HomeMy WebLinkAbout96_025 PC ResolutionPC RESOLUTION NO. 96-25
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA RECOMMENDING APPROVAL BY THE CITY COUNCIL
OF AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT OF DEVELOPMF, NT
AGREEMENT NO. 3 BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND VAN
DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION/WRI ASSOCIATES, INC.
FOR FINAL TRACT MAPS NO. 22761 AND 22762, WITHIN SPECIFIC
PLAN NO. 180 (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA96-0130)
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula has received an
application from Van Daele Development Corporation/WRI Associates, Inc. for an
Amendment and Restatement of Development Agreement No. 3, Specific Plan No. 180,
"Rancho Highlands," Planning Application No. PA96-0130, (hereinafter "Development
Agreement"); and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a noticed public hearing on September 16,
1996, on the issue of recommending approval or denial of the Development Agreement.
NOW, TItF, REFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA DOES FIND AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council adopt and
approve the Ordinance approving the Development Agreement, Attachments "A" and "B",
respectively, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, subject to the
Conditions of Approval attached hereto as Attachment "C" and incorporated herein by this
reference as set forth in full herein.
Section 2. That in recommending adoption by the City Council of an Ordinance
approving the Development Agreement, the Planning Commission hereby makes the following
findings: ·
(a) The Development Agreement is consistent with the objectives, policies,
general land uses, and programs specified in the City of Temecula's General Plan in that the
Development Agreement makes reasonable provision for the use of certain real property for
residential development and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Designation of Low-
Medium Density Residential; and,
R:~TAFFRPT~I30PA96.PC 9/17/96 mi=
(b) The project subject to the Development Agreement is compatible with the
uses authorized in, and the regulations prescribed for, the Specific Plan Zone district in which
the Property subject to the Development Agreement is located, and that this Development
Agreement is consistent with good planning practices by providing for the opportunity to
develop the Property consistent with the General Plan; and,
(c) The Development Agreement is in conformity with the public convenience,
general welfare, and good land use practice because it makes reasonable provision for a
balance of land uses compatible with the remainder of the City; and,
(d) The Development Agreement will not be detrimental to the health,
safety, or general welfare because it provides adequate assurances for the protection thereof;
and,
(e) Notice of the public hearing before the Planning Commission was
published in a newspaper of general circulation at least ten (10) days before the Planning
Commission public hearing, and mailed or delivered at least ten (10) days prior to the heating
to the project applicant and to each agency expected to provide water, sewer, schools, police
protection, and fire protection, and to all property owners within six hundred feet (600') of the
property as shown on the latest equalized assessment roll; and,
(f) Notice of the public hearing before the Planning Commission included
the date, time, and place of the public hearing, the identity of the hearing body, a general
explanation of the matter to be considered, a general description and text or diagram of the
location of the real property that is the subject of the hearing, and of the need to exhaust
administrative remedies; and,
(g) The Development Agreement complies with the goals and objectives of
the Circulation Element of the General Plan and the traffic impacts of the development over
the period of the Development Agreement will be substantially mitigated by the mitigation
measures and conditions of approval imposed; and,
(h) The Development Agreement complies with requirements of the zoning
district in which the applicant proposes to develop in that the Low-Medium Density Residential
is consistent with the Low-Medium Residential General Plan Land Use Designation; and,
(i) The benefits that will accrue to the people of the City of Temecula from
this legislation and this Development Agreement are as follows:
City and Owner acknowledge that development of the Project will result in the
1. Generation of municipal revenue;
2. Construction of public infrastructure facilities;
3. Acceleration of both the timely development of subject property as well
as the payment of municipal revenue;
4. Enhancement of quality of life for surrounding residents with the timely
development through the elimination of dust and nuisance of partially improved lots;
5. Payment of Public Facility Fees (fire, library, traffic signal mitigation,
development and RSA); and,
Section 3. The Secretary of the Planning Commission shall cause this Resolution
to be transmitted to the City Counc'fl for further proceedings in accordance with State law.
Section 4. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 16th of September, 1996.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 16th day of
September, 1996, by the following vote of the Commission:
AYES: 5 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Fahey, Miller, Slaven,
Soltysiak
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 0
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: None
PLANNllXIG COMMISSIONERS: None
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
R:\STAFFRP~I30PA96.PC 9117/96 mf