HomeMy WebLinkAbout092501 CC MinutesMINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
SEPTEMBER 25, 2001
The City Council convened in Open Session at 7:01 P.M., on Tuesday, September 25, 2001,
in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula,
California.
Present: Councilmembers: Naggar, Pratt, Roberts, Comerchero
Absent: Councilmember: Stone
PRELUDE MUSIC
The prelude music was provided by Mathew Klm and Oliver and Sarah Koughlin.
INVOCATION
The invocation was given by Rabbi Yitzchok Hurwitz of Chabad of Temecula Valley.
ALLEGIANCE
The salute to the Flag was led by Councilman Naggar.
PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS
Fall Rod Run Presentation
In appreciation of the City's continued suppor~ of this event, Mr. Vesey presented to the City a
Plaque of Appreciation; briefly commented on the upcoming event; and distributed event
memorabilia to the Councilmembers.
Fire Prevention Week Presentation
This presentation was continued to the meeting of October 9, 2001.
Boys and Girls Club Presentation
This presentation was continued to the meeting of October 9, 2001.
Annual "Memorv Walk" Awareness and Fundraiser Proclamation
Reading the proclamation into the record, Mayor Comerchero noted that it would be forwarded
to the organization.
Inland Empire Race for the Cure Month Proclamation
Thanking the City Council for its continued support and dedication, Ms. Joan Sparkman, Ms.
Sheila Crane, Race Chair; and Mr. Bruce Cripe, Co-Chair, accepted the proclamation.
R:\Minutes\092501
1
Proud American City Proclamation
In an effort to express national unity and support in light of the September 11,2001, tragedy,
Mayor Comerchero read into the record the Proud American City Proclamation and relayed his
desire that other cities consider proclaiming a similar proclamation.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A. Encouraging continued public support, Mr. Wayne Hall, 27715 Jefferson Street,
representing the American Red Cross, provided a brief update of on-going fundraising efforts in
light of the September 11,200, tragedy.
B. Commenting on the diminishing affects of freedom of speech if abused by an individual
or group of individuals who hire signature gathers to stand in public places and tell lies about
actions of the City Council/Lennar/Harveston, Mr. Ray Becker, 6529 Riverside Avenue, Suite
No. 133, representing Lennar Communities, assured the Council and the public that Lennar
Communities/Harveston will continue to abide by the tenants of the agreement with the City and
continue to move forward with the street improvements, school site improvements, and will
continue to live by the agreement with the City.
C. Mr. David Rosenthal, 27315 Jefferson Street, relayed his support of the Harveston
project.
D. Commenting his dismay with those individuals opposing the Harveston project even
though the developer has adhered to the imposed requirements, Mr. Rodolfo Martinez, 43714
Buckeye Road, relayed his support of the Harveston project.
E. Mr. Ed Dool, 28464 Old Town Front Street, expressed appreciation to the City Council
for its support of the Hot Summer Nights in Old Town, commenting.o.n the citizenry participation
and invited the public to the upcoming Rod Run event in Old Town.
F. Quoting Mayor Comerchero in a recent letter published in the Californian, Mrs. May
Lorah, 35555 Monte De Crc, noted that although she may not live in the City of Temecula,
Mayor Comerchero's election committee still invited her to participate in his reelection fundraiser
and advised that she shops in the City and that her children attend the Temecula Valley Unified
School District.
G. Ms. Tomi Arbogast, 27450 Ynez Road, representing the Temecula Valley Chamber of
Commerce, encouraged the public to exercise its right to vote, commenting on the importance
of the upcoming election; invited the public to watch a Chamber Candidates' Forum on
Wednesday, October 10, 2001, and advised that the last day to register to vote will be Monday,
October 22, 2001.
H. As a senior citizen of this community, Ms. Joan Tussine, 28165 Jefferson Street, noted
that she would be proud to live in the Harveston project; relayed her opposition to the
derogatory slurs with regard to this project; and expressed dismay with the viciousness that
Councilman Stone has been subjected to as a result of his support of this project.
I. At this time, City Clerk Jones distributed to the City Council a letter from Ms. Pamela
Miod.
R:\Minutes\092501
2
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
A. In response to Mr. Hall's comment, Mayor Comerchero thanked City Manager Nelson
and staff for their efforts associated with obtaining the updated equipment at Fire Station No. 73,
noting that the equipment will be purchased.
Mr. Comerchero advised that the American Red Cross raised $14,000 toward the
September 11, 2001, tragedy, proudly noting that of those fundraising efforts, $1,708.751 were
raised by City Hall employees and commenting on everybody's efforts to assist with this
tragedy.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Standard Ordinance and Resolution Adoption Procedure
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the
agenda.
2 Resolution approvinq List of Demands
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO, 01-83
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS
AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
3 Minutes
4
5
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Approve the minutes of July 17, 2001.
Comment Letter on the Riverside County Circulation Element
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Approve the comment letter for transmittal to the Riverside County Transportation
Commission.
Comment Letter on the Domeni(:~oni-Barton Specific Plan No. 310
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 Approve the comment letter for transmittal to the Riverside County Planning
Commission.
R:\Minutes\092501
3
6 Acceptance of an Easement Deed for a Meanderinq Sidewalk alonq Winchester Road with
9ortions within Parcel No. 13 of Parcel Map No. 21383 (located near the southwest corner
of Winchester Road and Diaz Road)
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 01-84
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT DEED FOR A
MEANDERING SIDEWALK ALONG WINCHESTER ROAD WITH
PORTIONS WITHIN PARCEL NO. 13 OF PARCEL MAP NO.
21383 AS REQUIRED PER THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
FOR PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0409
7 Acceptance of Jeffrey Heiqhts Road and a portion of Calle Girasol into the City-Maintained
Street System within Parcel Map No. 14493 (located On the north side of Calle G¢rasol
and east of Riverton Lane)
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 01-85
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ACCEPTING JEFFREY HEIGHTS ROAD AND A
PORTION OF CALLE GIRASOL INTO THE CITY-MAINTAINED
STREET SYSTEM (WITHIN PARCEL MAP NO. 14493)
8 Parcel MaD No. 29406 (located on the south side of Enterprise Cimle West at the Knuckle}
RECOMMENDATION:
8,1 Approve Parcel Map No. 29406 in conformance with the conditions of approval;
8.2 Approve the Subdivision Improvement Agreement and accept the Faithful
Performance and Labor and Materials Bond as security for the agreement;
8.3 Approve the Subdivision Monument Agreement and accept the Monument Bond as
security for the agreement.
9 Request to increase continqenc¥ for Professional Services Aqreement - Rancho California
Road Bridqe Wideninq over Murrieta Creek- Proiect No. PW99-18
RECOMMENDATION:
9.1 Authorize the City Manager to approve contract changes with T.Y. Lin International
for an additional amount of $35,000 above the previously approved 10%
contingency for the Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Project.
R:\Minutes\092501
4
(Pulled for separate discussion; see pages 6-7.)
10 Purchase of City Equipment
RECOMMENDATION:
10.1 Approve the purchase of the vibratory roller and equipment trailer from Ingersoll-
Rand Equipment Sales for $26,916.93.
11 Completion and Acceptance of the Pala Road Bridqe Soundwall Proiect - Proiect No. PW97-
15SW
RECOMMENDATION:
11.1 Accept the Pala Road Bridge Soundwall Project - Project No. PW97-15SW - as
complete;
11.2 File a Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a one-year
Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract;
11.3 Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven months after filing o1 the Notice of
Completion, if no liens have been filed.
12 Request to Desiqnate Certain Property as No Skateboardinch Rollerbladincl or Similar
Activitv Area
RECOMMENDATION:
12.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 01-86
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA DESIGNATING PRIVATE PROPERTY AT 28820
AND 28835 SINGLE OAK DRIVE AS A NO SKATEBOARDING,
ROLLERBLADING OR SIMILAR ACTIVITY AREA PURSUANT
TO CHAPTER 10.36 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE
13 Interim Fire Station Work Plan - Proiect No. PW01-21
RECOMMENDATION:
13.1 Approve the location of the Vail Ranch Interim Fire Station;
13.2 Approve an appropriation of $562,000 from the General Fund Unreserved Fund
Balance for Fire Department staffing costs for the interim station.
R:\Minutes\092501
5
14 Interim Fire Station Residential Facility
RECOMMENDATION:
14.1 Approve the purchase of the residential module interim Fire Station from San Diego
Manufactured Housing Company for a total amount of $34,240.00.
MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Roberts moved to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1 - 8 and
10 - 14 (Item No. 9 was pulled for separate discussion; see pages 6-7). The motion was
seconded by Councilman Naggar and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of
Councilman Stone who was absent.
CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM CONSIDERED UNDER SEPARATE DISCUSSION
9
Request to increase continqencv for Professional Services Aqreement - Rancho
California Road Bridqe Wideninq over Murrieta Creek - Proiect No. PW99-18
RECOMMENDATION:
9.1
Authorize the City Manager to approve contract changes with T.Y. Lin
International for an additional amount of $35,000 above the previously approved
10% contingency for the Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Project.
Public Works Director Hughes reviewed the staff report (of record), noting, for Councilman
Naggar, that 60% to 70% of the structural design of the new bridge widening has been
completed and that stopping the project, at this point in time, would compromise monies already
expended on the project.
Noting that roads do not solve the traffic problem, Councilman Pratt stated that other
alternatives other than widening bridges need to be explored such as public transportation.
Although he would not necessarily favor stopping the project, he would not favor expending
more money toward the project.
Because of the geotechnical investigation and in order to protect the existing bridge, Mayor Pro
Tern Roberts indicated that additional monies are necessary.
MOTION: Councilman Naggar moved approve Consent Calendar Item No. 9. The motion was
seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Roberts and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of
Councilman Pratt who voted n_9o and Councilman Stone who was absent.
At 7:47 P. M., the City Council convened as the Temecula Community Services District and the
Temecula Redevelopment Agency and affer a recess, resumed, at 8:16 P.M., with regularly
scheduled City Council business.
PUBLIC HEARING
15 Development Code Amendment (Plannincl Application No. 01-0120 - non profit- clubs and
Iodqe meetinq halls, compact parkinq spaces, courtesy curbs, temporary siqnaqe,
minimum lot area, and commercial buildina offsets)
RECOMMENDATION:
15.1 introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled:
R:\Minutes\092501
6
ORDINANCE NO. 01-14
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING CHAPTERS 8 AND 17 OF THE
TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE TO MAKE TYPOGRAPHICAL
AND OTHER MINOR CHANGES TO THE DEVELOPMENT
CODE
Senior Planner Hogan reviewed the staff report (as per agenda material), advising that the
proposed amendment would be consistent with the City's General Plan.
At this time, Mayor Comemhero opened the public hearing.
Because of incompatibility, Mr. Ron Knowles, 39675 Cantrall Road, representing Nicolas Valley
Preservation Association, relayed his support of the Planning Commission's determination to
not change zoning for lodge halls and social clubs in LowNery Low residential areas.
Relaying his support of the Planning Commission's decision to not allow meeting rooms, lodges,
etc. as well as the Commission's decision with regard to minimum lot areas, Mr. Larry Markham,
41750 Winchester Road, representing MDMA and Los Ranchitos Homeowners Association,
noted that there are still inconsistencies between the General Plan and the Development Code
and, therefore, encouraged the City Council to refer the matter back to the Planning
Commission. In response to Councilman Naggar, Mr. Markham further elaborated on the effect
the proposed action could have on the net and gross lot area.
In response to Mr. Richard Harrison, 40025 Walcott Lane, it was noted that in light of the
Planning Commission's decision to not adopt the proposed changes to allow non-profit clubs
and lodge meeting halls in the Very Low, Low -2, and Low Medium residential zones, the issue
would not be considered by the City Council.
Senior Planner Hogan clarified that the proposed change would create consistency between the
Development Code and the General Plan as to net lot area (the gross project less the portion
used for roads, flood plain areas, etc.)
For Councilman Pratt, Senior Planner Hogan provided clarification regarding Mr. Markham's
request to allow acreage (for streets and roads) which would have to be removed from the
property, and subsequently dedicated. For Councilman Naggar, it was noted that the proposed
amendment would apply to Very Low, hillside residential, and the two Low density areas,
advising that suburban lots are measured by square footage and not acreage.
Deputy City Manager Thornhill noted that the proposed amendment would result in a slightly
lower yield per subdivision, depending on the size of the property.
Mayor Comerchero closed the public hearing.
At this time, City Attorney Thorson introduced Ordinance No. 01-14 by title only.
MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Roberts moved to introduce Ordinance No. 01-14. The motion was
seconded by Councilman Pratt and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of
Councilman Stone who was absent.
R:\Minutes\092501
7
16 Rancho Hiahlands Drive General Plan Amendment (Planninq Application No. PA99-0451)
RECOMMENDATION:
16.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 01-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA DENYING THE AMENDMENT OF THE GENERAL
PLAN LAND USE MAP FOR A LOCATION ON RANCHO
HIGHLANDS DRIVE IDENTIFIED AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL
NO. 944-330-019 (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 99-0451)
Planning Director Ubnoske reviewed the staff report (as per written material), highlighting the
Planning Commission's recommendation to deny the applicant's request to change the General
Plan Land Use Map of the area of discussion to Highway/Tourist Commercial.
At this time, Mayor Comerchero opened the public hearing.
By way of a map, Mr. Anthony Polo, Avalon Consultants, P.O. Box 2497, Temecula,
representing Global Hotel Network, advised that prior to the close of escrow, the current owner
had requested verification from the City of Temecula that the potential use of this site as a hotel
would be permissible since it is zoned Office Professional; that the current owner based his
decision to purchase the property on the information he had received from the City; that the plot
plan for the proposed hotel is now on hold; that two large pads have been graded (one acre in
sige); and that rather than consider this as an application request to change open space to
commercial use, which would increase traffic generation, he requested that the City Council
consider this application with the traffic generation approved under the original Specific Plan.
At this time, Mayor Comerchero closed the public hearing.
Although the Specific Plan is almost built out, Councilman Naggar noted that a Park and Ride
has been indicated in the Specific Plan but has not been built; questioned where a Park and
Ride could be built; and stated that, to his understanding, the property of discussion has been
assessed and taxes have been paid as if it were commercial. In closing, Mr. Naggar noted that
he would not be prepared to vote on this matter.
Concurring with Councilman Naggar, Mayor Pro Tem Roberts questioned whether a one-acre
pad would be sufficient in size for a hotel and parking; as well questioned where the Park and
Ride would be built; and suggested that a traffic study be completed to determine the traffic
generation impacts on Ynez Road as a result of the construction of a hotel.
Councilman Pratt as well addressed the potential traffic impacts as a result of the construction
of a hotel.
Concurring with his fellow colleagues' comments, Mayor Comerchero supported a continuance
in order to further explore the matter as well as the formation of an ad hoc committee and
recommended that Councilman Naggar serve on that committee.
R:\Minutes\092501
8
MOTION: Councilman Naggar moved to continue the matter for 60 days to the November 27,
2001, City Council meeting and to form an ad hoc committee to address the matter (to which
Councilman Naggar was appointed). The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Roberts and
voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Councilman Stone who was absent.
COUNCIL BUSINESS
17 Buttedield Staqe Road/CETAP Corridors
RECOMMENDATION:
17.1 Receive and file report.
Public Works Director Hughes provided the staff report (of record).
Mr. Eric Haley, Executive Director of the Riverside County Transit Commission, informed the
City Council and the viewing public that the Commission had unanimously reinforced an earlier
Commission decision of November 2000 to remove the CETAP Corridors (5A and 5B) from
being considered as preferred alternatives and to emphatically state that these corridors will not
be considered as preferred alternatives, reiterating that these alternatives do not have the
endorsement of the Riverside County Transit Commission and, therefore, funding for such
corridors would not be made available. Because the alternatives are viewed as part of a larger
program to ensure proper review by all associated agencies, Mr. Haley advised that corridors
5A and 5B will continue to be studied by the various agencies. In response to Mayor
Comerchero, Mr. Haley noted that there would be no additional measures necessary on the
City's part to ensure these alternatives will never be viewed as viable options.
Although appreciating Mr. Haley's comments and reassurance that these alternatives will not be
considered, Ms. Michelle Anderson, 43797 Barletta Street, advised that an organization has
been formed by the public (Citizens Against Neighborhood Expressways) to further ensure that
these alternatives will never be viewed as viable and questioned why if these alternatives are
viewed as not viable, why the County continues to expend monies on further studies regard to
them.
Mr. Ed Dool, 28464 Old Town Front Street, as well relayed his opposition to the expressway
but expressed concern with the estimated traffic increase by 2020.
Mr. Carl Ross, 43886 Butternut Road, questioned why the citizens of the City had to apprise the
City Council of these potential routes when Mayor Pro Tem Roberts serves as the Riverside
County Transit Commission liaison, noting that the City should have apprised the residents.
For Mayor Pro Tem Roberts, Mr. Haley commented on how Corridors 5A and 5B were
designated as freeways by the consultants, clarifying that the RCTC had neither endorsed nor
directed this change and stating that he as well as Mayor Pro Tem Roberts were surprised by
the designation.
Relaying his opposition to 5A and 5B, Mayor Pro Tem Roberts requested that the consultant
provide a revised map to the City Council.
To ensure a safe walking route for the children who attend Abby Reinke Elementary School, Ms.
Linda MacDonald, 38925 Calle Breve, requested that a four-way stop at Juarez and Butterfieid
Stage Roads be installed.
R:\Minutes\092501
9
Councilman Naggar suggested that the above-mentioned matter be agendized for the next
School Board/City Council Subcommittee meeting.
Thanking Ms. Miod for her efforts with informing the public, by way of a flier, of the potential of
an expressway, Ms. Diana Hammons, 33375 Fox Road, informed the City Council that she had
received no notices at her home from the County nor the City and relayed her opposition to
these corridors.
Councilman Naggar reiterated that this City Council would not permit the construction of a
freeway and requested that the City Council prepare a resolution of opposition to be forwarded
to the Riverside County Transit Commission. Expressing concern with the County's tendency to
upzone property, Mr. Naggar noted that Alternatives 5A and 5B continue to remain on the
County's Circulation Element, noting that if RCTC has designated them as not viable, why
would the County continue to study the matter.
In response to Councilman Naggar, Public Works Director Hughes noted that Alternatives 5A
and 5B are only reflected on the County's Circulation Element during the planning process to
ensure other resource agencies have properly reviewed all alternatives prior to making a
determination of the preferred alternative..
Echoing previously made comments with regard to the opposition of Alternatives 5A and 5B,
City Manager Nelson assured the attending and viewing residents that the City is of the same
opinion as the residents and that the City will continue to monitor the matter.
Mayor Comerchero thanked Mayor Pro Tem Roberts for his support role on the CETAP/RCTC
Committees.
MOTION: Councilman Naggar moved to receive and file the report and to prepare a resolution
of opposition with regard to Alternatives 5A and 5B. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro
Tem Roberts and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Councilman Stone who
was absent.
18 Proposed Urban Limit Line
RECOMMENDATION:
18.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 01-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ADOPTING AN URBAN LIMIT LINE FOR THE
EAST AND SOUTH SIDES OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA'S
PLANNING AREA TO IMPLEMENT THE GENERAL PLAN
Deputy City Manager Thornhill reviewed the staff report (as per agenda material).
City Attorney Thorson noted that the above-recommended action would not bind the County
because the City has no legal jurisdiction over the County but that it would tie all elements of the
City's General Plan into this concept as policy of the City. For Councilman Naggar, it was noted
that it would be appropriate to include this issue as part of discussion in the City's General Plan
update.
R:\Minutes\092501
10
Mayor Pro Tern Roberts requested that the County's citrus/vineyard areas be reflected in the
Urban Limit Line.
For Councilman Pratt, Deputy City Manager Thornhill clarified the term sphere of influence,
noting that it is the area likely to become future City boundary, advising that on the east side of
the City the sphere of influence is co-terminus, meaning the City boundary and sphere of
influence is the same, advising that the City would be establishing a differentiation between
urban uses and rural uses and stating that the City's action would limit further urbanization to
the east of the City boundary,
Councilman Pratt suggested that the potentially affected residents to the east be apprised to
ensure issues are properly represented.
Having served on the General Plan Advisory Committee of Riverside County for aimost two
years, Mr. Steve Corona, 33320 Highway 79, commented on densities, General Plan
designations, County General Plan process, and noted that it would be premature of the City
Council to adopt the proposed resolution prior to discussing the matter with the General Plan
Advisory Committee as well as the affected property owners east of Butterfield Stage Road or
suggested that if approved, higher density be permitted.
Serving on several of the Riverside County Integrated Plan committees, Dr. Robert Wheeler,
29090 Camino Alba, Murrieta, noted that the County is not following its own General Plan and
spoke in support of the Urban Limit Line and encouraged the City Council to approve the
proposed action.
Concurring with Mr. Corona, Mr. Larry Markham, 41750 Winchester Road, representing MDMA,
requested that the potential affected property owners be contacted to provide input and noted
that a clear definition of the terms urban and rural need to be defined by the City.
Viewing the passage of the proposed resolution as meaningless, Councilman Naggar
suggested that the General Plan Committee review and address the issue and forward its
recommendations to the City Council and relayed his opposition to the County upzoning any
properties without proper mitigation.
Mayor Pro Tem Roberts requested a clear definition as to where the citrus/vineyard district is
located; noted that he would further address the matter with the General Plan Advisory
Committee; and relayed his support of a continuance.
MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Roberts moved to continue this matter off calendar. The motion was
seconded by Councilman Naggar and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of
Councilman Stone who was absent.
Mayor Comerchero echoed comments made by his fellow colleagues.
Councilman Naggar encouraged the involvement of the City's General Plan Subcommittee in
this process.
At 9:51 P.M., Mayor Comerchero called a recess and reconvened the meeting at 10:04 P.M.
MOTION: Councilman Naggar moved that the City Council continue with its agenda and to
complete the remaining items. The motion was seconded by Councilman Pratt and voice vote
reflected approval with the exception Councilman Stone who was absent.
R:\Minutes\092501
11
19 Appointment of Members to the General Plan Community Advisory Committee
recommendation:
19.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 01-87
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA CREATING THE GENERAL PLAN COMMUNITY
ADVISORY COMMI'I-I'EE AND SE'I'rING FORTH THEIR
DUTIES AND TERMS
Appoint the remaining members of the General Plan Community Advisory Committee.
Deputy City Manager Thornhill reviewed the staff report (of record), clarifying that the Planning
Commission (David Matthewson), Public Traffic Safety Commission (Darrell Connerton), and
Community Services Commission (James Meyler) appointments have been made and that the
City Council, this evening, is being requested to choose whether the Chamber of Commerce or
the Economic Development Council should have representation, noting that which ever
organization is chosen would then make its representative selection.
MOTION: Councilman Naggar moved to adopt Resolution No. 01-87. The motion was
seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Roberts and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of
Councilman Stone who was absent.
City residents (one appointed by each City Councilmember)
Councilman Naggar appointed Mr. Mark Broderick
Councilman Pratt appointed Ms. Michelle Anderson
Mayor Pro Tem Roberts appointed Mr. Paul Jacobs
Mayor Comerchero appointed Mr. Greg Morrison
Councilman Stone was absent (appointment to be made at the October 9, 2001, City
Council meeting.)
Representative of the Chamber of Commerce or the Economic Development Council ( as
determined by the City Council)
In response to extensive discussion as to why either the Chamber of Commerce or the
Economic Development Council should be chosen to select one representative, City Manager
Nelson suggested that each organization be given the opportunity to select one representative.
Councilman Naggar concurred that one representative from each organization be selected and
that each representative must be a resident.
AMENDED MOTION: Councilman Naggar moved to adopt Resolution No. 01-87 as amended
(Section 3d Members - A member of the Chamber of Commerce and the Economic
Development Council and that each member be a resident). The motion was seconded by
Councilman Pratt and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Councilman Stone
who was absent.
R:\Minutes\092501
12
Represen'~ative of a local environmental or community orqanization (as determined bv the City
Council)
Mr. Chris Pederson, 31052 Wellington Circle, encouraged the General Plan Committee to listen
to the individuals who had signed the Harveston Project and Wolf Creek Project petitions.
Mr. Carl Ross, 43886 Butternut Drive, requested that the people be heard and that the Wolf
Creek Project be voted on in the March election.
Dr. Wheeler informed the City Council that he is associated with the Elsinore/Murrieta Anza
Resource Conservation District.
MOTION: Mayor Pro Tern Roberts moved to appoint Dr. Robert Wheeler. The motion was
seconded by Mayor Comerchero. Voice vote reflected no action on the motion, as follows:
AYES: Roberts, Comerchero
NOES: Naggar, Pratt
ABSENT: Stone
MOTION: Councilman Naggar moved to appoint Ms. Pamela Miod. The motion was seconded
by Councilman Pratt. Voice vote reflected no action on the motion, as follows:
AYES: Naggar, Pratt
NOES: Roberts, Comerchero
ABSENT: Stone
Explaining his no vote for Dr. Wheeler, Councilman Naggar relayed his opposition to the
SMART Growth concept, clustering density, etc. and requested that the General Plan Advisory
Committee adequately address all viewpoints. In order to address the matter with Dr. Wheeler,
Mr. Naggar suggested that the issue be tabled to the next City Council meeting.
MOTION: Councilman Naggar suggested that the appointment of a local environmental or
community organization be tabled to the next City Council meeting. The motion was seconded
by Councilman Pratt and voice vote reflect approval with the exception of Councilman Stone
who was absent.
Congratulations were extended to those individuals who were appointed to serve on the
General Plan Advisory Committee.
20 Future City Hall Site Selection
RECOMMENDATION:
20.1 Appoint an ad-hoc committee to participate in the site selection process for a future
City Hall;
20.2 Provide direction to staff to prepare a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) to hire a
consultant to lead this selection process.
Assistant to the City Manager Yates presented the staff report (as per agenda material).
R:\Minutes\092501
13
In light of the economy, the City's ability to determine its own location for a future City Hall site,
and that a future location is not necessary for several years, Councilman Naggar suggested that
the matter be continued off calendar.
Councilman Pratt echoed Councilman Pratt's comments.
MOTION: Councilman Naggar moved to continue the matter off calendar. The motion was
seconded by Councilman Pratt and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of
Councilman Stone who was absent and Mayor Comerchero who voted no.
21 Consideration of Increased Bus Service for Temecula
(at the request of Councilman Pratt)
RECOMMENDATION:
21.1 Provide direction to staff regarding the possible increase in bus service for
Temecula.
Councilman Pratt presented the staff report.
Having been in transportation for the past 20 years, Mr. Ed Dool, 28464 Old Town Front Street,
commented on the limited and poor bus service provided by Riverside Transit Authority (RTA)
for the City and, therefore, suggested the implementation of a demonstration project in order to
determine the City's wants and needs.
Although concurring with increasing bus service for the City, Councilman Naggar noted that
another alternative could be to control the City's growth and monitoring the growth on freeways
to ensure they are not overwhelmed.
In response to Councilman Pratt, Mayor Comerchero advised that measures have been taken
and noted that the Holiday Shuttle Service will again be provided and that the establishment of a
Commuter Service has been placed into the 10-year Strategic Plan with the hopes of being
redesignated into the short-range Transit Plan.
MOTION: Councilman Pratt moved to receive and file the report and to authorize staff the
necessary time to coordinate with RTA to ensure proper follow up. The motion was seconded
by Councilman Naggar and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Councilman
Stone who was absent.
Although concurring with the motion, Councilman Pratt relayed his opposition to 10-year plans
and encouraged to City to become financially involved in order to properly address this matter.
Mayor Pro Tern Roberts further clarification with regard to RTA funding, commuter bus systems,
and the Mobile Service Reduction Committee.
DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS
No additional comments.
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
No comment.
R:\Minutes\092501
14
CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT
City Attorney Thorson advised that with regard to the real estate item, final action would be
taken in public session at the next City Council meeting and that with regard to the litigation
matters, the City Council gave direction and that there is no further action to report under
Closed Session.
ADJOURNMENT
At 10:44 P.M., the City Council meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, October 9, 2001, at
7:00 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
A'FI'EST:
[~SEAL]
R:\Minutes\092501
15