Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout93_018 PC Resolution ATTACHMENT NO. 1 PC RESOLUTION NO. 93-18 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF ~ CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLOT PLAN NO. PA93-0124, AMENDMIr~NT NO. 1 TO CONSTRUCT A 41,925 SQUARE FOOT TILT-UP INDUSTRIAL BUILDING FOR STERILIZATION, WAREltOUSING, AND DISTRIBUTION FOR NEW M~DICAL PRODUCTS ON A PARCEL LOCATED ON ~ EAST SIDE OF BUSINESS PARK DRIVE BETWEEN RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AND RANCHO WAY AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 921-020-060. WHEREAS, Lusardi Construction Company fried Plot Plan No. PA93-0124, Amendment No. 1 in accordance with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference; WI-W~REAS, said application was processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; Wi~S, the Planning Commission conducted a public heating pertaining to said application on July 19, 1993, at which time interested persons had opportunity to testify either in support or opposition to said application and; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission heating, the Commission recommended approval of said application; NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER. AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Findim, s. That the Temecula Planning Commission hereby makes the following findings: A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly incorporated city shall adopt a general plan within thirty (30) months following incorporation. During that 30-month period of time, the city is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the requirements of state law that its decisions be consistent with the general plan, if all of the following requ'trements are met: I. The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of the general plan. 2. The planning agency finds, in approv'mg projects and taldng other actions, including the issuance of building permits, each of the following: a. There is a reasonable probability that the land use or action proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be studied within a reasonable time. b. There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan. c. The proposed use or action complied with all other applicable requirements of state law and local ordinances. B. The Riverside County General Plan, aa amended by the Southwest Area Community Plan, (hereinafter "SWAP") was adopted prior to the incorporation of Temecula aa the General Plan for the southwest portion of Riverside County, including the area now within the boundaries of the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP aa its General Plan guidelines while the City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of its General Plan. C. The proposed application is consistent with the SWAP and meets the requirements set forth in Section 65360 of the Government Code, to wit: plan. The City is proceeding in a timely fashion with a preparation of the general 2. The Planning Commission finds, in recommending approval of projects and taking other actions, including the issuance of building permits, pursuant to this title, each of the following: a. There is reasonable probability that the said application will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be studied within a reasonable time since the project is consistent with the existing SWAP and zoning designation. b. There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan since the project is compatible with surrounding development. c. The proposed use or action complies with all other applicable requirements of state law and local ordinances since it complies with Ordinance No. 348. D. Pursuant to Section 18.30(c), no plot plan may be approved unless the following findings can be made: 1. The proposed use must conform to all the General Plan requirements and with all applicable requirements of state law and City ordinances. R:~S~STAFFI~T~I24PA93.PC 7128193 Idb 7 2. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety and general welfare; conforms to the logical development of the land and is compatible with the present and future logical development of the surrounding property. E. The Planning Commission, in recommending approval of the proposed Plot Plan, makes the following findings, to wit: 1. This project will likely be consistent with the future General Plan since it is located within an existing business park and the General Plan will most likely designate the site as Business Park. The draft preferred Land Use Map shows the project site as Business Park. 2. This project is consistent with the Southwest Area Plan (SWAP) which designates the site as Light Industrial. 3. This project is consistent with the M-SC zone since it meets all the requirements for this zone. 4. This project will not have a significant impact on the environment since all the impacts have been mitigated to a level of insignificance. 5. The proposed project is suitable for the site since it accommodates all the structures, the necessary parking, landscaping and circulation for the site. F. As conditioned pursuant to Section 3, the Plot Plan proposed conforms to the logical development of its proposed site, and is compatible with the present and future development of the surrounding property. Section 2. Environmental Compliance. Adoption of the Negative Declaration for Plot Plan No. PA93-0124, Amendment No. 1 is recommended. Section 3. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby approves Plot Plan No. PA93-0124, Amendment No. 1 to construct a 42,925 square foot tilt-up industrial building and known as Assessor's Parcel No. 921-020-060 subject to the following conditions: A. Attachment No. 2, attached hereto. Section 4. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOP~Ep~ this l~.~_~y of July, 1993. LINDA ~-. FAIIEY CHAIRMAN ~ I ItEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, h¢ld on the 19th day of July, 1993 by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: 4 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: CHINIAF. FF, FAItEY, FORD AND HOAGLAND NOES: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: 1 PLANNING COMlVIISSIONERS: BLAIR SECRETARY