HomeMy WebLinkAbout97-045 CC ResolutionRESOLUTION NO. 97-4~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING AND IMPOSING A
PUBLIC FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE
~ CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA HEREBY FINDS,
RESOLVES, DECLARES, DETERMINES AND ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:
gection !. ghort Title. This resolution may be referred to as the "Public Facilities
Development Impact Fee Resolution" of the City of Temecula.
Section 2. lh~rpose. The purpose of this resolution is to establish the amount of the
public facilities development impact fee and to establish certain standards for the administration
of such fees.
Section 3. Findiagq. The City Council, after review of the City of Temecula
Development Impact Fee Study (the "DIF Study") dated January 8, 1996 and prepared by David
M. Griffith & Associates, Ltd., and after review of additional staff reports, and testimony and
information received at a noticed public hearing on this matter, makes the following findings:
A. Based upon the land uses permitted by the City's General Plan and growth trends of
actual development within the City, the City anticipates that 54,422 dwelling units and 55.526
million square feet of non-residential development will be developed in the City between 1995 and
buildout.
B. The DIF Study analyzes the demand expected to be generated by future development
for street system, park and recreation, corporate, fire protection, and library facilities. Based on
this analysis, the DIF Study contains estimated levels of service for street system, park and
recreation, corporate, fire protection, and library facilities that are necessary to serve anticipated
development within the City of Temecula through buildout.
C. Present and future sources of Federal, State, County and City revenues are insufficient
to fund construction of the street system, park and recreation, corporate, fire protection, and
library facilities needed to accommodate the demands of anticipated residential and non-residential
development.
D. The only fair and equitable method of securing adequate revenue necessary to fund the
construction of these facilities is through a fee based on the extent to which new development
generates add'ffional demand for street system, park and recreation, corporate, fire protection, and
library facilities. The fee amounts established in this resolution pursuant to the requirements of
Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code are based on the DIF Study.
E. The purpose of the public facilities development impact fee will be to provide street
system, park and recreation, corporate, fire protection, and library facilities in an amount
sufficient to meet the estimated demand created by residential and non-residential development
constructed in the City through buildout.
F. The public facilities development impact fee will be used to finance the public facilities
listed in the City's Capital Improvement Plan.
G. There is a reasonable relationship between the need for a public facilities development
impact fee and the construction of residential and non-residential development projects because
the construction of these development projects creates a demand for street system, park and
recreation, corporate, fire protection, and library facilities to serve the needs of the residents and
occupants of these development projects. Such facilities are necessary to facilitate ingress to and
egress from each development project, to provide necessary amenities to the residents and
occupants of each development project, and to protect the structures constructed as part of each
development project.
H. There is a reasonable relationship between the use of the public facilities development
impact fee and the construction of residential and non-residential development projects because,
as a result of the fees' use as described in subsection F, residents and occupants of such
development projects will be served by the street system, park and recreation, corporate, fire
protection, and library facilities that will be financed by the fees.
I. There is a reasonable relationship between the amount of the public facilities
development impact fee and the portion of the total cost of street system, park and recreation,
corporate, fire protection, and library facilities attributed to each development project because the
amount of the public facilities development impact fee was carefully calculated so that the
estimated share of the total cost of the facilities assessed to a development project would equal the
estimated share of the total demand for the facilities generated by that development project. The
general methodology for apportioning the total cost of facilities, and the method for calculating
the portion of the total cost of facilities attributed to each development project is described in the
DIF Study, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Section 4. Amonnt of the lh,blic Facilities Development Impact Fee. The public
facilities development impact fee is hereby established and imposed in the amounts set forth in
Exhibit A to this resolution.
Section 5. Antomatic Adjn~tments in Amonnt of Fees for Residential Development.
Commencing on January 1, 1998, the fees as established and imposed by this resolution shall be
adjusted on January 1 of each year based upon the Dodge Building Cost Index (the "BCI") for the
Los Angeles Metropolitan Area (BCI) unless the fees are otherwise adjusted as part of an update
of the City's Capital Improvement Plan. The Director of Finance shall compute the percentage
Resos 9745 2
difference between the BCI on July 1 of each year and the BCI for the previous July 1. The
Director of Finance shall then adjust by such percentage the fees established and imposed by this
resolution. The adjusted amounts shall be rounded to the nearest dollar, and shall be submitted
to the City Council for consideration at a public hearing. Upon adoption by the City Council, the
adjusted amounts shall become effective on the following January 1. These amounts shall
constitute the fees authorized by Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and established
and imposed by this resolution. Should the BCI be revised or discontinued, the Director of
Finance shall use the revised index or a comparable index, as approved by the City Council, for
determining fluctuations in the cost of development.
Section 6. Automatic Adju~ments in Amount of Fees for Non-Residential
Development. Commencing on July 1, 1998, and on each succeeding July 1 until July 1, 2003,
the fees as established and imposed by this resolution for non-residential development shall be
increased in accordance with the schedule set forth in Exhibit B to this resolution. The adjusted
amounts shall be presented to the City Council for review at a public hearing. These adjusted
amounts shall constitute the fees authorized by Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code
and established and imposed by this resolution.
Section 7. Effective Date. The fees established pursuant to Section 4 of this Resolution
shall become effective 60 days following the adoption of Ordinance No. 97-09.
~e~ction 8. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion
of this resolution is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a decision of a court
of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not effect the validity of the remaining portions of
the resolution. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this resolution, and
each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that
any one of more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases or portions be declared invalid
or unconstitutional.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula
this 13th day of May, 1997.
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Patricia H B~rdsall, Mayor
Resos 97-45 3
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that
Resolution No. 9745 was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula
at a regular meeting thereof held on this 13th day of May, 1997, by the following vote:
AYF~:
4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Ford, Lindemarts, Roberts, Birdsall
NOES:
1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Stone
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
/June S. G~eek, CI~C/AAE
~ ~ity Clerk
Re,os 9745 4
EXHIBIT A
PUBLIC FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES
Component
Type of Land Use~/
Amount of Fee Per Unit2~
Street System
Improvements
Residential (Attached)
Residential (Detached)
Office
Retail Commercial
Service Commercial
Business Park/Industrial
$511
$729
$0.682
$2.099
$1.049
$0.498
Traffic Signals and
Traffic Control
Systems
Residential (Attached)
Residential (Detached)
Office
Retail Commercial
Service Commercial
Business Park/Industrial
$77
$109
$0.103
$0.316
$0.158
$0.075
Corporate Facilities
Residential (Attached)
Residential (Detached)
Office
Retail Commercial
Service Commercial
Business Park/Industrial
$118
$222
$0.035
$0.088
$0.049
$0.029
Fire Protection
Facilities
Residential (Attached)
Residential (Detached)
Office
Retail Commercial
Service Commercial
Business Park/Industrial
$42
$55
$0.010
$0.017
$0.014
$o.o12
Park and Recreation
Improvements
Residential (Attached)
Residential (Detached)
Office
Retail Commercial
Service Commercial
Business Park/Industrial
$1,209
$1,611
$0
$0
$0
$0
1/ Land use is determined based on the categories in the Land Use Element of the Temecula
General Plan.
2/ Fees for residential development are calculated per dwelling unit. Fees for non-residential
development are calculated per square foot of gross building area.
Resos 97-45 5
Corrk9onent
Libraries
Type of ! .~nd Use3/
Residential (Attached)
Residential (Detached)
Office
Retail Commercial
Service Commercial
Business Park/Industrial
Amount of Fee Per Unit~t
$156
$208
$0
$0
$0
$0
IMPACT FEE PER
vNrr"
TOTAl, I)EVEII3PMlZ, NT Residential (Attached)
Residential (Detached)
Office
Retail Commercial
Service Commercial
Business Park/Industrial
$2,113
$2,934
$0.830
$2.520
$1.270
$0.614
2[/ Land use is determined based on the categories in the Land Use Element of the Temecula
General Plan.
t/ Fees for residential development are calculated per dwelling unit. Fees for non-residential
development are calculated per square foot of gross building area.
Rcaoa 9745 6
EXHIBIT B
PUBLIC FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES
FOR RESIDENTIAL AND NON-RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
STREET SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS
BASE
FEE*
1997/98 1998/99 1999/00 2000/01 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 2004/05
RESIDENTIAL DETACHED 729
RESIDENTIAL ATTACHED 511
729 729 729 729 729 729 729 729
511 511 511 511 511 511 511 51l
NON-RESIDENTIAL (60%)
OFFICE I. 137 0.682
RETAIL COMM 3.498 2.099
SERVICE COMM 1.749 1.049
BUS PARK/IND 0,830 0.498
(70%) (8o%) (90%) (100%) (110%) (120%) (130%)
0.796 0.910 1.023 1.137 1.251 1.364 0.887
2.449 2.798 3.148 3.498 3.848 4.198 2.728
1.224 1.399 1.574 1.749 1.924 2.099 !.364
0.581 0.664 0.747 0.830 0.913 0.996 0.647
TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEMS
BASE
FEE* 1997/98 1998/99
1999/00 2000/01 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 2004/05
RESIDENTIAL DETACHED 109 109 109 109 109 109 109 109
RESIDENTIAL ATTACHED 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77
)N-RESIDENTIAL (60%) (70%) (80%) (90%) (100%) (110%) (120%)
;FICE 0.171 0.103 0.120 0.137 0.154 0.171 0.188 0.205
~2TAIL COMM 0.527 0.316 0.369 0.422 0.474 0.527 0.580 0.632
SERVICE COMM 0.263 0.158 0.184 0.210 0.237 0.263 0.289 0.316
BUS PARK/IND 0.125 0.075 0.088 0.100 0.113 0.125 0.138 0.150
109
77
(130%)
0.134
O411
0.205
O.098
CORPORATE FACILITIES
BASE
FEE* 1997/98 1998/99 1999/00 2000/01 2001/02
RESIDENTIAL DETACHED 222 222 222 222
RESIDENTIAL ATTACHED 118 i 18 118 118
2002/03
2003/04
2004/05
222 222 222 222 222
118 118 118 118 118
NON-RESIDENTIAL (61)%) (711%) {80%) (90%) (100%) (110%) (121)%) (130%1)
OFFICE t).059 0.035 0.041 0.047 0.053 0.059 0.065 0.071 0.046
RETAIL COMM 0.147 0.088 0.103 0.118 0.132 0.147 0.162 0.176 0.115
SERVICE COMM 0.082 0.049 0.057 0.066 0.074 0.082 0.090 0.098 I).064
BUS PARK/IND 0.(149 0.029 0.034 0.039 0.044 0.049 0.054 0.059 0.038
* Base~/ke ~s 60% of the maxtmumJke calculated in the Development Impact Fee Study conducted
by Davt'd A~( Gr(/fith & Associates, Inc.
r:\kuhnsa\difikarel 1 .wb2\sphere 14-May-97
FIRE PROTECTION FACILITIES
BASE
FEE*
RESIDENTIAL DETACHED
RESIDENTIAL ATTACHED
1997/98 1998/99 1999/00 2000/01 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 2004/05
55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55
42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42 42
NON -RESIDENTIAL (60%)
OFFICE 0.017 0.010
RETAIL COMM 0.028 0.017
SERVICE COMM 0.023 0.014
BUS PARKfiND 0.020 0.012
(70~h (80%) (90%) (100%) (110%) (120%) (130%)
0.012 0.014 0.015 0.017 0.019 0.020 0.013
0.020 (I.022 0.025 0.028 0.031 0.034 0022
0.016 0.018 (}.021 0.023 0.025 0.028 0.018
0.014 0.016 0.018 0.020 0.022 0.024 0.016
PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENTS
BASE
FEE* 1997/98
RESIDENTIAL DETACHED 1.611 1.611
RESIDENTIAL ATTACHED 1,209 1,209
1998/99 1999/00 2000/01 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 2004/05
1,611 1,611 1,611 1.611 1,611 1,611 1.611
1,209 1,209 1,21)9 1,209 1,209 1,209 1,209
NON-RESIDENTIAL
OFFICE 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
RETAIL COMM 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 O000
;ERVICE COMM 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
?US PARKfiND 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
LIBRARIES
BASE
FEE* 1997/98 1998/99 1999/00 2000/01
2001/02
208
156
RESIDENTIAL DETACHED
RESIDENTIAL ATTACHED
208 208 208 208 208
156 156 156 156 156
2002/03
208
156
2003/04
208
156
2004/05
208
156
NON-RESIDENTIAL
OFFICE 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
RETAIL COMM 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
SERVICE COMM 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0000
BUS PARK/IND 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 6.000 0.000
* Base fee is 60% of the maximumJbe calculated in the Development Impacl 1,be Sludy conducted
by David 3/[ GriJfith & Associates, Inc.
r:\kuhnsa\difikare11 .wb2\sphere 14-May-97