HomeMy WebLinkAbout91_110 PC Resolution RESOLUTION NO. 91-110
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING PUBLIC USE PERMIT NO. 4
ALLOWING OPERATION OF THE WISCONSIN EVANGELICAL
LUTHERAN SYNOD DBA CHRISTTHE VINE LUTHERAN CHURCH
WITHIN EXISTING SUITES "N", HIGHLANDS II BUSINESS
CENTER, 40880 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE; AND KNOWN AS
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 910-110-045
WHEREAS, the Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod Church, dba Christ the
Vine Lutheran Church filed Public Use Permit No. 4 in accordance with the Riverside County
Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by
reference;
WHEREAS, said Public Use Permit application was processed in the time and
manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing pertaining to
said Public Use Permit on November 18, 1991, at which time interested persons had
opportunity to testify either in support or opposition to said Public Use Permit and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission received a copy of the Staff Report
regarding the Public Use Permit;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OFTHE CITY OF TEMECULA
DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1.
Findings.
That the Temecula Planning Commission hereby makes the following findings:
1. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly incorporated city shall adopt
a general plan within thirty (30) months following incorporation. During that 30-month
period of time, the city is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted
or the requirements of state law that its decisions be consistent with the general plan,
if ali of the following requirements are met:
A. The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of the general
plan.
B. The planning agency finds, in approving projects and taking other actions,
including the issuance of building permits, each of the following:
STAFFRPT\4,PUP 7
(1) There is a reasonable probability that the land use or action proposed
will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or
studied or which will be studied within a reasonable time,
(2) There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference
with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is
ultimately inconsistent with the plan,
(3) The proposed use or action complied with all other applicable
requirements of state law and local ordinances.
2, The Riverside County General Plan, as amended by the Southwest Area Community
Plan, (hereinafter "SWAP") was adopted prior to the incorporation of Temecula as the
General Plan for the southwest portion of Riverside County, including the area now
within the boundaries of the City, At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as its
General Plan guidelines while the City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the
preparation of its General Plan,
3, The proposed Public Use Permit is consistent with the SWAP and meets the
requirements set forth in Section 65360 of the Government Code, to wit:
A, The City is proceeding in a timely fashion with a preparation of the general
plan.
B. The Planning Commission finds, in approving of projects and taking other
actions, including the issuance of building permits, pursuant to this title, each
of the following:
(1) There is reasonable probability that Public Use Permit No. 4 proposed
will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or
studied or which will be studied within a reasonable time,
(2) There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference
with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is
ultimately inconsistent with the plan,
(3) The proposed use or action complies with all other applicable
requirements of state law and local ordinances,
C. Pursuant to Section 18,30(c), no public use permit may be approved unless the
following findings can be made:
(1) The proposed use must conform to all the General Plan requirements
and with all applicable requirements of state law and City ordinances.
STAFFRP'T~4.PUP 8
(2) The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the
public health, safety and general welfare; conforms to the logical
development of the land and is compatible with the present and~future
logical development of the surrounding property.
4. The Planning Commission, in approving of the proposed Public Use Permit makes the
following findings, to wit:
A. There is a reasonable probability that Public Use Permit No. 4 will be consistent
with the City's future General Plan, which will be completed in a reasonable
time and in accordance with State law. The project, contingent upon approval
of the requested Public Use Permit, conforms with existing applicable city
zoning and development ordinances.
B. There is not a likely probability of substantial detriment to, or interference with
the City's future General Plan, if the proposed use is ultimately inconsistent
with the Plan. The project is of insignificant scale in the context of the broad
goals and directives anticipated in the City's General Plan. The proposal is also
compatible with existing development in its vicinity, minimizing potentials for
future general plan inconsistencies. Further, if found to be ultimately
detrimental, the use is subject to termination under City Ordinance provisions
contained in Section 18.31 of City Ordinance No. 348.
C. The proposed use or action complies with State planning and zoning laws.
Reference local Ordinances No. 348,460; and California Governmental Code
Sections 65000-66009 (Planning and Zoning Law).
D. The site is suitable to accommodate the proposed land use in terms of the size
and shape of the lot configuration, circulation patterns, access, and intensity
of use. Adequate site circulation, parking, and landscaping currently exist on
the subject site. (Reference Exhibit "D".)
E. The project as designed and conditioned will not adversely affect the public
health or welfare. Reference the project Conditions of Approval (Attachment
No. 2).
F. The proposal will not have an adverse effect on surrounding property, because
it does not represent a significant change to the present or planned land use of
the area. The project conforms with applicable land use and development
regulations.
G. The project has acceptable access to a dedicated right-of-way which is open
to, and useable by, vehicular traffic. The project draws access from County
Center Drive; a dedicated City right-of-way, currently improved to its ultimate
design configuration.
STAFFRP%4.PUP 9
H. The design of the project together with the type of supporting improvements
are such that they are not in conflict with easements for access through, or use
of the property within the proposed project. No exterior alterations or additions
to the existing, previously approved structure are proposed.
I. Said findings are supported by minutes, maps, exhibits associated with this
application and herein incorporated by reference. Supporting documentation is
attached.
5. As conditioned pursuant to SECTION 3, the Public Use Permit proposed conforms to
the logical development of its proposed site, and is compatible with the present and
future development of the surrounding property.
SECTION 2.
Environmental Compliance.
This project is determined to be categorically exempt from the provisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15301 of said Act which addresses
environmental assessment required of proposed minor interior alterations to existing
structures.
SECTION 3.
Conditions.
That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby approves Public Use Permit No. 4
a resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approving of Public Use
Permit No. 4. Allowing operation of the Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod dba Christ the
Vine-Lutheran Church within existing suites "N" of Highlands II Business Center, 40880
County Center Drive and known as Assessor's Parcel No. 910-110-045 subject to the
following conditions:
6. Attachment 2, attached hereto.
STAFERPT~4.FUp 10
SECTION 4.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of November, 1991.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 18th day of
November, 1991 by the following vote of the Commission:
AYES: 4 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
NOES: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
ABSENT: 1 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
STA FFP~C~r~4'PU P 1 1