Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout96_020 PC ResolutionPC RESOLUTION NO. 96-20 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA96-0008 (DEVELOPMENT PLAN) TO CONSTRUCT A 9,994 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE, AND WAREHOUSE FACILITY ON A PARCEL CONTAINING 1.75 ACRES LOCATED AT 41581 ENTERPRISE CIRCLE NORTH AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 909-281-026 AND 909-281-028 WHEREAS, Robert Tigilo filed Planning Application No. PA96-0008 in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan; WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PA96-0008 was processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission continued Planning Application No. PA96-0008 on May 20, 1996, June 17, 1996, and July 15, 1996, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or in opposition; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission continued Planning Application No. PA96-0008 to August 5, 1996; and WHEREAS, at the public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, the Commission considered all facts relating to Planning Application No. PA96-0008; and NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct. Section 2. Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving Planning Application No. PA96-0008 makes the following findings, to wit: 1. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. The project is consistent with all City Ordinances to include: Ordinance 348(Zoning Code), Ordinance No. 655 (Mt. Palomar Lighting Ordinance), and Ordinance No. 94-22 (Water Efficient Landscaping). R:\STAFFRPT\SPA96.PC3 8/19/96 slb 2. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety and welfare. The project as proposed complies with all City Ordinances and meets the standards adopted by the City of Temecula designed for the protection of the public health, safety and welfare. 3. The design of the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and unavoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. An Initial Study was prepared for the project and it has determined that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, these effects are not considered to be significant due to mitigation measures contained in the project design and in the Conditions of Approval added to the project. 4. As conditioned pursuant to Section 4, Planning Application No. PA96-0008 (Development Plan) as proposed, conforms to the logical development of its proposed site, and is compatible with the present and future development of the surrounding property. Section 3. t3nvironmental Compliance. An Initial Study prepared for this project indicates that although the proposed project could have a significant impact on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described in the Conditions of Approval have been added to the project, and a Negative Declaration, therefore, is hereby granted. Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby approves Planning Application No. PA96-0008 to construct a 9,994 square foot office, and warehouse facility located at 41581 Enterprise Cimle North and known as Assessor's Parcel No. 909-281-026 and 909-281-028 subject to the following conditions: A. Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference and made a part hereof. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ~/12)PTED this 15th day of July, 1996. E~nda Fahey, Chairman AYES: NOES: ABSENT: I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 15th day of July, 1996 by the following vote of the Commission: 3 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: FAHEY, SLAVEN, SOLTYSIAK 2 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: MILLER, WEBSTER 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NONE Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary R:\STAFFRPT~SPA96.FC3 8/16/96 slb