Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout062602 PC AgendaIn compliance wth the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in thisI meet ng, p ease contact the office of the City Clerk (909) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure access b ty to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II] AGENDA TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE June 26, 2002 - 6:00 P.M. Next in Order: Resolution: No. 2002-016 CALL TO ORDER Flag Salute: Roll Call: Commissioner Guerriero Guerriero, Mathewson, Olhasso, Telesio and Chairman Chiniaeff PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Commission on items that are listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Commission about an item not on the Agenda, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Commission Secretary. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the Commission Secretary prior to the Commission addressing that item. There is a three (3) minute time limit for individual speakers. CONSENT CALENDAR NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members of the Planning Commission request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. 1 Aqenda RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the Agenda of June 26, 2002 R:~PLANCOMM~Age ndas~2002\06-26-02.doc 1 2 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve Minutes from May 15, 2002 2.2 Approve Minutes from June 5, 2002 (will be delivered under separate cover) 3 Director's Hearin.q Case Update RECOMMENDATIQN: 3.1 Approve the Director's Hearing Case Update COMMISSION BUSINESS PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the Commission Secretary at, or prior to, the public hearing. Continued from June 5~ 2002 4 Planninq Application No. 01-0307 (Development Plan}- Matthew Harris RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Adopt a Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. 01-0307 pursuant to Section 15332 of the California Environmental Quality Act; 4.2 Adopt a Resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2002-__ A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 01-0307, DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT, ESTABLISH AND OPERATE A 24,t70 INDUSTRIAL/ WAREHOUSE BUILDING ON t.50 VACANT ACRES. GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF ZEVO DRIVE, WEST OF DIAZ ROAD KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 909-360-034 Newltems 5 Piann n.q Application No. 02-0284 (Substantial Conformance) - Michael McCoy RECOMMENDATION: R:~PLANCOMM~Agend as~2002\06-26-02.doc 2 7 5.1 Adopt a Resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2002-._ A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 02-0284, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR A SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE TO PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 0t -0385, WHICH REQUESTS ELIMINATING THE APPROVED TENANT ENTRANCE CANOPIES ALONG THE FRONT ELEVATION OF BUILDING "A" AND SUBSTITUTING THEM FOR LARGE ACCENT TREES LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF WINCHESTER ROAD AT THE TERMINUS OF COLT COURT AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 909-360-025 6 Plannin,q Application No. 02-0036 - Rick Rush RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Adopt a Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. 02-0036 pursuant to Section 15332 of the California Environmental Quality Act; 6.2 Adopt a Resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2002-__ A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 02-0036, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT, ESTABLISH AND OPERATE A 36,000 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE BUILDING ON 3.01 VACANT ACRES, GENERALLY LOCATED ON RIDGEGATE DRIVE AND WEST OF RIDGE PARK DRIVE KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 940-310-040 Plann n.q App cat on No. 01-0648 (Development Plan) - Thomas Thornsley RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Adopt a Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. 01-0648 (Development Plan) based on the Determination of Consistency with a project for which an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was previously certified pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 - Subsequent EIR's and Negative Declarations. 7.2 Adopt a Resolution entitled: R:~PLANCOMM~Agendas~OO2\06-26-O2.doc 3 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 0'1-0648, DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT, ESTABLISH AND OPERATE TWO, THREE-STORY BUILDINGS CONSISTING OF 102 DWELLING UNITS AS AN EXPANSION TO THE FOUNTAINS AT TEMECULA SENIOR APARTMENT COMMUNITY ON A 3.4 ACRE SITE KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 920-090-006. 8 Plannin.q Application No. 02-0148 (Development Plan) -Thomas Thornsle¥ RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 Adopt a Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. 02-0148 (Development Plan) based on the Determination of Consistency with a project for which an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was previously certified pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 - Subsequent EIR's and Negative Declarations. 8.2 Adopt a Resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 02-0148 - A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF A SINGLE STORY OFFICE BUILDING TOTALING 7,986 SQUARE FEET ON .988 ACRES WITHIN THE OVERLAND CORPORATE CENTER, LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF OVERLAND DRIVE AND MARGARITA ROAD, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. 92'1-090-071. 9 Plannin,q Application No. 02-0120 (Development Plan) - Rolfe Preisendanz 9.1 Adopt a Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. 02-0120 (Development Plan) based on the Determination of Consistency with a project for which an Environmental~ Impact Report (EIR) was previously certified pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 - Subsequent EIR's and Negative Declarations. 9.2 Adopt a Resolution entitled: · R:~LANCOMM~Agendas~2002~06-26-02.doc 4 PC RESOLUTION NO. 02- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 02-0120 - A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION AND ESTABLISHMENT OF TVVO MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDINGS ON t.5 ACRES WITH BUILDING "A" HAVING 3,500 SQUARE FEET AND BUILDING "B" HAVING 11,100 SQUARE FEET, TOTALING 14,600 SQUARE FEET, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF MARGARITA ROAD AND NORTH GENERAL KEARNY ROAD, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. APN 921-810-008. COMMISSIONER'S REPORTS PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT ADJOURNMENT Next meeting: July 17, 2002 - Council Chambers 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, CA 92590 R:~PLANCOMM~Agendas~002\O6-26-O2.doc 5 ITEM #2 May 15, 2002 Minutes MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 15, 2002 CALL TO ORDER The City of Temecula Planning Commission convened in a regular meeting at 6:00 P.M., on Wednesday, May 15, 2002, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. ALLEGIANCE The audience was led in the Flag salute by Chairman Chiniaeff. ROLLCALL Present: Commissioners Guerriero, Mathewson, OIhasso, Telesio, and Chairman Chiniaeff. Absent: None. Also Present: Director of Planning Ubnoske, Assistant City Attorney Curley, Deputy Director of Public Works Parks, Senior Planner Hazen, Senior Planner Hogan, Associate Planner Harris, Associate Planner Thornsley, and Minute Clerk Hansen. PUBLIC COMMENTS No comments. CONSENT CALENDAR I Aqenda RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the Agenda of May 15, 2002. 2 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve Minutes from April 24, 2002. 2.2 Approve Minutes from May 1, 2002. Commissioner Mathewson relayed that on page 3 of the May 1, 2002 minutes, in the motion, it indicated that he had made and seconded the motion, recommending that this portion of the minutes be corrected. MOTION: Commissioner Guerriero moved to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1-2 (Item 2.2, as revised.) The motion was seconded by Commissioner Olhasso and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Commissioner Telesio who abstained from Item No. 2.1. COMMISSION BUSINESS 3 Capital Improvements Proqram (CIP) Regarding the proposed Capital Improvements Program (CIP) for fiscal years 2003- 2007, the Planning Commission offered the following recommendations:, With respect to the Butterfield Stage Road Extension Beltway Project [as denoted on pages 35 and 36 of the ClP Summary (Draft Extract) (per agenda material)], Commissioner Guerriero recommended that the priority level of this item be changed from Priority III to a minimum Priority II, and preferably to Priority I. With respect to the Diaz Road Widening Project from Winchester Road to Rancho California Road (as denoted on pages 43 and 44), Commissioner Guerdero recommended that the priority level of this item be changed from a Pdority III to a minimum Priority II, and preferably to Priodty I. With respect to the Rainbow Canyon Road Widening Project from Pala Road to the City limit (as denoted on pages 83 and 84), Commissioner Guerriero recommended that the priority level of this item be changed from a Priority III to Priority II. With respect to the State Route 79 (South) Medians Project (as denoted on pages 97 and 98), Commissioner Olhasso recommended that the pdority level of this item be changed from a Priority II to Priority I, citing accidents she has witnessed on this roadway. With respect to the Parks and Recreation Master Plan Update Project (as denoted on pages 193 and 194), Commissioner Mathewson recommended that the pdority level of this item be changed from Priority IV to Priority I1. With respect to the Meadowview North City Cimulation Study (as denoted on pages 69 and 70), Commissioner Telesio recommended that the priodty level of ' this item be changed from Priority III to a minimum Priority II due to the numerous alternate proposals and projects that are being delayed until this study is complete. MOTION: Commissioner Guerriero moved to recommend that the City Council approve the proposed Capital Improvement Program (ClP) for fiscal years 2003-2007 with the above-mentioned revisions. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Olhasso and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS 4 Planninq Application No. 01-0307 (Development Plan) - Matthew Harris, Associato Planner Development plan to construct, establish and operate a 24,170 sq. fl. industrial warehouse building on 1.50 vacant acres. Generally located on the south side of Zevo Drive, west of Diaz Road know as Assessor's Parcel No. 909-360.034. RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Staff recommends that the Planning Commission not approve the project and continue off-calendar for redesign. Associate Planner Harris provided a project overview (of record), noting that when this item was before the Planning Commission on Apdl 3, 2002, the Commission had expressed concerns regarding the lack of building articulation, the box-like and stark appearance of the building, the need for additional windows, the minimal ornamentation, recommending that the al~plicant hire a licensed architect in order to revise the plans, and the item was continued in order for the applicant to address these issues; with respect to the latest proposal, relayed that sandblasted panels have been added to the north and east sides of the buildings, additional windows have been added, painted knock-out panels have been added to simulate windows, scoring has been added, and a fifteen foot (15') tall by twenty-two foot (22') wide entry panel has been proposed which would project out approximately six point five feet (6.5') from the building; advised that after review of the modifications, it was staff's opinion that the revisions do not comply with the Industrial Design Standards in the Design Guidelines, in particular that the proposal does not comply with significant building indentations, that the building floorplan has not been significantly revised, that the added side panels provide insufficient articulation, that the design lacked a variety of building form and additional interest, that the plan lacked varied siding materials, that the sandblasted panels only offered minimum depth (being less that one foot in depth off the building face), that the gray color treatment of the concrete may conflict with the building colors, and that the square-shaped and rectangular-shaped architectural features amplify the box-like appearance; and advised that in light of the Permit Streamlining Act that mandates that the application be approved or denied by May 19, 2002, which was not feasible, it was staff's recommendation that the applicant consent to a one-time, 90-day processing extension if no approval or denial action was taken at this meeting. For clarification, Assistant City Attorney Curley noted that if the Planning Commission opted to take action on this item tonight, it would be staffs recommendation that the Planning Commission articulate the findings for the action which staff would subsequently memorialize in a resolution; and R:PlanCemm/rninutes~51502 3 additionally recommended that in lieu of continuing this time off-calendar if the Planning Commission determined to continue the matter, that the item be continued to a date certain due to the critical timing element. In response to Chairman Chiniaeff, Associate Planner Harris noted that the project data was submitted by the applicant just prior to Planning Commission distribution and that staff has not had the opportunity to further direct the applicant on the current plan; for Commissioner Mathewson, provided additional information regarding the proposed entry, confirming that the trelliswork has been deleted from the plan; and confirmed that the inset treatment has been replaced with a scored panel, additionally confirming that a larger window treatment was now being proposed. Mr. Walt Allen, architect representing the applicant, noted that he has been working on the redesign of this proposal since the project was continued by the Planning Commission; opined that staff's recommendations were in part due to the lack of visual aids, and that there was an incomplete understanding of the design intent; via overheads, provided additional information regarding the various elements involved in designing a project, inclusive of setback requirements, consideration of the existing buildings, parking provisions, traffic flow, and the determination of the size and shape needed for the proposed building; presented a site analysis, noting the existing adjacent uses and setbacks, the six-foot yard wall, and the screened view of the project site due to the existing structures; relayed the rationale for the project layout; noted the plan to include warehouse provisions as well as office space for this particular proposal; advised that the square-shaped articulations were intentional to create consistency in design elements (between the office portion of the project with the square-shaped windows, and the warehouse portion of the project with the square-shaped knock-out panels); relayed that the focal point of the project was the entry; specified the main visual impact from the street, and the principal access node; and advised that the enhanced landscape plan would aid in softening the building's impacts; and introduced Mr. Vince Didonato, the applicant's landscape architect. Via overheads, Mr. Didonato, representing the applicant, provided additional information regarding the revised entry plan with the grid pattern, which was consistent with the grid pattern on the building with a plaza-type setting; relayed the landscape plan; and for Commissioner Mathewson, provided additional information regarding the entry treatment. In conclusion, Mr. Allen noted the applicant's disagreement with staff's findings, opining that this particular proposal represents a logical site design, as well as provision of an enhanced entry, and excellent form concepts expressed, as afforded by the functional elements of the building; noted the avoidance of trendy architectural elements; for Commissioner Mathewson, via a sample material board, relayed that there was a proposed clear gloss sealer for the sandblasted treatment which would render a browner colored concrete; for Chairman Chiniaeff, specified the r ' ' p oject s elements which provided dimensional relief; and for Commissioner Telesio, confirmed that the sealant would prevent the sandblasted treatment from appearing gray. R:PlanCornnl/minutes/051502 4 Commenting on the project, Chairman Chiniaeff provided additional information regarding the articulated elements, which provided dimension; and specified the portions of the project, which would be screened due to the adjacent uses. For Chairman Chiniaeff, Mr. Didonato specified the proposed location of the 24- inch box pine trees. In response to Chairman Chiniaeff, Mr. Allen noted the applicant's willingness to have the project continued. Noting the need for additional information regarding the project, Commissioner Guerriero relayed his support of a continuance, advising that he would desire for the applicant to provide a landscape plan. Advising that since the revised plans were submitted last-minute, Commissioner Mathewson noted that the applicant's timing had not provided staff an adequate review process; with respect to the proposed added panels, noted that if there was a 7.5 inch relief from the existing panels, this particular element would provide more than adequate articulation, relaying that he was pleased with the height variations created with the added panels; noted concern regarding the coloring of the knock-out panels, recommending that this element be replaced with windows; and advised that he preferred the originally proposed entry treatment. Commissioner OIhasso noted he'r concurrence with the previous comments, including the recommendation to continue this item. Relaying appreciation for the clarification the applicant's representative offered dudng his presentation, Commissioner Telesio relayed that he would desire to have additional information regarding the knock-out panels; noted that in his opinion, the building did not appear stark, relaying that while it was important that the project was visually pleasing, that this warehouse-type building additionally needed to be functional; concurred with the need to continue this item; noted hopes that there were intermediate conversations from staff to the applicant to provide direction, recommending that the coordination of these discussions be improved; and opined that a good project could be designed with the use of two or three vaded materials. Referencing the adjacent existing uses, Chairman Chiniaeff relayed that this particular proposal was a vast improvement; opined that staff should be relaying specific comments to the applicant regarding what was expected; recommended that the project be modified, as follows: that additional articulation be added along the roofline (consistent with the main entrance and the north elevation's elements), and that storefront glass be added to the knock-out panels (noting that it may not be necessary to install the glass down the entire elevation); relayed his preference for the revised entry design; and with respect to the element which appeared to be a concrete tilt-up wall with insets, recommended that this be clarified on the submittals and that the materials be indicated. Regarding the Permit Streamlining Act timing constraints, Assistant City Attorney Curley queried whether the applicant was willing to consent to the 90-day processing extension (clarifying that per CEQA requirements, only one request for an extension could be granted, ergo the rationale for the 90-day request). In response to Assistant City Attorney Curley, Mr. Vince Maganuco, representing the applicant, noted the applicant's agreement to the request for a 90-day process extension, Assistant City Attorney Curley noting that this agreement would be followed up with a letter confirming the applicant's agreement. Expressing appreciation to Chairman Chiniaeff, Mr. Didonato requested that the Planning Commission provide specific input, relaying that it was an ongoing problem whereby staff had attempted to provide information to the applicant regarding the Planning Commission's expectation level; and with respect to the number of materials utilized in this project, queried whether a tilt-up building with exposed aggregate and varied textures and colors was acceptable to the Planning Commission, or whether it was necessary to add a brick or rock material. Commissioner Guerriero confirmed that it was the Planning Commission's desire to raise the bar with respect to design standards, aiming for more dynamic architectural designs and moving away from the 60's and 70's architectural designs. Reiterating his specific recommendations in response to Mr. Didonato's comments, Commissioner Mathewson recommended that the knock-out panels not be painted, and that he concurred with Chairman Chiniaeff's comments regarding adding additional window treatments; and reiterated his concern regarding the entry treatment, as well as his concern regarding the colorization of the concrete panels, querying the final appearance of the concrete with the sealant. Offering his opinion, Commissioner Telesio noted that his expectation level regarding design was impacted by the location of the site, advising that if this project was located on Rancho California Road or Ynez Road he would expect a higher level of design than a warehouse-type project on Zevo Drive, and while noting his desire to have a higher level of designed projects in the City of Temecula, relayed that this project's design plan superceded the existing buildings adjacent to this proposed project. For informational purposes, Commissioner Olhasso recommended that design samples from the Cities of Rancho Santa Margarita, Rancho Cucamonga, and certain areas of Ontario be reviewed by the Planning Commission, noting staff's efforts to provide photographs of design styles in order to receive input from the Planning Commission regarding acceptable design standards. MOTION: Commissioner Olhasso moved to continue this item to the June 5, 2002, Planning Commission meeting. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Telesio and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. 5 plann n.q Application No. 01-0324 (Conditional Use Permit) - Don Hazen, Senio, Planner A Conditional Use Perm/t/Development Plan to construct and operate a golfing educational facility with a 10,000 sq. ft. classroom building, a 3,000 sq. ft. commercial pro shop, and a nine-hole public golf course with a 40 tee driving range, and the relocation of a caretaker's residence on a 22-acre site. RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Staff recommends the project be continued off-calendar at the applicant's request, because they are developing a revised lighting plan for the facility. (See attached documentation) Commissioner Telesio advised that he would be abstaining from this issue, and therefore left the dais. Senior Planner Hazen relayed that the applicant has requested a continuance regarding this item in order for the applicant to revise the lighting plan associated with this project, advising that it was his understanding that there were individuals present desiring to speak about the project. At this time Chairman Chiniaeff opened the public hearing. Mr. Richard Dierking, 42889 Via Alhama, relayed his concern with the evening lighting associated with this project which would create a significant negative impact, additionally noting that the noticing did not mention the proposed night lighting, opining that the description in the notice was inadequate, ergo the surrounding residents have not been given sufficient information, confirming that per discussions with his neighbors the residents were not aware of the proposed night lighting; relayed that one of the on-site notices was in the dirt for the past week;.and noted that he would not be opposed to this project if there were explicit requirements regarding the lighting, reCOmmending that the lighting be limited to two hours after sunset. Mr. Edward Hubler, 41815 Green Tree Road, relayed that he purchased his home based on the assumption that the proximate greenbelt would be maintained; noted that he was not opposed to the development of a golf college, but the golf course, the lighted driving range, and the natural habitat being disturbed at this site in which he has viewed animals (i.e., coyotes, owls, etc.) residing for years. For Chairman Chiniaeff, Director of Planning Ubnoske relayed that since this item will be continued off calendar, the project will be re-noticed; and in response to Mr. Dierking, noted that it was helpful if residents telephoned the City when they were aware of notices that had fallen down, so that staff could correct the matter. For informational purposes regarding the scope of notice, Assistant City Attorney Cudey advised that although State Law only required one form of notice, the City of Temecula posts all three forms. For Commissioner Mathewson, Senior Planner Hazen relayed that when the noticing is next posted for this project, staff will make a point to include information regarding the lighting. MOTION: Commissioner Mathewson moved to continue this item off-calendar. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Guerriero and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Commissioner Telesio who abstained. 6 Planninq Application No. 01-0521 (Conditional Use Permit/Development Plan) - Rick Rush RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Adopt a Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. 01-0521 pumuant to Section 15332 of the California Environmental Quality Act; 6.2 Adopt a Resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2002-0t3 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 61-0521, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT, ESTABLISH AND OPERATE A 55,906 SQUARE FOOT TWO-STORY SELF-STORAGE FACILITY ON 3.47 VACANT ACRES, GENERALLY LOCATED ON PALA ROAD NORTH OF LOMA UNDA ROAD AND SOUTH OF HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 961-0t0-010 Associate Planner Thornsley provided an overview of the project plan (per agenda material), highlighting the access, the parking, the site layout, the thirty percent (30%) landscaping plan, the setbacks, the architectural design plan, advising that staff was pleased with this particular proposal; relayed the following modification: that Condition No. 84 (regarding the requirement for an easement for public trials) be revised to indicate after the phrase "shall be shown," the following: and recorded along the Jedediah Smith Road right-of-way, noting that this condition should, be placed under the heading Prior to the Issuance of Building Permits; and commended the applicant's amhitect for his diligent work associated with the project. For Commissioner Mathewson, Director of Planning Ubnoske clarified that the plantings indicated on the landscape plan would be the actual installations and not those pictured on the rendering, Associate Planner Thomsley providing additional specifications regarding the plantings. Mr. Ariel Valli, amhitect representing the applicant, for Commissioner Olhasso, relayed that the project included the proposal of two types of fencing, as follows: 1) a solid block wall, and 1) wrought iron fencing, specifying the proposed location of each. R:FlanComnYrninutes/051502 8 After additional discussion, Senior Planner Hazen recommended that the off-site improvements not be part of the action taken on this project. In response, Mr. Valli relayed that it would be the applicant's desire for the applicant to work with staff to provide a continued treatment through this project and the parcel to the north in order to create a consistent appearance. For Chairman Chiniaeff, Deputy Director of Public Works Parks specified the location of the open drainage channel; and confirmed that there was adequate right-of-way to provide for the denoted facilities. MOTION: Commissioner Olhasso moved to close the public hearing; and to approve staff's recommendation, subject to the following modifications: Add- That Condition No. 84 be revised, adding the following language after the phrase "shall be shown:" and recorded along the Jedediah Smith Road #ght-of-way, and that this condition be placed under the heading Pdor to the Issuance of Building Permits; and That a condition be added stating that the applicant would work with staff regarding improvements on the adjacent site (i.e., demolition, and the installation of a block wall.) The motion was seconded by Commissioner Guerriero and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. COMMISSIONER'S REPORTS No additional comments. PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT With respect to architectural standards for proposed projects, Director of Planning Ubnoske requested clarification from the Planning Commission, advising that the Design Guidelines do not vary standards w th res ect to Ioc-.a~tion, noting that Planning staff was struggling regarding the ex;e~ctation level of design; provided additional information regarding Agenda Item No. 4, clarifying that staff had not reviewed the data which was submitted at a late date and presented at tonight's meeting (Senior Planner Hazen clarifying that the day after the Planning Commission meeting when the project was continued staff had met with the applicant recommending that conceptual sketches be provided to staff, advising that submittals were not provided and that staff had viewed many aspects of the project for the first time yesterday aftemoon, and at tonight's hearing): and noted that staff cannot force an architect to make changes and that it would not be appropriate to place staff in the position of designing buildings. Noting his frustration, Commissioner Guerdero relayed that although the Planning Commission has a desire to raise the bar regarding design standards, the applicants' representatives, some of whom have been working in the City for years, assume that lesser standards can be submitted and approved, querying where the applicants' representatives would receive the message (that the bar has been raised) from the Planning Commission or staff. Director of Planning Ubnoske noted that staff worked with applicants and their representatives, advising that it was not staff's desire to ever bring forward projects which would be recommended for denial; and relayed that if the applicants were not agreeable to making improvements based on staff's conception of what the Planning Commission expected, staff could bring those items forward with a recommendation for denial based on inconsistency with the Design Guidelines. Commissioner Guerriero relayed that it was not the Planning Commission's desire to promulgate a message of anti-business or anti-growth, querying the avenue for relaying that message that the bar has been raised with respect to design standards. Director of Planning Ubnoske relayed that if the Planning Commission was consistent in its standards with respect to projects proposed with lower design standards, recommending denial or a continuance for the applicant to revise the design plan, the word would get out to the community and projects would begin to come in at a higher level. Chairman Chiniaeff commented that no one on the Commission would be reluctant to not support a project proposing lower design standards. Commissioner Olhasso relayed that there was a difference between being business-friendly and processing plans too quickly, clarifying that she was a proponent of maintaining higher design standards. Providing additional information, Assistant City Attorney Curley relayed that if the Planning Commission codified its findings with respect to design standards as it relates to the Design Guidelines, staff would have something more substantial to provide applicants with respect to raising the board regarding design standards. Chairman Chiniaeff recommended that the Design Guidelines include photographs of samples of architecture that the Planning Commission was seeking, as this would provide applicants with a clearer picture of what was expected. In response, Director of Planning Ubnoske relayed that monies were set-aside in the budget to hire a consultant to update the Design Guidelines. Commissioner Telesio advised that the applicants were not receiving the message that the design standards have been raised, as they relay to the Planning Commission that the issue was a matter of interpretation of the Design Guidelines. For Commissioner Telesio, Director of Planning Ubnoske relayed that when applicants noted that the adjacent uses to their proposed project had lower design standards, staff clarifies to the applicant that this has nO bearing on current design standards for projects. For Commissioner Mathewson, Director of Planning Ubnoske relayed that although the color renderings on projects were not a requirement, staff would attempt to provide direction that the landscape plans should be accurately reflected if renderings were provided. In response to Commission comments, Assistant City Attorney Curley confirmed that when Planning Commissioners met with applicants on an individual basis, it was appropriate to absorb information but not to provide direction per the Brown Act regulations, Director of Planning Ubnoske confirming that it would be inappropriate for a Planning Commissioner to serve on an Architectural Committee associated with a future project, After additional discussion, it was the consensus of the Planning Commission to hold three Planning Commission meetings in June, on June 5th, June 19th, and the 26th, the 19th being a Joint City Council/Planning Commission meeting. ADJOURNMENT At 7:57 P.M. Chairman Chiniaeff formally adjourned this meeting to the next re,qular meetinq to be held on Wednesday, June 5, 2002 at 6:00 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula. Dennis W. Chiniaeff, Chairman Debbie Ubnoske, Director of Planning June 5, 2002 Minutes (will be provided under separate cover) ITEM #3 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OFTEMECULA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENTDEPARTMENT PLANNING DIVISION MEMORANDUM Planning Commission Debbie Ubnoske, Director of Planning June 26, 2002 Director's Hearing Case Update Planning Director's Agenda items for April and May 2002 April4, 2002 PA02-0121 Request for approval for off-site sales of Health Zone Approved beer and wine. Natural Food April 4, 2002 PA02-0028 A Minor Conditional Use Permit to operate Southwest Approved chumh services in an existing building Revival located at 28721 Old Town Front Street. Center April 11, 2002 PA01-0620 Product Review application for two Ron & Phyllis Approved detached single-family homes totaling Hungate 2,709 & 2,655 square feet respectively. May 2, 2002 PA01-0019 Minor Conditional Use Permitapplication to Verizon Approved collocate a wireless PCS antenna on an Wireless c/o existing monopine structure, with a new 02 Wireless unmanned wireless communications Solutions equipment substation at the monopine base. May30, 2002 PA01-0601 Planning Application for a Cingular Compass Denied Unmanned Wireless Telecommunication Telecom Facility consisting of replacing two existing Services wood poles with two identical metal poles (painting a wood grain finish to match existing poles) and a 10'x20' BTS equipment enclosure. The proposed metal poles will internally house 6 antennas. Attachments: 1. Action Agendas - Blue Page 2 R:~D [RH EAR,VI EM O~2002',May 2002.memo.doc ATTACHMENT NO. 1 ACTION AGENDAS R:~D IRHEAR98 EM O~2002'xMay 2002.memo.doc 2 ACTION AGENDA TEMECULA DIRECTOR'S HEARING REGULAR MEETING April 4, 2002 1:30 PM TEMECULA CITY HALL MAIN CONFERENCE ROOM 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 CALL TO ORDER: Don Hazen, Senior Planner PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address to the Planning Manager on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Senior Planner about an item not listed on the Agenda, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Senior Planner. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address. For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the Senior Planner before that item is heard. There is a three (3) minute time limit for individual speakers. Item No. 1: Case No: Applicant: Location: Proposal: Environmental Action: Case Planner: ACTION: PA02-0121 Health Zone Minor Conditional Use Permit Health Zone Natural Foods, LLC The Commons at Temecula - 40458 Winchester Road, Temecula, CA 92591 Request for approval for off-site sales of beer and wine This project is categorically exempt as previously reviewed under the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan SP-263 Environmental Impact Report Michael McCoy APPROVED Item No. 2: Case No: Applicant: Location: Proposal: Environmental Action: Case Planner: ACTION: PA02-0028 Minor Conditional Use Permit Southwest Revival Center Located at 28721 Old Town Front Street (Existing Stampede Building) A Minor Conditional Use Permit to operate church services in a existing building located at 28721 Old Town Front Street; Submitted by Southwest Revival Center This project is exempt from CEQA review due to Class 1 Categorical Exemption 15301 (Existing Facilities) Rick Rush, Project Planner APPROVED P:~P LAN N IN G~D IRHBARX2002\0~04-02 AGENDA_doc ACTION AGENDA TEMECULA DIRECTOR'S HEARING REGULAR MEETING April 11,2002 1:30 PM TEMECULA CITY HALL MAIN CONFERENCE ROOM 43200 Business Perk Drive Temecula, CA 92590 CALL TO ORDER: Don Hazen, Senior Planner PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address to the Planning Manager on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Senior Planner about an item not listed on the Agenda, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Senior Planner. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address. For all other agenda items a "Request to Spe~k" form must be filed with the Senior Planner before that item is heard. There is a three (3) minute time limit for individual speakers. Item No. 1: Case No: Applicant: Location: Proposal: Environmental Action: Case Planner: ACTION: Planning Application No. PA01-0620 (Development Plans for Product Review) Ron & Phyllis Hungate Southwest corner of Sierra Madre Drive and North General Kearney Road (APN No. 920-213-030). Product Review application for two detached single-family homes totaling 2,709 & 2,655 square feet respectively. Notice of Exemption per California Environmental Quality Act Article 19 Categorical Exemptions Section 15332 Class 32 In-fill Development Projects. Matthew Harris APPROVED P:~PLAN NIN G~DIP. HF~.R~2002k04-114i2 AGENDA..doc ACTION AGENDA ~'~ TEMECULA DIRECTOR'S HEARING REGULAR MEETING May 2, 2002 1:30 PM TEMECULA CITY HALL MAIN CONFERENCE ROOM 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 CALL TO ORDER: Don Hazen, Senior Planner PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address to the Planning Manager on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes each..If you desire to speak to the Senior Planner about an item net listed on the Agenda, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Senior Planner. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address. For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the Senior Planner before that item is heard. There is a three (3) minute time limit for individual speakers. Item No. 1: Case No: Applicant: Location: Proposal: Assessor's Pamel No: Environmental Action: Case Planner: ACTION: Planning Application PA01-0019 (MCUP) Verizon Wireless c/o 02 Wireless Solutions Northerly of Rancho California Road, easterly of Meadows Parkway at the Rancho California Water District water tank in the Chardonnay Hills community. Minor Conditional Use Permit application to colocate a wireless PCS antenna on an existing monopine structure, with a new unmanned wireless communications equipment substation at the monopine base. 953-390-002 Staff has deemed the project categorically exempt from CEQA per Sections 15301 (Existing Facilities) Michael McCoy APPROVED p:~PLAN NIN(:~DIEHI:AE~002\05 -02-02 ACTION AGENDA,doc 1 ACTION AGENDA TEMECULA DIRECTOR'S HEARING REGULAR MEETING May 9, 2002 1:30 PM TEMECULA CITY HALL MAIN CONFERENCE ROOM 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 CALL TO ORDER: Don Hazen, Senior Planner PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address to the Planning Manager on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Senior Planner about an item not Jisted on the Agenda, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed"~h the Senior Planner. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address. For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the Senior Planner before that item is heard. There is a three (3) minute time limit for individual speakers. Item No. 1: Case No: Applicant: ' Location: Proposal: Environmental Action: Case Planner! ACTION: Planning Application PA01-0601 Compass Telecom Services Located on the northeast corner of Rancho California Road and Margarita Road in the Temeku Hills Golf Course. Planning Application for a Cingular Unmanned Wireless Telecommunication Facility consisting of replacing two existing wood poles with two identical metal poles (painted a wood grain finish to match existing poles) and a 10' x 20' BTS equipment enclosure. The proposed metal poles will internally house 6 antennas. Staff has deemed the project categorically exempt from CEQA per Sections 15301 (Existing Facilities) Rolfe Preisendanz CONTINUED TO MAY 30, 2002. P:~PLANNINGkDIRHEARk2002\05-09-02 ACTION AGENDA.doc 1 ACTION AGENDA TEMECULADIRECTOR'S HEARING REGULAR MEETING May30,20021:30PM TEMECULA CITY HALL MAIN CONFERENCE ROOM 43200 Business Park Drive Temecule, CA 92590 CALL TO ORDER: Don Hazen, Senior Planner PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address to the Planning Manager on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Senior Planner about an item not listed on the Agenda, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Senior Planner. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address. For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the Senior Planner before that item is heard. There is a three (3) minute time limit for individual speakers. Item No. 1: Case No: Applicant: Location: Proposal: Environmental Action: Case Planner: ACTION: Planning Application PA01-0601 Compass Telecom Services Located on the northeast corner of Rancho California Road and Margarita Road in the Temeku Hills Golf Coume. Planning Application for a Cingular Unmanned Wireless Telecommunication Facility consisting of replacing two existing wood poles with two identical metal poles (painted a wood grain finish to match existing poles) and a 10' x 20' BTS equipment enclosure. The proposed metal poles will intemally house 6 antennas. (Continued from the May 9, 2002, meeting) Staff has deemed the project categorically exempt from CEQA per Sections 15301 (Existing Facilities) Rolfe Preisendanz DENIED P:~PLANNING~D~,HBAR~2002\05-30-02 ACTION AGENDA.doc 1 ITEM #4 STAFF REPORT- PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION June 25, 2002 Planning Application No. 01-0307 (Development Plan) Prepared By: Matthew Harris, Associate Planner ADOPT a Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. 01-0307 (Development Plan) pursuant to Section 15332 of the California Environmental Quality Act; ADOPT a Resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 01- 0307, DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT, ESTABLISH AND OPERATE A 24,170 INDUSTRIAL/WAREHOUSE BUILDING ON 1.50 VACANT ACRES. GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF ZEVO DRIVE, WEST OF DIAZ ROAD KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 909-360-034 APPLICATION INFORMATION APPLICANT: PROPOSAL: LOCATION: EXISTING ZONING: SURROUNDING ZONING: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: EXISTING LAND USE: SURROUNDING LAND USES: Don Mosco Builders A proposal to design, construct and operate a 24,170 square foot industrial/warehouse building South side of Zevo Drive, approximately 2,700 feet west of Diaz Road Light Industrial (LI) North: Light Industrial (LI) South: Light Industrial (LI) East: Light Industrial (LI) West: Light Industrial (LI) Business Park (BP) Vacant North: Vacant South: Vacant/Industrial Building East: Warehouse Building West: Industrial Building PROJECT STATISTICS (DEVELOPMENT PLAN) Lot area (net): Building square footage: Building height: Landscaped area: Parking required: 1.50 Acres 24,170 square feet 30'-0' 13,050 square feet (20%) 41 vehicular, 2 handicapped, 2 bicycle, and 1 motomycle Parking provided: 42 vehicular, 2 handicapped, 2 bicycle, and I motomycle Lot coverage/FAR: 35%/.38 BACKGROUND This application was continued from the April 3rd Planning Commission meeting after the Commission identified several building architecture issues. Modified building elevations were subsequently reviewed by the Commission on May 15, 2002. At that meeting, the Commission identified a few additional amhitectural issues and continued the item again to May 5, 2002. The project amhitect required additional time to finalize plans that are now complete. The following is a summary of the concerns that were expressed by the Planning Commissioners. · Proposed knockout panels should be replaced with windows. · More articulation is needed along the building parapet. · More building articulation is needed. · The projecting main entry panel does not provide sufficient character or visual interest. Since the May 15, 2002 meeting, the architect and staff met once to discuss the proposed changes to the architecture. Staff believes the additional architectural modifications serve to address the Commission's above noted issues. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/ANALYSIS Additional Windows All the square 5'x5' painted knockout panels originally proposed by the architect along the east and west elevations have been replaced with glass. Parapet Articulation The architect has added one foot of height to the building parapet along the east side of the building between the main entry panel and the six-foot tall screen wall. This height increase serves to provide a two-foot differentiation between parapet panels thereby increasing articulation. Building Articulation A four-foot eight-inch wall inset has been added along the north side of the building. The inset serves to further articulate this elevation, which fronts on the street. Building Entry While the architect has not modified the main building entrance design, the landscape architect has changed the landscaping and flatwork in front of the entrance. Staff believes the changes serve to formalize the entrance and enhance its visual interest. CONCLUSlON/RECOMM ENDATION Staff has determined that the proposed project complies with all applicable development standards. In addition, with the incorporation of the above referenced modifications, staff believes the project now conforms to all applicable Industrial Design Guidelines. Staff recommends approval of the Development Plan with the attached conditions of approval. FINDINGS Development Plan (Section 17.05.010F) 1. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan and with all applicable requirements of state law and other City ordinances. The plan to develop a 24,170 square foot warehouse/industrial building is consistent with the Light industrial (LI) policies and development regulations. The proposed plan incorporates architectural and landscape R:~) Px2001\01~)307 mosco lot 34~Staff Report for Continuance 2.doc 2 designs, which will achieve the City's General Plan Community Design Goal #2, "Design excellence in site planning, architecture, and landscape architecture in new development ". The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The project has been conditioned to conform to the Uniform Building Code, and all construction will be inspected by City staff prior to occupancy. The Fire Department staff has also found that the site design will provide adequate emergency access in the case of a need for emergency response to the site. Attachments: 1. PC Resolution No.- 02- - Blue Page 4 Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 7 2. Exhibits- Blue Page 18 A. Vicinity Map B. General Plan Map C. Zoning Map D. Site Plan E. Grading Plan F. Building Elevations G. Floor Plan H. Landscape Plan R:\D P~2001\014}307 mosco lot 34~Staff Report for Continuance 2.doc 3 ATI'ACHMENT NO. 1 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2002- R:'~D P~2001\01-0307 mosco lot 34\Staff Report for Continuance 2.doc 4 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 01- 0307, DEVELOPMENT PLAN CONSTRUCT, ESTABLISH AND OPERATE A 24,170 INDUSTRIAL/WAREHOUSE BUILDING ON 1.50 VACANT ACRES. GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF ZEVO DRIVE, WEST OF DIAZ ROAD KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 909-360-034 WHEREAS, Don Mosco Builders, filed Planning Application No. PA01-0307 Development Plan "Application"), in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code; WHEREAS, the Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application on April 3, May 15 and June 26, 2002, at duly noticed public hearings as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission recommended approval of the Application subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder; WHEREAS, all legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by reference. Section 2. Findinqs. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby makes the following findings as required by Section 176.05.01 OF of the Temecula Municipal Code: 1. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan and with all applicable requirements of state law and other City ordinances. The plan to develop a 24,170 square foot warehouse/industrial building is consistent with the Light Industrial ill) policies and development regulations. The proposed plan incorporates architectural and landscape designs, which will achieve the City's General Plan Community Design Goal #2, "Design excellence in site planning, architecture, and landscape architecture in new development ". 2. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The project has been conditioned to conform to the Uniform Building Code, and all construction will be inspected by City staff prior to occupancy. The Fire Department staff has also found that the site design will provide adequate emergency access in the case of a need for emergency response to the site. Section3. Environmental Compliance. The project will have no significant environmental impacts and has been found to be categorically exempt, Pursuant to Section 15332 class 32 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines. Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby conditionally approves the Application, a request to develop a 24,170 square foot warehouse/industrial building set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference together with any and all necessary conditions that may be deemed necessary. R:~D P~2001~014)307 mosco lot 34~Staff Report for Continuance 2.doc 5 Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 26th day of June, 2002. ATTEST: Dennis Chiniaeff, Chairperson Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certifythat PC Resolution No. 02-__was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 26th day of June, 2002, by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary RAD P~2001\014)307 mosco lot 34\Staff Report for Continuance 2.doc 6 EXHIBIT A CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL R:~D P~2001\01-0307 mosco lot 34\Slaff Report for Continuance 2.doc 7 EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: Project Description: Development Impact Fee Category: Assessor's Parcel No.: Approval Date: Expiration Date: PLANNING DIVISION PA01-0307 Development Plan Planning Application to construct, establish and operate a 24,170 square foot warehouse/ industrial building on 1.50-acres of vacant land. The Development Impact Fee for the project will be Business Park/Industrial 909-360-034 June 26, 2002 June 26, 2004 Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project 1. The applicant shall deliver to the Community Development Department - Planning Division a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty- Four Dollars ($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption required under Public Resources Code Section 21108(b) and California Code of Regulations Section 15075. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant has not delivered to the Community Development Department - Planning Division the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by mason of failure of condition [Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)]. General Requirements 2. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection, the City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, void, annul, seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. 3. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves its right to take any and ail action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. 4. All conditions shall be complied with prior to any occupancy or use allowed by this Development Plan. 5. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this development plan. 6. This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction R:~D PX2001\014}307 mosco lot 34~Shaff Report for Continuance 2.doc 8 10. contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibits D (Site Plan), E (Grading Plan), F (Building Elevation), G (Floor Plan), H (Landscape Plan), and i (Color and Material Board) contained on file with the Community Development Department - Planning Division. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable satisfaction of the Planning Director. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the Planning Director shall have the authority to require the preper17 owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any successors in interest. All mechanical and roof equipment shall be fully screened from public view by being placed below the lowest level of the surrounding parapet wall. A roof top equipment plan, including equipment model numbers and cross-sections shall be submitted for review and apprevai prior to submittal of building plans. The colors and materials for the project shall substantially conform to those noted directly below and with Exhibit "1" (Color and Material Board), contained on file with the Community Development Department - Planning Division. Primary wall exterior: Exterior Accent Building Glazing Vista paint #219(1 ) "Marble" Vista paint #221 (2) "Sablewood" Vista paint #754(3) "Palo Verde" Green Reflective Glass 11. The construction landscape drawings shall indicate coordination and grouping of all utilities, which are to be screened from view per applicable City Codes and guidelines. 12. The construction drawings shall indicate a 15'x 24' decorative concrete paving area directly behind and adjacent to the driveway off Zevo Drive. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits 13. The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be provided by the Community Development Department - Planning Division staff, and return one signed set to the Community Development Department - Planning Division for their files. 14. The applicant shall submit to the Community Development Department - Planning Division for permanent filing two (2) 8" X 10" glossy photographic color prints of the approved Color and Materials Board and of the colored version of approved Exhibit "E", the colored architectural elevations to the Community Development Department - Planning Division for their files. All labels on the Color and Materials Board and Elevations shall be readable on the photographic prints. 15. The applicant shall submit a parking lot lighting plan to the Planning Department, which meets the requirements of the Development Code and the Palomar Lighting Ordinance. The parking lot light standards shall be placed in such a way as to not adversely impact the growth potential of the parking lot trees. 16. A copy of the Grading Plan shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Department. R:'~D PL2001\014)307 mosco lot 34~Staff Report for Continuance 2.doc 9 17. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that Ordinance or by providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit 18. A Consistency Check fee shall be paid per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule. 19. Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Department - Planning Division. These plans shall conform substantially with the approved Exhibit "F", or as amended by these conditions. The location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The cover page shall identify the total square footage of the landscaped area for the site. The plans shall show temporary irrigation and seeding for the Phase lB area. The plans shall be accompanied by the following items: a. Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal). b. One (1) copy of the approved grading plan. c. Water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water Efficient Ordinance). d. Total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with the approved plan). 20. The construction plans shall indicate the application of heavy exposed aggregate concrete with sealer on the back of the front entry panel along the parapet. Prior to Building Occupancy 21. The property owner shall fully install all required landscaping and irrigation, and submit a landscape maintenance bond in a form and amount approved by the Planning Department for a period of one-year from the date of the first occupancy permit. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 22. Unless otherwise noted, all conditions shall be completed by the Developer at no cost to any Government Agency. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the site plan all existing and proposed property lines, easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and revision. General Requirements 23. A Grading Permit for either rough and/or precise grading, including all on-site flat work and improvements, shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained street right-of-way. 24. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way. 25. All improvement plans and grading plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars. Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit 26. A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include all necessary erosion control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and private property. R:~D Px2001\01-0307 mosco lot 34\Staff Report for Continuance 2.doc l0 27. The .Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works. 28. A Soil Report shall be prepared by a registered Soil or Civil Engineer and submitted to the Director of the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and pavement sections. 29. A Geological Report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address special study zones and the geological conditions of the site, and shall provide recommendations to mitigate the impact of ground shaking and liquefaction. 30. The Developer shall have a Drainage Study prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in accordance with City Standards identifying storm water runoff expected from this site and upstream of this site. The study shall identify all existing or proposed public or private drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. The study shall also analyze and identify impacts to downstream properties and provide specific recommendations to protect the properties and mitigate any impacts. The Developer shall provide any upgrading or upsizing of downstream facilities, including acquisition of drainage or access easements necessary to make required improvements. 31. The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or the project is shown to be exempt. 32. As deemed necessary by the Director of the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: a. Planning Department b. Department of Public Works c. Southern California Edison d. Verizon 33. The Developer shall comply with all constraints that may be shown upon an Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject property. 34. Permanent landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department and the Department of Public Works for review and approval. 35. The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or slope easements for off-site work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public Works. Prior to Issuance of a Building Permit 36. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by either cashier's check or money order, prior to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area drainage plan fee. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid. 37. Improvement plans and/or precise grading plans shall conform to applicable City of Temecula Standards subject to approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works. The following design criteria shall be observed: RSD P~2001\014)307 mosco lot 34~Staff Repor~ for Continuance 2,doc 11 a. Flow line grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over A.C. paving. b. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula Standard No. 207A. c. Streetlights shall be installed along the public streets adjoining the site in accordance with City Standard No. 800, 801,802 and 803. d. Concrete sidewalks and ramps shall be constructed along public street frontages in accordance with City of Temecula Standard Nos. 400, 401and 402. e. All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees. f. Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility. g. All concentrated drainage directed towards the public street shall be conveyed through under sidewalk drains. 38. All access rights, easements for sidewalks for public uses shall be submitted and reviewed by the Director of the Department of Public Works and City Attorney and approved by City Council for dedication to the City where sidewalks meander through private property. 39. The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance with the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered Civil Engineer, and the Soil Engineer shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions. 40. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06. 41. The Developer shall record a written offer to participate in, and waive all rights to object to the formation of an Assessment District, a Community Facilities District, or a Bridge and Major Thoroughfare Fee District for the construction of the proposed Western Bypass Corddor in accordance with the General Plan. The form of the offer shall be subject to the approval of the City Engineer and City Attorney. Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy 42. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: a. Rancho California Water District b. Department of Public Works 43. All public improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and City standards to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works. 44. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works. FIRE DEPARTMENT 45. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when the Fire Prevention Bureau reviews building plans. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes that are in force at the time of building plan submittal. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all commercial buildings per CFC Appendix III.A, Table A-III-A-1. The developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 2125 GPM at 46. R:~D P~200l\01-0307 mosco lot 34\StaffReport for Continuance 2.doc 12 20 PSI residual operating pressure, plus an assumed sprinkler demand of 2350 GPM for a total fire flow of 4475 GPM with 4 hour duration. The required fire flow may be adjusted during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire Flow as given above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC 903.2, Appendix Ill-A) 47. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC Appendix Ill-B, Table A-III-B-1. A minimum of 5 hydrants, in a combination of on-site and off- site (6" x 4" x 2-2 1/2" outlets) shall be located on Fire Department access roads and adjacent public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 300 feet apart, at each intersection and shall be located no more than 180 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required. (CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix Ill-B) 48. As required by the California Fire Code, when any portion of the facility is in excess of 150 feet from a water supply on a public street, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the facility, on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided. For this project on site fire hydrants are required. (CFC 903.2) 49. If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection pdor to any building construction. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2) 50. Prior to building construction, all locations where structures ara to be built shall have approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access reads for use until permanent roads are installed. Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface for 80,000 lbs. GVVV. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2) 51. Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved Fire Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or any portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface designed for 80,000 lbs. GVVV with a minimum AC thickness of .25 feet. (CFC sec 902) 52. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13) feet six (6) inches. (CFC 902.2.2.1) 53. The gradient for fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed fifteen {15) percent. (CFC 902.2.2.6 Ord. 99-14) 54. Prior to building construction, dead end roadways and streets in excess of one hundred and fifty (150) feet that have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of accommodating fire apparatus. (CFC 902.2.2.4) 55. Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature block; and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. After the local water company signs the plans, the originals shall be presented to the Fire Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system including fire hydrants shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building materials being placed on an individual lot. (CFC 8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and NFPA 24 1-4.1) 56. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective Markers" shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations. (CFC 901.4.3) R:~D 1'~200 I\01-0307 mosco lot 34\Staff Report for Continuance 2.doc ~3 57. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, approved numbers or addresses shall be provided on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Numbers shall be of a contrasting color to their background. Commercial, multi-family residential and industrial buildings shall have a minimum twelve (12) inches numbers with suite numbers a minimum of six (6) inches in size. All suites shall give a minimum of six (6) inch high letters and/or numbers on both the front and rear doors. Single-family residences and multi-family residential units shall have four (4) inch letters and/or numbers, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 901.4.4) 58. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on square footage and type of construction, occupancy or use, the developer shall install a fire sprinkler system. Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. (CFC Article 10, CBC Chapter 9) 59. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on a requirement for monitoring the sprinkler system, occupancy or use, the developer shall install an fire alarm system monitored by an approved Underwriters Laboratory listed central station. Plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. (CFC Article 10) 60. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a "Knox-Box" shall be provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six (6) feet in height and be located to the right side of the main entrance door. (CFC 902.4) 61. All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry system for emergency access by fire fighting personnel. (CFC 902.4) 62. Prior to final inspection of any building, the applicant shall prepare and submit [o the Fire Department for approval, a site plan designating Fire Lanes with appropriate lane painting and or signs. 63. Prior to the building final, speculative buildings capable of housing high-piled combustible stock, shall be designed with the following fire protection and life safety features: an automatic fire sprinkler system(s) designed for a specific commodity class and storage arrangement, hose stations, alarm systems, smoke vents, draft curtains, Fire Department access doors and Fire department access roads. Buildings housing high-piled combustible stock shall comply with the provisions California Fire Code Article 81 and all applicable National Fire Protection Association standards. (CFC Article 81) 64. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, the developer/applicant shall be responsible for obtaining underground and/or abovegreund tank permits for the storage of combustible liquids, flammable liquids or any other hazardous materials from both the County Health department and Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 7901.3 and 8001.3) Special Conditions 65. Prior to issuance of building permits, plans for structural protection from vegetation fires shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for review and approval. The measures shall include, but are not limited to, enclosing eaves, noncombustible barriers (cement or block walls), and fuel modification zones. (CFC Appendix ii-A) 66. Prior to building permit issuance, a full technical report may be required to be submitted and to the Fire Prevention Bureau. This report shall address, but not be limited to, all fire and life safety measures per 1998 CFC, 1998 CBC, and NFPA - 13, 24, 72 and 231-C. R:~D P,2001\01~)307 mosco lot 34~Staff Report for Continuance 2.doc 14 67. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final a simple plot plan and a simple floor plan, each as an electronic file of the .DWG format must be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau. Alternative file formats may be acceptable, contact fire prevention for approval. 68. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Fire Code permit process and update any changes in the items and quantities approved as part of their Fire Code permit. These changes shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for review and approval per the Fire Code and is subject to inspection. (CFC 105) 69. The applicant shall submit for review and approval by the Riverside County Department of Environmental Health and City Fire Department an update to the Hazardous Material Inventory Statement and Fire Department Technical Report on file at the city; should any quantities used or stored onsite increase or should changes to operation introduce any additional hazardous material not listed in existing reports. (CFC Appendix II-E) COMMUNITY SERVICES 70. The property owner or private maintenance association shall maintain all perimeter landscaping and parkways. 71. The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of construction debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul construction debris. 72. The developer shall provide adequate space for a recycling bin within the trash enclosure area. BUILDING AND SAFETY 73. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 1998 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 1998 National Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy and Disabled Access Regulations and the Temecula Municipal Code. 74. Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plans showing compliance with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All streetlights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way. 75. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted to the Building & Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School Mitigation Fees. 76. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. 77. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review. 78. Disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building is required. The path of travel shall meet the California Disabled Access Regulations in terms of cross slope, travel slope stripping and signage. Provide all details on plans. (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1, 1998) 79. All building and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations. Provide all details on plans. (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1, 1998) 80. Provide disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building. 81. Provide van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entry. R:~D P~2001\01~)307 mosco lot 34\Staff Report for Continuance 2.doc 15 82. Show path of accessibility from parking to furthest point of improvement. 83. Provide house electrical meter provisions for power for the operation of exterior lighting, fire alarm systems. 84. Restroom fixtures, number and type, to be in accordance with the provisions of the 1998 edition of the California Building Code Appendix 29. Obtain the Division of the State Architect recommendation for the accessible restroom dimensions for toddlers from the Building Official, to implement in the building design. 85. Provide an approved automatic fire sprinkler system. 86. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans prior to permit issuance. 87. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic and mechanical plan for plan review. 88. Truss calculations that are stamped by the engineer of record and the truss manufacturer engineer are required for plan review submittal. 89. Provide precise grading plan for plan check submittal to check for handicap accessibility. 90. A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the building construction. 91. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standard and any block walls if not on the approved building plans, will require separate approvals and permits. 92. Show all building setbacks. 93. Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrance to the project that indicates the hours of construction, shown below, as allowed by the City of Temecula Ordinance No. 0-90-04, specifically Section G (1) of Riverside County Ordinance No. 457.73, for any site within one- quarter mile of an occupied residence. Monday-Friday: 6:30 a.m. - 6:30 p.m. Saturday: 7:00 a.m. - 6;30 p.m. No work is permitted on Sundays of holidays. POLICE DEPARTMENT 94. The construction plans shall indicate the application of painted rooftop addressing plotted on a 9-inch grid pattern with 45-inch tall numerals spaced 9-inch apart. The numerals shall be painted with a standard 9-inch paint roller using fluorescent yellow paint applied over a contrasting background. The address shall be oriented to the street and placed as closely as possible to the edge of the building closest to the street. OUTSIDE AGENCIES 95. The applicant shall comply with the attached letter dated July 17, 2001 from the California Historical Resources Information System. 96. The applicant shall comply with the attached letter dated August 8, 2001 from the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District 97. The applicant shall comply with the attached letter dated July 11,2001 from Rancho Water 98. The applicant shall comply with the attached letter dated July 2, 2001 from County of Riverside Department of Environmental Health. By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be subject to Community Development Department approval. Applicant's Signature Name printed Date R:~D P~2001\01-0307 mosco lot 34\Staff Report for Continuance 2.doc 17 ATTACHMENT NO. 2 EXHIBITS R:~D B2001\014)307 mosco lot 34~Staff Report for Continuance 2.dec ~8 CITY OF TEMECULA ect Site CASE NO. - PA01-0307 EXHIBIT - A PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - JUNE 26, 2002 VICINITY MAP R:~D PX2001\01-0307 mosco lot 34~Staff Report for Continuance 2.doc 19 CITY OF TEMECULA EXHIBIT B - GENERAL PLAN MAP DESIGNATION - (LI) LIGHT INDUSTRIAL EXHIBIT C o ZONING DESIGNATION - (LI) LIGHT INDUSTRIAL CASE NO. - PA01-0307 PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - JUNE 26, 2002 R:~D 1~2001\01-0307 mosco lot 34\Staff Report for Continuance 2.doc 20 CITY OF TEMECULA CASE NO. - PA01-0307 EXHIBIT - D PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - JUNE 26, 2002 SITE PLAN R:~D P',2001\01-0307 mosco lot 34\Staff Report for Continuance 2.doc CITY OFTEMECULA CASE NO. - PA01-0307 EXHIBIT - E PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - JUNE 26, 2002 '~C] OA-~Z GRADING PLAN RAD P~2001\01-0307 mosco lot 34\Staff Report for Continuance 2.doc 22 CITY OF TEMECULA NORTH FI FVATION tqE~T Fi F~'ATION ENT'~Y Fi FVATION CASE NO. - PA01-0307 EXHIBIT - F PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - JUNE 26, 2002 BUILDING ELEVATIONS RAD PX2001\01-0307 mosco lot 34~Staff Report for Continuance 2.doc 23 CITY OF TEMECULA [_- I PLA~I, IqEZZAI~INE t__t OASE NO. - PA01-030? EXHIBIT - G FLOOR PLAN PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - JUNE 26, 2002 R:~D P~2001\014)307 mosco lot 34\Staff Report for Continuance 2.doc 24 CITY OF TEMECULA CASE NO. - PA01-0307 EXHIBIT- H LANDSCAPE PLAN PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - JUNE 26, 2002 R:~D PL2001\01-0307 mosco lot 34~Staff Report for Continuance 2.doc 25 ITEM #5 STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION June 26, 2002 RECOMMENDATION: 1. Planning Application No. 02-0284 (Development Plan) Prepared By: Michael McCoy, Project Planner The community Development Department - Planning Division Staff recommends the Planning Commission: ADOPT a Resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2002-__ A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 02- 0284, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR A SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE TO PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 01-0385, WHICH REQUESTS ELIMINATING THE APPROVED TENANT ENTRANCE CANOPIES ALONG THE FRONT ELEVATION OF BUILDING "A" AND SUBSTITUTING THEM FOR LARGE ACCENT TREES LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF WINCHESTER ROAD AT THE TERMINUS OF COLT COURT AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 909-360-025 APPLICATION INFORMATION APPLICANT: PROPOSAL: David Silver, Temecula Partners, LLC A proposal to eliminate the approved metal canopies along the front elevation and replacing them with large accent trees in the same location. LOCATION: North side of Winchester Road at the terminus of Colt Court, west of Diaz Road EXISTING ZONING: SURROUNDING ZONING: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: EXISTING LAND USE: Light Industrial (LI) North: Light Industrial (LI) South: Light Industrial (LI) East: Light Industrial (LI) West: Light Industrial (LI) Business Park (BP) Vacant R:~SUB CONFORMANCEX2002X024)284 Temecula Parmers east parcel canopy removalXSTF REPT g2 WITH APPROVAL TO TREES RECC.doc SURROUNDING LAND USES: North: Vacant South: Industrial/Office East: Industrial/Warehouse West: Vacant PROJECT STATISTICS (DEVELOPMENT PLAN) Lot area (gross): 131,146-sq. ft. (3.01 acres) Building square footage: Building A: 23,712 square feet Building B: 19,400 square feet Building height: 25' Landscaped area: 35,702 square feet (27%) Parking required: 98 vehicle spaces Parking provided: 100 vehicle spaces (and including 6 disabled spaces, 2 class II bicycle racks and 6 motorcycle spaces) Lot coverage: 30% Target Floor Area Ratio: 0.40 BACKGROUND Planning Application 01-0385 was approved at the June 5, 2002 Planning Commission meeting, with decorative metal canopies above each of the five individual tenant suite entrances along the front elevation of Building "A." One week following the public hearing, the project representative contacted staff to request that the canopy structures be removed due to cost considerations. Staff told the applicant that eliminating the canopies without a suitable substitute relief element would result in a recommendation of denial and advised the applicant to consider an alternative relief feature to replace the canopies. The applicant subsequently submitted an application for Substantial Conformance to the previously approved Development Plan application PA01-0385 for Planning Commission review. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/ANALYSIS The applicant is requesting a Substantial Conformance for Planning Application No. 01-0385, to eliminate the approved canopy structures above the tenant suite entrances across the front elevation of Building "A" and install large evergreen accent trees within each of the six landscape planters adjacent to the tenant suite entrances facing Winchester Road. The approved building elevation features eleven separate tenant suites with two suite entrances located at five of the six staggered wall offsets sections across the length of the frontage. A 10-foot deep by 15-foot wide landscape planter is located within each tenant suite offset section below the 5-foot deep by 25-feet wide canopy structure that runs across the top of the two suite entrances supported by thin vinyl encased guy wires. Staff has analyzed this proposal for conformance with the Development Code and the Design Guidelines, and has determined that this request is consistent with both documents. Section 17.08.070B (7.b) General Performance Standards of the Development Code, recommends that new R:~SUB CONFORMANCEX2002\024)284 Temecula Paxmers east parcel canopy removalXSTF REPT ~ WITH APPROVAL TO TREES RECC.doc 2 commemial and industrial buildings use contrasting vertical and horizontal elements to break up the visual mass of the fa<;ade into smaller areas to provide variety and visual interest. Section 17,08o070D (2.b) recommends that industrial buildings avoid blank wall sections along street frontages. The Industrial Design Guidelines encourage building entry accentuation through the use of offsetting and architectural details. While the applicant is citing budget concerns with their request to eliminate the overhead canopies along building frontage, staff is satisfied with their agreement at staff's request to provide larger evergreen accent trees within each of the tenant suite planters. It is the opinion of staff that the taller accent trees will serve to effectively break up the front building elevation and provide proper visual relief and accentuation to the front elevation facing the public street. In essence, a natural relief feature would replace a man-made relief feature and could achieve the objectives and policies of the Architectural Performance Standards and the Design Guidelines. The City landscape consultant recommends either a 36-inch to 48-inch box size evergreen tree, such as a Fern Pine, or a minimum 10-foot high Queen Palm tree within the six tenant entrance planters. The approved conceptual landscape plan shows three 24-inch box size Fern Pine trees against each side of the building to provide additional vertical wall relief. The approved plan also shows a 5-gallon accent Fan Palm tree within each of the tenant suite planters. The City landscape consultant believes that the size of these planters should be quite adequate to accommodate the larger trees in place of the small Fan Palms without creating either unusual maintenance problems · nor potential pavement cracking from root expansion with proper metal root barriers installed. The additional trees can then be added to the construction landscape plans that have not yet been submitted by the applicant. Condition No. 8 would permit either tree to be used if the Planning Commission concurs with staff's recommendation. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION The application is consistent with the previously adopted notice of exemption Section 15332 class 32 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines. CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION Staff has determined that the proposed change is consistent with the City's Design Guidelines and the Development Code Performance Standards since large accent evergreen trees planted between each tenant entrance should effectively provide visual accentuation and vertical relief along the building frontage. Staff recommends approval of the Development Plan Substantial Conformance application as proposed. FINDINGS - Development Plan (Section 17.05.010F) 1, The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the city. The proposal a Substantial Conformance for a Development Plan, is consistent with the Community Design Element of the General Plan, Development Code Performance Standards, and the Industrial Design Guidelines. The element requires that large wall surfaces be divided with offsets to create distinctive shadow lines. The General Performance Standards of the Development Code, recommend that new commercial and industrial buildings use contrasting vertical and horizontal elements to break up the visual mass of the facade into smaller areas to provide vadety and visual interest. R:~SUB CONFORMANCES2002\02-0284 Temecula Partners cast parcel canopy removahSTF REPT #2 W1TH APPROVAL TO TREES RECC.dcc 3 2. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The overall development is consistent with the Development Code Performance Standards and City Wide Design Guidelines, which were adopted to protect the general welfare of the public. Substituting the canopies with the taller accent trees should maintain the visual relief and entrance accentuation of the building's frontage facing the public right-of-way and thus protect the general welfare and surrounding properties. Attachments: PC Resolution No. - 02- - Blue Page 5 Exhibit A - Revised Conditions of Approval for Planning Application 01-0385 - Blue Page 8 Exhibits - Blue Page 20 B. C. D. E. F. G. Vicinity Map General Plan Map Zoning Map Approved Site Plan reduction Approved Elevation Plan reduction Revised Elevation Plan reduction Approved Conceptual Landscape Plan reduction R:XSUB CONFORMANCEX2002\02-0284 Tcmecula Paxmers east parcel canopy removalXSTF REPT g2 WITH APPROVAL TO TREES RECC.doc ATTACHMENT NO. 1 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2002- R:~SUB CONFORMANCES2002\024)284 Temecula Parmers east parcel canopy removal~STF REPT #2 W1TH APPROVAL TO TREES RECC.doc 5 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 02- 0284, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR A SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE TO PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 01-0385, WHICH REQUESTS REPLACING THE APPROVED TENANT ENTRANCE CANOPIES ALONG THE FRONT ELEVATION OF BUILDING "A", WITH TALL EVERGREEN ACCENT TREES LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF WINCHESTER ROAD AT THE TERMINUS OF COLT COURT AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 909-360-025 WHEREAS, Temecula Partners, LLC, filed Planning Application No. 02-0284 (Development Plan Application), in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code; WHEREAS, the Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application on June 26, 2002, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission recommended approval of the Application subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder; WHEREAS, all legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF TI-IE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. by reference. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated Section 2. Findinqs. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby makes the following findings as required by Section 17.05.010F of the Temecula Municipal Code: 1. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the city. The proposal a Substantial Conformance for a Development Plan, is consistent with the Community Design Element of the General Plan, Development Code Performance Standards, and the Industrial Design Guidelines. The element requires that large wall surfaces be divided with offsets to create distinctive shadow lines. The General Performance Standards of the Development Code, recommend that new commercial and industrial buildings use contrasting vertical and horizontal elements to break up the visual mass of the facade into smaller areas to provide variety and visual interest. R:XSUB CONFORMANCEk2002\02-0284 Temecula Partners east parcel canopy removal~STF REPT g2 grlTH APPROVAL TO TREES RECC.doc 6 2. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The overall development is consistent with the Development Code Performance Standards and City Wide Design Guidelines, which were adopted to protect the general welfare of the public. Substituting the canopies with the taller accent trees should maintain the visual relief and entrance accentuation of the building's frontage facing the public right-of-way and thus protect the general welfare and surrounding properties. Section 3. Environmental Compliance. The application is consistent with the previously adopted notice of exemption Section 15332 class 32 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines. Section 4. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 26th day of June 2002. ATTEST: Dennis Chiniaeff, Chairperson Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that PC Resolution No. 02-__was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 26th day of June, 2002, by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary R:~SUB CONFORMANCES2002\02-0284 Temecula Pa~ners east parcel canopy removal~STF REPT 6'2 Wl'rH APPROVAL TO TREES RECC.doc 7 EXHIBIT A REVISED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR PA01-0385 R:~SUB CO N FOR M ANCE~2002\02-0284 Temecula Partners east parcel canopy removalXSTF REPT #2 WITH APPROVAL TO TREES RECC.doc 8 EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA REVISED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: PA01-0385 Development Plan Project Description: Planning Application to construct, establish and operate a 19,400 sq. ft. and a 23,700 sq. ft. warehouse/industrial speculative building on 3.25 acres of vacant land on the north side of Winchester Road at the Colt Court terminus, west of Diaz Road. DIF Category: Business Park/Industrial Assessor's Parcel Nos.: 909-360-025 and 042 Approval Date: Expiration Date: April 24, 2002 April 24, 2004 PLANNING DIVISION Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project The applicant shall deliver to the Community Development Department - Planning Division a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty- Four Dollars ($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption required under Public Resources Code Section 21108(b) and California Code of Regulations Section 15075. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant has not delivered to the Community Development Department - Planning Division the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition [Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)]. General Requirements The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection, the City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, void, annul, seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, conceming the Planning Application. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves its right to take any and all action the City deems to R:~SUB CONFORMANCE~2002\02q)284 Temecula Partners east parcel canopy removalXSTF REPT #2 WITH APPROVAL TO TREES RECC.doc 9 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. All conditions shall be complied with prior to any occupancy or use allowed by this Development Plan. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this development plan. This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibits "D" (Site Plan), "E" (Building Elevation), "F" (Floor Plan), "G" (Revised Conceptual Landscape Plan), "H" (Grading Plan) and 'T' (Color and Material Board) contained on file with the Community Development Department - Planning Division. The Conceptual Landscape Plan shall be revised and a three (3) new exhibits submitted to the Planning Department to include the addition of six (6) large evergreen accent trees, either 36-inch to 48-inch box Fern Pines or 10-foot minimum height Queen Palms, across the frontage of Building "A" within each of the 6 landscape planters at the tenant suite entrances. The final tree size and species shall be reviewed and approved by staff and included on the construction landscape plans. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable satisfaction of the Planning Director. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the Planning Director shall have the authority to require the property owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any successors in interest. All mechanical and roof equipment shall be fully screened from public view by being placed below the lowest level of the surrounding parapet wall. All Downspouts on the front of the building shall be internalized. The colors and materials for the project shall substantially conform to those noted directly below and with Exhibit "1" (Color and Material Board), or as superceded by these conditions, contained on file with the Community Development Department - Planning Division. Primary concrete exterior wall color: Secondary concrete exterior wall color: Metal canopy color: Ceramic tile wall accent: Window and door glazing: Window and door framing system: Metal loading doors: Vista #80 "Oat Cake" Vista #82 "River Rock" Vista #168 "Cocoa Bean" Vista #168 "Cocoa Bean" Viracon Solarscreen #VS 5-14 blue glass Mill Finish Anodized Aluminum Vista #82 "River Rock" The construction landscape drawings shall indicate coordination and grouping of all utilities, which are to be screened from view per applicable City Codes and guidelines. The internal driveway between the two buildings' loading zones shall be clearly indicated as a one-way direction with arrows painted on the asphalt ddveway and visible signage. RASUB CONFORMANCES2002\024)284 Temecula Parmers east parcel canopy removaBSTF REPT 82 WITH APPROVAL TO TREES RECC.doc 10 15. The ten-foot wide striped loading zones along the roar of each building shall have clearly marked signage near each tenant loading door indicating temporary parking only for loading and unloading purposes. 16. No outdoor storage of any materials shall be permitted within the one-way internal driveway, the outer circulation driveway around the outside of the two buildings, or along any fencing or refuse dumpsters. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits 17. The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be provided by the Community Development Department - Planning Division staff, and retum one signed set to the Community Development Department - Planning Division for their files. 18. The applicant shall submit to the Community Development Department - Planning Division for permanent filing two (2) 8" X 10" glossy photographic color prints of the approved Color and Materials Board of approved Exhibit 'T', to the Community Development Department - Planning Division for their files. All labels on the Color and Materials Board and Elevations shall be readable on the photographic prints. 19. The applicant shall submit a parking lot lighting plan to the Planning Department, which meets the requirements of the Development Code and the Palomar Lighting Ordinance. The parking lot light standards shall be placed in such a way as to not adversely impact the growth potential of the parking lot trees. 20. A copy of the Grading Plan shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Department. 21. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that Ordinance or by providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid. 22. If cultural resources are found on the project site, all grading activity shall cease and the site shall be reviewed by an archeologist for cultural resource and archeological impacts. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit 23. 24. A Consistency Check fee shall be paid per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule. Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Department - Planning Division. These plans shall conform substantially with the approved Exhibit "G" (Revised Conceptual Landscape Plan) or as amended by these conditions. The plans shall include the addition of six (6) large evergreen accent trees, either 36-inch to 48-inch box Fern Pines or 10-foot minimum height Queen Palms, across the frontage of Building "A" within each of the 6 landscape planters at the tenant suite entrances. Each new tree shall provide proper metal root barriers to protect paved areas. The location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The cover page shall identify the total square footage of the landscaped area for the site.. The plans shall be accompanied by the following items: a. Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal). b. One (1) copy of the approved grading plan. c. Water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water Efficient Ordinance). R:~SUB CONFORMANCES2002\024)284 Tcmecula Partners east parcel canopy removahSTF REPT g2 WITH APPROVAL TO TREES RECC.doc 11 25. 26. 27. 28. d. Total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with the approved plan). A reciprocal access agreement shall be established in the property title to provide for common access between this properbj and the adjacent pamel to the west. The access agreement shall provide for emergency access and limited public access. The applicant shall submit to the Planning Department, details of the employee patio area, to include type of furniture and amenities to be installed. The design of all decorative concrete paving, including color and finish, shall be shown on the construction plans and approved by the Planning Department. A multi-tenant sign program shall be submitted with the appropriate fee, in conformance with City Ordinances, Design Guidelines, and Development Code for review and approval by the Planning Department. Prior to Building Occupancy 29. 30. 31. The property owner shall fully install all required landscaping and irrigation, and submit a landscape maintenance bond in a form and amount approved by the Planning Department for a period of one-year from the date of the first occupancy permit. The construction plans shall indicate the application of painted rooftop addressing plotted on a 9-inch grid pattern with 45-inch tall numerals spaced 9-inch apart. The numerals shall be painted with a standard 9-inch paint roller using fluorescent yellow paint applied over a contrasting background. The address shall be oriented to the street and placed as closely as possible to the edge of the building closest to the street. If the project is built in phases, the applicant shall hydroseed the undeveloped building pad until construction of that building occurs. BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT 32. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 1998 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 1998 National Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy and Disabled Access Regulations and the Temecula Municipal Code. 33. Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plans showing compliance with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All streetlights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way. 34. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted to the Building & Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School Mitigation Fees. 35. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. 36. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review. 37. Disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building is required. The path of travel shall meet the California Disabled Access Regulations in terms of cress slope, R:~SUB CONFORMANCEs2002\02-0284 Temecula Palmers east parcel canopy removal~STF REPT #2 WITH APPROVAL TO TREES RECC.doc 38. 39. 40. 41, 42. 43. 44. 45. 46. 47. 48. 49. 50. 51. travel slope stripping and signage. Provide all details on plans. (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1, 1998) All building and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations. Provide all details on plans. (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1, 1998) Provide van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entry. Show path of accessibility from parking to furthest point of improvement. Provide house electrical meter provisions for ~ower for the operation of exterior lighting, fire alarm systems. Restroom fixtures, number and type, to be ~n accordance with the provisions of the 1998 edition of the California Building Code Appendix 29. Obtain the Division of the State Architect recommendation for the accessible restroom dimensions for toddlers from the Building Official, to implement in the building design. Provide an approved automatic fire sprinkler system. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans prior to permit issuance. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic and mechanical plan for plan review. Truss calculations that are stamped by the engineer of record and the truss manufacturer engineer are required for plan review submittal. Provide precise grading plan for plan check submittal to check for handicap accessibility. A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the building construction. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standard and any block walls if not on the approved building plans, will require separate approvals and permits. Show all building setbacks. Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrance to the project that indicates the hours of construction, shown below, as allowed by the City of Temecula Ordinance No. 0-90-04, specifically Section G (1) of Riverside County Ordinance No. 457.73, for any site within one- quarter mile of an occupied residence. Monday-Friday: 6:30 a.m. - 6:30 p.m. Saturday: 7:00 a.m. - 6:30 p.m. No work is permitted on Sunday or Government Holidays PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 52. Unless otherwise noted, all conditions shall be completed by the Developer at no cost to any Government Agency. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the site plan all existing and proposed property lines, easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and revision. R:~SUB CONFORMANCEX2002\024~284 Tcmecula Parmers cast parcel canopy removalXSTF REPT #2 WITH APPROVAL TO TREES RECC.doc 13 General Requirements 53. 54. 55. A Grading Permit for either rough and/or precise grading, including all on-site fiat work and improvements, shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained street right-of-way. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way. All improvement plans and grading plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars. Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit 56. A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include all necessary erosion control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and private property. 57. The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works. 58. A Soil Report shall be prepared by a registered Soil or Civil Engineer and submitted to the Director of the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and pavement sections. 59. A Geological Report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address special study zones and the geological conditions of the site, and shall provide recommendations to mitigate the impact of ground shaking and liquefaction. 60. The Developer shall have a Drainage Study prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in accordance with City Standards identifying storm water runoff expected from this site and upstream of this site. The study shall identify all existing or proposed public or private drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. The study shall also analyze and identity impacts to downstream properties and provide specific recommendations to protect the properties and mitigate any impacts. Any upgrading or upsizing of downstream facilities, including acquisition of drainage or access easements necessary to make required improvements, shall be provided by the Developer. 61. The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or the project is shown to be exempt. 62. As deemed necessary by the Director of the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Planning Department Department of Public Works Southern California Edison Verizon RASUB CO NFO RMANCEx2002\024Y284 Temecula Partners east parcel canopy remova~STF REPT g2 WITH APPROVAL TO TREES RECC.doc 14 63. 64, 65. 66. The Developer shall comply with all constraints, which may be shown upon an Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject property. Permanent landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department and the Department of Public Works for review and approval. The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or slope easements for off-site work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public Works. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by either cashier's check or money order, prior to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area drainage plan fee. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid. Prior to Issuance of a Building Permit 67. A Parcel Merger to combine Parcel 25 and Parcel A of amended LLA#98-0119 shall be processed. 58. Improvement plans and/or precise grading plans shall conform to applicable City of Temecula Standards subject to approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works. The following design criteria shall be observed: a. Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over A.C. paving. b. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula Standard No. 207A. c. All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees. d. Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility. e. All concentrated drainage directed towards the public street shall be conveyed through undersidewalk drains. 69. The Developer shall construct the following public improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works. a. Street improvements, which may include, but not limited to: drive approaches 70. The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance with the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered Civil Engineer, and the Soil Engineer shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions. 71. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06. 72. The Developer shall record a written offer to participate in, and waive all rights to object to the formation of an Assessment District, a Community Facilities District, or a Bridge and Major Thoroughfare Fee District for the construction of the proposed Western Bypass Corridor in accordance with the General Plan. The form of the offer shall be subject to the approval of the City Engineer and City Attorney. R:~SUB CON FORMANCI~2002\02-0284 Tcmecula Partners cast parcel canopy removal~STF REPT #2 WITH APPROVAL TO TREES RECC.doc 15 Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy 73. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: a. Rancho California Water District b. Eastern Municipal Water District c. Department of Public Works 74. All public improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and City standards to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works. 75. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works. FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU 76. 77. 78. 79. 80. 81, 82, Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in fome at the time of building plan submittal. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all commemial buildings per CFC Appendix III.A, Table A-III-A-1. The developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 2125 GPM at 20 PSI residual operating pressure, plus an assumed sprinkler demand of 1850 GPM for a total fire flow of 3975 GPM with a 4 hour duration. The required fire flow may be adjusted during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire Flow as given above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC 903.2, Appendix Ill-A) The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC Appendix Ill-B, Table A-III-B-1. A minimum of 5 hydrants, in a combination of on-site and off- site (6" x 4" x 2-2 1/2" outlets) shall be located on Fire Department access roads and adjacent public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 300 feet apart, at each intersection and shall be located no more than 180 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required. (CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix Ill-B) As required by the California Fire Code, when any portion of the facility is in excess of 150 feet from a water supply on a public street, as measured by an approved mute around the exterior of the facility, on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided. For this project on site fire hydrants are required. (CFC 903.2) Maximum cul-de-sac length shall not exceed 1320 feet. Minimum turning radius on any cul- de-sac shall be forty-five (45) feet. (CFC 902.2.2.2.3 and Subdivision Ord 16.03.020) If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection prior to any building construction. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2) Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent roads are installed. Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface for 80,000 lbs. GVW. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2) R:~SUB CON FORM ANC Ek2002\024Y284 Temecula Partners eost parcel canopy removal~STF REFt g'2 WITH APPROVAL TO TREES RECC.doc 16 83. Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved Fire Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or any portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface designed for 80,000 lbs. GVVV with a minimum AC thickness of .25 feet. (CFC sec 902) 84. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13) feet six (6) inches. (CFC 902.2.2.1) 85. The gradient for fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed fifteen (15) percent. (CFC 902.2.2.6 Ord. 99-14) 86. Prior to building construction, dead end roadways and streets in excess of one hundred and fifty (150) feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of accommodating fire apparatus. (CFC 902.2.2.4) 87. Prior to building construction, this development shall have two (2) points of access, via all- weather sudace roads, as approved bythe Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 902.2.1) 88. Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature block; and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. After the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be presented to the Fire Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system including fire hydrants shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building materials being placed on an individual lot. (CFC 8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and National Fire Protection Association 24 1-4.1) 89. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective Markers" shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations. (CFC 901.4.3) 90. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, approved numbers or addresses shall be provided on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Numbers shall be of a contrasting color to their background. Commercial, multi-family residential and industrial buildings shall have a minimum twelve (12) inches numbers with suite numbers a minimum of six (6) inches in size. All suites shall give a minimum of six (6) inch high letters and/or numbers on both the front and rear doors. Single-family residences and multi-family residential units shall have four (4) inch letters and/or numbers, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 901.4.4) 91. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on square footage and type of construction, occupancy or use, the developer shall install a fire sprinkler system. Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. (CFC Article 10, CBC Chapter 9) 92. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on a requirement for monitoring the sprinkler system, occupancy or use, the developer shall install an fire alarm system monitored byan approved Underwriters Laboratory listed central station. Plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. (CFC Article 10) 93. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a "Knox-Box" shall be provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six (6) feet in height and be located to the right side of the main entrance door. (CFC 902.4) R:\SUB CONFORMANCEX2002\02-0284 Temecula partners east parcel canopy removal\STF REPT #2 WITH APPROVAL TO TREES RECC.doc 17 94. All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry system for emergency access by fire fighting personnel. (CFC 902.4) 95. Prior to final inspection of any building, the applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire Department for approval, a site plan designating Fire Lanes with appropriate lane painting and or signs. 96. Prior to the building final, speculative buildings capable of housing high-piled combustible stock, shall be designed with the following fire protection and life safety features: an automatic fire sprinkler system(s) designed for a specific commodity class and storage arrangement, hose stations, alarm systems, smoke vents, draft curtains, Fire Department access doors and Fire department access roads. Buildings housing high-piled combustible stock shall comply with the provisions California Fire Code Article 81 and all applicable National Fire Protection Association standards. (CFC Article 81 ) 97. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, the developer/applicant shall be responsible for obtaining underground and/or aboveground tank permits for the storage of combustible liquids, flammable liquids or any other hazardous materials from both the County Health department and Fire Prevention Bureau.(CFC 7901.3 and 8001.3) Special Conditions 98. Prior to building permit issuance, a full technical report may be required to be submitted and to the Fire Prevention Bureau. This report shall address, but not be limited to, all fire and life safety measures per 1998 CFC, 1998 CBC, NFPA - 13, 24, 72 and 231-C. 99. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final a simple plot plan and a simple floor plan, each as an electronic file of the .DWG format must be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau. Alternative file formats may be acceptable, contact fire prevention for approval. 100. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Fire Code permit process and update any changes in the items and quantities approved as part of their Fire Code permit. These changes shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for review and approval per the Fire Code and is subject to inspection. (CFC 105) 101. The applicant shall submit for review and approval by the Riverside County Department of Environmental Health and City Fire Department an update to the Hazardous Material Inventory Statement and Fire Department Technical Report on file at the city; should any quantities used or stored onsite increase or should changes to operation introduce any additional hazardous material not listed in existing reports. (CFC Appendix II-E) COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTEMENT 102. All perimeter landscaping and parkways shall be maintained by the property owner or private maintenance association. 103. The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of construction debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul construction debris. 104. If additional street lights are to be installed, the developer shall file an application with the Community Services District (CSD) and pay the appropriate energy fees related to the transfer of said streetlights into the CSD maintenance program, prior to the issuance of building permits or installation of streetlights, whichever comes first. R:~SUB CONFORMANCEX2002X024)284 Tcmecula Parmers east parcel canopy removalXSTF REPT #2 WITH APPROVAL TO TREES RECC.doc 18 By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be subject to Community Development Department approval. Applicant Signature Date Applicant Printed Name R:~SUB CONFORMANCEX2002\024)284 Temecula pa.emers east parcel canopy removal~STF REPT #2 WITH APPROVAL TO TREES RECC.doc 19 ATrACHMENT NO. 2 EXHIBITS R:\SUB CONFORMANCES2002\02-0284 Temecula partners east parcel canopy removal~STF REPT ~r2 WITH APPROVAL TO TREES RECC,doc 2O CITY OF TEMECULA CASE NO. - PA02-0284 EXHIBIT - A PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - June 26, 2002 VICINITY MAP R:~SUB CONFORMANCES.002\02-0284 Temecula Partners east parcel canopy removal\STF REPT #2 WITH APPROVAL TO TREES RECC.doc CITY OF TEMECULA EXHIBIT B - GENERAL PLAN MAP DESIGNATION -(BP) BUSINESS PARK EXHIBIT C - ZONING DESIGNATION - (LI) LIGHT INDUSTRIAL CASE NO. - PA02-0284 PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - June 26, 2002 R:~SUB CON FORMANCE~2002~02-0284 Temecula Partners east pamel canopy removal~STF REPT #2 WITH APPROVAL TO TREES RECC.doc CITY OF TEMECULA Conceptual Site Plan- Temecula Partners LLC-East Temecula, California A1 CASE NO. - PA02-0284 EXHIBIT- D PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - June 26, 2002 APPROVED SITE PLAN R:\SUB C ON FO R M AN C E~?.002~02-0284 Temecula Partners east parcel canopy removal\STF REPT #2 WITH APPROVAL TO TREES RECC.doc CITY OF TEMECULA llii ! ®®®,30 [ cAsE NO. - PA02-0284 EXHIBIT - E PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - June 26, 2002 APPROVED ELEVATION PLAN R:~SUB CONFOR MANCE~002~02-0284 Temecula Partners east parcel canopy removal',STF REPT #2 WITH APPROVAL TO TREES RECC.doc CITY OF TEMECULA CASE NO. - PA02-0284 EXHIBIT- F PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - June 26, 2002 REVISED ELEVATION PLAN R:~SUB CONFORMANCE'~.002~02-0284 Temecula Partners east parcel canopy removal~TF REPT #2 WITH APPROVAL TO TREES RECC.doc CITY OF TEMECULA iiiii i i iiltil i CASE NO.- PA02-0284 EXHIBIT - G PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - June 26, 2002 APPROVED CONCEPTUALLANDSCAPEPLAN R:~SUB CONFORMANCE~?.002~02-0284 Temecula Partners east parcel canopy removaRSTF REPT #2 WITH APPROVAL TO TREES RECC.doc ITEM #6 STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION June 26,2002 Planning Application No, 02-0036 (Development Plan) Prepared By: Rick Rush, Project Planner II ADOPT a Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. 02-0036 pursuant to Section 15332 of the California Environmental Quality Act; 2, ADOPT a Resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2002-~ A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 02- 0036, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT, ESTABLISH AND OPERATE A 36,000 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE BUILDING ON 3.01 VACANT ACRES, GENERALLY LOCATED ON RIDGEGATE DRIVE AND WEST OF RIDGE PARK DRIVE KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 940-310-040 APPLICATION INFORMATION APPLICANT: Lucas Development Company PROPOSAL: Planning Application to design, construct, and operate a 36,000 square foot two-story office building LOCATION: Located on Ridgegate Drive and west of Ridge Park Drive EXISTING ZONING: Business Park (BP) SURROUNDING ZONING: North: Professional Office (PO) South: Business Park (BP) East: Business Park (BP) West: Conservation (OS-C) GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Business Park (BP) EXISTING LAND USE: Vacant SURROUNDING LAND USES: North: Vacant South: Office Buildings East: Office Buildings West: Vacant R:\D P~2002\02-0036 The Summit ~ Crystal Ridge~Staff Rcpon.doc 1 PROJECT STATISTICS (DEVELOPMENT PLAN) Lot area (gross): 131,093 (3.01 acres) Lot area (net) 131,093 (3.01 acres) Building square footage: 36,000 square feet Building height: 38'-0" Landscaped area: 64,936 square feet (49.5%) Parking required: 120 vehicular, 5 handicapped, 6 bicycle, and 5 motorcycle Parking provided: 127 vehicular, 5 handicapped, 6 bicycle, and 5 motorcycle Lot coverage: 13.7% Floor area ratio: .28 BACKGROUND The applicant submitted the application for review on January 22, 2002. A Development Review Meeting was held on Mamh 14, 2002 as a result of this meeting the applicant was furnished a detailed list of revisions required for the project. The applicant addressed all of the revisions and resubmitted on April 24, 2002 and the project was scheduled for public hearing. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Planning Application No. 02-0036 (Development Plan) is a request for the construction of a 36,000 square foot two-story speculative office building located on 3.01 -acre site. The project is located on Ridgegate Drive and west of Ridge Park Drive and is located within the Business Park zoning district. Access to the site is taken from Ridge Park Drive via a forty-foot wide ingress & egress easement known as Ridgegate Drive. Parking for the site is located along the north, south, and east elevations of the building. The building will be constructed utilizing concrete tilt-up panels. The applicant is proposing to use three varying shades of brown while utilizing the darkest shade as an accent color. The applicant is proposing two different window treatments; A bronze tinted glass will be provided along the store front portion of the building entrance and a bronze glazed treatment will be provided on the widows along the first and second floor. The front entry has been located at the center of the front elevation and directly in front of the sites access point. The applicant is providing 64,969 square feet of landscaping, which is forty nine percent of the entire site. The applicant has provided an employee lunch area along the rear elevation of the building. The landscape plan calls for two 15 gal crape myrtle plants to be planted in this area to provide adequate shade for employees. At staff's request the applicant has provided a decorative entry statement along the main entrance to the building. Included in this area is heavy sandblast finished concrete paving, which utilizes saw cut score lines. The area will be planted with four date palm trees and an eighteen-inch high seat wall has been provided. R:kD PX2002\02~036 The Summit @ Crystal Ridge~Staff Report.doc 2 ANALYSIS Staff has made the required findings necessary to approve a two-story office building located in the Business Park zoning district, The proposed site planning and circulation is consistent with the industrial development performance standards in the Development Code. The proposed site plan has eliminated any conflicts between pedestrian and vehicular traffic by located the pedestrian access parallel with the vehicular access and has provided sidewalks along the building elevations that lead to all of the building entrances. The loading and unloading areas have been located to along the north elevation of the building and will not be visible from the public right of way. The drive aisles provided are a minimum twenty-four feet wide, and the applicant has provided area on site to allow fire trucks to circulate on site. The proposed building design is consistent with the architectural design of the Development Code and the architectural elements in the City-Wide Design Guidelines. Providing an entry area that extends approximately eleven feet from the front elevation has broken up the mass and bulk of the proposed two hundred foot long building. The additional height created by this element further serves to break up the front elevation. The proposed amhitecture is broken into three traditional parts as defined in the Design Guidelines. The building base is distinct from the middle section of the building by utilizing contrasting colors. In addition to contrasting colors an approximate one and a half foot wide "belly band" has been provided that creates a break between the first and second floor of the proposed building. A decorative cornice has been provided along the parapet, which further serves to break up the building. An EIFS molding has been added around the windows, which creates the illusion of recessed windows. The bronze-tinted windows proposed are varying in size and shape, which creates visual interest. The proposed building colors and materials are earth tone colors that will blend in with the hillside to the west. The proposed landscaping exceeds the minimum requirements of the Development Code and complements the architectural design theme. The landscaping and decorative paving located at the building's main entrance is a quality design, which serves as a prominent entry statement as well as an area for visitors to congregate. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION The project is exempt from environmental review based on Section 15332 (In-Fill Development Projects) of the California Environmental Quality Act and there are no potentially significant environmental constraints on the site. The project qualifies for a Class 32 infill development exemption because the project is consistent with the General Plan designation and zoning regulations; is located on a site within the city limits, which is served by all utilities; and is less than 5 acres in area. CONCLUSlON/RECOMMEN DATION Staff has determined that the proposed project is consistent with the City's Design Guidelines and conforms to all of the applicable development regulations. Staff recommends approval of the Development Plan with the attached conditions of approval. R:~D PX2002\0243036 The Summit @ C~stal Ridge~Staff Report.doc 3 FINDINGS Development Plan (Section 17.05.010F) 1. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the city. The proposal is consistent with the land use designation and policies reflected for Business Park (BP) development in the City of Temecula General Plan, as well as the development standards for Business Park (BP) zoning district in the City of Temecula Development Code. The site is therefore properly planned and zoned and found to be physically suitable for the type and density of business park development proposed. 2. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The architecture proposed for the office building is consistent with the Architectural requirements as stated in the Design Guidelines and the Industrial Performance Standards of the Development Code. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with, all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety and welfare. Attachments: 1. PC Resolution No. - 02- - Blue Page 5 Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 8 2. Exhibits - Blue Page 20 A. Vicinity Map B. General Plan Map C. Zoning Map D. Site Plan E. Grading Plan F. Building Elevations G. Floor Plan H. Landscape Plan R:~D P~2002\02~036 The Summit @ C~stat Ridge~S~ff Report.doc 4 A'I'I'ACHMENT NO. 1 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2002- R:~D PX2002\02-0036 The Summit @ C~stal Ridge\Staff ReporLdoc PC RESOLUTION NO. 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 02- 0036, DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT, ESTABLISH AND OPERATE A 36,000 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE BUILDING ON 3.01 VACANT ACRES, GENERALLY LOCATED ON RIDGEGATE DRIVE AND WEST OF RIDGE PARK DRIVE KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 940-310-040 WHEREAS, Lucas Development Company, filed Planning Application No. 02-0036 (Development Plan Application), in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code; WHEREAS, the Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application on June 26, 2002, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission recommended approval of the Application subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder; WHEREAS, all legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by reference. Section 2. Findinqs. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby makes the following findings as required by Section 176.05.01 OF of the Temecula Municipal Code: 1. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the city. The proposal is consistent with the land use designation and policies reflected for Business Park (BP) development in the City of Temecula General Plan, as well as the development standards for Business Park (BP) zoning district in the City of Temecula Development Code. The site is therefore properly planned and zoned and found to be physically suitable for the type and density of business park development proposed. 2. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The architecture proposed for the office building is consistent with the Architectural requirements as stated in the Design Guidelines and the Industrial Performance Standards R:',D PX2002\02-0036 The Summit @ Crystal Ridge,Staff Report.doc 6 of the Development Code. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with, all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development wi//be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety and welfare. Section3. Environmental Compliance. The project will have no significant environmental impacts and has been found to be categorically exempt, Pursuant to Section 15332 class 32 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines. Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby conditionally approves the Application, a request to develop a 36,000 square foot two-story office building set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference together with any and all necessary conditions that may be deemed necessary. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 26th day of June 2002. ATTEST: Dennis Chiniaeff, Chairperson Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss CITY OF TEMECULA) I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that PC Resolution No. 02- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular"~'eeting thereof held on the 26th day of June, 2002, by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary R:'~D P~2002\024)036 The Summit @ Crystal Ridge~Staff Report.doc 7 EXHIBIT A CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL R:\D Px2002\02-0036 The Summit @ Crystal Ridge\Staff Report.doc 8 EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: 02-0036 (Development Plan) Project Description: A Development Plan to construct and operate a 36,000 square foot office building located on 3.01 vacant acres DIF Category: Business Park/Industrial Assessor's Parcel No.: 940-310-040 Approval Date: June 26, 2002 Expiration Date: June 26, 2004 PLANNING DIVISlON Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project The applicant shall deliver to the Community Development Department- Planning Division a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty- Four Dollars ($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption required under Public Resoumes Code Section 21108(b) and California Code of Regulations Section 15075. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant has not delivered to the Community Development Department - Planning Division the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition [Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)]. General Requirements The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection, the City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, void, annul, seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves its right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. R:~D P~2002~02-0036 The Summit @ Crystal Ridg¢~ff Relx)rCdoc 9 4. All conditions shall be complied with prior to any occupancy or use allowed by this Development Plan. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this development plan. This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibits D (Site Plan), E (Grading Plan), F (Building Elevation), G (Floor Plan), H (Landscape Plan), and I (Color and Material Board) contained on file with the Community Development Department - Planning Division. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable satisfaction of the Planning Director. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the Planning Director shall have the authority to require the property owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any successors in interest. All mechanical and roof equipment shall be fully screened from public view by being placed below the lowest level of the surrounding parapet wall. 10. All Downspouts shall be internalized. 11. The colors and materials for the project shall substantially conform to those noted directly below and with Exhibit 'I" (Color and Material Board), contained on file with the Community Development Department - Planning Division. Field Paint Color Accent Paint (1) Accent Paint (2) Window Glass Store Front Store Front Windows Frazee #8731W Staghorn Frazee #8733M Walnut Wash Frazee #8735D Wild Country Bronze Reflective Glazing by FordNisteon Bronze Anodized Aluminum Bronze Tinted Glazing by FordNisteon 12. The construction landscape drawings shall indicate coordination and grouping of all utilities, which are to be screened from view per applicable City Codes and guidelines. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits 13. The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be provided by the Community Development Department - Planning Division staff, and return one signed set to the Community Development Department - Planning Division for their files. 14. The applicant shall submit to the Community Development Department - Planning Division for permanent filing two (2) 8" X 10" glossy photographic color prints of the approved Color and Materials Board and of the colored version of approved Exhibit "E", the colored R:~D P~2002\02-0036 The Summit @ Crystal Ridge\StaffReport.doc 10 architectural elevations to the Community Development Department - Planning Division for their files. All labels on the Color and Materials Board and Elevations shall be readable on the photographic prints. 15. The applicant shall submit a parking lot lighting plan to the Planning Department, which meets the requirements of the Development Code and the Palomar Lighting Ordinance. The parking lot light standards shall be placed in such a way as to not adversely impact the growth potential of the parking lot trees. 16. A copy of the Grading Plan shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Department. 17. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that Ordinance or by providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit 18. A Consistency Check fee shall be paid per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule. 19. Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be submitted to the Community Development Department - Planning Division for approval. These plans shall conform substantially with the approved Exhibit 'T', or as amended by these conditions. The location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The cover page shall identify the total square footage of the landscaped area for the site. The plans shall be accompanied by the following items: a. Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal). b. One (1) copy of the approved grading plan. c. Water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water Efficient Ordinance). d. Total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with the approved plan). 20. The Planning Director shall approve the Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans. Prior to Building Occupancy 21. The property owner shall fully install all required landscaping and irrigation, and submit a landscape maintenance bond in a form and amount approved by the Planning Department for a period of one-year from the date of the first occupancy permit. 22. The construction plans shall indicate the application of painted rooftop addressing plotted on a 9-inch grid pattern with 45-inch tall numerals spaced 9-inch apart. The numerals shall be painted with a standard 9-inch paint roller using fluorescent yellow paint applied over a contrasting background. The address shall be oriented to the street and placed as closely as possible to the edge of the building closest to the street. R:'d) PL2002\024)036 TR¢ Summit @ C~stal Ridg¢~Staff Report.doc DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 23. Unless otherwise noted, all conditions shall be completed by the Developer at no cost to any Government Agency. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the site plan all existing and proposed property lines, easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and revision. General Requirements 24. A Grading Permit for either rough and/or precise grading, including all on-site flat work and improvements, shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained street right-of-way. 25. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way. 26. All improvement plans and grading plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars. Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit 27. A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include all necessary erosion control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and private property. 28. The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works. 29. A Soil Report shall be prepared by a registered Soil or Civil Engineer and submitted to the Director of the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and pavement sections. 30. A Geological Report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address special study zones and the geological conditions of the site, and shall provide recommendations to mitigate the impact of ground shaking and liquefaction. 31. The Developer shall have a Drainage Study prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in accordance with City Standards identifying storm water runoff expected from this site and upstream of this site. The study shall identify all existing or proposed public or private drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. The study shall also analyze and identify impacts to downstream properties and provide specific recommendations to protect the properties and mitigate any impacts. Any upgrading or upsizing of downstream facilities, including acquisition of drainage or access easements necessary to make required improvements, shall be provided by the Developer. 32. The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No R:XD PX2002\02-0036 The summit ~ Crystal RidgeXStaff Report.doc grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or the project is shown to be exempt. 33. As deemed necessary by the Director of the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District City of Temecula Fire Prevention Bureau Planning Department Department of Public Works Building and Safety Department Rancho California Water District 34. The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject property. 35. Permanent landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department and the Department of Public Works for review and approval, 36. The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or slope easements for off-site work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public Works. 37. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by either cashier's check or money order, prior to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area drainage plan fee. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid. Prior to Issuance of a Building Permit 38. Improvement plans and/or precise grading plans shall conform to applicable City of Temecula Standards subject to approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works. The following design criteria shall be observed: a. Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over A.C. paving. b. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula Standard No. 207A. c. All concentrated drainage directed towards the public street shall be conveyed through undersidewalk drains. 39. The Developer shall construct the following public improvements to City of Temecula General Plan standards unless otherwise noted, Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of the Department of Public Works: a. Improve Ridge Park Drive (Principal Collector Highway Standards - 78' R/W) to include installation of utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer). 40. All access rights, easements for sidewalks for public uses shall be submitted and reviewed by the Director of the Department of Public Works and City Attorney and approved by City Council for dedication to the City where sidewalks meander through private property. RAD P~2002\02~036 The sun'ut @ Crystal Ridge~Staff Report.doc 13 41. The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance with the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered Civil Engineer, and the Soil Engineer shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions. 42. The Developer shall obtain/grant an easement for ingress and egress over the adjacent property. 43. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06. 44. The Developer shall record a written offer to participate in, and waive all rights to object to the formation of an Assessment District, a Community Facilities District, or a Bridge and Major Thoroughfare Fee District for the construction of the proposed Western Bypass Corridor in accordance with the General Plan. The form of the offer shall be subject to the approval of the City Engineer and City Attorney. Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy 45. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: a. Rancho California Water District b. Eastern Municipal Water District c. Department of Public Works 46. All public improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and City standards to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works. 47. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works. FIRE DEPARTMENT 48. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in force at the time of building plan submittal. 49. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all commercial buildings per CFC Appendix III.A, Table A-III-A-1. The developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 2000 GPM at 20 PSI residual operating pressure, plus an assumed sprinkler demand of 400 GPM for a total fire flow of 2400 GPM with a 2 hour duration. The required fire flow may be adjusted during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire Flow as given above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC 903.2, Appendix Ill-A) 50. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC Appendix Ill-B, Table A-III-B-1. A minimum of 2 hydrants, in a combination of on-site and off- R:',D P~2002\02~036 The Summit @ Crystal Ridge~Staff Report.doc 14 51. 52. 53. 54. 55. 56. 57. 58. 59. 60. site (6" x 4" x 2-2 1/2" outlets) shall be located on Fire Department access roads and adjacent public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 450 feet apart, at each intersection and shall be located no more than 225 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required. (CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix Ill-B) As required by the California Fire Code, when any portion of the facility is in excess of 150 feet from a water supply on a public street, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the facility, on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided. For this project on site fire hydrants are required. (CFC 903.2) Maximum cul-de-sac length shall not exceed 1320 feet. Minimum turning radius on any cul- de-sac shall be forty-five (45) feet. (CFC 902.2.2.2.3 and Subdivision Oral 16.03.020) If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection pdor to any building construction. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2) Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent roads are installed. Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface for 80,000 lbs. GVW. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2) Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved Fire Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or any portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface designed for 80,000 lbs. GVW with a minimum AC thickness of .25 feet. (CFC sec 902) Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13) feet six (6)inches. (CFC 902.2.2.1) The gradient for fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed fifteen (15) percent. (CFC 902.2.2.6 Oral. 99-14) Prior to building construction, dead end roadways and streets in excess of one hundred and fifty (150) feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of accommodating fire apparatus. (CFC 902.2.2.4) Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature block; and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. After the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be presented to the Fire Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system including fire hydrants shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building materials being placed on an individual lot. (CFC 8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and National Fire Protection Association 24 1-4.1 ) Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective Markers" shall be installed to identity fire hydrant locations. (CFC 901.4.3) R:',D Pk2002\02-0036 The Summit @ Crystal RidgeXStaff Report.doc 61. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, approved numbers or addresses shall be provided on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Numbers shall be of a contrasting color to their background. Commercial, multi-family residential and industrial buildings shall have a minimum twelve (12) inches numbers with suite numbers a minimum of six (6) inches in size. All suites shall give a minimum of six (6) inch high letters and/or numbers on both the front and rear doors. Single-family residences and multi-family residential units shall have four (4) inch letters and/or numbers, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 901.4.4) 62. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on square footage and type of construction, occupancy or use, the developer shall install a fire sprinkler system. Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. (CFC Article 10, CBC Chapter 9) 63. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on a requirement for monitoring the sprinkler system, occupancy or use, the developer shall install an fire alarm system monitored by an approved Underwriters Laboratory listed central station. Plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. (CFC Article 10) 64. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a "Knox-Box" shall be provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six (6) feet in height and be located to the right side of the main entrance door. (CFC 902.4) 65. All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry system for emergency access by fire fighting personnel. (CFC 902.4) 66. Prior to final inspection of any building, the applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire Department for approval, a site plan designating Fire Lanes with appropriate lane painting and or signs. Special Conditions 67. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final a simple plot plan and a simple floor plan, each as an electronic file of the .DWG format must be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau. Alternative file formats may be acceptable, contact fire prevention for approval. 68. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Fire Code permit process and update any changes in the items and quantities approved as part of their Fire Code permit. These changes shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for review and approval per the Fire Code and is subject to inspection. (CFC 105) 69. The applicant shall submit for review and approval by the Riverside County Department of Environmental Health and City Fire Department an update to the Hazardous Material Inventory Statement and Fire Department Technical Report on file at the city; should any quantities used or stored onsite increase or should changes to operation introduce any additional hazardous material not listed in existing reports. (CFC Appendix II-E) R:',D P~2002~02-0036 The Summit ~ Crystal RidgeXStaff Report.doc 16 COMMUNITY SERVICES General Conditions: 70. All parkway landscaping, slope areas and interior streetlights shall be maintained by the property owner or private maintenance association. 71. The Developer shall provide adequate space for a recycling bin within the trash enclosure areas. 72. The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of construction debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul construction debris. Prior to Building Permits: 73. If streetlights are installed as a result of this project, prior to issuance of building permits or installation of streetlights, whichever comes first, the developer shall file an application with the TCSD and pay the appropriate energy fees related to the transfer of said streetlights into the TCSD maintenance program. BUILDING AND SAFETY 74. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 1998 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 1998 National Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy and Disabled Access Regulations and the Temecula Municipal Code. 75. Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plans showing compliance with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All streetlights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way. 76. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted to the Building & Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School Mitigation Fees. 77. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. 78. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review. 79. Disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building is required. The path of travel shall meet the California Disabled Access Regulations in terms of cress slope, travel slope stripping and signage. Provide all details on plans. (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1, 1998) 80. All building and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations. Provide all details on plans. (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1, 1998) 81. Provide disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building. R:~D PX2002\024)036 The Summit @ Crystal Ridge'Staff Report.doc 17 82. Provide house electrical meter provisions for power for the operation of exterior lighting, fire alarm systems. 83. Restroom fixtures, number and type, to be in accordance with the provisions of the 1998 edition of the California Building Code Appendix 29. 84. Provide an approved automatic fire sprinkler system. 85. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans prior to permit issuance. 86. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic and mechanical plan for plan review. 87. Truss calculations that are stamped by the engineer of record and the truss manufacturer engineer are required for plan review submittal. 88. Provide precise grading plan for plan check submittal to check for handicap accessibility. 89. A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the building construction. 90. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standard and any block walls if not on the approved building plans, will require separate approvals and permits. 91. Show all building setbacks. 92. Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrance to the project that indicates the houm of construction, shown below, as allowed by the City of Temecula Ordinance No. 0-90-04, specifically Section G (1) of Riverside County Ordinance No. 457.73, for any site within one- quarter mile of an occupied residence. Monday-Friday: 6:30 a.m. - 6:30 p.m. Saturday: 7:00 a.m. - 6:30 p.m. No work is permitted on Sunday or Government Holidays OUTSIDE AGENCIES 93. The applicant shall comply with the attached letter dated February 21, 2002 from the California Historical Resources Information System. 94, The applicant shall comply with the attached letter dated March 23, 2002 from the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District. 95. The applicant shall comply with the attached letter dated January 31, 2002 from Rancho Water. 96. The applicant shall comply with the attached letter dated February 7, 2002 from County of Riverside Department of Environmental Health. R:~D PX2002\02-0036 The Surest @ Crystal Ridge~Staff Report.doc 18 By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be subject to Community Development Department approval. Applicant's Signature Name printed Date R:~D P~2002~02-0036 The Summit @ Crystal Ridge\StaffReporcdoc 19 FEB-21-2~2 1~:42 ~ALIFORNIA HISTORICAL RESOURCES ~NFORMATION ~YSTEM ARU~E I ~ANTHRO UCR 787 5~09 P. O1/B~ Eastern InformeUon Center Department of Anthropology Unlvem~ ct' carf~amts R;vsrs;de. ~ 9252t-0418 Fax (909) 787-S409 February 21, 2002 TO: Rick Rush City of Temecula Planning Department RE: Cultural Resource Review Case: PA 02-0036 Records at the Eastern Information Center of the California Historical Resources Information System have been reviewed to determine if this project would adversely affect prehistoric or historic cultural resources: The proposed project area has not been surveyed for cu rural resources and contains or is adjacent to known cultural resource(e), A Phase I study ie recommended. , ~, Based upon existing data the proposed project area has the potential for containing cultural resources. A Phase I study is recommended. ~ A Phase I cultural resource study (MF # ) identified one or more cultural resources. The project area contains, or has the possibility of containing, cultural resources. However, due to the nature of the project or prior data recovery studies, an adverse effect on cultural resources is not anticipated. Further study ie not recommended. ~ A Phase I cultural resource study {MF # ) identified no cultural resources. Further study is not recommended. ~ There Is a Iow probability of cultural resources. Further study is not recommended. If, during cons~uctlon, cultural resources are encountered, work should be halted or diverted in the immediate area while a qualified archaeologist evaluates the finds and makes recommendations, Due to the archaeological sensitivity of the area, earthmoving during construction should be monitored ~ by a professional'archaeologist. V' The submission of a cultural resource management report Is recommended following guidelines, for Archaeological Resource Management Reports prepared by ~he California Office of Historic Preservation, Press/vat/on P/anteing 8ul/erin 4(a), December 1989. _ Phase I Records search end field survey _ Phase II T.e.?.ting [Evaluate resource significance,, propose mitigation measures for "significant" s tee.] Phase III M~tlgation [Data recovery by excavation preservation in place, or a combination of the two.] Phase IV Monitor earthmoving activities COMMENTS: If you have any questions, please contact us. Eastern Information Canter EIC~FRMS~TI~NSMIT General Manager-Chief Engineer City of Temecu a pPlanning Department cst Office Box 9033 Temecula, California 92589-9033 RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT 1995 MARKET STREE RIVERSIDE, CA 92501 909/955-1200 909/788-9965 FAX 51180,1 Ladles and Gentlemen: Re: FA The District does not normally recommend conditions for land divis ons or other land use cases in incorporated cities. The District also does not plan check cit~ land use cases, or provide State Division of Real Estate letters or other flood hazard reports for such cases. Disthct comments/recommendations for such cases are normally limited to items of specific interest to the D strict including District Master Draina· Plan facilities, other re ional flood control and drainaqe facilities which could be considered a logical componen~or extension of a master ~3~n s stem, ~nrcdvi~ieS~ct Area Drainage Plan fees (development mitigation fees). In addition, information ora general nS~uSre is The District has not reviewed the proposed project in detail and the following checked comments do not in any way constitute or mply Disthct approval or endorsement of the proposed project with respect to flood hazard, public hea th and safety or any other such issue: This pr.oiect would not be impacted by District Master Drainage Plan facilities nor are other facilities of regional ~nterest proposed. This project involves District Master Plan facilities. The District will acce t ownershi of such facilities on written request of the City. Facilities must be constructed to District stan~rds, and ~°isthct plan check and inspection will be required for Disthct acceptance. Plan check inspection and administrative fees will be required _ This p[oject proposes channels, storm drains 36 inches or larger in diameter, or other facilities that could be considered regional in nature and/or a log cai extension of the adopted · ~mc[ stanaaros, an(3 ulstrict plan cnecK and inspect on will be required for District acceptance. Plan check, inspection and administrative fees will be required. I,~ This project is ocated within the limits of the Districts ~V~OI~i F_..T~t Drain. age Plan for which drainage fees have bee" ~donmd ............ ' Area cnecl( or money order only to the Flood Control D~stnct prior ~'o~ ssuance of b whichever comes first. Fees to be paid should be at the rate In effect at the fimeUl}~f~l~sgsu°rangcreadoi}l~hePear~iutaSl permit. GENERAL INFORMATION This project may require a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES permit from the State Water Resources Con[roi Board Clearance for grading, recordation, or oth(/r final apprevalshould not be given until the City has determ ned that the project has been granted a permit or is shown to be exempt. If this proiect involves a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA mapped flood plain then the C should require ~e app cant to provide all studies, calculafions, plans and o}{~er Information required to me~ FEMA requirements, and should further require that the applicant obtain a Conditional Letter of Map Revision CLOMR) oP(:~;aOngc~a, ding, recordation or other final approval 6f the project, and a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR(~ prior to If a natural watercourse or mapped flood plain is impacted by this project the City should require the a licant to obtain a Section 1601/1603 Agreement fr6m the Califomia Departmerit o~' Fish and Game and a Clean Pv~ater Act Section 404 Permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, or written correspondence from these a encies indicating the prgject is exempt from these .requirements. A C can Water Act Section 401 Water Quail Cert~cation ~lea~Y ibte required from the local California Regional Water QuaJity Control Board prior to issuance of it~e~ Corps 404 Very truly yours, STUART E. MCKIBBIN Senior Civil Engineer Date: m°'~~ January Rick Rush, Case Planner City of Temecula Planning Department 43200 Business Park Drive Post Office Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 SUBJECT: WATER AVAILABILITY PARCEL NO. 5 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 23968 APN 940-310-040 PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA02-0036 Dear Mr. Rush: Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located within the boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD). Water service, therefore, would be available upon completion of financial arrangements between RCWD and the property owner. If fire protection is required, the customer will need to contact RCWD foi fees and requirements. Water availability would be contingent upon the property owner signing an Agency Agreement that assigns water management rights, if any, to RCWD. If you hax(e any questions, please contact an Engineering Services Representative at this Office. Sincerely, RANCHO CAI.1FORNIA WATER DISTRICT Steve Brannon, P.E. Development Engineering Manager DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH Febmary 7, 2002 City of Tetnecula Planning Department P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589 RE: Plot Plan No. PA02-0036 FEB 1 1 2O02 Dear Rick Rush: 1. The Depamnent of Environmental Health has reviewed the Plot Plan No. PA02-00036 and has no objections. Sanitary sewer and water services are available in this area. 2. PRIOR TO ANY BUILDING PLAN C:H~;CK APPROVAL for Environmental Health clearance, the following items are required: a) "Will-serve" letters from the appropriate water and sewering agencies. b) e) If there are any proposed food facilities, three complete sets of plans for each food establishment (to include vending machines) will be submitted, including a fixture schedule, a finish schedule, and a plumbing schedule in order to ensure compliance with the California Uniform Retail Food Facilities Law. For specific reference, please contact Food Facility Plan examiners at (909) 600-6330). A clearance letter from the Hazardous Services Materials Management Branch (909) 358-5055 will be required indicating that the project has been cleared for: · Underground storage tanks, Ordinance #617.4. · Hazardous Waste Generator Services, Ordinance #6 l 5.3. · Hazardous Waste Disclosure (in accordance with Ordinance #651.2. · Waste Reduction Management 3. Waste Regulation Branch (Waste Collection/Lea). Sincerely, ~onmental Health Specialist (909) 955-8980 NOTE: Any current additional requirements not covered can be applicable at time of Building Plan review for final Department of Environmental Health clearance. cc: Doug Thompson, Hazardous Materials Local Enforcement Agency · RO. Box 1280, Riverside, CA 92502-1280 , (909) 955-8982 · FAX (909) 781-9653 · 4080 Lemon Street, 9th Floor, Riverside, CA 92501 Land Use and Water Engineering · RO. Box 1206, Riverside, CA 92502-1206 · (909) 955-8980 · FAX (909) 955-8903 · 4080 Lemon Stree, 2nd Floor, Riverside, CA 92501 ATTACHMENT NO. 2 EXHIBITS R:~D 1~2002\02-0036 2l~e Summit @ Crystal Ridge~Staff Report.dec 20 CITY OF TEMECULA P, ANC~fO CASE NO. - PA02-0036 EXHIBIT - A PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - June 26, 2002 VICINITY MAP R:',D I:A2002~02-0036 The Summit @ Crystal Ridge\Staff Report.doc CITY OF TEMECULA EXHIBIT B --, GENERAL PLAN MAP DESIGNATION -(BP) Business Park EXHIBIT C - ZONING DESIGNATION - (BP) Business Park CASE NO. - PA02-0035 PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - June 26, 2002 R:~D P',2002~02-0036 The Summit @ Crystal Ridge\Staff Report.doc CITY OF TEMECULA PARCEL / ~A..RCEL 3 E~ PARCEL ./ PARCEL 4 CASE NO. - PA02-0036 EXHIBIT - D PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - June 26, 2002 SITE PLAN RAD P~2002~02-0036 The Summit @ Crystal Ridge~Staff Report.doc 23 CITY OF TEMECULA CASE NO. - PA02-0036 EXHIBIT - E PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - June 26, 2002 GRADING PLAN R:'~D P~2002~2-0036 The Summit @ Crystal Ridge\Staff Report.doc 24 CITY OF TEMECULA F..A~T EL~v'A'I'[ON $OUTI-I ELEVATION NORTH ~LEVATION ~ mx .WATION CASE NO. - PA02-0036 EXHIBIT - F PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - June 26, 2002 BUILDING ELEVATIONS R:~D P~002~02-0036 The Summit @ C~jstal Ridge\Staff Report.doc 25 CITY OF TEMECULA CASE NO. - PA02-0036 EXHIBIT - G PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - June 26, 2002 FLOOR PLAN R:~D P~2002~02-0036 The Summit @ Cp/stal Ridge\Staff Report.doc CITY OF TEMECULA PARCEL I PARCEL 2 PARCEL 3 EX. BLDG PARCEL 4 CASE NO. - PA02-0036 EXHIBIT - H PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - June 26, 2002 LANDSCAPE PLAN R:~D P\2002~02-0036 The Summit @ Crystal Ridge\Staff Report.doc 27 ITEM #7 STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION June 26, 2002 Planning Application No. 01-0648 (Development Plan) Prepared By: Matthew Harris, Associate Planner ADOPT a Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. 01-0648 (Development Plan) based on the Determination of Consistency with a project for which an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was previously certified pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 - Subsequent EIR's and Negative Declarations. 2. ADOPT a Resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 01- 0648, DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT, ESTABLISH AND OPERATE TWO, THREE-STORY BUILDINGS CONSISTING OF 102 DWELLING UNITS AS AN EXPANSION TO THE FOUNTAINS AT TEMECULA SENIOR APARTMENT COMMUNITY ON A 3.4 ACRE SITE KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 920-090-006. APPLICATION INFORMATION APPLICANT: Fountain Glen Properties PROPOSAL: A Development Plan proposal to construct and operate two three story building (totaling 47,655 square feet and 48,930 square feet) with a total of 102-apartment unit as an expansion of the Fountains at Temecula Senior Apartment Community. LOCATION: Northwest corner of Nicholas Road and Winchester Road Known as Assessor's Parcel Number 920-090-006 EXISTING ZONING: Planned Development Overlay -3 SURROUNDING ZONING: North: Medium Density Residential (M) South: Public Institutional (PI) East: Roripaugh Specific Plan (SP-1) West: Medium Density Residential (M) GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Business Park (BP) R:\D PX2001\01-0648 Fountains Expansion\Staff Report and COAs,doc EXISTING LAND USE: Vacant SURROUNDING LAND USES: North: Santa Gertrudis Creek Channel/Residential South: Existing Senior Apartments & Chapparal High School East: Vacant West: Residential PROJECT STATISTICS (DEVELOPMENT PLAN) Lot area (net) 3.4 Acre Footprint: Building E - 16,520 square feet Building F - 16,310 square feet Building square footage: Building E - 47,655 square feet Building F - 48,930 square feet Building height: 30 feet for two story building 42 feet for three story buildings Landscaped area: 52,755 square feet (36.0%) Parking Required: Senior Housing (1/2 covered spaces per unit) +1 uncovered space per 5 units for guest parking Total 51 spaces 20 spaces 71 spaces Parking Provided: Covered Uncovered Handicapped Total 56 spaces 73 spaces 5 spaces 134 spaces Lot coverage: 40% Required/22% Provided BACKGROUND On June 2, 1999, the Planning Commission approved PA98-0512, a Development Plan to construct and operate a 244 unit senior apartment complex. The complex, which has been constructed, consists of two, three-story apartment buildings and associated outdoor recreational facilities on 8.3 acres. The applicant is now proposing to expand the complex by constructing an additional 102 apartment units, a "community room" and associated outdoor recreational facilities on a separate 3.4 acre parcel directly adjacent to the existing site. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The applicant proposes to construct two additional senior (55 years of age and older) apartment buildings onsite. Both buildings will be three-stories in height. Building E has a total floor area of 47,655 square feet and includes an approximately 1,000 square foot "community room". Building F has a total floor area of 48,930 square feet. A mix of one and two bedroom units will be provided within the buildings. Both of the buildings are generally "L" shaped and sited in the center of the project area. A forty-foot separation will be achieved between the two buildings. Building F will have an appreximately 75-foot setback from the Winchester Road right-of-way. The main entrance of Building E will be odented toward the south and will be connected to the existing adjacent apartment R:XD P~2001\014)648 Fountains ExpansionXStaff Repmt and COAs.doc 2 complex via a decoratively paved walkway. Secondary entrances will be provided along the north, east and west sides of the building so as to provide adequate pedestrian circulation within the complex. Entrances to Building F will be provided on the south, east, and west sides of the building. Access to individual apartments will be from inside the structures. No units are designed to have direct outside entries. Several exterior amenities will be provided around the periphery of the buildings including a patio, fire pit and spa off the community room and horseshoe pits located on the north side of Building F. Residents will have access to the recreational facilities within the existing complex. Pdmary access to the site will be from a single driveway off Nicholas Road that serves as the main entrance to the existing apartment complex. A second gated driveway will be provided off of Winchester Road Onsite parking will be located along the north, east and west sides of the buildings. The architectural design of the apartment buildings will match the existing buildings onsite. Elements of the "Craftsman" style will be utilized with clean lines, exposed beams, Iow sloping rooflines with gables, and neutral tones. The fascias of the buildings will be finished with a wood float stucco finish in light shades of gray, beige, and tan. To add relief, the exterior walls will have multiple planes giving the building fascia depth. The windows will be recessed and the second and third floors will appear to step back from the lower floors. Each unit will have either a patio or a balcony with stucco walls on the ground floor patios and wrought iron on the upper floor balconies. Stacked sandstone veneer will enhance entry points around the buildings. Roof colors will be a mix of light and dark grays and grayish-tan concrete tiles. The exposed wood fascia and outlooker beams will be finished with light olive green for accent coloring. With regard to landscaping, ten different varieties of trees will be utilized around the periphery of the buildings including but not limited to Italian Cypress, African Sumac, Italian Stone Pines and California Fan Palms. Moreover, a large variety of shrubs will be utilized around the base of the buildings including but not limited to India Hawthorn, New Zealand Flax, Heavenly Bamboo and Daylilies. Groundcover and turf will also be utilized around the buildings. The periphery of the parking area will be provided with a mixture of Carrot wood and London Plane Trees and assorted shrubbery. A row of six African Sumac trees will be planted along the site's Winchester Road Frontage. ANALYSIS Building Design The building design is consistent with the requirements of the Development Code, and Design Guidelines and is consistent with the existing buildings onsite. The proposed building facades provide significant articulation so as to eliminate a "box-like" look. Moreover, significant relief and a variety of materials have been applied to the buildings that serve to avoid monotonous lines. Multiple roof pitches and window types provide visual interest. The scale, form and colors of the buildings are in proportion with the surrounding area. Landscaping The landscape plan conforms to the landscape requirements of the Development Code and Design Guidelines. Thirty-six percent of the expansion area has been landscaped. This exceeds the twenty-five percent minimum landscaping requirement in the Business Park (BP) zone. Tree placement adjacent to the buildings will serve to effectively soften the building elevations. In addition, 36" box trees have been strategically located at building corners and entrances so as to provide immediate height, vegetation and identification. Ornamental trees have been located in R:',D PX2001\014)648 Fountains Eotpansion\Staff Report and COAs.doc 3 proximity to outdoor amenities and water features to enhance their aesthetics. The trees and shrubbery proposed along the northern property line will provide screening of the complex from the adjacent public multi-use trail. Site Plan The project conforms to all of the development regulations of the Business Park (BP) zoning district. The building setbacks exceed the minimum requirements of the Development Code. The proposed 22% lot coverage is well below the maximum permitted lot coverage of 40%. The building complies with maximum floor area ratio requirements. With regard to onsite parking, the City's Development Code requires Y2 covered spaces per unit (102 / Y2 = 51 ) and one uncovered space per five units for guest parking (102 / 5 = 20). As designed the applicant is proposing 56 covered stalls, 5 handicapped and 73 additional stalls for a total of 134 parking stalls. The site provides 63 more parking stalls than required. The applicant indicates that they need one space for each unit in the complex and that reduces the number of extra spaces down to 32.Staff believes the distribution of the parking is both functional and accessible to all building entry points. The subject property abuts an existing multi-use trail within the Santa Gertrudis Creek Flood Control Channel. Currently, no direct access exists between the trail and either the existing apartment complex or proposed expansion area. Onsite residents must now travel a significant distance in order to access the trail. Given the large number of both existing and proposed dwelling units within the complex, staff believes that a direct access point(s) is warranted between the complex and the trail (see Condition of Approval Nos. 13 & 14). Access and Circulation The Public Works Department has analyzed the projected traffic impact of the project and determined that the impacts are consistent with the traffic volumes projected for the site by the previously adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration. All frontage improvements were provided in association with the development of the existing apartment complex onsite and no additional improvements are being required. The Fire Department has also reviewed the plan and determined that there is proper access and circulation to provide emergency services to the site. Environmental Determination In June of 1999, an Initial Study was prepared and a Mitigated Negative Declaration adopted in association with the establishment of a Planned Development Overlay (PDO-3) zoning designation on the subject property. This analysis included potential environmental impacts associated with senior housing, which was included as a permitted use under the Planned Development Overlay. The study determined that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, the effects will not be significant with the implementation of mitigation measures. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no additional environmental analysis is required given that: 1. No substantial changes are proposed requiring major revisions to the previous Negative Declaration. 2. No substantial changes are proposed due to new significant environmental effects. 3. No new information has been identified requiring additional mitigation measures er alternatives. As a result staff is recommending that a De Minimus Impact Finding be made. R:~D P~200IX01-0648 Fountains Expansion,Staff Report and COAs,doe 4 CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION Staff has determined that the proposed project is consistent with the City's Design Guidelines and conforms to all of the applicable development regulations. Staff recommends approval of the Development Plan with the attached conditions of approval. FINDINGS Development Plan (Section 17.05.010F) The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan and with all applicable requirements of state law and other City ordinances. The plan to develop a 96,585 square foot, senior housing complex expansion consisting of 102 dwelling units is consistent with the Planned Development Overlay, Business Park (BP) policies, City-Wide Design Guidelines and development regulations. The proposed plan incorporates architectural and landscape designs, which will achieve the City's General Plan Community Design Goal #3, "Preservation and enhancement of the positive qualities of individual districts or neighborhoods ". The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The project has been conditioned to conform to the Uniform Building Code, and ail construction will be inspected by City staff prior to occupancy. The Fire Department staff has also found that the site design will provide adequate emergency access in the case of a need for emergency response.to the site. Attachments: PC Resolution No. - 02- - Blue Page 6 Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 9 Exhibits - Blue Page 22 A. Vicinity Map B. General Plan Map C. Zoning Map D. Site Plan E. Grading Plan F. Building Elevations G. Floor Plan H. Landscape Plan R:~D P~2001\01~648 Fountains Expansion~Staff Report and COAs.doc 5 ATFACHMENT NO. 1 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2002- R:~D PX2001\0I 4ff~48 Fountains Expansion~Staff Report and COAs.doc 6 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 01- 0648, DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT, ESTABLISH AND OPERATE TWO, THREE-STORY BUILDINGS CONSISTING OF 102 DWELLING UNITS AS AN EXPANSION TO THE FOUNTAINS AT TEMECULA SENIOR APARTMENT COMMUNITY ON A 3.4 ACRE SITE KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 920-090-006. WHEREAS, Fountain Glen Properties, filed Planning Application No. PA01-0648 Development Plan "Application"), in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code; WHEREAS, the Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application on June 28, 2002, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission recommended approval of the Application subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder; WHEREAS, all legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. reference. The above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by Section 2. Findinqs. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby makes the following findings as required by Section 176.05.01 OF of the Temecula Municipal Code: The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan and with all applicable requirements of state law and other City ordinances. The plan to develop a 96,585 square foot, senior housing complex expansion consisting of 102 dwelling units is consistent with the Planned Development Overlay, Business Park (BP) policies, City-Wide Design Guidelines and development regulations. The proposed plan incorporates architectural and landscape designs, which will achieve the City's General Plan Community Design Goal #3, "Preservation and enhancement of the positive qualities of individual districts or neighborhoods". The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The project has been conditioned to conform to the Uniform Building Code, and all construction will be inspected by City staff prior to occupancy. The Fire Department staff has also found that the site design will provide adequate emergency access in the case of a need for emergency response to the site. R:XD PX2001\01-0648 Fountains Expansion~Staff Report and COAs.doc 7 Section3. Environmental Compliance. The project will have no significant environmental impacts and has been found to be categorically exempt, Pursuant to Section 15162 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines. Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby conditionally approves the Application, a request to develop a 96,585 square foot, 102 unit expansion to an existing senior apartment complex set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference together with any and all necessary conditions that may be deemed necessary. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 26th day of June 2002. ATTEST: Dennis Chiniaeff, Chairperson Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that PC Resolution No. 02-__was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 26th day of June, 2002, by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary R:'~D Px2001\01-0648 Fountains Expansion\Staff Report and COAs.doc 8 EXHIBIT A CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL R:~,D PX2001\01 ~648 Fountains Expansion~Staff Reporl and COAs.doc EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: Project Description: DIF Category: Assessor's Parcel No.: Approval Date: Expiration Date: PA01-0648 Development Plan A proposal to construct and operate two three story building (totaling 47,655 square feet and 48,930 square feet) with a total of 102-apartment unit on a 3.4 acre portion of an 11.7 acre site as an expansion of the Fountains at Temecula Senior Apartment Community. Single-Family Detached 920-090-006 June 26, 2002 June 26, 2004 PLANNING DIVISION Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project 1. The applicant shall deliver to the Community Development Department- Planning Division a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty- Four Dollars ($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption required under Public Resources Code Section 21108(b) and California Code of Regulations Section 15075. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant has not delivered to the Community Development Department - Planning Division the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition [Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)]. General Requirements 2. The permittee/applicant shall indemnify, defend with counsel of Cites own election, and hold harmless, the City and any agency or instrumentality thereof, and/or any of its officers, employees, and agents from any and ali claims, actions, or proceedings against the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its officers, employees, and agents, to attack, set aside, void, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting from an approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application which action is brought within the appropriate statute of limitations period and Public Resources Code, Division 13, Chapter 4 (Section 21000 et seq., including but not by the way of limitations Section 21152 and 21167). The City shall promptly notify the permittee/applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding brought forth within this time period. The City shall estimate the cost of the defense of the action and applicant shall deposit said amount with the City. City may require additional deposits to cover anticipated costs. City shall refund, without interest, any unused portions of the deposit once the litigation is finally concluded. Should the City fail to either promptly notify or cooperate fully, R:~D P~2001\01A~648 Fountains Expansion,Staff Rcpor~ and COAs.doc ~0 permittee/applicant shall not, thereafter be responsible to indemnify, defend, protect, or hold harmless the City, any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its officers, employees, or agents. This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. Ail conditions shall be complied with prior to any occupancy or use allowed by this Development Plan. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this development plan. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibit "D" (Site Plan), contained on file with the Community Development Department - Planning Division. Additionally, the following criteria must be met prior to development of the project: a. The installation of the off site enhanced pavement between this project site and the existing site, as depicted on the site plan, shall be install in conjunction with this project's development. b. The construction drawings shall indicate coordination and grouping of all utilities, which are to be screened from view per applicable City Codes and guidelines. c. All ground mounted utility/mechanical equipment shall be located such that they are not placed in prominent locations visible to the public unless they can be place underground, sited on the interior of the site, or screened to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning. d. Provide the Planning Department with a copy of the underground water plans and electrical plans for verification of acceptable placement of the transformer and the double detector check valves prior to final agreement with the utility companies. Building elevations shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibit "E" (Building Elevations), contained on file with the Community Development Department - Planning Division. Additionally, the following criteria must be met prior to development of the project: a. All mechanical and roof-mounted equipment shall be hidden by building elements that were designed for that purpose as an integral part of the building. When0 determined to be necessary by the Director of Planning, the parapet will be raised to provide for this screening. b. Further accenting shall be provided to the ends of both buildings such as pitched roof eave projections over ground level access door to utility rooms and the trash enclosure roll-up door. c. The end of the covered carport adjacent to the Santa Gurtudis Creek and nearest Winchester Road shall be constructed with a full wall to screen the vehicles. Landscaping shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibit "F" (Landscape Plan), contained on file with the Community Development Department - Planning Division. Additionally, the following criteria must be met prior to development of the project: a. The construction landscape drawings shall indicate all utilities, which are to be screened from view per applicable City Codes and guidelines. R:~D 1~2001\0143648 Fountains Expansion\Staff Report and COAs.doc 10. Landscaping installed for the project shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibit "F" (Landscape Plan) and be continuously maintained to the reasonable satisfaction of the Director of Planning. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the Director of Planning shall have the authority to require the property owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any successors in interest. The colors and materials for the project shall substantially conform to those noted directly below and with Exhibit "H" (Color and Material Board), contained on file with the Community Development Department - Planning Division. Exterior Plaster in wood float sand finish Wood Facia and Exposed Wood Trim La Habra Plaster Co. #x9511 (grey) La Habra Plaster Co. #x3713 (beige) La Habra Plaster Co. #x80220 (tan) Olympic Satin "Outside White" Accent Color on handrails, gutters and downspouts Frazee 4904D (light olive green) Tile Roof Pioneer Concrete Roof Tiles WS-503 (dark grey) Pioneer Concrete Roof Tiles WS-516 (medium grey) Pioneer Concrete Roof Tiles WS-472 (tan/gray) 11. The applicant shall comply with all mitigation measures contained in the approved Mitigation Monitoring Program approved under PA98-0511 (PDO-3), which sets the development criteria for this property. 12. The owner shall provide a public access easement between the terminus of Nicholas Road and the existing Santa Gertrudis Creek multi-use trail subject to the review and approval of the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District and the City of Temecula. 13. The owner shall provide an access gate between the project site and the Santa Gertrudis Creek multi-use trail. The specific location(s) and design of the access point(s) shall be reviewed and approved by the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District and the City of Temecula. 14. Should access to the Santa Gertrudis Creek multi-use trail not be attainable by the applicant or the City after a good faith effort with the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, the applicant shall install a pedestrian access (handicap accessible) between Building "F" and the sidewalk along Winchester Road. Such access shall be installed prior to final occupancy. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits 15. The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be provided by the Community Development Department - Planning Division staff, and return one signed set to the Community Development Department - Planning Division for their files. 16. The applicant shall submit to the Community Development Department - Planning Division for permanent filing two (2) 8" X 10" glossy photographic color prints of the approved Color and Materials Board and of the colored version of approved Exhibit "F", the colored architectural elevations to the Community Development Department - Planning Division for their files. All labels on the Color and Materials Board and Elevations shall be readable on the photographic prints. R:~D P~2001\01~o48 Foun~ins Expansion~Slaff Report and COAs.doc t2 17, The applicant shall submit a parking lot lighting plan to the Planning Department, which meets the requirements of the Development Code and the Palomar Lighting Ordinance. The parking lot light standards shall be placed in such a way as to not adversely impact the growth potential of the parking lot trees. 18. A copy of the Grading Plan shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Department. 19. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that Ordinance or by providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit 20. An appropriate method for screening the gas meters and other externally mounted utility equipment shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department. 21. A Consistency Check fee shall be paid per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule. 22. Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Department - Planning Division. These plans shall conform substantially with the approved Exhibit "H", or as amended by these conditions. The location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The plans shall be accompanied by the following items: a, Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal). b. One (1) copy of the approved grading plan. c. Water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water Efficient Ordinance). d. Total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with approved plan). e. A landscape maintenance program shall be submitted for approval, which details the proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials to assure proper growth and landscape development for the long term esthetics of the property. The approved maintenance program shall be provided to the landscape maintenance contractor who shall be responsible to carry out the detailed program. Prior to Building Occupancy 23. The property owner shall fully install all required landscaping and irrigation, and submit a landscape maintenance bond in a form and amount approved by the Planning Department for a period of one-year from the date of the first occupancy permit. 24. The construction plans shall indicate the application of painted rooftop addressing plotted on a 9-inch grid pattern with 45-inch tall numerals spaced 9-inch apart. The numerals shall be painted with a standard 9-inch paint roller using fluorescent yellow paint applied over a contrasting background. The address shall be oriented to the street and placed as closely as possible to the edge of the building closest to the street. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 25. Unless otherwise noted, all conditions shall be completed by the Developer at no cost to any Government Agency. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the site plan all existing and proposed proper~J lines, easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and revision. R?,D PX200I\01-0648 Fountains Expansion~Staff Report and COAs.doc ~3 General Requirements 26. A Grading Permit for either rough and/or precise grading, including all on-site flat work and improvements, shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained street right-of-way. 27. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way. 28. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the California Department of Transportation prior to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed State right-of- way. 29. The vehicular movement for the driveway on Winchester Road is restricted to right-in/right- out. 30. All improvement plans and grading plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars. Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit 31. A copy of the grading, improvement plans, along with supporting hydrologic and hydraulic calculations shall be submitted to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District for approval prior to the issuance of any permit. 32. A permit from Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District is required for work within their right-of-way. 33. A permit from the Army Corps of Engineers is required for any work within the Santa Gertrudis Channel. 34. A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include all necessary erosion control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and pdvate property. 35. The Developer shall post secudty and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works. 36. A Soil Report shall be prepared by a registered Soil or Civil Engineer and submitted to the Director of the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and pavement sections. 37. A Geological Report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address special study zones and the geological conditions of the site, and shall provide recommendations to mitigate the impact of ground shaking and liquefaction. 38. The Developer shall have a Drainage Study prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in accordance with City Standards identifying storm water runoff expected from this site and upstream of this site. The study shall identify all existing or proposed public or private drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. The studyshall also analyze and identify impacts to downstream properties and provide specific recommendations to protect the properties and mitigate any impacts. Any upgrading or upsizing of downstream facilities, including acquisition of drainage or access easements necessary to make required improvements, shall be provided by the Developer. R:\D P~2001\01-0648 Fountains ~xp~msion\Staff Report and COAs.doc 14 39. The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or the project is shown to be exempt. 40. The Developer shall obtain an encroachment permit from Caltrans prior to commencement of any construction within the existing State right-of-way, including the proposed driveway. 41. As deemed necessary by the Director of the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: a. San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board b. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District c. Army Corps of Engineers d. Planning Department e. Department of Public Works 42. The Developer shall comply with all constraints, which may be shown upon an Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject property. 43. Permanent landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department and the Department of Public Works for review and approval. 44. The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or slope easements for off-site work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public Works. 45. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by either cashier's check or money order, prior to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area drainage plan fee. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid. 46. The site is in an area identified on the Flood Insurance Rate Map as Flood Zone A. This project shall comply with Chapter 15, Section 15.12 of the City Municipal Code, which may include obtaining a Letter of Map Revision from FEMA. A Flood Plain Development Permit shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval. Prior to Issuance of s Building Permit 47. Improvement plans and/or precise grading plans shall conform to applicable City of Temecula Standards subject to approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works. The following design criteria shall be observed: a. Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over A.C. paving. b. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula Standard No. 207A. c. Concrete sidewalks and ramps shall be constructed along public street frontages in accordance with City of Temecula Standard Nos. 400, 401and 402. d. All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees. e. Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility. f. All concentrated drainage directed towards the public street shall be conveyed through under sidewalk drains. The Developer shall construct the following public improvements to City of Temecula General Plan standards unless otherwise noted. Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of the Department of Public Works: 48. R:~D P~2001\01-0048 Fountains Expansion\Staff Report and COAs.doc 15 a. Improve Winchester Road (Urban Arterial Highway Standards - 134' R/W) to include installation of sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer). 49. The Developer shall construct the following public improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works. a. Street improvements, which may include, but not limited to: sidewalks, drive approaches, signing, striping b. Storm drain facilities c. Sewer and domestic water systems d. Under grounding of proposed utility distribution lines 50. Bus bays will be designed at all existing and proposed bus stops as directed by Riverside Transit Agency and approved by the Department of Public Works. 51. All access rights, easements for sidewalks for public uses shall be submitted and reviewed by the Director of the Department of Public Works and City Attorney and approved by City Council for dedication to the City where sidewalks meander through private property. 52. The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance with the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered Civil Engineer, and the Soil Engineer shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions. 53. The Developer shall obtain/grant an easement for ingress, egress and parking over the adjacent property. 54. An easement for a joint use driveway shall be provided prior to the issuance of building permit. 55. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06. Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy 56. The existing Memorandum of Understanding between the City and Caltrans dated October 13, 1995 shall be amended to allow a right-in/right-out vehicular movement onto Winchester Road. 57. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: a. Rancho California Water District b. Eastern Municipal Water District c. Department of Public Works 58. Corner property line cut off shall be required per Riverside County Standard No. 805. 59. All public improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and City standards to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works. 60. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works. FIRE DEPARTMENT 61. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes that are in foroe at the time of building plan submittal. 62. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for Commeroial land division per CFC Appendix Ill-A, Table A-III-A-1. The applicant shallprovide at time ofplan review a copy of the original conditions of approval showing the originally required fire flow, AND a current fire flow test meeting those standards. If the applicant is unable to provide the original conditions of approval this project will be required to provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 4000 GPM at 20-PSI residual operating pressure with a 4 hour duration. The required fire flow may be adjusted during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire Flow as given above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC 903.2, Appendix Ill-A) 63. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC Appendix Ill-B, Table A-III-B~1. The applicant shall provide at time of plan review a copy of the original conditions of approval showing the originally required fire hydrant spacing and distances for this land~site, AND current evidence of meeting those standards. If the applicant is unable to provide the original conditions of approval this project will be required to provide 7 super fire hydrants (6" x 4" x 2-2 1/2" outlets) located on Fire Department access roads and adjacent public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced 250 feet apart, at each intersection and shall be located no more than 150 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required tiro flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required. (CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix Ill-B) 64. As required by the California Fire Code, when any portion of the facility is in excess of 150 feet from a water supply on a public street, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the facility, on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided. For this project on site fire hydrants are required. (CFC 903.2) 65. Maximum cul-de-sac length shall not exceed 1320 feet. Minimum turning radius on any cul- de-sac shall be forty-five (45) feet. (CFC 902.2.2.2.3 and Subdivision Ord 16.03.020) 66. If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and tiro protection prior to any building construction. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2) 67. Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent roads are installed. Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface for 80,000 lbs. GVW. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2) 68. Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved Fire Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or any portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface designed for 80,000 lbs. GV~N with a minimum AC thickness of .25 feet. ( CFC sec 902) 69. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13) feet six (6) inches. (CFC 902.2.2.1) 70. The gradient for fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed fifteen (15) percent. (CFC 902.2.2.6 Ord. 99-14) R:~D P~2001\01-0648 Fountains Expansion~Staff Report and COAs.doc 17 71. Prior to building construction, dead end mad ways and streets in excess of one hundred and fifty (150) feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of accommodating fire apparatus. (CFC 902.2.2.4) 72. Prior to building construction, this development shall have two (2) points of access, via all- weather sur[ace roads, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 902.2.1) 73. Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature block; and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. After the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be presented to the Fire Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system including fire hydrants shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building materials being placed on an individual lot. (CFC 8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and NFPA 24 1-4.1) 74. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective Markers" shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations. (CFC 901.4.3) 75. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, approved numbers or addresses shall be provided on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Numbers shall be of a contrasting color to their background. Commercial, multi-family residential and industrial buildings shall have a minimum twelve (12) inches numbers with suite numbers a minimum of six (6) inches in size. All suites shall give a minimum of six (6) inch high letters and/or numbers on both ,the front and rear doors. Single family residences and multi-family residential units shall have four (4) inch letters and/or numbers, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 901.4.4) 76. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a directory display monument sign shall be required for apartment, condominium, townhouse or mobile home parks. Each complex shall have an illuminated diagrammatic layout of the complex which indicates the name of the complex, all streets, building identification, unit numbers, and fire hydrant locations within the complex. Location of the sign and design specifications shall be submitted to and be approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau prior to installation. 77. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on square footage and type of construction, occupancy or use, the developer shall install a fire sprinkler system. Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. (CFC Article 10, CBC Chapter 9) 78. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on a requirement for monitoring the sprinkler system, occupancy or use, the developer shall install an fire alarm system monitored by an approved Underwriters Laboratory listed central station. Plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. (CFC Article 10) 79. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a "Knox-Box" shall be provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six (6) feet in height and be located to the right side of the main entrance door. (CFC 902.4) 80. All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry system for emergency access by fire fighting personnel. (CFC 902.4) 81. Prior to final inspection of any building, the applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire Department for approval, a site plan designating Fire Lanes with appropriate lane painting and or signs. R:~D P~2001\01 ~o48 Fountains Expansion~taff Repo~ and COAs.doc 18 Special Conditions 82. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final simple plot and floor plans, each as an electronic file of the DWG format must be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau. Alternative file formats may be acceptable, contact fire prevention for approval. 83. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Fire Code permit process and update any changes in the items and quantities approved as part of their Fire Code permit. These changes shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for review and approval per the Fire Code and is subject to inspection. (CFC 105) 84. The applicant shall submit for review and approval by the Riverside County Department of Environmental Health and City Fire Department an update to the Hazardous Matedal inventory Statement and Fire Department Technical Report on file at the city; should any quantities used or stored onsite increase or should changes to operation introduce any additional hazardous material not listed in existing reports. (CFC Appendix II-E) BUILDING AND SAFETY 85. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 1998 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 1998 National Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy and Disabled Access Regulations and the Temecula Municipal Code. 86. Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plans showing compliance with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All street lights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way. 87. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted to the Building & Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School Mitigation Fees. 88. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. 89. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review. 90. Disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building is required. The path of travel shall meet the California Disabled Access Regulations in terms of cross slope, travel slope stripping and signage. Provide all details on plans. (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1, 1998) All building and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations. Provide all details on plans. (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1, 1998) Provide disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building. Provide van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entry. Provide house electrical meter provisions for power for the operation of exterior lighting, fire alarm systems. Restroom fixtures, number and type, to be in accordance with the provisions of the 1998 edition of the California Building Code Appendix 29. Provide an approved automatic fire sprinkler system. 91. 92. 93. 94. 95. 96. R:kD PX2001\01-0648 Fountains ExpansionXStaff Rcpon and COAs.doc 19 97. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans prior to permit issuance. 98. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic and mechanical plan for plan review. 99. Truss calculations that are stamped by the engineer of record and the truss manufacturer engineer are required for plan review submittal. 100. Provide precise grading plan for plan check submittal to check for handicap accessibility. 101. A pro-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the building construction. 102. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standard and any block walls if not on the approved building plans, will require separate approvals and permits. 103. Show all building setbacks. 104. Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrance to the project that indicates the hours of construction, shown below, as allowed by the City of Temecula Ordinance No. 0-90-04, specifically Section G (1) of Riverside County Ordinance No. 457.73, for any site within one- quarter mile of an occupied residence. Monday-Friday: 6:30 a.m. - 6:30 p.m. Saturday: 7:00 a.m. - 6:30 p.m. No work is permitted on Sunday or Government Holidays COMMUNITY SERVICES General Requirements 105. The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of construction debris. Onlythe City's franchisee may haul construction debris. 106. The developer shall provide adequate space for a recycling bin within the trash enclosure areas. 107. All parkways, open space areas, and landscaping shall be maintained bythe property owner or a private maintenance association. 108. During construction, the developer shall provide temporary measures acceptable to the Department of Public Works and the Community Services Department for the protection of the Santa Gertrudis Recreational trail from any silt, drainage, or other construction debris. Prior to Building Permits 109. The developer shall satisfy the City's parkland dedication requirement (Quimby) through the payment of in-lieu fees equivalent to .62 acres of parkland, based upon the City's then current land evaluation. Said requirement includes a 50% credit for private recreational opportunities provided on-site and shall be pro-rated at a per dwelling unit cost prior to the issuance of building permits. 110. The developer shall pay the Park and Recreation, as well as, the Library component of DIF at the rate regularly collect by the City for attached residential at the time building permits aro issued. R:XD PX2001\01-0648 Fountains Expansion\Staff Report and COAs.doc 20 111. Prior to issuance of Building permits or installation of streetlights, whichever comes first, the developer shall file an application with the TCSD and pay the appropriate energy fees related to the transfer of said streetlights into the TCSD maintenance program. Prior to Certificates of Occupancy 112. After construction and prior to certificates of occupancy, the developer shall provide permanent measures acceptable to the Department of Public Works and the Community Services Department for the protection of the Santa Gertrudis Recreational Trail from silt and drainage. OUTSIDE AGENCIES 113. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Rancho California Water District transmittal dated December 31, 2001. 114. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Riverside County Department of Environmental Health transmittal dated January 11,2002. 115. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District transmittal dated March 25, 2002. 116. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Airport Land Use Commission's transmittal dated January 9, 2002, a copy of which is attached.. By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be subject to Community Development Department approval. Applicant's Signature Date Name printed R:XD PX2001\01-0648 Fountains Expansion~Staff Report and COAs.doc 21 December 31, 2001 2002 Thomas Thomsley, Case Planner City of Temecula Planning Department 43200 Business Park Drive Post Office Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 SUBJECT: WATER AVAILABILITY A PORTION OF LOT NO. 181 OF MAP BOOK 8, PAGE 359 APN 920-090-006 PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA01-0648 'Dear Mr. Thomsley: Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located within the boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD). Water service, therefore, would be available upon completion of financial arrangements between RCWD and the property owner. If fire protection is required, the customer will need to contact RCWD for fees and requirements. Water availability would be contingent upon the property owner signing an Agency Agreement that assigns water management rights, if any, to RCWD. If you have any questions, please contact an Engineering Services Representative at this office. Sincerely, RANCHO CAI JFORNIA WATER DISTRICT Steve Brannon, P.E. Development Engineering Manager g COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE · HEAEi, SERVICES AGENCY g DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH January 11, 2002 City of Temecuta Planning Department P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589 RE: Plot Plan No. PA01-0648 (The Fountains at Temecula Expansion) Dear Thomas K. Thornsley: 1. The Department of Environmental Health has reviewed the Plot Plan No. PA01-0648 and has no objections. Sanitary sewer and water services may be available in this area. 2. PRIOR TO ~ BUIJaDING PLAN CHlgCK APPROVAL for Environmental Health clearance, the following items are required: a) "Will-serve" letters from the appropriate water and sewering agencies. b) Three complete sets of plans for each food establishment (to include vending machines) and Swimming Pool/Spa facilities will be submitted, including a fixture schedule, a fmish schedule, and a plumbing schedule in order to ensure compliance with the California Uniform Retail Food Facilities Law and the California Swimming Pool Codes. For specific reference, please contact Food/Pool Facility Plan examiners at (909) 600-6330). c) A clearance letter from the Hazardous Services Materials Management Branch (909) 358-5055 will be required indicating that the project has been cleared for: · Underground storage tanks, Ordinance #617.4. · Hazardous Waste Generator Services, Ordinance #615.3. · Hazardous Waste Disclosure (in accordance with Ordinance #651.2. · Waste Reduction Management 3. Waste Regulation Branch (Waste Collection/Lea). Gregor Dellanbach, Environmental Health Specialist GD: gd (909) 955-8980 NOTE: Any current additional requirements not covered ca~ be applicable at time of Building Plan review for final Department of Environmental Health clearance. Local Enforcement Agency , RO. Box 1280. Riverside. CA 92502-1280 · {909) 955-8982 · FAX {909) 781-9653 · 4080 Lemon Street. 9th Floor, Riverside. CA 92501 Land Use and Water Engineering , RO. Box 1206, Riverside, CA 92502-1206 · (909) 955-8980 · FAX {909) 955-8903 · 4080 Lemon Streel, 2nd Floor, Riverside, CA 92501 DAVID P. ZAPPE General Manager-Chief Engineer RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT March 25, 2002 1995 MARKET STREET · RIVERSIDE, CA 92501 909.955.1200 909.788.9965 FAX 75906.1 Mr. Thomas Thomsley City of Temeeula 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 0 4 2002 Dear Mr. Thomsley: Re: PA 01- ~648 The District does not normally recommend conditions for land divisions or other land use cases in incorporated Cities. The District also does not plan check City land use cases, or provide State Division of Real Estate letters or other flood hazard reports for such cases. District comments/recommendations for such cases are normally limited to items of specific interest to the District including District Master Drainage Plan facilities, other regional flood control and drainage facilities which could be considered a logical component or extension ora master plan system, and District Area Drainage Plan fees (development mitigation fees). In addition, information of a general nature is provide& The District has not reviewed the proposed project in detail and the following comments do not in any way constitute or imply District approval or endorsement of the proposed project with respect to flood hazard, public health and safety, or any other such issue. PA 01-0648 is a proposal to design and conslruct a 102 unit senior apartment complex on 3.4 acres, located on the northeast comer of Winchester Road and Nicholas Road. This project is adjacent to Santa Gertrudis Channel. The applicant should ensure that the grading of the site would not create a levee condition in relationship to the channel. If a levee condition is created it would jeopardize the District's CLOIvlR-g91-09-48R for Santa Gertmdis Channel. Any work that involves the District's right of way, easements or facilities, will require an encroachment permit fi.om the District. The City should condition the applicant to provide all studies, calculations, plans or other information needed to meet FEMA requirements. This project is located within the limits of the District's Murrieta Creek/Santa Gertrudis Creek Area Drainage Plan for which drainage fees have been adopted. Applicable fees should be paid to the Flood Control District, at the time of issuance of building and grading permits. Questions regarding this matter may be directed to me at 909.955.1214. SKM:slj Very truly yours, STUART E. MCKIBBIN Senior Civil Engineer Exp. 3-31-02 RIVERSIDE January 9,2002 AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION RIVERSIDE COUNTY Please note address ~ m change @ 1/25/02 CHAIR Ed Adkison Riverside VICE CHAIRMAN William Cobb ComnaJRiverside COMMISSIONER~ Alien Graft Hemet Paul Gill Moreno Valley Patflck Williares San Jadnto Walt Snyder Palre Desert Barge Tandy CJi7 of Hemet STAFF Ke[th D. Do',,m s Executive Director : AJ,C,P., A.A.A.E 5555 Arlington Ave, Rivereide, CA 92504 Tel: (909) 9554990 CITY OF TEMECULA 43200 Business Park Dr./PO Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589 Attn: Thomas Thornsley Project Planner, Community Dev. Dept. RE: Pa 01-0648 Dear Mr. Thornsley: This case is within the Airport Influence Area of the French Valley Airport and subject to review until such time as the General Plan of the City is amended to conform to the Adopted Comprehensive Land Use Plan for the airport. After that time, only legislative items need to be sent to the ALUC. We utilize a form and procedures as prescribed in the Public Utilities Code 21670. I have attached a form for your convenience. The last time your agency sent this item for review, we discussed the case in the City offices; however, no referral was ever received in our office, nor was any EIR for this project ever sent to this agency. Upon receipt of a completed case, we will process this case at the next public meeting. I should also remind you that the Public Resources Code (CEQA) requires you to transmit any environmental document to California Aeronautics in Sacramento for any case within two nautical miles of an airport. Very truly yours, RIVERSIDE COUNTY AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION Executive Director KDD:pam CC: ALUC Staff B.T. Miller, Legal Counsel Rob Field, Aviation Manager F:~Share~EDCOM~,IRPORTgALUQCOT.LTP~010702,doc ALUC · 5555 Arlington Ave. · RIVERSIDE, CA 92504 ,, Tel: (909)351-0700 x2.04 ,, Fax: (909)688-6873 II. REFERRAL/APPLICATION: FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW LOCATION OF PROJECT: Referring Agency A. County of Riverside [] City of B. Project Reviewer Name (Planner) at local agency: D Other Tel #: Fax # Airport (Please check applicable box from listing below): Banning Municipal [] Bermuda Dunes [] Blythe [] Chino Airport [] Chiriaco Summit [] Corona Municipal [] Desert Center [] Desert Resorts Regional [] French Valley [] HemetJRyan [] March AFB [] Palm Springs [] Perils Valley [] Riverside Municipal[] Skylark [] Thermal [] APPLICANT INFORMATION: A. Representative: Mailing Address: Telephone No.: Owner: Fax#: III. Mailing Address: Telephone No.: PROJECT INFORMATION: A. Project Description: IV. 1. Thomas Bros. Map, Page & Coordinates: 2. Address of Project: (Building Permit Only). '3. Assessor Parcel Number: 4. Highest elevation above sea level (MSL) on project site: Project Type and Case No.: __Residential Commercial/Industrial Other Change of Zone # __Parcel Map # Plot Plan/Site Plan # Specific Plan # General Plan Amendment # Tract Map # __ Conditional Use Permit # Other: Type # # APPLICANT CERTIFICATION: I certify that the information provided is true and accurate as it relates to this proposal. Representative/Owner NOTICE: Failure of an applicant to submit complete or adequate information pursuant to Sections 65940 to 65948 inclusive, of the California Government Code, MAY constitute grounds for disapproval of actions, regulations, or permits. SUBMISSION PACKAGE: ALUC REVIEW STAFF REVIEW ...... Completed Application Form ...... Project Site Plan - Folded (8-1/2 x 14 max.) ...... Elevations of Buildings - Folded Each. 8 ¼ x 11 Acetate of the above ...... 8 ¼ x 11 Acetate showing project in relationship to airport. Sets.. Gummed address labels of the Owner and representative (see Item II, A & B). Set... Gummed address labels of all property owners within a radius of the project site, identical to the local approving jurisdiction (City or County). Sets.. Gummed address labels of the approving jurisdiction project reviewer (See I. B). ...... Check for Fee (See Item "C' below) 1 ..... Completed Application Form I ..... Project Site Plans - Folded (8-1/2 x 14max.) 1 ..... Elevations of Buildings - Folded 1 ..... 8 ~ x 11 Vicinity Map 1 Set. Gummed address labels of the Owner and representative. 1 Set. Gummed address labels of the approvidg jurisdiction project reviewer. 1 ..... Check for review - Staff Review ($98) Staff Review $98.00 (Minimum Deposit - $98.00) C. FEE SCHEDULE (Effective July 1, 1990): Approved by Resolution 90-01: ALUC REVIEW Change of Zone; Conditional Use Permit; General Plan Amendment; Parcel Map or PlotJSite Plan Review Initial Project Review $ 720.00 Amended Project Review $ 480.00 Specific Plan Review Initial Project Review Amended Project Review $1,765.00 $1,180.00 Tract Map Review Initial Project Review $ 820.00 Amended Project Review $ 550.00 Community Plan Review Initial Project Review Amended Project Review $2,000.00 $1,300.00 General Plan Element Review Initial Project Review Amended Project Review $2,000.00 $1,330.00 Environmental Impact Report Review Initial Project Review $1,650.00 Amended Project Review $1,100.00 Other Environmental Assessments Review Initial Project Review $ 905.00 Amended Project Review $ 600.00 Building Permit Review Initial Project Review $ 310.00 Amended Project Review $ 210.00 Please make out check payable to: Riverside County Airport Land Use Commission or A.L.U.C. F:~Shared~EDCOM~IRPORTS~ALUC~ALUC APP.d0c Rev. 3/25/02 ATTACHMENT NO. 2 EXHIBITS R:\D P~2001\01-0648 Fountains Expansion~Staff Report and COAs.doc 22 CITY OFTEMECULA CASE NO. - PA01-0648 EXHIBIT - A PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - JUNE 26, 2002 VICINITY MAP R:~D P~2001~01-0648 Fountains Expansion\Staff Report and COAs.doc CITY OF TEMECULA Site EXHIBIT B - GENERAL PLAN MAP DESIGNATION -(LI) LIGHT INDUSTRIAL EXHIBIT C - ZONING DESIGNATION - (LI) LIGHT INDUSTRIAL CASE NO. - PA01-0648 PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - JUNE 26, 2002 R:',,D P~2001",01-0648 Fountains Expansion\Staff Report and COAs.doc 24 CITY OF TEMECULA ~l~{pl~~ ii.ii ['.! , _o ...... ~. ~j~ , ~ ........ ...,~ ,., ! ~ i¢... , -!: .~ h!~l,, -.':i .... .,' ~-**~,J~" i~ II /.~.1 / /Z© Ilk ~~~ · ', ~ ~ I <;' ~Jl I~ *~fL--~_~/ ~l ~ -- ; III / OASE NO, - PA01-0648 EXHIBIT - D-1 SITE PLAN PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - JUNE 26, 2002 R:~D P~2001~01-0648 Fountains Expansion~Staff Repod and COAs.doc 25 CITY OF TEMECULA CASE NO. - PA0~-0848 EXHIBIT - D-2 SITE PLAN PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - JUNE 26, 2002 R:'~D P~001~01-0648 Fountains Expansion~Staff Report and COAs.doc CITY OF TEMECULA CASE NO. - PA01-0648 EXHIBIT - E-1 PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - JUNE 26, 2002 BUILDING ELEVATIONS R:~D P~.001~01-0648 Fountains Expansion\Staff Report and COAs,doc CITY OF TEMECULA CASE NO. - PA01-0648 EXHIBIT - E-2 BUILDING ELEVATIONS PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - JUNE 26, 2002 R:~D FA2001~01-0648 Fountains Expansion~Staff Report and COAs.doc 27 CITY OF TEMECULA CASE NO. - PA01-0648 EXHIBIT - E-3 PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - JUNE 26, 2002 BUILDING ELEVATIONS R:~D P~2001 ~01-0648 Fountains Expansion\Staff Report and COAs.doc CITY OF TEMECULA CASE NO. - PA01-0648 EXHIBIT - E-4 PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - JUNE 26, 2002 BUILDING ELEVATIONS R:~D P~001~01-0648 Fountains Expansion~Staff Report and COAs.doc ClTY OFTEMECULA CASE NO. - PA01-0648 EXHIBIT - F PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - JUNE 26, 2002 LANDSCAPE PLAN R:~O P~001~01-0648 Fountains Expansion~Staff Report and COAs.doc 3O ITEM #8 STAFF REPORT- PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION 3une 26,2002 Planning Application No. 02-0148 (Development Plan) Prepared By: Thomas Thornsley, Associate Planner RECOMMENDATION: The Community Development Department - Planning Division Staff recommends the Planning Commission: ADOPT a Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. 02-0148 (Development Plan) based on the Determination of Consistency with a project for which an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was previously certified pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 - Subsequent EIR's and Negative Declarations. 2. ADOPT a Resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2002-.__ A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 02- 0148 - A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCTION OF A SINGLE STORY OFFICE BUILDINGS TOTALING 7,986 SQUARE FEET ON .988 ACRES WITHIN THE OVERLAND CORPORATE CENTER, LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF OVERLAND DRIVE AND MARGARITA ROAD, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. 921-090-071. APPLICATION INFORMATION APPLICANT: Schafer Development Group, Inc., Robert Christoff, 27715 Jefferson Avenue, Temecula, CA 92590 PROPOSAL: A development plan for the design and construction of a single story office buildings totaling 7,986 square feet on a .988-acre lot. LOCATION: On the west side of Margarita Road just north of the northwest corner of Overland Drive and Margarita Road in the Overland Corporate Center within the Temecula Regional Center (APN 921-090-071 ). GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: PO (Professional Office) EXISTING ZONING: SP-7 (Specific Plan-7 Temecula Regional Center) R:'~D P~2002~02~0148 Shafer's Office\Staff report PC 6-26-02.doc 1 SURROUNDING ZONING: North: SP-7 (Specific Plan-7 Temecula Regional Center) South: BP (Business Park) East: LM (Medium Low Density Residential) and H (High Density Residential) West: SP-7 (Specific Plan-7 Temecula Regional Center) EXISTING LAND USE: Vacant SURROUNDING LAND USES: North: Vacant (Approved for retail center.) South: Vacant East: Single family detached homes and apartments. West: Promenade Mall PROJECT STATISTICS Total Gross Area: Total Net Area: Total Building Area: Paving: Hardscape: Landscape Area: Overland Corporate Center Parkin.q: 43,045 sc 29,085 sc 7,986 sc 12,147 s( 4,861 sc 7,853 s( uare feet .988 acres uare feet .667 acres uare feet 0.27 FAR uare feet 41.8% uare feet 16.7% uare feet 27.0% Parking Required: Net Office Parking Required: Restaurant Parking Required: Hotel Total Parking Required: Parking garage net gain Parking Provided: BACKGROUND 49,000 square feet/(1:250) 7,500 square feet/(1:100) 84 rooms/(1 :room + 2 manager) 196 spaces 75 spaces 86 spaces 357 spaces 7 spaces 365 spaces The applicant submitted a formal application to the Planning Department on March 26, 2002. A Development Review Committee meeting was not necessary due completeness of the plans submitted and a list of minor corrections was sent to the applicant on April 18, 2002. Upon resubmittal and final, review the project was deemed and set for hearing on June 10, 2002. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The applicant is proposing the design and development of their new business office, a 7,986 square foot office building on a .988-acre site within the 11.86-acres Overland Corporate Center. This lot is located in the north corner of the center. The proposed building will be single story with a subterranean parking and storage areas. The building is finished entirely with white metal panels and clear glass window to create a building with a very clean and crisp appearance. The wall planes of the building vary in and out and up and down defining the various element of the internal office space. From the street side, the building breaks into five vertical planes with the ends and middle being recessed and lower, while other two building elements are forward and taller towards the street. The second element from the left has an arched facade that is mostly windows, while its complementary element, on the right side is only 40% windows. Pillars are used to accent the corners of both these building elements. A large suspended metal framed canopy above the recessed glass front signifies the main entry to the offices. To the right of the entrance a Iow element of the building flows away from the bulk of the main building with a semi-circular facade. R:~D P~2002~02-0148 Shafer's Office\Staff report PC 6-26-02.doc 2 Placement of this building puts is in the north most corner of the Center nestled on a triangular shaped lot, flanked by Margarita Road, Long Canyon Creek, and the parking for the center. Since the rear of the building is adjacent to a landscape buffer, the applicant chose to use this as an outdoor plaza/patio that partially cantilevers over the slope leading down to the creek with an access walkway from the front of the building. Additionally, a smaller private, cantilevered patio is provided off the north end of the building. Access to the site is from the driveway on Margarita Road on the south side of the building. This access brings the vehicles into the parking areas for the Center. A small parking lot directly in front of the office offers 11 parking spaces in convenient proximity to the building and 11 additional (private) parking spaces provide below the building. Parking for the entire center was calculated and provided at a ratio, which accounted for this site being developed for office use. With common parking area and the underground parking this facility is more than adequately parked. Landscaping along the perimeter of the site (Margarita Road and Long Canyon Creek) is provided as part of the overall landscaping plan for the Center and this pad provide 27% landscaping exceeding the minimum required (15%) by the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan. A few modifications are proposed in these areas to blend and transition this landscaping to that used around the building. White Bimh trees are utilized to accent the building's architecture. A mix of shrubs is proposed from the building transitioning to ground cover and finally turf along the sidewalk adjacent to the street. Right at the base of the building, the applicant is proposing a four-foot wide gravel strip for maintenance and to act as a buffer and to give the building a more open appearance. ANALYSIS This project meets the standards of the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan and adds to the diversity intended for the Overland Corporate Center's mix of uses. The architecture of the office building is unique in its use of finish materials and style, creating a building that will be easily recognized in the community. The proposed building design is consistent with the amhitectural design of the Temecula Regional Center, the Development Code, and the architectural elements in the City-Wide Design Guidelines. By providing offsets along all elevations the mass and bulk of the building is broken up, which also meets the intent of the Community Design Element of the General Plan. This site layout more than adequately provides for the parking needs while access and internal circulation do not appear to create conflicts and appear to be safely designed. The proposed landscaping exceeds the minimum requirements of the Temecula Regional Center and complements the architectural design theme. The large landscape areas that are provided along Margarita Road and Long Canyon Creek ara planted with a wide range of varying trees, shrubs and ground cover that create visual interest from the public right of way and the neighboring Bel Villagio Center. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION This project is within the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan No. 263 for which an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared and certified. Under California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15162 (Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations)' this project is exempt and a Notice of Exemption has been prepared for Planning Application No. 00- 0213. Section 15162 applies when an EIR has been certified or negative declaration adopted for a project, no subsequent EIR shall be prepared for that project unless there are substantial changes not discussed or examined in the Ell:{. The affected area of the site development meets the criteria noted by developing consistent with the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan No. 263 land uses which anticipated retail, restaurant, R:'~D P~2002~02-0148 Shafer's Office\Staff report PC 6-26-02.doc 3 office, and hotel uses. Therefore, the proposed project is eligible for a CEQA exemption pursuant to Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines. GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING CONSISTENCY The project is consistent with the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan 263, Professional Office (PO) land use designations of the Temecula General Plan and the Development Code. Upon approval of the Development Plan as conditioned, the project will meet all of the guidelines and standards for office development prescribed by the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan No. 263, Development Code, and Design Guidelines. SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS The project has been determined by staff to be consistent with applicable City policies, standards and guidelines. We believe it is compatible with the nature and quality of surrounding development, and will represent an attractive, functional and economic addition to the City's commercial and employment base. FINDINGS - DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the city. The proposal is consistent with the land use designation and policies reflected for Community Commercial (CC) development in the City of Temecula General Plan, as well as the development standards for the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan (SP-7) and the City of Temecula Development Code. The site is therefore properly planned and zoned and found to be physically suitable for a restaurant use. 2. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The architecture proposed for the office is consistent with the Architectural requirements as stated in the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan (SP-7) and Design Guidelines and the Commercial Performance Standards of the Development Code. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, can be found to be consistent with, all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety and welfare. Attachments: PC Resolution - Blue Page 5 Exhibit A. Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 8 Exhibits - Blue Page 21 A. Vicinity Map B. Zoning Map C. General Plan D. Site Plan E. Elevation - Single Story F. Elevation - Two Story G. Landscape Plan R:~D P~2002~02-0148 Shafer's Office~Staff report PC 6-26-02.doc 4 A'I-I'ACHMENT NO. 1 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2001-.__ R:~D P~002',02-0148 Shafefs Office~Staff report PC 6-26-02.doc 5 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 02- 0148 - A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE DESIGN, AND CONSTRUCTION OF A SINGLE STORY OFFICE BUILDINGS TOTALING 7,986 SQUARE FEET ON .988 ACRES WITHIN THE OVERLAND CORPORATE CENTER, LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF OVERLAND DRIVE AND MARGARITA ROAD, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. 921-090-071. WHEREAS, schafer Development Group, Inc., filed Planning Application No. 02-0148, in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code; WHEREAS, Planning Application No. 02-0148 was processed including, but not limited to public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. 02-0148 on June 26, 2002, at duly noticed public hearings as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission approved Planning Application No. 02-0148; NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by reference. Section 2. Findinqs. The Planning Commission, in approving Planning Application No. 02-0148 hereby makes the following findings as required by Section 17.05.010.F of the Temecula Municipal Code: A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the city. The proposal is consistent with the land use designation and policies reflected for Community Commercial (CC) development in the City of Temecula General Plan, as well as the development standards for the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan (SP-7) and the City of Temecula Development Code. The site is therefore properly planned and zoned and found to be physically suitable for a restaurant use. B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The architecture proposed for the office is consistent with the Architectural requirements as stated in the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan (SP-7) and Design Guidelines and the Commercial Pedormance Standards of the Development Code. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, can be found to be consistent with, all applicable policies, guidelines, standards R:~D p~2002~02-0148 Shafer's Office\Staff report PC 6-26-02.doc 6 and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety and we/fare. The overall design of the project, including the site, building, parking, circulation and other associated site improvements, is consistent with and intended to protect the health and safety of those working in and around the site. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned has been found to be consistent with, all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety and welfare. Section 3. Environmental Compliance. A Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. 02-0148 was made per the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15162. This section applies when an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) has been certified or negative declaration adopted for a project, no subsequent EIR shall be prepared for that project unless there are substantial changes not discussed or examined in the EIR. Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby conditionally approves Planning Application No. 02-0148, a Development Plan to design, and construct a single story office buildings totaling 7,986 square feet on a .988 acre lot on the northwest corner of Overland Drive and Margarita Road, and known as Assessor Parcel No. 921-090-071. The Conditions of Approval are contained in Exhibit A. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 26th day of June 2002. Dennis Chiniaeff, Chairperson ATTEST: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary {SEAL} STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF TEMECULA ) ) ss ) I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that PC Resolution No. 02- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 26th day of June 2002, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: pLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: pLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: pLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary R:'~D p~2002~2-0148 Shafer's Office'~Staff report PC 6-26-02.doc 7 EXHIBIT A CONDITIONS OFAPPROVAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN R:~D P~2002',02-0148 Shafer's Office\Staff report PC 6-26-02.doc 8 EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No. 02-0148 (Development Plan) Project Description: The design, end construction of a single story office buildings totaling 7,986 square feet on a .988 acre lot on the west side of Margarita Road just north of the northwest corner of Overland Drive and Margarita Road. DIF Category: $2.00 per square foot (pursuant to the Development Agreement for the Promenade Mall Project PA96-0333) Assessor Parcel No.: Approval Date: Expiration Date: 921-090-071 June 26,2002 June 26,2004 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project 1. The applicant shall deliver to the Community Development Department- Planning Division a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty- four Dollars ($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21108(b) and California Code of Regulations Section 15062. if within said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant has not delivered to the Community Development Department - Planning Division the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c). General Requirements 2. The permittee/applicant shall indemnify, protect and hold harmless, the City and any agency or instrumentality thereof, and/or any of its officers, employees, and agents from any and all claims, actions, or proceedings against the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its officers, employees, and agents, to attack, set aside, void, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting from an approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application which action is brought within the appropriate statute of limitations period and Public Resources Code, Division 13, Chapter 4 (Section 21000 et seq., including but not by the way of limitations Section 21152 and 21167). The City shall promptly notify the permittee/applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding brought forth within this time period. The City shall estimate the cost of the defense of the action and applicant shall deposit said amount with the City. City may require additional deposits to cover anticipated costs. City shall refund, without interest, any unused portions of the deposit once the litigation is finally concluded. Should the City fail to either promptly notify or cooperate fully, permittee/applicant shall not, thereafter be responsible to indemnify, defend, protect, or hold harmless the City, any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its R:~D P~002~02-0148 Shafe~'s Office~Staff report PC 6-26-02.doc 9 o = officers, employees, or agents. Should the applicant fail to timely post the required deposit, the Director may terminate the land use approval without further notice to the applicant. This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. The applicant shall comply with all mitigation measures contained in the approved Mitigation Monitoring Program for the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan. The applicant shall comply with the Conditions of Approval for Planning Application No. 97- 0118 (Promenade Mall) and the Conditions of Approval for PA00-0397 (Overland Corporate Center) unless superceded by these Conditions of Approval. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibit "D" (Site Plan), contained on file with the Community Development Department - Planning Division. Additionally, the following criteria must be met prior to development of the project: a. The three tree planter as depicted on the landscape plan shall be installed. b. The design of the "decorative pave concrete" shall be subject to reviewed and approved by Planning prior issuance of building permit c. All ground mounted utility/mechanical equipment shall not be placed in prominent locations visible to the public. This equipment shall be screened from view. d. Per the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan and the Design Guidelines, the double detector check assembly must be installed underground. e. Provide the Planning Department with a copy of the underground water plans and electrical plans for verification of proper placement of the transf.ormer and the double detector check prior to final agreement with the utility companies. Parking lot lights shall be of a type consistent with the standards used throughout the Mall, which have been a dark bronze, round tapered pole with a mounded height of twenty to thirty-five (20-35) feet. The site lighting plan shall be approved by the Planning Department prior to installation. Any outside wall-mounted lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way. Details of these lights shall be submitted to the Planning Department during plan check for review pdor to installation. The installation of wall pack style light shall not be used along the street side elevation. Building elevations shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibits "E and F' (Building Elevations), contained on file with the Community Development Department - Planning Division as amended by these changes: a. All mechanical and roof-mounted equipment shall be hidden by building elements that were designed for that purpose as an integral part of the building. When determined to be necessary by the Director of Planning, the parapet will be raised to provide for this screening. R:~D p~2002~02-0148 Shafer's Office~taff report PC 6-26-02,doc 10 10. 11. 12. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable satisfaction of the Director of Planning. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the Director of Planning shall have the authorityto require the property owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan, The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any successors in interest. The Landscaping Plan shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibit "F' (Landscape Plan) and as amended by the following: a. The landscaping along Margarita Road shall be modified to eliminate the conflict with the entry landscape element. b. A concrete mow curb shall be installed between turf and shrub areas. c. Modifications recommended by the City's landscape architect for consistency with the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan shall be completed prior to construction landscape plan approval. d. Addition shrubs shall be added along the creek bank to better aid in screening and create a better barrier between the creek trail and the ramp to the underground parking. The colors and materials for this project shall substantially conform to the following list of approved colors and materials and with the Color and Material Board contained on file with the Community Development Department - Planning Division. Any deviation from the approved colors and materials shall require approval of the Director of Planning. Finish & Color Material White window mullions with clear glazing Windows, doors Metal panels - white Wall face Wall columns Sawyer's Fence Frazee # 8231W (light tan) over dashed stucco finish Prior to the Issuance of Grading Permits 13. The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be provided by the Community Development Department - Planning Division staff, and return one signed set to the Community Development Department - Planning Division for their files. 14. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that Ordinance or by providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid. 15. If necessary the applicant shall revise Exhibits "D, E, F and G", (Site Plan, Elevations, Landscape Plan, Color and Material Board) to reflect the final Conditions of Approval and submit five (5) full size copies. 16, The applicant shall submit to the Community Development Department - Planning Division for permanent filing two (2) 8" X 10" glossy photographic color prints of the approved Color and Materials Board and of the colored version of approved Exhibit "E', the colored architectural elevations to the Community Development Department - Planning Division for their files. All labels on the Color and Materials Board and Elevations shall be readable on the photographic prints. R:~D P~002',02-0148 Shafer's Office~Staff report PC 6-26-02,doc 11 Prior to 17. 18. the Issuance of Building Permits A Consistency Check fee shall be paid per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule. Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and irrigation Plans shall be submitted to the Community Development Department - Planning Division for approval. These plans shall conform substantially with the approved Exhibit "F", or as amended by these conditions. The location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The cover page shall identify the total square footage of the landscaped area for the site. The plans shall be accompanied by the following items: a. Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal). b. One (1) copy of the approved grading plan. c. Water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water Efficient Ordinance). d. Total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with the approved plan). e. A landscape maintenance program shall be submitted for approval, which details the proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials to assure proper growth and landscape development for the long term esthetics of the property. The approved maintenance program shall be provided to the landscape maintenance contractor who shall be responsible to carry out the detailed program. Prior to the Issuance of Occupancy Permits 19. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Director of Planning. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working order. 20. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Planning, to guarantee the maintenance of the plantings, in accordance with the approved construction landscape and irrigation plan shall be filed with the Community Development Department - Planning Division for one year from final certificate of occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping and irrigation system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Director of Planning, the bond shall be released upon request by the applicant. 21. Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently affixed roflectofized sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square inches in area and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space at a minimum height of 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space finished grade, or centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space finished grade, ground, or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each entrance to the off- street parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches, clearly and conspicuously stating the following: "Unauthorized vehicles parked in designated accessible spaces not displaying distinguishing placards or license plates issued for R:~D p',2002\02-0148 Shafer's Office\Staff report PC 6-26-02,doc 22. persons with disabilities may be towed away st owner's expense. Towed vehicles may be reclaimed by telephoning 909 696-3000." In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall have a surface identification sign duplicating the Symbol of Accessibility in blue paint of at least 3 square feet in size. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 23. Unless otherwise noted, all conditions shall be completed by the Developer at no cost to any Government Agency. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the site plan all existing and proposed property lines, easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and revision. General Requirements 24. A Grading Permit for either rough and/or precise grading, including all on-site flat work and improvements, shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained street right-of-way. 25. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way. 26. All improvement plans and grading plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars. Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit 27. A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include all necessary erosion control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and private property. 28. The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works. 29. A Soil Report shall be prepared by a registered Soil or Civil Engineer and submitted to the Director of the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and pavement sections. 30. A Geological Report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address special study zones and the geological conditions of the site, and shall provide recommendations to mitigate the impact of ground shaking and liquefaction. R:~D p~2002\02-0148 Shafer's Office\Staff report PC 6-26-02.doc 13 31. The Developer shall have a Drainage Study prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in accordance with City Standards identifying storm water runoff expected from this site and upstream of this site. The study shall identify all existing or proposed public or private drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. The study shall also analyze and identify impacts to downstream properties and provide specific recommendations to protect the properties and mitigate any impacts. Any upgrading or upsizing of downstream facilities, including acquisition of drainage or access easements necessary to make required improvements, shall be provided by the Developer. 32. The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or the project is shown to be exempt. 33. As deemed necessary by the Director of the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: a. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District b. Planning Department c. Department of Public Works d, Building and Safety Department e. City of Temecula Fire Prevention Bureau 34. The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject property. 35. Permanent landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department and the Department of Public Works for review and approval. 36, The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or slope easements for off-site work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public Works. 37. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by either cashier's check or money order, prior to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area drainage plan fee. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid. Prior to Issuance of a Building Permit 38. Improvement plans and/or precise grading plans shall conform to applicable City of Temecula Standards subject to approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works. The following design criteria shall be observed: a. Flow line grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over A.C. paving. b. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula Standard No. 207A. c. Streetlights shall be installed along the public streets adjoining the site in accordance with City Standard No. 800,801,802 and 803, R:'~D p',2.002~02-0148 Shafer's Office~taff reporl PC 6-26-02,doc 14 39. 40. 41, 42. d. All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees. e. All concentrated drainage directed towards the public street shall be conveyed through under sidewalk drains. The Developer shall construct the following public improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works. a. Street improvements, which may include, but not limited to: pavement, curb and gutter, medians, sidewalks, drive approaches, street lights, signing, striping, traffic signal systems, and other traffic control devices as appropriate b. Storm drain facilities c. Sewer and domestic water systems d. Under grounding of proposed utility distribution lines The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance with the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered Civil Engineer, and the Soil Engineer shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions. The Developer shall obtain/grant an easement for ingress and egress over the adjacent property. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06. Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy 43. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: a. Rancho California Water District b. Eastern Municipal Water District c. Department of Public Works 44. All public improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and City standards to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works. 45. The existing improvements shall be reviewed, Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works. BUILDING & SAFETY DEPARTMENT 46. Ali design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 1998 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 1998 National Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy and Disabled Access Regulations and the Temecula Municipal Code. R:~D p~2002~02-0148 Shafer's Office~Staff report PC 6-26-02.doc 15 47. 48, 49. 50. 51. 52. 53. 54. 55. 56. 57. 58. 59. 60. 61. 62. 63, Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plans showing compliance with Ordinance No, 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All street lights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted to the Building & Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School Mitigation Fees. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review. Disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building is required. The path of travel shall meet the California Disabled Access Regulations in terms of cross slope, travel slope stripping and signage. Provide all details on plans. (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1, 1998) All building and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations. Provide all details on plans. (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1, 1998) Provide van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entry. Provide house electrical meter provisions for power for the operation of exterior lighting, fire alarm systems. Restroom fixtures, number and type, to be in accordance with the previsions of the 1998 edition of the California Building Code Appendix 29. Provide an approved automatic fire sprinkler' system. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans pdor to permit issuance. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic and mechanical plan for plan review. Truss calculations that are stamped by the engineer of record and the truss manufacturer engineer are required for plan review submittal. Provide precise grading plan for plan check submittal to check for handicap accessibility. A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the building construction. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standard and any block walls if not on the approved building plans, will require separate approvals and permits. Show all building setbacks. R:~D P~2002~02-0148 Shafer's Office\Staff report PC 6-26-02.doc 16 64. Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrance to the project that indicates the hours of construction, shown below, as allowed by the City of Temecula Ordinance No. 0-90-04, specifically Section G (1) of Riverside County Ordinance No. 457.73, for any site within one- quarter mile of an occupied residence. Monday-Friday: 6:30 a.m. - 6:30 p.m. Saturday: 7:00 a.m. - 6:30 p.m. No work is permitted on Sunday or Government Holidays FIRE DEPARTMENT 65. The following are the Fire Department Conditions of Approval for this project. All questions regarding the meaning of these conditions shall be referred to the Fire Prevention Bureau. 66. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in force at the time of building plan submittal. 67. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a m;nimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all commercial buildings per CFC Appendix III.A, Table A-III-A-1. The developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 1500 GPM at 20 PSI residual operating pressure, plus an assumed sprinkler demand of 400 GPM for a total fire flow of 1900 GPM with a 2 hour duration. The required fire flow may be adjusted during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire Flow as given above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC 903.2, Appendix Ill-A) 68. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC Appendix Ill-B, Table A-III-B-1. A minimum of I hydrants, in a combination of on-site and off- site (6" x 4" x 2-2 1/2" outlets) shall be located on Fire Department access roads and adjacent public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 500 feet apart, at each intersection and shall be located no more than 250 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required. (CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix Ill-B) 69. As required by the California Fire Code, when any portion of the facility is in excess of 150 feet from a water supply on a public street, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the facility, on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided. For this project on site fire hydrants are required. (CFC 903.2) 70. Maximum cul-de-sac length shall not exceed 1320 feet. Minimum turning radius on any cul- de-sac shall be forty-five (45) feet. (CFC 902.2.2.2.3 and Subdivision Ord 16.03.020) 71. If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection prior to any building construction. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2) 72. Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent roads are installed. Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface for 80,000 lbs. GVW. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2) R:~D p~002~02~0148 Shafer~s Office\Staff report PC 6-26-02.doc 17 73. Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved Fire Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or any portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface designed for 80,000 lbs. GVVV with a minimum AC thickness of .25 feet. (CFC sec 902) The applicant may at their option submit in writing a proposal for some alternative to mitigate a lack of required access. This proposal must be accepted by the Fire Department prior to construction. 74. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13) feet six (6) inches. (CFC 902.2.2.1) 75. The gradient for fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed fifteen (15) percent. (CFC 902.2.2.6 Ord. 99-14) 76. Prior to building construction, dead end roadways and streets in excess of one hundred and fifty (150) feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of accommodating fire apparatus. (CFC 902.2.2.4) 77. Prior to building construction, this development shall have two (2) points of access, via all- weather surface roads, as approved bythe Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 902.2.1) 78. Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature block; and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. After the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be presented to the Fire Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system including fire hydrants shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building materials being placed on an individual lot. (CFC 8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and National Fire Protection Association 24 1-4.1) 79. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective Markers" shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations. (CFC 901.4.3) 80. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, approved numbers or addresses shall be provided on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Numbers shall be of a contrasting color to their background. Commercial, multi-family residential and industrial buildings shall have a minimum twelve (12) inches numbers with suite numbers a minimum of six (6) inches in size. All suites shall gave a minimum of six (6) inch high letters and/or numbers on both the front and rear doors. Single-family residences and multi-family residential units shall have four (4) inch letters and/or numbers, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 901.4;4) 81. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a directory display monument sign shall be required for apartment, condominium, townhouse or mobile home parks. Each complex shall have an illuminated diagrammatic layout of the complex which indicates the name of the complex, all streets, building identification, unit numbers, and fire hydrant locations within the complex. Location of the sign and design specifications shall be submitted to and be approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau prior to installation. R:~D P~2002~D2-0148 Shafe~'s Office~Staff report PC 6-26-02.doc 18 82. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on square footage and type of construction, occupancy or use, the developer shall install a fire sprinkler system. Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. (CFC Article 10, CBC Chapter 9) 83. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on a requirement for monitoring the sprinkler system, occupancy or use, the developer shall install an fire alarm system monitored by an approved Underwriters Laboratory listed central station. Plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bui'eau for approval prior to installation. (CFC Article 10) 84. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a "Knox-Box" shall be provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six (6) feet in height and be located to the right side of the main entrance door. (CFC 902.4) 85. All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry system for emergency access by fire fighting personnel. (CFC 902.4) 86. Prior to final inspection of any building, the applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire Department for approval, a site plan designating Fire Lanes with appropriate lane painting and or signs. 87. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, the developer/applicant shall be responsible for obtaining underground and/or aboveground tank permits for the storage of combustible liquids, flammable liquids or any other hazardous materials from both the County Health department and Fire Prevention Bureau.(CFC 7901.3 and 8001.3) Special Conditions 88. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final a simple plot plan and a simple floor plan, each as an electronic file of the .DWG format must be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau. Alternative file formats may be acceptable, contact fire prevention for approval. 89. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Fire Code permit process and update any changes in the items and quantities approved as part of their Fire Code permit. These changes shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for review and approval per the Fire Code and is subject to inspection. (CFC 105) 90. The applicant shall submit for review and approval by the Riverside County Department of Environmental Health and City Fire Department an update to the Hazardous Material Inventory Statement and Fire Department Technical Report on file at the city; should any quantities used or stored onsite increase or should changes to operation introduce any additional hazardous material not listed in existing reports. (CFC Appendix II-E) OTHER AGENCIES 91. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth by the City of Temecula Police Department Crime prevention in a transmittal dated April 9, 2002, a copy of which is attached. R:~) P~002~2-0148 Shafer's Office\Staff report PC 6-26-02.doc 19 92. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Rancho California Water District's transmittal dated April 10, 2002, a copy of which is attached. 93. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Riverside County Department of Environmental Health transmittal dated April 19, 2002, a copy of which is attached. 94. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District transmittal dated May 16, 2002, a copy of which is attached. By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be subject to Planning Commission approval. Applicant's Signature Name printed Date R:~D P~2.002~02-0148 Sh~fer's Office\Staff report PC 6-26-02.doc 20 CITY OF TEMECULA POLICE DEPARTMENT CRIME PREVENTION & PLANS UNIT 27540 Ynez Road, Suite J-9, Temecula, CA 92591 (909) 506-2626 Fax: (909) §06-2838 Date: April 9, 2002 Subject: Development Plan to construct a 8,000 square foot Professional Building Shafer Office Building Permit Number: PA02-0148 Case Planner; Thomas Thornsley The following comments pertains to Officer Safety, Public Safety and Crime Prevention measures regarding this planning application request. 1. LANDSCAPING: Applicant shall ensure all landscaping surrounding the building are kept at a height of no more than three feet (3') or below the ground floor windowsills. Plants, hedges and shrubbery should be defensible plants to deter would-be intruders from breaking into the building utilizing lower level windows. (a) Applicant should ensure all trees surrounding both building roof tops be kept at a distance so as to deter roof accessibility by "would-be burglars." Trees also act as a natural ladder. Prune tree branches with at least a 6 feet clearance from building. (b) All burms should not exceed 3' in height. (c) The placement of all landscaping should follow the guidelines from Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED). 2. LIGHTING: All exterior lighting surrounding the building should be energy-saving and minimized after closing hours of business to comply with the State of California Lighting Ordinance, Furthermore, all exterior lighting must comply with Mt. Palomar Lighting Requirements. (a) All exterior doors should have their own vandal resistant fixtures installed above. The doors shall be illuminated with a minimum one (1) foot candle of light at ground level, evenly dispersed. 3. HARDWARE: All doors, windows, locking mechanisms, hinges, and other miscellaneous hardware shall be commercial or institution grade. (a) ROOF NUMBERING: The construction plans shall indicate the application of painted rooftop addressing plotted on a 9-inch grid pattern with 45-inch tall numerals spaced 9-inch apart. The numerals shall be painted With a standard 9-inch paint · roller using fluorescent yellow paint applied over a contrasting background. The address shall be oriented to the street and place as closely as possible to the edge of the building closest to the street. 4. GRAFFITI: Any graffiti painted or marked upon the building shall be removed or painted over within twenty-four (24) hours of being dis~,overed. Notify the Temecula Police Department immediately so a report can be taken. 5.ALARM SYSTEM: Upon completion of construction, the building shall have a monitored alarm system installed and monitored 24-hours a day by a designated private alarm company, to notify the police department immediately of any intrusion. If building will be sub-divided into smaller businesses, each private business sector should have their own alarm system. 6.ROOF HATCHES: All roof hatches shall be painted "international Orange." 7.PUBLIC TELEPHONES: Any public telephones located on the exterior of the building should be placed in a well-lighted, highly visible area, and installed with a "call-out only" feature to deter loitering. This feature is not required for telephones installed within the interior of the building. 8.CRIME PREVENTION: (a) All retailing businesses shall contact the California Retailers Association for their booklet on the California Retail Theft Law at: California Retailers Association 1127- 11th Street, Suite 1030, Sacramento, CA 95814 (916) 443-1975. Penal Code 490.5 affords merchants the opportunity to recover their losses through a civil demand program. (b) Retailers desiring a business security survey of their location can contact the crime prevention unit of the Temecula Police Department. © Employee training regarding retail theft, credit card prevention, citizen's arrest procedures, personal safety or any other related crime prevention training procedures are also available through the crime prevention unit. (d) The Temecula Police Department affords all retailers the opportunity to participate in the "lnkless Ink Program." At a minimal cost of less than $40.00 for inkless inkpads, retailers can take a thumbprint of every customer using a personal check to pay for services. A decal is also posted on the front entry of the business-advising customers of the "lnkless Ink program in use". If the business becomes a victim of check fraud, the police department will be able to track the suspect with the thumbprint. Any questions regarding these comments shall be referred to the Temecula Police Department Crime Prevention and Plans Officer at (909) 506-2626. April 10, 2002 Thomas Thomsley, Case Planner City of Temecula Planning Department 43200 Business Park Drive Post Office Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 SUBJECT: WATER AVAILABILITY A PORTION OF LOT NO. 5 OF TRACT NO. 3334 A PORTION OF APN 921-090-094 PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA02~0148 Dear Mr. Thornsley: Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located within the boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD). Water service, therefore, would be available upon completion of financial arrangements between RCWD and the property owner. If fire protection is required, the customer will need to contact RCWD for fees and requirements. Water availability would be contingent upon the property owner signing an Agency Agreement that assigns water management rights, if any, to RCWD. If you should have any questions, please contact an Engineering Services Representative at this office. Sincerely, RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT Steve Brannon, P.E. Development Engineering Manager 02~SB:at058~F012-T6~FCF lq COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE · HEALTH SERVICES AGENCY lq DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH April t9, 2002 City of Temecula Planning Department P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589 RE: Plot Plan No. PA02-0148 Dear Thomas Thomsley: 1. The Department of Environmental Health has reviewed the Plot Plan No. PA02-0148 and has no objections. Sanitary sewer and water services are available in this area. 2. PRIOR TO ANY BUILDING PLAN CI:tECK APPROVAL for Environmental Health clearance, the following items are required: a) "Will-serve" letters from the appropriate water and sewering agencies. Sincerely, ~ental Health Specialist (909) 955-8980 NOTE: Any current additional requirements not covered can be applicable at time of Building Plan review for final Department of Environmental Health clearance. Local Enforcement Agency · RO. Box 1280, Riverside, CA 92502-1280 · (909) 955-8982 · FAX (909) 781-9653 · 4080 Lemon Street, 9th Floor, Riverside, CA 92501 Land Use and Water Engineering · FO. Box 1206, Riverside, CA 92502-1206 · (909) 950-8980 · FAX {909} 955-8903 · 4080 Lemon Street, 2nd Floor, Riverside, CA 92501 DAVID P. ZAPPE General Manager-Chief Engineer ./~,~ MAY 0 200 City of Temecula Planning Department Post Office Box 9033 Temecula, California 92589-9033 Ladies and Gentlemen: 1995 MARKET STREE' RIVERSIDE, CA 92501 909/955-1200 909/788-9965 FAX 5t180.1 RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT The District does not normally recommend conditions for land divisions or other land use cases in incorporated cities. The District also does not plan check city land use cases, or provide State Division of Real Estate letters or other flood hazard reports for such cases. Dis~ct comments/recommendations for such cases are normally limited to item. s of specific ~.nte.r. est to the Distdct including District Master Drainage Plan facilities, other regional flood contro~ and draina,,qe mcifities which could be considered a logical componantor extension of a master plan system, and District Area urainage Plan fees (development mitigation fees). In addition, information of a general nature is provided. The District has n. ot_r.eviewed the proposed.project in detail and the following checked comments do not in any way ,con,s.,titute.or [m. ply uistrict., approv, a! or enaorsement of the proposed projC~t with respect to flood hazard, public nealm ano safety or any omar sucn issue: t,,,~ This project would not be impacted by District Master Drainage Plan facilities nor are other facilities of regional Interest proposed. This project involves District Master Plan facilities. The District will accept ownership of such facilities on written request of the City. Facilities must be constructed to District standards, and District plan check and insp.ecti,on will be required for District acceptance. Plan check, inspection and administrative fees will be requlrea. This p.roje~, propos.es channels storm drains 36 inches or larger in diameter or other facilities that could be cons~aema regional in nature and/or a logical extension of the adopted · Master Drainage Plan. The District woulc~ consider accepting ownership ot such fac~liUes on wntten request .of the City. Facilities must be constructed to District standards, and District plan check and inspection will oe required for District acceptance. Plan check, inspection and administrative fees will be required. , V/' This project is located within the limits of the District's J~iJR. P,I~TR ~.EEK/'"/'EI~I~..C.d~,RVR~rr~ay Drainage Plan for .which .drainage fees have been ad.opted; applicable lees shq01d be paid,Dy cashier's c~, .e.~, or money o.roer only to the Flood Control Distdct pdor m issuance of building or graoingpermits~ whichever comes nrst. Fees to be paid should be at the rate in effect at the time of issuance of[he actua~ permit. GENERAL INFORMATION This project may require a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Con[roi Board. Clearance for grading, recordation, or other final approval should not be given until [he City has determined that the project has been granted a permit or is shown to be exempt. If [his pr.o. ject involves a Federal Emergen~Ty Management Agency (FE.MA) mapped flood plain [hen [he City should require me applicant to provide all studies, calculations plans and omar reformation r_e_q_ uired to meet FEMA requirements and should further require that the applicant obtain a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) prior to grad ng, recordation or other fina approval of the project, and a Letter of Map Rev s on (LOMR) prior to occupancy. If a natural watercourse or mapped flood plain is impacted by this project, the. City should req.uire the applicant to obtain a Section 1601/1603 Agreement from the California Department of Fish and Ga. me an.a a Clean water Act .Se..ctJo. n 4_04 Permit. from [he..U.S...Army Corps of .Engi.ne..e. rs, o.r .writte. n.c..orr.e, spop~a.e.n, ce. rro..m t..h.e~ a.g_enc.!es malcating me project is exempt tram mesa requlremems. ^ ~;lean water Ac~ ~ecuon ,~u] water ~ua,ty ~,er[mcatlon may be required -from the local California Regional Water Quality Control Board prior to issuance of the Corps 404 permit. Very truly yours, STUART E. MCKIBBIN Senior Civil Engineer Date: ~ ATTACHMENT NO. 2 EXHIBITS R:~D p~2002~02-0148 Shafer's Office\Staff report PC 6-26-02,doc 21 CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 02-0148 (Development Plan) EXHIBIT A PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - June 26, 2002 VICINITY MAP R:~D P~2002~02-0148 Shafer's Office\Staff report PC 6-26-02.doc CITY OF TEMECULA EXHIBIT B DESIGNATION - SP-6 (Campos Verdes Specific Plan) ZONING MAP EXHIBIT C DESIGNATION -OP (Office Professional) PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 02-0148 (Development Plan) PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - June 26, 2002 GENERAL PLAN R:~D P~2002~02-0148 Shafer's Office\Staff report PC 6-26-02.doc ClTY OFTEMECULA I I I PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 02-0148 (Development Plan) EXHIBIT D PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - June 26, 2002 SITE PLAN R:~D P~2002~D2-0148 Shafer's Office~Stafl report PC 6-26-02.doc CITY OF TEMECULA Il II ! PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 02-0148 (Development Plan) EXHIBIT E-1 PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - June 26, 2002 ELEVATION R:~D P~?.002~02-0148 Shafer's Office~Staff report PC 6-26-02,doc CiTY OF TEMECULA WEST ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 02-0148 (Development Plan) EXHIBIT E-2 PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - June 26, 2002 R:~D P',2002~02-0148 Shafer's Office~Staff report PC 6~26-02.d0c ELEVATION CITY OFTEMECULA PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 02-0148 (Development Plan) EXHIBIT F PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - June 26, 2002 LANDSCAPEPLAN R:~D P~2002~02-0148 Shafefs Office~Stafl report PC 6-26-02.doc CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 02-0148 (Development Plan) EXHIBIT G PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - June 26, 2002 R:~D P~2002~02-0148 Shafer's Office\Staff report PC 6-26-02.doc ITEM #9 STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION June 26, 2002 Planning Application No. 02-0t 20 (Development Plan) Prepared By: Rolfe Preisendanz, Assistant Planner RECOMMENDATION: The Community Development Department - Planning Division Staff recommends the Planning Commission: ,ADOPT a Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. 02-0120 (Development Plan) based on the Determination of Consistency with a project for which an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was previously certified pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 - Subsequent EIR's and Negative Declarations. 2. ADOPT a Resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 02- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 02- 0120 - A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION AND ESTABLISHMENT OF TWO MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDINGS ON 1.5 ACRES WITH BUILDING "A" HAVING 3,800 SQUARE FEET AND BUILDING "B" HAVING 11,'100 SQUARE FEET, TOTALING 14,600 SQUARE FEET, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF MARGARITA ROAD AND NORTH GENERAL KEARNY ROAD, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. APN 921-810-008. APPLICATION INFORMATION APPLICANT: Edward Anderson Medical Real Estate Development Company P.O.Box 890292 Temecula CA 92589-0292 OWNER: Promenade Medical Condo Development LLC P.O.Box 890292 Temecula CA 92589 PROPOSAL: A Development Plan to construct, operate and establish two medical office buildings with a total area of 14,600 square foot located on the southeast corner of Margarita Road and North General Kearny Road (APN 921-810-008). R:~D P~2002~02-0120 Margarita Medical Phase 2~Staff report.doc 1 LOCATION: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: EXISTING ZONING: SURROUNDING ZONING: EXISTING LAND USE: SURROUNDING LAND USES: PROJECT STATISTICS Lot area (gross): Lot area (net): Landscaped area: Parking required: Parking provided: Lot coverage: Floor area ratio: Building A Area Calculations: Total Building Area Footprint Building height: Building B Area Calculations: Total Building Area Footprint Building height: On the southeast corner of Margarita Road and North General Kearny Road (APN 921-810-008) PO (Professional Office) SP-6 (Specific Plan-6 Campos Verdes) North: SP-8 (Specific Plan-6 Campos Verdes) South: SP-6 (Specific Plan-6 Campos Verdes) East: SP-6 (Specific Plan-6 Campos Verdes) West: SP-6 (Specific Plan-7 Temecula Regional Center) Vacant North: Medical Office buildings South: Flood Control Basin East: Vacant (Approved for a Chumh) West: Promenade Mall 69,228 square feet (1.58 acres) 46,965 square feet (1.01 acres) 21,962 square feet (32%) 58 vehicular, 3 handicapped, 3 bicycle, and 2 motorcycle 62 vehicular, 6 handicapped, 3 bicycle, and 2 motorcycle 17 per cent .21 3,500 square feet 3,500 square feet 21'-6 5/8" 11,100 square feet 8335 square feet 33'-11 5/8" R:~D P~002~02-0120 Margarita Medical Phase 2~Staff report.doc 2 BACKGROUND The applicant submitted a formal application to the Planning Department on March 11,2002. The project was deemed incomplete on April 18, 2002. The applicant incorporated the comments from staff and resubmitted exhibits on May 28, 2002. On June 10, 2002, the project was deemed complete and scheduled for Planning Commission on June 26, 2002. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The applicant, Medical Real Estate Development Company, is proposing a Development Plan to construct, operate and establish two (2) new medical office buildings, which will be located on the parcel just south of the existing medical buildings, which have been newly developed on the southeast corner of Margarita Road and N.General Kearney Road. The new buildings will be situated on the westerly portion of the site, fronting Margarita Road, with parking to be located on the rear of the lot. The site will have its primary access from North General Kearny Road. A second driveway will access the site from Margarita Road. Both points of access entering the site will connect to internal drive aisles that will allow circulation to pass in front of the buildings and provide access to four rows of parking. The amhitecture of the building can be defined as Eclectic Mediterranean, consistent with the architecture of the existing buildings to the north. The exterior finishes of the proposed office buildings will also be consistent with the existing building(s). The new buildings proposed, will incorporate the use of stone, cast concrete, and stucco. On the lower two feet of the base of the building limestone tile in a light tan capped with pro-cast concrete molding will be incorporated. The windows around the building will be smoke gray tinted glass with dark bronze anodized aluminum frames. Between the windows will be sectioned stucco panels finished in Desert Fawn (beige), which will appear as columns supporting the upper fascia of the building. The upper portions of the building above the windows will be hand toweled smooth stucco with some irregularities, finished again in Desert Fawn. Accenting on this upper wall facade will be a narrow stucco finished relief molding that will connect keystone elements over each window. Capping the building is a pitched roof, using "S" tile described as Buff Blend color (Identical to the building to the nor/h). Small gable accents over the offset portions of both buildings provide relief to roof. All exposed graded surfaces and setbacks will be landscaped with a combination of trees and shrubs. The 32-foot Landscape Development Zone (LDZ) aroa, as required by the Campos Verdes Specific Plan, includes the 12-foot parkway along both Margarita Road and N. General Kearney Road. The LDZ has been planted with 24" box London Plane trees, 15-gallon California Pepper trees and turf. The landscape planting material from the LDZ to the buildings and along the Margarita Road frontage will be a continuation of the planting material approved under the first phase of the project. The plant material for this area will consist of California Pepper trees, Fern Pines, Fortnight Iris's, Purple New Zealand Flax and daylilies. Landscaped planters have been provided at the perimeter boundaries of ali property lines. The planters will be planted with a variety of shrubs, groundcover and trees. Parking lot planters seven feet wide have been provided within the parking area incorporating the use of Fern Pines, Chinese Flame trees and assorted shrubs and ground cover. ANALYSIS Building Design The proposed building design is consistent the Campos Verdes Specific Plan, the City-Wide Design Guidelines and the City of Temecula Development Code. The Campos Verdes Specific Plan R:'~D P~002~02-0120 Margarita Medical Phase 2',Staff report,doc 3 Amhitectural Guidelines recommends Eclectic Mediterranean as the master style for the community. The architecture of the buildings proposed incorporates various design elements consistent with this type of architecture, such as second story balconies with balustrades, tile roofing, monolithic forms accomplished by symmetrical continuous reglets and deep-set openings as seen atthe tower entry elements. Considering these enhancements the overall design of the buildings identify the Mediterranean influence and will meet this overall goal. Landscaping The landscaping for the project complies with the Campos Verdes Specific Plan, the City-Wide Design Guidelines and the Development Code. As required bythe Campos Verdes Specific Plan, at least 15% of the site must be landscaped and this project is providing 32 per cent with the bulk of the landscaping being provided along the two street frontages. The Campos Verdes Specific Plan specifies a 32 foot landscape zone (include the 12 foot parkway) along both roadways with a gradual 4:1 slope lined with random placement of trees with turf. The primary trees along Margarita Road will be London Plane (24" box) and California Pepper (15 gal.) trees and will complement the landscaping installed for the first phase to the north. Parking / Circulation The parking circulation for the project complies with the Campos Verdes Specific Plan, the City- Wide Design Guidelines and the Development Code. Based on the Campos Verdes Specific Plan's parking standard of one space per 250 square feet of floor area, a minimum of 58 parking spaces must be provided. As designed, the applicant is proposing 61 vehicle parking spaces to meet what they believe will be their realistic parking needs. The proposed site at the southwest corner of Margarita Road and North General Kearny Roads will have its primary access from North General Kearny Road. A second driveway will access the site from Margarita Road across the southerly portion of the parcel. The driveway taking access off of Margarita Road will be right in right out. Both points of access entering the site connect to internal drive aisles that will allow circulation to pass in front of the buildings and prcvide access to four rows of parking. The site circulation is functional and has been determined to be adequate by the Fire Department. Site Design The site design for the project complies with the Campos Verdes Specific Plan, the City-Wide Design Guidelines and the Development Code in that the applicant has encouraged pedestrian linkages, gathering places and careful parking orientation. The two buildings proposed along the Margarita Road frontage, will assist in creating a pedestrian orientation to Margarita Road. The proposed two-story 11,100 square foot office building will be located just to the south of the single story building with a common walkway linking all the suites in each building to the sidewalk on North General Kearny Road. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION This project is within the Campos Verdes Specific Plan No. I for which an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared and certified. Under California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15162 (Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations) this project is exempt and a Notice of Exemption has been prepared for Planning Application No. 02-0120. Section 15162 applies when an EiR has been certified or negative declaration adopted for a project, no subsequent EIR shall be prepared for that project unless there are substantial changes not discussed or examined in the EIR. R:~D P~2002',02-0120 Margarita Medical Phase 2~taff report.doc 4 The affected area of the site development meets the criteria noted in that the development is consistent with the Campos Verdes Specific Plan No. I land uses, which anticipated chumhes, offices, and retail uses. Therefore, the proposed project is eligible for a CEQA exemption pursuant to Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines. EXISTING ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION The General Plan Land Use designation for the site is Professional Office (PO). Existing zoning for the site is SP-6 (Specific Plan-6 Campos Verdes). A variety of office and conditional uses are permitted within this zone, with the approval of a Development Plan or Conditional Use Permit pursuant to Chapter 17.05 of the Development Code. The project as proposed, meets all minimum standards of, and is consistent with, the General Plan, the Campos Verdes Specific Plan, the Development Code, and the Design Guidelines. SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS The project has been determined by staff to be consistent with applicable City policies, standards and guidelines. We believe, given the additional conditions placed on the project, it is compatible and compliant with the uses and quality of surrounding development, and will represent an aesthetic addition to the City's Professional Office areas. FINDINGS - DEVELOPMENT PLAN The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the city. The proposed medical office buildings are permitted in the Professional Office (PO) land use designation standards for Professional Office contained in the Campos Verdes Specific Plan and the City's Development Code. The project is also consistent with the Professional Office (PO)landusedesignationcontainedintheGeneralPlan. Thesiteispropedyplannedand zoned, and as conditioned, is physically suitable for the type and density of office development proposed. The project, as conditioned, is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local ordinances, including the Califomia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City Wide Design Guidelines, Ordinance No. 655 (Mt. Palomar Lighting Ordinance), the City's Water Efficient Landscaping provisions, and fire and building codes. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The overall design of the project, including the site, building, parking, circulation and other associated site improvements, is consistent with, and intended to protect the health and safety of those working in and around the site. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety and welfare. R:',D P~2002~02-0120 Margarita Medicat Phase 2\Staff repo~l,doc 5 Attachments: 1. PC Resolution - Blue Page 7 Exhibit A, Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 10 Exhibits - A. B. C. D. E. F. G. I. J. k. L. M. Blue Page 22 Vicinity Map Zoning Map General Plan Site Plan Building-A Elevations Building-A Floor Plan Building-B Elevations Building-B 1st Floor Plan Building-B 2"d Floor Plan Landscape Plan Building-B Roof Plan Typical Sections Conceptual Grading Plan R:'~D P~2002~2-0120 Marga,fita Medical Phase 2\Staff report.doc 6 A'I-I'ACHMENT NO. 1 PC RESOLUTION NO. 02-___ R:~D P~002~2o0120 Margarita Medical Phase 2\Staff report.doc 7 PC RESOLUTION NO. 02- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 02- 0120 - A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION AND ESTABLISHMENT OF TWO MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDINGS ON 1.5 ACRES WITH BUILDING "A" HAVING 3,500 SQUARE FEET AND BUILDING "B" HAVING 11,100 SQUARE FEET, TOTALING 14,600 SQUARE FEET, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF MARGARITA ROAD AND NORTH GENERAL KEARNY ROAD, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. APN 921-810-008. WHEREAS, Margarita Medical Condo Development, LLC, filed Planning Application No. 02- 0120, in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code; WHEREAS, Planning Application No. 02-0120 was processed including, but not limited to public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. 02-0120 on June 26, 2002 at duly noticed public hearings as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission approved Planning Application No. 00-0417; NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. by reference. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated Section 2. Findin.qs. The Planning Commission, in approving Planning Application No. 02-0120 hereby makes the following findings as required by Section 17.05.010.F of the Temecula Municipal Code: The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the city. The proposed medical office buildings are permitted in the Professional Office (PO) land use designation standards for Professional Office contained in the Campos Verdes Specific Plan and the City's Development Code. The project is also consistent with the Professional Office (PO) land use designation contained in the General Plan. The site is properly planned and zoned, and as conditioned, is physically suitable for the type and density of office development proposed. The project, as conditioned, is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local ordinances, including the Califomia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City Wide Design Guidelines, Ordinance No. 655 (Mt. Palomar Lighting Ordinance), the City's Water Efficient Landscaping provisions, and fire and building codes. R:\D P~2002~2-0120 Margarita Medical Phase 2\Staff report.doc 8 The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The overall design of the project, including the site, building, parking, circulation and other associated site improvements, is consistent with, and intended to protect the health and safety of those working in and around the site. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety and welfare. Section 3. Environmental Compliance. A Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. 02-0120 was made per the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15162. This section applies when an Environmental impact Report (EIR) has been certified or negative declaration adopted for a project, no subsequent EIR shall be prepared for that project unless there are substantial changes not discussed or examined in the EIR. Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby conditionally approves Planning Application No. 02-0120 for a Development Plan to design, construct, and operate two medical office buildings 14,600 square feet of floor space (Bldg. "A" with 3,500 square feet and Bldg. "B" with 11,100 square feet) on a 1.5 acre lot on the southeast corner of Margarita Road and North General Kearny Road, and known as Assessor Parcel No. 921-810-008. The Conditions of Approval are contained in Exhibit A. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 26th day of June 2002. ATTEST: Dennis Chiniaeff, Chairperson Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary {SEAL} STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Debbie U bnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that PC Resolution No 02- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 26th day of June, 2002, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary R:~D P~2002~02-0120 Margarita Medical Phase 2\Staff report.doc 9 EXHIBIT A CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN R:',D P~002~02-0120 Margarita Medical Phase 2~Staff report.doc 10 EXHtBIT A CiTY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No. 02-0120 (Development Plan) Project Description: The design, construction, and operation of two medical office buildings on 1.5 acres with building "A" having 5,987 square feet and building "B" having 7,270 square feet, totaling 13,257 square feet, located on the southeast corner of Margarita Road and North General Kearny Road. DIF Category: Office Assessor Parcel No.: 921-810-008 Approval Date: June 26, 2002 Expiration Date: June 26, 2004 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project The applicant shall deliver to the Community Development Department - Planning Division a cashiers check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of sixty-four Dollars ($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21108(b) and California Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant has not delivered to the Community Development Department - Planning Division the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c). General Requirements The permittee/applicant shall indemnify, protect and hold harmless, the City and any agency or instrumentality thereof, and/or any of its officers, employees, and agents from any and all claims, actions, or proceedings against the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its officers, employees, and agents, to attack, set aside, void, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting from an approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application which action is brought within the appropriate statute of limitations period and Public Resources Code, Division 13, Chapter 4 (Section 21000 et seq., including but not by the way of limitations Section 21152 and 21167). The City shall promptly notify the permittee/applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding brought forth within this time period. The City shall estimate the cost of the defense of the action and applicant shall deposit said amount with the City. City may require additional deposits to cover anticipated costs. City shall refund, without interest, any unused portions of the deposit once the litigation is finally concluded. Should the City fail to either promptly R:~D P~2002~02-0120 Margarita Medical Phase 2\Staff report.doc 11 10. 11. notify or cooperate fully, permittee/applicant shall not, thereafter be responsible to indemnify, defend, protect, or hold harmless the City, any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its officers, employees, or agents. Should the applicant fail to timely post the required deposit, the Director may terminate the land use approval without further notice to the applicant. This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. The applicant shall comply with mitigation measures 5-2, 5-6, 8-1,13-1,13-2, 13-3, 20-1,27- 11, 32-1, 32-3, and 32-4 contained in the approved Mitigation Monitoring Program for the Campos Verdes Specific Plan's Environment Impact Report. The applicant shall comply with the Conditions of Approval for Specific Plan No. 1 (Campos Verdes) and Planning Application No. 99-0015 (Amendment No. 1) unless superoeded by these Conditions of Approval. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibit "D" (Site Plan) and Exhibit "M" (Conceptual Grading Plan, contained on file with the Community Development Department - Planning Division. Additionally, the following criteria must be met prior to development of the project: a. All ground mounted utility/mechanical equipment shall be located such that they are not placed in prominent locations visible to the public. Any outside wall-mounted lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way. Details of these lights shall be submitted to the Planning Department during plan check for review prior to installation. The installation of wall pack style light shall not be used along the street side elevation. All parking lot lights and other exterior lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and Safety for plan check approval and shall comply with the requirements of Riverside County Ordinance No. 655. The maximum height of parking lot lights is 32 feet per Campos Verdes Specific Plan. Building elevations and floor plans shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibit "E" (Building A Elevations), Exhibit "F" (Building-A Floor Plans), Exhibit "G" (Building-B Elevations), Exhibit "H" (Building-B Ist Floor Plan), Exhibit "1" (Building- B 2n~ Floor Plan), Exhibit "K" (Building-B Roof Plan) and Exhibit "L" (Typical Sections) contained on file with the Community Development Department - Planning Division as amended by these changes: a. All mechanical and roof-mounted equipment shall be hidden by building elements that were designed for that purpose as an integral part of the building. When determined to be necessary by the Director of Planning, the parapet will be raised to provide for this screening. All building and monuments signs shall comply with Campos Verdes Specific Plan Sections III.C.2.c. and IV.B.4.a. as they relate to Commercial/office signs. Landscaping shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibit "J" (Landscape Plan). Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable R:~D P~2002~02-0120 Margarita Medical Phase 2~,Staff reporLdoc 12 12. satisfaction of the Director of Planning. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the Director of Planning shall have the authority to require the property owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any successors in interest. Additionally, the following criteria must be met prior to development of the project: a. The landscaping at the entries to the sites shall be consistent with Figure IV-19 in the Campos Verdes Specific Plan. The colors and materials for this project shall substantially conform to the following list of approved colors and materials and with Exhibit "N" Color and Material Board contained on file with the Community Development Department - Planning Division. Any deviation from the approved colors and materials shall require approval of the Director of Planning. Material Windows, doors Wall base Wall face Accent Band (lower) Accent keystones (upper) Clay Roof Tile Stained Wood Finish & Color Dark Bronze anodized frames with smoke-grey tinted glazing Limestone veneer (Mauve Napolina) Desert Fawn, Frazee 8222W (beige) Pre-cast concrete Misty Mica, Frazee 8711W Buff Blend, Redland Clay Company Desert Fawn, Frazee 8222W Prior to the Issuance of Grading Permits 13. The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be provided by the Community Development Department - Planning Division staff, and return one signed set to the Community Development Department - Planning Division for their files. 14. Two copies of a Phase I archaeological report shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Department. Any recommendations contained in that report shall be implemented. 15. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that Ordinance or by providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid. 16. If necessary the applicant shall revise Exhibits "D, E, F. G, H, I, J, K, L and M", (Site Plan, Elevations, Floor Plans, Roof Plan, Landscape Plan, Conceptual Grading Plan and Color and Material Board) to reflect the final Conditions of Approval and submit five (5) full size copies. 17. The applicant shall submit to the Community Development Department - Planning Division for permanent filing two (2) 8" X 10" glossy photographic color prints of Exhibit "N" the Color and Materials Board and of the colored version of approved Exhibit "O", the colored amhitectural elevations to the Community Development Department - Planning Division for their files. All labels on the Color and Materials Board and Elevations shall be readable on the photographic prints. Prior to the Issuance of Building Permits 18, A Consistency Check fee shall be paid per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule. R:'~D P~002~2-0120 Margarita Medical Phase 2~Staff report.doc 13 19. Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be submitted to the Community Development Department - Planning Division for approval. These plans shall conform substantially with the approved Exhibit "J", or as amended by these conditions. The location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The cover page shall identify the total square footage of the landscaped area for the site. The plans shall be accompanied by the following items: a. Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal). b. One (1) copy of the approved grading plan. c. Water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water Efficient Ordinance). d. Total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with the approved plan). Prior to the Issuance of Occupancy Permits 20. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Director of Planning. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working order. 21. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Planning, to guarantee the maintenance of the plantings, in accordance with the approved construction landscape and irrigation plan shall be filed with the Community Development Department - Planning Division for one year from final certificate of occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping and irrigation system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Director of Planning, the applicant shall release the bond upon request. 22. The applicant shall submit a landscape maintenance program prior to the issuance of a building permit. 23. A permanently affixed reflectorized sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying the International Symbol of Accessibility, shall identify each parking space reserved for the handicapped. The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square inches in area and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space at a minimum height of 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space finished grade, or centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space finished grade, ground, or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each entrance to the off-street parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches, clearly and conspicuously stating the following: "Unauthorized vehicles parked in designated accessible spaces not displaying distinguishing placards or license plates issued for persons with disabilities may be towed away at owner's expense. Towed vehicles may be reclaimed by telephoning 909 696-3000." In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall have a surface identification sign duplicating the Symbol of Accessibility in blue paint of at least 3 square feet in size. 24. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. R:~D P~2002~02-0120 Margarita Medical Phase 2~Staff report.doc DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 25. Unless otherwise noted, the Developer at no cost to any Government Agency shall complete all conditions. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the site plan all existing and proposed property lines, easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and revision. General Requirements 26. A Grading Permit for either rough and/or precise grading, including all on-site flat work and improvements, shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained street right-of-way. 27. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way. 28. All improvement plans and grading plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars. Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit 29. A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include all necessary erosion control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and private property. 30. The Developer shall post secudty and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works. 31. A Soil Report shall be prepared by a registered Soil or Civil Engineer and submitted to the Director of the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and pavement sections. 32. A Geological Report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address special study zones and the geological conditions of the site, and shall provide recommendations to mitigate the impact of ground shaking and liquefaction. 33. The Developer shall have a Drainage Study prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in accordance with City Standards identifying storm water runoff expected from this site and upstream of this site. The study shall identify all existing or proposed public or private drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. The study shall also analyze and identify impacts to downstream properties and provide specific recommendations to protect the properties and mitigate any impacts. The Developer shall provide any upgrading or upsizing of downstream facilities, including acquisition of drainage er access easements necessary to make required improvements. 34. The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No R:~D P~002\02-0120 Margarita Medical Phase 2\Staff report.doc 15 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or the project is shown to be exempt. As deemed necessary by the Director of the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Planning Department Department of Public Works Building and Safety Department City of Temecula Fire Prevention Bureau The Developer shall comply with all constraints, which may be shown upon an Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject property. Permanent landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department and the Department of Public Works for review and approval. The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or slope easements for off-site work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public Works. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation Distdct by either cashier's check or money order, prior to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area drainage plan fee. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid. Prior to Issuance of a Building Permit 40. Improvement plans and/or precise grading plans shall conform to applicable City of Temecula Standards subject to approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works. The following design criteria shall be observed: a. Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over A.C. paving. b. All concentrated drainage directed towards the public street shall be conveyed through under sidewalk drains. 41. The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance with the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered Civil Engineer, and the Soil Engineer shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions. 42. The Developer shall obtain/grant an easement for ingress, egress and parking over the adjacent property. 43. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06. R:'tD P~2002~02-0120 Margarita Medical Phase 2~Staff report.doc 16 Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy 44. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: a, Rancho California Water District b. Eastern Municipal Water District c. Department of Public Works 45. All public improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and City standards to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works. 46. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works. BUILDING DEPARTMENT 47. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 1998 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 1998 National Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy and Disabled Access Regulations and the Temecula Municipal Code. 48. Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plans showing compliance with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All streetlights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way. 49. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted to the Building & Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School Mitigation Fees. 50. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. 51. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review. 52. Disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building is required. The path of travel shall meet the California Disabled Access Regulations in terms of cress slope, travel slope stripping and signage. Provide all details on plans. (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1, 1998) 53. All building and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations. Provide all details on plans. (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1,1998) 54. Provide disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building. 55. Provide van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entry. 56. Provide house electrical meter provisions for power for the operation of exterior lighting, fire alarm systems. R:'~D P~002~2-0120 Margarita Medical Phase 2\Staff report.doc 17 57. Restroom fixtures, number and type, to be in accordance with the provisions of the 1998 edition of the California Building Code Appendix 29. 58. Provide an approved automatic fire sprinkler system. 59. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans prior to permit issuance. 50. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic and mechanical plan for plan review. 61. Truss calculations that are stamped by the engineer of record and the truss manufacturer engineer are required for plan review submittal. 62. Provide precise grading plan for plan check submittal to check for handicap accessibility. 53. A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the building construction. 64. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standard and any block walls if not on the approved building plans, will require separate approvals and permits. 65. Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrance to the project that indicates the hours of construction, shown below, as allowed by the City of Temecula Ordinance No. 0-90-04, specifically Section G (1) of Riverside County Ordinance No. 457.73, for any site within one- quarter mile of an occupied residence. Monday-Friday: 6:30 a.m. - 6:30 p.m. Saturday: 7:00 a.m. - 6:30 p.m. No work is permitted on Sunday or Government Holidays FIRE DEPARTMENT 66. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when the Fire Prevention Bureau reviews building plans. These conditions will be based on occupancy; use, the California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes, which are in force at the time of building, plan submittal. 67. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all commercial buildings per CFC Appendix III.A, Table A-III-A-1. The developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 1500 G PM at 20-PSI residual operating pressure, plus an assumed sprinkler demand of 400 GPM for a total fire flow of 1900 GPM with a 2-hour duration. The required fire flow may be adjusted during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire Flow as given above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC 903.2, Appendix Ill-A) 68. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC Appendix Ill-B, Table A-III-B-1. A minimum of 1 hydrant, in a combination of on-site and off- site (6" x 4" x 2-2 1/2" outlets) shall be located on Fire Department access roads and adjacent public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 500 feet apart, at each intersection and shall be located no more than 250 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department R:',D P~002~02-0120 Margarita Medical Phase 2~Staff report.doc 18 69. 70. 71. 72. 73. 74. 75. 76. 77. 78. 79. access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required. (CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix Ill-B) As required by the California Fire Code, when any portion of the facility is in excess of 150 feet from a water supply on a public street, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the facility, on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided. For this project on site fire hydrants are required. (CFC 903.2) Maximum cul-de-sac length shall not exceed 1320 feet. Minimum turning radius on any cul- de-sac shall be forty-five (45) feet. (CFC 902.2.2.2.3 and Subdivision Ord 16.03.020) If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection prior to any building construction. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2) Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access reads for use until permanent roads are installed. Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface for 80,000 lbs. GVW. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2) Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved Fire Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or any portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface designed for 80,000 lbs. GVW with a minimum AC thickness of .25 feet. (CFC sec 902) Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13) feet six (6) inches. (CFC 902.2.2.1) The gradient for fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed fifteen (15) percent. (CFC 902.2.2.6 Ord. 99-14) Prior to building construction, dead end roadways and streets in excess of one hundred and fifty (150) feet that have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of accommodating fire apparatus. (CFC 902.2.2.4) Prior to building construction, this development shall have two (2) points of access, via all- weather surface roads, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 902.2.1) Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature block; and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. After the local water company signs the plans, the originals shall be presented to the Fire Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system including fire hydrants shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building materials being placed on an individual lot. (CFC 8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and National Fire Protection Association 24 1-4.1 ) Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective Markers" shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations. (CFC 901.4.3) R:",D P~2002~02-0120 Margarita Medical Phase 2~Staff report.doc 19 80. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, approved numbers or addresses shall be provided on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Numbers shall be of a contrasting color to their background. Commercial, multi-family residential and industrial buildings shall have a minimum twelve (12) inches numbers with suite numbers a minimum of six (6) inches in size. All suites shall have a minimum of six (6) inch high letters and/or numbers on both the front and rear doors. Single-family residences and multi-family residential units shall have four (4) inch letters and/or numbers, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 901.4.4) 81. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on square footage and type of construction, occupancy or use, the developer shall install a fire sprinkler system. Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. (CFC Article 10, CBC Chapter 9) 82. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on a requirement for monitoring the sprinkler system, occupancy or use, the developer shall install an fire alarm system monitored by an approved Underwriters Laboratory listed central station. Plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. (CFC Article 10) 83. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a "Knox-Box" shall be provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six (6) feet in height and be located to the right side of the main entrance door. (CFC 902.4) 84. All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry system for emergency access by fire fighting personnel. (CFC 902.4) 85. Prior to final inspection of any building, the applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire Department for approval, a site plan designating Fire Lanes with appropriate lane painting and or signs. 86. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, the developer/applicant shall be responsible for obtaining underground and/or abovegreund tank permits for the storage of combustible liquids, flammable liquids or any other hazardous materials from both the County Health department and Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 7901.3 and 8001.3) Special Conditions 87. Prior to building permit issuance, a full technical report may be required to be submitted and to the Fire Prevention Bureau. This report shall address, but not be limited to, all fire and life safety measures per 1998 CFC, 1998 CBC, and NFPA - 13, 24, 72 and 231-C. 88. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final a simple plot plan and a simple floor plan, each as an electronic file of the .DWG format must be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau. Alternative file formats may be acceptable, contact fire prevention for approval. 89. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Fire Code permit process and update any changes in the items and quantities approved as part of their Fire Code permit. '[hese changes shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for review and approval per the Fire Code and is subject to inspection. (CFC 105) R:~D P~2002\02-0120 Margarita Medical Phase 2\Staff report.doc 20 90. The applicant shall submit for review and approval by the Riverside County Department of Environmental Health and City Fire Department an update to the Hazardous Material Inventory Statement and Fire Department Technical Report on file at the city; should any quantities used or stored onsite increase or should changes to operation introduce any additional hazardous material not listed in existing reports. (CFC Appendix II-E) COMMUNITY SERVICES 91. All parkway landscaping, the property owner or private maintenance association shall maintain slope areas and interior streetlights. 92. If additional trash enclosures are to be constructed the developer shall provide adequate space for a recycling bin within the trash enclosure areas. 93. The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of construction debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul construction debris. OTHER AGENCIES 94. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Rancho California Water District's transmittal dated March 27,2002, a copy of which is attached. 95. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Eastern Information Center, Department of Anthropology, University of California, transmittal dated March 19, 2001, a copy of which is attached. 96. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Riverside County Flood Control, transmittal dated May 16, 2002, and a copy of which is attached. By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be subject to Planning Commission approval. Applicant's Signature Name printed Date R:'~D P~2002~02-0120 Margarita Medical Phase 2~Staff report,doc 21 ATTACHMENT NO. 2 EXHIBITS R:'~D P~2002~2-0120 Margarita Medical Phase 2'~Stafl report.doc 22 CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 02-0120 (Development Plan) EXHIBIT A PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - June 26, 2002 VICINIT~ MAP R:~D P~2002~02-0120 Margarita Medical Phase 2\Staff report.doc CITY OF TEMECULA EXHIBIT B Z(~NING MAP DESIGNATION - SP-6 (Campos Verdes Specific Plan) EXHIBIT C GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION - OP (Office Professional) PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 02-0120 (Development Plan) PL~.NNING COMMISSION DATE - June 26, 2002 R:~D P~2002~02-0120 Margarita Medical Phase 2~Staff report.doc ClTY OFTEMECULA PROMENADE MEDICAL PLAZA TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA ^1.1 PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 02-0120 (Development Plan) EXHIBIT D PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - June 26, 2002 SITE PLAN R:~D P~2002~02-0120 Margarita Medical Phase 2~Staff report.doc ClTY OFTEMECULA PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 02-0120 (Development Plan) EXHIBIT E PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - June 26, 2002 BUILDING A ELEVATIONS R:~D P~2002~D2-0120 Margarita Medical Phase 2\Staff report.doc CITY OF TEMECULA A2.0 PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 02-0120 (Development Plan) EXHIBIT F PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - June 26, 2002 BUILDING A FLOOR PLAN R:~D P~2002~02-0120 Margarita Medical Phase 2\Staff report.doc 27 CITY OF TEMECULA im e ...... BUlu~I, vC ~'rJZV.4TIO~$ ..%5.5 PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 02-0120 (Development Plan) EXHIBIT G BUILDING B ELEVATIONS PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - June 26, 2002 R:~D P~2002~02-0120 Margarita Medical Phase 2¥Staff reporLdoc CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 02-0120 (Development Plan) EXHIBIT H PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - June 26, 2002 BUILDING B Ist FLOOR PLAN R:~D P~2002~02-0120 Margarita Medical Phase 2\Staff report.doc 29 CITY OFTEMECULA re] PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 02-0120 (Development Plan) EXHIBIT I PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - June 26, 2002 BUILDING B 2nd FLOOR PLAN R:~D P~2002~02-0120 Margarita Medica~ Phase 2~Staff report.doc 3O CITY OF TEMECULA PRELIMINARY PLANTING PLAN PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 02-0120 (Development Plan) EXHIBIT J PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - June 26, 2002 LANDSCAPE PLAN R:~D P~2002~02-0120 Margarita Medical Phase 2~Staff report.doc 31 CITY OF TEMECULA _...Bu~l~c '~' Roof Pz~ ~ A3.2 PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 02-0120 (Development Plan) EXHIBIT K PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - June 26, 2002 BUILDING B ROOF PLAN R:~D P~2002~02-O120 Margarita Medical Phase 2~Staff reporLdoc 32 CITY OF TEMECULA TYR BUILDli~ $~370N5 A4.1 PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 02-0120 (Development Plan) EXHIBIT L PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - June 26, 2002 TYPICAL SECTIONS R:~D P~2002~)2-O120 Margarita Medical Phase 2~Staff report.doc 33 CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 02-0120 (Development Plan) EXHIBIT M PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - June 26, 2002 CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN R:~D P~2002~02-0120 Margarita Medical Phase 2~Staff report.doc 34