HomeMy WebLinkAbout96_008 PC ResolutionPC RESOLUTION NO. 96-08
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING APPROVAL
OF PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA96-0027 (SPECIFIC
PLAN NO. 199 - ZONING AMENDMENT) ON PROPERTY
LOCATED NORTH OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD,
EAST OF MEADOWS PARKWAY, SOUTH OF LA SERENA
WAY, WEST OF BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD AND
KNOWN AS PLANNING AREAS 6, 10, 11, AND 12 OF
SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 199 (MARGARITA VILLAGE)
WHEREAS, Bramalea California, Inc., BCI/CCL Venture No. 1 and BCI/CCL Venture
No. 2 filed Planning Application No. PA96-0027 (Specific Plan No. 199 - Zoning Amendment)
in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Riverside County Land Use and
Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference;
WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PA96-0027 (Specific Plan No. 199 - Zoning
Amendment) was processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission continued Planning Application No. PA96-0027
(Specific Plan No. 199 - Zoning Amendment) on March 4, 1996, at a duly noticed public hearing
as prescribed by law, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in
support or in opposition;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. PA96-0027
(Specific Plan No. 199 - Zoning Amendment) on March 18, 1996, at a duly noticed public
hearing as prescribed by law, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either
in support or in opposition;
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and
arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, the Commission considered all facts relating
to Planning Application No. PA96-0027 (Specific Plan No. 199 - Zoning Amendment);
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
Section 2. EillflJ3gg.
A. The Planning Commission in recommending approval of Planning Application No.
PA96-0027 (Specific Plan No. 199 - Zoning Amendment), makes the following findings, to wit:
R:\STAFFRPTX27PA96.PC2 8/19/96 mf
1. Planning Application No. PA96-0027 (Specific Plan No. 199 - Zoning
Amendment), as proposed, is compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community.
2. Planning Application No. PA96-0027 (Specific Plan No. 199 - Zoning
Amendment) inconsistent with the City's General Plan, due to the fact that the subject request is
in substantial conformance with Specific Plan No. 199 - Margarita Village.
3. The project is compatible with surrounding land uses. The project consists
of an expansion to the maximum square footage of single-family residences in an area that is
comprised of a variety of sizes of single-family residences.
4. The proposal will not have an adverse effect on surrounding property,
because it does not represent a significant change to the planned land use of the area, due to the
fact that the proposed land use is consistent with the overall concept of Specific Plan No. 199.
5. The changes proposed in the approved Specific Plan are minor and do not
increase the impacts associated with the development or the overall intensity of the development
as analyzed in Environmental hnpact Report 202. The mitigation measures prepared for this
Environmental Impact Report (EIR) will be applied to this project.
Section 3. l~nvironmental Compliance. Environmental Impact Report No. 202 was
prepared for Specific Plan No. 199 and was certified by the County Board of Supervisors. It has
been eight (8) years since the environmental analysis was performed for this project. It is Staff's
opinion that due to the limited scope of the proposed Zoning Amendment, there will be no affect
on the previous analysis. According to Section 21166 of the California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA), no subsequent or supplemental environmental impact report is required for the
project unless one or more of the following events occurs: substantial changes are proposed in
the project which will require major revisions of the EIR; substantial changes occur with respect
to circumstance under which the project is being undertaken which will require major revisions
in the EIR; or, new information, which was not known at the time of the EIR was certified and
complete becomes available. None of these situations has occurred; therefore, no further
environmental analysis is required.
Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby
recommends approval of Planning Application No. PA96-0027, (Specific Plan No. 199 - Zoning
Amendment) on property located north of Rancho California Road, east of Meadows Parkway,
south of La Serena Way, and west of Butterfield Stage Road and known as Planning Areas 6, 10,
11, and 12 of Specific Plan No. 199 (Margarita Village) subject to the following conditions:
A. Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference and made a
part hereof.
R:[STAFFRPT~27PA96.PC2 8/16/96 mf
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of March, 1996.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 18th day of March,'
1996 by the following vote of the Commission:
AYES:
4 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: FAHEY, MILLER, SLAVEN,
SOLTYSIAK
NOES:
0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: 1 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: WEBSTER
DEBBIE UBNOSKE, SECRETARY
R:\STAFFRPT~27PA96.PC2 8/16/96 mf