HomeMy WebLinkAbout94_029 PC Resolution • i
PC RESOLUTION NO. 94-29
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION O. THE CITY OF
TEMECULA RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ORDINANCE NO. 94-
AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY FOR
CHANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION NO. 26, CHANGING THE ZONE
FROM R-A-20 (RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL 20 ACRE MINIMUM
PARCEL SIZE) TO C-O (COMMERCIAL OFFICE) ON PROPERTY
LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF RANCHO
CALIFORNIA ROAD AND RIDGE PARK DRIVE AND KNOWN AS
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 940-310-014
WHEREAS, Brain Kennedy and Drake Kennedy filed Ct,r..11 a of Zone No. 26 in
accordance with the Riverside County General Plan, Land Use and 'subdivision Ordinances,
which the City has adopted by reference;
WHEREAS, Change of Zone No. 26 was processed in the tim; and manner prescribed
by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Change of Zone No. 26 on June 6,
1994, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time interested persons had
an opportunity to testify either in support or in opposition;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the public hearing, the PlannL ly Commission continued
the item to the September 19, 1994 Planning Commission meeting;
WHEREAS,the Planning Commission considered Change of Zone No. 26 on September
19, 1994, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at whist; time interested persons
had an opportunity to testify either in support or in opposition;
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and conAcering all testimony and
arguments, if any, of all persons deserving to be heard, the Commjs;,_on considered all facts
relating to Change of Zone No. 26;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSIG,'N, OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
R:\STAFFRPT\26CZ.PC2 11/22/94 klb 6
• 0
Section 2. Findings.
A. The Planning Commission in recommending approval of Change of Zone No. 26,
makes the following findings, to wit:
(1) The proposed zone change will not have a significant adverse effect on the
environment, as determined in the Initial Study for this project. No 1 amediate impacts to the
environment will result from the Change of Zone. Impacts from fuTdre development can be
mitigated to a level less than significant.
(2) The zone change is consistent with the City's General Plan Land Use
designation for the site. It is likely that Commercial Office uses will ultimately be consistent
with the Professional Office designation. The uses are similar in botL Ordinance No. 348 and
the draft General Plan.
(3) The site of the proposed Change of Zone is suitable to accommodate all
the land uses currently permitted in the proposed zoning district due .o the fact that the parcel
is of adequate size and shape for any proposed use. Section 9.75.a. of Ordinance No. 348
(Development Standards for Commercial Office) requires no minimum size for lot area.
Landscaping, parking and lot coverage requirements will be met upon ultimate submittal of a
development proposal.
(4) Said findings are supported by analysis, exhi`..ts, and environmental
documents associated with this application and herein incorporated by n;ference.
Section 3. Environmental Compliance. An Initial Study was ;;.-,formed for this project
which determined that although the proposed project could have a gnificant effect on the
environment, no significant impact would immediately result to the r:x al or built environment
in the City. Future development of the site may result in impacts to the environment, however,
these can be mitigated to a level less than significant at the project development review stage.
Section 4. Planning Commission Recommendation. Based upon the the findings set
forth above, the Planning Commission recommends that the City Coi.ncil approve Change of
Zone No. 26 and adopt the Ordinance reflecting the same.
Section S. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPT this 19th;day of September, 1994.
FORD
CHAIR"AN
R:\STAFFRPT\26CZ.PC2 11/22/94 klb 7
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 19th day of
September, 1994 by the following vote of the Commission:
AYES: 4 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Fahey, Slav::n, Webster, Ford
NOES: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: 1 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Blair
G Y TN'DRNHILL
SECRETkRY
RASTAFFRPT26CZ.PC2 11/22/94 k.` 8