testify either in support of or opposition to the previously approved project;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after reviewing the staff report, receiving the
applicant's presentation, and hearing all public testimony upheld the decision of the
Community Development Director and added additional conditions of approval on Planning
Application No. PA96-0345 (Development Plan) to protect the surrounding community;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 97-007 on April 21,
1997;
R:\STAFFRFI'~SPA96.CCI 6/3/97 dwh 8
WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PA96-0345 (Development Plan - Appeal) was
filed May 6, 1997;
WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing pertaining to Planning
Application No. PA96-0345 (Development Plan - Appeal) on June 10, 1997, at which time
interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support of or opposition to the
previously approved project;
WHEREAS, the City Council received a copy of the Commission proceedings and
Staff Report regarding Planning Application No. PA96-0345;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1.
findings; to wit:
Findings. That the Temecula City Council hereby makes the following
A. That the proposed commercial land use is appropriately located within a
Community Commercial Zoning District that is part of the Palomar Village Shopping Center;
B. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula
and with all applicable requirements of State Law and other ordinances of the City. The
project is consistent with all City Ordinances including: the City's Development Code,
Ordinance No. 655 0Vlt. Palomar Lighting Ordinance), and the City's Water Efficient
Landscaping provisions;
C. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the
public health, safety, and general welfare. The project as proposed complies with all City
Ordinances and meets the standards adopted by the City of Temecula designed for the
protection of the public health, safety and welfare;
surrounding area;
That the design and layout of the facility minimize its impact on the
E. That to ensure the facility's compatibility with the surrounding area, the
following items need to be addressed in the project's design and the Conditions of Approval:
times for fuel deliveries;
Limiting the hours of operation for the service station and the
2. Preventing off-site light spillage from under the pump canopy;
Enhancing the screening and landscaping along the northern
portion of the site;
R:\STAFFRPTX345PA96.CCI 6/3197 dwh 9
4. Requiring appropriate methods to prevent fuel spills and
contaminated urban runoff from reaching area storm drains and stream channels; and,
service car wash.
Reducing the potential noise impacts from the proposed self-
F. That an Initial Study was prepared for the project and it has been
determined that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the
environment, these effects are not considered to be significant due to mitigation measures
contained in the project design and in the Conditions of Approval added to the project.
G.. That the project will not result in an impact to endangered, threatened or
rare species or their habitats, including but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals and
birds. The project site has been previously disturbed and graded, and street scape installed on
site. There are no native species of plants, no unique, rare, threatened or endangered species
of plants, no native vegetation on or adjacent to the site. Further, there is no any indication
that any wildlife species exist, or that the site serves as a migration corridor.
Section 2. Environmental Compliance. An Initial Study prepared for this project
indicates that although the proposed project could have a significant impact on the
environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures
described in the Conditions of Approval have been added to the project, and a Negative
Declaration, therefore, is hereby granted. A De Minimus Impact finding can be made for this
project.
Section 3. Approval The City Council hereby upholds the decision of the Planning
Commission and conditionally approves Planning Application No. PA96-0345 (Development
Plan) subject to the Conditions of Approval contained in Attachment A.
Section 4. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTEl) this 10th day of June, 1997.
Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
R:[STAFFRPT~SPA96.CCI 613/97 dwh 1 0
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) s$
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Resolution No. 97-m was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula
at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 10th day of June, 1997 by the following vote, to wit:
AYES'
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
June S. Greek, CMC
City Clerk
R:\STAFFRF'rk345PA96.CCI 6/3/97 dwh 1 1
EXHIBIT A
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
R:\STAFFRPTk345PA96.CCI 6/3197 dwh 1 2
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Revised April 21. 1997
Planning Application No. PA96-0345 (Development Plan)
Project Description: To construct and operate a Shell automobile service station with
a 648 square foot automated car wash, a 875 square foot convenience mart {without
alcoholic beverage sales) and a Kentucky Fried Chicken 1,645 square foot fast food
restaurant with drive-through service. All uses shall operate seven (7) days per week.
The service station is proposed to operate from (; a.m. to ,,,;d~;ght 24-hours from 5
a.m. to midnight; the car wash operation shall be limited to 7 a.m. to 10 p.m.; and the
fast-food restaurant shall operate 6 a.m. to 10 p.m.
(Amended by the Planning Director, March 13, 1997)
(Amended by the Planning Commission. April 7, 1997)
Assessor's Parcel No.
Approval Date:
Expiration Date:
921-700-017
March 13, 1937 April21, 1997
March 13, 19~ Apri121, 1999
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project
The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or
money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Seventy-Eight Dollars
($78.00) County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of
Determination for the Mitigated or Negative Declaration with a DeMinimus Finding
required under Public Resources Code Section 21108(b) and California Code of
Regulations Section 15075. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the
applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required
above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of
condition, Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c).
General Requirements
The developer/applicant shall indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless, the City
and any agency or instrumentality thereof, and/or any of its officers, employees and
agents from any and all claims, actions, or proceedings against the City, or any agency
or instrumentality thereof, or any of its officers, employees and agents, to attack, set
aside, void, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting from an approval of the City, or
any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body
including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning Planning Application
No. PA96-0345 (Development Plan). City shall promptly notify the developer/applicant
of any claim, action, or proceeding for which indemnification is sought and shall further
cooperate fully in the defense of the action.
This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall
become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction
R:\STAFFRPTk345PA96.pc¢ 6/3/97 ckd
o
contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period which is thereafter
diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated
by the approval.
All fuel deliveries shall be between the hours of 7 a.,~. to 7 p.,,,. 5 a.m. to midnight.
(Added by the Planning Commission, April 7, 1997)
(Amended by the Planning Commission, April 21, 1997)
Acoustic impacts to adjacent properties shall not exceed ambient noise levels per the
City's General Plan.
[Amended by the Planning Commission, April 7, 1997]
The development of the premises shall conform substantially with Exhibit "A" Site Plan
approved with Planning Application No. PA96-0345, or as amended by these conditions.
Prior to the issuance of a buEding permit, the applicant shall submit a site plan
showing the location of trash receptacles for all uses, subject to review and
approval by the Planning Manager.
(Added by the Planning Director, March 13, 1997)
Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit a site plan
showing the location, materials and elevation of a wall at the north side of the
project, subject to review and approval by the Planning Manager.
[Added by the Planning Director, March 13, 1997)
Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit a site plan
showing the location of a catch basin installed to trap a// on-site waste products.
[Amended by the Planning Commission, April 7, 1997)
The building shall conform substantially with Exhibit "BI," "B2," and "B3" Elevations;
Exhibit "C1," "C2," and "C3" Color Elevations; and Exhibit "D" Floor Plan, approved with
Planning Application No. PA96-0345 or as amended by these conditions.
Material Color
Building walls Cement plaster to match shopping center
Roof Metal to match shopping center
Decorative stonework To match shopping center
Accent stripe for building, car wash, canopy Cement plaster in Shell yellow
Cupola To match building roof and shopping center
Roof-mounted mechanical equipment shall be screened from public view.
bo
A lighting plan shall be submitted for review and approval that indicates
fixture type, dimensions, color and materials. Any outside lighting shall
be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly upon adjoining
property or public rights-of-way. Service canopy light fixtures shall be
recessed. Lighting shall comply with Ordinance No. 655 regarding light
pollution. Light fixtures shall be installed in such a manner that no light
spillage occurs beyond the boundaries of the project site.
(Amended by the Planning Commission, April 7, 1997)
R:~TAFFRPT'G45PA96.pcc 6/3/F7 ckd
The applicant shall use colors that are compatible with the color palette existing
for the Palomar Village Shopping Center. If the color white is used, it shall be
for accent only.
Landscaping shall be installed in substantial conformance with Exhibit WE" Conceptual
Landscape Plan approved with Planning Application No. PA96-0345 or as amended by
these conditions.
a. All utilities on site shall be appropriately screened.
b. Root barriers shall be provided for all trees within five feet of hardscape.
The applicant shall ensure that mature trees do not interfere with driveway sight
lines or overhead power lines.
A final grading plan shall be submitted along with final landscape construction
plans so that cross checking for erosion control can be performed.
The applicant shall comply with Ordinance No. 94-22 regarding water
conservation.
Additional shrubs shall be planted on the northern berm to create a dense barrier
to catch debris prior to routine cleanup of the site. Shrubs along the wa#
separating the project site from Yukon Road shall be moved from the inside of
the wall facing the project to the outside of the wa// facing Yukon.
(Amended by the Planning Commission, April 7, 1997]
All trees p/anted on the site shall be a mixture of deciduous and evergreen
species. However, trees along Yukon Street shall be primarily evergreen. All
new trees shall be predomi,]ant/y 24-inch box in size.
(Added by the Planning Commission, April 7, 1997)
(Amended by the Planning Commission, April 21, 1997)
Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits
The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula
Municipal Code.
10.
The applicant shall demonstrate by submittal of a written report that all mitigation
measures identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program have been satisfied for this
stage of the .development.
Prior to the Issuance of Building Permits
11. A Consistency Check fee shall be paid.
12.
A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted
to the Planning Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School Mitigation
Fees.
R:\STA~SPA95.pcc 6/3/9'7 ckd
13.
Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be submitted to
the Planning Department for approval and shall be accompanied by the appropriate filing
fee. The location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be
shown. These plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The cover
page shall identify the total square footage of the landscaped area for the site.
14.
The applicant shall demonstrate by submittal of a written report that all mitigation
measures identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program have been satisfied for this
stage of the development.
Prior to the Issuance of Occupancy Permits
15.
Sign approvals are not part of this development plan. An application for signage shall
be submitted and approved by the Planning Manager· No sign shall be affixed on, above
or over the roof of any building, including service station canopies.
16.
All landscaped areas shall be planted in accordance with approved landscape, irrigation,
and shading plans.
17.
All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed and be in a
condition acceptable to the Planning Manager. The plants shall be healthy and free of
weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in
good working order.
18.
Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently
affixed reflectorized sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal,
displaying the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than
70 square inches in area and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space
at a minimum height if 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space
finished grade, or centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space
finished grade, ground, or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place,
at each entrance to the off-street parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches,
clearly and conspicuously stating the following:
"Unauthorized vehicles not displaying distinguishing placards or
license plates issued for physically handicapped persons may be
towed away at owner's expense. Towed vehicles may be
reclaimed at or by telephone
In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall have a
surface identification sign duplicating the Symbol of Accessibility in blue paint of at least
3 square feet in size.
19.
Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Planning Manager to
guarantee the installation of plantings, walls, and fences in accordance with the
approved plan, and adequate maintenance of the Planting for one year, shall be filed
with the Department of Planning.
R:\STAFFP. PT'~ISPA96.pcc 6/3/97 ckd
20.
21.
The applicant shall demonstrate by submittal of a written report that all mitigation
measures identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program have been satisfied for this
stage of the development.
All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use
allowed by this permit.
DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING AND SAFETY
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
Comply with applicable provisions of the 1994 edition of the California Building,
Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 1993 National Electrical Code; California
Administrative Code Title 24 Energy and Disabled access regulations and the Temecula
Municipal Code.
Submit at time of plan review complete exterior site lighting plans in compliance with
Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution.
Obtain all building plan and permit approvals prior to commencement of any
construction work.
Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review.
The Occupancy Classification of the proposed use shall be B/M/S-3 (KFC/Sales/Fuel
Dispensing, Carwash).
All building and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations and
must be fully detailed for plan check submittal. (California Disabled Access Regulations
effective April I, 1994).
Provide van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entry. Provide
dimensions (space #10).
Provide house electrical meter provisions for power for the operation of exterior lighting
and fire alarm systems.
Restroom fixtures, number and type, to be in accordance with the provisions of the
1994 edition of the Uniform Plumbing Code, Appendix C.
Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans
submitted for plan review.
Provide electrical plan including load calcs and panel schedule, plumbing schematic and
mechanical plan for plan review.
Truss calculations that are stamped by the engineer of record, the truss manufacturer's
engineer, and that have been plan checked and stamped by the plan check agency and
the City, are required before sheet and shear inspection.
Provide an approved Precise Grading Plan with plan check submittal to check for
handicap accessibility.
R:~STAFFRFI't345PA96.pcc 6/3197 ckd
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
The following are the Department of Public Works Conditions of Approval for this project, and
shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions regarding the true
meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the appropriate staff person of the Department
of Public Works.
It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the tentative site plan all existing and
proposed easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage courses, and their
omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and revision.
General Requirements
35.
A Grading Permit for either rough or precise (including all onsite flat work and
improvements) grading shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained road right-of-way.
36.
An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior
to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way.
37.
All grading plans, landscape and irrigation plans shall be coordinated for consistency
with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site.
38. All plans shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars.
Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits:
39.
The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No
grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or the
project is shown to be exempt.
40.
The Developer must comply with applicable source control and treatment control best
management practices (BMPs) as identified in the "Ca//fornia Stormwater BMP
Handbook" for industrial and commercial uses, to satisfy NPDES and the City.
(Added by the Planning Commission, April 7, 1997)
41.
As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board
Planning Department
Department of Public Works
Eastern Municipal Water District
Rancho California Water District
Community Services District
General Telephone
Southern California Edison Company
Southern California Gas Company
R:\STAFFR.F'I"~5?A96.pcc 6/3/F7 ckd
42.
43.
44.
45.
46.
47.
48.
49.
50.
51.
52.
53.
54.
A Precise Grading Plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by
the Department of Public Works. The plan shall comply with the Uniform Building Code,
City Standards and as additionally required in these Conditions of Approval.
A Soils Report prepared by a registered Soils Engineer shall be submitted to the
Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address
all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the construction of
engineered structures and pavement sections.
An Erosion Control Plan in accordance with City Standards shall be designed by a
registered Civil Engineer and approved by the Department of Public Works.
The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading
and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and
subject to approval by the Department of Public Works.
Permanent landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department
and the Department of Public Works for review.
Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained in a weed-free condition and shall be
either planted with interim landscaping or provided with other erosion control measures
as approved by the Department of Public Works.
A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing Area
Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The charge is payable
to Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District prior to issuance of
any permit. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has been already
credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid.
The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval for offsite work performed
on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public Works.
Concentrated onsite runoff shall be conveyed in concrete ribbon gutters or underground
storm drain facilities to an adequate outlet as determined by the Department of Public
Works.
Letter of approval or a drainage easement shall be obtained from the affected property
owners for the release of concentrated or diverted storm flows onto the adjacent
property. A copy of the drainage easement shall be submitted to the Department of
Public Works for review prior to recordation. The location of the recorded easement shall
be delineated on the precise grading plan.
The Developer shall accept and properly dispose of all off-site drainage flowing onto or
through the site.
The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an
Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the
subject property.
The following criteria shall be observed in the design of the improvement plans and/or
precise grading plans to be submitted to the Department of Public Works:
R:\STA~SPA96.pcc 613/9'7 ckd
Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. end 1.00% minimum over
A.C. paving.
All drive areas shall be designed for two-way, 24-foot travelways with
unobstructed access across the proposed multi-use site.
All driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees or as approved by the
Department of Public Works.
Prior to Issuance of Building Permit:
55.
As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
Planning Department
Department of Public Works
56.
All building pads shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer for location and
elevation, and the Soil Engineer shall issue a Final Soils Report addressing compaction
and site conditions.
57.
The Developer shall deposit with the Engineering Department a cash sum as established
per acre as mitigation for traffic signal impact.
58.
The Developer shall notify the City's cable TV Franchises of the intent to develop.
Conduit shall be installed to cable TV Standards prior to issuance of Certificate of
Occupancy.
59.
The Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities
imposed upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public facility
mitigation as required under the EIR/Negative Declaration for the project. The fee to be
paid shall be in the amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee. If an interim or
final public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally established by the date
on which the Developer requests its building permit for the project or any phase thereof,
the Developer shall execute the Agreement for payment of Public Facility fee, a copy of
which has been provided to the Developer. Concurrently, with executing this
Agreement, the Developer shall post a bond to secure payment of the Public Facility fee.
The amount of the bond shall be $2.00 per square foot, not to exceed $10,000. The
Developer understands that said Agreement may require the payment of fees in excess
of those now estimated (assuming benefit to the project in the amount of such fees).
By execution of this Agreement, the Developer will waive any right to protest the
provisions of this Condition, of this Agreement, the formation of any traffic impact fee
district, or the process, levy, or collection of any traffic mitigation or traffic impact fee
for this project; I;)rovided that the Developer is not waiving its right to protest the
reasonableness of any traffic impact fee, and the amount thereof.
Prior to Issuance of Certification of Occupancy
60.
As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
RASTAFF~SPA96.pcc 6/319'7 ckd
Rancho California Water District
Eastern Municipal Water District
Department of Public Works
61.
The Developer shall confirm that reciprocal access and parking easement agreements
are in place for all shared private facilities.
62.
All onsite improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and
City standards, including but not limited to curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk,
drive approaches, and landscaping, as directed by the Department of Public Works.
63.
The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken
due to the construction operations of this project shall be repaired or removed and
replaced to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works.
64.
All necessary certifications and clearances from engineers, utility companies and public
agencies shall be submitted as required by the Department of Public Works.
OTHER AGENCIES
65.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth by the Rancho California
Water District transmittal dated December 24, 1996, a copy of which is attached.
66.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth by the Riverside County
Flood Control and Water Conservation District transmittal dated February 4, 1997, a
copy of which is attached.
67.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth by the Riverside County
Department of Environmental Health transmittal dated December 26, 1996, a copy of
which is attached.
68.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth by the Fire Department
transmittal dated February 4, 1997.
R: \STAFFRP"~345PA96.pc¢ 6/3/97 ckd
DAVID P. ZAPI~
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL
AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
1995 MARKET
By
Re:
hazard re~xms for suc~ _.ca~e~.. D' .mme.. _~~r. eco,,~agt~ona for -~..m.~ ~~ ~ m ~e~ at
Area Draln~ ~ i~ (~e~m~t ~1~ f~s). In ~. ~a.h~ ~ a g~ ~e ~ pmv~.
The ~ has not .re. viewed the Iproix~sea ~otect in detad amt ~ fol~.che~ced c4~b,.e~ ~o not m .any way
consalute m lm13~y District al~WOVal or en4orsemem of the ~'oposea proloci ~ respect to Iloo;I ~, ~ ~ea~h
and safety or any omar suc~ ~ssue:
v/This ~ wcx~l not be impacted tW OisUict Master Drainage Plan ~ nor are other tacililias o~ reg~nat
inlerNt iDrol:~Ose(L
This I:)rofect mvolvas _:.l:)~_t M~.....ler Plan ta~l~. ~e ~ ~11 a~N ~ of ~ ~ on
' ~ ,~ at me ~,~. F~es must ~ ~nst~ m ~t_ _~a~, and .-~ ~ ~ ~
inS~ will N mNma f~ U~t a~ptance. ~ ~K~ ma~l:~an and ~msnhve fe~ we ~
reelarea.
Th~s prelect i:wo~...ct~. s. torm .drains. 36inchas or ..l~'ger in diameter, or olher facililies mat could De
consi~erecI regional ,1 Ilalm'e_ana/or a iog~,,~l exlens~on of
Master Or4mage Plan. ine District would con_sider m:r,,el~ ownership at such f'ac~l~e~ on whiten re
of me Cily. Fa- 'clJes must tm cons_tructecl to District stm~lards. and Dislnc~ plan check and ~ will be
required for District acceptance. Plan check. Jnspeceon anO aclmmistmlive fees wdl be requireeL
wittan me linals at the ~slncrs HugKIF'r'~ ~.g£E~_/?F..~CU/..~ )'Area
This pro'_te~. ,s located I/ALc~
Oislr~ or City prior to nn~! ap.j~Oval of the Prolect, or in the c~se of a parcel m~l~ m' $ .~livi~n prior to
recordation oflhe 6n~l map. ~.ees to l>e pmO should be ~! ~e rale in elle~l at ~ W ol reoocOalion, or ~
ae~, at the I~ ~ issuan~ of the actual parma.
GFNF~ INFORMATION
This prolect may reqmre a.N, alicmal Polulam Discharge Elimma~n System iNPDES) pem~ from the Slate Water
~e$ources Conlrol Board. ~,lem'ance for grachng, recordation. or ol/ter final air,oval shouKI no( be gwen umil lira City
has de~ermmea that the ~olec~ has been granted a Dem',l or is sno~n to be exeml~L
If this proleer involves a Fede~aI.Em~rgen~ Manage. merit Agency (FEMA) ,,. ~r¢ gd ~ plain, .then. me ~ty shocdd
reouire the aDl:~,anf (o provue all stuoms, calculations. Diane and other mfon~lUOn requwed Io meet FEMA
reeu~emems. aria shoula ..f~me.r require that. the aDDImam oe~ama. Cond'dional Letter Of Mao Revmon (CLOMR) prior
m graa~g, recomahon or omar nnm approvm of the protect, anaa Letter of Map Rawsine (LOMR) I~'lor to oeec_ ~upancy.
If a natur_al watercourse or maopea aooa plain ~s ~moacted 13¥ this IXOfeCt, the City should requa'e t~e aDpiicant to
ootam a 5ect~on 160111603 Agreement from the Ca#foram Department of Fish an0 Game anal a Clean VValer Act
.S. ectlon 40:4.. Parma from. me U.S. An'ny Corl~ of E.ng2.neers..or. w .n~t~. _corresl:x:mae..n~. ~ ...thee_ ~eg~c...~3. mdical~g
me Drolecz is exempt Iro_m these r_equ,reme0ts. A_(;lean water Ac_t Section 401 Water Qua,ty r~_ rtmca,on may
required from me local Califorma ~eg~onat water Mualdy Control Board I~or to issuance ot the CorDs 404
Ve~f truly yours.
STUART E. MCKIBBIN
se.,orC?, e"g.?-. ,
TO:
ATTN: Carole K. Donahoe
FROM: ~'~GREGOR DELLENBACH. Environmental Health Spe¢iali~y
RE: PLOT PLAN NO. PA96-0345 (Development Plan}
County of Riverside.._
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH ,~i~)~
DATE: r)ec&nber 26, 19~)6
The Department of Environmental Health has reviewed the Plot Plan No. PA96-0345
(Development Plan{ and has no objecttons. Sanitary sewer and water services may be
available in this area.
PRIOR TO .4NY PLAN CHECK SUBMITTAL for health clearance. the following items are
required:
"Will-serve" letters from the appropriate water and sewering agencies.
Three complete sets of plans for each food establishment will be submitted, including a
fixture schedule, a finish schedule, and a plumbing sch(mlule in order to ensur~ compliance
with the California Uniform Retail Food Facilities Law. For specific reference, please
contact Food Facility Plan examiners at ~909) 694-5022].
A clearance letter from the Hazardous Services Materials Management Branch (909) 69a,-
5022 will be required indicating that the project has been cleared for:
a) Underground storage tanks, Ordinance # 617.4.
b) Hazardous Waste Generator Services, Ordinance # 615.3.
c) Hazardous Waste Disclosure (in accordance w~th Ordinance # 651.2}.
Waste reduciion managemenl.
O. Waste Regulation Branch (Waste Collec~io~LEA).
GD:dr
275-8980
.'VOTE:
Any current additional reqmrements not covered. can be applicable at time of
Building Plan review tor tlnal Department of Environmental Health clearance.
City of Temecula
l~04~ b~4,~,4~ · F~ (9091 ~94-~9
February ,~, 1997
TO:
Planning Department
C~role Donahoe
RE: PA96-0345
With respect to the conditions of approval for the above referenced development plan, the Fire
Department recommends the following ~u'e proteotmn menures be provided in accordance v, qth
Tcmecuia Ordinaries and/or recogmzed fire protection standards:
The ~'e Department is reelrated m set a minimum f~e flow for the remodel or consauction
of all commerc~ building using the procedures established m Ordinance 546. A ~ flow
of 2500 GPM for a 2 hour dtu~on at 20 PSI residual ~g pressure must be available
before any combustible material is placed on the job site.
The required fire flow shaJJ be available from a super fire hydrant (6"x4"x2-2 '/2" ),
located not less than 25 feet or more than 165 feet from any pomon of the building ~
rn~'~sur~rl nlor~ vehictdnr tr~velw~ys.
Applicant/developer stroll furnish one copy of the water plans Io the Fire Deparm~t for
review. Plans ~ be signed by a regis~ civiJ engineer, containing a Fire Depat, tment
approval signnntre block, and shall conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and
hummum P. re flow. Once the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals
shatl be presented to the Fire Department for signature.
The requu, ed water sys~m, including fire hydr'a~ts, shaU be installed and accepted by the
appropm~e water agency prior to.an), combustible bufidin~ materinJs being placed on the
job site.
Prior to the issuance of budding permits, the developer shall pay $.25 per quare foot as
mitiganon for fire protection impact.
6. Prior to the it~uance of building permits, the apl~,ant/developer shall be respons~ie. to
sut)mit a plan check fee of $582.00 to the City of TernecOa.
TItE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS MUST BE MET PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY.
7. Knox Key lock boxes shall be installed on all buildinp/suites. If building/suiu~ require~
Hazardous Ma~l Reporung (Material Safety Datn Sheets) the Knox IiAZ IvIAT Data
and key stogie cabinets shah be restailed. If buUding/sui~ age protected by a frre or
burglag alarm system, the boxes will require "rantper" tootUtoring. Plans shall be
submitted to the Fire Depamnent for approval prior to installation.
8. All exit doors shah be openable without the use of key or special knowledge or effort.
/ns~U portable fire extragushers with a minimum r'al~g of 2A 10BC. Contact a certified
exunguisher company for proper placement.
10. Applicant/d~veloper shall be responsible for o~ainJng underground and aboveground tank
permi~ from both the County tteaith and Fire Depamnent~.
! ]. Blue dot reflectors shall be mounted m private streets and driveways to indic~t~ location
of fi~e hydrants. They shaU be toountil m the middle of the street direotly in line with
f'tre hydrant.
Prior to final respection of any building, the appUcant shall provide f'tre lanes with
appropriate lane painnng and or signs.
! 3. St~est addt~ shall be posted, m a visible location, minimum 12 inches m height, on the
street side of the building with a contrasting background.
~.~. Final conditions will be addressed when building plans ~re reviewe~ m the Building and
S~fety Office.
15. Plea.~e contact the Fire Department for a final inspection prior to occupancy.
All quesnons r~ga~ding the meamng of these conditions shall be referred to the Fire Department
Planning and engineering secuon (909)693-39'74.
ra Cabral
· ,rc Sa£ety Specialist
December 24, 1996
Ms. CarDie Donahoe, Case Planner
City of Temecuta
Planning Department
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590-3606
C 966L 4
SUBJECT:
WATER AVAILABIUTY
PARCEL 7 OF PARCEL MAP 23472
APN 921-700-017
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA 96.0345
Dear Ms. Oonahoe:
Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located wilhin
lhe boundaries of Rant"no California Waler District (RCWD). Water
sen/ice, therefore, would be available upon completion of f'mancial
arrangements belween RCWD and the property owner.
!f fire prolection is required, customer will need to contact RCWD for
fees and requirements.
Water availability would be contingent upon the property owner signing
an Agency Agreement which assigns water management rights, if any,
to RCWD.
If you have any questions, please contact an
Representative at this office.
Sincerely,
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT
Steve BrannOn, P.E.
Development Engineering Manager
96/S8:mc~16/F01 ~FEG
Laurie Williams, Eng,neenng $erv,ces Supervisor
Engineering
Services
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
APPEAL MEMORANDUM
R:\STAFl~.PT~345PA~6.CCl 6/3/9'7 dwh 1 3
City of Teme ula
43200 Business Parle Dnve
P.O. ~x ~33 ~ ~AY 0 6 ]997
Tem~ula, ~ifom~
(909) 694-64~ · FAX (~) 6~~By
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
;INCOMPLETE APII~fCA'!1OI~ C~ BE'&CCLalrr!~I :i:..
ASSESSOR PARCEL NO{S).
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. ?~ q(/o "' (~)~ (~ 6
.. ~e of Review Requested:
Annexation IAF)
Appeal
CEQA
Conditional Use Permit
ca Existing Building (MCUP)
rq
O
0
0
0
o New Building (In addition, check appropriate Development Plan) (CUP)
Development Agreement t DA)
Developmere Plan
u Over 10,000 square feet, subject to CEQA {PPN9
~ Under 10,000 square t~et, subject to CEQA (PP)
c~ Under 10,000 square feet. not subject to CEQA (PPA)
0 Subdivision - Home Product
Extension of Time for Planning Application No.
General Plan Amendment ~GPA$)
Minor Exception (PP2)
Specific Plan (SP)
Tentative Parcel Map
Tentative Tract Map
Variance (VAR)
Zoning. Amendment: Text or Map Change, Specific Plan Amedment (CZ)
FAX NO.
L %?¢/
.~'A~11 '
FAX NO.
MI.
ADDRP-~
OWNER
PHONE NO. FAX NO.
ADDRESS
AIaI~.ICANT'S SIGNAT~~'
Pro~eet Information:
Project Descnpnon/Use:
Project Locanon:
Application Type:
Code
Genera/Plan:
Res. Use Type:
Gross Acres:
Overall Project Square Footage:
Reia'.~ C~-ses:
Proposed ProJect Phazmg:
Esumated Number of Employees Per SNf~:
Number of Lo~/Umu:
(Office Use Only}
# Units:
# of Lots:
Added Gross Acres:
# Added Units:
# Added Lots:
Owner Certification
I cerufy that I am presently the legzt owner or the authorized agent for the above-described propert3,.
acknowledge the filing of this applicauon and certify that all of the above information is true and accurate.
Signature:
Print Name:
Date:
Aeent of the ownermust-attach a letter of. authorizatlon':from::the~ile~nl~ownev::,
City of Temecma
Community Development Department
43200 Business Park Drive * Temecula · CA · 92590
P.O. Box 9033, Temecula · CA · 92589-9033
(909) 694-6400 · FAX (909) 694-6477
8¥_
npl .a
Original Case Number(s) ~/~ .~ /'~ ~ 4,~-'/--
The purpose of the appeal procedure is to provide a method of recourse for persons aggrieved by or
dissatisfied with an action taken by an administrative agency of the City in the administ~tion or
enforcement of any provisions of the Development Code.
B. FII.ING RF. QIIIRl:Mt::NTR
1. Development Application.
2. Appeal Form.
3. Filing Fee.
C. NOTICE OF APPEAI~ - TIME. TIM'IT
A notice of an appeal by any individual who is aggrieved by or dissatisfied with a decision made by
him or in his behalf, or with any action, order, requirement, decision or determination shall not be
acted upon unless Hled within fifteen (15) calendar days after se~ce of written notice of the decision.
D. NOTICE OF APPEAl,- CONTENTS
Appealing the decision of:
Specify exactly what is being appealed:
2119/97
Reason or justification to support ~e appeal. Appellant must submit wi~h this appeal each issue which
the appellant alleges was wrongly determined together with every agreement and a copy of ev~'y item
of evidence. (Attach separate sheet of paper if necessary).
Desired action to be taken:
In the event any Notice of Appeal applicant fails to answer any information set forth above, then
the request will be returned to the appellant, with a statement of the deficiencies. The appellant
shall be allowed five (5) calendar days in which to refile the notice of aI~al.
Dear Sir~ ~ ~
Re: Appl. PA 960= ,/Shell Station & Car Wash _omplex in the
Palomar Village in Temecula Ca.
The Board of Directors join with the concerned citizens of the
Villages Community HOA in stating that this is an inappropriate
addition to the Palomar Shopping Center. It will have a major
impact on safety, quality of life, and home values. The specific
areas this includes: traffic, noise, light, hazardous materials,
and the safety of our children.
TRAFFIC: Yukon is basicly a residential access street. It
is the only access for about 40% of the residents (400) of the
Villages. It is their only route getting to and from their
homes. The additional vehicular traffic, as well as supplier
trucks to the convenience store and KFC, and one 65 foot tractor
trailer gas truck per day can and will have a major impact on
the citizens who depend on this for access. Add to this the
addition of 1400 new homes from the adjoining Temeku Development
without a prior condition of a signal at Yukon & Margarita Rd.
At least 1/2 the cost should be borne by th developer of Palomar
and Shell Oil. They are creating the traffic and should be
part of the solution and pay the costs.
NOISE: The developer has agreed to their own condition that
noise levels will not exceed the current noise levels of
Margarita Rd. A. What time of day? B. What days? C. Why are
we talking noisy Margarita Rd. rather than the impacted Yukon?
As we understand it, the addition of three decibles doubles
the noise level. The developer says it will generate 9 ~ .
decibels...the same as Margarita . Add the two, and the nois~
level is increased considerably. The only evidence they have
is a noise study on a car wash conducted in ]991, and nowhere
does it state that there was a car in the car wash when this
experiment was performed. Car doors slamming, air brakes on
trucks, speakers activated, music playing ..... these are all
new additons to the residential area.
LIGHTS: Our concern is that light and glare will have an impact
on nearby residences. No corrective action for glare has been
addressed. (Black concrete or asphalt?) The developer has
offered to recess all lights. OUr question is: What does that
mean? We want to see the evidence. The city should demand
information to assure the citizens of what this is. A general
comment shouldn't be part of the conditions.
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: The Villages are responsible for the
maintenance and safety of the Long Valley Flood Control Wash.
Any spill or run-offs, etc. must end up in our wash. A condition
was made for a catch basin. We want the fluids tested prior
to release, or a bond with the city to protect the wash and
the citizens with adjoining home sites.
CHILDREN: There are three schools nearby. The children must
use Yukon both coming and going as they walk to school. Add
all this new vehicular traffic, 1400 new homes, and no signal
and common sense tells you that the children's safety is
imperiled.
Sincerely,
David Micheal, Presient of the Villages HOA
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
MINUTES OF THE MARCH 13, 1997
PLANNING DIRECTOR'S HEARING
R:~STAFFKFI'L~SPA~6.CCI 6/3/97 dwh '~ 4
OF T~ C1TY OF TEMECUL~
PL~[~G DIRECTOR
MAR~ 1~, 1~
A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Planning Director was called to order on Thursday,
March 13, 1997 at 1:30 PM, at the City of Temecula Main Conference Room, 43200 Business
Park Drive, Temecula, California. Senior Planner Dave Hogan presiding.
Also presem were Project Planner Ca,role Donahoe, Assistant Engineer Larry Cooley and Minute
Clerk KeRi Beal.
1. Planning Appli~fion No. PA97-0028 f13~velopment PLY',0
Senior Planner Dave Hogan continued Planning Application No. PA97-0028 a
Development Plan to construct and operate a single story, 9,928 square foot industrial
warehouseoffice building for Kruse Microwave Enterprises to the March 20, 1997
Director's Hearing.
2. P!nnning Application No. PA96-0345 0')evelopment Plat0
Carole Donahoe presenmt the staff.,'~pon for a Development Plan to construct and operate
a Shell automobile service station with a 648 square foot automated carwash, a 875 square
foot convenience mart (without alcoholic beverage sales) and a Kentucky Fried Chicken
1,645 square foot fast food restaurant with drive-through service.
Senior Planner Dave Hogan opened the public hearing.
Larry Markham, Markham and Associates, 41750 Winchester Road, Temecula,
representing the applicant S&L Oil. JV, concurred with the Conditions of Approval except
that the service station was proposed for 24-hour operation. He also felt that KFC wanted
their corporate logo in red and white.
David Mayberry, 42055 Kaffuboom Ct., Temecula spoke in opposition of the project due
to increased traffic. He sated the Village Grove HOA board was unanimously opposed.
Richmond Jackson, 30450 Anaconda Ct., Temecula spoke in opposition of the project due
to noise issues and safety concerns with the gas station and gas tanks so close to
residential.
Audrey Modonia, 30486 Danube, Temecula spoke in opposition of the project due to
health and safety concerns, specifically related to gas, emissions, and vapors.
lim Catapolis, 42075 Humber Dr., Temecula spoke in opposition of the project due to
concerns with pedestrians and increased traffic.
Semor
Rou BessIcy, 30605 Hollybeny, Temecula spol~ in opposition of the pwject due to traffic
and access issues. He required if a Iraffic study has been done. He also expressed concern
with safety issues with gas and leaky gas tanks and environmental issues.
Marilyn Sawyer, 30443 Danube Ct., Temecula spoke in opposition of the project with
concerns with traffic and the lack of a tra2ffic signal at Yukon and Margarita. She
expressed concerns with parking.
David Michaels, 30300 Churchill Ct., Temecula spoke in opposition of the project with
concerns about traffic, safety and health issues.
Frank Wagnon, 42180 Sweet Shade, Temecula requested a wall the same height as the
trash enclosures and a berm with fasl growing landscape along Yukon Street. He
expressed concern with safety, health and traffic issues.
Planner Dave Hogan closed the public comments section.
Assistant Engineer Larry Cooley stated a traffic study had been done in 1988 when the
center was proposed. Project Planner Carole Donshoe stated an Environmental Impact
Report was prepared for the General Plan in 1993.
The applicant's representative Larry Markham responded to concerns:
He stauxi that tanker truck deliveries would be as needed, probably one or two
deliveries per week.
The gas tanks are double wailed with monitors with leak alert going directly to the
Fire Department.
Mr. Markham stated the car wash recycles the water and the recycling umt is
underground.
He staled the car wash would not be operating 24 hours.
Mr. Markham stated the applicant would not be opposed to building a wall with
landscape clustered to prevent graffiti.
He stated the Traffic Study was prepared in 1988 and the EIR was prepared in
1993 and they anticipated future buildout.
He stated this is not a Light Industrial use.
He stated the berming addresses the noise issue.
Semor Planner Dave Hogan stated the traffic should reduce when the centers at Hwy 79
South and Margarita Road open for business. Lighting wiU be recessed lighting and will
comply with the Mr. Palomar Lighting requirements. He stated a condition is to be added
to require the location of trash cans be approved. Representative Mr. Markham
concurred. Senior Planner Dave Hogan stated a condition is to be added that would add
the wall to the south side of the berm along Yukon Street. He stated the red and white
stripe on the top of KFC building would not be approved and he stated that the service
station operation would be 24-hours.
Senior Planner Dave Hogan adopted the Negative Declaration prepared for Planning Application
No. PA96-0345 (Development Plan) and approved the project subject to the Findings and
Conditions of Approval.
The meeting was adjourned at ~:15 P.M.
The next meeting will be held on March 20, 1997 at 1:30 ?M at the City of Temecula Main
Conference Room, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
ATTACHMENT NO. 4
DRAFT MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING
OF APRIL 7, 1997
R:\STAFFRFI'k345PA96.CC1 613197 dwh 1 5
MINUTES OF A REGULAR lVll~..TING
OF ~ CITY OF TEM~~
PLANNING COMMISSION
APRI'I~ 7~ 1997
A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Planning Commission was called to order on Monday, April 7, 1997,
6:01 P.M., at the City of Temecula Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Co-
Chairman Slaven presiding.
PRESENT: Miller, Slaven, Soltysiak, Webster
ABSENT: Fahey
Also present were Community Development Director Gary Thornhill, Principal Engineer Ron Parks, Assistant
City Attorney Rubin D. Weiner, Planning Manager Debbie Ubnoske, Senior Planner Dave Hogan, Associate
Planner Matthew Fagan, Assistant Engineer Larry Cooley and Minute Clerk Pat Kelley.
PUBLIC COM2MENTS
Co-Chairman Slaven called for public comments on non-agenda items. There were no requests to speak.
COMMISSION BUSINESS
Approval of Agenda
Co-Chairman Slaven requested Item 5 be heard after Item 6 as the proponents, who were from out of
town, had not arrived.
It was moved by Commissioner Miller, and seconded by Commissioner Webster, to approve the agenda
as amended.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 4 COMMISSIONERS: Miller, Slaven, Soltysiak, Webster
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: 1 COMMISSIONERS: Fahey
Chairman Fahey arrived at 6:03 P.M.
Approval of March 17. 1997 Minutes
It was moved by Commissioner Miller, and seconded by Commissioner Webster, to approve the minutes
of March 17, 1997, with the following amendments:
Page 3, last paragraph, add Commissioner Soltysiak requested clarification that other developers would
not be subsidizing this developer's infrastructure cost.
R:\PLANCOMM\MINUT£S\1997\4-7-97.~IPD 6/2/97 vgw i
p?,RNNTNG CO~fMTSSTON
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 4
NOES: 1
ABSENT: 0
COMMISSIONERS: Miller, Slaven, Soltysiak, Fahey
COMMISSIONERS: Webster
COMMISSIONERS None
6. Planning Application No. PA96-0345 - (Development Plan, Palomar Village Shopping Center)
Commissioner Webster stated although his residence is in the adjacent area, he is beyond the conflict of
an interest limit.
Assistant City Attorney Weiner asked Commissioner Slaven to confirm she does not have any
predisposition regarding how the grounds mentioned in her letter of March 25, 1997, may come out in
this hearing. Commissioner Slaven stated she would make her decision solely based on the evidence
presented in the hearing.
Senior Planner Dave Hogan presented the staff report.
Commissioner Webster asked if the requested uses are permitted or conditionally permitted. Mr. Hogan
replied they are permitted uses.
Commissioner Webster asked if a signal is planned for the Margarita Road/Yukon intersection. Assistant
Engineer Larry Cooley answered no signal is scheduled at this time because the intersection does not meet
warrams -- trip counts for Margarita Road, just north of Rancho California Road, were 13,500 daily as
of July 1996. Principal Engineer Ron Parks stated the maximum allowable is approximately 20,000 per
day.
Commissioner Slaven questioned if the tanker trucks can safely enter and exit the facility from Yukon.
Mr. Cooley stated the turning radii at the intersection can accommodate a tanker truck and Yukon was
originally approved as a commercial collector street.
Commissioner Miller questioned whether the loaded weight of 23 service tankers monthly will overstress
the street. Mr. Cooley replied he does not feel this is a concern.
Commissioner Slaven stated landscaping and driveway access will displace parking spaces and question
the depth from the driveway property line to the landscaping area. Mr. Hogan answered it is about 15'.
Chairman Fahey opened the public hearing at 6:45 P.M.
Larry, Markham, 41750 Winchester Road, representing the applicant S&L Oil, JV, stated the applicant
remains in concurrence with the Conditions of Approval as modified at the March 13, 1997 Director~'
heating. He provided additional detail regarding lighting (1/4-foot candle at the sidewalk, and sufficie
for the Police Department) and landscaping. He suggested the shrubs be moved to the outside of the
buffer wall, and said the applicant is willing to make a right-turn exit only at the car wash to eliminate
stop sign problems. Mr. Markham stated the applicant continues to request @ 24-hour operation for the
gas station.
R: \PLANCOMM\MIHUTE$\1997\4-7-99 .WPD 6/2/97 v~, 3
pT,~,NZ/T~G CO~'I~Z~;BT01~ ~ 7 · ~ 997
~~ioner Slaven ~k~ if new ~s were pl~ed for ~e no~ side of ~e prope~. Mr. M~
repli~ five (5) or six (6) 24" box ~ndon Pl~n, tr~s, ~d pines, md shrubby, ~e pl~ed ~ong ~e
w~l or ~. Mr. M~ ~gge~ ~ndition 6F be modified to put ~e l~dsc~e buffer ou~ide ~e
w~l.
Commissioner Slaven asked if the height of the canopy could be lowered. Mr. Markham stated lowering
the canopy could restrict RV service.
Commissioner Slaven questioned the need for the service station to operate 24 hours a day. Mr.
Markham replied competing stations are presently open 24 hours.
Joanne Boggein, 30591 Hollyberry Lane, representing the Village Homeowners Association, stated when
driving a full size van, she has problems pulling onto Yukon with cars parked on both sides and
questioned a tanker being able to make the move safely. She presented photos of businesses in the
Palomar Center and Temecula illustrating tile roofs and small signage and requested any slanting or
visible portion of the buildings be tile rather than metal. Ms. Boggein stated the Long Valley Wash could
be a victim of hazardous spills and runoff and asked if Shell or the developer would post bonds for
damages and health hazards to clean up the wash. She mentioned this is the first service station in a
residential area.
Barbara Michael, 30300 Churchill Court, representing the Village Homeowners Association, spoke in
opposition to the project due to the increase in noise and light levels.
Jim Contopulos, 42075 Humber Drive, representing the Village Homeowners Association, spoke in
opposition to the project due to excess lighting created by a 24-hour operation.
David Michael, 30300 Churchill Court, representing the Village Homeowners Association, spoke in
opposition to the project because of an increase in traffic, noise, and lighting in the area. However, if
the project is approved, he recommended the applicant pay half of the cost for a signal at Yukon and
Margarita Road. He stated only one meeting was held with the homeowners and all attendees were
opposed to the project.
Sharon Mayberry, 42055 Kaffirboom Court, spoke in opposition to the project due to an increase in
accidents and the safety of children on Yukon.
Curtis Schen, 42136 Teatree Court, representing KFC and a Village Grove property owner, spoke in
favor of the project and stated the restaurant manager is very conscientious and has addressed concerns
raised by homeowners.
Commissioner Slaven asked if it is anticipated that most of the customers will be drive-thru ones. Mr.
Schen replied the business is geared for drive-thru traffic and he does not anticipate many dining room
customers as they only have two (2) booths and seating for two at a counter.
Commissioner Slaven expressed concem about customers crossing the drive-thru lane since a majority
of the parking is on the west side. Mr. Schen replied KFC believes their customers will be from the gas
station rather than the Center. He suggested signage might be helpful.
R:\PLANCOMN\MINUTgS\1997\4-7-97.WPD 6/2/97 v.cr., 4
Frank Villirilli, 30371 Red River Circle, spoke in opposition to the project because of odors, accidents,
and trailer truck noise.
Peter Rathbun, 24399 Avenida Musico, Murrieta, representing the Village Homeowners Association,
expressed concern the project is not meeting discharge requirements. He said rather than going into an
approved concrete or underground system; the proposed storm drain system has been incorporated into
the area's green belt. Mr. Pathbun stated that most car washes do not meet OSHA noise pollution
requirements at significant distances from the blower/dryer assembly.
Michelle Dawn, 41880 Humber, spoke in opposition to the proposal because of the loss of parking spaces
and increased traffic.
Gus Friedel, 42140 Teatree, spoke in opposition to the project due to landscaping restrictions in the
Village Grove CC&Rs, which homeowners will prevent use of landscape material to block out noise.
Katharine Lara, 42162 Sweet Shade Lane, stated opposition to the proposal because increased traffic will
adversely affect those who like to walk/jog/run in the area.
Mike Helfrich, 42144 Teatree Court, spoke in opposition to the project.
Don Harper, 42020 Teatree Court, spoke in opposition.
Debra Prentice, 30445 Shenandoah Court, spoke in opposition to the project because there is nothing to
advance the village center concept; to the contrary, it creates additional vehicular traffic.
In response to the concerns raised, Mr. Markham reiterated; 1) The traffic generated by this facility will
be below the 5 % allowable range of additional impact. 2) The center has paid about $55,000 in traffic
mitigation fees which should pay for half of a signal ar Yukon and Margarita Road. 3) He said double
wall tanks with censoring devices which tie into HAZMAT will be installed and HAZMAT holds the
developer liable for any haT~rdous spills. 4) The applicant offers to put in a chamber catch basin, which
is an anticipated future municipa//industrial best management practice for EPDS. 5) The car wash has
a clarifier system which basically recirculates the water; Eastern Water District will monitor for any
violations. 6) Mr. Markham stated the planned tanker access is along Margarita Road onto Yukon, but
a routing through the center is possible. He accepted the condition that no light spillage shall occur
beyond the property line. He provided staff with a car wash acoustic study showing the dryer end, the
noisiest area, will have a decibel reading of less than 75 at 30 feet. The developer will accept a condition
that noise generated by' the car wash will not exceed ambient noise levels for Margarita and Rancho
California Roads. Mr. Markham stated a complete pedestrian walking system around the site has been
provided, and Lucky's has approved the project. He added the metal roof was dictated by staff to match
existing buildings and the developer is neutral on style and open to modification. Mr. Markham
mentioned the nine (9) existing trees along Yukon will be retained (the diseased ones replaced) and five
(5) additional ones at about 20' spacing are planned, as well as some on Margarita Road.
Commissioner Slaven asked how HAZMAT and the fire department were notified of hn?_ardous leaks.
Mr. Markham explained an automatic alarm system, with a dedicated phone line to HAZMAT, issues
such a warning.
R:\PLANCO~'~4\MINUT£S\1997\4-7-97.WPD 6/2/97 vqw 5
UAIII~SCAP~F:.DJ AREA~-' '
/ ~ ) . · ~. -~
I / 'mas~ i5' .Li~"IT ~-~"- ' "'" '
. ENCLOSURE __ . t ..-'--=.
i : 21'-.4" / -1~l....0 '~,!IN.'~, ! ~t
~ > , ................ -%,',
_: . ~.~ , ~ .. ............. ..-~,,, ,
.~~ ~o~:, '. "'""~':-- - R.~, ' ':....
/ ~ ~ // , ~,~.~'~" ~.,~.~*.~' :'.'u .'~.~.. 1' ,~_,,
.... :~..:~ .~.: ......-.;~.'.~p).
- ~X~ ~ ,-, ~ ~..~ ~.~ .~ .~ ......,...~~L~ ~ ,
,' ,/~ oL"'. - ' "":" .....:'""'~ ...."'~'''
~ V/_.~',[. ' ':"..'. '. .' .':~.~ / '
,~ X ~. N r--~"" ' -''-'"~'"' """ :'"':'" :"~ '""~ ~ ~ ' '
· / ~, %'~:~._ //,. ~'~.. ~' ' ."- "'~:.,,
~ ~' ~ !i' !l.~ //, .~I~~ ~',.., ... · - ': ... , ......."'.:' -.' ,-':: '~::. ":
.. ~ /,·~..~. ...,. .. .. _ ,...~..[ .1:~ ,
, , , ,. ,., .., . ., .. ... ., .. ,_. . .. . , .. . ,..:.,., ,, ....
~ ~.... .~' ."1.~ ..%""~,' 4, ~ t. ~ ~". ' ",~,.'-':~ '... -~ ,, · ~,--,~,:~~
~ '~'; ~. :'~v'~" .''. ',' · ~ ' .' 1'- ' ~'"(" "' ' .'..' "' 'l-'.'l ~,
' t"~'~ · ' ' ~ *' '' ,I- -'' · , ' .... .' ~: '-" ' ' " ':' · gl''* ,* ~
Z~..%. t. . · ~.N.. · · : ,.. ~- · · · .
-- ' '' * ~ '* ' ' ' ~*"-' * '' O" ~." .... ':%~, * ....
/ '~ %'; "'" ' . . , ' ..; ~.,:.:.~:"{~.~:.',.':~.:~:~.:.:~.,~.~"~','.:?...,~.'~.'..*
. .,.... ..- .~,:..::, ....., .... ~ ....,..., , ....
· .. .... . '. ,:. . ~ ~' ...'.~:,.'.:. .,,. ~ '.,,-:~,':..t~" ~'. .
" ~ . "'.--/I.~=.':.'~: ',. :" -."..-':~.'.'"' .'..'-.,',~ :~'~- . /"
" .q..S "..., ~' -"."..' ' ;...-; ' ',l':';.::>~.:'-::".':,....::.,::,:~'::'-.t"::, h:' ~:-
~~ ~ ' ~ '~." ' .t' : -. "', .b. "~'" ' " '-'' ',~ .-J~: ,?.'. ~: -''
/ ' ,.~ ' .. % . - .... ... ~.. ~'. ~'-~ ,.-- · , '~' .~ -.~:.. ~,, = .... .,.
. . . . . ~/ ... '-:.,.i...,:.:..~-,:.. -.~.'. ?,'~.:..':.~:..'.~. ' ..'~,.;~.'~. :/
· , . ,, . ::~ ~ -; .,, , ... :.'-.: ., .' · ~ · ,' ~ ' ,,.
' ' ~' >.·~ x72BL~~..,~4:.,.. ~.:, .....::.~' .~:~..,-..-.L:--.
~ , ,U .. OHIOKEN/~":::-:""~::i:::::~x~';'~;"0:q'::::~':?~~
~ . -.... .,:,. ~ "~, . ..... ~- · .. . ~.'~
'-'':'"'~:: ' ' ~ · · ' .', C,. '.:";'z'? · ~
_. - .~ -',~:~ _ SNACK,: ."'...: .:,...-:,....,-GANOBY~-~.,.: 1,.:. :::.... ~:.
_ , 2,520 ~.f...,., .......8 .~0 ~(!,..... , ~...~.
-~ "~ .... :. ,~ .......s .... · .... ... ....~ ..,
· ~' :," ?: ...? U..::,.'..:::~~'.',.": '):,'.t;'~' :"~ :' ,
Attn: Carole Donahoe, Project Planner
4~200 Business Park Drive, P.O. Box 92589-903~ /
FROM: Frank Wagnon 42180 Sweetshade Lane, Temecula, Ca
RE: Planned nroject at S/W corner - Yukon and Margarita
Our visit at your desk on 21 January 1997
DATE: 2~ January 1999
Carole,
To confirm our discussion and to review my thoughts on this
oronosed nroJect~ these are some of the concerns I raised.
1. Night !ightine, brightness disturbance
2.. Loudsneakers at all three nronosed business onerations
Car wash machine noise
h. 8' foot wall along Yukon - measured from the building grade
Trash-litter from food wrappings blowing u~ Sweetshade Lane
(C~rl's Restaurant) a~d small n!~stic styrofoam ~acki~g'
¥its are s freouent concern
6. Large !8 wheelers would come in on Yukon which would be
noisey sod dabgerous to nearby'residents
aroma
7. The sickicy'of fried chicken ~athing in boiling grease
all day is narticularly disturbing
I object to this oroject of gas station, car-wash, restaurant
and fast food being located here at the edge of a residential
~rea.
I would have little or no objection if the omonosed nroject
were of a C-2 typw develonment le. nrofessional offlce~
port-littering, non-aromatic, non-noisey, non-bright or limited
day-coeration.
This is bad plan.
Carole~ - Thank you azain for your courtesy apd your assurance
thet this communication will get to the Planning Commissiop
and will be given a fair and comnlete hearing at all conerned
levels of our ciy ~overnment.
T~r--8~']K wa gnon ~
'rE~ECUt~ CA 92591
P.S. This letter may also
contain names of others
who endorse all or hart of
this eoMmun:~ca
ATTACHMENT NO. 7
SITE PLAN EXHIBIT
R:\ST^F~SPA96.CCl 6/3/97 dwh 1 8
CITY OF TEMECULA
I
- -~ 1 ~, 1..-/f-T-~ ,-...o..~..,,~,.,..,~/
--~ -~'~ '1 ~1'~ .~ -
-~. ~__~,~., ~-~
.... ~~?, E,-~ _ _~.. _ I I, ~
~.~ ~ ~ , ~i ~.;~ / ~ I ~ ~'~ ~l ~-~
I I i ~ -. ~ ~. ~.~ ~ I ~ ~
/ ' J . ~, ~ '/' /
~ ~ ~---~ /,, ~ ~ · .~ , .~.- --
' ~ ~ /~ ~ I : J : ~'~ ~" ~ ' '"
~. ~ ,~. s _ SNACK : -~: ~ /
. ,~_~ ~~ ~ ~ __~ i .,~~-'~
.~ ~ ) . , ~ k~ t~ ~. ~,~ ~ --- .,' .~ : ~ ~ ~1 ~-~.~ r.-/
/ -- ',~ ~--- , ~~& /~ ~ d ll ~' ~t
- ~-,- ~ ~ , '~~,~,~,,.-~.'~~ ,~ / i /
. . x , ~ ~ ~{~~, .l~~/,~' ~l' '. ' ~ / . ~ / * J~'
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA96-0345
SITE PLAN FROM APRIL 7, 1997 PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING
CITY COUNCIL DATE: JUNE 10, 1997
ITEM. 20
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
City Clerk
June 10, 1997
Planning Commission Appointments
APPROVAT,
CITY ATTORNEY
RECOMMENDATION:
Planning Commission.
Appoint two applicants to serve a full three-year term on the
BACKGROUND: The expiring term of Commissioners Marcia Slaven and Andrew Webster
was advertised in accordance with the Council's adopted policy and procedure for making
appointments and re-appointments.
The applications received were forwarded to Mayor Birdsall and Councilmember Ford for a
recommendation. Their recommendations are as follows:
Mayor Birdsall recommends the appointment of Commissioner Marcia Slaven and Ron
Guerriero.
Councilmember Ford recommends the appointment of Commissioner Marcia Slaven and John
Telesio.
Attached are copies of the applications which were received by the filing deadline of May 27,
1997.
ATTACHMENTS: Copies of Applications for Appointment
R:\agenda.rpt~a[Dpoint .I)ln 1
APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO BOARDS, COMMrrTEF~ .ND'I~OMMI~ION |
· Qualification Requ,rement: Resident of the CRyof Tem~,w'~
PLANNING COMMISS IO~r
BOARD, COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU WISH TO SERVE:
NAME: JOHN H. TELESIO
YEARS RESIDENT OF TEMECULA ! 7
ADDRESS: 31760 Via Telesio, Temecula, CA 92592
Voicemai l~P~ger:
HOME PHONE: 909-676-7187 WORK PHONE~ 909-417-985n
OCCUPATiON:Retired-USAF Officer and retired Assistant to County Supervis
EMPLOYER NAME:
EMPLOYER ADDRESS:
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND/DEGREES:
Bachelor of Arts, Social-Political Science, Calif. State University, L.A
Master of Science, Systems Management, University of Southern California
Master of Public Administration, Calif. State University, San Bernardino
21 additional professional development semester units, Chapman College
LIST ANY RIVERSIDE COUNTY OR OTHER CITY BOARD, COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION
ON WHICH YOU HAVE SERVED AND THE YEAR(S) OF SERVICE:
Charter Member, Riverside County Code Enforcement Task Force,19~7-1993
March AFB Community Council, 1980-1993
SCAG Regional Airport Authority, 1985-]993
~ili~avy Affairs ~o~mittoe0. Greater Rivers~3Chambers of Comme,r~5~p~
Participated ~n original Temecula ~ncor~,or~on ~l~nn~n~ l~roce~s
ORGANIZATIONS TO WHICH YOU BELONG: ~rofe~siom~, ~ech.ic~, communiU, ser~ce):
American Management Association
American Society for Public Administration
Air Force Association
Active fn variety of youth acti-~'ities.'~nd'fm support of TV~4S l~ro~rams.
BRIEFLY STATE WHY YOU WISH TO ~ERVE ON THIS BOARD OR COMMISSION, AND
WHY YOU BELIEVE YOU ARE QUALIFIED FOR THE POSITION. BE SPECIFIC ggse
paper h' neck'):
Please see attached statement.
I understand that any or all information on this form may be verified. I consent to the release of this
information fo%public information purposes.
\,',, -,,
PLEASE NOT~: A~plications will be kel~ o. file for ¢oasideration of fulur~ vacancies.
Return to: City Clerk's Office, 43200 Business Park Drive (909) 694-6444 OR
Mail to: P.O. Box g033, Tomocula,
r: \¢onums~appform
BRI~LY STATE WHY YOU WISH TO SERVE ON TI-~S COMMISSION AND WHY YOU
BELIEVE YOU ARE QUALIFIED FOR THE POSITION:
From 1985 through 1993, a span of time which included periods of both unprecedented
growth and economic downturn in Riverside County, I served as an assistant to the Supervisors of
two of the most dynamic districts in the County. Among my principal duties was the
pre-application review, analysis and the formulation of recommendations regarding proposed
development projects. I also served as liaison between the supervisors and the Planning
Commission, the Economic Development Agency, the Planning and Land Use Agency, Flood
Control, LAFCO and other county departments in helping to coordinate, guide and monitor the
progress of selected projects through the planning process fi'om application to final disposition.
From this practical experience I became quite familiar with the functions and procedures of these
various players and especially those of the Planning Commission with which. I worked most
closely. In addition, during this period, I earned a Master of Public Administration Degree with
an emphasis in economic and community development in order to improve my knowledge,
understanding and performance. I have attended many meetings of the Temecuia Planning
Commission and have noted little if any difference from the processes and procedures I am
familiar with at the county level. I feel that my education, background and experience would
make my transition to a position on the City Planning Commission a smooth and efficient one.
As a 17-year resident, I have witnessed and participated in the city's conception, birt~
growth and development as a proud citizen. During my 21-year military career, I experienced no
less than 17 permanent changes of residence. When we came to Temecula, my wife and I knew
that we had found a home. We have raised our family here and we are here to stay. We have a
stake in this City and have enjoyed the benefits of life in the wonderful environment it has
provided us. I would now like to take this opportunity do something meaningfial in return that
wouid contribute to its continued growth and improvement. In surrmmry, I have the time,
interest, experience , education, ability and desire to become an effective member of the
Temecula City Planning Commission.
PLANNING COMMISSION
BOARD, COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU WISH 70 SERVE:
CITY OF TEMECULA
APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO BOARDS, COMMITTEES ~ I
Qualification Requirement: Resident of the City'of Temecu~n ' ._._.....-.----I!~--
NAME: Pamela Ann Powel!
ADDRESS: 44727-E La Paz,
HOME PHONE: 909-699-1683
Sr. Judicial
OCCUPATION:
EMPLOYER NAME:
Riverside County
EMPLOYER ADDRESS: P- 0. B o x 1 5 6 9,
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND/DEGREES:
Please see attached
YEARS RF.~IDENTOF TEMECULA ..
Temecula, CA 92592
WORKPHONE: 909-245-3371
Office Assistant (Deputy Court Clerk)
Consolidated Courts
Riverside, CA 92502
resume.
LIST ANYRIVERSIDE COUNTY OR OTHER CITY BOARD, COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION
ON WHICH YOU HAVE SERVED ANDTHE YEAR(~OFSERVICE:
Riverside Economic Development Council 1990-~993
School District Liaison, School Improvement Plan Review Committee
1990-1991
ORGANIZATIONS TO WHICH YOU BELONG: (Professiomll, technical, community, service):
California Court Clerks Association
BRIEFLY STATEWHY YOU WISH TO SERVE ON THIS BOARD OR COMMISSION, AND
WHY YOU BELIEVE YOU AREQUALIFIED FOR THE POSITION. BE SPECI~C ~ ~dit~n~
~rffnecessary): I am really proud to tell people that I live in Temecula.
~cnose to move here 8 years ago after a divorce and have chosen to
remain because I could not find a better quality of life in another
Southern California community. I am an interested citizen and. have
a desire to serve "my community."
I believe I am amply qualified to serve on this
commission. My education and work experiences have provided directly
relevant background that would be applicable to issues, decisions
and concerns that might come before this panel. (Please see
attached resume.)
I un~tand that ~y or ~ in~rm~n on ~ ~rm m~ he verified. I consent to ~e release of th~
/ ' // .
~GNATUR~ -~'~"~ -'~Z~~ DATF: M~ 27, 19q7
PLEASE NOTE~. Apphc~io" ~ ~' m ~ be ke~ on fi~ ~£ co~ider~ion of ~ture ~cancies.
R~urn to: Ciw C!erk's O~ 432~ B~iness Park Drive (909) 694-~~ OR
Mail to: P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589-9033
r:\commis~ppforrn
PAMEI .A ANN POWEI.I.
44727-E La Paz, TemeeuJa, California 92592
H~ (909) 099-10B3
Education:
University ot~ San Diego, Post Graduate
Lawyers Assistant Certificate, ABA Approved; Honors
Graduated December 1993, Specialty: Corporate, Real Estate, and
Environmental Law
University of Arizona, Tucson
Palomar college, AA, RN.
Special Licenses:
Department of Real Estate, Sales Associate since 1977 (inactive)
California Board of Registered Nurses since 1977 (inactive)
Work Experience:
9/94-?resent RI'V-ERSIDE COUNTY CONSOLIDATED
SUPERIOR AND MUNICIPAL COURTS
Senior Judicial Office Assistant 112/96 to present)
Judicial Office Assistant II-Deputy Court Clerk (9/94 to 12/96)
6/04-12/96 TIERRA FINANCIAL
Real Estate Sales Associate and Loan Consultant
1/94 to 9/94 LAW OFFICES OF CON]L4D, FRIDAY & WAGNER
Paralegal; legal research, file management, client contact, calendar management, file
review and office organization
6/93 to 6/94- MAIN STREET FUNDING GROUP, INC
Loan Consultant
10/93 to 1~93- LAW OFFICE OF SEBASTIA2V DiAMICO
Paralegal Intern; legal researcli, com-t search
9/90 to
9/91-FASTRAX DEVELOPERS SERVICES
Regulatory. Compliance Officer/Land Use Consultant to PACTEL CELLLq. AR
for cell site development
6/86 to
6/93-COLDWELL BANIx.~R, REALTY WORLD, and
WEST COUNTY INVESTMENTS
Real Estate Associate and Property Manager (Commercial & Investment)
'**References and Complete Education Profile Available
CITY OF TEMECULA
APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO BOARDS, COMMIT rEF_.S AND COMMISS}ONS
Qualification Requirement: 'Resident'of the City*of Temecula. ~
BOARD, COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU WISH TO SERVE: PLANNING COMMISSION
NAME: RON GUERRIERO
YEARS RESIDENT OF TEMECULA 10
ADDRESS: 41510 CHENIN BLANC 92591
HOME PHONE: 676-6150
WORK PHONE: 695-6390
OCCUPATION: ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH & SAFETY / HAZARDOUS MATERIALS TRAINER
EMPLOYER NAME: H E A T (hazardous emerRencv action training)
EMPLOYER ADDRESS: 41510 CHENIN BLANC 92591
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND/DEGREES:
AA - SADDLEBACK COLLEGE, POLICE SCIENCE/BUSINESS
BA CAL STATE UNIVERSITY FULLERTON, CRIMINAL JUSTICE ADMIN. / SOCIOLOGY MINOR.
CALIF. REAL ESTATE COMMISSION, REAL ESTATE LICENSE.
CA. OFFICE 0F EMERGENCY SERVICES, STATE CERTIFIED HAZARDOUS MATERIALS INSTRUCTOR.
LIST ANYRIVERSIDE COUNTY OR OTHER CITY BOARD, COMMH'FEE OR COMB41SSION
ON WHICH YOU HAVE SERVED ANDTHE YEAR(S) OF SERVICE:
PUBLIC & TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION - SINCE 1990
Tk~ECULA/MURRIETA TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE - 4.5 yrs.
SEVERAL AD HOC COMMITTEES REGARDING TRAFFIC. TEMECULA PUBLIC SAFETY EXPO COMMITTEE.
ORGANIZATIONS TO WHICH YOU BELONG: (Professional, technical, community, service):
AMERICAN SOCIETY OF SAFETY ENGINEERS. CEO/EXEC. BRD TEMECULA VALLEY BALLOON & wine.
CA. POLICE OFFICERS RESEARCH ASSOCIATION. past pres./vice pres. BEARBACKERS TVHS
PETROLEUM ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION. Past brd. member Temecula Town Assoc.
BRIEFLY STATE WHY YOU WISH TO SERVE ON THIS BOARD OR COMMISSION, AND
WHY YOU BELIEVE YOU ARE QUALIFIED FOR THE POSITION. BE SPECIFIC (Use additional
paperifnecessm'y): Being a resisdent for 10 years, and very involved in community,youth
groups, High School groups, and the Public/Traffic safety commission since our city
incorporation, I feel very committed to its future growth. I believe I can assist
knowledgeably in public safety, and traffic infastructure concerns. As a retired
police ofcr. and current state contractor I understand the difficulties city staff
encounters, and feel I would be able to lessen that undertaking through my interaction
with the public. I also understand the time commitment of this position, and am
willing to fulfill that obligation. I am extremely proud, and feel very fortunate
to live in Temecula with all its attributes,and giving people, and would be honored
to serve in its tremendous future.
I understand that any or all information on this form may he verified. ! consent to the release of this
information for public information purposes.
PLEASE NOTE: Apphcatmns wdl be kept on file for consideration of future vacancies.
Return to: City C!erk's Office, 43200 Business Park Drive (909) 694~.~.~. OR
Mail to: P.O. Box 9033, Tomecula, CA 92589-9033
r:\comm~s~app£orm
CITY OF TEMECULA ' MAY ~ J. J~g7
APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO BOARDS, COM~ffTT~ AN"~_ ~~1_~.~
1 · ' Qualification Requirement: 'Resident of the City:of Temecula. ..... '. ~ ......
'~--' ~- /~ ik] i;4 i /~J~'~,/ /'~" ?'/~. I '5-:~ ~'
BOARD, COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU WISH TO SERVE:
NAME: Michael S. Naggar
ADDRESS: 43034 Agena At.
695-0324
HOME PHONE:
YEARS RESIDENT OF TEMECULA 5+
WORK PHONE:
619-492-5084
OCCUPATION: Solid Waste Enforcement/Code Enforcment Officer
EMPLOYER NAME: City Of San Diego Environmental Service Department
9601 Ridgehaven Dr
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND/DEGREES:
Emergency Mediaca/ Technician
P.O.S.T. PC 8.32
See attached for background
LIST ANY RIVERSIDE COUNTY OR OTHER CITY BOARD, COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION
ON WHICH YOU HAVE SERVED AND THE YEAR(S) OF SERVICE:
In my current position I work with various community groups in the
neighborhoods which I serve.
ORGANIZATIONS TO WHICH YOU BELONG: (Professional, technical, community, service):
Please See Attached
BRIEFLY STATE WHY YOU WISH TO SERVE ON THIS BOARD OR COMMISSION, AND
WHY YOU BELIEVE YOU ARE QUALIFIED FOR THE POSITION. BE SPECIFIC (Use additional
paper if necessary):
Please See Attached
I understand thnt nny or all information on this form may be verified. I consent to the release of this
information for public information purposes.
k. ·
PLEASE NOTE: Al~plications ~il be ke~ on file fpr c6~ideration of future vacancies.
Return to: CiW C!erk's Office, 43200 Business Park"Da~ye_ ~909) 694~.~.~. OR
Mail to: P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589-9033
5/21/97
r:\¢ommis\&ppform
Michael S. Naggar
43034 Agena St.
Temecula. CA 92592
(909)695-0324 hm
(619) 492-5084 wk
Council Members. City of Temecula C/O
City Clerk
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
May 20, 1997
To The Honorable Council Members:
Please consider my application for the upcoming planing commission vacancy. I am very anxious
to serve the city, and offer the following history and qualifications lrbr your consideration.
I have been in the real estate management and development field since 1980. During the mid
1980's 1 owned and managed one of the largest real estate management firms in the Torrance,
South Bay area of Los Angeles. My firm managed over 200 apartment buildings and commercial
space totaling over 2000 residential units, as well as 40,000 squar ft. of commercial space. In the
process of management I have acquired land, participated in the construction of apartment
buildings and condominiums, and have orchestrated the process from acquisition of land to
residents moving in. During this period I was involved with several boards, and committees in
the various neighborhoods of the properties I managed. In addition I was also a credentialed
teacher for the City of Torrance Adult School: scheduled to teach real estate management. I have
also been a candidate for the designation of"Certified Property Manager" with the Institute of
Real Estate Management. a national organization recognizing management excellence.
In late 1989, after much soul searching, I sold this business looking to change to a profession
where I could focus on serving others. I moved to the City of Big Bear Lake where I became a
Paid Call Firefighter. I also built a small cabin in the area.
I then moved to San Diego where ! got married, and a few months later learned I was going to be
a father. Knowing it was time to plant roots, I visited Temecula. 1 had past our town on the
freeway frequently en route from Big Bear to San Diego. My wife and I fell in love with the city
immediately and knew this is where we wanted to raise our family. I bought a home and have
been living here for the past 5 years. Since then I have purchased another home and have now
become a landlord. My roots are in/emecula as well as my financial future.
Currently I am employed with the City of San Diego as a Solid Waste/Code Enforcement Officer
with the Environmental Services Department. I have been with the City since 1993. I am familiar
with state and local codes as to environmental issues, and what 1 don't know. I 'know how to find
out. 1 also work part time as a Park Ranger for the Ortega Trail Park and Recreation District. I
serve as a Soccer Coach for the TVSA, and have been a police volunteer. I am currentIv running
for a seat on the Board of Directors for the Starlight Ridge Homeowners Association.
I am thoroughly committed to this town. and want to be of service to it in the areas I am capable
of. I truly do want to become a member of the Planing Commission so I can contribute to the
planing and growth of the city I have chosen to live the majority of my life. I am committed to
this town and to you as council members. Please consider me for this opportunity. You will not
be disappointed.
City of Temecula Planning Commission
BOARD, COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU WISH TO SERVE:
NAME: John Joseph Stanton YEARS RESIDENT OFTEM~CULA
ADDRESS: 27431 Senna Court
HOMEPHONE: (909) 308-0091
OCCUPATION: Production Supervisor
WORK PHONE: (909) 694-1695
/ Shipping & Receiving Manager
EMPLOYER NAME: Sunset Trails, Inc.
EMPLOYER ADDRESS:43205 Business Park Drive Temecula CA 92590
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND/DEGREES:
Harvard School of Architecture Summer Session 1991
Golf Course Design and Smalt. Harbours & Marina Design
California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo
B.S. Landscape Architecture 1990
qr~,4v Ahrn~d Proor.m; Pnrt~l~] & Spmin. Urban Planninm, Principals of Design
LIST ANY RIVERSIDE COUNT~ OR OTHER CITY BOARD, COMMI1'FEE OR COMMISSION
ON WHICH YOU HAVE SERVED AND THE YEAR(S) OF SERVICE:
This commission is the first which I have had the opportunity to serve.
ORGANIZATIONS TO WHICH YOU BELONG:(Professional, technical, community, ~rvice):
Hostellag International ( American Youth Hostels) - Volunteer Activities
American Society of Landscape Architecture - Associate Member
BRIEFLY STATE WHY YOU WISH TO SERVE ON THIS BOARD OR COMMISSION, AND
WHY YOU BELIEVE YOU ARE QUALIFIED FOR THE POSITION. BE SPECIFIC (U~ additional
paper if necessary):
Please refer to attached sheet.
I understand that nny or all informalion on this form may be verified. i consent to the release of this
information for public informalion purposes.
PLEASE NOTE.y'Application~ will be kept on file for consideration of future vacancies.
Return to: City Cierk's Office, 43200 Business Park Drive (909) 694-6444 OR
Mail to: P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589-9033
1997
r:\comm~s~pp form
As a resident and business owner in Temecula, I wish to serve on the Planning
Commission to apply my education and experience to the service of our community
and maintain the quality of life we enjoy in Temecula.
I believe I am qualified for this position because of the planning skills developed at
Cal Poly and the business skills developed as a small family-owned and operated
manufacturer. Through hands on urban planning experience with cities such as
Sacramento, working on their Downtown Redevelopment program, I was able to apply
the principals of environmental design. The project allowed me the opportunity to
apply my strengths in critical thinking in the development of a project statement and
objectives through background and historical research. Within the context of their
specific plan I was able to offer the Downtown Redevelopment Agency alternatives to
creating a viable and identifiable downtown center that offered the community -
residential, commercial and entertainment uses without loosing the identity of
Sacramento as a city as well as a state capital.
As a resident and business owner in Temecula I would be privileged to work with the
Planing Commission to grow into the future with a vision of providing the residents and
business owners opportunities for growth and maintain the quality of life we have
come to enjoy living and working in Temecula.
CITY OF TEMECULA
APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO BOARDS, COMMITTEF~
PLANNING COMMISSION
BOARD, COMMIl~EE OR COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU WISH TO SERVE:
NAME:
HAL ROZAKAS
ADDRESS: 45596 Masters Drive
HOME PHONE: 676 - 21 02
OCCUPATION:
EMPLOYER NAN[E:
YEARS RESIDENT OF TEMECULA 7
WORK PHONE:
General Buildinq Contractor
HR eONSTRUCTION COMPANY
EMPLOYER ADDRESS: (same as residence)
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND/DEGREES: Architectural Design (Mesa College)
Presently enrolled at California Babtist College
(w~]] ~mp]~t~ my mamter's ~tudies in Rthics and Philosoph~ in 1999)
LIST ANYRIVERSIDE COUNTY OR OTHER CITY BOARD, COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION
ON WHICH YOU HAVE SERVED ANDTHE YEAR(S) OFSERVICE:
Certified Arbitrator for the State of California
(Contractors State License Board)
ORGANIZATIONS TO WHICH YOU BELONG: (Professional, technical, community,
National Organization for Historic Preservation
BRIEFLY STATE WHY YOU WISH TO SERVE ON THIS BOARD OR COMMISSION, AND
WHY YOU BELIEVE YOU ARE QUALIFIED FOR THE POSITION. BE SPECIFIC (Use additional
~r~n~r~): Over 2,000 years ago, Aristotle observed that government came into
existence to provide the basic needs for society, but its continuation is only jus-
tified if it helps us to achieve a better life. While I make no claim to having
solved the problems of achieving that goal, I firmly believe in taking an active
approach toward community involvement and embrace the social compacts of our city.
Since there was no job description attached to this application, I don't really
know w~at is required or expected of a planning co~m%iss~ member. However, I look
forward to talking with the appropriate powers that be to further discuss how my
talents, skills and experience may best serve the needs Of Temecula.
I understand that any or all information on this form may be verified. I consent to the release of this
information for publi_~g.infot~ation purposes.
PLEASE NOTE: A[~gi;.atmns will be kept on file for consideration of future vacancies. --
Return to: City Clerk's Office, 43200 Business Park Drive (909) 694-~.~.~. OR
Mail to: P.O. Box 9033, Tomecula, CA 92589-9033
r:\commis\app form
'Qmdincaaon Requirement: Resident of the City of Temec~u~"~":~"-~-~- - .-.. '
BOARD, COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU WISH TO SERVE:
NAME: Marcia L. Slaven
ADDRESS: 30110 La Primavera St.
HOME PHONE: (909) 676 2507
OCCUPATION: Administrative
City of
EMPLOYER NAME:
450 E.
EMPLOYER ADDRESS:
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND/DEGREES:
AS Math & Science
AA Behavioral Science
YEARS RF. SIDE~ OF TEMECULA 2 2
WORK PHONE: (909) 765 2330
Secretary
Hemet
Latham Ave.,
Hemet, CA 92543
LIST ANY RIVERSIDE COUNTY OR OTHER CITY BOARD, COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION
ON WHICH YOU HAVE SERVED AND THE YEAR(S) OF SERVICE:
Presently serving on the Planning Commission for the past three years.
ORGANIZATIONS TO WHICH YOU BELONG:(Profess~nal, te~nical. community,~rvice):
Municipal Managers Assistants of Southern California
Community Association Institute
Phi Thot~ K~pp~ Honor $ocioty
BRIEFLY STATE WHY YOU WISH TO SERVE ON THIS BOARD OR COMMISSION, AND
WHY YOU BELIEVE YOU ARE QUALIFIED FOR THE POSITION. BE SPECI~C ~ additional
~r ~ necessary):
I believe that my length of residence here provides a good solid base
of historical knowledge which can be used positively in the pursuit of
well designed managed growth. My experience of the past three years
on the Planning Commission and my constant involvement with community
concerns prior has given me a broad knowledge base that will enable me
to make good decisions on behalf of the community. I have thoroughly
enjoyed my tenure as a commissioner and would like the opportunity to
continue to serve the City of Temecula.
I understand that any or all informalion on this form may be verified. ! consent to the release of this
information for public information purposes.
PLEASE NOTE: Applications willbe kel~ on file for consideration of future vacancies.
Return to: City Clerk's Office, 43200 Business Park Drive (909) 694=~-~-~ OR
Mail to: P.O. Box 9033. Temecula. CA 92589-9033
r:\comrms\appform
CITY OF TEMECULA ~. ;~ ~.( '; '..'
APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO BOARDS, COMMITTEES AND'COMMISSI~)I~S ",i'/'- ~' .
[[=~': ...... ii'= ~= . ' Qualification Requirement: Resident of the City of Temecula.=
BOARD, COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION ON WHICH YOU WISH TO SERVE:
NAME: /~-,~,4/~-'f7~ ~, ~ ~' YEARS RESIDENT OF TEMECULA ~
ADDRESS: ~/'~ q'7 /O/O h/E~.O /~),g). '~,,n~A='~M/..~ ~--~ ~.~.~5"~.~-~
HOME PHONE:
OCCUPATION:
EMI'LOYER NAME: '-"--
EMPLOYER ADDRESS: '"---
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND/DEGREES:
LIST ANY RIVERSIDE COUNTY OR OTHER CITY BOARD, COM341TTEE OR COMMISSION
ON WHICH YOU HAVE SERVED AND THE YEAR(S) OF SERVICE:
ORGA~ZATIONS TO WHICH YOU BELONG: ~rof~io~, techniC, communi~, se~ce):
BRIEFLY STATE WHY YOU WISH TO SERVE ON THIS BOARD OR COMMISSION, AND
WHY YOU BELIEVE YOU ARE QUALIFIED FOR THE POSITION. BE SPECIFIC (Use additional
paper if necessary):
I unde~md th~ ~y or M! ~fom~ion on th~ fo~ may be verified. I cogent to ~e rele~ of thB
informSion for public informSion pur~s~.
P~ASE NO~: Appli~tiom will be ke~ on file for~e~ion of future va~ci~.
Ret~ to: Ci~ C!erk's Office, 43200 B~in~ P~rive (909) 69~3
M~ to: P.O. ~x 9033, Tzmacula, CA 925~9-9033
r:\comrma\app form
85/27/1997 ],6:38 9E~J-506-B561 ,13K3Ti'ER -...i_ .,
EDUCATZOI~AT~ BACII:GROUND/DF, GREES:
LI~ Ah'Y RIVERSIDE C~ONTY OR OTHER CITY BOARD, COMMIITEE OR COMMISSION
ON WHICH YOU RAVE SERVED AND THE YEAB~ OF gERVICE:
ORGA. lq~-4,TIONS TO WHICH YOU BELONG- (labor:- k~,-l, ! ' *,~.,,,4, mmmuni~', service):
BI~n~'~'LY STATE WRY' YO~ 'WISH TO SERVE ON ~ BOARD OR COAJMISSION, AAID
WHY YOU BEL1EV~ YOU ARE QUAI 1FlED FOR ~ FOSmOlq. BE SlqK3FIC COs, ~-Vr~k--.~
plim" if"- y):
~ m: l'.O. Bea: 90:~, Tom4oda, CA 9:~589
ITEM '21
APPROVAl
C,T
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
City Council/City Manager
Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
June 10, 1997
SUBJECT:
Ordinance 97- Prima Facie Speed Limits on Certain Streets
PREPARED BY: ~Ali Moghadam, Associate Engineer - Capital Projects/Traffic
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE 97-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, AMENDING SECTION 10.28.010(d) OF THE
TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING PRIMA FAClE SPEED
LIMIT ON 1) WINCHESTER ROAD BETWEEN JEFFERSON AVENUE
AND DIAZ ROAD 2) PAUBA ROAD BETWEEN YNEZ ROAD AND
MEADOWS PARKWAY 3! DIAZ ROAD BETWEEN RANCHO
CALIFORNIA ROAD AND WINCHESTER ROAD 4) RANCHO VISTA
ROAD BETWEEN YNEZ ROAD AND MEADOWS PARKWAY
BACKGROUND:
Engineering and traffic surveys have been conducted to update the posted speed limits on the
roadway segments as shown on Exhibit "A". Section 40803 of the California Vehicle Code
(CVC) states that in order to enforce posted speed limits using radar, an engineering and traffic
survey must be conducted within a five (5) year period.
An engineering and traffic survey as described in the CVC, is a survey of the prevailing speeds,
accident records and roadway conditions not readily apparent to the drivers. Based on analysis
of the recent data, staff recommends that the existing speed limits remain the same and be re-
affirmed by the City Council.
The Public/Traffic Safety Commission has reviewed the new engineering and traffic surveys and
recommended that the City Council amend Section 10.28.010(d) of the Temecula Municipal
Code to re-affirm the existing speed limits as shown on Exhibit "A".
-I- r:~agdrpt\97\0610\spdlimit.ord/ajp
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
Attachments:
1. Exhibit "A" - Affected Roadway Segments
2. Ordinance 97-
3. Exhibit "B", Location Maps
-2- r:~agdrpt\97\0610\spdlimit.ord/ajp
EXHIBIT 'A"
"Name of Street and
Portion Affected
Winchester Road between
Jefferson Avenue and Diaz Road
Pauba Road between
Ynez Road and Meadows Parkway
Diaz Road between
Rancho California Road and
Winchester Road
Rancho Vista Road between
Ynez Road and Meadows Parkway
Declared Prima
Facie Soeed Limit.
Miles Per Hour
40
45
45
45
-3-
r:~agdrpt\97\0610\spdlimit.ord/ajp
ORDINANC£ ~?-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA, AMENDING SECTION 10.25.010(d) OF
THE TEMECI~A MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING THE
PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT ON 1) WINCHESTER ROAD
BETWEEN JEFFERSON AVENUE AND DIAZ ROAD 2)
PAUBA ROAD BETWEEN YNt~Z ROAD AND MEADOWS
PARKWAY 3) DIAZ ROAD BETWEEN RANCHO
CALIFORNIA ROAD AND WINCHESTER ROAD 4)
RANCHO VISTA ROAD BETWEEN YNEZ ROAD AND
MEADOWS PARKWAY
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN
AS FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, The City of Temecula finds and determines that from time to time it is
necessary to add or modify existing prima facie speed limits within the City for certain streets,
or parts of streets.
WHEREAS, the City conducts engineering and traffic surveys on its roadways in order
to determine the appropriate speed limit;
WWEREAS, the engineering and traffic surveys on the segments of roadways designated
in this Ordinance indicate that the speed limit should remain the same and, therefore, the intent
of the Council is to re-affirm the speed limits given the new engineering and traffic study.
r:\agdrpt\97~0610\spdlimit.ord/ajp
SECTION 1. Section 10.28.010(d) of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended
as follows to modify the declared prima facie speed limits only on the following streets:
"Name of Street and
Portion Affected
Declared Prima
Facie Speed l.imit,
Miles Per Hour
Winchester Road between
Jefferson Avenue and Diaz Road
40
Pauba Road between
Ynez Road and Meadows Parkway
45
Diaz Road between
Rancho California Road and Winchester Road
45
Rancho Vista Road between
Ynez Road and Meadows Parkway
45
Except as specifically set forth in this Section 1, all other provisions of Section
10.28.010(d) shall remain in full force and effect.
SECTION 2. Severability. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this
Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any
sentence, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the
validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance.
SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause
the same to be posted as required by law.
SECTION 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30)
days after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause
copies of this Ordinance to be posted in three designated posting places.
SECTION 5. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its
passage; and within fifteen (15) days after its passage, together with the names of the City
Councilmembers voting thereon, it shall be published in a newspaper published and circulated in
said City.
PASSED APPROVED AND ADOPTED this ~ day of~
, 1997.
-5-
Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor
r Aagdrpt\97\0610\~pdlimit.ord/ajp
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Ordinance No. 97- was dully introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting
of the City Council on the 10th day of June, 1997, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly
adopted and passed at a regtdar meeting of the City Council on the 24th day of June, 1997, by the
following vote:
AYES: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
r:\agdrpt\9710610\spdlimit.ord/ajp
LOCATION MAP
SPEED LIMIT STUDY
x~XHIBIT "B"
! $DJIY c
2 PA.~O B
LOCATION MAP
SPEED LIMIT STUDY
EXHIBIT "B"
ITEM -22
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FII~AI~ ,
CITY MANAGER .'~.~
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
AGENDA REPORT
City Council ~a~
Gary Thornhill, Community Development Director
June 10, 1997
Request for Annexation of Redhawk by the Redhawk Residents to the City of
Temecula and the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD)
Prepared By: Saied Naaseh, Associate Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council provide direction to staff
regarding the annexation for Redhawk and Vail Ranch
communities, and if appropriate waive City pre-zoning, annexation
and CEQA fees, and to pay all Local Agency Formation
Commission (LAFCO) annexation fees.
BACKGROUND:
In January 1997, staff received a petition supporting annexation from 121 Redhawk
homeowners and requesting that this matter to be presented to the City Council. An updated
request dated May 20, 1997 has also been included (refer to Attachment 1). The Redhawk and
Vail Ranch homeowners have contacted City staff on several occasions during the past few
years concerning the annexation to the City and TCSD (refer to Attachment 2). The Redhawk
community is now formally requesting that the City Council initiate the annexation of Redhawk.
Staff has also had several conversations with residents from Vail Ranch who seem very
interested in annexing to the City. However, their efforts have been less organized, primarily
because that area lacks a Home Owners Association.
DISCUSSION:
Both Redhawk and Vail Ranch are within Temecula's Sphere of Influence. Both communities
are partially developed with single family dwellings, parks , golf course, and schools. The
following are some of the factors that should be considered by the City before the initiating the
annexation of these areas:
Should Redhawk and Vail Ranch be considered for annexation, or at least pre-zoned, at
the same time?
Should all developed and vacant portions of the two communities should be annexed
at the same time? (If the undeveloped portions of these areas are annexed, the City
would have control over the expenditure of development impact fees collected here.)
R:\STAFFRPT~P,.EDHANN.CC 6/419'7 m 1
Should all City application processing fees relating to annexation should be waived by
the City_Council?
Should the City pay for all LAFCO annexation fees?
Should the City Council require the residents of both communities to demonstrate an
overwhelming support for their annexation? (Staff recommends some form of
community outreach program to both inform the residents and obtain the level of
support for the annexation.)
If the City Council directs staff to initiate annexation, staff will begin the process by beginning
a community outreach program, the Pre-Zoning of the area, and preparation of the Plan of
Services and the environmental documents. Staff would also provide information regarding
fiscal impacts of the annexation including those to the TCSD and other City services,
consistency of the project with the City's Annexation Guidelines, and existing entitlements and
Development Agreements in the project area.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The immediate fiscal impacts of these annexations are related to City and LAFCO application
fees and City staff time. The City fees for processing an annexation application is
approximately $10,000, LAFCO fees are approximately 85,000, and staff time is estimated at
$5,000 for a total of approximately $20,000. The only portion of these costs that the City
would actually have to directly pay are the LAFCO fees. The actual fiscal impacts of the
annexation of these communities will be determined by the Fiscal Impact Model after the exact
area of the annexation is determined.
Attachments:
Redhawk's Annexation Request Letter - Page 3
Redhawk and Vail Ranch Land Use Maps - Page 4
R:\STAFFRPT~I~E. DHANN.CC 6/3197 sa 2
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
REDHAWK'S ANNEXATION REQUEST LETTER
R: ~STA FFRPTX,.RE~ HANN.CC 6/3197
May 20, 1997
Temecula City Council
43174 Business Park Dr.
Temecula, CA 92590
Re: Friendly Annexation Of The Redhawk Community
In January the Committee For Annexation submitted a proposal for your worthy
consideration of a friendly annexation of the Redhawk Community. Included with
the aforementioned proposal was a modest sampling of resident support.
At the time the signatures were obtained the committee did not ascertain whether
the signees were registered voters. We have subsequently determined from
Riverside County that approximately 1200 ballots were mailed out for the CSA 143
vote. On this basis it can be assumed that three quarters of the Redhawk residents
of voting age are registered to vote.
It is-our sincere hope that you will be favorably disposed to our request for
annexation and we are eagerly looking forward to becoming a part of and
contributing to this wonderful community.
The Committee For Annexation
45436 Via Jaca
Temecula, CA 92592
January 7, 1997
Mr. Dave Hogan, AICP
Senior Planner, Planning Division
Community Development Department
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
Dear Mr. Hogan,
JAN 0 9 !997
By
This is in follow-up to my letter of December 26, 1996 concerning a proposal for friendly
annexation of Redhawk community into the City of Temecula.
The enclosed copy of request for friendly annexation of Redhawk community has been
updated and corrected to reflect changes to estimated dwelling units from 750 to 810 and total
number of existing parks from 2 to 1. Please substitute this copy for the drat~ that I sent you on
December 26, 1996. I have also enclosed 11 signed originals of"Petitions for Proceedings,"
which contain a total of 121 signatures of registered voters who live in Redhawk.
Thank you for your support. If you have any questions, I can be reached on (909) 676-
7484.
Sincerely,
Ronald F. Turco
FRIENDLY ANNEXATION
OF
REDHAWK
MASTER PLANNED COMMUNITY
INTO CITY OF TEMECULA
Purpose:
The purpose of this briefing package is to provide information to support a request for a
friendly annexation of Redhawk community-into the City of Temeeula.
This proposal is made pursuant to Part 3, Division 3, Title 5 of the California
government Code (commencing with section 56000, Cortese-Knox Local
Government Reorganization Act of 1985).
The specific changes of organization proposed are:
That the areas of the Redhawk Specific Plan, generally Iocateci south of
Highway 79 and east of Pala Road, be annexed to the City of Temecula~
and that these same properties be detached from Riverside County Service
Area 143 and annexed to the Temecula Community Services Dismet.
The reason for this proposal is:
To provide for increased service levels and a more efficiem response to
service requests for the residents and property owners in the Redhawk area
by becoming part of the City of Temecula and the Temecula Community
Services District, the nearest providers of municipal - type services within
the County of Riverside.
This proposal is consistent with the Sphere of Influence for the affected city and
district.
The area included in the request is inhabited by 12 or more registered voters.
A copy of the Petition for Proceedings signed by more than 5% of eligible
registered voters living in Redhawk is attached at TAB A.
(Revised 1/4/97)
History:
The entire project site, now known as Redhawk, was originally purchased by the Great
American Development Company for a raw land purchase of 1,270 gross acres for a price
of $15,100,000.00. Actual developable area consisted of 580 gross acres. The Great
American Development Company sold bulk lots to Redhawk (RDHK) Venture, the
developer, and seven merchant builders in April 1989. RDHK Venture, a California
limited parmership, became the master developer builder of approximately 970 gross
acres. RDI-IK Venture plans to build 1,988 single family dwelling units, 1,299 multi family
dwelling units and develop 13 acres for commercial use. The seven merchant builders
bought the remaining lots located on approximately 300 gross acres to build 901 single
family dwelling units. The majority of the tracts bought by the seven merchant builders
have been fully developed.
Redhawk has an approved Specific Plan and Development Agreement with Riverside
County that provides it with entitlement to build 4,188 residential units, including
detached, attached and apartments. Redhawk has a land use density of seven dwelling
units per acre. Planned infrastructure and major public improvements have been
completed, in accordance with Specific Plan 217 as administered by the County of
Riverside, for the entire project. Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions of
Redhawk Community Association were recorded for the record in Riverside County on
June 14, 1989.
Background:
Location:
Unincorporated area of the Southwestern portion of Riverside
County, east of Interstate 15 and south of the intersection of
Highway 79S and Margarita Road.
Land area:
1,270
13
182.7
692
gross acres (580 developable acres) planned for
residential use
gross acres planned for commercial development
gross acres described as Redhawk Golf Course
gross acres of land conveyed or offered for dedication to
a public agency or owned by Homeowners' Association,
public rights of way, unmanned utility properties or any
public or utility easements.
Market value of land as
of July 25, I990:
$144,600,000.00 (appraised value using a discounted cash flow
developmental analysis).
2
Estimated number of dwelling umts at build out:
Residemial Units
Single family
$150-245,00.00
Multi family:
(Condos & apartments)
$121-150,000.00
Total
Range in size of units:
Lot sizes:
Range in cost of units:
Master Developer/Builder:
Tract Map Nos:
Gross acres:
Number units:
Merchant Builders:
Tract Map No:
Gross acres:
Number of units:
No Planned
2,900
1,200
4,188
1,800 to 3,300 square feet
5,000 to 7,200 square feet
$121,500 to $245,000.00
Redhawk Vemures
23064, 23065, 23066, 23067
970
3,287
Seven
23063
300
901
30
100
Completed to date
810
0
810
Infrastructure:
Miles of paved roads:
Street sweeping
No. square feet of slopes, parkways,
medians, turf grass and park:
No. of street lights:
Solid Waste and Recycling Services:
School district:
Fire Protection:
Police Protection:
Library:
Parks:
26
12 times per year
Riverside County Contract (CSA - 143)
Cost $4,683 per year
1,298,277 square feet
Riverside County Contract (CSA - 143)
with Adame Landscaping
Cost $165,700 per year
272 lamp poles
Riverside County Contract (CSA- 143)
with Southern CA Edison
Cost $32,000 per year
810 dwellings
Riverside County Contract (CSA - 143)
with Waste Management of Inland
Valley
Cost $143,250 per year
Temecula Valley Unified School District
Redhawk Elementary School, Camino
San Jose
Station 84, Pauba Road
Sheriff's Department, Riverside County
Riverside County, Temecula Branch
4
Special Assessment Districts and Other Taxing Agencies:
Taxing A~encies
County Service Area - 143 (CSA - 143)
Landscape maintenance of public areas and
Redhawk signature fountain
Street lights
Street sweeping
County Service Area - 143 (CSA - 143)
Solid Waste and Recycling Services
Elementary School Debt Service
Riverside County Assessment District No. 159
(AD 159 Mello Roos) (Supplemental Rancho
Villages) State Highway 79S from Tract 20319 at
imersection Pala Road and Highway 79 east to
Butterfield Stage Road. District was formed to
finance construction of: sewer lit~ station and force
main, sewer trunk main, natural gas main,
Butterfield Stage Road, Margarita Road, Wolf
Valley Road, Wolf Valley Loop, sewer
improvements dePortola Road, realignment and
channelization of Temecula Creek, additional
traffic lanes in Highway 79S, bridge crossing
Temecula Creek at Pala Road, flood control
facility in Pala Road to Temecula Creek and
additional traffic lanes along east entrance and exit
ramps of the I-15 intersection with State Highway
79S.
Temecula Valley Unified Services District,
Community Facilities District No. 89-1 (CFD 89-
1) (Redhawk Me!lo-Roos Project). District was
formed to finance a portion of the direct costs of
developing public facilities for Redhawk. Facilities
which may be financed by CID 89-1 include
schools, reclaimed water facilities, landscaping and
day care facilities.
Water debt charges
Annual Cost/Dwelling
$114.00
191.00
195.00
497.00
726.00
257.00
Metropolitan Water Debt Service
Eastern Municipal Water Debt Service
Rancho California Water Division debt Service
EMWD Standby
MWD Standby East
Flood control storm water/Clearwater
Total Special Assessment Districts Cost
(67.00)
(69.00)
(98.00)
(12.00)
(?.00)
(4.00)
$1,980.00
Paid by Homeowner on an Annual Basis
Homeowner Associations (I-IOA)
Redhawk (all 810 homes)
Rancho Serrano (120 homes located in gated
community within Redhawk)
HOA fees pay for maintenance of six slopes
located in common areas of six developments in
Redhawk. Also residents of Rancho Serrano, a
gated community within Redhawk, pay an
additional HOA fee of $552.00 year to maintain
interior slopes, streets and entrance/exit security
gates.
,Annual Assessment
$360.00
$552.00
6
reclaimed water system
fire hydrants
All improvements were completed in accordance with Specific Plan No. 217 as administered by
the County of Riverside. Development of Redhawk community is a legal conforming use under
the Specific Plan. Therefore, annexation of Redhawk should result in no additional infrastructure
cost to the City of'Temecula.
8
PRINTED NAME MAIL~G AIX~ESS
;ach of serf or ~erse# states: I have ptrsonsliy affixed my ow~ siOnSaute to Ihls betlibrL pu-'riher, I am on e~i& room·red vot~
the County of Riverside. ¢all~omJ~ at the time of signinO and I hove correcUy wr~tee my plm:e o! residence heroon (for registered voter 1:,atelions
only). R~SIO~NCG means a number and street lidroll or description suffk:Jent for the Registrar of Voters to ioc·te property off · map. Post
Office Ix~x hUmp·rs or rome numbers CANNOT BE USED AND Wit· NOT BE ACGEPTED.
We ceilday we are registered voter· (or landowners, for · landowner peal·loft) of the arab de·crJlMcl in the attached map end we underuLund that
t~es~inne may not be cftcneared ·eperotAly from a current description of the area involved and 4 current map showing the oreo involved.
"-"-"-""--
,.~GN 14AMk
PHINI ~E
F~l~rl' NAME
PRI~ NAME
DAIk
JAil,-
.~e~L,~d~ ALX,~e..5~. (AJ-'N ~ L3reowam
~:i:~,L~_f~.b A&A.~Ir...La~ (A~N For L~ncJmm~ laelfoo~
~<~..~lL~ AL.Y~IE,%5 (;dan Fm ~ Pe~m~n)
DECLARATION OF CIRCULATION (To be completed after signatures have been obtained)
I am registered to vote in the County of Riverside, California. I circulated this petition and ·ew each of the appended signatures on this petilion.
being written. Each aigne~re on this petition is, to the best of my information ar .J~,.,.~o~Jef. the genuine signature of the person.Whose name
purports to be. All signatures on this document were obLlined between //-- //.~-'~' . and //
/!s0 ;":,
i cert,y under penalty or perjury under the Laws o! the State or ColafataL· that the foregoinO)~tnje and corr~f~ /
/ / Signlaura
Primed Name {incrude mklcl~e initial} Residence Addreee City State
PAGE 2 of 2
Wherefore, petitionerIs) J~luost(e) that prscoedln~ be take. In .cconfenco with the p~wf-in~e of Section 84000, et seq.. of the Government Co~a
and horswl~ ellix signatures(s) os lollawe:
THE CHINA~ P~nTIONERS OF ~ PROI~SAL ARE:
INet to exceed threa)
PRINTED NAME MAILJNG AIXJRE$S
~sch o se# or herJeff states: I have IMrSonalty affsxecJ my own signaCura to this petition. Further, I am an eligble registered voter o~
the County of RivenMe, C&lffomis at jiu lime or signing and ! have correctly written my place of residence heroon (for register~S voter petjilofis
only). I~SID~NG~ means · fi~mber end street oddMss o~ deecrll}tlon sufficient for b Registrar of Voters to Jocate proJ~rty on a map. Post
Office box numbers or route numbers GANNOT B~ USED ,e~fD Wll.k NOT BE ACCePTeD.
We certify we are registered voters (or tendowners, for 8 landowner petJiM) of b ars8 descrjiMd In the attached map end we understand II~t
thes/O.'lMtitions may not be circulated Selmretely tram a current description of IIM area Invoked and · current map showing the area Involved.
~. .,.~.~ ))~,~d~ j ////// ~ JO-'7~.'.:.';~'"4:...,':t:~-~l~. :,:t.?fr'~,.. ..-7-7~. :.--. .-~,., .,.,. ,
w - . Te-'::/ /" / 7-o
-
DECLARATION OF CIRCULATION (To ba completed after signatures have been obtained)
I am registered to vote in the County of Riverside, ¢alJiomla. I circulated thla petition end saw each of the appended slgn&turs8 on this petition
belf~- written. Each ,tgnature on this petition la, to the best O! my kllormatiOll end bella,, the.genuine signature o! t~l//~% wh0$e name
pt ~,to IM. All signatures on thl~ document ware obtained between /~--/C/ /191 ~/' , and -- 109 ,~
I ¢ ~Jnder penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of C&ljiomla that the Iorsgoin0(.J~/true end corrscL /~--~,
// Signatur~
Printed Nam~ (Mclude mlcMla initial) ReJid~nce Addra~s City Slate
PA~E J of J
Wherefo~, puimon.~o) ~-.rd4stie) IMt proem4,..~'-
and herswit offlz slgnotures4s) os Iolinws:
PRINTED NAME
2.
~e Co~ of R~e~. ~lomh st b ~e of s~n~g end I ~ve ~ w~ my pb~ of res~e he~ (for Mgbte~ voter ~s
on~ ~NG~ means 8 numar ~ s~t ~dms8 or ~sc~ su~bnt ~ ~ R~r of Vote~ M ~M pm~ ~ 8 map. Post
0~0 ~x num~ or ~ num~ ~NOT BE US~ ~D ~ ~T BE ~
~ be taken In accordimam wit le Iuuvlslono o'/' %t- Icm ~400Q, el seq.. of the Govern~,t
TI~E CHIEF PETTr10NERS OF THIS PROPOSAL AJqE:
~1ot to exceed mine)
Id~l. JNO IId3C~ES$
We certify we are registered voters {or Ian~;Jo?,~l.~'~l landowner petition) of the am described h the attached map and we understand that
~ese .pellticms may no~be cl.n:ulat.ed se~r~a current Cleacrtptlon o! the area involved arid a current map showing the area invo~ed.
l
DECLARATION OF CIRCULATION (To be completed after signatures have been obtained)
I am registered to vote in the County of Rlveriide, C&lifomL-. i circulated this IMtltJon and IeW each of the aPlMnded sJgnattJres on this
betn;~ wrillen. Each signature on this petttidn h, to the best or my information and belbf, the genulr~ signature of the person whose name
pUrlDOffS to ~:)4. All Signatures on this document were obtained belwe, an · ~',~./~---,:,('~; 100 ~, . and , /U~.
I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State or Call(orals that h foregohg is true and corre. cL~ _~__
'~'//~'"~ ~/' ('~/~/%'6/ ~S~-././. sure ~'~-
:'tinled Name (include mlclclle klitial) ~'~" ~'~'~'/'~/~ !
Residence Addree~ C~/' State
PAGE 2 of 2
~ot m exe~ ~)
PRI~ NM ~NO
~e Coun~ d R~eo~ Oafflash at ~ ~ of s~n~g e~ I ~o ~ ~ my p~ of restnee h~n flor ~te~ voter
ofi~ ~S!~ mo.~ · n~r a~ smt ~Ms8 or desc~ s~bnt br ~ R~r of Vote~ M ~te pm~ ~, took Post
O~e ~z ~mM~ or ~ numM~ ~NOT BE US~ ~D ~ NOT ~ ~
We certify we &~e registered voters (or isndowners. for · landowner petJtkm) of ~h4 am deKrbod in ~e a~tJch~J map and we unclersLund that
the~edpeUtJona may not be circulated separately from · currunt clescrlpticm o! t~o ifil in¥o~fed I~d · curTent map showinG the er~a Isysired.
DECLARATION OF CIRCULATION (To be completed after signatures have been obtained)
I am registered m vote Jn the County of Riverside, C&b~omL-. I clrcuistod this petition and saw each of the appended aign&~res on thh petition
being wrifierL Each signature on this petition is, to the best or my informaiM end b~liif, the genuine sionature o! the person whose n~me it
,purp~ ~,be. Ait signatures on thls document ware obLuined between ,.~.p;trd..Z.~, llO~ , and -J,..~/'~, /~,/
J car. :Jar penaffy of perjuly under the LlWa of the Still of California that the foregoing ~ tfiJe. Jnd coFrecL
/ Signature
)rinled Name (include middle initial) Residence Address '~lty / Shill Zip
PAGE 2 of 2
~ecn o('ue lee ramseft or nerue# 0rates: I ~uve peruonelly eff,-e4 my ow~ o~gf~uJre to thh peruton. Fum~er, 6 am on ei~it)t. reg~teroa voter o~
the County of RIvemhM, ¢ol#omb at ~ ~l of o~nhg 8~ I ~ve go~ ~ my p~ of ms~e ~n (for ~lsto~ voter ~o
on~ ~S~CE me8~ 8 ~m~r 0~ sU~t ~dms8 or des~tM 8~bfit ~ b R~r of Voters ~ ~lt pm~ ~ i map. Post
~0 ~E numM~ or ~ fi~ ~NOT BE US~ ~D ~ NOT BE ~
We cefi~ we a~ ~g~Mr~ voMrs (or ~~. br 8 bnd~r ~) of h ~ ~K~ ~ ~ m~c~ m~ and we unde~ ~t
~es4 .~fft~s may not ~ ci~MI~ 8~rate~ f~m a cur~ desc~ of ~ oreo bvo~ a~ · cu.ent map 8~hg ~e a~a ~vok~
DECLARATION OF CIRCULATION (To be completed after signatures have been obtained)
I am registered to vote in the County of Riverside, ¢&lifomlL i circulated this petition ond sow each o! ~he eppended aigneture$ on this petition
b~Ing wrifien. Eech signature on this petRion is, to the best of my informetlon and belief, the genuine e~gneture oftf)e person whose name I~-'
putperil to b4. All aigno~Jres on this document were obtained behveen Jo,,.,~ .~.) 199 /'~ . end z/o,4~ ~_-~ 199 ..~
I certify under penalty or perjury under the ~wa of the State of Cliffemro thot the forK~ true end correct.
2,,/ ""--' Signetufo
'rinted Name (include tolddie initial) Residence Address CI~ State Zip
PAGE 2 of 2
' ' ' be Mke~ In f~cofdoaou wills tim IMUvisloao ~ '~ ~, el ~. of ~ ~e~,t ~e
?,_ CHIEF P~11I~S O~ ~ ~0~ ~
PR~ N~E ~0 ~ESS
~ocn oi us ior n~se~ or ~ff sams: t ~e ~ ,a~ my o~ .~mm u ~ ~m~ Fu~r. i am on el~m f~M~ vomr od
ofi~). MS~N~ m~8 a numar ~ I~ut ~ll Or desC~ sugar ~ b RMhUr of vo].~ ~ ~t. pmM~ ~ · ml~.
O~o ~z numM~ or ~ n~ ~NOT H ~ ~D ~ NOT BE ~~
,_
Printed Name (include m~dl~ inithr~ Relk[ence Address C~ S~IE ~p
PAGE 2 of 2
Ice, rider penalty of perjury under me S-ws of ms SLuts of C&llfomis mat the fomgoing~s ~e and correct. ~
E.~.,ed., ~-~ ~"- . cA o,, ,./,,.,..,.~ /~' .,,6. -./(-~,,,~ .,4-/,.~
beings,irE=fl. Each lign4ture on aim petition is. to the best o! my Inforrna( _k)n and boiler. the genuine sign,tture of
put o1~. Allslgns~resonmisdocumentweraobtainedboeween 4~/(,M,q~_ /.) lll..~,ip.~., and
DECLARATION OF CIRCULATION CTo be completed =tier sign=tures h=ve been obtained)
I am registered to vote in the County of Riverside. C&lJfomie. I circuLutnd thll PetlfJon and iiw each of the appended signatures on this petition
end hemwith ef~ eig~m~e(a) is ~: "-~,
~ ~ ex~ ~)
me Co~ ~ K~e~ Clhml it ~ bl Of I~ ~d I Mve ~ w~n my p~ of ms~e M~ (for ~teM voter
on~ ~S~NCE me~ a n~r ~ s~Nt ~N88 Of des~t~ s~bnt ~ ~ A~b~r of Voile ~ ~to pm~ ~ a map. Post
O~* ~z n~ or ~e num~ ~NOT BE US~ ~D ~ NOT ~ ~
We certify we are registered vol. rs (or inndowners. !or I ~r ~) of ~e a~ ~sc~ ~ ~ a~c~ map a~ ~ ~e~ ~1
may not ~u~l~N~tt~ from a ~nt desc~n ~ ~ area ~vo~ a~ a cu.~t map shrug ~e ams ~vo~
~0. ~ ~ . II, I . ~1~
....
DECLAP, AT]ON OF CIRCULATION (To be completed after signatures have bHn obtained)
I am registered to vote in th~ County of Riverside, California. I clrcutatod this petlUon and saw each of the appended aigrmturee on this petition
brairig w~itten. Each sigrmmre on ~hll petriion is, to the best of my informst!~)~l end belbf. the genuine signature of th~ person wh~ose name Jt --
pu~rls Io be. All signatures on this documenl were obta~ed behveen ,/0,4..~ :~-/~-.-1tl ~:~ . led ~' /~-),~ /-- / ~ ¶IS ~
I certify under p~nalty of perjury under the isws of the State of Callfomil that the fomgoing"Ti'l~e end corzect,
/2.,,~ __ ~ S~nsture
Printed Name (include middle initia0 Reek:lance Address Ctty State Zip
PAGE 2 of 2
~e Coun~ ~ R~e~ Ca~omh it ~ ~e of s~n~g ~ ! ~vo ~ w~ my ph~ ~ msb~ ~r~n (for ~hte~ voMr ~lll~8
on~ ~SI~CE me~8 · numMr I~ s~t ~m88 or ~sc~ subfit br ~ R~r of Vote~ M ~te pm~ ~ 8 m.~. Post
O~e ~z numM~ or ~ num~m ~NOT BE US~ ~D K NOT BE ~
We cefil~ we are ~giste~ voters (or ~~, br 8 ~r ~M) of be am desc~ ~ ~ 8~ mip Ind we ~en~ ht
~ese .~i~n~y not ~ ci~u~t~ seMmte~ f~ 8 cu.~t desc~t~n of b ires hvo~ ~d a cunent m~ uh~mg ~e 8m8 ~vo~
DEClARATiON OF CIRCULATION (To be completed after signatures have been obtained)
I am regislered tO vote in !~e County of Riverside, California. I circulartel this petition end saw each of the appended signatures on this petition
heine -'oifien. Each signature on this petEion h, Is flue b4at of my bformaUo9 and bobf, the genuine signature of ~e whose name #
put ~ b4. All s~natures on thh document were obtained b4tween i~'~.~,c/~// 100 ~ om:J c-/~/~r~°fi/( 100 ~-~ .
I co. ~der penalty of p~rjury under the laws o! the State of ¢&l~romfa that ~ ror~oing Re and correct. /
Printed Name (include mk:ldte inillar)
Resk:Jence Address
PAGE 2 of 2
Signature
SLate Zip
Wherelorn, I~dlJonI4S) raiNsaKs) Ore( procar
· ~d helmwith ~ signllums(s) M ~
THE CHIEF PLrTTTIONERS OF 11dIS PROPOSAL ~
~ Io exceed Sirroe!
PRINTED NAME MAILING AJaRESS
the County o/Rlvento~ ¢llltomtl II the lime of sioJIIng Ind I Imvl cofNc~ wfllle my piles of relll:ldNv~ hemon (for registered rotor pBIItlof~
only). RES#~NCE mear~ · number mvl street idamss or description ·ufflcimn( for the Registrar of Vc4er8 to Iocato probefry off, meG. Post
Office box numbors or route numbers rAIdNOT BE USEZ) AND WI.L, NOT BE A~.Bl-lr.u.
We certify we e~e ~glsto~d voters
.,.y not b,_
~. ~ ,~ ~ ~ . .~. ._~ v~ ~, -c,~,=..., ~ .... ~ /
11.
3Alic
/, -//
DECLARATION OF CIRCULATION ~1'o be completed after signatures have been obtiined)
I am reglslered to voto hi itel County of RJvlrslde. Callfomla. I ciKulilecl thl~ petRion Ind IIW lath of the Ipl~fided slgnitUml on thll petit·off
being writtan. Each siormture off this petition is, to Ihl best of my irlformat~pn and belj4f, the genuinl signature of thai P4rsQ,-whose name
purlx)r~s to be. All signalres on ~is document were ob*-,k~ld belw~erl &./~.)'~/~ / 191 & , Ifld ~../~,,~./G,, /// 111 ~__.
I certif~ under penalty of perjury under ~e Llwl of the SL~ts of C·11fomla that the fomgol'~ true and correct.
Prinled Name (include m~dle initial)
Signitum
Rilldents Address City State
PAGE 2 of 2
MAJLINO AIX~ES$
i~cn ~1 us tot turn·ell or Its·ell'sUm: i tuwe Pelf·hilly mfflAed my o~ia sig/mlum Io mi~ I)~t~gm. Furll~r. iem on eligd)ll rogiilef~ v~ ~]~
We County o4' Riverside, ¢&lffomll at lbs time of signing 8fid I have corystay wdfiml my piece of residence be·on (for resistarid voter petitions
only). RESIDENCE means m number arKI $l~o4t oddrs# or deicdpUolt sufTIghnt br ~ RogJ~tmr of Volers Is k)cate pro!Mrq off · mop. Post
Ofi'k:a box noraMrs or rome numbers CANNOT BE USEZl AND WILL NOT BE A~EPTE~.
certify we ere rtOistered voters (or landowners, for · J~ldownir petltJMt) of b ired descrJbe(f in lite eltoch~d map arid we u~derstand that
I~eae 4Mtl~lons may not be cin:ulted S·lMritely from · current description of ~te at# Ilwoived m~l · curtant map showing bte erie involved.
~,~ ....... ' ' ~ ~ ' ~' , '. -,i" - .... ' '~-' '
~-~ ~, ~ /d. ' ~,, ~- -~ ~ f i . ..T,~,-~ ~ u l~ c ~ _,....e ~, ~-~ ~ ~ .~ --~ -~ ~
DECLARATION OF CIRCULATION (To be completed after signatures have been obtained)
I am registered to vote in ~· County of Rivereld·, C·lifomlL I circulated I~Js IMtltJon and sew each of ~o appended signatures on ~is PetitJori
pu, ',~be. AIIslgnsturesonmlsdocumentweraobt, uinedbetwoe. /~/~ /...~ 1#~.__, end :'~'f2"~[Z. ,~'- .
~Prinled Name (Include m~dLo initial}
Signature
Res~ence Address C~ S~te
PAGE 2 of 2
Whefelom. pllJ#Mtmde) met(el IhiI F4IIi lion IIO00. et ~ of ere Government C~i
~ hMIWNh Ifib eMnItUfe~(8) N Ioimis:
PRINTED NAME
THE CHIF Pl:.,,~ IIEP. I OF lWS PROPOSAL ARE:
Mot to era:M4 Imie)
MMJIG ADOREIS
inly not Be cl/gUlitia lelIIrliely hem · currefit discrip#off of Ihe &fel involved Ind I CUITIfit rail) 8howlng the &fee kwolved.
DECLARA~ON OF ClRCULA33ON (To be completed Ifter slgniturts hive blln obtiined)
I im regiaterod to VOle in h Colff~ly Ot Riverlb, ClEoml. I eif~ulAIod 11~lA pMJtlo~ Mid law IlCh 01 b IppllM$ld Iigrlltufel on Ihh I~tJtJoa
being wrifien. EIch ligature
purports to b.. All i~nemfel 2 Ih~ petilion k, t0 Ihe best o! my klformitkNt I~niture of lb. I)4[~ofi w. hose nIme I
Ihli document were oMoined belwein Z- 8nd bl~l, h O~uine
I certify under penalty o! p~rju~ under the laws of Ihe SIAM of ColfromMIbl foreook~ k 7Fe Ind correct.
/.., .,,, :t' a co . .
!Printed Name (include middle initial) Residence Addfell City St411 Z~
PAGE 2 of 2
ATTACHMENT 2
REDHAWK AND VAIL RANCH LAND USE MAPS
R:\STAFFRPTXREDI'IAI'qlq. CC 6/3/97 m 4
i
Bulltdiehl $1&$e ,,,'.,
// ,f' .... ";;' .,.: , /.
I i,
<Z
< ~
pT,i~NNTNG
COI~MTSS?ON
Chairman Fahey questioned the impact if the car wash was not part of the project. Mr. Markham replied
the applicant typically has a car wash facility with his stations and the project would probably not go
without the car wash.
Commissioner Miller asked how much noise will be heard by a neighbor 100 yards from the car wash.
Mr. Markham replied the noise will be below the ambient noise of Margarita Road, and he will accept
a condition the car wash shall not be within 200' of a residential zone.
Commissioner Soltysiak questioned timing of gasoline deliveries. Mr. Markham replied deliveries in a
peak season occur about 23 times a month and typically in the evening, but can be tailored to whatever
is required.
Commissioner Miller asked if a right-out-only rum from the car wash wouldn't make traffic worst because
traffic is then forced to exit on Yukon. Mr. Markham stated he did not see exits from the car wash as
a major concern.
Chairman Fahey called for a recess at 8:18 P.M. The meeting was reconvened at 8:29 P.M.
Commissioner Webster asked why Mr, Michael only received a copy of the general plan. Ms. Ubnoske
stated, staff xeviewed traffic and noise impacts and determined the project is consistent with the General
Plan's traffic study, which was done for the entire city. Mr. Hogan stated a negative declaration was
approved by the County when the Center was built; staff reviewed the General Plan EIR which address'
impacts. He also advised that Mr. Michael will be given a copy of the initial study.
Chairman Fahey stared her thoughts are: this use is allowed at this location; the developer has attempted
to mitigate any adverse effects; she and she would support the project with the following additions: no
lights spill past the properly lines; tankers to come thru the center at a time having the least traffic impact
(staff to determine); a chambered basin is to be installed; The car wash acoustic impact will not exceed
ambient standards; staff directed to determine if it is possible to lower the canopy height; operating hours
shall be 6AM to midnight; and increase the size of trees on Yukon, with a majority being evergreen.
Commissioner Webster stated a tile roof is inappropriate as the other buildings have metal roofs; and
shrubs should be placed outside the wall.
Commissioner Slaven said her comments are: The design is not in the best interest of the community or
people living in the vicinity; she supports the lighting/noise-impacting-homes arguments; and are not
certain the guarantees are enforceable; The existing landscape was put in to mitigate noise, but according
to residents doesn't; The design does not allow for ease of use; is not pedestrian friendly; does not include
any of the village concept ideas; and should not be a 24-hour operation.
Commissioner Soltysiak stated his thoughts are: the project is consistent with the General Plan; internal
traffic congestion relates to Lucky's, and the Lucky's and Albertson Centers being built to the south
should relieve this area.
Commissioner Miller said a gas station will meet the auto needs, homeowners and he supports the project
as it in compliance with zoning.
R: \PLA~CO~q\HINUT~$\1997\4-7-97.I4PD 6/2/97 vgw
6
Mr. Markham reiterated the applicant is agreeable to amended conditions except for the hours of
operation as the station works most efficiently on a 24-hour basis, with maintenance, upkeep and cleaning
being performed in the early hours.
Chairman Fahey stated she cannot support a 2,C-hour operation based on the noise impacts on the
surrounding areas.
It was moved by Commissioner Slaven to deny Planning Application PA96-0345 based on the best interest
of the people in the area due to negative impacts to their health, safety and welfare, and because the
hours of operation exceed midnight. The motion died for lack of a second.
It was moved by Commissioner Miller, and seconded by Commissioner Soltysiak, to approve Planning
Application PA96-0345 as previously conditioned at the March 13, 1997 Planning Director meeting and
as augmented tonight-i.e, no light spills past the property lines; installation of a special catch basin;
acoustic impact not to exceed ambient parameters; canopy height to be as low as possible and still
accommodate vehicles; trees to be 24" box, of an evergreen majority, along the properry's perimeter;
shrubs to be located outside the wall; if a left-turn lane from Margarita Road into the Center is
established, the fuel trucks must utilize that entrance; establish hours of fuel delbery to minimize noise
impact; -- and staff direction to return at the April 21, 1997 Planning Commission meeting with a
resolution containing the findings.
The motion failed as follows:
AYES: 2
NOES: 3
ABSTAIN: 0
COMMISSIONERS: Miller, Soltysiak
COMMISSIONERS: Slaven, Webster, Fahey
COMMISSIONERS None
Commissioner Miller, "I move the approval of Planning Application... and as those conditions have been
augmented and amended tonight..."
Chairman Fahey, "...Clarification on the conditions was...tanker coming through the center vs Yukon
with an appropriate time to be determined in the daytime limitation in low traffic times in the center, but
not nighttime."
Assistant City Anomey Weiner, "You may want to discuss actually what the appropriate time at this point
because there may be a disagreement among the people voting on the motion on that."
Commissioner Webster, "Give a time range."
Chairman Fahey, "10 A to 4 P."
Commissioner Miller, "This is petrol deliveries; if I inadvertently made that a part of my motion,
apologize. I think it is an inherently bad idea to run a gas truck through that parking lot .... "
R: \PLANCOMM\MINUTE$\1997\4-7-97.WPD 6/2/97 v~ 7
'L~TNTNG COI~f?SSTON D~'~]~,Y S, ~1997
Chairman F~ey, "...~e ~o ~ngs ~der di~ussion ~e ~e ~ ~rough ~e tenor vs ~ound Yukon
~d then the hours ~ f~ ~ delive~ of ~el. Does ~e m~er of the motion w~t to cl~ whm ~ey
intended for that condi~on?"
Co~issioner Miller, "Until there is a left-ram line provided..."
C~m F~ey, "The next question w~ hours of deliver. I ~ ~gge~ed ~a ~ff deterinc hou~
of delive~ that would ~ hM ~e le~t noise imp~t to eve~ng ~d nigh~me hou~ m f~ ~ a t~ck
comng in ~ere. And someone ~ked ~at we cl~ ~ for di~ussion ~d so I pulled numbers out of
the hat which were 10 A to 4 P. Is it, would you like ~at not to ~ in ~ere?"
Commissioner Miller, "I don't ~ow ~ it if we ~e ~ng a~ut w~ting to reduce t~ffic, I would
~me it should be at the laer hours."
~ssioner Sol~si~, "I ~i~ ~e concern a~ut ~e l~er hours is how much noise it would m~e."
Commissioner Miller, "Perh~s we should Md ~ Mdifion~ condition ~at I don't ~ow ~at ~is
happens, but when ~e t~cker is ~ere to drop ~e ~el...~ere is no noi~ involved."
Chai~ F~ey, "Probably you need m cl~ most...~e you m~ing a motion ~at included limi~
hours or does not include limited hours?"
Co~issioner Miller, "I ~ not m~ing ~at p~ of my motion."
Chai~ F~ey, "So the m~r of ~e motion would not include ~y limi~ to ~e hours. Does ~e
second concur wi~ that?"
~ssioner Sol~si~, "I don't ~ I ~ ~owl~geable m m~e ~ de~ination...our intent which
is to minimi~ the imp~t."
Ch~ F~ey, "Do you have a problem wi~ staff m~ing ~az."
Co~issioner Miller, "Not at ~1."
Ch~m F~ey, "Staff work on minimizing ~e noise ~d trYtic imp~t by n~owing down the hours
of ~el delive~..." Do you agr~ ~at ~ose ~e ~e conditions ~at you were requesting, second..."
The motion did not p~s.
Commissioner Webster, "I'd like to move to m~e ~e s~e motion, but ju~ to chmge ~e hours of
operation till 12 o'clock midnight for ~e g~ station."
Ch~ F~ey, "So what about the opening time?"
Co~issioner Webster, "~ening time I w~t m cl~ ~is. ~y rout, my time just ~at ~e hours
of operation end at 12 midnight... begi~ing of 6 AM."
R: ~P~CO~MINUT~1997~4-7-97.~D 6/2/97 v~ 8
pr,ANNTNG COMMT~TON
Chairman Fahey, "We have a motion for of the previous motion and conditions with one additional
condition that the hours of operation are 6 AM to midnight. Is there a second?"
Commissioner Webster, "Actually, let me modify that. Speaking more of a 5 AM to 12 midnight due
to the number of commuters .... "
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 3
NOES: 2
ABSTAIN: 0
COMMISSIONERS: Miller, Webster, Fahey
COMMISSIONERS: Slaven, Soltysiak
COMMISSIONERS None
Forest City Workshop (Mall Project-Winchester/Ynez/Margarita Roads)
Community Development Director Gary Thornhill presented a summary of the project's background.
Associate Planner Matthew Fagan presented the staff report.
Chairman Fahey questioned the review of the environmental impact report. Mr. Fagan stated the pro,.:
appears to be consistent with the parameters of the EIR.
Cola Macken, representing Forest City Development, stated the power center elevations will be ready
by June 2, 1997, and it is hoped elevations of the anchor stores will also be ready at that time.
Jim Heller, KA Architects, Cleveland, stated the anchor department stores will do their own designs as
they will own the buildings, but will work with Forest City to develop an integrated design scheme. Mr.
Heller explained the site plan.
Tom Gmover explained the design study model illustrates patios, landscaping, and activity space (football
fie]d-size) for special community and tenant events. He also displayed the proposed materials and colors;
explained how each major courtyard will have a different theme, and how building fronts/backs will be
designed to resemble a main street, with each tenant having an opportunity to customize their individual
entrance.
Phil Milsap, Mason Design, provided overall landscaping information and stated the landscaping is based
on the approved Specific Plan.
Mr. Macken stated the power center is an integral pan and economically makes the development work.
He said it will extend to North General Kearny Road, which is larger than previously shown, and will
have the same architectural features as the front of the mall. Mr. Macken mentioned an approved sit
plan should be ready by the June 2, 1997 hearing.
R:\PLANCOMM\MINUTE$\!997\4-7-97.I4pD 6/2/97
ATTACHMENT NO. 5
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
APRIL 7, 1997
R:\STAFFRPTL~$PA~.CC1 §/3/~7 dwh '~ 6
TO:
FROM:
Planning Commission ~
Debbie Ubnoske~; Planning Manager
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
April 7, 1997
SUBJECT:
Appeal of Planning Director's Approval of Planning Application No. PA96-0345
(Development Plan) - Shell automobile service station, car wash, convenience
mart, and a Kentucky Fried Chicken fast food restaurant with drive through
service, at the southwest corner of Margarita Road and Yukon, within the
Palomar Village Shopping Center
Prepared by: Carole K. Donahoe, Project Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
Review and consider the issues of concern raised by Commissioner $1aven, determine whether
the Planning Director's approval was appropriate, and if necessary, make any needed
modifications to the Conditions of Approval.
BACKGROUND
This project is the construction and operation of an automobile service station with a 648
square foot automated car wash, an 875 square foot convenience mart (without alcoholic
beverage sales) and a 1,645 square foot fast food restaurant with drive-through service on
0.794 acres located at the southwest corner of Margarita Road and Yukon, within the Palomar
Village Shopping Center. All uses are expected to operate seven (7) days per week. The
service station is proposed to operate on a 24-hour basis; the car wash operation shall be
limited to 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.; and the fast food restaurant will operate 6:00 a.m. to
10:00 p.m. This application was approved by the Planning Director on March 13, 1997.
This appeal was filed March 25, 1997 by Planning Commissioner Marcia Slaven (see
Attachment 1). Commissioner Slaven stated that she had a number of concerns with the
design of the project. Her major concerns included the 24-hour operation of the service station,
the off-site illumination of the canopy lighting, and the need for an adequate landscape buffer
on the north side of the project site.
ANALYSIS
North side landscql~ing and wall I~lans
During the Planning Director's hearing for Planning Application No. PA96-0345, the applicant's
representative agreed to add Condition #4.b. requiring a block wall on the north side of the
project. It is anticipated that the block wall will be constructed of decorative block, and located
on the interior, down side of the proposed berm. Additionally, the applicant agreed to cluster
R:~,-taffrptk.345pa~.ap~ 4/?J~7 cad
landscaping along the street side of the wall to discourage graffiti. The applicant's
representative is in the process of preparing the revised plans showing these changes. While
the revised plans were not available for distribution to the Commission at the time this staff
report was prepared, the representative will have them available to the Commission prior to or
at the Commission's April 7, 1997 hearing.
Project lighting
The approved project recluires the use of recessed lighting fixtures in the canopy to minimize
off-site illumination. The applicant's proposal for canopy lighting was reviewed by the City's
Chief Building Official Anthony J. Elmo, CBO. His comments are noted in a February 11, 1997
letter to the applicant, which is included as Attachment 2. Additionally, the applicant's
representative is preparing a supplemental lighting analysis in response to the appeal. The
analysis will be distributed to the Commissioners at the April 7, 1997 hearing.
Project's 24-ho-r A,,tomobile Rervice -~t-tion oDerAtion
The original project proposal listed the following hours of operation:
Gas station
Car wash
Fast food
24-hours per day
a.m. to 11 p.m.
a.m. to 10 p.m.
7 days per week
7 days per week
7 days per week
The City's Development Code discusses car washes in Section 17.08.050 (d), Special Use
Regulations and Standards, and hours of operation are specifically limited to 7:00 a.m. to 10
p.m. The applicant accepted these hours for the car wash. However, he did not wish to
decrease the hours of operation for the service station.
Summ~ry
The issues discussed herein were considered by staff during the processing of the applicant's
proposal. Much of the redesign of the project and the revised Conditions of Approval that were
ultimately approved by the Planning Director, are a direct result of these discussions.
Attachments:
Correspondence from Planning Commissioner Marcia Slaven dated March 25, 1997- Blue
Page 3
Correspondence from Chief Building Official Anthony J. Elmo, CBO dated February 11,
1997- Blue Page 4
Minutes of the March 13, 1997 Planning Director's Hearing - Blue Page 5
Staff Report and Conditions of Approval Revised March 13, 1997 - Blue Page 6
R:\sta~frpt~45pa96.ap~ 4/2/97 cad ~
ATTACHMENT NO. 6
LETTERS IN OPPOSITION
R:\STAFFRFI'E345PA96.CCl §13197 dwh 17
1409 Via Gabriel
Palos Verdes Estates,
CA 90274
April 4, 1997
Temecula Planning Commission
New City Hall
43200 Business Park Dr.
Temecula, CA 92590
SUBJECT: Proposed project at Yukon and Margarita
Gentlemen and/or Mesdames:
As the owner of the house at 30416 Danube Court,
Temecula, I wish to register my opposition to the installation
of a gas station, car wash and convenience store at the
corner of Yukon and Margarita.
It is my opinion that this project will adversely affect the
value of my property because of noise, increased traffic,
and the possibility of pollution of the Long Valley Wash.
Please do not approve this project.
Sincerely,
Sandra Forman
MEMO
To:
From:
Subject:
Date:
Debbie Ubnoske, Planning Manager
Carole Donahoe, Project Planner
Shell Station Appeal - Telephone Call in Opposition to the Project
April 7, 1997
Jeri and John Witt, 30321 Tradewater Court, Temecula (The Villages subdivision) called
because Mrs. Witt is ill and unable to attend the Planning Commission hearing this evening.
They want to voice opposition to the project, Planning Application No. PA96-0345. They have
requested that the following information be distributed to the Commission:
The project will be noisy. They are opposed to the car wash and Shell station. The KFC
would be okay.
The project will generate traffic and cause accidents. There are no lights on Yukon,
either at Margarita or at Rancho California Road.
3. The project will devalue surrounding residential property.
CC:
Dave Hogan, Senior Planner
Larry Cooley, Assistant Engineer
Larry Markham, representative
Markham & Associates
Via FAX No. 699-1848
I#onclay April 7, 1~? 2:12pa -- P.~e 11
The Avalon
Management Group
xUvVeflt xFerRevie~ Oeqeas~Co , v~t
2
04/O7/97
Ker~Jcky F~ed ChickarL ~ inc~Jde I i'~ Ihe ~ re: Planning ~ no. PA.q6-0345
(Devek3pmer~
jHondoy ApHt 7, 1997 2:121:m
To: ~ VJllalle ~
Dm~ wut.Km,~ JVe~/bit
42191 Rubidon Cm:le
Apfd 7, 1997
To 1he V'dlag¢ Boant of Directors, ~,a Plmming Commission:
Ploa~ allow me to set/he record sUaight..I am vd,-m,-~tly opposod to any seavice statioa
or rcstaumnts amassing dos~ to my locale. These im~ine~-% along with lhe Phuming
Commission, are inviting high speeds, vandalism, crimo and lraffio into a quiet, family-
orimlexl nci~hhodaood. Prolxaty values are at rislL as is this commtmi .ty and my quality of
We all know hhat growlh is an important part of any city, but not at the expens~ of
~ablished, quality ncighbo~s. Please undergrand I am not opposed ~o progress in
Temooula, but the comer of Yukon and Margarila is not a good localion fo~ these
b~incasca. Kcatucky Fried Chickca and Shell may feel that this is an ideal ioe. ariott for
making profi~ but they probably wouldn't live in a neighborhood studded wid~ fast food
restrotators and gas sialions. Would you?? Their profits will not b, r¢inv~lcd into our
nci~=hhodaoods willa trccs and oth~ improvcancnts, but ralhc'r into parking 1o1~ 85 wcll as
their poekeg.
Temecttla is a wonderful city in which, ~o live and raise f~ilies. Part oflhe city's
altractioa is its ability to foresee potential problems and ¢limin~ting ~ by ZODing giroilar
buslncsscs logcthcr. K. ggp these typ~s ofbusincsses out ofresidemi~l r~ighbod~nod.q! Let
ms not give liceage to Ihc highest bidder but rather to eat which will enhance 1he '~1~
oftho community and our city.
Sincerely,
Dan and Karen Nes, bit
MEMO
To:
From:
Subject:
Date:
Debbie Ubnoske, Planning Manager
Carole Donahoe, Project Planner
Shell Station Appeal - Telephone Call in Opposition to the Project
April 7, 1997
I received a call this morning from Ruby Doerksen, 30551 Hollyberry Lane, Temecula
(Village Grove subdivision) who is unable to attend the Planning Commission hearing this
evening, but wanted to voice her opposition to the project, Planning Application No. PA96-
0345. She has requested that I relay the following information to the Commission:
The project lacks a current traffic report. In light of the hazards existing at the
intersection of Margarita and Rancho California Roads, safety concerns should be
addressed. The increase in traffic caused by the buildout of the shopping center renders
the General Plan study obsolete.
The project will generate noise and fumes that will rise up and impact the surrounding
residences.
o
The project is not suitable down the street from an established community. The
masterplan for the shopping center did not show a gas station.
Temecula residents' voices should be heard.
CC:
Larry Markham, representative
Markham & Associates
Via FAX No. 699-1848
MEMO
To:
From:
Subject:
Date:
Debbie Ubnoske, Planning Manager
Carole Donahoe, Project Planner
Shell Station Appeal - Telephone Call in Opposition to the Project
April 7, 1997
Harold Doerksen, 30551 Hollyberry Lane, Temecula (Village Grove subdivision) has called
because he is unable to attend the Planning Commission hearing this evening, and wants to voice
his opposition to the project, Planning Application No. PA96-0345. He has requested that I
relay the following information m the Commission:
1. Temecula is over-saturated with car washes. We don't need another one.
2. The project doesn't add anything to the area.
The project should consider another pad at the shopping center that is adjacent to Rancho
California Road.
4. Yukon is a residential street and wasn't constructed for tankers and other commercial use.
CC:
Dave Hogan, Senior Planner
Larry Cooley, Assistant Engineer
Larry Markham, representative
Markham & Associates
Via FAX No. 699-1848
DON'T LET MARGARITA ROAD AND RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD
BECOME DEATH ALLEY
THREE SCHOOLS ARE ON MARGARITA THAT PULL STUDENTS FROM
ACROSS RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD. TEMECULA VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL,
MARGARITA MIDDLE SCHOOL AND THE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL AT MARGARITA
AND MORAGA. THEY WILL ALL BE PASSING THE DANGEROUS LEFT TURN
INTO YUCON JUST A SHORT BLOCK FROM RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD.
ENOUGH PEOPLE USE THIS TURN NOW, GOING INTO THE MARKET AND INTO
VILLAGE GROVE.
MORE PEOPLE TURNING IN AT ALL TIMES OF THE DAY AND NIGHT
FOR GAS WOULD INCREASE THE LIKELIHOOD OF ACCIDENTS GREATLY.
Remember your childhood! did YOU always look both ways
before you crossed the street? was there one time you saw
your friend across the street and ran across not carefully but
on the spur of the moment. All kids are vulnerable to this
moment.
THE PRIME QUESTION IS, CAN FAMILIES COPE WITH THE ODDS
OF THEIR CHILDREN BEING KILLED IN THAT UNEXPECTED MOMENT.
All the Neighbors of this Gas station are going to have
to learn to live with added noise, lights shining in the window
all night long. PEOPLE DO NOT KEEP THEIR STORES OPEN, IF BUSINESS
IS NOT BEING DONE. NONE OF THE PEOPLE IN VILLAGE will escape
the noise or the fear for their kids. WE HAVE ALREADY BEEN
THROUGH THE ACCIDENT AT THE HIGH SCHOOL CORNER THAT KILLED
SEVERAL STUDENTS AND THE OTHER YOUNG MAN ON A VISIT TO HIS
FATHERS HOME THAT WAS KILLED CROSSING THE STREET.
QUESTION! HOW MANY OF THESE GAS STATION MINI MARTS DO WE HAVE
ALREADY! do we need one on every corner. WITHIN TWO BLOCKS WE
HAVE A PROPOSED MINI MART, WITHIN TWO BLOCKS WE HAVE A CAR WASH
AND Gas STATION. will the competition put some out of business
and will we be left with a decaying neighborhood of empty stores.
WE HAVE SEEN THIS IN TEMECULA BEFORE .
We have just heard a number of Politicians talk about family
values. Where does this responsibility stop, at the door of
the child's house. OR, IS IT THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE VILLAGE,
AS THE FIRST LADY REMINDS US IN HER BOOK "IT TAKES A VILLAGE".
ENOUGH IS ENOUGH, DON'T KILL OUR NEIGHBORHOOD KIDS, OR OUR
MAR 13 1997 ,
January28,1997
Anita Chaplin
c/o Avalon Mgmt. Co.
31590 Railroad Canyon Rd.
Canyon Lk., CA 92587
Re: Proposed Gas Station Complex
After observing a sign on the comer of Yukon and Rancho California Roads which
indicated a proposed gas station, conveinance mart, fast food restaurants and car wash, I
called the City of Temecula Planning Department and spoke with Carol, who is the
Project Coordinator. She informed me the project was in a preliminary stage and was
actually proposed for the corner of Yukon and Margarita Road, (the sign was placed on
the wrong comer). She indicated to me the City was also concerned with the request to
have the complex open 24 hours as well as the placement of the car wash.
My concern is for the safety of my area subdivision with regard to health and hazardous
conditions produced by this business. It puts the Villages Homeowners Association and
the City of Temecula in a precarious position with regard to liability by allowing this
business to proceed and operate within such close proximity to homes.
I would appreciate a further evaluation of the proximity of the gas station complex to
existing homes in the subdivision. This being a mere twenty yards away can produce
excessive congestion, noise and a definite threat to our health.
Please reconsider allowing this type of business to operate in that small area. Surely a
restaurant or some other passive use can be maintained in that small space.
Respectfully,
Mrs. Audrey Madonia
30486 Danube Court
Temecula, California 92591