The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About092701 PTS Agenda.... hD' b'l ........... AGENDA TEMECULA PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION TO BE HELDAT CITY HALL COUNCIL CH3,MBERS 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, Cahfornla Thursday, September 27, 2001 ~at 6:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER: FLAG SALUTE ROLL CALL: PRESENTATIONS: COMMISSIONERS: Coe, Cz nnerton, Katan, Lanier, Edwards Temecula Police Department, Community Service Officer Lynn F mene Crime Prevention PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can add ;ess the Commission on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each If you desire to speak to the Commission about an item no__!t listed on the Agenda, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Commission Secretary. and state your name and address When you are called to speak, please come forward . For all other agenda items, a RequesttoSpeak formmustbefitedwiththeRecordingSecretarybeforethe Comwasston gets to that ttem. There ts a three (3) minute ttme lumt for md~vMual speakers. NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be ro There will be no discussion of these items unless members &the l specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate COMMISSION CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Minutes of May 24~ 2001 RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the Minutes of May 24, 2001. ~tine and all will be enacted by one vote. ublic/Traffic Safety Commission request action. 1 2 S dL' 't V II ' A dj dd' hS 'thR d COMMISSION BUSINESS pee ~m~ - a cio venue an e e la mt os RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission recqmmend that the City Council adopt an ordinance establishing a 35 MPH speed limit on Vallejo Avenue and Jedediah Sm/th Road. I P tA ' LED FI h' L' h n- avemen mDer as lng lg Is or Lrosswalks RECOMMENDATION: 5. 6. 7. Commission Reports ADJOURNMENT The next regular meeting of the City of Temecula Public/Traffic Sa October 25, 2001, at 6:00 P.M., Temecula City Hall, Council Temecula, Califomia. 3.1 That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission receive direction to staff. Traffic Engineer's Report Police Chief's Report Fire Chief's Report the status report and provide further rety Commission will be held on Thursday, Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, 2 ITEM NO. 1 MINUTES OF A REGUL ~,R MEETING OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION MAY 24, 2001 CALL TO ORDER The City of Temecula Public/Traffic Safety Commission at 6:03 P.M., on Thursday, May 24, 2001, in the City Cc convened in a regular meeting uncil Chambers of Temecula City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. FLAG SALUTE The audience was led in the Flag salute by Commissioner Katan. ROLL CALL C Present: ommissioners Cge, Connerton, Katan, Lanier, and Chairwoman Edwards. Absent: None. Also Present: Director of Public VVorks Hughes, Deputy Director of Public Works Parks, Senior Engineer MOghadam, Associate Engineer Gonzalez, Pohce Offmer Nelson, Adm~n~strabve Secretary Pyle, and Minute Clerk Hansen. PRESENTATIONS Website Presentation - Public Transportation Options in Temecula Noting that the Emergency Transportation Circulation Plan (ETCP) included the recommendation for providing transportation options information for the community via the City's website, Web Analyst Comerchero provided a detailed overview of the data available inclus ve of Park and Ride locations, real-time road information, maps, road conditions, and carpooling and vanpooling information. Commending Web Analyst Comerchero, CommissionerlConnerton, echoed by Chairwoman Edwards, relayed that the data provided thp community was comprehensive, Councilman Pratt offering applause for Web Analyst Comerchero's diligent effods with respect to providing this information to the public on the City's website. For Chairwoman Edwards, and in response to Mr. Dool s phone call received by C ty staff earher in the day, Web Analyst Comerchero c arifie~l that information regarding the Stage Stop, and the Temecula Shuttle was provided on the website. R:ltrafficminutes\052401 1 Emerqency Serv ces Team Presentation - Community Action Patrol (CAP) Ser eant M~tchell w~th 'h ........ I ~ g ' ' [ e r~iversioe uoun[y Sheriff s uepadment Emergency ~ervices Team apprised the Commission with respect to the development of the Community Action Patrol (CAP) Program which is a citizens' patrol program, noting that the program was n the plann ng and preparabon phase, rel,ay~ng hopes to beg~n tran ng the recruits (citizens 18 years of age, and older, with a valid driver's license) in late July or August; provided an overview of the citizen patrol units'lduties inclusive of vacation house checks, traffic control assistance, special events assistance, disabled person checks, park checks, and random patrol for safety and hazard spots in the City; and advised that this unit would be operating under his supervision. Providing additional information regarding the program, Senior Deputy Quinata relayed the uniform concepts, the vehicles that would be utilized, and the timeline for the program. / For Commissioner Connedon, Sergeant Mitchell noted that the training would most likely take place over s~x weekends w~th an add~bonal 40 hours of training from the Sheriffs Depadment n response to Commissioner Lamer, relay,ed that staff wou d be investigating expanding the responsibilities and duties (i.e., citing for handicapped violations) after the program's onset; for Chairwoman Edwards, concurred that most likely a few of the current senior volunteers would enrolllin the program; and relayed hopes of the program being in operation in September. PUBLIC COMMENTS Mr. Sam Pratt, 40470 Brixton Cove, read into the record a letter he had written outlining the need for public transportation, and recommending tt~at all major arterial and freeway construction be stopped and that those funds be directed towards a 5-year plan to complete a convenient, affordable, local high-speed ~ntrastate pubhc/pnvate transportation system. COMMISSION CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the Minutes of March 22, 2001. Approve the Minutes of Apdl 26, 2001. 1.2 MOTION: The motion was seconded by Commissioner Coe and v(~ice vote approval. Commissioner Connerton moved to approve Consent Calendar Item No. 1. reflected unanimous R:~b"afficminut e s~052401 2 COMMISSION BUSINESS 2. Harveston Community Mobility Enhancement Plan (CMEP) RECOMMENDATION: , 2.1 That the Public/Traffic Safety CommissiOn receive and file a report on the Harveston Community Mobility Enhancement Plan (CMEP). Mr. Ray Becker, representing Lennar Communities (theI Harveston Project), briefed the Commission regarding the collaborative efforts of City staff, Councilmembers, the Riverside Transit Agency (RTA), and the project representatives to incorporate transportation elements as part of the Harveston proposal; and relayed the plan to provide the City a 3-year lease for two shuttle vehicles, ~oting the incorporation of this commitment in the Development Agreement. I Via a PowerPoint presentation, Mr. Matthew Fagan, replresenting Lennar Communities provided introductory comments regarding the Commudity Mobility Enhancement Plan (CMEP); presented the Harveston Development Plan, highlighting the location, the land use plan, the neighborhood mini-parks, the landscaped loop road with a meander ng s dewalk and b~ke lanes the open-ended cu -de-sacs, tl~e elementary schools, the ten- foot multi-use trail around the lake, the Village Center with transit provisions, the roundabout element which would be used for traffic calr~ing, the amphitheater, the Paseo Park which connects the Lake and the Lake Park to the Community Park (a 16.5~ acre lighted park), the landscaped arterial roads, the Arioyo Park (a 13.8-acre natural park), the entry monumentations, and the numerous bike trails; for Chairwoman Edwards, relayed that any easement 66 feet in width, or~ greater, would be City- maintained via the TCSD; per agenda material outlined, n detail, the Community Mobility Enhancement Plan (CMEP), noting the goals ofithe plan, the potential shuttle loops, the public transit plan which has been endorsed by the Riverside Transit Agency, the marketing issues associated with the transit opportunities, the establishment of a Lifestyle Maintenance Organization (LMO) which is a vblunteer program that schedules chaperones for walking children to and from school; noted Mayor Comerchero's suggestion to implement a walking bus; relayed the proposed trads system, the internet program, the potential uses within the Village Center which would aid in reducing trips outside of the project, and the public education plan designed to inform residents of the benefits associated with pedestrian travel and utilization of the shuttle system. Mr. Sam Pratt, 40740 Brixton Cove, encouraged resider ts to attend the Public/Traffic Safety Commission meetings; commended the Lennar r~.~presentatives for their efforts regarding addressing traffic impacts in the City via offeri ~g alternative transit options. It was the consensus of the Public/Traffic Safety Commi~.sion that this padicular proposal was a wonderful project, and one that would enhance traffic circulation. For Commissioner Coe, Mr. Becker noted that Lennar's Icommitment to the shuttle program was a unique feature, relaying Councilman Pratt's efforts regarding the implementation of this element. The Public/Traffic Safety Commission received and filed Ithis report. R:\trafficminutes\052401 3 Proposed Capital mprovement Pro.qram - Fiscal Years 2002-2006 RECOMMENDATION: I / 3.1 That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission r~view and discuss the proposed circulation projects in the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for Fiscal Years 2002-2006. By way of overheads, Director of Public Works Hughes iprovided an overview of the proposed Capital Improvement Program (CIP) FY 2002i2006, outlining the circulation projects in the following manner: 1) the projects which were completed (or would be completed during the fiscal year 2000-2001), 2) the projects that are currently under construction, 3) the projects that are in the design and ~lanning stage that have identified funding, and 4) the projects that are being studied and designed in advance, which do not have funding at this time. For Chairwoman Edwards, Director of Public Works Hu~hes relayed the plan for Business Park Drive to connect to the new re-aligned Diaz Road which would address, in part, the concerns of the business owners in this part!cular business park, advising that left turns in and out of that location would be prohibited; and enumerated the s gn f cant benef ts th s project would prowde ~nclus~ve of the elimination of a non- signalized intersection, the elimination of the signal at Diaz Road, and additional stacking distance between the new intersection and OIc~ Town Front Street. In response to Commissioner Connerton's queries regarding the Harveston Project, Director of Public Works Hughes noted the two years that staff has been working with Lennar Communities to ensure that traffic flow ~n that area could be accommodated adequately, advising that the proposal that will be goinglforward at this time will be that Lennar Communities will be providing significant off-sit~' improvements at various intersections, and additionally through the Development Agreement, will be required to provide approximately 10 acres of commercial property Io facd~tate construction of the new interchange; specified that the interchange project was divided into approximately eight phases due to the total costs of over $70 million, noting the alternate potential funding sources for this particular project; confirmed that the interchange project would relieve the congestion of the Winchester Road (southbound) offramp; and relayed that the project study report was still in the development pha~se. / Regarding the John Warner Road/Santiago Road Asseslsment District Improvement Project, for Commissioner Connerton, Director of PubliclWorks Hughes noted that this project was in the initial steps, relaying that various proRerty owners have submitted a preliminary survey of support for the improvements in this area; advised that the City's proposal was to study the entire area this year, to develop a plan, and subsequently to seek approval for an Assessment District; clarified that if these plans include connecting Santiago Road to Margarita Road, the City would have to contribute funds, which at this time had not been identified. In response, Commissione~' Connerton noted that since at some point in time the connection would be constructedL it would be his recommendation that there be consideration to construct the project initiaily (during construction of the alternate improvements to this area) as a two-lane road lwhich could be improved at a future point in time. Director of Public Works Hughes noted that at this time staff was working to address the property owners' desires, advisi~ ~g that his recommendation would be considered during the planning of this project. With respect to the Margarita Road Interim Improvemeqts from Plo Pico Road to Pauba Road, for Commissioner Connerton, Senior Engineer Moghadam noted that the vo ume of trips in this area was currently approximately 20,000.1In response, Commissioner Connerton queried whether this project should be elevated to a Priority I Project. For Commissioner Connerton, Director of Public Works Hughes noted at this time efforts were being made to reduce the above-mentioned proje, :t plan to solely constitute placing pavement in this section, and providing four lanes of tra eel, but not necessarily full improvements, which would reduce the right-of-way acc uisition necessary, as well as the construction costs; and advised that there is a possibilit that the project would be fast- tracked. Commissioner Connerton opined that this was a much-needed project. For Commissioner Connerton, Director of Public Works Hughes confirmed that the Meadowview North City Circulation Study was programmed for three years from this time, advising that there was no funding identified for this project at this time; and noted the benefits to waiting for a future point to conduct this ~tudy, advising that the County is in the process of completing its Land Use Planning at t~is time, as well as updating the Circulation Element, additionally noting that the City would be updating its General Plan. For clarification, and in response to Commissioner Con~erton, Director of Public Works Hughes relayed that the proposed Pauba Road Improvements (denoted on page 88 of the proposed CIP per the agenda material) would be west of Margarita Road. Commissioner Connerton recommended that Phase II '~nd Ill be completed at the same time. Director of Public Works Hughes relayed that bothI projects would most likely be funded within the same year, noting that while it was possible for the projects to be completed at the same time, the improvements proximate to the library site would be the highest priority. ~- With respect to the Rancho California Road Widening P oject (at Ynez Road, and east of Ynez Road), for Commissioner Connerton, Director of Piublic Works Hughes noted that these projects (denoted on page 100 and 102 of the proposed CIP) would not be constructed at the same time. Senior Engineer Moghadam advised, for CommissionerlConnerton, that at an upcoming Public/Traffic Safety Commission meeting, the Commission would receive a report regarding Red Light Photo Enforcement. With respect to the Ynez Road Median Project (denoted/ on page 124 of the proposed CIP), Director of Public Works Hughes clarified that this project was represented in the CIP in order to set up funding to complete various medi~in installations which have been initially half-constructed by development projects, conditioned to do so. For Commissioner Connerton, Director of Public Works Hughes noted that the Ynez Road Widening Project (from Rancho Vista Road to La I~az Street, and from Tierra Vista Road to Rancho Vista Road) (denoted on pages 126 and 128 of the proposed CIP) are planned to be constructed in future years, advising that ~ specific year for construction has not been programmed at this time. Offering clarification for Commissioner Katan, Director o[ Public Works Hughes relayed that the pedestrian crossing at Winchester Road was not included in the CIP, advising R:~rafficminutes1052401 5 that staff has been requested to investigate the feasibility and potential costs of th s p oject, not ng that subsequently the C~ty Counc~ w~ll consider whether, or not, to comm t funds for this project; with respect to the Winchester Ro~d/Nicolas Road intersection, provided additional information regarding the d~scuss~ons w~th the School District officials, Caltrans representatives, and the Police Department; and noted the modifications completed at this intersection due to the meetings and analys s conducted. Additional discussion ensued regarding constructing a ~edestrian ramp which would be ADA accessible. Director of Public Works Hughes added that it was difficult to encourage individuals to utilize a pedestrian ramp, noting that oftentimes pedestrians will not inconvenience themselves to utilize a pedestrian ramp. Providing additional information regarding the tragic accident that occurred proximate to the school, Director of Public Works Hughes noted that ~taff dealt with the probabilities of accidents everyday via analysis, and ultimately at every intersection in the City c ar fy ng that in this City, and every other one, there would be accidents, injuries, and fatalities, and that no amount of money could prevent all accidents at every location. / For Commissioner Coe, Director of Public Works Hugh~s confirmed that the signal at Pala Road/Wolf Valley Road, scheduled to be installed in the year 2003-2004 was correlated with the widening project for Pala Road, providing additional information regarding the possibility of installing temporary signals a~t a sooner point for an interim improvement of traffic flow. ~ In response to Commissioner Coe, Director of Public W~rks Hughes relayed that staff has had several meetings with the City of Murrieta with iespect to the Date Street~Cherry Street Interchange Concept, advising that various options are being discussed. / With regard to the Rainbow Canyon Clubhouse Drive Sidewalk Project (denoted on page 168 of the proposed CIP), for Commissioner Coe, Director of Public Works Hughes noted that the project was dependent on receipt of a gra~t (additionally noting that the City would match the grant funds for this project), relaying that if the grant application was successful, construction could begin at the end of this year, or the beginning of next. For Commissioner Connerton, Director of Public Works Hughes noted that pavement maintenance would be occurring over the next several months on Rancho California Road. In response to Chairwoman Edwards, Director of Public ,Works Hughes advised that it was a favorable situation in the City of Temecula where transportation projects were placed as high priority items, advising that approximately, $90 million in projects would be funded over the next five years. TRAFFIC ENGINEER'S REPORT A. Director of Public Works Hughes noted that the .'~ia Montezuma Crossing would be opening soon, relaying that the last course of pavement had been installed earlier today (i.e., May 241h.) B. Updating the Public/Traffic Safety Commission with respect to the action the Commission took regarding setting speed limits in the Temeku Hills area, R:\t r a ffi ccnin ut es\052401 6 Director of Public Works Hughes relayed that th City Council has postponed the matter (due to new information submitted from Dr. Wedel, an area resident), and would be considering the item on June 26, 20011 and provided additional information with respect to setting speed limits. POLICE CHIEF'S REPORT No comments. FIRE CHIEF'S REPORT No comments. COMMISSION REPORTS A. In response to Commissioner Katan's noted concern regarding the area of Rancho California Road within the County limits,IChairwoman Edwards, Director of Public Works Hughes, as well as Senior Engineer Moghadam provided information regarding the left-turn lanes which w~uld be installed at nearly all the major driveways and intersections in this section of town. Referencing his travels in other communities, Commissioner Connerton noted how fortunate the City of Temecula was with respect to the lack of serious negative traffic flow impacts, commending the efforts of staff and all entit es involved with proactively addressing traffic impacts in the City. Noting that he had the opportunity to view how th,e Fire Department's GPS network operated, Commissioner Lanier relayed that the system was phenomenal. Advising that a friend had informed him regardin a surveyor's gun which gathers important data after major accidents, Commissioner Lanier noted that he had called Police Chief Domenoe to forward the data ~only to discover the City of TemecuJa was currently utilizing this device, commending the City for the innovative tools the Police Department utilizes. Referencing the Sunday newspaper, The Californian, Chairwoman Edwards noted that she would be contributing to a column ~very two weeks, noting that this first article's topic was regarding the 25 MPH speed limit, when children are present. For informational purposes, Chairwoman Edward Rush Limbaugh radio show addressed Red Light advising that she had the opportunity to discuss ti approximately ten minutes. relayed that the May 23rd Camera Photo Enforcement, ~e issue "on air" for R:ltrafficminules~052401 7 ADJOURNMENT At 8:20 P.M. Chairwoman Edwards formally adjourned his meeting to Thursday, June 28, 2001 at 6:00 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula. Chairwoman Maryann Edwards Administrative Secretary Anita Pyle ITEM NO 2 AGENDA REPO T TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Public/Traffic Safety Commission ~'~kli Moghadam, P.E., Senior Engineer, Tr!ffic September 27, 2001 Item 2 Speed Limit - Vallejo Avenue and Jeded RECOMMENDATION: That the Public/Traffic Safety comnUssion recommend that the Cit~ 35 MPH speed limit on Vallejo Avenue and Jedediah Smith Road' BACKGROUND: ah Smith Road Council adopt an ordinance establishing a In August 2001 a request was received from Mr. Larry Markham, president of Los Ranchitos Homeowners Association, to initiate a speed survey along Vallejo Avenue to establish a speed limit. The public has been not fled of the Publ c/Traffic Safety Commission s conslderatmn ofth~s matter through the agenda notification process. Vallejo Avenue is a 32-foot wide local roadway with one travel lalne in each direction. The average daily traffic (ADT) volume on Vallejo Avenue (West) between Ynez Ro~d and La Paz Road is approximately 492. Vallejo Avenue (East) between La Paz Road and Ynez Road carries approximately 168 ADT. An Engineering and Traffic Survey was performed that included a [survey of vehicle speeds, a review of the accident history and roadway conditions not readily appar, ent to d~ivers. The table below summarizes the Engineering and Traffic Survey data shown on Exhibit "C . / Roadway Segment Vallejo Avenue: Santiago Road to Ynez Road Ynez Road to La Paz Road La Paz Road to Ynez Road Ynez Road to Cabrillo Avenue No. of Accidents 0 43 1 44 0 39 0 39 85th Percentile Speed MP] Posted Recommended Speed Speed Limit MPH MPH None 35 None 35 None 35 None 35 :\t ra fficXcommissn\agenda\2{301 \0927Vallej o Speed Limi~/ajp Although the results of the Engineering and Traffic Survey sugg est that a 40 MPH speed limit could be supported on Vallejo Avenue between Santiago Road and La Paz Road, Staff recommends establishing a 35 MPH speed hmlt because of the roadway s narrow w~dth and lack of s~dewalk, horizontal ahgnment, and the adjacent residential land uses. In addition to Vallejo Avenue, staffperformed an Engineering and Traffic Survey on Jedediah Smith Road between State Route 79 (South) and De Portola Road/Ynez Road. ~rhis section of Jedediah Smith Road was not included in the Citywide Engineering and Traffic Survey perfo ~rrned~ in 2000 because State Route 79 was under construction at the time. The table below summarizes the Engineering and Traffic Survey data shown on Exhibit "C". Roadway Segment Accidents Jedediah Smith Road: State Route 79 to De Portola Road/Ynez Road No. of 85th Percentile Speed MPH 0 38 Posted Recommended Speed Speed Limit MPH MPH None 35 Based on the results of the Engineering and Traffic Survey, Staffr~commends establishing a 35 MPH speed limit on Jedediah Smith Road between State Route 79 (South) and De Portola Road/Ynez Road. FISCAL IMPACT: Funds are available for signing and pavement markings in the Public Works Routine Street Maintenance Account. Attachment.: 1. Exhibit "A" -Location Map / 2. Exhibit "B" - Letter from Los Ranchitos Homeowners Association, 3. Exhibit "C" - Vehicular Volume and Speed Data dated August 3,2001 [traffic\conunissnXagenda\2001\0927Vallejo Speed Lin~it/ajp EXHIBIT "A" LOCATION MAP EXHIBIT "B" LETTER FROM LOS RAI HOMEOWNERS ASSO¢ DATED AUGUST 3, qCHITOS ~IATION ~001 August 3, 2001 ;~0 ' d Oty of Temecula - Public Works Jerry Conzalez, Associate Engineer 43200 Business Park Drive P.O. Box 9033 Los Ranchitos Temecula, CA 92593-9033 Subject: Request for SI Vallejo Ave. Dear Jerry, ~eed Limits .eed Survey r~ham Los Ranchitos HOA 9Z9£96~606 Thanks for the exhibit denoting speeds for ti e streets in Los Ranchitos. Pursuant to our discussion of 7-31-01, pleas~ initiate a survey for Vallejo Ave. I also believe that it is important to include a Sunday survey due to the church traffic. Thanks in advance. EXHIBIT "C" VEHICULAR VOLUME AND ;PEED DATA Location: Vallejo s/o La Paz Temecula Volumes f!r Wed. 08/22/01 08690002 AM Period NB 12:00-12:15 0 12:15-12:30 0 12:30-12:45 0 12:45-1:00 1 1:00-1:15 0 1:15-1:30 0 0 0 0 0 1:30-1:45 0 1:45-2:00 0 2:00-2:15 0 2:15-2:30 0 2:30-2:45 0 2:45-3:00 0 0 0 1 0 PM Period I NB SB 12:00-12:15 0 0 12:15-12:30 3 1 12:30-12:4 4 1 12:45-1:00 i 8 1 SB 0 1:00-1:15 0 1:15-1:30 0 1:30-1:45 0 0 0 1:45-2:00 0 2:00-2:15 0 2:15-2:30 0 2:30-2:45 0 0 0 2:45-3:00 0 2 0 0 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 0 1 1 4 0 3 5 11 7 3:00-3:15 0 3:15-3:30 0 3:30-3:45 0 3:45-4:00 0 4:00-4:15 0 4:15-4:30 0 4:30-4:45 0 4:45-5:00 0 5:00-5:15 1 5:15-5:30 0 5:30-5:45 0 5:45-6:00 2 3 0 3:00-3:I5 0 3:15-3:30 0 3:30-3:45 0 0 0 3:45-4:00 0 4:00-4:15 0 4:15-4:30 0 4:30-4:45 0 0 0 4:45-5:00 0 5:00-5:15 0 5:15-5:30 0 5:30-5:45 2 2 5 5:45-6:00 0 1 0 3 3 1 4 7 2 0 3 1 2 7 1 3 11 1 2 3 2 0 2 5 7 2 7 14 7 18 10 17 6:00-6:15 0 6:15-6:30 0 6:30-6:45 0 6:45-7:00 0 7:00-7:15 1 7:15-7:30 0 7:30-7:45 1 7:45-8:00 2 8:00-8:15 2 8:15-8:30 4 8:30-8:45 1 8:45-9:00 2 9:00-9:15 1 9:15-9:30 3 9:30-9:45 1 9:45-10:00 1 0 0 6:00-6:15 0 6:15-6:30 0 6:30-6:45 0 0 0 6:45-7:00 0 7:00-7:15 2 7:15-7:30 0 7:30-7:45 0 2 6 7:45-8:00 0 8:00-8:15 1 8:15-8:30 2 8:30~8:45 2 5 14 8:45-9:00 6 0 9:00-9:15 0 9:15-9:30 1 9:30-9:45 0 1 7 9:45-10:00 0 0 3 1 2 0 4 9 2 3 12 4 3 1 1 2 0 3 10 1 5 15 0 0 3 1 0 0 1 4 0 1 5 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 3 2 3 6 10:00-10:15 0 0 10:00-10:15 10:15-10:30 0 1 10:15-10:30 10:30-10:45 1 3 10:30-10:45 10:45-11:00 1 2 3 7 9 10:45-11:00 I 2 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 3 11:00-II:15 0 0 11:00-11:15 11:15-11:30 1 0 11:15-11:30 11:30-11:45 2 2 11:30-11:45 11:45-12:00 1 4 2 4 8 11:45-12:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 Total Vol Daily Totals 29 21 50 67 51 118 96 72 ~i~ Location: Valleio n/o La Paz Temecula Volumes fo! Wed. 08/22/0I 08690001 AM Period NB SB 12:00-12:15 0 1 12:15-12:30 0 1 12:30-12:45 0 2 12:45-1:00 1 1 1 PM Period[ NB 12:00-12:15 12:15-12:3~ 12:30-12:45 SB 6 6 8 5 8 4 2 24 5 5 6 12:45-1:00 20 44 1:00-1:15 0 0 1:00-1:15 2 4 1:15-1:30 0 2 1:15-1:30 2 6 1:30-1:45 0 0 1:30-1:45 2 2 1:45-2:00 0 0 1 3 3 1:45-2:00 3 9 3 15 24 2:00-2:15 0 0 2:00-2:15 5 4 2:15-2:30 2 0 2:15-2:30 1 4 2:30-2:45 0 0 2:30-2:45 3 4 2:45-3:00 2 4 2 2 6 2:45-3:00 3 12 2 14 26 3:00-3:15 1 0 3:00-3:15 4 4 3:15-3:30 0 0 3:15-3:30 1 1 3:30-3:45 0 0 3:30-3:45 6 4 3:45-4:00 0 1 0 0 1 3:45-4:00 5 16 4 13 29 4:00-4:15 0 0 4:00-4:15 3 3 4:15-4:30 0 0 4:15-4:30 9 4 4:30-4:45 0 0 4:30-4:45 6 6 4:45-5:00 0 0 0 0 0 4:45-5:00 5 23 9 22 45 5:00-5:15 0 0 5:00-5:15 5:15-5:30 0 3 5:15-5:30 5:30-5:45 1 0 5:30-5:45 5:45-6:00 1 2 0 3 5 5:45-6:00 6:00-6:15 0 0 6:00-6:15 6:15-6:30 0 0 6:15-6:30 6:30-6:45 1 2 6:30-6:45 6:45-7:00 1 2 1 3 5 6:45-7:00 7:00-7:15 1 1 7:00-7:15 7:15-7:30 0 4 7:15-7:30 7:30-7:45 2 2 7:30-7:45 7:45-8:00 3 6 4 11 17 7:45-8:00 8:00-8:15 5 1 8:00-8:15 8:15-8:30 2 7 8:15-8:30 8:30-8:45 5 5 8:30-8:45 8:45-9:00 3 15 7 20 35 8:45-9:00 9:00-9:15 5 13 9:00-9:15 9:15-9:30 3 15 9:15-9:30 9:30-9:45 7 3 9:30-9:45 9:45-10:00 2 17 1 32 49 9:45-10:00 10:00-10:15 4 4 10:00-10:15[ 10:15-10:30 1 3 10:15-10:30 10:30-10:45 2 4 10:30-10:45 10:45-11:00 3 10 2 13 23 10:45-11:00[ 5 7 6 4 8 4 3 22 5 20 6 6 0 1 3 3 2 11 4 14 8 10 2 12 3 7 3 16 1 30 2 1 1 1 0 5 3 6 0 7 1 1 3 1 7 1 3 14 0 3 0 1 2 1 0 2 0 2 0 4 42 25 46 13 17 6 11:00-11:15 3 1 11:00-11:15[ 11:15-11:30 0 4 11:15-11:30[ 11:30-11:45 5 3 11:30-1i:45 11:45-12:00 3 i1 2 10 21 11:45-12:00 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 Tot~Vol 69 102 171 D~ly Tot~s 156 225 165 267 321 SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed AnalysiD Ver. 2.00A/McTR3INS TEMECULA: VALLEJO DIRECTION(S) ....... E/W DATE ............... 8/22/2001 TIME ............... 8:00 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.40 MPH CUM MPH NO. PCT. PCT. < 5 0 0.0 0.0 5 0 0.0 0.0 6 0 0.0 0.0 7 0 0.0 0.0 8 0 0.0 0.0 9 0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0 0 0.0 15 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 00 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 0 0 19 0 0 0 00 20 1 33 33 2~ 0 0 0 33 22 0 0 0 3.3 23 0 0 0 3.3 24 0 0.0 3.3 25 0 0.0 3.3 26 0 0.0 3.3 27 0 0.0 3.3 28 0 0.0 3.3 29 0 0.0 3.3 30 2 6.7 10.0 31 3 10.0 20.0 32 2 6.7 26.7 33 1 3.3 30.0 34 1 3 3 33.3 35 1 3 3 36.7 36 3 10 0 46 7 37 3 10 0 56 7 38 2 6 7 63 3 39 1 3 3 66 7 40 2 6 7 73 3 41 2 6 7 80 0 42 1 3 3 83 3 43 1 3.3 86 7 44 2 6.7 93 3 45 1 3.3 96 7 46 1 3.3 100 0 47 0 0.0 100 . 0 48 0 0.0 100.0 49 0 0.0 100.0 50 0 0.0 100.0 >50 0 0.0 100.0 100 90 80 70 60 (NORTH) W/O CABRILLO 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED ................. 37 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED .43 10 MPH ~ACE SPEED .......... 30 through 39 PERCENTIIN PACE SPEED .............. 63.3 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED ............ 33.3 PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED ........... 3.3 RANGE 07 SPEEDS ................. 20 to 46 VEHICLES OBSERVED ..................... 30 AVERAGE SPEED ....................... 36.6 50 40 30 20 10 15 10 5 CUMULATIVE + .... + .... + .... +. + .... + .... + .... +- 10 20 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---+ .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + *****100 90 * 80 7O 6O 5O 4O * 30 * 20 * 10 0 -+ .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + 20 30 40 50 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + 15 10 5 I - --+ .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + 30 40 50 SPEEDPLOT 2 TEMECULA: DIRECTION(S) ....... N/S DATE ............... 8/23/2001 TIME ............... 8:00 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.40 MPH CUM MPM NO. PCT. PCT. <10 0 0.0 0 0 10 0 0.0 0 0 11 0 0.0 0 0 12 0 0.0 0 0 13 0 0.0 0 0 14 0 0.0 0 0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0 0 0.0 24 0 0 0 0.0 25 1 3 4 3.4 26 0 0 0 3.4 27 0 0 0 3.4 28 0 0 0 3.4 29 0 0.0 3.4 30 1 3.4 6.9 31 2 6.9 13.8 32 2 6.9 20.7 33 1 3 .4 24.1 34 2 6.9 31.0 35 1 3 .4 34 .5 36 1 3.4 37.9 37 1 3 4 41.4 38 1 3 4 44.8 39 2 6 9 51.7 40 2 6 9 58.6 41 2 6 9 65.5 42 2 6 9 72.4 43 3 10.3 82.8 44 1 3.4 86.2 45 1 3.4 89.7 46 0 0.0 89.7 47 t 3.4 93.1 48 0 0.0 93 .1 49 1 3.4 96.6 50 0 0.0 96.6 51 0 0.0 96.6 52 0 0.0 96.6 53 0 0.0 96.6 54 1 3.4 100.0 55 0 0.0 100.0 >55 0 0.0 100.0 Spot Speed Analysi VALLEJO N~O LA PAZ 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED ....... 39 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED ................. 44 10 MPN ~ACE SPEED ........ 34 through 43 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 58.6 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED ............ 17.2 PERCENT ~NDER PACE SPEED ........... 24.1 RANGE OFI SPEEDS ................. 25 to 54 VEHICLESI OBSERVED ..................... 29 AVERAGE SPEED ....................... 38.6 CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) 100 + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... **100+ 9o I 8O 50 40 30 20 10 + .... + .... + .... +_. 10 20 ** 90 80 * 70 60 50 40 3O 2O 10 0 --+ .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + 30 40 50 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) 15 + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + 15 10 + .... + .... + .... +_ - 10 20 5 II I- --+ .... + .... + .... + .... + .... 30 40 50 TEMECULA: VALLEJO SIO I2k PAZ DIRECTION(S) ....... N/S 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED ................. 29 DATE ............... 8/22/2001 TIME ............... 1:00 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.40 MPH CUM MPH NO. PCT. PCT. 0 0 0.0 0.0 1 0 0.0 0.0 2 0 0 0 0.0 3 0 00 0 0 4 0 0 0 00 5 0 0 0 00 6 0 0 0 00 7 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 00 9 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0 0 0 0 19 0 00 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 21 0 00 00 22 1 50 50 23 2 10 0 15 0 24 1 5 0 20 0 25 2 10.0 30.0 26 1 5.0 35.0 · 27 2 10.0 45.0 28 1 5.0 50.0 29 3 15.0 65.0 30 2 10.0 75.0 31 0 0.0 75.0 32 0 0.0 75.0 33 0 0 0 75 0 34 0 0 0 75 0 35 0 0 0 75 0 36 1 5 0 80 0 37 0 0 0 80 0 38 1 5 0 85 0 39 1 5 0 90 0 40 1 5.0 95 0 41 0 0.0 95.0 42 0 0.0 95.0 43 0 0.0 95.0 44 0 0.0 95.0 45 1 S. 0 100.0 46 0 0.0 100.0 >46 0 0.0 100.0 100 90 8O 7O 60 50 40 30 20 10 CUMULATIVE + .... + .... + .... +- 0 10 PERCENT + .... + .... + .... +_ . 15 10 5 + .... + .... + .... +__ 0 10 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED ................. 39 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 21 through 30 PERCENT lIN PACE SPEED .............. 75.0 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED ............ 25.0 PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED ........... 0.0 RANGE 04 SPEEDS ................. 22 to 45 VEHICLES OBSERVED ..................... 20 AVEP~AGE SPEED ....................... 29.8 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) -__+ .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + 9O 8O 7O 60 5O 40 30 2O 10 .__+ .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + 20 30 40 VS. SPEED (MPH) --+ .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + 15 10 --+ .... + .... + .... + .... + .... 20 30 40 SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysi~ Ver. 2.00A/McTPJLNS TEMECULA: VALLEJO DIRECTION(S) ....... E/W DATE ............... 8/22/2001 TIME ............... 1:00 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.40 MPH CUM MPH NO. PCT. PCT. < 5 0 0.0 0.0 5 0 0.0 0.0 6 0 0.0 0.0 7 0 0.0 0.0 8 0 0.0 0.0 9 0 0 0 0.0 10 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 00 12 0 0 0 00 13 0 0 0 00 14 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 0 0 00 18 0 00 0 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 0.0 0 0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 0 0.0 0.0 29 0 0.0 0.0 30 2 10.0 10.0 31 2 10.0 20.0 32 1 5 0 25 0 33 2 10 0 35 0 34 2 10 0 45 0 35 2 10 0 55 0 36 3 15 0 70 0 37 1 5 0 75 0 38 2 10 0 85 0 39 1 5 0 90 0 40 0 0 0 90 0 41 1 5.0 95 0 42 0 0.0 95 0 43 0 0.0 95.0 44 0 0.0 95.0 45 0 0.0 95.0 46 0 0.0 95.0 47 1 5.0 100.0 48 0 0.0 100.0 49 0 0.0 100.0 50 0 0.0 100.0 >50 0 0.0 100.0 CUMULAT I VE + .... + .... + .... +- 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 + .... + .... + .... +- 10 20 (SOUTH) W/O CABRILLO 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED ................. 35 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED ................. 39 10 MPH ~ACE SPEED .......... 30 through 39 PERCENT lIN PACE SPEED .............. 90.0 PERCENT lOVER PACE SPEED ............ 10.0 PERCENT IUNDER PACE SPEED ........... 0.0 PJLNGE O~ SPEEDS ................. 30 to 47 VEHICLES OBSERVED ..................... 20 AVERAGE SPEED ....................... 35.3 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---+ .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + ****100 ** 90 80 * 70 6O 5O 40 3O 2O 10 0 - -+ .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + PERCEN' + .... + .... + .... +- 15 5 + .... + .... + .... +_. 10 20 10 30 40 50 VS. SPEED (MPH) .-_+ .... + .... + .... + .... + .... 15 10 --+ .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + 30 40 50 SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot TEMECULA: DIRECTION (S) ....... E/W DATE ............... 8/23/2001 TIME ............... 12:00 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.40 MPH Speed Analysi~ Ver. 2.00A/McTPJtNS JEDEDIAH SMITH W/O CABRILLO 50TH PERCENTILE, SPEED ................. 35 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED ................. 38 10 MPH ~'ACE SPEED .......... 30 through 39 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .......... 86.5 CUM MPH NO. PCT. PCT. 0 0 0.0 0.0 1 0 0.0 0.0 2 0 0.0 0.0 3 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 00 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0.0 0 0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0 0 0.0 21 0 0 0 0..0 22 0 0 0 00 23 0 0 0 0 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 25 1 19 19 26 0 00 19 27 0 0.0 1 9 28 1 1.9 3 8 29 1 1.9 5.8 30 1 1.9 7.7 31 4 7.7 15.4 32 1 1.9 17.3 33 8 15.4 32.7 34 6 11.5 44.2 35 6 11.5 55.8 36 3 5.8 61.5 37 4 7.7 69.2 38 9 17.3 86.5 39 3 5.8 92 3 40 0 0.0 92 3 41 1 1.9 94 2 42 3 5.8 100 0 43 0 0.0 100 0 44 0 0.0 100 0 45 0 0.0 100.0 46 0 0.0 100.0 >46 0 0.0 100.0 PERCENT PERCENT RANGE Ot VEHICLE, AVERAGE CUMULATIVE + .... + .... + .... +- 100 90 80 7O 60 50 10 + .... + .... + .... +- 0 10 OVER PACE SPEED ............ 7.7 UNDER PACE SPEED ........... 5.8 SPEEDS ................. 25 to 42 OBSERVED ..................... 52 SPEED ....................... 35.2 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---+ .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + *****10 ** 90 8O * 7O * 6O 5O 40 30 2O * 10 .--+ .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + 20 30 40 PERCENT VS. + .... + .... + .... +-. 15 10 SPEED (MPH) --+ .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + + .... + .... + .... +- 20 I ~ .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + .... + 0 10 30 40 15 10 Street: ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SECTION 627) / Vallejo Avenue between Santiago Road and Ynez Ro!d Year of Survey: 2001 PART I: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT Date of Survey August 22, 2001 50"' Percentile I 85th Percentile 37 MPH I 43 IVI~PH 10 mph pace (% of vehicles) 30 TO 39 MPH (63.3°A Posted Speed Limit Not Posted PART Il: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Covered Number of Accidents Intersection Mid-Block Mid-Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles Expected Mid-Block Accident Rate PART III: June 1, 1999- June 30, 20101 0 0 0.00/MVM 3.00/MVM ! HIGHWAY, TRAFFIC AND ROADSDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date of Observation August 2001 Highway: Geometrics, Narrow roadwa5 access(driveways, intersections, other) driveways to estate homes Traffic: Pedestrians, on-street parking Not Applicable turnover, school crossings Roadside: Land uses not apparent Not Applicable (park, school, etc...) other conditions PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS RECOMMENDED SPEED 35 MPH ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SECTION 627) Street: Vallejo Avenue between Ynez Road and La Paz Road! Year of Survey: 2001 PART I: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT Date of Survey August 22, 2001 50tI' Percentile I 85th Percentile 39 MPH I 44 IM PH 10 mph pace (% of vehicles) 34 TO 43 MPH (58.6%~ Posted Speed Limit Not Posted PART II: ACCIDENT RECORD Time Period Covered Number of Intersection Accidents Mid-Block Mid-Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles Expected Mid-Block Accident Rate June 1, 1999 -June 30, 2001 0 1 3.59/MVM 3.00AMVM PART III: HIGHWAY, TRAFFIC AND ROADSIDE CHARACTE~ISTICS Date of Observation Auoust 2001 High~vay: Geometrics, access(driveways, intersections, other Traffic: Pedestrians, on-street parking turnover, school crossings Roadside: Land uses not apparent (park, school, etc...) other conditions PART IV: Narrow roadway with numerou driveways to estate homes Not Applicable Not Applicable ADDITIONAL REMARKS RECOMMENDED SPEED 35 MPH NOT READILY APPARENT ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY' (CVC SECTION 627) Street: Vallejo Avenue between La Paz Road and Ynez Road Year of Survey: 2001 PART I: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT IDate of Survey August 22, 2001 50", Percentile185 'Percentile 29 MPH I 39 ~PH 10 mph pace (% of vehicles) 21 TO 30 MPH (75.0%t Posted Speed Limit Not Posted PART II: ACCIDENT RECORD; Time Period Covered Intersection Number of Accidents June 1, 1999 -June 30, 2001 PART iii: Date of Observation Mid-Block 0 Mid-Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00/MVM Expected Mid-Block Accident Rate 3.00/MVM / HIGHWAY, TRAFFIC AND ROADSDE CHARAcTERIsTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Highway: Geometrics, access(driveways, intersections, other Traffic: Pedestrians, on-street parking turnover, school crossings Roadside: Land uses not apparent (park, school, etc...) other conditions Aueust 2001 Narrow roadway with numerou driveways to estate homes Not Applicable Not Applicable PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS t RECOMMENDED SPEED 35 MPH F:\gonzalj\e&tsmmnary form ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SECTION 627) Street: Vallejo Avenue between Ynez Road and Cabrillo Ro-' Year of Survey: 2001 PART I: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT Date of Survey Auc, ust 22, 2001 50th Percentile° I 85"* Percentile 35 MPH I 39 MPH 10 mph pace (¼ of vehicles) 30 TO 39 MPH (90.0~ Posted Speed Lira t Not Posted PART II: ACCIDENT RECORDI Time Period Covered June 1, 1999 -June 30, 2001 0 Accidents Mid-Block 0 Number of Intersection Mid-Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00/MVM Expected Mid-Block Accident Rate 3.00/MVM PART III: Date of Observation Highway: Geometrics, access(driveways, intersections, other Traffic: Pedestrians, on-street parking turnover, school crossings Roadside: Land uses not apparent (park, school, etc...) other conditions HIGHWAY, TRAFFIC AND ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT August 2001 Narrow roadway with numerods driveways to estate homes Not Applicable Not Applicable PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS I RECOMMENDED SPEED 35 MPH AND TRAF ] ENGINEERING FIC SURVEY (CVC SECTION 627) Street: Jedediah Smith Road between State Route 79 and Y~ Year of Survey: 2001 PART I: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT Date of Survey I Aueust 23, 2001 50t~, Percentile I 85~ Percentile [ 35 MPH [ 38 MPH 10 mph pace (% of vehicles) 30 TO 39 MPH (86.5~ Posted Speed Limit Not Posted ez Road PART II: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Covered June 1, 1999 - June 30, 20101 Number of Intersection 0 Accidents Mid-Block 0 IVIid-Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles Expected Mid-Block Accident Rate O.O0/MVM 3.00/MVM PART III: Date of Observation High~vay: Geometrics, access(driveways, intersections, othm Traffic: Pedestrians, on-street parking turnover, school crossings Roadside: Land uses not apparent (park, school, etc...) other conditions HIGHWAY, TRAFFIC AND ROADSIDE CHARACT]~RISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT August 2000 Driveways to roadway Not Applicable Not Applicable P~LRT IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS RECOMMENDED SPEED 35 MPH ITEM NO. 3 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: AGENDA REP1 Public/Traffic Safety Commission /~Ali Moghadam, P.E., Senior Engineer, September 27, 2001 Item 3 RT affic Status Report ~ In-Pavement Amber LED Flashing Lights for Crosswalks RECOMMENDATION: That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission receive the status repot ~t and provide further direction to staff. BACKGROUND: Staff received a request from Public/Traffic Safety Commissioner 12 onnerton to place this item on the agenda for review, discussion and further consideration. The public has teen notified of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission's consideration of this matter through the agenda notification process. 13 2000 the Public/Traffic Safe~ Co · .I . , At the meeting of July , , ty ram~ssmn recmvea a presentation on In- Pavement Amber LED Flashing Lights for uncontrolled midblock ctrosswalk locations from Mr. Jeff York representing JTB Supply Company. Following the approval of the recommendation to receive and file the presentation, the Commission requested that staff oblain additional information and provide a status update after approval of the device by Caltrans. Toldate, Caltrans has not approved the use of In-Pavement Amber Flashing Lights for Crosswalks as a standard traffic control device. As it was discussed at the July 2000 meeting, Caltrans is currently testtng the device in Northern California. In addition to the Northern California location, the device is being tested in downtown Laguna Beach at two locations along Pacific Coast Highway. The two locations that were selected, previously had uncontrolled striped crosswalks that were heavily used by downtown pedesthan traffic. The cost to install the device at two locations was approximately $721000. This demonstration project will evaluate the effectiveness of the device and the public's perception of the device. Caltrans District 12 representatives indicate that the results of the demonstration project will be presented to headquarters sometime in September 2002 for consideration as an official traffic control device. When and if the device is accepted as an official traffic control devicte, Caltrans will need to develop guidelines and criteria for the use of In-Pavement Flashing Lights f~r Crosswalks. Since currently there are no guidelines or criteria available for the ~nstallation of this device, staff recommends that we continue to monitor the Laguna Beach demonlstration project and present the results of their evaluation at a future meeting. 1 r:\l 'affic\commissnXagendaX2001\0927\Flashing Crosswalks/ajp FISCAL IMPACT: None Attachment: 1. Exhibit "A" Minutes of the Public/Traffic Safety Commissi6n Meeting- July 13, 2001 2 r:\l affic\commlssn\agendak2001\0927\Fl~shing Crosswalks/ajp MINUTES OF A REGUL/R MEETING OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION JULY 13, 2000 CALL TO ORDER The City of Temecula Public/Traffic Safety Commission Convened in a regular meeting at 6:01 P.M., on Thursday, July 13, 2000, in the City CoUncil Chambers of Temecula City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. / FLAG SALUT~E The audience was led in the Flag salute by Commissioner Coe. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Co , Edwards, Katan, Lanier, and Chairman Connertc~n. Absent: None. Also Present: Director of Public Works Hughes, Senior Engineer M6ghadam, Associate Engineeri Gonzalez, Police Chief Domenoe, Police Sergeant Di~aggio, Battalion Chief Ritchey, Administrative Secretary Pyle, and Minute Clerk Hansen. PUBLIC COMMENTS No comments. COMMISSION CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the Minutes of June 8, 2000. Police Sergeant DiMaggio relayed that on page 3 of the; inutes, in the penultimate paragraph, that the word approximately should be added[prior to the phrase 12 hours a week. MOTION: Commissioner Coe moved to approve the minutes, as revised. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Edwards and voice vot~ reflected unanimous approval. COMMISSION BUSINESS 2. Request for Multi-Way Stop Installation - Hon 3rs Drive at Balata Drive/Vardon Drive RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommend that the City Council adopt a resolution establishing multi-way stop controls at the intersection of Honors Ddve at Balata Drive/Vardon Drive. Senior Engineer Moghadam provided the staff report (of !record), noting that this issue had been agendized due to the receipt of a petition from the Temeku Hills Community residents; relayed that based on a warrant analysis evaluation that this area d d not meet the warrants for installation of a multi-way stop sign with respect to the volumes and the number of accidents; advised, however, that based on the sight distance analysis (not ng the speeds of 37 MPH, although the speed limit was posted at 30 MPH) that due to the s ted stance restriction, staff was recommending, establiShment of an all-way stop at this intersection; and noted that if the Commission recommended the installation, that the project would not be implemented until such time as these particular streets were designated City streets (which could be potentially in apir0ximately 30 days). / Chairman Connerton relayed that based on his visit to this particular area, it was his opinion that the all-way stop would, additionally, enhanc~ the safety at the proximate golf cart crossing. MOTION: Commissioner Coe moved to approve staff's recommendation. The motion wa~nded by Commissioner Lanier and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. Commissioner Coe noted that, historically, this was the City's most expedient Commission approval of a recommendation for a stop s~gn. 3. In-Pavement Amber LED Flashing Lights for Crosswalks RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission review and evaluate the feasibility of installing In-Pavement Amber LED Lights for crosswalks and make a recommendation to the City Council. [ Senior Engineer Moghadam relayed that this item had b[een agendized due to the request of Chairman Connerton; and noted that representatives from the JTB Supply Company would provide an overview of the In-Pavement Amber LED Lights for crosswalks, inclusive of a video presentation. / Chairman Connerton relayed that this product had firstb[een introduced to him via a television program, noting his subsequent further investigation. Mr. Jeff York, representing JTB Supply Company, provided a history of the development of the In-Pavement Amber LED Lights for crosswalks, n, )ting the similarity to airport runway lighting; advised that this product was not desig)~ed for signalized intersections due to the plethora of existing lights at intersections, clar!fying that it was developed for placement at unprotected crosswalks (i.e., school, or paik crossings); relayed that currently there were approximately 15 locations in southern California where this product had been installed and was operational, citing specific Iocabons; provided a video presentation which relayed the statistics related to fatalities of pedestrians in crosswalks, demonstrating the application of the project, noting the visibility of the lights at a distance up to 1500 feet; and provided an actual demonstration of the product for the Commission in the Council Chambers, relaying the activating system installation for the lighting system. For Chairman Connerton, Mr. York relayed that Caltran.~ various locations in northern California; advised that the and specifying the typical street had installed the system in device had been approved by the California Traffic Control Commission; further specifi 9d the installation process; reiterated that this device was not recommended at hght,ed intersections, noting the restrictions related to tying the device to the controls at the intersections, advising that he could relay the request for additional investigation for installment at lighted intersections to the company. Ms. Rose Lee Cunningham representing JTB Supply Cc would most likely approve the device in approximately mpany relayed that Caltrans ecember of 2000. In response to Commissioner Edwards, Mr. York relayed that at night, the driver awareness was increased by approximately seventy-fiv~ to eighty percent (75-80%) with the installation, noting that during daylight hours awareness was increased by approximately fifty-five to sixty percent (55-60%); advised that the effectiveness of the product was due to the fact that it was pedestrian activa!ed, noting that it was not always flashing. / For Commissioner Coe, Mr. York relayed that the close;['location or' a device was in the City of Orange, providing additional information regardin!g that site. In response to Commissioner Katan's queries, regardingI the effectiveness of utilizing the device as a speed deterrent (i·e., to activate the lighting system when drivers reach a certain speed), Mr. York re ayed that the device had bebn installed preceding a blind crosswalk in order to warn drivers of the coming crossw~,lk (which was also flashing); provided additional information regarding alternate instailations, noting the multi-faceted effectiveness of the device. In response to Commissioner Coe, Police Sergeant DiMaggio relayed that he did not have enough information to provide an opinion with respect to the device; and for .Chairman Connerton, noted that the City of Temecula had not had significant negative ~mpacts at unsignalized crosswalks. For Senior Engineer Moghadam, Mr. York relayed that if the device was activated by children at play, the lights would only flash for 20-25 seconds, noting that with the existing installations that there had not been a significani negative impact associated with unnecessary activation of the system. Prior to the data revealing that the device was not developed for lighted intersections, Chairman Connerton relayed that he had had several re~:ommended locations in the City where the device could be effective; noted that the La Serena crosswalk proximate to the school and the park site might be a potential location for this installation; advised that after obtaining additional information that the Commission may at a future date make a recommendation to the City Council regarding the device[ Commissioner Coe relayed that the issue could be agendized for a future date, after obtaining the additional data, and identifying appropriate recommended locations for the system. Commissioner Katan relayed that he was impressed withlthe technology, not ng that he could see the merits of recommending installation of the ~ystem at an initial location in order to further evaluate the effectiveness. I Commissioner Lanier concurred with the need for additional information; queried whether there were other companies manufacturing the s~ystem. In response, Chairman Connerton relayed that via the investigation that he had donducted that there was not an alternate similar system. In light of the information regarding the lack of significant negative pedestrian impacts at crosswalks in the City of Temecula, Commissioner Edwards relayed that at th s t me she would not recommend the installation; noted that for a futL~re date, after additional information was obtained, an appropriate location for the device could be the crosswalk at Rancho Elementary School Chairman Connerton advised that it would be appropriate for the City to take a proactive - -approach at identifying potential sites for the installation, 3oting that traffic would be -increasing. Commissioner Coe relayed that additional information co JId be obtained from data with respect to crosswalks that have been requested to be insialled by community residents, that the Commission had subsequently not recommended for installation due to the unsafe aspects of an uncontrolled crosswalk, relaying th"t the additional investigation may reveal locations appropriate for this type of system. Director of Public Works Hughes noted that the system .was still in the n t a stages of development; reiterated that Caltrans had not adopted the device as a uniform traffic control device, advising that until that approval, it was his[opinion that unless there was a severe negative impact with re§Pect to pedestrian injuries in crosswalks that he would not recommend the installations; provided additional info~mation regardino the coal to minimize conflict points with respect to traffic; and noted {hat vehicles wo~ld no~' be required to stop for the lighted crosswalks which could prowde a false sense of safety for pedestrians. Hu hes' co In response to Director of Public Works g mments, Chairman Connerton relayed that although it was illegal, at times pedestrians c~rossed the street where there were no crosswalks; relayed that after additional investigation, that t may be shortsighted to not consider the installations at certain locations (i.e., the unprotected crosswalk at La Serena); and relayed that if the Commission at a future date made a recommendation, the City Council would provide specified direction. Commissioner Edwards concurred with filing the data, and obtaining additional information; and noted that she would not recommend installabon, until Caltrans had approved the device. Chairman Connerton recommended a fact-finding proces~ at this time with respect to this system. I fP W k VVhile not desiring to ignore the potential of any new deviqe, Director o ublic or s Hughes relayed the process of determining the appropriate technical devices to be implemented for addressing traffic impacts. Chairman Connerton relayed that the Commission would requesting that staff obtain additional information and inc Engineer's Report; and concurred with Commissioner Ed sought after Caltrans' approval. receive and file this data, ude updates in the Traffic Nards, that this data could be Commissioner Lanier recommended that when staff obtained additional data, that specific information be investigated regarding the total costs associated with the installations. Chairman Connerton thanked Mr. York and Ms. Cunnin presentation. TRAFFIC ENGINEER'S REPORT Senior Engineer Moghadarn' i'~t~oduc~d Signal '~ Commission, commending his excellent work in ti ham for their excellent chnician Bill Brown to the te City. Via supplemental agenda material, Senior Engineer Moghadam provided the Commission a copy of the collision report for the month of June. d For Commission Edwar s, Senior Engineer Moghadam relayed that plans are currently under design for the restriction of all leftlturns at the Target Center. Chairman Connerton provided additional information regarding the internal i m_odir, cat_i._ons to the_parking area at the center. P_O _ C EPOR A. Poi ce Set:geant DiMaggio noted that on July 14th~ the Police Department would have in force the roving DUI Task Force, and that red light enforcement would also be taking place in the City. B. Police Sergeant DiMaggio noted the Police D~ rtment would be purchasing a new Police Motorcycle. C. For informational purposes, Police Sergeant DiM aggio relayed that Officer Liggett would be transferring to the Pen'is Police Department, noting that Officer Matt Hughes would be the new motorcycle Officer taking h~s place. D. Chairman Connerton commended the Police Del~artment for the effective d~recbon of the traffic at the C~ty s 4t~ of July Event. FIRE CHIEF'S REPORT A. Battalion Chief Ritchey noted that there had been area. COMMISSION REPORTS A. minor vegetation fires in the Echoing previous comments, Commissioner Lan,ier commended the Police Department and the Fire Department for their diligent efforts with respect to the successful 4u~ of July Event. Via community comments, Commiss oner Edwards re ayed the queries regard ng whether or not the Police Department had decre'~sed enforcement in the Via Cordoba area. In response to community comments, Commissioner Edwards relayed queries regarding when the community meeting in the North General Kearny area would be scheduled, h For Commissioner Edwards, Fire Battalion Ritc .ey relayed that there was currently a fundraising event taking place for th~ Local Chapter of CDF Firefighters. Per citizen request, Commissioner Katan requested staff to investigate the timing at the following signal locations: 1) the Ynez Ro~ad signal for left movements into the K-mart shopping center, and 2) the left-hand turning lane on Jefferson Avenue (south) onto Rancho California Road. In response to Chairman Connerton's queries, relayed that the caps were intentionally left off t Road/Overland Drive area until the developmer Chairman Connerton commented on the street developers, noting that after the street was cap across (i.e., for installation of irrigation); and q~ more effective schedule mandated. Per the comments of four citizens, Chairman investigate the timing at the signal at Ynez Roa the stacking impacts. ADJOURNMENT Director of Public Works Hughes ~e street project in the Ynez in this area was completed. ~idening projects constructed by )ed, the street would be cut ;ried whether there could be a (~nnerton reque;~ed staff to into the Tower Center, noting At 7:28 P.M. Chairman Connerton formally adjourned 27, 2000 at 6:00 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Temecula. 3is meeting to Thursday, July Business Park Drive, Administrative Secretary Anita Pyle Chairman Darrell L.. Connerton ITEM NO. 4 TRAFFIC ENGINEER'S REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council William G. Hughes, Director of Public Wc September 25, 2001 Department of Public Works Monthly Acti APPROVAL II ClTYATTORNEY __ I[ DIRECTOROFFINANCE I C TYMANAGER J rks/City Engineer iity Report RECOMMENDATION: Attached for City Council's review and filing is the Department of Public Works' Monthly Activity Reports for the month of August, 2001. MOACTRPT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT Monthly Activity Rep August/September PROJECTS orr I)01 Prepared By: Ward Maxwell Checked by: Amer Attar Submitted by: William G. Hughes Date: September 25, 2001 1. First Street B idgeROJECTSP UNDER CONSTRUCTION This project will construct First Street from Pujol Street to Old Town Front Street, including the construction of a bridge over Mun'ieta Creek and the realignment of Santiago RoAd. Contractor has f'mished the f'mal punch list items on the street portion of the work. Construction of the EMWD lift station is complete with only punch list items remaining. 2. Pala Road Bridge Environmental Restoration/Median and Parkway Landscape Improvements The project installed landscape improvements along Pala Road and Cupeno Lane and restored the wetlands in the construction zone. It included the installation of an irrigation sy~ tern, planting, and hydroseeding. Median and parkway work is complete. Plant establishment period and 5- ,ear maintenance began in June. 3. Pala Road Soundwalls Work on this project includes the construction of masonry block soundwalls on Pala Road from west of Rainbow Canyon Road to east of Club House Drive. Notice of Co }letion is going to Council 09/25/01. 4. Murrieta Creek Crossing Between Winchester and Rancho California Road _ Low.flow Crossing at: Via Montezuma I This project will construct a low-flow crossing of Murrieta Cree~k connecting Diaz and Del Rio at Via Montezuma. In addition, this project will rehabilitate the street of Via Montezuma. This project is complete. Recording a conservation easement is in progress for the mitigation of the disturbed area. 5. City Maintenance Facility Alterations, Phase III This project will modify the existing two story masonry block buildi~ tg to accommodate a new second floor of office space over the existing two-story maintenance bay, includin te installation of an elevator, and two new second floor restrooms. Rough framing, electrical, and plumbing is ~ early complete with the installation of the elevator underway. Progress is being made on both the interior ~mprovements and the new single story addition. 6. Margarita Road Widening, Pauba Road to Dartolo Road I This project will widen Margarita Road from Pio Pico to Dartolo Roadl and re-landscape the medians from De Portola to SR 79 South. Included with ' . · I . th~s project ~s the pavement rghabflitation of Phase 1/(Pauba Road to Pin Pico. The contractor has completed the street work, some median island work will continue. The two R:W/onthlyActivityReport\Cl~200BAugust.doc traffic signals at Pio Pico and at De Portola should be in a full -actuation mode on 9/19/01. The plant maintenance period will conclude at the end of this year. _ 7. Rancho California Sports Park Culvert Modification This project modifies the existing culvert in order to eliminate slope erosion problem The Project is complete. Not~ce of Completion approved at the August 28, 2001 City Council meeting. 8. Traffic Signal installation at Stonewood and Margarita A traffic signal will be installed at the intersection of Margarita Road and Stonewood Drive. The traffic signal was turned on 8/30/01. 9. Pavement Management System, Jefferson Avenue This project will rehabilitate Jefferson Avenue from the no~herly C ty limits to Overland Drive. The work is complete with the Notice of Completion pending. 10. Senior Center Expansion The expansion will include an addition of 3000 square feet to the ex: sting building. The expansion will be for recreational, office, and meeting purposes. A contract was awarded to R. Moody Construction on June 26 in the amount of $508,500. Expansion will include the addition of 3000 square feet of building area for recreational, office and meeting purposes. The Contractor has completed the demolition work. The foundation concrete pour was done September 11 and framing started. / / 11. Pavement Management System - Citywide / This project will involve rehabilitating the pavement of variou~ streets in the City for FY 2000-01. McLaughlin Engineering and Mining Corp. was awarded a contract at the June 26 Council meeting in the amount of $2,073,000. The roads scheduled for construction are Rahcho California Road, Mira Loma Drive, La Paz Road, Winchester Road (Between Diaz and Enterprise Circle West), Southbound Ynez Road (Between Winchester and Overland), Main Street, Enterprise Circle West (Sc uth of Winchester), and Overland Drive (Between Margarita and Ynez). The project is essentially Complete Traffic Striping and punch list items are all that remain. 12. AC Street Repairs - FY2001 This project will rehabilitate and reconstruct selected City streets Cunningham Davis was awarded the contract at the June 26 Council meeting in the amount of$117,000. The roads scheduled for construction are Margarita Road at Avenida Cima Del Sol, Jefferson Avenue at Del Rio, Overland Drive at Commerce Center, Enterprise Circle West at Rider Way, and Diaz Road at Rancho W~y. The project is essentially Complete. Traffic Striping and punch list items are all that remain. 13. Chaparral High School Swimming Pool [ A 25-yard x 25-meter pool will be built at Chaparral High SchoQLI The facility will include a smaller recreation pool component and a bathhouse with locker room facilities, restrooms and showers. Spray-type play equipment will be included as an element in the base constructio~ bid. The Notice to Proceed was issued for August 13, 2001, and work is expected to be completed by March 2002. The contractor is working at relocating the underground utilities and both pool excavations are n~arly completed. 2 R:hMonthlyActivityReport\CIPL2001 ~August.d~c Road. Elite Bobcat Service, Inc. was awarded the contract at the luly 24 Council meeting in the amount of $51,790. Work on this project is essentially complete. Contractor ~s scheduled to finish the final punch list items by September 21. 15. Street Name Sign Replacement This project will entail removing the existing wooden signs in the La Serena area and replacing them with plastic signs selected by the Public Traffic Safety Commission. The signs have been pumhased and City forces will start installing the new signs shortly. PROJECTS BEING ADVERTI, NONE IED FOR BIDS PROJECTS IN DESIGN 1. Pala Road Improvements - Phase II (79 South to Pechan a Road) This project will widen Pala Road to its ultimate width from the ,ala Road Bridge to Pechanga road. Plan check comments (70% Submittal) were returned to the consultant. ~ 9'ork is proceeding on the remainder of the design. The approval of Wolf Creek Drainage Basin Study by R 2FC & WCD has been delayed because hydrology studies upstream of Wolf Creek require prior approval fr >m RCFC & WCD. Staffwill be using an apprmser to assist in the preparation of the real estate apprmsal report. The project ~s funded for design only at this time. 2. Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Over Murrieta iCreek This project will widen Rancho California Bridge over Murrieta Creek to provide four additional traffic lanes. Consultant is investigating potential lateral spreading and scour and ways to mitigate these impacts. 90% drawings will be submitted shortly after analysis is complete. 3. Temecula Library A full service library, approximately 34,000 square feet in area, will be designed and built on Pauba Road,just west of Fire Station #84. This project will provide the communitylwith library resources and services. The design is progressing on schedule. Utility services construction is b~ing' coordinated with PanbaRoad, PhaselI project. Staff returned checked plans to architect on 8/28/01. Architect is working on the final plans. Utility services construction will be coordinated with Pauba Road, Phase li Street Improvements. 4. Pauba Road Improvements - Phase II (Margarita Road , Showalter Road) [ This project will widen Pauba Road from Showalter to just west of Margarita Road to its ultimate width. The 3 R:~¥lonthlyActivityRepo~ClP~200 BAugust.doc project is in design and the work is being coordinated with design ol being addressed. 90% design plans were submitted to the City for re staff and were returned to Consultant for completion of final desig~ 5. Murrieta Creek Bridge - Overland Drive Extension to Diaz This project will entail alignment studies and the design of an exten Road, which includes a new bridge over Murrieta Creek. The projec from Jefferson Avenue to Commerce Center Drive, and the extensio to Diaz Road. Project Design Consultant (PDC), the designer, has c currently reviewing the document. 6. 1-15 Northbound On-Ramp Widening at Winchester Road This project will re-stripe westbound Winchester Road from Ynez l~ for a better flow of traffic. The City applied for an Encroachment Caltrans has just issued the Encroachment Permit. Specs will be put bid during the next period. the library project. All utility issues are wew. Plans and specs were reviewed by dans. m of Overland Drive, westerly to Diaz :includes the widening of Overiand Drive of Overland Drive across Murrieta Creek )mpleted the alignment study and staff is )ad to 1-15 northbound on-ramp to allow Permit from Caltrans to do the striping. together and the project will be informally 7. New Temecula Sports Complex A new 40+ Acres sports complex will be built on Pale Road at Wolf _Valley. A soils report was completed and forwarded to the City The soils report indicated substantial and costly removals. Staff is evaluating options on preparing the site or ~hoosing a different site. The consultant, RJM Design is finishing up the preliminary master plan of the sports complex. 8. Diaz Road Realignment Under this project, Diaz Road will be realigned to Vincent Moraga Road at Rancho California Road. Business Park Drive will be a T-intersection at Diaz. In response to additional design cost requests by the designer, City staff has elected to complete the design in-house. Anticipated design completion is scheduled for November 2001. C 9. Rancho California Road Median Modifications at Town enter a Road in front of the The project will include the closing of the two meaian openings op Kancno camom~ Town Center, while lengthening the left turn lanes at Ynez Road, Town Center Drive, and Via Los Colinas to improve traffic circulation. The design is 80% complete with the exception of the landscaping. Landscaping design is currently at 50% completion. I 10. Rancho California Road Widening at Ynez Road (Add right turn lane to westbound lanes) This project will add a right mm lane on westbound Rancho California Road at Ynez Road. Right of way acquisition at the northeast comer of Rancho Californm and Ynez ~vtll be reqmred. In-house design is 90% complete. / 11. Landscaping and Sidewalk On 79 South (Front Street to Pala Road) The project consists of the design and construction of new sidewglk,/landscaping, and irrigation along the south side of State Highway 79 South between Pale Road and Old Town Front Street. A design consultant has been selected and a professional services contract will be awarded when a funding agreement between the County and City is finalized. 4 R:'~vl onthlyActivityReporl\C1PL2001 ~Au gust .dec 12. Alignment Study for Murrleta Creek Bridge Between Wine ;ter Road and Temecula~s C~-~ !-knits-- and Diaz Road Extension This study will determine the alignment and location of the Murrieta Creek crossing between Winchester Road to the northem City Limits. In addition, the study will be combined with the Diaz Road Extension alignment study and design. Coordination with the City of Murrieta, Flood Control and Army Corps of Engineers is necessary. The Consultant and Staff met with Riverside County Flood Control to discuss possible alignments. The study is currently underway. PROJECTS THAT ARE SUSPENE ED OR ON-HOLD 1. Margarita Road/Winchester Road Intersection Improvements Project is on hold. Under this project, an additional left turn frolm eastbound Winchester to northbound Margarita will be added in order to accommodate increasing traffic ¢olumes. Design is 50% complete· Project will require a Caltrans encroachment permit. 2. Pujol Street Sidewalk Improvements - Phase II This project will complete the knuckle at the intersection of Sixth ~ feet and Felix Valdez. The project is on hold. 3. Winchester Road Widening Between Enterprise CircleI efferson This project will add a right turn lane from Eastbound Winchester to Southbound Jefferson, starting at Enterprise Circle. O'Malley Engineering Corporation has provided the design survey data. Project is on hold. 4. Traffic Signals Design at Pala Road and Loma Linda, and at Pain Road and W°lf Valley Two new traffic signals will be installed on Pala Road, one at Lom! Linda and the other at Wolff Valley. The plans and specifications are complete The project Is being coordinated with Pechang Development Corporation sewer project. This project is on hold due to environmental constrain ! 5. Pala Road Interim Improvements - (Widening to accommo[date four lanes from Loma Linda Bridge to Wolf Valley) I Pala Road Interim Improvements (58 feet in width) will be comple!ed with the second phase of construction the Pala Road Trunk Sewer (Pechanga Development Corporatio~n project). An encroachment permit was issued for the construction of the trunk sewer and the interim street improvements. Traffic signal and striping plans are complete. The construction of Pala Road Trunk Sewer ( Phase Two) by the Pechanga Development Corporation from Clubhouse Drive to the new Pechanga Casino E riveway (600 feet southeast of Wolf Valley Road) started November 6, 2000 and the approximate completion date is Spring 2001. The interim project is on hold due to environmental constraints. 6. Santa Gertrudis Bridge Widening at 1-15 5 R:~Vl on thlyActivityRepor t\CIP~2001 ~Augus t-doc This is Phase II of the Southbound Auxiliary Lane project at the southbound exit ramp for Winchester Road. Santa Gertrud~s Creek Bridge to provide an This project will widen the 1-15 southbound exit-ramp at the I . . . additiohal lane 0n the exit ramp just no-rth of Winchester Road. Staff is revisiting the ments~fi/ light of the proposed Project Study Report for Cherry Street Interchange. The study shows that this bridge may have to be removed in the future to accommodate the Cherry Street Interchange. This project is suspended indefinitely. 7. Santiago Road/Ynez Road Intersection Improvements This project will widen, realign, and adjust the traffic signal timing of the existing intersection. This project has been delayed indefinitely. The Traffic Dxv~smn completed some minor striping and s~gnal adjustments that improved traffic movement through the intersection. 6 R:~/lonthlyActivityReport\C/P~200 l~August.doc I-- Z .i ill 0 n ii ILl {-- Z LU U.I n n TO: FROM: DATE: MEMORANDUM Bill Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Brad Buron, Maintenance Superintendent September 5, 2001 SUBJECT: Monthly Activity Report - August, 2001 The following activities were performed by Public Works Departme personnel for the month of August, 2001: I. SIGNS A. B. C. Total signs replaced Total signs installed Total signs repaired II. TREES A. Total trees tdmmed for sight distance and street: II1. ASPHALT REPAIRS A. Total square feet of A. C. repairs B. Total Tons iV. CATCH BASINS A. Total catch basins cleaned RIGHT-OF-WAY WEED ABATEMENT A. Total square footage for right-of-way abatement VI. GRAFFITI REMOVAL A. Total locations B. Total S.F. VII. STENCILING A. 338 New and repainted legends B. 400 L.F. of new and repainted red curb and stdpl ~t, Street Maintenance Division in-house 2O7 6 8 veeping concerns 27 1~206 29 13 13,950 27 2,615 lg Also, City Maintenance staff responded to 51 service order requests ranging from weed abatement, tree tdmming~ sign repair~-A.C, failures, litter removal, and catch basin cteaning .s .s .s .s .s .s .s .s .s~-T h ! s 60 service order requests for the month of July ~ 2001. The Maintenance Crew has also put in 72 hours of overtim which includes standby time, special events and response to street emergencies. The total cost for Street Maintenance performed by Contractor; for the month of Auflust~ 2001 was $ 25~710.00 compared to $ 31~430.00 for the month of July~ 2001. Account No. 5402 $ 20,250.00 Account No. 5401 $ 5,460.00 Account No. 999-5402 $ - 0 - Ron Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works Ali Moghadam, Senior Engineer - (CIP/Traffic) Greg Butler, Senior Engineer (Capital Improvements Amer Attar, Senior Engineer (Capital Improvements JerryAlegria, Senior Engineer - (Land Development) 0 0 ITEM NO. 5 POLICE CHIEF'S REPORT APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINAI~.E,~_ CITY MANAGER ~"~',~ TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Jim Domenoe, Chief of Police September 25, 2001 Monthly Departmental Report The following report reflects special teams, traffic enforcement and miscellaneous activity occurring during August of 2001. The Police Department responded to ttiirty-two "priority one" calls for service during the month of August, with an average response time of approximately 7.1 minutes. A total of 3,426 calls for po ce serv ce were generated ~n the C[[y th of Au ust This consisted of Po ce services continued within the Vail Ranch area during the mon g . both routine patrol and dedicated patrol activities. During the [month, a total of 103 calls for police service were noted. The majority of these calls were for non-criminal activity followed by traffic issues, t' During the month of August, the Temecula Police Departmen s Town Center storefront served a total of 251 customers. Fingerprinting services for this montht showed sixty prints taken, forty-one people filed police reports, twenty-three people had citations s~igned off and nine oversized vehicle permits were issued. Crime Prevention Officer Lynn Fanene participated in a number of special events and community oriented programs during the month.[ Officer Fanene completed monthly gate code verifications for six hous ng communities, four apartment complexes, one park and five storage facilities. He also provided a tour of the station facilityito members of the R~vers~de County Grand Jury on August 16th. Additionally, Officer Fanene assisted in the yearly City of Temecula Family Employee picnic on Sunday, August 11 th. Officer Fane~ne also continued to handle problem business and residential alarm calls and coordinated with the pl roperty/business owners in an effort to resolve the false alarms and the unnecessary ensuing reslonse by officers. The POP Team continued to work on the "Crime Free Multi Housing" project. At this time there is 70% compliance with this program across the City and they ar~ working with two complexes, which are in the final stages of certification. They are also in the process of working to re-certify four complexes that are continuing with the program. The team continued their Warrant Apprehens on Program dur ng the month, which resulted in one telony warrant arrest and five misdemeanor warrant arrests. Monthly Departmental Report Page 2 The POP Team continued with their proactive patrol efforts a ~d made two felony arrests and twenty- three misdemeanor arrests during the month of August. The Old Town Storefront serves as an office for the POP team and a location to assist the public with po ce services. This has greatly increased their availabiiity to serve the Old Town area. During August, the Old Town storefront served about a hundred customers, taking fingerprints, writing police reports and signing off citations. The traffic team reported that during the month of August there were 503 citations issued for hazardous violations, 229 citations were ssued for non-hazardous violations and 181 parking citations were issued. During the month there were thirteenlinjury traffic collisions, forty-one non- injury collisions were reported and twenty-six drivers were arrested for DUi. The monthly ERACIT program this month led to the arrest of one subject. The Neighborhood Enforcement Team (NET) program resulted in sixty-nine citations being issued. This program addresses traffic concerns in residential neighborhoods with a dedicated motor officer. The SLAP program (Stop Light Abuse Program) resulted in eighty-five citations being issued. ~ During the month of August, the POP officers assigned to th~e Promenade Mall handled a total of 141 calls for service. The majority of these calls were for ~hoplifting investigations. During the month, calls and on-sight activity resulted in the criminal arrest and filings on ten misdemeanors and two felony cases for various offenses. Three citations were also issued. Officers Robles and Rupe continued to provide training to secunty staff employees dunng the month. The mall officers worked on vehicle theft and burglary programs during the month because two vehicle thefts and two vehicle bur.qlaries were reported. The posse also increased their presence around the mall on weekends with frequent patrols of the parking areas. The school resource officers continued to remain active during August. Officer Kubel conducted two elementary school presentations The topics of those presentations were "Meet the SRO" and "School Safety. Add t ona y, a presentation by Officer Gos~ on the SRO Program also occurred. They also conducted counseling sessions with students. Officer Goss made one felony arrest for receiving stolen property. No other arrests were made dunng the month. School resource officers assisted in planning, and attended a conference at Chaparr~d High School during August for area and state school resource officers. The presentation lasted tt~ree days and featured instructors from various d sc p nes as presenters. Approximately 150 peopl~ attended the conference, which was viewed as a success by all who padicipated. Officer Bill Rahnlreplaced Officer Haar at the Temecula Valley High School campus and is settling in well in his new assignment. The JOLT program (Juven e Offender Law Enforcement Program) continues to be a success in part through its youth court program. Officer Sherry Adams codducted the seventy-first Youth Court session on August 2®. The JOLT officer assisted at other ~chools when needed and conducted follow-ups with parents of uveniles in the JOLT program. Officer Adams continued to work w~th At Risk" juveniles throughout the month and a so conducted counsehng sess ons w th their parents. She also assisted the District Attorneys Office and the Probation Department by providing training during home visits with incorrigible juveniles. Officer Adams made a misdemeanor arrest during August. During the month of August, the Special Enforcement Team handled a total of twenty-five cases. These cases resulted in felony arrests, primarily for narcotics violations. They also violations. These officers conducted two search warrants th~ misdemeanor arrests. This team continues to work street le,~el ,f Officers Rich Holder and John Morin twenty-three misdemeanor and eleven issued forty-one citations for various resulted in four felony arrests and five narcotics and specialty patrol within Monthly Departmental Report Page 3 the city on a pro-active basis. During this month the team was involved with registering narcotics offenders and conducting parole and probation searches. As a result of these programs the officers recovered quantities of methamphetamine and marijuana. Volunteers from the community continue to be an integral part of the Temecula Police Department's staff Under the guidance of volunteer coordinator Officei Eric Albert and assistant coordinator Gayle Gerrish, the Police Department's volunteer staff contributed 396 hours of service in August. Volunteer assignments include computer data input, logistici support, special event assistance, and telephone answering duties. The reserve officer program and mounted posse are ad~ditional valuable volunteer resources available to the police department. The police department utilizes reserve officers to assist with patrol, traffic enforcement, crime prevention, off road vehic e enforcement and a variety of special functions. Reserve police officers worked a total of 246 h( urs during the month (140 hours were specifically spent on patrol in Temecula). TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OFTEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City ManagedCity Council Jim Domenoe, Chief of Polic~ August 28, 2001 Monthly Departmental Report The following report reflects special teams, traffic enforceme~ CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANC~ CITY MANAGER ~t and miscellaneous activity occurring during July of 2001· The Police Depadment responded to th rty-nine "priority one" calls for service during the month of July, with an average response time of ,approximately 5.7 minutes. A total of 3,515 calls for police service were generated in the City of Temecula during the month. / Police services began this month in the Vail Ranch area. This consisted of both routine patrol and dedicated patrol activities. During the month, a total of 170 c~lls for police service were noted. The majority of these calls were for non-criminal activity followed by traffic issues. As a result of calls for service, several arrests were made for both misdemeanor and felony offenses. Dudng the month of July, the Temecula Police Department's ~rown Center storefront served a total of 204 customers. Fingerprinting services for this month shewed forty-four pdnts taken, thirty-four people filed police reports, thirteen people had citations s~gned off and eleven oversize vehicle permits were issued. Crime Prevention Officer Lynn Fanenb participated in a number of special events and community oriented programs during the mqnth. Officer Fanene completed a presentation on alcohol safety for the new Califomia Grille restaurant staff. He was also responsible for planning the public safety demonstration at Vail Ranch and was responsible for the command post organization at the Spods Park for the 4~ of July festivities. Officer Fanene conducted twenty- one residential security visits and five business visits during~ the month. He conducted forty-four visits to businesses for crime follow-up information. Officer[Fanene completed his article for the Valley Business Journal titled "Identity Theft--A Guide for Victims (Part 1 of 3)." The POP Team continued to work on the "Crime Free Multi Housing" project. At this time there is 70% compliance with this program across the City and they are working with two complexes, which in the final stages of certification. They are also in thelprocess of working to re-certify four are complexes that are continuing with the program. The team continued their Warrant Apprehension Program during the month, which resulted in two felony warrant arrests and eight misdemeanor warrant arrests. Monthly Departmental Report Page 2 The team continued with the Temecula Against Graffiti pro.c were observed. The team continued their Crime Free Part, ram during the month. No violations and Creek-side area program with frequent patrol checks. As a result of this program, four misde ~meanor arrests were made. They also conducted a "Bar Action Response" program and noted no violations. Additional programs in this area will be scheduled throughout the remaining summer months. An off-road vehicle enforcement program was held during the month with no reported vlolabons observed. The Old Town Storefront serves as an office for the POP te~m and a location to assist the public with police services. This has greatly increased their availability to serve the Old Town area. This month the Old Town storefront served 101 customers, four fi~gerprints were taken, fourteen police reports were written and three citations were signed off. The traffic team reported that during the month of July there were 480 citations issued for hazardous violations, eighty-eight citations were issued for non-hazardous violations and 108 parking citations were issued. During the month there was foudeen injuryltrafflc collisions, forty-six non-injury collisions were reported and thidy drivers were arrested for DUI. The monthly ERACIT program this month led to the arrest of three subjects for DUI. The Neighborhood Enforcement Team (NET) program resulted in seventy-two citations being issued. Th~s, program addresses traffic concerns in residential neighborhoods with a dedicated motor officer. The SLAP program (Stop Light Abuse Program) resulted in sixty-six citations being issued. During !he month the team was responsible for the planning of the 4~ of July parade and subsequent activities at the Sports Park. These events ~were held· ' had large crowds ~n attendance (approximately 20,000) and without incident. During the month of July, the POP officers assigned to the P!omenade Mall handled a total of 133 calls for service. The majority of these calls were for shoplifting investigations. During the month, calls and on-sight activity resulted in the criminal arrest and filings on seven misdemeanors, three felony cases for various offenses and six citations were ~ssued. Officers Robles and Rupe will be continuing with providing training to security staff emp oyeesI dur ng the month The mall officers worked on both a vehicle theft program dunng the month and a vehicle burglary prevenbon program. There were no reported auto thefts or vehicle burglaries as a result of their efforts. The posse also increased their presence around the mall on weekends with frequent patrols of the parking areas. The school resource officers continued to remain active during summer school. During the past month, a presentabon was conducted for Stranger DangeI. They also conducted counseling sess ons wth students. No arrests were made during the month. School resource officers were revolved w~th planmng a conference at Chaparral H~gh School beginning ~n August for area and state school resource officers. Th~s presentation ~s anticipated to last three days and will feature ~nstructors from various d~sc~phnes as presenters. At th~s t~me, reg strat on for the conference is estimated to exceed 150 people. Officer Bill Rahn ~s replacing Officer Dave Haar at the Temecula Valley High School campus. As a result, Officer Rahn is attending a forty-hour basic training course for school resource officers in Redlands. I t t b rt The JOLT program (Juvenile Offender Law Enforcement Program) con inues o e a success in pa through its youth court program. Deputy Sherry Adams conducted the seventy-first youth court session during the month. The JOLT officer assisted at otherschools when needed and conducted follow-ups with parents of juveniles in the JOLT program. Del~uty Adams continued to work with at risk juveniles throughout the month and also conducted counseling sessions with their parents. Deputy Adams assisted the District Attorneys Office and the Probation Department by providing training during home visits with incorrigible juveniles. Deput3 Adams also had several cenvictions for various violations involving juvenile offenders during the ~ nonth. Monthly Departmental Report Page 3 During the month of Ju~y, the Special Enforcement Team of Officers Rich Holder and John Morin handled a total of sixty cases. These cases resulted in forty-t~' tee misdemeanor and eighteen felony arrests, pnmardy for narcotics wolat~ons. They also ~ssued fo~rty-one c~tat~ons for various wolat~ons. This team continues to work street level narcotics and specia!ty patrol within the city on a proactive basis. During this month the team was involved with registering narcotics offenders and conducting parole and probation searches. As a result of these programs the officers recovered quantities of methamphetamine, marijuana, heroin and hallucinogenic mushrooms. Volunteers from the community continue to be an integral part of the Temecula Police Department's staff. Under the guidance of volunteer coordinator Officer Eric Albert and assistant coordinator Gayle Gerrish, the Police Department's volunteer staff contributed 638 hours of service in July. Volunteer assignments include computer data input, logistics SUpport, special event assistance, and telephone answering duties. The reserve officer program and mounted posse are additional valuable volunteer resources available to the police department. The police department ~ltilizes reserve officers to assist with patrol, traffic enforcement, crime prevention, off road vehicle enforcement and a variety of special funct ons. Reserve police officers worked a tota of 205 hours dur ng the month (125 hours were specifically spent on patrol in Temecula). The posse contributed 190 hours during the month including patrol at the Promenade Mall and participating in tl~e 4th of July parade. TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Howard Windsor, City Fire Chief September 17, 2001 Monthly Departmental Report RECOMMENDATION: Attached for City Councils review Monthly Activity Report for the month of August, 2001. ;ITY A'I-rORNEY II ' vvw DIRECTOR OF FINAI~CF_. ;ITY MANAGER and filing is the Fire Department's Response Statistics for AUGUST, 2001 Stmeture Fire Vegetation Fire Vehicle Fire 17 Fire Menace Standby 10 4 29 210 6 121 81 85 Fire - Other 2 4 0 Medical Aid 65 56 47 2088 Traffic Collisions 21 34 6 540 7 2 2 96 7 38 1 13 2 8 99 267 20 81 3 14 9 32 0 1 21 95 166 578 11 N/A 40 N/A Responses Outside of the City 172 Public Service 4 11 8 Hazm~ 0 1 0 N/A Ringing Alarm 28 37 9 187 TOTAL 158 165 89 N/A* Assi~ffCovers N/A 0 N/A N/A 54 32 N/A N/A · Due to changes to statistic format and items recorded, the YTI) total will not be accurate. Medic Squad 84 Response Statistics Medic Squad 84 Time Statistics Medical Aids 178 1386 Traffic Collisions 55 346 Public Service Assists 6 45 3 16 6 Fire Menace Standby's Structure Fires 55 Rinsin$Alarm 26 207 Veg~mion Fire 3 8 Vehicle Fire 1 7 Refuse Fire 2 10 Hazm~ 0 5 TOTAL 280 2085 Medic Sqdad Cancelled Prior to Patient Contact 5.3 N/A 18 N/A 77 661 Average Wait Time for AMR 4.43 N/A Medic Squad on Scene Prior to/~dVIR - Medical Aids and Traffic Collisions 120 761 PerformedI-ALS prior to AMR's Arrival 30 308 *ALS ~ Advanced Life Support Personnel 0 - Battalion Chief/Fire Marshal 3 - Fire Safety Specialist Fire Prevention 1 - Captain/Deputy Fire 3 - Fire System Inspect, Fire Plan Check St,' Marshal )rs ~tistics 1 - Office Technician III Fire Plan Check Building TI 27 185 Fire Plan Check Building Fire Plan Check Misc. FircMndcr C<~'.:.':.d Water Pl:.':. Ch~k Fire Over or Under Ground Tank Plan Check Fire Sprinkler NCOM Plan Check Fire Sprinkler TI Plan Check Fire Hood Duct Plan Check Fire Spray Booth Plan Check Fire Special Suppression Plan Check Fire Alarm Plan Check Planning Case Plan Review Fire Code Permits 28 25 11 13 16 129 212 72 5 75 75 18 3 72 172 0 6 TOTAL 139 1025 Fire Prevention (( )ntinued) Fire Inspection St~ istics Fire Prevention Final Fire Prevention Shell Fire-Underground Hydro Fire Thrust Block Fire Over Head Hydro Fire Flow Fire Flush Fire Sprinkler Final Fire Weld Inspection Fire Hood Duct Final Fire Pre- Wire Fire Alarm Final Fire Spray Booth Final Fire Safety Inspection Fire State Mandated Inspection Fire Special Events Inspection Fire Piping Hydro Fire Shear Valves Fire Over/Under Tank Final Fire Special Suppression System Fire Special Project Investigations Fire Administrative - Meetings etc... Fire Misc. Inspections 12 139 4 89 7 31 4 33 7 ! 74 1 4 2 21 11 98 3 21 5 18 1 38 I 4 87 0 3 6 74 0 13 1 27 0 1 0 2 0 5 0 1 0 0 0 N/A 2 15 1 4 71 798 Engine Co. Follow Up Enforcement TOTAL APPRO.VAL~,4/~ l CITY ATTORNEY ~ F, INANCE DIRECTOR.~.~,~____. ,ITY MANAGER ~'~/ CITY OF TEMECU!-~ AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Howard Windsor, City Fire Chief DATE: August 10, 2001 SUBJECT: Monthly Departmental Report RECOMMENDATION: Attached for City Councils review and filing is the Fire Department's Monthly Activity Report for the month of July, 2001. Response Statistics for July 2001 Structure Fke 13 14 5 Vegetation Fire 16 3 5 Vehicle Fke 5 2 1 Fke - Other 3 1 Medical Aid 55 53 Traffic Collisions 22 22 2 Fire Menace Standby 4 7 1 Public Service 4 5 4 Hazmat 0 1 0 35 34 Ringing Alarm Responses Outside of the City TOTAL 78 235 Medic Squad 84 Response Statistics 49 191 3 4 26 115 M 4 36 181 1 25 83 0 8 68 0 7 77 85 257 1821 9 55 459 4 16 82 3 16 140 1 2 N/A 19 92 640 45 198 N/A 171 712 3551 ~dic Squad 84 Time Statistics Medical Aids 177 1208 Traffic Collisions 52 291 Public Service Assists 5 39 Fire Menace Standby's 4 13 Structure Fires 5 49 Ringing Alarm 29 181 Vegetation Fire 0 5 Vehicle Fire 0 6 Refi~se Fire 0 8 Hazmat 0 5 TOTAL 263 1805 5.45 N/A Time 12 N/A Medic Sqhad Cancelled Prior to P~atient Contact 57 584 Average Wait Time for AMR [ 4.25 N/A Medic Sqhad on Scene Prior to ~ - Medical Aids and Traffic Collisions 104 641 Performed *ALS prior to AMR's A~rival 37 278 ALS - Advanced Lite Support Medic Squad Comments: On 5 occasions the Medic Squad was on scene greate~ of AMIL · Medic Squad 84 had 5 responses over ~0 ~ninutes due town. · Medic Squad 84 was out of service for 6 days this mo ' than 10 minutes before the arrival to calls being on the other side of ~th. Fire Prevention Personnel 1 - Battalion Chief/Fife Marshal 3 - Fire Safety Specialist 1 - Captain/Deputy Fir Marshal 3 - Fire System Inspectors I - Office Technician m Fire Plan Check SI distics Fire Plan Check Building TI Fire Plan Check Building Fire Plan Check Misc. 2O 12 21 158 101 187 61 Fire Under Ground Water Plan Check 10 Fire Over or Under Ground Tank Plan Check 0 5 Fke Sprinkler NCOM Plan Check 12 61 Fire Sprinkler TI Plan Check 7 66 Fire Hood Duct Plan Check 2 16 Fire Spray Booth Plan Check I 3 Fke Special Suppression Plan Check 0 0 Fire Alarm Plan Check 7 64 29 156 Planning Case Plan Review Fire Code Permits TOTAL 6 121 884 Fire Prevention (Continued) Fire Ins Statistics Fire Prevention Final Fire Prevention Shell Fire-Under~round Hydro Fire Thrust Block Fire Over Head Hydro Fire Flow Fire Flush Fire Sprinkler Final Fire Weld Inspection Fire Hood Duct Final Fire Pre- Wire Fire Alarm Final Fire Spray Booth Final Fire Safety Inspection Fire State Mandated Inspection Fire Special Events Inspection Fke Pipin8 Hydro Fire Shear Valves Fire Over/Under Tank Final Fire Special Suppression System Fire Special Project Investigations Fire Administrative -Mee{ings etc... Fire Misc. Inspections 13 126 15 85 5 24 8 29 12 67 0 3 0 19 12 87 0 18 3 12 1 37 7 83 0 3 9 68 0 13 2 26 0 1 2 2 0 5 0 1 0 0 0 N/A 2 13 0 3 91 725 Engine Co. Follow Up Enforcemem TOTAL APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR Of FINANCE CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: RECOMMENDATION: Attached for City Council's review and Works' Monthly Activity Reports for the month of July, 2001. CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer August 28, 2001 Department of Public Works Monthly Acti~ ity Report filing is the Department of Public MOACTRPT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS Monthly Activity Rep tort July / August 2001 Prepared By: Brian Ouillot Chocked by: Amer Attar Submitted by: Willi~an G. Hughes Date: August 28, 2001 PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION 1. First Street Bridge This project will construct First Street from Pujol Street to Old Tow ~ Front Street, including the construction of a bridge over Mumeta Creek and thc reahgnment of Santmgo Rogd. Contractor has fimshed the final punch list items on the street portion of the work. Construction of the EMWD lift station continues. 2. Pala Road Bridge Environmental Restoration/Median and Parkway Landscape Improvements The project installed landscape improvements along Pala Road and Cupono Lane and restored the wetlands in the construction zone. It included the installation of an irrigation sy~ and parkway work is complete. Plant establishment period and 5- 3. Pala Road Sonndwalls Work on this project includes the construction of masonry block .tern, planting, and hydroseeding. Median ear maintenance began in June. soundwalls on Pala Road from west of Rainbow Canyon Road to east of Club House Drive. The wall averages 14' in height. The sound wall is complete. Plant establishment period will end in September. 4. Murrieta Creek Crossing Between Winchester and Rancho ~ 2alifornia Road- Low-flow Cross'mg at Via Montezuma k' This project will construct a low-flow crossing of Murrieta Cree connecting Diaz and Del Rio at Via Montezuma. In addition, this project will rehabilitate the street of~ia Montezuma. This project is complete. The road was opened to thru traffic on Friday, June 15,2001. Recording a conservation easement is in progress for the mitigation of the disturbed area. 5. City Maintenance Facility Alterations, Phase III This project will modify the existing two story masonry block building to accommodate a new socond floor of office space over the existing two-story maintenance bay, including Me installation of an elevator, and two new second floor restrooms. Framing has begun and will continue. Progress is being made on the interior improvements and the new single story addition. 6. Margarita Road Widening, Panba Road to Dartolo Road This project will widen Margarita Road from Pio Pico to Dartolo Re Portola to SR 79 South. Included with this project is the pavemen! Pio Pico). The contractor has completed A.C. base coarse throughc ,ad and re-landscape the medians from De rehabilitation of Phase II (Pauba Road to ut the project. The contractor is currently R:\MonthlyActivityReport\CIP~200 B July.doc completing the landscape work in the median island. The constmcti >n portion of the project is expected to be completed in September w~th the plant maintenance period contlnueing through the end of this year. 7. Rancho California Sports Park Culvert Modification This project modifies the existing culvert in order to eliminate a slo ~e erosion problem. Construction of the project is now complete with a 90-day landscape maintenance period and minor slope modification work remaining. 8. Traffic Signal installation at Stonewood and Margarita A traffic signal will be installed at the intersection of Margarita R ~ad and Stonewood Drive. City Council awarded thc construction contract to DBX, Inc. on April 10, 2001, in the amount of $132,000. Work began August 6, 2001, and it is anticipated that the signal vnll be turned on vathm three weeks. / 9. Light Emitting Diode (LED) Traffic Signal Conversion PrOgram 1 A grant award in the amount of $140,870.00 was obtained to replase incandescent traffic signal lamps with Light Emitting Diode (LED) lamps. Under this program, all traffic ~ignal lamps in the City,of Tcmecula wil! bc replaced with thc energy efficient, long lasting LED units. All LED units (City s and Caltrans intersections) were installed prior to the California Energy Commission deadline of June 1,2001. Thc project is complete and was accepted by City Council at the August 14, 2~01 meeting. 10. Pavement Management System, Jefferson Avenue This project will rehabilitate Jefferson Avanue from the northerly City limits to Overland Drive. The work is complete with the Notice of Completion pending. 11. Senior Center Expansion The expansion will include an addition of 3000 square fcct to thc existing building. Thc expansion will be for recreational, office, and meeting purposes. A contract was awarded to R. Moody Construction on June 26 in the amount of $508,500. Expansion will include the addition ~f 3000 square feet of building area for recrcationai, office and meeting purposes. Work began July 30, 200i. Contractor completed demolislfmg patio area, excavation and rccompaction of area of addition. Work on footings and underground plumping is in progress. 12. Pavement Management System- Citywide This project will involve rehabilitating the pavement of varioas streets in the City for FY 2000-01. McLaughhn Eng~neenng and Mining Corp. was awarded a contract at the June 26 Council meeting in the amount of $2,073,000. The roads scheduled for construction are Rancho Cahfomm Road, Mira Loma Drive, La Paz Road Winchester Road (Between Diaz and Enterprise C~rcle West), Southbound Ynez Road (Between Winchester and Overland), Main Street, Enterprise Circle West (South of Winchester), and Overland Drive (Between Margarita and Ynez). The project is currently under way at the vunous locations throughout the city. 13. AC Street Repairs - FY2001 11 ha Itat ' h D dedth This project wi re bi i e and reconstruct selected City streets. Cunning am avis was awar e contract at the June 26 Council meeting in the amount of $117,000. The roads scheduled for construction are 2 R:\MonthlyActivityReport\CIP~200BJuly.doc Margarita Road at Avenida Cima Del Sol, Jefferson Avenue at Del Rio, Overland Drive at Commerce Center, Enterprise Circle West at Rider Way, and Diaz Road at Rancho Wa The project is currently under way at the various locations throughout the city. 14. Chaparral High School Swimming Pool A 25-yard x 25-meter pool will be built at Chaparral High Scl~ 31. The facility will include a smaller recreation pool component and a bathhouse with locker room faciliti~, restrooms and showers Spray-type play eqmpment wall be ~ncluded as an element m the base construction b~d. The Noiace to Proceed was ~ssued for August 13, 2001, and work is expected to be completed by ~arch 2002. The contractor, California Commercial Pools, is preparing the site and relocating the utilities 15. Starlight Ridge Southern Cross Road Sidewalk Project This Project will install approximately one half mile of sidewalk al ~ the northwest side of Southern Cross Road. Final design is complete. Elite Bobcat Service, Inc. was awarded the contract at the July 24 Council meetingintheamountof$51,790. Pre-construction meeting was held August 13,2001. The work is expected to be completed by the end of September. 16. Street Name Sign Replacement This project will entail removing the existing wooden signs in the plastic signs selected by the Public Traffic Safety Commission. The will start installing the new signs shortly. PROJECTS BEING ADVERTII NONE La Serena area and replacing them with ns have been purchased and City forces FOR BIDS PROJECTS IN DESIGN 1. Pala Road Improvements - Phase II (79 South to Pechan This project will widen Pala Road to its ultimate width from the check comments (70% Submittal) were returned to the consultant the design. The approval of Wolf Creek Drainage Basin Stud because hydrology studies upstream of Wolf Creek require prior: be using an appraiser to assist in the preparation of the real estate for design only at this time. 2. Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Over Murrieta This project will widen Rancho California Bridge over Murrieta lanes. Consultant is investigating potential lateral spreading and 90% drawings will be submitted shortly after that. t Road) da Road Bridge to Pechanga road. Plan Work is proceeding on the remainder of by RCFC & WCD has been delayed pproval from RCFC & WCD. Staffwill appraisal report. The project is funded Creek Creek to provide four additional traffic s~our and ways to mitigate these impacts. 3 R:\MonthlyActivityRcport\ClP~2001 ~luly.doc 3. Temecula Library A full service library, approximately 34,000 square feet in area, will~ be designed and built on Pauba Road, just west Of Fire Station #84. This project will provide the commufiity with library resources and services. The design is progressing on schedule. Utility services construction~ is being coordinated with Pauba Road, · Phase II project. Comments on the plans by City staff were returned to the consultant. The architect is working on the final drawings. . 4. Pauba Road Improvements - Phase II {1Vlargnrlta Road to [Showalter Road) This project will widen Pauba Road from Showalter to just west of Margarita Road to its ultimate width. The project is in design and the work is being coordinated with design of the library project. All utility issues are being addressed. 90 ¼ design plans were submitted to the C~ty for rewew. Plans and specs were rexaewed by staff and will be returned to Consultant for completion of final design plans. $. Mnrrieta Creek Bridge - Overland Drive Extension to Diaz This project will entail alignment studies and the design of an extension of Overland Drive, westerly to Diaz Road which ~ncludes a new bridge over Murneta Creek. The project includes the w~denmg of Overland Drive from Jefferson Avenue to Commerce Center Drive, and the extension of Overland Drive across Mumeta Creek to Diaz Road. Project Design Consultant (PDC), the designer, has c~mpleted the alignment study and staff is currantly reviewing the document. 6. 1-15 Northbonnd On-Ramp Widening at Winchester R~ad This project will re-stripe westbound Winchester Road from Ynez Road to I-15 northbound on-ramp to allow for a better flow of traffic. The C~ty apphed for an Encroachment Perrmt from Caltrans to do the striping and comments were received. The consultant is addressing Caltrans ~comments. Plans will be resubmitted to Callrans the week of July 16, and the permit should be issued any day now. 7. New Temecnla Sports Complex A new 40+ Acres sports complex will be built on Pala Road at WolI~Valley. On May 22, 2001, a meeting was held to review the preliminary design resulting from the Workshop. Staff gave additional input during this meeting. A soils report was completed and forwarded to the City. The consultant, RJM Design is finishing up the preliminary master plan of the sports complex. Staff visited other parks in southern California. 8. Diaz Road Realignment Under this projcct, Diaz Road will be realigned to Vincent Moraga ~oad at Rancho California Road. Business Park Drive will be a T-intersection at Diaz. In response to additional design cost requests by the designer, City staff has elected to complete thc design in-house. Anttc~pated design completion ~s scheduled for September 2001. 9. Rancho California Road Median Modifications at Town Center I f The project will include the closing of the two median openings op Rancho California Road in front o the Town Center, while lengthening the left turn lanes at Ynez Road, TOwn Center Drive, and Via Los Colinas to ~mprove Waffle c~rculat~on. The design ~s 90 % complete wtth the exception of the landscapmg. Landscapmg 4 R:\MonflfiyActivityReport\CIPL2001 kluly.doc design is currently at 50% completion. 10. Rancho California Road Widening at Ynez Road (Add ril ~t turn lane to westbound lanes) This project will add a fight turn lane on westbound Rancho California Road at Ynez Road. Right of way acquisition at thc northeast comer of Rancho California and Ynez will be required. In-house design is 90% complete. 11. Landscaping and Sidewalk On 79 South (Front Street to ~ ala Road) The project consists of the design and construction of new sidewa~lk, landscaping, and irrigation along the south side of State Highway 79 South between Pala Road and Old q own Front Street. A design consultant has been selected and a professional services contract will be awarde~ ~ when a funding agreement between thc County and City is finalized. 12. Alignment Study for Murrieta Creek Bridge Between Winchester Road and Temecula's City Limits and Diaz Road Extension This study will determine thc alignment and location of thc Murrict~ Creek crossing between Winchester Road to the northern City Limits. In addition, the study will bc combined with the Diaz Road Extension alignment study and design. Coordination w~th the C~ty of Murneta, Flood Control and Army Corps of Engineers ~s necessary. Staffawarded the contract to K~mley-Horn and Assocmtes on March 27, 2001 councd meeting. The study is currently underway. PROJECTS THAT ARE SUSPENI ,ED OR ON-HOLD 1. Margarita Road/Winchester Road Intersection Improvements Project is on hold. Under this project, an additional left turn fram eastbound Winchester to northbound Margarita will be added in order to accommodate increasing traffic volumes. Design is 50% complete. Project will require a Caltrans encroachment permit. 2. Pujol Street Sidewalk Improvements - Phase II This project will complete the knuckle at the intersection of Sixth ~ treet and Felix Valdez. The project is on hold. 3. Winchester Road Widening Between Enterprise Circle ~m I Jefferson This project will add a right turn lane from Eastbound WincheSter to Southbound Jefferson, starting at Enterprise Circle. O'Malley Engineering Corporation has provided Ithe design survey data. Project is on hold. 4. Traffic Signals Design at Pala Road and Loma Linda, and at Pala Road and Wolf Valley Two new traffic signals will be installed on Pala Road, one at Loma Linda and the other at WolffYalley. The plans and specifications are complete. The project is being c~ordinated with Pechanga Development 5 R:\Mon~lyActivityReport\CIP\2001 x July.doc Corporation sewer project. This project is on hold due to environmental constraints. 5. Pala Road Interim Improvements - (Widening to accommod ate four lanes from Loma Linda Bridge to Wolf Valley) Pala Road Interim Improvements (58 feet in width) will be complet :d with the second phase of construction of the Pala Road Trunk Sewer (Pechanga Development Corporatior project). An encroachment permit was issued for the construction of the trunk sewer and the interim street tmprovements. Traffic signal and striping plans are complete. The construction of Pala Road Trunk Sewer (P~ase Two) by the Pechanga Development Corporation from Clubhouse Drive to the new Pechanga Casino Driveway (600 feet southeast of Wolf Valley Road) started November 6, 2000 and the approximate completion date ~s Spnng 2001. The internn project is on hold due to environmental constraints. R d 6. Santa Gertrudis Bridge Widening at 1-15 This is Phase Ii of the Southbound Auxiliary Lane project at the southbound exit ramp for Winchester oa · I This project will widen the 1-15 southbound emt-ramp at the Santa Gertrudis Creek Bridge to provide an additional lane on the exit ramp.~ust north of Winchester Road. St~ff m revisiting the merits ofth~s project m light of the proposed Project Study Report for Cherry Street Interchange. The study shows that this bridge may have to be removed in the future to accommodate the Cherry Street Interchange. This project is suspended indefinitely. 7. Santiago Road/Ynez Road Intersection Improvements This project will widen, realign, and adjust the traffic signal timinl of the existing intersection. This project has been delayed indefinitely. The Traffic Division completed some minor striping and signal adjustments that improved traffic movement through the intersection. 6 R:\MonthlyActivityReport\CIP~.001 ~luly.doc wO m fl.. -I wO 1 o~ o~ MEMORANDUM TO: Bill Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engin FROM: ~?q~ Brad Buron, Maintenance Superintendent BATE: August 3, 2001 SUBJECT: Monthly Activity Report - July, 2001 The following activities were performed by Public Works Department, personnel for the month of July, 2001: f. SIGNS A. B. C. Total signs replaced Total signs installed Total signs repaired I1. TREES A. Total trees tdmmed for sight distance and street sv II1. ASPHALT REPAIRS A. Total square feet of A. C. repairs B. Total Tons IV. CATCH BASINS A. Total catch basins cleaned RIGHT-OF-WAY WEED ABATEMENT A. Total square footage for right-of-way abatement VI. GRAFFITI REMOVAL A. Total locations B. Total S.F. VII. STENCILING A. 286 New and repainted legends B. 3~377 L.F. of new and repainted md curb and striping Street Maintenance Division in-house 91 77 3 ~eping concerns 16 1,600 26 22 631900 15 1,058 Also City Maintenance staff responded to 60 service order reques ranging from weed abatement, tree trimming, sign repair, A.C. failures, litter removal, and catch basin cleanings. Th s s compared to 35 service order requests for the month of June, 2001. The Maintenance Crew has also put in 127 hours of overtime whicl i includes standby time, special events and response to street emergencies. The total cost for Street Maintenance performed by Contractor for the month of Jul¥~ 2001 was $ 31,430.00 compared to $ 8~708.00 forthe month of June, 200t. Account No. 5402 $ 31,340.00 Account No. 5401 $ - 0 - Account No. 999-5402 $ - 0 - Ron Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works Ali Moghadam, Senior Engineer - (CIP/Traffic) Greg Butler, Senior Engineer (Capital Improvements Amer Attar, Senior Engineer (Capital Improvements Jen¥ Alegria, Senior Engineer - (Land Development) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 0