Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout91_064 PC Resolution RESOLUTION NO. 91-64 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF PLOT PLAN NO. 29 TO CONSTRUCT A MULTI-TENANT COMMERCIAL CENTER ON A PARCEL CONTAINING 28.7 ACRES LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF WINCHESTER ROAD NORTH AND SOUTH OF NICOLAS ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS, 911-150-027. 028. 029; 911-160-027. 029; 911-170-017; AND 919-350-053. WHEREAS. Wall Street Properties filed Plot Plan No. 29 in accordance with the Riverside County Land Use. Zoning. Planning and Subdivision Ordinances. which the City has adopted by reference; WHEREAS. said Plot Plan application was processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing pertaining to said Plot Plan on June 17. 1991. at which time interested persons had opportunity to testify either in support or opposition to said Plot Plan; and WHEREAS. the Planning Commission received a copy of the Staff Report regarding the Plot Plan; NOW. THEREFORE. THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE. DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1, Findin.cjs. That the Temecula Planning Commission hereby makes the following findings: A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360. a newly incorporated city shall adopt a general plan within thirty (30) months following incorporation. During that 30-month period of time. the city is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the requirements of state law that its decisions be consistent with the general plan. if all of the followin9 requirements are met: (1) The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of the general plan, (2) The planning agency finds, in approving projects and takin9 other actions, including the issuance of building permits, each of the following: (a) There is a reasonable probability that the land use or action proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be studied within a reasonable time. A:PP29 1 (b) There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan, (c) The proposed use or action complied with all other applicable requirements of state law and local ordinances. B, The Riverside County General Plan. as amended by the Southwest Area Community Plan. (hereinafter "SWAP") was adopted prior to the incorporation of Temecula as the General Plan for the southwest portion of Riverside County. including the area now within the boundaries of the City, At this time. the City has adopted SWAP as its General Plan guidelines while the City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of its General Plan. C, The proposed Plot Plan is consistent with the SWAP and meet the requirements set forth in Section 65360 of the Government Code. to wit: (1) The City is proceeding in a timely fashion with a preparation of the general plan, (2) The Planning Commission finds, in recommending approval of projects and taking other actions, including the issuance of building permits, pursuant to this title. each of the following: a) There is reasonable probability that Plot Plan No. 29 proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be studied within a reasonable time, b) There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan. c) The proposed use or action complies with all other applicable requirements of state law and local ordinances, D. (1) Pursuant to Section 18.30(c). no plot plan may be approved unless the following findings can be made: A: PP29 2 a) The proposed use must conform to all the General Plan requirements and with all applicable requirements of state law and City ordinances. b) The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety and general welfare; conforms to the logical development of the land and is compatible with the present and future logical development of the surrounding property. ~ 2) The Planning Commission, in recommending approval of the proposed Plot Plan, makes the followln9 findings, to wit: a) There is a reasonable probability that Plot Plan No. 29 will be consistent with the City's future General Plan, which will be completed in a reasonable time and in accordance with state law in that the project is consistent with the existing Specific Plan land use designation for the site. b) There is not a likely probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future General Plan, if the proposed use is ultimately inconsistent with the plan in that the project is consistent with the existln9 Specific Plan land use designation for the slte. c) The proposed use or action complies with state planning and zoning laws in that the proposed uses comply with Ordinance No. 348 and the action complies with state planning laws. d) The site is suitable to accommodate the proposed land use in terms of the size and shape of the lot configuration, circulation patterns, access, and intensity of use and compliance with the requirements of Ordinance 348, e) The project as designed and conditioned will not adversely affect the public health or welfare in that the Conditions of Approval include mitigation measures. A: PP29 3 f) The proposal will not have an adverse effect on surrounding property, because it does not represent a significant change to the planned land use of the area and will not result in adverse traffic or aesthetic impacts to adjacent properties. g) The project has acceptable access to a dedicated right-of-way which is open to, and useable by, vehicular traffic. h) The site is not subject to any significant adverse environmental impacts which cannot be adequately mitigated. i) The design of the project and the type of improvements are such that they are not in conflict with easements for access through or use of the property within the proposed project. j ) That said findings are supported by minutes, maps, exhibits and environmental documents associated with these applications and herein incorporated by reference. E. As conditioned pursuant to SECTION 3, the Plot Plan .proposed conforms to the logical development of its proposed site, and ~s compatible with the present and future development of the surrounding property. SECTION 2. Environmental Compliance. An Initial Study prepared for this project indicates that although the proposed project could have a significant impact on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described in the Conditions of Approval have been added to the project, and a Negative Declaration, therefore, is hereby granted. SECTION 3. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby recommends approval of Plot Plan No. 29 to construct a multi-tenant commercial center located at the northeast and southeast corners of Winchester Road and Nicolas Road and known as Assessor's Parcel Nos. 911-150-027. 028. 029; 911-160-027. 029; 911-170- 017; and 919-350-053 subject to the following conditions: A. Exhibit A. attached hereto. A: PP29 4 SECTION 4. PASSED. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 17th day of June. 1991. CHAIRMAN I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Plannin9 Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 17th day of June. 1991 by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: 5 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS NOES: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS A: PP29 5