HomeMy WebLinkAbout94_030 PC Resolution PC RESOLUTION NO. 94-30
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA DENYING VESTING
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 25063 TO SUBDIVIDE A 20
ACRE PARCEL INTO 68 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS AND ONE
OPEN SPACE LOT LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF
NICOLAS ROAD APPROXIMATELY 2,000 FEET EAST OF
CALLE GIRASOL AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL
NO. 914-480-005
WHEREAS, David Mulvaney filed Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 25063 in
accordance with the Riverside County General Plan, Land Use and Subdivision Ordinances,
which the City has adopted by reference;
WHEREAS, the application for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 25063 was not
processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law due to the applicant's failure
to make timely submittals;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Vesting luatative Tract Map No.
25063 on November 18, 1991, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which
time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support ,:)r in opposition;
WHEREAS, at the public hearing, the Commission continued Vesting Tentative Tract
Map No. 25063 off-calendar;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Vesting Tentative Tract Map No.
25063 on June 6, 1994, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time
interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or in opposition;
WHEREAS, at the public hearing, the item was continued to the July 18, 1994 Planning
Commission meeting;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Vesting f—Aative Tract Map No.
25063 on July 18, 1994, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribe.: by law, at which time
interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or in opposition;
WHEREAS, at the public hearing, the item was continued tr, 'he September 19, 1994
Planning Commission meeting;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Vesting 3' ntative Tract Map No.
25063 on September 19, 1994, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which
time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or in opposition;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION; OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
R:\STAPFRPT125063.PC3 11/22/94 klb 6
0
Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
Section 2. Findings. The Planning Commission, in denying the proposed Tentative
Map, makes the following findings, to wit:
(1) The proposed use or action does not com;ly with all applicable
requirements of state law and local ordinances due to the fact that the applicant failed to submit
all required information in a timely manner. Therefore, the proj act. could not be deemed
complete in accordance with State and local law.
(2) Because the proposed density is inconsistent with the City's adopted
General Plan, staff cannot make the finding that the project is consistent with the General Plan.
Section 3. Environmental Compliance. Per Section 15270 of the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), CEQA does not apply to projects which a public agency
disapproves. Therefore, no environmental determination was prepanx for this project.
Section 4. Planning Commission Action. Based upon the findings set forth above and
the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby denies Vesting
Tentative Tract Map No. 25063.
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADO this 19th day of September, 1994.
TEVEN F.—FORD
CHAIRMAN
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 19th day of
September, 1994 by the following vote of the Commission:
AYES: 4 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Fahey, Slaven, Webster, Ford
NOES: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: 1 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Blair
(ARY 71-dORNHILL
SECRETARY
R:\STAFFRPT\25063.PC3 11/22/94 klb 7