HomeMy WebLinkAbout042402 PC AgendaIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this
meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (909) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will
enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR
35.102.35.104 ADA Title II]
AGENDA
TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE .
APRIL 24, 2002 - 6:00 P.M.
CALL TO ORDER:
Flag Salute:
Roll Call:
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Next in Order:
Resolution: No. 2002-007
Telesio
Guerriero, Mathewson, Olhasso, Co-Chair Telesio and Chairman
Chiniaeff
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Commission
on items that are listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes each.
If you desire to speak to the Commission about an item not on the Agenda, a pink
"Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Commission Secretary.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the
Commission Secretary prior to the Commission addressing that item. There is a three
(3) minute time limit for individual speakers.
CONSENT CALENDAR
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will
be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless
Members of the Planning Commission request specific items be removed from the
Consent Calendar for separate action.
Aqenda
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the Agenda of April 24, 2002
R:\PLANCOMM~Agendas~002\4-24-02.doc
1
2
Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve the Minutes of the April 3, 2002 Meeting
3 Director's Hearincl Case Update
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Approve the Director's Hearing Case Update
COMMISSION BUSINESS
PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS'
Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before a
public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the
approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the
projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or
someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences
delivered to the Commission Secretary at, or prior to, the public hearing.
Continued Items
Planninq APplication No. 01-0307 (Development Plan) - Matthew Harris, Associate Planner
- CONTINUED TO MAY 1, 2002
Planninq Application No. 01-0309 (Development Plan) - Rick Rush Proiect Planner -
CONTINUED TO MAY 1, 2002
New Items
Plannina Application No. 01-0445 (Extension of Time) - Thomas Thornslev, Associate
Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1 Adopt a Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. 01-0445 (Extension of Time)
based on the Determination of Consistency with a project for which a Negative
Declaration was previously adopted pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 -
Subsequent EIR's and Negative Declarations.
R:\PLANCOMIvl~Agendas~2002\4-24-02.doc
2
6.2 Adopt a Resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2002-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. PA01-0445 (THE SECOND ONE YEAR EXTENSION OF
TIME), FOR PA97-0420 (DEVELOPMENT PLAN) TO
CONSTRUCT AND OPERATE A SENIOR APPARTMENT
BUILDING, TWO MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDINGS TOTALING
27,700 SQUARE FEET, 69 INDEPENDENT CARE HOUSING
UNITS WITH A DETACHED CLUBHOUSE AND POOL (380,859
TOTAL SQUARE FEET) WITH ASSOCIATED PARKING AND
LANDSCAPING ON A PARCEL CONTAINING 22.62 ACRES
LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOMALINDA
AND PALA ROADS, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.S
961-010-014 AND 961-010-015.
7 Planninq Ap'plication No. 01-0539 (Development Plan) - Matthew Harris, Associate Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1 Adopt a Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. 01-0539 (Development Plan)
pursuant to Section 15332 of the California Environmental Quality Act;
7.2 Adopt a Resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2002-__
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. 01-0539, DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT,
ESTABLISH AND OPERATE A 18,894 SQUARE FOOT TWO-
STORY OFFICE/WAREHOUSE BUILDING ON A .96 ACRE SITE
GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ENTERPRISE
CIRCLE NORTH, 230 FEET NORTH OF WINCHESTER ROAD
KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 909-281-003
8
Planninq Application No. 01-0385 - Michael McCoy, Prelect Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
8.1 Adopt a Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. 01-0385 pursuant to Section
15332 of the California Environmental Quality Act
R:\PLANCOMM~Agendas~2002~-24-02.doc
3
8.2 Adopt a Resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2002-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. 01-0385, DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT,
ESTABLISH AND OPERATE TWO MULTI-TENANT
INDUSTRIAL/WAREHOUSE SPECULATIVE BUILDINGS, ONE
OF 19,400 SQ. FT. AND ONE OF 23,700 SQ. FT. ON A 3.25-
ACRE VACANT PARCEL LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF
WINCHESTER ROAD AT THE TERMINUS OF COLT COURT
AND WEST OF DIAZ ROAD KNOWN AS ASSESSORS
PARCEL NOS. 909-360-025 & 042
9 Plannincl Application No. 01-0386- Michael McCov, Proiect Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
9.1 Adopt a Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. 01-0386 pursuant to Section
15332 of the California Environmental Quality Act
9.2 Adopt a Resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2002-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. 01-0386, DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT,
ESTABLISH AND OPERATE A 33,226 SQUARE FOOT
INDUSTRIALJWAREHOUSE BUILDING ON A 1.91 ACRE
VACANT PARCEL LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF
WINCHESTER ROAD AT THE TERMINUS OF BOSTIK COURT
AND WEST OF DIAZ ROAD KNOWN AS ASSESSORS
PARCEL NO. 909-360-041.
COMMISSIONER'S REPORTS
PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT
ADJOURNMENT Next Meeting:' May 1, 2002 o Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park
Drive, Temecula, CA 92590
R:',,PLANCOMM\Agendas~002\4-24-02,dOC
4
ITEM 2
R:\pLANCOMM~Agendas~2002\4-24-02.doc ~
6
CALL TO ORDER
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
APRIL 3, 2002
The City of Temecula Planning Commission convened !n a regular meeting at 6:00 P.M.,
on Wednesday, April 3, 2002, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hall,
43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
ALLEGIANCE
The audience was led in the Flag salute by Vice Chairman Telesio.
ROLL CALL
Present:
Absent:
Also Present:
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No comments.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 A.qenda
RECOMMENDATION:
Commissioners Guerriero, Mathewson, Olhasso, and Vice
Chairman Telesio.
Chairman Chiniaeff.
Director of Planning Ubnoske,
Assistant City Attorney Curley,
Deputy Director of Public Works Parks,
Fire Battalion Chief Ahmad,
Senior Planner Hazen,
Associate Planner Harris,
Project Planner Rush, and
Minute Clerk Hansen.
2
1.1 Approve the Agenda of April 3, 2002
Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve the Minutes of the Joint Planning Commission/City Council meeting of
January 29, 2002.
2.2 Approve the Minutes of March 6, 2002.
MOTION: Commissioner Mathewson moved to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1-
2. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Guerriero and voice vote reflected
approval with the exception of Chairman Chiniaeff who was absent and Commissioner
Guerriero who abstained from Item No. 2.1.
COMMISSION BUSINESS
PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
3
Planninq Application No. 01-0307 (Development Plan) - Matthew Harris, Associate
Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Adopt a Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. 01-0307 pursuant to
Section 15332 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines;
3.2 Adopt a Resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2002-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. 01-0307, DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO
CONSTRUCT, ESTABLISH AND OPERATE A 24,170
INDUSTRIAL/ WAREHOUSE BUILDING ON 1.50
VACANT ACRES. GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE
SOUTH SIDE OF ZEVO DRIVE, WEST OF DIAZ ROAD
KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 909-360-034
By way of overheads, Associate Planner Harris presented the staff report (of record),
highlighting the site location, the floor plan, the site layout, the access, the parking, the
location of the loading doors and the truck loading ramp which was located at the back
of the building, and the employee lunch area; relayed that the applicant did not hire an
architect to design the building; advised that after a Design Review meeting was held
staff made the applicant aware of several architectural and site design concerns, noting
that since that time staff has reviewed various incremental plan modifications which the
applicant submitted, elaborating on the proposed revisions; advised that the applicant
was reluctant to add additional building materials on the siding of the building which had
been requested by staff; for Commissioner Mathewson, confirmed that the sole design
concern of staff that the applicant did not address was associated with the request to
incorporate additional building materials (i.e., stonework, masonry, slate, or tile) on the
building, reiterating that the alternate concerns had been addressed to a minimum
satisfaction; noted that per discussions with the applicant, the applicant was agreeable
to installing furniture in the employee lunch area. Director of Planning Ubnoske clarifying
that the project under Agenda Item No. 4 had been conditioned to install furniture in the
employee area while this project was not, solely due to the projects having different
planners, noting that the Planning Commission could relay any concerns to staff in order
to assure that the issue would be addressed.
Mr. Vince Maganuco, representing the applicant, noted in response to Commissioner
Mathewson's queries, that the employee eating area would be provided with a picnic
bench and a table; with respect to staff's recommendation to further enhance the
building's articulation, relayed that it was the applicant's opinion that this addition would
not further enhance the design; and specified the various improvements added due to
staff's requests (i.e., sandblasting, concrete columns, overhead beams, and an
enhanced entryway.)
Commenting on the project design meeting minimal design standards, Commissioner
Guerriero noted the need for additional articulation to break up the massing,
recommending that the applicant work with staff to enhance the building design.
Expressing appreciation to staff and the applicant for the efforts to improve the original
submitted design plan, Commissioner Mathewson relayed that meeting the minimal
design standards was not an endorsement for implementing quality design; and
concurred with Commissioner Guerriero, noting that the massing of the building needed
to be addressed, specifically relaying that the windows on the second floor appeared to
be undersized and inappropriate, and that there did not appear to be any crown work on
the top of the parapet to provide visual interest.
Commissioner Olhasso noted her concurrence with the previous Commission
comments.
While concurring with the previous comments, in particular to the windows being
undersized, Vice Chairman Telesio relayed appreciation to the applicant for the efforts
thus far to address various concerns of staff.
For Vice Chairman Telesio, Director of Planning Ubnoske relayed that the minimum
design guidelines are a starting point, confirming that the applicant had been informed
that the Planning Commission, as well as the City Council, had higher design standards
and has raised the bar with respect to meeting the minimum requirements; and noted
that at a future point the City's Design Guidelines would be updated.
Providing additional information regarding the Planning Commission review process,
Assistant City Attorney Curley noted that as well as evaluating whether a proposed
project met specific criteria (i.e., setback requirements, and consistency with the City's
planning ordinances) the Commission also reviews more subjective aspects of a project
per the General Plan's goals and policies which is also part of the review process.
MOTION: Commissioner Mathewson moved to continue this item to the April 24th
Planning Commission meeting in order for the applicant to work with staff to enhance the
architectural design of the project. The motion was seconded by Commissioner OIhasso
and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Chairman Chiniaeff who was
absent.
4 Planninq Application No. 01-0309 (Development Plan) - Rick Rush Proiect Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Adopt a Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. 01-0309 pursuant to
Section 15332 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines;
4.2 Adopt a Resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2002-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. 01-0309, DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO
CONSTRUCT, ESTABLISH AND OPERATE A 16,200
INDUSTRIAL/ WAREHOUSE BUILDING ON 1.09
VACANT ACRES GENERALLY LOCATED ON
WINCHESTER ROAD NORTH OF COLT COURT AND
SOUTH OF ZEVO DRIVE KNOWN AS ASSESSORS
PARCEL NO. 909-360-020
Via overheads, Project Planner Rush provided an overview of the project plan (per
agenda material), noting the site location, the access, the parking, the loading zone and
the trash enclosure which would not be visible from the public right-of-way; relayed that
due to staff's concerns the applicant has increased the overall landscape plan from 20%
to 25%, advising that landscaping was added along the south and west side of the
building, as well as along the front elevation which would be visible from Winchester
Road; with respect to the proposed architectural design, specified staff's concerns
regarding the original submittal, noting that the applicant has made revisions to the
architecture to meet the minimum standards of the Development Code and Design
Guidelines, relaying that five-foot offsets were added along the southern and northern
property line, the office portion of the project was relocated, a sandblast material was
added to the office portion of the project, as well as a concrete tile roof, windows o1
varying sizes were proposed, the roll-up doors were relocated to the rear of the building
in order to not be visible from Winchester Road, and the paint colors were revised to
reflect a beige with a brown reveal line; and advised that staff opined that the applicant
should have provided a more creative entry statement and introduced more materials
into the project to create visual interest.
Mr. Vince Maganuco, representing the applicant commented on the monetary limits of
the project due to this being a speculative building; noted the applicant's desire to make
any necessary revisions in order to get approval of the project plan; and requested that
the Planning Commission provide specific direction regarding desired modifications.
Commissioner Olhasso advised that the front section of the building appeared to have a
1970's style architecture; for informational purposes, noted that via the California
Manufacturing Technology Cente, r Iow cost architectural services were available for
projects of this type; and in response to the fact that the applicant did not utilize the
services of an architect for this project, advised that the need for a good architect was
clearly evident with this particular proposal.
Concurring with Commissioner Olhasso's comments, Commissioner Mathewson
specified the elements which should be addressed, as follows: the massing of the walls,
the lack of a crowning treatment, the appearance of the office being an add-on structure,
the window treatments, and the add-on roof appearance.
For Vice Chairman Telesio, Project Planner Rush specified staff's recommended
revisions to the project which had been relayed to the applicant while not implemented
(i.e., additional sandblasting along the elevations, a varying panel color application, and
metal roofing on the office portion of the project which would be consistent with the
adjacent building.)
In response to Mr. Maganuco's comments, Vice Chairman Telesio acknowledged that
there were alternate buildings in this area with lower design standards than were being
imposed on this project, clarifying that these projects had been approved in the past and
that this Planning Commission has consistently and incrementally recommended a
higher quality of design. Commissioner Olhasso providing additional information
regarding the evolution of alternate cities, as well as Temecula, in upgrading design
standards as the communities become more fully developed.
MOTION: Commissioner Mathewson moved to continue this item to the April 24th
Planning Commission meeting in order for the applicant to work with staff to enhance the
architectural design of the project. The motion was seconded by Commissioner
Guerriero and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Chairman Chiniaeff
who was absent.
COMMISSIONER'S REPORTS
Commissioner Guerriero relayed that the Monterey Planning Conference had
been a great experience, and much improved from last year's event.
For Commissioner OIhasso, Deputy Director of Public Works Parks provided an
update regarding upcoming improvements on Highway 79 (South), noting that
Caltrans would be constructing a raised median from the 1-15 Freeway to
Butterfield Stage Road, advising that the City was working with Caltrans,
investigating as to whether the City could supplement the project with additional
funds to include landscaping in the medians.
With respect to the Monterey Conference, Vice Chairman Telesio concurred with
Commissioner Guerriero that it had been better than last year's event; advised
that the allocation of the meeting rooms should be revised, noting that the more
popular topic meetings were scheduled in the smaller rooms which restricted
seating while the less attended meetings had been scheduled in larger rooms;
and noted that he had relayed a recommendation to modify the allocation of
rooms.
In response to Commissioner Guerriero, Fire Battalion Chief Ahmad noted that
while at this time the City of Temecula does not charge a Hazardous Materials
Fee, that this issue was being evaluated and that he would keep the Planning
Commission updated. Director of Planning Ubnoske relaying that the City would
be updating the entire fee schedule in the near future, advising that the fees have
not be revised since the City's incorporation.
PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT
Director of Planning Ubnoske relayed that there would potentially be a Villages of
Old Town Project Workshop in May.
Apprising the Planning Commission regarding the project'S process, Director of
Planning Ubnoske advised that the Roripaugh EIR had recently been submitted
to the State.
For Commissioner Mathewson, Director of Planning Ubnoske relayed that the
recently Planning Commission approved mixed use project (with an apartment
complex as well as a gas station) would be going forward to City Council in order
for staff to obtain direction, advising that the applicant was in the process of
implementing various changes the Planning Commission had recommended
prior to City Council presentation.
ADJOURNMENT
At 6:52 P.M. Vice Chairman Telesio formally adjourned this meeting to the next reqular
meetinq to be held on Wednesday, AI3ril 24, 2002 at 6:00 P.M., in the City Council
Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula.
Dennis W. Chiniaeff,
Chairman
Debbie Ubnoske,
Director of Planning
ITEM 3
R:\PLANCOMM'~Agendas~2002\4-24-02.doc
6
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OFTEMECULA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENTDEPARTMENT
PLANNING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM
Planning Comm, i~i~
Debbie Ubnosl~irector of Planning
April 24, 2002
Director's Hearing Case Update
Planning Director's Agenda items for February and Mamh 2002
February 28, 2002
PA01-0453 Tentative Pamel Map for two residential
lots
The Legacy
Group, Inc.
Approved
Mamh 14, 2002
PA00-0509
A Development Plan to construct a 5,200
square foot retail building on a 20,000
square foot lot located at the existing
Winchester Meadows Shopping Center.
WM 15
Partners, LP
Approved
March 21,2002
PA01-0507
Development Plan to design, construct
and operate a 9,998 square foot office
building on 1.0 acre of vacant land.
Crystal
Ridge
Development
Approved
March 21, 2002
PA01-0571
Conditional Use Permit to convert and
occupy an existing two-story, 45,000
square foot industrial building on a 3.88-
acre pamel into a chumh facility
consisting of a 13,571 square foot chapel
for 407 people and related classrooms
and offices; and a Development Plan to
construct a 451 space parking lot on six
(8) contiguous vacant lots totaling
approximately six (6) acres to be
developed in phases.
Sunridge
Community
Church
Approved
R AD IR H EA R~VIEM O~2002~Feb 2002.memo.doc
I
Mamh 21,2002
March 21, 2002
Mamh 21,2002
March 21,2002
March 28,2002
PA01-0573
PA01-0612
PA01-0613
PA02-0113
PA01-0588
Application to replace an existing 80' high
wood baseball field lighting pole with a
new 80' high steel lighting pole to contain
six flush mounted cellular telephone
antennas at a 40' height and construct a
related 10' x 16' telecommunications
equipment structure.
Product Review for 80 SFR located on
the north portion of TTM 23209.
Product Review for 140 SFR located on
the south portion of TTM, 23209.
Minor Conditional Use Permit to operate a
kitchen and retail and bath showroom in
an existing building located at 43475
Business Park Drive
Minor Conditional Use Permit for the
collocation of wireless antennas on an
existing Sprint Monopine for Verizon
Wireless.
Compass
Telecom
Services
Shea Homes
Shea Homes
Pacific Sales
Kitchen and
Bath
Verizon
Wireless
Approved
Approved
Approved
Approved
Approved
Attachments:
1. Action Agendas - Blue Page 2
R:'tD IR H EA RXM EMOX2002'~Feb 2002.memo.doc
2
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
ACTION AGENDAS
R:'xl) IR HEAR'uM EM O~2002~Feb 2002.memo.doc
3
ACTION AGENDA
TEMECULA DIRECTOR'S HEARING
REGULAR MEETING
February 28, 2002 1:30 PM
TEMECULA CITY HALL MAIN CONFERENCE ROOM
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
CALL TO ORDER: Don Hazen, Senior Planner
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address to the Planning
Manager on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3)
minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Senior Planner about an item not listed on the
Agenda, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Senior
Planner.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state vour name and address.
For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the Senior Planner
before that item is heard. There is a three (3) minute time limit for individual speakers.
Item No. 1:
Case Number:
Case Name:
Applicant:
Proposal:
Location:
Intended Environmental Action:
Assessor's Parcel Number:
Case Planner:
Status:
Comments:
ACTION:
PA01-0453
Parcel Map 30178
The Legacy Group Inc., Larry Slusser
43232 Brockway Dr. Temecula CA. 92592.
Tentative Parcel Map for two residential lots.
Ormsby Road north of Santiago in Chaparral Estates.
The environmental action will be determined once the project
has been deemed complete.
945-080-011
Rick Rush, Project Planner
X New Project
Re-submittal: Previous DRC Date:
APPROVED
P:~PLANN/NG\DIRHEA R~002\02-28-02 AGENDA..dac
ACTION AGENDA
TEMECULA DIRECTOR'S HEARING
REGULAR MEETING
March14,20021:30PM
TEMECULA CITY HALL MAIN CONFERENCE ROOM
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
CALL TO ORDER: Don Hazen, Senior Planner
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address to the Planning
Manager on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3)
minutes each. tf you desire to speak to the Senior Planner about an item not listed on the
Agenda, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Senior
Planner.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state vour name and address.
For all other agenda items a "Request Go Speak" form must be filed with the Senior Planner
before that item is heard. There is a three (3) minute time limit for individual speakers.
Item No. 1:
Case No:
Applicant:
Location:
Proposal:
Environmental Action:
Case Planner:
Case Engineer:
ACTION:
PA00-0509
WM 15 Partners, L.P.
Located on the north side of Winchester and west of Roripaugh Road
A Development Plan to construct a 5,200 square foot retai~ building
on a 20,000 square foot lot, located at the existing Winchester
Meadows Shopping center (APN 911-770-010)
This project is exempt from CEQA review due to Class 32
Categorical
Exemption 15332 (In-Fill Development Project)
Rick Rush, Project Planner
Annie Bostre-Le, Assistant Engineer
Approved
P:~LANNING~DIRHEAR~2002\03-14432 AGENDA..doc
ACTION AGENDA
TEMECULA DIRECTOR'S HEARING
REGULAR MEETING
March21,20021:30PM
TEMECULA CITY HALL MAIN CONFERENCE ROOM
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
CALL TO ORDER: Don Hazen, Senior Planner
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address to the Planning
Manager on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3)
minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Senior Planner about an item not listed on the
Agenda, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Senior
Planner.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address.
For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the Senior Planner
before that item is heard. There is a three (3) minute time limit for individual speakers.
Item No. 1:
Case No:
Applicant:
Location:
Proposal:
Environmental Action:
Case Planner:
Case Engineer:
ACTION:
· PA01-0507 (Development Plan)
Crystal Ridge Development
Located on Ridge Park Drive south of Rancho California Road
Planning Application to design, construct, and operate a 9,998
square foot Office Building on 1.0 acre of vacant land.
Notice of Exemption per California Environmental Quality Act Article
19 Categorical Exemptions Section 15332 Class 32 In-fill
Development Projects.
Rick Rush, Project Planner
Mayra De La Torre
APPROVED
Item No. 2:
Case No:
Applicant:
Location:
Proposal:
Environmental Action:
Case Planner:
ACTION:
Planning Application PA01-0571
Sunridge Community Chumh
North side of Winchester Road, south side of Zevo Drive, westerly of
Diaz Road.
Conditional Use Permit to convert and occupy an existing two-story,
45,000 square foot industrial building on a 3.88-acre parcel into a
church facility consisting of a 13,571 square foot chapel for 407
people and related classrooms and offices; and a Development Plan
to construct a 451 space parking lot on six (6) contiguous vacant lots
· totaling approximately 6 acres to be developed in phases.
The intended environmental action is to deem the project
categorically exempt from CEQA per Sections 15301 (Existing
Facilities) and 15304 (Minor Alterations to Land).
Rolfe Preisendanz
APPROVED
P:~PLANN1NG~DIRHEAR~2002\03-21-02 AGENDA..dec
Item No. 3:
Case No:
Applicant:
Location:
Proposal:
Environmental Action:
Case Planner:
ACTION:
Planning Application PA01-0573
Compass Telecom Services
Southerly of Rancho Vista Road, westerly of Margarita Road at
Rancho California Sports Park
Application to replace an existing 80' high wood baseball field lighting
pole with a new 80' high steel lighting pole to contain six flush-
mounted cellular telephone antennas at a 40' height and construct a
related 10'xl 6' telecommunications equipment structure.
Staff has deemed the project categorically exempt from CEQA per
Sections 15301 (Existing Facilities)
Rolfe Preisendanz
APPROVED
Item No. 4:
Case No:
Applicant:
Location:
Proposal:
Environmental Action:
Case Planner:
ACTION:
PA01-0612 (Development Plan)
Shea Homes
Located at the northeast corner of La Serena Way and Walcott Lane
Planning Application for a Product Review for 80 SFR located on the
north portion of TTM 23209.
Determination of Consistency with a project for which a Negative
Declaration was previously adopted (Sec. 15162 - Subsequent EIRs
and Negative Declarations).
Rick Rush, Project Planner
APPROVED
Item No. 5:
Case No:
Applicant:
Location:
Proposal:
Environmental Action:
Case Planner:
ACTION:
PA01-0613 (Development Plan)
Shea Homes
Located at the northeast corner of La Serena Way and Walcott Lane
Planning Application for a Product Review for 140 SFR located on
the south portion of TTM 23209.
Determination of Consistency with a project for which a Negative
Declaration was previously adopted (Sec. 15162 - Subsequent EIRs
and Negative Declarations).
Rick Rush, Project Planner
APPROVED
Item No. 6:
Case No:
Applicant:
Location:
Proposal:
Environmental Action:
Case Planner:
ACTION:
PA02-0113 (Minor Conditional Use Permit)
Pacific Sales Kitchen & Bath
Located at 43475 Business Park Drive
A Minor Conditional Use Permit to operate a kitchen retail and bath
showroom in an existing building located at 43475 Business Park
Drive; Submitted by Pacific Sales.
Determination of Consistency with a project for which a Negative
Declaration was previously adopted (Sec. 15162 - Subsequent EIRs
and Negative Declarations).
Rick Rush, Project Planner
APPROVED
P:~PLANN ING~DIRHEARk2002~03-21-02 AGENDA_doc
2
ACTION AGENDA
TEMECULA DIRECTOR'S HEARING
REGULAR MEETING
March28,20021:30PM
TEMECULA CITY HALL MAIN CONFERENCE ROOM
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
CALL TO ORDER: Don Hazen, Senior Planner
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address to the Planning
Manager on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3)
minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Senior Planner about an item no_.jt listed on the
Agenda, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Senior
Planner.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and State your name and address.
For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the Senior Planner
before that item is heard. There is a three (3) minute time limit for individual speakers.
Item No. 1:
:Case No:
Applicant:
Location:
Proposal:
Environmental Action:
Case Planner:
ACTION:
PA01-0588 (Minor Conditional Use Permit)
Verizon Wireless
South of Intersection of Margarita and Rancho California
Planning Application requesting a Minor Conditional Use Permit for
the collocation of wireless antennas on an existing Sprint Monopine
for Verizon Wireless
This project is exempt from CEQA review due to Class 32
Categorical Exemption 15332 (In-fill Development Project)
Rick Rush
APPROVED
P:~PLANNING\D IRHEARk2002\03 -28-02 AGENDA..doc
ITEM 6
R:\PLANCOMM~Agendas~-002\4-24-02.doc
6
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
April 24, 2002
Planning Application No. 01-0445
(Extension of Time)
Prepared By: Thomas Thornsley, Associate Planner
RECOMMENDATION: ' The Director of Planning recommends the Planning Commission:
ADOPT a Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. 01-0445
(Extension of Time) based on the Determination of Consistency with
a project for which a Negative Declaration was previously adopted
pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 - Subsequent EIR's
and Negative Declarations.
2. ADOPT a Resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 2001-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO.
PA01-0445 (THE SECOND ONE YEAR EXTENSION OF TIME),
FOR PA97-0420 (DEVELOPMENT PLAN) TO CONSTRUCT AND
OPERATE A SENIOR APPARTMENT BUILDING, TWO MEDICAL
OFFICE BUILDINGS TOTALING 27,700 SQUARE FEET, 69
INDEPENDENT CARE HOUSING UNITS WITH A DETACHED
CLUBHOUSE AND POOL (380,859 TOTAL SQUARE FEET) WITH
ASSOCIATED PARKING AND LANDSCAPING ON A PARCEL
CONTAINING 22.62 ACRES LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST
CORNER OF LOMA LINDA AND PALA ROADS, KNOWN AS
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.S 961-010-014 AND 961-010-015.
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
PROPOSAL:
Daniel Lomax, 2390 Willits Road, Alpine, CA 91901
A request for a second one year Extension of Time for the
design and construction and operation of a senior care facility
consisting of a 121 unit assisted care facility building, a 141
unit senior apartment building, two medical office buildings
totaling 27,700 square feet, an Alzheimer's facility of 7,200
square feet, 69 independent care housing units with a
detached clubhouse and pool, with associated parking and
landscaping on a 22.62 acre site (380,859 total building
square footage).
LOCATION:
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION:
EXISTING ZONING:
SURROUNDING ZONING:
PROPOSED ZONING:
EXISTING LAND USE:
PROJECT STATISTICS
Total Area:
Total Site Area:
Building Area:
Landscape Area:
Paved Parking Area:
Floor Area Ratio (FAR):
Parking Required:
Parking Provided:
Building Height:
Unit Sizes:
Attached Condominium:
The northwest corner of Loma Linda and Pala Roads.
PO (Professional Office)
PO (Professional Office)
North: LM (Low Medium Residential)
South: Specific Plan- Wolf Creek
East: PO (Professional Office)
West: LM (Low Medium Residential)
Not requested
Residential
22.628 gross acres
20.398 net acres
380,859 square feet
413,400 square feet
139,00(3 square feet
0.43
348 parking spaces
400 parking spaces
Medical Buildings:
Alzheimer Clinic:
Assisted Care Facility (ACF):
Senior Apartments:
Independent Care Housing
Club House:
Thirty-Seven (37) Feet
Eighteen (18) Feet
Forty-one (41) Feet
Forty-one (41) Feet
Twenty-Seven (27) Feet
Twenty- Two (22) Feet
Assisted Care and Apartment Buildings:
Studio: 398 square feet
Alcove: 500 square feet
One Bedroom: 625 square feet
Two Bedroom: 925 square feet
Two Bedroom/1.5 Baths:
One Car garage:
900 square feet
250 square feet
BACKGROUND
The Planning Commission originally approved Planning Application 97-0420 on October 7, 1998,
and granted a one year Extension of Time which was due to expire again on October 7, 2001. The
second Extension of Time for PA97-0420 was submitted to the Planning Department but was
deemed incomplete and the missing material was submitted to the City January 22, 2002. If
R:\E O T~2001~01-0445 Alpine Gardens East 2nd EOT'~Staff Report.doc
2
approved this application will expire on October 7, 2002 and a final application for time extension will
be required if building permits are not issued prior to expiration. The Development Code permits up
to three one-year time extensions.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed project is for the design, construction and operation of a senior care facility consisting
of a 121 unit assisted care facility buildir~g, a 141 unit senior apartment building, two medical office
buildings totaling 27,700 square feet, an Alzheimer's facility of 7,200 square feet, 69 independent
care housing units with a detached clubhouse and pool, with associated parking and landscaping on
a 22.82 acre site. The total square footage of building area is 380,859 square feet.
The proposed senior care facility is an age-in-place concept development. For example, the project
provides condominiums for seniors that are completely independent and ambulatory, smaller
apartment units once the condominium becomes too large (~r too much to care for, and assisted
care units for seniors that require additional or continual medical assistance. The project also
provides on-site medical offices and an Alzheimer clinic to service the needs of the residents so they
do not have to travel.
The assisted care and apartment buildings offer a variety of units with different sizes. The smallest
unit is a studio with a combined living/sleeping area with approximately 398 square feet. The next
size is an alcove unit, which offers a small, separate bedroom and a living area with approximately
500 square feet. The one bedroom unit offers approximately 620 square feet, and the two
bedrooms offer 925 square feet. The attached condominium units are all 900 square feet and offer
two bedrooms and one and a half baths with a one-car garage of two hundred and fifty square feet.
The project provides extensive on-site amenities such as walking paths with benches; garden areas;
outdoor activity areas such' as croquet or lawn bowling; large, park-like landscaped areas, water
features and health and personal hygiene services such as barber and beauty salons. There will
also be a variety of bus and shuttle services to meet any off-site needs of the residents.
ANALYSIS
This project still complies with the City's Development Code and the findings for a Development
Plan. However, during the review of the time extension request, the Public Works, Building and
Safety Departments, and Community Services have requested amending certain Conditions of
Approval to reflect changes in current activities and/or codes.
Public Work's requests amending condition #50 requiring the developer to improve the existing
channel along Pala Road, due to the City's Capital Improvement Project currently planned for Pala
Road.
The Building and Safety Department is requiring that the development of this project comply with the
latest edition of the Building Codes (1998) and the California Disabled Access Regulations (April 1,
1998) adopted by the City. These conditions have been incorporated in the Conditions of Approval.
Community Services has requested modifying some of their original conditions (conditions no. 92,
93, 96 and 99) to updating them to their current criteria for park land and maintenances, and to add
new conditions (conditions no. 94, 95 and 97) related to installing bike lanes and using the City's
franchise solid waste hauler.
R:~E O T~.001~01-0445 Alpine Gardens East 2nd EO%Staff Report.doc
3
EXISTING ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION
The General Plan Land Use designation for the site is Professional Office (PO). Existing zoning for
the site is Professional Office (PO). Senior Care Facilities are permitted with the approval of a
development plan pursuant to Chapter 17 of the Development Code. The project as proposed is
consistent with the Development Code, General Plan and Design Guidelines.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
A Mitigated Negative Declaration was adopted for the PA97-0420. Per Section 15162 of the
California Environmental Quality Act, when a Negative Declaration has been adopted for a project,
no subsequent Negative Declaration need be prepared for that project unless the lead agency
determines, on the basis of substantial evidence in the light of the whole record, that substantial
changes have occurred in the project or new environmental information of substantial importance
has been discovered. Staff has determined that no new changes or information are present that
would require any new environmental action.
SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS
The project has been determined by staff to be consistent with applicable City policies, standards
and guidelines. Staff believes it is still compatible with the nature and quality of surrounding
development, and will represent an attractive addition to the surrounding area. Staff recommends
approval of the time extension with the modified conditions and previous mitigation measures.
FINDINGS-DEVELOPMENTPLAN
Th~ proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with ali
applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. The project is
consistent with all City Ordinances including: the City's Development Code, Ordinance No.
655 (Mt. Palomar Lighting Ordinance), and the City's Water Efficient Landscaping
provisions.
The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety
and welfare. The project as proposed complies with all City Ordinances and meets the
standards adopted by the City of Temecula designed for the protection of the public health,
safety and welfare.
Attachments:
Planning Commission Resolution No. 2001-_ - Blue Page 5
Exhibit A Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 8
Initial Environmental Study dated September 10, 1998- Blue Page 9
Mitigation Monitoring Program PA97-0420 - Blue Page 10
Exhibits - Blue Page 11
A. Vicinity Map
B. Zoning Map
C. General Plan
D. Site Plan
R:\E O T~.001 \01-0445 Alpine Gardens East 2nd EOT~Staff Report,doc
4
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2002-
APPROVING PA01-0445
(EXTENSION OF TIME)
R:~E O T~2001\01~0445 Alpine Gardens East 2nd EOT~Staff Report.doc
5
ATI'ACHMENT NO. 1
RESOLUTION NO. 2001-_
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO.
PA01-0445 (THE SECOND ONE YEAR EXTENSION OF TIME),
FOR PA97-0420 (DEVELOPMENT PLAN) TO CONSTRUCT AND
OPERATE A SENIOR APPARTMENT BUILDING, TWO MEDICAL
OFFICE BUILDINGS TOTALING 27,700 SQUARE FEET, 69
INDEPENDENT CARE HOUSING UNITS WITH A DETACHED
CLUBHOUSE AND POOL (380,859 TOTAL SQUARE FEET) WITH
ASSOCIATED PARKING AND LANDSCAPING ON A PARCEL
CONTAINING 22.62 ACRES LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST
CORNER OF LOMALINDA AND PALA ROADS, KNOWN AS
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.S 961-010-014 AND 961-010-015.
WHEREAS, Daniel Lomax, initiated Planning Application No. PA01-0445 (Extension of
Time), in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code;
WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PA01-0445 (Extension of Time) was processed
including, but not limited to public notice, in the timely manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, notice of the proposed Extension of Time was posted at City Hall, Temecula
Library, Pujol Street Community Center, and the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commeme;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing pertaining to Planning
Application No. PA01-0445 (Extension of Time) on April 24, 2002, at which time interested pemons
had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support or opposition to this proposal;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the
testimony, the Commission approved Planning Application No. 01-0445;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES
RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by
reference.
Section 2. Findinqs. The Planning Commission, in approving Planning Application No. 01-
0445 hereby concludes that the original findings for Planning Application 97-0420 still apply.
A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all
applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. The project is consistent
with ail City Ordinances including: the City's Development Code, Ordinance No. 655 (Mt. Palomar
Lighting Ordinance), and the City's Water Efficient Landscaping provisions.
B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public
health, safety and welfare. The project as proposed complies with all City Ordinances and meets
the standards adopted by the City of Temecula designed for the protection of the public health,
safety and welfare.
R:\E O T~2001\01-0445 Alpine Gardens East 2nd EOT~Staff Report.doc
6
Section 3. Environmental Compliance. A Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No.
01-0445 was made per the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15162. This
section applies when a Negative Declaration has been previously adopted and there are no
substantial changes to the project; no new significant environmental effects requiring revision of the
Negative Declaration; and the Negative Declaration is deemed adequate for the project being
considered.
Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby approves
Planning Application No. PA01-0445 for the second Extension of Time for Planning Application No.
PA97-0420, a Development Plan to design, construction and operation of a senior care facility
consisting of a 121 unit assisted care facility building, a 141 unit senior apartment building, two
medical office buildings totaling 27,700 square feet, an Alzheimer's facility of 7,200 square feet, 69
independent care housing units with a detached clubhouse and pool (total building square footage
of 380,859), with associated parking and on a proposed parcel containing 22.62 acres located at the
northwest corner of Loma Linda and Pala Roads, known as Assessor's Parcel No. 961-010-014 and
961-010-015, subject to Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference and
made a part hereof.
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning
Commission this 24~h day of April, 2002.
ATTEST:
Ron Guerriero, Chairperson
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
{SEAL}
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
City of Temecula )
I, Debbie U bnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that
PC Resolution No. 01-. was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City
of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 24th day of April, 2002, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
R:\E O 'r~2001\01-0445 Alpine Gardens East 2nd EOT~Staff Report.doe
7
EXHIBIT A
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
R:\E O T~.001\01-0445 Alpine Gardens Fast 2nd EO~Staff Report.doc
8
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No. 01-0445 (Extension of Time)
Project Description:
The design, construction and operation of a senior care facility
consisting of a 121 unit assisted care facility building, a 141 unit
senior apartment building, two medical office buildings totaling
27,700 square feet, an Alzheimer's facility of 7,200 square feet,
69 independent care housing units with a detached clubhouse
and pool with associated parking, and on a proposed parcel
containing 22.62 acres located at the northwest corner of Loma
Linda and Pala Roads (total building square footage is 380,859).
Assessor's Parcel No.: 961-010-014 and 961-010-015
Approval Date: October 7, 2001
Expiration Date: October 7, 2002
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project
The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money
order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of One Thousand Three Hundred
Twenty~Eight Dollars ($1,328.00) which includes the One Thousand Two Hundred and Fifty
Dollar ($1,250.00) fee, required by Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(d)(3) plus the Seventy-
Eight Dollars ($78.00) County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of
Determination for the Mitigated or Negative Declaration required under Public Resources
Code Section 21108(a) and California Code of Regulations Section 15075. If within said forty-
eight (48) hour period the applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Department
the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of
failure of (~ondition, Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c).
General Requirements
The developer/applicant shall indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless, the City and any
agenoy or instrumentality thereof, and/or any of its officers, employees and agents from any
and all claims, actions, or proceedings against the City, or any agency or instrumentality
thereof, or any of its officers, employees and agents, to attack, set aside, void, annul, or seek
monetary damages resulting from an approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality
thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the
voters of the City, concerning Planning Application No. PA97-0420 (Development Plan). City
shall promptly notify the developer/applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding for which
indemnification is sought and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action.
3. This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall
become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated
R:~E O TO.001\0142445 Alpine Gardens East 2nd EO'I~COA.doc
10.
by this approval within the two (2) year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to
completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval.
Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the satisfaction of the
Planning Manager. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the
Planning Manager shall have the authority to require the property owner to bring the
landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan.
The development of the premises shall conform substantially with Exhibit D, or as amended by
these conditions.
A minimum of three hundred forty eight (348) parking spaces shall be provided.
Landscaping shall conform substantially with Exhibit E, or as amended by these conditions.
Building elevations shall conform substantially with Exhibit G (color rendering), or as amended
by these conditions.
If the assisted care, apartment buildings, or condominium units are converted to a different
use as a result of local market demands, any exterior, structural, unit mix, square footage or
floor plan changes shall be approved by the Community Development Director.
Colors and materials used shall conform substantially with Exhibit H, or as amended by these
conditions (color and material board). The applicant shall work with staff to add additional trim
colors that are non-monochromatic (no gray colors) to the sixty-nine (69) condominium units
only. (Added by the Planning Commission October 7, 1998).
Materials
(A) Stucco
(B) Stucco Reveal
(C) Metal Railing
(D) Amhitectural Ornaments
(E) Window Frames
(F) Fascia Board and Gutters
(G) Roof Shingles
(H) Doors and Frames
(I) Balcony Scuppers
(J) Timber Overheads
(K) Architectural Columns, Downspouts & Flashing
(L) Architectural Window Molding
(M) Aluminum Storefronts
(N) Aluminum Storefronts
(O) Stucco
(P) Concrete Roof Tile
(Q) Garage Doors
(R) Wood Siding
Colors
Ivory (#57)
Cape Cod Grey
Cape Cod Grey
Grey
White
Cape Cod Grey
Gray Blend
White
Terracotta
Cape Cod Grey
Ivory
Cape Cod Grey
White
Dark Bronze
Dark Ivory
Grey Blend
White
Ivory
R:~E O TL2001\014}445 Alpine Gardens East 2nd EOTx, COA.doc
2
Prior to the Issuance of Grading Permits
11. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal
Code (Habitat Conservation).
12.
The applicant shall demonstrate by submittal of a written report that all mitigation measures
identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program have been satisfied for this stage of the
development.
Prior to the Issuance of Building Permits
13. A Consistency Check fee shall be paid.
14. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted to the
Planning Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School Mitigation Fees.
15.
Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be submitted to the
Planning Department for approval and shall be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee. The
location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. These
plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The cover page shall identify the
total square footage of the landscaped area for the site.
16.
The applicant shall demonstrate by submittal of a written report that all mitigation measures
identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program have been satisfied for this stage of the
development.
Prior to the Issuance of Occupancy Permits
17. An application for a comprehensive sign program shall be submitted and approved by the
Planning Manager.
18. Roof-mounted equipment shall be inspected to ensure it is shielded from ground view.
19.
All landscaped areas shall be planted in accordance with approved landscape, irrigation, and
shading plants. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The
irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working order.
20.
Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently affixed
reflectorized sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying the
International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square inches in
area and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space at a minimum height if 80
inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space finished grade, or centered at a
minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space finished grade, ground, or sidewalk. A
sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each entrance to the off-street parking
facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches, clearly and conspicuously stating the following:
"Unauthorized vehicles parked in designated accessible spaces not
displaying distinguishing placards or license plates issued for
persons with disabilities may be towed away at owner's expense.
Towed vehicles may be reclaimed by telephoning 909 696-3000."
R:kE 0 ~k200I\01-0445 Alpine Gardens East 2nd EOT~COA.doc
3
In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall have a surface
identification sign duplicating the Symbol of Accessibility in blue paint of at least 3 square feet
in size.
21.
Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Planning to guarantee
the installation of plantings, walls, and fences in accordance with the approved plan, and
adequate maintenance of the planting for one year, shall be filed with the Department of
Planning.
22. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by
this permit.
23. The applicant shall demonstrate by submittal of a'{Nritten report that all mitigation measures
identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program have been satisfied for this stage of the
development.
BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT
24.
Comply with applicable provisions of the 1998 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and
Mechanical Codes; 1998 National Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24
Energy and Disabled Access Regulations and the Temecula Municipal Code. (Amended by
Planning Commission on 4/24102)
25. Submit at time of plan review complete extedor site lighting plans in compliance with ordinance
number 655 for the regulation of light pollution.
26. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction
work.
27. The Occupancy classification of the proposed buildings shall be R-I/B/I-1.1/A-3.
28. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review.
29. Provide demolition permits for all existing buildings that will be removed prior to the demolition
(i.e. finaled building permits or Certificate of Occupancy)
30.
All building and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations. Provide all
details on plans. (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1, 1998) (Amended
by Planning Commission on 4/24/02)
31. Provide disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of all building.
32. Provide van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entry.
33. Show path of accessibility from parking to furthest point of improvement.
34. Provide house electrical meter provisions for power for the operation of exterior lighting, fire
alarm systems.
R:\E O TX2001\01 ~.45 Alpine Gardens East 2nd EOT~COA.doc
4
35.
Restroom fixtures, number and type, to be in accordance with the provisions of the 1998
edition of the Uniform Plumbing Code, Appendix C. (Amended by Planning Commission on
4124102)
36. Provide an approved automatic fire sprinkler system.
37. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans
submitted for plan review.
38. Provide electrical plan including load calcs and panel schedule, plumbing schematic and
mechanical plan for plan review.
39. Truss calculations that are stamped by the engineer of record and the truss manufacturer
engineer are required at time of plan submittal for plan review.
40. Provide precise grading plan for plan check submittal to check for handicap accessibility.
41. A preconstruction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the
building construction.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Unless otherwise noted, all conditions shall be cor~pleted by the Developer at no cost to any
Government Agency. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the site plan all existing
and proposed property lines, easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage
courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and revision.
General Requirements
42.
A Grading Permit for either roug,h and/or precise grading, including all on-site flat work and
improvements, shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained street right-of-way.
43: An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way.
44.
All improvement plans, grading plans, and raised landscaped median plans shall be
coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existipg improvements contiguous to
the site and shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars.
45. The vehicular movement for the proposed southerly driveway on Loma Linda Road is
restricted to right in/right out only.
Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit
46.
A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Enginee'r and shall be reviewed and
approved by the Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include all necessary
erosion control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and private property.
R:'tE O Tk2001\01-0445 Alpine Gardens East 2nd EOTxCOA.doc
5
47.
The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and
erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to
approval by the Department of Public Works.
48.
A Soil Report shall be prepared by a registered Soil or Civil Engineer and submitted to the
Director of the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall
address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the construction of
engineered structures and pavement sections.
49.
The Developer shall have a Drainage Study prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in
accordance with City Standards identifying storm water runoff expected from this site and
upstream of this site. The study shall identify all existing or proposed public or private
drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. The study shall also analyze and identify
impacts to adjacent properties and provide specific recommendations to protect the properties
and mitigate any impacts. Any upgrading or upsizing of downstream facilities caused by
project impacts, including acquisition of drainage or access easements necessary to make
required improvements, shall be provided by the Developer.
50.
If construction of the City of Temecula Capital Improvement Project No. PW99-11 has not
occurred prior to the development of this project, the Developer shall improve the existing
channel along Pala Road as necessary to provide adequate capacity to safely convey tributary
storm flows to an adequate outlet. The design of this facility shall also include an analysis of
the impact to downstream facilities. If the downstream facilities are adversely impacted by this
project, upsizing or the installation of additional drainage facilities may be necessary.
(Amended by Planning Commission on 4/24/02)
51.
The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No
grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or the project
is shown to be exempt.
52. As deemed necessary by the Director of ~he Department of Public Works, the Developer shall
receive written clearance from the following agencies:
· San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board
· Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
· Planning Department
· Department of Public Works
53. The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an Environmental
Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject property.
54. The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or slope easements for off-site
work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public Works.
55.
The site is in an area identified on the Flood Insurance Rate Map as Flood Zone AE and Zone
AH. This project shall comply with Chapter 15, Section 15.12 of the City Municipal Code which
may include obtaining a Letter of Map Revision from FEMA. A Flood Plain Development
Permit shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval.
R:~E O '1~2001\01-0445 Alpine Gardens East 2nd EOl~COA.doc
6
56.
The Developer shall provide a drainage easement and temporary construction easement at
the southwest corner of the property to accommodate four 10'x7' reinforced concrete box
storm drain facility as shown on the City of Temecula Capital Improvement Project No. PW99-
11. (Added by Planning Commission on 7-11-01)
Prior to Issuance of a Building Permit
57.
Improvement plans and/or precise grading plans shall conform to applicable City of Temecula
Standards subject to approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works. The
following design criteria shall be observed:
Flowiine grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over A.C.
paving. Street flowline grades along Loma Linda Road may be reduced to 0.35%
minimum over P.C.C.
Driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula Standard No. 207A.
Streetlights shall be installed along the public streets adjoining the site in accordance
with Ordinance 461.
Concrete sidewalks and ramps shall be constructed along public street frontages in
accordance with City of Temecula Standard Nos. 400 and 401.
Improvement plans shall extend 300 feet beyond the project boundaries.
All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees unless
otherwise approved by the Director of Public Works. The centedine intersection
between Temecula Lane and Loma Linda Road can remain atthe current alignment.
Public Street improvement plans shall include plan and profile showing existing
topography, utilities, proposed centerline, top of curb and flowline grades.
Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and
adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility.
58.
The Developer shall construct the following public improvements to City of Temecula General
Plan standards unless otherwise noted. Plans shall be reviewed and approved bythe Director
of the Department of Public Works:
Improve Pala Road (Modified Arterial Highway Standard - 110' R/W) to include
installation of half-width street improvements allowing for two lanes in each direction
with a center left turn lane, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage
facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer).
Improve Loma Linda Road (Secondary Highway Standard - 88' R/VV) to include
installation of half-width street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk,
streetlights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited
to water and sewer).
Improve Temecula Lane (Local Road Standard - 60' P,/~N) to include installation of
half-width street improvements plus twelve feet, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk,
street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited
to water and sewer)..
Widen the existing bridge at the intersection of Pala Road and Loma Linda Road to
accommodate the project related street improvements.
The Developer shall design and construct or provide a cash deposit for half width
raised landscape median on Pala Road, along property frontage. Plans shall be
reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works.
Install a traffic signal at the intersection of Loma Linda Road and Pala Road to
include signal interconnect with the signal at the intersection of Pala Road and
R:\E O Tk20Ol\014)445 Alpine Gardens East 2nd EO'l~COA.doc
7
Highway 79 South. The Developer is eligible for credit for regional signal facilities
installed by her/him.
All street improvement design shall provide adequate right-of-way and pavement
transitions per Caltrans' standards for transition to existing street sections.
59.
The Developer shall construct the following public improvements in conformance with
applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Director of the Department of Public
Works.
a. Street improvements, which may include, but not limited to: pavement, curb and
gutter, medians, sidewalks, drive approaches, street lights, signing, striping, traffic
signal systems, and other traffic control devices as appropriate
b. Storm drain facilities
e. Sewer and domestic water systems
d. Undergreunding of proposed utility distribution lines
60.
A construction area Traffic Control Plan shall be designed by a registered Civil or Traffic
Engineer and reviewed by the Director of the Department of Public Works for any street
closure and detour or other disruption to traffic circulation as required by the Department of
Public Works.
61. A Signing and Striping Plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by
the Department of Public Works.
62. Bus bays will be designed at all existing and proposed bus stops as directed by Riverside
Transit Agency and approved by the Department of Public Works.
63.
The building pad' shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance with
the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered Civil Engineer, and the Soil Engineer shall
issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions.
64. This development must enter into an agreement with the City for a "Trip Reduction Plan" in
accordance with Ordinance No. 93-01.
65.
The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as required
by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.05 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all
Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06.
66.
In compliance with the Circulation Element of the General Plan, the ultimate Pala Road is
classified as a Urban Arterial Highway Standard - 134' R/W, therefore the developer shall
record a written offer to dedicate additional right of way of 24 feet along property frontage on
Pala Road.
67.
The Developer shall record a written offer to participate in, and waive all rights to object to the
formation of an Assessment District, a Community Facilities District, or a Bridge and Major
Thoroughfare Fee District for the construction of the Ultimate Storm Drain Facility and Pala
Road Widening Improvements in accordance with the General Plan. The form of the offer shall
be subject to the approval of the City Engineer and City Attorney.
Prior* to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy
68. Prior to the first Certificate of Occupancy,
R:~E O qI'~200 l\0 t ~445 Alpine Gardens East 2nd EOT~COA.doc
8
The traffic signal at the intersection of Pala Road and Loma Linda Road shall be
installed and operational
Pala Road improvements shall be complete to include the Pala Road Bridge
(Public Works #97 -15). (Added by the Planning Commission on October 7,
1998.)
Loma Linda Road improvements shall be complete
Temecula Lane improvements shall be complete. -
69. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written
clearance from the following agencies:
· Rancho California Water District
· Eastern Municipal Water District
· Department of Public Works
70. Corner property line cut off shall be required per Riverside County Standard No. 805.
71.
All public improvements, including traffic signals, shall be constructed and completed per the
approved plans and City standards to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of
Public Works.
72.
The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall be
repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of
Public Works.
FIRE DEPARTMENT
The following are the Fire Department Conditions of Approval fo'r this project. All questions
regarding the meaning of these conditions shall be referred to the Fire Prevention Bureau.
73.
Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when the Fire Prevention Bureau reviews
building plans. Identification and implementation of specific conditions regulating the use and
storage of compressed gases, bio-hazardous materials and medicinal waste shall be an
express component of this review. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the
Uniform Building Code (UBC), Uniform Fire Code (UFC), and related codes which are in force
at the time of building plan submittal. (Added by the Planning Commission on October 7,
1998).
74.
The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or
construction of all commercial buildings per UFC Appendix III.A, Table A-III-A-1. The
developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 3250 GPM at 20
PSI residual operating pressure, plus an assumed sprinkler demand of 700 G PM for a total fire
flow of 3950 GPM with a 4 hour duration. The required fire flow may be adjusted during the
approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire protection
measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire Flow as given above has
taken into account all information as provided. (UFC 903.2, Appendix III.A)
75.
The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per UFC
Appendix III.B, Table A-III-B-1. A combination of on-site and off-site super fire hydrants (6" x 4"
x 2-2 Q" outlets) on a looped system shall be located on fire access roads and adjacent to
R:XE O T~2001\0t-0445 Alpine Gardens East 2nd EOT~COA.doc
9
public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 250 feet apart and shall be located no more than
150 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to an
hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system.
The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required. (UFC 903.2,903.4.2, and Appendix III-
B)
76.
As required by the Uniform Fire Code, when any portion of the building(s) is in excess of 150
feet from a water supply on a public street, on site fire hydrants are required. For this project
on site fire hydrants are required. (UFC 903.2)
77. Maximum cul-de-sac length ~hall not exceed 1320 feet. Minimum turning radius on any cul-de-
sac shall be forty-five (45) feet. (UFC 902.2.2.2.3 and Ord. 480)
78. If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection prior
to any building construction. (UFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2)
79.
Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved
temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent roads are installed.
Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface for 70,000 lbs GVW.
(UFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2)
80.
Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved Fire
Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or any portion
of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather
surface designed for 70,000 lbs. GVW with a minimum AC thickness of .25 feet. (UFC sec
902 and Ord 95-15)
81.
Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than
twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13) feet
six (6) inches. (UFC 902.2.2.1 and Ord 95-15)
82.
Prior to building construction, dead end roadways and streets in excess of one hundred and
fifty (150) feet, which have not been completed, shall have a turnaround capable of
accommodating fire apparatus. (UFC 902.2.2.4)
83. Prior to building construction, this development shall have two (2) points of access, via all-
weather surface roads, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. (UFC 902.2.1 )
84.
Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water system
plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall be: signed by
a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature block; and
conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. After the local
water company signs the plans, the originals shall be presented to the Fire Prevention Bureau
for signatures. The required water system including fire hydrants shall be installed and
accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building materials being
placed on an individual lot. (UFC 8704.3,901.2.2.2 and National Fire Protection Association
24 1-4.1)
85. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective Markers" shall
be installed to identify fire hydrant locations. (UFC 901.4.3)
R:~E O 1~2001\01-0445 Alpine Gardens East 2nd EOTxCOA.doc
86.
Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, all commercial buildings shall
display street numbers in a prominent location on the street side of the building. The numerals
shall be minimum twelve (12) inches in height for buildings and six (6) inches for suite
identification on a contrasting background. In strip centers, businesses shall post the suite
address on the rear door(s). (UFC 901.4.4 and Ord 95-15)
87.
Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a directory display monument
sign shall be required for apartment, condominium, townhouse or mobile home parks. Each
complex shall have an illuminated diagrammatic layout of the complex which indicates the
name of the complex, all streets, building identification, unit numbers, and fire hydrant
locations within the complex. Location of the sign and design specifications shall be submitted
to and be approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau prior to installation.
88.
Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on square footage and
type of construction, occupancy or use, the developer shall install a fire sprinkler system. Fire
sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to
installation. (UFC Article 10, UBC Chapter 9 and Ord 95-15)
89.
Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on a requirement for
monitoring the sprinkler system, occupancy or use, the developer shall install an fire alarm
system monitored by an approved Underwriters Laboratory listed central station. Plans shall
be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. (UFC Article 10)
90.
Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a "Knox-Box" shall be
provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six (6) feet in height and be located
to the right side of the main entrance door. The Knox-Box shall be supervised by the alarm
system. (UFC 902.4)
91.
All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates
obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry
system for emergency access by firefighting personnel. (UFC 902.4)
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
92.
The City's park land dedication requirements will apply to for the 141 unit senior apartment
building and the 69 independent care housing units (210 units) is 2.55 acres. Sa!d
roquircmontc will bo caticficd'through tho payment of in lieu focc cquivalcnt to $00,000 per
acre, and purcuant to thc following formula:
23'1 x 210 unite x .005 = 2.'16 acrcc/park roquiromont (Amended by Planning
Commission on 4/24/02)
03.
Tho City ic willing to provide up to a 60% crodit (1.23 acrcc) againct thc park land requirement
for pdvato rccrcational arcac providod on circ. In ordor for tho City to ooncidcr granting caid
croditc, the dovolopcr will nccd to provido tho TCSD with a writton dcccription of tho acrcago
and amcnitice propoc, cd for rccro~tional usc. Land oxcccding a 10% elopo, landscapcd
parkwayc and strcctccapo do not qualify for park credit. Upon rcviow of this information, tho
TCSD will dctorminc thc amount of tho crcdit available to thc dcvelopcr and tho amount of tho
rcmaining in licu feoc. (Deleted by Planning Commission on 4/24/02)
R:\E O Tx2001\014)445 Alpine Gardens East 2nd EOTxCOA,doc
94.
The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler .for disposal of
construction debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul construction debris. (Added by the
Planning Commission on October 7, 1998).
95. Developer shall provide adequate space for a recycling bin within the trash enclosure area(s).
(Added by the Planning Commission on October 7, 1998).
96.
All perimeter landscaping and parkways landccaping and clopo areas shall be "-~'"'*'-~"
maintained by the property owner or private maintenance association. (Amended by
Planning Commission on 4124102)
97.
Class II bike lanes shall be included on any street improvement plans on Pala and Loma Linda
Roads. Any damage caused to the existing Class II bike lanes on Pala and Loma Linda
Roads as a result of construction shall be repaired or replaced, as determined by Public
Works. (Added by the Planning Commission on October 7, 1998).
Prior to Issuance of Buildinq Permits:
98.
Prior to the installation of arterial street lighting, the developer will be required to comply with
the street light dedication process and pay the appropriate fees to the TCSD for the transfer of
said street lighting into the appropriate TCSD maintenance program.
99. Tho TCSD will ooncidor tho dovolopor'c rcquoct to pay tho in liou park fooc prior to iccuanco
of cortificatoc of occupancy. Prior to issuance of building permits for the 141 unit apartment
complex and the 69 housing units, the developer shall satisfy the City's park land dedication
(Quimby) requirement through the payment of in-lieu fees equivalent to 1.23 1.28 acres of park
land, based upon the City's then current land evaluation. Said requirement includes a 50%
credit for private recreational opportunities provided on-site and shall be pro-rated at a per
dwelling unit cost prior to the issuance of each building permit requested. (Added by the
Planning Commission on October 7, 1998) (Amended by Planning Commission on
4~24/O2)
OTHER AGENCIES
100. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Rancho California Water
District's transmittal dated December 24, 1997, a copy of which is attached.
101. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the City of Eastern Municipal
Water District transmittal dated March 2, 1998, a copy of which is attached.
102.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the County of Riverside
Department of Environmental Health's transmittal dated December 30, 1997, a copy of which
is attached.
103. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Riverside County Flood
Control transmittal dated February 2, 1998, a copy of which is attached.
104.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Eastern Information
Center, University of California Riverside transmittal dated January 5, 1998, a copy of which is
attached.
R:\E O '1~,2001\01 0445 Alpine Gardens East 2nd EOT~COA.doc
105. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Department of
Transportation transmittal dated February 2, 1998, a copy of which is attached.
106. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Riverside Transit Agency
(RTA) transmittal dated February 23, 1998, a copy of which is attached.
By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above
Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance
with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be
subject to Planning Commission approval.
Applicant's Signature
Date
Name printed
R:\E O IX2001\014M45 Alpine Gardens East 2nd EOTxCOA.doc
13
Csaba F. Ko
Doug Kulberg
George ,M. Woods
December 24, 1997
MS. Patty Anders, Assistant Planner
City of Temecula
Planning Department
43200 Business Park Drive
Post Office Box 9033
Temecuta, CA 92589-9033
SUBJECT:
WATER AVAILABILITY
TEMECULA SENIOR CARE FACILITY
APN 950-110-007 and APN 950-1'10-008
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0420
Dear Ms. Anders:
Please be advised that the above-referenced proPerty is located within the
boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD). Water Service,
therefore, would be available upon completion of financial arrangements
between RCWD and the property owner.
If fire protection is required, the customer will need to contact RCWD for
fees and requirements.
Water availability would be contingent upon the property owner signing an
Agency Agreement which assigns water management rights, if any, to
RCWD.
If you have any questions, please contact an Engineering Services
Representative at this office.
Sincerely,
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT
~ev~ ~ran,~o~n, P. E.
~velopment Engineering Manager
97/SB:BJ:eb329/FEG
c: Laurie Williams, Engineering Services Supervisor
IUednesday September 2~ 1998 2:1]pm -- Frc~v ,a~ U803~ -- Page 21
SENT flY:E M W O ,~- 2-98 ; 3:03PN ;
"' Eastern/ ,[unicipal raterDi,trict
County o ~Ri~-ilde
Health ~'wices Ageac7
Dei~u I~a nt ot'Fmviranmr~d Health
P.O. Box '7600
Rivenide CalLeornla 92513-7600
RE: T -mecula Independent Care Facility CLsl~ornfs (APN 950-110-4107, 008 or l*arcels 1
au d 2 of PM 8856) Supplemental Requlremen~ to Land Division Sewer Service
The subje ,t project is ~ EMWD's Impr0ven~ District U-8 and Rancho V'dl.ges
Asscssmc tt District No. 159 for sewer service. The following cornmer~ are offered to descn'be
sanitary, wet faciligm ~__~___~ for service.
8~im7 ~,wer
The antid ~ated average daily wastewater flow gem~.d by the subject project will be tt:ated and
disposed I y EMWD'$ T~x~la Valley Water Reclamation FacRity (TVRWRF). At this time the
TVRWI~ 'has ~,mdnnt capacity to provide Ueatment and disposal of the subject projec's
wastewat, r flow.
Rnncho ~/
fz'Om Loll'
~ 8ragty sower pipeline ia Loma Linda Road will bo available t'or connection of the
~ect's onsito gravity sewers. Sewer se~ce will not be granted, ho¥~w., umL thc
~ages ~ District No. I~9, Pala Road gravity sewer pipellne~ constructed
~ I..iada Road to tho intel'section of I-t3,VY 79 Sodth with Pala RoarL
An onsite mblio gravity sc~vct pipeline sludl be constructcd to sente every privately own lot, ns
they m~y ~dst. Ir'the retire site is mnintained trader one ownership, then' on,ire private sewe~
Mn. Ii m: Po~c O~k';c= 'Box 8300 .~ J~.lato~ ~.1;~ 92~S1~500 * T~e (909) 925-7~6 * ~ (9~) 929-02~7
~ Offi~ 104~ ~ S~ J~ ~ ~ J~nto ~ S~ / ~ ~ 440 ~ ~d A~nu~ Hm~. ~
~tiom & M~' ~ce ~z~ ~70 ~e ~d, P~ls, ~ 92~71 · Td~ho~ (~91 928-~ * ~ (909) 928~1~
{uednesda¥ September2, 1999 2:13{xn -- ~ro~ '~ 51803' -- Page 31
SENT §¥:E M W O ~- 2-98 ; 3:03PM ; 9 34 90965484??;# 3
Tho ava'lablo c~ of EMWD'$ sanitary sewer system b contim~ly changing due to the
occurra ~ of'development within the District's se~'vi~e area and p, ugnm~ ofs!mt~m
improv~ nentt A~ =ch, samite to the sut~ect project i~ depead~nt on the timing orthe subject
pro~ect, '.he stnh_,~ ofEMWD's peamit to opea'nt~ and the set,Ace agreement with the ]~trict.
Should I ~ ho any question, please conta~ this o/~ce at (909) 766-1810, exte~on 4467.
Warren..~. Back
Cuatom~.r Service Department
WAB/
} rarkham & Associates
t =temion: N'~ta M~Itw
4'[750 W'mehester Ex)ad, Stc. L
'i anacula, California 92590
TO:
FROM:
RE:
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
DATE: DECEMBER 30, 1997
CITY OF TEMECULA PLANrNING DEPARTMENT
ATTN: Patty Anders
~GREGOR DELLENBACH, Environmental Health specialist IV
PLOT PLAN NO. PA97-0420
1. The Department of Environmental Health hms reviewed the Plot Plan No. PA97-0420 and has no
objections. Sanitary sewer and water services may be available in this area.
2. PRIOR TO ANY PLAN CHECK SUBMITTAL for health clearance, the following items are
required:
a) "Will-serve" letters from the appropriate water and sewering agencies.
b) Three complete sets of plans for each food establishment will be submitted, including a fixture
- schedule, a finish schedule, and a plumbing schedule in order to ensure compliance with the
-California-Uniform Retail Food Facilities Law: For specific reference, please contact Food
Facility Plan eXaininers at (909) 694-5022. ·
c) A clearance letter from the Hazardous Services Materials Management Branch (909) 694-5055
will be required indicating that the project has been cleared for:
· Underground storage tanks, Ordinance #617.4.
· Hazardous Waste Generator Services, Ordinance #615.3.
· Hazardous Waste Disclosure (in accordance with Ordinance #651.2).
· Waste reduction management.
3. Waste Regulation Branch (Waste Collection/LEA).
Page 2
4. PRIOR TO PLAN CHECK SUBMITTAL, THE FOLLOWING ITEMS WILL BE REQUIRED:
d) "Will-serve" letters from the watering and sewering agencies.
e) Three complete sets of plans for the swirrmaing pool/spa will be submitted, 'in order to ensure
compliance with the California Administrative Code, California Health and Safety Code and the
Uniform Building Code.
GD:dr
(909) 275-8980
NOTE: An5' current additional requirements not covered, can be applicable at time of Building
........ Plan review for final Department of Environmental Health clearance.
cc: Doug Thompson
DAVID P. ZAPPE
General Manager-Chief Engineer
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL
AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
City of Temecula
Planning Department
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92590
Attention: ~A TT~/ /'~',/13g f~ 5
Ladies and Gentlemen:
1995 MARKET STREET
RIVERSIDE, CA 92501
909/275-1200
909/788-9965 FAX
7829.1
]'he District does not normally recommend conditions for land divisions or other land use cases in incorporated cities.
The District also does not plan check city land use cases, or provide State Division of Real Estate letters or other flood
hazard reports for such cases. District comments/recommendations for such cases are normally limited to items of
specific interest to the District including District Master Drainage Plan facilities, other regional flood control and
drainage facilities which could be considered a logical component or extension of a master plan system, and Distdct
Area Drainage Plan fees (development mitigation fees). In addition, information of a general nature is provided.
The District has not reviewed the proposed project in detail and the following checked comments do not in any way
constitute or imply District approva/or endorsement of the proposed project w~th respect to flood hazard, public health
and safety or any other such issue:
I,~ This project would not be impacted by Disthct Master Drainage Plan facilities nor are other facilities of regional
interest proposed.
This project involves District Master Plan facilities. The District will accept own6rship of such facilities on
wdtten request of the City. Facilities must be constructed to District standards and District plan check and
inspection will be required for District acceptance. Plan check, inspection and adminis.trative fees will be
required.
This project proposes channels, storm drains 36 inches or larger in diameter or other facilities that could be
considered regional in nature and/or a logical extension of the adopted
Master Drainage Plan. The District would consider accepting ownership of such facilities on wdtten req. uest
of the City; Facilities must be consa'ucted to District standards, and District plan check and inspection wdl be
required for Distdct acceptance. Plan check, inspection and administrative fees will be required.
This project is located within the limits of the District's Area
Drainage Plan for which drainage fees have been adopted; applicable fees should be paid by cashier's check
or money order only to the Flood Control District or City prior to issuance of building or grading permits,
whichever comes first. Fees to be paid should be at the rate in effect at the time of issuance of the actual
permit.
GENERAL INFORMATION
This project may require a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water
Resources Control Board. Clearance for grading, recordation, or other final approval should not be given until the City
has determined that the project has been granted a permit or is shown to be exempt.
If this project involves a Federal Emergen .c,j Management Agency (FEMA) mapped flood plain, then the City should
require the applicant to provide all studies, calculations, plans and other information required to meet FEMA
requirements and should further require that the applicant obtain a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) prior
to grading, recordation or other final approva of the proje~ and a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) prior to occupancy.
If a natural watercourse or mapped flood plain is impacted by this project, the City should require the applicant to
obtain a Section 1601/1603 Agreement from the California Department of Fish and Game and a Clean Water Act
Section 404 Permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, or wdtten correspondence from these agencies indicating
the project is exempt from these requirements. A Clean Water Act Section 401 Water Quality Certification may be
required from the local Califomia Regional Water Quality Control Board pdor to issuance of the Corps 404 permit.
Very truly yours,
STUART E. MCKIBBIN
Senior Civil Engineer
CALIFORNIA
HISTORICAL
RESOURCES
INFORMATION
. YSTEM
~[ONO
[NYO
RIVERSIDE
Eastern Information Center
Department of Anthropology
University of California
Riverside, CA 92521-0418
Phone (909) 787-5745
Fax (909) 787-5409
CULTURAl, RESOURCE REVIEW
DATE: ."~Ct~to~.v-¥ ~,lqqg~
RE: Case Transmittal Reference Designation: '-0~q3- -oq2o
Records at the Eastern Information Center of the California Historical Resources Information System have
been reviewed to determine if this project would adversely affect prehistoric or historic cuimral resources:
The proposed project ama has not been surveyed for cultural resouroes and contains or is adjacent to Imown cultural
resource(s). A Phase [ study is recommended.
Based upon existing da~a the proposed project area has the potential for containing cultural resources. A Phase I study
is recommended.
A Phase I cultural resource study (MF #
) identified one or more cultural.resources.
Thc project area contains, or has the pOssibility of containing, cultural resources. However, duc to the nature of thc
project or prior data recovery studies, an adverse effect on cultural resources is not anticipated. Further study is not
recommended.
A Phase [ cultural resource study (MF #
) identified no cultural resources. Further study is not recommended.
There is a low probability of cultural resources. Further study is not recommended.
If, during construction, cultural resources are encountered, work should b¢ halted or diverted in the immediate area while
a qualified archaeologist evaluates the finds and makes recoraraendations.
Due to tho archaeological sensitivity of the area, esrthmoving during construetlon should be monitored by a professional
archaeologist.
Resource Management Reports prepared by the California Office of Historic Preservation, Preservation Planning Bulletin
4(a), December 1989.
Phase I
Phase Ii
Phase Iil
Phase IV
Records search and field survey
Testing [Evaluate resource significance; propose mitigation measures for "significant" sites.]
Mitigation [Data recovery by excavation, preservation in place, or a combination of the two.l
Monitor earthmoving activities
COMMENTS:
If you have any questions, please contact us.
Eastern Information Center
[~IC~FRMS~T P,~NSMIT
STATE OF CALIFORNIA- BUSINESS, TRANSJ //UN AND HOUSING AGENCY
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DISTRICT 8, 464 W. 4~h STREET, GUt FLOOR
SAN BERNARDiNO, CA 92401.1400
PETE W~LSON. Governor
February 2, 1998
08-Riv-79-19.07
Ms. Patty A nders
Assistant Planner
City of Temecula
Planning Department
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula,. CA 92589-9033
Dear Ms. Anders:
PA97-0420
We have reviewed the above-referenced documents and request
consideration of-the following comment:
Caltrans supports economic growth and orderly land use
development; however, new development must pay its fair
share for upgrading infrastructure facilities needed to
serve the development. This infrastructure includes State
highways and freeways. It also includes both direct and
cumulative traffic impacts. All jurisdictions should take
measures available to fund improvements and reduce total
trips generated. In view of the fact there are limited
funds available for infrastructure improvements, we
recommend the City of Temecula take the lead in developing
a fair-share mechanism in which each project can fund
improvements for the decrease in Level of Service (LOS) for
which it is responsible.
If you have any questions, please contact Hark Grant at
(909) 383-4655 or FAX (909) 383-7934.
Sincerely,
CECIL KARSTENSEN, Acting Chief
Office of Riverside County
Transportation Planning
February 23, 1998
Riverside Transit Agency(
1825 Third Street
P.O. Box 59968
Riverside, CA 92517
Phone: (909) 684-0850
Fax: (909) 684-1007
Ms. Patty Anders
City of Temecula
Temecula Planning Department
43200 Business Park Drive
Tcmecula, CA 92590
RE: PA97-0420
Dear Vivian:
We do not currently provide service to the site mentioned above but based on the size of the project
and our own plans for future growth, we are requesting that a bus turnout or a pad for a bus stop
be incorporated into the general design. 'lo eusure accessibility to the available transit services
for residents and visitors of this developmem, RTA wouid like to suggest that the following transit
amenities should be provided by the owner/applicant to mitigate transportation impacts.
Transit stop located at: Lama Linda Rd nearside Pala Rd. adjacent to Medical Bldg. A
A bus turnout, should be provided at the above stop location, if determined by City Traffic
Engineer to be necessary based on roadway cross section, travel volumes and speeds. I can provide
an exact location for the turnout/bus stop as the project progresses.
We appreciate the opportunity to review this project. Please contact me or Fiaa Clemente at
(909)684-0850 shouM you require' additional information or specifications.
Stephen C. Otler
Deputy General Manager
SO/jsc
PDEV#162
A'I-FACHMENT NO. 2
INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY
PA97-0420
Dated September 10, 1998
R:~E O T~2.001~01-0445 A~pine Gardens East 2nd EOT~Staff Report.doc
9
CITY OF TEMECULA
Environmental Checklist
Project Title:
Lead Agency Name and Address:
Contact Person and Phone Number:
Project Location:
Project Sponsor's Name and Address:
6. General Plan Designation:
7. Zoning:
8. Description of Project:
SurroUnding Land Uses and Setting:
10.
Other public agencies whose
approval is required:
Planning Application No. PA97-0420 (Development Plan)
City of Temecula
43200 Business Park Drive
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 9258%9033
Patty Anders, Assistant Planner
(909) 694-6400
The northwest comer of Loma Linda and Pala
Roads.
Brain Sesko
B & B Properties
424 Stratford Court, B-10
Del Mar, CA 92014
PO (Professional Office )
PO (Professional Office )
The project consists of the design, construction and
operation of a senior care facility consisting of a 121 umt
assisted care facility building, a 141 unit senior apartment
building, two medical office buildings totaling 27,700 sq.
ft., an Alzheimer's facility of 7,200 sq. f/~, 69 independent
care housing units with a detached clubhouse and pool, with
associated parking and landscaping on a 22.62 acre site.
The project is proposed on two legal parcels that will be
merged to accommodate the proposed development. There
are a few dilapidated buildings on the subject parcels. The
area to the north is an existing residential development, to
the south is vacant land, to the east is a community park and
some existing large lot, ranch houses. To the west, across
Pala Road is an existing residential development.
Riverside County Fire Department, Health Department;
Temecula Police Department; Eastern Municipal Water
District, Rancho California Water District, Southern
California Gas Company, Southern California Edison
Company, General Telephone Company and Riverside
Transit Agency.
PcXP LANNING'x4 2 0pa9 7 ENV..doc
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AI~'FECTED:
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at
least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following
pages.
[ ] Land Use and Planning
[ ] Population an~l Housing
IX] Geologic Problems
[X] Water
[ ] Air Quality
[X] Transportation/Circulation
[ ] Biological Resources
[ ] Energy and Mineral Resources
DETERMINATION
IX ] Hazards
[ ] Noise
[X] Public Services
[X] Utilities and Service Systems
[ ] Aesthetics
[ ] Cultural Resources
[ ] Recreation
[ ] Mandatory Findings of Significance
On the basis of this initial evaluation, I fred that although the proposed project could have a significant
effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation
· measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE
DECLARATION will be prepared.
Signature
Printed Name:
Date:
Patty Anders, Assistant Planner
September 10, 1998
For: City of Temecula
R:kPLANNING~420pa97ENV..doc
1. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal:
Potentially
Significant
Potentially Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
a. Conflict with general plan designation or zoning?
(Source I, Figure 2-1, Page 2~17)
[ ] [ ] [ ] ix]
b. Conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies
adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project?
[ ] [ ] [ ] ix]
c. Be incompatible with existing land use in the vicinity?
(Source 4, p. 17.02-3)
[ ] ix] [ ]
d. Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g. impacts to
soils or farmlands, or impacts from incompatible land uses)?
(Source 1, Figure 54, Page 5,16).
[ ] [ ] [ ] ix]
e. Disrupt or divide the physical an'angement of an establisbed
community (including low-income or minority community)? [ ]
[ ] [ ] ix]
DISCUSSION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
la,b The project is consistent with the City's General Plan and has a Land Use Designation of PO (Professional Office).
The proposed project is a senior facility which includes a 121 unit assisted care facility building, a 141 unit
senior apartment building, two medical office buildings totaling 27,700 sq. ft., an Alzheime~ facility of 7,200
sq. ft., 69 independent care housing units with a detached clubhonse and pool, with associated parking and
landscaping on a 22.62 acre site. The proposed project is apermitted use under the PO zoning classification.
The overall impacts from all General Plan Land Use Designations were analyzed in the Environmental Impact
Report for (EIR) the General Plan. Agencies with jurisdiction within the City commented on the scope of the
analysis contained in the EIR and how the land uses would impact their particular agency. Mitigation measures
approved with the E/lO, will be applied to this project. Further, all agencies with jurisdiction over the project are
' aI~0 being given the oppommity to comment on the project and it is anticipated that they w/Il make the appropriate
comments as to how the project relates to their specific environmental plans or polices. There will be limited, if
any environmental effects on environmental plans or polices adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the
project. No significant effects are anticipated as a result of this project.
The proposed senior facility will not be incompatible with existing land uses, and will not be considered
incompatible or maPact the existing single family developments, neighborhood parks or the limited neighborhood
retail and commercial uses in the vicinity. The project has been designed so that the one-story condominium units
are located at the western portion of the site, adjacent to the existing, detached, single family residential
development The three story apartment and assisted care buildings are located near the center and eastern portion
of the site, away from the adjacent residential development. The medical buildings are clustered around the
southeast comer of Pala and Loma Linda Roads, also away from the adjacent residential tract to the west of the
subject property. The single story condominiums will serve as a good transitional product bev,veen the existing
tract development to the west and the proposed three story apartment and assisted care stmctures. The project ha~
been designed to comply with the City-Wide Design Guidelines, the Development Code and General Plan. The
architectural style was designed to be residential in nature and to be compatible with the surrounding residential
developments. With the proposed.site layout, architectural style and interfacing, no significant effects are
anticipated as a result of this project.
R:~LANNING\420pa97ENV..doc
I d,e The project will not affect agricultural resources or disrupt or divide the physical airangement of an established
community (including low-income or minority community). The project is proposed on two parcels with an
existing residential use and some accessory structures on site. However, there are no established residential
communities (including low-income or minority communities) being dismpted or divided.
2. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal:
2.a
2.b
2.C
16otenflally
Significant
Potentially Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
a. Cumulatively exceed official regional or local population
projects?
[] [1 [1 [~
b. Induce substantial growth in an area either directiy or
indirectly (e.g. through project in an undeveloped area
or extension of major hffrasU'ucture)?
[] [] [] ~]
c. Displace existing housing, especially affordable housing? [ ]
[ ] [ ] ix]
DISCUSSION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
The project will not cumulatively exceed official regional or local population projections. The proposed project
is designed to accommodate senior citizens within Temecula and the surrounding areas. Although the project may
provide housing for seniors currently living outside of Temecula, it is anticipated that the project will not be a
significant contributor to population growth .which will cumulatively exceed official regional or local population
projections due to the limited number of units being approved with this development application. The project
is consistent with the City's General Plan Land Use and Zoning Designation of PO (Professional Office) and is
not exceeding lot coverage or floor area ratio requirements; therefore, no significant effects are anticipated as a
result of this project.
The project will not induce substantial growth in the area either directly or indirectly. The project is consistent
with the General Plan Land Use and Zoning Designation of PO (Professional Office) and will primarily serve the
housing and medical needs for people in the immediate and surrounding areas. The project may cause some
people to relocate to or within Temecula; however, due to its limited, scale, it will not induce substantial growth
in the area. No significant effects are anticipated as a result of this project.
The project will not displace housing, especially affordable housing as the site does not have existing housing.
No significant effects are anticipated as a result of this project.
GEoLoGIc PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result
in or expose people to potential impacts involving?
Potentially
Significant
Potentially Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
a. Fault rapture? (Source 1, Figure 7-1, Page 7-5)
[] [] [] ix]
b. Seismic ground shaking?
c. Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction?
[ ] IX] [ ] IX]
[ ] IX] [] [ ]
R:XP LANN llq GXA20p a97 ENV..doc
d. Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard? [ ] [ ] [ ] IX]
e. Landslides or mudflows?
[] [] [] ~]
f. Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil conditions
form excavation, grading or fill?
[] [] [×] []
g. Subsidence of the land? (Source 1, Figure 7-2, Page 7-8) [ ] [X] [ ] [ ]
h. Expansive soils? [ ] [ ] [X] [ ]
i. Unique geologic or physical features? [ ] [ ] [ ] [X]
DISCUSSION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
3 .a,b
The project is located in Southem California, in an area which is seismically active. The proposed development
may have a significant impact on people involving fault rapture, and seismic ground shaking as the site lies within
Ground Shaking Zone II which is expected to vary fi.om moderate to intense in the event of an earthquake,
· depending on the composition o£underlying geologic formations, the earthquake's epicenter and the order of
magnitude of the seismic event. A Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation noted that Uniform Building Code
COBC) Seismic Zone 4 standards would apply to construction at this site. Prelim/nary soils reports are required
and reviewed as part of the application submittal, and recommendations contained in these reports are used to
determine appropriate conditions of approval for the project. The soils reports will also contain recommendations
for the compaction of the soil winch will serve to mitigate any potentially significant impacts from seismic ground
shaking or erosion.
3.c,dThe project will not expose people to ground failure; including liquefaction; a seiche, tsunami or volcanic hazard;
subsidence or expansive soils. The area is located in an area that the General Plan identified as having the
potential for liquefactiom However, a Geotechnical Investigation Report that was submitted for the project
indicated that the site has a very low potential for liquefaction and expansive soils. In addition, no unique geologic
or physical features or upstream water impoundments have been identified that could impact the site. As a result,
no significant effects are anticipated as a result of this project.
3.e
The project will not expose people to landslides or mudflows. The Final Envkonmental Impact for the City of
Temecula General Plan has not identified any known landslides or mudslides located on the site or proximate to
the site. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of tins project.
3.f,h
The proposed development may have an impact on people involving changes in topography or unstable soil
conditions from expansive soils, excavation, grading or fill. Any potentially significant impacts will be mitigated
through building construction which is consistent with Uniform Building Code standards. In addition, a
Gentechnical report was submitted and reviewed for the above conditions. Recommendations contained in this
report will be used to determine appropriate constxuction practices and recommendations for the compaction of
the soil which will serve to mitigate any potentially significant impacts from erosion, changes in topography or
unstable soil conditions 15om grading, expansive soils, excavation, grading or fill prior to the issuance of penmts.
Modification to topography and ground surface relief features will not be considered significant since
modifications will be consistent with UBC and the approved Geotechnical report which analyzed soil conditions
and qualilies.
3.i
The project will not impact unique geologic or physical features. The site lacks any notable existing sloped areas.
No unique geologic features or physical features exist on the site. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result
of this project.
R:~LANNING\420pa97ENV..doc
4. WATER. Would the pi'oposal result in:
Potentially
Significant
Potentially Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Impact Incoi~orated Impact Impact
a. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the
rate and mount of surface molT?.
[] [] IX] []
b. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards
such as flooding?
[ ] IX] [ ] [ ]
Discharge into surface waters or other alteration of surface
water quality (e.g. temperature, dissolved oxygen or
turbidity)?
[] [] IX] []
d. Changes in the amount of surface water in any water
body?
[1 [1 [] P<]
e. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water
movements?
[] [] [~ []
Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through
direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception
of an aquifer by cuts or excavations or through substantial
loss of groundwater recharge capability?
[1 [] [] [~
g. Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater?
[] [l Il [Xl
h. lmpacts to groundwater quality? [ ] [ ] [ ] [X]
i. Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater
otherwise available for public water supplies?
[] [] [] IX]
DISCUSSION OF TIlE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
4.a
The subject site has limited structures on site (one single family residential and dilapidated accessory structures).
Some changes to absorption rates, drainage patterns and the rate and amount of suffaea runoff is expected
whenever development occurs on previously permeable ground. Previously permeable ground will be rendered
impervious by constmetiun of buildings, accompanying hardscape and driveways. While absorption rates and
surface nmoff will change, potential impacts shall be mitigated through site design and improvements. Drainage
conveyances will be requked for the project to safely and adequately handle runoff which is created. In addition,
the project will be conditioned to participate in an assessment district or other funding mechanism to improve the
drainage system in the mediate area. Atter mitigation measures are performed, no significant impacts are
anticipated as a result of this project.
4.b The project could have a significant impact to people or property to water rehted hazards such as flooding since
a portion of the project site is encompassed by two FEMA 100 year flood plains as shown on the FEMA Flood
Insurance Rate Map, Community Panel Number 060742 0010 B, dated November 20, 1996. The Temecula Creek
flood plain crosses the area about 600 feet north of the site. The Flood Insurance Rate Map provides approxLmate
flood plain limits and 100-year flood plain elevations to which buildings must be elevated. The flood plain
approaches Temecula Lane and crosses the property in an,east to west direction. The North Side of Wolf Valley
flood plain is shallow with approximate depths of up to one foot. The North Side of Wolf Valley flood plain
crosses approximately the southerly 600 feet of the site. This flood plain has an expected 100-year flow of 3,129
CTS at the intersection of Pala Road and Loma Linda Road. The existing grouted rip-rap trapezoidal channel along
the north side of Pala Road has a limited capacity. The remaining flows spread out as a shallow flood plain across
the fight of way of Pala Road. These overland flows approach Loma Linda Road as a relatively shallow and wide
flood plain (about 750 feet across). To address these potentially significant impacts, it is anticipated that a
combination of barrier protection along the site perimeter and elevation of onsite sn'uctures will be utilized to
protect the proposed development from offsite flows. In addition, it is also expected that coordination of the
design with the adjacent landowuers and some participation in a joint funding mechanism will be needed to
construct the ultimate drainage facilities.
To mitigate these potentially significant impacts to a level of knsignificance, the project will be conditioned to
provide a detailed hydrology study and grading plans, and receive City approval of the storm drain improvement
plans to ensure that the on-site structures will be floodproofed and that tributary storm flows around the site will
be conveyed to an acceptable outlet in accordance with the approved hydrology study, prior to the issuance of a
grading permit. The project will not be permitted to increase flows or divert flows to impact any adjacent
properties. It may also be necessary to install storm drain facilities or other improvements along Temecula Lane
and through the site to protect the project and convey storm flows to an adequate outlet. Finally, the project will
conditioned for the developer to record a written offer to participate/n, and waive all fights to object to the
formation of an Assessment District for the construction of the ultimate storm drain facilities. With the conditions
of approval and mitigation measures, no significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
4.C
The project may have a potentially significant effect on discharges into surface waters and alteration of surface
water quality. Prior to issuance of a grading permit for the project, the developer will be required to comply with
the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water
Resources Control Board. No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent has been filed or the
project is shown to be exempt. By complying with the NPDES requirements, any potential impacts can be
mitigated to a level less than significant. After mitigation measures are performed, no sig~/ficant impacts are
anticipated as a result of this project.
4.d,e The project will have a less than significant impact in a change in the amount of surface water in any water body
or impact currents, or to the course or direction of water movements. Additional surface nmoffwill occur because
· previously permeable ground will be rendered impervious by conslmction of buildings, accompanying hardscape
and driveways. Due to the limited scale of the project, the additional amount of drainage into the City's drainage
system will not be considered significant. Less than significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
4.f~h The project will have a less than significant change in the quantity and quality of ground waters, either through
direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations or through substantial
loss of groundwater recharge capability. Limited changes vail occur in the quantity and quality of ground waters.
However, due to the minor scale of the project, it will not be considered significant. Further, coastmction on the
site will not be at depths sufficient to have a significant impact on ground waters. Less than significant impacts
are anticipated as a result of this project.
4.i
The project will not ~sult in a substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater otherwise available for public
water supplies. According to information contained in the Final Environmental Impact Report for the City of
Temecula General Plan, "Rancho California Water District indicate that they can accommodate additional water
demands." Water service currently exists in the immediate proximity to the project. Water service will be
provided by Rancho California Water District (RCWD). This is typically provided upon completion of financial
arrangements between RCWD and the property owner. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this
project.
R:kP LANNING~ 20pa97 ENV..doc
5. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal:
Potentially
Significant
Po~ntially Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
a. Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an
existing or projected air quality violation? [ ]
b. Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? [ ]
c. Alter air movement, moisture or temperature, or cause
any change ia climate? [ ]
d. Create objectionable odors? [ ]
[ ] [ ] [x]
[] [] [x]
[ ] [ ] [x]
[] [] [x]
DISCUSSION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
5.a
The project is not expected to violate any air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air
quality violation. The project is below the threshold (612 units) for potentially significant air quality impact
established by South Coast Air Quality Management District for retirement community projects (Page 6-11,
Table 6-2 of the South Coast Air Quality Management CEQA Air Quality Handbook). No significant impacts
· are anticipated as a result of this project.
5.b
The project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants. There are no significant pollutants nor sensitive
-receptors in proximity to the project. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
5.C
The project will not alter air movement, moisture or temperature, or cause any change in climate. The single-
story, limited scale of the project precludes it from creating any significant impacts on the envkonment in
area. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
5.d
The project may create objectionable odors during the construction phase of the project, or, if the biohaza~dous
material is not properly stored or removed from the site in accordance with the Medical Waste Management
Act pursuant to the Health and Safety Code. However, this project will be conditioned to obtain all necessary
permits and clearances from the Riverside County Deparmaent of Environmental Health which enforces the
state regulations in the handling, storage, removal, etc. of biohazardous materials. The consmxction impacts
will be of short duration, and the biohazardous materials will be regulated by the Department of
Environmental Health; therefore, no other odors are anticipated as a result of this project.
6. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION.
Would the proposal result in:
Potentially
Significant
Po~nfially Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Impact lnco~orated Impact Impact
a. Increase vehicle trips or traffic congestion?
[1 [x] [1 [ ]
b. Hazards to safety from design features (e.g. sharp curves
or dangerous intersection or incompatible uses)?
[ ] [ ] [x] [1
[] [1 [1
d. Insufficient parking capacity on-sito or off-site? [ ] [ ] [ ] [X]
e. Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists?
f. Comlicts with adopted policies support'lng alternative
transportation (e.g. bus turnouts, bicycle racks)?
[] [] [1 ~]
g. Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts?
[1 [] [3 [x]
DISCUSSION OF THE ENVHIONMENTAL IMPACTS
6.a The site/s located in an area that currently has level of service (LOS) "F" at the intersections of Pala Road and
Loma Linda during peak traffic hours. The traffic report submitted for this project states that the proposed
development will generate approximately 2,214 trips per weekday with 128 vehicles per hour dining the AM peak
hours and 205 vehidles per hour during PM peak hours, or 4.4% to 11%. The recent traffic counts for this
intersection do warrant imtallation of a traffic signal-even ffthis project is not built. The signal has been included
in the 1998/99 Capital Improvement Prograrm The City has agreed to allow the developer to install the signal with
the construction of this project, and to reimburse the developer for the cost of the signal. In addition to the
installation of the traffic signal, the project will be conditioned for the following road improvements: to construct
the portion of Pala Road adjacent to the subject site to create four through lanes and a left turn lane; to consh'uct
the portion of Loma Linda Road adjacent to the subject site to its ultimate half-section width as a Secondary
Highway (88 foot right-of-way); to coustruct the portion of Temecula Lane adjacent to the subject site to its
ultimate half-section width as a residential street (60 foot right-of-way); to provide a two-way left mm median on
Loma Linda Road for eastbound vehicles desiring to tuna left into the project site; to participate 9n a pro-rata basis
of funding city-wide Ixaffic improvements based upon adopted City fees; and to aglee not to oppose an assessment
district or other funding mechanism to improve the Pala Road corridor street system to solve the ultimate traffic
problem. The project will also be conditioned that Certificate of Occupancy will not be granted until all
conditioned road improvements arc completed.
In addition to the above mitigation measures, additional off-site road improvements in the surrounding area will
also help to accommodate the existing traffic as well as the incromental increase caused by the proposed project.
The existing two-lane Pala Road Bridge will be widened to at least four lanes. The.bridge improvements are
anticipated to be completed in December 1999. Highway 79 South interchange is currently being enhanced and
construction is scheduled to be completed in March 1999. The future expansion of Highway 79 South between
Interstate 15 and Pala Road is currently being designed and funding is being acquired to complete this exl>ansion.
This project is scheduled to go to bid in March 1999 and completion of tiffs project is scheduled for the spring
of 2000. After mitigation measures are performed, road improvements completed, and public facilities fees paid,
the traffic impacts associate with this project are anticipated to be mitigated to a level of insignificance.
6.b. The project will not result in hazards to safety from design features. The project is designed to current City
standards and does not propose any hazards. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
6.c. The project will not result in inadequate emergency access or inadequate access to nearby uses. The project is
designed to cmxent City standards and has adequate emergency access. The project does not interfere with access
to nearby uses. No significant impacts are anticipated as a restdt of this project.
6.d. Thc project provides sufficient parking on-site. Thc project is providing parking that exceeds thc required number
of parking spaces for each usc type. Overall, thc on-site parking exceeds the Development Code parking
requirements. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
6.c. The project will not result in hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists. The project is designed to current
City standards requiring sidewalks and bicycle lanes pursuant to General Plan Road standards. No significant
impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
6.fi The project will not conflict with adopted policies supporting alternative transportation. The project will be
conditioned to provide a bus turnout for a bus stop as requested by Riverside Transit Agency letter dated February
R:~PLANN [NG\420pa97ENV..doc
23, 1998. Therefore, the project will be supporting alternative methods of transportation. No significant impacts
are anticipated as a result of this project.
6.g. The project will not result in raft, waterborne or air traffic impacts. Rail, waterborne or air txaffic do not exist in
the mediate proximity of the project site. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal
result in impacts to:
potentially
Significant
Potentially Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant 1'4o
Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
a. Endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats
(including but not limited to plants, fish, insects, and animals
and birds)?
[1 [1 [] [~
:.,b. Locally designated species (e.g, heritage trees)?
[1 [1 [1
c. Locally designated natural communities (e.g. oak forest,
coastal habitat, etc.)?
[1 [1 [] IX]
d. Wetland habitat (e.g. marsh, riparian and vernal pool)?
e. Wildlife dispersal Or migration Corridors?
[1 [1 [1 Ix]
[] [1 [] [x]
7a.
The project will not result in an impact to endangered, threatened or rare species or thei~ habitats, including, but
not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals and birds. Currently, there are no native species of plants, no unique,
rare, threatened or endangered species of plants, no native vegetation on or adjacent to the site and there are no
indications that any sensitive species exist at this location. The project will not reduce the number of species,
provide a barrier to the migration of animals or deteriorate existing habitat since it is not in a location to connect
existing habitat areas. The project site is located within the Stephen's Kangaroo Rat Habitat Fee Area and Habitat
Conservation fees will be required to mitigate the effect of cumulative impacts of urbanization on the species. No
significant impacts are anticipated as a reanlt of this project.
7.b
The project will not result in an impact to locally designated species. Locally designated species are protected in
the Old Town Temecula Specific Plan; however, they are not protected elsewhere in the City. Since this project
is not located in Old Town, and since there are no locally designated species on site, no significant impacts are
anticipated as a result of this project.
'7.c The project will not result in an impact to locally designated natural communities. Reference response 7.b. No
significant impacts axe a~ticipated as a result of this project.
7.d The project will not result in an impact to wetland habitat. There is no wetland habitat on-site or adjacent to the
site. Therefore, no significant impacts are.anticipated as a result of this project.
7.e The project will not result in an impact to wildlife dispersal or migration corridors. The project site does not serve
as part of a migration corridor. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
R:~P LANN flqGXA20pa97 ENV..doc
8. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES.
Would the proposal:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless Less Than
Mitigation Significant No
Incorporated Impact Impact
a. Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans?
b. Use non-renewal resources in a wasteful and inefficient
[ ] [ ] ix] [ ]
c. Result in the loss of availability of a known mlneral resonrce
that would be of future value to the region and the residents
of the State?
DISCUSSION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
8.a
The project will not impact and/or conflict with adopted energy conservation plans. The project will be reviewed
for compliance with all applicable laws pertaining to energy conservation during the plan check stage. No permits
will be issued unless the project is found to be consistent with these applicable laws. N° significant impacts are
anticipated as a result of this project.
8.b The project will result in a less than significant impact for the use of non-renewable resources in a wasteful and
inefficient manner. While there will be an increase in thc rate of use of any natural resource and in the depletion
of nonrenewable resource(s) (construction materials, fuels for the daffy operation, asphalt, lumber) and the
subsequent depletion of these non-renewable natural resources due to the small scale of the proposed
development, these impacts are not seen as significant.
8.c The project will not result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to
the region and the residents of the State. No known mineral resource that would be of future value to the region
and the residents of the State is located at this project site. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result oft/tis
project.
9. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve:
Potentially
Significant
Potentially Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Impact lnco~orated Impact Impact
A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous
substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides,
chemical or radiation)?
[] [~ [] [1
b. Possible interference with an emergency response plan
or emergency evacuation plan?
[1 [] [1 IX]
c. The creation of any health hazard or potential health
hazard?
Il [] [1 IX]
d. Exposnre of people to existing sources of potential health
hazards.9
[ ] [ ] [ I Ix]
R:~PLANNING\420pa97ENV..doc
e. Increase fire hazard in areas with flammable brush,
grass, or txees? [ ] [ ] [ ] [X]
DISCUSSION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
9.a
Thc two medical office buildings and assisted care facilities will generate small amounts of biohazardous materials.
However, the handling, storage, and removal of such materials is regulated by the Riverside County Department
of Environmental Health which ensures compliance with the Medical Waste Management Act of the Health and
Safety Code. The Depamnent of Environmental Health stated the applicant will be required to obtain a clear,race
letter from the tta?ardous Services Materials Management Branch for the following: Hazardous Waste Generator
Services, Ordinances ff615.3, Hazardous Waste Disclosure (in accordance with Ordinance 651.2) and Waste
Reduction Management. The project will be conditioned to obtain all necessary perm/ts and/or clearances from
all pertinent local and state mgulairng agencies. Therefore, a less than significant/mpact is anticipated as a result
of this project.
9.b
The project will not interfere with an emergency response plan or an emergency evaluation plan. The subject site
is not located in an area which could impact an emergency response plan. The project will lake access fi.om a
maintained street and will therefore not impede any emergency response or emergency evacuation plans. No
significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
9.c,d,e The project will not result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard, nor expose people to
existing sources of potential health hazards, nor increase lure hazard in areas with flammable brash, grass or trees.
The project will be reviewed for compliance with all applicable health laws during the plan check and occupancy
stages of development. No permits will be issued unless the project is found to be consistent with these laws. No
health hazards are known to be in proximity to the project site. The project site is not located within or proximate
to a fire hazard area. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
10. NOISE. Would the proposal result in:
Potentially
Significant
Potentially Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
a. Increase in existing noise levels? [ ] [ ] [X] [ ]
b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels?
[] [] [~ [1
DISCUSSION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
10.a The proposal will result in a less than significant increase to existing noise levels. The site is curt~mly vacant and
development of the land logically will result in increases to noise levels during construction phases as well as
increases to noise in the area over the long ran. This type of senior facility may result in more fi.equent exposure
to sirens; however, the overall increase in siren noise is exlremely incremental and therefore considered to be a
less than significant impact to the surrounding neighborhoods.
10.b. The project will result in some short term severe noise levels. The project may expose people to severe noise
levels during the construction phase of development. ConsU-ucfion machinery is capable of producing noise in
the range of 100+ dBA at 100 feet which is considered very annoying and can cause hearing damage from steady
eight-hour exposure. However, the source of such noise at the project site will be of short duration, and not
considered significant. There w/Il be no long-term exposure of people to severe noise (reference 10.a above). No
significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
R:\P LAIqN INGM20pa97 EI'I~..doc
11.
PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect
upon, or result in a need for new or altered government
services in any of the following areas:
Potentially
Significant
Potentially Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
a. Fire protection? [ ] [ ] [X] [ ]
b. Police protection? [ ] [ ] [X] [ ]
c. Schools? [ ] [ ] [ ] [X]
d. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads?
[] [-] [~ []
e. Other governmental services? [ ] [ ] [ ] [X]
DISCUSSION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
1 l.a,b The project will have a less than significant impact upon, or result in a need for new or altered fire or police
protection. The project will incrementally increase the need for fire and police protection; however, the project
is required to pay development impact fees which are utilized to help pay for these services. No additional
personnel or equipment will be required as a result of this project. The project will pay its fair share to provide
these services through the required development impact fees; therefore, less than significant impacts are
anticipated as a result of this project.
11. c. The project will not have a significant impacts on school facilities; however, in acco[dance with State Laws,
the developer will conMbute his&er fair share of development impact fees earmarked for the school district.
After nfitigation is performed and development impact fees paid, no significant impacts are anticipated as a
result of this project.
ll.d.
The project will have a less than significant impact upon maintenance of public facilities, including roads.
Funding for the maintenance of roads is derived from the State of California gasoline tax, which is distributed
to the City of Tcmecula. Impacts to current and future needs for maintenance of roads as a result of the project
will be incremental, and not considered significant. The gasoline tax is sufficient to provide for maintenance
expenses. In addition, the applicant shall pay applicable public facilities fees. No significant impact is
anticipated as a result of this project.
1 l.e,
The project will not have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services. The
project is consistent with the General Plan designation for the area. The effect upon governmental services is
expected as part of the build-out of the area. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
12.
UTILI'rlES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the
proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies,
or substantial alterations to the following utilities:
Potentially
Significant
Potentially Unless Less T~an
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
a. Power or natural gas?
[] [] [1 [x]
R:~PLANNlNG\420pa97 ENV..doc
b. Communications systems? [ ] [ ] [ ] [X]
c. Local or regional water treatment or distribution
cities?
[ ] [ ] [ ] IX]
d. Sewer or septic tanks? [ ] [ ] [ ] [X]
e. Storm water drainage? [ ] [X] [ ] [ ]
f. Solid waste disposal? [ ] [ ] [ ] [X]
g. Local or regional water supplies? [ ] [ ] [ ] [X]
DISCUSSION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
12.a The project will not result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations to power or natural gas.
These systems are currently being delivered in proximity to the site. No significant impacts are anticipated as a
result of this project.
12.b The project will not result in a need for new systems or supphes, or substantial alterations to communication
systems (reference response No. 12.a.). No significant impacts are anticipated as a result oft/tis project.
12.c
The project will not result in the need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations to local or regional
water treatment or distribution facilities. The existing facilities in place can accommodate the additional
incremental increase due to this project; therefore, no si~ificant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
12.d
The project will not result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations to sanitary sewer
systems or septic tanks. While the project will have an incremental impact upon existing systems, the Final
Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) for the City's General Plan states: 'q>oth EMWD and RCWD have indicated
an ability to supply as much water as is required in their services areas (p. 39)." The FEIR further states:
"implementation of the proposed General Plan xvould not significantly impact wastewater services (p. 40)." Since
the project is consistent with the City's General Plan, no ~ignificant impacts are anticipated as a result of this
project. There are no septic tanks on site or proximate to the site. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result
of this project.
12.e
The project will result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations to the existing storm water
drainage facilities. The existing grouted tip-rap trapezoidal channel along the north side of Pala Road has a limited
capacity. The xm'n,ainlng flows spread out as a shallow flood plain across the entire road width of Pala Road. These
flows approach Loma Linda Road as a 750 foot wide flood plain. The project will not be permitted to increase
flows or divert flows to impact any adjacent properties. It may also be necessary to install storm drain facilities
or other improvements along Temecula Lane and through the site to protect the project and eunvey storm flows
to an adequate outlet.
Due to a significant portion of the site being within a flood plain, the amount of CFS that crosses the site, and the
limited capacity of the existing storm drainage facilities, the proposed project will be conditioned to provide a
hydrology study and grading plan~, and submit storm drain improvement plans to ensure that tributary storm flows
asound the site will be conveyed to an acceptable outer prior to the issuance of a grading permit. The project will
also be conditioned for the developer to record a written offer to participate in, and waive all fights to object to
the formation of an Assessment Dis~ct for the consUucfion of the ultimate storm drain facilities for the Pala Road
conSdor area. Additional discussion of this issue is provided under Section 4.b. With the conditions of approval,
mitigation measures and payment &development impact fees described in this Initial Environmental Study, no
significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
R:~PLANNING\42~pa97ENV..doc
12.f. The project will not result in a need for new systems or substantial alterations to solid waste disposal systems. Any
potential impacts from solid waste created by this development can be addressed through participation in a Source
Reduction and Recycling Program implemented by the City. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of
this project.
12.g The project will not result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations to local or regional water
supplies. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
13. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal:
Potentially
Significant
Potentially Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
a. Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway?
[ I [ I [ I ix]
b. Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? [ ] [ ] [ ] [X]
e. Create light or glare? [ ] [ ] [X] [ ]
DISCUSSION OF THEENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
13.a The project will not affect a scenic vista or scenic highway. The project is not located in an area where there is
a scenic vista. Further, the City does not have any designated scenic highways. No significant impacts are
anticipated as a result of this project.
13.b The project will not have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect. The site is currently vacant without any
outstanding aesthetic qualities worth retaining. A landscape plan proposes a variety of trees shrubs and ground
cover to enhance the site. The proposed landscaping also provides park-like settings, shade and erosion control.
The proposed trees, shrubs and bushes are typical of the urban landscape in Temecula and will provide a visual
link with the established residential uses. The design review process ensured the proposed stsuctures were
compatible with the existing development in terms of colors, materials, bulk and mass and overall architectural
design. As proposed, the design is compatible with the existing development; therefore no significant impacts
are anticipated as a result of this project.
13.c The project will have a potentially si~ificant impact from light and glare. The project will produce and result
in light/glare, as all development of this nature results in new light sources. All light and glare has the potential
to impact the Mount Pulomar Observatory. The project will be conditioned to be consistent with Ordinance No.
655 (Ordinance Regulating Light Pollution). With this condition in place, no significant impacts are anticipated
as a result of this project.
14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal:
Potentially
Significant
Potentially Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
a. Disturb paleontological resources?
(Source 1, Figure 5-7, Page 5-22)
[ I [ ] ix] [1
b. Disturb archaeological resources?
(Source 1, Figure 5-6, Page 5-21)
[ I [ ] ix] [1
RAPLANNING~420pa97ENV..doc
c. Affect historical resources?
(Source 1, Figure 5-6, Page 5-21)
[ ] [ ] [ i
d. Have the potential to cause a physical change
which would affect unique etlmic cultural values
(Source 1, Figure 5-6, Page 5-21)
[ ] [ ] [ ] ix]
e. Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within
the potential impact area?
[ ] [ ] [ ] Ix]
DISCUSSION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMI~ACTS
14.a,b
The project location was sent to and reviewed by Eastern Information Center at the University of
California Riverside, Depar~ent of Anthropology. UCR reports that the project area has not been
previously surveyed for cultural resources and is located in a region known to contain cultural resources.
Therefore, the project will be conditioned to have a qualified archaeologist and paleontologist on site
during grading. As conditioned, no significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
14.c No historic resources exist at the site or are proximate to the site. The project will not have an impact on historical
resources. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
14.d The project will not have the potential to cause a physical change that would affect unique ethnic cultural values.
No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
14.e
The project will not restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area. No religious or
sacred uses exist at the site or are proximate to the site. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this
project.
15. RECREATION. Would the proposal:
Potentially
Significant
Potentially Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
a. Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks or
other recreational facilities?
[ ] [ ] [ ] ix]
b. Affect existing recreational opportunities?
[1 [1 [1 IX]
DISCUSSION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL IM]?ACTS
15.a,b
The project will have a less than significant impact or increase in demand for neighborhood or regional parks or
other recreational facilities. Although the subject site is located adjacent to the park, due to the age, health and
mobility of the residents, it is anticipated that the impact to the park will be minimal. Moreover, the proposed
senior facility is designed to provide substantial park-like amenities such as walking lxails, benches, a croquet .or
lawn bowling area, garden areas, water features, a pool and clubhouse to specifically accommodate the residents
recreational needs on-site. Due to the large number of recreatioual amenities provided for the residents on-site,
it is determined that the proposed project will not result in an increase in demand for neighborhood or regional
parks or other recreational facilities, or adversely affect the existing recreational resources or opportunities.
RAP LAblN INGM20pa97 ENV..doc
16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality
of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a
fish or wildlife species, came a fish or wildlife population
to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate
a plant or animal community, reduce the number of restrict
the range of a rare or endanget~l plant or animal or eliminate
important examples of the major periods of California history
or prehistory?
Does the project have the potential to achieve short-tem~, to the
disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals?
Does the project have impacts that area individually
limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively
considerable" means that the incremental effects of a
project is considerable when viewed in connection with
the effects of past projects, the effects of other ctuxent
projects, and the effects of probable future projects).
Does the project have environmental effects which will
came substantial adverse effects on human beings, either
directly or indirectly?
17. EARLIER ANALYSES.
None.
[] [] II tx]
[] [] [] tx]
[1 [1 []
SOURCES
I. City of Temecula General Plan.
2. City of Temecula General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report.
3. South Coast Air Quality Management District CEQA Air Quality Handbook.
4. City of Temecula Development Code
[] [1 [] tx]
R:~PLANNING\420pa97ENV..doc
ATTACHMENT 3
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
PA97-0420
R:\E O 352.001~01-0445 Alpine Gardens East 2nd EOT~Staff Report.doc
10
Mitigation Monitoring Program
Planning Application No. PA97-0420 (Development Plan)
Geologic Problems
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
Expose people to impacts from seismic ground shaking.
Ensure that soil compaction is to City Standards.
A soils repOrt prepared by a registered Civil Engineer shall be
submitted to the Depadment of Public Works with the initial grading
plan check. Building pads shall be certified by a registered Civil
Engineer.
Prior to the issuance of grading and building permits.
Department of Public Works and Building and Safety Department.
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
Expose people to impacts from seismic ground shaking.
Utilize construction techniques that are consistent with the Uniform
Building Code.
Submit construction plans to the Building and Safety Department for
approval.
Prior to the issuance of a building permit.
Building and Safety Department.
General Impact:
Mitigation Measures:
Specific Processes:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil conditions from
excavation, grading or fill.
Planting of slopes consistent with Ordinance No. 457.
Submit erosion control plans for approval by the Department of Public
Works.
Prior to the issuance of a grading permit.
Department of Public Works.
R:~P LANNING\420pa97 ENV..doc
General Impact:
Mitigation Measures:
Specific Processes:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
Water
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone: ·
Responsible Monitoring Party:
Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil conditions from
excavation, grading or fill.
Planting of on-site landscaping that is consistent with the Development
Code.
Submit landscape plans that include planting of slope to the Planning
Department for approval.
Prior to the issuance of a building permit.
Planning Department.
The project will result in changes to absorption rates, drainage patterns
and the rate and amount of surface runoff.
The project will be conditioned to control runoff from the site and
through the site so that it Mil not negatively impact adjacent properties,
including drainage conveyances and storm drainage facilities.
The applicant shall submit a grading and drainage plan to the
Department of Public Works for approval.
Prior to the issuance of grading permit.
Department of Public Works.
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
The project will result in changes to absorption rates, drainage patterns
and the rate and amount of surface runoff.
The project is conditioned for the developer to record a written offer to
participate in, and waive all rights to object to the formation of an
Assessment District for the construction of the ultimate storm drain
facilities.
Prior to the issuance of grading permit.
Department of Public Works.
R:~PLANN rNG\420pa97 EN¥..d~c
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
The project will result in exposure of people or property to water
related hazards such as flooding.
The project will be conditioned to provide a hydrology study and
submit storm di'ain improvement plans to ensure that the on-site
structures will be floodproofed and that tributary storm flows around
the site will be conveyed to an acceptable outlet.
The applicant shall submit a grading and drainage plan to the
Department of Public Works for approval.
Prior to the issuance of grading permit.
Department of Public Works.
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
The project will result in exposure of people or property to water
related hazards such as flooding.
The project may be conditioned to record a written offer to participate in,
and waive all rights to object to the formation of an Assessment District for
the construction of the ultimate storm drain facilities. In addition, due to
the magnitude of the storm flows tributary to this site and the size of the
facilities necessary to convey these flows, it may be necessary for the
developer to coordinate the design with the adjacent land owners to fund
the construction of the ultimate storm drain facilities.
Submit signed conditions of approval for this project as approved by
the Planning Commission within three days of approval of the project.
Prior to the issuance of grading permits.
Department of Public Works.
RSPLANNINGM.20pa97ENV..doc
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
Discharge into surface waters or other alteration of surface water
qualitY (e.g. temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbiditY).
An erosion control plan shall be prepared in accordance with CitY
requirements and a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)
shall be prepared in accordance with the National Pollution Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) requirements.
The applicant shall submit a SWPPP to the San Diego Regional Water
QualitY Control Board (SDRWQCB) for their review and approval.
Prior to the issuance of a grading permit.
Department of Public Works and SDRWQCB (for SWPPP).
Transportation/Circulation
Genera[ Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
Increase in vehicle trips or traffic congestion.
Payment of Development Impact Fee for road improvements and traffic
impacts.
Pay the appropriate fee in the amount in effect at the time of submittal.
Prior to the issuance of building permits.
Depa~hnent of Public Works.
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
Increase in vehicle trips or.traffic congestion.
The project will be conditioned to improve their half of Pala Road (interim
improvements), and Loam Linda Road and Temecula Lane to the ultimate
General Plan build-out including paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street
lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not
limited to water and sewer). The project will also be conditioned to widen
the existing bridge at the intersection of Pala Road and Loma Linda Road
to accommodate the project related stxeet improvements and to install a
traffic signal at the intersection of Loma Linda Road and Pala Road to
include signal interconnect with the signal at the intersection of Pala Road
and Highway 79 South.
Submit road improvement plans (including widening of the bridge and
the street ligh0 as approved by the Planning Commission.
Submit road improvement plans with precise grading plans prior to
issuance of building permits.
Department of Public Works.
R:~P L ANNING\420pa97 ENV..d oc
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Increase in vehicle trips or traffic congestion and conflicts with adopted
policies supporting alternative transportation.
The project will be conditioned to install a bus turnout as required by
Riverside Transit Agency and bicycle lanes along Pala Road and Loma
Linda Road as required pursuant to the General Plan Circulation
Element.
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
Biological Resources
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
Submit road improvement plans that comply with the approved site plan
and the General Plan Circulation Element.
Submit road improvement plans with precise grading plans.
Department of Public Works.
Endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats (including but
not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals and birds).
Pay Mitigation Fee for impacts to Stephens Kangaroo Rat.
Pay $500.00 per acre of disturbed area of Stephens Kangaroo Rat
habitat.
Prior to the issuance of a grading permit.
Department of Public Works and Planning Department
Energ3' and Mineral Resources
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
Affect upon energy conservation plans.
Compliance with all applicable laws pertaining to energy conservation.
Submit energy calculations and pertinent data for review.
Prior to the issuance of a building permit.
Building and Safety Department
R:~PLANN1NG\420pa97ENV..doc
Public Services
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
A substantial effect upon and a need for new/altered governmental
services regarding fire and police protection. The project will
incrementally increase the need for fire and police protection; however,
it will contribute its fair share to the maintenance of service provision.
Payment of Fire Mitigafio~ Fees.
Payment of Development Impact Fee for fire mitigation.
Prior to the issuance of building permit.
Building & Safety Department
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
The proposal will result in a need for new systems or supplies, or
substantial alterations to the storm water drainage facilities.
The project will be conditioned to provide a hydrology study and
submit storm drain improvement plans to ensure that tributary stOrm
flows around the site will be conveyed to an acceptable outlet with
adequate capacity.
Submit drainage improvement plans that illustrate an acceptable
drainage facility with adequate capacity as stated in the hydrology
study.
Prior to the issuance of grading permits.
Department of Public Works.
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
The proposal will result in a need for new systems or supplies, or
substantial alterations to the storm water drainage facilities.
The project may be conditioned to record a written offer to participate in,
and waive all fights to object to the formation of an Assessment District for
the construction of the ultimate storm drain facilities. In addition, due to
the magnitude of the storm flows tributary to this site and the size of the
facilities necessary to convey these flows, it may be necessary for the
developer to coordinate the design with the adjacent land owners to fund
the construction of the ultimate storm drain facilities.
Submit signed conditions of approval for this project as approved by
the Planning Commission within three days of approval of the project.
Prior to the issuance of grading permits.
Department of Public Works.
R:',P LANN ING',420pa97 ENV..d oc
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
Aesthetics
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
A substantial effect upon and a need for maintenance of public
facilities, including roads.
Payment of Development Impact Fee for road improvements, traffic
impacts, and Public facilities.
Pay the appropriate fee in the amount in effect at the time of submittal.
Prior to the issuance of building permits.
Department of Public Works.
The project will be compatible with the existing area and not have a
negative aesthetic effect.
Compliance with the approved elevations, colors and materials.
Submit construction plans that are consistent with the approved
elevations, colors and materials.
Prior to the issuance of a building permit, review plans for compliance
with Planning Commission approval.
'Planning Department.
The project will create light and glare.
Compliance with Mt. Palomar Observatory Light Pollution Ordinance.
Outdoor lighting fixtures shall be low pressure sodium on building
plans.
Prior to the issuance of a building permit.
Planning Department.
R:h° LANrN ING~420p a97 ENV..doc
Cultural_Resources
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Party:
Disturb paleontological or cultural resources.
Require a Paleontologist to monitor on-site during grading.
The applicant and a qualified Vertebrate Paleontologist shall meet with
the Planning Manager to discuss the potential for significant resources
and to establish an on-site monitoring
Prior to the issuance of a grading permit.
Planning Department
Disturb paleontological resources.
Require a Paleontologist to monitor on-site during grading.
A qualified Vertebrate Paleontologist shall be present on site if
necessary as determined by the pre-grading meeting with the Planning
Manager.
Prior m the issuance of a grading permit.
Planning Department
ATrACHMENT NO. 4
EXHIBITS
R:\E O T'~_001~1-0445 Alpine Gardens East 2nd EOT~Staff Report.doc
11
CITY OF TEMECULA
DR
Project Site
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 01-0445 (Extension of Time)
EXHIBIT A
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - April 24, 2002
VICINITY MAP
R:\E O 'T~?.001\01-0445 Alpine Gardens East 2nd EO'l'~Staff Report.doc
12
CITY OF TEMECULA
SP-12
Project Site
EXHIBIT B
DESIGNATION - Professional Office (PO)
ZONING MAP
Project Site
EXHIBIT C
DESIGNATION - Professional Office (PO)
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 01-0445 (Extension of Time)
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - April 24, 2002
GENERAL PLAN
R:'~E O T~2001~1-0445 Alpine Gardens East 2nd EOT~Staff Repod.doc
13
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 01-0445 (Extension of Time)
EXHIBIT D
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE ~ April 24, 2002
SITE PLAN I
R:~E O T~2001~01-0445 Alpine Gardens East 2nd EO'r'~Staff Report.doc
ITEM 7
R:\PLANCOMM~Agendas~002\4-24-02.doc
6
STAFF REPORT- PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
April 24, 2002
Planning Application No. 01-0539 (Development Plan)
Prepared By: Matthew Harris, Associate Planner
1. ADOPT a Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. 01-0539 (Development Plan)
pursuant to Section 15332 of the California Environmental Quality Act;
2, ADOPT a Resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2002-__
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 01-
0539, DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT, ESTABLISH AND
OPERATE A 18,894 SQUARE FOOT TWO-STORY OFFICE/
WAREHOUSE BUILDING ON A .96 ACRE SITE GENERALLY
LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ENTERPRISE CIRCLE
NORTH, 230 FEET NORTH OF WINCHESTER ROAD KNOWN AS
ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 909-281-003
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
PROPOSAL:
LOCATION:
EXISTING ZONING:
SURROUNDING ZONING:
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION:
EXISTING LAND USE:
SURROUNDING LAND USES:
David Wakefield, Davcon Development
A proposal to design, construct and operate an 18,894
square foot office/warehouse building.
West side of Enterprise Circle North, approximately 230
feet north of Winchester Road
Business Park (BP)
North: Business Park (BP)
South: Business Park (BP) '
East: Business Park (BP)
West: Conservation (OS-C)
Business Park (BP)
Vacant
North: Industrial Building
South: Industrial Building
East: Industrial Building
West: Santa Gertrudis Creek Channel
R:~D Px2001\014)539 Gospel Recordings\Staff Report and COAs.doc
I
PROJECT STATISTICS (DEVELOPMENT PLAN)
Lot aroa (net) .96 acre
Footprint:
9,447 square feet
Building square footage:
18,894 square feet
Building height: 29'-0"
Landscaped area:
10,539 square feet (25.05%)
Parking required:
49 vehicular, 3 handicapped, 3 bicycle, and 2 motorcycle
Parking provided:
51 vehicular, 3 handicapped, 3 bicycle, and 2 motorcycle
Lot coverage: 22.59%
Floor area ratio: 40%
BACKGROUND
The applicant submitted a Development Plan ~pplication on October 30, 2001. Staff subsequently
expressed a variety of amhitectural and site design concerns with the applicant. Amhitectural issues
included the size and type of windows proposed and the depth of the entry frame at both the main
and secondary building entrances. Site design issues included the lack of a loading space,
motomycle and bicycle parking spaces onsite and accessibility to the onsite trash enclosure.
The revised plans adequately address staff's concerns.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant proposes to construct a two-story office/warehouse building with a gross useable floor
area of 16,803 square feet. The building is approximately 80 feet wide and 115 feet long, and will
be sited generally in the center of the project site (and oriented to face east). The building will have
a 65-foot front setback from the Enterprise Circle North right-of-way. Within that setback there will be
a landscape planter along Enterprise Circle averaging 14 feet in width. The building is intended to
be a corporate headquarters with 13,803 square feet of office space and 3,000 square feet of
warehouse space. The building's main entrance will be accessed along the east side of the
building. A secondary entrance will be provided along the north side. In addition, a roll-up delivery
door will be accessed from the west (rear) side of the building. Access to the site will be from a
single driveway off Enterprise Cjrole North. Onsite parking will be located along the north, east and
west sides of the building.
The proposed building will be constructed of tilt-up concrete with a plain painted finish. An additional
two feet of width was added to the entry frame projections at both the main and secondary building
entrances to provide depth and stronger shadows. The front (east) and north sides of the building
feature a recessed aluminum storefront with green reflective glass. Green reflective spandrel glass
will be utilized above the main and secondary building entrances. Decorative light fixtures will be
placed on each side of the main building entrance for formality, in addition, spandrel glass will be
utilized at the northeast and southeast building corners which serves to break-up wall planes. Wider
windows with varying offsets were incorporated into the southern and western building elevations.
Three differen~ paint colors will be used on the building's exterior.
R:XD PX2001\01-0539 Gospel RecordingsXStaff Report and COAs.doc
2
With regard to landscaping, the plan shows a planter averaging 14 feet in width along the Enterprise
Circle North frontage, consisting of bottle trees, fern pines, flowering pear trees, turf, and assorted
shrubbery. Around the periphery of the parking area, a minimum five-foot wide planter will be
provided with a mixture of bottle and london plane trees and assorted shrubbery. Landscape
planters along the north and south sides of the building will be planted with five bottle trees, three
flowering pear trees and assorted shrubbery. Fern pines will be planted on both sides of the main
and secondary building entrances.
ANALYSIS
Building Design
The building design is consistent with the requirements of the Development Code, and Design
Guidelines and is consistent with adjacent industrial buildings. The additional two feet of width
added to the entry frames at both the primary and secondary building entrances, along with the
recessed storefronts will ensure effective depth. Moreover, the entry frame features and use of
spandrel glass at the building corners will prohibit the building from having a box-like appearance.
The wider offset windows along the southern and western elevations will create balance and visual
interest. The scale, form and colors of the building are in proportion with the surrounding area.
A combination of both wall and pole lighting will be utilized to illuminate the off-street parking
facilities. Condition of Approval No. 14 requires that the applicant submit a parking lot lighting plan
for review and approval prior to issuance of a grading permit. The plan will ensure that the lighting is
designed and maintained in a manner which prevents glare or direct illumination from intruding onto
adjacent properties.
Landscaping
The landscape plan conforms to the landscape requirements of the Development Code and Design
Guidelines, and the City's consulting landscape amhitect recommends approval of the plan. Tree
placement within planters adjacent to the building will serve to effectively soffen the building
elevations. Moreover, the proposed trees and shrubbery within the planter abutting the Enterprise
Circle North frontage will serve to screen the off-street parking area from the street. Conditions of
approval have also been added which require a one-year landscape maintenance bond to be
submitted prior to occupancy (Condition No. 20); and that the location of the parking lot lighting
fixtures not adversely impact the growth potential of the parking lot trees (Condition No. 14).
Site Plan
The project conforms to all of the development regulations of the Business Park (BP) zoning district.
The building setbacks exceed the minimum requirements of the Development Code. The proposed
22% lot coverage is well below the maximum permitted lot coverage of 40%. The building complies
with maximum floor area ratio requirements. In addition, the plan also exceeds the minimum number
of required parking spaces, and the distribution of the parking is functional and accessible to all
building entry points. So as to further enhance onsite aesthetics, decorative paving treatments will
be utilized at both primary and secondary building entrances as well as the entry drive.
Access and Circulation
The Public Works Department has analyzed the projected traffic impact of the project and
determined that the impacts are consistent with the traffic volumes projected for the site by the
General Plan EIR. The Fire Department has also reviewed the plan and determined that there is
proper access and circulation to provide emergency services to the site.
R:~D P~2001\01 ~)539 Gospel Recordings~Sta ff Report and COAs.doc
3
Flagpoles
The site plan shows a semicircle of five flagpoles to be located at the northeast corner of the
building. The intended occupant (Gospel Recordings) has personnel working in 35 countries around
the world. When these personnel visit or return home on furlough, the property owner desires to fly
the flag of the specific nation with which a particular person is associated. However, Section
17.28.050.C.2 of the Development Code only provides for the flying of two international flags in
addition to the American Flag per parcel. In order to allow four international flags, the Planning
Commission would have to make specific variance findings. Staff does not believe that variance
findings can be made and therefore, recommends that the final site plan be modified to show three
flag poles prior to issuance of a building permit.
Environmental Determination
The project is exempt from environmental review based on Section 15332 (In-Fill Development
Projects) of the California Environmental Quality Act and there are no potentially significant
environmental constraints on the site. The project qualifies for an infill development exemption
because the project is consistent with the General Plan designation and zoning regulations; is
located on a site within the city limits which is served by all utilities; and is less than 5 acres in area.
CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION
Staff has determined that the proposed project is consistent with the City's Design Guidelines and
conforms to all of the applicable development regulations. Staff recommends approval of the
Development Plan with the attached conditions of approval.
FINDINGS
Development Plan (Section 17.05.010F)
The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan and with all applicable
requirements of state law and other City ordinances. The plan to develop an 18,894 square
foot, two-story office/warehouse building is consistent with the Business Park (BP) policies,
City-Wide Design Guidelines and development regulations. The proposed plan incorporates
amhitectural and landscape designs, which will achieve the City's General Plan Community
Design Goal #3, "Preservation and enhancement of the positive qualities of individual
districts or neighborhoods ".
The 18,894 square foot office/warehouse building complies with all applicable development
standards of the Business Park (BP) zoning district as well as off-street parking and
landscaping requirements.
The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health,
safety, and general welfare. The project has been conditioned to conform to the Uniform
Building Code, and all construction will be inspected by City staff prior to occupancy. The
Fire Department staff has also found that the site design will provide adequate emergency
access in the case of a need for emergency response to the site.
R:\D PX2001\01-0539 Gospel Recordings\Staff Report ~nd COAs.doc
4
· Attachments:
1. PC Resolution No.- 02-
- Blue Page 6
Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 9
Exhibits - Blue Page 20
A. Vicinity Map
B. General Plan Map
C. Zoning Map
D. Site Plan
E. Grading Plan
F. Building Elevations
G. Floor Plan
H. Landscape Plan
R:\D PX2001\01-0539 Gospel Recordings\Staff Report and COAs.doc
5
A'I'rACHMENT NO. 1
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2002-
R:XD P~2001\01-0539 Gospel Recordings\Staff Report and COAs.doc
6
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2002-__
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 01-
0539, DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT, ESTABLISH AND
OPERATE A 18,894 SQUARE FOOT TWO-STORY
OFFICE/WAREHOUSE BUILDING ON A .96 ACRE SITE
GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ENTERPRISE
CIRCLE NORTH, 230 FEET NORTH OF WINCHESTER ROAD
KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 909-281-003
WHEREAS, Davcon Development, filed Planning Application No. PA01-0539 Development
Plan "Application"), in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development
Code;
WHEREAS, the Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the
time and manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application on
April 24, 2002, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and
interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this
matter;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the
testimony, the Commission recommended approval of the Application subject to and based upon
the findings set forth hereunder;
WHEREAS, all legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by
reference.
Section 2. Findinqs. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby
makes the following findings as required by Section 176.05.010F of the Temecula Municipal Code:
The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan and with all applicable
requirements of state law and other City ordinances. The plan to develop an 18,894 square
foot, two-story office/warehouse building is consistent with the Business Park (BP) policies,
City-Wide Design Guidelines and development regulations. The proposed plan incorporates
architectural and landscape designs, which will achieve the City's General Plan Community
Design Goal #3, "Preservation and enhancement of the positive qualities of individual
districts or neighborhoods ".
The 18,894 square foot office/warehouse building complies with all applicable development
standards of the Business Park (BP) zoning district as well as off-street parking and
landscaping requirements.
R:~D Px2001\01~)539 Gospel RecordingsXStaff Re~ort and COAs.doc
7
2. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health,
safety, and general welfare. The project has been conditioned to conform to the Uniform
Building Code, and all construction will be inspected by City staff prior to occupancy. The
Fire Department staff has also found that the site design will provide adequate emergency
access in the case of a need for emergency response to the site.
Section3. Environmental Compliance. The project will have no significant
environmental impacts and has been found to be categorically exempt, Pursuant to Section 15332
class 32 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines.
Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby
conditionally approves the Application, a request to develop an 18,894 square foot, two-story
office/warehouse building set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this
reference together with any and all necessary conditions that may be deemed necessary.
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning
Commission this 24th day of April 2002.
ATTEST:
Dennis Chiniaeff, Chairperson
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that
PC Resolution No. 02-__was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 24th day of April, 2002, by the following vote of
the Commission:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
R:~D P~2001~,0143539 Gospel Recordings~Staff Report and COAs.doc
8
EXHIBIT A
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
R:~D PX2001\01-0539 Gospel Recordings\Staff Report and COAs.doc
9
Planning Application No.:
Project Description:
Development Impact Fee Category:
Assessor's Parcel No.:
Approval Date:
Expiration Date:
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
PA01-0539 Development Plan
Planning Application to construct, establish
and operate an 18,894 square foot
office/warehouse building on .96 acres of
vacant land.
The Development Impact Fee for the project
will be Business Park/Industrial
909-281-003
April 24, 2002
April 24, 2004
PLANNING DIVISION
Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project
1. The applicant shall deliver to the Community Development Department - Planning Division a
· cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty-
Four Dollars ($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of
Exemption required under Public Resources Code Section 21108(b) and Califomia Code of
Regulations Section 15075. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant has not
delivered to the Community Development Department - Planning Division the check as
required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of
condition [Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)].
General Requirements
2. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to
indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend with Legal Counsel of the City's own
selection, the City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or
instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees,
consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents from anyand all claims, actions, awards,
judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, void, annul, seek monetary
damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of
the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or
legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning
Application.
3. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or
proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the
defense of the action. The City reserves its right to take any and all action the City deems to
, be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense.
R:~D 1~2001\01-0539 Gospel Recordings~Staff Report and COAs.doc
l0
o
All conditions shall be complied with prior to any occupancy or use allowed by this
Development Plan.
The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of
this development plan.
This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall
become null and void. By use is meant the' beginning of substantial construction
contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period, which is thereafter diligently
pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this
approval.
The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibits D
(Site Plan), E (Grading Plan), F (Building Elevation), G (Floor Plan), H (Landscape Plan),
and I (Color and Material Board) contained on file with the Community Development
Department- Planning Division.
Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable
satisfaction of the Planning Director. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being
maintained, the Planning Director shall have the authority to require the property owner to
bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued
maintenance of a~l landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any
successors in interest.
All mechanical and roof equipment shall be fully screened from public view by being placed
below the lowest level of the surrounding parapet wall.
The colors and materials for the project shall substantially conform to those noted directly
below and with Exhibit 'T' (Color and Material Board), contained on file with the Community
Development Department - Planning Division.
Exterior Colors: Accent at Roofline
Body of Building
Entry Frames, Base, Corner Columns
Building Glazing
Frazee paint #8260W "Pavilion"
Frazee paint #8262W "Peanut Shell"
Frazee paint #8264D 'q'ucson Clay"
Visteon Versalux ~A "Green 2000R"
11. The construction landscape drawings shall indicate coordination and grouping of all utilities,
which are to be screened from view per applicable City Codes and guidelines.
Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits
12. The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be provided
by the Community Development Department - Planning Division staff, and return one signed
set to the Community Development Department - Planning Division for their files.
13. The applicant shall submit to the Community Development Department - Planning Division
for permanent filing two (2) 8" X 10" glossy photographic color prints of the approved Color
and Materials Board and of the colored version of approved Exhibit "F", the colored
architectural elevations to the Community Development Department - Planning Division for
their files. All labels on the Color and Materials Board and Elevations shall be readable on
the photographic prints.
14. The applicant shall submit a parking lot lighting plan to the Planning Department which
meets the requirements of the Development Code and the Palomar Lighting Ordinance.
The parking lot light standards shall be placed in such a way as to not adversely impact the
growth potential of the parking lot trees.
15. A copy of the Grading Plan shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Department.
R:XD P~200 I\0 ! -0539 Gospel Recordings\Staff Repo¢~ and COAs.doc
Il
16. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal
Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that Ordinance or by
providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid.
Prior to Issuance of Building Permit
17. A Consistency Check fee shall be paid per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule.
18. Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and
approved by the Community Development Department - Planning Division. These plans
shall conform substantially with the approved Exhibit "H", or as amended by these
conditions. The location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be
shown. The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The plans shall be
accompanied by the following items:
a. Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal).
b. One (1) copy of the approved grading plan.
c. Water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water
Efficient Ordinance).
d. Total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with the approved
plan).
19. The final project site plan shall be modified so as to show a total of three flag poles on the
project site.
Prior to Building Occupancy
20. The property owner shall fully install all required landscaping and irrigation, and submit a
landscape maintenance bond in a form and amount approved by the Planning Department
for a period of one-year from the date of the first occupancy permit.
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
Unless otherwise noted, all conditions shall be completed by the Developer at no cost to any
Government Agency. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the site plan all existing
and proposed property lines, easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage
courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and revision.
General Requirements
21. A Grading Permit for precise grading, including all on-site flat work and improvements, shall
be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any
construction outside of the City-maintained street right-of-way.
22. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way.
23. All grading plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing
improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of
Temecula mylars.
Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit
24. A permit from Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation Distdct is required for
work within their right-of-way.
25. A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed and
approved by the Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include all necessary
erosion control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and private property.
R:~D PL2001 \01-0539 Gospel Reco[dings~Sta ff Report mad COAs.doc
12
26. The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and
erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to
approval by the Department of Public Works.
27. A Soil Report shall be prepared by a registered Soil or Civil Engineer and submitted to the
Director of the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report
shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the
construction of engineered structures and pavement sections:
28. The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No
grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or the
project is shown to be exempt.
29. The Developer shall have a Drainage Study prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in
accordance with City Standards identifying storm water runoff expected from this site and
upstream of this site. The study shall identify all existing or proposed public or private
drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. The study shall also analyze and identify
impacts to downstream properties and provide specific recommendations to protect the
properties and mitigate any impacts. Any upgrading or upsizing of downstream facilities,
including acquisition of drainage or access easements necessary to make required
improvements, shall be provided by the Developer.
30. As deemed necessary by the Director of the Department of Public Works, the Developer
shall receive written clearance from the following agencies:
a. San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board
b. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
c. Planning Department
d. Department of Public Works
e. Rancho California Water District
31. The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an Environmental
Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject property.
32. Permanent landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department
and the Department of Public Works for review and approval.
33. The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or slope easements for off-site
work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public Works.
34. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by either cashier's check or
money order, prior to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area drainage plan fee. If
the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been credited to this
property, no new charge needs to be paid.
Prior to Issuance of a Building Permit
35. Precise grading plans shall conform to applicable City of Temecula Standards subject to
approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works. The following design criteria
shall be observed:
a. Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over A.C.
paving.
b. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula Standard No. 207A.
c. All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees.
R:',D PL2001\01-0539 Gospel RecordingskStaff Report and COAs.doc
13
d. Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and
adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility.
e. All concentrated drainage directed towards the public street shall be conveyed
through undersidewalk drains.
36. A construction area Traffic Control Plan shall be designed by a registered Civil or Traffic
Engineer and reviewed by the Director of the Department of Public Works for any street
closure and detour or other disruption to traffic circulation as required by the Department of
Public Works.
37. The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance with
the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered Civil Engineer, and the Soil Engineer
shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions.
38. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as
required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all
Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06.
Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy
39. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
a. Rancho California Water District
b. Eastern Municipal Water District
c. Department of Public Works
40. All public improvements shatl be constructed and completed per the approved plans and
City standards to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works.
41. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall
be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of
Public Works.
FIRE DEPARTMENT
42. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by
the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the
California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in
force at the time of building plan submittal.
43. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or
construction of all commercial buildings per CFC Appendix III.A, Table A-III-A-1. The
developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 1875 GPM at
20-PSI residual operating pressure, plus an assumed sprinkler demand of 850 GPM for a
total fire flow of 2725 GPM with a 3-hour duration. The required fire flow may be adjusted
during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire
protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire Flow as given
above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC 903.2, Appendix Ill-A)
44. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC
Appendix Ill-B, Table A-III-B-1. A minimum of 4 hydrants, in a combination of on-site and off-
site (6" x 4" x 2-2 1/2" outlets) shall be located on Fire Department access roads and
adjacent public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 350 feet apart, at each intersection and
shall be located no more than 210 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department
access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any
adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required.
(CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix Ill-B)
R:~D P~2001\0143539 Gospel Recordings~Staff Report and COAs.dec
45.
46.
47.
48.
49.
50.
51.
52.
53.
54.
55.
As required by the California Fire Code, when any portion of the facility is in excess of 150
feet from a water supply on a public street, as measured by an approved route around the
exterior of the facility, on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire
flow shall be provided. For this project on site fire hydrants are required. (CFC 903.2)
If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection prior
to any building construction. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2)
Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have
approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent roads
are installed. Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface for
80,000 lbs. GVW. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2)
Prior 1o building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved Fire
Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or any
portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be an all
weather surface designed for 80,000 lbs. GVW with a minimum AC thickness of .25 feet. (
CFC sec 902)
Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than
twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13)
feet six (6) inches. (CFC 902.2.2.1)
The gradient for fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed fifteen (15) percent. (CFC
902.2.2:6 Ord. 99-14)
Prior to building construction, dead end roadways and streets in excess of one hundred and
fifty (150) feet.which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of
accommodating fire apparatus. (CFC 902.2.2.4)
Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water
system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall be
signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature
block; and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. After
the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be presented to the Fire
Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system including fire hydrants shall be
installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building
materials being placed on an individual lot. (CFC 8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and National Fire
Protection Association 24 1-4.1 )
Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective Markers"
shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations. (CFC 901.4.3)
Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, approved numbers or
addresses shall be provided on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be
plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Numbers shall be of a
contrasting color to their background. Commercial, multi-family residential and industrial
buildings shall have a minimum twelve (12) inches numbers with suite numbers a minimum
of six (6) inches in size. All suites shall have a minimum of six (6) inch high letters and/or
numbers on both the front and rear doors. Single-family residences and multi-family
residential units shall have four (4) inch letters and/or numbers, as approved by the Fire
Prevention Bureau. (CFC 901.4.4)
Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on square footage and
type of construction, occupancy or use, the developer shall install a fire sprinkler system.
Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval pdor to
installation. (CFC Article 10, CBC Chapter 9)
R:kD Pk2001\014~539 G~spel Recordings\Staff Repor~ and COAs.doc
~5
56. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on a requirement for
monitoring the sprinkler system, occupancy or use, the developer shall install an fire alarm
system monitored by an approved Underwriters Laboratory listed central station. Plans shall
be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. (CFC Article 10)
57. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a "Knox-Box" shall be
provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six (6) feet in height and be located
to the right side of the main entrance door. (CFC 902.4)
58. All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates
obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox' Rapid entry
system for emergency access by fire fighting personnel. (CFC 902.4)
59, Prior to final inspection of any building, the applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire
Department for approval, a site plan designating Fire Lanes with appropriate lane painting
.and or signs.
60. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, building final or occupancy, buildings
housing high-piled combustible stock shall comply with the provisions of Uniform Fire Code
Article 81 and all applicable National Fire Protection Association standards. The storage of
high-piled combustible stock may require structural design considerations or modifications to
the building. Fire protection and life safety features may include some or all of the following:
an automatic fire sprinkler system(s) designed for a specific commodity class and storage
arrangement, hose stations, alarm systems, smoke vents, draft curtains, Fire Department
access doors and Fire department access reads. (CFC Article 81)
Special Conditions
61. Prior to building permit issuance, a full technical report may be required to be submitted and
to the Fire Prevention Bureau. This report shall address, but not be limi(ed to, all fire and life
safety measures per 1998 CFC, 1998 CBC, NFPA - 13, 24, 72 and 231-C.
62. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final a simple plot plan and a
simple floor plan, each as an electronic file of the .DWG format must be submitted to the
Fire Prevention Bureau. Alternative file formats may be acceptable, contact fire prevention
for approval.
63. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Fire Code permit process and
update any changes in the items and quantities approved as part of their Fire Code permit.
These changes shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for review and approval per
the Fire Code and is subject to inspection. (CFC 105)
64. The applicant shall submit for review and approval by the Riverside County Department of
Environmental Health and City Fire Department an update to the Hazardous Material
Inventory Statement and Fire Department Technical Report on file at the city; should any
quantities used or stored onsite increase or should changes to operation introduce any
additional hazardous material not listed in existing reports. (CFC Appendix II-E)
COMMUNITY SERVICES
65. All perimeter landscaping and parkways shall be maintained by the property owner or private
maintenance association.
66. The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of
construction debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul construction debris.
67. The developer shall provide adequate space for a recycling bin within the trash enclosure
area.
R:kD PL?.001\014}539 Gospel Recordings~Staff RepoCt and COAs.doc
68. The applicant shall provide both temporary (during construction) and permanent protection
of Santa Gertrudis Creek against runoff, silt, sand and other debris that may drain into the
creek.
BUILDING AND SAFETY
69. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 1998 edition of the
California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 1998 National Electrical Code;
California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy and Disabled Access Regulations and the
Temecula Municipal Code.
70. Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plans showing compliance
with Ordinance No. 855 for the regulation of light pollution. All streetlights and other outdoor
lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and
Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly upon
adjoining property or public rights-of-way.
71. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted to
the Building & Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School
Mitigation Fees.
72. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction
work.
73. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review.
74. Disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building is required. The
path of travel shall.meet the California Disabled Access Regulations in terms of cross slope,
travel slope stripping and signage. Provide all details on plans. (California Disabled Access
Regulations effective April 1, 1998)
75. All building and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations. Provide
all details on plans. (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1, 1998)
76. Provide disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building.
77. Provide van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entry.
78. Show path of accessibility from parking to furthest point of improvement.
79. Provide house electrical meter provisions for power for the operation of exterior lighting, fire
alarm systems.
80. Restroom fixtures, number and type, to be in accordance with the provisions of the 1998
edition of the California Building Code Appendix 29. Obtain the Division of the State
Architect recommendation for the accessible restroom dimensions for toddlers from the
Building Official, to implement in the building design.
81. Provide an approved automatic fire sprinkler system.
82. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans pdor
to permit issuance.
83. Provide electrical plan including Icad calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic
and mechanical plan for plan review.
84. Truss calculations that are stamped by the engineer of record and the truss manufacturer
engineer are required for plan review submittal.
85. Provide precise grading plan for plan check submittal to check for handicap accessibility.
86. A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the
building construction.
R:X,D P~2001\01-0539 Gospel Recordings~,Staff Report and COAs,doc
87. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standard and any block walls if not on the approved
building plans, will require separate approvals and permits.
88. Show all building setbacks.
89. Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrance to the project that indicates the hours
of construction, shown below, as allowed by the City of Temecula Ordinance No. 0-90-04,
specifically Section G (1) of Riverside County Ordinance No. 457.73, for any site within one-
quarter mile of an occupied residence.
Monday-Friday 6:30 a.m. - 6:30 p.m.
Saturday 7:00 a.m. - 6:30 p.m.
No work is permitted on Sunday or Government Holidays
POLICE DEPARTMENT
90. The construction plans shall indicate the application of painted rooftop addressing plotted on
a 9-inch grid pattern with 45-inch tall numerals spaced 9-inch apart. The numerals shall be
painted with a standard 9-inch paint roller using fluorescent yellow paint applied over a
contrasting background. The address shall be oriented to the street and placed as closely as
possible to the edge of the building closest to the street.
OUTSIDE AGENCIES
91. The applicant shall comply with the attached letter dated November 14, 2001 from the
California Historical Resources Information System.
92. The applicant shall comply with the attached letter dated November 7, 2001 from Rancho
Water.
93. The applicant shall comply with the attached letter dated November 14, 2001 from County of
Riverside Department of Environmental Health.
By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above
Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance
with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be
subject to Community Development Department approval.
Applicant's Signature
Date
Name printed
R:~D Px2001\01-0539 Gospel RecordingsXStaff Report and COAs.doc
18
~ALIFORNIA
HISTORICAL
RESOURCES
INFORMATION
~YSTEM
P=~ I/EIC./RNTHRO UCR
90D ?~-/ ~409 P.01/01
Eastern Intormauon Center
Department o! Anthropology
University of California
Rivers[de, CA 92521-0418
Phone (909) 787-5745
F~x (909) 787.5409
November 14, 2001
TO: Matthew Harris
· City of Temecula Planning Department
RE: Cultural Resource Review
Case: PAO1-O539/Gospel Recordings
Records at the Eastern Information Center of the California Historical Resources Information
System have been reviewed to determine if this project would adversely affect prehistoric
or historic cultural resources:
m
m
The proposed project area has not been surveyed for cultural resources and contains or is adjacent to
known cultural resourcels}, A Phase I study is recommended.
Based upon existing data the proposed project area has the potential for containing cultural resources.
A Phase I study is recommended.
A Phase I cultural resource study (MF #
) identified one or more cultural resources.
The project area contains, or has the possibility of containing, cultural resources. However, due to the
nature of the project or prior data recovery studies, sn adverse effect on cultural resources is not
anticipated, Further study is not recommended.
A Phase I cultural resource study (MF #2277) identified no cultural resources. Further study is not
recommended.
There is a Iow probability of cultural resources. Further study is not recommended.
If, during construction, cultural resources are encountered, work should be halted or diverted in the
immediate area while a qualified archaeologist evaluates the finds and makes recommendations.
Due to the archaeological sensitivity of the area, earthmoving during construction should be monitored
by a professional archaeologist.
The submission of a cultural resource management report is recommended following guidelines for
Archaeological Resource Management Reports prepared by the California Office of Historic Preservation,
Preservarion Planning Eullerin 4la), December 1989.
m Phase I Records search and field survey
-- Phase II Testing [Evaluate resource significance; propose mitigation measures for "significant" sites.]
M Phase III Mitigation [Data recovery by excavation, preservation in place, or a combination of the
two.]
m Phase IV Monitor earthmoving activities
COMMENTS:
If you have any questions, please contact us.
Eastern Information Center
November 7, 2001
Matthew Harris, Associate Planner
City of Temecula
Planning Department
43200 Business Park Drive
Post Office Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
SUBJECT:
WATER AVAILABILITY
PARCEL NO. 3 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 19582-2
APN 909-281-003
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA01-0539
Dear Mr. Harris:
Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located within the
boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD). Water service,
therefore, would be available upon completion of financial arrangements between
RCWD and the property owner.
If fire protection is required, the customer will need to contact RCWD for fees and
requirements.
Water availability would be contingent upon the property owner signing an
Agency Agreement that assigns water management rights, if any, to RCWD.
If you should have any questions, please 'contact an Engineering Services
Representative at this office.
Sincerely,
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT
Steve Brannon, P.E.
Development Engineering Manager
0 l\SB:at267XF012-T3\FCF
F1 CDdNTY OF RIVERSIDE · HEAL, ,-I SERVICES AGENCY F1
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTE
November t4, 2001
Ci.ty of Temecula Planning Department
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589
RE: Plot Plan No. PA01-0539
Dear Matthew Harris:
1. The Deparm~ent of Environmental Health has reviewed the Plot Plan No. PA01-0539 and has no objections.
Sanitary sewer and water services are available in this area.
2. PRIOR TO ANY B[rlLDING PLAN CHECK APPROVAL for Environmental Health clearance, the
following items are required:
a) "Will-serve" letters ti-om the appropriate water and sewering agencies.
Sincerely,
Sam Martinez, Super~dsing Environmental Health Specialist
(909) 955-8980
NOTE: Any cra'rent additional requirements not covered can be applicable at time of Building Plan
review for final Department of Environmental Health clearance.
Local Enforcement Agency · ?O. Box 1280. Riverside. CA 925024280 · i9091 955-8982 · FAX (909) 781-9653 · 4080 Lemon 8::'~'et. 9th Floor. Riverside CA 92501
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
EXHIBITS
R:XD Pk2001k01-0539 Gospel Recordings~laff Report and COAs.doc
19
CITY OF TEMECULA
Project Site
CASE NO. - PA01-0539
EXHIBIT - A
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE- APRIL 24, 2002
VICINITY MAP
R:~D P'~2.001~01-0539 Gospel ReCOrdings~Staff Report and COAs.doc
CITY OFTEMECULA
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO,
000~00000~"~00000(
0000000000000000(
000000000000000~
00000000
00000000(
EXHIBIT B - GENERAL PLAN MAP
DESIGNATION -(LI) LIGHT INDUSTRIAL
EXHIBIT C - ZONING
DESIGNATION - (LI) LIGHT INDUSTRIAL
CASE NO. - PA01-0539
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - APRIL 24, 2002
R:q:) Pt,2.001~1-0539 Gospel Recordings\Staff Report and COAs.doc
21
CITY OF TEMECULA
SITE LAYOUT
CASE NO. - PA01-0539
EXHIBIT- D
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE- APRIL 24, 2002
SITE PLAN
R:~D P~001~01-0539 Gospel Recordings\Staff Report and COAs.doc
CITY OF TEMECULA
\
CASE NO. - PA01-0539
EXHIBIT -E
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE- APRIL 24, 2002
GRADING PLAN
R:~3 P~2001~01-0539 Gospel Recordings\Staff Report and COAs.doc
23
CITY OF TEMECULA
RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION
FRONT ELEVATION
CASE NO. - PA01-0539
EXHIBIT -F
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE- APRIL 24, 2002
BUILDING ELEVATIONS
R:~D P%2.001~01-0539 Gospel RecordingskStaff Report and COAs.doc
24
CITY OFTEMECULA
:. LLLI_ I..UJ_ I_LLI_ LLL.. I_LEI.. I.I ..
F'[RST FLOOR PLAN
~ecc~x~ FLOOr. ~
CASE NO. - PA01-0539
EXHIBIT -G
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE- APRIL 24, 2002
FLOOR PLAN
R:~D p~.001~01-0539 Gospel Recordings~Staff Repor~ and COAs.doc
CITY OF TEMECULA
PREPARED FOR:
PHONE: (215) 250-0207
FAX: (213) 250-0136
CASE NO. - PA01-0539
EXHIBIT -H
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE- APRIL 24, 2002
LANDSCAPE PLAN
R:~D p~2_001'~01-0539 Gospel Recordings\Staff Repor~ and COAs.doc
26
ITEM 8
R:\PLANCOMM~Agendas~2002\4-24-02.doc
5
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
April 24, 2002
Planning Application No. 01-0385
Prepared By: Michael McCoy, Project Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
The Community Development Department - Planning Division Staff
recommends the Planning Commission:
ADOPT a Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. 01-0385 pursuant to
Section 15332 of the California Environmental Quality Act;
2. ADOPT a Resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2002-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 01-0385,
DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT, ESTABLISH AND OPERATE
TWO MULTI-TENANT INDUSTRIAL/~VAREHOUSE SPECULATIVE
BUILDINGS, ONE OF 19,400 SQ. FT. AND ONE OF 23,700 SQ. FT. ON A
3.25-ACRE VACANT PARCEL LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF
WINCHESTER ROAD AT THE TERMINUS OF COLT COURT AND WEST
OF DIAZ ROAD KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NOS. 909-360-025 &
O42
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
Temecula Padners, LLC
REPRESENTATIVE:
Frederick Robert Associates
PROPOSAL:
A proposal to design, construct and operate two tilt-up
concrete industrial/warehouse multi-tenant speculative
buildings on a 3.25- acre vacant parcel. One building is
proposed at 19,400 square feet and one is proposed at
23,700 square feet.
LOCATION:
Located on Winchester Road at Colt Court, west of Diaz
Road.
EXISTING ZONING:
Light Industrial (LI)
R:~D P~001\01-0385 Temecula Partners LLC Ind. Bldg\FINAL PC STAFFRPT-EAST PARCELdoc
SURROUNDING ZONING:
North: Light Industrial (LI)
South: Light Industrial (LI)
East: Light Industrial(LI)
West: Light Industrial (LI)
GENERAL PLAN
DESIGNATION:
Business Park (BP)
EXISTING LAND USE:
Vacant
SURROUNDING LAND USES:
North: Industrial/Office building
South: Vacant
East: Vacant
West: Industrial/Office building
PROJECT STATISTICS (DEVELOPMENT PLAN)
Lot area (gross):
131,146-sq. ft. (3.01 acres)
Building square footage:
Building A: 23,712 square feet
Building B: 19,400 square feet
Building height: 25'
Landscaped area:
35,702 square feet (27%)
Parking required:
98 vehicle spaces
Parking provided:
100 vehicle spaces (and including 6 disabled spaces, 2
class II bicycle racks and 6 motorcycle spaces)
Lot coverage: 30%
Target Floor Area Ratio:
0.40
BACKGROUND
The applicant submitted a Development Plan application on August 8, 2001 to construct two tilt-up
concrete industrial buildings on a 3.25-acre pamel. The application was deemed incomplete on
September 6, 2001. The applicant submitted additional materials and the application was deemed
complete and scheduled for a Development Review Committee (DRC) meeting on October 11,
2001. The applicant resubmitted exhibits on February 28, 2002 that addressed each City
Department's DRC issues.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The project site is located on the east side of Winchester Road at the terminus of Colt Court, west
of Diaz Road. Building "A," is a 23,700 sq. ft. multi-tenant industrial building located horizontally in
the front of the 3.25-acre lot facing Winchester Road. Building "B," is a 19,400 sq. ft. multi-tenant
industrial building located horizontally in the rear of the project site directly behind Building "B." A
thirty-six foot wide one-way internal driveway to accommodate truck deliveries runs between the
rears of both buildings. A thirty-foot wide stamped concrete driveway and a four foot wide disabled
access pedestrian walkway off the public sidewalk on Winchester Road provide access into the
R:~D P~001~1-0385 Temecula Partners LLC Ind. BIdg\FINAL PC STAFFRPT*EAST PARCEL.dec
2
site. A twenty-four foot wide concrete driveway encircles the two buildings and returns to the single
driveway entrance fronting Building "A." An outdoor employee patio area with scored paving and a
concrete seating wall is located in the rear corner of the project site behind Building "B."
The two industrial buildings will be designed as single story tilt-up concrete multi-tenant suites.
Building "A" will feature six 5-foot deep vertical off-sets approximately every fifty lineal feet across
the building frontage to stagger the wall plane of each tenant entrance. The two center tenant
suites will have a raised parapet wall to provide greater variation to the horizontal roofline. The
sides of the building will have vertical wall offsets every fifty feet. Raised flat metal canopies
supported by encased wires are placed above the entrance of each tenant suite. Building "B' will
have six tenant suites with recessed entrances evenly spaced approximately 25-feet facing north
along the building's length. The parapet wall is 25-feet high around the building's perimeter and
walls are at a single plane around the entire building, which should not be visible from a public
right-of-way. Both buildings feature evenly spaced diamond-shaped recessed ceramic tile
ornaments across their fronts and sides. Both buildings have 10-ft. x 14-ft. roll-up loading doors in
the rear of each tenant suite completely hidden from public view within the internal driveway.
The project landscape design offers a complete palette of perimeter and foundation plantings
around both buildings. A 20-foot wide bermed landscaped planter with assorted trees, shrubs, and
groundcover effectively screens the front parking area off Winchester Road. Two 36-inch box
Chinese Flame trees flank the main driveway entrance and four more are placed at the front
corners of each building to provide accent statements. 24-inch box African Sumac trees accent
. every parking lot finger planter around the outer driveway. The tenant suites each have a generous
mixture of accent trees, shrubs and groundcover, including 24-inch box evergreen Juniper and
Fern Pine trees to soften the front and side building wall mass.
ANALYSIS
Site Desiqn, Access and Circulation
The project site design, access, circulation and building setbacks conform to all of the development
code regulations and performance standards of the Light Industrial (LI) zoning district. The Fire
Prevention Bureau has reviewed and approved this site plan regarding all fire safety access and
circulation requirements. The project is below the maximum lot coverage of 40% and target Floor
Area Ratio of .40 for the LI zone.
The parking lot layout is functional and accessible to all entry points of both buildings. A 10-ft. wide
striped area along the rear length of each building will facilitate truck unloading behind each tenant
suite. This loading and unloading zone will be completely hidden from the public right-of-way. The
striped loading areas will leave 16-ft. of clear aisle width for vehicle circulation. Development Code
Table 17.24.050 requires a 20-ft. minimum clearance between vehicles for a two-way driveway and
a 15-foot minimum clearance for a one-way driveway. The project will be conditioned (Condition of
Approval no. 13) to maintain a one-way direction with proper signage and striping posted to ensure
compliance. The project will also be conditioned to prohibit extended parking of vehicles and
storage of any kind within this internal driveway (Condition of Approval no. 14 and 15).
Buildina Desian
Both Building "A" and Building "B" are consistent with the design standards and policies of the
De~'elopment Code Performance Standards and Industrial Design Guidelines in terms of
compatibility with surrounding development, exterior relief, articulation, materials and color.
Building "A's" exterior relief, its metal canopies, and its raised center parapet provide visual interest
across the front fa(;ade. Building "A" effectively uses contrasting vertical and horizontal elements to
R:'~D P~001\01-0385 Temecula Padners LLC Ind. B[dg\FINAL PC STAFFRPT-EAST PARCEL.doc
3
break up the visual mass of the front and side wall planes into smaller areas, as recommended by
the Commercial and Industrial Performance Standards.
Although Building "B" doesn't provide the same level of vertical relief as Building "A", its design
meets the minimum Architectural Design Performance Standards and Industrial Design Guidelines
objectives, given its screened location behind Building "A" and its extensive setback distance from
the rear property line. The extended front wall plane of Building "B" is effectively broken up every
twenty-five lineal feet by recessed tenant entrances and evergreen trees. The diamond-shaped
ceramic tile accent elements and appealing earth-tone color palette on each building give both
buildings added design character and articulation.
Landscape Desian
The project landscape design' conforms to the minimum landscape requirements of the
Development Code and the Industrial Design Guidelines objectives. The landscape plan meets the
Industrial Design Guideline objectives by using larger accent trees and shrubs to help define its
driveway entrance and define the front corners of both buildings. The raised landscaped berm, with
the existing and proposed street trees, enhances the project site frontage and effectively screens
the parking lot from the public right-of-way.. The proposed landscaping also makes good use of
foundation plantings and evergreen Fern Pine and Juniper trees across the front and sides of both
buildings. The evergreen trees soften the vertical wall mass and complement the building design.
Landscaped planters containing accent palms, shrubs and groundcover create an appealing entry
statement into the tenant suites and complement the two building frontages.
The landscaping also provides an effective buffer area between the adjacent properties, with a
good complement of slope trees, shrubs and groundcover. The landscape coverage of 27%
exceeds the 20% minimum coverage requirements of the Development Code. The parking lot has
a total of 32 shade trees, which are planted within the parking lot planter fingers and parking lot
perimeter. The total number of parking lot trees exceeds the amount required for the number of
parking stalls provided. The species and distribution of landscaping material meets the
requirements and recommendations of the City's consulting Landscape Architect.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
The project is exempt from environmental review based on Section 15332 (In-Fill Development
Projects) of the California Environmental Quality Act and there are no potentially significant
environmental constraints on the site. The project qualifies for a Class 32 infill development
exemption because the project is consistent with the General Plan designation and zoning
regulations; is located on a site within the city limits, which is served by all utilities; and is less than
5 acres in area.
GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING CONSISTENCY
The proposed project is consistent with the Business Park (BP) General Plan land use designation
goals and objectives and with the Light Industrial (LI) zoning district development standards.
SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS
Staff has determined that the proposed project is consistent with the City's Design Guidelines and
conforms to all of the applicable development regulations. Staff recommends approval of the
Development Plan with the attached conditions of approval.
R:~D P',2001~01-0385 Temecula Partners LLC Ind. Bldg~FINAL PC STAFFRPT-EAST PARCELdoc
4
FINDINGS
Development Plan (Section 17.05.01 OF)
The proposal is consistent with the land use designation and policies reflected for Business
Park (BP) development in the City of Temecula General Plan, as well as the development
standards for Light Industrial (LI) in the City of Temecula Development Code. The proposed
project properly balances aesthetic design qualities with functional development, to achieve
one of the primary purposes of the Development Code Commercial and Industrial
Performance Standards. The site is therefore properly planned and zoned and found to be
physically suitable for the type and density of industrial development proposed. The project
as conditioned is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law a'nd local
ordinance, including the Califomia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City Wide Design
Guidelines, and fire and building codes.
The overall design of the project, including the site, building, parking, circulation and other
associated site improvements, is consistent with and intended to protect the health and
safety of those working in and around the site. The project has been reviewed for, and as
conditioned, has been found to be consistent with, all applicable policies, guidelines,
standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and
function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety and welfare. The Fire
Department staff has also found that the site design will provide adequate emergency
access in the case of a need for emergency response to the site.
Attachments:
1. PC Resolution No. - 02- - Blue Page 6
Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 9
Exhibits - Blue Page 20
A. Vicinity Map
B. Zoning Map
C. General Plan Map
D. Site Plan
E. Elevation Plan
F. Floor Plan
G. Landscape Plan
H. Grading Plan
R:',D P~001~01-0385 Temecula Partners LLC Ind. Bldg'~FINAL PC STAFFRPT-EAST PARCEL.doc
5
ATI'ACHMENT NO. 1
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2002-
R:\D P~2001~01-0385 Temecula Partners LLC Ind. Bldg\FINAL PC STAFFRPT-EAST PARCEL.doc
6
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2002-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 01-0385,
DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT, ESTABLISH AND OPERATE
TWO MULTI-TENANT INDUSTRIAL/WAREHOUSE SPECULATIVE
BUILDINGS, ONE OF 19,400 SQ. FT. AND ONE OF 23,700 SQ. FT., ON A
3.25-ACRE VACANT PARCEL LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF
WINCHESTER ROAD AT TERMINUS OF COLT COURT AND WEST OF
DIAZ ROAD KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NOS. 909-360-025 & 042
WHEREAS, Temecula Partners, LLC, filed Planning Application No. PA01-0385
(Development Plan Application), in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and
Development Code;
WHEREAS, the Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in
the time and manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application on
April 24, 2002, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and
interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this
matter;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the
testimony, the Commission recommended approval of the Application subject to and based upon
the findings set forth hereunder;
WHEREAS, all legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CiTY OF TEMECULA
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1.
by reference.
That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated
Section 2. Findinqs. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby
makes the following findings as required by Section 176.05.010F of the Temecula Municipal Code:
The proposal is consistent with the land use designation and policies reflected for Business
Park (BP) development in the City of Temecula General Plan, as well as the development
standards for Light Industrial (LI) in the City of Temecula Development Code. The
proposed project properly balances aesthetic design qualities with functional development,
to achieve one of the primary purposes of the Development Code Commercial and
Industrial Performance Standards. The site is therefore properly planned and zoned and
found to be physically suitable for the type and density of industrial development proposed.
The project as conditioned is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State
law and local ordinance, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City
Wide'Design Guidelines, and fire and building codes.
2. The overall design of the project, including the site, building, parking, circulation and other
associated site improvements, is consistent with and intended to protect the health and
safety of those working in and around the site. The project has been reviewed for, and as
conditioned, has been found to be consistent with, all applicable policies, guidelines,
R:'tD P~2001\01-0385 Temecula Padners LLC Ind. Bldg\FINAL PC STAFFRPT-EAST PARCELdoc 7
standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and
function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety and welfare. The Fire
Department staff has also found that the site design will provide adequate emergency
access in the case of a need for emergency response to the site.
Section3. Environmental Compliance. The project will have no significant
environmental impacts and has been found to be categorically exempt, Pursuant to Section 15332
class 32 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines.
Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby
conditionally approves the Application, a request to develop two multi-tenant warehouse/industrial
speculative buildings, one of 19,400 square feet and one of 23,700 square feet, as set forth on
Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference together with any and all
necessary conditions that may be deemed necessary.
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning
Commission this 24th day of April 2002.
A'FI'EST:
Dennis Chiniaeff, Chairperson
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do herebycertifythat
PC Resolution No. 02- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 24th day of April, 2002, by the following vote of
the Commission:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
R:~) P~2001~01-0385 Temecuta Partners LLC Ind. Bldg~FINAL PC STAFFRPT-EAST PARCEL,doc
8
A'FI'ACHMENT NO. 2
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
R:~D P~2001~1-0385 Temecula Partners LLC {nd. BIdg~FINAL PC STAFFRPT-EAST PARCEL.doc
9
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OFAPPROVAL
Planning Application No.:
PA01-0385 Development Plan
Project Description:
Planning Application to construct, establish
and operate warehouse/industrial speculative
building a 19,400 sq. ft. and a 23,700 sq. ft. on
3.25 acres of vacant land
DIF Category:
Business Park/Industrial
Assessor's Parcel Nos:
909-360-025 and 042
Approval Date:
April 24, 2002
Expiration Date:
April 24, 2004
PLANNING DIVISION
Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project
1. The applicant shall deliver to the Community Development Department - Planning Division
a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty-
Four Dollars ($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice
of Exemption required under Public Resoumes Code Section 21108(b) and California Code
of Regulations Section 15075. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant has
not delivered to the Community Development Department - Planning Division the check as
required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of
condition [Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)].
.General Requirements
2. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to
indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend with Legal Counsel of the City's own
selection, the City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or
instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees,
consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents from any and all claims, actions,
awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, void, annul, seek
monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the
approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal
board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning
the Planning Application.
3. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or
proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the
defense of the action. The City reserves its right to take any and all action the City deems
to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense.
4. All conditions shall be complied with prior to any occupancy or use allowed by this
Development Plan.
R:~J3 P~2001~01-0385 Temecula Partners LLC Ind, Bldg~FiNAL PC STAFFRPT-EAST PARCEL.doc
10
The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of
this development plan.
This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall
become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction
contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period, which is thereafter diligently
pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this
approval.
The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibits "D"
(Site Plan), "E" (Building Elevation), "F" (Floor Plan), "G" (Landscape Plan), "H" (Grading
Plan) and "1" (Color and Material Board) contained on file with the Community Development
Department - Planning Division.
Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable
satisfaction of the Planning Director. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being
maintained, the Planning Director shall have the authority to require the property owner to
bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued
maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any
successors in interest.
All mechanical and roof equipment shall be fully screened from public view by being placed
below the lowest level of the surrounding parapet wall.
All Downspouts shall be internalized.
The colors and materials for the project shall substantially conform to those noted directly
below and with Exhibit "1" (Color and Material Board), or as supemeded by these conditions,
contained on file with the Community Development Department - Planning Division.
Primary concrete exterior wall color:
Secondary concrete exterior wall color:
Metal canopy color:
Ceramic rite walt accent:
Window and door glazing:
Window and door framing system:
Metal loading doors:
Vista #80 "Oat Cake"
Vista #82 "River Rock"
Vista #168 "Cocoa Bean"
Vista #168 "Cocoa Bean"
Viracon Solarscreen #VS 5-14 blue glass
Mill Finish Anodized Aluminum
Vista #82 "River Rock"
12. The construction landscape drawings shall indicate coordination and grouping of all utilities,
which are to be screened from view per applicable City Codes and guidelines.
13. The internal driveway between the two buildings' loading zones shall be clearly indicated as
a one-way direction with arrows painted on the asphalt driveway and visible signage.
14. The ten-foot wide striped loading zones along the rear of each building shall have clearly
marked signage near each tenant loading door indicating temporary parking only for loading
and unloading purposes.
15. No outdoor storage of any materials shall be permitted within the one-way internal driveway
or the outer circulation driveway around the outside of the two buildings.
Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits
16. The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be provided
by the Community Development Department - Planning Division staff, and return one
signed set to the Community Development Department - Planning Division for their files.
17. The applicant shall submit to the Community Development Department - Planning Division
for permanent filing two (2) 8" X 10" glossy photographic color prints of the approved Color
and Materials Board of approved Exhibit "1", to the Community Development Department -
R:~D P~2001~01-0385 Ternecula Partners LLC Ind. Bldg~FINAL PC STAFFRPT-EAST PARCEL.doc 11
Planning Division for their files. All labels on the Color and Materials Board and Elevations
shall be readable on the photographic prints.
18. The applicant shall submit a parking lot lighting plan to the Planning Department, which
meets the requirements of the Development Code and the Palomar Lighting Ordinance.
The parking lot light standards shall be placed in such a way as to not adversely impact the
growth potential of the parking lot trees.
19. A copy of the Grading Plan shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Department.
20. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal
Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that Ordinance or by
providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid.
21. If cultural resources are found on the project site, all grading activity shall cease and the
site'shall be reviewed by an archeologist for cultural resource and archeological impacts.
Prior to Issuance of Building Permit
22. A Consistency Check fee shall be paid per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule.
23. Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and
· approved by the Community Development Department - Planning Division. These plans
shall conform substantially with the approved Exhibit "G", or as amended by these
conditions. The location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be
shown. The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The cover page
shall identify the total square footage of the landscaped area for the site.. The plans shall
be accompanied by the following items:
a. Appropriate filing fee (per the City Of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal).
b. One (1) copy of the approved grading plan.
c. Water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water
Efficient Ordinance).
d. Total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with the approved
plan).
24. A reciprocal access agreement shall be established in the property title to provide for
common access between this property and the adjacent pamel to the west.
25. The applicant shall submit to the Planning Department, details of the employee patio area,
to include type of furniture and amenities to be installed.
28. The design of all decorative concrete paving, including color and finish, shall be shown on
the construction plans and approved by the Planning Department.
27. The applicant shall submit details of the employee patio area to include type of furniture and
hardscape material to be installed.
28. A multi-tenant sign program shall be submitted with the appropriate fee, in conformance
with City Ordinances, Design Guidelines, and Development Code for review and approval
by the Planning Department.
Prior to Building Occupancy
29. The property owner shall fully install all required landscaping and irrigation, and submit a
landscape maintenance bond in a form and amount approved by the Planning Department
for a period of one-year from the date of the first occupancy permit.
30. The construction plans shall indicate the application of painted rooftop addressing plotted
on a 9-inch grid pattern with 45-inch tall numerals spaced 9-inch apart. The numerals shall
R:~D P~2001~01-0385 Temecula Partners LLC Ind. Bldg\FINAL PC STAPFRPT-EAST PARCELdoc 12
31.
be painted with a standard 9-inch paint roller using fluorescent yellow paint applied over a
contrasting background. The address shall be oriented to the street and placed as closely
as possible to the edge of the building closest to the street.
If the project is built in phases, the applicant shall hydroseed the undeveloped building pad
until construction of that building occurs.
BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT
32.
All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 1998 edition of the
California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 1998 National Electrical Code;
California Administrative Code, ,Title 24 Energy and Disabled Access Regulations and the
Temecula Municipal Code.
33.
Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plans showing compliance
with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All street lights and other
outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building
and Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly
upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way.
34.
A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted to
the Building & Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School
Mitigation Fees.
35.
Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction
work.
36. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review.
37.
Disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building is required. The
path of travel shall meet the California Disabled Access Regulations in terms of cross
slope, travel slope stripping and signage. Provide all details on plans. (California Disabled
Access Regulations effective April 1,1998)
38.
All building and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations. Provide
all details on plans. (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1, 1998)
39. Provide van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entry.
40. Show path of accessibility from parking to furthest point of improvement.
41.
Provide house electrical meter provisions for power for the operation of exterior lighting, fire
alarm systems.
42.
Restroom fixtures, number and type, to be in accordance with the provisions of the 1998
edition of the California Building Code Appendix 29. Obtain the Division of the State
Architect recommendation for the accessible restroom dimensions for toddlers from the
Building Official, to implement in the building design.
43. Provide an approved automatic fire sprinkler system.
44.
Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans prior
to permit issuance.
R:~E) P~2001\01-O385 Ternecul& Partners LLC Ind. Bldg\FINAL PC STAFFRPT-EAST PARCEL.doc
13
45. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic
and mechanical plan for plan review.
46.
Truss calculations that are stamped by the engineer of record and the truss manufacturer
engineer are required for plan review submittal.
47. Provide precise grading plan for plan check submittal to check for handicap accessibility.
48.
A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the
building construction.
49.
Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standard and any block walls if not on the appioved
building plans, will require separate approvals and permits.
50. Show all building setbacks.
51.
Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrance to the project that indicates the
hours of construction, shown below, as allowed by the City of Temecula Ordinance No. 0-
90-04, specifically Section G (1) of Riverside County Ordinance No. 457.73, for any site
within one-quarter mile of an occupied residence.
Monday-Friday 6:30 a.m. - 6:30 p.m.
Saturday 7:00 a.m. - 6:30 p.m.
No work is permitted on Sunday or Government Holidays
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
52. Unless otherwise noted, all conditions shall be completed by the Developer at no cost to
any Government Agency. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the site
plan all existing and proposed property lines, easements, traveled ways, improvement
constraints and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be
resubmitted for further review and revision.
General Requirements
53. A Grading Permit for either rough and/or precise grading, including all on-site flat work and
improvements, shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement ef any construction outside of the City-maintained street right-of-way.
54. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way.
55. All improvement plans and grading plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent
projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on
standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars.
Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit
56. A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed and
approved by the Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include all necessary
erosion control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and private
property.
57. ~l'he Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading
and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and
subject to approval by the Department of Public Works.
R:'~D P~2001\01-0385 Temecula Partners LLC Ind. Bldg\FINAL PC STAFFRPT-EAST PARCEL,doc
14
58. A Soil Report shall be prepared by a registered Soil or Civil Engineer and submitted to the
Director of the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report
shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the
construction of engineered structures and p, avement sections.
59. A Geological Report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted to
the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall
address-special study zones and the geological conditions of the site, and shall provide
recommendations to mitigate the impact of ground shaking and liquefaction.
The Developer shall have a Drainage Study prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in
accordance with City Standards identifying storm water runoff expected from this site and
upstream of this site. The study shall identify all existing or proposed public or private
drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. The study shall also analyze and
identify impacts to downstream properties and provide specific recommendations to protect
the properties and mitigate any impacts. Any upgrading or upsizing of downstream
facilities, including acquisition of drainage or access easements necessary to make
required improvements, shall be provided by the Developer.
The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No
grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or the
project is shown to be exempt.
As deemed necessary by the Director of the Department of Public Works, the Developer
shall receive written clearance from the following agencies:
a. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
b. Planning Department
c. Department of Public Works
d. Southern California Edison
e. Verizon
631 The Developer shall comply with all constraints, which may be shown upon an
Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the
subject property.
Permanent landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department
and the Department of Public Works for review and approval.
The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or slope easements for off-site
work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public Works.
A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by either cashier's check
or money order, prior to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area drainage plan
fee. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been credited to this
property, no new charge needs to be paid.
Prior to Issuance of a Building Permit
67. A Parcel Merger to combine Parcel 25 and Parcel A of amended LLA#98-0119 shall be
processed.
68. Improvement plans and/or precise grading plans shali conform to applicable City of
Temecula Standards subject to approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works.
The following design criteria shall be observed:
60.
61.
62.
64.
65.
66.
R:'~D P~2001~01 ~)385 Temecula Partners LLC Ind. Bldg\FINAL PC STAFFRPT-EAST PARCELdoc
15
a. Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum Over A.C.
paving.
b. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula standard No. 207A.
c. All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees.
d. Landscaping sh.~all be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and
adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility.
e. All concentrated drainage directed towards the public street shall be conveyed
through undersidewalk drains.
69. The Developer shall construct the following public improvements in conformance with
applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Director of the Department of
Public Works.
a. Street improvements, which may include, but not limited to: drive approaches
70. The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance
with the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered Civil Engineer, and the Soil
Engineer shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions.
71. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as
required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all
Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06.
72. The Developer shall record a written offer to participate in, and waive all rights to object to
the formation of an Assessment District, a Community Facilities District, or a Bridge and
Major Thoroughfare Fee District for the construction of the proposed Western Bypass
Corridor in accordance with the General Plan. The form of the offer shall be subject to the
approval of the City Engineer and City Attorney.
Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy
73. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
a. Rancho California Water District
b. Eastern Municipal Water District
c. Department of Public Works
74. All public improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and
City standards to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works.
75. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall
be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of
Public Works.
FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
76. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by
the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the
California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in
force at the time of building plan submittal.
77. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or
construction of all commemial buildings per CFC Appendix III.A, Table A-Ill-A-1. The
developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 2125 GPM at
20 PSI residual operating pressure, plus an assumed sprinkler demand of 1850 G PM for a
R:\D P~001\0t-0385 Temecula Partners LLC Ind. Bldg'~FINAL PC STAFFRPT-EAST PARCEL.doc 16
total fire flow of 3975 GPM with a 4 hour duration. The required fire flow may be adjusted
during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or ~_utomatic
fire protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire Flow as
given above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC 903.2, Appendix Ill-A)
78. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC
Appendix Ill-B, Table A-III-B-1. A minimum of 5 hydrants, in a combination of on-site and
off-site (6" x 4" x 2-2 1/2" outlets) shall be located on Fire Department access roads and
adjacent public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 300 feet apart, at each intersection and
shall be located no more than 180 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department
access nad(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fin flow shall be available from any
adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required.
(CFC 903.2,903.4.2, and Appendix Ill-B)
79. As required by the California Fire Code, when any portion of the facility is in excess of 150
feet from a water supply on a public street, as measured by an approved route around the
exterior of the facility, on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire
flow shall be provided. For this project on site fire hydrants are required. (CFC 903.2)
80. Maximum cul-de-sac length shall not exceed 1320 feet. Minimum turning radius on any cul-
de-sac shall be forty-five (45) feet. (CFC 902.2.2.2.3 and Subdivision Ord 16.03.020)
81. If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection
prior to any building construction. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2;2)
82. Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have
approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent roads
are installed. Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface for
80,000 lbs. GVVV. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2)
83. Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved Fire
Department vehicle access marls to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or any
portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be an all
weather surface designed for 80,000 lbs. GVW with a minimum AC thickness of .25 feet. (
CFC sec 902)
84. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than
twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13)
feet six (6)inches. (CFC 902.2.2.1)
85. The gradient for a fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed fifteen (15) pement. (CFC
902.2.2.6 Ord. 99-14)
86. Prior to building construction, dead end nad ways and streets in excess of one hundred
and fifty (150) feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of
accommodating fire apparatus. (CFC 902.2.2.4)
87. Prior to building construction, this development shall have two (2) points of access, via all-
weather surface roads, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 902.2.1 )
88. Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water
system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall be
signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature
block; and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards.
After the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be presented to
the Fire Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system including fire
hydrants shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any
combustible building materials being placed on an individual lot. (CFC 8704.3, 901.2.2.2
and National Fire Protection Association 24 1-4.1)
R:\D P~001~01-0385 Temecula Pariners LLC Ind. Bldg\FINAL PC STAFFRPT-EAST PARCI~L.doc 17
89. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective Markers"
shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations. (CFC 901.4.3)
90. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, approved numbers or
addresses shall be provided on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be
plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the properly. Numbers shall be of
a contrasting color to their background. Commemial, multi-family residential and industrial
buildings shall have a minimum twelve (12) inches numbers with suite numbers a minimum
of six (6) inches in size. All suites shall gave a mir~imum of six (6) inch high letters and/or
numbers on both the front and rear doors. Single family residences and multi-family
residential units shall have four (4) inch letters and/or numbers, as approved by the Fire
Prevention Bureau. (CFC 901.4.4)
91. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on square footage and
type of construction, occupancy or use, the developer shall install a fire sprinkler system.
Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to
installation. (CFC Article 10, CBC Chapter 9)
92. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on a requirement for
monitoring the sprinkler system, occupancy or use, the developer shall install an fire alarm
system monitored by an approved Underwriters Laboratory listed central station. Plans
shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. (CFC
Article 10)
93. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a "Knox-Box" shall be
provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six (6) feet in height and be
located to the right side of the main entrance door. (CFC 902.4)
94. All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates
obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry
system for emergency access by fire fighting personnel. (CFC 902.4)'
95. Prior to final inspection of any building, the applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire
Department for approval, a site plan designating Fire Lanes with appropriate lane painting
and or signs.
96. Prior to the building final, speculative buildings capable of housing high-piled combustible
stock, shall be designed with the following fire protection and life safety features: an
automatic fire sprinkler system(s) designed for a specific commodity class and storage
arrangement, hose stations, alarm systems, smoke vents, draft curtains, Fire Department
access doors and Fire department access roads. Buildings housing high-piled combustible
stock shall comply with the provisions California Fire Code Article 81 and all applicable
National Fire Protection Association standards. (CFC Article 81 )
97. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, the developer/applicant
shall be responsible for obtaining underground and/or aboveground tank permits for the
storage of combustible liquids, flammable liquids or any other hazardous materials from
both the County Health department and Fire Prevention Bureau.(CFC 7901.3 and 8001.3)
Special Conditions
)
98. Prior to building permit issuance, a full technical report may be required to be submitted and
to the Fire Prevention Bureau. This report shall address, but not be limited to, all fire and life
safety measures per 1998 CFC, 1998 CBC, NFPA- 13, 24, 72 and 231-C.
99.
Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final a simple plot plan and a
simple floor plan, each as an electronic file of the .DWG format must be submitted to the
R:~D P~001~01-0385 Temecula Partners LLC Ind. Bldg\FiNAL PC STAFFRPT-EAST PARCEL.doc
18
Fire Prevention Bureau. Alternative file formats may be acceptable, contact fire prevention
for approval.
100. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Fire Code permit process and
update any changes in the items and quantities approved as part of their Fire Code permit.
These changes shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for review and approval
per the Fire Code and is subject to inspection. (CFC 105)
101. The applicant shall submit for review and approval by the Riverside County Department
of Environmental Health and City Fire Department an update to the Hazardous Material
Inventory Statement and Fire Department Technical Report on file at the city; should any
quantities used or stored onsite increase or should changes to operation introduce any
additional hazardous material not listed in existing reports. (CFC Appendix II-E)
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTEMENT
102. All perimeter landscaping and parkways shall be maintained by the property owner or
private maintenance association.
103. The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of
construction debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul construction debris.
104. If additional street lights are to be installed, the developer shall file an application with the
Community Services District (CSD) and pay the appropriate energy fees related to the
transfer of said streetlights into the CSD maintenance program, prior to the issuance of
building permits or installation of streetlights, whichever comes first.
Applicant Signature
Date
Applicant Printed Name
R:~D P~2001\01-0385 Temecula Partners LLC Ind. Bldg\FINAL PC STAFFRPT-EAST PARCEL.doc
19
A'I-rACHMENT NO. 3
EXHIBITS
R:\D P~2001\01-0385 Temecula Partners LLC Ind. Bldg~FINAL PC STAFFRPT-EAST PARCELdoc
20
CITY OF TEMECULA
CASE NO. - PA01-0385
EXHIBIT - A
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - APRIL 24, 2002
VICINITY MAP
R:~D P~001\01-0385 Temecula Partners LLC Ind. Bldg\FINAL PC STAFFRPT-EAST PARCEL.doc
21
CITY OF TEMECULA
EXHIBIT B - ZONING MAP
DESIGNATION - LI (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL)
EXHIBIT C - GENERAL PLAN
DESIGNATION - BP (BUSINESS PARK)
CASE NO. - PA01-0385
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - APRIL 24, 2002
R:~D P~2001~01~385 Temecula Par~ners LLC Ind. BIdg~FINAL PC STAFFRPT-EAST PARCEL.doc
22
CITY OF TEMECULA
CASE NO. - PA01-0385
EXHIBIT- D
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - APRIL 24, 2002
SITE PLAN
R:~D P~2001~01-0385 Temecula Partners LLC Ind. Bldg~FINAL PC STAFFRPT-EAST PARCEL.doc
23
CITY OF TEMECULA
BUILDING A - CONCEPTUAL ELEVATIONS
CASE NO. - PA01-0385
EXHIBIT - E
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - APRIL 24, 2002
ELEVATION PLAN
R:~D P',2.001',D1-0385 Temecu[a Partners LLC Ind. Bldg\FINAL PC STAFFRPT-EAST PARCELdoc
24
CITY OF TEMECULA
zrf q II ,in I -i ~ I i ,i-. 'in I
BUILDING B - CONCEPTUAL ELEVATIONS
CASE NO. - PA01-0385
EXHIBIT- E
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - APRIL 24, 2002
ELEVATION PLAN NO. 2
R:~D P~2001~01-0385 Temecula Padners LLC Ind. Bldg~FINAL PC STAFFRPT-EAST PARCEL.doc
25
CITY OFTEMECULA
CASE NO. - PA01-0385
EXHIBIT - F FLOOR PLAN
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - APRIL 24, 2002
R:~D P~001~01-0385 Temecuta Partakers LLC Ind. Bldg'~FINAL PC STAFFRPT-EAST PARCEL,doc
25
CITY OF TEMECULA
Winchester Ro=d .... · ....
CASE NO. - PA01-0385
EXHIBIT - G
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - APRIL 24, 2002
LANDSCAPE PLAN
R:\D P~001\01-0385 Temecula Partners LLC Ind. B[dg\FINAL PC STAFFRPT-EAST PARCEL.doc
26
CITY OF TEMECULA
CASE NO. - PA01-0385
EXHIBIT - H
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - APRIL 24, 2002
GRADING PLAN
R:~) P~001~01-0385 Temecula Partners LLC Ind. Bldg~FINAL PC STAFFRPT-EAST PARCEL.doc
28
ITEM 9
R:\PLANCOMM~Agendas~002\4-24-02.doc
5
RECOMMENDATION:
1.
2.
STAFF REPORT- PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
April 24, 2002
Planning Application No. 01-0386 (Development Plan)
Prepared By: Michael McCoy, Project Planner
The Community Development Department - Planning Division Staff
recommends the Planning Commission:
ADOPT a Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. 01-0386 pursuant to
Section 15332 of the California Environmental Quality Act;
ADOPT a Resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2002-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 01-0386,
DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT, ESTABLISH AND OPERATE A
33,226 SQUARE FOOT INDUSTRIAL/WAREHOUSE BUILDING ON A 1.91
ACRE VACANT PARCEL LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF
WINCHESTER ROAD AT THE TERMINUS OF BOSTIK COURT AND
WEST OF DIAZ ROAD KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 909-360-
041.
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
REPRESENTATIVE:
PROPOSAL:
LOCATION:
EXISTING ZONING:
SURROUNDING ZONING:
Temecuia Partners, LLC
Frederick Robert Associates
A proposal to design, construct and operate a 33,226 square
foot tilt-up concrete industrial/warehouse speculative
building.
Located on Winchester Road at Bostik Court, west of Diaz
Road.
Light Industrial (LI)
North: Light Industrial (LI)
South: Light Industrial (LI)
East: Light Industrial (LI)
West: Light Industrial (LI)
R:~D P~001\01-0386 Temecula Partners industrial Spec Bldg\FINAL PC STAFFRPT.doc
GENERAL PLAN
DESIGNATION:
Business Park (BP)
EXISTING LAND USE:
Vacant
SURROUNDING LAND USES:
North: Industrial/Office building
South: Vacant
East: Vacant
West: Industrial/Office building
PROJECT STATISTICS (DEVELOPMENT PLAN)
Lot area (gross):
83,200-sq. ft. (1.91 acres)
Building square footage:
33,226 square feet
Building height: 33'-6"
Landscaped area:
16,941 square feet (20%)
Parking required:
61 standard vehicle spaces
Parking provided:
62 standard vehicle spaces (and including 4 disabled
spaces, 2 class II bicycle racks and 3 motorcycle spaces)
Lot coverage: 40 %
Target Floor Area Ratio:
0.40
BACKGROUND
The applicant submitted a Development Plan application on August 8, 2001. The application was
deemed incomplete on September 6, 2001. The applicant submitted additional materials and the
application was deemed complete and scheduled for a Development Review Committee (DRC)
meeting on October 11,2001.
In January 2002, the applicant met with Planning Staff to discuss the architecture design DRC
comments prior to resubmitting revised exhibits. The applicant resubmitted exhibits on February 28,
2002 that addressed each City Department's DRC issues.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The project site is located on the east side of Winchester Road opposite the terminus of Bostik
Court and west of Diaz Road. Each side of the building has a thirty-foot wide stamped concrete
driveway off of Winchester Road. A twenty-four foot wide two-way aisle provides circulation around
the building's perimeter. Cross-lot access will be provided at the rear of the site. Employee and
customer parking stalls are located on the east and west sides of the site, as well as the rear of the
building. Two 12 -ft. wide by 60-ft. long truck-loading ramps are provided at both rear corners of the
building and screened from the public right-of-way. A 200-sq. ff. employee break area with
decorative paving, tables and benches is provided against the rear east side of the building
between adjacent to a landscape planter.
R:~D P~O01~01-0386 Temecula Partners Industrial Spec Bldg\FINAL PC STAFFRPT.doc
2
The proposed 175-ft. wide by 200-ft. deep tilt-up concrete building will be sited in the center of the
1.9-acre property. The front elevation will feature four evenly spaced 17-foot high vertical exterior
pilasters that project from the wall surface. Raised spandrel blue glass elements are cornerstone
entrance features that wrap around each side of the building and extend 31/2 feet above the parapet
roofiine. The glass elements have anodized aluminum framing with a horizontal metal canopy
across the center. These two corner elements wrap around each side of the building to the two side
entrances and are a mirror image of the front glass end sections. Each side elevation has two
additional 12-inch deep vertical pilasters with three 13-foot deep building offsets along each side
elevation every forty, to fifty lineal feet of wall surface. The exterior color palette is based on three
shades of blue. Two horizontal reveal lines wrap around the upper and midsections of the building
to provide additional relief of the building's wall mass.
Landscape planters with a variety of 5-gallon shrubs and groundcover surround the building and
parking areas. The front landscape area along Winchester Road provides a 2W2'foot high
landscaped berm with a 4:1 maximum slope with turf, groundcover and 24-inch box London Plane
trees within a 25-foot landscape setback area along the length of the front elevation. Two 36-inch
box Chinese Flame accent trees flank each of the two driveway entrances from the public street to
create a more effective entry statement. The two building entrances are flanked on each side by
two 36-inch box Purple-leaf Plum accent trees. The tree palette provides a total of 26 evergreen
parking lot trees approximately every 4 parking spaces, which includes 24-inch box Camphor trees
around the parking lot perimeter and 24-inch box African Sumac trees within the parking lot finger
planters.
ANALYSIS
Site Desiqn, Access and Circulation
The project site design, access and circulation conform to all of the Development Code Industrial
Performance Standards and the City-wide Industrial Design Guidelines. All building setbacks
exceed the minimum setback provisions of Industrial Development Standards. The site design and
accessibility help implement the Development Code provisions and Design Guideline objectives
with a well-defined circulation plan that provides convenient site and building access from both the
public right-of-way and parking lot. In addition, effective use of landscape planters separate the
building entrances and office areas from paved parking areas.
Site access and internal circulation is designed in an efficient and direct manner for safety and
functionality. The site and building entrances are effectively enhanced with decorative paving and
accent landscaping across the property frontage. The loading docks and trash enclosure are
located at the rear corners of the building out of public view and screened by architecturally
integrated features. The Fire Prevention Bureau has reviewed and approved this site plan
regarding all fire safety access and circulation requirements.
Architecture, Color and Materials
The building's design is consistent with the design standards and policies of the Development
Code Performance Standards and Industrial Design Guidelines in terms of compatibility with
surrounding development, exterior relief, articulation, and materials. The raised spandrel glass end
sections draw the view away from the flat horizontal roofline across the front facade and give
prominence to the building's primary entrances. Both side elevations have well defined vertical
offsets to create effective relief and shadowing. These design features combine to achieve the
General Performance Standards of the Development Code for quality design by using contrasting
vertical and horizontal elements that provide relief to the visual wall mass into smaller areas.
Overall, the architecture design of the building, as reviewed and conditioned, meets the intent and
R:~D P~001\01-0386 Temecula Padners Industrial Spec Bldg\FINAL PC STAFFRPT,doc
3
objectives of the Development Code Industrial Performance Standards and Industrial Design
Guidelines.
Staff has expressed its concern to the applicant that the three-toned blue color palette may appear
too bright from a distance and clash with the natural green and brown shades on the western
hillsides in the background. While meeting with the applicant, Staff has recommended that
alternative earth-tone colors replace the currant color palette. The applicant has maintained that the
blue color palette gives the building greater prominence and makes it more attractive to potential
tenants. Staff's concern for preserving the natural view of the western hillsides by requiring earth-
tone color schemes on new industrial buildings west of Diaz Road, has also been recently
expressed by the Planning Commission on more than one occasion. In addition, the Industrial
Design Guidelines recommend the use of light, neutral colors to help reduce the perceived size.
Staff has conditioned the applicant to provide an alternative earth-tone color palette subject to
review and approval by Planning Staff prior to building permit issuance under Condition of Approval
no. 23.
Landscapino
The project landscape design conforms to the minimum landscape coverage requirements of the
Development Code and the Industrial Design Guidelines objectives. The landscape plan helps to
achieve the intent of the Design Guidelines through the effective use of foundation plantings with a
variety of accent trees, shrubs and greundcover to compliment the architectural design. The use of
accent trees and shrubs around the property perimeter and the building's footprint blend in well with
the building design and provide a landscape buffer area between adjacent properties. The
conceptual landscape plan, as reviewed and conditioned, meets the landscape coverage and
planting requirements per the Development Code and objectives of the Industrial Design
Guidelines. As proposed, the landscape design will complement the architectural design. The
landscape coverage of 20 % meets the minimum 20 % coverage requirements of the Development
Code. The parking lot provides a total of 26 shade trees, including 24-inch box Camphor, African
Sumac and Fern Pine trees. The number of parking lot trees provided exceeds the 16 required
trees for the number of parking stalls. The plant species and distribution of landscape material
meets the Development Code requirements and recommendations of the City's consulting
Landscape Amhitect.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
The project is exempt from environmental review based on Section 15332 (In-Fill Development
Projects) of the California Environmental Quality Act and there are no potentially significant
environmental constraints on the site. The project qualifies for a Class 32 infill development
exemption because the project is consistent with the General Plan designation and zoning
regulations; is located on a site within the city limits, which is served by all utilities; and is less than
5 acres in area.
GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING CONSISTENCY
The proposed project is consistent with the Business Park (BP) General Plan land use designation
goals and objectives and with the Light Industrial (LI) zoning district development standards.
SUMMARY/RECOMMENDATION
Staff has determined that the proposed project is consistent with the City's Design Guidelines and
conforms to all of the applicable development regulations. Staff recommends approval of the
Development Plan with the attached conditions of approval.
R:~D P~2001~01-0386 Temecula Partners Industrial Spec Bldg~F[NAL PC'STAFFRPT.doc 4
FINDINGS
Development Plan (Section 17.05.010F)
The proposal is consistent with the land use designation and policies reflected for Business
Park (BP) development in the City of Temecula General Plan, as well as the development
standards for Light Industrial (LI) in the City of Temecula Development Code. The proposed
project provides variety and visual interest while maintaining a unified overall image, to
achieve the objectives of the Commercial and Industrial General Performance Standards.
The site is therefore properly planned and zoned and found to be physically suitable for the
type and density of industrial development proposed. The project as conditioned is also
consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local ordinance, including
the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City Wide Design Guidelines, and fire
and building codes.
The overall design of the project, including the site, building, parking, circulation and other
associated site improvements, is consistent with and intended to protect the health and
safety of those working in and around the site. The project has been reviewed for, and as
conditioned, has been found to be consistent with, all applicable policies, guidelines,
standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and
function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety and welfare. The Fire
Department staff has also found that the site design will provide adequate emergency
access in the case of a need for emergency response to the site.
Attachments:
1. PC Resolution No. - 02- - Blue Page 6
Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 9
Exhibits - Blue Page 20
A. Vicinity Map
B. Zoning Map
C. General Plan Map
D. Site Plan
E. Elevation Plan 1 & 2
F. Floor Plan
G. Landscape Plan
H. Grading Plan
R:~D P~2001\01-0386 Ternecula Partners Industrial Spec BIdg\FINAL PC STAI=FRPT.doc
5
A'I-i'ACHMENT NO. 1
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2002-
R:~D P~2001\01-0386 Temecula Partners Industrial Spec Bldg~FINAL PC STAFFRPT.doc
6
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2002-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 01-
0386, DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT, ESTABLISH AND
OPERATE A 33,226 SQUARE FOOT INDUSTRIAL/WAREHOUSE
BUILDING ON 1.91 VACANT ACRES LOCATED ON TIlE EAST
SIDE OF WINCHESTER ROAD AT THE TERMINUS OF BOSTIK
COURT AND WEST OF DIAZ ROAD KNOWN AS ASSESSORS
PARCEL NO. 909-360-041
WHEREAS, Temecula Partners, LLC, filed Planning Application No. PA01-0386
(Development Plan Application), in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and
Development Code;
WHEREAS, the Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in
the time and manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application on
April 24, 2002, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and
interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this
matter;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the
testimony, the Commission recommended approval of the Application subject to and based upon
the findings set forth hereunder;
WHEREAS, all legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1.
by reference.
That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated
Section 2. Findinqs. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby
makes the following findings as required by Section 176.05.01 OF of the Temecula Municipal Code:
The proposal is consistent with the land use designation and policies reflected for Business
Park (BP) development in the City of Temecula General Plan, as well as the development
standards for Light Industrial (LI) in the City of Temecula Development Code. The proposed
project provides variety and visual interest while maintaining a unified overall image, to
achieve the objectives of the Commercial and Industrial General Performance Standards.
The site is therefore properly planned and zoned and found to be physically suitable for the
type and density of industrial development proposed. The project as conditioned is also
consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local ordinance, including
the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City Wide Design Guidelines, and fire
and building codes.
2. The overall design of the project, including the site, building, parking, circulation and other
associated site improvements, is consistent with and intended to protect the health and
R:'tD P~001~1-0386 Temecula Partners Industrial Spec Bldg',FINAL PC STAFFRPT.doc 7
safety of those working in and around the site. The project has been reviewed for, and as
conditioned, has been found to be consistent with, all applicable policies, guidelines,
standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and
function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety and welfare. The Fire
Department staff has also found that the site design will provide adequate emergency
access in the case of a need for emergency response to the site.
Section3. Environmental Compliance. The project will have no significant
environmental impacts and has been found to be categorically exempt, Pursuant to Section 15332
class 32 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines.
Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby
conditionally approves the Application, a request to develop a 33,200 square foot
warehouse/industrial speculative building set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated
herein by this reference together with any and all necessary conditions that may be deemed
necessary.
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning
Commission this 24th day of April 2002.
ATTEST:
Dennis Chiniaeff, Chairperson
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
CITY OF TEMECULA
)
) ss
)
I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certifythat
PC Resolution No. 02-__was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 24th day of April, 2002, by the following vote of
the Commission:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
R:~D P~001~01-03B6 Temecula Partners industrial Spec Bldg\F[NAL PC STAFFRPT.doc 8
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
R:~D P~001~01-0386 Temecula Partners Industrial Spec Bldg~FINAL PC STAFFRPT.doc
9
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No.:
Project Description:
DIF Category:
Assessor's Parcel No.:
Approval Date:
Expiration Date:
PA01-0386 Development Plan
Planning Application to construct, establish
and operate a 33,226 square foot
warehouse/industrial speculative building on
1.91 acres of vacant land
Business Park/Industrial
909-360-041
April 24, 2002
April 24, 2004
PLANNING DIVISION
Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project
1. The applicant shall deliver to the Community Development Department - Planning Division
a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty-
Four Dollars ($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice
of Exemption required under Public Resources Code Section 21108(b) and California Code
of Regulations Section 15075. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant has
not delivered to the Community Development Department - Planning Division the check as
required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of
condition [Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)].
General Requirements
2. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to
indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend with Legal Counsel of the City's own
selection, the City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or
instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees,
consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents from any and all claims, actions,
awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, void, annul, seek
monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the
approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal
board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning
the Planning Application.
3. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or
proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the
defense of the action. The City reserves its right to take any and all action the City deems
to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense.
4. All conditions shall be complied with prior to any occupancy or use allowed by this
Development Plan.
R:\D P~2001\01-0386 Temecura Partners Industrial Spec Bldg\FINAL PC STAFFRPT.doc
10
o
10.
11.
The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of
this development plan.
This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall
become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction
contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period, which is thereafter diligently
pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this
'approval.
The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibits: "D"
(Site Plan), "E" (Building Elevation), "F" (Floor Plan), "G" (Landscape Plan), "H" (Grading
Plan), and "1" (Color and Material Board) contained on file with the Community Development
Department - Planning Division or as modified by these conditions of approval.
Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable
satisfaction of the Planning Director. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being
maintained, the Planning Director shall have the authority to require the property owner to
bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued
maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any
successors in interest.
All mechanical and roof equipment shall be fully screened from public view by being placed
below the lowest level of the surrounding parapet wall.
All Downspouts shall be internalized.
The colors and materials for the project shall substantially conform to those noted directly
below and with Exhibit "1" (Color and Material Board), or as superceded by these conditions,
contained on file with the Community Development Department - Planning Division.
Primary concrete exterior wall color:
Secondary exterior wall color:
EIFS cap color:
Vertical piaster pilasters color:
Metal canopy color:
Window and door glazing:
Window framing system:
Metal loading doors:
Vista #609 "Crushed ice"
Vista #606 "Blue Sage" and #545 "Blue Blood"
Vista #545 "Blue Blood"
Vista #545 "Blue Blood"
Vista #545 "Blue Blood"
Viracon Solarscreen #VS 5-14 "Spandrel Blue Glass"
Mill Finish Anodized Aluminum
Vista #606 "Blue Sage"
12. The construction landscape drawings shall indicate coordination and grouping of all utilities,
which are to be screened from view per applicable City Codes and guidelines.
Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits
13. The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be provided
by the Community Development Department - Planning Division staff, and return one
signed set to the Community Development Department - Planning Division for their files.
14. The applicant shall submit to the Community Development Department - Planning Division
for permanent filing two (2) 8" X 10" glossy photographic color prints of the approved Color
and Materials Board Exhibit "1", the colored architectural elevations to the Community
Development Department - Planning Division for their files. All labels on the Color and
Materials Board and Elevations shall be readable on the photographic prints.
15. The applicant shall submit a parking lot lighting plan to the Planning Department, which
meets the requirements of the Development Code and the Palomar Lighting Ordinance.
The parking lot light standards shall be placed in such a way as to not adversely impact the
growth potential of the parking lot trees.
16. A copy of the Grading Plan shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Department.
R:~D P~001',01-0386 Temecula Partners Industda~ Spec Bldg\FINAL PC STAFFRPT.doc 11
17. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal
Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that Ordinance or by
providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid.
18. If cultural resources are found on the project site, all grading activity shall cease and the
site shall be reviewed by an archeologist for cultural resource and archeological impacts.
Prior to Issuance of Building Permit
19. A Consistency Check fee shall be paid per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule.
20. Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation plans shall be reviewed and
approved by the Community Development Department - Planning Division. These plans
shall conform substantially with the approved Exhibit "G", or as amended by these
conditions. The location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be
shown. The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The cover page
shall identify the total square footage of the landscaped area for the site. The plans shall be
accompanied by the following items:
a. Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal).
b. One (1) copy of the approved grading plan.
c. Water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water
Efficient Ordinance).
d. Total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with the approved
plan).
21. The applicant shall submit to the Planning Department, details of the employee patio area,
to include type of furniture and amenities to be installed.
22. The design of all decorative concrete paving, including color and finish, shall be shown on
the construction plans and approved by the Planning Department.
23. A reciprocal access agreement shall be established in the property title to provide for
common access between this property and the parcel to the east.
24. The applicant shall submit a revised earth-tone color palette with color samples and color
elevation drawings of the building for approval by the Planning Director.
25. A multi-tenant sign program shall be submitted with the appropriate fee, in conformance
with City Ordinances, Design Guidelines, and Development Code for review and approval
by the Planning Department.
Prior to Building Occupancy
26. The property owner shall fully install all required landscaping and irrigation, and submit a
landscape maintenance bond in a form and amount approved by the Planning Department
for a period of one-year from the date of the first occupancy permit.
27. The construction plans shall indicate the application of painted rooftop addressing plotted
on a 9-inch gdd pattern with 45-inch tall numerals spaced 9-inch apart. The numerals shall
be painted with a standard 9-inch paint roller using fluorescent yellow paint applied over a
contrasting background. The address shall be oriented to the street and placed as closely
as possible to the edge of the building closest to the street.
28. Separate building permit applications for the installation of signage shall be submitted in
conformance with City Ordinances, Design Guidelines, and Development Code.
R:'~D P~001\01-0386 Temecula Partners Industrial Spec Bldg\FINAL PC STAFFRPT.doc
12
BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT
29.
All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 1998 edition of the
California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 1998 National Electrical Code;
California Administrative Code, Title 24 ~Energy and Disabled Access Regulations and the
Temecula Municipal Code.
30.
Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plans showing compliance
with Ordinance No. 855 for the regulation of light pollution. All streetlights and other outdoor
lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and
Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly~upon
adjoining property or public rights-of-way.
31.
A receipt or clearance letter frem the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted to
the Building & Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School
Mitigation Fees.
32.
Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction
work.
33. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review.
34.
Disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building is required. The
path of travel shall meet the California Disabled Access Regulations in terms of cross
slope, travel slope stripping and signage. Provide all details on plans. (California Disabled
Access Regulations effective April 1, 1998)
35.
All building and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations. Provide
all details on plans. (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1, 1998)
36. Provide van .accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entry.
37.
Provide house electrical meter provisions for power for the operation of extedor lighting, fire
alarm systems.
88.
Restroom fixtures, number and type, to be in accordance with the provisions of the 1998
edition of the California Building Code Appendix 29. Obtain the Division of the State
Architect recommendation for the accessible restreom dimensions for toddlers from the
Building Official, to implement in the building design.
39. Provide an approved automatic fire sprinkler system.
40.
Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans prior
to permit issuance.
41.
Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic
and mechanical plan for plan review.
42.
Truss calculations that are stamped by the engineer of record and the truss manufacturer
engineer are required for plan review submittal.
43. Provide precise grading plan for plan check submittal to check for handicap accessibility.
R:\D P~2001\01-0386 Temecula Par[nets Industrial Spec Bldg\FINAL PC STAFFRPT,dOc
13
44. A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the
building construction.
45.
Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standard and any block walls if not on the approved
building plans, will require separate approvals and permits.
46.
Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrance to the project that indicates the
hours of construction, shown below, as allowed by the City of Temecula Ordinance No. 0-
90-04, specifically Section G (1) of Riverside County Ordinance No. 457.73, for any site
within one-quarter mile of an occupied residence.
Monday-Friday
6:30 a.m. - 6:30 p.m.
Saturday
7:00 a.m. - 6:30 p.m.
No work is permitted on Sunday or Government Holidays
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
47. Unless otherwise noted, all conditions shall be completed, by the Developer at no cost to
any Government Agency. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the site
plan all existing and proposed property lines, easements, traveled ways, improvement
constraints and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be
resubmitted for further review and revision.
General Requirements
48. A Grading Permit for either rough and/or precise grading, including all on-site flat work and
improvements, shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained street right-of-way.
49. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way.
50. All improvement plans and grading plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent
projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on
standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula my[ars.
Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit
51. A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed and
approved bythe Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include all necessary
erosion control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and private
property.
52. The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading
and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and
subject to approval by the Department of Public Works.
53. A Soil Report shall be prepared by a registered Soil or Civil Engineer and submitted to the
Director of the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report
shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the
construction of engineered structures and pavement sections.
54. A Geological Report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted to
the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall
address special study zones and the geological conditions of the site, and shall provide
recommendations to mitigate the impact of ground shaking and liquefaction.
R:~D P~2001\01-0386 Temecula Partners Industrial Spec BIdg\FINAL PC STAFFRPT.doc
55. The Developer shall have a Drainage Study prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in
accordance with City Standards identifying storm water runoff expected from this site and
upstream .of this site. Th~ study shall identify all existing or proposed public or private
drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. The study shall also analyze and
identify impacts to downstream properties and provide specific recommendations to protect
the properties and mitigate any impacts. Any upgrading or upsizing of downstream
facilities, including acquisition of drainage or access easements necessary to make
required improvements, shall be provided by the Developer.
56. The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No
grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been flied or the
project is shown to be exempt.
57. As deemed necessary by the Director of the Department of Public Works, the Developer
shall receive written clearance from the following agencies:
a. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
b. Planning Department
c. Department of Public Works
d. Southern California Edison
58. The Developer shall comply with all constraints, which may be shown upon an
Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the
subject properly.
59. Permanent landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department
and the Department of Public Works for review and approval.
60. The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or slope easements for off-site
work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public Works.
61. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by either cashier's check
or money order,, prior to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area drainage plan
fee. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been credited to this
property, no new charge needs to be paid.
Prior to Issuance of a Building Permit
62. A Parcel Merger to combine Parcel 22 and Parcel B of amended LI_:A #98-0119 shall be
processed.
63. improvement plans and/or precise grading plans shall conform to applicable City of
Temecula Standards subject to approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works.
The following design criteria shall be observed:
a. Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over A.C.
paving.
b. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula Standard No. 207A.
c. All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees.
d. Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and
adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility.
e. All concentrated drainage directed towards the public street shall be conveyed
through undersidewalk drains.
R:'~D P~2001',01-0386 Temecula Par[hers Industrial Spec Bldg\F[NAL PC STAFFRPT.dcc
15
64. The Developer shall construct the following public improvements in conformance with
applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Director of the Department of
Public Works.
a. Street improvements, which may include, but not limited to: drive approaches
65. The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance
with the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered Civil Engineer, and the Soil
Engineer shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions.
66. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as
required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all
Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06.
67. The Developer shall record a written offer to participate in, and waive all rights to object to
the formation of an Assessment District, a Community Facilities District, or a Bridge and
Major Thoroughfare Fee District for the construction of the proposed Western Bypass
Corridor in accordance with the General Plan. The form of the offer shall be subject to the
approval of the City Engineer and City Attorney.
Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy
· 68. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
a. Rancho California water District
b. Eastern Municipal Water District
c. Department of Public Works
69. All public improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and
City standards to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works.
70. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall
be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of
Public Works.
FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
71.
Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by
the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the
California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes, which are
in force at the time of building, plan submittal.
72.
The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a'minimum fire flow for the remodel or
construction of all commercial buildings per CFC Appendix III.A, Table A-III-A-1. The
developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 2500 GPM at
20 PSI residual operating pressure, plus an assumed sprinkler demand of 1850 GPM for a
total fire flow of 4350 GPM with a 4 hour duration. The required fire flow may be adjusted
during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic
fire protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire Flow as
given above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC 903.2, Appendix Ill-A)
73. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC
Appendix Ill-B, Table A-III-B-1. A minimum of 5 hydrants, in a combination of on-site and
off-site (6" x 4" x 2-2 1/2" outlets) shall be located on Fire Department access roads and
adjacent public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 300 feet apart, at each intersection and
shall be located no more than 180 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department
access road(s) frontage to a hydrant, The required fire flow shall be available from any
R:~D P~.001~1-0386 Temecula Padners Industrial Spec Bldg\F[NAL PC STAFFRPT.doc 16
adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required.
(CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix Ill-B)
74.
As required by the California Fire Code, when any portion of the facility is in excess of 150
feet from a water supply on a public street, as measured by an approved route around the
exterior of the facility, on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire
flow shall be provided. For this project on site fire hydrants are required. (CFC 903.2)
75.
If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection
prior to any building construction. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2)
76.
Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have
approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent roads
are installed. Temporary Fire Department access reads shall be an all weather surface for
80,000 lbs. GVW. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2)
77.
Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved Fire
Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or any
portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be an all
weather surface designed for 80,000 lbs. GVW with a minimum AC thickness of .25 feet.
(CFC sec 902)
78.
Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than
twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13)
feet six (6) inches. (CFC 902.2.2.1)
79.
The gradient for fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed fifteen (15) percent. (CFC
902.2.2.6 Ord. 99-14)
80.
Prior to building construction, dead end roadways and streets in excess of one hundred and
fifty (150) feet, which have not been completed, shall have a turnaround capable of
accommodating fire apparatus. (CFC 902.2.2.4)
81.
Prior to building construction, this development shall have two (2) points of access, via all-
weather surface roads, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 902.2.1)
82.
Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water
system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall be
signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature
block; and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards.
After the local water company signs the plans, the originals shall be presented to the Fire
Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system including fire hydrants shall
be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building
materials being placed on an individual lot. (CFC 8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and National Fire
Protection Association 24 1-4.1 )
83.
Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective Markers"
shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations. (CFC 901.4.3)
84. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, approved numbers or
addresses shall be provided on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be
plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Numbers shall be of
a contrasting color to their background. Commercial, multi-family residential and industrial
buildings sha~l have a minimum twelve (12) inches numbers with suite numbers a minimum
R:~D P~2001~01-0386 Temecula Partners Industrial Spec Bldg'~FINAL PC STAFFRPT.doc 17
of six (6) inches in size. All suites shall give a minimum of six (6) inch high letters and/or
numbers on both the front and rear doors. Single family residences and multi-family
residential units shall have four (4) inch letters and/or numbers, as approved by the Fire
Prevention Bureau. (CFC 901.4.4)
85.
Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on square footage and
type of construction, occupancy or use, the developer shall install a fire sprinkler system.
Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to
installation. (CFC Article 10, CBC Chapter 9)
86.
Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on a requirement for
monitoring the sprinkler system, occupancy or use, the developer shall install an fire alarm
system monitored by an approved Underwriters Laboratory listed central station. Plans
shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. (CFC
Article 10)
87.
Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a "Knox-Box" shall be
provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six (8) feet in height and be
located to the right side of the main entrance door. (CFC 902.4)
88.
All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates
obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry
system for emergency access by fire fighting personnel. (CFC 902.4)
89.
Prior to final inspection of any building, the applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire
Department for approval, a site plan designating Fire Lanes with appropriate lane painting
and or signs.
90.
Prior to the building final, speculative buildings capable of housing high-piled combustible
stock, shall be designed with the following fire protection and life safety features: an
automatic fire sprinkler system(s) designed for a specific commodity class and storage
arrangement, hose stations, alarm systems, smoke vents, draft curtains, Fire Department
access doors and Fire department access roads. Buildings housing high-piled combustible
stock shall comply with the provisions California Fire Code Article 81 and all applicable
National Fire Protection Association standards. (CFC Article 81)
91.
Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, the developer/applicant
shall be responsible for obtaining underground and/or aboveground tank permits for the
storage of combustible liquids, flammable liquids or any other hazardous materials from
both the County Health department and Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 7901.3 and 8001.3)
Special Conditions
92.
Prior to building permit issuance, a full technical report may be required to be submitted and
to the Fire Prevention Bureau. This report shall address, but not be limited to, all fire and life
safety measures per 1998 CFC, 1998 CBC, NFPA - 13, 24, 72 and 231-C.
93.
Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final a simple plot plan and a
simple floor plan, each as an electronic file of the .DWG format must be submitted to the
Fire Prevention Bureau. Alternative file formats may be acceptable, contact fire prevention
for approval.
R:\D P~001\01-0386 Temecu[a Partners Industrial Spec Bldg\FINAL PC STAFFRPT.doc
18
94. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Fire Code permit process and
update any changes in the items and quantities approved as part of their Fire Code permit.
These changes shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for review and approval
per the Fire Code and is subject to inspection. (CFC 105)
95. The applicant shall submit for review and approval by the Riverside County Department
of Environmental Health and City Fire Department an update to the Hazardous Material
Inventory Statement and Fire Department Technical Report on file at the city; should any
quantities used or stored onsite increase or should changes to operation introduce any
additional hazardous material not listed in existing reports. (CFC Appendix II-E)
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
96. All perimeter landscaping and parkways shall be maintained by the property owner or
private maintenance association.
The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of
construction debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul construction debris.
If additional street lights are to be installed, the developer shall file an application with the
Community Services District (CSD) and pay the appropriate energy fees related to the
transfer of said streetlights into the CSD maintenance program, prior to the issuance of
building permits or installation of streetlights, whichever comes first.
97.
98.
Applicant Signature
Date
Applicant Printed Name
R:~D P~2001\01-0386 Temecula Partners Industrial Spec Bldg~FINAL PC STAFFRPT.doc
19
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
EXHIBITS
R:~D P~001~01-0386 Temecula Partners Industrial Spec BIdg\FINAL PC STAFFRPT.doc
20
ClTY OFTEMECULA
CASE NO. - PA01-0386
EXHIBIT - A
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - April 24, 2002
VICINITY MAP
R:\D P~001~01-0386 Temecula Partners Industrial Spec Bldg\FINAL PC STAFFRPT.doc
CITY OF TEMECULA
EXHIBIT B - ZONING MAP
DESIGNATION - LI (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL)
EXHIBIT C - GENERAL PLAN MAP
DESIGNATION - BP (BUSINESS PARK)
CASE NO. - PA01-0386
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - April 24, 2002
R:~D P~001\01-0386 Temecula Partgers Industrial Spec Bldg\FINAL PC STAFFRPT.doc
22
CITY OF TEMECULA
Conceptual Site Plan - Tetnecula Partners LLCo West
Temecula, California
A1
CASE NO. - PA01-0386
EXHIBIT - D
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - APRIL 24, 2002
I
R:~/3 P~001~01-0386 Temecula Partners Industrial Spec Bldg\FINAL PC STAFFRPT,doc
23
SITE PLAN
CITY OFTEMECULA
CONCEPTUAL ELEVATIONS
Temecula Partners I.I. Co West
Temeculs, California
AS
CASE NO. - PA01-0386
EXHIBIT- E
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - APRIL 24, 2002
R:~D P~20Ol~O1q3386 Temecula Partners industrial Spec Bldg~FINAL PC STAFFRPT.doc
24
ELEVATION PLAN NO. 1
CITY OFTEMECULA
CONCEPTUAL ELEVATIONS
Tamecula Partners LLC. Wast
Temacula, California
A4
CASE NO. - PA01-0386
EXHIBIT- E
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - APRIL 24, 2002
ELEVATION PLAN NO. 2
R:~D P~001~01-0386 Temecula Partners Industrial Spec Bldg\FINAL PC STAFFRPT.doc
25
ClTY OFTEMECULA
Conceptual Foor Plan - Temecu'la Partners LLC- West
Temecula, Callfornia
A2
CASE NO. - PA01-0386
EXHIBIT- F
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - APRIL 24, 2002
R:~D P~2.001\01-0386 Temecula Partners Industrial Spec Bldg\FINAL PC STAFFRPT.doc
26
FLOOR PLAN
CITY OF TEMECULA
~ ~ ......... Winchester Road
NOTES:
Conceptual Landscape Plan - Temecula Partners LLC - West
Temecula, California
L1
CASE NO. - PA01-0386
EXHIBIT- G
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - APRIL 24, 2002
LANDSCAPE PLAN
R:'~D P~001~1-0386 Temecula Partners Industrial Spec Bidg\FINAL PC STAFFRPT.doc
27
CITY OFTEMECULA
d
CASE NO. - PA01-0386
EXHIBIT - H
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - APRIL 24, 2002
GRADING PLAN
R:",D P~001\01-0386 Temecula Partners Industrial Spec Bldg\FINAL PC STAFFRPT,doc
28