HomeMy WebLinkAbout090501 PC Agenda , i -~ n com liance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you heed special assistance to partici~
~ .~--~,-~-~' "'P ~- .... "--.-~'~ "f the Ci~v C-lerk (909) 694-64~ 4. Notification 48 ho~rs prior to a me...e~ng...~w~ I
~ll~tih~,~P~ease~conzac'[,mu u,,,,.= ,, ~:~.~ .'~;~,~ ~re acCessibility to 'that meeting [28 CFR I
~ ~= ' "'~it to make reason~bl~ :§~i~eh~nt~_to en
35' 02.3 :.to D Titte,]
^GENOA
TEMECULA PLANNING Cm ,SS ON
REGULAR MEETING
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
43200 BUSINESS PARK DiRIVE
SEPTEMBER 5, 200t - 6:00 P.M.
CALL TO ORDER:
Flag Salute:
Roil Call:
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Commissioner Telesio
Guerriero, Mathewson, Olhass
Next in Order:
Resolution: No. 2001-031
3, Telesio, and Chiniaeff
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the ublic may address the Commission
on items that are listed on the Agendal Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes each.
If you desire to speak to the Commission about a~n item not on the Agenda, a pink
"Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filld with the'Commission Secretary.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
'For all other agenda terns a "Request to Speak" for.m. ,m.ust be_.filed wlth._the
Commission Secretary prior to the Commission addressing mat item. /here is a mree
(3) minute time limit for individual speakers.
CONSENT CALENDAR
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC.
isted under:consent Calendar are censidered to be routine and all will
All matters I ..... 7'--_ .... -- on
be enacted by one roll call vote.- There w~ be no (~scuss of these items unless
Members of the Planning commissibn request .' )ecific items be removed from the
Consent Calendar for separate action.
1 Aqenda
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the Agenda of September 5, 2001
2 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve the Minutes of July 18, 2001
COMMISSION BUSINESS
PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before a public
hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of
the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you
may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public
hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the Commission Secretary at, or
prior to, the public hearing.
3 Planninq Application No. PA00-0448 (Development Plan) - Davcon Development
Matthew Harris, Associate Planner
RECOMMENDATION
3.1 Adopt a Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. PA00~0448 pursuant to
Section 15332 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines;
3.2 Adopt a Resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2001-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. 00-0448 - A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE DESIGN AND
CONSTRUCTION OF TWO ADJOINING COMMERCIAL/OFFICE
BUILDINGS ON TWO SEPARATE LOTS WITH THE BUILDING
ON LOT 3 TOTALING 35,400 SQUARE FEET ON 1.$6 ACRES,
AND THE BUILDING ON LOT 4 TOTALING 35,400 SQUARE
FEET ON 1.7t ACRES, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF
MADISON AVENUE WHERE MADISON AVENUE "T"
INTERSECTS WITH SANBORN ROAD, KNOWN AS
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO'S. 910-272-005 (LOT 3) & 910-272-
006 (LOT 4).
R:~PLANCOMM~Agendas~20OI~9-5-O 1 .doc
2
Rolfe :Pmisendanz ::ASS s~a'tit~P~Tanher
RECOMMENDATIQN
4.1 Ad~pt a NotiCefofl E2×~rfilS:tion~fo~;Pl~ing APPlicatiOn
Sec{ion i 53~'~-0~'-~l~ecaliforni~:En~h~ental Qualit
4:2 Adopt a Res01utibn Entitled: : -' - '~- '
"-~pc RESOLUTION NO. 01- ~ _.~..
A RESOL~'UTION OF-THE P~ANNING COY, MISSION OF THE
ClTM OF TEMEcULA ~APPi~OVi'NGPLANNING APPLICATION
NO._ 0~i..0~I87,~A~..':I~[E~_~MENT PL.~.N 'TO DESIGN,
CONSTRUCT~AND'OPER~E A-- 55,697f SQUARE FOOT
EXEC~I?~E~i'0~:~[~E-_B~iNG FOR iINLAND VALLEY
TERR~C~I~I~V'~-$TMEN~-~I~OUP, LLC..~1~ '3;:24 VACANT
ACRES~-WIT~iN.WESTSIDE~U~SINESS .CE~ITRE, A PORTION
OF PAR-C~'-I~OF PARCE[~I~i~AP.28084-A,ND PARCEL 4 OF
TENTA~IVEMAPL284~3. _GENERALLY L~CATED EAST OF
THE ~EST~N:~B~PASS J.~' SQUTH~'~F ROICK DRIVE,
KNOWN AS .ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 909:320~048
COMMISSIONER'S REPORTS ' _' :~'
PLANNING DIRECTOR'S~REPORT
No. PA01-01871 pursuant to
Act Guidelines;
Next Regular MeetingL S~'ptem~be~ 19 20'01. Council
' Temecula, CA.-;~92590 '
:hambers, 43200 Business Park Drive
ITEM #2
MINUTES FOR JULY t8, 2001 '1
WILL BE PROVIDED UNDER SEPAIRATE COVER
ITEM #3
RECOMMENDATION:
STAFF REPORT- PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECUL~,~
PLANNING COMMISSION
September 5, 2001
Planning Application No. 00-0448
(Development Pla~)
Prepared By: Matthew Harris, Associate Planner
The Community Developme,nt Department - Planning Division Staff
recommends the Planning Commission:
ADOPT a Notice of Exemption for Plannin
0448 pursuant to Section 15332 of the
Quality Act Guidelines.
ADOPT a Resolution entitled:
Application No. PA00-
;alifornia Environmental
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2001-,__
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNINGIAPPLICATION NO. 00-
0448 - A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOI~I THE DESIGN AND
CONSTRUCTION OF TWO ADJOINING COMMERCIAL/OFFICE
BUILDINGS ON TWO SEPARATE LOTS WITH THE BUILDING ON
LOT 3 TOTALING 35,400 SQUARE FEET ON 1.66 ACRES, AND
THE BUILDING ON LOT 4 TOTALING 35,~400 SQUARE FEET ON
1.71 ACRES, LOCATED ON THE EAS,T SIDE OF MADISON
AVENUE WHERE MADISON AVENUE "T" INTERSECTS WITH
SANBORN ROAD, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO'S. 910-
272-005 (LOT 3) & 910-272-006 (LOT 4).
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
PROPOSAL:
LOCATION:
Davcon DevelopmEnt Inc., c/o David Wakefield 42389
Winchester Rd., Ste! B, Temecula, CA 92590
I lift e
The design and c?nstruction of two commerc~a o ic
buildings on two separate lots with the building on Lot 3
totaling 35,400 square feet on 1.66 acres, and the building on
Lot 4 totaling 35,400 square feet on 1.71 acres.
On the east side of Madison Avenue where Madison Avenue
"T" intersects with S~nborn Road [APN 910-272-005 (Lot 3) &
910-272-006 (Lot 4)2.
R:~D P~2000~00-0448 Etco~Staff reporl 2.doc
1
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION:
EXISTING ZONING:
SURROUNDING ZONING:
EXISTING LAND USE:
SURROUNDING LAND USES:
PROJECT STATISTICS
Lot 3:
Total Area:
Total Building Area:
First Floor/Building Footprints:
Second Floor:
Third Floor
Hardscape:
Landscape Area:
Paved Area:
Parking Required:
Lot 4:
Parking Provided:
Total Area:
Total Building Area:
First Floor/Building Footprints:
Second Floor:
Third Floor
Hardscape:
Landscape Area:
Paved Area:
Parking Required:
Parking Provided:
SC (Service Commercial)
SC (Service Commercial)
North:
South:
East:
West:
SC (Service Commercial)
SC (Service Commercial)
SC (Service Commercial)
SC (Service Commercial)
Vacant
North: Commercial Businesses
South: Commercial Building under construction
East: Interstate 15
West: Vacant
72,310 square feet
35,400 square feet
14,600 square feet
14,600 square feet
6,200
6,872 square feet
20,065 square feet
29,293 square feet
Service Commercial (1:500)
Office (1:300)
1.66 acres
0.49 FAR
20.2%
9.5%
27.7%
40.5%
25 spaces
53 spaces
78 spaces
89 spaces
74,488 square feet
35,400 square feet
14,600 square feet
14,600 square feet
6,200
6,705 square feet
19,381 square feet
32,322 square feet
Service Commercial (1:500)
Office (1:300)
1.71 acres
0.48 FAR
19.6%
9.0%
26.0%
43.4%
25 spaces
53 spaces
78 spaces
89 spaces
BACKGROUND
On March 28, 2001 the Planning Commission considered a Development Plan to construct and
operate two adjoining two-story commercial buildings totaling 29,186 square feet each on the
subject site. Given the proximity of the site to Interstate 15 and its high level of visibility from the
R:~D P~2OO0'~00-O448 Etco~Stafl report 2.doc
2
freeway, the Commission concluded that the site warranted a development with significant
architectural and landscaping enhancements. The Commission felt that the buildings, as proposed,
lacked significant articulation and prowded the appearance of a long rectangular building. It was
requested that the face of the buildings be broken up further and that addlhonal features be added
so as to prowde wsual interest. Subsequently the Commission moved to continue the item off
ca endar m order for staff to work w~th the apphcant to enhance the des gn of the fac I ty.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Since being continued, the applicant, property owner and, p. roject architect have collaborated to
completely redesign the project. The applicant is now propqslng a Development Plan to design and
construct two, three-story commercial/office buildings on th,'e lots with each building having 35,400
square feet of floor area. The first floor of each building is intended for "big box users" such as
appliance, carpet, and furniture showrooms. The second and third floors will accommodate off~ce
space.
ANALYSIS
Site Desi,qn and Circulation
As viewed from the freeway and Madison Avenue, the site ;~nd the two buildings will appear as one
integrated project, but with an approximately forty foot sepaiation from the common interior property
ne Access to the site is from Madison Avenue, wth a dr Veway located on each end of the s te
The northern driveway has shared access with the existing adjacent commercial building. The
buildings are ~n the center of the s~te, which allows circulation around the buildings w~th parking on
all four sides. The ons~te parking areas on the east and west s~des of the buildings will be buffered
from Interstate 15 and the Madison Avenue frontage by a twenty-five foot w~de and s~xteen foot w~de
landscape strip respectively.
Staff believes that the overall site design and circulatioh are in conformance with the City's
commercial design gu~dehnes. The proposed development respects the s~te settings of ex,sting
properties ~n the ~mmedlate area through the use of s~m~lar setbacks and building arrangements.
Shared access ~s achieved with the adjacent property to the north. Parking areas are separated from
buildings by both s~dewalks and landscaping strips. Sufficient spacing has been prowded between
driveways and street ~ntersect~ons. In addition, ons~te loading areas are separated from ma~n
customer paths and d~sabled parking spaces are located so as to prohibit crossing of parking ~sles.
Architecture & Colors
The proposed buildings will be constructed of tilt-up concrete with matching architectural design.
The buildings will appear adjo~ned by way of a central extene, r courtyard, waterscape and decorative
column structures. Numerous diamond shaped patterns wi!l be scored into the concrete walls and
painted to provide the appearance of further relief on all four sides of the buildings. Exterior
balconies will be provided on some elevations.
The two building base colors will consist of off white and light tan Three accent colors will be utilized
to h~ghhght w~ndows, balcomes, roof cormces and the d~amond shaped etchings. A patina green
corrugated metal roof is proposed. The windows will ha~,e a light bronze glazing with copper
anodized aluminum framing.
Unlike the previously proposed buildings, significant horizontal and vertical wall articulation has been
accomplished with a variety ' ' '
of ~nsets, pop-outs and w~ng walls. Multi-planed roof pitches are now
R:~D P~.000~0-0448 Etco~Staff report 2.doc
3
utilized. These improvements have served to ensure that the buildings no longer have a long box-
like appearance. In addition, a variety of amhitectural enhancements including pronounced building
entrances, balconies, central courtyard, building colors and window variation all serve to achieve the
visual interest lacking from the originally proposed buildings.
So as to eliminate the appearance of flat building faces, staff recommends that all windows be
recessed a minimum of 6 inches from the building face (see Condition of Approval No. 10).
Overall, staff believes the complete redesign of the buildings has resulted in a significantly improved
project. Moreover, staff feels the buildings now achieve the spirit and intent of the City's adopted
design guidelines for commercial/office buildings.
Landscapinq
As required by Code, at least 20 percent of each parcel, excluding the right-of-way, must be
landscaped. The preliminary landscaping plan indicates that 28 percent of Lot 3 will be landscaped.
and 26 percent of Lot 4 will be landscaped. The largest percentage of landscaping will be along the
street and freeway frontages.
The streetscape along Madison Avenue was installed a number of years ago in conjunction with the
development of the business park. The dominant street trees here are a tightly placed row of palm
trees with Chinese Pistache in groupings at each end of the palm row. There is an existing row of
shrubs running parallel to Madison Avenue, behind the trees, which will provide immediate
screening of the parking lot for this project. Fifteen gallon Fern Pines are proposed throughout the
off-street parking area. Proposed landscaping around the perimeter of the buildings features a
mixture of 24" boxed red Crepe Myrtle, fifteen gallon Fern Pine, 10' clear trunk Queen Palm and 24"
boxed Canary Island Pine. Moreover, Queen Palms and Crepe Myrtles will be clustered at the main
building entrances and associated central courtyard. A mixture of shrubs and flowering plants will be
provided throughout the site. Along the freeway frontage is an existing row of eucalyptus trees that
will be complimented with Escallonia to screen the parking spaces, yet maintain some freeway
visibility.
Overall, staff believes that the proposed onsite landscaping compliments both the design of the
site and buildings. However, both staff and the City's landscape arcl~itect recommend that larger
palms (i.e. 20' clear trunk) and pines (i.e. 36" box) be provided at the main entrances of the
buildings, focal points and building corners in order to achieve a more immediate scale with the
building masses (see Condition of Approval No. 20). In addition, for purposes of consistency,
staff recommends that the existing double offset rows of eucalyptus trees along the Interstate 15
frontage be extended across the entire length of the eastern property line (see Condition of
Approval No. 21)
Parkinq Analysis
Based on the City's parking standards for service commercial (one space per 500 square feet) and
office uses (one space per 300 square feet), a minimum of 78 parking spaces must be provided for
each lot according to the floor area. Each building will have 89 parking spaces on their respective
lots. With the modest increase over the required number of parking stalls, staff is confident that the
site is adequately parked for the intended uses.
Minor Exceptions and FAR
The total square footage of this building, based on the outside dimensions, results in a gross floor
area ratio (FAR) of approximately .50 for each lot, while th
ratio of .30 FAR.
As provided by Section 17.08.050, the FAR can be as high.
the FAR are offered. To be eligible for an increase in FAR,
the following criteria:
Development Code specifies a target
is 1.5 if certain incentives for increasing
the applicant must meet at least one of
1. The project includes use(s) which provide outstanding and exceptional benefits to the city
with respect to the emp oyment, flsca, social and economic needs of the community.
2. The project prowdes exceptional architectural and landscape des gn amen t es, wh ch reflect
an attractive image and character for the city. I
3. The project provides enhanced public facilities that are needed by the city, beyond those
required mitigation impact measures.
Staff believes the redesigned project meets both the secon, J and third criteria. The development will
incorporate significant architectural design and landscaped entry features resulting in an attractive
~mage and character. Moreover, the project ~mproves c~rculat~on by ~ts proposal for a reciprocal use
driveway with the adjacent property to the north.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
Staff has reviewed the project for compliance with the Califdrnia Environmental Quality Act. Based
upon staff's review, the proposed project is eligible for a CEQA exemption pursuant to Section
15332 of the CEQA Guidelines based on the following reasons:
/
· The site is 3.37 acres, which is less than the 5 acres re, lquired.
· The proposed development is consistent with the existing development in the area.
· The s~te has no value as a habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species.
· The s~te w~ll be adequately served by public utilities and services.
· The buildings are being approved pursuant to the zoning and general plan designations for the
site.
EXISTING ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION
The General Plan Land Use designation for the site is Service Commercial (SC). Existing zoning
for the site is SC (Service Commercial). A wide variety of commercial uses are permitted within this
zone, w~th the approval of a Development Plan pursuant ~to Chapter 17.05 of the Development
Code. The project as proposed, meets all minimum stahdards of, and is consistent with, the
General Plan, Development Code and the Design Guidelin~es.
SUMMARWCONCLU$1ONS
The project has been determined by staff to be generally consistent with applicable City policies,
standards and gu~dehnes. We beheve, the redesigned project represents a s~gn~flcant ~mprovement
from the ong~nally proposed development and will represent an aesthetic addition to the Citys
service commercial area. ~
FINDINGS - DEVELOPMENT PLAN
1. The proposal, two commercial buildings, is consi tent with the land use policies of the
Service Commercial (SC) land use designation standards of the City of Temecula General
Plan, as well as the development standards for Service Commercial (SC) contained in the
R:~D P~.000',00~48 Etco~Staff report 2.doc
5
City's Development Code. The site is properly planned and zoned, and as conditioned, is
physically suitable for the type and density of commercial development proposed. The
project, as conditioned, is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law
and local ordinances, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City
Wide Design Guidelines, Ordinance No. 655 (Mt. Palomar Lighting Ordinance), the City's
Water Efficient Landscaping provisions, and fire and building codes.
The overall design of the project, including the site, building, parking, circulation and other
associated site improvements, is consistent with, and intended to protect the health and
safety of those working in and around the site. The project has been reviewed for, and as
conditioned, has been found to be consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines,
standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and
function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety and welfare.
The project meets the requirements of Section 17.08.050.A.2 & 3 of the Temecula
Development Code. The project, as proposed, provides exceptional architectural amenities
and common parking facilities.
Attachments:
1.
2.
PC Resolution - Blue Page 7
Exhibit A. Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 11
Exhibits - Blue Page 23
A. Vicinity Map
B. Zoning Map
C. General Plan
D. Site Plan
E. Elevation
F. Landscape Plan
R:'~) P'~2000~00-0448, Etco~Staff report 2.doc
6
ATTACHMENT NO.
PC RESOLUTION NO. 01-
R:~D P~000~00-0448 Etco~Staff report 2.doc
PC RESOLUTION NO 01-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
APPROVING PLANNINGIAPPLICATION NO. 00-
OF
TEMECULA
0448 - A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOI~ THE DESIGN AND
CONSTRUCTION OF TWO COMMERCIAL/OFFICE BUILDINGS
ON TWO SEPARATE LOTS WITH THE BUILDING ON LOT 3
TOTALING 35,400 SQUARE FEET ON 1,.66 ACRES, AND THE
BUILDING ON LOT 4 TOTALING 35,400 S, QUARE FEET ON 1.71
ACRES, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE ,OF MADISON AVENUE
WHERE MADISON AVENUE "T" INTERSECTS WITH SANBORN
ROAD, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARdEL NO'S. 910-272-005
(LOT 3) & 910-272-006 (LOT 4).
WHEREAS, Davcon Development Inc., filed Pla;nning Application No. 00-0448, (the
"Application") in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development
Code;
WHEREAS, the Application was processed includin, g, but not limited to pubtic notice, in the
time and manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered ~e Application on September 5, 2001, at
a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested
persons had an opportunity to, and did testify ' ' ' ' '
e~ther m support or oppos~t;on to this matter;
tth I ' fth ~ ' ' hi .
WHEREAS, a e conc us~on o e L, omm~ss~on eanng and after due consideration of the
testimony, the Commission approved the Application subj,~ct to and based upon the findings set
forth hereunder;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES
RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by
reference.
Section 2. Findinqs. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby makes
the following hnd~ngs as required by Section 17.05.010.F of the Temecula Mumclpal Code:
A Th I tw ff I I
· e proposa, o commercial/o ice bui dings, is consistent with the and use policies
of the Serv;ce Commercial (SC) land use des~gnabon standards of the C;ty of Temecula General
Plan, as well as the development standards for Service Commerc;al (SC) contained ~n the C~tys
Development Code. The site is properly planned and zoned, and as conditioned, is physically
suitable for the type and density of commerc;al development proposed. The project, as conditioned,
~s also consistent w~th other apphcable requ;rements of State law and local ordinances, including the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City Widg Design Guidelines, Ordinance No. 655
(Mt. Palomar Lighting Ordinance), the City's Water ' ' ~ '
Efficient Landscap;ng provisions, and fire and
building codes.
B. The overall design of the project, including thee site, building, parking, circulation and
other associated site improvements, is consistent with, and intended to protect the health and safety
been rewewed for, and as conditioned, has
of those working in and around the site. The project has ' '
R:~D P~000'~0-0448 Etco',Staff report 2.doc
8
been found to be consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations
intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent
with the public health, safety and welfare.
C. The project meets the requirements of Section 17.08.050.A.2 & 3 of the Temecula
Development Code. The project, as proposed, provides exceptional architectural amenities and
common parking facilities.
Section 3. Environmental Compliance. A Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. 00-
0448 was made per the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15332 (In-Fill
Development Projects, Class 32). This project is an in-fill development and it meets the following
criteria:
· The sites total 2.09 acres, which is less than the 5 acres required.
· The proposed development is consistent with the existing development in the area.
· The site has no value as a habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species.
· The site will be adequately served by public utilities and services.
· The buildings are being approved pursuant to the zoning and general plan
designations for the site.
Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby
conditionally approves Planning Application No. 00-0448 for a Development Plan to build two
commercial/office buildings on two separate lots with the building on Lot 3 totaling 35,400 square
feet on 1.66 acres, and the building on Lot 4 totaling 35,400 square feet on 1.71 acres on the east
side of Madison Avenue where Madison Avenue 'q'" intersects with Sanborn Road, and known as
Assessor Parcel No's. 910-272-005 (Lot 3) & 910-272-006 (Lot 4). The Conditions of Approval are
contained in Exhibit A.
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning
Commission this 5t~ day of September 2001.
A'I-rEST:
Dennis Chiniaeff, Chairperson
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
{SEAL}
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA
I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that
PC Resolution No. 01 -. was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City
of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 5th day of September, 2001, by the following
vote:
R:'~D p~2000~00-0448 Etco~Staff repot12.doc
9
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
R:",D P'2000~0-0448 Etco~Staff report 2.doc
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
10
EXHIBIT A
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
DEVELOPMENT PL/~N
R:~D P~2.000~00-0448 EtcoLStaff reporl 2.doc
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF TEMECUL ~,
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No. 00-0448 (Development Plan)
t t'
Project Description: The design and co.s ruc ,on of two commercial/office
bu,ldlngs on two se~parate lots with the building on Lot 3
totaling 35,400 sq,uare feet on 1.66 acres, and the
building on Lot 4 ~otaling 35,400 square feet on 1.71
acres, located on th[e east side of Madison Avenue where
Madison Avenue "l intersects with Sanborn Road·
DIF Category: Service Commerci;
Assessor Parcel No.: 910-272-005 (Lot 3) & 910-272-006 (Lot 4)
Approval Date: September 5, 2001
Expiration Date: September 5, 2003
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this roject
1. The applicant shall deliver to the Community Develop,ment Department - Planning Division a
cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of seventy-
eight Dollars ($78.00) for the County administrative fee,', to enable the City to file the Notice of
Exemption as provided under Public Resources Code S, ection 21108(b) and California Code of
Regulations Section 15062. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant has not
delivered to the Community Development Department - Planning Division the check as required
above, the approva for the project granted sha be vo bi by reason of fa ure of condition (Fish
and Game Code Section 711.4(c).
General Requirements
2. The permittee/applicant shall indemnify, protect and hold harmless, the City and any agency or
~nstrumentahty thereof, and/or any of ts off cers, employees, and agents from any and all claims,
actions, or proceedings against the City or any agency or ~nstrumentahty thereof or any of ~ts
officers, employees, and agents, to attack, set aside, void, annul, or seek monetary damages
resulting from an approval of the C~ty, or any agency or ~nstrumental~ty thereof, adwsory agency,
appeal board or leg;slat;ve body ~nclud~ng acbons approved by the voters of the C~ty, concerning
the Planning Apphcat~on which act;on ~s brought w~th~n the appropnate statute of I~m~tat~ons
period and Public Resources Code, Division 13, Chapte, r 4 (Section 21000 et seq., including but
not by the way of limitations Section 21152 and 21167). The City shall promptly notify the
perm~ttee/appl~cant of any claim, action, or proceeding brought forth w~th~n th;s hme penod. The
C~ty shall estimate the cost of the defense of the acbon and applicant shall depos;t sa~d amount
with the City. City may require additional deposits to cover anbc~pated costs. City shall refund,
without interest, any unused portions of the deposit once the litigation is finally concluded.
Should the City fail to either promptly notify or cooper'ate fully, permittee/applicant shall not,
thereafter be responsible to indemnify,
R:~D P~000~00-0448 Etco~Staff repod 2.doc
12
defend, protect, or hold harmless the City, any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its
officers, employees, or agents. Should the applicant fail to timely post the required deposit,
the Director may terminate the land use approval without further notice to the applicant.
3. This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall
become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction
contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period which is thereafter diligently
pursued to completion or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this
approval.
4. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibit "D"
(Site Plan), contained on file with the Community Development Department - Planning
Division. Additionally, the following criteria must be met prior to development of the project:
a. Ail ground mounted utility/mechanical equipment shall be located such that they are
not placed in prominent locations visible to the public.
b. Provide the Planning Department with a copy of the underground water plans and
electrical plans for verification of acceptable placement of the transformer and the
double detector check prior to final agreement with the utility companies.
5. Any outside wall-mounted lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly
upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way. Details of these lights shall be submitted to
the Planning Department during plan check for review prior to installation. The installation of
wall pack style light shall not be used along the street or freeway side elevations.
6. All parking lot lights and other exterior lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted
to the Department of Building and Safety for plan check approval and shall comply with the
requirements of Riverside County Ordinance No. 655.
7. Building elevations shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibit "E" (Building
Elevations), contained on file with the Community Development Department - Planning
Division.
a. All mechanical and roof-mounted equipment shall be hidden by building elements
that were designed for that purpose as an integral part of the building. When
determined to be necessary by the Director of Planning, the parapet will be raised to
provide for this screening.
8. Landscaping shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibit "F" (Landscape Plan).
Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable
satisfaction of the Director of Planning, If it is determined that the landscaping is not being
maintained, the Director of Planning shall have the authority to require the property owner to
bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued
maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any
successors in interest. Additionally, the following criteria must be met prior to development of
the project:
9. The colors and materials for this project shall substantially conform to the following list of
approved colors and materials and with the Color and Material Board contained on file with
the Community Development Department - Planning Division. Any deviation from the
approved colors and materials shall require approval of the Director of Planning.
R:',D p'~2.000'~00-O448 Etco~Stafl report 2.doc
13
Material
Windows, doors
Wall face vertical elements
Wall face horizontal elements
Accents
10. All windows shall be recessed a minimum of six (6) in!hes
Finish & Color
Copper anodized frames w/light bronze glazing
Loggia, Frazee 8730W (off white)
Frontier Tan, Frazee 8732W (light tan)
Toasted Tan, Frazee 7783N (tan)
Bark Mulch, Frazee 8734M (Clay)
W d Country, Frazee 8735D (Raw Umber
from the building face.
Prior to the Issuance of Grading Permits
11. The Developer shall submit a Lot Line Adjustment al 31ication to move the lot line between
Lots 3 and 4 as shown on the approved site plan.
12. Two copies of a Phase I archaeological report shall be ;ubmitted for review and approval by the
Planning Department. Any recommendations contained m that report shall be implemented.
13. The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be provided by
the Community Development Department - Planning D~,v~s~on staff, and return one signed set to
the Community Development Department - Planning D~ivision for their files.
14 The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal Code
(Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee sit forth 'n that Ord'nance or by providing
documented evidence that the fees have already beer
15. If modified the applicant shall revise Exhibits "D, E & F",
Color and Material Board) to reflect the final Condition,·
copies.
16. The applicant shall submit to the Community Developr
permanent filing two (2) 8" X 10" glossy photographic
paid.
(Site Plan, Elevations, Landscape Plan,
of Approval and submit five (5) full size
lent Department - Planning Division for
color prints of the approved Color and
Materials Board and of the colored version of approved Exhibit "E", the colored architectural
elevations to the Commumty Development Departmer)t - Planning D~ws~on for their files. All
labe s on the Co or and Matenals Board and Elevation~ shall be readable on the photograph c
prints.
Prior to the Issuance of Building Permits
17. The Developer shall record a Lot Line Adjustment be een Lots 3 and 4.
18. A Consistency Check fee shall be paid per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule.
19. Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shalt be submitted to the
Community Development Department - Planning Division for approval. These plans shall
conform substantially with the approved Exhibit "F", orI as amended by these conditions. The
location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans
shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance.I The cover page shall identify the total
square footage of the landscaped area for the site. T~he plans shall be accompanied by the
following items: I
a. Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal).
b. One (1) copy of the approved grading plan.
c. Water usage calculations per Chapter 17.321 of the Development Code (Water
Efficient Ordinance).
d. Total cost estimate of plantings and irriga lion (in accordance with the approved
plan).
R:'~D P~?.000~DO.0448 Etco~Staff report 2.doc
20. All Queen Palms and Canary Island Pines planted at building entrances, building corners and
focal points shall be a minimum size of 20' clear trunk and 36" box respectively. The trees and
associated sizes shall be shown on the final landscaping plan.
21. The existing double offset rows of eucalyptus trees along the eastern property line shall be
continued to the southern property line. All trees planted shall have a minimum 15 gallon
container size and an irrigation system shall be provided. The trees and irrigation shall be shown
on the final landscaping and irrigation plans.
Prior to the Issuance of Occupancy Permits
22. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the
approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Director of Planning.
The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be
properly constructed and in good working order.
23. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Planning, to guarantee
the maintenance of the plantings, in accordance with the approved construction landscape and
irrigation plan shall be filed with the Community Development Department - Planning Division for
one year from final certificate of occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping and irrigation
system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Director of Planning, the bond
shall be released upon request by the applicant.
24. Each parking space rese~ed for the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently affixed
reflectorized sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying the
International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square inches in
area and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space at a minimum height of 80
inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space finished grade, or centered at a
minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space finished grade, ground, or sidewalk. A sign
shall also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each entrance to the off-street parking facility,
not less than 17 inches by 22 inches, clearly and conspicuously stating the following:
"Unauthorized vehicles parked in designated accessible spaces not
displaying distinguishing placards or license plates issued for
persons with disabilities may be towed away at owner's expense.
Towed vehicles may be reclaimed by telephoning 909 696-3000."
In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall have a surface
identification sign duplicating the Symbol of Accessibility in blue paint of at least 3 square feet in
size.
25. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by
this permit.
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
General Requirements
26. A Grading Permit for either rough and/or precise grading, including all on-site flat work and
improvements, shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement
of any construction outside of the City-maintained street right-of-way.
27. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way.
28. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the California Department of Transportation
prior to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed State right-of-way.
29. Grading plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing
R:~D P~2000~00-0448 Etco~Stafl report 2.doc
15
improvements contiguous to the site and shall be SL bmitted on standard 24" x 36" City of
Temecula mylars, th D I h II
Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit
30. Prior to the submittal of Grading Plans, e eve oper s, a coordinate its final site design with
the Department of Public Works to accommodate the 1-15/Cherry Street Interchange Project,
which may include but ~s not hm~ted to minor building Ioqat~on and parking lot configuration. The
revision to the approved site plan will be processed administratively through the City of
Temecula Community Development Department.
31. A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed and
approved by the Department of Public Works. The giading plan shall include all necessary
eros on control measures needed to adequately prote(~t adjacent public and private property.
32. The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and
erosion control improvements in conformance with ap'plicable City Standards and subject to
approval by the Department of Public Works,
33. A Soil Report shall be prepared by a registered Soil,~r Civil Engineer and submitted to the
Director of the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall
address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the construction of
engineered structures and pavement sections.
34. The Developer shall have a Drainage Study prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in
accordance with City Standards identifying storm water runoff expected from this site and
upstream of this site. The study shall ~dent~fy all ex~st~ng or proposed pubhc or pnvate drainage
facilities intended to discharge this runoff. The study shall also analyze and identify impacts to
downstream properties and provide specific recommendations to protect the properties and
mitigate any impacts. Any upgrading or ups~z~ng of downstream facilities, including acquisition
of drainage or access easements necessary to make required ~mprovements, shall be prowded
by the Developer.
35. The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (N PDES) permit from the State Wat ?r Resoumes Control Board. No grading
shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NO has been filed orthe project is shown
to be exempt.
36. As deemed necessary by the Director of the Departme it of Public Works, the Developer shall
receive written clearance from the following agencies:
a. San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board
b. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
c. Planning Department
d. Department of Public Works
37. The Developer shall comply with all constraints which nay be shown upon an Environmental
Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying r laps related to the subject property.
38. Permanent landscape and irrigation plans shall be sub ~itted to the Planning Department and
the Department of Public Works for review and approval.
39. The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or slope easements for off-site
work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public Works.
40. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the Riverside
County Flood Control and Water Conservation District b! f either cashier's check or money order,
R:~D P~000~00-0448 Etco~Staff repot1 2.doc
16
prior to issuance of permits, based on the ,prevailing area drainage plan fee. if the full Area
Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been credited to this property, no new
charge needs to be paid.
Prior to Issuance of a Building Permit
41. Precise grading plans shall conform to applicable City of Temecula Standards subject to
approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works. The following design criteria shall
be observed:
a. Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over A.C.
paving.
b. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula Standard No. 207A.
c. Concrete ramps shall be constructed along public street frontages in accordance
with City of Temecula Standard No. 402.
d. All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees.
e. All concentrated drainage directed towards the public street shall be conveyed
through undersidewalk drains.
42. The Developer shall construct the following~public improvements in conformance with applicable
City Standards and subject to approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works.
a. Street improvements, which may include, but not limited to: curb and gutter,
sidewalks, drive approaches and undersidewalk drain.
43. A construction area Traffic Control Plan shall be designed by a registered Civil or Traffic
Engineer and reviewed by the Director of the Department of Public Works for any street closure
and detour or other disruption to traffic circulation as required by the Department of Public
Works.
44. The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance with the
approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered Civil Engineer, and the Soil Engineer shall issue
a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions.
45. The Developer shall obtain an easement for ingress and egress over the adjacent property.
46. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as required by,
and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions
implementing Chapter 15.06.
Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy
47. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written
clearance from the following agencies:
a. Rancho California Water District
b. Eastern Municipal Water District
c. Department of Public Works
48. All public improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and City
standards to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works.
49. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall be
repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public
Works.
R:~D P~2.000~D0-0445 Etco~Staff report 2.doc
17
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
50. All design components shall comply with applicable Provisions of the 1998 edition of the
California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 1998 National Electrical Code; California
Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy and Disabled ~ccess Regulations and the Temecula
Municipal Code.
51. Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site !ighting plans showing compliance with
Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All street lights and other outdoor lighting
shall be shown on electncal plans submitted to the Department of Bu~ld~ng and Safety. Any
outside ~ght~ng sha be hooded and d rected so as notto sh~ne d;rectly upon adio n ng property
or public rights-of-way.
52. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted to the
Building & Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School Mitigation Fees.
53. Obta n a bud ng pans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work.
54. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings pr~or o SUDm~ a for plan review.
55. Disabled access from the public way to the main entran ,Ice of the building is required. The path of
travel shall meet the California Disabled Access Regulat, ions in terms of cross slope, travel slope
stripping and signage. Provide all details on plans. (California Disabled Access Regulations
effective April 1, 1998)
56 Al bud ng and faci ities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations Prov de all
detai s on plans. (California Disabled Access Regulations effective Apr I 1, 1998)
57. Provide disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building. /
58. Provide van accessible parking located as close as po~ssible to the main entry.
59. Show path of accessibility from parking to furthest poin~t of improvement.
60. Provide house electrical meter provisions for power fo~r the operation of exterior lighting, fire
alarm systems.
61 Restroom fixtures, number and type, to be n accordan¢e with the provs ons of the 1998 edition
of the Californ a Bud ng Code Appendix 29. Obtain the D~wslon of the State Architect
recommendation for the accessible restroom d~mens~ons for toddlers from the Building Official,
to implement in the building design.
62. Provide an approved automatic fire sprinkler system.
63. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional
for plan review.
64. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and
mechanical plan for plan review.
65. Truss calculations that are stamped by the engineE
engineer are required for plan review submittal.
~ith original signature on plans submitted
anel schedule, plumbing schematic and
of record and the truss manufacturer
R:~D P~2000~O0-O448 Etco~Staff report 2,doc
18
66. Provide precise grading plan for plan check submittal to check for handicap accessibility.
67. A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the building
construction.
68. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standard and any block walls if not on the approved
building plans, will require separate approvals and permits.
69. Show all building setbacks.
70. Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrance to the project that indicates the hours of
construction, shown below, as allowed by the City of Temecula Ordinance No. 0-90-04,
specifically Section G (1) of Riverside CoUnty Ordinance No. 457.73, for any site within one-
quarter mile of an occupied residence.
Monday-Friday
6:30 a.m. - 6:30 p.m.
Saturday
7:00 a.m. - 6:30 p.m.
No work is permitted on Sunday or Government Holidays
FIRE DEPARTMENT
71. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by the
Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California
Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in force at the
time of building plan submittal.
72. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction
of ali commercial buildings per CFC Appendix III.A, Table A-III-A-1. The developer shall provide
for this project, a water system capable of delivering 1500 GPM at 20 PSI residual operating
pressure, plus an assumed sprinkler demand of 850 GPM for a total fire flow of 2350 GPM with
a 4 hour duration. The required fire flow maY be adjusted during the approval process to reflect
changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire protection measures as approved by the
Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire Flow as given above has taken into account all information as
provided. (CFC 903.2, Appendix Ill-A)
73. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC Appendix
Ill-B, Table A-III-B-1. A combination of on-site and off-site super fire hydrants (6" x 4" x 2-2 1/2"
outlets) shall be located on Fire Department access roads and adjacent public streets. Hydrants
shall be spaced at 300 feet apart, at each intersection and shall be located no more than 180
feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The
required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of
existing fire hydrants may be required. (CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix Ill-B)
74. As required by the California Fire Code, when any portion of the facility is in excess of 150 feet
from a water supply on a public street, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of
the facility, on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be
provided. For this project on site fire hydrants are required. (CFC 903.2)
75. If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection prior to
any building construction. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2)
R:'~D P'~2.000~,00-0448 Etco~Staff report 2.doc
19
76. Prior to building construction, all locations where strucl ares are to be built shall have approved
temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for Jse until permanent roads are installed.
Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an II weather surface for 80,000 lbs. GVW.
(CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2)
77. Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved Fire
Department vehicle access roads to w~thm 150 feet to any porbon of the fac~hty or any port~on of
an exterior wall of the building(s). F~re Department access roads shall be an all weather surface
designed for 80,000 lbs. GVVV with a minimum AC thickness of .25 feet. ( CFC sec 902)
78. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unlobstructed width of not less than twenty-
four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13) feet six (6)
inches. (CFC 902.2.2.1)
79.The gradient for a fire apparatus access roads shall
902.2.2.6 Ord. 99-14)
80. Prior to building construction, dead end road ways and
(150) feet which have not been completed shall have a
fire apparatus. (CFC 902.2.2.4)
not exceed fifteen (15) percent. (CFC
~treets in excess of one hundred and fifty
turnaround capable of accommodating
81. Prior to building construction, this development shall have two (2) points of access, via alt-
weather surface roads, as approved bythe Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 902.2.1)
2 f I h III th t t
8 . Prior to issuance o bui ding permits the developer s a furnish one copy of e wa er sys em
plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to,' installation. Plans shall be signed by a
registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature block; and
conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum, fire flow standards. After the plans are
signed by the local water company, the originals shall be presented to the Fire Prevention
Bureau for signatures. The reqmred water system ~ncludlng fire hydrants shall be ~nstalled and
accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combusbble building materials being
placed on an individual lot. (CFC 8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and National Fire Protection Association 24
1-4.1) f ~ rtf t f'" ' I~ ' I"BI R fl t
83. Prior to issuance o at.;e iicaeo uccupancyorouiaipgfina, ue e eciveMarkers"shall
be installed to identify fire hydrant locations. (CFC 901 J4.3)
4 f dd
8 . Priortoissuanceo a Certificate of Occupancy or buildi.g final, approvednumbersora resses
shall be prowded on all new and ex~sbng buildings in such a poslbon as to be plainly ws~ble and
legible from the street or road fronting the property. Numbers shall be of a contrasbng color to
their background. Commercial, mulb-fam~ly residential and industrial buildings shall have a
minimum twelve (12) ~nches numbers with suite numbers a m~n~mum of s~x (6) inches in size. All
suites shall gave a minimum of six (6) inch high letters~ and/or numbers on both the front and
rear doors. S~ngle family residences and multi-family residential un~ts shall have four (4) inch
letters and/or numbers, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 901.4.4)
85. P' t ' f" rt'f' t f'" b 'Id' If. I b d f ta d'
nor olssuanceo ~,e ~ ~ca eo uccupancyor u~ lng ~na, ase onsquare oo gean type
of construction, occupancy or use, the developer sh~all install a fire sprinkler system. Fire
sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation.
(CFC Article 10, CBC Chapter 9)
86. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or buildling final, based on a requirement for
R:~D P~000~00-0448 Etco~Staff report 2.doc
20
monitoring the sprinkler system, occupancy or use, the developer shall install an fire alarm
system monitored by an approved Underwriters Laboratory listed central station. Plans shall be
submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. (CFC Article 10)
87. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a "Knox-Box" shall be
provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six (6) feet in height and be located to
the right side of the main entrance door. (CFC 902.4)
88. All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates obstructing
Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry system for
emergency access by fire fighting personnel. (CFC 902.4)
89. Prior to final inspection of any building, the applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire
Department for approval, a site plan designating Fire Lanes with appropriate lane painting and
or signs.
90. Prior to the building final, speculative buildings capable of housing high-piled combustible stock,
shall be designed with the following fire protection and life safety features: an automatic fire
sprinkler system(s) designed for a specific commodity class and storage arrangement, hose
stations, alarm systems, smoke vents, draft curtains, Fire Department access doors and Fire
department access roads. Buildings housing high-piled combustible stock shall comply with the
provisions California Fire Code Article 81 and all applicable National Fire Protection Association
standards. This building having a stated planned use of mercantile is conditioned for a
sprinkler system consistent with mercantile, and accordingly high piled storage will
always be prohibited. (CFC Article 81 )
Special Conditions
91. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final a simple plot plan and a simple
floor plan, each as an electronic file of the .DWG format must be submitted to the Fire
Prevention Bureau. Alternative file formats may be acceptable, contact fire prevention for
approval.
92. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Fire Code permit process and update
any changes in the items and quantities approved as part of their Fire Code permit. These
changes shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for review and approval per the Fire
Code and is subject to inspection. (CFC 105)
93. The applicant shall submit for review and approval by the Riverside County Department of
Environmental Health and City Fire Department an update to the Hazardous Material
Inventory Statement and Fire Department Technical Report on file at the city; should any
quantities used or stored onsite increase or should changes to operation introduce any
additional hazardous material not listed in existing reports. (CFC Appendix II-E)
COMMUNITY SERVICES
94. Prior to issuance of building permits or installation of street lights, whichever comes first, the
developer shall file an application with the TCSD and pay the appropriate energy fees related
to the transfer of said street lights into the TCSD maintenance program.
R:~D P',2_000~)0-0448 F_tco~Staff report 2.doc
21
OTHER AGENCIES
95. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations ~et forth in the Rancho California Water
District's transmittal dated November 8, 2000, a copy bf which is attached.
96. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Eastern Information
Center, Department of Anthropology, University of Cahforn~a, transmittal dated November 8,
2000, a copy of which is attached, t
97. The applicant shall comply with the recommenda ions set forth in the County of Riverside
Department of Environmental Health's transmittal date~l November 15, 2000, a copy of which is
attached.
98. By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have re d, understand and accept all the above
Conditions of Approval. I further understand thatI the property shall be maintained in
conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the
project shall be subject to Planning Commission approval.
Applicant's Signature
Name printed
Date
R:'~O P~2000',00-0448 Etco',,Staff report 2.doc
22
November 8, 2000
Carole Donahoe, Case Planner
City of Temecula
Planning Department
43200 Business Park Drive
Post Office Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
SUBJECT:
WATER AVAILABILITY
PARCELS NO. 3 AND NO. 4 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 23561-1
APN 910-272-005 AND APN 910-272-006
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA00-0448
Dear Ms. Donahoe:
Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located within the
boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD). Water service,
therefore, would be available upon completion of financial arrangements betxveen
RCWD and the property owner.
If fire protection is required, the customer will need to contact RCWD for fees
requirements.
Water availability would be contingent upon the property owner signing an
Agency Agreement that assigns water management rights, if any, to RCWD.
If you should have any questions, please contact an Engineering Services
Representative at this office.
Sincerely,
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT
Steve Brannon, P.E.
Development Engineering Manager
00\S B:at225~F012-T3\FCF
NOU--08-2000 14: 46
~ALIFORNIA
IIISTORICAL
I~ESOURCES
~NFORMATION
~YSTEM
AP" 'EIC/PJRTHRO UCR
Eastern Imormebon Center
DeD~'nent of An~hropoloc~
Riverside. CA 92521-0418
Phone (gO9) 787.5745
Fax ~09) 787-5409
November B, 2000
TO: Carols Donahoe
City of Temecula Planning Department
RE: Cultural Resource Review
Case: PA 00-0448
Records at the Eastern nformat on Center of the Calif¢ nia Historical Resources Information
System have been reviewed to determine if this projedt would adversely affect prehistoric
or historic cultural resources: i I '
The proposed project area has not been surveyed for ou tufa resouroes and contmns or is adjacent to
IS recommended.
known cultural resource(s). A Phase I study '
Based upon existing data the proposed project area has the
~ A Phase I study is recommended. I potential for containing cultural resources,
A Phase I cultural resource study {MF # ) identified one or more cultural resources.
I
~ The project area contains, or has t e possibility of conta n ng, cultural resources. However, due to the
nature of the project or prior data recovery studies, an adverse effect on cultural resources is not
anticipated. Further study is not recommended.
~ Arecommended.Phase I cultural resource study (MF # ) identified no cultural resources. Further study is not
There is a Iow probability of cultural resources. Further study is not recommended.
If during construction, cultural resources are encountered, work should be halted or diverted in the
immediate area while a qualified archaeologist evaluates the finds and makes recommendations.
Due to the archaeological sensitivity of the area, earthmoving during construction should be monitored
by a professional archaeologist.
The submission of a cultural resource management report '~s recommended following guidelines for
Archaeological Resource Management Reports prepared by t.he California Office of Historic Preservation,
Preservation P/anning Bul/etin 4(a), December 1989.
~ Phase I Records search and field survey
_ Phasell Testing [Evaluate resource significance; propose~ re!rig.arian measures for "significant" sites.]
_ Phase III Mitigation [Data recovery by excavation, preservation ~n place, or a combination of the two.]
-- Phase IV Monitor earthmoving activities
COMMENTS:
If you have any questions, please contact us.
Easter Information CenTer
CObNTY OF RIVERSIDE · HEALTm SERVICES AGENCY
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HE
November 15.2000
City of Temecula Planning Department
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589
RE: Plot Plan No. PA00-0448
Dear Carole Donahoe:
1. The Department of Environmental Health has reviewed the Plot Plan No. PA00-0448 and has no objections.
Sanita~ sewer and water services may be available in this area.
2. PRIOR TO ANY PLAN CHIqCK SUBMITTAL for health clearance, the folloxving items are required:
a) "Will-serve" letters from the appropriate water and sewering agencies.
b) A clearance letter from the Hazardous Services Materials Management Branch (909) 358-5055 will be
required indicating that the project has been cleared for:
· Underground storage tanks, Ordinance #617.4.
· Hazardous Waste Generator Services, Ordinance #615.3.
· Hazardous Waste Disclosure (in accordance w/th Ordinance #651.2.
· Waste Reduction Management
Sincerely,
SM:dr
(909) 955-8980
NOTE:
Health Specialist
Any current additional requirements not covered can be applicable at time of Building Plan
review for final Department of Environmental Health clearance.
Cc: Doug Thompson. Hazardous Materials
//d~/Nov o 2000
Local Enforcement Aflen¢¥ RO. Box 1280. Riverside. CA 92502-1280 ' f9091 955-8982 * FAX (909/ 781-9653 * 4080 Lemon Street. 9Ih Floor. Riverside. CA 9250
Land Use and Ware* Engineering * PO. Box 1206. Riverside. CA 92502-1206 ~ :9091955-8980 * FAX (9091955-8903 * 4080 Lemon Street. 2nd Floor. Rlvemde. CA ....
ATrACHMENT NO.
EXHIBITS
R:~D P~2.000~0-0448 Etco~Staff repOrt 2.doc
23
CITY OF TEMECUI.J~ ,~-
lect Site
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 00-0448 (Development Plan
EXHIBIT A
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - September 5, 2001
R:\D P~000\00-0448 Etco\Staf report 2.doc
VICINITY MAP
CITY OF TEMECULA
EXHIBIT B ZONING MAP
DESIGNATION - SC (Service Commerciall
· :. ~.~.:.~.:.~.:.!.:.!.:.i.:.:.~..:...'~.[,~?~,~,?',;?,:,:~-?~,,,~
~ = i'!'!-i'i'!'i': '.'/..: :..'-'~,
~~~.:.i.: .:, :.
/B > o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o_ _'~::':':."/o o~:~ ,
EXHIBIT C GENERAL PLAN
DESIGNATION - SC (Se~ice Commemial).
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 00-0448 (Development Plan)
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - September 5, 2001
R:\D P~2000\00-0448 Etco\Staf report 2.doc
CITY OF TEMECU ~LJA
Z
.---'t ~3
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 00-0448 (De~lopment Plan)
EXHIBIT D
PLANNING COMMISS ON DATE - September 5, 2001
SITE PLAN
R:\D P~2000\00-0448 Etco\Staf report 2.doc
CITY OF TEMECULA
I~ONll{PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 00-0448 (Development Plan) ,~*1~_ -- II
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - September 5, 2001 II
R:\D P~000\00-0448 Etco\Staf report 2.do~
CITY OF TEMECU[
iii
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 00-0448 (Development Plan'
EXHIBIT F
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - September 5, 2001
LANDSCAPE
R:~D P~000~00-0448 Etco\Staf report 2.doc
ITEM #4,
STAFF REPORT- PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECU ,~1~
PLANNING COMMISSION
September 5, 2001
Planning Application No. 01-0187 (l~evelopment Plan)
/
Prepared by: Rolfe Preisendanz, Assistant Planner
RECOMMENDATION: The Community Developme,nt Department - Planning Division Staff
recommends the Planning Commission:
fE t f ' lit ' 1 1 7
1. ADOPT a Notice o xemp ion or Planning Appica ion No. 0 -0 8 pursuant to Section
15332 of the California Environmental Quality Act;
2. ADOPT a Resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2~ I01-_
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING IAPPLICATION NO. 01-
0187, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO DESIGN, CONSTRUCT AND
OPERATE A 55,697 SQUARE FOOT IEXECUTIVE OFFICE
BUILDING FOR INLAND VALLEY TERRACE INVESTMENT
GROUP, LLC. ON 3.24 VACANT ACRES WITHIN WESTSlDE
BUSINESS CENTRE, A PORTION OF PARCEL I OF PARCEL
MAP 28084 AND PARCEL 4 OF TEI{ITATIVE MAP 28473.
GENERALLY LOCATED EAST OF THE W~ESTERN BYPASS AND
SOUTH OF ROICK DRIVE, KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL
NO. 909-320-048 D I t I
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT: Scott R. Barone / Edge eve opmen, nc.
REPRESENTATIVE:
PROPOSAL:
LOCATION:
Scott R. Barone
To design, construct and Ol
office building on 3.24 acr(
Business Centre.
~erate a 55,697 square foot executive
of vacant land within the Westside
East of Western Bypass and outh of Roick Drive, a portion of parcel
I of PM 28084 and parcel 4 ~3f Tentative Parcel Map 28473
EXISTING ZONING:
Light Industrial (LI)
SURROUNDING ZONING:
North: Light Industrial (LI)
South: Light Industrial (LI)
East: Light Industrial (LI)
West: Light Industrial (LI)
R:\D P~001\01-0187 Inland Valley Terrace Investment Group\S laff Report.doc
GENERAL PLAN '"
DESIGNATION: Business Park (BP)
EXISTING LAND USE: Vacant
SURROUNDING LAND
USES:
North: Vacant
South: Vacant
East: Vacant
West: Vacant
PROJECT STATISTICS (DEVELOPMENT PLAN)
Lot Area (gross):
Lot area (net)
158,994 square feet (3.65 acres)
141,134 square feet (3.24 acres)
Footprint:
Building Square footage:
28,701 square feet
55,697 square feet
Building Height:
Landscaped Area:
Parking Required:
Parking Provided:
36'-0"
28,255 square feet (20%)
186 vehicular, 6 handicapped, 9 bicycle, and 5 motorcycle
170 standard vehicular, 16 compact, 7 handicapped, 9
bicycle, 5 motorcycle and 3 unloading spaces.
Lot Coverage: 39.5%
Floor Area Ratio: .395
BACKGROUND
The formal application was submitted to the Planning Department on April 17, 2001. The first
Development Review Committee (DRC) meeting was held on May 3, 2001. This DRC meeting
prompted various comments, which were detailed for the applicant in a letter dated June 7, 2001.
The project was deemed complete on May 24, 2001. The applicant requested that we hold a
second DRC (held on August 2, 2001) in order to clarify all comments.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The project Inland Valley Terrace Business Center, proposes to develop 3.24 gross vacant acres
with a 55,697 square foot two story executive office building. Edge Development is a
Development/General Contractor who is primarily involved in the design, development and
construction of commercial / industrial / institutional and residential development. The primary
function of the site will be executive office uses of which Edge Development will occupy 30% and
70% for speculative office use. Edge Development, Inc. will initially employ 90 office personnel and
operate a single shift between the hours of 7:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M. The amount of average daily
trips generated is 40 clients and 20 deliveries, utilizing delivery trucks similar to those used by
FEDEX and U PS. The underlying parcel map, including the subject lot, was approved at the August
23, 2001 Director Hearing.
R;\D P~.001\01-0187 Inland Valley Terrace Investment Group\Staff Report.doc
2
ANALYSIS
Site Desi,qn
The pro ect is located on the east side of Western Bypass, south of Roick Drive. The building is
situated on the east side of the parcel. The lot coverage f(~r this project has been calculated to be
39%. The City of Temecula Development Code allows m-~ximum lot coverage of 40% in the Light
Industrial (LI) designation. The C~ty of Temecula Development Code identifies a target floor area
ratio of 0.40 for development within the Light Industrial (LI)
for the project is 0.39
Access, Traffic and Circulation
Access for the site will be taken from the Western Bypass
parcels #3 and #5. Parking for the project is located on
designation. The floor area ratio (FAR)
via two shared driveways with abutting
the west, north, and south side of the
property, with the entrance of the building being oriented towards the west. The Public Works
Department has reviewed traffic impacts associated with this project and has indicated that the
mpacts of the project are within the traffic volumes predicted as a part of the City General Plan and
will not be significant. Emergency vehicles are able to acce~ss the site to provide the appropriate fire
and life safety services.
Architecture, Color and Materials
The Inland Valley Terrace Business Center will be a prominent executive office corporate facility
located on the most westerly developable lot along the Santa Rosa hillside. When completed the
building will be pleasantly visible (Incorporating the colors and materials of the natural terrain) from a
variety of points of interest within the City of Temecula. The; general appearance of the building will
establish a sense of professionalism and prestige encouraged by the City of Temecula. The
prominent architectural elements, which reveal a sense of ~tructure, have been used throughout the
building, providing a variety of angles as well as horizontal and vertical planes. The main entry is
prominently oriented to the Western Bypass bounded with ~ complementary use of clear and bronze
glazing, natural tile accents and crowned with a treatment of composite aluminum panels. Stamped
concrete accent paving and an attractive ceremomal entry plaza enhance the ma n entrance to the
building.
The design and detailing of the building's architecture i in keeping with the existing industrial
building design. The variations in building form throughoutlthe proiect provide visual interest to the
project through the use of defined wall articulations, structural shapes and a variety of materials.
The unique architectural definition of the entry will provide [visual interest that will draw attention to
the building's entry. The colors chosen for the building willlcomplement the natural colors found in
the existing hillside vegetation and will raise the bar for future development. Slate Tile will be
applied to a large portion of the architectural element on the west elevation. The use of composite
"champagne metallic" aluminum panels will provide acce~t to the highest section of the building
providing viability for all elevations. The various structural/architectural elements outlining the
building will be treated w th extedor plaster, colored with "M~3nroe Bisque". The window glass for the
pr mary port on of the bu ding will be clear-bronzed glass w~th clear glass utlhzed at the entry.
Landscapinq
The landscaping proposed for Inland Valley Terrace Business Center will complement the
arch tecture of the bu ding, prowd~ng an esthebcally pleasing framework for this unique archltectu e.
The f ve Mexican Fan Pa ms situated a ong the front elevat on w~ll assist in softening the ~mpact of
the building, while providing some depth and scale to the building's architecture. To balance the
height of the Palm trees located on the northerly half of the building the appl cant has proposed 24'
R:~D P~2001\01-0187 Inland Valley Terrace Investment Group\Staff Report.doc
3
box Flowering Pear on the opposite end. The streetscape proposed along the Western Bypass will
establish the precedence for future development, which includes a continuum of London Plane trees
accentuated by a band of Fern Pines planted in the landscaping area developed to screen the
parking lot. The applicant has provided 24" box Flowering Pear trees within the landscaping from
the Western Bypass to the main entry to the building providing visual interest and drawing a visitors
glance to the main entry. The parking lot will consist a combination of 24" box Fern Pines and 24"
box Canary Island Pines.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
This project has been determined not to have a significant effect on the environment and is
Categorically Exempt from CEQA (Section 15332 In-fill Development Projects). The following
criteria have been met:
The project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable
general plan policies, as well as, with applicable zoning designation and regulations.
The proposed development occurs within city limits on a project site of no more than five
acres substantially surrounded by urban uses.
· The project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species.
· Approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air
quality, or water quality.
· The site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services.
EXISTING ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION
The General Plan Land Use designation for the site is (BP) Business Park. Existing zoning for the
site is (LI) (Light Industrial). The project as proposed, meets all minimum standards of and is
consistent with the General Plan, the Development Code, local ordinances, and the Design
Guidelines.
SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS
The project has been determined by staff to be consistent with all-applicable City ordinances,
standards, guidelines, and policies. It is staff's opinion that the project is compatible with
surrounding developments in terms of design and quality.
FINDINGS
The proposed use is in conformance with the general plan for Temecula and with applicable
requirements of state law and other ordinances of the City.
The proposal is consistent with the land use designation and policies reflected for
development in the City of Temecula General Plan, as well as the development standards
for (LI) Light Industrial zoning. The site is therefore properly planned and zoned and found
tobephysicallysuitableforthetypeanddensityofindustrialdevelopmentproposed. The
project as conditioned is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and
local ordinance, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City Wide
Design Guidelines, and fire and building codes.
2. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health,
R:',D P',2.001\01-0187 inland Valley Terrace Investment Group\Staff Report.doc
4
safety, and general welfare·
The overall design of the project, including the sit{ building, parking, circulation and other
associated site improvements, is consistent with ~and intended to protect the health and
safety of those working in and around the site. The project has been reviewed, and as
conditioned, has been found to be consistent w, lth, all applicable policies, guidelines,
standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and
function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety and welfare.
The design of the proposed improvements is not li,kely to cause substantial environmental
damage or substantially and unavoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat.
There are no fish wildlife, or habitat on the project site and the project will not affect any
fish, wildlife, or habitat off-site. The site is surroun~led by development and is an in-fill site.
The project w/ll not ~ndiwdually or cumulatively have an adverse effect on wildlife resources,
as defined in Section 711.2 of the Fish and Game Code.
Attachments-
PC Resolution - Blue Page 6
Exhibit A: Conditions of Approval for PA01-0187
Exhibits for PA01-0187 (Development Plan) - Blu
A. Vicinity Map
B. Zoning Map
C. General Plan Map
D. Site Plan
E. Grading Plan
F. Building Elevations
G. Wall Elevation
H. First Floor Plan
I. Second Floor Plan
J. Landscape Plan
)evelopment Plan) - Blue Page 9
Page 21
R:~D P~2001\01-0187 Inland Valley Terrace Investment Group\~ taft Report.doc
5
AriTACHMENT NO.
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2001-
APPROVING PA01-0'~ 87
DEVELOPMENT PL~ ~N
R:\D P~2001\01,0187 Inland Valley Terrac~ Investment Group\Staff Report.doc
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2001-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING ~,I~PPUCATION NO.PA01-
0187, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO DESIGN, CONSTRUCT AND
OPERATE A 55,697 SQUARE FOOT IEXECUTIVE OFFICE
BUILDING FOR INLAND VALLEY TE,RRACE INVESTMENT
GROUP, LLC. ON 3.24 VACANT ACRE, S WITHIN WESTSIDE
BUSINESS CENTRE PORTION OF PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP
28084 AND PARCEL 4 OF TENTATIVE IPARCEL MAP 28473.
GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE WESTERN
BYPASS AND KNOWN AS ASSESSORS [PARCEL NO. 909-320-
O48
WHEREAS, Edge Development, Inc., filed Plan,ning Application No. PA01-0187 (the
Application"), n a manner in accord with the C~ty of Temecula General Plan and Development
Code;
WHEREAS, the Application was processed includir
time and manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a regular
g, but not limited to a public notice, in the
meeting, considered the Application on
September 5, 2001, at a duly noticed public hearing as pres'cribed by law, at which time the City staff
and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testi~ either in support or in opposition to this
matter;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the
testimony, the Commission recommended approval of thelApplication subject to and based upon
the findings set forth hereunder;
WHEREAS, all legal preconditions to the adoption of th s Reso ut on have occurred.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOL~LOWS:
Section 1. That the above recitations are true and Icorrect and are hereby incorporated by
reference. .-. ' I at on hereb
Section 2. Findinqs. The Planning L, ommissi,en, in approving the ,~pp ici y
makes the following findings as required by Section 17.05.010.F of the Temecula Municipal Code:
A. The proposal is consistent with the land us,e designation and policies reflected for
development in the City of Temecula General Plan, as well as the development standards for (LI)
Light Industrial development contained in the City's Devel~)pment Code.
/
B. The overall design of the project, including t,he site, building, parking, circulation and
other associated site improvements, is consistent with and intended to protect the health and safety
of those working in and around the site. The project has I~een reviewed and as conditioned, has
been found to be consistent with all applicable policies, Iguidelines, standards and regulations
intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent
with the public health, safety, and welfare. ~
C. The design of the proposed improvemelnts
R:\D P~2001\01-0187 Inland Valley Terrace Investment Group\Staff
7
is not likely to cause substantial
Report.doc
environmental damage or substantially and unavoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. There
is no fish or wildlife habitat on the project site, and the project will not affect any fish or wildlife
habitat off-site. The site is surrounded by development and is an in-fill site. Furthermore, grading
has already occurred at the site, which is a portion of a larger industrial park. The project will not
individually or cumulatively have an adverse effect on wildlife resources, as defined in Section 711.2
of the Fish and Game Code.
Section 3. Environmental Compliance. The project has been found to be categorically
exempt Pursuant to Section 15332 class 32 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines.
No further environmental review is required for the proposed project.
Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby
conditionally approves the Application, a request to design, construct, and operate a 55,697 square
foot Executive Office Building on 3.24 gross vacant acres for all the foregoing reasons and subject
to the project specific conditions set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by
this reference together with any and all necessary conditions that may be deemed necessary.
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning
Commission this 5th day of September 2001.
Dennis Chinaeff, Chairperson
Al'rEST:
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certifythat
PC Resolution No. 01 -._was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 5th day of September, 2001, by the following vote
of the Commission:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
R:\D P',2001\01-0187 Inland Valley Terrace Investment Group\Staff Report.doc
8
EXHIBIT A
CONDITIONS OF APPR( ]VAL
PA01-0187 DEVELOPIVIENT PLAN
R:\D P~2001\01-0187 Inland Valley Terrace Investment Group\.
9
taff ReporLdoc
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF TEMECUI
.A
Case Planner
Project Name:
DIF Category:
Assessor's Parcel No:
Approval Date:
Expiration Date:
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Within
1.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL !
Planning Application No: PA01-0187 (Develo~pment Plan)
Project Description: Request for a DevOe opment Plan to design, construct,
and operate a 511,697 square foot executive office
building on 3.24 vacant acres within the Westside
Business Centre.
Rolfe Preisendanz Assistant Planner
Inland Valley Terra ce Business Center
Industrial
909-320-048
September 5, 2001
September 5, 2003
Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this 'roject
The applicant shall deliver to the Community Dev~ 3pment Department - Planning Division a
cashier's check or money order made payable to tt' e County Clerk in the amount of seventy-
eight Dollars ($78.00) for the County administrativ~ fee, to enable the City to file the Notice
of Exemption as provided under Pubhc Resources~ Code Section 21108(b) and California
Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said !orty-eight (48) hour period the applicant
has not delivered to the Community Development Department - Planning Division the check
as required above, the approval for the project gra~ted shall be void by reason of failure of
condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c).
General Requirements
2.
The permittee/applicant shall indemnify, protect a~
or instrumentality thereof, and/or any of its officem
~ hold harmless, the City and any agency
employees, and agents from any and all
claims, actions, or proceedings against the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, or
any of its officers, employees, and agents, to attack;, set aside, void, annul, or seek monetary
damages resulting from an approval of the City, o,r any agency or instrumentality thereof,
advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters
of the City, concerning the Planning ApplicatiOn which action is brought within the
appropriate statute of limitations period and Public Resources Code, Division 13, Chapter 4
(Section 21000 et seq., including but not by the wa~ of limitations Section 21152 and 21187).
The City shall promptly notify the permittee/appli,cant of any claim, action, or proceeding
brought forth within this time period. The City sha!l estimate the cost of the defense of the
action and applicant shall deposit said amount with the City. City may require additional
deposits to cover anticipated costs. City shall refund, without interest, any unused portions
of the deposit once the litigation is finally conclude~. Should the City fail to either promptly
notify or cooperate fully, permittee/applicant shall not, thereafter be responsible to indemnify,
R:\D P~2001\01-0187 Inland Valley Terrace Investment Group\Staff Report.doc
10
defend, protect, or hold harmless the City, any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its
officers, employees, or agents. Should the applicant fail to timely post the required deposit,
the Director may terminate the land use approval without further notice to the applicant.
=
All conditions shall be complied with prior to any occupancy or use allowed by this
Development Plan.
The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of
this development plan.
This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall
become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction
contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period, which is thereafter diligently
pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this
approval.
The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibits D
(Site Plan), E (Grading Plan), F (Elevation), G (Elevation), H (Floor Plan)i I (Floor Plan), J
(Landscape Plans) and K (Color and Material Board) contained on file with the Community
Development Department - Planning Division.
Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable
satisfaction of the Planning Director. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being
maintained, the Planning Director shall have the authority to require the property owner to
bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued
maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any
successors in interest.
All mechanical and roof equipment shall be fully screened from public view by being placed
below the lowest level of the surrounding parapet wall.
The colors and materials for the project shall substantially conform to those noted directly
below and with Exhibit "K" (Color and Material Board), contained on file with the Community
Development Department - Planning Division.
Primary wall exterior:
Exterior plaster soffit Accent
Composite Aluminum Panels
Slate Tile Accent
Building Glazing
Entry Glazing
Storefront/Curtain Wall
Benjamin Moore "Monroe Bisque"
Benjamin Moore "Cromwell Gray"
"Champagne Metallic"
Clear Bronze
Clear
Clear Anodized
10.
The construction landscape drawings shall indicate coordination and grouping of all utilities,
which are screened from view per applicable City Codes and guidelines.
Prior to the Issuance of Grading Permits
11.
12.
The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal
Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that Ordinance or by
providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid.
The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be provided
by the Community Development Department - Planning Division staff, and return one signed
set to the Community Development Department - Planning Division for their files.
R:\D P~001\01-0187 Inland Valley Terrace Investment Group\Staff Report,doc
11
13. The applicant shall revise Exhibits "D, E, F, G, H, I J and K", (Site Plan, Grading Plan,
Elevation(s), Floor Plan(s), Landscape Plan, and Color and Material Board) to reflect the
final conditions of approval that will be provided by Se Community Development Department
- Planning Division staff. The applicant shall submit five (7) full size copies, one (1) reduced
8.5"xl 1" copy of Exhibits D through 1, two (2) 8" X110" glossy photographic color prints of
approved Exhibit "K" (Color and Materials Board) and (2) 8" x 10" glossy photographic color
pr nts of the colored version of approved Exh~b,t F and G, the colored architectural
elevations to the Community Development Department Planning Division for their files. Al
labels on the Color and Materials Board and Elevations shall be readable on the
photographic pdnts.
Prior to the Issuance of Building Permits
14.
15.
16.
The applicant shall insure that the underlying Parcel Map 28473 has been recorded with the
County of Riverside. /
A Consistency Check fee shall be paid per the Cit~ of Temecula Fee Schedule.
Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and !rrigation Plans shall be submitted to the
Community Development Department - Planning Division for approval. These plans shall
conform substantially with the approved Exhibit "J", ~)r as amended by these conditions. The
~' h
location, number, genus, species, and container s~ze of the plants shall be shown. T e
pans sha be consistent with the Water Efficient O~rdinance. The cover page shall 'dent fy
the total square footage of the landscaped ar~a for the site. The plans shall be
accompanied by the following items:
ao
Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Teme
submittal).
One (1) copy of the approved grading plan
Water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32
Efficient Ordinance).
Total cost estimate of plantings and irrigati
plan).
Prior to the Issuance of Occupancy Permits
17.
18.
19.
An Administrative Development Plan application
signage not included on Exhibits "D" and "F", o~
separate building permit shall be required for all sig
"D" and "F", or as amended by these conditions.
All required landscape planting and irrigation shall
approved construction plans and shall be in a cond
;ula Fee Schedule at time of
of the Development Code (Water
)n (in accordance with the approved
for signage shall be required for any
as amended by these conditions, A
~age identified on the approved Exhibits
have been installed consistent with the
tion acceptable to the Planning Director.
The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall
be properly constructed and in good working order~.
I t
Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Planning Director, to guaran ee
the maintenance of the landscape plantings, ~n accordance w~th the approved construction
landscape and irngat~on plan shall be filed w~th the iCommun~ty Development Department -
Planning Division for one year from final certificate of occupancy. After that year, if the
landscaping and irrigation system have been maintained in a condition satisfactoP/to the
Planning Director, the bond shall be released.
R:\D P~001\01-0187 Inland Valley Terrace Investment Group\Staff Report.doc
12
20.
21.
22.
23.
The Development Impact Fees associated with this project must be paid to the City of
Temecula.
Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently
affixed reflectorized sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying
the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square
inches in area and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space at a minimum
height if 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space finished grade, or
centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space finished grade, ground,
or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each entrance to the off-
street parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches, clearly and conspicuously stating
the following:
"Unauthorized vehicles parked in designated accessible spaces not
displaying distinguishing placards or license plates issued for
persons with disabilities may be towed away at owner's expense.
Towed vehicles may be reclaimed by telephoning 909 696-30002
In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall have a
sudace identification sign duplicating the Symbol of Accessibility in blue paint of at least 3
square feet in size.
All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed
by this permit.
BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT
24. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 1998 edition of the
California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 1998 National Electrical Code;
California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy and Disabled Access Regulations and the
Temecula Municipal Code.
25. Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plans showing compliance
with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All streetlights and other outdoor
lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and
Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly upon
adjoining property or public rights-of-way.
26. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted to
the Building & Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School
Mitigation Fees.
27. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction
work.
28. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review.
29. Disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building is required. The
path of travel shall meet the California Disabled Access Regulations in terms of cross slope,
travel slope stripping and signage. Provide all details on plans. (California Disabled
Access Regulations effective April 1, 1998)
30. All building and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations. Provide
all details on plans. (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1, 1998)
R:\D P~2.001\01-0187 Inland Valley Terrace Investment Group\Staff Report.doc
13
31.
32.
Provide disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building.
Provide van accessible parking located as close a! possible to the main entry.
33.
34.
Show path of accessibility from parking to furthest ~oint of improvement.
Provide house electrical meter provisions for powe for the operation of exterior lighting, fire
alarm systems.
35. Restroom fixtures, number and type, to be in accordance with the provisions of the 1998
Code Appendi~ 29. Obtain the Division of the State
edition
of
the
California
Building
Architect recommendation for the accessible restroom dimensions for toddlers from the
Building Official, to implement in the building desig~n.
36. Provide an approved automatic fire sprinkler syste~.
37,
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
43.
44.
Provide appropriate stamp of a registered profe.,
submitted for plan review.
Provide electrical plan including load calculations
and mechanical plan for plan review.
sional with original signature on plans
nd panel schedule, plumbing schematic
Truss calculations that are stamped by the engineer of record and the truss manufacturer
engineer are required for plan review submittal.
Provide precise grading plan for plan check submittal to check for handicap accessibility.
A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the
building construction.
Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standard and any block walls if not on the approved
building plans, will require separate approvals and permits.
Show all building setbacks.
Signage sha be posted conspicuously at the entrapce to the project that indicates the hours
of construction, shown below, as allowed by the C'~[ty of Temecula Ordinance No. 0-90-04,
specifically Section G (1) of Riverside County Ordinance No. 457.73, for any site within one-
quarter mile of an occupied residence.
Monday-Friday
Saturday
46.
R:\D P~2001\01-0187 Inland Valley Terrace Investment Group\Staff
14
6:30 ~.m. - 6:30 p.m.
7:00 ~.m. - 6:30 p.m.
No work is permitted on Sunday or Government Holidays
FIRE DEPARTMENT
45. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addre sed when the Fire Prevention Bureau
reviews building plans. These conditions will be b~sed on occupancy; use, the California
Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), ~nd related codes, which are in force at
the time of building, plan submittal.
The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a, minimum fire flow for the remodel or
construction of all commercial buildings per CFC Appendix III.A, Table A-III-A-1. The
Report.doc
developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 1500 GPM at
20-PSi residual operating pressure, plus an assumed sprinkler demand of 400 GPM for a
total fire flow of 1900 GPM with a 2-hour duration. The required fire flow may be adjusted
during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire
protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire Flow as given
above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC 903.2, Appendix Ill-A)
47. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC
Appendix Ill-B, Table A-III-B-1. A minimum of I hydrant, in a combination of on-site and off-
site (6" x 4" x 2-2 1/2" outlets) shall be located on Fire Department access roads and
adjacent public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 500 feet apart, at each intersection and
shall be located no more than 250 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department
access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any
adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required.
(CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix Ill-B)
48. As required by the California Fire Code, when any portion of the facility is in excess of 150
feet from a water supply on a public street, as measured by an approved route around the
exterior of the facility, on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire
flow shall be provided. For this project on site fire hydrants are required. (CFC 903.2)
49. If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection prior
to any building construction. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2)
50. Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have
approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent roads
are installed. Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface for
80,000 lbs. GVW. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2)
51. Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved Fire
Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or any
portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be an all
weather surface designed for 80,000 lbs. GVW with a minimum AC thickness of .25 feet.
(CFC sec 902)
52. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than
twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13)
feet six (6) inches. (CFC 902.2.2.1)
53. The gradient for fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed fifteen (15) percent. (CFC
902.2.2.6 Rod. 99-14)
54. Prior to building construction, dead end roadways and streets in excess of one hundred and
fifty (150) feet which have not bee~n completed shall have a turnaround capable of
accommodating fire apparatus. (CFC 902.2.2.4)
55. Prior to building construction, this development shall have two (2) points of access, via all-
weather surface roads, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 902.2.1)
58. Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water
system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall be
signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature
block; and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. After
the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be presented to the Fire
Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system including fire hydrants shall be
R'.~D P',2.001\01-0187 Inland Valley Terrace Investment Group\Staff Report.doc 15
57.
58.
59.
60.
61.
62.
63.
installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency pdor to any combustible building
materials being placed on an individual lot. (CFC 8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and National Fire
Protection Association 24 1-4.1 )
Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective Markers"
shaft be installed to identify fire hydrant locations. (CFC 901.4.3)
Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final approved numbers or
addresses shal be provded on a new and exst~r~g buddings in such a position as to be
plainly visible and legible from the street or road fro~tmg the property. Numbers shall be of a
contrasting color to their background. Commercial, multi-family residential and industrial
bu~ dings sha have a re'ri'mum twelve (12) riches humbers w~th suite numbers a m n'mum
of six (6) inches in size. All suites shall have a m~mum of slx (6) ~nch high letters and/or
numbers on both the front and rear doors. Single-family residences and multi-family
resident a units shall have four (4) nch letters and/or numbers, as approved by the F re
Prevention Bureau. (CFC 901.4.4)
Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on square footage and
type of construction, occupancy or use, the developer shall 'nstall a fire sprinkler system.
Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to
installation. (CFC Article 10, CBC Chapter 9)
Pr or to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final based on a requirement for
monitoring the sprinkler system, occupancy or use! the developer shall install an fire alarm
' ' h
system mon tored by an approved Underwriters Laboratory hsted central station. Plans s all
be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for app~val prior to installation. (CFC Article 10)
i
Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy~ or building final, a "Knox-Box" shall be
provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six (6) feet in height and be located
to the right side of the main entrance door. (CFC 9'02 4)
I ates
All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or g
obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry
system for emergency access by fire fight ng pers0nne. (CFC 902.4)
Prior to final inspection of any building, the applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire
Department for approval, a site plan designating Fire Lanes with appropriate lane painting
and or signs.
Special Conditions
64.
65.
Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy oI building final a simple plot plan and a
simple floor plan, each as an electronic file of the .DWG format must be submitted to the
~ I
Fire Prevention Bureau. Alternative file formats may be acceptab e, contact fire prevention
for approval.
The applicant shall comply with the requirement of the Fire Code permit process and
update any changes ~n the items and quanbt~es approved as part of the r F re Code permit.
These changes shall be submitted to the F~re Preve~ntion Bureau for rev'ew and approval per
the Fire Code and is subject to inspection. (CFC 105)
R:\D P~2001\01-0187 Inland Valley Terrace Investment Group\Staff Report.doc
16
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
66.
Unless otherwise noted, all conditions shall be completed by the Developer at no cost to any
Government Agency. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the site plan all
existing and proposed property lines, easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints
and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for
further review and revision.
General
67.
68.
69.
Requirements
A Grading Permit for either rough and/or precise grading, including all on-site flat work and
improvements, shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained street right-of-way.
An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way.
All improvement plans and grading plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent
projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on
standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars.
Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit
70. Tentative Parcel Map 28473 shall be approved.
71. A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed and
approved by the Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include all necessary
erosion control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and private property.
72. The Grading Plan shall show reconfigured joint driveways. The center landscape islands are
not acceptable. The driveways shall be of adequate length (i.e., approximately 110 feet in
length) to allow for safe queing.
73. The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and
erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to
approval by the Department of Public Works.
74. A Soil Report shall be prepared by a registered Soil or Civil Engineer and submitted to the
Director of the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report
shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the
construction of engineered structures and pavement sections.
75. A Geological Report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted to
the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address
special study zones and the geological conditions of the site, and shall provide
recommendations to mitigate the impact of ground shaking and liquefaction.
76. The Developer shall have a Drainage Study prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in
accordance with City Standards identifying storm water runoff expected from this site and
upstream of this site. The study shall identify all existing or proposed public or private
drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. The study shall also analyze and identify
impacts to downstream properties and provide specific recommendations to protect the
properties and mitigate any impacts. Any upgrading or upsizing of downstream facilities
including acquisition of drainage or access easements necessary to make req
improvements, shall be provided by the Developer.
R:\D P'~2001\01-0187 Inland Valley Terrace Investment Group\Staff Report.doc
77.
78.
The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the Sta{e Water Resources Control Board. No
grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notic~ of Intent (NOI) has been filed or the
project is shown to be exempt. /
As deemed necessary by the Director of the DepaIrtment of Public Works, the Developer
shall receive written clearance from the following ~gencies:
79.
80.
ao
81.
San Diego Regional Water Quality Contra
Riverside County Flood Control and Water
Planning Department
Department of Public Works
Prior to Issuance of e Building Permit
82.
Board
Conservation District
83.
84.
The Developer shall comply with all constrai~ts, which may be shown upon an
Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded ,~,ith any underlying maps related to the
subject property.
Permanent landscape and irrigation plans shall bE submitted to the Planning Department
and the Department of Public Works for review an approval.
The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters ol approval or slope easements for off-site
work pedormed on adjacent properties as directec by the Department of Public Works.
A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Am Drainage Plan fee is payable to the
R~vers~de County Flood Control and Water Conservation D~stnct by e~ther cashier's check or
money order, prior to issuance of permits, based onlthe prevailing area drainage plan fee. If
the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been credited to this
property, no new charge needs to be paid.
Parcel Map 28473 shall be approved and recorded.
t I ' ' I I h II f t I bi "' f
Improvemen pans ano/or precise gra(3ing pans s a con orm o app ica e L;ity o
Temecula Standards subject to approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works.
The following design criteria shall be observed:
a. Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum ove'r P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over A.C.
paving. I
b. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula Standard No. 207A.
c. Streetlights shall be installed along the publi ,c streets adjoining the site in accordance
with City Standard No. 800, 801,802 and 803.
d. Concrete sidewalks and ramps shall be con,structed along public street frontages in
accordance with City of Temecula Standard Nos. 400, 401 and 402.
e. Improvement plans shall extend 300 feet beyond the project boundaries.
f. Minimum centerline radii shall be in accordance with City of Temecula s Standard
No. 113. ~m
g. All reverse curves shall include a 100-foot inimum tangent section.
h. All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees.
i. Public Street improvement plans shall include plan and profile showing existing
topography utd~bes, proposed centerhne, top of curb and flow line grades.
R:\D F~2001\01-0187 nland Valley Terrace Investment Group\Staff Report°doc
18
j. Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and
adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility.
k. All concentrated drainage directed towards the public street shall be conveyed
through under sidewalk drains.
85. The Developer shall construct the following public improvements to City of Temecula
General Plan standards or have plans submitted and approved. Plans shall be reviewed
and approved by the Director of the Department of Public Works:
a. Improve Western By-Pass Corridor (Secondary Highway Standards - 88' PJW) from
the most southerly boundary of the site to Roick Drive to include dedication of half-
width street right-of-way, installation of half-width street improvements, paving, curb
and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities
(including but not limited to water and sewer).
b. Improve Roick Drive (Principal Collector Highway Standards - 78' RNV) to include
dedication of half-width street right-of-way plus six feet, installation of half-width
street improvements plus six feet, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights,
drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and
sewer).
86. All street improvement design shall provide adequate right-of-way and pavement transitions
per Caltran's standards for transition to existing street sections.
87. The Developer shall construct the following public improvements in conformance with
applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Director of the Department of
Public Works.
a. Street improvements, which may include, but not limited to: pavement, curb and
gutter, medians, sidewalks, drive approaches, street lights, signing, striping, traffic
signal systems, and other traffic control devices as appropriate
b. Storm drain facilities
¢. Sewer and domestic water systems
d. Under grounding of proposed utility distribut!on lines
88. All access rights, easements for sidewalks for public uses shall be submitted and reviewed
by the Director of the Department of Public Works and City Attorney and approved by City
Council for dedication to the City where sidewalks meander through private property.
89. The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance with
the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered Civil Engineer, and the Soil Engineer
shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions.
90. The Developer shall obtain/grant an easement/agreement for ingress and egress over the
adjacent properties. Reciprocal access and parking agreements between parcels providing
access and parking to each other shall be processed and recorded.
91. The Developer shall pay to the City' the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as
required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all
Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06.
92. The Developer shall record a written offer to participate in, and waive all rights to object to
the formation of an Assessment District, a Community Facilities District, or a Bridge and
Major Thoroughfare Fee District for the construction of the proposed Western Bypass
R:\D P~2001\01-0187 inland Valley Terrace investment Group\Staff Report.doc
19
Corridor in accordance with the General Plan. ThE form of the offer shall be subject to the
approval of the City Engineer and City Attorney.
Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy
93. The Developer shall construct the following pub!lc improvements to City of Temecula
General Plan standards unless otherwise noted. Plans shall be reviewed and approved by
the Director of the Department of Public Works:
a. improve Western By-Pass Corridor (Secon ~dary Highway Standards - 88' R/VV) from
the most southerly boundary of the site to Roick Drive to include dedication of half-
width street right-of-way, installation of half-~vidth street improvements, paving, curb
and gutter, sidewa k, street I~ghts, drainage fac~hbes, signing and striping, utilities
(includ,ng but not limited to water and sewer).
b. Improve Roick Drive (Principal Collector Highway Standards - 78' R/W) to include
dedication of half-width street right-of-way~ plus six feet, installation of half-width
street improvements plus six feet, paving, ,curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights,
sewer).drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilit es (including but not limited to water and
94. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
a. Rancho California Water District
b. Eastern Municipal Water District
c. Department of Public Works
95. All public improvements shall be constructed and :ompleted per the approved plans and
City standards to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works.
96. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall
be repaired or removed and replaced to the sabsfacbon of the D~rector of the Department of
Public Works.
OTHER AGENCIES
97. The applicant shall comply with all comments and/or conditions set forth in the attached
letter from the United States Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service dated May
3, 2001.
98. The applicant shall comply with all comments and/or conditions set forth in the attached
letter from Metropolitan Water D~stnct of Southern ~Cal~forn~a dated May 1,2001.
By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read,Bunderstand, and accept all the above
Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the prope;rty shall be maintained in conformance
with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be
subject to Community Development Department approval.I
Applicant Name
R:\D P~001\01-0187 Inland Valley Terrace Investment Group\Staff Report.doc
2O
United States Department of the Interior
Fish and Wildlife Service
Ecological Services
Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife Office
2730 Loker Avenue Wesrz .......................
Carlsbad, California 92008
In Reply Refer To:
FWS-WRIV- 1742.1
Rolfe Preisendanz
City of Temecula Planning Department
Post Office Box 9033
Temecula, California 92589-9033
Re~
PA01-0187, APN 909-320-048, Inland Valley Terrace Investment Group, City of
Temecula, Riverside County, California
Dear Mr. Preisendanz:
We have reviewed PA01-0187, APN 909-320-048, Inland Valley Terrace Investment Group,
located in the City of Temecula, Riverside County, California, and received in our office on April
23, 2001. We offer the following comments and recommendations on the biological resources
that could be affected by the proposed project based on our knowledge of sensitive and declining
species and habitat types in Riverside County.
We are concerned about "take" of federally listed species protected under the Endangered
Species Act of 1973 (Act), as amended. Section 9 of the Act prohibits the take of any federally
listed species by any person subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. Take includes
"harass" and "harm," as defined by section 3 of the Act. Harass, in the definition of take, means
"an intentional or negligent act or omission which creates the likelihood of injury to wildlife by
annoying it to such an extent as to significantly disrupt normal behavioral patterns which include,
but are not limited to, breeding, feeding, or sheltering." Harm in the definition of take in the Act
means "an act which actually kills or injures wildlife. Such an act may include significant habitat
modification or degradation where it actually kills or injures wildlife by significantly impairing
essential behavioral patterns, including breeding, feeding or sheltering." (see 50 CFR § 17.3).
Take incidental to an otherwise lawful activity may be authorized under sections 7 or 10 of the
Act.
The proposed project is the construction and operation of a 55,697 square foot Executive Office
Building on 3.65 acres of vacant land within the Westside Business Centre. The proposed
project site is located east of the Western Bypass and west of Via Industria (parcel 1 of PM
28084 and parcel 4 of TPM 28473). This area is known to support habitat for the federally
endangered Quino checkerspot butterfly (Euphydryas editha quino, "quino"), threatened coastal
California gnatcatcher (Polioptila californica californica, "gnatcatcher"), and least Bell's vireo
(Vireo bellii pusillusi, "vireo"). Populations of gnatcatchers and vireo have been documented in
Rolfe Preisendanz (FWS-WRIV-1742.1)
the immediate vicinity of the proposed site; populations of
one and one-half mile of the proposed project site. If coas
grasses, clay soils, or vernal pools occur on the proposed p
listed species. We recommend that focused surveys be col
2
Quino have been documented within
al sage scrub, wetlands, native
roject site, then the site may support
ducted by a permitted biologist within
suitable habitat on site pr/or to final project approval and any ground disturbing activities. If
federally hsted species are present on the proposed project site, take authorization pursuant to the
Act will be required before the project can proceed.
This area is also known to support habitat for the federally endangered Stephens' kangaroo rat
(Dipodomys stephenst). The proposed project occurs w~thm the boundary of the Stephens
Kangaroo Rat Habitat Conservation Plan for Western R~vers~de County. Compliance with the
regional incidental take permit will be required prior to an~ ground disturbing activities.
If wetlands or Waters of the U.S. are affected by the proposed project, a U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers section 404 permit and/or California Departmenl offish and Game 1600 permit may
I .
be required. We recommend that impacts to coastal sage scrub or any other sensitive resource be
I .
considered cumulatively significant under the California Enwronmental Quality Act and
mitigated prior to any ground disturbing activities.
Please clarify the discrepencies between the Assessors Parcel Number (APN) and gross acreage
indicated on the Site Plan map, and the APN and gross acreage documented in the City of
Temecula's Planning Department Development Review Co~mmittee - Project Transmittal. It is
unclear why these numbers vary between the documents.
Since~ly,
~Jeff M. ~ewman
CC:
Actin
Assistant Field Supervisor
Jeff Drongesen (CDFG, Chino)
Jerry Jolliffe/Richard Lashbrook (County of River: ale)
MWD
METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
Office of the General Manager
May l, 2001
Mr. Rolfe Preisendanz
City of Teraecula
Planning Department
PO Box 9033
Temecula, California 92589-9033
Dear Mr. Preisendanz:
Development Review for an
Initial Study for the Inland Valley Terrace Business Center
The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Metropolitan) has received a Preliminapj
Site Plan of the Inland Valley Terrace Business Center in the City of Temecula (City)-The
applicant, Edge Development, Inc., proposes the design, construction, and operation of a 55,697
square foot Executive Office Building on 3.24 acres of vacant land within the Westside Business
Centre. This letter contains our response as a potentially affected public agency.
Our review of the Notice indicates that no Metropolitan facilities exist in the vicinity of the
proposed project area.
Metropolitan requests that the City analyze the consistency of the proposed project with the
growth management plan adopted by the Southern Califc, rv. ia Association of Governments
(SCAG). Metropolitan uses SCAG's population, housing and employment projections to
determine future water demand. Development above these forecast provisions may increase
demand on Metropolitan's resources and facilities beyond that anticipated.
Additionally, Metropolitan encourages projects within its service area to include water
conservation measures. Water conservation, reclaimed water use, and groundwater recharge
programs are integral components to regional water supply planning. Metropolitan supports
mitigation measures such as using water efficient fixtures, drought-tolerant landscaping, and
reclaimed water to offset any increase in water use associated with the proposed project.
700 N. Alameda Street. Los Angeles. California 90012 * Mailing address: Box 54153. Los Angeles, California 90054-0153 o Telephone (213) 217-t5000
Mr. Rolfe Preisendanz
Page 2
May 1, 2001
We appreciate the opportunity to provide input to your pi
receiving future environmental documentation on this proj
please contact me at (213) 217-6242.
Very truly yours,
Laura J. Simonek
Principal Environmental Specialist
DTF
bcc: N.N. Flette
G.L. Johnson
W.M. Lieu
T.E. Tellers
K.M. Callanan
S.M. Walters
D.W. Shane
D.T. Feremenga
CRG Files
uming process and we look forward to
ect. If we can be of further assistance,
ATFACHMENT NO,
EXtflBITS
R:\D P~2001\01-0187 Inland Valley Terrace In~,.,stment Group\Staff Report.doc
21
ClTY OFTEMECU~A
ect Site
CASE NO. - PA01-0187
EXHIBIT - A
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE- September 5, 2001
VICINITY MAP
R:~D P~2001~01-0187 Inland Valtey Terrace Investment Group,Staff Report.doc
22
CITY OF TEMECULA
ect Site
EXHIBIT B - ZONING MAP
DESIGNATION -(LI) LIGHT INDUSTRIAL
Site
EXHIBIT C - GENERAL PLAN
DESIGNATION -~.~_.BUSINESS PARK
CASE NOS. - PA01-0187
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - September 5, 2001
R:~D p~_001~01-0187 Intanci Valley Te~ace Invesb-nent Group,Staff Repo~l.doc
23
CITY OF TEMECUI .A
-- SITE PLAN
~s~B~I ~
CASE NO. - PA01-0187
EXHIBIT- D
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - September 5,2001
SITE PLAN
R:~.D P~2.001~1-0187 Inland Valley Terrace Investment Group,Staff Report.doc
24
ClTY OFTEMECULA
PLANNING COM.~MISSION DATE - September 5, 2001 ' ~J
R:~D P~2.001~01-0187 Intand Valley Terrace investment Group'Staff Report.doc
25
CITY OF TEMECUL~A
TEXT/DATA
ELEVATIONS
CASE NO. - PA01-0187
EXHIBIT- F
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - September 5, 2001
ELEVATIONS
R:~D P~2001~1-0187 Inland Valley Terrace Investment Group,Staff Report.doc
26
CITY OFTEMECULA
TEXT/DATA
ELEVATIONS
CASE NO. - PA01-0187
EXHIBIT - G ELEVATIONS
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE -September 5, 2001
R:~D P~2001~01-0187 Intand Valley Terrace Inves~ent Group\Staff Report.doc
27
CITY OFTEMECULA
TEXT/DATA
..._,.._..
FIRST FLOOR PLAN
CASE NO. - PA01-0187
EXHIBIT - H
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE -September 5, 2001
FLOOR PLANS
R:~D P~2001~1-0187 Inland Valley Terrace Investment Group,Staff Report.doc
28
CITY OF TEMECULA
T E XT/DATA
SECOND FLOOR PLaN ,~,.4 ~1
CASE NO. - PA01-0187
EXHIBIT - I
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE -September 5, 2001
FLOOR
R:~D P~2.001~D1-0187 Intand Valley Terrace Investment Group,Staff Report.doc
29
CITY OF TEMECUL~A
CASE NO. - PA01-0187
EXHIBIT - J LANDSCAPE PLANS
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - September 5, 2001
R:~D P~001~01-0187 Inland Valley Terrace Investment Group,Staff Report.doc
30