HomeMy WebLinkAbout082702 CC AgendaIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this
meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (909) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will
enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35,102.35.104
ADA Title II]
AGENDA
TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
A REGULAR MEETING
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE
AUGUST 27, 2002 - 7:00 P.M.
At approximately 9:45 P.M., the City Council will determine which of the remaining agenda items
can be considered and acted upon prior to 11:00 P.M. and may continue all other items on which
additional time is required until a future meeting. All meetings are scheduled to end at 11:00 P.M.
5:30 P,M. - Closed Session of the City Council pursuant to Government Code
Sections:
Conference with City Attorney and legal counsel pursuant to Government
Code Section 54956.8 regarding real property acquisition negotiations of
property located along Diaz Road (APN 921-040-028), north of Ranc ho
California Road, and at the northwest corner of Rancho California Road and
Business Park Drive {APN 921-020-039). Under negotiation is the price and
terms of the real property interests. The City negotiators are Shawn Nelson a
and Bill Hughes.
Conference with City Attorney and legal counsel pursuant to Government
Code Section 54956.9(a) with respect to two matters of existing litigation
involving the City. The following case wil be discussed: 1) City of Temecula
v. Riverside County (Tucalotta Hills Associates) and 2) City of Temecula v.
Riverside County (Domenigoni-Barton).
Conference with City Attorney pursuant to Government Code Section 54957
and 54957.6 with respect to City Manager's Evaluation.
Public Information concerning existing litigation between the City and various parties
may be acquired by reviewing the public documents held by the City Clerk.
CALL TO ORDER:
Prelude Music:
Invocation:
Flag Salute:
R:~Agenda\082702
Mayor Ron Roberts
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. 2002-04
Resolution: No. 2002-72
Sarah Cravers
Pastor Chuck Perry of Calvary Chapel of Temecula
Councilman Comerchero
ROLL CALL: Comerchero, Naggar, Pratt, Stone, Roberts
PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS
Award of Valor to Gloria Dixon and Lisa Jensen
Certificates of Achievement to the Temecula-Murrieta Soccer Club for attaininq the State
Championship
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 30 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Council on
items that appear within the Consent Calendar or ones that are not listed on the agenda.
Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council on
an item which is listed on the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda, a
pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record,
For all Public Hearing or Council Business matters on the agenda, a "Request to
Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk prior to the Council addressing that item.
There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made
at this time. A total, not to exceed, ten (10) minutes will be devoted to these reports.
CONSENT CALENDAR
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will
be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless
Members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent
Calendar for separate action.
1 Standard Ordinance and Resolution Adoption Procedure
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the
agenda.
2 Approval of Minutes.
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve the minutes of July 9, 2002;
2.2 Approve the minutes of July 17, 2002.
R:~Agenda\082702
2
3
5
6
Resolution Approvin,q List of Demands
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 02-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS
AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
Appropriation of Local Law Enforcement Block Grant (LLEBG) Funds
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Approve expenditure of Local Law Enforcement Block Grant Funds and local match
funds in the amount of $143,329.00 for the purchase of police equipment.
Support of Chan'qes to California Meqan's Law
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 02-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA SUPPORTING CHANGES TO MEGAN'S LAW TO
ALLOW FOR GREATER PUBLIC INFORMATION ABOUT
REGISTERED SEX OFFENDERS TO BE MADE AVAILABLE TO
THE RESIDENTS OF CALIFORNIA IN A MANNER
CONSISTENT WITH THE GUIDELINES OF THE STATES OF
ARIZONA AND TEXAS
License A'qreement for the S.A.F.E. Pro,qram
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1 Approve the License Agreement between the City of Temecula and S.A.F.E.
Program far use of office space at the Temecula Community Center.
Award of Construction Contract for the Citywide Asphalt Concrete Repairs for FY2002-
2003 - Proiect No. PW02-04
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1 Award a construction contract for the Citywide Asphalt Concrete Repairs for
FY2002-2003 to All American Asphalt in the amount of $169,169.00 and authorize
the Mayor to execute the contract;
7.2 Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the
contingency amount of $16,916.90 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount.
3
R:~Agenda\082702
8 Parcel Map No. 30504 (located north of State Hi¢lhway 79 South, west of Meadows
Parkway, and south of Campanula Way)
9
RECOMMENDATION:
8.1 Approve Parcel Map No. 30504 in conformance with the conditions of approval.
Right-of-Way Easement for corner cutback at the southeast corner of the intersection of
Puiol Street and Sixth Street
RECOMMENDATION:
9.1 Accept the corner cutback area at the southeast corner of the intersection of Pujol
Street and Sixth Street as described in Exhibit A and shown in Exhibit B.
10
Acquisition Aqreement between the City of Temecula and Swedish American Corporation
RECOMMENDATION:
10.1 Approve and execute in substantially the form attached hereto, the Purchase and
Sale Agreement and Escrow Instructions between the City of Temecula and
Swedish American Corporation, a Nevada Corporation, for the acquisition of certain
real property in the amount of $58,908.00;
10.2 Direct the City Clerk to record the document;
10.3 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO, 02-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AUTHORIZING THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC
WORKS TO ACCEPT DEEDS OR GRANTS CONVEYING ANY
INTEREST IN OR EASEMENT UPON REAL ESTATE AS
PERMITTED BY GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 27281
RECESS CITY COUNCIL MEETING TO SCHEDULED MEETINGS OF
THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
AND THE CITY OF TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
R:~Agenda\082702
4
CALL TO ORDER: President Jeff Stone
ROLL CALL: DIRECTORS:
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. CSD 2002-01
Resolution: No. CSD 2002-08
Comerchere, Naggar, Pratt, Roberts, Stone
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Board of
Directors on items that are not tisted on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar.
Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you decide to speak to the Board of
Directors on an item not on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to
Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk
Prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit
for individual speakers.
Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors should present a completed pink
"Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please
come forward and state your name and address for the record.
CONSENTCALENDAR
1 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of July 23, 2002;
1.2 Approve the minutes of August 13, 2002.
2 Arts Council Community Grant A,qreement
RECOMMENDATION:
21
Approve the Community Grant Agreement between the Temecula Community
Services District (TCSD) and the Arts Council of Temecula Valley in the amount
of $40,000.00
R:~A'genda\082702
5
DEPARTMENTAL REPORT
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT
GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT
BOARD OF DIRECTORS' REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: Tuesday, September 17, 2002, 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 43200
Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
R:~Agenda\082702
6
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. RDA 2002-01
Resolution: No. RDA 2002-09
CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson JeffComerchero
ROLLCALL
AGENCY MEMBERS:
Naggar, Pratt, Stone, Roberts, Comerchero
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the
Redevelopment Agency on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent
Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you decide to speak to the
Board of Directors on an item not on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink
"Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk
Prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit
for individual speakers.
Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors should present a completed pink
"Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please
come forward and state your name and address for the record.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of August 13, 2002.
DEPARTMENTAL REPORT
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
AGENCY MEMBERS' REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: Tuesday, September 17, 2002, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park
Drive, Temecula, California.
R:~Agenda\082702
7
RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
PUBLIC HEARING
Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before a public Hearing or
may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the Approval of the project(s)
at the time of the hearing. If you challenge any of the project(s) in court, you may be
limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or
in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing.
11
Planning Application No. 99-0451 (General Plan Amendment from Open Space tn
Highway Tourist Commercial)
RECOMMENDATION:
11.1 Approve the General Plan Amendment changing the land use designation from
Open Space to Highway Tourist Commercial;
11.2 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 02-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING THE AMENDMENT OF THE
GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FOR A LOCATION ON
RANCHO HIGHLANDS DRIVE, IDENTIFIED AS ASSESSOR'S
PARCEL MAP NO. 944-330-019 (PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. 99-0451)
COUNCIL BUSINESS
12 Update on research related to formation of Municipal Utility
RECOMMENDATION:
12.1 Receive and file this background report. The Electrical Subcommittee members
(Councilmembers Naggar & Comerchero) will provide their perspective and
recommendations on this information.
DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: City Council, Tuesday, September 17, 2002, at 7:00 P.M., City Council
Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
R:~Agenda\082702
8
PROCLAMATIONS
AND
PRESENTATIONS
ITEM 1
ITEM 2
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
JULY 9, 2002
After the Closed Session that convened at 6:00 P.M., the City Council convened in Open
Session at 7:02 P.M., on Tuesday, July 9, 2002, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula
City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
Present:
Absent:
PRELUDE MUSIC
Councilmembers: Comerchero, Naggar, Pratt, Roberts
Councilmember: Stone
The prelude music was provided by Erika Weitzeil:
INVOCATION
The invocation was given by Reverend Larry Koger of Hope Lutheran Church.
ALLEGIANCE
The flag ceremony was presented by Cub Scout Pack No. 318.
PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS
Ms. Leslie Martinez, Troop Leader for Troop No. 1523, thanked the City Council for its
recognition of the girls' achievements and briefly provided an overview of the responsibilities
associated with attaining this goal.
Mayor Robeds presented Special Achievement Awards to the following girls:
Special Achievement Award - Girl Scout Gold Award - Melissa Martinez
Special Achievement Award - Girl Scout Gold Award - Cassondra Sepulveda
Special Achievement Award - Girl Scout Silver Award - Erin Lyons
Special Achievement Award - Girl Scout Silver Award - Shannon Lyons
Special Achievement Award - Girl Scout Silver Award - Zulema Sotelo
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A. Commenting of the interference potential school sites as well as homes will have on the
flight pattern of the French Valley Airport, Mr. Chuck Washington, 31205 Kahwea Road, noted that
such interference will eliminate the ability to fully utilize the Airport as the economic development
tool, as it was designed, for this region and encouraged the City Council and the public to be
involved.
R:\Minutes\070902
1
B. Mr. Will Rogers, 32124 Corte Camara, addressed his desire to keep the residents' utility
rates down.
Commenting on information with regard to utility rates that Mr. Rogers had previously
forward to him, Councilman Naggar thanked Mr. Rogers for forwarding the information and advised
that he had forwarded it to Councilman Comerchero and Assistant City Manager O'Grady.
C. Ms. Kristin Salas, 32750 Vail Creek Drive, advised that the location of the proposed hyper-
WalMart would be behind her residence; commented on the impacts of such a store; noted that the
homeowners were not notified by mail of the hearings; and encouraged review of other alternatives
that would provide prosperity to the community without negative impacts.
D. Referencing the information sent by a WalMart representative to the City residents, Ms.
Michelle Anderson, 4379 Barletta Street, viewed the information as factually challenged and, as
well, commented on the negative impacts of such a store.
E. Mr. Peter Canellos, 41200 Murrieta Hot Springs Road, Community Affairs Manager for
WaIMart, advised that a traditional WalMart is being proposed with the option to expand. Mr.
Canellos noted that, in his opinion, information being distributed by some individuals is factually
incorrect.
F. Mr. Anthony de Esposito, 17552 Haze Avenue, Lake Elsinore, WalMart Associate, relayed
positive aspects of the company.
G. Mr. Mike Lynch, 33106 Fox Road, store manager for the Murrieta WaIMart, requested that
WaIMart be given a fair opportunity to service the residents..
H. Ms. Kimberly Mellick, 42275 Wild Mustang Road, Murrieta, WalMart Associate, as well
commented on the positive aspects of the company.
I. Mr. William Stone, 17140 Bernardo Street, San Diego, Price Legacy, developer of Redhawk
Town Center, commented on the amount of incorrect information provided about this project, noting
that a market analysis indicated support of a store as proposed; that WalMart would be desirous of
being a good neighbor; and that the proposed development will be less intensive than what was
originally planned in the original 1988 Environmental Impact Report.
J. Mr. Andrew Smith, 36058 Bergen Street, Winchester, apprised the City Council of his desire
to start a curb addressing business and requested that the City create a standard so that he may
legally operate within the City.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
A. Councilman Nagga,r commended Community Services Director Parker and the
Community Services Department staff on the Fourth of July Festivities and thanked the citizens
for their participation.
B. Reiterating that the proposed WalMart location is not within the City's boundaries nor
within the purview of the City Council, Councilman Comerchero encouraged those involved to
provide factual information to the public.
R:\Minutes\070902
2
After extensive meetings, Councilman Comerchero advised that the Board of Directors
of the Riverside Transit Agency (RTA) has approved express routes from Temecula to San
Diego and from Escondido to Corona.
C. Mayor Roberts noted that the Riverside County Transportation Committee (RCTC) may
possibly be able to assist RTA with the funding of these routes.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Standard Ordinance and Resolution Adoption Procedure
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the
agenda.
2 Approval of Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve the minutes of May 29, 2002.
3 Resolution Approvin.q List of Demands
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 02-60
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS
AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
4 City Treasurer's Report
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Receive and file the City Treasurer's Report as of May 31, 2002.
5 Authorization of Special Tax Levy in Community Facilities District NO. 88-12 (Ynez Corridor)
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 02-61
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX IN
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-12 (YNEZ
CORRIDOR)
R:\Minutes\070902
3
0 FY 2002-03 Economic Development Operatin,q/Marketin,q and Sponsorship Agreements
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1 Approve Operating/Marketing Agreements and authorize the Mayor to execute the
following agreements:
· The Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce in the amount of $148,000.00;
· The Economic Development Corporation of Southwest Riverside County in
the amount of $20,000.00;
· The Temecula Valley Film Council in the amount of $27,000.00;
· The Southwest Riverside County Economic Alliance in the amount of
$75,000.00.
Approve the Sponsorship and Funding Agreement for the Proiect Kids - Endless
Dreams - summer benefit in the amount of $1,500.00 and authorize the Mayor to
execute the agreement.
(Pulled for separate discussion; see page 7.)
7 FY 2002-03 Desiqnated Allocations - Community Support Budget
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1 Approve the Sponsorship and Funding Agreement in the amount of $25,000.00 and
City-support costs in the amount up to $8,000.00 for the Inland Empire Affiliate of
the Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation - Race for the Cure - event and
authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement;
7.2
Approve the Funding Agreement in the amount of $15,000.00 for the Circle of
SAFE-T Partnership/Rancho Springs Medical Center and authorize the Mayor to
execute the agreement;
7.3 Approve the Funding Agreement in the amount of $15,000.00 for Safe Alternatives
for Everyone (SAFE) program and authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement.
8 Second Amendment to City Manaqer's Employment A,qreement
RECOMMENDATION:
8.1 Approve the second amendment to the City Manager's Employment Agreement.
9 First Amendment to State Lobbyist Contract
RECOMMENDATION:
9.1 Approve the first amendment for State lobbying services with the Wilson Group, LLC
in the amount of $3,500.00 per month.
R:\Minutes\070902
4
10 David Turch & Associates Contract for Federal Legislative Services
RECOMMENDATION:
10.1 Approve the contract for Federal legislative services to be provided by David Turch
& Associates in the amount $36,000.00.
11 Acceptance of an Irrevocable Offer of Dedication of Grant of Easement for drainage
purposes within Parcel No. 1 of Parcel Map No. 22554
RECOMMENDATION:
11.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO, 02-62
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ACCEPTING AN IRREVOCABLE OFFER OF
DEDICATION OF GRANT OF EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGE
PURPOSES WITHIN PARCEL NO. I OF PARCEL MAP NO,
22554
12 Amendment No. 2 to Construction Contract for fiscal year 2002-2003 Street Striping
Pro!qram - Project No. PW01-12
RECOMMENDATION:
12.1 Approve Amendment No. 2 to the Construction Contract with C-18, Inc. for the fiscal
year 2002-2003 Street Striping Contract - Project No. PW01-12 for an amount of
$225,000.00 and authorize the Mayor to execute the amendment.
13 Amendment No. 3 with West Coast Arborists, Inc. for renewal of Citywide Tree Trimmin~q
Maintenance Contract
RECOMMENDATION:
13.1 Approve Amendment No. 3 for the extension of the Citywide Tree Trimming
Maintenance Services Contract with West Coast Arborists, Inc. for a period of one
year beginning July 1, 2002 in an amount of $100,000.00 and authorize the Mayor
to execute the contract extension;
13.2 Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the
contingency amount of $10,000.00 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount.
14 A.qreement for Consultinq Services between the City of Temecula and PELA
RECOMMENDATION:
14.1 Award a contract with PELA for landscape, plancheck, and inspection services in
the amount of $75,000.00.
R:\Minutes\070902
5
15 Morgan H II Proiect Mitigation A,qreement - Approval of Consent to Assi,qnment to McMillin
Mor,qan Hill and Approval of Joint Community Facilities Agreement
RECOMMENDATION:
15.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 02-63
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING THAT CERTAIN AGREEMENT
ENTITLED ASSIGNMENT OF MITIGATION AGREEMENT AND
CITY CONSENT BETWEEN THE TR4, L.P. AND MCMILLIN
MORGAN HILL, LLC
15.2 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 02-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING THAT CERTAIN AGREEMENT
ENTITLED JOINT COMMUNITY FACILITIES AGREEMENT
AMONG EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT AND CITY
OF TEMECULA AND MCMILLIN MORGAN HILL, LLC
(Recommendation `15.t was approved and '16.2 was continued to the City Council
meeting of July 23, 20020
16 Aqreement for Weed Abatement Services between the City of Temecula and Rory Rieck
and Chuck Maciel's Weed Abatement
RECOMMENDATION:
16.1 Approve the contract with Rory Rieck and Chuck Maciers Weed Abatement for
Weed Abatement Services for a total of $15,000.00.
17 Agreement for Weed Abatement Services between the City of Temecula and A.S.A.P.
Services
RECOMMENDATION:
17.1 Approve the contract with A.S.A.P. Services for Weed Abatement Services for a
total of $15,000.00.
MOTION: Councilman Naggar moved to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1 - 5 and 7- 17
(Consent Calendar Item No. 6 was pulled for separate discussion; see below). The motion
was seconded by Councilman Comerchero and voice vote reflected approval with the
exception of Mayor Pro Tem Stone who was absent.
R:\Minutes\070902
6
CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM CONSIDERED UNDER SEPARATE DISCUSSION
6 FY 2002-03 Economic Development Operating/Marketing and Sponsorship Agreements
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1 Approve Operating/Marketing Agreements and authorize the Mayor to execute
the following agreements:
The Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce in the amount of $148,000.00;
· The Economic Development Corporation of Southwest Riverside County in
the amount of $20,000.00;
· The Temecula Valley Film Council in the amount of $27,000.00;
· The Southwest Riverside County Economic Alliance in the amount of
$75,OOO.OO.
6.2 Approve the Sponsorship and Funding Agreement for the Project Kids - Endless
Dreams - summer benefit in the amount of $1,500.00 and authorize the Mayor to
execute the agreement.
For Councilman Pratt, Assistant City Manager O'Grady provided clarification as to the marketing
services that will be provided as a result of the proposed sponsorship.
MOTION: Councilman Comerchero moved to approve Consent Calendar Item No. 6. The
motion was seconded by Councilman Pratt and voice vote reflected approval with the
exception of Mayor Pro Tem Stone who was absent.
At 7:43 P M., the City Council convened as the Temecula Community Services District, the
Temecula Redevelopment Agency, and the Winchester Hills Financing Authority. The City
Council Meeting resumed will regular business at 7:48 P.M.
PUBLIC HEARING
18 Modifications of Conditions of Approval for Amendment No. 7 of the Paloma del Sol Specific
Plan and the Conditions of Approval for revised Vestinq Tentative Tract Map No. 24182
(Planninq Application No. 02-0299)
RECOMMENDATION:
18.1 Adopt one of the following resolutions entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 02-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA MODIFYING THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
FOR AMENDMENT NO. 7 OF THE PALOMA DEL SOL
SPECIFIC PLAN ALSO KNOWN AS PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. 99-0285 (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 02-0299)
R:\Minutes\070902
7
OR
RESOLUTION NO. 02-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA REJECTING THE REQUEST BY NEWLAND
COMMUNITIES TO MODIFY THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
FOR AMENDMENT NO. 7 OF THE PALOMA DEL SOL
SPECIFIC PLAN ALSO KNOWN AS PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. 99-0285 (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 02-0299)
18.2 Adopt one of the following resolutions:
RESOLUTION NO. 02-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA MODIFYING THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
FOR REVISED VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 24182
ALSO KNOWN AS PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 96-0258
(PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 02-0299)
OR
RESOLUTION NO. 02-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA REJECTING THE REQUEST BY NEWLAND
COMMUNITIES TO MODIFY THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
FOR REVISED VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 24182
ALSO KNOWN AS PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 96-0258
(PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 02-0299)
Mayor Roberts opened the public hearing.
MOTION: Councilman Comerchero moved to continue this item to the July 23, 2002, City
Council meeting. The motion was seconded by Councilman Naggar and voice vote reflected
approval with the exception of Mayor Pro Tem Stone who was absent.
COUNCIL BUSINESS
19 City Alcohol Regulations
RECOMMENDATION:
19.1 Receive and file.
Deputy City Manager Thornhill provided an overview of the staff report (of record), noting that
the proposed modifications will provide the City the opportunity to create a tighter control over
the process of new businesses selling alcohol products. For Councilman Naggar, City Attorney
noted that the existing Development Code does not need to be amended, noting that the
requirement of a Conditional Use Permit should resolve the identified problems.
R:\Minutes\070902
8
Although Deputy City Manager Thornhill noted that the proposed modifications are primarily
intended for off-premise sale/consumption of alcohol, Councilman Naggar requested that staff
address the matter to ensure that no undue measures are imposed on restaurant uses.
Suggesting that staff inform all League of California cities of the City's situation, Councilman
Comerchero recommended that action be taken at a State level to further ensure resolution.
MOTION: Councilman Naggar moved to receive and file the repeal and directed staff to provide
information to the League of California cities in order to further address issues at the State level.
The motion was seconded by Councilman Comerchero and voice vote reflected approval with
the exception of Mayor Pro Tem Stone who was absent.
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
City Manager Nelson thanked the City Council for its renewal of his employment agreement.
CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT
City Attorney Thorsen noted that there were no reportable items to repeal.
ADJOURNMENT
At 7:59 P.M., the City Council meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday July 17, 2002, at 6:00
P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California, for the
purpose of a Joint Council/Planning Commission Workshop.
ATTEST:
Ron Roberts, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
R:\Minutes\070902
9
MINUTES OF AN ADJOURNED REGULAR
JOINT CITY COUNCIL/PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP
JULY 17, 2002
CALL TO ORDER
The City Council and Planning Commission convened in an adjourned regular joint workshop at
6:06 P.M., on Tuesday, July 17, 2002, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hall, 43200
Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
ROLLCALL
Present: Councilmembers:
Planning Commissioners:
Absent:
Planning Commissioner:
ALLEGIANCE
Comerchero, Naggar, Pratt, Stone, and Robeds
Mathewson, OIhasso, Telesio, and Chiniaeff
Guerriero
The audience was led in the Flag salute by Councilman Comerchero.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No comments.
CITY COUNCIL/PLANNING COMMISSION REPORTS
Updating the Planning Commission and the City Council, Councilman Pratt noted that
earlier this morning he had attended a Third District (Supervisor Venable's District)
Workshop, which focused on transportation issues, advising that the meeting had been
informative.
Mayor Pro Tem Stone requested staff to obtain additional information regarding the
Monorail Project in the City of Las Vegas, requesting data concerning the following: the
consultant chosen, the costs of the project, and the funding mechanisms utilized.
For informational purposes, Mayor Pro Tem Stone noted that via City Clerk Jones he
would be forwarding photographs to the Councilmembers of various large bronze art
figures which represented samples of the type of ad he would like to see installed in the
City of Temecula at a future point.
For futura consideration, Commissioner Olhasso relayed her recommendation that
senior apartments be developed in the Target Center, and/or the Tower Plaza.
Chairman Chiniaeff advised that the continued encroachment by County residential
development, as well as the associated development of school sites near the French
Valley Airport, would have significant negative impacts on the airport.
After additional discussion ensued, the City Council requested staff to agendize the
French Valley Airport matter in order for the Council to explore the associated issues;
additionally requested that a School Board representative be present at that meeting to
R:\Minutes\071702
1
address questions of the Council, that copies of the School Board meeting minutes be
obtained and provided to Council (where citing schools in the French Valley area had
been discussed), and that annexation and the purchase of the airport be explored and
reported on.
CITY COUNCIL/COMMISSION BUSINESS
1 General Plan Goals and Policies
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Review the draft Goals and Policies Workbook and provide direction.
Deputy City Manager Thornhill noted the importance of the Goals and Policies component of the
General Plan.
Relaying the diligent efforts of the General Plan Community Advisory Committee and the
consultants as it relates to the General Plan update, Senior Planner Hogan introduced the
Committee Members who were present; and advised that it was staff's desire to obtain input
from the Planning Commission and the City Council with respect to the draft Goals and Policies
Workbook.
Via a PowerPoint presentation, Mr. Jeff Henderson with the aid of Mr. Brian Boeking,
consultants with Cotton/Bridges Associates, provided an overview of the following:
· A graphic outline of the General Plan Program.
· A summary of the Goals and Policies Workbook-
Noted that this draft document was the result of work completed by the General Plan
Community Advisory Committee in a series of eight meetings as well as extensive
review by City staff.
Requested direction from the City Council and the Planning Commission (primarily
focusing on the content of the data rather than typographical or grammatical errors
which could be addressed in written form) either at tonight's workshop or in written
form within a two-week period regarding the following issues:
Whether the goals and policies denoted were still relevant to the community
of Temecula;
Whether there were omissions i.e., areas that should be addressed in the
Goals and Policies which had not been; and
Clarified that it was not necessary that the City Council and the Planning
Commission reach a consensus regarding the issues at this time.
Defined and provided examples of the three primary components of the policies
expressed in the General Plan, as follows:
Goals,
Policies, and
implementation actions.
R:\Minutes\071702
2
Recommended that the Goals and Policies component of the General Plan be
consotidated in its final form in order to provide a more streamlined and clearer
document.
The Planninq Commission and the City Council commented on the Draft Goats and Policies
Workbook, as fo~lows:
With respect to the LAND USE ELEMENT, the following comments were relayed:
With respect to Goal I (regarding an integrated mix of uses), in Policy 1.5 (regarding
supporting the development of specified uses), Councilman Comemhero recommended that
biomedical uses be added, Mayor Pro Tem Stone additionally recommending that clean
manufacturing uses be added.
With respect to Policy 1.13 which stated Identify and preserve the necessary land to pursue a
community college, major college er university, Chairman Chiniaeff advised that to identify a
specific college may create an inverse condemnation issue, recommending that the language
state encourage the development, rather than identify.
With respect to Policy 1.14 (regarding greenbelts, etc.,) Councilman Comerchero
recommended that the word encourage be replaced with a stronger term, i.e., require, Mayor
Pro Tem Stone recommending that greenbelts in between the City and County boundaries as
well as within these boundaries be encouraged.
With respect to Goal 2 (regarding protected rural and historical areas), in Policy 2.2 (regarding
the rural development standards), Mr. Henderson clarified that this particular policy addressed
incentive provisions for maintaining the areas as rural, Senior Planner Hogan clarifying that the
General Plan Community Advisory Committee has more fully discussed rural preservation areas
which would be addressed with the Planning Commission and the City Council in an upcoming
workshop, noting that there was a proposal to investigate extending the planning area to the
east (i.e., to Anza Road) and to identify areas to remain rural.
With respect to Goal 3 (regarding land use patterns which enhance residential neighborhoods),
in Policy 3.3 which stated Protect single-family residential areas from encroachment by
commercial uses, Chairman Chiniaeff queried whether the emphasis was intended to be on
protection of single-family residential areas, advising that if commercial uses were located
adjacent to multi-family dwellings, more residents would be impacted. Councilman Comerchero
and Councilman Naggar noting the importance of protecting the single-family residences i.e.,
placing a buffer between business development and single-family residences.
With respect to Policy 3.4 (regarding review of residential development within the French Valley
Airport) Mayor Pro Tem Stone recommended that language be added to this policy point stating
the following: and implement policies to preserve the long-term integrity of this important
business asset.
In response to Mayor Pro Tem Stone's queries, Deputy City Manager Thornhill confirmed that it
was his understanding that when purchasing a home and/or land in the County proximate to the
French Valley Airport, the White Report (that disclosed information related to the airport and
was included in the escrow paperwork) was provided to property owners based on their
proximity to the airport.
R:\Minutes\071702
3
With respect to Goal 4 (regarding enhancing the environmental resources), in Policy 4.2
(regarding hillside development standards), Mayor Roberts relayed that in the first line there
was a typographical error, and that the word of should be deleted.
For Mayor Pro Tem Stone, Deputy City Manager Thornhill relayed that there was language
included in the Open Space component of the General Plan, which identified the escarpment of
the hills as an important resource, noting the potential to develop programs to put these
particular areas in Open Space.
For Mayor Roberts, Director of Public Works Hughes noted that while the City's Grading
Ordinance was near ready for circulation, this ordinance would not address the issue of property
owners disking for fire control.
In response to Mayor Roberts's concern regarding downstream impacts when property owners
were disking so significantly the impacts were similar to grading impacts, Deputy City Manager
Thornhill recommended that when the Grading Ordinance was presented to the City Council
that at that time the issues associated with grading be raised and addressed.
For Councilman Naggar, Deputy City Manager Thornhill noted that most of the areas in the City
were part of a Master Plan and have already been slated for mass grading; and relayed that the
City had hillside policies which addressed lot sizes and slopes, advising that at the next City
Council meeting Assistant Manager O'Grady would be presenting information regarding tools for
preserving Open Space.
With respect to Goal 5 (regarding development that encourages alternative modes of
transportation), in Policy 5.3 (regarding the design of sidewalks and trials) Mayor Roberts
offered commendation for adding the restriction prohibiting poisonous landscaping in the design
of sidewalks and trails.
Commissioner Mathewson noted that since this goal addressed alternate modes of
transportation, and Policy 5.6, 5.7, 5.9, and 5.10 addressed the benefits of the Mixed Use
Overlay concept, these policy points were not applicable to this goal, recommending that the
goal for developing Mixed Use Overlays be separated as a goal, in and of itself.
Concurring with Commissioner Mathewson, Councilman Comerchero relayed that the "Adaptive
Re-use Commercial Center" concept was a critical element, and was related to the preliminary
approval of the City's Housing Element; and noted the benefits if in five years' time this concept
is being implemented in the City.
Commenting on roadways in the City with striped bike lanes, a few of which are congested and
have only one lane for vehicular travel, Chairman Chiniaeff recommended that while there
should be a goal to implement bike lanes, there should also be consideration to have adequate
lanes of travel for vehicles.
In response to Mayor Roberts' recommendation to delete the word light from the phrase light rail
in Policy 5.8 (regarding implementation of trails and transit systems), Deputy City Manager
Thornhill advised that it may be prudent to develop a new policy addressing the development
and implementation of regional rail, noting that the policy point could include commuter, as well
as high speed rail, and Policy 5.8 could remain, as written, Mayor Roberts concurring with
Deputy City Manager Thornhill's suggestion. Councilman Comerchero recommended that in
Policy 5.8 although the language includes the term bus that it should also state including RTA
R:\Minutes\071702
4
in light of future RTA plans, and after additional discussion ensued it was the consensus to
include all forms of rail in this policy point.
In response to queries, Mr. Henderson confirmed that the Village Centers and Mixed Use
Overlay areas would be addressed separately.
With respect to Goal 6 (regarding a plan for Old Town Temecula), Mayor Pro Tem Stone
advised that he would be abstaining from discussion of this goal.
Councilman Comemhero recommended that with respect to the referenced mixed uses in Old
Town, that the language be more specific as to the particular type of mixed use being
encouraged.
Commissioner Olhasso recommended adding language that referenced Tourist Commercial
uses for Old Town.
Chairman Chiniaeff recommended that there be encouragement of uses that would attract
people downtown in the evening hours; and for Councilman Comerchero, specified that this
concept would include encouragement of the aggregation of land to create these types of uses.
Apprising the City Council and Planning Commission, Senior Planner Hogan clarified that the
Old Town Specific Plan more specifically addressed the specific goals discussed, noting that it
was the consensus of the City Council/Planning Commission a goal could be added to this
section of the General Plan that repeats the direction provided in the Specific Plan; and for
Mayor Roberts, advised that a copy of the Specific Plan could be provided to the City
Council/Planning Commission in order to explore whether there were major direction changes
recommended for this document.
Noting that he attended a recent Old Town Local Review Board meeting, Councilman Pratt
relayed that it had been his recommendation that the Board Members visit Leavenworth,
Washington which represented the concept he envisioned for Old Town; and advised that there
was a website for the City of Leavenworth where additional information could be obtained.
With respect to diversifying the types of uses in Old Town, Deputy City Manager Thornhill
relayed the discussions the Committee Members had had related to attracting additional
patronage; advised that the plans to develop the Theater Project, as well as the Children's
Museum in Old Town would aid in developing this area as a cultural center as well as a historic
area; and concurred that there should be a visioning process for Old Town.
Referencing the Keyser Marston study, Councilman Comerchero noted the primary
recommendation for Old Town had been to energize the population, noting the potential future
projects that were in the planning process and could accomplish this task, if approved.
With respect to Goal 7 (regarding annexation of unincorporated areas), Chairman Chiniaeff
recommended that Policy 7.3 include language that addressed consideration of annexation to
address preserving properties adjacent to City boundaries.
While noting that both Policy 7.6 (regarding impacts on the City from development on its
boundaries) and 7.7 (regarding developing strong working relationships with neighboring
jurisdictions) were important polices, Councilman Comerchero recommended that the language
be modified in order for the two policy points to not appear contradictory.
R:\Minutes\071702
5
It is noted that there were no recommendations with respect to Goal 8 (regarding coordinated
regional land use patterns.)
With respect to the CIRCULATION ELEMENT, the following comments were relayed:
With respect to Goal l(regarding striving to maintain certain Levels of Service), Councilman
Pratt noted his opposition to the word strive. In response, Deputy City Manager Thornhill noted
that to denote a stronger term such as "maintain" for a certain Service Level would not be
feasible due to the lack of control over the roadways that was a result of development occurring
outside the City boundaries.
Councilman Pratt opined that the "Level of Service" concept for mitigating traffic was ineffective.
For informational purposes, Mr. Henderson relayed that when Land Use and Circulation was
presented again a "Principal Intersection" concept would be brought forward.
For Councilman Comerchero, Director of Public Works Hughes noted that most cities in the
State, as well as in the nation recognized that in commuter periods there would be an
expectation that there would be a larger percentage of vehicles on the roads, clarifying that the
intent to operate at a LOS "D", or better, during peak hours, and an LOS "C", or better, during
non-peak hours (as referenced in Goal 1 as well as Policy 1.7) was an attempt to ensure that
intersections were not operating at a LOS "D" for eight to ten hours a day.
With respect to Goal 2 (regarding enhancement of traffic safety) regarding Policy 2.7 (regarding
establishing a ring route), Chairman Chiniaeff recommended that development of a continuous
route (i.e., a limited access route) from one end of the City to the other be thoroughly
investigated.
Councilman Pratt opined that improving transit routes for vehicles would not be a satisfactory
long-term solution.
With respect to Goal 3 (regarding a regional transportation system), discussion ensued
regarding specifically identifying the rights-of-way for future transit lines, as referenced in Policy
3.8, Senior Planner Hogan clarifying that the policy was providing direction for the future and not
referencing an accomplished task, Councilman Comerchero recommending that the following
language be added at the appropriate time after the word Identify in Policy 3.8.
With respect to Goal 4 (regarding an efficient City circulation system, in Policy 4.12 (regarding
the use of alternative fuel), Commissioner Mathewson recommended that this policy be
relocated to the section addressing Air Quality.
With respect to Goal $ (regarding parking), Commissioner Mathewson relayed his concern
regarding the joint use of parking facilities referenced in Policy 5.6, which could have negative
impacts if not addressed appropriately.
It is noted that there were no comments relayed with respect to Goal 6 (regarding alternatives to
motorized travel) or Goal 7 (regarding a truck circulation system).
R:\Minutes\071702
6
With respect to the OPEN SPACE/CONSERVATION ELEMENT, the following comments were
relayed:
Mayor Roberts recommended that there be consideration to create a policy of preserving the
few remaining oak trees in the City. In response, Deputy City Manager Thornhill confirmed that
there were few oak trees in the City, advising that typically during the environmental studies
these issues were identified and efforts were made to protect the oak trees at that time; and
advised that these policies could be strengthened, and/or an ordinance could be drafted for
follow-up of the issue.
Deputy City Manager Thornhill noted that in areas such as along the creek, there could be
consideration to plant native species of trees in order to ensure that the City would always have
oak trees, as well as other species if this was the desire of the City Council/Planning
Commission.
For Mayor Pro Tern Stone, Director of Community Services Parker advised that the existing
actual parkland in the City of Temecula was approximately 3.5 acres per thousand residents,
including the use of the two shared School District facilities.
In response to Mayor Pro Tem Stone's queries, City Attorney Thorson noted that the Quimby
requirements were directed by State Law and could not be increased by a local jurisdiction,
confirming, for Councilman Naggar, that with a Development Agreement additional
requirements could be negotiated.
Deputy City Manager Thornhill noted that when high densities were proposed in a development
plan, staff could discuss with the applicant the increase of Open Space areas which would be
for private use, and not public.
Mayor Pro Tem Stone recommended that language be added stating that in terms of negotiating
Development Agreements and various types of projects, the City desires to obtain/implement as
much parkland as feasible.
In response to Councilman Naggar, Councilman Comerchero advised that during the General
Plan Update Process the term "Open Space" would be more specifically defined.
With respect to Goal 2 (regarding conservation and protection of water), for Councilman
Naggar, Deputy City Manager Thornhill relayed that a policy could be developed requiring gas
stations to demonstrate that the contaminants on site could be contained and treated for
shipment off the property as per the standards of the Water Control Board; and confirmed that
this particular issue was addressed via alternate avenues, Mayor Roberts recommending that
this issue be explored and brought back.
It is noted that no comments were relayed with respect to Goal 3 (regarding protection of plant
and animal species), Goal 4 (regarding conservation of energy resources), Goal 5 (regarding
conservation of open space), and Goal 6 (regarding preservation of historical and cultural
resources).
With respect to Goal 7 which stated Protection of prime agricultural land from premature
conversion to urbanized uses, Councilman Comerchero recommended that the word premature
be deleted. In response to the ensuing discussion, Deputy City Manager Thornhill advised that
this particular goal would only be applicable if the City opted to annex property beyond the City
boundaries to the east.
R:\Minutes\071702
7
With respect to Policy 7.2 which states, Promote and preserve the Ioca/wine industry,
Councilman Comemhero recommended that the language be modified to state promote and aid
in preserving the local wine industry, Mayor Roberts suggesting that this policy would be
applicable under Economic Development. In response to additional discussion, Deputy City
Manager Thornhill advised that staff would work with Goal 7.
With respect to Goal 8 (regarding a trail system that serves both recreational and transportation
needs) under Policy 8.5, Councilman Comerchero noted that the phrase personal
transportation alternatives was an appropriate phrase.
With respect to Goal 9 (regarding protection of dark skies), it is noted that no comments were
relayed regarding this item.
Regarding the GROWTH MANAGEMENT/PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT, the following
comments were relayed:
With respect to Goal 1 (regarding management of growth), it is noted that no recommendations
were relayed.
With respect to Goal 2 (regarding patterns of growth), Chairman Chiniaeff noted the reference
to "Village Centers" in Policy 2.4.
Highlighting the phrase added to Policy 3.1 that states actual police service levels will be
evaluated annually, Councilman Comerchero recommended that similar language also be
included in Policy 3.2.
Councilman Pratt noted his opposition to the term strive which was utilized in Policy 3.1 and
3.2.
With respect to Goal 4 (regarding the school system), it is noted that no comments were
relayed.
With respect to Goal 5 (regarding public and quasi-public facilities), under Policy 5.4 (regarding
providing meeting space for non-profit groups), Councilman Comerchero recommended that the
language be revised to be more specific, noting his concern that the policy could be interpreted
in such a way as for all non-profit groups to feel entitled to meeting space provisions. In
response, Mr. Henderson suggested adding the phrase if feasible, Deputy City Manager
Thornhill suggesting the addition of the phrase explore opportunities, Councilman Comerchero
noting that either suggestion would be appropriate.
With respect to Goal 6 (regarding water and wastewater infrastructure system), Mayor Roberts
noted that he was pleased that Policy 6.7 addressed a brine line in the City.
It was noted that with respect to Goal 7 (regarding an effective, safe and environmentally
compatible flood control system), and Goal 8 (regarding waste management), no comments
were relayed.
With respect to Goal 9 (regarding electrical, natural gas, and telecommunication systems),
under Policy 9.3 (regarding installation of technological structures), Commissioner OIhasso,
echoed by Mayor Roberts and Mayor Pro Tern Stone, opined that the language was not strong
enough, advising that standards needed to be established. Councilman Naggar additionally
R:~Minutes\071702
8
noting that the installation of fiber optics will be an integral component in encouraging
individuals to work out of their homes, or for businesses to develop satellite offices. In response,
Mr. Henderson relayed that the language in this policy point would be strengthened.
With respect to the PUBLIC SAFETY ELEMENT, the following comments were made:
With respect to Goal 1, Policy 1.10 (regarding a Citywide Emergency Preparedness Plan), for
Councilman Comerchero and Mayor Roberts, Deputy City Manager Thornhill advised that even
though the City had an Emergency Preparedness Plan it was still prudent to have this element
included as a policy.
It is noted that no other recommendations were relayed regarding the Public Safety Element.
With respect to the NOISE ELEMENT, the following comments were relayed:
With respect to Goal 1 (regarding associated land use planning), it is noted that no
recommendations were relayed.
With respect to Goal 2 (regarding the control of noise between land uses), Chairman Chiniaeff
queried the definition of the term outdoor equipment that was referenced in Policy 2.2. Mr.
Henderson noted that further definition would be provided. Deputy City Manager Thornhill
clarifying that outdoor equipment referred to stationery outdoor equipment i.e., air conditioners,
and pool equipment; and advised that the newer developments located proximate to major
arterials had sound walls between the arterial and the residential area as referenced in Goal 3
and 4.
With respect to the AIR QUALITY ELEMENT, the following comments were relayed:
With respect to Mayor Pro Tem Stone's queries regarding solar energy panels, Deputy City
Manager Thornhill noted the significant higher costs for builders initially with implementation of
environmentally sensitive buildings and energy conserving elements; and suggested that there
be a general goal with policies encouraging the development of such building elements.
With respect to the COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT, the following comments were relayed:
For clarification, Deputy City Manager Thornhill relayed that in this segment of the General Plan
the updating of the Design Guidelines issues would most likely be addressed.
With respect to Policy 2.7 (regarding art in public and community places), Mayor Roberts
recommended that the phrase consider the establishment be replaced with the word Establish.
With respect to Goal 3 (regarding preservation and enhancement of individual districts or
neighborhoods), for Councilman Naggar, City Manager Nelson relayed that various funding
mechanisms are being explored for the development of additional Open Space, noting that
potentially funding could be identified to develop various slope areas within residential areas
(e.g. Margarita and Pauba Roads) related to preserving open space.
Councilman Comerchero recommended that an additional goal be added to this element
regarding City beautification, which could encompass assisting private landowners in
beautifying vacant property, and Old Town improvements, Mayor Pro Tem Stone suggesting
that the addition of entry statements in some of the older neighborhoods could be considered.
R:\Minutes\071702
9
Discussion ensued with respect to Goal 4 (regarding streetscapes).
For Mayor Pro Tem Stone, City Attorney Thorson relayed that the only Redevelopment funds
that could be utilized outside of the project area were for Iow and moderate-income housing.
Commissioner Olhasso advised that if homeowners were at a moderate income level, a
beautification program could be implemented on single-family privately-owned homes, that
covenants could be entered into, that the properly could be landscaped, and that if the property
owners do not maintain the landscaping the City could place a lien against the property and
maintain the area. City Manager Nelson noted the challenges regarding uniform maintenance of
these areas.
With respect to Goal 5 (regarding protection of significant natural features), under Policy 5.3
which states Establish a program to acquire, or permanently protect critical hillside areas from
development, Mayor Roberts relayed that he was pleased with the additional of this policy point.
It is noted that there were no recommendations with respect to Goal 6.
In response to Chairman Chiniaeff's queries associated with Goal 7 (regarding community
gathering areas), in Policy 7.8 and 7.9 (regarding public gathering spaces), Mr. Henderson
advised that these policy points could be consolidated.
With respect to the ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT, the following comments were
relayed:
In Goal 1, under Policy 1.5 (regarding attracting Federal and State agency offices), Councilman
Comerchero recommended that there be efforts expended specifically to attract as Federal out-
of-state office to the City of Temecula, Councilman Pratt suggesting that there be efforts to
attract a Federal home security office.
With respect to Goal 2 (regarding diversification of the economic base), Councilman
Comerchero and Mayor Pro Tem Stone confirmed that it was their desire to also add bio-
technical and high technical uses to Policy 2.1.
With respect to Goal 3 (regarding maintaining an economic base) it is noted that no
recommendations were relayed.
With respect to Goal 4 (regarding establishment of a diverse education, training and job
placement system), Commissioner Olhasso recommended that a policy point be added
referencing a K-12 or K-16 education in order to align course work and curriculum between high
school and college; advised that the issue of students who are not bound for college should be
addressed, that the ROP program should be encouraged, and that coursework in the high
school should be aligned with industrial needs; and noted that connectivity with the County of
Riverside and its training program would be vital, relaying that she would be willing to volunteer
to aid in setting up a work force strategy. In response, Mayor Pro Tem Stone noted that there
was a program designated for this particular function, advising that it should be revitalized.
Councilman Naggar suggested that in addition there be efforts to attract a regional occupation
center.
With respect to Goal 5 (regarding promoting the advantages of located in Temecula) in Policy
5.4, Commissioner Olhasso recommended that the language be revised to state support the
business retention program or words to that effect; advised that the Inland Empire Small
R:\Minutes\071702
10
Business Development Center (SBDC) office which supports small businesses should be
referenced in these policies; and noted that an entrepreneur network and entrepreneur training
programs could be developed via partnerships with Mt. San Jacinto College.
With respect to Policy 5.3 (regarding monitoring the ratio of the supply of housing verses the
supply of jobs), Mayor Roberts recommended deleting the word of.
In response to Commissioner Olhasso, Councilman Comerchero provided additional information
regarding the lack of a need and the lack of funding for a Convention and Visitor's Bureau at this
time per the Chamber of Commerce's investigation.
Mr. Henderson relayed that additional written comments were encouraged, and that written
remarks could be provided to Senior Planner Hogan any time within the next two weeks.
For Councilman Pratt, City Attorney Thorson confirmed that an update of a General Plan was
considered a project under CEQA, and that the consultant would also be preparing an EIR.
Councilman Naggar noted the importance of keeping this General Plan Update Project on tract;
and commended the General Plan Community Advisory Committee's efforts regarding this
project, Mayor Pro Tem Stone recommending that a banquet be scheduled in honor of this
committee's assiduous effods.
ADJOURNMENT
At 8:28 P.M., Mayor Roberts formally adjourned the Joint City Council/Planning Commission
Workshop to the next City Council regular meeting on TuesdayT July 23T 2002~ 7:00 P.M., City
Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
ATTEST:
Ron Roberts, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
R:\Minutes\071702
11
ITEM 3
RESOLUTION NO. 02-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS
SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND
ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A, on file in the
Office of the City Clerk, have been audited by the City Manager, and that the same are hereby
allowed in the amount of $2,357,015.86.
Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 27th day of August, 2002.
ATTEST:
Ron Roberts, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
R:/Resos2OO2/Resos 02- I
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do certify that the
foregoing Resolution No. 02- was duly aaopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the
City of Temecula on the 27th day of August, 2002 by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:.
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
R:/Resos2002/Resos 02- 2
CITY OF TEMECULA
LIST OF DEMANDS
08/08~)2 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
08/15/02 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
08/15/02 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN:
TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 08/27~)2 COUNCIL MEETING:
DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND:
1,201,767.53
306,035.12
$ 2,357r015.86
CHECKS;
001 GENERAL FUND
165 RDA DEV-LOW/MOD SET ASIDE
190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ. FUND
261 CFD 88-12 ADMIN EXPENSE FUND
280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY-ClP
300 INSURANCE FUND
310 VEHICLES FUND
320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS
330 SUPPORT SERVICES
340 FACILITIES
380 RDA - DEBT SERVICE
471 CFD 98-I ADMIN EXP
$ 1,327,970.21
166,502.93
40,908.93
21,025.76
489.84
261,275.83
68,438.60
26,599.81
67,437.00
30,446.98
14,073.22
12,403.94
1,250.00
1,375.00
$ 2,050,980,74
100 GENERAL FUND
185 RDA-LOW/MOD SET ASIDE
190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DIST R~CT
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D
280 REDEVELOPMENT AG ENCY-CIP
300 INSURANCE FUND
320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS
330 SUPPORT SERVICES
34o FAClLITtES
TOTAL BY FUND:
PREPARED DA YONKER, ACCO I OSPE LIST
SHAWN NELSON, CITY MANAGER
194,835.38
4,525.00
82,243.38
73.04
4,399.48
633,36
2,053.07
953.26
8,507.36
2,459.93
5,351.87
306,035.12
2,357,015.86
HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOW lNG IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOW lNG IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 1
08/15/2002 4:41:42PM City of Temecula
Check # Date
27 8/15/2002
28 8/15/2002
29 8/15/2002
78645 8/15/2002
78646 8/15/2002
78647 8/15/2002
78648 8/15/2002
78649 8/15/2002
Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA
Vendor Description
000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIREME Employees state retirement
78650 8/15/2002
78651 8/15/2002
78652 8/15/2002
78653 8/15/2002
78654 8/15/2002
78655 8/15/2002
78656 8/15/2002
78657 8/15/2002
78658 8/15/2002
78659 8/15/2002
78660 8/15/2002
78661 8/15/2002
78662 8/15/2002
000283 INSTATAX (iRS)
000444 INSTATAX (EDD)
Employees fed pr taxes
Employees fed pr taxes
000724 A & R CUSTOM SCREEN PRINTI Summer/Fall Softball Awards
005126 A E G SOLUTIONS
004973 ABACHERLI, LINDI
004938 Al COMPANY.COM
002877 ALTA LOMA CHARTER LINES
000936 AMERICAN RED CROSS
005266 ANDERSSON, ALISON
000101 APPLE ONE, INC.
004599 AQUARIUM OF THE PACIFIC
003203 ARTISTIC EMBROIDERY
CIP Division Auto CAD Paper supply
CIP Division Auto CAD Paper supply
TCSD instructor earnings
IPaq Individual Training &
Excursion bus svc: Sea Wodd
Excursion bus svc:lce-O-Plex
Excursion bus svc: San Diego Zoo
Staff certifications & Lifeguard
Refund: Sports Mini-Hawk
Acosta temp help PPE 07/27
Kissam temp help PPE 07/27
SMART Excursion Entrance Fees
Team pace resale inventory
Mrkt supplies:Summer Concert Series
Team pace resale inventory
Mrkt supplies:Summer Concert Series
002648 AUTO CLUB OF SOUTHERN CA Membership: Mapo Munoz 25868902
005267 BARNE3-r, BONNIE
002541 BECKER CONSTRUCTION SRV
002377 BEST BUY COMPANY INC
005273 BLAIR, CRAWFORD
005122 BLUES BROKERS BAND, THE
005269 BRADY, PENNY
005063 CELSOC
Refund: SMART-Castle Park
R & R Pedestrian Crossing Barricade
EE computer pumhase prgm
Refund:Sec. Deposit:6/30/02
Entertainment for Summer Concert Se
Refund: Music-Instant Piano
VARIOUS MANUALS FOR ~ CIP
Amount Paid
42,995.73
57,277.55
12,856.84
1,083.95
44.35
36.08
303.60
760.00
1,699.24
962.40
566.42
5.00
84.00
1,182.00
104.00
299.80
1,361.00
986.99
338.00
162.50
44.66
9.00
1,825.00
1,653.88
100.00
800.00
20.00
126.26
Check Total
42,995.73
57,277.55
12,856.84
1,063.95
80.43
303.60
760.00
3,228.06
5.00
84.66
1,286.00
299.80
2,848.49
44.00
9.00
1,825.00
1,653.88
100.00
800.00
20.00
126.26
Page:l
apChkLst Page: 2
08/15/2602 4:41:42PM
Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA
Check # Date Vendor
78663 8/15/2002
78664 8/18/2002
78665 8/15~002
78666 8/15/2002
78667 8/15/2002
003214 CAL MAT
003214 CAL MAT
004228 CAMERON WELDING SUPPLY
004093 CARDIO CARE PLUS
000131 CARL WARREN & COMPANY I
78668 8/15/2002 002415 CASTLE AMUSEMENT PARK
78669 6/15/2002
78670 8/15/2002
78671 8/15/2002
78672 8/15/2002
78673 8/15/2002
78674 8/15/2002
78675 8/15/2002
78676 8/15/2002
78677 8/15/2002
78678 8/15/2002
78679 8/15/2002
78680 8/15/2002
78681 8/15/2002
78682 8/15/2002
Final Check List
City of Temecula
(Continued)
Description
PW patch truck materials
PW patch truck materials
Helium tanks refill:TCSD
TCSD instructor earnings
Claim adjuster services
Claim adjuster services
Smart Excursion Entrance Fees
001249 CENTRE FOR ORG EFFECTIVE Sem:Protocal Series:Meyers:5/30
001555 CHRISTOPHERSON FIRE PROT CRC kitchen fire sprinklers mntc
004405 COMMUNITY HEALTH CHARI Employees Charities contributions
002147 COMPLIMENTS COMPLAINTS & Entertainment: Summer concert Serie
Entertainment: Summer Nights Pgrrn
Amount Paid
923.88
213.85
25.70
550.40
2,905.05
614.75
649.47
249.00
77.93
141.50
500.00
250.00
002945 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL
002631 COUNTS UNLIMITED INC
004571 CUNNINGHAM DAVIS CORP
005216 DEGAETANO, MONTSERRAT
002701 DIVERSIFIED RISK
004769 DRAGONFLYER PRESS
005264 DROTMAN, MIKE
001669 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATt
Old twn area elect supplies
Citywide trff count data collection
Release retention for prjt PW01-01
Refund: Gymnastics- Tumblers
special events premiums
Ad in So CA Inland Empire Visitor
Refund: Summer Day Camp
Supplies for graffiti removal
645.42
3,530.00
7,907.29
23.00
1,043.30
1,500.00
90.66
63.66
001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVICES Ebon temp help PPE 07/12
Montecino temp help PPE 07/26
Rosales temp help PPE 07/12
Obmann temp help PPE 07/26
Rcsales temp help PPE 07/26
Obmann temp help PPE 07/12
CAMMAROTA TEMP HELP PPE 07
002390 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER Aug 95366-02 Diego Dr Meter svcs
2,196.80
2,196.80
1,905.60
1,850.72
1,762.40
1,700.08
57.24
443.28
Check Total
923.88
213.85
25.70
550.40
3,519.80
649.47
249.00
77.93
141.50
750.00
645.42
3,530.00
7,907.29
23.00
1,043.30
1,500.00
90.60
63.58
11,669.64
443.28
Page2
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 3
08/15/2002 4:41:42PM City of Temecula
Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA
Check # Date Vendor
78683 8/15/2002
78684 8/15/2002
78685 8/15/2002
78686 8/15/2002
78687 8/15/2002
78688 8/15/2002
78689 8/15/2002
78690 8/15/2002
78691 8/15/2002
78692 8/15/2002
78693 8/15/2002
78694 8/15/2002
78695 8/15/2002
78696 8/15/2002
78697 8/15/2002
78698 8/15/2002
78699 8/15/2002
78700 8/15/2002
78701 8/15/2002
005263 ECKERT, LINDA
005052 EMCOR SERVICE
003171 EMPIRE ECONOMICS LLC
78702 8/15/2002
78703 8/15/2002
002037 EXPANETS
000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC
001135 FIRST CARE INDUSTRIAL MED
(Continued)
Description
Refund: Arts/Crafts-Cartooning
HVAC repairs @ Fire Stn 84
Supp Mrkt Study Wolf Creek CFD
Misc Repair/Maint of telephone Equip
Express mail services
Pre-employment physicals
000711 GRAPHICS UNLIMITED LITHOG TRI FOLD CONCERT SERIES
Artwork for Concert Series Postern
000520 H D L COREN & CONE INC -
002372 HARMON, JUDY
CAFR statistical section pkg
TCSD instructor earnings
000194 I C M A RETIREMENT TRUST 45 Retirement contributions
005268 IACOBONI, SUE Refund: Dance-Youth Hawaiian Beg
004833 IMPERIAL PAVING COMPANY I A..C. Repairs required for Flood
601517 INTEGRATED INSIGHTS DBA: H Sem:Managing:Keith:7/18
Employee Assistance Program
000388 INTL CONFERENCE BLDG Uniform building code books
Uniform building code books
003266 IRON MOUNTAIN OFFSITE Records mgmt microfilm storage unit
001186 IRWIN, JOHN TCSD instructor earnings
002140 JAGUAR COMPUTER SYSTEMS GWAVA Standard Edition - MTA Li
Network equipment mntc/repairs
005265 JAHANSOUZ, FARKHONDEH Refund: Level 4/5 Swim Lessons
003046 K F R O G 95.1 FM RADIO
005271 KARMA, VIVIAN
002424 KELLEY DISPLAY INC
Broadcasting for Summer Nights
Broadcasting for Summer Nights
Broadcasting for Summer Nights
Refund: Dance-Ballroom
Custom american Flag banners
Amount Paid
30.00
154.36
4,856.25
476.00
56.02
218.00
832.91
75.43
250.00
603.76
5,924.64
30.00
9,805.00
800.00
570.57
1,348.10
320.02
158.75
288.00
3,996.45
1,987.63
25.00
700.00
500.00
426.00
12.00
9,330.30
Check Total
30.00
154.36
4,856.25
476.00
56.02
218.00
908.34
250.00
603.76
5,924.64
30.00
9,805.00
1,370.57
1,668.12
158.75
288.00
5,984.08
25.00
1,626.00
12.00
9,330.30
Page3
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 4
08/15/2002 4:41:42PM City of Temecula
Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA
(Continued)
Check # Date Vendor
78704 8/15/2002
78705
78706 8/15/2002
000206 KINKOS INC
004499 LESLIES POOL SUPPLY
Description
Stationery paper/misc supplies
Stationery paper/misc supplies
Stationery paper/misc supplies
Aquatics supplies
Aquatics supplies
Aquatics supplies
Aquatics supplies
Aquatics supplies
Amount Paid
004135 LOGIC COMPUTER PRODUCTS DLT4 Backup Tape
155.16
82.97
10.95
1,025.74
613.64
138.16
83.79
15.32
1,431.01
78707 8/15/2002
78708 8/15/2002
003782 MAIN STREETSIGNS
004068 MANALILI, AILEEN
Various Street Signs for PW Maint
Various Street Signs for PW Maint
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
1,093.66
859.85
546.00
78709 5/15/2002 005260 MANALO, ANDRES
Refund: Tennis-Beg./Inter. Jr.
95.00
474.10
20.00
345.60
3,439.39
2,000.00
777.95
68.00
3,200.00
78710 8/15/2002 004929 MARK FISHER COMPANY, THE Design ad - Where Magazine O. C. &
78711 8/15/2002 005259 MARKS, PAMELA
Refund: Safety Town - Session I
78712 8/15/2002 002693 MATROS, ANDREA
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
78713 8/15/2002 000944 MCCAIN TRAFFIC SUPPLYINC Right-Turn Permissive
78714 5/15/2002 003448 MELODYSADWORKS
Hot Summer Nights Campaign Servic
78715 8/15/2002 001892 MOBILE MODULAR
8/3-9/2/02 Modular Rentai:Stn 92
78716 8/15/2002 005261 MONTEFORTE, ANTHONY Refund: Dog Obediance
78717 8/15/2002 000883 MONTELEONE EXCAVATING Backfill ShouldersJClean Streets-
78718 8/15/2002
78719 8/15/2002
78720 8/15/2002
78721 8/15/2002
78722 8/15/2002
002925 NAPAAUTO PARTS
002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE
002668 OMEGA LAKE SERVICES
Misc Parts & Supplies for PW Maint
Misc Parts/Supplies:Paramedic Vehic
City vehicle maintJrepair svcs
City vehicle maint/repair svcs
Jul Duck Pond water maintenance svc
Aug Duck Pond water maintenance s
001171 ORIENTALTRADINGCOMPANY Holiday ltems for Breakfast w/Santa
Misc. Holiday Items & 9/11 Event Ire
002255 P & D CONSULTANTS INC Jul Temp Help Bldg Inspectors
48.63
9.53
90.03
25.11
800.00
800.00
516.99
113.28
15,196.30
66.75
78723 8/15/2002 004074 PARTY CITY OF TEMECULA IN Recreation Supplies - Family Fun Nig
Check Total
249.08
1,876.65
1,431.01
1,953.51
546.00
95.00
474.10
20.00
345.60
3,439.39
2,000.00
777.95
68.00
3,200.00
58.16
115.14
1,600.00
630.27
15,196.30
66.75
PageA
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 5
08/15/2002 4:41:42PM City of Temecula
Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA
Check # Date Vendor
78724 8/15/2002 003218 PELA
78725 8/15/2002
78726 8/15/2002
78727 8/15/2002
78728 8/15/2002
78729 8/15~002
78730
78731 8/15/2002
78732 8/15/2002
78733 8/15/2002
78734 8/15/2002
78735 8/15/2002
78736 8/15/2002
78737 8/15~002
78738 8/15/2002
78739 8/15/2002
(Continued)
Description
Jul TCSD Idscp plan check svcs
005257 PENA, KIRSTEN Refund: Sci Adv Camp-Far Out Phys
001958 PERS LONG TERM CARE PROG Employee benefits
000249 P~:I IYCASH Pettycash reimbursement
000580 PHOTO WORKS OF TEMECULA Jul Film/Photo Development Svcs
004204 POGAN, MARK
004457 R J NOBLE COMPANY
Entertainment:Summer Concert
Release Retantion:Marg Rd Imprv:PW
004572 R MOODY CONSTRUCTION INC Release retention:MPSC
000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST
004483 RECREONICS INC
004584 REGENCY LIGHTING
002907 REINHART FONTES
000266 RIGHTWAY
000418 RIVERSIDE CO CLERK &
Various water metem
Various water meters
Jul 01-02-98010-0 Stn 84
Aug 01-08-38009-0 Stn 92
Jul 01-09-84860-5 Pujol St
Jul 01-02-98000-0 Stn 84
31" Pace Clock w/Stand:Aquatic Prgm
various parks elect, supplies (HPS 50
Various Parks Electrial Supplies
Industrial land appraisal services
Rental equipment:Long Cyn Creek Pa
Jul 02 Aperture card duplicates
000955 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFF SW ST July 4th Parade/Fireworks Patrol Svcs
Credit:Over billed inv# 99327
000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS DEP 05/30-06/30/02:1aw enforcement
78740 8/15/2002 001097 ROADLINE PRODUCTS INC
78741 8/15/2002 002228 RUSSO, MARYANNE
78742 8/15/2002 004528 SAN DIEGO BANJO BAND
78743 8/15/2002 005121 SAN DIEGO MUSEUM OF MAN SMART Excursion Program:7/17/02
78744 8/15/2002 005120 SAN DIEGO NATURAL HISTOR SMART Prgm Excursion:07/17/02
Amount Paid Check Total
10,060.00 10,060.00
83.60 83.60
136.61 136.61
400.55 400.55
114.87 114.87
700.00 700.00
134,504.57 134,504.57
Misc Parts/Supplies for PW Patch Tru
TCSD Instructor Earnings
Entartainment:Hot Summer Nights:5/
55,874.30 55,874.30
36,187.05
3,904.06
458.56
122.94
56.17
12.52 40,741.30
350.06 350.06
1,510.55
723.1~ 2,233.66
3,500.00 3,500.00
163.53 163.53
38.20 38.20
12,684.25
-5,659.20 7,025.05
576,543.06 576,543.06
48.27 48.27
546.00 546.00
350.00 350.00
85.00 85.00
148.00 148.00
Page5
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 6
08/15/2002 4:41:42PM City of Temecula
Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA
Check # Date Vendor
78745 8/15/2002
78746 8/15/2002
78747 8/15/2002
005252 SAPUTO, NANCY
005258 SCHURICHT, KRISTI
000385 SHELDON EXTINGUISHER COM
78748 8/15/2002
78749 8/15/2002
78750 8/15/2002
78751 8/15/2002
005256 SIMMS, TAMARA
003804 SKYHAWKS SPORTS ACADEM
000645 SMART & FINAL INC
000537 SO CALIF EDISON
78752 8/15/2002
78753 8/15/2002
78754 8/15/2002
78755 8/15/2002
78756 8/15/2002
001212 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY
000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST
000293 STADIUM PIZZA
005253 STOLTE, SHAYNA
000574 SUPERTONER
78757 8/15/2002 004581 SWING SHIFT
78758 8/15/2002 005262 TEAGUE, MICHELLE
(Continued)
Description
Refund:SMART-Castle Park
Refund: Toddler Swim Lessons
WESTWING FIRE EXTINGUISHER I
TCC FIRE EXTINGUISHER INSPECT
Fire extinguisher maint svcs:C.M.
PARKS FiRE EXTINGUISHER INSP
CRC fire extinguisher inspection svcs
City Hall fire extinguisher inspection
MUSEUM FIRE EXTINGUISHER IN
SR CTR FIRE EXTINGUISHER INSP
Refund: Safety Town - Session I
TCSD instructor earnings
Recreation Supplies - Teen Program
Recreation Supplies - Family Fun Nig
Aug 2-01-202-7330 Various Street La
Aug 2-01-202-7603 Various Street La
Aug 2-00-987-0775 Vail Ranch
Jul 2-05-791-8807 various meters
Aug 2-10-331-1353 Stn 84
Aug 2-06-105-0654 various meters
Aug 2-23-693-2810 Pala Rd
Aug 2-23-548-1975 various meters
Aug 095-167-7907-2 Stn 84
Aug 021-725-0775-4 Sr Ctr
Aug 181-383-8881-6 Museum
City Hall Pest Control Services
Sr Ctr Pest Control Services
REFRESHMENTS:ALCOHOL LIC. SE
Refreshments:SMART Prgm
Refund; level 3 swim lessons
HP Printer Supplies
Aug HP Printer Maintenance Service
Jul HP Printer Maintenance Service
HP Printer Supplies
HP Printer Supplies
HP Printer Supplies
HP Printer Supplies
Concert Series Entertainment:8/01/02
Refund: Back to the Beach
Amount Paid
28.00
22.00
30.00
22.50
7.50
176.88
· 105.00
75.00
45.00
45.00
20.00
1,504.80
86.47
25.62
35,695.76
13,766.90
5,146.28
3,557.48
2,771.61
2,483.88
84.20
30.26
94.06
50.10
11.43
56.00
29.00
63.01
23.87
30.00
1,491.26
828.32
828.32
439.62
400.81
302.78
98.91
1,500.00
6.00
Check Total
28.00
22.00
506.88
20.00
1,504.80
112.09
63,536.37
155.59
85.00
86.88
30.00
4,390.02
1,500.00
6.00
Page~
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 7
08/18/2002 4:41:42PM City of Temecula
Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued)
Check # Date Vendor Description
78759 8/15/2002 003673 TECH 101 ARCUS INC
Amount Paid
Misc Computer Supplies
192.33
216.00
78760 8/15~002 005274 TELESIO, JOHN
Reimb:Planner's Institute:8/20-21/02
78761 8/15/2002
78762 8/15/2002
000309 TEMECULA COPIERS
000168 TEMECULA FLOWER CORRAL
Jul copier usage expenses:b/w copies
Fax machine for City Clerk's dept.
Sunshine Fund/TCSD event/Council
3,118.21
2,056.95
205.64
78763 8/15/2002 004209 TEMECULA SUNRISE ROTARY SafetyTown Payments
100.00
78764 8/15/2002 000306 TEMECULA VALLEY PIPE & SU Parks irrigation/maintenance supplies
83.55
78765 8/15/2002
78766 8/15/2002
78767 8/15/2002
003140 TEMECULAVALLEYTAEKWON TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
TCSD Instructor Earnings
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
TCSD instructor Earnings
003862 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR. Jul City Hall elevator inspection svcs
Aug City Hall elevator inspection svcs
000320 TOWNE CENTER STATIONERS Office Supplies for CIP Div
187.20
100.00
100.00
93.60
62.40
60.00
40.00
20.00
20.00
300.00
300.00
72.10
78768 8/15/2002 005254 TULIMERO, CARMELLA
Refund: picnic shelter - 5/19/02
30.00
78769 8/15/2002
78770 8/15/2002
004895 TUMBLES, J.W.
001065 U S C M WEST (DEF COMP)
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
TCSD Instructor Earnings
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
Employee def comp plan
259.20
172.80
115.20
79.20
72.00
43.20
38.40
16,336.41
78771 8/15/2002 000389 U S C M WEST (OBRA)
P/T ee retirement pmt
5,104.92
3,832.13
255.80
30.00
12,956.00
78772 8/15/2002 002702 U S POSTALSERVICE
78773 8/15/2002 000325 L~NITEDWAY
Postage meter deposit
Employee contributions
78774 8/15/2002 004504 VAIL RANCH SELF STORAGE Aug Off Site Storage for Records Mgm
78775 8/15/2002 004368 VAt COOPER & ASSOCIATES I Jun Temp Help Land Dev. Inspection
Check Total
192.33
216.00
5,175.16
205.64
100.00
83.55
683.20
600.00
72.10
30.00
780.00
16,336.41
5,104.92
3,832.13
255.80
30.00
12,956.00
Paget
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 8
08/15/2002 4:41:42PM City of Temecula
Bank: onion UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA
Check # Date Vendor
78776 8/15/2002 004261 VERIZON CALIFORNIA
78777 8/15/2002
78778 8/15/2002
78779 8/15/2002
78780 8/15/2002
78781 8/15/2002
78782 8/15/2002
78783 8/15/2002
004279 VERIZON CALIFORNIA INC.
004789 VERIZON INTERNET SOLUTION
003730 WEST COAST ARBORiSTS INC
004595 WESTERN MUSEUMS ASSOCI
002109 WHITE CAP INDUSTRIES INC
004829 WILSON GROUP LLC, THE
005255 WINGATE, DENISE
(Continued)
Description
Amount Paid
AUG XXX-1941 GENERAL USAGE
Jul xxx-5840 general usage
Jul xxx-5780 general usage
JUL XXX-2670 911 AUTO DIALER
Jul access-CRC phone line
Jul access-rvsd co phone line
Aug Phone svcs/EOC backup @ stn 8
58.82
33.13
33.13
28.69
343.30
268.20
69.95
Citywide Tree Maintenance Svcs
1,831.50
9/01/02-8/31/03 membership:#4146.00
125.00
Misc suppiles for PW Maint
26.58
Jul State Legislative Lobbyist &
Aug State Legislative Lobbyist &
Refund: CPR & First Aid Training
Check Total
153.77
611.50
69.95
1,831.50
125.00
26.58
3,500.00
3,500.00 7,000.00
43.00 43.00
Sub total for UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA: 1,201,767.53
Page~
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 9
08/1512002 4:41:42PM City of Temecula
142 checks in this report.
Grand Total All Checks:
1,201,767.53
Page~
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 1
08/09/2002 11:18:22AM City of Temecula
Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA
Check # Date Vendor
78448 8/8/2002
78449 8/8/2002
78450 8/8/2002
78451 8/8/2002
78452 8/8/2002
78453 8/8/2002
78454 8/8/2002
78455 8/8/2002
78456 8/8/2002
005226 2002 CCPOA CONFERENCE, ST
000724 A & R CUSTOM SCREEN PRINTI
000434 ACCELA. COM
005222 ADVERSALO, TERI
004938 Al COMPANY.COM
005246 ALAMERI, SUZANNE
002733 ALBAO, NANCY
001916 ALBERT A WEBB ASSOCIATES
002877 ALTA LOMA CHARTER LINES
78457 8/8/2002 003954 ALTERNATIVE FIRE PROTECTI
78458 8/8/2002 004022 AMERICAN MINI STORAGE, TE
78459 8/8/2002 000936 AMERICAN RED CROSS
78460 8/8/2002 000101 APPLE ONE, INC.
78461 8/8/2002 004599 AQUARIUM OF THE PACIFIC
78462 8/8/2002 001323 ARROWHEADWATER INC
Description Amount Paid Check Total
Crime Prevention Conf:9/25-27 195.00 195.00
T-shirts for 4th of July 928.25 928.25
Modifications to Accela scantmn
Refund: Security Deposit
IPaq Individual Training &
Refund: Level 3 Swim Lessons
TCSD instructor earnings
1,320.00 1,320.00
100.00 100.00
855.00 855.00
25.00 25.00
160.00 160.00
Special tax consultant:Harveston CFD 30,000.00
Sales tax consulting svos: CFD 98-1 1,375.00 31,375.00
Excursion bus svcs: Balboa Park 566.42
Excursion bus svc: Lg Beach 392.98
Excursion bus svc:Mulligan's Fun Cen 380.96
Excursion bus svcs: Movie Exp. 320.80
Excursion bus svc:Skate City 320.80 1,981.96
Install fire sprinkler sys @ Country 3,528.00
Retention for Invoice 39132 -596.25 2,931.75
Jul 02-June 03 storage unit B109 1,595.00
Jul 02-June 03 storage unit C115 1,595.00
Jul 02-June 03 storage unit F105 1,430.00
Jul 02-June 03 storage unit B111 1,170.00 5,790.00
Staff certifications for Jr. L~feguard 30.00 30.00
Arreola temp help PPE 06/29
Acosta temp help PPE 07/20
Cates temp help PPE 06/08
Arreola temp help PPE 06/22
Arreola tamp help PPE 06/15
Kau tamp help PPE 06/22
Kau temp help ppe 06/15/02
Kau temp help PPE 06/29
Thompson temp help PPE 06/22
SMART Excursion Entrance Fees
Bottled wtr servs @ City Hall
Bottled wtr servs for SMART prgm
Bottled wtr servs @ Mntc Fac
Bottled wtr servs @ CRC
Bottled wtr servs @ Museum
1,196.00
1,160.55
914.55
696.80
535.60
529.75
520.00
399.75
71.50 6,024.50
89.15 89.15
1,009.82
266.39
248.46
87.47
42.23 1,654.37
Page:l
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 2
08/09/2002 11:18:22AM City of Temecula
Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA
Check# Date
78463 8/8/2002
78464 8/8/2002
78465 8/8/2002
78466 8/8/2002
78467 8/8/2002
78468 8/8/2002
78469 8/8/2002
78470 8/8/2002
78471 8/8/2002
78472 8/8/2002
78473 8/8/2002
78474 8/8/2002
78475 8/8/2002
78476 8/8/2002
78477 8/8/2002
78478 8/8/2002
78479 8/8/2002
7848O 8/8/2002
78481 8/8/2002
78482 8/8/2002
78483 8/8/2002
78484 8/8/2002
Vendor
003203 ARTISTIC EMBROIDERY
(Continued)
Description
Planning staff shirts
002648 AUTO CLUB OF SOUTHERN CA Membemhip:Nelson 25799883
Membership: Mike Austin 72361355
003814 BALLREICH, MICHAELA
005225 BEACHAM, WENDELL
Reimb:Muni Clerk Conf:7/14-19
Refund: Security Deposit
002541 BECKER CONSTRUCTION SRV Repair Barrels in Old Town
005210 BEGEY, LISA
005221 BESANCON, ROSEMARY
004860 BKM TOTAL OFFICE OF CALIF
003817 BLUE RIDGE MEDICAL
005203 BURKE, LISA
002878 BUSINESS INFORMATION
002208 BUSINESS PRESS, THE
Refund: Gymnastics-Cheerleaders
Refund: Security Deposit
Repair recliners & Stn 84
Paramedic squad supplies:Fire
Refund: Lever 2 Swim Lessons
City EE computer training svcs
Newspaper subscription City Mgrs Of
004248 CALIF DEPT OF JUSTICE/ACCT June blood alcohol analysis
New employees fingerprint apps
Credit: Wrong agency billed
005224 CALIF PIRETrES GOLD 16 & U, Refund: Security DeposR
002534 CATERERS CAFE
005223 CHEMICON INTERNATIONALI
000912 CITY CLERKS ASSN OF CALIF
005218 COMBE, ROCHELLE
001193 COMP U S A INC
005212 CORONA, AMBERLY
003739 COTTON BELAND ASSOCIATE
002900 DANIEL MANN JOHNSON
Refreshments:Closed Door Mtg
Refund: Security Deposit
Nuts & Bolts Sem:Brea:09/19-20
Refund: Toddler Swim Lessons
Misc Computer supplies
Refund: Sci Adv Camp-Wings Flying
Consultant for update housing elemen
Consultant to update housing element
Design svcs:Pala Rd lmpr Phase II
Pmf svcs:Pala Rd Impr-Phase II
Credit:chrg for prjt mgr not part of
Amount Paid Check Total
91.59 91.59
44.00
44.00 88.00
438.79 436.79
100.00 100.00
2,850.00 2,850.00
14.00 14.00
100.00 100.00
375.62 375.62
987.80 987.80
25.00 25.00
2,190.00 2,190.00
59.00 59.00
525.00
336.00
-35.00 826.00
100.00 100.00
41.87 41.87
100.00 100.00
200.00 200.00
25.00 25.00
99.53 99.53
139.00 139.00
750.00
657.50 1,407.50
28,134.70
13,493.55
-315.98 41,311.27
Page2
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 3
08/09/2002 11:18:22AM City of Temecula
Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA
(Continued)
Check # Date Vendor
78485 8/8/2002
78486 8/8/2002
78487 8/8/2002
001393 DATA TICKET INC
005216 DEGAETANO, MONTSERRAT
005235 DEVENCENZI, KELISSA
Description
June citations processing
June citations processing
Refund: Gymnastics- Tumblers
Refund: Level 1 Swim Lessons
Refund: Dance-Youth Hawaiian Inter
78488 8/8/2002
78489 8/8/2002
004192 DOWNS COMMERCIAL FUELI
005151 DUNN & BRADSHEET
Fuel for city vehicles: TCSD
Fuel for city vehicles:Planning
Fuel for city vehicles: PW
Fuel for city vehicles: Eng
Fuel for city vehicles: Bldg & Safety
Fuel for city vehicles: PW
DDWW/Exprass Investigation Svcs
78490 8/8/2002 005217 DURISH, JULIE
Refund: Toddler Swim Lessons
78491 8/8/2002
78492 8/6/2002
001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVICES Mccoy temp help PPE 06/28
Rosales temp help PPE 06/28
TEMP HELP - OFC ASST & SLDG IN
Bragg tamp help PPE 07/26
Obmann temp help PPE 06/28
Rosa temp help PPE 07/26
TEMP HELP - OFC ASST & SLDG IN
Martinez temp help PPE 07/26
SALARY FOR SUSAN CAMMAROTA,
003223 EDAW INC Environmental consulting Long Canyo
78493 8/6/2002
78494 8/8/2002
000161 EDEN SYSTEMS INC
005205 EDISEN, MICHELE
Inforum gold upgrade: Expense Reimb
Inforum gold upgrade: Data Conversio
Inforum gold upgrade: Prjt Mgmt
Refund: Art- Creative Drawing
78495 8/6/2002 002283 EMBASSY SUITES HOTEL HtI:CSOII Fanene:9/25-27:Crime
78496 6/6/2002 005204 EMME"Cr, THERESE
Refund: Level 3 Swim Lessons
78497 8/8/2002 005214 ETHERIDGE, KELLY
Refund: Summer Day Camp
Amount Paid Check Total
683.31
140.00 823.31
31.00
19.00 50.00
30.00 30,00
949.07
378.59
355.05
198.94
170.39
34.52 2,086.56
111.00 111.00
25.00 25.00
2,656.09
1,861.54
1,829.12
1,726.20
1,721.60
1,148.00
1,092.98
1,058.40
729.81 13,823.74
1,204.66 1,204.66
1,154.43
1,125.00
468.75 2,748.18
67.00 67.00
467.25 467.25
25.00 25.00
80.00 80.00
78498 6/8/2002 002060 EUROPEAN DELI & CATERING Refreshments:Council Mtg 163.78
Refreshments:Welty Bldg Task Mtg 67.51 231.29
Page3
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 4
08/09/2002 11:18:22AM City of Temecula
Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA
(Continued)
Check # Date Vendor
78499 8/8/2002
78500 8/8/2002
001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE
000478 FAST SIGNS
Description
Amount Paid
Check Total
June Idscp impr:Field Prep
June Idscp impr:Saddlewood
June Idscp impr:Temeku Hills
June Idscp [rapt:Winchester Creek
June Idscp impr: Campos Verdes
May Idscp impr:Vail Ranch Prkwy
June Idscp impr: Rustic Glen Dr
May Idscp impr: Rustic Glen
May Idscp impr:Diego Joes
June Idscp impr:Corte Catsnia
White blank magnetic sign 24" X 24"
1,120.00
401.00
269.34
175.00
150.00
143.89
141.10
130.64
113.53
55.25
150.85
2,699.75
150.85
78501 8/8/2002
78502 8/8/2002
78503 8/8/2002
000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC Express mail services
Express mail services
Express mail services
Express mail services
003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER xx-7824 Comemhero:Conf
xx-1143 Parker:C Museum/Mtgs
xx-6165 Yates:EE Recogn/United Way
xxx-9277 R Roberts:Sister Cities/Conf
xxx-9277 R Roberts:Tern Flwr/'rem Cr
xx-9798 Stone:League of Citiess/KDR
xx-2292 G Roberts:Prf Mtg/Publication
xx-1405 Ubnoske:Prof Mtg P.C.
001135 FIRST CARE INDUSTRIAL MED Pre-employment physicals
263.37
232.82
164.37
78.11
1,533.48
721.36
512.48
443.50
425.90
282.04
134.73
43.28
400.00
738.67
4,096.77
400.00
78504 8/8/2002 001989 FOX NETWORK SYSTEMS INC Audio~,idoo supplies: Council
112.07
112.07
78505 8/8/2002 000795 FREDPRYORSEMINARS/CARE First-timeSupervisor:7/11/Harris
149.00
149.00
78506 8/8/2002 004886 FREEDOM SCREENPRINTING Uniforms for Fire Explorers post 204
2,845.23
2,845.23
78507 8/8/2002
004178 FREEDOM ~IGNS
78508 8/8/2002 003531 GATEWAy
Balloon & Wine Festival banner
Mount 7 posters to foam boards
Credit:DA Support notice
EE computer purchase prgm:Lanier
107.75
75.25
-25.00
1,723.90
158.00
1,723.90
78509 8/8/2002
78510 8/8/2002
000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCTS Office Supplies: Fire Dept
Office Supplies: Finance
Office Supplies: BIdg & Safety
Office Supplies: City Mgr
Office Supplies: Human Resource
Office supplies: Police
003792 GRAINGER Safety cabinets for Stn 84
Safety cabinets for Stn 84
1,602.57
505.45
226.43
125.70
92.07
59.22
718.58
713.95
2,611.44
1,432.53
Page~
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 5
08/09/2002 11:18:22AM City of Temecula
Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA
(Continued)
Check# Date Vendor .Description
78511 8/8/2002 004969 GRANDSTAND CARDS
Amount Paid
Check Total
Trading cards:CSO Corriea & her hem
157.35
157.35
78512 8/8/2002
78513 8/8/2002
000711 GRAPHICS UNLIMITED LITHOG Add't chrgs for recreation book
Create aquatic logo
Film output for T-shirts on SMART log
003640 GRAYNER ENGINEERING Engineer svcs:Childs Museum
1,930.64
635.73
119.60
2,000.00
2,685.97
2,000.00
78514 8/8/2002 005211 GROEN~GER, GAYLE
Refund: Skyhwk Tennis Camp
84.00
84.00
78515 8/8/2002
78516 8/8/2002
002174 GROUP 1 PRODUCTIONS
005220 GUTTIREZ, DANIELLE
Helen Putnam award video pmductio
State of the City Video Production
Refund: Security Deposit .
600.00
100.00
100.00
700.00
100.00
78517 8/8/2002 005209 GUZON, SUSAN
Refund: Sports-Beginning Golf
89.00
89.00
78518 8/8/2002
78519 8/8/2002
000185 HANKS HARDWARE INC
003106 HERITAGE SECURITY SERVIC
Hardware supplies: Parks
Hardware supplies: PW St. Mntc
Hardware supplies: Fire Dept
Hardware supplies: TOO
Hardware supplies: CRC
Hardware supplies: Museum
Hardware supplies: City Hall
Hardware supplies: SMART prgm
Hardware supplies: Aquatics
Hardware supplies: Old Twn
Hardware supplies: PW Inspectors
Hardware supplies: Bldg & Safety
Security officers for 4th of July
1,616.73
433.62
417.92
95.20
93.47
77.98
54.41
48.22
47.31
20.51
8.63
7.14
2,179.86
2,921.14
2,179.86
78520 8/8/2002 002126 HILLYARD FLOOR CARE SUPPL Cleaning Supplies: CRC
115.53
115.53
78521 8/8/2002 004535 ICEPLEX
TCSD day camp excursion
540.00
540.00
78522 8/8/2002 004833 IMPERIAL PAVING COMPANY I R&R A,C,- R.C. @ Front St,
3,608.00
3,608.00
78523 8/8/2002 003183 INSTITUTE OF TRAFFIC
Manual:Uniform Tdfc Cntd Devices
82.50
82.50
78524 8/8/2002
78525 8/8/2002
78526 8/8/2002
001407 INTER VALLEY POOL SUPPLY I Poolsanitizingchemicals
Pool sanitizing chemicals
Pool sanitizing chemicals
000388 INTL CONFERENCE BLDG Uniform building code books
Uniform building code books
004862 INTL PAVEMENT SOLUTIONS I Rel Retention for prjt PW01-30
381.44
343.29
343.29
156.69
21.23
6,581.15
1,068.02
177.92
6,581.15
78527 8/8/2002 002776 INTOUCH AMERICA
June cellular SVCS:Sr Van
June cellular svcs:City Van
30.92
28.44
59.36
Page5
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 6
08/09/2002 11:18:22AM City of Temecula
Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued)
Check # Date Vendor Description
78528 8/8/2002 005215 ISHERWOOD, DEBRA
Amount Paid
Check Total
Refund: Parent & Me Swim Lessons
25.00
25.00
78529
78530 8/8/2002
002140 JAGUAR COMPUTER SYSTEMS Citrix Metaframe 10 User License Pac
Virus Defense License
Network equipment mntc/repaim
Network equipment mntc/repaim
Network equipment mntn/ropaim
005219 JIMENEZ, FRANSICO Refund: Security Deposit
2,107.59
1,064.35
212.50
65.00
65.00
100.00
3,514.44
100.00
78531 8/8/2002 004603 JOHNSON POWER SYSTEMS Rel Retention for Generator
11,037.43
11,037.43
78532 8/8/2002 005208 JOYCE, JOYCE
Refund: Safety Town - Session 2
20.00
20.00
78533 8/8/2002
78534 8/8/2002
003046 K F R O G 95.1 FM RADIO
005054 K M E FIRE APPARATUS
Radio broadcast for Street Painting
Radio broadcast of Hot Summer Nght
Party Jump Rental for Summer Nights
Fire rescue squad vehicle apparatus
816.00
562.00
106.00
67,437.00
1,484.00
67,437.00
78535 8/8/2002
78536 8/8/2002
000820 K R W & ASSOCIATES
002424 KELLEY DISPLAY INC
Engineer plan check svces
Workers' Comp Premium
Banners clean/storage:Hot Summer N
1,350.00
-10.94
180.00
1,339.06
180.00
78537 8/8/2002 005245 KlM, SOO-JIN
Refund: Level 2 Swim Lessons
25.00
25.00
78538 8/8/2002
78539 8/8/2002
000206 KINKOS INC Stationery paper/misc supplies
Stationer~ paper/misc supplies
000548 KIPLINGER CALIFORNIA LEI I E Subscription for Kiplinger Cai Letter
54.86
16.16
73.00
71.02
73.00
78540 8/8/2002
78541 8/8/2002
001282 KNORR SYSTEMS INC,
005247 KOSS, BONNIE
Aquatic - Pool Mntc supplies
Aquatic - Pool Mntc supplies
Refund: Parent & Me Swim Lessons
197.22
29.28
25.00
226.50
25.00
78542 8/8/2002 000209 L & M FERTILIZER INC
Misc Mntc supplies: PW Mntc
506.36
506.36
78543 8/8/2002
78544 8/8/2002
004412 LEANDER, KERRY D.
005207 LEMUS, ISABEL
TCSD instructor earnings
TCSD instructor earnings
TCSD instructor earnings
Refund: Aquatics-Lifeguard Training
240.00
214.00
208.00
130.00
662.00
130.00
78545 8/8/2002 005206 LoTr, DEBBIE
Refund: Sci Adv Camp-Wings Flying
162.20
162.20
78546 8/8/2002 005229 MACIAS, JOSEPHINE
Refund: Level 1 Swim Lessons
6.00
6.00
78547 8/8/2002 005232 MAGHANOY, DEBORAH
Refund: Tennis-Tennis Camp Teen
10.00
10.00
Pages
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 7
08/09/2002 11:18:22AM City of Temecula
Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA
(Continued)
Check # Date Vendor
78548 8/8/2002
78549 8/6/2002
78550 6/6/2002
004141 MAINTEX INC
Description
Parks Custodial Supplies
CRC Custodial Supplies
Sr Ctr Custodial Supplies
TCC Custodial Supplies
CRC Custodial Supplies
CRC Custodial Supplies
Amount Paid
Check ?oral
001967 MANPOWER TEMPORARY SER Temp Help (2) w/e 7/21/02 Savage
Temp Help w/e 06/30/02 Savage
005239 MAYO, KRISTINA Refund: Toddler Swim Lessons
187.30
147.31
141.22
141.22
43.60
7.53
259.73
50.86
25.00
668.18
310.59
25.00
78551 6/6/2002 005233 MCFADDEN, SUSAN
Refund: Level I Swim Lessons
13.00
13.00
78552 8/6/2002 003800 MCLAUGHLIN ENGINEERING 4 Swssd Cases for Land Dev/ClP
130.00
130.00
78553 6/6/2002 003448 MELODYS AD WORKS
Hot Summer Nights Promo Svcs
2,100.00
2,100.00
78554 8/8/2002 004894 MICHAEL BRANDMAN ASSOCIA Jun Eng Svcs:Pala Rd Ph II:PW99-11
1,959.00
1,959.00
78555 8/8/2002
78556 6/6/2002
004208 MILANOS
001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS
Refreshment:Joint Mtg:7/30/02
Refreshments:CAC Mtg:5/30/02
Business Cards:Marks/Sharer/Scanlon
202.50
77.50
128.49
280.00
128.49
78557 8/8/2002 004530 MOVIE EXPERIENCE, THE Day camp excursion:06/15/02
921.00
921.00
78558 6/6/2002
78559 8/8/2002
7856O 6/8/2002
78561 6/8/2002
78562 6/6/2002
000230 MUNIFINANCIAL
002925 NAPA AUTO PARTS
004512 NINYO & MOORE
Assessment Eng Svcs:TCSD
Arbitrage Rebate Svcs:2/02-6/10/02
Misc. Parts & Supplies for PW Maint
Paramedic vehicle maint supplies
Material Testing Svcs:Aquatic Fac.
Adjustment for previous
002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES- ATTN: Jun Display Ads:4th of July
Credit:Service Charge
005240 O'NEAL, CLIFFORD Refund: Level 1/2 Swim Lessons
4,626.84
1,250.00
26.88
10.93.
13,852.00
1,093.50
516.36
55.00
5,878.84
37.81
14,945.50
511.72
55.00
78563 8/8/2002
78564 6/6/2002
78565 8/6/2002
78566 8/6/2002
002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE City vehicle maint~repair svcs
City vehicle maintJrepair svcs
City vehicle maint/repair svca
003116 OLDE SAN DIEGO GAZETTE Aug City Promotion Ad
Sept City Promotion Ad
001171 ORIENTALTRADINGCOMPANY Day Camp Rec Supplies
4th of July Supplies
003762 P M X MEDICAL Paramedic Supplies
Paramedic Supplies
Paramedic Supplies
210.72
' 101.65
25.60
500.00
500.00
329.06
144.75
1,748.11
311.24
118.01
337.97
1,000.00
473.81
2,177.36
Page~
apChkLst
68/09/2002 11:18:22AM
Final Check List
City of Temecula
Page: 8
Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA
(Continued)
Check# Date
78567 8/8/2002
78568 8/8/2002
Vendor Description
004074 PARTY CITY OF TEMECULA IN High Hopes Prgm Supplies
Sister Cities Prgm Supplies
004953 pETE'S MUSIC Entertainment: Summer Nights 8/2/02
Amount Paid
85.6O
84.09
150.00
Check Total
169,69
150.00
78569 8/8/2002 000249 PETTY CASH
Petty cash reimbursement
353.36
353.36
78570 8/8/2002 005228 PHILLIPS, FRAN
Refund:Dog Obedience
68.00
68.00
78571 8/8/2002
78572 8/8/2002
78573 8/8/2002
78574 8/8/2002
004625 PLANT EQUIPMENT, INC Ph III First Response Software:Fire De
Credit:Amount Exceeds Contract
000253 POSTMASTER Express mail & postal service
Express mail & postal services
000254 PRESS ENTERPRISE COMPAN Jun var. public notices
Jun var. public notices:City Clerk
003155 PRICE CHOPPER INC Wristbands for Aquatic Prgm
15,884.40
-3,965.10
63.40
24.20
341.94
'123.89
384.00
11,919.30
87.60
465.83
384.00
78575 8/8/2002 003493 PRO-CRAFTOVERHEAD DOOR Res imprv prgm: Eckhardt
1,145.00
1,145.00
78578 8/8/2002 002880 PRO-CRAFT SASH & SUPPLY Res imprv prgm: Eckhardt
1,761.00
1,761.00
78577 8/8/2002
78578 8/8/2002
005067 PURSUIT TECHNOLOGY INC
002012 R D O EQUIPMENT COMPANY
Install mounting sys for Laptops:M.S.
install mounting sys for Laptops:Fire
Backhoe & tractor repair parts
3,378.00
3,118.18
25.76
6,496.18
25.76
78579 8/8/2002 004029 R J M DESIGN GROUP INC Jun 2002 Aquatic Fac Ph II
1,608.65
1,608.65
78580 8/8/2002 004468 RANCH MUFFLER
TCSD VAN/INSTALL TRAILER HITC
239.00
239.00
78581 8/8/2002
78582 8/8/2002
000907 RANCHO CAR WASH
005062 RAWLINGS, PHIL
City vehicle detailing & fuel
City vehicle detailing & fuel
City vehicle detailing
City vehicle detailing
City vehicle detailing
City vehicle detailing
City vehicle detailing
Reimb:FDIC West Cf:05/02/02
116.15
106.67
59.49
40.00
30.00
16.00
8.00
525.96
376.31
525.96
78583 8/8/2002
78584 8/8/2002
004584 REGENCY LIGHTING CRC Electrical Supplies
Var Parks Electrical Supplies
003742 REHAB FINANCIAL CORPORATI RDA Loan Prgm Services
641.11
321.53
120.00
962.64
120.00
78585 8/8/2002 003591 RENES COMMERCIAL MANAGE Citywide ChanneIWeed
5,000,00
5,000.00
78586 8/8/2002 002412 RICHARDS WATSON &
May 2002 legal services
99,945.54
99,945.54
Page~
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 9
08/06/2002 11:18:22AM City of Temecula
Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA
Check # Date Vendor
78587 8/8/2O02
78588 8/8/2002
78589 8/8/2002
78590 8/8/2002
78591 8/8/2002
78592 8/8/2002
78593 8/8/2002
78594 8/8/2002
78595 8/8/2002
78596 8/8/2002
000418 RIVERSIDE CO CLERK &
000411 RIVERSIDE CO FLOOD
000268 RIVERSIDE CO HABITAT
78597 8/8/2002
78598 8/8/2002
78599 8/8/2002
78600 8/8/2002
78601 8/8/2002
78602 8/8/2002
78603 8/8/2802
78604 8/8/2002
78605 8/8/2002
(Continued)
Description
Jun 2002 Recordings & Copies
Mowing Svcs:Murrieta Crk Channel
Jul 2002 K-Rat payment
000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS DEP 7/01-4/30/02:1aw enfomement rate adj.
002181 RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION Release Liquidated Damages:lst St B
004773 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFFS June 2002 Booking Fees
005119 ROCKHURST COLLEGE
005248 RODILES, LESLIE
005237 RYAN, CASSANDRA
000277 S & S ARTS & CRAFTS INC
001942 S C SIGNS
005213 SAKHAPOUR, BLANCA
005227 SAN DIEGO CO OF THE DA
002285 SCANTRON CORPORATION
005236 SEFFENS, LOLA
005230 SESSUM, VINCENT
003297 SKATE CITY
000645 SMART& FINALINC
005242 SO CALIF BASEBALL USSSA
"How to Supervise People" Handbook
Refund: Parent & Me Swim Lessons
Refund: Toddler Swim Lessons
SMART Prgm Supplies
SMART Prgm Supplies
Teen Prgm Recreation Supplies
Day Camp Supplies
Inst~ll public notice signs:Planning
Refund: Sports-Beginning Golf
Refund: Sports-Beginning Golf
Child Support #661183401610 Freedo
Scantmn forms for inspections
Refund: Level 3 Swim Lessons
Refund: Oil Painting/Basic Water Colo
Day camp excursion - 8/1/02
Sr Ctr Supplies
Supplies for Great Race 6/22/02
Refund:Sec. Deposit:Tournament 5/2
Amount Paid
110.00
5,141.45
1,230.00
290,374.37
50,000.00
8,059.20
13.95
25.00
25.00
4,674.26
353.30
127.86
18.30
715.00
71.20
17.80
25.00
1,714.09
30.00
115.00
396.00
93.37
50.60
100.00
Check Total
110.00
5,141.45
1,230.00
290,374.37
50,000.00
8,059.20
13.95
25.00
25.00
5,173.72
715.00
89.00
25.00
1,714.09
30.60
115.00
396.00
143.97
100.00
Page~
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 10
08/09/2002 11:18:22AM City of Temecula
Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA
(Continued)
Check# Date Vendor
78606 8/8/2002
78607 8/8/2002
000537 SO CALIF EDISON
000282 SO CALIF MUNICIPAL ATHLETI
Description
Aug 2-02-351-5281 CRC
Jul 2-02-502-8077 Maint Fac
Jul 2-10-331-2153 TCC
Jul 2-19-683-3255 Front St Peal
Jul 2-19-683-3263 Front St Ped
Jul 2-22-575-0876 Old Town Front St
Aug 2-22-417-8772 Rancho Vista
Jul 2-19-538-2262 various meters
Jul 2-20-798-3248 Children's Museum
Aug 2-24-077-3069 Pala Rd
Aug 2-23-051-9399 Marg. Ped.
Summer/Fall 2002 Adult Softball
78608 8/8/2002
78609 8/8/2002
005244 SOCIETY FOR HUMAN
000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST
Mbmhp Dues:10/01/02-09/30/03:B.G.
Mbrshp Dues: 10/01/02-09/30/03:D.L
Museum Pest Control Svcs
78610 8/8/2002
78611 8/8/2002
000293 STADIUM PIZZA
005250 STARR, DEBRA
Refreshments:SMART Prgm
Refreshments:PW review mtg:6/05/02
Refund: Picnic Shelter 7/20/02
78612 8/8/2002 004420 STATE COMP INSURANCE FUN Jul workers' comp premium
78613 8/8/2002
78614 8/8/2002
002366 STEAM SUPERIOR CARPET CL
004306 STENO SOLUTIONS
Sr Ctr Carpet Cleaning Svcs
CRC Carpet Cleaning Svcs
Carpet cleaning svcs:Sr Ctr
Transcription Svcs:Police Dept
78615 8/8/2002 001546 STRAIGHT LINE GLASS INC Res imprv prgm: De La Torm
78615 8/8/2002 005234 STRAUGH, ROBERT
Refund: Sports - BB Mens League
78617 8/8/2002
78618 8/8/20O2
000305 TARGET STORE
000309 TEMECULA COPIERS
Teen Prgm Supplies
TCC/High Hopes Prgm Supplies
MPSC Recreation Supplies
PW Office Supplies
Aquatic Supplies
SMART Prgm Supplies
Sr Ctr Supplies
Day Camp Supplies
Day Camp Supplies
SMART Prgm Supplies
Jun copy usage expenses
Supplies for City copiem
Copier staple cartridges
Amount Paid
7,633.23
2,321.93
1,454.77
655.71
394.24
308.51
294.29
157.64
88.99
57.49
15.35
432.00
180.00
160.00
42.00
91.03
69.53
'30.00
17,241.01
315.00
285.00
85.00
1,006.40
445.58
40.00
499.68
292.52
236.96
224.54
166.37
104.58
68.36
28.90
26.46
13.50
4,178.65
370.66
247.83
Check Total
13,382.15
432.00
320.00
42.00
160.56
30.00
17,241.01
685.00
1,006.40
445.58
40.00
1,661.87
4,797.14
Page:10
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 11
08/09/2002 11:18:22AM City of Temecula
Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA
Check# Date Vendor
78619 8/8/2002
78620 8/8/2002
78621 8/8/2002
78622 8/8/2002
78623 8/8/2002
78624 8/8/2002
78625 8/8/2002
78626 8/8/2002
78627 8/8/2002
78628 8/8/2002
78629 8/8/2002
78630 8/8/2002
78631 8/8/2002
(Continued)
Description
000310 TEMECULA CREEK INN INC
001672 TEMECULA DRAIN SERV & PLU
003677 TEMECULA MOTORSPORTS LL
004541 TEMECULA RADIATOR/AUTO R
004260 TEMECULA STAMP & GRAPHIC
000307 TEMECULATROPHY COMPAN
004274 TEMECULAVALLEY SECURITY
003140 TEMECULA VALLEY TAEKWON
005241 THEOBALD, SONJA
004979 TRINIDAD STEEL DRUM BAND
000321 UBNOSKE, DEBBIE
004846 UNITED GREEN MARK INC
000332 VANDORPE CHOU ASSOCIATE
78632 8/8/2002 005243 VARGAS, LUCIA CUNNINGHAM
78633 8/8/2002 004261 VERIZON CALIFORNIA
005238 VESS, LORI
005066 W DEAN DAVIDSON, ARCHITEC
003730 WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC
000339 WEST PUBLISHING COMPANY I
005231 WIKLUND, KlM
78634 8/8/2002
78635 8/8/2002
78636 8/8/2002
78637 8/8/2002
78638 8/8/2002
Amount Paid
Check Total
City of Temecula Logo Golf Balls
Sales Tax for inv# 1001
PDS Park Plumbing Svcs
City Hall Plumbing Svcs
Repair/Maint of P.D. Motomycles
Fire vehicle repair/maint svcs
Rubber Stamps for Fire Prev Dept
Outstanding Volunteer 01/02 Award:P.
Good Neighbor Award:Guinn
Parks Lccksmith Svcs
TCSD Instructor Earnings
Refund: Level 1 Swim Lessons
Entertainment:Summer Nights 8/2/02
Reimb:Planner's Institute:3/20-23/02
Irrigation supplies:TCSD
Jul B&S Plan check services
May Application Dev:Fire Dept
Jun Application Dev:Fire Dept
Refund:Sec. Deposit:Quincinera
JUL XXX-5029 GENERAL USAGE
JUL XXX-1408 P.D. SATELLITE STN
JUL XXX-5509 GENERAL USAGE
JUL XXX-2629 NAGGAR
JUL XXX-0049 GENERAL USAGE
JUL XXX-1289 PRATT
Refund: Level 1 Swim Lessons
Old Town Gym Feasibility Study Svcs
Tree maintenance services
City hall legal publications
Refund: Beginning Baton Twiding
959.17
2.17
55.00
55.00
43.81
706.37
62.26
290.93
6.63
133.22
249.60
16.00
650.00
20.00
2,121.60
6,136.08
5,310.00
3,442.50
100.00
677.72
395.22
146.15
63.36
38.35
38.06
25.00
1,256.90
1,409.30
183.71
64.00
961.34
110.00
43.81
706.37
62.26
297.56
133.22
249.60
16.00
650.00
20.00
2,121.60
14,888.58
100.00
1,358.86
25.00
1,256.90
1,409.30
183.71
64.00
Page:11
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 12
08/09/2002 11:18:22AM City of Temecula
Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA
Check # Date
78639 8/8/2002
78640 8/8/2002
78641 8/8/2002
78642 8/8/2002 003607 XPECT FIRST AID
78643 8/8/2002 003434 Z E P MANUFACTURING
78644 8/8/2002 000348 ZIGLER, GAlL
(Continued)
Vendor Description
004800 WILLAMETI'EINDUSTRIESINC Paper supplies for Copy Center
005249 WINSLOW, MICHELLE Refund: Level 6/7 Swim Lessons
000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLIN Mar lease of copiers/meter usage
City Hall First Aid Kit Supplies
CRC First Aid Kit Supplies
Cleaning Solution/PW Patch Truck
Reimb:Team Pace Concert Night Eve
Amount Paid Check Total
1,973.98 1,973.98
30.00 30.00
629.80 629.80
75.80
20.63 96.43
138.28 138.28
104.10 104.10
Sub total for UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA: 849,213.21
Page:l 2
apChkLst
08/09/2002
11:18:22AM
Final Check List
City of Temecula
Page: 13
197 checks in this report.
Grand Total All Checks:
849,213.21
Page:13
ITEM 4
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANCF!t'h--/t~,~_
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City Manager/City Council
Jim Domenoe, Chief of Police
August 27, 2002
Appropriation of Local Law Enforcement Block Grant (LLEBG) Funds
PREPARED BY:
Lieutenant John Pingle
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approves expenditure of Local Law Enforcement
Block Grant funds and local match funds in the amount of $143,329 for the purchase of police
equipment.
BACKGROUND: The Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Assistance Local Law
Enforcement Block Grant (LLEBG) provides funding to units of local government to underwrite
projects to reduce crime and improve public safety. The funds must be spent according to
specific program purposes which include increasing personnel and equipment resoumes to
support law enforcement and establishing various crime prevention programs. The funds are
being tracked and interest is being allocated based on the unspent money in accordance with
the grant guidelines.
In FY 2000/2001, the City of Temecula was awarded a Local Law Enforcement Block Grant
totaling $44,127. The City is required to provide matching funds in the amount of $4,903 for a
total of $49,030. This money was originally earmarked for a Vail Ranch Police Department
Store Front, however that project did not materialize.
In FY 2001/2002, the City was awarded $45,564 with a requirement to match an additional
$5,063 for a total of $50,627.
The FY 2002/2003 award to the City is in the amount of $39,305. We are required to provide
matching funds in the amount of $4,367 for a total amount of $43,672.
The Police Department has identified the following equipment that will be purchased with these
grant funds and used in accordance with the Department of Justice's grant parameters:
· High speed notification system
· Equipment to support Megan's Law requirements
· Vehicles and/or bicycles
· Digital photo printer
· Digital cameras
· Digitaltape recorders
· Traffic reporting software (Crossroads)
· Computer equipment
· Spike strips
· Preliminary Alcohol Screening (PAS) devices
FISCAL IMPACT: FY 00/01 revenue and FY 01/02 revenue was received into the General
Fund. Funds for FY 02~03 are expected to be received with in the next six months. It is
requested that Council appropriate $143,329 (which includes the grant funding and matching
funds) from the General Fund Unreserved Fund Balance for Police Department expenditure of
FY 00/01, FY 01/02 and FY 02/03 funds in accordance with grant guidelines.
ITEM 5
APPROVAL
CiTY ATTORNEY ~;;;~'~
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OFTEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City ManagedCity Council
Jim O'Grady, AssistantCity Manager
August27,2002
Support ofChangesto Cali~rnia Megan'sLaw
PREPARED BY:
Aaron Adams, Sr. Management Analyst
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt the following resolution:
RESOLUTION NO.02-__
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA SUPPORTING CHANGES TO MEGAN'S LAW TO ALLOW FOR
GREATER PUBLIC INFORMATION ABOUT REGISTERED SEX OFFENDERS
TO BE MADE AVAILABLE TO THE RESIDENTS OF CALIFORNIA IN A
MANNER CONSISTENT WITH THE GUIDELINES OF THE STATES OF
ARIZONA AND TEXAS
BACKGROUND: At the Council meeting of August 13th, City staff and the Police
Department introduced a new public information tool to be added to the City's website. Pin
maps, identifying the general location of registered sex offenders within our City and an update
on the Megan's Law program were Presented to the City Council.
Megan's Law is named after seven-year-old Megan Kanka, a New Jersey girl who was raped
and killed by a known child molester who had moved across the street from the family without
their knowledge. California's Megan's Law arms the public with certain information on the
whereabouts of dangerous sex offenders so that local communities may protect themselves and
their children. The law also authorizes local law enforcement to notify the public about high-risk
and serious sex offenders who reside in, are employed in, or frequent the community.
As a result of these discussions, it was noted that California Law only allows for limited
information about registered sex offenders to be made available to the public unlike the states of
Arizona and Texas. California Law does not allow public information databases to retain the
actual property address and photo of the registered sex offender unlike Arizona and Texas.
If the City Council passes the attached resolution, it will be sent to Governor Davis, local
legislators, Committee on Public Safety and the League of California Cities. In addition, the City
of Temecula will begin an effort to obtain the support of all cities within Riverside County to
make this recommended change to California Megan's Law.
R:~ADAMSA\COUNCILIMegan*s Law steff repod.doc
FISCAL IMPACT: None
ATTACHMENTS: Resolution 02-
R:~ADAMSA\COUNCILIMegan*s Law staff report doc
RESOLUTION NO. 02-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TEMECULA
SUPPORTING CHANGES TO MEGAN'S LAW TO ALLOW FOR
GREATER PUBLIC INFORMATION ABOUT REGISTERED SEX
, OFFENDERS TO BE MADE AVAILABLE TO THE RESIDENTS
OF CALIFORNIA IN A MANNER CONSISTENT WITH THE
GUIDELINES OF THE STATES OF ARIZONA AND TEXAS
WHEREAS, California, for more than 50 years, has required dangerous sex
offenders to register with their local law enforcement agencies, and;
WHEREAS, information on the whereabouts of these sex offenders was not
available to the public until the implementation of the Child Molester Identification Line in July
1995, and;
WHEREAS, the information available was further expanded by California's
Megan's Law in 1996 (Chapter 906, Stats. of 1996), and;
WHEREAS, Megan's Law is named after seven-year-old Megan Kanka, a New
Jersey girl who was raped and killed by a known child molester who had moved across the
street from the family without their knowledge, and;
WHEREAS, California's Megan's Law arms the public with certain information on
the whereabouts of dangerous sex offenders so that local communities may protect themselves
and their children. The law also authorizes Iocat law enforcement to notify the public about high-
risk and serious Sex offenders who reside in, are employed in, or frequent the community, and;
WHEREAS, California Law only allows for limited information about registered
sex offenders to be made available to the public unlike the states of Arizona and Texas, and;
WHEREAS, California Law does not allow public information databases to retain
the actual property address and photo of the registered sex offender unlike Arizona and Texas,
and;
WHEREAS, the safety of our families and community are the top priority, the City
of Temecula strongly urges changes to California State Law to allow for more detailed
information about registered sex offenders be made publicly available in the form of websites
and databases for California residents, and;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Temecula urges the legislature
and Governor Davis to enact legislation to permit such changes to Megan's Law to allow for
greater information about registered sex offenders to be made available to the residents of
California in a manner consistent with guidelines of the states of Arizona and Texas; and
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at
a regular meeting held on the 27th day of August 2002.
Ron Roberts, Mayor
A"FI'EST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that
Resolution No. 02- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 27th day of August, 2002, by the following
vote:
AYES: 0
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
ITEM 6
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE DIRECTOR._~_~______
CITY MANAGER '~,~
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OFTEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council ~~,
Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Servic
August 27, 2002
License Agreement for the S.A.F.E. Program
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the License Agreement between the
City of Temecula and the S.A.F.E. program for use of office space at the Temecula Community
Center.
BACKGROUND: Safe Alternatives for Everyone (S.A.F.E.) was established in 1998 by
concerned citizens and community leaders to help families suffering from abuse and violence.
S.A.F.E.'s goals are to help all children and families in the Temecula Valley to live in violence free
homes schools and communities. S.A.F.E. works with local law enforcement agencies, domestic
violence agencies, local hospitals, schools and community organizations to help families remove
violence from their lives and deal with the effects that violence has had on each family members
welPbeing. Rather than deal with the individuals involvement in a violent act, S.A.F.E. works in a
case management capacity with the entire family to ensure all family members utilize existing
community services to "help families help themselves". The S.A.F.E. program provides family case
management, referral and resource support, public education and family assessment.
This license agreement provides the S.A.F.E. program with office facilities at the Temecula
Community Center located at 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California. This office space enables
the S.A.F.E. program to conduct normal business, meet clients and provide public services.
The term of this agreement is for two (2) years ending June 30, 2004 and the agreement may be
terminated by either party with a 60 day written notice. The S.A.F.E. program will pay the City of
Temecula $50 per month, payable on the 5th day of each month, which will offset the cost of utility
services at the facility.
The S.A.F.E. program will provide an outstanding human service program at the Temecula
Community Center.
FISCAL IMPACT: The S.A.F.E. program will pay $50 per month for utility costs. This will
total $600 on an annual basis.
R:~ZIGLERG\REPORT\082702 CC SAFE Agreement.doc
LICENSE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AND SAFE ALTERNATIVES FOR
EVERYONE (S.A.F.E.) FOR USE OF REAL PROPERTY
THIS LICENSE AGREEMENT is entered into by and between the City of
Temecula, a municipal corporation ("City") and S.A.F.E., a California non-profit corporation
("Licensee") and is made as of August 27, 2002 In consideration of the mutual agreements
contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows:
1. Recitals This Agreement is made with respect to the following facts and for
the following purposes which the parties hereto acknowledge as true and correct:
a. City is the owner of certain real property in the City of Temecula generally
known as the Temecula Community Center located at 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, and
described on Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated by this reference (hereafter
"Community Center");
b. The Licensee is a non-profit corporation which provides community
services for the Temecula area;
c. The Licensee desires to use a portion of the Community Center for its
offices on a temporary basis and the City is willing to allow this temporary use in recognition of
the community services provided to the community by the Licensee.
2. Right to I lse Portian af Cammnnity Center City hereby grants a license to
Licensee to use that portion of the Community Center described on Exhibit A, attached hereto
and incorporated herein, for the Licensee's offices ("Office Space"), subject to the terms and
conditions of this Agreement. The City shall have the Office Space keyed separately from the
remainder of the Community Center. The City shall have the right to use the conference room
which is a part of the Office Space so long as its use does not interfere with the use of the Office
Space by the Licensee.
3. Term of l.icense tn 1 lse Office Space Licensee shall have the right to use the
Office Space pursuant to this Agreement from the date of this Agreement until June 30, 2004.
Either party may terminate this Agreement for any reason by providing a sixty (60) day written
notice of termination to the other party.
4. Re?nnsihilities of the Parties. Licensee shall pay rent for the use of the
Office Space in the amount of fixty dollars ($50.00) payable on the fifth day of every month, or
the first business day thereafter. The rent has been reduced in consideration of the community
services provided by Licensee to the City. City shall obtain the roll-off storage container for the
Licensee at its sole cost and expense. Licensee shall maintain the Office Space in a neat and
clean condition.
R:\ZIGLERG\XAGREEMNkSAFE LICENSE AGREEmENT.DOC 8/6/2002
5. Indemnification Each party shall defend, indemnify, assume all
responsibility for and hold the other party, and its elected or appointed officers and employees
and volunteers, harmless from all costs (including attorneys fees and costs), claims, demands or
liabilities judgments for injury or damage to property and injuries to persons, including death,
which may be caused by any of the actions or inactions of the indemnifying party at the
Community Center, whether such actions or inactions activities be by indemnifying party or
anyone directly or indirectly employed or contracted with by indemnifying party and whether
such damage shall accrue or be discovered before or after termination of this Agreement.
6. Entire Agreement. This Agreement and any documents attached hereto or referred to
herein integrate all terms and conditions mentioned herein or incidental hereto and supersede all
oral or written negotiations and prior writing in respect to the subject matter hereof of this
Agreement, except for that certain funding agreement for community services between the parties
dated July 9, 2002.
7. Taxes. Licensee shall pay all real property taxes, including possessory interest
taxes, and general and special assessments, if any, which may levied against the Office Space as
a result of Licensee's use of the area.
8. Interpretation. Each party had the full opportunity to participate in the drafting of
this Agreement and, therefore, the Agreement shall not be interpreted against any party on the
ground that the party drafted the Agreement or caused it to be prepared.
R:\ZIGLERG\XAGREEMN\SAFE LICENSE AGREE~NT.DOC 8/6/2002
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the
date first above written.
S.A.F.E., a California Non-Profit Corporation
By:
Name:
Title:
By:
Nalne~
Title:
CITY OF TEMECULA
Ron Roberts
Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter M. Thorson
City Attorney
R:\ZIGLERG\XAGREEMN\SAFE LICENSE AGREE~NT.DOC 8/6/2002
EXHIBIT A
DESCRIPTION OF AREA SUBJECT TO LICENSE
The "Office Space" which is the subject of this License and referenced in
Paragraph 2 of this Agreement consists of the special events office and the conference room on
the south end of the Community Center, which are depicted on the floor plan of the Community
Center, attached hereto as Exhibit A-1.
Lot
R:\ZIGLERG\XAGREEMN\SAFE LICENSE AGREEN~NT.DOC 8/6/2002
ITEM 7
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANC/~__~
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
August 27, 2002
Award of Construction Contract for the Citywide Asphalt Concrete Repairs
for FY2002-2003, Project No. PW02-04
PREPARED BY: ~,"~Greg Butler, Senior Engineer
Eric Weck, Assistant Engineer
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:
Award a construction for the Citywide Asphalt Concrete Repairs for FY2002-2003 to All
American Asphalt in the amount of $169,169.00 and authorize the Mayor to execute the
contract.
2. Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders notto exceed the contingency amount
of $16,916.90 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount.
BACKGROUND: On July 23, 2002 the City Council approved the Construction Plans
and Specifications and authorized the Department of Public Works to solicit construction bids for the
subject project.
This Asphalt Repair Project for FY2002-2003 is part of the Annual Street Maintenance Program.
The Program involves fixing portions of streets that require minor repairs and the associated
pavement striping and legends.
The roads included in this project are as follows: Margarita Road, La Colima Road, Front Street,
Overland Trail and Pujol Street.
Four (4) bids were received and publicly opened on August 15, 2002, the results were as follows:
1. All American Asphalt $169,169.00
2. R.J. Noble Company $197,252.50
3. International Pavement Solutions $209,990.40
4. Hardy & Harper, Inc. $212,287.80
A copy of the bid summary is available for review in the City Engineer's office.
The Engineer's Estimate for this project is $110,000.00. In preparing the Engineer's estimate the
typical unit prices for the excavation and the asphalt concrete pavement were escalated by a factor
of 33% above those typically used for these items of work in an effort to account for the number of
small spread out work locations and the unproductive nature of this contract. The bidders unit
1
R:gAGENDA REPORTS~2002\082702~PW02-04 AC award.DOC
prices for these two items of work were, on average, 150% higher than typical unit prices. The Iow
bidder's price to complete the Cold Milling on Ovedand Trail was $14,000 higher than the Engineer's
estimate. These three items of work alone account for the large discrepancy between the
Engineer's Estimate and the Iow bid.
FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate funds have been budgeted in the Public Works Department,
Maintenance Division, Routine Street Maintenance Fiscal Year 2002-2003 Operating Budget
Account No. 001-164-601-5402 for Project No. PW02-04. The total project cost is $186,085.90
which includes the contract amount of $169,169.00 plus 10% contingency amount of $16,916.90.
ATFACHMENTS:
2.
3.
4.
Exhibit "D" - Typical Street Sections
Exhibit "E" - Location Map
Exhibit "F" - Street List for Crackfilling
Contract
2
R:'C, GENDA REPORTS~002\082702\PW02~)4 AC award.DOC
TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
EXHIBIT "D"- TYPICAL STREET SECTIONS
FOR
PROJECT NO. PW02-04
ClTYWIDE A.C. REPAIRS FY2002-03
D-1 r:~cip~pw01~pw01-01~bid exhibit C
EXHIBIT "D"
CITYWIDE A.C. REPAIRS FY2001-02
PROJECT NO.02-04
Existing Proposed
Asphalt Asphalt
Thickness Thickness Type of Type of
Street Location Location Are~ (feet) Maint. Road
1000'
1 Margarita Rd. Moraga 756
#1 Lane n/b Urban
(126 x 6) 0.45 0.53 R & R Pvmt Arterial
n/o Rancho
California
2 Margarita Rd. RD. 390
#2 Lane n/b
[33x4) (33x4) Urban
(21x6) 0.45 0.53 R & R Pvmt Arterial
n/o RCRD
3 Margarita Rd, (102x6) 2,407
(30xl 2)
(24x6) (18x6)
(66x5) (30x6) Urban
(120x5) 0.45 0.53 R & R Pvrnt Arterial
N/E Corner
La Colina
4 La Colima Rd. Rd. @ N. 988
General
Kearny R&R
A.C. (52x19) 0.25 0.33 R & R Pvmt Residential
Front St.
5 Front St. 100' n/o 79S 2,784 Specific Plan
(72X27), Road - Size
(84X10) 0.45 0.53 ;R & R Pvmt Varies
28999 Front
6 Front St. St. north of 1,440
cross gutter Specific Plan
(40x12) Road - Size
(6Ox16) 0.45 0.53 R & R Pvmt Varies
7 Front St. 28999 Front 495
St. south of Specific Plan
cross gutter Road - Size
(33x15) 0.45 0.53 R & R Pvmt Varies
E/B Lane,
8 Ovedand Trail Redhawk 39,000
Pkwy to
Bananal Wa~ Grind 0.2' &
(1300x30) 0.35 Repave ,Major
Intersection
9 Pujol Street at Firstof Pujol and 9,000 Principal
Street First 0.15 Overlay Collector
r:\cip~projects~pw02~pw02-04 ac rep~specs~ac repairs.xls
CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
EXHIBIT "E" - LOCATION MAP
FOR
PROJECT NO. PW02-04
ClTYWIDE A.C. REPAIRS FY02-03
E-!
CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
EXHIBIT "F" - STREET LIST FOR CRACKFILLING
FOR
PROJECT NO. PW02-04
ClTYWIDE A.C. REPAIRS FY02-03
F-[
CITY OF TEMECULA
CRACK FILL
RCRD
YNEZ
Margarita to Cosmic
Margarita to Meadows Parkway S/B
Meadows Parkway to Butterfield Stage Rd.
Via La Colima to 1-15
1-15 to Westerly City Limits
RCRD to Overland Dr.
Overland Drive to Winchester Rd N/B
RANCHO VlSTA
MEADOWSPKWY
Margarita to Butterfield Stage Rd.
Pauba to RCRD
MARGARITA RD
RCRD to Northerly City Limits
SOLANAWAY
Ynez to Del Rey
WINCHESTER RD
Jefferson Ave. to Diaz Rd.
BUSINESSPARKDR.
PAUBAROAD
VlAPUESTADELSOL
Single Oak Dr. - Remainder
Margarita Road to Butterfield Stage Road
PASEO BRILLANTE
PASEO RAYO DEL SOL
VIA BESO DEL SOL
VlACUESTAALSOL
PASEO SONRISA DEL SOL
r:~cip~rojects",pw02~w02-04 ac rep~specs~ac repairs.xls
CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
CONTRACT
FOR
PROJECT NO. PW02-04
CITYWIDE A.C. REPAIRS FY02-03
THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into the 27th day of August, 2002, by and between the
City of Temecula, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CITY", and All American
Asphalt, hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR."
WITNESSETH:
That CITY and CONTRACTOR, for the consideration hereinafter named, mutually agree
as follows:
CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The complete Contract includes all of the Contract
Documents, to wit: Notice Inviting Bids, Instructions to Bidders, Proposal, Performance
Bond, Labor and Materials Bond, Plans and Specifications entitled PROJECT NO.
PW02-04, CITYWIDE A.C. REPAIRS FY02-03, Insurance Forms, this Contract, and all
modifications and amendments thereto, the State of California Department of
Transpodation Standard Specifications (1992 Ed.) where specifically referenced in the
Plans and Technical Specifications, and the latest version of the Standard Specifications
for Public Works Constructioq, including all supplements as written and promulgated by
the Joint Cooperative Committee of the Southern California Chapter of the American
Associated General Contractors of California (hereinafter, "Standard Specifications") as
amended by the General Specifications, Special Provisions, and Technical
Specifications for PROJECT NO. PW02-04, ClTYWIDE A.C. REPAIRS FY02-03.
Copies of these Standard Specifications are available from the publisher:
Building News, Incorporated
1612 South Clementine Street
Anaheim, California 92802
(714) 517-0970
The Standard Specifications will control the general provisions, construction materials,
and construction methods for this Contract except as amended by the General
Specifications, Special Provision, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO,
PW02-04, CITYWIDE A.C. REPAIRS FY02-03.
In case of conflict between the Standard Specifications and the other Contract
Documents, the other Contract Documents shall take precedence over, and be used in
lieu of, such conflicting portions.
Where the Contract Documents describe portions of the work in general terms, but not in
complete detail, it is understood that the item is to be furnished and installed completed
and in place and that only the best general practice is to be used. Unless otherwise
specified, the CONTRACTOR shall furnish all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and
incidentals, and do all the work involved in executing the Contract.
CONTRACT CA-1 R:\CIP~PROJECTS~PW02\PW02~4 AC Rep\Specs~Contract.doc
The Contract Documents ara complementary, and what is called for by anyone shall be as
binding as if called for by all. Any conflict between this Contract and any other Contract
Document shall be resolved in favor of this Contract.
SCOPE OF WORK. CONTRACTOR shall perform everything required to be performed,
shall provide and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment,
and all utility and transportation services required for the following:
PROJECT NO. PW02-04, ClTYVVlDE A.C. REPAIRS FY02-03
All of said work to be performed and materials to be furnished shall be in strict accordance
with the Drawings and Specifications and the provisions of the Contract Documents
hereinabove enumerated and adopted by CITY.
CITY APPROVAL. All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be furnished
and work performed and completed under the direction and supervision, and subject to
the approval of CITY or its authorized representatives.
CONTRACT AMOUNT AND SCHEDULE. The CITY agrees to pay, and CONTRACTOR
agrees to accept, in full payment for, the work agreed to be done, the sum of: ONE
HUNDRED SIXTY NINE THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED SIXTY NINE DOLLARS and NO
CENTS ($169,169.00), the total amount of the base bid.
CONTRACTOR agrees to complete the work in a period not to exceed thirty(30) working
days, commencing with delivery of a Notice to Proceed by CITY. Construction shall not
commence until bonds and insurance are approved by CITY.
CHANGE ORDERS. All change orders shall be approved by the City Council, except that
the City Manager is hereby authorized by the City Council to make, by written order,
changes or additions to the work in an amount not to exceed the contingency as
established by the City Council.
PAYMENTS
LUMP SUM BID SCHEDULE:
Before submittal of the first payment request, the CONTRACTOR shall submit to
the City Engineer a schedule of values allocated to the various portions of the
work, prepared in such form and supported by such data to substantiate its
accuracy as the City Engineer may require. This schedule, as approved by the
City Engineer, shall be used as the basis for reviewing the CONTRACTOR's
payment requests.
UNIT PRICE BID SCHEDULE:
Pursuant to Section 20104.50 of the Public Contract Code, within thirty (30) days
after submission of a payment request to the CITY, the CONTRACTOR shall be
paid a sum equal to ninety percent (90%) of the value of the work completed
according to the bid schedule. Payment request forms shall be submitted on or
about the thirtieth (30th) day of each successive month as the work progresses.
The final payment, if unencumbered, or any part thereof unencumbered, shall be
CONTRACT CA-2 R:\CIP\PROJECTS~PW021PW02~:)4 AC Rep\Specs\Contract.doc
made sixty (60) days after acceptance of final payment and the CONTRACTOR
filing a one-year Warranty and an Affidavit of Final Release with the CITY on forms
provided by the CITY.
Payments shall be made on demands drawn in the manner required by law,
accompanied by a certificate signed by the City Manager, stating that the work for
which payment is demanded has been performed in accordance with the terms of
the Contract, and that the amount stated in the certificate is due under the terms of
the Contract. Partial payments on the Contract price shall not be considered as an
acceptance of any part of the work.
Interest shall be paid on all undisputed payment requests not paid within thirty (30)
days pursuant to Public Contracts Code Section 20104.50. Public Contract Code
Section 7107 is hereby incorporated by reference.
In accordance with Section 9-3.2 of the Standard Specifications for Public Works
Construction and Section 9203 of the Public Contract Code, a reduction in the
retention may be requested by the Contractor for review and approval by the
Engineer if the progress of the construction has been satisfactory, and the project
is more than 50% complete. The Council hereby delegates its authority to reduce
the retention to the Engineer.
LIQUIDATED DAMAGES - EXTENSION OF TIME. In accordance with Government
Code Section 53069.85, CONTRACTOR agrees to forfeit and pay to CITY the sum of one
thousand dollars ($1,000.00) per day for each calendar day completion is delayed beyond
the time allowed pursuant to Paragraph 4 of this Contract. Such sum shall be deducted
from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. Such sum shall be
deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR.
CONTRACTOR will be granted an extension of time and will not be assessed liquidated
damages for unforeseeable delays beyond the control of, and without the fault or
negligence of, the CONTRACTOR including delays caused by CITY. CONTRACTOR is
required to promptly notify CITY of any such delay.
WAIVER OF CLAIMS. On or before making each request for payment under Paragraph 6
above, CONTRACTOR shall submit to CITY, in writing, all claims for compensation as to
work related to the payment. Unless the CONTRACTOR has disputed the amount of the
payment, the acceptance by CONTRACTOR of each payment shall constitute a release of
all claims against the CITY related to the payment. CONTRACTOR shall be required to
execute an affidavit, release, and indemnity agreement with each claim for payment.
PREVAILING WAGES. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of
the State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per
diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each
craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contract, from the Director
of the Department of Industrial Relations. These rates are available from the California
Department of Industrial Relations' Internet Web Site at http://www.dir.ca.gov.
CONTRACTOR shall post a copy of such wage rates at the job site and shall pay the
adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. CONTRACTOR shall comply with the
provisions of Section 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code.
CONTRACT CA-3 R:~CIP\PROJECTS~PW02~PW02~4 AC Rep~Specs\Contract.doc
10,
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, CONTRACTOR shall forfeit to the
CITY, as a penalty, the sum of $25.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each
laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for
any work done under this Contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation
of the provisions of the Contract.
TIME OF THE ESSENCE. Time is of the essence in this contract.
INDEMNIFICATION. All work covered by this Contract done at the site of construction or
in preparing or delivering materials to the site shall be at the risk of CONTRACTOR alone.
CONTRACTOR agrees to save, indemnify, hold harmless and defend CITY, its officers,
employees, and agents, against any and all liability, injuries, or death of persons
(CONTRACTOR's employees included) and damage to property, arising directly or
indirectly out of the obligations herein undertaken or out of the operations conducted by
CONTRACTOR, save and except claims or litigations arising through the sole active
negligence or sole willful misconduct of the CITY.
The CONTRACTOR shall indemnify and be responsible for reimbursing the CITY for any
and all costs incurred by the CITY as a result of Stop Notices filed against the project. The
CITY shall deduct such costs from Progress Payments or final payments due to the CITY.
GRATUITIES. CONTRACTOR warrants that neither it nor any of its employees, agents, or
representatives has offered or given any gratuities or promises to CITY's employees,
agents, or representatives with a view toward securing this Contract or securing favorable
treatment with respect thereto.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST. CONTRACTOR warrants that he has no blood or marriage
relationship, and that he is not in any way associated with any City officer or employee, or
any architect, engineer, or other preparers of the Drawings and Specifications for this
project. CONTRACTOR further warrants that no person in its employ has been employed
by the CITY within one year of the date of the Notice Inviting Bids.
CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT. After the completion of the work contemplated by this
Contract, CONTRACTOR shall file with the City Manager, its affidavit stating that all
workmen and persons employed, all firms supplying materials, and all subcontractors
upon the Project have been paid in full, and that there are no claims outstanding against
the Project for either labor or materials, except certain items, if any, to be set forth in an
affidavit covering disputed claims or items in connection with a Stop Notice which has
been filed under the provisions of the laws of the State of California.
NOTICE TO CITY OF LABOR DISPUTES. Whenever CONTRACTOR has knowledge
that any actual or potential labor dispute is delaying or threatens to delay the timely
performance of the Contract, CONTRACTOR shall immediately give notice thereof,
including all relevant information with respect thereto, to CITY.
BOOKS AND RECORDS. CONTRACTOR's books, records, and plans or such part
thereof as may be engaged in the performance of this Contract, shall at all reasonable
times be subject to inspection and audit by any authorized representative of the CITY.
INSPECTION. The work shall be subject to inspection and testing by CITY and its
authorized representatives during manufacture and construction and all other times and
CONTRACT CA-4 R:\CIP\PROJECTS~PW02\PW02~4 AC Rep~Specs\Contract.doc
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
places, including without limitation, the plans of CONTRACTOR and any of its suppliers.
CONTRACTOR shall provide all reasonable facilities and assistance for the safety and
convenience of inspectors. All inspections and tests shall be performed in such manner
as to not unduly delay the work. The work shall be subject to final inspection and
acceptance notwithstanding any payments or other prior inspections. Such final
inspection shall be made within a reasonable time after completion of the work.
DISCRIMINATION. CONTRACTOR represents that it has not, and agrees that it will not,
discriminate in its employment practices on the basis of race, creed, religion, national
origin, color, sex age, or handicap.
GOVERNING LAW. The City and Contractor understand and agree that the laws of the
State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to
this Contract and also govern the interpretation of this Contract. Any litigation concerning
this Contract shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with
geographic jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event of litigation between the
parties concerning this Contract, the prevailing party as determined by the Court, shall be
entitled to actual and reasonable attorney fees and litigation costs incurred in the litigation.
PROHIBITED INTEREST. No member, officer, or employee of the City of Temecula or of
a local public body shall have any interest, direct or indirect, in the contract of the
proceeds thereof during his/her tenure or for one year thereafter.
Furthermore, the contractor/consultant covenants and agrees to their knowledge that no
board member, officer or employee of the City of Temecula has any interest, whether
contractual, non-contractual, financial or otherwise, in this transaction, or in the business
of the contracting party other than the City of Temecula, and that if any such interest
comes to the knowledge of either party at any time, a full and complete disclosure of all
such information will be made, in writing, to the other party or parties, even if such interest
would not be considered a conflict of interest under Article 4 (commencing with Section
1090) or Article 4.6 (commencing with Section 1220) of Division 4 of Title I of the
Government Code of the State of California.
ADA REQUIREMENTS. By signing this contract, Contractor certifies that the Contractor
is in total compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Public Law 101-
336, as amended.
WRITTEN NOTICE. Any written notice required to be given in any part of the Contract
Documents shall be performed by depositing the same in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid,
directed to the address of the CONTRACTOR as set forth in the Contract Documents,
and to the CITY addressed as follows:
Mailing Address:
William G. Hughes
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
City of Temecula
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
Street Address:
William G. Hughes
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
City of Temecula
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590-3606
CONTRACT CA-5 R:\CIP~PROJECTS~PW02~PW02~4 AC Rep\Specs~Contract,doc
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Contract to be executed on the
date first above written.
DATED:
CONTRACTOR
All American Asphalt
P.O. Box 2229
Corona, CA 92878-2229
(909) 736-7600
Robed Bradley, Vice President
DATED:
CITY OFTEMECULA
RonRobeAs, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
Al-rEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
CONTRACT CA~ R:\CIP\PROJECTS~PW02\PW02-04 AC Rep\Specs\Contract doc
ITEM 8
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY '/.z) ~(~.~.
DIRECTOR OFFINANG~--~
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City ManagedCity Council
William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
August 27, 2002
Parcel Map 30504, Located North of State Highway 79 South, West of
Meadows Parkway, South of Campanula Way
PREPARED BY: [,~T Ronald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works
Gerald L. Alegria, Senior Engineer-Land Development
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve 1) Parcel Map No. 30504 in
conformance with the Conditions of Approval
BACKGROUND: Pamel Map No. 30504 is a four (4) parcel subdivision located north of
State Highway 79 South, west of Meadows Parkway, south of Campanula Way. The map contains
4 commercial parcels. The public improvements were provided as part of the underlying subdivision
Parcel Map 29431. The monuments are also set.
On June 13, 2002, the City of Temecula Planning Commission approved Tentative Parcel Map
30504, with the appropriate Conditions of Approval. This final map is in conformance with the
approved tentative map. The approval of a final subdivision map, which substantially complies with
the previously approved tentative map is a mandatory ministerial act under State law. It should be
noted the Development Impact Fees (DIF) will be due and payable at the time of issuance of the
Building Permits.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
ATTACHMENTS:
2.
3.
4.
Development Fee Checklist
Fees & Securities Report
Project Vicinity Map
Parcel Map 30504
I
r:\agdrpt~OO2\O827\pm30504.map
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLIST
CASE NO. PM 30504
Staff reviewed the following fees relative to their applicability to this project.
FEE
Flood Control (ADP)
Development Impact Fee
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Paid
Not Paid
2
r:~agdrpt~002\0827\pm30504.map
CiTY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT
PARCEL MAP 30504 DATE: August 27, 2002
IMPROVEMENTS FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE MATERIAL & LABOR SECURITY
SECURITY
Street and Drainage $ 0 $ 0
Water $ 0 $ 0
Sewer $ 0 $ 0
TOTAL $ 0 $ 0
Monument $ 0
DEVELOPMENT FEES
City Traffic Signing and Striping Costs
RCFCD (ADP) Fee
Development Impact Fee
SERVICE FEES
Planning Fee
Comprehensive Transportation Plan
Plan Check Fee
Monument Inspection Fee
Fees Paid to Date
Balance of Fees Due
$ 0.00
$ Paid
$ Not Paid
$ 58.00
$ 4.00
$ 830.00
$. 250.00
$ 1,142.00
$ o.oo
3
r:~agdrpt~2002\0827\pm30504.map
ITEM 9
APPROVAL../~ ~)
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City ManagedCity Council
William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
August 27, 2002
Right-of-Way Easement for Corner Cutback at the Southeast Corner of the
Intersection of Pujol Street and Sixth Street
PREPARED BY: ~/Ronald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works ~_~Clement M. Jimenez, Associate Engineer
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council accept the corner cutback area at the
southeast corner of the intersection of Pujol Street and Sixth Street as described in Exhibit "A"
and shown in Exhibit "B".
BACKGROUND: As accepted by City Council, the City Redevelopment Agency contributed
property and financial assistance to be used by Affirmed Housing Partners to develop a home-
ownership project, the Cottages of Old Town, consisting of fourteen new single-family detached
homes and three rehabilitated homes. Two proposed lots are located at the southeast corner of
the intersection of Pujol Street and Sixth Street. All road improvements along the property
frontage of both streets are complete. Therefore, staff waived the applicant's requirement for a
Tentative Parcel Map and instead requested that a Certificate of Compliance be recorded, in
accordance with the City's Subdivision Ordinance.
In addition, it is necessary to have the applicant dedicate right-of-way for a corner cutback at
this corner to allow for the construction of an access ramp in accordance with City Street
Standards. This corner cutback area is necessary to assure pedestrian safety through the
construction of an access ramp and vehicular safety by providing adequate sight distance.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
ATrACHMENTS:
1. Offer of Dedication - Road Purposes (1 Sheet)
2. Exhibit A - Legal Description (2 Sheets)
2. Exhibit B - Plat Map (2 Sheets)
1
R:~agenda reports~002\082702~ujol at sixth st corner cutback.mw dedication
OVa'ER OF DEDICATION - ROAD PURPOSES
The undersigned, being the present rifle owner(s) of record of the herein described parcel of land, do ber~by make an irrevocable offer of
dedication to thc City of Temecula, a political subdivision of the State of California, and its successors or assigns, for public wed, street,
highway and utility purposes, the real property situated in the City of Temecula, County of Riva'side, Slat~ of California' described in
Exhibit "A (wrtimn description) and shown on Exhibi~ "B~ (plat map) attached hereto and incorporated herein by tim r~ference as though
se~ fo~h in full.
It is understood and agreed that the City of Temecul~'aad its successors or assigns shall incur no liability with r~spect to such offer of
dedication, and shall not asmmae any ~pomibility for the offered parcel of land or any improvements thereon or therein, until such offer
has bee~ accepted by appropriate action of the Ci~ Council, or of the local governing bodies or its successors or ~ssigm.
The provisions hereof shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon heirs, successors, ~ssigns, and personal representatives of the
respective pardes hereto.
~ wn~s ~a~o~, th~ p~. ~e e~u~ this im~m~n, ~ 2 5 a~y of J ~/~ , ~0~.
S,gnata~ irmed Housing Partners - TemeculaN~ameL:LC
Title: Manager Title:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA } SS.
COUNTY OF~%U6~%&I~B}5~ ~1~ t~ ~',~z~
On ~ul~ ~C~) 7~00~ .bef~emetbeu~demigned, a Nomry Public in and for theStateofCalifomia'pemonallyappeanxl.~___~
personally~nown to me (e- ~.,,,.a t,, m. ,~ m. ha~i~ of ~ti,¢.o~-d .,,!,~....}to be the person~) whose nameOs) is/~re subsc~bed to the
witlfin immanent and acknowledged to me that h~'~c.'~cq executed the same in his;mmtk~ authorized capacityff,~), and that by
~;~2 signature(~)on the insmunent the person(~), or the en~ty upon behalf of which the person(t) acted, executed the ins~rament.
sig~
CITY OF TEMECULA
Ron Robem
Susan W. Jones, CMC
Ci:y Clerk
EXHIBIT "A"
OFFER OF DEDICATION - ROAD PURPOSES
PUJOL STREET AND SIXTH STREET
THAT PORTION OF THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY, IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA:
THE SOUTHWESTERLY 120.00 FEET OF THE NORTHWESTERLY 70.00
FEET OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCEL:
THE NORTHWESTERLY HALF OF THE TRACT OF LAND FORMERLY USED
AS A RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY AND STATION GROUNDS OF THE
ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILROAD COMPANY, DESCRIBED
BY DEED TO N. R. VAIL, ET AL, RECORDED JUNE 11, 1940 IN BOOK 464,
PAGE 505 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, RIVERSIDE COUNTY RECORDS, SAID
PROPERTY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF LOT 1 IN BLOCK 27,
AS SHOWN BY MAP OF TEMECULA ON FILE IN BOOK 15, PAGE 726 OF
MAPS, SAN DIEGO COUNTY RECORDS; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY IN A
STRAIGHT LINE TO THE MOST EASTERLY CORNER OF LOT 1 IN BLOCK 36
AS SHOWN BY SAID MAP; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY IN A STRAIGHT
LINE TO THE MOST NORTHERLY CORNER OF LOT 10 IN BLOCK 37 AS
SHOWN BY SAID MAP; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY IN A STRAIGHT LINE TO
THE MOST WESTERLY CORNER OF LOT 22 IN BLOCK 25 AS SHOWN ON
SAID MAP; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY IN A STRAIGHT LINE TO THE POINT
OF BEGINNING.
SAID SOUTHWESTERLY 120.00 FEET BEING MEASURED FROM THE
NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF PUJOL STREET.
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF LOT 10 OF BLOCK 37 OF
SAID MAP IN BOOK 15, PAGE 726, THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ON THE
NORTHEASTERLY PROLONGATION OF THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID
LOT 10, SAID LINE ALSO BEING THE SOUTHEASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF SIXTH
STREET, NORTH 44030'55" EAST, 60.00 FEET TO THE NORTHWESTERLY
Page lof2
EXHIBIT "A"
OFFER OF DEDICATION - ROAD PURPOSES
PUJOL STREET AND SIXTH STREET
CORNER OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY, SAID POINT BEING THE TRUE
POINT OF BEGINNING, AND SAID POINT BEING THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER
OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG
THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY, SAID LINE
ALSO BEING THE SOUTHEASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF SIXTH STREET, NORTH
44030'55" EAST, 15.00 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTHWESTERLY LINE,
SOUTH 00029'33" EAST, 21.22 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE
OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY, SAID LINE ALSO BEING THE
NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF PUJOL STREET; THENCE ALONG THE
NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF PUJOL STREET, NORTH 45°30'01" WEST, 15.00 FEET
TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING,
SAID PARCEL CONTAINS 113 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS.
THIS LEGAL DESCRIPTION WAS PREPARED BY ME
OR UNDER MY DIRECTION
EXPIRES 12-31-2003
Aug. 5, 2002
AFFIRMED/T'EMECULA JOB NO. 01029
I:DWG\01~1029~FinalMaps~Plats~egals~StDedication.doc
Page 2 of 2
%
plJJOL
%
8lIE
6TH
MAP
VICINITY
N.T.S.
Exp.12-31-2003
~ No.66~7
THIS PLAT WAS PREPARED BY ME
OR UNDER MY DIRECTION.
~f'OEL~ F. P~ULSON P.L.S.'66~7
EXPIRES: 12-51-2005
OWNER:
AFFIRMED HOUSING PARTNERS-TEMECULA LLC
200 EAST WASHINGTON AVENUE, SUITE 208
ESCONDIDO, CALIFORNIA 92025
MASSON & ASSOCI&TI~S, INC.
PLANNING · ENGINEERING ' SURVEYING
SHEET 1 OF 2
EXHIBIT 'B'
N~
RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION Ii~
PtMOl_ STREET and ~IXTH 9TREET 8/$/2002
hDWG\Of\1029\Finolldop$\Plot$\1029S[Ded-Ol.dwg 08-05-2002
SIXTH STREET
P.O.C, PORTION OF
15 00' ~ PUJOL STREET & SIXTH STREET
NE CORNER, I '
.- % ,~ DEDICA TED HEREON
LOT 10, BLK o/ %// ....
I T.P.O.B. ..',~'--- N44.50 55 E 120.00'
~__~~ / ~ ~ ,o~.oo,
60.00' , ~ ,~
~.oO~/.~ ~o. oo'
-os -oo4
~ ~ APN ~82
~ ' I
~ ~ N44'$0'55"E 120.00'
0
~ i
60'
~o' ~o'
" 30 15 0 30 60
SCALE IN FEET
~ GRAPHIC SCALE
SHEET 2 OF 2
PLANNING · ENGINEERIN~ ~ SURVEYING
~L (760) 741--3570 ' FAX (760) 741--t786 ............. ~ .... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8/5/2~2
~01\1029~FinolMops\PIo~=\1029StDed-O2.dwg 08-05-2002
ITEM 10
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
CITY MANAGER
CITY OFTEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
City ManagedCity Council
FROM:
DATE:
William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
August 27, 2002
SUBJECT:
Acquisition Agreement between the City of Temecula
and Swedish American Corporation
PREPARED BY: er Attar, Principal Engineer
/ Brian Guillot, Assistant Engineer
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:
Approve and execute in substantially the form attached hereto, the PURCHASE AND
SALE AGREEMENT AND ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS BETWEEEN CITY OF TEMECULA AND
SWEDISH AMERICAN CORPORATION, A NEVADA CORPORATION, for the acquisition of
certain real property in the amount of $58,908.00.
2. Direct the City Clerk to record the document
3. Adopt a Resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 2002-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AUTHORIZING THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC
WORKS TO ACCEPT DEEDS OR GRANTS CONVEYING ANY
INTEREST IN, OR EASEMENT UPON, REAL ESTATE AS
PERMI'I-rED BY GOVERNMENT CODESECTION27281
BACKGROUND: On February 26, 2002, the City Council authorized staff to begin
negotiations for the acquisition of certain real properties required for the construction of the
Rancho California Road Widening Project (Project No. PW00-20). On April 2, 2002, the City
delivered to Swedish American Corporation an offer to purchase the real property interests
described in the Agreement. Those negotiations have concluded as set forth herein. The
attached Purchase and Sale Agreement and Escrow Instructions describe the details for the
acquisition of the real property interests necessary to construct the improvements for the
widening of Rancho California Road, east of Ynez Road.
Additionally, Government Code section 27281 permits governmental agencies to authorize one
or more of its officers or agents to accept and consent to acceptance for recordation any interest
in real estate. This authorization, by resolution of the City Council, will expedite the processing
of the real estate transactions.
R:~agdrpt~00\l 114'tjointaccessagre.acs
1
FISCAL IMPACT: The Rancho California Road Widening East of Ynez Road Project is
funded through Capital Project Reserves. The funds for the land acquisition have been
budgeted in the Capital Improvement Program Fiscal Years 2003-2007. Adequate funds are
available in Account No. 210-165-611-5700 for the total acquisition cost of $58,908.00.
A'I-rACHMENTS:
2.
3.
4.
Project Location
Project Description
Purchase and Sale Agreement and Escrow Instructions
Resolution No. 2002-
R:~agdrpt\00\l 114~jointaccessagre.acs
2
°° I1
PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT AND ESCROW
INSTRUCTIONS BETWEEEN CITY OF TEMECULA AND
SWEDISH AMERICAN CORPORATION
(RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD WIDENING, PROJECT NO. PW00-20)
THIS PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT AND ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS
("Agreement") is dated and entered into as of Auqust 27 ,2002
by and between the Swedish American Corporation, a Nevada Corporation ("Seller"),
and the CITY OF TEMECULA, a municipal corporation ("Buyer"), and constitutes both
an agreement to pumhase and sell real property between the parties and the parties'
escrow instructions directed to First American Title Insurance Company ("Escrow
Holder").
RECITALS
A. On April 2, 2002, the Buyer delivered Seller an offer (the "Offer")
to purchase the real property interests described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and
made a part hereof (the "Property") pursuant to Title 1, Division 7, Chapter 1 of the
Government Code of the State of California (Section 7260, et seq.).
B. Buyer intends to use the Property for public purposes.
C. Seller desires to sell and Buyer desires to buy, the Property on the
terms and conditions set forth herein.
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises, operative
provisions and the recitals, which are incorporated herein by this reference, the parties
hereto agree as follows:
1. Purchase and Sale. On the Close of Escrow (as herein defined),
Seller agrees to sell the Property to Buyer, and Buyer agrees to buy the Property from
Seller, on the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth.
2. Purchase Price. The total purchase price for the Property to be
paid by Buyer is the sum of fifty eight thousand nine hundred eight and 00/100 dollars
($58,908.00) (the "Purchase Price"), which sum shall be paid in full in cash on the Close
of Escrow.
3. Title and Title Insurance. Upon the Opening of Escrow, Escrow
Holder shall order from First American Title Company ("Title Company").a title
commitment for the Property. Escrow Holder shall also request two cop~es each of all
instruments identified as exceptions on said title commitment. Upon receipt of the
foregoing, Escrow Holder shall deliver these instruments and the title commitment to
Buyer and Seller. Buyer's fee title to the Property shall be insured at the Close of
Escrow by a CLTA Owner's Standard Coverage Policy of Title Insurance in the amount
of the Purchase Price (the "Policy"). The Policy of title insurance provided for pursuant
to this Section shall insure Buyer's fee interest in the Property free and clear of all liens,
encumbrances, restrictions, and rights-of-way of record, subject only to the following
permitted conditions of title ("Permitted Title Exceptions"):
Swedish Amedcan Agreement 1
(a) The applicable zoning, building and development
regulations of any municipality, county, state or federal jurisdiction affecting the Property;
and
(b) Those non-monetary exceptions approved by Buyer within
fifteen (15) business days after the date Buyer receives the title commitment and legible
copies of all instruments noted as exceptions therein. If Buyer unconditionally
disapproves any such exceptions, Escrow shall thereupon terminate, all funds deposited
therein shall be refunded to Buyer (less Buyer's share of escrow cancellation charges),
and this Agreement shall be of no further force or effect. If Buyer conditionally
disapproves any such exceptions, then Seller shall use Seller's best efforts to cause
such exceptions to be removed by the Close of Escrow. If such conditionally
disapproved non-monetary exceptions are not removed by the Close of Escrow, Buyer
may, at Buyer's option, either accept the Property subject to such encumbrances, or
terminate the Escrow and receive a refund of all funds deposited into Escrow (less
Buyer's share of escrow cancellation charges), if any, and this Agreement shall
thereupon be of no further force or effect. At the Close of Escrow, Buyer's fee title to the
Property shall be free and clear of all monetary encumbrances.
4. Grant Deed. Seller covenants and agrees to deposit with Escrow
Holder prior to the Close of Escrow a Grant Deed duly executed and acknowledged by
Seller, granting and conveying to Buyer the Property. The Grant Deed shall be in a form
satisfactory to Buyer and Buyer's counsel and shall be accepted by Buyer prior to
recording.
5. Authorization to Record Documents and Disburse Funds.
Escrow Holder is hereby authorized to record the documents and disburse the funds and
documents called for hereunder upon the Close of Escrow, provided each of the
following conditions has then been fulfilled:
(a) Title Company can issue in favor of Buyer the Policy,
showing the Property vested in Buyer subject only to the Permitted Title Exceptions.
Escrow Holder shall use the proceeds of the Purchase Price to obtain partial
reconveyance if necessarY, of any monetary liens encumbering the Property, so that the
Property shall be free and clear of monetary ens and encumbrances at the Close of
Escrow.
(b) Escrow Holder shall have received Buyer's notice of
approval or satisfaction or waiver of all of the contingencies to Buyer's obligations
hereunder, as provided for in Section 11; and
(c) Seller shall have deposited in Escrow the Grant Deed
required by Section 4. Unless otherwise instructed in writing, Escrow Holder is
authorized to record at the Close of Escrow any instrument delivered through this
Escrow if necessary or proper for issuance of the Policy, including the Grant Deed.
6. Escrow. The parties hereby establish an escrow ("Escrow") to
accommodate the transaction contemplated by this Agreement. For purposes of this
Agreement, Opening of Escrow shall mean the date on which Escrow Holder shall have
received a fully executed original of this Agreement from Buyer and Seller. Close of
Escrow shall be the date upon which the Grant Deed to Buyer is delivered and recorded
in the Official Records of the County of Riverside. The Close of Escrow shall be on the
date, which is not later than the first business day occurring sixty (60) days after the date
of this Agreement. Before the Close of Escrow, all risk of loss and damage to the
Swedish American Agreement 2
Property from any source whatsoever shall be solely that of Seller. Buyer shall pay all
escrow costs.
7. Escrow Charges and Prorations. Buyer shall pay for the cost of
the CLTA Owner's Standard Coverage Policy of Title Insurance, the Escrow fees and
Escrow Holder's customary out-of-pocket expenses for messenger services, long
distance telephone, etc. Buyer shall pay for recording the Grant Deed and any
documentary or other local transfer taxes, and any other recording fees. If the Escrow
shall fail to close through no fault of either party, Buyer shall pay ali Escrow cancellation
charges.
The parties further agree and hereby authorize and instruct Escrow Agent to
comply with the following tax adjustment procedures:
la) The term "Date of Apportionment' will refer to the date that the conveyance is
made to Buyer, is recorded, or if the County Tax Collector and Assessor deem it
acceptable, the date on which the Grant Deed was accepted by Buyer,
whichever is earlier.
lb)(1) Escrow Agent will, on behalf of Buyer, send the County Assessor, Auditor,
and Tax Collector copies of the instrument evidencing the acquisition of the
subject property by Buyer. This instrument must indicate the date of
apportionment as defined above.
lb)(2) Escrow Agent will forward to County Assessor, Auditor, and Tax Collector
letters asking these agencies to cancel taxes on the acquired Property for the
remaining portion of the fiscal year after the date of apportionment. Attached to
this letter will be a copy of a map of the acquired property and a legal description
of the acquired property. Prior to forwarding the material to these County
agencies, Escrow Agent will ensure that the materials are complete and contact
Buyer if they are not complete.
lc) Seller will be liable for any unpaid taxes, including any penalties or costs
levied for prior tax years constituting a lien at the date of apportionment. Seller
will pay Escrow Agent sufficient funds to cover any such lien, or Escrow Agent
will deduct the amount of such liens from proceeds of sale prior to remittance to
Seller. Escrow Agent will forward such amount to the County as part of the
process of closing escrow.
(d) If the date of apportionment occurs after the lien date, but prior to the
commencement of the fiscal year for which taxes are a lien on the property, no
adjustment will be made to escrow proceeds.
(e) If the date of apportionment occurs after commencement of the fiscal year for
which current taxes are a lien on the property, Seller will be liable for the portion
of current taxes and any penalties and costs that are allocable to the part of the
fiscal year that ends on the day before the date of apportionment. Seller will pay
Escrow Agent sufficient funds to cover any such taxes, penalties, and costs, or
Escrow Agent will deduct the amount of such taxes, penalties, and costs from
proceeds of sale prior to remittance to Seller. Escrow Agent will forward such
amount to the County as part of the process of closing escrow.
Swedish Amedcan Agreement 3
(f) If Seller has paid in advance any taxes on the property required by Buyer
pursuant to this escrow, Seller will be entitled to apply to the County for a refund
of such taxes and Buyer will not contest such application or request that Buyer
be paid a portion of such prepayment. This paragraph will only apply to taxes for
the remainder of the fiscal year, beginning with and including the date of
apportionment, and will only apply to the property acquired by Buyer.
(g) If for any reason Buyer is held liable for any underpayment of taxes by Seller
for that period when the acquired property was owned by Seller, Seller hereby
agrees to reimburse Buyer even if escrow has already closed.
(g)(1) All tax amounts described herein, whether paid, refunded, retained, or
otherwise dealt with, will be for the proper!.y actually conveyed herein, such that
said taxes will be calculated for the conveyed portion of the property conveyed
herein as a portion of a larger Assessor's parcel.
(g)(2) !t is the intent of all parties that each party will be responsible for the taxes
on the portion of the property acquired/retained by him/her/itself. Seller will be
responsible for paying all taxes on the parcel, as defined by the Assessor,
including pursuant to the other provisions of these instructions and excepting no
more than the taxes on the conveyed portion after the date of apportionment.
(g)(3) (i) If the County has established separate values for the conveyed portion
prior to the date of apportionment, those values will be used in determining the
tax amounts in question; and (ii) If the County has not established a separate
value, with separate taxes, for the conveyed portion prior to the date of
apportionment, the taxes on the conveyed portion will
be calculated by multiplying the taxes for the entire parcel (land only) as defined
by the Assessor by the percentage conveyed.
(h) Should the provisions of Article 5, Chapter 4, Part 9, Division 1 of the
California Revenue and Taxation Code governing acquisitions of property by
public agencies be changed during the term of escrow, any terms of this escrow
in conflict with the law then prevailing will be automatically deemed to be no
longer in effect.
8. License to Enter. Seller hereby grants to Buyer and Buyer's
authorized agents, contractors, consultants, assigns, attorneys, accountants and other
representatives an irrevocable license to enter upon the Property for the purpose of
making inspections and other examinations of the Property, including, but not limited to,
the right to perform soil and geological tests of the Property and an environmental site
assessment thereof. Buyer shall give Seller reasonable notice before going on the
Property. Buyer does hereby indemnify and forever save Seller, Seller's heirs,
successors and assigns, and the Property, free and harmless from and against any and
all liability, loss, damages and costs and expenses, demands, causes of action, claims
or judgments, whether or not arising from or occurring out of any damage to the Property
as a result of any accident or other occurrence at the Property which is in any way
connected with Buyer's inspections or non-permanent improvements involving entrance
onto the Property pursuant to this Section. If Buyer fails to acquire the Property due to
Buyer's default, this license shall terminate upon the termination of Buyer's right to
Swedish Ame~can Agreement 4
pumhase the Property. In such event, Buyer shall remove or cause to be removed all
Buyer's personal property, facilities, tools and equipment from the Property.
9. Warranties and Representations of Seller. Seller hereby
represents and warrants to Buyer the following, it being expressly understood and
agreed that all such representations and warranties are to be true and correct as of the
Close of Escrow and shall survive the Close of Escrow:
(a) That (i) on the Close of Escrow the Property shall be free
and clear of any and all hazardous or toxic substances, materials, and waste, including,
but not limited to, asbestos; (ii) the Property is in compliance with all applicable statutes
and regulations, including environmental, health and safety requirements; (iii) all
businesses on the Property have disposed of their waste in accordance with all
applicable statutes, ordinances, and regulations; and (iv) Seller has no notice of any
pending or threatened action or proceeding adsing out of the condition of the Property or
alleged violation of environmental, health or safety statutes, ordinance or regulations To
this end, it is agreed that notwithstanding the conveyance of the Properly to Buyer,
Seller shall indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless Buyer from and against any
and all claims, liabilities, suits, losses, costs, expenses and damages, including but not
limited to attorneys' fees and costs, arising out of any claim for loss or damage to any
property, including the Property, injuries to or death of persons, or for the cost of
cleaning up the Property and removing hazardous or toxic substances, materials and
waste therefrom, by reason of contamination or adverse effects on the environment, or
by reason of any statutes, ordinances, orders, rules or regulations of any governmental
entity or agency requiring the clean-up of the Properly, caused by or resulting from any
hazardous material, substance or waste existing on, under or about the Property on the
Close of Escrow.
(b) That Seller is the sole owner of the Property free and clear
of all liens, claims, encumbrances, easements, encroachments from adjacent properties,
encroachments by improvements or vegetation on the Property onto adjacent property,
or rights of way of any nature, other than those that may appear on the title commitment.
Seller shall not further encumber the Property or allow the Property or to be further
encumbered prior to the Close of Escrow.
(c) Neither this Agreement nor anything provided to be done
hereunder including the transfer of the Property to Buyer, violates or shall violate any
contract, agreement or instrument to which Seller is a party, or which affects the
Properz'y, and the sale of the Property herein contemplated does not require the consent
of any party not a signatory hereto.
(d) There are no mechanics', materialmen's, or similar claims
or liens presently claimed or which will be claimed against the Property for work
performed or commenced pdor to the date of this Agreement. Seller agrees to hold
Buyer harmless from all costs, expenses, liabilities, losses, charges, fees, including
attorney fees, arising from or relating to any such lien or any similar lien claimed against
the Property and arising from work performed or commenced prior to the Close of
Escrow.
(e) There are no written or oral leases or contractual right or
option to lease, purchase, or otherwise enjoy possession, rights or interest of any nature
Swedish Ame#can Agreement 5
in and to the Property or any part thereof, and no persons have any right of possession
to the Property or any part thereof.
(f) Seller has no knowledge of any pending, threatened or
potential litigation, action or proceeding against Seller or any other Party before any
court or administrative tribunal that is in any way related to the Property.
10. FULL PAYMENT OF ALL OBLIGATIONS OF CITY.
(a) It is understood and agreed between Seller and Buyer that
the payments made to Seller as set forth in this Agreement represent an ail inclusive
settlement and is full and complete payment for just compensation for the acquisition of
ail property interests pertaining to the Property and includes and satisfies any and all
other payments, if any, which may be required by law to be paid to Seller arising out of
the acquisition and displacement of the Seller and persons residing on the Property, and
specifically includes, but is not limited to, cl~.ims for severance and other damages,
attorney's fees, interest, expenses of litigation, expert's fees, precondemnation
damages, inverse condemnation, owner participation rights under the Redevelopment
Plan, relocation assistance and/or benefits under the Uniform Relocation Assistance and
Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 4601, et seq.), if applicable, or
under Title 1, Division 7, Chapter 1 of the Government Code of the State of California
(Section 7260, et seq.), and loss of business goodwill under the Eminent Domain Law,
Code of Civil Procedure Section 1263.510, and all costs and expenses whatever in
connection therewith. Seller hereby acknowledges that Buyer has advised Seller of the
possible availability of such relocation assistance rights to Seller and that the waiver of
all rights by Seller herein set forth as free and voluntary.
(b) This Agreement arose out of Buyer's efforts to acquire the
Property through its municipal authority. The parties agree that this Agreement is a
settlement of claims in order to avoid litigation. Seller, on behalf of itself and its heirs,
successors and assigns, hereby fully releases Buyer, its officials, employees, and
agents, from all claims and causes of action by reason of any damage which has been
sustained, or may be sustained, as a result of Buyer's efforts to acquire the Property or
any preliminary steps thereto. Seller furtfier releases and agrees to hold Buyer harmless
from any and all claims and causes of action by reason of any leasehold interest in the
Property.
(c) Seller acknowledges that it may have sustained damage,
loss, costs or expenses which are presently unknown and unsuspected, and such
damage, loss, costs or expense which may have been sustained, may give rise to
additional damages, loss, costs or expenses in the future. Nevertheless, Seller hereby
acknowledges that this Agreement has been negotiated and agreed upon in light of that
situation, and hereby expressly waive any and all rights which they may have under
California Civil Code Section 1542, or under any statute or common law or equitable
principle of similar effect. California Civil Code Section 1542 provides as follows:
"A general release does not extend to claims which the
Creditor does not know or suspect to exist in his favor at
the time of executing the release, which if known by him
must have materially affected his settlement with the
debtor."
Swedish American Agreement 6
(d) This section shall survive the Close of Escrow.
11. Buyer's Contin.qencies. For the benefit of Buyer, the Closing of
Escrow and the Buyer's obligation to consummate the pumhase of the Property shall be
contingent upon and subject to the occurrence of all of the following (or Buyer's written
waiver thereof, it being agreed that Buyer can waive any or all such contingencies) on or
before the Close of Escrow:
(a) That as of the Close of Escrow the representations and
warranties of Seller contained in this Agreement are all true and correct.
(b) The delivery of all documents pursuant to Section 4 hereof.
(c) Title Company's commitment to issue in favor of Buyer of a
CLTA Standard Coverage Owner's Policy of Title Insurance with liability equal to the
Purchase Price showing Buyer's fee interest in the Property subject only to the Permitted
Title Exceptions.
(d) Buyer's approval prior to the Close of Escrow of any
environmental site assessment, soils or geological reports, or other physical inspections
of the Property or the underlying real property that Buyer might perform prior to the
Close of Escrow.
12. Certification of Non-Forei.qn Status. Seller covenants to deliver
to Escrow a certification of Non-Foreign Status in accordance with I.R.C. Section 1445,
and a similar notice pursuant to Califomia Revenue and Taxation Code Sections 18805
and 26131, prior to the Close of Escrow.
13. Default. In the event of a breach or default under this Agreement
by either Buyer or Seller, the non-defaulting party shall have, in addition to all rights
available at law or equity, the right to terminate this Agreement and the Escrow for the
purchase and sale of the Property, by delivering written notice thereof to the defaulting
party and to Escrow Holder, and if Buyer is the non-defaulting party, Buyer shall
thereupon promptly receive a refund of all prior deposits, if any. Such termination of the
Escrow by a non-defaulting party shall be without prejudice to the non-defaulting party's
rights and remedies at law or equity.
14. Notices. All notices and demands shall be given in writing by
certified mail, postage prepaid, and return receipt requested, or by personal delivery.
Notices shall be considered given upon the earlier of (a) personal delivery, (b) two (2)
business days following deposit in the United States mail, postage prepaid, certified or
registered, return receipt requested, or (c) one (1) business day following deposit with an
overnight carrier service. A copy of all notices shall be sent to Escrow Holder. Notices
shall be addressed as provided below for the respective party; provided that if any party
gives notice in writing of a change of name or address, notices to such party shall
thereafter be given as demanded in that notice:
BUYER:
City of Temecula
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92590
Attn: City Engineer
Swedish American Agreement
SELLER:
ESCROW
HOLDER
Swedish American Corporation.
Johnson + Johnson Properties, Inc.
29400 Rancho California Road
Temecula, CA 92589
15. Broker's Commissions. Seller shall pay all claims of brokers,
agents or finders, licensed or unlicensed, and all claims of real estate or other
consultants which exist or may arise as a result of Seller's actions with respect to the
Property. Buyer shall not be liable for any such fees or claims and Seller shall indemnify
Buyer, its officers, employees and agents, from any and all costs, liabilities or judgments,
including attorneys' fees, incurred in defending or paying any such claims.
16. Further Instructions. Each party agrees to execute such other
and further escrow instructions as may be necessary or proper in order to consummate
the transaction contemplated by this Agreem.ent.
17. Amendments. Any amendments to this Agreement shall be
effective only when duly executed by Buyer and Seller and deposited with Escrow
Holder.
18. Miscellaneous
(a) Applicable Law. This Agreement shall be construed and
interpreted under, and governed and enforced according to the laws of the State of
California.
(b) Entire Aqreement. This Agreement supersedes any prior
agreement, oral or written, and together with the Exhibits hereto and any agreements
delivered pursuant hereto, contains the entire agreement between Buyer and Seller on
the subject matter hereof. No subsequent agreement, representation or promise made
by either party hereto, or by or to any employee, officer, agent or representative of either
party, shall be of any effect unless it is in writing and executed by the party to be bound
thereby. No person is authorized to make, and by execution hereof Seller and Buyer
acknowledge that no person has made, any representation, warranty, guaranty or
promise except as set forth herein; and no agreement, statement, representation or
promise made by any such person which is not contained herein shall be valid or binding
on Seller or Buyer.
(c) Successors and Assi,qns. This Agreement shall be
binding upon and inure to the benefit of the heirs, executors, administrators, successors
and assigns of the parties hereto.
(d) Time of Essence. The parties acknowledge that time is of
the essence in this Agreement, notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Escrow
company's general Escrow instructions.
Swedish American Agreement 8
(e) Remedies Not Exclusive and Waivers. No remedy
conferred by any of the specific provisions of this Agreement is intended to be exclusive
of any other remedy and each and every remedy shall be cumulative and shall be in
addition to every other remedy given hereunder or now or hereafter existing at law or in
equity or by statute or otherwise. The election of any one or more remedies shall not
constitute a waiver of the right to pursue other available remedies.
(f) Interpretation and Construction. The parties agree that
each party has reviewed and revised this Agreement and have had the opportunity to
have their counsel and real estate advisors review and revise this agreement and that
any rule of construction to the effect that ambiguities are to be resolved against the
drafting party shall not apply in the interpretation of this Agreement or any amendments
or exhibits thereto. In this Agreement the neuter gender includes the feminine and
masculine, and singular number includes the plural, and the words "person" and "party"
include corporation, partnership, firm, trust, or association where ever the context so
requires. The recitals and captions of the sections and subsections of this Agreement
are for convenience and reference only, and the words contained therein shall in no way
be held to explain, modify, amplify or aid in the interpretation, construction or meaning of
the provisions of this Agreement.
(g) City En,qineer's Authority. The City Engineer is hereby
directed and authorized to execute such other documents, including without limitation,
escrow instructions and amendments thereto, certificates of acceptance, agreements for
payments of lost rent, or certifications, as may be necessary or convenient to implement
the terms of this Agreement.
19. Attorneys' Fees. if either party hereto incurs attorneys' fees in
order to enforce, defend or interpret any of the terms, provisions or conditions of this
Agreement or because of a breach of this Agreement by the other party, the prevailing
party, whether by suit, negotiation, arbitration or settlement shall be entitled to recover
reasonable attorneys' fees from the other party.
20. Assi.qnment. Buyer may assign its rights under this Agreement
or may designate a nominee to acquire title to the Property, provided, however, that any
such assignment or designation shall not relieve Buyer of any of its obligations under
this Agreement.
21. Escrow Holder Need Not Be Concerned. Escrow Holder is not
to be concerned with Section 8, 9, 10, and 15 her. eof, and Buyer and Seller release
Escrow Holder from liability or obligation as to Section 8, 9, 10, and 15 hereof.
/////
IIIII
Swedish Amedcan Agreement , 9
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this
Agreement as of the day and year first written above.
SELLER
SWEDISH AMERICAN CORPORATION, a Nevada
CuL~oration
By:~
BUYER
CITY OF TEMECULA, a municipal
corporation:
Ron Roberts, Mayor
A'I-I'EST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter M. Thorson
City Attorney
Swedish Amedcan Agreement 10
EXHIBIT "A"
Legal Description of the Property
Swedish American Agreement 11
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
FOR RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION
BEING A PORTION OF PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP 20390 AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN
PARCEL MAP BOOK 130, PAGES 29-31, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY,
C,qJF~IA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE MOST EASTERLY CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 1, SAID POIN~ BEING ON THE
NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, LOCATED 55.00 FEET
NOR3HERLY OF AND PARdi i i=L WtTH THE CENTERMNE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD;
THENCE SOUTH 51° 08' 34' WEST, 152_00 FEET ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY, TO THE MOST
SOLffHERLY CORNER OF SAID PARCEL;
THENCE NORTH 83' 02" 29" WEST, 32.99 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH UNE OF SAID PARCEL TO
THE MOST SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF SAID PARCEL, SAID POINT BEING ON THE
EA$/'=~LY RIGHT-OF-WAY, OF YNEZ ROAD, LOCATED 50,00 FEET EASTERLY OF AND
PARN I FI WITH THE CENTERLINE OF YNEZ ROAD, SAID POINT ALSO BEING ON A NON-
TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTHEAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 1950.00 FEET, A
RADIAL UNE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 52° 46~ 30" WEST;
THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE. ALSO BEING THE NORTIflEASTERLY RIGHT-
OF-WAY OF YNEZ ROAD AS SHOWN ON SAID PARCEL MAP 20390, THROUGH A C~NTRAL
A~IGLE OF 00° 21' 51', AN ARC LENGTH OF 12.39 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SAID E~STERLY
RIGHT-OF-W^Y'YNEZ ROAD, A RADIAL MNE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 53° 0~ 21"
WEST;
THENCE NORTH 53' 0~' 21" EAST, ZOO FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 88' 1~O4" EAST~-36,85 FEETTO A POIh,q' ON A LINE-THAT IS 67.~OFEET
NORTHWESTERLY OF AND PAPJu I FL WITH SAID CENTERMNE OF RANCi-K) C~4_IFORNIA
ROAD;
THENCE NORTH 51 ' 08' 34' EAST, 144.(~ FEET ALONG SAID LINE TO A POINT ON THE NORTH
EASTERLY ENE OF SAID PARCEL 1;
THENCE SOUTH 38' 51' 26" EAST, 12.00 FEET ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY lINE TO THE
POINT OF BEGINNING;
CONTAINING 2,218.~8 SQUARE FEET OR 0.0509 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
THIS DESCRIPTION ALSO BEING SHOWN ON THE A~-rACHED "EXHIBIT MAP' AND THEREBY
BEING MADE A PART HEREOF.
PREPARED UNDER MY SUPERVISION:
BRIAN D. FOX
PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR NO. 7171
REGISTRATION EXPIRES" 12/31/~003
Pacje 1 (~ 1
Man~ 6, L~01
BY: t~
Ck'd BY: B. Pisa
(R=2000')
LINE TABLE
EXHIBIT MAP FOR
RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION
P,M, 22,.863
150/51-57
PAR, 8
F
P,M, P. 08gO
~(R=,,So') P..M, 130/29-'31 .~,
'
~ ~' PARCEL I PAR, 1
--~,7.- %: ~-' ~ PROPOSIEO R/~/ -'-
PROPOSED \, ~ · I ,
CURB RE[URN ~ - J L5
P.O.B.
_ (N sros'a4" E)_ J.
RANCHO CALFORHIA RD. -
CURVE TABLE
ECi/ 00'2,'51'' 19so.oo
Pmx~ed For,
4329O BUSINESS PARK DRNE
~ cA 92590
(~)
LEOI~
P,,k~::~ tALo 20390
NUMBEF DIRECTION DISTANCE
L1 ~'. 51'08'34" W 152.00'
L2 N 83'02'29" W 32.99'
L3 S 53'08'21" W 2.00'
L4 S 88'16'04" E 36.§5'
L5 N 51'08'34" E 144.62'
L6 N 38'51'26" W 12,00'
RESOLUTION NO. 2002-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AUTHORIZING THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC
WORKS TO ACCEPT DEEDS OR GRANTS CONVEYING ANY
INTEREST IN, OR EASEMENT UPON, REAL ESTATE AS
PERMITTED BY GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 27281
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVES AS
FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, Government Code Section 27281 permits any political corporation or
governmental agency to authorize one or more of its officers to accept and consent to
acceptance for recordation any interest in real property;
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that authorizing the Director of Public Works to accept
deeds or grants conveying any interest in, or easement upon, real estate will speed up the
processing of real estate transactions;
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to authorize the Director of Public Works to accept
deeds or grants conveying any interest in, or easement upon, real estate;
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED;
The Director of Public Works is hereby authorized to accept deeds or grants conveying
any interest in, or easement upon, real estate for the City Council of the City of Temecula.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a
regular meeting held on the 27th of August 2002 by the following vote:
Ron Roberts, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
R:\agdrpt~002\0827~PW00-20 Swedish Amedcan Agree
3
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify
that Resolution No. 2002- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on this 27th day of August, 2002 by the following
vote:
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
R:\agdrpt~002\0827~PW00-20 Swedish American Agree
4
TEMECULA COMMUNITY
SERVICES DISTRICT
ITEM 1
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
JULY 23, 2002
A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Community Services District was called to order at 7:39
P.M., at the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. President
Stone presiding.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: 5 DIRECTORS:
ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS:
Comerchero, Naggar, Roberts, Pratt, Stone
None
Also present were General Manager Nelson, City Attorney Thorson, and Deputy City Clerk Ballreich.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No comments.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of June 25 and July 9, 2002.
MOTION: Director Naggar moved to approve Consent Calendar Item No. 1. The motion was
seconded by Director Comerchero and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
DISTRICT BUSINESS
1 Naminq of Vail Ranch Park Sites A, B and C
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1
Approve names for the Vail Ranch Park Sites located in the Vail Ranch
development as follows: Park Site A - Vail Ranch Park; Park Site B -
Nighthawk Park and Park Site C - Pablo Apis Park as recommended by the
Community Services Commission.
Development Services Administrator McCarthy presented the staff report (of. record),
commenting on the letter from Mrs. Mary Monahan who had requested that the District consider
naming one park site in memory of her son, Stephen Michael Linen, Jr., a Vail Ranch resident,
who was a CHP Officer and killed in the line of duty August of 2001.
Never having heard of Pablo Apis but relaying no objection to naming Park Site C in his honor,
Director Naggar noted that naming the park after Pablo Apis would reflect an inconsistency with
the City's park naming policy and suggested that because parks are named in perpetuity, that
the proposed names reflect more inspiration.
Minutes.csd\072302 1
In order to determine whether the existing policy is still relevant, Director Comerchero
suggested that the park naming policy be readdressed by the Community Services
Commission.
For the Directors, Community Services Director Parker briefly reviewed the community input
that was received with regard to the naming of the proposed parks.
Director Pratt relayed his support of naming Park Site B in memory of Stephen Michael Linen,
Jr.
Relaying his support of Director Pratt's recommendation, Director Roberts offered the following
motion:
MOTION: Director Roberts moved to name Park Site B in memory of Stephen Michael Linen,
Jr. The motion was seconded by Director Comerchero and voice vote reflected unanimous
approval.
MOTION: Director Naggar moved that the park naming policy be readdressed by the
Community Services Commission. The motion was seconded by Director Pratt and voice vote
reflected unanimous approval.
MOTION: Director Naggar moved that the naming of Park Sites A and C be postponed until the
park naming policy has been readdressed by the Community Services Commission. The
motion was seconded by Director Pratt. (Director Naggar withdrew his motion; see below.)
Speaking in opposition of the proposed motion, Director Comerchero noted that the proposed
names fit the existing criteria of the park naming policy. When the Commission reviews the
policy, Mr. Comerchero suggested that consideration be given to not only naming parks in
memory of individuals.
Noting that the City has possibly outgrown its original policy, Director Roberts concurred with
the Commission readdressing the policy but supported the proposed names for Park Sites A
and C.
In light of his fellow colleagues' comments, Director Naggar chose to withdraw his previously
made motion.
MOTION: Director Naggar moved to approve the recommended names for Park Sites A and C.
The motion was seconded by Director Comerchero and voice vote reflected unanimous
approval.
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT
No comment.
GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT
No comment.
Minutes.csd\072302 2
BOARD OF DIRECTORS' REPORTS
No comments.
ADJOURNMENT
At 7:53 P.M., the Temecula Community Services District meeting was formally adjourned to
Tuesday, August 13, 2002, at 7:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Ddve,
Temecula, California.
ATTEST:
Jeffrey E. Stone, President
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk/District Secretary
[SEAL]
Minutes.csd\072302 3
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
AUGUST '13, 2002
A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Community Services District was called to order at 7:34
P.M., at the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. President
Stone presiding.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: 5 DIRECTORS:
Comerchero, Naggar, Roberts, Pratt, Stone
ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None
Also present were General Manager Nelson, City Attorney Thorson, and City Clerk Jones.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No comments.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Acceptance of Landscape Bonds and A.qreements for Tract No. 23209, Shea Homes
Limited Partnership
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1
Accept the agreement and surety bonds from Shea Homes Limited Partnership
to improve the perimeter slopes and parkways within Tract No. 23209;
1.2
Accept the agreement and surety bonds from Shea Homes Limited Partnership
to improve the landscaped medians on Butterfield Stage Road within Tract No.
23209;
1.3
Accept the agreement and surety bonds from Shea Homes Limited Partnership
to construct a 3.25 acre public park on La Serena and Butterfield Stage Roads
within Tract No. 23209.
MOTION: Director Comerchero moved to approve Consent Calendar Item No. 1. The motion
was seconded by Director Roberts and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
PUBLIC HEARING
2
Tract Map No. 23209 - Service Level B, Residential Street Li.qhtin.q; Service Level C,
Perimeter Landscapinp and Slope Maintenance and Service Level D, Trash and
Recyclin,q Collection Services Rates and Char,qes
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
Minutes,csd\081302 1
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 02-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ORDERING,
CALLING AND GIVING NOTICE OF AN ELECTION TO BE
HELD ON SEPTEMBER 30, 2002 REGARDING SERVICE
LEVEL B AND SERVICE LEVEL C RATES AND CHARGES
FOR TRACT MAP NO. 23209 BEGINNING FISCAL YEAR 2003-
2004 PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XlID, SECTION 6 OF THE
CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION
2.2
Approve the Election Notice, Ballot, and Procedures for the Completion, Return
and Tabulation of the Ballots;
2.3
Authorize staff to mail the ballots to the affected property owners pursuant to the
aforementioned process.
The public hearing was not opened and continued off calendar.
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT
Community Services Director Parker briefly commented on the traveling exhibit created by the
Temecula Valley History Museum staff of the history of Temecu[a Valley, noting that this exhibit will
be made available to the City's elementary schools.
For President Stone, Community Services Director Parker provided information with regard to the
City's successful Summer Months Activities and Recreation in Temecula (S.M.A.R.T.) Program.
GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT
General Manager Nelson welcomed former Mayor Pat Birdsall to the meeting and commented on
her involvement in building the Community Services programs and parks.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS' REPORTS
Director Naggar requested that staff explore the feasibility of a Movies in the Park program as
provided in the City of Riverside.
In light of two recent private closures of teen facilities in the City, Director Comerchero
requested that the Community Services Commission review the potential remodeling of the
City's skatepark.
Minutes.csd\081302 2
ADJOURNMENT
At 7:39 P.M1, the Temecula Community Services District meeting was formally adjourned to
Tuesday, August 27, 2002, at 7:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive,
Temecula, California.
ATTEST:
Jeffrey E. Stone, President
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk/District Secretary
[SEAL]
Minutes.csd\081302 3
ITEM 2
APPRO.V, AL
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE DIRECTOR_~)~_
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
Board of Directors
Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Servic~/.
August 27, 2002
Arts Council Community Grant Agreement
PREPARED BY:
Phyllis L. Ruse, Deputy Director of Community Services
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors approve the Community Grant Agreement
between the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) and the Arts Council of Temecula
Valley in the amount of $40,000.
BACKGROUND: The Arts Council of Temecula Valley has been providing a variety of
arts and cultural activities in the City of Temecula for several years. Some of their events include
the annual Arts Festival and also the Concerts on the Green program.
The Arts Council worked extensively with City staff and AMS Planning and Reseamh in the
development of the City's Cultural Arts Master Plan. By way of this agreement, the Arts Council
commits to continue the implementation process for the Cultural Arts Master Plan. TCSD staff and
the Arts Council have agreed upon goals and objectives that the Arts Council will implement by the
end of this fiscal year as part of this agreement. Two areas of particular emphasis this coming year
will be continuing and augmenting the after-school arts program for youth; and, improved community
awareness through enhancing and expanding the resource directory and the website.
This agreement provides $40,000 in funding for continued implementation of the cultural arts
programs in the City of Temecula. The Arts Council will submit an invoice to the TCSD at the end of
each calendar quarter for the actual costs of personnel, which will be accompanied by appropriate
documentation.
FISCAL IMPACT: Funding in the amount of $40,000 is appropriated in the TCSD budget
for FY 2002-03 for the Arts Council program. These funds are available in account 190-180-999-
5286.
R:\RUSEP~AGENDAS~002-03 Arts Council Grant Agreement.doc
COMMUNITY GRANT AGREEMENT BE'I'~VEEN THE
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AND
THE ARTS COUNCIL OF TEMECULA VALLEY
THIS AGREEMENT is made by and between the Temecula Community Services
District (TCSD), a municipal corporation, and the Arts Council of Temecula Valley, a non-profit
corporation, and is dated as of August 27, 2002. In consideration of the mutual covenants and
agreements contained herein, the parties agree as follows:
1. This Agreement is made with respect to the following facts and purposes,
which each of the parties hereto acknowledge and agree to be true and correct:
a. The Arts Council of Temecula Valley ("Arts Council") coordinates
many programs for the cultural arts within the City of Temecula, which are not provided
by the TCSD's recreation and cultural arts program.
b. The Arts Council warrants and represents to the TCSD that it is a
non-profit, tax exempt corporation under the tax laws of the United State and California,
and agrees to continue in such status during the term of this Agreement.
b. The Board of Directors desires to award a community grant to the
Arts Council in the amount of forty thousand dollars ($40,000.00) for the purpose of
continuing and enhancing its cultural arts programs within the City of Temecula. The
Board of Directors hereby allocates $40,000 for the costs of personnel working for the
Arts Council for fiscal year 2002-2003.
c. This Agreement provides for the manner in which the grant will be
paid to the Arts Council.
2. The TCSD shall pay to the Arts Council on a quarterly basis, an amount equal
to the actual costs for employees of the Arts Council for the preceding quarter, not to exceed
$10,000.00 per quarter or $40,000.00 for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2003. Arts Council
shall submit an invoice to the TCSD at the end of each calendar quarter for the actual costs of
personnel, which shall be accompanied by such documentation as reasonably required by the
Director of Finance to establish that such costs were incurred by the Arts Council. TCSD shall
pay the invoice or provide its written objections to it within thirty (30) working days following
receipt by the TCSD.
3. The term of this agreement shall be July 1,2002 to June 30, 2003.
4. The Arts Council and TCSD staff have developed goals and objectives
which are set forth in Exhibit A. The Arts Council is committed to implementing these Goals
and Objectives and assisting the TCSD in implementing the City's Cultural Arts Master Plan.
5. The TCSD may at any time, for any breach of this Agreement, suspend
or terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the Arts Council at least ten
(10) days prior written notice. If the breach is corrected during this ten-day period, TCSD may,
in its sole and exclusive discretion, rescind the termination. If the TCSD suspends or
R:\RUSEP\CONTRACT~2002-03 Arts Council Community Grent Agreement.doc
terminates a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or
invalidate the remainder of this Agreement. Arts Council shall make available to the TCSD its
books, records and financial documents in such form as to allow TCSD to verify Arts Council's
compliance with the terms of this Agreement.
6. The Arts Council agrees to defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless
the City, TCSD, its officers, officials, and employees from and against any and all claims,
demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, including attorney fees and expert witness fees,
or liability of any kind or nature which the City, its officers, agents and employees may sustain
or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to
property arising out of Arts Council's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions arising out of or in
any way related to the performance or non-performance of this Agreement, excepting only
liability attributable to the active negligence of the City.
7. Arts Council shall procure and maintain, or shall have provided on its
behalf, for the duration of .fiscal year 2002-2003 insurance against claims for injuries to persons
or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the
activities of the Arts Council, its agents, representatives, or employees.
a. Minimum geope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
(1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability form No. CG
00 01 11 85 or 88, including a non-owned auto endorsement.
(2) Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of
California and Employer's Liability Insurance. Workers Compensation Insurance
shall not be required if the Arts Council has no employees.
b. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Arts Council shall maintain limits on the
policies described in Subsection a. of no less than the following amounts unless otherwise
approved by the City Manager:
(1) General Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence for
bodily injury, personal injury and property damage.
(2) Workers' Compensation as required by the State; Employer's
Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury or
disease.
c. Deductibles and Relf-lnsured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured
retentions must be declared to and approved by the City Manager.
d. Other InsHrance Provisions. The general liability policies shall contain, or
be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
(1) The City, TCSD, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers
are to be covered as insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities
performed by or on behalf of the Arts Council; premises owned, occupied or
used by the Arts Council; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by
R:\RUSEP\CONTRAC'r'k2002-03 Arts Council Community Grant Agreement.doc
the Arts Council. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope
of protection afforded to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
(2) For any claims related to this Agreement, the Arts Council's
insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its officers,
officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insured maintained by
the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be excess of the Arts
Council's insurance and shall not contribute with it.
(3) Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the
policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to
the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
(4) The Ads Council's insurance shall apply separately to each
insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the
limits of the insurer's liability.
(5) Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to
state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, cancelled by either party,
reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days' prior written notice
to the City by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the City.
e. " . Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a
current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. Self
insurance shall not be considered to comply with these insurance requirements.
f. Verification of Covc. ra?e. Arts Council shall furnish the City with original
endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed
by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to
be on forms provided by the City. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the
City before work commences. As an alternative to the City's forms, the Arts Council's insurer
may provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including
endorsements effecting the coverage required by these specifications.
8. Arts Council is and shall at all times remain as to the City and TCSD a
wholly independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement
on behalf of Arts Council shall at all times be under Arts Council's exclusive direction and
control. Neither City nor any of its officers, employees or agents shall have control over the
conduct of Arts Council or any of Arts Council's officers, employees or agents, except as set
forth in this Agreement. Arts Council shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or
any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the
City. Arts Council shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability
whatever against City, or bind City in any manner.
9. Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party under
this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (i) personal service, (ii) delivery
by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that
provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail,
certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party
as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice. Notice
R:\RUSEP\CONTRACT~2.002-03 Arts Council Community Grant Agreement,doc
shall be effective upon delivery to the addresses specified below or on the third business day
following deposit with the document delivery service or United States Mail as provided above.
To City:
City of Temecula
43200 Business Park Drive
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, California 92589-9033
Attention: City Manager
To Arts Council:
Arts Council of Temecula Valley
P.O. Box 2337
Temecula, California 92593
Attention: Martha Minkler, Executive Director
10. The Arts Council shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor
any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of the City or
TCSD.
11. This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties
relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or
contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or
written, are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect.
R:\RUSEP\CONTRACT~2002-03 Arts Council Community Grant Agreement.doc
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be
executed the day and year first above written.
CITY OF TEMECULA
Attest:
Jeffrey Stone, President
Temecula Community Services District
Susan Jones, CMC
City Clerk
Approved As to Form:
Peter M. Thorson
City Attorney
ARTS COUNCIL OF TEMECULA VALLEY, a California
non-profit corporation
By:
Name:
Title:
By:
Name:
Title:
R:\RUSEP\CONTRACT~2002-03 Arts Council Community Grant Agreement.doc
~J~IBIT A
OF TEMECULA VALLEY
Post Office Box 2337 ~ Temecula, California 92593 ~ 909. 695.278? ~ Fax 909.695.9438
www.artslnthevalley.org
~ Emall: temarts(~pe.net
BOARD OF TRUSTEES
Albert and Graee Ball
Jobs Cole
Lillnle Fearer
Deborah Fields
Bar.wa Keen
Joa aad Jame Laslda
T~ren Labrani
Sadly Mmer
Sma Miymoto
·may Moore
Mark Mink
~eve ~
~ Harem Ryle
PHIa Smkavich
Jim MeyJer
A~gd~ Morris
Ibret PIrroK
Alitel Wong
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
Martba ~. Minlder
August 12, 2002
Mr. He~iiian parker, Director
Community Services Department
City of Temecula
Post Office Box 9033
Temecula, Callfomia 92589-9033
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BY AND BETWEEN
THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND THE ARTS COUNCIL
OF TEMECULA VALLEY FOR PHASE FOUR:
IMPLEMENTATION OF CULTURAL ARTS MASTER PLAN
The Arts Council of Temecula Valley has accepted the
responsibility given to it by the City of Temecula to implement the
Cultural Arts Master Plan. Worklr~g cooperatively with the City of
Temecula, the Arts Council is positioned to move forward during fiscal
year 2002-2003 to continue implementing additional objectives of five
of the goals outlined in the Cultural Arts Master Plan. The Council,
having facilitated the formation of the Temec~ ~o_ Valley Historical Society
in 2000-2001, win continue to serve as a liaison to and assist the'
Society with preserving the historic legacy of Temecufl~ Valley.
The six goals, as outlined by the .Plan, include providing
opportunities for arts education in schools and the community,
generating greater awareness and participation in arts and cultural
programs, enhancing the community through .art in public places,
assisting encouraging and fostering cooperation among cultural
organizations and individual arts in Temecula Valley, developing
perfo~.dng and vis~m~l arts facilities, and preserving the historic legacy
of Temecula Valley.
in the 2002-2003 fiscal year the Arts Council is committed to
accomplishing the following:
GOALS:
ARTS IN EDUCATION: TO PROVIDE OPPORTUNITIES FOR ARTS
EDUCATION IN SCHOOLS AND THE OVERALL COMMUNITY.
OBJECTIVES:
A. Coordinate efforts with Temecula Valiey Unified School
District to provide an after school arts program at a local
middle school
1. Continue researching public and private
monies to fund the program. (Bank of America
Grant Request is pending.)
2, Program operational by Spring of 2003.
Bo
Work with local parents interested in fo~mJng 'booster~
clubs for the arts in local schools. Clubs would help fund
arts opportunities for local students.
Write grant requests to private Foundations and
corporations to underwrite the fifth annual Summer
Youth Art Institute to be held at a Temecula Valley Unified
School District h/gh school and middle school during the
month of July 2003. Institute provides Individual
Instruction for up to 120 students~ for four one-week
sessions during the summer. Goal is to Increase space
availability so more children can participate. Requests
completed by December 2002.
Partner with Temecula Boys & Girls Club to:
1. Provide arts Instruction component for after school
programs on middle school campuses
2. Organize Summer Youth Art Institute at Boys & Girls
ClUb in summer of 2003.
Distribute information from regional, state or national
programs which would encourage local students and
adults, to showcase their visual or performing arts talent
either in a competition or recognition venue.
ARTS IN EDUCATION, continued:
Co-sponsor with Temecula Valley Unified School District,
the fourth annual Youth Art Exhibition.
PUBLIC INVOLVEMENt. TO GENERATE GREATER AWARENESS
AND PARTICIPATION IN ARTS AND CULTURAL PROGRAMS.
OBJECTIVES:
A. Continue adding to and fine-tuning the Arts Council's web
site.
1.
2.
Expand categories of Resource Directory.
Cross-reference more categories to make information
gathering easier.
Establish additional links to regional and state
cultural and tourism sites.
Provide mechanism for arts organizations or arts
related businesses to promote their
activities/businesses via the website.
Bo
Develop a brochure, available through the City,
Chamber, wineries, libraries, service organizations, stores
and all festival and special event venues, describing
cultural opportunities and resources available through the
Arts Council and City. Design and completion date
contingent upon receiving or raising funding for project.
Produce Arts in the Country Festival 2003 and showcase as
many cultural arts organizations as is physically viable.
Do
Work with The Promenade in Temecula and other public
venues to showcase local visual artists.
III.
PUBLIC ART:. TO ENHANCE THE COMMUNITY THROUGH ART
IN PUBLIC PLACES.
OBJECTWES:
Work with citizens and City of Temecula to place art in
public places throughout the City.
PUBLIC ART, continued:
Work with Temecula Valley Museum, The Promenade in
Temecula and other public venues to showcase local visual
artists.
IV*
COLLABORATION & SUPPORT SERVICES: TO ASSIST,
ENCOURAGE, AND POSTER COOPERATION AMONG CULTURAL
ORGANIZATIONS AND INDIVIDUAL ARTISTS IN TEMECULA
'VALLEY.
OBJECTIVES:
A. Update and maintain the Cultural Arts Master Calendar on
the website. Encourage cultural arts organizations to
submit dates for inclusion.
Assist Musicians Workshop with the creation of a
Community Music Education Center.
Continue meel/ng with and answering requests from other
Cultural Arts Organizations who request assistance.
Continue encouraging arts organizations to notify the
Chamber of Commerce of all event dates for the Master
Calendar.
Eo
Continue assisting other arts organizations by publicizing
their activities and events in Arts Council newsletter and On
website.
Vo
FACILITIES: TO DEVELOP FACILITIES TO ACCOMMODATE
PERFORMING AND VISUAL ARTS
OBJECTIVES:
A. Arts Council to continue working in an advisory capacity
with the Theatre Foundation to procure grants for the
Community Theatre.
Bo
Arts Council to continue participating in fund raising
efforts for the Old Town Community Theatre.
VI.
HERITAGE: TO PRESERVE THE HISTORIC LEGACY OF
TEMECULA VALLEY.
OBJ--:
A. Continue serving as a liaison to the Temecula Valley
Historic Society.
The contract fee of Forty thousand dollars ($40,000.00) for
implementating the Cultural Arts Master Plan is, per City of Temecula
specifications, to be paid quarterly, commencing July 1, 2002 and
ending June 30, 2003. If you need additional information or have
questions please feel free to call me at 909.695.2787. Thank you once
again for your confidence in our efforts.
Executive Director for
The Board of Trustees of
The Arts Council of Temecula Valley
Enclosures
TCSD
DEPARTMENTAL
REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINA ,~
CITY MANAGER /~l
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
Board of Directors
Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Services
August27,2002
Departmental Report
PREPARED BY: Gall L. Zigler, Administrative Secretary
The Master Plan for the Temecula Public Library was adopted at the September 26, 2000 City
Council Meeting. Staff has negotiated a contract with LPA for the final construction documents and
specifications for the Temecula Public Library. Staff is resolving the final issue with the construction
documents and they will be submitted for final plan check. Staff released an RFQ for grant writing
services to apply for the California State Library's Bond Act 2000. Staff and the consultant worked
tirelessly to complete the grant application, which was delivered in person by Phyllis Ruse and
Aaron Adams to Sacramento on June 13, 2002.
The plans for general tenant improvements for the Temecula Children's Museum are in second plan
check. The Community Services Commission reviewed the design concept for the project and
recommended staff take the design concept forward to the City Council. The Board of Directors
approved the Master Plan at the March 26, 2002 City Council meeting and the project is currently
out to bid. Bid opening is scheduled for September 5, 2002.
RHA Landscape Architects is preparing the construction documents for the improvements to Vail
Ranch Park Site "C" adjacent to Pauba Elementary School. This project is identified in this year's
CIP. The new amenities will include a tot lot, picnic shelter, tables, benches and walkways. The
Community Services Commission reviewed and approved the conceptual master plan at their
February 11,2002 Commission meeting. This project is currently in plan check.
The Development Services Division continues to participate in the development review for projects
within the City including Wolf Creek, Roripaugh, Villages of Old Town and Harveston, as well as
overseeing the development of parks and recreation facilities, and the contract for refuse and
recycling, cable television services and assessment administration.
The Maintenance Division completed sports field renovations at the Rancho California Sports Park
for the upcoming soccer season. The Maintenance Division also is coordinating the construction of
the site for the installation of the Voorburg monument to be dedicated at the September 11, 2002
remembrance ceremony. Staff continues to oversee the maintenance of all parks and recreation
facilities, as well as all other City owned public buildings and facilities. In addition, the Maintenance
RSZIGLERG~XDEPTRP'IS0802.doc August 20, 2002
Division assists in all aspects of Citywide special events.
The Recreation Division is currently planning a September 11 remembrance event to be held at the
Temecula Duck Pond. In addition staff is producing the 3~d Annual Summer Concert series every
Thursday night during the month of August in the Thomas H. Langley Amphitheater at the
Community Recreation Center. In addition, the Recreation Division is winding down their summer
recreation programs including Summer Day Camp, the SMART Program and SMART Excursions,
the Learn To Swim and Public Swim Programs. The Recreation Division continues to plan, program
and implement a variety of classes and activities for the community.
R:kZIGLERG\XDEPTRPTX0802.doc August 20, 2002
REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY
ITEM 1
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
August 13, 2002
A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency was called to order at 7:39
P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula.
ROLLCALL
PRESENT: 5 AGENCY MEMBERS: Naggar, Pratt, Roberts, Stone
Comerchero
ABSENT: 0 AGENCY MEMBER: None
Also present were Executive Director Nelson, City Attorney Thorson, and City Clerk Jones.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No input.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of July 23, 2002.
MOTION: Agency Member Naggar moved to approve Consent Calendar Item No. 1. The
motior~ was seconded by Agency Member Stone and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
EXEOUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
No comment.
AGENCY MEMBERS' REPORTS
No comments.
R:\Minutes.rda\081302 1
ADJOURNMENT
At 7:39 P.M., the Temecula Redevelopment Agency meeting was formally adjourned to
Tuesday, August 27, 2002, in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive,
Temecula, California.
Jeff Comerchero, Chairman
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk/Agency Secretary
[SEAL]
R:\Minutes.rda~081302 2
RDA
DEPARTMENTAL
REPORT
APP OV
CITY ATTORNEY ~,/')
FINANCE DIRECTOR~,
CITY MANAGER
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Executive Director/Redevelopment Age~)M~r~bers
John Meyer, Redevelopment Directo~
August 27, 2002
Monthly Departmental Report
Attached for your information is the monthly report as of August 27,
2002 for th~
Redevelopment Department.
First Time Homebuyers Pro.qram
Funding in the amount of $200,000 is available for FY 01-02.
Residential Improvement Pro.qrams
The program budget for FY 01/02 was $250,000 and $237,192 was funded on 57 units. The
program budget for FY 02/03 is $250,000, with $5,000 funded on 1 unit.
.Affordable Housing
The Planning Commission approved the tentative map on August 21. Construction is tentatively
scheduled for the end of September 2002.
Old Town Community Theater
The Architect is working on the Construction drawings and is scheduled to complete them in
August.
The Mercantile Buildin,q Retrofit
Council approved the construction contract for the retrofit on August 13, 2002. Staff estimates
about a 60-90 day construction period.
1
R:\SYERSK~MONTHLLY~reportaugust2002.doc
Facade Improvement/Non-Conformin.q Si.qn Program
improvement/sign projects ara in
The following facade
completed:
· Dentures4 U
Sign Program
· Country Porch
Fira Supprassion S~stem
· House of Jerky
Sign Program
· Temecula Marine
Sign Program
Old Town Promotions/Marketin.q
process
or have recently been
Summer Ni.qhts
The next "First Friday Summer Nights" is scheduled for September 6th celebrating
Buskers Night Out where mimes, clowns, jugglers, musical soloist and other wild street
performers fill the town.
The second "First Friday Summer Nights" themed "Catch the Tropical Wave" was held
on August 2nd in Old Town. The evening featurad the family steel drum band, Calypso
Compromise, Trinidad Steel Drum Band and Pete's Music Beach Band with surf tunes
and beach songs from the 60s. In addition, the Wild Cactus hosted Temecula's Toy
Boat Races. This frae childran's event consisted of toy boats powerad by balloons and
races across Cactus Lake. The Chocolate Florist hosted a street painting workshop for
kids. The August 2nd "First Friday Summer Nights" also included Dynamite Dave, party
jumps, pony rides and carriage rides.
2
R:\SYERSK~MONTHLLY~reporta ugust2002.doc
5 p.m. to § p.m.
LIVE BLUES BA~/DS £F. ATURI#G
Aunt KiZzy's Boyz
Rocky Zharp & the Blues Crackers
Club Django
Party Jumps, Pony Rides, Cerdage Rides
Free Kids Games & Craft~
Dynamite Dave & His Crazy Creations
Ali bands sta~t at 6 p.m. Music is Free. Bring ),our Chairs
9 p.m,
rum
Reggae and Beach Bands
Music starts at 6 p.m.. and is Free
Party Jumps, Pony Rides, Carriage Rides
Free Kids Games & Crafts
TEMECULA BOAT RACESI
Kids compete with our.Toy Boats at Wild Cactus
Dynamite Dave and His Balloon Creations
SAVE THE DATES
STREET PERFORI~IERS
FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 6TH
Mimes, Musicians, and Whacky Performers
Playin9 for Tips
Kids Crafts and Dynamite Dave
Pony Rides, Carrie ge Rides
]t~IERIC]tN]t WEEKEND
OCT. 4TH & OCT. 5TH
FRIDAY 6 P,M,
Bluegrass by Silverado
Top Male Western Vocal/st Dave Stamey
SATURDAY, OCTOBER 5TH
Quilt Show
I~an4 $outl~r~ ~al~forni~'s N~w~pap~
August 8, 2002
GROUP
· .- ! 2002
R 'DEVELopMENT
Mr. John Meyer
Director of Housing & Redevelopment
CITY OF TEMECULA
PO Box 9033
Temecula CA 92589-9033
RE: MISSION VILLAGE APARTMENTS
Dear John:
Affirmed Housing Group recently held a contest for residents to tell us why they like living in
Mission Village Apartments. Enclosed please find a few of the entries.
Sincerely, /~
Gin/~~ ~e~
Sr. P~.~j t Manager
Phone (760) 738-8401 · Facsimile (760) 738-8405
200 East Washington Avenue, Suite 208 · Escondido, California 92025
www. affirmedhousing.com
Attention all Residents of
Mission Village
You could be the next
First Place Winner
of our
Essay / Coloring Contest!
We are having a Contest for all residents who live at
Mission Village
lfyou are interested in entering the contest, here's what you do:
K, ID___~S: Color a picture showing us why you like living at Mission Village
ALL RESIDENTS: Pre?are an Essay telling ~,s why you like living at
Mission Village
Be s,ure to include your name and unit number on your entry.
First Place Winner will receive $75 off of your rent!
Second Place Winner will receive $50 off of your rent!
All entries are du~ in th~ R~ntal Offic~ by June 28, 2002.
GOOD LUCK and HAVE FUN!
Christine Peery
Resident of Mission Village Apartments
Essay contest
28 June 2002
My family has lived in Mission Village Apartments for approximately three and a
half years. We have been truly happy and appreciative of such a fine place to live.
As a single mom with 5 children, 1 was looking for an affordable, safe and
appropriate place to live with my family. I was getting discouraged until someone had
directed me to 'Mission Village Apartments. It was llke a dream come true for my children
and I when we were accepted.
One of the things I like most is having the luxury ora beautiful, clean, landscaped
surrounding without any effort on my part. Since I work full time, it would otherwise be
impossible for me to enjoy this benefit. 1 also like that the manager has an office open
daily in which I can stop in at any time to express concerns or get information. The
managers during the years have changed, but the friendly caring personalities'have not.
The maintenance worker is dedicated and responds quickly whenever I need help or
something fixed.
My children are very happy here. They enjoy swimming in the well-maintained
pool, playing in the play areas of just visiting neighbors. They also look forward to the
frequent contests offered by the management. They enjoy seeing their pictures hanging up
in the office for all to see. They look forward to winning but most of all I think it helps
them to feel good about themselves and a sense of belonging.
Mission Village Apartments seems to be like a little commurdty. Most of the
residents have a lot in ct)mmon, and a shared feeling of contemmem, which has lead us to
developing close friendships among many of our neighbors. The community atmosphere
has helped to make Mission Village Apartments feel like home and has g/yen me a sense of
pride to live here.
ITEM 11
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/C~,t~cil
Debbie Ubnosl~6, Director of Planning
August 27, 2002
Planning Application 99-0451 (General Plan Amendment from Open Space to
Highway Tourist Commercial)
PREPARED BY:
Debbie Ubnoske, Director of Planning
RECOMMENDATION: Approve the General Plan Amendment changing the land use
designation from Open Space to Highway Tourist Commercial.
ADOPT a Resolution entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING THE AMENDMENT OF THE
GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FOR A LOCATION ON
RANCHO HIGHLANDS DRIVE, IDENTIFIED AS
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 944-330-019 (PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. 99-0451)
BACKGROUND: This General Plan Amendment was originally presented to the Planning
Commission at their August 18, 1999 meeting and continued to the December 8, 1999 meeting
where it was unanimously recommended for denial. The Commission's denial was based on
their opinion that the proposed General Plan Amendment would be inconsistent with the
adopted Rancho Highlands Specific Plan. The concern with respect to the inconsistency
centered around the reduction in open space, increasing of the developable area, possible
traffic impacts and the requirement for an alternative transportation system such as a Park and
Ride or a pedestrian bridge over Interstate 15.
The General Plan Amendment was previously considered by the City Council at the December
14, 1999, October 24, 2000 and September 25, 2001 City Council meetings. The proposal was
continued off calendar at the September 25, 2001 City Council meeting. The Council, based on
information contained in the Planning Commission record was supportive of the change from
Open Space to Highway Tourist Commercial but continued to be uncomfortable with the
Specific Plan requirement for a Park and Ride not having been met. The Council directed staff
to research the issue of the Park and Ride and work with a Council\Commission sub-committee
comprised of Council member Mike Naggar and Commission Chairman Dennis Chiniaeff to
achieve resolution to this issue.
R:\G P A\PA99-0451\451PA99 CC4 8-27-02.doc
1
DISCUSSION: The purpose of this City-initiated amendment is to correct a mapping
inconsistency between the Rancho Highlands Specific Plan and the General Plan Land Use
Map. The General Plan Amendment, if approved, will change the designation on 1.4 acres of
property from Open Space to Highway Tourist Commercial. The following information from the
Specific Plan supports the concept that the open space designation has been incorrectly applied
to this property:
The Land Use Diagram, Figure 6 of the Specific Plan, was prepared in a "bubble"
style and is intended to show only a general ~ocation for the land use areas; not to
provide a precise Planning Area boundary.
The Open Space/Major Slope diagram, Figure 12, indicates that a portion of this site
will be a manufactured slope between Planning Areas 1 and 6. Manufactured slopes
are not considered open space areas.
The site consists of Parcel 2 of approved Tentative Parcel Map 23624. This site was
not designated as an open space lot in 1989 when the map was approved. Parcel 1
of this map is now occupied by Embassy Suites and Parcel 3 is occupied by Marie
Calendars.
The subject property has been paying a commercial assessment levied by CFD 88-
12.
Councilmember Mike Naggar and Commissioner Dennis Chiniaeff met with staff to discuss the
Park and Ride issue and the consensus of the sub-committee was to assess the applicant a
mitigation fee of $15,000 that will be contributed to the purchase of an off site park and ride
facility. The applicant is in agreement with this fee. The fee will be payable prior to the
issuance of a building permit and this mitigation fee will become a permanent note on the City's
General Plan Land Use Map upon it's amendment to reflect the new land use designation of
Highway Tourist Commercial.
FISCAL IMPACT: A mitigation fee of $15,000 will be collected and will be a contribution
towards the purchase of an off site park and ride facility.
ATTACHMENTS:
Resolution No. 02- '
Exhibits
A. Location Map
B. Existing General Plan Map
C. Figure 6 of the Rancho Highlands Specific Plan
D. Figure 12 of the Rancho Highlands Specific Plan
December 8, 1999 Planning Commission Staff Report
December 8, 1999 Planning Commission Minutes
December 14, 1999, October 24, 2000, and September 25, 2001 City Council
Minutes
Initial Environmental Study
R:\G P A\PA99-0451\451PA99 CC4 8-27-02.doc
2
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
RESOLUTION NO. 02-._
R:\G P A\PAg9-0451\451PA99 CC4 8-27-02.doc
3
PUBLIC HEARING
Item No.
Supplemental material
(Section 3 of the resolution was amended as per Peter Thorson - attached
revised resolution.)
RESOLUTION NO. 02-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING THE AMENDMENT OF THE
GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FOR A LOCATION ON
RANCHO HIGHLANDS DRIVE, IDENTIFIED AS
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 944-330-019 (PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. 99-0451)
WHEREAS, the City of Temecula initiated Planning Application No. 99-0451, in
accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code;
WHEREAS, Planning Application No. 99-0451 was processed including, but not limited
to public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, notice of the proposed Resolution was posted at City Hall, Temecula
Library, Pujol Street Community Center, and the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. 99-0451 on
December 8, 1999, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City
staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support or opposition
to this matter;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of
the testimony, the Commission recommended denial of Planning Application No. 99-0451;
WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing ped'aining to Planning
Application No. 99-0451 on December 14, 1999, October 24, 2000, September 25, 2001, and
August 27, 2002 at which time interested persons had opportunity to, and did testify either in
support or opposition;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES
RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated
by reference.
Section 2. Findinqs The City Council, in approving Planning Application No. 99-0451
(General Plan Amendment) hereby makes the following findings:
The amendment is compatible with existing and surrounding uses, as the site is
adjacent to similarly designated Highway/Tourist Commercial properties
developed as a hotel and a restaurant. In addition, the site is adjacent to 1-15
and high density residential.
The amendment will not have an adverse effect on the community and is
consistent with the goals and policies of the adopted General Plan. In fact, the
amendment is necessary because of a mapping error when the General Plan
Land Use Map was prepared.
C. The amendments are compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the
community.
R:\G P A\PA99-0451\451PA99 CC4 8-27-02.doc
4
Section 3. Amendments to the Genera Plan Land Use Map. The City Council hereby
amends the General Plan Land Use Map for the parcels identified as APN 944-330-019 to
change the Land Use Designation from "Open Space" to "Highway Tourist Commercial" with the
additional requirement that prior to the issuance of any building permit on property which
includes all or a portion of the subject property, a transportation mitigation fee of fifteen
thousand dollars ($15,000.00) shall be paid to the City and used for park and ride projects.
Section 4. Environmental Compliance. An Initial Environmental Study was prepared for
this project to determine if the proposed changes would result in any environmental impacts
beyond those impacts identified in the Final Environmental Impact Report for the City General
Plan. The Initial Study indicated that overall, the proposed General Plan Amendment will not
result in impacts beyond those originally anticipated for the City General Plan. As a result, the
City Council determines that the potential impacts of this change was adequately addressed by
the Final Environmental Impact Report for the City General Plan and that no fudher
environmental analysis is required.
Section 5. Severability The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this
Resolution are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any
sentence, paragraph, or section of this Resolution to be invalid, such decision shall not affect
the validity of the remaining parts of this Resolution.
Section 6. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution.
Section 7. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City
of Temecula this 27th day of August 2002.
Ron Roberts, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC/AAE
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA
I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Resolution No. 02-__ was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the day of ,2002
by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC/AAE
City Clerk
R:\G P A\PA99-0451\451PA99 CC4 8-27-02.doc
5
RESOLUTION NO. 02-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING THE AMENDMENT OF THE
GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FOR A LOCATION ON
RANCHO HIGHLANDS DRIVE, IDENTIFIED AS
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 944-330-019 (PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. 99-0451)
WHEREAS, the City of Temecula initiated Planning Application No. 99-0451, in
accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code;
WHEREAS, Planning Application No. 99-0451 was processed including, but not limited
to public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, notice of the proposed Resolution was posted at City Hall, Temecula
Library, Pujol Street Community Center, and the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. 99-0451 on
December 8, 1999, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City
staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support or opposition
to this matter;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of
the testimony, the Commission recommended denial of Planning Application No. 99-0451;
WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing pertaining to Planning
Application No. 99-0451 on December 14, 1999, October 24, 2000, September 25, 2001, and
August 27, 2002 at which time interested persons had opportunity to, and did testify either in
support or opposition;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES
RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated
by reference.
Section 2. Findin.qs The City Council, in approving Planning Application No. PA99-
0451 (General Plan Amendment) hereby makes the following findings:
The amendment is compatible with existing and surrounding uses, as the site is
adjacent to similarly designated Highway/Tourist Commercial properties
developed as a hotel and a restaurant. In addition, the site is adjacent to 1-15
and high density residential.
The amendment will not have an adverse effect on the community and is
consistent with the goals and policies of the adopted General Plan. In fact, the
amendment is necessary because of a mapping error when the General Plan
Land Use Map was prepared.
C. The amendments are compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the
community.
R:\G P A\PA99-0451\451PA99 CC4 8-27-02.doc
4
Section 3. Amendments To The General Plan Land Use Map The City Council hereby
amends the General Plan Land Use Map for the parcels identified as APN 944-330-019; change
the Land Use Designation from Open Space to Highway Tourist Commercial.
Section 4. Environmental Compliance. An Initial Environmental Study was prepared for
this project to determine if the proposed changes would result in any environmental impacts
beyond those impacts identified in the Final Environmental Impact Report for the City General
Plan. The Initial Study indicated that overall, the proposed General Plan Amendment will not
result in impacts beyond those originally anticipated for the City General Plan. As a result, the
City Council determines that the potential impacts of this change was adequately addressed by
the Final Environmental Impact Report for the City General Plan and that no further
environmental analysis is required.
Section 5. Severability The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this
Resolution are severable and if for any reason a coud of competent jurisdiction shall hold any
sentence, paragraph, or section of this Resolution to be invalid, such decision shall not affect
the validity of the remaining parts of this Resolution.
Section 6. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution.
Section 7. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City
of Temecula this 27th day of August 2002.
Ron Roberts, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC/AAE
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA
I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Resolution No. 02-__ was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the __ day of ,2002
by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC/AAE
City Clerk
R:\G P A\PA99~0451\451PA99 CC4 8-27-02,doc
5
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
EXHIBITS
R:\G P A\PA99-0451\451PA99 CC4 8-27-02.doc
6
EXHIBIT A
R:\G P A\PA99-0451\451PA99 CC4 8-27-02.doc
7
CITY OF TEMECULA
EXHIBIT - A LOCATION MAP
CASE NUMBER: PA99-0451
CITY COUNCIL ~
EXHIBIT B
R:\G P A\PA99-0451\451PA99 CC4 8-27-02.doc
8
PROJECT SITE
M
EXHIBIT C
R:\G P A\PA99-0451 \451PA99 CC4 8-27-02.doc
9
EXHIBIT D
R:\G P A\PA99-0451\451PA99 CC4 8-27-02.doc
10
z
mZ
(fl m
Z~
O. W
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
DECEMBER 8, 1999 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
R:\G p A\PA99-0451\451PA99 CC4 8-27-02,doc
11
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
December 8, 1999
Planning Application No. PA99-0451
(General Plan Amendment)
Prepared By: David Hogan, Senior Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Department Staff recommends the Planning
Commission:
APPROVE a Negative Declaration for Planning Application
PA99-0451; and,
ADOPT Resolution No. 99- recommending approval of
Planning Application No. PA99-0451 based upon the
Analysis and Findings contained in the Staff Report.
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
City of Temecula
PROPOSAL:
To amend the General Plan Land Use Map to change the Land Use
Designation for a Portion of the Rancho Highlands Specific Plan
from Open Space to Highway Tourist Commercial.
LOCATION:
Between Rancho Highlands Drive and Interstate 15 (also identified
as Assessors Parcel Number 944-330-019)
EXISTING ZONING:
Specific Plan (SP-2)
SURROUNDING ZONING:
North:
East:
South:
West:
Specific Plan
Specific Plan
Specific Plan
Specific Plan
GENERAL PLAN
DESIGNATIONS:
Open Space
EXISTING LAND USE: Vacant
SURROUNDING LAND USE: North:
East:
South:
West:
Highway Tourist Commercial
Vacant
Vacant
Interstate 15
PROJECT AREA
1.4 acres
\\TEMEC_FS101~VOLI\Depts~LANNING~STAFFR PT~451PA99. PC.doc
1
BACKGROUND
This item was initially presented to the Planning Commission at their August 18, 1999 meeting.
At that time, the Commission continued this General Plan Amendment off calendar to provide staff
an opportunity to gather additional information. The purpose of this amendment is to correct a
mapping discontinuity between the Rancho Highlands Specific Plan and the General Plan Land Use
Map. The General Plan Amendment, if approved, would change the designation on 1.4 acres of
property from Open Space to Highway Tourist Commercial.
Based upon staff's review of the Specific Plan, staff believes that the area in question was intended
to be open space when the Specific Plan was adopted in 1988. Staff believes that the site had
originally been envisioned to contain manufactured landscaped slopes. These slopes were
supposed to provide a transition area between two adjacent Planning Areas. Much of the need for
a transition area was eliminated when the site was graded and used as a borrow site in the early
1990s.
To further assist the Commission in their deliberations, staff has re-reviewed various sections of
the Specific Plan and assembled the following information about this area and the "open space"
areas within the Rancho Highlands Specific Plan.
Section IIl.A.2.d on page 16: The Open Space/Recreation discussion states that the 1988
amendments to the Specific Plan would reduce the amount of open space/major slopes
within the project from 60.6 to 34.3 acres. The change represented a shift from away from
non-usable slope areas toward more active recreation sites. The odginal Specific Plan had
no park or recreation facilities shown on the plan. The need to amend the Specific Plan had
occurred when the exact location of the Wildomar Fault was identified. Its discovery made
a portion of the Rancho Highlands Specific Plan undevelopable.
The key fact here is that major slope areas were considered to be open space within the
Plan. The definition of open space used in the Specific Plan is very different from the
definition commonly in use by the City of Temecula. The City Planning Department does
not consider manufactured slopes to be open space since none of the underlying plant and
animal resoumes remain after the grading and landscaping processes are completed.
Section III.A.7 Open Space and Recreation Plan on pages 26 through 28: The open space
issues are discussed in more detail in Section 7. This section states that the Open Space
and Recreation Plan includes natural open space, two lakes, and recreation centers
(paragraph I on page 26). There is another reference to open space in Paragraph 3 that
talks about the acreage of "open space/major slopes" within the project. Most of the rest
of this section discusses the proposed recreation facilities. Figure 12 shows all the "Natural
Open Space/Manufactured Slope" areas within the project. The area of the proposed
General Plan Land Use Map change is shown on Figure 12 as a Natural Open
Space/Manufactured Slope.
Figure 13: The conceptual Grading Plan for the Rancho Highlands Specific Plan also
provides information about future open space areas within the Plan. Specifically, the legend
for the conceptual grading exhibit contains a listing for "Natural Open Space". When the
exhibit is examined, no natural open space areas are actually shown on this Plan. Because
natural open space is shown on the legend and not identified on the conceptual grading
exhibit, staff believes that the open space areas in the original Specific Plan were eliminated
when the Specific Plan was amended in 1988. The original Rancho Highlands Specific Plan
did contain some natural open space areas.
\\TEMEC_FS 101~VO L1 ~Depts~PLA N NIN G~STAFFRPT~451PA99. PC.doc
2
Finally, Figure 6, the Land Use Plan, has been prepared in a "bubble= style and is intended
to show only the general development area for each particular Planning Area. As a result,
staff believes that the Uopen space" area in question, was intended to depict a transition
area between Planning Area 2 (commercial) and Planning Area 6 (high density
residential/commercial). This interpretation is further supported by Riverside County's
approval of Tentative Parcel Map 23624 in 1989. At that time, a single parcel representing
Planning Area 2, was subdivided into three commercial sites. None of the three parcels
contained an identification that an undevelopable open space lot was being created. The
other two lots of Parcel Map 23624 already contain Highway Tourist oriented commercial
uses.
In conclusion, staff believes that the open space areas within the Rancho Highland Specific Plan
were never intended to be open space as we currently understand it. The information in the
Specific Plan, when taken as a whole, indicates that these areas were originally intended to
represent landscaped transitional areas between the different land use planning areas. As a result,
staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the proposed clean-up amendment to
the General Plan. A copy of these various pages from the Rancho Highlands Specific Plan are in
Attachment No. 3.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
.An Initial Environmental Study was prepared for this project to determine if the proposed changes
would result in any environmental impacts or any impacts beyond those identified in the Final
Environmental Impact Report for the City General Plan. The Initial Study indicated that overall, the
proposed General Plan Amendments would not result in impacts beyond those originally anticipated
for the City General Plan. As a result, these potential increases are not considered significant and
staff recommends that a Negative Declaration be adopted.
FINDINGS
To recommend approval of the General Plan Amendment, the Planning Commission must make
the following findings:
1. The amendment is compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community.
2. The amendment is compatible with existing and surrounding uses.
The amendment will not have an adverse effect on the community and are
consistent with the goals and policies of the adopted General Plan.
Attachments:
o
PC Resolution No. 99- - Blue Page 4
Exhibit A - Resolution No. 99- - Blue Page 7
initial Environmental Study - Blue Page 11
Selected pages from the Rancho Highlands Specific Plan - Blue Page 12
Exhibits - Blue Page 13
A. Location Map
B Existing General Plan Map
F:'~Depts~LANNIN G~STAFFR PT~451PA99 - PC.doc
ATTACHMENT NO. 4
DECEMBER 8, 1999 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
R:\G P A\PA99-0451\451PA99 CCA 8-27-02.doc
12
RESOLUTION NQ. 99-0,50
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
~,,~HE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING
A'P..PROVAL BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF PLANNING,
APPI.JCATION NO. PA99-0243 FOR TENTATIVE TRA~
NO. 2'9.2.86 FOR' THE SUBDIVISION OF 9.75 AJ~ES
INTO 38'}~ESIDENTIAL LOTS LOCATED ON Ti'JE'EAST
SIDE OF M:~:RITA ROAD AT THE NORTJ~E'RN CITY
LIMIT AND '"KNOWN AS ASSESSO~.~ PARCEL
NUMBER 911~.' ~-
A Condition requiring
the Plannim or be subject to
the applicant's on.
Design Guidelines for review by
per sta~s and
The motion was
unanimous a
by Commissioner Webster
vote reflected
The applicant
a
Review.
assurance that this project would reflect sure,
project be subject to Product Review rather than Desi
and relayed
}uidelines
r Webster clarified that the project had been conditioned to
Rancho Hi hlands Drive General Plan Amendment Plannin A licaflon
Request to amend the General Plan Land Use Map to change the Land Use
Designation for a portion of the Rancho Highlands Specific Plan from Open
Space to Highway Tourist Commercial,
RECOMMENDATION
It Is recommended by the Planning Department that the Planning
Commission approve the request.
Relaying that this proposal, if approved, would be the fourth Land Use E~ement
Amendment for the year of 1999, Senior Planner Hogan provided an overview of the
staff report (of record); referenced sections of the Specific Plan (per agenda material)
with respect to the Grading Pian, and the Open Space/Recreation area; provided
additional information regarding the incorrect denoted acreage in the Planning Areas;
with respect to Commission querying, relayed that while staff was of the opinion that a
Specific Plan Amendment was not necessary, that if it was the Commission's desire, that
the matter could be brought back to the Commission at a later date; and with respect to
the proposed CIP Project to construct a pedestrian bridge over the Interstate, noted that
the specific location of that project had not been determined.
The Commission's conciusionary comments were, as follows:
Commissioner Webster queried the lack of provisions in this particular proposal with
respect to the requirement to implement a Park and Ride facility, as well as, the
requirement to have a Transportation Systems Management Team and the
establishment of a coordinator (in Planning Area No. 2) and with respect to Planning
Area No. 2, recommended that there be a Specific Plan Amendment to address the
revisions in this particular area.
In response to Commissioner Fahey's comments regarding the implementation of a Par~
and Ride facility, Senior Planner Hogan relayed that the original intent of the requirement
was that there be consideration of alternative transportation details, noting that a Park
and Ride facility would be one option; specified that the language was vague as to
specificity, noting that the proposed pedestrian bddge could qualify as meeting this
particular requirement.
Commissioner Fahey relayed that since there had been no implementation of any
altamative transportation plan, that if this particular site was not maintained as Open
Space, this site would be the sole area available for meeting that criteria.
Chairman Guerriero relayed concurrence with Commissioner Fahey's comments.
While concurring with staff's recommendation that revisions were necessitated,
Commissioner Webster relayed that with respect to the Land Use Plan and the
Grading Plan, this proposal was clearly identified as an Open Space/Slope area; noted
the intent for provision of a buffer within this area between the High Density Residential
and the Office Professional, and between the freeway and the development on site,
which this area satisfied; relayed concern with exceeding the development within
Planning Area No. 2, in conjunction with the lack of provision for an altamafive
transportation element; reiterated the recommendation for a Specific Plan Amendment;
and relayed that he was not in favor of this proposal. '
MOTION: Commissioner Webster moved to close the public hearing; and to deny staff's
recommendation due to the following: 1) the proposal's nonconformance with the
Specific Plan, and 2) the plan to develop additional acreage, rather than maintain an
Open Space area, noting the associated negative impact with respect to traffic.
Chairman Guerriero seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
It was noted that at 6:58 P.M. the meeting recessed, reconvening at 7:09 P.M.
ATTACHMENT NO. 5
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
R:\G P A~PA99-0451\451PA99 CC4 8-27-02,doc
13
DECEMBER 14, 1999
R:\G P A\PA99-0451\451PA99 CC4 8-27-02.doc
14
~ Tern Comerchero relayed the difficulties associated with receiving grant fundin~.a.-'~
Mayor Stone noted that -~:~e-to.,~the preliminary designing of the Ove~a,~fidge Project, that
~mendation. Mayor Pro Tem
~he Temecula-"'~'~nity Services
.PUBLIC HEARINGS
15 Rancho HiRhrands Drive Genera[ Plan Amendment (Plannina Application PA99-0451) -
RECOMMENDATION:
15.1 Approvea Negative Declaration for Planning Application PA99-0451;
15,2 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 99-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE Cl'l'~ OF
TEMECULA AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE
MAP FOR A LOCATION ON RANCHO HIGHLANDS DRIVE
IDENTIFIED AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS. 944-330-019
(PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0451)
Due to the issues that had been raised at the Planning Commission meeting regarding this
particular General Plan Amendment, Deputy City Manager Thomhill recommended that the
matter be continued off calendar in order for staff to address those issues.
MOTION: Mayor Pro Tern Comerchero moved to contrnue this Agenda Item off calendar.
Councilman Roberts seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous approval,
In-'d'Oo~k~te_~board Park (located within an existing building at 43300 Busine.~s-Pal'E~Drive]
R ECOMME~ D~
16.1 Deny the app~ Planning Commission of Planning
'~d6~: (Minor Conditio~a '~
OCTOBER 24, 2000
R:\G P A\PA99-0451\451PA99 CC4 8-27-02.doc
15
son's comments, Mr. Stone reiterated that multi-family developments create less traffic than
sin lily dwelling units. In closing, Mr. Stone stated that he would view the proposed
a visio~ ~ City.
as
Noting that a Cit I decision was made with regard to this I
City Council meeting, ~qan Pratt stated that the City Attorney
resolution for denial and th, d vote on it.
3, 2000,
appropriate
At this time. Mayor Stone requested
continue the matter to the November 1,
AYES: Comerchero,
call vote
meeting.
previously made motion to
NOES: Naggai
ABSENT:
pA?.:01.. ..... a short recess and reconvened the City Counci meeb~le~at 9:15
,-,~.~..~. ~'.n~, Tne city Council convened as the Community Services District and the
~ ~ ........... · ................. u ............I the-
8 Rancho Highlands Drive General Plan Amendment (Planninq Application No. PA99-0451)
RECOMMENDATION:
8.1 Adopt a Negative Declaration for Planning Application No. PA99-0451;
8.2 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 2000-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING THE AMENDMENT OF THE
GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FOR A LOCATION ON
RANCHO HIGHLANDS DRIVE FROM OPEN SPACE TO
HIGHWAY TOURIST COMMERCIAL IDENTIFIED AS
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 944-330-0'19 (PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. PA99-0451)
Planning Director Ubnoske presented the staff report (of record), reviewing the application,
advising that staff would view the proposed recommendation as a clean-up or mapping error on
the General Plan Land Use Map and. therefore, it is being recommended to change the
designation of the 1.4 acres from open space to highway tourist commercial. She advised that
the Planning Commission had denied the request, voicing concerns that the amendment wouJd
increase developable area and, thereby, as well could potentially increase traffic. By way of an
exhibit, Planning Director Ubnoske relayed that the County's Specific Plan identifies general
boundaries for the planning areas. While the area of discussion is designated as open
space/manufactured slope, she noted that it would be staff's opinion that these general
boundaries were established with the intent of being refined once projects were submitted to the
City and stated that it would be staff's opinion that the site was originally envisioned to contain
manufactured sJopes which would have provided a buffer between two the planning areas.
Referencing the conceptual grading plan, Planning Director Ubnoske advised that the area of
discussion has been listed as natural open space but noted that there are actually no areas of
R:\Minutes\102400
11
natural open space on the exhibit. She stated that, in staff's opinion, the open space areas
were eliminated when the Specific Plan was amended in 1988. Subsequent to the Planning
Commission meeting, Ms. Ubnoske advised that the City Attorney had received information
indicating that on an approved map the site of discussion is reflected as a commercial parcel
and that a commercial assessment has been levied on the property of discussion by way of
CFD 88-12.
For Mayor Pro Tern Comerchero, Planning Director Ubnoske reiterated that the property owner
has been paying a commercial assessment.
With the property owner paying a commercial assessment, City Attorney Thorson advised that
this would be one in a number of factors indicating that the property in question has been
treated as commercial property and because the Specific Plan does not reflect precise meets
and bounds descriptions of open space/manufactured slopes/commercial, it would be necessary
to review all the various factors with respect to the Tentative Maps.
In response to Councilman Naggar, Planning Director Ubnoske advised that an application for
the site of discussion has been received by staff; that staff has been talking with the
representatives regarding the construction of a hotel; that staff, after some research, had
previously determined the mapping error but had not presented it to the City Council for action
until an application had been presented to staff; and that the applicant was unaware of the park
and ride requirement but that staff will work with the applicant.
To his understanding, Councilman Naggar noted that Planning Area 2 was divided into three
separate lots (Marie Callendars, hotel, and open space). Because the Specific Plan as well
requires the construction of a park and ride, Councilman Naggar questioned where it would be
staff's intent to construct the park and ride. For Councilman Naggar, Planning Director Ubnoske
clarified that the requested amendment would not eliminate the Specific Plan requirement for a
park and ride; advised that the park and ride requirement was placed on both Planning Area I
and 2 and, therefore, it may be constructed in either Planning Area; stated that a park and ride
may not be constructed on property designated as open space; and clarified that the City
currently has one park and ride by Carl's Jr. (Winchester Road) and that three additional sites
are planned - one at the mall, one on SR79, and another at the site of discussion.
In light of the potential of a Freeway Flyer, Councilman Roberts spoke in support of the park and
ride at the site of discussion and stated that the area has no use as open space.
City Attorney Thorson, for Mayor Pro Tem Comerchero, confirmed that the proposed General
Plan amendment will not waive the Specific Plan requirement to construct a park and ride.
At this time, Mayor Stone opened the public headng.
Ms. May Lorah, 35555 Monte De Oro, representing Citizens First for Temecula Valley, relayed
her opposition to the proposed amendment and stated that under the California Environmental
Quality Act, the amendment must be evaluated for environmental impacts and, therefore, an
Environmental Impact Report should be completed.
Mr. Bill Johnson, 29400 Rancho California Road, primary property owner of the Rancho
Highlands Plan, noted that the open space designation along the freeway is an important part of
the Specific Plan as well as the General Plan; that the site of discussion would give the City the
opportunity to create a desirable entrance development to the City of Temecula, along Rancho
California Road; and that in light of this property being the last remaining entry property to the
City, he recommended that careful attention be given to the site.
R:\Minutes\102400
12
There being no additional input, the public hearing was closed by Mayor Stone.
If a General Plan amendment were necessary to ensure the development of a park and ride on
the site of discussion, Councilman Naggar, echoed by Councilman Pratt, relayed his support of
the request. If the amendment were not necessary for the park and ride, Mr. Naggar relayed his
opposition to the amendment.
Mayor Stone as well relayed his support for a park and ride.
City Attorney'Thorson noted that the City Council must decide whether the site of discussion
should be designated as highway commercial or open space. If the open space designation
were determined, a resolution would need to be adopted by the City Council. If it were
determined to leave the designation at highway commercial, then the resolution before the City
Council should be adopted. Mr. Thorson noted that the park and dde issue should be treated as
a separate issue and reiterated that the park and ride, to his understanding, may be either
constructed on Planning Area 1 (of record) 2.
Since there is no urgency with regard to this matter, Mayor Stone suggested to continue the
matter and discuss the feasibility of constructing a park and ride in the area of discussion and if
not there, staff to determine other possible alternatives.
MOTION: Mayor Stone moved to continue this matter off calendar and to renotice the issue
when it is reagendized. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Comerchero and voice
vote reflected unanimous approval.
PA99-0371 - General Plan Amendment - Temecula Creek Villa(
MENDATION:
9.1 Rec~
Having met with th~
Naggar and h~
project with a
Subcommittee's verbal report and provide the
'icant, Mayor Pro Tem Comerchero advised 1
~e subcommittee which is recommendi
~its and the
Al this time, Mayor Stone o
Mr. Marasco, 12625 High Bluff Ddve
County had imposed an assessment on the
City zoning which, in turn, im
a downzoning, which now makes the.
therefore, it is being requested to
development of a
cial,
hearing.
)licant of the project, advised that the
' and, thereby, making an assumption of
ic factor on the property; that there was
istent with the zoning; and that,
3 the zoning map.
For Mayor Stone, Mr. advised that the subcommittee's~ommendation would, not
be a viable solution; t izing th~ property wou d be inconsis't~t with the County s
action; and, there~.,e 'thor exacerbate the problem. ~
Mr. Charles B~Christ( 444 West C Street, San Diego, Old Vail Partners,'"~quested
that his ~ of October 27, 2000, be incorporated into the record; stated tha{ the~'a.32
/e been taxed as commercial property from the time District No.159 was for"~l%d;
:onon ically viable solution must be approved; and that he would encourage ~.
of the request.
R:\Minutes\102400
13
SEPTEMBER 25, 2001
R:\G P A\PA99-0451\451PA99 CC4 8-27-02.doc
16
16 Rancho Hi.qh ands Ddve General Plan Amendment (Planninq Application N(~. PA99-0451)
RECOMMENDATION:
16.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 01-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA DENYING THE AMENDMENT OF THE GENERAL
PLAN LAND USE MAP FOR A LOCATION ON RANCHO
HIGHLANDS DRIVE IDENTIFIED AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL
NO. 944-330-019 (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 99-0451)
Planning Director Ubnoske reviewed the staff report (as per written material), highlighting the
Planning Commission's recommendation to deny the applicant's request to change the General
Plan Land Use Map of the area of discussion to Highway/Tourist Commercial.
At this time, Mayor Comerchero opened the public hearing.
By way of a map, Mr. Anthony Polo, Avalon Consultants, P.O. Box 2497, Temecula,
representing Global Hotel Network, advised that prior to the close of escrow, the current owner
had requested verification from the City of Temecula that the potential use of this site as a hotel
would be permissible since it is zoned Office Professional; that the current owner based his
decision to purchase the property on the information he had received from the City; that the plot
plan for the proposed hotel is now on hold; that two large pads have been graded (one acre in
sige); and that rather than consider this as an application request to change open space to
commercial use, which would increase traffic generation, he requested that the City Council
consider this application with the traffic generation approved under the original Specific Plan.
At this time, Mayor Comerchero closed the public hearing.
Although the Specific Plan is almost built out, Councilman Naggar noted that a Park and Ride
has been indicated in the Specific Plan but has not been built; questioned where a Park and
Ride could be built; and stated that, to his understanding, the property of discussion has been
assessed and taxes have been paid as if it ware commercial. In closing, Mr. Naggar noted that
he would not be prepared to vote on this matter.
Concurring with Councilman Naggar, Mayor Pre Tern Roberts questioned whether a one-acre
pad would be sufficient in size for a hotel and parking; as well questioned where the Park and
Ride would be built; and suggested that a traffic study be completed to determine the traffic
generation impacts on Ynez Road as a result of the construction of a hotel.
Councilman Pratt as well addressed the potential traffic impacts as a result of the construction
of a hotel.
Concurring with his fellow colleagues' comments, Mayor Comerchero supported a continuance
in order to further explore the matter as well as the formation of an ad hoc committee and
recommended that Councilman Naggar serve on that comm ttee.
R:'Wlin utes\Og2501
8
MOTION: Councilman Naggar moved to continue the matter for 60 days to the November 27,
2001, City Council meeting and to form an ad hoc committee to address the matter (to which
Councilman Naggar was appointed). The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Roberts and
voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Councilman Stone who was absent.
17
Staqe Road/CETAP Corridors
)MMENDATION:
17.1
Public Works
provided the staff report (of record).
City Council
Commission decision
being considered as
be considered as preferred
endorsement of the R
program to ensure proper
5A and 5B will
Comerchero, Mr.
City's part to ensure these
of the Riverside County Transit Commh
had unanimou..
alternatives and to em[:
reiterating that these alte~
,nty Transit Commission and
le. Because the alternati~
II associated a
the
infol
n earlier
~ from
'~ave the
g for such
part of a larger
Haley advised that corridors
In response to Mayor
measures necessary on the
as viable options.
Although appreciating Mr. Haley's
considered, Ms. Michelle Anderson,
been formed by the public (Citizens Against I
these alternatives will never be viewed as ~
viewed as not viable, why the
them.
~urance that these alternatives will not be
Street, advised that an organization has
~rhood Expressways) to further ensure that
Jestioned why if these alternatives are
monies on further studies regard to
Mr. Ed Dool, 28464
but expressed concern with the
as well
opposition to the expressway
Mr. Cad Ross,
City Council of these pote~
Count3
questioned why the the City had to apprise the
routes when Mayor Pro Tern as the Riverside
, noting that the City should have a
For Mayor Pro Tem I Mr. Haley commented on how Corridors
desig by the consultants, clarifying that the RCTC
directed ~ and stating that he as well as Mayor Pro Tern
the desi
5B were
endorsed nor
Relaying
provide
5B, Mayor Pro Tem Roberts requested
Lp to the City Council.
lltant
To E
route for the children who attend Abby Reinke Elementar,
MacDonald, 38925 Calle Breve, requested that a four-way stop at Juarez end
Roads be installed.
R:\Minutes\092501
9
ATTACHMENT NO. 6
INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY
R:~G P A\PA99-0451\451PA99 CC4 8-27-02.doc
17
City of Temecula
P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589-9033
Environmental Checklist
Project Title Planning Application PA99-0451 - Rancho Highlands Drive General
Plan Land Use Map Amendment
Lead Agency Name and Address City of Temecula
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
Contact Person and Phone Number David Hogan, Senior Planner
(909) 694-6400
Project Location West of Rancho Highlands Drive, immediately east of Interstate 15 in
the City of Temecula.
Project Sponsor's Name and Address
General Plan Designation
Zoning
Description of Project
Surrounding Land Uses and Setting
Other public agencies whose approval
~s required
City of Temecuia
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
Open Space
Specific Plan (SP-2)
Amend the General Plan Land Use Map for a portion of the Rancho
Highlands Specific Plan from Open Space to Highway Tourist
Commercial to correct a mapping error from the earlier adoption of the
General Plan.
The underlying Specific Plan land use and site development
requirements are not being changed by this amendment. Any future
development of the site will comply with the appropriate development
and environmental review requirements.
The site is located in the Rancho Highlands Specific Plan in an area
identified for urban scale development. The current adjacent land uses
are as follows:
North: Commercial (the Embassy Suites Hotel)
East: Vacant
South: Vacant
West: Interstate 15
None.
F:~Depts~P LANNING~CEQA~451PA99 lES.doc
1
Environmental Factors Potentially Affected
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact
that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.
Land Use Planning
Population and Housing
Geologic Problems
Water
Air Quality
Transportation/Cimulation
Biological Resources
Energy and M ners Resources
Utilities and Service Systems
Aesthetics
Hazards
Noise
Public Services
Cultural Resources
Recreation
Mandatory Findings of Significance
None
Determination
(To be completed by the lead agency)
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant on the environment, and a NEGATIVE
DECLARATION will be prepared
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not
be a significanteffect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by
A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required
I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant
unless mitigated~ impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in
an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation
measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a "potentially
significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
uired, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all
potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an ead;er EIR or NEGATIVE
DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to
that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are
ect, nothing further is required.
Signature Date
Pdnted name For
F:~Depts~PLANNING~CEQA~451PA99 lES,doc
2
1. Land Use and Planning. Would the project:
............................................... _ - .:~$auroe~ ......... = ...................................
a. Physically divide an established community?(3)
b. Conflict with applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation
of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (incJuding, but
not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal
program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of
avoiding or mitigation an environmental effect? (1)
c. Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or
netural community conservation plan? (2)
Comments:
The proposal is intended to correct a mapping error that occurred dudng the original General Plan process.
The site was inadvertently designated as open space when it was part of Planning Area No. 2. The Open
Space on the General Plan was, in Rancho Highlands Specific Plan, manufactured and landscaped slopes
that were intended to represent a transition area between future commercial and residential areas. The
Rancho Highlands Specific Plan did not identify any environmental resources that would be protected. The
project will not conflict with the applicable environmental plans or policies adopted by the agencies with
jurisdiction over the project. The project will not divide an established community. The site is located in
a commercial area between Rancho Highlands Drive and Interstate 15. There is no established community
on or near the site to be divided by this proposal. There are also no habitat conservation or natural
community conservation plans applicable to the site. Therefore, no significant impacts will result from the
proposed project.
2. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project:
a. Induce substantial population growth in an area, either ,,/
directly (for example, by proposing new homes and
businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension
of roads or other infrastructure)?
b. Dispi~,ce substantial numbers of existing housing,
necessity_ting the construction of replacement housing
elsewhere? (3)
c. Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the
construction of replacement housing elsewhere? (3)
Comments:
3. The project will not induce new population growth within the area and will not displace existing residential
structures or area residents. The project is the correction of a mapping error for a commercial zone within an
approved specific plan. As a result, no displacement impacts are associated with this proposal.
F:~Depts~PLANNING~CEQAN51PA99 lES.doc
3
3. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Wou. ld the project?
.... ' ................ :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: .............................. :~:
a. Expose people or structures to potential substantial
adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death
involving: (1,2,3)
i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on
the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning
Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based
on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to
Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42.
ii) Strong seismic ground shaking?
iii)Seismic-related ground failure~ including liquefaction?
iv) Landslides?
b. Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil?
c. Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or
that would become unstable as a result of the project,
and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral
spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? (3)
d. Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 1801-B
of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial
risks to life or property?
e. Have soil incapable of adequately supporting the use of
septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems
where sewers are not available for the disposal of
wastewater?
Comments:
The project is a General Plan Land Use Map correction and will not expose people or structures to potential
substantial adverse effects. Any specific development proposals will receive the appropriate environmental
review when the detailed project is ready for consideration. The General Plan identifies significant seismic
hazards near the project area. The General Plan EIR also identifies numerous mitigation measures that
will be applied when development occurs. These measures have the ability to reduce the impacts from
vadous seismic-related hazards. The project (a General Plan Land Use Map correction) has no potential
for soil subsidence and slope instability. In addition, no onsite waste disposal is being proposed. As a
result, no significant effects ara anticipated as a result of this project.
4. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project:
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::~[::[ :~:~ ;~:hi~i~Potemial¥!!i!!i! !!!![!:::!:::!::i:[ii:!!!~i!::i !ii:!!]!!!::::::::
:::::::::~:~: ~l~:.~:.~:. ~;~:.:.~: ~1~
a. Violate any water quali~ standards or waste dis~arge V
requirement?
b. Subs~n~ally deplete groundwater supplies or intedere ~
subsmn~ally ~ groundwater re~arge su~ that ~ere
would be a net defidt in aquifer volume or a lowering of
· e Io~1 groundwater ~ble level (e.g., ~e produ~on rate
of preexisting nea~y wells would drop to a level whi~
would not suppo~ existing land uses or planned uses for
F:~DepCs~PLANN ING~CEQA~4SI PA99 lES.doc
which permits have been granted)? (2)
c. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattem of the site
or area, including through the alteration of the course of a
stream or dver, in a manner which would result in
substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? (3)
d. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site
or area, including through the alteration of the course of a
stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount
of sudace runoff in a manner which would result in flooding
on- or off-site? (3)
e. Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the
capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage
systems or provide substantial additional sources of
polluted runoff?
f. Otherwise substantially degrade water quality?
g. Place housing within a lO0-year flood hazard area as
mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood
Insurenca Rate Map or other flood hazald delineation map?
(4)
h. Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures
which would impede or redirect flood flows? (4)
i. Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss,
injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a
result of the failure of a levee or dam? (4)
j. Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? (2,4)
Comments:
The proposed amendment will not alter or impact physical areas where flood hazards have been identified
within the City's boundaries and will not effect water quantity or quality. As a result, no significant impact
have been identified.
5. AIR QUALITY. Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable quality
management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following
determinations. Would the project:
i~i::i'::::ii::i~iii::::~i~: ~ii~i:: ~ ii:~ ':~ '"''i' i
~ ~ ~:!:~:~i: ii:i?i:~:i:~:i~:~:~:~:!:!:!i:!:~i::~i::~ :~ :i = ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::iliP~i~::ii::i
::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :[::: ::: :?:i: ~:;i::i :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
a. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable
air quality plan? (1,2)
b. Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially
to an existing or projected air quality violation?
c. Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any
criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-
attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient
air quality standard (including releasing emissions which
exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors?
d. Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant
concentrations?
e. Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number
of people? (2)
F:~Dep~s~P LANNING~CEQA~451 PA99 lES.doc
5
Comments:
5. The proposed amendment, a mapping error correction to the General Plan Land Use Map, will not alter or
effect air quality. As a msult,'no significant impacts have been identified.
' 6. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project:
a. Cause an ;,~ase in ba;~c whi~ is substantial in
relation to ~e existing traffic load and ~pacl~ of ~e
sffeet system (i.e., result in a subs~nfial in,ease in
eider ~e number of vehicle ~ps, ~e volume to ~pad~
milo on marls, or ~ngesfion at inteme~ions? (2)
b. F~d, eider individually or ~mulafively, a level of
se~i~ s~nda~ es~blished by ~e ~un~ ~ngesfion
management agen~ for designated roads or highways?
c. Result in a Q~a.ge in air traffic pa~ems, including either
an in=ease in ~ffic levels or a ~ange in Io~fion ~at
msul~ in subs~nfial s~e~ ~sks?
d. Su~.~ally in=ease h~rds due to a design feature
(e.g., s~ ~es or dangerous inteme~ions) or
~n~mpatible uses (e.g., fa~ equipment)?
e. Result in inadequate eme~en~ access?
[ Result in inadequate pa~ing ~paci~
g. Confli~ ~ a~up[~ polities, plans, or programs
suppo~ng altema~ve ~nspo~tion (e.g., bus turnouts,
bi,de m~s? (1)
Comments:
6. Any potential impacts associated with this project have been addressed through the EIR for the cltywide
General Plan that evaluated the cumulative traffic impacts of all development in the City. In addition, the
EIR for the Rancho Highlands Specific Plan also discussed the impacts of the entire Specific Plan area
(including this site). As a result, no significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES: Would the project:
a. Have a subs~nfial adverse effe~ e~er direly or .....
·mugh habi~t motivations, on any spe~es idenfifi~
as a ~ndidate, sensitive, or special s~tus spedes in
Io~1 or mgio~l plans, polities, or regulations, or by the
California Depa~ent of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and
~ldl~e Se~i~? (2)
b. Have a subs~nfial adverse effe~ on any dpadan habi~t
or o~er sensitive natural ~mmuni~ identified in Io~1 or
mgionaJ plans, polities, and regulations or by ~e
California Depa~ent of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and
~ldl~e Se~i~? (2)
F:~eP~P LANNING~CEQA~451 PA99 IES.;Ioc
c. Have a subs;a~;;al adverse effect of federally protected
' wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water
ACt (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool,
coastal, etc.) through direct' removal, filing, hydrological
intern~ption, or other means?
d. Interfere substantially with the movement of any native
resident or migrato~ fish or wildlife species or with
established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors,
or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? (2,3)
e. Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting
biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or
ordinance?
f. Conflict with the provisions of an adopted habitat
Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation
Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat
conservation plan?
Comments:
7 The site has already been graded and disturbed and contains no identifiable biologic resources. Pdor to
the approval of any detailed development proposal, the potential impacts to on site biologic resources will
be evaluated. As a result, no impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
8. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
a. Result in ~e loss of availabili~ of a ~o~ mineral
msou~ ~at would be of value to the region and ~e
msiden~ of ~e sam? (1,2)
b. Result in ~e loss of availabili~ of a Io~lly-impo~nt
mineral msour~ re~ve~ site delineated on a Io~1
general plan, specific plan or other land use plan?
Comments:
The project is a General Plan Land Use Map correction and will not impact mineral resources, in addition,
no mineral resources have been identified on the site. As a result, no impacts are anficlpatad as a result
of this project.
9. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project:
a. Create a sign~ca~,;, hazard to the public or the
environment through the routine transportation, use, or
disposal of hazardous materials?
b. Crate a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and
accident conditions involving the release of hazardous
materials into the environment?
F:~epts~P LANNING~CEQAN51 PA99 lES.doc
7
c. Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or
acutely hn:'nrdous materials, substances, or acutely
h~Tnrdous materials, substances, or waste within one-
quarter mile of an existing Or proposed school?
d. Be located on a site which is included on a list of
hnTnrdous materials sites compiled pursuant to
Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result,
would it create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment?
e. For a project located within an airport land use plan or, NA
where such a plan has not bean adopted, within two
miles or a public airport or public use airport, would the
project result in a safety hazard for people residing or
working in the project area? (1)
f. For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would NA
the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or
working in the project area?(1)
g. Impair implemer,',~;;on of or physically interfere with an
adopted emergency response plan or emergency
evacuation plan?
h. Expose people or structures to a significant dsk or loss,
,njunj or death involving wildland fires, including where
wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where
residences are intermixed with wildlands?
Comments:
9.a-d. The proposed amendment, a mapping error correction to the General Plan Land Use Map will not create
a public hazard or result in a the discharge of h~ardous material. The project is not located in a location
that would block or interfere with an emergency response plan. As a result, no significant impacts have
been identified.
9.e,f
9.g,h
The project is not located within the Airport Influence Area of the French Valley Airport, the closest airport
to the project site. Therefore, no significant impacts are possible.
The site is also not expected to be affected by wildland fires. The site is located in an urban area, and
Interstate 15 is between this site and the closest wildland fire area. As a result, no significant impacts have
been identified.
10. NOISE. Would the project result in:
a. Exposure of people to severe noise levels in excess of
standards established in the Jocal general plan or noise
ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies?
(1,2)
b. Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive
groundbome vibration or gmundbome noise levels? (1,2)
c. A s~,$~antial permanent increase in ambient noise levels
in the project vicinity above levels existing without the
project? (1,2)
:.EQA~451 PA99 lES,doc
8
d. A substantial temporary or pedodic increase in ambient ,/'
noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing
without the project? (1,2)
e. For a project ~oca~ed within an airport land use plan or, NA
where such a plan has not been adopted, within two
miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the
project expose people residing or working in the project
area to excessive noise levels?
f. For a project within the vicinity of a pdvate airstrip, would NA
the project expose people residing or working in the
project area to excessive noise levels? I
Comments:
10.
The project, a General Plan Land Use Map mapping error will not result in any noise impacts. Any future
development on the site will consider these factors pdor to any approval. The project is not located within
the Airport Influence Area of the French Valley Airport, the closest airport to the project site. As a result,
no significant impacts have been identified.
11. PUBUC SERVICES: Would the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or
altered Government services in any of the following areas:
=:i:iii~ii := :: ~=:~iii~:? i i i ~?ii i ii~:i i?i~ !i~ i i ii i ii i?i~?~i~ i iiiiii ii ii!!ili ilil i '"" '" "' 'ii.i ............................................
a. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical
impacts associates with the provisions of new or physically
altered govemmental facilities, need for new or physically
altered govemmental facilities, the construction of which
could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to
maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other
perl:ormanca objectives for any of the public services? (1,2)
b. Fire protection?
c. Police protection?
d. Schools?
e. Parks?
f. Other public facilities?
Comments:
11'
The project, a General Plan Land Use Map mapping error will not result in any impacts to public services.
Any future development on the site will consider these factors pdor to any approval. As a result, no impacts
have been_dentified.
12. UTlUTIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS: Would the project:
a. Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the
applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board?
b. Require or result in the construction of new water or
wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing
facilities, the construction of which could cause significant
F:~Dep~s~PLANNING~CEQA~451 PA99 lES.doc
9
environmental effects? '--
c. Require or result in the co~st, uction of new storm water
drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the
construction of which could ~ause significant
environmental effects?
d. Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the
project from existing entitlements and resources, or are
new or expanded entitlements needed?
e. Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment
provider which serves or may serve the project that it has
adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand
in addition to the provider's existing commitments?
f. Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to
accommodate the project's solid w~$!e disposal needs?
g. Comply with federal, sta[=, and local statutes and
regulations related to solid waste?
Comments:
12.
The project, a General Plan Land Use Map mapping error will not result in any impacts to public services.
Any future development on the site will consider these factors prior to any approval. As a result, no impacts
have been identified.
13. AESTHETICS. Would the project:
a. Have a sub~,~al adveme effe~ on a scenic vista?
b. Su~fially damage s~nic msoumes, including, b~ not
limited to, ~es, m~ out=opping, and historic building
~in a s~ s~nic highwa~
c. Sabs[=~,~ally degrade ~e existing visual ~am~er or
quali~ of ~e site and its suffoundings?
d. Create a new sour~ of subs[=.[ial light or glare whi~
would advemely affe~ day or nighffime views in ~e
ama?
Comments:
13. The project, a General Plan Land Use Map mapping error will not result in any direct aesthetic impacts.
Any future development will need to comply with the Development Code and Design Guidelines that require
site landscaping and higher quality architectural design. Any future development on the site will consider
these factors prior to any approval. As a result, no impacts have been identified.
14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
a. I Cause a s,.bs~,,,~ial adverse change in the significance of ~/
a historical resource as defined in Section 1506.57
F:~Dep~'~P LANN ING~CE QAN5 ! PA99 IES.do~
t0
b. C=-.e a subsOilS;al adverse c~ha~,ge in the significance of
an archaeological resource pursuant to Section 1506.57
c. Directly or indirectly de~,uy a unique paleontological
resource or site or unique geologic feature?
d. Disturb any human remains, including those interred
outside of formal cemeteries?
Comments:
14.
The project, a General Plan Land Use Map mapping error will not result in any impacts to cultural
resources. Any future development on the site will consider these factors prior to any approval. As a
result, no impacts have been identified.
15. RECREATION. Would the project:
iii~i~i:!ii~!i:~!~:~::~``~i~i~?~:~i~`~i~!~i~:~:~ ~i~ ii :: .... ~: ¥:~::~: :~::: ........................
a. Would ~e pmje~ in.ease ~e use of existing
neigh~o~ ~d ~ional pa~s or o~er m~eefional
fa~lifies su~ ~at subs~nfial physi~l deterioration
fa~li~ would o~r or be a~lemted?
b. Does ~e pmje~ in~ude re~eafional fa~lities or
· e ~ns~on or expansion of re~eafional fa~lifies
~i~ might have an adverse physi~l effe~ on
envimnmen~
Comments:
15.
The project, a General Plan Land Use Map mapping error will not result in any impacts to recreational
facilities. Any future development on the site will consider these factors pdor to any approval. As a resu~
no impacts have been identified.
16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
a. Does ~e pmje~ have ~e potential ~ d~mde ~e quali~
of ~e envimnmenL subs~ntially r~u~ ~e ~bi~ ~ a fi~
or ~ldl~ s~es, ~use a fi~ or ~ldl~e popu~ ~ dr~
below se~-~ing levels, ~m~en ~ elimin~e a pla~ or
animal ~mmuni~, mdu~ ~e number ~ restd~ ~e range
of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate
impo~nt e~mples of ~e major pedods of Califomia
histo~ or pmhisto~
b. Does ~e p~je~ have impa~ ~at are i~ividually limited,
but ~mulafively ~nsiderable? ('Cumulatively
~nsidemble' means ~at ~e in~emen~l effems of a
proje~ are ~nsidemble ~en viewed in ~nne~on wi~
· e effe~ ~ past pmje~s, ~e effe~s of o~er ~ffent
proje~, and ~e effe~s of probable future pmje~?
F:~Dep~P LANNING~CEQA~I51 PA99 lES.doc
11
Does the project have envirenm=.~al effects which will
cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either
directly or indirectly?
Comments:
16,
The project, a General Plan Land Use Map mapping error will not effect the environment or other important
statewide resources.
17. EARLIER ANALYSES.
Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or
more effects have been adequately analyzed in an eadier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D).
In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets.
a. Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review.
b. Imp~_~_~ adequately addressed. Identify which affects from the above check list were within the scope
of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state
whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis.
c. Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated,"
describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and
the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project.
17.
This project, a General Plan Land Use Map mapping error, does not effect the previous analysis undertaken
for the Rancho Highlands Specific Plan and the City General Plan. This proposal is consistent with both
documents because the City General Plan was developed to incorporate the approved Specific Plan. In
addition, the City zoning map indicates that the project area is zoned Specific Plan. As a result, the
proposal is consistent with all previous analyses.
2.
3.
4.
SOURCES
City of Temecula General Plan.
City of Temecula General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report.
Rancho Highlands Specific Plan and EIR.
FEMA Flood Map: Map No. 060742 0005 B.
FN:)ePts~PLANNING~CEQA~I51 PA99 lES,doc
ITEM 12
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANC,~._/'~.-.~
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
Jim O'Grady, Assistant City Manager
August 27, 2002
Update on Research Related to Formation of Municipal Utility
PREPARED BY:
Aaron Adams, Sr. Management Analyst
RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file this background report. The Electrical
Subcommittee members (Councilmembers Naggar & Comerchero) will provide their perspective
and recommendations on this information.
BACKGROUND: Based on direction received from the' City Council at the June 11, 2002
City Council meeting, staff was asked to follow up on several items relating to the possible
formation of a municipal utility.
In conjunction with the Electrical Subcommittee of Councilmember Comerchero and
Councilmember Naggar, staff was directed to accomplish the following tasks:
Obtain information from alternative cities which have analysis regarding the
formation of a utility
Staff has contacted a number of California Cities .who are at various levels of
commitment or who have expressed some degree of desire to form their own
municipal utility. Provided under separate cover due to the voluminous nature, was
background information and an executive summary of the status and findings of a
dozen California Cities. Many of these jurisdictions have taken the first step towards
forming a municipal utility that involves the City Council passing an ordinance
declaring the intent to form a Municipal Utility..The creation of such an ordinance
does not commit the City to go forward with implementation of a municipal utility, but
is a necessary step should the City proceed with establishing a utility at any time in
the future. Other cities have retained an electrical consultant and/or are in the
process of having a feasibility study performed to determine if operation of a
municipal electrical utility makes good financial sense. The final decision to create
and fully implement a public utility should be based upon these findings of an
extensive economic and technical public policy analysis.
In the deregulation environment, the cities listed below have passed ordinances and
resolutions to authorize the formation of a municipal utility:
Apple Valley Greenfield
Chino Hills Hemet
Chula Vista Corona
Rancho Cucamonga
Santa Clarita
Hercules
R:~ADAMSA\COUNCIL\Mu~iopal Utility staff reporl doc
San Marcos Davis King City
Sigt~al Hill Diamond Bar Moreno Valley
Soledad Gonzales Palm Springs
Victorville
In addition, 38 publicly owned electric and gas utilities operate in California with
nearly 3 million customers, or 25 percent of the electric load. Public electric utilities
in California include:
Alameda Burbank
Anaheim Coalinga
Anza Colton
Azusa Glendale
Banning Gridley
Biggs Healdsburg
Long Beach Redding
Merced Irrig. Dist. Riverside
Modesto Irrig. Dist. Roseville
Needles Sacramento MUD
Palo Alto Shasta Lake
Pasadena Silicon Valley Electric
Plumas-Sierra Surprise Valley
Hetch Hetchy W & P
Imperial Irrig. Dist
Lassen MUD
Lodi
Lompoc
LA DWP
Toulumne County
Trinity County PUD
Truckee Donner PUD
Turlock Irrigation Dist.
Ukiah
Vernon
The Electrical Subcommittee also requested information from Southern California
Edison (SCE) regarding the valuation and return from distribution facilities. These
questions and SOE's responses are attached.
Provide third party providers with the necessary information to create a no-
cost financial model
The Electrical Subcommittee and City staff met with ENCO Utility Services (formerly
Edison Utility Services) in late July to further research possible formation of a utility
business. ENCO was once a sister company of Southern California Edison, but was
sold off by parent company Edison International about 18 months ago. ENCO now
currently employs 12 employees and several temporary/project employees and has a
Senior Management Team consisting of (4) individuals. This team aims to combine
development experience and real estate capital underwriting and investment
strengths with expertise in delivering utility services. (Attached is background
information on ENCO Utility Services)
ENCO prepared a financial model for the City of Temecula that hypothetically
demonstrated what the financial outlook would be in forming a municipal utility
through two scenarios that involved a 30-year commitment. In one scenario, the City
would receive 25% of the net district revenue estimated at $77 million dollars over
the entire term of 30 years. This scenario does not require an initial investment on
the City's part as ENCO pays $12.5 million in capital costs. In the other scenario, the
City receives 50% of the district revenue estimated at $154 million dollars over 30
years. This scenario, however; assumes the City pays the $12.5 million in capital
costs which involve the purchase of substations. ENCO has stated an option for the
City to consider could begin with scenario #1 (25/75) and use the capital provided by
ENCO to pay for substations and graduate to the 50/50 model paying back the initiat
investment. In these scenarios, revenue to the City is small in the first few years and
rises thereafter as the number of customers increase.
R:'~,DAMSA\COUNCIL\Munidoal UI]lity staffreport.doc
Staff has not conducted an independent review of the financial model. If the Council
felt there were merits in further exploring this, staff would strongly recommend that
an independent review be performed to better understand the financial impacts
associated with the formation of a municipal utility and that competitive proposals be
solicited. As an example, the City of Chino conducted a Pre-Prefeasibility Study at a
cost of $22,000, it is roughly estimated that an independent review will range
between $20,000-$25,000. Additional consulting costs could be expected if this very
preliminary study indicated that such an approach seemed feasible.
Provide all collected data to the City Council and to Southern California Edison
within 60 days
This information is being provided to the City Council for consideration at your
meeting of August 27, 2002. A copy of this information is also being provided to
Southern California Edison.
FISCAL IMPACT: None at this time.
Attached:
Executive Summary of Staff Research of other Municipalities
Southern California Edison Correspondence
ENCO Utility Services Company Information
R:~DAMSA\COUNCIL\Municipal Uality staff report aoc
Mary Drury
Region Manager
July 31, 2002
The Honorable Mike Naggar
The Honorable Jeff Comerebem
City Council Members &
Members of City's Electric Subcommittee
City of Temecula
43200 Business Park Drive
Temeeula,. CA 92590
Dear Honorable Council Members:
Your letter of July 5, 2002, poses a number of questions concerning the value, revenues
and other related utility financing mechanisms for Southern California Edison Co. (SCE)
relating to our electric distribution system infras~cture. In responding to your letter,
there are two phrases used in Question 1 that could create confusion.
Question #1': What is the fair market value of the infrastructure that has been given
to Edison within Temecula's City limits since 19897
SCE is unclear why the City would want a "fair market value" of SCE's existing
system. Staffhas informed us that the City is just exploring options relating to
municipal electric service for new development areas. The "fair market value"figure
of existing assets, however, would only be relevant to a take over Of SCE's existing
facilities serving existing loads. In addition, to determine the fair market value of any
portion of the infrastructure on its system would require SCE to undertake a special
time-consuming and cosily study, a cost to SCE and its ratepaycrs that SCE is not
willing to undertake. Therefore, we believe that this request should be a topic of
discussion at a follow-up meeting.
Alsoi SCE is .unclear what is meant by the phrase ",.infrastructure that has been
given to Edison..," Therefore, our responses are based on what we believe this phase
mean~ and are carried throughout the information we are providing for all the
questions.
The provision of service to new developments is governed by SCE's CPUC-hpproved
line extension rules (generally, Rule 15). These rules require that some of the new
facilities (e.g. trenching, most conduits, and backfill) are the cost responsibility of the
project developer and other facilities (e.g. cables, transformers, most substructures,
and switches) are the cost responsibility of SCE, provided that the anticipated '
distribution revenues support the installation cost. The costs that SCE is responsible
36100CathedmlCanyon
Cathedral Citg CA 92234
760-202-425t
Fax 760-202-4136
for are typically much larger than the.costs of the facilities that the project developer
is responsible for. At project completion, the.developer is required to deed to SCE
the facilities it has cost responsibility for and We assume this is what you refer to in
this question.' Although there are noTM many options for who designs and installs
distribution facilities to serve new developments and refundable deposits may be
required for certain projects, the cost responsibilit)~ perspective of these basic
principles will always apply.
BeCause of the complexity of line extension roles and several important changes to
them in recent years, we would appreciate the oppommity to discuss this issue in
more detail in a follow-up meeting.
Question 02: How much money has Edison been allowed as its return on investment
for that infrastructure?
SCE earns no return on facilities deeded to it. SCE earns a CPUC-authorized return
(presently 9.49%) on what it has in rate base. In simple terms, rate base comprises
those assets and amounts for which SCE itself paid, less depreciation, and it
does not include assets contributed by a third party.
Question #3: How much in additional revenue was Edison given with the
infrastructure?
We are uncertain what is meant by this question but there is no net additional revenue
from these assets. We have assumed you may be referring to the ITCC tax paid
by the developer when it deeds facilities to SCE. This tax applies only to those
facilities for which the developer has cost responsibility (see Question 1 for
for a description of these facilities), and is remitted to the appropriate taxing
authorities. These figures are not currently available city-by-city and
cannot be provided.
Question 04: How much has Edison profited from ownership of that infrastructure
and how much has Edison profited from selling electricity through that
infrastructure?
Again; SCE earns no return-- therefore no additional profit - on infrastructure assets
installed by others.
Question #5: How much does Edison figure it wffi make from ownership of that
infrastructure over the next thirty years?
Nothing. See the answer given in Question 2.
" 2
Question 06: How much does Edison think the infrastructure will be worth between
now and build out? How much does Edison stand to profit from ownership of the .
new infrastructure, after it hnsbeen given them, over the next thirty years? How
much does Edison think it will make selling electricity over the new infrastrneture
over the next thirty years? How much does the'PUC allow as return on investment
for infrastructure? ·
SCE cannot estimate today what the fair market value of these, or any other, facilities
will be at a particular point in the future.
In its other respects, the question appears to duplicate the earlier questions.
Question 07: How much more in maintenance fees will Edison charge for new
infrastructure over the next thirty years than the actual cost of maintaining that
infrast~ructure?
SCE's operations and maintenance (O&M) costs of maintaining its distxibution system
to recover O&M costs.are not determined with specific reference to any particular
facilities, but are approved by the CPUC on a system-wide, or system-average, basis.
SCE is also responsible for O&M costs on facilities installed by others and, thereafter,
deeded over to it. The actual costs of operating and maintaining a given portion of the
distribution system are dependent on many factors and could be higher or lower than
the mount of O&M costs collected from a specific group of cnstomers.
As stated above, it is our understanding that the City of Temecula goal is to explore
energy options available to them for new development areas, not full municipalization
through a litigated takeover of the entire SCE system serving the city. If this
understanding is correct, the questions you have asked in your letter may be of interest to
you, but do not provide the infommtion that is much more critical to an economic
feasibility analysis should the City decide to move forward as a municipal utility for these
new development areas. The areas of concern for this type of endeavor we believe are:
· Temecula's source of generation and at what cost
Purchasing the electricity commodity represents the most significant cost and risk related
to providing electric utility service. Although the energy crisis ha~ passed, the future
cost and availability of new generation remalna uncertain and should be the primary
concern of any potential new utility.
In February 2002, the City of Chino Hills recognized this and withdrew their study of
providing municipal service to new development areas. In the fail of 2001, Barrett-
American Homes commissioned a study for a project within the City of Perris, with
'results verified by an independent third-party. While the study was never released to
either the council or the public, SCE believes that the developer determined that buying
generation for such a small project in a potentially volatile market did not make economic
sense. Shortly afrer this study was completed, the developer contacted us requesting that
3
we begin the design and, subsequently, the installation work, rather than aSking the City
of Perris to move forward to become a municipal utility to serve this project.
In addition to evaluating the cost and availability of new generation, the City should also
consider there might be various nonbypassable surcharges imposed, even aRer a
municipalization. The CPUC has identified the historical costs incurred by California
Department of Water Resources (CDWR) in 2001 during the elec~city crisis. The
uneconomic costs of both the long-term CDWR contracts and the existing qualifying
facility (QF) costs may be non-bypassable charges that the city would still be responsible
for paying, even after a municipalization. In vetoing AB 206 in 2001, Governor Davis
stated, "The state has incurred costs of approximately $10 billion to keep the lights on
and must sell revenue bonds to reimburse taxpayers for those expenditures. Any new
municipal utility district must be sUuctured in a way to bear its fair share of those costs."
· Interconnection with the state grid structure:
SCE provides interconnection services to municipal utilities pursuant to its FERC-
jurisdictional Wholesale Distribution Access Tariff (WDAT). Actual transmission of
wholesale power is subject to FERC-approved tariffs of the California Independent
System Operator. Two factors need to be considered regarding this matter. First is the
scattered nature of the new development areas within the City of Temecula, which
probably wilinot lend themselves to a single point of interconnection to the SCE grid
system. As such, interconnection studies.may have to be performed for more thar~ one of
these developments to alert,mine the impact on the existing SCE system and how the
City's system must be engineered to interconnect. All the costs involved with these
studies, with the use of existing infrash'ugture and the construction of any required new
infrastructure to complete any such intercoanecfion must be borne by the City. It is
impossible to advise what the range of these costs may be until such time aS the City
officially makes an application.
The second item'to consider is that having a municipal utility may not shield a City and
its customers from rotating outages. As an electric utility, the City of Temecula may be
required to be a member of the California Independent System Operator (CA-ISO). CA-
ISO may require an agreement for "load shedding" when an emergency is called,
depending on what generation arrangements a municipal utility has in place. The City
may have'to develop a management plan for this requirement.
FInancing and utility valuations:
It would be erroneous for the City of Temecula to compare municipal utility financing,
invesunents and valuations with that of a private utility such aS SCE, or older, long-
standing municipal utilities such aS Riverside, Anaheira and LADWP. This comparison
Could create a skewed analogy became a new utility of today is subject to many
influences and conditions that are different than that of existing integrated utilities
including the cost of acquiring new energy supply.
TheTM are many other issues that should be considered as the City pr0eeeds with its
energy options evaluation. As indicated to. Staff, we are happy to work with you to help
you understand some Of the issuasin the utility industry as a whole as well as some of
those unique to the City of Temecula. We would like. to schedule a meeting with the
Energy-Sllbc~ommittee and staffto expand on some of these questions and to help clarify
the information you are trying to understandl
ROBERT LOPEZ
Region Manager
Public Affairs
EncloSure: Rule 15
Sou*hem California Edison
Rosemead, California
Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No. 24684-E
Cancelling Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No. 22978-E
Rule 15
DISTRIBUTION LINE EXTENSIONS
Sheet 1
APPLICABILITY:
This role is applicable to extension of electric Distribution Lines-lj of SCE's standard voltages (less than
50 kV) necessary to furnish permanent electric service to Applicants, and will be made in accordance
with the following provisions:
A. GENERAL
I. DISTRIBUTION LINE EXTENSION BASIS
DESIGN. SCE will be responsible for planning, designing, and engineering
Distribution Line Extensions using SCE's standards for material, design, and
construction. Applicant may elect to design *hat portion of the new Distribution
Une Extension normally designed by SCE in accordance wi*h *he applicant
design provisions of*his role.
OWNERSHIP. The Distribution Line Extension facilities installed under the
provisions of this role,, shall be owned, operated, and maintained by SCE,
except for Substructures and enclosures that are on, under, within, or part of
a building or structure.
PRIVATE LINES. SCE shall not' be required to serve any Applicant from
Dist~bution Une Extension facilities that are not owned, operated, and
maintained by SCE.
DISTRIBUTION LINE EXTENSION LOCATIONS
RIGHTS OF WAY. SCE will own, operate and maintain Distribution Line
Extension facilities only:.
(1)
along public streets, alleys, roads, highways and other publicly
dedicated ways and places which SCE has the legal right to occupy
(Franchise Areas), and
(2)
on public lands and private property across which dghta of way and
permits satisfactory to SCE may be obtained without cost to or
condemnation by SCE.
NORMAL ROUTE OF LINE. The length and normal mute of a Distribution
Line Extension will be determined by SCE and considered as the distance
along the shortest, most practical, available, and acceptable route which is
clear of obstructions from SCE's nearest permanent and available distribution
facility to the point from which the service facilities will be connected.
1_/Certain words beginning with capital letters are defined either within the provisions of this rule or in Section J.
(Continued)
(To be inserted by utility) Issued by (To be inserted by Cal. PUC)
Advice 1309-E John R. Fielder Date Filed May 4, 1998
Decision 97-12-099 SeniorVice President Effective Jul 1, 1998
~c~ Resolution
EDISON
Southern California Edison
Rosemead, California
Revised
Cancelling Revised
Cal. PUC Sheet No. 24685-E*
Cal. PUC Sheet No. 22979-E
A. GENERAL. (Continued)
Rule 15
DISTRIBUTION LINE EXTENSION,~
(Continued)
3. UNDERGROUND DISTRIBUTION LINE EXTENSIONS
Sheet 2
UNDERGROUND REQUIRED. Underground Distribution Line Extensions shall
be installed where required to comply with applicable laws and ordinances or
similar requiramen~s of governmental authorities having jurisdiction and where
SCE maintains or desires to maintain underground distribution facilities. For
example, underground Distribution Line Extensions are required for all new: (1)
Residential Subdivisions (except as provided for in Section H), (2) Residential
Developments, (3) Commercial Developments, (4) Industrial Developments,
and (5) locations lhat ara in proximity to and visible f~om designated Scenic
Areas. ·
UNDERGROUND OPTIONAL. When requested by Applicant and agreed upon
by SCE, underground Distribution Line Extensions may be installed in areas
whera it is not required, as provided in Section A.3.a.
OVERHEAD DISTRIBUTION LINE EXTENSIONS. Overhead Distribution Line
Extensions may be installed only where underground extensions are not required as
provided in Section A.3.a.
SPECIAL OR ADDED FACILITIES. Any special or added facilities SCE agrees to install
at the request of Applicant will be installed at Applicant's expense in accordance with
Rule 2, Description of Service.
TEMPORARY SERVICE. Facilities installed for temporary sen/ice or for operations of
speculative character or questionable permanency shall be made in accordance with the
fundamental installation and ownership provisions of this rule, except that all charges
and refunds shall be made under the provisions of Rule 13, Temporary Service.
SERVICES. Service facilities connected to the Distribution Lines to serve an Applicent's
premises wiJl be installed, owned and maintained as provided in Rule 16, Sen/ice
Extensions.
CONVERSIONS OF OVERHEAD TO UNDERGROUND. The replacement of existing
overhead Distribution LJnes with underground Distribution Lines will be made in
accordance with Rule 20, Replacement of Overhead With Underground Electric
Facilities.
STREET LIGHTS. SITeet lights and appurtenant facilities Shall be installed in
accordance with the service provisions of the applicable street light schedule.
(Continued)
(To be inserted by utility)
Advice 1309-E
Decision 97-12-098
2Cf
Issued by
John R. Fielder
Senior Vice President
(To beinserted byCal. PUC)
Date Filed Ma¥4,1998
Effective Jul1, 1998
Resolution
EDISON
$outhem California Edison
Rosemead, California
Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No. 24686-E
Cancelling Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No. 22980-E
Rule 15
DISTRIBUTION LINE EXTENSION~
Sheet 3
(Continued)
A. GENERAL. (Continued)
10.
CONTRACTS. Each Applicant requesting a Distribution Line Extension may be required
to execute a written contract(s), pdor to SCE performing its work on the Distribution Line
Extension. Such contracts shall be in the form .on file with the California Public Utilities
Commission (Commission).
B. INSTALLATION RESPONSIBILITIES
1. UNDERGROUND DISTRIBUTION LINE EXTENSIONS
APPLICANT RESPONSIBILITY. In accordance with SCE's design,
specifications, and requirements, Applicant is responsible for.
(1)
EXCAVATION. All necessary trenching, backfilling, and other digging
as required;
(2)
SUBSTRUCTURES AND CONDUITS. Furnishing, installing, and upon
acceptance by SCE, conveying to SCE ownership of all necessary
installed Substructures and Conduits, including Feeder Conduits and
related Substructures required to extend to and wibhin subdivisions and
developments; and
(3)
PROTECTIVE STRUCTURES. Fumishing, installing, and upon
acceptance by SCE, conveying to SCE ownership of a~l necessary
Protective Sb'uctures. '
SCE RESPONSIBILITY. SCE is responsible for furnishing and installing cables,
switches, transformers, and other disttibution facilities required to complete the
Distribution Line Extension.
OVERHEAD DISTRIBUTION LINE EXTENSIONS. SCE is responsible for furnishing
and installing all facilities required for the Distribution Pole Line Extension.
3. INSTALLATION OPTIONS
SCE-PERFORMED WORK. Where requested by Applicant and mutually
agreed upon, SCE may perform that portfon of the new Distribution line
Extension work normally installed by Applicant according to Section B.l.a.,
provided Applicant pays SCE its total estimated installed cost.
APPLICANT-PERFORMED WORK. Applicant may elect to install that portion of
the new Distribution Line Extension normally installed by SCE in accordance
with SCE design and specifications, using qualified contractors. (See
Section G, Applicant-Installation Options).
(Continued)
(To be inserted by utility)
Advice 1309-E
Decision 97-12-098
Issued by
John R. Fielder
Senior Vice President
(To be inserted by Cai. PUC)
Date Filed Ma),4, 1998
EffeCtive Jul 1, 1998
Resolution
EDISON
Southem California Edison
Rosemead, Galifomia
Revised
Cancelling Revised
Cal. PUC Sheet No. 27141-E
Cal. PUC Sheet No. 24687-E
Co
Rule 15
DISTRIBUTION LINE EXTENSION,~
(Continued)
DISTRIBUTION LINE EXTENSION ALLOWANCES
Sheet 4
GENERAL. SCE will complete a Distribution Une Extension without charge provided
SCE's total estimated installed cost does not exceed the allowances from permanent,
bona-fide loads to be sewed by lhe Distribution Line Extension within a reasonable time,
as determined by SCE. The allowance will first be applied to the Service Extension in
accordance with Rule 16. Any excess allowance will be applied to the Distribution Line
Extension to which the Service Extension is connected.
BASIS OF ALLOWANCES. Allowances shall be granted to an Applicant for Permanent
Service, or to an Applicant for a subdivision or development under the following
conditions:
SCE is provided evidence that construction will proceed promptly and financ ng
is adequate, and
Applicant has submitted evidence of building permit(s) or fully-executed home
purchase contract(s) or lease agreement(s), or
Where there is equivalent ev!dence of occupancy or electric usage satisfactory
to SCE.
The allowances in Sections C.3 and C.4 are based on a revenue-supported
methodology using the following formula:
ALLOWANCE = NET REVENUE
COST OF SERVICE FACTOR
RESIDENTIAL ALLOWANCES. The allowance for Distribution Line Extensions, Service
Extensions, or a combination thereof, for Permanent Residential Service is $1247 per
meter or residential dwelling unit.
NON-RESIDENTIAL ALLOWANCES. The allowance for Disb'ibufion Line Extensions,
qr a combination thereof, for Permanent Non-Residential Service is determined by SCE
using the formula in Section C.2.
Where the Distribution Une Extension will serve a combination of residential and non-
residential meters, residential allowances will be added to non-residential allowances.
SEASONAL, INTERMITTENT, AND INSIGNIFICANT LOADS. When an Applicant
requests service that requires a Distribution Line Extension to serve loads that are
Seasonal or Intermittent, the allowance for such loads shall be determined using the
formula in Section C.2. No allowance will be provided where service is used only for
emergency purposes, or for Insignificant Loads.
(Continued).
(To be inserted by utility)
Advice 1441-E
Decision 99-12-046
4C2
Issued by
John R. Fielder
Senior Vice President
(To be inserted by Cal. PUC)
Date Filed Mar 15, 2000
Effective Ma}, 1, 2000
Resolution
Southern California Edison
Rosemead, California
Revised
Cancelling Revised
Cal. PUC Sheet No. 27026-E
Cal. PUC Sheet No. 24688-E
Rule 15
DISTRIBUTION LINE EXTENSION,'=;
Sheet 5
(Continued)
CONTRIBUTIONS OR ADVANCES BY APPLICANT
GENERAL. Contributions or Advances by an Applicant to SCE for the installation of a
DisttibutJon Une Extension to receive SCE sen/ica consists of such things as cash
payments, the value of Pacil~es deeded to SCE, and the value of Excavation performed
by Applicant.
PROJECT-SPECIFIC COST ESTIMATES. SCE's total estimated installed cost will be
based on a project-specific estimated cost.
CASH ADVANCE. A cash Advance will be required only if Applicant's excess allowance
is less than SCE's total estimated installed cost to complete a Distribution Line
Extension.
TAX. All con~butions and Advances by Applicant am taxable and shall include an
Income Tax Component of Conb'ibution (ITCC) at the rate provided in the SCE's'
Preliminary Statement. ITCC will be either refundable or non-refundable in accordance
with the corresponding contribution.
REFUNDABLE AND NON-REFUNDABLE AMOUNTS. Applicant shall contribute or
Advance, before the start of SCE's construction, the following:
UNDERGROUND REFUNDABLE AMOUNT. Applicants refundable amount is
the portion of the SCE's total estimated installed cost, including ITCC, to
complete the underground Distribution Line ExtenSion (including transformers,
and excluding Betterments) that exceeds the~amount of Distribution Line
Extension allowanca detsrmined in Section C for.
(Continued)
(To be inserted by utility)
Advice 1433-E
Decision 99-06-079
5C2
Issued by
John R. Fielder
Senior Vice President
(To be inserted by Cal. PUC)
Date Filed Jan 31, 2000
Effective Jul 1, 2000
Resolution
Southern California Edison
Rosemead, California
Revised
Cancelling Revised
Cal. PUC Sheet No. 27027-E
Cal. PUC Sheet No. 24689-E
Rule 15
DISTRIBUTION LINE EXTENSIONR
Sheet 6
(Continued)
CONTRIBUTIONS OR ADVANCES BY APPLICANT. (Continued)
5. REFUNDABLE AND NoN-REFUNDABLE AMOUNTS. (Continued)
a. UNDERGROUND REFUNDABLE AMOUNT. (Continued)
(1)
CABLING. The estimated installed cost of any necessary Cabling
(including dis~'ibution transformem) installed by SCE to complete lite
underground Distribution Une Extension. This includes the cost of
conversion of existing single-phase lines to three-phase lines, if
required; plus
(2)
SUBSTRUCTURES. SCE's estimated value of Substructures installed
by App!icant and deeded to SCE as required.
OVERHEAD REFUNDABLE AMOUNT. Applicant's refundable amount is lite
portion of the SCE's total estimated installed cost, including ITCC, to complete
the overhead Distribution Line Extension (including distribution transformers and
excluding Betterments) that exceeds the amount of Distribution Line Extension
allowance determined in Section C for:
(~)
POLE LINE. All necessary facilities required for an overhead
Distribution Pole Line Extension and, if required, lite conversion of
existing single-phase lines to three-phase lines; plus
(2)
TRANSMISSION UNDERBUILDS. SCE's total estimated installed cost
of lite underbuild, where all or a portion of an overhead Distribution Line
Extension is to be consb'ucted on existing transmission poles of SCE.
NON-REFUNDABLE DISCOUNT OPTION. In lieu of contributing lite
refundable amount determined in Section D.5.a or D.5.b, Applicant has lite
option of contributing, on a non-refundable basis, fifty percent (50%) of such
refundable amount; plus
d. OTHER NON-REFUNDABLE AMOUNTS. Applicant's non-refundable amount
is SCE's estimated value of Excavation, Conduits, and Protective Structures
required by SCE for the Distribution Line Extension under Section B.1 .a.
JOINT APPLICANTS. The total contribution or Advance from a group of Applicants will
be apportioned among the members of the group in such manner as they may mutually
agree.
(Continued)
(To be inserted by utility)
Advice 1433-E
Decision 99-06-079
$C2
Issued by
John R. Fielder
Senior Vice President
(To be inserted by Cal. PUC)
Date Filed Jan 31, 2000
Effective Jul 1, 2000
Resolution
EDISON
Southern Dalitomia Ediaon Revised
Rosemead, Celifomia Cancelling Revised
Cal. PUC Sheet No. 27029-E
Cal. PUC Sheet No. 24690-E
Rule 15
DISTRIBUTION LINE EXTENSIONS
Sheet 7
(Continued)
CONTRIBUTIONS OR ADVANCES BYAPPLICANT. (Continued)
7. PAYMENT ADJUSTMENTS
CONTRACT COMPLIANCE.. If, after six (6) months following the date SCE is
first ready to serve residential I~ads for which allowances were granted, one (1)
year for non-residential loads, Applicant fails to take service, or fails to use the
service contracted for, Applicant shall pay to SCE an additional conthbution or
Advance, based on the allowances for the revenue actually generated.
EXCESS FACILITIES. If the loads provided by Applicant(s) results in SCE
having installed facilities which are in excess of those needed to serve the
actual loads, and SCE elects to reduce such excess facilities, Applicant shall
pay SCE its estimated total costa to remove, abandon, or replace the excess
facilities, less the estimated salvage of any removed facilities.
REFUNDS
GENERAL. Refunds are based on the allowancas and conditions in effect at the time
the contract is signed. The allowance in excess of that needed for the Service Extension
in accordance with Rule 16, will be refunded to the Distribution Line Extension to which
the Service Extension is connected.
TOTAL REFUNDABLE AMOUNT. The total amount subject to refund is the sum of the
refundable amounts made under Section D.5.
REFUND PERIOD. The total refundable amount is subject to refund for a pedod of ten
(10) years after the Distribution Line Extension is first ready for service.
RESIDENTIAL. Refunds will be made on the basis of a new customer's Permanent
Load which produces additional revenues to SCE. The refund will be deducted from the
total refundable amount, and the remaining amount subject to refund represents that
portion of the Distribution Line Extension cost not supported by revenues. (See Section
E.11 for Sedes Refunding Provisions.) .
NON-RESIDENTIAL. SCE shall be responsible to review Applicant's actual base annual
revenue for the first three years from the date SCE is first ready to serve. Applicant shall
be responsible for notifying SCE if new, permanent load is added the fourth through
tenth year from the date SCE is first ready to serve. Such review shall determine if
additiona! revenue supports any refunds to Applicant. (See Section E.11 for Series
Refunding Provisions.)
(Continued)
(To be inserted by utility)
Advice 1433-E
· Decision 99-06-079
7C2
Issued by ·
John R. Fielder
Senior Vice President
(To be inserted by Cal. PUC)
Date Filed Jan 31, 2000
Effective Jul 1, 2000
Resolution
EDISON
Southern California Edison
Rosemead, California
Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No. 24691-E
Cancelling Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No. 22985-E
Rule 15
DISTRIBUTION LINE EXTENSIONS
Sheet 8
REFUNDS. (Continued)
6.
(Continued)
UNSUPPORTED DISTRIBUTION LiNE EXTENSION COST. When any portion of a
refundable amount has not qualified for a refund at the end of twelve (12) months from
the date SCE is first ready to serve, Applicant will pay to SCE an Ownership Charge on
the remaining refundable balance. Monthly ownership costs are in addition to the
refundable amount and will normally be accumulated and deducted from refunds due to
Applicant. This prevision does .not apply to individual residential Applicants.
REFUND TIMING. Refunds will be made without interest within ninety (90) days after
the date of first service to new permanent loads, except that refunds may be
accumulated to a $50 minimum or the total refundable balance, if less than fifty dollars
(SS0).
MAXIMUM REFUND. No refund shall be made in excess of the refundable amount nor
after a period of ten (10) yearn from the date SCE is first ready to serve. Any
unrefunded amount remaining at the end of the tan-~ar pedod shall become property of
SCE.
PREVIOUS RULES. Refundable amounts contributed or Advanced under conditions of
a rule previously in effect will be refunded in. accordance with the provisions of such
earlier rule.
10.
11.
JOINT APPLICANTS. When two (2) or moro parties make joint contributions or
.Advances on the same Distribution Line Extension, refunds will be distributed to these
parties in the same proportion as their individual contributions or Advances bear to the
total refundable amouht, or as they mutually agroe.
SERIES OF DISTRIBUTION LINE EXTENSIONS. Whero there is a ~eries of
Distribution Line Extensions, commencing with a Distribution Line Extension having an
outstanding amount subject to refund, and each Disl~ibution Line Extension is dependent
on the previous Distribution Line Extension as a direct source of supply, a sedes refund
will be made as follows:
Additional service connections supplied from a Disfribution Line Extension on
which there is a refundabJe amount will provide refunds first to the Distribution
Line Extension to which they are connected; and
When the amount subject to refund on a Distribution Line Extension in a sedes
is fully refunded, the excess rofundable amount will provide refunds to the
Distribution Line Extension having the oldest outstanding amount subject to
refund in the sedes.
(Continued)
(To be inserted by utility)
Advice 1309-E
Decision 97-12-098
8C1
Issued by
John R. Fielder
Senior Vice President
(To be inserted by Cal. PUC)
Date Filed Ma},4, 1998
Effective Jul 1, 1998
Resolution
Southern California Edison
Rosemead, California
Cancelling
Odginal
Cal. PUC Sheet No.
Cal. PUC Sheet No.
24692-E
Rule 15
DISTRIBUTION LINE EXTENSIONS
Sheet 9
(Continued)
APPLICANT DESIGN OPTION FOR NEVV RESIDENTIAL INSTALLATIONS.
COMPETITIVE BIDDING. When Applicant selects competitive bidding, the Distribution Line
Extension may be designed by Applicant's qualified contractor or sub-contractor in accordance
with SCE's design and construction standards. All Applicant Design work of electdc facilities
must be performed by or under the direction of a licensed professional engineer and all design
work submitted to the utility must be certified by an appropdately licensed professional e0gineer,
consistent with the applicable federal, state, and local codes and ordinances. The applicant
design option is available to Applicant for new service and is not available for replacement,
reinforcement, or relocation of existing systems, where there is no applicant for new line or
service extension work. Under this option, the following applies:
1. Applicant shall notify SCE, in a manner acceptable to SCE.
Applicant designs shall conform to all applicable federal, state and local codes and
ordinances for SCE installations design (such as, but not limited to the California
Business and Professions Code).
SCE may require applicant designers to meet SCE's prequalification requirements prior
to participating in applicant design.
Applicant designers shall obtain SCE design and construction standards and
specifications prior to performing applicant design. SCE may charge for any of these
services.
SCE will perform one plan check on each applicant design project et no expense to
Applicant. SCE will perform all subsequent plan checks.at Applicant's expense.
For designs performed by a non-SCE designer, SCE will credit Applicant with the
amount of SCE's design bid less any appropriate charges such as for plan checking,
changes~ or revisions.
In the case of Applicant designed projects requi~ing an advance, SCE will apply the
design credit to the Applicant's advance.
If no advance is required, SCE will refund/reimburse the Applicant for the cost of design
after the Distribution Line Extension is flint ready to serve.
9. SCE shall perform all SCE's project accounting and cost estimating.
10.
The applicant design option for new non-residen~l installations will be available as an
option to Applicants no later than July 1,2001.
(Continued)
(To be inserfed by utili~)
Advice 1309-E-A
Decision 97-12-098
Issued by
John R. Fielder
· Senior Vice President
(To be inserted by Cai. PUC)
Date Filed Aug 10, 1999
Effective Aug 10, 1999
Resolution E-3576
EDISON
Southem California Edison
Rosamead, Califomia
)
Revised
Cancelling Revised
Cal. PUC Sheet No. 27029-E
Cal. PUC Sheet No. 24693-E
Rule 15
DISTRIBUTION LINE EXTENSION,~
Sheet 10
(Continued)
APPLICANT INSTALLATION OPTIONS
COMPETITIVE BIDDING. Under Competitive Ridding, the Distribution Line Extension
may be installed by Applicant's qualified contractor or sub-contractor in accordance with
SCE's design and specifications. Under this option, the following applies:
SCE's total estimated installed project-specific cost will apply regardless of
whom Applicant selects to perform the installation.
b. Upon acceptance by SCE, ownemhip of all such facilities will transfer to SCE.
Applicant shall pay to SCE, subject to refund, any SCE costs associated with the
Distribution Une Extension, including the estimated costs of design,
administration, and installation of any additional facilities and labor necessary to
complete the Distribution Line Extension.
SCE's total estimated installation cost is subject to the refund and allowance
provisions of the applicable role.
e. Applicant shall pay to SCE, as a non-refundable amount, the cost of inspection.
Only duly authorized employees of SCE are allowed to connect to, disconnect
from, or perform any work upon SCE's facilities.
MINIMUM CONTRACTOR QUALIFICATIONS. Applicant's contractor or subcontractor
(QC/S) shall:
Be licensed in California for the appropriate type of work (electrical and general,
etc.).
Employ workmen properly qualitied for specific skills required (Qualified
Electrical Worker, Qualified Person, etc.) as defined in State of California High
Voltage Safety Orders ('13tie 8, Chapter 4, Subchapter 5, Group 2).
c. Comply with applicable laws (Equal Opportunity Regulations, OSHA, EPA, etc.)
(Continued)
(To be inserted by utility)
Advice 1433-E
Decision 99-06-079
10C2
Issued by
John R. Fielder
Senior Vice President
(To be inserted by Cal. PUC)
Date Filed Jan 31, 2000
Effective Jul 1,2000
Resolution
Southem California Edison
Rosemead, California
Revised
Cancelling Revised
Cal. PUC Sheet No, 24694-E
Cal. PUC Sheet No. 22987-E
Rule 15
DISTRIBUTION LINE EXTENSION,~
Sheet 11
(Continued)
APPLICANT INSTALLATION OPTIONS. (Continued)
OTHER CONTRACTOR QUALIFICATIONS. An Applicant for service who intends to
employ a QC/S also should consider whether the QC/S:
· a. Is technically competent.
b. Has access to proper equipment.
Demonstrates financial responsibility commensurate with the scope of the
Has adequate insurance coverage (worker's compensation, liability, property
damage, etc).
e. Is able to furnish a surety bond for performance of the contract, if required.
OVERHEAD DISTRIBUTION LINE EXTENSIONS FOR SUBDIVISIONS OR DEVELOPMENTS
1. Overhead Distribution Une Extensions may be constructed in Residential Subdivisions
or Developments only where either a. or b. below are found to exist:
The lots within the Residential Subdivision or Development existed as legally
described parcels prior to May 5, 1970, and significant overhead lines exist
within the subdivision or development.
The minimum parcel size within the new Residential Subdivision or real estate
development, identifiable by a map filed with the local government authority, is
three (3) acres and Applicant for the Distribution Line Extension shows that all of
the following conditions exist:
(1) Local ordinances do not require underground construction;
(2) Local ordinances or land use policies do not permit further division of
the parcels involved such that parcel sizes less than three (3) acres
could be formed;
(3)
Local ordinances or deed restrictions do not allow more than one
single-family dwelling or accommodation on a parce of less than three
(3) acres, or any portion of a parcel of less than three (3) acres;
(Continued)
(To be inserted by utility)
Advice 1309-E
Decision 97-12-098
Issued by
John R. Fielder
Senior Vice President
(To be inserted by cal. PUC)
Date Filed May4, 1998
Effective Jul 1, 1998
Resolution
EDISON
Southern Califomia Edison Revised
Rosemead, California Cancelling Revised
Cal. PUC Sheet No. 27030-E
Cal. PUC Sheet No. 24695-E*
Rule 15
DISTRIBUTION LINE EXTENSION,~
Sheet12
(Continued)
OVERHEAD DISTRIBUTION LINE EXTENSIONS FOR SUBDIVISIONS OR DEVELOPMENTS.
(Continued)
Overhead Distribution IJne Extensions may be constructed... (Continued)
b. The minimum pamel size...(Continued)
(4) Exceptional circumstances do not exist which, in SCE's opinion, warrant
the installation of underground distribution facilities. Whenever SCE
invokes this provisi(~n, the cimumstances shall be described promptly in
a letter to the Commission, with a copy to Applicant for the Distribution
Line Extension; and
SCE does not elect to install the Distribution Line Extension
underground for its operating convenience. Whenever SCE elects to
install the Distribution Une Extension underground for Es operating
convenience, the exba cost compared with overhead shall be borne by
SCE.
I. SPECIAL CONDITIONS
FACILITY RELOCATION OR REARRANGEMENT. Any relocation or rearrangement of
SCE's existing facilities, at the request of, or to meet the convenience of an Applicant or
customer, and agreed upon by SCE, normally shall be pe#ormed by SCE. Where new
facilities can be constructed in a separate location, before abandonment or removal of
any existing facilities, and Applicant requests to perform the new censtruction work, it
can be performed under the applicable provisions of Section G, Applicant Installation
Options.
In all instances, SCE shall abandon or remove Es existing facilities at the option of SCE.
Applicant or customer shall be responsible for the costs of all related relocation,
rearrangement and removal work.
PERIODIC REVIEW. SCE will periodically review the factors it uses to determine Es
residential allowances, non-refundable discount option percentage rate, and Cost of
Service Factor stated in this rule. If such review results in a change of more than five
percent (5%), SCE will submit a tariff revision proposal to the Commission for review and
approval. Such proposed changes shall be submitted no sooner than six (6) months
after the last revision.
Additionally, SCE shall review and submit proposed tariff revisions to implement relevant
Commission decisions from other proceedings that affect this rule.
EXCEPTIONAL CASES. When the application of this rule appears impractical or unjust
to either party or the ratepayers, SCE or Applicant may refer the matter to the
Commission for a special ruling or for special condition(s), which may be mutually
agreed upon.
(Continued)
(To be inserted by utility)
Advice i433-E
Decision 99-06-079
f2C2
Issued by
John R. Fielder
Senior Vice President
(To be inserted by Cal. PUC)
Date Filed Jan 31, 2000
Effective Jul 1,2000
Resolution
La"Il EO Tso '
Southern California Edison Revised
Rosamead, Califomia Cancelling Revised
Cal. PUC Sheet No. 24696-E*
Cal. PUC Sheet No. 22989-E
22990-E
Rule 15
DISTRIBUTION LINE EXTENSIONR
Sheet13
(Continued)
J. DEFINITIONS FOR RULE 15
Advance: Cash payment made to SCE pdor to the initiation of any work done by SCE which is
not covered by allowances.
Applicant: A person or agency requesting SCE to deliver/supply electric service.
Betterment: Facilities installed by Applicant at the request of SCE in addition to those required
under Section B.l.a.
Cabling: Conductors (including cable-in-conduit, if used), connectors, switches, as required by
SCE for primary, secondary, and se~ca installations.
Commercial Development: Two (2) or mom enterprises engaged in bade or the furnishing of
services, (e.g., shopping centers, sales enterprises, business offices, professional offices, and
educational or governmental complexes) and located on a single parcel or on two (2) or mom
contiguous parcels of land.
Conduit: Ducts, pipes or tubes of certain metals, plastics and other materials acceptable to
SCE (including pull wires and concrete encasement where required) for the installation and
protection of electric wires or cables.
Contribution: In-kind servicas and the value of all property conveyed to SCE at any time during
SCE's work on an extension which is part of SCE's total estimated installed cost of its facilities, or
cash payments not covered by Applicant's allowances.
Cost of Service Factor: The factor as stated in Rule 2 that includes'taxes, retain, depreciation
which is applied to the Net Revenue to determine SCE's investment in distribution facilities.
Distribution Line Extension: New distribution facilities of SCE that is a continuation of, or
branch from, the nearest available existing permanent Distribution Line (including any facility
rearrangements and relocations necessary to accommodate the Distribution Line Extension) to
the point of connection of the last service. SCE's Distribution Une Extension includes
transmission underbuilds and converting an existing single-phase line to three-phase in order to
furnish three-phase service to an Applicant, but excludes service transformers, meters and
services.
Distribution Lines: Overhead and underground facilities which are operated at distribution
voltages, and which are designed to supply two (2} or more services.
Distribution Trench Footage: The total trench footage used for calculating cabling costs. It is
determined by adding the total length of all new and existing trench for the installation of
underground primary and Secondary Distribution Unes designed to supply two (2) or moro
services (excluding service trench footage under Rule 16).
(Continued)
(To be inserted by utility) Issued by
Advice 1309-E John R. Fielder
Decision 97-12-098 Senior Vice President
(To be inserted by Cal. PUC)
Date Filed . May4, 1998
Effective Jul 1, 1998
Resolution
Southern California Edison
Rosemead, California
Revised
Cancelling Revised
Cal. PUC Sheet No. 31053-E
Cal. PUC Sheet'No. 27142-E*
Rule 15.
DISTRIBUTION LINE EXTENSIONR
Sheet 14
(Continued)
J. DEFINITIONS FOR RULE 15 (Continued)
Excavation: All necessary trenching, backfilling, and other digging to install Distribution Line
Extension facilities, including furnishing of any imported backfill material and disposal of spoil as
required, sun"ace repair and replacement, landscape repair and replacement.
Feeder Conduit: Conduit for such uses as part of a backbone system to provide for future
anticipated Icad growth outside the subdivision involved, to provide for future anticipated load
growth in the existing subdivision and the existing subdivisions in dose proximity, to balance
loads between substations, to interconnect the service to the subdivision with service to
subsequent developments outside the subdivision, and to provide the fiexibility and versatility of
modifying or supplying emergency backup power to the ama involved.
Franchise Area: Public streets, roads, highways, and other public ways and places where SCE
has a legal right to occupy under franchise agreements with governmental bodies having
jurisdiction.
Industrial Development: Two (2) or more enterprises engaged in a process which creates a
product or changes material into another form or product and located on a single parcel or on two
(2) or more contiguous parcels of land.
Insignificant Loads: Small operating loads such as gate openers, valve controls, clocks, timing
devices, fire protection equipment, alarm devices, etc.
Intermittent Loads: Loads which, in the opinion of SCE, are subject to discontinuance for a
time or at intervals.
Net Revenue: That portion of the total rate revenues that support SCE's Distribution Line and
Service Extension costs and excludes such items as Energy, transmission, public purpose (D)
programs, revenue cycle services revenues, and other revenues that do not support the
Distribution Une and Service Extension costs.
(Continued)
(To be inserted by utility) Issued by (To be inserted by Cal. PUC)
Advice 1607-E John R. Fielder Date Filed Apr 2, 2002
Decision Senior Vice President Effective Apr 1, 2002
~c~0 Resolution E-3765
Southern California Edison
Rosemead, California
Revised
Cancelling Revised
Cal. PUC Sheet No. 24698-E
Cal. PUC Sheet No..22991-E
Rule 15
DISTRIBUTION LINE EXTENSION,C;
Sheet15
(Continued)
J. DEFINITIONS FOR RULE 15 (Continued)
Ownership Charge: Monthly charge as a percentage rote applied against the outstanding
unrefunded refundable balance after twelve (12) months from the date the SCE is flint ready to
serve. Serves to recover the cost of operating and maintaining customer-financed facilities that
are not fully utilized.
Permanent Service: Service which, in the opinion of SCE, is of a permanent and established
character. This may be confinuous, intermittent, or seasonal in nafure:
Pole Line: Poles, cress-arms, insulatom, conductors, switches, guy-wires, and other related
equipment used in the construction of an electric overhead line.
Protective Structures: Fences, retaining walls (in lieu of grading), sound barriers, posts, or
· barricades and other structures as required by SCE to protect distribution equipment.
Residential Development: Five (5) or more dwelling units in two (2) or more buildings located ·
on a single parcel of land.
Residential Subdivision: An area of five (5) or more lots for residential dwelling units which
may be identified by filed subdivision plans or an area in which a group of dwellings may be
constructed about the same time, either by a builder or several builders working on a coordinated
basis.
Seasonal Service: ElecMc sen/ice to establishments which are occupied seasonally or
intermittently, such as seasonal resorts, cottages, or other part-time establishments.
Scenic Areas: An area such as a scenic highway, a state or national park or other area
determined by a governmental agency to be of unusual scenic interest to the general public.
Scenic highways are officially designated under the California Scenic Highway Program
established pursuant to Paragraph 320 of the Public Utilities Cede and applicable sections of the
Streets and Highway Code. State or national parks or other areas of unusual scenic interest to
the general public ara determined by the appropriate governmental agency. "In pro)'Jmity to"
shall mean within 1,000 feet from each edge of the right-of-way of designated scenic highways
and from the boundaries of designated parks and scenic areas. "Visible from" shall mean that
overhead distribution facilities could be seen by motorists or pedestrians traveling along scenic
highways or visiting parks or scenic areas.
(Continued)
(To be inserted by utility) Issued by
Advice 1309-E John R. Fielder
Decision Senior Vice President
(To be inserted by Cai. PUC)
Date Filed May4, 1998
Effective Jul 1, 1998
Resolution
EDISON
Southern California Edison
Rosemead, California
Revised
Cancelling Revised
Cal. PUC Sheet No. 24699-E
Cal. PUC Sheet No. 22992-E
Rule 15
DISTRIBUTION LINE EXTENSION,~
Sheet 16
(Continued)
DEFINITIONS FOR RULE 15. (Continued)
Substructures: The surface and subsurface structure~ which am necessary to contain or
support SCE's electric facilities. This includes, but is not limited to, such/hings as splice boxes,
pull boxes, equipment vaults and enclosures, foundations or pads for surface-mountad
equipment. ,
Trenching: See Excavation.
(To be inserted by utility) Issued by (To be inserted by Cal. PUC)
Advice 1309-E John R. Fielder Date Filed Ma}, 4, 1998
Decision 97-12-098 Senior Vice President Effective Jul 1, 1998
~6c~ · 97-12-099 Resolution
ENCO Page 1 of 2
We have changed our name from Edison Utility Services (EUS) to ENCO Utility Services
(EUS) effective July 2002.
Corporate History
Edison Utility Services (EUS) was formed in 1997 by Edison International to be an
unregulated subsidiary. Its business purpose was to act as a separate, self-sufficient
organization able to deliver electric utility services to non-regulated entities. In January
2001, SRM-ENCO acquired EUS and EUS is no longer a subsidiary of Edison
International.
SRM-ENCO LLC, whose majority ownership is held by Apollo Real Estate Investment Fund
IV, L.P., specializes in investments in large-scale residential, commercial and industrial
developments.
With the acquisition of EUS, SRM-ENCO, LLC combines its development experience and
real estate capital underwriting and investment strengths with expertise to deliver integrated
electric, gas, and water services to developers and municipalities at unregulated, superior
prices.
EUS is the only full service provider of wet and dry utility infrastructure services in the
country. These services include design, construction and operation of in-tract electric power
distribution, gas,and water systems for master planned communities, publicly owned
utilities, and industrial parks.
Our spirit of quality and customer focus is exemplified in our delivery of products designed
expressly for new and existing utility service providers. Our staff of experienced
professionals provides the industry's most sophisticated technologies and business
processes that together deliver exceptional quality service at a price that will allow you to
jump ahead of the competition.
If your goals are to participate in the revenue streams generated by dry and wet utilities and
leverage the opportunities created by the regulatory changes we are experiencing
nationwide, then we can tailor a program specific to your needs. To further enhance our
package of services, we can perform sophisticated economic analysis and complex
financial modeling to determine if you could benefit from public utility ownership, distributed
generation or an on-site generation installation. Learn more about what we can do for you:
http://www.encoutilityservices.corn/body_index.html 08/19/2002
ENCO Page 2 of 2
please call Dennis Eastman at 1-714-283-6081.
Bundled Utility Service
Electric, Gas, and Water.
Distributed Generation and On-site Generation
Oppodunity analysis, project development, generation facility design,
permitting, construction and on-going operations and maintenance.
We are committed to exceeding our client's expectations by building strategically
designed plans around our customer's goals and making capital available to
implement their business model. By helping clients realize their objectives, we build
productive and lasting relationships. Read on to find out more about who we are and
what we do.
ENCO
UTIUTY SERVICES
Legal/P rivaqy/Copyr_ig h_t Statement
http://www.encoutilityservices.com/body_index.html 08/19/2002
Team Page 1 of 2
Team
We are hands-on with every project for every client. We deliver more than 100 years of
experience. As projects require, we draw from a pool of industry experts in infrastructure
design, construction, operations and customer fulfillment.
Experience
The EUS senior management team has decades of experience in operating and maintaining
one of the largest, most efficient and reliable electric systems in the country.
President and Chief Executive Officer, Dennis A. Eastman, served as Vice President of
Southern California Edison's (SCE) Electric Distribution Business Line from 1991 until 1997.
Under his leadership, SCE achieved one of the lowest operation and maintenance costs per
customer in the country while at the same time ranking among the most reliable utilities.
This solid experience results in a highly skilled and trained field staff that is capable of
providing exceptionally reliable customer service for its utility partners and their customers.
EUS technical expertise extends beyond the traditional management of transmission and
distribution systems to visionary leadership in developing and implementing new technology
applications within the utility industry and delivering state-of-the-art telecommunications
solutions.
ENCO Utility Services is highly sensitive to governmental and regulatory policies. We will
assure compliance with ail local, State and Federal regulations and ordinances and industry
code requirements in the operation and maintenance of facilities. In addition, EUS is highly
sensitive to the environmental impact of its operations and closely monitors work to meet or
exceed environmental compliance standards.
The people who make up ENCO Utility Services have extensive experience in all aspects of
utility operations and services:
http://www.encoutilityservices.com/html/body_team.html 08/19/2002
Team Page 2 of 2
· Transmission and Distribution system design, construction, operations and maintenance
· All phases of system engineering and planning
· "Heat of the battle" experience in emergency service restoration
· Core business process analysis and change implementation
· Financial modeling
· Application of new technologies, including state-of-the-art distributed and other on-state,
generation resources
In addition to the expertise that comes from having been part of the transmission and
distribution business of the second largest investor-owned utility in the country, our team has
shown its visionary leadership by developing and implementing advanced technologies. And
we are experienced in the people side of the business, as well as, adept at delivering
successful process changes to implement critical business objectives.
Every ENCO Utility Services product or service comes with the minds and commitment of our
.people. They are what make our products and services so exceptional.
ENCO
UTILITY SERVICES
Leqal/Pr vacy/Cqp_yriqht Statement
http://www.encoutilityservices.com/html/body_team.html 08/19/2002
Senior Management Page 1 of 1
Dennis A. Eastman is President and CEO of ENCO Utility Services. Mr. Eastman has led the
research to find the best technical solutions to deliver our utility and telecommunications
services. Through his leadership, we have developed strategic relationships to deliver
distributed generation and on-site generation resource infrastructures to meet the new and
developing opportunities from deregulation. Previously, at Southern California Edison, he
managed the $5 billion utility infrastructure to gain significant operational efficiencies while
improving' customer service as measured through interruption frequency and customer
minutes of interruption. Mr. Eastman was instrumental in creating and implementing new
technology applications within the utility industry.
Robert (Bob) M. H. de Korn~ is Senior Vice President for ENCO Utility Services. He directs
the development of new business opportunities. His primary responsibility is the sale of
bundled utility services including the design, construction, operation, maintenance, and
customer services for utility asset owners. These services are offered to owners of electric,
gas, and water systems. Previously at Southern California Edison, during his distinguished
31 -year career, Bob held many leadership positions. He directed the design, construction,
and operations of the electric system for several districts while managing the delivery of
customer service and supporting community affairs.
Michael J. Powers is Chief Operating Officer for ENCO Utility Services. He is responsible for
the oversight of telecommunications, electric, gas and water utility services for residential,
commercial and industrial developments. Electric, gas and water responsibilities include
design, construction, operation, and maintenance of all utility outside plant, including
structures, cable, equipment installation, service drops and interconnection facilities. Mike
previously directed distribution design, construction and maintenance activities for Southern
California Edison and Consolidated Edison of New York.
Ruby M. Irigoyen is Vice President of Customer Services for ENCO Utility Services. She is
responsible for the delivery of billing and customer care services, demand side management,
and energy efficiency programs. Additionally, she is responsible for market planning; national
sales, and advertising. She develops long-term financial projections by project, develops
rates, rules, and procedures for delivery of electric, gas, and water, products and services.
While at Southern California Edison she worked extensively in the areas of public affairs,
customer field services, accounting, credit, collection, and call center service delivery. She
also directed all aspects of the state-of-the-art facility known as the Customer Technology
Application Center (CTAC) to develop, test, and demonstrate new energy efficient technology
applications for Southern California Edison customers.
ENCO
UTIUTY SERVICES
Legal/Privacy/CopyriCht Statement
http://www.encoutilityservices.com/html/body_senior_management.html 08/19/2002
Bundled Utility Service
Page 1 of 2
Our Bundled Utility Services allow you to confidently
entrust some or all of the daily tasks involved in your
utility's operations to the capable hands of ENCO Utility
Services. By using ENCO Utility Services as your utility
management company, any activity--from system
design, construction and operations to providing
accurate and friendly service to a customer--will be
managed with the most advanced techniques,
equipment and service options available to the
industry.
We can help municipalities and master planned communities determine if they can benefit
from the establishment of a public utility and then provide the ongoing operations to insure a
profitable operation and stream of revenue.
Our services extend proven techniques and equipment to every kind of utility operation,
including electricity, gas, and water. When you sign up for our service, you get the benefit of
our hands-on utility experience. We will manage your operations with business practices and
technologies to maximize your system reliability, cost effectiveness, and customer value.
Complete service means that we provide all of the following services as a package--this is
where an existing utility can see the most dramatic savings.
We do recognize, however, that some utilities require support only in specific areas. For that
reason, we offer some of the listed services as stand-alone products. We will always work
with you to customize your choices and provide exactly what you need.
Complete System Design --We use highly reliable and cost-
effective system design standards and processes to support the
increasing efficiency of distribution systems and distributed
generation systems as well as the process of planning to support
growth.
System Construction --We put to work highly reliable and cost-
effective construction standards, work processes and resource
management methods.
Operations and Maintenance --We efficiently cover all aspects
of distribution assets for all types of utility services, including 24-
hour customer trouble response, restoration management, and
other utility operating systems.
Billing & Customer Care --We provide the latest in Customer
Information System technology, as well as personalized service
for all customer service and billing needs. We include call center,
meter reading, and other account management services.
24-Hour Operations Management Services --We provide
monitoring, control, dispatching and restoration services for the
lowest cost and highest labor efficiency, as well as, exceptional
status information and service response for customers.
· Supply Chain Management --We provide the power of economy-
http://www.encoutilityservices.com/html/body_bundled_utility_service.html 08/19/2002
Bundled Utility Service Page 2 of 2
of-scale and improved resource management techniques for your
utility's procurement, warehousing and material management
processes.
· Demand Side Management and Energy Services --We develop
and implement programs designed to assist your commercial,
industriar and residential customers in optimizing their energy
efficiency.
ENCO
UTILITY SERVICES
Legal/Privaqy/Copyrig ht Statement
http ://www.encoutilityservices.com/html/body_bundled_utility_service.html 08/19/2002
Distributed Generation and On-site Generation
Page 1 of 1
The competitive power industry is introducing alternatives to the traditional integrated utility.
A new market for on-site generation is emerging, driven by electric industry restructuring, the
unbundling of electric services, and increasing customer awareness of energy cost and
energy service options. EUS offers a complete turnkey solution.
EUS provides project specific economic evaluation, project plan development, licensing,
permitting, design, construction, plus ongoing operations and maintenance of gas turbine
generation facilities.
These systems provide new and existing public utilities the ability to continuously generate
electricity on-site for their customeri~s use with or without grid backup and for direct sales to
others over the existing electric transmission infrastructure.
if you would like more detailed information about any of these applications or how they might
benefit you, please contact us and describe your specific needs.
ENCO
UTlUTY SERVICES
Legal/Privacy/Co p~/r~ h_t S_tatement
http ://www.encoutilityservices.com/html/body_disthbuted_generation.html 08/19/2002
Contact Information Page 1 of 2
Offices:
ENCO Utility Services
8141 E. Kaiser Blvd., Suite 212
Anaheim, California 92808
Tel :(714) 283 6081
Fax:(714) 283 6089
E-mail comments and questions
eastman@encous.com
Position .............. i ....
Company ........... * i
Mailing address..
City ...................
State ................. *
Zip ....................
Phone number....* I
E-mail address...* I
Please make sure your email address is correct so we
can get you the information you are requesting.
· Required Fields
Question or Comments
You can be confident that ENCO Utility Services will not share
or otherwise disclose to third parties the information that you
provided to us on this Contact Information page without your
prior written consent.
ENCO
UTILITY SERVICES
http://www.encoutilityservices.com/html/body_contact_information.html 08/19/2002
DEPARTMENTAL
REPORTS
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY ~Z'~/~:~
DIRECTOR OFFINANCE /~"~
CITY MANAGER ~
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OFTEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council ..,../--
Howard Windsor, City Fire Chief
August 8, 2002
Monthly Departmental Report
RECOMMENDATION:
Attached for City Council's review and filing is the Fire Department's Monthly Activity Report for the
months of May, June and July 2002.
Month: May Year: 2002
1 2 23 50 248
Medic , + 10rain I 0 23 0 0 24 131
School Programs
Fairs and Displays
Company Inspections
LE-38 Dooryard Inspections
Burning Permits Issued
Pre Plans
2 0 0 2 0 4 17
1 3 0 3 0 7 22
30 0 0 1 0 31 368
0 0 109 0 31 140 140
0 0 2 11 0 13 134
0 0 0 1 3 4 24
Total 33 $ 111 18 $4 199 705
Month: May Year: 2002
Medical Aids 0 200 200 998
Traffic Collisions 0 51 51 240
Public Service Assists 0 2 2 17
Fire Menace Standby's 0 I I 2
Structure Fires 0 3 3 31
Ringing Alarm 0 3 3 42
Vegetation Fire 0 0 0 3
Vehicle Fire 0 0 o 1
Refuse Fire 0 0 o 3
Hazmat 0 0 o 1
Total 0 260 260 1338
Average Response Time 0 5.95 5.95 5.78
Longest Response Time 0 13 N/A N/A
Medic Squad Cancelled
Prior to Patient Contact 0 95 95 311
Average Wait Time for AMR 0 4.2 4.2 4.28
Medic Squad on Scene prior
to AMR- Medical Aids and
Traffic Collisions 0 89 89 581
Performed *ALS prior to
A/V[R's Arrival 0 74 74 306
*ALS - Advanced Life Support
Month: May Year: 2002
Buildin~ TI 25 14g
NCOM Buildin~ 4 46
UG Water 19 87
Over/Under Ground Tanks 1 1
NCOM Sprinkler 3 42
Sprinkler TI 10 41
Hood Duct 0 9
Spray Booths 1 3
Special Suppression Systems 1 4
Alarms 10 60
?lannin~ Cases 11 76
Special Code Permits 0 0
Miscellaneous 23 86
Total 111 603
Fire C of O 22 164
Shell Final 5 86
UG Hydro 4 47
Thrust Blocks 3 38
Over Head Hydro 26 103
Fire Flow 0 1
Flush 5 50
Sprinkler Final 8 50
Weld Inspection g 21
Hood Duct Final 2 12
Alarm Pre-wire 2 29
Alarm Final 9 104
Spray Booth Final 0 5
Fire Safety Inspection 2 41
State Mandated Inspection I 11
Special Events Inspection 11 14
Piping Hydro 0 2
Shear Valves 0 2
Over/Under Tank Final 1 3
Special Suppression System 0
Special Project Investigation I 5
Engine Company Follow-up 0 2
Miscellaneous 8 19
Total 118 810
Month: June Year: 2002
Medical Aids 0 219 219 1217
Traffic Collisions 0 39 39 279
Public Service Assists 0 1 I 18
Fire Menace Standby's o 1 1 3
Structure Fires 0 9 9 40
Ringing Alarm 0 3 3 45
Vegetation Fire 0 2 2 5
Vehicle Fire 0 0 0 1
Refuse Fire 0 0 0 3
Hazmat 0 0 0 1
Total 0 274 274 1612
Average Response Time 0 5.43 5.43 5.61
Longest Response Time 0 12 N/A N/A
Medic Squad Cancelled
Prior to Patient Contact 0 100 100 411
Average Wait Time for AMR 0 4.83 4.83 4.55
Medic Squad on Scene prior
to AMR- Medical Aids and
Traffic Collisions 0 103 103 684
Performed *ALS prior to
AMR's Arrival 0 69 69 375
*ALS - Advanced Lifi~ Support
Month: June
Year: 2002
Structure Fires
Vehicle Fires
Vegetation Fires
Other Fires
Medical Aids
Traffic Collisions
False Alarms
Fire Menace Standbys
Public Service Assists
Assists and Covers
Total
Medic Resp + 10min in City 3
0 0 15 17
Medic Resp + lOmin out City I
0 37 4 7 49 180
School Programs
Fairs and Displays
Company Inspections
LE-38 Dooryard Inspections
Burning Permits Issued
Pre Plans
Total
85
109
110
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 34
0 0
0 0
0 34
85
143
3
233
17
23
453
283
137
25
938
Month: June Year: 2002
Buildin[ TI 32 180
NCOM Buildin~ 12 58
UG Water 35 122
Over/Under Ground Tanks 0 1
NCOM Sprinkler 15 57
gprinkler TI 14 55
Hood Duct 5 14
Spray Booths 0 3
Special Suppression Systems 1 5
Alarms 17 77
Planninl$ Cases 15 91
Special Code Permits 0 0
Miscellaneous 13 99
Total 159 762
Fire C of O 18 182
Shell Final 13 99
UG Hydro 3 50
Thrust Blocks 1 39
Over Head Hydro 19 122
Fire Flow 0 1
Flush 4 54
Sprinkler Final 15 65
Weld Inspoction 1 22
Hood Du~t Final 4 16
Alarm Pre-wire 11 40
Alarm Final 18 122
Spray Booth Final 0 5
Fire Safety Inspection 8 49
State Mandated Inspection 0 11
Special Events Inspection 0 14
Piping Hydro 0 2
Shear Valves 0 2
Over/Under Tank Final 0 3
Special Suppression System 0 1
Special Project Investil~ation 1 6
Engine Company Follow-up 0 2
Miscellaneous 2 21
l~otal 118 928
Month: July
Year: 2002
Structure Fires
Vehicle Fires
Vegetation Fires
Other Fires
Medical Aids
Traffic Collisions
False Alarms
Fire Menace Standbys
Public Service Assists
Assists and Covers
Total
Medic Resp + 10rain in City 6
Medic Resp + 10min out City 3
6 1 I 1 0 24 307
0 18 3 0 24 204
Number of Calls 6 2 0 0 26 34 34
Time Committed (hours) 2.10 0.22 0.00 0.00 9.13 11.45 11.45
School Programs
Fairs and Displays
Company Inspections
LE-38 Dooryard Inspections
Burning Permits Issued
2
86 0 0 0 0
125 0 0 10 7
2 0 0 0 1
Pre Plans 6 0 0 0 2
Total 222 1 0 11 10
2
86 539
142 425
3 140
8 33
244 1182
Month: July Year: 2002
Medical Aids 80 130 210 1427
Traffic Collisions 25 33 58 337
Public Service Assists 3 2 5 23
Fire Menace Standby's 0 0 0 3
Structure Fires 3 7 10 50
Ringing Alarm 3 0 3 48
Vegetation Fire 0 1 1 6
Vehicle Fire 0 I 1 2
Refuse Fire 0 0 0 3
Hazmat 0 0 0 1
Total 114 174 288 1900
Average Response Time 4.71 4.68 4.70 5.15
Longest Response Time 11 11 N/A N/A
Medic Squad Cancelled
Prior to Patient Contact 36 58 94 505
Average Wait Time for AMR 5.037 5.27 5.15 4.85
Medic Squad on Scene prior
to AMR- Medical Aids and
rral~c Collisions 59 86 145 829
Performed *ALS prior to
AMR's Arrival 24 46 70 445
*ALS - Advanced Life Support
Month: July Year: 2002
Buildin[ TI 26 206
NCOM Building 13 71
UG Water 19 141
Over/Under Ground Tanks 0 1
NCOM Sprinkler 13 70
Sprinkler TI 13 68
Hood Duct 1 15
Spray Booths I 4
Special Suppression Systems I 6
Alarms 14 91
Planning Cases 8 99
Special Code Permits 0 0
Miscellaneous 25 124
Total 134 896
Fire C of O 17 199
Shell Final 8 107
UG Hydro 11 61
Thrust Blocks 11 50
Over Head Hydro 13 135
Fire Flow 0
Flush 3 57
Sprinkler Final 12 77
Weld Inspection 3 25
Hood Duct Final 3 19
Alarm Pre-wire 4 44
Alarm Final 14 136
Spray Booth Final 1 6
Fire Safety Inspection 4 53
State Mandated Inspection 1 12
Special Events Inspection 1 15
Piping Hydro 0 2
Shear Valves 0 2
Over/Under Tank Final 0 3
Special Suppression System 0 1
Special Project Investigation 1 7
Engine Company Follow-up 1 3
Miscellaneous 10 31
lotal 118 1046
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
C1TY MANAGER ~/~) - '~-'~
City ManagedCity Council
Jim O'Grady, Assistant City Manager(~
August 20, 2002
Economic Development Monthly Departmental Report
Prepared by: Gloria Wolnick, Marketing Coordinator
The following are the recent highlights for the Economic Development Department for the month
of July 2002.
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Leads & Inquiries
In the month of July, the City received 3 leads and 2 inquiries to the City. The leads
consisted of the following:
· Company looking for available 10,000 - 12,000 sq. ft. sites for a distribution/office
building. Staff provided him with a business kit, community profile, business resource
guide and site information.
· Small Feng Shui Consulting Company or Holistic Health Center
The Southland Group, a real estate investor and developer, which has been active in
markets across the country contacted staff for information. They are currently looking at
residential and industrial opportunities in Temecula. Staff provided them with
Temecula's General Plan, Transportation Plans and other development information.
David Hale of Prudential Cai-Best Realty in Hemet represents a development group
interested in developing a medium size recreation facility in the Inland Empire.
Projections are that, depending on location, annual sales will be $2,000,000 or above.
They are exploring the idea of a city redevelopment area providing the property without
cost to construct the facility.
· A San Diego manufacturing company with 100 employees looking for 100,000 square
feet.
Staff presented a paper at the annual ESRI Conference in San Diego (ESRI is the company that
makes the GIS software). The subject of the paper/presentation was Implementing a GIS-
based Fire Incident Response Program. After the presentation, representatives from two
cities: Fort Worth, TX and Wilson, NC came up and asked about our provider - Plant Equipment
of Temecula. As a result, Plant Equipment may be getting additional business.
In the month of June, the Southwest Riverside County Alliance responded to 3 leads from
the Inland Empire Economic Partnership (IEEP) on behalf of the City of Temecula. The
Alliance received 4 inquiries from Expansion Management magazine. Attached is a copy of
their activity report.
Mall Tour
On July 9~, Forest City provided a tour of the Promenade Mall addition for Councilmembers
Comerchem, Pratt and staff. Leasing is going well and Macy's is scheduled to hold its grand
opening on September 28th.
Media/Outreach Materials
Staff wrote the City article for the Chamber Newsletter titled "Temecula's
Development Review Process Underway. Under the leadership of Temecula's Planning
Department, various City departments including Public Works, Building and Safety and Fire are
currently viewing their development processes to see how the City can provide a higher level of
service and expedite the permitting process. The article highlights the development review
process, the process review group and scheduled workshops.
Meetin~Is
Staff attended the EDC of Southwest Riverside County Board of Directors Meeting on July
18th. The EDC elected the following officers, which will serve a 1-year term:
President - Dennis Frank
Vice President - Keith Johnson
Secretary - Phil Oberhansley
Treasurer - David Phares
Discussions included the proposed school site near French Valley Airport, and Measure A.
Staff provided an update on the review of development process and GIS mapping for fire
services.
Staff met several times in July with Guidant representatives regarding their expansion plans
and Development Agreement.
On July 3rd, staff met with the Economic Alliance consultant, Ron Nater, regarding marketing
activities targeting biotech companies in the San Diego and Northern California areas.
Staff attended the Murrieta -Temecula Group Meeting on July 5th.
Staff attended the EDC of Southwest Riverside County Business Relations Committee
Meeting on July 11th. The visitation goal report: 20 personal visits and 16 phone interviews.
Company reports were given on Basics, Etc. and Magnecomp. Staff reported on the following:
approved contracts with the Chamber, EDC and Alliance, development review process
workshop scheduled for July 16th, Alliance event and the joint meeting with Murrieta regarding
the SDG&E Valley Rainbow Interconnect Project.
Staff attended the SANDAG IRPP Project Meeting in Escondido on July 11th regarding the
agency jobs-housing study.
On July 16, staff hosted the first public workshop in our development process review. The
meeting was attended by approximately 40 people, including representatives from Real Estate
Brokers, Contractors, Engineers, Property Managers, and others involved in the development
process. Staff from all of the development services departments (Planning, Building, Public
Works, and Fire) were in attendance.
Staff provided a brief background on the purpose of the meeting and our process review study
and current development procedures. Attendees appreciated the fact that we are conducting
this review and provided several dozen comments on things we are doing well, areas of
concern/things we should consider during our study, and specific recommendations for changes
to improve our procedures. Staff also answered a number of questions about our development
processes.
Staff received about 50 comments, and all were recorded by staff on '?lip charts" so that we may
consider them as we continue our study. Notes from the meeting will be sent to all attendees
and to the Council and Planning Commission as part of the study.
Staff attended the UCR Connect LINKS presentation on July 12th. Scott Gradert, Director of
Business Development of Primero Systems spoke on the topic, "The Future Internet -
Changes to Come and How They Will Effect Business."
On July 19th, staff met with Roger Ziemer regarding Development Processing Procedures
employed by the Gas Company.
Staff attended a lunch meeting with Steve Austin and Jim Lapuesta on July 22nd to discuss
economic development programs in Temecula and coordination with UCR Connect.
Mayor Roberts and staff attended a meeting with the Winegrowers Association on July 15th.
Topics covered included:
· Riverside County EDA Update
Future monuments - Main stone monument will serve as entryway to wine country.
Wayfinders will be composed of granite with Winegrowers logo.
Highway 79 South signage -Winegrowers will contact Cai Trans regarding signage.
Tourism Advertising
Staff provided an update on the City's advertising and marketing program benefiting the
Winegrowers. Media samples were also passed out for the attendees to look at.
City/County Planning Issues
Discussed Galway Downs and Citrus Vineyard Zoning
City support for streamlining County planning processes (i.e. Morgan Hill project)
· TOT Update
Council is currently reviewing Temecula's TOT rate.
SDG&E Update
Staff & Winegrowers Association oppose the SDG&E Valley Rainbow Interconnect
Project.
· French Valley Airport Development
Staff provided update on working with Riverside County on this development.
TOURISM
Special Events
Staff attended the Pechanga Resort & Casino VIP reception on July 16th. A tour was
provided which included viewing of guest rooms, meeting & banquet facilities and other hotel
amenities.
Medial Outreach Materials
On July 10t~, staff sent toudsm information and slides to Leanne Dupay of Disneyland
Resorts in Anaheim. She is a free-lance travel writer and will be writing an article on Temecula.
On July 15~, staff provided a press kit and was interviewed by Stephanie Frith of the
Associated Press in Sacramento. She wrote an article on Old Town, which was available for
the press to use for the July 20t~ weekend.
On July 22nd, Jeff Muddell with The Golf Channel in Florida, contacted staff for information,
contacts, accommodations and video footage. The Golf Channel hosts an hour-long nightly golf
lesson show. On August 22nd, The Golf Channel will film the golf segment at Temeku Hills and
then will include a travel log segment on the Temecula Valley. Upon their request, staff
provided an itinerary for them to consider with contact information. The show will air between
November 2002 - January 2003. This special series will highlight six different golf courses and
areas including: San Diego, Temecula, Palm Springs, Newport Beach, Los Angeles, and Death
Valley.
A meeting was held on July 24th with Mark Fisher, staff, Winegmwem Association and Lake
EIsinore Outlets to develop the ad concept and layout for the new ad campaign for Where
Magazine - Orange County and Where Magazine - San Diego.
The summer edition of Where - Orange County magazine was published and contained
Temecula's co-op ad and listings on Temecula's special events.
Staff assisted Karen Spring in the development of the City's ad and editorial for the August
issue of the Old California Gazette.
Staff submitted an ad to the Temecula Valley International Film & Music Festival for use in
their event program.
Kate Campbell, Assistant Editor for the California Farm Bureau Federation, produced an article
on Farmers' Markets in the July/August California Country magazine. The Temecula
Farmers' Market was highlighted (see attached). Ms. Campbell was one of the travel wdters
that attended the Chamber FAM Tour.
Meetin;Is
Staff attended the Chamber Tourism Committee Meeting on July 11th at Cross Creek Golf
Club. Staff provided a report on current city advertising and media coverage which included:
Advertising:
The San Diegan 2002-03 edition, LA Times Experience SoCal - A Guide to Entertainment
and Recreation (co-op with Winegrowers Association), the Ontario Convention & Visitors
Bureau, Where - Orange County magazine summer edition, Lake Elsinore Outlets 2002 Go
West Outlet Shopping Travel Planner (complementary full-page ad), Old California Gazette
for the months of August and September.
Media Coverage:
Westways Magazine will be featuring an article on antiquing in California and Old Town will be
highlighted, KCAL-9 News - upcoming news segment highlighting places to visit, Group Tour
Magazine, Michaela Edelhauser - a San Diego freelance travel writer, Meetings West
Magazine and a hardbound table display book on Temecula to be published by Gia Danson,
Vista Paciflca Publications.
Staff reported on its involvement with the Ontario Convention & Visitors Bureau's FAM
Tour, which targeted Mexico publications, television, radio, and Aero Mexico Airlines.
On July 10th, staff met with Ann Howell, graphic designer, on finalizing the new City tourism
ad.
Staff met with Group One Productions on July 17th to go review the first cut of the tourism
video component and interface of the CD Rom, In addition, the marketing partners met with
Group One Productions and staff on July 23rd to view and provide comments on the CD Rom.
Staff met with Pat Martinez, the new Director of the Temecula Valley Film Council, on July
17th to discuss Temecula's film permitting/process and other items.
On July 22nd, staff met with Dan Glick of Sunrise Balloons regarding co-op advertising
opportunities with Where Magazine and the Inland Empire Visitor Guide.
ATTACHMENTS
Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce Activities Report
Economic Development Corporation of Southwest Riverside County
Activities Report
Southwest Riverside County Economic Alliance Activities Report - June
Temecula Valley Film Council Activities Report
California Country Article
TEMECULA VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCLT
August5,2002
Shawn Nelson, City Manager
City of Temecula
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
Dear Shawn,
Attached please find the Monthly Activity Report as per our contract with the City of
Temecula.
The TVCC Board of Directors official announced the construction of the new Temecula Valley
Chamber of Commerce building. The building on Ynez Court will have approximately 6,000 square
feet.
This is the month of July at a glance:
Business Inquiry Highlights:
In the month of July, 14 businesses requested information on starting or relocating their business in
Temecula. They received a business packet, which includes a copy of the City of Temecula
demographics, relocation, housing, rentals, maps, organizations, etc.
Committee Highlights:
Tourism &Visitors Council: The Chamber staff submitted 10 local special events nomination
forms to the California Tourism California Celebrations 2003 Calendar Magazine. The Chamber's
publication company is in the final stages of the sales for the Visitors Guide. The Council held the
August meeting at the Pechanga Resort & Casino and had 45 Tourism related businesses in
attendance.
Education Committee: The Education Committee is currently reviewing initiating a Diversity
Awareness Program within the local schools. The Teacher Recognition task force will begin
meeting to recruit donations for the 2003 school year. TVCC Board has recommended the
Education Committee to organize a reception in honor of the newly named UC Riverside
Chancellor France A. Cordova. The committee will discuss the project at the August meeting.
Ways & Means Committee: The Ways & Means Committee is currently planning the 2002
Monte Carlo Extravaganza, which will take place at Wilson Creek Winery on Wednesday,
September 18, 2002 from 5:30-8:30 p.m. The committee is also working on the 11th Annual
Business Showcase scheduled for Wednesday, October 16, 2002 and the 37th Annual Installation
and Awards Banquet for Saturday, February 22, 2003 at the Pechanga Resort & Casino.
27450 Ynez Road, Suite 124 · Temecula, CA 92591
Phone: (909) 676-5090~· Fax: (909) 694-0201
www.temecula,org · e-mail: info@temecula.org
Local Business Promotions Committee: The Local Business Promotion's Business Resource
Task Fome will be creating a DVD that will provide the chamber members a mentoring program in
which businesses will discuss their success & failures and how they overcame specific hurdles.
The Businesses of the Month for August selected by the Education Committee are Riverside
Office of Education Regional Occupational Program and Palomar Interactive. Performance Print
Solutions was awarded the Chamber Spotlight, and Temeku Hills Golf Course is the Mystery
Shopper winner for the month of August.
Government Action Committee: John Standiford of the Riverside County Transportation
Commission gave a presentation of the extension of Measure A to be on the ballot in November.
The committee had concerns with Highway 79 not being included on the fist of projects. The
']'VCC Board recommendation was to support Measure A with the understanding that funding for
Hwy. 79 be addressed at the next month's board agenda for further discussion.
· Membership Committee: Murrieta Day Spa and the Boys & Girls Club were showcased at the
July 2002 Ambassador Networking Breakfast at the Embassy Suite Hotel. Roundtable Discussion
topic will be "Trade Show Marketing" for members who are contemplating to participate at the
October 2002 Business Showcase. Community National Bank will host the August 21,2002
Mixer. The Chamber is in the progress of sales for the new Temecula Business Resource Guide
& Membership Directory. 10,000 copies will be published for the city, members and community.
Tourism Highlights (Bulk brochure distribution)
Activity Report:
· 75 Winery Brochure and 50 Tour Maps to Linda Vargas to distribute to wedding guests.
· 150 Temecula Brochures, 20 Visitor Guides, 350 Winery Brochures and 50 Tour Maps to The
Country Store to distribute to customers.
· 35 Visitor Guides and 50 Winery Brochures to the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce
Weekend Visitor Center.
· 60 Old Town Maps, 60 Temecula Brochures, 60 Winery Brochures and 60 Tour Maps to
Temecula Valley Bank for distribution to relocating employees.
· 30 Winery Brochure to Morgan Run Resort & Club for distribution to their guests.
· 35 Temecula Brochures, 10 Visitor Guides, 35 Winery Brochures and 35 Tourism Maps to
Newmar Kountry Club to be distributed to campers.
· 40 Visitor Guides, 70 Winery Brochures, 10 Housing and 54 Museum Brochures to Temecula
Valley Chamber of Commerce Weekend Visitor Center.
· 175 Winery Brochures and 20 Tourism Maps to Temecula Creek Inn for distribution to their
guests.
· 125 Temecula Brochures and 10 Relocation Guides to Temeku Hills for distribution to clients.
· 20 Visitor Guides and 20 Tourism Maps to Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce Weekend
Visitor Center.
Activity Report:
· Tourism calls were 1,518 in July.
· Phone calls were 2,915 in July.
· Walk-ins were 2,260 in July.
· Web Page User Sessions were 6,232 in July.
Also, attached are the meeting minutes for the Tourism and Visitors Council, Education, Ways &
Means, Membership and Marketing, Local Business Promotions and Government Action committee.
If you have any questions regarding this information, please call me at (909) 676-5090. Thank you.
cc: Mayor Ron Roberts
Mayor Pro Tern Jeff Stone
Councilman Jeff Comerchero
Councilman Mike Naggar
Councilman Sam Pratt
Shawn Nelson, City Manager
Jim O'Grady, Assistant City Manager
Gary Thomhill, Deputy City Manager
Gloria Wolnick, Marketing Coordinator
TVCC Board of Directors
8-12-202 11:43AM FROM P. 2
EDC
[ Sot~thwest £werside ¢oun~~
August 12, 2002
Jim O'Grady
City of Temecula
PO Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
RE: Activity Summary - July 2002
Business Development
Staff received six business development leads for the month of July:
* A phone inquiry from Eddie Boyd of MSC in Colton, who was seeking available sites to
relocate his manufacturing plant. MSC is a manufacturer of industrial and commercial
ceiling fans. Mr. Boyd was seeking to lease or buy an existing building of 50,000 square feet.
Staff forwarded ,Mr. Boyd's request to Stevie Field, SWRC Economic Alliance, for further
assistance. (7/2)
· A meeting with Nancy Kohutek of Coldwell Banker Residential in San Diego, who was
seeking demographic information for Southwest Riverside County. (7/10)
. A phone inquiry from Aaron Adams, City of Temeeula, who requested assistance to find
an available retail site of 30,000-square-feet. Staff contacted M&H Realty, owner of the
old Costco building at Winchester and Margarita for inquiries. Further contact was made
directly between M&FI Realty and Mr. Adams. (7/12)
· A phone inquiry from Linda Fowler of Temeeula Valley Bank in Temecula, who requested
regional demographics, Staff prepared and delivered an information packet with copies of
demographic reports for the cities of Lake Elsinore, Murrieta, Temecula and surrounding
areas. (7/! 8)
* A phone inquiry fi.om a site selector who was seeking 12-20 acres of land with infrastructure
to building their expa~nsion bottling and distribution facility in 60,000 square feet of light
industrial space. Staff and Stevie Field coordinated a meeting with principals of the national
tenant to meet on August 9, along with City of Temecula staff. (7/23)
· A phone inquiry from a diem seeking to lease 6,000-square-feet of office space that would be
· used for a private K-12 school. Staff'provided her with possible sites and referred her to the
City of Ternecula for details on zoning issues, particularly regarding schools. (7/23)
Community Outreach
Staff attended the following meetings/events to promote or assist economic development efforts:
* Circle of Safe-T Rape Criliis Center (7/2) - A ribbon cutting ceremony tbr the Rape Crisis
Center at Rancho Springs Medical Center in Murrieta.
Po.q Oft~ce BOx 1388 · 274't7 l!ntexpri,*~ Circle West, S,'~ite #1 O1 · Te~ecula, C.A 92593-13,0,8
Office 909/600,/;0(~ · FAX 909/600-6005 ·gmail in.fo~cdc-swrc.org · www. edc-.'mrrc,ot'g
8~12-202 11:43AM F~OM
Jim O'G-rady
City of Temecula
Activity Summary - July 2002
Page 2 of 2
· Murrieta-Temecula Group Meeting (7/12)
· UCR CONNECT Links Meeting (7/12) - Guest Speaker Scott Gradert of Pfimero Systems
presented "The Future Interact - Changes to Come and How They Will Effect Business".
· Supervisor Venable's Third District Quarterly Workshop (7/17) - Topics of discussion
were transportation issues and Measure A.
· SWRC Manufacturers' Council Strategic Planning Meeting (7/18, 6:30 pm-9:00 pm) -
Last meeting in a series of the Council's strategic planning sessions to redefine the
organization's goals, objectives and structure.
· City of Temeeula Development Review Meeting (7/16)
SWRC Manufacturers' Council Board of Directors Meeting (7/24)
· United Way Campaign Coordinator Meeting (7/25) - Staffis co-chair of the 2002 United
Way's Annual Giving Campaign.
Business Retention
· Business Relations Committee Meeting (7/12) See attached meeting minutes for discussion
topics.
Administration/Organization
· EDC Board of Directors Meeting (7/18) - See attached meeting minutes for discussion
topics.
· Administration - Staff managed the daily operations of the EDC office; updated the EDC
website; prepared and distributed various EDC/community email updates to members/business
community; and completed all post golf tournament and fiscal year-end items.
This concludes the activity summary for July 2002. Should you have questions or need further
detail, please call me at 600-6064.
Respectfully,
Diane Sessions
Executive Director
8r12-202 11:44AM FROM
DRAFT
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
OF SOUTItVeEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY
BOARD OF DIRECTORS GENERAL MEETING
Thursday, July 18, 2002 - 9:00 a.m.
Workforce Development Center
27447 Enterpris. e Circle West, Temecula, CA
DRAFT
BOARD MEMBERS
Frank Casciari, California Bank ~"~rust
Stevie Field, SWRC Economic Alliance
Dennis Frank, UCR Extension
Ted Haring, Eastern Municipal Water District
Dick Kurtz, CDM Group. Inc.
Doug Misemer, Temecula Valley Drywall/
Timberlake Painting
Jim O'Grady. City of Temecula
Greg Pmdhomme, Kuebler, Pmdhomme & Co.
Tony Renz, Diversified The Staffing Solution
David Rosenthal, SWRC Manufacturers' Council
Gary Youmans, Community National Bank
Roger Zciraer, The Gas Company
EDC STAFF
Diane Sessions
Liz Yuzer
MEMBERS AND GUESTS
Rob Field, Riverside County EDA-
Aviation
Rene Manlcy, Kceton Construction
Joan Sparkman, Tcmccula Valley
Bank
CALL TO ORDER
· Board President Gary Youman~ called the meeting to order at 9:05 ~m.
MINUTES
* The Board reviewed the minutes of the June 20, 2002 Board of Directors Mecting~ Motion was made by
Dennis Frank, seconded by Dick Kurtz and carried unanimously to approve the m/nutes of the June 20,
2002 Board of Directors Meeting as presented,
FINANCIAL ,REPORT
· The Board reviewed the June 30, 2002 Financial Report that showed total monthly revenues of $19,914,
total expenses of $23,059 and total cash-in-bank of $66,387. Motion was made by Dick Kurtz, seconded by
Jim O'Grady and carried unanimously to approve the June 30, 2002 Financial Report.
· · The Board reviewed the golf tournament reconciliation that showed total revenues over expenses for the
June 27, 2002 golf tournament of $9,011.41. Gaxy Youmans was thanked for chairing a successful
fundraiser.
NEW BUSINESS
Certification of Quorum and Approve Officer Elections: Diane Sessions reported that a quorum was met
for officer elections The following were elected as officers of the Economic Development Corporation of
Southwest Riverside County for 2002-2003: Dennis Frank, President; Keith Johnson, Vice President; Phi]
Oberhansley, Secretary; and David Phares, Treasurer. Motion was made by David Rosenthal, seconded by
Energy & Water Issuzs Update: Ted Hating reported that F~tstem Municipal Water District encouraged
water conservation and that reservoirs in nortbem California were at 80%, He indicated that another dry
year could mean mandatory cutbacks but were not expected at this time. Mr. Hm'ing added that EMWD
offered residential and commercial rebates for conservation measures, Roger Zeimer reported The Gas
Company also offered rebates.
RCIP Update: No report available.
ADJOURNMENT
At 10:25 a.m., motion was made by Dennis Frank, seconded by David Rosenthal and carried unanimously to
adjourn the board meeting.
Respectively submitted by:
Elizabeth Yuzer Phil Oberhansley
Record/rig Secretary Board Secretary
8~12-202 11:A~AM FROM
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
OF SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY
BUSINESS RELATIONS COMMITTEE MEETING
Thursday, July 11, 2002 - 9:00 a.m.
Workforce Development Center, Executive Board Room
27447 Enterprise Circle Wes~, Temecula~ CA
.Comm,ittee Members Present:
Dennis Franlq UCR Extension
O. B. Johnson, WestMar Commercial Brokerage, Inc.
M/chael Lewin, Mirau Edwards Cannon Hatter & Lewin
Jim O'Grady, City of Temecula
Rex Oliver, Mumeta Chamber of Commerce
Tony Renz, Diversified The Staffing Solution
David Rosenthal, SWRC Manufacturers' Council
Alice Sullivan, Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce
Liz Yuzcr, EDC
Call To Order
,. Committee Chair Michael Lewin called the meeting to order at 9:05 a.m.
Follow-up Action Reports
* Basics Etc, Inc. - Michael Lcwin reported that the condemnation process affecting Bas/cs Etc. was not
immihent. He would postpone his call to them until later.
Company Contact Reports
Solid State Stamping - David Rosenthal reported that the owner of Solid State S~nping in Tem~ula was
setting up a holding company which would include this company. The owner recommended that Mr.
Rosenthal visit Solid State Stamping after August 1 in order to get a more accurate survey of the company.
· CNC Manufacturing - Jim O'Grady reported for Aaron Adams on his phone visit with Lydia Cruz, owner
of CNC Manufacturing in Temecula, a machine shop that manufactures parts for the aerospace industry.
The company relocated to Temecula from Torrance. They reported 7 employees at this location and they
all live in the area. Advantages to the area included being away from larger cities but a disadvantage was
the long drive to Los Angeles for parts and processing. Prima~y customers were the Department of Defense
and Boeing. They ship their parts to various locations across the United States. Ms. Cruz ranked their
business as small, with sales in the past year down due to cutbacks after September 11. They felt that the
local economy was getting better. They planned to increase their worlcforce by 2 but had no plans to expand
their plant. They did not have contingency plans for electhcal outages. They were happy doing business in
SW Riverside County and would bc willing to be a contact for other companies contemplating relocating to
this area. Ms. Cruz also indicated that they would most like to see a hospital in Temecula.
· Magnecomp Corporation - Dermis Frank reported on his phone visit with an official at Magnecomp
Corporation in Temecula~ Magnecomp's greatest need was for experienced machinists and they have
funded an engineering scholarship at USD. Survey will be forwarded to EDC staffat a later date.
8r12-202 11:ABAM FROM
BusinessRelafionsCommitteeMeefing
Minutes-July 11, 2002
~,.Page 2 of 3
Goal ,progress Report
· Michael Lewin announced that visits and phone interviews in the twelfth month of the fiscal year were as
follows:
27 visits ~ 3 points each + 33 phone interviews ~ 1 points each = 60 visits/calls ~114 points
YTD VISIT PHONE .POINTS
Goal 27 33 114
Actual 23 16 85
Variance -4 -17 - 29
New Committee Assignments
Michael Lew~n asked the committee to discuss the assignment procedure and how it might be strengthened ia
the future. He indicated that the focus had been on manufacturing firms and many were being recycled for
second visits. Mr. Lewin suggested that the Business Relations Committee expand to the service sector which
would include engineers, finance, accountants etc. Rex Oliver recommended that the EDC place ads or PSA's
to educate the public on what services are available from the EDC.
Mr. Lewin also recommended that a list of suggested businesses be available at each meeting so those present
ff. could select one or two rather than assigning five businesses to one member. Jim O'Cnady indicated that he
appreciated having a binder with additional EDC materials and suggested that each committee member have a
binder. The committee agreed that a goal of 60 visits for the next year should be attainable.
Rex Oliver suggested that the EDC also consider an email survey as an additional method to reach the business
community. The committee agreed that a review of the present survey was needed.
Michael Lewin reviewed the list of outstanding calls. Al/ce Sullivan agreed to call on Edge Development and
would accompany Dennis Frank to visit Label Productions Inc. David Rosenthal agreed to call on S & A
Surveying.
EDC News and Other Information
EDC Board Update - David Rosenthal reported that a slate of officers for the EDC had been proposed and
that ballots would be distributed next week,
City, County & Chamber News-~ City ofLal~ Eisinore - No report available. City ofMurrleta - Rex
Oliver reported that the July 1 annexation increased the population in Murrieta to 63,000; Azusa Pacific
College would move To the old Von's building; Lowe's would open their Murrieta facility approximately
August 2; and thc Murrieta City Council had approved a $10M bond issue for city improvements. City of
Temecula - Jim O'Grady reported that the Temecula City Council had approved funding for the Economic
Development Corporation and Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce; the City would conduct a
Development Review Process Workshop on July 16 at 2:00 designed to obtain community input followed
ap by a progress report to be submitted to the City Council in September; and Temecula City Council and
Murrieta City Council would bold a joint meeting on July 30 at 7:00 p.m. to discuss transportation issues
and other items of mutual interest
3O4-2489
¢e9) 694~444
Fax: ~6) 694~199
6OO,6OOO
ECO~NOMtC
ALLIANCE
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Marlene Best
Assistant City Manager
City of Lake Elsinore
Jim O'Grady
Assistant City Manager
City of Temecula
Lori Moss
Assistant City Manager
City of Murrieta
Stevie Field
Economic Development/Marketing Coordinator
July 15, 2002
SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY MONTHLY MARKETING UPDATE
Dear Partners:
Please consider this an update on the marketing activities for the Alliance as required in the
Southwest Riverside County Marketing for Business Attraction Agreement.
Leads
A total of seven leads were generated in the month of June. Three leads were from IEEP
and four leads were a result of our advertising with Expansion Management magazine.
SWRC CD's will be sent out to all BIO2002 leads within the next week.
Approximately 35 calls and/or follow-ups were made on both recent and past leads.
ConsultinR
As Ron continues to work on setting up appointments with San Diego and Northern California
biotech companies, he will now incorporate a high-technology industry focus as well as the
attraction of venture capital. Ron will work on gathering contact information of the
technology and venture capital decision makers in Ventura, Los Angeles, Orange and San
Diego counties for visits. Once appointments are schedule, we will contact all partners for
availability to attend representing the Alliance.
Trade Shows
I have contacted Christina Backlund with California Technology Trade and Commerce
Agency (CTTCA) for a list of the 2002-2003 trade shows. Once I receive these, we can
decide which shows I will attend on behalf of the Alliance for the next fiscal year.
"Taste of Southwest Riverside County" event
The first annual "Taste of Southwest Riverside County" was a groat success. I believe it was
well attended and informative to our business decision makers. At our July meeting, I think
it is important that we discuss what worked and what we will change for next time, as well as
how often we should plan such an event.
I recommend pre-event (approx. 6 months) advertising via an agreed upon medium to
generate new leads. Trade shows and magazine interest leads are a great start, however,
we need to focus on generating sedous interest in our region from the business decision
maker.
This week, I will be sending out thank you cards on behalf of the Alliance to our guests and
sponsors. I will also coordinate the post event press thank you to our sponsors.
Ad Aqenc¥ RFP
The ad agency RFP was released on Wednesday, July 3rd, with ali proposals due no later
than Tuesday, July 30th. I will share the findings at the July meeting.
GIS
The County GIS information was sent to GIS Planning on Wednesday, July 3rd. Anatalio is
anxious to get underway. The scheduled completion time is approximately the end of
August. I will provide a more complete update at the July meeting.
On an ongoing basis, I attend the following meetings:
SWRC Manufacturer's Council
Temecula/Murrieta Group
Business Relations Committee
SWRC EDC
LE EDC
Economic Development meetings concerning the Southwest Riverside County region
UCR Connect meetings
If you need any additional information or have any questions, please contact me at (909)
600-6066.
Sincerely,
Stevie Field
Marketing/Economic Development Coordinator
Copy: Brad Hudson
Robin Zimpfer
Debi Moore
Robert Moran
Teresa Gallavan
Ron Nater
FROM : TOM AND PAT MARTINEZ FAX NO. : 909-305-1218 Aug. 10 R002 03:08PM P2
TEMECULll VALLEY FILM Council
~ (~) ~7
Fax (909 6932748
28636 Old Tovm Frcn~t ~. 201-A
'l'e~ccuta, CA 92S90
TEMECULA VALLEY FILM COUNCIL
ACTIVITIES REPORT
AUGUST 2002
NEWLY APPOINTED OFFICERS OF THE FrLM COUNCIL:
New Officers are; Pat Martinez, Executive Director; Sunny Thomas, CO-President; Steve Phelps,
CO-President; Ellen Watkins, Vice President; Patty Slaton, Secretary/Treasure; Eve Craig, Judi
Staats,
THE BUSINESS OF 'J'O ~; FILM COUNCIL:
Preparing the Pro&mti~n CmJde. ~ ,~ ' ' e i~
January, 2003
* Monthly mail;~g of our four color Post Cards to Filmmakers
Development of a new Web Site Page. The Web Ske should be completed
and operating by the end of August, 2002
* Development of new Letterhead end Business Cards
Maggie Allen is the chairperson for the re-scheduled Temeeula Valley
Show Case 2002 to be held September 1 st at the C.R.C.. Twenty Seven
Contestants were selected from Riverside County and North San Diego
SUPPORT FOR TH~ TEMECULA VAI.~.~,Y INTERNATIONAL FILM AND MUSIC
FESTIVAL:
F~m Council members have taken volunteer positions with the Film Festival as
Operations Coordinator, Special Events Director and Workshop Coordinator.
The Fikn Council has supported the Film & Music Festival by reviewing films with
the public and by selecting final contestants for the Music competition_
Efforts to expand Festival Sponsorships included contacts w~th several businesses.
FROM : TOM AND PAT MARTINEZ FAX NO. : 909-303-1218 Aug. 10 2002 03:10PM P1
TEMECLrLA VALLEY COUNCIL
ACTIVITIES REPORT
PAGE 2
Film Council wilt have a display table during the Film Festival with information
packages for the Filmmakers. Information will include; Four Color Post Cards,
Maps on the W'meries and Local Information Maps plus Photographs of potential
fi~,a locations,
FILM CO~'NCI~ I~QUIRIES:
* (78) Phone calls, mostly related to the Film & Music Festival
(1) Film - OffRoad Motocross Facility needed for filming. Was referred to
the Inland Empire Film Commission
Film Council will continue to support filmmakers request and generate a higher awareness of the
Temecula area and to present the opportunities and benefits oflhis production to local merchants
and businesses,
Respectfully,
Pat Martinez
Executive Dkector
Far
tradi
Market day in the village square is an ancient tmdition. In olden
times, girls got fresh braids and boys got a good scrub behind the ears
before the family set off for town. At the market, the things people
needed in their daily lives-grain, turnips, honey, candles and a squeal-
lng piglet--were bought and sold.
Today the tradition is alive and well in California in the form of
firmers' markets. There are 350 to 400 certified farmers' markets be-
ing held throughout the state, with markets in Santa Monica, San
Francisco and Sacramento being among the oldest and biggest. About
2,600 California farmers sell at least part of the crops they produce at
these markets.
The state's certified farmers' market concept was introduced in the
1970s and is aimed at maintaining the traditional link between farm-
ers and consumers. Certified farmers' markets are places where
genuine or "certified" farmers sell their crops directly to a public
interested in quality, variety and freshness. County agricultural
commissioners verify that sellers grow their own crops and they ap-
prove locations for markets in their counties.
The city of Temecula, in Riverside County, has been holding cer-
tiffed farmers' markets on Saturday mornings in its old-town section
for more than a decade. Recently a second farmers' market was added
Wednesday mornings at The Promenade, an upscale shopping and en-
tertainment center nearby.
Organizers in Temeeula say market days are not just an opportuni-
ty to buy the best quality seasonal produce available--directly from
farmers--it's also a community event where shoppers socialize and
families spend time together.
In addition to reasonably priced farm products, the market offers
a~ts and crafts, as well as prepared foods. Nearby shops and restau-
rants open early, many putting on sidewalk sales and special offers.
Because Temecula is a well-known winegmpe growing region popu-
tar with tourists, its farmeis' market draws shoppers from across the
nation and the
Citrus grower and Temecula Farmers' Market manager Gayle
Cunningham said, "We've done surveys and find people come not just
for the produce, but also for the opportunity to visit with the farmers.
It's a chance to talk about growing practices and solve backyard gar-
den problems. Everybody has a farm in their background and they like
to tell us about it.'
The Cunninghams own a citrus grove in Fallbrook, a nearby eom-
munity of small farms that produces a wide range of specialty c~ps.
The Cuaninghams grow 15 varieties of fruit on about 12 acres.
"V~ grow exoUc c~t~s, ~ Cul~ham satd. That includes Buddha s
on diversi
hand, an unusual fruit that looks/ike an octopus crossed with a lemon.
It's grown for the rind and chefs use it as zest and candied peel. It's
a type of citron, which is popular in fruitcakes. We also grow
~mquats, persimmons and macadamia nuts.'
On a recent sunny morning, things were just beginning to bustle
at the Temecula market. One shopper was having a bridal shower
for her friend's daughter in the afternoon and needed salad fixings and
flowers for a table cemerpieee. Two y~ung boys elbowed each other
in front of a the stall where a farmer was selling fresh strawberries and
Gerber daisies. Mom decided to buy the boys some of each.
Before the morning was over, more than 3,500 people had come to
shop, eat and socialize. And, about 65 to 70 vendors--haft of tbem
farmers--had the opportunity to talk directly with consumers about
their tastes, interests and preferences.
What happens every week in Temecula is playe~l out throughout
California, from Beverly Hills to farm-friendly towns in the Central
Valley. Farmers set up their stands in the parking lots of shopping
malls, in parks and under freeway overpasses. Some assemble in
city squares and in front of transit plazas.
Dan Best, p~ident of the California Federation of Cenified Farmers'
Markets, explained that in the early days of the certified markets there
were more alternative farmers, but now the markets have family firm-
ers who grow on as much as 1,000 to 2,000 acres. The markets of-
fer farmers instant payment, low overhead and access to a concen-
tration of customers.
"Everyone wants a farmers' market on their own doorstep, ~ Best
said. "But if communities want them, they have to be willing to sup-
port them. There are a couple of philosophies at work in the markets.
One is that the market's purpose is to sell produce. The other is that
it's a community event where produce also is sold.'
He said either concept works, if communities are willing to put
effort into making the markets a success. One of the things Best said
farmers bring to these bustling market days is diversity, not just in abe
produce offered, but also diversity in who the farmers are themselves.
"Many are immigrants, some are farm laborers who have been able
to buy or lease their own ground,' said Best, who also manages the
farmers' markets ia Sacramento. "They're Itmong, Japanese, central
Europeans. We're starting to see Russian beekeepers. Although farm-
ers will always provide for mainstream tastes, there is a lot of variety
in what's grown.'
Best said California farmers are increasingly turning to farmers'
markets to improve their cash flow because low commodity prices,
global competition and increased opera~g costs mean farmers need
direct help from consumers to stay in business.
"We offer the safest, tastiest and most nutritious produce in the
world,' Best said. "We need to invest in our local farmers. That en-
sures they stay in business and farmland is preserved. We're all health-
ier for it.'
Best said farmers are looking forward to the marketing support
the state's new "Buy California" campaign will often This program,
which was just f~nded through legishtive action, will encoumge the
state's residents to choose California-grown produce over that pro-
duced elsewhere.
"If Californians are known throughout the world as preferring their
own locally grown produce, that's a testimonial,' Best said.
For more information on California's certified hrmers' markets
and to locate a nearby market, visit the California Federation of
Certified Farmers' Markets online at http:# farmenm~rket, ucdavis.edu/.
(Kate Campbell is a reporter
with the California Farm Bureau
Federation. She may be reached
at (800) 698-FARM or by e-mail
at kcampbell @cJbf .com. )
APPROVAL
CITY aTTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINAN~.~E
CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/Ci~
Debbie Ubnoskb,¥Director of Planning
August 27, 2002
Monthly Report
The following are the recent highlights for the Planning Division of the Community Development
Department in the month of July 2002.
CURRENT PLANNING ACTIVITIES
New Cases
The Division received 6_.1 new applications for administrative, other minor cases, and home
occupations and 18 applications for public hearings during the month of July. The new public
hearing cases are as follows:
Change of Zone
Certificate of Land Division Compliance
Development Plan
General Plan Amendment
Lot Line Adjustment
Massage Establishment
Minor Conditional Use Permit
Pamel Map
Tentative Tract Map
Variance
2
2
3
1
2
1
· 3
1
2
1
Status of Maior Proiects
Staff is working with project applicants to address any remaining issues and prepare the following
cases for public hearing before the Director of Planning or Planning Commission:
Roripaugh Ranch Annexation, Specific Plan, Environmental Impact Report and Development
Agreement. Staff is currently reviewing the latest re-draft of the Specific Plan. The DA and CFD
meetings have recently resumed.
Villages of Old Town - Specific Plan, General Plan Amendment and Environmental impact
Report have been submitted. Staff has reviewed the Specific Plan and provided comments to
the applicant. The applicant is in the process of revising the project details.
R:~,MONTHLY.RPT~2OO2~July 2002 Report.doc
1
Rancho Community Church - Application to design, construct and operate a church and school
campus on a 39-acre site. The overall proposal will include 292,745 square feet of religious and
school facilities with two four level (two story) parking structure (162,600 square feet and
380,023 square feet). The site will be developed in a number of phases beginning with a 1,500
seat, 26,927 square foot interim sanctuary with assembly room and a nursery; a two story
226,777 square foot administration building, 17 modular classroom buildings, a 9,695 square
foot preschool, a 300 seat, 5,856 square foot chapel, two field house buildings totaling 10,000
square feet and lighted athletic fields. Future phases include permanent first through twelfth
grade classroom facilities, a gymnasium, a 3,500 seat, 43,727 square foot worship center and a
parking structure. This project is located on the north side of State Highway 79 South east of
Jedidiah Smith Road. At the Planning Commission hearing on July 31,2002 they unanimously
recommended that the City Council approve the project. They also required that a lighting study
be prepared and reviewed by staff and forwarded with the report for Council action. The
application is tentatively scheduled for City Council review on September 24, 2002.
Villages of Temecula - Development Plan proposal for a 160 unit multi-family apartment
complex with a commercial retail/office center located on the south side of Rancho California
Road, west of Cosmic Drive and east of the Moraga Road and Rancho California Road
intersection. This project also includes a General Plan Amendment, change of zone (with a
PDO) and a parcel map. The State Clearinghouse has circulated the initial study, and no
comments were received. A community meeting was held on January 14, 2002. The Planning
Commission recommended approval of the project on February 20th. Staff has met with
adjacent property owners on two separate occasions and identified their concerns. The project
has been continued to the August 13, 2002, City Council meeting. The applicant has requested
that the project be continued to the September 17, 2002 City Council Meeting in order to resolve
remaining issues with the adjacent property owners.
T.R. Properties -A Development Plan application to construct, design, and establish a 15,489
sq. ft. multi-tenant industrial building on the southeast corner of ~Ninchester Road and Bostik
Court. The project was submitted on April 15, 2002. Revised plans have been submitted to
Planning and routed to all internal departments for comments and/or conditions of approval.
Planning has had a number of design comments, which are being reviewed by the applicant.
The applicant met with staff to consider design options, and will incorporate staff's requests.
Tentative Tract Map change of Zone - Tract Map application to subdivide 4.57 gross acres into
7 residential lots with one open space lot; Zone Change to change property zoning from L-1 to
L-2 to allow for 1/2 acre minimum lot sizes. Staff sent out an incomplete application letter to the
applicant on August 9, 2002.
Linfield Christian School Master Plan - Submitted by Linfield Christian School; a Conditional
Use Permit proposal to expand the existing facility with 154,397 square feet of additional
classroom and accessory structures and a proposed 37,500 square feet of housing for a
superintendent, caretaker and facility. This project is located on the north side of Pauba Road
west of Margarita Road (behind Temecula Valley High School). Staff met with the applicant
March 1, 2002, to discuss the need to process a PDO in order to establish development
standards and uses desired. Staff is awaiting submittal of material. A community meeting for
the project was held April 11,2002. This project is on hold pending the preparation of a Planned
Development Overlay application. The applicant anticipates submittal near the end of
September.
Commercial Tentative Parcel Map - Application submitted by Lowry and Associates to divide a
R:'W[ONTHLY. RPT~2002',July 2002 Repo~.doc
2
13.2-acres pamel into 14 commercial lots. The subject property is located at the southeast and
southwest cornem of State Highway 79 South and Pala Road. Staff has completed Initial Study
and the 30-day public review period will end in mid-June. The project was considered at the
June 27th Director's Hearing and was subsequently continued to August 29th meeting at the
applicant's request.
Meadowview Golf Course - Conditional Use Permit and Development Plan to design and
construct a public golf course and driving range within the Meadowview Community. Staff has
reviewed a third draft of Focused Environmental Impact Report. The developer is selecting a
new environmental consultant to complete the draft EIR.
Cingular Wireless Telecommunications & Sign Structure at Chaparral High School - Conditional
Use Permit to construct a 26 foot high, 14 foot x14 foot rectangular structure to house six
wireless telecommunication antennas and equipment, and structure will include three sides with
signage to consist of an 84 square foot non-illuminated sign with green letters and blue
background to read "Chaparral High School", a 42 square foot electronic message marquee,
and a 56 square foot blue and beige colored "C" letter with a black and green puma mascot
illustration. Staff is reviewing the most recently submitted materials for completeness. The
project was approved at the August 7, 2002 Planning Commission.
Overland Self Storage Facility - Conditional Use Permit to construct a 124,496 square foot, one
story, self-storage mini warehousing facility with beige stucco and beige metal siding exterior
walls and olive green color metal roofing on a two lot, 3.65-acres site, located south of Overland
Drive and east of Commerce Center Drive. Future phase to include construction of a one-story
3,000 square foot office and caretaker's dwelling unit located at front of site. Staff held a
Development Review Committee meeting on May8, 2002. As a result, a number of issues have
been identified and have been communicated to the owner and applicant. As of August 14,
2002, no plans have been resubmitted for continued review.
Rancho Dental - Planning application to construct, operate and establish a 3,719 sq. ft. dental
office building on the SW corner of Lyndie Lane and Rancho California Road. The project was
submitted on March 21,2002. Staff is working with the applicant on design issues. As of June
10, 2002, no plans have been re-submitted for planning review. The applicant submitted revised
plans on July 29, 2002. The plans have been routed to all applicable departments, which will be
conveyed to applicant.
Antenna Tower at Temecula Creek - is a Conditional Use Permit to construct and operate a 65
foot high cellular antenna, located at 44501 Rainbow Canyon Road (922-220-004); submitted by
AT&T Wireless. The application was deemed incomplete on April 24, 2002. A DRC meeting
was held on May 23, 2002. Staff is awaiting re-submittal by applicant.
Affirmed Housing Partners Tentative Tract Map No. 30604 - is a tract map for 17 single family
dwelling units on 2.20-acres of land, located on the north and south side of sixth street (922-052-
004, 005,006, and 010); submitted by Affirmed Housing Partners. The application was deemed
incomplete on April 27, 2002. Applicant resubmitted on May 17, 2002. Staff reviewed re-
submittal and issued comments. The item is scheduled for the August 21, 2002 Planning
Commission meeting.
Wireless Telecommunication - is a Minor Conditional Use Permit to co-locate three sector
antennas on an existing 57 foot high monopine and the installation of four equipment cabinets,
located at 41520 Margarita Road (954-020-005); submitted by AT&T Wireless. The project was
R:'~vlONTHLY. RPT'~2002~July 2002 Report.doc
3
deemed incomplete on May 7, 2002. A DRC meeting was held on May 23, 2002, and staff is
awaiting re-submittal by applicant.
Cingular Wireless Antenna Facility - Minor Conditional Use Permit to construct, operate and
establish an unmanned telecommunications facility consisting of installing (6) antennas in two
35' high metal poles, replacing the existing poles that are being utilized to hold up netting, which
prevents golf balls from entering into the public street. The project proposed was located on the
northeast corner of Rancho California Road and Margarita Road in the Temeku Hills Golf
Course. The project was submitted on November 30, 2001. On December 20, 2001, the project
was deemed incomplete at which time planning had requested redesign. Finally, on Mamh 12,
2002, the applicant had requested that the project be heard at a Directo~"s Hearing as submitted.
The project was heard atthe Director's Hearing on May9, 2002, at which time the homeowners
that reside in the Temeku Hills voiced a number of concerns. Consequently, the Hearing Officer
continued the project until the May 30, 2002, Director's Hearing in order to address the concerns
expressed by the homeowners. On May 30, 2002, the project was heard again, with a number
of homeowners in the audience who voiced opposition to the project. The Hearing Officer, after
hearing all the facts of the case made a decision to deny the project. The appeal was heard at
the August 7, 2002 Planning Commission meeting in which staff recommended denial of the
appeal. A number of homeowners attended the Hearing, voicing opposition to the project. The
Planning Commission decided to continue the item to the September 4th Planning Commission,
requesting that the applicant provide a complete alternative Design Analysis and samples of the
proposed steel poles.
Hampton Inn Suites - Development Plan to construct and operate a 70-room 4-story hotel
building at the northeast corner of Jefferson and Winchester. The project was continued to the
August 21 Planning Commission hearing. Staff recommends approval.
Wolf Creek Tentative Tract Map - Tentative Tract Map No. 30264 for the southerly half of the
Wolf Creek Specific Plan was submitted to Planning on June 26, 2002. The project was routed
to all applicable departments and agencies for review. As a result, the application was deemed
incomplete on July 25, 2002. Staff is continuing review of the Tentative Tract Map as of August
13, 2002.
Milgard Manufacturing - A Development Plan to design, construct, and operate a 54,000 square
foot expansion to the existing Milgard Manufacturing. The subject property is located at 26879
Diaz Road and also known as Assessor's Pamel Number 909-370-031. The Planning Director
has approved the project as a Fast Track project. The application was approved by the
Planning Commission on August 7th.
Professional Golfers College - Conditional use permit to design, construct and operate a golf
management school with a nine hole public practice course and driving range on a 22-acre site
on the south side of Rancho Vista Road between Meadows Parkway and Margarita Road. The
project is scheduled for the August 21st Planning Commission hearing. Staff recommends
approval.
BBK Performance - is a Development Plan request to build a 22,260 square foot two-story
industrial/warehouse building on a 1.4-acre site. The subject property is located on the east side
of Bostik Court, 170 feet south of Winchester Road. Staff is awaiting submittal of revised plans.
Rainbow Canyon Retail Center Design Guidelines - Application for approval of architectural,
landscaping and signage design guidelines for the Rainbow Canyon Retail Center. The subject
R:'Ut4ONTHLY. RPT~2002"July 2002 Reporl.doc
4
property is located at the southeast and southwest corners of State Hwy. 79 South and Pala
Road. Staff has delivered comments to the applicant and is awaiting submittal of revised
documents.
Crowne Hill Design Guidelines - is a Substantial Conformance request to modify the existing
Design Guidelines for the Crowne Hill Subdivision submitted on July 5, 2002. These guidelines
will establish the new design and development standards for the style of homes, fencing, entry
monumentation, and landscaping for the remaining 803 lots. Crowne Hill is located on the
southeast corner of Pauba and Butterfield Stage Roads. Upon completion of staff review this
request will be scheduled for a hearing with the Planning Commission. This application was
filed by Pacific Century Homes. Comments from staff's first review were provided at a meeting
held July 31,2002 and as of August 15th, revised documents are being reviewed for adequacy.
The Slater Industrial Buildings - is a Development Plan request to build two 11,213 s.f. concrete
tilt-up, office warehouse buildings on a 1.97 acre lot within the on the west side of Bostik Court
south of Winchester Road. Growth Management Company filed this application. The application
was deemed incomplete July 11,2002.
Jefferson Avenue Office Building - A Development Plan to construct a 21,870 square foot two
story office building on 1.67 acres of land, located at 27708 Jefferson Avenue (APN 921-400-
037-2); Submitted by Diamond Central Investors, LLC. The application was submitted on June
21,2002. A DRC meeting was held on August 8, 2002 and staff is awaiting resubmittal.
Naron Pacific- A proposal for zone change from L-1 to L-2 on 31.93 Acres and Tentative Tract
Map to subdivide into 33 residential lots and 2 open space lots. Staff has met with the
applicant's representative to address several concerns. The TTM is contingent upon the ZC,
therefore, this project is exempt from the Permit Streamlining Act. Staff is waiting for submittal of
a constraints map and submittal of a proposed PDO.
Caf~ Kerr- PA01-0587 - Administrative Development Plan for a Minor Conditional Use Permit
to allow outdoor dining. Sent applicant letter on July 31, 2002 that application has not been
processed due to Building, Fire, and Planning. Staff has tentatively scheduled the application for
Director's Hearing on September 12th 2002.
Edge Nightclub- A Minor Conditional Use Permit to operate an entertainment facility to include a
type 48 liquor license, live music, dancing, and other entertainment uses as outlined in the
submitted statement of operations in a 4,860 square foot existing building, located at 28822 Old
Town Front Street (APN 922-093-003); Submitted by Ronald Hannah. The application was
submitted on July 5, 2002. An incomplete letter was mailed to the applicant on July 30, 2002.
Roripaugh Estates - Land Use Changes and Development Plan are a collection of four
proposals, affecting property located on the northeast corner of Winchester and Nicolas Roads,
to: amend the General Plan to convert 8.3 acres of a 20.2 acre Neighborhood Commercial site
to Medium Density Residential; amend Roripaugh Specific Plan (same as the General Plan plus
text amendments); process a Tentative Tract Map for 52 residential lots; and a Development
Plan to build a shopping center on an 11.9 acre with 102,875 square feet of proposed floor
space. Application is tentatively scheduled for DRC review on August 29th 2002.
AT&T Wireless - A Conditional Use PermitJDevelopment Plan to construct, operate and
establish an unmanned wireless communication facility consisting of a 60'-0" mono-pine and a
8'x12' equipment area, located at the Rancho California Water District Water Reservoir
R:~vlONTH LY.R P'i-~2002',July 2002 Report.doc
5
Complex, east of Meadow Parkway. The project was submitted on June 21,2002. Although the
project was deemed complete on July 19, 2002, the applicant was advised that staff could not
support the proposal. Additionally, since the project was submitted, staff has received numerous
phone calls and letters in opposition from the adjacent homeowners, however the applicant,
Velocitel, inc. resubmitted revised plans. The applicant indicated that they would notify staff
whether or not they wished to continue their application. As of August 13, 2002, the applicant
has not indicated their intentions.
Harveston Product Review - Four (4) Development Plan applications for subdivision home
products for the Harveston SP, Planning Areas 3, 4 and 7. Each Development Plan Application
requests a specific architect and each architect have provided a variety of architectural styles,
colors, and materials. The product review was submitted on May 6, 2002. Staff met with the
applicant, Lennar Homes, to discuss a number of architectural design issues. The applicant
responded by revising the elevation drawings and resubmitted plans on July 19, 2002. Staff has
reviewed the revised plans and provided comments. Assuming timely resubmittal, the
applications are tentatively scheduled fro the September 4th Planning Commission meeting.
Kevin Brown Executive Office Building - A Development Plan to construct, operate and
establish an 11,642 square foot executive office building on 0.95 acres, located at 27247
Madison Avenue, west of Madison Avenue, north of Sanborn Avenue, submitted on July 26,
2002, by Herron & Rumansoff Architects. The project is currently being reviewed for
completeness.
Small Business Assistance
Penfold Building: Assisted sign contractor in developing a sign program for this new
commercial building in Old Town Temecula in preparation for the August Old Town Local
Review Board meeting.
· Lighthouse Thrift Building: Advised the new owner of this Old Town building regarding the City's
Facade Improvement Program for new paint, signs and construction for a new false front.
· Norm Reeves Group: Staff helped this business with plans for an expansion and renewal of its
temporary parking lot permit.
· Palomar Hotel: Provided information regarding the feasibility of expanding an existing business
in Old Town Temecula.
US Land Building: Met with new owner of this Old Town building regarding a new sign program
and outside paint under the Fa(;ade Improvement Program. Helped applicant prepare package
for submittal to the Old Town Local Review Board in August.
· JC Penney Salon: Aided corporate headquarters in making an application for a massage
establishment permit for the beauty salon at its Temecula store.
· Chocolate Florist: At request of owner made an on-site visit to this Old Town business in order to
help develop a new sign program and fagade improvements.
Flowserve: Assisted this local business in expediting occupancy changes to its existing building.
Coordinated meeting with City staff at site in order to facilitate conditional use permit
application.
R:'~IONTHLY.RP'I'~2002~uly 2002 Report.doc
6
· Lowe's: Worked with Operations Manager to develop a solution to outside storage problems and
help him obtain a release of his landscaping deposit.
Special Event Permits
· September 14t~ Celebration: Met with Mr. Paul Orozco, who is planning this event for Old Town
Temecula. Helped him with a new site plan for the proposed event area.
· Boys and Girls Club: Continue assisting representatives of this group with the placement of a
temporary commercial coach on there Pujol Street property.
· Tractor Race: Advising representatives of Southwest Events regarding their plan for a tractor
race this fall at the Northwest Sports Complex.
· Coolcat Collectables Car Show: Aided this new business with their application for a car show at
the Winchester Square Shopping Center.
· Temecula On Stage: Developed site plan and helped the Theater Foundation with the
application for this Labor Day fundraising event.
· Quaid Harley Davidson Grand Opening: Helped this new business with their application for this
upcoming event.
· Summer Nights: Aided City consultant Melody Brunsting with the processing of this City-
sponsored event.
Massage Establishment Permits
· Massage By Tracy: This business was issued a one-year renewal for a Massage Establishment
Permit on July 8, 2002.
· Old Town Temecula Salon: This day spa business located in Old Town Temecula was issued a
one-year Massage Establishment Permit on July 19, 2002.
Special Projects & Lonq Ran,qe Planninq Activities
The Division also commits work efforts toward larger scale and longer time frame projects for both
private and public purposes. These activities can range from a relatively simple ordinance or
environmental review to a new specific plan or a general plan amendment. Some of the major
special projects and long range planning activities are as follows:
Housing Element Update - The State Department of Housing and Community Development has
approved the approach in the revised Housing Element. The draft will now be scheduled for
public hearing before the Planning Commission on September 18th and tentative to the City
Council in October.
Comprehensive General Plan Update - The CAC has completed its review of the draft goals and
policies, and is currently considering alternative land uses. A joint Council-Planning
Commission workshop has been scheduled for July 17th. Staff is presently working to set up
another joint meeting to discuss land use resources.
R:~,,1ONTHLY. RP'r~?.002~July 2002 Report.doc
7
Traditional Neighborhood Development Ordinance - Final changes are being made prior to
scheduling this item for a Planning Commission workshop. This item is on hold pending
additional staff resources.
Surface Mining Ordinance - The staff and City Attorney had been making final changes based
upon feedback from the State prior to submitting this item to the Council for their consideration.
This item is on hold pending additional staff resoumes.
Hillside Development Policy - The policies are being examined for integration into the draft-
grading ordinance. This item is on hold pending additional staff resources.
Large Family Day Care Home Facility Ordinance - Staff is currently revising the ordinance for
the Commissioner's consideration.
Southside Specific Plan - This item is on hold pending additional staff resources.
Pechanga Parkway (formerly Pala Road) Widening & Sound Wall - Staff has revised the
Preliminary Environmental Study Form (NEPA) per comments from reviewing agencies. Staff is
reviewing the 70% sound wall design submittal and has provided landscape plans. Will provide
comments to Public Works.
Rancho CA Road Bridge Widening - Staff has reviewed the Draft Initial Study / Mitigated
Negative Declaration. Per staff direction, the consultant made changes to the Noise & Air Quality
sections of the document. Public review is scheduled fromAugust 16 to September 16, 2002.
Scheduled for Planning Commission on September 24, 2002.
Diaz Road Realignment- Staff is reviewing 90% Design Submittal for street improvements and
landscaping and will provide comments to Public Works.
PA02-0260 Valley Christian Fellowship - Staff will present a General Plan Amendment and
Zone Change from VL to PO on 2.75 Acre site at the SWC of Margarita and De Portola Roads
to Planning Commission on August 21 st 2002, recommending approval.
Overland Drive Extension - Staff has reviewed 2nd submittal of the draft initial study/Mitigated
Negative Declaration and has provided comments to Public Works.
· City - Project environmental reviews and permitting:
· PA00-0421 and PA00-0422 Butterfield Stage LLC - (Resurrected old project) General Plan
Amendment and Zone Change at SEC of Butterfield Stage Road and Hwy 79 South to change
20.33 acres from Neighborhood Commercial to Community Commercial and Open Space.
Applicant has new party interested in purchasing the site,
· Procedures to Implement CEQA - Staff initiated project to develop local guidelines for
processing CEQA documents, including the adoption of Local exemptions. The process will also
conform to the 2002 CEQA Guidelines.
o Interim Southside Fire Station Site
o First Street Landscape Improvement Project - Completed, City received a Grant
R:~IONTHLY.RP'i~2.002~July 2002 Report.doc
8
toward construction.
Vail Ranch Middle School Basketball Court Lighting - Negative Declaration
prepared, waiting for TCSD and TVUSD to reach an agreement regarding Use
Before School to City Council.
General Plan Amendments
Villages of Temecula, south of Rancho California Rd., west of Cosmic and east of Moraga
intersection. A community meeting was held on January 14, 2002. The project was approved at
Planning Commission on February 20, 2002 and will be scheduled for City Council in the near
future. Staff has met with adjacent homeowners on two separate occasions and identified a
number of concerns. The General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Development Plan, and
Tentative Parcel Map are scheduled to be heard at the June 25, 2002, City Council meeting.
· Rancho Highlands Drive was continued by the City Council on September 25, 2001.
A request to reduce the size of Via Industrial (Western Bypass Corridor) north of Avenida
Alvarado has been submitted and has been on hold pending the approval of a revised
Circulation Element.
Eli Lilly General Plan Amendment and Zone Change - The applicant's proposal would involve
changing the land use designations to Community Commemial. Staff recommends a
Professional Office designation on one parcel. A Specific Plan Amendment is required to
change the zoning for Planning Area Three of the Regional Center Specific Plan. The applicant
has submitted preliminary grading plans. Staff will meet with applicant on August 13, 2002 to
discuss preliminary landscaping and erosion control plans.
Margarita Village Specific Plan - A General Plan Amendment for Parcel Map 22513, amending
the land use from Neighborhood Commercial to Community Commercial on 9.77 acres located
at the southeast corner of Rancho California Road and Meadows Parkway (954-030-001);
Submitted by Venture Point. In addition to the General Plan Amendment the applicant has also
submitted a Specific Plan Amendment, Conditional Use Permit and Development Plan. The
applications were submitted on May 23, 2002. A DRC meeting has been scheduled on August
8, 2002.
Geoqraphic Information System (GIS) Activities
The equipment for the computers for all front ine fire emergency response un ts for the City s
GIS based Fire Response Program was purchased; Information Systems is preparing them for
installation.
Staff is awaiting he second deliverable from the Project Design Consultant's contract for the high
resolution digital aerial ortho-photographs of the City and surrounding area. This contract will
ultimately include 1 foot per pixel photographs (imagery) and contours at 5 foot intervals for 150
square miles around the City and 6" inch per pixel imagery and contours at 2 foot intervals for
the area within the city limits.
· Staff continues to work with Public Works staff to map storm drain locations with the City's GPS
unit. This is an ongoing project, which will take several months to complete.
· Recent mapping products and data requests include:
R:~¥1ONTHLY.RPT~2.002~July 2002 Report.doc
9
o Map identifying all vacant properties and their land uses for Economic Development
o Vacant land in relation to vacant properties for Planning
o Various requests for mailing labels for the Planning Department
o Maps of Old Town with building footprints for Redevelopment
o Fire Inspection map for the Fire Department
o Map showing status of commemial properties along 79(S) for Planning
o Map of signalized intersections and battery backups for Public Works
o Map of interconnect infrastructure for Public Works
o Map of maintenance areas for TCSD
o Map of road closures for 4th of July event at the Sports Park for Public Works
o Maps and analysis for possible PHS expansion for Economic Development
o Updated the Average Daily Trips map for Public Work
o Map identifying temporary parking area for Pechanga Casino
o Updates to the Fire Response Area map for Fire
o Vail Ranch parks map for TCSD
o Property owner map and labels for properties along 79(S) for proposed street name
change for Building
o Vicinity, zoning and land use exhibits prepared for Planning
Staff continues with ongoing data layer development and maintenance.
R:~MONTHLY, RP'I",2OO2~July 2002 Report.doc
10
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY '~--~
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
CITY MANAGE~
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
Jim Domenoe, Chief of Police
August 27, 2002
Monthly Departmental Report
The following report reflects special teams, traffic enforcement and miscellaneous activity occurring
during July of 2002. The Police Department responded to 37 "priority one" calls for service during
the month of July, with an average response time of approximately 5.2 minutes. A total of 1714 calls
for police service were generated in the Cityof Temecula during the month.
During the month of July, the Temecula Police Department's Town Center Storefront served a total
of 202 customers. Seventy-two (72) sets of fingerprints were taken, 39 people filed police reports
and 12 people had citations signed off. Crime Prevention Officer Lynn Fanene participated in a
number of special events, neighborhood watch and community-oriented programs during the month.
He also coordinated requests for patrol ride-alongs. Additionally, he continued to provide residential
and business security surveys/visits and past crime follow-up. Officer Fanene also continued to
process City Planning Department submissions of site plans/conditions.
The POP Teams continued to work on the "Crime Free Multi-Housing" project during the month of
July. The teams continued their Warrant Apprehension Program during the month, which resulted in
four felony arrests and two misdemeanor arrests. The POP Teams continued with their proactive
patrol efforts and made four additional felony arrests and 10 misdemeanor arrests. POP Teams
also continued with the homeless persons program, with the goal of assisting homeless in finding
services and aid to help them. The POP Team is continuing to monitor the graffiti program in
Temecula. They filed vandalism charges on one subject during the month of July.
The Old Town Storefront serves as an office for the POP teams and a location to assist the public
with police services. This has greatly increased their accessibility and their ability to serve the Old
Town area. During July, the Old Town Storefront served 154 customers. Twenty sets of fingerprints
were taken, 24 reports were written, and 16 citations were signed off.
The traffic team reported that during the month of July there were 735 citations issued for hazardous
violations, 127 citations were issued for non-hazardous violations and 83 parking citations were
issued. During the month there were just 11 injury traffic collisions, 64 non-injury collisions were
reported and 16 drivers were arrested for DUI. The Neighborhood Enforcement Team (NET)
Monthly Departmental Report
Page 2
program resulted in 25 citations being issued. This program addresses traffic concerns in
residential neighborhoods with a dedicated motor officer. The total number of SLAP citations issued
during the month of July was 188.
During the month of July, the POP officers assigned to the Promenade Mall handled a total of 179
calls for service. The majority of these calls were for shoplifting investigations. During the month,
calls and on-sight activity resulted in the criminal arrest and filings on 18 misdemeanors for various
offenses. Officers McEIvain and Rupe continued to provide training to security staff during the
month. The mall officers continued to work on vehicle theft and burglary programs. One vehicle
burglary occurred during the month of July. The Mall Booth is a great success and continues to
draw large numbers of people seeking information or just to speak to Officer Jerome Joyner.
Numerous children have been fingerprinted during the month of Ju~y and over 300 employment
applications have been distributed.
Four school resource officers continued to remain active during July. They continued to provide a
law enforcement presence on school campuses during summer school. The school resource
officers also conducted many counseling sessions with students. A total of nine
investigations/reports were conducted/written by the school resource officers during July. The
school resource officers, in cooperation with the Rotary Club and a local pre-school, conducted the
first presentation of"Safety Town", a national education program designed to teach young children
survival ski~ls in today's society.
The JOLT program (Juvenile Offender Law Enforcement Program) continues to be a success in part
through its Youth Court program. Officer Michelle Medeiros conducted the 92nd Youth Court
session. The JOLT officer assisted at other schools when needed and conducted follow-ups with
parents of juveniles in the JOLT program. Officer Medeiros worked with "at risk" juveniles
throughout the month and also conducted counseling sessions with their parents. She also assisted
the District Attorney's Qffice and the Probation Department by providing training during home visits
with incorrigible/at risk juveniles during the month of July.
During the month of July, the Special Enforcement Team (SET Team) of Officers John Wade and
Michelle Larson handled a total of nine cases. These cases resulted in eight misdemeanor and five
felony arrests, primarily for narcotics violations. This team continues to work street level narcotics
and specialty patrol within the city on a proactive basis. The SET Team served two felony arrest
warrants for narcotic violations in the City of Temecula during the month of July.
Volunteers from the community continue to be an integral part of the Temecula Police Department's
staff. Under the guidance of volunteer coordinator Officer Bob Ridley and assistant coordinator
Gayle Gerrish, the Police Department's volunteer staff contributed 470 hours of service in July.
Volunteer assignments include computer data input, logistics support, special event assistance and
telephone answering duties.
Community Action Patrol (CAP) Program volunteers have begun their activities, patrolling the city for
graffiti, conducting vacation residential checks and assisting patrol with special logistical needs and
special events. Other duties these volunteers will attend to are business checks and abandoned,
vehicles and traffic control. The goal of the program is high visibility, which prevents crime from
occurring. CAP Team members contributed 185 hours of service to the community during the
month of July.
The reserve officer program and mounted posse are additional valuable volunteer resources
available to the police department. The police department utilizes reserve officers to assist with
Monthly Departmental Report
Page 3
patrol, traffic enforcement, crime prevention, off road vehicle enforcement and a variety of special
functions. Reserve police officers worked a total of 153 hours specifically on patrol in Temecula
during the month of July.
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL
DIRECTOR OF FIN~
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Council/City Manager
Anthony J. Elmo, Director of Building and Safety
August 27, 2002
Departmental Report - July 2002
PREPARED BY: Carol Brockmeier, Administrative Secretary
TOTAL NUMBER OF PERMITS ISSUED ................................................................... 331
NSFR ................................................................................................................ 116
NCOM ................................................................................................................... 6
TOTAL VALUATION ..................................................................................... $24,024,880
TOTAL NUMBER OF INSPECTIONS PERFORMED ............................................................................. 4,166
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPROVAl /",
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANC_E,~.~
CITY MANAGER (~)
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager/City Council
William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
August 27, 2002
Department of Public Works Monthly Activity Report
RECOMMENDATION: Attached for City Council's review and filing is the Department of Public
Works' Monthly Activity Reports for the month of July, 2002.
MOACTRPT
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Monthly Activity Report
July / August 2002
Prepared By: Amer Attar
Submitted by: William G. Hughes
Date: August 27, 2002
PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION
1. Margarita Road Widening, Phase I (Interim), Pauba Road to Plo Pico
This project will widen Margarita Road on an interim bases between Pauba Road and Plo Pico. As a
result, Margarita Road will have four lanes throughout City limits. The contractor, R.J. Noble, has
completed the work. The final quantities will be calculated and the contract close out information will
be forwarded to City Council for the Notice of Completion.
2. Chaparral High School Swimming Pool
A 25-yard x 25-meter pool will be built at Chaparral High School. The facility will include a smaller
recreation pool component and a bathhouse with locker room facilities, restrooms and showers.
Spray-type play equipment will be included as an element in the base construction bid. The project
is complete with the exception of several minor punch list items. The final quantities will be
calculated and the contract close out information will be forwarded to City Council for the Notice of
Completion. The landscape maintenance period will be completed 8/30/02.
3. Pala Road Improvements, Phase I - (Widening to accommodate four lanes from Pala
Road Bridge to Wolf Valley) and Traffic Signals Modifications at Loma Linda, and at Wolf
Valley
Pala Road Improvements, Phase I, will give Pala Road two lanes in each direction (58 feet in width)
from the Pala Road Bridge to the Pechanga Casino. It includes n-striping the entire length. Pala
Road Phase I. In addition, the two traffic signals at Loma Linda and at Wolf Valley will be modified to
accommodate the road interim widening. This project is complete except for minor punch list items.
The notice of completion will be brought to City Council once the City has acquired the maint, bond
and contractor's affidavit.
4. Slurry Seal Program - FY2001-02
This project will slurry seal and protect various streets throughout the city. Construction began on
July 1,2002. Contractor anticipated being complete by end of August. Additional change order work
includes installing Type II Slurry, and mpainting various legends throughout the city.
5. First Street Extension - Environmental Mitigation
This project will create approximately 1.49 acres of wetlands along Murrieta Creek at First Street. It
includes construction of landscaping and irrigation improvements, and maintenance of said
improvements for a period of five (5) years in accordance with California Department of Fish and
Game and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers permit requirements. Bids were opened June 6, 2002.
Award is on hold pending RCFC/ACOE coordination with Murrieta Creek Improvement project.
R:~VlonthlyAc~ vityRepott\CIP~2002Uuly.doc
6. Pavement Rehabilitation Program - FY 2001/2002
This project will rehabilitate and reconstruct portions of Rancho California Road between Hope Way
and Cosmic Way. Bids were opened on June 18. The lowest bidder is R.J. Noble Company with a
bid of $593,194.85. Construction is to begin August 26, 2002. Anticipate construction to be finished
in November 2002.
7. Community Theatre - Mercantile Seismic Retrofit
This project will create a community theatre at the old Mercantile building in downtown Temecula.
Bids were opened on July 30, 2002. The lowest responsible bidder was 2H Construction Inc. from
Long Beach CA. with a bid price of $332,467.00. Construction anticipated to begin by the end of
September.
8. Citywide A.C. Repairs - FY2001-02
This project will repair various road sections throughout the City. Bids were opened on 8/15/02. All
American Asphalt was lowest bidder with a bid of $169,169.00. Council is to award contract on
August 27, 2002. Construction is anticipated to begin September/October 2002.
PROJECTS BEING ADVERTISED FOR BIDS
1. Children's Museum
This project will construct a 7,500 square foot children's museum. Plans, specifications, and
estimates ara complete for the shell improvements to the existing building. Bid opening for the
building shell improvements is scheduled for September 5, 2002.
PROJECTS IN DESIGN
1. Pechanga Parkway (Formerly Pala Road) Improvements - Phase II (SR 79 South to
Pechanga Road)
This project will widen Pala Road to its ultimate width from the Pala Road Bridge to Pechanga road.
The Preliminary Environmental Document Classification (NEPA) of the project has been determined
to be "Categorical Exclusion" with required technical studies (involving Federal action). The City is
currently working with Local Assistance to acquire all necessary signatures for the PES document.
The consultant submitted plans to RCFC & WCD for review and comment. Work is proceeding with
the remainder of the design.
2. Pechanga Parkway (Formerly Pala Road) Sound Wall Improvements
Under this project, sound walls will be designed and constructed on the southwest side of Pechanga
2 R:XMontldyActivityRepoffiC IP~2002U uly.doc
Parkway, from Rainbow Canyon Road to the Pechanga casino and on the northeast side along the
residences just north of Loma Linda, The City is currently reviewing the design plans (60%)
submitted by the consultant. The design plans (60%) were sent to all utilities and affected HOA's for
review. Environmental issues have been identified and documents are being prepared, Work is
being coordinated with the Pechanga Parkway Improvements - Phase II. i.
3. Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Over Murrieta Creek
This project will widen Rancho California Bridge over Murrieta Creek to provide four additional traffic
lanes. Staff is currently reviewing 100% drawings and specifications for completeness. Processing
for right of way and environmental requirements are schedule for completion by September 2002.
4. Temecula Library
A full service library, approximately 34,000 square feet in area, will be designed and built on Pauba
Road, just west of Fire Station #84. This project will provide the community with library resources
and services. A separate parcel has been created for the library for bond purposes. The application
to the State was submitted on 6/13/02. Utility services construction will be coordinated with Pauba
Road, Phase II Street Improvements.
5. Pauba Road Improvements - Phase II (Margarita Road to Showalter Road)
This project will widen Pauba Road from Showalter to just west of Margarita Road to its ultimate
width. The City has reviewed the 100% Design Plans submitted by the consultant. Specifications
are being prepared. Plans were sent to all utilities and all utility issues are being addressed.
Environmental issues were identified and the City Planning Dept is preparing the documents. Work
is being coordinated with the library project.
6. John Warner/Santiago Road Assessment District - Hydrology Study
Under this project a drainage study will be done to compliment the improvement plans being done
by the properbj owners. Eventually the city will be the oversight agency for a property owners
sponsored assessment district. The City Council approved a Professional Services Agreement with
Engineering Resources of Southern California, Inc. to do the hydrology study and the storm drain
design at the June 11,2002 meeting. The kick-off meeting was held on July 10, 2002 and a draft
Hydrology Study was received on 8/6/02. ERSC is working on the drainage alternatives.
7. Landscaping and Sidewalk On 79 South (Front Street to Pala Road)
The project consists of the design and construction of new sidewalk, landscaping, and irrigation
along State Route 79 South between Pala Road and Old Town Front Street. Review of 1st plan
submittal complete, however the project scope has been modified. Next plan submittal (60%) is
expected to include revised scope. Caltrans comments have been received and have been given to
consultant.
8. Temecula Sports Complex
A new 40+ Acres sports complex will be built on Pala Road at Wolf Valley. The new sports complex
location will be at the corner of Pala Road and Deer Hollow Way Preliminary design is underway,
with council approval for the site layout scheduled for 2nd meeting in September.
3 R:'xMonthlyActivityReporf, C IP',2002~J uly.doc
9. Bridge Barrier Rail Upgrade, Rainbow Canyon Road over Pechanga Creek/Del Rio Road
over Empire Creek
This project will replace the existing barrier rails of the Rainbow Canyon Bridge over Pechanga
Creek and the Del Rio Road Bridge over Empire Creek. Simon Wong Engineering (SWE) submitted
the 90% Design documents. City reviewed and returned with minor comments to SWE. Final
submittal should be ready by the end of August.
10. Fire Station - Wolf Creek Site
A fire station will be built at the Wolf Creek Site. B&S has reviewed second submittal and provided
plan check comments. Architect to meet with B&S to go over comments. Further progress is now
dependent upon Wolf Creek development plans for southerly side of Wolf Valley Rd.
11. Pavement Management System Update
The project will establish a pavement management program that will provide an ongoing schedule of
needed repaim and provide data that will be used to prepare budget estimates required to complete
the scheduled work. GIS links, AutoCAD review, and updates to MicroPAVER are included in the
total program. The consultant has completed his pavement survey and is now preparing the
pavement study.
12. Vail Ranch Park (Near Pauba Valley School) - Add Amenities
This project will add amenities, including play equipment to the recently annexed Vail Ranch Park.
The Community Services Commission approved the Vail Ranch Park Site "C" Master Plan on
February 11,2002. The Master Plan was approved by City Council at the March 26, 2002 meeting.
RHA Landscape Architects/Planners Inc. is the design firm and the first submittal was made on May
3rd. The City reviewed these documents and returned them to the contractor for revisions. A
meeting between the City and RHA to discuss these comments was held on July 31 and revisions
are being made.
13. Diaz Road Realignment
Under this project, Diaz Road will be realigned to Vincent Moraga Road at Rancho California Road.
Business Park Drive will be a T-intersection at Diaz. City staff is currently designing the project.
Anticipated street and landscaping design completion is scheduled for August 2002. Right of Way
and environmental processing is anticipated to be completed by September of 2002.
14. Rancho California Road Median Modifications at Town Center
The project will include the closing of the two median openings on Rancho California Road in front
of the Town Center, while lengthening the left turn lanes at Ynez Road, Town Center Drive, and Via
Los Colinas to improve traffic circulation. The design is 100% complete. To avoid construction
during the holiday period, bidding will not begin until October with construction starting in January
2003. This project will be combined with PW00-20.
15. Rancho California Road Widening at Ynez Road (Add right turn lane to westbound lanes)
This project will add a right turn lane on westbound Rancho California Road at Ynez Road Right of
way acquisition at the northeast corner of Rancho California and Ynez is in process with Claim
Jumper Restaurant signing the acquisition agreement. In-house design is 90% complete. To avoid
construction during the holiday period, bidding will not begin until October with construction starting
4 R:~vlonthlyAclJvityRepor t~C ll~2(g)2'duly.doc
in January 2003. This project will be combined with PW00-02.
16. Winchester Road Widening Between Enterprise Circle and Jefferson
This project will widen Winchester road between Enterprise Circle and Jefferson Avenue. it will also
add a right turn lane from Eastbound Winchester to Southbound Jefferson, starting at Enterprise
Circle. Project layout was plotted and discussed with Traffic and DPW. In-house design continues.
17. Rancho California Sports park ADA Access and Shade Structure
Design and construct concrete ADA walkways to the remaining ball fields 3,4,5,7,8. Install two
shade picnic/seating areas adjacent to the snack bar building. Design and construct concrete ADA
walkways to the remaining ball fields 3,4,5,7,8. Install two shade picnic/seating areas adjacent to
the snack bar building. Design work is complete and presently in the plan checking phase.
Quantities being finalized, specification submittal will be in beginning of September.
PROJECTS IN THE PLANNING STAGE
1. 1-15/SR 79 Interchange - Project Study Report (PSR)
This project will modify the 1-15/SR 79 South interchange to accommodate projected future traffic.
The City received the final Value Engineering Analysis Report from Caltrans on May 8, 2002. All the
proposed alignments presented by the value analysis team were rejected. A meeting between City
and Caltrans staff is set for 9/11/02 to discuss the options.
2. French Valley Parkway Interchange, Project Report (PR), Plans Specifications, and
Estimate (PS&E) Preparation
This project will construct an interchange between Winchester Road Interchange and the I-15/I-215
split. Request For Qualifications (RFQ) notices have been advertised, were sent to selected
consultants, and were posted on the City's website. On August 13, 2002, the City and Caltrans
conducted a Project Presentation to over 40 prospective consulting engineers. The RFQ filing
deadline is September 5, 2002.
3. Murrieta Creek Bridge - Overland Drive Extension to Diaz
This project will entail alignment studies and the design of an extension of Overland Drive, westerly
to Diaz Road, which includes a new bridge over Murrieta Creek. The project includes the widening
of Overland Drive from Jefferson Avenue to Commerce Center Drive, and the extension of Overland
Drive across Murrieta Creek to Diaz Road. PDC has completed the alignment study and staff has
reviewed copies of the preliminary plans. Staff has reviewed design costs for next year's fiscal
funding. No funding until FY03-04
4. Alignment Study for Murrieta Creek Bridge Between Winchester Road and Temecula's
City Limits and Diaz Road Extension
This study will determine the alignment and location of the Murrieta Creek crossing between
Winchester Road to the northern City Limits. In addition, the study will be combined with the Diaz
5 R AM onth lyActivityR epor t~ClPk2002~July.doc
Road Extension alignment study and design. Coordination with the City of Murrieta, Flood Control
and Army Corps of Engineers is necessary. The Consultant and Staff met with Riverside County
Flood Control to discuss possible alignments. The consultant is currently awaiting data from
Riverside County Flood Control in order to complete the work on the first draft of the alignment
study. Staff was informed this data could take up to a year to receive.
5. Pedestrian Crossing- SR 79 North at Nicolas Road
City met with Caltrans and sent a letter at their request to initiate this project. Caltrans responded in
a letter that the bridge does not meet their warrents and that they will not support and allow its
construction. The final feasibility report was received from the consultant. Staff is currently reviewing
the options on the report and awaiting direction.
6. Murrieta Creek Multi Purpose Trail
This project will build portions of the equestrian and bike trails along Murrieta Creek within City
limits. The City has received a federal grant of $1,214,000. Caltrans has given the City the
"Authorization to Proceed with Preliminary Engineering". Request For Proposal will be sent out to
design consultants by the end of August.
PROJECTS THAT ARE SUSPENDED OR ON-HOLD
1. Santa Gertrudis Bridge Widening at 1-15
This is Phase Il of the Southbound Auxiliary Lane project at the southbound exit ramp for
Winchester Road. This project will widen the 1-15 southbound exit-ramp at the Santa Gertrudis
Creek Bridge to provide an additional lane on the exit ramp just north of Winchester Road. Staff is
revisiting the merits of this project in light of the proposed Project Study Report for Cherry Street
Interchange. The study shows that this bridge may have to be removed in the future to
accommodate the Cherry Street Intemhange. This project is suspended indefinitely.
2. Margarita Road/Winchester Road Intersection Improvements
Project is on hold. Under this project, an additional left turn from eastbound Winchester to
northbound Margarita will be added in order to accommodate increasing traffic volumes. Design is
50% complete. A developer may do this project.
3. Pujol Street Sidewalk Improvements - Phase II
Project is on hold. This project will complete the knuckle at the intersection of Sixth Street and
Felix Valdez. The developer of a nearby property may be designing and constructing this project.
4. School Site ADA Improvements
Project has been removed from this year's ClP. Design and construct ADA concrete walkways
and hand railing to athletic facilities at Temecula Middle School, James L. Day Middle School and
Margarita Middle School. TCSD re-allocated the funds.
5. City Hall Parking Lot Modifications
6 R:'~dontlflyActivityRepor t~C IPk2002'duly.doc
Project is on-hold, Funding has been postponed until FY 2004/2005. Under this project, a
security fence will be installed between the existing maintenance facility and the western side of City
Hall to secure the parking lot west of the main building. The design of a security fence between the
existing maintenance facility and the western side of City Hall will be performed in-house. The
design of a security fence between the existing maintenance facility and the western side of City Hall
is being performed in-house. A scoping meeting was held on 11/12/01. Reseamh on existing base
maps for the proposed area and as-builts for the existing security fence near the maintenance
facility is complete. Design and review of the proposed layout is complete. The project is currently
on hold waiting for further direction
7 R:~VtonthlyAcelvityRepor~ClP~2002XJuly.doc
LLI
~)
I-
Z
ILl
LIJ
0
n
--I
n
MEMORANDUM
TO: Bill Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
FROM: ~Bred Buren, Maintenance Superintendent
DATE: August 5, 2002
SUBJECT: Monthly Activity Report - July, 2002
The following activities were performed by Public Works Department, Street Maintenance Division in-house
personnel for the month of July, 2002:
I. SIGNS
A. Total signs replaced 56
B. Total signs installed 20
C. Total signs repaired 5~
I1.
TREES
A. Total trees tdmmed for sight distance and street sweeping concerns
4
III.
ASPHALT REPAIRS
A. Total square feet of A. C. repairs
B. Total Tons
2,180
39
IV.
CATCH BASINS
A. Total catch basins cleaned
12
VI.
VII.
RIGHT-OF-WAY WEED ABATEMENT
A. Total square footage for right-of-way abatement
GRAFFITI REMOVAL
A. Total locations
B, Total S.F,
STENCILING
A. 4;5 New and repainted legends
4~997 L.F. of new and repainted red curb and stdping
38
925
Also, City Maintenance staff responded to 47 service order requests ranging from weed abatement, tree
trimming, sign repair, A.C. failures, litter removal, and catch basin cleanings. This is compared to
46 service order requests for the month of June, 2002.
The Maintenance Crew has also put in 213 hours of overtime which includes standby time, special
events and response to street emergencies.
The total cost for Street Maintenance performed by Contractors for the month of July, 2002 was ~ 16~200.00
compared to ~ 14~155.00 for the month of June~ 2002.
Account No. 5402 $ 6,885.00
Account No. 5401 $ 9,315.00
Account No. 999-5402 $ - 0 -
Ron Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works
Ali Moghadam, Senior Engineer- (CIP/Treffic)
Greg Butler, Senior Engineer (Capital Improvements)
Amer Attar, Senior Engineer (Capital Improvements)
Jemj Alegria, Senior Engineer - (Land Development)
STREET MAINTENANCE CONTRACTORS
The following contractors have performed the following projects for the month of July, 2002
DATE DESCRIPTION TOTAL COST
ACCOUNT STREET/CHANNEL/BRIDGE OF WORK SIZE
CONTRACTOR: RENE'S COMMERCIAL MANAGEMENT
Date: JULY, 2002 CITYWIDE MECHANICAL WEED ABATEMENT AND
TRASH PICK-UP FROM CITY'S R.0.W.'S
# 5402
TOTAL COST $ 5,000.00
CONTRACTOR: BECKER ENGINEERING
Date: 07/15/02 DIAZ AT WINCHESTER REMOVE & REPLACE PEDESTRIAN CROSSING
BARRICADE DUE TO TRAFFIC ACCIDENT
# 5402
TOTAL COST ' I $1,885.00
Date: 07/15/02 VINTAGE HILLS CHANNEL REMOVE & REPLACED 480 SQ. FT. OF
CONCRETE RIBBON GUTTER
#5401
TOTAL
COST [ $ 9,315.00
Date:
TOTAL COST
Date:
TOTAL COST
Date:
TOTAL COST [
Date:
TOTAL COST
Date:
TOTAL COST
TOTAL COST ACCOUNT /~o401 $ 9,315.00
TOTAL COST ACCOUNT g5402 $ 6,885.00'
TOTAL COST ACCOUNT //99-5402 -0-
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DMSION
STENCILS / STRIPING
MONTH OF JULY, 2002
DATE LOCATION
WORK COMPLETED
07/01/02 OLD TOWN FRONT STREET AT RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD REPAINTED 8 LEGENDS
07/01/02 SPORTS PARK REPAINTED 3,817 L.F. OF RED CURB
07/02/02 AREA # 1 REPAINTED 380 L.F. OF RED CURB
07/08/02 CAFERA AT MEADOWS PARKWAY INSTALL 2 LEGENDS
07/08/02 AREA g4 REPAINT 2 LEGENDS
07/09/02 AREAS 2 & 3 REPAINT 27 LEGENDS
07/I 0/02 AREA #3 REPAINT 6 LEGENDS
07/11/02 AREAS 2, 3 & 4 REPAINT 38 LEGENDS
07/15/02 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT DIAZ, JEFI~'ERSON REPAINT 77 LEGENDS
07/16/02 JEFFERSON WEST OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD REPAINT 48 LEGENDS
07/17/02 YNEZ SOUTH OF WINCHESTER REPAINT 72 LEGENDS I
07/18/02 YNEZ SOUTH OF WINCHESTER REPAINT 55 LEGENDS
07/19/02 RANCHO CALIFONRIA ROAD AT HUMBER INSTALLED 150 L.F. YELLOW STRIPING
07/2202 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT YUKON INSTAI.I .I~D 300 L.F. Y/W STRIPING
07/22/02 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT YUKON INSTALLED 1 LEGEND
07/22/02 MARGARITA AT MORAGA AND AVENIDA BARCA REPA1NTED 43 LEGENDS
07/23/02 MARGARITA AT STONEWOOD AND LA SERENA REPA1NTED 43 LEGENDS
07/24/02 YNEZ ROAD AND PALA ROAD RE~AINTED 45 LEGENDS
07/24/02 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT YUKON REPAINTED 350 L.F. OF YELLOW STRIPING
07/25/02 RANCHO VISTA AT MARGARITA REPAINTED 8 LEGENDS
TOTAL NEW & REPAINTED LEGENDS 4~997
NEW & REPAINTED RED CURB & STRIPING LF. 475
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
GRAFFITI REMOVAL
MONTH OF JULY, 2002
DATE LOCATION WORK COMI~LETED
07/03/02 CAMINO MARCA REMOVED 2 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
07/09/02 L~'ER & NICHOLAS ROADS REMOVED 4 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
07/12/02 SASSARI AT ADELANTE REMOVED 31 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
07/15/02 VIA RIO TEMECULA AT AVENIDA DE MISSIONES REMOVED 70 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
07/15/02 RANCHO VISTA AT CRC REMOVED 3 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
07/18/02 PUJOL BOYS & GIRLS CLUB REMOVED 30 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
07/18/02 TEE DRIVE AT TEMEKIJ DRIVE REMOVED 4 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
07/23/02 26415 YNEZ (3 LOCATIONS) REMOVED 24 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
07/23/02 26455 YNEZ (3 LOCATIONS) REMOVED 12 S.F, OF GRAFFITI
07/23/02 26455 YNEZ (4 LOCATIONS) REMOVED 24 S,F. OF GRAFFITI
07/23/02 26447 YNEZ REMOVED 12 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
07/23/02 26435 YNEZ (5 LOCATIONS) REMOVED 18 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
07/25/02 JEDEDIAH SMITH AT HWY 79 SO. (2 LOCATIONS) REMOVED 400 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
07/25/02 27520 YNEZ (2 LOCATIONS) REMOVED 62 S,F. OF GRAFFITI
07/25/02 26810 YNEZ (2 LOCATIONS) REMOVED 80 S.F. OF GRAI~'FITI
07/25/02 MARGARITA AT MORAGA REMOVED 25 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
07/25/02 42101MORAGA (4 LOCATIONS) REMOVED 31 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
07/31/02 28101 PUJOL REMOVED 5 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
07/31/02 42200 PUJOL REMOVED 8 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
07/31/02 28816 PUJOL REMOVED 10 S.F. OF GRAI~lq 1'1
07/31/02 44260 REDHAWK REMOVED 70 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
TOTAL S.F. GRAFFITI REMOVED 925
TOTAL LOCATIONS 38
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
0
0
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DMSION
CATCH BASIN MA1NTENANCE
MONTH OF JULY, 2002
DATE LOCATION WORK COMPLETED
07/02/02 RANCHO VISTA / SPICA COURT CLEANED & CHECKED 2 CATCH BASINS
07/03K)2 OLD TOWN CLEANED & CHECKED 3 CATCH BASINS
07/24K)2 32544 HISLOP WAY CLEANED & CHECKED 2 CATCH BASINS
07/24/02 30563 IRON BARK CLEANED & CHECKED 1 CATCH BASINS
07/26/02 COOPER BEACH CLEANED & CHECKED 2 CATCH BASINS
07/30/02 42006 CAMINO CASANA CLEANED & CHECKED 2 CATCH BASINS
TOTAL CATCH BASINS CLEANED & CHECKED 12
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DMSION
ASPHALT (POTHOLES) REPAIRS
MONTH OF JULY, 2002
DATE LOCATION SCOPE OF WORK S.F. TOTAL
TONS
07/08/02 TEMECULA LANE AT PALA PARK POTHOLE REPAIR I 1.5
07/08/02 DIAZ ROAD AT RANCHO WAY R&R AC 16 ,~
07/09/02 CALLE TIARA AT CALLE FELICIDAD R&R AC 215 5.5
07/10/02 MARGARITA- RUSTIC GLEN TO WINE POTHOLE REPAIR 77 1
07/15/02 31225 FIELICITA R&R AC 273 6.5
07/15/02 31225 FIELICITA R&R AC 147 4.5
07118/02 31225 FIELICITA A.C. OVERLAY 125 4
07/22/02 31225 FIELICITA R&R A.C. 259 6.5
07/23/02 31225 FIELICITA R&R A.C. 128 3.5
07/25/02 30455 SAN PASQUAL A.C. OVE~Y 514 3.5
07/31/02 SAN PASQUAL A.C. OVERLAY 425 2.5
TOTAL S.F. OF REPAIRS 2~180
TOTAL TONS 39
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DMSION
RIGHT-OF-WAY TREE TRIMMING
MONTH OF JULY, 2002
DATE LOCATION WORK COMPLETED
07/01~2 CORTE VERANOS AT VIA POQUITO TRIMMED 2 R.O.W. TREES
07~25~2 CALLE BARCALDO AT CORTE ALMONTE TRIMMED 2 R.O.W. TREES
TOTAL R.O.W. TREES TRIMMED 4
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DMSION
SERVICE ORDER REQUEST LOG
MONTH OF JULY, 2002
DATE LOCATION REQUEST DATE WORK
RECEIVED COMPLETED
06/26/02 CORTE CARRIZO SLURRY 07/08/02
07/01/02 42850 AGENA TREE CONCERN 07/01/02
07/0102 32543 VALENTINO WAY TREE TRIMMING 07/01/02
07/02/02 NICHOLAS ROAD AT WINCHESTER ROAD DEBRIS PICK-UP 07/02/02
07/02A)2 MORAGA AT MARGARITA TRASH PICK-UP 07/08/02
07/0302 CALLE CONTENTO DEBRIS PICK-UP 07/03/02
07/03/02 JEFFERSON AT DEL RIO DEBRIS PICK-UP 07/03/02
07/03/02 CALLE PI~lA COLADA DEBRIS PICK-UP 07/08/02
07/03/02 CAMINO NUNEZ AT CORTE FLORECITA STREET NAME SIGN 07/05/02
07/03/02 CAMINO NUNEZ AT CORTE FLORECITA STREET NAME SIGN 07105102
07/03/02 TEMECULA LANE POTHOLE 07/08/02
07/05/02 CORTE ASTORGA AT CIROLLA DEBRIS 07/08/02
07/05/02 MARGARITA AT SONOMA SINKHOLE 07/08/02
07/08~2 NORTH GENERAL KEARNY AT SIERRA MADRE DEBRIS 07/09/02
07/087'02 MARGARITA AT AVENIDA SONOMA DEBRIS PICK-UP 07/09/02
07/10/02 MARGARITA AT RUSTIC GLEN GRAFFITI 07/11/02
07/10/02 43480 CORTE LOGRONO S.N.S. REPAIR 07/11/02
07/10/02 30563 IRON BARK CATCH BASIN CLEANING 07/12/02
07/11/02 BIYI' 1ERFIELD STAGE ROAD AT HWY. 79 SLLrRRY 07/11/02
07/11/02 MARGARITA AT SOLANA POTHOLE 07/11/02
07/12/02 OVERLAND AT YNEZ DEBRIS PICK-UP 07/12/02
07/12/02 21619 STONEWOOD DRIVE DEBRIS PICK-UP 07/12/02
07/12/02 29900 AVENIDA CIMA DEL SOL CLrRB REPAIR 07112/02
07/15/02 33986 ABBEY ROAD BARRICADE PICK-UP 071'[ 5/02
DATE LOCATION REQUEST DATE WORK
RECEIVED COMPLETED
07/15/02 31415 PASEO GOLETA DEAD TREE 07/15/02
07/17/02 OLD TOWN FRONT STREET DEBRIS REMOVAL 07/17/02
07/17/02 27555 YNEZ TREE REMOVAL 07/17/02
07/18/02 41875 CORTE LARA CURB WAXING 07/18/02
07/19/02 41875 CORTE LARA CURB WAXING 07/19/02
07/19/02 RANCHO CALIF. RD. AT BUSINESS PARK DRIVE DEBRIS PICK-UP 07/19/02
07/19/02 32544 HISLOP WAY CATCH BASIN CLEANING 07/19/02
07/19/02 41904 CARLTON WAY MOSQUITOS 07/19/02
07/19/02 42047 DAHLIA WAY S.N.S. MISSING 07/19/02
07/19/02 40007 HOLDEN CIRCLE W~RD ABATEMENT 97/19/02
07/22/02 41560 AVENIDA BARCA DEBRIS PICK-UP 07/24/02
07/23/02 41861 DEEPWOOD CIRCLE ROOT PRUNNING 07/23/02
07/23/02 43137 CORTE POLOSA SINKHOLE 07/23/02
07/24/02 40880 VIA LOS ALTOS DEBRIS PICK-UP 07/24/02
07/25/02 30584 VIA NORTE SINKHOLE 07/25/02
07/25/02 32125 CORTE PARADO DEBRIS PICK-UP 07/25/02
07/26/02 42922 CORTE ABANILLA POTHOLE 07/26/02
07/29/02 31756 PASEO DEL LAS OLAS ROOT PRUNING 07/29/02
07/29/02 44645 LORRA1NE DRIVE S.N.S. BENT 07/29/02
07/29/02 40252 CALLE MEDUSA TREE TRIMMING 07/29/02
07/29/02 42195 ROANOAKE STREET STORM DRAIN MAINT. 07/29/02
07/31/02 33198 C~O MARACA A.C. REPA1RS 07/31/02
07/31/02 MARGARITA N/O WINCHESTER RED XING RAiL HIT 07/31/02
TOTAL SERVICE ORDER REQUESTS 47
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DMSION
SIGNS
MONTH OF JULY, 2002
DATE LOCATION WORK COMPLETED
07/02/02 OVERLAND AT YNEZ REPLACED R- 18
07/03/02 OLD TOWN FRONT STREET AT RANCHO CALIF. REPAIRED 20 DELINEATORS
07/05/02 CAMINO NUNEZ AT CORTE FLORECITA REPAIR SNA 2
07/08/02 MARGARITA ROAD AT JEDEDIAH SMITH REPLACE . R26D/COMBO 1
07/08/02 MARGARITA ROAD AT SOUTHERN CROSS REPLACED R260D/COMBO 1
07/08~2 NORTH GENERAL KEARNEY AT LA COLIMA INSTALLED R2-40 1 MISSING
07/I 1/02 C STREET AT SANTIAGO REPAIRED R-1 1
07/12/02 DIAZ AT RANCHO WAY REPLACED W-56, TYPE "K", 2 TYPE "bi"
07/12/02 ALGENTE AT CORTE LERONO REPLACED S.N.S.
07/15/02 RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD. AT WEST CITY LIMITS REPLACED CITY LIMIT SIGN
07/15\02 RANCHO CALIFORNL~ RD. AT TOWER PLAZA REPLACED R2-40
07/16/02 MARGARITA AT RUSTIC GLEN REPLACED 10 DELIHEATORS
07/19/02 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT HUMBER INSTALLED 7 R.P.M.'S
07/19/02 WINCHESTER AT CITY LIMITS REPAIRED 2 SIGNS
07/22/02 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT YUKON INSTALLED 11 R.P.M.'S
07/23/02 JEI~'FERSON AT WINCHESTER REPLACED POLICE G-9
07/23/02 MEADOWS AT LA SERENA REPLACED 3 DELINEATORS
07/23/02 RANCHO CALIF. RD. AT BUTTERFIELD STAGE RD. REPLACED R-34, K MARKER, 9 DELINEATORS
07/24/02 VIA MONTEZUMA AT DEL RIO REPLACED W-56 DELILNEATOR
07/25/02 MARGARITA AT PAUBA REPLACED 2 DELINEATORS
07/25/02 MARGARITA AT HONORS REPLACED R-26-81 COMBO
07/25/02 VIA LA VIDA AT ORCHID REPLACED 4 S.N.S.
DATE LOCATION WORK COMPLETED
07/25/02 VIA NORTE AT DEL REY REPLACED W-17
07/26/02 41324 PLACER LAFITE INSTALLED W-53a
07/30/02 MARGARITA SOUTH OF PAUBA REPLACED W-41
07/30/02 RANCO CALIF. RD. AT BUTTERFIELD STAGE RD. REPAIRED 25 DELENEATORS
07/3 1/02 HWY 79 SO. AT BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD REPLACED 4 DELINEATORS
07/31/02 RANCHO CALIF. ROAD AT PROMENADE
CHARDONNAY HILLS REPAIRED 5 DELINEATORS
07/3 1/02 LA SERENA AT MEADOWS REPLACED 7 DELIINEATORS '
TOTAL SIGNS REPLACED ~6
TOTAL SIGNS INSTALLED 20
TOTAL SIGNS REPAIRED 55