HomeMy WebLinkAbout051999 PC Minutes MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
MAY 19, 1999
CALL TO ORDER
The City of Temecula Planning Commission convened in a regular meeting at 6:01 P.M.,
on Wednesday March 19, 1999, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hall,
43200 Business Park Ddve, Temecula, California.
ALLEGIANCE
The audience was led in the Flag salute by Commissioner Fahey.
ROLL CALL
Present: Commissioners Fahey, Naggar, Soltysiak, * Webster, ~nd
Chairman Guerdero.
Absent None.
Also Present: Planning Manager Ubnoske,
Deputy Director of Public Works Parks,
Housing and Redevelopment Manager Meyer,
Attorney Curley,
Senior Planner Brown,
Senior Planner Fagan,
Assistant Planner Anders, and
Minute Clerk Hansen.
· (Commissioner Soltysiak arrived at 6:13 P.M.)
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No comments.
COMMISSION BUSINESS
t. Approval of Agenda
MOTION: Commissioner Naggar moved to approve the agenda. The motion was
seconded by Commissioner Webster and voice vote reflected approval with the
exception of Commissioner Soltysiak who was absent.
2. Approval of Minutes-April 7, 1999
MOTION: Commissioner Fahey moved to approve the minutes, as written. The motion
was seconded by Commissioner Webster and voice vote reflected approval with the
exception of Commissioner Soltysiak who was absent and Commissioner Naggar who
abstained.
3. PA98-0307 Promendade in Temecula Regional Mall Pylon Sign
By way of overheads, Senior Planner Fagan presented the staff report (per agenda
material); relayed the revisions of the modified proposed entry sign, as follows: 1) the
height decrease from twenty-seven feet (27') to twenty-six feet (26'), 2) the stone base,
3) the stone side columns, and 4) the decrease of display panels from eight (8) panels to
seven (7); and for Commissioner Webster, in order to provide clarification as to color,
presented the sample stone veneer material.
Mr. Steve Schafenacker, representing the applicant, noted the modified proposal of
replacing the odginal plan to install two signs to the current proposal to install a singular
sign; further specified the design of the sign, relaying the consistency with the design of
the mall buildings; and for Commission Webster, cladf'~d that the flower design and the
lettering in The Promenade portions of the sign would be illuminatod.
MOTION: Commissioner Neggar moved to approve the twenty-six foot (26') high f~rcc
standing sign for the Promenade Mall in Temecu;a, in accordance with Exhibits A - Site
Plan, B - Median Location Plan, C - Sign Elevation and D - Color and Material Board.
Commissioner Webster seconded the motion and voice vote reflected approval with the
exception of Commissioner Soltysiak who was absent.
4. PA98-0369 Mall Comer Monument Sign at Winchester/Ynez Roads
It was noted that Commissioner Soltysiak arrived at 6:13
By way of color renderings, Senior Planner Fagan presented the staff report (of record),
highlighting the water features, the stonework, the illumination, and landscaping; for
Commission Soltysiak, specified the width of the proposed project as forty-nine feet (49')
inclusive of the base; and presented the site plan to clarify the overall scale of the
proposed monument, providing the dimensions of the six foot (6') sidewalk, the nine foot
(9') parking stall in order to establish perspective with regard to size.
Mr. Steve Schafenacker, representing the applicant, further specified the depth and
width of the sign monument, as follows: 1) that The Promenade portion of the sign would
be arched, 2) the location of the logo, and 3) that the fountains will be twelve foot (12') in
diameter;, for Commissioner Soltysiak, clarified the proximity of the parking area and the
forty foot (40') landscape buffer between the monument sign and the adjacent perking
area; for Commissioner Webster, relayed the location of the concealed water equipment
and utilities; for Chairman Guerriero, advised that while the exact fountain design had
not been formulated, that the fountain spray would be cylindrically-shaped, similar in
appearance to the spray of a fire hose; provided assurance that the fountain would be
designed to the scale of the mall project; noted that the applicant would be agreeable to
lighting the water jet streams; and requested flexibility regarding the lettering in The
Promenade to allow a push-through acrylic matedal verses the prismatic lettering
proposed if at a future point in time it is determined that modifying the matedal would be
a better alternative.
While not disapproving of the proposed design, Commissioner Naggar suggested
developing a design with a lake appearance, connecting the two water reservoirs.
It was the consensus of the Planning Commission that the project was well designed,
and that the project should move forward, as proposed.
5. Director's Hearin¢; Case Ui)date
Planning Manager Ubnoske relayed that she was available to answer any questions
regarding the agenda material with respect to the Director's Hearing Case Update.
PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
6. Plannina Ao;)lication No. PA99-0104 (Specific Plan Amendment)
Request to amend the Specific Plan No. 263 (Temecula Regional Center)
allowing the theater to erect a freestanding marquee sign 26 feet (26') in
height.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended by the Planning Department that the Planning
Commission approve the request.
By way of overhead and maps, Senior Planner Fagan presented the staff report (per
agenda material); relayed that the request to amend the Specific Plan was for the
purpose of permitting the proposed twenty six foot (26') freestanding sign, noting that
currently there are alternate theater marquee signs on adjacent roads (although lower in
height); specified the location of the proposed signage; for Commissioner Nagger,
advised that if it was the desire of the Commission additional language could be added
to the amendment to reflect allowance of solely one marquee; for Commissioner Fahey,
clarified the location of the comer monument, the Promenade signs, and the proposed
theater sign; noted that the permitted height for signage at the Power Center was twelve
feet (12'); for Commissioner Webster, provided the location of alternate Edwards
Cinema signage; for Commissioner Soltysiak, relayed that the island median where the
proposed signage would be located would be landscaped; and in response to
Commissioner Soltysiak's querying, noted that this particular sign would exceed the
permitted signage per the City's Sign Ordinance.
Ms. Patti Skoglund, representing the applicant, relayed that the design of this particular
signage would be consistent with the matedal used on the mall buildings (i.e., the stone,
the base); for Commissioner Webster, noted that there were approximately three
alteemate marquee signs for the Edwards Cinema; and relayed that the rationale for the
proposed signage was due to the fact the Edwards theater would be located at the rear
of the mall.
Ms. Patricia Hall, 27483 Lark Court, expressed opposition to the project due to the
negative visual effect, and the diversion it could provide to traffic attention, with the
potential of creating a hazard.
> The Commission expressed the following concerns and comments:
Commissioner Naggar relayed his concems, as follows:
> that the height of this particular sign would be inappropriate, perspective of
alternate mall features, specifically the comer monument
that the Edwards Cinema has sufficient alternate signage
opposed amending the Specific Plan due to the long-term effects on future
signage in the area
> recommended that the Specific Plan regulation of twelve foot (12") be
maintained
Commissioner Fahey relayed her comments, as follows:
That she was opposed to amending the Specific Plan
> Expressed concern regarding the proliferation of signage
Advised that this particular signage was unsuitable
Commissioner Webster relayed concurrence with the aforementioned
Commission comments.
Commissioner Soltysiak expressed his comments, as follows:
> Relayed concern with regard to signage throughout the mall site, querying
the impact each sign would have in perspective to the scale of the mall
project in its entirety
> Advised that this particular signage could minimize the effect of the approved
Mall Comer Monument Sign
Chairman Guerriero expressed opposition to amending the Specific Plan.
MOTION: Commissioner Naggar moved to close the public hearing; deny the request to
amend the Specific Plan; and to deny the twenty-six foot (26') freestanding
entertainment marquee for the Edwards Cinema at the Promenade Mall. Commissioner
Webster seconded the motion.
Initially, Commissioner Soltysiak queried whether there would be benefit to bdnging the
project beck to the Commission, in order for the applicant to address the Commission's
con(ems.
For Commissioner Soltysiak, Planning Manager clarified the Specific Plan with regard to
its nonspecificity to overall signage, relaying that the Specific Plan provided general
provisions (i.e., specifying the number of signs per development).
At this time voice vote was taken reflecting unanimous denial of the project, as
proposed.
7. Plannin.q Application No. PA97o0444 (Tentative Parcel map No. 28000) and
Plannin~ Application No. PA97-0446 (Change of Zone)
Request to subdivide 1.07 net acres into two residential lots, and to change
the zoning of the property from Low Density Residential LI ('1 acre to 2.5
acres lot size) to Low Density Residential L2 (1/2 acre to 1 acre lot size).
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended by the Planning Department that the Planning
Commission approve the request.
Commissioner Soltysiak advised that he would be abstaining with regard to this Agenda
Item, and therefore left the dais.
By way of maps, Assistant Planner Anders presented the staff report (of record);
highlighted the current zoning in the adjacent area; relayed that staff had received three
letters in opposition to the project, one prior to the hearing which were distributed to the
Commission; noted that the concerns expressed were, as follows; alteration of the rural
character of the community, the threat of grading reducing the equestrian trails, the
potential of decreased property values, noise, increased traffic, and dust pollution;
relayed that staff has advised that this particular project would be an appropriate use for
the area of discussion; for Commissioner Fahey, clarified that the previous addressed
issues of concerns (i.e., roads, septic, water, and emergency access) have been
addressed; and for Commissioner Naggar, relayed that the proposed project is for the
development of two residential lots on 1.07 acres.
Mr. Larry Markham, representing the applicant, for Commissioner Fahey, specified in
detail the improvements in the area of discussion; in response to Commissioner
Naggar's comments, regarding the letter submitted by Mr. and Mrs. Gosser (per
supplemental agenda material) relayed that the CC&R's for this particular site expired
three years ago; noted that the negative eroding effect in the area are most likely due to
the natural sandy soil, relaying that due to the dense landscaping, this particular project
would not have significantly impact the erosion; and provided additional clarification with
regard to the provision of utilities.
The following individuals spoke in opposition to the project:
~ Mr. Wilson Nolan 30250 Santiago Road
c~ Ms. Brook Nolan 30250 Santiago Road
The aforementioned individuals voiced their concerns, as follows:
· ~ That the quality of life would be affected detrimentally
,~ Recommended that the spaciousness of the area be preserved
· ~ Voice concern regarding the potential for a continued progression of future
zoning changes
· ~ That the habitat of wildlife would be disturbed
The following individual spoke in favor of the project
o Mr. Dennis Marchand representing Pacific Capital Investments
(located on the adjoining parcel)
The aforementioned individual expressed his comments, as follows:
.~ Located their business adjacent the property in discussion due to the fact that
this particular project was proposed
· ,' Commended the existing improvements (Le., concrete curbing and gutters)
,~ Relayed that this project was an asset to the area
In response to community comments, Mr. Markham specified the adjacent site plans,
noting that there would most likely not be any further subdivisions along Santiago Road;
noted the improvements this project would provide to the area; and relayed for the
record that the applicant had received two letters in favor of the project that would be
submitted to the clerk.
Chairman Guerriero closed the public hearing at this time.
Commissioner Fahey advised that the applicant has adequately addressed the previous
expressed concems for this particular site.
For community informational purposes, Commissioner Webster advised that there were
ten specific requirements in order for development to take place in this particular area,
noting that although haif-acre lots are permitted in this area, that it would not mandate
the continuation of subdividing lots.
Commissioner Naggar expressed concurrence with previous Commission comments,
relaying that he would support the project.
MOTION: Commissioner Fahey moved to Resolution No. 99-012 recommending
approval of Planning Application No. PA97-0446 (Zoning Amendment, Map Change)
based upon the Analysis and Findings contained in the Staff Report; and adopt
Resolution No. 99-013 approving Planning Application No. PA97-0~?.~. (Tentative Parcel
Map No. 28000) based upon the Analysis and Findings contained in the Staff Report,
and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval; and adopt the Mitigated Negative
Declaration for Planning Application Nos. PA97-0446 and PA97-0444; and adopt the
Mitigation Monitoring Program for Planning Application No. PA97-0446 and PA97-0444.
PC RESOLUTION NO. 99-012
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. PA97-0446 (ZONING AMENDMENT), TO CHANGE THE ZONE FROM L1
TO L2 ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF
ESTERO COURT AND ORMSBY ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S
PARCEL NO. 945-070-011
PC RESOLUTION NO. 99-013
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0444
(TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 28000) TO SUBDIVIDE A 1.07 ACRE
PARCEL INTO TWO (2) PARCELS LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST
CORNER OF ESTERO COURT AND ORMSBY ROAD AND KNOWN AS
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 945-070-011
The motion was seconded by Commissioner Webster and voice vote reflected approval
with the exception Commissioner Soltysiak who abstained.
8. Planning Apl31ication No. 99-0t60
Request to amend the Specific Plan to modify parking standards.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended by the Planning Department that the Planning
Commission recommend that the City Council approve Specific Pan
Amendment 99-t 60
By way of overheads, Senior Planner Hogan presented the staff report (of record);
relayed that the proposal would eliminate the need for public parking in the Tourist Retail
Core and The Community Commercial/Tourist Support Districts in Old Town, noting that
the City's Redevelopment Agency would continue to provide centralized parking in Old
Town; advised that staff would continually monitor the parking in Old Town; for
Commissioner Naggar, advised that the rationale of the amendment would be to induce
economic growth; noted that staff was of the opinion that the lack of on-site parking
would not negatively affect business, relaying that the amendment would not prohibit on-
site parking if a merchant desired to maintain on-site parking; in response to
Commissioner Soltysiak's comments, relayed that although staff is in the process of
developing additional off-street parking that there is no current Master Plan addressing
the specificity of exact location of future parking lots; and noted that the City would be
tracking growth in order to adequately address the parking needs.
Housing and Redevelopment Manager Meyer provided clarification with regard to the
Specific Plan; with respect to public parking relayed that the City plans to utilize the
Black property and the Stampede property for future parking sites; advised that the
rationale for the proposal would be to revitalize economic growth; and in response to
Commissioner Soltysiak's comments, relayed that if at a future point in time additional
parking would be required it would be the fruition of staff's goal and that the City would
mitigate the parking issue (i.e., building parking structures, or acquiring more land), as
needed.
In response to Commissioner Soltysiak's comments, Deputy Director of Public Works
Parks specified that the amendment would affect a small core area; advised that the City
does own property in this area; noted that when special events take place in Old Town
the pedestrians are shuttled in and out; advised that the City addresses the issue of
parking with each event, and will address the parking needs in Old Town as they adse;
and noted that staff is in the process of planning for additional parking, with the desire to
need provisional measures to provide for this impact, reiterating that the goal is to
stimulate growth.
Commissioner Fahey recommended that there be provision for on-street parking
designation for handicapped parking.
In response to Commissioner Webster's comments, Senior Planner Hogan clarified that
there would be no required on-site loading areas due to the small-scale uses; and
relayed that due to the language of the amended Ordinance that if at a future point in
time a larger use would locate in the core area, on-site parking would not be required.
The following individuals spoke in favor of the amendment:
~ Mr. Hank Testasecca Old Town Merchant
z3 Mr. Ed Doul Old Town Merchant
~ Mr. Ron Walton Old Town Merchant
The above-mentioned individuals relayed their comments, as follows:
,' That it would provide incentive for new businesses to establish in Old Town
,~ That it would stimulate expansion of existing businesses
,' That vadous merchants would maintain on-site parking
,- Relayed that the City's existing parking lot was being utilized daily
,' Concurred with Commissioner Soltysiak's comments, recommending the
development of a model to plan for future parking sites
· - Concurred with Commissioner Fahey's comments regarding parking
provisions for Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
Commissioner Naggar relayed his suppor[ of the project; with regard to the lack of
loading areas, suggested designated limited hours for loading; and concurred with
Commissioner Fahey's comments regarding ADA parking provisions.
Commissioner Fahey advised that at the time the Specific Plan was developed the
objective for Old Town was to maintain heavy development with buildings close in
proximity and pedestrian-oriented streets; and relayed that she supported the project,
noting its consistency with the original intent for Old Town.
_Commissioner Soltysiak relayed that while supporting the proposal, he would
recommend the development of a master plan to incorporate planning for future parking
sites.
Commissioner Webster expressed support of the proposal, modified, as follows: 1)
provision for ADA parking, and 2) to provide flexibility in order to require large permitted
uses to maintain on-site parking.
Chairman Guerriero commended staff for their diligent efforts associated with Old Town;
concurred with providing provisions for ADA parking and time limits for loading; and
recommended that the parking issues be mitigated via staff recommendation.
MOTION: Commissioner Fahey moved to adopt Resolution No. 99-014 recommending
that the City Council adopt an Ordinance entitled "An Ordinance Of The City Council Of
The City of Temecula Amending The Old Town Specific Plan To Modify The Parking
Standards In the Core Of Old Town Temecula (Planning Application No. PA99-0160),"
The motion was seconded by Commissioner Soltysiak. (This motion was amended,
see below.)
Additional Commission discussion ensued.
In response to Commissioner Soltysiak's querying, Attorney Curley advised that since
the action of the Commission would be solely a recommendation to the City Council, that
if it was the desire of the Commission direction could be given to staff to add additional
language to the Planning Commission Resolution addressing the concerns of the
Commission.
MOTION: Commissioner Fahey moved to amend the motion to include the below
mentioned modifications to the Planning Commission Resolution.
PC RESOLUTION NO. 99-0'14
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT AN
ORDINANCE ENTITLED "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN TO
MODIFY THE PARKING STANDARDS IN THE CORE OF OLD TOWN
TEMECULA (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0160)
Modify
Additional language be added to the Planning Commission Resolution
directing staff to incorporate the following:
· Designation of loading time limits
· Development of a long-term master plan for the purpose of planning for
parking provisions at full development
· Adequate public restroom facilities provisions
· Designation of on-street handicapped perking and associated ADA provisions
Commissioner Soltysiak seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous
approval.
At 8:13 P.M. a short recess was taken, and the meeting reconvened at 8:20 P.M.
9. Subdivision Ordinance, Title 16 of the Development Code
Request to establish an Ordinance to regulate the subdivision of land
within the City of Temecula.
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Department recommends that the Planning Commission
approve a Resolution recommending that the City Council adopt the
Negative Declaration and approve the Ordinance.
Senior Project Planner Brown presented the staff report (via agenda material); provided
a brief description of Subdivision State Law; clarified the rationale for the proposed
Ordinance; relayed the process whereby the Ordinance was developed; and presented a
comparison matrix between the Riverside County Subdivision Ordinance 460 and the
proposed Temecula Subdivision Ordinance (per supplemental material), providing
clarification as to the presented modifications.
Attorney Curtey indicated that page 41 of the text document of the Ordinance, under
Park Land Dedication Formula, under Type of Dwelling should be corrected to reflect
single family defached garage in lieu of single family residential, and on the following line
to reflect single family attached garage in lieu of single family attached and then at the
boitom of the page where Section 66477 (a) (a) is indicated, to delete one of the (a)'s.
For Commissioner Soltysiak, Senior Planner Brown provided additional cladficetion as to
the Ordinance's five (5) one-year time extensions, relaying that approximately $125,000
of off-site improvements are included in the Ordinance with a maximum of ten years for
extension; provided additional information regarding the proposed modification with
respect to Map Schedule (referencing the supplemental matrix); and clarified the Dry
Sewers section of the proposed Ordinance.
For Commissioner Webster, Mr. Brown reviewed the rationale for the language of the
Ordinance with respect to the development standards regarding Traditional
Neighborhood Development, relaying that addition modifications are in process and will
be brought back to the Commission in two to three months.
Commissioner Naggar relayed a desire to continue this matter in order to fully explore
the ramifications of the new Ordinance and to further consult with staff; and noted that
any additional information regarding the comparison between the existing Ordinance and
the proposed Ordinance supplied to the Commission would be appreciated.
~0
Mr. Larry Markham, 41750 Winchester Road, expressed the following comments:
On page 6, of the Subdivision Ordinance under Tentative Map Extensions
recommended that the review authority remains staff approved rather than
the proposed Director Headng Approval.
On page 7, under Section B (2) which indicates a cul-de-sac street shall not
exceed six hundred feet in length recommended maintaining the thirteen
hundred or thirteen twenty feet in length within the City, noting that this
po~on of the Ordinance coupled with the two access requirements for over
thirty-five (35) lots creates disparity.
> Queried page 9, Section B(3) indicating Lot sizes and arrangement shall be
compatible with lots in the surrounding area, recommending that Lot size be
stricken to reflect The lot anangement shall be compatible with lots in the
surrounding area.
> Recommended bringing the Ordinance back to the Commission a year after
its implementation for review
In response to Commissioner Naggar's comments, Attorney Curley provided the rational
for moving forward with the Ordinance in a timely manner.
Commissioner Fahey recommended that staff address Mr. Markham's queries in the
staff report when the matter is brought back to the Commission.
Attorney Curley advised that the language of the Ordinance could potentially be modified
by the City attorney's office regarding map extensions to reflect required approval at
Commission level due to litigating matters.
MOTION: Commissioner Naggar moved to continue the matter to the June 16, 1999
Planning Commission meeting in order for staff to provide additional information to the
Commission. Commissioner Webster seconded the motion and voice vote reflectod
unanimous approval.
PLANNING MANAGER'S REPORT
A. Senior Planner Fagan relayed that the issues of concern expressed by the
Commission regarding the Power Center would be addressed at a June Planning
Commission meeting.
COM MISSIONER REPORTS
A. In response to Commissioner Fahey's comments, Deputy Director of Public
Works Parks relayed that the road improvements in the mall area will be
complete by mid-August; and reported that the Overland Bridge project will be
complete by mid-October.
B. For Commissioner Fahey, Mr. Parks relayed that the City is in the process of
addressing the issue of construction traffic on Margarita Road, specifically the
ftagmen that direct traffics control.
1t
C. For informational purposes, Commissioner Webster distributed to the
Commission supplemental information regarding the latest technologies with
respect to home development.
D. Commissioner Webster expressed appreciation to Commissioner Soltysiak for
the effort, time, and input that he has contributed while serving on the Planning
Commission.
E. Commissioner Naggar commended Commissioner Soltysiak, relaying that he has
learned much from being able to serve with him on the Commission.
F. W'~h regard to construction traffic on Margarita Road, Chairman Guerfiere
relayed that the violations committed by the flagmen are hazardous to the safety
of the community; and relayed that the construction trucks transporting dirt are
not controlling spillage by wetting the loads.
G. For Chairman Guerdero, Mr. Parks relayed that while the construction trucks
traveling in the area are legally able to do so, noting that staff is addressing the
issue via the formation of the Grading Ordinance, which will be brought to the
Commission in approximately 60 days.
ADJOURNMENT
At 9:05 P.M. Chairman Guerriero formally adjoumed this meeting to Wednesday, June
2, 1999 at 6:00 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Ddve,
Temecula.
Ro~ ~uerfier~, '(~hairman bie Ubno , lanning M age
12