HomeMy WebLinkAbout93_024 PC ResolutionATTACHMENT NO. 1
PC RESOLUTION NO. 93-24
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. PA93-0163, FIRST EXTENSION OF
TIME FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 24172,
AMENDMENT NO. 1, A SUBDIVISION OF 5 ACRES INTO
8 RESIDENTIAL PARCELS AND 1 STREET LOT IN THE R-
A-20,000 ZONE, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF YNEZ
ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 300 FEET SOUTH OF CALLE
HALCON, ALSO KNOW AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.
945-060-002.
WItEREAS, Michael J. Lanni filed Planning Application No. 93-0163, First Extension
of Time for Tentative Tract Map No. 24172, Amendment No. 1, in accordance with the
Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has
adopted by reference;
WHEREAS, said application were processed in the time and manner prescribed by State
and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered said application on November 1,
1993;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Findings. That the Temecula City Council hereby makes the following
findings:
A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly incorporated city shall
adopt a general plan within thirty (30) months following incorporation. During that 30-month
period of time, the city is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the
requirements of state law that its decisions be consistent with the general plan, if all of the
following requirements are met:
general plan.
The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of the
2. The planning agency finds, in approving projects and taking other actions,
including the issuance of building permits, each of the following:
a. There is a reasonable probability that the land use or action
proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which
will be studied within a reasonable time.
R:\S\STAFFRPT~163PA93.PC 1115/93 klb 6
b. There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or
interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately
inconsistent with the plan.
c. The proposed use or action complied with all other applicable
requirements of state law and local ordinances.
B. The Riverside County General Plan, as amended by the Southwest Area
Community Plan, (hereinafter "SWAP") was adopted prior to the incorporation of Temecula as
the General Plan for the southwest portion of Riverside County, including the area now within
the boundaries of the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as its General Plan
guidelines while the City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of its General
Plan.
C. The Planning Commission, in recommending approving of said applications makes
the following findings, to wit:
1. The f'mdings for the original approval for Tentative Tract Map No. 24172,
Amendment No. 1 are found to remain valid except as amended herein.
2. No new information of substantial importance to the project has become
available.
3. There is a reasonable probability that Tentative Tract Map No. 24172,
Amendment No. i, First Extension of Time will be consistent with the City's Draft General
Plan, which will be completed in a reasonable time and in accordance with State law. The Draft
General Plan Land Use Designation for the site is Very Low Residential. The proposed
development is consistent with the Draft General Plan and the current zoning of R-A-20,000.
4. There is not a likely probability of substantial detriment to or interference
with the future General Plan, if the proposed use is ultimately inconsistent with the plan due to
the fact that the proposed use is consistent with the existing zoning and existing residential
development in the surrounding area.
5. No subsequent changes are proposed in the project which would require
revisions to the previously certified Negative Declaration due to the involvement of new
significant environmental impacts not considered in the previously approval of this project.
6. The proposed use or action complies with State planning and zoning laws.
The proposed use complies with City of Temecula Ordinance No. 460 and Ordinance No. 348.
7. The site is suitable to accommodate the proposed land use in terms of the
size and shape of the lot configuration, circulation patterns, access, and intensity of use, due to
the fact that the proposed subdivision complies with the standards of Ordinance No. 460.
R:\S\STAFFR~T~163PA93.PC 11/5/93 k[b 7
8. The proposal will not have an adverse effect on surrounding property,
because it does not represent a significant change to the planned land use of the area, due to the
fact that the proposed use is compatible proposed land use designation of Very Low Residential.
9. Said findings are supported by maps, exhibits and environmental
documents associated with these applications and herein incorporated by reference.
F. As conditioned pursuant to Section 3, the Tract Map proposed is compatible with
the health, safety and welfare of the community.
Section 2. Environmental Compliance. A Negative Declaration was prepared for the
original approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 24172, Amendment No. 1. The project is
unchanged from that which was originally approved and will not have a significant impact on
the environment due to the fact that mitigation measures have been incorporated into the project
design.
Section 3. Conditions. The City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby approves
Planning Application PA93-0163, First Extension of Time for Tentative Tract Map No. 24172,
Amendment No. 1, a request to subdivide a 5 acre parcel into 8 single family lots and 1 street
lot located on the east side of Ynez Road, approximately 300 feet south of Calle Halcon, subject
to the following conditions:
A. Attachment No. 2, attached hereto.
R:\S\STAFFRPT~lO3PA93.PC 11/5/93 Idb 8
Section 4. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 1st day of November, 1993.
CHAIRMAN
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 1st day of
November, 1993 by the following vote of the Commission:
AYES:
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 0
4 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: BLAIR, FAHEY, HOAGLAND
AND FORD
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
GARY THORNHILL
SECRETARY
R:\S\STAFFRPTH63PA93.PC 11/5/93 Idb 9