Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout91_045 PC Resolution RESOLUTION NO. 90-~!5 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A ONE YEAR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLOT PLAN NO.10675. A TWO STORY OFFICE BUILDING LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF SINGLE OAK DRIVE APPROXIMATELY 300 FEET EAST OF BUSINESS PARK DRIVE. WHEREAS.Bedford Properties filed an extension request for Plot Plan No, 10675 in accordance with the Riverside County Land Use. Zoning. Planning and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference; WHEREAS. said plot plan extension application was processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS. the Planning Commission considered said plot plan extension on May 20. 1991. at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commission recommended approval of said plot plan extension; NOW, THEREFORE. THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE. DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1, Findings. That the Temecula Planning Commission hereby makes the following findings: A, Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly incorporated city shall adopt a general plan within thirty 130) months following incorporation, During that 30-month period of time. the city is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the requirements of state law that its decisions be consistent with the general plan. if all of the following requirements are met: I1) The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of the general plan. (2) The planning agency finds, in approving projects and taking other actions, including the issuance of building permits, each of the following: a) There is a reasonable probability that the land use or action proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be studied within a reasonable time. STAFFRPT\PP10675 1 b) There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan. c) The proposed use or action complied with all other applicable requirements of state law and local ordinances. B. The Riverside County General Plan, as amended by the Southwest Area Community Plan, (hereinafter "SWAP") was adopted prior to the incorporation of Temecula as the General Plan for the southwest portion of Riverside County, including the area now within the boundaries of the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as its General Plan guidelines while the City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of its General Plan. C. The proposed plot plan is consistent with the SWAP and meets the requirements set forth in Section 65360 of the Government Code, to wit: (1) The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with a preparation of the general plan. (2) The Planning Commission finds, in approvin9 projects and taking other actions, including the issuance of building permits, pursuant to this title, each of the following: a) There is reasonable probability that Plot Plan No. 10675 proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be studied within a reasonable time. b) There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan. c) The proposed use or action complies with all other applicable requirements of state law and local ordinances. D. ~1) Pursuant to Section 18.30(c), no Plot Plan may be approved unless the following findings can be made: a) The proposed use must conform to all the General Plan requirements and with all applicable requirements of state law and City ordinances. STAFFRPT\PP10675 2 b) The overall development of the land, is designed for the protection of the public health, safety and general welfare; conforms to the logical development of the land and is compatible with the present and future logical development of the surrounding property. (2) The Planning commission, in approving the proposed Plot Plan Extension, makes the following findings, to wit: a) The proposed office building is consistent with the Area Plan land use designation and the zone in which it will be located. b) The project will not constitute an adverse impact on surrounding land uses in that it will be compatible with existing land uses in the area. c) The site is adequate for the proposed use in that parking, internal traffic circulation, and landscaping are adequate and meet all applicable requirements and development standards in the M-SC Zone, d) The site will have adequate access from the street on which it has frontage, e) Potential subsidence hazards can be adequately mitigated. f) The traffic generated by the project will not constitute a significant adverse impact on the level of service of the streets in the area and the developer is required to pay traffic signal mitigation and road improvement fees. g) There is a reasonable probability that the project will be consistent with the City's General Plan once adopted, in that the proposed office building is consistent with the Southwest Area Plan land use designation and the M-SC Zone and is compatible with surrounding zoning and existing land uses in the vicinity. h) It is unlikely that the proposed revised tentative map will constitute a substantial detriment to the future General Plan if the proposed office building is ultimately inconsistent with the plan. The project is compatible with surrounding zoning and existing land uses. STAFFRPT\PP10675 3 i) The lawful conditions stated in the project's Conditions of Approval are deemed necessary to protect the public health, safety and welfare. j) These findings are supported by minutes. maps. exhibits, and environmental documents associated with these applications and herein incorporated by reference. E. As conditioned pursuant to SECTION 3. the Plot Plan proposed conforms to the logical development of its proposed site. and is compatible with the present and future development of the surrounding property. SECTION 2. Environmental Compliance. An Initial Study prepared for this project indicated that the proposed project will not have a significant impact on the environment, and a Negatlve Declaration was adopted by Riverside County on November 7. 1988 at the Planning Director's Hearing. SECTION 3. Conditions. That the city of Temecula Planning Commission hereby approves a one year Extension of Time for Plot Plan No. 10675. a two story office building located on the south side of Single Oak Drive 300 feet east of Business Park Drive subject to the followin9 conditions: A. Exhibit A. attached hereto. PASSED. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 20th day of May. 1991. ~OENNIS CHINIAEFF ~) ~ CHAIRMAN I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 20th day of May. 1991 by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: 5 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS Blair, Fahey, Ford, Hoagland, Chiniaeff* NOES: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS None * ABSENT: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS None* · As reflected in the May 20th, 1991 Minutes STAFFRPT\PP10675 4