Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout92_024 PC ResolutionATrACHIVIF_aNT NO. 1 RESOLUTION NO. 92-024 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING EXTENSION OF TIME FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2, REVISED NO. 1, ON A PARCEL CONTAINING 3.0 ACRES LOCATED ON ~ WEST SIDE OF YNEZ ROAD AND ~ EAST SIDE OF INTERSTATE 15, APPROXIMATELY 200 FEET NORTH OF THE INTERSECTION OF YNEZ ROAD AND SOLANA WAY AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 921-080-054. WHEREAS, Colboum-Currier-Noll-Architectum, Inc. f'ded an Extension of Time for Conditional Use Permit No. 2, Revised No. 1, in accordance with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference; WHEREAS, said Conditional Use Permit application was approved by the Planning Commission on September 17, 1990 at which fane interested parties had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition. W~REAS, the Planning Commission approved Revision No. 1 to Conditional Use Permit No. 2 on June 17, 1991 at which time interested paxties had an opportunity to test'fly either in support or opposition. WHEREAS, said Extension of Time application was processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing pertaining to said Extension of Time on April 20, 1992, at which tune interested persons had opportunity to testify either in support or opposition to said Extension of Time; and WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commission recommended approval of said Extension of Time; NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section I. Findings. following f'mdings: That the Temecula Planning Commission hereby makes the A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly incorporated city shall adopt a general plan within thirty (30) months following incorporation. During that 30-month period of time, the city is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the requirements of state law that its decisions be consistent with the general plan, if all of the following requirements are met: S~STAFFRPT~-RI.CUP 6 general plan. The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of the 2. The planning agency finds, in approving projects and taking other actions, including the issuance of building permits, each of the following: a. There is a reasonable probability that the land use or action proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be studied within a reasonable time. b. There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan. c. The proposed use or action complied with all other applicable requirements of state law and local ordinances. B. The Riverside County General Plan, as amended by the Southwest Area Community Plan, (hereinafter "SWAP") was adopted prior to the incorporation of Temecula as the General Plan for the southwest portion of Riverside County, including the area now within the boundaries of the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as its General Plan guidelines while the City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of its General Plan. C. The proposed Extension of Time for Conditional Use Permit No. 2 is consistent with the SWAP and meets the requirements set forth in Section 65360 of the Government Code, to wit: The City is proceeding in a timely fashion with a preparation of the general plan. 2. The Planning Commission finds, in approving of projects and taking other actions, including the issuance of building permits, pursuant to this title, each of the following: a. There is reasonable probability that the Extension of Time proposed for Conditional Use Permit No. 2 will be consistent with the General Plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be studied within a reasonable time, because the project is consistent with Ordinance No. 348 and SWAP. b. There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan, because the project is similar in use and intensity to adjacent development. c. The proposed use or action complies with all other applicable requirements of state law and local ordinances. The project is consistent with Ordinance lqo. 348 which conforms with State Laws. S\STAFFRPT~2-R1 .CUP 7 D. Pursuant to Section 18.27(f), no Extension of Time for Conditional Use Permit may be approved unless the following findings can be made: 1. The proposed Extension of Time must conform to all the General Plan requirements and with all applicable requirements of state law and City ordinances. 2. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety and general welfare; conforms to the logical development of the land and is compatible with the present and future logical development of the surrounding property. E. The Planning Commission, in approving the proposed Extension of Time, makes the following fmdings, to wit: 1. No subsequent changes are proposed in the project which will require important revisions of the previous Negative Declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental impacts not considered in a previous Negative Declaration on the project. 2. No substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the project was undertaken, such as a substantial deterioration in the air quality where the project will be located, which will require important revisions in the previous Negative Declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental impacts not covered in the previous Negative Declaration. 3. No new information of substantial importance to the project has become available. 4. Said f'mdings are supported by minutes, maps, exhibits and environmental documents associated with these applications and herein incorporated by reference. This staff report contains mapping and conditions of approval which support the staff recommendation. 5. The Commission, therefore, reaff'mns the f'mdings made at the time of the original approval for Conditional Use Permit No. 2, Revised No. 1. F. As conditioned pursuant to SECTION 1II, the Extension of Time for Conditional Use Permit No. 2 proposed conforms to the logical development of its proposed site, and is compatible with the present and future development of the surrounding property. Section II. Environmental Compliance. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby determines that the previous environmental determination (Adoption of Negative Declaration for Conditional Use Permit No. 2, Revised No. 1,) still applies to Conditional Use Permit No. 2, Revised No. 1, Extension of Time. $\STAFFRPT~2-RI.CUP 8 Section Ill. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby approves the Extension of Time for Conditional Use Permit No. 2, Revised No. 1, extending the approval period for Conditional Use Permit No. 2, Revised No. 1, on a parcel containing 3.0 acres located on the west side of Ynez Road and the east side of Interstate 15, approximately 200 feet north of the intersection of Ynez Road and Solana Way and known as Assessor's Parcel No. 921-080-054 and subject to the following conditions: 1. Attachment No. 2, hereto. Section IV. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 20th day of April 1992. I HEREBY CERTI]FY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 20th day of April 1992 by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: 5 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: BLAIR, CHINIAEFF, FAHEY, FORD, AND HOAGLAND NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: $~,STAFFRPT~2-R 1 .CUP 9