HomeMy WebLinkAbout96_006 PC ResolutionPC RESOLUTION NO. 96-06
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA DELETING CONDITION OF
APPROVAL NO. 32 OF PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 95-
0003 (WESTSIDE SPECIFIC PLAN') PERTAINING TO
TIMING FOR THE RECORDATION OF A FINAL
SUBDIVISION MAP AND THE ISSUANCE OF A GRADING
PERMIT
WHEREAS, The City of Temecula filed Planning Application No. PA96-0026 (Revised
Permit) in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Riverside County Land Use
and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference;
WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PA96-0026 (Revised Permit) was processed in the
time and manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. PA96-0026
(Revised Permit) on March 4, 1996, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at
which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or in opposition;
WHEREAS, at the public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and
arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, the Commission considered all facts relating
to Planning Application No. PA96-0026 (Revised Permit);
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
Section 2. ~ The Planning Commission, in recommending approval of Planning
Application No. PA96-0026 (Revised Permit) makes the following findings:
1. Planning Application No. PA96-0026 (Revised Permit-Tentative Tract Map
No. 28011: PA95-0004) is consisteut witb the City's General Plan. The findings made for the
original approval still apply for the revised project,
2, The project as designed and conditioned will not adversely affect the public
health or general welfare of the community. Mitigation measures originally approved for the
project will remain in effect tbr this project. Conditions of approval added to the project will
serve to further mitigate any impacts from this project.
3. The proposal will not have an adverse effect on surrounding property,
because the use does not represent a significant change to the present or previously planned land
use of the area.
R:~STAFFRPT~OTRP-REV.I*C 8/19/96 vgw
4. The site is suitable to accommodate the proposed land use in terms of the
size and shape of the lot configuration, cimulation patterns, access, and intensity of use due to the
fact that the proposed development complies with the standards of the City's General Plan,
Ordinance No. 460 and Ordinance No. 348.
Section 3. l~nvironmental Compliance. Planning Application No. PA95-0031
(Environmental Impact Report) was prepared for the Old Town Entertainment Project and was
certified by the City of Temecula City Council in July, 1995. According to Section 21166 of the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), no subsequent or supplemental environmental
impact report is required for the project unless one or more of the following events occurs:'
substantial changes are proposed in tile project which will require major revisions of the EIR;
substantial changes occur with respect to circumstance under which the project is being undertaken
which will require major revisions in the EIR; or, new information, which was not known at the
time of the EIR was certified and complete becomes available. None of these situations have
occurred; therefore, no further environmental analysis is required.
Section 4. Conditions. That tile City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby
recommends approval of Planning Application No. PA96-0026 deleting Condition of Approval
No. 32 of Planning Application No. 95-0003 (Westside Specific Plan) pertaining to timing for the
recordation of a final subdivision map and tile issuance of a grading permit
Section 4. PASSED, APl>ROVED AND ADOPTED this 4th day of March, 1996.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that tile foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 4th day of March,
1996 by the following vote of tile Commission:
AYES: 5
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 0
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: MILLER, WEBSTER, SOLTYSIAK,
SLAVEN, FAHEY
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NONE
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NONE
DEBBIE UBNOSKE, SECRETARY
R:XSTAFFRPTXOTRP-REV.PC 8/19/96 vgw