HomeMy WebLinkAbout96_009 PC ResolutionATTACHMENT NO. 1
PC RESOLUTION NO. 96-009
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA MODIFYING A PORTION OF
CONDITION OF APPROVAL NO. 44 OF PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. 94-0061 (MASTER CONDITIONAL USE
PER_MIT), A PORTION OF CONDITION OF APPROVAL
NO. 38 OF PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 95-0003
(WESTS]DE SPECIFIC PLAN); AND A PORTION OF
CONDITION OF APPROVAL NO. 83 OF PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. PA95-0004 (TENTATIVE TRACT MAP
NO. 28011) PERTAINING TO IMPROVEMENTS TO THE
INTERCHANGE AT RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AND
INTERSTATE 15
WHEREAS, the City if Temecula filed Planning Applications No. PA96-0024, PA96-
0025, and PA96-0026 in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Riverside
County Land Use and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference;
WHFREAS, Planning Applications No. PA96-0024, PA96-0025, and PA96-0026 were
processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law;
WH1ZREAS, the Planning Commission continued Planning Applications No. PA96-0024,
PA96-0025, and PA96-0026 on March 4, 1996, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by
law, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or in
opposition;
W/tEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Applications No. PA96-0024,
PA96-0025, and PA96-0026 on March 18, 1996, at a duly noticed public heating as prescribed
by law, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or in
opposition;
WHEREAS, at the public heating, upon hearing and considering all testimony and
arguments, if any, of all persons des'Lring to be heard, the Commission considered all facts relating
to Planning Applications No. PA96-0024, PA96-0025, and PA96-0026;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the above recitations are tree and correct.
Section 2. FAadia~ The Planning Commission, in recommending approval of Planning
Applications No. PA96-0024, PA96-0025 and PA96-0026 makes the following findings:
R:XSTAFFRPT~OTRP-R.EV.FC2 6/13/96 mf 6
1. Planning Application No. PA96-0024 (Revised Permit-Master Conditional
lJse Permit: PA94-0061), Planning Application No. PA96-0025 (Revised Permit-Westside
Specific Plan: PA95-0003), Planning Application No. PA96-0026 (Revised Permit-Tentative Tract
Map No. 28011: PA95-0004) are consistent with the City's General Plan. The findings made for
the original approval still apply for the revised project.
2. The project as designed and conditioned will not adversely affect the public
health or general welfare of the community. Mitigation measures originally approved for the
project will remain in effect for this project. Conditions of approval added to the project will
serve to further mitigate any impacts from this project.
3. The proposal will not have an adverse effect on surrounding property,
because the use does not represent a significant change to the present or previously planned land
use of the area.
4. The site is suitable to accommodate the proposed land use in terms of the
size and shape of the lot configuration, circulation patterns, access, and intensity of use due to the
fact that the proposed development complies with the standards of the City's General Plan,
Ordinance No. 460 and Ordinance No. 348.
Section 3. l~nvironmental Compliance. Planning Application No. PA95-0031
(Environmental Impact Report) was prepared for the Old Town Entertainment Project and was
certified by the City of Temecula City Council in July, 1995. According to Section 21166 of the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), no subsequent or supplemental environmental
impact report is required for the project unless one or more of the following events occurs:
substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the EIR;
substantial changes occur with respect to circumstance under which the project is being undertaken
which will require major revisions in the EIR; or, new information, which was not known at the
time of the EIR was certified and complete becomes available. None of these situations have
occurred; therefore, no further environmental analysis is required.
Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby
recommends approval of Planning Applications No. PA96-0024, PA96-0025 and PA96-0026
subject to the following conditions:
A. Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference and made a
part hereof.
R:~STAFFRI~OTRP-REV.FC'2 6/13/96 mf 7
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of March, 1996.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 18th day of March,
1996 by the following vote of the Commission:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
4 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: MILLER, SLAVEN SOLTYSIAK,
FAHEY
0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NONE
1 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: WEBSTER
SECRETARY
R:'~TAFFRPT'xOTRP-RI~V.PC~ 6/13/96 mf 8